SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors, Oil Program, US EPA
                                                                  Page 1 of 3
                                  I .GsntSfiLUs I E;MV$!mn  Search: I
                      ££A.Jl£>ffi3 > Oil Program > Spill Prevention,.Control and Coantersneasure > SPCC Guidance for
                      Regional Inspectors

       YOUuve        SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
 Abou*: ih
-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors, Oil Program, US EPA
Page 2 of 3
                      Interested parties are free to raise questions and objections about the substance of
                      the guidance and the appropriateness of the application of the guidance to a
                      particular situation. The guidance is a living document and may be revised
                      periodically without public notice. The document will be revised, as necessary, to
                      reflect any relevant future regulatory amendments. EPA welcomes public
                      comments on the document at any time and will consider those comments in any
                      future revision of the guidance document.
                      Using the Guidance

                      The SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors is divided into seven main chapters.
                      EPA recommends reading the ^nSire.SPCO.,rAije..3i4C}..!ftf-JL.^                          (PDF, 28 pp., 78 kb) clarifies
                            the facilities, activities, and equipment that are regulated under the SPCC
                            rule by providing an in-depth discussion of the applicability criteria and
                            relevant scenarios.
                                                               §'. (PDF, 32 pp., 206 kb) discusses
                            the use of the environmenta equivalence provision, lists the substantive
                            requirements eligible for environmental equivalence, clarifies certain policy
                            areas, provides examples of proper documentation, and describes the role
                            of the EPA inspector in reviewing deviations based on environmental
                            equivalence.
                            (PDF, 50 pp., 301 kb describes the various secondary containment
                            requirements and demonstrates how these requirements apply to specific
                            equipment and activities at an SPCC-regulated facility. This chapter also
                            discusses the impracticability determination provision of the rule, the
                            additional requirements that accompany an  impracticability determination,
                            and the documentation needed to support such a determination. The role of
                            the EPA inspector in reviewing and evaluating secondary containment
                            requirements and impracticability determinations is also discussed.
                                    .Si.Osf/Wate.f S^garators (PDF, 16 pp., 306 kb) addresses the
                            applicability of the SPCC rule to various scenarios involving oil/water
                            separators and other equipment.

                            Chapter .S:.Fa<;.Oj|^y..P.iagjEiams (PDF, 16 pp., 276 kb) provides guidelines on
                            the necessary level of detail for facility diagrams included in an SPCC Plan.
                            This chapter also includes example facility diagrams for different types of
                            facilities.
http://www.epa.Kov/oilspill/guidance.htm
  12/7/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors, Oil Program, US EPA
Page 3 of 3
                                                                         [(PDF, 42 pp., 164kb)
                            provides an overview of the SPCC inspection, evaluation, and testing
                            requirements, as well as how environmental equivalence may apply for
                            these requirements. The role of the EPA inspector in determining a facility's
                            compliance with the inspection, evaluation, and testing rule requirements
                            and a summary of industry standards, code requirements, and
                            recommended practices that apply to different types of equipment are also
                            discussed.

                      Appendices: The guidance includes several appendices that provide
                      supplementary information for inspectors.

                          • Appendix A •• Text of CVVA 311 l!X1}{o} (PDF, 1 p., 15 kb)
                          • A^endix B - Text of AO CFR par! 112 (PDF, 88 pp., 1,166 kb)
                                                                          (PDF, 4 pp., 25 kb)
                                                              MHi&Bim (PDF, 58 pp., 288 kb)
                                                    ^yo'L^ciJilY.f%n (PDF, 44 pp., 239 kb)
                                  3ix.F..::.S:isn^>!e.Co!xy!:K!g:j:!Cy.Pian (PDF, 24 pp., 394 kb)
                          • Appendix G - SPCC Inspection Checklists
                                o Qn^f^&xacjjiysiaisxckiding.p^ductioix!. (PDF, 16 pp., 77 kb)
                                o QnstMS..C^L.Pra«ijcaofL.Q!l^                         (PDF, 14
                                  pp., 69 kbj
                                ° Oifshore.QJi.Pfodu^ioiV^                          (PDF, 14
                                  pp., 65 kbj
                          • Appendix H - Other Policy Documents
                                o L&iter Js.M$!is§*
                                  AnnaHii'poQi}(ppFT2 pp." 9 kbj
                                o LeUe-r to Daniel Gifjigan of Petroleurn Marketers AsuoclaiiOfs ol
                                  As:neicaiy;i^.25,2QG4}..(PDF, 4 pp., 40 kbj
                                o Lelte? lo Mr Chris Eafj\.; of Saioiy^feer: CorpoEation (July 14^2004)
                                  {P"op74"pp  776 kb)
                                o DQT/£.PA.MsM!a.lJ.y.nsdi£t|.Q.noyrsr.Bj^^^
                                  J.&OM.£Cpnt.ait).s.!^^
                                  T!'y?iSSPf?aliQr!-Re!3ted Faciiitlfcs" (F;ebfUMy $• 2QOOJ (PDF, 14 pp.,
                                  230 kbj	
                                o FRPj;uk?.3[t3cnrnenSLQ:i.gDd.S-!i (PDF, 2 pp., 122 kb)



                                                     ; I §«pgf&Jnd..Honie | Q& Program
                                           A.H&aiS I Privacy and Security Notice | Contact Us


                                           Last updated on Friday, December 2nd, 2005
                                           URL: http://www.epa.gov/oilspill/guidance.htm
http://www.epa.gov/oilspill/guidance.htm
 12/7/2005

-------

-------
                                                                      Table of Contents
                            TABLE OF CONTENTS
DISCLAIMER	vil

OIL PROGRAM CONTACTS	 Ix

ACRONYMS LIST	  xiii

INTRODUCTION  	  1-1
      1.1    SPCC Background  	  1-1
             1.1.1  Purpose and Scope	  1-1
             1.1.2  Statutory Framework	  1-2
      1.2    Regulatory History	  1-4
             1.2.1  Initial Promulgation	  1-4
             1.2.2  SPCC Task Force and GAO Recommendations  	  1-5
             1.2.3  Proposed Revisions  	  1-7
             1.2.4  Final Rule Revision	  1-8
             1.2.5  Compliance Date Amendments  	  1-9
      1.3    Revised Rule Provisions 	  1-9
             1.3.1  Rule Organization	  1-10
             1.3.2  Summary of Major Revisions 	  1-11
      1.4    Using This Guidance  	  1-12

APPLICABILITY OF THE SPCC RULE	  2-1

      2.1    Introduction	  2-1
             2.1.1  Summary of General Applicability	  2-1
      2.2    Definition of Oil and Activities Involving Oil  	  2-3
             2.2.1  Animal Fats and Vegetable Oils  	  2-3
             2.2.2  Synthetic Oils 	  2-3
             2.2.3  Determination of "Oil" for Natural Gas and Hazardous Substances	  2-4
             2.2.4  Activities Involving Oil	  2-5
      2.3    "Non-transportation-related" Facilities - EPA/DOT Jurisdiction	  2-6
             2.3.1  Definition of Facility	  2-6
             2.3.2  Determination of Transportation-related and Non-transportation-related
                   Facilities 	  2-8
             2.3.3  EPA/DOT Jurisdiction Scenarios  	  2-9
      2.4    Reasonable Expectation of Discharge to Navigable Waters in Quantities That
             May Be Harmful	  2-12
             2.4.1  Definition of "Discharge" and "Discharge as Described in §112.1 (b)" ...  2-12
             2.4.2  Reasonable Expectation of Discharge 	  2-13
C/.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
             2.4.3  Geographic Scope  	 2-14
             2.4.4  Definition of "Navigable Waters"	 2-15
      2.5    Storage Capacity	 2-16
             2.5.1  Capacity Thresholds	 2-16
             2.5.2  Storage Capacity Calculation 	 2-16
             2.5.3  Definition of Storage Capacity 	 2-17
             2.5.4  Tank Re-rating  	 2-18
      2.6    Exemptions to the Requirements of the SPCC Rule	 2-18
             2.6.1  Facilities Subject to Minerals Management Service Regulations	 2-18
             2.6.2  Underground Storage Tanks 	 2-19
             2.6.3  Wastewater Treatment Facilities	 2-20
      2.7    Determination of Applicability by the Regional Administrator	 2-21
      2.8    SPCC Applicability for Different Types of Containers	 2-23
             2.8.1  Bulk Storage Container	 2-23
             2.8.2  Oil-filled Equipment	 2-23
      2.9    Determination of Applicability of Facility Response Plans	 2-24
      2.10   Role of the EPA Inspector	 2-25

ENVIRONMENTAL EQUIVALENCE	  3-1

      3.1    Introduction	  3-1
      3.2    Substantive Requirements Subject to the Environmental Equivalence
             Provision	  3-3
      3.3    Policy Issues Addressed by Environmental Equivalence	  3-4
             3.3.1  Security	  3-5
             3.3.2  Facility Drainage	  3-7
             3.3.3  Corrosion Protection and Leak Testing of Completely Buried Metallic Storage
                   Tanks  	 3-10
             3.3.4  Overfill Prevention	 3-11
             3.3.5  Piping  	 3-12
             3.3.6  Evaluation, Inspection, and Testing  	 3-15
      3.4    Review of Environmental Equivalence	 3-16
             3.4.1  SPCC Plan  Documentation	 3-16
             3.4.2  Role of the EPA Inspector   	 3-19

SECONDARY CONTAINMENT AND IMPRACTICABILITY DETERMINATIONS  	  4-1

      4.1    Introduction	  4-1
      4.2    Overview of Secondary Containment Provisions 	  4-2
             4.2.1  General Secondary Containment Requirement  	  4-8
             4.2.2  Specific Secondary Containment Requirements	 4-10
             4.2.3  Role of the EPA Inspector in Evaluating Secondary Containment
                   Methods 	 4-11
             4.2.4  Sufficient Freeboard 	 4-12
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
                                                                       Table of Contents
             4.2.5  Role of the EPA Inspector in Evaluating Sufficient Freeboard 	  4-16
             4.2.6  Passive versus Active Measures of Secondary Containment	  4-16
             4.2.7  Role of the EPA Inspector in Evaluating the Use of Active Measures of
                   Secondary Containment	  4-20
             4.2.8  "Sufficiently Impervious"  	  4-22
             4.2.9  Role of the EPA Inspector in Evaluating "Sufficiently Impervious" 	  4-23
             4.2.10 Facility Drainage (Onshore Facilities)	  4-25
             4.2.11 Role of the EPA Inspector in Evaluating Onshore Facility Drainage  ....  4-27
      4.3    Overview of the Impracticability Determination Provision   	  4-27
             4.3.1  Meaning of "Impracticable"	  4-28
      4.4    Selected Issues Related to Secondary Containment and Impracticability
             Determinations	  4-28
             4.4.1  General Secondary Containment Requirements, §112.7(c)	  4-29
             4.4.2  Secondary Containment Requirements for Loading/Unloading Racks,
                   §112.7{h)(1)  	  4-33
             4.4.3  Secondary Containment Requirements for Onshore Bulk Storage
                   Containers, §112.8(c)(2)	  4-38
             4.4.4  Secondary Containment Requirements for Mobile/Portable Containers,
                   §112.8{C)(11)	  4-39
             4.4.5  Secondary Containment Requirements for Bulk Storage Containers at
                   Production Facilities, §112.9(c)(2)	  4-40
             4.4.6  Secondary Containment Requirements for Onshore Drilling or Workover
                   Equipment, §112.10(c) 	  4-41
      4.5    Measures Required in Place of Secondary Containment	  4-42
             4.5.1  Integrity Testing of Bulk Storage Containers	  4-42
             4.5.2  Periodic Integrity and Leak Testing of the Valves and Piping	  4-43
             4.5.3  Oil Spill Contingency Plan and Written Commitment of Resources  ....  4-43
             4.5.4  Role of the EPA Inspector in Reviewing Impracticability Determinations  4-45

OIL/WATER SEPARATORS	  5-1

      5.1    Introduction	  5-1
      5.2    Overview of Provisions Applicable to Oil/Water Separators  	  5-2
      5.3    Oil/Water Separators Used in Wastewater Treatment	  5-5
             5.3.1  Description of Oil/Water Separator Use in Wastewater Treatment	  5-5
             5.3.2  Applicability of the SPCC Rule to Oil/Water Separators Used for Wastewater
                   Treatment 	  5-6
             5.3.3  Wastewater Treatment Exemption Clarification for Dry Gas Production
                   Facilities  	  5-8
      5.4    Oil/Water Separators Used To  Meet SPCC Secondary Containment
             Requirements 	  5-8
             5.4.1  Description of Oil/Water Separators Used to Meet SPCC Secondary
                   Containment Requirements  	  5-8
             5.4.2  Applicability of the SPCC Rule to Oil/Water Separators Used to Meet Specific
                   SPCC  Secondary Containment Requirements	  5-9
      5.5    Oil/Water Separators Used in Oil Production	  5-11
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
             5.5.1   Description of Oil/Water Separators Used in Oil Production	 5-11
             5.5.2   Applicability of the SPCC Rule to Oil/Water Separators Used in Oil
                    Production	 5-13
       5.6    Documentation Requirements and the Role of the EPA Inspector	 5-15
             5.6.1   Documentation by Owner/Operator	 5-15
             5.6.2   Role of the EPA Inspector	 5-16

FACILITY DIAGRAMS	 6-1

       6.1    Introduction	 6-1
             6.1.1   Purpose	 6-1
             6.1.2   Requirements for a Facility Diagram	 6-1
       6.2    Preparing a Facility Diagram	 6-2
             6.2.1   Level of Detail	 6-3
             6.2.2.  Facility Description 	 6-3
             6.2.3   Oil Containers	 6-3
             6.2.4   Mobile or Portable Containers	 6-4
             6.2.5   Completely Buried Storage Tanks 	 6-4
             6.2.6   Piping and Manufacturing Equipment	 6-5
             6.2.7   Use of State and Federal Diagrams  	 6-7
       6.3    Facility Diagram Examples 	 6-7
             6.3.1   Example #1: Bulk Storage and Distribution Facility  	 6-7
             6.3.2   Example #2: Manufacturing Facility  	 6-11
             6.3.3   Example #3: Oi! Production Facility  	 6-13
       6.4    Review of a Facility Diagram	 6-16
             6.4.1   Documentation by Owner/Operator	 6-16
             6.4.2   Role of the EPA Inspector	 6-16

INSPECTION, EVALUATION, AND TESTING  	 7-1

       7.1    Introduction	 7-1
       7.2    Inspection, Evaluation, and Testing Under the SPCC Rule 	 7-1
             7.2.1   Summary of Inspection and Integrity Testing Requirements	 7-2
             7.2.2   Regularly Scheduled Integrity Testing and Frequent Visual Inspection
                    of Aboveground Bulk Storage Containers	 7-6
             7.2.3   Brittle Fracture Evaluation of Field-Constructed Aboveground Containers 7-8
             7.2.4   Inspections of Piping	 7-9
             7.2.5   Flowline Maintenance	 7-10
             7.2.6   Role of Industry Standards and Recommended Practices in Meeting SPCC
                    Requirements 	 7-12
       7.3    Specific Circumstances	 7-16
             7.3.1   Aboveground Bulk Storage Container for Which the Baseline Condition Is
                    Known	 7-16
             7.3.2   Aboveground Bulk Storage Container for Which the Baseline Condition Is Not

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency          iv                      Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
                                                                       Table of Contents
                   Known	  7-17
             7.3.3  Deviation from Integrity Testing Requirements Based on Environmental
                   Equivalence	  7-19
             7.3.4  Environmental Equivalence Scenarios for Shop-Built Containers  	  7-20
      7.4    Documentation Requirements and Role of the EPA Inspector 	  7-22
      7.5    Summary of Industry Standards and Regulations	  7-24
             7.5.1  API Standard 653 - Tank Inspection, Repair, Alteration, and Reconstruction
                     	  7-25
             7.5.2  STI Standard SP-001 - Standard for the Inspection of Aboveground Storage
                   Tanks 	  7-27
             7.5.3  API Recommended Practice 575 - Inspection of Atmospheric and Low-
                   Pressure Storage Tanks	  7-29
             7.5.4  API Recommended Practice 12R1 - Recommended Practice for Setting,
                   Maintenance, Inspection, Operation, and Repair of Tanks in Production
                   Service  	  7-30
             7.5.5  API 570 - Piping Inspection Code: Inspection, Repair, Alteration, and
                   Rerating of In-service Piping Systems 	  7-31
             7.5.6  API Recommended Practice 574 - Inspection Practices for Piping System
                   Components 	  7-32
             7.5.7  API Recommended Practice 1110 - Pressure Testing of Liquid Petroleum
                   Pipelines	  7-33
             7.5.8  API Recommended Practice 579, Fitness-For-Service, Section 3	  7-33
             7.5.9  API Standard 2610 - Design, Construction, Operation, Maintenance, and
                   Inspection of Terminal & Tank Facilities  	  7-34
             7.5.10 ASME B31.3 - Process Piping 	  7-35
             7.5.11 ASME Code for Pressure Piping B31.4-2002 - Pipeline Transportation
                   Systems for Liquid Hydrocarbons and Other Liquids 	  7-36
             7.5.12 DOT 49 CFR 180.605 - Requirements for Periodic Testing, Inspection, and
                   Repair of Portable Tanks and Other  Portable Containers	  7-37
             7.5.13 FAA Advisory Circular 150/5230-4A-Aircraft Fuel Storage, Handling, and
                   Dispensing on Airports  	  7-38
             7.5.14 FAA Advisory Circular 150/5210-20 - Ground Vehicle Operations on Airports
                     	  7-38
             7.5.15 Suggested Minimum Requirements for PE-Developed Site-Specific Integrity
                   Testing Program (Hybrid Testing Program)  	  7-39

APPENDICES

      Appendix A  Text of CWA 311(j)(1)(c)
      Appendix B  Text of 40 CFR Part 112
      Appendix C  Summary of Revised Rule Provisions
      Appendix D  Sample Bulk Storage Facility SPCC Plan
      Appendix E  Sample Production Facility SPCC  Plan
      Appendix F  Sample Contingency Plan
      Appendix G  SPCC Inspection Checklists
      Appendix H  Other Policy Documents
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
                              This page intentionally left blank.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency          vi
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
                                                               EPA Oil Program Contacts
                      EPA OIL PROGRAM CONTACTS
       For more information on the Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure rule, or to
contact U.S. EPA headquarters and regional offices about this guidance or related issues, please
refer to the following contact information. Contact information is provided for the National
Response Center, the sole national point of contact for reporting all oil, chemical, radiological,
biological, and etiological discharges into the environment anywhere in the United States and its
territories.
                 Superfund, TRI, EPCRA, RMP, and Oil Information Center
The Superfund, TRI, EPCRA, RMP and Oil Information Center is a publicly accessible service that
provides up-to-date information on several EPA programs. The Information Center does not provide
regulatory interpretations, but maintains up-to-date information on the availability of publications
and other resources.  The Information Center is open Monday - Friday from 9:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.
Eastern Time (except federal holidays).

                                Toll free: (800) 424-9346
                        In the Washington, DC, area: (703) 412-9810
                                  TDD (800) 553-7672
                     TDD in the Washington, D.C. area: (703) 412-3323

                 http://www.epa.gov/superfund/resources/infocenter/index.htm
                                U.S. EPA Headquarters
The EPA Office of Emergency Management (OEM) is responsible for EPA's emergency prevention,
preparedness, and response duties, including the Oil Program.

                            Office of Emergency Management
                    Regulatory and Policy Development Division (RPDD)
                           Ariel Rios Building - Mail Code 5104A
                               1200 Pennsylvania Avenue
                                 Washington, DC 20460
                                  www.epa.gov/oilspill
                                    oilinfo@epa.gov
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
IX
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
                                U.S. EPA Regional Offices

The Oil Program is administered through EPA headquarters and the ten EPA regions, each of
which is responsible for the execution of EPA programs within several states or territories.  Contact
information for each of the Regional Oil Programs follows.
Region 1 - CT, ME, MA, NH, Rl, VT
One Congress Street, Suite 1100
Boston, MA  02114-2023
Main Number: (617) 918-1111
Region 7-IA, KS. MO, NE
Storage Tanks & Oil Pollution Branch
901 North 5th Street
Kansas City, KS 66101
EPA Region 7 Operations Center (913) 551-7050
SPCC Coordinator: (913) 551-7647/ (913) 551-7960
Region 2 -NJ. NY, PR, USVI
2890 Woodbridge Avenue
Building 209 (MS211)
Edison, NJ 08837-3679
Main Number: (732) 321-6654
SPCC Coordinator (732) 321-6654
Region 3-DE, DC, MD, PA, VA, WV
1650 Arch Street (3HS32)
Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029
Region 3 SPCC/FRP Hotline: 215-814-3452
Region 4-AL, FL, GA, KY. MS, NC, SC, TN
61 Forsyth Street
Atlanta, GA 30365-3415
Main Number: (404) 562-9900
SPCC Coordinator (404) 562-8705
Region 8- CO, MT, ND, SD, UT, WY
999 18th Street, Suite 300 (8EPR-SA)
Denver, CO  80202-2466
Main Number: (800) 227-8917
SPCC Coordinator: (303) 312-6496
Region 9- AZ, CA, HI, NV. AS, GU
75 Hawthorne Street (SFD9-2)
San Francisco, CA 94105
Main Number: (800) 231-3075
SPCC Coordinator: (415) 947-8000
Reg/on 10 - AK, ID, OR, WA
1200 6th Avenue (ECL-116)
Seattle, WA  98101
Main Number: (800) 424-4372
SPCC Coordinator: (206) 553-1671
Region 5- IL, IN, Ml, MN, OH, Wl
77 West Jackson Boulevard (SE-5J)
Chicago, IL 60604-3590
Main Number: (312) 353-2000
SPCC Coordinator (312) 886-7187
Alaska
U.S. EPA Alaska Operations Office
222 West 7th Ave. #19
Anchorage, AK  99513-7588
SPCC Coordinator: (907) 271-5083
Region 6-AR, LA, NM, OK, TX
1445 Ross Avenue (6SF-RO)
Dallas, TX 75202-2733
Main Number: (214) 665-6444
SPCC Coordinators: (214) 665-6489, (214)665-2785
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                      Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
                                                                EPA Oil Program Contacts
                               National Response Center

The National Response Center (NRC) is the sole federal point of contact for reporting oil, chemical,
radiological, biological, and etiological discharges into the environment anywhere in the United
States and its territories. The NRC operates 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year.

                      United States Coast Guard (G-OPF) - Room 2611
                                  2100 2nd Street. SW
                              Washington, DC 20593-0001
                                     (800) 424-8802
                                     (202) 267-2675
                                   Fax:202-267-1322
                                   TDD: 202-267-4477
                                  http://www.nrc.uscg.mil
US. Environmental Protection Agency
XI
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
                              This page intentionally left blank.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency         xii                       Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
                                                                           Acronyms
                               ACRONYMS LIST
AC         Advisory Circular
AFVO       Animal Fat and/or Vegetable Oil
API         American Petroleum Institute
ASME       American Society of Mechanical Engineers
ASNT       American Society for Non-Destructive Testing
AST        Aboveground Storage Tank
ASTM       American Society for Testing and Materials
BMP        Best Management Practice
BOP        Blowout Preventer
CERCLA    Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
C F R        Code of Federal Regulations
CRDM       Continuous Release Detection Method
CWA        Clean Water Act of 1972 (Federal Water Pollution Control Act)
DOI         U.S. Department of Interior
DOT        U.S. Department of Transportation
EO         Executive Order
EORRA     Edible Oil Regulatory Reform Act
E&P        Exploration and Production
EPA        U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
ERNS       Emergency Response Notification System
FDA        Food and Drug Administration
FAA        Federal Aviation Administration
FR         Federal Register
FRP        Facility Response Plan
GAO        General Accounting Office
GPR        General Pretreatment Regulations
IBC         Intermodal Bulk Container
ICP         Integrated Contingency Plan
IM          Intermodal
MIC         Microbial Influenced Corrosion
MMS        Minerals Management Service
MOU        Memorandum of Understanding
NACE       National Association of Corrosion Engineers
NCP        National Contingency Plan
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
XIII
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
NDE         Non-Destructive Examination
NFPA        National Fire Protection Association
NRC         National Response Center
NPDES      National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
OPA         Oil Pollution Act of 1990
OSHA        U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration
PE          Professional Engineer
PMAA        Petroleum Marketers Association of America
POTW       Publicly Owned Treatment Work
PSM         Process Safety Management
RA          Regional Administrator
RBI          Risk-Based Inspection
RP          Recommended Practice
RCRA        Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
RMS         Release Management Systems
SCADA      Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition
SPCC        Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure
STI          Steel Tank Institute
SWANCC     Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County
UIC          Underground Injection Control
UL          Underwriters Laboratory
USCG        U.S. Coast Guard
UST         Underground Storage Tank
UT          Ultrasonic Thickness
UTS         Ultrasonic Thickness Scans
UTT         Ultrasonic Thickness Testing
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
XIV
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
                                                                     Chapter 1: Introduction
                                  INTRODUCTION
       In 2002, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) amended the Oil Pollution
Prevention regulation (40 CFR part 112), which includes requirements for specific facilities to
prepare, amend, and implement Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plans. The
regulation is largely performance-based (as requested in comments from the regulated community),
which allows flexibility in meeting the rule requirements to prevent discharges of oil to navigable
waters and adjoining shorelines. EPA developed this guidance document to assist regional
inspectors in implementing the SPCC program and in understanding its applicability, and to help
clarify the role of the inspector in reviewing a facility's implementation of performance-based
flexibility provisions, such as environmental equivalence and impracticability.

1.1    SPCC Background
                                                    §112.2
                                                    Spill Prevention, Control, and
                                                    Countermeasure Plan; SPCC Plan, or Plan
                                                    means the document required by §112.3
                                                    that details the equipment, workforce,
                                                    procedures, and steps to prevent, control,
                                                    and provide adequate countermeasures to
                                                    a discharge.

                                                    Note: The above text Is an excerpt of the SPCC rule.
                                                    Refer to 40 CFR part 112 for the full text of the rule.
       The Oil Pollution Prevention regulation,
promulgated under the authority of §311 of the Clean
Water Act (CWA), sets forth requirements for
prevention of, preparedness for, and response to oil
discharges at specific non-transportation-related
facilities. To prevent oil from reaching navigable
waters and adjoining shorelines, and to contain
discharges of oil, the regulation requires these
facilities to develop and implement SPCC Plans and
establishes procedures, methods, and equipment
requirements.

1.1.1   Purpose and Scope
       Subparts A through C of part 112 are often referred to as the "SPCC rule."  Focusing on oil
spill prevention, preparedness, and response, the SPCC rule is designed to protect public health,
public welfare, and the environment from potential harmful effects of oil discharges to navigable
waters and adjoining shorelines. The rule requires facilities that could reasonably  be expected to
discharge oil in quantities that may be harmful into navigable waters of the United States and
adjoining shorelines to develop and implement SPCC Plans.  The Plans ensure that these facilities
put in place containment and countermeasures that will prevent oil discharges. The requirement to
develop, implement, and revise the SPCC Plan, as well as train employees to carry it out, will allow
owners and operators to achieve the goal of preventing, preparing for, and responding to oil
discharges that threaten navigable waters and adjoining shorelines.

       Part 112 also includes requirements for Facility Response Plans (FRPs). EPA has
established requirements that define who must prepare and submit an FRP and what must  be
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                                           1-1
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
included in the Plan. These requirements are found in Subpart D of 40 CFR part 112, which is
often referred to as the "FRP rule."1  Although the SPCC and FRP rules are related, and certain
SPCC-regulated facilities must also comply with FRP requirements, this guidance document
concerns the prevention requirements of the SPCC rule (40 CFR part 112, subparts A, B, and C).

       The SPCC rule carries out EPA's authority under CWA §311. Pursuant to Executive Order
11548, EPA was delegated the authority to regulate non-transportation-related onshore and
offshore facilities that could reasonably be expected to discharge oil into navigable waters of the
United States or adjoining shorelines (35 FR  11677, July 22,1970). Executive Order 11548 was
superceded by Executive Orders 11735 and 12777, respectively {38 FR 21243, August 7,1973; 56
FR 54757, October 22,1991).  The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) was delegated
authority over transportation-related onshore facilities, deepwater ports, and vessels.  A
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the Secretary of Transportation  and the EPA
Administrator, dated November 24, 1971 (36 FR 24080, December 18, 1971), defines
non-transportation-related facilities and transportation-related facilities. (A significant portion of this
MOU is included as Appendix A to 40 CFR part 112.)  In addition, the U.S. Department of the
Interior (DOI) regulates specific offshore facilities, including associated pipelines. The jurisdtctional
responsibilities of EPA, DOT, and DOI in relation to offshore facilities are further discussed in
another Memorandum of Understanding, dated November 8,1993.  (This MOU is included as
Appendix  B to 40 CFR part 112.)

1.1.2  Statutory Framework

       The Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, as amended, or Clean Water Act, is the
principal federal statute for protecting navigable waters, adjoining shorelines, and the waters of the
contiguous zone from pollution.  Section 311  of the CWA addresses the control of oil and
hazardous substance discharges, and provides the
authority for a program to prevent, prepare for, and
respond to such discharges. Specifically,
§311(j)(1)(C) mandates regulations establishing
procedures, methods, equipment, and other
requirements to prevent discharges of oil from
vessels and facilities and to contain such discharges.
(See Appendix A of this guidance document for the
textofCWA§311(j)(1)(C).)
       Under CWA §311(a)(1), "oil" is defined to
mean "oil of any kind or in any form..." In 1975, EPA
published a notice on the applicability of the SPCC
        §112.2
        Oil means oil of any kind or in any form,
        including, but not limited to: fats, oils, or
        greases of animal, fish, or marine mammal
        origin; vegetable oils, including oils from
        seeds, nuts, fruits, or kernels; and,  other
        oils and greases, including petroleum, fuel
        oil, sludge, synthetic oils, mineral oils, oil
        refuse, or oil mixed with wastes other than
        dredged spoil.
        Note: The above text is an excerpt of the SPCC rule.
        Refer to 40 CFR part 112 for the full text of the rule.
         1 The FRP rule applies to a subset of SPCC facilities: those that (1) have 42,000 gallons or more of oil
  storage capacity and transfer oil over water to or from vessels, or (2) have 1,000,000 gallons or more of oil storage
  capacity and lack secondary containment, are located at a distance such that a discharge from the facility could
  cause injury to fish and wildlife and sensitive environments or shut down a public water intake, or have experienced a
  reportable oil spill in an amount greater than or equal to 10,000 gallons within the last 5 years. See 40 CFR 112.20.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
1-2
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
                                                                       Chapter 1: Introduction
rule to non-petroleum oils. The notice confirmed that all facilities processing and storing
non-petroleum oils in the quantities and under circumstances set out in 40 CFR part 112 are
required to prepare and implement an SPCC Plan in accordance with that part (40 FR 28849, July
9,1975).  EPA stated that the broad and comprehensive definition of "oil" in the CWA is consistent
with the expressed congressional intent to strengthen federal law for the prevention, control, and
cleanup of oil spilled  in the aquatic environment.  Both EPA and the U.S. Coast Guard2 consistently
interpreted and administered §311 as applicable to spills of non-petroleum-based oils, particularly
because of the common physical and chemical properties of animal and vegetable oils and
petroleum oils, and their common potential for adverse environmental impact when discharged into
water.
       The Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA) streamlined and strengthened EPA's ability to prevent,
prepare for, and respond to catastrophic oil discharges. Specifically, OPA expands prevention and
preparedness activities, improves response capabilities, ensures that shippers and owners or
operators of facilities that handle oil pay the costs of discharges that do occur, expands research
and development programs, and establishes an Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund. OPA §4202(a)(6)
amended CWA §311 (j) to require regulations to be promulgated that require owners or operators of
certain vessels and facilities to prepare and submit Facility Response Plans (FRPs) for responding
to a worst case discharge of oil and to a substantial threat of such a discharge (CWA §311 (j)(5)).
EPA published the FRP rule on July 1,1994, as an amendment to 40 CFR part 112. The FRP
requirement for onshore facilities applies to any facility that, "because of its location, could
reasonably be expected to cause substantial harm to the environment by discharging into or on the
navigable waters, adjoining shorelines, or the exclusive economic zone."

       In 1995, Congress enacted the Edible Oil Regulatory Reform Act (EORRA).  The statute
mandates that most federal agencies differentiate between and establish separate classes for
various types of oils; specifically, animal fats and oils and greases, fish and  marine mammal oils,
oils of vegetable origin, and other oils and greases (including petroleum). In differentiating between
these classes of oils, EORAA directed federal agencies to consider differences in these oils'
physical, chemical, biological, and other properties, and in their environmental effects. By an
August 12, 1994, letter submitted on behalf of several agricultural organizations, EPA received a
Petition for Reconsideration of the FRP rule as it applies to facilities that handle, store, or transport
animal fats or vegetable oils.3  On October 20,  1997, EPA denied the petition to amend the FRP
rule (62 FR 54508) because it did not substantiate the petitioner's claims that animal fats and
vegetable oils differ from petroleum oils in properties and effects and concluded that the facts did
not support a further differentiation between these groups of oils under the FRP rule. Instead, EPA
found that a worst case discharge or substantial threat of a discharge of animal fats and vegetable
         2 DOT delegated authority over transportation-related facilities and vessels to the U.S. Coast Guard. In
  March 2003, the Coast Guard formally transferred from DOT to the Department of Homeland Security, but retains this
  CWA authority (Executive Order 13286, 68 FR 10619, March 5, 2003).

         3 "Petition for Reconsideration and Stay of Effective Date," August 12, 1994, submitted on behalf of the
  American Soybean Association, the Corn Refiners Association, the National Corn Growers Association, the Institute
  of Shortening & Edible Oils, the National Cotton Council, the National Cottonseed Products Association, and the
  National Oilseed Processors Association.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
1-3
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
oils to navigable waters, adjoining shorelines, or the exclusive economic zone could reasonably be
expected to cause substantial harm to the environment, including wildlife that may be killed by the
discharge.

       However, in the June 30, 2000, amendments to the FRP rule, in response to EORRA
requirements, EPA promulgated a separate approach for calculating planning volumes for a worst
case discharge in the FRPs for animal fat and vegetable oil facilities (65 FR 40776).

       EPA also published an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking requesting ideas from the
public on how to differentiate among the SPCC requirements for facilities storing or using various
categories of oil (64 FR 17227, April 8,1999). In the 2002 revision of the SPCC rule, EPA provided
new subpartsto facilitate differentiation between categories of oil listed in EORRA; however, the
requirements in each of the subparts are identical.

1.2   Regulatory History

       The SPCC rule was initially promulgated in 1973, with modifications to the SPCC
requirements proposed for public comment on several occasions in the 1990s.  Incorporating many
aspects of the earlier proposals, final revisions to the rule were published in the Federal Register
(FR) in July 2002. However, EPA extended the compliance dates in the SPCC rule for amending
existing SPCC Plans and for implementing amended or new Plans developed under revised 40
CFR part 112. EPA extended the dates to give owners and operators of affected facilities more
time to understand the revised requirements, to amend and implement their SPCC Plans that
comply with the revised requirements, and to understand the SPCC rule clarifications developed
during settlement proceedings in response to legal challenges filed by the regulated community
(see 69 FR 29728, May 25, 2004).

1.2.1   Initial Promulgation

       The original SPCC  rule proposal was published in the Federal Register on July 19, 1973  (38
FR 19334). The original SPCC final rule was published in the Federal Register on December 11,
1973, with an effective date of January 10,1974 (38 FR 34164). The regulation established oil
discharge prevention procedures, methods, and equipment requirements for non-transportation-
related facilities with an aboveground (non-buried) oil storage capacity greater than 1,320 gallons
(or greater than 660 gallons aboveground in a single tank) or a buried underground oil storage
capacity greater than 42,000 gallons.  Regulated facilities were also limited to those that, because
of their location, could reasonably be expected to discharge oil into the navigable waters of the
United States or adjoining shorelines.  The rule included sections on general applicability, relevant
definitions, and requirements for preparation of SPCC Plans: provisions for SPCC Plan
amendments; civil penalty provisions; and requirements for the substance of the SPCC Plans.

       Two early revisions were made to the original SPCC rule. On August 29,1974, the
regulation was amended (39 FR 31602) to set out EPA's policy on civil penalties for violation of the


U.S. Environmental Protection Agency         1-4                     Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
                                                                     Chapter 1: Introduction
CWA §31 1 requirements. On March 26, 1 976, the rule was again amended (41 FR 12567),
primarily to clarify the criteria for determining whether or not a facility is subject to the regulation.
This rulemaking also clarified that SPCC Plans must be in a written form (§1 12.7, introductory
paragraph) and specified procedures for developing SPCC Plans for mobile facilities.4

1.2.2  SPCC Task Force and  GAO Recommendations
       In January 1988, a four-million gallon
aboveground storage tank in Ftoreffe, Pennsylvania,
experienced a brittle fracture of the tank shell, which
then split apart, collapsed, and released approximately
3.8 million gallons of diesel fuel.  Of this amount,
approximately 750,000 gallons were discharged into the
Monongahela River. The spill temporarily contaminated
drinking water sources, damaged the ecosystems of the
Monongahela and Ohio rivers, and negatively affected
private property and local businesses.  Following the
discharge, an SPCC Task Force was formed to examine
federal regulations governing discharges from
aboveground storage tanks. The Task Force, consisting
of representatives from EPA headquarters and regions,
other federal agencies, and the states, issued its findings
and recommendations in May 1988.  The findings
focused on the prevention of catastrophic discharges
and recommended changes to the SPCC program (EPA,
"The Oil Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasures
Program Task Force Report," Interim Final Report, May
13, 1988).5
                                                    Floreffe, Pennsylvania.
       Specifically, the Task Force recommended that EPA establish additional technical
requirements for SPCC Plan preparation and implementation, including:

             Adopting industry standards for new and relocated tanks;
             Differentiating SPCC requirements based on facility size;
             Modifying timeframes for SPCC Plan preparation, implementation, and review;
             Requiring strengthened integrity testing and periodic inspection of tanks and
             secondary containment;
             Requiring a more stringent attestation for a Professional Engineer to certify an SPCC
             Plan;
        4 Mobile facilities include onshore drilling or workover rigs, barge-mounted offshore drilling or workover rigs,
  and portable fueling facilities.

        5 Available in EPA docket OPA-1991 -0001.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                                            1-5
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
       •      Ensuring that employees undergo response training; and
             Modifying definitions and providing additional preamble discussion.

The Task Force also recommended that EPA expand the scope of the regulation to include
requirements for facility-specific contingency planning and to specify countermeasures to be
employed if a discharge should extend beyond the site in an uncontrolled manner. To better
identify violations and enforce compliance, the Task Force recommended that EPA strengthen its
facility inspection program. The Task Force also found that EPA did not have an adequate
inventory of facilities subject to the regulation, and that improvements in national response
coordination may be possible.  Finally, the Task Force commented on the role of state and local
resources and other federal agencies in oil discharge prevention and response efforts, and also
recommended funding research on the development of oil discharge removal and control
technology.

       In response to both the Monongahela River spill and an oil spill at an oil refinery in Martinez,
California, in April 1988, the General Accounting Office (GAO) examined the adequacy of the
federal regulations of aboveground oil  storage tanks and the extent to which they addressed the
unique problems of inland oil discharges. GAO's report, "Inland Oil Spills: Stronger Regulation and
Enforcement Needed to Avoid  Future Incidents," contained recommendations on regulations,
inspections, enforcement, and  government response that were similar to those of the SPCC Task
Force (February 1989, GAO/RCED-89-65).6 To amend the SPCC regulation, GAO made
recommendations to the EPA Administrator that EPA require;

             Aboveground oil storage tanks to be built and tested in accordance with industry and
             other specified standards;
             Facilities to plan how to react to a spill that overflows facility  boundaries; and
             Storm water drainage systems to be designed and operated to prevent oil from
             escaping through them.  Oil escaped through the drainage system during the oil  spill
             in Martinez, California.

       For inspections, GAO recommended that EPA (1) strengthen its aboveground oil storage
facility inspection program by coordinating with state and local authorities, developing procedures
for conducting and documenting inspections, defining and implementing minimum training
procedures for inspectors, and establishing a  national policy for fining violators; and (2) consider
advantages and disadvantages of supplementing EPA inspection resources with state and local
inspection resources and requiring that facilities obtain certification from independent engineers that
facilities are in compliance with the regulations. Finally, the report also included a recommendation
to Congress that it amend the CWA to explicitly authorize the federal government to recover the
costs of monitoring  oil spill cleanups performed by private responsible parties, and to EPA that it
consider re-establishing the oil spill research and development program.
        8 Available in EPA docket OPA-1991 -0001.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency         1 -6                      Version 1.0,11 /28/2005

-------
                                                                   Chapter 1: Introduction
1.2.3  Proposed Revisions

      Following the Monongahela River spill and recommendations of the SPCC Task Force and
GAO, EPA proposed substantive revisions to the SPCC requirements on three occasions (1991,
1993, and 1997) and solicited public comment on these revisions.  Specifically:

             On October 22, 1991 (56 FR 54612), EPA proposed changes in the applicability of
             the SPCC rule  and in the required procedures for completing SPCC Plans, as well
             as the addition of a facility notification provision. The proposed rule also reflected
             changes in the jurisdiction of CWA §311 made by the 1977 and 1978 amendments
             to the Act.

             On February 17,1993 (58 FR 8824), EPA published an additional proposed rule to
             incorporate new requirements added by OPA that directed facility owners and
             operators to prepare plans for responding to a worst case discharge of oil and to a
             substantial threat of such a discharge {the FRP rule).  EPA promulgated the FRP
             rule on July 1,  1994 (59 FR 34070). The 1993 proposed rule also included revisions
             to the SPCC requirements, including: (1) a requirement for an SPCC Plan to address
             training and methods of evaluating containers for protection against brittle fracture;
             (2) provisions for Regional Administrators to require amendments to an SPCC Plan
             and to require a Plan from an otherwise exempt facility when necessary to achieve
             the goals of the CWA; and (3) a requirement for Plan submission if an owner or
             operator invokes a waiver to certain technical requirements of the SPCC rule.

             On December 2, 1997 (62 FR 63812), EPA proposed further revisions to the SPCC
             rule in an effort to reduce the information collection burden without creating an
             adverse impact on public health or the environment. The proposed  revisions were
             intended to give facility owners and operators flexibility to use alternative formats for
             SPCC Plans; to allow the use of certain records maintained  pursuant to usual and
             customary business practices, or pursuant to the  National Pollutant  Discharge
             Elimination System (NPDES) program,  in lieu of records mandated by the SPCC
             requirements; to reduce the information required to be submitted after certain
             discharges; and to extend the interval between SPCC Plan reviews  by the facility
             owner/operator. At this time, EPA also  proposed  amendments to the FRP
             requirements, which were finalized on June 30, 2000 (65 FR 40776).

1.2.4  Final Rule Revision

      On July 17, 2002, EPA issued a final rule amending the Oil Pollution Prevention regulation,
primarily with respect to the SPCC subparts of part 112 (67 FR 47042). The final rule became
effective on August 16, 2002,  and modified  many aspects of the  proposals  described above. As a
performance-based regulation, the rule provides flexibility to the  regulated community in meeting
many of the oil discharge prevention requirements and the overall goal of preventing oil spills that
may impact navigable waters  or adjoining shorelines.  In addition, the final rule includes new
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
1-7
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
subparts outlining the requirements for various classes of oil (pursuant to EORRA), revises the
applicability of the regulation, amends the requirements for completing SPCC Plans, and makes
other modifications. The final rule also contains a number of provisions designed to decrease
regulatory burden on facility owners and operators subject to the rule, while preserving
environmental protection.

       In response to the final SPCC amendments, several members of the regulated community
filed legal challenges to certain aspects of the rule.7 Settlement discussions between EPA and the
plaintiffs led to an agreement on all issues except the definition of navigable waters. On May 25,
2004, EPA published a notice in the Federal Register (69 FR 29728) clarifying specific provisions of
the SPCC rule that it developed in the course of settlement.  The Federal Register notice clarified
statements regarding loading/unloading racks and impracticability that were  challenged by the
plaintiffs, in addition, EPA clarified aspects of the wastewater treatment exemption and specified
which definition  of "facility" applies to §112.20(f)(1). EPA also announced the availability of a letter
from EPA to the Petroleum Marketers Association of America (PMAA), which provides additional
guidance on equivalent environmental protection with respect to requirements for integrity testing,
security, and loading racks.8

       The specific amendments to the SPCC rule are discussed in more detail in Section 1.3,
Revised Rule Provisions, below, as well as in Appendix C, Summary of  Revised SPCC Rule
Provisions.

1.2.5  Compliance Date Amendments

       Following the 2002 final rule, on three occasions EPA extended the compliance dates for
facilities to update (or for new facilities to prepare) and  implement an SPCC  Plan that complies with
the revised requirements. The extensions provided additional time for the regulated community to
understand the  SPCC  amendments and the implications of the settlement clarifications, and
alleviated the need for individual extension requests.

       EPA issued final rules in both 2003 and 2004 (68 FR 1348, January 9, 2003; 68 FR 18890,
April 17,2003; and 69 FR 48794, August 11, 2004) that each extended  the compliance  dates in
§112.3(a) and (b).  The 2004 final rule also amended the compliance dates for onshore and
offshore mobile  facilities (§112.3(c)). The current compliance dates in §112.3(a) and (b) for
facilities are as follows:
        7 See American Petroleum /nsf/fute v Leavitt et al, No. 1 ;102CV02247 PLF and consolidated cases (D.D.C.
  filed November 14, 2002).  Lead plaintiffs in the cases were the American Petroleum Institute, Marathon Oil Co., and
  the Petroleum Marketers Association of America.

        8 The Federal Register Notice and letter to PMAA are available on the Oil Program Web site,
  http://www.epa.gov/oilspill

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency         1-8                      Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
                                                                     Chapter 1: Introduction
A facility starting operation...
On or before August 16, 2002
After August 16,2002,
through August 18, 2006
After August 18, 2006
Must...
Maintain the facility's existing SPCC Plan.
Amend SPCC Plan no later than February 17, 2006.
Implement SPCC Plan no later than August 18, 2006.
Prepare and implement an SPCC Plan no later than
August 18, 2006.
Prepare and implement an SPCC Plan before beginning
operations.
Mobile facilities must prepare, implement, and maintain a Plan as required by the SPCC rule.  They
must amend and implement the Plan, if necessary to ensure compliance with the revised SPCC
rule, on or before August 18, 2006. Mobile facilities that become operational after August 18, 2006,
must prepare and implement a Plan before starting operations (§112.3(c)).

1.3   Revised  Rule Provisions

       The 2002 revision to the SPCC rule clarifies the language and organization of the regulation,
makes technical changes, and reduces regulatory burden.  This section provides an overview of the
rule's organization and highlights some of the more substantive changes made to the rule.

       For the inspector's reference, Appendix B of this document includes the Oil Pollution
Prevention regulation, 40 CFR part 112, in its entirety and current as of the publication of this
document.  Since the regulation is subject to change, this appendix is provided for informational
purposes only. The Federal Register, the official daily publication for rules, proposed rules, and
notices of federal agencies and organizations, is available electronically from the Government
Printing Office Web site at http://www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/. General and permanent rules published in
the Federal Register are also codified in the Cocte of Federal Regulations (CFR), available
electronically at http://www.gpoaccess.gov/cfr/. Inspectors implementing the SPCC program should
always consult the aforementioned resources (or their equivalent) to obtain the current version of
the SPCC rule.

1.3.1   Rule Organization

       Part 112 is divided into four subparts, according to the oil and facility type. Subparts A, B,
and C address oil discharge prevention requirements and are commonly referred to as the "SPCC
rule."  Subpart D, commonly referred to as the "FRP rule," addresses facility response planning
requirements in the event of an oil discharge, and includes the FRP requirements and facility
response training and drill requirements. The part is organized as follows:

       Subpart A    Applicability, definitions, and general requirements for alt facilities and all
                    types of oil
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
1-9
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
       Subpart B    Requirements for petroleum oils and non-petroleum oils, except those
                    covered in Subpart C
       Subpart C    Requirements for animal fats and oils and greases, and fish and marine
                    mammal oils; and for vegetable oils, including oils from seeds, nuts, fruits,
                    and kernels
       Subpart D    Response requirements

       Pertaining to all oil and facility types, Subpart A contains key sections of the SPCC rule,
including:

       §112.1        General Applicability
       §112.2       Definitions
       §112.3       Requirement to Prepare and Implement an SPCC Plan
       §112.4       Amendment of an SPCC Plan by Regional Administrator
       §112.5       Amendment of an SPCC Plan by Owners or Operators
       §112.7       General Requirements for SPCC Plans

       Additional requirements for specific facility types are given in §§112.8 through  112.12,9 and
are found within subparts B and C.  These facility types and their corresponding sections of the rule
are:

       Onshore Facilities (excluding production facilities)            §§112.8 and 112.12
       Oil Production Facilities (onshore)                          §112.9
       Oil Drilling and Workover Facilities (onshore)                §112.10
       Oil Drilling, Production, or Workover Facilities (offshore)      §112.11

       The Oil Pollution Prevention regulation also contains several appendices, including
Memoranda of Understanding and appendices referenced in the FRP rule (Substantial Harm
Criteria, Determination of a Worst Case Discharge Planning Volume, Determination and Evaluation
of Required Response Resources for Facility Response Plans, and a model Facility-Specific
Response Plan).

1.3.2   Summary of Major Revisions

       The 2002 final SPCC rule is a performance-based  regulation that allows owners, operators,
and the certifying Professional Engineer (PE)  flexibility in meeting many of the prevention
        9 The 2002 SPCC rule includes requirements within subpart C that are not applicable or are inappropriate for
  animal fats and vegetable oils. Asa result, §§112.13 through 112.15 are not included here. These sections were
  promulgated because EPA had not proposed differentiated SPCC requirements for public notice and comment.
C/.S. Environmental Protection Agency        1-10                     Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
                                                                      Chapter 1: Introduction
requirements.  Assisting inspectors in the evaluation of the proper use of environmental
equivalence and impracticability is one of the primary objectives of this guidance document. The
"environmental equivalence" provision allows facilities to deviate from specified substantive
requirements of the SPCC rule (except secondary containment provisions) by implementing
alternate measures, certified by a PE, that provide equivalent environmental protection. Deviations
are not allowed for the administrative provisions of the rule, §§112.1 through 112.5, and for certain
additional requirements in §112.7, such as recordkeeping and training provisions.  Additionally, in
situations where secondary containment is not practicable, the owner/operator must clearly explain
the reason for  the determination in the SPCC Plan; for bulk storage containers, conduct periodic
integrity testing of containers and associated valves and piping; and prepare an oil spill contingency
plan and a written commitment of manpower, equipment, and  materials to expeditiously control and
remove any quantity of oil discharged that may be harmful  (§112.7(d)).

       The 2002 final rule revised many of the rule provisions, both to provide regulatory relief and
to make technical changes. The rule exempts many completely buried tanks, containers storing
less than 55 gallons, and certain wastewater treatment operations/facilities; raises the regulatory
threshold; and both reduces information required after a discharge and raises the regulatory trigger
for its submission.  In addition, the rule decreased the frequency of Plan review from every three
years to every five years.

       Technical changes to the rule include requiring brittle fracture evaluation for field-
constructed  aboveground containers; strengthening the integrity testing requirements; finalizing
additional general requirements for spill planning, preparedness, and reporting; adding a
requirement for a facility diagram; clarifying the rule's applicability to the  operational use of oil; and
making the PE certification and associated attestation more specific.  Also, the rule allows
alternative formats for SPCC Plans with a cross-reference  and mandates specific time frames for
employee training.

       The specific amendments to each section of the SPCC rule are highlighted in Appendix C of
this document, Summary of Revised SPCC Rule Provisions.  Also, Chapter 2 of this document
discusses in greater detail the applicability of the revised SPCC rule, including facilities, activities,
and equipment subject to SPCC requirements.

1.4   Using This Guidance
       SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors is
intended to assist EPA regional inspectors in
implementing the revised SPCC rule, including
environmental equivalence, impracticability, and
integrity testing, as well as the role of the inspector in
the review of these provisions.  This guidance does not
address all aspects of the SPCC rule.  It is intended to
establish a consistent understanding among regional
          Throughout the document, excerpts of the
          SPCC rule that are relevant to a particular
          section of this document are provided in
          text boxes. This information is provided
          for informational purposes only. The
          reader should always refer to the full text
          of the current 40 CFR part 112 for the
          applicable regulatory language, available
          from the Government Printing Office Web
          site at http://www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
1-11
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
EPA inspectors on how certain provisions of the rule may be applied. It is not, however, a
substitute for the regulation itself.

       Many of the terms used in this guidance document have specific regulatory definitions in 40
CFR 112.2; however, other regulatory programs may define some of these terms differently.
Please refer to §112.2 of the rule and associated preamble of the July 2002 Federal Register
publication for clarification of defined terms in the SPCC rule. An Acronyms List, provided at the
beginning of this document, defines all acronyms used throughout the guidance.

       This document is  divided into seven main chapters and includes several appendices for the
reader's reference, as follows:

       Chapter 1: Introduction discusses the purpose and scope of the 40 CFR part 112, the
       regulatory history, and the July 2002 amendments.

       Chapter 2: Applicability of the SPCC Rule clarifies the facilities, activities, and equipment
       that are subject to the SPCC rule through an in-depth discussion of the rule and relevant
       scenarios.

       Chapter 3: Environmental Equivalence discusses the use of the "environmental
       equivalence"  provision, which allows facilities to implement alternate measures based on
       site-specific considerations, as long as the measures provide equivalent environmental
       protection, in  accordance with good engineering practice and as determined by a PE.

       Chapter 4: Secondary Containment and Impracticability Determinations discusses the
       secondary containment requirements and explains when an impracticability determination
       can be made and how the determination should be documented.
       Chapters: Oil/Water Separators addresses various scenarios involving oil/water
       separators with respect to the SPCC rule requirements.

       Chapter 6: Facility Diagrams provides guidelines on the necessary level of detail for facility
       diagrams included in SPCC Plans. This section also includes example facility diagrams for
       different types of facilities.

       Chapter?: Inspections, Evaluation, and Testing explains the  inspection, evaluation, and
       testing requirements for facilities subject to the SPCC rule, as well as how "environmental
       equivalence"  may apply for the integrity testing  requirements of the SPCC rule.

The appendices include a complete copy of the relevant sections of the  statutory authority from the
Clean Water Act; the Oil Pollution Prevention regulation (40 CFR part 112); the Discharge of Oil
regulation (40 CFR part 110); the Criteria for State, Local and Regional Oil Removal Contingency
Plans (40 CFR part 109); a summary of revised rule provisions; inspector checklists; model SPCC
Plans; and a model contingency plan.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency        1-12                     Version 1.0,11 /28/2005

-------
                                                                      Chapter 2: Applicability
                    APPLICABILITY OF THE SPCC RULE
2.1    Introduction
       The SPCC rule regulates non-transporlation-related onshore and offshore facilities that
could reasonably be expected to discharge oil into navigable waters of the United States or
adjoining shorelines.  This chapter clarifies the facilities, activities, and equipment that are subject
to the SPCC rule. It is the responsibility of the facility owner/operator to make the determination
whether the facility is subject to the requirements of the SPCC rule.  This determination is subject to
review by the Regional Administrator or his delegated representative.

2.1.1   Summary of General Applicability
                                                     ...this part applies to any owner or operator
                                                     of a non-transportation-related onshore or
                                                     offshore facility engaged in drilling,
                                                     producing, gathering, storing, processing,
                                                     refining, transferring, distributing, using, or
                                                     consuming oil and oil products, which
                                                     due to its location, could reasonably be
                                                     expected to discharge oil in quantities that
                                                     may be harmful, as described in part 110
                                                     of this chapter, into or upon the navigable
                                                     waters of the United States or adjoining
                                                     shorelines...

                                                     Note: The above text is an excerpt of the SPCC rule.
                                                     Emphasis added. Refer to 40 CFR part 112 for the
                                                     full text of the rule.
       Section 112.1 establishes the general
applicability of the SPCC rule by describing both the
facilities, activities, and equipment that are subject to
the rule and those that are excluded. In general,
SPCC-regulated facilities are non-transportation-
related, have aboveground oil storage capacity of
more than 1,320 gallons on site, and could reasonably
be expected to discharge oil to navigable waters or
adjoining shorelines in quantities that may be harmful.
Facilities owned  and operated by federal government
agencies are subject to the regulation to the same
extent as any other facility (although the federal
government is not subject to civil penalties).  Likewise,
facilities owned and operated by state and local
governments are subject to the regulation. Section
112.1(d) describes the facilities, activities, and equipment excluded from the rule based on
jurisdiction or through  exemptions or exclusions from storage capacity calculations.  Exemptions
pertain to whether a facility or part thereof is included in the SPCC-regulated universe, and
exclusions from storage capacity determine which containers count when determining a facility's
total oil  storage capacity. In  addition to facilities that are excluded from the SPCC rule because
they are not subject to EPA's jurisdiction,  §112.1(d) exempts:
              Any facility where the storage capacity of completely buried storage tanks and
              associated piping and equipment does not exceed 42,000 gallons and the aggregate
              aboveground storage capacity does not exceed 1,320 gallons;
              Any container with a storage capacity less than 55 gallons at a facility, whether or
              not subject to the requirements of the SPCC rule; and
              Any facility or part thereof used exclusively for wastewater treatment.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                                            2-1
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
       Exclusions from storage capacity calculations include:

              Containers with a storage capacity of less than 55 gallons;
              Storage containers used exclusively in wastewater treatment;
       *       Completely buried tanks and associated piping and equipment that are subject to all
              of the technical requirements under 40 CFR part 280 or 281; and
              The capacity of any "permanently closed"  aboveground storage container.

       Notwithstanding the exemptions and exclusions provided in §112.1(d), under §112.1(f) the
Regional Administrator has discretion to require the owner or operator of any facility, subject to
EPA's jurisdiction under §31 l(j) Clean Water Act (CWA), to submit an SPCC Plan, or part of an
SPCC Plan, in order to carry out the purposes of the CWA.

       This chapter further explains each of the applicability criteria listed in §112.1 and provides
examples of how these criteria are applied. The remainder of this chapter is organized as follows:

              Section 2.2 discusses the definition of "oil" and the regulated activities.
              Section 2.3 discusses the difference between "transportation-related" and  "non-
              transportation-related" facilities in determining jurisdiction of regulatory agencies.
       *       Section 2.4 discusses the term "reasonable expectation of discharge to navigable
              waters in quantities that may be harmful."
       •       Section 2.5 addresses the storage capacity thresholds and the methods of
              calculating storage capacity.
       *       Section 2.6 addresses the exemptions to  the SPCC rule.
       •       Section 2.7 discusses the process for a Regional Administrator to determine
              applicability, outside  of §112.1(d) requirements.
       •       Section 2.8 addresses the applicability of the rule requirements to oil-filled
              equipment (including manufacturing or process equipment), in contrast to bulk
              storage containers.
       *       Section 2.9 discusses the applicability of Facility Response Plans (FRPs).
              Section 2.10 describes the role of the EPA inspector.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency         2-2                      Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
                                                                       Chapter 2: Applicability
2.2   Definition of Oil and Activities Involving  Oil
       The SPCC rule applies to facilities with the
potential to discharge "oil" in quantities that may be
harmful to navigable waters and adjoining shorelines.
The SPCC rule's definition of oil originated from the
Clean Water Act (CWA). Section 311 (a)(1) of the
CWA defines oil as "oil of any kind  or in any form,
including, but not limited to, petroleum, fuel oil,
sludge, oil refuse, and oil mixed with wastes other
than dredged spoil."  Petroleum oils include crude
and refined petroleum products, asphalt, gasoline,
fuel oils, mineral oils, naphtha, sludge, oil refuse, and
oil mixed with wastes other than dredged spoil {67 FR
47075).
         §112.2
         Oil means oil of any kind or in any form,
         including, but not limited to: fats, oils, or
         greases of animal, fish, or marine mammal
         origin; vegetable oils, including oils from
         seeds, nuts, fruits, or kernels; and, other
         oils and greases, including petroleum, fuel
         oil, sludge, synthetic oils, mineral oils, oil
         refuse, or oil mixed with wastes other than
         dredged spoil.

         Note: The above text is an excerpt of the SPCC rule.
         Refer to 40 CFR part 112 for the full text of the rule.
       The U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) compiled a list of substances it considers oil, based on the
CWA definition.  The list is available on the USCG Web site.1  Note, however, that the USCG list is
not comprehensive and does not define "oil" for purposes of 40 CFR part 112. EPA may determine
that a substance, chemical, material, or mixture is an oil even if it is not on the USCG list.

2.2.1   Animal Fats and Vegetable Oils

       Oil covered under the SPCC regulation is further described in 40 CFR 112.2 as including
"fats, oils, or greases of animal, fish, or marine mammal origin; vegetable oils, including oils from
seeds, nuts, fruits, or kernels; and, other oils and greases, including petroleum, fuel oil, sludge,
synthetic oils, mineral oils, oil refuse, or oil mixed with wastes other than dredged spoil." Oil
includes animal fats and vegetable oils.

2.2.2   Synthetic Oils

       The SPCC rule applies to synthetic oils. Synthetic oils are used in a wide range of
applications, including as heat transfer fluids, engine fluids, hydraulic and transmission fluids,
metalworking fluids, dielectric fluids, compressor lubricants, and turbine lubricants. Synthetic oils
are created by chemical synthesis rather than by refining  petroleum crude or extracting from plant
seeds.  The base materials from which synthetic oils are synthesized include glycols, esters,
polyalphaolefins, aromatics, silicone fluids, Group III base oils, and  others. Because of their origin,
synthetic oils are generally covered under subpart B of 40 CFR 112, which covers "petroleum oils
and non-petroleum oils..." Certain oils are synthesized from plant material, and thus may be
considered with animal fats and vegetable oils under subpart C of 40 CFR part 112, which, as
         1 See the "List of Petroleum and Non-Petroleum Oils" on the USCG Web site at
  http://www.uscg.mil/vrp/faq/oil.shtml.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
2-3
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
discussed below, applies to "animal fats and oils and greases, and fish and marine mammal oils;
and...vegetable oils, including oils from seeds, nuts, fruits, and kernels."
2.2.3  Determination of "Oil" for Natural Gas and Hazardous Substances

       Natural Gas

       Natural gas (including liquid natural gas and liquid petroleum gas) is not considered an oil.
EPA does not consider highly volatile liquids that volatilize on contact with air or water, such as
liquid natural gas or liquid petroleum gas, to be oil (67 FR 47076). Petroleum  distillate or oil that is
produced by natural gas wells and stored at atmospheric pressure and temperature (commonly
referred to as condensate or drip gas), however, is considered an oil.
       Dry gas production facilities are not subject to the SPCC rule. A dry gas production facility
produces natural gas from a well (or wells) but does not also produce condensate or crude oil that
can be drawn off the tanks, containers, or other production equipment at the facility. EPA has
clarified that a dry gas production facility does not meet the description of an "oil production, oil
recovery, or oil recycling facility" for which the wastewater treatment exemption would apply under
§1 12.1 (d)(6).2 See excerpt below:
 Notice Concerning Certain Issues Pertaining to the July 2002 Spill Prevention, Control,
 and Countermeasure (SPCC) Rule, (May 25, 2004)

        The Agency has been asked whether produced water tanks at dry gas facilities are eligible for the
 SPCC rule's wastewater treatment exemption at 40 CFR  112.7(d)(6). A dry gas production facility is a
 facility that produces natural gas from a well (or wells) from which it does not also produce condensate or
 crude oil that can be drawn off the tanks, containers or other production equipment at the facility.

        The SPCC rule's wastewater treatment exemption excludes from 40 CFR part 112 "any facility or
 part thereof used exclusively for wastewater treatment and not used to satisfy any requirement of this
 part." However, for the purposes of the exemption, the "production, recovery, or recycling of oil is not
 wastewater treatment." In interpreting this provision, the  preamble to the final rule states that the Agency
 does "not consider wastewater treatment facilities or parts thereof at an oil production, oil recovery, or oil
 recycling facility to be wastewater treatment for purposes of this paragraph."

        It is our view that a dry gas production facility (as described above) would not be excluded from
 the wastewater treatment exemption  based on the view that it constitutes an "oil production, oil recovery,
 or oil recycling facility." As discussed in the  preamble to the July 2002 rulemaking, "the goal of an oil
 production, oil recovery, or oil recycling facility is to maximize the production or recovery of oil.  ..." 67 FR
 47068.  A dry gas facility does not meet this description.

 See 69 FR  29729, 29730.
       Wet gas production facilities are subject to the SPCC rule. In addition to natural gas, wet
gas production facilities produce condensate or crude oil that can be drawn off the tanks,
          "Notice Concerning Certain Issues Pertaining to the July 2002 Spill Prevention, Control, and
  Countermeasure (SPCC) Rule," 69 FR 29728. May 25, 2004.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
2-4
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
                                                                      Chapter 2: Applicability
containers, or other production equipment at the facility. Since wet gas production facilities produce
and store condensate, which is considered an oil, they are regulated under the SPCC rule.

       Hazardous Substances and Hazardous Waste
       The definition of "oil" in §112.2 includes "oil mixed with wastes other than dredged spoil."
Oils covered under the SPCC rule therefore include certain hazardous substances or hazardous
wastes that are mixed with oil, as well as certain hazardous substances or hazardous wastes that
are themselves oils.  Containers storing these substances may also be covered by other
regulations, such as the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), or the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), also known as Superfund.
Inspectors should evaluate whether containers storing hazardous substances or mixtures of wastes
contain oil.  Although the rule contains an exemption for completely buried tanks that are subject to
all underground storage tank (UST) technical requirements of 40 CFR part 280 and/or a state
program approved under part 281, tanks containing RCRA hazardous wastes are not subject to the
UST rules, and therefore are not exempt under §112.1{d)(2)(i) or (4) if they contain oil.

       Hazardous substances that are neither oils nor mixed with oils are not subject to SPCC rule
requirements.

2.2.4  Activities Involving Oil
       Section 112.1(b) specifies that the owners or
operators of facilities involved in one or more of the
following oil-related activities are regulated under the
SPCC rule, provided they meet the other applicability
criteria in §112.1: "drilling, producing, gathering,
storing, processing, refining, transferring, distributing,
using, or consuming oil and oil products."  Table 2-1
provides examples of these activities.
        ...this part applies to any owner or operator
        of a non-transportation-related onshore or
        offshore facility engaged in drilling,
        producing, gathering, storing,
        processing, refining, transferring,
        distributing, using, or consuming oil and
        oil products....

        Note: The above text is an excerpt of the SPCC rule.
        Emphasis added. Refer to 40 CFR part 112 for the
        full text of the rule.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
2-5
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
Table 2-1. Examples of oil-related activities that may be regulated under 40 CFR part 112.
Activity
Drilling
Producing
Gathering
Storing
Processing
Refining
Transferring
Distributing
Using
Consuming
Examples of Oil-related Regulated Activities
Drilling a well to extract crude oil or natural gas and associated products (such as wet
natural gas) from a subsurface field.
Extracting product from a well and separating the crude oil and/or gas from other
associated products (e.g., water, sediment).
Collecting oil from numerous wells, tank batteries, or platforms and transporting it to a
main storage facility, processing plant, or shipping point.
Storing oil in containers prior to use, while being used, or prior to further distribution in
commerce.
Treating oil using a series of processes to prepare the oil for commercial use,
consumption, further refining, manufacturing, or distribution.
Separating crude oil into different types of hydrocarbons through distillation, cracking,
reforming, and other processes; separating animal fats and vegetable oils from free fatty
acids and other impurities.
Transferring oil between containers, such as between a railcar or tank truck and a bulk
storage container, or between stock tanks and manufacturing equipment.
Selling or marketing oil for further commerce or moving oil using equipment such as
highway vehicles, railroad cars, or pipeline systems. Note that businesses commonly
referred to as oil distributors and retailers commonly are also "storing" oil, as described
above.
Using oil for mechanical or operational purposes in a manner that does not significantly
reduce the quantity of oil, such as using oil to lubricate moving parts, provide insulation, or
for other purposes in electrical equipment, electrical transformers, and hydraulic
equipment.
Consuming oil in a manner that reduces the amount of oil, such as burning as fuel in a
generator.
2.3   "Non-transportation-related" Facilities - EPA/DOT Jurisdiction

2.3.1   Definition of Facility

      The extent of a "facility" under SPCC depends on site-specific circumstances. Factors that
may be considered relevant in delineating the boundaries of a facility for SPCC purposes may
include, but are not limited to:

      *      Ownership, management, and operation of the buildings, structures, equipment,
             installations, pipes, or pipelines on the site;
             Similarity in functions, operational characteristics, and types of activities occurring at
             the site;
             Adjacency; or
US. Environmental Protection Agency
2-6
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
                                                                       Chapter 2: Applicability
                                                      §112.2
                                                      Facility means any mobile or fixed,
                                                      onshore or offshore building, structure,
                                                      installation, equipment, pipe, or pipeline
                                                      (other than a vessel or a public vessel)
                                                      used in oil well drilling operations, oil
                                                      production, oil refining, oil storage, oil
                                                      gathering, oil processing, oil transfer, oil
                                                      distribution, and waste treatment, or in
                                                      which oil is used, as described in Appendix
                                                      A to this part.  The boundaries of a facility
                                                      depend on several site-specific factors,
                                                      including, but not limited to, the ownership
                                                      or operation of buildings, structures, and
                                                      equipment on the same site and the types
                                                      of activity at the site.

                                                      Note: The above text is an excerpt of the SPCC rule.
                                                      Refer to 40 CFR part 112 for the full text of the rule.
       •       Shared drainage pathways (e.g., same
              receiving waterbodies).

       The facility owner or operator, or a
Professional Engineer (PE) on behalf of the facility
owner/operator, determines what constitutes the
"facility."  Note that the facility determination for
purposes of the SPCC rule should be the same as
that used to determine FRP applicability.

       While the facility owner/operator has some
discretion in defining the parameters of the facility,
the boundaries of a facility should not be drawn to
purposely avoid regulation under 40 CFR part 112.
For example, two contiguous operational areas, each
with 700  gallons in aboveground storage capacity,
that have the same owner,  perform similar functions,
are attended by the same personnel, and are in other ways indistinguishable from each other,
would reasonably be expected to represent a single facility under the SPCC rule, and would
therefore be required to have an SPCC Plan, since the capacity of this facility is above the 1,320-
gallon aboveground threshold. These two operational areas would not be defined as two separate
facilities  under the definition of "facility" in §112.2.

       Alternatively, a single facility may be composed of various  oil-containing areas spread over
a relatively large campus. For instance, different operational areas within a military base may be
considered a single facility. The military base may not necessarily include single-family homes
occupied by military personnel as part of the facility if these are considered personal space similar
to civilian single-family residences.  However, the facility may include larger military barracks for
which a branch of the military controls, operates, and maintains the space.
       If a facility is regulated under the SPCC rule, it is the responsibility of the facility owner and
operator to ensure that an SPCC Plan is prepared. A site may have multiple owners and/or
operators, and therefore can  have several facilities.  Factors to consider in determining which owner
or operator should prepare the Plan include who has control over day-to-day operations of the
facility or particular containers and equipment, who trains the employee(s) involved in oil handling
activities, who will conduct the required inspections and tests, and who will be responsible for
responding to and cleaning up any discharge of oil.  EPA expects that the owners and operators will
cooperate to prepare one or more Plans, as appropriate.

       SPCC facilities include not only permanent facilities with fixed storage and equipment, but
also those that have only standby, temporary, and seasonal storage as described under
§112.1(b)(3), as well as construction facilities.  Mobile facilities are addressed in §112.3(c), which
allows such facilities to create a general Plan, instead of developing a new Plan each time the
facility is moved to a new location.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                                             2-7
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
2.3.2  Determination of Transportation-related and Non-transportation-related Facilities

       Facilities are divided into three categories: transportation-related facilities,
non-transportation-related facilities, and complexes. The determination of transportation-related
and non-transportation-related facilities has been established through a series of Executive Orders
(EOs) and Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs) as described below.

       Onshore and certain offshore non-transportation-related facilities (and portions of a
complex) are subject to the SPCC regulation, provided they meet the other applicability criteria set
forth in §112.1. A facility with both transportation-related and non-transportation-related activities is
a "complex" and is subject to the dual jurisdiction of EPA and DOT. The jurisdiction over a
component of a complex is determined by the activity occurring at that component. An activity
might at one time subject a facility to one agency's jurisdiction, and a different activity at the same
facility using the same structure  or equipment might subject the facility to the jurisdiction of another
agency. Which activity would be subject to EPA jurisdiction and which activity would be subject to
DOT jurisdiction is defined by the 1971 DOT-EPA MOU.

       A1971 MOU between EPA and DOT clarifies the types of facilities, activities, equipment,
and vessels that are meant by the terms "transportation-related onshore and offshore facilities" and
"non-transportation-related onshore and offshore facilities." DOT delegated authority over vessels
and transportation-related onshore and offshore facilities to the Commandant of the U.S. Coast
Guard.3 Sections  of the MOU between EPA and DOT are included in Appendix A of 40 CFR part
112. Section 112.1(d)(1)(ii) specifically exempts from SPCC applicability any equipment, vessels,
or facilities subject to the authority and control of the DOT as defined in this MOU.

       A 1994 MOU among the  Secretary of the Interior, the Secretary of Transportation, and the
Administrator of EPA establishes the jurisdictional responsibilities for offshore facilities, including
pipelines. This MOU can be found in Appendix B of 40 CFR part 112. Section  112.1 (d)(1)(iii)
specifically exempts from SPCC applicability any equipment, vessels, or facilities subject to the
authority of the DOT or DO I as defined in this MOU.

       Table 2-2 provides examples of transportation-related and non-transportation-related
facilities as the concepts apply to the SPCC rule applicability. Some equipment, such as loading
arms and transfer hoses, may be considered either transportation-related or
non-transportation-related depending on their use.
        3 The USCG was reorganized under the Department of Homeland Security in March 2003.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency         2-8                      Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
                                                                         Chapter 2: Applicability
Table 2-2. Examples of transportation-related and non-transportation-related facilities from the
1971  DOT-ERA Memorandum of Understanding.
         Transportation-related Facilities
                {DOT Jurisdiction)
        Non-Transportation-related Facilities
                 (EPA Jurisdiction)
       Onshore and offshore terminal facilities,
       including transfer hoses, loading arms, and
       other equipment used to transfer oil in bulk to
       or from a vessel, including storage tanks and
       appurtenances for the reception of oily ballast
       water or tank washings from vessels
       Transfer hoses, loading arms, and other
       equipment appurtenant to a non-
       transportation-related facility used to transfer
       oil in bulk fo or from a vessel
       Interstate and intrastate onshore and offshore
       pipeline systems
       Highway vehicles and railroad cars that are
       used for the transport of oil	
       Fixed or mobile onshore and offshore oil drilling
       and production facilities
       Oil refining and storage facilities
       Industrial, commercial, agricultural, and public
       facilities that use and store oil
       Waste treatment facilities
       Loading racks, transfer hoses, loading arms,
       and other equipment used to transfer oil in bulk
       fo or from highway vehicles or railroad cars
       Highway vehicles, railroad cars, and  pipelines
       used to transport oil  within confines of non-
       transportation-related facility
2.3.3  EPA/DOT Jurisdiction Scenarios

       This section describes common scenarios that have raised jurisdictional questions regarding
the distinction between transportation-related and non-transportation-related facilities for
applicability of SPCC requirements. Inspectors should evaluate the intended activity carefully
because the determination of jurisdiction is not always straightforward.

       Tank Trucks

       EPA regulates tank trucks as "mobile/portable containers" under the SPCC rule if they
operate exclusively within the confines of a non-transportation-related facility. For example, a tank
truck that moves around within the facility and only leaves the facility to obtain more fuel (oil) would
be considered to distribute fuel exclusively at one facility. This tank truck would be subject to the
SPCC rule if it, or the facility, contained above the regulatory threshold amount {see Section 2.5 of
this document) and there was a reasonable expectation of discharge to navigable waters or
adjoining shorelines.  Similarly, an airport refueler or construction refueler that fuels exclusively at
one site would be subject to the SPCC rule.  However,  if the tank truck distributed fuel to multiple
off-site facilities, the tank truck would be transportation-related, and  regulated by DOT.

       Tank trucks that are used in interstate or intrastate commerce can also be regulated if they
are operating in a fixed, non-transportation mode. For example,  if a home heating oil truck makes
its deliveries, returns to the facility, and parks overnight with a partly filled fuel tank, it is subject to
the SPCC rule if it,  or the facility has a capacity above the threshold amount (see Section 2.5 of this
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
2-9
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspecfors
document), and there is a reasonable expectation of discharge to navigable waters or shorelines.4
However, if the home heating oil truck's fuel tank contains no oil when it is parked at the facility,
other than any residual oil present in an emptied vehicle,  it would be regulated only by DOT.5 For
more information, refer to Chapter 4 of this document (Secondary Containment and Impracticability
Determinations), which discusses secondary containment requirements.

       Railroad Cars

       DOT regulates railroad cars from the time the oil is offered for transportation to a carrier until
the time that it reaches its destination and is accepted by the consignee.  DOT jurisdiction includes
railroad cars that are passing through a facility or are temporarily stopped on a normal route. EPA
regulates railroad cars after the transportation process ends; that is, when the railroad cars are
serving as non-transportation-related storage at an SPCC-regulated facility.  EPA jurisdiction
includes railroad cars that are at their final destination, and/or if loading or unloading has begun.  If
loading/unloading has begun, the railroad car itself may become the non-transportation-related
facility even if no other containers at the property would qualify the property.  To be considered a
non-transportation-related facility, the railroad car must store oil in an amount above the regulatory
threshold, and there must be a reasonable expectation of discharge to navigable waters
       EPA regulates railroad cars under the SPCC rule if they are operating exclusively within the
confines of a non-transportation facility. A railroad car would be subject to the SPCC rule if it, or the
facility, had a capacity above the regulatory threshold amount of oil, and there was a reasonable
expectation of discharge to navigable waters or adjoining shorelines.

       Any Loading/Unloading Activities

       EPA regulates the activity of loading  or unloading oil in bulk into storage containers (such as
those on tank trucks or railroad cars), as well as all equipment involved in this activity (e.g., a hose
or loading arm attached to a storage tank system). A "loading/unloading area" is any area of a
facility where oil is transferred between bulk storage containers and tank trucks or railroad cars.
These areas are subject to the general secondary containment requirements in §112. 7(c). If a
"loading/unloading rack" is present, the requirements of §1 12.7(h) apply to the loading/unloading
rack area.  For more information, refer to Chapter 4 of this document (Secondary Containment and
Impracticability Determinations), which includes a discussion of secondary containment
requirements for loading/unloading areas.
         4 In this case, the facility would include the truck storage capacity in its aggregate capacity determination in
  order to determine whether it is above the 1,320 gallon aboveground threshold for SPCC applicability.

         5 EPA addressed this scenario in a letter from Stephen Heare. Office of Emergency and Remedial
  Response, to Melissa Young of Petroleum Marketers Association of America (2001). See Appendix H.

         6 EPA addressed the applicability of the SPCC rule to railros
  letter to the Safety-Kleen Corporation in July 2000. See Appendix H.

U, S. Environmental Protection Agency         2-10                       Version  1.0,11 /28/2005
6 EPA addressed the applicability of the SPCC rule to railroad cars by addressing specific scenarios in a

-------
                                                                      Chapter 2: Applicability
       Marine Terminals

       A marine terminal is an example of a "complex" that is subject to U.S. Coast Guard (USCG)
and EPA jurisdiction. The USCG regulates the pier structures, transfer hoses, hose-piping
connection, containment, controls, and transfer piping associated with the transfer of oil between a
vessel and an onshore facility. EPA regulates the tanks, internal piping, loading racks, and
vehicle/rail operations that are completely within the non-transportation portion of the facility (33
CFR part 154, Facilities Transferring Oil or Hazardous Material in Bulk). EPA jurisdiction begins at
the first valve inside secondary containment.  If there is  no secondary containment, EPA jurisdiction
begins at the valve or manifold adjacent to the storage tank {33 CFR 154.1020).

       Vessels (Ships/Barges)

       The U.S. Coast Guard regulates the loading or unloading of oil from a  vessel to an onshore
facility, as well as the oil-carrying ship and the connecting piping (33 CFR part 155, Oil or
Hazardous Material Pollution Prevention Regulations for Vessels). In this scenario, a vessel is a
ship or a barge. The oil passes from the USCG's jurisdiction to that of the EPA when it passes the
first valve of the secondary containment for the storage  container.  If there is no secondary
containment, EPA's jurisdiction begins at the first valve or manifold closest to the storage container.
Storage tanks and appurtenances for the reception of oily ballast water or tank washings from
vessels are under USCG jurisdiction.

       Motive Power

       Motive power containers are located in or on a motor vehicle, such as  on-board bulk oil
storage containers used solely to power the movement of a motor vehicle, or ancillary on-board, oil-
filled operational equipment used solely to facilitate its operation.  A motive  power container can be
considered non-transportation-related and subject to the SPCC rule.  However, EPA does not
believe that the intent of the SPCC rule was to regulate  motive power containers, including oil-filled
tanks used to fuel the propulsion of vehicles, such as buses, sport utility vehicles, construction
vehicles, and farm equipment.

       Breakout Tanks

       Breakout tanks are usually used to relieve surges in an oil pipeline system or to receive and
store oil transported by a pipeline for re inject ion and continued transportation  by pipeline.  They are
also sometimes used for bulk storage.  A breakout tank may be regulated by EPA, DOT, or both
depending on how the tank is used. For example, breakout tanks that are used solely to relieve
surges in a pipeline and are not used for any non-transportation-related activity (i.e., pipeline-in and
pipeline-out configuration, with no transfer to other equipment/mode of transportation such as a
tank truck), would be subject to DOT jurisdiction. A bulk storage container used to store oil while
also serving as a breakout tank for a pipeline or other transportation-related purpose would be
US. Environmental Protection Agency
2-11
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
subject to both DOT and EPA jurisdiction.7 For more information, see the EPA and DOT joint
memorandum dated February 4, 2000, which clarifies regulatory jurisdiction over breakout tanks.8

2.4   Reasonable  Expectation of Discharge to Navigable Waters in
       Quantities That May Be Harmful

2.4.1   Definition of "Discharge" and "Discharge as Described in §112.1(b)"

       According to §112.1(b), the SPCC rule applies to facilities that could reasonably be
expected to discharge oil in "quantities that may be harmful, as described in part 110 of this
chapter..." The Discharge of Oil regulation at 40 CFR part 110 (also  referred to as the "sheen rule")
defines a discharge of oil into or upon the navigable waters of the United States or adjoining
shorelines in quantities that may be harmful under the CWA as that which:

             Causes a sheen or discoloration on the surface of the water or adjoining shorelines;
             Causes a sludge or emulsion to be deposited beneath the surface of the water or
             upon adjoining shorelines; or
             Violates an applicable water quality standard.

       A discharge meeting any of the above criteria triggers requirements to report to the National
Response Center (NRC). The failure to report such a discharge may result in criminal sanctions
under the CWA.  The appearance of a "sheen" on the surface of the water is often used as a simple
way to identify harmful discharges of oil that should be reported. The appearance of a sheen,
however, is not a necessary factor; the presence of a sludge or emulsion, or of another deposit of
oil beneath the water surface, or the violation of an applicable water quality standard also indicates
a harmful discharge.

       Section 311 of the CWA defines and prohibits certain discharges of oil.  These requirements
are also codified  in 40 CFR part 112. As defined in §112.2, a "discharge" includes, but is not limited
to, any spilling, leaking,  pumping, pouring, emitting, emptying, or dumping of any amount of oil no
matter where it occurs.  It excludes certain discharges associated with §402 of the CWA and §13 of
the River and Harbor Act of 1899.  The  primary distinction between the §112.2 and §112.1 (b)
definitions of discharge is that a discharge as described in §112.1(b) is a violation of §311 of the
Clean Water Act, whereas a §112.2 discharge (i.e., one that does not impact a navigable water or
adjoining shoreline) is not a violation. For example, if a tank leaks a puddle of oil into a facility's
basement, this would be considered a discharge of oil, but is not necessarily a violation of the CWA
because the oil did not reach a navigable water or adjoining shoreline (and would not be a
discharge as described in §112.1(b)).
        7 See also the 1971 MOU between DOT and EPA (Appendix A of 40 CFR part 112). and EPA/DOT memo
  "Jurisdiction over Breakout Tanks/Bulk Oil Storage Tanks (Containers) at Transportation-Related and Non-
  Transportation-Related Facilities" for specific examples of dual jurisdiction. See Appendices A and H.

        8 See Appendix H.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency        2-12                      Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
                                                                       Chapter 2: Applicability
       The SPCC regulation includes requirements for corrective action as well as additional
reporting requirements.  For example, in §112.8(c)(10), a facility is required to promptly correct
visible discharges that result in a loss of oil from a container. A discharge of any amount would
need to be cleaned up, but would not be considered a violation of the spill prohibition (a discharge
as described in §112.1(b)), unless it impacts a navigable water or adjoining shoreline.  Additionally,
if a facility discharged more than 42 gallons of oil in each of two discharges as described in
§112.1(b)overa 12-month period, the facility would be required to report each spill to the NRC,
clean up the spill, and submit a report to the Regional Administrator, and may be required to amend
its Plan. The same is true if the facility has a single discharge as described in §112.1(b) of more
than 1,000 gallons.  For more information on these reporting requirements, see §112.4 of the rule.

2.4.2  Reasonable Expectation of Discharge
       The SPCC rule applies only to facilities that,
due to their location, can reasonably be expected to
discharge oil as described in §112.1(b). The rule
does not define the  term "reasonably be expected."
The owner or operator of each facility must determine
the potential for a discharge from his/her facility.
According to §112.1(d)(1)(i), this determination must
be based solely upon  consideration of the
geographical and locational aspects of the facility. An
owner or operator should consider the location of the
facility in relation to  a stream, ditch, gully, or storm
sewer; the volume of material likely to be spilled;
drainage patterns; and soil conditions. An owner or
operator may not consider constructed features, such
as dikes, equipment, or other manmade structures that
discharge as described in §112.1(b), when making this
          §112.1 (b)
          ...this part applies to any owner or operator
          of a non-transportation-related onshore or
          offshore facility engaged in drilling,
          producing, gathering, storing, processing,
          refining, transferring, distributing, using, or
          consuming oil and oil products, which due
          to its location, could reasonably be
          expected to discharge oil in quantities
          that may be harmful, as described in
          part 110 of this chapter....

          Note: The above text is an excerpt of the SPCC rule.
          Emphasis added. Refer to 40 CFR part 112 for the
          full text of the rule.
       prevent, contain, hinder, or restrain a
       decision.
       A facility owner or operator, however, should consider the presence of manmade structures
that may serve to convey discharged oil to navigable waters, such as sanitary or storm water
drainage systems, even if they lead to a publicly owned treatment work (POTW) prior to ultimate
discharge into navigable waters. The presence of a treatment system such as a POTW cannot be
used to determine that the facility is not reasonably expected to discharge to navigable waters or
adjoining shorelines. POTWs can fail to contain oil. They are not designed to handle oil discharges
and are on occasion forced to bypass to receiving waterbodies during extreme weather events or
when upsets occur in the treatment system.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
2-13
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
       The following factors may prove useful to consider in determining whether there is a
reasonable expectation of discharge:

       *      Whether a past discharge of oil reached a navigable water or adjoining shoreline,
             which indicates that another could be reasonably expected;
       •      Whether the facility is adjacent to navigable waters and a discharge to the navigable
             waters could be reasonably expected;
             Whether on-site conduits, such as sewer lines, storm sewers, and certain
             underground features (e.g., power or cable lines, or groundwater), could facilitate the
             transport of discharged oil off-site to  navigable waters;
       •      Whether a unique geological or geographic feature would facilitate the transport of
             discharged oil off-site to navigable waters;
       •      Whether the facility is near a watercourse and intervening natural drainage;
       •      Whether precipitation runoff could transport oil into navigable waters; and
             The quantity and nature of oil stored.

2,4.3  Geographic Scope

       EPA revised the geographic scope of the SPCC regulation in 2002 to be more consistent
with the CWA. Formerly, the geographic scope of the rule extended to navigable waters of the
United States and adjoining shorelines. The rule reflects the full geographic scope of EPA's
authority to include a discharge:

             Into or upon the waters of the contiguous zone;
             In connection with activities under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act or the
             Deepwater Port Act of 1974; or
             That may affect natural resources belonging to, appertaining to, or under the
             exclusive management authority of the United States (including resources under the
             Magnuson Fishery Conservation and Management Act).

       The rule's scope includes discharges harmful not only to the public health and welfare, but
also to the environment through the protection of natural resources. Such protection would apply to
resources under the Magnuson Fishery Conservation and Management Act, a statute that
establishes exclusive U.S. management authority over all fishing within the exclusive economic
zone (inner boundary coterminous with the seaward boundary of each coastal state), and all
anadromous fish throughout their migratory range except when in a foreign nation's waters, and all
fish on the continental shelf.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency        2-14                     Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
                                                                            Chapter 2: Applicability
2.4.4  Definition of "Navigable Waters"
       Section 112.2 provides the SPCC rule's definition of "navigable waters." See the text box
below.
 §112.2
 Navigable waters means the waters of the United States, including the territorial seas.
    (1) The term includes:
    (i) All waters that are currently used, were used in the past, or may be susceptible to use in interstate
 or foreign commerce, including all waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide;
    (ii) All interstate waters, including interstate wetlands;
    (Hi) All other waters such as intrastate lakes,  rivers,  streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats,
 sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes, or natural ponds, the use,
 degradation, or destruction of which could affect interstate or foreign commerce including any such
 waters:
    (A) That are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes; or
    (B) From which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign  commerce; or,
    (C) That are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce;
    (iv) All impoundments of waters otherwise defined as waters of the United States under this section;
    (v) Tributaries of waters identified in paragraphs (1)(i)  through (iv)  of this definition;
    (vi) The territorial sea; and
    (vii) Wetlands adjacent to waters (other than waters that are themselves wetlands) identified in
 paragraph (1) of this definition.
    (2) Waste treatment systems, including treatment ponds or lagoons designed to meet the
 requirements of the CWA (other than cooling ponds which also meet the criteria of this definition) are not
 waters of the United States. Navigable waters do not include prior converted cropland. Notwithstanding
 the determination of an area's status as prior converted cropland by any other Federal agency, for the
 purposes of the CWA, the final  authority regarding CWA jurisdiction remains with EPA.

 Note: The above text is an excerpt of the SPCC rule. Refer to 40 CFR  part 112 for the full text of the rule.
       See "Joint Memorandum of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and EPA providing clarifying
guidance regarding the Supreme Court's decision in Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County
v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, 531 U.S. 159 (2001) (SWANCC)),"9 68 FR 1995,
January 15, 2003.
          There is currently pending a petiton for review challenging the definition of "navigable waters" in 40 CFR
  112.2., American Petroleum Institute v. Leavitt, No. 1:102CV02247 PLF and consolidated cases (D.O.C. filed Nov. 14,
  2002).
US. Environmental Protection Agency
2-15
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
                                                       Except as provided in paragraph (f) of this
                                                       section, this part does not apply to:...
                                                       (2) Any facility which, although otherwise
                                                       subject to the jurisdiction of EPA, meets
                                                       both of the following requirements:
                                                       (i) The completely buried storage capacity
                                                       of the facility is 42,000 gallons or less of
                                                       oil. ...
                                                       (ii) The aggregate aboveground storage
                                                       capacity of the facility is 1,320 gallons or
                                                       less of oil....

                                                       Note: The above text is an excerpt of the SPCC rule.
                                                       Refer to 40 CFR part 112 for the full text of the rule.
2.5   Storage Capacity
2.5,1   Capacity Thresholds

       The SPCC rule applies to a facility that has
more than 42,000 gallons of completely buried oil
storage capacity or more than 1,320 gallons of
aggregate aboveground oil storage capacity, provided
it meets the other applicable criteria set forth in
§112.1.

       According to §112.1{b)(1) through (4), the rule
is applicable to eligible facilities that have oil in
aboveground containers; completely buried tanks;
containers that are used for standby storage, for seasonal storage, or for temporary storage, or are
not otherwise "permanently closed"; and "bunkered tanks" or "partially buried tanks" or containers in
a vault. Containers include not only oil storage tanks, but also mobile or portable containers such
as drums and totes, and oil-filled equipment such as electrical equipment (e.g., transformers, circuit
breakers), manufacturing flow-through process equipment, and operational equipment. However,
§112.1(d)(2) limits the applicability to facilities with oil capacity above specific threshold amounts.
       Once a facility is subject to the rule, all aboveground containers and completely buried tanks
are subject to the rule requirements (unless these containers are otherwise exempt from the
regulation, as is the case for containers smaller than
55 gallons). For example, a facility could have 10,000
gallons of aggregate aboveground storage capacity in
tanks and oil-filled equipment of 55 gallons or more,
and a completely buried tank of 10,000 gallons that is
not subject to all of the technical requirements of 40
CFR part 280 or a state program approved under part
281 (and therefore not exempt). Since the
aboveground storage capacity exceeds 1,320
gallons, all of the tanks and oil-filled equipment,
including the buried tank, are subject to the SPCC
rule.
                                                      §112.2
                                                      Completely buried tank means any
                                                      container completely below grade and
                                                      covered with earth, sand, gravel, asphalt,
                                                      or other material. Containers in vaults,
                                                      bunkered tanks, or partially buried tanks
                                                      are considered aboveground storage
                                                      containers for purposes of this part.

                                                      Note: The above text is an excerpt of the SPCC rule.
                                                      Refer to 40 CPR part 112 for the full text of the rule.
2.5.2  Storage Capacity Calculation

       Sections 112.1(d)(2){i) and (ii) clarify which containers are included and excluded when
calculating total storage capacity at a facility in determining whether it exceeds the volume limits in
the rule.  These containers are discussed below and summarized in Table 2-3.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                                            2-16
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
                                                                      Chapter 2: Applicability
       What to Count
              All containers of oil with a capacity of 55 gallons or greater are to be counted (unless
              listed below) when calculating total oil storage capacity at a facility.
       What Not to Count
       •      Permanently closed containers are not counted when calculating total oil storage
              capacity. "Permanently closed," as defined in §112.2, refers to containers "for which
              (1) All liquid and sludge has been removed from each container and connecting line;
              and (2) All connecting lines and piping have been disconnected from the container
              and blanked off, all valves (except for ventilation valves) have been closed and
              locked, and conspicuous signs have  been posted on each container stating that it is
              a permanently closed container and noting the date of closure."

              Completely buried tanks, as defined in §112.2, and connected underground piping,
              underground ancillary equipment, and containment systems that are currently
              subject to all of the technical requirements of 40 CFR part 280 or all of the technical
              requirements of a state program approved under 40 CFR part 281  are not counted.
              Such tanks must still be marked on the facility diagram as provided in §112.7(a)(3).
              "Completely buried tank" as defined in §112.2 refers to "any container completely
              below grade and covered with earth,  sand, gravel, asphalt, or other material.
              Containers in vaults, bunkered tanks, or partially buried tanks are considered
              aboveground storage containers for purposes of this part."

Table 2-3. Summary of storage capacity calculation as described in §112.1(d)(2)(i) and (ii).
Included
Capacity of containers (e.g., bulk
storage containers, oil-filled
equipment, mobile/portable
containers) with a capacity of 55
gallons or greater
Excluded
Capacity of completely buried tank and associated underground
piping, ancillary equipment, and containment systems subject to all
technical requirements of 40 CFR part 280 or a state-approved
program under 40 CFR part 281
Capacity of containers that are permanently closed
2.5.3  Definition of Storage Capacity

       Under the SPCC rule, if a container has the
requisite capacity, it does not matter whether the
container is actually filled to that capacity. The
storage capacity of a container is defined as the shell
capacity of the container. If a certain portion  of a
container is incapable of storing oil because of its
         §112.2
         Storage capacity of a container means the
         shell capacity of the container.

         Mote: The above text is an excerpt of the SPCC rule.
         See 40 CFR part 112 for the full text of the rule.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
2-17
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
integral design (e.g., mechanical equipment or other interior components take up space), then the
shell capacity of the container is reduced to the volume the container might hold (67 FR 47081).
Generally, the shell capacity is the rated design capacity rather than the working/operational
capacity.

2.5.4   Tank Re-rating

       Shell capacity should be used as the measure of storage capacity, unless changes are
made to the design shell capacity in a permanent non-reversible manner. For example, when the
integral design of a container has been altered by actions such as drilling a hole in the side of the
container so that it cannot hold oil above that point, shell capacity remains the measure of storage
capacity because such alteration can be altered again at will to restore the former storage  capacity.
When the alteration is an action such as the installation  of a double bottom or new floor to the
container, the integral design of the container has changed, and may result in a reduction in shell
capacity.

       An addition or modification to a field-erected storage tank should be performed in
accordance with industry standards and the original design specifications. Relevant industry
standards include American Petroleum Institute (API) Standard 653 Tank Inspection, Repairs,
Alteration, and Reconstruction" (API-653). This standard includes additions or modifications to shell
penetrations such as overfill diverters. However, even where such modifications are done in
accordance with standards, the tank  may not be considered re-rated to a lower capacity; the
capacity remains equal to the original rated shell capacity.  An owner or operator may reduce the
capacity of a tank only by changing the shell dimensions (i.e., by removing shell plate sections).
Since SPCC requirements  are based on shell capacity, modifying a vent, overflow, or other tank
appurtenances that reduce the working fill capacity does not affect SPCC requirements, including
facility capacity determination and secondary containment requirements.

2.6   Exemptions  to the  Requirements of the SPCC Rule
       In addition to the criteria described
above, §112.1(d) describes certain types of
additional equipment and facilities that are
exempted from SPCC rule  requirements.

2.6.1   Facilities Subject to  Minerals
       Management Service Regulations

       Section 112.1(d)(3)  excludes offshore oil
drilling, production, or workover facilities that are
subject to notices and regulations of the
Minerals Management Service (MMS).  MMS
regulations require adequate  spill prevention,
    Except as provided in paragraph (f) of this
    section, this part does not apply to:...
    (3) Any offshore oil drilling, production, or
    workover facility that is subject to the notices and
    regulations of the Minerals Management Service,
    as specified in the Memorandum of
    Understanding between the Secretary of
    Transportation, the Secretary of the Interior, and
    the Administrator of EPA, dated November 8,
    1993 (Appendix B of this part).

    Note: The above text is an excerpt of the SPCC rub. Refer to
    40 CFR part 112 for the full text of the rule.
US. Environmental Protection Agency
2-18
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
                                                                     Chapter 2: Applicability
control, and countermeasures that are directed more specifically to the facilities subject to the
regulations. The facilities are regulated by the Department of Interior as specified in the DOI-DOT-
EPA MOU (40 CFR part 112, Appendix B).

2.6.2  Underground Storage Tanks

       Under §112.1(d}(4), the SPCC rule exempts completely buried storage tanks, as well as
connected underground piping, underground ancillary equipment, and containment systems, when
such tanks are subject to ail of the technical requirements of 40 CFR part 280 or a state program
approved under 40 CFR part 281 (also known as the Underground  Storage Tank regulations).
Although these tanks are exempt from the SPCC requirements, they must still be marked on the
facility diagram if the facility is otherwise subject to the SPCC rule (§112.7(a)(3)).
       The regulations at 40 CFR parts 280 and 281
comprise the Underground Storage Tank (UST)
Program, which requires owners and operators of
new tanks and tanks already in the ground to
prevent, detect, and clean up releases. The UST
program defines USTs differently than the SPCC
rule does. The UST Program considers an
underground storage tank to be a tank and any
underground piping that has at least 10 percent of its
combined volume underground. However, under the
SPCC rule, only completely buried tanks subject to
all of the technical UST Program requirements are
exempt from the rule. Any tanks that are  not
completely buried are considered aboveground
storage tanks and subject to the SPCC rule.
        Except as provided in paragraph (f) of this
        section, this part does not apply to:...
        (4) Any completely buried storage tank, as
        defined in §112.2, and connected
        underground piping, underground ancillary
        equipment, and containment systems, at
        any facility, that is subject to all of the
        technical requirements of part 280 of this
        chapter or a State program approved under
        part 281 of this chapter, except that such a
        tank must be marked on the facility diagram
        as provided in §112.7(a)(3), if the facility is
        otherwise subject to this part.

        Note: The above text is an excerpt of the SPCC rule.
        Refer to 40 CFR part 112 for the full text of the rule.
       The following are either excluded from the definition of UST or are exempt from the UST
regulations at 40 CFR part 280 (and therefore may be subject to the SPCC rule, if the completely
buried tanks contain oil):

             Tanks with a capacity of 110 gallons or less;
             Farm or residential tanks with a capacity of 1,100 gallons or less used for storing
             motor fuel for non-commerciat purposes;
             Tanks used for storing heating oil for consumptive use on the premises where
             stored;
             Tanks storing non-petroleum oils, such as animal fat or vegetable oil;
             Tanks on or above the floor of underground areas (e.g., basements or tunnels);
             Septic tanks and systems for collecting storm water and wastewater;
             Flow-through process tanks;
             Emergency spill and overfill tanks that are expeditiously emptied after use;
             Surface impoundments, pits, ponds, or lagoons;
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
2-19
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
       •      Any UST system holding RCRA hazardous waste;
              Any equipment or machinery that contains regulated substances for operational
              purposes;
              Liquid trap or associated gathering lines directly related to oil or gas production or
              gathering operations;
              Pipeline facilities regulated under the Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act of 1968, the
              Hazardous Liquid Pipeline Safety Act of 1979, or intrastate pipelines regulated under
              state laws comparable to the provisions of above laws;10 and
              Any UST system that contains de minimis concentration of regulated substances.

The following are examples of deferrals from the UST regulations (and therefore may be subject to
the SPCC rule):

              Wastewater treatment tank systems;
              Any UST systems containing radioactive materials that are regulated under the
              Atomic Energy Act of 1954;
       •      UST systems that are part of emergency generator systems at nuclear power
              generation facilities;
       *      Airport hydrant fuel distribution  systems; and
       *      UST systems with field-constructed tanks.

       Note that additional and/or more stringent requirements may exist in a state-approved
program under 40 CFR part 281 and that they may also impact SPCC applicability. For example, a
state may choose to regulate a UST used for storing heating oil for consumptive use on the
premises where stored. Thus, under the state program the UST is subject to all the technical
requirements of a 40 CFR part 281 program and not regulated by the SPCC rule.  Inspectors
should consider any state UST program approved
under 40 CFR part 281 when addressing applicability
issues associated with completely buried tanks.
2.6.3  Wastewater Treatment Facilities

       The wastewater treatment exemption,
outlined in §112.1(d)(6), excludes from the SPCC
requirements facilities or parts of facilities that are
used exclusively for wastewater treatment, and are
not used to meet 40 CFR part 112 requirements.
         Except as provided in paragraph (f) of this
         section, this part does not apply to: ..
         (6) Any facility or part thereof used
         exclusively for wastewater treatment and not
         used to satisfy any requirement of this part.
         The production, recovery, or recycling of oil
         is not wastewater treatment for purposes of
         this paragraph.

         Note: The above text is an excerpt of the SPCC rule.
         Refer to 40 CFR part 112 for the full text of the rule.
       Many of the wastewater treatment facilities or
parts thereof are subject to the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) or state-
         10
          Although exempt from UST regulations, pipeline facilities regulated under the Natural Gas Pipeline Safety
  Act of 1968, the Hazardous Liquid Pipeline Safety Act of 1979. or intrastate pipelines regulated under state laws
  comparable to the provisions of above laws do not generally come within EPA's jurisdiction and are not generally
  regulated under the SPCC rule.  See Section 2.3.2 of this document.
US. Environmental Protection Agency
2-20
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
                                                                     Chapter 2: Applicability
equivalent permitting requirements that involve operating and maintaining the facility to prevent
discharges. The NPDES or state-equivalent process ensures review and approval of the facility's
plans and specifications; operation/maintenance manuals and procedures; and Storm Water
Pollution Prevention Plans, which may include Best Management Practice (BMP) Plans (67 FR
47068).

       For the purposes of the exemption, the production, recovery, or recycling of oil is not
considered wastewater treatment.  These activities generally lack NPDES or state-equivalent
permits and thus lack the protections that such permits provide. Additionally, the goal of an oil
production, oil recovery, or oil recycling facility is to maximize the production or recovery of oil, while
eliminating impurities in the oil, including water, whereas the goal of a wastewater treatment facility
is to purify water (67 FR 47068-69).

       The exemption does not apply to a wastewater treatment facility or part thereof that is used
to store oil; in that instance, the oil storage capacity must be counted as part of the total facility
storage capacity (see 67 FR 47068). For example, if there is a 600-gallon storage container that
contains oil removed from an exempt oil/water separator and a 1,000-gallon storage container on
site, the total aboveground storage capacity for the facility would be 1,600 gallons, and the facility
may potentially be regulated by the SPCC rule.

       In addition, the exemption does not apply to a wastewater treatment facility or parts thereof
used to meet  a 40 CFR part 112 requirement, including an oil/water separator used to meet  any
SPCC  requirement.  Examples of oil/water separators that are used to meet SPCC requirements
include oil/water separators used to satisfy the secondary containment requirements of §112.7(c),
§112.7(h)(1),  and/or §112.8(c)(2).  Oil/water separators used to satisfy secondary containment
requirements  of the rule do not count toward storage capacity.  For more information, refer to
Chapter 5 of this document (Oil/Water Separators), which clarifies how the SPCC rule applies to
oil/water separators.

2.7   Determination of Applicability by the Regional  Administrator
       Section 112.1(f) allows the Regional
Administrator (RA) to require preparation of an SPCC
Plan or applicable part by the owner or operator of an
otherwise exempted facility that is subject to EPA
jurisdiction under CWA §311 (j) of the CWA. This
provision is designed to address gaps in other
regulatory regimes that might best be remedied by
requiring a facility to have an SPCC Plan.  For
example, a facility may be exempted from the SPCC
rule because its storage capacity is below the
regulatory threshold, but the facility may have been
the cause of repeated discharges as described in §112.
                                                    Notwithstanding paragraph (d) of this
                                                    section, the Regional Administrator may
                                                    require that the owner or operator of any
                                                    facility subject jurisdiction of EPA under
                                                    section 311 (j) of the CWA prepare and
                                                    implement an SPCC Plan, or any
                                                    applicable  part, to carry out the purposes
                                                    of the CWA.

                                                    Note: The above text is an excerpt of the SPCC rule.
                                                    Refer to 40 C FR part 112 for the full text of the rule.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                                           2-21
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
       Factors the RA may consider in making a determination to require that a facility prepare an
SPCC Plan include, but are not limited to, the physical characteristics of the facility; the presence of
secondary containment; the discharge history of the facility; and the proximity of the facility to
sensitive environmental areas such as wetlands, parks,  or wildlife refuges.  The RA might require
an entire Plan, or might require only a partial Plan addressing secondary containment, for example,
to prevent future discharges.

       Sections 112.1(f){1) through (5) describe the process for an RA to determine applicability.
The process includes specific time deadlines for both the RA and the facility owner or operator, as
well as requirements for the type of information and delivery method.  Table 2-4 lists the deadlines
and responsibilities of the RA and the facility owner or operator to appeal the RA determination that
he/she must prepare an SPCC Plan.

Table 2-4.  Process for an RA determination of SPCC applicability and appeals.
Deadline
Responsibility
Determination
N/A
Within 30 days of receipt of notice of a
potential need to prepare an SPCC
Plan (following preliminary
determination)
Within 30 days of receipt of data
Within 6 months of final determination
that facility needs a Plan
Within 1 year of final determination that
facility needs a Plan
Regional Administrator (RA.) makes a preliminary determination.
RA must provide a written notice to the owner/operator stating the
reasons why an SPCC Plan or applicable part of a Plan is
needed. (§11 2.1 (f)(1))
Owner/operator must provide information and data and may
consult with EPA about the need to prepare an SPCC Plan, or
applicable part. (§112.1(f)(2»
Regional Administrator (RA) must make a final determination
regarding whether the owner/operator is required to prepare and
implement an SPCC Plan, or applicable part. (§112.1{f)(3))
Owner/operator must prepare the Plan, or applicable part.
(§112.1(f)(4))
Owner/operator must implement the Plan, or applicable part.
(§112.1(f){4))
Appeals
Within 30 days of receipt of final
determination that facility needs a Plan
Within 60 days of receiving the appeal
or additional information submitted by
owner/operator
Owner/operator may appeal final determination to the
Administrator of EPA (and send a copy to the RA). (§112.1(f)(5))
The Administrator must render a decision on the appeal.
(§112.1(f)(5))
       The EPA inspector plays an important role in assisting the RA in determining applicability.
For example, an inspector may initially alert the RA of the need for an otherwise exempt facility to
have an SPCC Plan. This may result from an inspection prompted by a citizen complaint or state
referral, an oil spill, or awareness of other conditions that warrant closer examination. Following an
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
2-22
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
                                                                      Chapter 2: Applicability
RA determination of the need for an SPCC Plan, the EPA inspector may perform a targeted
inspection of the subject facility to verify compliance with SPCC requirements.

2.8    SPCC Applicability for Different Types of Containers

2.8.1   Bulk Storage Container
       A bulk storage container, as defined in
§112.2, must follow specific requirements, as
described under §§112.8(c), 112.9(c), and
112.12(c) for onshore facilities. Examples of these
requirements include, but are not limited to,
secondary containment and fail-safe engineering,
such as high level alarms, inspections, and
testing.

2.8.2   Oil-filled Equipment
      §112.2
      Bulk storage container means any container
      used to store oil. These containers are used
      for purposes including, but not limited to, the
      storage of oil prior to use, while being used,
      or prior to further distribution in commerce.
      Oil-filled electrical, operating, or
      manufacturing equipment is not a bulk
      storage container.

      Note: The above text is an excerpt of the SPCC rule.
      Emphasis added.  Refer to 40 CFR part 112 for the full
      text of the rule.
       The definition of bulk storage container in §112.2 specifically excludes oil-filled electrical,
operating, and manufacturing equipment ("oil-filled equipment"). Therefore, oil-filled equipment is
not subject to the bulk storage container requirements in §§112.8(c), 112.9(c), and  112.12(c).
However, oil-filled equipment must meet the general requirements of §112.7. See generally 67 FR
47054-47055.

       EPA believes it is good engineering practice to have some form of visual inspection or
monitoring for this oil-filled equipment to prevent discharges as described in §112.1 (b).  For
example, it is a challenge to comply with security requirements under §112.7(g) and
countermeasures for discharge discovery under §112.7(a)(3)(iv)) without some form of inspection or
monitoring program.  Additionally, inspection and/or monitoring should be part of an effective
contingency plan when a PE determines that secondary containment for this equipment is
impracticable.

       Oil-filled Operational Equipment

       Oil-filled operational equipment includes an oil storage container (or multiple containers) in
which the oil is present solely to support the function of the apparatus or the device. Oil-filled
operational equipment does not include manufacturing equipment.

       Examples of oil-filled operational equipment include hydraulic systems, lubricating systems
(including lubricating systems for pumps, compressors, and other rotating equipment), gear boxes,
machining coolant systems, heat transfer systems, transformers, other electrical equipment, and
other systems containing oil to enable operation.
US. Environmental Protection Agency
2-23
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
       Oil-filled Manufacturing Equipment

       Oil-filled manufacturing equipment is distinct from bulk storage containers in its purpose.
Oil-filled manufacturing equipment stores oil only as an ancillary element of performing a
mechanical or chemical operation to create or modify an intermediate or finished product.
Examples of oil-filled manufacturing equipment may include reaction vessels, fermentors, high
pressure vessels, mixing tanks, dryers, heat exchangers, and distillation columns. Under the SPCC
rule, flow-through process vessels are generally considered oil-filled manufacturing equipment
since they are not intended to store oil.11  Additionally, there may be oil-filled operational equipment
(e.g., a hydraulic unit) at this type of facility to support the manufacturing equipment (see generally
67 FR 47080). The PE reviewing and certifying the SPCC  Plan should be familiar with processes
taking place at the facility and should therefore determine whether a given process vessel is
considered a  bulk storage container or oil-filled manufacturing equipment.

       In cases where a container is used for the static storage of oil within a manufacturing or
processing area, the PE may determine that the container  is in fact a bulk  storage container.
Examples of oil storage within manufacturing areas include:

              Storing an  intermediate product for an extended period of time in a continuous or
              batch process;
              Storing a raw product prior to use in a continuous or batch process; and
       •      Storing a final product after a continuous or  batch process.

       Storage tanks and containers located at the beginning or end of a process and used to store
feedstock or finished products generally are considered bulk storage containers. In cases where oil
storage is incidental to the manufacturing activity or process (e.g., where it is being transformed in a
flow-through process vessel) the PE may determine that the container is part of the manufacturing
equipment.

2.9   Determination  of Applicability of Facility Response Plans

       A portion of the  SPCC-regulated community may also  be required to prepare a Facility
Response Plan (FRP).  According to §112.20, a facility that has the potential to cause substantial
harm to the environment in the event of a discharge must prepare and submit an FRP. SPCC
facilities must document whether they meet the FRP applicability criteria (40 CFR 112 Appendix C
Section 3.0).  Facilities  may refer to the "Flowchart of Criteria for Substantial Harm," Attachment C-l
to Appendix C of 40 CFR  part 112, to determine whether they need to prepare an FRP. The owner
or operator must document his/her determination of whether the facility has the potential to cause
         11 The U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Process Safety Management (PSM) regulation
  (29 CFR 1910.119) considers a single process "any group of vessels which are interconnected and separate vessels
  which are located such that a highly hazardous chemical could be involved in a potential release." The PSM definition
  of process includes storage tanks, while the SPCC rule considers storage tanks as bulk storage containers and not
  manufacturing equipment.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency         2-24                      Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
                                                                   Chapter 2: Applicability
substantial harm by completing the Attachment C-ll form, "Certification of the Applicability of the
Substantial Harm Criteria," and maintaining the certification at the facility. Attachments C-l and C-ll
are provided in Appendix H of this document.

2.10  Role of the EPA Inspector

       The EPA inspector is responsible for gathering information and data to determine
compliance with SPCC requirements for those facilities that are regulated by the SPCC rule.
During an SPCC inspection,  EPA inspectors will check that the measures described in the SPCC
Plan are implemented at the  facility and will fully document all observations and other pertinent
information.  The Summary of Applicability Flowchart and Applicability Assessment Worksheet,
provided as Figures 2-1 and  2-2, are two quick references provided for convenience to aid
inspectors in assessing whether a facility is subject to the SPCC rule.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
2-25
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
Figure 2-1.  Summary of applicability flowchart.
                     , the facility or part of the facility (e.g. complex)
                        considered non-transportation-related?
                               No
                                         Yes
                      Is the facility engaged in drilling, producing,
                        gathering, storing, processing, refining,
                   transferring, distributing, using, or consuming oil?
                               No
                                          I
                                         Yes
                                          *
                      Could the facility reasonably be expected to
                   discharge oil in quantities that may be harmful into
                       navigable waters or adjoining shorelines?
                                          I
                                         Yes
       Is the total aggregate capacity of
      aboveg round oil storage containers
       greater than 1,320 gallons of oil?

      (Do not include containers less than 55
     gallons, permanently closed containers,
      or storage containers used exclusively
           for wastewater treatment)
  Is the total aggregate capacity of
  completely buried storage tanks
 greater than 42,000 gallons of oil?

(Do not include completely buried tanks
subject to all technical requirements of
40 CFR 280/281, containers less than
   55 gallons, permanently closed
containers, or storage containers used
 exclusively for wastewater treatment)
                                         Yes
                                        _*_
                                   The facility IS
                                 subject to SPCC.
                                           The facility IS NOT
                                            subject to SPCC.
    No
The intent of this flowchart is to show the general principles of applicability.  Inspectors should

always consult the Code of Federal Regulations and applicable MOUs.

Definitions (40 CFR 112.2)

Completely buried tank; Any container completely below grade and covered with earth, sand, gravel, asphalt, or other material.
Containers In vaults, bunkered tanks, or partially buried tanks are considered aboveground storage containers for purposes of this part.

Complex: A facility possessing a combination of transportation-related and non-transportation-related components that is subject to the
jurisdiction of more than one Federal agency under section 311 (j) of the CWA.

Facility: Any mobile or fixed, onshore or offshore building, structure, Installation, equipment, pipe or pipeline (other than a vessel or a
public vessel) used in oil well drilling operations, oil production, oil refining, oil storage, oil gathering, oil processing, oil transfer, oil
distribution, and waste treatment, or in which oil is used, as described in Appendix A to the  SPCC rule. The boundaries of a facility
depend on several site-specific factors, including, but not limited to, the ownership or operation of buildings, structures, and equipment on
the same site and the types of activity at the site.

Permanently closed: Any container or facility for which: (1) All liquid and sludge has been removed from each container and connecting
line; and (2) All connecting lines and piping have been disconnected from the container and blanked off, all valves (except for ventilation
valves) have been closed and locked, and conspicuous signs have been posted on each container stating that it is a permanently closed
container and noting the date of closure.

Storage capacity: Shell capacity of the container.
US. Environmental Protection Agency
         2-26
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
                                                                                Chapter 2: Applicability
Figure 2-2. Applicability assessment worksheet.
  1   Is the facility or part of the facility considered non-transportation-related and engaged in one
     Of the following activities? (Refer to Sections 2.2,4 and 2.3 of this chapter.)
       Drilling, producing, gathering, storing, processing, refining, transferring, distributing,
       using, or consuming oil.

       Yes.  Go to question 2.
       No.   The facility is not subject to the SPCC rule.


  2  Could the facility reasonably be expected to discharge oil in quantities that may be harmful
     into navigable waters or adjoining shorelines? (Refer to Section 2.4 of this chapter.)

     Note: This determination must be based solely upon consideration of the geographical and location
     aspects of the facility (such as proximity to navigable waters or adjoining shorelines, land contour,
     drainage, etc.) and must exclude consideration of manmade features such as  dikes, equipment or other
     structures, which may serve to restrain, hinder, contain, or otherwise prevent a discharge.
       Yes.  Go to question 3.
       No.   The facility is not subject to the SPCC rule.


 3a  is the total aggregate capacity of aboveground oil storage containers greater than 1,320
     gallons? (Refer to Sections 2.5 and 26 of this chapter.)
     Note:  Exclude containers less than 55 gallons, permanently closed containers, and storage containers
     used exclusively in waste water treatment.
       Yes.  The facility is subject to the SPCC rule.
       No.   Go to question 3b.


 3b  Is the total aggregate capacity of completely buried storage tanks greater than 42,000
     gallons? (Refer to Sections 2.5 and 2.6 of this chapter.)

     Note:  Do not include completely buried tanks subject to all technical requirements of 40 CFR part 280
     or 281, containers less than 55 gallons, permanently closed containers, or storage containers used
     exclusively in wastewater treatment.

       Yes.  The facility is subject to the SPCC rule.
       No.   The facility is not subject to the SPCC rule.
US. Environmental Protection Agency
2-27
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------

-------
                                                      Chapter 3: Environmental Equivalence
                      ENVIRONMENTAL EQUIVALENCE
3.1    Introduction

       The environmental equivalence provision, contained in §112.7(a)(2), allows for deviations
from specific requirements of the SPCC rule, as long as the alternative measures provide
equivalent environmental protection. The environmental equivalence provision is a key mechanism
of the performance-based SPCC rule. This flexibility enables facilities to achieve environmental
protection in a manner that fits their unique circumstances.  It also allows facilities to adopt more
protective industry practices and technologies as they become available.  The preamble to the 2002
SPCC regulation refers to certain industry standards that may be useful and can be considered in
implementing the required spill prevention measures.

       The facility owner or operator is responsible for the selection, documentation in the SPCC
Plan, and implementation in the field of SPCC measures, including any environmentally equivalent
measures.  However, a Professional Engineer (PE), when certifying a  Plan as per §112.3(d), must
verify that these alternative methods are in accordance with good engineering practice, including
consideration of industry standards, and provide environmental protection equivalent to the
measures described in the SPCC rule.

       In the SPCC context, equivalent environmental protection means an equal level of
protection of navigable waters and adjoining shorelines from oil pollution. This can be achieved in
various ways, but a facility may not rely solely on measures that are required by other sections of
the rule (e.g., implementing secondary containment) to provide environmentally equivalent
protection.  While environmental equivalence need  not be a mathematical equivalence, it must
achieve the same desired outcome, though not necessarily through the same mode of operation
(see 67 FR 47095).

       The reason for deviating  from a requirement of the SPCC rule, as well as a detailed
description of how equivalent environmental protection will be achieved, must be stated in the
SPCC Plan, as required in §112.7(a)(2). Possible rationales for a deviation include the owner or
operator's ability to show  that the particular requirement is inappropriate for the facility because of
good engineering practice considerations or other reasons, and that he/she can achieve equivalent
environmental protection  in an alternate manner. Thus, a requirement that may be essential for a
facility storing gasoline may be less appropriate for  a facility storing hot asphalt cement due to
differences in the properties and behavior of the two products, and the facility owner or operator
may be able to implement equivalent environmental protection through an alternate technology (67
FR 47094, 47095).

       As mentioned above and as is the case for other technical elements of the SPCC Plan, the
PE must review the selection and implementation of environmentally equivalent measures and
US. Environmental Protection Agency
3-1
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
certify them as being consistent with good engineering practice (§112.3(d)).  The selection of
alternative measures may be based on various considerations, such as safety, cost, geographical
constraints, the appropriateness of a particular requirement based on site-specific considerations,
or other factors consistent with engineering principles.

       Alternative measures, however, cannot rely solely on measures that are already required by
other parts of the rule because this would allow for approaches that provide a lesser degree of
protection overall. For instance, as EPA noted in a May 2004 letter to the Petroleum Marketers
Association of America (PMAA), the presence of sized secondary containment for bulk storage
containers, which is required under §112.8(c) and other relevant parts of the SPCC rule, does not
provide, by itself, an environmentally equivalent alternative to performing integrity testing of bulk
storage containers.1 Although secondary containment reduces the risk of a discharge from primary
containment (the container or tank) to navigable waters and adjoining shorelines and can increase
the effectiveness of another prevention or control measure, it does not serve the purpose of
integrity testing, which is to identify potential leaks or failure of primary containment before a
discharge occurs.

       EPA has indicated, however, that for certain shop-built containers - drums and small bulk
storage containers, for example - for which internal corrosion  poses minimal risk of failure, which
are inspected at least monthly, and for which all sides are visible, visual inspection alone may
suffice to meet the integrity testing requirements under §112.8(c)(6) or §112.12(c)(6) (67 FR
47120). These are only examples; alternative measures that provide equivalent environmental
protection may also be appropriate for other site-specific circumstances.  See Chapter 7,
Inspection, Evaluation, and Testing, for a discussion of "environmentally equivalent" integrity
testing.

       The remainder of this chapter is organized as follows:

       •     Section  3.2 summarizes substantive SPCC requirements subject to the
             environmental equivalence provision.

             Section  3.3 clarifies certain policy areas and provides examples of deviations based
             on the implementation of environmentally equivalent alternatives.

             Section  3.4 describes the role of the EPA inspector in reviewing deviations based on
             environmental equivalence.
         1 See EPA letter to Daniel Gilligan of PMAA, available in Appendix H of this guidance, or at
  http://www.epa. gov/oilspill/pdfs/PMAAJetterpdf.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency         3-2                      Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
                                                           Chapter 3: Environmental Equivalence
3.2   Substantive Requirements Subject to the Environmentai
       Equivalence Provision

       Section 112.7(a)(2) of the SPCC rule allows deviations for most technical elements of the
rule (§§112.7 through 112.12), with the exception of the secondary containment requirements of
§§112.7(c)and 112.7(h)(1), as well as in relevant paragraphs of §§112.8, 112.9, 112.10, and
112.12.  Chapter 4 of this document discusses these secondary containment requirements in detail.
  §112.7{a>(2)
  Comply with all applicable requirements listed in this part. Your Plan may deviate from the requirements in paragraphs
  (g), (h)(2) and (3), and (i) of this section and the requirements in subparts B and C of this part, except the secondary
  containment requirements in paragraphs (c) and (h)(1) of this section, and §§112.8(c)(2), 112.8{c)(11), 112.9(c)(2),
  112.10(c), 112.12(c}{2), 112.12(c)(11), ... where applicable to a specific facility, if you provide equivalent
  environmental protection by some other means of spill prevention, control, or countermeasure  Where your
  Plan does not conform to the applicable requirements in paragraphs (g), (h)(2) and (3), and (i) of this section, or the
  requirements of subparts B and C of this part, except the secondary containment requirements in paragraphs (c) and
  (h)(1) of this section, and §§112.8(c)(2), 112.8(c)(11), 112.9(c){2), 112.10(c), 112.12(c)(2), 112.12(c)(11),... you must
  state the reasons for nonconformance in your Plan and describe in detail alternate methods and how you will
  achieve equivalent environmental protection. If the Regional Administrator determines that the measures described
  in your Plan do not provide equivalent environmental  protection, he may require that you amend your Plan, following
  the procedures in §112.4(d) and (e).

  Note: The above text is an excerpt of the SPCC rule. Emphasis added. Refer to 40 CFR part 112 for the full text of the rule.
       In addition to secondary containment requirements, deviations are not allowed for certain
provisions of §112.7, including the general recordkeeping and training provisions. Additionally,
deviations are not allowed for the administrative provisions of the rule, §§112.1 through 112.5. The
SPCC rule already provides flexibility for the format of records that need to be maintained at the
facility by allowing the use of ordinary and customary business records. Personnel training
(§112.7(f)) and a discussion of conformance with any applicable, more stringent state rules
(§112.7(j» are essential for all facilities.

       Table  3-1 presents a list of the SPCC requirements eligible for consideration for
environmental equivalence.
US. Environmental Protection Agency
3-3
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
Table 3-1. Requirements eligible for environmental equivalence, by facility type.
Section(s)
Facility Type/Provision
All regulated facilities
Security
Loading and unloading racks
Brittle fracture evaluation
Petroleum Oils and
Non-Petroleum Oils
Animal Fats and
Vegetable Oils
112.7(g)
112.7(h)(2)and112.7(h)(3)
Onshore facilities
Facility drainage/undiked areas
Type of bulk storage container
Drainage of diked areas
Corrosion protection of buried storage tanks
Integrity testing and/or container inspection
Monitoring internal heating coils
Engineering of bulk container installation
(overfill prevention)
Monitoring treatment/disposal facilities
Removal of oil in diked areas and
production facility drainage
Piping
Oil drilling and workover facilities
and 112.11(b)
112.8(c)(1)and 112.9(c)(1)
112.8(c)(3)
112.8{c)(4)and112.8(c)(5)
112.8(c)(6)and112.9(c)(3)
112.8(cK7)
112.8(c)(8)and 112.9(c){4)
112.8(c)(9)and112.9(d)(2)
112.8(d), 112.9(d)(1), and
112.9(d)(3)
Facility drainage/undiked areas (rig position) 1 12.10(b)
Blowout prevention and well control system
Offshore facilities
Offshore oil drilling and workover facilities
112.11(b)throuah112.11(p)
112.12(b)
1 1 0 10/pW^^
I \4,. \£-\\*}\'3}
112.12(c)(4)and
112.12(c)(6)
112.12(0(7)
112.12(d)
N/A
N/A
N/A
3.3   Policy Issues Addressed by Environmental Equivalence

      This section provides additional guidance on environmentally equivalent measures for
specific requirements on which the regulated community has raised questions. The examples
discussed below are meant to clarify selected rule provisions and to illustrate how deviations based
on environmentally equivalent alternatives may be implemented.  Other circumstances not
discussed here may also be addressed through the use of environmentally equivalent measures.
The examples in this section address environmental equivalence as it relates to:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
3-4
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
                                                            Chapter 3: Environmental Equivalence
       Section 3.3.1      Security
       Section 3.3.2      Facility Drainage
       Section 3.3.3      Corrosion Protection and Leak Testing of Completely Buried Metallic
                          Storage Tanks
       Section 3.3.4      Overfill Prevention
       Section 3.3.5      Piping
       Section 3.3.6      Evaluation, Inspection, and Testing

       Although briefly discussed in Section 3.3.6, deviations from  inspection and testing
requirements based on environmental equivalence are discussed in greater detail in Chapter 7 of
this guidance document.

3.3.1   Security

       Section 112.7(g) of the SPCC rule outlines security requirements for facilities, including
fencing and lighting, and the use of control  equipment and procedures. The security requirements
are meant to prevent discharges of oil, as defined in §112.1 (b), that could result from acts of
vandalism or other unauthorized access to  oil-filled containers or equipment.  Note that unlike other
provisions under §112.7, the security provisions in paragraph (g) do not apply to oil production
facilities.
       A facility owner or operator may
achieve the security objective through
alternative measures, as appropriate for
the facility, if these measures provide
environmental protection equivalent to the
measures described in the SPCC rule.

       As described in §112.7(a)(2), if
alternative security measures are used,
the Plan must state the reasons for
nonconformance, and provide a
description of the alternative measures,
how they are implemented, and how they
will achieve environmentally equivalent
protection to prevent a discharge as
described in §112.1(b).  This description
may include a discussion of how these
measures help  deter vandals, prevent
unauthorized access to containers and
equipment that could be involved in  an oil
discharge, or are otherwise equivalent to
the SPCC security requirements.
§112.7(g)
Security (excluding oil production facilities).
(1) Fully fence each facility handling, processing, or storing
oil, and lock and/or guard entrance gates when the facility is
not in production or is unattended.
(2) Ensure that the master flow and drain valves and any
other valves permitting direct outward flow of the container's
contents to the surface have adequate security measures so
that they remain in the closed position when in non-operating
or non-standby status.
(3) Lock the starter control on each oil pump in the "off
position and locate it at a site accessible only to authorized
personnel when the pump is in a non-operating or non-
standby status.
(4) Securely cap or blank-flange the loading/unloading
connections of oil pipelines or facility piping when not in
service or when in standby service for an extended time. This
security practice also applies to piping that is emptied of
liquid content either by draining or by inert gas pressure.
(5) Provide facility lighting commensurate with the type and
location of the facility that will assist in the:
(i) Discovery of discharges occurring during hours of
darkness, both by operating personnel, if present, and by
non-operating personnel (the general public, local police,
etc.); and
(ii) Prevention of discharge occurring through acts of
vandalism.

Note: The above text is an excerpt of the SPCC rule. Refer to 40
CFR part 112 for the full text of the rule.
US. Environmental Protection Agency
 3-5
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors

       Fencing. Section 1 12.7(g)(1) requires that owners or operators fully fence the facility and/or
guard gates when the facility is not in production or attended. Two examples of scenarios
discussed in a letter to PMAA2 regarding environmentally equivalent alternatives to fencing the
entire footprint of a facility are discussed below.

       Case #1 - Fencing areas directly
Involved in oil handling, processing, and
storage. [Demonstrates environmental
equivalence.] For certain facilities where oil-filled
containers and equipment are  located within
discrete areas, securing only those parts of the
facilities that could be involved in an oil discharge
may provide an effective level of protection. This
alternative may be preferable for very large
facilities where fencing the entire footprint of the
facility would require installing  and monitoring very
long lengths of fencing. In such cases, installing a
fence around the discrete areas of a facility where oil containers are located (Figure 3-1), or around
the equipment needed to operate  such  containers (Figure 3-2), may adequately deter vandals or
prevent access by unauthorized personnel, and thus may provide environmental protection
equivalent to the §1 12.7(g)(1) requirement to fully fence the facility to prevent a discharge as
described in §112.1(b) from these containers. Note that in the second case (i.e., where a fence is
placed only around the equipment used to operate containers), security measures may also be
required around the containers themselves, or other equipment and appurtenances connected to
the containers.

       Case #2 - Placing master disconnect
panel controlling power to all pumps,
appurtenances (which could result in a
discharge such as from a bottom water drain),
and containers within an enclosed "pump
house." [Does not demonstrate environmental
equivalence.] Certain facilities may equip an
enclosed pump house with a master disconnect
switch that cuts off electrical power to the pumps
when the facility is unattended. Such disconnect
may provide equivalent protection for the pumps
and associated equipment that require  power to    Rgure 3.2 Fendng around  a dispenser pump
operate and would meet the §1 12.7(g)(3)
requirement to lock starter controls on oil pumps in the "off position and restrict access to
        2 Available on EPA's Web site at http:/,\WAV.epa.gpvjOiispill/pdfs/PIV!M ietter.pdf or in Appendix
  H of this guidance.
L/.S. Environmental Protection Agency
3-6
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
                                                        Chapter 3: Environmental Equivalence
authorized personnel only. However, if containers, piping, or appurtenances are also present, the
disconnect would not restrict access to equipment that can be operated without electrical power.
Therefore, it would not provide environmental protection equivalent to fencing. Additional security
measures would therefore be required for equipment that can be operated without electrical power.

       Lighting. Section 112.7(g)(5) states that facilities must provide lighting to assist in the
discovery of discharges occurring during hours of darkness and help prevent discharges caused by
acts of vandalism.  Note that the rule requires lighting that is "commensurate with the type and
location of the facility." Thus, for unattended facilities that are located away from inhabited areas
(for example, farm fields or certain isolated facilities) appropriate lighting may consist of lights that
are turned on Intermittently.  For example, lighting that uses motion-activated detectors may be an
appropriate means of meeting the lighting requirements, while avoiding undue attention to the
presence of oil containers. Alternatively, an environmentally equivalent approach may combine an
alarm system that detects the presence of trespassers, with portable lights used to perform regular
rounds of the facility. Whatever approach the owner or operator implements, the SPCC Plan
should discuss how lighting provided at the facility is adequate for the type and location of the
facility, or how the facility is achieving environmentally equivalent protection through other means.

       The security requirements may also be met through other means, depending on facility-
specific circumstances. For example, a facility that is attended by a security guard on a 24-hour
basis may use closed-circuit  cameras to detect and investigate unauthorized access to unfenced
portions of the facility. In another example, a facility such as  an electrical substation that is
remotely located with limited  access and monitored through use of a Supervisory Control and Data
Acquisition (SCADA) system, may provide environmentally equivalent security by its configuration
since the site's inaccessibility may be considered a powerful deterrent to unauthorized access and
the SCADA system serves to detect oil discharges remotely without requiring lighting to assist
visual detection.

3.3.2  Facility Drainage

       Section  112.8(b) describes facility drainage provisions for onshore facilities that handle
petroleum oils and non-petroleum oils other than animal fats and/or vegetable oils.  Section
112.12(b) provides the corresponding requirements for facilities that handle animal fats and/or
vegetable oils.  The description of the design capacity of facility drainage systems is also addressed
under §§112.7(a)(3) and 112.7(b).

       Diked Storage Area  Provisions

       The objective of the drainage requirements is to provide design specifications for the
secondary containment systems employed at the facility to prevent oil-contaminated water from
escaping the facility and becoming a discharge as described  in §112.1 (b).
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
3-7
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
       Sections 112.8(b)(1) and 112.8(b)(2)
specify requirements for the design of drainage
systems for dikes used as a means of
secondary containment.  (See Chapter 4 for a
more detailed discussion of secondary
containment requirements.)

       Under §112.8(b)(1) and 112.8(b)(2), the
SPCC regulation requires that when the facility
owner/operator uses valves to drain a dike or
berm, the valves must be of manual,
open-and-closed design, unless the facility
drainage system is equipped to control oil
discharges.  The facility owner or operator, and
the PE certifying a Plan, may consider
alternative technologies specifically engineered
to prevent oil from escaping the facility
containment and drainage control system,
while normally allowing drainage of
uncontaminated water.  When implemented
and maintained properly, such systems may
provide environmental protection equivalent to
using a manually operated valve and visually
monitoring discharge from dikes.  Certain
valves will automatically shut off upon detecting
oil. These types of systems have been
installed at electrical substations, for example,
to drain uncontaminated rainwater under
normal conditions, while also preventing oil
from escaping the containment system in the
event of a discharge from transformers or other
oil-filled electrical equipment.  The material
expands upon contact with oil, effectively plugging the drainage system.  The valve is not actuated,
but rather the drainage system becomes plugged upon contact with the oil, thus providing an
equivalent measure of environmental protection.

To be most effective, however, EPA recommends that the systems have a fail-safe design to
automatically prevent any oil from escaping the containment area in the event of a system
malfunction.  The PE certifying the Plan should verify the adequacy of the system to prevent oil
discharges to navigable waters and adjoining  shorelines, considering factors such as the type of oif
and its compatibility with the system selected, the amount of precipitation, maintenance
requirements, flow paths, and proximity to navigable waters. The SPCC Plan should also describe
   §§112.8(b) and 112.12(b) Facility Drainage,
   (1) Restrain drainage from diked storage areas by
   valves to prevent a discharge into the drainage system
   or facility effluent treatment system, except where
   facility systems are designed to control such discharge.
   You may empty diked areas by pumps or ejectors;
   however, you must manually activate these pumps or
   ejectors and must inspect the condition of the
   accumulation before starting, to ensure no oil will be
   discharged.
   (2) Use valves of manual, open-and-closed design, for
   the drainage of diked areas. You may not use flapper-
   type drain valves to drain diked areas. If your facility
   drainage drains directly into  a watercourse and not into
   an on-srte waste water treatment plant, you must
   inspect and may drain uncontaminated retained
   storm water, as provided in paragraphs (c)(3)(ii), (iii),
   and (iv) of this section
   (3) Design facility drainage systems from undiked
   areas with a potential for a discharge (such as where
   piping  is located outside containment walls or where
   tank truck discharges may occur outside the loading
   area) to flow into ponds, lagoons, or catchment basins
   designed to retain oil or return it to the facility. You
   must not locate catchment basins in areas subject to
   periodic flooding.
   (4) If facility drainage is not engineered as in paragraph
   (b)(3) of this section, equip the final discharge of all
   ditches inside the facility with a diversion system that
   would, in the event of an uncontrolled discharge, retain
   oil in the facility.
   (5) Where drainage waters are treated in more than
   one treatment unit and such treatment is continuous,
   and pump transfer is needed, provide two "lift" pumps
   and permanently install at least one of the pumps.
   Whatever techniques you use, you must engineer
   facility drainage systems to prevent a discharge as
   described in §112.1(b) in case there is an equipment
   failure  or human error at the facility.

   Note: The above text is an excerpt of the SPCC rule.
   Emphasis added. Refer to 40 CFR part 112 for the full text of
   the rule.
US. Environmental Protection Agency
3-8
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
                                                        Chapter 3: Environmental Equivalence
procedures for maintaining these systems and checking their effectiveness by routine inspections
and inspections following heavy rain events to ensure that they are operational.

       Undiked Storage Area Provisions

       Sections 112.8(b)(3) and 112.8(b)(4) specify performance requirements for systems used to
drain undiked areas with the potential for a discharge.  These two provisions apply only when the
facility chooses to use a facility drainage system to meet general secondary containment
requirements under §112.7(c) or a more specific requirement under§112.8(c), §112.9(c),
§112.10(c) or §112.12(c). Where the facility drainage cannot be engineered as described in
§112.8(b)(3), the SPCC rule requires that the facility equip the final discharge points of all ditches
within the facility with a diversion system that would, in the event of a discharge, retain the oil at the
facility as described in §112.8(b){4).  Additional requirements in §112.8(b)(5) pertain more
specifically to engineering multiple treatment units for these drainage systems.

       For parts of a facility that could be involved in a discharge and where secondary
containment requirements are met through the use of a drainage system rather than a dike or berm,
the SPCC rule generally requires facility drainage to flow into a system, such as a pond, lagoon, or
catchment basin, designed to retain the oil or return it to the facility.  Other measures may be
implemented to achieve the drainage control objective, based on good engineering practice and
subject to PE review and certification. For example, directing undiked facility drainage into an
impoundment system located within a neighboring facility may be considered equivalent to keeping
it within the facility's confines (as required in §112.8(b)(4)) if the neighboring facility owner has
agreed to allow use of the impoundment and as long as the impoundment is designed and
managed such that  it is capable of handling a potential discharge from both facilities before it
becomes a discharge as described in §112.1(b).

       Alternatively, a facility owner or operator may engineer the facility drainage system intended
to meet general secondary containment requirements of §112.7(c) to flow into an oil/water
separator designed  to remove oil resulting from facility operations. Chapter 5 of this guidance
document describes the requirements, depending on their function, that apply to oil/water
separators at SPCC-regulated facilities. The SPCC Plan should discuss how the oil/water
separator provides environmental equivalence, and any procedures necessary to maintain proper
operating conditions and the effectiveness of the system (such as maintenance of the filtration
systems). Note that the oil/water separator should be designed to handle the anticipated flow rate
and volumes of oil and water.  Furthermore, the oil/water separator should be inspected or checked
periodically (including after heavy rain events) to ensure  that it is working effectively and that it is
not holding significant quantities of oil for extended periods of time.  For the oil/water separator to
provide equivalent environmental protection under §112.8(b)(3) and (b)(4), the PE must verify that
the oil/water separator is adequately designed and operated to effectively retain any discharge as
described in §112.1(b).
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
3-9
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
       Drainage at Production Facilities

       Similar deviations from SPCC drainage
control requirements are possible for other types of
facilities.  Section 112.9(b), for example, outlines
drainage requirements for production facilities. They
include sealing dike drains or drains of equivalent
measures required under §1 12.7(c)(1) for tank
batteries and separation and treating areas at all
times except when draining uncontaminated
rainwater. The PE may specify alternative
measures, such as the technologies described
above for electrical substations, that would provide
equivalent environmental protection by retaining oil
within the diked area in the event of a discharge.
(See the above discussion in Section 3.3.2, Diked
Storage Area Provisions.) Here also, the  Plan must
describe the measure in detail and how it  provides
environmentally equivalent protection when implemented in the field, as required by §112.7(a)(2).

       Wherever a facility owner or operator chooses to deviate from the drainage control
provisions by using an alternative measure that provides equivalent environmental protection, the
SPCC Plan must state the reasons for nonconformance and describe the alternative measure in
detail,  including how it achieves equivalent environmental protection when implemented
         §112.9(b)
         Oil production facility drainage.
         (1) At tank batteries and separation and treating
         areas where there is a reasonable possibility of a
         discharge as described in §112.1(b), close and
         seal at all times drains of dikes or drains of
         equivalent measures required under
         §112.7(c)(1). except when draining
         uncontaminated rainwater.  Prior to drainage,
         you must inspect the diked area and take action
         as provided in §112.8(c)(3)(ii), (iii), and (iv). You
         must remove accumulated oil on the rainwater
         and return it to storage or dispose of it in
         accordance with legally approved methods.
         (2) Inspect at regularly scheduled intervals field
         drainage systems (such as drainage ditches or
         road ditches), and oil traps, sumps, or skimmers,
         for an accumulation of oil that may have resulted
         from any small discharge. You must promptly
         remove any accumulations of oil.

         Note: The above text is an excerpt of the SPCC rule.
         Refer to 40 CFR part 112 for the full text of the rule.
3.3.3  Corrosion Protection and Leak Testing of Completely Buried Metallic Storage Tanks
       Section 112.8(c) describes requirements
that apply to bulk storage containers at facilities
that store, use, or process petroleum and other
non-petroleum oils.  Similar provisions are included
in §112.12(c) for facilities that store,  use, or
process animal fats and/or vegetable oils. The
various subparagraphs under these sections
address requirements that apply to different types
of bulk storage containers, appurtenances, and
related activities.
       §§112.8(c)(4) and 112.12(c)(4)
       Protect any completely buried metallic storage tank
       installed on or after January 10, 1974 from
       corrosion by coatings or cathodic protection
       compatible with local soil conditions. You must
       regularly leak test such completely buried metallic
       storage tanks.

       Note: The above text is an excerpt of the SPCC rule.
       Refer to 40 C FR part 112 for the full text of the rule.
       Subparagraph (c)(4) requires that facility owners or operators protect buried metallic storage
tanks from corrosion and regularly perform leak test on the tanks.  Completely buried storage tanks
are exempted from SPCC requirements, as provided in §112.1(d)(2)(i), when the tanks are subject
US. Environmental Protection Agency
3-10
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
                                                          Chapter 3: Environmental Equivalence
to all of the technical requirements of 40 CFR part 280 or a state program approved under 40 CFR
part 281.  Tanks subject to 40 CFR part 280 or a state program approved under 40 CFR part 281
must follow those requirements.  Completely buried tanks that are subject to SPCC requirements
must meet the provisions outlined in §112.8(c)(4) or§112.12(c)(4).

       Completely buried tanks subject to the  SPCC rule include, but are not limited to, tanks with
capacity of 110 gallons or less, heating oil tanks, and tanks located inside basements or tunnels.
Corrosion protection and leak detection for completely buried tanks that meet the corresponding
(corrosion protection and leak detection) testing requirements of 40 CFR part 280 or 40 CFR part
281 are considered environmentally equivalent to §§112.8{c)(4) and 112.12(c)(4).  See Chapter 2
for more information on the applicability of the  SPCC rule to completely buried storage tanks.

3.3.4  Overfill Prevention
       Sections 112.8(c)(8) and 112.12(c)(8)
require that each container installation be
engineered to avoid discharges during filling
activities. At least one of the following systems is
required:

              High level alarm with audible or
              visual signal;
              High liquid level pump cutoff
              device;
       •      Direct audible or code signal
              communication between container
              gauger and pumping station;
              Fast response system for
              determining the liquid level, such
              as digital computer, telepulse, or
              direct vision gauge, provided that
              someone is present to monitor
              gauges and the overall filling
              operation; and
              Regular tests of liquid level sensing
      §§112.8(c)(8) and 112.12(c)(8)
      Engineer or update each container installation in
      accordance with good engineering practice to avoid
      discharges. You must provide at least one of the
      following devices:
      (i) High liquid level alarms with an audible or visual
      signal at a constantly attended operation or
      surveillance station. In smaller facilities an audible
      air vent may suffice.
      (ii) High liquid level pump cutoff devices set to stop
      flow at a predetermined container content level.
      (iii) Direct audible or code signal communication
      between the container gauger and the pumping
      station.
      (iv) A fast response system for determining the
      liquid level of each bulk storage container such as
      digital computers, telepulse, or direct vision gauges.
      If you use this alternative, a person must be present
      to monitor gauges and the overall filling of bulk
      storage containers.
      (v) You must regularly test liquid level sensing
      devices to ensure proper operation.

      NOTD The aba»« text is an excerpt 
-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
ability of the person performing the filling operation to continuously monitor product level in the
container; reaction time; capacity of the secondary containment and/or catchment basin; and
proximity of the tank to floor drains, sumps, and other means through which oil could escape.  For
example, a filling procedure for a small container may involve placing a drain cover on any floor
drain, ensuring that valves used to control drainage from the secondary containment are closed or
that sorbent material has been deployed around the container area, verifying that the container that
will receive the product has sufficient free capacity, and visually monitoring the product level
throughout the transfer operation.

       In cases where a facility owner or operator uses an overfill prevention approach other than
the systems described in the SPCC rule, the Plan must describe the approach and how it provides
environmentally equivalent protection (§112.7(a)(2)). Where the alternative approach relies on
procedures instead of, or in addition to,  a physical device, the Plan should clearly describe the
procedures and facility personnel involved in filling operations should be able to demonstrate an
understanding of the procedures and proper field implementation.  As pan" of the description of the
environmentally equivalent measure required under §112.7(a)(2), the PE may reference other
facility documents in the SPCC Plan which discuss relevant established Best Management
Practices (BMPs), pollution prevention training and/or procedures in more detail, rather than
restating this information in the SPCC Plan.
Additional supporting documentation should
be on-site and available for review during an
inspection.
3.3,5  Piping

       Requirements that apply to piping at
onshore facilities that handle petroleum oils
are described in §112.8(d).  Similar
requirements are described in §112.12(d) for
piping at facilities that handle animal fats
and/or vegetable oils.

       These provisions of the SPCC rule
require that facilities generally protect buried
piping against corrosion; cap or blank-flange
the terminal connection of piping that is not in
service;  design  pipe supports to minimize
abrasion and corrosion; and regularly inspect
all aboveground valves, piping, and
appurtenances. The rule also requires
integrity and leak testing of all piping at the
time of installation, modification, construction,
relocation, or replacement.  Finally, the rule
   §§112.8(d)and112.12(d)
   Facility-transfer operations, pumping, and facility
   process.
   (1) Provide buried piping that is installed or replaced on
   or after August 16, 2002, with a protective wrapping and
   coating. You must also cathodically protect such buried
   piping installations or otherwise satisfy the corrosion
   protection standards for piping in part 280 of this chapter
   or a State program approved under part 281 of this
   chapter. If a section of buried line is exposed for any
   reason, you must carefully inspect it for deterioration.  If
   you find corrosion damage, you must undertake
   additional examination and corrective action as indicated
   by the magnitude of the damage.
   (2) Cap or blank-flange the terminal connection at the
   transfer point and mark it as to origin when piping is not
   in service or is in standby service for an extended time.
   (3) Properly design pipe support to minimize abrasion
   and corrosion and allow for expansion and contraction.
   (4) Regularly inspect all aboveground valves, piping, and
   appurtenances. During the inspection you must assess
   the general condition of items, such as flange joints,
   expansion joints, valve glands and bodies,  catch pans,
   pipeline supports, locking of valves, and metal surfaces.
   You must also conduct integrity and leak testing of
   buried piping at the time of installation, modification,
   construction, relocation, or replacement
   (5) Warn all vehicles entering the facility to be sure that
   no vehicle will endanger aboveground piping or other oil
   transfer operations.

   NOTE: The above text is an excerpt of the SPCC rule. Refer to
   40 C FR part 112 for the full text of the rule.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
3-12
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
                                                        Chapter 3: Environmental Equivalence
requires warning all vehicles entering the facility to ensure that they will not endanger aboveground
piping (or other oil transfer operations). Types of facility piping addressed by this provision include,
but are not limited to:

              Transfer piping to and from bulk storage containers, both aboveground and buried;
              Transfer piping associated with manufacturing equipment,  both aboveground and
              buried; and
              Piping associated with operational equipment.

       An EPA study into the causes of oil releases indicates that the operational piping portion of
an underground storage tank system is twice as likely as the tank portion  to be the source of a
discharge.3 Piping failures are caused equally by poor workmanship, improper installation,
corrosion, or other forms of deterioration. The SPCC piping requirements aim to prevent oil
discharges from aboveground or buried piping due to corrosion, operational accidents, or collision.
Accordingly, equivalent environmental protection may be achieved through alternative measures
that reduce or eliminate the risks of corrosion to buried piping or the risk of damage to aboveground
piping.

       The following sections discuss examples of deviations from prevention requirements related
to corrosion and other types of piping damage.

       Protecting Buried Piping from Corrosion Damage

       EPA recommends that a PE certifying an SPCC Plan consult appropriate industry standards
(consulting a qualified corrosion professional may also be appropriate) when evaluating the
adequacy of cathodic protection and corrosion prevention systems at the  facility. Where the PE
determines that cathodic protection of new piping is  not appropriate considering site-specific
conditions, facility configuration, and other engineering factors (e.g., where the installation of a
corrosion system would accelerate corrosion of existing unprotected equipment), the PE may
specify other measures to assess and ensure the continued fitness-for-service of piping.

       For example, the owner or operator of a facility could, instead of cathodically protecting
underground piping, use double-wall piping combined with an interstitial leak detection system (67
FR 47123). The SPCC requirement (cathodic protection) averts discharges by preventing container
corrosion, while the alternative method (leak detection system and double-wall piping) detects and
contains leakage so it may be addressed before it can become a discharge as described in
       Alternatively, the facility owner or operator may implement a comprehensive monitoring,
detection, and preventive maintenance program for piping and appurtenances where effective
cathodic protection is not reasonably achievable to detect and address potential discharges.  The
        3 "Causes of Release from Underground Storage Tank Systems: Attachments," September 1987,
  EPA510-R-92-702.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency        3-13                      Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
PE that certifies the Plan should develop and/or review such a program, which may combine
inspection, monitoring and leak testing elements with preventive maintenance, contingency
measures, and recordkeeping. Examples of these elements are outlined for piping systems in API
Standard 570, "Piping Inspection Code: Inspection, Repair, Alteration, and Rerating of In-Service
Piping Systems,"

       Table 3-2 summarizes key elements of an API-570 inspection program as they relate to the
evaluation of buried piping that is not cathodically protected (refer to Chapter 7 of this document for
an overview of API-570).  Such a program provides a means of assessing the suitability of piping to
contain oil and to predict potential failures prior to their occurrence.

Table 3-2. Summary of inspection and leak testing elements of an API-570 program as they apply
to unprotected buried piping (refer to the full text of API 570 for details).
  Inspection and Leak Testing
          Elements
 Pipe-to-Soil Potential Survey
                           Summary
Conduct pipe-to-soil potential survey along the pipe route to assess
corrosion potential at a five-year interval.  Excavate sites where active
corrosion cells are located to determine the extent of corrosion damage.
 Pipe Coating Holiday* Survey
Conduct pipe coating holiday survey as needed based on results of other
evaluations.
 Soil Corrosivity

 External and Internal
 Inspection Intervals
Perform soil corrosivity evaluation at a five-year interval for piping buried
in lengths greater than 100 feet.
Determine external condition of buried piping that is not cathodically
protected by pigging or by excavating according to frequency indicated in
API-570 standard table. Adjust inspection of internal corrosion of buried
piping based on results of internal inspections of aboveground portion.
 Leak Testing Intervals
Alternatively, or in addition to inspection, perform leak testing with
pressure at least 10 percent greater than maximum operating pressure at
an interval half that of inspections indicated in the standard for buried
piping that is not cathodically protected. Alternatively, perform
temperature-corrected volumetric or pressure test methods, or use
acoustic emission examination and addition of tracer fluid.	
' "Holiday" means any discontinuity, bare, or thin spot in a painted area.

       Where a piping inspection and testing program is used to provide environmental protection
equivalent to cathodic protection, its scope and frequency should be developed and/or reviewed by
the PE certifying the Plan to be in accordance with good engineering practice, considering industry
standards. For facilities with shorter lengths of piping or where the distance to receiving waters or
adjoining shorelines is greater, the  program may emphasize certain elements over others, such as
frequent leak testing of buried piping.  Chapter 7 provides references to industry standards that
specifically discuss leak testing, including API Recommended Practice 1110, "Pressure Testing of
Liquid Petroleum Pipelines."  However, since leak testing only detects leaks, rather than predicting
them, good engineering practice would suggest that testing should occur at a greater frequency
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
               3-14
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
                                                        Chapter 3: Environmental Equivalence
than would otherwise be required if other prevention systems, such as cathodic protection and
coatings, were in place.

       If alternative measures are used to meet the SPCC corrosion protection requirements,
§112.7(a)(2) requires that the Plan state the reasons for nonconformance and explain how the
alternative measures provide environmental protection equivalent to coating and cathodically
protecting new piping. In order to be considered equivalent environmental protection to cathodic
protection, EPA suggests that a comprehensive inspection and preventive maintenance program
needs to be implemented to effectively detect and address piping deterioration before it can result
in a discharge as described in §112.1(b). The inspector should verify that the alternative  method is
described in detail in the Plan, and that the Plan specifies the scope and frequency of tests and
inspections and/or refers to the relevant industry standards.  The EPA inspector should also  review
records maintained under normal business practice that document the tests and inspections.

       Preventing Physical Damage to Aboveground Piping

       Warnings to vehicles entering the facility may be given verbally, posted on signs, or other
appropriate means.  Alternatively, protecting the equipment from the possibility of a collision  by
installing fencing, barriers, curbing or other physical obstacles may be considered to  provide
equivalent environmental protection. Whatever method is implemented at the facility, it must be
properly documented in the SPCC Plan in accordance with §112.7(a)(2).

3.3.6  Evaluation, Inspection, and Testing

       The SPCC rule sets requirements for the evaluation, inspection, and testing of various parts
of a facility that could be involved in a discharge. The  requirements are described in Chapter 7 of
this guidance document.

       The evaluation, inspection, and testing requirements are aimed at detecting oil leaks, spills,
or other potential integrity problems before they can result in a discharge as described in  §112.1 (b).
The  rule provides flexibility in the manner in which the  evaluations, inspections, and tests are
performed by allowing the  use of methods consistent with good engineering practice, as determined
by the PE certifying the Plan, considering industry standards.

       While the rule describes the general nature and expected scope for evaluations,
inspections, and tests, the requirements are eligible for the environmental equivalence provisions
under §112.7{a)(2), and  a facility owner or operator can therefore implement alternative measures if
he/she states in the Plan the reason for nonconformance and describes in detail the  alternative
measures and how the alternative measures provide environmental protection equivalent to that
provided by the required evaluation, inspection, or test.

       The use of environmental equivalence for evaluation, inspection, and testing requirements is
discussed in Chapter 7 of this guidance document, along with the background information on
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
3-15
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
relevant regulatory requirements, industry standards, and recommended practices, which is
necessary for discussing alternatives to these provisions.

3.4   Review of Environmental Equivalence

       Any substitution of a prevention and control measure required by the rule with an
environmentally equivalent measure must be documented in the SPCC Plan, as required in
§112.7(a)(2). This documentation is reviewed by the EPA inspector during inspections to ensure
that the facility is in compliance with the regulatory requirements.

       The EPA inspector may refer to the list in Table 3-3 at the end of this chapter to identify and
review technical rule requirements that are eligible for deviation through the environmental
equivalence provision.

       Environmentally equivalent measures are not available for the general and specific
secondary containment provisions of the SPCC rule.  Instead, §112.7(d) provides a separate
means of deviating from secondary containment requirements through a determination of
impracticability when secondary containment is not practicable. Environmentally equivalent
deviations are also not available for the general recordkeeping and training provisions in §112.7.
The rule already provides flexibility in the manner of recordkeeping by allowing the  use of ordinary
and customary business records. The rule also does not specify how the training of oil-handling
personnel is conducted, or whom to designate as a person accountable for oil discharge prevention
3.4.1   SPCC Plan Documentation

       For each environmental equivalent measure, the SPCC Plan must state the reason for
nonconformance within the relevant section of the Plan, as required in §1 12.7(a)(2). The Plan must
also describe the alternative measure in detail and explain how the measure provides
environmental protection equivalent to that provided by the SPCC provision.

       The facility owner or operator must ensure that alternative measures are adequate for the
facility; that equipment, devices, or materials are designed for the intended use; and that the
equipment, devices, or materials are properly implemented and maintained to provide effective
environmental protection (§§1 12.3(d) and 1 12.7). EPA emphasizes that the environmental
equivalence provision is not intended to be used as a means to avoid complying with the rule or
simply as an excuse for not meeting requirements the owner or operator believes are too costly.
The alternative measure chosen must represent good engineering practice and must achieve
environmental protection equivalent to the SPCC rule requirement as required in §112.7(a)(2).
Technical deviations, like other substantive technical portions of the Plan requiring the application
of engineering judgement, are subject to PE certification (67 FR 47095).
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
3-16
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
                                                          Chapter 3; Environmental Equivalence
       In cases where operational procedures are used as environmentally equivalent alternatives
to SPCC requirements, the Plan must state the reasons for nonconformance and describe in detail
the alternate methods and how this will achieve equivalent environmental protection (§112.7(a)(2)).
The description should provide the details of how the procedures are implemented at the facility,
including detailing the steps involved in each activity, required equipment, personnel training, and
records that need to be maintained to document  and verify implementation. Records that would be
kept as part of usual and customary business practices are generally considered acceptable forms
of documentation, but should be referenced in the Plan and available for an inspector's review
during an inspection. These records must be maintained with the Plan for a period of three years
(§112.7(e)).  Certain industry standards, for example API Standards 570 and 653, may specify that
records are to be maintained for more than three years.

       The two examples below illustrate documentation of environmentally equivalent measures
that may be provided in a hypothetical SPCC Plan.

Example #1: Documentation of Environmentally Equivalent Protection for Integrity Testing
(§112.8(c)(6))-Tank Elevated off the Ground
Bulk Storage Tanks - 40 CFR 112.8(c)(6)
ABC Oil is deviating from the integrity testing provision of §112.8{c)(6) for storage tank #3; based on good
engineering practice after considering the tank installation and alternative measures, the requirements of Stee)
Tank Institute (STI) Standard SP-001, and alternative measures implemented by the faciiity.  Tank #3 is a
4,500-gallon UL142 aboveground horizontal tank elevated on built-in saddles, and all sides of the tank are
visible. Tank #3 is not insulated, and the outside surface of the tank shell can therefore be observed on an
ongoing basis. The tank is located over a concrete floor, which functions as a release prevention barrier and
has properly sized containment in accordance with §112.8{c)(2). Under SP-001, the tank is considered a
Category 1 tank (aboveground storage tank with spill control and with continuous release detection method)
and therefore requires periodic inspection of the tank. The personnel performing these inspections are
knowledgeable of storage facility operations, characteristics of the liquid stored, the type of aboveground
storage tank and its associated components.  Facility personnel perform  monthly and annual inspections, as
described in Section 3.4 of the Plan and in accordance with the provisions and the checklists presented in SP-
OOL The scope of inspections and procedures is covered in the training  provided to employees involved in
handling oil at the facility. The routine inspections focus specifically on detecting any change in conditions or
signs of product leakage from the tank, piping system, and appurtenances.

In accordance with inspection procedures outlined in this Plan, if signs of leakage or deterioration from  the
tank are observed  by facility personnel, the tank is to be inspected by a tank inspector certified by the
American Petroleum Institute or STI to assess its suitability for continued service, according to SP-001.

Facility personnel who conduct inspections are qualified in accordance with SP-001. The tank's physical
configuration, combined  with monthly and annual inspections, ensures that any small leak that could develop
in the tank shell will be detected before it can become significant, escape secondary containment, and reach
the environment.  This approach provides environmental protection equivalent to the non-destructive shell
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
3-17
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
evaluation component of integrity testing required under §112.8(c)(6) since it provides an appropriate and
effective means of assessing the condition of the tank and its suitability for continued service.
Example #2: Documentation of Environmentally Equivalent Protection for Drainage of Diked
Areas (§112.8(b)(1) and §112.8(b)(2))
Facility Drainage - 40 CFR 112.8(b)(1) and 40 CFR 112.8(b)(2)
The dike structure in Area A contains three oil-filled transformers (see list of equipment and oil storage
capacity in the Plan),  The dike is equipped with a [TRADEMARK] drain shutoff system specifically engineered
to prevent oil from escaping the containment structure while allowing water to flow through during normal
conditions.  The system uses hydrophobia and oleofilic material to block the flow of water upon reacting to the
presence of oil.  Documentation of the performance of this system and the manufacturer's suggested
replacement interval are maintained as an appendix to this Plan.

Employee supervision is not required under regular operating conditions to drain uncontaminated rainwater
that has accumulated in the dike. This method deviates from the rule requirements, which generally require
that a dike be drained under direct visual supervision using valves of manual, open-and-closed design.

The diked area is inspected monthly by facility personnel as part of the scheduled inspection of bulk storage
tanks, as per the checklist presented in Appendix A. This inspection includes looking for accumulation of
water and presence of oil within the diked area, and examining, and replacing, as warranted, the silt filter and
[TRADEMARK} elements. Facility personnel also examine the system, and replace components as needed,
within 48  hours of any rainfall greater than 3 inches. Replacement of the  silt filter and/or other elements of the
[TRADEMARK] system are noted on the monthly inspection sheets, which are maintained at the facility for
three years. All maintenance is performed following the manufacturer's specifications.  Maintenance
requirements are covered in the employee training program.

In the event that the filter clogs and storm water accumulates within the diked area, facility personnel will
follow required procedures for dike drainage as follows:

       1}      Inspect the retained rainwater to ensure that it does not contain oil (it will not cause a
               discharge to [Insert Name of Waterbody] or adjoining shorelines which is the nearest
               navigable water to the facility).
       2)      Open the bypass valve, allow drainage, and reseal the valve.
       3)      Record event in log.
       The above examples provide a sufficient level of detail to allow the EPA inspector to
understand what the facility is doing to meet the objectives of the SPCC rule with regard to the

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency          3-18                       Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
                                                       Chapter 3: Environmental Equivalence
given provision, and to verify implementation of the measure(s) in the field. A Plan that simply
notes the use of an alternative measure without supporting descriptions would not be considered
sufficient.  An example of insufficient documentation is given below.

Example #3: Insufficient Documentation of Environmentally Equivalent Protection for
Integrity Testing (§112.8(c)(6))
Bulk Storage Tanks- 40 CFR 112.8(c)(6)
No integrity testing is needed on tank 3A as this is an elevated shop-built storage tank and all sides are visible.
The outside of the tank is to be inspected on a regular schedule.
       In contrast to the two previous examples, Example #3 does not provide sufficient detail to
ascertain whether the approach provides environmentally equivalent protection.  In particular, it
does not describe how environmental equivalence is achieved, who performs the inspection, what
is inspected, and at what frequency.

3.4.2   Role of the EPA Inspector

       Like other technical aspects of the SPCC Plan, the selection and implementation of
environmentally equivalent measures must be reviewed by the certifying PE for consistency with
good engineering practice (§112.3{d}).  For each case where an environmentally equivalent
measure is used, the EPA inspector should verify that the Plan includes:

       The reasons for nonconformance;
       A detailed description of the alternative measure; and
«      An explanation describing how the alternative measure provides protection that is
       environmentally equivalent.

Additionally,  the inspector should verify implementation of the alternative measure in the field.

       The explanation describing how an alternative measure achieves environmental
equivalence  does not need to demonstrate "mathematical equivalency," but the alternative measure
does need to provide equivalent protection of the environment against a discharge as described in
§112.1(b). The Plan should describe how the alternative measure prevents, controls, or mitigates a
discharge, as well as the procedures or equipment used to implement the alternative measure and
ensure its continued effectiveness, particularly in terms of the measure's practical impacts on field
operations, employee training, monitoring, and equipment maintenance.

       By certifying an SPCC Plan, a PE attests that the Plan has been prepared in accordance
with good engineering practice, that it meets  the requirements of 40 CFR part 112, and that it is
adequate for the facility. EPA encourages innovative techniques for preventing discharges, but
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
3-19
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
these techniques need to effectively protect the environment. EPA believes that, in general, PEs
will seek to protect themselves from liability by certifying only measures that do provide equivalent
environmental protection (67 FR 47095). If alternative measures are certified by a PE as being
environmentally equivalent, are properly documented, and are appropriately implemented in the
field, they should generally be considered acceptable by EPA regional inspectors.

       The inspector should note whether the alternative measures meet the standards of common
sense, and appear to agree with recognized industry standards or, where such standards are not
used, are in accordance with good engineering practice. The inspector should assess
implementation of the alternative measures, including whether they appear to have been altered or
differ from the measures described in the Plan and certified by the PE, have not been implemented
correctly, require maintenance that has not occurred, appear to be inadequate for the facility, or
otherwise do not meet the overall oil spill prevention objective of the SPCC rule.

       If the inspector questions the appropriateness of alternative measures, he/she should fully
document all observations and other pertinent information for further review by the regional staff.
Follow-up action by the EPA inspector may include requesting additional information from the
facility owner or operator on the implementation of the equivalent measure.  The EPA Regional
Administrator retains the authority to require amendment for deviations, as he/she can for any other
part of a Plan. If the Regional Administrator determines that the measures described in the SPCC
Plan do not provide equivalent environmental protection, then the procedures for requiring a Plan
amendment under §112.4(d) and (e) and/or an enforcement action may be initiated as deemed
appropriate.

       Table  3-3 lists the SPCC provisions that may be met through environmentally equivalent
measures, and provides guidance on the kinds  of questions an inspector should consider when
reviewing environmentally equivalent measures in an SPCC Plan and during a site inspection.  The
table provides a list of evaluation questions for each section of the rule, means of verifying
compliance during an on-site review, and elements that should  be considered in cases where the
facility installation does not conform with the methods described in the SPCC rule.  The EPA
inspector should use the part(s) of the table that are relevant to the facility being inspected.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency         3-20                     Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
                                                                                      Chapter 3: Environmental Equivalence
Table 3-3.  SPCC requirements for environmentally equivalent measures under §112.7(a)(2).
  Rule Element
 Relevant
Section (s)
Evaluation
  Verification
During Site Visit
Baili for Environmental Equivalence
  ALL FACILITIES

  Security           112.7(g)(1)
                    1127(g)(2)
                    1127{g)(3)
                    112.7(9)14)
                    1127(g)(5)
  Loading and
  unloading racks
                    1127(h)(2)
               Is the facility fully fenced?
               Are entrance gates locked and/or
               guarded when the facility is not in
               production or is unattended1'
                        Visual
                        Plan review
               Are adequate measures provided to    Visual
               ensure that master flow and dram      Plan review
               valves and other valves that permit
               direct outward flow of the
             I  container's contents to the surface
               remain in closed position when in
               non-operating or non-standby
               status?
               Is the starter control for each oil
               pump accessible only to authorized
               personnel, and kept locked in 'off'
               position, when the pump is in non-
               operating or non-standby status?
                        Visual
                        Plan review
              Are the loading/unloading
              connections of oil pipelines or
              facility piping securely capped or
              blank-flanged when not in service.
              or when in standby for an extended
              period?
                        Visual
                        Plan review
               Is facility lighting appropriate,          Visual
               considering the facility type and       Plan review
               location, to assist in the discovery of
               discharges occurring in hours of
               darkness and to discourage acts of
               vandalism''
              Wo deviation allowed based on
              environmental equivalence

              Are loading/unloading racks          Visual
              equipped with an interlocked          Plan review
              warning light or physical barrier
              system, warning signs, wheel
              chocks, or a vehicle brake interlock
              system to prevent vehicles from
              departing before complete
              disconnection of oil transfer lines?
                     Does the Plan state the reason for nonconformance?
                     Does the Plan descrbe in sufficient detail an alternative
                     measure?
                     Is the alternative measure appropriate for the facility?
                     Does it provide equivalent environmental protection?
                     Is the alternative measure being implemented as
                     described?

                     Does the Plan state the reason for nonconformance?
                     Does the Plan descrbe in sufficient detail an alternative
                     measure?
                     Is the alternative measure appropriate for the facility?
                     Does it provide equivalent environmental protection?
                     Is the alternative measure being implemented as
                     described?
                     Does the Plan state the reason for nonconformance?
                     Does the Plan describe in sufficient detail an alternative
                     measure?
                     Is the after native measure appropriate for the facility?
                     Does it provide equivalent envronmental protection?
                     Is the alternative measure being implemented as
                     described''
                     Does the Plan state the reason for nonconformance''
                     Does the Plan descrbe in sufficient detail an alternative
                     measure?
                     Is the alternative measure appropriate for the facility?
                     Does it provide equivalent envronmental protection''
                     Is the alternative measure being implemented as
                     described?
                                              Does the Plan state the reason for nonconformance?
                                              Does the Plan describe in sufficient detail an alternative
                                              measure?
                                              Is the alternative measure appropriate for the facility?
                                              Does it provide equivalent envronmental protection?
                                              Is the alternative measure being implemented as
                                            :  described?
                                              Does the Plan state the reason for nonconformance?
                                              Does the Plan descrbe in sufficient detail an alternative
                                              measure?
                                              Is the alternative measure appropriate for the facility?
                                              Does it provide equivalent environmental protection?
                                              Is the alternative measure being implemented as
                                              described''
US. Environmental Protection Agency
                                              3-21
                                                             Version  1.0,  11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
  Rule Element
 Relevant    j
Section{»)   I
Evaluation
  Verification
During Site Viiit
Basis for Environmental Equivalence
 Fieid-construcled    112 7(i)
 aboveground
 containers
                    112 7(h)(3)      Are (he lowermost drain and all
                                   outlets ot tank car or tank truck
                                   inspected for signs of discharge
                                   prior to filling and departure of the
                                   vehicles''
                                   Are the drain and outlets tightened,
                                   adjusted, or replaced as necessary
                                   to prevent liquid discharges while in
                                   transit?
              Has the facility conducted an
              evaluation of field-constructed
              aboveground containers
              undergoing repair, alteration,
              reconstruction, or change in service
              that might affect the risK of a
              discharge or failure?
              If a field-constructed aboveground
              container has discharged oil or
              failed due to brittle fracture failure or
              other catastrophe, has the container
              been evaluated and has
              appropriate action been taken?
                                                Visual
                                                Review of procecures
                                                described in the Plan
                                              Does the Plan slate the reason for nonconformance?
                                              Does the Plan describe in sufficient detail an alternative
                                              measure?
                                              Is the alternative measure appropriate for the facility?
                                              Does it provide equivalent envronmental protection?
                                              Is the alternative measure being implemented as
                                              described?
                        Visual
                        Inspection and testing
                        records
                        Brittle fracture
                        evaluation records
                        Plan description of
                        standard by which the
                        brittle fracture
                        evaluation is
                        conducted
                     Does the Plan state the reason for nonconformance?
                     Does the Plan descrbe in sufficient detail an alternative
                     measure'
                     Is the alternative measure appropriate for the facility?
                     Does it provide equivalent envronmental protection?
                     Is the alternative measure being implemented as
                     described?
US. Environmental Protection Agency
                                              3-22
                                                             Version  1.0,11/28/2005

-------
                                                                                       Chapter 3: Environmental Equivalence
  Rule Element
 Relevant
Section)*)
            Evaluation
  Verification
During Site Visit
                           Basis for Environmental Equivalence
 ALL FACILITIES, EXCEPT OIL PRODUCTION
  Facility Drainage
                    and
                    112.8(b)(2)

                    OR
                    and
                    1128(b)(3)
                    and
                    1128(b)(4)

                    OR

                    11212(b)(3)
                    and
                    1128(b)(5)

                    OR
  Bulk Storage
  Containers
                    OR
                    112.12(0(1)
  Diked areas
  Is the facility drainage system or
  effluent treatment system designed
  to control oil discharges? If not, is
  drainage from diked storage areas
  restricted by valves?
  Are dikes equipped with manual
  valves of open-closed design?
  If pumps or ejectors are used to
  empty the dikes, are they manually
i  activated?
I  Is accumulated rainwater inspected
  for the presence of oil prior to
  draining?
  Undiked areas with potential lor a
  discharge
  Does the facility have ponds,
  lagoons, or catchment basins
  designed to capture water from
  other areas with a potential for a
  discharge? If so, are such systems
  designed to retain or return oil to
  the facility? If not, are ditches
  throughout the facility designed to
  flow into a diversion system that
  would retain oil in the facility in the
  event of a discharge?
  If the facility has catchment basins.
  are they located outside areas
  subject to periodic flooding?

  If the facility uses more than one
  treatment unit to treat its drainage
  water, and this treatment is
  continuous and requires pump
  transfer, does the facility have at
  least two 'lift' pumps?


  Are the material and construction of
  containers used for the storage of
  oil compatible with the product
  stored and conditions of storage
  (temperature, pressure, and soil
  conditions)?
Visual
Plan review
Records of drainage
events
Visual
Plan review
Visual
Plan review
Visual
Plan review
Standards of
construction (tank
label), construction
documents and as-
built specifications
                                                                       Does the Plan state the reason for nonconformance?
                                                                       Does the Plan describe in sufficient detail an alternative
                                                                       measure?
                                                                       Is the alternative measure appropriate for the facility?
                                                                       Does it provide equivalent environmental protection?
                                                                       Is the alternative measure being implemented as
                                                                       described?
                                                                        Does the Plan state the reason for nonconformance?
                                                                        Does the Plan describe in sufficient detail an alternative
                                                                        measure?
                                                                        Is the alternative measure appropriate for the facility?
                                                                        Does it provide equivalent environmental protection?
                                                                        Is the alternative measure being implemented as
                                                                        described?
                                                                        Does the Plan state the reason for nonconformance?
                                                                        Does the Plan descrbe in sufficient detail an alternative
                                                                        measure?
                                                                        Is the alternative measure appropriate for the facility?
                                                                        Does it provide equivalent environmental protection?
                                                                        Is the alternative measure being implemented as
                                                                        described?

                                                                        Does the Plan state the reason for nonconformance?
                                                                        Does the Plan descrbe in sufficient detail an alternative
                                                                        measure?
                                                                        Is the alternative measure appropriate for the facility?
                                                                        Does it provide equivalent environmental protection?
                                                                        is the alternative measure being implemented as
                                                                        described?
                    112.8(cX2)     ;  No deviation allowed based on
                                  |  environmental equivalence.
                    OR
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                                  3-23
                                      Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
  Rule Element
  Relevant
 Section |t)
Evaluation
  Verification
During Site Vltlt
112.8(cX3)      Does the facility prevent              Visual
                unsupervised drainage of rainwater    Plan review
OR             into a storm drain or open             Records of drainage
              i  watercourse, or bypassing the         events
112.12(c}(3)     facility treatment system? If so,
                does the facility keep adequate
                records of dike drainage event?

112.8(cX4)      Does the facilrly have completely       Visual
                buried metallic  storage tanks that       Plan review
OR             were installed after January 10.        Installation records
                1974?  If so. are these tanks
112.12(c)(4)     protected from  corrosion by
                coatings or calhodic protection?


1128(cX4)      Does the facility have completely       Visual
                buried metallic  storage tanks that       Plan review
OR             were installed attar January 10.        Inspection and testing
                1974?  Are leak tests performed        records
11212(c)(4)     regularly on these tanks?
                    112.8(cX5)

                    OR
                    112.8(CX6)
                    OR
                    112.8(cX7)
                    Oft
Basis for Environmental Equivalence
                                                                                              Does the Plan slate the reason for nonconformance?
                                                                                              Does the Plan describe in sufficient detail an alternative
                                                                                              measure?
                                                                                              Is the alternative measure appropriate for the facility?
                                                                                              Does it provide equivalent environmental protection?
                                                                                              Is the alternative measure being implemented as
                                                                                              described?

                                                                                            !  Does the Plan state the reason for nonconformance?
                                                                                            j  Does the Plan describe in sufficient detail an alternative
                                                                                            j  measure?
                                                                                            :  Is the alternative measure appropriate for the facility?
                                                                                              Does it provide equivalent environmental protection?
                                                                                              Is the alternative measure being implemented as
                                                                                              described?

                                                                                              Does the Plan state the reason for nonconformance?
                                                                                              Does the Plan describe in sufficient detail an alternative
                                                                                              measure''
                                                                                            :  Is I he alter native measure appropriate for the facility?
                                                                                            j  Does il provide equivalent environmental protection?
                                                                                            !  Is the alternative measure being implemented as
                                                                                              described?
                Does the facility have partially
                buried or bunkered metallic tanks
                used for the storage of oil? II so,
                are these tanks protected from
                corrosion by coatings or cathodic
                protection?
                        Visual
                        Plan review
                        Records
                      Does the Plan state the reason for nonconformance?
                      Does the Plan describe in sufficient detail an alternative
                      measure?
                      Is the alternative measure appropriate for the facility?
                      Does it provide equivalent environmental protection?
                      Is the alternative measure being implemented as
                    '  described?
                Does the facility test each
                aboveground container (including
                foundation and supports) for
                integrity on a regular schedule, and
                whenever a container undergoes
                material repairs''  Do the tests
                combine visual inspection with
                another non-destruclive shell
                testing technique? Does the facility
                frequently inspect the outside of
                each aboveground container for
                signs of deterioration, discharges,
                or accumulation or oil?
                         Plan review             Does the Plan state the reason for nonconformance?
                         Inspection and testing  ,  Does the Plan describe in sufficient detail an alternative
                         records                measure?
                                             i
                                               Is the alternative measure appropriate for the facility?
                                               Does it provide equivalent environmental protection?
                                               Is the alternative measure being implemented as
                                               described?
                Does the facility have containers
                with internal heating coils? Does
                the facility monitor the steam return
                and exhaust lines for contamination
                from infernal healing coils?  Does
                the facility pass the steam return or
                exhaust lines through a settling
                tank, skimmer, or other separation
                or retention system?
                        Visual
                        Container
                        specifications
                        Review of procedures
                        described in the Plan
                      Does the Plan state the reason for nonconformance?
                      Does the Plan describe in sufficient detail an alternative
                      measure?
                      Is the alternative measure appropriate for the facility?
                      Does it provide equivalent environmental protection?
                      Is the alternative measure being implemented as
                      described?
U.S. Environmental Protection  Agency
                                                 3-24
                                                               Version 1.0,  11/28/2005

-------
                                                                                        Chapter 3: Environmental Equivalence
  Rule Element
 Relevant
Section (s)
Evaluation
                                                      Verification
                                                   During Site Visit
Batit for Environmental Equivalence
                    112.8(cX8)
                    11212(c)(8)
                     1128(c)(9)

                     OR

                     11212{c)(9)
               Are containers equipped with at
               least one of the following?
               - High liquid level alarm with audible
               or visual signal connected to a
               constantly attended station.
               - High liquid pump cutoff device.
               - Direct audbte or code signal
               communication between container
               gauger and pumping station.
               - In the case of bulk storage
               containers, a fast response system
               for determining the liquid level
               (computers, telepulse. direct vision
               gauges), combined with the
               continuous presence of personnel
               to monitor filling operations
               Are liquid level sensing devices
               regularly tested to ensure proper
               operation?

               Are effluent treatment facilities
               inspected frequently to delect
               possible system upsets?
1t2.8(cX10)

Oft
                    Off
  Piping
                    OR
                                    Are there visible discharges from
                                    containers, including seams,
                                    gaskets, piping, pumps, valves,
                                    rivets, and bolts? If so, is the facility
                                    promptly addressing such
                                    discharges?
                                    Is there accumulation of oil in diked
                                    areas? IF so. is the facility promptly
                                    removing such accumulations?

                                    No deviation allowed btsed on
                                    environmental equivalence.
               Does the facility have buried piping
               installed after August 16. 2002? If
               so, is this piping protected against
               corrosion by wrapping and coating?
               if this piping cathodically protected?
               Does the facility have any exposed
               buried piping? If so. does the facility
               inspect it for deterioration and
               undertake additional examination
               and corrective action as
               appropriate?
                        Visual
                        Review of test
                        procedures described
                        in the Plan
                        Test records
                                                  Visual
                                                  Plan review
                        Visual
                        Plan review
                        Installation records
                                                                         Does the Plan state the reason for nonconformance?
                                                                         Does the Plan describe in sufficient detail an alternative
                                                                         measure?
                                                                         Is the alternative measure appropriate for the facility?
                                                                         Does it provide equivalent envronmental protection?
                                                                         Is the alternative measure being implemented as
                                                                         described?
                         Inspection and testing
                         records
                         Review of inspection
                         program described in
                         °lan
                                                                         Does the Plan state the reason for nonconformance?
                                                                         Does the Plan descrbe in sufficient detail an alternative
                                                                         measure?
                                                                         Is the alternative measure appropriate for the facility?
                                                                         Does it provide equivalent envronmental protection?
                                                                         Is the alternative measure being implemented as
                                                                         described?
                                               Does the Plan state the reason for nonconformance?
                                               Does the Plan describe in sufficient detail an alternative
                                               measure?
                                               Is the alternative measure appropriate for the facility?
                                               Does it provide equivalent envronmental protection?
                                               Is the alternative measure being implemented as
                                               described?
                                                                         Does the Plan state the reason for nonconformance?
                                                                         Does the Plan descrbe in sufficient detail an alternative
                                                                         measure?
                                                                         Is the alternative measure appropriate for the facility?
                                                                         Does it provide equivalent envronmental protection?
                                                                         Is the alternative measure being implemented as
                                                                         described?
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                                               3-25
                                                               Version  1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
  Rule Element
 Relevant
Section (s)
Evaluation
  Verification
During Site Visit
Bail* for Environmental Equivalence
                    112.8(d)(2)
                    OR
                    112.8(d)(3)
                    11212(d)(3)
                    1128{d)(4)
                    112.8(d)(5}

                    Off

                    11212(d)(5)
               Does the facility have piping that is    Visual
               not in service or is in standby         Plan review
               service for an extended period of
               time? If so, is the terminal
               connection at the transfer point
               capped or blank-flanged, and is it
               marked as to origin?

               Are pipe supports properly            Visual
               designed to minimize abrasion and    Plan review
               corrosion and to allow for expansion
               and contraction?
              Are aboveground valves, piping,
              and appurtenances regularly
              inspected?
              WO TE Inspection program must
              address conditions of items such as
              flange joints, expansion joints, valve
              glands and bodies, catch pans,
              pipeline supports, locking of valves.
              and metal surfaces,
              Is buried piping tested for integrity
              and leaks when installed.
              constructed  relocated or replaced?
               Are all vehicles entering the facility
               appropriately warned to ensure that
               they will net endanger aboveground
               piping and other oil transfer
               operations'
                        Inspection r scores
                        Description of
                        inspection program
                        within the Plan, or
                        reference lo industry
                        standard
                                                                     Visual
                     Does the Plan state the reason for nonconformance?
                     Does the Plan cescrbe in sufficient detail an alternative
                     measure?
                     Is the alternative measure appropriate for the facility?
                     Does it provide equivalent environmental protection?
                     Is the alternative measure being implemented as
                     described?

                     Does the Plan state the reason lor nonconformance?
                     Does the Plan describe in sufficient detail an alternative
                     measure?
                     Is the alternative measure appropriate for the facility?
                     Does it provide equivalent envronmental protection?
                     Is Ihe alternative measure being implemented as
                     described?

                     Does the Plan state the reason for nonconformance?
                     Does the Plan describe in sufficient detail an alternative
                     measure?
                     Is the alternative measure appropriate for the facility?
                     Does it provide equivalent envronmental protection?
                     Is the alternative measure being implemented as
                     described?
                                              Does the Plan state the reason for nonconformance?
                                              Does the Plan descrbe m sufficient detail an alternative
                                              measure''
                                              Is the alternative measure appropriate for the facility?
                                              Does it provide equivalent envronmental protection?
                                              Is Ihe alternative measure being implemented as
                                              described?
US. Environmental Protection Agency
                                              3-26
                                                             Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
                                                                                        Chapter 3: Environmental Equivalence
  Rule Element
 Relevant
 Section ($)
          Evaluation
    Verification
 During Site Visit
     Batla for Environmental Equivalence
  ONSHORE OIL PRODUCTION FACILITIES
                     H2.9(b)(l)
                                    Are drains of dikes or other
                                    containment measures for lank
                                    batteries and separationAreating
                                    areas closed and sealed at all
                                    times, except when draining
                                    uncontaminated rainwater''
                                                  Visual
                                                  Plan review
                                                  Records of drainage
                                                  events
                Is accumulated water inspected       Plan review
                prior to drainage? And is             Records of drainage
                accumulated oil removed and either    events
                returned to storage or disposed of
                properly?
                     1129(b)(2)      Are field drainage systems and oil
                                    traps, sumps, or skimmers regularly
                                    inspected for accumulation of oil?
  Bulk Storage
  Containers
112.9(cX1)
                                                  Visual
                                                  Inspection records
                                                  Inspection program
                                                  described in the Plan,
                                                  including the
                                                  schedule and scope
                                                  Df such inspections
Are the material and construction of
containers used for the storage of
oil compatible with the product
stored and conditions of storage
(temperature, pressure, and soil
conditions)?
Visual
Construction
standards (tank
labels, as-build
specifications, etc.)
Visual indication of
incompatibility, i e.
excessive corrosion
                                                         Does the Plan state the reason for nonconformance?
                                                         Does the Plan descrbe in sufficient detail an alternative
                                                         measure?
                                                         Is the alternative measure appropriate for the facility?
                                                         Does it provide equivalent environmental protection?
                                                         Is the alternative measure being implemented as
                                                         described?

                                                         Does the Plan state the reason for nonconformance?
                                                         Does the Plan descrbe in sufficient detail an alternative
                                                         measure?
                                                         Is the alternative measure appropriate for the facility?
                                                         Does it provide equivalent environmental protection?
                                                         Is the alternative measure being implemented as
                                                         described?
                                                         Does the Plan state the reason for nonconformance?
                                                         Does the Plan descrbe in sufficient detail an alternative
                                                         measure?
                                                         Is the alternative measure appropriate for the facility?
                                                         Does it provide equivalent environmental protection?
                                                         Is the alternative measure being implemented as
                                                         described?
                     112.9(c)(2)       No deviation allowed based an
                                     environmental equivalence

                     112.9(c)(3)       Is each container visually inspected
                                     periodically and on a regular
                                     schedule?
                                     NOTE: Inspections must cover
                                     foundation and support of each
                                     container thai is on or above the
                                     ground surface.

                     112 9(0X4)       Are tank battery installations
                                     engineered to prevent discharges?
                                     - Container capacity is adequate to
                                     prevent overfill if the gauger/pumper
                                     is delayed in making a schedule
                                     round
                                     • Equipped with overflow equalizing
                                   i  lines between containers
                                   I  - Adequate vacuum protection to
                                     prevent container collapse during
                                   !  transfer of oil
                                     - High level sensors if the facility is
                                     subject to a computer production
                                     control system
Does the Plan state the reason for nonconformance?
Does the Plan describe in sufficient detail an alternative
measure?
Is the alternative measure appropriate for the facility?
Does it provide equivalent envronmental protection?
Is the alternative measure being implemented as
described?
                                                  Inspection and testing
                                                  records
                                                  Inspection program
                                                  described in the Plan,
                                                  including scope and
                                                  frequency of such
                                                  inspections

                                                  Visual
                                                  Plan review
                                                         Does the Plan state the reason for nonconformance?
                                                         Does the Plan describe in sufficient detail an alternative
                                                         measure?
                                                         Is the alternative measure appropriate for the facility?
                                                         Does it provide equivalent environmental protection?
                                                         Is the alternative measure being implemented as
                                                         described?

                                                         Does the Plan state the reason for nonconformance?
                                                         Does the Plan descrbe in sufficient detail an alternative
                                                         measure?
                                                         Is the alternative measure appropriate for the facility?
                                                         Does it provide equivalent environmental protection?
                                                         Is the alternative measure being implemented as
                                                         described?
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                                                3-27
                                                                         Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
Rule Element Relevant
Section (s)
Transfer 112.9(d)(1>
Evaluation
Are alt aboveground valves and
operations pp ng inspected periodically a nd
upon a regular schedule'
NOTE: Inspections must cover

items suc/i as flange joints, vah/e
glands and bodies, drip pans, pipe



112.9(d)(2)






1l2.9(d)(3}


supports pumping weil polish rod
stuffing boxes, and bleeder and
gauge valves
Are saltwater disposal facilities
inspected, particularly following a
sudden change in atmospheric
temperature?



Does the facility have a program of
flowline maintenance?









Verification
During Site Visit
Inspection and test ing
records
Baiii for Environmental Equivalence
Does the Plan state the reason for nonconformance?
Does the Plan descrbe in sufficient detail an alternative
Inspection program measure?
described in the Plan, Is the alternative measure appropriate for the facility'
including frequency
Does it provide equivalent environmental protection?
and scope of Is the alternative measure being implemented as
inspections described?




Plan review , Does the Plan slate the reason for nonconformance?
Inspection and test ing
records



Does the Plan describe in sufficient detail an alternative
measure?
Is the alternative measure appropriate for the facility?
Does it provide equivalent environmental protection?
Is the alternative measure being implemented as
described?
Inspection and
maintenance records
Program of flowline
maintenance
described in the Plan,
including the scope
Does the Plan state the reason for nonconformance?
Does the Plan describe in sufficient detail an alternative
measure?
Is the alternative measure appropriate for the facility?
Does it provide equivalent environmental protection?
Is the alternative measure being implemented as
and frequency of j described?
maintenance |
US. Environmental Protection Agency
3-28
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
                                                                                      Chapter 3: Environmental Equivalence
  Rule Element
 Relevant
 Section (s)
           Evaluation
   Verification
 During Site Visit
     Basis for Environmental Equivalence
 ONSHORE OIL DRILLING AND WORKOVER FACILITIES
  Mobile (tilling of
  workover
  equipment
  Containment
  Blowout
  prevention
11210(d)
               Is the equpment located so as to
               prevent a discharge?
                                   Visual
                                   Plan review
                      Does trie Plan state the reason for nonconformance?
                      Does the Plan descrbe in sufficient detail an alternative
                      measure?
                      Is the alternative measure appropriate for the facility?
                      Does it provide equivalent envronmental protection?
                      Is the alternative measure being implemented as
                      described?
               No deviation allowed based on
               environmental equivalence
  If drilling below any casing string, or    Visual
               during workover operations, are a
               blowout prevention assembly and
               well control system installed?
               Are the blowout assembly and well
               control system capable of
               controlling well-head pressure?
                                    Installation record
                                    Plan review
                      Does the Plan state the reason for nonconfomiance?
                      Does the Plan descrbe in sufficient detail an alternative
                      measure?
                      Is the alternative measure appropriate for the facility?
                      Does it provide equivalent environmental protection?
                      Is the alternative measure being implemented as
                      described?
  OFFSHORE OIL DRILLING, PRODUCTION AND WORKOVER FACILITIES
  Drainage
112.11(6)
                    H2.11(b)
  Is oil drainage collection equpment
  used to prevent and control small
  discharges? Are facility drains
  directed toward a central collection
!  sump?

  If a sump Is not practicable, is oil
  removed from collection equipment
  as often as necessary to prevent
  overflow?
                                   If a sump system is employed, are
                                   the sizes of pump and sump
                                   adequate?  Is a spare pump
                                   available?
Visual
Plan review
                                                 Visual
                                                 Oil removal
                                                 procedures described
                                                 in the Plan
                                                 Visual
                                                 Plan review
                                   If a sump system is employed, does    Visual
                                   the facility have in place a regularly    Preventive
                                 , scheduled preventive maintenance    maintenance
                                   inspection and testing program to
                                   assure reliable operation?
                                   If required by the conditions, are a
                                   redundant automatic sump pump
                                   and control devices provided?
                                                 inspection and testing
                                                 program described in
                                                 the Plan
See below for cases where a sump is not practicable
                      Does the Plan state the reason for nonconformance?
                      Does the Plan describe in sufficient detail an alternative
                      measure?
                      Is the alternative measure appropriate for the facility?
                      Does it provide equivalent environmental protection?
                      Is the alternative measure being implemented as
                      described?

                      Does the Plan state the reason for nonconformance?
                      Does the Plan descrbe in sufficient detail an alternative
                      measure?
                      Is the alternative measure appropriate for the facility?
                      Does it provide equivalent environmental protection?
                      Is the alternative measure being implemented as
                      described?
                                                         Does the Plan state the reason for nonconformance?
                                                         Does the Plan describe in sufficient detail an alternative
                                                         measure?
                                                         Is the alternative measure appropriate for the facility?
                                                         Does it provide equivalent environmental protection?
                                                         Is the alternative measure being implemented as
                                                         described?
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                                               3-29
                                                                         Version  1.0,  11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
   Rule Element
  Relevant
 Section(i)
  Separators and
  Treaters
  Containers
                    112.11(9)
  Pollution
  prevention
  equipment and
  systems
112.11(1)
          Evaluation
    Verification
 During Site Visit
                Does the Facility have areas where
                separators and trealers are
                equipped with dump valves which
                predominantly fail in the closed
                position and where the pollution risk
                is high?  If so  is the facility specially
                equipped to prevent the discharge
                of oil, including:
                - Extending the flare line to a diked
                area if the separator is near shore?
                - Equipping the separator with a
                high liquid level sensor that will
                automatically shut in wells
                producing to the separator  or
                installing parallel redundant dump
                valves?

                Are atmospheric storage or surge
                containers equipped with high liquid
                level sensing devices that activate
                an alarm or control the flow?
                                   Visual
                                   Description of
                                   inspection and
                                   maintenance of
                                   separators and heater
                                   treaters (including
                                   dump valves) in the
                                   Plan, including the
                                   schedule and scope
                                   of such inspections.
                                                                       Visual
                                                                       Plan review
                                    Are pressure containers equipped
                                    with high and low pressure sensing
                                    devices that activate an alarm or
                                    control the flow?
                                                  Visual
                                                  Plan review
                Are containers equipped with
                suitable corrosion protection?
                                   Visual
                                   Plan review
                                    Does the Plan contain a written
                                    procedure for inspecting and testing
                                    pollution control equipment and
                                    systems?
Are the pollution prevention
equipment and systems tested and
inspected on a scheduled periodic
basis?
Are the procedures documented in
the Plan?
                                                                       Plan review
Inspection and testing
records
Description of
inspection and testing
program in Plan.
including scope and
frequency
     Basi* for Environmental Equivalence
                       Does the Plan state the reason for nonconformance?
                       Does the Plan descrfoe in sufficient detail an alternative
                       measure?
                       Is the alternative measure appropriate for the facility?
                       Does it provide equivalent envronmental protection?
                       Is trie alternative measure being implemented as
                       described?
                                                         Does the Plan state the reason for nonconformance?
                                                         Does the Plan descrbe in sufficient detail an alternative
                                                         measure?
                                                         Is tie alternative measure appropriate for the facility?
                                                         Does it provide equivalent envronmental protection?
                                                         Is the alternative measure being implemented as
                                                         described?
                                                         Does the Plan stale the reason for nonconformance?
                                                         Does the Plan describe in sufficient detail an alternative
                                                         measure?
                                                         Is the alternative measure appropriate for the facility?
                                                         Does it provide equivalent envionmental protection?
                                                         Is the alternative measure being implemented as
                                                         described?
Does the Plan state the reason for nonconformance?
Does the Plan describe in sufficient detail an alternative
measure?
Is the alternative measure appropriate for the facility?
Does it provide equivalent envronmental protection?
Is the alternative measure being implemented as
described?

Does the Plan state the reason for nonconformance?
Does the Plan describe in sufficient detail an alternative
measure?
Is the alternative measure appropriate for the facility?
Does it provide equivalent envronmental protection?
Is the alternative measure being implemented as
described?

Does the Plan state the reason for nonconformance?
Does the Plan describe in sufficient detail an alternative
measure?
Is the alternative measure appropriate for the facility?
Does it provide equivalent envronmental protection?
Is the alternative measure being implemented as
described?
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                                                3-30
                                                                         Version 1.0,  11/28/2005

-------
                                                                                         Chapter 3: Environmental Equivalence
  Rule Element
  Relevant   |
 Section («)   j
          Evaluation
                    11211(1)
  Well shut-in
  valves
112.11®
  Blowout
  Prevention
  Flowlines
                     11211(1)
  Piping
                     112.11(0)
  Verification
During Site Viiit
                Is the facility using simulated
                discharges for testing and
                inspecting human and equpment
                pollution control and
                countermeasure systems?
                                   Description of testing
                                   program in Plan
Basis for Environmental Equivalence
Is the method of activation or
control of well shut-in valves and
devices described in sufficient
details?
If drilling below any casing string or
during workover assembly, is a
blowout preventer (BOP) assembly
and well control system installed'' If
the BOP assembly and well control
system capable of controlling well-
head pressure that may be
encountered''

Are manifolds (headers) equipped
with check valves on individual
flowlines?
                                                                       Plan review
                                                   Visual
                                                   Plan review
                                                   Installation records
                                                   Visual
                                                   Plan review
                                     Are all flowlines equipped with a
                                     high pressure sensing device and
                                     shut-in valve at the wellhead? If
                                     not, is a pressure relief system
                                     provided for flowlines?
                                                   Visual
                                                   Plan review
                Is all ppirig appurtenant to the
                facility protected from corrosion,
                such as with protective coating or
                cathodic protection?
                                   Visual
                                   Plan review
                                   Installation records
                Is sub-marine piping adequately
                protected against environmental
                stresses and other activities such
                as fishing operations?
                     Does the Plan state the reason for nonconformance?
                     Does the Plan describe in sufficient detail an alternative
                     measure?
                     Is the alternative measure appropriate for the facility?
                     Does it provide equivalent environmental protection?
                     Is the alternative measure being implemented as
                     described?
                     Does the Plan state the reason for nonconformance?
                     Does the Plan describe in sufficient detail an alternative
                     measure?
                     Is the alternative measure appropriate for the facility?
                     Does it provide equivalent envronmental protection?
                     Is the alternative measure being implemented as
                     described?

                   i Does the Plan state the reason for nonconformance?
                     Does the Plan describe in sufficient detail an alternative
                     measure?
                     Is the alternative measure appropriate for the facility?
                     Does it provide equivalent environmental protection?
                     Is the alternative measure being implemented as
                     described''


                     Does the Plan state the reason for nonconformance?
                     Does the Plan describe in sufficient detail an alternative
                     measure?
                     Is the alternative measure appropriate (of the facility?
                     Does it provide equivalent environmental protection?
                     Is the alternative measure being implemented as
                     described?

                     Does the Plan state the reason for nonconformance?
                     Does the Plan describe in sufficient detail an alternative
                     measure?
                     Is the alternative measure appropriate for the facility?
                     Does it provide equivalent envronmental protection''
                     Is the alternative measure being implemented as
                     described?
                      Does the Plan state the reason for nonconformance?
                      Does the Plan describe in sufficient detail an alternative
                      measure?
                      Is the alternative measure appropriate for the facility?
                      Does it provide equivalent envronmental protection?
                      Is the alternative measure being implemented as
                      described?
                                   Inspection and
                                   maintenance program
                                   described in Plan
                                   Installation records
                    :  Does the Plan state the reason for nonconformance?
                      Does the Plan descrbe in sufficient detail an alternative
                      measure?
                      Is the alternative measure appropriate for the facility?
                      Does it provide equivalent environmental protection''
                      Is the alternative measure being implemented as
                      described?
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                                                 3-31
                                                                         Version  1.0,  11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
  Rule Element
 Relevant
Section («)
Evaluation
  Verification
During Site Vtott
                  112.11(p)       Does the facility have a program to
                                inspect or test sub-marine piping for
                                failures according to a regular
                                schedule?
                                Does the facility maintain a record
                                ol these inspections or tests'
                                            inspection and testing
                                            records
                                            Review of inspection
                                            or testing program
                                            described in Plan,
                                            including scope and
                                            frequency of
                                            inspections or tests	
Bail* for Environmental Equivalence
                                          Does the Plan state the reason for nonconforrnance?
                                          Does the Plan descrbe in sufficient detail an alternative
                                          measure?
                                          Is the alternative measure appropriate for the facility?
                                          Does if provide equivalent environmental protection?
                                          Is the alternative measure being implemented as
                                          described?
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                                          3-32
                                                        Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
                                      Chapter 4: Secondary Containment and Impracticability
         SECONDARY CONTAINMENT AND IMPRACTICABILITY

                                DETERMINATIONS


4.1    Introduction

       The purpose of the SPCC rule is to prevent discharges of oil into navigable waters of the
United States and adjoining shorelines. One of the primary ways through which the rule sets out to
do this is the secondary containment requirements. A secondary containment system provides an
essential line of defense in the event of a failure of an oil container {primary containment), such as a
bulk storage container, a mobile or portable container, pipes or flowlines, or other oil-filled
operational equipment. The system provides temporary containment of spilled oil until the
appropriate response actions are taken to abate the source of the discharge and remove oil from
areas where  it has accumulated before the oil reaches navigable waters and adjoining shorelines.
The secondary containment requirements are divided into two categories:

             General provisions address the potential for oil discharges from all regulated parts
             of a facility. Containment method, design, and capacity are determined by good
             engineering practice to contain an oil discharge until cleanup occurs.

             Specific provisions address the potential of oil discharges from specific parts of a
             facility where oil is stored or handled. The containment design, sizing, and freeboard
             requirements are specified by the SPCC rule to address a major container failure.

       The general secondary containment requirements are intended to address the most likely oil
discharge from bulk storage containers; mobile/portable containers; production tank battery,
treatment,  and separation installations; a particular piece of oil-filled operational or process
equipment; (non-rack) transfer activity;  or piping in accordance with good engineering practice. The
specific secondary containment requirements are  intended to address a major container failure (the
entire contents of the container and/or compartment) associated with a bulk storage container;
single compartment of a tank car or tank truck at a loading/unloading rack; mobile/portable
containers; and production tank batteries, treatment, and separation installations. These specific
provisions  (see Table 4.1 in Section 4.2) explicitly provide requirements for sizing, design, and
freeboard that need to be addressed in the SPCC Plan.

       The purpose of this chapter is to clarify the relationships among the various general  and
specific secondary containment requirements of the SPCC rule, and to demonstrate how these
requirements apply. This chapter also discusses the rule's impracticability determination provision,
which may be used when a facility owner/operator is incapable of installing secondary containment
by any reasonable method. The additional requirements that accompany an impracticability
determination, the documentation needed to support such a determination, and the role of the EPA
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
4-1
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
inspector in reviewing secondary containment requirements and impracticability determinations are
also discussed.

       The remainder of this chapter is organized as follows:

       •      Section 4.2 provides an overview of the SPCC rule's secondary containment
             provisions,  both general and specific. It also discusses related issues, such as
             active versus passive measures, the "sufficiently impervious" requirement, and
             facility drainage.  The role of the EPA inspector in evaluating compliance with the
             rule provisions is discussed for each of these subjects.
       •      Section 4.3 describes the impracticability determination provision.
             Section 4.4 discusses how the impracticability determination may be used in  certain
             circumstances.
             Section 4.5 describes required measures when secondary containment is
             impracticable.
             Section 4.6 describes the role of the EPA inspector in  reviewing impracticability
             determinations.

4.2   Overview of Secondary Containment Provisions

       The SPCC rule includes several different secondary containment provisions intended to
address the various activities or locations at a facility in which oil is handled.  This section
differentiates among the general and specific secondary containment provisions.

       Table 4-1 lists all the secondary containment provisions of the SPCC rule for different types
of facilities.
US. Environmental Protection Agency
4-2
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
                                         Chapter 4: Secondary Containment and Impracticability
Table 4-1. Secondary containment provisions in 40 CFR part 112.
Type of Facility
All Facilities
Onshore Storage
Onshore Production
Onshore Oil Drilling and
Workover
Offshore Oil Drilling,
Production, and
Workover
Secondary Containment
General containment (areas with potential for
discharge, e.g., piping, oil-filled operating and
manufacturing equipment, and non-rack
related transfer areas)
Loading/unloading racks*,**
Bulk storage containers*
Mobile or portable oil containers*
Bulk storage containers, including tank
batteries, separation, and treating facility
installations*
Mobile drilling or workover equipment
Oil drilling, production, or workover equipment
Rule Section(s)
112.7(c)
112.7(h)(1)
112.8(c)(2)or112.12(c)(2)
~—
112.9(c)(2)
112.10(0
112.7(c)
* Sized secondary containment requirement, as discussed in Section 4.2.2.
" Although Ihis requirement applies to all facilities, loading and unloading rack equipment is often not present at typical
production facilities, as discussed in Section 4.4.2.

       Figures 4-1 through 4-4 illustrate the relationships between the secondary containment
requirements at various types of facilities.  EPA inspectors should use the flowchart that
corresponds to the type of facility he or she is visiting (see the uppermost box in each flowchart).
Types of containers, equipment, and activities or areas where oil is handled are identified in the
second row of the flowchart, with reference to the appropriate secondary containment rule
provision. The flowcharts note the use of impracticability determinations and additional design
considerations for other areas with the potential for discharge.
US. Environmental Protection Agency
4-3
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
Figure 4-1.  Secondary containment provisions in 40 CFR part 112 related to onshore storage
facilities (§§112.7 and 112.8 or 112.12).
                    i Onshore Storage Facility
                    |        §112.7(0)
  t.«Kltn«!
u«!««dwig r»*k
Dtkirf Ji-t>4s:
S1128S&SC1]
ara
^1!3«(KXS)
: Urtdihsa a»*as:
: 5«aea»x35
cr
; 'sMS.BfeK*;
                                                     wiift j>afa»«lal Jet
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                         4-4
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
                                       Chapter 4: Secondary Containment and Impracticability
Figure 4-2. Secondary containment provisions in 40 CFR part 112 related to onshore production
facilities (§§112.7 and 112.9).
                             Onshore Production FaciHty
                                       §112.7(c)


                                                      Other a»«ss** with
                           - PittpiOTEt K pftf
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
4-5
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
Figure 4-3. Secondary containment provisions in 40 CFR part 112 related to onshore oil drilling
and workover facilities {§§112.7 and 112.10).
                                   Onshore Oil Drilling
                                  and Workover Facility
                                         §112.7(c)
                        baste
                             .•_*.".".-.•»•••"*•••"•" ••"•"-"•"•*•"••••
        Otter ares*
           potential tof
                                             1
                            §112.r{ti) Iroprscteesbility Dstermlnaflon
                                        108 cor&i^ancy p&n.
                             Ptovida s >A?fcs»ri caflwttnisrt; o-f
                                               tt*^& shifting &atjsptr>iff>t.
L/.S. Environmental Protection Agency
4-6
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
                                        Chapter 4: Secondary Containment and Impracticability
Figure 4-4. Secondary containment provisions in 40 CFR part 112 related to offshore oil drilling,
production, and workover facilities (§§112.7 and 112.11).
       Offshore Oil Drilling, Production
             and Workover Facility
            ! drainage
                                 j —
                       ,rj:ej only
                                                   Provide s wiser) owrsTijtesTt o^ irt&npcmsf.
                                 sumps sr* i
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
4-7
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
 SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
4.2.1   General Secondary Containment Requirement
       At a regulated facility, all areas with
the potential for a discharge are subject to
the general secondary containment
provision, §112.7(c). These areas may have
bulk storage containers; mobile/portable
containers; production tank batteries,
treatment, and separation installations;
pieces of oil-filled operational or
manufacturing equipment; loading/unloading
areas (also referred to as transfer areas);
piping; and may include other areas of a
facility where oil is present. The general
secondary containment provision requires
that these areas be designed with
appropriate containment and/or diversionary
structures to prevent a discharge that  may
be harmful (a discharge as described  in
§112.1 (b)}. "Appropriate containment"
should be designed to address the most
likely discharge from the primary
containment system such that the discharge will
§112.7(c)
Provide appropriate containment and/or diversionary
structures or equipment to prevent a discharge as
described in §112.1 (b). The entire containment system,
including walls and floor, must be capable of containing oil
and must be constructed so that any discharge from a
primary containment system, such as a tank or pipe, will
not escape the containment system before cleanup occurs.
At a minimum, you must use one of the following
prevention systems or its equivalent
(1) For onshore facilities:
(i) Dikes, berms, or retaining walls sufficiently impervious to
contain oil;
(ii) Curbing;
(iii) Culvertng, gutters, or other drainage systems;
(iv) Weirs, booms, or other barriers;
(v) Spill diversion ponds;
(vi) Retention ponds; or
(vii) Sorbent materials.
(2) For offshore facilities:
(i) Curbing or drip pans; or
(ii) Sumps and collection systems.

Note: The above text is an excerpt of the SPCC rule. Refer to 40
CFR part 112 for the full text of the rule.
not escape containment before cleanup occurs.
       Section 112.7(c) lists several methods of providing secondary containment, which are
described in Table 4-2.  These methods are examples only; other containment methods may be
used, consistent with good engineering practice.  For example, a facility could use an oil/water
separator, combined with a drainage system, to collect and retain discharges of oil within the
facility. Certification of the SPCC Plan verifies that whatever secondary containment methods are
selected are appropriate for the facility and that they follow good engineering practice.
   Discharge as described in §112.1(b) is a discharge "in quantities that may be harmful, as described in part 110
   of this chapter [40 CFR part 110], into or upon the navigable waters of the United States or adjoining shorelines,
   or into or upon the waters of the contiguous zone, or in connection with activities under the Outer Continental
   Shelf Lands Act or the Deepwater Port Act of 1974, or that may affect natural resources belonging to,
   appertaining to, or under the exclusive management authority of the United States (including resources under the
   Magnusort Fishery Conservation and Management Act)..."

   Note: The above text is an excerpt of the SPCC rule. Refer to 40 CFR part 112 for the full text of the rule.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
4-8
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
                                           Chapter 4:  Secondary Containment and Impracticability
Table 4-2. Example methods of secondary containment listed in §112.7(c).
       Secondary
  Containment Method
                        Description of Examples
 Dikes, berms, or
 retaining walls
 sufficiently impervious to
 contain oil
 Curbing
 Culverting, gutters, or
 other drainage systems
 Weirs
 Booms
 Barriers
Types of permanent engineered barriers, such as raised earth embankments or
concrete containment walls, designed to hold oil. Normally used in areas with
potential for large discharges, such as single or multiple aboveground storage
tanks and certain piping.  Temporary dikes and berms may be constructed after
a discharge is discovered as an active containment measure (or a
countermeasure) so long as they can be implemented in time to prevent the
spilled oil from reaching surface waters. Please see Section 4.2.6, Passive
Versus Active Measures of Secondary Containment.
Typically consists of a permanent reinforced concrete or an asphalt apron
surrounded by a concrete curb.  Can also be of a uniform, rectangular cross-
section or combined with mountable curb sections to allow access to
loading/unloading vehicles and materials handling equipment. Can be used
where only small spills are expected and also used  to direct spills to drains or
catchment areas. Temporary curbing may be constructed after a discharge is
discovered as an active containment measure (or a countermeasure) so long as
it can be implemented in time to prevent the spilled  oil from reaching surface
waters.  Please see Section 4.2.6, Passive Versus Active Measures of
Secondary Containment.
Types of permanent drainage systems designed to  direct spills to remote
containment or treatment areas.  Ideal for situations where spill containment
structures cannot or should not be located immediately adjacent to the potential
spill source.
Dam-like structures with a notch through which oil may flow to be collected.
Generally used in combination with skimmers to remove oil from the surface of
water.
Form a continuous barrier placed as a precautionary measure to contain/collect
oil.  Typically used for the containment, exclusion, or deflection of oil floating on
water, and is usually associated with an oil spill contingency or facility response
plan to address oil spills that have reached surface waters. Beach booms are
designed to work in shallow or tidal areas. Sorbent-filled booms can be used for
land-based spills.  There are very limited applications for use of booms for land-
based containment of discharged oil.
Spill mats, storm drain covers, and dams used to block or prevent the flow of oil.
Temporary barriers may be put in place prior to a discharge or after a discharge
is discovered.  These are both considered effective active containment
measures (or countermeasures) as long as they can be implemented in time to
prevent the spilled oil from reaching navigable waters and adjoining shorelines.
Please see Section 4.2.6, Passive Versus Active Measures of Secondary
Containment.
US. Environmental Protection Agency
                      4-9
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
       Secondary
  Containment Method
                       Description of Examples
 Spill diversion ponds
 and retention ponds
Designed for long-term or permanent containment of storm water capable to
capture and hold oil or runoff and prevent it from entering surface water bodies.
Temporary spill diversion ponds and retention ponds may be constructed after a
discharge is discovered as an active containment measure (or countermeasure)
as long as they can be implemented in time to prevent the spilled oil from
reaching navigable waters and adjoining shorelines.  There are very limited
applications for use of temporary spill diversion and retention ponds for land-
based containment of discharged oil due to the timely availability of the
appropriate excavation equipment required to rapidly construct the ponds.
Please see Section 4.2.6, Passive Versus Active Measures of Secondary
Containment.
 Sorbent materials
Insoluble materials or mixtures of materials (packaged in forms such as spill
pads, pillows, socks, and mats) used to recover liquids through the mechanisms
of absorption, adsorption, or both. Materials include clay, vermiculite,
diatomaceous earth, and man-made materials.  Used to isolate and contain
small drips or leaks until the source of the leak is repaired. Commonly used
with material handling equipment, such as valves and pumps. Also used as an
active containment measure (or countermeasure) to contain and collect small-
volume discharges before they reach waterways. Please see Section 4.2.6,
Passive Versus Active Measures of Secondary Containment.
 Drip pans
Used to isolate and contain small drips or leaks until the source of the leak is
repaired.  Drip pans are commonly used with product dispensing containers
(usually drums), uncoupling of hoses during bulk transfer operations, and for
pumps, valves, and fittings.
 Sumps and collection
 systems
A permanent pit or reservoir and the troughs/trenches connected to it that
collect oil.
4.2.2  Specific Secondary Containment Requirements

       While ail parts of a regulated facility with potential for a discharge are, at a minimum, subject
to the general secondary containment requirements of §112.7{c), areas where certain types of
containers, activities, or equipment are located may be subject to additional, more stringent
containment requirements, including specifications for minimum capacity (see Table 4-1.) The
SPCC rule specifies a required minimum size for secondary containment for the following areas:

              Bulk storage containers;
              Loading/unloading racks;
              Mobile or portable bulk storage containers; and
              Production facility bulk storage containers, including tank batteries,  separation, and
              treating vessels/equipment.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                     4-10
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
                                        Chapter 4: Secondary Containment and Impracticability
       The applicable requirements for each of these types of containers or equipment are
discussed in more detail in Section 4.4 of this chapter. In general, provisions for sized secondary
containment require that the chosen containment method be sized to contain the largest single oil
compartment or container plus "sufficient freeboard" to contain precipitation, as discussed in
Section 4.2.4 below.  Specific freeboard sizing  requirements apply to all of the areas listed above
except loading/unloading racks.

       EPA inspectors should note that the "largest single compartment" may consist of containers
that are permanently manifolded together. Permanently manifolded tanks are tanks that are
designed, installed, or operated in such a manner that the multiple containers function as a single
storage unit (67 FR 47122). Accordingly, the total capacity of manifolded containers is the design
capacity standard for the sized secondary containment provisions (plus freeboard in certain cases).

4.2.3   Role of the EPA Inspector in Evaluating Secondary Containment Methods

       The EPA inspector should evaluate whether the secondary containment system is adequate
for the facility, and whether it is maintained to contain any oil discharges to navigable waters and
adjoining shorelines. Some Hems that the inspector should look for include:

       For a dike, berm, or other engineered secondary containment system:

             Capacity of the system to contain oil as determined by the Professional Engineer
             (PE) in accordance with good engineering practice and the requirements of the rule;
             Cracks in containment system materials (e.g., concrete, liners, coatings, earthen
             materials);
             Discoloration;
             Presence of spilled or leaked material (standing liquid);
             Corrosion of the system;
       •      Erosion of the system;
             Level of precipitation in diked area and available capacity versus design capacity;
             Dike or berm permeability;
       •      Presence of debris;
       •      Operational status of drain valves or other drainage controls;
       *      Location/status of pipes, inlets, and drainage around and beneath containers;
             Excessive vegetation that may inhibit visual inspection and assessment of berm
             integrity;
             Large-rooted plant systems (e.g., shrubs, cacti, trees) that could affect the berm
             integrity;
             Holes or penetrations to the containment system created by burrowing animals; and
       •      Drainage records for rainwater discharges from containment areas.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
4-11
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
       For retention and drainage ponds:

              Capacity of the system to contain oil as determined by the PE in accordance with
              good engineering practice and the requirements of the rule;
              Erosion of the system;
       •       Cracks in containment system materials (e.g , concrete, liners, coatings, earthen
              materials);
       •       Discoloration;
       •       Design capacity versus available capacity;
              Presence of spilled or leaked liquid;
              Presence of debris;
              Stressed vegetation;
              Evidence of water seeps from the system; and
              Operational status of drain valves or other drainage controls.

       Some of the items listed above are discussed in more detail in later sections of this
guidance document.

4.2.4  Sufficient Freeboard

       The SPCC rule does not specifically define the term "sufficient freeboard," nor does it
describe how to calculate this volume. The 1991 proposed amendment to the SPCC rule
recommended the use of industry standards and data on 25-year storm events to determine the
appropriate freeboard capacity. Numerous commenters on the 1991 proposal questioned the 25-
year storm event recommendation and suggested alternatives, such as using 110 percent of
storage tank capacity or using other characteristic storm events.  EPA addressed these comments
in the preamble to the 2002 rule:

       We believe that the proper standard of "sufficient freeboard" to contain precipitation is that
       amount necessary to contain precipitation from a 25-year, 24-hour storm event That
       standard allows flexibility for varying climatic conditions.  It is also the standard required for
       certain tank systems storing or treating hazardous waste. (67 FR 47117)

       However, EPA did not set this standard as a requirement for freeboard capacity. Therefore,
the use of precipitation data from a 25-year, 24-hour storm event is not enforceable as a standard
for containment freeboard.  In the preamble, EPA stated:

       While we believe that the 25-year, 24-hour storm event standard is appropriate for most
       facilities and protective of the environment, we are not making it a rule standard because of
       the difficulty and expense  for some  facilities of securing recent information concerning such
       storm events at this time.

       Ultimately EPA determined that, for freeboard, the proper method of secondary
containment is a matter of engineering practice so [EPA does] not prescribe here any particular
method" (67 FR 47101). However, where data are available, the  facility owner/operator (and

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency         4-12                      Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
                                        Chapter 4: Secondary Containment and Impracticability
certifying PE) should consider the appropriateness of the 25-year, 24-hour storm event precipitation
level as a matter of good engineering practice.

       EPA recognizes that a "110 percent of storage tank capacity" rule of thumb may be a
potentially acceptable design criterion in many situations, and that aboveground storage tank
regulations in many states require that secondary containment be sized to contain at least 110
percent of the volume of the largest tank. However, in some areas, 110 percent of storage tank
capacity may not provide enough volume to contain precipitation from storm events.  Some states
require that facilities consider storm events when designing secondary containment structures, and
in certain cases these requirements translate to more stringent sizing criteria than the 110 percent
rule of thumb. Other important factors may be considered in determining necessary secondary
containment capacity. According to practices recommended by industry groups such as the
American Petroleum Institute (API), these factors include:

              Local precipitation conditions (rainfall and/or snowfall);
              Height of the existing dike wall;
              Size of tank/container;
              Safety considerations; and
              Frequency of dike drainage and inspection.

       The following examples (Figure 4-5 and Figure 4-6) present secondary containment size
calculations for hypothetical oil storage areas. The certifying PE determines what is sufficient
freeboard for precipitation for secondary containment and should document how the determination
was made along with supporting calculations in the SPCC Plan.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency        4-13                     Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
Figure 4-5. Sample calculation of containment size, using two design criteria.
  The following example compares two different design criteria: one based on the volume of the tank and one based on
  precipitation.

  Scenario:
  A 20,000-gallon horizontal tank is placed within an engineered secondary containment structure, such as a concrete
  dike. The tank is 35 feet long by 10 feet in diameter.  The secondary containment area provides a 5-foot buffer on all
  sides (i.e., dike dimensions are 45 feet x 20 feet).
                      2011
                                                            Height;
 Given the dike footprint, we want to determine the wall height necessary to provide sufficient freeboard for
 precipitation, based on (1) the tank storage capacity; (2) actual precipitation data.  Several storm events in the recent
 past caused precipitation in amounts between 3.6 and 4.0 inches at this location, although greater amounts have also
 been reported  in the past.
 Note: The factor for converting cubic feet to gallons is 7.48 gallons/ft3.

 1. Calculation of secondary containment capacity, based on a design criterion of 110% of tank storage
 capacity:

 Containment surface area = 45 ft x 20 ft = 900 ft2
 Tank volume, based on 100% of tank capacity = 20,000 gallons
 Tank volume, in cubic feet = 20,000 gallons / 7.48 gallons/ft3 = 2,674 ft3
 Wall height that would contain the tank's volume = 2,674 ft3 / 900 ft2 = 2.97 ft

 Containment capacity with freeboard, based on  110% of tank capacity = 22,000 gallons
 Containment capacity, in cubic feet = 22,000 gallons / 7.48 gallons/ft3 = 2,941 ft3
 Vtell height equivalent to 110% of storage capacity = 2,941 ft3/ 900 ft2 = 3.27 feet
 Height of freeboard = 3.27 ft - 2.97 ft = 0.3 ft = 3 6 inches

 Therefore, a dike design based on a criterion of 110% of tank capacity provides a dike wall height of 3.27 feet.

 2. Calculation of secondary containment capacity, based on rainfall criterion:

 After a review of historical precipitation data for the vicinity of the facility, the PE determined that a 4.5 inch rain event
 is the most reasonable design criterion for this diked area.

 Containment surface area = 45 ft x 20 ft = 900 ft*
 Tank volume, based on 100% of tank capacity = 20,000 gallons
 Tank volume, in cubic feet = 20,000 gallons / 7.48 gallons/ft3 = 2,674 ft3
 Wall height that would contain the tank's volume = 2,674 ft3 / 900 ft2 = 2.97 ft

 The height of the dike would need to be 3.35 feet (2.97 ft + 4.5 in).

 4.5 inches / 12 inches = .375 ft + 2.97 ft = 3.35  ft

 Therefore, a dike design based on a 4.5 inch  rain event provides a dike wall height of 3.35, or 0.9 inch higher than
 calculated using the  110% criterion.

 Conclusion:  As noted from the comparison of the two design criteria illustrated above, the dike heights are similar.
 The adequacy of the secondary containment free board is ultimately an engineering determination made by the PE and
 certified in the  Plan.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
4-14
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
                                               Chapter 4:  Secondary Containment and Impracticability
Figure 4-6.  Sample secondary containment calculations, for multiple tanks in a containment area.
  The EPA inspector has questioned the adequacy of the secondary containment based on the following scenario and
  wants to verify how much precipitation the dike area can hold and compare it to available precipitation data to
  determine if 112% is an adequate design criterion for this facility.

  Scenario:
  A 60 ft x 36 ft concrete dike surrounds one 20,000-gallon horizontal tank (10 ft diameter and 35 ft length) and two
  10,000-gallon vertical tanks (each 10 ft diameter and 15 ft height). The dike walls are 18 inches (1.5 feet) tall. The
  SPCC Plan states that secondary containment is designed to hold  112% of the volume of the largest container.
                                      2 Q 10.000 gallons
  Notes:
  - The factor for converting gallons to cubic feet is 7.48 gallons/ft*.
  - The volume displaced by a cylindrical vertical tank is the tank volume within the containment structure and is equal to
  the tank footprint multiplied by height of the concrete dike. The tank footprint is equal to rrff/4, where D is the tank
  diameter.

  1. Calculate total dike capacity:
          Total capacity of the concrete dike
          = length x width x height = 60 ft x 36 ft x 1.5 ft = 3,240 ft3 = 24,235 gallons

  2. Calculate net dike capacity, considering displacement from other tanks within the dike:
          The total capacity of the concrete dike is reduced by the volume "displaced" by other tanks inside the
          containment structure. The displacement is:
          = number of tanks x footprint x height of dike wall
          = 2 x n(10 ft)1 /4 x 1.5 ft = 235.6 ft3 = 1,762 gallons

          The net dike capacity, i.e., the volume that would be available in the event of a failure of the largest tank
          within the dike, is:
          = Total volume - tank displacement = 24,235 - 1,762 = 22,473 gallons = 3,004 ft3

  3. Calculate the amount of available freeboard provided  by the dike, given the net dike capacity:
          The available freeboard volume is:
          = Net dike capacity - volume of largest tank within the dike
          = 22.473-20,000 = 2,473 gallons = 331 ft3

          This is equivalent, expressed in terms of the capacity of the largest tank, to:
          = Net dike capacity/volume of largest tank within the dike
          = 22,473/20,000 = 112%

          This available freeboard volume provides a freeboard height:
          = Available freeboard volume / dike surface area
          = 331 ft3 / (60 ft x 36 ft) = 0.15 ft ==1.8 in

  Therefore, this dike provides sufficient freeboard for 1.8 inches of precipitation.

  Conclusion:
  The EPA inspector should review the Plan and/or inquire about the precipitation event considered in determining that
  "sufficient freeboard for precipitation" is provided. The adequacy of the secondary containment freeboard is ultimately
  an engineering determination made by the PE and is certified in the Plan. This example serves only as a guide on
  doing the calculations for certain circumstances in  which the inspector has concerns with the  freeboard volume
  associated with the secondary containment design.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency          4-15                          Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
 SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
4.2.5  Role of the EPA Inspector in Evaluating Sufficient Freeboard

       When reviewing an SPCC Plan, the EPA inspector should evaluate whether the size of
secondary containment is adequate to meet the freeboard requirement. When examining the
secondary containment measures for bulk storage containers, mobile or portable oil containers, and
production facility bulk storage containers, the inspector should ensure that the Plan documents
that the secondary containment capacity can hold the entire capacity of the largest single container,
plus sufficient freeboard to contain precipitation. Whatever method is used to calculate the amount
of freeboard that is "sufficient" for the facility and container configuration should be documented in
the Plan.

       To determine whether secondary containment is sufficient, the  EPA inspector may:

             Verify that the Plan specifies the capacity of secondary  containment along with
             supporting documentation, such as calculations for comparing freeboard capacity to
             the volume of precipitation in an expected storm event.
                     If calculations are not included with the Plan, and the inspector suspects the
                     secondary containment is inadequate, the  inspector may request supporting
                     documentation from the owner/operator.1
                     If diked area calculations appear inadequate, review local precipitation data
                     such as data from airports or the National Weather Service,2 as needed.
             Review operating procedures, storage tank design, and/or system controls for
             preventing inadvertent overfilling of oil storage tanks that could affect the available
             capacity of the secondary containment structure.
             Confirm that the secondary containment capacity can reasonably handle the
             contents of the largest tank on an ongoing basis (i.e., including during rain events).
             During the inspection, verify that the containment structures and equipment are
             maintained and that the SPCC Plan is properly implemented.

4.2.6  Passive Versus Active Measures of Secondary Containment

       In some situations, permanent containment structures, such as dikes, may not be feasible
(i.e., for certain electrical equipment). Section 112.7(c) allows for the use of certain types of active
containment measures (countermeasures or spill response capability), which prevent a discharge to
navigable waters or adjoining shorelines.  Active containment measures are those that require
deployment or other specific action by the owner or operator. These measures may be deployed
either before an activity involving the handling of oil starts, or in reaction to a discharge so long  as
the active measure is designed to prevent an oil spill from reaching navigable water or adjoining
         11ndustry guidance recommends that facility owners/operators include any secondary containment capacity
  calculations and/or design standards with the Plan. API Bulletin 016, "Suggested Procedure for Development of Spill
  Prevention Control and Countermeasure Plans," contains example calculations to which inspectors may refer.

         2 National Weather Service, Hydrometeorologica! Design Studies Center, Current Precipitation Frequency
  Publications, available at http://www.nws.noaa.gov/oh/hdsc/currentpf.htmSN2.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
4-16
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
                                        Chapter 4:  Secondary Containment and Impracticability
shorelines. Passive measures are permanent installations and do not require deployment or action
by the owner/operator.

       Active measures (countermeasures) include, but are not limited to:

              Placing a properly designed  storm drain cover over a drain to contain a
              potential spill in an area where a transfer occurs, prior to the transfer activity.
              Storm drains are normally kept uncovered; deployment of the drain cover prior to the
              transfer activity may be an acceptable active measure to prevent a discharge from
              reaching navigable waters or adjoining shorelines through the drainage system.

              Placing a storm drain cover over a drain in reaction to a discharge, before the
              oil reaches the drain. If deployment of a drain cover can reliably be achieved in
              time to prevent a discharge of oil from reaching navigable waters or adjoining
              shorelines, this may be an acceptable active measure. This method may be risky,
              however, and is subject to a good engineering
              judgement on what is realistically and reliably         ^M^^H^^^^^^HM
              achievable, even  under adverse circumstances.         ^ Tjp

              ...      	  .                   ..                 Active — The containment
              Using spill kits in the event of an oil discharge.      measure involves a certain
              The use of spill kits, strategically located and ready     action by facility personnel
              for deployment in the event of an oil discharge, may     %£"•££%££%?•
              be an acceptable active measure, in certain            also referred to as spin
              circumstances, to prevent a spill from reaching         countermeasures.
              navigable waters  or adjoining shorelines. This          Passive - The containment
              method may be risky and is subject to good            measure remains in place
                        '       '                                 regardless of the facility
              engineering judgement, considering the volume most   operations and therefore
              likely expected to be discharged and proximity to       does not reciuire facility
                 .   . .     .       _,. . .     u    i-                  personnel to act.
              navigable waters  or adjoining shorelines.             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
              Use of spill response capability (spill response teams) in the event of an oil
              discharge. This method differs from activating an oil spill contingency plan (such as
              required in §112.7{d)) because the response actions are specifically designed to
              contain an oil discharge prior to reaching navigable waters or adjoining shorelines.
              This may include the emergency construction/deployment of dikes, curbing,
              diversionary structures, ponds, and other temporary containment methods (such as
              sorbent materials) so long as they can be implemented in time to prevent the spilled
              oil from reaching navigable waters or adjoining shorelines. This method may be
              risky and is subject to good engineering judgement.

              Closing a gate valve that controls drainage from an area prior to a discharge.
              If the gate valve is normally kept open, closing it before an activity that may result in
              an oil discharge may be an acceptable active measure to prevent a spill from
              reaching navigable waters or adjoining shorelines.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency         4-17                      Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
       The efficacy of active containment measures to prevent a discharge depends on their
technical effectiveness (e.g., mode of operation, absorption rate), placement and quantity, and
timely deployment prior to or following a discharge. For discharges that occur only during manned
activities, such as those occurring during transfers, an active measure (e.g, sock, mat, other
portable barrier, or land-based response capability) may be appropriate, provided that the measure
is capable of containing the oil discharge volume and rate, and is timely and properly
constructed/deployed.  Ideally, in order to further reduce the potential for a discharge to reach
navigable waters or adjoining shorelines, the active
measure should be deployed  prior to initiating the
activity with potential for a discharge.
          •••Tip
          Land-Based Response Capability is used to
          describe any active measure that is deployed/
          implemented immediately upon discovery of a
          discharge before the discharge reaches
          navigable waters or adjoining shorelines.

          Contingency Plan is used to describe
          measures for controlling, containing, and
          recovering oil that has been discharged into or
          upon navigable waters or adjoining shorelines
          in such quantities as may be harmful.
       For certain active measures, however, such as
the use of "kitty litter" or other loose sorbent material, it
may be impractical to pre-deploy the measure. In such
cases, the sorbent material should be readily available
so that it can immediately be used before the spill can
spread. Portable tanks can be equipped with a spill kit
to be used in the event of a discharge during transfers.
The spill kit should be sized, however, to effectively
contain the volume of oil that could be discharged.  Most commercially available spill kits are
intended for relatively small volumes (up to approximately 150 gallons of oil).  EPA generally
believes that active containment measures can be used to satisfy the general secondary
containment requirement when they are capable of containing the most likely discharge volume.
Elements to consider may include the capacity of the containment measure, effectiveness, and
timely implementation, and the availability of personnel and equipment to implement the active
measure effectively at the facility. For example, a most likely discharge of 600 gallons would
require  deploying more than 900 "high-capacity" sorbent  pads (20 inches by 20 inches) since each
pad absorbs less than 0.7 gallons of oil. The same spill volume would require nine sorbent
blankets, each measuring 38 inches by 144 feet and weighing approximately 40 pounds. The rapid
deployment of such response equipment and material would be difficult to achieve under most
circumstances, particularly if only a few individuals are present when the discharge occurs, or
during adverse conditions (e.g., rainfall, fire).

       The secondary containment approach implemented at a facility need not be "one size fits
all." Different approaches may be taken for the same activity at a given facility, depending  on the
material and location.  For example, the SPCC Plan may specify that drain covers and sorbent
material be pre-deployed prior to transfers of low  viscosity oils in certain areas of a facility located in
close proximity to navigable waters or drainage structures. For other areas and/or other products
(e.g., highly viscous oils), the Ran may specify that sufficient spill response capability (spill
response teams) are available for use in the event of a discharge, so long as personnel and
equipment are available at the facility and these measures can be effectively implemented  in a
timely manner to prevent oil from reaching navigable waters and adjoining shorelines.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
4-18
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
                                       Chapter 4: Secondary Containment and Impracticability
       Additionally, oil-filled operational equipment (e.g., electrical transformers, capacitors,
switches) poses unique challenges, and permanent (passive) containment structures, such as
dikes, may not always be feasible. This type of oil-filled operational equipment is only subject to the
general secondary containment provision, and the owner/operator may use the flexibility of active
containment measures as described above. However, this method of containment may be risky
because it requires the ability to detect a discharge, and these measures must be implemented
effectively and in a timely manner to prevent oil from reaching navigable waters and adjoining
shorelines, as required by §112.7{a)(3){iii) and  (c). The owner/operator may determine that these
methods prove impracticable for a facility with oil-filled operational equipment (e.g., because of
timeliness of a response). When secondary containment is impracticable, the certified SPCC Plan
must document the reasons for impracticability; use a contingency plan in lieu of secondary
containment; and provide a written commitment of manpower, equipment, and materials to
expeditiously control and remove  any quantity of oil discharged that may be harmful (§112.7(d)).

       In certain circumstances, sorbents, such as socks, booms, pads, or loose materials, may be
used to complement passive measures. Where berms around transfer areas are open on one side
for access, and where the ground surface slopes  away from the opening and from drains, for
example, sorbent material may be effective in preventing small quantities of oil from escaping the
bermed area in the event of a discharge.

       Active measures are not appropriate for all situations with the potential for an oil discharge.
As noted above,  active measures often have limited absorption or containment capacity.
Additionally, storage tanks, piping, and other containers pose a risk of discharge during off-hour
periods when facility personnel are generally not on-site or are too few in number to detect a
discharge in a timely manner and  deploy the containment measure(s). Pre-deptoyment of active
measures in a "fixed" configuration may be problematic since sorbent materials  or portable barriers
are typically not engineered for long-term deployment, and their performance may be affected by
precipitation, ultraviolet light degradation, or cold temperature. Moreover, in some cases, the
deployment of an active measure  can  interfere  with other systems; for example, by impeding the
proper operation of drainage structures (e.g., drain cover). For these reasons, EPA generally
believes that dikes/berms, curbing, spill diversion ponds, or other similarly fixed, engineered
structures remain the most effective means of spill control and containment for oil storage
containers.

       The SPCC Plan must describe the procedures used to deploy the active measures, explain
how the use of active measures is appropriate to the situation, and explain the methods for
discharge discovery that will be used to determine when deployment of the active measures is
appropriate (§112.7(a){3)(iii) and (iv)).  It should, for instance, discuss whether active measures will
be put in place before a potential discharge event (e.g., a boom placed around a vehicle before
fueling activities begin) or whether the active measures will be deployed quickly after a spill occurs
as a countermeasure (e.g., sorbents on hand to contain a spill should one occur). EPA also
recommends that the Plan describe the amount of materials available and the location where they
are stored, and the manpower required to adequately deploy the material in a timely fashion. Both
the amount and location of materials should be determined based on good engineering practice,

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency        4-19                     Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
taking into consideration the potential volume of a discharge and the time necessary to deploy the
measure to prevent a discharge to navigable waters or adjoining shorelines.  Some of this
information may already be described in other existing documents at the facility (i.e., BMPs) in
which case, these documents should be referenced in the SPCC Plan and available at the time of
an inspection.

       There is a subtle but important difference between active containment measures
(countermeasures, including land-based response capability) and an oil spill contingency plan as
described in §112.7(d). Active secondary containment (as opposed to permanent or passive
containment structures) requires a deployment action; it is put in place prior to or immediately upon
discovery of an oil discharge. The purpose of these measures is to contain an oil discharge before
it reaches navigable waters or adjoining shorelines; alternatively, a contingency plan, for SPCC
purposes, is a detailed oil spill response plan developed when any form of secondary containment
is determined to be impracticable. A contingency plan addresses controlling, containing,  and
recovering an oil discharge in quantities that may be harmful to navigable waters or adjoining
shorelines.  The purpose of a contingency plan should be both to outline response capability or
countermeasures to limit the quantity of a discharge reaching navigable waters or adjoining
shorelines (if possible), and to address response to a discharge of oil that has reached navigable
waters or adjoining shorelines.

       Evaluating the ability of active secondary containment measures deployed after a discharge
to prevent oil from reaching navigable waters and adjoining shorelines involves considering the time
it would take to discover the discharge,  the time for the discharge to reach navigable waters or
adjoining shorelines, and the time necessary to deploy the active secondary containment measure.
For some active containment measures such as the use of sorbent materials, the amount of oil the
secondary containment measure can effectively contain, including the potential impact of
precipitation on sorption capacity, is a critical factor, EPA would expect good engineering practice
to indicate that active secondary containment measures may be used  to satisfy the general
secondary containment requirements of §112.7(c). Generally, active containment measures may
not be appropriate for satisfying the specific containment requirements for a major container failure.
Furthermore, even when used to comply with §112.7(c), EPA recommends that active measures be
limited to those situations where the PE has determined that the mostly likely discharge is a small
volume.
4.2.7  Role of the EPA Inspector in Evaluating the Use of Active Measures of Secondary
       Containment

       Inspectors should carefully evaluate the use of active measures and determine if the
equipment and personnel are available for deployment of this secondary containment method. The
EPA inspector should inspect the facility to determine whether the active measures are appropriate
for the facility - i.e., the inspector should note whether material storage locations are reasonable
given the time necessary to deploy measures, and whether the amount of available materials is
sufficient to handle the anticipated discharge volume.  In addition, the inspector should document
whether the facility is keeping the necessary records.
US. Environmental Protection Agency
4-20
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
                                        Chapter 4:  Secondary Containment and Impracticability
       Upon inspection, a facility owner/operator should be able to demonstrate that facility
personnel are able to carry out the deployment procedure as written. The EPA inspector should
verify that the facility's SPCC Plan contains the following items, and that items in the Plan are
observed in the field and/or verified through discussions with facility personnel. Questions for the
EPA inspector to consider in determining the adequacy of active measures are also provided below.

             Explanation showing why the use of active measures is appropriate.
                    What is the PE-determined expected/most likely potential discharge volume,
                    and is the active measure appropriately sized to contain the spill?
                    What is the discharge detection method and is it appropriate?
                    How much time is required to deploy the selected active measure?
                    Given these factors, is the active  measure a reasonable approach?

       •      Detailed description of deployment procedures.
                    Will active measures be put in place before a potential discharge event or
                    after a spill occurs?
                    If measures are to  be activated after a spill occurs, does the Plan describe
                    the method of discharge detection?
                    Are the  equipment and personnel available to deploy/implement the proposed
                    active containment measure  in an effective/timely manner to prevent oil from
                    reaching navigable waters or adjoining shorelines?
                    Does the Plan identify drainage pathways and the appropriate deployment
                    location for the active measures?

       •      Description of all necessary materials and the location where they are stored (i.e.,
             location of drain covers, spill kits, or other spill response equipment).
                    In cases where spill kits or sorbent materials are to be used, does the Plan
                    describe the amount of materials available?
                    Are inventory and/or maintenance logs provided to ensure that spill response
                    equipment/materials are currently in good working condition (i.e., not
                    damaged, expired, or used up)?
             -     Are the  equipment/materials  located such that personnel can realistically get
                    to the equipment and deploy it quickly enough to prevent a discharge to
                    navigable waters or adjoining shorelines? That is, are the material and
                    equipment accessible (not locked, key is available), and are they located
                    close enough to the potential source of discharge?

       *      Description of facility staff responsible for deploying active measures.
             -     Are training records up to date?
                    Have the personnel involved in activities for which the  active measures might
                    be deployed been trained (i.e.,  in location of materials, drainage conditions)?
                    Is there sufficiently trained facility staff present at all times to effectively
                    deploy the  measures in the event of a discharge?
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
4-21
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
4.2.8  "Sufficiently Impervious"

       Section 112. 7(c) states that the entire secondary containment system, "including walls and
floor, must be capable of containing oil and must be constructed so that any discharge from a
primary containment system ... wilt not escape containment before cleanup occurs." With respect to
bulk storage containers at onshore facilities (except production facilities), §§1 12.8(c)(2) and
112.12(c)(2) state that diked areas must be "sufficiently impervious to contain oil."  The purpose of
the secondary containment requirement is to prevent discharges as described in §112. 1(b);
therefore, effective secondary containment methods must be able to contain oil until the oil is
cleaned up.  EPA does not specify permeability or retention time performance criteria for these
provisions. Instead, EPA gives the owner/operator and the certifying PE flexibility in determining
how best to design the containment system to prevent a discharge as described in §1 12.1(b). This
determination is based on a good engineering practice evaluation  of the facility configuration,
product properties, and other site-specific conditions.  For example, EPA believes that a sufficiently
impervious retaining wall, or dike/berm, including the walls and floors, must be constructed so that
any discharge from a primary containment system will not escape  the secondary containment
system before cleanup occurs and before the discharge reaches navigable waters and adjoining
shorelines (§§1 12.7(c), 1 12.8(c)(2) and 1 12.12(c}(2)).  Ultimately,  the determination of
imperviousness should be verified by the certifying PE.

       The preamble to the 2002 SPCC rule states that "a complete description of how secondary
containment is designed, implemented, and maintained to meet the standard of sufficiently
impervious is necessary" (67 FR 47102). Therefore, pursuant to §112.7(a)(3)(iii) and (c), the Plan
should address how the secondary containment is designed to effectively contain oil until it is
cleaned up.  Control and/or removal of vegetation  may be necessary to maintain the
imperviousness of the secondary containment and to allow for the visual detection of discharges.
The owner or operator should  monitor the conditions of the secondary containment structure to
ensure that it remains impervious to oil. Repairs of excavations or other penetrations through
secondary containment need to be conducted in accordance with  good engineering practice.

       The earthen floor of a secondary containment system may be considered "capable of
containing oil"  until cleanup occurs, or "sufficiently impervious" under §§112.7(c), 112.8(c)(2), and
112.12(c)(2), respectively, if there is no subsurface conduit to navigable waters allowing the oil to
reach navigable waters before it is cleaned up. Should oil reach navigable waters or adjoining
shorelines, it is a reportable discharge under 40 CFR part 1 10.  The suitability of earthen material
for secondary containment systems may depend on the properties of both the product stored and
the soil. For example, compacted local soil may be suitable to contain a viscous product, such as
liquid asphalt cement, but may not be suitable to contain gasoline. Permeability through the wall (or
wall-to-floor interface) of the structure may result in an immediate  discharge as described in
       In certain geographic locations the native soil (e.g., clay) may be determined as sufficiently
impervious by the PE. However, there are many more instances where good engineering practice
would generally not allow the use of a facility's native soil alone as secondary containment because
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
4-22
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
                                        Chapter 4:  Secondary Containment and Impracticability
the soil is not homogenous. In fact, certain state requirements may restrict the use of soil as a
means of secondary containment, and many state regulations explicitly forbid the discharge of oil
on soil.  Pennsylvania's Storage Tank and Spill Prevention Act, for example, requires that facilities
take immediate steps to prevent injury from any discharge of a substance that has the potential to
flow, be washed or fall into waters, and endanger downstream users.  The Act requires that residual
substances be removed, within 15 days, from the ground or affected waters. Discharges to soil and
groundwater may also violate other federal regulations. In addition, the EPA inspector should
strongly urge facility owners and operators to investigate and comply with all state and local
requirements. An Inspector who notices potential violations under other statutes or regulations
should contact the appropriate authorities for follow-up with the facility.

       In summary, any of the owner/operator's determinations specifying whether secondary
containment structures are capable of containing oil until it is cleaned up ("sufficiently impervious'')
should be made based on good engineering practice and may consider site-specific factors.

4.2.9  Role of the  EPA Inspector in Evaluating "Sufficiently Impervious"

       The EPA inspector should determine whether the facility's secondary containment is
sufficiently impervious, based on  a review of the SPCC Plan and on an observation of site
conditions. The EPA inspector may ask to see any calculations/engineering justifications  used in
determining levels of imperviousness; this information, including calculations, should be maintained
with the Plan to facilitate the inspector's review. To determine whether secondary containment is
sufficiently impervious, the inspector may consider the following:

              Whether the SPCC Plan describes how secondary containment is designed,
              implemented, and maintained. The certification of the Plan's adequacy is the
              responsibility of the PE and a determination of sufficient imperviousness may be
              based strictly on geotechnical knowledge of soil classification and best engineering
              judgment.  The inspector may also review records of hydraulic conductivity tests, if
              such tests were conducted to ascertain the imperviousness of the secondary
              containment structure. The inspector may also review drainage records that are
              required to be kept by the facility owner/operator in accordance with §112.8(c)(3),
              §112.9(b)(1), or §112.12(c)(3).  If, for example, facility personnel never drain the
              outdoor containment, then the inspector may pose follow-up questions to clarify how
              the facility  removes precipitation after heavy rainfall, since lack of rainfall
              accumulation could indicate that the water is escaping the containment structure
              through the walls or floor.

              For bulk storage facilities (excluding production) subject to §112.8 or §112.12,
              procedures on  how the facility minimizes and evaluates the potential for corrosion of
              container bottoms/bases that cannot be visually inspected.  Corrosion of container
              bottom is addressed in part by integrity testing of bulk storage containers under
              §112.8(c)(6) or §112.12(c)(6).  If a facility owner/operator canoot certify that the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency         4-23                      Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
             material under the container is sufficiently impervious (whether earthen or
             manmade), the inspector should consider:
             -      Whether the inspection and integrity testing program in the Plan includes an
                    internal inspection in the scope of the container integrity testing program in
                    accordance with industry standards. This internal inspection should include
                    the bottom plate. Since the bottom plate cannot be examined from the
                    underside, the only inspection available is to assess the fitness of the bottom
                    plate via an internal inspection.  (See Chapter 7 of this document for more
                    information on integrity testing.)
                    Whether the facility has the ability to detect oil discharges from a container
                    bottom in order to commence cleanup before a discharge escapes the
                    containment systems.

             Evidence of stained soil or stressed vegetation outside the containment area as well
             as at nearby outfalls or other areas affected by runoff from the secondary
             containment structure. For example, at onshore production facilities, there may be
             oil stains or white areas and white salt crystal deposits on the outside of berm walls
             and on the ground surface farther away from the berm. These deposits may indicate
             that produced water has flowed through the secondary containment and that the
             structure may not be sufficiently impervious.

       *      How the secondary containment is constructed (materials and method of
             construction). Look for the type of soil (if soil is used).  Floor and walls constructed
             of sandy material, for example, may not be appropriate to hold refined products such
             as gasoline.  If earthen material is used, EPA recommends that it have a high clay
             content and be properly compacted, not simply formed into a mound.  Untreated
             cinder blocks used for containment should be closely evaluated by an inspector due
             to their porous nature.

             If a facility considers the earthen floor of a secondary containment system to be
             sufficiently impervious, the inspector should consider any underground pathway that
             could lead to navigable waters.

4.2.10 Facility Drainage (Onshore Facilities)

       Control of Drainage from Dikes and Berms

       When containment methods such as dikes and berms are used to satisfy the secondary
containment requirements of the rule such as §§112.7(c) and 112.8(c)(2), the specific facility
drainage requirements also  apply.  The specific requirements for diked areas at onshore facilities
(except production) are found in §§112.8(b)(1), 112.8(b)(2), 112.12(b)(1), and 112.12(b)(2); for
diked areas at onshore production facilities they are found in §112.9(b)(1). Drainage from diked
storage areas can be accomplished by several means such as valves, manually activated pumps,
or ejectors. If dikes are drained using valves, they must be of manual design to prevent an

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency         4-24                      Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
                                           Chapter 4: Secondary Containment and Impracticability
uncontrolled discharge outside of the dike, such as into a facility drainage system or effluent
treatment system, except where facility systems are designed to control such a discharge
(§§112.8(b)(1) and 112.12(b)(1)). At oil production facilities, drains on secondary containment
systems (both dikes and other equivalent measures required under §112.7(c)(1)) must be closed
and sealed at all times,  except when draining uncontaminated rainwater (§112.9(b)(1)). Although
not required by the rule, owners and operators should strongly consider locking valves controlling
dike or remote impoundment areas, especially when they can be accessed by non-facility
personnel.
       For diked areas serving as
secondary containment for bulk
storage containers, §§1 12.8(c)(3)
and 1 12.12(c)(3) require that storm
water accumulations be inspected
for the presence of oil and records
of the drainage events must be
maintained.  Section 112. 9(b)(1)
requires that oil production facilities
comply with the same drainage
procedures for diked areas as other
types of onshore facilities under
§112.8(c){3)(ii) through (iv). EPA
inspectors should evaluate facility
records to verify compliance with the
drainage procedures described in
§1 12.8(c)(3).  Any storm  water
discharge records maintained at the
facility in accordance with the
NPDES  rules in §122.41(j)(2) or
1 22.41 (m)(3) are acceptable under
§§112.8(c)(3)(iv) and
§§112.8(b) and 112.12(b) Facility drainage.
(1) Restrain drainage from diked storage areas by valves to prevent
a discharge into the drainage system or facility effluent treatment
system, except where facility systems are designed to control such
discharge. You may empty diked areas by pumps or ejectors;
however, you must manually activate these pumps or ejectors and
must inspect the condition of the accumulation before starting, to
ensure no oil will be discharged.
(2) Use valves of manual, open-and-closed design, for the drainage
of diked areas. You may not use flapper-type drain valves to drain
diked areas. If your facility drainage drains directly into a
watercourse and not into an on-site wastewater treatment plant, you
must inspect and may drain uncontaminated retained stormwater, as
provided in paragraphs (c)(3)(ii), (iii), and (iv) of this section.
(3) Design facility drainage systems from undiked areas with a
potential for a discharge (such as where piping is located outside
containment walls or where tank truck discharges may occur outside
the loading area) to flow into ponds, lagoons, or catchment basins
designed to retain oil or return it to the facility. You must not locate
catchment basins in areas subject to periodic flooding.
(4) If facility drainage is not engineered as in paragraph (b)(3) of this
section, equip the final discharge of all ditches inside the facility with
a diversion system that would, in the event of an uncontrolled
discharge, retain oil in the facility.
(5) Where drainage waters are treated in more than one treatment
unit and such treatment is continuous, and pump transfer is needed,
provide two "lift" pumps and permanently install at least one of the
pumps. Whatever techniques you use, you must engineer facility
drainage systems to prevent a discharge as described in §112.1 (b) in
case there is an equipment failure or human error at the facility.

Note: The above text is an excerpt of the SPCC rule. Refer to 40 CFR part
112 for the full text of the rule.
       Facility Drainage Control
       When secondary containment requirements are addressed through facility drainage
controls, the requirements in §112.8(b)(3) and (4), or §112.12(b)(3) and (4) apply. For example, a
facility may choose to use the existing storm drainage system to meet secondary containment
requirements by channeling discharged oil to a remote containment area to prevent a discharge as
described in §112.1 (b). The facility drainage system must be designed to  flow into ponds, lagoons,
or catchment basins designed to retain oil or return it to the facility.  Catchment basins must not be
located in areas subject to periodic flooding {§§112.8(b)(3) and 112.12(b)(3)).
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
       4-25
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
       A facility does not have to address the undiked area requirements of §112.8(b)(3) and (4) or
§112.12(b)(3) and (4) if the facility does not use drainage systems to meet one of the secondary
containment requirements in the SPCC rule. For example, if the SPCC Plan documents the use of
an active containment measure (such as a combination of sorbents and a spilt mat), which is
effective to prevent a discharge as described in §112.1 (b), then secondary containment has been
provided and it is not necessary to alter drainage systems at the facility.  The facility drainage
system design requirements in §112.8{b)(3) and (4) or §112.12(b)(3) and (4) apply only when the
facility uses these drainage systems to comply with the secondary containment provisions of the
rule such as §§112.7(c) and 112.8(c)(2).

       The EPA inspector should  determine if the facility's documentation in the  Plan identifies
whether the final ponds, lagoons, or catchment basins are designed/sized to meet the appropriate
general and/or specific secondary containment requirements. The following examples help to
illustrate how to determine the appropriate size of the ponds, lagoons, or catchment basins:

*       General Secondary Containment. A facility owner/operator may use a storm water
       drainage system that flows to a containment pond to address the general containment
       requirements of §112.7(c) for a piece of operational equipment (including electrical oil-filled
       equipment). The pond/drainage system should be designed to contain the volume of oil
       likely to be discharged as determined according to good engineering practice and
       documented in the SPCC Plan.  The capacity of the secondary containment required is that
       which is necessary to meet the general containment requirement based on a likely
       discharge (not necessarily  a major container failure).

*       Specific Secondary Containment If a facility owner/operator uses a storm water drainage
       system that flows to a catchment basin to comply with the specific containment
       requirements of §112.8(c)(2) for a bulk storage container, the pond/drainage system must
       be designed to contain the capacity of the largest bulk storage container (with appropriate
       freeboard for precipitation) as dictated by the rule's requirements. The specific containment
       requirement is based on a  major container failure in which the entire capacity of the
       container is discharged.

       General and Specific Secondary Containment.  In a case where a drainage system to a
       final catchment basin is used to meet multiple secondary containment needs for the facility,
       including compliance with both general and specific containment requirements, the system's
       design will need to meet the most stringent rule requirement (typically the specific secondary
       containment requirement).

       The facility drainage requirements of §§112.8(b) and 112,12(b) are design standards for
secondary containment (not additional secondary containment requirements) and are therefore
eligible for deviations that provide  equivalent environmental protection in compliance with
§112.7(a}(2) and as determined appropriate by a PE.  Chapter 3 of this guidance document,
Environmental Equivalence, includes a further discussion on ways to evaluate whether facility
US. Environmental Protection Agency
4-26
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
                                         Chapter 4:  Secondary Containment and Impracticability
drainage systems that deviate from the specified design standards are "environmentally equivalent"
and comply with §112.7(a)(2).

4.2.11 Role of the EPA Inspector in Evaluating Onshore Facility Drainage

       The EPA inspector should review the facility's SPCC Plan to ensure that the drainage
procedures are documented and records are maintained. The inspector should also examine the
facility to determine whether the drainage procedures are implemented as described in the SPCC
Plan and whether they are appropriate for the facility.  If a facility uses drainage systems to meet
one or more secondary containment requirements, the inspector should evaluate whether the final
ponds, lagoons, or catchment basins are designed/sized in accordance with the appropriate general
and/or specific secondary containment requirements.  The inspector should also evaluate the
facility records to verify compliance with the drainage procedures described in §112.8(c)(3).

4.3   Overview of the  Impracticability Determination Provision
       EPA recognizes that, although engineered
passive containment systems (such as dikes and
drainage systems) or active secondary
containment approaches are preferable, they may
not always be practicable,  if a facility
owner/operator finds that containment methods
are "impracticable," alternative modes of
protection to prevent and contain oil discharges
are available.  The impracticability provision found
in §112.7(d) allows facility owners/operators to
substitute a combination of other measures in
place of secondary containment: (1) periodic
integrity testing of bulk storage containers and
periodic integrity testing and leak testing of the
valves and piping associated with the containers;
(2) unless they have submitted a Facility
Response Plan (FRP) under §112.20, an oil spill
contingency plan; and (3) a written commitment of
manpower, equipment, and materials required to
control and remove any quantity of oil discharged that
      §112.7(d)
      If you determine that the installation of any of the
      structures or pieces of equipment listed in
      paragraphs (c) and (h)(1) of this section, and
      §§112.8(c)(2). 112.8(c)(11), 112.9(c)(2), 112.10(c),
      112.12(c)(2),  112.12(c)(11), 112.13(c){2), and
      112.14{c) to prevent a discharge as described in
      §112.1 (b) from any onshore or offshore facility is
      not practicable, you must clearly explain in your
      Plan why such measures are not practicable; for
      bulk storage containers, conduct both periodic
      integrity testing of the containers and periodic
      integrity and leak testing of the valves and piping;
      and, unless you have submitted a response plan
      under §112.20, provide in your Plan the following:
      (1) An oil spill contingency plan following the
      provisions of part 109 of this chapter.
      (2) A written commitment of manpower, equipment,
      and materials required to expeditiously control and
      remove any quantity of oil discharged that may be
      harmful.

      Note: The above text is an excerpt of the SPCC rule.
      Refer to 40 CFR part 112 for the full text of the rule.
      may be harmful.
       if an impracticability determination is made, the SPCC Plan must clearly describe why
secondary containment measures are impracticable and how the specified additional measures are
implemented (§112.7(d)).  See Section 4.5 of this chapter for more information on the additional
measures. The option of determining impracticability assumes that it is feasible to effectively and
reliably implement a contingency plan. Facilities should be aware that an  impracticability
determination may affect the applicability of the FRP requirements under 40 CFR part 112subpart
D. In addition, an impracticability determination may affect the calculation of the worst case
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
4-27
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
discharge volume, which may impact the amount of resources required to respond to a worst case
discharge scenario.

4.3.1   Meaning of "Impracticable"

       The impracticability determination is intended to be used when a facility owner/operator is
incapable of installing secondary containment by any reasonable method. Considerations include
space and geographical limitations, local zoning ordinances, fire codes, safety, or other good
engineering practice reasons that would not allow for secondary containment (67 FR 47104). EPA
clarified in a Federal Register notice that economic cost may be considered as one element in a
decision on alternative methods, consistent with good engineering practice for the facility, but may
not be the only determining factor in claiming impracticability (see text box below).
 Notice Concerning Certain Issues Pertaining to the July 2002 Spill Prevention, Control,
 and Countermeasure (SPCC) Rule

        "The Agency did not intend with [preamble language at 67 FR 47104] to opine broadly on the
 role of costs in determinations of impracticability.  Instead, the Agency intended to make the narrower
 point that secondary containment may not be considered impracticable solely because a contingency
 plan is cheaper. (This was the concern that was presented by the commenter to whom the Agency was
 responding.) ...

        In addition, with respect to the emphasized language enumerating considerations for
 determinations of impracticability, the Agency did not intend to foreclose the consideration of other
 pertinent factors. In fact, in the response-to-comment document for the SPCC amendments
 rulemaking, the Agency stated that"... for certain facilities, secondary containment may not be
 practicable because of geographic limitations, local zoning ordinances, fire prevention standards, or
 other good engineering practice reasons."

 The above text is an excerpt from 69 FR 29728 (May 25, 2004).
4.4   Selected Issues  Related to Secondary Containment and
       Impracticability Determinations

       Section 112.7(d) lists the provisions of the SPCC rule for which facility owners or operators
may determine impracticability. Issues related to the use of impracticability determinations for
selected secondary containment requirements are discussed below. Requirements under each
provision are summarized below, atong with a discussion of selected issues. Only secondary
containment requirements can be determined to be impracticable; for most other technical
requirements, the rule provides flexibility to facility  owners or operators to implement alternative
measures that provide equivalent environmental protection (see Chapter 3 of this guidance
document for more information on the environmental equivalence provision).
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
4-28
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
                                       Chapter 4:  Secondary Containment and Impracticability
4.4,1   General Secondary Containment Requirements, §112.7(c)

       The secondary containment requirements found in §112.7(c) apply to any area within a
regulated facility where a discharge may occur. Piping, flowlines, non-bulk containers such as oil-
filled operational equipment and manufacturing equipment, and non-rack transfer areas are subject
to the general secondary containment requirements. A discussion of issues related to secondary
containment for piping and flowlines, transfer areas, and certain oil-filled equipment follows.

       Piping and Flowlines

       Examination of discharge reports from the Emergency Response Notification System
(ERNS) shows that discharges from valves, piping, flowlines, and appurtenances are much more
common than catastrophic tank failure or discharges from tanks (67 FR 47124). To prevent a
discharge as described in §112.1(b), all piping, including buried piping and flowlines, at regulated
facilities must comply with the general secondary containment requirements contained in §112.7(c).

       In certain cases, secondary containment for piping will be possible. Section 112.7(c)
provides flexibility in the method of secondary containment: active measures including land-based
response capability, sorbent materials, drainage systems, and other equipment are acceptable.
Section 112.7(c) does not prescribe a specific containment size for piping and flowlines; however,
good engineering  practice prescribes that containment size should be based on the magnitude of a
reasonable discharge scenario, taking into consideration the specific features of the facility and
operation. A determination of adequate secondary containment should consider the reasonably
expected sources, maximum flow rate, duration of a discharge, and detection capability.  The EPA
inspector should ensure that the secondary containment method for piping and flowlines is
documented in the SPCC Plan and that the PE has certified that the method is appropriate for the
facility according to good engineering  practice. If active methods of containment are selected, the
facility personnel should be able to demonstrate that they can effectively deploy these measures to
contain a potential spill before it reaches navigable waters or adjoining shorelines.

       EPA acknowledges that in many cases, secondary containment may not be practicable for
flowlines and gathering lines.  For example, a production facility in a remote area  may have many
miles of flowlines and gathering lines,  around which it would not be practicable to build permanent
containment structures. For instance, it may not be possible to install secondary containment
around flowlines running across a farmer's or rancher's fields  since berms may become severe
erosional features of the fields and can impede access to the fields by farm/ranch tractors and other
equipment. Similarly, it may be impracticable to construct secondary containment around flowlines
that run along a fence line or county road due to space limitations or intrusion into a county's
property or right-of-way.  At unmanned facilities, the use of active secondary containment methods
is not possible because there is limited capability to detect a discharge and deploy active measures
in a timely fashion. If secondary containment is not practicable, facility owners/operators may make
an impracticability determination and comply with the additional regulatory requirements described
in§112.7(d).
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency        4-29                     Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
       The preamble of the 2002 SPCC rule (67 FR 47078) states that the contingency plan
required when secondary containment is not practicable for flowlines and gathering lines should rely
on strong maintenance, corrosion protection, testing, recordkeeping, and inspection procedures to
prevent and quickly detect discharges from such lines.  It should also ensure quick availability and
deployment of response equipment. The integrity testing program for piping and valves should also
be developed in accordance with good engineering practice, in order to prevent a discharge as
described in §112.1 (b).  A flowline maintenance program is required for production facilities under
§112.9(d)(3).  (See Chapter 7 of this document for a summary of the recommended key elements of
a flowline maintenance program.) It is especially important that facility owners or operators who
determine that secondary containment is impracticable implement a comprehensive flowline
maintenance program. If an impracticability determination is made for flowlines or gathering lines,
EPA inspectors should extensively and carefully review the adequacy of the flowline maintenance
program. According to practices recommended by industry groups such as API, a comprehensive
piping program should include the following elements:

       •      Prevention measures that avert the discharge of fluids from primary containment;
       •      Detection measures that identify a discharge or potential for a discharge;
             Protection measures that minimize the  impact of a discharge; and
       •      Remediation measures that mitigate discharge impacts by relying on limited or
             expedited cleanup.

       In order for a contingency plan to be effective, it is essential for discharges to be detected in
a timely manner. Good engineering practice may require that unmanned facilities where secondary
containment is impracticable be inspected more frequently than would be required at a typical
unmanned facility where secondary containment is provided. For facilities that do not have a
Facility Response Plan (FRP) pursuant to §112.20, if it is not feasible to effectively and reliably
implement a contingency plan, owners/operators must determine how to comply with the applicable
secondary containment requirements in §112.7(c). A contingency plan or FRP is required when a
determination of impracticability is made, pursuant to §112.7(d).

       Transfer Areas
       A transfer operation is one in which oil is moved from or into some form of transportation,
storage, equipment, or other device, into or from some other or similar form of transportation, such
as a pipeline, truck, tank car, or other storage, equipment, or device (67 FR 47130). Areas where
oil is transferred but no loading or unloading rack is present are subject to §112.7(c), and thus
appropriate containment and/or diversionary structures are required. EPA does not require
specifically sized containment for transfer areas; however, containment size must be based on
good engineering practice (§112.3(d)).

       The containment requirement at §112.7(c) applies to both loading and unloading areas.
Examples of activities that occur within transfer areas include:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
4-30
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
                                       Chapter 4:  Secondary Containment and Impracticability
             Unloading oil from a truck to a heating oil tank;
       •      Loading oil into a vehicle from a dispenser; and
       •      Transferring crude oil from an oil production tank battery into tank trucks.

       Secondary containment size should be based on the magnitude of a most likely discharge,
taking into consideration the specific features of the facility and operation.  Specific features of
different loading/unloading operations include the hardware, procedures, and personnel who are
able to take action to limit the volume of a discharge. EPA recommends that a determination of
adequate secondary containment consider:

             The reasonably expected sources and causes of a discharge.  This could be a
             failed hose connection; failed valve; overfill of a container, tank truck, or railroad tank
             car; or breach of a container.  Determination would be based on the type of transfer
             operation, facility experience and spill history, potential for human error, etc.
       *      The reasonably expected maximum rate of discharge.  This will be dependent on
             the mode of failure.  It may be equal to the maximum rate of transfer or the leakage
             rate from a breached container.
             The ability to detect and react to the discharge. This will be dependent on the
             availability  of monitoring  instrumentation for prompt detection of a discharge and/or
             the proximity of personnel to detect and respond to the discharge.
             The reasonably expected duration of the discharge.  This will be dependent on
             the availability of manual or automatic isolation valves, the proximity of qualified
             personnel to the operation, and other factors that may limit the volume of a
             discharge.
             The time it would take a discharge to impact navigable waters or adjoining
             shorelines. This could depend on the proximity to waterways and  storm drains, and
             the slope of the ground surface between the loading area and the waterway or drain.

       An example calculation of secondary containment size, based on these considerations, is
provided in Figure 4-7.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
4-31
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
Figure 4-7. Sample calculation of appropriate secondary containment capacity at a transfer area.
  Scenario:
  A fuel truck is loading oil into a heating oil tank at a regulated facility, with an attendant present throughout the
  operation.

  Details:
        •      The truck is loading at a rate of 150 gallons per minute.
        *      The reasonably expected source and cause of a discharge is a ruptured hose connection.
        •      A shutoff valve is present on the loading line and is accessible to trie attendant
        •      An evaluation determines that the discharge will not impede the attendant's access to the shutoff
               valve and that he can safely close the valve within 10 seconds of the hose connection rupture,
               based on past experience under similar circumstances; 15 seconds is assumed to be a conservative
               estimate of the response time.

  Calculations:
  The maximum reasonably expected discharge would be calculated to be 150 gallons:
                         [(150 gal/min) x (1 min/60 sec) x (15 sec)] = 37.5 gallons

  Conclusion:
  Secondary containment volume should be at least 37.5 gallons. A larger volume for secondary containment would be
  needed if time required to  safely close the shutoff valve takes longer than 10 seconds.
       A number of other factors may also affect the appropriate volume for secondary containment
at loading and unloading areas.  These factors include a variable rate of transfer; the ability to
control a discharge from a breached container, if such a breach is reasonably expected to occur;
the availability of personnel in close proximity to the operations and the necessary time to respond;
the presence or absence of monitoring instrumentation to detect a discharge; the type and location
of valving that may affect the probable time needed to stop the discharge; and the presence or
absence of automatic valve actuators.  These are a few examples of the factors that a PE may
consider when reviewing the  adequacy of secondary containment systems at a facility. The EPA
inspector may consider the same factors when assessing the adequacy of secondary containment.

       Secondary containment structures, such as dikes or berms, may not be appropriate in areas
where vehicles continuously need access; however, curbing, drainage systems, active measures,
or a combination of these systems can adequately fulfill the secondary containment requirements of
§112.7(c).  A facility owner or operator may implement methods for secondary containment other
than dikes or berms.  For example, a transfer truck loading area at an onshore oil production facility
may be designed to drain discharges away to a topographically lower area using a crescent or
eyebrow-shaped berm. EPA acknowledges that in certain situations, secondary containment at
transfer areas may be impracticable due to geographic limitations,  fire codes,  etc.  In these cases,
owners/operators may determine that secondary containment is impracticable under §112.7{d), and
must clearly explain the reasons why secondary  containment is not practicable and comply with the
additional regulatory requirements.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
4-32
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
                                         Chapter 4:  Secondary Containment and Impracticability
       Oil-Filled Equipment

       Secondary containment may be impracticable for oil-filled equipment (e.g., vaulted
transformers, hydraulic units associated with an elevators/lifts, pad-mounted transformers at
customer sites, and oil-filled cable systems) that are not readily accessible or cross properties
belonging to different owners.  In these cases, the SPCC Plan must clearly explain the reasons why
secondary containment is not practicable and comply with the additional regulatory requirements
under §112.7(d). For more information on oil-filled operational equipment, refer to Section 2.8.2 of
this guidance document.

4.4.2  Secondary Containment Requirements for Loading/Unloading Racks, §112.7(h)(1)
       Section 112.7(h) applies to areas at regulated
facilities where traditional loading/unloading racks for
tank cars and tank trucks are located. Loading and
unloading racks are subject to the specific secondary
containment requirements in §112.7(h)(1).

       EPA inspectors should evaluate compliance
with the requirements of §112.7(h) for equipment
traditionally considered to be "loading racks."  While
the SPCC rule does not provide a definition for the
term "rack," the type of equipment for which these
requirements would typically apply has the following
characteristics:
           §112.7(h)
           Facility tank car and tank truck
           loading/unloading rack (excluding
           offshore facilities).
           (1) Where loading/unloading area
           drainage does not flow into a catchment
           basin or treatment facility designed to
           handle discharges, use a quick drainage
           system for tank car or tank truck loading
           and unloading areas.  You must design
           any containment system to hold at least
           the maximum capacity of any single
           compartment of a tank car or tank truck
           loaded or unloaded at the facility.

           Mote: The above text is an excerpt of the
           SPCC rule. Refer to 40 CFR part 112 for the
           full text of the rule.
       •      The equipment is a permanent structure
              for loading or unloading a tank truck or tank car that is located at a regulated facility.
              The equipment may be comprised of piping assemblages, valves, loading arms,
              pumps, or a similar combination of devices.
              The system is necessary to load or unload tank trucks or tank cars.
              The system may also include shut-off devices and overfill sensors.

       EPA clarified that the provisions of §112.7(h) apply only in instances where a rack structure
is present. (See text box below.)

       Loading racks can be located at any type of facility; however, the loading areas associated
with a production tank battery generally do not have the equipment described above, which is often
associated with a "loading rack."  Loading/unloading areas utilizing a single hose and connection or
standpipe are not considered "racks."
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
4-33
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
  Notice Concerning Certain Issues Pertaining to the July 2002 Spill Prevention, Control,
  and Countermeasure (SPCC) Rule

         "[W]e interpret §112.7(h) only to apply to loading and unloading 'racks.' Under this interpretation,
  if a facility does not have a loading or unloading 'rack,' §112.7(h) does not apply. Thus, in stating that
  section 112.7(h) applies to 'all facilities, including production facilities,'the  Agency only meant that the
  provision applies /fa 'facility' happens to have a loading or unloading  rack  present. The Agency did not
  mean to imply that any particular category of facilities, such as production facilities, are likely to have
  loading or unloading racks present."

  The above text is an excerpt from 69 PR 29728 (May 25, 2004).
       Where drainage from the areas surrounding a loading/unloading rack does not flow into a
catchment basin or treatment facility designed to handle discharges, facility owners and operators
must use a quick drainage system (§112.7{h)(1)). A "quick drainage system" is a device that drains
oil away from the loading/unloading area to some means of secondary containment or returns the
oil to the facility. Section 112.7(h)(1)  requires a sized secondary containment system: the
containment must hold at least the maximum capacity of any single compartment of a tank car or
tank truck loaded or unloaded at the facility.

       Loading and unloading  activities that take place beyond the rack area are not subject to the
requirements of §112.7(h), but are subject, where applicable, to the general containment
requirements of §112.7(c). For more information on these requirements, see Section 4.4.1,
Transfer Areas.
  Letter to Petroleum Marketers Association of America

         "[T]he Agency does not interpret §112.7{h) to apply beyond activities and/or equipment associated
  with tank car and tank truck loading/unloading racks. Therefore, loading and unloading activities that take
  place beyond the rack area would not be subject to the requirements of 40 CFR §112.7{h} (but, of course,
  would be subject, where applicable, to the general containment requirements of 40 CFR §112.7(c))."

  The above text is an excerpt from a letter to Daniel Gilligan, President, Petroleum Marketers Association of America, from Marianne
  Lament Horinko, Assistant Administrator, EPA, May 25, 2004. Found at www.epa.gov/oilspill/pdfs/PMAAJetter.pdf.
       Figures 4-8 and 4-9 illustrate how SPCC secondary containment requirements apply at two
facilities with loading/unloading areas and with equipment that may be considered
loading/unloading racks. In Figure 4-8, the facility has two separate and distinct areas for transfer
activities. One is a tank truck unloading area and the other contains a tank truck loading rack.  The
unloading area contains no rack structure, so the secondary containment requirements of §112.7(c)
apply. The requirements of §112.7(h)(1) apply to the area surrounding the loading rack.  It should
be noted that the presence of a loading rack at one location of a facility does not subject other
loading or unloading areas in a separate part of the facility to the requirements of §112.7(h).
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
4-34
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
                                       Chapter 4: Secondary Containment and Impracticability
       In Figure 4-9, the tank truck loading rack and unloading area are co-located.  In this
situation, the more stringent provision applies; the area is subject to the sized secondary
containment requirements of §112.7(h)(1),

       EPA acknowledges that in certain situations, the sized secondary containment requirements
of §112.7(h)(1) at loading/unloading racks may be impracticable due to geographic limitations, fire
codes, etc. In these cases, the owner or operator may determine that secondary containment is
impracticable as provided in §112.7(d).  Under that provision, the SPCC Plan must clearly explain
the reasons why secondary containment is not practicable, and comply with the additional
regulatory requirements.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency        4-35                     Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
 Figure 4-8. Facility with separate unloading area and loading rack. The tank truck unloading area is
 subject to §112.7(c). The tank truck loading rack is subject to §112.7(h)(1).
   m
            Neverspill OH & Products Corporation       ;ii ,"

           .^^"^'..^^L^'*™.	!	"!";.^'c!	/
                                      
-------
                                          Chapter 4:  Secondary Containment and Impracticability
 Figure 4-9. Facility with co-located unloading area and loading rack.  This containment area is

 designed to meet the more stringent §112.7(h){1) provision.	


                                                                                   _p	;	

                                  ^4,—L
                 /  f>H*: 1  \   / 1>* t \
                 :  *W.;'.-x  \   : x-.-.X'>'>*  (
                 ^ '"^i-r-x- "  I   \ :-'I;\--:I-T /. /

                            SV_..x-'



                     '            \
                 / r^:, >>**? *-*« \
                 I I-:',-:*:- O*i  |—-«—^  ;^.; ;<;.;[ («  j


                 CV   V3V
                                ABC Oil, Inc.
                                                                    - x T«*>B.(6f$f*X fun Us ynHnxf noftKotfot -y
                                                    _l
                                                   <^i(->: :S>H-iii.» W'l*!"-1«»" ''Xfcww-t :;--.v
                                                                                   OlAGKAM is SOT TO SCMJf
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
4-37
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
4.4.3  Secondary Containment Requirements for Onshore Bulk Storage Containers,
       §112.8{c)(2)
                                                        §§112.8(c)(2) and 112.12(c)(2)
                                                        Construct all bulk storage container
                                                        installations so that you provide a secondary
                                                        means of containment for the entire capacity
                                                        of the largest single container and sufficient
                                                        freeboard to contain precipitation. You must
                                                        ensure that diked areas are sufficiently
                                                        impervious to contain discharged oil. Dikes,
                                                        containment curbs, and pits are commonly
                                                        employed for this purpose. You may also
                                                        use an alternative system consisting of a
                                                        drainage trench enclosure that must be
                                                        arranged so that any discharge will terminate
                                                        and be safely confined in a facility catchment
                                                        basin or holding pond.

                                                        Note: The above text is an excerpt of the SPCC
                                                        rule. Refer to 40 CFR part 112 for the full text of the
                                                        rule.
       Under the SPCC rule, a bulk storage container
is any container used to store oil with a capacity of 55
gallons or more (§§112.1{d)(5) and 112.2). Bulk
storage containers are used for purposes including, but
not limited to, the storage of oil prior to use, while being
used, or prior to further distribution in commerce. Oil-
filled pieces of electrical, operating, or manufacturing
equipment are not considered bulk storage containers.

       Bulk storage containers at a regulated facility
must comply with the specific secondary containment
requirements of §112.8(c){2). For bulk storage
containers, secondary  containment must hold the entire
capacity of the largest  single container and sufficient
freeboard to contain precipitation.  (For more
information on sufficient freeboard, see the discussion
in Section 4.2.4 of this  chapter.)  Secondary containment is required for all facilities with bulk
storage containers,  large or small, manned or unmanned, and for facilities with bulk storage
containers that also have oil-filled equipment (specific secondary containment requirements do not
apply to oil-filled equipment).
       Section 112.8{c)(2) considers the use of dikes, containment curbs, and pits as secondary
containment methods, or an alternative system consisting of a drainage trench enclosure that must
be arranged so that any discharge will terminate and be safely confined in a facility catchment basin
or holding pond. Dikes contain oil in the immediate vicinity of the storage container.   Remote
impoundment drains discharge to an area located away from the container.  Examples of design
considerations and requirements for these types of containment are set forth in the National Fire
Protection Association (NFPA) 30 Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code.

       The owner or operator may determine that secondary containment is impracticable under
§112.7(d), when he/she, or the PE certifying the  Plan, determines that it is not practicable to  design
a secondary containment system that can hold the capacity of the largest single container plus
sufficient freeboard.  The EPA inspector should verify that the SPCC Plan clearly explains why
secondary containment is not practicable, and that the facility is complying with the additional
regulatory requirements, such as conducting  both periodic integrity testing of the containers and
periodic integrity and leak testing of the valves and piping (§112.7(d)). For further information on
the additional regulatory requirements, see Section 4.5 of this guidance.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                                            4-38
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
                                         Chapter 4:  Secondary Containment and Impracticability
4.4.4  Secondary Containment Requirements for Mobile/Portable Containers, §112.8(c)(11)
                                                              §§112.8(c)(11)and 11
                                                              Position or locate mobile or portable
                                                              oil storage containers to prevent a
                                                              discharge as described in §112.1(b).
                                                              You must furnish a secondary means
                                                              of containment, such as a dike or
                                                              catchment basin, sufficient to contain
                                                              the capacity of the largest single
                                                              compartment or container with
                                                              sufficient freeboard to contain
                                                              precipitation.

                                                              Note: The above text is an excerpt of the
                                                              SPCC rule. Refer to 40 CFR part 112 for
                                                              the full text of the rule.
       Mobile or portable oil storage containers operating
exclusively within the confines of a non-transportation-related
facility with a capacity to store 55 gallons or more of oil are
regulated under the SPCC rule and must comply with the
secondary containment requirements of §112.8(c)(11) (or
§112.12{c)(11) in the case of a facility that stores or handles
animal fats or vegetable oils).

       The 1971 Memorandum of Understanding between
EPA and the Department of Transportation (DOT) states that
"highway vehicles and railroad cars which  are used for the
transport of oil exclusively within the confines of a non-
transportation-related facility and which are not intended to
transport oil in interstate or intrastate commerce" are considered non-transportation-related, and
therefore fall under EPA's regulatory jurisdiction. For example, some oil refinery tank trucks and
fueling trucks dedicated to a particular facility (such as a construction site, military base, or similar
large facility) fall under this category. Other examples of mobile portable containers include, but are
not limited to, 55 gallon drums, skid tanks, totes, and intermodal bulk containers.

       Vehicles used to store oil,  operating as on-site fueling vehicles at locations such as
construction sites, military,  or civilian remote operations support sites, or rail sidings are generally
considered non-transportation-related.  Indicators describing when a vehicle is intended to be used
as a storage tank (and therefore considered  non-transportation-related) include, but are not limited
to:

              The vehicle is  not licensed for on-road use;
              The vehicle is  no longer mobile (i.e., hard-piped or permanently parked);
       •      The vehicle is fueled on-site and  never moves off-site; and
              The vehicle is  parked on a home-base facility and is filled up off-site but then returns
              to the home base to fuel other equipment located exclusively within the home-base
              facility, and only leaves the site to obtain more fuel.

       According to §§112.8(c)(11) and 112.12(c)(11), mobile or portable containers must be
positioned or located to prevent a discharge  to navigable waters as described in §112.1 (b). The
provision requires that the secondary containment be sized to hold the capacity of the largest single
compartment or container with sufficient freeboard to contain precipitation.

       The appropriate containment methods for mobile containers may vary depending on the
activity in which the container is engaged at  a given time. Thus, secondary containment
requirements may be met differently depending  upon the type of operation being performed, as
described in the examples below.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                                            4-39
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional inspectors
       When mobile containers are in a stationary, unattended mode and not under the direct
oversight or control of facility personnel, the requirements of §§112.8(c)(11) and 112.12{c)(11) may
be met through the use of permanent secondary containment methods, such as dikes, curbing,
drainage systems, and catchment basins. In order to comply with this requirement, an
owner/operator may designate an area of the facility in which to locate mobile containers when not
in use; this area must be designed, following good engineering practices, to hold the capacity of the
largest single compartment or container with sufficient freeboard to contain precipitation. The area
designated for mobile equipment must be identified on the facility diagram provided within the
SPCC Plan (§112.7(a)(3)).

       When mobile containers are involved in activities such as normal fuel transfer, on-site
movement, or preparation for such activities in "stand-by" mode, the requirements of §112.8(c)(11)
do not apply because the container is not "positioned" and therefore the less stringent requirements
of §112.7(c) apply. This requirement may be satisfied through the use of drainage systems that
could ultimately control spilled oil. Alternatively, other measures listed in the general secondary
containment provision under §112.7(c) may be used, including active measures such as sorbents,
booms, or response actions that prevent an oil discharge from reaching navigable waters and
adjoining shorelines. In these cases, a member of the facility personnel should (as determined by
good engineering practice) be in physical control and attending to the mobile or portable storage
container. When the mobile refueler is not engaged in one of the activities listed above, it must be
positioned to prevent a  discharge and provided with secondary containment large enough for the
single compartment or container with sufficient freeboard for precipitation (§112.8(c)(11)).

       Mobile containers, such as drums, skids, and totes, must also comply with the requirements
of §112.8(c)(11) or§112.12(c)(11) according to good engineering practice. For these types of
containers, the EPA inspector should verify that the secondary containment methods are
appropriate. For example, an oil-filled drum positioned for use at a construction site must be
equipped with secondary containment sized in accordance with §112.8(c)(11).  The facility owner or
operator may determine that it is impracticable to provide sized secondary containment in
accordance with §112.8(c)(11), when the container is in stationary or unattended mode, or the
general containment of §112.7{c), pursuant to §112.7(d). The SPCC Plan must properly explain
why secondary containment is impracticable, and document the implementation of the additional
regulatory requirements of §112.7(d).
4.4.5  Secondary Containment Requirements for Bulk
       Storage Containers at Production Facilities,
       §112.9(c)(2)

       The secondary containment requirements of
§112.9(c)(2) apply to all tank battery, separation, and treating
facility installations at a regulated production facility. This
specific secondary containment requirement does not apply
to the entire lease area, but only to tanks, vessels, and
                §112.9(c)(2)
                Provide all tank battery, separation,
                and treating facility installations with a
                secondary means of containment for
                the entire capacity of the largest single
                container and sufficient freeboard to
                contain precipitation. You must safely
                confine drainage from undiked areas in
                a catchment basin or holding pond.

                Note: The above text is an excerpt of the
                SPCC rule. Refer to 40CFR part 112 for
                the full text of the rule.
US. Environmental Protection Agency
4-40
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
                                         Chapter 4: Secondary Containment and Impracticability
containers in the tank battery, separation, and treatment areas.

       Section 112.9(c)(2) is a specific secondary containment requirement; the containment
structure or measure must be able to contain the entire capacity of the largest single container and
sufficient freeboard to contain precipitation.  (Refer to Section 4.2.4 of this chapter for more
information on calculating sufficient freeboard.)  Additionally, pursuant to §112.9(c)(2), if facility
drainage is used as a method of secondary containment for bulk storage containers, drainage from
undiked areas must be safely confined in a catchment basin or holding ponds.  Secondary
containment should be sufficiently impervious to contain oil; refer to Section 4.2.8 of this chapter for
more information.  The undiked drainage requirements of §112.9(c)(2) do not apply to other areas
of the facility or lease, such as truck transfer or wellhead or flow/line areas because they are not
bulk storage containers.  According to the 2002 rule preamble, "the [secondary containment]
requirement applies to oil leases of any size.  Secondary containment is not required for the entire
leased area, merely for the contents of the largest single container in the tank battery, separation,
and treating facility installation, with sufficient freeboard to contain precipitation." (67 FR 47128).

       The facility owner/operator may determine that it is impracticable to provide sized secondary
containment in accordance with §112.9(c)(2). Pursuant to §112.7(d), the SPCC Plan must clearly
explain why secondary containment is not practicable, and document how the additional regulatory
requirements of §112.7(d) are implemented.  Owners or operators of unmanned facilities may need
to determine how to effectively implement a contingency plan. This may involve additional site
inspections, or some other method as determined appropriate by a Professional Engineer.
 »Tlp
 Because a pit used as a form of secondary containment may pose a threat to birds and wildlife if oil is
 present in the pit, EPA encourages owners or operators who use a pit to take measures to mitigate the
 effect of the pit on birds and wildlife. Such measures may include netting, fences, or other means to keep
 birds or animals  away.  In some cases, pits may also cause a discharge as described in §112.1{b). The
 discharge may occur when oil spills over the top of the pit or when oil seeps through the ground into the
 groundwater, and then to navigable waters or adjoining shorelines. Therefore, EPA recommends that an
 owner or operator not use pits in an area where such pit may prove a source of such discharges. Should
 the oil reach navigable waters or adjoining shorelines, it is a reportable discharge under 40 CFR 110.6.
 (67 FR 47116)
4.4.6  Secondary Containment Requirements for Onshore Drilling or Workover Equipment,
       §112.10{c)
       Section 112.10(c) applies to onshore oil drilling and
workover facilities. Areas with drilling and workover equipment
are required to provide catchment basins or diversion structures to
intercept and contain discharges of fuel, crude oil, or oily drilling
fluids.  This provision contains no specific sizing requirement, and
no freeboard requirement; it is essentially very similar to the
general containment requirement of §112.7(c).
                     §112.10(0)
                     Provide catchment basins or
                     diversion structures to intercept
                     and contain discharges of fuel,
                     crude oil, or oily drilling fluids.

                     Note: The above text is an excerpt of
                     the SPCC rule. See 40 CFR part
                     112 for the full text of the rule.
as. Environmental Protection Agency
4-41
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
       The facility owner/operator may determine that it is impracticable to provide secondary
containment in accordance with §112.10(c).  Pursuant to §112.7(d), the SPCC Plan must clearly
explain why secondary containment is not practicable, and document how the additional regulatory
requirements of §112.7(d) are implemented.

4.5   Measures Required in Place of Secondary Containment

       Pursuant to §112.7(d), if secondary containment is impracticable for any area where
secondary containment requirements apply, facility owners or operators must clearly explain in the
SPCC Plan why such secondary containment is impracticable and implement additional
requirements. This section describes these additional requirements.

4.5.1   Integrity Testing of Bulk Storage Containers

       When a facility owner or operator shows that secondary containment around a bulk storage
container is impracticable, he or she must conduct periodic integrity testing of the container
(§112.7(d)>.  Integrity testing is any means to measure the strength (structural soundness) of the
container shell, bottom, and/or floor to contain oil. Integrity testing should be done in accordance
with good engineering practice, considering applicable industry standards. For a thorough
discussion of integrity testing,  see Chapter 7 of this document. Chapter 7 describes the scope and
frequency of inspections and tests, considering industry standards and the characteristics of the
container.  When there is no secondary containment around a container, however, good
engineering practice should indicate a more stringent integrity testing schedule than would  be
required for a container if secondary containment were in place. Although the 2002 revised SPCC
rule does not incorporate specific inspection frequency, certain industry standards require more
frequent and/or more intensive inspection of containers when they do not have secondary
containment.3
       The EPA inspector should verify that the Plan describes the integrity testing of bulk storage
containers, in particular for those containers for which secondary containment is impracticable.  The
inspector should also review testing records to ensure that the inspection program is implemented
as described.
4.5.2   Periodic Integrity and Leak Testing of the Valves and Piping

       When the facility owner or operator determines that secondary containment for bulk storage
containers is impracticable, he/she must also perform periodic integrity and leak testing of valves
and piping associated with the containers for which secondary containment is impracticable
(§112.7(d)).  Leak testing determines the liquid tightness of valves and piping and whether they
may discharge oil.  Leak testing should be performed in accordance with appropriate industry
        3 The Steel Tank Institute's "Standard for the Inspection of Aboveground Storage Tanks," SP001, 3rd
  Edition, Steel Tank Institute, July 2005 (summarized in Chapter 7 of this document) requires more frequent
  inspections of tanks that do not have adequate secondary containment.
US. Environmental Protection Agency
4-42
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
                                       Chapter 4:  Secondary Containment and Impracticability
standards.  Chapter 7 provides an overview of integrity and leak testing of valves and piping. As for
integrity testing, good engineering practice may suggest a more stringent leak testing schedule than
would be required if secondary containment were in place. The PE certifies that the extent of this
testing is in accordance with good engineering practice, including consideration of applicable
industry standards (§112.3{d)).

       The EPA inspector should verify that the Plan describes the integrity and leak testing of
valves and  piping  associated with containers for which secondary containment is impracticable.
The inspector should also review testing records to ensure that the testing program is implemented
as described.

4.5.3   Oil Spill Contingency Plan and Written Commitment of Resources

       Unless he  or she has submitted a Facility Response Plan under §112.20, an owner or
operator who claims that secondary containment is impracticable must include with the SPCC Plan
an oil spill contingency plan following the provisions of 40 CFR part 109 and a written commitment
of manpower, equipment, and  materials required to expeditiously control and remove any quantity
of oil that may be harmful (§112.7(d)).

       The requirements for the content of contingency plans are given in 40 CFR part 109, Criteria
for State, Local, and Regional  Oil Removal Contingency Plans. The elements of the contingency
plan are outlined in §109.5, and include:

              Definition of the authorities, responsibilities, and duties of all persons, organizations,
             or agencies that are to be involved or could be involved in planning or directing oil
              removal operations.
              Establishment of notification procedures for the purpose of early detection and timely
              notification of an oil discharge.
             Provisions to ensure that full resource capability is known and can be committed
             during an oil discharge situation.
             Provisions for well-defined and specific actions to be taken after discovery and
              notification of an oil discharge.
       •     Specific and well-defined procedures to facilitate recovery of damages and
             enforcement measures as provided for by state and local statutes and ordinances.

       Please refer to the model contingency plan found in Appendix F of this document for an
example contingency plan prepared in compliance with the SPCC rule and 40 CFR part 109.

        As  described in 67 FR 47105, a "written commitment" of manpower, equipment, and
materials means either a written contract or other written documentation showing that the
owner/operator has made provision for items needed for response purposes.  According to 40 CFR
109.5, the commitment includes:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency         4-43                      Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
       *      Identification and inventory of applicable equipment, materials, and supplies that are
              available locally and regionally;
              An estimate of the equipment, materials, and supplies that would be required to
              remove the maximum oil discharge to be anticipated;
       •      Development of agreements and arrangements in advance of an oil discharge for the
              acquisition of equipment, materials, and supplies to be used in responding to such a
              discharge;
       •      Provisions for well-defined and specific actions to be taken after discovery and
              notification of an oil discharge, including specification of an oil discharge response
              operating team consisting of trained, prepared, and available operating personnel;
       *      Predesignation of a properly qualified oil discharge response coordinator who is
              charged with the responsibility and delegated commensurate authority for directing
              and coordinating response operations and who knows how to request assistance
              from federal authorities operating under current national and regional contingency
              plans;
       *      A preplanned location for an oil discharge response  operations center and a reliable
              communications system for directing the coordinated overall response actions;
              Provisions for varying degrees of response effort depending on the severity of the oil
              discharge; and
       •      Specification of the order of priority in which the various water uses are to be
              protected where more than one water use may be adversely affected as a  result of
              an oil discharge and where response operations may not be adequate to protect all
              uses. (67 FR 47105)

       For a contingency plan to satisfy the requirements of §112.7(d), facilities must be able to
implement the contingency plan. Activation of the contingency plan is contingent upon the
discharge of oil being detected.  As part of evaluating the adequacy of the contingency plan
developed to satisfy requirements of §112.7(d), the EPA inspector should consider the time it takes
facility personnel to detect and mitigate a  discharge to navigable waters and adjoining shorelines.
For example, at an unmanned facility, effective implementation of the contingency plan may involve
enhanced discharge detection methods such as more frequent facility visits and inspections, or the
use of spit! detection equipment.

4.5.4  Role of the EPA Inspector in Reviewing Impracticability Determinations

       Like other technical aspects of the SPCC Plan, determinations of impracticability must be
reviewed by the PE certifying the Plan in accordance with §112.3(d) to ensure that they are
consistent with good engineering practice. The inspector should verify that the Plan has been
certified by the PE and that the additional measures specified in §112.7(d) are documented in the
Plan, as explained below.

       By certifying a Plan,  a PE attests that the Plan has been prepared in accordance with good
engineering practice, that it meets the requirements of 40 CFR part 112,  and that it is adequate for
the facility.  Thus,  if impracticability determinations and the corresponding alternative measures and
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
4-44
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
                                       Chapter 4: Secondary Containment and Impracticability
contingency plan have been reviewed by the certifying PE and are properly documented, they
should generally be considered acceptable by regional EPA inspectors. However, if an
impracticability determination and/or the additional required measures do not meet the standards of
common sense, appear to be at odds with recognized industry standards, do not meet the overall
objective of oil spill response/prevention, or appear to be inadequate for the facility, appropriate
follow-up action may be warranted.  In this case, the EPA inspector should clearly document the
concerns (including photographs and drawings of the facility configuration, flow direction, and
proximity to navigable waters) to assist RA review and follow-up. This may include requesting
additional information from the facility owner or operator to justify the impracticability determination.
An owner/operator making a determination of impracticability should have considered all
appropriate options for secondary containment, and the  documentation presented in support of the
impracticability determination should include a discussion of the reasons why the various
reasonable options are impracticable.

       The example below provides an example of an inadequate impracticability determination.
The supporting discussion provided in the example does not provide a sufficient discussion of the
reasons why the concrete dike is not practicable.  It also fails to address, even in general terms,
whether means of secondary containment other than a concrete dike may be practicable (e.g.,
remote impoundment, drainage systems, or active measures). Finally, the discussion does not
provide information on the measures that are provided in lieu of secondary containment and how
the facility intends to implement the contingency plan, commit manpower and equipment to
respond, and perform the required testing on the bulk storage containers and associated piping and
appurtenances. Refer to §112.7(c)  and  (d) for a list of available secondary containment options as
well as the additional measures required in the SPCC Plan when a determination of impracticability
is made.

       Bad Example: Bulk Storage Containers
       Bulk Storage Tanks - 40 CFR 112.8(c)(2)
       XYZ Oil has determined that secondary containment is impracticable for the two bulk storage
       tanks located to the east of the maintenance building. There is not sufficient space to build a
       concrete dike because of the proximity to the property line. XYZ Oil is therefore implementing
       a contingency plan for this portion of the facility.
       For comparison, the following example provides an adequate impracticability determination.
The supporting discussion provided in the example clearly explains why various methods of
secondary containment measures are not practicable, and documents the measures that the facility
has implemented in lieu of secondary containment.

       Good Example: Bulk Storage Containers
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
4-45
VersionlO, 11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors

       Bulk Storage Tanks-40 CFR112.8(c)(2)
       XYZ Oil has determined that secondary containment is impracticable for the two bulk storage
       tanks located to the east of the maintenance building. There is not sufficient space to
       accommodate a dike or berm with the required containment capacity due to minimum
       setbacks and maximum dike height. A dike or berm with the required capacity would either
       encroach on the neighbor's property and/or exceed a 6-feet safe wall height (OSHA
       Flammable and combustible liquids regulation, 29 CFR 1910.106). The facility also lacks the
       space necessary for remote impoundment. Other measures listed under §112.7(c) such as
       the use of sorbents would not be a reliable and effective means of secondary containment
       since the volumes involved may exceed the sorbent capacity.

       The tanks are currently in good condition and do not need to be replaced. However, tanks of
       double-wall design may be considered as potential replacement in the  future.

       Because secondary containment for these two bulk storage tanks is impracticable, XYZ Oil
       has provided in this SPCC Plan the additional elements required under 40 CFR 112.7(d),
       namely:

       •       Periodic integrity testing of bulk storage containers, and periodic integrity and leak testing of
              valves and piping {see Section 2.7 of the SPCC Plan).
       •       A written commitment of manpower, equipment, and materials required to  expedftiously
              control and remove any quantity of oil discharged that may be  harmful {see Appendix F of the
              SPCC Plan).
              An Oil Spit! Contingency Pian following the provisions of 40 CFR part 109 (see Appendix G of
              the SPCC Plan).
       In addition to verifying that the SPCC Plan clearly describes the reason why secondary
containment measures are not practicable and documents the implementation of the additional
measures required in §112.7(d), the EPA inspector should verify that:

              The facility's contingency plan can be implemented as written;
              The equipment for response is available;
       •       The commitment of manpower, equipment, and materials is documented;
       •       The contingency plan describes the location of drainage systems, containment
              deployment locations, and oil collection areas (including recovered oil storage
              capability);
              There are procedures for early detection of oil discharges; and
       *       There is a defined set of response actions.

       Figure 4-10 provides a checklist an EPA inspector can review to verify that all the criteria of
§109.5 are included in a facility's oil spill contingency plan. The EPA inspector may also refer to the
checklist included in Figure 4-11 at the end of this chapter when identifying and reviewing technical
rule requirements that are eligible for the impracticability provision.

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency        4-46                      Version 1.0,11 /28/2005

-------
                                         Chapter 4: Secondary Containment and Impracticability
Figure 4-10. Checklist of required components of state, local, and regional oil removal contingency
plans.  Please refer to the complete text of 40 CFR §109.5.
109.5-Development and Implementation criteria for state, local, and regional oil removal
contingency plans*
Definition of the authorities, responsibilities and duties of all persons, organizations or agencies which are to be involved in
planning or directing oil removal operations.
Establishment of notification procedures for the purpose of early detection and timely notification of an oil discharge including:
(1) The identification of critical water use areas to facilitate the reporting of and response to oil discharges.
(2) A current list of names, telephone numbers and addresses of the responsible persons (with alternates)
and organizations to be notified when an oil discharge is discovered.
(3) Provisions for access to a reliable communications system for timely notification of an oil discharge, and
the capability of interconnection with the communications systems established under related oil removal
contingency plans, particularty State and National plans (e.g., NCR).
(4) An established, prearranged procedure for requesting assistance during a major disaster or when the
situation exceeds the response capability of the State, local or regional authority.
Provisions to assure that full resource capability is known and can be committed during an oil discharge situation including:
(5) The identification and inventory of applicable equipment, materials and supplies which are available
locally and regionally.
(6) An estimate of the equipment, materials and supplies which would be required to remove the maximum
oil discharge to be anticipated.
(7) Development of agreements and arrangements in advance of an oil discharge for the acquisition of
equipment, materials and supplies to be used in responding to such a discharge.
Provisions for well defined and specific actions to be taken after discovery and notification of an oil discharge including:
(8) Specification of an oil discharge response operating team consisting of trained, prepared and available
operating personnel.
(9) Predesignation of a property qualified oil discharge response coordinator who is charged with the
responsibility and delegated commensurate authority for directing and coordinating response operations
and who knows how to request assistance from Federal authorities operating under existing national
and regional contngency plans.
(10) A preplanned location for an oil discharge response operations center and a reliable communications
system for directing the coordinated overall response operations.
(11) Provisions for varying degrees of response effort depending on the severity of the oil discharge.
(12) Specification of the order of priority in which the various water uses are to be protected where more than
one water use may be adversely affected as a result of an oil discharge and where response operations
may not be adequate to protect all uses.
Specific and well defined procedures to facilitate recovery of damages and enforcement measures as provided for by State
and local statutes and ordinances.
Yes No










* The contingency plan should be consistent with all applicable state and local plans, Area Contingency Plans, and the
National Contingency Plan (NCP).
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
4-47
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
               1=
                  o v
                         8.
              i i  f
              1   -s
Nonconfo
                 -s    5
                 un   c  Q- o
                         1 -B '
                                                      O
                                                      2
                                                      o>
                               s ,.. i" - ' s 1 > s „. g •-
                                     '
                               o>^
!
.0
3
CD
O

8
     O
     •fl
JJ
*
i-
3
8
••s
s
f
t_
£
i
.a
=
ID
I
o

£
'5
     w
     "o
     «
     3
4
S.
01
              1 J £
Evaluation
            .2  °

               x =
             iiii
              «»
              £ c

                        o 9
                      inn
                               ^   .s
                               .MoSa
                               » « « c

                               «!

                      .i
                        Ufi
                           *
                                        i
                                     8 I f :
                                     55?^


                             Q
                             2
                             °- sr
                             =! ?;
                                    CL
          10
                      01
                      ^
                             X
                             (A
                             111
                                                 fr
                                                 I
                                                 «^
                                                 •§
                                                 
-------
-Q
(0
CJ
B
1
£
•Q
§
1
|
s
§
o
S1
•5
1
0>
*
n\
•5.
•C
O



















































































01
O
c
K
1
8
c
o



o
c
1
•c
41





g
O
1
UJ




*• "at
C •£•
is c
||

co


^
c
u
E

UJ

1































U)
Ui
J
o
3
u.
z
o
F
u
Q
|

J
O
LU
(j£
o
in
o
i ,
_W O. &
*- M O ^
c So

OS "c ® S
o T» E .-61 •»
O  £ ^- nj
t S 'E a? -2
1 l| 11
1 |i^|fs
c c oi '£ 5 ? "S
« -« "5 -2 c « ^
1 1 1 1 5 1 1 1
i '-g 1 1 i i « |
1 III fill



"S

n
_
~
0
1
O
0
>.
OT ^
Irt C
(Q O
v a.
n 01
.£
1 1
||
1 1
5 ^
-fc ^





tv"
2
oi
rsi
^~






a»
 S E S* —
-S ° § s "S
c a. u u  <
< .= 8 t ^
g
o:
o

S D
*— ' S

2 -a
**" S
2 "•
1 ^
is
C Q)
2 en
'SI
I .2
•il.
i « 1
1 is
8 f |
< 2 'S




^J.
5"
^
CM
^





O
01
1
JT5
O
f
•^
"o -5
c* o>
I '1
.«" ^
S1 ^
! 1
1 |V
«- I 1 I
1 "i « 1
1 8 e "
It .11
^ "s 1 1
E 1 »|
Ills
0) Q ui ra



































.1
2
cn


•4

-------

-------
                                                              Chapter 5: OHA/Vater Separators
                           OIL/WATER SEPARATORS
5.1    Introduction
       The wastewater treatment exemption in §112.1(d)(6) excludes from SPCC requirements
facilities or parts of facilities that are used exclusively for wastewater treatment, as long as they are
not used to meet other requirements of 40 CFR part 112. This chapter clarifies the applicability of
this exemption to oil/water separators (including equipment, vessels, and containers that are not
specifically called "oil/water separators" but
perform oil/water separation, such as water
clarifiers at wastewater treatment plants).
                 §112.1(d)
                 Except as provided in paragraph (f) of this
                 section, this part does not apply to:... (6) Any
                 facility or part thereof used exclusively for
                 wastewater treatment and not used to satisfy
                 any requirement of this part.  The production,
                 recovery, or recycling of oil is not wastewater
                 treatment for purposes of this paragraph.

                 Note: The above text is an excerpt of the SPCC rule.
                 Refer to the full text of 40 CFR part 112.
       The intended use of an oil/water
separator determines whether the separator is
subject to the SPCC regulations and, if so, what
provisions are applicable.  As outlined in Table
5-1 below, oil/water separators may be used for
several different purposes: to treat wastewater,
to meet secondary containment requirements of
40 CFR part 112, or as part of the oil production
process.  Only oil/water separators used exclusively to treat wastewater and not used to satisfy any
requirement of part 112 are exempt from all SPCC requirements. Oil/water separators used in oil
production and to meet the secondary containment requirements of the rule are not exempt.

Table 5-1.  SPCC rule applicability for various uses of oil/water separators.
    Wastewater Treatment
  Secondary Containment
       Oil Production
 Separators are exempt from all
 SPCC requirements in
 accordance with §112.1(d)(6) and
 do not count toward facility
 storage capacity.
Separators that are used as part
of a secondary containment
system and are not intended for
oil storage or use do not
themselves require secondary
containment, and do not count
toward facility storage capacity.
However, they are subject to the
design specifications (e.g.,
capacity) for the secondary
containment requirements with
which they are designed to
comply.	
Separators that are bulk storage
containers, subject to the
provisions of §§112.9(c) or
112.11(b)and(d), are not exempt
and count toward the facility
storage capacity.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
             5-1
       Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
       The remainder of this chapter is organized as follows:

       •       Section 5.2 summarizes the provisions of the SPCC rule that apply to the three uses
              of oil/water separators identified above.
       •       Section 5.3 discusses the use of an oil/water separator for wastewater treatment
              and the exemption for this use.
       *       Section 5.4 addresses the use of an oil/water separator as secondary containment
              and the applicable SPCC requirements.
       *       Section 5.5 discusses the use of an oil/water separator in oil production and the
              applicable SPCC requirements.
       *       Section 5.6 describes required documentation for oil/water separators and the role
              of the EPA inspector in reviewing facilities with oil/water separators.

5.2   Overview of Provisions Applicable to Oil/Water Separators
       Section 112.1 (d)(6) addresses oil/water separators used for wastewater treatment.
Facilities or equipment used exclusively for wastewater treatment, and which do not satisfy any
requirements of the SPCC rule, are exempt from the SPCC rule requirements. These oil/water
separators do not count toward facility storage capacity.  Whether a wastewater treatment facility or
part thereof is used exclusively for wastewater treatment or used to satisfy an SPCC requirement
will often be a facility-specific determination based upon the activities carried out at the facility and
upon its configuration.

       Drainage systems that satisfy the secondary containment requirements of the SPCC rule
may use oil/water separators to recover oil and return it to the facility (see Chapter 4 of this
document for a description of secondary containment requirements).  Examples of oil/water
separators that are used to meet SPCC requirements include oil/water separators used to satisfy
the secondary containment requirements of §§112.7{c), 112.7(h)(1), 112.8(c)(2), 112.8(c)(11),
112.12(c)(2),  and/or 112.12(c)(11). Additionally, the drainage provisions in §§112.8{b) and 112.9(b)
set forth design specifications for secondary containment at a facility. Oil/water separators may be
used as part of a facility drainage system to meet the secondary containment requirements of the
rule. Oil/water separators used to  satisfy these rule requirements are subject to applicable
secondary containment requirements, but they do not count toward storage capacity.
       As stated in §112.1(d)(6), production,
recovery, and recycling of oil are not considered
wastewater treatment and, thus, are not eligible
for the wastewater treatment exemption.  For
purposes of §112.1 (d)(6), this means recovery
and recycling of crude oil at facilities associated
with, and downstream of, production facilities,
such as saltwater disposal and  injection
   §112.9
-------
                                                                  Chapter 5: Oil/Water Separators
facilities.  Section 112.9(c)(2) includes
requirements for oil/water separators (e.g., gun
barrels, heater-treaters) used at onshore oil
production facilities.  This provision specifically
identifies the secondary containment and
drainage requirements for at! tank battery,
separation, and treating facility installations,
including oil/water separators.  Examples of
oil/water separators associated with oil
production, separation, and treatment include
free water knock-outs, two- and three-phase
separators, and gun barrels.

       Sections 112.11(b) and (d) include the
applicable provisions for oil/water separators
located at offshore oil production facilities.

       Figure 5-1 helps determine the use of an
oil/water separator at SPCC-regulated facilities
and identifies the corresponding rule
requirements or exemptions based upon each
use.
    Use oil drainage collection equipment to
    prevent and control small oil discharges
    around pumps, glands, valves, flanges,
    expansion joints, hoses, drain lines,
    separators, treaters, tanks, and associated
    equipment.  You must control and direct facility
    drains toward a central collection sump to
    prevent the facility from having a discharge as
    described in§112.1(b).  Where drains and
    sumps are not practicable, you must remove
    oil contained in collection equipment as often
    as necessary to prevent overflow.

    Note: The above text is an excerpt of the SPCC rule.
    Refer to the full text of 40 CFR part 112.
    At facilities with areas where separators and
    treaters are equipped with dump valves which
    predominantly fail in the closed position and
    where pollution risk is high, specially equip the
    facility to prevent the discharge of oil. You
    must prevent the discharge of oil by:
    (1) Extending the flare line to a diked area if
    the separator is near shore;
    (2) Equipping the separator with a high liquid
    level sensor that will automatically shut in wells
    producing to the separator; or
    (3) Installing parallel redundant dump valves.

    Note: The above text is an excerpt of the SPCC rule.
    Refer to the full text of 40 CFR part 112.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
5-3
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
  8
  ra
  Q.
  
-------
                                                            Chapter 5: Oil/Water Separators
5.3   Oil/Water Separators Used in Wastewater Treatment

5.3.1   Description of Oil/Water Separator Use in Wastewater Treatment

       Oil/water separators used to pre-treat wastewater are usually of two kinds: standard gravity
separators or enhanced gravity separators.1 Standard gravity separators, as illustrated in Figure 5-
2 (separator designs may vary), are liquid containment structures that provide sufficient hydraulic
retention time to allow oil droplets to rise to the surface.  The oil forms a separate layer that can
then be removed by skimmers, pumps, or other methods. The wastewater outlet is located below
the oil level so that water leaving the separator is free of the oil that accumulates at the top of the
unit. The inlet is often fitted with  diffusion  baffles to reduce turbulent flow that might prevent
effective separation of the oil and might re-suspend settled pollutants.
               Figure 5-2. Standard gravity oil/water separator.
Enhanced gravity separators allow the separation of smaller oil droplets within confined spaces.
These separators use a variety of coalescing media and small diameter cartridges that enhance
laminar flow and separation of smaller oil droplets that accumulate on the separator surface for
removal. Figure 5-3 shows coalescing plates in the middle compartment (separator designs may
vary).
  forces.
          Other types of separators include vortex separators, which combine gravity with centrifugal
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
5-5
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
             Figure 5-3. Enhanced gravity oil/water separator.
       Oil/water separators are flow-through equipment in which wastewater enters the separator
and treated water exits the separator on a continual basis. To be effective, the oil/water separator
is sized appropriately in order for the unit to separate and contain the intended oil capacity, in
addition to the flow-through wastewater quantity.  Also, the design flow rate of the oil/water
separator is carefully considered when specifying a wastewater treatment system, as a flow rate
above the maximum rate of the separator will cause the discharge of accumulated oil and/or
untreated wastewater. The specifications from oil/water separator manufacturers typically outline
these and other design factors to consider, along with operation and maintenance requirements, to
ensure that the oil/water separator is correctly constructed and operated for its intended use.

5.3.2  Applicability of the SPCC Rule to Oil/Water Separators Used for Wastewater
       Treatment
       Section 112.1 (d)(6) exempts "any facility or part thereof that is used exclusively for
wastewater treatment and is not used to meet any other requirement of the rule (excluding oil
production, recovery, and recycling facilities).  Certain components of wastewater treatment
facilities, such as treatment systems at publicly owned treatment works (POTWs) and industrial
wastewater treatment facilities treating oily wastewater, likely meet the two criteria for this
exemption.

       POTWs and other wastewater treatment facilities may have bulk storage containers and oil-
filled equipment, as well as exempt oil/water separators. The capacity of the bulk storage
containers and oil-filled equipment is counted to determine whether the facility is subject to the
requirements of the SPCC  rule. Only the oil/water separator capacity does not count toward the
overall storage capacity of the facility. Thus, the presence of an oil/water separator at an otherwise
regulated facility does not exempt the entire facility from the SPCC rule requirements. At
wastewater treatment facilities, storage capacity to be counted  includes bulk storage containers,
hydraulic equipment associated with the treatment process, containers used to store oil that feed an
emergency generator associated with wastewater treatment, and slop tanks or other containers
used to store oil resulting from treatment. Any separate container used to store oil recovered by the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
5-6
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
                                                            Chapter 5: Oil/Water Separators
separation process or any other equipment or containers at a regulated facility that do not qualify for
the wastewater treatment exemption are required to meet all applicable SPCC requirements (67 FR
47069).

       Oil/water separators used exclusively for wastewater treatment are flow-through separators
and are not engaged in a static process in an isolated container. For example, a bulk storage
container containing an oil and water mixture, and from which water is drawn from the bottom, does
not constitute wastewater treatment.

       Examples of oil/water separators that may be considered wastewater treatment and may be
eligible for the exemption of §112.1 (d)(6) include:

       •      Oil/water separators at a wastewater treatment facility;
       *      Oil/water separators at an active groundwater remediation site;
             Grease traps that intercept and congeal oil and grease from liquid waste; and
             Oil/water separators in landfill leachate collection systems.

       Oil/water separators exempted from the SPCC  rule may, however, be subject to other
federal, state, and local regulations.  In addition, a separate container storing oil removed from an
exempt separator is considered a bulk storage container and is subject to  the SPCC rule
requirements.

       Many of these exempted wastewater treatment oil/water separators are within wastewater
treatment facilities or parts thereof subject to the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) requirements under section 402 of the Clean Water Act (CWA).  NPDES (or an approved
state permit program) ensures review and approval of the facility's wastewater treatment plans and
specifications, operation/maintenance manuals and procedures, and requires a Storm Water
Pollution Prevention Plan, which may include a  Best Management Practice (BMP) Plan.

        BMPs are additional conditions that may supplement effluent limitations  in NPDES permits.
In addition, other affected facilities need a BMP Plan for storm water runoff control  under an
NPDES permit.  Under §402(a)(1) of CWA, BMPs may be imposed when the Administrator
determines that such conditions are necessary to carry out the provisions  of the Act.2

       Additionally, some facilities may be subject to pretreatment standards promulgated under
§307(b) of CWA. Pretreatment standards apply to "indirect discharges" that go first to a POTW via
a collection system before being discharged to navigable waters, and they concern pollutants that
pass through POTWs untreated or interfere with the operation of POTWs. The General
Pretreatment Regulations for Existing or New Sources of Pollution, found at 40 CFR part 403,
prohibits an indirect discharger from  introducing into a POTW a pollutant that passes through or
interferes with treatment processes at the POTW, and also sets the framework for the
        2 See discussion of authority for NPDES and BMP provisions in the preamble to the 2002 revised
  SPCC rule, 67 FR 47068.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
5-7
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
implementation of categorical pretreatment standards. Specifically, 40 CFR 403.5(b)(6) prohibits
the introduction into a POTW of "petroleum, oil, nonbiodegradable cutting oil, or products of mineral
oil origin in amounts that will cause interference or pass through."

5.3.3   Wastewater Treatment Exemption Clarification for Dry Gas Production Facilities

       As EPA stated in a Federal Register notice (69 FR 29728), produced water tanks at dry gas
facilities are eligible for the wastewater treatment exemption.  Gas facilities that do not produce
condensate or crude oil (i.e., dry gas facilities) do not meet the description of "oil production, oil
recovery, or oil recycling facilities.11 Therefore, produced water tanks used exclusively for
wastewater treatment at such facilities are eligible for the exemption.  Tanks that are eligible for the
exemption do not count toward storage capacity.

       At 69 FR 29730, EPA stated that "...[in] verifying that a particular gas facility is not an 'oil
production, oil recovery, or oil recycling facility,' the Agency plans to consider, as appropriate,
evidence at the facility pertaining to the presence or absence  of condensate or crude oil that can be
drawn off the tanks, containers or  other production equipment at the facility, as well as pertinent
facility test data and reports (e.g.,  flow tests, daily gauge reports, royalty reports or other production
reports required by state or federal regulatory bodies)."

5.4   Oil/Water Separators  Used to Meet SPCC Secondary Containment
       Requirements

5.4.1   Description of Oil/Water Separators Used to Meet SPCC Secondary Containment
       Requirements

       Oil/water separators can be used to meet the SPCC requirements for secondary
containment in §§112.7(c), 112.7(h)(1), 112.8(c)(2), 112.8{c)(11), 112.12(c)(2), and/or
112.12(c)(11). Additionally, §§112.8(b), 112.9(b), and 112.12(b) set forth design specifications for
drainage associated with secondary containment provisions at the facility.  Properly designed,
maintained, and operated oil/water separators may be used as part of a facility drainage system to
meet the secondary containment requirements of the rule.

       Standard gravity and enhanced gravity separators (Figures 5-2 and 5-3), or other types of
oil/water separators (separator designs may vary), may be used to meet secondary containment
requirements.  In this application, the  separators are expected to have oil and water present in the
system when there is an oil discharge or oil-contaminated precipitation runoff within the drainage
area. Generally, these separators should be monitored on a routine schedule and collected oil
should  be removed as appropriate in  accordance with procedures in the SPCC Plan.

       When  designing oil/water separators to be used as secondary containment (see Chapter 4
for a discussion of secondary containment requirements), good engineering practice would normally
indicate that a Professional Engineer  (PE) would consider:
US. Environmental Protection Agency
5-8
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
                                                             Chapter 5: Oil/Water Separators
       •      The drainage area that flows to the separator;
       •      The corresponding anticipated flow rate of the drainage system to the separator; and
       •      The appropriate capacity of the oil/water separator for oil and for wastewater.

       Many oil/water separators used for secondary containment are installed in areas where they
may receive considerable flow from precipitation. If the flow rate exceeds the maximum design rate
of the separator, the separator may discharge accumulated oil and/or untreated wastewater;
therefore, it may be an inappropriate choice for secondary containment and may result in a
discharge to navigable waters and adjoining shorelines.  The specifications from the oil/water
separator manufacturer outline these and other design factors as important items to consider when
specifying the use of a given oil/water separator for a given application. Additionally, the
manufacturer specifies the maintenance requirements for these separators that would ensure
proper operation of these devices.

       When oil/water separators are used to meet SPCC requirements they must be properly
operated and maintained to ensure that the unit will perform correctly  and as intended under the
potential discharge scenarios it is aimed to address (e.g., §§112.7(c),  112.8(c)(2),  and
112.12(c)(2)). The required oil/water separator capacity should always be available (i.e., oil should
not continually accumulate in the separator  over a period of time such that the required storage
capacity would not be available if an oil release were to occur within the drainage area). The use of
oil/water separators as a method of containment may be risky as they have limited drainage
controls to prevent a discharge of oil and rely heavily on proper maintenance.

5.4.2  Applicability of the SPCC Rule to Oil/Water Separators Used to Meet Specific SPCC
       Secondary Containment Requirements

       Section 112.7(c) requires "appropriate containment and/or diversionary structures or
equipment to prevent a discharge as  described in §112.1 (b)." An oil/water separator may be used
to satisfy this requirement for onshore or offshore facilities. This separator must be constructed to
contain oil and prevent an escape of oil from the system prior to cleanup in order to comply with the
secondary containment provision for which it is intended (§112.7(c».  A description explaining how
an oil/water separator complies with secondary containment provisions, and how it is operated and
maintained, should be included in the SPCC Plan. BMPs or O&M manuals which detail operation
and maintenance procedures for oil/water separators used specifically for secondary containment
may be referenced in the SPCC  Plan and maintained separately.

       Section 112.7(h}(1) requires "a quick drainage system" for areas where a tank car or tank
truck loading or unloading rack is present.  An oil/water separator may be used as part of a quick
drainage system to meet this requirement. This containment system must hold at least the
maximum capacity of any single  compartment of a tank car or tank truck loaded or unloaded at the
facility (§112.7(h)(1)).

       Sections 112.8(b), 112.9(b), and 112.12(b) set forth design specifications for drainage
systems associated with secondary containment at onshore facilities.  Environmentally equivalent

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency          5-9                      Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
measures can be used to satisfy these requirements (see Chapter 3 for a discussion of the
environmental equivalence provision). In order to comply with secondary containment
requirements, facilities might use ponds, lagoons, or catchment basins as part of the design criteria
for facility drainage systems. However, an oil/water separator might serve as an environmentally
equivalent measure to the ponds, lagoons, or catchment basins required by §§112.8(b)(3) and
112.12(b){3). In this instance, EPA recommends that the oil/water separator be designed to handle
the flow rate and volume of oil and water expected to be generated by facility operations. When
certifying a facility's SPCC Plan, the PE must verify that the oil/water separator is adequately
designed, maintained, and operated to provide environmentally equivalent protection (in
accordance with §112.7(a)(2)) under the potential discharge scenarios it is aimed to address, in
order to comply with the corresponding secondary containment provision.

       Sections 112.8(c)(2), 112.8{c)(11), 112.12(c)(2), and 112.12(c)(11) require that ail bulk
storage containers  be provided with secondary containment for "the entire capacity of the largest
single container and sufficient freeboard to contain precipitation." An oil/water separator may be
used for this purpose, but it must be appropriately sized to meet the requirements of the rule
provision for which  it is intended to comply.  The oil/water separator must be capable of handling
both the oil and precipitation that come into the separator from the general drainage area, and from
any accidental discharge from the largest bulk storage container located within the drainage area
for which the separator provides secondary containment (§112.8(c)(2), 112.8{c)(11), 112.12(c)(2),
and 112.12(c)(11)). Good engineering practice would suggest that the use  of oil/water separators
for the specific secondary containment provisions be on a very limited basis and typically with
smaller capacity container storage areas (e.g., drum storage area). For more information on
specific secondary  containment requirements for bulk storage containers, see Chapter 4 of this
document.

       The capacity of an oil/water separator used to meet secondary containment requirements
does not count toward a facility's overall  storage capacity.  Any volume of oil that would flow into the
oil/water separator  would come from another source within the  drainage area that is already
generally counted in the facility storage capacity determination. Containers used to store recovered
oil after oil/water separation, however, represent additional oil storage and count toward a facility's
total storage capacity. These include slop tanks or other containers used to store waste  oil.

       The SPCC rule does not require redundant secondary containment around oil/water
separators used for secondary containment (i.e., tertiary containment is not required).

5.5    Oil/Water Separators Used in Oil Production

5.5.1   Description of Oil/Water Separators Used in Oil Production

       Oil production oil/water separators are used at both onshore and offshore facilities.
Separators and other separation equipment,  such as heater-treaters and gun barrels, are used
during oil production to separate the well stream into individual well fluids after they are extracted
from the production well.  Different processes and equipment may be used to separate the  mixture

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency        5-10                     Version 1.0,  11 /28/2005

-------
                                                              Chapter 5: Oil/Water Separators
into oil/emulsion, water, and gas fractions.  All such equipment is considered a bulk storage
container needing specific secondary containment.  For purposes of this guidance, this chapter
focuses on those pieces of equipment that separate water from oil and the equipment through
which these fluids flow.

       There is quite a variety of production equipment used to separate and treat produced fluids.
Some are operated under low pressure conditions, while others are operated at high pressure. A
process called "free-water knockout," illustrated in Figure 5-4, is generally used to separate large
volumes of water from oil and gas generated from the well. Gun barrels, also called wash tanks,
are generally found in older or marginal fields and are used to provide quiet  retention time for the
water to settle out of the produced well fluids (see Figure 5-5).  A two-phase separator separates
the well fluids into a liquid (oil, emulsion,3 or water) and a gas.  The liquid exits the bottom of the
separator and the gas exits the top, as shown  in Figure 5-6. Three-phase separators separate well
fluids into oil/emulsion, gas, and water.  Gas exits from  the top, oil/emulsion  from the middle, and
water from the bottom of this type of vertical three-phase separator (Figure 5-7). Three-phase
separators are generally used when there is free water in the well fluids. If there is little or no free
water, a two-phase separator might be used instead. Another type of equipment used to separate
produced fluids, especially fluid emulsions, is termed a  "heater-treater." Heater-treaters use heat,
electricity, and/or chemicals to reduce the emulsion viscosity and to separate out free oil, water, and
gas in oii production. The designs of oil/water separators may differ from the examples provided.
                    Figure 5-4. Low pressure free-water knockout.
                                                                   Oil
                                                                  Oiititf
        3 An emulsion is a colloidal suspension of a liquid within another liquid. In this case, small droplets
  of oii are dispersed through water.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
5-11
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
                           Figure 5-5. Gun barrel oil/water
                           separator
                                                               >,V»t«r
                                                              ' 
-------
                                                              Chapter 5: Oil/Water Separators
       In separators used for oil production, the momentum of the fluid flow is absorbed at the inlet,
thereby reducing the fluid viscosity and allowing oil, gas, and water to separate out of solution. Gas
then rises and flows out at the top of the separator, while oil and water fall to the lower portion of the
vessel and coalesce in separate areas.  With the appropriate settling time, the more dense free
water settles beneath the less dense oil.  Liquid levels are maintained by float-actuated control
valves or dump valves. As the different pre-set liquid levels are reached, dump valves discharge
water and oil from the separator to appropriate storage areas:

              Water is discharged from the bottom of the separator to a water tank;
              Oil is discharged out at a higher level to a oil storage tank; and
       •      Gas flows continuously out at the top of the separator to sales, a meter run, a flare,
              or a recovery system.

5.5.2  Applicability of the SPCC Rule to Oil/Water Separators Used in Oil Production

       The SPCC rule's wastewater treatment exemption specifically states that the production of
oil is not wastewater treatment for the purposes of §112.1(d)(6). The focus of the separation
process in oil production is on removing water from oil, as opposed to removing oil from water.

       Additionally, as stated in the preamble to the 2002 revised SPCC rule, production facilities
generally lack NPDES or state-equivalent permits or prevention requirements, and thus lack the
protections that such permits provide. Furthermore, Underground Injection Control (UIC) permits
do not have prevention requirements for production facilities.  Production facilities are normally
unmanned and therefore lack constant human oversight and inspection.  Produced water generated
in the production process normally contains saline water as a contaminant in the oil, which in
addition to the toxicrty of the oil might aggravate environmental conditions in the case of a discharge
(67 FR 47068). In some areas of the United States, produced water is fresh and may be
discharged under a NPDES permit for beneficial use (e.g., irrigation, water for livestock).

       The goal of an oil production, oil recovery, or oil recycling facility is to maximize the
production or recovery of oil, while eliminating impurities in the oil, including water, whereas the
goal of a wastewater treatment facility is to purify water.  Neither an oil production facility nor an oil
recovery or recycling facility treats water; instead, it treats oil. For purposes of the wastewater
treatment exemption, produced water is not considered wastewater, and treatment of produced
water is not considered wastewater treatment. Therefore, a facility that stores, treats, or otherwise
uses produced water remains subject to the rule.  At oil drilling, oil production, oil recycling, or oil
recovery facilities, treatment units subject to the rule include open oil pits or ponds associated with
oil production operations, oil/water separators (e.g., gun barrels), and heater-treater units.  Open  oil
pits or ponds function  as another form of bulk storage container and are not used for wastewater
treatment  (67 FR 47068,9). Although the ratio of water to oil can be relatively high, the quantity of
oil involved can be still be substantial and pose a threat of a discharge to navigable waters and
adjoining shorelines.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
5-13
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
       Oil/water separators used in the production of oil (e.g., heater-treaters and gun barrels) and
other separation and treatment facility installations, are subject to the specific secondary
containment requirements for oil production facility bulk storage containers in §112.9(c)(2).
Therefore, oil/water separators used in oil production are considered bulk storage containers and
are subject to the applicable SPCC requirements under §112.9(c):

       *       Oil/water separators used in onshore oil production are subject to the provisions of
              §112.9(c).  For example, oil/water separators used in onshore oil production must
              have secondary containment designed to contain the capacity of the largest single
              container and sufficient freeboard to contain precipitation (§112.9(c}(2)). If specific
              secondary containment is determined to be impracticable for the equipment, the
              SPCC Plan must document the reason for impracticability and comply with the
              additional regulatory requirements in §112.7(d).

              Oil/water separators used in offshore oil production are subject to the provisions of
              §112.11 (b) and (d) to prevent a discharge of oil. However, if other provisions of the
              rule (except secondary containment) can  be met through alternative methods that
              provide environmental equivalence for this equipment, then the Plan must  include a
              description in accordance with §112.7(a)(2)

       *       Vessels and equipment, such as glycol dehydrators and inline heaters, that treat only
              gas and that do not separate, treat, or contain oil, are not subject to the SPCC rule.

       Oil/water separators used in oil production count toward the total storage capacity of the
facility and must be considered when determining if a facility is  regulated by the SPCC rule in
accordance with §112.1 (b) and (d)(2) and the definition of storage capacity in §112.2. In
determining applicability of any container for calculating the total facility storage capacity,  the
preamble to the 2002 rule states:

       The keys to the definition are the availability of the container for drilling,  producing,
       gathering, storing, processing, refining, transferring, distributing, using, or consuming oil,
       and whether it is available for one of those uses or whether it is permanently closed.
       Containers available for one of the above described uses count towards storage capacity,
       those not used for these activities do not. Types of containers counted as storage capacity
       would include some flow-through separators, tanks used for "emergency" storage,
       transformers, and other oil-filled equipment. (67 FR 47081)
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
5-14
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
                                                            Chapter 5: OH/Water Separators
5.6    Documentation  Requirements and the Role of the EPA Inspector

5.6.1   Documentation by Owner/Operator

       Oil/water separators used exclusively for wastewater treatment are exempt from all SPCC
requirements, and no documentation is required for this equipment in the SPCC Plan.

       For oil/water separators used to meet SPCC secondary containment requirements, the
SPCC Plan should discuss the separator design capacity, configuration, maintenance, operation,
and other elements of the drainage systems that ensure proper functioning and containment of the
oil as required by §112.7(a)(3)(iii). Examples of elements that this discussion should include are:

             The presence and configuration of valves to prevent the accidental release of oil;
       •      Routine visual  inspection of the oil/water separator, its contents,  and discharges of
             effluent;
             Preventive maintenance of facility equipment affecting discharge, including the
             removal of settled pollutants and collected oil;
             A drainage area that flows to the oil/water separator and corresponding anticipated
             flow rate of the drainage system to the separator;
       •      Appropriate capacity of the oil/water separator for oil and for wastewater;
             Provisions for adequate separate storage capacity (based on the containment sizing
             required  by the rule) to contain oil recovered in the oil/water separator; and
       •      Documentation associated  with the maintenance and inspection  of oil/water
             separators.

       A separate bulk storage container  used to store oil following separation  in any oil/water
separator (i.e., wastewater treatment, secondary containment, or oil production) is subject to all
applicable requirements of 40 CFR part 112, including §§112.8(c) or 112.9(c), as appropriate.

       For oil/water separators used in oil production, the oil/water separators are considered  bulk
storage containers to be included in the SPCC Plan.  The location of these containers must be
indicated on the facility diagram and discussed in the general requirements in accordance with
§112.7(a)(3).  For more information on facility diagrams, refer to Chapters of this document. The
facility owner/operator may determine that the sized secondary containment required for these
oil/water separators is impracticable, pursuant to §112.7(d). If impracticability is determined for
sized secondary containment, the SPCC Plan must clearly explain why secondary containment is
not practicable and provide an oil spill contingency plan following the provisions of 40 CFR part 109.
In addition, such facilities must conduct integrity and leak testing of bulk containers and associated
valves and piping, and provide a written commitment of manpower, equipment,  and materials to
respond to oil discharges (§112.7(d)).  For more information on impracticability, refer to Chapter 4
of this document.
US. Environmental Protection Agency
5-15
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
5.6.2  Role of the EPA Inspector

       As with other aspects of the SPCC Plan, the certifying PE will review the use of and
applicable requirements for oil/water separators at a facility and ensure that they are consistent with
good engineering practice.

       The EPA inspector will verify that any oil/water separators at a facility that are not addressed
in the SPCC Plan are in fact used exclusively for wastewater treatment and not to meet any
requirement of part 112. This review considers the intended and actual use of the separator. The
EPA inspector should consider the intended use of the separator at the facility (e.g., wastewater
treatment, secondary containment, oil production, recovery, or recycling), any flow diagrams
illustrating the use of the separator, and the design specifications of the unit in evaluating the
proper application of the wastewater exemption. The EPA inspector may also consider the flow-
through capacity of the separator, the emulsion of oil present within the separator, and the design
specifications of the unit in evaluating the use of the oil/water separator.

       For oil/water separators used to meet SPCC secondary containment requirements, the EPA
inspector will verify that the Plan includes, for each oil/water separator used as secondary
containment, a discussion of the separator design capacity, configuration, maintenance, and
operation, as well as other elements of the drainage systems that ensure proper functioning and
containment of the oil in accordance with  §112.7(a)(3)(iii).  Inspectors should  note the risk
associated with this form of containment and should evaluate the design, maintenance, operation,
and efficacy of oil/water separator systems used for containment very carefully. Generally, these
separators should be monitored on a routine  schedule, and collected oil should be removed as
appropriate and in accordance with the drainage procedures in the Plan.

       Oil/water separators used in the production of oil (e.g., heater-treaters and gun barrels) and
other separation and treatment facility installations, are subject to the specific secondary
containment requirements for oil production facility bulk storage containers in  §112.9(c)(2).  The
SPCC  Plan must address this equipment  and include the storage capacity of the equipment in the
storage capacity calculations (§112.1(b) and  (d)(2) and the definition of storage capacity in  §112.2.)
If sized secondary containment is determined to be impracticable for the equipment, the SPCC Plan
must document the reason for impracticability and comply with the additional regulatory
requirements in §112.7(d).

       By certifying the SPCC Plan, a PE attests that the Plan has been prepared in accordance
with  good engineering practice and with the requirements of 40 CFR part 112, and that the  Plan is
adequate for the facility. Thus, if the wastewater treatment exemption is certified by the PE or if
other oil/water separator uses are properly documented, they most likely will be considered
acceptable by EPA inspectors.  However, if the documented uses of the oil/water separators do not
meet the standards of common sense, appear to be incorrect, deviate from the use described in the
Plan, are not maintained or operated in accordance with the Plan, or simply do not operate
correctly, further follow-up action may be warranted. This may include a request for more
information or a Plan amendment in accordance with §112.4(d).
US. Environmental Protection Agency
5-16
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
                                                                 Chapter 6: Facility Diagrams
                                FACILITY DIAGRAMS
6.1    Introduction
       Section 112.7(a)(3) of the SPCC rule requires that facility owners and operators include in
the SPCC Plan a diagram of the facility that identifies the location and contents of oil containers,
connecting piping, and transfer stations.  The diagram helps to ensure safe and efficient response
actions, effective spill prevention and emergency planning, ease of Plan review by an EPA
inspector, and proper implementation of the Plan by facility personnel.  This chapter explains the
requirement for a facility diagram, provides guidelines on the necessary level of detail, and includes
several facility diagrams as examples.

6.1.1   Purpose

       The facility diagram is an important component of an SPCC Plan because the diagram is
used for prevention, planning, inspection, management, and response considerations. EPA and
facility inspectors, responders, and facility personnel need to be aware of the location of all
containers, piping, and transfer areas subject to the SPCC rule. The facility diagram may also
assist response efforts by helping responders determine the flow pathway of discharged oil and
take more effective measures to control the flow of oil.  This may avert damage to sensitive
environmental areas; may protect drinking water sources; and may help prevent discharges to other
conduits, to a treatment facility, or to navigable  waters or adjoining shorelines.  The diagram may
also serve to address the rule requirements by  describing, pictorially, the capacity and type of oil  in
each container, the associated discharge/drainage controls, and the flow path of a discharge
(§112.7(a)(3)(i) and (iii) and 112.7(b), respectively). Additionally, the diagram may be attached to a
facility inspection checklist to identify areas, containers, or equipment subject to inspection.
Diagrams may also help federal, state, or facility personnel avoid certain hazards and identify the
location of facility response equipment. Finally, by
informing responders of the location and content
of containers, a facility diagram helps to ensure
their safety in conducting response actions and to
protect property.
6.1.2  Requirements for a Facility Diagram

       A description of the physical layout of a
facility, including a facility diagram, is one of the
general requirements for an SPCC Plan. The
2002 revisions to the SPCC rule added a new
specific requirement in §112.7(a)(3) for a facility
diagram to be included in the Plan. Section
      §112.7(a)(3)
      Describe in your Plan the physical layout of the
      facility and include a facility diagram, which
      must mark the location and contents of each
      container. The facility diagram must include
      completely buried tanks that are otherwise
      exempted from the requirements of this part
      under §112.1(d)(4).  The facility diagram must
      also include all transfer stations and
      connecting pipes. ...

      Note: The above text is an excerpt of the SPCC rule.
      Refer to 40 C FR part 112 for the full text of the rule.
US. Environmental Protection Agency
6-1
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
112.7(a)(3) requires that the facility diagram include the location and contents of each container,
completely buried tanks (even if exempted from the SPCC requirements), transfer areas (i.e.,
stations), and connecting pipes. In addition to the requirement for a facility description and
diagram, §112.7(a)(3) lists additional items to be addressed in an SPCC Plan, including the type of
oil in each container and its capacity; discharge prevention measures; discharge or drainage
controls; countermeasures for discharge discovery, response, and cleanup; methods of disposal of
recovered materials; and  specific contact information. Please see §112.7(a)(3) for these
requirements in their entirety.

6.2   Preparing a Facility Diagram

       Facility diagrams provided  as part of an SPCC Plan often illustrate the following information:

Required by §112.7(a)(3):1

              Aboveground and underground storage tanks (including content and capacity);
              Mobile portable containers (including content and capacity);
              Hydraulic operating systems or manufacturing equipment;
       •       Oil-filled electrical transformers, circuit breakers, or other equipment (including
              content and capacity);
              Any other oil-filled equipment (including content and capacity);
       *       Oil pits or ponds (at production facilities);
              Oil/water separators (e.g., at tank batteries, separation, and treating facility
              installations associated with production facilities);
              Fill ports and connecting piping (scale of drawing permitting);
       •       Oil transfer areas; and
              Loading racks/unloading areas.
Recommended:
              Secondary containment structures, including oil/water separators used for
              containment;
              Storm drain inlets and surface waters that could be affected by a discharge;
              Direction of flow in the event of a discharge (which can serve to address the SPCC
              requirement under §112.7(b));
              Legend that indicates scale and identifies symbols used in the diagram;
              Location of response kits and firefighting equipment;
              Location of valves or drainage system control that could be used in the event of a
              discharge to contain oil on the site;
              Compass direction; and
        1 Containers that have a capacity of less than 55 gallons, are permanently dosed, or are otherwise exempt
  from the rule (with the exception of exempted underground storage tanks) are not required to be listed on the facility
  diagram.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
6-2
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
                                                                 Chapter 6: Facility Diagrams
             Topographical information and area maps.

In addition, for purposes of emergency response, EPA recommends, but does not require, that an
owner/operator mark on a facility diagram containers that store Clean Water Act (CWA) hazardous
substances (listed in 40 CFR part 116, Designation of Hazardous Substances) and label the
contents of these containers (67 FR 47097).

       While recognizing that SPCC Plans and their associated diagrams are facility-specific and
prepared with a certain amount of PE discretion, the following information is meant to facilitate a
common understanding of what EPA inspectors may expect to see in a facility diagram. The
remainder of this section provides guidelines for the recommended level of detail, how specific
containers and systems may be addressed, and the use of alternate  facility diagrams for meeting
the requirements of §112.7{a)(3).

6,2.1   Level of Detail

       The facility diagram should provide sufficient detail for the facility personnel to undertake
prevention activities, for EPA to perform an effective inspection, and  for responders to take effective
measures.  As with other aspects of the SPCC Plan, the facility diagram is to be prepared in
accordance with good engineering practice and reviewed by the PE as part of Plan certification.
Thus, the level of detail provided and the approach taken for preparing an adequate facility diagram
is primarily at the discretion of the certifying PE.

6.2.2.  Facility Description

       Section 112.7(a)(3) requires that the Plan include a description of the physical layout of the
facility.  In addition to marking the location and contents of each oil storage container at the facility,
this description may include information on the facility location, type,  size, and proximity to
navigable waters, as well as other relevant information. This general facility description is often
supplemented with a more specific description of containers subject to the SPCC rule to
complement what is required on the facility diagram (e.g., storage capacity and content).

6.2.3   Oil Containers
       The facility diagram must include all containers (including oil-filled equipment) that store 55
gallons or more of oil and must include information indicating the contents of these containers
(§112.7(a)(3)). The 2002 revisions to the SPCC rule established a minimum container size of 55
gallons. Pursuant to §112.1(d)(5), the rule does not apply to containers of less than  55 gallons, and
therefore they do  not need to be included on the facility diagram.

       In situations where diagrams become complicated due to the presence of multiple oil
storage containers or complex piping/transfer areas  at the facility, it may be difficult to indicate the
contents and capacity of the containers on the diagram  itself.  In order to simplify the diagram, the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
6-3
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
PE may choose to include that information on a separate log or sheet maintained in the Plan,
similar to the description outlined below for mobile/portable containers.

6.2.4  Mobile or Portable Containers

       The owner/operator must state the contents and location of each container on the diagram
of the facility (§112.7(a){3)). For portable containers (e.g., drums and totes), the facility
owner/operator may note the general contents of each container and provide more detailed content
information on a separate sheet or log, as well as other information,  such as container capacity, that
the PE determines to be appropriate to adequately describe the facility. If the contents of a
container change frequently, the contents may be recorded on a separate sheet or log, or on the
diagram (67 FR 47097).  In this case, the diagram should note that contents vary. Additionally, the
PE may choose to identify an area on the facility diagram (e.g., a drum storage area) and include a
separate log that can be updated by facility personnel. The PE should develop a reasonable
estimate of the number of containers in the area and the capacity of the containers, and consider
routine movement of the containers for the Plan. This estimate can be used to determine
applicability of the rule thresholds and provide a general description  of the mobile/portable
containers in the Plan. The PE should  also include a procedure for maintaining the log, in order to
avoid PE certification of technical amendments of the Plan as the number of mobile/portable
containers changes at the facility.

       Mobile containers should be marked on the facility diagram in their out-of-service or
designated storage area or where they are most frequently located, such as a warehouse drum
storage area. The facility owner/operator and certifying PE determine how best to represent
mobile/portable containers on the facility diagram, such as by developing a log or indicating primary
storage areas. If mobile containers are moved throughout the facility and do not immediately return
to a specified location easily identified on the facility diagram, the exact location could  be addressed
on a separate sheet or log. This log would complement the facility diagram and the SPCC Plan by
providing further information on the specific location and contents of mobile and portable
containers. In addition, the diagram must identify the final location of mobile or portable containers
(as required in §112.7(a)(3)) that return to a specific designated area to comply with the specific
secondary containment requirements in §112.8(c)(11). (See Chapter 4 of this  document for a
discussion of secondary containment requirements.)

6.2.5  Completely Buried Storage Tanks

       A facility diagram must include the location and contents of all containers required to be
addressed in the SPCC Plan (67 FR 47097 and §112.7(a)(3)). This includes exempt underground
storage tanks (USTs) as well as USTs that are subject to SPCC requirements  at the facility. The
rationale for this requirement is to help  response personnel to easily identify dangers from either fire
or explosion, or from physical  impediments during response activities.  For example, exempted
tanks may include completely buried USTs and piping systems at a gasoline service station that are
subject to all technical requirements of either 40 CFR part 280 or an approved state UST program
under 40 CFR part 281.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency        6-4                      Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
                                                                Chapter 6: Facility Diagrams
       As discussed in Chapter 2 of this document, a facility may have USTs that are subject to
SPCC requirements because they are deferred from compliance with some or all of the technical
requirements of 40 CFR part 280 {e.g., UST systems with field constructed tanks, any UST system
that stores fuel solely for use by an emergency power generator, airport hydrant fuel distribution
systems). Any USTs at a facility that are subject to SPCC requirements must also be marked on
the facility diagram (§112.7{a)(3)).  (See the preamble to the 1991  proposed rule, 56 FR 54612,
October 22,1991.)

6.2.6   Piping and Manufacturing Equipment

       The facility diagram must also include all transfer stations (i.e., any location where oi! is
transferred) and connecting pipes (§112.7(a)(3)).  Associated piping and manufacturing equipment
present at an SPCC-regulated facility may be difficult to represent on a facility diagram, due to their
relative location, complexity, or design. Recognizing this, EPA allows flexibility in the way the
facility diagram is drawn.  An owner/operator may represent such systems in a less detailed manner
on the facility diagram in the SPCC Plan as long as more detailed diagrams of the systems are
maintained at the facility and referenced on the diagram. Examples of more detailed diagrams may
include blueprints, engineering diagrams, or diagrams developed to comply with other local, state,
or federal requirements.

       The scale and level of detail of the facility diagram may make it difficult to show small
transfer lines within containment structures. Schematic representations that provide a  general
overview of the piping service  (e.g., supply/return)  may provide sufficient information when
combined with a description of the piping in the Plan. Alternatively, overlay diagrams showing
different portions of the piping system may be used where the density and/or complexity of the
piping system would make a single diagram difficult to read.

       Examples of ways that manufacturing equipment may be represented include a box that
identifies the equipment and its location, or a simplified process flow diagram.  Figure 6-1, which is
an excerpt of a complete facility diagram (Figure 6-4) included later in Section 6.4, provides an
example showing how manufacturing equipment may be represented in a facility diagram.  For
areas of complicated piping, which often include different types, numbers,  and lengths of pipes, the
facility diagram may show a simplified box labeled "piping" or show a single line that identifies the
service (e.g., supply/return), as long as more detailed diagrams are available at the facility.  Figure
6-2 provides an example showing how a complex piping area may be represented in a facility
diagram, and is also an excerpt of the example facility diagram presented in Figure 6-4.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency         6-5                      Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
                Figure 6-1. Example showing how manufacturing equipment
                could be represented in a facility diagram.  Note that more
                detailed diagrams would need to be available at the facility.
                  Rtarn
                f-'iptf s; /V
                                             Accumulation Isf*
                                              10.300 aalfon
Figure 6-2. Example showing how a complex piping area could be represented in a facility
diagram.  Note that more detailed diagrams would need to be available at the facility.
                                     Piping A--«f3
US. Environmental Protection Agency
6-6
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
                                                                Chapter 6: Facility Diagrams
6.2.7   Use of State and Federal Diagrams

       Some state and federal regulations may require a diagram with similar or overlapping
requirements, whereas others do not. SPCC is a federal program that specifies minimum
requirements, which states may supplement with more stringent requirements. A facility diagram
prepared for a state or federal plan or for other purposes (construction permits, facility
modifications, or other pollution prevention requirements) may be used in an SPCC Plan if it meets
the requirements of the SPCC rule.

6.3   Facility Diagram Examples

       This section includes example facility diagrams for three fictitious SPCC-regulated facilities.
These three examples illustrate how certain containers and equipment could be represented in a
facility diagram; the examples are provided for the purpose of illustration only. Preparation of a
facility diagram  is  a site-specific effort, and the diagram prepared for a given facility should reflect
the level of detail needed to adequately describe the facility configuration. The level of detail and/or
approach taken for the examples below may not necessarily be appropriate for a given facility.

       It is important to note that facility diagrams, like the other elements of an SPCC Plan, must
be prepared in accordance with good engineering practice, and must be reviewed by the PE
certifying the Plan (§112.3(d)). Section 112.7(a)(3) requires the facility diagram to  show, at a
minimum, the location and contents of oil containers; completely buried storage tanks, including
those that may otherwise be exempt from the  rule; and transfer areas (i.e., stations) and connecting
pipes. The facility owner or operator may also include on the diagram additional structures and
equipment, and may use the diagram to illustrate other elements that may be relevant to the SPCC
Plan and to emergency response.  For instance, a diagram may also show the discharge and
drainage controls  that are described in the SPCC Plan, the predicted flow path for discharged oil
based on topography, areas on which to focus inspections, fire-fighting resources,  spill response
kits, and/or evacuation routes.

       Example facility diagrams are presented below for a bulk storage and distribution facility, a
manufacturing facility, and an oil production facility.

6.3,1   Example #1: Bulk Storage and Distribution Facility

       Figure 6-3 is an example of a diagram  for a bulk storage and distribution facility, which has a
tank farm, a loading rack and an unloading area, and other oil containers and oil-filled equipment.
This diagram corresponds to the model SPCC Plan for a bulk storage distribution facility that is
provided in Appendix D of this guidance document. Because it has fewer tanks and less complex
operations than a  manufacturing facility, for example, this facility requires a less detailed facility
diagram than the example provided in Figure 6-4.

       As required by §112.7(a)(3), this diagram includes all containers with an oil storage capacity
of 55 gallons or greater.  In addition to listing the contents directly on the diagram, the diagram
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
6-7
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
provides a reference to a supplementary table that contains the volume and content of the storage
tanks shown on the diagram (appended to the diagram as Table B-1).  At the discretion of the PE
who reviewed and certified the Plan, the example facility diagram also depicts secondary
containment methods and includes a reference to calculations of containment capacity provided in
other parts of the SPCC Plan.  Also, a separate log (Table B-2) identifies the contents of the drums
in the storage warehouse. Please refer to Section 6.2.3 of this document for more information.
US. Environmental Protection Agency
6-8
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
I/)
03
O>

(5

O)
T3

CO

01


'•5
(C
_o

TO

'
_
O
_c


E

S
O)
2
_§)
Q.
E
TO
X
LU
(O

£
                it   !    I
                    '

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
Table B-1.  Volume and contents of tanks and containers identified on the facility diagram.  Please
see facility diagram to identify the areas below.
Tank/Container
Area 1
Tankl
Tank 2
TankS
Tank 4
TankS
Tank 6
Volume (gallons)

25,
25,
25,
25,
30,
30,

Contents

000 | Product A - #2 fuel oil
000
000
000
000
000
Product A- #2 fuel oil
Product B - #6 fuel oil
Product B - #6 fuel oil
Product C - Kerosene
Product C - Kerosene
Main Office Building
TankH
2,000
Drum Storage Warehouse
Up to 30 drums
55
(each)
Heating oil

Various oil products
                                                           (lubricating oil, engine oil,
                                                           used oil, etc.)
Rev. 06/14/05
Table B-2.  Drum storage warehouse log.
   Date
 6/14/05
 6/14/05
 6/14/05
Number and Type
   of Container
    Contents
     Capacity
   Location at
      facility
15 drums
5 drums
10 drums
lubrication oil
engine oil
used oil
55x15 = 825
55 x 5 = 275
55x10 = 550
Drum storage
warehouse
Drum storage
warehouse
Drum storage
warehouse
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                               6-10
                                    Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
                                                                Chapter 6: Facility Diagrams
6.3.2   Example #2: Manufacturing Facility

       Figure 6-4 is an example facility diagram for a large manufacturing facility with a variety of
containers and equipment, including piping, oil-filled equipment (i.e., manufacturing equipment and
transformers), and completely buried storage tanks. As required by §112.7(a)(3), this diagram
includes all containers with a storage capacity of 55 gallons or greater. In addition to listing the
contents directly on the diagram, it includes a reference to a crosswalk that contains the volume
and content of the storage containers shown on the diagram (appended to the diagram as Table
B-3).  Also, while not required, the diagram marks the location of containers that store CWA
hazardous substances and labels those containers. EPA would further recommend that the specific
volume and specific contents of the 4,000-gallon solvent tank be included in the crosswalk.
Additionally, the diagram notes the location and content of completely buried storage tanks that,
although otherwise exempt from the SPCC rule because they meet all the technical requirements of
40 CFR part 280 or an approved state UST program under 40 CFR part 281, must still be included
in the diagram in accordance with §112.7(a)(3).

       This diagram also includes an example of how manufacturing equipment and complex
piping may be represented on a facility diagram. The diagram references the more detailed
diagrams and plans of the piping and manufacturing equipment that are available separately at the
facility. For more information on ways to represent these systems, please see Section 6.2.6, Piping
and Manufacturing Equipment, above.

       Finally, while not  required to be included in the diagram, this example facility diagram also
includes a reference to the calculation of diked storage provided in other parts of the SPCC Plan
and depicts wastewater treatment systems, secondary containment, and oil/water separators.
US. Environmental Protection Agency
6-11
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
 w
 0)
 o>

 2
 o
•si

13
 

'5.
'a.
 x

"a.

 E
 o
 o



 0)

 O.
'3
 cr
 a>
a


CO


O)

s
3
"o




s
O)
ro
f
't>
4S
jj
a.


x
I*


CO

e
3
a>
il

-------
Chapter 6: Facility Diagrams
Table B-3. Volume and contents of tanks and containers identified on the facility diagram. Please
see facility diagram to identify the areas below.
Tank/Container Volume (gallons)
Contents
Area A - Raw Material Bulk Storage
Tankl
Tank 2
TankS
Tank 4
TankS
TankS
TankS
4,000
4,000
20,000
20,000
20,000
6,000
40,000
Product A- #2 fuel oil
Product A - #2 fuel oil
Product B- #6 fuel oil
Product B- #6 fuel oil
Product B - #6 fuel oil
Product C - Kerosene
Solvent - Toluene
Area B - Finished Product Bulk Storage
Tank 6
Tank?
Area C - Electrical Equipment
Transformer E1
Transformer E2
Area D
Liquid Product Accumulation
Tank
20,000
20,000
235
235
10,000
Product D - proprietary oil
Product D - proprietary oil
Silicon-based dielectric fluid
Silicon-based dielectric fluid
Product D - proprietary oil
Process Area
Primary Reactor
Distillation
Direct Contact Cooling
Stripping
Pump/Tank
Condenser Liquifier
Underground Storage Tanks
Tank 9 (otherwise exempt
from SPCC requirements)
Tank 1 0 (otherwise exempt
from SPCC requirements)
Tank 1 1
Rev. 04/21/05
500
500
500
500
300
500
8,000
8,000
2,000
intermediate oil product
intermediate oil product
intermediate oil product
intermediate oil product
intermediate oil product
intermediate oil product
gasoline
gasoline
heating oil
6.3.3  Example #3: Oil Production Facility

       Figure 6-5 is an example facility diagram for a small oil production facility with two extraction
wells and a production tank battery. As required by §112.7(a)(3), this diagram includes all
containers with a storage capacity of 55 gallons or greater and transfer areas. Because the facility
has a relatively large footprint, the direction of flow is best displayed on a separate figure that shows
the general location of the site relative to receiving waterbodies (Figure 6-6).
US. Environmental Protection Agency
6-13
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
Figure 6-5. Example facility diagram for a production facility.
                                          Clearwater Oil Company
                                     Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility
                                                  Facility Diagram
                                                   Rev. 11/12'02
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
6-14
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
                                                                 Chapter 6: Facility Diagrams
                                                                                  
-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
6.4   Review of a Facility Diagram

6.4.1   Documentation by Owner/Operator

       By certifying an SPCC Plan, a PE attests that he/she is familiar with the requirements of 40
CFR part 112, that the Plan has been prepared in accordance with good engineering practice,
following the requirements of 40 CFR part 112, that the Plan is adequate for the facility, and that he
or his agent visited the facility.  Thus, if an SPCC Plan is certified by a PE and the facility diagram is
consistent with the rule requirements, it will most likely be considered acceptable by regional
inspectors. However, if the diagram does not meet these standards of common sense, the facility
design has changed, the supporting drawings for a simplified diagram are not available at the
facility, or the diagram appears to be inadequate for the facility, appropriate follow-up action may be
warranted. This may include a request for more information or a Plan amendment in accordance
with§112.4(d).

6.4.2   Role of the EPA Inspector

       The inspector should verify that the diagram accurately represents the facility layout and
provides sufficient detail as outlined in §112.7(a)(3), and use it as a guide for the containers and
piping inspected during the site visit.

       The EPA inspector should verify that the diagram included in the Plan includes:

             Location and contents of each container (except those below the de minimis
             container size of 55 gallons as described in Section 6.2.3, above).
       •      Completely buried tanks, including those that are otherwise exempt from the SPCC
             ruleby§112.1(d)(4).
             All transfer stations and connecting pipes (allowing the flexibility as described  in
             Section 6.2.6, above).

       Although EPA generally stated in  both the preamble of the 2002 SPCC rule (67 FR 47097)
and in §112.7(a)(3) that all facility transfer stations and connecting pipes that handle oil must be
included in the diagram, it is reasonable to allow flexibility on the method of depicting concentrated
areas of piping and manufacturing equipment on the facility diagram. These areas may be
represented in a more simplified manner, as long as more detailed diagrams (such as blueprints,
engineering diagrams, or process charts) are available at the facility. The inspector may ask to
review more detailed diagrams of piping and manufacturing equipment if further information is
needed during a site inspection.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
6-16
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
                                               Chapter 7: Inspection, Evaluation, and Testing
                 INSPECTION, EVALUATION, AND TESTING
7.1    Introduction
       Regularly scheduled inspections, evaluations, and testing by qualified personnel are critical
parts of discharge prevention. Their purpose is to prevent, predict, and readily detect discharges.
They are conducted not only on containers, but also on associated piping, valves, and
appurtenances, and on other equipment and components that could be a source or cause of an oil
release. Activities may involve one or more of the following: an external visual inspection of
containers, piping, valves, appurtenances, foundations, and supports; a non-destructive shell test to
evaluate integrity of certain containers; and additional evaluations,  as needed, to assess the
equipment's fitness for continued service.  The type of activity and  its scope will depend on the
exercise of good engineering practice; not every action will necessarily be applicable to every
facility and container, and additional inspections may be required in some cases.  An inspection,
evaluation, and testing program that complies with SPCC requirements should specify the
procedures, schedule/frequency,  types of equipment covered, person(s) conducting the activities,
recordkeeping practices,  and other elements as outlined in this chapter.

       The remainder of this chapter is organized as follows:

       •      Section 7.2 provides an overview of the SPCC inspection, evaluation, and testing
             requirements.
       •      Section 7.3 discusses specific cases, including the  use of environmentally
             equivalent measures.
             Section 7.4 discusses the role of the EPA inspector in reviewing a facility's
             compliance with the rule's inspection, evaluation, and testing requirements.
             Section 7.5 summarizes industry standards, code requirements, and recommended
             practices (RPs) that apply to different types of equipment.

7.2   Inspection, Evaluation, and Testing under the SPCC Rule

       Various provisions of the SPCC rule relate to the inspection, evaluation, and testing of
containers, associated piping, and other oil-containing equipment.  Different requirements apply to
different types of equipment and to different types of facilities. The requirements are generally
aimed at preventing discharges of oil caused by leaks, brittle fracture, or other forms of container
failure by ensuring that containers used to store oil have the necessary physical integrity for
continued oil storage. The requirements are also aimed at detecting container failures (such as
small pinhole leaks) before they can become significant and result  in a discharge as described in
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
7-1
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
7.2.1  Summary of Inspection and Integrity Testing Requirements

       Table 7-1 summarizes the provisions that apply to different types of equipment and facilities.
Some inspection and testing provisions apply to bulk storage containers at onshore facilities (other
than production facilities).  Inspection and/or testing requirements also apply to other components
of a facility that might cause a discharge (such as vehicle drains, foundations, or other equipment or
devices). Other inspection requirements also apply to oil production facilities. In addition,
inspection, evaluation, and testing requirements are required under certain circumstances, such as
when an aboveground field-constructed container undergoes repairs, alterations, or a change in
service that may affect its potential for a brittle fracture or other catastrophe,  or in cases where
secondary containment for bulk storage containers is  impracticable (§112.7(d), as described in
Chapter 4 of this document.)  Facility owners and operators must also maintain corresponding
records to demonstrate compliance {§§112.8{c)(6), 112.8(d)(4), 112.9(b)(2),  112.9(c)(3), and
112.9{d)(1) and (2)) per §112.7(e).
Table 7-1. Summary of SPCC inspection, evaluation, testing, and maintenance program provisions.
 Facility Component I   Section(s)
                 Action
               Method, Circumstance, and Required Action
                         General Requirements Applicable to All Facilities
 Bulk storage with no ; 112.7(d)
 secondary
 containment and for
 which an
 impracticability
 determination has
 been made
 Valves and piping
 associated with bulk
 storage containers
 with no secondary
 containment and for
 which an
 impracticability
 determination has
 been made
               Test
112.7(d)
Test
            I ntegrity testing.1  Periodically.
            However, because there is no secondary containment,
            good engineering practice may suggest more frequent
            testing than would otherwise be scheduled.
Integrity and leak testing of valves and piping
associated with containers that have no secondary
containment as described in §112.7(c).  Periodically.
  1 Integrity testing is any means to measure the strength (structural soundness) of a container shell, bottom, and/or
  floor to contain oil, and may include leak testing to determine whether the container will discharge oil.  Integrity testing
  is a necessary component of any good oil discharge prevention plan. It will help to prevent discharges by testing the
  strength and imperviousness of containers, ensuring they are suitable for continued service under current and
  anticipated operating conditions (e.g., product, temperature, pressure). Testing may also help facilities determine
  whether corrosion has reached a point where repairs or replacement of the container is needed, and thus avoid
  unplanned interruptions in facility operations. (67 FR 47120)
US. Environmental Protection Agency
                         7-2
                                     Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
                                                     Chapter 7: Inspection, Evaluation, and Testing
 Facility Component

 Recordkeeping
 requirement
  Section(s)   j   Action
112.7(e)
                                    Record
   Method, Circumstance, and Required Action
Keep written procedures and a signed record of
inspections and tests for a period of three years.2
Records kept under usual and customary business
practices will suffice.  For all actions.
Lowermost drain and  112.7(h)(3)
all outlets of tank car
or tank truck

Field-constructed
aboveground
container
                                     Inspect
                                     Evaluate
                            Visually inspect. Prior to filling and departure of tank
                            car or tank truck.
                            Evaluate potential for brittle fracture or other
                            catastrophic failure.  When the container undergoes a
                            repair, alteration, reconstruction or a change in service
                            that might affect the risk of a discharge or failure due
                            to brittle fracture or other catastrophe, or has
                           ! discharged oil or failed due to brittle fracture failure or
                            other catastrophe.  Based on the results of this
                            evaluation, take appropriate action.
              Subpart B:  Onshore Facilities - Petroleum and Other Non-Petroleum Oils
 Subpart C:  Onshore Facilities (Excluding Production Facilities) - Animal Fats and Vegetable Oils
 Diked areas
                             Onshore Facilities (Excluding Production)
                                    Inspect
                      112.8(b)(2)or
                      &
                      112.8{c)(10)or
                            Visually inspect content for presence of oil. Prior to
                            draining. You must promptly remove any
                            accumulations of oil in diked areas.
 Buried metallic
 storage tank
 installed on or after
 January 10, 1974
112.8{c)(4)or
                                    Test
 Aboveground bulk
 storage container
 Aboveground bulk
 storage container
                     112.8(c)(6}or
               Test
112.8(c)(6)or  : Inspect
Leak test. Regularly.
                      &
                      112.8{c)(10)or
Test container integrity. Combine visual inspection
with another testing technique (such as non-
destructive shell testing).  Following a regular
schedule and whenever material repairs are made.

Inspect outside of container for signs of deterioration
and discharges.  Frequently.  Promptly correct visible
discharges which result in a loss of oil from the
container, including but not limited to seams, gaskets,
piping, pumps, valves, rivets, and bolts.
  2 Certain industry standards require recordkeeping beyond three years.
US. Environmental Protection Agency
                          7-3
                                                                          Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
 Facility Component
 Bulk storage
 container supports
 and foundation
 Diked area
 Steam return and
 exhaust lines
 Liquid level sensing
 devices
 Effluent treatment
 facilities
  Section(s)
112.8(c){6)or
112.8(c)(6)or
                     &
                     112.8(c)(10) or
                 Action
               Inspect
    Method, Circumstance, and Required Action
!
 Inspect container's supports and foundations.
 Following a regular schedule and whenever material
 repairs are made.
               Inspect
 Inspect for signs of deterioration, discharges, or
 accumulation of oil inside diked areas.  Frequently.
 You must promptly remove any accumulations of oil in
 diked areas.
112.8(c)(7)or  i Monitor
112.8(c)(8)(v)  |  Test
or
112.8(c)(9)or
 Buried piping
               Observe
112.8{d)(1)or :  Inspect
 Buried piping

 All aboveground
 valves, piping, and
 appurtenances
112.8(d)(4)or i  Test
112.8(d)(4)or
               Inspect
                           Monitor for contamination from internal heating coils.
                           On an ongoing basis.
                           Test for proper operation. Regularly.
 Detect possible system upsets that could cause a
 discharge. Frequently.	
                           Inspect for deterioration.  Whenever a sect/on of
                           buried line is exposed for any reason. If you find
                           corrosion damage, you must undertake additional
                           examination and corrective action as indicated by the
                           magnitude of the damage.
 Integrity and leak testing. At the time of installation,
 modification, construction, relocation, or replacement.

 During the inspection, assess general condition of
 items, such as flange joints, expansion joints, valve
 glands and bodies, catch pans, pipeline supports,
 locking of valves, and metal surfaces. Regularly.
                                   Onshore Production Facilities
 Diked area
 Field drainage
 systems, oil traps,
 sumps, and
 skimmers
 Aboveground
 containers
112.9{b)(2)
               Inspect
               Inspect
                           Visually inspect content. Prior to draining. You must
                           remove accumulated oil on the rainwater and return it
                           to storage or dispose of it in accordance with legally
                           approved methods.
112.9{c}(3)
               Inspect
 Detect accumulation of oil that may have resulted from
 any small discharge. Inspect at regularly scheduled
 intervals. You must promptly remove any
 accumulations of oil.
 Visually inspect to assess deterioration and
 maintenance needs.  Periodically and on a regular
 schedule.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                          7-4
                                                    Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
                                                Chapter 7: Inspection, Evaluation, and Testing
Facility Component
Foundations or
supports of each
container that is on or
above the surface of
the ground
All aboveground
valves and piping
Section(s)
112.9(c)(3)




112.9(d)(1)

associated with
transfer operations
Action Method, Circumstance, and Required Action
Inspect Visually inspect to assess deterioration and
maintenance needs. Periodically and on a regular
schedule.


Inspect




Saltwater disposal
112.9(d)(2)
facilities
j
Inspect

During the inspection, assess general condition of
flange joints, valve glands and bodies, drip pans, pipe
supports, pumping well polish rod stuffing boxes,
bleeder and gauge valves, and other such items.
Periodically and on a regular schedule.
Inspect to detect possible system upsets capable of
causing a discharge. Often, particularly following a
, sudden change in atmospheric temperature.
Offshore Oil Drilling, Production, and Workover Facilities
Flowlines




Sump system (liquid
112.9(d)(3)




112.11(c)
Inspect




Inspect
removal system and ; ! and Test
pump start-up device)
Pollution prevention
equipment and
systems





Sub-marine piping

112.11(h)&(i)







112.11(p)


Inspect
and Test


Have a program of flowline maintenance to prevent
discharges from each flowline. Each program may
have its own specific and individual inspection, testing,
and/or evaluation requirements and frequencies as
determined by the PE.
Use preventive maintenance inspection and testing
program to ensure reliable operation. Regularly
scheduled.
Prepare, maintain, and conduct testing and inspection
of the pollution prevention equipment and systems
commensurate with the complexity, conditions, and
circumstances of the facility and any other appropriate
regulations. You must use simulated discharges for



Inspect
and Test
testing and inspecting human and equipment pollution
control and countermeasure systems. On a schedulec
periodic basis.
Inspect and test for good operating conditions and for
failures. Periodically and according to a schedule.
       The SPCC rule is a performance-based regulation. Since each facility may present unique
characteristics and since methodologies may evolve as new technologies are developed, the rule
does not prescribe a specific frequency or methodology to perform the required inspections,
evaluations, and tests.  Instead, it relies on the use of good engineering practice, based on the
professional judgement of the Professional Engineer (PE) who certifies the SPCC Plan considering
industry standards. In addition, recommended practices, safety considerations, and requirements
of other federal, state, or local regulations may be considered in the development and PE
certification of the SPCC Plan. Section 112.3(d) specifically states that the PE certification of a
Plan attests that "procedures for required inspections and testing have been established." Thus, in
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
7-5
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
certifying an SPCC Plan, a PE is also certifying that the inspection program it describes is
appropriate for the facility and is consistent with good engineering practice. Section 112.3(d) also
states that the Plan must be prepared in accordance with good engineering practice, including
consideration of applicable industry standards, and with the requirements of 40 CFR part 112.

       The preamble to the 2002 revised SPCC rule lists examples of industry standards and
recommended practices that may be relevant to determining what constitutes good engineering
practice for various rule provisions. These industry standards are summarized in Tables 7-2 and 7-
3 (Section 7.2.6) and further discussed in Section 7.5. It is important to note, however, that the
industry standards may be more specific and more stringent than the requirements in the SPCC
rule. For example, EPA does not prescribe a particular schedule for testing. This is because "good
engineering practice" and relevant industry standards change over time. In addition, site-specific
conditions at an SPCC-regulated facility play a significant role in the development of appropriate
inspections and tests and the associated schedule for these activities.  For example, the American
Petroleum Institute (API) Standard 653, "Tank Inspection, Repair, Alteration, and Reconstruction,"
includes a cap on the maximum interval between external and internal inspections, and provides
specific criteria for alternative inspection intervals based  on the calculated corrosion rate. API 653
also provides an internal inspection interval when the corrosion rates are not known. Similarly, the
Steel Tank Institute (STI) Standard SP-001, 3rd Edition, provides specific intervals for external and
internal inspection of shop-built containers based on container size and configuration.

       Integrity testing requirements for the SPCC  rule may be replaced by environmentally
equivalent measures as allowed under  §112.7(a)(2) and  reviewed by the PE who certifies the Plan.
Chapter 3 of this guidance provides a general discussion of environmental equivalence, while
Section 7.3 discusses its particular relevance to inspection, evaluation, and testing requirements.
7.2.2  Regularly Scheduled Integrity Testing
       and Frequent Visual Inspection of
       Aboveground Bulk Storage
       Containers

       Section 112.8(c)(6) of the SPCC rule
specifies the inspection and testing
requirements for aboveground bulk storage
containers at onshore facilities that store, use, or
process petroleum oils and non-petroleum oils
(except animal fats and vegetable oils).  Section
112.12(c)(6) contains the same requirements for
facilities with animal fats and vegetable oils.

       The provision sets two distinct
requirements for aboveground bulk storage
containers:
    §§112.8(c}(6) and 112.12(c)(6)
    Test each aboveground container for integrity on
    a regular schedule, and whenever you make
    material repairs. The frequency of and type of
    testing must take into account container size and
    design (such as floating roof, skid-mounted,
    elevated, or partially buried). You must combine
    visual inspection with another testing technique
    such as hydrostatic testing, radiographic testing,
    ultrasonic testing, acoustic emissions testing, or
    another system of non-destructive shell testing.
    You must keep comparison records and you
    must also inspect the container's supports and
    foundations. In addition, you must frequently
    inspect the outside of the container for signs of
    deterioration, discharges, or accumulation of oil
    inside diked areas. Records of inspections and
    tests kept under usual and customary business
    practices will suffice for purposes of this
    paragraph.
                                                 Note: The above text is only a brief excerpt of the rule. Refer
                                                 to 40 CFR part 112 for the full text of the rule.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
7-6
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
                                                    Chapter 7: Inspection, Evaluation, and Testing
       (1)    Regularly scheduled integrity testing; and
       (2)    Frequent visual inspection of the outside of the container.

       Regularly scheduled integrity testing. The  integrity testing requirements are distinct from,
and are in addition to, the requirement to frequently inspect the outside of an aboveground storage
container ("visual inspection," see below). The integrity testing requirement applies to large (field-
constructed or field-erected) and small (shop-built)3 aboveground containers; aboveground
containers on, partially in (partially buried, bunkered, or vaulted tanks), and off the ground wherever
located; and to aboveground containers storing any type of oil.

       Generally, visual inspection alone is not sufficient to test the integrity of the container as
stated in §§112.8(c)(6) and 112.12(c}(6); it must be combined with another testing technique and
must include the container's supports and foundations.  Testing techniques include but are not
limited to:

              Hydrostatic testing;"
              Radiographic testing;
              Ultrasonic testing;
       *      Acoustic emissions testing; and
              Another system of non-destructive shell testing.

       The SPCC rule requires that integrity testing of aboveground bulk storage containers be
performed on a regular schedule, as well as when material repairs5 are made,  because such repairs
might increase the potential for oil  discharges.  As stated in the preamble to the final 2002 rule,
"Testing on a 'regular schedule' means testing per industry standards or at a frequency sufficient to
prevent discharges. Whatever schedule the PE selects must be documented in the Plan" (67 FR
47119). The frequency of integrity tests should reflect the particular conditions of the container,
such as the age, service history, original construction specifications, prior inspection results, and
the existing condition of the container. It may also consider the degree of risk of a discharge to
navigable waters and adjoining shorelines.  For example, where secondary containment is
inadequate (none provided, insufficient capacity or insufficiently impervious) and adequate
  3 According to STI SP-001, a field-erected aboveground storage tank (AST) is a welded metal AST erected on the site
  where it will be used. For the purpose of the standard, ASTs are to be inspected as field-erected ASTs if they are
  either:  (a) an AST where the nameplate indicates that it is a field-erected AST, and limited to a maximum shell height
  of 50 feet and maximum diameter of 30 feet; or (b) an AST without a nameplate that is more than 50,000 gallons and
  has a maximum shell height of 50 feet and a maximum diameter of 30 feet. A shop-fabricated AST is a welded metal
  AST fabricated in a manufacturing facility or an AST not otherwise identified as field-erected with a volume less than
  or equal to 50.000 gallons. (STI SP-001, "Standard for the Inspection of Aboveground Storage Tanks," July 2005)

  4 Hydrostatic testing is allowed per §112.8(c)(6); however, hydrotesting the container may actually result in container
  failure during the test and should be performed in accordance with industry standards and using the appropriate test
  media.

  5 Examples of material repairs include removal or replacement of the annular plate ring; replacement of the container
  bottom; jacking of a container shell; installation of a 12-inch or larger nozzle in the shell; replacement of a door sheet
  or tombstone in the shell, or other shell repair; or such repairs that might materially change the potential for oil to be
  discharged from the container.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
7-7
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
secondary containment would be impracticable, §112.7(d) requires, among other measures,
periodic integrity testing of bulk storage containers.  Given the higher potential of a discharge
reaching navigable waters or adjoining shorelines, however, the PE may decide, based on good
engineering practice, that more frequent integrity tests would be needed than for containers that
have adequate secondary containment. This approach of establishing an increased inspection
frequency for an aboveground container without secondary containment is used in the STI SP-001
standard.

       Frequent visual inspection.  There must be a frequent inspection of the outside of the
container for signs of deterioration, discharges, or accumulations of oil inside diked areas
(§112.8(c)(6)). This visual inspection is intended to be a routine walk-around. EPA expects that the
walk-around, which will occur on an ongoing routine basis, can generally be conducted by properly
trained facility personnel, as opposed to the more intensive but less frequent visual inspection
component of the non-destructive examination conducted by qualified testing/inspection personnel.
Qualifications of these personnel are outlined in tank inspection standards,  such as API 653 and
STI SP-001. A facility owner or operator can, for example, visually inspect the outside of bulk
storage containers on a daily, weekly, and/or monthly basts, and supplement this inspection with
integrity testing (see above) performed by a certified inspector, with the scope and frequency
determined by industry standards or according to a site-specific inspection program developed by
the PE.

       Oil-filled electrical, operating, and manufacturing devices or equipment are not considered
bulk storage containers; therefore, the integrity testing requirements in §§112.8(c)(6) and
112.12(c)(6) do not apply to those devices or equipment.  However, EPA recommends that even
where not specifically required by the rule, it is good engineering practice to frequently inspect the
outside of oil-filled operational, electrical, and manufacturing equipment to determine whether it
could cause a discharge. For example, in a food manufacturing process, certain containers that
contain edible oil (such as reactors, fermentors, or mixing tanks) are considered oil-filled
manufacturing equipment and are not required to undergo integrity testing.  Since a discharge as
described in §112.1(b) can occur from manufacturing, discharge discovery and thus visual
inspection procedures outlined in an SPCC Plan should include this equipment as well as other oil-
filled equipment to prevent such a discharge as part of the facility's countermeasures per
§112.7(a)(3)(iv) for discharge discovery.  Although oil-filled equipment is not subject to the integrity
testing requirements under §112.8(c)(6) or §112.12(c)(6), EPA recommends routine inspections at
least visually to detect discharges  as part  of the facility's countermeasures per §112.7(a)(3)(iv) for
discharge discovery.

7.2.3  Brittle Fracture Evaluation of Field-Constructed Aboveground Containers

       Brittle fracture is a type of structural failure in larger field-constructed aboveground steel
tanks characterized by rapid crack formation that can cause sudden tank failure. This, along with
catastrophic failures such as those resulting from lightning strikes, seismic activity, or other such
events, can cause the entire contents of a container to be discharged  to the environment. A review
of past failures due to brittle fracture shows that they typically occur (1) during an initial hydrotest,

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency         7-8                      Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
                                                   Chapter 7: Inspection, Evaluation, and Testing
(2) on the first filling in cold weather, (3) after a change to lower temperature service, or (4) after a
repair/modification.  Storage tanks with a maximum shell thickness of one-half inch or less are not
generally considered at risk for brittle fracture.6  Brittle fracture was most vividly illustrated by the
splitting and collapse of a 3.8 million gallon (120-foot diameter) tank in Floreffe, Pennsylvania,
which released approximately 750,000 gallons of oil into the Monongahela River in January  1988.
       Section 112.7(i) of the SPCC rule
requires that field-constructed aboveground
containers that have undergone a repair or
change in service that might affect the risk of a
discharge due to brittle fracture or other
catastrophe, or have had a discharge associated
with brittle fracture or other catastrophe, be
evaluated to assess the risk of such a discharge.
Unless the original design shell thickness of the
tank is less than one-half inch (see API 653,
Section 5, and STI SP-001, Appendix B),
evidence of this evaluation should be
documented in the facility's SPCC Plan.
     If a field-constructed aboveground container
     undergoes a repair, alteration, reconstruction, or
     a change in service that might affect the risk of a
     discharge or failure due to brittle fracture or
     other catastrophe, or has discharged oil or failed
     due to brittle fracture failure or other
     catastrophe, evaluate the container for risk of
     discharge or failure due to brittle fracture or
     other catastrophe, and as necessary, take
     appropriate action.

     Note: The above text is only a brief excerpt of the rule.
     Refer to 40 CFR part 112 for the full text of the SPCC rule.
       In summary, industry standards discuss methods for assessing the risk of brittle fracture
failure for a field-erected aboveground container and for performing a brittle fracture evaluation
including API 653, "Tank Inspection, Repair, Alteration, and Reconstruction," API RP 920
"Prevention of Brittle Fracture of Pressure Vessels," and API RP 579, "Fitness-for-Service."  These
standards include a decision tree or flowchart for use by the owner/operator and PE in assessing
the risk of brittle fracture. STI SP-001 also  addresses brittle fracture failures for smaller diameter
field-erected tanks with a wall thickness less than one-half inch.

7.2.4  Inspections of Piping

       For onshore facilities, the SPCC rule specifies the following inspection and testing
requirements for piping.  Buried piping at non-production facilities that has been installed or
replaced on or after August 16, 2002, must  have a protective wrapping and coating and be
protected from corrosion cathodically or by  other means, as per §§112.8(d)(1) and 112.12(d)(1).
Any exposed line must be inspected for deterioration, and, if corrosion damage is found, additional
inspection or corrective action must be taken as needed.

       Aboveground piping, valves, and appurtenances at non-production facilities must be
regularly inspected, as per §§112.8(d)(4) and 112.12(d)(4) and in accordance with industry
  6 Mclaughlin, James E. 1991. "Preventing Brittle Fracture of Aboveground Storage Tanks - Basis for the Approach
  Incorporated into API 653." Case Studies: Sessions III and IV of the IIW Conference: Fitness for Purpose of Welded
  Structures.  October 23-24, 1991, Key Biscayne, Florida, USA.  Cosponsored by the American Welding Society,
  Welding Research Institute, Welding Institute of Canada, and International Institute of Welding. Published by the
  American Welding Society, Miami, Florida. Pages 90-110.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
7-9
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
standards.  Buried piping must be integrity and leak tested at the time of installation, modification,
construction, relocation, or replacement.

       Aboveground valves and piping associated with transfer operations at production facilities
must be inspected periodically and on a regular schedule, as per §112.9(d)(1) and in accordance
with industry standards. A program of flowline maintenance is required by §112.9(d)(3) and is
described in the following section of this document.

       For offshore facilities, §112.11 (n) specifies that all piping appurtenant to the facility must be
protected from corrosion, such as with protective coatings or cathodic protection,  Section 112.11 (p)
requires that sub-marine piping appurtenant to the facility be maintained in good operating condition
at all times, and that such piping be inspected or tested for failures periodically and according to a
schedule.

       In addition, if the owner/operator determines that these required measures are not
practicable, periodic integrity and leak testing of valves and piping must be conducted, as per
§112.7(d).

7.2.5   Flowiine Maintenance

       The objective of the SPCC flowline maintenance program requirement (§112.9{d)(3)) is to
help prevent oil discharges from production flowlines, e.g., the piping that extends from the
pump/well head to the production tank battery. Common causes of such discharges include
mechanical damage (i.e., impact, rupture) and corrosion. A flowline  maintenance  program aims to
manage the oil production operations in a manner that reduces the potential for a discharge. It
usually combines careful configuration, inspection, and ongoing maintenance of flowlines and
associated equipment to prevent and mitigate a potential discharge.  EPA recommends that the
scope of a flowline maintenance program include periodic examinations, corrosion protection,
flowline replacement, and adequate records, as appropriate. EPA suggests that facility
owner/operators conduct inspections either according to industry standards or at a frequency
sufficient to prevent a discharge as described  in §112.1{b).  EPA is aware that API attempted to
develop an  industry standard for flowline maintenance, but the standard has not been finalized.
However, according to practices recommended by industry groups, such as API, a comprehensive
piping (flowline) program should include the following elements:

             Prevention measures that avert the discharge of fluids from  primary containment;
             Detection measures that identify a discharge or potential for a discharge;
             Protection measures that minimize the impact of a discharge; and
             Remediation measures that mitigate discharge impacts by relying on limited or
             expedited cleanup.

If a standard for flowline maintenance is developed, inspectors are encouraged to review this
standard. At present, the details below serve to guide the inspector  in reviewing the scope of a
flowline maintenance program.  If an impracticability determination under §112.7(d) is made for

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency        7-10                     Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
                                                Chapter 7: Inspection, Evaluation, and Testing
flowlines for secondary containment required by §112.7(c), EPA inspectors should extensively
review the adequacy of the flow/line maintenance program along with the contingency plan (67 FR
47078).

       A flowline maintenance program should ensure that flowlines, associated equipment, and
safety devices are kept in good condition and would operate as designed in the event of a
discharge.  The PE certifying the Plan will typically establish the scope and frequency of
inspections, tests, and preventive maintenance based on industry standards, manufacturer's
recommendations, and other such sources of good engineering practice.

       General Spill Prevention

       The maintenance program should ensure that the equipment is configured and operated to
prevent discharges.  Adequate supports and signage should be maintained to help prevent
mechanical damage to aboveground flowlines.  Finally, the maintenance program should ensure
the proper operation of safety devices such as low-pressure sensors and safety shut-down valves
to mitigate the extent of a spill in the event of a flowline rupture.

       Corrosion Protection

       Internal corrosion may be  prevented through the use of compatible materials (PVC,
fiberglass, coatings) or by the addition of corrosion inhibitors.  External corrosion may be prevented
through the use of compatible materials, coatings/wrappings, and/or cathodic protection.

       Periodic Examination

       Visual observation of the flowlines by facility personnel should be included as part of any
flowline maintenance program and is of paramount importance for those facilities with flowlines that
have no secondary containment and rely on rapid spill detection to implement a contingency plan in
a timely manner. Facility personnel may "walk the flowlines" or perform  aerial fly-overs, if they are
located aboveground, to detect any evidence of leakage. The visual inspection should cover the
piping, flange joints, valves, drip pans, and supports, and look for signs of corrosion, deterioration,
leakage, malfunction, and other problems that could lead to a discharge. The frequency of
inspections can vary according to their scope, the presence of secondary containment, and the
detection capability needed to ensure prompt implementation of a contingency plan (if no
containment is present), and may include daily, monthly, quarterly, or annual inspections.  Regular
visual inspection may be supplemented by periodic integrity testing  using non-destructive
evaluation methods, such as ultrasonic or other techniques to determine remaining wall thickness,
or hydrostatic testing at a  pressure above normal operating  pressure.  This guidance document
refers to some relevant industry standards that describe methods used to test the integrity of piping,
such as API 570 and ASME B31.4.

       Flowline Replacement and Recordkeeping
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
7-11
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
       The facility's SPCC Plan should describe how the flowlines are configured, monitored, and
maintained to prevent discharges.  The program is to be implemented in the field, and facility
personnel responsible for the maintenance of the equipment should be aware of the flowline
locations and be familiar with maintenance procedures, including replacement of damaged and/or
leaking flowlines.  Records of inspections and tests kept under usual and customary business
practices should be prepared and made available for review, as required by the rule (§112.7(e)).

       If an impracticability determination is made for flowlines, the flowline maintenance program
should be shown to be adequate along with the contingency plan (67 FR 47078).

7.2.6   Role of Industry Standards and Recommended Practices in Meeting SPCC
       Requirements

       The SPCC rule does not require the use of a specific industry standard for conducting
inspections, evaluations, and integrity testing of bulk storage containers and other equipment at the
facility. Rather, the rule provides flexibility in the facility owner/operator's implementation of the
requirement, consistent with good engineering practice, as reviewed by the PE certifying the Plan.

       To develop an appropriate inspection, evaluation, and testing program for an SPCC-
regulated facility, the  PE must consider applicable industry standards (§112.3(d)(1)(iii)). If the
facility owner or operator uses a specific standard to comply with SPCC requirements, the standard
should be referenced in the Plan.  Where no specific and general industry standard exists to inform
the determination of what constitutes good engineering practice for a particular inspection or testing
requirement, the PE should consider the manufacturer's specifications and  instructions for the
proper use and maintenance of the equipment, appurtenance, or container. If neither a specific and
objective industry standard nor a specific and objective manufacturer's instruction apply, the PE
may also call upon his/her professional experience to develop site-specific inspection and testing
requirements for the facility or equipment as per §112.3(d)(1)(iv). The inspection and testing
program must be documented in the Plan (§112.7(e)). A checklist is provided as Table 7-5 at the
end of this chapter to assist inspectors in reviewing the relevant industry standards based on the
equipment observed at an SPCC-regulated facility.

       In the preamble to the 2002 SPCC rule, EPA provides examples of industry standards that
may constitute good engineering practice for assessing the integrity of different types of containers
for oil storage (67 FR 47120). Compliance with other industry standards and federal requirements
may also meet SPCC inspection, evaluation, and testing requirements. The U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT) regulates containers used to transport hazardous materials, including certain
oil products. For example, mobile/portable containers that leave a facility are subject to the DOT
construction and continuing qualification and maintenance requirements (49 CFR part 178 and
49 CFR part 180).  These DOT  requirements may be used by the facility owner and operator and by
the certifying PE as references of good engineering practice for assessing the fitness for service of
mobile/portable containers.
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency        7-12                     Version 1.0.11 /28/2005

-------
                                                Chapter 7: Inspection, Evaluation, and Testing
       Industry standards typically apply to containers built according to a specified design (API
653, for example, applies to tanks constructed in accordance with API 650 or API 12C); the
standards describe the scope, frequency, and methods for evaluating the suitability of the
containers for continued service. This assessment usually considers performance relative to
specified minimum criteria, such as ability to maintain pressure or remaining shell thickness. The
integrity testing is usually performed by inspectors licensed by the standard-setting organizations
(e.g., American Petroleum Institute, Steel Tank Institute).

       Table 7-2 summarizes key elements of industry standards (and recommended practices)
commonly used for testing aboveground storage tanks  (ASTs). Table 7-3 summarizes key
elements of standards (and recommended practices) used for testing piping and other equipment.
Section 7.5 of this chapter provides a more detailed description of the standards listed in the tables.
Other industry standards exist for specific equipment or purposes. Many of these are cross-
referenced in API 653, including publications and standards from other organizations such as the
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), the American Society for Non-Destructive
Testing (ASNT), and the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). Other organizations,
such as the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), the National Association of Corrosion
Engineers (NACE), and the Underwriters Laboratory (UL), also provide critical information on all
container types and appurtenances.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
7-13
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
Table 7-2. Summary of industry standards and recommended practices (RP) for ASTs.

Equipment
covered





Scope









Inspection
interval







API 653
Field-fabricated,
welded, or riveted
ASTs operating at
atmospheric
pressure and built
according to API
650.
Inspection and
design; fitness for
service; risk.







Certified
inspections:
Dependent on
tank's service
history. Intervals
from 5 to 20 years.
Owner inspections:
monthly.

I
Inspection i Certified inspector,
performed by



Applicable
section of this
document
tank owner.



Section 7. 5.1


STI SP-001 API RP 575
ASTs including Atmospheric and
shop-fabricated low-pressure ASTs.
and field-erected
tanks and portable
containers and
containment
systems.
Determined by the Inspection and
type of material repair of tanks.
stored within the
tank and the
operating
temperature.
Inspection of tanks
by the owner/
operator and
certified inspectors.
API RP 12R1
Atmospheric ASTs
employed in oil and
gas production,
treating, and
processing.


Setting, connecting,
maintaining,
operating, inspecting,
and repairing tanks.






Certified Same as API 653. j Scheduled and
inspections:
Inspection intervals
and scope based
on tank size and
configuration.

Owner inspections:
unscheduled internal
and external
inspections
conducted as per
Table 1 of the
Recommended
Practice.
monthly, quarterly, i
and yearly.
Certified inspector, Same as API 653
either by API or
STI.


Section 7.5.2 Section 7.5.3


Competent person or
qualified inspector, as
defined in
recommended
practice.
Section 7.5.4


US. Environmental Protection Agency
7-14
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
                                                Chapter 7: Inspection, Evaluation, and Testing
Table 7-3.  Summary of industry standards and recommended practices (RP) for piping, valves,
and appurtenances.
API 570
Equip-
ment
covered



Scope





Inspection
interval





Inspection
performed
by

Applicable
section of
this
document
In-service
aboveg round
and buried
metallic piping


Inspection,
repair,
alteration, and
rerating
procedures

Based on
likelihood and
consequence
of failure ("risk-
based"),
maximum of
10 years
Certified piping
inspector


Section 7.5.5



API RP 574
Piping, tubing,
valves and
fittings in
petroleum
refineries and
chemical plants
Inspection
practices




Based on five
factors





Authorized
piping inspector


Section 7.5.6



API RP 1110
Liquid
petroleum
pipelines
(pressure
testing)

Procedures,
equipment, and
factors to
consider during
pressure testing

-






-



Section 7.5.7



ASMEB31.3
Process piping
for oil,
petrochemical,
and chemical
processes

Minimum safety
requirements
for design,
examination,
and testing

As part of
quality control
function




Qualified
Inspector, as
defined in
standard
Section 7.5.10



ASMEB31.4
Pressure piping
for liquid
hydrocarbons
and other
liquids

Safe design,
construction,
inspection,
testing,
operation, and
maintenance
Not specified






Qualified
Inspector, as
defined in
standard
Section 7.5.11



"-" means that the standard provides no specific information for the element listed.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
7-15
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
7.3   Specific Circumstances

       Integrity testing (a combination of visual inspection and another testing technique) is
required for all aboveground bulk storage containers located at onshore facilities (except production
facilities), unless the facility owner/operator implements an environmentally equivalent method (as
described in Chapter 3 and in Section 7.3.4, below) and documents the deviation in the SPCC Plan.
Typically, visual inspection is combined with non-destructive shell testing in order to adequately
assess the  container condition. EPA has  indicated that visual inspection alone may provide
equivalent environmental protection in some cases, if certain conditions are met and if the
inspections are conducted  at appropriate time intervals (see Section 7.3.4 of this document) in
accordance with  good engineering practice. Therefore, if the Plan calls for visual inspection alone
in accordance with an industry standard, then the Plan must discuss the reason for the
nonconformance with §112.8(c){6) or §112.12(c)(6) and comply with the environmental equivalence
provision in §112.7(a)(2).

       Some facilities may not have performed integrity testing of their tanks. In this case,
developing  an appropriate  integrity testing program will require assessing baseline conditions for
these tanks. This "baseline" will provide information on the condition of the tank shell, and the rate
of change in condition due to corrosion or other factors, in order to establish a regular inspection
schedule. Section 112.7 requires that if any facilities, procedures, methods, or equipment are not
yet fully operational, the SPCC Plan must explain the details of installation and operational start-up;
this applies to the inspection and testing programs required by the rule. For all types of facilities,
the PE is responsible for making the final  determination on the scope and frequency of testing when
certifying that an SPCC Plan is consistent with good engineering  practice and is appropriate for the
facility.

       This section provides guidance on integrity testing for the  following circumstances the
inspector may encounter at an SPCC-regulated facility:

             Aboveground bulk storage containers for which the baseline condition is known;
             Aboveg round bulk storage containers for which the baseline condition  is nor known;
             Deviation from integrity testing  requirements based on environmental equivalence;
             and
             Environmental equivalence scenarios for shop-built containers.

       This is not a comprehensive list of circumstances.  For these and other cases, the PE may
recommend alternative approaches.

7.3.1   Aboveground Bulk Storage Container for Which the Baseline Condition Is Known

       In the case of tanks for which the baseline condition is known (e.g., the shell thickness and
corrosion rates are known), the inspection and testing schedule should typically occur at a scope
and frequency based on industry standards (or the equivalent developed by a PE for the

L/.S. Environmental Protection Agency         7-16                     Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
                                                 Chapter 7: Inspection, Evaluation, and Testing
site-specific SPCC Plan) per §112.8(c)(6) or §112.12(c)(6).  There is an advantage to knowing the
baseline condition of a tank, particularly if the remaining wall thickness and the corrosion rate are
known.  Only when the baseline is known can an inspection and testing program be established on
a regular schedule.  The inspection interval should be identified consistent with specific intervals
per industry standards or should be based on the corrosion rate and expected remaining life of the
container. This inspection interval must be documented in the Plan in accordance with §§112.3(d),
112.7(6), 112.8{c){6), and 112.12(c){6). API 653 is an example of an industry standard that directs
the owner/operator to consider the remaining wall thickness and the established corrosion rate to
determine an inspection interval for external and internal inspections and testing.

       Inspection and testing standards may require visual inspection of both the exterior and
interior of the container, and the use of another method of non-destructive evaluation depending on
the type and configuration of the container. Inspectors should note that the scope and frequency of
inspections and tests for shop-built tanks and field-erected tanks at an SPCC-regulated facility may
vary due to the age of the tank, the configuration, and the applicable industry standard used as the
reference. For example, the PE may choose to develop an inspection and testing program for the
facility's shop-built tanks in accordance with STI SP-001, and may elect to develop the program for
the facility's field-erected tanks in accordance with API 653. As an alternative example, the PE may
elect to develop a program in accordance with STI SP-001 for the facility's shop-built tanks and for
its field-erected tanks of a certain capacity and size. For containers at facilities storing animal fats
and vegetable oils, the PE may elect to develop a hybrid testing program building upon elements of
both API 653 and STI SP-001 or only one of the standards.

7.3.2   Aboveground Bulk Storage Container for Which the Baseline Condition Is Not Known

       For a facility to comply with the requirement for integrity testing of containers on a regular
schedule (§§112.8(c)(6) and 112.12(c)(6)), a baseline condition for each container is necessary to
establish inspection intervals. The PE must attest that procedures for required inspections and
testing have been established (§112.3{d)(1){iv)). However, for shop-built and field-erected
containers for which construction history and wall and/or bottom plate thickness baselines are not
known, a regular integrity testing program cannot be established. Instead, the PE must describe in
the SPCC Plan an interim schedule (in accordance with the introductory paragraph of §112.7) that
allows the facility to gather the baseline data to establish a regular schedule of integrity testing in
accordance with §§112.8(c)(6) and 112.12(c)(6). It should be noted that the introductory paragraph
of §112.7 of the SPCC rule allows for the Plan to describe procedures, methods, or equipment that
are not yet operational, and include a discussion of the details.

       When a container has no prior inspection history or baseline information, the implementation
of the baseline inspection program is important in order to assess the container's "suitability for
continued service." Both API 653 and STI SP-001 include details on how to assess a container's
suitability for continued service.  In some cases, where baseline information is not known, the
testing program may include two data collection periods to establish a baseline of shell thickness
and corrosion rate in order to develop the next inspection  interval (or "regular" schedule), or an
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
7-17
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
alternative inspection schedule established by the PE in accordance with good engineering
practice.

       When no baseline information is available for a container, the PE may schedule visual
inspection and another testing technique within the first five-year review cycle of the SPCC Plan in
order to establish a regular integrity testing schedule based on current container conditions. In this
example, the review cycle would begin on the revised rule implementation deadline of August 18,
2006, so the first (baseline) container inspection and integrity test would be completed by August
18,2011.  In the case of a tank that is newly built, construction data (e.g., as-built drawings and/or
manufacturers cut-sheets) may typically be used as an initial datum point to establish wall
thicknesses and would be included in the established procedures for inspection and testing.

       The implementation, particularly in establishing inspection priorities, of the testing program
should be in accordance with good engineering practice and include consideration of industry
standards (§112.3(d)), as discussed in this document. For instance, special consideration may be
discussed in the Plan for containers for which the age and existing condition is not known (no
baseline information exists).  For example, older tanks or tanks in more demanding service may be
identified as high-priority tanks for inspection, versus tanks for which the baseline information is

Figure 7-1. Example baselining plan to determine the integrity testing and inspection  schedule.
Scenario:
Facility has three aboveground atmospheric, mild-carbon steel tanks of different ages and conditions. Some have prior
inspection histories; others have never been inspected. Although there is limited history available for tank construction,
the tanks are presumed to be field-erected tanks and to each have 1 00,000 gallons in storage capacity. What is an
appropriate inspection schedule for these tanks? API 653 is the referenced inspection standard.
Additional information:
API 653 recommends a formal visual inspection every 5 years or % of corrosion rate, whichever is less, and a
non-destructive shell test (UT) within 1 5 years or Vi of corrosion rate, whichever is less. If corrosion rates are not known, the
maximum interval is 5 years. An internal inspection of the floor of the tank is to be done based on corrosion rates. If the
corrosion rate is known, the interval cannot exceed 20 years. If the corrosion rate is unknown, the interval cannot exceed 10
years.
Determination of Inspection schedule:

Tankl
Tank 2
Tank 3
Construction Date
unknown
2001
1984
Last Inspection
none
none
1994
Next Inspection (External)
formal visual and shell test
within first five-year Plan review
cycle
2006 for both visual inspection
and non-destructive shell test
1 999 & 2004 formal visual
2009 non-destructive shell test
both intervals may be
decreased based on calculated
corrosion rates from the 1994
inspection.
Next Inspection (Internal)
external inspection within first
five-year Plan review cycle
2011 (i.e., not to exceed 10
years when corrosion rate of
tank bottom is not known)
2014 or less based on
calculated corrosion rates
from the 1994 inspection
Note: Actual inspection schedule is ultimately an engineering determination made by the PE, based on industry standards,
and is certified in the Plan.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
7-18
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
                                                 Chapter 7: Inspection, Evaluation, and Testing
known.

       An example baselining plan is presented in Figure 7-1.  The example presents a simple
scenario and is only provided as an illustration of some of the factors that may be considered when
determining a schedule to initiate inspections of bulk storage containers.

7.3.3  Deviation from Integrity Testing Requirements Based on Environmental Equivalence

       Chapter 3 of this document describes the flexibility provided in the SPCC rule through the
use of environmental equivalent measures, per §112.7(a)(2). The discussion below describes
examples of measures that facility owners and operators can use to deviate from inspection and
testing requirements, while providing equivalent environmental protection.

       The SPCC  rule provides flexibility regarding integrity testing requirements of bulk storage
containers, as long as the alternatives provide equivalent environmental protection per
§112.7(a)(2). Measures that may be considered environmentally equivalent to integrity testing for
shop-built containers are those that effectively minimize the risk of container failure and that allow
detection of leaks before they become significant.  Alternative measures to integrity testing requiring
the combination of internal, external, and non-destructive evaluation may, for example, prevent
container failure by minimizing the container's exposure to conditions that promote corrosion (e.g.,
direct contact with  soil), or they may enable facility personnel to detect teaks and other container
integrity problems early so they can be addressed before more severe integrity failure  occurs.  The
ability to use an environmentally equivalent alternative to integrity testing will often  hinge on the
degree of protection provided by the tank configuration and secondary containment. EPA believes
that larger tanks (including larger shop-built tanks)  may require inspection by a professional
inspector, in addition to the visual inspection by the tank owner/operator during the tank's life.  EPA
defers to applicable industry standards and to the certifying PE as to the type and scope of
inspections  required in each case.  However, the inspector should look for a clear rationale for the
development of the inspection and testing program, paying close attention to the referenced
industry standard.

       EPA believes that environmental equivalence may be appropriate in other situations. For
example, facilities that store edible oils as part of a food manufacturing process may adhere to very
strict housekeeping and maintenance procedures that involve ongoing visual inspection and routine
cleaning of the exterior and interior of the containers (which are elevated so all sides are visible or
sit on a barrier that allows for rapid detect of a leak) by facility personnel. As part of these routine
inspections, small leaks can be detected before they can cause a discharge as defined in
§112.1(b).  The PE certifying the  facility's SPCC Plan may determine, upon considering applicable
food-related regulations, industry standards, and site-specific conditions, that  such inspections and
housekeeping procedures provide environmental protection equivalent to performing an integrity
test on these containers.

       As with other requirements eligible for environmental equivalence provision, the measures
implemented as alternatives to integrity  testing required under §112.8(c)(6) or §112.12(c)(6) may
US. Environmental Protection Agency
7-19
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
not be measures already required to meet another part of the SPCC rule.  A facility may not rely
solely on measures that are required by other sections of the rule (e.g., secondary containment) to
provide "equivalent environmental protection." Otherwise, the deviation provision would allow for
approaches that provide a lesser degree of protection overall. However, for certain tank sizes and
configurations of secondary containment, continuous release detection and frequent visual
inspection by the owner/operator may be the sole inspection requirement, provided that the
rationale is discussed in the Plan (STI SP-001).  This rationale should include a discussion of good
engineering practice referencing appropriate industry standards.

7.3,4  Environmental Equivalence Scenarios for Shop-Built Containers

       Scenario 1: Elevated Drums. As EPA has indicated in the 2002  Figure 7-2.  Drums elevated
preamble to the revised SPCC rule, certain smaller shop-built containers   are^to^bjectto secondary
(e.g., 55-gallon drums) for which internal corrosion poses minimal risk of   containment requirements for
failure, which are inspected at least monthly, and for which all sides are    bulk storage in §112-8(c)(2)
visible (i.e., the container has no contact with the ground), visual
inspection alone might be considered to provide equivalent environmental
protection, subject to good engineering practice (67 FR 47120).  In  fact,
certain industry standards also reference these conditions as good
engineering practice.  For example, elevating storage drums on an
appropriately designed storage rack (as shown in Figure 7-2) such  that all
sides are visible allows the effective visual inspection of containers  for
early signs of deterioration and leakage,  and is therefore considered
environmentally equivalent to the requirement for integrity testing beyond
visual inspection for these smaller bulk storage containers.  Note that the
drums, even if elevated, remain subject to the bulk storage secondary containment requirements in
§112.8(c)(2) or §112.12(c)(2).  Determination of environmental equivalence is subject to good
engineering practice, including consideration of industry standards, as certified by the PE in
accordance with §112.3(d).

       Scenario 2: Single-Use Bulk Storage Containers. For containers that are single-use and
for dispensing only (i.e., the container is not refilled), EPA recognizes that industry standards
typically require only visual examination by the owner/operator Since these containers are
single-use, internal or comparative integrity testing for corrosion is generally not appropriate
because the containers are not maintained on site for a long enough period of time that degradation
and deterioration of the container's integrity  might occur.  Single-use containers (e.g., 55-gallon
drums) typically are returned to the vendor, recycled, or disposed of in accordance with applicable
regulations.  Good engineering practices for single-use containers should  be identified in the Plan,
and these practices should ensure that the conditions of storage or use of a container do not
subject it to potential corrosion or other conditions that may  compromise its integrity in its single-use
lifetime. Typically, good engineering practice recommends that these containers be elevated
(usually on pallets  or other support structures) to minimize bottom corrosion and to facilitate a visual
inspection of all sides  of the container to  detect any leaks during the regular owner/operator
inspections outlined in the Plan. Determination of environmental equivalence is subject to good

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency         7-20                      Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
                                                 Chapter 7: Inspection, Evaluation, and Testing
engineering practice, including consideration of industry standards, as certified by the PE in
accordance with §112.3(d).

       When the container is fully emptied and meets the definition of a permanently closed
container (§112.2) (including labeling), it is not subject to the SPCC requirements, including the
integrity testing requirements.  In this case, the capacity of the container does not count toward the
facility threshold capacity. If the container is refilled on site, however, it is not considered a
single-use container, and is therefore subject to the integrity testing requirements of the rule.
                                                         Figure 7-3. Shop-built containers elevated
                                                         on saddles.
       Scenario 3: Elevated shop-built containers.  For
certain shop-built containers with a shell capacity of 30,000
gallons or under, EPA considers that visual inspection
provides equivalent environmental protection when
accompanied by certain additional actions to ensure that the
containers are not in contact with the soil. These actions
include elevating the container in a manner that decreases
corrosion potential and makes all sides of the container,
including the bottom, visible during inspection.  Examples  of
adequate measures include elevating shop-built containers
on properly designed tank saddles as illustrated in Figure 7-3
and described in EPA's letter to PMAA.7 Determination of environmental equivalence is subject to
good engineering practice, including consideration of industry standards, as certified by the PE in
accordance with §112.3(d).

       Scenario 4: Shop-built containers placed on a liner.  For certain shop-built containers
with a shell capacity of 30,000 gallons or under, visual  inspection, plus certain additional actions to
ensure the containment and detection  of leaks, is also considered by EPA to provide equivalent
environmental protection.  Actions may include placing the containers onto a barrier between the
container and the ground,  designed and operated in a way that ensures that any leaks are
immediately detected.  For example, placing a shop-built container on an adequately designed,
maintained,  and inspected synthetic liner would generally provide equivalent environmental
protection. Determination  of environmental  equivalence is subject to good engineering practice,
including consideration of industry standards, as certified by the PE in accordance with §112.3(d).

       Other Situations.  Although the scenarios discussed above primarily address shop-built
tanks, environmental equivalence may be used for other types of bulk storage containers, subject to
good engineering practice. In any case where the owner or operator of a facility uses an alternative
means of meeting the integrity testing requirement of §112.8(c)(6) or §112.12(c)(6), the SPCC Plan
must provide the reason for the deviation, describe the alternative approach, and explain how it
achieves equivalent environmental protection (§112.7(a)(2)), while considering good engineering
practice and industry standards. The description  of the alternative approach should address how
  7 For more information, refer to EPA's letter to the Petroleum Marketers Association of America, available on EPA's
  Web site at http://vvww.epa.gov/oilspill/pdfs/PMAAJetter.pdf.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                                            7-21
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
the approach complies or deviates from industry inspection standards and how it will be
implemented in the field. For example, if the alternative approach involves the visual inspection of
the containers, the SPCC Plan should describe the key elements of this inspection, including the
inspection frequency and scope, the training and/or qualifications of individuals conducting the
inspections, and the records used to document the inspection.  If the alternative measure relies on
engineered systems to mitigate corrosion (e.g., coatings, cathodic protection) or to facilitate early
detection of small leaks, the SPCC Plan  should describe how such systems are maintained and
monitored to ensure their effectiveness.  For instance, where the alternative measure relies on the
presence of a liner, the Plan should discuss how the liner is adequately designed, maintained, and
inspected. This discussion may consider such factors as life expectancy stated by the
manufacturer (from cut-sheets), as-built specifications, and inspection and maintenance
procedures.

       As discussed above, the environmental equivalence provision applies to the inspection and
appropriate integrity testing of bulk storage containers at §§112.8(c)(6), 112.9{c)(3), and
112.12(c)(6). PEs have the flexibility to offer environmental equivalent integrity testing options for
all classes of tanks,  including shop-built tanks above 30,000 gallon capacity and field-erected tanks,
if the rationale is provided referencing  appropriate industry standards.

7.4   Documentation  Requirements and Role of the EPA Inspector

       The facility SPCC Plan must describe the scope and schedule of examinations to be
performed on bulk storage containers (as required in §§112.3(d)(1)(iv), 112.7(e), 112.8(c)(6),
112.9(c)(3), and 112.12(c)(6)), and should reference an applicable industry inspection standard or
describe an equivalent program developed by the PE, in accordance with good engineering
practice. If a PE specifies a hybrid inspection  and testing program, then the EPA inspector should
verify that the testing program covers minimum elements for the inspections, the frequency of
inspections, and their scope (e.g., wall thickness, footings, tank supports). See Section 7.5 for a list
of suggested minimum standards.

       A hybrid testing program may be  appropriate for a facility where an industry inspection
standard does not yet contain enough  specificity for a  particular facility's universe of tanks and/or
configuration, or while modifications to an industry inspection standard are under consideration. For
example, a tank user may have made  a request to the industry standard-setting organizations
recommending a change or modification  to a standard. Both API and STI have mechanisms to
allow tank users (and the regulatory community) to request changes to their respective inspection
standards.  In this case, the modification to a standard may be  proposed,  but not yet accepted by
the standard-setting organization. In the meantime, the facility  is still subject to the SPCC
requirements to develop  an inspection and testing program.  In this scenario, a hybrid inspection
and testing program may be appropriate. When reviewing the scope and schedule of a hybrid
program, the inspector should review whether an industry inspection standard and appropriate good
engineering practices were used in the development of the hybrid program.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency         7-22                     Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
                                                Chapter 7: Inspection, Evaluation, and Testing
       The facility must maintain records of all visual inspections and integrity testing, as required
bytheSPCCrulein§§112.7(e), 112.8(c)(6), 112.9(c)(3), and 112.12(c)(6).  Records do not need to
be specifically created for this purpose, and may follow the format of records kept under usual and
customary business practices. These records should include the frequent inspections performed by
facility personnel. Also, industry standards generally provide example guidelines for formal tank
inspections, as well as sample checklists.  The EPA inspector should review the inspection
checklists used by the facility to verify that they cover at least the minimum elements and are in
accordance with the PE-certified inspection and testing program. The tank inspection checklist
from Appendix F of 40 CFR part 112, reproduced as Table 7-6 at the end of this chapter, provides
an example of the type of information that  may be included on an owner/operator-performed
inspection checklist.

       The EPA inspector should review records of frequent visual inspections by facility personnel
as well as regular integrity testing of the container.  Comparison records maintained at the facility
will aid in determining a container's suitability for continued service.  Both API 653 and STI SP-001
contain details on determining a container's suitability for continued service. Though §112.7(e)
requires retention of all records for a period of three years, industry standards usually recommend
retention of certified inspection and non-destructive examination  reports for the life of the container.

       In cases where the SPCC Plan has not identified a regularly scheduled  inspection and
testing program, the inspector should request information  on the anticipated schedule (e.g., when a
baseline has not been established). If the facility has not performed any integrity testing of bulk
storage containers so far, the EPA inspector should verify that the SPCC Plan describes: (1) the
strategy for implementing an inspection and testing program and collecting baseline conditions
within ten years of the installation date of the tank, or during the first five-year Plan cycle (or another
schedule as identified and certified by a PE); and (2) the ongoing testing program that will be
established once the baseline information  has been collected. When the inspection program
establishes inspection priorities for multiple containers, the inspector should consider the rationale
for these priorities as described in the SPCC Plan and verify implementation.

       The EPA inspector should review records of regular and periodic inspections and tests of
buried and aboveground piping, valves, and appurtenances.  Such inspections may be visual or
conducted by other means.

       The inspector reviewing a maintenance program, such as the flowline maintenance program
required under §112.9(d)(3) for oil production facilities, should verify that the Ran describes how
the flowlines are configured, monitored, and maintained to prevent discharges. The inspector
should also verify that the program is implemented  in the field; for example,  by  verifying that facility
personnel responsible for the maintenance of the equipment are aware of the flowline locations  and
are familiar with maintenance  procedures, including replacement of damaged and/or leaking
flowlines.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
7-23
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
       If an impracticability determination is made for secondary containment of flowlines, the EPA
inspector should extensively review the adequacy of the flowline maintenance program along with
the contingency plan (67 FR 47078).

       In summary, the EPA inspector should verify that the owner or operator has inspection
reports that document the implementation of the testing, evaluation, or inspection criteria set forth in
the Plan. He/she may also verify whether the recommended actions that affect the potential for a
discharge have been taken to ensure the integrity of the container/piping until the next scheduled
inspection or replacement of the container/piping. When an inspection procedure is outlined in the
Plan that does not meet the requirement of §§112.8(c)(6) and 112.12(c){6) (e.g., a combination of
visual inspection and another testing technique), the inspector should verify that the Plan includes a
discussion of an environmentally equivalent measure in accordance with §112.7(a)(2).
Implementation of the SPCC Plan as  certified by the PE is the responsibility of the facility
owner/operator (§112.3{d)(2)).

       By certifying an SPCC Plan, the PE attests that the Plan has been prepared  in accordance
with good engineering practice, that it meets the requirements of 40 CFR part 112, and that it is
adequate for the facility.  Thus, if testing, evaluation, or inspection procedures have  been reviewed
by the certifying PE and are properly documented, they should generally be considered acceptable
by the EPA inspector. However, if testing, evaluation, or inspection procedures do not meet the
standards of common sense, appear to be at odds with recognized industry standards, do not meet
the overall objective of oil spill response/prevention, or appear to be inadequate for the facility,
appropriate follow-up action may be warranted. In this case, the EPA inspector should clearly
document any concerns to assist review and foltow-up by the Regional Administrator.  The EPA
inspector may also  request additional information from the facility owner or operator regarding the
testing, evaluation,  or inspection procedures provided in the Plan.

7.5   Summary of Industry Standards and Regulations

       This section provides an overview and description of the scope and key elements of
pertinent industry inspection standards, including references to relevant sections of the standards.
Additionally, the section discusses the minimum elements for a so-called "hybrid" inspection
program for unique circumstances for which industry inspections standards do not contain enough
specificity for a given facility's tank universe and configuration, or for which the PE chooses to
deviate from the industry standards based on professional judgement. When words such as "must,"
"required," and "necessary," or other such terms are used in this section, they are used in
describing what the various standards state and are not considered requirements imposed by EPA,
unless otherwise stated in the regulations.

       Industry standards are technical guidelines created by experts in a particular industry for use
throughout that industry.  These guidelines assist in establishing common levels of safety and
common practices for manufacture, maintenance, and repair. Created by standard-setting
organizations using a consensus process, the standards establish the minimum accepted industry
practice. The SPCC rule (§112.3(d)(1)(iii)) requires that the Plan be prepared in accordance with

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency         7-24                     Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
                                                 Chapter 7: Inspection, Evaluation, and Testing
good engineering practices, including the consideration of applicable industry standards.  Use of a
particular standard is voluntary.  If a standard (or parts of a standard) is incorporated into a facility's
SPCC Plan, then adherence to that standard is mandatory for implementation of the Plan.

       Although these guidelines are often grouped together under the term "standards," several
other terms are used to differentiate among the types of guidelines:

       •       Standard (or code)—set of instructions or guidelines.  Use of a particular standard
              is voluntary.  Some groups draw a distinction between a standard and a code. The
              American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), for example, stipulates that a
              code is a standard that "has been adopted by one or more governmental bodies and
              has the force of law..."
              Recommended practice—advisory document often useful for a particular situation.
              Specification—may be one element of a code or standard or may be used
              interchangeably with these terms.

7.5.1   API Standard 653 - Tank Inspection, Repair, Alteration, and Reconstruction

       API Standard 653 -Tank Inspection, Repair, Alteration, and Reconstruction {API 653)8
provides the minimum requirements for maintaining the integrity of carbon and alloy steel tanks built
to API Standard 650 (Welded Steel Tanks for Oil Storage) and its predecessor, API 12C (Welded
Oil Storage Tanks). API 653 may also be used for any steel tank constructed to a tank
specification.9

       API 653 covers the maintenance, inspection, repair,  alteration, relocation, and
reconstruction of welded or riveted, non-refrigerated, atmospheric pressure, aboveground,
field-fabricated, vertical storage tanks after they have been placed in service. The  standard limits
its scope to the tank foundation, bottom, shell, structure, roof,  attached appurtenances, and nozzles
to the face of the first flange, first threaded joint, or first welding-end connection. The standard is
intended for use by those facilities that utilize engineering and inspection personnel technically
trained and experienced in tank  design, fabrication,  repair, construction, and inspection.  Section 1
of the standard introduces the standard and details its scope.  Sections 2 and 3 of the standard list
the works cited and definitions used in the standard, respectively.

       The standard requires that a tank evaluation be conducted when tank inspection  results
reveal a change in a tank from its original physical condition. Sections 4 and 5 of the standard
describe procedures for evaluating an existing tank's suitability for continued operation or a change
of service; for making decisions  about repairs or alterations; or when considering dismantling,
relocating,  or reconstructing an existing tank. Section  4 of the standard details the procedures to
  8 API Standard 653, "Tank Inspection, Repair, Alteration, and Reconstruction," Third Edition, Addendum 1, American
  Petroleum Institute, September 2003.

  9 See Section 1.1.3 of API Standard 653.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency         7-25                     Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
follow in evaluating the roof, shell, bottom, and foundation of the tank. Section 5 of the standard
provides a decision tree to evaluate a tank's risk of brittle fracture.

       Section 6 focuses on factors to consider when establishing inspection intervals and covers
detailed procedures for performing external and internal tank integrity inspections.  Inspection
intervals are largely dependent upon a tank's service history. The standard establishes time
intervals for when routine in-service inspections of the tank exterior are to be conducted by the
owner/operator and when external visual inspections are to  be conducted by an authorized
inspector. External ultrasonic thickness (UT) inspections may also be conducted periodically to
measure the thickness of the shell and are used to determine the rate of corrosion. Time intervals
for external UT inspections are also provided and are based on whether or not the corrosion rate is
known.

       Internal inspections (Section 6.4 of the standard) primarily focus on measuring the thickness
of the tank bottom and assessing its integrity. Measured or anticipated corrosion rates of the tank
bottom can be used to establish internal inspection intervals; however, the inspection interval
cannot exceed 20 years using these criteria.  Alternatively, risk-based inspection (RBI) procedures,
which focus attention specifically on the equipment and associated deterioration mechanisms
presenting the most risk to the facility (Section 6.4.3 of the standard), can be used to establish
internal inspection intervals; an RBI may increase or decrease the 20-year inspection interval.  API
653 states that an RBI assessment shall be reviewed and approved by an authorized tank inspector
and a tank design/corrosion engineer.  If a facility chooses to use RBI in the development of a tank
integrity testing program, the EPA inspector should verify that these parties conducted the initial
RBI assessment.

       An external inspection (Section 6.5 of the standard)  can be used in place of an internal
inspection to determine the bottom plate thickness in cases where the external tank bottom is
accessible due to construction, size, or other aspects. If chosen, this option should be documented
and included as part of the tank's permanent record. Owners/operators should maintain records
that detail construction, inspection history, and repair/alteration history for the tank (Section 6.8 of
the standard).  Section 6.9 of the standard stipulates that detailed  reports should be filed for every
inspection performed.

       Sections 7 through 11  of API 653 do not address integrity testing, but instead focus on the
repair, alteration, and  reconstruction of tanks. Section 12 provides specific criteria  for examining
and testing repairs made to tanks. Section 13 addresses the specific requirements for recording
any evaluations, repairs, alterations, or reconstructions that have been performed on a tank in
accordance with this standard. Appendix A to API 653  provides background information on
previously published editions of API welded steel  storage tank standards. Appendix B details the
approaches that are used to monitor and evaluate the settlement of a tank bottom.10 Appendix C
provides sample checklists that the owner/operator can use when  developing inspection intervals
and specific procedures for internal and external inspections of both  in-service and out-of-service
  10 See Section 1.1.3 of API 653.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency         7-26                      Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
                                                Chapter 7: Inspection, Evaluation, and Testing
tanks.  The requirements for authorized inspector certification are the focus of Appendix D.
Certification of authorized tank inspectors, which is valid for three years from the date of issue,
requires the successful completion of an examination, as well as a combination of education and
experience. Technical inquiries related to the standard are the focus of Appendix E. Appendix F
summarizes the non-destructive examination (NDE) requirements for reconstructed and repaired
tanks.  Technical inquiries regarding the use of the standard can be  made through API's Web site
(www.api.org). Selected responses to technical inquiries are provided in the Technical Inquiry
appendices of the standard.

7.5.2  STI Standard SP-001 - Standard for the Inspection of Aboveground Storage Tanks

       STI Standard SP-001 - Standard for the Inspection of Aboveground Storage Tanks
(SP-001)11 provides the minimum inspection requirements and evaluation criteria required to
determine the suitability for continued service of aboveground storage tanks until the next
scheduled inspection.  Only aboveground tanks included in the scope of this standard are
applicable for inspection per this standard.  Other standards, recommended practices, and other
equivalent engineering and best practices exist that provide alternative inspection requirements for
tanks defined within the scope of this standard and for tanks outside the scope of this standard.
For example, API Standard 653, "Tank Inspection, Repair, Alteration, and Reconstruction," provides
additional information pertaining to tanks built to API 650 and API 12C.  API 12R1, "Recommended
Practice for Setting, Maintenance, Inspection, Operation, and Repair of Tanks in Production
Service," pertains to tanks employed in production service or other similar service.

       SP-001 applies to the inspection of aboveground storage tanks, including shop-fabricated
tanks, field-erected tanks, and portable containers, as defined in this standard, as well as the
containment systems.  The inspection and testing requirements for field-erected tanks are  covered
separately in Appendix B of the standard.  Specifically, the  standard applies to ASTs storing  stable,
flammable, and combustible liquids at atmospheric pressure with a specific gravity less than
approximately 1.0 and those storing liquids with operating temperatures between ambient
temperature and 200 degrees Fahrenheit (93.3'C). At a minimum, the following tank components
shall be inspected (as applicable): tank, supports, anchors, foundation, gauges and alarms,
insulation, appurtenances, vents, release prevention barriers, and spill control systems.

       Section 3 addresses safety considerations, and Section 4 addresses AST inspector
qualifications.

       Section 5 of the standard addresses the criteria, including AST type, size, type of
installation, corrosion rate, and previous inspection history, if any, that should be used to develop a
schedule of inspections for each AST.  Table 5.5 (Table of Inspection Schedules) places tanks into
one of three categories and establishes different requirements regarding the type and frequency of
periodic inspection by tank owner/operators as well as format external and internal inspections by a
  11 STI Standard SP-001, "Standard for the Inspection of Aboveground Storage Tanks," 3rd Edition, Steel Tank
  Institute, July 2005.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
7-27
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
certified inspector.  The factors used for categorizing tanks include tank size, whether or not the
tank is in contact with the ground, the presence or absence of secondary containment (or spill
control), and the presence or absence of a continuous release detection method (CRDM).

       Section 6 provides guidelines for the periodic inspections conducted by the owner or his/her
designee. The owner's inspector is to complete an AST Record for each AST or tank site, as well
as a Monthly Inspection Checklist and an Annual  Inspection Checklist. Monthly inspections should
monitor water accumulation to prevent Microbial Influenced Corrosion (MIC), and action should be
taken if MIC is found. Additional requirements for field-erected tanks are in Appendix B of SP-001.

       Section 7 of SP-001 contains the minimum inspection requirements for formal external
inspections, which are to be performed by a certified inspector. Inspections should cover the AST
foundations, supports, secondary containment, drain valves, ancillary equipment, piping, vents,
gauges, grounding  system (if any), stairways, and coatings on the AST. Original shell thickness
should be determined using one of several suggested methods. Ultrasonic Thickness Testing
(UTT) readings are to be taken at different locations of the AST depending upon whether the AST is
horizontal, vertical,  rectangular, and/or insulated.  The final report should include field data,
measurements,  pictures, drawings, tables, and an inspection summary, and should specify the next
scheduled inspection.

       Section 8 of the standard details the minimum inspection requirements for formal internal
inspections, which are to be performed by a certified inspector. A formal internal inspection
includes the requirements of an external inspection with some additional requirements for specific
situations that are outlined in the standard. Double-wall tanks and secondary containment tanks
may be inspected by checking the interstice for liquid or by other equivalent methods. For elevated
ASTs where all external surfaces are accessible,  the internal inspection may be conducted by
examining the tank exterior using such methods as Ultrasonic Thickness Scans (UTS).  For all
other situations, entry into the interior of the AST  is necessary. Internal inspection guidelines are
detailed separately for horizontal ASTs and for vertical and rectangular ASTs in Sections 8.2 and
8.3, respectively. Additional requirements for field-erected tanks are in Appendix B. The final
report should contain elements similar to reports prepared for external inspections.

       Section 9 addresses leak testing methods. For shop-fabricated ASTs, the standard
references the Steel Tank Institute Recommended Practice R912, "Installation Instructions for Shop
Fabricated Stationary Aboveground Storage Tanks for Flammable, Combustible Liquids." The
standard also references DOT regulations for portable containers:

             49 CFR part 173.28, Reuse, reconditioning, and remanufacturing of packagings,
             mainly for drums;
       *      49 CFR part 178.803, Testing and  certification of intermediate bulk containers
             (IBCs); and
             49 CFR part 180.605, or equivalent, for portable container testing and recertification.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency        7-28                     Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
                                                Chapter 7; Inspection, Evaluation, and Testing
       Section 10 addresses the suitability for continued service based on the results of formal
internal and/or external inspections. For ASTs that show signs of damage caused by MIC, the
criteria for assessing their suitability for continued service differ based on the category they fall into
(as per Section 5 of SP-001). Categories refer to the level of reduction of the shell thickness. For
other tank damage, an engineer experienced in AST design or a tank manufacturer should
determine if an inspection is required for any AST that was exposed to fire, natural disaster,
excessive settlement, overpressure, or damage from cracking.

       Section 11 of the standard details recordkeeping requirements. Appendix A presents
supplemental technical information including terms commonly associated with ASTs, and Appendix
B presents information for the inspection of field-erected ASTs.

       For more information on SP-001, please visit the Steel Tank Institute Web site,
http://www.steeltank.com.

7.5.3  API Recommended Practice 575 - Inspection of Atmospheric and Low-Pressure
       Storage Tanks

       API Recommended Practice 575 - Inspection of Atmospheric and Low-Pressure Storage
Tanks12 (API RP 575), which supplements API 653, covers the inspection of atmospheric tanks
(e.g., cone roof and  floating roof tanks) and  low-pressure storage tanks (i.e., those that have
cylindrical shells and cone or dome roofs) that have been designed to operate at pressures from
atmospheric to 15 pounds per square inch gauge (psig). (API RP 572 covers tanks operating
above  15 psig.)  In addition to describing the types of storage tanks and standards for their
construction and maintenance, API RP 575  also covers the reasons for inspection, causes of
deterioration, frequency and methods of inspection, methods of repair, and the preparation of
records and reports. API RP 575 applies only to the inspection of atmospheric and low-pressure
storage tanks that have been in service. Section 1 of API RP 575 introduces the recommended
practice and details its scope. Section 2 lists the references that are cited in the recommended
practice.

       Section 3 of API RP 575 describes selected methods for non-destructive examination of
tanks, including ultrasonic thickness measurement, ultrasonic  corrosion testing, ultrasonic shear
wave testing, and  magnetic flux testing.  Section 4 describes the construction materials and  design
standards,  use,  and specific types of atmospheric and low-pressure storage tanks. Section 5
covers the reasons for inspection and causes of deterioration of both steel and non-steel storage
tanks.  Section 5 also covers the deterioration and failure of auxiliary equipment.

       Section 6 of API RP 575 addresses inspection  frequency; it mainly defers to the inspection
frequency requirements described in API 653. Section 7 covers the methods  of inspection and
inspection scheduling. It addresses the external inspection of both in-service and out-of-service
  12 API RP 575, "Inspection of Atmospheric and Low-Pressure Storage Tanks," 1sted., American Petroleum Institute,
  November 1995.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency         7-29                      Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
tanks and the internal inspection of out-of-service tanks. Section 7 provides some information
about scheduling tank inspections, but it mostly defers to API 653. Section 8 addresses the
methods for repairing tanks. Recordkeeping and inspection reports are the focus of Section 9,
which stresses the importance of keeping complete records.  Appendix A of the recommended
practice provides a typical field record form and history card. Appendix B contains a typical tank
report form. Appendix C provides sample checklists for internal and external tank inspections.

7.5.4  API Recommended Practice 12R1 - Recommended Practice for Setting, Maintenance,
       Inspection, Operation, and Repair of Tanks in Production Service

       API Recommended  Practice 12R1 - Recommended Practice for Setting, Maintenance,
Inspection, Operation, and Repair of Tanks in Production Service (API RP 12R1)13 provides
guidance on new tank installations and maintenance  of existing production tanks. These tanks are
often referred to as "upstream" or "extraction and production (E&P) tanks."  The recommended
practices are primarily intended for tanks fabricated to API  Specifications 12B, D, F, and P that are
employed in on-land production service.14 This said, the basic principles in the recommended
practices can also be applied to other atmospheric tanks that are employed in  similar oil and gas
production, treating, and processing services; however, they are not applicable to refineries,
marketing bulk stations, petrochemical plants, or pipeline storage facilities operated by carriers.
According to the recommended practice, tanks that are fabricated to API Standards 12C or 650
should be maintained in accordance with API 653,  summarized above.

       Sections 1, 2, and 3 of API RP 12R1 describe the scope of the standard, the 19 standards it
references, and the relevant definitions, respectively. The  remaining four main sections describe
the recommended practices. Section 4 provides recommended practices for setting of new or
relocated tanks and connecting tanks.  Section 5 recommends  practices for safe operation and spill
prevention for tanks.15 Section 6 details the recommended practices for routine operational and
external and internal condition examinations, internal and external inspections, maintenance of
tanks, and recordkeeping. Table 1  of this recommended practice details the type of observations,
frequency, and associated personnel requirements for internal and external tank inspections.
Records from these inspections should be retained with permanent equipment records. Finally,
Section 7 provides guidance for the alteration or repair of various tank components. API RP 12R1
also contains nine appendices detailing the recommended requirements of qualified inspectors,
sample calculations for venting requirements, observations regarding shell corrosion and brittle
fracture, checklists for internal and external condition examinations and inspections, details
regarding the minimum thickness of tank elements, and various figures and diagrams.
  13 API Recommended Practice 12R1, "Recommended Practice for Setting, Maintenance, Inspection, Operation, and
  Repair of Tanks in Production Service," 5th edition. American Petroleum Institute. August 1997.

  14 API Specifications 12B, 0, F, and P correspond to bolted tanks for storage of production liquids, field welded tanks
  for storage of production liquids, shop welded tanks for storage of production liquids, and specification for fiberglass
  reinforced plastic tanks, respectively.

  18 Section 7 of API RP 12R1 states that "..the spill prevention and examination/inspection provisions of this
  recommended practice should be a companion to the spill prevention control and countemeasures (SPCC) to
  prevent environmental damage."

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency         7-30                     Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
                                                 Chapter 7: Inspection, Evaluation, and Testing
7.5.5  API 570 - Piping Inspection Code: Inspection, Repair, Alteration, and Rerating of
       In-service Piping Systems

       API 570 - Piping Inspection Code: Inspection, Repair, Alteration, and Rerating of In-service
Piping Systems (API 570)16 covers inspection, repair, alteration, and'rerating procedures for metallic
piping systems that have been in service. API 570 was developed for the petroleum refining and
chemical process industries.  In-service piping systems covered by API 570 include those used for
process fluids, hydrocarbons, and similar flammable or toxic fluids. API states that this standard is
not a substitute for the original construction requirements governing a piping system before it is
placed in service. API 570 is intended for use by organizations that maintain or have access to an
authorized inspection agency; a repair organization;  and technically qualified piping engineers,
inspectors, and examiners. The owner/operator is responsible for implementing a piping system
inspection program, controlling the inspection frequencies, and ensuring the maintenance of piping
systems in accordance with this standard.

       Section 5, the first substantive section of the  standard, addresses the specific inspection
and testing practices for in-service piping systems.  Section 6 addresses the frequency and extent
of inspection of piping. Inspection  intervals for piping are based largely on the likelihood and
consequence of failure (i.e., they are risk-based), which takes into account the corrosion rate and
remaining life calculations; piping service classification; applicable jurisdictional  requirements; and
the judgement of the inspector, the piping engineer, the piping engineer supervisor, or a corrosion
specialist. Table 6-1 of API 570 provides maximum  inspection intervals for piping based on piping
service classification (Class 1 poses the highest risk of an emergency if a leak were to occur; Class
2, which includes the majority of unit process piping, poses an intermediate risk; Class 3 poses the
lowest risk) and the corrosion measurement technique (i.e., thickness measurements or visual
external inspection) that is used.  In general, the maximum inspection interval for in-service piping
should be between five years for Class 1 piping to ten years for Class 3 piping.

       Section 7 of the standard addresses data evaluation, analysis, and recording. The
owner/operator should maintain permanent records for all piping systems covered by API 570.
Section 8 provides guidelines for repairing, altering, and rerating piping systems. Inspecting buried
process piping is different from inspecting other process piping because the inspection is hindered
by the inaccessibility of the affected areas of the piping; therefore, API 570 addresses the
inspection of buried piping separately in Section 9. Appendices A,  B, C, and D of API 570 address
inspector certification, technical inquiries, examples of repairs, and the external  inspection checklist
for process piping, respectively.
  16 API 570, "Piping Inspection Code: Inspection, Repair, Alteration, and Rerating of In-service Piping Systems," 2nd
  ed., American Petroleum Institute, October 1998.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency        7-31                      Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
7.5.6  API Recommended Practice 574 - Inspection Practices for Piping System
       Components

       API Recommended Practice 574 - Inspection Practices for Piping System Components (API
RP 574)17 covers inspection practices for piping, tubing, valves (other than control valves), and
fittings used in petroleum refineries and chemical plants. API RP 574 is not specifically intended to
cover specialty items, such as control valves, level gauges, and instrument controls columns, but
many of the inspection methods are applicable to these items.  API RP 574 provides more detailed
information about piping system components and inspection procedures than API 570. Section 1
introduces the recommended practice and details its scope. Sections 2 and 3, respectively, list the
references and definitions used throughout the recommended practice.

       Section 4, which begins the substantive portion of the recommended practice, details the
types, material specifications, sizes, and other characteristics of the components of the piping
system, which include the piping, tubing, valves, and fittings.  This section of the recommended
practice also addresses the common joining methods used to assemble piping components.
Section 5 of API RP 574 presents the rationale for inspecting the piping system: to maintain safety,
attain reliable and efficient operation, and meet regulatory requirements.  The procedures for
monitoring the piping system components for corrosion and inspecting for deterioration are the
focus of Section 6.  Section 7 provides guidelines for establishing the frequency and time (i.e., while
equipment is operating or while equipment is shut down) of inspection.  Similar to API 570, this
recommended practice uses the following conditions to determine the frequency of inspection: the
consequences of a failure (piping classification, see summary of API 570 for a description), the
degree of risk, the amount of corrosion allowance remaining, the historical data available, and the
regulatory requirements.

       Section 8 of API RP 574 outlines the safety precautions that should be taken and
preparatory work that should be performed prior to inspecting the piping system components. The
inspection tools commonly used to inspect piping are tabulated in Section 9 of this recommended
practice.  Section 10 details the specific procedures that should be followed when inspecting the
components of the  piping  system. This section also covers the inspection of underground piping
(Section 10.3) and  new construction (Section 10.4). Section 11 describes the procedures a piping
engineer should follow to determine the thickness at which piping and valves and flanged fittings
should be retired.  Recordkeeping is the focus of Section 12.  Appendix A of the recommended
practice provides an external inspection checklist for process piping.
  17 API RP 574, "Inspection Practices for Piping System Components," 2nd ed.,  American Petroleum Institute, June
  1998.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency        7-32                     Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
                                                 Chapter 7: Inspection, Evaluation, and Testing
7.5.7   API Recommended Practice 1110 - Pressure Testing of Liquid Petroleum Pipelines

       API Recommended Practice 1110 - Pressure Testing of Liquid Petroleum Pipelines (API RP
1110)18 provides guidance regarding the procedures, equipment, and factors to consider when
pressure testing new and existing liquid petroleum pipelines. Pressure testing uses a liquid test
medium (typically water) to apply internal pressure to a segment of pipe above its normal or
maximum operating pressure for a fixed period of time under no-flow conditions to verify that the
"test segments have the requisite structural integrity to withstand normal and maximum operating
pressures19 and to verify that they are capable of liquid containment." This testing should be
performed by 'lest personnel" in accordance with ASME B31.4 20 and 49 CFR part 195.21

       Sections 1 and 2 of API RP 1110 describe the scope of the standard and publications it
references, respectively.  Section 3 explains how the pressure testing, performed one segment of
pipe at a time, should be executed. Generally this is done by filling a section of pipe with  the testing
medium and increasing the pressure from its  static pressure level at a controlled rate. Pipe
connections are tested for leaks during the pressurization and after the test pressure has been
reached.

       Complete records of the testing should be kept, including information on any failures, the
places they occurred, and the methods of repair they require in order to comply with ASME B31.4,
49 CFR part 195, and any other applicable regulations. The final part of API RP 1110 is Appendix
A, which provides samples of various test record forms.

7.5.8   API Recommended Practice 579,  Fitness-for-Service, Section 3

       This recommended practice22 addresses "Assessment of Existing Equipment for Brittle
Fracture" and provides guidelines for evaluating the resistance to brittle fracture of existing carbon
and low alloy steel pressure vessels, piping, and storage tanks. If the results of the
fitness-for-service assessment indicate that the AST is suitable for the current operating conditions,
then the equipment can continue to be operated under the same conditions  provided that suitable
monitoring/inspection programs are established. API RP 579 is intended to  supplement and
augment the requirements in API 653. That is, when API 653 does not  provide specific evaluation
procedures or acceptance criteria for a specific type of degradation, or when API 653 explicitly
allows the use of fitness-for-service criteria, API  RP 579 may be used to evaluate the various types
of degradation or test requirements addressed in API 653.
  18 API Recommended Practice 1110, "Pressure Testing of Liquid Petroleum Pipelines," 4th edition, American
  Petroleum Institute, March 1997.

  19 This does not include low-pressure pneumatic testing.

  20 ASME B31.4, "Liquid Transportation Systems for Hydrocarbons, Liquid Petroleum Gas, Anhydrous Ammonia, and
  Alcohols."

  21 U.S. Department of Transportation.  Research and Special Programs Administration (49 CFR part 195).

  22 API Recommended Practice 579, "Fitness for Service," 1s'Edition, American Petroleum Institute, January 2000.
US. Environmental Protection Agency
7-33
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
       A brittle fracture assessment may be warranted based on operating conditions and/or the
condition of the AST. API RP 579 provides separate brittle fracture assessment procedures for
continued service based on three levels.  All three apply to pressure vessels, piping, and tankage,
although a separate assessment procedure is provided for tankage.

              Level 1 assessments are used for equipment that meets toughness requirements in
              a recognized code or standard (e.g., API 650).
              Level 2 assessments exempt equipment from further assessment and qualify it for
              continued service based on one of three methods.  These methods are based on
              operating pressure and temperature; performance of a hydrotest; or the materials of
              construction, operating conditions, service environment,  and past operating
              experience.
       *       Level 3 assessments, which normally utilize a fracture mechanics methodology, are
              used for tanks that do not meet the acceptance criteria for Levels 1 and 2.

       A decision tree in API RP 579 (Figure 3.2, Brittle Fracture Assessment for Storage Tanks)
outlines this assessment procedure. The Level 1 and Level 2 brittle fracture assessment
procedures are nearly identical to those found in API 653, Section 5, with a few notable exceptions:
API 653 does not use the Level 1  and Level 2 designations; API 653 applies only to tanks that meet
API 650 (7th edition or later) construction standards, whereas API 579 applies to tanks that meet
toughness requirements in the "current construction code"; and  the two standards set a different
limit on the maximum membrane stress (the stress forces that form within the shell as a  result of the
pressure of the liquid inside the vessel). There is, however, one major difference between API 653
and API 579: API 653, Section 5, does not allow for an exemption of the hydrostatic test
requirement as API 579 does. API 579 allows for a probabilistic evaluation of the potential for brittle
fracture using engineering calculations (i.e., a Level 3 assessment) in lieu of the hydrostatic test.

7.5.9   API Standard 2610 - Design, Construction, Operation, Maintenance, and Inspection of
       Terminal & Tank Facilities

       The standard23 has short sections on petroleum terminals,  pipeline tankage facilities,
refinery facilities, bulk plants, lube blending and packaging facilities, asphalt plants, and  aviation
service facilities;  these sections mainly serve to define what is meant by each type of facility. The
standard does not apply to installations covered by API Standard 2510  and API RP 12R1, as well
as a list of specific types of facilities and equipment Indicated in the standard.  The standard lists
governmental requirements and reviews that should be conducted to ensure that facilities meet
applicable federal, state, or local requirements (Section 1.3); and has an extensive list of standards,
codes, and specifications to use (Section 2.1).

       Section 4 of the standard covers the site selection and spacing requirements for the design
and construction of new terminal facilities. Section 5 addresses the methods of pollution prevention
  23 API Recommended Practice 2610, "Design, Construction, Operation, Maintenance, and Inspection of Terminal and
  Tank Facilities," 2nd edition, American Petroleum Institute, May 2005.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
7-34
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
                                                 Chapter 7: Inspection, Evaluation, and Testing
and waste management practices in the design, maintenance, and operation of petroleum terminal
and tank facilities.  Section 6 covers the safe operation of terminals and tanks such as hazard
identification, operating procedures, safe work practices, emergency response and control
procedures, training, and other provisions.  Section 7 covers fire prevention and protection,
including tank overfill protection and inspection and maintenance programs. This section also
covers considerations for special products. Section 8 covers aboveground petroleum storage tanks
and appurtenances such as release prevention, leak detection, and air emissions. This section
covers operations, inspections, maintenance, and repair for aboveground and underground tanks.
Section 9 addresses dikes and berms. Section 10 covers pipe, valves, pumps, and piping systems.
Section 11  covers loading, unloading, and product transfer facilities and activities including spill
prevention  and containment. Section 12 addresses the procedures and practices for achieving
effective corrosion control. Section 13 addresses structures, utilities, and yards. Section 14 covers
removal or  decommissioning of facilities. All of these sections extensively reference the regulatory
requirements and applicable industry standards.

7.5.10 ASME B31.3 - Process Piping

       ASME B31.3 - Process Piping24 is the generally accepted standard of minimum safety
requirements for the oil,  petrochemical, and chemical industries' process piping design  and
construction (for process piping already in service, other standards should be used, such as API
570, "Piping Inspection Code").  ASME B31.3 is written to be very broad in scope to cover a range
of fluids, temperatures, and pressures. This broad coverage leaves a great deal of responsibility
with the owner to use good engineering practices. The safety requirements for the design,
examination, and testing of process piping vary in stringency based on three different categories of
fluid service. Categories include "Category D" for a low hazard of fluid service, "Category M" for a
high hazard of fluid service, with all remaining fluid services that are not in Category D or Category
M being "Normal."  It is the owner's responsibility to  select the appropriate fluid service  category,
which determines the appropriate examination requirements.

       The examination of process piping is to  be completed by an examiner who demonstrates
sufficient qualifications to perform the specified examination and who has training and experience
records kept by his/her employer that can support these qualifications.25  Different types of
examinations performed include visual examinations, radiographic examinations, ultrasonic
examinations, in-process examinations, liquid-penetrant examinations, magnetic-particle
examinations, and hardness testing.

       While these examinations are a part of the quality assurance procedures for new piping,
leak testing should also be performed to test the overall system. According to ASME B31.3, leak
testing is required for all new piping systems other than those classified as Category  D, which can
  24 ASME B31.3, "Process Piping: The Complete Guide to ASME B31.3," Charles Becht IV, The American Society of
  Mechanical Engineers, 2"" edition, 2004.

  25 ASME B31.3 does not have specific requirements for an examiner, but SNT-TC-1 A, "Recommended Practice for
  Nondestructive Testing Personnel Qualification and Certification," acts as an acceptable guide.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
7-35
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional inspectors
be examined for leaks after being put into service.  Options for leak testing include hydrostatic tests,
pneumatic tests, hydropneumatic tests, and alternative leak tests.

       The standard requires that records detailing the examination personnel's qualifications and
examination procedures be kept for at least five years. Test records or the inspector's certification
that the piping has passed pressure testing  are also required to be retained.

7.5.11 ASME Code for Pressure Piping B31.4-2002 - Pipeline Transportation Systems for
       Liquid Hydrocarbons and Other Liquids

       ASME Code for Pressure Piping B31.4-2002 - Pipeline Transportation Systems for
Liquid Hydrocarbons and Other Liquids26 describes "engineering requirements deemed necessary
for safe design and construction of pressure piping."  These requirements are for the "design,
materials, construction, assembly, inspection, and testing of piping transporting liquids" such as
crude oil and liquid petroleum products between various facilities. Piping includes bolting, valves,
pipes, gaskets, flanges, fittings, relief devices, pressure-containing parts of other piping
components, hangers and supports, and any other equipment used to prevent the overstressing of
pressure-containing pipes. This code's primary purpose is to "establish requirements for safe
design, construction, inspection, testing, operation, and maintenance of liquid pipeline systems for
protection of the general public and operating company personnel."

       The personnel inspecting the piping  are deemed qualified based on their level of training
and experience and should be capable of performing various inspection services such as right-of-
way and grading, welding, coating, pressure testing, and pipe surface inspections. Inspections of
piping material and inspections during piping construction  should include the visual evaluation of all
piping components. Once construction is complete, these piping components and the entire system
should be tested. Testing methods include hydrostatic testing of internal pressure piping; leak
testing; and qualification tests based on a visual examination, bending properties, determination of
wall thickness, determination of weld joint factor, weldability, determination of yield strength, and the
minimum yield strength value.

       Records detailing the design, construction, and testing of the piping should be kept in the
files of the operating company for the life of the facility.

7.5.12 DOT 49 CFR 180.605 - Requirements for Periodic Testing, Inspection, and Repair of
       Portable Tanks and Other Portable Containers

       Section 180.60527 applies to any portable tank constructed to a DOT (e.g., 51, 56, 57,60, or
intermodal [IM]) or United Nations (UN) specification.  According to these requirements, a portable
  28 ASME Code for Pressure Piping, B31.4-2002, "Pipeline Transportation Systems for Liquid Hydrocarbons and Other
  Liquids," The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, revision of ASME 831.4-1998, 2002.

  2r 49 CFR part 180.605, "Requirements for Periodic Testing, Inspection, and Repair of Portable Tanks," Department
  of Transportation, 64 FR 28052, May 24, 1999, as amended at 67 FR 15744, April 3, 2002.

US. Environmental Protection Agency         7-36                      Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
                                                 Chapter 7: Inspection, Evaluation, and Testing
tank must be inspected prior to further use if it shows evidence of a condition that might render it
unsafe for use, has been damaged in an accident, has been out of service for more than a year,
has been modified, or is in an unsafe operating condition. All tanks must receive an initial
inspection prior to being placed into service and a periodic inspection or intermediate periodic
inspection every two to five years. The timeframe between inspections depends upon the tank's
specification.

       Intermediate periodic inspections must include an internal and external examination of the
tank and fittings, a leak test, and a test of the service equipment.  The periodic inspection and test
must include an external and internal inspection and a sustained air pressure leak test, unless
exempted. For tanks that show evidence of damage or corrosion, an exceptional inspection and
test is mandated.  The extent of the inspection is dictated by the amount of damage or deterioration
of the portable tank. Specification-60 tanks are further tested by filling them with water.
Specification-IM or Specification-UN portable tanks must also be hydrostatically tested.  Any tank
that fails a test may not return to service until it is repaired and retested. An approval agency must
witness the retest and certify the tank for return to service.  The date of the last pressure test and
visual inspection must be clearly marked on each IM or UN portable tank.  A written record of the
dates and results  of the tests, including the name and address of the person performing the test, is
to be retained by the tank owner or authorized agent.

       Requirements for retest and inspection of Intermediate Bulk Containers (IBCs) are specified
in 49 CFR 180.352. Requirements depend on the IBC shell material. For metal, rigid plastic, and
composite IBCs, they include a leakproof test and external visual inspection every 2.5 years from
the date of manufacture or repair.  They also require an internal inspection every 5 years to ensure
that the IBC is free from damage and capable of withstanding the applicable conditions.  Flexible,
fiberboard, or wooden IBCs must be visually inspected prior to first use and permitted reuse.
Records of each test must be kept until the next test, or for at least 2.5 years from the date of the
last test.

       Design standards and specifications for initial qualification and reuse performance testing for
portable tanks, drums, and IBCs are contained in 49 CFR part 178, Specifications for Packaging.
See  www.access.qpo.gov/cfr.

7.5.13 FAA Advisory Circular 150/5230-4A - Aircraft Fuel Storage, Handling, and Dispensing
       on Airports

       FAA  Advisory Circular 150/5230-4A - Aircraft Fuel Storage, Handling, and Dispensing on
Airports28 identifies standards and procedures for storage, handling, and dispensing of aviation fuel
on airports.  The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)  recommends the standards and procedures
referenced in the Advisory Circular (AC) for all airports.  The FAA accepts these standards as one
means of complying with 14 CFR Part 139, Certification of Airports, as it pertains to fire safety in the
  28 FAA Advisory Circular 150/5230-4A, "Aircraft Fuel Storage, Handling, and Dispensing on Airports," Federal Aviation
  Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, June 18, 2004.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency        7-37                      Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
safe storage, handling, and dispensing of fuels used in aircraft on airports but not in terms of quality
control. Although airports that are not certificated under 14 CFR part 139 are not required to
develop fuel safety standards, the FAA recommends that they do so.

       This AC is not intended to replace airport procedures developed to meet requirements
imposed because of the use of special equipment, nor to replace local regulations. For specific
provisions, the other standards that are referenced in this AC are:

       *      For fuel storage, handling  and dispensing, the National Fire Prevention Association's
             "Standard for Aircraft Fuel Servicing"
             For refueling and quality control procedures, the National Air Transportation
             Association's "Refueling and Quality Control Procedures for Airport Service and
             Support Operations." This provides information about fuel safety, types of aviation
             fuels, fueling vehicle safety, facility inspection procedures, fueling procedures, and
             methods for handling fuel spills. API also publishes documents pertaining to
             refueling and facility specifications.

The AC also requires fuel safety training for airports certificated under 14 CFR part 139.
(See http://www.faa.gov/arp/pubiications/acs/5230-4A.pdf.)

7,5.14 FAA Advisory Circular 150/5210-20 - Ground Vehicle Operations on Airports

       FAA Advisory Circular 150/5210-20 - Ground Vehicle Operations on Airports29 provides
"guidance to airport operators in developing training programs for safe ground vehicle operations
and pedestrian control on the airside of an airport." Specifically, this advisory circular provides
recommended operating procedures accompanied by two appendices containing samples of the
training curriculum and training manual. With regard to the transportation and storage of oil, the
vehicle operator requirements on the airside of an airport require that "no fuel truck shall be brought
into, stored, or parked within 50 feet of a  building. Fuel trucks must not be parked within 10 feet
from other vehicles." (See http://www.faa.oov/arp/ACs/5210-20.pdn

7.5.15 Suggested Minimum Requirements for a PE-Developed Site-Specific Integrity Testing
       Program (Hybrid Testing Program)

       Although EPA refers to  certain industry standards for inspection and testing, it does not
require that inspections and tests be performed according to a specific standard. The PE may use
industry standards along with other good engineering principles to develop a customized inspection
and testing program for the facility (a "hybrid inspection program"), considering the equipment type
and condition, characteristics of products stored  and handled at the facility, and other site-specific
factors.
  29 FAA Advisory Circular 150/5210-20, "Ground Vehicle Operations on Airports," Federal Aviation Administration, U.S.
  Department of Transportation, June 21, 2002.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency        7-38                      Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
                                                 Chapter 7: Inspection, Evaluation, and Testing
       For example, a hybrid testing program may be developed in cases where no specific
industry inspection standard exists to date, as is the case for tanks that contain certain products
such as animal fats and vegetable oils, asphalt, or oils that have a specific gravity greater than 1.0.
Although there are no industry standards specific to integrity testing of bulk storage containers
containing vegetable oils at this time, some facilities with large animal fat and vegetable oil tanks
follow API 653. Additionally, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) sets requirements for
food-grade oils, which would need to be  followed in addition to EPA's integrity testing requirements.

       The following provide recommendations of the minimum elements for a hybrid inspection
program.

For shop-built tanks:

              Visually inspect exterior of tank;
              Evaluate external pitting;
              Evaluate "hoop  stress and longitudinal  stress risks" where corrosion of the shell is
              present;
              Evaluate condition  and operation of appurtenances;
       •       Evaluate welds;
              Establish corrosion rates and determine the inspection interval and suitability for
              continued service;
              Evaluate tank bottom where it is in contact with ground and no cathodic protection is
              provided;
       •       Evaluate the structural integrity of the foundation;
              Evaluate anchor bolts in areas where required; and
              Evaluate the tank to determine it is hydraulically sound and not leaking.

For field-erected tanks:

              Evaluate foundation;
              Evaluate settlement;
              Determine safe  product fill height;
              Determine shell corrosion rate and remaining life;
              Determine bottom corrosion rate and remaining life;
              Determine the inspection  interval and suitability for continued  service;
              Evaluate all welds;
              Evaluate coatings and linings;
              Evaluate repairs for risk of brittle fracture; and
       •       Evaluate the tank to determine it is hydraulically sound and not leaking.

       EPA suggests that an appropriately trained and qualified inspector conduct a hybrid
inspection and provide a detailed  report of the findings.  The qualifications of the tank inspector will
depend on the condition and circumstances of the tank (e.g., size, field-erected or shop-built), and
an inspector should only certify an inspection to the extent he/she is qualified to do so. A registered

U.S. Environmental Protection  Agency        7-39                      Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
PE may be able to perform the hybrid inspection, but could also have a certified inspector (e.g., STI
or API) complete the inspection. Either way, the hybrid inspection should be reviewed and certified
by a PE in accordance with §112.3(d). Note that industry inspection standards require the
inspector's certification number on these reports.

       EPA also recommends that the hybrid inspection  program include frequent (e.g., monthly),
visual examinations of the tank by  the tank owner. Such an examination may include the following
elements:

       •      Foundation: Structurally sound and there is adequate drainage away from tank
             (yes/no)
             Tank bottom: Shows visible signs of leakage (yes/no)
             Tank shell: Shows distortions, visible leaks, seepage at seam, external corrosion
             (yes/no)
       •      Condition of coatings and insulation (satisfactory/unsatisfactory)
       •      Roof: Hatches securely closed, roof distortions, visible signs of holes, external
             corrosion, adequate drainage (yes/no)
             Condition of coatings and insulation (satisfactory/unsatisfactory)
             Appurtenances: Thief hatch seals property; thief hatch operational; vent valve
             operational; drain and sample valves do not leak; piping properly supported off tank;
             stairways, ladders, and walkways sound (yes/no)
             Miscellaneous: Cathodic protection and automatic tank gauging is operational, tank
             area is clean of trash and vegetation (yes/no)

The inspector may review checklists used by facility personnel to conduct the frequent (e.g.,
monthly) inspections.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
7-40
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
                                                Chapter 7: Inspection, Evaluation, and Testing
Table 7-5 summarizes the facility components covered by select industry standards and
recommended practices for tanks, valves, pipes, and appurtenances. Additional standards and/or
manufacturers' standards may also apply. The recommended standards for facility personnel to
use for inspecting and testing at a particular facility would be specified in the SPCC Plan by the PE
preparing the Plan. All actions (e.g., visual inspection or testing) performed by facility personnel
must be appropriately documented and maintained in permanent facility records as per§112.7(e).

Table 7-5.  Checklist  summary of industry standards for inspection, evaluation, and testing.
Facility Components) Covered in Standard or
Recommended Practice
New equipment
Equipment that has been in service
Shop-built AST
Field-erected AST
Plastic tanks
Container supports or foundation
Buried metallic storage tank
Tank car or tank truck
Diked area
Aboveground valves, piping, and appurtenances
Underground piping
Offshore valves, piping, and appurtenances
Steam return and exhaust lines
Field drainage systems, oil traps, sumps, and/or
skimmers
Potentially Relevant Standards and
Recommended Practices
CO
If)
CD
1

•
•
•

•








_8
1- Q.
W W

•
•

•
•


•
•




o
r-
m
1

•







•
•



in
r-~
in
CL
cr
5

•
•
•

•



•




•t
i-~
in
CL
C£
I

•







•
•



K
>r*
1
•
•
•
•

•








o
t—
E
<
•
•







•




ro
ro
CD
111
1
•








•




TJ-
ro
CD
UJ
1
•
•







•

•


* Recommended practice.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
7-41
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
Table 7-6, tank inspection checklist, provides an example of the type of information that may be
included on an owner/operator-performed inspection checklist.

Table 7-6. Tank inspection checklist (from Appendix F of 40 CFR part 112).
1.






II.






III.






Check tanks for leaks, specifically looking for:
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
Drip marks;
Discoloration of tanks;
Puddles containing spilled or leaked material;
Corrosion;
Cracks; and
Localized dead vegetation.
Check foundation for:
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
Cracks;
Discoloration;
Puddles containing spilled or leaked material;
Settling;
Gaps between tank and foundation; and
Damage caused by vegetation roots.
Check piping for:
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
Droplets of stored material;
Discoloration;
Corrosion;
Bowing of pipe between supports;
Evidence of stored material seepage from valves or seals; and
Localized dead vegetation.
US. Environmental Protection Agency
7-42
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
                              CWA§§311(j)(l)(c)
Summary:
The President is authorized to issue regulations establishing procedures, methods,
equipment, and other requirements to prevent discharges of oil from vessels and facilities.
Rule Text:
0) National Response System

       (1)  In general
              Consistent with the National Contingency Plan required by subsection
              (c)(2) of this section, as soon as practicable after October 18,1972, and
              from time to time thereafter, the President shall issue regulations
              consistent with maritime safety and with marine and navigation laws
              (c)
                     establishing procedures, methods, and equipment and other
                     requirements for equipment to prevent discharges of oil and
                     hazardous substances from vessels and from onshore facilities and
                     offshore facilities, and to contain such discharges...

-------

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                                 Pr. 112
engine on a public vessel) and any dis-
charges of such oil  accumulated in the
bilges of a vessel discharged in compli-
ance  with MARPOL 73/78, Annex  I, as
provided in 33 CFR part 151, subpart A;
  (b)  Other discharges of oil permitted
under MARPOL 73/78.  Annex 1, as pro-
vided in 33 CFR part. 151, subpart A; and
  (c)  Any  discharge of  oil explicitly
permitted by the Administrator in con-
nection with  research,  demonstration
projects, or studies relating to the pre
vention. control, or  abatement of oil
pollution.
|61 FR 7421, Feb. 28. 1996]

$110.6  Notice.
  Any person in charge of a vessel or of
an onshore or offshore facility shall, as
soon as he or she has knowledge of any
discharge  of oil from such vessel or fa
cility in violation of section 311(b)(3) of
the Act,   immediately notify the  Na-
tional Response Center (NRC) (800-424
8802; in the Washington, DC metropoli
tan area, 202-426-2675). If direct report-
ing to the NRC is not practicable, re
ports may be made to the Coast Guard
or EPA predesignated On-Scetie Coordi
nator (OSC)  for the  geographic  area
where the discharge occurs.  All  such
reports shall  be promptly  relayed to
the NRC.  If it is  not possible to notify
the NRC or the predesignated OCS im-
mediately, reports may be made imme
diately  to  the   nearest  Coast Guard
unit,   provided   that   the  person  in
charge of  the vessel or onshore or off-
shore facility notifies the NRC as soon
as possible. The  reports shall  be made
in accordance with such  procedures as
the Secretary of Transportation  may
prescribe.  The procedures for  such no-
tice are set forth in U.S. Coast Guard
regulations, 33 CFR part  153, subpart B
and in the National Oil and Hazardous
Substances    Pollution   Contingency
Plan, 40 CFR part 300, subpart E.
(Approved  by the Office of Management ami
Budget under control number 2050-0046)
|52 FR 10719, Apr. 2. 1987. Redesignated and
amended at 61 FR  7421. Feb. 2». 19%; 61 FR
14032, Mar. 29. 1996)
     PART  112—OIL POLLUTION
             PREVENTION
Sec.
Subpart A—Applicability,  Definitions, and
    General Requirements For All Facilities
    and All Types of Oils

112.1 General applicability.
112.2 Definitions.
112.3 Requirement to prepare and  imple-
   ment a Spill  Prevention,  Control, and
   Countermeasure Plan.
112.4 Amendment of Spill Prevention, Con-
   trol, and  Countermeasure  Plan  by Re-
   gional Administrator.
112.5 Amendment of Spill Prevention. Con-
   trol, and Countermeasure Plan by owners
   or operators.
112.6 [Reserved]
112.7 General requirements for Spill Preven-
   tion,   Control.  and   Countermeasure
   Plans.

Subpart  B—Requirements  for  Petroleum
    Oils and Non-Petroleum  Oils,  Except
    Animal  Fats  and Oils and Greases,
    and  Fish and Marine  Mammal Oils;
    and  Vegetable  Oils  (Including  Oils
    from Seeds, Nuts, Fruits, and Kernels)

112.8 Spill  Prevention,  Control, and Coun-
   termeasure Plan  requirements for on-
   shore facilities (excluding production fa-
   cilities).
112.9 Spill  Prevention.  Control, and Coun-
   lermeasure Plan  requirements for on-
   shore oil production facilities.
112,10 Spill Prevention, Control, and Cciun-
   termeasure Plan  requirements for on-
   shore oil drilling and workover facilities.
112.11 Spill Prevention, Control, and Cciun
   terrneasure Plan  requirements for off
   share   oil   drilling,   production,  or
   workover facilities.

Subpart C—Requirements  for Animal Fats
    and Oils and Greases, and Fish and
    Marine Mammal Oils; and for  Vege-
    table Oils, Including  Oils from Seeds,
    Nuts, Fruits and Kernels

112.12 Spill Prevention, Control, and Coun-
   termeasure Plan  requirements for on-
   shore facilities (excluding production fa
   cilities).
112.13 Spill Prevention, Control, and Cciun-
   tenneasure Plan  requirements for on-
   shore oil production facilities,
112.14 Spill Prevention, Control, and Coun-
   tenneasure Plan  requirements for on-
   shore oil drilling and workover facilities.
                                        19

-------
§112.1

112.15  Spill Prevention, Control, and Coun-
   termeasure  Plan  requirements for  off-
   shore   oil   drilling.   production,   or
   workover facilities.

   Subpart D—Response Requirements

112.20  Facility response plans.
112.21  Facility  response training and drills/
   exercises.
APPENDIX A TO PART 112—MEMORANDUM  OF
   UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE SECRETARY
   OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE ADMINIS-
   TRATOR OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTEC-
   TION AGENCY
APPENDIX B TO PART 112—MEMORANDUM  OF
   UNDERSTANDING AMONG THK SECRETARY
   OF THE INTERIOR.  SECRETARY OF TRANS
   PORTATION,  AND ADMINISTRATOR  OF THE
   ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
APPENDIX C TO PART 112- SUBSTANTIAL HARM
   CRITERIA
APPENDIX D TO PART 112—DETERMINATION OF
   A WORST CASE DISCHARGE PLANNING VOL-
   UME
APPENDIX  E  TO PART  HZ—DETERMINATION
   AND EVALUATION OF  REQUIRED  RESPONSE
   RESOURCES   FOR   FACILITY   RESPONSE
   PLANS
APPENDIX F TO PART 112—FACILITY-SPECIFIC
   RESPONSE PLAN
  AUTHORITY: 33 U.S.C. 1251 et *«j.; 33 U.S.C.
2720; E.O.  12777 (October 18, 1991), 3 CFR, 1991
Comp.. p. 351.
  SOURCE; 38 FR 34165, Dec. 11. 1973, unless
otherwise noted.
  EDITORIAL NOTE: Nomenclature changes to
part 112 appear  at 65 FR 40798, June 30, 2000.

Subpart  A—Applicability,   Defini-
    tions,  and  General  Require-
     ments for All Facilities  and All
    Types of Oils

  SOURCE: 67 FR 47HO. July 17, 2002, unless
otherwise noted.

1112.1 General applicability.
  (a)(l)  This  part establishes  proce-
dures, methods, equipment, and other
requirements  to pi-event  the discharge
of oil from non-transportation-related
onshore  and  offshore facilities into  or
upon  the navigable   waters  of the
United States or adjoining shorelines,
or into or upon the waters of the con-
tiguous zone,  or in connection with ac-
tivities under the Outer Continental
Shelf Lands Act or the Deepwater Port
Act of 1974, or that may affrct natural
resources  belonging  to, appertaining
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-05 Edition)

to, or under the exclusive management
authority of the United States (includ-
ing  resources  under  the  Magnuson
Fishery Conservation aiid Management
Act).
  (2) As used in this part, words in the
singular also include the  plural and
words in the masculine gender also in-
clude the feminine  and vice versa,  as
the case may require.
  (b) Except as provided in paragraph
(d) of this section, this part applies to
any  owner or operator of a non-trans-
portal ion related  onshore  or  offshore
facility engaged in drilling, producing,
gathering, storing, processing,  refining,
transferring,  distributing,   using,  or
consuming oil and oil products, which
due to its location, could reasonably be
expected to discharge oil in quantities
that may be  harmful, as described  in
part 110 of this chapter, into or upon
the  navigable waters  of  the United
States or adjoining shorelines, or into
or upon the waters of the contiguous
zone, or in  connection with activities
under  the  Outer  Continental  Shelf
Lands  Act or the Deepwater Port Act
of 1974, or that  may affect natural re-
sources belonging to, appertaining to,
or under the exclusive management au-
thority of the United Stales (including
resources under the Magnuson Fishery
Conservation  and  Management  Act)
that has oil  In:
  (1) Any aboveground container;
  (2) Any completely buried tank as de-
fined In §112.2;
  (3) Any container that  is  used for
standby  storage, for seasonal storage,
or for temporary storage, or not other-
wise "permanently  closed" as defined
in §112.2;
  (4) Any "bunkered  tank" or "par-
tially buried tank" as defined  in §112.2,
or any container in a vault, each of
which  is considered  an aboveground
storage container for purposes of this
part.
  (c) As provided  in section 313 of the
Clean Water Act  (CWA), departments,
agencies, and instrumentalities of the
Federal government are subject to this
part to the same extent as  any person.
  (d) Except as provided in paragraph
(f) of this section,  this part  does not
apply to:
  (1) The owner or operator of any fa-
cility, equipment, or operation that is
                                      20

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                               §112.1
not subject to the jurisdiction of the
Environmental   Protection   Agency
(EPA) under section 3110)(D(C) of the
CWA, as follows:
  (i) Any onshore or offshore facility,
that due to its location, could not rea
sonably  be expected  to  have a  dis-
charge as described  in paragraph (b)  of
this section. This determination must
be based solely upon  consideration  of
the geographical and  location aspects
of the facility  (such  as proximity  to
navigable  waters or  adjoining shore-
lines, land contour,  drainage, etc.) arid
must exclude  consideration of man-
made features such as dikes, equipment
or other structures, which may serve
to restrain, hinder, contain, or other-
wise  prevent a  discharge as described
in paragraph (b) of this section.
  (ii)  Any equipment, or operation of a
vessel or  transportation-related  on-
shore or offshore facility which is sub-
ject to the authority and control of the
U.S. Department of Transportation,  as
defined in the Memorandum  of Under-
standing between  the   Secretary   of
Transportation  and the  Administrator
of EPA, dated November 24, 1971 (Ap-
pendix A of this part).
  (iii) Any equipment, or operation of a
vessel or onshore or  offshore facility
which is subject to the authority and
control  of the  U.S.  Department   of
Transportation or the  U.S. Department
of the Interior, as defined in the Memo
randum  of Understanding between the
Secretary of Transportation, the Sec-
retary of the Interior, and the Admin-
istrator of EPA, dated November 8, 1993
(Appendix B of this part).
  (2) Any facility which,  although oth-
erwise subject  to  the jurisdiction  of
EPA, meets both of the following  re-
quirements:
  (i) The completely huried storage ca-
pacity of the facility is 42,000 gallons  or
less of oil. For purposes of this exemp-
tion,  the completely buried storage ca-
pacity of a facility excludes the capac-
ity of a completely  buried tank, as de-
fined in §112.2.  and connected under-
ground piping,  underground ancillary
equipment, and containment systems,
that  is currently subject  to all of the
technical requirements  of part  280  of
this chapter or all of  the  technical re-
quirements of  a State  program ap
proved under  part 281 of this chapter.
The completely buried storage capac-
ity of a facility also excludes the ca-
pacity of a container that  is "perma-
nently closed," as defined in §112.2.
  (ii) The aggregate aboveground stor-
age capacity of the facility is 1,320 gal-
lons or less of oil. For purposes of this
exemption,  only containers of oil with
a capacity of 55 gallons or greater are
counted.  The  aggregate aboveground
storage capacity of a facility excludes
the  capacity of a  container that  is
"permanently  closed,"  as defined  in
§112.2.
  (3) Any offshore oil  drilling, produc-
tion, or workover facility that is sub-
ject to the notices  and regulations  of
the  Minerals Management Service,  as
specified in the Memorandum of Under-
standing  between   the   Secretary   of
Transportation, the Secretary of the
Interior,  and  the  Administrator   of
EPA, dated November 8, 1993 (Appendix
B of this part).
  (4)  Any completely  buried storage
tank,  as defined in §112.2,  and con-
nected   underground   piping,  under-
ground ancillary equipment, and con-
tainment systems, at any facility, that
is subject to all of the technical  re-
quirements of part 280 of this chapter
or  a State  program  approved  under
part  281 of  this chapter, except that
such a tank must be marked on the fa-
cility    diagram   as    provided    in
§H2.7(a)(3), if the facility is otherwise
subject to this part.
  (5) Any container with a storage ca-
pacity of less than 55 gallons of oil.
  (B) Any facility or part thereof used
exclusively for  wastewater treatment
and not used to satisfy any require-
ment of this part.  The production,  re-
covery, or recycling of oil is not waste-
water treatment for purposes of  this
paragraph.
  (c)  This  part  establishes  require-
ments for the preparation and imple-
mentation of Spill Prevention, Control,
and  Countermeasure   (SPCC)  Plans.
SPCC   Plans are  designed  to   com-
plement  existing   laws,  regulations,
rules,  standards,  policies,  and proce-
dures  pertaining to safety standards,
fire prevention, and pollution preven-
tion  rules.  The purpose of  an  SPCC
Plan is to form a comprehensive Fed-
eral/State   spill  prevention program
                                      21

-------
§112.2

that minimizes the potential for  dis-
charges. The SPCC Plan  must address
all relevant  spill  prevention,  control,
and countermeasures necessary at the
specific facility Compliance with  this
part does not  in any way  relieve the
owner or operator of an onshore or an
offshore facility from compliance with
other Federal, State, or local laws.
  (f) Notwithstanding paragraph (d) of
this section,  the  Regional  Adminis-
trator may require that  the  owner or
operator of any facility subject to the
jurisdiction of EPA under section 3t!(j)
of the CWA prepare and implement an
SPCC  Plan, or any applicable part, to
carry out the purposes of the CWA.
  (1)  Following a  preliminary deter-
mination, the  Regional Administrator
must provide a written notice to the
owner or operator stating the reasons
why he must prepare an SPCC Plan, or
applicable part. The Regional  Adminis-
trator must send such notice to the
owner or operator by certified mail or
by personal delivery. If  the  owner or
operator is a corporation, the Regional
Administrator must also mail a copy of
such notice to the registered agent, if
any and if known, of the corporation in
the State where the facility is located.
  (2) Within 30 days of receipt of such
written notice, the owner or operator
may provide information  and data and
may consult with the Agency about the
need to prepare an SPCC Plan, or appli-
cable part.
  (3) Within 30 days following the time
under paragraph (b)(Z)  of this section
within which  the  owner or  operator
may provide information  and data and
consult  with  the  Agency about  the
need to prepare an SPCC Plan, or appli-
cable part, the Regional Administrator
must  make a  final determination re-
garding whether the owner or operator
is required  to prepare  and implement
an SPCC Plan, or applicable part.  The
Regional Administrator must send the
final determination to the owner or op-
erator by certified mail or by personal
delivery. If the owner or operator is a
corporation,  the   Regional  Adminis-
trator must also mail a copy of the
final  determination  to the registered
agent, if any and If known, of the cor-
poration in the State where the facility
is located.
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-05 Edition)

  (4)  If  the  Regional Administrator
makes a  final determination that an
SPCC Plan, or applicable part, is nec-
essary, the owner or operator must pre-
pare the Plan, or applicable part, with-
in six months of that final determina-
tion and implement the Plan, or  appli-
cable part, as  soon  as possible, but not
later than one year after the Regional
Administrator  has  made a final deter-
mination.
  (5) The owner or operator may appeal
a final determination made by the Re-
gional Administrator  requiring prepa-
ration and implementation of an  SPCC
Plan, or  applicable  part,  under this
paragraph. The owner or operator must
make the appeal to the Administrator
of EPA within 30 days of receipt of the
final  determination  under  paragraph
(b)(3) of this section from the Regional
Administrator   requiring  preparation
and/or implementation  of  an  SPCC
Plan, or applicable  part. The owner or
operator must send a complete copy of
the  appeal  to  the  Regional  Adminis-
trator at the time he  makes the appeal
to the Administrator. The appeal must
contain a clear and concise statement
of the issues and points of fact in the
case. In the appeal, the owner or oper-
ator may  also provide additional  infor-
mation.  The   additional  information
may be from any person. The Adminis-
trator may request  additional informa-
tion from  the  owner or operator. The
Administrator must render a decision
within 60  days of receiving the appeal
or additional information submitted by
the owner or  operator and must serve
the owner or operator with the decision
made in the appeal in the manner de-
scribed in paragraph  (f)(l) of this sec-
tion.

§112.2 Definitions.
  For the  purposes of this part:
  Adverse  weather means weather condi-
tions that  make  it difficult for re-
sponse  equipment  and personnel  to
clean up or remove  spilled oil, and that
must be  considered  when  identifying
response systems and equipment in  a
response plan for the applicable oper-
ating environment.  Factors to consider
include  significant  wave  height  as
specified in Appendix E to this part (as
appropriate),  ice conditions,  tempera-
tures,  weather-related visibility, and
                                     22

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                               §112.2
currents within the area in which the
systems  or equipment Is intended to
function.
  Alteration means any work on a con-
tainer  involving  cutting,  burning,
welding,  or heating  operations  that
changes  the  physical  dimensions  or
configuration of the container.
  Animal fat means  a non-petroleum
oil. fat, or grease  of animal, fish, or
marine mammal origin.
  Breakout tank means a container used
to relieve surges in an oil pipeline sys-
tem or to  receive and  store oil trans-
ported by a pipeline for reinjection and
continued transportation  by pipeline.
  Bulk storage container means any con-
tainer used  to store oil.  These  con-
tainers are used for purposes including,
but riot limited  to. the storage of oil
prior  to use, while being  used, or prior
to  further  distribution in  commerce.
Oil filled electrical, operating, or man
ufacturing  equipment  is not a  bulk
storage container.
  Bunkered tank  means  a container
constructed or placed in the ground by
cutting the earth and  re-covering the
container in a  manner that breaks the
surrounding natural grade,  or that lies
above grade, and is covered with earth,
sand,  gravel,  asphalt,  or other mate-
rial. A bunkered tank is  considered an
aboveground storage  container for pur-
poses  of this part.
  Completely buried  tank means  any
container completely below grade and
covered with earth,  sand,  gravel,  as-
phalt,  or other material.  Containers in
vaults,  bunkered tanks, or  partially
buried tanks  are  considered  above-
ground storage containers for purposes
of this part.
  Complex means a facility possessing a
combination of transportation-related
and non-transportation related compo-
nents that  is subject to the jurisdiction
of more than one Federal agency under
section 311(j) of the CWA.
  Contiguous zone, means the zone  es-
tablished by the United  States under
Article 24 of the Convention of the Ter-
ritorial Sea and Contiguous '/.one, that
is contiguous to the territorial sea and
that extends nine miles  seaward  from
the outer limit of the territorial area.
  Contract   or  other  approved means
means:
  (1) A written contractual agreement
with an oil spill  removal organization
that identifies and  ensures  the avail-
ability of the necessary personnel and
equipment within appropriate response
times; and/or
  (2) A written  certification   by the
owner or  operator that the necessary
personnel  and  equipment  resources,
owned  or operated by the   facility
owner or operator, are  available to re-
spond  to  a  discharge  within  appro-
priate response times; and/or
  (3) Active membership in a local or
regional oil spill removal organization
that has  identified and ensures  ade-
quate access through such membership
to necessary personnel and equipment
to respond to a discharge within appro-
priate response times  in the specified
geographic area; and/or
  (4) Any  other  specific arrangement
approved  by  the  Regional Adminis
trator upon request  of the owner or op
erator.
  Discharge includes, but is not  limited
to,  any   spilling,   leaking,  pumping,
pouring, emitting, emptying, or dump-
ing of oil, but excludes discharges in
compliance with a  permit under sec-
lion 402 of the CWA; discharges result
Ing from  circumstances identified, re-
viewed,  and made a part of the public
record with respect  to  a permit issued
or modified  under  section 402  of the
CWA, and subject  to  a condition in
such permit; or  continuous  or  antici-
pated intermittent  discharges  from a
point source, identified  in a permit or
permit application under section 402 of
(he CWA,  that are caused by events oc
cuiTing within the scope of relevant op
crating or treatment systems. Hor pur-
poses of this part, the term discharge
shall not  include any discharge of oil
that is authorized  by  a permit  issued
under section 13  of the River and Har-
bor Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. 407).
  Facility means  any mobile or fixed.
onshore or offshore building, structure,
installation,  equipment, pipe, or pipe-
line  (other than a  vessel or a public
vessel) used  in oil  well drilling  oper
ations. oil production,  oil refining, oil
storage, oil gathering, oil  processing,
oil transfer, oil distribution, and waste
treatment, or in which oil is used, as
described  in  Appendix  A to this  part.
The boundaries of a facility depend 011
                                     23

-------
§112.2

several  site specific factors, including,
but not limited  l.o.  the ownership  or
operation of buildings, structures, and
equipment on  the same site  and the
types of activity at: the site.
  Fish and wildlife and sensitive environ-
ments means areas that may be identi-
fied  by their legal designation or  by
evaluations of Area Committees (for
planning) or members of the Federal
On-Scene Coordinator's spill  response
structure  (during  responses}.  These
areas may include wetlands,  National
arid State parks,  critical habitats for
endangered or  threatened species, wil-
derness  and natural  resource  areas,
marine  sanctuaries and estuarine re-
serves,  conservation areas, preserves,
wildlife  areas,  wildlife  refuges,  wild
and  scenic  rivers, recreational  areas,
national  forests.   Federal  and   State
lands that are  research national areas,
heritage  program areas,  land  trust
areas,  and  historical  and  archae-
ological sites arid parks. These  areas
may also include unique habitats such
as aquaculture sites and agricultural
surface  water  intakes,  bird  nesting
areas,  critical   biological   resource
areas,  designated  migratory  routes,
and designated seasonal habitats.
  Injury means a  measurable adverse
change, either long-  or short-term,  in
the chemical or physical quality or the
viability  of a natural  resource result-
ing either directly or  indirectly from
exposure to a discharge, or exposure  to
a product of reactions resulting from a
discharge.
  Maximum  extent  practicable means
within  the  limitations used to deter-
mine oil  spill  planning resources and
response  times for on-water recovery,
shoreline protection,  and  cleanup for
worst case  discharges from  onshore
non-transportation-related facilities  in
adverse   weather.  It  includes • the
planned capability  to respond  to   a
worst case discharge in adverse weath-
er, as contained in a response plan that
meets the requirements in $112.20 or in
a specific plan approved  by  the Re-
gional Administrator.
  Navigable waters means the waters of
the United States, including the  terri-
torial seas.
  (1) The term includes:
  (i) All waters that arc currently used,
were  used in the  past, or may be sus-
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-05 Edition)

ceptible to use in interstate or foreign
commerce, including all waters subject
to the ebb and flow of the tide;
  (ii)  All  interstate waters,  including
interstate wetlands;
  (iii) All other waters  such as intra-
state  lakes, rivers, streams (including
intermittent    streams),    mudflats,
sandflats,  wetlands, sloughs,  prairie
potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes, or
natural ponds,  the use, degradation, or
destruction of which could affect inter-
state  or foreign  commerce  including
any such vvaters:
  (A)  That  are or  could be used  by
interstate or foreign travelers for rec-
reational or other purposes: or
  (B)  From which fish or shellfish are
or could be taken and sold in interstate
or foreign commerce; or,
  (C)  That, are  or could  be used for in-
dustrial  purposes  by  industries  in
interstate commerce;
  (iv)  All impoundments of waters oth-
erwise defined  as  waters of the United
States under this section;
  (v) Tributaries of waters identified in
paragraphs  (l)(i)  through (iv)  of this
definition;
  (vi)  The territorial sea; and
  (vii) Wetlands  adjacent  to waters
(other than waters that are themselves
wetlands) identified in paragraph (I) of
this definition.
  (2) Waste treatment systems, includ-
ing treatment  ponds or lagoons  de-
signed to meet the requirements of the
CWA  (other  than cooling ponds which
also  meet  the  criteria  of this defini-
tion)  are  not  waters  of the United
States. Navigable waters  do not in-
clude  prior  converted cropland.  Not-
withstanding the determination of an
area's status as  prior converted  crop-
land by any  other Federal agency, for
the purposes of the CWA, the final au-
thority regarding CWA jurisdiction re-
mains with EPA.
  Non-petroleurn oil  means oil  of  any
kind  that  is not  petroleum-based, in-
cluding but not limited  to:  Fats,  oils,
and greases of animal, fish, or marine
mammal origin; and vegetable oils, in-
cluding oils  from seeds,  nuts,  fruits,
and kernels.
  Offshore facility means any facility of
any kind (other than a vessel or public
vessel) located in, on, or under any of
the navigable  waters  of the United
                                      24

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                               §112.2
States,  and  any facility of any kind
that is subject to the jurisdiction of
the United States and is located in. on,
or under any other waters.
  Oil means  oil of any kind or in any
form, including, but not  limited  to;
fats, oils, or greases of animal, fish, or
marine  mammal origin; vegetable oils,
including oils from seeds, nuts, fruits,
or kernels; and, other oils and greases,
including petroleum,  fuel  oil, sludge,
synthetic oils, mineral oils, oil refuse,
or oil  mixed with wastes  other than
dredged spoil.
  Oil Spill Removal Organization means
an  entity that provides oil  spill  re-
sponse resources, and includes any for
profit or  not-for-profit contractor, co-
operative, or   in-house  response  re-
sources that have been established in  a
geographic area to provide  required re
sponsc resources.
  Onshore facility means any facility of
any kind located  in, on, or under any
land within  the United  States,  other
than submerged lands.
  Owner or  operator means any person
owning or operating an onshore facility
or an offshore facility, and in  the case
of any abandoned offshore facility, the
person who owned or operated  or main-
tained  the  facility immediately  prior
to such abandonment.
  Partially buried tank means a storage
container that  is partially inserted or
constructed in the ground,  but not en-
tirely below grade, and not completely
covered  with earth,  sand,  gravel,  as-
phalt,  or other material.  A partially
buried  tank  is considered  an above-
ground  storage container for  purposes
of this part.
  Permanently  closed  means any con-
tainer or facility for which:
  (1) All liquid and sludge has been re-
moved  from each  container and con-
necting line; and
  (2) All  connecting  lines  and  piping
have been disconnected from  the con-
tainer  and blanked off, all valves (ex-
cept for ventilation valves) have been
closed   and  locked,  and  conspicuous
signs have  been posted  on each con-
tainer  stating that it is a permanently
closed container and  noting the date of
closure.
  Person includes an  individual,  firm,
corporation,  association,  or  partner-
ship.
  Petroleum oil means petroleum in any
form,  including  but  not  limited to
crude oil, fuel oil.  mineral oil, sludge,
oil refuse, and refined products.
  Production facility means all struc-
tures  (including but  not.  limited to
wells, platforms, or storage facilities),
piping (including but  riot limited to
flowlines or gathering lines), or equip-
ment  (including but  not  limited to
workover equipment, separation equip-
ment, or auxiliary  non-transportation-
related equipment) used in the produc-
tion, extraction,  recovery,  lifting, sta-
bilization, separation or treating of oil,
or associated  storage or measurement,
arid located in a single geographical oil
or gas field operated by a single  oper-
ator.
  Regional Administrator means the Re-
gional Administrator  of the  Environ-
mental Protection Agency,  in and for
the Region  in which the facility  is lo-
cated.
  Repair means any work necessary to
maintain or restore a container  to a
condition suitable for  safe operation,
other than that necessary for ordinary,
day to-day  maintenance to  maintain
the  functional  integrity  of the  con-
tainer and  that  does  not weaken the
container.
  Spill Prevention, Control, and Counter-
measure Plan;  SPCC Plan, or Plan means
the document required  by §112.3  that
details the  equipment,  workforce, pro-
cedures,  and steps  to prevent, control,
and provide adequate countermeasures
to a discharge.
  Storage capacity of a container means
the shell capacity of the container.
  Transportation-related  and non  trans-
portation related,  as applied to an on-
shore or offshore facility,  are defined
in the Memorandum of Understanding
between  the  Secretary  of Transpor-
tation and  the Administrator of the
Environmental   Protection   Agency,
dated November  24. 1971,  (Appendix A
of this part).
  United States means  the  States, the
District  of Columbia,  the  Common-
wealth of  Puerto  Rico,  the  Common-
wealth  of the  Northern  Mariana Is-
lands, Guam,  American  Samoa,  the
U.S.  Virgin Islands, arid the Pacific Is
land Governments.
  Vegetable  oil means a non-petroleum
oil or fat of vegetable origin, including
                                      25

-------
§112.3

but not limited to oils and fats derived
from plant seeds, nuts, fruits,  and ker-
nels.
  Vessel  means every description  of
watercraft or other artificial  contriv-
ance used, or capable of being used,  as
a means  of transportation  on water,
other than a public vessel.
  Wetlands means  those areas  that are
inundated or saturated by surface  or
groundwater at a frequency or  duration
sufficient to support, and  that under
normal circumstances do  support,  a
prevalence   of  vegetation   typically
adapted for life in saturated soil condi-
tions. Wetlands generally include playa
lakes,  swamps,  marshes,  bogs,  arid
similar areas such as sloughs, prairie
potholes,  wet  meadows,  prairie  river
overflows, mudflats, and natural ponds.
  Worst case discharge for an  onshore
non-transportation-related     facility
means  the  largest   foreseeable  dis-
charge in adverse  weather conditions
as determined using the worksheets  in
Appendix D to this part.

§112.3 Requirement to  prepare  and
    implement  a Spill  Prevention, Con-
    trol, and Counter-measure Plan.
  The  owner or operator  of an onshore
or offshore facility subject to  this sec-
tion must prepare  a Spill Prevention,
Control,   and  Countermeasure  Plan
(hereafter "SPCC Plan" or  "Plan),"  in
writing, and in accordance with §112.7,
and any other applicable section of this
part.
  (a) If your onshore or offshore  facil-
ity was In operation on  or before Au-
gust 16. 2002, you must maintain your
Plan, but must amend it, if necessary
to ensure compliance with this part, on
or before February 17. 2006. and  must
Implement  the amended  Plan as soon
as possible, but not later than August
18, 2006. If your onshore or offshore fa-
cility  becomes operational  after Au-
gust 16, 2002, through August  18.  2006,
and  could reasonably  be expected  to
have   a   discharge  as  described  in
§112.1(b),  you must prepare  a  Plan on
or before  August 18, 2006, and fully im-
plement It as soon as  possible, but not
later than August 18, 2006.
  (b) If you are the owner or  operator
of an onshore or offshore facility  that
becomes  operational after  August 18,
2006, and  could reasonably be  expected
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-05 Edition)

to have a  discharge  as described in
§li;M(b). you must prepare and imple-
ment a  Plan before you begin oper-
ations.
  (c) If  you are tho owner or operator
of an onshore or offshore mobile facil-
ity,  such  as an  onshore  drilling or
workover rig, barge mounted  offshore
drilling or  workover rig, or portable
fueling  facility, you must prepare, im-
plement, and maintain a facility Plan
as required by this section. You must
maintain your Plan, but must amend
and  implement  it, if necessary to en-
sure compliance with this  part, on or
before August 18,  2006. If your onshore
or  offshore  mobile  facility becomes
operational after  August 18, 2006,  and
could reasonably be expected to have a
discharge as described in §112.1(b), you
must prepare and Implement a Plan be-
fore you begin operations.  This provi-
sion does not require that you prepare
a new Plan each time you move the fa-
cility to a new site. The Plan may be a
general  Plan. When you move the  mo-
bile  or  portable facility, you must lo-
cate and install it  using the discharge
prevention  practices outlined  in  the
Plan for the  facility. The Plan is appli-
cable only while  the facility is in a
fixed  (non-transportation)  operating
mode.
  (d) A  licensed Professional Engineer
must review and certify a Plan for it to
be effective to satisfy the requirements
of this part.
  (1) By means of this certification the
Professional Engineer attests:
  (i) That  he is  familiar with  the re-
quirements of this part ;
  (ii) That he or his agent has visited
and examined the facility;
  (ili) That the Plan has been prepared
in accordance with  good engineering
practice, including consideration of ap-
plicable industry  standards, and with
the requirements of this part;
  (iv) Thai; procedures for required in-
spections and testing have been estab-
lished; and
  (v) That the Plan is adequate for the
facility.
  (2) Such certification shall in no way
relieve the owner or operator of a facil-
ity of his duty to prepare and fully im
plement such Plan in accoi'dance with
the requirements of this part.
                                      26

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                               §112.4
  (e) If you are the owner or operator
of a facility for which a Plan is  re-
quired under this section, you must:
  (1) Maintain  a complete copy of the
Plan  at  the facility if the  facility  is
normally attended at least four hours
per day, or at the nearest field office if
the facility is not so attended, and
  (2) Have the Plan available to the Re-
gional Administrator for on-site review
during normal working hours.
  (1) Extension of time. (I)  The Regional
Administrator may authorize an exten-
sion of time for the preparation  and
full implementation of a Plan, or  any
amendment thereto, beyond  the  lime
permitted  for the  preparation, imple-
mentation,  or  amendment of  a  Plan
under this part, when he finds that the
owner or operator of a facility subject
to this  section, cannot  fully  comply
with the requirements as  a result of ei-
ther nonavailability of qualified  per-
sonnel, or  delays  in construction or
equipment delivery beyond the control
and without the fault of such owner or
operator or his  agents or employees.
  (2) If you are an owner or operator
seeking  an extension  of time under
paragraph (0(0  of this  section,  you
may  submit a  written extension  re-
quest to  the Regional Administrator.
Your request must include:
  (i) A full explanation of the cause for
any such delay and the specific aspects
of the Plan affected by the delay;
  (ii) A full discussion of actions being
taken or contemplated to minimize or
mitigate such delay; and
  (in) A proposed time schedule for the
implementation of any  corrective ac-
tions being taken or contemplated, in-
cluding interim dates for completion of
tests or studies,  installation and oper-
ation of any necessary equipment, or
other preventive measures.  In  addition
you  may  present  additional  oral or
written statements in support  of your
extension request.
  (3) The submission of a written ex-
tension request under paragraph  (0(2)
of this section  does not relieve you of
your obligation to  comply with the re-
quirements of this part.  The Regional
Administrator  may request  a copy of
your Plan to evaluate the extension re-
quest. When  the  Regional  Adminis-
trator authorizes an extension  of time
for particular equipment or other  spe
cific aspects of the Plan, such exten-
sion does not affect your obligation to
comply with the requirements related
to other equipment or other specific as-
pects of the  Plan for  which the Re-
gional Administrator has not expressly
authorized an extension.

[67 FR 47140, July 17, 2002, as amended at 68
FR 1351. Jan.  9, 2B03; 68 FR 18*94, A[>r. 17.
2003; 69 FR 48798, Aug. 1!. 2004)

§112.4  Amendment of  Spill  Preven-
    tion, Control, and  Countermeasure
    Plan by Regional Administrator.
  If you are the owner or operator of a
facility subject to this part, you must:
  (a) Notwithstanding compliance with
§112.3, whenever your facility has dis-
charged more than 1,000 U.S. gallons of
oil in a single discharge as described in
§112.l(b),  or  discharged more  than 42
U.S. gallons  of oil in each of two dis-
charges as described in §112.1(b), occur-
ring within any twelve month period,
submit the  following  information to
the Regional  Administrator within 60
days  from the  time the facility be-
comes subject to this section:
  (1) Name of the facility;
  (2) Your name;
  (3) Location of the facility;
  (4) Maximum storage or handling ca-
pacity of the  facility and normal daily
throughput;
  (5)  Corrective  action  and counter-
measures you have taken,  including a
description of equipment repairs  and
replacements;
  (6) An adequate description of the fa-
cility, including maps, flow diagrams,
and topographical  maps, as necessary,
  (7) The cause of such discharge as de-
scribed in §112.1(b), including a failure
analysis of the system or subsystem in
which the failure occurred;
  (8)  Additional  preventive measures
you have  taken  or  contemplated to
minimize the possibility of recurrence;
and
  (9) Such other information as the Re-
gional Administrator  may reasonably
require pertinent  to the Plan or dis-
charge.
  (b) Take no action under this section
until it  applies to your  facility. This
section does not apply until the expira-
tion of the time permitted for the ini-
tial preparation and implementation of
                                      27

-------
§112.5

the Plan under §112.3, but not including
any amendments to the Plan.
  (c) Send to the appropriate agency or
agencies in charge of oil pollution con-
trol activities in the State in which the
facility is located a  complete  copy of
all information you provided to the Re-
gional Administrator under  paragraph
(a) of this section. Upon receipt of the
information such State agency or agen-
cies  may conduct a review and  make
recommendations to  (he Regional Ad-
ministrator as  to further procedures,
methods, equipment, and other require-
ments necessary to prevent and to con-
tain discharges from your facility.
  (d) Amend your Plan, if after review
by the  Regional Administrator of the
information  you submit under  para-
graph (a) of this section, or  submission
of information  to EPA by  the  State
agency  under paragraph  (c)  of this sec-
tion,  or after  on-site review of  your
Plan, the Regional  Administrator re-
quires that you do so.  The Regional
Administrator   may  require you  to
amend  your Plan if he finds  that, it
does not meet the  requirements of this
part or  that amendment is necessary to
prevent  and contain discharges  from
your facility.
  (e) Act. in accordance with this para-
graph  when  the  Regional Adminis-
trator proposes  by certified mail or by
personal delivery that you amend your
SPCC Plan. If the  owner or  operator is
a corporation,  he  must also notify by
mail the registered agent of such cor-
poration, if any and if known, in the
State in which  the facility is  located.
The   Regional  Administrator  must
specify  the  terms  of  such proposed
amendment.  Within  30 days from re-
ceipt of such notice, you may submit
written information, views,  and  argu-
ments  on  the  proposed amendment.
After considering all  relevant material
presented, the  Regional  Administrator
must either notify you of any amend-
ment required  or rescind the notice.
You must amend your Plan  as required
within 30 days after such notice, unless
the  Regional  Administrator, for  good
cause, specifies another  effective date.
You must implement the amended Plan
as soon as  possible, but not later than
six months after you  amend your Plan,
unless  the  Regional   Administrator
specifies another date.
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-05 Edition)

  (f)  If you appeal a decision made by
the Regional Administrator requiring
an amendment to an SPCC Plan, send
the appeal to the EPA Administrator
in writing within 30 days of receipt of
the notice from the Regional Adminis-
trator requiring the amendment under
paragraph (e) of this section. You must
send a complete copy of the appeal  to
the  Regional  Administrator  at  the
time you  make the appeal. The appeal
must contain a clear and concise state-
ment of the issues and points of fact in
the case.  It may  also  contain  addi-
tional information from you, or from
any  other person. The EPA Adminis-
trator may request additional informa-
tion from you. or from any other per-
son.   The  EPA  Administrator  must
render a decision within 60 days of re-
ceiving the appeal and must notify you
of his decision.

§112.5 Amendment  of  Spill Preven-
   tion, Control, and Countermeasure
   Plan by owners or operators.
  If you are the owner or operator of a
facility subject to this part, you must:
  (a) Amend the SPCC Plan for your fa-
cility in accordance  with the general
requirements in  §112.7, and with any
specific section of this part applicable
to your facility, when there is a change
in the facility design, construction, op-
eration, or  maintenance  that materi-
ally  affects  its  potential  for  a  dis-
charge as described in §HZ.l(b).  Exam-
ples   of  changes  that  may  require
amendment of the  Plan include, but
are not limited to:  commissioning  or
decommissioning  containers; replace-
ment, reconstruction, or movement of
containers;   reconstruction,  replace-
ment, or installation of piping systems;
construction or demolition that might
alter secondary   containment  struc-
tures; changes of product or service; or
revision of standard operation or main-
tenance procedures  at a  facility.  An
amendment made under this section
must be prepared within  six months,
and  implemented  as  soon as possible,
but not later than six months following
preparat ion of the amendment.
  (D) Notwithstanding compliance with
paragraph (a) of this section, complete
a review  and evaluation  of  the SPCC
Plan  at  least  once  every five years
from  the  date your facility becomes
                                     28

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                               §112.7
subject to this part; or, if your facility
was  in  operation on or before August
16, 2002, five years  from the date your
last  review  was required  under  this
part. As a  result  of this  review and
evaluation,   you  must  amend   your
SPCC Plan within six months of the re-
view to include more effective preven-
tion and control technology if the tech-
nology  has  been  field-proven at the
time  of the  review and  will signifi-
cantly reduce  the  likelihood of  a dis-
charge  as  described in §112.l(b)  from
the facility.  You must implement any
amendment as soon  as possible, but not
later than six  months following prepa-
ration of any amendment. You  must
document your completion of the  re-
view  and evaluation,  and must sign a
statement  as to  whether  you  will
amend  the  Plan, either at the begin-
ning or end of the Plan or in a log or an
appendix to the Plan.  The  following
words will suffice,  "1 have completed
review  and  evaluation of the  SPCC
Plan  for (name of  facility) on (date),
and will (will not) amend the Plan as a
result."
  (c) Have a  Professional Engineer cer-
tify  any technical amendment to your
Plan in accordance with §112.3(d).

§ 112.6  [Reserved]

§ 112.7  General requirements for Spill
    Prevention, Control, and  Counter-
    measure Plans.
  If you are the owner or operator of a
facility subject to  this part,  you  must
prepare a Plan in accordance with good
engineering practices. The Plan  must
have  the full approval of management
at a level of authority to  commit the
necessary resources to fully implement.
the Plan. You must prepare the Plan in
writing. If you do  not  follow the  se-
quence  specified in this section for the
Plan, you must prepare an equivalent
Plan  acceptable  to  the  Regional Ad-
ministrator that meets all of the appli-
cable requirements  listed  in  this part,
and you must supplement it with a sec
tion cross-referencing the  location of
requirements listed  in this part arid the
equivalent requirements in  the other
prevention plan. If the Plan  calls  for
additional   facilities or   procedures,
methods, or equipment not  yet  fully
operational,  you  must discuss   these
items in separate paragraphs, and must
explain separately the details of instal-
lation and operational start-up. As de-
tailed elsewhere in this section,  you
must also:
  (a)(l) Include a discussion of your fa-
cility's conformance with the require-
ments listed in this part.
  (2)  Comply  with  all  applicable re-
quirements listed  in  this  part. Your
Plan  may deviate  from the  require-
ments in  paragraphs (g),  (h)(2) and (3),
and (i) of this section  and the require
ments in subparts B and C of this part,
except the secondary  containment re-
quirements in paragraphs (c) and (h)(l)
of       this        section,       and
112.12(c)(ll),112.13(c)(2),   and  112.14(c),
where  applicable to a specific facility,
if you  provide  equivalent  environ-
mental  protection  by  some  other
means of spill prevention,  control, or
countermeasure. Where your Plan does
not conform to the applicable require-
ments  in paragraphs (g), (h)(2) and  (3),
and (i) of this section, or the require-
ments  of subparts B and C of this part,
except the secondary containment  re-
quirements  in paragraphs (c) and (h)(l)
of  this  section,  and  §§U2.8(c)(2),
                        12.13(c)(2), and
112.14(c), you must state the reasons for
nonconformance  in your  Plan and  de-
scribe in detail alternate methods and
how you will achieve equivalent envi-
ronmental protection.  If the Regional
Administrator determines  that   the
measures described in your Plan  do  not
provide equivalent environmental pro
tection,  he   may  require  that  you
amend your Plan, following the  proce
dures in§112.4(d)  and  (e).
  (3) Describe in your Plan the physical
layout of the facility and  include a fa-
cility diagram, which  must mark  the
location and contents of  each con-
tainer. The facility diagram must  in-
clude completely burled tanks that  are
otherwise exempted from the require-
ments of this part under § I12.1(d)(4).
The facility diagram  must also include
all  transfer  stations  and connecting
pipes.  You must also address in your
Plan:
  (i) The type of oil  in each container
and its storage capacity;
                                      29

-------
§112.7

  (ii)   Discharge  prevention  measures
including procedures for routine han-
dling of products (loading,  unloading,
and facility transfers, etc.);
  (iii)  Discharge or drainage  controls
such as secondary containment around
containers and other structures, equip-
ment,  and procedures for the control of
a discharge;
  (iv)  Countermeasures for discharge
discovery,  response, and cleanup (both
the facility's capability and those that
might  be required of a contractor);
  (v) Methods of disposal of recovered
materials in accordance with applica-
ble legal requirements;  and
  (vt) Contact list  and phone  numbers
for the facility  response coordinator,
National Response Center, cleanup con-
tractors with whom you have an agree-
ment for response, and all  appropriate
Federal, State, and local agencies who
must  be contacted in case of a dis-
charge as described in § 112.1 (b).
  (4) Unless you have submitted a  re-
sponse plan under §112.20,  provide  in-
formation and procedures in your Plan
to enable  a person  reporting  a dis-
charge as described in §112.l(b) to  re-
late  information on the exact address
or location and phone number of the fa-
cility;  the date  and time  of  the dis-
charge,  the  type  of  material  dis-
charged; estimates of  the total quan-
tity discharged; estimates of the quan-
tity    discharged  as   described   in
§112.1(b): the source of  the discharge; a
description of  all  affected  media; the
cause of the discharge;  any damages or
injuries  caused by the discharge;  ac-
tions being used to stop, remove, and
mitigate the effects of the discharge;
whether an evacuation may be needed;
and, the names of Individuals and/or or-
ganizations who have  also been con-
tacted.
  (5) Unless you have submitted a  re-
sponse plan under §112.20, organize por-
tions of the Plan describing  procedures
you will use when a discharge occurs in
a way  that will make them readily usa-
ble in an emergency,  and  include  ap-
propriate supporting material  as  ap-
pendices.
  (b) Where experience  indicates a rea-
sonable potential for equipment failure
(such  as loading or unloading equip-
ment,  tank overflow, rupture, or leak-
age,  or any other equipment known to
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-05 Edition)

be a source of a discharge), include  in
your Plan a prediction of the direction,
rate of flow, and total quantity of oil
which could be discharged from the fa-
cility as a result of each type of major
equipment failure.
  (c) Provide  appropriate containment
and/or    diversionary   structures   or
equipment to  prevent  a discharge  as
described in §112. !(b). The  entire con-
tainment system, including walls and
floor, must be capable of containing oil
and must  be  constructed so that any
discharge from a primary containment
system, such as a tank or pipe, will not
escape the containment system  before
cleanup  occurs. At a  minimum,  you
must use one of the  following preven-
tion systems or its equivalent:
  (1) For onshore facilities:
  (i) Dikes, berms, or  retaining  walls
sufficiently impervious to contain oil;
  (ii) Curbing;
  (iii)  Culverting,  gutters, or  other
drainage systems;
  (iv) Weirs, booms, or other barriers;
  (v) Spill diversion ponds;
  (vi) Ret€>ntion ponds; or
  (vii) Sorbent materials.
  (2) For offshore facilities:
  (i) Curbing or drip pans; or
  (ii) Sumps and collection systems.
  (d) If you determine that,  the instal-
lation of any of the structures or pieces
of equipment listed in  paragraphs  (c)
and   (h)(l)   of   this   section,   and
§§112.8(c)(2),    m.8
112.13(c)(2),  and 112.14(c)  to prevent a
discharge as described in §ll2.I(b) from
any onshore or offshore facility is not
practicable, you  must clearly  explain
in your  Plan why such  measures are
not practicable; for bulk storage con-
tainers,  conduct both periodic integ-
rity testing of the containers and peri-
odic integrity and  leak testing of the
valves and piping: and, unless you have
submitted  a  response  plan   under
§112.20, provide in  your  Plan the fol
lowing:
  (1) An  oil spill contingency plan fol
lowing the provisions of part 109 of this
chapter.
  (2) A written commitment of man
power, equipment, and  materials  re
quired to expeditiously control  and re
move any quantity of oil discharged
that may be harmful .
                                      30

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                               §112.7
  (e) Inspections, tests, and records. Con-
duct inspections  and tests required by
this part. In accordance with written
procedures that you or the certifying
engineer develop for the facility.  You
must keep these  written procedures
and  a record  of  the inspections  and
tests, signed by the appropriate super-
visor or inspector, with the SPCC Plan
for a period of three years. Records of
inspections and tests kept under usual
and customary business practices  will
suffice for purposes of this paragraph.
  (f) Personnel, training,  and discharge
prevention  procedures.  (1) At a min-
imum,  train   your  oil-handling  per-
sonnel in  the operation  and mainte-
nance  of equipment  to  prevent  dis-
charges; discharge procedure protocols;
applicable   pollution  control  laws,
rules, and regulations; general facility
operations; and, the contents of  the fa-
cility SPCC Plan.
  (2) Designate a person at each appli-
cable facility  who  is accountable  for
discharge prevention  and who  reports
to facility management.
  (3) Schedule and  conduct  discharge
prevention briefings for  your oil han-
dling personnel at least once a year to
assure adequate  understanding  of the
SPCC Plan for that facility. Such brief-
ings  must  highlight  and  describe
known  discharges   as   described  in
§112.1(b)  or  failures,  malfunctioning
components,  and  any  recently  devel-
oped precautionary measures.
  (g)  Security  (excluding  oil production
facilities).  (1) Fully  fence  each facility
handling, processing, or  storing  oil,
and  lock and/or  guard entrance gates
when the facility is not in production
or is unattended.
  (2) Ensure that  the master flow and
drain valves and  any other valves  per-
mitting direct outward flow of the con-
tainer's contents  to the  surface have
adequate  security  measures so that
they  remain  in  the closed position
when in  non-operating or non-standby
status.
  (3) Lock  the starter control on each
oil pump in the "off position  and lo-
cate it at a site accessible only to au-
thorized personnel when the pump is in
a non-operating or non-standby status.
  (4) Securely cap or blank-flange the
loading/unloading connections   of  oil
pipelines or facility piping when not in
service  or when in standby service for
an extended time.  This security prac-
tice  also  applies  to  piping  that  is
emptied of  liquid  content  either by
draining or by inert gas pressure.
  (5) Provide facility lighting commen-
surate with  the  type and location of
the facility that will assist in the:
  (i)  Discovery of discharges occurring
during hours of darkness, both by oper-
ating personnel, if present, and by non-
operating personnel  (the general pub-
lic, local police, etc.); and
  (ii)  Prevention of  discharges  occur-
ring through acts of vandalism.
  (h)  Facility tank  car and  tank truck
loading/unloading rack  (excluding off-
shore facilities). (1)  Where  loading/un
loading  area drainage  does  not flow
into  a  catchment  basin or  treatment
facility designed to handle discharges,
use a quick  drainage system  for tank
car or tank truck  loading and unload-
ing areas.  You must design any con-
tainment system to  hold at least the
maximum capacity of any single com-
partment of a  tank car or tank truck
loaded or unloaded  at the facility.
  (2) Provide an interlocked  warning
light, or physical barrier system, warn-
ing signs, wheel  chocks,  or vehicle
break interlock system in loading/un-
loading areas to  prevent vehicles from
departing before complete  disconnec-
tion  of  flexible  or fixed oil  transfer
lines.
  (3) Prior to filling and departure of
any tank car or tank truck,  closely in-
spect  for  discharges  the  lowermost
drain and all outlets of such  vehicles.
and if necessary, ensure that  they are
tightened, adjusted, or replaced to pre-
vent liquid discharge while in transit.
  (i)  If a field-constructed aboveground
container undergoes  a repair,  alter-
ation,  reconstruction, or a  change in
service  that might  affect the risk of  a
discharge or failure due to brittle frac-
ture or other catastrophe, or has dis-
charged oil or failed due to brittle frac-
ture  failure   or   other catastrophe,
evaluate the container for risk of dis-
charge or failure due to brittle fracture
or other catastrophe, and as  necessary,
take appropriate action.
  (j) In addition to  the minimal preven-
tion  standards  listed under  this sec-
tion, include in your Plan a complete
                                      31

-------
§112.8

discussion of coiiformiince with the ap-
plicable requirements and other effec-
tive discharge prevention and contain-
ment  procedures listed in this part or
any applicable  more stringent  State
rules, regulations, and guidelines.

Subpart B—Requirements for Pe-
    troleum  Oils  and Non-Petro-
    leum  Oils, Except Animal Fats
    and  Oils  and  Greases,  and
    Fish and Marine Mammal Oils;
    and Vegetable Oils (Including
    Oils from  Seeds,  Nuts,  Fruits,
    and Kernels)

  SOURCE: 67 FR 47146, July 17,  2002, unless
otherwise noted.

§112.8 Spill  Prevention, Control, and
   Countermeasure Plan requirements
   for  onshore  facilities   (excluding
   production facilities).
  If you are the owner or operator of an
onshore facility (excluding  a produc-
tion facility), you must:
  (a) Meet the general requirements for
the Plan listed under §112.7, and the
specific discharge prevention and con-
tainment procedures listed in this sec-
tion.
  (b)  Facility  drainage.  (1)  Restrain
drainage from diked storage areas  by
valves to prevent a discharge into the
drainage system  or  facility effluent
treatment  system, except where facil-
ity systems  are  designed  to control
such discharge.  You  may empty diked
areas  by pumps or ejectors; however,
you  must  manually activate  these
pumps or ejectors and must inspect the
condition of the  accumulation before
starting, to ensure  no oil will  be dis-
charged.
  (2) Use valves of manual, open-and-
closed design, for the drainage of diked
areas.  You may not  use flapper-type
drain valves to  drain diked areas.  If
your  facility drainage drains directly
into a watercourse and not  into an on-
site wastewater  treatment  plant, you
must    inspect   ami   may   drain
uncontaminated  retained stormwater,
as  provided  in  paragraphs (c)(3)(ii),
(iii), and (iv) of this section.
  (3) Design facility drainage systems
from undiked areas with a potential for
a discharge (such as where piping is  lo-
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-05 Edition)

cated  outside  containment walls  or
where tank truck discharges may occur
outside the  loading  area) to flow into
ponds,  lagoons, or catchment basins de-
signed  to retain oil or return it to the
facility.   You   must   not   locate
catchment basins in areas subject to
periodic flooding.
  (4) If facility drainage is not engi-
neered as in paragraph (b)(3) of this
section, equip the final discharge of all
ditches inside the facility with a diver-
sion system that would, in the event of
an uncontrolled discharge, retain oil in
the facility.
  (5) Where drainage waters are treated
in more  than one treatment unit and
such  treatment is  continuous,  and
pump transfer is needed,  provide two
"lift"  pumps and permanently install
at least  one of the pumps. Whatever
techniques you use, you must engineer
facility drainage systems to prevent a
discharge as described in §H2.1(b)  in
case there is an equipment failure or
human error at the facility.
  (c) Bulk storage containers. (I) Not use
a container for the storage of oil unless
its material and construction are com-
patible with the material  stored and
conditions of storage such  as pressure
and temperature.
  (2) Construct  all  bulk  storage con-
tainer  installations so that you provide
a secondary  means of containment  for
the entire capacity of the largest single
container and sufficient  freeboard  to
contain precipitation. You must ensure
that diked areas are sufficiently imper-
vious to contain discharged oil. Dikes,
containment curbs,  and pits are com-
monly  employed for this  purpose. You
may also use an  alternative system
consisting of a drainage trench enclo-
sure that must be arranged so that any
discharge will terminate and be safely
confined in  a facility catchment basin
or holding pond.
  (3)    Not    allow   drainage    of
uncontaminated  rainwater  from  the
diked area into a storm  drain or dis-
charge of an effluent into an open wa-
tercourse, lake, or pond, bypassing the
facility treatment system unless you:
  (i) Normally keep  the  bypass valve
sealed  closed.
  (II) Inspect the retained rainwater to
ensure that its presence will not cause
a discharge as described in § U2.1(b).
                                     32

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                               §112.8
  (iii) Open the bypass valve and reseal
it following drainage under responsible
supervision; and
  (iv) Keep adequate records of such
events,  for example,  any  records  re-
quired under permits issued in accord-
ance with  §§122.41(j)(2)  and 122.41(m)(3)
of this chapter.
  (4)  Protect  any completely buried
metallic storage tank  installed on or
after  January 10, 1974  from  corrosion
by  coatings  or  cathodic protection
compatible with local  soil conditions.
You must  regularly leak  test  such
completely  buried   metallic  storage
tanks.
  (5)  Not   use  partially  buried  or
bunkered metallic tanks for the stor-
age of oil, unless you protect the bur-
ied  section of the tank from corrosion.
You must  protect partially buried and
bunkered  tanks  from   corrosion  by
coatings or cathodic  protection  com-
patible with local soil conditions.
  (6) Test,  each aboveground  container
for  integrity on a regular schedule, and
whenever you make material repairs.
The frequency of and  type of testing
must  take into account container size
and design (such as floating roof, skid-
mounted, elevated, or partially buried).
You must combine  visual  inspection
with another testing technique such as
hydrostatic testing, radiographic test-
ing, ultrasonic testing,  acoustic  emis-
sions  testing, or another system of
non-destructive  shell   testing.  You
must  keep comparison records and you
must  also  inspect the container's sup-
ports and foundations. In addition, you
must  frequently  inspect the outside of
the container for signs of deteriora-
tion, discharges,  or accumulation of oil
inside diked  areas.  Records of inspec-
tions  and  tests  kept under usual and
customary business practices will suf-
fice for purposes of this paragraph.
  (7) Control leakage through defective
internal  heating  coils   by  monitoring
the steam  return and exhaust lines for
contamination from internal heating
coils that  discharge  into an  open wa-
tercourse,  or pass the steam  return or
exhaust lines through a settling  tank,
skimmer, or other separation or reten-
t ion system.
  (8) Engineer or update each  container
installation  in accordance with good
engineering  practice  to  avoid  dis-
charges. You must provide at least one
of the following devices:
  (i) High  liquid level  alarms with an
audible or visual signal at a constantly
attended operation or surveillance sta-
tion. In smaller facilities an audible air
vent may suffice.
  (ii) High  liquid level pump cutoff  de-
vices  set to stop flow  at a  predeter-
mined container content level.
  (iii)  Direct audible  or code  signal
communication between  the container
ganger and the pumping station.
  (iv) A fast response system for deter-
mining  the liquid level  of each bulk
storage container such as digital com
puters,   telepulse,  or  direct  vision
gauges. If  you use this alternative,  a
person  must  be  present to  monitor
gauges  and the overall  filling of bulk
storage containers.
  (v) You  must  regularly  test  liquid
level sensing  devices to  ensure proper
operation.
  (9) Observe effluent treatment facili
ties frequently  enough  to detect pos-
sible system upsets that could cause  a
discharge as described in §112.l(b).
  (10)  Promptly  correct visible  dis-
charges which result  in a loss  of oil
from the container, including but not
limited  to  seams,  gaskets,  piping,
pumps,  valves,  rivets,  and bolts. You
must promptly remove any accumula-
tions of oil in diked areas.
  (II) Position or locate mobile or port-
able oil storage containers to prevent  a
discharge as described in §M2.1(b). You
must furnish a secondary means of con-
tainment, such as a dike or catchment
basin, sufficient  to contain the capac-
ity  of the  largest single compartment
or container with sufficient freeboard
to contain precipitation.
  (d) Facility transfer operations,  [lump-
ing, and facility process. (1) Provide bur-
ied  piping that is installed or  replaced
on or after August 16, 2002, with a pro-
tective  wrapping  and  coating.  You
must  also  cathodically  protect  such
buried piping installations or otherwise
satisfy  the corrosion protection stand-
ards for piping in part 280 of this chap-
ter  or a State program approved under
part 281 of this chapter. If a section of
buried  line is exposed  for any reason,
you must carefully inspect it for dete-
rioration. If you find corrosion damage,
                                      33

-------
§112.9
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-05 Edition)
you  must: undertake additional exam-
ination and corrective action as indi-
cated by the magnitude of the damage.
  (2) Cap or blank-flange the  terminal
connection  at (.he transfer point and
mark it as to  origin when piping is not
In service or  is in standby service for
an extended time.
  (3) Properly design  pipe  supports  to
minimize abrasion and corrosion arid
allow for expansion and contraction.
  (4) Regularly inspect, all abovegrourid
valves, piping, and appurtenances. Dur-
ing the inspection you must assess the
general condition of  Items,  such  as
flange joints,  expansion joints,  valve
glands and bodies, catch  pans, pipeline
supports,  locking of valves, and metal
surfaces. You  must also conduct integ-
rity and leak testing of buried piping
at the time of installation,  modifica-
tion, construction,  relocation,  or re-
placement.
  (5) Warn all vehicles entering the fa-
cility to be sure that no vehicle will
endanger abovegrourid piping or other
oil transfer operations.

§112.9  Spill Prevention, Control, and
    Counter-measure Plan requirements
    for onshore oil production facilities.
  If you are the owner or operator of an
onshore production facility, you must:
  (a) Meet, the general requirements for
the  Plan listed  under §112.7, and the
specific discharge prevention  and con-
tainment procedures listed  under this
section.
  (b) Oil production facility drainage.  (I)
At  tank batteries and separation and
treating areas where there  is a reason
able possibility  of a  discharge as de
scribed in §112.l(b), close and seal at all
times  drains   of dikes  or drains  of
equivalent  measures  required  under
§112.7(c)(l),    except   when   draining
uncontamlnated   rainwater.  Prior  to
drainage, you must  inspect the  diked
area and take action as  provided  in
§112.8{c)(3)(ii), (iii), and (iv). You must
remove accumulated  oil on  the rain-
water and return it to storage or dis-
pose of it in  accordance with legally
approved methods.
  (2) Inspect at regularly scheduled in-
tervals field drainage systems (such as
drainage ditches or road ditches), and
oil  traps, sumps, or  skimmers,  for  an
accumulation of oil that may have re-
sulted from any small discharge.  You
must promptly  remove any accumula-
tions of oil.
  (c)  Oil production facility balk storage
containers. (1) Not  use a container for
the storage of oil  unless its material
and construction are  compatible with
the material stored and  the conditions
of storage.
  (2) Provide all tank battery,  separa-
tion,  and treating facility installations
with  a secondary  means  of contain-
ment for  the  entire  capacity of  the
largest,  single container and sufficient
freeboard to contain precipitation. You
must  safely  confine  drainage  from
undiked areas in a catchment basin or
holding pond.
  (3)  Periodically and upon a  regular
schedule  visually  inspect  each  con-
tainer  of oil   for  deterioration   and
maintenance needs, including the foun-
dation and support of each container
that  is  on or above the surface of the
ground.
  (4)  Engineer or update  new and old
tank  battery installations  in  accord-
ance  with good  engineering practice to
prevent discharges. You must  provide
at least one of the following:
  (i) Container capacity adequate to as-
sure that a container will not overfill if
a pumper/gauger is delayed in making
regularly scheduled rounds.
  (ii)  Overflow equalizing lines between
containers so that  a full container can
overflow to an adjacent container.
  (iii) Vacuum  protection adequate to
prevent  container collapse  during  a
pipeline run or other transfer of oil
from  the container.
  (iv) High level  sensors to generate
and  transmit an alarm  signal to  the
computer where the facility is subject
to a computer production control sys-
tem.
  (d)  Facility transfer operations, oil pro-
duction  facility.  (1)  Periodically  and
upon a  regular schedule  inspect all
aboveground valves and  piping associ-
ated  with transfer operations  for the
general  condition  of  flange  joints,
valve glands and bodies, drip pans, pipe
supports,  pumping  well  polish   rod
stuffing  boxes, bleeder  and  gauge
valves, and other such items.
  (2)  Inspect saltwater (oil field brine)
disposal  facilities  often, particularly
                                      34

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §112.11
following a sudden change  in atmos-
pheric temperature, to detect possible
system upsets capable of causing a dis-
charge.
  (3) Have a program of flowline main-
tenance  to prevent discharges  from
each flowline.

§112.10  Spill  Prevention, Control, and
    Co unterineasure Plan requirements
    for   onshore   oil   drilling   and
    workover facilities.
  If you are the owner or operator of an
onshore oil drilling and workover  facil-
ity, you must:
  (a)  Meet  the general  requirements
listed under §112.7,  and also meet  the
specific discharge prevention and con-
tainment procedures listed  under this
section.
  (b) Position or locate mobile drilling
or workover equipment so  as to pre-
vent  a  discharge   as   described  in
  (c) Provide  catchment  basins or di
version  structures  to  intercept  and
contain discharges of fuel, crude oil, or
oily drilling fluids.
  (d)   Install   a  blowout  prevention
(BOP)  assembly and well control  sys-
tem before drilling below any  casing
string  or during workover operations.
The BOP  assembly and well  control
system must be capable of controlling
any well-head pressure that may be en
countered  while  that BOP  assembly
and well control system are  on  the
well.

§ 112.11  Spill Prevention, Control, and
    Countermeasure Plan requirements
    for offshore oil drilling, production,
    or workover facilities.
  If you are the owner or operator of an
offshore oil  drilling,  production, or
workover facility, you mvist:
  (a)  Meet the general  requirements
listed  under §112.7,  and also  meet  the
specific discharge prevention and  con-
tainment procedures listed under  this
section.
  (b) Use oil drainage  collection equip-
ment to prevent and control small oil
discharges  around   pumps,   glands,
valves, flanges, expansion joints, hoses.
drain lines, separators, treaters, tanks,
and associated  equipment.  You must
control and  direct  facility  drains to-
ward a central collection sump to pre
vent the facility from  having  a  dis
charge as described in §112.l(b). Where
drains and sumps are not practicable.
you must remove oil contained in col-
lection  equipment  as  often  as  nec-
essary to prevent overflow.
  (c) For  facilities employing a sump
system, provide adequately sized sump
and drains and make available a spare
pump to remove liquid from the sump
and  assure  that oil does not escape.
You must employ a regularly scheduled
preventive maintenance inspection and
testing  program to  assure reliable op-
eration  of the  liquid removal system
and pump start-up  device. Redundant
automatic sump pumps and control de-
vices may be required on some  installa-
tions.
  (d) At facilities with areas where sep-
arators  and treaters are equipped with
dump valves which predominantly fail
in the closed position and where pollu-
tion risk is high, specially equip the fa-
cility to prevent the discharge of oil.
You  must prevent the discharge of oil
by:
  (I)  Extending the flare line to a diked
area if the separator is near shore;
  (2)  Equipping the  separator with a
high liquid level sensor that will auto-
matically shut  in wells  producing to
the separator; or
  (3)   Installing  parallel   redundant
dump valves.
  (e)   Kquip  atmospheric  storage  or
surge containers with high liquid level
sensing  devices  that activate an alarm
or control the flow,  or otherwise  pre-
vent discharges.
  (f)  Equip   pressure containers  with
high and  low pressure sensing devices
that activate an alarm or control the
flow.
  (g)  Equip  containers  with  suitable
corrosion protection.
  (h) Prepare and maintain at the facil-
ity a written procedure within  the Plan
for inspecting  and  testing pollution
prevention equipment and systems.
  (i)  Conduct testing and inspection of
the  pollution   prevention equipment
and systems  at  the facility on  a sched-
uled  periodic basis, commensurate with
the  complexity, conditions,   and  cir-
cumstances  of  the  facility  and  any
other  appropriate  regulations.   You
                                      35

-------
§112.12

must use simulated discharges for test-
ing arid inspecting human and equip-
ment pollution control and counter-
measure systems.
  (]) Describe in detailed  records sur-
face and subsurface well shut in valves
and  devices in use at. the  facility for
each  well sufficiently  to  determine
their method  of activation or control,
such as pressure differential, change in
fluid or How  conditions, combination
of pressure and flow, manual or remote
control mechanisms.
  (k) Install a BOP assembly and well
control system during workover oper-
ations  and before  drilling below any
casing string. The BOP assembly and
well control system must be capable of
controlling any well head pressure that
may be encountered while the BOP as-
sembly and well control system are on
the well.
  (1) Equip all manifolds (headers) with
check valves on individual flowlines.
  (m) Equip  the  flowline with  a high
pressure   sensing  device and shut-in
valve at  the  wellhead  if the shut-in
well pressure  is greater than the work-
ing pressure of the flowline and  mani-
fold valves  up to and  including the
header valves. Alternatively you may
provide a pressure  relief  system for
flowlines.
  (n) Protect all piping appurtenant to
the  facility  from  corrosion, such  as
with protective coatings  or cathodic
protection.
  (o)  Adequately  protect  sub-marine
piping  appurtenant  to  the  facility
against  environmental   stresses and
other activities such  as fishing oper-
ations.
  (p) Maintain sub-marine  piping ap-
purtenant to the facility in good oper
ating condition at all times. You must
periodically and according  to a  sched
ule inspect, or test such  piping for fail
ures. You must, document  and  keep a
record of such inspections or tests at.
the facility.
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-05 Edition)

Subpait C—Requirements for Ani-
    mal    Fats    and   Oils  and
    Greases,  and Fish and Marine
    Mammal Oils; and for Vege-
    table Oils, including Oils from
    Seeds,  Nuts,  Fruits,  and Ker-
    nels.
  SOURCE; 67  FR 57149, July 17.  2002. unless
otherwise noted.

8 112.12 Spill Prevention, Control, and
    Countermeasure Plan requirements
    for  onshore  facilities   (excluding
    production facilities)
  If you are the owner or operator of an
onshore facility  (excluding  a produc-
tion facility), you must:
  (a) Meet the general requirements for
the Plan  listed under §112.7, and the
specific discharge prevention and con-
tainment procedures listed in this sec-
tion.
  (b)  Facility  drainage.  (1)  Restrain
drainage from diked storage areas  by
valves to  prevent a discharge into the
drainage  system  or facility effluent
treatment  system, except where facil-
ity systems arc  designed  to control
such discharge. You may empty diked
areas by pumps  or ejectors; however,
you must  manually activate  these
pumps or t-jectors and must inspect the
condition of the accumulation before
starting, to  ensure  no oil will  be dis-
charged.
  (2) Use  valves  of manual, open-and-
closed design, for the drainage of diked
areas.  You  may not use flapper-type
drain valves to  drain diked areas.  If
your  facility drainage  drains directly
into a watercourse arid not  into an on-
site wastewater  treatment  plant, you
must   inspect   and    may    drain
uncontaminated  retained stormwater,
subject to  the requirements of  para-
graphs  (c)(3)(ii),  (iii). and (iv) of this
section.
  (3) Design facility drainage systems
from uiidiked areas with a potential  for
a discharge (such as where piping is lo-
cated  outside containment  walls  or
where tank truck discharges may occur
outside the loading area) to flow into
ponds, lagoons, or catchment basins de-
signed to  retain oil or return it to the
facilitv.   You    must   not   locate
                                     36

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §112.12
catchment basins in areas subject to
periodic flooding.
  (4) If facility drainage  is not  engi-
neered as  in  paragraph  (b)(3)  of this
section, equip the final discharge  of all
ditches Inside the facility with a diver-
sion system that would, in the event of
an uncontrolled discharge, retain  oil in
the facility.
  (5) Where drainage waters are treated
in more  than one treatment unit and
such  treatment  is  continuous,  and
pump transfer is needed,  provide two
"lift" pumps  and permanently install
at least  one of  the  pumps. Whatever
techniques you use, you must engineer
facility drainage systems  to prevent a
discharge as described in §112.I(b) in
case there is  an equipment failure or
human error at the facility.
  (c) Bulk storage containers. (I) Not use
a container for the storage of oil unless
its material and construction are com
patible  with the  material stored and
conditions of  storage such as  pressure
and temperature.
  (2) Construct all  bulk storage  con-
tainer installations so that you provide
a secondary means of containment, for
the entire capacity of the largest single
container  and sufficient freeboard to
contain precipitation. You must ensure
that diked areas are sufficiently Imper-
vious to contain discharged oil. Dikes,
containment curbs,  and pits  are  com-
monly employed for  this purpose. You
may  also  use an alternative  system
consisting of a drainage  trench enclo
sure that must be arranged so that any
discharge will terminate  and be safely
confined in a  facility catchment  basin
or holding pond.
  (3)    Not    allow    drainage   of
uncontaminated   rainwater  from the
diked area into a storm drain or dis-
charge of an effluent into an open wa-
tercourse, lake, or pond, bypassing the
facility treatment system unless you:
  (i) Normally keep  the bypass  valve
sealed closed.
  (ii) Inspect the retained rainwater to
ensure that its presence will not  cause
a discharge as described in § 112.1 (b).
  (ill) Open the bypass valve find reseal
it following drainage under responsible
supervision; and
  (iv) Keep adequate records  of such
events,  for example, any records re-
quired under permits issued in accord
ance with §§ 122.41 (j)(2)  and I22.41(m)(3)
of this chapter.
  (4)  Protect any completely buried
metallic storage tank  installed on or
after  January  10, 1974  from corrosion
by  coatings  or  cathodic protection
compatible  with local  soil conditions.
You must  regularly  leak  test  such
completely  buried  metallic  storage
tanks.
  (5)  Not   use  partially  buried  or
bunkered metallic tanks for the stor-
age of oil, unless you protect  the bur-
ied  section of the tank  from corrosion.
You must protect partially buried and
bunkered  tanks  from  corrosion  by
coatings or cathodic protection  com-
patible with local soil conditions.
  (6) Test each  aboveground container
for  integrity on a regular schedule, and
whenever you  make  material repairs.
The frequency of and  type  of testing
must  take into account container size
and design (such as floating roof, skid-
mourited, elevated, or partially buried).
You must  combine visual  inspection
with another testing technique such as
hydrostatic testing, radiographic test-
ing, ultrasonic testing,  acoustic emis-
sions   testing,  or another system of
non-destructive  shell   testing.  You
must  keep comparison records and you
must  also  inspect the container's sup-
ports  and foundations. In addition, you
must  frequently  inspect the outside of
the container  for  signs of deteriora-
tion, discharges, or accumulation of oil
inside diked areas. Records of inspec-
tions  and tests kept under usual and
customary business  practices  will suf-
fice for purposes of this  paragraph.
  (7) Control leakage through defective
internal heating  coils   by monitoring
the steam return and exhaust  lines for
contamination from  internal  heating
coils  that  discharge into  an open wa-
tercourse, or pass the steam return or
exhaust  lines through a settling tank,
skimmer, or other separation or reten
tion system.
  (8) Engineer or update each container
installation  in  accordance with good
engineering  practice  to  avoid  dis
charges. You must provide at least one
of the following devices:
  (i) High  liquid level  alarms with an
uudible or visual signal at a constantly
                                      37

-------
§112.13

attended operation or surveillance sta-
tion. In smaller facilities an audible air
vent may suffice,
  (ii) High liquid level pump cutoff de-
vices  set to stop flow  at  a  predeter-
mined container content level.
  (ill)  Direct audible  or code  signal
communication between the container
gauger and the pumping station.
  (iv) A fast response system for deter-
mining  the  liquid level of each bulk
storage container such as digital com-
puters,   telepulse.  or  direct  vision
gauges. If  you  use this alternative,  a
person  must be  present  to  monitor
gauges  and the overall  filling of bulk
storage containers.
  (v)  You  must regularly test liquid
level sensing devices  to ensure  proper
operation.
  (9) Observe effluent  treatment: facili-
ties frequently enough  to  detect  pos-
sible system upsets that could cause a
discharge as described in § 112.1 (b).
  (10)  Promptly  correct visible  dis-
charges which  result in a loss of oil
from the container, including but not
limited  to  seams,   gaskets,  piping,
pumps,  valves,  rivets, and bolts.  You
must promptly remove  any accumula-
tions of oil in diked areas.
  (11) Position or locate mobile or port-
able oil storage containers to prevent a
discharge as described in § 112.1 (b). You
must furnish a secondary means of con-
tainment, such as a dike or catchment
basin, sufficient to contain the capac-
ity of the  largest single compartment
or container with sufficient  freeboard
to contain precipitation.
  (d) Facility transfer  operations, pump-
ing, and facility process. (1) Provide bur-
ied piping  that is installed or replaced
on or after August 16, 2002, with a pro
tective  wrapping  and   coating.  You
must also  cathodically protect such
buried piping installations or otherwise
satisfy  the corrosion protection stand-
ards for piping in part 280 of this chap-
ter or a State program  approved under
part 281 of this chapter. If a section of
buried line is exposed for  any reason,
you must carefully inspect it  for dete-
rioration. If you find corrosion damage,
you must  undertake  additional exam-
ination and corrective  action as indi-
cated by the magnitude of the damage.
  (2) Cap or blank-flange the  terminal
connection at  the transfer point and
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-05 Edition)

mark it as to origin when piping is not
in service or is in standby service for
an extended time.
  (3) Properly  design  pipe supports  to
minimize abrasion and corrosion and
allow for expansion and contraction.
  (4) Regularly inspect all aboveground
valves, piping,  and appurtenances. Dur-
ing the inspection you must assess the
general condition  of  items,  such  as
flange joints,  expansion joints, valve
glands and bodies, catch pans, pipeline
supports,  locking  of valves,  and metal
surfaces. You must also conduct integ-
rity and leak  testing of buried  piping
at the time of installation,  modifica-
tion,  construction,  relocation,  or re-
placement.
  (5) Warn all vehicles entering the fa-
cility to be  sure  that no vehicle will
endanger  aboveground piping or other
oil transfer operations.

§ 112.13  Spill Prevention, Control, and
    Counter-measure Plan requirements
    for onshore oil production facilities.
  If you are the owner or operator of an
onshore production facility, you must:
  (a) Meet the general requirements for
the Plan  listed under §112.7, and the
specific discharge prevention and  con
tainment procedures listed under this
section.
  (b) Oil production facility drainage.  (1)
At  tank batteries and  separation and
treating areas  where there is a reason-
able possibility of a  discharge  as de-
scribed in &112.1(b), close and  seal at all
times  drains  of  dikes  or   drains  of
equivalent  measures  required  under
§112.7(c)(l),   except   when   draining
uncontaminated   rainwater.  Prior  to
drainage, you  must  inspect  the diked
area and Hake action as provided  in
§112.12{<:)(3)(ii), (ill), and (iv).  You must
remove accumulated  oil  on  the rain-
water and return  it  to storage or dis-
pose of it In accordance with legally
approved methods.
  (2) Inspect at regularly scheduled in-
tervals field drainage systems (such as
drainage ditches or road  ditches), and
oil  traps, sumps,  or  skimmers,  for  an
accumulation of oil that may have re-
sulted from  any small  discharge.  You
must promptly remove any accumula-
tions of oil.
  (c) Oil production facility bulk storage
containers. (I) Not use a container for
                                      38

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §112.15
the storage of oil  unless  its material
and construction are  compatible with
the material stored and the conditions
of storage.
  (2) Provide all tank battery,  separa-
tion, and treating facility  installations
with  a secondary  means  of contain-
ment   for the  entire  capacity of the
largest single container and sufficient
freeboard to contain precipitation. You
must   safely  confine  drainage  from
undiked areas in a catchment basin or
holding pond.
  (3) Periodically and  upon a  regular
schedule  visually  inspect  each  con
tainer  of  oil  for  deterioration  and
maintenance needs, including the foun-
dation  and  support of each container
that is on or above the surface of the
ground.
  (4) Engineer or  update  new and old
tank  battery installations  in  accord-
ance with good engineering practice to
prevent, discharges. You must  provide
at least one of the following:
  (i) Container capacity adequate to as-
sure that a container will not overfill if
a pumper/gauger is delayed in making
regularly scheduled rounds.
  (ii) Overflow equalizing lines between
containers so that  a full container can
overflow to  ail adjacent container.
  (iii)  Vacuum protection adequate to
prevent container  collapse during   a
pipeline run or other transfer of oil
from the container.
  (iv)   High  level  sensors  to generate
and transmit an alarm signal to the
computer where the facility is subject
to a computer production control sys-
tern.
  (d) Facility transfer operations, nil pro-
duction facility.  (1)  Periodically  and
upon   a regular schedule  inspect all
aboveground valves and piping associ-
ated with transfer operations  for the
general  condition  of  flange   joints,
valve glands and bodies, drip pans, pipe
supports,  pumping  well   polish  rod
stuffing  boxes,  bleeder   and  gauge
valves, and other such items.
  (2) Inspect saltwater (oil field brine)
disposal facilities  often,  particularly
following a sudden change in atmos-
pheric temperature, to detect possible
system upsets capable of causing a dis
charge.
  (3) Have a program of flowllne main-
tenance  to  prevent discharges  from
each flowline.

§112.14  Spill Prevention, Control, and
    Countenneasure Plan requirements
    for   onshore   oil   drilling   and
    workover facilities.
  If you are the owner or operator of an
onshore oil drilling and workover facil-
ity, you must:
  (a)  Meet  the general  requirements
listed under §112.7,  and also meet  the
specific discharge prevention and con-
tainment procedures listed  under this
section.
  (b) Position or locate mobile drilling
or workover equipment so  as to pre-
vent  a  discharge   as   described   in
§112.l(b),
  (c) Provide catchment  basins  or di-
version  structures  to  intercept and
contain discharges of fuel, crude oil, or
oily drilling fluids.
  (d)  Install  a  blowout   prevention
(BOP)  assembly and well control sys-
tem before  drilling below  any  casing
string  or during workover operations.
The BOP assembly  and  well control
system must be capable of controlling
any well-head pressure that may be en-
countered  while  that  BOP  assembly
and  well control  system are on  the
well.

§112.15  Spill Prevention, Control, and
    Counter-measure Plan requirements
    for offshore oil drilling, production,
    or workover facilities.
  If you are the owner or operator of an
offshore  oil  drilling,  production,   or
workover facility,  you must:
  (a)  Meet  the general  requirements
listed under §112.7,  and also meet  the
specific discharge prevention and con-
tainment procedures listed  under this
section.
  (b) Use oil drainage collection equip-
ment to  prevent and control small oil
discharges   around  pumps,   glands,
valves, flanges, expansion joints, hoses,
drain lines,  separators, treaters,  tanks,
and  associated  equipment.  You must
control and  direct  facility  drains  to-
ward a central collection sump to pre-
vent the facility from  having  a dis-
charge as described  in §112.l(b).  Where
drains and sumps are not practicable,
                                      39

-------
§112.20
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-05 Edition)
you must remove oil contained in col-
lection  equipment  as often  as nec-
essary to prevent overflow.
  (c) For  facilities employing a sump
system, provide adequately sized sump
and drains and make available a spare
pump to remove liquid from the sump
and  assure that oil  does not escape.
You must employ a regularly scheduled
preventive maintenance inspection and
testing  program to assure reliable op-
eration  of the  liquid  removal system
and pump start-up device. Redundant
automatic sump pumps and control de-
vices may be required on some  installa-
tions.
  (d) At facilities with areas where sep-
arators  and treaters are equipped with
dump valves which predominantly fail
in the closed position  and where pollu-
tion risk is high, specially equip the fa-
cility to prevent  the  discharge of oil.
You  must  prevent the discharge of oil
by:
  (1)  Extending the flare line to a diked
area if the separator is near shore;
  (2)  Equipping the separator with a
high liquid level sensor that will auto-
matically  shut  in wells  producing to
the separator; or
  (3)   Installing  parallel   redundant
dump valves.
  (e)  Equip  atmospheric  storage  or
surge containers with high liquid level
sensing  devices  that activate an  alarm
or control the flow, or otherwise  pre-
vent discharges.
  (f)  Equip  pressure  containers with
high and  low pressure sensing devices
that activate an alarm or control the
flow.
  (g)  Equip  containers with  suitable
corrosion protection.
  (h) Prepare and maintain at the facil-
ity a written procedure within  the Plan
for inspecting  and testing pollution
prevention equipment  and systems.
  (i)  Conduct testing arid inspection of
the  pollution   prevent ion equipment
and systems  at the facility on  a sched
uled periodic basis, commensurate with
the  complexity, conditions,   and  cir-
cumstances  of  the facility  and  any
other  appropriate  regulations.   You
must use simulated discharges  for test-
ing and  inspecting human and  equip-
ment pollution  control  and  counter-
measure systems.
  (j) Describe in detailed  records  sur-
face and subsurface well shut-in valves
and  devices in use at the facility for
each  well sufficiently  to  determine
their method  of activation or control,
such as pressure differential, change in
fluid  or flow  conditions, combination
of pressure and flow, manual or remote
control mechanisms.
  (k)  Install a BOP assembly and  well
control system during workover oper-
ations and  before  drilling below  any
casing string. The BOP assembly  and
well control system must be capable of
controlling any well-head pressure  that
may be encountered while that BOP as-
sembly and well control system are on
the well,
  (1) Equip all manifolds (headers) with
check valves on individual flowlines.
  (m) Equip the  flowline with a high
pressure  sensing  device and shut-in
valve at  the  wellhead  if the shut-in
well pressure  is greater than the work-
ing pressure of the flowline  and mani-
fold valves  up  to and  including  the
header valves. Alternatively you  may
provide  a pressure relief system for
flowlines.
  (n)  Protect all piping appurtenant to
the  facility  from  corrosion,  such as
with  protective coatings  or cathodic
protection.
  (o)  Adequately  protect  sub-marine
piping  appurtenant  to the  facility
against  environmental   stresses  and
other activities such  as fishing oper-
ations.
  (p)  Maintain submarine piping ap-
purtenant to the facility in good oper-
ating condition at all times. You must
periodically and according to  a  sched
ule inspect or test such  piping for  fail-
ures. You must document and keep a
record of such inspections or tests at
the facility.

       Subpart D—Response
           Requirements

§ 112.20  Facility response plans.
  (a) The owner or operator of any  non-
transportation-related onshore facility
that, because  of its location, could  rea-
sonably be expected to  cause  substan-
tial  harm to  the  environment by  dis-
charging  oil into  or  on the navigable
waters  or adjoining  shorelines shall
prepare and submit a facility response
                                      40

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §112.20
plan  to  the Regional Administrator,
according to the following provisions:
  (1) For the owner or operator of a fa-
cility in operation  on or before Feb-
ruary 18,  1993 who is required to pre-
pare and submit a response plan under
33 U.S.C.  1321(j)(5),  the Oil Pollution
Act of 1990  (Pub.  L. 101-380, 33 U.S.C.
2701 ct sag.)  requires  the submission of
a response  plan that satisfies the  re-
quirements  of 33 U.S.C.  1321(j)(5)  no
later than February 18, 1993.
  (i) The owner or operator of  an exist-
ing facility  that was  in operation on or
before February 18, 1993 who submitted
a response  plan  by  February 18,  1993
shall revise  the response plan to satisfy
the requirements of this section and re-
submit  the  response  plan or  updated
portions of the response plan to the Re-
gional Administrator by February  18,
1995.
  (ii) The owner or operator of  an exist
ing facility in operation on or before
February  18, 1993 who failed to submit
a response  plan  by  February 18.  1993
shall  prepare and  submit  a  response
plan that satisfies the requirements of
this section to the  Regional Adminis-
trator before August 30, 1994.
  (i) The owner or operator of a facility
in operation on or after August 30, 1991
that satisfies the criteria in paragraph
(f)(l) of  this section or that  is notified
by the Regional  Administrator pursu
aril to  paragraph  (b)  of this section
shall  prepare and submit a facility  re-
sponse plan that satisfies the  require-
ments of  this section to the Regional
Administrator.
  (i) For a facility that commenced  op
erations  after February 18,   1993  but
prior  to August 30, 1994, and is  required
to prepare and submit a response plan
based on the criteria in paragraph (f) (1)
of this section, the owner or  operator
shall  submit the response plan or up-
dated portions of  the response  plan,
along with  a completed version of the
response plan cover sheet contained in
Appendix  F to  this part, to  the Re-
gional Administrator prior  to August
30, 1994.
  (ii)  For  a  newly constructed facility
that  commences operation  after  Au
gust 30. 1994, and is required  to prepare
and submit  a response plan based  on
the criteria in paragraph (0(1) of this
section, the owner  or operator  shall
submit the response plan, along with a
completed version of the response plan
cover sheet contained in Appendix F to
this part,  to the  Regional  Adminis-
trator prior to the start of operations
(adjustments to  the response plan to
reflect changes that occur at  the facil-
ity during  the start-up phase of oper-
ations must  be submitted  to the Re-
gional Administrator after  an opcr
ational trial period of 60 days).
  (iii) For a facility required to prepare
and submit a response plan after Au-
gust 30, 1994, as  a  result of a planned
change  in  design,  construction, oper-
ation, or maintenance that renders the
facility  subject to the criteria in para-
graph (0(1) of this section, the owner
or operator shall submit the  response
plan, along with a completed version of
the  response plan  cover  sheet  con-
tained in Appendix H to this part, to
the Regional Administrator before the
portion   of  the  facility   undergoing
change commences operations (adjust-
ments to the response plan to reflect
changes that occur at the  facility dur-
ing the  start-up phase  of operations
must  be submitted  to the Regional Ad-
ministrator after an operational  trial
period of 60 days).
  (lv) For a facility required to prepare
and submit a response plan after Au-
gust  30,  1994. as a  result of an un-
planned  event or  change  in facility
characteristics that  renders the facil-
ity subject to the criteria in paragraph
(0(1) of this section, the owner or oper-
ator shall  submit  the response plan,
along with a completed version of the
response plan cover sheet contained in
Appendix F  to  this  part,  to  the Re-
gional   Administrator   within   six
months   of  the  unplanned event  or
change.
  (3) In the event the owner or operator
of a facility that is required to prepare
and submit a response plan uses an al-
ternative formula  that  is  comparable
to one contained in Appendix C to this
part to evaluate  the criterion in para
graph (0(l)(ii)(B) or  (f)(l)(ll)(C) of this
section, the owner or operator shall at-
tach  documentation to the   response
plan cover sheet contained in  Appendix
F  to  this part that  demonstrates the
reliability and analytical soundness of
the alternative formula.
                                      41

-------
§112.20
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-05 Edition)
  (4) Preparation and submission of re-
sponse plans—Animal fat and  vegetable
oil facilities. The owner or  operator  of
any non-transportation-related facility
that handles, stores,  or transports ani-
mal  fats arid vegetable oils must pre-
pare and submit a  facility  response
plan as follows:
  (i)  Facilities with approved plans. The
owner  or operator of a facility with a
facility response plan that has been ap-
proved under paragraph (c) of this sec-
tion  by July 31, 2000 need  not. prepare
or submit a revised plan except as oth-
erwise required  by paragraphs (b), (c),
or (d) of this section.
  (ii) Facilities with plans that have been
submitted to the Regional Administrator.
Except  for  facilities  with  approved
plans as  provided in  paragraph (a)(4)(i)
of this section,  the owner  or  operator
of a facility that has  submitted a re-
sponse plan to  the Regional Adminis-
trator  prior to  July 31, 2000 must re-
view the plan to determine if it meets
or exceeds the applicable provisions of
this  part. An owner or operator  need
not prepare or submit a new plan if the
existing  plan mtiets or exceeds the ap-
plicable provisions of this  part. If the
plan does not meet, or exceed the appli-
cable provisions of this part, the owner
or operator must prepare and submit a
new plan by September 28, 2000.
  (iii)  Newly regulated facilities.  The
owner  or  operator  of a  newly  con-
structed facility that commences oper-
ation after  July 31,  2000 must prepare
and submit a plan to the Regional Ad-
ministrator in  accordance with para-
graph (a)(2)(li) of this section.  The plan
must meet or  exceed  the applicable
provisions  of this part. The owner  or
operator of an   existing facility  that
must prepare and submit a plan after
July 31, 2000 as a result of a planned or
unplanned change in  facility character-
istics that  causes the facility  to be-
come regulated under  paragraph  (f) (1)
of this section,  must prepare  and sub-
mit  a  plan to the Regional Adminis-
trator in accordance  with paragraph
(a)(2)(iii) or (iv)  of this section,  as ap
propriate. The plan  must meet  or ex
ceed the applicable  provisions of this
part.
  (iv) Facilities amending existing plans.
The owner or operator of a facility sub
mitting an amended plan in accordance
with paragraph (d) of this section after
July 31, 2000,  Including plans that had
been previously approved, must also re-
view the plan to determine if it meets
or exceeds the applicable provisions of
this part. If the plan does not meet or
exceed the applicable provisions of this
part, the owner or operator must revise
and  resubmit revised  portions of  an
amended plan to the Regional Adminis-
trator in accordance with paragraph  (d)
of this section,  as  appropriate.  The
plan must meet or exceed the applica-
ble provisions of this part.
  (b)(l) The  Regional  Administrator
may at any time require the owner or
operator of any non-transportation-re-
lated onshore facility  to prepare and
submit a facility response plan under
this section after considering the fac-
tors in paragraph (0(2) of this section.
If such a determination is  made, the
Regional  Administrator shall  notify
the facility owner or operator in writ-
ing and shall provide a basis for the de-
termination. If the  Regional Adminis-
trator notifies the owner or operator in
writing of the requirement  to prepare
and submit a response  plan under this
section, the owner or operator of the
facility shall submit the response plan
to the Regional  Administrator within
six months of receipt of such written
notification.
  (2) The  Regional Administrator shall
review plans submitted by such facili-
ties to determine whether the facility
could, because of its location, reason-
ably  be expected to cause significant
and  substantial harm to the environ-
ment by discharging oil into or on  the
navigable  waters or adjoining  shore-
lines.
  (c) The  Regional Administrator shall
determine whether a facility could, be-
cause of its location, reasonably be ex-
pected  to cause significant  and sub-
stantial  harm to the  environment  by
discharging oil into or on the navigable;
waters or adjoining shorelines,  based
on the factors in paragraph (f)(3) of this
section.  If such  a determination  is
made,  the  Regional   Administrator
shall  notify the  owner  or operator of
the facility in writing and:
  (1) Promptly review  the facility re-
sponse plan;
                                      42

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §112.20
  (2) Require amendments to any re-
sponse plan that does not meet the re-
quirements of this section:
  (3) Approve any response plan  that
meets the requirements of this section;
and
  (4) Review each  response plan peri-
odically thereafter on a schedule estab-
lished  by the Regional  Administrator
provided that the period between  plan
reviews does not exceed five years.
  (d)(l)  The owner or operator of a fa-
cility for which a  response plan is re-
quired under this part shall revise and
resubmit  revised portions of the re-
sponse plan within 60 days of each fa-
cility change that materially may af
feet the response to a worst case dis-
charge, including:
  (i) A change in the facility's configu-
ration that materially alters the infor-
mation included in the response plan;
  (ii) A change  in  the type of oil han-
dled, stored, or  transferred that mate-
rially alters the required response re-
sources;
  (iii) A material change in capabilities
of the  oil spill removal organization(s)
that provide equipment and personnel
to  respond  to  discharges of oil  de-
scribed in paragraph (h)(5) of this sec-
tion;
  (iv) A material change in the  facili-
ty's  spill   prevention  and  response
equipment or emergency response pro-
cedures; and
  (v) Any other changes that materi-
ally affect the  implementation of the
response plan.
  (2) Except  as  provided in paragraph
(d)(l) of this section, amendments to
personnel and telephone number  lists
included in  the response plan  and a
change in the oil spill removal organi-
zation(s) that does not result in a ma-
terial change in support capabilities do
not  require approval  by the Regional
Administrator.  Facility owners or op-
erators shall provide a  copy of such
changes to the Regional Administrator
as the revisions  occur.
  (3) The owner or operator of a facility
that submits changes to  a response
plan as provided in paragraph (d)(l) or
(d)(2) of this section shall provide  the
F,PA-issued facility identification num-
ber (where one has been assigned) with
the changes.
  (4) The Regional Administrator shall
review  for approval  changes to  a  re-
sponse  plan  submitted  pursuant  to
paragraph (d)(l) of this section for a fa-
cility  determined  pursuant  to  para-
graph (f)(3) of this section to have the
potential to Cause significant and sub-
stantial harm to the environment.
  (e) If the owner or operator of a facil-
ity determines  pursuant to paragraph
(a)(2) of this section that the facility
could not, because of its location, rea-
sonably be expected  to cause substan-
tial  harm to the environment  by dis-
charging oil  into  or on the navigable
waters  or adjoining shorelines, the
owner or  operator  shall complete and
maintain  at the  facility the  certifi-
cation form contained in Appendix C to
this part  and, in the event  an alter-
native formula  that is comparable to
one  contained  in  Appendix C to this
part is used to evaluate the criterion in
paragraph  (f)(l)(ii)(B) or (f)(l)(ii)(C) of
this section,  the owner  or operator
shall attach documentation to the cer-
tification fonn  that  demonstrates the
reliability  and analytical soundness of
the comparable formula and  shall no-
tify the  Regional  Administrator  in
writing that  an  alternative  formula
was used.
  (0(1)  A facility could, because of its
location,  reasonably  be expected  to
cause substantial harm to the environ-
ment by discharging  oil into or on the
navigable waters  or  adjoining  shore-
lines pursuant  to paragraph (a) (2) of
this section, if it meets any of the fol-
lowing  criteria applied  in  accordance
with  the  flowchart  contained  in At-
tachment C-I to  Appendix  C to this
part:
  (i) The  facility  transfers  oil over
water to or from vessels and has a total
oil  storage capacity  greater  than or
equal to 42,000 gallons; or
  (ii) The facility's total oil storage ca-
pacity is greater than or equal to 1 mil-
lion gallons, and one of the following is
true:
  (A) The facility does  not have sec-
ondary  containment  for each  above-
ground  storage  area  sufficiently large
to contain the capacity of the  largest
aboveground  oil storage tank within
each   storage   area  plus  sufficient
freeboard to allow for precipitation;
                                      43

-------
§112.20
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-05 Edition)
  (B)  The facilit.y is located at a dis-
tance (as calculated using the appro-
priate formula in Appendix C  to  this
part  or  a comparable formula)  such
that a discharge from the facility could
cause injury to  fish and  wildlife and
sensitive environments. For further de-
scription of fish  and wildlife and  sen-
sitive environments, sec Appendices I,
II, and III of the "Guidance for Facility
and  Vessel  Response  Plans:  Fish and
Wildlife and  Sensitive Environments"
(see Appendix E to this part,  section 13,
for availability)  and  the  applicable
Area Contingency Plan prepared pursu-
ant  to  section 311 (j) (4) of  the Clean
Water Act;
  (C)  The facility is located at a dis-
tance (as calculated using the appro-
priate formula in Appendix C  to  this
part  or  a comparable formula)  such
that  a discharge   from   the   facility
would shut  down   a  public drinking
water intake; or
  (D) The facility has  had a  reportable
oil discharge  in an  amount,  greater
than  or equal  to 10,000 gallons within
the last 5 years.
  (2)(i) To" determine whether a facility
could, because of its  location,  reason-
ably be expected to cause substantial
harm  to  the  environment  by  dis-
charging oil  into or on the navigable
waters or  adjoining shorelines pursu-
ant to paragraph (b) of this section, the
Regional Administrator shall consider
the following:
  (A) Type of transfer operation;
  (B)  Oil storage  capacity;
  (C) Lack of secondary containment;
  (D) Proximity to fish and wildlife and
sensitive environments and other areas
determined by the  Regional Adminis-
trator to possess  ecological value;
  (E) Proximity  to  drinking water in-
takes;
  (F) Spill history; and
  (G) Other site-specific characteristics
and environmental factors that the Re-
gional Administrator  determines  to be
relevant to protecting the  environment
from harm by discharges of  oil into or
on navigable waters or adjoining shore-
lines.
  (ii) Any person, including  a member
of the  public or  any representative
from a Federal, State, or  local agency
who believes that a facility subject to
this section could,  because of its loca-
tion, reasonably be expected to cause
substantial  harm to the environment
by discharging oil into or on the navi-
gable waters or  adjoining  shorelines
may petition  the Regional  Adminis-
trator to determine whether  the facil-
ity meets  the.  criteria  in  paragraph
(f)(2)(0  of this  section. Such petition
shall include a discussion of how the
factors in paragraph (f)(2)(i) of this sec-
tion apply  to the facility in question.
The RA shall  consider such petitions
and respond  in an appropriate amount
of time.
  (3) To determine whether a facility
could, because of its location, reason-
ably be  expected to cause significant
and substantial harm to the environ-
ment by discharging oil into or on the
navigable waters or adjoining shore-
lines, the Regional Administrator may
consider the factors in paragraph (f)(2)
of this section as well as the following:
  (i) Frequency of past discharges;
  (ii) Proximity to navigable waters;
  (iii) Age of oil storage tanks; arid
  (iv) Other facility-specific and  Re-
gion-specific  information,   including
local impacts on public health.
  (g)(l) All facility response plans shall
be consistent with the requirements of
the National Oil  and Hazardous  Sub-
stance Pollution Contingency Plan (40
CFR part 300) and applicable Area Con-
tingency Plans prepared pursuant to
section  311(j)(4) of the Clean Water Act.
The facility response plan should be co-
ordinated with the local emergency re-
sponse  plan  developed by  the local
emergency planning  committee under
section  303 of Title III of the Superfund
Amendments and Reauthorization Act
of 1986 (42 U.S.C. 11001 et seq.). Upon re
quest,  the  owner or operator should
provide a copy of thi; facility response
plan to  the  local emergency planning
committee  or  State  emergency re-
sponse commission.
  (2) The owner or operator shall re-
view relevant portions of the National
Oil and Hazardous  Substances Pollu-
tion Contingency Plan and applicable
Area Contingency Plan annually and. if
necessary,  revise  the facility response
plan to  ensure consistency with these
plans.
  (3) The owner or operator shall re-
view arid update  the facility response
                                      44

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §112.20
plan periodically to reflect changes at
the facility.
  (h) A response plan .shall  follow the
format of the model facility-specific re-
sponse plan included in Appendix F to
this part, unless you have prepared an
equivalent response plan acceptable to
the Regional Administrator to  meet
State or other Federal requirements. A
response plan that does not follow the
specified format in Appendix F to this
part shall have  an emergency response
action plan as specified in paragraphs
(h)(l)  of this section  and he  supple-
mented with a  cross-reference  section
to identify the location of the elements
listed  in  paragraphs   (h)(2)  through
(h)(10)  of this section. To meet the re-
quirements of  this  part,  a response
plan shall address  the following ele-
ments, as  further described  in Appen-
dix F to this part:
  (1)  Emergency response  action  plan.
The response  plan  shall  include  an
emergency response action plan in the
format specified in paragraphs  (h)(l)(i)
through  (viii) of  this  section  that  is
maintained in the front  of the response
plan, or as a separate document accom-
panying  the response plan, and that in-
cludes the following information:
  (1) The identity and  telephone  num-
ber of a qualified individual having full
authority,  including  contracting au-
thority, to implement removal actions;
  (ii) The identity of individuals or or-
ganizations  to  be  contacted  in the
event of a discharge so that immediate
communications between the qualified
individual identified in paragraph (h)(l)
of this section and the appropriate Fed-
eral officials and the persons providing
response personnel and  equipment can
be ensured;
  (lii)  A description  of  information to
pass to response personnel in the event
of a reportable discharge;
  (iv)  A description of the facility's re-
sponse equipment  and its location;
  (v)  A  description  of response  per-
sonnel capabilities, including the du-
ties of persons at  the facility during a
response  action  and  their  response
times and qualifications;
  (vi)  Plans for evacuation of the facil-
ity and a reference to community evac-
uation plans, as appropriate;
  (vii)   A  description  of  immediate
measures to  secure the source of the
discharge, and to provide adequate con-
tainment and  drainage of discharged
oil; and
  (viii) A diagram of the facility.
  (2) Facility information. The response
plan shall identify and discuss the loca-
tion and type of the facility,  the iden
tity and tenure  of the  present  owner
and  operator, and the identity of the
qualified individual  identified in para-
graph (h)(l) of this section.
  (3)  Information  about emergency  re-
sponse. The response plan shall include:
  (i) The identity of private personnel
and equipment necessary to remove to
the  maximum  extent  practicable   a
worst  case  discharge  and other  dis-
charges  of oil  described in paragraph
(h) (5) of this section, and to mitigate or
prevent a substantial threat of a worst
case discharge (To identify response re-
sources to meet the facility response
plan requirements of this section, own-
ers or  operators  shall follow  Appendix
E  to this  part or,  where  not appro-
priate, shall clearly demonstrate in the
response plan why use of Appendix E of
this part is not appropriate at the fa-
cility  and make comparable arrange-
ments for response resources);
  (ii) Evidence of contracts or other ap-
proved means  for ensuring the avail-
ability of such  personnel  and  equip-
ment;
  (iii)  The identity  and the telephone
number of individuals or organizations
to be contacted in the event of a dis-
charge so that immediate communica-
tions between  the qualified individual
identified in paragraph  (h)(l)  of this
section and the appropriate Federal of-
ficial  and the  persons providing re-
sponse personnel and equipment can be
ensured;
  (iv) A  description of information to
pass to response personnel in  the event
of a reportable discharge;
  (v)  A  description  of response per-
sonnel capabilities,  including the du-
ties of persons at the  facility during  a
response  action and  their  response
times arid qualifications;
  (vl) A description of the facility's re-
sponse equipment, the location of the
equipment, and equipment testing;
  (vii)  Plans for evacuation of the facil-
ity and a reference lo community evac-
uation plans, as appropriate;
                                      45

-------
§112.20

  (viii) A diagram of evacuation routes;
and
  (Ix) A description of the duties of the
qualified individual identified in  para-
graph  (h)(l)  of this  section,  that in-
clude:
  (A) Activate internal alarms and haz-
ard commimicat ion systems  to  notify
all facility personnel;
  (B) Notify  all response personnel,  as
needed;
  (C)   Identify  the  character,   exact
source, amount, and extent of the re-
lease, as well as the other items needed
for notification;
  (D) Notify  and provide necessary in-
formation  to the appropriate Federal,
State, and local authorities  with des-
ignated  response roles,   including the
National Response Center, State Emer-
gency Response Commission, and  Local
Emergency Planning Committee;
  (E) Assess  the interaction of the dis-
charged  substance with water  and/or
other substances stored  at  the facility
and  notify response  personnel at the
scene of that assessment;
  (F) Assess the possible  hazards  to
human health and the environment due
to the release.  This assessment  must
consider both  the direct, and indirect
effects of the release (i.e., the effects of
any  toxic, irritating, or asphyxiating
gases that may be generated, or the ef-
fects of any hazardous surface  water
runoffs from water or chemical agents
used to  control fire  and heat-induced
explosion);
  (G) Assess  and implement prompt re
moval actions  to contain  and remove
the substance released;
  (H) Coordinate rescue and  response
actions as  previously arranged with all
response personnel;
  (I) Use authority to immediately ac-
cess company funding to initiate clean-
up activities; and
  (J) Direct cleanup activities  until
properly relieved of this responsibility.
  (4)  Hazard evaluation.  The  response
plan shall  discuss the facility's known
or reasonably   identifiable history  of
discharges reportable  under 40  CFR
part 110  for the entire life  of the facil-
ity and shall identify areas within the
facility where  discharges could  occur
and  what  the  potential  effects  of the
discharges would be on the  affected en-
vironment. To assess the range of areas
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-05 Edition)

potentially  affected,  owners or opera-
tors shall, where appropriate, consider
the  distance  calculated  in  paragraph
(f)(l)(ii)  of  this section  to  determine
whether a facility could,  because of its
location,  reasonably  be  expected to
cause substantial harm to the environ-
ment by discharging oil into or on the
navigable waters  or adjoining shore-
lines.
  (5) Response planning levels.  The re-
sponse plan shall include discussion of
specific planning scenarios for:
  (i) A worst case  discharge,  as  cal-
culated  using the appropriate  work-
sheet in  Appendix D  to this  part. In
cases  where  the  Regional  Adminis-
trator determines that the worst  case
discharge volume calculated by the fa-
cility is not appropriate, the Regional
Administrator may specify  the worst
case discharge amount to be used for
response  planning at the facility. For
complexes,  the worst  case planning
quantity  shall  be the  larger  of the
amounts  calculated  for  each  compo-
nent of the facility;
  (ii) A discharge  of 2,100  gallons or
less, provided that  this amount is less
than the worst case discharge amount.
For complexes,  this planning quantity
shall be the larger of the amounts cal-
culated for  each component of the fa-
cility; and
  (iii)  A  discharge greater  than  2.100
gallons and less than or equal  to 36,000
gallons or 10 percent of the capacity of
the largest tank at the facility, which-
ever Is  less, provided that this amount
is less  than the worst case discharge
amount.  For  complexes,  this planning
quantity  shall  be the  larger  of the
amounts  calculated  for  each  compo-
nent of the facility.
  (6) Discharge detection systems. The re-
sponse  plan shall describe  the  proce-
dures and equipment used to detect dis-
charges.
  (7) Plan implementation. The response
plan shall describe:
  (i) Response actions to be carried out
by facility personnel or contracted per-
sonnel  under the response plan to en-
sure the  safety of the facility and to
mitigate  or  prevent  discharges  de-
scribed in paragraph (h)(5) of this sec-
tion or the substantial  threat of  such
discharges;
                                      46

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §112.21
  (ii) A description of the equipment to
be used for each scenario;
  (iii) Plans to dispose of contaminated
cleanup materials; and
  (iv)  Measures  to  provide  adequate
containment   and   drainage  of  dis-
charged oil.
  (8) Self-inspection, drills/exercises, and
response  training.  The  response plan
shall include:
  (i) A checklist and record of inspec-
tions  for  tanks,  secondary  contain
ment, and response equipment;
  (ii) A description of the drill/exercise
program to be carried out under the re-
sponse plan as described in §112.21;
  (iii) A description of the training pro-
gram to be carried out under the re
sponse plan as described in §112.21; anil
  (iv)  Logs  of  discharge  prevention
meetings, training sessions, and drills/
exercises.  These  logs  may be  main
tained as  an  annex to  the  response
plan.
  (9) Diagrams. The response plan shall
include site plan and drainage plan dla
grams.
  (10)  Security  systems. The  response
plan shall  include  a description of fa
cility security  systems.
  (11) Response plan cover sheet. The re
sponse plan shall include  a completed
response plan  cover  sheet  provided  in
Section 2.0 of Appendix F  to this part.
  (i)(l) In the event the owner or oper-
ator of a facility does riot agree with
the  Regional  Administrator's  deter-
mination that the  facility could,  be
cause of its location, reasonably be ex-
pected to  cause substantial harm  or
significant and substantial harm to the
environment by discharging oil into or
on  the navigable waters or adjoining
shorelines, or that, amendments  to the
facility  response plan  are necessary
prior to  approval,  such as changes  to
the worst case discharge planning vol
ume,  the owner  or operator may sub-
mit  a request for reconsideration  to
the Regional  Administrator and pro
vide additional information and data in
writing to  support  the request. The re-
quest  and  accompanying  information
must be submitted to the Regional Ad-
ministrator within 60 days of receipt of
notice of the Regional  Administrator's
original decision. The Regional Admin-
istrator shall  consider  the  request and
render a decision as rapidly as  prac-
ticable.
  (2) In the event the owner or operator
of a facility believes a change in the fa-
cility's classification status  is  war-
ranted because of an unplanned event
or change in the facility's characteris-
tics  (i.e.,  substantial harm or  signifi-
cant and substantial harm), the owner
or operator may submit a request  for
reconsideration  to  the  Regional Ad-
ministrator and provide additional  in-
formation and data in writing to sup-
port the request. The Regional Admin-
istrator shall consider the  request and
render a decision as rapidly as  prac-
ticable.
  (3)  After  a request  for  reconsider-
ation under paragraph (i)(l) or (i)(2) of
this section has been denied by the  Re-
gional Administrator, an owner or  op-
erator  may  appeal  a  determination
made by the Regional Administrator.
The appeal  shall be made  to the EPA
Administrator and  shall  be made  in
writing within fid days of receipt of  the
decision from the Regional Adminis-
trator that  the  request for reconsider-
ation was denied. A complete copy of
the appeal  must  be sent  to the  Re-
gional Administrator at the time  the
appeal is made. The appeal shall con-
tain a clear and concise statement of
the issues and  points  of  fact  in  the
case.  It also may contain additional in-
formation from  the  owner or operator,
or from any other person. The EPA Ad-
ministrator may request additional in-
formation from  the  owner or operator,
or from any other person. The EPA Ad-
ministrator shall  render a decision as
rapidly as practicable and  shall  notify
the owner or operator of the decision.

|5S FR 340S8.  July 1, 19»4, as amended nt 65
FR 40798. June 30, 2000; 66 FR 34560,  June 29,
2001: 67 FR 47151. July 17, 2002]

$112.21 Facility response training and
    drills/exercises.
  (a) The owner or operator of any fa-
cility required to prepare a facility re-
sponse plan under §112.20 shall develop
arid   implement  a  facility response
training program and  a drill/exercise
program that satisfy the requirements
of this section. The owner  or operator
shall  describe the programs in  the re
sponse plan as provided in § H2.20(h)(8).
                                      47

-------
Pt. 112, App. A

  (b) The  facility  owner or  operator
shall develop a facility response train-
ing  program to train those personnel
involved  in oil  spill response activities.
It is recommended  that  the training
program  be based on the USCG's Train-
ing Elements for Oil Spill Response,  as
applicable to facility operations. An al-
ternative program can also be accept-
able  subject to approval by the Re-
gional Administrator.
  (1) The owner or operator shall be re-
sponsible for the proper instruction of
facility personnel  in the  procedures  to
respond  to discharges  of oil and in ap-
plicable  oil spill response laws, rules,
and regulations.
  (2) Training shall be functional in na-
ture according to job tasks for both su-
pervisory  and   non supervisory   oper-
ational personnel.
  (3) Trainers shall develop specific les-
son  plans on subject  areas relevant  to
facility personnel  involved  in oil  spill
response  and cleanup.
  (c) The  facility  owner or  operator
shall develop a program of  facility re-
sponse drills/exercises, including  eval-
uation procedures. A program that fol-
lows the  National  Preparedness  for Re-
sponse  Exercise Program (PRKP) (see
Appendix E to  this part, section 13, for
availability) will  be deemed  satisfac-
tory for purposes of this section. An al-
ternative program can also be accept-
able  subject to approval by the Re-
gional Administrator.
[59 FR 34101, July 1, 1994. as  amended at 65
FR 4079H, June 30. 2000J

APPENDIX A TO PART 112—MEMORANDUM
    OF  UNDERSTANUIMG  BETWEEN THE
    SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION AND
    THE   ADMINISTRATOR OF  THE  ENVI-
    RONMENTAL. PROTECTION AGENCY

          SECTION II- DEFINITIONS
  The Environmental Protection Agency and
the Department of Transportation agree that
for the purposes of Executive Order 11548, the
term:
  (1) Non-transportation-related  onshore and
offshore facilities means:
  (A) Fixed onshore and offshore oil well
drilling facilities including  all  equipment
and  appurtenances related thereto  used In
drilling operations for  exploratory or  devel-
opment wells, but excluding any terminal fa-
cility, unit  or process  integrally  associated
with the  handling or transferring of  oil in
hulk to or from a vessel.
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-05 Edition)

  (B) Mobile  onshore  arid offshore oil well
drilling platforms, barges, trucks, or other
mohile facilities Including all equipment and
appurtenances related thereto when  such
mobile facilities are fixed in position  for the
purpose of drilling operations for exploratory
or development wells,  but excluding any ter-
minal facility, unit or process  Integrally as-
sociated with the handling or transferring of
oil in bulk to or from a vessel.
  (C) Fixed onshore and offshore oil produc-
tion structures, platforms, derricks, and rigs
including all equipment and  appurtenances
related  thereto, as well as completed wells
and the w< 11 head  separators, oil separators.
and storage facilities used in the production
of oil,  but excluding  any  terminal facility,
unit  or process  Integrally associated  with
the handling or transferring of oil in bulk to
or from a vessel.
  (D) Mobile onshore and offshore oil produc-
tion  facilit les including all  equipment and
appurtenances related thereto as well  as
completed wells  and wellhead  equipment.
piping  from  wellheads to oil separators, oil
separators, and storage facilities used in the
production of oil when such mohile facilities
are  fixed in position  for the  purpose of oil
production operations,  hut  excluding any
terminal facility, unit or process Integrally
associated with the handling or transferring
of oil in bulk  to or  from a vessel.
  (E)  Oil  refining facilities   Including all
equipment and appurtenances related there-
to as well as in-plant  processing units, stor-
age  units,  piping, drainage  systems and
waste treatment units used in the refining of
oil, hut excluding any terminal facility, unit
or process integrally associated with  the
handling or transferring of oil in bulk to or
from a vessel.
  (F)  Oil storage  facilities   including all
equipment and appurtenances related there-
to as well as fixed bulk  plant storage, ter-
minal oil  storage  facilities,  consumer  stor-
age,  pumps and drainage systems used in the
storage of oil, but  excluding inline or break-
out storage tanks needed for the continuous
operation of a pipeline system and any ter-
minal facility, unit or process integrally as-
sociated with the handling or  transferring of
oil In bulk to or from a vessel.
  (G) Industrial, commercial, agricultural or
public facilities which use and store oil, but
excluding any terminal facility, unit or proc-
ess  integrally associated with the handling
or transfer: ing of oil in  bulk to or  from a
vessel.
  (H)  Waste  treatment  facilities  including
in-plant pipelines, effluent discharge lines,
and  storage  tanks,  hut excluding  waste
treatment facilities located on vessels and
terminal storage  tanks and  appurtenances
fur  the reception  of  oily ballast  water  or
tank washings from vessels and  associated
systems used for off-loading vessels.
                                         48

-------
Environmental Protection Agency

  (I) Loading racks, transfer hoses, loading
arms and other equipment which are appur-
tenant to a nontransportation-related facil-
ity or  terminal facility and which are used
to transfer oil in hulk to or from highway ve-
hicles or railroad cars.
  (J)  Highway vehicles  and  railroad  cars
which are used for the transport of oil exclu-
sively  within  the  confines  of a nontrans-
portation-related facility and which are not
intended  to  transport oil  in  interstate or
intrastate commerce.
  (K) Pipeline systems which are used ("or the
transport of oil exclusively within the con-
fines of a riontransportatiori related facility
or terminal  facility and which  are not In-
tended to transport oil in interstate or intra-
state commerce, but excluding pipeline  sys-
tems used to transfer  oil in hulk to or from
a vessel.
  (2) Transportation-related  nnshorr  and off-
shore facilities means:
  (A) Onshore  and offshore terminal  facili-
ties including  transfer hoses,  loading arms
and other equipment and appurtenances used
for the purpose of handling or transferring
oil in bulk to or from a vessel as well as stor-
age tanks and appurtenances for the  reeep
tlon of oily ballast water or  tank washings
from vessels,  but  excluding terminal waste
treatment facilities and terminal oil storage
facilities.
  (B) Transfer hoses, loading arms and other
equipment appurtenant to  a  non-transpor
tation-related facility  which is used to trans-
fer oil in bulk to or from a vessel.
  (C) Interstate and intrastate onshore  and
offshore pipeline  systems including pumps
and appurtenances related thereto as well as
in-line or breakout storage  tanks needed for
the continuous operation of a pipeline  sys-
tem, and pipelines from onshore and offshore
oil production facilities, hut excluding on-
shore and offshore piping from wellheads to
oil separators  and pipelines which are used
for the transport of oil  exclusively within
the confines of a  nontransportation-related
facility or terminal facility and which are
not intended to transport oil in interstate or
intrastate commerce  or to transfer  oil in
bulk to or from a vessel.
  (D)  Highway vehicles  and  railroad  cars
which  are used for the transport of oil in
interstate or intrastate commerce  and the
equipment and appurtenances related there-
to, and equipment used for the fueling of lo-
comotive units, as well as the rights-of-way
on which they operate. Excluded are high
way vehicles  and  railroad  rars  and motive
power used exclusively within the confines of
a  nontransportation-related facility or  ter
mirial facility and which are not intended for
use in interstate or Intrnstate commerce.
                          Pt. 112, App. B

APPENDIX B TO PART 112—MEMORANDUM
    OF UNDERSTANDING AMONG THE SEC-
    RETARY  OF   THE  INTERIOR,   SEC-
    RETARY OF  TRANSPORTATION,  AND
    ADMINISTRATOR  OF THE   ENVIRON-
    MENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

                 PURPOSE
  This   Memorandum   of   Understanding
(MOU) establishes the jurlsdictional respon-
sibilities  for  offshore  facilities,  including
pipelines, pursuant  to  section 311 (j)(l)(c),
0)(5), and  (j)(6)(A)  of the Clean Water Act
(CWA), as amended hy the Oil Pollution Act
of 1990 (Public Law 101-380). The Secretary of
the Department of the Interior  (DOI), Sec-
retary of the Department of Transportation
(DOT), and Administrator of the Environ-
mental  Protection Agency (EPA) agree to
the  division of responsibilities set   forth
below for spill  prevention and control,  re-
sponse planning, and equipment inspection
activities pursuant to those provisions.

               BACKGROUND
  Executive Order (E.G.)  12777 (56  FR 54757)
delegates to DOI, DOT. and EPA various re-
sponslhilitles identified in section 311(j) of
the CWA. Sections 2(b)(3), 2(d)(3). and 2(e)(3)
of E.O. 12777 assigned to DOI  spill prevention
and  control,   contingency  planning,  and
equipment inspection  activities  associated
with offshore facilities.  Section 311 (a)(11)  de-
fines the term  "offshore facility" to include
facilities of any kind located in, on, or under
navigable waters of the  United  States.  By
using this definition,  the  traditional DOI
role  of regulating  facilities on  the  Outer
Continental Shelf Is expanded by E.O. 12777
to include inland lakes, rivers, streams, and
any other Inland waters.

             RESPONSIBILITIES
  Pursuant to section 2(i) of E.O. 12777, DOI
redelegatos, and EPA and DOT agree  to  as
sume, the functions vested  in DOI by sec-
tions Z(b)(3), 2(d)(3). arid 2(e)(3) of E.O. 12777
as set forth below. For purposes of this MOU.
the term  "coast line" shall be defined as in
the Submerged Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 13lll(c))
to mean  "the  line of ordinary  low  water
along that portion of the coast  which is in
direct contact with the  open sea and the line
marking  the seaward  limit  of  inland wa-
ters."
  1.  To  EPA, DOI  redelegates  responsibility
for  rion transportation-related  offshore  fa-
cilities located landward of the coast line.
  >.  To  DOT, DOI  redelegates responsibility
lor transportation-related facilities, includ-
ing pipelines, located landward of the  coast
line. The DOT  retains jurisdiction for  deep-
water  ports and  their associated seaward
pipelines, as delegated by E.O. 12777.
                                           49

-------
Pf.  112, App. C

  3. The DO! retains jurisdiction over facili-
ties, including pipelines, located seaward of
the coast  line, except for  deepwater ports
and associated seaward pipelines delegated
by E.O. 12777 to DOT.

              EFFECTIVE DATE
  This MOU is effect ive on the  date of the
final execution hy the indicated  signatories.

                LIMITATION'S
  1. The DO1, DOT, and KPA may agree In
writing to exceptions Co this MOU on a facil-
ity-specific hasis. Affected parties  wilt  re-
ceive notification of the exceptions.
  2. Nothing in this MOU is intended to  re-
place,  supersede,  or  modify  any  existing
agreements hetween or among DOI,  DOT, or
EPA.

       MODIFICATION AND TERMINATION
  Any party to this agreement may  propose
modifications by submitting them in writing
to the heads of the other agency/department.
No modification may he adopted  except with
the consent of all  parties.  All parties shall
indicate their consent to  or  disagreement
with  any  proposed modification within 60
days  of receipt.  Upon the request  of  any
party, representatives of  all  parties shall
meet  for the  purpose  of i-onsldering excep-
tions  or modifications to  this  agreement.
This MOU  may he terminated only with the
mutual consent of all parties.
  Dated: November 8. 1993.
Bruce Babbitt,
  Secretary of the Interior.
  Dated: December  14,  1993.
Federico Peiia,
  Secretary of Transportation.
  Dated: February 3, 1994.
Carol M. Browner,
  Administrator,  Environmental   Protection
Agency.
(59 FR 34102, July I, 19941

 APPENDIX C TO PART 112—SUBSTANTIAL
             HARM CRITERIA

             1.0  INTRODUCTION
  The  flowchart provided in Attachment C-I
to this appendix shows the decision tree with
the criteria to identify whether a  facility
"could reasonably be expected to cause sub-
stantial harm to the  environment  hy  dis-
charging into or on the navigable waters or
adjoining shorelines."  In addition,  the Re-
gional Administrator  has  the disi.-retlon to
identify facilities that must prepare and sub-
mit facility-specific response plans to EPA.

               A /   Definitions
  1.1.1  Great  Lakes means  Lakes Superior,
Michigan,  Huron,  Erie, and  Ontario, their
connecting  and tributary waters, the Saint
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-05 Edition)

Lawrence River as far as Saint Regis, and
adjacent port areas.
  1.1.2  Higher Volume Port Areas include
  (1) Boston. MA:
  (2) New York, NY;
  (3) Delaware Bay  arid Rivet  to  Philadel-
phia. PA;
  (4) St. Crolx. VI;
  (5) Pascagoula, MS;
  (6) Mississippi River from Southwest  Pass.
LA to Baton Rouge. LA:
  (7) Louisiana  Offshore Oil Port  (LOOP),
LA;
  («} Lake Charles, LA;
  (9) Sahine Neches River. TX;
  (10) Galveston Bay and Houston Ship Chan-
nel. TX:
  (11) Corpus Christ!. TX:
  (12) Los Angeles/Long Beach Harbor. CA;
  (13) San  Francisco Bay,  San Pablo  Bay,
Carquinez  Strait,  and Suisun  Bay to  Anti-
orh. CA:
  (14) Straits of Juan de Fuca from Port An
geles, WA  t:o and  including Puget  Sound,
WA:
  (15) Prince William Sound, AK: and
  (16) Others as specified by the Regional Ad
ministrator for any EPA Region.
  1.1.3  Inland Ares  means the area shore-
ward of the boundary lines defined In 46 CFR
part 7. except in the Gulf of Mexico. In the
Gulf of Mexico,  it means the area shoreward
of the lines of demarcation (COLREG lines as
defined  in  33 CFR 80.740-80.850). The inland
area does not include the Great Lakes.
  1.1.4  Rivers and Canals means  a body of
water confined  within  the Inland area, in-
cluding  the   Iritracoastal  Waterways  and
other  waterways artificially  created for
navigating that  have project depths of 12 feet
or less.

2.0  DESCRIPTION OF SCRKENING CRITERIA FOR
     THE SUBSTANTIAL HARM FLOWCHART

  A  facility that has the potential to  cause
substantial harm to the environment in the
event of a discharge must prepare and sub-
mit,  a facility-specific response plan to EPA
in accordance with Appendix F to this part.
A description of the screening criteria for
the substantial  harm  flowchart is provided
below:
  2.1  Non-Transportation Related   Facilities
With a Total Oil Storage Capacity Greater Than
or Kqual to 42.000 Gallons Where Ofierations In-
clude Over-Water  Transfers  of Oil. A  non-
transportation-related facility with a  total
oil storage capacity  greater than or equal to
42,000 gallons that transfers oil over water to
or from vessels must submit a response plan
to  EPA. Daily oil  transfer operations at
these types of facilities occur between barges
and  vessels and onshore bulk storage tanks
over open water. These facilities are  located
adjacent to navigable water.
                                           50

-------
Environmental Protection Agency

  2.2  Lack of Adequate  Secondary Contain-
ment at Facilities With a Total Oil Storage Ca-
pacity Greater Than or Equal to  I Million Gal
Ions. Any facility with a total oil storage ca-
pacity greater than or equal to  1 million gal-
lons without secondary  containment  suffi-
ciently  large to contain the capacity of the
largest  aboveground oil storage tank within
each area plus sufficient freeboard to  allow
for precipitation must submit a  response
plan to EPA. Secondary containment struc-
tures that meet the standard of good eng!
neerlng practice for the purposes of this part
include herms, dikes, retaining walls,  curb-
ing, culverts, gutters, or other  drainage sys-
tems.
  2.3  Proximity to  Fish and Wildlife and Sen-
sitive Environments at Facilities With a Total
Oil Storage Capacity Greater Than or Equal to
I Million  Gallons. A facility with a total oil
storage capacity greater than  or equal to 1
million  gallons  must  suhmit  its  response
plan if  It Is  located at a distance such that
a discharge from the facility could  cause In-
jury (as defined at 40 CFR 112.2) to fish and
wildlife and sensitive environments. For fur-
ther description offish and wildlife and sen-
sitive environments, see Appendices I. II, and
111  to DOC/NOAA's "Guidance  for Facility
arid Vessel Response Plans: Fish and Wildlife
and Sensitive Environments"  (see Appendix
E  to  this part, section 13, for availability)
and the applicable Area Contingency  Plan.
Facility owners or  operators must determine
the distance at which an oil discharge could
cause injury to fish  and  wildlife  and sen-
sitive environments using the appropriate
formula presented in  Attachment C-III  to
this appendix or a comparable formula.
  2.4  Proximity to  Public Drinking Water In-
takes at Facilities with a Total Oil Storage Ca-
pacity Greater than or Equal tu  1 Million Gal-
Ions A facility with a total  oil storage capac-
ity greater than or equal to 1 million gallons
must suhmit its response plan if it Is located
at a distance such  that a discharge from the
facility would  shut down a public  drinking
water Intake, which is analogous to a public
                          Pt. 112, App. C

water system as described at 40 CFR U3.2(c).
The distance at which an oil  discharge from
an SPCC-regulated facility would shut down
a public drinking water intake shall be cal-
culated using the  appropriate  formula pre-
sented in Attachment C-III to this appendix
or a comparable formula.
  2.5  Facilities That Have Experienced Report-
able Oil Discharges in an Amount Greater Than
or Equal to 10.000  Gallons Within the Past 5
Years and  That Have a Total  Oil Storage Ca-
pacity Greater Than or Equal to  I Million Gal-
lons. A  facility's oil spill history within the
past 5 years shall be considered in the eval-
uation  for  substantial  harm.  Any  facility
with  a  total oil storage capacity  greater
than or equal to  1 million gallons that  has
experienced a reportable oil discharge in an
amount greater than or equal to  10,000 gal-
lons within the past 5 years  must submit a
response plan to EPA.

 3.0 CERTIFICATION FOR FACILITIES THAT Do
        NOT POSE SUBSTANTIAL HARM
  If the facility does not meet the substan-
tial harm criteria  listed In Attachment  C-I
to this appendix, the owner or operator shall
complete and maintain at the  facility  the
certification form  contained  in Attachment
C-1I to  this appendix. In the  event an alter-
native formula that is comparable to the one
In this appendix Is used  to evaluate the sub-
stantial harm criteria, the owner or operator
shall  attach documentation  to the certifi-
cation  form  that  demonstrates  the  reli-
ability and analytical soundness of the com-
parable  formula and shall  notify the  Re-
gional Administrator In writing that an  al-
ternative formula was used.

              4.0  REFERENCES
  Chow, V.T. 1959. Open  Channel Hydraulics.
McGrawHill.
  USCG  IFR (58 FR  7353,  February  5, 1993).
This document is  available  through EPA's
rultmaking docket as noted In Appendix E to
this part, section 13.
                                           51

-------

ft. 112, App. C                                               40 CFR Ch.  I (7-1-05 Edition)

                               ATTACHMENTS TO APPENDIX C
                                                 Attachment C-I
                             Flowchart of Criteria for Substantial Harm
I*** th;: facility transfer Oi3 over
water 10 ur from vessels anJ Uocs
the tacilft> han; a total oil
»u>ragc capacity gnrtier thoii »»
equal to J 2.000 gallons'*

N<.
Yes


                                                               r:
                                                              "I Submit Response Plan
               IXics ihc faviEitv have- a tout- ui!
               J>turagc capacity jjivalerlHan or
               ctjoal lo I million italicm***
Within w>y 4buv of the larccsi
dhov^i-oimd nil storage tank pEus
!»ii01ciff]it froclxwd 10 alinw for
                                                    h iftc lacilhs' located at a distance1 such
                                                    thai i di$chAr^c from the f*cilij> could
                                                    cuust: iitjuiy lu Ti-il and wildlife iirtJ
                                                    h ihc facility lufit'ed ut u distance'
                                                    Ihjl a ili^^Mr^c tr.ml rh« (At'itrt> v.o
                                                    3.iiui down a put-li* drbikiny waicr in
                                                                   'No
                                                    H.t> llie facili;y c^f-crrwuitx) a rcfOn.ihic oil
                                                    iptll m an ;«nc.uttt [Jfcafer lliaii iir pqual fo
                                                    I O.UOU pilous within flic lt tiveycaf'j?
               No Sub initial of Response Plan
               Except at RA Discretion
                                                                                       Yes
  : Calculated using ihc appropriate formula in Auachment C'-ITI lu this appendix or a c*nnparahlc
  formula.
  3  For fttrther description offish and wildlife and sensitive environments sec Appendices fJJ. and
  HI U» DOC/NOAA's "Guidance fw Facility and vessel response Plans- fish and Wildhlc and
  Sensitive Environments" (5£ V R 14? 13. March 2V> \ 994) and Ihc applicable Area Contingency
  PUn.
  ?  Public drinking wuici' intakes aix% analogiius to public water systems as described at CFR
                                                 52

-------
Environmental Protection Agency

ATTACHMENT C-ll—CERTIFICATION OF THE AP-
  PLICABILITY OF THE SUBSTANTIAL HARM CRI-
  TERIA
Facility Name:	
Facility Address:	
  1. Does the facility transfer oil over water
to or from vessels and does the facility have
a total oil storage capacity greater than  or
equal to 42.000 gallons?
  Yes	No	
  2. Does the facility have a total oil storage
capacity greater than or equal to 1 million
gallons and does the facility lack secondary
containment  that is  sufficiently large  to
contain the  capacity  of the largest above
ground oil  storage  tank  plus   sufficient
freehoard to allow for precipitation within
any aboveground oil storage tank area?
  Yes	No	
  3. Does the facility have a total oil storage
capacity greater than or equal to 1 million
gallons and is the facility locatE;d at a dis-
tance  (as calculated using the appropriate
formula if) Attachment  C-III to this appen-
dix or a comparable formula') such that  a
discharge from the facility could  cause in-
jury to fish and wildlife and sensitive envi-
ronments? For further description offish and
wildlife and sensitive environments, see Ap-
pendices I, 11, and  III to DOC/NOAA's "Guid-
ance for Facility and Vessel Response Plans:
Fish  and  Wildlife and   Sensitive Environ-
ments" (see Appendix  E  to this part, section
13. for availability)  and  the applicable Area
Corn ingency Plan.
  Yes	No	
  4. Does the facility have a total oil storage
capacity greater than or equal to 1 million
gallons and is the facility located at a dis-
tant e  (as calculated using the appropriate
formula in Attachment C-III to this appendix
or a comparable formula1) such that a dis-
charge from  the facility would shut clown  a
public drinking water intake2?
  Yes	No	
  5. Does the facility have a total oil storage
capacity greater than or equal to 1 million
gallons and has the facility experienced a re-
portable oil discharge in an amount greater
than or equal to 10,000 gallons within the last
5 years?
  Yes	No	

                Certification
  I certify under penalty of law that 1 have
personally examined and am  familiar with
the information submitted in this document,
  !lf  a comparable formula  is used, docu-
mentation of the reliability  and  analytical
soundness of the  comparable formula must
be attached to this form.
  2 For the purposes of 40 CFR part 112, pub-
lic drinking water intakes are analogous to
public water systems as described at 40 CFR
                          Pt.  112, App. C

and that based on my inquiry of those indi-
viduals responsible for obtaining this infor-
mation. I believe  that the submitted infor
mation is true, accurate, and complete.
Signature
Name (please type or print)
Title
Date

   ATTACHMENT C-III -CALCULATION OF THE
            PLANNING DISTANCE

              1.0  Introduction

  1.1  The  facility  owner or  operator  must
evaluate whether the facility is located at a
distance such that a discharge from the fa-
cility could cause injury to fish and wildlife
and sensitive  environments or disrupt  oper-
ations at a puhlic drinking water  intake. To
quantify that distance.  EPA considered  oil
transport mechanisms over land and on still,
tidal  Influence,  and moving navigable wa-
ters. EPA has determined that  the primary
concern  for calculation of a planning dis
tance is the transport of oil in navigable wa-
ters  during  adverse weather  conditions.
Therefore, two formulas have been developed
to determine distances for planning purposes
from the point of discharge at the facility to
the potential  site of impact on moving and
still waters, respectively. The formula for oil
transport  on moving  navigable  water  is
based on the velocity of the water body and
the time interval for arrival of response re-
sources. The still water formula accounts for
the spread  of discharged oil over the surface
of the water.  The method to determine  oil
transport on tidal influence areas is based on
the type of oil discharged and the distance
down  current during ehh ride and  up current
during flood tide to  the point of maximum
tidal influence.
  1.2  EPA's formulas were  designed to be
simple to use. However,  facility  owners or
operators may calculate planning distances
using   more sophisticated formulas, which
take into account broader scientific or  engi-
neering principles, or local conditions.  Such
comparable formulas may result in different
planning distances  than EPA's formulas. In
the event that an alternative formula that is
comparable to one  contained in this appen-
dix is used to evaluate the criterion  in 41)
CFR  112.20(0 (l)(ii)(B)  or  (f)(l)(ii)(C).  the
owner or operator  shall attach documenta-
tion to the response plan cover  sheet con-
tained in Appendix F to this part that  dem-
onstrates  the  reliability  and   analytical
soundness  of  the alternative formula and
shall  notify the Regional  Administrator in
                                           53

-------
Pt. 112, App. C

writing  that  an  alternative formula  was
used,'
  1.3  A regulated facility may meet the cri
teria  for the  potential TO cause substantial
harm to the environment without  having to
perform a planning distance calculation. For
facilities that meet the substantial harm cri-
teria  because of inadequate secondary  con
talriment or oil spill history, as listed in the
flowchart In Attachment C-l to this appen-
dix, calculation of the planning distance is
unnecessary. For facilities  that do not meet
the substantial harm  criteria for secondary
containment or oil spill history as listed in
the flowchart, calculation of a planning dis-
tance for proximity to fish and wildlife and
sensitive environments and public  drinking
water intakes is  required,  unless it is clear
without performing the calculation (e.g.. the
facility is  located in  a wetland) that these
areas would be impacted.
  1A  A facility owner or operat or who must
perform a  planning distance  calculation an
navigable water is only required to  do so for
the type of navigable  water conditions  (i.e..
moving water, still water, or  tidal  influ-
enced water)  applicable to the  facility. If a
facility owner or operator determines  that
more than one type of navigable water condi-
tion applies, then the  facility owner or oper-
ator is  required to perform a planning dis-
tance calculation for  each navigable water
type to determine the greatest single dis-
tance that oil may be transported. As a re-
sult,  the  final planning  distance  for oil
transport on water shall Ite the greatest  indi-
vidual distance rather than a summation of
each calculated planning distance.
  1.5  The   planning   distance  formula  for
transport  on moving waterways  contains
three variables: the velocity of the navigable
water (v), the response time interval (t). and
a conversion factor (c). The velocity, v, is de-
termined hy using the Chezy-Manning equa-
tion, which, in  this case,  models  the flood
flow rate of  water in open  channels.  The
Chezy-Manning equation contains three vari-
ables which must be determined hy facility
owners  or  operators.  Manning's Roughness
  1 For persistent oils or non-persistent oils.
a worst case trajectory model (i.e., an  alter-
native formula) may be substituted for the
distance formulas described in still, moving,
and tidal waters, subject to Regional Admin
istrator's review of the model. An example of
an alternative formula that is comparable to
the one contained In this appendix would be
a worst case trajectory calculation based on
credible adverse winds, currents, and/or rive;r
stages, over a range of seasons, weather con-
ditions, and river stages. Based on historical
information or a spill trajectory model, the
Agency may require that additional fish and
wildlife and sensitive environments or public
drinking water Intakes also be protected.
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-05 Edition)

Coefficient (for flood flow rates), n, fan be
determined from Table  1 of this attachment.
The hydraulic radius,  r. can  l>e estimated
using the average  mid-clinnnel  depth from
charts provided  hy  the sources  listed  in
Table  2  of this attachment.  The average
slope of the river, s, can be determined using
topographic maps that  can be ordered from
the  U.S.  Geological Survey,  as  listed  In
Table 2 of this attachment.
  l.fi  Table 3  of Oils  attachment contains
specified time intervals for estimating the
arrival of response resources at the scene of
a discharge. Assuming no prior planning, re-
sponse resources should be able to arrive at
the discharge  site within 12 hcurs of the dis-
covery of any oil discharge in Higher Volume
Port Areas and within 24 hours in Great
Lakes and all  other river, canal, inland, and
nearshore areas. The specified time intervals
in Table 3 of Appendix  C are to be used only
to aid  In the Identification of whether a fa-
cility could cause  substantial harm  to the
environment.  Once  it is determined  that a
plan must be  developed for the facility, the
owner or operator shall reference Appendix E
to  tfiis part  to determine appropriate  re-
source levels and response times. The speci-
fied time intervals of this appendix include a
3-hour time period for  deployment  of boom
and other response equipment. The Regional
Administrator may identify additional areas
as appropriate.

2.0  Oil Transport on Moving Navigable Waters
  2.1  The facility  owner or operator must
use the following formula or  a comparable
formula  as described in §H2.20(a)(3) to cal-
culate the planning distance for oil transport
on moving navigable water:
d=vxtxc; where
d: the  distance downstream from a  facility
  within which fish and wildlife and sensitive
  environments could be injured or a public
  drinking water intake would be shut down
  In the event  of an oil discharge (in  miles);
v: the velocity of the river/navigable water of
  concern (in ft/sec)  as determined by Chezy-
  Mannirig's equation (see below and Tables I
  and 2 of this attachment):
t: the time interval specified in Table 3 based
  upon the type of water body and location
  (in hours); and
c: constant conversion  factor 0.68 secw mile/
  hrffl ft (3600 sec/hr * 5280 ft/mile).
  2.2 Chezy-Manning's equation is used to de-
termine velocity:
v=l.S/nxr%xs'/z; where
vthe velocity of tin- river of concern (in  ft/
  sec);
n-Mann!iig's   Roughness  Coefficient  from
  Table 1 of this attachment;
r-the hydraulic radius; the hydraulic radius
  can be  approximated for parabolic  chan-
  nels by multiplying the average mid chan-
  nel depth of the  river  (in  feet)  by 0.667
                                           54

-------
Environmental Protection Agency

  (sources  for obtaining  the  mid-fhannel
  depth are listed in Table 2 of this attach-
  ment); and
s=the average slope of the river (unit less) ob-
  tained from U.S. Geological Survey topo-
  graphic maps at the address listed in Table
  2 of this attachment.

TABLE 1—MANNING'S ROUGHNESS COEFFICIENT
     ,     FOR NATURAL STREAMS
  [NOTE: Coefficients are presented lor high flow rates at or
               near flood stage.)
Stream description
Minor Streams (Top Width <100 ft.)
Clean:
Straight
Winding 	
Sluggish (Weedy, deep pools);

Major Streams (Top Width >100 r|.)
Regular section:
Irregular section:
(Brush)

Rough-
ness co-
efficient
(n)
0 03
0 G4
0 06
0 10
0 035
0 05

TABLE 2—SOURCES OF R AND s FOR THL CHLZY-
            M ANN INC EQUATION
All of the charts and related publications fnr
navigational waters may be ordered from:
Distribution Branch
(N/CG33)
National Ocean Service
Riverdale, Maryland 20737-1199
Phone: (301) 136-6990
There will be a charge for materials ordered
  and a VISA or Mastercard will he arcepted.
The mid-channel depth to he  used in the cal-
culation of the hydraulic radius  (r)  can be
obtained directly from the following sources:
Charts of Canadian Coastal and Great Lakes
  Waters:
Canadian Hydrographlc Service
Department of Fisheries and  Oceans Insti-
  tute
P.O. Box 8080
1675 Russell Road
Ottawa. Ontario K1G 3H6
Canada
Phone: (613) 998-4931
Chares and Maps  of  Lower Mississippi River
(Gulf of  Mexico  to  Ohio  River and  St.
  Francis,     White,     Big     Sunflower,
  Atchafalaya, and other rivers):
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Vicksbutg District
P.O. Box 60
Vicksburg, Mississippi 39180
Phone: (601) 634-50(10
Charts of Upper  Mississippi  River and  Illi-
  nois Waterway to Lake Michigan:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Rock Island District
P.O. Box 2004
                          Pt.  112, App. C

Rock Island, Illinois 61204
Phone: (309) 794-5552
Charts of Missouri River:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Omaha District
6014 U.S. Post Office and Courthouse
Omaha, Nebraska 68102
Phone: (402) 221-39(10
Charts of Ohki River:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Ohio River Division
P.O. Box 1159
Cincinnati. Ohio 45201
Phone: (513) 6S4-3002
Charts of Tennessee Valley  Authority Res-
  ervoirs, Tennessee River and Tributaries:
Tennessee Valley Authority
Maps and Engineering Section
416 Union Avenue
Knoxville. Tennessee 37902
Phone: (615) 632-2921
Charts  of  Black  Warrior  River,  Alabama
  River,   Tornbighee  River.  Apalachicola
  River and Pearl River:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Mobile District
P.O. Box 2288
Mobile, Alabama 36628-0001
Phone: (205) 6»0-2511
The average slope of the river (s) may be  ob-
tained from topographic maps:
U.S. Geological Survey
Map Distribution
Federal Center
Bldg. 41
Box 25286
Denver, Colorado 80225
Additional information  can be obtained from
the following sources:
1.  The  State's Department  of Natural Re-
  sources (DNR) or the  State's Aids to Navi
  gation office:
2. A knowledgeable local marina operator; or
3.  A  knowledgeable local water authority
  (e.g., State water commission)
  2.3  1 lie average slope of the river (s) can
he  determined from the topographic maps
using the following steps:
  (1) Locate the facility on the map.
  (2) Find the Normal Pool Elevation at  the
point of discharge from the facility into the
water (A).
  (3) Find the Normal Pool  Elevation of the
public drinking water  intake  or  fish  and
wildlife  and  sensitive environment  located
downstream (B) (Note:  The  owner  or oper-
ator should use a minimum of 20 miles dowrr
stream  as  a cutoff to obtain  the average
slope if the  location  of a  specific  public
drinking water  intake  or fish and wildlife
and sensitive environment is  unknown).
  (4)  If ihe Normal Pool  Elevation  is not
available, the elevation contours can be used
to lind the slope. Determine  elevation of the
water at the  point of discharge from the fa
cillty  (A).  Determine the elevation of  the
                                          55

-------
Pt.  112, App. C

water  at.  the appropriate?  distance  down-
stream (B). The formula presented below can
be used to calculate the slope.
  (5) Determine  the distance  (In  miles) be-
tween  the facility  anri  the  public: drinking
water  Intake or fish and wildlife and sen-
sitive environments (C).
  (6) Use the following  formula to find the
slope, which will lie a unitless value: Average
Slope-i(A-B)  (ft.)/C (miles)]  x  |1  mile/5280
feet]
  2.4  If It is not feasible to  determine the
slope and mid-channel depth  by the  Chezy-
Manning equation,  then the  river velocity
can  be  approximated  on- sitf.  A specific
length, such as  100 feet, ran  be marked off
along the shoreline. A float can be dropped
into the stream .ibove  the mark, and the
time required for the float to  travel the dis-
tance can be used to determine  the velocity
In feet per second. However, this method will
not yield an  average velocity  fcir the length
of the stream, but a velocity only for the
specific  location (if measurement. In addi-
tion,  the flow rate will vary depending  on
weather conditions such as wind  and rainfall.
It is  recommended that facility  owners or
operators repeat the measurement under a
variety of conditions to obtain the most ac-
curate estimate of the surface  water velocity
under adverse weather conditions.
  2.5  The planning distance calculations for
moving and still navigable waters are based
on worst case discharges of persistent oils.
Persistent oils art  of concern Tiecause they
can remain iti the water for significant peri-
ods of time and can potentially exist In large
quantities downstream.  Owners or operators
of facilities that store persistent  as well as
non-persistent oils may use  a  comparable
formula. The volume (if oil discharged is not
Included as part of the planning distance cal-
culation for moving navigable  waters. Facili-
ties that will meet this substantial harm cri-
terion  are  those  with  facility  capacities
greater than or equal to 1 million  gallons. It
Is assumed that  these facilities are capable
of having an oil discharge of sufficient quan-
tity to cause  injury to fish and  wildlife and
sensitive environments or shut down a public
drinking water intake. While owners or oper-
ators of transfer facilities that store greater
than or equal to 42,000 gallons are not re-
quired to use a planning distance formula for
purposes of  the  substantial  harm criteria,
they should use a planning distance calcula-
tion In the development of facility specific
response plans.

     TABLE 3—SPECIRED TIME INTERVALS
  Operating
   areas
Higher volume
  port area.
Great Lakes ...
   Substantial harm planning time (hrs)
12 hour  arnvakS  hour deployment-is
  hours.
24 hour  arrival+3  hour deployment-??
  hours.
                                             40 CFR Ch. I  (7-1-05 Edition)

                                      TABLE 3— SPECIFIED TIME INTERVALS—
                                                   Continued
Operating
areas
All other rivers
and canals,
inland, and
nearshore
areas.
Substantial harm planning time (hrs)
24 hour
hours,
arrivals hour deptoyment-27
  2.6  Example of the  Planning Distance  Cal-
culation for Oil Transport on Moving Navigable
Waters. The  following example  provides a
sample calculation  using the planning  dis-
tance formula for a facility  discharging oil
into the Monongahela  River:
  (1) Solve for v by evaluating n,  r, and s for
the Chfizy-Manning equation:
  Find the roughness coefficient,  n, on Table
I of this attachment fcir a regular section of
a  major stream with a top  width  greater
than 100 feet. The top width of the river can
he found from the topographic map.
n=0.035.
Find slope, s. where A=727 feet,  B=710 feet.
  and C-2S miles.
Solving:
s-|(727  ft-1710  ft)/25  miles]xjl rnile/5280
  feet|-1.3xlO-«
  The average mid-channel depth is found by
averaging  the mid-channel depth for  each
mile along the  length of the river  between
the facility and the public.? drinking water in-
take or the fish or wildlife or sensitive envi-
ronment (or  20 miles downstream if  applica-
ble). This value is multiplied hy  0.667 to ob-
tain the hydraulic radius.  The mid-channel
depth is found, by obtaining values for r and
s from the sources shown in  Table 2 for the
Monongahela River.
Solving:
r-0.667x20 feet=13.33 feet
Solve for v using:
v^l.S/nxr2"**"2:
v.|1.5/O.II35)x(13.33)2»x(1.3xlO-«)1/;:
v=2.73 fret/second
  (2) Find t from Table 3 of this attachment.
The Monongahela River's resource response
time is 27 hours.
  (3) Solve fnr planning distance, d:
d=vxtxc
d=(2.73  ft/ser)x(27 hours)x(l).68 sects mile/hra
  ft)
d=50 miles
Therefore, 50 miles downstream Is the appro
priate planning distance for this facility.

       3.0 Oil Transport on Still Water
  3.1  For bodies of water including  lakes or
ponds that do not have a measurable veloc-
ity, the spreading of the oil over  the surface
must  be considered. Owners or operators of
facilities  located next to still water bodies
may use a comparable means of  calculating
                                           56

-------
Environmental Protection Agency

the planning distance. If a comparable  for-
mula is used,  documentation of the  reli-
ability and analytical soundness of the com-
parable calculation must he attached to the
response plan cover sheet.
  3.2  Example  of the  Planning Distance  Cal-
culation for Oi/ Transport on Still Water. To as-
sist those facilities  which  could potentially
discharge into  a still  body of water, the fol-
lowing analysis was performed to provide an
example of the  type of formula that may be
used to calculate the  planning distance.  For
this example,   a worst  case  discharge of
2,000,000 gallons is used.
  (1) The surface area in  square feet covered
by an oil discharge on still water, Al, can be
determined by the following formula,2 where
V is the volume of the discharge in gallons
and C Is a constant conversion factor:
C=0.1643
Al-10'x(2,000.0«0gallons)y»x(0.1643)
A, -8.74x10" ft'
  (2} The spreading formula is based on the
theoretical condition that the oil will spread
uniformly in all directions forming a circle.
In reality, the  outfall  of the  discharge  will
direct the oil  to the  surface  of the  water
when- it  intellects the shoreline Although
the oil will not spread uniformly in all direc-
tions, it is assumed that the  discharge  will
spread from the shoreline into a semi circle
(this  assumpi ion does not account for winds
or wave action).
  (3) The area of a circle-t r2
  (4) To account for the assumption  that oil
will spread in a semi-circular shape, the area
of a circle is divided by 2 and is designated as
A2.
A2-(t r>}/2
Solving for the radius, r, using the relation-
  ship Ai=Az: 8.74xlO« ft-'=(t!V2
Therefore, r-23,586 ft
r-23,586 ft»S.280 ft/mileH.5 miles
Assuming a 20  knot wind under storm condi-
  tions:
1 knot=1.15 miles/hour
20knotsxl.l5 mlles/hour/knot=23 miles/hi
Assuming that  the oil  slick moves at  3  per-
  cent of the wind's speed:3
23 miles/hourxfl. 03=0.69 miles/hour

  (5)  To estimate the  distance that the oil
will travel, use the times required tor re-
sponse resources to arrive at  different,  geo-
graphic locations as shown In Table 3 of this
attachment.
For example:
  ZHuang, J.C. and Monastcrti. K.C.. 1982. Re-
view  of the  State-oi-the-Art of Oil Pollution
Models. Final report submitted to  the Amer-
ican Petroleum Institute by Raytheon Ocean
Systems, Co.. East Providence. Rhode Island.
  JO;; Spill  Prevention  &  Control. National
Spill  Control  School,  Corpus Christi  State
University, Thirteenth Edition. May 1990.
                          Pf. 112, App. C

For Higher Volume Port  Areas:  15  hrsxO.69
  rniles/hr^lO.4 miles
For  Great  Lakes  and  all  other areas:  '11
  hrsxO.69 miles/hr=18.6 miles

  (6) The total distance  that the  oil will
travel  from the point of discharge, including
the distance due to spreading, is calculated
as follows:
Higher Volume Port  Areas:  d=10.4f4.5 miles
  or approximately 15 miles
Great  Lakes and all other areas: d=18.6+4.5
  miles or approximately 23 miles

  4.0   Oil Transport on Tidal-Influence Areas

  4.1  The  planning   distance method  for
tidal influence navigable  water is based on
worst case discharges of persistent and non
persistent oils. Persistent oils are of  primary
concern hecause they can potentially cause
harm over a greater distance. For persistent
oils discharged into  tidal waters, the plan-
ning distance  is  15 miles from the  facility
down  current  during ehh  tide and  to  the
point  of  maximum  tidal  influence  or  15
miles,  whichever is less,  during flood  tide.
  4.2  For non-persistent oils discharged into
tiiial waters, the planning  distance Is 5 miles
from the facility down current  during ehh
tide and to the point of maximum tidal influ-
ence or  5 miles,  whichever is less, during
Hood tide.
  4.3  Example of Determining the  Planning
Distance   for Two  Types of Navigable Water
Conditions. Below is an example of how to de
tcrmine the proper planning distance when a
facility could impact two  types of navigahle
water  conditions:  moving water  and tidal
water.
  (1) Facility X stores persistent oil and is
located downstream from  locks along a slow
moving river which is affected by tides. The
river velocity, v,  Is determined to he 0.5 feet/
second from the  Chezy-Manning equation
used to  calculate  oil transport  on  moving
navigahle waters. The specified time inter-
val, t,  obtained from Table  3 of this attach-
mcnt for  river areas is  27 hours. Therefore,
solving for the planning  distance, d:
ri=vxtxc
d=(0.5 ft/sec)x(27 hours)x(0.68 secmile/hrft)
d=9.18  miles.
  (2)  However, the  planning distance  for
maximum tidal influence  down current dur-
ing ebb t.lde is 15 miles, which is greater than
the calculated 9.18 miles. Therefore,  15 miles
downstream is the appropriate planning dis-
tance for  this facility.

        5.0  Oil Transport  Over Land

  5.1   Facility owners  or  operators must
evaluate  the potential  for  ail to be  trans-
ported over land to navigable waters of the
United States. The owner or operator must
evaluate  the likelihood that portions of a
worst  case  discharge would reach navigable
                                           57

-------
Pt.  112, App. C

waters via open channel flow or from  sheet
flow across the land,  or  be prevented from
reaching navigable waters  when trapped  in
natural or man-made  depressions excluding
secondary containment structures.
  5.2  As discharged oil travels over land, it
may enter a storm drain or open  concrete
channel intended for drainage. It is  assumed
that once oil  reaches  such an inlet, it will
flow into the receiving navigable water. Dur-
ing a storm event, it is highly probable that
the oil  will either  flow  into the  drainage
structures or follow the natural contours of
the land and flow into the  navigable water.
Expected minimum and maximum velocities
are provided as examples of open  concrete
channel  and pipe  flow.  The  ranges  listed
below reflect  minimum and maximum  ve-
locities used as design criteria.' The calcula-
tion below demonstrates that the  time re-
quired for oil to travel through a storm drain
or open concrete channel to navigable water
is negligible arid can be considered instanta-
neous. The velocities are:
For open concrete channels:
maximum velocity=25 feet per second
minimum veloclty-3 feet per second
For storm drains:
maximum velocity-25 feet per second
minimum velocity-2 feet per second
  S.3  Assuming a length of 0.5 mile  from the
point of discharge through an open  concrete
channel or concrete storm  drain  to a navi-
gable water, the travel times (distance/veloc-
ity) are:
1.8 minutes at a velocity of 25 fei-t per second
14.7 minutes at a velocity of 3 feet per second
22.0 minutes for at a  velocity of 2 feet per
  second
  5.4  The distances that shall be considered
to determine the planning distance are illus-
trated in Figure C-l of this attachment. The
relevant distances  can he  described as fol-
lows:
Dl=Distance from  the nearest opportunity
  for discharge. X  i, to u storm drain or an
  open concrete channel leading to navigable
  water.
D2=Distance through  the  storm  drain  or
  open concrete channel to navigable water.
D3=Dlstance downstream  from the outfall
  within which fish and wildlife arid  sensitive
  4The design velocities were obtained from
Howard  County,  Maryland  Department  of
Public Works' Storm Drainage Design Man-
ual.
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-05 Edition)

  environments could be injured or a public
  drinking water intake would he shut down
  as determined  hy the  planning  distance
  formula.
U4 "Distance from the  nearest opportunity
  for discharge,  X2, to fish and wildlife and
  sensitive environments riot bordering navi-
  gable waver.

  5.5  A  facility  owner or operator  whose
nearest opportunity  for discharge is located
within 0.5 mile  of a navigable water must
complete the  planning  distance calculation
(D3) for the: type of navigable water near the
facility or use a comparable formula.
  5.6  A facility that is  located at a distance
greater than 0.5 mile from a navigable water
must also calculate a planning distance (D3)
if It is  in close proximity (i.e.. Dl is less than
(1.5  mile  and other factors are conducive  to
oil  travel  over  land) to  storm drains  thac
flow to navigable waters. Factors to be con-
sidered in assessing  oil transport over land
to storm drains shall include the topography
of the  surrounding area,  drainage patterns.
man-made  barriers  (excluding  secondary
containment structures), and  soil  distribu-
tion and porosity. Storm drains or  concrete
drainage channels that are located in close
proximity to the facility can provide a direct
pathway to navigable waters, regardless  of
the length of the drainage pipe. If Dl is less
than or equal to 0.5 mile, a discharge from
I he facility could pose substantial harm be-
cause the 1 ime to travel the distance from
the storm drain to the  navigable water (D2)
is virtually instantaneous.
  5.7  A facility's proximity to fish and wild-
life  and  sensitive environments  not  bor-
dering a navigable water,  as depicted as D4
in Figure C-I  of this attachment, must also
be  considered,  regardless  of the  distance
from the facility  to navigable  waters.  Fac-
tors to be considered in assessing oil trans-
port over hind to fish and  wildlife  and sen-
sitive  environments should include the to-
pography of the  surrounding area,  drainage
patterns, man-made barriers (excluding sec-
ondary containment  structures), and soil dis-
tribution and porosity.
  5.8  If  a facility Is not  found to pose sub-
stantial  harm to  fish  and wildlife  and sen-
sitive environments  riot bordering navigable
waters via oil transport on land, then sup-
porting documentation should be maintained
at the facility. However, such documentation
should he submitted with  the response plan
if a facility  is  found  to  pose substantial
harm.
                                           58

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
Pt. 112, App. C
     D
[59 FR 34102. July 1. 1994, as amended at 65 FR 40798, June 30. 2000; 67 FR 4715Z. July 17. 20021
                                       59

-------
Pt. 112, App. D

APPENDIX  D TO PART  IIZ—DETERMINA-
    TION OF  A WORST  CASE DISCHARGE
    PLANNING VOLUME

              1.0  Instructions
  1,1  An owner or  operator  is  required  to
complete this worksheet If the facility meets
the criteria, as presented in  Appendix C  to
this part, or it is determined by the RA that
the facility could cause substantial harm  to
the environment, The calculation of a worst
case discharge planning volume is used  for
emergency  planning purposes,  and  is  re-
quired in 40 CFR 112.20 for facility owners  or
operators who must  prepare a response plan.
When planning for the  amount of resources
and equipment necessary to respond to the
worst case  discharge planning volume, ad-
verse weather conditions must he taken into
consideration.  An owner  or operator is  re-
quired to determine  the facility's worst case
discharge planning volume from either part
A of this appendix for an onshore storage fa-
cility, or part B of this appendix for an on-
shore  production facility.  The  worksheet
considers the  provision  of  adequate sec-
ondary containment at a facility.
  1.2  For onshore storage facilities and pro-
duction  facilities, permanently  manifolded
oil storage  tanks are defined as tanks that
are designed, installed, and/or operated  In
such a manner that the multiple tanks func-
tion as one storage unit (i.e., multiple tank
volumes are equalized). In a worst case dis-
charge scenario, a single failure  could cause
the discharge of the contents of more than
one tank. The owner or operator must pro-
vide evidence in the response plan that tanks
with  common piping or piping systems are
not operated as one  unit.  If such evidence Is
provided and  is acceptable to the RA, the
worst case discharge planning volume would
be based on the capacity of  the largest  oil
storage  tank within a common secondary
containment area or the  largest oil storage
tank  within a single secondary containment
area,  whichever is greater. For permanently
manifolded  tanks that function as one  oil
storage unit, the worst case discharge plan-
ning volume would be based on the combined
oil storage capacity of all manifolded tanks
or the capacity of the largest single oil stor-
age tank within a  secondary containment
area,  whichever is greater. For  purposes  of
this  rule,  permanently  manifolded  tanks
that are separated by internal divisions  for
each tank are considered to be single tanks
and Individual manifolded tank volumes are
not combined.
  1.3  For production facilities, the presence
of exploratory wells, production wells, and
oil storage  tanks must be considered  in the
calculation. Part B of this  appendix takes
these additional  factors  into consideration
arid provides steps for their inclusion  in the
total  worst  case discharge planning volume.
           40 CFR Ch. I  <7-1-05 Edition)

Onshore oil production facilities may include
all wells,  flowllnes, separation  equipment,
storage facilities, gathering lines, and auxil-
iary  nori-transportation-relatud  equipment
and facilities in a single geographical oil  or
gas field operated by a single operator. Al-
though a  potential worst  case discharge
planning volume  is calculated within each
section of the worksheet, the  final worst
erase amount depends on the risk parameter
that results in the greatest volume.
  1.4  Marine transportation-related transfer
facilities that contain fixed aboveground on-
shore structures used for bulk oil storage are
jointly regulated by EPA and the U.S. Coast
Guard (USCG), and are termed "complexes."
Because the  USCG  also  requires response
plans  from transportation-related facilities
to address a worst  case discharge of oil, a
separate calculation for the worst case dis-
charge planning volume for USCG-related fa-
cilities is included in the USCG IFR (see Ap-
pendix  E to  this part,  section 13, for avail-
ability). Alt complexes  that are jointly regu-
lated by EPA and the  USCG must compare
both  calculations for worst case discharge
planning volume derived by using the EPA
and USCG  methodologies and plan for which-
ever volume is greater.

PART A: WORST CASE DISCHARGE PLAN
  N1NG VOLUME CALCULATION FOR ON-
  SHORE STORAGE FACILITIES'

  Part  A of this worksheet  is  to be com
pleted by the owner ur  operator of an SPCC-
rfegulated facility (excluding oil  production
facilities) if the facility meets the criteria  as
presented in  Appendix C to this part, or if it
is determined by the RA that  the  facility
could cause substantial harm to the environ-
ment. If you are the owner or operator of a
production facility,  please proceed to part B
of this worksheet.

       A.I  SINGLE-TANK  FACILITIES

  For facilities containing only  one above-
ground oil storage tank, the worst case dis-
charge planning volume equals the capacity
of the oil storage  tank.  If adequate  sec-
ondary containment (sufficiently large  to
contain the capacity of the aboveground oil
storage  tank  plus  sufficient  freeboard  to
allow for  precipitation)  exists  for  the  oil
storage tank, multiply the  capacity of the
tank  by 0.8.
  (1)   FINAL  WORST   CASE   VOLUME:
	GAL
  (2) Do not proceed further.

  '"Storage  facilities" represent all facili-
ties subject  to this part, excluding oil pro-
duction facilities.
                                           60

-------
Environmental Protection Agency

    A.Z  SECONDARY CONTAINMENT -
       MUL T1PLE-TANK FACILITIES
  Are all aboveground oil storage  tanks or
groups of aboveground oil storage  tanks at
the facility without adequate secondary con-
tainment?2
	(Y/N)
  A.2,1  If the answer Is yes, the final worst
case discharge planning volume equals the
total abovegrotmti oil storage capacity at the fa-
cility.
  (1)  FINAL  WORST   CASE  VOLUME:
	GAL
  (2) Do not proceed further.
  A.2.2  If the answer is no, calculate the
total  ahoveground oil storage  capacity of
tanks without adequate  secondary contain-
ment. If all aboveground oil storage tanks or
groups of ahoveground. oil storage  tanks at.
the facility have  adequate  secondary con
talnment, ENTER  "0" (zero).
	GAL
  A.2.3  Calculate  the capacity of the largest
single ahoveground oil storage  tank within
an adequate secondary containment area or
the combined capacity of a group of above
ground   oil   storage  tanks  permanently
manifolded  together, whichever is  greater.
PLUS  THE   VOLUME  FROM  QUESTION
A.2.2.
  FINAL  WORST  CASE  VOLUME:1	
GAL

PART B: WORST CASE DISCHARGE PLAN-
  NING VOLUME  CALCULATION FOR  ON
  SHORE PRODUCTION FACILITIES
  Part B of this worksheet is to lie completed
by the owner or operator of an SPCC-regu
lated oil  production facility  if the facility
meets the criteria presented in Appendix  C
to this part, or if it is determined by the RA
that the facility  could  cause substantial
harm. A production facility consists  of all
wells (producing  arid  exploratory)  and re-
lated equipment in a single geographical oil
or gas field operated by a single operator.

      B. I  SINGLE TANK FACILITIES
  B. 1.1  For facilities  containing only  one
ahoveground oil storage tank, the worst case
discharge planning volume equals the capac-
ity of the aboveground oil storage tank plus
the production volume of the well  with the
highest  output at the facility.  If  adequate
  2 Secondary containment is described in 40
CFR part 112, subparts A through C. Accept-
able methods and structures for containment
are also given in 40 CFR 112.7(c)(l).
  3All  complexes that are jointly regulated
by  EPA  and the USCG must  also calculate
the worst case discharge planning volume for
the transportation related portions of the fa-
cility  and  plan for whichever  volume  is
greater.
                          Pr. 112, App, D

secondary containment  (sufficiently large lo
contain the capacity of the aboveground oil
storage tank plus sufficient  freeboard  to
allow for precipitation) exists for the storage
tank, multiply the capacity of  the tank by
0.8.
  B. 1.2  For facilities with production wells
producing by pumping, if the rate of the well
with the highest output  Is known and  the
number of days the facility  is unattended
can he predicted, then the production volume
is equal to the pumping rate of the well mul-
tiplied by the greatest number of days  the
facility Is unattended.
  B.I.3  If the pumping  rate of the well with
the highest  output  is estimated or the max-
imum  number of days  the  facility Is unat-
tended is estimated, then the production vol-
ume is determined from the pumping rate of
the well multiplied hy 1.5 times the greatest
number of days that the facility has been or
is expected to be unattended.
  B.I.4  Attachment D-l  to  this appendix
provides methods for calculating the produc-
tion volume for exploratory wells and pro
duction wells producing under  pressure.
  (1)   FINAL  WORST  CASE  VOLUME:
	GAL
  (2} Do not proceed further.

    B.i  SECONDARY CONTAINMENT-
       MULTIPLE- TANK FACILITIES
  Are  all aboveground oil storage tanks or
groups of aboveground  oil storage tanks at
the facility without adequate secondary con-
tainment?
	(Y/N)
  B.2.1  If the answer is yes, the final worst
case volume equals  the total aboveground oil
storage capacity without adequate secondary1
containment plus the production volume of
the well with the highest output at the facil
ity.
  (1) For facilities with production wells pro
due ing by pumping, if  the  rate of lire well
with the highest output  is known and  the
number of days the facility  Is unattended
can be predicted, then the production volume
Is equal to the pumping rate of the well mul-
tiplied by the greatest number of days  the
facility is unattended.
  (2) If the pumping rate of the well with the
highest output is estimated or the maximum
number of days the facility is unattended is
estimated, then the production volume is dc;-
tennined from the  pumping rate of the well
multiplied by 1.5 times the greatest  number
of days that the facility  has  been or is ex-
pected 1.0 be unattended.
  (i!) Attachment D-l to  this appendix pro-
vides methods for calculating the production
volumes for exploratory  wells  and  produc-
tion wells producing under pressure.
  (A)   FINAL  WORST  CASE  VOLUME:
	GAL
  (B) Do not proceed further.
                                          61

-------
Pt. 112, App. D

  B.2.2  If  the answer  is no, calculate the
total aboveground oil  storage  rapacity of
tanks without adequate secondary contain-
ment. If all aboveground oil storage tanks or
groups of abovegrounri  oil storage tanks at
the  facility  have adequate  secondary con-
tainment. ENTER "0" (zero).
	GAL
  B.2.3  Calculate the capacity of the largest
single aboveground oil  storage  tank within
an adequate  secondary  containment area or
the combined capacity  of a group of above-
ground   oil   storage   tanks  permanently
manifolded  together, whichever is  greater.
plus the production volume of the well with
the  highest  output,  PLUS  THE VOLUME
FROM  QUESTION  B.2.2.  Attachment  D-l
provides methods for calculating the produc-
tion volumes for exploratory wells and pro-
duction wells producing under pressure.
  (1)  FINAL  WORST  CASE   VOLUME:*
	GAL
  (2) Do not proceed further.

        ATTACHMENTS TO APPENDIX D

ATTACHMENT  D-I—METHODS  TO  CALCULATE
  PRODUCTION VOLUMES FOR PRODUCTION FA-
  CILITIES WITH EXPLORATORY WILLS OR PRO-
  DUCTION  WELLS PRODUCING UNDER  PRES-
  SURE

              l.O  Introduction
  The owner or operator of a production fa-
cility with exploratory wells or production
wells producing  under  pressure shall  com-
pare the well rate of the highest output well
(rate of well), in barrels per day, to the abil-
ity of response  equipment and personnel to
recover the volume of oil that could be dis-
charged (rate of recovery), In barrels per day.
The result  of this comparison will determine
the method used to calculate the production
volume for the production facility. This pro-
duction volume is to he used  to calculate the
worst case  discharge planning volume in part
B of this appendix.

         2.0   Description of Methods
  2.1  Method A
  If the  well rate would overwhelm  the re
spouse efforts (I.e., rate of well/rate of recov
ery £1),  then the production volume would be
the  30-day forecasted well  rate for a well
10,000 feet  deep or less, or the 45-day fore
casted well rate for a well deeper than 10,000
feet.
  (1) For wells 10.000 feet deep or luss:
Production volume-30 days x rate of well.
  4 All complexes that are jointly  regulated
by EPA  arid the USCG must also  calculate
the worst case discharge planning volume for
the transportation-related portions of the fa-
cility  and  plan for whichever volume  is
greater.
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-05 Edition)

  (2) For wells deeper than 10,000 feet:
Production volume-45 days x rate of well.
  12  Method B
  2.2 1  If the  rate  of  recovery  would be
greater than the well rate (i.e., rate of well/
rate of recovery <1). then the production vol-
ume would equal the sum of two terms:
Production volurne=di!icharge vcilumet -t- dis-
  charge volume;
  2.2.2  The first term represents the volume
of the oil discharger! from the well between
the time of the blowout and the time the re-
sponse resources are on scene and recovering
oil (discharge volume:).
Discharge  volume |-(days  unattended+days
  to respond) x (rate of well)

  2.2.3  The second term represents the vol-
ume of oil discharged from the well after the
response resources hegin operating until the
discharge Is stopped,  adjusted for the recov-
ery rate of the response resources (discharge
volume J.
  (1) For wells 10,000 feet deep or less:
Discharge   volumQ-|30  days—(days  unat-
  tended + days to respond)! x (rate of well)
  x (rate of well/rate of recovery)
  (2) For wells deeper than 10,000 feet:
Discharge   volum§-|45  days—(days  unat-
  tended -f days to respond)! x (rate of well)
  x (rate cif well/rate of recovery)

                3.0  Example
  3.1  A facility consists of two production
wells producing under  pressure, which are
both less than 10,000 feet deep. The well rate
of well A is  5 barrels per day, and the well
rate of well B is 10 barrels per day. The  facil-
ity is unattended  for a maximum of 7  days.
The  facility  operator estimates, that it will
take 2 days to have response  equipment and
personnel on scene and responding to a blow
out. and that the  projected rate of recovery
will be 20 barrels per day.
  (1) First, the  facility operator determines
that the highest output well is well B. The
facility operator calculates the ratio of the
rate of well i:o the  rate of recovery:
10 barrels per day/20  barrels per day=0.5 Be-
  cause the ratio  is less than one,  the  facil-
  ity operator will use Method B to calculate
  the production volume.

  (2) The first term of the equation is:
Discharge volumei-(7 days + 2 days)  x (10
  barrels per day)=90 barrels

  (3) The second term of the equation is:
Discharge  volume z~[30 (lays—(7  days +  ;
  days)] x (10 barrels  per day) x (fl.5)=105 bar-
  rels

  (4) Therefore, the production volume is:
Production    volume-90   barrels   «•    105
  barrels~195 barrels
                                           62

-------
Environmental Protection Agency

  3.2  If the recovery rate was 5 barrels per
day, the ratio of rate of well to rate of recov-
ery would be 2, so the facility operator would
use Method A. The production volume would
have been:
30 days x 10 barrels per day=300 barrels
(59  FR  34110. July 1, 1994; 59 FR 49006, Sept.
26,  1994, as amended at 65 FR 40800, June 30,
2000; 67  FR 47152. July 17. 20021

APPENDIX E TO PART 112—DETERMINA-
    TION AND EVALUATION OF  REQUIRED
    RESPONSE RESOURCES FOR  FACILITY
    RESPONSE PLANS

         l.O  Purpose and Definitions
  1.1  The purpose of this appendix is to de-
scribe the procedures to identify response re-
sources to meet the requirements of §112.20.
To  identify response resources to meet the
facility  response plan  requirements  of 40
CFR 112.2Q(h), owners or  operators shall fol-
low this appendix or, where not appropriate,
shall clearly  demonstrate in the response
plan why use of this appendix is not appro-
priate at the facility and make comparable
arrangements for response resources.
  1.2  Definitions.
  1.2.1  Animal  fat  means  a  non-petroleum
oil, fat, or grease of animal, fish,  or  marine
mammal  origiit.  Animal  fats  are further
classified based  on specific gravity  as fol-
lows:
  (1) Group A—specific gravity less than 0.8.
  (2) Group B—specific gravity  equal to or
greater than 0.8 and less than  1.0.
  (3) Group C—specific gravity  equal to or
greater than 1.0.
  1.2.2  Nearshore is  an  operating area de-
fined as extending seaward 12 miles from the
boundary lines defined in 46 CFR part 7. ex-
cept in the Gulf of Mexico.  In the Gulf of
Mexico, it means the area extending 12 miles
from the line of demarcation (COLREG lines)
defined in 49 CFR 80.741) and 80.851).
  1.2.3  Non-persistent oils or Croup 1  oils in-
clude:
  (1) A  petroleum-based oil that, at the  time
of shipment,  consists of  hydrocarbon  frac-
tions:
  (A) At least 50 percent of which by volume.
distill at a temperature of 340 degrees C (S45
degrees F): and
  (B) At least 95 percent of which by volume,
distill at a temperature of 370 degrees C (700
degrees F); and
  (2) A non-petroleum oil. other than an ani-
mal fat or vegetahle oil, with a specific grav-
ity less than 0.8.
  1.2.4  Non-pt-'truleum ti/7 means  oil  of any
kind that  is not petroleum-based, including
but not limited to:  fats, oils, and  greasers of
animal, fish, or marine mammal  origin: and
vegetahle  oils,  including  oils  from seeds,
nuts, fruits, and kernels.
                           Pt.  112, App. E

  1.2.5  Ocean means the nearshore area.
  1.2.6  Operating ana means Rivers and Ca-
nals, Inland, Nearshore, and Great Lakes ge-
ographic  locatlon(s)  In which  a facility is
handling, storing, or transporting oil.
  1.2.7  Operating environment means Rivers
and Canals.  Inland, Great Lakes, or Ocean.
These  terms are used to define the condi-
tions in  which response  equipment is de-
signed to function.
  1,2.8  Persistent oils include:
  (1)  A petroleum-based oil that does  not
meet the distillation criteria for a non-per-
sistent oil. Persistent oils are further classi-
fied based on specific gravity as follows:
  (A) Group 2—specific gravity less than 0.85;
  (B) Group 3—specific gravity equal to or
greater than 0.85 and less than 0.95;
  (C)  Group 4—specific gravity equal to or
greater than 0.95 and less than 1.0; or
  (D) Group 5—specific gravity equal to or
greater than 1.0.
  (2) A non-petroleum oil. other than an ani
nial fat or vegetahle oil, with a  specific grav-
ity of 0.8 or greater. These oils are further
classified based  on specific  gravity  as  fol-
lows:
  (A) Group 2—specific  gravity equal to or
greater than 0.8 and less than 0.85;
  (B) Group 3—specific gravity equal to or
greater than 0.85 and less than 0.95;
  (C)  Group 4—specific gravity equal to or
greater than 0.95 and less than 1.0; or
  (D) Group 5—specific gravity equal to or
greater than 1.0.
  1.2.9  Vegetable oil means a non-petroleum
oil or fat of vegetahle origin, including but
not.  limited to  oils  and fats  derived from
plant seeds,  nuts, fruits, arid kernels. Vege-
tahle oils are further classified  based on spe-
cific gravity as follows:
  (1) Group A—specific gravity less than 0.8.
  (2) Group  B—specific gravity equal to or
greater than 0.8 arid less than 1.0.
  (3) Group C—specific gravity equal to or
greater than 1.0.
  1.2.10 Other definitions  are  included  in
§112.2, section 1.1 of Appendix C. and section
3.0 of Appendix F.

   2.0  Equipment Operability and Readiness

  2.1  All equipment  identified  in a response
plan must be designed to operate in the con-
ditions expected in the facility's geographic
area  (i.e..  operating environment). These
conditions vary widely based on location and
season. Therefore, it is difficult to identify a
single stockpile of response equipment that
will  function effectively  in  each geographic
location (i.e., operating area).
  2.2  Facilities handling, storing, or trans-
porting oil in more than one operating envi-
ronment  as indicated in  Table 1 of this ap-
pendix  must identify equipment capable of
successfully functioning In  each operating
environment.
                                           63

-------
Pt.  112. App. E

  2.3  When  identifying equipment  for  the
response plan (based on the use of this ap-
pendix),  a facility owner  or operator must
consider  the inherent  limitations  of  the
operabllity of equipment components and re-
sponse systems.  The criteria  in Table 1 of
this appendix shall be  used to evaluate the
operabllity  in a given (environment. These
criteria reflect the general conditions in cer-
tain operating environments.
  2.3.1  The Regional Administrator may re-
quire documentation that the  boom  identi-
fied In a facility response plan meets the cri-
teria in Table 1 of this appendix. Absent ac-
ceptable documentation, the  Regional Ad-
ministrator may require that  the boom  be
tested to demonstrate that it meets  the cri-
teria in Table  1  of this appendix.  Testing
must be in  accordance with  ASTM F 715,
ASTM lr 989. or other tests approved  by EPA
as  deemed appropriate  (see Appendix E  to
this part, section 13, for general availability
of documents),
  2.4  Table  1 of this appendix lists  criteria
for  oil recovery devices and boom. All other
equipment necessary to sustain or  support
response operations in an operating environ-
ment must be designed to  function in  the
same conditions. For example, boats that de-
ploy or support skimmers or boom must  be
capable of being safely operated in the sig-
nificant  wave heights listed for the applica-
ble  operating environment.
  2.5  A facility owner or operator shall refer
to  the applicable Area  Contingency Plan
(ACP), where available, to determine if ice,
debris, and weather-related visibility are sig-
nificant  factors to evaluate the operability
of equipment. The ACP  may also identify the
average  temperature ranges expected in the
facility's operating area. All equipment iden-
tified in a response plan must be designed to
operate within those conditions or ranges.
  2.6  This appendix provides information on
response resource mobilization and response
times. The distance of  the facility from the
storage  location of  the response  resources
must be used to determine  whether the re-
sources can arrive on-scene within the stated
time. A  facility owner or  operator shall In-
clude the time for notification,  mobilization,
and travel of resources identified to meet the
medium and Tier 1  worst case  discharge re-
quirements identified in sections  4.3 and 9.3
of this appendix (for medium discharges) and
section 5.3 of this appendix (for worst case
discharges). The facility owner or operator
must plan for notification  and mobilization
of Tier 2 and 3  response  resources  as nec-
essary to meet the  requirements  for arrival
on-scene in  accordance with section  5,3 of
this appendix. An on-wat«T speed of 5 knots
arid a  land speed of 35  miles per hour is as-
sumed, unless the facility  owner or operator
can demonstrate otherwise.
  2.7  In identifying  equipment, the  facility
owner or operator shall list the storage loca-
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-05 Edition)

tiori, quantity, and manufacturer's make and
model. For oil recovery devices, the effective
daily recovery capacity, as determined using
section 6 of this appendix, must he included.
For boom, the overall boom height (draft and
freeboard) shall be included. A facility owner
or operator Is responsible for ensuring that
the identified boom has compatible connec-
tors.

3.0 Determining Response Resources  Required
  for  Small Discharges—Petroleum Oils and
  Non-Petmlrum Oilf Other Than Animal Fats
  and Vegetable Oils

  3.1  A  facility  owner  or  operator  shall
identify sufficient  response resources avail-
able, by contract or other approved means as
described In § 112.2, to respond to a small dis-
charge. A small discharge Is  defined as any
discharge volume less than or equal to 2,100
gallons, but not  to  exceed  the  calculated
worst case discharge. The equipment must be
designed to function  in the operating envi-
ronment at the point of expected use.
  3.2  Complexes that  are regulated by EPA
and the United States Coast Guard  (USCG)
must  also  consider planning quantities for
the transportation-related  transfer  portion
of the facility.
  3.2.1  Petroleum  oils.  The USCG planning
level that corresponds to EPA's "small dis-
charge" is termed "the average most prob-
able discharge."  A USCG rule found  at  33
CFR 154.1020 defines "the average  most prob-
able discharge" as the  lesser of 50 barrels
(2,100  gallons) or 1 percent  of the volume of
the worst rase discharge. Owners or opera-
tors of complexes that handle, store,  or
transport petroleum  oils must, compare oil
discharge volumes for a small discharge and
an average  most  probable discharge, and
plan for whichever quantity is greater.
  3.2.2 Non-petroleum  oils  other than animal
fats and vegetable oils. Owners or operators of
complexes  that handle, store,  or transport
non-petroleum oils other  than animal fats
and vegetable oils must  plan for  oil dis-
charge volumes for a small discharge. There
is no USCG planning level that, directly cor-
responds to EPA's 'small discharge." How-
ever,  the  USCG  (at 33 CFR  154.545)  has re-
quirements  to identify equipment to contain
oil resulting from an operational discharge.
  3.3  The response resources  sliall, as appro-
priate, include:
  3.3.!  One thousand  feet of  containment
boom (or. for complexes with marine transfer
components. 1.000 feet of containment boom
or two times the length of the largest vessel
that regularly conducts oil transfers  to  or
from the facility, whichever Is greater), and
a means of deploying It  within  1 hour of the
discovery of a discharge;
  3.3.2 Oil  recovery  devices  with an  effec-
tive daily  recovery  rapacityequal  to the
amount of  oil discharged  in a  small dis-
charge or greater which is available at the
                                           64

-------
Environmental Protection Agency

facility within 2 hours uf the detection of an
oil discharge: and
  3.3.3  Oil  storage capacity  for  recovered
oily material indicated In section 12.1 of this
appendix.

4.0  Determining Response Resources Required
  for  Medium Discharges— Petroleum Oik and
  Non-Petroleum Oils Other  Than Animal Fats
  and Vegetable Oils
  4.1  A facility  owner  or  operator shall
Identify sufficient response resources avail
able,  by contract or other approved means as
described in §112.2. to respond to  a medium
discharge of oil for that facility. This will  re-
quire  response resources  capable of  con-
taining and collecting up to 3B,1K)0 gallons of
oil or 10 percent of the worst case  discharge,
whichever is less. All equipment  identified
must he designed to operate in the  applicable
operating environment specified in Table 1 of
this appendix.
  4.2  Complexes that are regulated by EPA
and the USCG  must also consider planning
quantities  for  the  transportation-related
transfer portion of the facility.
  4.Z.I  Petroleum  oils. The USCG  planning
level  that  corresponds  to  KPA's "medium
discharge"  is termed "the maximum most
probable discharge." The USCG rule found at
33 CFR part 154 defines "the maximum most
probable discharge"  as  a discharge of 1,200
barrels (50,400  gallons) or  10 percent of the
worst rase discharge, whichever is less. Own-
ers  or operators of complexes that handle,
store, or transport petroleum oils must com-
pare calculated discharge volumes for a me-
dium discharge and a maximum most prob-
able discharge, and plan for whichever quan-
tity is greater.
  4,2.2  Non-petroleum  oils other  than  animal
fats and vegetable oils. Owners or operators of
complexes that handle, store, or transport
non-petroleum oils  other than animal fats
and  vegetable oils must  plan for oil dis
charge volumes ft>r a medium discharge. For
ijon*petroleum oils, there is no USCG plan-
ning level that directly corresponds to F.PA's
"medium discharge."
  4.3  Oil recovery devices identified to  meet
the  applicable medium discharge  volume
planning criteria  must be located such that
they are capable of arriving on scene within
fi hours in higher volume port areas and the
Great Lakes and within  12 hours in all other
areas. Higher volume port  areas and Great
Lakes areas are defined  In  section 1.1 of Ap-
pendix C to this part.
  4.4  Because  rapid control, containment..
and removal of oil are critical to reduce dis
charge  impact, the owner  or  operator must
determine response resources using an effec
live daily recovery capacity for oil recovery
devices equal to 50 percent of the planning
volume applicable for the  facility as deter-
mined in section 4.1 of this appendix.  The  ef-
fective  daily recovery capacity for oil recov
                           Pt.  112, App. E

ery devices identified in the plan must be de-
termined  using the criteria in section 6 of
this appendix.
  4.5  In addition to oil  recovery capacity,
the plan shall, as appropriate, identify suffi-
cient  quantity of containment boom avail-
able, by contract or other approved means as
described  in  §112.2, to  arrive within  the re-
quired response times  for oil collection and
containment and for protection of fish and
wildlife and sensitive environments.  E*'or fur-
ther description of fish and wildlife and sen-
sitive environments, see Appendices I, II, and
III  to  DOC/NOAA's "Guidance for Facility
and Vessel Response Plans: Fish and Wildlife
and Sensitive Environments"  (see Appendix
E to this part, section 13, for availability)
and the applicable ACP.  Although  40  CFR
part 112 does not set required  quantities of
boom for oil  collection  and containment, the
response plan shall identify and ensure,  by
contract  or  other approved means  as de-
scribed in  $112.2.  the availability  of the
quantity of boom Identified in the plan for
this purpose.
  4.6  The plan  must  Indicate  the avail-
ability of temporary  storage capacity  to
meet section 12.2 ul" this appendix. If avail
able storage  capacity is insufficient to  meet
this level, then the effective daily recovery'
capacity  must be  derated (downgraded)  to
the limits of the available storage capacity.
  4.7  The following is  an example of a me-
dium discharge volume planning calculation
for  equipment identification in a higher vol-
ume port area: The facility's largest above-
ground storage tank volume  is 840,000 gal-
lons. Ten percent of this capacity is 84,000
gallons. Because 10 percent  of  the facility's
largest tank,  or 84,000 gallons,  is greater
than 36,000 gallons, 36.000 gallons is used as
the planning volume. The effective daily re-
covery capacity is 50 percent of the planning
volume, or 18,000 gallons per day. The ability
of oil  recovery devices  to meet  this capacity
must  be calculated using the procedures in
section 6  of  tills appendix. Temporary  stor-
age capacity available on-scene must equal
twice  the dally  recovery capacity  as  indi-
cated  in  section 12.2  of  this  appendix,  or
36,000 gallons per day.  This is the informa-
tion the facility  owner or operator must use
to identify and ensure the availability of the
required response resources, by contract or
other approved means  as described  in §112.2.
The facility owner shall  also  identify how
much boom is available for use.

5.0  Determining Response  Resources Required
  for the Worst Case Discharge to the Maximum
  Extent Practicable

  5.1  A  facility  owner  or  operator  shall
identify  and ensure the  availability of,  by
                                           65

-------
Ft. 112, App. E

contract  or other  approved means  as de-
scribed  in  §112.2,  sufficient  response re-
sources  to  respond to the  worst: case dis-
charge of oil  to  the maximum extent prac-
ticable. Sections 7 and 10 of this appendix de-
scribe the  method to determine the  nec-
essary response  resources.  Worksheets are
provided as Attachments E-l and E-2 at the
end of this appendix to simplify the proce-
dures involved in  calculating  the planning
volume for  response resources for the worst
case discharge.
  5.1  A  facility  owner  or  operator  shall
identify  and ensure the  availability of, by
contract  or other  approved means  as de-
scribed  in  5H2.2.  sufficient  response re-
sources  to  respond to the  worst case dis-
charge of oil  to  the maximum extent prac-
ticable. Sections 7 and 10 of this appendix de-
scribe the  method to determine the  nec-
essary response  resources.  Worksheets are
provided as Attachments E-l and E-2 at the
end of this appendix to simplify the proce-
dures involved in  calculating  the planning
           40 CFR Ch. I  (7-1-05 Edition)

volume for response: resources for the worst
case discharge.
  5.2  Complexes chat are  regulated by  EPA
and  the  USCG muse also  consider planning
for the woist case discharge at the transpor-
tation-relaced  portion  of  the facility.  The
USCG requires that transportation-related
facility owners or  operators use  a different
calculation for the worst  case discharge In
the revisions to 33 CFR part 154. Owners or
operators of complex facilities that are regu-
lated by EPA  arid  the  USCG must compare
both calculations of worst  cast discharge de-
rived by  EPA  and  the USCG and plan for
whichever volume is greater.
  5.3  Oil discharge response resources iden-
tified In the response plan and available,  by
contract  or  other approved  means as de-
scribed in §112.2.  lo  meet the  applicable
worst case discharge planning volume must
be located such that they  are  capable of ar-
riving at the scene of a discharge within the
times specified for the applicable response
tier listed as follows





Tien
(in hours)
g
12
12

Tier 2
(in hours)
30
36
36

Tier 3
(in hours)
54
60
80

  The three levels of response tiers apply to
the amount of time in which facility owners
or  operators  must  plan for  response  re-
sources to arrive at the scene of a discharge
to respond to the worst case  discharge plan-
ning volume.  For example, at  a  worst  case
discharge in an  Inland  area, the first tier of
response resources (i.e.. that amount of on-
water and shoreline cleanup capacity  nec-
essary to respond to the fraction of the worst
case discharge as indicated  through the se-
ries of steps described In sections 7.2 and 7.3
or sections 10,2  and 10.3 of this  appendix)
would arrive  at  the scene of the discharge
within 12 hours:  the second tier of response
resources would  arrive within 36  hours:  and
the third tier  of res|jonse resources would ar-
rive within 60 hours,
  5.4  The  effective daily recovery capacity
for oil recovery devices identified iti the re-
sponse plan must  be determined  using  the
criteria in section 6 of this appendix. A facil-
ity owner or operator shall identify the stor-
age locations of all response resources used
for each tier.  The owner or operator of a fa-
cility whose required daily recovery capacity
exceeds  the applicable  contracting caps in
Table 5  of this appendix shall,   as  appro-
priate, identify  sources of additional equip-
ment, their location, and the arrangements
made to obtain  this equipment during a re-
sponse.  The owner or operator of a facility
whose  calculated planning volume exceeds
the applicable contracting caps in Table  5 of
Oils appendix shall, as appropriate. Identify
sources of  additional  equipment equal  to
twice the cap listed in  Tier 3 or the amount
necessary to reach  the calculated planning
volume, whichever  is lower. The resources
identified above the cap shall be capable of
arriving on-scene  not. later than the  Tier 3
response times in section  5.3 of this  appen-
dix.  No contract is required. While general
listings of available response equipment may
be used to  identify additional  sources  (i.e.,
"public" resources vs.  "private" resources),
the response plan shall  identify the specific
sources,  locations, and  quantities of equip-
ment that a facility owner  or  operator lias
considered in his or her planning. When list-
Ing USCG-classified oil spill removal organi-
zation(s) that have sufficient removal  capac-
ity to recover the volume above the response
capacity cap for the specific facility, as spec-
ified in Table 5 of  this appendix, it  Is not
necessary to list specific quantities of equip-
ment.
  5.5  A  facility  owner or  operator shall
identify the availability of temporary stor-
age capacity to meet section 12.2 of tills ap-
pendix. If available storage capacity is Insuf-
ficient, then the effective  daily recovery ca-
pacity must be derated  (downgraded)  to the
limits  of the available storage capacity.
  5.6  When selecting response resources nec-
essary to meet the  response  plan require-
ments, the facility owner  or operator shall,
as  appropriate, ensure that  a  portion  of
                                           66

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                           Pt.  112, App. E
those resources is capable of being used in
close-co-shore response activities in shallow
water. For any EPA-regulated facility that
is required to  plan for  response in shallow
water, at least 20 percent of the ori-water re-
sponse equipment identified for  the applica-
ble operating area shall, as appropriate,  he
capable of operating in water of 6 feet or less
depth.
  5.7  In addition  to  oil spill  recovery de-
vices, a facility owner or operator shall iden-
tify sufficient  quantities  of  hoorn  that are
available,  by  contract  or  cither  approved
means as described in §112.2, to arrive on-
scene within the specified  response  times for
oil containment and collection.  The specific
quantity of boom required for collection and
containment will depend on the  facility spe-
cific information and response strategies em
ployed. A facility owner or operator shall, as
appropriate,  also   identify sufficient quan-
tities of oil containment  boom to protect
fish and wildlife and sensitive environments.
For further description  of fish  and wildlife
and sensitive environments,  see Appendices
I.  II. and III to DOC/NOAA's "Guidance for
Facility and Vessel Response  Plans: Fish and
Wildlife and Sensitive  Environments" (see
Appendix E ta this part, section  13,  for av«til
ability), arid the  applicable  ACP.  Refer  to
this guidance document for  the number of
days and geographic areas (I.e., operating en-
vironments) specified  in Table 2 and Table 6
of this appendix.
  5.8  A facility owner or operator shall also
identify,  by  contract  or other  approved
means as described In § 112.2. the availability
of an oil spill removal organization^) (as de-
scribed in §112.2) capable of responding to a
shoreline cleanup  operation  involving  the
calculated  volume of oil and emulsified oil
thai, might  impact the affected shoreline.
The volume of oil that shall, as  appropriate.
be planned for is calculated through the ap-
plication of factors contained in Tables 'i.  3,
6,  and 7 of this  appendix. The  volume cal-
culated from these tables is intended t.ci as-
sist the facility owner or operator to identify
an nil  spill removal organization with suffi-
cient resources and expertise.

   g.O  Determining Effective Daily Kecovtry
       Capacity for Oil Recovery Devices
  6.1  Oil recovery devices identified by a fa
cility owner or operator must be identified
by  the manufacturer, model, and  effertive
daily  recovery capacity.  These capacities
must be used to determine whether there  is
sufficient capacity to meet  the applicable
planning criteria for a small discharge, a me-
dium discharge, and  a worst case discharge
to the  maximum extent practicable.
  6.2  To determine the effective daily recov
ery capacity of oil recovery devices, the for
mula listed in  section 6.2.1 of this  appendix
shall be used. This formula considers poten-
tial  limitations due to available  daylight,
weather,  sea   state,  and   percentage  of
emulsified oil in the recovered material. The
RA may assign a lower efficiency factor to
equipment listed in a response plan if it is
determined  that such  a reduction  is  war-
ranted.
  fi.2.1  The following formula shall  be used
to calculate  the effective dally recovery ca-
pacity:
R = T x 24 hours x E
where:
R—Effective daily recovery capacity;
T—Throughput  rate in barrels  per   hour
  (nameplate capacity); and
E—20 percent efficiency factor (or lower fac-
  tor as determined by the Regional Admin-
  istrator).

  6.2.2  For  those devices in  which the pump
limits the throughput of liquid, throughput
rate shall be calculated using the pump ca-
pacity.
  6.2.3  For   belt  or moptype  devices,  the
throughput rate shall be calculated using the
speed of the  belt or mop through the device.
assumed thickness of oil adhering to or col-
lected by the device, and surface area of the
belt  or mop.  For purposes of  this calculation,
the assumed thickness  of oil will be V4 inch.
  6.2.4  Facility owners or operators that in-
clude oil recovery devices whose throughput
is not measurable using a pump capacity or
belt/mop speed  may provide information to
support an  alternative method of  calcula
tion. This information  must be submitted
following the procedures in  section 6.3.2 of
this appendix.
  6.3  As an alternative to section 6.2 of this
appendix, a facility owner or operator may
submit adequate evidence that a different ef-
fective daily recovery capacity should he ap-
plied for a specific oil recovery device. Ade-
quate  evidence Is  actual verified perform-
ance data in discharge conditions or tests
using American Society of Testing and Mate-
rials (ASTM)  Standard F   631-99, F 808-83
(1999).  or an equivalent test approved by EPA
as deemed appropriate  (see  Appendix E  to
this  part, section 13, for general availability
of documents).
  6.3.1  The following formula must  he used
to calculate  the effective daily recovery ca-
pacity under this alternative:
R - D x U
where:
R—Effective daily recovery capacity.
D—Average  Oil  Recovery Rate in barrels pnr
  hour  (Item 26 In F 808-83;  Item 13.2.16 in F
  631-9(1; or actual performance data); and
U- Hours per day that, equipment can oper-
  ate under discharge conditions. Ten  hours
  per  day must, he  used unless a  facility
  owner or  operator can demonstrate that
  the recovery operation can be sustained for
  longer periods.
                                           67

-------
Pt. 112, App. E

  6.3.2  A facility owner or operator submit-
ting a response plan shall provide data that
supports the effective daily recovery capac-
ities for the oil recovery devices listed. The
following is aii  example*  of these  calcula-
tions:
  (1) A weir skimmer identified in a response
plan has a manufacturer's rated throughput
at the pump of 267 gallons per minute (gpm).
267 gpm=381 barrels per hour (bph)
R=381 bphx24 hr/dayx0.2=1.82S barrels per day
  (2) After testing using ASTM procedures,
the skimmer's  oil  recovery rate  is deter-
mined to be 220 gpm. The facility  owner or
operator identifies sufficient resources avail-
able to support operations for 12 hours per
day.
220gpm=314 bph
R=314 bphx!2 hr/day=3,76g barrels per day
  (3) The facility owner or operator will be
able to use the higher capacity if sufficient
temporary oil storage capacity is available.
Determination of alternative efficiency fac-
tors under section 6.2 of this appendix or the
acceptability of  an alternative  effective
daily recovery capacity under section 6.3 of
this appendix will he made by the Regional
Administrator as deemed appropriate.

7.0 Calculating Planning Volumes for a Worst
  Case Discharge—Petroleum Oils and Non-Pe-
  troleum Oils  Other Than Animal  Fats  and
  Vegetable Oils
  7.1  A facility owner or operator shall plan
for a response to the facility's worst case dis-
charge. The planning for on-water oil recov-
ery must take into account a loss of some oil
to the environment  due  to evaporative and
natural  dissipation, potential increases  in
volume due to emulsificatlon, and the poten-
tial  for  deposition  of oil on  the shoreline.
The procedures for non-petroleum oils other
than animal fats  and vegetable oili are dis-
cussed in section 7.7 of this appendix.
  7.2  The fallowing procedures must be used
by a facility owner  or  operator  in deter-
mining the  required on-water oil  recovery
capacity:
  7.2.1  The  following  must  be  determined:
the worst case discharge volume of oil in the
facility; the appropriate group(s)  for  the
types of oil  handled, stored, or transported
at the facility (persistent (Groups  2, 3, 4. 5)
or non-persistent (Group 1)1; and the facili-
ty's specific operating area. See sections 1.Z.3
and 1.2.8 of this appendix for the definitions
of non-persistent  and persistent oils, respec-
tively. Facilities that handle, store, or trans-
port oil from different oil groups must cal-
culate each group separately, unless the oil
group constitutes 10 percent or less by vol-
ume of the facility's total oil storage capac-
ity.  This  information is to  be used  with
Table  2 of this appendix to determine the
percentages  of the total volume to be used
           40 CFR Ch. I <7-l-05 Edition)

for removal  capacity planning. Table 2 of
this  appendix divides the volume Into three
categories: oil lost  to the environment: oil
deposited on the shoreline; and oil available
for on-water recovery.
  7.2.2 The  art-water oil recovery  volume
shall, as appropriate,  be adjusted  using the
appropriate emulsificatfon factor found in
Table 3 of this appendix. Facilities that han-
dle, store, or transport oil from different pe-
troleum  groups must compare the  on water
recovery volume for each oil group  (unless
the oil group constitutes  10  percent  or  less
by volume of the facility's total storage ca-
pacity) and use the calculation that  results
in the largest on-water  oil recovery volume
to plan for the amount of response resources
for a worst case discharge.
  7.2.3 The adjusted volume Is multiplied by
the on-water oil recovery  resource mobiliza-
tion factor found iti Table 4 of this appendix
from the appropriate operating area and re-
sponse tier to determine the total  on-water
oil recovery capacity in  barrels per day that
must be identified  or contracted  to arrive
tin-scene within the applicable time for each
response tier. Three tiers are specified.  For
higher volume  port areas,  the contracted
tiers of resources must he located such that
they are capable of arriving on-scene within
6 hours for Tier 1. 30 hours for Tier 2, and 54
hours for Tier 3 of the discovery of an oil dis-
charge. For all other rivers  and canals, in-
land, nearshore areas, and the Great Lakes.
these tiers are 12, 36, and 60 hours.
  7,2.4 The resulting tin-water oil recovery
capacity In barrels per  day for each tier is
used to identify response resources necessary
to sustain operations ill the applicable oper-
ating area. The  equipment shall be capable
of sustaining operations for the time period
specified in Table 2 tif this appendix. The fa-
cility owner or  operator  shall identify  and
ensure the availability, by contract or other
approved means as described in §112.2, of suf-
ficient oil spill recovery devices to provide
the effective daily oil recovery capacity re-
quired. If the required capacity exceeds the
applicable cap specified In Table 5 of this ap-
pendix, then  a  facility  owner or  operator
shall ensure,  by contract  or  other  approved
means as described in  5112.2. only for the
quantity  of resources requited to meet the
cap. but shall identify sources of additional
resources as indicated in  section 5.4 of this
appendix. The owner or operator of a facility
whose planning volume  exceeded the cap in
1993  must make arrangements  to  identify
and  ensure  the availability,  by contract or
other approved  means as described  in 5112.2.
for additional capacity to be under contract
by 1998 or 2003. as appropriate. For a facility
that handles  multiple groups of oil,  the re-
quired effective  daily recovery capacity for
each oil  group is calculated before applying
the cap.  The oil group calculation  resulting
in the  largest  on water recovery  volume
                                           68

-------
Environmental Protection Agency

must be used to plan for the amount  of re-
sponse resources for  a worst case discharge,
unless the oil group  comprises  10 percent or
less by volume of the facility's total oil stor-
age capacity.
  7.3  The procedures discussed In sections
7.3.1-7.3.3 of this appendix  must be  used to
calculate the  planning  volume for  identi-
fying shoreline cleanup capacity (for Group 1
through Group 4 oils).
  7.3.1  The following must  be determined:
the worst case discharge volume  of oil for
the facility; the appropriate group(s) fur the
types of oil handled, stored, or transported
at the facility [persistent (Groups 2, 3. or 4)
or  non-persistent (Group 1)1; and the geo-
graphic area(s) in which the facility operates
(i.e.,  operating areas).  For a  facility  han-
dling, storing, or transporting  oil from  dif-
ferent groups, each group must  be calculated
separately. Using this information,  Table 2
of this appendix must be used  to determine
the percentages of  the  total volume  io be
used for shoreline cleanup resource planning.
  7.3.2  The shoreline cleanup planning  vol-
ume must be adjusted to reflect an emulsi-
ficatlon factor using the same  procedure as
described in section 7.2.2 of this appendix.
  7.3.3  The resulting volume shall  b«; vised
to identify an oil spill removal organisation
with the appropriate shoreline cleanup capa-
bility.
  7.4  A  response  plan  must  identify  re-
sponse  resources with  fire  fighting  capa-
bility. The owner or operator  of  a  facility
that  handles, stores, or  transports Group 1
through Group 4 oils that does not have ade-
quate fire fighting resources located at the
facility  or that cannot rely  on  sufficient
local fire fighting resources must  identify
adequate fire fighting resources. The facility
owner or operator shall ensure, by contract
or  other approved  means  as  described in
§112.2,  the availability of  these  resources.
The response plan must also identify an indi-
vidual located at the facility to work with
the  fire  department for Group 1  through
Group 4 oil fires. This individual  shall also
verify that sufficient well-trained  fire fight-
ing resources are available within a reason-
able response time to a worst case scenario.
The individual may he  the qualified  indi-
vidual identified in the  response plan or an-
other  appropriate individual located at  the
facility.
  7.5  The following is an example of the  pro-
cedure described above in sections  7.2 and 7.3
of this appendix: A facility with a 270.000  bar-
rel (11.3 million gallons) capacity for  #6 oil
(specific gravity 0.96) is  located in a higher
volume port area. The facility is an a penin-
sula and has docks  on  both the ocean  and
bay sides. The facility has  four aboveground
oil storage tanks with a combined total ca-
pacity of 80,000 barrels (3.36 million  gallons)
and no secondary containment. The  remain-
ing facility tanks are inside secondary con-
                           Pt.  112, App. E

talnment  structures.  The  largest  above-
ground oil storage tank (90,000 barrels or 3.78
million gallons) has  its own secondary con-
tainment. Two 50,000 barrel  (2.1 million gal-
lon)  tanks (chat  are not connected  by  a
manifold)  are within a common secondary
containment tank area, which  is capable of
holding  100,000 barrels (4.2 million  gallons)
plus sufficient freeboard.
  7.5.1   The worst case discharge for the fa-
i-ility is calculated hy adding the capacity of
all  aboveground  oil  storage  tanks  without
secondary containment  (80,000  barrels) plus
the capacity of the largest ahoveground oil
storage tank inside secondary  containment.
The resulting worst case discharge volume is
170,000 barrels or 7.14 million gallons.
  7.5.2   Because the requirements for Tiers 1,
2. and 3 for inland  and nearshore exceed the
raps identified in Table 5 of this appendix,
the facility  owner  will contract  for  a re-
sponse to in,000 barrels per day  (bpd) for Tier
1, 20,000 bpd for Tier 2, and 40,000 bpd for Tier
3. Resources for the  remaining 7,850 hpd for
Tier 1, 9.750 bpd for Tier 2. and 7,600 bpd for
Tier 3 shall be identified but need not be con-
tracted for in advance. The facility  owner or
operator shall, as appropriate,  also identify
or contract for quantities  of boom identified
in their response plan for the  protection of
fish and wildlife and sensitive environments
within  the area  potentially  impacted by a
worst case discharge from the facility.  For
further description of fish and wildlife  and
sensitive  environments, see Appendices I, 11,
and 111  to DOC/NOAA's "Guidance for Facil-
ity and Vessel Response Plans:  Fish  and
Wildlife arid Sensitive Environments."  (see
Appendix E to this part, section 13, for avail-
ability) and the applicable ACP. Attachment
C-1II to Appendix  C provides a method for
calculating a planning distance to fish  and
wildlife arid sensitive environments and pub-
lic drinking water Intakes that may he im-
pacted in the event of a worst case discharge.
  7.6  The procedures discussed in  sections
7.8.1-7.6.3 of  this appendix must tie used to
determine appropriate response resources for
facilities with Group 5 oils.
  7.6.1   The owner or operator of a facility
that handles, stores, or transports  Group 5
oils shall, as appropriate, Identify the re-
sponse  resources  available  hy contract or
other approved means, as  described  in SI 12.2.
The equipment Identified  in a response plan
shall, as appropriate, include:
  (1) Sonar,  sampling equipment,  or  other
methods for locating the  oil on the bottom
or suspended in the water column;
  (2) Containment  boom,  sorhent boom, silt
curtains,  or other methods  for  containing
the oil that may remain floating on the sur-
face or to reduce spreading on the bottom;
  (3) Dredges,  pumps, or other  equipment
necessary to recover oil from the bottom and
shoreline;
                                           69

-------
Pt. 112, App. E

  (4) Equipment necessary to assess the im-
pact of such discharges: and
  (5) Other appropriate equipment necessary
to respond t.o a discharge involving the type
of oil handled, stored,, or transported,
  7.6,2  Response resources Identified In a re-
sponse  plan  for  a  Facility that  handles,
stores, or transports Group 5 oils under sec-
tion 7.6.1 of this appendix shall  be capable of
being deployed (on  site) within 24  hours of
discovery of a discharge to the area where
the facility Is operating.
  7.6.3  A response  plan must identify re-
sponse  resources  with  fire  fighting  capa-
bility. The  owner or operator  of a facility
that handles, stores, or transports Group 5
oils that does not have adequate fire fighting
resources located at the facility or that can-
not rely on sufficient local  fire fighting re-
sources must identify adequate fire fighting
resources.  The  facility owner or  operator
shall ensure,  by contract or other approved
means as described In § 112.2, the availability
of these resources.  The response plan  shall
also identify an individual located at the fa-
cility to work with the fire department for
Croup 5 oil fires.  This individual shall also
verify that sufficient well-trained fire  fight-
ing resources are available within a reason-
able response time to respond to a worst case
discharge.  The individual may  he the quali-
fied individual  identified  In the  response
plan  or  another appropriate Individual lo-
cated at the facility.
  7.7  Nan petroleum  nils atJiw than  animal
fats and  vegetable  wl'/s.  The  procedures de-
scribed 111 sections 7.7.1  through 7.7.5 of this
appendix must be used  to determine appro-
priate response pliin development and  eval-
uation  criteria for  facilities  that  handle,
store, or transport, nori-petroleum oils other
than animal fats and vegetable  oils. Refer to
section 11  of this appendix for information
on  the limitations  on the use of  chemical
agents for Inland and nearshore areas.
  7.7.1  An owner or  operator  of a facility
that handles, stores, or transports non-petro-
leum oils other than animal fats and vege-
table oils must provide information In his or
her plan that identifies:
  (1) Procedures and strategies for respond-
ing to a worst case discharge to the  max-
imum extent practicable; and
  (2) Sources of the equipment and supplies
necessary  to locate,  recover, and  mitigate
such a discharge.
  7.7.2  An owner or  operator  of a facility
that handles, stores, or transports non-petro-
leum oils other than animal fats arid vege-
table oils must ensure  that  any equipment
identified in a response plan is capable of op-
erating in the conditions expected in the ge-
ographic  area(s)  (i.e.,  operating  environ-
ments)  In which the facility operates using
the criteria in Table 1 of this appendix. When
evaluating the operability of equipment, the
facility owner or operator must consider lim-
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-05 Edition)

itations  that are  Identified in the  appro-
priate ACPs. including!
  (1) Ice conditions;
  (2) Dubris:
  (3) Temperature ranges; and
  (4) Weather-related visibility.
  7.7.3 The owner or operator of a facility
(hat handles, stores, or transports non-petro-
leum oils other than animal fats  and vege-
table oils  must  Identify the  response re-
sources that  are  available  by contract  or
cither approved means, as described in $112.2.
The equipment described  In  the  response
plan shall,  as appropriate, include:
  (1) Containment boom,  sorbent  boom,  or
other methods for containing oil floating on
the surface or to protect shorelines from im-
pact;
  (2) Oil recovery devices appropriate for the
type of non-petroleum oil carried; and
  (3) Other appropriate equipment  necessary
to respond to a discharge Involving the type
of oil carried.
  7.7.4 Response resources Identified In a re-
sponse plan according to section 7.7.3 of this
appendix must be  capable of commencing an
effective on scene response within  the  appli-
cable tier  response times In  section  5.3  of
this appendix.
  7.7.5 A  response  plan must identify re-
sponse resources  with  fire fighting  capa-
bility. The owner or operator of  a facility
that handles, stores, or transports non-petro-
leum oils other than animal fats  and vege-
table oils  that  docs not  have adequate fire
fighting resources located at the facility or
that  cannot  rely on sufficient  local fire
fighting  resources  must  identify  adequate
fire  fighting resourc-es. The owner or oper-
ator shall  ensure, by contract or other ap-
proved means as  described  In §112.2,  Un-
availability of these resourc-es. The response
plan must also identify an Individual located
at the facility to  work with the fire depart-
ment for fires of  these oils. This  individual
shall also verify that sufficient well-trained
fire fighting resources are available within a
reasonable response time to a worst case sce-
nario. The  individual may he  the qualified
Individual  identified in the response plan or
another  appropriate  individual located  at
the facility.

8.0 Determining Response Resources Required
  for Small Discharges—Animal Fats and Vege-
  table Oils
  8.1  A  facility  owner  or operator   shall
identify sufficient response  resources  avail-
able, by contract or other approved means as
described in § 112.2, to respond to a small dis-
charge of  animal fats or vegetable oils.  A
small discliarge is defined as  any discharge
volume less than or  equal to  2,100 gallons,
hut not to exceed the calculated worst case
discharge.  The equipment must be designed
to function in the operating environment at
the point of expected use.
                                           70

-------
Environmental Protection Agency

  8.2  Complexes that are regulated by  EPA
and the  USCG must also consider planning
quantities for the marine transportation-re-
lated portion of the facility.
  8.2.1  The USCG planning level  that  cor-
responds  to  EPA's  "small  discharge"  is
termed  "the  average  most  probable  dis-
charge."  A USCG  rule  found  at  33  CFR
154.1020 defines  "the average most  probable
discharge" as the lesser  of  50 barrels (2.100
gallons)  or 1  percent of  the volume  of the
worst case discharge. Owners or operators of
complexes that handle, store, or  transport
animal fats and vegetable oils must compare
oil discharge volumes for a  small  discharge
and an average most probable discharge, and
plan for whichever quantity is greater.
  8.3  The response resources shall, as appro-
priate, Include:
  8.3.1  One thousand  feet  of containment
boom (or, for complexes with marine transfer
components, 1.000 feet of containment boom
or two times the length of the largest vessel
that regularly conducts  oil transfers to  or
from the facility,  whichever is greater), and
a means of deploying it within 1 hour of the
discovery of a discharge;
  8.3.2  Oil  recovery devices  with an effec-
tive  daily recovery  capacity equal to  the
amount  of oil  discharged in a  small  dis-
charge or greater which  is available  at the
facility within 2 hours of the detection of a
discharge; and
  8.3.3  Oil  storage  capacity  for  recovered
oily material indicated in section 12.2 of this
appendix.

9.0  Determining Response Resources Required
  for  Medium  Dischargrs-Animal  Fats  and
  Vegetable Oils
  9.1  A   facility  owner  or  operator shall
identify  sufficient response  resources avail-
able, by contract or other approved means as
described in §112.2, to respond to a medium
discharge of animal  fats or vegetable oils for
that facility.  This will require response re-
sources capable of containing and collecting
up to 36,000 gallons of oil  or 10 percent of the
worst   case discharge, whichever is less. All
equipment identified must be designed to op-
erate   in  the  applicable  operating  environ-
ment specified In Table 1 of this appendix.
  9.2  Complexes that arc regulated by  KPA
and the  USCG must also consider planning
quantities  for  the  transportation-related
transfer  portion of the facility.  Owners  or
operators of complexes that handle, store, or
transport animal fats or vegetable oils must
plan for  oil discharge volumes for a medium
discharge. For non-petroleum oils, there is
no USCG planning  level that directly  cor-
responds to EPA's "medium discharge." Al-
though the USCG  does not have planning re-
quirements for  medium discharges, they  rio
have  requirements  (at.  33 CFR  154.545)  to
identify  equipment  to  contain oil resulting
from an operational discharge.
                           Pt. 112. App. E

  9.3  Oil recovery devices identified to meet
the  applicable  medium  discharge  volume
planning criteria must be located such that
they are capable of arriving on-scene within
6 hours in higher volume port areas and the
Great Lakes and within 12 hours in all  other
areas.  Higher volume port areas and Great
Lakes  areas are defined in section 1.1 of Ap-
pendix C to this part.
  9.4  Because  rapid control, containment.
and removal of oil are critical to reduce dis-
charge impact,  the owner or operator must
determine response resources using an  effec-
tive  daily recovery capacity for oil recovery
devices equal to 50  percent of the planning
volume applicable for the facility as deter-
mined  in section 9.1  of this appendix. The ef-
fective daily recovery capacity for oil recov-
ery devices identified in the plan must be de-
termined using the  criteria  in section 6 of
this  appendix.
  9.5  In addition to oil  recovery capacity.
the plan shall,  as appropriate, identify suffi-
cient quantity of containment boom avail-
able, by contract or other approved means as
described in §112.2, to arrive within the re-
quired response times for oil collection  and
containment and for protection of fish and
wildlife and sensitive environments. For fur-
ther description of fish and wildlife and sen-
sitive environments, see Appendices I, II, and
111 to  DOC/NOAA's  "Guidance for  Facility
and Vessel Response Plans: Fish and Wildlife
and Sensitive Environments" (59 FR 14713-22.
March 29, 1994)  and  the applicable ACP. Al-
though 40 CFR part 112 does not set required
quantities of boom for oil collection arid con-
tainment, the  response plan  shall Identify
and  ensure, by contract  or other approved
means as described In §112,2, the availability
of the quantity of  boom  identified tri the
plan for this purpose.
  9.6  The  plan  must  indicate  the  avail
ability  of  temporary storage capacity to
meet section 12.2 of this appendix.  If avail-
able storage capacity is insufficient to meet
this  level, then the  effective daily recovery
capacity must  be derated (downgraded) to
the limits of the available  storage capacity.
  9.7  The following is an example of a me-
dium discharge volume planning calculation
for equipment identification in a higher vol-
ume port area:
  The facility's largest abovegrouiid storage
tank volume is 841).WO gallons. Ten percent
of this capacity is 84.000 gallons. Because 10
percent of  the facility's  largest tank, or
84.000 gallons, is greater than 36,000 gallons,
36.000 gallons is used as the planning volume.
The  effective daily  recovery capacity  is 50
percent of the planning volume, or IB.000 gal-
lons  per day. The ability of oil recovery de-
vices to meet  this capacity must  be cal-
culated using the procedures in  section 6 of
this  appendix.  Temporary  storage capacity
available  on-scene  must  equal  twice  the
                                           71

-------
Pt. 112, App. E

daily recovery rapacity as indicated in sec-
tion 12.2 of this appendix, or :(6.000 gallons
per day. This  is tlie information die facility
owner or operator  must use to identify and
ensure  the  availability of the required re-
sponse  resources, by contract  or  other  ap-
proved  means as described In § 112.2. The fa-
cility owner shall  also identify how much
hoom is available for use.

10.0 Calculating Planning Volumes for a Worst
  Case Discharge—Animal Fats and  Vegetable
  Oils.
  10.1  A  facility owner  or  operator shall
plan for a response to the facility's  worst
case discharge. The planning for on-water till
recovery must take into  account a  loss of
some oil to the environment due to physical.
chemical, and biological processes, potential
increases In volume due  to eniulsificatiori,
and the potential for deposition of oil on the
shoreline or  on  sediments. The  response
planning procedures, for animal fats and veg-
etable oils  are  discussed  in  section 10,7  of
this appendix.  You may  use alternate re-
sponse  planning procedures for animal fats
and vegetable oils  if those procedures result
in  environmental  protection equivalent  1:0
that provided by the  procedures in section
10.7 of this appendix.
  10.2  The  following   procedures  must  tie
used by a facility owner or operator In deter-
mining the required on-water  oil  recovery
capacity:
  10.2.1   The following must be determined:
the worst case discharge volume of oil in the
facility; the  appropriate   group(s)  for  the
types of oil handled, stored, or transported
at the facility (Groups A, B, C); and the fa-
cility's -specific  operating  area. See sections
1.2.1 and 1.2.9  of this appendix for the defini-
tions of animal fats and  vegetable oils and
groups  thereof.  Facilities that handle, store,
or  transport  oil from different  oil  groups
must calculate each group separately, unless
the oil group constitutes  10 percent or less
by volume of the facility's total till storage
capacity. This information is to be used with
Table  B of  this  appendix  to determine  the
percentages of the total volume to  be used
for removal capacity  planning. Table 6  (if
this appendix divides the  volume into three
categories: oil lost  to  the environment; oil
deposited on the shoreline; and oil available
for on-water recovery.
  10.2.2  The on-water  oil  recovery volume
shall, as appropriate,  he adjusted  using the
appropriate emulsification factor found  in
Table 7 of this appendix. Facilities that han-
dle, store,  or transport oil  from  different
groups  must compare  the  on-water recovery
volume  for each oil group (unless the oil
group constitutes 10 percent or less by vol-
ume of the  facility's total storage capacity)
and use the calculation that results in the
largest on-water oil recovery volume to plan
           40 CFR Ch. I  (7-1-05 Edition)

for (he amount of response resources for a
worst case discharge.
  10.2.3 The adjusted volume is multiplied
by the on-water oil recovery resource mobili-
zation factor found  in Table 4 of this appen-
dix from the appropriate operating area and
response tier to determine  the total ori-water
oil recovery capacity In barrels per day that
must  he identified  or  contracted to arrive
on-scene within the applicable time for each
response tier. Three i iers  are specified. For
higher  volume  port areas, the  contracted
tiers of resources must be located such that
they are capable of arriving on-scene within
6 hours for Tier 1, 30 hours for Tier 2, and 54
hours  for Tier 3 of the discovery  of a dis-
charge. For all other rivers and canals, in-
land,  nearshore areas, and the Great  Lakes,
these tiers are 12, 36, arid GO hours.
  10.2.4 The resulting on-water  oil recovery
capacity in barrels  per  day for  each tier  is
used to identify response resources necessary
to sustain operations in the applicable oper-
ating area.  The equipment shall be capable
of sustaining operations for the  time period
specified in  Table 6  of this appendix. The fa-
cility  owner or operator  shall identify and
ensure, by contract or other approved means
as described in §112.2. the availability of suf-
ficient oil spill recovery devices to provide
the effective daily oil recovery capacity re-
quired. If the required capacity  exceeds the
applicable rap specified in  Table  5 of this ap.
pendix, thc-n  a facility owner  or  operator
shall  ensure, by contract  or other  approved
means as described  in  §112.2, only for the
quantity of resourci-s required to meet the
cap, but shall identify sources of additional
resources as indicated  in  section 5.4  of this
appendix. The owner or operator of a facility
whose planning volume exceeded the cap in
1998 must make  arrangements  to identify
and ensure, by contract or other  approved
means as described in § 112.2, the availability
of additional capacity  tn  be under contract
by  2003,  as  appropriate. For a facility that
handles multiple groups of oil, the required
effective dally recovery capacity for each oil
group  is calculated  before applying the cap.
The oil group calculation resulting  in the
largest on-water recovery volume must  be
used to plan for the amount of  response re-
sources for a worst case discharge, unless the
oil group comprises  10 percent or less by vol-
ume of the facility's oil storage capacity.
  10.3  The  procedures  discussed  in sections
10.3.1  through 10.3.3  of this appendix must be
used  to  calculate the  planning volume for
identifying  shoreline  cleanup capacity (for
Groups A and B oils).
  10.3.1 Thi: following must  IK;  determined:
the worst case discharge  volume of oil for
the facility; the appropriate group(s)  for the
types of oil handled, stored, or transported
at the facility  (Groups A or B); and the geo-
graphic area(s) in which the facility operates
                                           72

-------
Environmental Protection Agency

(i.e., operating areas).  For a  facility  han-
dling, storing, or transporting oil from dif-
ferent groups, each group must he calculated
separately.  Using this information,  Table 6
of this appendix must be  used to determine
the percentages of  the  total volume to be
used for shoreline cleanup resource planning.
  10.3.2  The shoreline cleanup planning vol-
ume must be adjusted to  reflect an emulsi-
fication factor using the same procedure as
described  in section  10.2.2 of this appendix.
  10.3.3  The resulting volume  shall  he used
to identify an oil spill removal organization
with the- appropriate shoreline cleanup capa-
bility.
  10.4  A  response  plan must  identify re-
sponse resources with fire fighting capability
appropriate for  the risk  of fire and explosion
at the  facility from  the discharge or threat
of discharge of oil. The  owner or operator of
a facility that handles,  stores,  or transports
Group  A  or  B oils that does not have ade-
quate fire fighting resources located at the
facility or  that cannot rely  on  sufficient
local  fire fighting resources  must  Identify
adequate  fire fighting resources. The facility
owner or  operator shall ensure, hy contract
or  other  approved  means as  described in
5112,2.  the  availability  of these resources.
The response plan must  also identify an indi-
vidual  to  work  with  the fire department for
Croup A or B oil fires. This individual  shall
also verify  that sufficient well-trained fire
fighting resources are available within a rea-
sonable response time to a worst case sce-
nario. The  individual may he  the qualified
individual identified in  the response plan or
another  appropriate  individual  located  al.
the facility.
  10.5  The  following is an example of the
procedure described in sections 10,2  and 10.3
of this appendix. A facility with a 37.04 mil-
lion gallon (881,904 barrel) capacity of several
types of vegetable oils  is  located in the In-
                           Pt.  112, App. E

land Operating Area. The vegetable oil with
the highest specific gravity stored at the fa-
cility is soybean  oil (specific gravity 0.922.
Group B vegetable oil).  The facility has ten
aboveground oil storage tanks with a com-
bined total capacity of 18 million gallons
(428.571  barrels) and without  secondary con-
tainment.  The remaining facility tanks are
inside  secondary  containment  structures.
The largest aboveground oil storage tank (3
million  gallons or 71,428 barrels) has its own
secondary  containment. Two  2.1 million gal-
lon (50,000  barrel)  tanks (that  are not con-
nected by  a manifold) are within a common
secondary  containment  tank area, which is
capable of  holding 4.2 million gallons (100.000
barrels) plus sufficient freeboard.
  10.5.1  The worst case  discharge for the fa-
cility is calculated by adding the capacity of
all aboveground vegetable oil storage tanks
without secondary containment (18.0 million
gallons)  plus  the  capacity  of the  largest
ahoveground storage tank  Inside  secondary
containment  (3.0  million gallons).  The  re-
sulting  worst  case discharge is 21 million
gallons or  500,000 barrels.
  10.5.2  With  a specific  worst case discharge
Identified,  the planning  volume for on-water
recovery can be identified as follows:
Worst case discharge:  21  million gallons
  (500,000 barrels) of Group B vegetable oil
Operating Area: Inland
Planned percent recovered floating vegetable
  oil (from Table 15, column Nearshore/InlandV
  Great Lakes): Inland. Group B is 20%
Kmulsion factor (from Table 7): 2.0
Planning   volumes  for  on-water   recovery:
  21,000,000 gallons x 0.2  x 2.0  =  8,400,000 gal-
  lons or 200,000 barrels.
Determine required  resources  for  on-water
  recovery for each of the  three tiers using
  mobilization factors (from Table 4, column
  Inland/Nearshore/Great Lakes)
Inland Operating Area

Estimated Daily Recovery Capacity (bbls) 	 ..„„..,„„..„,.., 	

Tiert
15
30000

Tier 2
25
50,000

Tiers
40
80,000

  10.5.3  Because the  requirements  for  On-
Water Recovery Resources for Tiers  1. 2, and
3 for  Inland Operating Area exceed the caps
identified in Table 5 of this appendix, the fa-
cility owner  will contract for a response of
12.500 barrels per day  (hpd) for Tier  1. 25,000
bpd for  Tier 2. and 50.001) bpd for Tier 3. Re-
sources for the remaining 17.500 hpd  for Tier
1, 25,000 bpd for Tier 2, and 30,000 bpd for Tier
3 shall  be Identified  hut need  not  be  con-
tracted  for in advance.
  10.5.4  With the  specific worst (rase  dis-
charge Identified, the planning volume of on-
shore recovery can IK identified as follows:
Worst  case  discharge:  21  million  gallons
  (51X1,000 barrels) of Group B vegetable oil
Operating Area: Inland
Planned percent recovered floating vegetable
  oil from onshore (from  Table 6,  column
  Nearshore/lnland/Great   Lakes):    Inland,
  Group B is 65%
Emulsion factor (from Table 7): 2.0
Planning volumes for shoreline recovery:
21,000,000 gallons x 0.65 x 2.0 = 27.300,000 gal-
  lons or 650,000 barrels
  10.5.5  The facility owner or operator shall.
as appropriate, also Identify or contract for
quantities of boom identified in the response
plan for  the protection of fish and  wildlife
                                           73

-------
Pt. 112, App. E

and sensitive environments wlt.hin the area
potentially Impacted  by a warst case dis-
charge from the facility. For further descrip-
tion of fish arid wildlife and sensitive envi-
ronments,  see Appendices  I. II,  and 111  to
DOC/NOAA's "Guidance lor Facility and Ves-
sel Response Plans:  Fish  and  Wildlife and
Sensitive Environments." (see Appendix E to
this part, section 13, for availability) and the
applicable  ACP. Attachment C-III to Appen-
dix C  provides a  method  for calculating a
planning distance  to  fish  and wildlife and
sensitive environments and public drinking
water intakes that  may be adversely affected
in the event of a worst case discharge.
  10.6  The procedures discussed  in sections
10.6.1 through 10.6.3 of this  appendix must he
used to determine appropriate response  re-
sources for facilities with Group C oils.
  10.6.1  The owner or operator of a facility
that handles, stores, or transports Group C
oils shall,  as appropriate,  identify the  re-
sponse  resources  available by contract  or
other approved means, as described in Si 12.2.
The equipment identified In a response plan
shall, as appropriate, include:
  (1) Sonar,  sampling  equipment,  or other
methods for locating the oil on the bottom
or suspended in the water column:
  (2) Containment  boom, sorbent boom, silt
curtains, or other methods for  containing
the oil that may remain floating  on the sur-
face or to reduce spreading  on the bottom;
  (3) Dredges, pumps,  or  other  equipment
necessary to recover oil from the bottom and
shoreline;
  (4) Equipment necessary  to assess the im-
pact of such discharges; and
  (5) Other appropriate equipment necessary
to respond to a discliarge Involving the tyi>e
of oil handled, stored, or transported.
  10.6.2  Response  resources Identified  in a
response plan for  a facility  that handles.
stores, or transports Group C oils under sec-
tion 10.6.1 of this appendix shall be capable of
being deployed on  scene within  24 hours of
discovery of a discharge.
  10.6.3  A  response plan  must  Identify  re-
sponse  resources   with  fire fighting  capa-
bility. The owner  or  operator of a facility
that handles, stores, or transports Group C
oils that does not have adequate fire fighting
resources located at. the facility or that can-
not rely on sufficient local fire fighting  re-
sources must identify adequate fire fighting
resources.  The owner or operator shall en-
sure, by contract or other approved means as
described in §112.2. the availability of these
resources.  The response plan shall also iden-
tify an Individual  located  at the facility to
work  with the fire department for Group C
oil fires. This individual  shall  also verify
that sufficient well trained fire fighting  re-
sources are available within a reasonable  re
sponse time to respond  to  a worst case dis-
charge. The  individual may be the qualified
individual  identified in the response plan or
           40 CFR Ch. I  (7-1-05 Edition)

another  appropriate individual  located  at
the facility.
  10.7  The procedures  described  in sections
10.7.1 through 10.7.5 of this appendix must be
used to determine appropriate response plan
development and evaluation criteria  for fa-
cilities that handle, store, or transport ani-
mal fats and vegetable oils. Refer to section
11 of this appendix for information on the
limitations on the use of chemical agents for
Inland and nearshore areas.
  10.7.1   An  owner  or  operator of a facility
that  handles, stores,  or  transports animal
fats and vegetable oils must provide  Infor-
mation in the response plan that identifies:
  (1)  Procedures and strategitrs far respond-
ing to a worst  case  discharge of animal fats
and vegetable  oils to the maximum  extent
practicable: and
  (2)  Sources of the equipment and supplies
necessary to  locate, recover,  and  mitigate
such a discharge.
  10.7.2  An  owner  or  operator of a facility
that  handles, stores,  or  transports animal
fats and  vegetable oils must ensure that any
equipment identified in a response plan Is ca-
pable of operating  in the  geographic area(s)
(i.e.. operating environments) in which the
facility operates vising the criteria in Table 1
tif this appendix. When evaluating the oper-
ability of equipment,  the facility owner or
operator must  consider  limitations that are
identified In the appropriate ACPs, includ-
ing:
  (1) Ice conditions;
  (2) Debris;
  (3) Temperature ranges; and
  (4) Weather-related visibility,
  10.7 3.  The owner or operator of a facility
tliat  handles,  stores,  or  transports animal
fats and vegetable oils must identify the re-
sponse reso'-irces that are available by con-
tract or other  approved means, as described
in 5112.2. The equipment described in the re-
sponse plan shall, as appropriate, include:
  (1)  Containment  boom,  scirhent boom,  or
other methods for containing oil  floating on
the surface or to protect shorelines from Im-
pact;
  (2) Oil  recovery devices appropriate for the
type of animal fat or vegetable oil carried;
and
  (3) Other appropriate equipment necessary
to respond to a discharge  involving the type
of oil carried.
  10.7.4  Response resources identified  in a
response plan according to  section 10.7.3 of
this  appendix must  he  capable  of com-
mencing an effective on scene response with-
in the applicable tier  response  times  in sec
t Ion 5.3 of this appendix.
  10.7.5  A response plan  must identify re-
sponse  resources wir.h  fire  fighting  capa-
bility. The  owner or  operator of a facility
that  handles,  stores,  or  transports animal
fats and vegetable  oils that does not  have
adequate fire fighting resources  located at
                                           74

-------
Environmental Protection Agency

the facility or that, cannot rely on sufficient
local fire  fighting resources must identify
adequate fire fighting resources.  The owner
or  operator shall ensure, hy  corn ract  or
other approved means as described in §112.2,
the availability  of these resources. The re
spouse plan shall also identify an individual
located at  the facility to work with the fire
department for animal fat and vegetable oil
fires. This individual shall also verify thai
sufficient well-trained fire lighting resources
are available within a  reasonable response
time  to respond to a worst case discharge.
The individual  may be  the  qualified indi-
vidual identified in the response plan or an
other appropriate individual  located  at the
facility.

      11.0   Determining the A variability of
        Alternative Ki-sponse Methods

  11.1  For chemical agents  to  be identified
in a response plan, they must be on the NCP
Product Schedule that  is  maintained   hy
EPA. (Some States have a list of approved
dispersants for use within Slate waters. Nor
all of these State-approved dispersants are
listed on the NCP Product Schedule.)
  11.2  Identification of chemical  agents  in
the plan does not imply that their use will tie
authorized. Actual authorization will be gov-
erned by the provisions of the NCP and the
applicable  ACP.

    12.0 Additional Equipment Necessary to
         Sustain Response Ofjerations

  12.1  A  facility owner or  operator shall
identify sufficient  response resources avail-
able, by contract or other approved means a.s
described in §112,2, to respond to a medium
discharge of animal  fats or vegetables oils
for that facility. This will require response
resources  capable of containing and  ceil-
leciing up 10 36,000 gallons of oil or  10 per-
cent of the worst case discharge, whichever
is less.  All equipment identified must be de-
signed to operate in the applicable operating
environment specified in Table 1  of this ap
pendix.
  12.2  A  facility owner or  operator shall
evaluate the availability cif  adequate tem-
porary storage capacity to sustain the effec-
tive daily recovery  capacities from  equip-
ment identified in the plan. Because of the
inefficiencies of oil spill  recovery devices, re-
sponse plans must  Identify daily storage ca-
pacity equivalent to twice the effective daily
recovery capacity required on SCCMIB. This
temporary storage rapacity may  be reduced
if a  facility owner  or  operator  can dem-
onstrate hy  waste stream analysis that the
efficiencies of the oil recovery devices, abil
ity to decant waste, or OIL- availability of al-
ternative temporary storage or disposal loca
                           Ft, 112, App. E

tions will reduce the overall volume of oily
material storage.
  12.3  A facility owner or operator shall en-
sure that response planning includes the ca-
pability to arrange for disposal of recovered
oil  products. Specific disposal  procedures
will he addressed in the applicable ACP.

       13.0  References and Availability
  13.1  All materials listed in this section
are part of EPA's rulemaking docket arid are
located in the Superfund Docket.  1235 Jeffer
son Davis Highway. Crystal Gateway 1,  Ar-
lington,  Virginia 22202.  Suite 105 (Docket
Numbers SPCC-2P. SPCC-3P, and SPCC-9P).
The docket  is available for inspection  be-
tween 9  a.m. and 4  p.m..  Monday through
Friday, excluding Federal holidays.
  Appointments to review the docket can he
made by  calling 703-603-9232.  Docket hours
are subject to change. As provided in 40 CFR
part 2, a reasonable fee  may be charged for
copying services.
  13.2  The docket will mail copies of mate-
rials to requestors who are outside the Wash-
ington. DC metropolitan area. Materials may
be available  from other  sources, as noted in
this section. As provided in 40 CFR part  2. a
reasonable fee may  l>e charged  for copying
services.   The  RCRA/Superfund  Hotline  at
800-424-9346  may also  provide  additional in-
formation on where to obtain documents. To
contact the  RCRA/Superfund Hotline  in  the
Washington,  DC metropolitan  area, dial 703-
412-9810. The Telecommunications Device for
the Deaf (TDD)  Hotline  number is 800-553-
7672, or, in the Washington, DC metropolitan
area.  703-412-3323.

              13.3 Documents
  (1) National Preparedness for Response  Ex-
ercise Program  (PREP).  The PREP  draft
guidelines are available from  United States
Coast  Guard Headquarters  (G-MEP-4).  2100
Second Street,  SW..  Washington. DC 20593.
(See 58 FR 53990-91. October 19.  1993. Notice
of Availability of PREP Guidelines).
  (2)  "Guidance for Facility and Vessel  Re-
sponse Plans: Fish and Wildlife and Sensitive
Environments (published  in the Federal Reg-
ister  hy DOC/NOAA at 59 FR 14713 22, March
29,  1994.). The guidance is available in  the
Superfund Docket (see sections 13.1 and  13.2
of this appendix).
  (3) ASTM Standards. ASTM F 715. ASTM K
989. ASTM  F 631-99.  ASTM F 808-83 (1999).
The ASTM standards are available  from  the
American Society for Testing and Materials,
100  Barr  Harbor Drive, West Consliohocken,
PA 19428-2959.
  (4)  Response Plans  for  Marine Transpor
tation-Related   Facilities,  Interim  Final
Rule. Published by USCG. DOT at 5» FR 7330-
76. February 5. 1993.
                                           75

-------
Pf. 112, App. E                                               40 CFR Ch. I  (7-1-05 Edition)

               TABLE 1 TO APPENDIX E—RESPONSE RESOURCE OPERATING CRITERIA








Oil Recovery Devices
Operating environment







Significant wave
height '
< i loot , 	 	 ,
< 3 teet
< 4 teet 	 ,
< 8 teet 	



Sea state
1
2
2-3
3-4


                                                Boom

Boom property
Significant wave Height ' 	 . ........


Reserve Buoyancy to Weigh! Ratio 	 	
Skirt Fabric Tensile Strength— pounds 	
Skirt Fabric Tear Strength — pounds 	

Rivers and
canals
s 1 	
1
6-1 B
2;1 	 	
4.500 	
200 	
100
Us
Inland
< 3 ...
2
18-42
2:1 	
15,000-
20.000.
300 	
100 	
e
Great Lakes
<4 	
2-3
18—42
2:1 	
15,000-
20,000
300 	
100 	

Ocean
<6
3-4
>42
3:1 to 4:1
>aoooo
500
125
  '0il recovery devices and boom snail be at least capable o< operating In wave heights up to and including the values listed In
Table 1 lor each operating environment.

       TABLE 2 TO APPENDIX E—REMOVAL CAPACITY PLANNING TABLE FOR PETROLEUM OILS
Spill location
Sustainability of en-water oil recovery
Oil group'



4 — Heavy crudes and iuete .................
Rivers and canals
3 days
Percent nat-
ural dissipa-
tion
80
40
20
5
Percent re-
covered
floating oil
10
IS
15
20
Percent cil
onshore
10
45
65
75
Nearshore/lnlano/Great Lakes
4 days
Percent nat-
ural disspa-
tior,
BO
50
30
10
Percent re-
covered
floating oil
20
50
50
SO
Percent oil
onshore
10
30
50
70
  1 The response resource considerations for non-petroleum oils other than animal fats and vegetable oils are outlined In section
7.7 of this appendix.
  NOTE: Group 5 oils are defined in section  1.2.8 of this appendix: the response resource considerations are outlined in section
7.6 of this appendix.

        TABLE 3 TO APPENDIX E—EMULSIFICATON FACTORS FOR PETROLEUM OIL GROUPS '

Non-Persistent Oil:
  Group 1
Persistent Oil:
  Group 2	
  Group 3	
  Group 4	
Group 5 oils are defined in section 1.2.7 of this appendix; the response resource considerations are outlined in section
  7.6 ot this appendix.

  < See sections 1 £.2 and 1.2.7 of this appendix for group designations lor non-persistent and persistent oils, respectively.

      TABLE 4 TO APPENDIX E—ON-WATER OIL RECOVERY RESOURCE MOBILIZATION FACTORS
1.6
2.0
Operating area

IntanoYNearshore Great Lakes 	
Tien
030
0.16
Tier 2
0.40
0.25
TierS
0.60
0.40
  Note: These mobilization factors are for total resources mobilized, not incremental response resources,

            TABLE 5 TO APPENDIX E—RESPONSE CAPABILITY CAPS BY OPERATING AREA

February 18, 1993:
All exccot Rivers & Canals. Great Lakes 	
Tier 1
1 0K bbls/dav
Tier 2
20K bbls/dav
Tiers
40K bbls/dav.
                                                 76

-------
Environmental Protection Agency                                          Pt. 112, App.  E

      TABLE 5 TO APPENDIX E—RESPONSE CAPABILITY CAPS BY OPERATING AREA—Continued


Rivers & Canals
February 18,1998:


February 18, 2003:

Rivers & Canals 	
Tierl
SK bbls/day
1.5K bbls/day
12 5K bbls/day
6 35K bbls/day
1 675K bbls/
day
TBO
TBD
TBD
Tiers
10K bbls/day
3 OK bbls/day
25K bbls/day
1 2 3K bbls/day
3 75K bbls/day
TBD
TBO
TBO
Tiers
20K bbls/day
6.0K bbls/day.
SQK bbls/day
JSK bbls/day
7 SK bbls/day
TBD
TBD
TBO.
  Note: The caps show cumulative overall effective daily recovery capacity, not incremental increases.
  TBD.To Be Determined.

 TABLE 6 TO APPENDIX E—REMOVAL CAPACITY PLANNING TABLE FOR ANIMAL FATS AND VEGETABLE
                                                   OILS
Spill location
Sustainability of on-water oil recovery
Oil group *

Group B 	
Rivers and canals
3 days
Percent nat-
ural loss
40
20
Percent re-
covered
floating oil
15
15
Percent re-
covered oil
from on-
shore
45
65
Nearshore/lnland/Great Lakes
4 days
Percent nat-
ural loss
SO
30
Percent re-
covered
floating oil
20
20
Percent re-
covered oil
tram on-
shore
30
50
  'Substances with a specific gravity greater than 1.0 generally sink below the surface of the water. Response resource consid-
erations are outlined in section 10,6 of this appendix. The owner or operator ot the facility is responsible for determining appro-
priate response resources tor Group C oils including locating oil on the bottom or suspended in the water column; containment
boom or other appropriate methods for containing oil that may remain floating on the surface; and dredges, pumps, or  other
equipment to recover animal fats or vegetable oils from the bottom and shoreline.
  NOTE: Group C oils are defined in sections 1.2.1 and 1.2.9 of this appendix; the response resource procedures are discussed
in section 10.6 of this appendix.


    TABLE 7 TO APPENDIX E—EMULSIFICATION FACTORS FOR ANIMAL FATS AND VEGETABLE OILS
Oil Group1:
    Group A ,
    Group B .
1.0
2.0
  1 Substances with a specific gravity greater than 1.0 generally sink below the surface of the water. Response resource consid-
erations are outlined in section 10.6 ot this appendix. The owner or operator of the facility is responsible (or determining appro-
priate response resources for Group C oils including locating oil on the bottom or suspended in the water column; containment
boom or other appropriate methods tor containing oil that may remain floating on the surface; and dredges, pumps, or other
equipment to recover animal fats or vegetable oils from the bottom and shoreline.
  NOTE: Group C oils are defined in sections t.2.1  and  1.2,9 ot this appendix; the response resource procedures are discussed
in section 10.6 of this appendix.
                                                   77

-------
Pt. 112, App, E                                              40 CFR Ch.  I (7-1-05 Edition)

                                  ATTACHMENTS TO APPENDIX E

                                         Att*ChlMDt 1-1 --
                          Vork»h*ct  to Plan Volume o£ Reaponae x««ourc*i
                             for Mont Cacft Discharge  - P*trol«um Oil*
        Part  I  Background. ta£o_rgfltion
        Step  (A)  Calculate Horat Case Discharge in barrels {Appendix D",    |	
Step  \S> GL1 Group1  [Table-  3  and section 1-2 o£ ^Kia appendix)



step  (C) Operating  Area (choose one]

                                                      r:d Great
                                                      Lak«B
        Step  (C)  Percentages of Oil  (Table  2  of this appendix!
             Percent Lost, t j
           a t u r a 1  Disci pat.: or.
                                  Percent Recovered
                                     Floating  Oil
                                                                                  or Rivers
                                                                                  and
                                                                                  Canals
                                                                           Oil Onshore
        Step  (Eli  Or.-Hater Oil Recejvery  Step  i~ voiw^c -at 1!^.* tt,LAl oil sto'*je c«p«cicy it ttvc f*CilUy-   F^i piirpftiita ;if thia c»li
                                                 78

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                                     Pt.  112, App. E
                                        g-1 (cootinu»d) --
                              to Plan Volum of R«pou*  RMOurcis
                      for Wor»t €••• Diccliargo - Petroleum Oils
  Part II On-Mater Oil Recovery Capacity (barreld/day)


          Tie/: I                        Tier  2
     st«p  « ST«p tF>
         Step (CD
Step <£!> X St«p IF) It
     5t«p  (62)
                                                                   Tier  3
Stop (E1J x Step (F) «
     Step 
Part III Shor^yine Cleanup yolume (barrels) . . Part IV On-Watg;jy Pegponse Capacity By Operating Area (Table 5 of this appendix) (Amount needed to be contracted for in barrels/day) step (E2) > sttp ( Tier 3 U!) (J3) Part V On-Water Amount Needed to be Ldttntj.fied. but not Contracted Cor in fidvanca (barrels/day) Tier 1 Tier 2 ' Tier 3 II Il«r 1 - Step (JD P.rt II Titr 2 - tttp (JS) II Her 3 - step NOTE: To convert from barrels/day to gallons/day, multiply the quantities in Parts II through V by 42 gallons/barrel. 79

-------
Pt. 112, App. E
40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-05 Edition)
                          Morttah««t to Plan Voluaw of R»pon** R«aourc
                            Cor Nor*t C*l* Diacktr?* -  P«trol*ura Olli
        Part  I Background _lo format ion

        Step  [Ai  Calculate Worst Ca.ee Discharge In barrels  :Appendtx p-    I    170,000
        Step  (BJ Oil Group1 {Table 3 and flection  X-2 of this appendix)
        Step  fC)  Operating Area  Ichoose one;  .  .
                                                          shore,' Inla
              (£}  Percentages of Cil  (Table 2 of this appendix)
            Percent Lost to
          Natural  DiesiF»tit>
                                             Floating  Oil

                                                  50	
                                                                       Percent  Oil Onshore
        Step  (Ell  Gn-Water Oil Recovery Step  (DZi x StCB  tAl

                                                 100
              (S21  Shoreline Recovery   Step (D3l x Step  (A.'
        Seep  (Ft  Emuisi f.ica*ion Factcr
          (Table  '3  o:' this appendix)   .  .
        Step   tw hrmd to d*^r«rn« the p^rcsntiie of tht fkeitrty'i totil oft  ttor««« capacity.
                                                 80

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                                     Pt. 112, App. E
                       Attachment Z-l  Bx«mpl*. (continued) --
                  Worksheet to Plan volume of xe. x
        Stic (G1>
Step 
                                                                     Tier
                                                                     40,000
           
                                 Part U Tier J - Step tJ2)
                                                              Purt II Tier 3 - step UJ>
 HOT6:   To convert from barrels/day to gallons/day, multiply  cue  quantities ii
 Parts  II through V by 42 gallons/barrel,
                                         81

-------
Pt. 112, App. E
                   40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-05 Edition)
                                       Attachment 1-2 - •
                         Nerkaheat to Flan volun* o*  R«*pon«* Resource*
                    for lfor»t Caaa Discharge  - Animal r«t> and V«g*eabl* dim
        Part I Background **fo.rTriaJLi.QJi

        Step iA?  Calculate Karat Ca.ee Discharge  in bartele  (Appendix  D)
        Step {BJ  Oil Group1  {Table  ^  and  section 1.3 of this appendix)  .


        Step 1C)  Cperacin<3 Area (choose one;  ,  ,  ,  .
                                                         nd Great
        Step (D)  Pej-cfcntagee of Oii tTable f> of this  appendix)
            Percent Lost to
          Natural Dissipation
                               I
Flottlng Oil
        Step (El)  OR-water oil Recovery
        Step !E2I  Shoreline Recovery   SCCP tP3}  x SEeo lAI
                               Percent
                              i3 Ofiahote
        Step (P)  Enulaification Factor
         (Tabla 7 of this appendix)
        Step JGJ On-Water Oil Recovery Resource Hobilization Factor
         {Table 4 c.f this appendix)
                                               82

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                                   Pt 112, App. E
                                      S-2 (continued)  --
                   ttor)t«)ift*t to Plan Volun« oE Ra«pon«* R»«ottrc*«
              for Hor.t Caa« DiiehAre* - Aniaal  Jut* Mid V«g«tabl« Oil*
   Part  It On~Ma^ar Oil Recovery Capacity  (barrela/day)


          Tier 1                     Tier 2
     St«p (ED R Stfp (F) X
          st>p ton
(tip (CD * Sttp (» «
    Sttp (12)
                                                            Sttp (El) II St«f> (F) I
    Part III Shoreline Cleanup Volume  (barrels)  .  .  .
   Part IV On-Water Reapenae Capacity 8v Operating Area
   (Table S of  this appendix)
   (Amount needed co be contracted for in barrels/day)
          Tier  1
                                       Tier 2
                                                               $«»>                          (J!)                          (J2>
                                                            P.rt II Tier > • Iltp 
   NOTE:  To convert  from barrels/day to gallons/day, multiply the
   quantities in  Parts IX through V by 42 gallons/barrel.
                                        83

-------
Pt. 112, App. E
                     40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-05 Edition)
                             Attachtt»nt  E-2 Bxutpl*  --
                             to  Plan Volume of  R*spons« R**ourc«m
            for Hoc-it Ca»« Discharge  -  Animal Pat*  and Vegetable Oil*
   Pare I Background Information

   Step (A)  Calculate Worst Case Discharge in barrels
    (Appendix  D)	
soo,
000
   Step  !B) Oil  Group- (Table  7 and section  1.2 of this
    appendix)  	
   Step  1C)  Operating Area (choose
    one)
               Near
               shore/Inl
               and Great
               Lakes
   Step  (D)  Percentages  of  Oil  (Table  fi  of this appendix)
or
Rivers
and
Canals
      Percent  Lost to
          Natural
        Dissipation

             30
 Percent  Recovered
    Floating Oil


	20	
Percent  Oil
  Onshore
                                                                      SO
   Step  (Ell  On -Water Oil  Recovery  £l;ep JD2) x steP
                                          100
                                                                    100,000
   Step  (E2)  Shoreline  Recovery   Step (D3I  x Step                             (taj

 ' A faculty that handla«, atorat, ar tranaporti lultlpla group* of all mitt do leparata calculation far ai
 oil group on ifta aicept far thaaa oil groupo that conatitlRa 10 pareant ar laa> by valuM af tha tatal all
 itaraga capacity at tha facility. For purpoaoa af thU calculation, tha voluna* af all praducta In an ail
 group auft b* niaMiJ to datenalna tha pareantaga of tha facflfty'f tatal atl starag* capacity.
                                         84

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                                   Pt. 112, App. F
                     Attachment K-2 Example (continued) --
                Worksheet to Plan  Volume of Response Resources
   for Worst Can*  Discharge - Animal  Fats and Vegetable Oils (continued)
 Part  II  On-Water OiL Recovery .Capacity (barrels/day)


                                    Tier 2
        Tier  1
        30,000
                                     50,000
    Step (El) > step 

x step <&1> step (El) x step x step < Tier 1 Tier 2 12,500 25,000 Tier 3 50.0CO Pare v On-Wa_ter Amount Needed to be^Jdencified. but not Contracted for in Advance (barrels/day) Tier l Tier 2 Tier 3 17,500 25,000 30,000 n Her t - step


-------
Pt.  112. App. F

1.7  Plan Implementation
  1.7.1   Response Resources for  Small. Me-
    dium, and Worst Case Spills
  1.7.2   Disposal Plans
  1.7.3   Containment and Drainage Planning
1.8  Sclf-Inspertlan. Drills/Exercises, and Re
sponse Training
  1.8.1   Facility Self-Inspection
  1.8.1.1  Tank'Inspection
  1.8.1.2  Response Equipment Inspection
  1.8.1.3  Secondary Containment Inspection
  1.8.2   Facility Drills/Exercises
  1.8.2.1  Qualified   Individual  Notification
    Drill Logs
  1.8.2.2  Spill Management Team Tabletop
    Exercise Logs
  1.8.3   Response Tra i ni 11 g
  1.8.3.1  Personnel Response Training Logs
  1.8.3.2  Discharge Prevention Meeting Logs
1.9  Diagrams
1.10  Security
2.0  Response Plan Cover Sheet
3.0  Acronyms
4.0  References

   1.0 Model Facility-Specific Response Plan
  (A) Owners  or operators of facilities regu-
lated under this part which pose a threat  of
substantial harm to the  environment by dis-
charging ail  into or on  navigable waters  or
adjoining shorelines are required to prepare
and submit facility-specific response plans to
EPA in accordance with  the provisions  in
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-05 Edition)

this appendix.  This  appendix further  de-
scribes the required elements In §112.20(h),
  (B) Response plans must be sent to the ap-
propriate  EPA Regional office. Figure F-l of
this Appendix lists each EPA Regional office
and the address where owners or  operators
must, submit their response plans.  Those fa-
cilities  deemed by the Regional  Adminis-
trator  (RA) to pose a threat  of significant
and substantial harm to the  environment
will have  their plans reviewed and approved
by  EPA.  In  certain cases, information re-
quired  in  the  model response plan  is similar
to information currently maintained in the
facility's   Spill Prevention,   Control,  and
Countenneasures (SPCC) Plan as required by
40 CFR 112.3. In these cases, owners or opera-
tors may  reproduce the Information and In-
clude a photocopy  in the response plan.
  (C) A complex  may develop a single re-
sponse plan with a set of core elements for
all regulating agencies and separate sections
for  the non-transportation related and trans-
portation-related  components,  as  described
in § 112.20(h). Owners or operators of large fa-
cilities that handle, store, or transport oil at
more chan one geographically distinct loca-
tion (e.g., oil  storage  areas at opposite  ends
of a single, continuous parcel of  property)
shall, as  appropriate,  develop separate sec-
tions of the response  plan for  each storage
area.
                                           86

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                         Pt.  112, App. F


     /. /  Emergency Response Action Plan

  Several sections of the response plan shall
he co'located for easy access by response per-
sonnel during an actual emergency or oil dis-
charge. This collection of sections shall be
called the Emergency Response Action Plan.
The Agency intends that the Action Plan
contain only as much information as is nec-
essary to  comhar. the discharge and be ar-
ranged so response actions are  not delayed.
The Action Plan may he arranged in a num-
ber of ways. For example, the sections of the
Emergency Response Action Plan may  be
photocopies or condensed  versions  of  the
                                         87

-------
Pt. 112. App. F

forms Included in the associated sections of
the response plan. Each Emergency Response
Action Plan section may be tabbed for quick
reference. The Action Plan shall  be main-
tained in tlie front  of the same binder  that
contains the  complete  response plan or it
shall  be contained  in a separate binder. In
the latter case, both binders shall be kept to-
gether  so  that   the  entire  plan  can  be
accessed by the qualified individual and ap-
propriate  spill  response  personnel.  The
Emergency  Response  Action Plan  shall  be
made up of the following sections:
1.  Qualified Individual Information  (Section
  l.Z)  partial
2.  Emergency Notification Phone List (Sec-
  tion 1.3.1) partial
3.  Spill Response Notification Form (Section
  1.3.1) partial
4.  Response  Equipment List  rind  Location
  (Section 1.3.2) complete
5.  Response Equipment Testing and Deploy-
  ment (Section 1.3.3) complete
6.  Facility  Response  Team  (Section 1.3.4)
  partial
7.  Evacuation Plan  (Section 1.3.5) condensed
8.  Immediate Actions (Section 1.7.1) com-
  plete
9. Facility Diagram  (Section l.S) complete

          1.2 Facility Information

  The facility information  form is designed
to provide an overview of the sile and a de-
scription of past activities at  the  facility.
Much of the  information required by  this
section  may be obtained from the facility's
existing  SPCC Plan.
  1.2.1 Facility name- and location:  Enter  fa-
cility name and street address. Enter the ad-
dress of  corporate headquarters only  if cor-
porate headquarters are physically located
at the facility.  Include city, county, state,
zip code, and phone number.
  1.2.2 Latitude  and  Longitude: Enter  the
latitude  and  longitude  of  the facility. In-
clude degrees, minutes, and seconds  of the
main  entrance of the facility.
  1.2.3  Wellhead Protection  Arra: Indicate if
the facility is located  in or  drains  into a
wellhead protection area as defined by the
Safe Drinking Water  Act of 19B6  (SDWA).1
The response  plan requirements in the Well-
head Protection Program are outlined by the
  1A wellhead protection area  Is defined as
the surface and subsurface  area surrounding
a water well or wellfleld. supplying a public
water system, through which contaminants
are reasonably likely to move toward  and
reach such water well or wellfield. For  fur-
ther Information regarding Slate and terri-
tory protection programs, facility owners or
operators may contact the SDWA Hotline at
1-800-426-4791.
           40 CFR Ch, I  (7-1-05 Edition)

State or Territory in which the facility re-
sides.
  1.2.4  Owner/oprrator: Write  the name  of
the company or person operating the facility
and the name of the person or company that
owns the facility,  if the  two are different.
List the address of the owner, if the  two are
different.
  1.2.5  Qualified Individual: Write the  name
of the qualified individual for the entire fa-
cility. If more than one person is listed, each
individual  indicated In this  section  shall
have full authority to implement the facility
response  plan,  For  each individual,  list:
name, position,  home and  work addresses
(street addresses, not P.O.  boxes), emergency
phone number, and specific response training
experience.
  1.2 6  Date of Oil Storage Start-up: Enter the
year which the  present facility first started
storing oil.
  1.2.7  Current  Operation: Briefly describe
the  facility's  operations  and include  the
North  American   Industrial  Classification
System (NAICS) code.
  1.2.8  Dates and Type of Substantial Expan-
sion.' Include Information on expansions that
have  occurred  at  the facility. Examples of
such expansions include, hut are not limited
to: Throughput expansion,  addition  of  a
product  line, change of a  product line, and
installation of additional  oil storage capac-
ity. The data provided shall include all facil-
ity historical information  and detail the ex-
pansion  of the  facility.  An example of sub-
stantial expansion is any material alteration
of the facility which causes the owner or op-
erator of the facility to re-evaluate and in-
crease the response equipment necessary to
adequately respond to a worst case discharge
from the facility.
Date of Last Update:	

         FACILITY INFORMATION FORM
Facility Name:	
  Location (Street Address):	
  City:	State:	Zip:	
  County:	Phone Number: (   )
  Latitude:	Degrees 	 Minutes
    	Seconds
  Longitude:	Degrees	Minutes
    	Seconds
Wellhead Protection Area:  	
Owner:    	
  Owner Location (Street Address):	
      (if different from Facility Address)
  City:	State:	Zip:	
  County:	Phone Number: (    )
Operator (if not Owner):   	
Qualified  Individual(s):  (attach  additional
sheets if more than one)
  Name:	
  Position:   _   	__^____  __
  Work Address""2_i	I	
  Home Address:	
  Emergency Phone Number: (     )	
                                           88

-------
Environmental Protection Agency

Date of Oil Storage Start-up:	
Current Opera t Ions:	
Date(s) and  Type(s)  of Substantial Expan
  sion(s):	
(Attach additional sheets if necessary)

     1.3  Emergency Response Information
  (A) The Information provided In this sec-
tion shall describe what will be needed in an
actual emergency involving the discharge of
oil or a combination of hazardous substances
and  oil discharge. The Emergency Response
Information section of the plan must include
the following components:
  (1) The information  provided in the Kmer-
gency Notification  Phone List  in  section
1.3.1 identifies and prioritizes the names arid
phone numbers of the  organizations and per-
sonnel that need to be notified immediately
in the event of an emergency. This section
shall include all the appropriate phone num-
bers for tlie facility. These numhers must  l>e
verified each time  the plan is updated. The
contact list must be accessible to all facility
employees  to ensure  that, in  case of a dis-
charge, any employee on site could  imme-
diately notify the appropriate patties.
  (2) The  Spill Response Notification  Form
in section  1.3.1 creates a checklist  of  Infor-
mation that shall  he  provided to  the Na-
tional Response Center  (NRC) and other re-
sponse  personnel. All Information on this
checklist must he known at ttie time of noti-
fication, or be in the process of being col-
lected. This notification form is  based on  a
similar form used hy the NRC. Note: Do not
delay spill notification  to collect the  infor-
mation on the list.
  (3) Section 1.3.2 provides a  description  of
the  facility's  list  of emergency response
equipment  and  location  of  the response
equipment. When appropriate,  the amount  of
oil that emergency response equipment can
handle and  any limitations (e.g., launching
sites) must be described.
  (4) Section  1,3.3 provides  information  re-
garding response equipment tests  and de-
ployment drills. Response equipment deploy-
ment exercises shall be  conducted to ensure
that response equipment is operational and
the personnel who would operate the equip-
ment In a  spill response are capable of de-
ploying and operating it. Only a represent.a-
t ive  sample of each type of response equip-
ment needs to  he deployed and operated, as
long  as  the remainder  is  properly  main-
tained.  If appropriate,  testing of response
equipment  may  be conducted while  it  is
being deployed. Facilities without  facility-
owned response equipment must ensure that
the oil spill removal  organization  that  is
Identified in the response plan  to provide
this  response equipment certifies that the
deployment exercises  have been met.  Refer
                           Pt. 112, App. f

to the National  Preparedness for Response
Exercise  Program (PREP)  Guidelines  (see
Appendix E to this part, section 13, for avail-
ability),   which satisfy Oil  Pollution  Act
(OPA) response exercise requirements.
  (5) Section 1.3.4 lists the facility response
personnel, including those employed hy the
facility and those under contract to the fa-
cility for response activities, the amount of
time needed for personnel to respond, their
responsibility In the case of an emergency.
and their  level of response  training. Three
different forms are included in this section.
The  Emergency  Response  Personnel  List
shall be composed of all personnel employed
by the facility whose duties involve respond-
ing to emergencies, including oil discharges,
even when they are not physically present at
the site. An example of this type of person
would be the Building Engineer-in-Charge or
Plant Fire Chief. The second form is a list of
the Emergency Response  Contractors  (both
primary  and secondary) retained by the fa-
cility.  Any  changes  in  contractor  status
must be reflected  in updates to the response
plan.  Evidence  of contracts witli response
contractors shall be included in this  section
so that the availability of resources can lie
verified.  The last form is the  Facility Re-
sponse Team List, which shall be  composed
of both emergency response  personnel  (ref-
erenced by Job  title/position) and emergency
response contractors, included in  one of the
two lists  described above, that will respond
immediately upon discovery of ari oil dis
charge or other emergency  (i.e., the first
people to respond). These are to be persons
normally on the facility premises or primary
response contractors. Examples of these per-
sonnel would he the Facility Hazardous Ma-
terials  (HAZMAT) Spill  Team  1, Facility
Fire Engine Company  i,  Production Super-
visor, or Transfer Supervisor. Company per-
sonnel must he able to respond  Immediately
and adequately  if contractor support  Is not
available.
  (6) Section 1.3.5  lists  factors that must, as
appropriate, he considered when preparing an
evacuation plan.
  (7) Section 1.3.6  references the responsibil-
ities of the qualified individual for the facil-
ity in the event of an emergency.
  (B) The Information provided  in the emer-
gency response section will aid in the assess-
ment of the facility's ability to respond to a
worst case discharge and will identify addi-
tional assistance that  may be needed. In ad-
dition, the facility owner or operator may
want  to  produce a  wallet-size  card con-
taining  a  checklist of the  immediate re-
sponse and notification steps to he taken in
the event of an oil discharge.

             1.3.1  Notification

Date of Last Update:	
                                           89

-------
                                                                                                                                     I
Pt. 112, App. F
 EMERGENCY NOTIFICATION PHO^E LIST WHOM
                  To NOTIFY
Reporter's Name:	
Date:   	   '	
Facility Name:   	
Owner Name:   		
Facility Identification Number:	
Date and Time of Each NRC Notification:
          Organization
                                   Phone No.
1. National Response Center (NRC):      1-800-424-8802

2. Qualified Individual;

   Evening Phone:

3. Company Response Team

   Evening Phone:

4. Federal On-Soene Coordinator (OSC)
  and/or  Regional Response  Center
  (RBC):                         	

   Evening Phone(s);

   Pager Numberfs):

5. Local Response Team (Fire Dept-/Co-
  operatives):

6. fire Marshall:

   Evening Phone:

7. State Emergency Response Commis-
  sion (SERC):

   Evening Phone:

6, State Police:

9. Local Emergency Planning Committee
  (LEPC);                       	

10. Local  Water Simply System.

   Evening Phone:

It. Weather Report:

12. Local Television/Radio Station tor
  Evacuation Notification:

13. Hospitals:
                                           40 CFR Ch, I (7-1-05 Edition)

                                    SPILL RESPONSE NOTIFICATION FORM
                               Reporter's Last Name:	
                               First:	"	
                               M.I.:	
                               Position;	
                               Phone Numbers:
                                 Day (    )
                                 Evening (    )
                               Company:	^
                               Organization Type:  	__	
                               Address:		
                               City:	
                               State:  	:	.	.
                               Zip:  	._	
                               Were Materials Discharged?	  _ (Y/N) Con-
                                 fldenf-ial?	(Y/N)
                               Meeting  Federal   Obligations  to  Report?
                                 	(Y/N) Date Called:	
                               Calling for Responsible Party? 	_  (Y/N)
                                 Time Called:	

                                            Incident Description

                               Source  and/or Cause of Incident:          	
                               Date of Incident:
                               Time of Incident:
                                                       AM/PM
                               Incident Address/Location:
                               Nearest   City:__	   State:	
                                 County:	Zip:	
                               Distance from City:	Units of Measure:
                                 	Direction  from City:	
                               Section:	Township:	Range:
                                 	Borough:	
                               Container Type:	Tank Oil Storage Ca-
                                 pacity: 	Units of Measure:	
                               Facility Oil Storage Capacity;	 Units
                                 of Measure:	
                               Facility Latitude: _      Degrees	  Min
                                 utes	Seconds
                               Facility  Longitude:	Degrees	
                                 Minutes	Seconds

                                                  Material
   CHRIS Code
Discharged quan-
     tity
                                  Unit 01 measure
 Material Dis-
charged in water
                                                                    Quantity
                                                                                 Unit of measure
                                              90

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                          Pt.  112, App. F
   CHRIS Code
                               Un*o, measure
                                                              Quantity
                                                                          Unit of measure
              Response Action
Actions Taken to Correct, Control or Miti-
  gate Incident:
                  Impact

Number of Injuries:	Number of Deaths:

Were There  Evacuations? 	 (Y/N)  Nutn
  her Evacuated:	
Was there any Damage?	(Y/N)
Damage in Dollars (approximate):    	
Medium Affected:	
Description:	
More Infcjrmation about Medium:       	
             Caller Notifications
EPA?	(Y/N)  USCG?	(Y/N) State?
  	(Y/N)
Other?	(Y/N) Describe:	

        1.3.2  Response Equipment List

  Date of Last Update:	

     FACILITY RESPONSE EQUIPMENT LIST

1. Skimmers/Pumps—Operational Status:  	
  Type. Model, and Year:	
    Type   Model    Year
  Number:	
  Capacity:	gal. /mi n.
  Daily Effective Recovery Rate:	
  Storage Location(s):	
  Date Fuel Last Changed:
           Additional Information
Any information about the incident not re-
  corded elsewhere in the report:
2. Boom—Operational Status: _^	
  Type. Model, and Year:	
   Type    Model   Year
  Number:
  Size (length):
ft.
  Containment Area:	sq. ft.
  Storage Location:	
EP

Type




A's NCP Product Schedule)
Amount




Date
purchased




Treatment
capacity




Storage
location




  Were  appropriate  procedures  used  to re-
ceive approval  for use of dlspcrsants in ac-
cordance with the NCP (40 CFR 300.910) and
the Area Contingency Plan (ACP), where ap-
plicable?	(Y/N).
  Name and State of On Scene  Coordinator
(OSC) authorising use:	.
  Date Authorized:	.
  4. Dispersant Dispensing Equipment—Oper-
ational Status:
Type and year




Capacity




Storage
location




Response
time
(minutes)




                                          91

-------
Pt.  112, App. F
40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-05 Edition)

5. Sorhents— Operational Stati
Type and Year Purchased:
Amount:
Absorption Capacity (gal.):
Storage Location (s): 	
6. Hand Tools— Operational St
Type and year




7. Conimunic
era ting freque
lular phone n

Type and year


Quantity




js:
	 —
dtus:

Storage
location




atlon Equipment (Include op-
ficy and channel and/or eel-
umbers}— Operational Status:
Quantity


Storage location/
number


8. Fire Fighting and Personnel Protective
Equipment -Operational Status: 	 	
Type and year


Quantity


Storage
krcation


Type and year


Quantity


9. Other (e.g.. Heavy Equipni
Motors)— Operational Status:
Type and year




Quantity




Storage
location


ent. Boats and

Storage
location




                                             1.3.3  Response Equipment Testjng.'Deploynirnt
                                              Date of Last Update:	

                                                   Response Equipment Testing and
                                                       Deployment Drill Log
                                             Last Inspection or Response Equipment Test
                                              Date:	             	
                                             Last Deployment Drill Date:   	
                                             Deployment Frequency:	
                                             Oil Spill Removal Organl/aticm Certification
                                               (if applicable):	

                                                           1.3.4  Perstinin-1
                                               Date of Last Update:	
                            EMERGENCY RESPONSE PERSONNEL
                                    Company Personnel
Name
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Phone'












Response time












Responsibility during re-
sponse action












Response training type/date












 1 Phone number to be used when person is not an-srte,
                                          92

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
Pt. 112, App.  F
                               EMERGENCY RESPONSE CONTRACTORS
                                      Date of Last Update:
Contractor
1.
2.
3.
4.

Phone





Response timo





Contract responsibility1













  •Include evidence ot contracts/agreements with response  contractors to ensure the availability of personnel and response
equipment.


                                     FACILITY RESPONSE TEAM

                                      Date of Last Update:	
Team member
Qualified Individual:

















Response time (minutes)


















Phone or pager number (day/evening)
I
1
1
1
/
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
  NOTE: ff the facility uses contracted help in an emergency response situation, the owner or operator must provide the contrac-
tors' names and review the contractors' capacities to provide adequate personnel and response equipment.
                                                93

-------
Pt. 112, App. F

           1.3.5  Evacuation Plans

  1.3.5.1  Based on  the analysis of the facil-
ity, as discussed elsewhere in the plan, a fa-
cility-wide evacuation plan shall be devel-
oped. In addition plans to evacuate parts of
the facility that are at a  high risk of expo-
sure in  the event of a discharge or other re-
lease must be developed.  Evacuation routes
must be shown on  a  diagram of the facility
(see  section  1.9  of  this appendix). When de-
veloping  evacuation   plans,  consideration
must be given to the following factors, as ap-
propriate:
  (1) Location of stored materials;
  (2) Hazard imposed hy discharged material;
  (3) Discharge flow direction:
  (4) Prevailing wind direction and speed;
  (5)  Water currents, tides, or wave condi-
tions (if applicable);
  (6)  Arrival  route of emergency  response
personnel and response equipment;
  (7) Evacuation routes;
  (8) Alternative routes of evacuation;
  (9) Transportation  of injured  personnel to
nearest emergency  medical facility;
  (10)  Location  of alarm/notification sys-
tems;
  (11) The need  for  a centralized  check in
area for evacuation validation (roll call);
  (12) Selection  of a  mitigation  command
center; and
  (13) Location  of  shelter  at the facility as
an alternative to evacuation.
  1.3.5.2  One resource that  may be helpful
to owners or operators in preparing this sec-
tion of  the response plan is The Handbook of
Chemical Hazard Analysis  Procedures hy  the
Federal  Emergency  Management  Agency
(FEMA),  Department  of   Transportation
(DOT),  and  EPA. The Handbook of Chemical
Hazard  Analysis Procedures is available from:
FEMA  , Publication  Office, 500  C. Street,
S.W., Washington, DC 20472. (202) 646-3484.
  1.3.5.3  As specified in 5  112.20(h)(l)(vi),  the
facility owner or operator  must reference ex-
isting community  evacuation plans,  as ap-
propriate,

      ;.3.S Qualified Individual's Duties

  The duties of the designated qualified indi-
vidual are specified  in S 112.20(h)(3)(lx). The
qualified  Individual's  duties  must be  de
scribed  and be consistent with the minimum
requirements in S 112.20(h)(3)(ix). In addition,
the qualified individual must be identified
with  the Facility Information in section  1.2
of the response plan.

           1.4  Hazard Evaluation

  This section requires the facility owner or
operator to examine the facility's operations
closely  and to predict where discharges could
occur. Hazard evaluation is a widely used in-
dustry  practice that allows facility owners
or operators to  develop a complete  under-
standing of  potential  hazards  and  the re-
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-05 Edition)

sponse ar tions  necessary to  address  these
hazards.   The Handbook of Chemical Hazard
Analysis  Procedures, prepared  by  the  EPA,
DOT, and the FEMA and the Hazardous Mate-
rials Emergency Planning Guide (NRT-1). pre-
pared by the National  Response Team  are
good references for conducting a hazard anal-
ysis. Hazard  identification  and  evaluation
will assist facility owners cr operators in
planning  for  potential  discharges, thereby
reducing the  severity of discharge impacts
that may occur In the future. The evaluation
also may help the operator identify and cor-
rect potential sources of discharges. In addi-
tion, special hazards to workers and emer-
gency response personnel's health and safety
shall be  evaluated,  as well as the  facility's
oil spill history.

         1.4.1  Hazard  Identification

  The Tank  and Surface Impoundment  (SI)
forms,  or their equivalent, tliat are part of
this section must be completed according to
the  directions  helow.  {"Surface  Impound-
ment" means a facility  or part of a facility
which  Is  a  natural topographic depression,
man-made excavation, or diked area formed
primarily of earthen materials (although it
may be  lined with man-made  materials),
which is  designed to hold an accumulation of
liquid wastes or wastes containing free  liq-
uids, and which Is not an injection  well or a
seepage  facility.)  Similar  worksheets,  or
their equix-alent, must  be developed for  any
other type of storage containers.
  (1) List each tank at the facility with  a
separate  and distinct identifier. Begin above-
ground tank identifiers with an "A" and t)e-
lowground tank  identifiers with a "B", or
submit multiple sheets with the aboveground
tanks  and belowground  tanks on  separate
sheets.
  (2) Use gallons for the  maximum capacity
of a tank; and use square feet for the area.
  (3) Using  the  appropriate Identifiers  and
the following instructions,  fill In the appro-
priate forms:
  (a) Tank or  SI number—Using the afore-
mentioned identifiers  (A or B)  or  multiple
reporting sheets, idenl ify each tank or SI at
the facility  that stores oil or hazardous ma-
terials.
  (b) Substance Stored—For each tank or SI
identified, record the material that is stored
therein.  If the tank or SI Is  used to store
more than one material, list all of the stored
materials.
  (c) Quantity  Stored—For  each  material
stored  in each tank or SI, report the average
volume of material stored on any given day.
  (d) Tank Type or Surface Area/Year—For
each tank,  report  the  type  of tank (e.g..
floating  top), and the  year  the  tank  was
originally Installed. If the tank has been re-
fabricated, the year that the latest refabrica
tion was completed must be recorded in pa-
rentheses next  to the  year   Installed.  For
                                           94

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
each SI, record the surface area of the im-
poundment and the year it went into service.
  (e) Maximum Capacity—Record the  oper
ational maximum capacity for each tank and
SI.  If the maximum capacity varies with the
season, record the upper and lower limits,
  (0 Failure/Cause—Record  the cause  and
date of any tank or SI failure which has re-
sulted  in a loss of tank or SI contents,
  (4) Using the numbers from the tank and
SI forms, lahel a schematic drawing of the
facility. This drawing  shall  he identical to
any schematic drawings Included  in  the
SPCC Plan.
  (5) Using knowledge of the facility and its
operations, descrihe the following in writing:
  (a) The loading and unloading of trr-mspor
tation  vehicles that risk the discharge of oil
or  release of hazardous  substances during
transport processes.  These operations may
include loading  and  unloading of  trucks,
railroad cars, or vessels. Estimate  the vol-
ume of material involved in transfer  oper-

                              HAZARD IDENTIFICATION TANKS'
                                 Date ot Last Update;	
                           Pt. 112, App. F

ations, if the exact volume cannot he deter-
mined.
  (h)   Day-to-day  operations   tliat  may
present a risk of discharging oil or releasing
a hazardous substance. These activities  in-
clude scheduled venting, piping repair or re-
placement, valve  maintenance,  transfer of
tank contents from one tank to another, etc.
(not Including transportation-related activi-
ties).  Estimate  the volume  of material  in-
volved In these  operations, if the exact vol-
ume cannot be determined,
  (c) The secondary containment volume  as-
sociated with each tank and/or transfer point
at the facility. The numbering scheme devel-
oped on the tallies, or an equivalent system,
must  be  used  to identify each containment
area. Capacities must be listed for each Indi-
vidual unit (tanks, slumps,  drainage traps,
and ponds), as well as the facility total.
  (d) Normal  dally throughput for the facil-
ity and any effect on potential discharge vol-
umes that  a negative or positive change in
that throughput may cause.
Tank No.











Sutoslance Stored
(Oil and Hazardous
Substance)











Quantity Stared
(gallons)











Tank Type/Year











Maximum Capacity
(gallons)











Failure/Cause











  * Tank = any container that stores oil,
  Attach as many sheets as necessary.
                    HAZARD iDEmiFicATiON SURFACE IMPOUNOMEI^TS (Sis)
                                 Date of Last Update:
SI No.





Substance Stored





Quantity Stored
(gallons)





Surface Area/Year





Maximum Capacity
(Sailor*)





FaJ lure/Cause





                                          95

-------
                                                         40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-05 Edition)
Pt.  112, App. F

              HAZARD IDEMTIFICATION SURFACE IMPOUNDMEMTS (Sis)—Continued
                                  Date of Last Update:	
SINc.






Substance Stored






Quantity Stored
(gallons)






Surface Area/Year






Maximum Capacity
(gallons)






Failure/Cause






  Attach as many sheets as necessary.
         ;. 4.2  Vulnerability Analysis
  The  vulnerability  analysis shall  address
the potential effects {I.e., to human health,
property, or the environment) of an oil dis-
charge. Attachment C-111 to Appendix C to
this part provides a method that  owners or
operators shall use to determine appropriate
distances from the facility to fish and wild-
life and sensitive environments. Owners or
operators can use n comparable formula that
is considered acceptable by the KA. If a com-
parable formula is  used,  documentation of
the reliability arid  analytical soundness of
the  formula  must be attached  to  the  re-
sponse plan cover sheet. This analysis must
be prepared for each facility and, as appro-
priate, must discuss the vulnerability of:
  (1) Water  Intakes (drinking,  cooling, or
other);
  (2) Schools;
  (3) Medical facilities;
  (4) Residential areas;
  (5) Businesses;
  <6) Wetlands  or  other sensitive environ-
ments; 2
  (7) Fish and wildlife;
  (8) Lakes and streams;
  (9) Endangered flora and fauna;
  (10) Recreational areas;
  (11) Transportation  routes (air.  land,  and
water);
  (12) Utilities; and
  (13) Other areas  of economic importance
(e.g.. beaches, marinas) including terrestri-
ally sensitive environments, aquatic envi-
ronments, and unique habitats.

   1.4.3  Analysis of the Potential for an Oil
                 Discharge
  Each owner or operator shall  analyze the
probability  of a discharge occurring at the
                                              facility. This analysis shall Incorporate fac-
                                              tors such as oil discharge history, horizontal
                                              range of a potential discharge,  arid vulner-
                                              ability to natural disaster, and shall, as ap-
                                              propriate, incorporate other factors such as
                                              tank age. This analysis will provide Informa-
                                              tion for developing discharge  scenarios for a
                                              worst  case discharge and small arid medium
                                              discharges  and  aid in the development  of
                                              techniques to reduce the size and  frequency
                                              of discharges. The owner or operator  may
                                              need to research the age of the tanks the oil
                                              discharge history at the facility.

                                                 1.4.4 Facility Reportabk Oil Spill History

                                                Briefly describe  ihe facility's reportablc
                                              oil spill3 history for the entire life of the fa-
                                              cility to the extent that such information is
                                              reasonably identifiable, Including:
                                                (1) Date of dlscharge(s);
                                                (2) List of discharge causes;
                                                (3) Materlal(s) discharged;
                                                (4) Amount discharged in gallons;
                                                (5) Amount of discharge that reached navi-
                                              gable waters, if applicable:
                                                (6) Effectiveness and capacity of secondary
                                              containment;
                                                (7) Clean  up actions taken;
                                                (8) Steps taken to reduce possibility of re-
                                              currence:
                                                (9) Total oil storage capacity of the tank(s)
                                              or impoundment(s) from which the material
                                              discharged;
                                                (10) Enforcement actions:
                                                (11)   Effectiveness  of monitoring  equip-
                                              ment; arid
                                                (12)   Descriptlon(s)  of how each oil  dis-
                                              charge was detected.
  2 Refer to  the DOC/NOAA  "Guidance for
Facility and Vessel Response Plans: Fish arid
Wildlife and Sensitive Environments" (See
appendix E to this part, section 13, for avail
ability).
                                                3As described in 4(1  CFR pan: 110, report-
                                              able oil spills are those that: (a) violate ap
                                              plicable water quality  standards, or (b) cause
                                              a fllm or sheen upon or discoloration of the
                                              surface of the water or adjoining shorelines
                                              or cause a sludge or emulsion to be deposited
                                              beneath the surface of the water or upon ad-
                                              joining shorelines.
                                           96

-------
Environmental Protection Agency

The  Information solicited in  this  sen Ion
may lie similar  to requirements in  40  CFR
112.4(a). Any duplicate Information required
hy § 112.4{a) may he photocopied arid inserted.

           1.5  Discharge Scenarios
  In this section, the owner or operator is re-
quired to provide a description of the facili-
ty's worst case discharge,  as well as a small
and  medium  discharge,  as appropriate.  A
multi level planning approach has been  cho-
sen because the response actions to a dis-
charge  (i.e.. necessary response equipment.
products, and  personnel)  are  dependent on
the magnitude of the discharge. Planning for
lesser  discharges is necessary because the
nature of the  response rimy be  qualitatively
different  depending on the quantity of the
discharge. The  facility owner or operator
shall  discuss the potential direction of the
discharge pathway.

     1.5.1  Small and Medium Discharges
  1.5.1.1  To address multi-level planning re-
quirements, the owner or operator must  con-
sider types of facility-specific discharge sce-
narios that may contribute to a small or me-
dium discharge. The scenarios shall  account
for all the operations that take place at the
facility, including but not  limited to:
  (1) Loading and unloading of surface trans-
portation;
  (2) Facility maintenance;
  (3) Facility piping;
  (4) Pumping stations and sumps;
  (5) Oil storage tanks;
  (6) Vehicle refueling; and
  (7) Age and  condition of facility and com-
ponents.
  1.5.1.2  The  scenarios shall  also  consider
factors that affect the response efforts re-
quired by the  facility. These include but are
not limited to;
  (1} Size of the discharge;
  (2) Proximity  to downgradlent wells, wa-
terways, and drinking water intakes;
  (3) Proximity to  fish and wildlife and sen-
sitive environments;
  (4) Likelihood that the discharge will trav-
el offsite (i.e.. topography,  drainage);
  (5)  Location  of  the material  discharged
(i.e.. on a concrete pad or directly on the
soil);
  (6) Material discharged;
  (7)  Weather  or  aquatic conditions  (i.e..
river flow):
  (8) Available remediation equipment;
  (a) Probability of a chain reaction of fail
ures: and
  (10) Direction of discharge pathway.

          l.i.Z  Worst Case Discharge
  1.5.2.1  In this section,  the owner or oper-
ator must identify the worst case discharge
volume at the facility. Worksheets  for pro-
duel ion and non production facility owners
                           Pt. 112,App. f

or operators to use when calculating worst
case discharge are presented in  Appendix D
to this part.  When planning for the worst
case discharge response, all of the aforemen-
tioned factors listed In the small  and me-
dium discharge  section of the response  plan
shall he addressed.
  1.5.2.2  For  onshore storage facilities and
production      facilities,     permanently
manifolded oil storage tanks are defined  as
tanks that are designed, installed, and/or op-
erated in such a  manner  that the  multiple
tanks function as  one storage unit (i.e.. mul-
tiple tank volumes  are  equalized). In  this
section of the response plan, owners or oper-
ators must provide evidence that oil storage
tanks with common piping or piping systems
are not operated as one unit. If such evidence
is provided and  is acceptable to  the RA, the
worst case discharge volume shall  be based
on the combined  oil storage capacity of all
manifold tanks or the oil storage capacity of
the largest single oil storage tank within the
secondary  containment area, whichever  is
greater.  For  permanently  manifolded  oil
storage tanks that  function as  one storage
unit, the worst case discharge shall be based
on the combined  oil storage capacity of all
manifolded tanks  or the oil storage capacity
of the largest  single tank within  a secondary
containment area, whichever is greater. For
purposes of the worst case discharge calcula-
tion, permanently  manifolded  oil  storage
tanks  that are separated by internal divi-
sions for each tank  are considered to be sin-
gle  tanks  and  individual  manifolded  tank
volumes are not combined.

       1.6  Discharge Detection Systems

  In this section,  the facility owner or oper-
ator shall  provide a detailed description  of
the procedures and equipment used  to detect
discharges. A  section on discharge detection
by personnel  and  a  discussion of automated
discharge detection, if applicable,  shall  be
included for  both  regular  operations  and
after hours operations. In addition, the facil-
ity owner or  operator shall  discuss how the
reliability  of  any  automated system will  be
checked and how  frequently the  system will
be inspected.

    1.6.1 Discharge Detection by Personnel

  In this section, facility owners  or opera-
tor's shall  describe  the  procedures  and per-
sonnel that will detect any discharge of oil
or release of a hazardous substance. A thor-
ough discussion of facility inspections must
be included. In addition, a description of ini-
tial  response actions shall he addressed.  This
section shall reference section 1.3.1 of the re-
sponse plan for emergency response informa-
tion.
                                           97

-------
Pt. 112, App. F

     1,6.2  Automated Dlsrharge Detection

  In this section, facility owners or opera-
tors must  describe any automated discharge
detection equipment that the  facility lias in
place. This section shall include a discussion
of overfill alarms,  secondary containment
sensors,  etc.  A discussion of the  plans to
verify  an automated alarm and the actions
to be taken  once verified  must  also he in-
cluded.

           1.7 Flan Implementation

  In this section, facility owners or opera-
tors must explain in detail  how to Imple-
ment the facility's emergency response plan
by describing response actions to be carried
out under the plan to ensure the safety of
the facility and to mitigate or  prevent  dis-
charges  described In section  1.5 of the re-
sponse plan.  This section shall  Include  the
identification  of  response   resources  for
small,  medium, and worst case  discharges;
disposal  plans; and  containment and drain-
age planning. A list  of those  pe;n>onnel who
would  he  involved in the  cleanup shall  he
identified. Procedures that the facility will
use,  where appropriate or necessary, to  up-
date their plan after an  oil discharge event
and the time frame to update  the plan must
be described.

  /. 7. /  Response Resources far Small. Medium.
         and Worst Case Discharages
  1.7.1.1  Once  the discharge scenarios have
been identified in section 1.5 of the response
plan,  the  facility  owner  or operator shall
identify  and describe implementation of the
response actions. The facility owner or oper-
ator shall demonstrate  accessibility to  the
proper response personnel and equipment to
effectively respond  to  all  of  the identified
discharge scenarios. The determination  and
demonstration of adequate response  capa-
bility are  presented in  Appendix E to this
part. In addition, steps to expedite the clean-
up of oil discharges must he discussed. At a
minimum, the following Items must be ad-
dressed:
  (1) Emergency plans for spill response;
  (2) Additional response training;
  {3} Additional contracted help;
  (4) Access  to additional  response equip-
ment/experts: and
  (5) Ability to implement the  plan including
response training and practice  drills.
  1.7.1.2A recommended form  detailing  im-
mediate actions follows.

   OIL SPILL RESPONSE—IMMEDIATE ACTIONS
1. Stop the product flow
Act quickly to secure
  pumps, close valves,
  etc.
                                   40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-05 Edition)

                         OIL SPILL RESPONSE—IMMEDIATE ACTIONS—
                                        Continued
                        2. Warn personnel 	

                        3. Shut off ignition
                          sources.
                        4. Initiate containment
                        5. Notify NRC 	
                        6. Notify OSC
                        7. Notify, as appropriate
                       Enforce safety and secu-
                        rity measures.
                       Motors, electrical circuits,
                        open flames, etc.
                       Around the tank and/or in
                        the water with oil
                        boom.
                       1-800-424-8802
                         Source:  FOSS, Oil Sprll  Response—Emergency Proce-
                        dures, Revised December 3, 1992.

                                    1.7.2  Disposal Mans

                         1.7.2.1   Facility  owners or operators must
                        describe how and where the facility  intends
                        co recover, reuse,  decontaminate, or  dispose
                        of  materials after a  discharge has taken
                        place. The appropriate permits  required to
                        transport  or  dispose of recovered materials
                        according to local. State,  and  Federal  re-
                        quirements  must  be  addressed. Materials
                        that must he accounted for in the disposal
                        plan, as  appropriate. Include:
                         {1} Recovi.-red product:
                         (2) Contaminated soil;
                         (3) Contaminated  equipment  and  mate-
                        rials,  including  drums,  tank parts,  valves,
                        and shovels;
                         (4) Personnel protective equipment;
                         (5) decontamination solutions:
                         (6) Adsorbents; and
                         (7) Spent chemicals.
                         1.7.2.2  These plans must he prepared in ac-
                        cordance  with  Federal  (e.g.,  the  Resource
                        Conservation and   Recovery  Act  (RCRAJ),
                        State, and local regulations, where applica-
                        ble, A copy of the disposal plans from die fa-
                        cility's SPCC Plan may be Inserted with this
                        section,  including any  diagrams  In those
                        plans.
Material
1.
2.
3
4.
Disposal fa-
cility




Location




RCRA per-
mit/manifest




  1.7.3  Containment and Drainage Planning

  A proper plan to contain and control a dis-
charge  through drainage  may  limit  the
threat of harm to human health and the en-
vironment.  This section  shall describe how
to contain and  control a discharge through
drainage, including:
                                           98

-------
Environmental Protection Agency

  (1) The available  volume  of containment
(use the  information presented  in  section
1.4.1 of the response plan);
  (2) The route  of drainage from oil  storage
and transfer areas;
  (3) The  construction materials  used  in
drainage troughs;
  (4) The type arid number of valves arid sep-
arators used in the drainage system;
  (5) Sump pump capacities;
  (6) The containment capacity of weirs and
booms that might he used and their location
(see section 1.3.2 of this appendix); and
  (7) Other cleanup materials.
  In addition, a facility owner or operator
must meet the inspection and monitoring re-
quirements for drainage contained in 40 CFR
part 112, subparts A through C. A copy of the
containment and drainage plans that are re-
quired  in  40 CFR  part  112. suhparts  A
through C may  he inserted  in this section,
including any diagrams in those plans.
  N'OTK: The general permit for stormwater
drainage  may  contain  additional  require-
ments.

   l.S  Seif-lnspecUan, Drills/Exercises, and
             Response Training
  The owner or  operator must, develop pro-
grams for  facility response training  and for
drills/exercises  according  to  the  require-
ments of 40 Cf'R 112.21. Logs must he kept for
facility  drills/exercises, personnel response
training,   and  spill  prevention  meetings.
Much of the recordkeeplng  information re-
quired by  this  section  Is also contained  in
the SPCC Plan required  hy  40 CFR  112.3.
These logs may  be included in the facility re-
sponse plan or kept as an annex to the facil-
ity response plan.

         1.8.1  Facility Self-lniptntion

  Under  40 CFR H2.7(e), you  must  include
the written procedures and records of Inspec-
tions for each facility in the SPCC Plan. You
must include the Inspection records I'or e
-------
Pt.  112, App. F                                        40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-05 Edition)

                  TANK/SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT INSPECTION LOG—Continued
                                      Tank or SI*
                                                           Dale
    1.8,1,2  Response Equipment Inspection
  Using the Emergency Response Equipment
List provided in section 1.3.2 of the response
plan,  describe each type of response equip-
ment, checking for the following:

       Response Equipment Checklist
  1. Inventory (item and quantity);
  2. Storage location;
  3.  Accessibility (time  tc  access and  re-
spond);
  4. Operational status/condition;
  5. Actual use/testing (last test date and fre-
quency of testing); and
  6. Sliflf life (present age, expected replace-
ment date).
Please note any  discrepancies between this
list and the available response equipment.
                           RESPONSE EQUIPMENT INSPECTION LOG
                         'Use section 1.3.3 ot the response plan as a checklist]
           Inspector
                                                                      Comments
                                          100

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                           Pt. 112, App. F
                      RESPONSE EauiPMEr^rr INSPECTION LOG—Continued
                          [Use section 1.3.2 at (he response plan as a checklist]
            Inspector
   I.S.I.3  Secondary Containment Inspectinri

  Inspect tlie secondary containment (as de
scribed in sections  1.4.1 and 1.7.2 of the re-
sponse plan), checking the following:
     Secondary Containment Ch<:rklist
1. Dike or berm system.
  A  Level of precipitation in dike/available
    capacity;
  B. Operational status of drainage valves;
  C. Dike or herm permeability;
  U. Debris;
  E. Erosion;
  K. Permeability of the  earthen floor of
    diked area: and
  C,. Location/status of pipes, inlets, drain-
    age beneath tanks, etc.
2. Secondary containment
  A. Cracks;
  B. Discoloration;
  C. Presence  of spilled  or  leaked material
    (standing liquid);
  D. Corrosion; and
  t. Valve conditions.
3. Retention and drainage ponds
  A. Erosion;
  B. Available capacity;
  C. Presence of spilled or leaked material;
  D. Debris: and
  E. Stressed vegetation.
The tank  inspection  checklist  presented
below  has been Included  as  guidance during
inspections and monitoring. Similar require-
ments  exist  in 40 CFR part 112, subparts A
through  C. Similar requirements exist  in 40
CFR 112.7(e). Duplicate information from the
SPCC Plan may be photocopied and inserted
in this section.

         1.11.2  F.-nility Drills/Exercises
  (A) CWA section 311(j)(5). as amended  by
OPA, requires the response plan to contain a
description of facility  drills/exercises.  Ac-
cording  to 40  CFR  112.Zl(c).  the  facility
owner or operator shall develop a program of
facility  response drills/exercises, including
evaluation procedures. Following the PREP
guidelines (see Appendix E to tills part, sec-
tion 13. for availability) would satisfy a  fa-
cility's   requirements  for  drills/exercises
under this part. Alternately, under §112.ZI(c).
a facility owner  or operator may develop a
program  that  Is not based on  the PREP
guidelines. Such  a program is subject to ap-
proval by the Regional  Administrator based
on the description of the program provided
in the response plan.
  (B)  The PREP  Guidelines specify that the
facility conduct  internal and external drills/
exercises.  The  internal exercises  include:
qualified  individual notification  drills, spill
management team tahletop exercises, equip-
ment  deployment   exercises,   and   unan-
nounced  exercises.   External exercises   in-
clude Area Exercises. Credit for  an  Area or
Facility-specific  Exercise  will  he given  to
the facility for an actual response to  a dis-
charge in the area if the plan was utilized  for
response to the discharge and the objectives
of the Exercise were met and were properly
evaluated, documented, and self-certified.
  (C)  Section  112.20(h)(8)(ii) requires the  fa-
cility owner or operator to  provide a  descrip-
tion of the drill/exercise program to be car-
ried out under the  response plan. Qualified
Individual Notification Drill and Spill Man-
agement Team Tabletop Drill logs shall  he
provided In sections 1.8.2.1 and 1.8.2.2. respec-
tively. These logs may be included in the  fa-
cility response plan or kept as an annex to
the facility response plan. See section 1.3.3 of
this  appendix  for  Equipment  Deployment
Drill Logs.
                                           101

-------
Pt.  112, App. F

 1.8.2.1  Qualified Iruiividual Notifiuition Drill
                    Log;.

 Qualified Individual Notification Drill Log
Date:	
Company:	
Qualified Individual(s): ~I			^	
Emergency Scenario:	
Evaluation:
Changes to be Implemented:   	
Time Table for Implementation:   ___	
   1.S.Z.2 SpillManagement Team Tabletop
                Exercise Logs

 Spill Management Team Tabletop Exercise
                    Log
Date:	
Company:  	.	
Qualified Individuals):	~__^	
Emergency Scenario:	
Evaluation:
           40 CFR Ch. I  (7-1-05 Edition)
Changes to be Implemented:
Time Table for Implementation:	

           1.8.3  Response Training

  Section iU.21(a) requires facility owners or
operators to develop programs for facility re-
sponse training  Facility owners or operators
are required by S 112.2(>(h)(8)(iii) to provide a
description of the response training program
to be carried out under the response plan. A
facility's  training program can be based  on
the USCG's Training Elements for Oil Spill
Response, to the extent applicable to facility
operations, or another response training pro-
gram acceptable to the RA. The training ele-
ments  are available from the USCG Office of
Response  (G-MOR)  at  (202)  267-0518 or  fax
(202) 267-4085.  Personnel response  training
logs and  discharge prevention meeting logs
shall be included in sections  1.8.3.1 and  1.8.3.2
tjf the  response plan respectively. These logs
may he included in the facility response plan
or kept as an annex to the facility response
plan.
                                      	     1.8.3.1  Personnel Response Training Logs
                            PERSONNEL RESPONSE TRAINING LOG
Name










Response training/date and numbei of
hours










PreventK>n training/data and number of
hours










  l.S.3.2  Discharge Prevention Meetings Logs

    DISCHARGE PREVENTION MEKTING Loc
Date:	__,	
Attendees: 	            	    	
                                          102

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                           Pt. 112, App. F
Subject/issue identified







Required action







Implementation date







               1.9 Diagrams

  The facility-specific; response plan shall In-
clude the following diagrams. Additional dia-
grams  that would aid in the development of
response plan sections may also be included.
(I) The Site Plan  Diagram  shall,  as appro-
   priate,  include and identify:
  (A) the entire facility to scale;
  (B) above and below ground hulk oil stor-
   age tanks;
  (C) the contents and capacities of hulk oil
   storage tanks;
  (D) the contents arid  capacity of drum oil
   storage areas;
  (E) the contents and capacities of surface
   impoundments;
  (F) process buildings;
  (G) transfer areas;
  (H) secondary containment systems  (loca-
   tion and capacity);
  (1)  structures where  hazardous  materials
   are stored  or handled,  including mate-
   rials stored and capacity of storage;
  (J) location of communication  and emer-
   gency response equipment;
  (K) location of electrical equipment which
   contains oil; and
  (L) for complexes  only,   the  Interface(s)
   (i.e.,  valve or  component) between the
   portion of the facility regulated by EPA
   and  the  portion (s)  regulated  by  other
   Agencies. In most cases,  this interface is
   defined as the last valve inside secondary
   containment before piping leaves the sec-
   ondary containment area to connect  to
   the transportation related portion of the
   facility (i.e.. the structure used or  in-
   tended  to he used to transfer oil  to  or
   from a  vessel or pipeline). In the absence
   of secondary containment, this interface
   Is  the  valve manifold  adjacent to the
   tank nearest the transfer structure as de-
   scribed above. The interface  may be  de-
   fined differently at a specific facility if
   agreed  to by the RA and the appropriate
   Federal official.
(2) The Site Drainage Plan Diagram shall, as
   appropriate, include:
  (A) major sanitary and storm sewers, man-
   holes, and drains;
  (B) weirs and shut-off valves;
  (C) surface water receiving streams;
  (D) fire fighting water sources;
  (E) other utilities;
  (F) response personnel Ingress and egress;
  (G)   response  equipment  transportation
    routes; and
  {HJ  direction  of discharge  flow  from dis-
    charge points.
(3) The Site Evacuation Plan Diagram shall,
    as appropriate, include;
  {A)   site plan  diagram  with evacuation
    rcmre(s); and
  (B)   location   of  evacuation regrouping
    areas.

               1.10  Security
  According to 40 CFR 112.7(g)  facilities are
required to maintain a certain level of secu-
rity, as appropriate. In this section,  a de-
scription of the facility security shall be pro
vided and include, as appropriate:
(1)  emergency cut-off  locations (automatic
    or manual valves);
(2) enclosures  (e.g., fencing,  etc.);
(3) guards and their duties, day and night;
(4) lighting;
(5) valve and pump locks; and
(6) pipeline connection caps.
The SPCC Plan contains  similar  informa-
tion.   Duplicate  information   may   he
photocopied and inserted in  this section.

       2.0 Response Plan Cover Sheet
  A three-page form lias been developed to he-
completed and submitted to the RA by own-
ers or operators who are required to prepare
and submit a  facility-specific response plan.
The cover sheet  (Attachment F-l)  must ac-
company  the  response plan to provide  the
Agency with  basic  information concerning
the facility.  This section will  describe  the
Response  Plan Cover Sheet arid provide in-
structions for  its completion.

           2.1  General Information
  Owner/Operator of Facility: Enter the name
of the  owner of the facility (if the owner is
the operator). Knter the operator  of the fa-
cility If otherwise. If the owner/operator of
                                          103

-------
Pt.  112, App. F

the facility is a corporation, erittr the name
of the facility's  principal corporate execu-
tive. Enter as much of the namo as will fit In
each section.
  (1) Facility Name: Enter the proper name of
the facility.
  (2) Facility Address: Enter the street  ad-
dress, city, State, and zip code.
  (3) Facility  Phone Number: Enter the phone
number of the facility.
  (4) Latitude and Longitude:  Enter the facil-
ity latitude and  longitude in degrees, min-
utes, arid seconds.
  (5) Dun and Bradstreel Number: Enter  the
facility's  Dun  and  Bradstreet  number if
available (this information may he obtained
from public library resources).
  (6) North American industrial Classifica-
tion System  (NAICS) Code:  Enter the facili-
ty's NAICS code as determined by the Office
of Management and Budget (this information
may  he  obtained  from public library  re-
sources.)
  (7) Largest Oil Storage Tank Capacity: Enter
the capacity in  GALLONS  of  the largest
aboveground oil storage tank at: the facility.
  (8) Maximum Oil Storage Capacity: Enter the
total maximum capacity in GALLONS of all
ahovegrounti  oil storage tanks at the facil-
ity.
  (9) Number  of Oil Storage Tanks: Enter the
number of all aboveground oil storage tanks
at the facility.
  (10) Wont Case Discharge Amount: Using in-
formation  from the  worksheets in Appendix
D, enter the  amount, of the  worst case  dis-
charge in GALLONS.
  (11) Facility Distance to  Navigable Waters:
Mark the  appropriate  line for the  nearest
distance between an opportunity for  dis-
charge  (i.e..  oil  storage  tank,  piping,  or
flowline) and a navigable water.

 2,2 Applicability of Substantial Harm Criteria
  Using the  flowchart  provided  in  Attach-
ment C-I  to  Appendix C to this  part, mark
the appropriate answer to each question. Ex-
planations of referenced terms can be found
in Appendix C to this part. If .1 comparable
formula to the ones described In Attachment
C-III  to Appendix C  to this part Is used to
calculate the planning distance, documenta-
tion of the reliability and analytical sound-
ness of the formula  must  be attached to the
response plan cover sheet.

             2.3  Certification
  Complete this Mock after all other ques-
tions have  been answered.

               3.0  Acronyms

ACP; Area Contingency Plan
ASTM:  American Society of Testing  Mate-
  rials
bbls: Barrels
hpd: Barrels per Day
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-05 Edition)

bph: Barrels per Hour
CHRIS: Chemical Hazards Response Informs
  tlciii System
CWA: Clean Water Act
DO1: Department of Interior
DOC: Department of Commerce
DOT: Department of Transportation
EPA: Environmental Protection Agency
FEMA:   Federal  Emergency  Management
  Agency
FR: Federal Register
gal: Gallons
gprn: Gallons per Minute
HAZMAT: Hazardous Materials
LEPC:   Local Emergency  Planning  Com-
  mittee
MMS: Minerals Management Service (part of
  D01)
NAICS: North American Industrial  Classi-
  fication System
NCP: National Oil and Hazardous Substances
  Pollution Contingency Plan
NOAA:  National Oceanic and Atmospheric
  Administration (part of DOC)
NRC: National Response Center
NRT: National Response Team
OPA: Oil Pollution Act of 1990
OSC: On-Scene Coordinator
PREP: National  Preparedness for Response
  Exercise Program
RA: Regional Administrator
RCRA: Resource  Conservation arid Recovery
  Act
RRC: Regional Response Centers
RRT: Regional Response Team
RSPA: Research and Special  Programs Ad-
  ministration
SARA:  Superfutid  Amendments  and  Reau-
  thnrlzation Act
SERC:  State Emergency Response Commis-
  sion
SDWA: Safe Drinking Water Act of 1986
SI: Surface Impoundment.
SPCC:  Spill Prevention, Control, and Coun-
  termeasures
USCG: United States Coast Guard

              4.0  References
  CONCAWE, 1982. Methodologies for Hazard
Analysis and Risk Assessment In the Petro-
leum Refining and Storage  Industry. Pre-
pared by CONCAWE's Risk Assessment Ad-
hoc Group.
  U.S.  Department of Housing arid Urban De-
velopment.  1987.  Siting  of  HUD-Assisted
Projects Near Hazardous Facilities: Accept-
able Separation  Distances from Explosive
and Flammable Hazards. Prepared by the Of-
fice  of Environment and  Energy, Environ-
mental Planning Division. Department of
Housing  and Urban  Development.  Wash-
ington, DC.
  U.S.  DOT, FEMA and  U.S. EPA. Handbook
of Chemical Hazard Analysis Procedures.
  U.S.  DOT, FEMA and  U.S. EPA. Technical
Guidance lor Hazards  Analysis:  Emergency
                                          104

-------
Environmental Protection Agency

Planning  for  Extremely   Hazardous  Sub
stances.
  The  National Response  Team.  1S87. Ha/
ardous   Materials   Emergency   Planning
Guide. Washington. DC.
  The  National Response  Team.  1990. Oil
Spil!  Contingency  Planning,  National Sta-
tus: A Report to the President. Washington.
DC. U.S. Government Printing Office.
  Offshore Inspection arid Enforcement Divi-
sion.  1988.  Minerals  Management  Service.
Offshore  Inspection Program:  National Po-
tential  Incident  of Noncomplianre  (PJNC)
List. Reston. VA.

       ATTACHMENTS TO APPENDIX f-

Attachment F-l—Response Plan Cover Sheet
  This rover  sheet will provide  KPA with
basic  information concerning the  facility.  It
must  acxompany  a submitted facility re
spouse plan. Explanations  and detailed In
structions  can he found  in  Appendix  F.
Please type or write legibly in blue or black
ink. Public  reporting burden for the coller-
tion of this  Information is estimated to vary
from 1 hour to 270 hours per response  in the
first year, with an average of 5 hours per re-
sponse. This estimate includes time for re
viewing Instructions, searching existing data
sources, gathering the data needed, and coin
pleting and reviewing the collection of infor-
mation. Send comments regarding the bur-
den estimate  of this  information, including
suggestions for reducing  this  burden to:
Chief, Information Policy Branch,  Mail Code:
PM-2822,  U.S.  Environmental  Protection
Agency, Ariel  Rlos Building,  1200 Pennsyl
vania'Avenue, NW.,  Washington, DC 20461);
and to the Office of Information  and  Regu
latory Affairs, Office of  Management  and
Budget. Washington D.C. 20503.

           GENERAL INFORMATION
Owner/Operator of Facility:
Facility Name:	
Facility Address (street address or route):
City. State, and U.S. Zip Code:
Facility Phone No.:	
Latitude (Degrees: North):
degrees, minutes, seconds
Dun & Bradstreet Number: '
Largest Aboveground Oil Storage Tank Ca
    pacity (Gallons):
                          Pt. 112, App. F

Number of Abovegrounri Oil Storage Tanks:
Longitude (Degrees: West):
degrees, minutes, seconds	
North  American  Industrial  Classification
  System (NAICS) Code: '	
Maximum Oil Storage Capacity (Gallons):  	
Worst Case Oil Discharge Amount (Gallons):
Facility Distance to Navigable Water, Mark
  the appropriate line,	
0- V< mile	 Vt-Vi mile 	 '/z-1 mile	 >1
    mile	

    APPLICABILITY OF SUBSTANTIAL HARM
                 CRITERIA

  Does the  facility transfer oil over-water2
to or from vessels arid  does  the facility have
a total oil storage  capacity greater than or
equal to 42,000 gallons?
Yes	
No	
  Does the facility have a  total oil storage
capacity greater than  or  equal  to  1 million
gallons  and. within any storage area, does
the  facility lark  secondary containment  2
that is sufficiently large  to contain the ca-
pacity of the largest ahoveground oil storage
tank plus  sufficient freeboard to allow for
precipitation?
Yes	
No	
  Does the facility have a  total oil storage
capacity greater than  or  equal  to  1 million
gallons  and is the  facility located at  a dis-
tance l (as calculated  using the appropriate
formula in Appendix C or a comparable for-
mula) such that a discharge from the facility
could cause injury *o  fish  and  wildlife and
sensitive environments?11
Yes   ..	.__.._	
No	
Does the facility have  a total oil storage ca-
  parity greater than  or  equal  to  1 million
  'These numbers may he obtained from pub
lie library resources.
  2 Explanations  of  the  above-referenced
terms can lie found in Appendix C to this
part.  If a comparable formula  to the ones
contained in Attachment C-II1 is used to  es-
tablish the appropriate distance to fish and
wildlife and sensitive environments or  public
drinking water intakes,  documentation  of
the reliability and analytical soundness of
the formula must be attached to this form.
  3For further description offish and wildlife
and sensitive environments,  see Appendices
I, II, and  HI to DOC/NOAA's "Guidance  for
Facility and Vessel Response Plans: Fish and
Wildlife and Sensitive Environments" (see
Appendix E to this part, section 13, for avail-
ability) and the applicable ACP.
                                          105

-------
Pt. 113

  gallons and is the facility located at a dis-
  tance2 (as calculated using the appropriate
  formula in Appendix C or a comparable for-
  mula) such that a discharge from the facil
  ity  would shut  down  a  public  drinking
  water Intake?2	
Yes	
No	
  Does the facility have a total oil storage
capacity  greater than or equal to 1 million
gallons and has the facility experienced a re-
portable oil spill >' In an amount greater than
or equal  to 10,000  gallons within the last 5
years?
Yes   	.	
No	

             CERTIFICATION

  1 certify under penalty of  law that 1 have
personally examined and am familiar with
the information submitted in this document.
and that  hased on  my inquiry of those indi-
viduals responsible for obtaining  informa-
tion, I believe  that the submitted  Informa-
tion is true, accurate, and complete.
Signature:	
Name (Please type  or prim.):	._
Title:	
Date:	,	
159 FR 34122, July 1, 1994; 59 FR 49006. Sept.
26. 1994. as amended at 65 FR 40816. June 30.
2000; 65 FR 43840, July 14, 2000; 66 FR 34561.
June 29. 2001; 67 FR 47152, July 17, 2002)

PART  113—LIABILITY   LIMITS   FOR
  SMALL    ONSHORE    STORAGE
  FACILITIES
Sec.
113.1
113.2
113.3
113.4
     Subport A—Oil Storage Facilities


     Purpose.
     Applicability.
     Definitions.
     Size classes and  associated  liability
   limits for fixer) onshore oil storage facili-
   ties, l.GOO barrels or less capacity.
113.5  Exclusions.
113.8  Effect on other laws.
  AUTHORITY: Sec. 311(0(2). 86 Stat. 867  (33
U.S.C. 1251 (1972))
  SOURCE: 38 FR 25440. Sept. 13, 1973.  unless
otherwise noted.

  Subport A—Oil  Storage Facilities

§ 113.1  Purpose.
  This  subpart establishes size classi-
fications and  associated liability limits
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-05 Edition)

for small onshore  oil storage facilities
with  fixed capacity of  1,000 barrels or
less.

§113.2  Applicability.
  This  subpart applies  to  all onshore
oil storage facilities with fixed  capac-
ity of 1,000 barrels or less. When a dis-
charge to  the waters  of  the  United
States  occurs  from  such  facilities and
when removal  of said discharge  is per-
formed by  the United  States Govern-
ment pursuant to the provisions  of sub-
section 311(c)(l) of the Act, the liability
of the owner or operator  and the facil-
ity will be limited  to the amounts spec-
ified in §113.4.

§113.3  Definitions.
  As used in this subpart. the following
terms shall have  the  meanings indi-
cated below:
  (a)    Aboveground  storage  facility
means  a tank or other container,  the
bottom of which is on a plane not more
than  6 inches  below the surrounding
surface.
  (b) Act means the  Federal Water Pol-
lution  Control  Act, as  amended,  33
U.S.C. 1151, etseq.
  (c) Barrel means  42 United States gal-
lons at 60 degrees Fahrenheit.
  (d)    Belowground  storage  facility
means  a  tank or other  container  lo-
cated other than as defined as "Above-
ground".
  (e) Discharge includes, but is not lim-
ited to any spilling, leaking, pumping,
pouring, emitting, emptying or  dump-
ing.
  (f) Onshore Oil Storage Facility means
any facility (excluding motor vehicles
and rolling stock) of any kind located
in, on, or under, any  land within  the
United States, other than  submerged
land.
  (g)  On-Scene Coordinator is the single
Federal representative  designated pur-
suant to  the  National  Oil  and Haz-
ardous Substances  Pollution Contin-
gency Plan  arid identified  in approved
Regional Oil and Hazardous Substances
Pollution Contingency Plans.
  (h)  Oil  means oil  of  any  kind or in
any form,  including but not limited  to,
petroleum, fuel oil. sludge, oil  refuse,
and oil mixed with  wastes other than
dredged spoil.
                                       106

-------
                                Appendix C: Summary of Revised Rule Provisions
 APPENDIX C: SUMMARY OF REVISED SPCC RULE PROVISIONS
Citation
New Threshold
Requirement
§112.1(d)(2)(i)
and (ii)
Underground
Storage Tanks
(USTs)
§112.1(d)(2)(i)and
112.1
-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
Citation
Oil-Filled Equipment
§112.2
Professional
Engineer (PE)
Certification
§112.3(d)
Plan Location
§112.3(e)(1)
Reportable
Discharge
Notification to EPA
Regional
Administrator (RA)
for SPCC facilities
§112.4
Five-Year Review
Documentation
§112.5(b)and
112.5(c)
Alternative Formats
§112.7
Revised Rule Provision
Oil-filled electrical, operating, and manufacturing equipment does not need to meet the
requirements for bulk storage containers (§112.8) as this equipment is excluded from
the definition of a "bulk storage container." However, this equipment does need to
meet other provisions of the rule, including secondary containment as described in
§112.7(C).
Change from 1974 rule: Clarification on the application of the rule to this type of
equipment.
In order for a facility to comply with the provisions of §1 12.3(d), a licensed Professional
Engineer (PE) must attest to the following:
i. The PE is familiar with 40 CFR part 112;
ii. The PE or his agent has visited and examined the facility;
iii. The Plan has been prepared in accordance with good engineering practice,
including consideration of industry standards and the requirements of the rule;
iv. Procedures for required inspections and testing have been established; and
v. The Plan is adequate for the facility.
Change from 1974 rule: The previous rule required a PE to attest that, through the
examination of the facility and familiarity with the provisions of the rule, the Plan was
prepared in accordance with good engineering practice.
The owner or operator must maintain a complete copy of the Plan at the facility if the
facility is normally attended at least four hours per day.
Change from 1974 rule: The rule previously required a Plan to be located at the
facility if it was attended for at least eight hours per day.
Whenever a facility has a discharge as described in §1 12.1 (b) that is greater than
1 ,000 gallons of oil or two discharges each of more than 42 gallons of oil occurring
within any 12-month period, the facility must submit certain information regarding the
spill to the RA. The SPCC Plan does not need to be submitted unless requested by the
RA.
Change from 1974 rule: Previously, the SPCC Plan was submitted to the RA as part
of the reporting requirement, and there was a different threshold for SPCC spill
reporting. Note: The basic oil discharge reporting requirements for 40 CFR 110 (spills
reportable to the National Response Center) did not change.
The period in which an owner or operator is required to review and evaluate the SPCC
Plan is now five years. The review and evaluation must be documented, and a
statement must be signed stating whether or not the Plan will be amended. Note: The
review and evaluation do not require a Professional Engineer (PE) certification.
However, any technical changes to the Plan do require a PE certification.
Change from 1974 rule: The review period was previously three years
The Plan must be in writing, and if the Plan does not follow the sequence specified in
the rule, an equivalent plan and a cross-reference must be provided. For example, the
owner/operator may use an Integrated Contingency Plan (ICP) or an equivalent state
plan that includes all applicable SPCC requirements with a cross-reference.
Change from 1974 rule: No direct counterpart for alternative plan formats in the 1 974
rule.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
C-2
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
                                           Appendix C: Summary of Revised Rule Provisions
Citation
Spill History
Previously
§112.7(a)
Environmental
Equivalence
§112.7(a)(2)
Facility Diagram
§112.7(8X3)
Information for Use
in a Discharge
§112.7(8X3)
Information for Use
in a Discharge
§112.7(a)(4)and
112.7(a)(5)
Secondary
Containment
§112.7(c)
Impracticability
Claim/Integrity
Testing
§112.7(d)
Revised Rule Provision
Spiil history does not need to be reported. Note: Facility Response Plans (FRPs) are
still required to include a spill history.
Change from 1974 rule: The previous rule required a spill history for reportable
discharges, including corrective actions and preventive measures for spills occurring
before the effective date of the 1 974 rule. This requirement has been eliminated in the
2002 rule.
Where a facility does not conform with SPCC provisions, the owner or operator must
state the reason for nonconformance and describe, in detail, alternate methods to
achieve equivalent environmental protection. Note: This weaver does not apply to any
secondary containment requirements.
Change from 1974 rule: No direct counterpart in the 1974 rule.
The facility is required to prepare a facility diagram that includes the location and
contents of containers, transfer stations, and connecting pipes. The facility diagram
must also include exempt USTs.
Change from 1974 rule: No direct counterpart in the 1974 rule.
The owner or operator must provide, in the Plan, information and procedures relating
to basic spill prevention, reporting (contact list with phone numbers), and response.
The specific information is listed in the rule text. Note: This subparagraph applies to all
facilities.
Change from 1974 rule: No direct counterpart in the 1974 rule.
Unless the facility has submitted a response plan under §112.20, the owner or operator
must provide, in the Plan, information and procedures to enable a person reporting a
discharge to relate the necessary information. The plan must have an organization that
will make it readily usable in an emergency. The necessary information is listed in the
rule text.
Change from 1974 rule: No direct counterpart in the 1974 rule.
The entire containment system must be able to contain oil and prevent a discharge
from a primary containment system from escaping the confines of the containment
system before cleanup occurs.
Change from 1974 rule: The new language clarifies the requirement in the previous
rule that containment and/or diversionary structures must "prevent discharged oil from
reaching a navigable water course."
When it is not practicable to install secondary containment, the owner/operator must
clearly explain why, and for bulk storage containers, conduct both periodic integrity
testing of the containers and periodic integrity and leak testing of the valves and piping.
Wore: Facilities must still prepare an oil spill contingency plan following 40 CFR part
109 and a have written commitment of resources to respond to and clean up a
discharge.
Change from 1974 rule: The previous rule did not require integrity testing or leak
testing if an impracticability claim was made for secondary containment for bulk
storage containers.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
C-3
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
Citation
Business Records
§§112.7(e)and
112.8(c)(6)
Employee Training
§112.7(f)
Brittle Fracture
Evaluation
§112.7(i)
Secondary
Containment
Onshore facilities
§112.8(c)(2)
Onshore production
facilities
§112.9(0(2)
Integrity Testing per
Industry Standards
§112.8(c)(6)
Cathodlc Protection
§112.8(d)(1)
Reorganization/
Plain Language
Format
Revised Rule Provision
An owner or operator may use usual and customary business records to satisfy the
recordkeeping requirements for inspections and tests. Written procedures and a
record of inspections and tests must be maintained for three years.
Change from 1974 rule: Previously, the rule required maintenance of a record of
inspections and tests for three years but did not allow for the use of usual and
customary business records.
Training is required for oil-handling personnel, and the revised rule supplies additional
topics for this training. Discharge prevention briefings must be conducted at least once
a year.
Change from 1974 rule: The revised rule requires training only for oil-handling
personnel and not for all employees. It also clarifies that briefings must be conducted
once a year, instead of intervals "frequent enough to assure adequate understanding
of the SPCC Plan for that facility."
The rule requires evaluations for field-constructed aboveground storage containers
undergoing repair, alteration, reconstruction, or a change in service.
Change from 1974 rule: No direct counterpart in the 1974 rule.
Onshore facilities (including production facilities) must ensure that secondary
containment has sufficient freeboard to allow for precipitation. Whatever method used
must be documented in the Plan.
Change from 1974 rule: Onshore facilities were required to provide sufficient
freeboard to allow for precipitation, though the previous rule did not specify that an
allowance for precipitation was required for production facilities.
Facilities must test aboveground containers for integrity on a regular schedule, and
whenever material repairs are made. Testing must combine visual inspection with
another non-destructive shell thickness testing technique. A list of organizations that
may be helpful in the identification and explanation of industry standards is included In
the rule preamble.
Change from 1974 rule: Previously, the rule stated that integrity testing should occur
periodically and did not require the combination of a visual inspection with another non-
destructive shell thickness testing technique.
All buried piping that is installed or replaced on or after August 16, 2002, must have
protective wrapping and coating as well as cathodic protection, for all soil conditions.
Note: A facility can also satisfy the corrosion protection provisions through 40 CFR part
280 or a state program approved under 40 CFR part 281.
Change from 1974 rule: The previous rule required cathodic protection for buried
piping if soil conditions warranted such protection. It did not allow for satisfaction of the
provision through 40 CFR part 280 or a state program approved under 40 CFR part
281.
Included are new sections for different types of facilities and new subparts for different
types of oils in compliance with Edible Oil Regulatory Reform Act (EORRA.) The rule
has been written in a plain language format to make it clearer and easier to use.
Requirements for the SPCC Plan are included in §§112.1 through 112.15.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
C-4
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
                          DISCLAIMER - APPENDIX D

      The sample Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan in Appendix D
is intended to provide examples and illustrations of how a bulk storage facility could address a
variety of scenarios in its SPCC Plan. The "facility" is not an actual facility, nor does it represent
any actual facility or company.  Rather, EPA is providing illustrative examples of the type and
amount of information that is appropriate SPCC Plan language for these hypothetical situations.

      Because the SPCC rule is designed to give each facility owner/operator the flexibility to
tailor the facility's SPCC Plan to the facility's circumstances, this sample SPCC Plan is not a
template to be adopted by a facility; doing so does not mean that the facility will be in
compliance with the SPCC rule requirements. Nor is the sample plan a template that must be
followed in order for the facility to be considered in compliance with the SPCC rule.
                                                                       Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
SPILL PREVENTION, CONTROL, AND COUNTERMEASURE PLAN
                     Unified Oil Company
                        123 A Street
                Stonefield, Massachusetts 02000
                       May 12, 2003
                        Prepared by
                  Poppins & Associates, Inc.
             Clearwater Falls, Massachusetts, 02210
                                                       Version 10. 11/28/2005

-------
 Unified Oil Company, Ltd.
SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
                         TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction
Part 1: Plan Administration
1.1 Management Approval and Designated Person
1.2 Professional Engineer Certification
1.3 Location of SPCC Plan
1.4 Plan Review
1.5 Facilities, Procedures, Methods, or Equipment Not Yet Fully Operational
1.6 Cross-Reference with SPCC Provisions
Part 2: General Facility Information
2.1  Facility Description
2.2  Evaluation of Discharge Potential
Part 3: Discharge Prevention - General SPCC Provisions
3.1 Compliance with Applicable Requirements
3.2 Facility Layout Diagram
3.3 Spill Reporting
3.4 Potential Discharge Volumes and Direction of Flow
3.5 Containment and Diversionary Structures
3.6 Practicability of Secondary Containment
3.7 Inspections, Tests, and Records
3.8 Personnel, Training, and Discharge Prevention Procedures
3,9 Security
3.10 Tank Truck Loading/Unloading Rack Requirements
3.11 Brittle Fracture Evaluation
3.12 Conformance with State and Local Applicable Requirements
Part 4: Discharge Prevention - SPCC Provisions for Onshore Facilities
(Excluding Production Facilities)
4.1 Facility Drainage
4.2 Bulk Storage Containers
4.3 Transfer Operations, Pumping,  and In-Plant Processes
                                                   Page
                                                       1

                                                       3
                                                       3
                                                       4
                                                       4
                                                       5
                                                       5

                                                       8
                                                     11

                                                     12
                                                     12
                                                     12
                                                     13
                                                     14
                                                     16
                                                     16
                                                     18
                                                     19
                                                     19
                                                     22
                                                     22
                                                     23
                                                     23
                                                     29
                                                                     Version 10. 11/28/2005

-------
 Unified Oil Company, Ltd.	SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan

Part 5: Discharge Response
5.1 Response to a Minor Discharge                                                   30
5.2 Response to a Major Discharge                                                   31
5.3 Waste Disposal                                                                 32
5.4 Discharge Notification                                                            32
5.5 Cleanup Contractors and Equipment Suppliers                                      33

List of Tables
Table 1-1: Plan Review Log                                                           6
Table 1-2: SPCC Cross-Reference                                                     7
Table 2-1: Oil Containers                                                             9
Table 2-2: OH Discharge  History                                                      10
Table 3-1: Potential Discharge Volume and Direction of Flow                             13
Table 3-2: Inspection and Testing Program                                             16
Table 3-3: Fuel Transfer  Procedures                                                   21
Table 4-1: List of Oil Containers                                                      24
Table 4-2: Scope and Frequency of Bulk Storage Containers Inspections and Tests         27

Appendices
A: Site Plan and Facility Diagram
B: Substantial Harm Determination
C: Facility Inspection Checklists
D: Record of Containment Dike Drainage
E: Record of Discharge Prevention Briefings and Training
F: Calculation of Secondary Containment Capacity
G: Records of Tank Integrity and Pressure Tests
H: Emergency Contacts
I: Discharge Notification Form
J: Discharge Response Equipment Inventory
K: Agency Notification Standard Report
                                                                        Version 1.0. 11/28/2005

-------
Unified Oil Company, Ltd.
SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
         LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

          AST        Aboveground Storage Tank
          EPA        U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
          MADEP     Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
          NPDES     National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
          PE         Professional Engineer
          POTW Publicly Owned Treatment Works
          SPCC       Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure
          STI         Steel Tank Institute
          UST        Underground Storage Tank
                                   -IV-
                                                              Version 10. 11/28/2005

-------
 Unified Oil Company, Ltd.
SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
                               INTRODUCTION
Purpose
       The purpose of this Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure {SPCC) Plan is to
describe measures implemented by Unified Oil to prevent oil discharges from occurring, and to
prepare Unified Oil to respond in a safe, effective, and timely manner to mitigate the impacts of
a discharge.

       This Plan has been prepared to meet the requirements of Title 40, Code of Federal
Regulations, Part 112 (40 CFR part 112), and supercedes the earlier Plan developed to meet
provisions in effect since 1974.

       In addition to fulfilling requirements of 40 CFR part 112, this SPCC Plan is used as a
reference for oil storage information and testing records, as a tool to  communicate practices on
preventing and responding to discharges with employees, as a guide to facility inspections, and
as a resource during emergency response.

       Unified Oil  management has determined that this facility does not pose a risk of
substantial harm under 40 CFR part 112, as recorded in the "Substantial Harm Determination"
included in Appendix B of this Plan.

       This Plan provides guidance on key actions that Unified Oil must perform to comply with
the SPCC rule:

       Q     Complete monthly and annual site inspections as outlined in the Inspection,
             Tests, and Records section of this Plan (Section 3.7) using the inspection
             checklists included in Appendix C.

       Q     Perform preventive maintenance of equipment, secondary containment systems,
             and discharge prevention systems described in this Plan as needed to keep them
             in proper operating conditions.

       Q     Conduct annual employee training as outlined in the Personnel, Training, and
             Spill Prevention Procedures section of this Plan (Section 3.8)  and document
             them on the log  included in Appendix E.

       Q     If either of the following occurs, submit the SPCC Plan to the EPA Region 1
             Regional Administrator (RA) and the Massachusetts Department of
             Environmental Protection (MADEP), along with other information as detailed in
             Section 5.4 of this Plan:

             Q    The facility discharges more than 1,000 gallons of oil into or upon the
                    navigable waters of the U.S. or adjoining shorelines in a single spill event;
                   or
                                         -1-
                                                                       Version 10. 11/28/2005

-------
Unified Oil Company, Ltd.
SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
            Q     The facility discharges oil in quantity greater than 42 gallons in each of
                   two spill events within any 12-month period.

            Review the SPCC Plan at least once every five (5) years and amend it to include
            more effective prevention and control technology, if such technology will
            significantly reduce the likelihood of a spill event and has been proven effective
            in the field at the time of the review. Plan amendments, other than administrative
            changes discussed above, must be recertified by a Professional Engineer on the
            certification page in Section 1.2 of this Plan.

            Amend the SPCC Plan within six (6) months whenever where is a change in
            facility design, construction, operation, or maintenance that materially affects the
            facility's spill potential. The revised Plan must be recertified by a Professional
            Engineer (PE).

            Review the Plan on an annual basis. Update the Plan to reflect any
            "administrative changes" that are applicable, such as personnel changes or
            revisions to contact information, such as phone numbers. Administrative changes
            must be documented in the Plan review log of Section 1.4 of this Plan, but do not
            have to be certified by a PE.
                                          -2-
                                                                         Version 1.0. 11/28/2005

-------
 Unified Oil Company, Ltd.
SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
                       Part 1: Plan Administration
1.1    Management Approval and Designated Person (40 CFR 112.7)

Unified Oil Company ("Unified Oil') is committed to preventing discharges of oil to navigable
waters and the environment, and to maintaining the highest standards for spill prevention
control and countermeasures through the implementation and regular review and amendment to
the Plan. This SPCC Plan has the full approval of Unified Oil management. Unified Oil has
committed the necessary resources to implement the measures described in this Plan.

The Facility Manager is the Designated Person Accountable for Oil Spill Prevention at the
facility and has the authority to commit the necessary resources to implement this Plan.

Authorized Facility Representative (facility response coordinator):  Susan Blake
                                Signature:                        kuuvn, (BloL
                                Title:                            Facility Manager
                                Date:                            May 12, 2003
1.2    Professional Engineer Certification (40 CFR 112.3(d))

The undersigned Registered Professional Engineer is familiar with the requirements of Part 112
of Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR part 112) and has visited and examined
the facility, or has supervised examination of the facility by appropriately qualified personnel.
The undersigned Registered Professional Engineer attests that this Spill Prevention, Control,
and Countermeasure Plan has been prepared in accordance with good engineering practice,
including consideration of applicable industry standards and the requirements of 40 CFR part
112; that procedures for required inspections and testing have been established; and that this
Plan is adequate for the facility. [40 CFR 112.3(d)]

This certification in no way relieves the owner or operator of the facility of his/her duty to prepare
and fully implement this SPCC Plan in accordance with the requirements of 40 CFR part 112.
This Plan is valid only to the extent that the facility owner or operator maintains, tests, and
inspects equipment, containment, and other devices as prescribed in this Plan.
       Signature

       Julie Andrews
       Name

       Poppins and Associates
       Company
                  90535055, Massachusetts
                  Professional Engineer Registration Number
                  Sr Process Engineer
                  Title

                  May 12, 2003
                  Date
                                         -3-
   PE Seal
     MA
Julie Andrews
 #90535055
                                                                      Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
 Unified Oil Company, Ltd.
SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
1.3    Location of SPCC Plan (40 CFR112.3(e))

In accordance with 40 CFR 112.3(e), a complete copy of this SPCC Plan is maintained at the
facility in the office building. The front office is attended whenever the facility is operating, i.e.,
7:00 AM to 5:00 PM, 6 days per week (closed on Sundays).

1.4    Plan Review (40 CFR 112.3 and 112.5)

1.4.1   Changes in Facility Configuration

In accordance with 40 CFR 112.5(a), Unified Oil periodically reviews and evaluates this SPCC
Plan for any change in the facility design, construction, operation, or maintenance that
materially affects the facility's potential for an oil discharge, including, but not limited to:

             commissioning of containers;
       »      reconstruction, replacement, or installation of piping systems;
             construction or demolition that might alter secondary containment structures; or
       »      changes of product or service,  revisions to standard operation, modification of
             testing/inspection procedures, and use of new or modified industry standards or
             maintenance procedures.

Amendments to the Plan made to address changes of this nature are referred to as technical
amendments, and must be certified by a PE. Non-technical amendments can be done {and
must be documented in this section) by the facility owner and/or operator. Non-technical
amendments include the following:

             change in the name or contact information {i.e., telephone numbers) of
             individuals responsible for the implementation of this Plan; or
       »      change in the name or contact information of spill response or cleanup
             contractors.

Unified Oil must make the needed revisions to the SPCC Plan as soon as possible, but no later
than six months after the change occurs. The Plan must be implemented as soon as possible
following any technical amendment, but no later than six months from the date of the
amendment. The Facility Manager is responsible for initiating and coordinating revisions to the
SPCC Plan.

1.4.2   Scheduled Plan  Reviews

In accordance with 40 CFR 112.5(b), Unified Oil reviews this SPCC Plan at least once every
five years (in the past, such reviews were required every three years). Revisions to the Plan, if
needed, are made within six months of the five-year  review. A registered Professional Engineer
certifies any technical amendment to the Plan, as described above, in accordance with 40 CFR
112.3(d). The last SPCC review occurred on May 13, 2001. This Plan is dated May 12, 2003.
The next plan review is therefore scheduled to take place on or prior to May 12, 2008.
                                         -4-
                                                                       Version 10, 11/28/2005

-------
 Unified Oil Company, Ltd.	SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan

1.4.3   Record of Plan Reviews

Scheduled reviews and Plan amendments are recorded in the Plan Review Log (Table 1-1).
This log must be completed even if no amendment is made to the Plan as a result of the review.
Unless a technical or administrative change prompts an earlier review of the Plan, the next
scheduled review of this Plan must occur by May 12, 2008,

1.5    Facilities, Procedures, Methods, or Equipment Not Yet Fully
       Operational (40 CFR 112.7)

Bulk storage containers at this facility have never been tested for integrity  since their installation
in 1989. Section 4.2.6 of this Plan describes the inspection program to be  implemented by the
facility following a regular schedule, including the dates by which each of the bulk storage
containers must be tested.

1.6    Cross-Reference with SPCC Provisions (40 CFR 112.7)

This SPCC Plan does not follow the exact order presented in 40 CFR part 112. Section
headings identify, where appropriate, the relevant section(s) of the SPCC  rule. Table 1-2
presents a cross-reference of Plan sections relative to applicable parts of 40 CFR part 112.
                                        -5-                            Version 1.0. 11/28/2005

-------
 Unified Oil Company, Ltd.      SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
                               Table 1-1: Plan Review Log

;"f^:By:. .
Mike Davies


Mike Davies

Mike Davies


Susan Blake

Susan Blake

Susan Blake

Susan Blake



Date Activity
5/20/1989 Prepare Plan
Start of
Operations
5/18/1992 Scheduled
review
2/18/1994 Plan
amendment

5/15/1995 Scheduled
review
5/15/1998 Scheduled
review
5/13/2001 Scheduled
review
5/12/2003 Periodic review
due to physical
change
certification
required? Comments
Yes Initial SPCC Plan.


No No change.








Yes* Changes to inspection procedures,
addition of a new tank, full review not
conducted.
No Change in responsible individual
contact information.
No No change.

No No change.

Yes* Installation of oil/water separator



and








' Previous PE certifications of this Plan are summarized below.
-:xv :Bate. :
2/18/1994
5/12/2003
Scope
Addition of new tank and changes in
inspection procedures.
Installation of oil/water separator
PEName
Chris Ebert
Julie Andrews
Licensing State and
• Registration No.
MA, 90117823
MA, 905350055
                                            -6-
                                                                             VersionlO, 11/28/2005

-------
  Unified Oil Company, Ltd.
SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
                             Table 1-2: SPCC Cross-Reference
provision
112.3(d)
112.3
112.8(c)(3)
112.8(c)(4)
112.8(c)(5)
112.8(c)(6)
112.8(c){7)
112.8(c)(8)
112.8(c)(9)
112.8(0(10)
112.8(0(11)
112.8(d)
112.20(6)
.: ••••':":-::;::-' •' • Plan Section . •.:-.'• '.\'\'\ •:'•::• :~
Professional Engineer Certification
Location o* SPCC Plan
Plan Review
Management Approval
Cross-Reference with SPCC Rule
Part 2: General Facility Information
Appendix A: Site Plan and Facility Diagram
5.4 Discharge Notification
Part 5: Discharge Response
3.4 Potential Discharge Volumes and Direction of Flow
3.5 Containment and Diversionary Structures
3.6 Practicability of Secondary Containment
3.7 Inspections, Tests, and Records
3.8 Personnel, Training and Discharge Prevention Procedures
3.9 Security
3.10 Tank Truck Loading/Unloading
3.11 Brittle Fracture Evaluation
3.12 Conformance with Applicable State and Local Requirements
4.1 Facility Drainage
4.2.1 Construction
4.2.2 Secondary Containment
4.2.3 Drainage of Diked Areas
4.2.4 Corrosion Protection
4.2.5 Partially Buried and Bunkered Storage Tanks
4.2.6 Inspection
Appendix B - Facility Inspection Checklists
4.2.7 Heating Coils
4.2.8 Overfill Prevention System
4.2.9 Effluent Treatment Facilities
4.2.10 Visible Discharges
4.2.11 Mobile and Portable Containers
4.3 Transfer Operations, Pumping and In-Plant Processes
Certification of Substantial Harm Determination
•: :: Pag*:—:
3
4
4
Table 1-1
3
Table 1-2
8
Appendix A
32
Appendix I
Appendix K
32
13
14
16
16
Appendix B
18
19
19
22
22
23
23
25
26
Appendix D
26
26
26
Appendix C
27
27
28
28
28
29
Appendix B
* Only selected excerpts of relevant rule text are provided. For a complete list of SPCC requirements, refer
to the full text of 40 CFR part 112.
                                             -7-
                                                                             Versionl.O, 11/28/2005

-------
 Unified Oil Company, Ltd.
 SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
                  Part 2: General  Facility Information
Name:

Address:




Type:

Date of Initial Operations:

Owner/Operator:




Primary contact:
Unified Oil Company

123 A Street
Stonefield, MA 02000
(781)555-5556

Bulk storage distribution facility

May 20, 1989

Blake and Daughters, Inc.
20 Fairview Road
Stonefield, MA 02000

Susan Blake, Facility Manager
Work:        (781)555-5550
Cell (24 hours): (781) 555-5559
2.1    Facility Description (40 CFR112.7(a)(3))

2.1.1   Location and Activities

Unified Oil distributes a variety of petroleum products to primarily commercial customers. The
facility handles, stores, uses, and distributes petroleum products in the form of gasoline, diesel,
No. 2 fuel oil, No. 6 fuel oil, and motor oil. Unified Oil receives products by common carrier via
tanker truck. The products are stored in several aboveground storage tanks (ASTs) and in one
underground storage tank (UST). They are delivered to customers by Unified Oil trucks or by
independent contractors. The facility refuels its own two delivery trucks from an underground
diesel tank connected to a fueling pump.

Hours of operation are between 7:00 AM and 5:00 PM, 6 days per week. Personnel at the
facility include a facility manager, a plant operator, two truck drivers, an office administrator, and
three operations and maintenance personnel.

The Site Plan and Facility Diagram included in Appendix A of this Plan show the location and
layout of the facility. The Facility Diagram (Figure A-2) shows the location of oil containers,
buildings, loading/unloading and transfer areas, and critical spill control structures.

Unified Oil is located in a primarily commercial area at 123 A Street in Stonefield,
Massachusetts. The site is comprised of approximately 2 acres of land and is bordered to the
east by A Street, to the west by Silver Creek, and to the north by ABC Plating Co.
                                          -8-
                                                                         Versionl.O, 11/28/2005

-------
 Unified Oil Company, Ltd.       SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan

The site includes an office building, a maintenance shop, a tanker truck loading rack and
unloading area, and product storage and handling areas. Petroleum products are stored within
the main bulk storage area, underground, and inside the maintenance building.

2.1.2  Oil Storage

Oil storage at the facility consists of seven tanks: four fixed ASTs, one portable tank, and two
metallic USTs.  In addition, the facility stores a varying stock of oil drums inside the maintenance
building.

The capacities  of oil containers present at the site are listed below and are also indicated on the
facility diagram in Figure A-2. All containers with capacity of 55 gallons or more are included.
The capacity of the oil/water separator is not included in the total storage capacity for the facility
since it is used to treat storm water and as a means of secondary containment for areas of the
facility with potential for an oil discharge outside dikes or berms.

Unified Oil owns two 2,000-gallon transport trucks that are used to deliver product to customers.
One of the two trucks is periodically parked overnight while full; the capacity of this truck is
therefore counted in the total storage capacity for this facility.

                                 Table 2-1: Oil Containers
  m

 Fixed Storage

 1     20,000 gallons

 2     20,000 gallons


 3     20,000 gallons


 6     1,000 gallons

 7     10,000 gallons

       1,100 gallons


 Portable storage

 4     500 gallons

 Vehicles

       2,000 gallons
Diesel

Unleaded regular gasoline
Aboveground vertical tank

Aboveground horizontal tank elevated on
built-in saddles
Unleaded premium gasoline   Aboveground horizontal tank elevated on
                           built-in saddles
No. 2 fuel oil

No. 6 fuel oil

Motor oil
Gasoline
Fuel oil
Underground horizontal tank

Field-constructed aboveground vertical tank

55-gallon storage drums (variable stock; up
to 20 drums on site at any time)



Double-walled aboveground horizontal tank



Delivery truck*	
       * Note: Unified Oil owns two delivery trucks. Both trucks are used in transportation-
       related activities outside the confines of the facility and generally return to the facility
                                            -9-
                                                                            Version 10,11/28/2005

-------
  Unified Oil Company, Ltd.
        SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
       empty for parking overnight.  One of the two delivery trucks is periodically parked while
       full. This truck is therefore counted in the storage capacity for this facility. The other truck
       is dedicated to scheduled deliveries and returns to the facility empty (except for minor
       residual). If the tanker truck returns to the facility with more than residual product, this
       product will be returned to inventory via the unloading station. If the facility decides to
       use this tanker for overnight storage,  then this Plan must be modified to include the
       capacity of the truck and ensure compliance with other rule requirements, including
       secondary containment.
jTotal Oil Storage:

Other containers:
74,600 gallons

(1) 1,500-gallon oil/water separator

Note: The oil/water separator is used treat facility drainage (i.e.,
wastewater) prior to discharge into Silver Creek under state and federal
wastewater discharge permits.  Discharge  from the facility includes storm
water collected from the paved areas outside the loading rack/unloading
area containment berm and bulk storage containment dike. No external
oil tanks are associated with the oil/water separator. This equipment is
used to meet certain secondary containment requirements under 40 CFR
part 112, as described later in this Plan. Thus, the capacity of the
oil/water separator is not counted towards the facility total storage
capacity.

(1) 5,000-gallon underground horizontal tank (Diesel) - Tank #5

Note: This underground storage tank is subject to,  and meets, all the
technical requirements of Massachusetts Underground Storage Tank
Program at 527 CMR 9, as approved under 40 CFR part 281, and is
therefore not counted in the storage capacity for this facility (exempted
under 40 CFR 112.1(d)(4). Its location is indicated on the Facility Diagram
in Appendix A. Note that the other underground storage tank (Tank #6)
which contains No. 2 fuel oil for heating consumption on the premises of
the facility is not subject to certain technical requirements under 40 CFR
part 280 or a program approved under part 281,  in particular corrosion
protection, and is therefore included in the storage capacity for this facility
(and is SPCC-regulated), as described above.
                                           -10-
                                                                           Version 10.11/28/2005

-------
  Unified Oil Company, Ltd.
SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
2.2   Evaluation of Discharge Potential

2.2.1  Distance to Navigable Waters and Adjoining Shorelines and Flow Paths

The facility is located on relatively level terrain. Drainage generally flows in the direction of Silver
Creek, which runs immediately along the southwest side of the site. Silver Creek flows north to
the Blackpool River approximately 1.5  miles from the facility. Spilt trajectories are indicated on
the facility diagram. Storm drains are located along A Street at the northeast end of the site.
They discharge to Silver Creek.

Approximately three-quarters of the facility's ground surface area is paved with asphalt. The
remainder consists of compacted gravel, grass, and low-lying vegetation.

2.2.2  Discharge History

Table 2-1 summarizes the facility's discharge history.

	Table 2-2: Oil Discharge History	
    Description of Discharge

 On 3/23/2003, a leaking valve
 on a delivery truck discharged
 50 gallons of diesel oil onto the
 ground during a rain event,
 allowing approximately 10
 gallpnsjo enter Silver Creek.
    Corrective Actions Taken

  A boom was placed into Silver
  Creek immediately upon
  discovery. Approximately 35
  gallons of oil were recovered
  from Silver creek and the facility
  ground.	
     Plan for Preventing
         Recurrence

An oil/water separator was
installed and the facility
drainage was designed to flow
into the separator.
                                           -11-
                                                                            VersionlO, 11/28/2005

-------
 Unified Oil Company, Ltd.
SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
 PART 3: Discharge Prevention - General SPCC Provisions

The following measures are implemented to prevent oil discharges during the handling, use, or
transfer of oil products at the facility. Oil-handling employees have received training in the
proper implementation of these measures.

3.1    Compliance with Applicable Requirements (40 CFR 112.7(a)(2))

This facility uses an oil/water separator as part of its drainage system to contain oil discharged
in certain areas of the facility (i.e., overfills, and the loading/unloading area associated with Tank
#4). Because Tank #4 does not meet the specifications provided in EPA's memorandum
concerning its policy on double-walled tanks, general containment must be provided to address
overfills. The separator provides environmental protection equivalent to the requirements under
112.8(b)(3) to use ponds, lagoons, or catchment basins to retain oil at the facility in the event of
an uncontrolled discharge. As described in Section 3.5 of this Plan, the operational and
emergency oil storage capacity of the oil/water separator is sufficient to handle the quantity of
oil expected  to be discharged in undiked areas from tank overfills or transfer operations.

Non-destructive integrity evaluation is not performed on Tank #4 (500-gallon portable storage
tank) or the 55-gallon storage drums. Tank #4 has a double-wall construction and is elevated off
the ground. The tank is inspected regularly and following a regular schedule in accordance with
the Steel Tank Institute (STI) SP-001 tank inspection standard as described in this Plan. Any
leakage from the primary container would be detected through monitoring of the interstitial
space performed on a monthly basis. Any leakage from the secondary shell would be detected
visually during scheduled visual inspections by facility personnel. Storage drums are elevated
on spill pallets and have all sides visible, and any leak would be readily detected by facility
personnel before they can cause a discharge to navigable waters or adjoining shorelines.
Corrosion poses minimal risk of failure since drums are single-use and  remain on site for a
relatively short period of time (less than one year). The drum storage area is inspected monthly.
This is in accordance with accepted industry practice for drum storage and provides an effective
means of verifying container integrity, as noted by EPA in the preamble to the SPCC rule at
67 FR 47120.

3.2    Facility Layout Diagram (40 CFR 112.7(a)(3))

Figure A-1 in Appendix A shows the general location of the facility on a U.S. Geological Survey
topographic  map. Figure A-2 in Appendix A presents a layout of the facility and the location of
storage tanks and drums. The diagram also shows the location of storm water drain inlets and
the direction of surface water runoff. As required under 40 CFR 112.7(a)(3), the facility diagram
indicates the location and content of ASTs, USTs, and transfer stations and connecting piping.

3.3    Spill Reporting (40 CFR 112.7(a)(4))

The discharge notification form included in Appendix I will be completed upon immediate
detection of  a discharge and prior to reporting a spill to the proper notification contacts.
                                         -12-
                                                                       Versionl.O, 11/28/2005

-------
 Unified Oil Company, Ltd.
SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
3.4    Potential Discharge Volumes and Direction of Flow (40 CFR 112.7(b))

Table 3-1 presents expected volume, discharge rate, general direction of flow in the event of
equipment failure, and means of secondary containment for different parts of the facility where
oil is stored, used, or handled.

             Table 3-1: Potential Discharge Volumes and Direction of Flow



Potential Event
r Maximum
volume
released
(gallons)


Maximum
discharge rate



Direction of Flow
Bulk Storage Area (Aboveground Storage Tanks #1 , 2, 3, or 7)
Failure of aboveground tank (collapse
sr puncture below product level)
Tank overfill
Pipe failure
Leaking pipe or valve packing
Leaking heating coil (Tank #7)
Loading Rack/Unloading Area
Tank truck leak or failure inside the
•ollover berm

Tank truck leak or failure outside the
rollover berm

Hose leak during truck loading
Fuel Dispensing Areas
Tank #4 and diesel dispenser hose/
connections leak



Maintenance Building
Leak or failure of drum


Other Areas
20,000

1 to 120
20,000
600
10,000
Gradual to
instantaneous
60 gal/mi n
SWto Silver Creek

SWto Silver Creek
240 gat/min ' SW to Silver Creek
1 gal/min ! SWto Silver Creek
1 gal/min SWto Silver Creek


Secondary
Containment

Concrete dike

Concrete dike
Concrete dike
Concrete dike
Concrete dike

1 to 2,000


1 to 2.000


1 to 300
Gradual to
instantaneous

Gradual to
SWto Silver Creek


SW to Silver Creek
instantaneous \

Rollover berm,
on to oil/water
separator
Rollover berm,
on to oil/water
separator
60 gal/min SW to Silver Creek : Rollover berm

1 to 150




30 gal/minute


SWto Silver Creek.


\


1 to 55


Gradual to
instantaneous


Land-based spill
response
capability (spill
kit) and oil/water
separator

SW to Silver Creek, i Spill pallets,



Complete failure of portable tank 500
(Tank #4)

Leaking portable tank or overfills
(Tank #4}


1 to 100


Gradual to I SW to Silver Creek.
instantaneous j

3 gal/min SW to Silver Creek.




oil/water
separator

Secondary shell,
oil/water
separator
Secondary shell,
oil/water
separator
                                        -13-
                                                                      Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
 Unified Oil Company, Ltd.
SAMPLE  Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
Potential Event
Leak during transfer to heating fuel
UST (Tank # 6)
Oil/water separator malfunction
Maximum
volume
released
(gallons)
1 to 120
1 to 300
Maximum
discharge rate
60 gal/min
1 gal/min
Direction of Flow
SW to Silver Creek.
SW to Silver Creek.
Secondary
Containment
Oil/water
separator

3.5    Containment and Diversionary Structures (40 CFR 112.7(c))

Methods of secondary containment at this facility include a combination of structures (e.g., dike,
berm, built-in secondary containment), drainage systems (e.g., oil/water separator), and land-
based spill response (e.g., drain covers, sorbents) to prevent oil from reaching navigable waters
and adjoining shorelines:

»•      For bulk storage containers (refer to Section 4,2.2 of this Plan):

             »      Dike. A concrete dike enclosure is provided around fixed aboveground
                    storage tanks, as described in Section 4.2.2 of this Plan.

             »      Double-wall tank construction. Tank #6 (UST), and the 500-gallon
                    portable storage tank (Tank #4) both have double-wall design with a
                    secondary shell designed to contain 110 percent of the inner shell
                    capacity. The portable tank is generally located near the entrance to the
                    maintenance building; however, it may be used elsewhere on site. It is
                    used to refuel various small pieces of equipment (each less than 55-
                    gallon capacity) such as trucks and compressors, that may be deployed
                    at different areas on the site.

             ••      Spill pallets. Each spill pallet has a  capacity of 75 gallons, which can
                    effectively contain the volume of any single 55-gallon drum. Drums are
                    also stored inside the maintenance building and are not exposed to
                    precipitation. The floor of the maintenance building and lower 24 inches of
                    the outside walls are constructed of poured concrete that would restrict
                    the flow of oil outside the building. The floor has two floor drains; the drain
                    closest to the drum storage area is located 18 feet away. Floor drains flow
                    into the oil/water  separator, which is capable of containing any oil
                    discharged from a 55-gallon drum.

»•      At the loading rack and unloading area (refer to Section 3.10 of this Plan):

             -      Rollover berm. The loading rack/unloading area is surrounded by a 4-
                    inch rollover berm that provides sufficient containment for the largest
                    compartment of the tank truck loading or unloading at the facility (2,000
                    gallons),  and an additional 4 inches of freeboard for precipitation.
                                          -14-
                                                                         VersionVO, 11/28/2005

-------
Unified Oil Company, Ltd.
SAMPLE  Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
      In transfer areas and other parts of the facility where a discharge could occur:

            ••      Drip pans. Fill ports for all ASTs are equipped with drip pans to contain
                   small leaks from the piping/hose connections.

            »      Sorbent material. Spill cleanup kits that include absorbent material,
                   booms, and other portable barriers are located inside the maintenance
                   building near the drummed oil storage area and in an outside shed
                   located near the loading rack/unloading area, as shown on the Facility
                   Diagram in Appendix A. The spill kits are located within close proximity of
                   the oil product storage and handling areas for rapid deployment should a
                   spill occur. Sorbent material, booms, and other portable barriers are
                   stored in the shed next to the loading rack/unloading area to allow for
                   quick deployment in the event of a discharge during loading/unloading
                   activities or any other accidental discharge outside the dike or loading
                   rack/unloading area,  such as from tank vehicles entering/leaving the
                   facility or spills associated with the fuel dispenser. The response
                   equipment inventory for the  facility is listed in Appendix J of this Plan. The
                   inventory is checked  monthly to ensure that used material is replenished.

            >      Drainage  system. The facility surface drainage is engineered to direct oil
                   that may be discharged outside of engineered containment structures
                   such as dikes or berms into the oil/water separator.

                   Oil/water  separator. The oil/water separator is designed to separate and
                   retain oil at the facility. The oil/water separator has a total capacity for
                   oil/water mixture of 1,500 gallons and a design flow rate of 150 gallons
                   per minute. The separator outlet valve can be closed  in the event of a
                   large discharge (greater than 300 gallons) to provide additional
                   emergency containment of up to 1,200 gallons. The maximum amount of
                   oil potentially discharged outside the diked or bermed areas is estimated
                   at roughly 2,000 gallons (from the complete failure of an on-site tanker
                   truck). A spill of this volume outside the diked or bermed areas will be
                   primarily contained by deploying sorbent  material and other portable spill
                   barriers upon discovery of the spill,  and additional oil  containment
                   capacity will be provided by the oil/water separator. The operating oil
                   storage capacity is 300 gallons. Best Management Practices are used to
                   minimize the amount of solids and oil that flow into the oil/water
                   separator. Facility personnel are instructed to avoid and address small
                   spills using sorbents to minimize runoff of oil into the oil/water separator.
                   The oil/water separator is inspected monthly as part of the scheduled
                   inspection to check the level of water within the separator and measure
                   the depth  of bottom sludges and floating oils. Floating oil is removed by a
                   licensed waste collector when it reaches a thickness of 2 inches.
                                         -15-
                                                                        Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
 Unified Oil Company, Ltd.
         SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
3.6    Practicability of Secondary Containment (40 CFR 112.7(d))

Unified Oil management has determined that secondary containment is practicable at this
facility.

3.7    Inspections, Tests, and Records (40 CFR 112.7(e))

As required by the SPCC rule, Unified Oil performs the inspections, tests, and evaluations listed
in the following table. Table 3-2 summarizes the various types of inspections and tests
performed at the facility. The inspections and tests are described later in this section, and in the
respective sections that describe different parts of the facility (e.g., Section 4.2.6 for bulk
storage containers).

	Table 3-2; Inspection and Testing Program	___
       Facility
    Component
             Action
      Frequency/Circumstances
 Aboveground
 container
 Container supports
 and foundation
 Liquid level sensing
 devices (overfill)

 Diked area
 Lowermost drain
 and all outlets of
 tank truck

 Effluent treatment
 facilities

 AH aboveground
 valves, piping, and
 appurtenances
Test container integrity. Combine
visual inspection with another testing
technique (non-destructive shell
testing). Inspect outside of container
for signs of deterioration and
discharges.

Inspect container's supports and
foundations.
Test for proper operation.
Inspect for signs of deterioration,
discharges, or accumulation of oil
inside diked areas.

Visually inspect content for presence
of oil.

Visually inspect.
Detect possible system upsets that
could cause a discharge.

Assess general condition of items,
such as flange joints, expansion
joints, valve glands and bodies, catch
pans, pipeline supports, locking of
valves, and metal surfaces.
Following a regular schedule (monthly,
annual, and during scheduled inspections)
and whenever material repairs are made.
Following a regular schedule (monthly,
annual, and during scheduled inspections)
and whenever material repairs are made.

Monthly
Monthly



Prior to draining


Prior to filling and departure



Daily, monthly


Monthly
                                           -16-
                                                                            Version 10,11/28/2005

-------
  Unified Oil Company, Ltd.
         SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and Counter-measure (SPCC) Plan
      Facility
    Component
             Action
      Frequency/Circumstances
 Buried metallic
 storage tank

 Buried piping
Leak test.
Inspect for deterioration.
                    Integrity and leak testing.
Annually


Whenever a section of buried line is
exposed for any reason.

At the time of installation, modification,
construction, relocation,  or replacement.
3,7,1   Daily Inspection

A Unified Oil employee performs a complete walk-through of the facility each day. This daily
visual inspection involves: (1) looking for tank/piping damage or leakage, stained or discolored
soils, or excessive accumulation of water in diked and bermed areas; (2) observing the effluent
from the oil/water separator; and (3) verifying that the dike drain valve is securely closed.

3.7.2   Monthly Inspection

The checklist provided in Appendix C is used for monthly inspections by Unified Oil personnel.
The monthly inspections cover the following key elements:

       Q      Observing the exterior of aboveground storage tanks, pipes, and other
              equipment for signs of deterioration, leaks, corrosion, and thinning.
       Q      Observing the exterior of portable containers for signs of deterioration or leaks.
       Q      Observing tank foundations and supports for signs of instability or excessive
              settlement.
       Q      Observing the tank fill and discharge pipes for signs of poor connection that
              could cause a discharge, and tank vent for obstructions and proper operation.
       Q      Verifying the proper functioning of overfill prevention systems.
       Q      Checking the inventory of discharge response equipment and restocking as
              needed.
       Q      Observing the effluent and measuring the quantity of accumulated oil within the
              oil/water separator.

All problems regarding tanks, piping, containment, or response equipment must immediately be
reported to the Facility Manager. Visible oil leaks from tank walls, piping, or other components
must be repaired as soon as possible to prevent a larger spill or a discharge to navigable waters
or adjoining shorelines. Pooled oil is removed immediately upon discovery.

Written monthly inspection records are signed by the Facility Manager and maintained with this
SPCC Plan for a period of three years.
                                          -17-
                                                                          Verston 1.0.11/28/2005

-------
 Unified Oil Company, Ltd.
SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
3,7.3   Annual Inspection

Facility personnel perform a more thorough inspection of facility equipment on an annual basis.
This annual inspection complements the monthly inspection described above and is performed
in June of each year using the checklist provided in Appendix C of this Plan.

The annual Inspection is preferably performed after a large storm event in order to verify the
imperviousness and/or proper functioning of drainage control systems such as the dike, rollover
berm, control valves, and the oil/water separator.

Written annual inspection records are signed by the Facility Manager and maintained with this
SPCC Plan for a period of three years.

3.7.4   Periodic Integrity Testing

In addition to the above monthly and annual inspections by facility personnel, Tanks #1,2, 3,4,
and 7 are periodically evaluated by an outside certified tank inspector following the Steel Tank
Institute (STI) Standard for the Inspection of Aboveground Storage Tanks, SP-001,2005
version, as described in Section 4.2.6 of this Plan.

3.8   Personnel, Training, and Discharge Prevention Procedures
       (40CFR112.7(f))

The Facility Manager is the facility designee and is responsible for oil discharge prevention,
control, and response preparedness activities at this facility.

Unified Oil management has instructed oil-handling facility personnel in the operation and
maintenance of oil pollution prevention  equipment, discharge procedure protocols, applicable
pollution  control laws, rules and regulations, general facility operations, and the content of this
SPCC Plan. Any new facility personnel with oil-handling responsibilities are provided with this
same training prior to being involved in any oil operation.

Annual discharge prevention briefings are held by the Facility Manager for all facility personnel
involved  in oil operations. The briefings are aimed at ensuring continued understanding and
adherence to the discharge prevention  procedures presented in the SPCC Plan. The briefings
also highlight and describe known discharge events or failures, malfunctioning components, and
recently implemented precautionary measures and best practices. Facility operators and other
personnel will have the opportunity during the briefings to  share recommendations concerning
health, safety, and environmental issues encountered during facility operations.

A simulation of an on-site vehicular discharge has been conducted, and future training
exercises will be periodically held to prepare for possible discharge responses.

Records  of the briefings and discharge prevention training are kept on the form shown  in
Appendix E and  maintained with this SPCC Plan for a period of three years.
                                          -18-
                                                                         Versionl.O. 11/28/2005

-------
 Unified Oil Company, Ltd.
SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
3.9    Security (40 CFR 112.7(g)}

The facility is surrounded by 8-ft tal! steel security fencing. The fence encircles the entire
footprint of the facility. The single entrance gate is locked when the facility is unattended.

All drain valves for containment areas are locked in the closed position to prevent unauthorized
opening. Water draw valves on the 20,000-gallon storage tanks are maintained in the closed
position to prevent unauthorized opening via locks. Keys for all locked valves are kept in the
front office.

Two area lights illuminate the loading/unloading and storage areas. Additional motion-activated
lights are placed in other areas of the facility. The lights are placed to allow for the discovery of
discharges and to deter acts of vandalism.

The electrical starter controls for the oil pumps, including the fuel dispenser, are located in a
closet inside the maintenance shop. The closet is locked when the pumps are not in use. The
maintenance shop is locked when the facility is unattended.

The facility securely  caps or blank-flanges the loading/unloading connections of facility piping
when not in service or when in standby service for an extended period of time, or when piping is
emptied of liquid content either by draining or by inert gas pressure.

3.10  Tank Truck Loading/Unloading Rack Requirements (40 CFR 112.7(h))

The potential for discharges during tank truck loading and unloading operations is of particular
concern at this facility. Unified Oil management is committed to ensuring the safe transfer of
material to and from storage tanks. The following measures are implemented to prevent oil
discharges during tank truck loading and  unloading operations.

3.10.1  Secondary Containment (40 CFR 112.7(h)(1))

The facility has both a loading rack (for loading moderate capacity oil delivery tanker trucks) and
an unloading area (where product is unloaded from large capacity tanker truck to the facility
bulk storage tanks).

The loading rack and unloading area are co-located and are used by outside suppliers making
deliveries to the facility and to load Unified Oil delivery trucks.

The tank truck loading rack/unloading area is surrounded with a 4-inch rollover asphalt berm
that provides secondary containment in the event of a discharge during transfer operations. The
secondary containment berm is designed to address the more stringent rack containment
requirements of 40 CFR  112.7(h), which requires that the berm be sufficient to contain the
capacity of the largest compartment, plus freeboard for precipitation. The curbed area provides
a catchment capacity of 2,500 gallons, which is capable of containing the largest compartment
of the petroleum suppliers truck making deliveries at this facility (maximum 2,000 gallons), and
                                         -19-
                                                                         Versionl 0.11/28/2005

-------
 Unified Oil Company, Ltd.
SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
is also capable of containing the capacity of Unified Oil's delivery trucks, which each have a
total capacity of 2,000 gallons.

To minimize direct exposure to rain, and facilitate the cleanup of small spills that may occur
during loading/unloading operations, the area is partially covered by a roof.

The area is graded to direct the flow of oil or water away from the vehicle, and the low point of
the curbed area is fitted with a gate valve that is normally kept closed and locked. The key for
that lock is kept in the main office. The berm is drained by Unified personnel after verifying that
the retained water is free of oil. The accumulated water is  released to the oil/water separator.
The drain  valve is closed and locked following drainage.

Although delivery trucks are usually empty while at the site for extended periods of time, Unified
Oil periodically parks one of its two delivery trucks while full overnight. If a delivery truck is
parked overnight  or for an extended period of time while it still contains fuel, it is parked inside
the loading rack/unloading area containment berm. As discussed above, the berm provides
sufficient containment capacity for the truck volume,  plus sufficient freeboard for 4 inches of
precipitation.

3.10.2 Loading/Unloading Procedures (40 CFR 112.7(h)(2) and (3))

All suppliers must meet the minimum requirements and regulations for tank truck
loading/unloading established by the U.S. Department of Transportation. Unified Oil ensures
that the vendor understands the site layout, knows the protocol for entering the facility and
unloading product, and has the necessary equipment to respond to a discharge from the vehicle
or fuel delivery hose.

The Facility Manager or his/her designee supervises oil deliveries for all new suppliers,  and
periodically observes deliveries for existing, approved suppliers.

All loading and unloading of tank vehicles takes place only in the designated loading
rack/unloading area.

Vehicle filling operations are performed by facility personnel trained in proper discharge
prevention procedures. The truck driver or facility personnel remain with the vehicle at all times
while fuel  is being transferred. Transfer operations are performed according to the minimum
procedures outlined in Table 3-3. This table is also posted next to the  loading/unloading point.
                                           -20-
                                                                           Versionl.0.11^8/2005

-------
Unified Oil Company, Ltd.
              SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
                            Table 3-3; Fuel Transfer Procedures
                                                    tasks
Prior to
loading/
unloading
During
loading/
unloading
Q
Q
Q

J
LI
LI

LI
Q

Q

LI

U
LJ

G
                Q
                Q
                U
                y

After loading/    LJ
unloading       Q
                Q

                Q
                Q
                LI

                U

                LI
                Q
Visually check all hoses for leaks and wet spots.
Verify that sufficient volume (ullage) is available in the storage tank or truck.
Lock in the closed position all drainage valves of the secondary containment
structure.
Secure the tank vehicle with wheel chocks and interlocks.
Ensure that the vehicle's parking brakes are set.
Verify proper alignment of valves and proper functioning of the pumping
system.
If filling a tank truck, inspect the lowermost drain and all outlets.
Establish adequate bonding/grounding prior to connecting to the fuel transfer
point.
Turn off cell phone.

Driver must stay  with the vehicle at all times during loading/unloading
activities.
Periodically inspect all systems, hoses and  connections.
When loading, keep internal and external valves on the receiving tank open
along with the pressure relief valves.
When making a connection, shut off the vehicle engine. When transferring
Class 3 materials, shut off the vehicle engine unless it is used to operate a
pump.
Maintain communication with the pumping and receiving stations.
Monitor the liquid level in the receiving tank to prevent overflow.
Monitor flow meters to determine rate of flow
When topping off the tank, reduce flow rate  to prevent overflow.

Make sure the transfer operation is completed.
Close all tank and loading valves before disconnecting.
Securely close all vehicle internal, external,  and dome cover valves before
disconnecting.
Secure all hatches.
Disconnect grounding/bonding wires.
Make sure the hoses are drained to remove the remaining oil before moving
them away from the connection.  Use a drip  pan.
Cap the end of the hose and other connecting devices  before moving them to
prevent uncontrolled leakage.
Remove wheel chocks and interlocks.
Inspect the lowermost drain and  ail outlets on tank truck prior to departure. If
necessary, tighten, adjust, or replace caps,  valves, or other equipment to
prevent oil leaking while in transit.	
                                             -21-
                                                                               VersionLO, 11/28/2005

-------
 Unified Oil Company, Ltd,
SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
3.11   Brittle Fracture Evaluation (40 CFR 112.7{i))

The only field-constructed tank at the facility is Tank #7. All other tanks were shop-built.

The shell thickness of Tank #7 is less than one-half inch. As discussed in the American
Petroleum Institute (API) Standard 653 Tank Inspection, Repair, Alteration, and Reconstruction
(API-653), brittle fracture is not a concern for tanks that have a shell thickness of less than one-
half inch. This is the extent of the brittle fracture evaluation for this tank.

Nonetheless, in the event that Tank #7 undergoes a repair, alteration, reconstruction, or change
in service that might affect the risk of a discharge or failure, the container will be evaluated for
risk of discharge or failure, following API-653 or an equivalent approach, and corrective action
will be taken as necessary.

3.12  Conformance with State and Local Applicable Requirements (40 CFR
       112.70))

All bulk storage tanks at this facility are registered with the state and local authorities (Stonefield
Fire Department) and have current certificates of registration and special use permits required
by the local fire code.

Both USTs at the facility (Tanks #5 and 6) meet all requirements of Massachusetts UST
regulation, including cathodic protection, double-wall construction, and monitoring systems,
although Tank #6 is not subject to these requirements.

Treated storm water runoff is discharged to Silver Creek as permitted under NPDES permit
#MA0001990. The maximum allowable daily oil/grease concentration is 15 mg/L. Grab samples
are taken each quarter, following the monitoring requirements specified in the NPDES permit.
                                         -22-
                                                                        VersionlO, 11/28/2005

-------
 Unified Oil Company, Ltd.
SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
     PART 4:  Discharge Prevention - SPCC  Provisions for

      Onshore Facilities (Excluding Production Facilities)

4.1   Facility Drainage (40 CFR112.8(b))

Drainage from the concrete dike surrounding tanks 1, 2, and 3 is restrained by a manually-
operated gate valve to prevent a discharge from entering the facility drainage system. The gate
valve is normally sealed closed, except when draining the secondary containment structure. The
content of the secondary containment dike is inspected by facility personnel prior to draining to
ensure that only oil-free water is allowed to enter the facility storm water drainage system. The
bypass valve is opened and resealed under direct personnel supervision. Drainage events are
recorded in the log included in Appendix D to this SPCC Plan.

Any potential discharge from ASTs will be restrained by secondary containment structures.
Discharges occurring during loading/unloading operations will be restrained by the rollover
berm. The  facility includes a drainage system and an oil/water separator, which are used to as
containment for spilt sources outside the main berm areas (fuel dispensing, overfills of 500-
gallon AST (Tank#4), and transfers associated with the heating oil tank). The facility is equipped
with an oil/water separator engineered to retain oil at the facility. This separator provides
environmental protection equivalent to ponds, tagoons, or catchments basins required under 40
CFR 112.8(b)(3) and (4), as allowed in 40 CFR 112.7(a)(2). Discharges outside the containment
areas, such as those occurring in the fuel dispensing area or while unloading heating oil, will
flow by gravity into the drainage collection area and into the oil/water separator where oil will be
retained until it can be pumped out.

4.2   Bulk Storage Containers (40 CFR 112.8(c))

Table 4-1 summarizes the construction, volume, and content of bulk storage containers at
Unified Oil facility.
                                        •23-
                                                                     Versionl.O, 11/28/2005

-------
Unified Oil Company. Ltd.
SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
                            Table 4-1: List of Oil Containers
tank
#1


#2


#3


#4




#5





#6





#7












Location
Bulk Storage
Area

Bulk Storage
Area

Bulk Storage
Area

Varies




Fuel
Dispensing
Area



Outside
Office
Building



Bulk Storage
Area


Inside
Maintenance
Building






Type (Construction
Standard)
AST vertical (UL142)


AST horizontal (UL142)


AST horizontal (UL142)


AST dual wall, portable
tank(UL142)



UST dual wall (STI P3)





UST dual wall (STIP3)





AST vertical (field-
erected). Heated during
winter months (internal
coils)
Steel drums








Capacity Content
{gallons)
20,000 Diesel


20,000 Premium
unleaded
gasoline
20,000 Regular
unleaded
gasoline
500 Regular
unleaded
gasoline


5,000 Diesel





1,000 No. 2 Fuel Oil





10,000 No. 6 Fuel Oil



55 Motor oil and
used oil







Discharge :
Prevention 4
Containment
Concrete dike.
Liquid level
gauge.
Concrete dike.
Liquid level
gauge.
Concrete dike.
Liquid level
gauge.
Double-wall.
Liquid level gauge
and interstitial
monitoring
system.
Double-wall.
Liquid level
gauge, overfill
protection system,
and interstitial
monitoring.
Double-wall.
Liquid level
gauge, overfill
protection system,
and interstitial
monitoring.
Concrete dike.
Liquid level
gauge.

Spill pallets with
built-in
containment
capacity. Building
also serves as
containment since
floor drains flow
into oil/water
separator
                                           -24-
                                                                            Version 10,11/28/2005

-------
 Unified Oil Company, Ltd.
SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
4.2.1   Construction (40 CFR 112.8(c)(1))

All oil tanks used at this facility are constructed of steel, in accordance with industry
specifications as described above. The design and construction of all bulk storage containers
are compatible with the characteristics of the oil product they contain, and with temperature and
pressure conditions.

Piping between fixed aboveground bulk storage tanks is made of steel and placed aboveground
on appropriate supports designed to minimize erosion and stress.

4.2.2   Secondary Containment (40 CFR 112.8(c)(2))

A dike is provided around Tanks #1, 2, 3, and 7. Tanks #1, 2, and 3 each have a 20,000-gallon
capacity. Tank #7 has a 10,000-gallon capacity. The dike  has a total containment capacity of
27,316 gallons to allow sufficient volume for the largest tank and freeboard for precipitation.
The freeboard is sufficient to contain a 4-inch rainfall corresponding to a 25-year, 24-hour storm
event for this region of Massachusetts, as documented in  Appendix F of this Plan. The floor and
walls of the containment dike are constructed of poured concrete reinforced with steel. The
concrete dike was built under the supervision of a structural engineer and in conformance with
his  specifications to be impervious to oil for a period of 72 hours. The facility is unattended for a
maximum of 40 hours (Saturday evening through Monday morning) and therefore any spill into
the diked area would be detected before it could escape the diked area. The surface of the
concrete floor, the inside and outside of the walls, and the interface of the floor and walls, are
visually inspected during the monthly facility inspection to  detect any crack, signs of heaving or
settlement, or other structural damage that could affect the ability of the dike to contain oil. Any
damage is promptly corrected to prevent migration  of oil into the ground, or out of the dike.

The 500-gallon  portable AST tank is of double-wall construction and provides intrinsic
secondary containment for 110 percent of the tank capacity. Since the secondary containment
is not open to precipitation, this volume is sufficient to fully contain the product in the event of a
teak from the primary container. The interstitial space between the primary and secondary
containers is inspected on a monthly basis to detect any teak of product from the primary
container. The container,  however, is not equipped to prevent overfills as required by EPA
policy in its memorandum on double-walled tanks. Therefore, general containment is required
for potential tank overfills. This containment is accomplished through the facility drainage
system  and the oil/water separator, which  provide environmentally equivalent protection as
described in Section 3.1 of this Plan.

Both USTs are of double-wall construction and provide intrinsic secondary containment for
110 percent of the tank capacity. The interstitial space between the primary and secondary
containers is inspected on a monthly basis to detect any leak of product from the primary
container.

The 55-gallon drums are placed on spill pallets inside the  maintenance shop.  Each spill pallet
provides 75 gallons of containment capacity, which is more than the required 55 gallons for any
single drum since the drums are not exposed to precipitation. The floor of the maintenance shop
                                          •25-
                                                                         VeraonlO, 11/28/2005

-------
 Unified Oil Company, Ltd.
SAMPLE  Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
is impervious and sloped to direct any discharge occurring in the building away from doorways
and towards the drainage system that leads to the facility oil/water separator.

4,2.3   Drainage of Diked Areas (40 CFR112.8(c)(3))

The concrete dikes are drained under direct supervision of facility personnel. The accumulated
water is observed for signs of oil prior to draining. The gate valves are normally kept in a closed
position and locked except when draining the dike. Dike drainage events are recorded on the
form Included in Appendix D of this Plan; records are maintained at the facility for at least three
years.

4.2.4   Corrosion Protection {40 CFR 112.8(c)(4))

Both metallic underground storage tanks, including Tank #6, which is subject to the
requirements of 40 CFR part 112,  are coated  and cathodically protected to prevent corrosion
and leakage into the ground. Pressure testing is performed on both buried storage tanks every
two years following the requirements of 40 CFR part 280. The cathodic protection system is
tested annually to verify its efficacy.

Cathodic protection  is provided for both tanks in accordance with 40 CFR part 280 and meets
the requirements of 40 CFR part 112.

Records of pressure tests are kept for at least three years.

4.2.5   Partially Buried and Bunkered Storage Tanks (40 CFR 112.8(c)(5))

This section is not applicable since there are no partially buried or bunkered storage tanks at
this facility.

4.2.6   Inspections and Tests (40 CFR 112.8(c)(6)}

Visual inspections of ASTs by facility personnel are performed according to the procedure
described in this SPCC Plan. Leaks from tank seams, gaskets, rivets, and bolts are promptly
corrected. Records of inspections and tests are signed by the inspector and kept at the facility
for at least three years.

The scope and schedule of certified inspections and tests performed on the facility's ASTs are
specified in STI Standard SP-001. The external inspection includes ultrasonic testing of the
shell, as specified in the standard, or if recommended by the certified tank inspector to assess
the integrity of the tank for continued oil  storage.

Records of certified tank inspections are kept at the facility for at least three years. Shell test
comparison records are retained for the life of the tanks.
                                          -26-
                                                                         Vetsion 1 0, 11/28/2005

-------
  Unified Oil Company, Ltd.
SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
Table 4-2 summarizes inspections and tests performed on bulk storage containers ("EE"
indicates that an environmentally equivalent measure is implemented in place of the
inspection/test, as discussed in Section 3.1 of this Plan).

    Table 4-2: Scope and Frequency of Bulk Storage Containers Inspections and Tests
Inspection/Test
Visual inspection by facility
personnel (as per checklist of
Appendix C)
External inspection by certified
inspector (as per STI Standard
SP-001)
Internal Inspection by certified
inspector (as per STI Standard
SP-001)
Tank tightness test meeting
requirements of 40 CFR 280
#1
M
A

20 yr


t




#2
M
A

20 yr


t




Tank »D
#3 #4 #S
M M
A A

10 yr EE


20 yr* EE


2yr

#6 #7 Drums
M M
A A

10 yr EE


20 yr* EE


2yr

Legend:       M: Monthly
              A: Annual
              EE: Inspection not required given use of environmentally equivalent measure (refer to
              Section 3.1 of this Plan).
              * Or earlier, as recommended by the certified inspector based on findings from an external
              inspection.
              f Internal inspection may be recommended by the certified inspector based on findings
              from the external inspection.

The frequency above is based on implementation of a scheduled  inspection/testing program. To
initiate the program, ASTs will be inspected by the following dates:

       »•      Tank #1: external inspection to be performed by December 31,2009
       »•      Tank #2: external inspection to be performed by December 31, 2009
       «•      Tank #3: external inspection to be performed by December 31, 2006
       c      Tank #7: external Inspection to be performed by December 31,2006

4.2.7  Heating Coils (40 CFR 112.8(c)(7))

Exhaust lines from internal heating coils for Tank #7 drain to the oil/water separator. The
exhaust lines are monitored for signs of leakage as part of the monthly inspection of the facility.

4.2.8  Overfill Prevention Systems (40 CFR 112.8(c)(8))

All tanks are equipped with a direct-reading level gauge. Additionally, all four fixed ASTs (Tanks
#1, 2, 3, and 7) are equipped with high level alarms set at 90 percent of the rated capacity. Tank
                                          -27-
                                                                         Version 1.0. 11/28/2005

-------
 Unified Oil Company, Ltd.
SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
#4 does not have an overfill prevention system. General secondary containment is provided in
the event of overfills, as described in this Plan.

Storage drums are not refilled, and therefore overfill prevention systems do not apply.

Tanks #5 and 6 are equipped with liquid level gauges and overfill protection systems. Liquid
level sensing devices are tested on a monthly basis during the monthly inspection of the facility,
following manufacturer  recommendations. Venting capacity is suitable for the fill and withdrawal
rates.

Facility personnel are present throughout the filling operations to monitor the product level in the
tanks.

4.2.9  Effluent Treatment Facilities (40 CFR 112.8(c)(9))

The facility's storm water effluent discharged into Silver Creek is observed and records
maintained according to the frequency required by NPDES permit MA0000157 (at least once
per month) to detect possible upsets in the oil/water separator that could lead to a discharge.

4.2.10 Visible Discharges (40 CFR 112.8(c)(10))

Visible discharges from any container or appurtenance - including seams, gaskets, piping,
pumps, valves, rivets, and bolts - are quickly corrected upon discovery.

Oil is promptly removed from the diked area and disposed of according to the waste disposal
method described in Part 5 of this Plan.

4.2.11 Mobile and Portable Containers (40 CFR 112.8(c}(11))

Tank #4 is of double-wall design, which provides for adequate secondary containment in the
event of leaks in the primary container shell. The interstitial space is monitored monthly for
signs of leakage.

Small portable oil storage containers, such as 55-gallon drums, are stored inside the
maintenance shop where secondary containment is provided by spill pallets and the floor is
sloped to drain away from the floor drains and  door. Any discharged material is quickly
contained and cleaned  up using sorbent pads and appropriate cleaning products.

Unified Oil delivery trucks generally return to the facility empty or product is returned to
inventory. Whenever they remain at the facility while full for an extended period of time (such as
when parking overnight with an emergency load of product), they are positioned in the loading
rack/unloading area, which provides 2,500 gallons of secondary containment capacity (i.e.,
sufficient for the  capacity of the delivery truck (2,000 gallons) and additional freeboard for 4
inches of precipitation).
                                          -28-
                                                                         VersionlO, 11/28/2005

-------
 Unified Oil Company, Ltd.
SAMPLE  Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
4.3    Transfer Operations, Pumping, and In-Plant Processes
       (40CFR112.8(d))

Transfer operations at this facility include:

       >•     The transfer of oil from the underground fuel oil storage tank to the furnace
             located in the basement of the office building. The oil is pumped from the oil
             storage tank by means of buried steel fuel lines and a suction pump system.
       *     The filling of facility delivery trucks using the gasoline dispenser.
       »•     The transfer of oil into or from tanker trucks at the loading rack/unloading area.

All buried piping at this facility is cathodically protected against corrosion and is provided with a
protective wrapping and coating. When a section of buried line is exposed, it is carefully
examined for deterioration. If corrosion damage is found, additional examination and corrective
action must be taken as deemed appropriate considering the magnitude of the damage.
Additionally, Unified Oil conducts integrity and leak testing of buried piping at the time of
installation, modification, construction, relocation, or replacement. Records of all tests are kept
at the facility for at least three years.

Lines that are not in service or are on standby for an extended period of time are capped or
blank-flanged and marked as to their origin.

All pipe supports are designed to minimize abrasion and corrosion and to allow for expansion
and contraction. Pipe supports are visually inspected during the monthly inspection of the
facility.

All aboveground piping and valves are examined monthly to assess their condition. Inspection
includes aboveground valves, piping,  appurtenances, expansion joints, valve glands and
bodies, catch pans, pipeline supports, locking of valves, and metal surfaces. Observations are
noted on the monthly inspection checklist provided in this Plan.

Warning signs are posted at appropriate locations throughout the facility to prevent vehicles
from damaging aboveground piping and appurtenances. Most of the aboveground piping is
located within areas that are not accessible to vehicular traffic (e.g., inside diked area). Brightly
painted bollards are placed  where needed to prevent vehicular collisions with equipment.
                                          -29-
                                                                         Version 1.0. 11/28/2005

-------
 Unified Oil Company, Ltd.
SAMPLE  Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
                       Part 5: Discharge Response
This section describes the response and cleanup procedures in the event of an oil discharge.
The uncontrolled discharge of oil to groundwater, surface water, or soil is prohibited by state
and possibly federal laws. Immediate action must be taken to control, contain, and recover
discharged product.

In general, the following steps are taken:

       «•      Eliminate potential spark sources;
       >      If possible and safe to do so, identify and shut down source of the discharge to
             stop the flow;
             Contain the discharge with sorbents, berms, fences, trenches, sandbags, or
             other material;
       >      Contact the Facility Manager or his/her alternate;
             Contact regulatory authorities and the response organization; and
       »      Collect and dispose of recovered products according to regulation.

For the purpose of establishing appropriate response procedures, this SPCC Plan classifies
discharges as either "minor" or "major," depending  on the volume and characteristics of the
material released.

A list of Emergency Contacts is provided in Appendix H. The list is also posted at prominent
locations throughout the facility. A list of discharge  response material kept at the facility is
Included  in Appendix J.

5.1    Response to a Minor Discharge

A "minor" discharge is defined as one that poses no significant harm (or threat) to human health
and safety or to the environment. Minor discharges are generally those where;

       »      The quantity of product discharged is small (e.g.,  may involve less than  10
             gallons of oil);
             Discharged material is easily stopped and controlled at the time of the discharge;
             Discharge is localized near the source;
             Discharged material is not  likely to reach water;
             There is little risk to human health or safety; and
             There is little risk of fire or explosion.
                                         -30-
                                                                        VersionlO, 11/28/2005

-------
 Unified Oil Company, Ltd.
SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
Minor discharges can usually be cleaned up by Unified Oil personnel. The following guidelines
apply:

       ••      Immediately notify the Facility Manager.
       >      Under the direction of the Facility Manager, contain the discharge with discharge
             response materials and equipment. Place discharge debris in properly labeled
             waste containers.
       ••      The Facility Manager will complete the discharge notification form (Appendix I)
             and attach  a copy to this SPCC Plan.
       »•      If the discharge involves more than 10 gallons of oil, the Facility Manager will call
             the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Incident Response
             Division (617-556-1133).

5.2    Response to a Major Discharge

A "major" discharge is defined as one that cannot be safely controlled or cleaned up by facility
personnel, such as when:

             The discharge is large enough to spread beyond the immediate discharge area;
             The discharged material enters water;
             The discharge requires special equipment or training to clean up;
             The discharged material poses a hazard to human health or safety; or
             There is a danger of fire or explosion.

In the event of a major discharge, the following guidelines apply:

       ••      All workers must immediately evacuate the discharge site via the designated exit
             routes and move to the designated staging areas at a safe distance from the
             discharge.  Exit routes are included on the facility diagram and posted in the
             maintenance building, in the office building, and on the outside wall of the outside
             shed that contains the spill response equipment.
       >      If the Facility Manager is not present at the facility, the senior on-site person
             notifies the Facility Manager of the discharge and has authority to initiate
             notification and response. Certain notifications are dependent on the
             circumstances and type of discharge. For example, if oil reaches a sanitary
             sewer, the  publicly owned treatment works (POTW) should be notified
             immediately. A discharge that threatens Silver Creek may require immediate
             notification to downstream users such as the town drinking water plant, which
             has an intake located on Silver Creek.
       »      The Facility Manager (or senior on-site person) must call for medical assistance if
             workers are injured.
       *      The Facility Manager (or senior on-site person) must notify the Fire Department
             or Police Department.
       »•      The Facility Manager (or senior on-site person) must call the spill response and
             cleanup contractors listed in the Emergency Contacts list in Appendix H.
                                         -31-
                                                                         Version 1.0.11/28/2005

-------
 Unified Oil Company, Ltd.	SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan

       >      The Facility Manager (or senior on-site person) must immediately contact the
             Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Incident Response
             Division (617-556-1133) and the National Response Center (888-424-8802).
       ••      The Facility Manager (or senior on-site person) must record the call on the
             Discharge Notification form in Appendix I and attach a copy to this SPCC Plan.
       »      The Facility Manager (or senior on-site person) coordinates cleanup and obtains
             assistance from a cleanup contractor or other response organization as
             necessary.

If the Facility Manager is not available at the time of the discharge, then the next highest person
in seniority assumes responsibility for coordinating response activities.


5.3    Waste Disposal

Wastes resulting from a minor discharge response will be containerized in impervious bags,
drums, or buckets. The facility manager will characterize the waste for proper disposal and
ensure that it is removed from the facility by a licensed waste hauler within two weeks.

Wastes resulting from a major discharge response will be removed and disposed of by a
cleanup contractor.


5.4    Discharge Notification

Any size discharge (i.e., one that creates a sheen, emulsion, or sludge) that affects or threatens
to affect navigable waters or adjoining  shorelines must be reported immediately to  the National
Response Center  (1-800-424-8802). The Center is staffed 24 hours a day.

A summary sheet  is included in Appendix  I to facilitate reporting. The person reporting the
discharge must provide the following information:

       Q     Name, location, organization, and telephone number
       Q     Name and address of the party responsible for the incident
       Q     Date and time of the incident
       Q     Location of the incident
       Q     Source and cause of the release or discharge
       Q     Types of material(s) released or discharged
       Q     Quantity of materials released  or discharged
       Q     Danger or threat posed  by the  release or discharge
       Q     Number and types of injuries (if any)
       Q     Media affected or threatened by the discharge (i.e., water,  land, air)
       Q     Weather conditions at the incident location
       Q     Any other information that may help emergency personnel  respond to the
             incident
                                         -32-                            Version 1.0.11/28/2005

-------
  Unified Oil Company, Ltd.
SAMPLE Spilt Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
Contact information for reporting a discharge to the appropriate authorities is listed in Appendix
H and is also posted in prominent locations throughout the facility (e.g., in the office building, in
the maintenance building, and at the loading rack/unloading area).

In addition to the above reporting, 40 CFR 112.4 requires that information be submitted to the
United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Regional Administrator and the
appropriate state agency in charge of oil pollution control activities (see contact information in
Appendix H) whenever the facility discharges (as defined in 40 CFR 112.1(b)) more than 1,000
gallons of oil in a single event, or discharges (as defined in 40 CFR 112.1(b)) more than 42
gallons of oil in each of two discharge incidents within a  12-month period. The following
information must be submitted to the EPA Regional Administrator and to MADEP within 60
days:

       »     Name of the facility;
       >     Name of the owner/operator;
       *     Location of the facility;
       >•     Maximum storage or handling capacity and normal daily throughput;
       -     Corrective action and countermeasures taken, including a description of
             equipment repairs and replacements;
       •>     Description of facility, including maps, flow diagrams, and topographical maps;
       -     Cause of the discharge(s) to navigable waters and adjoining shorelines, including
             a failure analysis of the system and subsystem in which the failure occurred;
       -     Additional preventive measures taken or contemplated to minimize possibility of
             recurrence; and
       »     Other pertinent information requested by the Regional Administrator.

A standard report for submitting the information to the EPA Regional Administrator and to
MADEP is included in Appendix K of this Plan.
5.5    Cleanup Contractors and Equipment Suppliers

Contact information for specialized spill response and cleanup contractors are provided in
Appendix M. These contractors have the necessary equipment to respond to a discharge of oil
that affects Silver Creek or adjoining shorelines, including floating booms and oil skimmers.

Spill kits are located at the loading rack/unloading area and inside the maintenance building.
The inventory of response supplies and equipment is provided in Appendix J of this Plan. The
inventory is verified on a monthly basis. Additional supplies and equipment may be ordered from
the following sources:
       AA Equipment Co.
       Eastern Sorbent
                  (800) 555-5556
                  (800) 555-5557
                                         -33-
                                                                        VersionlO, 11/28/2005

-------
Unified Oil Company, Ltd.	SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan



                       Appendix A
              Site Plan and Facility Diagram
Figure A-1: Site Plan
                       1 STONEFIELD
                                            Unified Oil
                                            Company
                            -34-
                                                  Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
i
OJ
b
'o
to
ov
O)
                                                                                               I
                                                                                              in
                                                                                              CO
                                                                                ^ i j
                                                                                ' \v  »l

-------
 Unified Oil Company, Ltd.
                           SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
                                  Appendix B
                    Substantial Harm Determination
Facility Name:
Facility Address:
                          Unified Oil Company
                          123 A Street
                          Stonefield, MA 02000
1. Does the facility transfer oil over water to or from vessels and does the facility have a total oil
storage capacity greater than or equal to 42,000 gallons?
       Yes D              No •
2. Does the facility have a total oil storage capacity greater than or equal to 1 million gallons and
does the facility lack secondary containment that is sufficiently large to contain the capacity of
the largest aboveground oil storage tank plus sufficient freeboard to allow for precipitation within
any aboveground storage tank area?
       Yes D              No •
3. Does the facility have a total oil storage capacity greater than or equal to 1 million gallons and
is the facility located at a distance (as calculated using the appropriate formula in 40 CFR part
112 Appendix C, Attachment C-lll or a comparable formula) such that a discharge from the
facility could cause injury to fish and wildlife and sensitive environments?
       Yes D              No •
4. Does the facility have a total oil storage capacity greater than or equal to 1 million gallons and
is the facility located at a distance (as calculated using the appropriate formula in 40 CFR part
112 Appendix C, Attachment C-lll or a comparable formula) such that a discharge from the
facility would shut down a public drinking water  intake?
       Yes D              No •
5. Does the facility have a total oil storage capacity greater than or equal to 1 million gallons and
has the facility experienced a reportable oil spill in an amount greater than or equal to 10,000
gallons within the last 5 years?
       Yes D              No •

Certification
I certify under penalty of law that I have personally examined and am familiar with the
information submitted in this document, and that based on my inquiry of those individuals
responsible for obtaining this information, I believe that the submitted information is true,
accurate, and complete.
                                       Facility Manager
                                       Title

                                       May 12, 2003
                                       Date
Signature

Susan Blake
Name (type or print)
                                         -36-
                                                                        Versionl.0.11/26/2005

-------
 Unified Oil Company, Ltd.
SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
                               APPENDIX C

                    Facility Inspection Checklists

The following checklists are to be used for monthly and annual facility-conducted inspections.
Completed checklists must be signed by the inspector and maintained at the facility, with this
SPCC Plan, for at least three years.
                                      -37-
                                                                   Versionl.O, 11/28/2005

-------
 Unified Oil Company, Ltd.
SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
                     Monthly Inspection Checklist
This inspection record must be completed each month except the month in which an annual
inspection is performed. Provide further description and comments, if necessary, on a separate
sheet of paper and attach to this sheet.  *Any item that receives "yes" as an answer must be
described and addressed immediately.
Storage tanks
Tank surfaces show signs of leakage
Tanks are damaged, rusted or deteriorated
Bolts, rivets, or seams are damaged
Tank supports are deteriorated or buckled
Tank foundations have eroded or settled
Level gauges or alarms are inoperative
Vents are obstructed
Secondary containment is damaged or stained
Water/product in interstice of double-walled tank
Dike drainage valve is open or is not locked
Piping
Valve seals, gaskets, or other appurtenances are leaking
Pipelines or supports are damaged or deteriorated
Joints, valves and other appurtenances are leaking
Buried piping is exposed
Loading/unloading and transfer equipment
Loading/unloading rack is damaged or deteriorated
Connections are not capped or blank-flanged
Secondary containment is damaged or stained
Berm drainage valve is open or is not locked
Oil/water separator
Oil/water separator > 2 inches of accumulated oil
Oil/water separator effluent has a sheen
Security
Fencing, gates, or lighting is non-functional
Pumps and valves are locked if not in use
Response Equipment
Response equipment inventory is complete
V*:














N Description & Qpmitients ::;














Date:
           Signature:
                                       -38-
                                                                    Version 1 0, 11/28/2005

-------
 Unified Oil Company. Ltd.
SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
                Annual Facility Inspection Checklist

This inspection record must be completed each year. If any response requires further
elaboration, provide comments in Description & Comments space provided. Further description
and comments, if necessary, must be provided on a separate sheet of paper and attached to
this sheet. *Any item that receives "yes" as an answer must be described and addressed
immediately.
Storage tanks
Tank #1
Tank surfaces show signs of leakage
Tank is damaged, rusted or deteriorated
Bolts, rivets or seams are damaged
Tank supports are deteriorated or buckled
Tank foundations have eroded or settled
Level gauges or alarms are inoperative
Vents are obstructed
Tank #2
Tank surfaces show signs of leakage
Tank is damaged, rusted, or deteriorated
Bolts, rivets, or seams are damaged
Tank supports are deteriorated or buckled
Tank foundations have eroded or settled
Level gauges or alarms are inoperative
Vents are obstructed
Tank #3
Tank surfaces show signs of leakage
Tank is damaged, rusted, or deteriorated
Bolts, rivets, or seams are damaged
Tank supports are deteriorated or buckled
Tank foundations have eroded or settled
Level gauges or alarms are inoperative
Vents are obstructed
Tank #4
Tank surfaces show signs of leakage
Tank is damaged, rusted or deteriorated
Bolts, rivets or seams are damaged
Tank supports are deteriorated or buckled
Tank foundations have eroded or settled
Level gauges or alarms are inoperative
x;:W:..:.:,:::De^ript(i3n::^;;^orrimierj^: :;;;>;:.; •.••f^l: :
















                                      -39-
                                                                   VersionlO, 11/28/2005

-------
Unified Oil Company, Ltd.
SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and Counts/measure (SPCC) Plan
•'••••••' 	 :.•••: - -• -. ; 	 Y*
Vents are obstructed
Oil is present in the interstice
Tank #7
Tank surfaces show signs of leakage
Tank is damaged, rusted, or deteriorated
Bolts, rivets, or seams are damaged
Tank supports are deteriorated or buckled
Tank foundations have eroded or settled
Level gauges or alarms are inoperative
Leakage in exhaust from heating coils
Concrete dike
Secondary containment is stained
Dike drainage valve is open or is not locked
Dike walls or floors are cracked or are separating
Dike is not retaining water (following large rainfall)
Piping
Valve seals or gaskets are leaking
Pipelines or supports are damaged or deteriorated
Joints, valves and other appurtenances are leaking
Buried piping is exposed
Out-of-service pipes are not capped
Warning signs are missing or damaged
Loading/unloading and transfer equipment
Loading/unloading rack is damaged or deteriorated
Connections are not capped or blank-flanged
Rollover berm is damaged or stained
Berm drainage valve is open or is not locked
Drip pans have accumulated oil or are leaking
Oil/water separator
Oil/water separator > 2 inches of accumulated oil
Oil/water separator effluent has a sheen
Security
Fencing, gates, or lighting is non-functional
Pumps and valves are not locked (and not in use)
Response equipment
Response eciuipment inventory is incomplete
N Description & Comments















                                           -40-
                                                                             VersionLO. 11^28/2005

-------
 Unified Oil Company, Ltd.      SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
Annual reminders:
>•      Hold SPCC Briefing for all oil-handling personnel (and update briefing log in the Plan);
••      Check contact information for key employees and response/cleanup contractors and
       update them in the Plan as needed;
Additional Remarks:
Date:	                  Signature:
                                         -41-                            Version 1.0. 11/28/2005

-------
 Unified Oil Company, Ltd.
SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
                              APPENDIX D

              Record of Containment Dike Drainage

This record must be completed when rainwater from diked areas is drained into a storm drain or
into an open watercourse, lake, or pond, and bypasses the water treatment system. The bypass
valve must normally be sealed in closed position. It must be opened and resealed following
drainage under responsible supervision.
Date
06/05/2003
07/15/2003



Diked Area Presence of Time ; Time Signature
Area 1 No oil 08:00 10:00 Susan Blake
Area 1 No oil 08:20 10:30 Susan Blake



                                     -42-
                                                                 Versionl 0.11/28/2005

-------
 Unified Oil Company, Ltd.
SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
                                APPENDIX E

             Record of Annual Discharge Prevention

                         Briefings and Training


Briefings will be scheduled and conducted by the facility owner or operator for operating
personnel at regular intervals to ensure adequate understanding  of this SPCC Plan. The
briefings will also highlight and describe known discharge events or failures, malfunctioning
components, and recently implemented precautionary measures  and best practices. Personnel
will also be instructed in operation and maintenance of equipment to prevent the discharge of
oil, and in applicable pollution laws, rules, and regulations. Facility operators and other
personnel will have an opportunity during the briefings to share recommendations concerning
health, safety, and environmental issues  encountered during facility operations.
Date





Subjects Covered Employees in Attendance





Instructor(s)





                                       -43-
                                                                    VersiorMQ. 11/28/2005

-------
 Unified Oil Company, Ltd.
SAMPLE Spill Prevention. Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
                                 APPENDIX F

        Calculation of Secondary Containment Capacity


The maximum 24-hour rainfall recorded in the last 25 years at this location is 3.75 inches.

Bulk Storage Dike

       Capacity of Tanks within the Diked Area:
       Tank 1 = 20,000 gallons (saddle-mounted tank, no significant displacement)
       Tank 2 = 20,000 gallons (saddle-mounted tank, no significant displacement)
       Tank 3 = 20,000 gallons (need to account for tank displacement)
       Tank 7 = 10,000 gallons (on legs, no significant displacement)

       Dike Dimensions:
       Dike footprint = 50 feet x 60 feet
       Dike height =15 inches = 1.25 feet
       Dike volume =  50' x 60' x 1.25' = 3750 ft3 x 7.48 gal/ft3 = 28,050 gallons

       Displacement Volume of Tank 3:
       Tank diameter = 10 feet
       3.1415 * (10 ft)2 / 4 * 1.25' = 98 ft3 x 7.48 gal/ft3 = 734  gallons

       Available Freeboard for Precipitation:
       28,050 gallons - (20,000 gallons + 734 gallons) = 7,316 gallons
       7,316 gallons / 7.48 gallons/ft3 / (50 ft x 60 ft) = 0.33 ft = 4 inches

       The dike therefore provides sufficient storage capacity for the largest bulk storage
       container within the diked area, tank displacement, and precipitation. The
       containment capacity is equivalent to 137% of the capacity of the largest container
       ((28,050 gallons - 734 gallons)/20,000 gallons).

Loading Rack/Unloading Area Rollover Berm

       Capacity of Largest Tank Truck Compartment:
       2,000 gallons

       Berm Dimensions.
       Berm footprint = 28 feet x 45 feet (50% of the berm surface area is covered by the roof)
       Berm height = 4.5 inches = 0.375 feet
       Berm volume = 28 ft x 45 ft x 0.375 ft = 473 ft3 x 7.48  gal/ft3 = 3,534 gallons

       Available Freeboard for Precipitation:
       Since 50% of the surface area of the berm is covered by a roof, the volume of
       precipitation that enters the berm is reduced.
                                        -44-
                                                                     Version 1.0. 11/28/2005

-------
Unified Oil Company, Ltd.      SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan

      Minimum freeboard required = 28 ft x 45 ft x 0.5 x 3.75/12 = 197 ft3 = 1,472 gallons
      Actual freeboard = 3,534 gallons - 2,000 gallons = 1,534 gallons

      The berm therefore provides sufficient storage capacity to contain both the largest
      compartment of tank trucks loading/unloading at the facility, and the volume of
      precipitation that enters the berm.
                                        -45-                            Version 10, 11/28/2005

-------
Unified Oil Company, Ltd.
SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
                                            -46-
                                                                              Version 1.0.11/28/2005

-------
 Unified Oil Company, Ltd.
SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
                             APPENDIX G
         Records of Tank Integrity and Pressure Tests
Attach copies of official records of tank integrity and pressure tests.
                                   -47-
                                                             Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
 Unified Oil Company, Ltd.
SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
                               APPENDIX H
                          Emergency Contacts
Designated person responsible for spill prevention:   Susan Blake, Facility Manager
                                                781-555-5550
EMERGENCY TELEPHONE NUMBERS:
 Facility
 Susan Blake, Facility Manager
 Local Emergency Response
 Stonefield Fire Department

 St. Mary's Hospital
 Response/Cleanup Contractors
 EZ Clean
 Stonefield Oil Removal
 Notification
 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, incident
 Response Division
 National Response Center
 United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 1
                                     781-555-5550
                                     911 or
                                     781-555-5551
                                     781-555-5552
                                     617-555-5554
                                     781-555-5555

                                     617-556-1133

                                     800-424-8802
                                     888-372-7341
                                      -48-
                                                                  Version 1.0 11/28/2005

-------
 Unified Oil Company, Ltd.
       SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
                                    APPENDIX  I
                        Discharge Notification Form
 Part A: Discharge Information
 General information when reporting a spill to outside authorities:
 Name:
 Address:

 Telephone:
 Owner/Operator:
 Primary Contact:
 Type of oil:
Unified Oil Company
123 A Street
Stonefield, MA 02000
(781)555-5556
Blake and Daughters, Inc.
20 Fairview  Road
Stonefield, MA 02000
Susan Blake, Facility Manager
Work:         (781)555-5550
Cell(24hrs):   (781)555-5559
 Quantity released:
 Quantity released to a waterbody:
                        Discharge Date and Time:

                        Discovery Date and Time:
                        Discharge Duration:
 Location/Source:
 Actions taken to stop, remove, and mitigate impacts of the discharge:
 Affected media:
 Oair
 n water
 Dsoil
 Notification person:
                        D storm water sewer/POTW
                        D dike/berm/oil-water separator
                        D other:	
                        Telephone contact:
                        Business:
                        24-hr:
 Nature of discharges, environmental/health effects, and damages:
: Injuries, fatalities or evacuation required?
 Part B: Notification Checklist
                                            Date and time      Name of person receiving call
 Discharge in any amount
 Susan Blake, Facility Manager and Response
 Coordinator
 (781) 555-5550 / (781) 555-5559
 Discharge in amount exceeding 10 gallons and not affecting a waterbody or groundwater
                                           -49-
                                                                           VersiontO. 11/28/2005

-------
 Unified Oil Company, Ltd.
SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
 Local Fire Department
 Fire Chief: D. Evans
 (781) 555-1258 or 911
 Massachusetts Department of Environmental
 Protection
 (888) 304-1133 or (617) 553-1133

 Discharge in any amount and affecting (or threatening to affect) a water body

 Local Fire Department
 Fire Chief: D. Evans
 (781) 555-1258 or 911
 Massachusetts Department of Environmental
 Protection
 (888) 304-1133 or (617) 553-1133
 National Response Center
 (800) 424-8802

 Town of Stonefield POTW
 Plant Operator: K. Bromberg
 (781)555-5453
 Town of Stonefield Drinking Water Plant
 Plant Operator: D. Lopez
 (781)555-5450
 EZ Clean
 (617) 555-5554
* The POTW should be notified of a discharge only if oil has reached or threatens sewer drains that
connect to the POTW collection system.
                                            -50-
                                                                             VersionlO, 11/28/2005

-------
 Unified Oil Company, Ltd.
SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
                               APPENDIX J
           Discharge Response Equipment inventory

The discharge response equipment inventory is verified during the monthly inspection and must
be replenished as needed.

Tank Truck Loading/Unloading Area

      O     Empty 55-gallons drums to hold contaminated material   4
      D     Loose absorbent material                           200 pounds
      D     Absorbent pads                                   3 boxes
      O     Nitrite gloves                                     6 pairs
      D     Neoprene gloves                                  6 pairs
      D     Vinyl/PVC pull-on overboots                         6 pairs
      D     Non-sparking shovels                              3
      D     Brooms                                         3
      D     Drain seals or mats                                2
      D     Sand bags                                       12

Maintenance Building

      O     Empty 55-gallons drums to hold contaminated material   1
      D     Loose absorbent material                           50 pounds
      D     Absorbent pads                                   1 box
      D     Nitrite gloves                                     2 pairs
      D     Neoprene gloves                                  2 pairs
      D     Vinyl/PVC pull-on overboots                         2 pairs
      D     Non-sparking shovels                              1
      D     Brooms                                         1
      D     Drain seals or mats                                1
                                     -51-
                                                                 Vefsion 1 0,11/28/2005

-------
 Unified Oil Company, Ltd.
SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
                                 APPENDIX K
                Agency  Notification Standard Report

Information contained in this report, and any supporting documentation, must be submitted to
the EPA Region 1 Regional Administrator, and to MADEP, within 60 days of the qualifying
discharge incident.
 Facility:
 Owner/operator:


 Name of person filing report:

 Location:

 Maximum storage capacity:

 Daily throughput:
 Nature of qualifying incident(s):
              Unified Oil Company
              Blake and Daughters
              20 Fairview Road
              Stonefield, MA 02000
            i
              123 A Street
              Stonefield, MA 02000
              74,600 gallons
              8,000 gallons
 D Discharge to navigable waters or adjoining shorelines exceeding 1,000 gallons
 D Second discharge exceeding 42 gallons within a 12-month period.
 Description of facility (attach maps, flow diagrams, and topographical maps):

 Unified Oil distributes a variety of petroleum products to primarily commercial customers. The
 facility handles, stores, uses, and distributes petroleum products in the form of gasoline,
 diesel, No. 2 fuel oil, No. 6 fuel oil, and motor oil. Unified Oil receives products by common
 carrier via tanker truck. The products are stored in five aboveground storage tanks (ASTs)
 and in one underground storage tank (UST). They are delivered to customers by Unified Oil
 trucks or by independent contractors. The facility refuels its own two delivery trucks from an
 underground diesel tank connected to a fueling pump.

 Unified Oil is located in a primarily commercial area at 123 A Street in Stonefield,
 Massachusetts.  The site is comprised of approximately 2 acres of land and is bordered to the
 East by A Street, to the West by Silver Creek, and to the North by ABC Plating Co.

 Site improvements include an office building, a maintenance shop, a tanker truck loading rack
 and unloading area, and product storage and handling areas. Petroleum products are stored
 in the bulk storage area, the maintenance building, and the office building.
                                        -52-
                                                                      VersionlO, 11/28/2005

-------
Unified Oil Company, Ltd.
SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
                   Agency Notification Standard Report (cont'd)
Cause of the discharge(s), including a failure analysis of the system and subsystems
in which the failure occurred:
Corrective actions and countermeasures taken, including a description of equipment
repairs and replacements:
Additional preventive measures taken or contemplated to minimize possibility of
recurrence:
Other pertinent information:
                                       -53-
                                                                    Versionl.O, 11/28/2005

-------
                         Disclaimer - Appendix E

      The sample Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan in Appendix E
is intended to provide examples and illustrations of how a production facility could address a
variety of scenarios in its SPCC Plan.  The "facility" is not an actual facility, nor does it represent
any actual facility or company.  Rather, EPA is providing illustrative examples of the type and
amount of information that is appropriate SPCC Plan language for these hypothetical situations.

      Because the SPCC rule is designed to give each facility owner/operator the flexibility to
tailor the facility's SPCC Plan to the facility's circumstances, this sample SPCC Plan is not a
template to be adopted by a facility; doing so does not mean that the facility will be in
compliance with the SPCC rule requirements. Nor is the sample plan a template that must be
followed in order for the facility to be considered in compliance with the SPCC rule.
                                                                       Version 1.0. 11^28/2005

-------
SPILL PREVENTION, CONTROL, AND COUNTERMEASURE PLAN
                Clearwater Oil Company

          Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility
                       5800 Route 417
             Madison, St. Anthony Parish, Louisiana 73506
                         Clearwater
                         Prepared by
                   Montgomery Engineering, Inc.

                      November 23, 2003
                                                   Version 1.0. 11/28/2005

-------
Clearwater Oil Company, Ltd                                SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and
Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility                               Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
                                  Table of Contents
                                                                                             Page
Cross-Reference with SPCC Rule                                                                    4
Introduction                                                                                       5
Management Approval                                                                              6
Professional Engineer Certification                                                                   6
Plan Review                                                                                      7
Location of SPCC Plan                                                                              7
Certification of Substantial Harm Determination                                                         8
Part I - General Facility Information
   1.1 Company Information                                                                         9
   1.2 Contact Information                                                                          9
   1.3 Facility Layout Diagram                                                                      10
   1.4 Facility Location and Operations                                                               10
   1.5 Oil Storage and Handling                                                                    11
   1,6 Proximity to Navigable Waters                                                                12
   1,7 Conformance with Applicable State and Local Requirements                                       12
Part II - Spill Response and Reporting
   2.1 Discharge Discovery and Reporting                                                            13
   2.2 Spill Response Materials                                                                    14
   2.3 Spill Mitigation Procedures                                                                   15
   2.4 Disposal Plan                                                                              16
Part III  -Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Provisions
   3.1 Potential Discharge Volume and Direction of Flow                                               18
   3.2 Containment and Diversionary Structures                                                       19
   3.3 Other Spill Prevention Measures                                                              22
   3.4 Inspections, Tests, and Records                                                              23
   3.5 Personnel, Training, and Discharge Prevention Procedures                                        27

Appendix A - Facility Diagrams                                                                     30
Appendix B - Tank Truck Loading Procedure                                                          32
Appendix C - Monthly Inspection Checklist                                                            33
Appendix D - Record of Dike  Drainage                                                               34
Appendix E - Discharge Prevention Briefing Log                                                       35
Appendix F - Discharge Notification Procedures                                                       36
Appendix G - Equipment Shut-off Procedures                                                         41
Appendix H - Written Commitment of Manpower, Equipment, and Materials                                42
Appendix I - Oil Spill Contingency Plan                                                               43

                                                -2-                                 Version 1.0. 11/28/2005

-------
Clearwater Oil Company, Ltd.
Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility
SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and
         Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
List of Tables
Table 0-1:  Record of plan review and changes
Table 1-1:  Facility contact information
Table 1-2:  Characteristics of oil containers
Table 3-1:  Potential discharge volume and direction of flow
Table 3-2:  Berm capacity calculations
Table 3-3:  Scope of daily examinations
Table 3-4:  Scope of monthly inspections
Table 3-5:  Schedule of periodic condition inspection of bulk storage containers
Table 3-6:  Components of flowline maintenance program
                                  Page

                                     7
                                    10
                                    11
                                    18
                                    21
                                    24
                                    25
                                    26
                                    27
List of Figures
Figure A-1: Site plan.
Figure A-2: Production facility diagram.
                                    30
                                    31
                                                 -3-
                                                                                      VersionLQ, 11/28/2005

-------
 Clearwater Oil Company, Ltd.
 Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility
SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and
       Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
                  Cross-Reference with SPCC Rule
Prbvtelon* :
112.3(d)
112.3(e>
112.5
112.7
112.7
112.7{a)(3)
11 2.4 and
112.7(a)(4>
112.7(a)(5)
112.7(b)
112.7(c)
112.7(d)
112.7(e)
112.7(f)
112.7(g)
112.7(h)
112.7(i)
112.70)
112.9(b)
112.9(c>(1)
112.9(c}(2)
112.9(c)(3)
112.9{c)(4)
112.9(3)
: - -rtaln Section ; p:; : : >? : • :y: • • ••'•';• • ;'- : . . ;;•..• vS: • • • v;;: • :. •;';.•' . c;::; . . :•:•'• :
Professional Engineer Certification
Location of SPCC Plan
Plan Review
Management Approval
Cross-Reference with SPCC Rule
Part I - General Information and Facility Diagram
Appendix A: Facility Diagrams
2.1 Discharge Discovery and Reporting
Appendix F: Discharge Notification
2.2 Spill Mitigation Procedures
Appendix 1: Oil Spill Contingency Plan
3.1 Potential Discharge Volume and Direction of Flow
3.2 Containment and Diversionary Structures
3.2.3 Practicability of Secondary Containment
Appendix H: Written Commitment of manpower, equipment, and materials
Appendix I: Oil Spill Contingency Plan
3.4 Inspections, Tests, and Records
Appendix C: Facility Inspection Checklists
3.5 Personnel, Training, and Discharge Prevention Procedures
Appendix E: Discharge Prevention Briefing Log
Security - N/A (does not apply to production facilities)
Loading/Unloading Rack - N/A (no rack present at this facility)
Brittle Fracture Evaluation - N/A (no fi eld-erected aboveground tank at this
facility)
1 .7 Conformance with Applicable State and Local Requirements
3.2.1 Oil Production Facility Drainage
Appendix D: Record of Dike Drainage
1.5.1 Production Equipment
3.2.2 Secondary Containment for Bulk Storage Containers
3.4 Inspections, Tests, and Records
Appendix C: Monthly Inspection Checklist
3.3.1 Bulk Storage Containers Overflow Prevention
3.3.2 Transfer Operations and Saltwater Disposal System
3.3.2 Transfer Operations and Saltwater Disposal System
3.4.5 Flowline Maintenance Program
Page(s)
6
7
7
6
4
9-12
Appendix A
13-15
Appendix F
15-16
Appendix I
18-19
19-21
21
Appendix H
Appendix I
23-26
Appendix C
27-29
Appendix E
N/A
N/A
26
12
20
Appendix D
11
19-21
23-26
Appendix C
22
22-23
22-23
26-27
* Only relevant rule provisions are indicated. For a complete list of SPCC requirements, refer to the
part 112.
                   full text of 40 CFR
                                        -4-
                                                                      versionl.O, 11/28/2005

-------
 Clearwater Oil Company, Ltd.
 Big Bear Lease Wo. 2 Production Facility
SAMPLE Spill Prevention. Control, and
       Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
                                  Introduction

The purpose of this Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan is to describe
measures implemented by Clearwater to prevent oil discharges from occurring, and to prepare
Clearwater to respond in a safe, effective, and timely manner to mitigate the impacts of a
discharge from the Big Bear Lease No. 2 production facility.  This SPCC Plan has been
prepared and implemented in accordance with the SPCC requirements contained in 40 CFR
part 112.

In addition to fulfilling requirements of 40 CFR part 112, this SPCC Plan is used as a reference
for oil storage information and testing records, as a tool to communicate practices on preventing
and responding to discharges with Clearwater employees and contractors, as a guide on facility
inspections, and as a resource during emergency response.
                                         -5-
                                                                       VersionlO, 11/28/2005

-------
 Cteanvafer Oil Company, Ltd.                           SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and
 Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility                         Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan


                          Management Approval
                                    40CFR112.7

Clearwater Oil Company ("Clearwater") is committed to maintaining the highest standards for
preventing discharges of oil to navigable waters and the environment through the
implementation of this SPCC Plan. This SPCC Plan has the full approval of Clearwater
management. Clearwater's management has committed the necessary resources to implement
the measures described in this Plan.

Bill Laurier is the Designated Person Accountable for Oil Spill Prevention at this Clearwater
facility and has the authority to commit the necessary resources to implement the Plan as
described.

Authorized Facility Representative:         Bill Laurier
Signature:                              (M &WWA,
Title:                                   Field Operations  Manager
Date:                                  November 23, 2003

                 Professional Engineer Certification
                                  40CFR112.3(d)

The undersigned Registered Professional Engineer is familiar with the requirements of Part 112
of Title 40  of the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR part 1  12) and has visited and examined
the facility, or has supervised examination of the facility by appropriately qualified personnel.
The undersigned Registered Professional Engineer attests that this Spill Prevention, Control,
and Countermeasure Plan has been prepared in accordance  with good engineering practice,
including consideration of applicable industry standards and the requirements of 40 CFR part
112; that procedures for required inspections and testing have been  established; and that this
Plan is adequate for the facility. [1 12.3(d)]

This certification in no way relieves the owner or operator of the facility of his/her duty to prepare
and fully implement this SPCC Plan in accordance with the requirements of 40 CFR part 1 12.
       £. lwM*4*>       November 23. 2003
Signature                  Date

Peter E. Trudeau. P.E.
Name of Professional Engineer

    90535055             Louisiana
Registration Number          Issuing State
Peter E. Trudeau
 LA #90535055
                                         -6-                           Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
 Clearwater Oil Company, Ltd.
 Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility
                                         SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and
                                                Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
                                  Plan Review
                                     40CFR112.5

In accordance with 40 CFR 112.5, Clearwater Oil periodically reviews and evaluates this SPCC
Plan for any change in the facility design, construction, operation, or maintenance that
materially affects the facility's potential for an oil discharge. Clearwater reviews this SPCC Plan
at least once every five years. Revisions to the Plan, if any are needed, are made within six
months of this five-year review. Clearwater will implement any amendment as soon as possible,
but not later than six months following preparation of any amendment. A registered PE certifies
any technical amendment to the Plan, as described above, in accordance with 40 CFR 112.3(d).

Scheduled five-year reviews and Plan amendments are recorded in Table 0-1. This log must be
completed even if no amendment is made to the  Plan. Unless a technical or administrative
change prompts an earlier review, the next scheduled review of this Plan must occur by
November 23, 2008.

              	Table 0-1: Record of Plan Review and Changes	
 Dat*
Authorized
Individual
Review Type
PE
Certification
Summary of Changes
 11/23/03     BillLaurier     Initial Plan            Yes

 04/14/04     BillLaurier     Off-cycle review       No
                                             N/A

                                             Changed telephone number for Field
                                             Operations Manager.
                                             Corrected page numbers in Table of
                                             Content.
                                             Non-technical amendments, no PE
                                             certification is needed.
                          Location  of SPCC Plan
                                   40 CFR 112.3(6)

In accordance with 40 CFR 112.3(e), and because the facility is normally unmanned, a
complete copy of this SPCC is maintained at the field office closest to the facility, which is
located approximately 25 miles from the facility at 2451 Mountain Drive, Ridgeview, LA.
Additional copies are available at the Clearwater Oil Company management office, located at
13000 Main Street, Suite 400, Houston, TX.
                                          -7-
                                                                        VersionlO, 11/28/2005

-------
 Clearwater Oil Company, Ltd.
 Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility
                                 SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and
                                        Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
         Certification of Substantial Harm Determination
                         40 CFR 112.20(e), 40 CFR 112.20(f)(1)
Facility Name:
Clearwater Oil Company, Big Bear Lease No. 2
1. Does the facility transfer oil over water to or from vessels and does the facility have a total oil
storage capacity greater than or equal to 42,000 gallons?
       Yes D              No •

2. Does the facility have a total oil storage capacity greater than or equal to 1 million gallons and
does the facility lack secondary containment that is sufficiently large to contain the capacity of
the largest aboveground oil storage tank plus sufficient freeboard to allow for precipitation within
any aboveground storage tank area?
       Yes D              No •

3. Does the facility have a total oil storage capacity greater than or equal to 1 million gallons and
is the facility located at a distance (as calculated using the appropriate formula) such that a
discharge from the facility could cause injury to fish and wildlife and sensitive environments?
       Yes D              No •

4. Does the facility have a total oil storage capacity greater than or equal to 1 million gallons and
is the facility located at a distance (as calculated using the appropriate formula) such that a
discharge from the facility would  shut down a public drinking water intake?
       Yes D              No •

5. Does the facility have a total oil storage capacity greater than or equal to 1 million gallons and
has the facility experienced a reportable oil spill in an amount greater than or equal to 10,000
gallons within the last 5 years?
       Yes D              No •

Certification
I certify under penalty of law that I have personally examined and am familiar with the
information submitted in this document, and that based on my inquiry of those individuals
responsible for obtaining this information, I believe that the submitted information is true,
accurate, and complete.
Signature

Bill Laurier
Name (type or print)
                    Field Operations Manager
                    Title

                    November 23, 2003
                    Date
                                          -8-
                                                                        Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
 Clearwater Oil Company, Ltd.
 Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility
                 SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and
                         Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
           PART I - GENERAL FACILITY INFORMATION
                                 40CFR112.7(a)(3)

1.1   Company Information
 Name of Facility:


 Type

 Date of Initial Operation

 Location


 Name and Address of Owner
Clearwater Oil Company
Big Bear Lease No. 2

Onshore oil production facility

2002

5800 Route 417
Madison, St. Anthony Parish, Louisiana 73506

Clearwater Oil Company

Regional Field Office
2451 Mountain Drive
Ridgeview, LA 70180

Corporate Headquarters
13000 Main Street, Suite 400
Houston, TX 77077
1.2   Contact Information

The designated person accountable for overall oil spill prevention and response at the facility,
also referred to as the facility's "Response Coordinator" (RC), is the Field Operations Manager,
Bill Laurier. 24-hour contact information is provided in Table 1-1.

Personnel from Avonlea Services Inc. ("Avonlea") provide operations (pumper/gauger) support
activities to Clearwater field personnel, including performing informal daily examinations of the
facility equipment, as described in Section 3.4 of this SPCC Plan. Avonlea personnel regularly
visit the facility to record production levels and perform other maintenance/inspection activities
as requested by the Clearwater Field Operations Manager. Key contacts for Avonlea are
included in Table 1-1,
                                        -9-
                                                                     Versionl 0.11/28/2005

-------
 C/eanvafer 0/7 Company, Ltd.
 Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility
SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and
        Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
                           Table 1-1: Facility contact information
:::Name-:;:::;::-:" : : '-J:P':
Lester Pearson
Carol Campbell
Bill Laurier
Joe Clark
William Mackenzie
'• : Tii;rh • • : • • ' •
Vice-President of
Operations
Clearwater Oil Co.
Regional Director of
Operations
Clearwater Oil Co.
Field Operations
Manager
Clearwater Oil Co.
Field Supervisor
Avonlea Services, Inc.
Pumper
Avonlea Services, Inc.
Telephone
(555)-289-4500
(405) 83 1-6320 (office)
(405) 83 1-2262 (cell)
(405) 831 -6322 (office)
(405)829-4051 (cell)
(406) 545-2285 (office)
(406) 549-9087 (cell)
(406) 549-9087 (cell)
Address
13000 Main Street, Suite 400
Houston, TX 77077
2451 Mountain Drive
Ridgeview, LA 701 80
2451 Mountain Drive
Ridgeview, LA 701 80
786 Cherry Creek Road
Avonlea, LA 701 80
786 Cherry Creek Road
Avonlea, LA 70180
1.3    Facility Layout Diagram

Appendix A, at the end of this Plan, shows a general site plan for the facility. The site plan
shows the site topography and the location of the facility relative to waterways, roads, and
inhabited areas. Appendix A also includes a detailed facility diagram that shows the wells,
flowlines, tank battery, and transfer areas for the facility. The diagram shows the location,
capacity, and contents of all oil storage containers greater than 55 gallons in capacity.

1.4    Facility Location and Operations

Clearwater owns and operates the Big Bear Lease No. 2 production facility, which is located
approximately six miles north of Madison, St. Anthony Parish, Louisiana (see Figure A-1 in
Appendix A). The site is accessed through a private dirt/gravel road off Route 417.

As illustrated in Figure A-2 in Appendix A, the facility is comprised of five main areas: Well A,
Well B, the saltwater disposal well, flowlines, and a tank battery. The tank battery includes three
400-barrel (bbl) oil storage tanks, one 500-bbl produced water tank, one 500-bbl gun barrel, and
associated flowlines and piping.

The production  facility is generally unmanned. Clearwater's field office is located 25 miles from
the site, at 2541 Mountain Drive, Ridgeview, Louisiana. Field operations personnel from
Clearwater, or pumpers acting as contractors to Clearwater visit the facility daily (2-4 hours each
day) to record production rates and ensure the proper functioning of wellhead equipment and
pumpjacks, storage tanks, flowlines, and separation vessels. This includes performing
equipment inspections and maintenance as needed.
                                          -10-
                                                                          VersionlQ, 11/28/2005

-------
  Clearwater Oil Company, Ltd.
  Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility
SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and
       Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
The facility produces an average of 30 bbl (1,260 gallons) of crude oil (approximately 40 API
gravity) and 140 bbl (5,880 gallons) of produced water each day. The produced water tank
contains an oil/produced water mixture. It is subject to 40 CFR part 112 and is covered by this
SPCC Plan.

1.5    Oil Storage and Handling

1.5.1   Production Equipment

Oil storage at the facility consists of one (1) 500-bbl gun barrel, three (3) 400-bbl aboveground
storage tanks, one (1) 500-bbl produced water tank, and associated piping, as summarized in
Table 1-2. The total oil capacity at this facility is 2,200 bbl (92,400 gallons).

All oil storage tanks are shop-built and meet the American Petroleum Institute (API) tank
construction standard. Their design and construction are compatible with the oil they contain
and the temperature and pressure conditions of storage. Tanks storing crude or produced oil
(#1 through #4) are constructed of welded steel following API-12F Shop Welded Tanks for
Storage of Production Liquids specifications. Steel tanks are coated to minimize corrosion. Tank
holding produced water (#5) constructed of fiberglass following API-12P Fiberglass Reinforced
Plastic Tanks specifications.

Other production equipment present at the facility include the pumpjacks at each well and water
pumps for transfer of saltwater to the injection well. These store a minimal amount of lubricating
oil (less than 55 gallons). Lubricating oil and other substances, such as solvents and chemicals
for downhole treatment,  are also stored at the facility, but in quantities below the 55-gallon
threshold for SPCC applicability. Table 1-2  lists all oil containers present at the facility with
capacity of 55 gallons or more.

                         Table 1-2: Characteristics of oil containers
ID
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5

Type
Gun barrel
AST
AST
AST
AST

Construct
ton
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Fiberglass

Primary
Content
Oil
Oil
Oil
Oil
Produced water
and oil mixture
TOTAL
Capacity
(barrtrtij
500
400
400
400
500
2.200
Capacity
(gallons)
21,000
16,800
16,800
16,800
21 ,000
92,400
                                          -11-
                                                                          Version 1.0.11/28/2005

-------
 Clearwater Oil Company, Ltd,                            SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and
 Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility                           Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan

1.5.2   Transfer Activities

Wells A and B produce crude oil, produced water (saltwater), and small amounts of natural gas.
The oil and water are produced through the tubing, while the natural gas is produced through
the casing. Well liquids are then routed via 2-inch steel flowlines to the gun barrel tank for
separation, while the gas is sent to a flare. Produced saltwater is routed from the gun barrel to
the 500-bbl saltwater storage tank first, then is pumped through flowlines to the saltwater
disposal well where it is injected.  The disposal well is located approximately 2,000 ft to the west
of the tank battery. The crude oil  is sent to the three 400-bbt (16,800-gallon)  oil storage tanks.

Crude oil from the lease is purchased by Clearwater's crude oil purchaser and transported from
the facility by the purchaser's tanker truck. Although daily well production rates may vary,
enough crude is produced and stored for approximately one 180-bbl (7,560-gallon) load of oil to
be picked up weekly by the transporter. The largest tanker truck visiting the facility has a total
capacity of 210 bbl {8,820 gallons). Tanker trucks come to the facility only to transfer crude oil
and do not remain at the facility. All transfer operations are attended by the trucker or by field
operations personnel and meet the minimum requirements of the U.S. Department of
Transportation Hazardous Materials Regulations. Appendix B to this Plan summarizes the Tank
Truck Loading Procedure at this facility.

Produced saltwater is pumped via transfer pumps from the saltwater tank to the saltwater
disposal well, located approximately 2,000 feet west of the facility, by 2-inch PVC flowlines
(FLSW). The disposal well meets all requirements of the Underground Injection Control (UIC)
program (40 CFR parts 144-148).

1.6    Proximity to Navigable Waters

The facility is located within the Mines River watershed, approximately half a  mile to the west of
Big Bear Creek, and six miles North of the Mines River. The wells and tank battery are situated
on relatively level ground that slopes in a general southeastern direction. The site plan in Figure
A-1 in Appendix A shows the location of the facility relative to nearby waterways. The facility
diagram included in Figure A-2 in Appendix A indicates the general direction of drainage. In the
event of an uncontrolled discharge from the wells, flowlines, or the tank battery areas, oil would
follow the natural topography of the site and flow into Big Bear Creek. Big Bear Creek meets
with the Mines River to the south just before the town of Madison. The River then flows in a
general easterly direction following Route 101.

1.7    Conformance with Applicable State and Local Requirements [112.70)]

The SPCC regulation at 40 CFR part 112 is more stringent than requirements from the  state of
Louisiana for this type of facility. This SPCC Plan was written to conform with 40 CFR part 112
requirements. The facility thereby conforms with general requirements for oil  pollution facilities
in Louisiana. All discharge notifications are made in compliance with local, state, and federal
requirements.
                                          -12-                            Version 1.0.11/28/2005

-------
 Clearwater Oil Company, Ltd
 Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility
SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and
       Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
          PART II.  SPILL RESPONSE AND REPORTING
                                    40CFR112.7

2.1    Discharge Discovery and Reporting [112.7(a)(3)J

Several individuals and organizations must be contacted in the event of an oil discharge. The
Field Operations Manager is responsible for ensuring that all required discharge notifications
have been made. All discharges should be reported to the Field Operations Manager. The
summary table included in Appendix F to this SPCC Plan provides a list of agencies to be
contacted under different  circumstances. Discharges would typically be discovered during the
inspections conducted at  the facility in accordance with procedures set forth in Section 3.4.1 of
this SPCC Plan, Table 3-3 and Table 3-4, and on the checklist of Appendix C. The Form
included in Appendix F of this  Plan summarizes the information that must be provided when
reporting a discharge, including contact lists and phone numbers.

2.1.1   Verbal Notification  Requirements (Local, State, and Federal (40 CFR part 110))

Any unauthorized discharge into air, land or water must be reported immediately to the State
Police and the Emergency Planning Commission as soon as the discharge is detected.

For any discharge that reaches navigable waters, or threatens to reach navigable waters,
immediate notification must  be made to the National Response Center Hotline  (800-424-8802)
and to the Environmental  Protection Agency.

In the event of a discharge that threatens to result in an emergency condition, facility field
personnel must verbally notify the Louisiana Emergency Hazardous Materials Hotline (225-
925-6595) immediately, and in no case later than within one (1) hour of the discovery of the
discharge.  An emergency condition is any condition that could reasonably be expected to
endanger the health and safety of the public;  cause significant adverse impact to the land,
water, or air environment; or cause severe damage to property. This notification must be made
regardless of the amount  of the discharge.

In the event of a discharge that does not present an emergency situation, verbal notification
must be made to the Office  of Environmental Compliance (by telephone at 225-763-3908 during
office hours or 225-342-1234 after hours, weekends, and holidays; or by e-mail utilizing the
Incident Report Form and procedures found at www.deq.state.la.us/surveillance) within twenty-
four (24) hours of the discovery of the discharge.

2.1.2   Written Notification Requirements (State and Federal (40 CFR part 112))

A written notification will be  made to EPA for any single discharge of oil to a navigable waters or
adjoining shoreline waterway of more than 1,000 gallons, or for two discharges of  1 bbl (42
gallons) of oil to a waterway in any 12-month period. This written notification must  be made
within 60 days of the qualifying discharge, and a copy will be sent to the Louisiana Department
of Environmental Quality  (DEQ), which is the state agency in charge of oil pollution control
                                        -13-
                                                                      Version 1.0. 11/28/2005

-------
 C/earwafer OH Company. Ltd.                            SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and
 Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility	Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan

activities. This reporting requirement is separate and in addition to reporting under 40 CFR part
110 discussed above.

For any discharge reported verbally, a written notification must also be sent to the DEQ and to
the St. Anthony's Parish Local Emergency Planning Committee (LEPC), both within five (5)
days of the qualifying discharge.

A written notification to the State Emergency Response Commission or LEPC is required for a
discharge of 100 Ibs or more beyond the confines of the facility (equivalent to 2 mcf of natural
gas, or 13 gallons of oil) within five (5) days of the qualifying discharge.

2.1.3   Submission of SPCC Information

Whenever the facility experiences a discharge into navigable waters of more than 1,000 gallons,
or two discharges of 42 gallons or more within a 12-month period, Clearwater will provide
information in writing to the EPA Region 6 office within 60 days of a qualifying discharge as
described above. The required information is described in Appendix F of this SPCC Plan.

2.2    Spill Response Materials

Boom, sorbent, and other spill response materials are stored in the shed next to the loading
area and are accessible by Clearwater and Avonlea personnel. The response equipment
Inventory for the facility includes:

       (4)           Empty 55-galtons drums to hold contaminated material
       (3)           50-ft absorbent socks
       (4)           10-ft sections of hard skirted deployment boom
       (2)           50-ft floating booms
       (200 pounds) "Oil-dry" loose absorbent material
       (4 boxes)     2 ft x 3 ft absorbent pads
       (3 boxes)     Nitrile gloves
       (3 boxes)     Neoprene gloves
       (6 pairs)      Vinyl/PVC pull-on overboots
       (3)           Non-sparking shovels
       (3)           Brooms
       (20)          Sand  bags
       (1)           Combustible Gas Indicator with H2S detection  capabilities

Additional equipment and material are also kept at the field office. The inventory  is checked
monthly by Clearwater field operations personnel to ensure that used material is  replenished.
Supplies and equipment may be ordered  from:

       (1)     Rocky Mountain Equipment Co. (800) 959-3000
       (2)     Quick Sorbent (800) 857-4650.
                                          -14-                            Version 1.0.11/28/2005

-------
  Ctearwater Oil Company, Ltd.
  Big Bear Lease No, 2 Production Facility
   SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and
          Counter/measure (SPCC) Plan
2.3    Spill Mitigation Procedures

The following is a summary of actions that must be
taken in the event of a discharge. It summarizes the
distribution of responsibilities among individuals and
describes procedures to follow in the event of a
discharge.

A complete outline of actions to be performed in the
event of a discharge from flowlines reaching or
threatening to reach navigable waters is included in
the facility Contingency Plan (see Appendix I of this
SPCC Plan).
Reminder: In the event of a discharge
originating from Flowline A or Flow/line B,
facility personnel must immediately
implement the Oil Spill Contingency Plan.
The Oil Spill Contingency Plan discusses
the additional procedures that must be
followed to respond to a discharge of oil to
navigable waters or adjoining shorelines.
In the event of a discharge, Clearwater or contractor field personnel and the Field Operations
Manager shall be responsible for the following:

2.3.1   Shut Off Ignition Sources

Field personnel must shut off all ignition sources, including motors, electrical circuits, and open
flames. See Appendix G for more information about shut-off procedures.

2.3.2   Stop Oil Flow

Field personnel should determine the source of the discharge, and if safe to do so, immediately
shut off the source of the discharge. Shut in the well(s) if necessary.

2.3.3   Stop the Spread of Oil and Call the Field Operations Manager

If safe to do so, field personnel must use resources available  at the facility (see spill response
material and equipment listed in Section 2.2) to stop  the spilled material from spreading.
Measures that may be implemented, depending on the location and size of the discharge,
include placing sorbent material or other barriers in the path of the discharge (e.g., sand bags),
or constructing earthen berms or trenches.

In the event of a significant discharge, field personnel must immediately contact the Field
Operations Manager, who may obtain assistance from authorized company contractors and
direct the response and cleanup activities. Should a discharge reach Big Bear Creek, only
physical response and countermeasures should be employed, such as the construction of
underflow dams, installation of hard boom and  sorbent boom, use of sorbent pads, and use of
vacuum trucks to recover oil and oily water from the creek. If water flow is low in the creek,
construction of an underflow dam downstream  and ahead of the spill flow may be
advantageous. Sorbent material and/or boom should be placed immediately downstream of the
dam to recover any sheen from the water. If water flow is normal in the creek, floating booms
and sorbent boom will be deployed. Vacuum trucks will then be utilized to remove oil and oily
                                          -15-
                                                                         VersionlO, 11/28/2005

-------
 Clearwater Oil Company, Ltd.                            SAMPLE Spill Prevention. Control, and
 Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility	Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan

water at dams and other access points. Crews should remove oiled vegetation and debris from
the creek banks and place them in bags for later disposal. After removal of contaminated
vegetation, creek banks should be flushed with water to remove free oil and help it flow down to
dams and other access points where it can be recovered by vacuum truck. At no time shall any
surfactants, dispersants, or other chemicals be used to remove oil from the creek.

2.3.4   Gather Spill Information

The Field Operations Manager will ensure that the Discharge Notification Form is filled out and
that notifications have been made to the appropriate authorities. The Field Operations Manager
may ask for assistance in  gathering the spill information on the Discharge Notification Form
(Appendix F)  of this Plan:

             Reporter's  name
             Exact location of the spill
             Date and time of spill discovery
             Material spilled (e.g., oil, produced water containing a reportable quantity of oil)
       *      Total volume spilled and total volume reaching or threatening navigable waters or
             adjoining shorelines
             Weather conditions
             Source of spill
             Actions being taken to stop, remove, and mitigate the effects  of the discharge
       •      Whether an evacuation may be needed
             Spill impacts (injuries; damage; environmental media, e.g., air, waterway,
             groundwater)
             Names of individuals and/or organizations who have also been contacted

2.3.5   Notify Agencies Verbally

Some notifications must be completed immediately upon discovering the discharge. It is
important to immediately contact the Field Operations Manager so that timely notifications can
be made. If the Field Operations Manager is not available, or the Field Operations Manager
requests it, field personnel must designate one person to begin notification. Section 2.1 of this
Plan describes the required notifications to government agencies.  The Notification List is
included in Appendix F of this SPCC Plan. The Field Operations Manager must also ensure that
written notifications, if needed, are submitted to the appropriate agencies.

2.4    Disposal Plan

The cleanup contractor will handle the disposal of any recovered product, contaminated soil,
contaminated materials and equipment,  decontamination solutions, sorbents, and spent
chemicals collected during a response to a discharge incident.
                                          -16-                            Version 1 0. 11/28/2005

-------
 Clearwater Oil Company, Ltd.
 Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility
SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and
        Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
Any recovered product that can be recycled will be placed into the gun barrel tank to be
separated and recycled. Any recovered product not deemed suitable for on-site recycling will be
disposed of with the rest of the waste collected during the response efforts.

If the facility responds to a discharge without involvement of a cleanup contractor, Clearwater
will contract a licensed transportation/disposal company to dispose of waste according to
regulatory requirements. The Field Operations Manager will characterize the waste and arrange
for the use of certified waste containers.

All facility personnel handling hazardous wastes must have received both the initial 40-hour
and annual 8-hour refresher training in the Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency
Response Standard (HAZWOPER) of the Occupational Health and Safety Administration
(OSHA). This training is included as part of the initial training received by all field personnel.
Training records and certificates are kept at the field office.
                                          -17-
                                                                          Version 10, 11/28/2005

-------
 Ctearwater Oil Company, Ltd.
 Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility
                                    SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and
                                          Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
3.1
  PART III. SPILL PREVENTION, CONTROL, AND
        COUNTERMEASURE PROVISIONS
                    40 CFR 112.7 and 112.9

Potential Discharge Volume and Direction of Flow [112.7(b)] and
Containment [112.7(a)(3)(iii)]
Table 3-1, below, summarizes potential oil discharge scenarios. If unimpeded, oil would follow
the site topography and reach Big Bear Creek.

             Table 3-1: Potential discharge volume and direction of flow
Source : 1 fy|ii of fajjfure "Maximum Maximum; 0i»iBti6n of FloVif
Volume Discharge
:.. • - - • - •',•':...• -.'••• ' • :': « :.:-,. . : . (gal) : .:•• : : : . Rate (gal/hr) . : ::;:.;-: : . : :-/:;:: : : • .:-.•;••:.: . .
: . • • • • . . •. : • • . • -. :• - • . ; . . . • *'" * •••.•••.• ...... '•• •::••* .••..••. 	 ••:::: .
Tank Battery
Crude Oil Storage Tank


Gun barrel


Flowlines and Piping
Flowlines and Piping on
Storage Tanks and Gun
Barrel

Flowlines and Piping
associated with wells

Rupture due to 1 6,800
lightning strike,
seam failure
Leak at manway, 24
valves
Overflow (1 day's 1,260
production)
Rupture due to 21,000
lightning strike,
seam failure
Leak at manway, 42
valves
Overflow (1 day's 7,1 40
production)

Rupture/failure 3,570
due to corrosion
Pinhole leak, or 48
leak at
connection
Rupture/failure 3,570
due to corrosion

16,800 Southeast towards Big
Bear Creek.
1 Southeast towards Big
Bear Creek.
53 Southeast towards Big
Bear Creek.
21 ,000 Southeast towards Big
Bear Creek.
2 Southeast towards Big
Bear Creek.
298 Southeast towards Big
Bear Creek.

148 Southeast towards Big
Bear Creek.
2 Southeast towards Big
Bear Creek.
148 Southeast towards Big
Bear Creek.
Containment

Containment
berm


Containment
berm

Containment
berm

Containment
berm

None; See Oil
Spill
Contingency
Plan
                                 -18-
                                                         Version 1.0. 11/28/2005

-------
  Clearwater Oil Company, Ltd.
  Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility
SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and
       Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
source

Wells
Polished rod stuffing box
valves, fittings, gauges
Saltwater Disposal
Piping/hoses, pumps,
valves
Transfers and Loading
Transport truck loading
hose
Offload line, connection
Tank truck
Transfer valve
Type of failure
Pinhole leak, or
leak at
connection

Leak

Leak
Operations
Rupture
Leak
Over-topping
while loading
Rupture, leak of
valve packing
Maximum Maximum Direction of Flow
Volume Discharge
(gal) Rate (gal/hr)
48 2 Southeast towards Big
Bear Creek.

24 1 Southeast towards Big
Bear Creek.

24 1 Southeast towards Big
Bear Creek.

84 84 Southeast towards Big
Bear Creek.
42 1 Southeast towards Big
Bear Creek.
1,680 1,680 Southeast towards Big
Bear Creek.
3 3 Southeast towards Big
Bear Creek.
Containment
None; See Oil
Spill
Contingency
Plan

Well pad

Containment
berm

Downslope
berm
Downslope
berm
Drainage ditch
Load line
container, curb
3.2    Containment and Diversionary Structures [112.7(c) and 112.7(a)(3)(iii)]

The facility is configured to minimize the likelihood of a discharge reaching navigable waters.
The following measures are provided:

             Secondary containment for the oil storage tanks, saltwater tank (which may have
             small amounts of oil), and gun barrel is provided by a 60 ft x 40 ft x 2.5 ft earthen
             berm that provides a total containment volume of 867 barrels (36,423 gallons), as
             described in Section 3.2.2 below. The berm is constructed of native soils and
             heavy clay that have been compacted, then covered with gravel. A clay layer in
             the shallow subsurface exists naturally and will stop any spilled oil from seeping
             to deeper groundwater.

       •      The tank truck loading area is flat but gently slopes to the southeast, where a
             crescent-shaped, open berm has been placed to catch any potential spills from
             tanker transport trucks. The bermed area provides a catchment basin of 40
             barrels (1,680 gallons), the maximum expected amount of a spill from the tanker
             due to overtopping of the truck during loading. In addition, the end of the load line
             is equipped with  a load line drip bucket designed to prevent small discharges that
             may occur when disconnecting the hose.
                                         -19-
                                                                        Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
 Clearwater Oil Company, Ltd.
 Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility
SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and
        Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
       •       Booms, sorbents, shovels, and other discharge response materials are stored in
              a shed located in close proximity to the loading area. This material is sufficient to
              contain small discharges (up to approximately 200 gallons).

These measures are described in more details in the following sections.

3.2.1   Oil Production Facility Drainage [112.9(b)]

Facility drainage in the production/separation area but outside containment berms is designed
to flow into drainage ditches located on the eastern and southern boundaries of the site. These
ditches usually run dry. The ditches are visually examined by facility personnel on a daily basis
during routine facility rounds, during formal monthly inspections, and after rain events, to detect
any discoloration or staining that would indicate the presence of oil from small leaks within the
facility. Any accumulation of oil is promptly removed and disposed off site. Formal monthly
inspections are documented.

Discharges from ASTs are restrained by the secondary containment berm, as described in
Section 3.2.2 of this Plan. Discharges occurring during transfer operations will be contained at
each well by the rock pad or will flow into the drainage ditch located at the facility.

3.2.2   Secondary Containment for Bulk Storage Containers [112.9(c)(2)]

In order to further minimize the potential for a discharge to navigable waters, bulk storage
containers such as all tank battery,  separation, and treating equipment are placed inside a 2.5-ft
tall earthen berm (fire wall). The berm capacity exceeds the SPCC and Louisiana requirements.
It provides secondary containment sufficient for the size of the largest tank, plus at least 1 ft of
freeboard to contain precipitation. This secondary containment capacity is equivalent to 173
percent of the capacity of the largest tank within the containment area (500 barrels) and
exceeds the 10 percent freeboard recommended by API for firewalls around production tanks
(AP1-12R1). The amount of freeboard also exceeds the amount of precipitation anticipated at
this facility, which is estimated to average 3.5 inches for a 24-hour, 25-year storm, based on
data from the nearby Ridgeview Regional Airport. Details of the berm capacity calculation are
provided in Table  3-2.
                                          -20-
                                                                          Version 1.0.11/28/2005

-------
  C/earwafer Oil Company, Ltd.
  Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility
                                SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and
                                        Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
                           Table 3-2: Berm capacity calculations
  Berm Capacity

  Berm height

  Berm dimensions

  Tank footprint
                 2.5ft

                 60 ft x 40 ft = 2,400 ft2

                 4 tanks @ 12 ft dia. each = 4 x (n 122/4) = 452 ft2

       Net volume  2.5 ft x (2,400 - 452)  = 4,869 ft3 = 36,423 gallons

Ratio to largest tank  36,423 / 21,000 = 173%
 Corresponding Amount of Freeboard

 100% of tank volume

 Net area (minus tank footprint)

 Minimum berm height for 100% of tank volume

 Freeboard
                 21,000 gallons = 2,807 ft3

                 2,400 ft2-452 ft2 =1,948 ft2

                 2,807 fP / 1,948 fP= 1.44 ft

                 2.5 ft-1.44 ft = 1.06 ft
The floor and walls of the berm are constructed of compacted earth with a layer of clay that
ensures that the berm is able to contain the potential release of oil from the storage tanks until
the discharge can be detected and addressed by field operations personnel. Facility personnel
inspect the berm daily for the presence of oil. The sides of the berm are capped with gravel to
minimize erosion.

The berm is equipped with a manual valve of open-and-closed design. The valve is used to
drain the berm and is  normally kept closed, except when draining water accumulation within the
berm. Drainage from the berm flows into the drainage ditch to the south of the production/
separation area. All water is closely inspected by field operations personnel (who are the
persons providing "responsible supervision") prior to draining water accumulation to ensure that
no free oil is present (i.e., there is no sheen or discoloration upon the surface, or a sludge or
emulsion deposit beneath the surface of the water). The bypass  valve for the containment
structure is opened and reseated following drainage under the responsible supervision of field
operations personnel. Free oil is promptly removed and disposed of in accordance with waste
regulations.  Drainage events are recorded on the form provided  in Appendix D, including the
time, date, and name  of the employee who performed the drainage. The records are maintained
with this SPCC Plan at the Ridgeview field office for a period of at least three years.

3.2.3   Practicability of Secondary Containment [112.7(d)]

Flowlines adjacent to the production equipment and storage tanks are located within the berm,
and therefore have secondary containment. Aboveground flowlines that go from the wells to the
production equipment and buried flowlines,  however, lack adequate secondary containment.

The installation of double-wall piping, berms, or other permanent structures (e.g., remote
impoundment) are impracticable at this facility due to the long distances involved and physical
                                          -21-
                                                                           Version 1.0.11/28/2005

-------
 Clearwater Oil Company, Ltd.
 Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility
SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and
       Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
and road/fenceline right-of-way constraints. Additionally, such permanent structures would
create land erosion and access problems for the landowner's farming operations and current
uses of the land (e.g., agricultural production, animal grazing).

Other measures listed under 40 CFR 112.7(c) such as the use of sorbents are also
impracticable as means of secondary containment since the volumes involved may exceed the
sorbent capacity and the facility is attended for only a few hours each day.

Because secondary containment for flowlines outside of the tank battery is impracticable,
Clearwater has provided with this Plan additional elements required under 40 CFR 112.7(d),
including:

             A written commitment of manpower, equipment, and materials required to
             expeditiously control and remove any quantity of oil discharged that may be
             harmful (see Appendix H).
             An  Oil Spill Contingency Plan following the provisions of 40 CFR 109 (see
             Appendix I).

3.3    Other Spill Prevention Measures

3.3.1   Bulk Storage Containers Overflow Prevention [112.9(c)(4)]

The tank battery is designed with a fail-safe system to prevent discharge, as follows:

             The capacity of the oil storage tanks is sufficient to ensure that oil storage is
             adequate in the event where facility personnel are unable to perform the daily
             visit to unload the tanks or the pumper is delayed in stopping production. The
             maximum capacity of the wells linked to the tank battery is approximately 600
             barrels per day. The oil tanks are sized to provide sufficient storage for at least
             two days.

             The tanks are connected with overflow equalizing lines to ensure that a full tank
             can overflow to an adjacent tank.

3.3.2   Transfer Operations and Saltwater Disposal System [112.9{d)]

All aboveground valves and piping associated with transfer operations are inspected daily by
the pumper and/or tank truck driver, as described in Section 3.4 of this Plan. The inspection
procedure includes observing flange joints, valve glands and bodies, drip pans, and pipe
supports. The conditions of the pumping well polish rod stuffing boxes, and bleeder and gauge
valves, are inspected monthly.

Components of the produced water disposal system are inspected on a monthly basis by field
operation personnel as described in Section 3.4 and following the checklist provided in
Appendix C of this SPCC Plan. This includes the pumps and motors for working condition and
                                         -22-
                                                                         VersionVO, 11/28/2005

-------
  Clearwater Oil Company, Ltd.
  Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility
SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and
       Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
leaks, hoses, valves, flowlines, and the saltwater injection wellhead. Maintenance and operation
of the well itself and the downhole injection comply with EPA's and the state's Underground
Injection Control (UIC) rules and regulations (40 CFR parts 144-148).

3.4    Inspections, Tests, and Records [112.7(e)J

This Plan outlines procedures for inspecting the facility equipment in accordance with SPCC
requirements. Records  of inspections performed as described in this Plan and signed by the
appropriate supervisor are a part of this Plan, and are maintained with this Plan at the
Ridgeview field office for a minimum of three years. The reports include a description of the
inspection procedure, the date of inspection, whether drainage of accumulated rainwater was
required, and the inspector's signature.

The program established  in this SPCC Plan for regular inspection of all oil storage tanks and
related production and transfer equipment follows the American Petroleum Institute's
Recommended Practice for Setting Maintenance,  Inspection, Operation,  and Repair of Tanks in
Production Service (API RP 12R1, Fifth Edition, August 1997). Each container is inspected
monthly by field operation personnel as described in this Plan section and following the
checklist provided in Appendix C  of this SPCC Plan. The monthly inspection is aimed at
identifying signs of deterioration and maintenance needs, including the foundation and support
of each container. Any leak from tank seams, gaskets, rivets, and bolts is promptly corrected.

This Plan also describes provisions for monitoring the integrity of flowlines through a
combination of monthly visual inspections and periodic pressure testing or through the use of an
alternate technology. The latter element is particularly important for this facility since flowlines
do not have adequate secondary containment.

The inspection program is comprised of informal daily examinations, monthly scheduled
inspections, and periodic condition inspections. Additional inspections and/or examinations are
performed whenever an operation alert, malfunction, shell or deck leak, or potential bottom leak
is reported following a scheduled examination. Written examination/inspection procedures and
monthly examination/inspection reports are signed by the field inspector and are maintained at
the field office for a period of at least three years.

3.4.1  Daily Examinations

The facility is visited daily by field operations personnel. The daily visual examination consists of
a walkthrough of the tank battery and around the wells. Field operations personnel  check  the
wells and production equipment for leaks and proper operation. They examine all aboveground
valves, polished rod stuffing boxes, wellheads, fittings, gauges, and flowline piping at the
wellhead. Personnel inspect pumps to verify proper function and check for damage  and
leakage.  They look for accumulation of water within the tank battery berms and verify the
condition and position of valves. The storage tanks are gauged every day. A daily production
report is maintained. All malfunctions, improper operation of equipment, evidence of leakage,
                                          -23-
                                                                         Version 1 0, 11/28/2005

-------
 Clearwater Oil Company, Ltd.
 Big Bear Lease No, 2 Production Facility
                                    SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and
                                            Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
stained or discolored soil, etc. are logged and communicated to the Clearwater Field Operations
Manager.

	Table 3-3: Scope of daily examinations	
 Facility Area
item
Observations
 Storage Tanks (Oil
 and Produced water)
Leaks
 Wells
 SW Pumps
                     Foundation problems
                     Flowlines problems
Leak
Leaks
Tank liquid level gauged
Drip marks, leaks from weld seams, base of tank
Puddles containing spilled or leak material
Corrosion, especially at base (pitting, flaking)
Cracks in metal
Excessive soil or vegetation buildup against base

Cracks
Puddles containing spilled or leaked material
Settling
Gaps at base

Evidence of leaks, especially at connections/collars
Corrosion (pitting, flaking)
Settling
Evidence of stored material seepage from valves or
seals

Evidence of oil seepage from pumping rod stuffing
boxes, wellhead and wellhead flowlines, valves, gauges

Leaks at seals, flowlines, valves, hoses
Puddles containing spilled or leaked material
Corrosion
3.4.2  Monthly Inspections

Table 3-4 summarizes the scope of monthly inspections performed by field personnel.

The monthly inspection covers the wellheads, flowlines, and all processing equipment. It also
includes verifying the proper functioning of all detection devices, including high-level sensors on
oil storage tanks, heater treater, and separators. Storage tanks are inspected for signs of
deterioration, leaks, or accumulation of oil inside the containment area, or other signs that
maintenance or repairs are needed. The secondary containment area is checked for proper
drainage, general conditions, evidence of oil, or signs of leakage. The monthly inspection also
involves visually inspecting all aboveground valves and pipelines and noting the general
condition of items such as transfer hoses, flange joints, expansion joints, valve  glands and
bodies, catch pans, pipeline supports, pumping well pumping rod stuffing boxes, bleeder and
gauge valves, locking of valves, and metal surfaces.

The checklist provided in Appendix C is used during monthly inspections. These inspections are
performed in accordance with written procedures such as API  standards (e.g., API RP 12R1),
engineering specifications, and maintenance schedule developed by the equipment
manufacturers.
                                            -24-
                                                                             Version 1.0. 11/28/2005

-------
  Clearwater Oil Company, Ltd.
  Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility
                                     SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and
                                             Counter-measure (SPCC; Plan
All safety devices are tested quarterly by a third party inspector. The tests are recorded and the
results are maintained with this Plan at Clearwater's field office. Testing of the safety devices is
conducted in accordance with guidelines API RP-14C published by the American Petroleum
Institute, or in accordance with instructions from the device's manufacturer. Written test
procedures are kept at the offices of the third party testing company and are available upon
request.

Twice a year, facility personnel  drive to the pre-established response staging areas located at
three different points along Big Bear Creek (see Oil Spill Contingency Plan in Appendix I) to
ensure that the dirt/gravel roads are accessible using field vehicles and that the Oil Spill
Contingency Plan can be implemented in the event of a discharge from fiowlines reaching the
Creek.
                            Table 3-4: Scope of monthly inspections
 FaellftyArea
Equipment
Inspection Item
 Tank Battery
Storage tanks
                     Area
 Truck Loading
 Wells (including
 saltwater disposal
 well)
Offload lines, drip pans,
valves, catchment berm
                     Production equipment
Area
Leakage, gaskets, hatches
Tank liquid level checked
Tank welds in good condition
Vacuum vents
Overflow lines
Piping, vafves, and bull plugs
Corrosion, paint condition
Pressure / level safety devices*
Emergency shut-down system(s)*
Pressure relief valves*

Berm and curbing
Presence of contaminated/stained soil
Excessive vegetation
Equipment protectors and  signs
Engine drip pans and sumps
General housekeeping

Valve dosed and in good condition
Cap or bull plug at end of offload line/connection
Sign of oil or standing water in drip pan(s)
Sign of oil or standing water in catchment berm
Sign of oil in surrounding area

Gauges (pressure, temperature, and liquid level)
Pressure / level safety devices*
Emergency shut-down system(s)*
Pressure relief valves*

Spills and leaks (e.g., stuffing box)
Equipment protectors and  signs
General housekeeping
                                             -25-
                                                                                VersionlO, 11/28/2005

-------
 Clearwater Oil Company, Ltd.
 Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility
                                     SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and
                                             Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
 Faculty Area
Equipment
Inspection Item
 Leasehold area
 between wells and
 Tank Battery
Flowlines
 Other


 Response staging
 areas
Road and Field Ditches

Chemicals, Fuels and Lube
Oils

Area
Flowline between the well and tank battery/gun barrel
Exposed line of buried piping
Valves (condition of, whether locked or sealed)
Evidence of leaks and/or damage, especially at
connections/collars
Corrosion (pitting, flaking)
Pipe supports

Evidence/puddles of crude oil and/or produced water

Storage conditions


Road practicable by field vehicle
Area clear of excessive vegetation
 * Tested quarterly by third party inspection company.
3.4.3  Periodic Condition Inspection of Bulk Storage Containers

A condition inspection of bulk storage containers is performed by a qualified inspector according
to the schedule and scope specified in API RP 12R1. The schedule is determined based on the
corrosion rate; with the first inspection  performed no more than 15 years after the tank
construction, as detailed in Table 3-5.

Three bulk storage containers installed at this facility were moved from another facility
decommissioned by Clearwater. These bulk storage containers were leak tested after relocation
to the facility.

         Table 3-5: Schedule of periodic condition inspection of bulk storage containers
Tank
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
Year Built
1983
2002
1995
2002
1991
Last Inspection J
11/5/1998
None
None
None
None
. Next inspection by ;^:. :;• • .;s.... .•::-. . o.:., ...<:' . ..v
11/5/2008*
First inspection to be performed by 12/31/2017*
First inspection to be performed by 12/31/2010*
First inspection to be performed by 12/31/2017*
First inspection to be performed by 12/31/2006*
* Dates for subsequent external inspections must follow the recommendations of the certified inspector, not to exceed
three-quarters of the predicted shell/roof deck corrosion rate life, or maximum of 15 years.

3.4.4   Brittle Fracture Evaluation [112.7{i)]

At the present time, none of the bulk storage containers at this site was field-erected, and
therefore no brittle fracture evaluation is required.
                                              -26-
                                                                                Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
  Clearwater Oil Company, Ltd.
  Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility
                                   SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and
                                           Counter-measure (SPCC) Plan
3.4.5   Flowline Maintenance Program [112.9(d)(3)]

Because the facility is relying on a contingency plan to address discharges, the flowline
maintenance program is specifically implemented to maintain the integrity of the primary
container (in this case piping) to minimize releases of oil from this part of the production facility.
The facility's gathering lines and flowlines are configured, inspected monthly for leaks at
connections and on each joint, corrosion (pitting, flaking), and maintained to minimize the
potential for a discharge as summarized in Table 3-6. Records of integrity inspections, leak
tests, and part replacements are kept at the facility for at least three years (integrity test results
are kept for ten years).

  	Table 3-6: Components of flowline maintenance program	
 Component
Measures/Activities
 Configuration
 Inspection
 Maintenance
       Well pumps are equipped with low-pressure shut-off systems that detect
       pressure drops and minimize spill volume in the event of a flowline leak.
       Flowlines are identified on facility maps and are marked in the field to facilitate
       access and inspection by facility personnel. Flowline maps and field tags
       indicate the location of shutdown devices and valves that may be used to
       isolate portions of the flowline.
       With the exception of a portion of Flowline  B under an access road, the
       flowlines and appurtenances (valves, flange joints, supports) can be visually
       observed for signs of leakage, deterioration, or other damage.

       Lines are visually inspected for leaks and corrosion as part of the monthly
       rounds by field personnel, as discussed in  Section 3.4 above.
       The buried portions of Flowline B are coated/wrapped and visually observed
       for damage or coating condition whenever  they are repaired, replaced, or
       otherwise exposed.
       Every five years, flowlines are tested using ultrasonic techniques to determine
       remaining wall thickness and mechanical integrity. Copies of test results are
       maintained atthe facility for ten years to allow comparison of successive tests.

       Any leak in the flowline or appurtenances is promptly addressed by isolating
       the damaged portion and repairing or replacing the faulty piece of equipment
       Clearwater does not accept pipe clamps and screw-in plugs as forms of repair.
       Any portion of a flowline that fails the mechanical integrity test is repaired and
       retested, or replaced.
3.5    Personnel, Training, and Discharge Prevention Procedures [112.7(f}]

The Field Operations Manager has been designated as the point of contact for all oil discharge
prevention and response at this facility.

All Clearwater field personnel receive training on proper handling of oil products and procedures
to respond to an oil discharge prior to entering any Clearwater production facility. The training
ensures that all facility personnel understand the procedures described in this SPCC Plan and
are informed of the requirements under applicable pollution control laws, rules and regulations.
The training also covers risks associated with potential exposure to hydrogen sulfide (H2S) gas.
                                             •27-
                                                                                VersiontO, 11/28/2005

-------
 C/earwafer Oil Company, Ltd.                             SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and
 Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility	Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan

All Clearwater field personnel also receive an initial 40-hour HAZWOPER training (and 8-hour
annual refresher training) as per OSHA standard.

Clearwater ensures that all contractor personnel are familiar with the facility operations, safety
procedures, and spill prevention and control procedures described in this Plan prior to working
at the facility. All contractors working at the facility receive a copy of this SPCC Plan. Avonlea
personnel visiting the facility receive training similar to that provided to Clearwater oil handling
employees.

Clearwater management holds briefings with field operations personnel  (including contractor
personnel as appropriate) at least once a year, as described below.

3.5.1   Spill Prevention Briefing

The Field Operations Manager conducts Spill Prevention Briefings annually to ensure adequate
understanding and effective implementation of this SPCC Plan. These briefings highlight and
describe known spill events or failures, malfunctioning components, and recently developed
precautionary measures. The briefings are conducted in conjunction with the company safety
meetings. Sign-in sheets, which include the topics of discussion at each meeting, are
maintained with this Plan at Clearwater's field office. A Discharge Prevention Briefing Log form
is provided in Appendix E to this Plan and is used to document the briefings. The scheduled
annual briefing includes a review of Clearwater policies and procedures relating to spill
prevention, control, cleanup, and reporting; procedures for routine handling of products (e.g.,
loading, unloading, transfers); SPCC inspections and spill prevention procedures; spill reporting
procedures; spill response; and recovery, disposal, and treatment of spilled material.

Personnel are instructed in operation and maintenance of equipment to  prevent the discharge of
oil,  and in applicable federal, state, and local pollution laws, rules, and regulations. Facility
operators and other personnel have an opportunity during the briefings to share
recommendations concerning health, safety, and environmental issues encountered during
facility operations.

The general outline of the briefings is as follows:

              Responsibilities of personnel and Designated Person Accountable for Spill
              Prevention;
       •       Spill prevention regulations and requirements;
              Spill prevention procedures;
              Spill reporting and cleanup procedures;
       •       History/cause of known spill events;
              Equipment failures and  operational issues;
       •       Recently developed measures/procedures;
              Proper equipment operation and maintenance; and
       •       Procedures for draining rainwater from berms.
                                          -28-
                                                                          Version 1.0. 11/28/2005

-------
  Clearwater Oil Company, Ltd.
  Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility
SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and
        Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
3.5.2  Contractor Instructions

In order that there will be no misunderstanding on joint and respective duties and
responsibilities to perform work in a safe manner, contractor personnel also receive instructions
on the procedures outlined in this SPCC Plan. The instructions cover the contractor activities
such as servicing a well or equipment associated with the well, such as pressure vessels.

All contractual agreements between Clearwater and contractors specifically state:

       Personnel must, at all times, act in a manner to preserve life and property, and prevent
       pollution of the environment by proper use of the facility's prevention and containment
       systems to prevent hydrocarbon and hazardous material spills. No pollutant, regardless of
       the volume, is to be disposed of onto the ground or water, or allowed to drain into the
       ground or water. Federal regulations impose substantial fines and/or imprisonment for
       willful pollution of navigable waters. Failure to report accidental pollution at this facility, or
       elsewhere, can be cause for equally severe penalties to be imposed by federal
       regulations. To this end, all personnel must comply with every requirement of this SPCC
       Plan, as well as taking necessary actions to preserve life, and property, and to prevent
       pollution of the environment. It is the contractor's (or subcontractor's) responsibility to
       maintain his equipment in good working order and in compliance with this SPCC Plan.
       The contractor (or subcontractor) is also responsible for the familiarity and compliance of
       his personnel with this SPCC Plan. Contractor and subcontractor personnel must secure
       permission from Clearwater's Field Operations Manager before commencing any work on
       any facility. They must immediately advise the Field Operations Manager of any
       hazardous or abnormal condition so that the Field Operations Manager can take
       corrective measures.
                                            -29-
                                                                              VersiontO, 11/28/2005

-------
C/earwater Oil Company, Ltd.
Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility
SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and
       Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
                 APPENDIX A: Facility Diagrams
     Figure A-1: Site plan.
                                    -30-
                  Version 10,11/28/2005

-------
Clearwater Oil Company, Ltd.
Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility
              SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and
                      Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
    BOX i. Saftwslw 0)^x»ti Wc-8 Ar«i>
        f"".'«V.™*"l ;  ^« (:-r:Tllijf
        fKWD"5 [-	 Aj/Rrar
        _~l.j :     ?.!!
    Clearwater OH Company
Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility
             Facility Diagram
              R&v. 11/1 #02
 Figure A-2: Production Facility Diagram.
                                          -31-
                                                                           Version 1.0.11/28/2005

-------
 Clearwater Oil Company, Ltd.                           SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and
 Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility                          Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan


         APPENDIX B: Tank Truck Loading Procedures

Loading Tank Truck

Make sure the vehicle tank is properly vented before starting to load or unload. If you are not
certain that the trailer is properly vented, you must contact your supervisor and request
permission to open the trailer dome before starting to load or unload.

To Load from Storage Tank to Tank Truck

             Attach ground cable or bonding clamp to trailer.
      •      Use wheel chocks or other similar barrier to prevent premature departure.
             Hook up load hose and open all appropriate valves from  storage tank to trailer
             entry.
             Disengage clutch and  place pump in  load position.
             Release clutch slowly.
             Adjust throttle to proper engine RPM.
             When trailer is loaded to appropriate  level, slow engine speed.
      •      Close valve to storage tank.
             Loosen loading hose to allow enough air to drain loading hose dry.
             Ensure that drips from the hose drain into the spill bucket at the loading area.
             Disconnect loading hose completely, close load valve, plug and fasten securely.
             Close belly valve on trailer.
             Disconnect ground cable.
             Promptly clean up any spilled oil.
             Inspect lowermost drains and valves of the vehicle for discharges/leaks and
             ensure that they are tightened, adjusted, or replaced as needed to prevent
             discharges while vehicle is in transit.
                                         -32-                           Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
 C/eanvafer Oil Company, Ltd.
 Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility
       SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and
              Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
            APPENDIX C: Monthly Inspection Checklist

Further description and comments, if needed, should be provided on a separate sheet of paper and attached to this
sheet. Any item answered "YES" needs to be promptly reported, repaired, or replaced, as it may result in non-
compliance with regulatory requirements. Records are maintained with the SPCC Plan at the Ridgeview field office.
Date:
Signature:.
Yes
Storage tanks and Separation Equipment
Tank surfaces show signs of leakage
Tanks show signs of damage, rust, or deterioration
Bolts, rivets or seams are damaged
Aboveground tank supports are deteriorated or buckled
Aboveground tank foundations have eroded or settled
Gaskets are leaking
Level gauges or alarms are inoperative
Vents are obstructed
Thief hatch and vent valve does not seal air tight
Containment berm shows discoloration or stains
Berm is breached or eroded or has vegetation
Berm drainage valves are open/broken
Tank area clear of trash and vegetation
Equipment protectors, labels or signs are missing
Piping/Flowlines and Related Equipment
Valve seals or gaskets are leaking.
Pipelines or supports are damaged or deteriorated.
Buried pipelines are exposed.
Transfer equipment
Loading/unloading lines are damaged or deteriorated.
Connections are not capped or blank-flanged
Secondary containment is damaged or stained
Response Kit Inventory
Discharge response material is missing or damaged or
needs replacement
No













Description & Comments
(Note tank/equipment ID)













Additional Remarks (attach sheet as needed):
                                          -33-
                                                                          VersionlQ, 11/28/2005

-------
 C/earwafer Oil Company, Ltd.
 Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility
SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and
        Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
                APPENDIX D:  Record of Dike  Drainage

This record must be completed when rainwater from diked areas is drained into a storm drain or into an open
watercourse, lake, or pond, and bypasses the water treatment system. The bypass valve must normally be sealed in
closed position and opened and reseated following drainage under responsible supervision. Records are maintained
with the SPCC Plan at the Ridge view field office.
	
Date
12/5/2003



Area
Tank battery



Presence of
Oil
No oil



Time Time Signature
Started Finished
08:00 8:40 William Mackenzie



                                            -34-
                                                                            Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
 Ctearwater Oil Company, Ltd.
 Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility
                                  SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and
                                         Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
       APPENDIX E:  Discharge Prevention Briefing Log
Date
12/5/2003

11/25/2004
Type of Briefing
           Instructors)
	L	1	1	
Scheduled refresher. All field personnel.  JHelena Berry, Optimal H&S Inc.
Scheduled refresher. Ail field personnel.	[BillLaurjer	
                                     -35-
                                                                 Version 1.0. 11/28/2005

-------
 Clearwater Oil Company, Ltd.
 Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility
SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and
       Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
        APPENDIX F:  Discharge Notification Procedures

Circumstances, instructions, and phone numbers for reporting a discharge to the National
Response Center and other federal, state, and local agencies, and to other affected parties, are
provided below. They are also posted at the facility in the storage shed containing the discharge
response equipment. Note that any discharge to water must be reported immediately to the
National Response Center.
      Field Operations Manager, Bill Laurier (24 hours)

      Local Emergency (fire, explosion, or other hazards)
      (405) 829-4051


      911
: Agency /Organization
Federal Agencies
National Response
Center
EPA Region VI
(Hotline)
EPA Region VI
Regional Administrator




State Agencies
Office of State Police,
Transportation and
Environmental Safety
Section, Hazardous
Materials Hotline




Office of State Police,
Transportation and
Environmental Safety
Section, Hazardous
Materials Hotline
Louisiana Department
of Environmental
Quality, Office of
Environmental
Compliance
Agency Contact ;

1-800-424-8802

1-800-887-6063

First Interstate Bank
Tower at Fountain
Place
1445 Ross Avenue,
12lh floor, Suite 1200
Dallas TX 75202

225-925-6595
or
1-877-925-6595






225-925-6595
or
1-877-925-6595


225-763-3908
or 225-342-1 234
(after business
hours, weekends
and holidays)
Circumstances .:•;.;• \ ':.:. • . . ;:•; :;;.:.:

Discharge reaching navigable
waters.


Discharge 1 ,000 gallons or
more; or second discharge of 42
gallons or more over a 1 2-month
period.



1 ) Injury requiring hospitalization
or fatality.
2) Fire, explosion, or other
impact that could affect public
safety.
3) Release exceeding 24-hour
reportable quantity.
4) Impact to areas beyond the
facility's confines.
Discharges that pose
emergency conditions,
regardless of the volume
discharged.

Discharges that do not pose
emergency conditions.



When to NotHy

Immediately (verbal)

Immediately (verbal)

Written notification within
60 days (see Section 2.1 of
this Plan)




Immediately (verbal)

Written notification to be
made within 5 days.





Within 1 hour of discovery
(verbal).

Written notification within 7
working days.
Within 24 hours of
discovery (verbal).

Written notification within 7
working days.
                                       -36-
                                                                    VersionlO, 11/28/2005

-------
  Clearwater Oil Company, Ltd.
  Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility
SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and
       Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
Agency /Organization
Local Agencies
St. Anthony's Parish
Emergency Planning
Committee
Others
Response/cleanup
contractors
Howard Fleming Farm
(agricultural irrigation
intake)
Agency Contact

337-828-1960

EZ Clean
(800)521-3211
Armadillo Oil
Removal Co.
(214)566-5586
(405) 235-6893
• Circumstances ' : . :

Any discharge of 1 00 Ibs or
more that occur beyond the
boundaries of the facility,
including to the air.

Any discharge that exceeds the
capacity of facility personnel to
respond and cleanup.
Any discharge that threatens to
affect neighboring properties
and irrigation intakes.
When to Notify >

Immediately (verbal)
Written notification within 7
days.

As needed
As needed
The person reporting the discharge must provide the following information:

              Name, location, organization, and telephone number;
              Name and address of the owner/operator;
       •       Date and time of the incident;
              Location of the incident;
              Source and cause of discharge;
       •       Types of material(s) discharged;
              Total quantity of materials discharged;
              Quantity discharged  in harmful quantity (to navigable waters or adjoining
              shorelines);
              Danger or threat posed by the release or discharge;
       •       Description  of all affected media (e.g., water, soil);
              Number and types of injuries (if any) and damaged caused;
              Weather conditions;
       •       Actions used to stop, remove, and mitigate effects of the discharge;
              Whether an evacuation is needed;
       *       Name of individuals and/or organizations contacted; and
              Any other information that may help emergency personnel respond to the
              incident.

Whenever the facility discharges more than 1,000 gallons of oil in a single event, or discharges
more than 42 gallons of oil in each of two discharge incidents within a 12-month period, the
Manager of Field Operations must provide the following information to the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency's Regional Administrator within 60 days:

              Name of the facility;
       •       Name of the owner or operator;
       •       Location of the facility;
                                          -37-
                                                                         Version 1.0.11/28/2005

-------
Clearwater Oil Company, Ltd.                             SAMPLE Spill Prevention. Control, and
Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility                          Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan

      •      Maximum storage or handling capacity and normal daily throughput;
      •      Corrective actions and countermeasures taken, including a description of
            equipment repairs and replacements;
            Description of facility, including maps,  flow diagrams, and topographical maps;
      •      Cause of the discharge(s) to navigable waters, including a failure analysis of the
            system and subsystems in which the failure occurred;
            Additional preventive measures taken  or contemplated to minimize possibility of
            recurrence; and
      •      Other pertinent information requested  by the Regional Administrator.
                                         -38-                            Version 1.0. 11/28/2005

-------
 Clearwater Oil Company, Ltd.
 Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility
SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and
        Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
                        Discharge Notification Form
*** Notification must not be delayed if information or individuals are not available.

Facility:         Clearwater Oil Company Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility
              5800 Route 417, Madison. Louisiana 73506
Description of Discharge • ..::..:. y : / : v;J/:.:: • ';•:•'•' ' • ' ::!••:•-.• •' .:'•;;•;•!• :.
Date/time
Reporting Individual
Location of discharge
Equipment source
Product
Appearance and
description
Environmental conditions
Release date:
Release time:
Duration:
Name:
Tel. #:
Latitude:
Longitude:
D piping
D flowline
Dwell
n unknown
D stock, flare
D crude oil
D saltwater
D other*
Wind direction:
Wind speed:
Discovery date:
Discovery time:
Description:
Description:
Equipment ID:
* Describe other:
Rainfall:
Current
• Impacts^ :' . • •::•!•:'!! !'••'•' ' '.:;:;.'. ';; : : ' : : ' : ;-:: i^ : ;':i'-: : •; :':-:::;:. : '. . i-:;:-;: y : :
Quantify
Receiving medium
Released:
D water"
D land
D other (describe):
Recovered:
D Release confined to company property.
Q Release outside company property.
** If water, indicate extent and body of water.
Describe circumstances
of the release
Assessment of impacts
and remedial actions
Disposal method for
recovered material
Action taken to prevent
incident from reoccurring
Safety issues
D Injuries
O Fatalities
D Evacuation
i
                                           -39-
                                                                           VersionlO, 11/28/2005

-------
C/earwafer 0/7 Company, Ltd.
Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility
                                   SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and
                                           Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
Notifications
Agency
Name
Date/time reported & Comments
Company Spill
Response Coordinator

National Response
Center
1-800-424-8802
State police

Parish Emergency
Response Commission
oil spill removal
organization/cleanup
contractor
                                             -40-
                                                                                Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
Clearwater Oil Company, Ltt
Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility
                                    SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and
                                            Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
          APPENDIX  G: Equipment Shut-off Procedures
Source
Action
Manifold, transfer
pumps or hose failure

Tank overflow
Tank failure

Flowline rupture


Flowline leak


Explosion or fire




Equipment failure
Shut in the well supplying oil to the tank battery if appropriate. Immediately close the
header/manifold or appropriate valve(s). Shut off transfer pumps.

Shut in the well supplying oil to the tank battery. Close header/manifold or appropriate
valve(s)

Shut in the well supplying oil to the tank battery. Close inlet valve to the storage tanks.

Shut in the well supplying oil to the flowline. Close nearest valve to the rupture site to
top the flow of oil.

Shut in the well supplying oil to the flowline. Immediately close the nearest valve to stop
the flow of oil to the leaking section.

Immediately evacuate personnel from the area until the danger is over. Immediately
shut in both wells if safe to do so. If possible, close all manifold valves. If the fire is
small enough such that it is safe to do so, attempt to extinguish with fire extinguishers
available on site.

Immediately close the nearest valve to stop the flow of oil into the leaking area.
                                             -41-
                                                                                Version 1.0. 11/28C005

-------
 Clearwater Oil Company, Ltd.
 Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility
             SAMPLE Spill Prevention. Control, and
                    Counter-measure (SPCC) Plan
       APPENDIX H: Written Commitment of Manpower,

                        Equipment, and Materials

In addition to implementing the preventive measures described in this Plan, Clearwater will also
specifically:

       In the event of a discharge:

       •      Make available all trained field personnel (three employees) to perform response
             actions

             Obtain assistance from an additional three full-time employees from its main
             operations contractor {Avonlea Services)

       •      Collaborate fully with local, state, and federal authorities on response and
             cleanup operations

       Maintain all on-site oil spill control equipment described in this Plan and in the attached
       Oil Spill Contingency Plan. The equipment is estimated to contain oil spills of up to 500
       gallons.

       Maintain all communications equipment in operating condition at all times.

•      Ensure that staging areas to be used in the event of a discharge to Big Bear Creek are
       accessible by field vehicles.

       Review the adequacy of on-site and third-party response capacity with pre-established
       response/cleanup contractors on an annual basis and update response/cleanup
       contractor list as necessary.

       Maintain formal agreements/contracts with response and cleanup contractors who will
       provide assistance in responding to an oil discharge and/or completing cleanup (see
       contract agreements maintained separately at the Ridgeview field office and lists of
       associated equipment and response contractor personnel capabilities).
Authorized Facility Representative:
Signature:
Title:
Bill Laurier
(nill iojj/wt/k
Field Operations Manager
                                        -42-
                                                                      VersionlO, 11/28/2005

-------
 Ctearwater Oil Company, Ltd.                          SAMPLE Spill Prevention, Control, and
 Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility	Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan


              APPENDIX I:  Oil Spill Contingency Plan

The oil spill contingency plan is maintained separately at the Ridgeview field office.

[Refer to the sample Contingency Plan also available from EPA for more information on the
content and format of that Plan]
                                      -43-                         Version 10,11/28/2005

-------
                        DISCLAIMER -APPENDIX F

      The sample Contingency Plan in Appendix F is intended to provide examples of
contingency planning as a reference when a facility determines that the required secondary
containment is impracticable, pursuant to 40 CFR §112.7{d).  The sample Contingency Plan
presents a variety of scenarios for purposes of illustration only.  It is not a template to be
adopted by a facility; doing so does not mean that the facility will be in compliance with the
SPCC rule requirements for a contingency plan. Nor is the sample plan a template that must be
followed in order for the facility to be considered in compliance with the contingency plan
requirement.
                                                                     Version 10, 11/28/2005

-------
                Clearwater Oil Company, Ltd.
                Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility
                            Oil Spill Contingency Plan
                               CLEARWATER OIL COMPANY
                   BIG BEAR LEASE  No. 2 PRODUCTION FACILITY
                             OIL SPILL CONTINGENCY PLAN
NOTE: Throughout this document, shaded
boxes identify relevant sections of 40 CFR
part 109 and part 112.
         1.1   Purpose and Scope
    PARTI
Introduction
               This Oil Spill Contingency Plan is prepared in accordance with 40 CFR 112.7{d) to
               address areas of the facility where secondary containment is impracticable, as
               documented in the facility Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan.

               The purpose of this Oil Spill Contingency Plan ("Contingency Plan") is to define
               procedures and tactics for responding to discharges of oil into navigable waters or
               adjoining shorelines of the United States, originating more specifically from flowlines at
               Clearwater Oil Company ("Clearwater") Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility. The
               Contingency Plan is implemented whenever a discharge of oil has reached, or threatens,
               navigable waters or adjoining shorelines.

               The objective of procedures described in this Contingency Plan is to protect the public,
               Clearwater personnel, and other responders during oil discharges.  In addition, the Plan
               is intended to minimize damage to the environment, natural resources, and facility
               installations from a discharge of oil. This Oil Spill Contingency Plan complements the
               prevention and control measures presented in the facility's SPCC Plan by addressing
               areas of the facility that have inadequate secondary containment and impacts that may
               result from a discharge from these areas. The facility implements a detailed and
               stringent flowline maintenance program to prevent leaks from the primary system (in this
               case,  piping). Areas lacking adequate containment at the Big Bear Lease No. 2
               Production Facility include the flowlines that run between the extraction wells and the
               tank battery area and between the tank battery area and the saltwater disposal area.

               This Oil Spill Contingency Plan follows the content and organization of 40 CFR part 109
               and describes the distribution of responsibilities and basic procedures for responding to
               an oil  discharge  and performing cleanup operations.
                                                -1-
                                                                             Version 1.0.11/28/2005

-------
                  Clearwater Oil Company, Ltd.
                  Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility
                                                          Oil Spill Contingency Plan
           1.2    Resources at Risk
40 CFR 1Q9.5(b){1)
Clearwater's Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility is located approximately 6 miles
North of Madison, LA, within the Mines River watershed (see Figure C-1 in Appendix C).
The waterways closest to the facility are Big Bear Creek, which flows approximately Yz
mile to the east of the facility, and the Mines River, which flows 6 miles to the south in a
west-to-east direction and receives water from Big Bear Creek. The facility diagram
included in Appendix C (Figure C-2) indicates the location of the oil extraction,
production, and storage areas. Ground cover at the facility consists of compacted soil,
gravel, and low lying vegetation. The natural topography of the land is graded in an east-
southeast direction, and all surface drainage from the facility therefore flows towards Big
Bear Creek. The slope is  relatively mild: approximately 4 feet vertical per mile (5,280
feet) horizontal.

Three flowlines (which contain oil) at the facility lack adequate secondary containment
(see Figure C-2):

       Rowline A. The flowline from Well A to the tank battery (FLA) is approximately
       2,100 feet long. It  runs aboveground in a north-south direction to the tank battery
       area.

       Flowline B. The flowline between Well B and the tank battery (FLB) is
       approximately 3,400 feet long. It travels in a southwest direction to the tank
       battery area. This  flowline runs the closest to navigable waters. At the closest
       point, the flowline  is located Vz mile from Big Bear Creek.

•      Flowline SWD. The flowline between the tank battery and the saltwater disposal
       well is approximately 2,000 feet long. It runs in an east-west direction.

All three flowlines are aboveground, with the exception of a  short portion of Flowline B
that is buried under the dirt/gravel access road. A drainage ditch runs along the access
road to the east of the tank battery and along Route 417. The ditch flows into Big Bear
Creek. Given the direction of surface drainage, a discharge  from any of the three
flowlines could reach Big  Bear Creek, either directly or via the drainage ditch, and from
there, flow southward to the Mines River.

Neither Big Bear Creek nor the Mines River is  used as a public drinking water supply,
although animals grazing  on the nearby land are often seen drinking from Big Bear
Creek and the Howard Fleming Farm has an agricultural irrigation  intake on Big Bear
Creek (see the Notification Form later in this Plan for contact information). The two
waterways, however, provide habitat for a number of aquatic species and mammals and
are used by local residents for recreational  purposes. The Mines River runs through the
center of Madison. Recreational and scenic areas are located on both banks of the river.
                                                     -2-
                                                                                    Version 1.0. 11/28/2005

-------
        Clearwater Oil Company, Ltd.
        Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility                        Oil Spill Contingency Plan
       A public park is located approximately 1 mile east from the town center and 8 miles from
       the facility. Recreational uses on the Mines River include picnic areas, walking trails,
       canoeing, and  nature watching.

       There are no residences within the immediate vicinity of the facility. The closest
       residence is located 1 mile to the north of the site, upstream on Big Bear Creek. The
       closest residence downstream from the site is located 3 miles away. Both residences
       have private drinking water wells. Clearwater will coordinate with the Madison fire and/or
       police departments and with its residential neighbors to provide the appropriate warnings
       in the event of  a discharge that could affect public health and safety.

1.3   Risk Assessment

       The facility is comprised of approximately 7,500 feet of 2-inch diameter flowlines. With
       the exception of a short road crossing, the flowlines are located aboveground. The
       flowlines do not have secondary containment, since such containment is impracticable at
       this facility (see discussion on impracticability of secondary containment in the facility's
       SPCC Plan),

       The total daily production rate at the facility varies, but can reach as much as 1,260
       gallons of crude oil and 5,880 gallons of produced water. The two wells have
       approximately equal production rates (each 3,570 gallons per day). Flowline B, the
       longest of the three flowlines and the one closest to navigable waters, contains up to
       555 gallons of oil/water when charged. The facility is visited daily. For planning
       purposes, the worst-case discharge is therefore the volume of oil within the flowline plus
       24 hours of production, or 4,125 gallons.

       A discharge of this quantity of oil could potentially reach Big  Bear Creek. The velocity of
       oil over land is  estimated,  based on past experience and a simple calculation of flow
       over short grass pastureland, at approximately 0.2 feet/second.1 Considering the
       distance between Flowline B and Big Bear Creek (Yz mile) and the 2-foot elevation
       gradient, the oil, if unimpeded, could reach Big Bear Creek in as little as 4 hours. The
       water current in Big Bear Creek averages approximately 0.3 feet/second during high
       stages. Over a 24-hour period, the oil could travel approximately 5 miles downstream
       from the release point. The Mines River, which is located only 6 miles downstream to the
       south of the tank battery area, could therefore possibly be affected by a discharge.
       1 Calculated using sheet flow transport equations.


                                          -3-                             Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
       Clearwater Oil Company, Ltd.
       Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility
Oil Spill Contingency Plan
1.4    Response Strategy

       Clearwater personnel and contractors are equipped and trained to respond to certain
       "minor discharges" confined within the facility. Minor discharges can generally be
       described as those where the quantity of product discharged is small, the discharged
       material can be easily stopped and controlled, the discharge is localized, and the
       product is not likely to seep into groundwater or reach surface water or adjoining
       shorelines. Procedures for responding to these minor discharges are covered in the
       SPCC Plan.

       This Contingency Plan addresses all discharge incidents, including those that affect
       navigable waters or during which the oil cannot be safely controlled by facility personnel
       and confined within the boundaries of the facility. Response to such incidents may
       necessitate the assistance of outside contractors or other responders to prevent
       imminent impact to navigable waters.
                                          -4-
                                                                         Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
                  Clearwater Oil Company. Ltd.
                  Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility
                                                               Oil Spill Contingency Plan
 40CFR109.5(a)
 40CFR109.5(d){2}
40CFR1Q9.5(b}(2)
                                      PART II

                     Spill Discovery and Response

2.1    Distribution of Responsibilities

       Clearwater has the primary responsibility for providing the initial response to oil
       discharge incidents  originating from its facility.  To accomplish this, Clearwater has
       designated the Field Operations Manager,  Bill Laurier, as the qualified oil discharge
       Response Coordinator (RC) in the event of an oil discharge.

       The RC plays a central coordinating role in any emergency situation, as illustrated in the
       emergency organization chart in Figure 2-1.

       The RC has the authority to commit the necessary services and equipment to respond to
       the discharge and to request assistance from Madison fire and/or police departments,
       contractors, or other responders, as appropriate.

       The RC will direct notifications and initial response actions in accordance with training
       and capabilities.  In the event of a fire or emergency situation that threatens the health
       and safety of those present at the site, the  RC will direct evacuations and contact the fire
       and police departments.

       In the event of an emergency involving outside response agencies, the RC's primary
       responsibility is to provide information regarding the characteristics of the materials and
       equipment involved  and to provide access to Clearwater resources as requested. The
       RC shall also take necessary measures to  control the flow of people, emergency
       equipment, and supplies and obtain the support of the Madison Police Department as
       needed to maintain control of the site. These controls may be necessary to minimize
       injuries and confusion.

       Finally, the RC serves as the coordinator for radio communications by acquiring all
       essential information and ensuring clear communication of information to  emergency
       response personnel. The RC has access to reference material at the field office either as
       printed material or on computer files that can further assist the response activities.

       Whenever circumstances permit, the RC transmits assessments and recommendations
       to Clearwater Senior Management for direction. Senior Management is contacted in the
       following order: (1) Regional  Director of Operations; (2) Vice-President of Operations.

       In the event that the Field Operations Manager is not available, the responsibility and
       authority for initiating a response to a discharge rests with the most senior Clearwater
       employee on site at the time the discharge is discovered (Crew Lead) or with the
                                                    •5-
                                                                                  VersiontO. 11/28/2005

-------
 Clearwater OH Company, Ltd.
 Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility
Oil Spill Contingency Plan
contractor Field Supervisor (or next person in command) if contractor personnel are the
only personnel on site,
    VPof Op
                                                                 $11

Oi! !
!f?»«m j
%£ 1
jffS i
283 i

wt i
•C0_ i
1
c*>*

:;^r
lrn»rg«ncy
Fi*ltt
Coorofnatot
ons Wsna^er

f*85; «-



U,-:ai, S«»te at
P-srsonne!


«^C«*««

Cfesrwale: OB £ZC(asfi Af^J
 Figure 2-1. Distribution of response authority and communication.
                                     -6-
                                                                     Version 1.0, 11/28(2005

-------
                 Clearwater OH Company, Ltd.
                 Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility
                                                          Oil Spill Contingency Plan
          2.2   Response Activities
4QCFR109.5{d)
40CFR109,5(e)
In the event of a discharge, the first priority is to stop the product flow and to shut off alt
ignition sources, followed by the containment, control, and mitigation of the discharge.
This Contingency Plan breaks actions to be performed to respond to an oil discharge
into different phases, described in greater detail in the checklists below.
          2.2.1  Discharge Discovery and Source Control

                Minor Discharge. A minor discharge (i.e., small volume leak from flowlines or other
                equipment) will be discovered by Clearwater facility personnel or by contractor personnel
                during scheduled daily or monthly visits to the facility. Aboveground flowlines are visually
                inspected formally once a month during the normal inspection rounds.

                Major Discharge. A more severe and sudden discharge will trigger the automatic shut
                down of the pumping units and will affect oil production. The impact will be detected
                during the daily visit to the production area by Clearwater or contractor field personnel.
                The maximum amount of time until a major discharge is detected can be up to 24 hours.

                Notifications to the National Response  Center, Louisiana authorities, and St. Anthony's
                Parish Emergency Committee must occur immediately upon discovery of reportable
                discharges.
Completed





Actions • :- .;.;; ;; .;':;.;.:; :•;• :.;:::.: .:;.: j' /: •( J.: .:-:::. .I:..;;;. ./...•;.. :::
Immediately report the discharge to the RC, providing the following
• Exact location;
Material involved;
• Quantity involved;
Topographic and environmental conditions;
• Circumstances that may hinder response; and
Injuries, if any.
information:
Turn off all sources of ignition.
Turn off lift pumps that charge or provide flow to the flowline.
Locate the flowline break.
If safe to do so, isolate the affected section of piping by closing off the closest
valves upstream and downstream from the break.
                                                    .7.
                                                                                  Version 10, 11/28/2005

-------
        Clearwater Oil Company, Ltd.
        Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility
Oil Spill Contingency Plan
2.2.2   Assessment and Notifications
Completed







Actions
Investigate the discharge to assess the actual or potential threat to human health
or the environment:
Location of the discharge relative to receiving waterbodies;
Quantity of spilled material;
• Ambient conditions (temperature, rain);
• Other contributing factors such as fire or explosion hazards; and
Sensitive receptors downstream.
Request outside assistance from local emergency responders, as needed.
Evaluate the need to evacuate facility and evacuate employees, as needed.
Notify the fire/police departments and St. Anthony's Parish Emergency Committee
to assess whether community evacuation is needed.
Notify immediately:
911
• National Response Center
Response contractor(s)
St. Anthony's Parish Emergency Planning Committee
State authorities
Communicate with neighboring property owners regarding the discharge and
actions taken to mitigate the damage.
If the oil reaches (or threatens to reach) the Mines River, notify the local fire/police
departments to limit access to the River by local residents until the oil has been
contained and recovered.
Additionally, notify downstream water users of the spill and of actions that will be
taken to protect these downstream receptors.
2.2.3  Control and Recovery

       The RC directs the initial control of the oil flow by Clearwater, Avonlea Oil Services, and
       other contractor personnel. The actions taken will depend on whether the oil has
       reached water or is still on land. All effort will be made to prevent oil from reaching water.
                                           -8-
                                                                           Version 1 0, 11/28/2005

-------
        Clearwater Oil Company, Ltd.
        Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility
                                                    Oil Spill Contingency Plan
If the oil has not yet reached water:
Completed



Actions
Deploy sand bags and absorbent socks downgradient from the oil, or erect
temporary barriers such as trenches or mounds to prevent the oil from flowing
towards Big Bear Creek.
Implement land based response actions (countermeasure) such as digging
temporary containment pits, ponds, or curbs to prevent the flow of oil into the
river.
Deploy absorbent sock and sorbent materiai along the shoreline to prevent oil
from entering waters.
if the oil has reached water:
Completed





Actions
Contact cleanup contractor(s).
Deploy floating booms immediately downstream from the release point. Big Bear
Creek is narrow and shallow. Floating boom deployment does not require the use
of a boat.
Control oil flow on the ground by placing absorbent socks and other sorbent
material or physical barriers (e.g., "kitty litter," sandbags, earthen berm, trenches)
across the oil flow path.
Deploy additional floating booms across the whole width of the Creek at the next
access point downstream from the release point. Access points and staging areas
along the shoreline are identified on Figure C-1 of this Contingency Plan.
Deploy protective booming measures for downstream receptors that may be
impacted by the spill.
2.2.4  Disposal of Recovered Product and Contaminated Response Material

       The RC ensures that all contaminated materials classified as hazardous waste are
       disposed of in accordance with all applicable solid and hazardous waste regulations.
Completed
Actions
            Place any recovered product that can be recycled into the gun barrel tank to be
            separated and recycled.
            Dispose of recovered product not suitable for on-site recycling with the rest of the
            waste collected during the response efforts.
                                          -9-
                                                                         Versionl.O, 11/28/2005

-------
       C/earwafer 0/7 Company, Ltd.
       Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility
                                                    Oil Spill Contingency Plan
            Collect alt debris in properly labeled waste containers (impervious bags, drums, or
            buckets).
            Dispose of contaminated material in accordance with all applicable solid and
            hazardous waste regulations using a licensed waste hauler and disposal facility,
            after appropriately characterizing the material for collection and disposal.
            Dispose of all contaminated response material within 2 weeks of the discharge.
2.2.5   Termination
       The RC ensures that cleanup has been completed and that the contaminated area has
       been treated or mitigated according to the applicable regulations and state/federal
       cleanup action levels. The RC collaborates with the local, state and federal authorities
       regarding the assessment of damages.
Completed
Actions
            Ensure that all repairs to the defective equipment orflowline section have been
            completed.
            Review circumstances that led to the discharge and take all necessary
            precautions to prevent a recurrence.
            Evaluate the effectiveness of the response activities and make adjustments as
            necessary to response procedures and personnel training.
            Carry out personnel and contractor debriefmgs as necessary to emphasize
            prevention measures or to communicate changes in operations or response
            procedures.
            Submit any required follow-up reports to the authorities.

            In the case where the discharge (as defined in 40 CFR 112.1 (b)) was greater than
            1,000 gallons or was the second discharge (as defined in 40 CFR 112.1(b)) of 42
            gallons or more within any 12-month period, the RC is responsible for submitting
            the required information within 60 days to the  EPA Regional Admnmtrator
            following the procedures outlined in Appendix B.
            Within 30 days of the discharge, the RC will convene an incident critique including
            all appropriate persons that responded to the spill. The goal of the incident
            critique is to discuss lessons learned, the efficacy of the Contingency Plan and its
            implementation, and coordination of the plan/RC and other state and local plans.

            Within 60 days of the critique, the Contingency Plan will be updated (as needed)
            to incorporate the results, findings, and suggestions developed during the critique.
                                         -10-
                                                                         Version 1.0. 11/28/2005

-------
                  Clearwater Oil Company, Ltd.
                  Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility                        Oil Spill Contingency Plan
           2.3   Discharge Notification

                 Instructions and phone numbers for reporting a discharge to the National Response
                 Center and other federal, state, and local authorities are provided in Appendix B to this
                 Plan. Any discharge to water must be reported immediately to the National Response
4Q CFR1Q9 SM2)  I  Center. The Response Coordinator must ensure that details of the discharge are
              *  recorded on the Discharge Notification Form provided in Appendix B.

                 If the discharge qualifies under 40 CFR part 112 (see Appendix B for conditions), the RC
                 is responsible for ensuring that all pertinent information is provided to the EPA Regional
                 Administrator.
                                                    -11 -                            Version 1 0,11/28/2005

-------
                 Clearwater Oil Company, Ltd.
                 Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility
                                                              Oil Spill Contingency Plan
40CFR109.5(c)(1)
and(c)(2)
40 CFR 109.5(d)(3)
40 CFR 1Q9.5(d)(2)
                                    PART III

       Response Resources and Preparedness Activities

3.1    Equipment, Supplies, Services, and Manpower

       Spill kits are provided in a storage shed at the production site that is accessible by both
       Clearwater and Avonlea personnel (see Figure C-2 in Appendix C). Response
       equipment and material present at the site include:

       (4)          Empty 55-gallons drums to hold contaminated material
       (1)          50-fl absorbent socks
       (2)          10-ft sections of hard skirted deployment boom
       (2)          50-ft floating booms
       (200 pounds) "Oil-dry" Loose absorbent material
       (4 boxes)     2 ft x 3 ft absorbent pads
       (3 boxes)     Nitrite gloves
       (3 boxes)     Neoprene gloves
       (6 pairs)     Vinyl/PVC pull-on overboots
       (3)          Non-sparking shovels                                  •
       (3)          Brooms
       (20)         Sand bags
       (1)          Combustible Gas Indicator with H2S detection capabilities

       This material is sufficient to respond to most minor discharges occurring at the facility
       and to initially contain a major discharge while waiting for additional material or support
       from outside contractors. The inventory is verified on a monthly basis during the
       scheduled facility inspection by designated personnel and is replenished as needed.

       Additional material and equipment is kept at Clearwater's field office, located 25 miles
       from the facility. This additional material includes empty storage drums, absorbent socks
       and booms, containment booms, sand bags, personal protective gear, etc. It also
       includes all necessary communication equipment to coordinate response activities (cell
       phones, two-way radios). The Field Office serves as the response operation center
       during a response.

       Clearwater has three employees trained and available to respond to an oil discharge.
       Clearwater personnel may be assisted by three additional employees from the facility's
       main contractor, Avonlea Oil Services. All employees are familiar with the facility layout,
       location of spill response equipment and staging areas, and response strategies, and
       with the SPCC and Oil Spill Contingency Plans for this facility. All have received training
       in the deployment of response material and handling of hazardous waste (HAZWOPER)
       and have attended the required refresher courses.
                                                  -12-
                                                                                 Versionl.O, 11^28/2005

-------
                  Clearwater Oil Company, Ltd.
                  Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility
                                                               Oil Spill Contingency Plan
 40 CFR 1Q9.5(c)(3)
       To respond to larger discharges and ensure the removal and disposal of cleanup debris,
       Clearwater has established agreements with two specialized cleanup contractors:
       EZCIean and Armadillo Oil Removal, with EZCIean contacted first and acting as the
       primary response/cleanup contractor and Armadillo Oil Removal acting as the alternate
       or in a supporting role. Contact information is provided in Appendix A. These contractors
       have immediate access to an assortment of equipment and materials, including
       mechanical recovery equipment for use on water and on land, small boats, floating
       booms, and large waste containers. Each contractor has sufficient response equipment
       to contain and recover the maximum possible discharge of 4,125 gallons. EZCIean and
       Armadillo Oil  Removal are able to respond within 4 hours of receiving a verbal request
       from the RC.  Clearwater discusses response capacity needs on an annual basis with
       each contractor to ensure that sufficient equipment and material are available to respond
       to a potential  4,125-gallon discharge. The inventories of EZCIean and Armadillo Oil
       Removal equipment are maintained with the response agreements and updated
       annually.

3.2    Access to Receiving Waterbody
40 CFR 109.5(d)(5)
       Big gear Creek would be the first waterbody affected
       in the event of a discharge. From there, the oil would
       flow into the Mines River. The response strategy
       consists of: (1) deploying booms and other response
       equipment at various points downstream from the oil
       plume to prevent its migration; and (2) deploying
       booms as a protective measure for an irrigation water
       intake and other downstream sensitive receptors.

       Vehicular access to Big Bear Creek is essential to
       ensure that the response equipment can be effectively
       deployed to contain oil at various points along the
       waterway and prevent further migration of the oil
       towards the Mines River.

       Three access points have been established along Big
       Bear Creek and are marked on the map in Figure C-1
       (BB1, BB2, and BBS). These access points provide
       sufficient cleared land for a staging area from which
       Clearwater or contractor personnel can deploy
       response equipment, and recover and store spilled oil.
       Twice a year, as part of the monthly inspection of the
       facility,  Clearwater facility personnel drive to each
       access  point and make sure that it remains
       accessible (e.g., vegetation  is not overgrown and the
                                                   -13-
                                                                  Figure 3-2: Boom deployed
                                                                  across Big Bear Creek.
                                                                  Figure 3-3: Boom deployed at
                                                                  Route 54 bridge crossing.
                                                                                  Version 1.0. 11/28/2005

-------
                 Clearwater Oil Company, Ltd.
                 Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility
                                                         Oil Spill Contingency Plan
         dirt trail is not impassable for a field vehicle). The respective property owners have agreed to
         allow access to Clean/water's personnel and contractors for response and maintenance
         purposes. Although no further approval is needed prior to the deployment of response
         equipment, the RC will contact the property owners as necessary to inform them of activities
         being carried out.

                If necessary, three access points are also available along the Mines River. One is
                located in the center of Madison, at the bridge crossing for Route 101, the second is
                located at the public park two miles downstream from the center, and the third one is
                located at the bridge crossing for Route 54, four miles downstream from the center.
                Coordination with the Madison police/fire departments is  necessary to stage equipment
                at these three access points.

         3.3   Communications and Control
4QCFR109.5(b){3)
40CFR109.5((i)(3)
A central coordination center will be set up at the field office in the event of a discharge.
The field office is equipped with a variety of fixed and mobile communication equipment
(telephone, fax, cell phones, two-way radios, computers) to ensure continuous
communication with Clearwater management, responders, authorities, and other
interested parties.

Communications equipment includes:

       Portable hand-held  radios. Clearwater maintains a two-way base station and
       four portable radio units. These radio units are kept at the field office as part of
       the response equipment. Local emergency responders have been provided with
       the response frequencies that will be used during an incident.
       Cell phones. Each field vehicle and the RC are provided with a cell phone. The
       RC and/or his alternate (Site Supervisor when the Field Operations Manager is
       not "on calf) can be reached by cell phone 7 days a week, 24 hours a day.
       Additional equipment. Additional equipment will be obtained from EZCIean
       and/or Armadillo Oil Removal in the event that more communications equipment
       is necessary.

The RC is responsible for communicating the status of the response operations and for
sharing relevant information  with involved parties, including local, state, and federal
authorities.

In the event that local response agencies, Louisiana authorities, or a federal On Site
Coordinator (OSC) assumes Incident Command, the RC will function as the facility
representative in the Unified Command structure.
                                                  -14-
                                                                                 Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
                 Ctearwater Oil Company, Ltd.
                 Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility                       Oil Spill Contingency Plan
          3.4   Training Exercises and Updating Procedures

                Clearwater has established and maintains an ongoing training program to ensure that
40 CFR iQ9.5(d){l) j Clearwater personnel responding to oil discharges are properly trained and that all
                necessary equipment is available to them. The program includes on-the-job training on
                the proper deployment of response equipment and periodic practice drills during which
                Clearwater personnel are asked to deploy equipment and material in response to a
                simulated discharge. The RC is responsible for implementing and evaluating employee
                preparedness training.

                Following a response to an oil discharge, the RC will evaluate the actions taken and
                identify procedural areas where improvements are needed. The RC will conduct a
                briefing with field personnel, contractors, and local emergency responders to discuss
                lessons learned and will integrate the outcome of the discussion in subsequent SPCC
                briefings and employee training seminars. As necessary, the RC will amend this
                Contingency Plan or the SPCC  Plan to reflect changes made to the facility equipment
                and procedures. A Professional Engineer will certify any technical amendment to the
                SPCC Plan.
                                                   -15-                           Version 1 0. 11/28/2005

-------
               Ctearwater Oil Company, Ltd,
               Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility
                               Oil Spill Contingency Plan
40 CFR 109.5(b)(2)
     APPENDIX A
EMERGENCY CONTACTS
         Facility Operations
Name
Bill Laurier
Carol Campbell
Lester Pearson
Joe Clark
William Mackenzie
•':-:TWe: : : !':"!i:
Field Operations
Manager
Clearwater Oil Co.
Regional Director of
Operations
Clearwater Oil Co.
Vice-President of
Operations
Clearwater Oil Co.
Field Supervisor
Avonlea Services, Inc.
Pumper
Avonlea Services, Inc.
Telephone : : ^\^\ •;;:•:. ;
(405) 831 -6322 (office)
(405) 829-4051 (cell)
(405) 831 -6320 (office)
(405) 831 -2262 (cell)
(555)-289-4500
(406) 545-2285 (office)
(406) 549-9087 (cell)
(406) 549-9087 (cell)
• : Address •::- • . : • • •
2451 Mountain Drive
Ridgeview, LA 701 80
2451 Mountain Drive
Ridgeview, LA 701 80
13000 Main Street, Suite
400
Houston, TX 77077
786 Cherry Creek Road
Avonlea, LA 70180
786 Cherry Creek Road
Avonlea, LA 701 80
         Local Emergency Responders
-/Name. • • • . .. ;j--.: .
Fire/Police Departments
Emerson Hospital
Telephone
911
(405) 830-2000
(405)831-9558
'.. Address • • :.-.;•;;.•:.;;.: : • • • :'• :.;.:•;/ •.•••. :
2451 Mountain Drive, Madison, LA 70180
13000 Main Street, Madison, LA 70180
         Cleanup Contractors
Name •. '.' :'::^\'-
EZCIean
Armadillo Oil Removal
Telephone^ ; ;;
(800) 521 -321 1
(214)566-5588
:: 'Address : ;:;;:-:: •;•:;: ..•;•: •; ;- : ;'-- :::Q':.. :•;•':;• : :- -: '.
1200 Industry Park Drive, Gardner, LA 70180
25 B Street, Suite #6, Madison. LA 70180
         Neighboring Property Owners
•flfiame : :'/••;
Maurice Richard
Jim Larouche
Peter Martin
Howard Fleming
; vH^yFetephone : :":••
(405)830-2186
(405) 832-2645
(405) 832-5527
(405) 235-6893
Address . .:: •. . • :': :: ::•.:-:-:':-::•-::.;:.:
5540 Route 417, Madison, LA 70180
6075 Greenfield Drive, Madison, LA 70180
1644 Oilfield Road, Madison, LA 70180
531 Horseshoe Road, Madison, LA 70180
Sv-'ilocirtion • • :
BB1
BB2
BB3

                                           -16-
                                                                     VersionlO. 11/28/2005

-------
       C/eanvafer O/7 Company, Ltd.
       Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility
    Oil Spill Contingency Plan
                                APPENDIX B

              DISCHARGE NOTIFICATION PROCEDURES

Circumstances, instructions, and phone numbers for reporting a discharge to the National
Response Center and other federal, state, and local agencies, and to other affected parties, are
provided below. They are also posted at the facility in the storage shed containing the discharge
response equipment. Note that any discharge to water must be reported immediately to the
National Response Center.
      Field Operations Manager, Bill Laurier (24 hours)

      Local Emergency (fire, explosion, or other hazards)
(405) 829-4051


911
Agency / Organization
Federal Agencies
National Response
Center
EPA Region VI
(Hotline)
EPA Region VI
Regional Administrator




State Agencies
Office of State Police,
Transportation and
Environmental Safety
Section, Hazardous
Materials Hotline




Office of State Police,
Transportation and
Environmental Safety
Section, Hazardous
Materials Hotline
Agency Contact •

1 -800-424-8802

1-800-887-6063

First Interstate Bank
Tower at Fountain
Place
1 445 Ross Avenue,
12lh floor, Suite 1200
Da lias TX 75202

225-925-6595
or
1-877-925-6595






225-925-6595
or
1-877-925-6595


Circumstances

Discharge reaching navigable
waters.


Discharge 1 ,000 gallons or
more; or second discharge of 42
gallons or more over a 1 2-month
period.



1) Injury requiring hospitalization
or fatality.
2) Fire, explosion, or other
impact that could affect public
safety.
3) Release exceeding 24-hour
reportable quantity.
4) Impact to areas beyond the
facility's confines.
Discharges that pose
emergency conditions,
regardless of the volume
discharged.

When to Notify

Immediately (verbal)

Immediately (verbal)

Written notification within
60 days (see Section 2.1 of
this Plan)




Immediately (verbal)

Written notification to be
made within 5 days.





Within 1 hour of discovery
(verbal).

Written notification within 7
working days.
                                      -17-
                                                                   Version 10.11/28/2005

-------
   A  Clearwater Oil Company, Ltd.
   til  Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility
Oil Spill Contingency Plan
Agency / Organization
Louisiana Department
of Environmental
Quality, Office of
Environmental
Compliance
Local Agencies
St. Anthony's Parish
Emergency Planning
Committee
Otters
Response/cleanup
contractors
Howard Fleming Farm
(agricultural irrigation
intake)
Maurice Richard
Jim Larouche
Peter Martin
Agency Contact
225-763-3908
or 225-342-1 234
(after business
hours, weekends
and holidays)

337-828-1960

EZCtean
(800)521-3211
Armadillo Oil
Removal Co.
(21 4) 566-5588
(405) 235-6893
405-830-2186
405-832-2645
405-832-5527
Circumstances' ; :
Discharges that do not pose
emergency conditions

Any discharge of 1 00 Ibs or
more that occurs beyond the
boundaries of the facility,
including to the air.

Any discharge that exceeds the
capacity of facility personnel to
respond and clean up.
Any discharge that threatens to
affect neighboring properties
and irrigation intakes.
When deploying response
equipment from Access Point
BB1 on Big Bear Creek.
When deploying response
equipment from Access Point
BB2 on Big Bear Creek.
When deploying response
equipment from Access Point
BBS on Big Bear Creek.
When to Notify o!
Within 24 hours of
discovery (verbal).
Written notification within 7
working days.

Immediately (verbal)
Written notification within 7
days.

As needed
As needed
As needed
As needed
As needed
The person reporting the discharge must provide the following information:

              Name, location, organization, and telephone number
       *       Name and address of the owner/operator
              Date and time of the incident
              Location of the incident
              Source and cause of discharge
              Types of materials) discharged
              Total quantity of materials discharged
              Quantity discharged in harmful quantity (to navigable waters or adjoining
              shorelines)
              Danger or threat posed by the release or discharge
              Description of all affected media (e.g., water, soil)
                                          -18-
                                                                          VersionlO. 11/28/2005

-------
        Clearwater Oil Company, Ltd.
        Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility
Oil Spill Contingency Plan
       •      Number and types of injuries (if any) and damaged caused
             Weather conditions
             Actions used to stop, remove, and mitigate effects of the discharge
       *      Whether an evacuation is needed
             Name of individuals and/or organizations contacted
       •      Any other information that may help emergency personnel respond to the
             incident

Whenever the facility discharges more than 1,000 gallons of oil in a single event, or discharges
more than 42 gallons of oil in each of two discharge incidents within a 12-month period, the
Manager of Field Operations must provide the following information to the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency's Regional Administrator within 60 days:

             Name of the facility
             Name of the owner or operator
             Location of the facility
       •      Maximum storage or handling capacity and normal daily throughput
       •      Corrective actions and countermeasures taken, including a description of
             equipment repairs and replacements
             Description of facility, including maps, flow diagrams, and topographical maps
             Cause of the discharge(s) to navigable waters, including a failure analysis of the
             system and subsystems in which the failure occurred.
       •      Additional preventive measures taken or contemplated to minimize possibility of
             recurrence
             Other pertinent information requested by the Regional Administrator.
                                          -19-
                                                                         VersionlQ, 11/28/2005

-------
        C/earwafer O/7 Company, Ltd.
        Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility
                                                Oil Spill Contingency Plan
                          Discharge Notification Form
*** Notification must not be delayed if information or individuals are not available. Additional pages may be attached to
supplement information contained in the form.

Facility:         Clearwater Oil Company Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility
               5800 Route 417
               Madison, Louisiana 73506
Description of Discharge
Date/time
Reporting Individual
Location of discharge
Equipment source
Product
Appearance and
description
Environmental conditions
Impacts ' ' •::;;' .^:-;- V^

Release date:
Release time:
Duration:
Name:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Q piping
D flowline
Dwell
D unknown
D stock, flare
D crude oil
D saltwater
D other*
Wind direction:
Wind speed:


Discovery date:
Discovery time:
Tel. #:
Description:
Description:
Equipment ID:
* Describe other:
Rainfall:
Current

 Quantity
Released:
Recovered:
 Receiving medium
 Describe circumstances
 of the release
D water"
IHIand
D other (describe):
D Release confined to company property.
D Release outside company property.
** If water, indicate extent and body of water:
 Assessment of impacts
 and remedial actions
 Disposal method for
 recovered material
 Action taken to prevent
 incident from reoccurring
                                               -20-
                                                                                  VersiorMO, 11/28/2005

-------
       Clearwater Oil Company, Ltd.
       Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility
                                                Oil Spill Contingency Plan
Safety issues
D Injuries
Q Fatalities
D Evacuation
Notifications
Agency
Name
Date/time reported & Comments
Company Spill
Response Coordinator

National Response
Center
1-800-424-8802

State police

Parish Emergency
Response Commission
OSRO/cleanup
contractor
                                              -21-
                                                                                 Version 1.0,11^28/2005

-------
Clearwater Oil Company, Ltd.
Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility
Oil Spill Contingency Plan
                     Appendix C
          SITE PLAN AND FACILITY DIAGRAM























.•'' ( / i ! . ; #••*••
i . ': (o /^ 1 , 	 "i 	 -^
i / 1 //, ' i ' f\
- — • -i ; 1 ' l/'i I i" /
• 1 *" 1 ^L ; i ("" !
% •• ' III ' : /
X ' ' M \-S
%, '• \ ^ A, I
/ '•% - ; ! i „ i : • i
/ S* •• i „ : ; Lirv.r^i.%.
/ \, i • W ^4'***'" ! **«%
/T./^^V-^ '^. i f:j /i
^ , / *
/ / j.
1 j f
/
~'7 / ' /••
: 7n
-/^'--J.^'V/
^' •' X/:
/,'• • ,• *'
'••: : _Ji -WT*
^nlR
/ ' ' I/'
/ / ' If"
/ / / /
? '

/ * i
• .- /i
/** * i
.M// /
• .1» •' V I A.-N
' • ' •• • V
r j t. •• ]
I- / 'i ^,: I
il • I 11 ^"^1 - f
II . . «=»•- \ , . . :
-'• • ' r~~\r\^ /; |: (
'; rj i 7e • ,Bigi;! -
I ,! ''; Beaf/' ", •'
/ :i ' Ci^e* I —- • -""T"
•• : 1 -/ , . Jnl'S t'^l' JLCjWC.r.-y4^5; f?"-\ *1^'' — "' • > ~^- ;
r— H-r "" i; " "^-^w Jr 	 ,i| It • • ™? ' t \
!} ! 1\ A \'. ^ \
i( . •L-J|rt--\L, \
-.-: -- — - • 1 /^% ™ P. ' V
Staging Wea*^ % ^,5J^«=4"^-
<5o' . ^Jplj V . J •>
f """' it a i ^1*11 ^^s -^1"* ^"*x \
r\ I *^
-------
 Ctearwater Oil Company, Ltd.
 Big Bear Lease No. 2 Production Facility
                          Oil Spill Contingency Plan
                      •AW r !<*•«


i
T:: S»:&y->x->
#i(s,v;-af 'f*'
"Wos. :«BS*
SI WSS
(M* ftOX J)
t
3 	

.

,




/' *' \
	 j f«T;«!S j
\ -j'X' S*'.'x-: '--x
^.i^
/%/\
{ *««&! |"-"|
.^-i->. V t>x»0i /
/ fi \ \ /
_/-vj 5»ffi« \ ....:;jc:. 	 s
V/ V Pr««».< f ,x"~~~v.
Sa:r*oft«' \ y*'i>w tf/ / ^, \ j
t>-x«:.; "--._,-" j ^^ \ j
s Cti«*W .••
\
N 	 ,'
/ *< \
! <»:!is I 	
\ CruiicOS /
- x^^ >4,.^
                            .-Jl

I >
\ 1
ll 1
11 I
'•! I
H i
i\ t

Lgj
>.
•:
J;
i
\











                                            S i
                    li*:-fl3K
                  c. fc«fi:n
    Clearwater Oil Company
Big dear Lease No. 2 Production Facility
            Facittty Diagram
            Rev.'11/12/02
Figure C-2: Facility Diagram.
                                     -23-
                                                                      VersionlO, 11/28/2005

-------
                       U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                SPCC FIELD INSPECTION AND PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST

                        FOR USE AT ONSHORE FACILITIES (EXCLUDING PRODUCTION)
Overview of the Checklist

This checklist is designed to assist EPA inspectors in conducting a thorough and consistent
inspection of a facility's compliance with the Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure
(SPCC) rule at 40 CFR part 112. It is a tool to help federal inspectors (or their contractors)
record observations during the site visit and review of the SPCC Plan. While the checklist is
comprehensive, the inspector should always refer to the SPCC rule in its entirety, the SPCC
Regional Inspector Guidance Document, and other relevant guidance for evaluating
compliance.  This checklist must be completed in order for an inspection to count toward an
agency measure (i.e., OEM/OECA inspection measures or GPRA).

The checklist is organized according to the SPCC rule. Each item in the checklist identifies the
relevant section and paragraph in 40 CFR part 112 where that requirement is stated.
Sections 112.1 through 112.5 specify the applicability of the rule and requirements for the
preparation, implementation, and amendment of SPCC Plans. For these sections, the checklist
includes data fields to be completed, as well as several questions with "yes"  or "no" answers.

Sections 112.7 through 112.12 specify requirements for spill prevention, control, and
countermeasures.  For these sections, the inspector needs to evaluate whether the requirement
is addressed adequately or inadequately in the SPCC Plan and whether it is implemented
adequately in the field  (either by field observation or record review).  For the  SPCC Plan and
implementation in the field, if a requirement is addressed adequately, mark the "Yes" box in the
appropriate column. If a requirement is not addressed adequately, mark the "No" box.  If a
requirement does not apply to the particular facility, mark the "NA" box. If a provision of the rule
applies only to the SPCC Plan, the "Field" column is shaded.

Space is provided in each section to record comments. Additional space is available on the
comments page at the end of the checklist. Comments should remain factual and support the
evaluation of compliance.

Appendix A is for recording information about containers and other locations at the facility that
require secondary containment.

Appendix B is a checklist for documentation of the tests and inspections the  facility operator is
required to keep with the SPCC Plan.

Appendix C is a checklist for oil removal contingency plans. A contingency plan is required if a
facility determines that secondary containment is impracticable as provided in 40 CFR 112.7(d).
Onshore Facilities {Excluding Production)
Page 1 of 16
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
                            U.S. ENVIROMMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                      SPCC FIELD INSPECTION AND PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST
                             FOR USE AT ONSHORE FACILITIES (EXCLUDING PRODUCTION)
 FAOllJT* INFORMATION
 FACILITY NAME:
 ADDRESS:
                                                          LAT:
 CITY:
 TELEPHONE:
                             STATE:      | ZIP:
                             FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE NAME:
                 COUNTY:
                                LONG:
 OWNER NAME:
 OWNER ADDRESS:
 CITY:
 TELEPHONE:
                             STATE:
ZIP:
                             OWNER CONTACT PERSON:
 FACILITY OPERATOR NAME (IF DIFFERENT FROM OWNER - IF NOT, PRINT "SAME"):
 OPERATOR ADDRESS:
                              STATE:
CITY:
TELEPHONE:
ZIP:
                              OPERATOR CONTACT PERSON:
 FACILITY TYPE:
 HOURS PER DAY FACILITY ATTENDED:
 TYPE(S) OF OIL STORED:
                                                          NAICS CODE:
                                         TOTAL FACILITY CAPACITY:
 IS FACILITY LOCATED IN INDIAN COUNTRY? D YES  D NO  IF YES, RESERVATION NAME:
 INSPECTION DATE:
 LEAD INSPECTOR:
                              TIME:
          INSPECTION NUMBER.
 OTHER INSPECTOR(S):
 INSPECTOR ACKNOWLEDGMENT
 / performed an SPCC inspection at the fscility specified above.
 INSPECTOR SIGNATURE:
                                                                     DATE:
Onshore Facilities (Excluding Production)
                                       Page 2 of 16
                                       Version 1.0

-------
 T&ClLff YfcESPONSE PLAN (FRP) APPLICABILITY
 A non-transportation related onshore facility is required to prepare and implement an FRP as outlined in 40 CFR 112.20 if:
 D  The facility transfers oil over water to or from vessels and has a total oil storage capacity greater than or equal to 42,000 gallons,
     OR

 The facility has a total oil storage capacity of at least 1 million gallons, and at least one of the following is true:
 D  The facility does not have secondary containment sufficiently large to contain the capacity of the largest aboveground tank plus
     sufficient freeboard for precipitation.
 O  The facility is located at a distance such that a discharge could cause injury to fish and wildlife and sensitive environments.
 D  The facility is located such that a discharge would shut down a public drinking water intake.
 D  The facility has had a reportable discharge greater than or equal to 10,000 gallons in the past 5 years.
 Facility has FRP:  D Yes D No  D Not Required
                                                   FRP Number:
  Facility has a completed and signed copy of Appendix C, Attachment C-ll, "Certification of the Applicability of the Substantial Harm
  Criteria."                                                                                  D Yes  D No
  Comments:
        GENERAL APPLICABILITY^*) CFR 112;1
 IS THE FACILITY REGULATED UNDER 40 CFR part 112?
 The completely buried oil storage capacity is over 42,000 gallons, OR the aggregate aboveground oil storage capacity is over 1,320
 gallons                                                                                   Q Yes D No AND

 The facility is a non-transportation-related facility engaged in drilling, producing, gathering, storing, processing, refining, transferring,
 distributing, using, or consuming oil and oil products, which due to its location could reasonably be expected to discharge oil into or
 upon the navigable waters of the United States (as defined in 40 CFR 110.1).                      D Yes D No
 AFFECTED WATERWAY(S):

 PATH:
                                                                                   DISTANCE:
 Note: The following storage capacity is not considered in determining applicability ofSPCC requirements:
     Completely buried tanks subject to all the technical requirements of 40 CFR part 280 or a state program approved under 40 CFR part 281.
     Equipment subject to the authority of the U.S. Department of Transportation, U.S. Department of the Interior, or Minerals Management Service,
     as defined in Memoranda of Understanding dated November 24, 1971, and November 8, 1993.
     Any facility or part thereof used exclusively for o/astewater treatment (production, recovery or recycling of oil is not considered wastewater
     treatment).
 *   Containers smaller man 55 gallons.
 '   Permanently closed containers.
 Does the facility have an SPCC Plan?

 Comments:
                                                                                          Q Yes  DNo
REQUlREMeNTS F Oft PjtEPARAtidM AMD IMPLEMENTATION
                                                                                                112.3
 Date facility began operations:

 Date of initial SPCC Plan preparation:
                                                              Current plan version (date/number):
  112.3(a)
           For facilities in operation prior to August 16, 2002:
               Plan amended by February 17, 2006
                                                                                           O Yes D No  D NA
            •   Amended Plan implemented by August 18, 2006

            For facilities beginning operation between August 17, 2002, and August 18,
            2006, Plan prepared and fully implemented by August 18, 2006	
                                                                                          D Yes  D No D NA
                                                                                          D Yes  D No  D NA
Onshore Facilities (Excluding Production)
                                                    Page 3 of 16
Version 1.0

-------
RE<&ftl^Efri Fi« f RlPAR/iTiQN MJb iMPiEMfeNf /itliJN & A SNc f L4N--4P; C|R
1 12.3(b) For facilities beginning operation after August 18, 2006, Plan prepared and fully
& (c) implemented before beginning operations
112.3
DYes DNo

DNA
112.3(d) Professional Engineer certification includes statement that the PE attests:
• PE is familiar with the requirements of 40 CFR part 112 D Yes D No
• PE or agent has visited and examined the facility D Yes D No
• Plan is prepared in accordance with good engineering practice including consideration of
applicable industry standards and the requirements of 40 CFR part 1 12 D Yes D No
• Procedures for required inspections and testing have been established D Yes D No
• Plan is adequate for tie facility D Yes D No
PE Name: I License No.: State: Date of certification:
1 1 2.3(e) Plan available onsite if facility is attended at least 4 hours/day
(If located at nearest field office, please note contact information below)
DYes DNo
DNA
Comments:
AMESII2pgJMT;O£Sp^^ -^ ;i '-ii' IU?H J:- -^ ;f :
1 12.4(a) Has the facility discharged a re portable quantity of oil in amounts considered harmful: more
than 1 ,000 gallons of oil ina single discharge or more than 42 gallons in each of two
discharges in any 12-month period (see 40 CFR part 1 10)?
• If yes. was information submitted to the RA as required in §1 1 2.4(a)?
• Date(s) of reportable dischargers):
• Were they reported to the NRC?
112.4(d), (e) Have changes required by the RA been implemented in the Plan and/or facility?
Comments:
DYes DNo
D Yes DNo
DYes D No
DYes DNo
D NA
DNA
DNA
Al|ENpttENT$F$PN ^ 5 ^
1 12.5(a) Has there been a change at the facility that materially affects the potential for a discharge?
• If so, was the Plan amended within six months of the change?
DYes DNo
D Yes DNo
112. 5(b) Review and evaluation of the Plan documented at least once every 5 years? D Yes D No
• Following Plan review, and if amendment was required, was Plan amended within six D Yes D No
months to include more effective prevention and control technology, if available?
112.5(c) Professional Engineer certification of any technical Plan amendments in accordance with D Yes O No
§112.3(d)
Name: License No.: ] State: Date of certification:
Reason for amendment:
Amendments implemented within six months of any Plan amendment
D Yes DNo
DNA
DNA
DNA
DNA
DNA
DNA
Comments:
Onshore Facilities (Excluding Production)
Page 4 of 16
Version 1.0

-------
INDICATE IF ITEM IS ADDRESSED ADEQUATELY (Yes), INADEQUA TEL Y (No), OR IS NOT APPLICABLE (NA) IN PLAN AND FIELD.
                    REQUIREMENTS—40 CFR 112.7
                                                 PLAN    FIELD
  Management approval at a level of authority to commit the necessary resources to fully implement the Plan    D Yes D No
  Name:
                 Title:
  Plan follows sequence of the rule or provides a cross-reference of requirements in the Plan and the rule
Date:

D Yes
[UNo
  If Plan calls for facilities, procedures, methods, or equipment not yet fully operational, details of their installation
  and start-up are discussed (Note: Relevant for inspection evaluation and testing baselines.)
             I
  112.7(a){2)  ]  If there are deviations from the requirements of the rule, the Plan states reasons for
             '  nonconformance
              Alternative measures described in detail and provide equivalent environmental protection (Note:
              Inspector should document if the environmental equivalence is implemented in the field)
                                                 OYes
                                                 DNo
                                                 DNA

                                                 DYes
                                                 DNo
                                                 DNA

                                                 DYes
                                                 DNo
                                                 DNA
  Describe each deviation and reasons for nonconformance:
  112.7(a)(3)  Plan includes diagram with location and contents of all regulated containers (including completely
             buried tanks otherwise exempt from the SPCC requirements), transfer stations, and connecting
             pipes

  112.7(a)(3)  Plan addresses each of the following:
                                                 DYes
                                                 DNo
                                                 DNA
        (i)  For each container, type of oil and storage capacity (see Appendix A)
        (ii)  Discharge prevention measures, including procedures for routine handling of products
        (iii) Discharge or drainage controls, such as secondary containment around containers, and other
            structures, equipment, and procedures for the control of a discharge

        (iv) Countermeasures for discharge discovery, response, and cleanup (both facility's and contractor's
            resources)
        (v)  Methods of disposal of recovered materials in accordance with applicable legal requirements
        (vi) Contact list and phone numbers for the facility response coordinator, National Response Center,
            cleanup contractors contracted to respond to a discharge, and all Federal, State, and local agencies
            who must be contacted in the case of a discharge as described in §112.1 (b)
                                                 DYes
                                                 DNo
                                                 DNA

                                                 DYes
                                                 DNo
                                                 DNA
                                                 DYes
                                                 DNo
                                                 DNA

                                                 DYes
                                                 DNo
                                                 UNA
                                                 DYes
                                                 DNo
                                                 DNA

                                                 D Yes
                                                 DNo
                                                 ONA
  Comments:
         DYes
         DNo
         DNA
         OYes
         DNo
         DNA
         D Yes
         DNo
         DNA

         DYes
         DNo
         DNA
         DYes
         DNo
         DNA

         DYes
         DNo
         DNA
Onshore Facilities (Excluding Production)
Page 5 of  16
       Version 1.0

-------
INDICATE IF ITEM IS ADDRESSED ADEQUA TEL Y (Yes). INADEQUA TEL Y (No), OR IS NOT APPLICABLE (NA) IN PLAN AND FIELD.
 GENERAL SPCC REQUfREMENTS—40 CFR 112,7
                                                 PLAN    FIELD
  112.7(a)(4) Plan includes information and procedures that enable a person reporting a discharge as described
            in §112.1 (b) to relate information on the exact address or location and phone number of the facility;
            the date and time of the discharge: the type of material discharged: estimates of the total quantity
            discharged; estimates of the quantity discharged as described in §112.1 (b); the source of the
            discharge; a description of all affected media; the cause of the discharge; any damages or injuries
            caused by the discharge; actions being used to stop, remove, and mitigate the effects of the
            discharge; whether an evacuation may be needed; and the names of individuals and/or
            organizations who have also been contacted (Not required if a facility has an FRP)

  112.7(a)(5) Plan organized so that portions describing procedures to be used when a discharge occurs will be
            readily usable in an emergency (Not required if a facility has an FRP}
                                                 D Yes
                                                 DNo
                                                 DNA
                                                 DYes
                                                 DNo
                                                 DNA
 112.7(b)   Plan includes a prediction of the direction, rate of flow, and total quantity of oil that could be
            discharged for each type of major equipment failure where experience indicates a reasonable
            potential for equipment failure
                                                 DYes
                                                 DNo
                                                 DNA
 112.7(c)    Appropriate containment and/or diversionary structures provided to prevent a discharge as
            described in §112.1 (b) before cleanup occurs. The entire containment system, including walls and
            floors, are capable of containing oil and are constructed to prevent escape of a discharge from the
            containment system before cleanup occurs. (1) For onshore facilities, one of the following or its
            equivalent: (i) dikes, berms, or retaining walls sufficiently impervious to contain oil, (ii) curbing, (iii)
            culverting, gutters or other drainage systems, (iv) weirs, booms or other barriers, (v) spill diversion
            ponds, (vi) retention ponds, or (vii) sorbent materials (See Appendix A)

 112.7(d)     Determination(s) of impracticability of secondary containment

             If YES, is the impracticability of secondary containment clearly demonstrated?
                                                 a Yes
                                                 a NO
                                                 DNA
                                                 DYes
                                                 QNo

                                                 DYes
                                                 DNo
                                                 DNA
             Comments concerning impracticability determination(s) for secondary containment:
             If impracticability determination is made, for bulk storage containers, periodic integrity testing of
             containers and leak testing of the valves and piping associated with the container is conducted

             If impracticability determination is made, unless facility has FRP:
             (1)   Contingency Plan following 40 CFR part 109 (see Appendix C checklist) is provided AND
             (2)   Written commitment of manpower, equipment, and materials required to control and remove
                   any quantity of oil discharged that may be harmful

 112.7(e)    Inspections and tests conducted in accordance with written procedures
             Record of inspections or tests signed by supervisor or inspector and kept with Plan for at least 3
             years (see Appendix B checklist)
                                                 Q Yes
                                                 a NO
                                                 DNA

                                                 DYes
                                                 DNo
                                                 DNA
                                                 DYes
                                                 DNo
                                                 DNA

                                                 DYes
                                                 DNo
                                                 DNA
                                                 DYes
                                                 DNo
                                                 DNA
 Comments:
  DYes
  a NO
  DNA
  DYes
  DNo
  DNA
  D Yes
  D No
  DNA
  DYes
  ONo
  DNA
  DYes
  DNo
  DNA
   DYes
   DNo
   DNA
Onshore Facilities (Excluding Production)
PageS of  16
Version 1.0

-------
INDICATE IF ITEM IS ADDRESSED ADEQUATELY (Yes). INADEQUA TEL Y (No). OR IS NOT APPLICABLE (NA) IN PLAN AND FIELD.

tScNtRAL SrCC KtQUJREMtNTS— 40 CFR 11 2.7: ^ : : •' ' : • ' •• '*. '•• i;^f- • . ....... •.-.?•:'••:". ; . : . .: :. :-...::.v.:. •:•"''
>M$-:.-:
FIELD
11 2.7(f) Personnel, training, and oil discharge prevention procedures
(1 ) Training of oil-handling personnel in operation and maintenance of equipment to prevent discharges;
discharge procedure protocols; applicable pollution control laws, rules and regulations; general facility
operations; and contents of SPCC Plan
(2) Person designated as accountable for discharge prevention at the facility
(3) Discharge prevention briefings conducted at least once a year for oil handling personnel
1 12.7(g) Security (excluding production facilities)
(1 ) Facility fully fenced and gates are locked and/or guarded when facility is unattended
(2) Master flow and drain valves and any other valves permitting direct outward flow of the container's
contents to the surface have adequate security measures so that they remain in the closed position when
in non-operating or non-standby status
(3) Pump starter controls locked in "off" position and accessible only to authorized personnel when in non-
opera ting/non-standby status
(4) Loading/unloading connections of oil pipelines or facility piping securely capped or blank-flanged when not
in service or when in standby service for an extended period of time, including piping that is emptied of
liquid content either by draining or by inert gas pressure
(5) Adequate facility lighting commensurate with the type and location of the facility that assists in the
discovery of discharges occurring during hours of darkness and to prevent discharges occurring through
acts of vandalism
1 12.7(h) Tank car and tank truck loading/unloading rack*
{1} Does loading/unloading area (the location adjacent to the loading or unloading rack) drainage flow to
catchment basin or treatment facility? D Yes n No
• If NO, quick drainage system used
Containment system holds capacity of the largest single compartment of a tank car/truck
loaded/unloaded at the facility
(2) Physical barriers, warning signs, wheel chocks, or vehicle brake interlock system in loading/unloading
areas (the location adjacent to the loading or unloading rack) to prevent vehicles from departing before
complete disconnection of flexible or fixed oil transfer lines
(3) Lower-most drains and all outlets on tank cars/trucks inspected prior to filling/departure, and, if necessary
ensure that they are tightened, adjusted, or replaced to prevent liquid discharge while in transit
DYes
ONo
DNA
O Yes
ONo
DNA
DYes
DNo
DNA

DYes
DNO
DMA
DYes
DNo
DNA
DYes
DNo
DNA
DYes
QNo
DNA
DYes
GNo
ONA

DYes
DNo
DNA
DYes
DNo
UNA
DYes
Q No
DNA
DYes
DNo
DNA
DYes
DNo
DNA
DYes
D No
DNA
DYes
DNo
DNA

DYes
DNo
DNA
D Yes
DNo
DNA
D Yes
DNo
DNA
DYes
DNo
DNA
Q Yes
DNo
DNA
DYes
DNo
DNA
DYes
DNo
DNA
O Yes
LiNo
UNA
D Yes
DNo
DNA
Comments:
* Note that a tank car/truck loading/unloading rack must be present for §1 12.7(h) to apply
Onshore Facilities (Excluding Production)
Page 7 of 16
Version 1.0

-------
                                                 112.7
                                               li iPUWAi «F»EOC
  112,7(i)   Brittle fracture evaluation of field-constructed aboveground containers

  112.7(i)   Brittle fracture evaluation is conducted after tank repair/alteration/change in service that might affect
           the risk of a discharge or after a discharge/failure due to brittle fracture or other catastrophe, and
           appropriate action taken as necessary (for field-constructed aboveground containers)

  112.7(j)   State rules, regulations and guidelines and conformance with applicable sections of 40 CFR part 112
                                                 DYes
                                                 O NO
                                                 ONA
  112.7(j)  Discussion of conformance with applicable more stringent State rules, regulations, and guidelines and
          other effective discharge prevention and containment procedures listed in 40 CFR part 112

  Comments:
                                                 DYes
                                                 DNo
                                                 DMA
  DYes
  DNo
  DNA
 QSNSHORJE ilpJTIES (i^LUOINS PRODUCTION}—112.8/112,12
                                                  PtAN
   FIELD
 112.8(b)/112.12(b) Facility Drainage

 (1)   Drainage from diked storage areas is restrained by valves, OR manually activated pumps or ejectors are
       used and the condition of the accumulation is inspected prior to discharge to ensure no oil will be
       discharged.
 (2)   Valves from diked storage areas are manual, open-and-closed design (not flapper-type drain valves)
       If drainage is released directly to a watercourse and not into an onsrte waste water treatment plant, storm
       water inspected per§112.8(c)(3)(ii), (iii), and (iv)or §112.12(c)(3)(ii), (iii), and (iv)
 (3)  Drainage from undiked areas with a potential for discharge designed to flow into ponds, lagoons, or
      catchment basins to retain oil or return it to facility. Catchment basin located away from flood areas.*

 (4)  If facility drainage not engineered as in (b)(3), facility equipped with a diversion system to retain oil in the
      facility in the event of a discharge*
                                                  DYes
                                                  DNo
                                                  DNA
                                                  D Yes
                                                  DNo
                                                  DNA

                                                  DYes
                                                  ONo
                                                  DNA
                                                  DYes
                                                  DNo
                                                  DNA

                                                  Q Yes
                                                  O No
                                                  DNA
 (5)  Are facility drainage waters continuously treated in more than one treatment unit and pump transfer is needed?
      D Yes    D No    If YES:
         Two "lift" pumps available and at least one permanently installed
         Facility drainage systems engineered to prevent a discharge as described in §112.1 (b) in the case of
         equipment failure or human error
                                                  DYes
                                                  DNo
                                                  DNA
                                                  DYes
                                                  ONo
                                                  DNA
 Comments:
 * These provisions apply only when a facility drainage system is used for containment.
  DYes
  DNo
  DNA
  D Yes
  D No
  DNA

  DYes
  DNo
  DNA
   DYes
   DNo
   DNA

   DYes
   DNo
   DNA
   DYes
   DNo
   DNA
   DYes
   DNo
   DNA
Onshore Facilities (Excluding Production)
Page 8 of  16
Version 1.0

-------
INDICA TE IF ITEM IS ADDRESSED ADEQUA TELY (Yes), INADEQUA TEL Y (No), OR IS NOT APPLICABLE (NA) IN PLAN AND FIELD.

112.8(c)/112.12(c) Bulk Storage Containers (See Appendix A of this checklist)
(1 ) Containers compatible with material stored and conditions of storage such as pressure and temperature


(2) Secondary containment to hold capacity of largest container and sufficient freeboard for precipitation


Diked areas sufficiently impervious to contain discharged oil


Alternatively, any discharge to a drainage trench system will be safely confined in a facility catchment

basin or holding pond
DYes
DNo
DNA
DYes
DNo
DNA
DYes
DNO
DNA
DYes

DNA
DYes
DNo
DNA
DYes
GNo
DNA
DYes
DNo
DNA
DYes

DNA
(3) Is there drainage of uncontaminated rainwater from diked areas into a storm drain or open watercourse?
D Yes D No If YES:
(i) Bypass valve normally sealed closed


(ii) Retained rainwater is inspected to ensure that its presence will not cause a discharge as described in
R1 1 ^ 1 fh\
S ( )
(iii) Bypass valve opened and resealed under responsible supervision


(iv) Adequate records of drainage are kept; for example, records required under permits issued in
accordance with 40 CFR 1 22.41 (j)(2) and (m>(3)
DYes
DNo
DNA
DYes
DNo
C1NA
n Yes
UNO
DNA
D Yes
UNA
DYes
DNo
DNA
DYes
DNo
DNA
DYes
DNo
UNA
QYes
UNA
(4) For completely buried metallic tanks installed on or after January 10, 1974 (if not exempt from SPCC regulation because subject
to all of the technical requirements of 40 CFR part 280 or 281):
• Corrosion protection with coatings or cathodic protection compatible with local soil conditions


• Regular leak testing conducted


(5) Partially buried or bunkered metallic tanks protected from corrosion with coatings or cathodic protection

compatible with local soil conditions

DYes
DNo
DNA
DYes
DNo
DNA
DYes

UNA

DYes
DNo
DNA
DYes
DNo
DNA
DYes

DNA
Comments:
Onshore Facilities (Excluding Production)
Page 9 of 16
                                                                                                 Version 1.0

-------
INDICA TE IF ITEM IS ADDRESSED ADEQUA TEL Y (Yes), INADEQUA TEL Y (No), OR IS NOT APPLICABLE (NA) IN PLAN AND FIELD.
  ONSHORE FACILITIES (EXGLUDINGPRODUCTtONy—112,8/112.12
  112.8(c)/112.12(c) Bulk Storage Containers (continued)
  (6)
Aboveground containers integrity tested by visual inspection and another technique such as hydrostatic
testing, radiographic testing, ultrasonic testing, acoustic emissions testing, or another system of non-
destructive shell testing on a regular schedule and whenever material repairs are made
        Container supports and foundations regularly inspected
        Outside of containers frequently inspected for signs of deterioration, discharges, or accumulation of oil
        inside diked areas
        Records of inspections and tests maintained
 (7) Leakage through defective internal heating coils controlled:
     •   Steam returns and exhaust lines from internal heating coils that discharge into an open water source are
        monitored for contamination, OR
     •   Steam returns and exhaust lines pass through a settling tank, skimmer, or other separation or retention
        system
 (8) Each container equipped with at least one of the following for liquid level sensing: (i) high liquid level alarms
     with an audible or visual signal at a constantly attended operation or surveillance station, or audible air vent
     in smaller facilities, (ii) high liquid level pump cutoff devices set to stop flow at a predetermined container
     content level, (iii) direct audible or code signal communication between container ganger and pumping
     station, 
-------
INDICATE IF ITEM IS ADDRESSED ADEQUATELY (Yes), INADEQUA TEL Y (No). OR IS NOT APPLICABLE (NA) IN PLAN AND FIELD.
 ONSHORE FACILITIES (EXCiUJOiNG PRODOCftQNH112-1^^2.12
                                                                                                      FIEtD
 112.8(d)/112.12(d) Facility transfer operations, pumping, and facility process
 (D
Buried piping installed or replaced on or after August 16, 2002 has protective wrapping or coating
        Buried piping installed or replaced on or after August 16, 2002 is cathodically protected or otherwise
        satisfies corrosion protection standards for piping in 40 CFR part 280 or 281
       r~
         Exposed buried piping is inspected for deterioration and corrosion damage is examined and corrected

       i
  (2)  Piping terminal connection at the transfer point is marked as to origin and capped or blank-flanged when
      not in service or in standby service for an extended time
  (3)  Pipe supports are properly designed to minimize abrasion and corrosion and allow for expansion and
      contraction
  (4)
Aboveground valves, piping, and appurtenances such as flange joints, expansion joints, valve glands
and bodies, catch pans, pipeline supports, locking of valves, and metal surfaces are inspected regularly
         Integrity and leak testing conducted on buried piping at time of installation, modification, construction,
         relocation, or replacement

  (5)  Vehicles warned so that no vehicle endangers aboveground piping and other oil transfer operations
DYes
DNo
DNA

DYes
DNo
DNA
                                                                                             QVes
                                                                                             DNo
                                                                                             DNA

                                                                                             DYes
                                                                                             DNo
                                                                                             DNA
DYes
DNo
DMA

DYes
DNo
DNA
                                                                                             DYes
                                                                                             DNo
                                                                                             DNA

                                                                                             DYes
                                                                                             DNo
                                                                                             DNA
  Comments:
DYes
DNo
DNA

DYes
DNo
DNA
         DYes
         ONo
         DNA

         DYes
         DNo
         DNA
DYes
DNo
DNA

DYes
DNo
DNA
         DYes
         DNo
         DNA

         DYes
         DNo
         DNA
Onshore Facilities (Excluding Production)
                                             Page 11 of 16
       Version 1.0

-------

                                          ADDITIONAL
  Rule Provision
          Comment
Onshore Facilities (Excluding Production)
Page 12 of 16
                                                                                                    Version 1.0

-------
                                      :;: PHOTO DOCUMENTATtON LOG
  Photo Number
Description (include date and location)
Onshore Facilities (Excluding Production)
   Page 13 of 16
Version 1.0

-------
                      SPCC FIELD INSPECTION AND PLAN REVIEW TABLE
Appendix A: Documentation of Field Observations for Containers and Associated Requirements

Inspectors should use this table to document observations of containers as needed.
Containers and Piping
Check containers for leaks, specifically looking for: drip marks, discoloration of tanks, puddles containing spilled or leaked material,
corrosion, cracks, and localized dead vegetation, and standards/specifications of construction.
Check foundation for: cracks, discoloration, puddles containing spilled or leaked material, settling, gaps between container and
foundation, and damage caused by vegetation roots.
Check piping for: droplets of stored material, discoloration, corrosion, bowing of pipe between supports, evidence of stored material
seepage from valves or seals, and localized dead vegetation. (Document in comments section of §112.8(d) /§112.12(d).)

Secondary Containment (Active and Passive)
Check secondary containment for: containment system (including walls and floor) ability to contain oil such that oil will not escape the
containment system before cleanup occurs, proper sizing, cracks, discoloration presence of spilled or leaked material (standing liquid),
erosion, corrosion, and valve conditions
Check dike or berm systems for: level of precipitation in dike/available capacity, operational status of drainage valves (closed), dike
or berm impermeability, debris, erosion, impermeability of the earthen floor/walls of diked area, and location/status of pipes, inlets,
drainage around and beneath containers, presence of oil discharges within diked areas.
Check retention and drainage ponds for: erosion, available capacity, presence of spilled or leaked material, debris, and stressed
vegetation.
Check active measures (countermeasures) for: amount indicated in plan is available and appropriate; deployment procedures are
realistic; material is located so that they are readily available; efficacy of discharge detection; availability of personnel and training,
appropriateness of measures to prevent a discharge as described in  §112.1(b).
   Container IJW General Condition
Storage Capacity and
     Type of OH
Type of Containment/
  Drainage Control
Overfill Protection and
Testing & inspections
Onshore Facilities (Excluding Production)
               Page 14 of 16
                                           Version 1.0

-------
                           SPCC INSPECTION AND TESTING CHECKLIST
                      Appendix B: Required Documentation of Tests and Inspections
Records of inspections and tests required by 40 CFR part 112 signed by the appropriate supervisor or inspector must be kept with the
SPCC Plan for a period of three years. Records of inspections and tests conducted under usual and customary business practices will
suffice. Documentation of the following inspections and tests should be kept with the SPCC Plan.
                              Inspection or Test
                                                                                   Documentation
                                                                                Present
                                          Not
                                        Present
   Not
Applicable
  112.7-General SPCC Requirements

  (d)  Integrity testing is conducted for bulk storage containers with no secondary
      containment system and for which an impracticability determination has been
      made
  (d)  Integrity and leak testing of valves and piping associated with bulk storage
      containers with no secondary containment system and for which an
      impracticability determination has been made

  (i)   Evaluate field-constructed aboveground containers for potential for brittle fracture
      or other catastrophic failure when the container undergoes a repair, alteration,
      reconstruction or change in service

  112.8/112.12-Onshore facilities (excluding production)
 (b)(2)     Storm water released from facility drainage directly to a watercourse is
           inspected and records of drainage are kept
  (c)(3)(iv)  Rainwater released directly from diked containment areas to a storm drain
           or open watercourse is inspected and records of drainage are kept
           Regular leak testing of completely buried metallic storage tanks

           Aboveground containers, supports and foundations tested for integrity on a
           regular schedule

           Outside of containers frequently inspected for deterioration, discharges or
           accumulations of oil inside diked areas
            Liquid level sensing devices regularly tested to ensure proper operation

           Effluent treatment facilities are observed frequently enough to detect
           possible system upsets that could cause a discharge as described in
           When buried piping is exposed, it is carefully inspected for deterioration and
           corrosion damage is corrected
           Aboveground valves, piping and appurtenances are regularly inspected and
           the general condition of flange joints, expansion joints, valve glands and
           bodies, catch pans, pipeline supports, locking of valves, and metal surfaces
           are assessed
           Integrity and leak testing of buried piping is conducted at time of installation,
           modification, construction, relocation or replacement
 Comments:
Onshore Facilities (Excluding Production)
Page 15 of  16
   Version 1.0

-------
                          SPCC CONTINGENCY PLAN  REVIEW CHECKLIST
                  Appendix C:  40 CFR Part 109-Criteria for State, Local and Regional Oil
                                           Removal Contingency Plans
 If a facility makes an impracticability determination for secondary containment in accordance with §112.7(d), it is required to provide
 an oil spill contingency plan following 40 CFR part 109.
  109v5-De velopment and implementation criteria for State, local and regional oil removal contingency plans*
  (a) Definition of the authorities, responsibilities and duties of all persons, organizations or agencies which are to be
      involved in planning or directing oil removal operations.

  (b) Establishment of notification procedures for the purpose of early detection and timely notification of an oil
      discharge including:
      (1)   The identification of critical water use areas to facilitate the reporting of and response to oil discharges.

      (2)   A current list of names, telephone numbers and addresses of the responsible persons (with alternates) and
           organizations to be notified when an oil discharge is discovered.

      (3)   Provisions for access to a reliable communications system for timely notification of an oil discharge, and
           the capability of interconnection with the communications systems established under related oil removal
           contingency plans, particularly State and National plans (e.g., NCP).

      (4)   An established, prearranged procedure for requesting assistance during a major disaster or when the
           situation exceeds the response capability of the State, local or regional authority.

  (c)  Provisions to assure that full resource capability is known and can be committed during an oil discharge situation
      including:

      (1)   The identification and inventory of applicable equipment, materials and supplies which are available locally
           and regionally.

      (2)   An estimate of the equipment, materials and supplies which would be required to remove the maximum oil
           discharge to be anticipated.

      (3)   Development of agreements and arrangements in advance of an oil discharge for the acquisition of
           equipment, materials and supplies to be used in responding to such a discharge.
  (d) Provisions for well defined and specific actions to be taken after discovery and notification of an oil discharge
      including:
      (1)   Specification of an oil discharge response operating team consisting of trained, prepared and available
           operating personnel.
      (2}   Predesignation of a properly qualified oil discharge response coordinator who is charged with the
           responsibility and delegated commensurate authority for directing and coordinating response operations
           and who knows how to request assistance from Federal authorities operating under existing  national and
           regional contingency plans.

      (3)   A preplanned location for an oil discharge response operations center and a reliable communications
           system for directing the coordinated overall response operations.

      (4)   Provisions for varying degrees of response effort depending on the severity of the oil discharge.
      (5)   Specification of the order of priority in which the various water uses are to be protected where more than
           one water use may be adversely affected as a result of an oil discharge and where response operations
           may not be adequate to protect all uses.
  (e)  Specific and well defined procedures to facilitate recovery of damages and enforcement measures as provided
      for by State and local statutes and ordinances.	
I
 "The contingency plan should be consistent with all applicable state and local plans, Area Contingency Plans, and the National
 Contingency Plan (NCP).
Onshore Facilities (Excluding Production)                Page 16 of  16                                         Version 1.0

-------
                             U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                       SPCC FIELD INSPECTION AND PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST
                            ONSHORE OIL PRODUCTION, DRILLING, AND WORKOVER FACILITIES
      Overview of the Checklist

      This checklist is designed to assist EPA inspectors in conducting a thorough and consistent
      inspection of a facility's compliance with the Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure
      (SPCC) rule at 40 CFR part 112. It is a tool to help federal inspectors (or their contractors)
      record observations during the site visit and review of the SPCC Plan. While the checklist is
      comprehensive, the inspector should always refer to the SPCC rule in its entirety, the SPCC
      Regional Inspector Guidance Document, and other relevant guidance for evaluating
      compliance. This checklist must be completed in order for an inspection to count toward an
      agency measure (i.e., OEM/OECA inspection measures or GPRA).

      The checklist is organized according to the SPCC rule. Each item in the checklist identifies the
      relevant section and paragraph in 40 CFR part 112 where that requirement is stated.
      Sections 112.1 through 112.5 specify the applicability of the rule and requirements for the
      preparation, implementation, and amendment of SPCC Plans. For these sections, the checklist
      includes data fields to be completed, as well as several questions with "yes" or "no" answers.

      Sections 112.7 through 112.11 specify requirements for spill prevention, control, and
      countermeasures. For these sections, the inspector needs to evaluate whether the requirement
      is addressed adequately or inadequately in the SPCC Plan and whether it is implemented
      adequately in the field (either by field observation or record review). For the SPCC Plan and
      implementation in the field, if a requirement is addressed adequately, mark the "Yes" box in the
      appropriate column.  If a requirement is not addressed adequately, mark the "No" box. If a
      requirement does not apply to the particular facility, mark the "NA" box. If a provision of the rule
      applies only to the SPCC Plan, the "Field" column is shaded.

      Space is provided in each section to record comments. Additional space is available on the
      comments page at the end of the checklist. Comments should remain factual and support the
      evaluation of compliance.

      Appendix A is for recording information about containers and other locations at the facility that
      require secondary containment.

      Appendix B is a checklist for documentation of the tests and inspections the facility operator is
      required to keep with the SPCC Plan.

      Appendix C is a checklist for oil removal contingency plans. A contingency plan is required if a
      facility determines that secondary containment is impracticable as provided in 40 CFR 112.7(d).
Onshore Oil Production, Drilling, & Workover Facilities
Page 1 of 14
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
                     U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
               SPCC FIELD INSPECTION AND PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST
                 ONSHORE OIL PRODUCTION, DRILLING, AND WORKOVER FACILITIES
 FACILITY INRORMAfJON
 FACILITY NAME:
 ADDRESS:
 CITY:
                             STATE:
j ZIP:
LAT:
COUNTY:
                                                                         LONG:
 TELEPHONE:
                             FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE NAME:
 OWNER NAME:
 OWNER ADDRESS:
 CITY:
                             STATE:
 ZIP:
 TELEPHONE:
                             OWNER CONTACT PERSON:
 FACILITY OPERATOR NAME (IF DIFFERENT FROM OWNER - IF NOT, PRINT "SAME"):
 OPERATOR ADDRESS:
 CITY:
                             STATE:
; ZIP:
 TELEPHONE:
                             OPERATOR CONTACT PERSON:
 FACILITY TYPE:
                                                          NAICS CODE:
                                          TOTAL FACILITY CAPACITY:
HOURS PER DAY FACILITY ATTENDED:
TYPE(S) OF OIL STORED:
IS FACILITY LOCATED IN INDIAN COUNTRY? D YES  D NO  IF YES, RESERVATION NAME:
 INSPECTION INFORMATION
 INSPECTION DATE:
                              TIME:
           INSPECTION NUMBER:
 LEAD INSPECTOR:
 OTHER INSPECTOR(S):
 INSPECTOR ACKNOWLEDGMENT
 / performed an SPCC inspection at the facility specified above.
 INSPECTOR SIGNATURE:
                                                                     DATE:
Onshore Oil Production, Drilling, & Workover Facilities
                                       Page 2 of 14
                                Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
 FACILITY RESPONSE PUN (FRP) APPLICABILITY
 A non-transportation related onshore facility is required to prepare and implement an FRP as outlined in 40 CFR 112.20 if:

 D  The facility transfers oil over water to or from vessels and has a total oil storage capacity greater than or equal to 42,000 gallons,
     OR
 The facility has a total oil storage capacity of at least 1 million gallons, and at least one of the following is true:
 D  The facility does not have secondary containment sufficiently large to contain the capacity of the largest aboveground tank plus
     sufficient freeboard for precipitation.
 D  The facility is located at a distance such that a discharge could cause injury to fish and wildlife and sensitive environments.
 D  The facility is located such that a discharge would shut down a public drinking water intake.
 D  The facility has had a reportable discharge greater than or equal to 10,000 gallons in the past 5 years.

 Facility has FRP:  D Yes D No  D Not Required      j FRP Number:

 Facility has a completed and signed copy of Appendix C, Attachment C-ll, "Certification of the Applicability of the Substantial Harm
 Criteria"                                                                                        D Yes  D No

 Comments:
 SPCGSENERAL APPLICABiLITY—40 CFR 112.1
 IS THE FACILITY REGULATED UNDER 40 CFR part 112?
 The completely buried oil storage capacity is over 42,000 gallons, OR the aggregate aboveground oil storage capacity is over 1,320
 gallons                                                                                   D Yes  D No AND

 The facility is a non-transportation-related facility engaged in drilling, producing, gathering, storing, processing, refining, transferring,
 distributing, using, or consuming oil and oil products, which due to its location could reasonably be expected to discharge oil into or
 upon the navigable waters of the United States (as defined in 40 CFR 110.1).                      D Yes  D No
 AFFECTED WATERWAY(S):

 PATH:
                                                                                   DISTANCE:
 Note: The following storage capacity is not considered in determining applicability ofSPCC requirements:
     Completely buried tanks subject to all the technical requirements of 40 CFR part 280 or a state program approved under 40 CFR part 281.
     Equipment subject to the authority of the U.S. Department of Transportation, U.S. Department of the Interior, or Minerals Management Service,
     as defined in Memoranda of Understanding dated November 24, 1971, and November 8, 1993.
 •   Any facility or part thereof used exclusively for wastewater treatment (production, recovery or recycling of oil is not considered wastewater
     treatment).
 •   Containers smaller than 55 gallons.
 •   Permanently closed containers.
 Does the facility have an SPCC Plan?

 Comments:
                                                                                          D Yes  D No
REQUIREMENTS FOR PREPARAf ION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF A SPCC ^
                                                                                           CFR 112.3
  Date facility began operations:
 Date of initial SPCC Plan preparation:
                                                              Current plan version (date/number):
 112.3(a)
           For facilities in operation prior to August 16, 2002:
              Plan amended by February 17, 2006

           •   Amended Plan implemented by August 18, 2006
                                                                                           DYes  DNo  (UNA

                                                                                           D Yes  D No  D NA
            For facilities beginning operation between August 17, 2002, and August 18,
            2006, Plan prepared and fully implemented by August 18, 2006	
                                                                                            Yes  D No  D NA
Onshore Oil Production, Drilling, & Workover Facilities
                                                    Page 3 of 14
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
iiQUllliMENll FOR ! PREPiftiRATJQN ANGf IMPILf MENTATION OF A SPCC pl^N---|ij; CF
1 12.3(b) For facilities beginning operation after August 18, 2006, Plan prepared and fully
& (c) implemented before beginning operations
R 112.3 '"-::
D Yes D No

DNA
112.3(d) Professional Engineer certification includes statement that the PE attests:
• PE is familiar with the requirements of 40 CFR part 112 DYes DNo
• PE or agent has visited and examined the facility D Yes D No
• Plan is prepared in accordance with good engineering practice including consideration of
applicable industry standards and the requirements of 40 CFR part 1 12 DYes DNo
• Procedures for required inspections and testing have been established DYes DNo
* Plan is adequate for the facility D Yes D No
PE Name: j License No.: State: Date of certification:
1 1 2.3(e) Plan available onsite if facility is attended at least 4 hours/day
(If located at nearest field office, please note contact information below)
DYes DNo
DNA
Comments:
AMENDMENT OF SPGC P^
1 12.4(a) Has the facility discharged a reportable quantity of oil in amounts considered harmful more
than 1 ,000 gallons of oil in a single discharge or more than 42 gallons in each of two
discharges in any 1 2-month period {see 40 CFR part 1 10)?
• If yes, was information submitted to the RA as required in §1 12 4(a)?
• Date(s) of reportable discharge(s):
• Were they reported to the NRC?
1 12.4(d), (e) Have changes required by the RA been implemented in the Plan and/or facility?
DYes DNo
DYes DNo
DYes DNo
DYes DNo
DNA
DNA
DNA
DNA
Comments:
AMENDMENT OF SPCC PLAN BY THE OWNER OR OPERATOR— 40 CFR 112.5
112.5(a) Has there been a change at the facility that materially affects the potential fora discharge?
• If so, was the Plan amended within six months of Ihe change?
1 12,5(b) Review and evaluation of the Plan documented at least once every 5 years?
• Following Plan review, and if amendment was required, was Plan amended within six
months to include more effective prevention and control technology, if available?
1 12.5(c) Professional Engineer certification of any technical Plan amendments in accordance with
§112.3(d)
D Yes D No
DYes DNo
DYes DNo
DYes DNo
DYes DNo
DNA
DNA
DNA
DNA
D NA
Name: License No.: State: Date of certification:
Reason for amendment:
Amendments implemented within six months of any Plan amendment
Comments:
DYes DNo
DNA
Onshore Oil Production, Drilling, & Workover Facilities     Page 4 of 14
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
INDICATE IF ITEM IS ADDRESSED ADEQUATEL Y (Yes). INADEQUATELY (No), OR IS NOT APPLICABLE (NA) IN PLAN AND FIELD.
GENERAL SPCC REQUIRE MENTS-4Q CFR 1 12.7
PLAN
FIELD
Management approval at a level of authority to commit the necessary resources to fully implement the Plan O Yes D No
Name: Title: Date:
Plan follows sequence of the rule or provides a cross-reference of requirements in the Plan and the rule

If Plan calls for facilities, procedures, methods, or equipment not yet fully operational, details of their installation
and start-up are discussed (Note: Relevant for inspection evaluation and testing baselines.)
1 12.7{a)(2) If there are deviations from the requirements of the rule, the Plan states reasons for
nonoonformance
Alternative measures described in detail and provide equivalent environmental protection (Note:
Inspector should document if the environmental equivalence is implemented in the field)
D Yes
QNo
n Yes
DNO
GNA
D Yes
Q No
DNA
D Yes
CJNo
DNA




':
!
D Yes
QNo
DNA
Describe each deviation and reasons for nonconformance:
1 1 2.7(a)(3} Plan includes diagram with location and contents of all regulated containers (including completely
buried tanks otherwise exempt from the SPCC requirements), transfer stations, and connecting
prpes
1 1 2.7(a)(3) Plan addresses each of the following:
(i) For each container, type of oil and storage capacity (see Appendix A)


(ii) Discharge prevention measures, including procedures for routine handling of products


(iii) Discharge or drainage controls, such as secondary containment around containers, and other
structures, equipment, and procedures for the control of a discharge
(iv) Countermeasures for discharge discovery, response, and cleanup (both facility's and contractor's

resources)
(v) Methods of disposal of recovered materials in accordance with applicable legal requirements


(vi) Contact list and phone numbers for the facility response coordinator, National Response Center,
cleanup contractors contracted to respond to a discharge, and all Federal, State, and local
agencies who must be contacted in the case of a discharge as described in §112.1(b)
D Yes
UNo
DNA


HYes
DNo
DNA
D Yes
DNo
DNA
D Yes
DNo
DNA
D Yes

DNA
D Yes
DNo
DNA
O Yes
DNo
DNA

D Yes
DNo
DNA


G Yes
DNo
DNA
D Yes
DNo
DNA
DYes
DNo
DNA
GYes

DNA






Comments:
Onshore Oil Production, Drilling, & Workover Facilities
Page 5 of  14
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
INDICATE IF ITEM IS ADDRESSED ADEQUA TEL Y (Yes), INADEQUA TEL Y (No), OR IS NOT APPLICABLE (NA) IN PLAN AND FIELD.
                    REQUIREMENT SMfl
                                                 PLAN    FIELD
  112.7(a)(4) Plan includes information and procedures that enable a person reporting a discharge as described
            in§112.1(b)to relate information on the exact address or location and phone number of tie facility;
            the date and time of the discharge; the type of material discharged; estimates of the total quantity
            discharged; estimates of the quantity discharged as described in §112.1 (b); the source of the
            discharge; a description of all affected media; the cause of the discharge; any damages or injuries
            caused by the discharge; actions being used to stop, remove, and mitigate the effects of the
            discharge; whether an evacuation may be needed; and the names of individuals and/or
            organizations who have also been contacted (Not required if a facility has an FRP)

  112.7(a)(5) Plan organized so that portions describing procedures to be used when a discharge occurs will be
            readily usable in an emergency (Not required if a facility has an FRP)
                                                 D Yes
                                                 DNo
                                                 DMA
                                                 O Yes
                                                 D No
                                                 DMA
 112.7{b)   Plan includes a prediction of the direction, rate of flow, and total quantity of oil that could be
            discharged for each type of major equipment failure where experience indicates a reasonable
            potential for equipment failure
                                                 D Yes
                                                 DNo
                                                 DNA
 112.7(c>   Appropriate containment and/or diversionary structures provided to prevent a discharge as
            described in §112.1(b) before cleanup occurs. The entire containment system, including walls and
            floors, is capable of containing oil and is constructed  to prevent escape of a discharge from the
            containment system before cleanup occurs. (1) For onshore facilities, one of the following or its
            equivalent: (i) dikes, berms, or retaining walls sufficiently impervious to contain oil, (ii) curbing, (iii)
            culverting, gutters or other drainage systems, (iv) weirs, booms or other barriers, (v) spill diversion
            ponds, (vi) retention ponds, or (vii) sorbent materials (See Appendix A)

 112.7(d)     Determination(s) of impracticability of secondary containment

              If YES, is the impracticability of secondary containment clearly demonstrated?
                                                 D Yes
                                                 DNo
                                                 DNA
                                                 D Yes
                                                 DNo

                                                 DYes
                                                 DNo
                                                 DNA
              Comments concerning impracticability determination(s) for secondary containment:
              If impracticability determination is made, for bulk storage containers, periodic integrity testing of
              containers and leak testing of the valves and piping (associated with the container) is conducted

              If impracticability determination is made, unless facility has FRP:
              (1)   Contingency Plan following 40 CFR part 109 (see Appendix C) is provided AND
              (2)   Written commitment of manpower, equipment, and materials required to control and
                   remove any quantity of oil discharged that may be harmful

  112.7(e)     Inspections and tests conducted in accordance with written procedures
              Record of inspections or tests signed by supervisor or inspector and kept with Plan for at least 3
              years (see Appendix B checklist)
                                                 rj Yes
                                                 D No
                                                 DNA

                                                 DYes
                                                 DNo
                                                 DNA
                                                 DYes
                                                 O No
                                                 DNA

                                                 DYes
                                                 DNo
                                                 DNA
                                                 D Yes
                                                 DNo
                                                 DNA
 Comments:
             DYes
             DNo
             DNA
             D Yes
             a NO
             DNA
             DYes
             a NO
             DNA
             DYes
             DNo
             DNA
             D Yes
             DNo
             DNA
             D Yes
             D No
             DNA
Onshore Oil Production, Drilling, & Workover Facilities
Page 6 of  14
Version 1.0,11/28/2005


-------
INDICATE IF ITEM IS ADDRESSED ADEQUATELY (Yes), INADEQUA TELY(No), OR IS NOT APPLICABLE (NA) IN PLAN AND FIELD.
G|NERALSPCCREQUIREMEMTS--WCmil2J ;
1 12.7{f) Personnel, training, and oil discharge prevention procedures
(1 ) Training of oil-handling personnel in operation and maintenance of equipment to prevent discharges;
discharge procedure protocols; applicable pollution control laws, rules and regulations; general facility
operations; and contents of SPCC Plan
(2) Person designated as accountable for discharge prevention at the facility
(3) Discharge prevention briefings conducted at least once a year for oil handling personnel
1 12.7(h) Tank car and tank truck loading/unloading rack*
(1) Does loading/unloading area (the location adjacent to the loading or unloading rack) drainage flow
to catchment basin or treatment facility? D Yes D No
• If NO, quick drainage system used
Containment system holds capacity of the largest single compartment of a tank car/truck
loaded/unloaded at the facility
(2) Physical barriers, warning signs, wheel chocks, or vehicle brake interlock system in loading/unloading
areas (the location adjacent to the loading or unloading rack) to prevent vehicles from departing before
complete disconnection of flexible or fixed oil transfer lines
(3) Lower-most drains and all outlets on tank cars/trucks inspected prior to filling/departure, and if necessary
ensure that they are tightened, adjusted, or replaced to prevent liquid discharge while in transit
112.7(i) Brittle fracture evaluation of field-constructed aboveground containers
1 12.7(i) Brittle fracture evaluation is conducted after tank repair/alteration/change in service that might affect
the risk of a discharge or after a discharge/failure due to brittle fracture or other catastrophe and
appropriate action taken as necessary (for field-constructed aboveground containers)
1 12.7(|) State rules, regulations and guidelines and conformance with applicable sections of 40 CFR part 112
1 12,7(j) Discussion of conformance with applicable more stringent State rules, regulations, and guidelines
and other effective discharge prevention and containment procedures listed in 40 CFR part 112
PLAN
FIELD

D Yes
a NO
C1NA
D Yes
DNo
DMA
DYes
a NO
DMA

D Yes
a NO
QNA
D Yes
Q No
DMA
D Yes •
DNo
DNA
DYes
D No
DNA

DYes
DNo
D NA
D Yes
DNo
DNA
D Yes
DNo
DNA
DYes
DNo
ONA
DYes
DNo
DNA
DYes
DNo
DNA
OYes
DNo
DNA
DYes
DNo
DNA
DYes
DNo
DNA
DYes
DNo
DNA

Comments:
*Note that a tank car/truck loading/unloading rack must be present for §112. 7(h) to apply. Though this requirement applies to all
facilities, loading and unloading rack equipment is often not present at typical production facilities.
Onshore Oil Production, Drilling, & Workover Facilities
Page 7 of  14
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
INDICA TE IF ITEM IS ADDRESSED ADEQUA TEL Y (Yes), INADEQUA TEL Y (No), OR IS NOT APPLICABLE (NA) IN PLAN AND FIELD.
                                                                                                         HAN
  112.9(b) Oil production facility drainage

  (1)     At tank batteries, separation and treating areas where there is a reasonable possibility of a discharge as
         described in §112.1(b), drainage is closed and sealed except when draining uncontaminated rainwater.
         Accumulated oil on the rainwater is returned to storage or disposed of in accordance with legally
         approved methods
                                                                                                 DYes
                                                                                                 DNo
                                                                                                 DNA
         Prior to drainage, diked area inspected and action taken as provided in §112.8(c)(3)(ii), (iii).and (iv):

         •  112.8(c)(3)(ii)  Retained rainwater is inspected to ensure that its presence will not cause a discharge
           as described in §112.1(b)
           112.8(c)(3)(iii) Bypass valve opened and resealed under responsible supervision
           112.8{c)(3){iv) Adequate records of drainage are kept; for example, records required under permits
           issued in accordance with §122.41(j)(2) and (m)(3)
 (2)  Field drainage systems and oil traps, sumps, or skimmers inspected at regularly scheduled intervals for oil,
      and accumulations of oil promptly removed

 112.9(c) Oil production facility bulk storage containers
                                                                                                 DYes
                                                                                                 DNo
                                                                                                 DNA
                                                                                                 DYes
                                                                                                 ONo
                                                                                                 QNA

                                                                                                 DYes
                                                                                                 DNo
                                                                                                 DNA
                                                                                                 D Yes
                                                                                                 DNo
                                                                                                 DNA
 (1)  Containers used are compatible with material stored and conditions of storage
 (2)
Secondary containment provided for all tank battery, separation and treating facilities with capacity to
hold the largest single container and sufficient freeboard for precipitation
         Drainage from undiked areas safely confined in a catchment basin or holding pond
 (3)  Periodically and upon a regular schedule, visually inspect containers on or above the surface of the ground
      for deterioration and maintenance needs, including foundations and supports
 (4)  New and old tank batteries engineered/updated in accordance with good engineering practices to prevent
      discharges including at least one of the following: (i) adequate container capacity to prevent overfill if
      regular pumping/gauging is delayed; (ii) overflow equalizing lines between containers so that a full
      container can overflow to an adjacent container; (iii) vacuum protection to prevent container collapse; or
      (iv) high level sensors to generate and transmit an alarm to the computer where the facility is subject to a
      computer production control system

 Comments:
     DYes
     DNo
     ONA

     DYes
     DNo
     DNA
                                                                                                 DYes
                                                                                                 DNa
                                                                                                 DNA

                                                                                                 DYes
                                                                                                 DNO
                                                                                                 DNA
                                                                                                 DYes
                                                                                                 DNo
                                                                                                 DNA
              a Yes
              DNo
              DNA
              D Yes
              DNo
              DNA
              DYes
              DNo
              UNA

              DYes
              DNo
              DNA
              DYes
              DNo
              DNA
DYes
DNo
DNA

DYes
DNo
DNA
              DYes
              DNo
              DNA

              DYes
              DNo
              DNA
              DYes
              DNo
              DNA
Onshore Oil Production, Drilling, & Workover Facilities
                                               Page 8 of 14
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
INDICATE IF ITEM IS ADDRESSED ADEQUATELY (Yes), INADEQUATELY (No), ORIS NOT APPLICABLE (NA) IN PLAN AND FIELD.
 ONSHORE OIL PROpBCTION FAiEiLlTJES—112;9
                                               PLAN
 112.9(d) Facility transfer operations

 (1)   All aboveground valves and piping associated with transfer operations are inspected periodically and upon
      a regular schedule. Include the general condition of flange joints, valve glands and bodies, drip pans, pipe
      supports, pumping well palish rod stuffing boxes, bleeder and gauge valves, and other such items.
 (2)  Saltwater (oil field brine) disposal facilities inspected often to detect possible system upsets capable of
      causing a discharge, particularly following a sudden change in atmospheric temperature

 (3)  Flowline maintenance program to prevent discharges from each flowline is established
                                               DYes
                                               DNo
                                               TJNA
                                               DYes
                                               DNo
                                               DNA

                                               DYes
                                               DNo
                                               DNA
  Comments:
             DYes
             DNo
             DNA
             DYes
             DNo
             DNA

             DYes
             DNO
             DNA
  ONSHORE OJL DRIlIlNG AND WORKOVER FACiLmES-~112,10
                                               PLAN
             FIELD
  112.10(b) Mobile drilling or workover equipment is positioned or located to prevent a discharge as described in
112.10(c) Catchment basins or diversion structures are provided to intercept and contain discharges of fuel,
         crude oil, or oily drilling fluids.

            Blowout prevention (BOP) assembly and well control system installed before drilling below any
            casing string or during workover operations

            BOP assembly and well control system capable of controlling any well-head pressure that may be
            encountered while on the well

Comments:
                                               DYes
                                               DNo
                                               DNA

                                               DYes
                                               DNo
                                               DNA

                                               O Yes
                                               DNo
                                               QNA

                                               DYes
                                               DNo
                                               GNA
             DYes
             DNo
             DNA

             DYes
             DNo
             ONA

             O Yes
             Q No
             DNA
                                                                                                            D No
                                                                                                            ONA
Onshore Oil Production, Drilling, & Workover Facilities
Page 9 of 14
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
                                         ADDITION AL COMMENTS
  Rule Provision
Comment
Onshore Oil Production, Drilling, & Workover Facilities     Page 10 of 14
                              Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
  Photo Number
fo^rgjipcp*
      Description (include date and location)
Onshore Oil Production, Drilling, & Workover Facilities     Page 11 of 14
                                                   Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
                      SPCC FIELD INSPECTION AND PLAN REVIEW TABLE
    Appendix A: Documentation of Field Observations of Containers and Associated Requirements

Inspectors should use this table to document observations of containers, as needed.
Containers and Piping
Check containers for leaks, specifically looking for: drip marks, discoloration of tanks, puddles containing spilled or leaked material,
corrosion, cracks, and localized dead vegetation, and standard/specifications of construction..
Check aboveground container foundation for: cracks, discoloration, puddles containing spilled or leaked material, settling, gaps
between container and foundation, and damage caused by vegetation roots.
Check all piping for: droplets of stored material, discoloration, corrosion, bowing of pipe between supports, evidence of stored material
seepage from valves or seals, evidence of leaks from flowlines, and localized dead vegetation. For all aboveground piping, include the
general condition of flange joints, valve glands and bodies, drip pans, pipe supports, pumping well polish rod stuffing boxes, bleeder and
gauge valves, and other such items. (Document in comments section of §112.9(d)).

Secondary Containment
Check secondary containment Tor: containment system (including walls and floor) ability to contain oil such that oil will not escape the
containment system before cleanup occurs, proper sizing, cracks, discoloration, presence of spilled or leaked material (standing liquid),
erosion, corrosion, penetrations in the containment system, and valve  conditions.
Check dike or berm systems for: level of precipitation in dike/available capacity, operational status of drainage valves (closed), dike
or berm impermeability, debris, erosion, impermeability of the earthen floor/walls of diked area, and location/status of pipes, inlets,
drainage around and beneath containers,  presence of oil discharges within diked areas.
Check drainage systems for: an accumulations of oil that may have resulted from any small discharge, including field drainage
systems (such as drainage ditches or road ditches), and oil traps, sumps, or skimmers. Ensure any accumulations of oil have been
promptly removed.
Check retention and drainage ponds for: erosion, available capacity, presence of spilled or leaked material, debris, and stressed
vegetation.
   Container ID/ General Condition
Storage Capacity and
     Type of OH
Type of Containment/
  Drainage Control
Overfill Protection and
Testing & Inspections
Onshore Oil Production, Drilling, & Workover Facilities
               Page 12 of 14
                                 Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
                           SPCC INSPECTION AND TESTING CHECKLIST
                      Appendix B: Required Documentation of Tests and Inspections
Records of inspections and tests required by 40 CFR part 112 signed by the appropriate supervisor or inspector must be kept with the
SPCC Plan for a period of three years. Records of inspections and tests conducted under usual and customary business practices will
suffice. Documentation of the following inspections and tests should be kept with the SPCC Plan.
                              Inspection or Test
                                                                                  Documentation
                                                                               Present
                                          Not
                                        Present
                                                       Not
                                                    Applicable
  112.7-General SPCC Requirements

  (a)  Integrity testing is conducted for bulk storage containers with no secondary
      containment system and for which an impracticability determination has been
      made

  (d)  Integrity and leak testing of valves and piping associated with bulk storage
      containers with no secondary containment system and for which an
      impracticability determination has been made

  (i)   Evaluate field-constructed aboveground containers for potential for brittle fracture
      or other catastrophic failure when the container undergoes a repair, alteration,
      reconstruction or change in service
  112.9-Onshore oil production facilities

  (b)(1)  Rainwater released directly from diked containment areas to a storm drain or
        open watercourse inspected and records of drainage kept

  (b)(2)  Field drainage systems, oil traps, sumps, and skimmers inspected regularly for
        oil, and accumulations of oil promptly removed
 (c)(3)  Regular visual inspections of containers, foundations and supports for
        deterioration and maintenance needs
 (d)(1}  All aboveground valves and piping associated with transfer operations are
        regularly inspected

 (d)(2)  Saltwater disposal facilities inspected often to detect possible system upsets
        capable of causing a discharge

 (d)(3)  Specific and individual inspection, testing, and/or evaluation requirements as
        required  by facility's fiowline maintenance program

 Comments:
Onshore Oil Production, Drilling, & Workover Facilities
Page 13 of 14
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
                          SPCC CONTINGENCY PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST
                  Appendix C: 40 CFR Part 109-Criteria for State, Local and Regional Oil
                                           Removal Contingency Plans
 If a facility makes an impracticability determination for secondary containment in accordance with §112.7(d), it is required to provide
 an oil spill contingency plan following 40 CFR part 109.
  i09.5-Development and ImplementaUoncrfterla for State, local and regional oil removal contingency plans*    Yes
  (a) Definition of the authorities, responsibilities and duties of all persons, organizations or agencies which are to be
      involved in planning or directing oil removal operations.

  (b) Establishment of notification procedures for the purpose of early detection and timely notification of an oil
      discharge including:
      (1)   The identification of critical water use areas to facilitate the reporting of and response to oil discharges.
      (2)   A current list of names, telephone numbers and addresses of the responsible persons (with alternates) and
           organizations to be notified when an oil discharge is discovered
      (3)   Provisions for access to a reliable communications system for timely notification of an oil discharge, and
           the capability of interconnection with the communications systems established under related oil removal
           contingency plans, particularly State and National plans (e.g., NCP).
      (4)   An established, prearranged procedure for requesting assistance during a major disaster or when the
           situation exceeds the response capability of the State, local or regional authority.
  (c)  Provisions to assure that full resource capability is known and can be committed during an oil discharge situation
      including:
      (1)   The identification and inventory of applicable equipment, materials and supplies which are available locally
           and regionally.

      (2)   An estimate of the equipment, materials and supplies which would be required to remove the maximum oil
           discharge to be anticipated.

      (3)   Development of agreements and arrangements in advance of an oil discharge for the acquisition of
           equipment, materials and supplies to be used in responding to such a  discharge.
  (d) Provisions for well defined and specific actions to be taken after discovery and notification of an oil discharge
      including:

      (1)   Specification of an oil discharge response operating team consisting of trained, prepared and available
           operating personnel.
      (2)   Predesignation of a properly qualified oil discharge response coordinator who is charged with the
           responsibility and delegated commensurate authority for directing and coordinating response operations
           and who knows how to request assistance from Federal authorities operating under existing national and
           regional contingency plans.

      (3)   A preplanned location for an oil discharge response operations center and a reliable communications
           system for directing the coordinated overall response operations.

      (4)   Provisions for varying degrees of response effort depending on the severity of the oil discharge.
      (5)   Specification of the order of priority in which the various water uses are to be protected where more than
           one water use may be adversely affected as a result of an oil discharge and where response operations
           may not be adequate to protect all uses.

  (e) Specific and well defined procedures to facilitate recovery of damages and enforcement measures as provided
      for by State and local statutes and ordinances.	
                No
 * The contingency plan should be consistent with all applicable state and local plans, Area Contingency Plans, and the National
 Contingency Plan (NCP).
Onshore Oil Production, Drilling, & Workover Facilities     Page 14 of 14
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
                       U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                SPCC FIELD INSPECTION AND PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST
                  FOR USE AT OFFSHORE DRILLING, PRODUCTION, AND WORKOVER FACILITIES
Overview of the Checklist

This checklist is designed to assist EPA inspectors in conducting a thorough and consistent
inspection of a facility's compliance with the Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure
(SPCC) rule at 40 CFR part 112. It is a tool to help federal inspectors (or their contractors)
record observations during the site visit and review of the SPCC Plan.  While the checklist is
comprehensive, the inspector should always refer to the SPCC rule in its entirety, the SPCC
Regional Inspector Guidance Document, and other relevant guidance for evaluating
compliance.  This checklist must be completed in order for an inspection to count toward an
agency measure (i.e., OEM/OECA inspection measures or GPRA).

The checklist is organized according to the SPCC rule. Each item in the checklist identifies the
relevant section and paragraph in 40 CFR part 112 where that requirement is stated.
Sections 112.1 through 112.5 specify the applicability of the rule and requirements for the
preparation, implementation, and amendment of SPCC Plans. For these sections, the checklist
includes data fields to be completed, as well as several questions with "yes" or "no" answers.

Sections 112.7 through 112.11 specify requirements for spill prevention, control, and
countermeasures.  For these sections, the inspector needs to evaluate whether the requirement
is addressed adequately or inadequately in the SPCC  Plan and whether it is implemented
adequately in the field (either by field observation or record review). For the SPCC Plan and
implementation in the field, if a requirement is addressed adequately, mark the "Yes" box in the
appropriate column. If a requirement is not addressed  adequately, mark the "No" box. If a
requirement does not apply to the particular facility, mark the "NA" box. If a provision of the rule
applies only to the SPCC Plan, the "Field" column is shaded.

Space is provided in each section to record comments. Additional space is available on the
comments page at the end of the checklist. Comments should remain factual and support the
evaluation of compliance.

Appendix A is for recording information about containers and other locations at the facility that
require secondary containment.

Appendix B is a checklist for documentation of the tests and inspections the facility operator is
required to keep with the SPCC Plan.

Appendix C is a checklist for oil removal contingency plans. A contingency plan is required if a
facility determines that secondary containment is impracticable as provided  in 40 CFR 112.7(d).
OFFSHORE FACILITIES
Page 1 of 14
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
                            U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                      SPCC FIELD INSPECTION AND PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST
                       FOR USE AT OFFSHORE DRILLING, PRODUCTION, AND WORKOVER FACILITIES
 FACILITY NAME:
 ADDRESS:

 CITY:
STATE:
ZIP:
                 LAT:

                 COUNTY:
                                            LONG:
 TELEPHONE:
FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE NAME:
 OWNER NAME:
 OWNER ADDRESS:

 CITY:
STATE:
ZIP:
 TELEPHONE:
OWNER CONTACT PERSON:
 FACILITY OPERATOR NAME (IF DIFFERENT FROM OWNER - IF NOT. PRINT "SAME"):
 OPERATOR ADDRESS:

 CITY:

 TELEPHONE:
STATE:
ZIP:
OPERATOR CONTACT PERSON:
 FACILITY TYPE:

 HOURS PER DAY FACILITY ATTENDED:
                              NAICS CODE:

             TOTAL FACILITY CAPACITY:
 TYPE(S) OF OIL STORED:

 IS FACILITY LOCATED IN INDIAN COUNTRY? Q YES  D NO IF YES, RESERVATION NAME:
 JNSPECTrON INFORMATION
 INSPECTION DATE:

 LEAD INSPECTOR:
 TIME:
          INSPECTION NUMBER:
 OTHER INSPECTOR(S):
 / performed an SPCC inspection et the facility specified above.
 INSPECTOR SIGNATURE:
                                        DATE:
OFFSHORE FACILITIES
          Page 2 of 14
                               Version 1.0.11/28/2005

-------
 IS THE FACILITY REGULATED UNDER 40 CFR part 112?
 The completely buried oil storage capacity is over 42,000 gallons, OR the aggregate aboveground oil storage capacity is over 1,320
 gallons                                                                                    D Yes  O No AND
 The facility is a non-transportation-related facility engaged in drilling, producing, gathering, storing, processing, refining, transferring,
 distributing, using, or consuming oil and oil products, which due to its location could reasonably be expected to discharge oil into or
 upon the navigable waters of the United States (as defined in 40 CFR 110.1),                       D Yes  D No
 AFFECTED WATERWAY(S):

 PATH:
                                                                         DISTANCE:
  Note: The fallowing storage capacity is not considered in determining applicability of SPCC requirements:
  •   Completely buried tanks subject to all the technical requirements of 40 CFR part 280 or a state program approved under 40 CFR part 281.
  •   Equipment subject to the authority of the U.S. Department of Transportation, U.S. Department ofthe Interior, or Minerals Management Service,
     as defined in Memoranda of Understanding dated November 24, 1971, and November 8, 1993.
  '   Any facility or part thereof used exclusively for wastewater treatment (production, recovery or recycling of oil is not considered wastewater
     treatment).
     Containers smaller than 55 gallons.
     Permanently closed containers.
  Does the facility have an SPCC Plan?

  Comments:
                                                                               QYes DNo
  REQUIREMENTS FOR PREPARATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF A SPGC PLAN-^40GFR 112.3
  Date facility began operations:
  Date of initial SPCC Plan preparation:

  112.3(a)     For facilities in operation prior to August 16, 2002:
                Plan amended by February 17, 2006

                Amended Plan implemented by August 18, 2006
                                                    Current plan version (date/number):
                                                                               D Yes D No  D NA

                                                                               DYes DNo  D NA
             For facilities beginning operation between August 17, 2002, and August 18,
             2006, Plan prepared and fully implemented by August 18, 2006
                                                                               D Yes D No  D NA
  112.3(b)
  &(c)
For facilities beginning operation after August 18, 2006, Plan prepared and fully
implemented before beginning operations
                      D Yes  D No  D NA
  112.3(d)  Professional Engineer certification includes statement that the PE attests:
     •  PE is familiar with the requirements of 40 CFR part 112
     •  PE or agent has visited and examined the facility
     *  Plan is prepared in accordance with good engineering practice including consideration of
        applicable Industry standards and the requirements of 40 CFR part 112
     •  Procedures for required inspections and testing have been established
     •  Plan is adequate for the facility
  PE Name:
                             License No.:
State:
      DYes  DNo
      DYes  DNo

      DYes  DNo
      DYes  DNo
      DYes  DNo

Date of certification:
  112.3(e)   Plan available onsite if facility is attended at least 4 hours/day
            (If located at nearest field office, please note contact information below.)
                                                                               D Yes D No  D NA
  Comments:
OFFSHORE FACILITIES
                                          Page 3 of 14
                            Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
                                                                                                                             1
  112 4(a)   Has the facility discharged a reportable quantity of oil in amounts considered harmful: more
           than 1,000 gallons of oil in a single discharge or more than 42 gallons in each of two
           discharges in any 12-month period (see 40 CFR part 110)7
                                                                                  DYes DNo
            •  If yes, was information submitted to the RA as required in §112.4(a)?

            •  Date(s) of reportable discharge(s):
            •  Were they reported to the NRC?

 112.4(d), (e) Have changes required by the RA been implemented in the Plan and/or facility?
                                                                                  DYes DNo D NA


                                                                                  DYes DNo DMA

                                                                                  DYes DNo D NA
 Comments:
                                BY THE OWNER 6R OPBRATQRMO SFR 112,5
 112.5(a)    Has there been a change at the facility that materially affects the potential for a discharge?
                                                                                  DYes DNo  D NA
 112.5(b)
•  If so, was the Plan amended within six months of Ihe change?

Review and evaluation of the Plan documented at least once every 5 years?
                           D Yes D No D NA

                           DYes DNo D NA
              Following Plan review, and if amendment was required, was Plan amended within six
              months to include more effective prevention and control technology, if available?
                                                                                  DYes DNo  D NA
 112.5(c)   Professional Engineer certification of any technical Plan amendments in accordance with
           §112.3(d)
                                                                                  DYes D No DNA
 Name:
                                    I
                          License No.:
State:
Date of certification:
 Reason for amendment:

 Amendments implemented within six months of any Plan amendment
                                                                                  DYes DNo  D NA
 Comments:
OFFSHORE FACILITIES
                                        Page 4 of 14
                           Version 1.0. 11/28/2005

-------
INDICATE IF ITEM IS ADDRESSED ADEQUATEL Y (Yes), INADEQUA TEL Y (No), OR IS NOT APPLICABLE (NA) IN PLAN AND FIELD.
^|NER|kSPS£ RECiiREM|NTS^40 CFR 112.7
'•WMB
FIEtD
Management approval at a level of authority to commit the necessary resources to fully implement the Plan D Yes D No
Name: Titie:
Plan follows sequence of the rule or provides a cross-reference of requirements in the Plan and the rule

If Plan calls for facilities, procedures, methods, or equipment not yet fully operational, details of their installation
and start-up are discussed (Note: Relevant for inspection evaluation and testing baselines.)
1 1 2.7(a)(2) If there are deviations from the requirements of the rule, the Plan states reasons for
nonconformance
Alternative measures described in detail and provide equivalent environmental protection (Note:
Inspector should document if the environmental equivalence is implemented in the field.)
Date:
DYes
DNo
D Yes
DNo
DNA
D Yes
D No
DNA
DYes
DNo
DNA



-


DYes
UNO
DNA
Describe each deviation and reasons for nonconformance:
1 12,7(a)(3) Plan includes diagram with location and contents of all regulated containers (including completely

buried tanks otherwise exempt from the SPCC requirements), transfer stations, and connecting
pipes
1 12.7(a)(3) Plan addresses each of the following:
(i) For each container, type of oil and storage capacity (see Appendix A)


(ii) Discharge prevention measures, including procedures for routine handling of products


(iii) Discharge or drainage controls, such as secondary containment around containers, and other

structures, equipment, and procedures for the control of a discharge
(iv) Countermeasures for discharge discovery, response, and cleanup (both facility's and contractor's
resources)
(v) Methods of disposal of recovered materials in accordance with applicable legal requirements


(vi> Contact list and phone numbers for the facility response coordinator, National Response Center,
cleanup contractors contracted to respond to a discharge, and all Federal, State, and local agencies
who must be contacted in the case of a discharge as described in §11 2.1 (b)
D Yes

ONA


O Yes
ONo
ONA
D Yes
DNo
PNA
DYes

DNA
DYes
DNo
DNA
DYes
DNo
DNA
D Yes
DNo
DNA

DYes

DNA


DYes
DNo
DNA
U Yes
nNo
DNA
DYes

DNA
O Yes
DNA






Comments:
OFFSHORE FACILITIES
Page 5 of 14
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
INDICATE IF ITEM IS ADDRESSED ADEQUATELY (Yes), INADEQUATELY (No), OR IS NOT APPLICABLE (NA) IN PLAN AND FIELD.
SENEGAL
                    REQUIREMENTS— 40 CFR 1 12.7
    PLAN   FIELD
  112.7(a)(4) Plan includes information and procedures that enable a person reporting a discharge as described
            in §112.1(b)to relate information on the exact address or location and phone number of the facility;
            the date and time of the discharge; the type of material discharged; estimates of the total quantity
            discharged; estimates of the quantity discharged as described in §112.1(b); the source of the
            discharge; a description of all affected media; the cause of the discharge; any damages or injuries
            caused by the discharge; actions being used to stop, remove, and mitigate the effects of the
            discharge; whether an evacuation may be needed; and the names of individuals and/or
            organizations who have also been contacted

  112.7(a)(5) Plan organized so that portions describing procedures to be used when a discharge occurs will be
            readily usable in an emergency
                                                                                                    D Yes
                                                                                                    DNo
                                                                                                    DMA
                                                                                                    DYes
                                                                                                    ONo
                                                                                                    DNA
  112.7(b)   Plan includes a prediction of the direction, rate of flow, and total quantity of oil that could be
            discharged for each type of major equipment failure where experience indicates a reasonable
            potential for equipment failure
                                                                                                    DYes
                                                                                                    O No
                                                                                                    ONA
 112.7(c)    Appropriate containment and/or diversionary structures provided to prevent a discharge as
            described in §112.1 (b) before cleanup occurs. The entire containment system, including walls and
            floors, is capable of containing oil and is constructed to prevent escape of a discharge from the
            containment system before a cleanup occurs.... (2) For offshore facilities: (i) curbing or drip pans,
            or (ii) sumps and collection systems (See Appendix A)

 112.7(d)      Determination(s) of impracticability of secondary containment

              If YES, is the impracticability of secondary containment clearly demonstrated?
                                                                                                    DYes
                                                                                                    DNo
                                                                                                    DNA
                                                                                                    D Yes
                                                                                                    DNo

                                                                                                    D Yes
                                                                                                    DNO
                                                                                                    DNA
             DYes
             DNo
             DNA
             DYes
             DNo
             DNA
             Comments concerning impracticability determination(s) for secondary containment:
             If impracticability determination is made, for bulk storage containers, periodic integrity testing of
             containers and leak testing of the valves and piping associated with the container is conducted
             If impracticability determination is made:
             (1)   Contingency Plan following 40 CFR part 109 (see Appendix C) is provided AND

             (2)   Written commitment of manpower, equipment, and materials required to control and remove
                   any quantity of oil discharged that may be harmful

 112.7(e)    Inspections and tests conducted in accordance with written procedures
             Record of inspections or tests signed by supervisor or inspector and kept with Plan for at least 3
             years (see Appendix B checklist)
                                                                                                    D Yes
                                                                                                    DNo
                                                                                                    DNA
                                                                                                    DYes
                                                                                                    DNO
                                                                                                    DNA

                                                                                                    DYes
                                                                                                    DNo
                                                                                                    DNA

                                                                                                    DYes
                                                                                                    DNo
                                                                                                    DNA
                                                                                                    DYes
                                                                                                    GNo
                                                                                                    DNA
             DYes
             DNo
             DNA
             DYes
             DNo
             DNA
             OYes
             DNo
             DNA
 Comments:
OFFSHORE FACILITIES
                                                    Page 6 of 14
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
INDICATE IF ITEM IS ADDRESSED ADEQUA TELY(Yes), INADEQUA TEL Y (No), OR IS NOT APPLICABLE (NA) IN PLAN AND FIELD.
 GENERAL SPCC REQUIREMENTS—40 CFR 112.7
                                                                                                     PLAN
             FIELD
 112,7$) Personnel, training and oii discharge prevention procedures

 (1)    Training of oil-handling personnel in operation and maintenance of equipment to prevent discharges;
       discharge procedure protocols; applicable pollution control laws, rules and regulations; general facility
       operations; and contents of SPCC Plan
  (2)   Person designated as accountable for discharge prevention at the facility
  (3)   Discharge prevention briefings conducted at least once a year for oil handling personnel
                                                                                                     DYes
                                                                                                     DNo
                                                                                                     DNA
                                                                                                     QYes
                                                                                                     O No
                                                                                                     UNA

                                                                                                     D Yes
                                                                                                     DNo
                                                                                                     DNA
  112:7/{h) Tank car and :tenk truck Wading/unloading rack*
  (D
        Does loading/unloading area (the location adjacent to the loading or unloading rack) drainage flow to
        catchment basin or treatment facility?  D Yes  D No
             •  If NO, quick drainage system used

        Containment system holds capacity of the largest single compartment of a tank car/truck
        loaded/unloaded at the facility

(2)    Physical barriers, warning signs, wheel chocks, or vehicle  brake interlock system in loading/unloading
      areas (the location adjacent to the loading or unloading  rack) to prevent vehicles from departing before
      complete disconnection of flexible or fixed oil transfer lines

(3)    Lower-most drains and all outlets on tank cars/trucks inspected prior to filling/departure, and if necessary
      ensure that they are tightened, adjusted, or replaced to  prevent liquid discharge while in transit
    DYes
    DNo
    DNA
                                                                                                       DYes
                                                                                                       DNo
                                                                                                       DNA

                                                                                                       P Yes
                                                                                                       DNo
                                                                                                       DNA
                                                                                                       OYes
                                                                                                       UNO
                                                                                                       DNA
             DYes
             a NO
             DNA
             DYes
             DNo
             DNA

             DYes
             Q No
             ONA
DYes
DNo
DNA
             DYes
             DNa
             DNA

             DYes
             a NO
             DNA
             DYes
             DNo
             DNA
         ::Brtftefracture:evaluati^^                                           :       .-=  -      :
  112.7{i)  Brittle fracture evaluation is conducted after tank repair/a Iteration/change in service that might affect
          the risk of a discharge or after a discharge/failure due to brittle fracture or other catastrophe, and
          appropriate action taken as necessary (for field-constructed aboveground containers)

  112:70)  State rules, regulations and guidelines and eonformartce with applicable sections of 40 CFR part 112
  112.7(j)  Discussion of conformance with applicable more stringent State rules, regulations, and guidelines and
          other effective discharge prevention and containment procedures listed in 40 CFR part 112

  Comments:
                                                                                                     DYes
                                                                                                     DNo
                                                                                                     QNA
                                                                                                     DYes
                                                                                                     DNo
                                                                                                     DNA
             DYes
             DNo
             DNA
  * Note that a tank car/truck loading/unloading rack must be present for §112.7(h) to apply. Though this requirement applies to all
  facilities, loading and unloading rack equipment is often not present at typical offshore production facilities.	
OFFSHORE FACILITIES
                                                    Page 7 of 14
Versionl.0,11/28/2005

-------
INDICATE IF ITEM IS ADDRESSED ADEQUA TEL Y (Yes). INADEQUA TEL Y (No), OR IS NOT APPLICABLE (NA) IN PLAN AND FIELD.
                            ; ffiOpyCjlON, JPIR W0R1QYER FftCILITIES-H 12.11
 112.11(b)   Oil drainage collection equipment used to prevent and control small discharges around pumps,
             glands, valves, flanges, expansion joints, hoses, drain lines, separators, treatsrs, tanks, and
             associated equipment

             Facility drains are controlled and directed toward a central collection sump to prevent a discharge
             as described in §112.1(b); if drains and sumps not practicable, oil in collection equipment removed
             as often as necessary to prevent overflow

 112.11 (c)   For facilities using a sump system, sump and drains adequately sized
             For facilities using a sump system, spare pump available to remove liquids and assure that oil does
             not escape

             Regularly scheduled preventive maintenance inspection and testing program to assure reliable
             operation of liquid removal system and pump start-up device
             Redundant automatic sump pumps and control devices are installed if necessary
 112.11{d)  If separators and treaters are equipped with dump valves which predominantly fail in the closed
            position and where pollution risk is high, facility equipped to prevent discharges by (1) extending the
            flare line to a diked area if the separator is near shore, (2) equipping separator with high liquid level
            sensor to automatically shut in wells producing to the separator, OR (3) installing parallel redundant
            dump valves

 112.11(e)  Atmospheric storage or surge containers equipped with high liquid level sensing devices that activate
            an alarm or control the flow, or otherwise prevent discharges
                                                 PLAN
                                                 D Yes
                                                 DNo
                                                 DNA


                                                 DYes
                                                 DNo
                                                 DNA


                                                 DYes
                                                 DNo
                                                 DMA
                                                 D Yes
                                                 DNo
                                                 DNA

                                                 O Yes
                                                 DNo
                                                 DNA
                                                 DYes
                                                 DNo
                                                 DNA

                                                 DYes
                                                 DNo
                                                 DNA
                                                 OYes
                                                 DNo
                                                 UNA
 Comments:
             FIELD
             DYes
             DNo
             DNA


             DYes
             DNo
             DNA


             DYes
             DNo
             DMA
             DYes
             DNo
             DNA

             DYes
             DNo
             DNA
             DYes
             DNo
             DNA

             DYes
             DNo
             DNA
             DYes
             DNo
             ONA
OFFSHORE FACILITIES
Page 8 of 14
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
INDICATE IF ITEM IS ADDRESSED ADEQUATELY (Yes), INADEQUATELY (No), OR IS NOT APPLICABLE (NA) IN PLAN AND FIELD.

112.11(f)

112.1 1(g)



112.11(h)

112.11(i)



112.110)



112.11(k)



112.11(1)


112.1 1(m)


112.11(n)

112.11(o)

112.11(p)

Comments
poi|iDRi|uhi|,>ft$by^ : : 4!';.- :"if :': • • 3
Pressure containers equipped with high and low pressure sensing devices that activate an alarm or
control the flow
Containers equipped with suitable corrosion protection



Written procedures maintained in the SPCC plan for inspecting and testing pollution prevention
equipment and systems
Testing and inspection of pollution prevention equipment and systems conducted on a scheduled
periodic basis commensurate with the complexity, conditions, and circumstances of the facility and any
other applicable regulations. Simulated discharges are used for testing and inspecting human and
equipment pollution control and countermeasure systems
Detailed records are provided that describe surface and subsurface well shut-in valves and devices in
use at the facility for each well. Records are sufficient to determine the method of activation or control,
such as pressure differential, change in fluid or flow conditions, combination of pressure and flow, or
manual or remote control mechanisms
Blowout prevention (BOP) assembly and well control system installed before drilling below any
casing string and during workover operations
BOP assembly and well control system capable of controlling any well-head pressure that may be
encountered while on the well
Manifolds (headers) equipped with check valves on individual flowlines


If the shut-in well pressure is greater than the working pressure of the flowline and manifold valves up
to and including the header valves, flowlines are equipped with a high pressure sensing device and
shut-in valve at the wellhead, OR pressure relief system provided for flowlines
Piping appurtenant to the facility is protected from corrosion, such as with protective coatings or
cathodic protection
Sub-marine piping appurtenant to the facility is protected against environmental stresses and other
activities such as fishing operations
Sub-marine piping maintained in good operating condition at all times. Piping periodically inspected or
tested on a regular schedule for failures. Documentation of inspections or tests kept at facility.

:P|AN-
DYes
DNo
DNA
DYes
DNo
DNA

DYes
DNo
DNA
DYes
DNo
DNA


DYes
DNo
DNA


DYes
DNo
DNA
DYes
DNo
DNA
DYes
DNo
DNA
D Yes
DNo
DNA

DYes
DNo
DNA
DYes
DNo
DNA
DYes
Q No
DNA

:|feL0;;
DYes
a NO
DNA
DYes
D No
DNA
.:•:.: :.; . • V ,
:;•;::?:.: ;:•' '.• '.•
SK K
DYes
QNo
DNA






D Yes
D No
DNA
DYes
DNo
DNA
DYes
DNo
DNA
DYes
DNo
DNA

DYes
DNo
DNA
D Yes
DNo
DNA
UYes
DNo
DNA

OFFSHORE FACILITIES
Page 9 of 14
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
                                                                                                            I
                                      ADDITIONAL. COMMENTS
  Rule Provision
         Comment
OFFSHORE FACILITIES
Page 10 of 14
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
                                    PHOTO DOCUMENTATION LOG
  Photo Number
Description (Include date and location}
OFFSHORE FACILITIES
   Page 11 of 14
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
                     SPCC FIELD INSPECTION AND PLAN REVIEW TABLE
   Appendix A: Documentation of Field Observations for Containers and Associated Requirements

Inspectors should use this table to document observations of containers, as needed.
Containers
Check containers tor the following: (1} atmospheric storage or surge containers are equipped with high liquid level sensing devices
that activate an alarm or control the flow or otherwise prevent discharges (2) pressure containers are equipped with high and low
pressure sensing devices that activate an alarm or control the flow (3) containers are equipped with suitable corrosion protection.
Check piping for: droplets of stored material, discoloration, corrosion, bowing of pipe between supports, evidence of stored material
seepage from valves or seals, and localized dead vegetation.

Secondary Containment
Check secondary containment for: containment system (including walls and floor) ability to contain oil such that oil will not escape the
containment system before cleanup occurs, cracks, discoloration, presence of spilled or leaked material (standing liquid), corrosion, and
valve conditions.
Container ID/General Condition Storage Capacity and
TypeofOJI











Type of Containment/ Overfill Protection and
Drainage Control Testing A taspactlons











OFFSHORE FACILITIES
Page12of 14
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------
                           SPCC INSPECTION AND TESTING CHECKLIST
                      Appendix B: Required Documentation of Tests and Inspections
Records of inspections and tests required by 40 CFR part 112 signed by the appropriate supervisor or inspector must be kept with the
SPCC Plan for a period of three years. Records of inspections and tests conducted under usual and customary business practices will
suffice. Documentation of the following inspections and tests should be kept with the SPCC Plan.
                              Inspection or Test
                                                                                Documentation
                                                                              Present
                                         Not
                                       Present
           Not
        Appiteabie
  112.7-General SPCC Requirements
 (d)  Integrity testing is conducted for bulk storage containers with no secondary
      containment system and for which an impracticability determination has been
      made

 (d)  Integrity and leak testing of valves and piping associated with bulk storage
      containers with no secondary containment system and for which an
      impracticability determination has been made

 (i)   Evaluate field-constructed aboveground containers for potential for brittle fracture
      or other catastrophic failure when the container undergoes  a repair, alteration,
      reconstruction or change in service
  112.1 iHDffshore oil drilling; prc^<^oh:ahdwbrfa>ver facilities      ;  :  ;;  ;;    ••   ;;   :;:;

  (c)  Regularly scheduled preventive maintenance inspection and testing program to
      assure reliable operation of liquid removal system and pump start-up device
 (i)   Testing and inspection of pollution prevention equipment and systems performed
      on a scheduled periodic basis. Simulated discharges are used for testing and
      inspecting human and equipment pollution control and countermeasure systems

 (p)  Submarine piping periodically inspected or tested for failures.
 Comments:
OFFSHORE FACILITIES
Page 13 of 14
Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
                         SPCC CONTINGENCY PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST
                 Appendix C: 40 CFR Part 109-Criteria for State, Local and Regional Oil
                                          Removal Contingency Plans
If a facility makes an impracticability determination for secondary containment in accordance with §112.7(d), it is required to provide
an oil spill contingency plan following 40 CFR part 109.
 109,4-Davelopm«nt and Implementation criteria for State, local and regional oil removal contingency plans*    Yes
                                                                                                                 No
 (a) Definition of the authorities, responsibilities and duties of all persons, organizations or agencies which are to be
     involved in planning or directing oil removal operations.
 (b) Establishment of notification procedures for the purpose of early detection and timely notification of an oil
     discharge including:
     (1)   The identification of critical water use areas to facilitate the reporting of and response to oil discharges.

     (2)   A current list of names, telephone numbers and addresses of the responsible persons (with alternates) and
          organizations to be notified when an oil discharge is discovered.
     (3)   Provisions for access to a reliable communications system for timely notification of an oil discharge, and
          the capability of interconnection with the communications systems established under related oil removal
          contingency plans, particularly State and National plans (e.g., NCP).

     (4)   An established, prearranged procedure for requesting assistance during a major disaster or when the
          situation exceeds the response capability of the State, local or regional authority.

 (c)  Provisions to assure that full resource capability is known and can be committed during an oil discharge situation
     including:
     (1)   The identification and inventory of applicable equipment, materials and supplies which are available locally
          and regionally.
     (2)   An estimate of the equipment, materials and supplies which would be required to remove the maximum oil
          discharge to be anticipated.
     (3)   Development of agreements and arrangements in advance of an oil discharge for the acquisition of
          equipment, materials and supplies to be used in responding to such a discharge.

 (d) Provisions for well defined and specific actions to be taken after discovery and notification of an oil discharge
     including:

     (1)   Specification of an oil discharge response operating team consisting of trained, prepared and available
          operating personnel.

     (2)   Predesignation of a properly qualified oil discharge response coordinator who is charged with the
          responsibility and delegated commensurate authority for directing and coordinating response operations
          and who knows how to request assistance from Federal authorities operating under existing national and
          regional contingency plans.
     (3)   A preplanned location for an oil discharge response operations center and a reliable communications
          system for directing the coordinated overall response operations.
     (4)   Provisions for varying degrees of response effort depending on the severity of the oil discharge.

     (5)   Specification of the order of priority in which the various water uses are to be protected where more than
          one water use may be adversely affected as a result of an oil discharge and where response operations
          may not be adequate to protect all uses.

 (e) Specific and well defined procedures to facilitate recovery of damages and enforcement measures as provided
     for by State and local statutes and ordinances.	
'The contingency plan should be consistent with all applicable state and local plans, Area Contingency Plans, and the National
Contingency Plan (NCP).
                                                   Page 14 of  14                               Version 1.0,11 /28/2005
OFFSHORE FACILITIES

-------
Melissa Young, Esq.
Government Affairs Counsel
Petroleum Marketers Association of America
1901 N. Fort Meyer Drive
Suite 1200
Arlington, Virginia 22209-1604

Dear Ms. Young:

      Thank you for your letter to Administrator Whitman of February 5, 2001, which she
has referred to me for an answer.

      You explained that a marketer was notified by an Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) inspector that her facility, which is below the 42,000 gallon underground storage
tank threshold capacity, would need a Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure
(SPCC) Plan, because she parks her 2,500 gallon cargo tank motor vehicle at the facility
in the evenings. You noted that it is used to deliver petroleum products in commerce, not
as a mobile fueling facility and that it is emptied before it is parked for the evening.

      EPA presumes that a cargo tank motor vehicle that contains no oil, other than any
residual oil present in an emptied vehicle when it is parked at the facility in the evening, is
a highway vehicle used for the transport of oil in interstate or intrastate commerce, and is
therefore transportation-related, and not subject to SPCC jurisdiction. 40 CFR 112,
Appendix A, Section II(2)(D).  You should be aware, however, if the vehicle were to be
used at any time in a fixed operating non-transportation mode, such as the storage or
transfer of oil in any amount, other than any residual oil present in an emptied vehicle at the
end of the day, then it would become subject to the SPCC rule if there were a reasonable
possibility  of discharge from the vehicle to navigable waters or adjoining shorelines. See
40 CFR 112.3(c); and 40 CFR 112, Appendix A, Section 11(1 )(F).

      To determine if a fixed operating non-transportation mode has begun, and therefore
EPA SPCC jurisdiction arises, an EPA inspector would will look at all the circumstances at
a particular facility. Here, such circumstances might include whether the vehicle is
functioning as a storage tank, supplementing storage capacity or transferring oil at the
facility. We believe the vehicle you described is operating in a transportation-related

-------
mode, and therefore, no EPA SPCC regulatory jurisdiction arises. We note that if the
vehicle itself were to be subject to the SPCC rule, it exceeds the SPCC regulatory
threshold regardless of any other storage or use of oil at the facility.  We also note that if it
is used for the transport of oil exclusively within the confines of a facility and is not intended
to transport oil in interstate or intrastate commerce, it may be subject to the SPCC rule. 40
CFR 112, Appendix A, Section 11(1 ){J).

      Again, thank you for your letter. Please do not hesitate to contact us again
if you have other questions concerning EPA's oil program.  If you have any questions about
this letter, please contact Hugo Fleischman at 703-603-8769 or Mark Howard at 703-603-
8715.
                          Sincerely,
                          Stephen F. Heare, Acting Deputy Director,
                          Office of Emergency and Remedial Response
cc: Clifford J. Harvison, NTTC
  James Malcolm, MC 2131
  Susan Gorsky, DOT

-------
Daniel Gilligan, President
Petroleum Marketers Association of America
1901 N. Fort Myer Drive- Suite 500
Arlington, VA 22209-1604

Dear Mr. Gilligan:

       This letter is in response to your request for the Agency's view regarding whether several
approaches under consideration by your members would satisfy 40 CFR § 112.7(a)(2)'s
"equivalent environmental protection" provision and for clarification of the scope of the
requirements in 40 CFR §112.7(h)(entitled "Facility tank car and tank truck loading/unloading
rack (excluding offshore facilities)").  We discuss each of your proposals and questions below.
Please note that the guidance provided in this letter is based on generalized assumptions and may
not be applicable  in a particular case based on site-specific circumstances.

"Equivalent Environmental Protection"

       Integrity Testing

       The newly amended SPCC provisions regarding bulk storage container integrity require,
among other things, that each aboveground container be tested for integrity "on a regular
schedule."  40 CFR § 112.8(c)(6). These regulations further provide that "you must combine
visual inspection with another testing technique such as hydrostatic testing, radiographic testing,
ultrasonic testing, acoustic emissions  testing, or another system of non-destructive shell testing."
As you know, however, the regulations also allow deviations from this requirement where "you
provide equivalent environmental protection by some other means of spill prevention, control, or
countermeasure." 40 CFR §112.7(a)(2). You have  asked whether, for shop-built containers,
visual inspection plus certain actions to ensure that the containers are not in contact with the soil
would likely be considered to provide "equivalent environmental protection" to visual inspection
plus another form of testing.

       It is our view that for well-designed shop-built containers with a shell capacity of 30,000
gallons or under, combining appropriate visual inspection with the measures described below
would generally provide environmental protection equivalent to that provided by visual
inspection plus another form of testing. Specifically, the  Agency generally believes that visual
inspection plus elevation of a shop-built container in a manner that decreases corrosion potential

-------
(as compared to a container in contact with soil)1 and makes all sides of the container, including
the bottom, visible during inspection (e.g., where the containers are mounted on structural
supports, saddles, or some forms of grillage) would be considered "equivalent."  In a similar
vein, we'd also generally believe an approach that combines visual inspection with placement of
a barrier between the container and the ground, designed and operated in a way that ensures that
any leaks are immediately detected, to be considered "equivalent." For example, we believe it
would generally provide equivalent environmental protection to place a shop-built container on
an adequately designed, maintained, and inspected synthetic liner.2 We believe these approaches
would generally provide equivalent environmental protection when used for shop-built
containers (which generally have a lower failure potential than field-erected containers), because
these approaches generally reduce corrosion potential and ensure detection of any container
failure before it becomes  significant.

       In determining the appropriate SPCC plan requirements for visual inspection of
containers managed as described above, we suggest that the professional engineer (PE)  begin by
consulting appropriate industry standards, such as those listed in Steel Tank Institute  Standard
SP001 and American Petroleum Institute Standard 653.3 Similarly, in assessing whether a shop-
built container is well designed, the PE may wish to consult industry standards such as
Underwriters Laboratory  142 or American Petroleum Institute Standard 650, Appendix J. Where
a facility is considering the use of the above approaches for containers that are currently resting
on the ground, or have otherwise been managed in a way that presents risks for corrosion or are
showing signs of corrosion, we recommend the facility first evaluate the condition of the
       'Additionally, we recommend that special attention be paid to the characteristics of the
material used for the support structure to ensure that they do not actually accelerate corrosion.

       2Note, however, that a facility may not rely solely on measures that are required by other
sections of the rule (e.g., secondary containment) to provide "equivalent environmental
protection." Otherwise, the deviation provision would allow for approaches that provide a lesser
degree of protection overall.

       3Note that the Agency intends in the near future to develop guidance on appropriate visual
inspection of shop-built containers.  In that guidance, we intend to address issues such as
inspection frequency, scope (e.g., internal and /or external), training and/or qualifications  of
persons conducting the inspections, and other measures that may be appropriate at a given site
(e.g., measures to detect the presence of water in a container). We expect to use the referenced
industry standards in developing such guidance.

       It is also important to note, however, that depending on site circumstances, the
appropriate requirements for visual inspection may exceed those normally conducted in
accordance with recognized industry standards.

-------
container in accordance with good engineering practices, including seeking expert advice, where
appropriate.

       Security

       The SPCC regulations state that you must "fully fence each facility handling, processing,
or storing oil, and lock and/or guard entrance gates when the facility is not in production or is
unattended."  40 CFR § 112.7(g)(l).  You have asked whether two specific sets of circumstances
would likely be determined to provide "equivalent environmental protection" to this requirement.
The first is where the area of the facility directly involved in the handling, processing and storage
of oil is adequately fenced. The second is where the facility is equipped with a "pump house" or
"pump shack," which contains, among other appropriate things, a master disconnect switch from
which all power to pumps and containers is cut off when the facility is unattended.

       With respect to your first scenario, it is our view that, as a general matter, adequately
fencing all discrete areas directly involved  in the handling, processing and storage of oil would
provide equivalent environmental protection to fencing the entire footprint of the facility, since it
is potential for harm to this equipment that poses the risk addressed by the fencing requirement.

       With respect to the second scenario, the approach you suggest would appear to generally
provide environmental protection equivalent to fencing for risks associated with the potential for
unauthorized access to pumping equipment.  In other words, cutting off power in the manner you
suggest would likely provide the added layer  of protection offered by a fence should the other
security measures offered by the rule, in this case 40 CFR § 112.7(g)(3)'s requirements for
securing pumps, fail.   However, because cutting off power as suggested  does not address risks to
containers, piping and appurtenances not associated with the pumps at the facility, it does not
appear to provide protection equivalent to fencing as it relates to risks to  such equipment.

       Conclusion

       Please note that determinations of "equivalent environmental protection" must be
implemented and documented in accordance with 40 CFR § 112.7(a)(2).  In addition, please be
aware that the conclusions drawn in this  letter are only for the purposes of meeting the
"environmental equivalence" standard in the SPCC regulation. PE's might nevertheless decide
to recommend non-destructive shell testing and fencing of the entire footprint of the facility for
reasons other than compliance with the SPCC rule (e.g., to protect an owner's investment in
equipment or to meet  other local, state or federal requirements).

-------
       Finally, this letter is meant to provide guidance on the "equivalent environmental
protection" standard. It docs not, however, substitute for EPA's statutes or regulations, nor does
it itself constitute a regulation. Thus, it cannot impose legally-binding requirements on EPA,
States, or the regulated community, and its recommendations may not be appropriate at an
individual site based on site-specific circumstances.

                                         Sincerely,
                                         Marianne Larmont Horinko
                                         Assistant Administrator

-------
                UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                              WASHINGTON, O.C. 20460
                                      JUl | 4 2000
Mr. Chris Early
Safety-Kleen Corporation
1301 Gervais Street
Columbia, SC 29201
      OFFICE OF
SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY
      RESPONSE
Dear Mr. Early:

      Thank you for your e-mail of May 31, 2000. Through this letter, we respond to
the questions you posed in your e-mail.

      Your first set of questions concerned the meaning of the terms "transportation-
related" and "non-transportation-related" as  they relate to SPCC facilities. You also
raised issues concerning transfers of oil in the first set of questions.  You posed the fact
situation of "a rail car containing oil that enters my site by crossing site boundaries."
You  added that the "rail car is one of many rail cars and is the only rail car containing
oil."  We will repeat your questions, and answer them immediately below.  We note that
we have coordinated our response with the  U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT).

1.  Question:  "If the rail car is passing through my facility and the oil contained in this
rail car is not loaded or unloaded is it subject to the SPCC requirements including
SPCC Plan and containment system/diversionary structure or proof of impracticability
requirements? Or, is this rail car subject to DOT requirements because it is considered
as a transportation-related unit?"

Answer:  As a general rule, we will presume that the rail car is Considered to be a
"transportation-related facility" under the 1971 Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
between DOT and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) if it is consigned to
your property or is consigned elsewhere and is being stored  incidental to transportation
in commerce.  Storage incidental to transportation in commerce is storage between the
time the oil is offered for transportation to a carrier until the time that it reaches its
destination and is accepted by the consignee, assuming no circumstances marking an
end to the transportation process.  EPA will  consider all the circumstances concerning
the presence of the rail car at the facility before determining that there has been an end
to the transportation process and a beginning of non-transportation-related storage
subject to SPCC requirements. If non-transportation-related storage has begun, the rail
car will be subject to SPCC requirements if it contains above the regulatory threshold

                                       1
                                                                R*cycl*d/R*cydabl«
                                                                PrtnM wNfc Soy/Cinota Ink on p«p«f flat

-------
amount and there is a reasonable possibility of discharge from the rail car to navigable
waters or adjoining shorelines. If the rail car is consigned to the Safety-Kleen facility, as
indicated on shipping papers, bills of lading, or other shipping documentation, then
transportation of the rail car ends once it arrives at the facility, and the rail car is subject
to SPCC requirements.  However, if the rail car is consigned to a different facility and is
merely passing through the Safety-Kleen facility on its way to its consigned destination
with no unreasonable delays, then the rail car is considered to be in storage incidental
to transportation in commerce and is not subject to SPCC requirements. Instead the
car is subject to applicable DOT requirements for the duration of such transportation.

2. Question:  "If this rail car stops on my property for any period of time but the oil in
the rail car is never loaded or unloaded is it subject to SPCC requirements at any time
including SPCC Plan and containment system/diversionary structure or proof of
impracticability requirements?"

Answer:  See the answer to Question 1 above.

3. Question: "If the rail car is loaded or unloaded  at any time is it subject to SPCC
Plan and containment system/diversionary structure or proof of impracticability
requirements?"

Answer: The loading or unloading of the rail car may mark an end to the transportation
process and the beginning of non-transportation-related storage, triggering all SPCC
requirements, assuming that the rail car stores oil in an amount above the regulatory
threshold and that there is a reasonable possibility of discharge to navigable waters or
adjoining shorelines. In this case, the rail car itself may become the non-transportation-
related facility even if no other containers at the property would qualify the property as a
non-transportation-related facility.

4. Question: "If the rail car is loaded/unloaded intermittently (i.e., over a period of 14
days oil in the rail car is unloaded on two consecutive Mondays) is the rail car subject to
SPCC requirements only during the loading events including SPCC Plan and
containment system/diversionary structure or proof of impracticability requirements?"

Answer: The loading or unloading of the rail car, whether intermittent or not, may mark
an end to the transportation process and the beginning of non-transportation-related
storage, triggering all SPCC requirements, assuming that the rail car stores oil in an
amount above the regulatory threshold and that there is a reasonable possibility of
discharge to navigable waters or adjoining shorelines. In this case, the rail car itself
may become the non-transportation-related facility even if no other containers at the
property would qualify the property as a non-transportation-related facility.

5. Question: "If the rail car enters my site (1/3 crosses the facility boundaries), is any
portion of the rail car subject to SPCC Plan requirements including  SPCC Plan and

-------
containment system/diversionary structure or proof of impracticability requirements?"

Answer:  If by entry on the site, the rail car has reached its ultimate destination, then
the transportation process has ended and non-transportation-related storage has
begun, triggering all SPCC requirements, assuming that the rail car stores oil in an
amount above the regulatory threshold and that there is a reasonable possibility of
discharge to navigable waters or adjoining shorelines.  In this case, the rail car itself
becomes the non-transportation-related facility even if no other containers at the
property would qualify the property as a non-transportation-related facility.

      Your second set of questions posited the fact situation that you demonstrate in
your SPCC Plan that it is  impracticable to provide containment systems/diversionary
structures and instead provide a strong oil contingency plan.

1. Question:  "Does the  word 'demonstrate' used here indicate that the SPCC  Plan will
only require certification by a Registered Professional Engineer no matter the reason
used to determine impracticability?"

Answer  The owner or operator of the facility must demonstrate impracticability if he
cannot provide secondary containment. The Professional Engineer must certify that
demonstration of impracticability. If the Regional Administrator disagrees with the
owner or operator's determination, he may require that the owner or operator amend his
Plan.

2. Question:  "In developing a strong Oil Contingency Plan who determines if the plan
is 'strong' enough to respond and prevent released oil from reaching navigable  water?"

Answer  The owner or operator of the facility must determine that the Contingency
Plan is adequate to meet regulatory requirements. The Professional Engineer must
certify that determination. If the Regional Administrator disagrees with the owner or
operator's determination,  he may require that the owner or operator amend his  Plan.

      Your third set of questions asked "at what point the following transportation-
related facility  unite become non-transportation related and subject to SPCC
requirements."

a. Question:  "Rail car"

Answer:  A rail car may or may not be transportation-related, depending on the use to
which it is put. Seethe 1971 MOU,§ ll(1)
-------
                                                !?w«^^v^'£:$!§%?#«'.*\i,.~.''
 »<«•
oc:
                                         IPWHPWBW^.1*?-
'„•  - • -..* •- ^\'-'^'>>&''rfft\*3&^$!igini^                          .-'
$&gj&JI^-'&*^                                             ';
™nr****rm  .y^^^^^^^^^^^^^f^.%^^^-^, ,:'.,

               &-:*:*'^i'-*'$*'.s''' ^                             pi'*%-^:-


-------
U.S. Department
of Transportation

Research &
Special Programs
Administration

400 Seventh Street S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20S90
From:
                      FEB  -4 2000
                                                            U.S. Environmental
                                                            Protection Agency
                                                            Office Solid Waste &
                                                            Emergency Response

                                                            401 M Street. SW, 5201G
                                                            Washington, DC 20460
To:
Subject:
I. Purpose
              Stephen D. Luftig, Director, Office of Emergency and Remedial Respo
              States Environmental Protection Agency
Department of Transportation, Office of Pipeline Safety Regional Directors

Director, Office of Site Remediation and Restoration EPA Region I
Director, Emergency and Remedial Response Division EPA Region II
Directors, Hazardous Waste Management Division EPA Regions
   III and IX
Director, Waste Management Division EPA Regions IV, VIII
Directors, Superfund Division EPA Regions V, VI, VII
Director, Environmental Cleanup Office EPA Region X

Jurisdiction over Breakout Tanks/Bulk Oil Storage Tanks (Containers) at
Transportation-Related and Non-Transportation-Related Facilities
       The purpose of mis agreement is to clarify jurisdictional issues and establish mutual goals
for the Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
and the Office of Pipeline Safety, Department of Transportation (DOT). This letter does not
amend the 1971 MOU between the EPA and DOT or redelegate any responsibilities agreed to
under that MOU or previously assigned to DOT or EPA under Executive Order 12777 or any
previous Executive Order.

n. Authority and History

       Section 311 of the Clean Water Act (C WA) (33 U.S.C. 1321) gives the President
authority to issue regulations regarding prevention, preparedness, and response planning for
facilities.  Executive Order 12777, signed on October 18,1991, delegates responsibilities under
CWA Section 311 to EPA to issue regulations regarding prevention, preparedness, and response
planning for non-transportation-related onshore facilities. EPA was also delegated  responsibility

                                           1

-------
to establish procedures, methods, and equipment and other requirements to prevent and contain-
discharges of oil and hazardous substances from non-transportation-related onshore facilities. -
Those regulations are found at 40 CFR 112.  DOT was delegated authority to issue regulations-
regarding prevention, preparedness, and response planning at transportation-related onshore-
facilities.  DOT was also delegated responsibility to establish procedures, methods, and-
equipment and other requirements to prevent and contain discharges of oil and hazardous-
substances from transportation-related onshore facilities.  DOT issued response planning-
regulations for transportation-related onshore oil pipelines, found at 49 CFR 194.-

       DOT also issued safety standards found at 49 CFR  195 for pipeline facilities under the-
Pipeline Safety Act of 1992 (49 U.S.C. 60101). DOT considers environmental factors when-
issuing pipeline safety standards.  -

III.  Current Status at Complex Facilities

       A  1971 Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the EPA and DOT defines-
transportation and non-transportation-related activities.  A  facility with both transportation-
related and non-transportation-related activities is a "complex facility" and is subject to the dual-
jurisdiction of EPA and DOT.  Both EPA and DOT have determined that the definition of a-
complex facility, as currently interpreted under both agencies programs,  can include an entire-
facility or a single tank.  Owners or operators of a complex facility must comply with all the-
regulatory requirements of both agencies when both agencies have jurisdiction. An example of-
dual jurisdiction is a  bulk storage container serving as a tank storing oil while also serving as a-
breakout tank  for a pipeline or other transportation purposes. Attachments 1-10 provide practical-
examples  of complex facilities showing jurisdictional delineation to minimize potential-
confusion over regulatory responsibility.  -

IV.  Next Steps

       To improve communications, both DOT and EPA have  initiated talks at the Headquarters-
level. These talks will be expanded to include regional representatives.  Better communications-
entails; (1) improving information sharing on pipeline and  tank incidents resulting in discharges-
to navigable water, material failures, human  errors and other activities resulting in a discharge;-
(2) improving information sharing relating to pollution prevention, preparedness, and response;-
(3) sharing critiques of response efforts by EPA On-Scene  Coordinators (OSCs) with DOT to-
enhance response planning of the pipeline operator (DOT may also consider these critiques in-
revisions to its regulations); (4) including an EPA participant on the Technical Hazardous Liquid-
Pipeline Safety Standards Committee (THLPSSC); (5) including a DOT Office of Pipeline Safety-
Regional member on each Inland Area Committee who may advise the EPA OSC on issues-
related to  pipelines and breakout tanks; (6) continuing the DOT practice of offering EPA OSCs-
the opportunity to review submitted response plans before  DOT approval; and (7) continuing-
discussions to resolve the jurisdictional issues surrounding oil gathering lines and their associated-
tanks.-

-------
       Cross training is also important. EPA will make space available for DOT representatives-
to attend Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure and Facility Response Planning training-
courses.  DOT will make space available for EPA representatives and OSCs to attend courses in-
pipeline safety and inspection. DOT and EPA personnel will establish the appropriate level of-
participation in these training opportunities over the next three years. The agencies will also-
explore other opportunities for cross training including the Freshwater Spill Symposium,-
Preparedness for Response Exercise Program (PREP), etc. -

       DOT and EPA will establish procedures for the joint inspection of facilities subject to-
dual jurisdiction.  A joint inspection will be considered the equivalent of a separate inspection by-
each agency.  DOT and EPA will identify risk factors to consider when identifying high-
priority/high-risk facilities subject to joint inspections.  These risk factors include, but are not-
limited to; proximity to densely populated areas, proximity to navigable waters or-
environmentally sensitive areas as defined in Area Contingency Plans or other appropriate-
documents, areas likely to be subject to natural disasters, facility spill history, and compliance-
history. DOT and EPA regional representatives will use the procedures to identify thosc-
facilities that will be jointly inspected by both agencies. Facilities should be  offered the-
opportunity to elect to participate in joint inspections. A joint inspection does not abridge the-
ability of each agency to implement enforcement activities arising from those inspections, nor-
limit the right to conduct separate inspections  of any facility subject to dual jurisdiction. DOT-
and EPA will endeavor to conduct six to ten joint inspections nationwide within one year of this-
memorandum. The agencies will assess the effectiveness of the joint inspection program at the-
completion of all of the joint inspections.-

V.  Immediate Considerations and Long Term Goals

       While DOT and EPA have different historical emphases, our respective goals are-
complementary.  The mutual long term goals of EPA and DOT are: -

       1. To ensure that all breakout tanks/bulk storage containers are appropriately regulated
       under all applicable statutes, -
       2. That the rules and enforcement practices of both agencies  are substantially equivalent  -
       to the extent possible and,  -
       3. That as many facilities as possible are subject to single jurisdiction in the interest of
       regulatory efficiency. -

       DOT and EPA want to encourage the use of tank management programs which exemplify-
"best practices/good engineering and operational  practices" in the industry. Our efforts to-
recognize excellence in performance will enable both agencies to runnel lessons back into our-
tank programs to ensure that they are dynamic and able to keep pace with developments in the-
filcd.  Both agencies share the goal of improving  the effectiveness of our tank inspection-
programs while focusing our limited resources on those facilities that pose the greatest risk to the-
environment-
                                            3,

-------
       Over a five-year period, DOT and EPA shall undertake joint efforts to measure the-
effectiveness of DOT and EPA regulatory programs in protecting the environment and-
contributing to the safety of the regulated industry. The agencies will determine and agree upon-
factors including, but not limited to regulations, implementation, enforcement, and additional-
exemplary protective measures.  DOT and EPA may invite the Coast Guard to participate in or-
review these efforts. -

       EPA and DOT are committed to working diligently towards achieving these goals. Until-
these long term goals are achieved, EPA and DOT shall respect the jurisdiction of its sister-
agency and encourage regulated facilities to fully comply with each agency's regulations.-

       For more information contact David Lopez, Director, Office of Emergency and Remedial-
Response Oil Program Center at (703) 603-8707 and Stacey Gerard, Director, Office of Policy,-
Regulations, and Training (202) 366^595.-

Attachments-

cc: d   Timothy Fields Jr, Assistant Administrator, OSWER-
       Mike Shapiro, Deputy Assistant Administrator, OSWER-
       Jim Makris, Director, CEPPO, OSWER-
       Steve Herman, Assistant Administrator, OECA-
       Eric Schaeffer, Director, Office of Regulatory Enforcement, OECA-
       Earl Salo, Assistant General Counsel for Superfund, OGC-
       Bob Cianciarulo, Superfund/Oil Program Lead Region Coordinator-
       EPA Regional Removal Managers-
       Elaine Joost, Acting Chief Counsel, RSPA-
       Commandant, U.S. Coast Guard (G-MS, G-MO, G-MSO, G-MOC, G-MOR)-
r:\text\rspa\luffell6.wpd                     4-                            Rev 02/03/00-

-------
I'
             	g)—»»—I.	




c
o
'•5
TJ
in

-^
Y £
A o



—
1
1
1
1
*
C
C
-t-
I.
T
0
f
<
a
LL




                             X
               111
               I-8!
\

t
I
I
f
I
                             X


                             X
                                                   o
                                (D
                               .C

-------
u
c
0)
                                                  c
                                                  O
C
                                                 • -  u
                                                     'C
                                                 Q_
                                                 O
                                                  I
                                                  I
                                                  I
                                                  I
             -*	<-
             X
  I	I
                                                                      QJ
                                                                      c
                                                                      c
                                                                      0
                                                                            c     >_
                                                                            O   ;
                       !§
                                                                           CO
                         E & o
O g g> =
"D ^

'•* -^
,E o
>_ c
O O

-B o


CD CL
c O
                                                                            c
                                                                            o
                           -S .2 5
                                                                                
                           c
                                                                                     c

                                                                                     E
                                                                           111,
                                                                           tJ o Q.
                                                                           ^5 -S * •
                                                                            w O ^
                                                                           •g ff^
                                                                           •—-° s
                                                                           •- °>
                                                                            §>g,5
                                                                            c
                                                                            o
                                                                           "5 -s —
                             o o>

                             b _>.
                             _>-_«
                             ^ O
                           St o
                      ^ ? *
                      -7^- -t_ m


                      m


                      111
                       D Q_
                       u ir 
                       O ° -C
                      —  O_ c
                       a-'0-'!
                       (U - y o>
                      |5|

                       038

                       X cs 5
                       Sr2 s

                      !«'*
                       8 3 aT
                       a>
         o

       5 c
       Q.T3
       to -^

       >- O
       — -C
       a ">

       S g
                                                                                lit
                                                                                  2  §•
                                                                                  W  (jj

                                                                                  ?-£
                                                                                  D «_


                                                                                  *2
                                                                                  I .2


                                                                                  B  3
                                                                                  S  o
       2
       X
       u

       g
                      5g-|

                      ^SJ;

                      i— ^ "53
                      . n S
       111-
       "D O Q>
       -TI 3 D.

       " 'S 8

       5 5 Q-


       IJJ
       a o -D
       D) a> c

       g^£ S-
       ^ ^ a>
       U O -Q

-------
      n 


-1- a>
CO JC


o|



§1
                                             (D
                                             CO
                                             o
    CD

    — cu

    •g 3
    O w 

    o^ 8-

      § fc.
                          Z
                          UJ



                          5
                  i^f ,5
                  a.  •£ c ~r

                  IHt
                  !£-8s
                  ?£. ?•
                                         ^ B


                                         1!
                                         
                        «"•*••-

                        ~ •- 1=; ~o
                              o
                                             C CO m ^

                                             ~ *" JI O
                                          c
                                          o .
                        c o^

                        "-5 «
                        O o,^
                     c 4:



                     ll
                     P-O

                    "5 i
                     a> ^
                    -£ O

                     
                                              u o .c
                                              O> v, —


                                              ° 3

                                               °9

                                                 Q.
                     5 o g S ۥ S
                     - X ^ K <5 >
                     ii C
                     B .2
                     o tj
                                               to
                        U
                        o

                        B
                      .-i a

                      "S -g
                                               1^
                                           ^l-b
                           CL
                           O


                           g
                           -C


                           c
                           o

                         B tj

                        u    --


                        lil-
                        ^,s^
                        C 

                                                   ^J
                                                   T3
                                                 O —
                                          gu


                                          cS^
                                          O CO
                                         T3 £O,
                                          C 7^

                                          e;^
                                          O)t—
                                         .2 co
                                         ^> C
                                          2 O

                                         ^1
                                         » oo
                        v> i: CD

                        J6 S^
                           T3
                           0)
                        •K ° CO
                        O JK: o
                        — c •>
                        13 O O

                        §5-°
                          -3 O)
                        to O C


                        ill
                        -£ -Q _2

                        B o .£
                                                      2
                                                      UJ

                                                      3
                              «  2

-------
O
p:
O
8
§
O
UJ
o
                                                                                U
                                                                                V
                       I	J
                                        ButpDO"]
                   o
                                                                                 Y

                                             c
                                             o

                                    ^    "5
                                         'C  Q-
                                         3  UJ
                                    Q- <

                                    O £j

                                     I

                                     I

                                     I

                                     I

                                        :
                                  4
                                         • •
-^      :
3     
                      * t)  Jr  2 .£
                      c i= £  Q.—

                      o -2  S  -Z "S"
                      u 1 8.-S  g.


                      •*~ ft)  c  O
                                                                                                                    • 0  C
                                                            "5  J-
                                                          Q-_  5  "

                                                          ? g  «-g


                                                                                                           <
                                                                                                           ct

                            ^ -
                            T=    -Q
                                                                                                               Q.  U
                                                                                                               o .0
                                                                                                                          en
                                                                                                                          c
                                                       ~ ® 
                                                                                                                    .£ ^  g-
 >  - o c  « _c
 c  Q> (i> o  .£  J




I ^11  i1!
                                                                                                           —   -  s o o  a>
                                                                                                           -£-S;£ c "5  "£
                                                                                                           ? ~ .S P --  "a
                                                     °io Si |-0  3
                                                     $ 3 a. Q. >  4,

                                                     o ro t; °  a?-0
                                                    -D ro o .^  >->_>-
                                                     _ '—	 c  >  oj
                                                     E r=T O  03 -~
                                                     O •—• C *	n  O
                                                     t. •" O
                                                                                                           .5 f*5

                                                                                                            to  O
                                                                ?B
                                                                •n  C
                   LLJ
                   5

                   i
                     I
                     o
                     5
                                                                   8     §

-------
2
O
y

1
¥>
QX
ID
•— >
00
0,
o

^^J
^^ Q)
III .n
LLJ £
K-
2:
O
1 1 i
UJ
0
^C
^
-^ 	
<£
^

o
*• >•*.
_^^^*
UJ

QQ
Q
2

UJ
o
**1*







































— —

oajy





i
'



i
<








•








Q. m
55
_
*5


_ — — — — — __ _ _ — — _
r- * r-
 '> Q. *~: U '— 1

\ .E5 S o ^ 3 UJ -^
u££ ' — i ^_ '
c c Q- l/l .. T1 oO
O fli O QJ n <^ ,;; f\^
5=^-g^ O2j-^O
•— Qj £tl rt) 1 |
3 3 3 :
~ « -c 3 i
c^O to u to i 1
1 n QJ *~ fl) 1*1
OlLih , i
k 1 •
I * ^^
!***•" "• ™ **"]
j
; J
i I-/:~'A
I ! • 3 -^ ^ o *
<^^" ' 1 T"l f~ 0 y _b^ *
1 1 0 L° 0 S /
! ; b: i— j=> S? '
L^^.-i-.^.x °- 42. i/
: j *• .•
j ^ ^'
* !
1
k i t
! ^ 	

L— / >N
t u ^ ^ \
: ; 5 _k: 05 o \

i 2^5 § /
\ ' y
» ^*
V .X
c
^ O Q)
fl) S D>
^ D c
^00
2^01
_ _
•
                                                                                               X
I	I
                                                                                                       OJ
                                                                                                                   0>
                                                                                                                   C35
                                                                                                                   O
                                                                                                            <  3  «
                                                                                                             v_  Q  "*""  QJ
                                                                                                            J  °-a  |

                                                                                                            I €  51  g
                                                                                                             c ^6  -2  Q-~
                                                                                                             O  JjJ  rt  .    3**
                                                                                                             rt\ .:li  M  TS •*—
                                                                                                            (J
                                                                                                            
   .— Q.—  Q.
    c  o -o  p
                                                                                                                   «  s  5
                                                                                                                §)•£      «
                                                                                                                c 'S  _e j=
                                                                                                            O  O
                                                                                                                   Q_ 0>  0
                                                                                                                  I  ?  §
                                                                                                                   •n  w'-s
                                                                                                                   8. £  §
                                                                                                                   e-5 =5
                                                                                                            |||oj|


                                                                                                            j" *~  0) <1>  .   O
                                                                                                            33^ £>  

o._ .-T? — o ID CL O o .£ "5 O C '«• . £ o .£ "J •- «- -c o O Q- ?> "^ i J •§ ? a '^ c "^ o J £"5 '§ ^1 .s "~ ^-i. 3 "5 ^ ^•f=nr c O 0) .52 '• ~ C "2 -c .2. OJ ^* m D X ~D CO s_ i_ ^ r *" 2 s flj- o t y ** o > c i/i £ fef iB ^ 5 g- > o ro « ° o> ~O CO O -"V ^ ^= > - S1^^ § ? I " cfe -g U .2 .2 « 2 S £ -Di^O^ I— (D ^_ w ~£ * co a O .£ LLJ S i s 1


-------

-------

O
i
Uj

O .
i—
rD

s.
Si
§'
c* ,
Uj
o


!
                             CO
00

-------
                                               _o
                                               ~B
   8.   .e
                                              L> -—
                                              O <"
                                              a>

                                              |3
                                                 c
                                              5B)   tJ2
                                             _o o
                                             "*! o>
                                              O) ">
                                             .E o

                                             "§.£
                                             S ^o

                                             'O -D
                                              O c
                                                O
                                              c _
                                              O C
                                              O 0)
 s s
ll
-8
 §>|   B-
 p n   =
       £  o
       g "a.
       -D  a,
       IB  £

       "S  o
       J2  Q.
                                                    |o
                                                    o o
                                                    c
       -r _Q

       S  5
                                                    oo —
                                                     0) O
                                                    .E o>
                                                     03

                                                    -£
                                                     B
                                                     -
                                                     00;



                                                     8-
                                                    -8u
                                                    oo O-
                                                    o.
                                             	 
-------
j
                                                                                         X
                                                                                         X
                                                                                         X
                                                                          *—L-
                                         • :
                                                                                            CD
                                                                                            C
                                                                                            C

                                                                                         M D
                                                                                                 - e

                                                                                                ?i
                                                                                                 «°
                                                                                                I §
                                                                                                ^ =6
                                                                                                 s^i
                                                                                                _o .^
                                                                                                U .2.
                                                                                                 o c
     s
     _o
     V)
     ID

     —  Ol


     1  1
     v_  <1>

     £  Q.

     e  -v,

     Q.—
     O ~o

     «  §
ACHMENT
-.— m f—  (^


T5 ?=-
O) O
y> _c
O u

8- m

§.*
0) 4>


tl O
o -
                                                                                                     0>  O

                                                                                                     |=r
                                                                                                -i: a>  . .0 -t
     4)
     Q.

     8
     Q.
     0)
     ^e  .
     - ,   flj
     O £

     o i-


     5 I
     o  o

     0  °-
        0>
                                                                                                         _
                                                                                                        vt
tal—   ._

"c £ «  2
^ = N

£f M
 S S^
                                                                                                 01


                                                                                                15 -
                                                                                                   Q-'S
     c ~R
     •S  §
     0  5"
     •i -°
     '"> -D
     
                                                                                                     'v,  C

                                                                                                     .£ J
                                                                                                     »-  U
                                                                                                     O  m
 a J
 O D

 Sir
T5 w D
•- O
 
 v» -C


 « £

 °->
 o> $
                                                                                                     QJ  O
                                                                                                     g>«
                                                                                                     _g  g
                                                                                                     *-  u
                                                                                                     c  O
                                                                                                     ,2  c
                                                                                                     B  o
                                                                                                     o  'u
                                                                                                     " ^
     II


     'Si ^ra
     _c .g
      , D
     45 O
                                                                                                     O '= &
     f:l

     Q. -^
     O  U

     Q.^

     £- °

     ^ |
     -  o
           :D
           O
 5 CN

72 ^

 o U
 c co


 O C*>
-D ro,
 c ^r~_
 e =

 01 —
 g oo

^ c
 M O
J!E

 > ">
 * D)
 o c
 a o

"* "ft
 E
 C 4)
 4T-£
 u
'> D
 4) £
~° O
 D) "
 c a>
 u -£

jo.


1 £

 £ f
 3 o

 21-

 fe-8.

 8^
   c
   o
-E Q-
*- O

S S

s-f


°°
O "u


p

o •—
5= 4)
c C

~ E
_o (D
o "5
 o i:

 4> a>

"o =
 > 
-------
eury
o
p:
o
§
5
^
Q
cc
3
CD
h-
CO
S^
ou:

is
p
  *•"*
s
                    §
0)
£8 =
.= fli
« > Q.
?«gt
•2 roi c
S = 2 S

li!^
|e|e
.2. 3 3
wS-gffi
Q. £ t £
O Q-5 Q-
•^












      3 t -0 TO « '
      . -1 Ul
""> co <• -?
O Q- ct •§
O O LU °
  I  I


     S% c  "B
     ^ c £   a, 0)
          o |"S g &1
          W £ T3 E C 3
          11 g J a '|
          !gj§« O;
          — *~ K S o"
                           co
                              .
                              ffi
                              .9
                           sEs 4 o
                           ^~ w "

                          ^ co 13 o .£ "S
                                                 LU

                                                 I
                                  2
                                  o:

-------
Pt, 112, App. C                                               40 CFR Ch. I  (7-1-03 Edition)

                                    ATTACHMENTS TU APPENDIX C

                                                 Attachment CM
                             Flowchart of Criteria for Substantial Harm
1H«* the facility transfer oil over
water to *if from vessels anJ docs
the fjicUib, have a tinal oil
siora-jc capacity greater ilion or
CHM*) lu -12.000 gallons?

No
Yes


                                                                 Submit Response Plan
               Oocs the facility Imvc a toiaF oJI
               .storage capacity givaier ihan or
               equal to I million gallon*'1
W [thin any db»vcg[\wnt capacity of ihe lar^esi
jbovfjivwitl i>il su>rjige tank plus
                 pillnw for
                                                    Ii ihe Jaciliiy located ai a distance' such
                                                    lliai a discharge fiixn the facitii> con id
                                                    Cuu^t: m'tuiy to fish ;«i and v«sel reipoasc Plans: Fish and Wildiifis anj
  Sensitive Environnwnts* (59 FR 14713. March 39. 1994) and the apphcablc Area Contingency
  rijn.
  '  Public drinking water intakes are analogous lo pubJic uatcr ^yslctns as described at CFR
                                                 52

-------
Environmental Protection Agency

ATTACHMENT C- II -CERTIFICATION OF THK AP-
  PLICAHIUTV OF THE SUBSTANTIAL HARM CRI-
  TERIA
Facility Name:	
Facility Address:	 _
  1. Does the  facility transfer oil over water
to or from vessels and does the facility have
a total oil storage capacity greater than or
equal to 42,
-------
                                    DISCLAIMER

      This document provides guidance to EPA inspectors, as well as to owners and operators of
facilities that may be subject to the requirements of the Spill Prevention, Control, and
Countermeasure (SPCC) rule (40 CFR Part 112) and the general public on how EPA intends the
SPCC rule to be implemented. The guidance is designed to implement national policy on these
issues.

      The statutory provisions and EPA regulations described in this guidance document contain
legally binding requirements.  This guidance document does not substitute for those provisions or
regulations, nor is it a regulation itself.  In the event of a conflict between the discussion in this
document and any statute or regulation, this document would not be controlling. Thus, it does not
impose legally binding requirements on EPA or the regulated community, and might not apply to a
particular situation based upon the circumstances. The word "should" as used in this Guide is
intended solely to recommend or suggest, in contrast to "must" or "shall" which are used when
restating regulatory requirements.  Similarly, model SPCC Plans in Appendices D, E, and F, as well
as examples of SPCC Plan language in the guidance, are provided as suggestions and illustrations
only. While this guidance document indicates EPA's strongly preferred approach to assure
effective implementation of legal requirements, EPA decisionmakers retain the discretion to adopt
approaches on a case-by-case basis that differ from this guidance where appropriate. Any
decisions regarding a particular facility will be made based on the statute and regulations.

       Interested parties are free to raise questions and objections about the substance of this
guidance and the appropriateness of the application of this guidance to a particular situation. This
guidance is a living document and may be revised periodically without public notice. This document
will be revised, as necessary, to reflect any relevant future regulatory amendments. EPA welcomes
public comments on this document at any time and will consider those comments in any future
revision of this guidance document.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency         vii                      Version 1.0,11/28/2005

-------
SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors
                              This page intentionally left blank.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency         viii
Version 1.0, 11/28/2005

-------