v>EPA
    United States
    Environmental Protection
    Agency
New  Indicators  of
Coastal Ecosystem
Condition
INTRODUCTION:  Coastal ecosystems, from large
estuarine systems to salt marshes, are recognized
for their important ecological function and
societal value. They provide habitat and nursery
grounds for commercially- and recreationally-
important finfish and shellfish. Marshes absorb
energy from storms and protect the land from
hurricanes. These important ecosystems are
threatened by multiple human stressors as well as
natural disturbances. The nation is losing much
of its coastal marsh due to development, land
subsidence, erosion, and sea level rise. In some
areas, invasive species have displaced native
species, threatening commercially important
biological resources by altering habitat and
productivity of the marsh. Reduction of water
 clarity, through increases in suspended sediments
 and algal blooms, adversely affects the growth of
 submerged aquatic vegetation, the nursery grounds
 for many fish and shellfish. In order to protect against
 continued degradation and loss of coastal ecosystem
 services and to plan for their remediation, new
 indicators are needed that will predict when and where
 ecosystem degradation and wetland losses will occur.

 Three ecological indicators of coastal condition are
 being investigated by researchers with the Atlantic
 Coast Environmental Indicators Consortium (ACE
 INC, www. aceinc.org):  1) phytoplankton community
 composition; 2) salt marsh elevation and plant health;
 and 3) the size distribution of aquatic organisms
 (biomass spectra).
     1) PHYTOPLANKTON COMMUNITY
     COMPOSITION AS AN INDICATOR OF COASTAL
     ECOSYSTEM CONDITION

     Phytoplankton community composition is a gauge
     of ecological condition and change.
     Phytoplankton are suspended microscopic
     algae. They are the major primary producers in
     estuarine ecosystems, have fast growth rates,
     and are sensitive to environmental disturbances.
     Phytoplankton communities, such as diatoms,
     dinoflagellates, chlorophytes, cyanobacteria,
     and cryptomonads each have their own unique
     diagnostic photopigment signature that can be used
     to identify the composition of the phytoplankton
     community. (Photopigments, such as chlorophylls
     and carotenoids, are molecules that capture and
     convert light into chemical energy for powering
     photosynthesis).
      Watershed/Airshed
        Processes
irshed I
"	)    Cffecton
                                   Illustration courtesy of Alan Joyner
       Figure 1. Roles of diagnostic photopigments as indicators of
       ecosystem productivity and plant community composition in
       response to physical-chemical stressors in estuarine and coastal
       waters.
     Ecological Indicator: The structure of phytoplankton communities is a broadly applicable,
     integrative indicator of ecological condition of aquatic ecosystems.

-------
Ecological Effect/Impact:  Changes in phytoplankton community composition are important
indicators of estuarine and coastal ecological condition and health because phytoplankton plays a major
role in primary production, eutrophication (including harmful algal blooms), nutrient cycling, water
quality, and food web dynamics.

Environmental Application: Phytoplankton community composition can serve as an early warning
signal of toxic or hypoxia-generating algal blooms. It has proven useful and applicable for evaluating
ecosystem and regional responses to environmental stressors,  including increased nutrient loads,
changes in hydrologic characteristics, and climatic disturbances such as hurricanes and droughts.
Together with the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, researchers at
the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill's Institute of Marine Sciences are using diagnostic
pigment (e.g., chlorophyll a) concentration as the criteria for meeting allowable total maximum daily
(nutrient)  loads (TMDLs). In addition, diagnostic photopigments are used to determine phytoplankton
community changes in response to hydrological variability, including hurricanes and droughts. Results
from North Carolina's Neuse River Estuary/Pamlico Sound system show that when conditions
"freshen"  in response to hurricanes and flooding, fast growing, low salinity-adapted chlorophytes
(green algae) become dominant (Fig. 2). Conversely, when drought conditions prevail, slower-growing
dinoflagellates prevail in wintertime and cyanobacteria (blue-green algae) prevail in summertime (Fig.
2). Cyanobacteria can be especially dominant when a moderate to wet spring is followed by summer
drought conditions. This sequence of events introduces high nutrient loads, followed by a reduction
in flow and flushing, and subsequent retention of the nutrients; an ideal scenario for cyanobacterial
blooms. Aside form impacting water quality, such hydrologic  and nutrient-driven changes have
        Figure 2. Contribution of some key phytoplankton taxonomic groups (chlorophytes, cyanobacteria and
        dinoflagellates) to total chlorophyll a concentrations in the Neuse River Estuary, NC. The dates of landfall of the
        seven major hurricanes that have significantly affected flow and nutrient enrichment since mid-1996 are shown.

-------
significant food web ramifications,
affecting finfish and shellfish productivity
and habitability in estuaries.

Photopigments also provide a key data
source for verification and calibration
of remote-sensing measurements of
phytoplankton production and community
composition for estuarine and coastal
water bodies nationally. The use of remote
sensing allows researchers and managers
to "scale-up" to whole ecosystem
assessments of productivity and ecological
condition. For example, in the Chesapeake
Bay, aircraft-based remote sensing data
are being coupled to diagnostic pigment
analysis to "scale-up" assessments of
nutrient and freshwater discharge controls
on phytoplankton and bloom formation for
the entire estuary at monthly and seasonal
intervals (Figure 3). These indicators
are also now part of unattended water
quality  monitoring of estuarine and coastal
sounds. Data from regular ferry crossings
were used as indicators of large-scale
assessment of the impacts of Hurricane
Isabel (Sept. 2003) on North Carolina's
Pamlico Sound (www.ferrymon.org).
        03-Apr-2003
39.5
39.0
38.5
37.5
Chi [mg/m3]
    77.0   76.5   76.0
                 25-Jul-2003
Chl [mg/m3]
                                39.5
                                38.0
                                37.0  - —
                                    77.0
                                          76.5
                                                76.0
                                                      75.5
Figure 3. Chlorophyll (chl-a, mg m~3) distributions in Chesapeake Bay from aircraft
remote sensing of ocean color using SAS III for spring and summer flights in 2003.
  Paerl, H.W., L.M. Valdes, J.L. Pinckney, M.F. Piehler, J. Dyble and PH. Moisander.
   2003. Phytoplankton photopigments as Indicators of Estuarine and Coastal
   Eutrophication. BioScience 53(10) 953-964.
  Paerl, H. W., J. Dyble, J.L. Pinckney, L.M. Valdes, D.F. Millie, PH. Moisander, J.T.
   Morris, B. Bendis, B., and M.F. Piehler. 2005. Using microalgal indicators to assess
   human and climactically-induced ecological change in estuaries. Pp. 145-174, In
   S. Bartone (Ed.) Proceedings of the Estuarine Indicators Workshop. Boca Raton.
   Florida: CRC Press, Orlando
                    2) RELATIVE ELEVATION AND PLANT HEALTH AS INDICATORS OF
                    COASTAL MARSH STABILITY AND PRODUCTIVITY
                    The health and productivity of
                    coastal wetlands are dependent
                    upon the success of the plant life,
                    which in turn is dependent upon
                    the plant's relationship to sediment,
sea level, and the tide. Many coastal marshes depend
on sediments supplied by rivers to counteract the
effects of land subsidence, sea-level rise, and sediment
compaction. In some areas, changes on the land have led
to reduced riverine sediment supply to marshes, leading
to a decrease in height relative to mean sea level. Where
dams or levees have been constructed to prevent flooding,
marshes have been cut  off from their source of sediment,
and the net effect is conversion of marsh habitat to open
water.
            Vertical elevation is a critical variable that determines
            the productivity and stability of salt marshes. The long-
            term existence of the salt marsh depends on the success
            of the dominant plants, such as Spartina and Jimcus,
            and their close relationship to sediment supply, sea level
            change, and tidal range.

            Researchers at the University of South Carolina,
            Columbia, SC and the Marine Biological Laboratory,
            Woods Hole, MA have developed two coastal indicators
            that can be applied to assess the condition of coastal
            marshes. One is vertical elevation relative to mean sea
            level (geomorphic) and the other is level of stress of
            marsh vegetation (physiologic).

-------
 Geomorphic Indicator:  The vertical elevation
 relative to mean sea level is an important geomorphic
 indicator of marsh productivity and stability and is
 determined by using Light Detection and Ranging
 (LIDAR) remote sensing. This LIDAR elevation
 data is combined with a high resolution Airborne
 Data Acquisition and Registration (ADAR) digital
 camera image of the marsh landscape to construct
 a frequency distribution of marsh landcover with
 elevations relative to the elevation of mean sea level.
 The frequency distribution is then compared to
 optimal distributions across the range of tolerance for
 the specific vegetation.

 Ecological Effect/Impact:  The height of coastal
 marshes relative to sea level will move upwards
 or downwards toward equilibrium with the sea
 depending on factors such as the rate of sea level rise
 and amount of sedimentation. When this equilibrium
 drops below an optimum level either by a rapidly
 changing sea level or changes in the supply of mineral
 sediment and organic matter, the salt marsh vitality
 will decline. A decline in relative elevation of the
 marsh surface below an optimum suggests that coastal
 marshes are on a course leading to degradation.
                                       Physiological Indicator: The level of stress
                                       of marsh vegetation is an important indicator
                                       of marsh productivity and stability. Two
                                       complementary measurements, one ground-
                                       based and the other remotely-sensed, are
                                       applied to measure stress. The ground-based
                                       technique is based on the fluorescence emitted
                                       by a leaf as measured by a Pulse Amplitude
                                       Modulated (PAM) fluorescence meter and
                                       gives an estimate of the efficiency of energy
                                       utilization by the leaf. A healthy leaf will have
                                       a higher energy efficiency than a leaf that is
                                       stressed. The remotely-sensed measurements
                                       detect different forms of xanthophyll pigments.
                                       Xanthophyll pigments change form in order to
                                       protect the plant's photosytems so can they be
                                       used as an indicator of stress.

                                       Ecological Effect/Impact:  The stress of
                                       marsh vegetation, as measured by the spectral
                                       reflectance of plant pigments, is governed by
                                       nutrient and water availability, phytotoxins,
                                       salinity, and relative sea level. Combining
                                       marsh elevation data with measurements of the
                                       level of stress of vegetation is an integrative
                                       indicator of marsh productivity, health, and
                                       stability.
120X103 -

100x103 -

 80x1O3
 CD
CO
*   60x1 03 -
 ED
    40x103 -
    20x1 O3 -
                Spartina alterniflora
             CO
          0.0
0.2         0.4
   Elevation (m)
                                       0.6
0.8
Figure 4. The distribution of Spartina habitat elevations at North
Inlet, SC (Tide Range - 1.39 m). Distribution is a function of the
rates of sea level rise and  land subsidence.
                                       Environmental Application: These
                                       indicators offer a cost-effective alternative
                                       for assessing risk for wetland loss, as well as
                                       monitoring the condition of coastal wetlands
                                       and the success of restoration efforts. Resource
                                       managers can use this information, for
                                       example, to apply mitigation techniques for
                                       adjusting sediment supply for wetlands at high
                                       risk of inundation.
Moms, J.T., P.V. Sundareshwar, C.T. Nietch, B. Kjerfve, D.R.
  Cahoon. 2002. Responses of coastal wetlands to rising sea
  level. Ecology 83:2869-2877.
Morris, J.T., D. Porter, M., Neet, P. A. Noble, L. Schmidt, L. A.
  Lapine, and J. Jensen. 2005. Integrating LIDAR, multispectral
  imagery and neural network modeling techniques for marsh
  classification. Int. J. Remote Sensing. (In press).

-------
3) BIOMASS SIZE SPECTRA AS AN INDICATOR OF
ECOSYSTEM STATE

Abiomass size spectrum (BSS) depicts the abundance
and distribution of organisms by size classes in an
ecosystem. In aquatic ecosystems, the biomass (i.e.,
aggregate weight) of organisms at each level in the
food chain from microscopic phytoplankton to the
largest vertebrate animals is nearly equal. Because
biomass is near equal, numbers of small organisms
greatly exceed numbers of large organisms. Size-
specific predation (big organisms eat smaller ones) in
aquatic communities maintains the observed biomass
size structure and has led to methods for evaluation of
biomass-size relationships to characterize the structure
and state of ecosystems. To derive BSS, data from
monitoring programs on organism abundances must
be aggregated into size categories. BSS models can
serve as ecological indicators because properties of
BSS respond to natural or human-induced stressors.
ACE INC scientists at the University of Maryland are
evaluating BSS as an indicator of ecosystem state in
Chesapeake Bay.
  Biomass Size Spectra as Indicators of Ecosystem Status
       Unperturbed ecosystem
          theoretical slope =-1.0
                                      system

     Log Weight Class
Log Weight Class
                            Illustration courtesy of William J. Connelly
                      University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science
Figure 5. Conceptual illustration of a normalized biomass
size spectrum (numbers of organisms plotted against weight
classes) in an unperturbed (left panel) and perturbed (right
panel) ecosystem. In a perturbed ecosystem, abundance
of small, undesirable phytoplankton (A) may increase while
abundance and size of large organisms (fish) may decline (B).
As a result, the slope of the disturbed biomass size spectrum
becomes steeper and other statistical properties (e.g., levels of
abundance) may shift.
                Ecological Indicator:  Changes in the slope or other statistical properties of the
                normalized BSS relative to reference standards or historical benchmarks is an indicator
                of changes in the abundance and biomass of the suite of organisms in an aquatic
                ecosystem.

                Ecological Effect/Impact:  Changes in the slope of the normalized BSS can be
                indicative of changes in the biological community structure, productivity, food-chain
                efficiency, predator-prey relationships,  and effects of environmental variability, fishing,
                nutrient loading, and habitat change. BSS of stressed ecosystems often have steep
                negative slopes. For example, in heavily fished ecosystems larger fish may be reduced
                in number and biomass. Or, in highly eutrophic ecosystems with excess nutrient
                loading, blooms of microscopic phytoplankton can greatly increase the abundance
                and biomass of small organisms, leading to stressful conditions such as hypoxia and
                mortality of larger organisms (e.g., crabs, fish).

                Environmental Application: BSS can be used by managers to  describe long-term
                effects of stress or the success  of restoration efforts in estuaries impacted by human
                activities. BSS can be applied to a broad suite of aquatic biological communities,
                not only to selected organisms, and thus can indicate how whole ecosystems are
                responding to either deteriorating conditions or remediation efforts in resource
                management (e.g., better fisheries management, habitat restoration, improved water
                quality). Periodic monitoring of sizes and abundances of organisms is required to
                apply BSS as an indicator.
                                            Jung, S. and E.D.Houde. 2005. Fish Biomass Size Spectra in Chesapeake
                                              Bay. Estuaries 28(2): 226-240.

-------
vvEPA
     United States
     Environmental Protection
     Agency
     Office of Research and Development
     Washington DC
     EPA/600/S-05/004
     May 2005
                      EPA's Science to Achieve Results (STAR)
                    Estuarine and Great Lakes (EaGLe) Program
                                              GLEI
                                              Great Lakes Environmental Indicators Project
                                              University of
                                              Minnesota-Duluth
                                              f   }

      PEEIR           l^ .;
      Pacific Estuarine
      Ecosystem Indicator
      Research Consortium
      University of California-Davis
                                     Consortium for Estuarine
                             Ecoindicator Research for the Gulf of Mexico
                                  University of Southern Mississippi
w
          CEERGOM
                                         ASC
                                         Atlantic Slope Consortium
                                         Pennsylvania State University

                                       EaGLe Program HQ
                                           Washington DC
ACE  INC
Atlantic Coast Environmental
Indicators Consortium
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
  • University of Maryland
  • University of South Carolina
  • Ecosystems Center, Marine Biological Laboratory
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)-
   Beaufort, NC
            Direct and indirect effects of
            human activities have taken a
            toll on the nation's estuaries, yet
    few direct linkages have been identified
    between human activities on  land and
    responses in estuarine ecosystems. The
    Atlantic Coast Environmental Indicators
    Consortium (www.aceinc.org) is one
    of five national projects funded  by
    EPA's EaGLe program. The goal of the
    EaGLe program is to develop the next
    generation of ecological indicators that
    can be used in a comprehensive coastal
    monitoring program.
           Printed on chlorine free 100% recycled paper with
           100% post-consumer fiber using vegetable-based ink.
                                                 U.S. EPA
                                        Office of Research and Development
                                      National Center for Environmental Research
                                              Barbara Levinson
                                               202-343-9720
                                           Levinson.Barbara@epa.gov
                                        http://es.epa.gov/ncer/centers/eagles
                          Atlantic Coast Environmental
                          Indicators Consortium
                          University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
                          Hans Paerl
                          252-726-6841,ext. 133
                          hpaerl@email.unc.edu
                          www.aceinc.org
                       U.S. EPA
                       Mid-Atlantic Integrated Assessment
                       Patricia Bradley
                       410-305-2744
                       bradley.patricia @ epa.gov
                       www.epa.gov/maia

-------