United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Solid Waste and
Emergency Response
(5305)
EPA530-R-95-007
PB95-191 219
March 1995
&EPA
State Program
Advisory #15
I
CO
C"J
Headquarters Library
-------
s
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
•WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
FEB - 8 1995
MEMORANDUM
OFFICE OF
SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
s
SUBJECT: State Program Advisory Number Fifteen
FROM: Michael H. Shapiro, Director^
Office of Solid Waste
TO: Regional Division Directors, Regions I-X
The State and Regional Programs Branch (SRPB) periodically
issues State Program Advisories (SPAs) to update the State
Authorization Manual (SAM) as new RCRA program policies,
regulations, and self-implementing statutory provisions come into
effect.
With this memorandum, I am transmitting SPA 15, which covers
RCRA program changes for the period of July 1, 1993, through June
30, 1994. SPA 15 contains 10 new revision checklists and Model
Attorney-General's Statement language for the changes covered in
the SPA.
If you have any questions about any of these materials,
please contact State and Regional Programs Branch-Chief,
Michaelle Wilson at: (703) 308-8790.
Attachments
cc: Dev Barnes
Section Chiefs, Regions I-X
Branch Chiefs, Regions I-X
State Program Liaisons
Printed on Recycled Paper
-------
s
-------
s
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
Summary for State Program Advisory Fifteen
This SPA covers the period July 1,1993, through June 30,1994, and includes this summary plus
three attachments. The first attachment, Attachment A, contains new Revision Checklists 125-
134 and their corresponding summaries and FR articles. Attachment B contains updates to the
State Authorization Manual (SAM), including Tables G-1 and G-2, the Checklist Linkage Table,
the Model Revision Attorney General's Statement, and a revised Revision Checklist 49.
Attachment C includes the updated (through June 30,1994) consolidated checklists for the Land
Disposal Restrictions, Boilers and Industrial Furnaces, Toxicity Characteristic, Wood Preserving,
and the Bevill Exclusion for Mining Wastes. Attachment C also contains two new consolidated
checklists: 1) Recycled Used Oil Management Standards Consolidated Checklist, which
consolidates the requirements of Revision Checklists 112, 122 and 130, and 2) Treatability
Studies Consolidated Checklist, which consolidates the requirements of Revision Checklists 49
and 129.
The following points briefly highlight the content of SPA 15. These points are organized by topic.
Checklists
New
This SPA provides ten new checklists (Numbers 125 through 134) covering regulatory
changes for the period July 1,1993, through June 30,1994. All checklists are in RCRA
Cluster IV. Revision Checklists 125,126 and 130 contain both HSWA and Non-HSWA
provisions, Checklist 127 contains HSWA provisions, and Checklists 128,129,131,132,
133 and 134 contain only non-HSWA provisions.
Existing
A new prenote was added to Revision Checklist 49 that explains the relationship of this
checklist to Revision Checklist 129. This note also states that, while Revision Checklist
49 is optional, EPA strongly encourages States to adopt the provisions addressed by it.
These provisions help facilitate evaluating remediation alternatives for CERCLA clean-
ups and for the RCRA Corrective Action Program. The rule addressed by Revision
Checklist 49 also will speed research and development for treatment alternatives to land
disposal and waste minimization, recycling and reuse.
Cluster information
SPA 15 delineates timeframes by which States must obtain authorization for RCRA
Cluster IV. The due date is July 1,1995 (July 1,1996 if a State statutory change is
necessary). For further information on the Cluster Rule, see September 26,1966 (51
FR 33712).
SUM.1S - 9/26/94
2/1/9SI
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
SAM
This SPA provides updated Tables G-1 and G-2, a Model Revision Attorney General's
Statement, and a Checklist Linkage Table to insert into the SAM.
S
SUM.15 • 9/26O4
(Pr«»d: 2/1*5]
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9S41.00-21
SPA 15
I
ATTACHMENT A
Summaries and New Revision Checklists,
Corresponding Federal Register Articles
-------
I
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541,00-21
SPA 15
Revision Checklist 125 Summary'
t
Rule Title:
Checklist Title:
Reference:
Promulgation Date:
Effective Date:
Cluster:
Provision Type:
Linkage:
Optional:
Requirements for Preparation, Adoption, and Submittal of
Implementation Plans
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces; Changes for Consistency with
New Air Regulations
58 EE 38816-38884
July 20, 1993
August 19, 1993
RCRA Cluster IV
HSWA/non-HSWA
Revision Checklists 85,
94
No
Summary: This final rule was promulgated pursuant to the Clean Air Act, rather than the
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, and primarily amends the "Guideline on Air Quality
Models (Revised)" (referred to as the "Guideline") in 40 CFR Parts 51 and 52. However, this
rule also makes conforming changes to 40 CFR Parts 260 and 266 to ensure that the
guidelines for air quality modeling and screening for boilers and industrial furnaces burning
hazardous waste are consistent with the guidelines in 40 CFR Part 51. Specifically, EPA is
removing Appendix X to 40 CFR Part 266 and is changing references to the Guideline in that
Part to refer to 40 CFR Part 51, Appendix W. EPA also revises the "Screening Procedures for
Estimating the Air Quality Impact of Stationary Sources" reference at i 260.11 (a).
State Authorization: This rule was promulgated under the Clean Air Act. However, with,
respect to the RCRA revisions, it is considered promulgated under the same authorities as the
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces (BIF) rule that added the RCRA provisions being amended by
this present rule. The BIFs rule is considered HSWA or non-HSWA, depending on the type
of units to which the regulations are being applied. In the case of sludge dryers, infrared
incinerators, carbon regeneration units and plasma arc incinerators, the provisions are non-
HSWA and do not go into effect until a State is authorized for them. With respect to all other
devices, the provisions are considered HSWA provisions and go into effect immediately. Only
final authorization is available for the non-HSWA portion. Both interim and final authorization
are available for the HSWA portion. Interim authorization expires January 1,2003. The rule
is placed in RCRA Cluster IV. The State modification deadline is July 1, 1995 (or July 1,
1996 if a State statutory change is necessary). The State Revision Application must include
applicable regulations, AG statement addendum. Revision Checklist 125, other associated
checklists and other application materials, i.e. a program description and an MOA, as
determined by the Regional office.
Attorney General's Statement Entry: The following entry should be placed at Subsection XX F
in the Model Revision Attorney General's Statement.
F. State statutes and regulations are amended such that the
procedures for conducting air quality modeling and screening for boilers and
industrial furnaces burning hazardous wastes reference the method
recommended in Appendix W of 40 CFR Part 51. State regulations and
SUM125.15-12/21/94
(Printed: 12/21/94)
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
Revision Checklist 125 Summary (cont'd)
statutes also incorporate by reference the October 1992 edition of "Screening
Procedures for Estimating the Air Quality Impact of Stationary Sources" as
indicated in Revision Checklist 125.
Federal Authority: Si 1006, 2002, 3001 through 3007, 3010 and 7004; 40
CFR 260.11 (a), 266.104{e)(3), 266.106(h) and Part 266 Appendix X, as
amended July 20, 1993 (58 EB 38816).
Citation, flf LflVY8 anf^ Regulations! Date of Enactment and Adoption
Remarks of the Attorney General
I
SUM125.15-12/21/94
(Print** 12/21/941
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
t
RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 125
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces;
Changes for Consistency with New Air Regulations
58 FR 38816-38884
July 20, 1993
(RCRA Cluster IV, HSWA/non-HSWA provisions)
Notes: 1) The final rule addressed by this checklist was promulgated pursuant to the Clean Air
Act, rather than the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, and primarily amends regulations
in 40 CFR Parts 51 and 52. However, this rule also makes conforming changes to 40 CFR Parts
260 and 266 to ensure that the guidelines for air quality modeling and screening for boilers and
industrial furnaces burning hazardous waste are consistent with the guidelines in 40 CFR Part 51.
Only the changes to 40 CFR Parts 260 and 266 are included in this checklist. These revisions are
necessary. Therefore, this checklist has been developed to help States maintain consistency with
the Federal regulations. Note that States do rjgi have to adopt the changes to 40 CFR Parts 51
and 52 to make the Part 260 and 266 changes. Rather, States should reference Appendix W,
Part 51 at 266.104(eH3> and 266.106(h).
2) Note that EPA's Office of Solid Waste is treating the changes made by the Air rule to 40 CFR
Parts 260 and 266 as HSWA provisions because they amend the BIF regulations promulgated
under HSWA.
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRM-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
PART 260 - HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM; GENERAL
' SUBPART B - DEFINITIONS
REFERENCES
revise reference to
"U.S. EPA, Screening
Procedures for
Estimating the Air
Quality Impact of
Stationary Sources" to
refer to the October
1 992 version
260. 11 (a)
*
July 20, 1993-Page 1 of 2
OCL12S.1S - ntvtod; M9I94
Printed: 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 125: Boilers and Industrial Furnaces;
Changes for Consistency with New Air Regulations (cont'd)
FB)BUL REQUIREMENTS
t . .
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS: —
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRM-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADE^
IN SCOPE
PART 266 - STANDARDS FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF SPECIFIC HAZARDOUS WASTES AND
SPECIFIC TYPES OF HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITIES
SUBPART H - HAZARDOUS WASTE BURNED IN BOILERS AND INDUSTRIAL FURNACES
STANDARDS TO CONTROL ORGANIC EMISSIONS
change wording to
refer to Appendix W,
Part 51, methods
rather than Appendix
X, Part 266, methods;
change wording to
reflect updated
260.1 1 (a) reference;
remove "on-site" after
"average" in last
sentence
266.104(e)(3)
A
STANDARDS TO CONTROL METALS EMISSIONS jfl
change wording to
refer to Appendix W,
Part 51, methods
rather than Appendix
X, Part 266, methods;
change wording to
reflect updated
260. 11 (a) reference
266.106(h)
• •
APPENDIX X TO PART 266
GUIDELINE ON AIR QUALITY MODELS (REVISED)
remove text; change
title to 'Appendix X-
Removed"
.'. -li" .:•. .
266, Appendix X
••'"•«
July 20, 1993 - Page 2 of 2
DCU25.1S - fevMd: 1/8/9*
Printed: 12/21/94
-------
I
Tuesday
July 20k 1993
Part It
Protection Agency
40 CFR Part 51, et al.
Requtmnants for
and Submittal of
Final Ruia
Adoption,
Plans;
-------
38816 Te^deral Register /Vol. 58.W 137 / Tuesday, July 20. 1863 /Rules and Regulations
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40CraPam51,52,260«nd"2«6
7t Docket NO. A-88-04]
Monday through Friday. A reasonable
Reqirironienta for Preparation,
Adoption, and Submtttal of
Implementation Plant
AGENCY: U.S. Environmental Protection
.Agency (EPA).
ACTION; Final rule.
WMUftV: The "Guideline on Air
Quality Models (Revised)" (hereinafter.
the "Guideline"), as modified by
supplement A (1987). sets forth air
quality models and guidance for
estimating ambient air concentrations
due to sources of air pollutants. The
Guideline is presently incorporated by
reference into the prevention of
significant deterioration (PSD)
regulations under the Clean Air Act. On
February 13,1991. EPA issued a Notice
of Proposed Rulemaldng (NPR) to
further clarify and update the Guideline.
as well as to augment the Guideline
with several new modeling techniques,.
. and to codify the Guideline for all air
quality planning purposes. Today EPA.
takes final action in order to add new
models to the Guideline and improve
-existing models. In addition, this action
amends the CFR to i
supplement B as codlfit
as giving regulatory status to long*
standing EPA policy regarding the use
of air quality models for other regulatory
programs. Therefore. EPA is' setting out -•
the Guideline, revised by supplements •
A and B, as appendix W to 40 CFR part
81. Adoption of these new and refined
modeling techniques and associated
guidance should significantly improve
the technical basis for impact
assessment of air pollution sources.
EFFECTIVE DATtvrhis rule is effective
August 19,1993.
MM FURTHER UronaMTMM CONTACT: • .
Joseph A. Tikvart, Chief. Source
Receptor Analysis Branch. Office of Air
Quality Planning and Standards (MD—
14), U.S. Environmental Protection '
Agency. Research Triangle Park. NC
27711; Telephone (919) 541-5562 or C.
Thomas Coulter. (919) 541-0832.
AMNKSSCS: Docket Statement: All
documents relevant to this rule have
been placed in Docket No. A-8S-44,
located in the Central Docket Section,
Room M1SOO (First Floor. Waterside
Mall), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency. 401M Street SW.. Washing
DC 20480. This docket is available f
public inspection and copying from
8:30-12 a.m. and 1:30-3:30 pan..
Document Availability: The new
modeling techniques are incorporated as
supplement B (1993) to the Guideline.
Supplement B may be obtained by
-•downloadinga Jext file from the
SCRAM (Support Canter for Regulatory
Air Models) electronic bulletin board
system by dialing in on (919) 541-5742.
Supplement B may also be obtained
upon written request from the Source
Receptor Analysis Branch, TI.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (MD-
14).*esaarch Triangle Park, NC 27711.
The "Guideline on Air Quality Models
(Revised)" (1988). supplement A (1987).
and supplement B (1993) an for sal*
from the U.S. Department of Commerce.
Technical Information Service (NTIS),
582S Port Royal Road. Springfield, VA
22181. These documents an also
available for inspection at each of the
ten EPA Regional Offices and at the EPA
library at 401M Street SW, Washington.
DC. . .
TIOH:
revising the Guideline and in
accordance with section 320 of the
Clean Air Act. the First, Second. Third
and Fourth Conferences on Air Quality
Modeling wen held. These modeling
conferences provided EPA with
comments on the Guideline and
associated revisions, thereby facilitating
introduction of improved modeling
techniques into the regulatory process.}
On February 13.1991 (op. eft.), EPA
proposed additional changes to the
Guideline referred to as supplement B.
Pursuant to this proposal and Clean Air
Act Section 320. the Fifth Conference on
Air Quality Modeling was held in
March 1991. Its purpose was to solicit
public comment on new modeling
techniques proposed for inclusion in
supplement B, and to guide EPA's
consideration of any rulemaking needed
to further revise the Guideline. The
revisions proposed in supplement B
The "Guideline on Air Quality
Models" (hereinafter, the "Guideline")
was originally published In
TheGu
Haliiut Mmmfffot
1978.
.in
the use of modeling as part of the air
management process. By setting forth
models, techniques and guidance, the
' Guidelin* provides model users with a
common basis for estimating pollutant
.control strategies and specifying
L Hmfta Bif TTilam^lring jri )m|«
1978 (43 FR 28380), the Guideline
incorporated by reference into the PSD
regulations at 40 GFR 51.168(1) and
52.21(1). The Guideline was
revised in 1986 (51 FR
32176). and later updated with the *
addition of supplement A (S3 FR 392).*
As a matter of EPA policy, the Guideline
;has also been applied since its inception
to SIP revisions for existing sources of
air pollutants and to all new source
Between 1978 and 1988, ia order to
support the process of developing and
*Ini«*i«wliwtld*praiBbU. aott aw dttincttoa
tpM~"r "* "•""•**"•
i A to
»0o Fehrosry M.jatt the Guideline, et
nde* et 40 cm pert ass. Nbp«i H (» n nos).
The Guideline WM mbMOMnd} pubnehed M
•pptodta X to pert iSS (SS n U7M); thta Mked
the flnt itae the Guideline bed been pubtiihed far
situations when specific procedures
had not previously been available, and
"also improved several previously
adopted techniques. As discussed at the
modeling conference, proposed changes
included:
Complex tenant models (CTDMPLUS and
CTSCREEN): Mobile sauna modeling it
rignatod JatetecttoM; Baa«iioat end
dispersion modeling sysisiu Cot ettpofts:
Modeling technique* for air pathway
Oa-sita m
obificat ptognm guida
Gmeni scnmlng tsdmioues;
Meuiad tot evaluanng models;
Altsnale models in appanoix B;
Supplementary changes; and
i
r topics (including deletion of models no
kmgeruswi).
For additional information of these
r to 56 FR 5900-5907,
February 13,1991.
Final Action
Today's action updates the Guideline
with changes incorporating supplement
B. slightly modified in form since
proposal. All significant comments have
been considered, and whenever they
revealed any new 'information or
suggested any alternative solutions.
such wen considered In EPA's final
^action. Also, in keeping with the Office
of the Federal Register's current policy
on .compliance with the Federal Register
Act (44 U.S.C. 1502 at «eq.) and the
Administrative Procedures Act (5 U.S.C.
551 et sea.}, as sat forth in 1 CFR part
SI, EPA is setting out the Guideline.
» OB Nowofcer 18.1MB. the den Air Act
loMMO.Pub.U101-4M.Mn
L Af eMBded. the CUen Ate Act pnvtda
rity s» tae elr qmUty owddiag
tuoeUlMl nvtaien* to the
-------
Fedsaal Rtgtotar / .Vol. SB.,No.. 137 /. Tueeday» July. 20. 1993 /•' Rutea and Regulations 38*17
I
11 In •
261>, and cfaangtog lemmnceato
Guideline to that put to 40 QPR part SI.
appendix W. EPA is abo updating a
reference to §260.11(a). '
As proposed. EPA is adopting
CTDMPLUS as a refined technique to be
included to appendix A of the
GuideUne. However, requirements
m*
lofmeteorologicafdatatorun
CTDMPLUS an being relaxed from
those originally proposed: the maximum
height is 100 meters, provided that
remote sensing data (e^, SQDAR) up to
representative plume height an
available on a routine hourly basis.
CTSCREEN is being adopted as an
acceptable screening technique. The
rfscieentogmodeL
may continue to be used, but the
hierarchy in terms of degree of
conservatism for complex terrain
screening models has Men eliminated.
As proposed, a new model.
CAL3QHC. is included to the GuideUne
for estimating carbon monoxide
concentrations at signalized
intersection*. Use olCAUNE4 and '
TEXIN2 may continue to anas when
their application has already been
established at the time supplement B is
promulgated, to response to public
comments, the "Guideline for Modeling
Carbon Monoxide from Roadway
Intersections" has been modified and
mmmr »mm^umnmmmmmVSI«MB mm «MT w+umae
the NasMBel Pack Servtofrto
visual ranges and encourage i
development of a ngtona7naze.modei
As proposed. RPAls including the
.— . • - -%_J I I &• •* L
HH«i»M, am a» •miiiming MM v^lf. ID Ul]
M for Determining the Best comments
[no Modal" •• tha lmi> tnr - **l~~w.~~4
Performing Model" as the basis for
use of an alternative
: B) model far a site-specin'c
actions for this Notice of Final
Rulemakiat fathe.document "Summary
of Public Comments and EPA Betpomes
on the Fifth Conference on Air Quality
Modeling: March 1M1" (Docket Item V-
C-l). In this document all significant
have been considered and
don
Model (sea/lake breeze fumigation) and
WYNDvalley (valley stagnation) an
being included to appendix B of the
Guideline. These models, along with
MESOPUFF U (long range transport) and
PLUVUE D (visibility), which an
already to appendix B. an identified as
available for application to the unique
circumstances to which they apply on a
case-by-cese basis.
EPA is making several supplementary
changes to the Guideline. As proposed,
ERTAQ and MPSDM have bean deleted
from appendix B of the Guideline. EPA
has also clarified and updated purlieus
of the GuideUne to make ft consistent
with current regulatory programs that
L_J * - - - - -.-t-K-i • *1-- »- ,,ai, __
naa Dean enaousnea inrougn omer
(Offsfabm and Coastal Onenton Model)
in appeadfot A of HwGnideihw is being
updated. Abo as proposed, EKMA and
UAM (Urban Airshed Model), which is
also in appendix A. an being updated
to include the CB-rV chemical
mechanism end gntdanm
Finally, supplemeBt B clarifies the
iatemmrtdala*
proposed, EDMS t Emissions and
Dispersion Modeling System) is being
included in appendix A of the
Guideline for assessing air pollutant
con ft^Hitr^ti on f d GIVIDAQ tifDorts ABO
military bases.
As proposed, DEGADIS (AENea GAs
D/Spersion Model) is being included to
appendix B of tin Guideline. The ISCZ
(industrial Source Complex) model is
nn^ frying BMffT»Hy *»fn"^mma^mA tarn mH
air pathway analyses, as originaHy
propceedi it is now being rAcomnModad
for some apedflc regulatory nrosnouv
The proposed Sour Bwali&B/DBluvT
(SRITH method for determining ......
aliiiuepheric stability dsjsa is being • •
withdrawn from supplement B (see
explanation under "Discussion of Public
Comments and Issues").
As proposed. EPA has identified
general screening techniques, namely
SCREEN aad VISCREEN."for
preliminary estimates of air quality
impact. Minor code changes nave been
made to SCREEN (renamed
"SCREEN2f to enaun nasonable,
comparability wim. ISC2 (especially far
Hownweshcakuhtions). To better
appi
compliance
thatalbi
an to be
in PSD NAAQS analyses. Moieovet. the
GutdeUne is being codified tome Cage
of Federal Regulations far projections
associated win AQMAanalyses
(S5V11Z), analysis of lead
91.117K regional
(5 5L150X end praconstruction review,
of new end modified sources ($51.160).
Asproiwsed.EPAisnotinc}udtogto
the Guideline either a screening
tWhni* fittrmm nl Clf • .
pncunon or recommendations on the ..
use of regional scale models.
Alii
presented atthe Gfilt
modeling uuumniice and/or sohnritted
to Docket No. A-88-0*. an find to
Dodnt Cstaeoqr 1V-BL Abo. a.verhattm
is available a* Docket Bam 1V-*M. EPA
Whenever the comments
revealed any now infonnation or
suggested any alternative solutions,
such wen considered in EPA's final
action.
Mator issues raised by the
commenten. along with EPA responses.
an summarized below. Guidance and
editorial changes associated with the
resolution of these issues an adopted in
the appropriate sections of the
Guideline and an promulgated as
supplement B (1993) to the "Guideline
on Air Quality Models (Revised)" (1986)
(Docket ftesa V-B-1). See the ADDRESSES
Section of this Notice (above) for general
availability.
Althougn a more tintailitri summary of
the comments and EPA's responses an
contained in the aforementioned
response-to-comments document
(Docket Item V-C-1). the remainder of
this preambie section overview* the
primary Issues encountered by the
Agency during the public comment
period. This overview also serves to
explain me changes to the Guideline
from today'a action, and the main
policy concerns addressed
by the Agency.
changes being
•. In our view, ell of the
made reasonably
implement the mandates of the Clean
Air Act, and are in fact beneficial to
both SPA and the regulated community.
While modeling by its natun involves
approxiniatkiai besed on scientific
methodology, end entails utilization of
advanced technology as it evolves, EPA
ges ratpnnd to recent
a so that the
to be comprised of
the best and most proven of the
available modete and analytical
techsaejiies, as weU ea reflect reasonable
policy choices.
A. Coinxunr jsrmn MooaJs
iMedafcCTDMPLUS
believes these c
advances to the
Guideline continues
(Complex Tenato Model PLus
Akjorithma fat IfoataUe Situations)
Then was general support far the
proposal to adopt CTDMPLUS as a
refined complex terrain model.
However, them was a wide variety of
comments on various aspects of toe
modal, e.g» evaluation of CTDMPLUS
ISO i
drawn eoBelirslomn
of me model's
times far
DS with several
ooBcentoatioR
-------
£8818
/I Vbli 98/Na) 137. / Tuesday; July 2Qtocfaniousv " •' - "
B.MobUe Source Modeling at Signalized
1.CAL3QHC
Thie model Is used for estimating
carbon monoxide concentrations et
• signalind intersections. Public
"GQflUDflDiet COOwOOO tb&l iDA Uufil
intersection model evaluation study, on
which die proposed adoption of
CAL3QHC in supplement B was based,.
was flawed. The comments also contend
that die setoctton of dw supplement B
^i.i.»._.Ml|0tbemadt
- -»* -— ^_ .
evaluation to completed, utilising the
more recent New York City date base.
In response to these comments, EPA
reevduated the eight Intersection
models evaluated with the Illinois date
base with the New York City date base.
Using the MOBILE4 emissions model.
the models wen initially evaluated at
all six intersection sites in New York
City when date wen collected. The
MOBILE4.1 emissions model, an update
to MOBILE4, was then nleased. The
five models performing best using
MOBILE*, wen then evaluated using
MOBRE4.1 et the three intersection
sites in New York City with the highest
quality date. A statistical scoring
scheme was developed to determine the
best performing models. The evaluation
results showed CAL3QHC, TEXIN2, and
CALINE4 to be the best performing
models, with none of the three being
statistically superior in performance to
the others.
EPA points out, however, that
TEHN2 and CALINE4 contain the
outdated (mid-1970s) modal emission
factors. Since CAL3QHC performed as
well as TEXIN2 and CALINE4 and does
not contain the obsolete modal emission
factors, it is being selected as the
recommended intersection model for
inclusion in supplement B, as proposed.
However, since CALINE4 and TEXIN2
performed as well as CAL3QHC, the use
of these models is being allowed for
applications when then* use has already
been established at the time supplement
B is promulgated.
2. "Guideline for Modeling CO From
Roadway Intersections" (Draft)
Relatively minor public comments
wen received on receptor placement,
ranking criteria for intersections,
ambient temperature, persistence factor,
hot/cold starts, background levels and
wind direction, m response, the
^'Guideline for Modeling Carbon
Monoxide bom Roadway Intersections"
has been modified, as appropriate, to
reflect die commenters' concerns and
recommendations.
C: .Emissions and Dispersion Modeling
SvstemJEDMSj
Since no negative comments wen
received. EDMS has been identified, as
proposed, in the Guideline as a
recommended model in appendix A for
assessing air pollutant concentrations at
dvilian airports and military air bases.
D. Modeling Techniques for Air Pathway
Analyses
Commenters addressed a variety of
I
included
models to unconventiona or
intermittent sources, dense gas models.
and model accuracy. In some cases. EPA
has planned actions that an responsive
to the commenters' concerns. In others.
-------
Ml «<#%»£'>i9t» /
*W|*<
t
due to limitations of available
or alternative mmtmMna techniques on
which to base a different approach, the
changes to the Guideline have been '
implemented as originally proposed. As
to these and others, commenten wen
unable to provide specific
is general enough to apply to •
broad category of toxic pollutant
releases, which is why the model has .
bam included in appendix A. However,
supplement B now indicate* that 1SC2
hu bean recommended only for MOM
specific regulatory programs; ft is not
being generally recommended for all air
pathway analyses, as originally'
i algorithms in ISC2 for various
source types an ««*hnnm«iy being
reviewed and improvements released as
appropriate. Dense gas' models in the
public domain have been indicated as
available for use, but no one model la •
being required at this time. Perpubllc
famaaftt, SLAB and HGSYSTEM will
be proposed for addition to appendix B
•NPR;
>GAs DISpersion
Model) is being added to appendix Baa
proposed in the February 1091 NPR
Evaluating modal accuracy is a
I concern for EPA. However.
there is a lack of suitable data basea to
take such evaluations beyond their
current extant Nevertheless, wfaace^
Gausaian models an applied to
otionali
assessment thenisimle basis for
concern about ovenatimBtea of hearth
far risk
analysis for collection and use of on-afte
meteorological data (without i "
to the SRDT system). .. .
F. General Screening Technique* .
1. SCREEN
. EPA proposed to identify "Screening
Procedure* for Estimating the Air ?
Quality Impact of Stationary Sources"
with SCREEN as the recommended
screening technique in Guideline
Section 4.2.'A number of changes to
SCREEN ware suggested by public
commenters. As necessary, a number of
these changes have been made, through
minor code corrections, to ensure •
reasonable comparability with ISC2.
However, based on careful analyses of
other suggested changes (e.g.. those
involving flares and mixing height).
EPA has deddad to retain SCREEN
largely as proposed so as to keep intact
the philosophy of SCREEN at a
.conservative screening technique. Asa
result of the minor code corrections, this
technique has been renamed
"SCREEN2".
2.V1SCREEN
EPA proposed to identify "Workbook
for Plume Visual Impact Screening and
Analysis" with VTSCREEN as the
laGomflBenoBtt screening tecunioue tot
visibility assessments in Guideline,
section 7.2.4. Numerous detailed
comments were provided on VISCREEN
and the associated Workbook. However,
j0fulreview.lt is apparent that
i for longer or
demonstrated a tendency to
•i«*laWBB«Hi afltt r*fimj*MKtmttivn
avenging times.
E. Qn-S/te Meteorological Program
Guidance .
Since the close of the publiceMnmant
period, the evaluation supporting tno.
SRDT method was found to have been =••
btttdflnaBa
the method (sofh
r) and thus the
conclusions of that evaluation ate
suspect While public
generally supportive of the SRDT
method.it
rithdrewnfi
lately mutt be
ipplement B because
of this oversight Pending results of
additional evaluations; the SRDT •
methodmaybers-proposed'taafatun
supplemental rulemaking to augment
the Guideline. However, as proposed.-
"On**tt» Meteorological Program '
Guidance for Regulatory Modeling
Applications" (EPA-450/4-67-013}and
Regulatory Models (MPRMHEPA-600/
3HB0-043) an dted as the primary
source of supplemental guidance and
described therein may need to be
1 to coincide with the data bases
("objectives established for a
particular evaluation study. Therefore,
EPA has referenced the Protocol in
Guideline'Sections 3.2 and 10.1. as
proposed.
H. Alternate Model* in Appendix 8
Unlike appendix A of the Guideline,
which is a repository of summaries of
refined air quality models that are
"preferred" for specific applications,
appendix B contains summaries of other
refined models that may be considered
with a case-specific Justification. In the
February 1991 NPR. EPA solicited
comments on the inclusion of four
models in appendix B: SDM (Shoreline
Dispersion Model). WYNDvalley.
MESOPUFF Hand PLUVUE IL
Public comments concerned tr*+ hrk
of an
for
rformi
i evaluation
although data bases
for development and assessment of
MESOPUFF n or other long range
transport models wen not identified. In
>A has evaluated the performance
of MESOPUFF n and several other long
fact,
other long
range transport models using available
dan bases. Although MESOPUFF D was
found tobetb»t
thiaevml
arforming model
sdmEPA's
many of the c
misdirected, sought a level of detail that
decision to not propose the model for
listing in appendix A of the Guideline.
Furthermore, since public comments
Identifying concerns with the
B estimates of SO*
i and removal presented no
Justification for changes in
the model the policy of case-by-case
U inappropriate fw a screening analysis, application of- the model using agreed*
researched. As a result. EPA is not
However, to better support the
technique. EPA is working with the
National Park Service to provide
information on background visual
ranges and to i
development in
tmrbi^u*
egional hoe modenng
G. Method for Evaluating Modeb
EPA proposed to Include the
•TrotoeolfaEMernuningtheBest
Performing Model" ("Protocol") «s SD
adhmct to "Interim Procedures tat"
Evaluating Ata Quality Models" (EPA-
4SO/4-84-023) when a party seeks to
justify the use of an alternative model
for a site-spedfic application. Meet of
Regarding other models, no comments
specifically related to PLUVUE U were
received; comments about the proposed
inclusion of SDM and WYNDvalley in
appendix B of the Guideline were
generally favorable. EPA has added
SDM and WYNDvalley to appendix B of
the Guideline, as proposed: PLUVUE TJ
is already m appendix B. These three
models, along with MESUPUrY II and
its application protocol, have been
Identified, as proposed, as models
available for application on a case-by-
the
ts offered
IjVttejniUic
01 fwxiDuitytl
that
dealt with the degree <
EPA wiU permit in developing <
specific model evaluation protocols. "
This Issue-la addressed In the Protocol.
L indicates that specific i
ibesis in the following respective
parts of the Guideline: Section 8.2.9.
8.2.10,7.2.4. and 7.2.6. These models
an either unique to the specified
application or an at least as accurate as
other available models. However, due to
limitations of data bases for evaluating
the models, no further model
development or evaluation is feasible at
this time. Nor is mow detailed guidance
appropriate; case-specific consultation
with Regional Office* appears tn be the
most reasonable approach.
-------
38820* , F«b*d
/ VoL -M,- Mo. 137./ Tuesday. July 20.1993 7 Rules md Regulations
I. Supplementary Changes
1. Rational Office OnuHiHttiflr on VOC/
Source Modeling
«sth
Delved
NO.
No_
on this topic, md the Guideline reflects
the changes noted in the NPR.
2. Clarification of Modeling
f^uirements Applicable to PSD (NO*)
ConuneiinHs expTeised a desire far
modeling techniQues more nfiiwd dun
thaw propand to handle annual
avenge concentrations of N0» as they
Minn to PS) oomplianoB
damoajtittioac.Hawav8r.no practical
teduuqaas which daal with the axpttdt
us* of UAM (Urban Airshed Model) or
with animating long-tana avenges wore
identified. Therefore, tinea some
procedure is needed to treat NOi and
long-tana averages far PSD. the original
proposal, though Umfted. is being
maintained for inclusion in the
Guideline.
3. PM-10 Issues
No negative comments wen received
on the proposal to change leiareucae to
pattictttote matter so diet "PM-10"
replace* "ISP" (GuidetiDe Section*
7.24 and ilA3l.Othet Guideline
which itnonvnfmncaeto receptor
model* are already addneeed in the
manner; they requue no farther changae
or additions.
PSD NAAQS Analyses -
^^"'MnfBt^tf took ffiHaqHtffii to the wt
of allowable emisnone in modeling
analyses for PSD NAAQS. A variety of
alternatives was suggested far changing
Table 9-2 as proposed, which ranged
from the use of actual emissions to use
of techniques for statistically
approximating mniuinftT variability.
EPA maintains however that, once
permtoed. sources may OB
iMMiiv •llj*^M«iklA la^MM Mfe
rnnst be coosidaied In the
analyses.
modifying
.impacts and to
for in GuideuM Table 9-1 end thaV^
proposed Tabb 0-2. end have long
standing in past practice. EPA ie
suthoziiedbydwaeanAirActta
require A* use of allowable emissians.
Thus, no change to the proposed
guidance is being made, .
S. Deletion of ERTAQand MPSDM
PramAppendixB . -
No negative comnMBta
on the proposal to debit
models bom appendix B as reoueeted by
the models' dvmoper. These modeb
have been deleted, as proposed.
6. Updates to OCD
Nonegatii
ients
ra received
on this topic. This model has been
updated to reflect recant improvements
prepared by the Minerals ManagenAnt
Service, as proposed.
7. Updates to UAM and EKMA (OZIPP)
No negative comments were received
on the proposal to update EKMA
(OZIPP) to indttde the C&4V chemical
mechanism end guidm
with respect to UAM. there were no
comments on the use of the CB-JV
i; therefore, a version of UAM
with that chemical
•pacifically lecom mended in eppendn
A of the Guideline. Public i""'iiteiUi on
the "GtddeUne for Regulatory
Application of the Urban Airshed
Model" concerning nirh topics as data
base criteria, grid sin. boundary
conditions, and UAM
evaluation have been
addressed th
work group that
development A
oroughly
gh consultation with the
helped in its
on the
use of UAM m SIP development has
I^BBM* «««Hea%ai«BHwl ••%ji •MHueMfeeMM^ *.»__*
guidance has been referenced in the
GllfdlliilluL '
n« tut Aly
Quality Models" .
Several commentan opposed EPA's
the Guideline in the
for
would unduly Unit flexibility of Starts
and sources to use alteroative modeb,
data bases, end procedures far these
other SIP applications. As stated In Us
fuf OOAOnF eVOQeUliDB wBGDKUQQW (•tfK
should be applied to Stow
Implementation Pun (SIP) revisions for
existing sources and to new source
reviews* * *M. and this has always
been EPA policy. Use of the Guideline
rapnesolslong-staDxUQgEPA policy
and codification would not. in fact.
limit
fl«dbillty of Stales or industry
d«Mostratiow&ttSIPi.TheGuidalii
by its tonne, provides the flexibility
allow* the OH of modeb other t
those eat forth in i
U is appropriate to'doee. EPA believes
that the comprehensive use of the
Guideline under the other provisions
prnninteecnniiilemyini "
gnmted by Sections llfK*X2), l6S(e),
172.173,30l(aKD and 320 of the 1977
dean Air Act Amendments (42 U.S.C
74UHaH2), 747S(e), 7SQ2M * ft>). 7503.
760l(aKl) and 7620. respectively). The
dification therefore is being
I AS proposoQ. ui wdttf to
better facilitate this action, the
Guideline, as revised through
supplement B, will now be published as
appendix W to 40 CFR part Si.*
/. Other Topics
1. A Screening Technique for Point
Sources of Q» Precursors
Based on public support, •r""""''^
techniques for estimating VOC/NO.
i not been included in the Guideline
ot this time.
2. Usefulness of Regional Scale Models
to Regulatory Programs
No public comments on this topic
were received. Therefore, as proposed
by EPA. recommendations on the use of
regional scale modeb have not been
Included in the Guideline si this time.
JC AosocifQHa9OU3 Gonunfliiti
In addition to the topics described
received which were not specifically
solicited in the February 1991 NPR.
These comments pertained to the
following: (1) Industrial Source
Complex (1SC2) Model: (2) fugitive Dust
Model (FDMfc end (3) general modeling
guidance.
1. Industrial Source Complex Model
A wide range of comments were
presented on the adequacy of the
computational code in general and more
specifically on the downwash. area
source and deposition algorithms, to
respanis to some of these comments, it
should be noted that EPA has completed
a program to improve, the structure of
the code. This enhanced cede makes the
model much more usable, but dose not
rq,feuhif«j gm| dots
downwasn
d deposition
a wave
will be
thms, fa addition, a preprocessor
Mnieeas building orientation in
rith
it guidance
nineving
> of the computational burden.
Lack of acaviry algorithm in 1SC2 to
calculate downwash k also of concern
to EPA and is e high research priority.
but no inmiediete solution is
I
and is in accordance with lot authority
-------
Federal Register / VoL 58. No. 137 / Tuesday, July 20. 1993 / Rules' and Regulations 38821
t
Whan then is confusion to the
Guidaline about dowmnsh
calculations, clarifications have been .-
made. Other remarks about the
dowowuh calculations reflected
confusion on the part of the
commenterfs) or a lack of data on which
to base a bettor algorithm. Thus.no
further action to change downwash
calculations is planned at tKlf tine.
EPA shares the conunenten' concerns
about potential deficiencies in the area
source and deposition algorithms and is
evaluating these and alternative
schemes. If new algorithms are
identified for use, they will be proposed
for public review and comment before
being implemented for regulatory
prepared, the current algorithms in ISC2.
should continue to be used. as.
appropriate.
2. Fugitive Dust Model
Then wen several strong comments
in favor of adopting FDM in appendix
A of the Guideline as the recommended
model for sources of fugitive dust as it
relates to both PM-10 and airborne toxic
materials. Nevertheless, there has been
insufficient opportunity for public
comment on this model Thus, the
model algorithms will be considered in
a supplemental NPR,
3. General Modeling Guidance
Highly varied comment* and Agency
responses on other topics not addressed
criteria set forth to section 1 of the
Order for this determination an: (1)
Likelihood to have fn •"""•i effect on
the .economy of $100 million or more;
(2) likelihood to cause a major increase
to costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, State, or
local governments, or geographic ?
regions; or (3) likelihood to result to
significant advene effects on '
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, .or the ability
of United States-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises
to domestic or export markets.
This rule does not change the
proposal's conclusions regarding E.O.
12291, specifically that the regulation is
not "major" because it would result to
none of the adverse effects mentioned
above. This rule has been submitted to
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review under E.O.12291, as
required, and their written comments
and any EPA responses thereto will be
available as Docket Item IV-H-1 (see
in the February 1991
tuBinuirliod in Section 12 of the
"Summary of Public Comments and
EPA Responses on the Fifth Con'
on Air Quality Modeling: March 1991"
(Docket Hem V-C-1). The comments
deal with a wide range of topics
primarily rotated to management of
EPA's modeling guidance, to most
cases, the commenten seem to ham
misunderstood the way to which such
guidance is issued ana updated by the
Agency, or the commenten have made .
• inappropriate recommendations that an
not consistent with long-standing EPA
policies. As such, with one exception.
no action appears appropriate. That
exception has to do with determination
of PSD impacts to Class I areas; work is
underway on this topic and will be
subjected to public review and comment
when completed.
a J-a—t•» t•§ •alaWea. •*eMB.ee te^eCTieMfcfrel
A. Executive Order 12291
Under Executive Order (E.O.) 12291.
EPA is required to judge whether a
regulation is "major" and thenfon
subject to the requirement of a
regulatory impact analysis (RIA). The
S. Paperwork Reduction Act
This final rule does not contain any
information collection requirements
subject to review by OMB under the
Paperwork Reduction Act on I960,44
U.S.C. 3501 etieq.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 at see..) nquine EPA to
regulations on small business "entities".
Pursuant to the provisions of 5 U.S.C.
605(b), the Administrator hereby
certifies that the attached final rule will
not have a •%">BM«^* impact on •
substantial number of such entities.
This tide manly updates existing
40 CFR Parts 280 and 266
Air pollution control. Hazardous
waste.
Dated: June 21.1993.
Carol M. Browner.
deling analyses mandated by
Clean Air Act programs (eg., prevention
of significant deterioration, new source
review. SIP revisions) and imposes no
new regulatory burdens.
List of Subjects
40GRRPort5J
icticeand
ti
ol Carbon
procedun, Air i
monoxide. Hydrocarbons. Incorporation
by.reference, Intergovernmental
relations. Lead, Nitrogen dioxide.
Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting ~
and recordkeeptog requirements, Sulfur
40CFRPartU
Parts 51.52,260 and 266. chapter I.
title 40 of the Code of Federal
Regulations an amended as follows:
PART 81—REQUIREMENTS FOR
PREPARATION, ADOPTION, AND
suaunTAL OP IMPLEMENTATION
PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 51 is
revised to read as follows:
A*h*ritr: 42 U.S.C, 7410(«K«. 747S(e).
7502 (a) and (b), 7503.760l(aKD «u) 7620.
2. Section 51.46 is amended by
revising paragraph (b) and removing
paragraph (c) to read as follows:
MMAonalysIs: Protection of ek
(b) Unless alternative techniques an
approved under §51.63, such
concentrations shall be projected using
requirements to $ 51.112(a).
|81M (Amended)
3. In f 51.63, paragraph (a) is
amended by nmovtog "51.46,".
4. to § 51.112, paragraph (a) is
amended by removing the second
sentence and adding paragraphs (•)(!)
and (aK2) to read as follows:
jfwi** *ii
W* * "
. (1) The adequacy of a control strategy
«JHiH be demonstrated by means of
applicable air quality models, data
bases, and other requirements specified
to the appendix W of this part
Alr
Sulfur
Nitrogen
(Revised)" (1986). supplement A (1987)
and supplement B (1993)). The
Guideline tiff Its supplements (EPA *
Publication No. 450/2-7WJ27R) an
also far sale Dram the U.S. Department
Information Service. 5825 Port Royal
Road. Springfield. VA 22161.
(2) When an air quality model
specified to appendix W of this part
("Guideline on Air Quality Models
(Revised)" (1986). supplement A (1987)
and supplement B (1993)) Is
inappropriate, the model may be
modified or another model substituted.
Such a modification or substitution of a
modal may be made on a case-by-case
oasis or, when appropriate, on a generic
basis foe • specific state p'vgrirn.
Written approval of the Administrator
-------
38822 Federal Regiatar I Vol. 58, No. 137 / Tuesday, July 20, 1093 / Roles and Regu
ilatir
must Iw obtained for toy modification
or substitution. ID addition, use of a
modified or substituted model must be
subject to notice and opportunity for
public comment under procedures «et
forth in §51.102.
151.117 {Amended]
5. In S 51.117. paragraph (c)(l) ia
amended by adding toe phrase",
consistent with loquirements contained
in § 5l.ll2(aT immediately after "if
desired". Paragraph (cm ia amended
by adding the phrase ", consistent with
requirements contained in § 51.112(a)"
immediately after "for demonstration of
attainment". Paragraph (cX3) ia
amended by adding the phrase",
consistent with requirements contained
in S 51.112M" immediately after "for
the d
9. Psat Si to amended by adding
appendix W to reed aa followa:
Appendix W to Part 51-GoldaLbe«
Air Qaality Modele (Revised)
PJPA
027X1
EPA-4SO/2-7S-
Industry and control agendas hew* long
anpresseqa aeed tocoanalsteDcy in the
application of air quality models far
leguurtnry purposes. la ths 1977 OeaaAk
AOConjm. Dttdatad such oonksteney
and •ncouteasd the staadanlisanon of aodd
applications. The GoidelbM OB At Quality
Models wisfitttpaMtshed to April 1978 to
nodeb and pmrtdmi laUeMe far their use.
TttsauUallB*
ertimatiec the air <
uii
emission limits.
ThtocmtinuiiM development of i
qoaUtymodebin
periodic review and update of guidance on
UUNM t«rhn>que§, Pour prink*ry oc-gaing
•ctivitiM rnovide direct Input to Mviskiiw of
thi« madcliag guideline. Tha first U « sariei
of umutl EPA workshop! conducted for the
purpo w of ennuiag cansiftancy arid
PVQVlulZUIE CaeU*fiCBuOB iP UI0 ADDllCKuOIl Oi
mod«t*. Tha Mcond •ctivity. dincted toward
UM tnpfovanient of inodeUng ptocadttiet* !•
the coopeMtiTe sgreeaaot that BPA has with.
theictontlfirromnrun>tyr«ptM»ntedbyth«
Amartcsn Meteorological Society. This
agreement pi
procedures end ptopoeed tecfanitjun* and
sponton workshope on key technical isme*.
The third activity to the eotiritatiaa and
review of new model* feom (b» technical and
luer community. In the March 27. 1980
Federal KatMar. a praGadura was outlined
for the submlttal to BPA of prrwtely
developed model*. After extensive evaluation
and scientific review, these models, as we!)
as those made available by EPA. am
considered In recognition In this guideline.
The fourth activity U the extensive on-going
research effort* by EPA and other* In air
quality and nieteuielugMI modeling.
Based primarily on these sour activities,
rt.1. AW^.M^ ^A^jt«. nrtoV
"Guideline on Air Quality Models."
Although the text has been revised from the
W7» guide, the present content end topics
aie sunilar. As naosssasy, new sections and
topics are Included. BPA does not make
change* to the goidaaoa on a predetermined
ichenuia. put tathsr on an as Beaded betts*
EPA believes that revisions ta mis guideline
should be timely and responsiw to user
need* and thould Involve public
partlctpatioa to the f^eaaMt possible extent.
All utanchaagas to thegoMsace wUI be
propoMd and flnatoed fat tbereaarai
modellniaiiidsafiecaa'aiway* be obtained
from BPA1* Rational OBkas.
TeUaafOaeaaMls
JUsto/TaUat
I
2.0 Overview of Modal Use
2.1 SuitahOto of Models
2.2 Classes of Models -
hl*rf
3.0 *• nHiniMffrff Air
MBHB^^^^rii \MftJ^M^^ *
neenreo aeooanng
3.1.1 Discussion
3J Useof AtanenvaMoaek
3.2.1
3.3 Availability of Supplementary
Modalnf Guidance
3.3.1 The Modal Oaadnghousa
3.3.2 Regional MetaorotoaistaWodLihap*
4.0 Simr>le-TenainSatioaary*Source
Model*
4.1 Ducussion
4.2.2
5.0 Modal Ues la CoaiplaTeoaui"
5.1 -
SJL1
-------
/ VoL 58. No. 137 / Tuesday. July 20, 1993 / Rules and Regulations 38823
5.2.2 RefmedAaelyikalTecBBiquee
6.1 UUcuttion
«*l ModebfarOaon*
6.2J Model* far Carbon Monoxide
6.13 Models farNUroBBoDUndde
(Annual Avenge)
7.0 Other Model Requirement*
7.1 DJKUMton
7.2.1 Fugitive Dii*t/FugitiveBnils*ian*
7JJ Paniculate Matter
7.2.3 Uad
7.2.4 Visibility
7.2.5 «=""* «-t»"— «ifl «*•—•»«- «•>*
Height
7.2.8 Ung Range Transport (LRT)(U..
beyond SOkjn)
7.2.7 Modeling Guidance far Other
^-ft|**>B>Bt>*<1**" Pra^MB§
7.2.8 AirI>athwayAttatyM»(AirToxk*
and Haaardao* Waste)
8.0 General Modeling!
8.1 -
8.2
8J.1
8-2J Critical Receptor She*
8 A3 DtepeisianCoBffidents
BX2.4
8AS Phone Ris*
Appendix B to Appendix Wof Part M—
Sunmurtea of Alternative Air Quality
Model*
Appendix C lo Appendix W of Pert SI—
Example Alt Quality Analyst* OMcUitt
LIST OF TABLES
with sufficient spatial end
lemponl
It would be adventsgeon* to cetegorizs the
various regulatory program* end to apply •
dSSiffilieQ BWdal tO eacii proposed SOUfCS
needmgw*ly*t* under a.giv*
No.
4-1
5-1a
S-tb
5-2
5-3
•-8
9-3
i faf Selected App8-
csflora kt Sfenpto Tamln.
However, the diversity of the nation'*
topography and cUmate. and variation* in
souice configuration* and operating •
modeling '•cookbook.'* Them i* no one model
capable of properly addreetiag ell
rfvable tituationf aim within a broad
JbrCTSCREEN. ...._
UaMxlorCT8CREB«.
PrakMred Qpaona kx «• SHOBT»
LONQZ Convuew Codaa Whan
UMdhaSoaartnailoda.
Pratmd OpKora tor tha HTOM
Coda Whan Uaed in «
category such a*
Meteorological p
threat* to air quality
amenable toastnale
enocutadwith
standards are rarely
ermenU
Modal Einleelon Input Data tor PoM
Sourcaa.
(EiriMtana) tor PSO NAAOS Com-
tAui. cue-by-caa* aaalyti* and Judgment are
natpienuy reonired* A* modeling aDorl*
become mom complex, it i* incnatiaglty
important that (bey be directed by highly
competent individual* with a broad range of
experience and knowledge in air quality
meteorology. Further, they should be
coordinated doceiy with epecialittt in
emJMion* chetacteti«tic*,airmoaitoring«nd
datapmreeilng ThehKJgtnentof
exoerieaced meteorologUt* and analysts i*
8J.7 OrrrttatlcnalSettliDgi
8.2.9
8.2.10
Urbaay«uniaaniHcatfoB
I
8.2,11 CalibratiaB of Model*
9.0 Model tepot Data
9.1 SOUK* Data
9.1.1
9.1.2
fillet aWlvVtalitvnBl V^emilfl9iBMulfli •fa* IRulftw
to State Implementation Plan (SIP)
for existing source* end to new *n
wwlAMtt S induriifw nnveBtftft of
deterioration (PSDM It It Intended fir use by
EPA Region
The model that most accurately estimate*
i in the ana of interest!*
always sought However, it is dear tan tha
need* expressed by the State* and EPA
Regional Offices, by many industries and
delibaration* of Congress, that consistency in
the (election and application of model* and
databases should also be sought even In
case-by niompptDpriite utm
linthlsguida.Thisi*
dlscusaed at greater length in Section 3.0. u
all caac*. toe model applied to a given
rituation should be the one that provides the
i of atmoephectc
in tha ana of interest.
, deviations
Modah
H0WWOTe tO WWUW COaMiel „
from this guidashouldlwcsnfidty
documsntsd and mlly supportad.
dartflcatia* aftk* Intent of the guidance on
, jja^fc. tjmlr ffinttlf •»•> itMIIH BIS h'*"*
n^UanfaundtoUusMCCSptshleand witiTth*EPA Regional Meteoraloglstt to
-------
38824 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 137 / Tuesday, July 20, 1993 / Rules and Regulation*
copstitency to modeling galdmci and
to promote *%T ust of mon aocuiBte air
models and date bases. The
MMTW to nroiicw wittMHf
3.1
orgui(UlMnqulitmral>totlM
Regional Office* and workshop nports an
issued wim this clarifying mfamatton. to
addition, ftndinp fan on-going itstarch
. ntw model subrolttals, or results
model evaluations and applications
ly evaluated. Based on this
an
infefflMtfOfl ^^"fto in thg suidttQCt) nty bo
indicated.
All changes to this guidanot mutt fallow
T»friT»»n«fl '•qi'i'Tmtntf three 1h» 1MI4T11"*
is codified la Appendix W of put M. EPA
wiUttfomulgate proposed ana final rutes in
the Federal ttgMar to amend this
Appendix Aapte opportunity far public
conunani wiu also to provided far each
will also to awn anilaUt thmigh tbt
National Technical Information Service
(NTIS).
A wide nag* of topk« OB modtllag and
date taste an dUscuseedmu^nmaindtr of
this guideline. Chapter 2 gives an overview
ofinodels and their appropriate use. Qiepter
3 provides (pacific yM*m» oo tht net of
*>stsrnd" air queUty modtl* and on tbt
selectioo of alternative techru^i^ Chapters
4 through 7 provide ftoommtAdetions on
sfanple-ttrnunstetionsry SOUK* problems.
•miluUma. fif^ri M inuwiillfaw lajmtiji.LJ
far stiectsd retaliatory issue* an alto
addressed. Chapter • diacuMM IMUM
model U suitable far the evahiation of source
include: (l) Tnemtteorologlcal and
topographic complexities of tht ana; (2) tht
levefof detail and accuncy needed for tbt
analysis; (3) tht technical competence of
most undertaking such simulation modeling;
(4) the resources available; and (S) tht dteuT
and accuracy of tht data bast. Lt^tmistions
inventory, meteorological data, and av
quality date. Appropriate date should bt
available befan any attempt is made to apply
a model A modtl mat requires detailed,
precise, input data should not be used when
such date an unavailable. However.
assuming tbt date an
tht detail with wbtchamodel
spatial end temporal variations In
nisnbtr of individual "computational
alADfitmns" nay aocist* tacb with ttv own
snidflc applications. Whttttaehof tat
•JgDCithflU OUy AVm tIMI
to thin iodividuaiKy tut i.
tbt CRSTBR modtl and tbt RAM modtl an
commonly rtfamd to as individual modtls.
In bet, they an both variations of abasic
GOT tilati iBftflTi 1 01 majty cutt tht only vtal
diffmnca between models within the
difhrtnt chssts te tbt degree of detail
eonsldtnd in tht input or output data.
Gaussian modtls an tht most widely used
tachntquti far tstlmating tht Impact of
nonnacthra polhitants. Nnmtrkal models
tht
tbt ability to t*aluate tbt aourct impact and
to distinguiah tbt tfltcts of various control
Ah* quality modtls have bttn applied win
tht most accuracy or tht Itatt dtgnt of
uncertainty to simulationt of long term
manttwitfankttvtlyaimplt
modtu far — •. ••• n^,
that involve nactivt poUutants. but they
nquin inncn mon todansivt input date
basts and resources and thtrtcbn en not as
widely tppUtd. Sttttittcal or tmpiiical
technio^tsanrnqutntlytmpkiytdin .
undtrstendtog of tht physical and cbtmlnal
processes or lack of tht itqutetd data basts
makt tht use of a Gaussitn or anmtrical
modtl myactkaL Various sptdflc models
m thttt tnttt gantric typta an discussed in
this guUtUnt.
thtustofwindtunotlorodMr
modtls an tvallablt far such
tbtrm
inputs to inodiM tiiflliHlfiMi joufoii
mrteototogteal and background air quality
data. Chaptar 10 conn uwuncaitainty In
•• bettor
Models an highly sptdalind tools.
Compttant and txptritnetd pttttmntl an aa
ttftrptisj ptaftiMuHIt to tht ttiootasJul
application ofsinultUan modtls. Tbt nttd
•V •p^CUUIiti m GnttCU IRWtt HDtt IBOni
models an ustd or the ana
|
situations, such at building. Mmin or stack
HUp
teat
jillftijtjm in MwimlAw ^
to sncn situations
can bf VN&il to tht iMnbtonr dtdsioa*
-
used in tfT***»ng source Impact and in
AfModixWtoWCrljattSl (tbt
"Guldtllnt on Air Quality Modtls
(Revised)") Itself contains three appendices:
A. B. andC Thus, when ntmnceUmadt
to "appendix A" in Out document, it refers
to the appendix A to appendix W to 40 CFR
tSl.AppendiceeBaadCani '
y. or with
inappropriately chosen date, can lead to
Apptndix A contains summaries of nfintd
airq^tynwd(4*theten>Kfentd"for
specific applicationr, bom EPA model* and
models developed by otbar* an tuchidtd.
nfintd model* that may bt considered with
a cast tptctftc justification. Apptndix C
contains a checklist of requinmente far an air
quality analysis.
24 Overview sf Model Uee
BPptKit Of UHt MPJCCTBP>ii <
•tnli|y«
Ttoi99OV&fa&u&tfuM^byv*at
•— ^»,^_ti*— Mwwblal V*MW aWlfi*llf tJaTPaMiftlnBl ffm
I depend on tbt natun of Ou model
lite complexity, tht detail of tbt data
bas*vtrMdlmcultyoftiheapplic*tioa,andtht
t ntt leffol of jvcpKuM fej^iilnd* Tnt
i of owttpoww'
tMtitw tHrycmp rf fffurotf to t
M limited to a fswaquan
.If physical modeling is availablt
andltearmUcabUirydtniaiistrattd,itmaybe
tht beet technlqut. A discussion of physical
modeling is beyond the scope of this guide.
ThtffApnhllcstion'^uideUnefarFhiid
Modeling of Atmospheric Oifiusioa,"«
t
9 % f-tBMvJaf £*f ^Midlifttf&tttmt fff atffwfalfaT
In addition to the various classes of
model*, then tn two levels of
JDatT
lUQ
UlO IHf InpOfftCOt BCfcQM IB tflO
UMOf tlBOuU fDV*lfp6CiuC
•nuyvto* HowvWt It ihould n rtco^nttani
that under tomtttts of physical
ttchniqutathatpiovlatconstrvativt
ttttmatet of tht air quality impact of a
specific tomcat or aouioa cattgoiy. Thttt an
screening technkruts or scrttnlng models.
rott of such techniques is to
thtnttdoftuTtbtrmondtteiltd
Tat
ta ^iiisM^ifMi Af ••!
lay bt appropnatt. Thus,
thmbctonshould
not bad
modeling far those toutctt mat ctotxiy will
•mi) si*aMi
-------
/ Vol. 50, No. 137 / TnMdBjr, July 20, 1999 / Rules and Regulation* 38823
Thai
analytical
required. Thae, the
auaontafe
•nd mdM tqnt dttb mi p
w$ult they pravide a
llHIflt ih^HWftltf^Mw A
of loufQe inipicl and tfav
ing
i1 tnen an tituatiom wnaia
ara pcaettcally and
only riabkopttoct for
__^ *^m—~j^ f^ •••Ml* mmm*^ Mvtt
HfT mpacL in men Raee§» an
attempt ihould be made to acquire or
improve the neoeitaty data bates and to
develop apprapriato analytical todmlque*. .
Thif Mction recommend! refined modeling
technique* that ere prefaned forme in
regulatory air quality pimraiui The ttatut of
model* developed by BPA, aa wall a* thoaa
submitted to EPA for review and possible
tndmion in thU gujdance. la dtocmted. The
foriDdhridualGafaaaBdpTOfldae .
prefared models an not appUcabto. Two
Discussion
EPA has developed approximately io
models suitable far regulatory apnlication.
Mom than 20 additional models wan
submitted by private developers far i
inclusion in the guideline.'
models have all Seen organ
categories of use* rural, wtm I
complex, reactive pollutants^ mobile sources,
complex terrain, visibility, and long range
transport. They an iiiidergclng an intensive
avaniBtioii by category. The evaluation
exercises BAM include statistical measures of
model performance in comparison with
measured air quality data as suggested by the
American Meteorological Society" and.
when possible, pear scientific reviews.".".**
aaJt. _— __ -I— —1- •nilal •• fsu.IBB,jl *M ..^_A.^__
WAOD • ffirfB/T DMMMI if IDIOUI w pprmnu
better thin otnan is • gNu cttogoiy. ft I*
reeoniitKniiwo nit tppiionoD In tlwt ntnoncy
99 at plwHiml HUNwl ftUQ lutOu IB AppOBQDC
A. If no one modal is found to clearly
peiUmii better through the evaluation
exercise, then the preferred model listed la
appendix A Is selected on the basis of other
factors such as past use, public familiarity,
coat or resource requirements, and
availability. No farther evaluation of •
6.Th» derrioper anst be wtllios to
the mod* mlbbto to men M ranoubb
co«t or nuto ttarallcM* for pidilictatM
tbfou^l thw Nitfonel Teduiicsl InRiiiiiBtioii
Sarrice; the model cnmot be i
I
* and periodic Ragtanal
workthopc, an alao briefly
InaUraralataryaBaiyeee.eepedanylf
other than pretend model* are ealacta"
uee. aeriy dWrion. among Ragloaal
tag. Stale and local control aaandai.
4tpprapricto» wt Rin0u Lttno Mnufftv. tn
osthv dvtl bttM to b* HMO* ooonSiiy
techniques to be applied and the overall
technical aproaA prior to tteaemal
That
use of an err quality checklist, such as
presented m appendix C, and the preparation
of a written protocol help to keep
H should not be construed Out the
preferred models Identified hen an to be
others or mat they an the only modus
the iiunfai m this guideline. The ">~<»'« not
"spaciflcaliy rauuminanoad for uea fat a;
particular cataajory ara tiirniiiiii I n" *ii
appendix B. These models should be
compared witn maasoraol air ojnltrjr data
whan they ara vaadfar regulatory
The solicitation of new refinedmodela
prindplei>wdwhidt mora reliably estimate
EPA to he continoouv Models that en
•tuWnattalli in MJTnnrtrtjumf"* TeVlMk thai HOBialimft
Ilimil lii Iha Faileiel laghler nntlra nf
March MM (48 FR 20157)* will be evaluated
M submitted, Theee raqunmanUanc
1. The model must be ccmpulariaad and
suitable far usa on a variety of computer
apaemc models is needed to]
consistency-m mftn^ aalecnott; and
application.-
The 1880 solkttadonof new or.difhreat
2. The modal must be documented ia a
user's guide which Identifies th*
WlAtlfcamlmVBBt&B'U AaT tlfcaft IIVWlmu\ jlaa^al VIHIllfan^EmVHll
ajidTtroanmooaraimgchaiactariatkaata
level of detaU comparable tothat available
fc»^jipBy,iMy *mfp**t**ma^A IJMMMM| *a^ri *™
Single Source iCRSTER] ModeL
3. The model must be accompanied by a
that.
evaav
i by which i
availabbuu^guideUsMLTheteisapressint
need for the development of modek for a
wide range of t-eajulamryapplfcatiocts.
Rtflntd mmfrh mat man mtittWy
•tmnlato >K» rfM^-al •ml rfu^iileal pnaeaag.
m the atmosp^snandAat more reliably
estimate pollutant ooucantiattom an *^
camplele teat dan sat including inpt
parameters and output nsulta. The test dam
must be included in the uear's s
as provided in computar*nadab
4. The model must be ueafel to
user*, e.g,. State air pollution
agenda*, far specific eta-quail
problema. Such users should be ablate
operate flu ooDtputar
available-
S. The model documentation rnnat teclmia.
other wall-established analytical techniques.
MIVMJB, IDV UlUUgf r^*m** DV |IIU|H tVtaUJ.
The «v«luation procasi will include t
^^f^^fiin^^iffn of Ce^fanical ^oent, in
acootdanoe with the above six items
including the practicality of the mode! for
use in ongoing regulatory programs. Eac
l will als
riate
model will also be subjected to a _
performance' evaioauon for an appropriat
data base and to a peer scientific review.
Models for wide use (not Just an isolated
case!) found to perform better, based on an
evaluation for the same data bases used to
evaluate models in appendix A. will be
proposed far inclusion as pictured models in
future guideline revisions.
3.1.2 Recommendations
Appendix A identifies refined models that
are preferred for use in regulatory
applications. If a model Is required for a
particular application, the user should select
a model from that appendix. These models
mayte used without a formal demonstration
of applicability a* long a* they ere used a*
I hi each model summary of
appendix A. Purther recommendations for
the application of these models to specific
source probwns an found bi subsequent
•actions of this guideline.
If changes an made to a preferred model
without affecting the concentration estimates.
the pnfcrredrtatus of the model b
do not aflatt uumamliaUona an those made
to enable use of a different computer.or those
that affect only the format or avenging time
of the model results. However, when any
changee an made, the Regional
Administrator should require a test
example todemonstrete that the __
A pwfcwwf KdOQx9l flnoula D9 opflited wf In
the options listed in appendix A as
"Kecommandatkms for Regulatory Use." If
otnaT'Optlonf an exercised, the imwlel is no
longer "preferred." Any other modification to
a preferred model mat would result in a
change in tin concentration estimates
likewise alters its status as a preferred modeL
Uaa of the model most than be justified on
JJ 1/seo/AftanwtiveWodeJs
3.2.1 Discussion Selection of the best
techniques for each individual air quality
analysis U ahwys encouraged, but the
selection should be done in a consistent
A staple listing of models in this
guide
chieve that consistency
nor can it naceasarily provide the best model
far ell possible situations. An EPA document.
"Interim Procedures far Evaluating Air
Quality Models".!*.'* ba. been prepared to
assist m developing a consistent approach
when justifying the nee of other than the
preferred modeling techniques recommended
in this guide. An alternative to be considered
to the performance measures contained
-------
38826 Federal Ragjrter / VoL 58. No. 137 / Tuesday. July 20. 1993 / Rule* and Regulations
nuking on the acceptability of an alternative
model far a given regulatory application. The
documents contain procedures far
conducting both the technical evaluation of
the model and the field last or performance
evaluation." - *
This section discusses the UM of alternate
modeling techniques and defines three
situations when alternative models may to
used.
3.2.2 Recommendations. Determination
of acceptability of a model to a Regional
Office responsibility. When the Regional
Administrator finds that an alternative model
to mon appropriate than a pretend model.
that model may be used subject to the
recommendations below. This finding will
normally result from a determination that (1)
a preferred air quality modal to not' .
appropriate far the particular application; or
(2) a mon appropriate model or analytical
procedun to available and to applicable.
An alternative model should be evaluated
from both a theoretical and a performance
perspective bsfon it to selected for use. Then
an three separata conditions under which
such a model will normally be approved far
UM: CD If a demonstration can be made that
the model produces coocantntio
followed, as
land
Implementation of en evaluation protocol
which is acceptable to both
particular regulatory
evaluate the uw of m
and leyilaHMi industry ii an tmpoftant
element in such an evaluation.
When no appendix A model is applicable
to the modeling proUem, en alternative
applicable to the problem on a theorettcaK
basis, and - • ••• • .. . . ,
2. The data beeee which ere necessary to
perform the analysis are available and
adequate, and • -
3a. Performance evahiattons of the model
la similar circumstances hive chows, that the
model to not biased toward imdereetimatea.
•or
3b. After consultation with the EPA
Regional OfBce. a second model to selected
•• • bcMiiiM of nvmm point tot •• •- ;
p0iBufii)aUtcB ttra too intnin pncMUftt **/
. action. The
also consider and
nodeling technique*
submitted u support of any ngulttory
action. Additional responsibuities an: (1)
Review piopueed action far consistency with
agency policy. (2) determine technical
adequacy: and (3) make recommend.
3.3.2
34.2.1
the technique or data base.
agthetechni
Regional M»
i ijt^aufion
EPA conducts an
annual in-houM workshop far the purpose of
among Regional Office modeling specialists.
EPA I
Headquarter
eh modeling i
modeling i
stiff
the pnpOMd model parfocmi batter than the
equivalent to the estii
obtained using a
preferred model; (2) if a statistical
performance evaluation has been conducted
using measured air quality data and the
JJ ArailabUitr of Supphnmtaiy Modeling
Guidance
The Regional Administrator has the
authority to select models that an ,"•
appropriate for UM in a given situation.
However, there to a need far as
programs. A titDuneiy of thetosoai i
at previous workshops was issued in IMi as
"Regional Workshops on Air Quality .
Mealing: A Summary Report." "That
npoit Clarified piooBduns not t\Nn ifif illy
defkned in the 1978 guideline and was issued
to ensun the consistent interpretation of
model nqulmnents from Region to Region.
Similar workshops far the purpose of
clarifying guideline procedures or providing.
detailed Instructions far the use of those
procedures «re anticipated in the future.
3.3.2.2 JtocomnMiMfotfom. The Regional
Office should always be consulted far
Information and guidance concerning
nsuits of that evaluation
alternative model part
i hi
r far the
application '*w »i^""i*yib^t
appendix A; and oTuthen to no pnfared
model far the specific application out a
refined model to needed to satisfy regulatory
requirements. Any one of these, three separate
conditions may warrant UM of an alternative
model Some known alternative models that
an applicable far selected situations an
contained in appendix B. However, hiriuiten
then does not infsr any unique status
relative to other alternative models that an
being or will be developed in the futun.
Equivalency to established by
demonstrating that the maximum or highest.
second highest comeiiUattons an within 2
percent of the estimatM obtained from the
prftwinu modaH. Tbt option to sbow
«quivtl«jcyiiint«ul«iutiiiiip.« :i~ -
domonstnttoiiof«co0pubilit)rfcvui -
•ItoteUkivs nooBi Uut It so HMny*id0iUcAl
MenUcal) to a pntend model that tt can be
teeated far prartkial purposss as tPSpnfciTSQ
modeL Two percent was Mlected as the basto
far eqiii valency since It to a rough
approxtmaHnn of the PTeutlcBi that HMA C3aM
I increments an oftheNAAQ^ far SQa,U. .
thediftevnceinconcentntionsmatto
Judged to be significant However.
notwithstanding this demonstration, me of
models that an not equivalent »sy hs used
when one of the two other conditions
The procedures sad techniques far
•ifafclti* >!•• m*t •••••Mii*^ irf • uMii
i and consistency in modeling
decisions to fastand among the various
Regional Offices and the States. To satisfy
that need. EPA established the Model
QearingaouM and abo holds periodic
•fcshopswithheadqusrta ~ '
modeling guidance, and to ensun that the air
quality model user has available the latest
noct up^o-drti policy UM pnoMiitw.
Office and State i
3.3.1 The Model CUar«ghouM ,
3J.1.1 Bteussfco.'rheModel
aearjnghouM to the single EPA fecal point
far gsviatr of air Quality slnmlittoH modals
I far nMmspednc regulatory
4.1
Simple terrain, SB used hen. to considered
to be an ens when tsroin maluns an all
fcwsrbvetovBtiw than the top of the stack
Of tho >OUrot(<) fat qOMtiQQt Tat IDOOj>il
uMd ID the ejr quality impact analy»toof
t
i and its operation an found in
««— .Jiinnsn ••»• *•*M—*—* a^l^ei«l«a«tuM*e*eM
1D0 flOCDDHDEe MOQW UMTIflgDOiUV*
I Plan."* Three primary functions
(1) Review of decisions propoeed by EPA
l Offices on the UM of modeling
*
from 1 hour to an annual
Regional O
timftpii|
-------
Federal
/ VoL SB, No. 137 /Tuesday. July 20. 1993 / Rules end Regulations 38827
ld be peM to whrtberlhe
I
Sl-wOWO W'ClSfl.SuMd
accordance with Section «.2.f. The
olhiutology of the ana should be studied to
-help define the wont-ease meteorological
fjondltton*. Agreement should be reached
between the model user and the reviewing
authority on the choice of the screening
model for each analysis, and on the input
data as welt as me ultimate use of the results.
4.2.2 Refined Analytical Techniques
Table 4-1 list* preferred models far
selected applications. The** pretend
models should be used for me sources, land
use categories and averaging tunas indicated
in the table. A brief description of each of
these models is faund in appendix A. Abo
listed in that appendix an the model input
requirements, the standard options that
should be selected when running the
program and output options.
When m.vi.ii.«|i for compliance with short
term NAAQS and PSD Increments Is of
primary concern, the short term models
listed in Table 4-1 may also be used to
When modeling far sources far which long
term standards alone an applicable (a-g*.
lead], men the fang term models should be
used.
TLu oQ-ovmion front inng tann to snort
t-smicracmtraUoD average* by any •
transformation technique I* not acceptable in
regulatory applications.
TABLE 4-1.—PREFERRED MODECS
FOR SELECTED APPLICATIONS IN
SIMPLE TERRAIN
TABLE 4-1.—PREFERRED MODELS
FOR SELECTED APPUCATIPNS ip
SIMPLE TERRAM—Continued
s
Buoyant In-
duaWaJ
Lkw
Source*.
LandUa*
Rural
UoM*
BLP
?
'Several of .Mae models contain option*
*AAd*A* ^tt**M* t^tmim .ash »-•—• ^*tm**+*m*m**t ag^.—
wnion •sow vwm n iw nwcnsytMO- ror
ISCST2 can be wbMttuted for
and\ (Kf+filti*, V not ktenacal.
son utifMtn obo^rtiid. StaN-fty, toe
a point touro-i **pics*o.x MPTER wt* urtow
' " .MalMM.hB.lB.,.,,4 tnj O.A.U UHv.*.,..*.**, •»
COaWVetofat 10 V)S) USW SJ1Q
•TkatoTtora [^11^.11.1
ior unTiicn VMy WMV o^toM-Miy
^McW proolwnt
liiii.^i.ia m£ ^^^If^
oownwajan, pwvc
tuch M
a aourcaa, etc.
M only • law
•M only • law BOURM In an urban am am
to bo modeled. RAM ahouW be mad.
84 KUdelUae in Caasplex Terrain
5.1 Itecusrion
Forth*
taraunia
Start Tann (La.,
1-24 noun):
Single Souroe
MuWpla
Source.
Compttcatad
Soureaa*.
Buoyant m-
dustrtal
Una
Soureaa.
montwy.aae-
aonal or an-
nual):
Single Source
Multiple
Source..
OompKcatad
Soureaa a.
LandUaa
Rural
Urban
Rural
Urban
Rural/Urban
Rural
Rural
Rural
RumMMan
RAM
MPTER
ISCST2
BLP
height of the stack being modeled. Cnrnplax '
terrain disp*rsinti model* an normally
applied to steuonary aource* of pollutant*
.nichasSOiandparaculates.
A major outcome Cram the EPA Complex
Tenein Model Development pro|ect haa been
the pubUcatton of a nflned diipataton modal
[CTDM) suitable far regulatory application to
pluine impaction as*e*sm.iBti IB oomplax
terrain." Although CTDM as originally
produced was only appUcabla to thoaa hours
chsnctariaed as neutnl or stahia, a CM-tttputer
code far all stability oanditions.,
CTDMPLUS,» together wtth a oar's guide.**
and on-dte metaorologicel and terrain data
processors,*** is now available. Moreover.
CTSCREBN.M.*) a version of CTDMPLUS that
does not require on-site nieiaaralogical data
inputs, I* also available as a screening
technique.
The methods ducuaaed in thta section
should be considered in two categories; (I)
Screening technique*, and (2) the refined
oU.ro.«.Bonnwxl.ii.CrDMPUJS.di.Kii.J**d
below and listed in Appendix A.
Contimwd tarmvemants In ability to
yy^ffitsfly HrWwl phiiitf ^itp"1**^1*8 *f
*gftfamnn9Jcb
-------
JBdaral KagtoUr / Hei St. Na 137 7 Tuesday, July 20, 19M / Rales
-------
Federal
/ VoL 58, No. 137 / Tuesday, July 20, 1993 / Rules and Regulations 38829
speed el other heights. RTDM uses wind
s
and the critical dMdt
e heigh
iportW
(vet
to calculate dilutioiL-RtDMtnats wind
direction as constant wim height
RTDM makes use of the "critical dividing
sbeamlinetv concept and thus treaty phnne
interactions with terrain quite differently
from other models such as SHORTZ and
COMPLEX L The plume height nlative to the
critical dividing streamline determines
whether the plume impacts the terrain, or is
lifted up and over the terrain. The receptor
spacing to identify maximum impact
concentrations is quite critical depending on
the location of the plume la the vertical.
Analysis of the expected plume height
relative to the height of the critical dividing
streamline should be performed far differing
meteorological conditions Is order to help
develop an apfttfwftriaw array of receptors*
Then it Is advisable to model the ana twice
according to me suggestions in section 5.2.
S.2.1.6 flestrMtons. For screening
Technique. COMPLEX I or 8TDM, a sector
122V>* should not be allowed.
Full ground raaWCtioQ ihouid uvrayv w UMQ
in the Valley Screening Technique and
COMPLEX L
5.2.2 Refined Analytical Techniques
When the results of the screening analysis
demonstrate a possible violation of NAAOjS
or the controlling PSD 1
refined analysis may need to to conducted.
rain Dispersion Model
r Unstable Situations
) is a refined air pualirjr nxidel
that is preferred far use in all stability
CTDMPLUS is a sequential moffitiiat1*
requires five input Bias: (1) General program
specifications; (2) a terrain data file; (3) a
receptor file; (4) a surface meteorologlcel data
file; and (5) a user created meteonlogicBl
profile data file. Two optional Input files
consist of hourly emissions parameters and a
file containing upper air data from
rawinsonde data files, ex. a National .
Climatic Data Center TD-6201 file, unless
then ere no hours categorised as unstable in
the record. The nodal description and user
instructions an contained in Volume 1 of the
User's Guide.* Sepeirteiwblkattoiisa*
ilnii iHin llui Imialn laiium eseia sjileii 1
in Port ff of tin same article.** The
siae of the CTDMPLUS executable file OH a
ptnoul cooipittvr is ippvoxiBUttiT 360K
bytes. The model produces hourly avenge
concentrations of stable pollutants, Le.,
chemical tnnsfarination or decay of species
and settling/deposition an not simulated. To
obtain concentration avenges comspo
totheNAAQS,ex.3-orJ
averages, the user must execute a
postpreceteoi program such as CHAVG.»
CTDMPLUS is applicable to all receptors on
terrain elevations above stack lop. However,
the model contains no •lgnH*hm« for
simulating building downwash or the mixing
or ledicuUtiott found in cavity tones in the
lee of a hilL The path taken by a plume
CTDMPLUS does not explicitly simulate
calm meteorological periods, and for those -
situations the user should fallow the
guidance hi Section 9.3.4. The user should
fallow the recommendations in the User's
Guide under General Program Specifications
for (1) Selecting mixed layer heights, (2)
setting minimum scalar wind speed to 1 m/
s, and (3) scaling wind direction with height
dose coordination with the Regional Office
Is essential to insun a consistent, technically
sound application of this model
The performance of CTDMPLUS is greatly
improved by the use off
• veraU
ete
ologk
from several levels up to plume height
However, due to the vast range of source-
Ant/of a technical article* le a discussion
of the model and ib) preprocessors; the
terrain, detailed requirements far
ipjtMrokiglcil noDitonitt u auiptxxt of
relbWiuiryssausmgCTriMIUISdiauMto
determined on a case-by-case basis. The
fallowing general guidance should be
considered in the development of a
BfttaMfwOffiCU DtOUltOfilU pffOtOCOl mXf
regulatory applications of CTDMPLUS end
reviewed In detail by the Regional Office
before Initiating any monitoring. As
appropriate, the On-Site Meteorological
Program Guidance document** should br
consulted far specific guidance on siting
laud exposure of eanson, etc, Ae
more experience Is gained with the iiionfll ID
a variety of circumstances, mom specific *
.guidance may be developed.
Site specific meteorological data an
critfCad to dispwioii noQHioi ID CTtnplffK
teminand. consequently, the inetentnlngical
meteorological files (referred to as surface,
profile, enoViaWhl files) m needed tO fUB
CTDMf'LUS in a regulatory mode.
The surface file ii created by the
meteorological preprocessor (MBTPRO)«
beted on on-site measurements or estimates
of solar iDd/or net radiation, cloud cover ud
ceiling, and the mixed layer height These
data muted in METPRO to calculate the
various surface layer scaling parameters
(roughness length, friction velocity, and
Monin-ObuUtov length) which an needed to
CUD the model. All of the user input* required
far the surface file an bued either on surface
observations or on measunnwnu at or below
10m.
The profile data file if prepared by the user
with on-elte nMsurementf (from at least
three levels) of wind speed, wind direction.
turbulence, and potential temperature. These
measurement* should be obtained up to the
representative plume height!») of interest
(Le.. the plume heights) under those
conditions important to the determination of
the design concentration). The representative
plume helghtts) of Interest should be
determined "*"^fl an appropriate complex
terrain screening procedure (e.g., CTSCREEN)
nvmltoting/modeling protocol The necessary
meteorological measurements should be
obtained from an appropriately sited
meteorological tower augmented by SODAR
if the representative plume heightd) of -
interest exceed 100m. The meteorological
tower need not exceed the lesser of the
representative plume height of interest (the
highest phune height if there is more than
one plume height of interest) or 100m.
Locating towers on nearby terrain to obtain
slack height or plume height measurements
far use to profiles by CTDMPLUS should be
avoided unless it can clearly be demonstrated
that such measurement* would be
idittau effecting the
representative of c
plume.
The rawin file is created by a second
meteorological preprocessor (READ62) a*
based on NWS (National Weather Service)
upper air da.ta.-The rawin file is used in
CTDMPLUS to calculate vertical potential
temperatun gradients for use in estimating
plume penetration hi unstable conditions.
The representativeness of the off-site NWS
upper air data should be evaluated OB a case-
by^ase basis.
In the absence of an appropriate refined
model, screening results may need to be used
to determine air quality impact and/or
TABLE 5-la.—NEUTRAL/STABLE METEOROLOGICAL MATRIX FOR CTSCREEN
Spaefllc Values
U(n*)
1J> 2.0
0.3 0.7S
0.08 0.15 OJO
0.01 0.02 0.036
3.0 4.0
S.O
0.75
WO
(1) If U £ 2 nve and ov s 0.3 nVa, then Mude ow - 0.04 nv*.
(2) M o. « 0.78 nva and U i &0 nva. flisn AOttz Is MM to 10.01 KAn.
-------
/ 3M. 58.
427 1
fifly 2t. 4W3 / Rules mil
TABLE 5-lb.—UMSTABLE/DONVECHVE MersMOLoeiOL-MATRIX EORCKOBEBN
.' Vadabto
4)910 tagaanMl twajMiaftB* 'QndMnl
1.0 £0
0:1 :03
-10 --3D
3.0
05
-90
4.0 5.0
0.9h l.Oh 1.311
When h * taoakt height
TABLE5-^.--PB6FEBMD OPttONS^Ofl THE 9HORTZAXJWGZ CUMHUILH CODES WHEN USEB IN A
MOW
ISwHGhB .
I Switch .17
1,.
XRY _ ...
NS.VS.TRQ4BHORTZ)
(pared* JtatvelK) ~~.
AtPHA
SlQEPO.
P(wtndjmahi)
BonoH
•MUS.-MS.1
States o».
Oft* Cnmrcucvoe (detsrt): If i
sioxra
<
-tar HMO*.
TAB1£ 5-3.—WCFERRED OPTIONS FOR THE flTTDMCunffuibB CODE WHEN USED w ASOREENINQ MODE
PRC01-48S
PR004 ..._-_.
PR006 —
PROM™
PROW —
PROW ....
pfl.oia3
PR020 .
PROZ2
PR023
021; wd 024.
1CWE
UM.UT
TERCOR
row
(SHEAR
IREFL
IHORIZ
SECTOR
f 1
.
«PS;
em 0.11.^0,12. HJ4. at.
I
^^^ ^
PwlW suftect ntactfoit is used.
Sector *vMgbn.
wntosions w*
S.J TOfCIUUCNt
Mndtilt itiMMi
applicable to polluta
mobile «ourcea, e.g..
monoxide (GO) end nitrogen dioxide (NOi). uae a phutochemleal diaper»ion model i*
WhenstatiooaiyfOutcefotCXDaodNOjaTe enoouraged to do ao. Bxpaianca with and
of concern, the leader Umtend to aactiont evaluationaof the Urban Atoned Medvl
4 and 5.
Aujuai»>aaem.j*idt)uiii
iated with area* with significant ozone problem* and available that support the man sojAirttcefeitt
(O»), carbon which has niffldent tesourcM and-dataie anMtytteri-pireJhiTet ltowe»m.jgpiritad
-------
/ Vol. 58, No. 137 / Tuesday, July 20, 1993 / Rules and Regulations 38831
models («j.t EKMA) flit the gap brtnaan
maw sophisticated photarhemfa
models end praportional (rollback) modeling
proosdun if the avaUanio data bases an •"
insufficient far refined dispersion modeling
Mtxfab fa siieiilng tto impact of carbon
monoxide emissions an nil Ji J far • number
of different purposes, e*. to evaluate the
effects of point SOtUOes.GlXflgeelflKl
intersection* end highways, •* wall M the
cmnutotfae effect on ambient CX)
concentration* of ell sources of CO in en
Models far
For analyzing CX) impact* at roadway
Intersection*, users should fellow die
procedures In tto "Guideline for Modeling
Carbon Monoxide from Roadway '
Intersections'*.*4 Tto nooininended model
te such analyses is CAL3QKC** This model
combines CALINE3 (already in Appendix A)
with a traffic model to cafcul»t> «ti«v« an*
queues that occur at signi
h man accurate estimate can
be obtabied by (^| caiouatiiig tne annual
avenge oancentntfons of NO. with an ufban
model, and (2) converting these estimates to
NOj concentrations based on a spatialiy
averaged NOi/NO. annual ratio determined
from an existing air quality monitoring
In areas when tto use of aither TE30N2 or
CAUNE*. has pnvtousry bean established. H»
ww Oaty continue. The) capability exift$ far
th«90 laMtMcttoB models ti>lN uttd in vithar
To demoA«traw oompllanoi with NO> PSD
increments in tvtm aVMt, aniBioiis Icvni
major and ouaartoaroa* should be included
in the modeling «&ft}ysU. Point «ndi
Nitvofra oxictof m tnctivv MO tbo
t cuub iDiititiii to QW pMHudMn
r of inott
coocam in TOM of high oxona
concantivtian*. Unlm niitabto
photochemical dlspanioD model* an
auumptioni regarding the convanion of NO
to NOi are raquiiad whaa modaUng Site- .
specific convanion ftcbn nay to
developed. If •Ua-ipadfle coavmion fact*
are aot'available or photecharolcil modali
are not UMd. NOi modeling ahouid to
coMideted only • Mna&ing procadura.
i detcritod In refarance 34; a
i approach may to considemd on a
caie-by-cata tetto. Tto latest Tercion of the
MOBILE (mobile source emission factor)
model, should, to med nr OTiiiiton* Input to
intersection model*. •
For aualy *•§ of highways ttoivctatisad by
uninterrupted tnfk flow*. CALINE3 is
' ' »iaieml*»ian* Input Bfom.fte
latest Terdon of the MOBILE modal.
Thei
of the MOBILE i
ted model fewbn
6.2.1 Modabfor
Tto Uibaa Alntod Modal (UAM) «* la
areawtde CO analyee* Is RAM or Urban
Airshed Model (UAMh see appendix A.
InformatioD on SIP development and
leojunvfBeots for using mese HioiieTS>^jiii ov
found in wfcunCM 34,96, V and M.
Where point •ootces of OO are oft
source emissions should to modeled as
discussed above. If mobile source emissions
ambient NOi concentration*, they should te
modeled as ana source*. When modeled as
ana sources, mobile source emissions should
to assumed uniform over tto sntin highway
link and allocated to each ana source grid
tquan based on tto portion of highway link
within each grid square. If localized anas of
high concentrations an likely, then mobile
sources should to modeled as lint sources
with tto pnftmd model ISCLT2.
In situations when then an sufficient
hydrocarbons available to significantly •
enhance tto rate of NO to NOt conversion,
tto trmi*mrt*fl"t implicit in the Osoae
Limiting Proosdun may nc
Man refined technique**!]
may not to appropriate
M to
t
pollutant modeling apcilcatlnssi Invohrusj
entin urban anas* To aasun proper
execution of this numerical asodol, usen
mu*t satisfy tto extensive input data
requirements for tto model as listed te
appendix A and tto usen guide. User* ere -
also referred ftrtha "Guideline te Regulatory
Application of the Urban Alntod Model""
foredfiUoiialdann^iiniMntsand '
procedurec tot opentiiit Ode model.
Tto enpirlcal model. aty-spedBc
EKMA.I*. »-*» has limited applicability fat
consult tto appropriate Kajtooal OfBce on a
this modeling technique.
Appendix B<
they should to tnaftea using tto scree&uisi
and refined techiftme* described ta Section
4orSoftheGatdeth)e.
6.2.3 Models Ibrhntne^Dfoxide (Annual
Avenge)
A three-bend screening approach Is.
recomnieaded to obtaJa annual avenge
estimates of NOtnoaa point souioasior New
alysis, inchtdim} 9SO. and
considered on rcsteby caia ba*i»«nd
agmanunt with the reviewing authority
should to obtained. Such ternnlmwi should
coniiderlDdlvldusJouantiUMOfNOtnd
NOt •»»«««i«M1 atmospheric transport and
models that may to applied oo a <
basis for pnotoctomical or reactive poUukat
mdudii>gii«iltHayeTedti«)ac(ory mJila.
that are avaUahle nmy to osed If shown to
a total conversion of NO toNOv
dispersion* and etinosptoffc I
of NO to NOi. Where it is available site-
specific data on tto conversion of NO lo NOj
may to used. Photochemical dispersion
models Jf used te other pollutants in tto
area, may also to applied to tto NO,
prOvlein.
7.0 Other I
sophitdcsaed tcnpnlar isclbrtes analao '
often required. Because tto uvpat data an not
uirfverselly amiable an4 stadia* tocollect .
such data an vary neoufo* tntaaawa, then
an only limited arahiatlnns 1st 1
Forthoi
b. 2nd level screen: Apply tto<
I imitlag Method"! in lha aitmial tW\
estimate obtained in (a) above i
npneentative average ana
conceiiuation. If tto nsuH to stffl
the NAAQS, anoVor PSD IncnnMi
men refined Oaone Lbnittng MeAhod in tto
3rd level screen should to applied.
e. 3rd level screen: Apply tto OaaM
This sectJoB covers thoae case* where
specific techniques have been developed far
special regulatory program*. Most of tto
programs have, or will have when fully •
developed, separate guidance documents that
cover the program and a discussion of tto
tools that an needed. Tto following
documents, when they an available. No
attempt has toon maoa to provida a
discussion of aacB topic since
wen designed te do
stationary sources of VOCaodNO..
te permitting or other regula
KJ*l user should *x^"*Tylf *h
tto year or multt-yaar psriod. Us» •
repreeentative hourly NO, backgsoundaiHi
osone levels in tto calcuOM. - .
In •Mtitin
be UMd M ft pnlimiaMiy
of NO»
tiutv TUs MCtfioD will odoef^o
Ortor Federal
.dtp*
have also
Mmg approaches far
NAAQS fa mulUpte minor
minor poiat. area and mobile
their own regulatory or other requirements
Anaoous^ofthisutttouine-vonmM
manual Issued by tto US. Department of
' ------ .-Afr
Regional Office on tto
Propcttkmal Wlback/farwerd) moriatine.
is not an acceptable procedunte evahiatiag
ozone control strategiee.
i should to estimated t
I atom then added to'tto fasyact of
thataUrXXisernittedlnttofoasiofNO.
and to use a modal from appendix A te .
nonnactlve pollutants In osamata-NOa • - -
' AJtnongh such ngnUtory
nquinrnents and fnanual* may have come
about because of H»A rules or standards, tto
lofsuchngiuationsandtto
use of thanmodetim techniques is under the
jurisdiction of BBS agency issuing tto manual
Ttonaadtoaanaaai
greater thaa 50km (the
-------
38832 Federal Ragistor / Vol. 58, No. 137 / Tuesday, July 20, 1993 / Rules and Regulations
which EPA considers most Gaussian modais
applicable) is an important oBsaspadally
when floiisidafinsj tha a0ects oom secondaiy
pollutant*, thirortunately. modais submitted
to EPA have not as yet undergone sufBdant
'field evaluation to ba fiH'H'iimffienojed mr
general use. Existing data bases torn field
studies at mssoecate end ton* range transport
distances an limited in detail This
limitation is a result of tha expense to
perform tha field studies required to verify
and improve maaoscale andlong range
transport modais. Particularly important and
sparse an meteorological dan adequate far
a^nenting three dimensional wind field*.
Application of models to complicated terrain
compounds the difficulty. EPA has
Due to the dUBculLnahire of characterizing
and modeling higltivs dust and fugitive
It
proposed, jHocedun be cieand by the ..
appropriate Ragianal Offio* for ties specific
•UuaiuiB LAluMithj jBM^jaUiM awdfcT I*
7.L2 Psrticulate Matter
icuUte matter NAAQS. „
. i July 1,1987(52 PR 2463*).
i oiilyptrtlclas with an aerodynamic
diameter lass than or equal to a nomiaal 10
mioomatsts (PM-10). EPA ha* also proposed
n4-10maiioticepubU*bed
1969 (5*FR 41218).
onOdobarS,
data. The evaluation results an
discussed IB dip document. "Evaluation of
in. eection 4 an also appUobkto PM-10 and
• toiaUM pVDCJM. It If ItGBBBNeraMl UUt
Than arm mtial nnilatoiY prapnnu iar
whidi air pathway analyd* prootdum and
modeling techniquM
or pollutant decay not be ueed a* a
te putfcle removaL Cooaenrattvv
amimptlnm iriitrti itnimt illini inmiiiiel nr
Pionoitional modala (loiiback/mTwaraimay
tach tedmtoaee ata used la eaajHin JVm with
lacaptemooalma,
7.13 Laad
Taa air quality analyeat mqubad for lead
implamentation plane an ghnn in $5 51.83.
Si.M and 51.85 of 40 CPR part St. Sections
51.83 and 81.85 requin the use of a modiaed
rollback model at •minimum todamonslnte
attainment of the lead air quality standard
btttOauH of a dispanion model is the
piatimd approach. Section 51*83 miiiins
uia analysis of an antin uiban ana if the
meesund lead cupcauUation i& the
uibeaised ma exceeds a quarterly (tbiee
month) avantv of 4.0 jta/m*. Section 51.84
nquins the use of a dispanioa model to
demonstrate attainment of the had air quality
standard around specified teed point sources.
For other anas reporting a violation of the
lead standaxd. S S1.85 require* an analysis of
the area in the vicinity of the monitor
repotting the violation. The NAAQS far laad
is a quartetty (three month) e*anw. thus
requiring the uia of modeling tecnntque* flat
canpfDvida lonsj'tam conoanU4tlon
The SIP should contain an air quality
analysis to determine the maximum quarterly
die basis of many analytical
is contirniiiig to evaluate the perfar
a number of proprietary and public domain
emission nleesee. Until EPA completes its
evaluation. U is i
specific models i
guideline.
Rsiionsl scale models am used by EPA to
oxnwop sUid flViuuttai itttkiBaU poUcy wd
assist Stan and local control agendas. Two
such modais an tha Ratfonal Qxidant Modal
(ROM) iai.ia.ma tnd tht Bagtonal Arid
Deposition Modal (RADM).*** Due to the
lava) of resource* required to apply these
modala, it is not envisioned mat ngional
seals modala will ba used dinctry in most
model appUcatioo*.,.
BOD BaVfOaf WeU
point MKifOM, «cfa w •melbn.gMoUiM
•ddlthv pltntfi tic. ForthflM npilcitloDf
tb« ISC modri to pwfat»d, •!«• UM iwxUl
en iwomnttndad far PM-10 and large
paitfdaa. Howarar, whan poatibla. partick
a. parti
than-
maybe
U located hi complicated tarraln or It subject
ASM ivnuatuikl J'lttMaaitlf* atlflgU^IMjaeTlai Sk i
CPMJU) or RAMsto^bsused. <
ureas of small psrticlas. For murce-speRlftc
alysss of compUcatad sources, tha ISCa
mJL» i_ m^t^^^A UA •••.••I mmf HIM llll.«li.lil
ioai is pTaiarno. rroujuiiaincoironannaQ
secondary ^odata .....m^cwithar
•pvdflc Hnrtefw by to0 >pptDpriit> Rf0oui
Una
oootiol itostf.Bs|£
pOMlUtt tfas9 UsN of IVCV|.rtOtT
B.iOd..il§>*,«*('padspai.i.ftca..lyl
•y be needed.
also be instilled on a
(saa Sections 7 £4 and 8V2.10).
AsanBidtoaiaeesingthatmpacton
^f., jsjaaejlffy jrf
IK Laad
Plan*."«« and "Updated
on Approval and Prnmulgatioii
• - Ptans.-«t,houldbe
Visibility
Tut vtytDJHty iMUHttOaM w pft.ffffffiiiiHfif
_ . _^^— . sJM^sj^MT.Hffll ftf
110isV»ailable.
-------
/ VoL 58, No. 137 / Tuaaday, July 20. 1993 / Rnlet tad Regulation* 38833
aJL._ JM"j —•" ^—^^^—^ ^^ »aW» ^j^ft^tfii.^
UMBBBCi Ol iHrw fJMIlUapi ••» lauw «*HBUiiy
manBPA
U>Connee*".«i In IMS. EPA laiiimlgalart
Federal Implementation Plan* MTTJ) far
states without approved viaibittty provision*
in thrtr SIP*. A matter!^ plan
established at {MM of the FlS7
to (1) datamtliM if •
ooeur, and (2) idntify the aMidal to b> oMd
to letting an «nlwton Omit If Iba Oan I
. --- "%. ___ ..«- -^ ________ •. ^ _____ -».-».- A^^ -f-l-
p W Um^nVIIVlI (IDDIHnP URT TPTT
to anen ibe air anallQr Impact ofraleaiei af
tooQCi and luunlom wa
VISCKEBN, I* contained intheBPA
> b> ufffd to
poU^ial inractof apImMof.3p.Kili.Mi
•ml^aw iv tptdfic tEMtpoit and
dispmion CTWftttottf tf • ^j^^
rafinad model should to selected la
conwltatton with the SPA Regional OHIoi
and the i " ~ ......
u nquind to wctfOB 3^}.
Tois pfooraon uui ttw tnodiilt •woctM tot
nun ihould INI dftMBuxwd n cmsuitvnm
with tha BPA RtgtanalOffici and ttw ^
•pprapriata F«dnalJUDdManag0r(FLM}.
WfiUa thv ultfnuui dartikip OB whathar a
dan I ana I* adno^tActKl It A»
Kiponiiblltty oTtba pamttnof antiMHlly* flw
FLM hat an tflhniatlvt ntpaaSOKtf to
protect air quality related fahiaf that may be
•Acted.
If LRT it detannlaad to ba impcntant. thaa
than
on «
dueto
i walMafinad nenmily buoyant toxic/
i am available.
Sanaa! ragulauay [augiaim wttata BPA
have developed nodvUng tochnkjua* and
guidance for conducaiig air pathway
aaalytae at noted In nfmacn 118-12*.
ISCZfcfmtthebHitafthemodeKoc
pracedunt for Or pathway analyiat of many
of then ngulctory programs and. wnera
identifiad, is appiopfiate for obtaining
refined ambieat oaacentiatloa estimates of
A to thi* Guideli
tain* additional
nwdelbrncBptm at
SO km should be obtained.
lifted la
. who is responsible far determining i
then i* an advene efbct by a plume on a
danlana.
PLUVUE D, listed In Appendix B. may be
applied on a ceaa-by-caae basis when refined
plume visibility evaluations an needed.
Plume visibility models have bean evaluated
against several data *ets.«.«
7.2J Good Engineeting Practice Stack
Height
Theji«e of stack height credit in ansae of
CoodBngnaarmg Practice (wi stack height
orcredittesultingmni ' -
DMdedAddltlanel
thi* model is contained in the EPA
"A Modeling Protocol For Applying
MBSQPUPP n to Long Range Transport
models appropriate for obtaining refined
estimate! of continuous ah- toxic release*
from traditional sauroai. Appendix B
contain* models that may be used on a case-
by-cave basis for obtaining refined estimates
of demar-tbin-ajr faitemtittant gaseous
wleaies. e^.. DEGADB; '» «ji inanre far the
use of such modelsU also available.!"
Many ait toxics models nquin input of
chemical properties and/or chemical
engineaiag variables in order to
pete to dispeBSon in tha
coveted by EPA regulation*, tike
should consult the appropriate Federal or
_- - - - - *•*- - -^«J-
I
of amiraion UmMattoH by 40CTR 91.118 a«d
40 CHt 51.164. Tba dtflnltloni of GBP Mad
height and disparate tachniqiM a»
contained la 40 CPU 81.100. Ntathodt and
rocadurw far nuking tn« •ppmpiiat* (tacfc
*
nfaence 132 is one source of
datai. In addidon. BPA has numeral*
other animates of air tonic amisafaaa The
BtgtCTiaJ "fff^ f^'M1 "T <^-*nft)rf far
guldnnne oa apptopiiata emission attimartng
procedure* and any nncerUintie* that may ba
and 40.
oa* m
46. 47, 48,
The Oftkore and Coastal Dispersion (OCD|
modal in wai developed by the Minerals
Management Service and to fecammended far
- - - tfromoflrhore
an found to be last than the
byBPA'*
cap
OCD modal It net recommended for nee in
Ruing a number of dUfarent issues not
eoralicitiy cuvaiad In o&ar sorfions of this
*My or wake eflacta due to
the nearby bnUdlng structure* cbould ba
detamtoed. Detailed downwash screenmg
prooadnns'. far both the cavity and waka
region* should ba followed. If i
. SomcM located on or fast mknd of
lource*. SomcM located on or {oftinJand o
a ahoraUna whan nnnigation is anecktd
should ba treated m i
contains algorithms faT
calculations nd ihould ba
additional in
Pratt
deal of
ID0
System (EDMS) i»-was deveteped by the
Federal Aviation AdnihittUathiu and tha
United States Afr Porce and la i
t of j
describing tha cavity and wake i
7.2.S Long Range Tnaeport(LRT)(Le..
beyond SOkm)
Section I65(e| of tbeOaan Air Act i
that suspaded stgnificant mnada oa PSD
Class I anas ba deter
is the BjefaldJatance to which most <
analysee may show mat Clan I anas may ba
far estimati&g tha cnmulatiw efbct of
change* in Aircraft operations,] '
and mobile souroe emission* on i
concantratiou. It is not intended far PSD,
SIP, or other regulatory air quality analyse*
of pout or mobile SOUIOM at or peripheral to
aiiport property mat an I ' '
gold*. Tha topics covered ben an not
specific to any oae pragiam or modeling i
but an comnam-to nearly all modeling
analyses. •
6.2.1 Design Cuncanlfattone
8.2.1.1 Dftign Concentration* for Criteria
Pollutants with Dstonnimstic SlttRoonlff. AB
airottaUtyanalysUfarSO2rCO,Pb.andNOj
Is nqufted to detannine if tbeeoone will (1)
cause a viahtfoDOf tha NAAQS,or (2) causa
or contribute toairquaUtydeterioimtioh
gnatM tha tha spedfted alkmahla PSD
Incratoenk For the former, background
concentntton (see Section 9.2) should be
added to the estimated impact of the i
to detemnfle tho daeign coocenlratluu. For
HMI latteTf tha desii^D GonoenBation indnuss
Impact nom all Increment cuiiiuming
other than i
with analyse*, a i
chapter 4. 5. or 6 ahould be i
7.24 Air Pathway Anarym (AkfTogoceaad
«7helPA
46).
a*U
Modeling is becoming aa Inoaaabigly
hnportani tool far regulatory ccertrol agendas
If the air quanty analyses an conducted
, , —| „ — .| • a ^^&^M^—Jk**^tf^l S^o^Mft Jk^tm
using tna peimu otmanoRiiogicai tnpn< oara
m jflfnRiandad In aactton. 9.3.^^ ia*g., S years
of NWS data or 1 yearofsHe-sgeciflc data),
highest, aaoond*hlghast short tarm •
whichever It comtolUng, should be oaad to
imnltationstoassest
-------
38834 FBdersJ R«gte«r / Vol. 56. No. 137 / Tuesday. July 20. 1993 / Rules and Regulation*
compliance with the NAAQS ud to
determine PSD increments.
When tuffichmt sMd representative1 data
MM lor IMS than a 5-year period from •
nearby NWS site, or when on-stte dat%have
bean collected for tew than • full contii
yeei. or when it has been determined that the
on^ fete may not be temporally
representative. then the highest
concentration estimate should be considered
the design value. This ii because the length
of the data record may bt too shot to assure
that the conditions producing want-cat*
estimates have bam adequately sampled. The
pled
the
highest value U than a fumigate far t
coocentntioa that i*aot to be exceeded more
than once per year (the wording of the
deterministic standard*}. Also, the highest
concratntioii should be ueed whenever
selected worst specifically applies
to the use of techniques such as outlined in
"Screening Procedure* for Estimating the All
Quality Impact of Stationary Souices.
Revised^" Specific guidance far CO may be
found in the "Guideline fat Modeling Carbon
Monoxide from Roadway Intersection*"."
• U the controlling concentration is en
•annual average value and multiple years of
data Ion-site or NWS) an used, then the
design value is the highest of the annual
averages calculated for the individual years.
If the controlling concentration Is a quarterly
resolution is indicated by t
factors.
B.X3 Dispersion Coefficients
Gaussian model* used In moat applications
should employ dispersion coefficients
consistent with those contained In the
preferred models In Appendix A. Factors
such at averaging time, urban/rural
surroundings, and type of source (point vl
line) nay dictate the selection of specific
coefficients. Generally, coefficients used in
appendix A models are identical to. or at
tout based on. PasqulU-Gitosd coefficients ••
la rural areas and McHroyPootor"
OOnBCMDtS In UltMHH kWMft.
ItajMTch is conlimiing towigd ti»
agvuopoMQt of flMUKNv to dttinniM
transitional plume rise period, gradual plume
rise is not generally ncammended far use.
Then en two exceptions when the use of
gradual plume rise is appropriate: (1) In
determine close-in impacts; (2) when
calculating the effects of building wakes. The
building wake algorithm in the ISCZ modal
incorporates and automatically (La..
internally} exercises the gradual plume rise
calculations If the building wake t»
calculated to aflect the phone for any hour,
gradual plume rise It also mad to downwind
dispsrston calculations to the distance of
final plume rise, after which final plume rise
avenge and i
i years an used, then the
be considered the iiBflgn value.
As long a period of record as possible
should be used in making estimates to
determine design values and PSD
increments. If monthanl year of site*
specific data is availabto.it should be used.
8.2.1.2 Duifn Owicmirutioity for Crfterlo
PoWutont* with Expected Exceettaau
Standard*. Specific instructioas for the
criteria pollutants with vjqjecleu itTiMfffinflfr
standards, none and PM-10, are contained
in special guidance documents for the
preparation of SOP* lor mow pollutants.** M*
For alt SIP revisions the user should check •
with the Regional Office to obtain the most
recent guidance documents and policy
mymqimde. ponpffnfo'ff tfw pollutant t&
question.
8.U Critical Receptor Sites
Receptor sites for refined modeling should
be utilised m sufficient deteil to estimate the
method to date has proved to be widely
'applicable. Thus, direct measurement, as
well Mother dispersion coefficients related
to distance and stability, may be used la
Gaussian modeling only if e demonstration
can be made that such parameters an more
applicable and accurate far the given
situation tiun are algorithms contained la the-
• --..-^gaMjgi JUJlllillsl
Buoyancy-Induced dispersion (BID), as
identified by PisquUl,** Is Included m the
preferred model* tad should be used whan
buoyant sources. &|» *B"e Involving fuel
combuittflft* aw involved.
ft.24 StabUltyCategortos
ThePaaoullI approacb tocuttUylag
stability is genenliy noulnd in all pnfcrnd
models lAppeadbt A). The Pasqulll method,
as modified by Turner.** was developed far
uw with commonly
___ ***-
wtin
poociy cutisrtfuctM. tticift wut wiivi t*M ntlo
of the stack exit velocity to wind speed is
smalL An algorithm developed by Briggs
(Henna. Mat}*' is the recommended
technique far this situation and is fauad in
that POlIll SOUfi^pniUI'M eBOOby*case basis.
For a given model application when
stablUtycategotiH ante bail* for ntecting
dispersion coefficients, bom e, and o, should
bft detafnuAN fron the) sane etejplllty
category. "Split sigmes" In that instance an
not nmrmnemlail
Ssctor averaging, which eliminates the o>
tean. Is i^neralty acceptable only »
determine long term averages, sucb as
seasonal or annual, and when the
meteorological Input data an statistically
summarised as In the STAR summaries.
Sector avenging to, however, commonly
acceptable m complex tsmia ecnaning
HtttlUlflft! *
j^DVUH^wB.,
PhuneRiee
from site-specific studies can be used to
deftnea-haU-lifc-tobeusedinaGaussiu
model with any travel time, or in any
application, if appropriate documentation is
provided. Such conversion fcctors for
pollutant half-liii should not be used with
- Complete conversion of NO to NO* should
be assumed far all travel time when simple
scnening techniques an used to model point
source emissions of nitrogen flyfrfoti If a
Gaussian model Is used, and date are
Method *• to lecommeoded. In, refined
analyses, case-by case conversion rates baaed
o& technical stndioa appcoprie.te to the site In
id. The use of mon
t
soi
hutifiedfor
Use of mo
only on a
idoe considered
cue by case basis with proper
ation of applicability. These an
generally regional models not designed far
the evaluation of individual sources but used
secial pmmee as
should be considered on a i
Slnc«)thenUinsufficleHtlafamationto
Identiff aad ouantify dlspmsloii during ttur
which an an
mtegial part of tiM visibility model itself and
ft.2.7 Gravitational Settling and Deposition
An "tnllnt^ hllH*V ffr«"M bt UtM} ftfl
i of tool suspended parttculate
-------
/ Voi 58. No. ,137 / TUMday, July 20. 1993 / Rides and Regulations 38835
t
decay
be directly Included In a
if either is
tonandneirtheebonltneof
i of water. This cenaJbcl both -
individual plumes and area-wide emissions,
a significant factor. At least one preferred
model (ISO contains settling and deposition
fgg ueg when
particuUte matter sources can be quantified
end settling and deposition an problems.
B.2.SJ Urban/Rural CUssiflcatian
The selection of either rural or urban
dispersion coefficient* in a specific
application should follow one of the
nfoceduns mesjtited by Irwin M anil Bnffly
described below. These include a land use
classification procedun or a population
baled procedure to determine whether the
character of an area is primarily urban or
rural
Und Use Procedure (DOessify the land
use within the total ana. A* circumscribed
by a 3km radius circle about the source using
the meteorological land use typing scheme
proposed by Auereo- (2) if land use types II,
12, Cl, R2, and rtteccount far SO percent or
more of A*, use urban dispersion coefficients;
otherwise, use appropriate rural dispersion
coefficients.
Population Density Procedure: (1) Compute
ue average population density, p per square
kilometeTwith A. as defined above; (2) If ft
is greater lhanTSO people/km', UM urban
occur from a source or sources with nil
stacks located on or fust inland of a
shoreline, this should be addressed in the air
quality modeling analysis. The Shoreline
Dispersion Model (SDM) listed in Appenoix
B may be applied on a case by csie basis
when air quality estimates under shoreline
fumigation conditions en needed. ***
Information on the results of SPA's
evaluation of this model together with other
coastal fumigation models may be found in
reference 134. Selection of the epprop
model for application* where shonUi
I Of CODCcVB UHMlld D*9
determined in consultation with the Regional
Office.
8.2.10
Stagnation conditions are chancterixjed by
calm or vary low wind speeds, and variable
wind directions. These stagnant
meteorological conditions may persist for
seven! hours to several days. During
stagnation conditions, the dispersion, of air
pollutants, especially those from low-level
Wbenstagn
leading to relatively high ground-
Mis such >
appropriate rural dispersion
Of the two methods the land use procedure
side
definitive. Population
density should be used with caution and
should not be applied to highly
industrialised areas where the p
density may be low and thus a rani
classification would be indicated, hut the
vea Is sufficiently built-up so that the urban
lajid use criteria would be satisfied, m this
case, the classification should already be
"urban" and urban dispersion parameters
should be used.
Sources located in an ana defined as urban
should be modeled using urban dispersion
found to occur, they should be addressed in
.the air quality modeling analysis.
WYNDvaUey. listed In appendix B. may be
applied on a cese-by-casebesis far stagnation
periods of 24 hours or longer in valley-type
situations. Caution should be exercised when-
applying the model to elevated point source*.
User* should consult with the appropriate
Regional Office prior to regulatory
application of WYNDvaUey.
iU.ll Calibration of Models
parameter*. Source* located in i
as runl should be modeled using the rural
dispersion parameters. For analyses of whole
urban complexes, the entire area should be
modeled as an urban region if most of the
sources an located In areas classified as
urban.
8.2.9 Fumigation
Fumigation occurs when a plume (or
multiple plumes) is emitted Into a stable
Calibration of kngtenn multi-source
models has been a widely usedIpncedure
even ^""tf1 the limitations Imposed by
statistical theory on the nliabiltty of the
calibration process for long term estimate
layer of air and that layer is i
. d either through
connective tnnsfcr of nesjt pom the eurfsce
rnixe&to the ground*
or because of auvecUon toleesstanis)
usually rather short-lived at aajven receptor.
an, however, scnenlng pumeduiee (see
"Screening Procedures tor ******at**j the Air
Quality Impact of Stationary Sources" »•) that
nuybeussdtoappnudmetetbe
an well known.*' In some case*, when a
more accurate model is not available,
calibration may be the beet alternative far
improving thet tcconcy of tin MUiutM
CQDCUltntkHU MMM wf OOQtZOl itTltfJfly
evaluations.
Calibration of short term models is not
BentssieRor and mlsundAfBtudug. TjBsn
have been attempt* by some to compere sbi
eventby-event bests and then to calibrate a
model with results of that comparison. This
approach is eeteiely 1 hutted by uncertainties
hi Both tmirce ami mrtsnrnlmtcal dtfr end
therefore it is olrlViuU to precisely estimate
rtaintte* make calibration of short I
(data available should always be
I for use In modeling analyses.
i can vary widely depending
on the source data or meteorological data
used. Input data an a malar source of
inconsistencies in any modeling analysis.
This section attempts to minimise the
uncertainty associated with data base
selection and use by identifying requirements
for data used in modeling. A checklist of
input data requirements for modeling
analyses is included as appendix C More
specific data requirements and the format
required for the Individual models are '
described in detail in the users' guide for
each model.
9.1' Source Data
9.1.1 Discussion
Source* of pollut ints can be classified a*
point, line and area/volume sources. Point
sources an defined in terms of sice and may
vary between regulatory programs. The line
sources most frequently considered ere
roadways and streets along which there an
well-defined movements of motor vehicles,
but they may be lines of roof vents or stacks
such as in aluminum refineries. Area and
volume sources an often collections, of a
multitude of minor sources with individually
small emissions that an impractical to
consider as separate point or line sources.
Large area source* en typically mated as a
grid network of square areas, with pollutant
emrtfffrr"* distributed uniformly within each
grid square.
Emission factors an compiled in an EPA
publication commonly known as AP-42;•»
an indication of the quality and amoont of
data on which many of the factors an based
is also provided. Other information
concerning emissions is available in EPA
publications relating to specific source
categories. The Regional Office should be
consulted to determine appropriate source
definitions and for guidance concerning the
techniques for modeling the various source
9.1.3 Recommendations
For point source applications the load or
operating condition that causes maximum
ground-level concentrations should be
established. As a minimum, the source ;
should be modeled using the design capacity
(100 percent wad). If* source operates at
greater than design capacity for periods that
could result to violations of the standards or
PSD increments, this toad* should be
modeled. Where the source operates at
substantially toss than design capacity, and
the changes to the stack parameters
associated with the operating conditions
could lead to higher ground level
concentrations, loads such as SO percent and
73 percent of capacity should also be
modeled. A range of operating conditions
models ofquestionabk benefit Therefore,
the
ingte
ultsobta
Ktfrl
M Medel
Data bases and nUted procedures for
siilttllmsltilleV IfAfJMtA
which may nmil in ems
an not coosUend to be a aeneal
ttMtil^TherpnenUrifaeuJdiMMbt-
ate the null of
m
IB ,
PnTCB^HBV OaRBeWtMOsV It tteVy O*>
"
-------
J4836 .Fe)dnT*l OagiiteT / Vol. 58. No. 137 / Tiwaday, July 20. 1903 / Rules sud Regulation*
Should be
in screening analyses;
the load causing the highest concentration, in
addition to the desUnued.should be
included In refined modeling The following
example far a power plant U typical of the
Wad of data on source characteristics and,
o'perificg conditions that may be needed
Generally, input data reoukemenls for air
quality models necessitate the use of metric
uHtts; where English units are common far
engineering usage, a conversion to metric Is
required.
,. pint hnouL The connection schema
between boilers and stacks, and the distance
and direction between stacks, building
parameters (length, width, height, location
and orientation relative to stacks) for plant
structures which bouse boilers, control
equipment, and surrounding buildings
within a distance of approximately five stack
heights. .;. .../.,
b. Stack parameters. For all slacks, the
stack height and inside diameter (meters).
and the temperature (K) and volume flow rate
(actual cubic meters per second) br-exit gas
velocity (meters par second} far operation at
too percent 75 percent and SO percent load.
c. BWterslae. For all boilers, the associated
megawatts. 10* BTU/hr, and pounds of steam
per hour, and the design and/or actual fuel
consudqrtian rate for 100 percent load for
coal (tons/hour}, oil (barrels/hour), and
d. BcJJer parameters. For all bolkrs. the
percent an an air used, the hollar type (e£..
wet bottom, cyclone, etc.). and the type of
firing (e.g» pulverized coal, tent firing, etc.).
e. Operating conditions. For all boilers, the
type, amount and |
the total hoottof boiler
boiler
'percent
£ Pollution control
For each boiler served and' each poUutant
anectedt ina type of emission confliol
fMJIFmfBti tilt JMffff Ms '"f^Mflfl. i*.T
design effieasncy and mass emission rale, the
dat* of the last test and the lasted efficiency,
Ihe BUBiber of hours olopanBttOB duriag tie
latest year, and the bast aa|ii)safing.estinate
ofits projected efficiency U used in
conhinction with coal combtution; data far
any anticipated modifications or additkms.
and for all planned modifications to existing
boilers or stacks, the scheduled data of
completion, and the data or bast estimates
available far liana (a) through ffl above
following completion of construction or
modification.
In stationary point source applications for
stanurQa, SIP contiot smieglee should os
tested) " ......
Table 0-1.^
sewer sboold be mooaled sequentially
these loads for every hour of the year. To
evaluateSB* JgcamjrfiaM wtth onartut
shown ID Table «-t should again be '
Emissio
be based on
Id generally
conditions. The
user's guide aboald be cerendrjr consulted
and the dnriflstmAripenteCshouM also
that could be berpraL PSD NAAQS
should follow
shown in Table 9-
tradisg. new
raforto
current 8PA policy and guidance to establish
input data.
UHB VOVHN90 ***"**'*^ ov stfwrttsi BDCI
highways reqidres data on the width of the •
roadway and me tgaM^^an strip* the types and
amounts of poUutant emissions, the number
of fames, the •minimi ftoui each lane and
the height of anUsstoo*. The location of the
enfe of the straJ^raMiwayiegniaBb should
be specified by appropriate grid coordinates.
Deuiledinfarmetion and Ota requirements
faff inodeinig roablte sonross of pollution are
provided in the user's manuals for each of
the modeb applicable to mobile sources.
The iinpatil of growtb on emissions should
be considered In all modeling analyses
covering existing sources, inaaasas in
emissions doe to planned expansion or
panned fuel switches should be Identified.
Increases In emissions at Individual sources
that may be associated with a general
In mutti-eouice urban areas should also be
treated. For new sourcvs the impact of
growth OB eaisetons abouU generally be
considered for the period prior to the start.
up dan far the sonrce. Such changes in
____^
not yet staffed operation.
TABLE 9-1.—Modiu &«SION INPUT DATA FOR POMT SOURCES^
ttiw EmUaton tain (iuUMBtu)e
•KM
(•X0.. hrtyr.
t
•(>) Subjtct to »P DraaHon
(Indudbirj ArNNloa
Anrual&quejMy
Short lam
BaaaM m»m ieuaWoaaJaV* MaaaVtewkaB^
wm o> nowy •nmcv*
«bw pwnvt eWntt*
^ ttrel or
•Ma pemst feret.
MaraHy arton
2 yaws,*
Jk^Aaa^Ja^H^a^ 1*
fwracnvwr •
r«
n*.
9KMBM), or
IA. ai houra of e*ch
(tor al
houra of thn maeioiDlaBlcnl data baaa).*
«oa(a)-
Short!
Coneruoua
tauraof«w
U.. at tain of >
oonatdemton (tor a*
bBM).B
iTrwmo^ input d.^f^Myi.wto foviawr, or
M*^ •• oMsMis aaaaMt ^••^a^a«a^^ a^a* aa^^t«B^^B^BaMatf^Maa^ a^h ~ " "" " ~~
Vtv pOBGy Wl flUiMinOat 10T •etWO pMiyiaVBil B
gTanraflolony ayalenMs mfaol bumlra|ai
for STATE MeVtEMENTATION PLANS.
may apply. Reeir to
nurti M SO paroanl and 75 parcom of
r b* uaao for oiw upas of
^t^» **A
fllN 9V
-------
Faderal Register / Vol. SB. No. 137 / Tuesday, July 20. 1993 / Rules and Ragulations 38837
•M operation does not occur tor a* houra at the time parted of comUeratton (e.a*. 3 or 94 noun) arid the eouree oaetafton ie earattalrad by a
faderaty entereeabla permit condMon. an appropriate adjustment ID the modeled emission mte may ba made (e.g.. tTopamton Is only 8 am. to
4 p-in. each day, only thaw hourt wi be modeled wtfi emissions tan the source. Modeled emissions should not be averaged acroas non-
opeiatngime periods.)
*'""'..
TABLE 9-2.—PCMNT SOURCE MODEL INPUT DATA (EMISSIONS) FOR PSD NAAQS COMPUANCE DEMONSTRATIONS
Averaging *ne
Emission lnift(l/MMBnj)>
Oparatlng level (MMBtu) i
Operating (actor (e.g.. hr/yr, hrMay)
Prapoaad Major Naw or ModMad Soufa
Annual & quarterly
Short teim(s 24
hours).
(Ml or
Kmft or fvdvraty
•Mo ponyttt nrnlt.
DoslQh capacity or
onfoicoflblo poiH
Hon.
f^^^ij—. •^•tMMdhfl M*
Design capacny or
—._JT-.—- — >-*—
OrlfOfCMUNO
Von*.
ConMnuous oparaion (l.a., 8760 houn).<
Contnuous oparatton (1.a., aA hours of aach
Urna parted undar oonaManflon} (tor aH
houta of tha niatamulogtaal data basa).*
Nearby Background Souree(s)«
Annual & quarterly
Short term (S 24
hours).
MR or laoaraiy antorca-
—1->-
Actuator design capacKy
(wnicrMvor •• QfOttfew/t or
Actual oparatfng tactor avamgad ovar lha
most racant 2 yaar»."
AAjM^HUHBk •Bnm»hla ^•mlaalrtsa
MWOmUm MOWIDIO OrfaWOn
etie»It MW •^jl^.^aLj
mm or tooofwiy
abtepeimltlmlL
Actual or design tapet*ty
(whichever Is greater), or
Conanuous operation (i.e., el noun of each
tme period under consMeratton) (for all
hours of the meteorological data base).*
t
Othar Background Sourca(s)«
AnmMt & QuwtMly
Short Ismi ^£24
kjvlH^l
noun).
MttdnniM donvttblo
•nrit or fsdanNy
aUa pannttlmtt.
Msxlnnuni SMWwbla
|^_^A j^ ^A«i^M^Jk«
arm or taoanay
aWapanrttHmlt
Armutl tavol whon
tha most raoant 2 yaars*.
Annual (aval whan actuatty
Aduai opaisflng HBCBJI
moat racanl 2 yaars.s-'
avarapad ovar lha
fta moat racant 2
Conanuous oparaUon Q-a., al hourt of aaeh
am* parted undar oonaMaaHon) (for att
hours of mamataorotogtcaldrtabaia).*
Mrf tltf A
iTerntootooyapplcsbte to fuslburrtog sources; aratogro
•tfoperaXondQesfwtoccurforalrro
fedenaVenlotceable peimtt condHton. an enpiDpiteJeedjBmMrttoJhjsrnodeled emission »»»miy\»tnm^Jfj^Jeata»» is only 8:00 ajn.
to 4*00 pjiv ooch ctay, only-atMoo hours WM bo fnoooloa with oniEMlonB evoin Vw *xwr"j»v» Modolod ominiono fliuuid not bo •vorogod octooo
non^pOBatfng Itovo ponofc
*^^K^.^rfbkjM l^a^ft^h mm&i »m £A Mi^uM.^^^ -a •£ ^^I^MMM^ jj .^k.h^^^k. ahniJH M|A.K k^ ^H.^.^MI^^ ^^ ^^A^^^^bkA MBA *J—-. .»^.Abfttf« Ifa^ htjiit^^A
operaang levate aucn as so percent era TO percent or capeciy snoun ano na mooewo v oewnnne ma nan ceus*ng me ragnest
* jncjudaa existing fedity jowMph modMcallon js^ grapoeed If me emissions from tie eidaeng fedtty w« not ba affected by the modHteallon.
Iheiwlea use the seme panmetsn as for malor modMcetton.
•Unices It la dMemfeodlrtaiM period le not
•Qaneraiy, tw ambient Impacts from non-no
background eourcas can ba raprasantad by aJr quaMy data urtasa adequate data do not
not yat m operation or thet have not astabashsd an appropriate factor, conanuous operation (l.e., 0760 houn)
9.2.1 DiKuMian
Background
pert of the total air quality
be conitdand is drtntnini
Btdtground air quality
etteblith the Impact of nearby sources.
• Backaround comMPtTitfo1*^ ritfluM ba
e-Mfaglngtime.
d Single
monitor. For shorte
Source)
Two optiant ere available to detennine the
nearby *ouroM other than
currently under ooDsldentloo; and (3)
Typicallyreir quality data should be wed
to establish background ooncemratkns in tha
vicinity of the eouroe(s) under constderattoa.
Tbe monitoring network used fct background
determinatiou sbontd oonfam to UM auae
quality aaroraBca and other
tboee networki artahHihed fcr
purpotee.e* An appropiiata data validation
procedure should be applied to *e data prior
tome.
If the source Is not iaobtad, it nay be
necessary to use a multi-eouice model to
Option One: Uee ah- quality data collected
in the vicinity of the foune to determine the
background concentration for the averaging
background concentration at each monitor by
excluding vahwe when the source in
question is unpecung the monitor, ^ne nasn
annual background is the ewtg* of the
annual floncentretions so detanniDad at sach
'For ptBpMH at PSD, the locrfoo at mtmttan m
well ei
-------
**3S Federal Register / Vol. 58. No. 137 / Tuesday. July 20. 1993 / Rules and Regulations
9.2J «eeotBnmdetiott*(Multi-Souice
Arras) •''...
In-multi-source areas two components of
background should ba determined.
-Nearby Sources: All source* expected to
cause • significant conoratntion gradient In
t be vidntty of tta source or sources under
consideration for emission UmltM should be
explicitly modeled. For evaluation for
compliance with Ihe short term and annual
ambient standards, the nearby sources should
be modeled using the emission input date
shown in Table 9-1 or 9-2. The number of
*ucfa source* is expected to be small except .
in MilHtflialfttiiftiffflTi The "••'by source
inventflfy Should OS*flffJTURl1^**! IB
tensultauoowithtncrcviewingauthority.lt
is envisioned that the neirby sources and the
sources under consideration will be
evaluated together using an appropriate
Appendix A modeL
The impact of the nearby sources should be
examined at locations when interactions
between the plume of the point source under
consideration and thoae of nearby sources
Significant locations include: (1) The ana of
maximum impact of the point source; (2) the
ana of maximum impact of nearby SOUIOBS. ^
and (3) the ana when all sources combine '
may be idenuliedthrough trial and error .
analyses. .
Other Sources: That portion of the . .
background attributable to all other sources'
(e-g.. natural source*, minor sources and '
distant major sources) should be determined
by flut MOBvduffff- found in section 9. 2.3 or
bv application of amodel using Table 9-1 or
9J
utDato
The meteorological data used as input to a
dispersion model should be nlected on the
i of spatial and *|i™«t«ii^>e»i (temporal)
representativeness as well as the ability of
the individual parameters selected to
characterize die transport and dispenion
conditions in the ens of concern. The
lepfanniativeness of tne data ie dependent
on: (1) The proximity of the meteorological
monitoring site to the area under
, consideration: (2) the complexity of tin
terrain: (3) the exposure of the meteorological
dur^^bicfa date an collected. The spatial
i jspiesentatnenees off tin data can be
adversely affected by lane distances between
the source and receptors of interest and the
complex topographic characteristics of the
function of the year-to-year variations to
weather conditions. .••• ;'
Model inputdate an normally obtained
either tram the National Weather Service or
Local universities, FAA. mUitary stations.
Industry and pollution control aaanrlei may
also be sources of such date. Some -
data an included in this subsectioiv
9.3.1 Length of lUeetd ofMeteorologltal
Date
9.3.1.1 Wscusston. The model user
should acquin enough meteorological date to
. 'ensure that wont^ne metaoiological
conditions en adeouately lepneented tn the
•model results. The trend toward statistically
based standards suggests a need for all
meteorological conditions to be adequately
represented in the data set selected for model
input. The number of yean of record needed
to obtain a stable distribution of conditions
depends on the variable being measured and
has been estimated by Undsherg and •?
Jacobs •• far various parameters. Although
that study indicates in excess of 10 yean may
be required to achieve stability in the
frequency distributions of some
an not reasonable far model Input
This
is due in part to the bet that hourly data in
model input forpat an frequently not
available for such periods and that hourly
calculations of ooncentntton for long periods
an prohibitively expensive.A recent study**
compared various periods from a 17-year
data set to determine the minimum number
of years of data needed to approximate the
concentrations modeled with • 17-year
period of meteorological dam from one
station. This study indicated that the
variability of node! estimates due to the
meteorological data input wes adequately
reduced if a 5-year period of record of
meteorological input wes used.
. Five years of
dan should be
air quality modeL Consecutive yean from the
mostncentf rasjoliy available ^yoarpeiiod
are preisiied. The metenmlngirel data may
bedatacoUectedettberonsiteoratthe
nearest National Weather Service (NWS)
staUoo,Iftbeeoiuceislarge.e.g.>a500MW
power plant, the use of S years of NWS
roeteornlftgical data or at least 1 year of site-
speciftc date is reoniied.
U one year or more, up to five years, of
sltespedfic data is available, these data an
pretend for use in sir quality analyses. Such
data should have been subjected to quality
assurance procedures as described in Section
9.3.3.2.
Foe permitted sources whose-emission
I on a specific year of
they can be used in me models.-STAR-
summiries en avaUable bom NCDC for long
term model use. These are Joint frequency
distributions of wind speed, direction and P-
G stability category. They are used as direct
input u models such as the long term version
of ISC"
ftnT?i2r«3l flflffiioiflsisTOftfitJfffiffiiiL Tile prflfeaTpd
short term models listed in appendix A all •
accept as input the NWS meteorological data
preprocessed into model compatible form.
Long4enn (monthly seasonal or annual)
preferred models use NWS "STAB"
summaries. Summarired concentration
estimatas from the short term models may
also be used to develop long-term averager.
the two separate input data sets may not
necessarily agree.
Although most NWS measurements are
made at e standard beight of 10 meters, the
actual anemometer height should be used as
input to the pr
National We
vfcmd model.
Veether.Service wind directions
are feported to the nearest 10 degrees. A
specific set of randomly generated numbers
has been developed for use with the
preferred EPA models and should be used to
ensure a lack of bias hi wind direction
assignments within the models.
Beta torn univer siUes, FAA. mititaty
statiooa. jmnittry and pollution
agent las Buy be used if such data an
equivalent la aeeuracy end detail to the NWS
9.3.3 Site-Specific Data
flJJ.1 DiKTOWM. Spatial or
•MBisspwnlnpsfMelasisisstfiTsnMM it OMt
e^evedbycottecaonofaUoftheDeeded
"**"•>? Input dflto art th«t ^cftul ritt of that
•owcflCs). Stto-vpodfic OMmmd
-------
Federal U*gfru / VoL 5d. No. 137 / Tmeday. July 20, 1999 /Knit* and
Systems"**
1 ami « t>ii8ii of
All sttMoeciflc data should be reduced to
hourly averagae. Table »-3 lists the wind
related parameters sad the avenging time
i. Temperature
i should be made at standard
shelter height (2m) in annorriiimie win the
guidance m reference 66.
Wind MaoiiiMumi** Wbut mMd eiut
direction should be measured at orneer
plume height far use in esUmsting transport
has a stack below lOOm. select the stack top
height For sources with stacks extending
above 100m. a 100m tower is i
cover and ceiiingc
Idnhooriydoud
.The wind
tat or near
10m. The imolationrate to typically uiimrt
SIS oil criteria ontUned by Tniaer.** tojiM
abtenca of «tta ipenillc obe«r»atlnn» of ctrod
co»«t and eelUng. altematiTe pmcedune
using wiad Bncniatiaa itatMla (La, the«»
and «• methods) » and Tumer't metfaod
with oiNUe doHdoowet •adoaUing andtn-
~aUe 10m wind ipeed tn feoonniunidndi
Tlie two methods of stability clarification
which ue wind Itactnatton ttattittei, the 0*
and ofe nathodt; an deBcnbed ID detail l&
EPA'e "On-Sto Meteuiuloglcal Program
Guidance to Regulate^ ModBiing
ApplfcatkMf"- (note appHcaWe table* in
coaptar6).mthecaieottbe0AiBethodlt
ihould be noted that wtod meander may
oecarianaUr Uar^detmlnation of eA and
thiu WH to m mmvouB ortMnitMtioB w
Uw P^» stiUUly cs!0|(My* To Bunnnln wind
dirpctipp OMMKMf ooirtHbuttoiitt OA my be
d0t0nnloQd far Bich of tour IS^mimite
pflriodf ift vi DOW* Howwof • 360 uupwi
an needed during each tS^ninute period. «
the OA method tebefag UMd teftaMlitjr
detenninattonB in mew itaitlaa*. take the
far use in
appUcatioBi employing oolite
meteocolagkal data. MPRM is • genenl
pmpowmeteorologlcmld^pnrprocewof
which fupports ngulatoiy modeli requiring
RAMMBT faanatted data and STAR
formatted data. In addition to on-aite data.
NWS date. MBTPRDi* the nqulrod
meteorological data pcepraoeeiot far UM with
CTIMifPLUS.AIioftbeabi
i an availabl* far downloading
fttmtheSatAMBBS.**
TABLE 9-3.—AVERAGING TIMES FOR
SITE-SPECIFIC WIND AND TURBU-
LENCE MEASUREMENTS
Suite* «M
Mulon wMepeed
(tor UM In
end OA) tar UM to etobWy de-
1-hr
1-hr.
1-hr.
1-hr.'
meters (200m or more). In cases with stacks
200m or above, the Regional Office should
•quantof the bar 15 mlntita «A'a. M
fflunmndteflie feobwtoto Table
t
height on«<
MU^ may be a faeiibl* alternative. Th*
dilution wiod ipeed iiaad in dMeiminJag
*To MMntts) meejidef eviacti el <..
9-3.While wind_oondNtar» am ioht andtar Mrtable.
irnkw the hourly evenoe 9 vame nun
',Mauami«lal»f».oXt 22^J2tSSu1.f
dotMinkw the hourly eve
four eequenW tt-n*iute height iftSere it mm than
height ead surface (-lOm) wind speeds;
(2) <% from slle»epeclftc measurements In
. (3) VA fam site-speciflc meejarements hi
accordance with gn1nance;e»
(4) Tutusf*! method" using site specific
wind speed with cloud cover and ceiling
height tern a nearby NWS site.
i.The
9.3.4 »eeOBent of C
U.4.1 OtewsJML Treatment of calm or
light and variable wind poses a special
following I
recommended by BPAs RAMMBT.
POtAMMBT. STAR. PCSTAR. MPRM."*
aadMBTPRO.** RAMMBT is the
CDO t
, fliff Tfintl ffitnl tliCTiM t>
van^Speciflcatlonifacwmdi *
inetramente ejna eyatams exe
"On^ite Meteonuceical ft
tat Regulatocy Modelmg AppUckdoBs".*
far use in application* employing hourly
NWS date. The RAMMBT fatmat is the
(tiWdVO' flfllft lOptR BIDn ttMG ID VBAMBZIU
PCRAMMBrbtbePCequlvalenttiftii*
mainframe version fRAMMETJ. STAR is the
tCTtirr^^'-^r^»l"*-t*~rMq>
dlstributiou (triad dtoectioii and wind speed
is inveneiy propoiHniial to wind speed* '
unmaUMkaUyi^a when triad speeds lees
thanlm/seTempnttothemodeLA
———^^J—^^ • --- - liiiiti ilnmiil tarn - - -- -- •**-
prooeoan nee oeen oeveiopea sat use wim
*NWS itani to pnvent UN occumnoe oioverijr
co&servBtrfe HIM Mill titlon estimttes during
periods of alms. This procedure
acknowledges that a Cams tan plnrne model
does not apply during cabn conditions and
that w lOBOwiodgo of plume behavior and
wind patterns during these re
ditions do
not, at present permit the development of a
disreavrdshoin* which are identified as
cabn. The Jmir to treated as missing and a
-------
\ . . ' . • .
38840 Federal Register / VdC -SB, No. 137 / Tuesday. July 20. 1993 / Rules and Regulations
t-rniiiamfain fap handling miming hmii« I.
Pnpi
ete
logical daU input to
substitute a
most appendix A EPA 1
1.00 m/s wind speed and theprevtous'
direction for the cahn hour. The new
treatment of calms in- those models attempts
to identify the original calm cases by
checking for a 1.00 m/s wind speed
coincident with • wind direction equal to the
previous hour's wind direction. Such cases
an then treated to a prescribed manner when
estimating short tend concentrations.
9JA2 Socouuawdations. Hourly
concentrations calculated with Gaussian
- models using cairn* tliiouid oot be considered
valid; the wind and concentration estimates
far these hours should be disregarded and
considered to be mining. Critical
concentrations for 3-, 8-. and 24-hour
averages should be calculated by dividing the
sum of the hourly concentration for the
period by the number of valid or nonmisslng
hours. If the total number of valid hours is
less than 18 far 24-hour averages, lest than
6 for S-hour avenges or toss than 3 for 3-hour
avenge*, the total concentration should be
divided by 18 for the 24-hour avenge. 6 for
the 8-hour average and 3 for the 3-hour
avenge. For annual averages, the sum of all
valid hourly concentrations i* divided by the
number of non-calm hours during the year.
A post-processor computer program.
such a* review of a proposed souice, no
practical alternative exist*. Therefore, then i*
an obvious need to know how accurate
models natty an and how any uncertainty in
the
ate* affacteiegulatory de
EPA TtM'gTT' the need for incorporating
such information and has sponsored
workshops"-" on model accuracy, the
possible way* to quantify accuracy, and oa
considerations in the incorporation of model
accuracy and uncertainty in the regulatory
process. The* Sacond~(EPA) Conference on
Air Quality Modeling, August 1982." was
tj0YOt0Q tO tlllt WlljJKa*.
10.1.1 Overview of Model Uncertainty
Dispersion models generally attempt to
estimate concentrations at specific sites that
really represent an ensemble average of
numerous repetitions of the same event The
'event it characterised by measured or
"known" conditions that an input to the
models, e.g.. wind speed, nixed layer height.
iface heat fl
tation characteristic
etc. However, in addition to the known
conditions, than an unmeasured or
unknown variations in the conditions of this
event, e*.. unresolved detail* of the
atmospheric flow such as the turbulent
velocity field. These unknown conditions.
y vary among repetitions of the event As
progra
pared
CAlMPROn has been prepared following
these instructions and has been hardwired in
tha following models: RAM. ISC, MFTER and
CRSTER. .' - •
The recommendation* above apply to the
use of calms for short term avenges and do
avenges using "STAR" date summaries.
Calms should continue to be included in the
preparation of "STAR" summaries. A
treatment far calms and very light winds is
built into the softwan that produces the
"STAR" summaries.
t conditions, including extended
»of calms, often produce nigh
ntntions over wide ana* for relatively
long averaging period*. The standard short
tenn Gaussian models an often not
applicable to *uch situation*- When
nMKJg^^ft techttioue* *hould be considand
on a ctte-by-ease basis. (See also section
8.2.10)
Whan used in Gaussian model*, measured
on-slte wind speeds of lass than l m/s but
higher than the response threshold of thr
instntnunt should OB Input is IJD/S* *hfr
corresponding wind direction should also be
input Observations below the response
threshold of the Instrument an also set to 1
m/t but tha wind direction from the pnvious
hour is used. If the wind speed or direction
can not be determined, that hour should be
treated as missing and thort term averages
should then be calculated as above.
i&O Accure^ and Uncertainty efModeia
10.1 ZMseuttian
Increasing nliance ha* been placed on
concentration estimates from models as the
primary basis far regulatory decisions
.concerning souiua pamit* and tHirittitui
control nQuifexnonts. In HWW situations*
a result, deviation
oonoentntions from their emenibw avenge,
and from the concentntions estimated by the
model, are likely to occur even though the
known conditions an fixed. Even with a
perfect model that predict* the correct
ensemble average, man am likely to be
deviations from the observed concentrations
In individual repetitions of the event due to
variations in the unknown conditions. The
statistics of
to emeige. A* a result most discussions of the
accuracy of models make no quantitative
distinction between (1) limitations of the
model versus (2) limitations of the date base
and of knowledge concerning atmospheric
variability. The reader should be aware that
statements on model accuracy and
uncertainty may imply the need for
improvements in model performance that
even the "perfect" model could not satisfy.
10.1.2 Studies of Model Accuracy
A number of studies™** have been
conducted to examine model accuracy,
particularly with respect to the reliability of
short-term concentrations required for
ambient standard and increment evaluations.
The results of these studies are not
1 Basically, they confirm what
BOtpheric scientists have said fir
: (1) Model* an nun reliable for
estimating longer time-averaged
concentntions than for estimating short-term
concentntions at specific locations; and (2)
the models an reasonably reliable in
estimating tha magnitude of highest
concentntions occurring sometime,
somewhen within an ana. For example.
errors hi highest estimated concentntions of
± 10 to 40 percent an found to be typical,"
Le..certainly wall within the often quoted
fsctor-of-two accuracy that has long been
recognized for these models. However,
estimates of concentntions that occur at a
specific time and site, an poorly correlated
with actually observed concentrations and
surprising.
leading at
an much lass reliable.
As noted above, pi
id concentntions at fixed stations may
elation* betwee
due to "reducible" uncertainties in
to unquantified inherent uncertalntii
termed ?Jiuteranruiic**t»fa«y. Available STS?*' fZ^aZPtt^J^'ffi£,
evidence susMste that this source of **• input anon, maximum ground-leys
and
For
evidence suggests that this source of
tainty alone
e may be responsible for a
variation in concentntions of
typical range of
as much at *$0 percent"
Moreover, then is "reducible-
uncertainty " associated with tha model and
its iii * .- - — - - -
bate* an peifact. Reducible uncertainties an
canted by: (l) Uncertainties in the input
value* of the known option*— emission
chvictanstics SJBQ nirtsjOfolOyCM tuts* (2 j
wron i& tiiaf HMttund conottDtntioBv wliich
•1ft US0Q tO C00pllt0 th*t
iwldutls; tnd (
ra
vra Mtt0r
To us*t tM
to modal
CBfFKtlye I
be limited to that
poitim of iwhjdbk uncertainty which deal*
wiuthephytic* and the formulation of the
nv>deL The accuracy of OM model it
normally detamined by an evaluation
procedun which involve* tha companion of
" _ J_l . „*__-* ,il^ . a . . "^
-level
concentntions at a given hour for a point
source in flat terrain could be in error by 50.
percent due to these uncertainties. .
Uncertainty of five to 10 degree* in the
meatund wind direction* which transports
the plume, can result In concentration errors
of 20 to TO percent for a particular time and
location, depending on stability and station
location. Such uncertainties do not indicate
that an estimated concentration doe* not
occur, only that the precise time and •
location* an in doubt
10.1.3 Uat of Uncertainty in Decition-
MaUng
The accuracy of model estimates varies
with tha modal used, tha type of application.
and site-specific characteristics. Thus, it U
desirable to quantify the accuracy or
uncertainty associated with concentration
estimates used in decision-making.
Dnanunlcationi between modelers and
decision-makers mutt be fostered and further
davi
I air quality data.** The statement of
accuracy is bated on ttetistical taste or
comlation* •&»** However* information that
allows a distinction between contributions of
tha various
reducible u
of nuiamit and.
ainty is only now beginning
Procedures far quantifying and in
uncertainty in tha practical applfa
such cuncapt* are only beginning
_»»1. _*...J« I. .AIll - - - * - * «J M i»
VIMM* Tnrnari i—vnir m*w ww^ nnmii,!•,!•• i
much study is still required.'*."-"
exist L
jn* dealing
It* meaning
'by tha lack
and
i
-------
Rngtotar / VoL 88. No. 137 / Tuesday. July 20. IMS J Rule* aad Jtagulattom 38841
t
i of models an effort to
-___., ifytnennabttlr,
model estimate* far that particular i
to determine the magnitude and sources of,
error associated with the use of the model
and quantifying limitations in the accuracy.
predsion and sensitivity of the procedure.
tntnrmmHm* >h^ tplght fff Hftft'l ^? ft1*
decision-maker in *~^g"^"j the
seriousness of potential ate quality violations
includes such model accuracy estimates as
accuracy of peal
correlation, nqi
•nd time and
attAMS Woods Bole
Workshop." en beii« fallowed. The neuli*
of the scientific review en being
incorporated to this guideline ud will be the
basis fa futon revision, u. u Third, mttv
ipedflc information hu been provided far
)ustirVii« the site specific use of alternative
models in *^* documents "Interim
Procedures fa Evaluating Air Quality ?
Model*".» ud toe -Protocol for
, may be shown tabs taw than
•ooapMU*. Alto, then nay be BO
fertbeattu«ttOB.Intbi
ikpndlctions.btes.iioi!
y distribution, spatial
extort of high cauantntion. etc. Both space/
and unpaired comparisons are
recorniM^.tmphasto should be on the
highest concentrations and {he avenging
concern. Where posrible. confidence
intervals about the statistical values should
be provided. Howeyer. while such
information can be provided by the modeler
to the decision-maker. U is undew how this
information should be mini to make an ait
pollution control decision. Given a range of
possible outcomes. It to easiest and tends to
ensure consistency if the decision-maker
confines his judgment to use of the "beat
estimate- provided by the modeler (Lt. the
QBn£& CflQPflfliHuOtt tMtlHUMn by ft tmuf*|
racommraded in this guideline or an
alternate model oTlmown accuracy}. This Is
an indication of the practical limitations
imposed by current abilities of the technical
To improve the basis tor derlsinn-msMng.
EPA bif offwopwl mo is continuing tfr
iw far
Together these documents provide methods
that allow a Judgment to be made as to what
models are most appropriate far a specific
application* For the present, peribcmanoi
and the theoretical evaluation of models we
being used as an unuect means to ouantuy
one element of uncertainty in ah- pollution
limitations may be established solely on the
basis of observed air quality data as would
be applied to a modeung analysis. The same
can should be given to the analyses of the
air quality date as would be applied to a
modeling analysis.
The current NAAQS for SO] aad CO are
both stated m terms of a concentration not to
be exceeded men than once a year. Then to
only an annual standard far NO] and a
quarterly standard for Pb. The PM-10 and
ooona standards permit the exeeedsnce of a
confflntnlloH on an aneiaga of not more than
once a year the convention to to average over
a 3-year period.*-•»• MS This represento a
fa addition to perfonnance evalualion-of
models, sensitivity analyse* an encouraged
can provide additional
since
a deliHiiilftlttir to a more
The NAAQS an subjected to
the data base* and on the uncertainty in
Mty analyse* can aid
lofi
^
msficuncies nf
variations or uncertainties in the data bases
on the range of likely concentrations. Such
information may be used to determine source
sensitivity analyses should be made available
to the decision-maker with an appropriate
-interpretation of the efnct on the critical
centrations.
extettsiw iwlew and possible revision every
5 years.
Tnto sectioB dtocussae general
nts lor concentration estimates and
_', and expressing confidence levels
In decisions that an i
tto mem \n*rt*m "braddns new ponatT
wittt slow sjno spomiicpTOffws iikjeiy* As sj
of modal mkcntainty in ded«kMii.*iii§b
brtaggfcttp »> into ttmiu Thar> it inf*«npkli
^nVltAttfwl fwAnM^MtniVi Mt Wnl^g^ninnnl tJt ntVLnl
uncertainty thai an mod resmnt to fee
dedsJon-nMker.lt is not ctear how a
identifies the relationship to emission limits.
The fallowing recommendations apply to: {1}
Revisions of State Implementation Plans; (2)
of significant deteriontion^SD); and (3)
analyse* of the emissions trades ("bubbles").
11.2.1 AnarystoKequlMmeuts
Bveiy effort should be made by the
Regtonai OOce to meet wtth all parties
involved in either a SIP revision or s PSD
ppbeation prior to the start of
During this
work on such a
a
viewing parties to define the
pfopesa nee been- titifM to BManingftiuy
uocertalnry.
10.1.4 Evaiuatioa of Models
A number of actions are being taken to
ensure that the beet model to used comedy
model is not aibitaa^ imposed. First, this
guidoiiikt clMtiy McxMQBMRMbi tbet nott ~
approprlato model be ueed in each cem
Prelgnedinodels.basedonasaimberof
fiKton. en identified for mnny uses. Cenecel
•uidenoi on using •Jtamttfte to the
prebend models Uelso provided. Second.
all themodeU in eight categories (Le., na»X
uxban* industrial isDnroieQKt inactive)
pollutants, mobile souros, complex terrain,
visibmry and long range transport) thMaw
pmtf idatfft tar inrlnthm 't '^ u (p-<«*-u». ^y
being subjected to. a systematic perfbBnaac*
evahutlon and a peer edmtiac review. *•
^ie seme oate bnsee aie neinK uaed to
evaluate all models withtawca of eight
indyd^na measuive of dlfEafeejon for
residuals) such as bins, variance of dlfisrenee
•ad gross variability of the dlflmoe. and
measuna of oonwajtion i
/ develop andl
tmptomentahle. thto guidance will be
changed and expanded. For the present.
continued use of the "best estimate** to
acceptable and tot
proceduns to be followed, the date to be
collected, the model to be used, and the
An example of requirements far such an
effort to contained in the Air Quality
Analysto Checklist Included here as
Appendix C Thto checklist suggests the level
of detail nquindtoeesess the six quality
resulting nsn the pn
lljO
12.1
Procedures wtth lespact to the witew and
analysis of air quality modeling and date
analyses m support of SIP revisions. PSD
pflC^DlttlOB QnTOtbiBf nftUlettOeQF H.QIlDHBilBV
need a certain amount of standardisation to
ensure consistency in the depth and
tiM analysto Itself* Thto aection •••'•••••••••"i"
«t»MMlmlT««»lmi wtilU mt Am *mm* HUM
allowing the Oaodbillty needed to assun the
technic^y best analysto far each regulatory
appUcation.
wiO>masupp«tofmeafundntomMlUr
data,anth«pTefemdbastofarairqua%
wbm u0 ptnoneMiiOeV of
teKfaoi(|IIBC» by CQBpttilDQ Wil&OOMKVH lit
i end thto should be determined
and agreed upon at thto preappUcaUon
meeting. The pratocol should ne written and
agreed upon, by the parties concerned,
aTthough •fanHl legal document to not
mgee in such a protocol are
Las the dateonflection and
> Ilusievsti the protocol
^^^ i the potential
of the proposed soume or control strategy to
violate^* PSD increment or NAAQS. ft to
found IB "Screea^Prooso^for
BstimatmgtheAirQuAutyhnectof
Stationary Sonrciis" «» be used far point
plDC8wnM§ at
I in
-------
38842 Fedarpl Register / Vol. 58, No. 137 / Tuesday, July 20, 1993 / Rules and. Regulations
"Guideline for
iron Roadway tot
If the ciiiuieiitrailoB estimates from
screening techniques Indicate that the PSD
Cuban Monoxide
I"M is available.
Increment or I
exceeded, dm • man refined modeling
analysis it appropriate and the nodal u*ar
tbould Mlect« model according to
'•"ynnumdaMont In tmfrkmt 4-f fa tfl™«
instances, no refined technique may be
specified in thii guide far the situation. The
mode) user is then encouraged to submit t
model developed specifically for the case at
,ppty the needed i
Regional Office* tbould require permit
i to incorporate the pollutant
contributions of all sources into their
analysis. Where necessary this may include
emissions associated with growth to the area
of impact of tne new or modified Source's
impact. PSD air quality assessments should
consider the amount of the allowable air
quality increment that has already been
granted to any other sources. Therefore, the
most recent source applicant should model
the existing or permitted sources in addition
to tile one currently under consideration.
This would permit the use of newly acquired
data or improved modeling techniques if
such have become available since the last
source was permitted. When remodeling, the
wont case used in the previous modeling
analysis should be one tat of conditions
modeled in the new analysis. All sources
should be modeled for each set of
meteorological conditions selected and for all
receptor sites used la the previous
applications as well as new sites specific to
the new source*
1UL2 Use of Measured Data in Ueu of
Model Estimates
is tM pptfaml mrthod KMT
icsion limitations fee both
new and existing sources. When a pretemd
model is available, model results alone
CMncUtding background) an sufficient*
Monitoring wtll normaUy not be accepted as
the sole basis far emission limitation
instances whan the modeling technique
available to only a screening technique, the
addition of air quality data to the analysis
may lend credence to model result*.
There are circumstances when there la BO
applicable model, ead measured dam may
need to be used* Examples of such situations
are: (1) Complex terrain locations; (2) land/
; and (3) urban locations
d. Do-the data eat end theanarvsis«Uow
impact of the most important individual
sources to be identified if more than one ..
source or emission point Is involved;
e. Is at least one full year of valid ambient
data available; and
g f**M |A 1 -- li,lllllin II • •••••!• ll tj, -J. ltm|. *|«
i. van Hoe oenionsmueQ impugn me
com part ton of monitored data with model
results that available models are not *
applicable?
The number of monitors required is a
function of the problem being considered.
figurat
The
guration, terrain
Interpretation of Mr Quality Standards" »»
should be tallowed. Bus guideline specifies
that a violation of a short term standard
occurs at a site when the standard li
exceeded a second time. Thus, emission
limits that protect standards for averaging
times of 24 hours or less are appropriaUtly
based on the highest, second-f '
estimated concentration plus a I
concentration which can teasonabl/be
assumed to occur with the concentration.
11.2.3.2 NAAQS Analyst for New or
configuration, and meteorological variations
all have an impact on number and placement
of monitors. Decisions can only be made oa
a case-by-case basis. The Interim Procedures
tor Evaluating Air Quality Models" should
be used in establishing criteria for
hould obtain approval
Regional Office or reviewing authority for the
monitoring network rwiortothertartof
nMUiiloiiiift. A no&itofiBg protocol 4gnMi to
by all concerned parties is highly desirable.
The design of the network, uu number, type
and location of the monitors, the sampling
period, averaging time as well as the newfor
meteorological monitoring or the use of
mobile f*t"p**"fl or plume tracking
. should all be specified in the
HUtWOnL
M.Z3 Emission Limits
11.2.3.1 D*
ibuadt
tin
.Emissic
limits should be
estimates for the averaging time that results
in the most stringent control requirements.
The concentration used in specttyiag
emission limits Iscalled the design value or
nonimitration contributed by the source and
To determine the averaging time for the
design verne. the most restrictive National
Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS)
«houMbeidenunedbyt.«kulaHiig.iareech
•VUMJlMt tlBM* UW ItttiO Of tM •ppuC.UHal
NAAQSTS) inimu background (B) to the
predicted coocentratton (P) (La., (S-BVP).
The averagini time with the lowest ratio
t restrictive standard If the
ronii.il •wngfeis tM molt cwtticttw* tb4i
with a large fraction of pi
from nontraditional aoun
in the case of an existing i
. However, only
should
•i>niilfof4Tifl data eJfl*i^ be a basis for emission
limits. In addition, tat following items
should be considered prior to the acceptance
of the measured data:
a. Does a monitoring network exist for the
pollutants and avenging times of concern;
b. Has the monitoring network been
designed to locate1 polata of nuudBtnn
uuBcaiUraltoB froBioBe oraBuniberof yean
of data is the design value. When short term
•tviiwnls m nMMt vostricUtVi it imy iw
nM8Muy to om»id«r • braider rap of
.*vm.Mnftttftttimu thsn riiai hiflluurt vniltiM Pt^
, example, for pollutants such as SOi, the
highest, escond-highest conoantnrtion It the
design value. For pollutants «rith statistically
based NAAQS, the design value Is found by
determining the more restrictive at (1) The
abort-term concentration that if not expected
to be exceeded more than once per year over
the period specified la the standard, or (2)
c.Oo tb»monitoring network and the data
reduction and storage procedures meet EPA
monitoring and quality assurance1
nquri eroftn^s*
Determination of design values for PM-10 is
presented la mom detail la the "PM-10 SIP
Development Guideline".'"
When the highest.
ibusec
i used in
vtolatioiisofashorttermNAA
tbatanldentifled.n~Guideunefar
criteria
Modified Sources. For
ormodifted
sources predicted to have a significant
ambient Impact** and to be locatee In areas
designated attainment or ^yfirlaJtifiaWn for
the SOz. Pb. NO*, or CO NAAQS, the
demonstration as to whether the source will
cause or contribute to an air quality violation
should be based on: (1) The high** estimated
annual avenge concentration dutermined
from annual averages of Individual years; or
(2) the highest, second-highest estimated
concentration for averaging times of 24-houn
or less; and (3) the significance of the spatial
and temporal contribution to any modeled
violation. For Pb, the highest estimated
concentratioB based on an individual
calendar quarter averaging period should be
used. Background concentrations should be
added to the estimated impact of the source.
Tne most restrictive standard should be used
fat all cases to assess the threat of aa air
quality violation. For new or modified
sources predicted to have a significant
•tnhtunt impact's in aieai designated
attainment or unclasslfiable for the PM—10
NAAQS, the demonstration of whether or not
the source will cause or contribute to an air
quality violation should be based on
sufficient data to show whether (1) The
protected 24-hour average concentrations
will exceed the 24-hour NAAQS more than
once per year, on average: (2) the expected
(La*, avenge) annual mean concentration will
exceed the annual NAAQS; and (3) the
source contributes signiftcantly. in a
temporal and spatial sense, to any modeled
violation.
11.24.3 PSD Air Quality Increment* and
Impact*. The allowable PSD Increments for
criteria pollutants are established by
regulation and died in 40 CFp 81.166. These
tavdinuai allowable increases in pollutant
concentrations may be exceeded once per
year at each site, except for the annual
increment that may not be exceeded. The
highest, second-highest increase in estimated
concentrations for the short term averages as
determined by a modal should be less than
the permitted increment The
modeled annual averages should not exceed •
the tocrament*
Screening techniques defined in sections 4
and 5 can sometimes be used to estimate
short term Incremental concentrations for the
first new source that triggers the baseline in
a given
*. Jlly-— ,—.*t44_l»
, wnen Buiupte
g sources are Involved in
the calculation, the use of a refined model
with at least 1 year of on-site or S years of
off-site NWS data is normaUy required. In
such cases, sequential niodiH^e' must
i that the allowable increments
an not exceeded temporally and spatially.
La., for all receptors far each Una period
I
-------
Federal Regieier / Vol. 5». No. 137 / Tuesday, July 20, 1993 / Rules and Regulations 38843
I
throughout the ywr(*) (ttmer«riodineans
the appropriate PSD averaging time. e.g.. a*
hour. 24-hour, etc.).
The PSD regulations nqnira an estivation'
of ueSOt-particulale matter, and NCh
impact on any Oast I area. Normally.
Gaussian models should not to applied «t
distances greater thi
by toe steady state
such modal
can be accommodated
mptions inherent in
procedures foe applying the modal moat be-
defined in the regulation. -The consequences
oftha repUcaeiUty requirement are that
bubbles for sources located in complex
temta and certain industrial sources where
Judgments must be made on source
.chancteiiaatlan cannot to handled
genetically.
distance tat
refined Gaussian model application for
regulatory purposes is generally considered
to be 50km. Beyond the SOkxn range,
screening techniques may be used to
determine if more refined modeling I*
needed. If refined models are needed, long
range transport models should be considered
in accordance with section 7.2.6. As
previously noted in sections 3 and 7, the
need to involve the Federal land Manager in
decisions on potential air quality impacts.
particularly in relation to PSD Class I areas,
cannot be overemphasized.
11.2.3.4 Emissions Trading Policy
(Bubbles). EPA'* final Emissions Trading
Policy, commonly referred to as the "bubble
policy," was published in the Federal
Register in 1986.** Principles contained in
the policy should be used to evaluate
ambient impacts of emission trading
activities.
Emission Increases and decreases within
the bubble should result in ambient air
quality equivalence. Two levels of analysis
an defined for establishing this equivalence.
In a Level I analysis the source configuration
and setting must meet certain limitations
(defined in the policy) that ensure ambient
equivalence; no modeling is required. In a
Level U analysis a modeling demonstration of
ambient equivalence is required but only the
sources involved in the emissions trade are
modeled. The resulting ambient estimates of
net Increases/decreases are compared to a set
of significance levels to determine if the
bubble can be approved. A Level fl analysis
require* the use of a refined model and the
most recant readily available full year of
representative meteorologicBl data. • '
Sequential modeling must demonstrate that
the significaaca levels are met temporally
and spatially. Le., for all receptors for each
tiiM period throughout the year (time period
mean* the appropriate NAAQS averaging
time. e.g.. 3-hour. 24-hour, etc).
For those bubbles that cannot meet the
Level I or Level 0 requirements, the
Emission* Trading Policy allows for a Level
m analysis. A Level ffl analysis, from a
modeling standpoint la generally equivalent"
to the requirements far a standard SIP
revision where all sources (and background).
are considered and the estimates an
compared to the NAAQS as in section
11.2.3.2.
The Emissions Trading Policy allows
State* to adopt generic regulation* for
processing bubble*. The modeling
apply to such generic regulations. However,
an added requirement is Out the modeling
procedures mniHtu^ In any generic
regulation must be nplicable such that there
is no doubt at to how each individual bubble
will be modeled. In general this means that
the models, the data bases and the
124
?•
Regul
Part 51): Protection of the Environment:
Requirements for Preparation, Adoption, and
Submittal of Implementation Plan*.
2. Environmental Protection Agency. 1977.
Guidelines for the Regional Evaluation of
State and Local New Source Review Program.
EPA Publication No. BPA-450/2-77-027.
US. Environmental Protection Agency.
Research Triangle Park. NC (NTIS No. PB-
275053)
3. Environmental Protection Agency, i960.
Prevention of Significant Deterioration
Workshop Manual. EPA Publication No.
EPA-4SO/2-80-O61. US. Environmental
Protection Agency. Research Triangle Park.
NC (NTIS No. PB 61-136459)
4* ataviraBiiwDftvl Pvotoclion Agmcy, 1961*
Guideline far Fluid Modeling of Atmospheric
Diffusion. EPA Publication No. EPA-600/8-
81^)09. US. Environmental Protection
Agency. Research Triangle Park, NC (NTIS
No. PB 61-201410)
5. Code of Federal Regulations (Title 40,
part SO): Protection of the Environment;
National Primary and Secondary Ambient
Air Quality Standards.;
6. Environmental Protection Agency, 1966.
Model dearinghouae: Operational Plan
(Revised). Staff Report. US. Environmental
Protection Agency. Research Triangle Park,
NC (Docket No. A-68-04,B-H)
~ -_ 1Q80>
12. American Meteorological Society. 1983.
Synthesis of the Rural Modal Reviews. EPA
Publication No.EPA-600/3-83-106. US.
Environmental Protection Agency. Research
Triangle Park, NC (NTIS No. PB 84-121037)
13. American Meteorological Society. 1984.
Review of the Attributes and Performance of
Six Urban Diffusion Models. EPA Publication
No. EPA-400/S3-84-089. U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency. Research
Triangle Park. NC (NTIS No. PB 84-236850)
llwhlte. P.O. (Ed). JXS. Ching. R.L
Dennis aad WJ1 Snyder, 1965. Summary of
Complex Terrain Model Evaluation. EPA
Publication No. BPA-600/3-85-060. US.
Environmental Protection Agency, Research
Triangle Park. NC (NTIS No. PB 65-236691)
15. Environmental Protection Agency,
1964. Interim Procedures for Evaluating Air
Quality Models (Revised). EPA Publication
No. EPA-450/4-44-O23. US. Environmental
Protection Agency. Research Triangle Park,
NC (NTIS No. PB 65-106060)
16. Environmental Protection Agency.
1965. Interim Procedures for Evaluating Air
Quality Modal*: Experience with
implementation. EPA Publication No. EPA-
450/4-85-406. US. Environmental
Protection Agency. Research Triangle Park,
NC (NTIS No. PB 65-242477)
17. Environmental Protection Agency,
1992. Protocol far Determining the Best
Perfafiiiing Modal EPA Publication No.
EPA-454/R-92-02S. US. Environmental
7. Environmental Protection
Guidelines on Air Quality Mod
r, 45(61): 20157-2015*.
ction Agency. 19B
r Models. Federal
8. Londergan. R.)., D.H. Mtnott DJ.
Wackier. T.Kincaid and D. Bontteta. 1982.
Evaluation of Rural Air Quality Simulation
Model*. EPA Publication No. EPA-4SO/4-
82-020. US. Environmental Protection
Agency. Research Triangle Park. NC (NTIS
No. PB 83-182758)
9. Londenan. R.J., D.H. Minott. D.J.
Wackier andRJL Fte, 1983. Evahiatton of
Urban Air Qaality Simulation Models. EPA
Publication No. BPA-450/4-63-02a US.
Environmental Protection Agency. Research
Triangle Park, NC (NTIS No. EB84-J41173).
lalondergan. R.J. and D.J. Wacktar, 1984,
Evaluation of Complex Terrain Air Quality
Simulation Models. EPA Publication No.
BPA-4SO/4-44-017.U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency. Research Triangk Park,
NC (NTIS No. PB 85-119485).
11. Pox. D.G., 1981. Judging Air Quality
Model Performance. Bulletin of the American
Meteorological Society. 62(5): 599-609.
Ssrtee
•OocuDMotl sat available to the f
or from me Nstioeal Technkal I
(NTIS) have been phoad In Docket No. I
ttwDodot an ihowa at !&••>*• "
• Soaat IPA nltnaem,•»«.. awdel •*'
etc.. SM psriovcsuy ievisso> UMsaraf
the SCRAM BBS i* to dowaload upesMs or
see Appsodbc A of Into appeadta. "A.O.
CTION AND AVAILABOmr.
NC
18. Environmental Protection Agency.
1992. Screening Procedures for Estimating
the Air Quality bnpact of Stationary Source*.
Revised. EPA Publication No. BPA-4S4/R-
92-019. US. Environmental Protection
Agency. Research Triangle Park. NC
19. Environmental Protection Agency,
1969. Support Center far Regulatory Air
ilsBuUeti - "
Niels
i Board System (SCRAM
BBS). Source Receptor Analysis Branch,
Research Triangle Park, NC (Docket Nos. A-
20. Environmental Protection Agency.
1992. SCREEN2 Model User's Guide. EPA
PubUcatton No. BPA-*50/4-92-006. US.
21. Environmental Protection Agency,
1967. EPA Complex Terrain Model
Development: Final Report. EPA Publication
No. EPA-600/3-8e-006. U.& Environmental
Protection Agency. Rasearrri Triangle Park,
NC (NTIS No. PB 68-162110)
22. Perry, S.G., D.J. Bum. Ui Adams. R.).
Paine. M-U Dennis, M.T. Mills, D;).
Strimaltis. R;). Yamattinn ami B.M. Intley.
1989. User's Guide to the
Dispersion Model PI
for
Volume 1;
Unstable Situations
Miidel Description and User Instructions.
EPA Publication No. BPA-flOOfv-69-041
V3. En
ction Agency.
C (NTIS No. P
Research Triangle Park. NC (NTIS No. PB
89-161424)
23. Milk. M.T., R.|. Paine. EA. bwley and
BA.Bjaa.l9ty. Tb- Complex Terrain
DltfMnkn MOM! Twcift Pfspwoswot?
System-user's Guide and Program
DeesriptioiLBPAPttbucationNo.EPA-600/
6-68-003. U.S. Bnvironmental Protection
-------
•agistar t Voi 59. No. 137 / Tuesday. July 20. 1993 / Rules and Ragulatkma
Agaacy. Nesaen*TTiBa»jle Park, NC. (NTIS
24.Fato*KJ«1997.UsaftGaid«tol)»
Mai
EPA
.{NTlSNal
riiiaiaTHaaa.ierairr crrmitn nr
88-18X103)
W-fJny. S.G, D.J. 9mm aad A.J
VdaaM3.1teScnamiasMoih(Cr
EPA PubttcaUott Na BPA-4W8-9j>-08r.
Reetareh Triaagta Pajk.MC (NTIS Na PB
91-138884)
38. Bart. B.W.. 1977.
R-B2-006. US.
Agency, R
36. Cole. HA tnd JM. Summethay*. 1979.
A Reriew of Tachnlouee Available I
Estimation of Shart-TenaNQi ^
. iMnMlofllw AtrPaUuHdb
Contral AaKKiottM. 29(8): 612-817.,
37. US. Departateeuof Himahgend Urban
Devetopmaat. I960. Air Qotlity
i AI^^MM^ P^^Ml^a tLS.
274064)
27.
THa»iia nrt. tr irrm Tin rn
^ ___
and h. US.
Region m. PttlacMpaia, PA. (NIB
89-148082 and PB 83-148100) .
2ft Ew
1981. Receptor Modal Tednkal Stria*,'
Volume I: Omrlew of Receptor Mode*
nK^BBJBCBBIBaBBl W OTBBJ^BWBBBWBJ aKBHi^iV
450/4-*t-OMa (NIB Na PB 83-139429);
VohuM ftCaerntanl MawBalaaca. BPA
NC.0fnsNM.pBn-i3in7.nM-
13U99, PB n-tnau. PB •vuato.
91-1312M. PB M-14B3I2. ud PB «-
iNa BPA-tSOM-OVOttb (NTIS
Na PB 82-187348); VohimM IB (Bsvised):
CUB Deer* Maval (VoisfaB »JO). EPA
na*eateNaBPA-t5tt+40*Ot|NTIS
No. PB mMmaant Votmaa IV;TocbaicaJ .
Conaidanllow ai Saawa ApvoitloBBMal By
PartfcMi Uaadfieabon.BPA PaaUeattoa Na
EPA-«SOM^3-018 (NTIS No, PB 84-
103340teVolBaaay:SiiwtaAj|inftiiaMem
CoodteiagllMarUaa. BPA Pobttotfoa Na
EPA-ISO/4-84-020 (NTB Na PB 85^
111834); VotoBe Vfc A Gulda To Tb* Uee of
Factor Aaaryria aad tauMpei negreitlnn
(FA/MB) Techaiauee la Soano
fljiliialluiiaianl BPA Pobtkcattoa Na EPA-
4SO/4-8S-007 (NTIS Na PB 88-107638).
39. Paoa. Tfi, 1982. Tta Bate of Iteoapto*
Modd* fcr R
Appraacfa^EPA
8ft-0ia. U.S. Bnvt
NaBA-tfiO/4-
No.PBtO-3M777)
(Docfcat Na A-MM8
40. BnvfnaoMBtal Pratactfoa) AgancT
1878. ffiiBBleuaMHar Oldttoaafar La
l»opta»h Plotting
VohiMailamaz
Nl»PBtO-a8.148*a^PB90-
«aak A^^^^t^^^l ^^89-OmUS.
Na.A-80-te.D-B-n)
43. Bnvtonnntol PratoElk» Agaacy.
19» Piatocdog VbOrfUtr Aa BPA Rmvt to
COogmt. BPAPtobHaMaB No. BPA-450«-
79-008. UA~
Pork. NC (NTIS No. PB W-38S418)
LBPA
Agaacy. RaMarch Triangk Park, NC (NTIS
NaPBSO-220330)
43. Bu»huiiai»l8iFhi8iclioa Agjancy.
1NZ. Woddnok far Plnnw Vltnal topact
I and AMlyria (RfftoadJ. BPA
i Na BPA-4S4/R-KHB3. UA
PabUcatk»No.BPA~«54« » 005. US.
Pa*. NC
R.W.B
PLUVUK MmW and tto EKT VUibUity
Model Bwd onHw tt7> VISTTA DaU Bate.
EPA Publication No. EPA-
> Eavitoniaeatal Protactiom Agency.
RMaarch Trtaagje Park, NC. (NTIS Na PB
83-164723)
4S. WbUe, WJI» C Seigneur. D.W.
Hainatd. M.W.EU8RK&. L.W. Richard*. P.T
Roberts, P.S. Bbatdwa|a. WJ9. Cooner «nd
WX. WiUon. fc,. 1985. PttdicUag Ik*
Visibility of Cbbnaay Phuaat: An,
Intarconiparitoa of Four Models with
Obmvatioas at a W«U-Cb«trotM Powac
Plant Atnoapharlc EBviianmanl. t9Uk 515-
528.
48. Enviroomenial Protection Agaacy.
!««. Guideline far Determination of Good
Engineering Piactica Stack Height fTadiBkal
Support DocuBMnt tor Ilia Stack rteigbl
ReguUtloos). Raviaad. EPA Publication No,
TTrt IMV4 BO OT1IL U.S. Eavironn»e&Ul
Protection Agency.!
NC (NTIS No. PB 85-22&M1)
47. Environmental Protactiaa Agency.
1981. GuidaHna fat Uee of Fluid Modaling to
DalaraHn* Pond Bnajnaoring Ptacttea CGEP1
Stack KtigAt EPA Publication No. EPA-4SO/
4-81-003. US. Envimunantal Protection
• Agency, R*teaich Triangle Pa*. NC (NTB
NaPB 82-1453X7)
48. Lawson. Jr.. R.E. and W.H. Snydac.
HIM n.t.^nL.ti^ ^r^.ic.^l.^ag
Study to a Powac Pbnt BPA PuoUcauon No.
EPA-aoo/3-8a-O24. US. EauiroBDMBUl
NC (NTIS Na PB 83-407407)
49. Snydax, W M. aad BA. Lnnoa. Jr..
1985. Plttld M^t.ny- n—^.^..^- ^r^Jt
EngiaeMii«-PmcUeo Stack Height in
Couplax Tanain. SPA PubliaUion No. EPA-
600/3-85-022. US. Enviroainaatai
Protection Agaacy, Baeaarth Triangte Park.
NC (NTIS No. PB 85-203107)
50. Tornar.DA.1959. Workbookof
Atmoiposrk: Dispanioa Ectimatai. PHS
PublicatkiiiNa999-AP-2o.US.DepartiBeiU
of Health. Brtacedoo aait Walaga. PuUic.
Health Senrtoa. OadanaU. OH. (NTIS Na
PB-191482)
51. McElroy.)!. and P. Pooler. )r, 1988.
StUnnaPiaponiamSt»dy.VofcttnoB-.
Analysis NatioaaiArrPoUutina Control
Administration PabUntioaNaAP-53. OS
I
nrtpeitmnnt nf Heallh.
Walfan. Public Haaltb Sanrioa.
VA. (NTIS No. PB-1902&S)
niiiiniikni A rnmnarinm at riawaial ~iiyine
Srfcamai louia.iofCBn>atoaadA»pttaor
Meteorology. 22; 92-114.
RMeatcbon Dittttatoa to AtaoiphaTte
Boundary Uyom A PaahtoB Panar OB Statue
and Need*. EPA Publication No, EPA-600/3-
25-072. Ui. EovboBBeatal Piatactiov
Agency. ReeawdiTtiaBgla Park. NC (NTIS
No. PB 86-122387)
__, tiaCaiiittoPlurBo
Modaaag.Paa P. PnariMa BanatraiBanti far
BPA
dung* ia UMTonat Wvkfaook Valuem. EPA
PttUfcattOB Na BPA-4WO/4-7«-a30b. US.
Hal iimimenial PmiacUoa Agaacy. Reeearch
Triaagto Po>k.NC (NTIS No. PB-2t80387
3BA)
-------
F*denl Kagteter / VoL 50, No. 137 / Tiutday, July 20. 1993 / Rules and Regulation* 38845
t
55. Turner, DA. 1964. A Dtffnston Model
for an Urban Area. Journal of Applied
Meteorology, 3(1): 6»4n.
56. Brigg*. G.A.. 1975. Phone Rise
Prediction*. Chapter 3 in Lectures on Air
PoUuttonud Environmental Impact
Analyses. Amarican Meteorological Society.
Boston, MA: pp. 59-111.
57. Hanna, S-tL, G.A. Briggs and HP.
Hoakar. Jr.. 1982. Plume JU». Chapter 2 in
EPA
Publication No. PA-600/4-aa-OSOR. US.
Triangle Park. NC
68,lrwin. J.S., 198a DUpenkm Estimate
ion *o:Brtimatton of Pasqulll •'
Categories. U^. Bnvironmanad
Handbook on Atmospheric I
Technical Information Center. US.
Department of Energy, Washington, DC; pp.
11-24. DOE/TIC-11223 (DB 820020*5)
58. Environmental Protection Agency,
1992. User's Odds for the industrial Source
Complex (ISC2) Dispersion Models. Volume*
1, 2 and 3. EPA Publication No*. EPA-450/
4-92-OOBa-c. US. Environmental Protection
Agency. Research Triangle Park. NC (NTIS
Nos.PB-92-232461, PB 92*232453. and PB
92-232479. respectively)
59. bwin, J.S., 1978. Proposed Criteria for
Selection of Urban Versus Rural Dispersion
Coefficients. (Draft Staff Report). Meteorology
and AMenmenOMvision.
AMDCV* RMMUTCB THuDCM Pttnit
NC (Docket Na A-60-46. 04-10)
69. Mitchell. Jr.. AA and K.a Timbre. *
1979. Atmospheric Stability Chmfrpm
HorisooteU Wfnd FwctUettUxi* PnMnitM ttt
72nd Annual Meeting of Air Pollution
Control Association, Cincinnaii. OH; June
24-29. 1979. (Docket No. A-80-46, D-P-9)
70. Nuclear Regulatory Cnmmlsrinn, 1972.
Meteorological Programs In Support of
Nuclear Power PJants. Regulatory Guide 1.23
(DRAFT). US. Nuclear Regulatory
. OfflCV Of StOTCllIQl
•Mangle Park. NC (Docket No. A-40-M. D-
B-8T .
60. Auer. Jr., A.H., 1978. Correlation of
Land Use and Cover with Meteorological
Anomalies. Journal of Applied Meteorology.
17(5): 636-843.
61. Brier. G.W.. 1979. Validity of the Air
Quality Display Model Calibration
Procedure. EPA Publication NttBPA-g4-73-
017. US. Environmental Protection Agency,
Reieaich Triangle Park. NCtNTIS No. PB-
.
Development, Washington, DC (Docket No.
A-8IM6.II-F-11)
71. Smedman-Hogftrom. A. and V.
Hogstrom. 1978. A Practical Method for
Determining Wind Frequency Distributions
for the Lowest 200m from Routine
Meteorological Data. Journal of Applied
Meteorology. 17(7): 942-954.
72. Smith. T.B. and SM. Howard. 1972,
Methodology for Treating DiflusMt*. MH 72
FR-103a Meteorology Research, me.
ntal Protection Agency, 1965
216716)
82. Bavin
and ft Co
Factor*. Volume I: Stationary Pout and Area
Source* (Fourth Edition: GPO Stack No. 055-
000-00251-7), and Supplements: Volume ft
Mobile Sources (NTIS PB 87-205266) and
Supplementd). EPAPufalicattcm NoAP-42.
U.S. Envuimiiiiiiitu JTOtecuop ALVRDGIT*
Research Triangle Park. NC
63- BovlxcMDyoDuiiitti ProtBCtton AjHOBt»y»
1987. Ambient Air Monitoring Guideline* for
Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD).
BPA Publication No. EPA-450/4-87-007.
rotvcotti A^ncyi-
1984, Calms Pmoaaear (CALMFRO) User's
Guide. EPA Publication Na BPA-QQl^M-
001 > U-St Bp¥iMCUiii>iiteil P^vliW*uoB AMDCT*
Region t, Boston, MA. (NTIS No. PB 84-
229467)
74. Burton. CS., 1981. The Role of
Atmospheric Models in Regulatory Decision-
Mudflgj* Smnmiy Ripcitt. SyfUmu
Applications, me.. San Rahel. CA. Prepared
contract No, 68-01-5645 farUA
Triangle Park. NC (Docket No. A-60-M. 0-
M-6)
76. BnThonment«l Protection Agency.
1961. Proceeding* of the Second Conference
kiB Agncy»
Research Triangle Park. NC (NTIS NaPB
90-168030)
64. Lendsbers, HE. and WX. Jacobs. 1961.
ndium of Meteorology.
Compendium
Meteorological Sodety^Boston. MA; pp..
976-492. '
65. Burun.es.. TASt
Nordln. 1983. The Ti
i of
US. Environmental Protection Agency,
Reeearch Triangle Park. NC (DocketNo. A-
80-46. n-M-16)
76, HUM. SJt. 1962. Natural Variability
of Onsaued Hourty SO» andCO ^ ^
Environment. 16(6): 1435-1440. •
77. Pttx.DA.1963. Uncertainty at Ah*
Quality Modeling. Bulletinof the/ '
1 Society. 65(1): 27^16.
76. Bowne, MB.. 1981. Validation ind
Metecrotogii^DataSetKlmpjatoisfarAIr
^JtUwl^T •DBDOCt ACeWilOlfiiWtt* eHFfltHQBi)' * •
Applications, Inc.. San Rafael, CA. (Docket
No. A-60-46. D-C-11)
asts.
Criteria for Ah-QnaliQiMadele:
Put Air Quality Modelmg and the
Air Afftr
BPA Publketton No. WA-4SO«-83-001.
U-S- ttoyliWBBMitii Pntvction AMtinr,
Renal eh Triangle Park, NC (NTS No. PB
83-260610)
61. Rhoads. R.G., 1981. Accuracy of Air
Quality Models. Staff Report US.
Envbonmental Protection Agency, Research
Triangle Park. NC (Docket Na A-80-M, 0-
G-6)
82. Paeauill. P.. 1974. Atmospheric
DUbisian. 2nd Edition. John Wiley and Sons.
New York, NY; 479 pp.
83. Austin, B£., TA Stoeckenhu, M.C
Dudik and T.& Stocking. 1988. User1! Guide
Systems Applications, Inc., San Rafiel. CA.
Prepared under Contract No. 68-02-4352
Option I for the US. Environmental
reelection Agency, Research Triangle Park.
NC (Docket No. A-88-04, IW-3)
64. Thrall. A.D.. T.B. Stoeckenlus and CS.
Burton. 1985. A Method far Calculating
Dispersion Modeling Uncertainty Applied to
tht Btgiilstifm "*•" Hm|««|ffn S*mrrt •
Systems Applications, Inc.. San Rafael. CA.
\ far the US. Environmental
L A0H)Cy, JWMUCh TrilBgl* PiUltt
^J*!1*0- A-60^46.iy-G-l)
85. Envtronrnentil Protection Agency.
1981. Plan far Evaluating Model
FvfaninttGi** StiiuRaipOiTt- U*S*
iTii«>4gtiBTiiiis«»iw8it PmJ!nBffHn8B A*8Mftt*y| PaiBem»*r4t
Tringto Park. NC (Docket NaA-80-W.n-
OtiKUO& AgttCy •
1979. Gnideline far the Interpretation of
Oxooa Air QnaUty Standard*. EPA
Publication Na ffA 450/4-79-003. U.S.
1987. C»SiteMeteorologlcaLPiogram.
Guidance for Regulatory Modeling ,
Applications. BPA Publication Na EPA-450/
4-87-013. U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency. Research Triangle Park. NC (NTO
NaPB 67-227542)
67. EDvironmentsi Protection Agency,
1989. Quality Assurance for Air Pollution
nt Systems. Volume IV—
Society. Bosun, MA; pp. 159-171. |
NaA-80-4e>D-A*106)
79. Bowne. Ni and R.J. Londergan, 1963.
Oenrlew. Results, and Coaclnstmu for the
BPRIPhmie Model Validation and
Developnient Proiect: Plains Site. EPRIBA-
3074. Electric Power Research Institute. Palo
Alto,CA. .
SO. U«M««1 O B , T • StnarfcaiiliM tad PiA
Stewart. 1962. A Sumy of Statistical
i of Model I
> Park, NC (NTIS.No. PB-292271)
67. Environmental Protection Agency.
1974. Guidelines for Air Quality
Itf^iJIltattlifjfji PhMMJIHal Ift^l Aflitlyitl, VollEPBHl
12: Applytttf Ataospheric Simulation
Models to Anr Quality Maintenance Areas,
BPA Publication No. BPA-450/4-74-013.
US. Environmental Protection Agency,
Research Triangle Park, NC (NTISNo. PB-
237750)^ ^__
66. BeftvlRMfflpMitii nolKttott AjftDcy*
1977: Guideline* far Interpretation of Air
Quality Standards (Revised). OAQPS No.
13-006. VS. Environmental Protection
Agency. Research Triangle Park. NC (NTIS
Mo. PB 81-196420)
89. Bnwtnmnental Protection Agency,
1966. Barissian* Trading Policy Statement;
General IWKdpIerfar Creation. Banking, and
Use of Bmisefan Reduction Credits. Federal
V 61(133): 43814-13860.
land
>. 1967. User1* Guide to the Rough
Model (RTDM). Rev. 3.20.
No. P-D535-S&5.
Reeiaich and Technology,
Inc.. Concord. MA. {Docket No. A-80-»8. IV-
D-<)
H. Bums. DJ..S.G. Perry ana A.J.
OmoreUl, 1991. An Advanced Screening
Model far Complex Terrain Applii
Paper presented at the 7th Joint Coai
onAppllcMiansofAirl
Meteorological Sodety and the Air ft Waste
Management Association). January 13-18.
1991,
LA.
-------
/ Vol. 58. No. 137 / Tnawiay, July 20, 1903 / Ruin and RagulatJoiu
92. Pany, &C., IMS. CTDMPLUS: A
"
. Ftt"t is i wnDloui
Journal ef Applied Msteanlogy. 31(7): 633-
. 9XFtamier. MX. S£. Perry and nj.
Boras, 1992. CTDMPLU5: A Dispersion
Complex
Characteristics. Journal of Applied
Meteorology. 31(7): 816 660.
94. fbrtroomeotal Protection Agency.
I960. Evaluation of Mobile Souna Air
Quality Simulation Models. EPA Publication
Ma BPA-tSO/4-88-003. US. Environmarta]
Protection Agaacy.Resserdi Triangle Park.
NC (NTIS NaPB •6-107293)
95. Shannon, )J>.. 1987. Mobil* Soon*
ModaHng Review. A report prepared under •
cooperative agreement with the
Enviioinitiitrtal PfflleciUii Agency. (DwAet
No.A-M-04.IH-2)
96. HiivtraiiBentalProtectiM Agency.
1991.
EPA Publication Nal
fNTTSNo. PB9M71B2B); Pert fc The ROM
EPA-600/8-«0~083b (NTIS NaPB 91-
171934): Part 3: The Con Model. EPA
PubUcatkni No. EPA-600/8-90-083C (NTIS
Protection Agracy, Resettch Triangle Park,
NC
184. Chug. J&, RA. Brest. LSJL Mdcsen.
S. MadnndCBvP. Mtddbton. WJL f
•ndCJ.Waleck.1987.
Eulerian Add DeposltloB Model: Physla
Concepts and Pormolanon. Joamal of
Geophysical Research. 92(012): 14681-
1470a
105. a
I far Applying and 1
the CMB. US. Environmental T
Agency. EPA Publication Na EPA-450/4-
87-oia. r— ......
Plan*. ETA ftrtitodoB Na EPA8O/4-Ql
92-112150)
97.1
ik.NCfNTlSNo.PB
Anaqr,
1992. CuiddiM tar
of the Uifau AMMd
Cnbaa Maoaaddk EPA PuhHeaJton No.
EPA-4SO/4-92-01I ludb. tt& -
EoriroiinwiiW Protection Afsncy. HMMKB
Pvfc.NC (N1IS NOB. PB 92-213222
Agency, Research Triangle Park. NC (NTB
NaPB 67-206496)
106. Environ
1087. Protocol i
Among Receptor and Dtepi
BPA Publication NB>_EPA-450/4-87-OB8.
RMeercbTMengte Park. NC (NTIS NO.'PB
87-206604)
EB-91-3, nraKttvvly. United SUtM Air
Fon» PubUcabon Nm BSI<-TR-66-83 nd
55; ESL-TR-91-31. mpKHnhr. Fwtoral
Aviation AdninMntkm, OfBa* of
Eariraanwnt «nd tMtgf, WuUngton. DC
(NTIS Not ADA 199003, ADA 199794. wd
ADA240S26. iMptcd^ly) ______
.114. Envinnxmratu Pratwlioo AABDCV,
1992. WatOoak of Sawiing TecJmiqvM for
AsMMiog bBptet* ofTadc Air Pollutontt
(R«yUedI EPA PtdriieMioa No. BPA-4S4/R-
92-024. U.S. EmfaaBMrtd Pratoction
Ayncy. Kt»MicB-M«i>gi« Pnk. NC
mV?*»Ml«MMMM*M§Al V^^^MHtt^tafe A^^H»«^
< MWironiPBDiiH nwciiQn AMDCJ*
1990.UMf • Cukte toTSCKBBN: A Model for
Sawning ToxJc AirPaUntant
Conoantntion*. EPA PoblloMioa No. EPA-
450/4-90-013. US. Bmirannmtd
gncy.
NC (NTIS No. PB 91-141620)
116. EnvboBBMBMl PratMd
DtavoaM&CPA PabUGMta No. BPA-<4SO/
. U&El
1989. Hasardoos Waste TSDPI
Parttodate Matter Air Emission* <
DocumenL BPA PabUcMion Na EPA-4SO/3-
69-019. VS. BttvironmeniBl Pratoction
Agency. Research Triangle Park. NC (NTIS
NaPB 90-103250)
117. BnarfrnaiaBtel Protection Agency.
1969. Procedural far Conducting Air
Pathway Analyses far Snerfund
Applications. Volame I AnpMcatinns of Air
Palkwn Anatysesfor Soperiund ActMnea '
and Volume IV Proosduns for Dteneoien
•nd
98. BBvltaammtkl Pratadka Agnqr.
1992. Tedmical Support Doanwat to Aid
State* with DM Dnttnmm of Cuban
MoBoadd* SW* InptemuMioB Pbn. EPA
Publtatfcn HaJgA-4S2/R-92^)03. US.
Emliommitil PfOtKtJOB AgMey, Rttaaica
THangh Pirfc. NC (NTB No. PB 92-233065)
Ml* BttVJKiHilMlliB)! JTOlMtlOB AflBSCy*
196*. BraluatloB of Shoft-T«m Loa^lngt
Transport Model*. VolumM I ud IL EPA
PubliMtiM* Nat. EPA-4SO/4-M-016 • nd b.
VS. Envinaunentml Protection Agrocy,
R8WKCbTllMjl.PMk.NC POlS N«». PB
•7-142337 ad PB S7-142345)
100. MdNidv. RT, 1067. Rntew of Start-
i THMMl* PMfc. NC (NTB
NaPB66-206319) __,_ _
106. BniiOBMBfil PfotacbOM AgMcjr.
1967. PM-10 SIP EXwtopoMBt Gulddfm
EPA PuUiaHlo9N&EPA-4Mra-«*-0m.
niiiii«iiiTi>Mihra> rr (inrrriii rn
87-209466)
109. *• illllll PwtaettOB AflMV.
_ . _ iPirlt.NCiNTIS
Nos. PB 88-113374 and PB 69-113383)
116- Enviniuiiralu PmtAcUm A^ilicy*
1986.AbpiepennoB ModeUngas Applied to
Introduction Pot the Permit Writer. VS.
Envingmaatel Pit
rTte PM-10 NAAQS. EPA
PublteitiaB Ma EPA-450/4^67-012. US.
Trkngb PtttNC (Docket No. A-66-04, B-
MO) ______ ^._
•llff. HnvlniBinenfal Protection Agtncy.
1989. VS. BPA Ofltoi of Toxic
I
Trta&glePark. NC (NTB Na PB 87-206191)
110. Seelak. M. U ud A. B, Biebe^ 1686.
SASBM Slnnrie Appmek Snake
• __Lr _ •••
uodw • coopmtiTC flpMOHBl wttk lot
EnviiD&amttl Piattc
NO.A-66-04.IH-10)
Technlotl Note 362. BLM/YA/PT-4«>003 *
TOOO-ATCilaUel
DMrflMOon SecbM. BLM Sanrtoi «
(SC-068B). OettMT. CO6O229-OD47. (NTB
NaPB 90-168663)
GvJdt ad GAMS Vtnk» 24
User-tGalde (DRAFT}. PHpeied under
amtnctNo.06-02-O481fartheU^.
Pmtecnon Agency,
Washington
SaudB-f-
120.
DC (Docket No. A-88-04.
-13)
PBtB-to. .
Part DI-Testeof NuMrictl Aleorithms. BPA
Publication NOB. EPA-60oy3-83-03S. BPA-
6000-64-088. and BPA 600/3 8B-O37. US.
Agency.
Nov. PB
Mangle Park, NC (NTIS Nos. PB 63-207668.
PB»4-232«51.endPB8»-203818,
M,AlsM.T.L.
of DM
11.1
MenpaftDto
Pmhlami BPA
• Agency, 1969. ftodDook of Chemical Htaard
• Analysis Piousdnxva. Avauaole OB iMuest by
1*, W-^l—^_,§ «LM^^HM.MM^ ft^Mw««^w^^*
wnung tot reoerai Bn»igtncy Msmgeiaent
Agency, PabBcattosrOatos. SOOCStiMl
SW, Weshington. DC 20472.
121. ai.iiuumeiiul Protection Agency.
1987. Technioil Goidao» far Haards
AnalysU: Emmg«M.y Planing far Extmnety
102.Yovni,
«!.. 1969.
at
1989. The
(OCD) Uodtl,
VohcawBiA
forMinmlt
I: Dear's Guide,
4
NaA-«8-04.
SerrteesbySignM
WeftfanLMA.(DDC*»t
122.
1998.
Afsncy,
No. EPA
NC (NTIS NaPB 69-194252)
1991. The Regional Oadoot Model (ROM)
User's Guide. Parti: The ROM T
1986. A Mknvonipalar PoUuoon Model
Ctauu Atnarts ad Ah- Fora* BO
Description. Model Application and
ad EDMSUser'sCuide (June
^
Directive 9285.9-1. OBc* of RemedW
RespoiiM.WBiUngtoa. DC 20460. (NTIS Na
PB 99-135859)^
123.
1989.
Publication Nos. PAA BB 66 iod»;PAA- 136592]
136592)- -
Technical Support DncMtnent. (Met of
.DCaoMO.(NTlSNo.PB8»-
-------
K^uter / VoL 58. Kb. 137 J Tawday. July 20, 1493 / Roles mad fegufetions 38647
I
124.
System User'* Guide
. Office of
Pesticide* and Toxic Substances, Exposure
Evaluation Drrtooa, Washington. DC 20490.'
125. EfkviionfQQiit&l
1989. Risk A
NC (NTis NO , p> w^mooy
• 134. ZnvtattBttOBtal
1987.
Coastal Fumigation Model*.
No. EPA-45C/4 «T081.U.S.
Protertk* Agency. ReeeaichTiteigte Pa*.
NC.
135. Irvrin. JJS.. J.O. Paumier and K.W.
Bfode. 1988. Meteorological Processor far
Reguiatory Models (MPRM 1.2) User's Guide.
EPA Publication No. EPA-600/3-»*M)431t
U.S. Environmental ftotoclluu Asjeacy.
ResearcbTrtegtePark.NCTNTBNo.PB
89-TT7526)
13.0
American UalasHnlBglwl Sariaty. 1S7I-
1985. Syaaosia OB Tu^uhaoe. Dimuaoo.
aad Air Mautiom (lrt-7lW- Boston. MA.
_
Agency*
frr
Superfund. Voter* 1: Human Hemuh
Evaluation Manual Part A. (Interim Find).
OSVVER Directive 928&7-01*. Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, -
Washington. DC 20460.
126. EnTUomnental Protection Agency.
1986. User** Mamml far the Human Exposure
Model (HEM). EPA Publication No. EPA-
450/5-86-001. Office of Air Quality Flawing
and Standard*. Research Triangle Park. MC
27711.
127. EavfeMuaeoml Protection Agency.
1992. A Tiered Modeling Approach far
Assessing the Glossary of Term*
Air quality Ambient poUutent
concentratteaoani their temporal and spatial
distribution.
Algorithm: A specific mathematical
raksjlat in* yutmilt**. A model may contain
several algorithm*.
BueiijMuatt Ambienl poUatant
concentration* due to (1) •aturaleouroas. (21
currently under coniideration; and (3)
measured airquality data (e.g.. an adjaetanent
bated on hull «juai 1 1 Unear aegmnioa).
Calm: For pupoaa* of ak qnality
nsadeUagrOiBi i*nsed to denae toe sitoatioA
when the wind I* indeterminate with regard
tospeedordicecdoA.
Complex Terrain: Terrain ma-neding the
height oi the atack being modeled.
ConyrtlerCeah: A «et at stateauini* that
comprise a computer program.
Evaluate To appraise the padnmanue am
accuracy of a model based on a comparison
id in a
quality
lO^d
wind
okannel to
-------
38848 Federal Register / Vol. SB. No. 137 / Tuesday. July 20. 1993 / Rules and Regulations
quantitatively evaluate the influence of "
building* and/or terrain on pollutant
concentrations.
Fugitive Dutt: Dust discharged to the
atmosphere ta an unconfined flow stream
such a* that from unpaved roads, storage
piles and heavy construction operations. .
Model: A quantitative or mathematical
representation or simulation which attempts
to describe the characteristics or
relationships of physical events.
Preferred Model; A refined model that is
recommended for a specific typo o*
regulatory application.
Receptor: A location at which ambient air
quality is measured or estimated.
Acceptor AfooMr: Procedures that examine
an ambient monitor sample of paniculate ..
matter and the conditions of its collection to-
infer the types or relative mix of sources
impacting on it during collection.
Refined Model: An analytical technique
that provides a detailed treatment of physical
and chemical atmospheric processes and
requires detailed and precise input data.
Specialized estimate* are calculated that are
useful for evaluating source impact relative
to air quality standards and allowable
increments. The estimates are more accurate
than those obtained from conservative .
screening techniques.
Rollback: A simple mode! that assumes
that if emissions from each source affecting
a given receptor are decreased by the same
percentage, ambient air quality
air
da
• proportionately.
Scneiiiiu reeJutioue.- A relatively simple
analysis technique to determine if a given
source is likely to pose a threat to air quality.
Concentration estimates from screening
Simple Terrain: An area when terrain
features are all lower in elevation than the
top of the stack of the source. •
Wef Part 51—
Air Quality Models
Summaries of
Table of Content* .. .
AM Introduction and Availability
A.1 Buoyant Line and Point Source
Dispersion Model (BLP)
A.2 CAUNE3
AJ dimatological Dispersion Model (COM
2.0)
A.4 Gaussian-Plume Multiple Source Air
Quality Algorithm (RAM)
A3 Industrial Source Complex Model
(ISO)
A.6 Multiple Point Gaussian Dispersion
Algorithm With Terrain Adjustment
(MPTER)
A.7 Single Source (CRSTER) MODEL
A.8 Urban Airshed Model (U AM)
A.9 .Ofishore and Coastal Dispersion Model
A.10 Emissions and Dispersion Model
System (BDMS)
A.1! Complex Terrain Dispersion Model
Phis Algorithms for Unstable situations
(CTDMPLUS)
AJtEP References
(Availability
i key features of
AJO
This .. _.-.
NuIWd Uf ^Uvity rWHWrt pfniBfHMl f0T •
specific regulatory applications. For each
il, information is provided on
availability, approximate cost in 1990.
regulatory use, data input, output format and
options, simulation of atmospheric physics.
and accuracy. These models may be used
without a formal demonstration of
applicability provided they satisfy the
recommendations for regulatory use; not all
options in the models are necessarily •
recommended for regulatory use. f,
Many of these models have been subjected
to a performance evaluation using *
comparisons with observed air quality data.
A summary of such comparisons for models
contained in this appendix is included in "A
Survey of Statistical Measures of Model
Performance and Accuracy for Several Air
Models." EPA-450/4-83-001. Where
i. several of the models contained
have been subjected to evaluation
i, including (l) statistical
performance tests recommended by the
American Meteorological Society and (2)
peer scientific reviews. The models in this
appendix have been selected on the basis of
the results of the model evaluations.
experience with previous use. familiarity of
the model to various air quality programs,
and the costs and resource requirements for
use. - i
The Availability statement for models in
this Appendix that rents to the User's
NetworkforApplied Modeling of Air
Pollution (UNAMAP) should be ignored
since UNAMAP is no longer operationaL
However, all models and user's
• documentation in this appendix an available
from: Computer Products. National Technical
Information Service (NTIS). U.S. Department
of Commerce, Springfield. VA 22161, Phone:
(703)487-4650.
In addition, model codes and selected.
abridged user's guides are available from the
Support Center for Regulatory Air Models
Bulletin Board System "(SCRAM BBS).
telephone (019) 541-5742. The SCRAM BBS
is an electronic bulletin board system
designed to be user friendly and accessible
from anywhere in the country. Model users -
use the SCRAM BBS to download current
model OT^fft and text files.
A.1 BuoyaaaUne and Point Source
Dispersion Model (BLP)
Schuhnan. Lloyd L, and Joseph S. Sdre.
1980. Buoyant Line and Po
>(BLP)
Dispersion Model User's Guide. Document
P-7304B. Environmental Research and
Technology, Inc.. Concord. MA. (NTIS No.
PB4J-1MMZ)
Availability . .
This model is available as part of
UNAMAP (Version 6). The computer code is
available on magnetic tape from: Computer
Products. National Technical. Information
Servcce. U•&• Department of •7nBgM*>*ifr*i
Springfield, VA 22161. Phone: (703) 467-
4650. -
Abstract:
reduction plants, and other industrial, sources
where plume rise and downwash effects from
stationary line sources an important
a. Recommendations for Regulatory Use
The BLP model is appropriate for the
following applications:
Aluminum reduction plants which contain
buoyant, elevated line sources;
Rural areas;
Transport distances less than SO
kilometers; •
•' Simple terrain; and
One hour to one year averaging times.
The following options should be selected
for regulatory applications:
Rural (IRU-t) mixing height option;
Default (no selection) for plume rise wind
shear (LSHEAR), transitional point source
plume rise (LTRANS), vertical potential
temperature gradient (DTHTA), vertical wind
speed power law profile exponents (PEXP).
mairf^nflffi variation in number of stability
classes per hour (1OELS), pollutant decay
(DECFAQ. the constant in Briggs' stable
plume rise equation (CONST2), constant in
Briggs' neutral plume rise equation
(CONST3), convergence criterion for the line
source calculations (CRTD, and maximum
iterations allowed for line source calculations
(MAXIDiand
Terrain option (TERAN) set equal to 0.0.
0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0.
For other applications, BLP can be used if
it can be demonstrated to give the same
estimates as a recommended model for the
same application, and will subsequently be
executed in that mode.
BLP can be used on a case-by-case basis
with specific options not available in a
recommended model If it can be
demonstrated, using the criteria in section
3.2. that the model is more appropriate for a
specific application.
b. Input Requirement* :_. -.
Source data: Point sources require stack
location, elevation of stack base, physical
stack height, stack inside diameter, stack gas
exit velocity, stack gas exit temperature, and
pollutant emission rate. Line sources require
coordinates.of the end points of the line,
release height, emission rate, average line
source width, average building width,
een buildi
average spacing bet
spaci
line
ings, and
BLP is a Gaussian plume i
designed to handle unique modeling
problems associated
model
avenge line source buoyancy parameter.
Meteorological date: Hourly surface
weather data from punched cards or from the
preprocessor program RAMMET which
provides hourly stability class, wind
direction, wind speed, temperature, and
mixing height
Receptor data: Locations and elevations of
receptors, or location and size of receptor
grid or request automatically generated
receptor grid.
c Output
Printed output (from a separate post-
processor program) includes:
Total concentration or. optionally, source
contribution analysis; monthly and annual
frequency distributions for 1-, 3-, and 24-
hour avenge concentrations; tables of 1-, 3-.
and 24-hour average concentrations at each
receptor table of the annual (or length of run)
average concentrations at each receptor.
f
-------
58. No. 1S7 /
Jiiy 20, Mea /
t
be.
Setae. J.S~ and L.L.
BLP my be used to mods! primary *
pollutants. Tills nodal doe* not treat settling
and depaeWaa.
SF.ItMBerDalawdSOi
AlumhinmRaductk)aPlutfaLAFCA
Specialty Coafmoca an Mapanian
Madalby for OonplaxSoaraat, St Ionia,
.MO.
AJ CALIND
CALINB-a b a Gaussian pluma
CAUNB-3 nay be mad to model primiy
poUutmts.
BLP treats up to SO point sources. 10
parallel Ua»*ouBDee.aad lOOnoqilOB
• • l> 'ttmmmttmn I mi inai • • i
•mtnBmr esnaieau
User-iaput topngrspfale elevation is
applied far aachftackaad Bach noepU*.
g. ^waiie •aeiBVier
BLP USM phiBM rise firandas of Sdndmaa
fMI, MW CMJM3-A
Nspmion Modal far PiwUcttB* Ak
Polluta
StrwtB. IntwiiD Rvpoft* R0pai1 NuniMf
FHWA/CAIIb-TMS. ftdanl Hajhwmy
AdmlnUtrmtton. Washington, DC (NTB Ma.
PB 80-220S41)
_
VartloJ Brtirttil tampmtun
0.02 KiMn paraBtarfarE strtiBty «nd
0.035 Kelvtn per mMr •nosed tor «tsbl
pliuaa rise csJculatiooi. An option for mar
input nluai I* Included.
TraniiUoMl rise is utad far Una soureas.
Optfop tpt-|—.1— B^JI^MBAlfl^pk* ••••ttt ttt+ ••^BMjAriiebJ ami
finiiiipn iwwmoDv unoi wm WBCH pi
toad^tevHtouquiil&llm***
\ hujghl; uaiforai ort alug to
•ttJHI
uAm
CMBa,S.H at at. 1WB. R0anltsor«s»
GaDanlMotataauUabil
Bxparimant.GMR-aiOr.
Souica data: Up toM
aasad aa*^t-pada."»
Dabberdt. W. F.. 1978. Studies of Air
Quality OB and Neat Highways, ftojact 2711.
•».. ^_ _ • •*^^*^BjaBj«li ta^aartfctatiai i^eeisiBW VaifliiV sT*>
BJB)
UflMt (MCaty* Dvcty nta !• input bythetMaaW*
O)M2j>OlneMla|teei
• i J jet a a 4V SB ffm^^^_
l5J.9dM.-tg
Buoyant UMvadVatat Sous
DiapantoB Modal User's Guide. P-7MW.
-------
J8850 . Federal Register / Vol. 58, No. 137 / Tuesday, July 20; 199* / Rules and Regulations
available e* nugMttettpe ton: Goamiter
Products. National Technical Information
t Of
Springfield. VA 22181. Phone: (703) 487-
.4890.
AosCract • •
CDMUadimatologicaltteady-ttate
Cautsian plume model far determining long-
term (seasonal or annual) arithmetic average
. pollutant concentrations at any ground-level .
receptor in an urban ana.
a. Recommendation* for Ragulattuy Use
CDM is appropriate for the following
applications:
Point and am
Urban anas;
Plat terrain:
Transport distance* less man SO
kilometers.
Long term averages over one month to one
year or longer.
The following option should ba selected
for regulatory applications;
Set the regulatory "default option"
(NDEF-1) which automatically select* stack
tip downwaab. final plume rise, buoyancy-
induced dispersion (BID), and the
appropriate wind profile exponent*.
Enter "O" tor pollutant half-Ufa far all
pollutants except for SO] in an urban setting.
This entry results la no decay (infinite half-
life) being calculated. For SO» in an urban
setting, the pollutant half-life (in hours)
should beset to 4.0. •• -
b. Input Requirements
Source data: Location, average emissic
g*
ratM and bright* of amlntont far
ana MUTCM. Point
point and
alao include stack gat tamptatura. Made gai
nit wiodty, and Mack Ittdda diamatar nr
plunw riM calculations for point MUZCM.
Meteorological data: Stability wind tot*
(STAR deck dqr/nigbt vnrion). avenga
mixing height and wind tpMd In Men
(lability category, «nd avenge air
Racvptor data: Ctrtetira coordloatef of
c. Output
Printed output inchidaK
A«W*M concanttatiott* far the periodof
only) at each lacaplai. and
Optional point and ana concantiatioa rote
for each tacapttv. .
CDM is a climatological Gaussian plume
auaar any
ground to
ri thatappliaa to all
i ban
nee and
receptor aie treated.
g. Piume Beoorfor
CDM uses Brlggs (1909,1971,1975) plume
rise equations. Optionally a plume riw-wiud
id product may be Input for each poujt
souiue.
Stack tip <
(1974) is i
ih equation from Brigg*
I far regulatory use. The
I and Bowers (1982) equation Is also
included.
No phune rise is calculated for area
sources*
Does not treat hunigation or building
downwash.
h-HoiigoatolWInat
Wind data an input as a stability wind
rose (Joint frequency distribution of 16 wind
direction*. B wind classes, end S stability
i for the
9 (BPAfl 1990} Wat
the anaaxoietaf height i* at 1OO meton.
L Vertical Wind Sp~d
Vertical wind fpeed U ataumed equal to
Polluta&ta an aiiiimad avanly dlatziDutad
acraat a 2X5 or 1OO degne aaetor.
k. Vertical Ditpmton
There are ceren vertical dicpenion
parametar achamaa. but the ioUowing ii
**rn*ng|BnHiffl faaT nfulitocy eipplicaitiQiiii
• Biiggs-utban(Giaord.We). .
Mixing height hat no elfcct until
diapantai coefficient equal* 0.8 time* the
mixing height; unlfam varttcal mbdng la
assumed beyond that pomL
1976) la inclndad ai an option. Parfect
reflection U asfumad at the ground. :
I ^» • *
!• UWBIICQI
expoaentla) decay. HalMlfi faTutput by the
m. Phytical Removal
Physical removal ia not explicitly treated.
Study of Ankara, Turkey, Praceediagx of the
Second Meeting of the Expert Panel on Air
Pollution Modekng. NATO Committee on tb«
OiaUenge* of Modem Society. Paris. France.
Zimmerman. J. R.. 1972. The NATO/CCMS
Air Pollution Study of St Louis, Missouri.
Presented at the Third Meeting of the Expert
Panel on Air Pollution Modeling, NATO
Oommittoe on *h* pa>
CDM may ba mad to modal primary
pollutants^ Sattlina ^mj ^wititiffn an not
t Souree-Jiocepfar Rttattoathip
CDM appiiaa uaarapadfiad location* for
all point sources and ncepton.
Ana aounaa an input aa multiple* of a
n^MMJallMEii unit ana amncM •rtn ii«
User specified release haightt an appUad
foe individual point aourcas and the area
01009 §7idt
Actual ae
receptor pafr ia mad.
j Analysis of the Treatment of Ana
Sources bytha Climatological Dispersion
Modal Journal ofMrPoBution Control
ABOdotfoa. 35:3S9-384.
Londergan, R.. D. Mlnott, D. Wachtar and
R. Pixx. 1983. Evaluation of Urban Air
Quality Simulation Models. EPA Publication
Na EPA^SQ/4-83-020. US. Bnvironmental
Piottctkn AflMCVi RMMICD lUviwt Pinc^
NC
Muaaa. A. U, anrt j. K. * »—••»•«« 1973.
User's Guide far the Clinutfnlogical
Dispersion Model-Appendix B. EPA
PubUcation No. EPA/R4-73-024. Office of
Reaaaich and Development Reseetdi
Triangle Park. NC
XiiiuimiiiiHe J* ILa 1971* Social PnIi.niiu.rT
Resultt of Modeling ftom the Air Pollution nqutaed.
The following optiana ahi
far regulatory applications;
Set the regulatory "default _f___
•UtOBUtiCaUiy MMCt MKK ttp OOWDV
final phnD.1 ri»t, buoy»nc)r-iiMliic»d
tjjgpejygiqn fpipi aj^ my toMtaWBt for
itocted
w^aim^ |Q0 apprapnata wind pfofiia
exponent*, and the appropriate value for
pollutant half-life. , .
b. Input Raquimamtt
Source data: Point aourcas nquin location,
•mi««fam rate, physical stack height, stack gas
exit velocity, stack inside diameter and stack
i temperature. Ana aource* nquin
> rate, and height of
Meteorological data: Hourly surface
weather data bom the pni
RAMMET which pravid
i hi
itabOUy"1
RAMMET wnichprot
class, wind direction, wind speed,
height Actual
gla value) is also
-------
Fedand Kagiiter / VoL 58, No. 137 / Tuesday. July 20. 1993 / Hula* and Regulations . 38851
Itoctptot drtis OoofdlMt>» oftych
niaxima, and a sodded receptor anajrare
inchided. • ^^
e. Output *
Printed output optionally includes'
One- to 24-hour and annual avenge
concentrations at each receptor.
Limited individual MURM contribution II*.
and
Highest thrc^ fifth highest
concentrations at Mch receptor for period,
with the highest and high, second-high
values flagged.
SU stability cliim ere used.
Mixmg height is accounted far with
multiple raflectioni until the vertical phone
stendaM deviation eqaalslJ time* the .
— «- - ---- -• At^A -- * — *
njooA IDM potni*
t atrouNittcHi i
CMOUCU tfuufocnitioDt m tmtM usftu
•oqpaontiai decay. HalMifc to input by the
E&VIEQOBMHiu intQVKIiOB njUOCfi
User* Guktefcr fee Industrial Sowce
Comnlex (ISO) Dlspeiaion Models, Volumes -
1.2. end 3. EPA Publication Not. BPA-450/
4-oa-OOaa c. Bnvironmental Protection
Agency, Research Triangl* Park, NC(NTIS
Not. PB 92-232461. PB 92-332453. and PB
92-232479, respectively}
rhyucu nmofu to sol mplicjuy tmtwL
RAM it a Gaussian plume model
LDU. eada Daladl, 19ML
The model code is available on the Support
Center for Regulatory Air Models Bulletin
Board System and also from the National
Technical Information Service (see page A-
n.
Abstract
sian
RAM may be used to model
ollutan
treated.
an not
RAM applies user-specified location* tat
ell point sources and receptors.
AIM *ourcw an input w multiple* of a
user-defined unit KM wuice grid size.
User specified stack height* are applied far
Individual point source*.
Up to 3 effective release height* may be
specified for the area soimee. Ares source
release mrtgjhtf are aesumed to be appropriate
for a 5 meter per second wind and to. be
invejnely invportumaj to wind speed,
itoady-steteGa
•del which can be used to i
Act
ptor
t
tioobert
is used.
to be at the same
at or above ground level
terrain differences between source and
receptor are accounted for*
g. Phaus Behavior.
RAM use* Brlggs (1969.1971.1975) phune
rise equations for final rise.
tipdc
ctianofthei
(1974) is used.
A user supplied &
height is treated as the physical height The
remainder is assumed to be plume rise fora
S meter per eecond wind speed, and to be
inversely proportional to wind speed.
pi .-_,•— —j.|__ _— J a --- «•_>> --
runu^miOG ADO roiKiing
nottzntod*
Constant, uniform (steady state) wind to
nttunwd nr an houi.
Coocenti«tion» with the RAM
Model at Two Pawn Plants Along Lake Eria.
Ah- Pollution Meteorology, New Orleans, LA.
Bnvtronmentil Research and Technology,
1980. SOi Monitoring and RAM (Urban)
Model Comparison Study In Summit County.
Ohio. Document P-3618-152. Bnvironmental
Raeearch ft Technology. lac.. Concord. MA.
Guldberg. P. R. anffC W. Km. 1978. A
Comparison Validation of the RAM and
PTMTP Modelc far Short-Tenn
Concentrations in Two Urban Areas, fooroo/
of Air Mhttfcin Control Auodation. U: 907-
9ia
Hodanbo*l.RR..andL.K.P«tsn,lMt. .
Evaluation of RAM Modal for Cleveland.
Ohio. Journal ofMrPdhtOou Control
Anodotfon, 31: 253-MB.
Kennedy. K. R. R, a SiegaL md M, P.
Steinberg, 1981. Cue^nedHc Evaluation of
tse RAM Atmospheric Dispersion Model In
«n Urban AIM. 74th Annual Meeting of ON
New Orleans, LA.
Kmmnier. R. R. B. Cho. ^^a RoginskL R.
SmhtandA.Greenbnig,1979.A
ntive Validation of the RAM and
ISA1 Models far Short-Tean 3O»
11& DvtooiL fooxnoi ofAif
Polhttioa Ceatnt AuodaUau,». 720-7X3.
l«ad«rgen,R.J..N.B.BowM,D.R.
Mnrray, K, Bonutam. and J. Mangano, 1980.
AnBvahiitionofShoft-TannAlrQuaBrjr
Models UsingTracer Study Data, Report »K
4333* Amricn Pttrownn ItutltutBt
pollutant concentrations from a wide variety
of sources associated with an industrial
source complex. This model can account for
the following: Settling and dry deposition of
particles; downwash: area, line and volume
sources; plume rise as a function of
down wind distance; separation of point .
sources; and limited terrain adjustment ft
operates in both long1 term and short-term
ISC2U appropriate far the following
applications:
• Rural or urban vear,
all downwind
SPA. 1980) for
LVartico/miuf Speed
Vertical wind speed is
Washington. D.C
Morgenstern, P.. M. J. Geraghty, and A.
MdCnlghtl»79.ACuaiuumUv»Stadyofa>e
RAM(lJrb«n)andRAMRimQModelifer
• Transport distances less than SO
Ulometerr,
• l-hour ta annual averaging times; a&d
• Continuous toxic air emissions.
The faUowIng options should be selected
for ngulatory applications;
Per short term or long term modeling, set
the regulatory "denmlt option"; Le.. use the
keyword BFAULT, which«itomatically
•etecbsteck tip downwash, finalplume rise.
buoyancy induced dispersion (BID), the
vertical potential temperature gradient. •
treatment for calms, the appropriate wind
profile eauuueiits, the aiiiiruuiiate vahte for
pollutant ntlHifc. and a revised building
wake effects algorithm; set the "rural option"
(use the keyword RURAL] or "urban option"
(use the keyword URBAN); and set th»
"concentration option" (us* the keyword
CQNQ.
ission rate.
physical
data- Lnrartn
gas extt velocity,
.and stack i
equal to
J. Horitonta) Dispersion
UnMB atopQniQ& OMfficittDtiV Don Brigy*
(tiUford. 1976) an used.
Buoyancy-induced dispersion (Pasqulll,
1976} is included.
Six stability classes are used.
k. Verltaf Datpenfon
Urban
(Giffard. 1476) an used.
Meeting of the Air
A
72nd Annnal
, Mfc Optional I .
elevation, hntlmng dimensions, particle stoa
OH.
RuO. R.-B,. I960. Evaluation of the RAM
Using tin RAPS Data Beta. Contract 68-02-
27707 SRI International. Menlo Park. CA.
Londergan, R.. D. Mtoott. D. Wackter. and'
R. Fin, 1963. Evaluation of Urban Ab
SmuihrtionModehxBPAPahUcation
U^. Bnvinnnentei
velocities, and surface reflection coeffld
Meteorological data: ISCST2 requires
bonny aurnca weather data uuiu tha
iMpiocaasoT proaramRAMMET, which
vidMhouriy stability class, wind
a, and
nts.
No.
Protection Agency. Research Triangle Park.
NC
j height For ISO.T2. input I
•tebility wind rose lSTARd4cW,ai
afternoon mixing height, average B
mixing height and average air temperature.
OSC2)
elevationforeachr
-------
38852
Federal
/ Vol. 58, No. 137 / Tuesday, July 20, 1993 / Rules and Regulations
c. Output
Priaasd output options include:
IVm
VS. En
Vertical wind speed I* assumed equal to
i Agency.
and receptor data;
* Tables of hoaHy aMteoMlogteaijiata far
each spadfiad day;
« "rr ifaj jieiap iimi enliillnn nr total
deposition calculated at eech receptor tor any
desired source combinations;
• Concentration or deposition values
calculated for any desired source
combinations stall receptor* for any
specified day or time period within the dayt
• Tables of highest and second highest
concsntoation or deposition values calculated
at each receptor far each specified time
period during a(n) "N"-day period for any
desired source combinations, and tables of
the maximum, so CDiwtiilietlon or deposition
values calculated far any desired source
d. Tyjwo/AfcosJ
ISC2 is a Gaussian plume model
t. Pollutant Typet
ISC2 may be used to mode) primary
pollutants and continuous nfeesee of toxic
and hazardous watte i
deposition ant
I Source-Receptor RetottoTifhlpt
ISC2 applies user^pedfied locations far
point. Una.
(Distributed ai part
DocunnnUBon)
•B.NC 27711.
of UNAMAP. Version 6,
RiinldtopanuB
(1069) an mad.
•ton
.dispenia
197») an used.
Buoyancy induced disp
1976) to included.
Six stability classes an used.
k. Vertical Dispenton
Rural dispersion coeffidants
AcientsframBrlgfs
(Paiquifi.
|19M} era wad. with no
sunwa rouahnass.
Urban dispantoe, ooaOdaBts atan BrEggs
{C10anLl976)ar»
1976)
Amifobility
This model to available as part of
UNAMAP (Version 6). The computer code is
available on magnetic tape from: Computer
PfoductSi National Technical Information
Service. U.S. Department ofGuiuniercei
'Springfield. VA 22161. Phone: (703) 487-
4650.
Aottroct
MPTER is a Multiple Point Source
Algorithm. This algorithm is useful far
estimating air Quality dfflfflni!ratiili>T of
relatively non-ieective pollutants. Hourly
estimate* are made using the Gaussian steady
state modeL
multiple reflections until the vertical plume
standard deviation equals 14 ttanes the
mixing height; uniform vertical mixing to
^^^ I that point
i to easumed at the ground.
en mated using
islnputby
i volume emirois. i
awponantUI decay. Tlma
Ibausat.
MPTER is appropriate far the following
applications:
Rural or luban anas;
Flat or rolling terrain (no terrain above
stack height);
Transport distances lass titan SO
kilometers: and
One hour tnrme year areTafjnf, times
The fallowing otions should be selected
'rings. ' -.
Uiar input topoaanbic evaluanoa far aadi
nceptor to usad Bavaoons above stadc top
an reduced to the stack top elevation. U..
"terrain chopping'*.
.< User input Might ebon ground laval may
be ussd when neoasevy to stmulata bspact
at ala»atad or "flag pole** receptors. a.g.. on
Settling and dry depoiittoo of partkulates
aratnated.
Bowers. J. P.. and A. J. Anderson. 1961. An
Evaluation Study far the Industrial
(ISQ D
CoeapU
•parattanbsto
ch
ISC2 uess Brlgas C1960, 1971, 197S) phone
rl» equations far naal rite.
Stack tip rtooaweih eaualloii &MMI Brtag
(1974) is used.
BaeVBaeeMl J>iiMitlpi» eaeekli^ ^•flBawAat ailevekBrff^aWeen 4W
i»ad. Far stacks higher than building height
plus ooa-hatftba lesser of U» building height
or building width, the building waka
algorithm of Hubar and Snyder (1978) Is
used For lowarftacksr the buildug wake
algorithm of Srfmhnan ami Srire (Scnulman
and Hanaa. 1986) la used, but stack tip
down wash and BID an not used.
for rolling terrain (tamin not above stack
. . . MspanMoModekBPA
Publication No. BPA-tSO/4-61-«02. U A
Environmental Protection Agency, Research
Triangle Pack. NC
Bowers. J. P.. A. J. Anderson, and W. R.
Hargravas, 1962. Tests of me mdustrial
Source Complex (ISO DUpennon Model at
veArmcoMiddletowD, Ohio Steel MULEPA
Publication No. EPA-iSO/4-aa-OOn. U&.
Set the regulatory "default option"
aOPTtWHlto au*nnatkelly aelect stack tip
downwash, final plume rise, bnoyancjt
induced dispersion (BID), the new tiaalmeut
far cabas, and the eppropriata wind profito
exponents, and the appropriate value for
pollutant half-Ufa.
Source data: Location, emlsiton me,
phytical stack height, stack gas exit velocity,
stack inside diameter, stack gas tsmpentun,
and optional ground level mS^^T
Meteorological data: hourly surface
RAMMBT which pravtoes hourly stability
I
final nee above eoutce.
Triangle Perk. NC
Sdra, |. 5.. end L. U Sdnilman. 1961.,
Evaluation of the BLP end ISCModels with
Aluminum Reduction Plants. Ate Pollution
Dispersion ModeUufaTcanplax Sources?0
SL Louis. MO.
Schuhnan. L. t, and 8. R. Henna. 1966.
Evaluation of Downwash Modification to the
Industrial Source Complex ModeL founal of
the All Pollution Control Aaaodattea. 36:
250-264.
AJ6
required.
Recepti
vinddimctk
height (a
•dapeed.
height Actual
' value)isabo
iptor data: coordinates and optional
§• tTnmtmnmtt T tut i
n. fSwiaunsef wuam
Constant unifann (ftaadystate) wind to
•tnimtd tir en ti Tmji
Straight line phone transport to assumed to
«* » . • «_ . *
•lli
(BPA.19M) far both rural and i
an used.
Aa optional treatment far cahn winds is
included far short t
Ae/eratice
Pierce, Thomas D. end D. Braes Turner,
I960. Ueert Guide far MPTBR. BPA
PubUcatian No. EPA-600/t-eO-Oie. VS.
ground elevation for each receptor.
c. Output
Printed output Includes:
One to 24-hour and annual average
concentratioiis at each recepton
Highest through fifth h^ast
concantratioBS at each receptor far period,
with the hlgheit and ^'g*1, second-hjgb
values flagged; and
t t JLLJ JemHiXi meu J. -—J JtuitLmu laiKlaa
d.Typeo/Modef
MPTER is a Gaussian phone model
•.PoUutootTypm
MPTER may be used to model primary
pollutants. Settling and deposition ate not
l Proiartion Aeeacy,
Triangle Park. NC (NT1S Ma PB 60-197361)
Cbteo.T. end J. A. Cstslsna 1966.
Addendum to the User's Guide far MPTBR.
t Source-Receptor Jtefationsiup
MPTER applies uaar«pacified locations of
point sources andiecap&m.
-------
Federal Register / VoL 58. No. 137 / Tuesday, July 20. 1993 / Rule* and Regulations 38853
t
User input stark height and source
Manual US. Environmental Protection
elevation for each
receptor is
I Plume Behmfar ,
MFTER uses Briggs (1969,1971. UTS)
plume rise equations for final rise. Stack tip
downwash equation from Briggs (1874) is
Agency. Benaith Triangle Park. NC 27711.
(Distributed M pot of UNAMAP, Version 6,
Documentation)
For rolling terrain (terrain not above stack
height), plume centerline Is horiiontal at
height of final rise above the source.
Fumigation and building downwash are
not treated
LMMfeojitafMOnd*
Constant, uniform (steady-state) wind is
assumed for an hour.
Straight line plume transport is assumed to
all downwind distances.
Thl» model ii available at part of
tJNAMAP (Version 6). The computer code is
available on magnetic tap* from: Computer
Products* National Technical Infonnetion ^
Senrio*, US. Department of Commerce,
Springfield. VA 22161. Phono: (703) 487-
{EPA, IBM) for both rural and i
anuied
i. Vertical Wind Spttd
Vertical speed it ajtumed equal to
Rural dis
(1969) are used with BO adjustments made far
variations in surface roughness or evsngingj
Urt*
(Ciflbrd 1976) an used Buoyancy-Induced
dispersion (Paaqulll, 1976) is included
Qt«* -a-i-ifiia-. —*——— A^K * t
sue nuiuij cmm in HMD*
k. Vertical Ditpmtan
Rural dispersion coefficients torn Turner
(1969) an used win no
CRSTBR U • steady state. Gaussian
dispersion model deafened to calculate
concmtnttooi ton point touicee at a tingle
location la either a rural or urban setting.
Highe*t and hlgh-eecond high concmtntion*
an calculated at each receptor far l-hour. 3-
hour, 24-hour, and annual averaging Urn*.
a. ItocoBunutdatioiufbr negulatoiy U*e
CRSTBR U appropriate for the following
applications:
Single point sources;
Rural or urban anas.
Transport distances lees than 50
kilometers; and
Flat or nUing terrain (no terrain above
stackheight).
The faUowing options should be selected
for regulatory applications:
Set the regulatory "deamh option- which
automaticalqr selects stack tip downwaih,.
final plume rise, buoyancy-lnduosd
dispersion (BID), tin new treatment far
calms, and the appropriate wind profile
and the appropriata vahie for
halMUa.
(Gifibrd. 1976) an used L__i_
Buoyancy-induced dispersion {Pasquill.
Miidng height Is acoouBlBo for with>
multiple reflections until the vertical plume
standard deviation equabl^ times the
ttsunuKl iMQnmil tliftt point*
Perfect reflection Is assumed at the ground
I Chemical Ti ansfenimtioa
Souios dates Bmlssloa rate, physical stack
weather data from the preprocenor
RAMMHT. - -
and "'^"fl h*>fl>'*
height (s single rsl
coponential decay. Half-lUe 1s Input by the
hourly stability class wind
speed temperature, and ml
Actual anemometer height (a single value) te
also required
Receptor data: Require distance of each of
the five receptor rings.
c. Output
t^Sntaatio
Nospedn^sttidJesferMPrBtbecauea
regulatory editions of CRSTBR and MPTKR
are equivalent Studies for CRSTBR an '
relevant to MPTKR as well (Sea page A-32).
A.7
dd
P>iiiiaj|.JiUilHIil la.r|.|rtjj-
• BlH^^B 1MMANM HMMHU^V** •
Ulfll^^BA mftn ^^BWMMl hlflh^Mft tfVMW^^tttVMtttf^^tt
toi wt year at each receptor for evatagtaf
times of 1-. 3-, and 24 hours, pus a uaa>
selected averaging time which may be 2,4.-
6. •. or 12 hours: • -^
A&DUaU •ritUfWOC KWIgJi Mt MCA fKlplOi
For each day. the highest 1-hour and 24-
our concentrations over the receptor field;
gii if iHMHMaiii»i Proteotfoa AgaocKlfl77.
User's Manual for Single Sonne (UU1UK) -
Modal EPA Publication No. BPA-tSO/277-
013. 0 A Environmental FrotactleB Agency.
Research Triangle Park.NC(NTISNaPB
271360)
Cetalano, JA.. 1986. Single Source
(CRSTBR) Model Addendum to the User's
hour concentrations over the receptor
Option for suura contributions to •
concentrations at selected nceptoisv
dTypvo/Modaf
CRSTBR ts a Gaussian phone model
* Mtfhttafi* TW»M
CRSTERmay be used to model primary
pollutants. Settling1 aad oaposittoa aia aot
CRSTBR treats up to 1* point sourcei.no
All point sourcet are assumed collocated.
User input stack height is used for each
User input topographic elevation is used
for each receptor, but mutt be below top of
stack or program will terminate execution.
Receptors an assumed at ground level.
&.PJume Behavior
CRSTERuses Briggs (1969. 1971. 1972)
plume rise equations far final rise.
Stack tip downwash equation from Briggs
(1974) is used.
For rolling terrain (terrain not above tuck
height), plume ceatsriina is horinntal at
height of final rise above the source.
Fumigation and building down wash STB
not treated.
Constant, uniform (steady-state) wind is
assumed for an hour.
Straight line plume transport is assumed to
all downwind distance*.
Separate set of wind speed profile
xponents (EPA. 1980) for both rural and
L Vertical rWnd Speed
Vertical wind speed is assumed equal to
(1969) are used in CRSTER with no
ad|ustnunte made for variations in surtace .
roughness or avenging times.
Urban dispersion couBciMits from Briggs
{GUford. 1976) are used Buoyancy-induced
dispersion (Pasquill. 1976) is included
Six stabiUty classes are used
oonBctmtt from T unut
Urban dispersion coattcients from Briggs
(GUford, 1975) are used Buoyancy-induced
dispersion (PasquiU. 19W) is Included.
Six stability classes are used
Mixing height is accounted for with
multiple reflections until the vertical plume
standard deviation equals 1.6 times the
Panectl
i Is assumed at the ground
attal decay. HalMifo Is Input by the
m* PhyiicQfi
Physical removal is not explicitly treated
n. fiVoJuotion Stttdtas
13ug.vV.,1974.DiS]
Stacks. Fifth MA'
Technical
from Tall
Intemational
AirPoUutton
Londergan. R. J.. N. B. Bowne. & R,
Murray. R Borenstein. and J. Mangano. 1980.
An BvahiaUon of Short-Tenn Air Quality
Models Using Tracer Study Data. Report No.
4333. American Petroleum Institute.
Washington, DC
-------
38854 Federal Rigfcrtflr / VoL 58. No. 137 / Tuesday. July 20, 1993 / Rules and Regulation*
MiIi*,M.T..R; Catena, D.D.Hergert. and
D. A. Lynn. 1981. Evaluation of Mat Sown
DUpenion Modal*. BPA Publication No.
PA-450/4-
BPA-450/4-01-432. VS. I
Protection Agaiicy.Keiaaidi Triangle PaA
Mllli, M. T., and F. A. Record, 1973.
CoinprthenriveAnalyrirofTlme
Concentration Relatioiuhip* ud the
Validation of • Single Source Dtepenton
Modal BPA Publication No. BPA-t50/3-7S-
083. U.S. Environmental Protection Agtney.
Reeearch Triangle Park. NC
MI1U.M. T., and R W. Stan. 1978. Model
Validation and Ttoe-Concentration Analyst*
of Three Power neat*. EPA Publication No.
EPA-450/378-002. UJ5. Enrlropmantal
Piuiaction Agency, Research Triangla Park.
NC
Londergen, R. D. Mlnott. D. Wackier, T.
Kincaid, and B. BonltaU. 1983. Evaluation of
Rural Air Quality Simulation Model*. BPA
Publication No. EPA-*SO/4-B3-033. VS.
Environmental Protection Agency.
SoUfCV QftiaV GriflUJMNI* bCMaTIT ffPtllilOOJ of
PAR.OLK.ETH.XYL.TOL.AUn.PORM.
ISOR, ETOra MBOH. CO. NO. and NO* far
low-level source*. For mafor elevated point
MuroM, hourly emissions, stack height, alack
diameter, exit velocity, and exit temperature.
Meteorological data: Hourly, gridded,
for each vertical level; hourly gridoadrnfflng
heights and surface temperature*; hourly
exposure dasr. hourly vertical potential
temperature gradient above aruTbeiow the
mixing height: hourly surface atmospheric
. pressure; hourly water mixing ratio; and
- * -* -*^..1 m f .m ••••*••••• l^MAftau
Btiuwu nnnoi RNBBDMV NOBiiaV
Air quality data: Concentration of all
carbon bond 4 apadaa at tba beginning of the
•hmdatfcm far each grid call; and hourly
concentration* of each pollutant at each level
along th* inflow boundaries and top
boundary of the modeling region.
n»L_**--- --- * - - - -TZT. _^. *. «_- «.j_^l
utner ojta laquiramaBta ere! nouriy mixea
layeravenge. NO* jpbotolyala rate*; and
y- . t .. |tjontwllh
Afya (1974) is employed. Stability da**.
IL|_ ai • amaiiimUiiuii mmA 11 n»»f— OJLLI.II li !*• tm
•TICOCIEI wajBUmiy* •DC! muOtir^JfiiKKaf(fw M
detarmmed using procedure of Ltn at aL
(1978).
L Chemical Tfuuformatioa
UAM employs a aimpufied vewion of the
Cirbon^ond TV Mechanism (CBM-IV)
developed by Gery at al. (1988) employing
various steady itate approximations.
m. Phytica! Rmoval
Dry deposition of oaona and other
pollutant specie* an calculated. Vegetation
(scaling) factors are applied to the laaaiauta
•urCue uptake resistance of each spades
depending on land me type.
u-EvaJuatioa Studies
Builtiaa, P.}A, KJ>. van dar Hurt, and &D.
Reynold*, 1982. Evaluation of the
1983. Overview. ReeuHa. and Coacluaiona far
the EPRlPtuma Model Validation and
Devetopment Project Plain* Sit*. BPRIBA-
3074. Electric Power Kaiearch laititut*. Palo
A1W.CA.
AJI Url
_j fc^ i^jj
(UAM)
t. Output
Pri&tMX
• Griddad
field* at
idpc
fle^raticat .
Bnvtronmantal ProtacOon AgeDcy, 1990.
Uaaf* Guide forth* Urban Airshed Model
Volume* KvllL BPA Publication No*. BPA-
« Gridded mne-araraga
field* far user-spadOed tit
gridlevek:
4SO/4-«0-007a-«. dfjt). e-g; BPA-«64
. Bnvlfonmantal
004. napactMy. US.
Protection Agraey. Re
ch Triangle Park,
photoclMankalgridmodai
Modal in Practical AppUcationa, 13
International Technical Meeting on Ait
Pollution Modeling and Its Application, lie
ajftf BfpriifH, FtlDO.
Cola. H.S.. DA Layland, GJC. Mot*, and
CP. Newbarry. 1983. Tba St. Loui* Oaona
Modeling Project EPA Publication No. BPA-
450/4->3Mn9. VS. Environmental
Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park,
NC
Dennis. RJL. M.W. Downton. and RS. Kail.
1983. Evaluation of Perfarmanca Maataras
faranlJrbaar^atoehamtolModaLBPA
Publication No.jPA-450/4-83-021. US.
Bd^raonivBtiu ProtaKtkiB AflmcT, RotMtdi
Triangla Park, NC
Hanay. )JU and TN. Bravarman. 1985.
ByiiUtVUOft aMC APPiiCalbOII fli ttaat UlPifl
. _
NC (NTO Noa. PB 91-1312X7. PB 91-131238.
PB 91-131243, PB 93-122380. PB 91-
131268. PB 92-145382. and PB 92-224849.
mpectively. far Volt. Mm).
The model code ic available on the Support
Center for Regulatory Air Model* Bulletin
Board Syttaro and alaortom the National
Technical Information Service (aaa paga A-
U ... ... .
Qiau^CimlrolR«ejton. BPA Publication No.
EPA-450/4-85-003.U^.I
Low4av«I
are specified wlthl;
motffjiidoaiL
UAM I* an urban scale, three dimensional.
grid typenumarica.1 «fanuUirton model, Tba
photochemical kinetic* mechanism far urban
atmosphere*. The UAM ia designed far.
short-term, episodic condition lasting one or
two days resulting from aminian* of oxidea
of nitrogen (NOx). volatile organic
compounds (VOC), and carbon monoxide
(CO). The modal treats urban VOC emissions
placed within oaua aloft IA ecrxvda&os wim
poUutantara^ulatadfarallgridoaUiat
eeca vertical bwaL
g-PiiuneBafcortor 1
Plume riae to calculated far mater point
HtuiiM "***a irlsUiniililiu iBOBaaaafirJTJ trr
Brigj*(1971).
NC
Layland,D£.andilS.Co**,1983.A
Review of RacartAnolkatiOM of the>SA!
1^A«i^ At^^k^^ • •^-a_* VBA ^
uiaan junmaB aaooai. vtrn
KPA-4a OBvar. LJL
Raid, 1982. Application of the SAI Airshed
Modal to tba Tata Metropolitan Area, SAI
No. 82004. Syatama Applications, Inc. San
RaaaLCA.
Scbere. stL. aodLH. Shreffler. 1982, Final
EvahiationaflJrban^calai^olocbamicalAir
/Simulation Model*. EPA PubUcation
.EPA-6XKV3-83094.UA
Seigneur C. T.W. Teach*. CJL Raid. PJ4.
Rom. WJL Oliw,and|jCCa**ma*Bl. 1981.
ThaSensitMtyofComplaxl
Modal Estimate* to Detail La Input
-------
/ Voi 58, Na 137 / Tuesday, July 20, 1993 / Role* and Regulations 38855
t
Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park;
South Coast Air Quality
District. 1989. Air Quality M
Plan-Appendix V-R (Uifaan Airshed Model
Performance Evaluation). SI Monts'/CA.
Stem. R. and B.Seherer, 1982. Simulation
Rhme-Ruhr Ana with a Three Dimensional
Grid Model 19th International Technical
Meeting on Air Pollution Modeling and Its
Application. lie del Embies. France.
Teaehe, T. W.. C Seigneur, L. B. Reid. P.
M. Roth. W. R. Oliver, endj. C Cusmssd.
1981. Tha Sensitivity of Complex
^ photochemical Modal Estimates to Detail in
input tafanMttoiL BPA PuWlcition No*
EPA-4SO/4-81-031a. V& Enriroumeiilal
Protection Agency. Keaaatch Triangle Park,
NC
Tesche. T. W.. W. R. Oliver. H. Hogo. E,
Saxesnaand). L. Haney, 1983. Volume IV—
Assessment of NO, Emission Control
Requirements IntheSouth Coast Air Basin—
Appendix A. PerfaniBnce Evaluation of the
Systems Applications Airshed Model far the
28-27 June 1974 O» Episode to the South
CnestAb Beam. SYSAPP 83/OS7. System
Applications, me. Sen Rahel.CA.
, T.W..W.R. Oliver. H-Hflfo, P.
i and I. U Haney, 1983. Vomna TV—
t of NO, Emission Ctmtrol
Ra^iinmcntstefteSoudi Coast Air Baste—
Systems Applications Airshed Model far the
7-8 November 1978 NOi Episode to the
South Coast Air Basin, SYSAPP 81/038.
Systems Applications, me.. San Rates). CA.
Teecbe.T. W, 1988. Accuracy of Osone Air
Quality Models. Journal of Buvtronmantal
Engmeering. 114(4): 739-752.
-OCD nwy bt tntd to modal prlmiy
pollUlUMV* Svtolfif'UO dflpOtitfOB CM BOt
humidity.
Sonw of tht toy tetum tnchMkpkt&nn
building downwuh. pntUl pluow
pmwtntion Into eknted bmnionf, dinct
ufoof tuibul0nc0 intndtifli svpluniB ^
dispmian, intanction with th* onriud
intmul boundary teyer, md caotimwu*
Up to 250 point KWIGM, S am tourea*, or
1 line Mum and 180 ncepton may be und.
Racvpton tnd tourcw m •Ibnrad at «ny
Each •la
a. RecoaunuidattoiuforBegulatory Use
OCD has been ncommended far use by the
Minerals Management Service far emissJoni
located on tha Outer Continental Shelf (SO PR
12248; 28 March 19»). OCD It applkabtofar
owwaatif mmtt wheWi ottthon ncvpton
are below the lowest source height Whet*
onshore receptors an above the lowest
• grid of up to 3800 nettng
of tha grid to dwlgnatad M «lthar land or
water to identify the coutUna.
g. Phaat fiahovtor
Ac fat MFTBR, tha baric pluma rU«
•Igorithnu an baaad on Briggt'
rlaa Includai considarition of
dicpitnoo
barialacn
Offioa.
bamodatadonacmbycaai
wtththaBPAHagtaaaJ
I ships, or
the source
an uiad to daoaaae phane riM uting •
tdplatfarmd
dialga
ibuad
h. Input Jtoguin
Souna dtta: Point
Mttufawt a
or Una \
nit, building
a, stack height stack gat Is
nslda diametsr. *»*«gM
stock angle from vertical, elevation of;
-an option, emission rate, stack gas exit
vdodty and temperature can be varied
At
Meteorological data (over water): Wted
tftcttcn* wind n
.
apaad, mixing natght, ralatHv
(OCD)
l~M~*mi]\ ^nrtmh
Mataonloglcal data (om land): Vnnd
Htmmnttnmm ^M!«U| mm^^jt ^^^••^^•^^••^M ^Aal^lCl^
onacaon, wmo vpaao, MBpanun, naniiiiy
claM,mbdnghatght
•• . J_A» , .« a. , a _%_. • « *
on labowtory anpanmatttii
Partial pluma panatntion of abvatad
invMtkmt ii tnoudad using tha sugfaitkm
of Brigfi C1975) and Weil and Browar (1984).
Contmoou* «horaUna fumigation la
panmatarixad using tha Tumar mathod
whan conplati vvtfcal mixing dnoogh tha
AaHnalintatnalbottaaaryUyarfnBL)
ocBuia aj aooB as uia puiina intempt> tha
TIBU
h.«ori»iilo/mndf
fVffif If »^ mitfcgm «»fBar wind apaad can baatttmatad
from ovarland wind «pMd using nltUonshlp
d prattaa aw atunatad utlng
11 OOPO
-------
38M0_f*dmI RegJat** / Vol 58; No. 137 / Tueada.y, July m 1993 / Rule* and Regoktfona
4. VtricalDitptnioa ~
Observed vertical turbulence intensity la
not recommended as a direct estimate of
vertical dUpertion. Turbulence intensity
should be ettimated from boundary-layer
theory at default in the model For very
stable conditions, vertical dispersion is also
a function of lapse nta.
Vertical dispersion may be enhanced
became of obstructions near the aource. A
Ritual source technique i* used to simulate
the initial pluma dilution due to downwach.
Formulas ncwnmmulad by Patquill (1976)
an used to calculate buoyant plume
At the water/land Interface, the change to
overland diapanion ntea la modeled using a
virtual source. Tha overland dispersion ntea
can be calculated from either vertical
lurbulMcetataiiaityorthePaaauill-Giffard
coefficients. Tha change it hnpfementad
where the plume intercept* the rising
Internal boundary layer.
1 Chamieof Transformation
exponential decay. Different rate* can ba
specified by month and by day or night
m. Physical Jtanowtf
Physical removal la atao treated using
exponential decay.
Background." FAA Report No. FAA-EB-W-
»; USAP Report No. ESL-TR-»a-55. Federal
Aviation- Adminiatntion. 600 Independence
Avenue, SW.. Wathington, DC 20591. (NTIS
No. ADA 199794)
AnthbiUty
•CDMSi* available for $40 from the addre**
"
Adminiatnton, Attn: Mr. Howard Segal.
AEE-120. 600 Indapandenca Avenue. SW.,
Wathington, DC 20991. Phone: (202) 287-
3494.
Abffraet
EDMS i* a
model for
.pollution at cMlian
alrpofta and niluavy aJr baaaa. ^ua modal,
which wa* Joirnly developed by tha Federal
Aviatioa AdtnmMnDMi (PAA) and the
United Statea Air Force (USAP). producea an
aminion inventory of all airport aource* and
d *y Iheae
far ftjwd aource* auch
aa nial atonga tanka and Inclnacalora and
alaofarntobUeaouroatnchaaautoiaobUaa
or aircraft BOMS Incorporataa aa«
nodal to calculala an arnitaVm Invenlory far
aacn altpott aouica ano a duroaraion modaL
DiCri*tofaro.D.CaiidS.R.Ha
OOkTbeOfiihonandGoaatalDiapenkn
Modal Volume 1: Uaar'a Guide. ~
Reaearch Cotpontion. Wettfbrd, 1
Haana. S. R. and D. C DtCHatoauo. 1986.
Development and Evaluation of tha OCD/API
Modal Final Report. API Pub. 4461,
American Pebobum m*Ututa.'Wa*hington.
DC • - ' • - "
Hanna, & R., L L Schuhnan. R, J. Paine
and;. B. PWm. 1984. Tha Offuon and
Coa*talDi*penion (OO» Modal Uaar'a
Guide, Revved. DCS Study. MMS 84-0069.
Environmental Reaearch ft Technology, Inc..
Concord. MA. (NTIS No. PB 66-159603)
Hanna, S. R.. L. L. Srhuhnap, R.). Paine.
|. S. Pleta and M. Bear. 1965. Development
and Evaluation of the OOabon and Coactal
Dtapenion (0(9) Model fownal of tbe At
Pollution Contnl Aaaodatfon, 35:1039-
1047.
A.10 EMISSKmSANDDISPSRSION
MODELING SYSTEM (EDMS)
Rgfmna . .
Segal. H.M., 1991. "EDMS-
Miaocomputat Pollutkn Modal fbrCMliaa
Airport* and Air Force Baaea: Uaar'a Guide."
FAA Report No. FAA-SE-91-3:USAF
Report No. BSL-T&-91-31. Pedanl Aviation
Adnuntetratio* 600 ttdependence Avenue.
SW..Waahington.DC20Sftl.(NTISNo.ADA
1 •240526)
Segal, R M., and Hamilton, P. L, 1968. "A
Microcomputer Pollution Modal far Civilian
Airport* and Air Force Hue* Modal
Daacriptfoa."f AA Report No. FAA-BE-6*-
4i USAP Report No, BSb-TR-68-93, Federal
Aviation Admlni*tntkm. 600 Independence
Avenue. SW.. Waahmgton. DC 20591. (NTIS
No. ADA 199003)
Sana!. R M.. 1966. "A Mkaocomputar
Pollution Modal farCMliaa Alrporta and Air
*ikA ^- - . »- * ^ _ • i--—,* i
iDat unpiuCaU input L _
(GIMM). (Segal. 1963) to calculate pollutant
apadflad receptors. Tha GIMM. which
procesaea point ana, and Una aource*, alto
incorporatea a special mataorotogical
Dnptooaaaor far pcoceiauai up to one yvar of
National Oimatic Data Cantor (NCDQ hourly
data. Tba modal operate* la bom • acnaning
and nfinad moda, accepting up to 170
•far adulatory U*
BDMS!* appropriate far fee fcnowing
* QimuUttTfj •Ihct of chmg-w Is abcnft
OB ud mobil9 toum
* i'bourtououftl.mhgiQ| Umm.
> Ju^pvt H^ut
All utat m
integral part of BOMS. Typical entry item*
cold eterta. vahidea par hour. etc. Some point
Porttaamitatontfai
EDMSt
utary calculatic
i the
EPA Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission
Factor*. AP-4Z. Par Us dispersion
calculation, BDMSiue* the CIMM model
which it described in report* PAA-BB-M-4
uid FAA-EB-W-5. nferenced above. GIMM
usea a Gauaaian pluma algorithm.
•.Pollutant Type*
EDMS inventories and calculate tha
dispersion of caiboo monoxide, nitrogen
oxidaa. eulphur unridai. hydiocarbona. and
nia^dedpnticlea,
I Sovrct-IbceptarRelaaoiuhip -
Up to 170 tourcet and 10 receptors can be
treated *lmultaneou*ly. AIM aourcea ait
treated aa a eerie* of lima that are positioned
perpendicular to the wind.
Una aotircea (roadway*, run wayi) an
modeled a* a aerie* of point*. Terrain
elevation dimwencee between aomcw and
Receptors are assumed to be at ground
leveL
f. Ptiunf Bthavier
Plume ri*ei* calculated Bar all point
aourcaa (batting plant*, incinerator*, ate.) '
uainf Brigg* pluma rtoa equatkna (Cetalano.
1966; Briggs, 1969: Brigg*. 1971; Briggt,
1972).
Building and stack tip down waaheflecU
annotlnatad.
modification to the Gaussian plume
algorithm* aa aiiggattail by Rap and Keenan
7 (1980) to account far dote-in vehicle-
h.J*»ifeoir.tf IKafit
Steady state wind* an aaaumed far each
hour* Winoa an •laumad to ba fflHtf^if't with
altitude.
Wind* an entered manually by tha user or
automatically by reading previously loaded
NCC annual data file*.
L Vertical MSndSpeerf
Vaitk.alwmdipeadUaaiumadtobaiaia
J. nOt&QIttU DupBOOB
Pour atability daaaaa an used (P-C daaaaa
B through B).
computed using a table lookup and linear
interpolation fh*"t CoafBclants an baaed
on PaaquUl (1976) aa adapted by Petanen
(I960). ^*^
A •. nit*^—* M*mMt»l^ftt .,-fcl- (^ « A^
ft llr1"aTlTQ **nrillT'ITllT leTrtT If irtfll Iff .
I
- , - - ,1 —.—> Jl...^.tljte« T^ .•••^•i
apaao, winn omcaon. nouny
category (P-G) an the nwtoorologkal lapnla.
They can baantend manually through the
BUMS data anHy tenant or automatically
through tha processing of previously loaded
NCDChourtydata.
c. Output
Printed outpuut conaiat ot
• A monthly end yearly amiaaton
mvantory report for each aource entered; and
A cuuotiunjtioo aununtog nport far pp
ntd wflyt, OmilViitMitt n ovwd upon
indudadlnRaoandKaanaa(1960).
L Vartfcaf AltDtnAM
Pour atability claataa an utad (P-G claatat
B through E).
Vertical diapanion coaffldent* an
computed
and linear
to 8760 boun (one year) of data.
on Pasquill (1976) aa adapted by Petanen
(I960). -.-.'•
A inodiflad coafflctoot table ia uaed to
from luw and Kaaatn (I960).
-------
88. No. 137 / Tn«day. July 20, 1983 / Rules and. Ki^nhHonit 38837
I
Deposition is not treated.
n. Bniwaioa Stuofet
Segal, H. M. and P. L. Hamilton,4M8. A
Microcomputer Pollution Model far Civilian
Airports and Air Force Pases Modal
Description, FAA Report No. FAA-E8-68~t;
USAP Report NaESL-TR-B»-fi3. Federal
Aviation Administration. '
» Terrain elevations i
• Rural or urban areas;
* Transport «*•*•"«•• leas than 60
(diameters; and
• One hour to annual averaging times
when used with a post*proosssor i
suchesCHAVG.
b. Input Requimamt*
Source data. For each source*
Avenue, SW., Washington. DC 20991.
Segal. H. M,. 1988. A Microcomputer
Pollution Model far Civilian Airports and Air
Force Bases—Model Application and
Background. FAA Report No. FAA-EB-M-6;
USAF Report No. BSL-TR-M-6S. Federal
Aviation Administration. 800 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington. DC 20591.
A41
Tins ftlgiihbnM
(CTDMPLUS)
NrUnetahle
Ae/eraaoa
Perry, S.C..ttJ. Bums, L.H. Adams. R.
L Paine. M. a Dennis, M. T. Mills. D. &
Strimeitis. R. J.. Yamarttno and B. M. Insley,
1989. User's Guide to the Complex Tamin
Dispersion Modal Plus Algorithms far
Unstable Situations (CTDMPLUS). Votuma It
Modal Oescriptkms and User Instructions.
Environmental Protection Agency, Research
Triangle Park. NCpmSNaPB 89-181424)
Paine, R. L, a C. SMmeitis. M. & Dennla.
R,I.Yamaruno,M.T.MillsandB.M.Iiialeyk
1987. User's Guide ID the Oanfuex Terrain
Dbnanion Model Volume 1. EFA
Publication No. BPA-800/8r«M>58a. US.
Environmental Protection Agency. Ressarc
Wangle Park. NC.(Nm No. FB 88-162189)
Availability
Thkinodel code is available on dw
Support Center far Regulator* Ait Modala
Bulletin Board System and ate from dw
National Technical mfamtetioa Servles (Sea
pantA-1).
exit velocity, steel exh temperature, and •
emission rate; If variabla emissions are
appropriate, the user supplies hourly vetoes
far emission rate, stack extt velocity, and
eteck exit temperature. •
Meteonkgical data: The user must supply
hourly averaged values of wind, temperature
and turbulence data far creation of dw basic
meteorological data file ("PROFILE").
Meteorological preprocessors then create a
SURFACE data file (hourly values of mixed
layer heights, surface friction velocity,
Monm-Obukhbv length and surface
roughness length) and a RAWlNsonde data
file (upper air lueaiuiaiuauts of pienuia,
temperature, wind direction, and wind
speed).
Receptor data: Receptor names (up to 400)
and coordinates, and hill number (each
receptor must have a hill number assigned).
Terrain data: User inputs digitised contour
information to dw terrain preprocessor which
creates the TERRAIN data file (far up to 25
hills).
c. Output
When CTDMPLUS la run. H produces a
concentration file, metuwr binary at taut .
(user's choice), and a liat file
a verification of model inputs, La.,
data from
Stack data far i
(2) A taxt file of concentrations, one vatua
far eec& receptor in the hourly seQuence as
run;or • .
(3) A text file as described above, but with
a listing of receptor information (names.
positions, bill number) at the beginning of
the file.
Hourly information provided to these files
besides dw concentrations themselves
includes the year, month, day. and hour
information as well as the receptor number
d.Typeo/MMfe/
CTDMPLUS is e refined steady-state, point
source plume model far use in all stability
conditions far complex terrain applications.
9. Pollutant Types
CTDMPLUS may be used to model non-
reactive, primary pollutants.
£ Source-Receptor AetotionsAip
Up to 40 point sources, 400 receptors and
28 Mils may be used. Receptors and sources
are allowed at any location. Hill slopes are
assumed not to exceed 15*. so that tne
flow are applicable. Receptors upwind of the
impingement point, or those associated with
any of the bills in the modeling domain.
reouire separate treatment.
g. Phune Behavior*
Asm CTDM, the basic plume rise
algorithms an based on Brigga' (1975)
A central fatten of CTDMPLUS far
neutral/stable conditions Is its use ot *
critic*! dividing-streamline height (HJtd
separate the flown the vicinity of a hill Into
two separate layers. The plume component la
the upper layer has sufficient kinetic energy
' ) of the hill while
Rwiptaf lnfaiiii§tiott
Source-nceptor locati
tope* over the topofthe hill wbil
MNMnilMNi IB this lovw pottlott sn
coMtrainedtollowinaborisontal
around the hilL Two sept
plane
CTDMPLUS is a
Gaussian air quality
map).
to addition, if me ceystudy option is
• Meteorological varlablea at plume balgkt
e Geometrical ralationshtos'
source end the bin
. • Phnne characteristics at«
(Has printer CTOMFLUSconmutegronnd-levef
its of
pUca"tiona.ttcoBlaiiia>iBitaeatbety«tb»
tKbndogyof CTDM tea^t
condlttoas. Howersr, CIDMFUI8
in each of these flows.
The model calculatea on an hourly (or
appoviata steady eiaiaglug period) basis
how tfaa phone trajadoiy (aniin sUhlW
neutral conditions, »a shape) is deformed b
each U1I Hourly profiles of wind and
, plume
^ •fbcttw
ft
has a nuinber of additional capabilities far
* * - "•- n»™ . at
•.USD** of
H^-.^. Jngt^fl Amtm mi
UditEaientnxm other BTAniodals:
considerable detaU far bom types of bmut
daui Is raouirad and v aunpued ojp
CTDMPLUS. CTDMPLUS requitw tha
parameterintipp of indlvidnal hffl shapaa
using the terrain preproosasor and Qw
association of each model receptor with a
particular hill.' " " " "
'
••* iiOiBXiUn Oy ft *JB TwuMi both Alt IBRI
and hot induced (dw difierenoa shows the
tofdwhlll).
WRAP, LIFT and FLAT.
If the user selects die TOPN option, a
aach receptor is gtven-Ulhe 1SOR option Is
CTOMPLUtJa
foUawmg
pout
hour will be printed.
A separawdlskflls of predicted (l^ionr
only) concentrations frCONCT) Is written If
the user chooses this option. Three f
output an possible: >
(l)AUnaryftlea(oancantrationa.c
VUOJ9 mf •tJCD MOatpvOaT aH IBS BOIaVtjF
Into elevated stable
layers, oased on Briggs (1984)). convecthre
sallog parameters, me vahie of He, sad the
Froud* nuBniar above H^
h-MariBHitaflKlndb
CTQaCPLUS OJOM not thTiiilf ^ ^r^^"1
metaorologteal mMttlnni Bothscalarand
vector wind speed observations can be read
by the model tf vector wind speed is
unavailable, it ia calculated ftom die scalar
wutd spaed. The assignment of wind speed
(either vector orscalar) at phune height is
dooeby either: ' '' '
• Interpolating between obsemUons
above and bekwttw plume height, or
• Extrapolating (within the surfnce layer)
phune be%bt
-------
38858 Federal Kegiatar / VoL 58, No. 137 / Tuesday. July 20. 1993 / Rul« and Regulation*
Vertical DOT btresJsd far the plume
compouoBt above the critical dividing
streamline height (HJ; see "Phin»
Behavior'*."
Horizontal dispersion for stable/neutral
conditions is related to the turbulence
velocity, acaio for lateral fluctuations, ov« for
which a minimum value of 0£ m/s is used.
Convecttve scaling formulations an used to
•«Hiim«rocoodings of
the Second International dean Ate Congress,
edited by H. M. Bnghmd and W. T. Berry.
Academic Press. New York, NY.
Briggs. G. A.. 1974. Diffusion Estimation
far Small Emissions. USABC Report ATDL-
108. US. Atontic Energy ComimWon. Oak
Ridge. TN.
Bjorklund. J. B,. add I F. Bowers. 1982,
U^r-s Instructions.fartteSHOKTZ and
LONCZ Cornrmtei Prugnms. BPA
Publication No. EfA-903/9 82 OOtaandb.
US. Bavin
alPTMectlon Agency,
tm.Fhlladalphla.PA.
lngar.}.A.,andS.P.Arya,1974. ,
Height of the Mixed Layer In the Stably
Stratified Planetary Boundary Layer. •
Advances in Geophysics, VoL 18A, F. N.
Frankiel and R. KMunn (Eds.), Academk
PiMHiLsNtaw Yovk* NY*
Bnv^onmantal Protection Agency, I960.?
1980 Meetings). Appendix G to: Summary of
Comments and Responses on the October
1980 Proposed Revisions to the Guideline on
Air Quality Models. Meteorology and
land
«. (standard deviation of the vertical velocity
fluctuation). In «imni«Hnj unstable
(convective) conditions. CTDMPLUS relies
OB • skewed. bt-Gaussian probability density
function (POP) description of me vertical
velocities to estimate the vsrticsl distribution
Development Research Triangle Park. NC
Gifford. P. AM Jr. 1078. Turbulent Difiusian
Typtag Schemes— A Review. Nuclear Safety,
17:68-68.
Huber. A. H. and W. H. Snyder. 1076.
Building Wato mbebon Short Stack
Bfflittiiff . Thlrt ffjnni*cf *i*y* ffp Atmosphnic
Tutbutenoa. Diflurion and Air Quality,
American Mrtwwlogkal SocUty. Bocton.
MA.
Inrin. J. a, M78. A Thaontkal Variation
of the WlndFtaBto Powir-Uw Exponent as
• nincdon of Surface RoughneM and
SCabUlQr. Atnotpniric BnvironDentf 13:
191-104.
Lamb. R. G otaL, 1077. Continued
Raceerch in Meeoecak Air Pollution
Simulation Mddalmf-VoL VL Further
StudlM la the ModeUng of Mlcnacal*
Phenomena, Report Number BF77-143.
Syitana Applleatiani. Inc., San Ratel CA.
Lanen. £ t, 107V A Mathematical Model
for Relattnt Air Quality Meatonmeatt to Air
Quality Standard*. OfBoi of Afr Program*
Publication No. AP-80, UA Bmimnmental
tobKUon Agency, R«muca Triangle Park.
Lilt. M. K. at al. 1078. The OwmUtry.
uivperMon* and TiiEftiport of Aif Pouutants
Emitted from FoKtl Fuel PownPlantt In
California: Dtfa Ana^rsb and Kmbtion
Impact ModtL Systaaa AppUmUons, Inc..
SanRabeLCA.
MeEboy. J. U and F, Footer, Jr.. 1966, St
Louis WipenJon Study Volume DAnarjrtti.
NAPCAPMbUcagonNo. AP-M. UJ5. ___ ^
BtlVlIOBflMBtu PlUlM#U00 AttDCVi RfMUCll
Triangle Park. NC.
Moon, C. B..T. E Suwknlua and a A.
Stewart 10B2. A Sunrmr of SlatUtical
^ f --- ^ --- ««aT fcJfMJafcl 1Bu_A^WHB^Btf^ aMk«l
M0MUVN OK MDOM mmilDOV UQ
Aocunqriw Senral Air Quality Model EFA
Publication Na jgPA-450/4-O-OQl. UA
Buvlrunmental PiutoLtlon Agmcy, Re>eard>
Triangle Park. NC
PaaniULF.. 1078. AtmotpherlcDitpenka
Parameter* In GenatiaH Piano Modeling Fait
ILRiatibleRwmiimnantiforaumgeintfle
Turaar Workbook Vahiea. EPA Publication
_
BBJ Imifmotel PiutoCDon AgancjF. RaMarcn
Triangle Park. NC
Tuner, a B., 1069. Workbook of
AtlHfttTmTffif! Pffirtl'l iffll BtttmlM* PKS
FublkntloB No. 999-88. U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Reeearch Triangle Park,
Whlttaa. G. Z.. ). F. Klllus, a^ H. Hogo.
4 A*A %Ag*A^lmm jaf AliiMtlttteBi Pfif^nphnVtiia^bJ
Smog witt Kinetic Meduntame. Volume i.
FlnaTReport EFA Publication No, BPA-800/
3-00-O28I. VS. Bnvtionmental Protactioa
Agency. Research Triangle Park. NC
Briggs. G. A., 1975. Flume RiM Prediction*.
Lecturei on Air Pollution and Environmental
Impact Analytea. American Meteorological
Society. Boston. MA, pp. 80-111.
Biuinger. J. A., 1973. Turbulenc* Transfer
in the Atmospheric Surface layer. Workshop
in MicTometoofology* American
Meteorological Society. Boston, MA. pp. 67-
100.
Daardorff, J. W. andG. B. Willis, 1982.
Ground Level Concentrations Due to
Fumigation into an Entraining Mixing Layer.
Atmospheric Environment. 16: 1150-1170.
Hsu. S. A.. 1981. Models far Estimating
OBshore Winds from Onshore Meteorological
Measurements. Boundary Layer Meteorology.
20:341-352. '
Schulman. L. L.. S. R. Hanna, and D. W.
Heinold. 1085. Evaluation of Proposed
Oownwash ModiBcsikms to tbe Industrial
Source Complex ModtL BUT Document P-
BB10-012. Prepared far American Petroleum
uutltuts*
WeiL L C. and R. P. Brower. 1084. An
Undated Gaussian Phone Model for Tall
Stocks, foumal of the Air Pollution Control
Association. 34: 818-827.
Catalano, J. A.. 1086. Addendum to the
User's Manual far the Single Source
Publicati
(CRSTER) Model EPA
ation No. EPA-
800/8-88-041. US. Environmental
Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park.
NC (NTIS No. FB 87-145843)
~ /.M.W.,G.Z.WhlttenandJ.P.iailus.
1088. Development and Tasting of CBM-IV
far Urban and Regional Modeling, BPA
Triangle Park. NC (NTIS No. PB 88-180039)
Petonen. W. B., 1980. User's Guide for
JflWAY-2 A Highway Air Pollution Model
EPA Publication No.JPA-800/8-80-018.
U A Environmental Protection Agency.
Research Triangle Park.NC (NTIS FB 80-
227888)
Rao.T. R. and it T. rsenan. 1980.
Suggestions tor muravement of the BPA—
HIWAY Model Journal of the Ah- Pollution
Control Association. 30:247-258 (and
lasaiipendixCmPstersen.1980).
. a M, 1083. Microcomputer
f
louaalofUMAirl
23:598-40a
Apn«M>Bto
ttt
1 IV ef Fart Si-
Air Quality
Tobtoo/
B.O Introduction and A
B.1 Air Q
Air Resources Regioiiall
Assessment (ARRPA)Modsl
B.3 APRAC-3
B.4 COMPTBR
B.8 ERT Air Quality Model (BRTAQ)—
B.6 BRT Visibility Model
B.7 Hiway-3
B.8 Intagnted Model far Plumes and
Atmospheric Chemietry to Complex
Terrain (Tinpart) "••••• -
B.9 LCNGZ -
-------
F«d«n.Vaegeet» I VoL Sty NK 137 / Tu^day, July 20, 1093 / Rajo* and RaguUttona 3Mi«
t
B40 Ma jlaail flneer riant ftltlm
(FPSP) Model
B.11 Hfajun.il! TiitfUuiM (MeeupufflO
B.12Mtaeaeale Transport DUbskBo4
•MjPQnilO& MMENEMM wT IBf V Mil SomOH
B.I3 Models 3141 «d 4141
B.14 MULTJMAX
B.1S Mtatipieftrfnt Source DUtuitan Model
(MPSDMMMetod
B.18 Mum-SourcelSCSTER) Model
B.17 PadftaCe«andB]ecWcPhiineeModel
B.18 PLMSTAR Air Quality Simulation
Model
B.19 Phone VWbllity Model (PLOWED)
BJO Potot. Ana. Line Source Algorithm
(PAL-DS)
BJ1 Random Walk Advectton and
Ditpenion Model (RADM)
6X22 Reactive Phone Model (RPM-0)
&23 Regional Transport Model CRTM-Q)
P24 SHORTZ '
BJS Simple 1 Jn*Soarce Model (CMUNE)
&26 Te»Oiinatological Modal CIQ4-a)
«X27 TexacBptoodic Model (TBM-«)
cUS AVACTAD
B.2B ShonlineDiapenian Model (SDM)
BJO WYNDvalley Model
&31 Danae CM Dlipmloa Model
(DBGADIS)
thte mMadtz thM nbn to d» U«^i
teApplM Modtttag of Air
PoUuttoiifUNAMAPlihouMbtlgnowd
rtBCT tin UNAMAP it no tonyr opwrttoMl
HoWtW* • 4J>UfC^ BDf NIM OK tMNNI filiMMMI
PiQQuctii Nititnnl Tidtaitoii toiDfimimi
Senrtoi (NTIS). U J. Dvpntmnt of
, Springfitld. VA 221U. noon
(ST
aixlat Mght, and tvmft «b tampnatun.
tad locution of notpton. If th« Lu*n
traasfam opttOB ii to b« u*»d to ettinwU
•hort mn^ng UBH oonentntio
A. aumbir of tb« nodd oodM md Mtoctod,
i fuidw ait «]M amllabl* tarn
Air Modtte
•* (SOtAM BBS),
I geometric deviation of
conceatntfou is required. -
c. Output
Printed output includes:
One month to one year avenge
' i (arithmetic mean only) at
TetophoM (919) S41-4742. Tte SCRAM BBS
• _^ ^m^^j^^^f— |»»|'^^1«B lM^BB«4 ^—^A^^B.-
dwtgMdto bt UMT fttoad^r «d acoirtW*.
front ujiwbwi IB th* couatiy. Mood
Optional ttblbvy ranging tfcM by Linen
(1971) pioowhiM ttypkally 1-24 hr); and
Optional individual pouM. waa »ourea
culpabiUty list fat aach racaptor.
AqpMiaaGatttdanpiumamodaL
SCRAM BBS to dotmlotd onn&t
MOoM oodnmu timt ntofc
B4
AQPM may bauaad to model non-nactiTa
poUutntt. Settling and deporttlon an not
I So
TRW Syttenu Gmip. 19S9. Air Quality
r ModeL Pnpend te National Air
ittoa Control ?£*•**-***. DHEW.
VJS. PubUc Health Senrtoa, Waahtagton, DC
(NTISNO.PB1B9194)
AQPM appliaa uaar^padfiad locations and
AQPM applies ueer-cpec
atack height for each point
on t cu»bjr**ta*
emnod. if a ttatitrtcal
evaluation baa
maaturedairtiualitydataaadaw
farlltgalataiyUM
baufedlfttcanbe
model for t given application. AQ0M
M aMCttied IB toe einiiviuaBt nvodeV
AQPMcanbeaaeaooaraeahyrai
Fumigation and dovmwath are not tnated.
^ffft ^yn^iy^ii*tto«y igaafumad whaa
phone height i* greater than mixing height
Wind data an input w stability wind roet
encydieMbuaon)ofl«wtad
ttac wind (peed daaaaa, and five
ImodelforthespedfioapnlkattoB
I a svflBed andeltoMeded toeiasfy
Hgolatofy ivojiiiiaBDaBfeiL Aisy/ OBO 01 ttaee-
Iheee modeli It* eacdoai 31. Uee of
AftarnatiMKIodelvteeddiiiQMldaaiUe,
Many of thaea modeli he»e been euJi|ectto
with obeerved ah* quality dat>> A funuiMry of
AQpM ,
tanevrfapnfenedmofelifttanbe
damonMiaoKL ualng tbe isiieihi tat eectioB
' ' '
r quality <
this appendix ia included m "ASmwy of
tf*-»t, if - ,t • * —** M •_< »^^^^^^^^^_^^
fortheappllcaflonihouMbe
liability elaeaee.
No variation la wind apeed with height ia
CoBttaat uniform (»teao>«tate) wind it
L Vertfanf Mad Speed
• Verttcal wind ipeed if aMumed equal to
ly diitributed
|.HoriMataIIM«per«foR
Pottutntfaanaatumedt
• aajdeene
of ooctnmctt of «t
la interpol
and Accuracy for Seven! An- Quallry
Modebr.BPA-450/4-«3-001.When
aadheigbtaof
have been fub{ectad to dgonma
evaluation •cndiM. including (1) etatiatiGal
tempentun. alack gM esrtt veloc^r, and
IftfM? nll^1**** nff I™1181* "•*
for point
i fcom l month to 1 year or
k. VettkB/ObpenJoii
-------
/ Voi 8«. No. 137 / TU~d*y. Jidy 20. MM / Ruiat «ad
art F mm
J «ablHty tnp» iHiiimlly late
80* day, 40% Bight, with tin two dUhrtag
oaty to toe tnatent of nteiaf height
MUint>etght(«aluiietiOBofa«mgle
tap** afternoon mixing bright, • stogie input
morning mixing height. modified by 6m
rate*
r constant or variable i
i, n > m in mi.. /». .•.y-i».».^ «._ may beuced.
jEZSEtiMSEttu^;1 jasffiaa^ass^
lOkBtob^aadsakmthmiBMfpaciflc "•wptowabm* ground i* variable.
"* " Batthepnaadttiiae.Th* ~ ™ **'* '—
NotbMMd.
LPfiyiicaf Jtanotui
Nottnaled.
b. ftipat Jtoqaft
conttnuoas mmwr througb dtoatti model
McNidar. R.H. 1977. Variability Analyri*
of Long-term Dtopenioa Models. Joint
Conference on Application* of Air PotJutton
29NOTemSr-20ec«mbe»*1977rStLBke
Qty.LT.
lteaar.DA.Mt;
Buna. 1*73. Aa I
CUmatowgtcal Dfepenion Model*. IB .
•cE.U*Bf* Guide to the
i Model, EPA
ajwpjnaMnbeLaceiiaB layar*(Muallar.et»L,i9a3).
^JO..A.[ «»~j, Mghl fir* Plume canbetoolatadftoai the ground
[iffiftfi^^ffiary *" Plume height fade* la Uaie and cpaca.
- \LHoraotttalWMt
I MI (a^rtejfUilUaBW^aaiy grid.an spatially interpolaMdatriMrnotU)
i laai aail mlila* hefciM Then ilal* BIB Timmjul iLimBiL rtm iLlnm i .in ii. i L .•!
^•^^w^^^B ^••^t^^^^^^^^v «^^p^^ .^^^^»^ ••iM^^m uuiM^pi mv vf^^flv wVpm iv Hv*
OBiBiBaaMoaBpai-anniVBiefMMn vmpw pluma teMapott yactdrs. A taodel optioc i*
pnpncaMlng ptagmn called MDPP (Mueller •"•n*Mftfc~ttaet1fao triad m«,u«» noartfae
and VaJanla.lM3).Itequii«d input to MDPP varUcal plume oenter'lnstBad of oomtnitinti
UBtMont™t(totin^hourto*nrrf,)ofu. v«tteaHV<.Ma»d facto. OTBpuu"»
•••••1 V^MWM^*^ •••««•/* ••H^VVV ••• «Hjr*a* var BTHBVV •
I* BLM ontpottm time hour mtanrmb) of*.
v. w, and O. Buzmoa layer friction «^odty
(u.) and Mifcce layer vakiat of the
•nd R.R.
K.j..D.H.MiBOtt.D.|.t
Criddad
•array ffnoriliiafTf (TT ami y) aad
1 hej*jhtt (a) DDB a rwaptor
program called HECHT.
at • '
Th» mw»-conf»iving BLM wtad fMd «sad
in thi* model provide*
Gompoaeati that my horUoaUlly aad
wnicalhr, aad an tued to ad)u*t plume
} t "rt*^MT"*ffr flffIJHIftifllfl
Nn.
Protocaop Agency.
NC*
(lwgenn)th.oiy
telOOOBSor<
Mwltor, SJ.. R.). Vtbm^TA. Ct*wfad,
«MiL.UCwilaey,
oftheAirRecouimt
ONR/AQ&-83/14. T«an»nee Vatbv
Authority. UaMle5hokk.AL. -.
Ihe-compular cod* and wmpb input for
thi* model on magnetictepeamdaeapyaf
DISPLAY and ANALYSIS; DISPLAY
I
(20S)386-2M8.
Wiw thv flHtpif1
«rt»» rin^t — f
AIM COB Ol
d«io*RloB field* far ucer-medfledtlttM .round
period*; ANALYSIS print* out (l)thaBve Veett
nlrfml tiftfif imtrittffH* of SOii ^"d/df SOj^ it
tobaab»at»loa
Hit U«M'I Guide i* frM of durM.
t^eARRPA model tea
egmaatad-f
ooiDpttnaif
Auntquewttunofthe
**+ *t*nwmvm\mvt wm w* «^««x «•*•••* «em WWBJ
^^rmi^tel-boilr.34iour(opiioaan
aiid24-b«ir{op&BaQaTCnigln|pBilod*.(2)
avenfiSOiaad/arSOtcaiicantzadoBfat
each feoaptcr far the entbe aaeiyaU period
aadpJariddedSOiand/arSa-•
bG*u*ilaB.wkh
until a.
Tfc* AUPAaiadal b a GMMte
•ajajejv^BBNBBBm *Mej«aja*aM*Bak i>apBiBt*aBMt ••••> WW*MW«
nhlrh If jariBimrifait tn inrjr tiniitlj
SO,andS(Vtmb»at*d.
-i dtptetlen equation. Dry
viloclDai varjr acBDrab^ ^ ^^
-------
/ Vol 5S. Ne.-137 / Twday. July 20. Ittaa J Rule* and Regulations 38861
t
MuUer.&F. and LW.RaMagar. 1966.
Evahiatloa of the Air Resources Regional
Pollution Assessment (ARRPA) Model;
BJ APRAC-3
•.PoUutotitiypw
APRAC-3 may b> «ii*d to modtl primvy
pollutanti.
t SouiwJtoHp
Simmon, P. B.. R, M. Patterson: F. L.
Ludwig, and L. a Jones, 1961. The AERAC-
3/MobUe 1 Emissions tnd DUftwtao
Modeling Package. EPA Publication No.
EPA-909/9-B1-002. U.& Environmental
Protection Agency. Region DC, San Francisco.
CA. (NITS No. PB 82-103763)
AvaiiabHity
Thit model i* available at put of
UNAMAP (Version 6). Tht computer cod* to
available on magnetic tape tan: Computer
TnfDc links may bm uUtruy teaith ind
oriralatian. Off-link tnfflc U •UocttWl to .
two-ffilla wpun grid*. Link Inffic •migpioiu
«• •nngilwd Inla m raoiptar oriaatad
source uny. '
TlM bouadviM of tlw
trmted in> (1) ire* rt «di«l dtiumeM fr
thv notptov which inoMM ID gtoowtric
pragiMfion. (2) OM tide* of • 22J'
l upwind for dbtucM grail
45'
rthan
1tional Technical tafa
etia
Prodii
Service. US. Department of C
Springfield. VA 22161. Phone: (703) 487-
4650.
1000m. ud (3) dM rid* of •
oriented upwind for distucw Uw tlun
1000m.
A rimllir mnouiat uny l» ombliibid
forMchMoaptor.
SOUVOM w uiunittd to M at pound wvw.
Up to 10 notpton v* •ctapttd for uy
APRAC-3 Is a model which computes
hourly average carbon monoxide
concentrations far any urban location. The
model calculates contributions from
lonvario
mainly from sources upwind of the city of
interest: intraurban, from freeway, arterial.
Up to 625 nofpton «n •OMptod for •
itagU-hour.
Up to a MMDtOM «ft accepted far tht
IntttMctton. niDBUXNL
R«c«ptan in at ground kv»L
RMaptor lontiont m «Utt«y.
Four inlmully iWJHM noBptor toouoo>
and feeder street sources; i
dispersion within a ttraat canyon. APRAC-
3 requires an extensive traffic inventory far
the city of interest APRAC-3. a* Hextott on
UNAMAP (Version 6). hat been updated wtth
Mobile 2 emission factors. . •
a-flecoaunendotfoi
ooBtrlbutkn tan upwind
32kB biMd on wind
b«yond
mbdng bcgit.
fcwnotk
Manyi
I Is included la background.
APRAC-3 can be used If it can ba
demonstrated to estimate concentrations
equivalent to those provided by the preferred
model far a given application. APRAC-3
APRAC-3 cinbtuied on ton by ran
buit in UMI of • pntand modal tf It cm to
dcaldatamqulramant«an: '
Houriy wind dinctian (naanat 10 d«gnat).
houriy wind *paad. and hourly doud com
for viability calculation*. •
Racapuvdataiwnil
nthlneachhc
The model can interpolate winds at
LVaKeafWIndSpavtf
Vartkal wind spaad is aaavmad aoual to
MTO axcapt in ttraat canyon wbHBoaaL
HaUed dicuUtlon atnunad by atraat canyoD
sub^nodaL
ata
tiaglai
ilaa far up to 10 noapton mr any
c Output
Priatad ouput indudaa:
Houriy cakulalkma at aaefa racajtor.
Sector
distribution wfthin sectors. Sector siat It 22.5
degrees beyond 1km and 4S.O degnee within
1km.
k. Vertfcaf Otpenfaa
Six stability clatees muted. Stability dan
to determined internally from user-euppUed
raeteorologicaJ date modified fan Turaar
(1964). - ,
Difpmloii oonflcianiaei iN
far variation! la aurfaca raufbnaai.
McElroy and Poolar (1966). No i
aramadaf
Downwind dtttaaei ntHOea. at o. it
ataumad to ba ai^ far purpoaat of doing,
analytical intapatton.
In ttraat caayoo tubHBwdalt aji arapirical
nmction of wind apaad and atnat width and
dinctian It mad.
Perfect reflection at tha lurfeca it astumad.
Mixing (Might it ignond until
coocantratioa aqualt that calculated using
box modal. A box modal (unifonn vertical
distribution) it uaad bayond that dittaaca.
L Chemical Transformation
Not treated.
m. PhjrticaJ Jtanowal
Nottraatad.
a. Braluation Studit*
Ludwig. F. L and W. F. Oabbardt. 1972.
Evaluation of the APRAC-1A Urban
Dispersion Modal far Carbon Dioxide. SRI
Project 9563. Stanford Research Institute.
MenloPark.CA.
BU COMFTKf.
State of Alabama. 1880. COMPTER Modal
Users Guide. Alabama Department of
Environmental Management. Air Division,
Montgomery. AL.
AnitatuUty
Tbit modal ii avaikble to users far tape
and reproduction charges. If a tape it sent
the reproduction it free. Sand tape aad
desired farm* and tpedficationt to: Mr.
RiehartRGfunifck, Chief. Air Division.
Alabama Department of Environmental
Management. 1751 Federal Drive.
Montgomery. AL 36109.
Aottiwst . •
COMPTER is based on the Gaussian
steady-state technique applicable to both
urban and rural anas. Tba model contains
tha fallowing atnibuter (a) Determines
mairimirm 24-hour. 3-bour. 1-hour aad
variable bow concentrations for bom Mock
and running averages; (b) elevated terrain
considered with the standard plume
chopping technique or stability dependent
plume path trajectory; (c) uses annual hourly
meteorological data in the CRSTER
preproceiior farmat; (d) uses PasquiU-Glfford
stability curves: (e) allows far stability class
tubstitution in the ttabla categorias. Typical
model naa It in mral ana* with moderate to
low tafiala faatufaa*
r for ff
COMPTER can be used ifi^can be
I to attlBMte concentratioat
equivalent to tboee provided by the pretered
modal far • given application. COMPT8R
mutt ba executed IB the equivalent mode.
COMPTER can be used on a case-by-cate
batU BtUauofa prafarred modal If It can be
3.2. that COMPTER is more appropriate far
the specific application. In this case the
amdal optlous/modea wbtcfa are most
appropriate far the application shooldba
b.In
Source data raquiiamants ara: Annual or
Mttriy TahiolgianiiMlon rate, exit velocity.
-------
/ Voi 58. No. 137 y ToBocar. fuiy 20. 19B3 / AulM and
stack •*
stack bahjhi and stack
Meteorological dst
HoorfywSSe "
from the EPA
Pnoracaator output iacludaa hourly ftahiiity
dam wmddbactioa. wind apaad.
variation in Hiiface iDUfjhnam ar
time. . •
Optionally. rtabillty-daw 7 may bo batted
a* Out 6. '
include changiiig stabilities F and G to E. and
reducing B, F, and G to O. & ud F,
Kocaptor data nquliMMati am: <
cootdiHtM with Mipact to aouraa, ktituda.
lonajtuda. Hma mna. data. Uma of day.
elevation, relatlva humidity, backpouad
visual nnaat tiiia^if'Stflht ••%t^% »iyi
alavatlon jjfgly, in^Mmtlft1' ancla of tha
obaaivad obfact. distanca oom oMacw to
k Vcrttaf Akpm
receptor coordinatta; at a location and
dlstanca from the center of flvt ring* of
lacoptofi* of a combination of individual
the rings of receptors. Elevation* of «
receptors may be input
c. Output
Printad oislptit hscluds
time* of L 3j»d24-houw.a \
avenging tima which may be 2-12 hours
(variaWttouriyl.aodaSOhightsMefarl.
3. variable hourly, and 24-hours:
Annad arithmetic average at each receptor:
objact. objact and suifaca nsactiTityv snimbar
and (pacing of iotogral receptor point! along
linaolfa "*
conceatntton* of 0* and NO.. dapoaWon
velodty of TSP.auMala. nttiale, SO, and NOb.
Other*
jstabUttasFaadGtoRand
ndudng B. FTnd C to D. B. and F.
laspectivar/.
c. Output
Prifl
datailad maalla aafclkwK
Pap I alat. otiaaiiai anil ohjacl
-pnmu
, redaction, aad each polhttant's
tribudon: page 6-calculatad phima
• • " • contrast
dagndationatthaSSffi
aac& day Gonauarad.
Computer readable output iadodee:
ndana&.R..aMlaott.aWacbac.T.
.. _ _ .__ J24-
houriy concentrations for each nceptor on
pj«V^W«) values far both sky and objact
tagmaH00.4M,SM.
COMPTOt toa
OOMPTER may ha naad to modal priaaaqr
attling and daporitioa an aot
POMPIER appHaMiiartpacUlad
Uaar
llatfMf^
Uaar
andaource
aiaaiaumadtobaatfrauad
(nM, X971.
wtthUmUad
stability with uaa of pnma pith
• a» IfetliOJIMI wtnttt '
Ponftim nnifhrm (ita-Mlj ilUrt irtntf li
U
Trtangla Paris. NC.
BRTVteibUity modal toaGauadan phnaa
Tha uaar'stiiMa aari saodalcoda asa
lailablateaauaNadonalTaohBiosi
i-
Tba BtT VUUOtf Modal k a
L VfftfcoMMadSpaad
Vadicalwmdapaadis
I
W1B0
0.10. ai». 020. ft»,a3a andOJClfar
A IhnnigliF, laijiai ilialj
M^to THata H no speriflr mnomaisiiilsMnai
"™alD praeantama TfoBCTVMbfllty Modal
Rusal
of NO. aa NOa. hactia of TSP
-------
I VoL 58, No. 137 / Ttoatday. July 20, 1993 / Rule* and Ragnlattona 38863
t
"Jty depOSlUUU is tlWteo by* tnS SOOIOB
depletion method. ,
n.fivduotfen Studies
Smjf/BGOf, O» R. W. DugftfttfUt UN A. H.
Hndischewtkyi. 1982.Evaluation of the EPA
PLUVUE Model and the BUT Visibility
Modit Based on the 197» VIS1TA Data Sett.
BPA Publication Na EPA-4SO/4-i2-008.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Research Triangle Pert NC.
White. W. R. C Seigneur. D. W. Hetoold.
M. W. Bltgroth, L. W. ftchsrds. P. T. Roberts,
P. a Bhardwaja. W. D. Conner ud W. B.
WUion. Jr., 1985. Predicting the Visibility of
Chininey Plumes: An Iiitercainpexisoo of
Pour Models with Observations at* Well-
ControUed Power Ptau. Atmospheric
Environment. 19:515-628.
B.7 HJWAY-2
•fMNMla Wind dtoVCtlO&t MM vgljifM JQfimt ma
tfc Peeyria-Gigord suhinty dees. Wind
speed and diMction ass prsfsRed to be at 2
'Receptor data laqulrements ares
Coordinates of each receptor.
Printed output includes:
specified receptor JocattoB,
d.rypeo/MMel
HIWAY-2 is a Gaussian plume model
e. Pollutant Typet
HIWAY-2 may be used to model primary
Jtefattttftfll y
HIWAY-2 appUee
pointt fa tetagb roadway
ueer-epeciSedncep
Petsnen. WJB., 1MO. User's Gold* far
HIWAY-2. EPA Publication No. BPA-600/8-
80-018. U.S. Environnwntal Protection
Agency. ESRL, Research Triangle Park, NC
(NTJS No. PB 60-227556)
This mode! is available a* part of
UNAMAP (Version 6). Tha computer code Is
available on magnetic tape f
~ ' " 1 Technical Infa
Springfield, VA 22161. PhOBK (703) 467-
4650.
Abstract
HrWAY-2csnbeusedtoestimatethe
gfy poihittop uuiiLBuUtf tofti it i^JOifrtOsf
locations downwind of "at^mde" aad "cot
applicable for any wind direction, highway
orientation, and receptor jftMtion. TJW model
was developed far situations where
horizontal wind flow dominates. The model
cannot consider complex temin or large
obstructions to the flow men as buildings or
large trees.
Plume impact on receptor is calculated by
finite difference integration of a point souice
along each lane of the roadway.
g, HiimrMovfor
HIWAY-2 does not treat plume rise.
h. Hoiitoatal Windt
Constant, uniform (ste«ry-etete) wmd ia
assumed BY an oour.
3tnlght line plume transput la assumed to
aUdownwutd distances.
An aerodynamic drag factor is
when winds are parallel to the
speeds are less than 2 ra/ssc.
i Verffoat IMbnf SDSSO*
Vertical wind speed is assumed equal to
aero.
Utoliniiminisfisiifciii
Beyond 300m downwind total tmtohnce
is ooneidend to bt doiiilmiad by
atmoapneiic tubuknce, with pluaw
dineatan M deeoibed by Tumer (UW).
pbitic QiOTnlttry In
Complex TamiD. DCN 80-241-403-01.
Radian Gxpontton, 8501 Mo-Pac Bhd.,
Austin, TX.
A magnetic tape containing the IMPACT
model, a tet of teat data and a copy of the
IMPACT Uier'e Guide are available for a coat
of $500 to* Howard Batenttne. Senior
Meteorologist. Radian Corporation, Post
Office Box 9948. Austin. TX 78786.
Abrtract
- IMPACT ia an Eulerlan, three-dlmenttnnat,
finite dUBMOce grid model designed to
"aimlm tht impirt fff p"fr'^nt*i alther
inert or reactive. i& sispw or complex
tenain, emitted from either point or i
fource*. It automatically treats single or
Braittple pomt or ana sources, the effects of
•^iii-ft temperature f*»mim»tim* on the
wia)d ae)d dlftisioB fields, shear flows caused
by UM atmospheric boundary layer or by
tenant •Beds, ami r%fm»«f' transformations.
a. JbconmtrnfotfoRff far Regulator
IMPACT can be used if it on be
lto
model teagrven application. IMPACT must
beexKutedintheequrraleatmode.
IMPACT can be used on a case-by-csee
imBeuofeprefcrndmodelifiteanbe
I I|MI ollwki in Mctioo
3J. the* IMPACT is moraeppraptiMe for the
spedfieappUcation. la this
optioas/niodes which an m
for the application should be \
There Is no spedfk i
concerning the use of IMPACT for
pbuh»:hemtoal appUcations. IMPACT may be
used on a case by-csse basis.
D. Ityuf flsmigmiuflli
Source data requ
ve the model
Mteppropi
i used.
are; Fox point
aourcee location (I, J), stack height, exit
dianelsi1 and aocit veJocily. hourly emission
ntasfDraDpoUuUuilsj foraraa KTurosi
location of comers, and hourly emission rates
for each pollutant
Meteorological data Mouirements ate;
Hourly wino speed and direction, sur&ca
and etafatod. 4ammeteorologi«l stations
within and surrounding the modeling area.
tempesatun, pressurst humidity and
Insolation (the three last variables are
optional).
B - ^_ J^ ---- ,
i are output far bslis in the
Igrld.
Air quality data (optional): One or more
ition profiles for each
ir qual
tkJ^o
Comparative Assessment of the
CtkM deia;2-Oanv of terrain heights, 2-
D army of surface toughness values
(optional).
-------
f. Output
Printed c
options inch)
(isstaaisneous, or averages over N ham
whereN-1,2,3,. . .J;
Harixoalel cross sections of diiuslvltiee
•end wind velodUet; and
Arbitrary vertical and horlsontal crow
sections of pollutant coBcentratioiis nd
difnisMties. and CALOOMP wind field
vector plots are generated by tht POST port-
chid*
n.BnhiatoaStutliti
Febrkk. A. J.. R. Skhvew.aad}. Wilson.
1977. Point Source Model Bvehutioo end
Development Study. Reput praye-eil lac tht
G-OifciBia Air Resources Bond
Fabiick. A. J.,iad P. J. Haas.i960.
AiulTii*4rf Dispersion Models used far
Complex Train Simulation. Presented tt
for the application thould to
*f* mott ftppcofitittto
uld to and.
Sown data requirements TO For point.
buUdiag at ;srea source*. location, elevation.
Couput
idabla
Coacentntioa. wind told tad diflusMrjr
iutai for ftftcti hour.
d.TypeofHod«l
IMPACT It an Eulwiu Bnit* diflmnoa
modd.
iiBdTMbnology"
AwMtnnt. GitUnbuig, IN.
Sklanw, R.. and V. Minbalh. 1879.
Expaitenoa in IMPACT MocUing of Con$l«
Tanaia Fourth Sympotbm OB Turbulmce,
Dimittan and Ait Polhition. Iteno. NV.
SUanw. R.. J. Wlaoa. A. J. Patrick aad V.
MtaabaUa. 1B76. Rough Tamia ModaUng.
total emission rate (optionally classified by
gravitational settling velocity) and decay
coefficient; far stack sources, stack height,
eflDueat tevapereture. efflueat exit velocity.
stack radius (inner), emission rate, end
ground elevation (optional);
For buUdiiig sources, height, length aad
, »Jih A...I M.J •!••'*— f
wioin, sno oneuianoBj i
widumd ttimtattinL
IMPACT may be used to model any inert
Mrihiomt
MPACTmay be used to modal SO* SOr.
(depends upoo
Saminar78.CtoarLriM.CA.
SUaraw. R.. and K. Tran. 1978. Tha
NEWEST Wind Ftold Modal with
ApplicaUoutoThatinalljrDrivanDninaga
WindinMaantadiioiMTamiii.Pnaantadat
tba AMS Moating, Lafca Tahoa. NV.
Wacfctor, D.. and R. Londargan. 1964.
Evaluation of Gompln Tttrain Air Quality
Simulation Modala. EPA Publication No,
BPA-4SO/4-M-017. UA 1
Up to 20 point count* and JO a
mayb*trMtod(giMtarBUinbtrofMurcw
nay b* trotted by inoMting common block
Protection Agency. Raaaarch Triangle Park.
NC
•4 LONGZ
•Wind «peed and meaauremeat height, wind
profile exponent!, wind direction ttaadard
deviettoni (turbulent intentlUa*). mixing
height, air laaiperatttre, verUcai potential
Receptor date requirement* are:
coordinate!, ground elevation*
c. Output
Priated ou^ut Inrliulaa'
Total co&ceatratfon due to eauaaions Iconi
ueer-apacified aource groupa. including the
combined emlnlon* from all eourcea (with
optional allowance for depletion by
UMd
Ekntad invmion* m oomidmad.
BJorkhiad. J. R, end J. F. Bowen. 1982.
Uaert fnstncttoiu far the SHORTZ end
LONGZ Computer Program*. Volume* I end
n.BPAPiibUcetiOBNaBPA-«03/9-8J-OM.
US. BDviromnental Protection Agency,
RegtaalD, Philadelphia. PA.
la a cllmatnlnglc
LONGZ may be u*ed to mode, priaury
polhitants. Settling and deporittoo an
A •!«_& itleelBiies aln • at atsititllln m**A •^^•mltm
AIHTW "i>i>*IB>rfTffllli iPlT^liiy mt*m B.ajffaja^iy
dependent noBdivergeBtwiad field is
fa^P^'ltiyi Wlaft T'BglT *** T^fltiplff ITJttti
^fg^g §paa.Miw.n*||^|||f Myl*l* ^ PfliifflB
t.^ttnl.yi.f
LVaticalWittdSf**!
Vertical wind speed Is treated at each wiad
site, user spedfled or extrapolated from
surface data. Interpolated is accomplished as
~^ of the r^"-— Ji——i—-• —«-j •»-•-• . •
•tte model ia antlaUe v pert of UNAMAP
{Verdon 8). tie cooqiutar code la anUabla
NettOMl Technical laibraSoaService. VS.
eld.VA
LONGZ applies aaarspedfied locations far
nontois* Ricpt Msumwi
to be at ground level
22181. Phone: (703) 487-18M.
UlNCZntUtmtheateady^tateunivariate
GeuariaiBhBae fomulaUon far both urban
and raral area* in flat or complex ternla to
and/or eaaual)
• PhBMriaeeo>na.loaaofB]arkhuidand
Bowen (1982) are ueed.
and
f
from up to 144100
.
r the technique of
for the OBP1CT method (see
User Guide, Fabiick aad Haas. 1980).
L Vertfco/ittpersJajt
A three dimensional dlftisMOr field la.
froacbea« exceeds itack
exit velocity.
H^akarfb^A ^nA.M'Al'.iMai «4 ^••^ee«jt
rmtmJG* rimCCTCH K CPUOQ
poUutants with no aattUag velocity.
Tilted phme to need far poUutaats with
eettliag velocity spedfled.
Buoyaacy-indnced dlsparskn to treated
(Briggs.1972).
fll. rAJVlOBi naflSOvai
Phytncal removal la treated using
. exponential decay. HalMUe It input by the
K.^. j—— -fc - jT_. A.W.» ^Ma*Blj^^l^fl*l) •»•«!•
ffr "^"TJ*BBTTI "* ""T TwIIITBit'T" HnnlT^
1.0NCZcaBbeusedoaactse4y«asebasis
la lieu,of a preferred model If It caa be
Wad field is homogeMout aad steady-
wind tpxd pimli< OTpoB-tott m
gM^Mt1T* " "ffftl ftlff*T"r *^«^a« •*•!
the model
speed. Deftmlt vthiea are spedfled la
Bforkhmd aad Bowers (1962).
-------
/ Vol 58.
. July 20. 19B3 /
Vertical wind spaed Is asaomed equal to
Pollutants an initially uniformly
dhrtribnted within each wind dfr "
MCtOT- A*
Is then used to
at sector boundaries.
k. Vertical Ditpmtiott
Vertical dt
write*! turb
adjustment* to pli
I* derived from input
it intensities using
i tab
[ght and rate of
plunui powth with downwind dltlmio
^edfied In BJorithind and Bower* (I982J.
I
Uaart ln*ti\MDOM te the SHOKTZ tad
lXM4GZCooM>«tsfPiijgiaiii«.VoluaaalaBdn.
EPA Put-Urethra Mo BP A 90V9 M 00*
US.BnviromneiitalPlot*etioaAf**ej.
BaateiIIl.PUladelpUa.PA.
9M_Maryland PewerPkrtSWnfPr^rs.
{PPSP) Medal
Jtyweaca*
Biowv.IL.19U.Tba Maryland Fow«
Plaa*aWn§ Program (PPSPJ Air Quality
Modal Ihar-aCuisla. Bat No. PPSP-UP-3*.
Pnpared te Maryland Department of Natural
Beaoufees,*jyEi
I.MD.Q4TIS
No. PB 82-238387)
Weil. JJC. and ftP; Bnwrav. 19*2. Tb»
Maryland PPg Pimento* Model teTall
Stack*. Bat No. FPSP-MP-M. Prepared i
82-2191Sal
Cnlv* Mira& MBrisittsi
mon.MD.(NTISNaPB
lawavailabto
: The modeJ code and tact data an
availabteonMDgnetictapeteacdftofttlO
fruuu . . '
Power Plant Siting Pngnio, Dwatnanataf
Natunl Rasourc*a.Tawaai!
ABttntrt
PPSPisa
applicable to taU stack* In eithar rural or
urta«iataa*.butinteraiBinBitl*eMwaal))r
Bat (ana •
I* based one
W _
te elevated sonic**a*»aaed;~(3) Bi
ploBHriaBiasmulaateooMwectivei
copdiaffii*aniadKded;and(4}pluiB«
penetrationolelevatsdstable layer*hi
by Bdams- (1U4) modeL
a. Recammndatiamfeflttfilatatj Ubv
PPSP can be used If ft cm be
to estiMDta concentr*tfae» e*jnl
those oravidad bribe tmierredmodal tea
mu*t ba executed in
alent mode.
ib*naadonaca*e-by-caaab**is
ullMofajiratirradinadeliifitcaabe
3J. that PPSP is more appropriate tetha
•n^a*t4lliF AVWfelfa^Bt^Hi Ilk ihtsl g^^^ l^bM aaa.*M^Kl
te the application should ba
Source dais, ntniiteoiants ant Emiatton
rate (monthly rates opttonaa physical clack
height, stack gaa exit velocity, stack Inside
•BPA
m acptBwHift en angRM of plunMr
h. Jfetfentef MM*-
Wind speeds an corrected f» release
height based on power law variation, with
different exponents for different lUbility
da**** and variable reference height (7
outen to default). Wind speed power law
exponents an a 10.(US. OJO. IU5.030. and
0.30 far HabUftjr dasaa* A thravgh P,
h0ight(asb]Ktonliw)ls.al*ft
required. Wind speed profile exponents (one
fcr**di*laMlityclaMfaf«r«)nMlfo» •
data ami
tbyaeraethod
Urban
ctabl*c*jest«(tafctat]r
each Ox tha five noeptor rings*
1*76) if induded (using AH/3.5).
dutnt
Highaat and aecond highest c
telh*y«ar*4e«diracafjtarlar
times of 1.3. and Mtaan, fte»
Notlnalad.
NbttiwCwL
•elected averaging I
iUchMDrha2.4, n.
».S. or ti hours; _ ^
Annual arittunettc arenga at aacn receptor;
and
For tech day, the highest t-hourawt Jfr
|»0/MeoW
PM*» to a CfeMtlaa phjave nurfes.
*. FoUtrtont 7>pe*
Well. JIC and
Maryland
•, 1982. The
Mfartril
stacks. Ret No. PPSP MP-36. Pnpand te
Maryland Departajanto{Naiu«l BMnmcM.
Prapandby EsviiQDnMiiial Cantar» Martm
Marietta CDrpo(ation.B^Uin>an. Mary land,
(NTISKci.?B«Z-U9lSS)
pollutants. Settling *ad
tnatcd,.
i Soun»-A«eepitorRe/at/onsA
-------
380M Fwfcnl
/ VoL 88. No.-137 / Taeaxiay, |uly 20.19W / Hides and Ragalrtc
Tilt model coda la available oa At
Support Canter far Regulatory Air Modeii
BullatuLBoard System and alto tan the
Nationd Technical Information Service (IM
Afitfjuit
MBSOfUFF n it a abort mm. ncknal
scab puff model designed to calculate
concentration* of up to 8 pollutant fpedee
(SOj. SO*. NQ» HNO», Nb^Transpart, puff
growth, rhomhil tmiifrtfimHon, and ml
and diy deposition an accounted, far in the
_.>j_i .
nlOneii
Then It BO *p*clnc recommendation at the
present time. The model may be used on i
ct*e-by-case basis.
(1)
-Gridded wind fields an computed for 2
layers; bootidiiy layer iad tbow the mixtd
layv. Upper alrJiwUuaodtdati and hourly
Mofw»«ni»itiMiiMd to obtain spattalljr •
miww UiT oontpMMHit itoldt tt houny
iatannl*. UK giichtod field* en computed br
lataroojaUoB beti^en KrtloBi to tto j-
MESOPAC D pnpnxMwr.
LV«tioi/IMiitf5|Nwd
Vertical wind* •nauufflnt to baxwo.
diiaeto time
> growth i*
tmtortamtalgrowtli
equation* fit to sterna y curves of Turner out
to 100km. At dtoancMgnatorthan lOOkm.
growth it determined by the rate given
b. lapOt .m~f—.....*,,„-
Requ^input date indude four ty
Input control parameters and selected
optional. (3) sur
JDlutliiltiPOi (4J »mmjaj mam TniiimTiiB
Dttt fan up to 29 furie«c* NttiOBil
wMtatr SoniDi iteUotti i&d up to 10 uppv
air stations may be consMend. Spatially
variable fields at hour intervals ofwtnds.
mixing height, stability dats, and relevant
turbulence parameters an derived by
MESOPACtUu»meteorolosjlcal .
pnproceiaoi innsjiaiii described in the User
GuJde.
Source1 eno emitsioB date tor up to 25
point source* and/or up to Sana source* can
location mgridcoordinatos, stack height edi
VNoaty Vw tvmpcutimt And mriiftoit ntos
for the pollutant to be modeled.
ReceptorQ^tanqutnmenU!Uptoa40X
40gridmaybeusedandDO»fridded
nceptar locattoos may te consUend.
c.Outp«x
Uae printer output includes; All input
pemmotars. opoonaily selected arrays of
spades at apeclfied> ttms) Intervals.
Line printer contour plots output from
MESOFILB n post-pfocessor protxam.
array to disk/tape far each hour.
J «M f*.*^^t-±
, Heflter(10B5).
Puff growm is a function of stability class
and changes in stability an treated.
Optionally, user Input plume
jiWJft • t- -—--. |-^ r • *
coeiiiciffnif may B*V
L Vartfan/CuTentoo
For pufli anillted at an efletUve etack
MdwhichtoleecthaBtneinixiMhai
BftiXiM leWeW m DCnlalDHL Fflf I
above memhrtht height, no efisct at the
yound uccufi.
Hourly dumlcal
Drydep
arwiftenca
Wet removal may becontidend If hourly
«^^k«^B^k^41j^» iiaiia *^n j^---,*
pnctpuanon oav an input.
Reeulte of leete far aome model parametan
Sdn. J. i. F. W. Luanann. A. Ban. S. R.
Hanna. 1984. Dewtopmant of Ow
MBSOPUFF OOUpenion Model BPA
P^ltoto ^ jft-WVM-OS?. UA
BBVUQO)BMD«U noCMuoo AM&CTe RSMUCO
Wangle Park, NC
iXU
tOSSOfUFf n ta a Gauatfta puff
aupaipoaiuoD HUNlel ...
Up to five pollutant fpedM nay be
Wang. LT. aadTt. Waldron. 1MO. Ueer'a
Culdetor MlPDtt iaseoscals Transport.
Diflusion, and Deposition Model for
Industrial SounmBMSCM»l.lUR(R2).
ConibusdanBnglnesiiiig.NewburyPark.CA.
be need ID *fc^pi»|ii* 3*
conomtntioiu of nltUvely nonnecttve
poUtttenti from up to 10 eepente stacks.
•• necroiniiipiiciwinriwywrji^ijiiiMni^ c/xv
Thaw it no specific ncoaunMubtioa at the
pneeat tine. T1» MTDDIS Model may be
uted oa a ceee-by-ceie betis.
b. Input JtegufauiHUiti
data nqui
ti
. a Emission
rate, physical steck height, stack gas exit
velodry, stack inside diameter, stack gat
temparatun, and location.
Meteorological date requirements- an:
Hourly sornwe weather data, from up to 10
stations. Indudmg ctoud ceiling, wind
dhectfoB. wind speed, temperature, opaque
cloud cover and ^^ - •
applicatt
IfthMearenot
the NWS daily mbdag heights will
be need by the program. A singw upper air
•oundiag station far the region ii Msumed.
For eadi model run, air tntectorie* an
generated fa a 48-how period, and therefore.
alao nqutawdbV the model at input, in order
to generate hourly mixing heights far the
modeled period. ^
c. Output
Printed ou
include
TabiilaftM of homfr meteorological
etabilitr
and
S
uiV flidfttv outout nr toft Momo
period, .
d.7ypeo/MboW
MIDUS to aCauedan puff modal
e.Mhitaitt7>pe*
MTTOIS can be uied to model primary
poUutanta.Drydepo(itionistnetad.
MTDINS treete op to 10 point eourcee.
Up 10 three recunguler receptor gridt may
Decpedfiedbytheueer.
0» PfuiM BtanovJor.
Brigp (1871, U72) plum* riae fonnulu are
Up to 28 point
and/or up to 9 ana
Briggs (W75) plume rise eonaUons an
^.- * tea«»t» » JI •> <• vaiKaaiaBm^ ^^**^A^mM*um* »+%^
VTTTJI '""^iro"^ pffTimT pTliTTfBT1!"! mfnH
bfuoytacy ftg COBI put»>d to tiht modflL : •
FuBU^atfoBof pufis is considered andmay
reflection calculatkHis at t *' -
Aniaa^etlctepacopyoriheFORTRAN
cndmgandthe uesr-s guide an available far
• cost of $100 from: Or. IT. Wang.
If ptaMhei*^ exceeds nilxiai height
f»«^level^ T-m—n--
„ Inc. 2421 Wert
HlUcmt Drive. Newbury Park. CA10320.
Abanet .. ". .
MTDDISii*varlable^ra)icloryGau>(tai
h.Nad*oaa«fiv%id»
Wind tpetA end wteddincttoM at each.
variation and dincUon canvenUns an bated
on linear i
bylnvtB(1970).
I win*
-------
Twltnt
/VoL.SB;Nci.:ia7
, July '»0.' 1993.? Rubs and Regulations 38887
t
i ofHeflter (1980) to calculate the
ctive transport wind speed and direction.
Vertical wind ipMd it assumed equal to
\. Horizontal Ditpenion
Transport-
coefficients tern i
dispersion
(1980) are used.
k. Vertical Ditpenion
Transport-tinMMiependent dispersion
j_LLjiLlltjil_aLiuLljs fjiiiniMiii laWle%.M> f^AMl!1 «_ ——•—-J
OMnicMnis iran IM&UM i* VBUI w uwo.
L Chemical Tran$fonnation
OMmicu buisionoctioof mtmtod
exponential decay. Half-list to input by
m. PAytfcaf Jtanovaf
Dry deposition to treated. User input
deposition velocity to required.
WM deposition is treated. User input
hourly precipitation rait iad precipitation
layer deth or cloud oiling height an
n. Are/notion SHidte
Non0 cited*
•.19 Models 3141 and 4141
Reference
Enviroplan. Inc. 1881. Usert Manual for
Bnviroplan's Modtl 3141 tnd Model 4141.
Bnviroplan, inc.. West Orange. N|.
A magnetic tape copy of the FORTRAN
coding and the user's guide an available for.
• cost of $1,900 from: Environplan, u&. 59
Mala Street. WMI Onap. NJ 07052.
Abttract
Modal* 3141 and 4141 an modlflcartmii of
CRSTER (UNAMAP VERSION 3) and an
applicable to oomptex terrain particularly
wha»i«»pt«rtawtion approximately
..... '
model utillzM int
ditplacenwnt prootdun* i
ithaiMimmmttdOTriopedfa
ilate Bound
Ldlcpanton
i an aerial
t study tnd ground leva!
and for a powar plant located la
3141W4141 can bauMdlf It cube .
equivalent to thoia ptovidad Qy tM puimag
model tor a given application. 3141 or 4141
must be executed in ft* equivalent mode.
3l41tt4141canbeuetaonecae*-by-«aee
bart la Ueu of a prefcmd modal If h can be
demoMtratod. ndag the criteria in Section
3.2, that 3141 or 4141 to men appropriate far
the •padflc application, b thto caae the
modal optJoni/modaa wfaicb an moat ,
> for the application ahould be
b. Input JtoqumnrMnar
Source date lamilnmanti are: Kmttaton
rate, physical stack height «tack gas exM
velocity, stack inside diameter. fUck gas exit
rtnddtaaetla
rind
fadiLAc
include*:
dhigb
ntratic
tampmtun. and mixing height Actual
anemometer height (a smgle value) is also
lor MKB ftatwliry uj^§a|| tjni iMjuifeM if flDHnte
diieim input.
Raonrtor data raquirmnanU «rr. Distamo of
MCa 01 fLvt faKefptOeT ito^* IBu EVG0|ltQBa>
elevMlon. .
c. Output
Printed
far the year at each receptor for avenginf.
times of 1,3. and 34 hours, phis a user*
•elected averaging tine which may be 2..4,
6.8, or 12 hours.
Annual arithmetic average at each receptor.
For each day, the highest 1-hour and 24-
hour concentrations over the receptor, field.
d. Type of Model
3141 and 4141 an Gaussian plume models.
e. Pollutant Typm
3141 and 4141 may he used to model non-
reecttve pollutants. Settling and depoaitton
ara not traated.
1L Sourcv-Jtocsptor Ae/otioiisnip
Up to 19 point sources are treated.
No area sources an treated.
All point sources an assumed to be
Unique (tack height to used for each
RMHrtor loctttont wiMtridM
azimuths (every 10 degrees) and >
spedfled radial distance*.
spedfle
Unique topographic ele
ation to need far
g. Plume Bchavfer
(1969, ion, 1972) final phone rise
If phone height exceeds ml
a receptor location after terrain i
concentration to assumed equal to aaro*
h. /ffiriuuitaf Wuuu
Wind speeds an corrected fcfraleaM
height based on power law variation
-— *-"—'! (1959). difflwent
1»—|«%lh|i—.^ ntAtaVM RviWfe>tamta lla^Mi
an Oio. ai6, a20. «U5,0 JO. and OJO for
stability classes A through P, respectively.
Constant, uniform (steady-state) wind to
assumed within each hour. •,
i. Vertical WmfSpeea'
Vertical wind speed is
equal to
j. Horisontol Ditptnion
Dispersion coefficient* an PasquiU-Glffbrd
coefBcients from Tuner (1969).
Dispersion to adjusted to 60 minute
•wngjog How by OIM nnh poww ?uto
(Glffard.1975).
1975) to Included.
k. V
theBPA
Dispersion coaOdaati an PasquiU-CUmrd
eftSentf ftwnrTumer (1969). -
ion
Bwwancy-induced dis
1975) to included.
Not mated.
m. Phytical Removal
Not treated.
JL Kmlaation Studio*
Ellis. KM., P.C Liu. and C Runyon. 1979.
"Comparison of Predicted and Measured
Concentrations for 54 Alternative Models of
Phime Transport In Complex Terrain,
Presented in APCA Annual Conference.
Cincinnati, OH.
Ellis, H.M.. P.C Liu. and C Runyon. 1980.
Comparison of Predicted and Measured
Concentrations for 58 Alternative Models of
Plume Transport in Complex Terrain. Journal
of the Air Pollution Control Attodatioa.
30(6): 670-875.
Londergan. R.. D. Minott. D. Wachter. T.
Kincaid and D. BoniteU. Evaluation of Rural
Air Quality Simubtion Models. EPA
Publication No. EPA-4SO/4-83-003.
Environmental Protection Agency, Research
Triangle Park. NC
Wackter, D.. and R. Londergan. 1984.
Evaluation of Complex Terrain Air Quality
Simulation Model*. EPA Publication No.
EPA-450/4-84-017. V& BnvironmentBl
Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park.
NC
B.14 MULTIMAX
Refenac*
Mpeer. JJl. 1979. MULTIMAX: An Air
Dispnsion Modeling Program for Multiple
Sources, Receptors, and Concentntioii
Averages. Shall Development Company,
Westhottow Research Center. P.O. Box 1380,
Houston, TX. (NTIS No. PB 80-170176).
AvalTaUttr
The above report to available tram NTIS
($16.95 for paper copy: $5.95 on microfiche).
The accession, number far the computer tape
for MULTIMAX to PB 80-170160. and the
cost to $370.00. Requests should be sent to:
Computer Products, National Technical
Information Service. US. Department of
Commerce. 5825 Port Royal Road.
Springfield. VA 22161. Phone: (703) 487-
4650.
Xosfroct
MULTIMAX to a Gaussian plume model
applicable to both urban and rural anas. It
can be used to calculate highest tod second-
highest conceotntions, for each of several
averaging times due to up to 100 sources
arbitrarily located.
a. Jtoommadatiofu/br Begutatwy Ute
MULTIMAX can be used if it can be
flffiMMtt^ri^yft to estimate oonoantrauons
equivalent to those provided by the preferred
model far a given application. MULTIMAX
must be executed in the equivalent mode.
MULTIMAX can be used on a case-bycase
bads iaUau of a preferred model if it can be
3.2. mat MULTIMAX to mon appropriate far
the specific application. Is thto case tbe
model options/modes which an most
appropriate for the application should be
-------
386B3 Federal KeyUter 7 Vol Sft, Na 137 / Tuesday. July 20. 1983 / Bids* and EagalaUoiu
b. Input Requ
Saw* data requirements ire: Emiuioa
rate, physical slack height. stack g«s exit
velocity, stack inside OIHBMBK. and slack gas
temperature. . «
Meteorological data requirements are:
Hourly suite* wMtbtr Ate fionlfaa EPA
meteorological ptaproceesor program.
PrapzooMxor •output include* hourly stability
class, wind direction, wind speed,
temperature, and mixing heignt Actual
anemometer height fa tingle value) is also
required Wind speed profile exponents {DM
far each stability class) tie required If on-stte
data tn input.
swcapsflr. teoinnmsBts an* individual
eptor points. eves sj&d dfdas oiiecepiors.
Six stablllrjr classes an usad. with Turner
ctasTtoeated a dm «. Amngtaglins "
adhwtnwBt h optfanaL
adiustments made for variatiaai ia
Six stesllHy tlajsis are need. wttaTumec-
class 7 treated as Class 6.
Perfect reflection at the ground is attuned.
Mixing height is accounted for with
multiple reflections until (he wrticeJ phsne
nceptnr*pojlfit vocations. receptor Usa1 end
points, and receptor circle center and radius
aeifoed in either cartesian or polar
coordinates.
c. Output _.
second-highest concentration* Jor the year at
each sacapterfaraiiaiegjrg time of 1.3. and
24 boura. Anaaol aritbaatic average at aaca
data and result*.
A-TypeofMoM
MULTIMAX Is a Gaussian plume modal.
e. A9tfutBi>( 7>pe»
MULTIMAX may be used to model
Londergan.1t.tL Mnolt.1>. Wackter.T.
Klncsid. and a Bonltata. MM. T '
t Models. SPA
r»e. SPA-eJO/a-iJ-OM. US.
Environmental Protect*!
Trfuglsy-PiVKo WG •
B.1S
D MB point
may So Input
sources are not traated.
PointsourcMmaybeatai
Iteiqiw «aack height it tm
Unique topofraphlceiavatlon is used tor
eacbnceptor; must bafaelow top of stack.
Receptor* can be defined indWduanf. or
along lines or arcs..
aVigae (19M. l«n. lt»J)
ds mixiaghaigbt,
Malik. KUL and & Baldwin. 1MO.
desimagflbe
J> - J _^ e. j^ «*-
•fllVBCwMl UK Mf* Diy^B
Program Supervisor. Air Quality
ahoaUho
MULT&MX
final sjeusae rias
If plume height
concentratioos downwind an assumed equal
to zero.
Wlad spaed* ancormcted fornlaase
height based on power law tnrianon
exponents ownOaManmls(l«5tjL dIAnat
elMl LfmjiJtrtei A^ s^MieBeiavHt aiftsslMlM^ a
re&r«nceheight«10 metenTlCne
collocated, to enheaoad
.^ —*. — i*_
spactnfaiions, us
•ssmed withkt ASOB Jiouc,
distorfion from directional whk
SCSTBR CM be used If It can be
d is
«inaito
model far ajtven application. SCSIBK must
OB a
ad|ustaMa*t aaade te
rougluess.
3.2,thatSCSTBRis
options/mod
tarttja
**H
rate, stack gas exit velocity, stack gas '
tempetatun. stack exit diameter, physical
stack MsjM. elevation of stack base, and
coordinates of stack location. The variable
emission data can be jnaniUy or.]
lirec
Metaorologkaldati
Hourly surface weatl*
nti
tram the HPA
_ lpul iadudes sourly stability
class wind dincOee.. wind speed.
temperature, and mixing hetght Actual
anemometer height (a single value) Is
breach stability dees) an
Receptor data requirements an: Cartesian
coordinates and elevations of awUvidMal
receptors; distances of receptor rings, with
elevation of each receptor; uceptorgdd
networks, with elevation of each receptor.
Any combination of (he three ssceptor
i«««4 tUMAa • * * " " "
input types i
aooncept
c. Output
lourpi
Highest and second highest (
far the year at ead receptor sor avenging
tunes of 1-. 3-. and 24-hours. a user-nUcted
avenging time which may be 3-12 noun,
andnlsolugfcMblefar t-.».e»d-r< hours
and the highest 1 hmsr eaaTjl htear
concentrations over the receptor field far
each day considered.
Optlnaeleiegaslh leiisnetpsitlneHher
binary cc fixed block formal includes: All 1-
houri
highest k 3-. and 14^
andasaual
SCSnt as • Gs
SCSTBR may be used to modal primary
poUutants. Settling and deposition an not
treated.
and up to MO
acsmt «ees Brtggs (199% i*n. i*rsj
final phime Tin formulas. Traneitionil plume
risetsoptiomn.
SCSTBR cootams options to Incorporate
wind directional shear with a plume
adhisonentandauset^inputstabitllr-
fan
I
-------
s
FrfenJ Regtartsjr f VdL M, NP. iar /Tuesday. July 20. 1993 / Rul«f inditagutifloM 33869
h.Jtoi
Wind speeds an corrected far nlease
height based on power law exponents from
D«Mamis(1959rdiflerent exponents far
different stability classes; default refennce
height of 7m. Default exponents are 0.10,
0.1S, 0.20.0.25. OJO. and OM for stability
classes A through F, respectively.
Steady-state wind is assumed within a
given hour.
Optional consideration of plume distortion
due to user-input, stability-dependent wind-
direction shear gradients. •
I Vertical Wind Speed
Vertical wind speed is assumed equal to
Rural dispersion coefficients Cram Turner
(1969) an used.
Six stability classes ait used.
Ik VtetfcxdJXtpenfcR
RWdisimion coefficients from Turner
(1989) an used.
Six stability classes an used.
An option*! tMt far plum* height above
ixinglMight Man terrain adjustment U
an treated using
exponential decay. Half-life U iaput by the
Chemical transfo
ati
m. Phy*ieal Removal
Physical removal U Mated using
exponential decay. Half-life if Input by the
Londergan. R., D. Mlnott. & Wecber, T.
Kincaid and D.Bonitata.1943. Evaluation of
Runl Air Quality Simulation Models. EPA
Publication No. BPA-450/4-63-003. US..
l PiotMtiQtt
B.17 PadflcCasandETactrk
User's Manual far Padfk Gas and Electric
PLUMES Modal, 1981. Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, San Prancisco, CA.
Availability
The User's Manual wiUba supplied for
coat of reproduction. An IBM version of the
model can ba obtained on a user euppaad
tape free of charge from: Mr. Robert &
Swansea, Pacific Gas and Electric Company,
24S Market Street Rm. 481, San Prandsco,
CA 94108. ' •
Abttnct . . _ .
PLUMBS is a steady-state <
model applicable to both rural and
anas in uneven terrain. Pollutant
concentrations at 500 receptors from up to 10
sources with up to IS stacks each can be
inputs. Themodel in its "baste" mod* If,
similar to CRSTER and MPTBR.!
an available that allow
layer and cm
winddtaectio
alsh
snnad.ttiMphjB.liy
sideratio
with height Initial
i(advective)wtnd
.andcfaeniica]
speed.terrai«
•'transformation of pollutants.
DifferanoM that exist between PLUMES
and CKSTER an in the following anas:
Stability class determination, hourly mixing
height schemes, hourly stable iayardaja.
randomiiation of wind direction, extent of
data set required far preprocessing
meteorological data inputs.
a. Jtocoaunendotiaiu for .Regulatory Ute
PLUMES can be used if It can be
demonstrated to estimate concentrations
equivalent to those provided by tha pnfernd
model tor a given application. PLUMBS must
be executed in the equivalent mod*.
PLUMES can ba used on a ca**oy-ea*e
basis in lieu of a pnfamd modal If it can.bs
3.2, that PLUMES is mom appropriate for the
specific application. In this case the model
options/modes which an most appropriate
for tha application should ba used.
Source date requirement* ant Cartesian or
polar coordinates of each source with stock
height, diameter, gas tempentun. and exit
velocity for each stack.
Meteorologk ' '
Surfaoa data— hourly meteorological data
including wind direction, wind speed,
temperatun, and either calling height and
total sky cover or sigma A or Data T
depending on how stability is computed;
staMa layer data either NOG data arsHa
specific user supplied dats>
Receptor data nquiremen
or pohr cooroiixt>t of «c*i fiopftof*
c. Output
Printed outpttt Inchutar.
rUghait and second highest concentrations
far the year printed out at each receptor far
averaging times of 1. 9. and M-hours. phis •
uetr-Mlected averaging time which may ba 2,
4. 6. B. or 12 hours.
Annual arithmetic avenge at each receptor.
Por each day. the higbeet 1-hour and 24-
hour concantratkins over the receptor fiald
Howriy eAcMw alack height and aUsetrva
stack haUit distributions.
c nf
e. Pollutant Typet
PLUMBS may ba used to modal primary
pollutant*. Chemical.transfermations of
pollutants are tnated by exponential decay
and/or ozone limiting procedures.
t Soum-Receptor Relationship
Cm input up to 10 separate sources with
up to IS stacks par source.
Unique stack height far each source.
Rectangular or circular receptor locations (up
to 500) can be either model generated or user
input
Terrain considerations:
When plume rise, H, is above the stable
layer top concentration estimates will only be
calculated for receptors at or above the stable
layer top. If the receptor is below tha stable
layer top. then the concentration Is taro.
When plume rise falls within the stable
layer, eoncemtration estimates will be only
caludated for receptors located within this
region. If the receptor height is above or
below the stable top, then the concentration
Is sera.
When plume rise falls below the stable
layer and the receptor height is above the
stable layer base, then the concentration is
saro. If the receptor height Is below the stable
layer base, the receptor height Is redefined.
PLUMBS uses Briggs (197S) final phime
rise formulas.
Expansion of plumes within and above a
stable layer 1s treated.
Ik. Harfaonfol Winds
User-supplied hourly wind directions are
nad to naanati, S. 10. and 22.5 degrees.
(The S. 10 and 2lS degree values an
randomly modified to nearest whole degree
within the intervals).
PLUMBS employs the extrapoiatad mean
wind speed at stack height whan the affective
stack height Is aqual to or toss than the height
of tha inversion base above ground. If tha
plume rises Into a stable layer, a separata
' - > is used.
at, uniform (steady state) wind
within each hour.
L Vertical Wind Speed
Vertical wind spaed is assumed equal to
far the data peri
above a
d p
b
1 urban , Hourly (
Cumulative number of exceedannas of 1
hour and 24-hour specified values far all
recepton during tha satin MiUumluglur
data period. Than specified varuaswffl
normally ba National and State Ambient Air
Quality Standards.
ter readable output includes: .
concentrations for each lacaptor on
magnetic tape.
].HohtoatalDitpeitioa
right (ZJ Six stability classes an deflnad by sither
. radiation Index and wind speed (STAR).
wind direction-fluctuation, or temparatiifa
Computer file for
The file stores the"
spedfled time peri
nceptorfartbeentini
period far Input into a user i
to pinttlog rotttin
1-hour (or other
alkmpruma rise Into or thnogat
d.Typeo/MooW - . . v
PLUMBS If • Ganssian phnat model
> stability class is based on wind
dincttOB fioctUertioiis or tmptcktun i*ipw
rate and may be modified according to the
method of Mttehall and Timbre (1979).
Dispersion curves an (com Turner (1969).
k. Vertfco/ aspersion
Six stability classes an defined by either
radiation index and wind spaed (STAR),
wind direction fluctuations, or tampantun
lapse nte.
Nighttime stability class is based on wind
dbactton fluctuations or tampantun laspa
rate and modified according to tha method ot
Dispersion curves an from Turner (1969).
-------
3M70 Fadeni jtagjajeg J V«I M. Not 137 / Tteaday. July 20. 1M3 / Raja* and
Mixing height* can tMlnlMMll/
orextonallytpecifiad.
Physical ajamai at
*»pnttenriil decay. JJaJMUe is input by the
partitioning prafike,.
** JU^anjiniLijijnai a^aJal
.,D. MtacMtD. Wadf*n,T.
KlncBid ad B. BonltMa. 1983. Evaluation td
Runi Air Qudity Simulation Model*. EPA
Publication No. EPA-4SO/4-W-OM. O&
otection Ajmcy,
PLMSTAR lncorpgta«Ma»li«hlly
oondMMd vmloo of UM AtkinaoB et aL
(1M2) photochemical
1W4.
Evduatton of Goim>l«cT«nln Air Quality
KPA-«9tf 4-S4-017.
PntKtkw AfBDCjr.
NC
Bnvtammanttl
contalnt 62 reaction* Involving 38 *pacta«,
including 8 cUttetof aqaaafe praCHrtan. Tha
poflutant oonc*atx>tk>o**ncnnputadb|'
nunaficaHy intaantinfl tba QOBllDMrldMttc
in* Phytictu Ruxtovol
DrydepoiWonofOj.NOfcHKOj.l'AM,
SO*, ud S0«> i> btMd on dM JBodd of
•mtr'fT mrr lurtiiiirti in tht
2ZZ<«L
Uirmann. F. W.. a A. Goddtn aad A.C
Lloyd. 1982.Ta»m iluiiaMBIlaMlCilattad
SndlMlr. Ta«i of tha PLMSTABBaadtra
PJanv MooUPaMaatadat Shi Tkiai)ptat
GoaBnnot oa AppUeatfoH of Ab Polunlon
MMMmlogy, San Antonio. TX
' Goddea.aindP.Lmnnn.1M3.
Pnrilnp«»»l of tb» PLMSTAKModal and its
,^^-iXT^is^ stssgsir'*'"
Inc. Nevbury Park. CA,
K. L, Alexander. F.Lunnan. ndO.
Documaat No. M-2208-1M.
RMawh ft Tccb^ojjr. toc^ Nmfaurf Ark.
CA.
tfoollocalM aovffoaaj in
Th« abov* mport and *
available boo: Oompukir
hydrocarbon*. NOx and SOk
PlMSCARki
behavior of
plum, nniltiag fro. maj
a approach attom
ahaeaBaUMal .
modal indudtt tha capability faraei
af traiariailM at anr la»at«^ial
Wwtara Oil and Ca* Aaaodatian. Lot
Angato».CA.
0UWIBIQ
I
-------
Bjat>taa 7 VoL HA. No. 137 7 Tirtadty. July 20. J9M / Rulaa" and Regulations 3M71
—H^l——1 —JB^^^ El»il ___^U^— ^AHaB^Ul^M — * * *•
opncai anaos ano iiiiiBCT depoaiuQtt of point
or area source amiaiions. Addenda to the
User's Manual were prepared in Februarv
19U to ailcw execution of PLUVUB Band '
the te«t cases M the UMVAC compute. .
a. IbcoaimmdationfforRegulatoty Urn
The Plum* Visibility Modal (PLUVUBII)
maybeusedonaca*e-by-cBsebe*i».tohen
applying PLUVUEO to aesess the visual •
Impact of • plum*, the following pracautioni
should be taken to avoid the pontbllHy of
User-specified wind speed (and dincttoa
far an observer based run) are
calculation.
t. Treat the optical effects of NO» and
paitides separately as well as together to
avoid cancaUatkn of r^ absorption with
2. Examine the visual impact of the plume
in 0.1 (or 0), as, and 1J) times the expected
level of paruculate matter In the background
air.
3. Examine the visual Impact of the plume
r the fuU range of obser-var-plume-sun
Vertical wind speed is assumed equal to
mo.
\. Horizontal Dttj*nioa ?
Uav specified DMSJW widtha. or width.
computad from either FwauUl-Clftxd-
Tunter cume (Turner. 1969) or TVA cum*
(Carpenter. etaL. 1971) are used la PLUVUB.
k. Vertical Ditpmtoa
User specified plume depths, or computer
from PasquUl-Giflard-Turnar curves (Turner,
1969) or TVA curves (Carpenter, at aL. 1971)
anusadmPLUVUB.
TWiiBaMan u vvtttuRwi w pwrt of
UNAMAP (Version flj. The computer code Is
available OB magnetic tape from: Computer
Products, National Technical Information
Sefvlcav U«S, Pffnar*11"118* of Commerce*
Springfield. VA 22161. Phone; (703) 487-
4660
ADttfOCt
PAL-DS is an acronym tor this point, area.
and Una eourea algorithm and to a method of
Caiustan-phime steadystate asnunpttotts.
The algorUhm can be used far astfanating
b. Input toqninmmtt
Source date requirements we: Location and
elevation; •minion rate* of SOj. NOW and
parUculates; flue gal flow itto. extt velocity,
and exit temperature; flu* gas oxygen
content; properties ftnrfiniTim density,
PLUVUB 0 treats the chemistry of NO.
NO* 0*. OH. OJtD). SOa. HNO* aadHaSO*
IftpfnTTllilll Mr*ll* Iff UteM fflsT IMlCeVi IDA IDJf
the NCVNOt/O, reactions.
m. Pttyucal Jtanovof
Dry deposition of gaseous and paniculate
radius) of the amittad aeneols la the
10 MB) sin modee;
for 80s, NOu
t
ulationt mode a
deposition velodttea
ode aeroeol. tad
StabUitfda
iaddindtoBlfaraa
obserrer-baeed run), wind speed, lapse rate,
air temperature, relative humidity, and
mixuij height
Otharidan nquirsnMBts ait: Ambient
I (H NOb* MCht Oik
Bergstjom, R. W« Q Salgnaui, B. L,
Babsoa. K Y. Hobnaa andM. A. WofcOE,
19S1. Cosnparbon of the Observed and
Predicted VlaoalBinctt Caused D* Power
lit-— * BaW^^k^tA A44j
ituaTecnewaaiT, lasg. gtaiisii M
PIJUVUB Medal and the BET VMbtllt*
Modal Based on DM 197tVOTIA Date
wsmmtntmtmiHm IM mill •••htifg p9UUlHli* •
99 receptors tor averaging times of 1 to 24
hour*, and far a limited number of point
area, and line sources (99 of each type). This
algorithm ie not intended lor application to
entire urban anas but is intended, rather, to
assess the impact on air quality, on scales of
tens to hundreds of metais, of portions of
i such as shopping centers, large
_jas. and airpoila. Level terrain is
.The Gaussian point source
equation estimates mentations awn point
sourceeafter determining the effective height
of amlsslun and the upwind and crosswind
distance of the source fraa the ncept«.
Numerical integration of the Gaussian point
source equation is used to determine
l from the four types of Uoe
wunsM win. mdpoerti it dlffnnfldt
ibort ground), tpdyptcijl
>ouf ox. lntMpi>tton O9tt tha
_,_»-•-*, »_- _T. _ ^ __ — Jl_^. _**- _-.
source region, is done I.
UM sources perpendicular to the wind at
the receptor. The
tadonaanalytkaUy;
•^•^••aWji 4W ill nuaai • •••^^•^aW«lsW *-—
. HymBHaw ODBB BHIIIBBJijIiaUl/ *f7
I through the pbjma (tec
based nm with white, am* and black
viewtag backgrounds).
c. Output
Printed output indudas; Plums)
lUsearchTriangla Parfc. NC
WhMe, W. K..C aalmaur. a W. Hetaoid,
M.W.aajroth.UW.Udiatds,P.T.
P.&BbardwaKW.aCfmnarandW.B.
specified Uaea of sight
d. Type of Model
PLUVUBtsaGansslai
FourModesswitk
CDotroUadPew
l§:ltS-»laV
atiWahV
^^^ ^ The PAL-OS model can treat
ptfttcnltti frf^**"** IB **** plume •*•»*•
anvUarkmaVasttlmg and dry deposition of
tbepaxtidasareaxplkitlyaccountadfor.The
f_it_ it iiifftuiii.r ii»ni«iiii.».
•UUyuuHl BIBHeillll*lIBplimMIB •
listed In this report In the Usoiti
(PAL-M>
cucuiBtv
t Source fleceptor
PUJVUB treats a stafla point or
source. '
PAI
W. B. 1978. User's Guida tor
ttum. Algorithm fat
algorithms in the PAL
PAL-DS can be nsed if It can be
Point Aiaa, and Una Smortt BPA
Publication No, BPA-600/4-rB-OU. Offloeof
•^ttvuMt to DOM pcovioM by tlw ptnMfM
ii>odalfarae>siia|»pUcatlott, PAL-DS a»aet
PLUVUB asas Brlfp (1966.1971.1972)
Triangle Park. NC fffTO No. PB 211306}
Baa. K. & and H. P. aaodsnaa, 1962. PAL-
DS UodetThe PALModrttosilat •
Itsssaich andPtftlqpBfBt! twftwtfc -
T*tangla Park, NC-OTTB Ha PM»*11773»> tethaapi»UcarloBsnouUbe
-------
38S72 Federal Register / Vol. SB. No. 137 / Tuesday. July 20. 1993 / Rulea and Regulations
b. Input Requirement*
Source data: Point-sourcei emission rate,
physical stack height, Mack gas temperature,
stack gu velocity, rtick diameter, stack gas
volume flow, coordinate* of stack, initial oy
tod A; area source*—source strength, *ize of
•rat source, coordinate* of S.W. comer, and
height of am source; and line sources—'
source strength. Dumber of lues, height of
fouiee. coordinate* of end point*. Initial oy
and o*. width of line source, and width of
median. Diurnal variation* in emiationa an
pennitted. When applicable, the eettllng
velocity and deposition velocity are also
permitted. . • •
Meteorological data: Wind profile
exponent*, anemometer height, wind
direction and epeed. stability claw, mixing
height, air temperature, and hourly variation*
in emission rale.
c. Output
Mated output Includes:
Hourly concentration and deposition flux
for each aource type at each receptor; and->-•
Avenge concentration far up, to 24 an for
each aource type at each receptor.
d.Typeof Model
PA1/-DS i* a Gauuian plume model.
e. Pollutant Type*
PAL-OS may be used to model non-
reactive pollutant*.
ISouKe-ReetptorJMaOonthipt .
Up'toWsourceeofeechofCeounetypesi
Point, ana. and 4 type* of line sources.
Source and receptor coordinate* are '
uniquely defined.
Unique ttack height far each wurce.
Coordinate* of receptor location* are uaer
j—j^_j • ' •
Qennao.
& Plume Behavior . . •
Brigg* final phime ri*e equation* ere ueed.
Fumigation and downwa*h are not treated.
If jihtm* K*tgH« i ii i-11 il i "«HffB k^gM.
concentration* are anumed aquu to aero.
Surface concentration* are set to fan whan
the plume centeriine exceed* mixing height,
b. Horizontal Wind* .
User-supplied hourly wind data an used.
Constant, uniibnn (steady-state) wind la
a**umed within each hour. Wind Uaatumed
to incree*e with height
LVertta»/VWnd Speed*
AtfUI&M BQml lO ttKQ*
\.HoriioittalDitpeT*lon
Rural diipenioB coefficients from Turner
(1968) an used with no adfuatmenta made tar
SUE {see roughnen. . .
Six stability classes an used. . .:.
Dispersion coefficients (Pajo^43flnfd)
an assumed based on a3 c
height
k. Vertical DAperxton .
Six stability classes en used.
Rani dUperdan coeflident* from Turner
(1989) an used; no further ahntmenta an
nada ioc* vanatiOB IB eiirfaca rougBuea*.
tranaport or avenging ttaae.
Multiple leflectioDi* handled by
lummation of eerie* until the vertical
atandard-devietioa equals 1.6 times miking
height. Uniform vertical mixing is assumed
thenafter.
L Chemical Trmufomatim
Nottreated.
m. Phytical Removal *'
PAL-DS can treat deposition of both
gaseous and suspended paniculate* In the
plume since gravitational settling end dry
deposition of the particles an explicitly
accounted fcr.
.n. Evaluation Studies .
BM KaBdeavWalkAdveedaaand
Mapanlaai Medal QtADM)
ReftrtncM
Aurtfa. D. L. A. W. Bealer. and W. R.
Coodin. 1M1. RandomWalk Advactton and
Oi*penion Modal (RADM). Ucar'a Manual
Dame* k Moon. Lot AngaVn, CA.
Runchal. A. K.. W. RGoodln. A. W.
Bealer. D. L Austin. 1981. Technical
Detcrlption of the Random-Walk Advectkm
and Diapenlon Model (RADM). Dames *
Moon. Los AngelM.CA. - , , .
A
the
$440-00 from: Mr. C James Olsten. Dame
Moore. 449 South Pigueroa Street. Suite
3900, Los Angeles. CA 90071-1669.
Abttnct •• v
RAIN* U a lagnnglan dispersion model
which uses therandomwalk method to
'simulate alittuspheffic dispsrsion. Tao .
technical proceoun mvortes tracking tracer
perttdee having • given mesa through
aulaMMktf^CjMM Itew **-— ^L^__ 1 a » jslk.. , f, *~- .
•OVKDOO ojr upi nm0 wim «na wnunon ny
tie -
invm i i • ••• ^ ^HBBB • m^ *«PW«I» •••••JJ••• «• iwr
^^^^^^j. *^ |
-------
tegfatnr / VoL M; No. 137 / Tnatday. July TO. 19O3 ARuhs and R»griatk»r» 3M73
I
P|ll_U.,lll«M k^J^^_—» IM^U^^M A^ A ^MtllM^fiAM*
rvnuiion. Nsnonni i&eimni joS'/ippJiEsnonsv.
of Chemical Research, itertoi pp. 137-142.-
Goodin>W.R,.A.K.RunchBlaiidG.Y. •
Lou. 1960. Evaluation and Application of the
Random-Walk Advection and DteperslOB
Model IRAPig. Sympo^him on Intermediate
Rangft Atmo*pbiiric i^ntpoit PIRDCMVM rad
Technology Assessment DOB/NOAA/ORNU
Catlinburg.TN. /
Coodln. W. R.. D. 1. Austin and A. ft
Runchal. I960. A Model Verification and
Prediction Study of SOa/SCv Concentrations
in the San Francisco Bay Ana. Second Joint •
Conference on Applications of Air Pollution
Meteorology. AMS/APCA. New Orleans, LA.
or user specified dow«wia4
Reactive plume nodal
*. Pollutant Typm
Currently, using the Carbon Bond
Mechanism (CBM-B), 35 species an
simulated (68 reactions), including NO. NQt.
O].SOa.SO«*, five categories of reactive
hydrocarbons, secondary nitrogen
compounds, organic aerosols, and radical
I Sourct-Aeeeptor JtafeffowMp*
Single point source.
Single ana or volume source.
D. Stewart M. Yocka. and M-K Uu. 1881.
Reactive Piuma Model— RPKMI, User's
Guide, EPA Publication No. BPA-600/9~«1-
021. U.S. environmental Protection Agency.
ESRURaseajt* Triangle Park. NCfNTIS No.
PB 82-230723)
user specified time increment or at user
specified downwind dlttsnrtt
Briggs (1971) plume rise equations are
The above report Is available from NTIS
(S16.9S tor paper copy. $8.95 on microfiche).
The accession number Cor the computer tap*
far RPM-a to PB83-1S4M6. and the ooat to
$460.00. Requeet* thottld be aent toe
Computer Products. National Technical
Information Service. 1X& Department of
b, Hottemtal What*
User spedfies wind speeds as a function of
rce. Springfield. VA 22161. Phone:
{703)4*7-4650.
Abtttoct
The Reactive Plume Model. RPM-0. to a
computerised nu?^Tl used for estimating
short-term concentrations of primary and
secondary pollutants resulting from polntA
nissto
The model Is capable
IntsnctioD of
of
pnxme dispersion
photochemistry. Two mam features of the
model are: (1) The horixontal leeohittoa
within the plume, which otfors a more
realistte treatment of the entralnment
process, and (2) Its fludbillty with regard to
L Vstticat WmrfSpeerf
Not treated.
| torfe^Dfeporno*
User specified ptume widths, or M
specify stability and widths will be
computed using Turner (1969).
k. VsrOeo/M»pe*«fOii
User specified plume depths, or user may
specify sVaoiUty in which case depths wUl be
calculated using Turner (I960). NototBtt
vnticfti iifiifDCinity l& phi'n^
QinefUlyHtorunusu^ttecbeeuetryollhe
There to no ipedflc reoommeadaboB at the
present time. The RPM-U Model Buy be used
ICiltus,as)dHogo.l980).TheCBiMLas
lncorpoatadutheBPM-a.contams3S
specUeaadMiMctiowfocttsmcprimerllv
oohydiocarboo-nitrogent "
b. Aipuf R«ouirNnents
spsciss of polhrtant emitted: amhlea*
pressure, ambient Isttpsratufe, stack height
stack diameter, stack exit velocity, stack gas
, and location.
m. Mysico/JlMnovaf
Not treated
StuiUtt
Wind
speeds. plu
- . . .
Development and Application of • Reactive
Plume MndeL
'
Applications, toe.. Wl Lucas Valley Road. .
San Raphael. CA 94901.
Abstract
The Regional Transport Model (RTM-HI is
a computer based air quality grid mode!
whose primary use is estimating the
distribution of air pollution from multiple
point sources and area sources at large
distances (on the scale of several hundred to
a thousand kilometers). RTM-H offers
significant advantage* over other long-range
transport modal* because it is a ouasi-lbrat
-1 hybrid (griH pi... ljp.agt.tt
to the solution of the
ectiondif&ision equation. Furthermore. Its
2377-tMS.
I or stability
ptordatar
are: Downwind
distances or travel times at which
calculations are to be made.
Initial concentration of all spade* to
ambient concentrations to be entrained by
the plume to optional.
c-Oufput ,_ ' -
Shott-tenn concentrations of primary and
secondary pollutants at either user specified
Morris. R. &. a A. Stewart andM-KUu.-
Transport ModeJ-Verslo* 0. Publicattosilwa.
SYSAPP-13/022. SystssBS. ApoUcatioM be..
SanlabsiCA.
Tbecompulst code to availableoa. ._.,..
'c tip* tor a cost of $100 (trUcfc
I theUsar-s Manual) from: Svetnias
and temporally varying wind, mixing depths,
dlfiusivtty, and transformation ate fields, it
to also capable of treating spatially varying
modeling concept Is capable of predicting
concentration distributions of many pollutant
species (e.f,. NOx. CO. TSP, etc.), lie most
notable applications of the model to date
focus on the long-range transport and
transformation of SOa and sulnUM.
o spec
. Toe
dation at the
present time. Toe RTM Model may be used
on a case-by-caae basis.
Souice data requirements ar* Matar potat
source SOi and primary snlfite emissions,
Incrodtng stack height, diameter, earft
velocity, exit temperature, and hourly
emission factors; area source SOj and
primary SO*« emissions in gridded format
> * . . --•- -.--•
Stewact D- A. and KMCIJu. 19«.
nd Application of • Re
Atmospheric Environment t»
Criddedu.vwtod fields at user tpedfied
update interval (modal configuced far
separate wind fields la each of two layers),
derived from twice daily radiosonde data.
time variation linear between a maximum
convecUvely driven boundary layer tod •
mmimum mechanically driven boundary
layer, spatial Interpolation by an inverse
distance weighted obtoctlve scheme; gridded
hourly predpttatlon fields determined either
by averaging nreclpltation rate of all stations
hi grid (If bid) density), or by inverse
distance we^hted Interpolation (if low .
density).
Other data requirements are; Parameter
flle. containing ngtne. definition, starting
time, mitprt and averaging time intervals.
regta top specifications, and various
operational Sagst hoiiioBlsJ diffuslvfty fleWs
calculated from wind fields: land use type
fttot deposUkio velocities and roughness
length dttsoitaad Internally from tabulated
values associated with tend use types; initial
conditions and boundary conditions for both
layers (boundary conditions may be time
varying*.
Prin
i SO] and sulfate
concentration fields for lower and upper.
layers at pre specified time iatnrrals. _
fields far «pp«r asjA towsr kyec. over pee-
specified time intervals. Accumulated dry
-------
38874 Fwbnl KagJtta* / VoL 58. No. 137 / Tuesday. July 20. 1893 / Rukt and RegitlattoBS
and'wet deposition for each specie* over pre-
selected time intervals. .
RTM-a is a hybrid Eukrian grid and
Legraogian puff model
Stewart D. A.. R. B. Munis. M4C Uu. and
D. Henderson. 1983. Evaluation of an
Episodic Regional l>aiiipatt Model tee
Itooiptof oitof
•rat
RTM-B i* configured for SQz end sulfste
only. Primary suttria emissions may Iw
Included.
CSMreeJtsojpnrJIefatiaiisMpf
Ana MUICM and minor point MMIKM <
•pacified at i
Up to 500 major point sources (modeled
with the Gaussian puff submodel) an
allowed.
Grid avenge concentration and deposition
totals an provided at each grid within the
modeling donate (diy deposition far tower
layer grid only). All lower grid average
coM»tretion values en assumed to be
repnsenlailve of giuund-ievel ncepton*
g. Hiuae So/wrier
Plume rise (Brigp, ion) is calculated for
•11 mafar pout sources regardless of whether
they an treated in the Gaussian puff
iDeyBpi*ode.Atm(MpAeric
fiiwiroiunent 17: 122S-12S2.
BJ4 SBOKTZ
BJorklund. J. R.. and J. P. Bowers. 1MB.
Dear's Instructions for the SHOHTZ and
LONGZ Computer Programs, Vohnnes I and
E EPA Publication No. EPA-003/«-U-004a
end b. US. EnviroanienUl Protection
Agency. Region m. Philadelphia. PA.
This model is available as part of
UNAMAP (Version 8). Tba computer code to
available on magnetic tape from: r
Pwitxi output ittCRidftK Total
specified source groups, including the
combined emissions from all sources (with
optional allowance for depletion by
deposition).
d.rj7»o/MMW
SHORTZ to a Gaussian phane model
e.PoJhitoar Types
SHORTZ may be used to model primerv
pollutants. Settling and deposition of
perticulates an tneted.
i Source-fleeeptar Aefatkutc/i/ps
Uons far sources and
Receptors an assumed to be at ground
SDringfield.
b. Horizontal Win* ....
Griddedu.T wind fields en used at a user
specified update interval for each layer.
Gaussian puff submodel tricks puff
centrotdshoriiontaUy at user specified time
interval*.
L Vertical IMMSpMrf
Considend implicitly if convergent or
divergent winds are provided.
VA 22101. Phone: (703) 487-
SHCTTZutillm the steady state Mvariate
and rural areas in flat or complex terrain to
calculate aroinKHevel amWeitair
calctUattl-bow.!*
due
buildk
sources far up to 300
concentration at eacn nceptor due to
•mm tvf wnv^H- limlmthiii -jit
option ittrgiavllalimial eetutegis tovokedf
analysis cannot be accomplished
vtanM dispenion is based en o>
dia»rentialso«rw»d front a power law fit ta
Turner (1069) dispenio. «J,M.Varlabie
strirfUUeswithta adfeoent cells an
Horisontel eddy dlfmsMllee an
proponiUmaltothewiiidSekldefcnnation
and ere calculated from the grtdded wind
fields at aodUiary Input Maximum and
minimum constraints an imposed on the
magnitude of the dUraBMttaa.
k.
SHOETZ can be used, tt It can be
M >li •
UM
model feragiven application.
be axacntad to the equivalent
SHORTZcanbausedoBacaM^case
besls m lleo of a prehrred modal if it can be
, tillsM tfaal CHt^TJil JD
g. P/ume Behavior
Plume rise equations of B}orUund and
Bowan (1082) en used.
Stack tip downwash (Bjorkhmd and
Bower*. 1982) to mcradedT
Mphmie* move horinoatally and will
Aiftr Iniemapl ele»aied leiielii
Plunies above nlxjfli neu&t an w^^rfli
VU*b«* ^feJl^j^lA^ •* ^|.,f- _ L~J_LA t^
leiwu nuecnon at miying neujnt is
••••MBk^Ml t*^ *&***m^^ l^lj^l^ ••M ^fe«A«t^l^ fc • I »fci
•f niiiini ipr pnimvs iwowineiuiuflgoatgDi*
Plume ries is limited when the mean wind
at stick height approacba* or exceeds stack
«dt Telocity.
PfKaVCt nflatCDOO it BOUIM 1*1 4MUnMv fOl
IKrihjtantswithnosett&ii|veV>ctty.
Zero nflectton at ground to assumed for
polhttants with finite settling velocity.
TUtedphtmeisujedtepoliutantswith
eettllng velocity spedfled. Buoyancy-induced
dispenion (Briggs. 1972) to inchtded.
i
Plume dispenion is based OB e>
differentials derived from a power law fit IB
Turner (1089) dispersion curve*. Variable
stabilities within adfacent cell* an
comtHeied.
Vertical dispersion across the mixed layer-
sufee layer interface is oonaidend when
rataihrmg pollutant depositio
LO*micaiT)nivfonnatton
Linear SO2 oxidation is mated. Rate
constant Is diumaily and latttudinally
variable. A minimum oxidation nta
Is specified to account
. oxidation during the nighttime.
•a* MaaaaiaVajaJ •* •
ID. t II/ULtV fNBDOWf
• Dry deposition of SOi and suibte I*
treated. Precipitation scavengmg of SO
(reversible) and suite* (irreversible) to
specific application, m this can the
options/modes which an most appropriate
for the application should be usadT
kftmtrtfleonfreatents
Sauna data nmibemenls an: For point.
building or ana source*, location, elevation.
»rate (optionally classified by
settling velocity) aad decay
tcksouroM.*tackbeigb. .
(tack ndte**(hmer). ectuel vohiaetrlc flow
ran. and ground elevation (optional); for
building emmet, height, length aad width.
and orientation: far ana i
Wind speed profile
mncUou of both stability class and wind
speed. Detnilt values en specified in
Bforidud and Bower* (1982).
L Vertical WlmlSp*d
Verocal wifid* an
i «•—*—^_»»>.. *
j. nontoatanatptntoa
HorijuBital pniiiia ataa la derived som
fa»g^.B§ lat^^Al •••^MBB^nA kftl^l^lAlM^^ ..—|^
mpui lamni wrpuienT inrensinee usmg
adjustments to phone height and nta of
plume growth with downwind distance
specified to BJorUund and Bowan (1082),
k, Vertfca/Oipenton
Vertical plume sise is <
vertical 1
width and
Wind speed and
| rjfr flf
plume growth with downwind distance
specified to Biorklund and Bowan (1082).
LCnemfcxt/nonr/teBMltaa
i of vertical end horisontel wind
dtaecUon*. (ie.. vertical and lateral turbulent
j bright, ate tempentam,
exponential decay. Time constant to input by
Settliittjanddeporitianofpaiticulalesare
-------
90> No.^137 / TttMday. July 2O. .199* f Rule* and Regulations 38879
Itorklund. J. 8.. andJ. F. Bowers,«62.
User's Instructions IDT the SHORTZ «nd
U)NGZ Computer Piagnmt. EPA
PublicsttonNo. BPA-003/&-B20M. BPA
Environmental Protection Agency, Region HI.
Philadelphia. FA. '•••--•
Wackier. D.. end R. Londergen, 1984.
Evaluation of Complex Terrain Air Quality
Simulation Models. EPA Publication No,
EPA-«30/+-«4-Ot7. DA Environmental
Protection Agancy. Research Triangle Park,
NC
BX3S Sliu>bLnM-So«rceMedel(GMUNZ)
GMUNB i»a
plume model
CMLINE cam be used to model primary
pollutants. Settling and deposition are dot
treated.
t SouTce-ttoceptbr Relationship
CMUNEtieatt arbitrary location of line ^
foufoot met ncvptoiie
Plu
line source is used.
ise formula adequate fora heated
Chock, D. P., 1MO User's Guide for the
Simple Line-Source Model for Vehicle
Exhaust Dispersion Near a Road.
Environmental Science Department General
i Laboratories. 1
GMUNE
ser-supplied hourly (or
Motors Research I
.Warren. ML
Availability
Copies oftbe above reference ar» available
without charge torn Dr. D. P. Cbock._
Environmental SciB&Ce Departmeoft,
i LahmfeHb*. Gem
ourly (
half-hourly) ambient wind speed and
direction. The wind measurements are from
a height of 5 to 10m.
L Vatieal Wiad Speed
Vertical wind speed is assumed equal to
Horizontal dispersion parameter is not
Motors Research!
Motors Technical Orator. Warren, MI 48090.
The User** Guide (xmtainstiie ihott
algorithm of the model
Abstract
GMLINBif a timple ttatdy-rtate Gniniin
plume model whkfa cut be u»ad to
detemine hourly (or hitfJnarljr) avengei of
iwimmlOOmf
A vertical dispersion parameter is used
which is* function of stability and wind-
road angle. Three stability classes are used:
unstable, neutral and stable. The parameten
take Into account the eflsct oftrafflo
genenied turbulenoe (Chock, I960).
t
for plume riw due to me
heeted exhaust, which cm be important
whea me antROMi wud to TBT low. It alap
utilia* a new wt of vertical dUperrion
parameten which nflects the infl^t*"i?f of
tratDc-iaducedturbuIenoe.
Not treated.
L PnysJow Itaoiofui
Nottnated.
GMlPfficanbeueedtfU
equivalent
model far « ____ „ ___
be executed m the eqnhrahst mode.
QaUNBcanbeueadopacaeeby raie
nodeltfttcnl
Chock, a P.. 1978. A Simple Line-Source
Model for Dispsrskn Near Roadways.
/UnMwnAerJc arrirotiment 12: U3-BM.
SistiaTG.. P. 8ameon.M. Keaaaa. and & T.
Has, 19TB. A Study of Pollutant Dispersion
Near Highway.. Amwepfterfc OnftMUMnt
13:889-685.
exas CBs»rtrin|iril Meilal (TCM-D
btsitiBUmiofai
denxmttrated. u*bg the criteria la J
3.2, mat CMLINEii mom appropriate for the
tpedflc applicttioo. In uii cue the model
optioBB/nodM which arei
farthetppHcationihouMbei
b. Input
Some* data
nte per unit lentil
ianM co eecu voMt
oeoten to the receptor.
Staff of the Texas An- Control Board. 19aa
User's Guide to the TEXAS
CUMATOUXaCAL MOOBLdCM). Texas
Air Control Board. Permits Section. 6330
Highway 290 East, Austin. TX
AvaOabitilf
tad receptor
I ^^AA BK^HklBa^KA^^M ^^m»
i oaia raouiiejiMuiB an:
Buoyancy Bux. ammnt Kability condition,
ambient wind and its direction relative to toe
road.
Receptor data requirements are: Distance
and height abore ground.
Printed output tedudest ttantrior (hal»
hourly] BinnBirtritimif ct tnviMaploc 0M lo .
Texas Air Control Bond at the following
cost . -
User's Manual only 82OOO
User's Manual and Model (Magnetic Tape)—
. S6000
. Requests should be directed to: Data
FncessugDMston.Texas Air Control
Board; 6330 Highway 290 Bast. Austin. TX
76733. ' ••
AOSDQCK •
TCM to a cUmatoiogfcal steady-state
TCM can be used if it can be demonsti«t*d
to estimate concentrations equivalent to
those provided by the preferred model fora
given application. TCM must be executed In
the equivalent mode.
TCM can be used on a case-by-case basis
in lieu of a preferred model if it can be
demonstrated, using the criteria in section
3.2. that TCM is more appropriate for the
specific application. In. ft>f« qy» the model
for the application should be
Source data requirement* are: Point source
coordinates emission rates (by pollutant).
stack; height, stack diameter, stack gas exit
velocity, stack gas temperature; area source
coordinates (southwest comer), site.
emission rate.
Meteorological data requirements are:
Stability wind rase and average temperature.
Receptor data requirements are: Size and
spacing of the rectangular nceptor grid.
c. Output
Printed output includes:
Period average concentrations listed,
displayed in map format or punched on
cards at the user's option.
Culpability list option provides the
contributions of the five highest contributors
at each receptor.
•cenario(run).
TCM Is a Gaussian plume model
e.Pol/uttm« Tvpes
TCM may be used to model primary
^ Settling •fM^ deposition are not
Aibitovy tonal Im of point sources and area
sources ait tiMled.
Acbiliaiy locanflp and spacing of
rectangular grid of receptors are used. (Area
source grid is best defined in terms of the
receptor grid, so that the receptors fall to the
center of the area source).
Receptors located in simple terrain may be
t> Plume BB&avJar
Betas (1978> plume rise equations.
turfiJJtM mffMufcim H««, •*• ta»A lor pnint
Two-thirds power law to used when
I riee option to selected. Flares are
h-Norisonta/Wbidt
Characteristic wind speed is calculated for
each dbectioo-etabiUty class combination.
This characteristic speed is the inverse of
the average toverse speed for the subillty-
wind dlradaon coBkUBation.
Wind speed is adjusted to stock height by
• power law using exponents of 0.10. 0.15,
OJO.03S.OJO.aad 030 far stabilities A
roads by miiiiutog the resuha ftom-repeated
model *•-----* * • •' : • '
pollutBtia.
Vertical wind speed is assumed to be tenx
-------
38876 Ffldoral
/ VoL 58. No. 137 / Tuesday. July 20. 1903 / Rules and Rogu!
Uniform distributio
ithin
chits
tor tb» applicatkn tbonid KM
degree sector is I
k Vertical Dispersion
* Dispersion parameter* fac point source* an
fit to Turner (1969): for am sources in the
urban mode the At is to Gifted and Hanna
i and heights of
Seven stability classes an wed. •
FuquiU A through F m treated, with
daytime "D" and nighttime "D" given
la tht urban mode. E and F stability classes
an treated « D-night Perfect nflactioa at the
ground te assumed.
L CftemJcaf nxTOrfrnwrtfofl
Chemical nwu&mutionf entreated using
exponential decay. Half-lib to Input by the
emissions for both point and area sources;
stack gas temperature, stack gas exit velocity.
and stock Inside diameter far point source*
fofpluma rise calculations. ...
Meteorological data requirement* are:'
Hourly surface weather data from the EPA
m. Phytical Removal
Poyskjal nmovu is trMleo wins?
exponential decay. Half-life is input byte
IhwpraoMMBT output tncniMai hautiy stioility
das*, wind direction, wind speed.
temperature, and mixing height Any
«. » .. mf g, ,i,,,-l— •.•lmjiMi...i».ii»l JJ-..JL
flnrninnaiifiMt or niiiiny i™iiaoroiogii,ai oaxa
up to 24 noun may be used, (e^., 1.3, S, 8,
24 hours).
rfOQuinmont* an* Siaa, epacing
mofndanguli
k. Vartica/ Dupartiaa
Dispersion parameten tat point i
fit to Tinner («•»): fcr ana samces. in the
uiban mode, the it is to GUCord and Hanna
(1970).
Total reflection of the phune at the ground
is assumed.
to the urban mode. B and F rtability classes
are treated as D^ightttine.
LChmnJca/Trant/annation
Chemical tnosfonnaticm Is treated using
exponential decay. Half-life Is input by tin
Physical removal it tnttod using
exponential decay. Half-life to input by the
Printed
list:
n. Evaluation Studies
Londergan.R.J..D.KMino(t.D.].
Wachterand R. R. RB. 1983. B**JoatbM of
UrtMB Air Quality Simulation Model*. EPA
Publication No. EPA-450/4-83-020.0.S.
Triangle PBTk.NC
Dumnberger, C. &, B. A. Braberg, and K.
Protocol to be Used far Dimersion Model
Comparison Studies. Presented at the 76tli >
Annual Meeting of the Air PaUutfoa Control
Association. Atlanta. GA.
BJ7 Texas Epie
SprtiaU ttnjr (coiiOBiitirtli'jiii olipuyM
onasaqt): ^ ___
PUDCuM OttOS OI tM OOdCMtlaltiflP UstS
Culpt^lity list (jxrrtat lamlhlMitioMj of
Uj> tbn MsjMit cootiipuloi to MCD ncsptofj
Polut soum list*
d.1>p»e/MbdW
TBM is • Gaussian plume model
n-EVa/uot/onSteoVes
Londergan. R, D. Minott. D. Wachter. T.
Kinctid andD. Bonitata. 1989. Evahwtton of
Rural Air Quality Simulation Model*. EPA-
450/4-83-O03. EnviMBmental Protection
t RssMfCn Jiims^et Ffenc* Nd
iC*|t« B* A* BfOOSI&SJBa 1C
Protocol to be Used fcr Dispersian Model
Comparison Studie*. Presented at the nth
Annual Meeting of the Air Pollution Control
Association. Atlanta. CA.
AVACTAU
TEM GUI be used to model nooetcti**
Zannetti. R. G. Catbant and R. LewU,
1089. AVACTA U User's Guide (Release 3).
Aero^ioniiieitt.b&. Technical Report AV-
OM-45/520.
Jfo/VfVJVGaf
Staff of the Texas Ah- Control Board. 1979.
User's Guide to the TEXAS EPISODIC
MODEL Texas Air Control Board. Permit!
Section. 6330 Highway 390 East. Austin. TX
L Senm Receptor flulnffcinihfr
Aifrltriiy IftCTttiff* ™ i
•••IIBI eMWfeW^aal aMeA taa^BtiiMl
Arbtbarykica^aa&ipacugof
_
A magnetic tape copy of the FORTRAN
coding and the user's guide an available at
a cost of C JOB taop-proflt organlratton) or
$3^00 (other crganintlons) from;
AeroViionmert. me . MS Myrtto AMBue.
Monrovia. CA W016. PboBK (818) 3S7-MS3.
The TEM-B model i» available borntha
Texas Air Control Board at the faUowmt
Rsctiplon locsjtid to sliB^w tsnsJft Sfls^ bat
User1* Manual only-«aOO
User's Manual and Modal (Magnetic Tape)-
S80.00
Requests should be directed to: Data
Processing Division. Texas AlrControl
Board. 6330 Highway 290 Bart. Austin. TX
78723.
g.PAunaB*ftavi(r
Brigy (l»7al I [dime rise equations are
TranriUonalrlsa is calculated.
Tha AVACTA B modal la a
m ms.rk4.f4a • a .iil|_.ijLtji Atenm^^
i ^aTBiGn wiiiuii.iiii ic oispm
en described by tbeevohitkio of
. Tin
modal can be applied te tbortUm (a;«.. ona
day) slmiilationt In both transport and calm
%Vind
spMdv
T SMf •
ftdfuststi to rvIctM
TBM i* a short-term, steady Hate
plume modal fcr detnrmining shnrt-tem
concentration* of non-naetiv*- poUutanta.
aiQ. &18. aapra*td*dbytl.«pi**irred
model far agtvaaapplica.i..n. AVACTA H
must be executed IQ the equivalent mode.
-------
/• Vot -Sty.-N6i-iay* f Tuesday. July 20. 19M ARnht »Bd Ragitiatio&a 38B77
t
. AVACTAllcaabeusedonacasebycas*-
l»sislnUeuofapi«ftmdinodellfttcanb»
damonstratad. tl**l*B thie critaria u section
3.2, that AVACTA D is more appropriate for
the specific application. In this case the
model options/modes which an most
appropriate tor the application should he
b. Input Retpiimaentf (all time-rarying)
A time-varying input Is required at tech
ires oata requirements are: uoorawi
..•••••jifln rates of primary and secondary
pollutants, initial plume sigmas (for non-
point sources), exit tsmptratuit. txtt '
velocity, stack inside diameter.
Meteorological data requirements art:
Surface wind measurements, wind profile* (if
available), atmospheric stability profiles,
Receptor date recjulrtmtnts art: Receptor
Other date requirements: Coordinate* of
the computational gh"***^, grid call
specification, terrain elevations, user's
computational and printing options.
c. Output
The model's
to user's printing flagi
244
'soutpoutispi
ting dags. Hou
ided according
riy, 3-hour and
„ and highest-
atoond-higntst concentration value*. Both
partial and total concentrations in provided.
A. Type of Model
AVACTA D Is Gaussian segment/puff
model* .
a. Pollutant Types
AVACTA 0 can handle any couple of
The AVACTA U approach maintains tht
mulation,
basic Gaussian fo
numerical simulation of
•nil
but allows a
m nonstattonary
conditions. The emitted pollutant material Is
divided into a sequence of ''aitmtrnV'tithtr
together but whose dynamics art a ninction
of tht weal meteorological conditions. Sinn
tht meiaorotogical panmttsn vary with tiint
^.
thedfifa
gto
encountered along its tacatoctory.
AVACTA fl calculataatbe patttoJ
during each interval Tht partial
CQaMilPsTittoO B tMSUBw wVOO
of all txisting puffs, plot mat of tht dostst
The mar can (elect the following plum*
rise fbrmiiltt:
Brigg* (1969. 1971. 1972)
CONCAWB (Briggs. 1975)
Luca^Moore (Brigg*. 1975)
UMT'S function, te.. • wbnwtin* tupplled by
the user
With cold phmee. tht
•pedal toutine far the
plume rite. Tb> uterc
—. 1 opoflii< nnt cuirtBjl phifps
betarteinoomptetei^
part fail Hiflixrttott*.
•V tTnmimnntfmi ttUVsmjJW
O* JwIBwflltV VvIfffOsT
X 3D mass-consistent wind field i»-
optionally generated.
LVertfco/Wad Speed
A 3D mass-consistent wind field la ^
optionally generated.
J.Hortwato/Kfpersidn
During etch step, the sigmas of each
element an Increased. Tht user can select
tht following sigma functions:
PasmiilKfiftard-Turner (in the functional
form specified by Green etai, 1980)
Brookhavm (Gifford. 1975)
Briggs, open country (Gifibrd. 1975)
Briggs, urban. La.. McBloryPooler. (Gifford.
1975)
twin (1979)
LO-LOCAT (MacCraady tt aL. 1974)
Ustr-epecifltd ninction, by points
User-specified function, with a user1*
•uhroutint
The virtual distance/age concept Is used
tar incrementing tht sigmas at each time
step.
k. Vertical JMtptnfon
During each step, the sigmas of each
element an increased. Tht user can select
tht tallowing slgma functions:
Pasqulll-Glflbrd'Turaar (is th>
fanntpedfledbyCrwn»ttL,l«80)
Braokhmn (GUtort, 1975)
Brian open country (Gifted. 1975)
Brt»f. wiMn. L*.. MeBboyPooler. (GUteri.
1975)
UMJOCAT (MMOMdy t* tJL 19744
UMMpedotd function, wttt • uMft
tuhrouUM
The vbtral dMuce/^ecancspt to a*ed
(prta«y-te-
Flirt arier chemical i
BL Phyiicai flemovaf
Pint ofwr diy snd wet oepoiitjflc
a. AVo/tutfJofl Studies
Zannetti P., G. Ceitenl and A. Gwtanl.
1985. AVACTA D Modal Simulations of
Wont-Gtss Air Pollution Scnariotm
Northern Italy. 15m International Technical
Meeting on Air Pollution Modeling and Its
Application. St Louis. Missouri. April 15-
19.
PH Assodatot. 1998. User's Guide to
-SDM-A Shoreline Dispmbn Modal BPA
Publication No. PA-450/4-M-017.
Centaf for RMilttofy Air Models BullMin
BovdSystem (M« pt«e B-l).
Ahftnct
SUM is • hybrid multlpo.nt SauuUn
dispetslon model that cucuiitra toutc*
impact for thow noun during the yen when
fumigation evenb in expected using a v
•pedal fumigation tlgorithm and the MPTER
nguUtmy model for the rmmlnlng hour* (*ee
Appendix A).
•. Ricommendatioru for Regulatory C/M
SDMmtybeutedonacatv-by-caiebtiit
far the fallowing applications:
• Tall ttatlonary point Muroet located at a
thoreliae of any urge body of water,
• Rural or urban areai;
• Flat terrain;
• Tnniport distance* to* than 50 bn;
• 1-hour to 1-year averaging tlmat.
b. Input Requinntwts
Source data: Location, •minioa rate.
physical stack height, ttack gw exit velocity.
stack inside diameter, stack gai temperature
and shoreline flflfliiilniitftti
Meteorological data: Hourly value* of mean
wind tpaad within the Thermal Internal
Boundary Layer (TOD and at stack height;
nuan potential tavnperature over land and
ovac watan ovar water lapse rate; and surface
sensible heat flux. In addition to these
meteorological data. SDM access Kandard
NWS *uitice and upper air meteorological
data through the RAMMBT preprocessor.
Receptor data: coordinate* for each
receptor,
ti. Output
Printed output include* the MPTER model
output a* well as: special shoreline
at the jet
lelect «e
-------
38878 Federal
/ VoL 88. No. 187 / Ttaeaday. July 20, 1993 / Rule* end RagoJatfcnn
. For Out ftimigstton algorithm cosf&cients
bated on Mitre (1980) and Mlsia and-
McMillan (1980} an used far ptumi transport
testable air above T1BL and baaed on Lamb
(1078) far transport in the unstable afar below
the TBL. An efiecttve hcdsonlal dispersion
coefficient biMd OB Mian ad Onlock(lM2)
is used. Far nocritimtoatiea periods.
lintheMPTEKinodel
an used (see Appendix A).
k. Vsrtfco/rtoparston
For the fumigation algorithm, coefficients
baaed on Misra (1080) and Mian and
McMillan (1980) an used.
1. Chemical ^huu/umwUuii
the fumlgsita algorithm.
m-Wijufcn/Jtemmi/
Physical removal to not explicitly Mated.
n. Anfaatfaa SauUe*
nuTUuiiimmtal Ptotecttoo AnncTi 1987.
Aoalyti* and Bvaluatian of Statiittcal Coastal
FVm%iitt«i Mpdab. BPA PnhHfiUfln N^
EPA-4SO/4-B7-002.UA Bavtaamntal
ProtecltoB Agency. Ifaaiarth Wangle Pait.
NC (NTIS FB 87-175519) ^^
below. -
VarfabtoitaxmiumMVah*
Hortontal cell dimension 250 to 800 meters
Vertical layers 3 to S
l^frpth SO to 100 Barters . ^
ZtfpfhaftgnHiiid **"iiH bt nMtd f?Htrn***y
Lateral meander velocity default
Diftustvlties default
Ventilation parameter (upper default
|nji • jliiaai j^Mi J11 ill«i \
Dry dgpoiltjop ^alocity i
— ' • 'tf'll •iMTliitl
ttttd pRMMUllfpHI {W 4XCWMU&C8
i tof buoynt
placed Dytbeoeerin a
nflects the expected
during stagnation mnditjons
layers era available to ne near.
!• ••--•—- -• • •••» •-
II* JWUHMIBPI •rHMeV
During each time step in the modal, the
winds an assumed to be uninnn throughout
minunlaadmtbeao^vectianalgprithnLTo
account far teminefiects on winds and
dispenwB. an ad hoc abjorithm la employed
in the model to distribute i
locations, and emission rates, may be i
intsncttvety.oi ' -
files from a pm
data, Including wind speeds, wind
directions, rainntes'
deposition calo
Winds an
1»Al*ht
neigin.
tobtooaiftiatwlth
(optionally, far wet
as), and Urns of day and
•• Vow^A ^BBM! eseeek
«n auuj mmi n
data file.
HaRteon.Halsteed.ia02.-A User's Guide
toWYNDvalley3.ll.anBuleriaiHGridAlr»
~ rDtspmion Model win Versatile
Souices. and Winds." WYNDepft
me.. Mereer Island. WA.
Availability
C^ieecf me usert guide and the
rates may be
dally, weekly, and/or
c. Output • . .
Output Aon WtHDvaBsy
.•^n:-
Horixontal eddy dlflusfonooefflcients may
be entered explicitly by the user at every time
be |"»**M*I *« ••MiiiaAa *^f^ ^^fn^*nff BOB
mewB^vetoctttesandtbeir
k. Vertfaaf Otnienta
Verttcaleddy
landa
OOBOlDflB flMJF Dal
by the user at every ttne
availabte at « cost of
WY
..
SE.. Mercer bland. WAftB04
232-1819.
.PhODe: (206)
Aiwfmet
WYNDvaltey 3.11 to a muttMeyer tap to
^tan vertical layers) Ihihriea pM dlspetitoa
— „ ,1 -f A -a ^^^^*-^ ^^^^ ^ __ .••••- •*
BKNMI oin p8jnBnt onn nniiiuttTtn
borders around tte anas tobe
_
borders, the totmsirlai and tocattani of
dtflusMttssthataffeftttediiparcnaof
rptotsofpoUutaBt
tfarthahighaetWefepieodas
(during anysingle time step), the higbeetand
•atWWuLhiaVVaAvBrf ^al hjMM" aiBBBiiB^BB>> awnAfl m
dry and wet depoeitiaet fluxes, end a i
I
WYNDsaDeytoathne
BulariangrldmodeL
WYNDvalley may be used to model any
inert pollutanL
ipedfied receptor ait
iateenceof
will be
at
and statistical
matstandards
at thoee sttea. WYNDvalley
tdatamput
sjnfl ooioc yejioics oHiplay.
WYKDvaUeynaybeusedoBac
.valley stagnation periods of 24 boon or"
Harri«aa,li.G.Pade,CI
Wibom, 199QL Air QaalilyltelBS
Stagnattas: ACoeaparJeon of RAM ae4
P illij llliHI llt'T miiilnl
Five SMae. Journal e/tfce Air* Me*
Mmaasmejtf Assodation. 40:47-92.
Yoshlde. C, 1990. A Camparieon of
WYNDvalley Versions 2.12 and M with PM-
10 Measurements to Six GKtoe m the Padflc
Northwest Lane Regional Air Pollution
Authority, Springfield. OR.
a calculated far <
everygridceUiamemoaalafi
to eight grid cefle may be siliPla a as
receptors, far wnlcb time hMories of
-------
/ VoL M. No. 137 / TtoMday. July 20. 1903 / Rulaa and itogul«tiona 3M79
tfaca tha modal
UaartGuldafarlnaDBGADIS:
GasDispankmMmlaLEPAPiibUailoaNa '
modal parfcamtaca. thla |
110 opuBua
riatuad
baiJinnlated fa ground larellow-
NC2771l.(HnSNo.PB
G& «*1IDBM
W-ZUW3)
onhr for nominal control of tha output lilting.
andi«o(aacondaf)rinttXftano»).NottidaDr
is bMtod Mta« te Mthodbof Coleobanda
c.Oilptd
The model cod* ia oahr milabla on Iha
Gantar for Raguktory Air Modal*
Bond Sptam (aae pap B-»>.
• Pitt!
BaCtiOBf
tan
IndadafintabalvfanD:
mala
LVarttafW!ml5p0Mf
Nottmtad
ntarUna
eh do
Wbra the plume ontwllM
tedditti
DEGADIS2.1tea
modalthatcanbauaadto
tnupHt of toxic dMnical
e, and o;*ahiM at aacfa downwind
t irt bund uponTUnur [1969)
ud SUd* (108^ with adtiutaMni* oud* lor
telo tha .
duntion. and t
Off-centerilnadJ»twieetto2
tmnjiuJTiUioii wluat At a
hal^t at aach downwind dUtanca (
en to wad to draw
lalaam; gnmaid anal. I
nlanaa; pound-laval «r alawtad opwatdly.
" - - •
Cona
Tha
and naiat ba aant to tha appnpdata pdnlar
No ftBpB&cal out
cunant vwitttoi
Whin ife plunwontwUiw bat pousii
ittonn. ttow hlatoriai for
(tfapadfiad
ditpanioa ooaffictaaU
r (1969) and
"No gmphteal outout U ganantad bjr tha
• » nt fhu pffftna
t
an bawd upon Tunar (1969) and Slada
(19M). PHfetBound£to** i* tPplM-
varticatd^ankiniaalaobaaadiiponnaulu
from labuatoy aapatiaant* IndaStr-
L Chamjoof namfomation
Not apaciliGUQr tfaaBm.
oyut OH Mlxtun^^
FmiO.TartMa.USAF
SanlCM Labocatoy. PiMl
MMitinMt ftaaCdoo •00%^ JMMi Of
Data may to Input dined? from a*
ttanai input Uiar via kayeaaniHabM am
iter * VAX cenputM
aotraquin
POaTIKAN
not art up to aooapt laal
dataorcowmrt
Tban to no limitation to tha nuabar of
teafaw
awaUabiawitalKtha
aPCrORntANoompUar
to tin
k tip downwaiht building wikt
ffM> flimlartnn arn **tf tnaltd
•vlBGiuiuu IB AtBMMuhanc
-------
•
88880 Federal «agfater / Vol 88. No. 137 / Tueaday. July 20. 1893 /Rules and Regulation
Simulation Model*. Atmotpheric
Environment 18:1341-1355. -
Bjorkhmd. j. R.. and J. F. Bower*. 1982.
Uear'a Inftroctionc totheSHORTZ and
LONGZ Computer Piugfeins. EPA :
Publication No. EPA-«03/9-82-004a and
fa. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Region m, Philadelphia. PA.
Briggt. G: A.. 1969. Plum* Riae. US. Atomic
Energy Cammiarion Critical Review Sariaa,
Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Oak Ridge,
TN. (NTIS No.HD-25075]
Brian, G. A., 1971. Some Recent Anaryaaa of
Plume Riae Obaetvation*. Proceeding* of
the Second International dean Air
Congraaa. edited by R M. Bnglund and W.
T.Barry. Academic Praat. New York. NY.
Brigg*. a A., 1972, Diacu**km OB Chimney
Pfimaa to Netrtral and Stable .
6.507-510.
Brigg*. G. A., 1974. DUudon Estimation to
Snail EmlMioa*. USABC Report ATDL-
106. US. Atomic Energy CommtoaioB. Oak
Ridge. TN.
Brigg*, a A.. 1975. Pram* Rla* Prediction*.
Lecture* on Air PoUutkm and
Environmental impact Anarya**. American
Meteorological Society, Boston. MA. pp.
59-111.—
, G. A., 1964. Plum* Riae and
uyaney Efiecta. Atmospheric Science
ami """"Ti Pr^HniTtiflii] i^anrl BanTitrt nn
(Ed.). DOB Report DOB/nC-27601. . .
Technical Information Canter, Oak Rtdga.
TN. (NTIS No. DB84005177)
Carpenter, S. B., T. L Montgomery. J. M.
I*avltt,W.CQ>Ibaugh.andP.W.
Thomaa. 1971. Principal PumaDtepenkm
ModalK TVA Power Plante. Journal of Air
Pollution Control *«H«nrt, 31:491-
495.
Chock. D. P.. 1980. Uaar'a Guide to the
SimplaUne-Sourc* Modal to Vehicle
ExhauttDiipenionNearaRoad.
^rral Motcn Itoaoarch Labnrtta**Tfj
Warren. ML
Cramer. H. B.. R V. Geary, and J. F. Bower*.
1975. Diflutkm-Mode! Calculation of LOB*
term and Short-term Ground-lava! SOj
ConcantnUoiu lit AUaghnay County,
Paantyhaaia. EPA Publication No. EPA-
M3/9-75-018LU.S. Environmantal
Protection, Agency, Region IB.
PbiladelphiaTPA.
DeManti*. C, A^ 1969. Wind Spaad Profllee
at BrookhavanNatiorjal Laboratory, fournal
of Applied Meteorology, 18:181-189.
Durbln. P. A., T. A. HacS. and G. Z. Whittan,
1975. Mathamattoal Modeling of Simulaiad
Photochamkal Smog. SPA PubUcation No.
SPA-800/4-78-02B. USArvtaoamaotal
Protection Agency. Raaaarch Triaogla Park.
NC
Bachanroeder. A. Q., 1972. Evaluation of a
DiflJHlon Modal toPhotochamical Snog
Simulation. EPA Publication No. EPA-R4-
73-012. UA arrtromnantal Protection
•takfla^k ** * *— Paialf Mi*^
WnjU ABXawa^aV aTWlH *"*
I Reaearca and Technology,
Inc., i960. Uaar'a Guide to RTDM.WC
A"Wor*tCa*aHVer*ion of the ERT Rough
Terrain ModaLERT Document M-
01a^OOOR.Riivlronmaa>alR«iiarchand
Technology, 696 Virginia Road. Concord.
Giflbrd. F. A. and S. R. Hanna. 1970. Urban
Air Pollution Modeling, Proceeding* of the
Second International Clean Air Coagnia,
Academic Pran. WaaUngtoB. D.C; pp.
140-1151.
Glfibrd. F. A., 1975. Atnoaphark Diapanion
Modal* to Environmental Pollution
' Application*. Lecture* on Air Pollution
and BntUonrnental hiipart Analyaaa.
American Meteorological Society. Boaton,
MA.
Goodia. W. R., G. t McRaa, and L a
Seinfeld. 198ft AnObJectiw Analyai*
Technique to Conctructing Thrae-
Dimnuional Urban-Scale Wind Plaid*.
Journal of Applied Meteorology. 19:88-
108.
Hacbt T. A, and I. H. Saufcld. 1974. Further
Development of Generalised Kinetic
MechanlamtoFhotochemical'
Environmental Science and T<
8(4): 327-339.
Hatter, J. L, 1965. The Variation* of
HOnXOOtU UlmlNOtt PaVUeNUM WltD llflM
to Travel Period* of One Hour or Longer.
Journal of AppUad Meteorology, 4:153-
158.
Hatter, J. L.. I960. Air Raaouroae
Laboratoriaa Atmcapheric Transport and
DUparriOB Modal tARL-ATAD).>atmgPwii
^* -— • - - A Bi -*- -* J
Turbulanc«,IMmiaioaai^ Air Pollution,
Rano.NV. — - - —
Laraan. R. 1. J971. A Mathematical Modal to
RaladngAirCjiallryUaaaiiraniantitoAb
Quality StSDdarda. Office of Ak Programa
PubUcationNo.AP-69.UJ.
Elavatad Source in a Corrective Boundary
Layer. Atmotpbaric Bmrinmmant, 14:1-
10,
Weaaly. M. L. and B. B. rUcka. 1977, Some
Factor* That Atfact die Depoatttoo Rate* of
Sulfur Dioxide and Similar Gaaa* on
VegMation. Journal of the Ab Pollution
Control Anodatlan. 27:1110-1116.
Whitten. G. Z.. J. P. Ktlma and H. Hogo. 1980.
fStanulatadr - -
na*aarch
Triangla
L aadF.
Park.NC
McBJroy. J. L aadF. Pooler, 1988. SL Louie
Dtapentoa Study, Vohone D-Anaryaea.
NAPCAPubllcationNaAP-63. National
Air Polmttoa Control Adminiatntion.
VA.
>. A. B. aod K. a Ttanhn, 1979.
Atmotpheric Stability Oat* ft«^
HdflSODtU WiBtt FlllCtlUtiQO* PMMBttd tt
the 72nd Annual Meeting of die Ate
OH.
Moon, & BH T. B. Stoeckaaraa and D. A.
Stewart 1982. A Sum* of Stabatfcd
Modeling off
^ ^•K*Av ^l^t^AtW % tm nl» •• t^^ a l**nlii^ i 41
M WnD AlDKK MKnnlUBlm. VOfDRW 1.
Report. BPA PubJocationNo.gA-
Protection Agency. Raaaareh Triangle Park,
Baala, G. A.. 1971. A Guide to Local
Diaperaion of Air Pollutant*. Air Weather
Service Technical Report ff214 (April
1971).
Colanbrandar. a W.. 1980. A Matbematkal
ModeltetbaTraariaat Behavior of Denee
I
Syinpoihgn on LOM P!»»mlkm «nd Safety
•§^-^— nil—— 1^ A - ^k^AJkAAA •^^U>y^^jA« •AA^|
m QIW noonB omuwiOTa D«*WI»
Aocuncy to Sararal Air Quality Mm
EPA Pttbllotioa No. BPA-I50/4-43-O01.
l of
30;
US.Bn
t.NC
lAgancy.
Mualier. S. P. aodIL J. Valanta. 1983.
telheAlrRaeoui
Aataaamant Modal (Generic Vardon).
TVA/ONR/AQB-«3rt3. Tannaaaae Valley
Authority, Muack Shoal*, AL
Muallar.S. F,R. J. Vaknta.T. UCrawtod.
A. L. Spark*, and L. L. Gantaay. Jr., 1983.
Daacriptioo of the Air Reeourcee
Regional PoUntion Aaaaaamant (ARRPA)
Modal: Saptambar 1983. TVAKWR/
AQB-63/14. Tannaaaaa Valley Authority,
Muad*Sboala.AL.
Myer*.T.C end L&Uagttaft 1961. -
Application of Mataomloglcal aad Air
Graan. A. B, R. P. Singhal andR.
Vankataawar. 1980. Anarytical
of tiw Gauaaian Pram* Modal ft
the Air Pollution Control A
773-778,
Lamb.R.G.. 1978. Numarical Sumilation of
Diapafaia*! ftom an Elevated Point Source
in the Con vactiva Boundary Layer.
Atnotpoarie BnvbonmaBt, 12:1297-1304.
MacCraady, P. B.. L. B. Baboolal and P. B.
Uaaaman, 1974. DlflUaion atidTurbulaace
Aloft Ow Qott|uv)c Tnni&* Pnpcl&t
CA* Am0rion MMnrokMiGu Soocty^
Bo*ton,MA. ^lr^ -
Mian. P. K.. 196ft Diapanion ten Tall
Stack* into a'
Atmotpharic Bnvironmant 14:397-tOO.
Mlara. P. X and A. C McMillan. 1980. On
the DicpanioB Parameters of Phunaa from
r. 19; 178-186.
-------
/ VoL 81. MB. 137 / TuenUy. July 2ft 1993 . Ruin mil Hagdattoio 38881
Mian. P. K. and & Onlock^lOU. Modeimg
Continuous l^tmigation of the Nanticoke
&netBUagSte*kxL Atmospheric
EnvimiMiMMi. tfc 47»-iau.
stade. a R. MS*. Meteorology and <
Energy. US. Atomic BSMtgy
445pp.(NnSNo.TTD-241»)
A[»pendix Cto Appendix WofPert 91—
Example Air Quality Anaivsis Checklist
CO bbwhMtfM
Tbii «*•«*«•> rtrnfnnnmri« • standardized
set of date and a standard basic level of
analysis needed far PSD applications and SIP
revisions. H» checklist implies • level of
inquired to MUM both PS
(tama a* laquind for
• Actual and "
due to difforence between ttw monitoring site
and tha apactte site of the source).
chancterUtici ai a tuactiaa of load far
, and nominal
andtaeNAAQS.ta
require mon or IMI information and the
Regional Mete ~ .....
at an early
base far a
Mist should be consulted
feduMlopmsBtofadate
checklist ihould pt
use
.
l In developing
t
a concaastia on tha daU baw, modallng
techniques and overall technical approach
prior totha actual anahnaa. Such agnamant
will bate avoid mtaindantandiafi
GOOoaniinB tba aaat naulbi and may tadaoa
tha later Mad fcradditloiiaianalyM.
Example Air Quality Anatysi*
OucUMt
1. Sourea locattoa aapd) ahowiag location
wttii napact to*
• Uibuanas.*
. • PSDOanlanaa
• Nonattalnmeni aiaafi
• Topographic t»atu(at(ta(Tain,laka*,rivar
*allam.atc.)>
• Otharma)oraxi«tio(aoutcat>
• OOernuforaooieaaaaDtocttoPSO
raoulmiHiitv
• NWSmatoorologleaIob»arvattoi»
(witeaawlmpparaic)
• Qa alte/iooal aaatooiologtral
.
condltioos If stack aalght 1* lati than GEP
located in complex terrain. Screening
aaalyaaa aa footnoted on page 1 or detailed
analjne*. If Decenary, miut be employed to
determine tha conrtralnlng load condition
"CuideUne on Air Quality Models.
Revised" (BPA-4SO/2-78-027R)
—>"Scnenlng Procedures for EstimaUng the
Air QuaUty impact of Stationary Sources.
"(BPA-*50/R-«-oi9).l«J
->"GuidaUna far Determination of Good
BBgwaarwg Practice Stack Height
(TachnkalSupport Document for the Stack
HatgM Ragulatlonsr tEPA-*SO/4-«0-
023R).198S
-y Ambient Monitoring Guidelines for
PSD" (sVA-uo/4-tr-oon. tosr
lSuajaUttelof
observed (at applied or
.apadflc ana. La., idanttfy possible
lor we siss-
". 40 CPU Parts 40
St (Piniaiillciii of Significant
Datarionttan). 1U2
«e«s»te
MTSas
nfx NTB BtoBbar to be pnvleM).
should bespedfteiasa
« See toetnate a of this chsckUit.
-------
38882 FfrdanJ Regfater / VoL M, No. 137 / Tuesday. July 20. 1903 / Roles «nd JUgulattox
AIR QUAUTY SUMMARY—FOR NEW SOURCE ALONE
Concantnflon DIM to MoctoM Sauna (wjrtn*),
Background ConcwttrBflon (jtaAn*)
tfonWni)
Raoiptor OMMoa (ton) (or UTM EM**}
HwRMt
SMM0I
HWlNt
MNgh
Ngh
»tln MpmM ihMt tor wch paMnt (SO* TSP, CO, NO.. HC, Pb, Ha A«
*UM aliip|M«pMi Mngbig pSo* (W, 34ir. Mw, 24-hr. 304iy, BMi^
Mixing Dmth(m)
SutftnAlrOitaPnm
SuAa Stotiaa Omtkm (m)
Upp« Air Otto P*.
Dqr/Mooth/YMr W Occunaot
Local Qraand
P«iod of Raoord Analywd
AIR QUALITY SUMMARY—FOR Aa NEW SOURCES
Oanomfcflto Dm to Modilid Sou** (M»>B*) .
10onMnMtan(MAni}
toM*orl
(ton)(orUTME««na)
RMMorOlnctenr)(orUTM
plor EwwMn (tn)
Wwltf SpMO fflvi)
tsssf
MflnMt
ancTMlgh
Amuri
•UMMlppr
* T8P, 00, NOw HC, Pb,
. 24-Sf.
an rir
I
Mixing Dtpth(m)
T»mpiitluj» pK) .
Stability
0qr/Moath/YMr of Ooatitmot •
*_J_f mm
AIR QUALITY SUMMARY—FOR ALL SOURCES
i DIM to MoctaM Souro* to**).
fiailA«M>M MM< ^-••maiifcfc^liaja fuM^^rih
wKHyuuno wwtiHUMiun UIQBB^ ••
I (or UTM I
WMSpMd
HMtMt
MHgh
Hgh
AfWIMl
ihM* for Met) poMmt (SO* T8P, CO. NO*, MC, Fh.
StaldUty
Sudan Air Data Pram
SurfMX Statkm Bmtfea (m)
IMghtAbovtlo
Lndtal -
-------
ffedittA j6tiaieT /.VeL SB. No> 1ST / Tuesday. July 20. IMS / Rules and Regulations 3SSS&
STACK PJ
Me
No.
fm)
HmpMbrafK)
(Might (m)
QEP
(m)
STACK PARAMETERS FOR SHORT-TERM MODEUNQ*
Stack
No.
t»
ra» for
(m)
SoKke*
vekMRy(ny
tsrnpertm (-K)
*%SS?
OEP stack
ht(m)
BuMng
tables tar 50%. 75%. 100% of M opemang oanoTeon (and any other opsnaing condMona ea delennlned by aaeenlng or datalsd
lyess to ieprasei« constreMna operas^ oonaaons) ahouM bs piovMed. ^
I
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMUUSATIONOP
niPLEM£NTATK)N PLANS
1. The tutbority citation for put 52 is
feviwd to read as follom:
AxAM*F 42 U&C 7401-7B42.
f«U1 [Amandafl
2. In S 52.21, paragraph fl)(t) ia -
revised to raad aa follows; par
P)(2) is amended by revising "A*'
•Guideline on Air Quality Models
(Revised)' (1986) and Supplementary A
(1987)" to reed "appendix W of part 51
of this chapter ('Guideline on Air
Quality Models (Revised)' (1988),
supplement A (1987) and supplement B
(1993))".
•S331
PART 280-
t WASTE
L104
> control organto
ofafrquaWy.
0)**"
(1) All estimates of ambient '
concentrations required under this
paragraph shall be based on the
applicable air quality medels, data ~-
bases,andod>errequiiMMOtaspedned
in appendix Wof part 51 of this chapter
("Guideline on Air Quality Models
(Revised)" (1988). supplement A (1987)
and supplement B (1993)). Tht
Guideline and its supplements (EPA •
Publication No. 4Safe-78-027R) an
also for sale from the TJ A Department
of Commerce. National Technical
Information Service, 5825 Port Royal
Road, Springfield, VA, 22161.
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, GENERAL
1. The authority citation for part 260
continues to read aa follows:
AndMrtr: 42 VSJC. 6905.691ZU). 6921-
6927.6930.6934.693S. 6937,6938,6999,
and 6974.
ff260.11 [Amendedl
2. Section 260.111* amended by
revising the last reference in paragraph
(a) to read as follows: - .
.11
"Screening Procedures for Estimating
the Air Quality Impact of Stationary
Sources. Revised-. October 1992, EPA
PubUcattonNaEPA-«50m-92-019.
Environmental Protection Agency,
~k Triangle Park, NC
PART 268—STANDARDS FOR THE
MANAGEMENT OF SPECIFIC
HAZARDOUS WASTES AND SPEOFIC
(WASTE
MANAGEMENT FACXJTIES
, 1. The authority citation for part 266
Is revised to read as follows:
Aetharitr: 42 VJSJC. 6909,6012U). 6924.
and 6634.
Appendix X /ItemoveoV
2. Part 266 is amended by removing
sppandlxX.
3. Section 266.104 Is amended by
revising paragraph (eK3) to raad as
follows:
(3) Conduct dispersi
lellng
in
appendix Wof part 51 of this chapter
("Guideline on Air Quality Modeb
(Revised)** (1986) and its supplements).
the "Hazardous Waste Combustion Air
Quality Screening Procedure", provided
in appendix tX of this part, or in
Screening Procedures for Estimating the
Air Quality Impact of Stationary
Sources, Revised (incorporated by
reference hi S 260.11) to predict the
ground L
J avenge off-site
TCDD equivalents dc
utrat
on of 2,3.7.6-
inedundc
paragraph (eH2) of this section. The
maximum annual average concentration
must be used when a person resides on-
atto;and
4. Section 286.108 Is amended by
revising paragraph (h) to read as
follows:
(h) Diipmion Modeling. Dispersion
modeUng required under this section
Aall be conducted epGQpli«w to
methods recommended in appendix W
of part 51 of this chapter ("Guideline a
Air Qu*ltty Model* (Revised)" (1986)
and its supplements), the "Hazardous
Waste Combustion Air Quality
Screening Procedure", provided in
on
•es for Estimating the Air
-------
38884 Fated Register / VoL 58, No. 137 / Tuesday. July 20, 1993 / Rules and Regulations
Quality Impact of Stationary Sources,
Revised (incorporated by referenced
S 260.11) to predict the maximum
annual avenge off-tite ground level
concen.tration. However, on-site '
itratie
tt be considered
when a person resides bn-site.
[FR Doc 93-16867 Piled 7-1W3; 8:45 «n]
I
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.OO-21
SPA 15
Revision Checklist 126 Summary''
t
Rule 1 Title:
Rule 2 Title:
Checklist Title:
Reference:
Promulgation Date:
Effective Date:
Cluster:
Provision Type:
Linkage:
Optional:
Testing and Monitoring Activities
Testing and Monitoring Activities, Land Disposal Restrictions
Correction
Testing and Monitoring Activities
58 F_B 46040-46051 and 59 FR 47980*47982
August 31, 1993 and September 19, 1994
August 31,1993 and August 31,1993
RCRA Cluster IV
HSWA/Non-HSWA
Revision Checklists 11, 35, 67 and 73
No
Summary: The August 31 (58 FR 46040) rule replaces the current Second Edition (including
Updates I and II) of the EPA-approved "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,
Physical/Chemical Methods," EPA Publication SW-846, by incorporating by reference the Third
Edition (and its first update) in 5 260.11. This rule also revises Part 261 Appendices II
(Method 1311, Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure) and III (Chemical Analysis Test
Methods) to refer directly to SW-846; deletes Part 261 Appendix X (Method of Analysis for
Chlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins and Dibenzof urans); and revises Part 268 Appendices I (Toxicity
Characteristic Leaching Procedure) and IX (Extraction Procedure Toxicity Test) to refer to SW-
846. In conjunction with these changes, various references to the methods formerly
contained in these appendices are changed to refer directly to SW-846.
The September 19th (59 EB 47980) rule corrects the unintended removal of text from 40 CFR
268.7{a) by August rule. Paragraph 268.7(a) sets out the generator waste analysis and
recordkeeping requirements of the land disposal restrictions under Subtitle C of RCRA. The
August rule revised the reference to Appendix IX of Part 268 to refer to SW-846 Methods
1311 and 1310, instead. The Agency had intended to revise only the introductory text of
268.7(a) and to retain without changing the subparagraphs following the introductory text.
Due to an inadvertent administrative error the subparagraphs following the introduction were
removed. The September rule makes clear that it was not the Agency's intention to remove
these paragraphs and that they remain in effect, and are regarded by the Agency, to have
been in effect continuously in the form published in the CFR revised as of July 1,1993. For
this reason, the September rule was not made into a separate checklist.
State Authorization: These rules are placed in RCRA Cluster IV. The State modification
deadline is July 1, 1995 (or July 1. 1996 if a State statutory change is necessary). The
changes for all provisions except 261.22. 261.24, and Appendix II, Part 261, do not go into
effect until States become authorized for them because this rule was promulgated under pre-
HSWA authorities. Only final authorization is available. The changes to 261.22, 261.24,
Appendix II, Part 261 and 268.7(a) affect the Toxicity Characteristic and the TCLP, both of
which were added due to HSWA authority. Thus, these changes are considered HSWA
provisions and go into effect immediately. Both interim and final authorization are available,
with interim authorization expiring on January 1, 2003. The State Revision Application must
SUM126.1B- 1/12/94
[Prinu* 12/21/841
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
Revision Checklist 126 Summary (cont'd)
include applicable regulations, AG statement addendum, Revision Checklist 126, other
associated checklists and other application materials, i.e. a program description and an MOA,
as determined by the Regional office.
...... • - . • - • •'• :-
Attorney General's Statement Entry: The following new entry should be placed at Subsection
I BB in the Model Revision Attorney General's Statement.
BB. State statutes and regulations replace the current Second Edition
(including Updates I and II) of the "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, ,
Physical/Chemical Methods," EPA Publication SW-846, by incorporating by
reference the Third Edition (and its first update) of this test methods manual.
Throughout the State's code, references to test methods directly refer to the
methods as they are found in SW-846, as indicated in Revision Checklist 126.
Federal Authority: RCRA §11006; 2002, 3001, 3002, 3004, 3005, 3006,
3010, and 3014; 40 CFR 260.11 (a); 260.22(d)(1)(i); 261.22(a)(1)&(2);
261.24(a); 261 Appendices II, III, and X; 264.190(a); 264.314(c); 265.190(a);
265.314(d); 268.7(a>; 268.40(a); 268.41 (a); 268 Appendices I & IX; 270.6(a);
270.19(c)(1)(iii)&(iv); 270.62(b)(2)(i)(C)&(D); and 270.66(c){2)(i)&(ii) as
amended August 31, 1993 (58 ER 46040) and September 19, 1994 (59 EE
47980).
Citation of Laws and Reaulations: Date of Enactment and Adootion
I
Remarks of the Attorney General
The following should replace the entry at Subsection I F in the Model Revision Attorney
General's Statement:
F. State statutes and regulations incorporate the second edition and
updates to "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical .
Methods" (SW-846) as indicated in Revision Checklists 11, 35, and 126.
Federal Authority: RCRA §§2002, 3001; 40 CFR 260.11, 260.21 and
270.6(a) as amended December 4, 1984 (49 £E 47390), March 16,1987 (52
F_B 8072) and August 31, 1993 (58 FR 46040).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Enactment and Adoption
Remarks of the Attorney General
SUM120.15-1/12/94
(Print** 12/21/94]
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 126
% I
- 1
Testing and Monitoring Activities
58 FR 46040-46051
August 31, 1993
as amended September 19, 1994, at 59 FR 47980-47982
(RCRA Cluster tV, HSWA/Non-HSWA provisions)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
t
PART 260 - HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM: GENERAL
SUBPART B - DEFINITIONS
REFERENCES
revise reference to
"Test Methods for
Evaluating Solid
Waste, Physical/
Chemical Methods" to
refer to third edition;
add ASTM Method
E926-88 to the end of
the list of publications
incorporated by
reference; remove
unnumbered paragraph
and list of analytical
testing methods;
remove footnote 1
following the list of
publications
incorporated by
reference
260. 11 (a)
August 31,1993 - Page 1 of 12
OCL120.1S - R*viM* 09/29/93
PmMd 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9641.00-21
RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 126: Testing and Monitoring Activities (cont'd) SPA 15
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
^•' .'
FEDERAL ROM CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS: fl^fc,
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
W
BROADER
INSCQA^Bt
SUBPART C - RULFMAKING -PETITIONS ^^
PETITIONS TO AMEND PART 261 TO EXCLUDE A WASTE PRODUCED AT A PARTICULAR
FACILITY
add "of this chapter "
after1* part 261";
replace "appendix III"
with reference to
"Test Methods for
Evaluating Solid
Waste, Physical/
Chemical Methods"
260.22(d){1)(i>
PART 261 - IDENTIFICATION AND LISTING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
SUBPART C - CHARACTERISTICS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
CHARACTERISTIC OF CORROSIVITY
remove text after
"using" and replace
with reference to
MatfinH -QftAft -in-'TaAt •-
IVIUU IUU 9\l*rw in 1 SSI
Methods for Evaluating
Solid Waste, Physical/
Chemical Methods"
after "Test Methods
for", replace "the
Evaluation of" with
"Evaluating"; change
"{incorporated by
reference, see
§260.11)" to", as
incorporated by,
reference in 260.1 1 of
+hia fthfintar *• ^omnua
mis uiiapioi* f loiiiuvtj
the rest of the
paragraph
261. 22(a> (1)
261.22(a)(2)
1
August 31, 1993 - Page 2 of 12
DCL12«.15
09/29^3
12/21/9*
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 126: Testing and Monitoring Activities (cont'd) SPA 15
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
I
TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC
replace "test methods
described in appendix
II or equivalent
methods approved by
the Administrator
under the procedures
set forth in §§ 260.20
and 260.21" with
reference to the TCLP
in "Test Methods for
Evaluating Solid
Waste, Physical/
Chemical Methods" as
incorporated by
reference at 260.1 1 ;
replace "Appendix H"
with "Method 1311"
261.24(a)
APPENDIX II TO PART 261
METHOD 1311 TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC LEACHING PROCEDURE (TCLP)
replace TCLP with
note referencing the
TCLP in "Test
Methods for Evaluating
Solid Waste, Physical/
Chemical Methods"
Appendix II
APPENDIX III TO PART 261
CHEMICAL ANALYSIS TEST METHODS
replace introductory
paragraphs and tables
1 , 2, and 3 with note
referencing Chapter 2
of "Test Methods for
Evaluating Solid
Waste, Physical/
Chemical Methods"
Appendix III
APPENDIX X TO PART 261
METHOD OF ANALYSIS FOR CHLORINATED DIBENZO-P-DIOXINS AND -DIBENZOFURANS
August 31, 1993 - Page 3 of 12
DCL120.15 -RwriMd: 09/29/93
Printed: 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 126: Testing and Monitoring Activities (cont'd) SPA 15
FEDERAL REQUREMENTS
remove
• ' '
t
PEDERAL HCRA CITATION
Appendix X -
*
ANALOGOUS STATE CITATION
» - ' ••'*.'*
STATE ANALOG IS: fl^|
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STMN.
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT '
BROADER
JNSCg^
~~w
PART 264 - STANDARDS FOR OWNERS AND OPERATORS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
TREATMENT, STORAGE, AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES
SUBPART J - TANK SYSTEMS
APPLICABILITY
replace "EPA* with
"the following test
must be used:";
change "Wastes* to
"Waste"; add comma
after "Physical/
Chemical Methods";
remove parentheses
from "(EPA Publication
No. SW-846}'; remove
"No."; replace "must
be used" with ", as
incorporated by
reference in S 260.1 1
of this chapter"
... . . -
•'";;!
264.190(8)
. ...
August 31, 1993 - Page 4 of 12
DCU2Q.15 - RwriMd: 09/29/93
Printed: 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.OO-21
RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 126: Testing and Monitoring Activities (cont'd) SPA 15
J"
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
f
FEDERAL RCRA OTATION
.•
ANALOGOUS STATE CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
SUBPART N --LANDFILLS
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR BULK AND CONTAINERIZED LIQUIDS
change "Wastes" to
"Waste"; change the
period after "Physical/
Chemical Methods" to
a comma; remove
brackets from "(EPA
Publication No. SW-
846J"; remove "No.";
add ", as incorporated
by reference in
§ 260.11 of this
chapter" at end of
sentence
•
264.3 14(c)
t
PART 265 - INTERIM STATUS STANDARDS FOR OWNERS AND OPERATORS OF
HAZARDOUS WASTE TREATMENT, STORAGE, AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES
SUBPART J - TANK SYSTEMS
APPLICABILITY
replace first
occurrence of "EPA"
with "the following
test must be used:";
change "Wastes" to
"Waste"; add comma
after "Physical/
Chemical Methods";
remove parentheses
from "(EPA Publication
No. SW-846)"; remove
"No."; replace "must
be used" with ", as
incorporated by
reference in § 260.1 1
of this chapter"
— -••---•
265.190(a)
>
August 31, 1993 - Page 5 of 12
00.120.15 • R*viwd 09/29/93
Pnnttd: 12/2W34
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 126: Testing and Monitoring Activities (cont'd) SPA 15
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS: fl^B
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
^
BROADER
SUBPART N -.LANDFILLS
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR BULK AND CONTAINERIZED LIQUIDS
change "Wastes" to
Waste"; after
"Physical/Chemical
Methods', change the
period to a comma; , ^
remove brackets from
"[EPA Publication No.
SW-846]"; remove
."No."; add ", as
incorporated by
reference in § 260.11
of this chapter" at end
of sentence
.,
,
265.314(d)
..
i
August 31,1993 - Page 6 of 12
OCL126.16 -RmriMd-
09129193
12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 126: Testing and Monitoring Activities (cont'd) SPA 15
FEDERAL REQUWEMENTS
EEDERAL RCRA CITATION
. •
ANALOGOUS STATE CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
PART 268 - LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS
SUBPART A - GENERAL
WASTE ANALYSIS AND RECORDKEEPING
1 add comma after first
"S 268.32"; replace
"test method
described in part 261 ,
appendix II" with
reference to the TCLP
in "Test Methods for
Evaluating Solid
Waste, Physical/
Chemical Methods";
remove "of this
chapter* after "subpart
C"; replace "test
method described in
appendix IX of this
part* with reference to
the EP toxicity test in
"Test Methods for
Evaluating Solid
Waste, Physical/
Chemical Methods";
change "his" to "this"
before "waste
displays"; remove "of
this part" after
•S 268.2"
268.7(a)
,
t
August 31,1993 - Page 7 of 12
DCL12fl.16
09/29/93
12/21/9*
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 126: Testing and Monitoring Activities (cont'd) SPA 15
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STHN-
GENT
MORE
STRM. | BROADER
GENT
SUBPART D - TREATMENT STANDARDS
APPLICABILITY OF TREATMENT STANDARDS
replace "the test
method in appendix II
of part 261" with
"Method 1311, the
.Toxicity Characteristic
Leaching Procedure";
replace "the test .
method in 40 CFR. part
261, appendix II, or t
the test method in
appendix IX of this
part" with reference to
Methods 1310 and
1311; add sentence, .
at end of paragraph, •'.
regarding Methods '•--•
1310 and 1311 in ~.
"Test Methods for
Evaluating Solid
Waste, Physical/ ~
Chemical Methods*
. •
-
1
r *
n
-
: ' -i *
' .'. :
268.40(a)
;
,
-
TREATMENT STANDARDS EXPRESSED AS CONCENTRATIONS IN WASTE EXTRACT
replace "the test
method in appendix 1
of this part* with
•Method 1311, the
Toxicity Characteristic
Leaching Procedure,";
add sentence
regarding Method
1311 in "Test
Methods for Evaluating
Solid Waste, Physical/
Chemical Methods* at
end of paragraph
. ..
i "
268.41(a)
•-
August 31, 1993 - Page 8 of 12
OCL124.15
R*vi*«i 09/29/93
12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 126: Testing and Monitoring Activities (cont'd) SPA 15
*•
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
,'
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
.!•
ANALOGOUS STATE CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
APPENDIX I TO PART 268
TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC LEACHING PROCEDURE (TCLP)
replace note regarding
TCLP in Appendix II of
part 261 with note
regarding TCLP in
"Test Methods for
Evaluating Solid
Waste, Physical/
Chemical Methods"
268 Appendix I
APPENDIX IX TO PART 268
EXTRACTION PROCEDURE (EP) TOXICITY TEST METHOD AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY
TEST {METHOD 1310)
replace EP Toxicity
Test method with note
regarding EP in "Test
Methods for Evaluating
Solid Waste, Physical/
Chemical Methods"
268 Appendix IX
PART 270 - EPA ADMINISTERED PERMIT PROGRAMS: THE HAZARDOUS WASTE PERMIT
PROGRAM
SUBPART A - GENERAL INFORMATION
REFERENCES
replace information on
"Test Methods for
Evaluating Solid
Waste, Physical/
Chemical Methods"
with reference to
260.11
270.6{a)
August 31,1993 - Page 9 of 12
DCL126.15 - tovMd: 09/29/93
Primed: 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
FtCRA REVISION .CHECKLIST 126: Testing and Monitoring Activities (cont'd) SPA 15
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
• ' * • 1
ANALOGOUS STATE CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS: ^|
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
INSCOJB
SUBPART B - PERMIT APPLICATION
SPECIFIC PART B INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS FOR INCINERATORS
in the last sentence,
change "methods for
the evaluation of" to
"Methods for
Evaluating"; add a
comma after
"Physical/Chemical
Methods"; replace
"(incorporated by
reference, see § 270.6
and referenced in 40
CFR part 261,
appendix III)" with
"EPA Publication SW-
846, as incorporated
by reference in
§ 260.11 of this
chapter and § 270.6"
change "the Evaluation
of" to "Evaluating";
add a comma after
"Physical/Chemical
Methods"; replace
"(incorporated by
reference, see
§ 270.6)" with "EPA
Publication SW-846,
as incorporated by
reference in § 260.1 1
of this chapter and
§ 270.6"
:'i . i,; n :'
'"• '• '-v/-- --- - 1 "»
•• •*•"*" - - J •*
» • - • f
,
, 'i
270.19(c)(1)(iii)
"
•JKi - .. ..
.-Of
270.19(c)(1Kiv)
V
•
•
August 31, 1993 - Page 10 of 12
DO.12B.1S -ItoviMd: 09/29/93
12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 126: Testing and Monitoring Activities (cont'd) SPA 15
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
i
t
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
t
ANALOGOUS STATE CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
SUBPART F - SPECIAL FORMS OF PERMITS
HAZARDOUS WASTE INCINERATOR PERMITS
in the last sentence,
change "the Evaluation
of" to "Evaluating";
add a comma after
" Physical/Chemical
Methods"; replace
"(incorporated by
reference, see
§ 270.6)" with "EPA
Publication SW-846,
as incorporated by
reference in § 260.11
of this chapter and
§ 270.6"
change "the Evaluation
of" to "Evaluating";
replace "(incorporated
by reference, see
§ 270.6)" with "EPA
Publication SW-846,
as incorporated by
reference in § 260.1 1
of this chapter and
S 270.6"
r
270.62(b)(2)(i)(C)
270.62(b)(2)(i)(D)
4
"
I
August 31, 1993 - Page 11 of 12
DCL12B.15 - RaviMd:
09/29/93
12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 126: Testing and Monitoring Activities (cont'd) SPA 15
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BRC
IN!
PERMITS FOR BOILERS AND INDUSTRIAL FURNACES BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTE
in the last sentence,
insert "waste* before
"analysis'; add
opening quotation
mark before "Test";
add comma and
closing quotation mark
after "Physical/
Chemical Methods";
replace "(incorporated
by reference, see
5 270.6)" with "EPA
Publication SW-846,
as incorporated by
reference in § 260.1 1
of this chapter and
§ 270.6"
add opening quotation
mark before "Test
Methods"; add comma
and closing quotation
mark after "Physical/
Chemical Methods";
replace "(incorporated
by reference, see
§ 270.6)" with "EPA
Publication SW-846,
as incorporated by
reference in § 260.1 1
of this chapter and
§ 270.6"
•
270.66(c)(2Hi) -
,. *> ; '
'*•• .
_ t . .
270.66(c)(2)(ii)
-
•
I/ The September 19 (59 ER 47980) rule indicates that it was not EPA's intention to remove the
subparagraphs of 268.7(a) as the August 31, 1993 rule (58 FR 46040) implied. The provisions
have remained in affect continuously in the form published in the CFR revised as of July 1, 1993.
August 31,1993 - Page 12 of 12
DCL120.15
09/29/93
12/21/94
-------
46040 Federal Register / Vol. 58, No. 167 / Tuesday. August 31, 1993 / Rules and Regulations
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 260,261,264,2*5, 268,
and 270
[FRU-3S81-7]
R!N2050-AC32
Hazardous Waste Management
System; Testing and Monitoring
Activities
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Final rule. ..
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA or Agency) is amending its
hazardous: —aste regulations under
subtitle C of the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976, as
amended, for testing and monitoring
activities. These amendments replace
the current Second Edition, including
Updates I and n, of the EPA approved
test methods manual "Test Methods for
Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/
Chemical Methods," EPA Publication
SW-846, by incorporating by reference
the Third Edition (and its first update)
into the RCRA regulations. These
amendments also revise Appendices
H—Method 1311 Toxidty Characteristic
Leaching Procedure (TCLP) and ID—
Chemical Analysis Test Methods to 40
CFR part 261, delete Appendix X—
Method of Analysis for Q»fa»faM»««i
Dibenzo-p-dioxins and Dibenzofurans.
Method 8280. to 40 CFR part 281, and
revise Appendices I—Toxidty
Characterise Leaching Procedure
(TCLP) and ~<—Extraction Procedure
(EP) Toxidty Test, to 40 CFR part 268.
This action is necessary to provide
better end more complete analytical test
methods for RCRA-fsktod testing. The
intent of this amendment is to provide
up-to-date technologies in order to
promote cost effectiveness and
flexibility in choosing analytical test
methods.
EFFECTIVE DATE: August 31,1993. The
incorporation by reference of certain
publications listed in the regulations is
approved by the Director of the Federal
Register as of August 31,1993.
ADDRESSES: The official record for this
rulemaking (Docket No. F-93-WTMF-
| FFFFF) is located at the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 401
M Street, SW., Washington. DC 20460
(room M-2427), and is available for
viewing from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m.. Monday
through Friday, excluding Federal
holidays. The public must make an
I appointment to review docket materials
by calling (202) 260-4327. The public*
may copy a maximum of 100 pages of
material £
at no cost:
P*
many on<
iddltional
regulatory docket
x»piescost $0.15
Copras of the Third Edition of SW- *'
846 and of Update I to the Thiri Edition-
an part of the official docket for Uus
rulemaking, and also are available from
the Superintendent of Documents.
Government Printing Office fGPOL
Washington. DC 20402, (202) 783-3238.
The GPO document number is 955-001-
00000-1. New subscriptions to SW-846
may be ordered from GPO at a cost of
$319.00. Those persons who have
copies of the Third Edition of SW-846
that were purchased from GPO and wish
to receive the final version of Update I
and future revisions can do so by
renewing their subscriptions with GPO
for $221.00. Then is a 25% surcharge
for foreign subscriptions and nnewala.
FOR FURTHER WFOfUIATION CONTACT: For
general information contact the RCRA
Hotline at (800) 424-9346 {toil free) or
call (703) 920-9810; or. for heaving
impaired, call TDD (800) 553-7672 or
(703) 486-3323. For technical
information, contact Kim Kirkland.
Office of Solid Waste (OS-331L U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency. 401
M Street, SW., Washington. DC 20460.
(202) 260-4761.
SUPPLEMENTARY •FORMATION:
Preamble Outline
L Authority
E Background Seminary and ITagulahiif
Framework
DL Response to Comments frost DM
January 23,1989 NPRM
A. Overview of Proposed RnJe
B. Substitution of toe Thiid Edition
for ore Second Edition Tnr huBng
Addition of New Methods and
Revision of Existing Methods
C Methods Format
D. Mandatory Use of Revised Chapter
One
TV. Response to Comments fnan th*
February 8,1990 Notice
A. Overview of Notice
B. Revised Chapter One
C Trace Analysis vs. Mi
D. Equipment, Standards and 1
Preparation
E. Holding Times
F. Representative Sampling
G. Analysis of Nonaqueoue UajaUa
for Elemental Spedes
H. Method of Standard AdaVtton mi
Matrix Spikes
L Spike Recovery Correction
J. Reagent Giade Water
K. Appendices m and X to 46 CFB
Part 261
V. Technical Changes '
A. Revising Appendix n of Part 261
by Delating the Toxidty
^"'exiteristte Leaching Frop^dwe
Characteristic Leaching Procedure
(TCLP), and Adding Reference to
the TCLP. SW-846 Method 1311 to
Appendix H and $ 261.24
B. Revising Appendices I and IX of
Part 268 by Deleting the Reference
to the TCLP found in Appendix H,
Part 261, from Appendix I of Part
268 and Deleting the EP Toxidty
Test from Appendix IX of Part 268:
and Adding References to the TCLP.
SW-846 Method 1311 and the EP.
SW-846 Method 1310 in the
Respective Appendices and in
SS268.7(a). 268.40(a) and 268.41(a)
C Deleting the Liquid Release Test,
Method 9096 from SW-646 Third
Edition and Update I
D. Removing the 47 Analytical
Methods Incorporated by Reference
in§260.11(a)
E. Deleting References to Equivalent
Methods in §§ 261.22(a)(l) and (2)
and 261.24(a)
F. Deleting the Reference to Method
5.2 in S 261.22(a)(l) and Adding in
its Place the Reference to Method
9040
G. Adding Clarification that
References to SW-846 in
§§ 264.190(8). 264.3H(c),
265.190(a). 265.314(d),
270.19(c)(l)(iii) and (iv).
270.62(b)(2)(i)(C) and (D). and
270.66(c)(2)U) and (ii) are to SW-
846 as Incorporated by Reference in
f 260.11
H. Revising S 270.6 to cross reference
{260.11
VI. State Authority
Vn. Effective Date
vm. Regulatory Analyses
A. Regulatory Impact Analysis
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
C Paperwork Reduction Act
L Authority
These regulations ere being
promulgated under the authority of
•actions 1008.2002,3001,3002.3004,
3005,3006,3010, and 3014 of the Solid
Waste Disposal Act. as amended by the
Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act of 1976 (commonly known as
RCRA). as amended (42 U.S.C. 6905.
6912, 6921,6922,6924,6925,6926.
6930. and 69351.
n.
iryaad
kground
Regulatory Framework
EPA Publication SW-846, 'Test
Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste.
Physical/Chemical Methods," contains
the analytical and test methods that EPA
has evaluated and found to be among
tfaeaa acceptable for testing under
Subtitle C of the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA). as
amended. Use of some of these methods
-------
Federal Register / Vol. 58. No. 167 / Tuesday. August 31. 1993 / Rules and Regulations 46041
is required by specific regulation*, as
discussed below. All of these methods
are intended to promote accuracy,
sensitivity, specificity, precision, and
•• comparability of analyses and test '
results. '
Several of the hazardous waste
regulations under Subtitle C of RCRA
require that specific testing methods
described in SW-846 be employed for
certain applications. Any reliable .
analytical method may be used to meet
other requirements in 40 CFR Parts 280
through 270. For the convenience of the
reader, die Agency lists below a number
of sections found in 40 CFR parts 280
rtbrough 270 that require the use of a
specific method for a particular
application, or the use of appropriate
SW-846 methods in general:
- (1) Section 260.22(d)(l)(i>-
Submission of data in support of'
petitions to exclude a waste produced at
a particular utility (i.e., delisting
petitions);
(2) Section 261.22(a)(l) and (2)—
Evaluation of waste against the
corrosivity characteristic;
(3) Section 261.24(a)-Laadting
procedure for evaluation of a waste
against the toxidty characteristic;
(4) Sections 264.190(a).264.314(c).
265.190(a).and 265.314(d)-£valuation
of a waste to determine if free liquid is
a component of the waste;
(5) Section 266.112(b)(l)—Certain
analysis in support of exclusion from
the definition of a hazardous waste of a
residue which was derived from '•••
burning hazardous waste la boilers md
industrial furnaces:
(6) Section 268.32U)—Evaluation of a
waste to determine if it it* liquid lor
purposes of certain land disposal
(7) Sections 288.40(a). 268.41(a). end
268.43{a)-Leecnmg procedure for
evaluation of waste extract to determine
compliance with Land Disposal
treatment standards; • •
(8) Sections 270.19(c)(l) (ili) and (iv).
and 270.62(b)(2)(i) (Q and (D>-
Andyste and approximate-
quantification of the hazardous
constituents identified in the waste
prior to conducting a trial bum In
support of an application for a
hazardous waste incineration permit:
and
(9) Sections 270.22(aM2Mii)(B) and
270.66{c)(2) (i) end (ii)-Analysi*
conducted in support of a destruction
and removal efficiency (ORE) trie! ban
waiver for boilers and industrial
furnaces bunting low risk waste*- and
hazardous waste in a boiler and
Industrial furnace. ,
In other situations, this EPA
publication functions as a guidance
document setting forth acceptable,
.although not required,.methods to be
•implemented by the user, as
appropriate, in responding to RCRA-
related sampling and analysis
requirements.
-~ SW-846 is a document that will
change qver time .as new information
and data are developed. Advances in
analytical Instrumentation and
techniques an continually reviewed by
the Agency's Office of SoUd Waste
(OSW) and periodically incorporated
into SW-848 to support changes in the
regulatory program and to improve
method performance. Therefore, EPA
solicits any available data and
information that may affect the
usefulness of SW-646.
From the
m. Response to <
January 23.1989 NPRM
A. Overview of Proposed Rule ... -.
On January 23,1989 (54 FR 3212-
3229). the Agency proposed to amend
Its hazardous waste testing and
monitoring regulations under subtitle C
of RCRA by: (1) Adding new methods to
SW-646; (2) revisin
in SW-846: (3)
•ting methods
the use of the
Third Edition, as amended by Update I,
for all testing for which SW-B4* •
methods are specifically mandated in
current Subtitle C regulations; and (4)
rocedures found in Chapter
Control
One of SW-846 for all testing pursuant
to Subtitle C of RCRA. The proposal
discussed m detail the advantages of die
Third Edition over the Second Edition.
including the Third Edition's use of a
standard method format and the
inclusion of a number of now and
revised methods in the Third Edition,
The Agency solicited comments on
each of these proposed changes. Items B
through D of this section summarize the
comments that were received and the
-actioru taken by the Agency in response
to those comments.!
B.Sabttitatiafi of tt* Third Edition for
1'the Second Edition Including Addition
o/New Msthods and Revision of
Existing Mtthods
The Agency proposed to replace the
Second Edition of SW-846. including
Updates I end D of the Second Edition.
with methods contained in the Third
Edition, as amended by Update I of the
1 for Vtrial bum in support of
an application for a permit to burn
Third Edition. The Agency i
this substitution because the i
contained in the Third Edition as
amended by Update I expand the scope
of the Second Edition or are iroprov]
versions of the methods in the!
Edition.
Except as discussed below and in the
background document in the official
record for this rulemaking. the Agency
did not receive any significant negative
comments on the proposal to replace the
Second Edition of SW-846 methods
with the versions contained in the Third
Edition as amended by Update I.
Therefore, the Agency has made this
replacement by revising 40 CFR 260.11
to incorporate the Third Edition as
amended by Update 1 by reference.
Consistent with that change, a footnote
in 40 CFR 260.11 discussing a
distinction between the Second and
Third Edition has been deleted. A
listing of all parts found in the Third
Edition of SW-646 as amended by
Update I is provided below: *
SW-846 Third Edition, Update I
Disclaimer
Abstract
Table of Contents
Method Index and Conversion Table
Pretax
Chapter One—Quality Control
1.0 Introduction
2.0 QA Protect Plan
3.0 Pield Operations
4.0 Laboratory Operations
5.0 Definitions
6.0 Reference*
Chapter Two—Choosing the Correct
Procedure
2.1 Purpose'"
2.2 Required Information
2.3 boplsoeattDg the Guidance
2.4 Characteristics
2.S Ground Water'
Chapter Three Metallic Analyte*
3.1 Sampling Considerations
3.2
I
Method 3005A: Acid Digestion of Waters
for Total Recoverable or Dissolved
Metals far Analysis by Flame Atonic
Absorption (FAA) or Inductively
Coupled Plasma OCP) Spectroscopy
Method 3010A; Add Digestion of Aqueous
Sample* and Extracts for Total Metals for
Analysis by Flans Atonic Absorption
(FAA)orl
(lCP)Sp«ctroecopT
Method 3020A: Add Digestion of
Samples and Extracts for Total
Analysis by Graphite Punace Atomic
Absorption (GPAA) Spsctroscopy
Method 304ft Dissolution Procedure for
Oil*. Greases, or Waxes
Method 3050A; Acid Diaeetion of
Sediments. Sludges, and Sous
3.3 Methods fctPateiiiilnstinnof 1
WTMF-WFFP)
ief-A"
» <«M Mthod hat beea tevtoed once).
-------
46042 Federal Register / Vol. SB, No. 167 / Tuesday. August 31, 1993 / Rule* and Regulations
t
Method 601QA: Inductively Coupled
Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectroscopy
Method 7000A: Atomic Absorption
Methods
Method 7020: Aluminum (AA, Direct
Aspiration) '
Method 7040: Antimony (AA, Dinct
Aspiration)
Method 7041: Antimony (AA, Furnace
Technique)
Method 7060: Arsenic (AA, Funuce
Technique)
Method 7061 A: Arsenic ( AA, Gaseous
Hydride)
Method 7080: Barium (AA. Direct
Aspiration)
Method 7081: Barium ( AA, Furnace
Technique)
Method 7090: Beryllium (AA, Dinct
Aspiration)
Method 7091: Beryllium (AA, Furnace
Technique)
Method 7130: Cadmium (AA. Dinct
Aspiration)
Method 7131: Cadmium (AA, Furnace
Technique)
Method 7140: Calcium (AA, Direct
Aspiration)
Method 7190: Chromium (AA, Direct .
Aspiration)
Method 7191: Chromium (AA, Furnace
Technique)
Method 719S: Chromium, Hexavalent
(Coprecipitation)
Method 7196A: Chromium, Hexavalent
(Colorimetric)
Method 7197: Chromium. Hexavalent
(ClMlation/Extnetion)
Method 7198: Chromium. Hexavalent
(Differential Pulse Polarography)
Method 7200: Cobalt (AA. Dinct
Aspiration)
Method 7201: Cobalt (AA, Furnace
Technique)
Method 7210: Copper (AA. Dinct
Aspiration)
Method 7211: Copper (AA, Furnace
Technique)
Method 7380: ton (AA, Dinct Aspiration)
Method 7381: Iron (AA. Furnace
Technique)
Method 7420: Lead (AA. Direct Aspiration)
Method 7421: Lead (AA. Furnace
Technique)
Method 7430: Lithium (AA. Direct
Aspiration)
Method 7450: Magnesium (AA, Dinct
Aspiration)
Method 7460: Manganese (AA, Dinct
Aspiration)
Method 7481: Manganese (AA. Furnace
Technique)
Method 7470: Mercury to Liquid Waste
(Manual Cold-Vapor Technique)
Method 7471: Mercury in Solid or
Semisolid Waste (Manual Cold-Vapor
Technique)
Method 7480: Molybdenum (AA. Dinct
Aspiration)
Method 7481: Molybdenum (AA, Furnace
Technique)
Methed 7520: Nickel (AA. Dinct
Method 7550: Osmium (AA. Direct
Aspiration)
Method 7610: Potassium (AA. Direct
Aspiration)
Method 7740: Selenium (AA. Furnace
Technique) *
Method 7741: Selenium (AA, Gaseous •
Hydride)
Method 7760A: Silver (AA, Dinct
Aspiration)
Method 7761: Silver (AA. Furnace
Technique)
Method 7770: Sodium (AA, Direct
Aspiration)
Method 7780: Strontium (AA, Direct
Aspiration)
Method 7840: Thallium (AA. Direct
Aspiration)
Method 7841: Thallium (AA, Furnace
Technique)
Method 7870: Tin (AA. Dinct Aspiration)
Method 7910: Vanadium (AA, Dinct
Aspiration)
.Method 7911: Vanadium (AA. Furnace
Technique)
Method 7950: Zinc (AA, Dinct Aspiration)
Method 7951: Zinc (AA, Furnace
Technique)
Chapter Four—Organic Analytes
4.1 General Considerations
4.2 Sample Preparation Methods
4.2.1 Extractions and Preparations
Method 3500A: Organic Extraction and
Sample Preparation
Method 3510A: Separately Funnel Liquid-
Liquid Extraction
Method 3520A: Continuous Liquid-Liquid
Extraction
Method 3540A: Soxhlet Extraction
Method 3550: Sanitation Extraction
Method 3580A: Waste Dilution
Method SO3OA: Pings-end-Tnp
Method 5040: Protocol fat Analysis of
Sorbent Cartridges from Volatile Organic
Sampling Train '
4.2.2 Cleanup
Method 3600A: Cleanup
Method 3610A: Alumina Column Cleanup
Method 3611A: Alumina Column Cleanup
and Separation of Petroleum Wastes
Method 3620A: Flortott Column Cleanup
Method 3630A: Silica Gel Cleanup
Method 3640: Gel-Permeation Oeanup
Method 36SOA: Acid-Base Partition
Cleanup
Method M60A: Sulfur Cleanup
4.3 DetemiMtion of Organic Anahrte*
4.3.1 GasOuoinatctm&kMethads
Method 8010A: Halogeneted Volatile
Organics by Gas Chromatography
Method 8011:1^-pttnsaoethaae and 14-
and Electrolytic Conductivity Detectors
n Technique
Method 8030A: Acralein and ActykmitrUe
in Series: Capillary Column
Method 8080: Organ
andPCBs
Method 8090: Nitre)
Ketones
chlorine Pesticides
sties and Cyclic
Method 8100: Polynudear Aromatic
HydroCeUtxins
Method 8110: Haloethers by Gas
Chromatography
Method 8120: Chlorinated Hydrocarbons
Method 8140: Organophosphorus
Pesticides
Method 6141: Organophosphorus
Compounds by Gas Chromatography:
Capillary Column Technique
Method 8150A: Chlorinated Herbicides by
Gas Chromatography
4.3.2 Gas Chromatographic/Mass
Spectroscopic Methods
Method 8240A: Volatile Organics by Gas
Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry
(GC/MS)
Method 8250: Gas Chromatography/Mass
Spectrometry far Semivolatiie Organics:
Packed Column Technique
Method 8260: Volatile Organic Compounds
by Gas Chromatography/Mass
Spectrometry (GC/MS): Capillary
Column Technique
Method 8270A: Semivolatiie Organic
Compounds by Gas Chromatography/
Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS): Capillary
Column Technique
Method 8280: The Analysis of
Polycblorinated Dibenzo-p-Dtaxins and
Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans
Appendix A: Signal-to-Noise
Determination Methods
Appendix B: Recommended Safety and
Handling Procedure, for PCDDt/PCDFf
4.3.3 High Performance Liquid
Chromatographk Methods
Method 8310: Polyr-iclear Aromatic
4.4 Miscellaneous Stzeenlng Methods
Method 3810:
Method 3820: H
»Extraction and
^HEUUtnMfKmUUV
Method 8015A: Nonhalogenated Volatile •
Organics by Gas Chromatography
Method 8020: Aromatic Volatile Organics
Method 8021: Halogenated Volatile by Gar
Chromatography Using Photoionization
Screening of Purgeable Organics
Chapter Fire—Miscellaneous Test Methods
Method 9010A: Total and Amenable
Cyanide
Method 9012: Total and Amenable Cyanide
(Colorimetric. Automated UV)
Method 9013: Cyanide Extraction
Procedun far Solids and Oil*
Method 9020A: Total Organic Helides
(TOX)
Method 9021: Purgeable Organic Halides
(FOX)
Method 9022: Total Organic Halides (TOX)
by Neutron Activation Analysis
Method 9030A: Add-Sohible and Acid-
Insoluble Sulfidee
Method 9031: Bxtractable SuUU
Method 9035: Sulfate (Colorimetric.
Method 9038: Sullste (Colorimetric.
Automated, Methylthymol Blue, AA n)
Method 9038: Sulfate (Turbidimetric)
Method 9080: Total Organic Carbon
Method 9085: PhenoUcs
(SnectfopbotomeMc, Manual 4-AAP
with Distillatkm)
Method 9066: Pbenolk
ttColortmetrtc,
Automated 4-AAP with Distillation)
Method 9087: PhenoUcs
(Spectnphotometric.MBTHwith
Distillation)
-------
/ VoL SB, No. 167 / Tuesday. August 31. 1993 / Rules and Regulations 48043
Method 907ft Total Recoverable Oil and
Grease (Gravimetric. Separatory Funnel
Method 9071: Oil and Grease Extraction
Method for Sludge Samples
Method 9131: Total &IUbna: Multiple ,
Tub* Fermentation Technique
Method 9132: Total Colifbim: Membrsne-
Filter Technique
Method 9200: Nitrate
Method 9250: Chloride (Colorimetric,
Automated Ferricyanide AAI)
Method B25t: Chloride (Colorimetric.
Automated Perricyanlde AAII)
Method 9252: Chloride mtrimetrte.
Mercuric Nitrate)
Method 932ft Radium-228
Chapter Six— Prapertiea
Method 1320: Multiple
Prootdure
Method 1330A: Extraction Procedure tat
Oily Watte*
Method 9040: pHElectrometrlc
Extraction
Method 9041 At pH Paper Method
Method 9050: Specific Conductance
Method 9080'Cation-Exchange Capacity of
Soils (Ammonium Acetate)
Method 9081: Canon-Exchange Capacity of
Soils (Sodium Acetate)
Method 9090A: Compatibility Test far
Wastes and Membrane Liners
Method 9095: Paint Filter Liquids Test
Method 9100: Saturated HydnuUi
Conductivity,
Conductivity,
Method 9310: Grass Alpha and Gross Bet
Method 9315: Alpha-Emitting Radium
Chapter Seven—Introduction and Regulatory
Definitions
7.1 ignitabiiity
7.2 Conosivity
7.3 Reactivity
Test Method to Determine Hydrogen
Cyanide Released from Wastee
Test Method to Determine Hydrogen
Sulfide Released from Wastes
7.4 ToxicityC
Procedure
Chapter Eight—Metht
Chanctaristlcs
8.1 IgnttaWlity
Method 1010: Pensky-Martaos OoasoVCttp
Method for Detenniaiii
Method 1020A: Setaflash
IgnittbUity
Method far Determining Ignilahtilty
8.2 Comsivity
Method 1110: Corrosivity Toward Steal
8J Reactivity
6.4 Toxkity
Method 1310A: Extraction Procedure (BP)
Toxtdty Test Method and Structural
Integrity Test
Method 1311: Twddty Characteristic. '
Leaching Procedure
Chapter Nine— Sampling Plan
9.1 Design and Development
9.2 Irolamec, cioa
Chap* Ten— - -npllng Methods
Met. jdOOlC Modified Method 5
App«dix A: Preparation of XAD-J.
Appendix B; Total Chromariyapharils
drganic Material Analysts
Method 0020: Source;
• Sampliag Systsai (SASS)
.Method 0030: Volatile Organic Sampling,
Train
Chapter Eleven—Ground Water Monitoring
ll.l Background and Objectives
11.2 Relationship to the Regulations and to
Other Documents
11.3 Revisions and Additions
11.4 Acceptable Designs and Practices
11.5 Unacceptable Designs and Practices
Chapter Twelve—Land Treatment
Monitoring
12.1 Background
12.2 Treatment Zone
12.3 Regulatory Definition
12.4 Monitoring and Sampling Strategy
12.5 Analysis
12.9 References and Bibliography
Chapter Thirteen—Incineration
13.1 Introduction
13.2 Rsfulatory Definition
13.3 Waste Characterisation Strategy
13.4 Stock-Gas Effluent Characterization
13.5 AcUfitional Effluent ChartcteriiaUfl
pUn» «tiii
13.6 Selection of
Analysis Met
13.7 References
In compiling the Third Edition of
SW-846, the Agency revised many
methods in the Second Edition,
reprinted some methods from the
Second Edition unaltered (except for
format), and added many new methods.
The Agency requested comments
specifically on the new and revised
methods in its January 23, 1989
comments received by the
Agency on the addition of new methods
and revision of "^ittf^g method]
technical in nature. ~
these comments and
response to signlflc
be round in the
details on
Agency's
its may
document
Agency has
incorporated the majority of the
suggested changes Into the final Update
I package, as described in detail in the
.Some of the
comments raised issues that resulted In
additional proposed technical
qlariflc^rjons set forth in the February 8,
1990. Notice of Data Availability and
Reopening of rnmmant Period. A
i of the comments received on
somexte fr
clarify the
application and
technical details in its methods.
s nifo
the February 8 notice is provided in
section IV qf thi« pFHamhle
C. Methods format
In response to earlier comments, the
Agency proposed to adopt a
standardized ten-part format for all of Its
methods. This formal wu developed by
within EPA to
The Agency did not receive any
substantial comments on thif issue
has therefore revised the SW-848
methods according to the proposed
format.
D. Mandatory Use of Revised Chap
One
The Agency proposed to replace the
existing Chapter One of the Third
Edition with a revised version, and to
make selected Quality Assurance and
Quality Control procedures in the
revised Chapter One mandatory for all
RCRA testing. This proposal was made
to ensure that any date used to make
decisions regarding RCRA compliance
would be of known and documented
quality.
The Agency's proposal to replace
Chapter One of SW-846 with a revised
Chapter One and to require use of
selected sections of Chapter One for all
testing pursuant to Subtitle C of RCRA
was commented on extensively. In
evaluating these comments, the Agency
further revised the proposed Chapter
One end solicited comments on the
revisions on February 8,1990 (55 FR
4440-4445). At that time, the Agency
declared its intention to make all oL
Chapter One mandatory for RCRA,
testing and requested comment <
change. Comments received ii
to the February 8.1990 notice are
discussed below in section IV. As stated
in section IV. the Agency has decided
not to fintlJTif the mandatory use of
Chapter One at tM" time.
I tin
of
IV. Response to Guiuiueuts Frt
February 8.1990 Notice
A. Overview of Notice
On February 8,1990, a Notice of Date
Availability and Reopening of Comment
Period was published in the Federal
Register (SS FR 4440-4445). lamed with
this notice wu a revised Chapter One of
SW-848 entitled "Report on Kfinimum
Criteria to Assure Date Quality"
(document number EPA/330-SW-30-
021). Toe revisions were, toe large
extent, based on comments received on
the January 23.1989 proposal. Hie
Agency requested comments on eleven
topics generally related to quality
control definitions and i
which included the deletion of
appendices ffi end X to 40 CFR \
The notice stated that the Agency was
considering making the revised Chapter
One mandatory far ell RCRA testing.
with thf exclusion of certain reasonable
AAD IflgutUDUuB 99COBDuO^Ut AOUKl ^
the notice. Items B through K of t
section summarize the major i
that wen received and the action taken
by the Agency as a result of those
-------
46044 TederaJ Register / Vol. 58. No. 167 / Tuesday, August 31. 1993 / Rules and Regulations
t
comments. A complete description of all
significant comments and the Agency's
responses may be found iri'the
background document to this
rulemaking.
B. Revised Chapter One
The Agency received many comments
regarding the proposed revisions to
Chapter One and the proposal to make
all of Chapter One mandatory for RCRA
testing. Comments were received
regarding two major issues, which
included: (1) The mandatory use of
Chapter One for all RCRA analyses, and
(2) the apparent discrepancy between
Agency and regulated community
requirements.
Several commenters, primarily
analytical laboratories, objected to the
mandatory use of Chapter One because
they felt it could not be implemented in
practical terms. They pointed out that,
under Chapter One, each project would*
require individual Quality Assurance
Project Plans (QAPjPs) and that a
laboratory taking samples from many
clients could not, in any practical way,
attempt to meet the different QAPjPs for
each client. Furthermore, one
commenter argueu that the laboratory
performing the analyses should not be
required to write different QAPjPs for
each project.
The Agency has noted some
confusion regarding whether it intended
that the responsibility for producing.the
QAPjP lies with the laboratory or the
member of the regulated community
that provides the samples. The Agency
regulated community should be
responsible for ensuring that a QAPjP is
prepared because the burden of
complying with the analytical
requirements in the Agency's hazardous
waste regulations is placed upon
generators, transporters, and owners and
operators of hazardous waste
management facilities, not laboratories
or consultants they may employ. In
addition, the member of the regulated
community is the only one in a position
to know such things as how the data
will be used, what decisions the data
will support, and the required precision
and accuracy of the measurements. The
laboratory performing the measurements
may not be in a position to know these
details. Therefore, the Agency believes
that the member of the regulated
community should be responsible for
the preparation of the QAPjP (i.e.r
selection of the required methods,
accuracy, precision, and sensitivity of
the analysis). This'is no different from
the current situation that prevails in the
laboratory services sector. The
laboratory is responsible for meeting the
reauinments established by the client.
This might require lower detection
•limits or better precision for some .-
projects than for others. The Agency -
recognizes that, in a laboratory
production environment, different
samples with different analytical
requests can present a management
problem. The Agency believes, however.
that laboratories already face such
problems when meeting client needs.
and an able to develop appropriate
solutions.
Other commenters objected to the
mandatory use of the Chapter One QA/
QC procedures for all RCRA testing,
since the Agency does not require the
use of the methods contained in SW-
846 for all RCRA testing. They argued
that Chapter One of SW-848 should not
apply when the methods in SW-846 an
not being used.
In addressing this comment, the
Agency notes the difference between the
mandatory use of an analytical method
and the proposed imposition of
mandatory QC These two items an
distinct and different. The proposed QC
requirements were designed to ensure
that, no matter what method was used,
the resulting data would be of known
and documented quality. The Agency
believes that the regulated community
should be given as much flexibility as
possible in selecting the most cost
effective method for data gathering.
However, no matter what method is
used, the Agency believes that data
must be of a quality sufficient to meet
the requirements of the application. The
proposed QC requirements were
designed to achieve that end.
Based upon the above comments, as
well as others received concerning
whether Chapter One should be
mandatory for all testing, the Agency
has determined that requiring minimum
quality control procedures for all RCRA
testing requires further study. Thus, the
Agency has decided to finalize the
revised Chapter One only as guidance.
In addition. Chapter One provides
guidance as to how data generated using
QA/QC procedures can be assured
through one document, the QAPjP.
However, the Agency believes that
existing documents (Standard Operating
Procedures (SOPs), procedure manuals
or other comparable plans) which fulfill
the Agency's QA/QC recommendations
may be appropriate and more cost-
effective to members of the regulated
community. Therefore, the Agency does
not believe it is necessary for a separate
QAPjP to be prepared for routine
sampling analyses or activities if
comparable documents an available
and referenced.
C. Trace Analysis vs. Macroanalysis
The comments on the Agency's
proposal to include language in SW-846
allowing the analyst latitude regarding
sample size, dilution, concentration and
choice of analytical methodology when
macroanalysis (i.e., analysis of nigh
concentration samples) is performed
were supportive of the Agency's
position.
Therefore, the Agency has provided
latitude for the sample size and/or
sample dilution when macroanalysis is
performed, as discussed in the notice.
Macroanalysis refers to the analysis of
samples in which the amount of the
constituent being tested for exceeds the
normal range covered by the analysis
method. The methods contained in SW-
846 may be used for macroanalysis if
the sample size and/or dilution is
adjusted such that the concentration of
the final sample is in the range covered
by the method. When a smaller sample
is used or when a sample is diluted, the
detection limit for the method will
increase by a corresponding factor. If an
instrumental detection limit for a
particular compound is 10 nanograms
(ng) (i.e., the instrument making the.
measurement can measure 10 ng of
material) and the amount of sample
used for the measurement is l milliliter
(mL), then the corresponding detection
limit, for that sample, is 10 ng/mL or
0.01 parts per million (ppm). If the
sample is diluted to 100 mL and 1 mL
of the diluted material is used for the
measurement, the detection limit will
correspond to 100 times the original
detection limit or 1 ppm. Dilution,
therefore, affects detection limits.
Likewise, if a larger amount of sample
is used for the analysis, the detection
limit is lowered by that factor. However,
the instrumental detection limit remains
at 10 ng regardless of the sample size
used, ffi the case of macroanalysis,
however, this increase in detection limit
is of no consequence as long as the
concentration of the sample is adjusted
to the concentration range covered by
the method. Thus, the following
paragraphs have been added to Chapter
Two, "Choosing the Correct Procedure."
to provide guidance in this area and
explain the limits to which the analyst
must adhere when exercising this
latitude:
The methods presented in SW-846 wen
designed *K*^ttieit sample SJIITM and
concentration procedures toaadnss the
problem of "trace" analyses (<1000 ppm).
and have bean developed for an optimised
working range. These methods are also
applicable to "minor" (WOO ppm—10,000
ppm) and "major" (>10.000 ppm) analyses
as well as to "trace" analyses, through use of
appropriate sample preparation techniques
-------
Federal Register / Vol. 58, No. 167 / Tuesday, August 31. 1993 / Rules and Regulations 46045
that mult in anaiyte concentration within
that optimized range. Such sample
preparation techniques include;
(1) Adjustment of sin of sample prepared
for analysis,
(2) Adjustment of Injection volumes.
(3) Dilution or concentration of sample, '
(4) Elimination of concentration steps
prescribed for "trace" analyses,
(5) Direct infection (of samples to be
analyzed for volatile constituents).
. The performance data presented in each of
these methods were generated from "trace"
analyses, and may not be applicable to
"minor" and "major" analyses. Generally,
extraction efficiency improves as
concentration increases. Caution: Can
should be taken when analyzing samples for
trace analyses subsequent to analysis of
concentrated samples due to the possibility
of cross-contamination.
D. Equipment, Standards and Reagent
Preparation • •
The comments on the Agency's
proposal to include language in SW-848
explicitly permittingsjhe analyst latitude
regarding the choice of glassware,
equipment, and preparation of
standards and reagents for use in SW-
846 test methods were supportive of the
Agency's position. Therefore, the
Agency has added the following
statement to the Disclaimer, at the
beginning of SW-846, and to Chapter
Two allowing this latitude:
Since many types and sizes of glassware
and supplies are commercially available, and
since It is possible to prepare reagents and
standards la many different ways, those
specified in these methods may be replaced
by any similar types as long a* this
substitution does not affect the overall
quality of the analyses.
E. Holding Times
The Agency proposed making «*"
to SW-846 that will also permit the
analyst latitude in the implementation
of holding times and to consider the
results of samples not analyzed within
the specified holding times to be
minimum values.
Although most comments indicated
agreement with the proposal to allow
flexibility for the holding times given hi
SW-846. several commenters believed
that applying the proposed change to
the varied matrices and levels of
The Agency agrees with the first
comment that one cannot conclude a
waste concentration is below a specified
level when the holding time for a
sample of that waste is exceeded, and
the data show the sample concentration
is below the regulatory threshold. The
data can be viewed as providing a
minimum concentration only. If these
data show, however, that the minimum
concentration is above the regulatory
threshold, then one can conclude that
the waste is hazardous. Data generated
after holding times-are exceeded may
only be used to prove a waste is
hazardous, not that the waste is non-
hazardous.
The Agency disagrees with the second
that by adopting this
approach, the analyst is given too much
discretion regarding implementing
holding times, since the data can only
be used as discussed above.
Bend on these comments, the Agency
has Included in Chapter Two of SW-846
• provision for the use of data from
samples after their holding time has
been exceeded for the purpose of
showing a waste has exceeded a
regulatory limit The Agency
emphasizes that analyses performed
after holding times expire will represent
values and will not be
appropriate for demonstrating that a
waste is below a regulatory limit
Holding times must be met whenever
one is demonstrating that the
concentration is less than a regulatory
limit Specifically, the following
paragraph has been added to Chapter
Two:
Samples
cted/analyzed
within the specified holding times for the
result* to be considered reflective of total
concentrations. Analytical data generated
outside of the specified holding times must
be considered to be minimum values only.
Such data may be used to demonstrate that
a waste is hazardous where it shows the
coBcenUatJon of a constituent to be above the
regulatory threshold but cannot be used to
demonstrate that a waste is not hazardous.
F. Repntentativ
The Agency
tii
tripling
edMvei
ii
environmental samples is inappropriate.
Two primary concerns raised by these
commenters regarded: (t) Accurately
answering the question of whether the
threshold was exceeded if the
value" is applied In
situations where the measured
concentration was just below the
regulatory threshold, and (2) abuse of
the- program if the implementation of
to tiie discretion
me* was
of the analyst
templing Specifically, commenters
expressed concern that the Agency was
redefining representative sampling, that
the Agency approach does not take
special sampling problems (i.e., mixed
radioactive and hazardous waste) into
account, and that more guidance Is
needed concerning sampling of high-
volume wastes.
The comments raised by the public
are still under consideration by the
Agency, hi order to address these
comments the Agency will need to issue
Tna
additional guidance. The Agency
intends to issue extensive guidance
covering all aspects of sampling.
including representative sampling. _._
guidance will replace Chapter Nine of
SW-846 and will be proposed and
available for public comment in th
future.
This effort includes consideration of
sampling strategies that can minimize
costs without sacrificing acceptable data
quality for making RCRA decisions. The
on-going work includes identifying
approaches and valid statistical tools for
data evaluation and interpretation. Until
this guidance is available, appropriate
sampling strategies should be decided
on a case-by-case basis utilizing as
guidance Chapter Nine of SW-846 and
the comment responses found in the
background document for this
rulenuking.
G. Analysis ofNonaqueous Liquids for
Elemental Species
Two commenters urged EPA not to
adopt Method C—Bomb, Acid
Digestion, as found in American Society
for Testing and Materials (ASTM)
Method E926-88, "Methods of
Preparing Refuse-Derived Fuel (RDF)
Samples for Analyses of Metals," um
data are available on its applicabilijj
request has been made that, before*
proposed or recommended, the me
should be tested for all of the i
types. One commenter. on the other'
hand, indicated that he or she had
evaluated this method for its ability to
digest oils for metals and found that
"(tlhis work demonstrated that the
method was appropriate for metals of
environmental concern, even though it
is not a complete digestion."
In recommending this method the
Agency relies, to some extent on the
acceptance procedures used by ASTM.
Before ASTM recommends a method for
a particular use, it is evaluated by a
committee composed of experts in that
testing area. If the committee accepts the
method, it is adopted and published by
ASTM. This review process is
scientifically rigorous and ensures the
method is suitable for its intended use.
While ASTM method recommendations
are not binding on the Agency, the
Agency may recognize an ASTM
method as satisfactory.
Since this method Is generally
accepted for hydrocarbon material
ithout a reevaluation or soliciting
information on its applicability is
proper.-given Agency concurrence
regarding the respective ASTM
recommendation and review
procedures. In response to public
comment, however, the Agency
-------
/ VoL M, No. 167 I Tuesday. August 31,1993 / Rules and Regulations
t
evaluated this method, and others, for and therefore has n
determining metals in a limited number
of waste oils. The nmiHft of this study
indicate that the method is adequate for
this purpose. A copy of this study is
contained in a background document •'
accompanying this rule. This study
supports the conclusion of the third
commenter regarding the applicability
of the method for metals in oil analysis.
Furthermore, since waste oil is
generally considered one of the most
difficult matrices, the Agency believes
this method will be applicable to a very
wide range of matrices. No substantive
data was submitted showing that the
method does not work for its intended
application. As a result, the Agency has
chosen to promulgate the method. As
more information Incomes available, the
Agency will update the method to
include performance data for additional,
or mote specific, matrices.
The Agency maintains that methods
used for RGRA-related testing should be
applicable to the specific matrix and
analytes of concern. The Agency
disagrees with the commenters,
however, that testing of the method for
additional nonaqueous matrices is
necessary before the method is
recommended. It is not possible to
validate any method for all matrices of
potential Interest. The method has been
found to produce acceptable results for
metals in oil Users of this method may
wish to validate its use for other
matrices using the QC guidance set forth
in Chapter One of SW-846. (See SW-
846. Chapter One, section 4.4.3
"Laboratory Control Procedures.")
Therefore, the Agency is
incorporating by reference "ASTM
Standard Test Methods for Preparing
Refuse-Derived Fuel (RDF) Semples for
Analyses of Metals." ASTM Standard
E926-88. Test Method C—Bomb. Add
Digestion Method in § 260.11U) ol the
RCRA regulations.
H. Method of Standard Addition* md
Matrix Spikes
The Agency received comments
supportive of the Agency's position that
the method of standard additions (MSA)
be applied when matrix interferences
are suspected. The Agency has and
continues to require MSA for certain
determinations of elemental ^pyfTf In
EP Toxidty and TCLP learhates. far
certain data provided in support of
delisting petitions, for analysis of new
matrices, aad for analysis when matrix
interferences ace present Directions for
applying MSA are found la Method
7000. and have been retained in the
Third Edition of SW-448 and Update L
The Agency believes that matrix
spikes can be useful in detecting bias
related to matrix spikes fai
and in some methods contain
846.
I. Spike Recovery Correction
In the February 8,1980 notice, the
Agency set out its intent to require that
reported values be adjusted for
analytical bias iiting matrix spike
recovery as one of the minimum Quality
Control procedures required for aU
RCRA testing. The purpose of this
requirement was to provide more
accurate data in those situations when
then was a significant analytical bias in
the data due to low recoveries of the
analytes of interest. Many of the
commenters to the February 8.1990
notice indicated that the requirement for
spike recovery correction should not be
mandatory, m particular, a number of
commenters raised questions relative to
the practical aspects of implementation
of the requirement (e.g^ how to add the
spike, how many compounds must be
spiked, how many samples must be
spiked) as well as the burdensome
nature of implementation for wastes
with matrix internal
Wastes with matrix I
require dilution in an attempt to reduce
or eliminate the interferences. As a
result, detection limits could be
elevated and one might not be abte to
determine if a compound of interest to
present below the reguktory threshold.
In addition, utsrraranoas may not
equally affect the sample and the spike.
about bias correction when applied la •
constituent that is poorly recovered
from a sample matrix. In the case of nsro
percent recovery.
> may not be sun
that the laboratory could have detected
the
oftheamlyuiflt
The Agency already hat racogoUed
that spike recovery correction is a
complex issue and that there is a need
for further evaluation and more detailed
guidance on the specific __,__,
implementation procedures. Therefore.
in response to public comment received
on the February 8.1090, Federal
Register notice, m a Federal Register
notice published no November 24.1982
(57 PR 55114), the Agency has already
ffiounced Its decision not to proceed
rule revising the TCLP ($5 FR 28986).
returned the QA proviatans of the TCLP
to those promulgated on March 29,1990
(SS FR 11796). As a result, matrix spike
recoveries must be calculated {as set
forth in revised section 8.2 of the TCLP)
and the method of standard additions
must be employed as the quantitetioa
method for metallic contaminants when
appropriate as specified ia the method
(as set forth in revised section 8.4 of the
TCLP). In addition, the Agency made a
technical correction to the regulatory
language in section 8.4 to specify the
use of initial calibration quantitatioo
methods for metallic contaminants. The
Agency felt this technical correction
was appropriate because, at present, the
method of standard additions is
inapplicable to organic contaminants.
Wastes identified as hazardous through
TOP testing utilizing matrix spike
recovery correLtiuu must be managed as
hazardous wastes, unless and until such
wastes en nevaluated using
recalculations of existing date or the
TCLP test procedun as described in
November 24.1992 rule or otherwise
nevaluated and found to be non-
hazardous.
/.Jteogent Grade Water
Several commenters asked that the
Agency's definition of Reagent Grade
Water be clarified. Specifically, they
requested that the Agency extent
objective limits for defining "reagent
grade water." In response to these
comments the Agency has added
definitions of reagent water and organic-
free reagent water to Chapter One.
Specific details on these definitions may
be found hi the revtesd Chapter One
which provided that far a method blank
to be acceptable, the concentration in
the blank of any anahrto of concern
should be no higher then the highest of
the following:
(1) The method detection Unit.
(2) Five percent of the regulatory limit
for that anelyte, or
(3)Fiv«]
nctionrequinBuntmiUJ
analytical procedures, and has
withdrawn the teouinment far bias
correction of analytical spiked ssmples
from the TOP. The November 24,1982
rule withdrew the epike recovery
correction nquirasnent from the TOP
and organic-free
reagent water will generally provide
acceptable method blanks.
261
ODtbeproDosaJtodeteteA|iinmdJcesm
and X of 40 CFR part 281. AU were in
favor of deleting Appendix X but
changes made In a June 29.1990. final
The) Aajaney baa chosen to proceed
with removal of Appendix X of Part 261
as proposed in the Notice. The Agency
has also decided to proceed with
-------
Federal Register / Vol. 58. No. 167 / Tuesday, August 31. 1993 / Rules and Regulations 46047
revising Appendix HI of part 261
whereby Tables 1 through 3 an
nmoved and a note is added nferencing
the reader to SW-846. The information
contained in the tables of Appendix m,
"Chemical Analysis Test Methods", is -
provided in SW-846 Third Edition.
Chapter Two, "Choosing the Cornet
Procedun." This chapter can be used in
place of the tables of Appendix OL
Removal of the appendix tables does not
change the methods that an to be used
in a given situation.
Since Appendix m of part 261 is
being revised to refer to SW-846 and
since §§260.22(d)(l)(i) and
270.l9(c)(l)(iii) reference that appendix,
those sections an also being revised to
instead reference SW-846.
V. Technical Changes
The Agency is taking this opportunity
to make several technical changes
resulting from adoption of the Third
Edition of SW-848 and correcting minor
technical errors. These changes include:
• Revising appendix not part 281 by
deleting the Toxidty Characteristic
[Caching Procedun (TCLP), and adding
a note nfenndng the TCLP, Method
1311 found in SW-646; and revising
§ 261.24 by removing the reference to
the TCLP found in appendix H, and
adding in its place a reference to SW-
846 Method 1311.
* Revising appendices I and DC of part
268. by delating the reference to the
TCLP found in appendix n, part 261
from appendix I of part 268 and delating
the EP Toxidty Test. Method 1310 from
appendix K of part 268 and adding
notes respectively nfenndng the TCLP,
Method 1311 and the EP. Method 1310
found in SW-846; and revising
references to appendix n of put 261 and
appendix DC of part 268 in §§ 268.7(a),
268.40(a) and 268.41(a) to instead
reference SW-486 Methods 1311 and
1310.
• Deleting the Liquid Release Test,
Method 9096 from SW-846 Third
Edition and Pint Update.
• Removing the 47 analytical test
methods incorporated by nference in
§260.ii(a).
• Deleting references to equivalent
methods in §§ 261.22(a) (1) and (2) and
261.24(a).
• Deleting the reference to Method
5.2 in $ 28l.22(a)(l) and adding in its
place the reference to Method 9040.
• Adding clarification that references
to SW-846 in §S 264.190(a). 264.314(c).
26S.190(a). 265.314(d). 270.19{c)(lKiii)
and (iv), 270.62(b)(2)(i)(Q and (D), and
270.66(c)(2)(i) and (ii) an to SW-846 as
Incorporated by reference in $ 260.11
• Revising §270.6 to cross nference
$260.11
Since these en **rktil*?*l changes that
do not affect the Implementation of the
regulations, the Age&rj simply
notice of tr. - ranges without
ty forcomn:- _t. These
an discussed in detail below.
A. Revising Appendix tt of Pott 361 by
Deleting the Toxidty Characteristic
Leaching Procedure (TCLP), and Adding
Reference to the TCLP, SW-846 Method
1311 to Appendix n and § 261J4.
The TCLP is being removed from
with a note referencing SW-846 because
th<« method is contained in the Third
Edition of SW-846 (i.e.. Method 1311)
and then is no need to maintain
multiple copies of this method (one in
appendix n of part 261 and one
incorporated by reference) in the
regulations. This technical change is
being undertaken to eliminate
redundancy and to remove the
possibility that a discrepancy might
exist between two versions of the
method. This revision only changes
when the method is found. It does not
change the content or intended use of
the method. Since ***** is clearly a
farhnlCfJ riianaa, the Agency is making
this change without notice and
red from
Since the TCLP is being
appendix n and replaced with a note
referencing SW-846. and § 261.24 refers
to appendix H, $ 261.24 is being revised
to also nfar to Method 1311 in SW-846.
B. Renting Appendices I and DC of Part
268 by Deleting the Reference to the
TOP Found in Appendix O, Part 261,
From Appendix I of Part 268 and
Deleting the SP Toxidty Tea From
Appendix DC of Part 268; and Adding
Reference to the TOP. SW-846 Method
1311 and the EP, SW-846 Method 1310
in the Respective Appendices and in
§§ 268.no}. 268.40(a) and 268.41(a).
Since the TCLP is being nmoved from
appendix U. part 261 ano replaced with
a note referencing SW-846 Method
1311. and since appendix I of part 268
and SS268.7U), 268.40(a) and 268.41(a)
nfer to appendix n of part 261*
appendix t part 268 and §§ 268.7(a),
266.40(a) and 268.4l(a) an being
revised to also refer to Method 1311 in
SW-646.
The Extraction Procedun (EP)
Toxidty Test is also being nmoved
from appendix DC of part 266 and
replaced with a note nferencing SW-
846 because the method is contained in
the Third Edition of SW-846 (/.«..
Method 1310). and than is DO need to
•niin**** multiple copies of this method
(one in appendix DC of part 268 and one
incorporated by Reference) in the
regulations. This revision only changes
when the method is found. It does i
change the content or intended use!
the method.
Since the EP is being removed fror
appendix IX of part 268 and repl
with a note nferencing SW-846 Ml
1310, and since §§ 268.7(a) and
268.40(a) refer to this appendix.
S§ 268.7(a) and 268.40{a} are also being
revised to refer to Method 1310 in SW-
646.
C. Deleting the Liquid Release Test.
Method 9096 From SW-846 Third
Edition and Update I
The Liquid Release Test. SW-846
Method 9098, was included in SW-846
Third Edition and Update I
inadvertently. It was not EPA's
intention to include the Liquid Release
Test in that publication, since Method
9098 has not yet been proposed. EPA is.
therefore, deleting Method 9096 from
SW-846 Third Edition and Update I. It
is the Agency's intention to propose
Method 9096 as part of Update n to
SW-646.
D. Removing the 47 Analytical Test
Methods Incorporated by T
§260.11(a)
The Agency is today removing
lethods incorporated by nferen
§ 260.11(a). This action is being taken
since the 47 methods an contained in
the Third Edition of SW-646, which is
being incorporated by reference today in
its entirety. Therefore, specific nference
to the 47 methods is redundant and is
being nmoved.
E. Deleting References to Equivalent
Methods in §§ 261.22(aKl) and (2) and
261.24(a)
The Agency notes that anyone may
petition to add an equivalent testing or
analytical method to SW-846 for use in
the RCRA program under provisions of
§$ 260.20 and 260.21 of these
regulations. Because these provisions
have always been available to the
public, in today's rule the Agency is
removing nfennces to equivalent
methods in $5 26l.24(a).
F. Deleting the Reference to
in§261.22(aKl) and Adding in
the Reference to Method 9040
i
The EPA method number for pH is
incorrectly nfennced in § 261.22(a)(l)
as Method 5.2. Therefore, the Afiflfcl i'
deleting the reference to Method^K
that section and replacing it with me
correct reference to Method 9040.
-------
46048 Federal Register / Vol. 58. No. 167 / Tuesday. August 31. 1993 / Rule* and Regulation*
t
G. Adding Clarification that References
to SW-446 in $$264.19
-------
Federal Register / Vat 58, No. 167 / Tuesday. August 31, 1993 I Rules and Regulations 46049
head of the Agency certifies that the rub
will not have * significant impact OD •
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will not require the
pindiiM of new instruments or'
equipment The regulation require* DO
new reports beyond those now required:
This run will not have an adverse
economic impact on small entities sine*
its effect will be to provide greater
flexibility to all of the regulated
community, including small entities.
Therefore, in accordance with S U.S.G
section 605(b). I hereby oartify that this
rule win not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities (as defined by
the Regulatory Flexibility Act). Thus,
the regulation does not require an RFA,
C Paperwork Redaction Act
There are no additional reporting.
notification, or ncordkeeping
provisions in this rule. Such provisions,
were they included, would be submitted
for approval to the Office of
Management end Budget (OMB) under
the Paperwork Reduction Act. 44 U.S.C
3501 et sea.
List of Subjects n 40 CFE Parts 2tt.
261,284,265,208, and 270.
Administrative practice end
Incorporation by reference. Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: August 24, 1993.
For toe leetons set out IB the
preamble, title 40, chapter I of the Code
of Federal Regulations k amended as set
forth below:
PAHT260 HAZARDOUS WASTE
MANAGEMENT SYSTI
LTheeuthoritj
continues to i
AnwefStv: 42 UAC. 6606.6M2M,
6927, 6930.6*34.6935,6037,6836,6930,
and 6974.
Subpart B-OeflnWoiw
2. Section 260.11W k amended by
revising the "Test Methods for
Evaluating Solid Waste. Physical/
Chemical Methods" reference; by
adding ASTM Method £926-68 to the
endttthebstofmoarpontionby
reference publicatione; by removing the
undesignated paragraph following the
list of incorporation by nsmoce
pubUcetione, which rates to the 47
analytical testing methods sad its
footnote 1, to reed ae Inflows:
1260.11
-Test Methods for Evaluating Sottd Method, for Evaluating Solid Waste.
u— »w_._urt—,~i iZ^i.., Physical/Chemical Methods." EPA
Publicati
W_ .
EPA Publication SW-846 (third Edition
{September, 1986), as *•«••**•«* by -
Update I (July 1992)). The Third Edition
of SW-846 and Update 1 (document
number 955-001-00000-1) ere available
from the Superintendent of Documents.
U.S. Government Printing Office,
Washington. DC 20402, (202) 783-3238.
Conies may be inspected at the Library
andRCRA Docket No. F-83-WTMF-
FPFFF, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, 401M Street. SW.. Washington.
DC 20480.
• * • • •
"ASTM Standard Test Methods for
Preparing Refuse-Derived Fuel (RDF)
Samples for Analyses of Metals," ASTM
Standard £928-88. Test Method C—
Bomb. Add Digestion Method, available
from American
Materials, 1918 Race
Philadelphia, PA 19103.
3. Section 260.22(dKlXi) to "vised to
read as follows:
|26(U2 Petnone to emend part 261 to
(!)•**
(i) Does not
constituents (as denned in Appendix
VH of pert 281 of this chapter} that
caused the Administrator to net the
waste, using the appropriate test
methods prescribed in Test Methods
for Evaluating SoHd Waste. Physical/
rhemicel Methods," EPA Fubhcetion
SW-448. ae incorporated by reference in
$260.11; or
?Un 2t1-DOiTnCATION AND
USTMG OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
4. The authority dtetton far pert 261
fonTiniien to read av
Amhectty:42
(22. and 6998.
42U.SJC
6922,
6M2M.6921.
• S. Section aaiJZ to
revising pengn
(a)(2)tonedae
1261.22
(1) Rb aqueous end bee a nB less
thanorequalto2orgreetsrtnener
equal to 123, ae determined by a pH
r usfag Method 9040 ta-Test
ion SW-846. as
reference in S 260.11 of this
(2) ft is e liquid and corrodi
steel
(SAE1020) at a rate greater than 6.35^
mm (0.250 inch) per year at a test
temperature of 55*C (130*F) as
determined by the test method specif
in NACE (National Association of
Corrosion Engineers) Standard TM-01-
69 as standardized in 'Test Methods for
Evaluating Solid Waste. Physical/
Chemical Methods." EPA Publication
SW-846. as incorporated by reference in
§ 260.11 of this chapter.
6. Section 261.24(a) is revised to read
as follows:
1261.24 Toaictty characteristic.
(a) A solid waste exhibits the
characteristic of toxidty if. using the
Toxkity Characteristic leeching
Procedure, test Method 1311 in "Test
Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste.
Physical/Chemical Methods," EPA
Publication SW~446, as incorporated by
reference in $ 260.11 of this chapter, the
extract from a representative sample of
the waste contains any of the
contaminants listed in table 1 at the
concentration equal to or greater I
the respective value given in net I
Where the waste contains less 1
percent filterable solids, the waste J
after filtering using the i
outlined in Method 1311, is cons
to be the extract for the purpose of this
section.
7. Appendix H to pert 261 is revised
to read as follows:
AppendixBtoP«rtlll lldamii 1331
(TOP)
Most: The TOP (Method 1311) i*
published in 'Test Methods tor evaluating
Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods."
EPA Publication SW-846/ft* incorporated by
nfaence in $ 260.11 of this chapter.
8. Appendix ID to part 281 iunviaed
to reed as follows:
Appendix in te Part
AkalysisTeet ~
NdterAppmprl
alyticai procedtttes to
toxic constiniettt an
Two. "CaoociBtuie Correct I
found m'Test Methods fer I
Waste. PhysiealMaiemicai Methods."
Publication SW-446*as teononted by
lefBfeaot in S 26o.ll of mis chapter. Prior to
final)
ipedac section or
646 far additional guidance ee>
approved methods thovM be •
specific sample analysis sttuetion.
-------
48080 Federal Register / VoL 58, No. 167 / Tuesday, August 31. 1993 / Rules and Regulations
9. Appendix X to part 281 is removed.
PART 264—STANDARDS POD
\ OWNERS AND OPERATORS OF
HAZARDOUS WASTE TREATMENT.
STORAGE, AND DISPOSAL
FACILITIES
10. The authority citation for part 264
continues to read as follows: .
Authority: 42 U.S.C 6905.6912(t), 6924,
and 692$.
Subpart J—Tank Systems
11. Section 264.190 is amended by
revising the last sentence of paragraph
(a) to read as follows:
1264.190 Applicability.
• • * * •
(a) * * * To demonstrate the absence
or presence of free liquids in the stored/
treated waste, the following test must be
used: Method 9095 (Paint Filter Liquids
Test) as described in "Test Methods for
Evaluating Solid Waste. Physical/
Chemical Methods," EPA Publication
SW-848. as incorporated by reference in
§ 260.11 of this chapter.
Subpart N—Landfills
12. Section 264.314 is amended by
sing paragraph (c) to read as follows:
and containerized liquids.
* • • * •
(c) To demonstrate the absence or
presence of free liquids in either a
containerized or a bulk waste, the
following test must be used: Method
9095 (Paint Filter Liquids Test) as
described in "Test Methods for
Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/
Chemical Methods," EPA Publication
SW-846. as incorporated by reference In
§260.11 of this chapter.
PART 26S—INTERIM STATUS
STANDARDS FOR OWNERS AND
OPERATORS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
TREATMENT, STORAGE, AND
DISPOSAL FACILITIES
13. The authority dtation for part 265
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C 6905,6912(a). 6924.
.6935, and 6936.
Subpart J—Tank Systems
14. Section 265.190 is amended by
revising the last sentence of paragraph
(a) to read as follows:
285.190
*
(•) * * * To demonstrate the absence
or presence of free liquids in the stored/
treated waste, the following test must be
used: Method 9095 (Paint Filter Liquids.
Test) as-described in "Test Methods for*
Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/
Chemical Methods," EPA Publication
SW-846. as incorporated by reference in
§ 260.11 of this chapter.
Subpart N—Landfills
15. Section 265.314 is amended by
revising paragraph (d) to read as
follows:
i for bulk
I2S&314 Specie! require
and containerized liquids.
(d) To demonstrate the absence or
presence of free liquids in either a
containerized or a bulk waste, the
following test must be used: Method
9095 (Paint Filter Liquids Test) as
described in "test Methods for
Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/
Chemical Methods," EPA Publication
SW-846, as incorporated by reference in
$260.11 of this chapter.
PART 268-LAND DISPOSAL
RESTRICTIONS
16. The authority citation for part 288
continues to read as follows:
Attfheritp 42 U.S.C. 6905.6912M, 6921.
and 6924.
Subpart A—General
17. Section 268.7 is amended by
revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
1286.7 Wa
elysta
(a) Except as spedfied in $ 268.32. if
a generator's waste is listed in 40 CFR
part 261. subpart D, the generator must
test his waste, or test an extract using
the Toxidty Characteristic Leaching
Procedure. Method 1311 in "Test
Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,
" deal/Chemical Methods," EPA
t SW-846, as incorporated by
reference in § 260.11 of this chapter. or
use knowledge of the waste, to
determine if the waste is restricted from
land disposal under this part. Except as
specified in S 268.32, if a generator's
waste exhibits one or more of the
characteristics set out at 40 CFR part
261, subpart C, the generator must test
an extract using the Extraction
Procedure Toxidty Test Method 1310
in 'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid
Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods,"
EPA Publication SW-846, as
lated by reference in S 260.11 of
; or use knowledge of the
waste, to determine if the waste is
restricted from land disposal under this
part. If the generator determines that
this waste displays the characteristic of
ignitability (D001) (and is not in the
High TOG Ignitable Liquids Subcategory
or is not treated by INQN. FSUBS. or
RORGS of § 268.42, Table 1), or the
characteristic of corrosivity (D002). and
is prohibited under § 268.37. the
generator must determine what
underlying hazardous constituents (as
defined in § 268.2) are reasonably
expected to be present in the D001 or
D002 waste.
Subpart D—Treatment Standards
18. Section 268.40 is amended by
revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
12*140 Applicability of treatment
this
(a) A restricted waste identified in
S 268.41 may be land disposed only if
an extract of the waste or of the
treatment residue of the waste
developed using Method 1311, the
Toxidty Characteristic Leaching
Procedure does not exceed the value
shown in Table CCWE of S 268.41 for
any hazardous constituent listed in
Table CCWE for that waste, with the
following exceptions: D004. D008.
K031, K084. K101, K102. P010. P011.
P012. P036. P038, and U136. These
wastes may be land disposed only if an
extract of the waste or of the treatment
residue of the waste developed using
either Method 1310, the Extraction
Procedure Toxidty Test, or Method
1311, the Toxidty Characteristic
Leaching Procedure, does not exceed
the concentrations shown in Table
CCWE of S 268.41 for any hazardous
constituent listed in Table CCWE for
that waste. Methods 1310 and 1311 an
both found in 'Test Methods for
Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/
Chemical Methods," EPA Publication
SW-846, as incorporated by reference in
$ 260.11 of this chapter.
19. Section 268.41 is amended by
revising paragraph (a) introductory text
to read as follows:
J28M1 Treatment standards expressed
(a) Table CCWE identifies the
restricted wastes and the concentrations
of their associated constituents which
may not be exceeded in the extract of a
waste or waste treatment residual
extracted using Method 1311, the
Toxidty Characteristic Leaching
Procedure, for the allowable land
disposal of such wastes. Compliance
-------
/ VoL 58. No. 167 / Tueeday. August 31. 1993 / llutea and Regulations 48091
Withthawi
bawd upon gob aanmise. Method 1311
is found in 'Tot Method* far
Evaluating SftUd Waste, Physk
Chemical Methods." EPA Pubfc
SW—846, as ftncorpontsd by reference bt
S 260.11 oftMsriiepttir.
**••**
20. Appendix 1 to pat 268 is revised
to read as follows:
StU
I to Plrt
Toxicfiy
(tCLF)
Note: the TCLP (Method 1311] is
In Test Methods for f
s. PhrsiealA2iemical I
EPA Pubikstion SW-846. as incorporated by
reference in §260.11 of tote chapter.
21. Appendix DC to part 269 is revised
to read as follows:
Appendix DC to Part 26ft—Extractfcm
Procedure (EP)Texkfcy Teal Matted a*4
Stractnral Inlacrity Test (Method 1310)
MOCK Tke D» (Method 1310) Is pobushed
in Test Methods in EvaluatingSolId Waste,
PbvricaVCbeinical Methods.'* fi»A
Publication SW-846. as inoraontsd by
reference in S 260.11 of On* chapter.
PART 270-EPA AOMM81
PERMIT PROGRAMS: THE
HAZARDOUS WASTE PERMIT
PROGRAM
22. Tba authority citation for part 270
continues to rwd as follows:
Andurity: 42 U^.C MOS. 6*12, W34,
8925.9K9, «S3».M>dt»74.
Subpart A Can»«llnfocmatloo
23. Section 270.6fa) Is ftjvted to taad
asfoUows:
I270J
M Whan uMdfaa part 270 of tfai*
chapter, the following publications an
incorporated by nfnancft (See 40 CFR
260.11 Rafenoca*)
24. Section 270.19 Is amended by
(cKiKiO), and bv reviling paragraph
(c){l)(iv) to read as follows:
1270.19 SpeoffiepetlBlnfomwlion
requkeinentafarl
(c) • • •
(I)*'*
(iii) * • • The waste analysis must
rely on analytical techniques specified
in "Test Methods far Evaluating Solid
Waste. Physical/Chemical Methods."
EPA Publication SW-846, as
incorporated by reference in § 260.11 of
this chapter and § 270.6, or their
equivalent. ^
(iv) An approximate quantification of
the hazardous constituents identified in
the waste, within the precision
produced by the analytical methods
specified in Test Methods for
Evaluating Solid Waste. Physical/
Chemical Methods." EPA Publication
SW-846. as incorporated by reference in
S 260.11 of this chapter and $ 27QA.
• • • • •
Subpart F-Spectal Forma of PernuU
25. Section 270.62 is amended by
revising the last fftitp*?* of paragraph
(b)(2)(i)(C), and by revising paragraph
(b)(2)(iKD) to read at folknrr
I270JC2 llaiaiiliiiaiaiaaiibiieiaiaiiii
B:'::
•"The waste analysis must rely
ninnti
•Test Methods far EvaJu
Waste. PI
EPA Publication SW-846. aa
incorpontadbyi*JaranceinS260.llof
this chapter and §270.6, or i
equivalent.
(D) An approximate quantifies!
the hazardous constituents identifie
the waste, within the precisian
produced by the analytical methc
specified in "Test Methods for
Evaluating Solid Waste. Physical/
Chemical Methods." EPA Publication
SW~446, es incorporated by reference in
$ 260.11 of this chapter and § 270.6. or
their equivalent.
26. Section 270X6 is amended by
revising the last sentence of paragraph
(c)(2Mi). and by revising paragraph
(cX2)(ii) to read as follow*
1270.66 Permits for boilers end Industrial
furnaces turning hazardous waste.
(c) • • •
(21* • *
(i)" * • The) waste analysis must be
conducted in accordance with analytical
techniques specified in 'Test Methods
for Evaluating Solid Waste. Physical/
Chemical Method*," EPA Publication
SW-846, as incorporated by i
S 260.11 of this chapter and § 270.1
their equivalent
(ii) An approximate i
the hazardoos constituents identif
the hazardous waste, within the
precision produced by the analytical
methods specified in 'Test Methods for
Evaluating Solid Wast*. Physical/
Chemical Methods." EPA PnbHcrtion
5Wr^^*lw». fltt I&COfpOWtflu By JWBI9RC91&
$ 260.11 of this chapterand § 270.6. or
Outer oquivsBRiT.
• • ' • • *
(PR Doc. 09-41114 Filed 8-26-93; MS aat)
-------
t
Monday
September 19, 1904
Part If
Environmental
Protection Agency
40 CFR Part 268
Hazardous Waste Management System;
Testing and Monitoring Activities, Land
Disposal Restrictions Correction; Final
Rule
40 CFR Parts 148, et at
Land Disposal Restrictions Phase II—
Universal Treatment Standards, and
Treatment Standards for Organic Toxicity
Characteristic Wastes and Newly Listed
Wastes; Final Rule "
-------
47980 Federal Register / Vol. 59, No. 180 / Monday, September 19. 1994 / Rules and Regulations
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 268
fFRt-«r70-ai
Hazardous Waste Management
System; Testing and Monitoring
ActMttes, Lsnd Disposal Restrictions
AQENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION; Final role; correction.
SUMMARY: This action corrects die final
regulations which wen published
Tuesday, August 31,1993 ("Hazardous
Waste Management System; Testing and
Monitoring Activities; Final Rule". 58
PR 46040). This action corrects die
unintended removal of text from 40 CFR
26B.7(a), which sets out die generator
waste analysis and recordkeeping
requirements of die land disposal
restrictions under Subtitle C of die
Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act of 1976 (RCRA). as amended.
EFFECTIVE DATE: This action is effective
as of August 31,1993.
FOR FURTHER ^FORMATION CONTACT: For
further information about tiiis correction
contact Kim Kirkland at (202) 260-4761.
Office of Solid Waste (Mailcode 5304).
US. Environmental Protection Agency,
401M Street. SW.. Washington, DC
20460. For information about 40 CFR
268.7(a) requirements, contact die RCRA
Hotline on (800) 424-9346 (toll-free) or,
in die Washington, DC metropolitan
area, (703) 412-9810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The final regulations that are die
subject of tiiis correction (August 31,
1993.58 FR 46040) amended tiw
hazardous waste regulations for testing
and monitoring activities by replacing
dn Second Edition. Updates I and 0. of
die EPA approved test methods manual
•Test Methods for Evaluating Solid
Waste. Physical/Chemical Metiiods."
EPA Publication SW-846, by
incorporating by reference die Third
Edition of SW-846 and its Update 1 Mto
S 260.11(a) of die RCRA regulations. In
addition, die final rule also made a
technical amendment to § 268.7(a)
(concerning waste analysis and
recordkeeping requirements) whereby
die reference to die appendix DC of Part
268 was revised to reference SW-846
Methods 1311 and 1310. The Agency
intended to revise only die introductory
text of $ 268.7(a) and to retain without
change all of die subparagraphs
following die introductory text.
However, due to an inadvertent
administrative error in incorporating the
August 31.1993 rule into the 1994
edition of the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR). the subparagraphs
following the introductory text were
unintentionally removed. This action
clarifies that subparagraphs 40 CFR
268.7(a)(l)-268.7(a)(10), as set forth in
this action, remain in effect, arid are
regarded by EPA to have been in effect
continuously in the form published in
the Code of Federal Regulations revised
as of July 1,1993.
It should be noted that 40 CFR
268.7(a) as published in this action, as
well as other regulations implementing
the land disposal restriction (LDR)
program, have been amended in a final
rule that is published elsewhere in
today's Federal Register. The regulatory
text set forth in this action does not
include the amendments to S 268.7(a)
made by that LDR final rule. The
purpose of this action is to make clear
that die August 31.1993 rule was
intended only to modify die
introductory text of 5 268.7(a). and was
not intended to delete paragnphs1a)(l)-
(a)(10). Therefore, die complete version
of S 268.7(a) as it should ham appeared
since die August 31,1994 Federal
Register is set forth in this action.
Readers are urged to refer to die LDR
final rule, published elsewhere in
today's Federal Register, for die full and
current text of S 268.7(a).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 268
Environmental protection. Hazardous
waste. Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: August 30,1994.
Acting A*»totaM Administrator. Office of
Solid Waste end Emergency Respovue.
Therefore, for die reasons set forth in
die preamble. 40 CFR part 268 is
corrected by making die following
correcting amendments:
PART 268-
RESTP"""
I DISPOSAL
1. The authority citation for part 268
continues to read as follows:
Auttorily: 42 U.S.C 8905. 6912U). 6921,
sod 6924. • ,
2. Section 268.7(a) is revised to mad
as follows:
Uf^AkA a«i»ii.^la mn tt •
wssis analyst* ana
(a) Except as specified in S 26842. if
a generator's waste is listed in 40 CFR
. pan 261. subpart D, die generator must
test his waste, or test an extract using
die Tdxicity Characteristic Leaching
Procedure, Method 1311 in "Test
Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste.
Physical/Chemical Methods." EPA
Publication SW-846. as incorporated by
reference in § 260.11 of this chapter, or
use knowledge of die waste, to
determine if the waste is restricted from
land disposal under this part. Except as
specified in $ 268.32 of this part, if a
generator's waste exhibits one or more
of die characteristics set out at 40 CFR
part 261, subpart C, die generator must
test an extract using die Extraction
Procedure Toxicity Test. Metitod 1310
in "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid
Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods."
EPA Publication SW-846, as
incorporated by reference in S 260.11 of
this chapter, or use knowledge of die
waste, to determine if die waste is
restricted from land disposal under this
Part. If die generator determines that his
waste displays die characteristic of
ignitability (D001) (and is hot in die
High TOC Ignitable Liquids Subcategory
or is not treated by INuN. FSUBS, or
RORGS of $ 268.42. Table 1), or die
characteristic of conosivity (D002), and
is prohibited under $ 268.37 of this Part.
die generator must determine what
underlying hazardous constituents (as
defined in $ 268.2). are reasonably
expected to be present in die D001 or
D002 waste.
(l) If a generator determines that he is
managing a restricted waste under this
part and die waste does not meet die
applicable treatment standards set forth
in Subpart D of this part or exceeds die
applicable prohibition levels set forth in
§ 266.32 or RCRA section 3004(d). with
each shipment of waste die generator
must notify die treatment or storage
facility in writing of the appropriate
treatment standards set forth in Subpart
D of tiiis part and any applicable
prohibition levels set forth in S 268.32
or RCRA section 3004(d). The notice
must include die following information.
(i) EPA Hazardous Waste Number;
(ii) The corresponding treatment
standards for wastes F001-F005, F039.
wastes prohibited pursuant to S 268.32
or RCRA section 3004(d). and for
underlying hazardous constituents (as
defined in S 268.2). in D001 and D002
wastes if diose wastes are prohibited
under $ 268.37. Treatment standards for
all other restricted wastes must either be
included, or be referenced by including
on die notification die applicable
wastewater (as defined in §268.2(1)) or
nonwastewater (as defined in § 268.2(d
category, the applicable subdivisions
made within a waste code based on
waste-specific criteria (such as D003
reactive cyanides), and die CFR
section(s) and pangnph(s) where the
applicable treatment standard appears
Where the applicable treatment
I
-------
federal Register / Vol. SOt, No. 180 / Monday, September 19, 1994 / Rules and Regulations 47981
B SpHHDiMMl
technok>gies in $28*42. the applicable
five-teter treatment code found in Table
1 of § 26*42 (&». HION. WETCBt) also
must be luted on the notificatiocc
(m>Tben»»ife*ntiniber associated
with the shipment of waste;
(iv) For hazardous debris, the-
contaminants subject to treatment as
provided by §28&4S(b) and the
following statement: "This hazardous
debris is suDject to tne alternative
treatment standards of 40 CFR 268.45":
and
(v) Waste analysis data, where
available.
(2) If a generator determines that be is
managing a restricted waste under this
Part, and determines thai the waste can
be land disposed without further
treatment, with each shipment of waste
he must submit, to the treatment.
storage, or land disposal facility, a
notice and a certification stating that the
waste meets the applicable treatment
standards set forth in subperf D of this
part and the applicable prohibitioR
levels set forth in $268.32 or RCRA
section 30O4(d). Generators of
hazardous debris that is excluded from
the definition of hazardous waste under
$ 26l.3(e)f 2} of this chapter (i.e.. debris
that the Director has determined does
not contain hazardous waste), however.
not subject to these notification and
tification requirements.
(i) The notice must include the
following information:
(A) EPA Hazardous Waste Number.
(B> The corresponding treatment^
standards for wastes FOOl-FD05» FOOT.
and wastes prohibited pursuant to
§ 268.32 or RCRA section 3004fd).
Treatment standards for all other
restricted wastes must either be
included, or be referenced by including
on the notification the applicable
wastewaler (as defined in $ 268.2(0) or
nonwastewater (as defined in $268.2(4)1
category, the applicable subdivisions
made within a waste code based en
waste-specific criteria (such as DM3
reactive cyanides), and the CFR
sectkm(s) and paragraph^) where tiw
applicable treatment standard appears.
Where the applicable treatment
standards are expressed «s spanned
technologies in §268.42. the applicable
five-letter treatment coda found in Table
1 of § 268.42 (e-g.. WON. WETCOt) also
must be listed on the notification-
(C) The manifest number associated
with the shipment of waste;
(O) Waste analysis data, when
available.
(ii) The certification must Designed
l«v an authorized representative and
:• \\Kt state the following:
I certify neater pmeky of kwthetl
penonatty •ateewaniiMd inrt aim familiar
with tiw waste Ihraugh analysis aad testing
or through knowtedgs of the waste to support
this certification that the wasta complies
with the treatment standards specified m4O
CFR Part 288, Sofcpaxt Dead all applicable
prohibition* eel forth in 40 CFR 168.32 or
RC8A section 3004(*). I believe that the
information 1 submitted is trua.-accuiate and
complete. I am aware that there are
significant penalties for submitting a false
certification, including the possibility of a
fine and imprisonment
(3) If a generator's waste is subject fo
an exemption from a prohibition on the
type of land disposal method utilized
for the waste (such as, but not limited
to. a case-by-case extension under
§ 268.5.80 exemption under § 2616. or
a nationwide capacity variance under
subpart C of this part), with each.
shipment of waste he most submit a
notice to the facility receiving bis i
stating that the waste is not prohibited
from land disposal. Tne notice must
include the following information:
(i) EPA Hazardous Waste Number.
(ii) The corresponding treatment
standards for wastes F001-FD05. F03t*.
and wastes prohibited pursuant to
S 268.32 or RCRA section 3004(d).
Treatment standards for all other
restricted wastes must either be
included, or be referenced by including
on the notification the applicable
wastewater (as defined in S 268.2(0) or
nonwastewater (as defined in $268.2(d))
category, the applicable subdivisions
made withra a waste code based on
waste-specific criteria (such as D003
reactive cyanides), and the CFR
section's) and paragraph's) where the
applicable treatment standard appears.
Where the applicable treatment
standards are expressed as specified
technologies in 5 268.42. the applicable
five-letter treatment code found in Table
1 of § 268.42 (e-g.. INON. WETOX) also
must be listed on the notification;
(iii) The manifest number associated
with the shipment of waste;
(iv) Wast* analysis data, where
available:
(v) For hazardous debris, the
containments subject to treatment as
provided by §268.45(b) and the
following statement: "This hazardous
debris is subject to the alternative
treatment standards of 4O CFR 268.45**:
and
(vi) The date the waste is subject to
the prohibitions.
(4) If a generator is managing
prohibited waste in tanks, containers, or
containment buildings regulated under
40 CFR 262J4. and is treating such
waste in such tanks, containers, or
containment buildings to meet
applicable treatment standards under
subpart D of this part, the generator
must develop ami follow a written
•Vaste analysis para which describes the
procedures the generator will cany out
to comply won the treatment standards.
(Generators treating hazardous debris
under the alternative treatment
standards of Table 1. § 268.45. however.
are not nibjnct to these waste analysis
requirements.) The plan must be kept on
site in the generator's records, and the
following requirements must be met:
(i) The waste analysis plan must be
based on a detailed chemical and
physical analysis of a representative
sample of the prohibited waste**) being
treated, and contain all information
necessary to treat the wastefs) in
accordance with the raminrrtents of
this Part, including the selected tasting
frequency.
(it) Such plan must be filed with me
EPA Regional Administntar (or his
designated representative) or State
authorized to implement Part 268
requirements a minimum of 30 days
prior to the- treatment activity, with
debvery verified.
(iii) Wastes shipped off-site pursuant
to this paragraph must comply with the
notification requirements of
.
(5) If a generator determines whether
the waste is restricted based solely on
his knowledge of the waste, all
supporting1 data used te make this
dete
•tit
t be retained on-site
in the generator's files. If a generator
determines whether the waste is
restricted based on tatting this waste or
an extract developed using the test
method described to Appendix I of this
part, all waste analysis data must be
retained on-sil» in the generator's files.
(6) If a generator determines that be is
managing a restricted waste that is
excluded farm the definition of
hazardous or solid waste or exempt
from Subtitle C regulation, under 4O
CFR 261.2 through 281.6 subsequent to
the point of generation, be must place
a one-time notice stating such
generation, subsequent exclusion from
the definition of hazardous or solid
waste or exemption from RCRA. Subtitle
C regulation, and the disposition of the
waste, in the facility's file.
(7) Generators must retain on-site a
copy of all notices, certifications.
demonstrations, waste analysis data,
and other documentation produced
pursuant to this section for at toast five
years bora the date that the waste that
is the subject of such documentation
was last sent to on-site or off-site
treatment, storage, or disposal. The five
year record retention period is
automatically extended during the
course of any unresolved enforcement
-------
-47882 Federal Register / Vol. 59. No. 180 / Monday. September 19. 1994 / Rules and Regulation*
or
as requested by the Administrator.
requirements of this paragraph apply to
id wastes even when the hazardous
characteristic is removed prior to
disposal, or when the waste is excluded
from the definition of hazardous or solid
waste under 40 CFR 261.2-261.6, or
exempted from Subtitle C regulation,
subsequent to the point of generation.
(8) It a generator is managing a lab
MT-t flmt conMrH* wastes identified in
Appendi* IV of this part and wishes to
mF3 the alternative treatment standard
under § 268.42, with each shipment of
waste the generator must submit a
notice to the treatment facility in
accordance with paragraph (a)(l) of this
section. The generator must also comply
with the requirements in paragraphs
(a)(5) and (a)(6) of this section, and must
submit the following certification,
which must be signed by an authorized
representative:
I certify under penalty of law that 1
personally have •xamimd and am familiar
with the waste and that the lab peck contains
only the wattes specified in appendix IV to
part 268 or solid wastes not subject to
regulation under 40 CFR part 261.1 am aware
that then an significant penalties for
submitting a MM certification, including the
possibility of fine or imprisonment
(9) If a generator is managing a tab
pack that contain* organic wastes
specified in Appendix V of this Part and
wishes to use the alternate treatment
standards under S 268.42. with each
shipment of waste the generator must
submit a notice to the treatment facility
in accordance with paragraph (a)(l) of
this section. The generator also must
comply with the mquiramenU in
paragraphs («)(5) and la)(6) of this
section, and must submit the following
certification which must be signed by an
authorized representative: I certify
under penalty of law that I personally
have examined and am familiar with the
waste through analysis and testing or
through knowledge of the waste and
that the lab pack contains only organic
waste specified in Appendix V to Part
268 or solid waste* not subject to
regulation under 40 CFR Part 261.1 am
aware that then an significant penalties
for submitting a false certification,
including the possibility of fine or
imprisonment
ClO) Small quantity generators with
tolling agreements pursuant to 40 CFR
262.20M must comply with the
applicable notification and certification
requirements of paragraph (a) of this
section for the initial shipment of the
waste subject to the agreement Such
generators must retain on-site a copy of
the notification and certification.
together with the tolling agreement, for
at least three years after termination or
expiration of the agreement The three*
year record retention period is
automatically extended during the"
course of any unresolved enforcement
action regarding the regulated activity or
as requested by the Administrator.
[FR Doc. M-2249Z Filed 9-1&-&; 8:45 am]
40 CFR Part* 148,260,261,264,265,
268.268 and 271
IW420SO-AOW
LandOispoaall
Treatment Standards tor Organic
ToxfcttyChsncteftete Waste* and
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION; Final rule.
SUMMARY: As pert of the Agency's Land
Disposal Restrictions (LOR) program,
EPA is today promulgating treatment
standards for the newly identified
organic toxidty characteristic (TC)
wastes (except those managed in Clean
Water Act (CWA) systems, CWA-
equivalent systems, or Class I Safe
Drinking Water Act (SDWA) injection
wells), and for all newly listed coke by-
product and chlorotoluena production
wastes. The required treatment
standards for these wastes must be met
before they an land disposed. EPA is
also requiring ignitable characteristic
wastes with a high total organic carbon
(TOC) content and toxic characteristic
pesticide wastes, that an being disposed
in Class! nonhazardous waste injection
wells, to either be injected intoa well
that is subject to a no-migration
determination, or be treated by the
designated LDR treatment method.
Ion of these treatment
for the newly identified and
listed waste* and promulgation of the
dilution prohibition* for high TOC
ignitables and pesticide* hufiUs
requirements of a proposed consent
decree between EPA and the
Environmental Defense Fund, end a
settlement agreement between EPA. the
Hazardous Waste Treatment Council.
and a number of environmental group*
including the Natural Resources Defense
Council'
EPA is also making a major
improvement in the Land Disposal
Restriction* program in order to
simplify and provide consistency in the
requirement*. EPA is establishing a
single set of requirements, referred to as
universal treatment standards, that
apply to most hazardous wastes. EPA is'
also simplifying the Land Disposal
Restrictions program by reducing
paperwork for the regulated community.
and improving guidance to make
compliance easier. EPA is also
publishing clarifying guidance regarding
treatability variances, which largely
restates previous Agency statements.
Finally, EPA is modifying the hazardous
waste recycling regulations which will
allow streamlined regulatory decisions
to be made regarding the regulation of
certain types of recycling activities.
DATES: Effective dote: The final rule is
effective on December 19.1994. Section
266.100 and Appendix Vm are effective
September 19,1994.
Applicability dates: For high TOC
D001 (40 CFR 148.17) and halogenated
pesticides wastes (40 CFR 148.17)
disposed in Class I nonhazardous
injection deep wells, the compliance
date is September 19,1995. For
radioactive waste mixed with the newly
listed or identified wastes, or soil and
debris contaminated with such mixed
wastes (40 CFR 268.38). the compliance
date is September 19,1996. Although
the effective date of today's rule is
December 19,1994, facilities will be in
compliance if they meet the universal
treatment standards (UTS) before the 90-
day period ends.
ADDRESSES: The official record for this
rulemaking is identified as Docket
Number F-94-CS2F-FFFFF, and is
located in the EPA RCRA Docket, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Room 2616,401M Street, SW..
Washington. DC 20460. The RCRA
Docket is open from 9 am to 4 pm
Monday through Friday, except for
Federal holiday*. The public mutt make
an appointment to review docket
material* by calling (202) 260-4327. The
public may copy a maximum of 100
pages from any regulatory document at
no cost. Additional copies cost $.15 per
page. The mailing address is EPA RCRA
Docket (5305). U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 401M Street, SW..
Washington, DC 20460.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
general information, contact the RCRA
Hotline at (800) 424-9346 (toll-bee) or
(703) 412-9810 locally. For technical
information about mercury and
radioactive mixed waste, contact Shaun
McGarvey on (703) 308-8603; for
technical information about lab packs
end metal Universal Treatment
Standards, contact Anita Cummings on
(703) 308-8303; for technical
information about organic Universal
Treatment Standards, contact Lisa Jones
f
t>
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
Revision Checklist 127 Summary*
Rule Title:
Checklist Title:
Reference:
Promulgation Date:
Effective Date:
Cluster:
Provision Type:
Linkage:
Optional:
Burning of Hazardous Waste in Boilers and Industrial Furnaces
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces; Administrative Stay and Interim
Standards for Bevil! Residues
58 £B 59598-59603
November 9, 1993
October 15, 1993*
RCRA Cluster IV
HSWA
Revision Checklists 85, 94, and 111
Yes
s
Summary: On February 21, 1991, EPA promulgated regulations under Subtitle C of the
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) that would expand controls on hazardous
waste combustion to regulate the burning of hazardous waste in boilers and industrial
furnaces (BIFs). Among other things, the regulations provide two tests for determining
whether residues derived from Bevill devices (e.g., cement kilns, light-weight aggregate kilns,
primary smelters, coal-fired boilers) co-processing hazardous waste and raw materials are
exempt from hazardous waste control: (1) if levels of the toxic constituents in the
waste-derived residue are not significantly higher than in normal residue; or (2) if levels of the
toxic constituents in the waste-derived residue do not exceed specified health-based levels.
This November 9,1993 interim final rule announces an administrative stay on the previously-
published health-based limits for nonmetals that are used to determine whether Bevill residues
are exempt from the definition of hazardous waste under test number 2, provided that other
limits are met on an interim basis (in order to prevent a situation where nonmetal constituents
in these residues go unmonitored). The effect of this rule is to replace the current limits
needed to qualify for the Bevill exemption (under test number 2) with the land disposal
restriction limits for underlying constituents in nonwastewaters pending further administrative
action to establish health-based levels.
State Authorization: This rule is placed in RCRA Cluster IV. Because the regulations
promulgated in this rule reduce the regulatory requirements for certain wastes. States are not
required to adopt the changes addressed by this rule; they may impose requirements that are
broader in scope or more stringent than those imposed under Federal regulations. As such,
the checklist developed for this rule has been designated as optional. However, EPA strongly
recommends that States adopt this administrative stay as soon as possible because the
nonmetal limits affected by the stay are extremely conservative and were based on
unintended, mistaken assumptions. For States that choose to adopt the checklist, the State
modification deadline is July 1, 1995 (or July 1, 1996 if a State statutory change is
necessary). All changes go into effect immediately because this rule was promulgated under
HSWA authorities. Both interim and final authorization are available, interim authorization
expires January 1, 2003.
The State Revision Application must include applicable regulations, AG statement addendum.
Revision Checklist 127, other associated checklists and other application materials, i.e. a
program description and an MOA, as determined by the Regional office.
SUM127.15- 1/12/94
[Printed: 12/21/94)
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
Revision Checklist 127 Summary (cont'd)
Attorney General's StatemenrEntry: The following entry should be placed at Subsection XX
G in the Model Revision Attorney General's Statement.
G. [OPTIONAL: This is a reduced requirement.] State statutes and
regulations contain an administrative stay, until further administrative action is
taken, that replaces the current limits needed to qualify for the Bevill exemption
under test number 2 with the land disposal restriction limits for underlying
constituents as indicated in Revision Checklist 127.
Federal Authority: 5 U.S.C. 705; RCRA §S2002(a), and 3001(b)&(e)<1>; 40
CFR 266.112(b}(2)(i) and Part 266 Appendix VII, as amended November 9,
1993 (58 ER 59598).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Enactment and Adoption
Remarks of the Attorney General
f
.15-1/12/94
(Print.* 12/21/9*1
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9S41.OO-21
SPA 15
RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 127
t
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces;
Administrative Stay and Interim Standards for Bevill Residues
58 £3 59598-59603
November 9, 1993
(RCRA Cluster IV, HSWA provisions)
Notes: 1) Although this Revision Checklist is designated as optional, EPA strongly recommends
that States adopt the less stringent requirements of this administrative stay because the nonmetal
limits affected by the stay are extremely conservative and were based on unintended mistaken
assumptions. This rule replaces the current nonmetal limits needed to qualify for the Bevill
exemption, as specified in the February 21, 1991 rule (Revision Checklist 85), with the land
disposal restriction (LDR) limits for underlying constituents in nonwastewaters pending further
administrative action to establish appropriate health-based levels.
2) Note that the administrative stay is conditioned on compliance with the interim LDR
exemption values. Noncompliance with those values would mean that the owner or operator of
the Bevill device is no longer meeting the conditions of the administrative stay and, therefore,
must comply with the comparison test in § 266.112(b)(1), in order to qualify for the exclusion in
§ 266.112. If the owner or operator meets neither the conditions of the stay nor the comparison
test, then the residue would be subject to regulation as hazardous waste. Additionally, the stay
does not affect the application of the procedural requirements in 266.112(b)(2) except as outlined
in 58 FR 59600, column 3, sections V. A-D.
November 9, 1993 - Page 1 of 3
DCL127.1S • H..«.d 1/8/94
Print** 12/21/9*
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9S41.OO-21
SPA 15
RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 127: Boilers and Industrial Furnaces;
Administrative Stay-and Interim Standards for Bevill Residues (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
t
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
r
ANALOGOUS STATE CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS: ^|
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STUN-
CENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
M SCOPE
PART 266 - STANDARDS FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF SPECIFIC HAZARDOUS WASTES AND
SPECIFIC TYPES OF HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITIES
SUBPART H - HAZARDOUS WASTE BURNED IN BOILERS AND INDUSTRIAL FURNACES
REGULATION OF RESIDUES
at the end of the
paragraph, before
"; and", add new text
addressing
administrative stay for
levels specified in
appendix VII and
default level of 0.002
micrograms/kg or level
of detection as
identified in Note 1 ;
owner or operator
must comply with
alternative levels
defined as land
disposal restriction
limits specified in §
268.43 for F039
nonwastewaters;
compliance based on
good-faith effort to
detect constituents;
demonstration of
good-faith efforts; stay
in effect until further
administrative action is
taken
266.112(b)(2)(i)
f
t.1
November 9, 1993 - Page 2 of 3
DO.127.1S - Rmriwd- 1/0/9*
12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 127: Boilers and Industrial Furnaces;
Administrative Stay and Interim Standards for Bevill Residues (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
tt
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STWN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
APPENDIX VII TO PART 266
I
HEALTH-BASED LIMITS FOR EXCLUSION OF WASTE-DERIVED RESIDUES
redesignate "Note" as
"Note 1 " after tables;
add new "Note 2"
regarding
administrative stay of
specified and default
levels for constituents
specified in 5
266.112(b)(1)
provided owner or
operator complies with
alternative levels
defined in
266.112(b)(2)(i)
266, Appendix VII,
notes
Note the typographical error in the Fgderal Register; "FO39" should be "F039" (i.e., should be
a zero not an upper case "O").
November 9, 1993 - Page 3 of 3
DCL127.1S - R*vMd: 1/8/94
Printed: 12/21/94
-------
t
-------
59598 Federal Register / Vol. 59. No. 215 / Tuesday. November 9. 1993 / Rules and Regulations
t
ENVntONUEHTAL PROTECTION •
AGENCY
40 era Putt 266 and 271
[Fm.-4TO-7] -'
*
Bijrtng of Hazardous Waate In BoHora
AOfNCY: Enviranmantal Protection
Agancy (EPA).
! Intarim final rule.
SUMMARY: On Fabtuaxy 21, 1991. EPA
promulgated ragulation* under Subtitle
C of the Reaouice Conanvation and
Recovery Act {RCRA) that would
expand controls on hazardoua waata
cointHirtiftn to iMulate tl1^ huminfl of
hazardoua waate in boilara ""^
industrial fumacaa (BIFs). Among other
things, the regulations provide two tests
te determining whether residues
derived from Bevill devices (e.g.,
cement Una. light-weight aggregate
kilns, primary smelters, coal-fired
boilers) co-processing hazardoua waste
and raw materials are exempt from
hazardous waste control: if levels of the
toxic constituents In the waste-derived
residue an not significantly h Office of
Solid Waste (OS-322W). U.S.
Environmental Prataction Agency. 401
M Stnat SW.r Washington. DC 20490.
(703)308-6458.
sumaeBfTMV MKHHATION: The
contants of today's notice en bated in
tha following outlina:
L Overview of Agency Action
IL Background •
ffl. toaceuracy of the Fritting t lartto
TV. Basis teUiinf Land Disposal'
Standards at fn*""^"* Units
A. LDR limits
B.Goasidenttai of Using 1C Units
C Which Hsserdous Camg&ta** aw
Afimad
V. Implementation of the Revised Unto
temporary measure pending future
ruiemaking to consider whether more
appropriate health-based limits should
be established.
This stay does not affect the
application of procedural requirements
of 1266.112(b)(2). except that the
following provisions of paragraph
(b)(2)(i) are also stayed: (i) The default
limit of 0.002 micrograms per kilogram:
and (2) the procedure for handling
aondetect values. Under the
conditioned stay, a default value does
not
lsSlavid
B. PraoiduiM te Haadtlat
C Analytical Methods
D, Immadiati Effective Data
VI State Authority
A. Applicability of Rules la
StatM
B. jBset es^Stete Authorisation
VD> FipaWOn Mvovctimi Act
On January 22,1903, the Cement Kim;
Recycling Coalition (OCRQ submitted a
petition to EPA to modify $294.112 of
tat Boiler and Mistrial FuBMa»OVI
J^Mt^^Mft •^^^AB^^B that VMII^fr t^M tt^^fe ^M
ontsptD'qvMlify for the Bevill exensptlOB
(under the test in S 266.112M(2)). The
estabUahedmeppendixVII.pajt2B6. :
^^^ ^^^^^^^^>i^ ^^^^^^^^^^^j^^ «^ »^_ — .^i^^
9i99KnitBnWCUBi*tVi&V9WV&uQ**R
tfaettney *
tlntbB
based on unmtsnded. mistaksB
assumptions on EPA'e part. 1h
die Agency is today staying UK
provided that owners end opar
such Bevill device* complywitk tend
• « - t^_ __Tj t^-lj
i eel ill I In i »«•<*• Htntffy rt^aejn
bam the "low toxicitv" atuUmsH
oMofthekevbesesfortbetsanpa-
n of Bevill nsiduesftoml
i of hazardous waste. S6 HI
7197 (Feb. 21,1991);
Os^tnseFund v. SPA. 952 PM
1329 (D.C Ol. 1999). cart <"
U.S. 1011 (1999). Thus, the
NonetheUes.EPAvii
disposal restriction Umltaee a
iven that EPA has
established detectable limits for
virtually every hazardous constituent
for which analytical methods are readily
available. Further, detection limits
under the stay will be handled as they
an for compliance with the land
disposal restrictions. As provided by
$ 268.43(c)(3), the Agency considers that
the limit for an organic constituent has
been met if the facility used a
combustion process to treat the waste.
and has been unable to detect the
constituent despite using its best efforts
as defined by applicable Agency
guidance or standards. Until such
»facility may demonstrate best efforts
by achieving detection limits for the
CTBrtfiHtif tltfj d« not exceed the limit
by an order of magnitude.
EPA Is *"»v<'«{[ "»<• stay immediately
eOscttve. The Agency is taking this
ediBBi efUKt iiMiKifig a good-faith effort to
coii*ittioini(l ABV>
The Agency provided notice and
requested comment from the
approximately 90 commonters on ^he
Bevill provision of the BIP rule during
the previous ruiemaking process.' EPA
received comments from 16 respondents
lepreeenting regulated BIFs and
incineration Industry (e.g., the National
Waste Management Association and the
Hazardous Waste Treatment Council).
These comments an addressed in this
reeeonabry expected to be1^
thsse residues. The Agency believe* thai
Under S 266.112 of the BIF rule. EPA
codified procedures far owners and
operators of Bevill devices (e.g., cement
Urns, light-weight eggregate kilns, coal-
fired boUera, and primary smehars) to
determine whether weir residues retain
the Bevill exemption when the mcUities
oaWan or co-process hazardous wastes
ahaaj with fossil fuels or normal raw
' ' .See59FR7199-7200
-------
Federal
/ VoL 58, No. 215 / Tuesday. November 9. 1993 / Rule* and Regulations 59599
(February 21.1091). Those procedures
implement the principle that, if-bamtag
hazardous waste does not efteci the
character of the residue (Le.. the midue
would be essentially the MOM whether
or not hazardous wastes wen burned or
co-processed), the waste4erived residue
retains the Bevill exemption. The
procedures require facilities that claim
the Bevill exemption when burning
listed hazardous waste to conduct
sampling and analysis of their residues
to Hnrmqant that either (1) Levels of
toxic constituents in waste-derived
residue an not significantly higher than
in normal (i.e.. when not burning
hazardous waste) residues; or (2) levels
of toxic constituent* in waste-derived
residue do not exceed health-based
levels specified in the.rule.If the
residue passes either test, the Bevill
exemption is retained.
The rule requires sampling and
analysis as often as necessary to
rhfiwt»rjyj flif residue, provided that
the compositing period does not exceed
24 hours. For example, if a facility
analyzes its residue less frequently than
daily, the sample analyzed cannot
represent residua that oas been
generated during a period exceeding 24
hours.
The constituents that must be
analyzed for air
mathematically converting the
miUtgnm per liter drinking water limits
to muUgram par kilogram units. In the
rush to promulgate *hf PIF rales muta*
a stringent court-ordered deadline, the
Agency failed to note that this approach
continues to ttfnim that the
hypothetical exposed individual is
ingesting two liters (two kilograms) per
day of the media—thai is. two kilograms
or 4.4 pounds of residue. Clearly, this
was not the Agency's intent In previous
risk assessments, the Agency has often
Mymiiait that an individual ingests 0.2
grams of soil per day. If a residue
ingestion rate of CU grama per day was
assumed, then the appendix vn. part
266. nonmetal limits may be orders of
concentrations to the residue:
alternative of establishing
on drinking water limit* ti
rtotheToxicity
istic Leachate Procedure
is certain is'that die-existing
values an mistaken. The
believes that the nonmetal
Agency
health-based bmita must be corrected
immediately.
CKRC alt" petitioned to alter the HBL
value for thallium. likewise arguing that
the regulatory value is inappropriately
low (stringent) due to improper
conversion of values and initial
TTlif If Tf ***''***"'' fflf 'hlllf '"" ^t *
(1) Appendix VUL pert
«n«lllii«tH«ftl«tgnillli
reasonably bo expected to be in the
hazardous wasttTbaned; and (2)
compounds that the- Agency has
nonmetal EPA is not acting on this part
of the petition. 1ffm«e. thif nue was
inJonnation oo thallimn that inoiceiBS
that the RID for this hazardous •
constituent iesifniffcaBtry lower then
determined en
incomplete combustion (L*» they may
be formed during combustion of the
waste) and has listed in appendix Vm.
part 266.
new data, the Agency's OfBce of
Drinking Water (after notic
i cmosntntion Uarit (MO) far
thelttam to 0.002 mg/L See 57 PR 31776
pury 17.1M2X Based am this
nLInacconcyeflsKl
•TheheeM-bessH limits (HBLs) for
noametsJe established la appendix VH.
pert 288, en based on the total
given tnet the Bevill hmita
residue, not an enliact conrentnfton.
the compound in the residue would
better eiisan effective destruction. The
health-baaed limits on the tool
address exgusure Tie. IngestfOD W (Lai
the MOs. See 56 Ft 719QL
thus is not staying that
lie
Ithepoasibitiiaeef
,rt0 include
values ia the f26e.U2
that reflect the
to
IV.
ToestabnsatheHB^lbrncnnMtal*.
taW AMDCT OOBTOlteVd JiHiiMiHl
limits (La., maximum conceatm
limits (MCLs). and fimits based <
This section discusses the basis for,
selecting the i«tnf itiijosal *mir*tfn
nonwastewatan aa interim ™*»tt» as
well as the rationale for not celecting an
individual drank
>nts
day for aUfstima) to total
concenlretioassimpljrby
water limits times a dilution
attenuation (actor (DAT). Otshouldba
nqHd thu The Agency
believes that these limits are achievable
for most RCRA hazardous wastes. See
generally 58 PR 29867 (May 24. 1993)
for an explanation of why EPA believes
theea treatment standards an achievable
for most hazardous wastes.
The Agency believes that it is
reasonable to exempt Bevill residues at
these LDR levels on an interim basis
(pending nitemaiiiig to establish more
appropriate limits) because; (1)
Technology-baeed treatment limits
should identify residues that have the
"low toxkity" property that is one of
the bases far the temporary exclusion of
Bevill residues from the definition of
hazardous waste; (2) they are
promulgated limit* and so I
scrutintasd end subject to ]
comsaeat in previous i
notably the TUrd Thud rule |
22&19-62S (hme 1. 1990)). 1 '
16. IttZ rule applying these standards
to a wider group of prohibited wastes
(57 FR 37203-206). and the May 24.
1003. catena 0a*l rule applying the
*tmrtAm*tt to e«««»ti» ianitmhla mmA
comaiwj hazardous waste*;) (3) the
limits havebeea establiihert far .
VBTtoaUy every hazardous constituent
that can be routinely analyzed by OCS
MS; and (4) they should be readily
echievaMe.
The BMfetHy of commenmn to the
March 24, 1999. lett
LDR limits
d that th
etter agree
acceptable as interim
liaafai peering lulemakmg to establish
ppropriate limits. Several
arer av\
I that exanrpting Bevill residues
-------
59600 Federal Register / Vol. 58, No. 215 / Tuesday. November 9. 1993 / Rules and Regulations
t
•t LDR level* may not be protective •
given that the LDR level* an
technology-based, not health-based.
Commentera also noted that the LDRs
apply to waste that may remain subject
to subtitle C management, rathe* than
wastes excluded from Subtitle C
regulation. We share commanten'
concerns but note the LDR levels are
interim limits (pending rulemaking to
establish health-based levels), and we
believe that they are sufficiently
protective. The LDRs should ensure that
nonmetals an largely destroyed because
they an based on concentration levels
achieved by applying best demonstrated
available treatment technology. No
commenter maintained that wastes
containing these levels of organics
would not satisfy the low hazard Bevill
test with respect to nonmetal
constituents. Moreover, in most cases.
these LDR standards for nonmetals an
based on the level of detection in
combustion residues. Even if the health-
based level for a compound wen to be
lower than the LDR. it may not have
practical significance If the LDR is the
limit of detection in the residue matrix
Other commenten suggested that
then is no emergency situation and that
the Agency should develop appropriate
health-based limits through rulemaking.
Some commenten noted that if the
existing limits could not be met.
facilities still had the option of
documenting that the levels of toxic
constituents in waste-derived residue
wen no higher than in normal (I.e..
generated without burning hazardous
waste) residue under $ 266.112(bHl).
EPA believes that that* limits an not
reasonable (i.e., an to conservative that
they replicate an unrealistic scenario).
and that the option provided by
(b)(l) in any cat* may not be
le. In particular, wo have
I since promulgation of the rule
that it is often difficult to es
t
to establish and
tion levels in
re-establish
normal residue as raw materials or
operating conditions change that **•"
affect the levels of hazardous
constituents in the residue. This is
because devices such as cement kilns
must be operated for extensive periods
of time (e.g., hours or days) to reach
steady-state conditions with respect to
levels of appendix VOL part 261,
compounds in the residue. Thus, the
approach of comparing wests-derived
residue to normal residue may be
problematic.
Finally, we note that by establishing
LDR exemption levels for Bevill residue.
• the Agency is not suggesting that: (1) the
technology-bated treatment standards
excluded residues should necessarily be
subject to the LDR rules. These issues,
as well as other*, will be addressed >n
a follow-up rulemaking.*
B. Consideration of Using TC limits
Several commanters suggested that
the Agency establish limits using the
same approach used for metals. Under
that approach, the limits would apply to
a TCLP extract and would be
established at 100 times the health-
based levels (e.g.. maximum
concentration limits (MCLs). and limits
based on reference doses (RfDs) and unit
risk values (for carcinogens) assuming
the exposed individual drank two liters
of extract per day for a lifetime) to
consider dilution and attenuation.
While the Agency's ultimate policy
preference is to establish risk-based
regulatory levels, the difficulties
involved in this task an formidable and
controversial. For example, in this case,
limits on extract concentrations of
organics would not address the
potential risk posed by ingestion of the
residue itself (e.g.. via fugitive dust).
Although the extract limits may provide
an adequate level of protection, the
Agency has not addressed this potential
exposure pathway at this time.
We note that under HWR, the
Agency will define hazardous
constituent concentration levels below
which a waste is no longer considered
"hazardous." Discussions concerning
these levels an taking place in the
context, of the recently chartered Federal
Advisory Committee on the Hazardous
Waste Identification Rule (HWIR). The
Committee chose to initially discuss
how to provide greater flexibility far the
remediation of contamination at
hazardous waste sitea.lt has also begun
discussions by focusing on
concentrations below which waste
mixtures and treatment residuals would
no longer be subject to the hazardous
waste regulations ("exit" criteria), while
also discussing whether then is a
regulatory approach to relatively
aui
ickly bring" under regulation clearly
waste not now controlled by
the hazardous waste regulations (en
"entry" rule). To help address the
uncertainties of assessing multiple
exposun pathways, the Agt
initiated research to axamii
ne >
-i— has
in
of humans and the environment to
hazardous constituents through t large
number and variety of pathways.
. t to, or appropriate to use
as, health-based limits: or (2) Bevill
«Tkto taiut iMw U *li«d7 UM Mbftctot
s»» M nt sues tew. M. ion).
C. Which Hazardous Constituents Are
Affected
The Bevill comparison test is to be
performed for any hazardous
constituent (i.e.. a constituent listed m
appendix VDI of part 261) that may
reasonably be expected to be a
constituent in the hazardous waste
being co-burned or co-processed in the
Bevill unit, plus the list (found in
appendix Vffl of part 266) of all
products of incomplete combustion that
could also be found in the residues. See
S 266.112(b)(l) and 56 FR 7199. These
requirements remain unchanged by
today's stay.
V. Implementation of the Revised
Limits
The stay is conditioned on
compliance with the interim LDR
exemption values. NoncompUance with
those values would mean that the owner
or opentor of the Bevill device is no
longer meeting the conditions of the
administrative stay and therefore must
comply with the comparison'test in
$286.112(b){l). in order to qualify for
the exclusion In $ 266.112. If the owner
or opentor meets neither the conditions
of the stay nor the comparison test, then
the residue would be subject to
regulation as a hazardous waste.
In addition, the stay does not affect
the application of the procedural
nquinments in § 266.112(b)(2).»except
as noted below.
A. De/du/t Value is Stayed
Under the stay, the default value of
0.002 mioognms per kilogram
established by $ 266.tl2(b)(2) does not
apply given that FO39 limits have been
established for virtually every
prohibited hazardous constituent for
which analytical methods an readily
available. In addition, that default value
would not be appropriate because it was
established as the lower 95th percentile
of the (inappropriate) health-based
limits.
0, Procedure*/or Handling Atondeterts
The procedures for determining
compliance when a constituent is not
detected in the residue will be the same
es those used for compliance with the
FO39 nonmetal limits under the land
disposal restrictions program. As
provided by S 268.43(c)(3). the Agency
oft2aMU(faK2Xttt)t«ul»iB«toct
That pmanph nqvfm MnpUn| and (aitaii *»
r to dMnXM «hnh« ntiom
st*M M-haur p*rtod.
-------
/ VoL Si. No. 215 / Tuaaday. Noyambaw 9, IfiB / Hula* airt Raguiatloai 5MO1
to aatafalish a
far ta» aHjiil awaiptiiii l»i»ai
"
coaakian that tha limit fcra.<
hatbaannattttho
mabkrto detact tb*
using its baat aflbrta m dafoadb?
applicabla AganGjr
standards. Until such guidance or
standards an finalized (ad M auch
guidance piewntly exi*t»). thafccUtty
may demonstrate iuch effort* by
•entering dotation limit* tot the
constituent that do not exceed an order
of mtgritude above the interim limit.
See Nrisod §2tt.ii2(bM2XU.
We note that the Agency developed
tfait policy far the TOM iimmalal
that
th»FO39 standeRlB are below the level
at which, a competent analytical lab eat
quantify thaaa compotuids. la the-IUfd)
ThiniHnal Rule. EPA revised tha FOM
nonwastawatar standards between
proposal and promulgation to
Bevill
whether their residues
standards were developed baaed oar
residual levels in indanatot Mb. end
incinantor ash matrices cub* difficult
to analyze. Under today's any. however,
the Agincy to mtog th»n iHmhntoi*
intMim Umitt far Bwritt iMidttM.
(tadnontor uh boot tBcvill nridtMj
Although torn* BtvilliwiduM BIT
pnftnt a matrix u dlfBcuttto uauyt*
iLt,.toachtoy*l *— _^ft_ »_ _.._ ^ ^mBBBftaV •••! all •
IDODBnaBaT OD1* aDC • 0WIB I^mniaV
and that Oe majority of BevUI i
sbouldpaeeat ~
would antonMOcaDy lose their Bevill
(eseuming the statistical last
I b» satia&d), or, etroaQy
mdlitylai
lot a coaaMfaMBt if the rtatartlrai llmft
far the coBetttuaat ia not mot* than an,
order QtmtgnlhwUhiihsr than the
POMbvaL
Several commanleDi stated that SW-
846 methods are not leadUyanilehla
for 47 of tha FD38 compound "^
WtOOttt
tha
of
to tha
poaalbllity ofanfagulalad
tal good CMW* (pom«tt
to S U^.C 553(b)l Is nawUdto jurttfr
^ — — •- -— ___
pmtidadallataf
on tha POM d* "far
donott>at-EPA
EPA-a Tlaw.
W Of
IB met. EPA ddibanMlf
ncantradoa of 43 oeganle
ia cananf Un dtttt ftom thtaa
indicata that datactlon Btotto an
below th» FO39 Bmita.*1btai. lb»
ttTB applh ahnut aia unuHf
»• - "* « --*—» ...^Tn-
lutaif was aw • wgatni»n»r. •••
ma]dngaapod*&ahalbrt.to
datacdon^tts at otbrtowAa FOW
laTObwffloaapktodpap.
sat FJdt tarn »SM g>.c dr.
aBWam
fttaW 9(HNk
A DnBMdrati ^ffactfn Dial*
EPA to
to S UJXL 70S.«ilboAdbai,
A. AppHa*aitr of Koto ia Authorial
8809 of ROM. EPA
faciiitto
adiiaradat
-------
59602 Federal Register / Vol. 58, Na 21S / Tuesday. November 9. 1993 / Rules and Regulations
I
State was authorized to permit When
new, more stringent Federal
requirements wen promulgated or
enacted, the State was obliged to enact
equivalent authority within specified
time frames. New Federal requirements
did not take effect in sn authorized State
until the State adopted th* requirements
as State law.
In contrast, under section 300B(g} of
RCRA. 42 U.S.C. 6926(g). new
requirements and prohibitions imposed
under HSW A authority take effect in •
authorized States «t th* same time that
they *•!» effect ID nonauthorized States.
EPA is directed to carry out those
requirements and]
authorized States,
rftionsin
iludfflgthe
issuance of permits for those new
requirements, until the State is granted
authorisation to do so. While States
must still adopt HSWA-related
provisions as State law to achieve or
retain flinJ authorisation, the HSWA
applies in authorized Stats* ID the
interim.
Today's stay affects regulatory
provisions promulgated pursuant to
section 3004(q) of RCRA. a provision
added by HSWA. On particular, that
implements the ambiguous
i in section 3004(q](l) that
i in this subsection shall be
construed to impair the provisions of
section 6921(bX3) of this title" (the
Bevill amendment].) Therefore, the
Agency is adding today's provisions to
iS271.1(j)wnichldentifiesthe
Tablet in S 271.1
Federal program nqu
.that i
[pursuant to HSW A and
that take effect simultaneously in all
States, regardless of thfir authorization
status. States that an already authorized
to implement the 8IF rule are also
encouraged to undertake an
administrative action (e.g., a stay or
interim rule) consistent with the
administrative stay announced today by
EPA.
B. Effect on State Authorizations
With the exception of those State*
which have received authorization for
the BIF rule, EPA will Implement the
BIF provisions of today's stay in all
States. EPA's implementation of today1*
stay will continue until Stateemodlry
their programs to adopt th* provision*
recommend that States adopt today's
provisions. Because more stringent State
program requirements are allowed .
under RCRA section 3009, EPA wiO not
withhold authorization from a State that
submits rules that contain the levels in
the 2/21/91 rule. However, EPA
recommends that the States modify their
programs to adopt today's provisions,
and that they do so on th* same
schedule that would be recommended
for new regulations. Thus, we
recommend that States modify their
programs to adopt today's provisions by
July l, 1996, if a statutory chang* is not
needed, or fuly 1,1997. if a statutory
change i* needed. Once EPA approves
become Subtitle C RCRA requirements.
State* with authorized RCRA
programs may already have
requirements stmilar to those in today's
rule. These State regulations have not
been asserted against the provisions of
today's stay to determine whether they
meet the tests for authorization. Thus, a
State la not authorized to implement
courso, State* with
administer and enforce their standards
as a matter of State law.
In implementing today's rule. EPA
will work with State* under cooperative
i to minimize duplication of
.In many cases. EPA will be able
to defer to th* States' in their efforts to
implement their programs, rather than
takeseparatei
authority.
i under Federal
Act
The Info
olloctic
ofMsnagementand
under OMB Control
i by the Office
(OMB)
r 2050-0078.
PART 266—STANDARDS FOR THE
MANAGEMENT Of SPECIFIC
HAZARDOUS WASTES AND SPECIFIC
TYPES OP HAZARDOUS WASTE
MANAGEMENT FACILITIES
1. The authority citation for part 266
continues to read as follows:
AotboHtr Sacs. 1006.2002U). 9004. »nd
3014 of the Solid Watts Disposal Act, u
amended by the Resource Co&iervatiOD and
Recovery Act of 1976. as anemted (42 U.S.C
6905.8912M, 6924, and 6934).
2. Section 266.112 U amended by
revising paragraph (b}(2)(i) to read as
follows:
,112 RegutaBen of residues.
W • *
(2j. . .
(i) Nonmetal constituents. The
concentration of each nonmetal toxic
constituent of concern (specified in
paragraph (bKD of this section} in the
waste-derived residue must not exceed
th* health-based level specified in
appendix YD of this
detection
TM« ttoj Anm* no* a«hrt rt»a eAai fvf tftssi •***^4s1Vli>
Uat ofSabjects to 40 CFK Parts 266 and
an
i IM -------- * \Hm
is epprovoa oy
EPA. 40 CFR 271.21(*M2) requires that
States that have final authorisation must
modify their programs to reflect Federal
program change*, and mutt
subsequently •"*•••<• the modifications
to EPA for approval Although today'a
rocedure*. Hazardous waste.
tergovcnmentalrelations, Recycling.
Dated: October IS. 19*3.
Cmlfttl
Lin part 266;
EPA, we nonetheless strongly
prescribed In SW-846), whichever is
higher. If a health-based limit fora
constituent of concern is not listed in
appendix VU of this part, then a limit of
0.002 micrograms per kilogram or the
level of detection (using analytical
procedures prescribed in SW—646),
whichever is higher, shall be used. The
level* specified in appendix VD of this
part (and the default level of 0.002
micrograms per kilogram or the level of
detection for constituents as identified
in Note 1 of appendix VH of this
chapter) are administratively stayed
constituents specified In paragraph
fbHl) of this section, that the owner or
operator complies with alternative
levels defined as the land disposal
restriction limit* specified in S 268.43 of
this chapter for FO39 noawattewaten.
fa complying with those alternative
levels, if an owner or operator is unable
to detect* constituent despite
documenting use of best good-faith
efforts as defined by applicable Agency
guidance or standards, the owner or
operator is deemed to be in compliance
Jar that constituent Until new guidance
or standard* are developed, the owner
or operator may demonstrate such good-
faith efforts by achieving a detection
limit far the constituent that does not
exceed an order of magnitude above the
level provided by $268.43 for FO39
iionwastewatan. The stay will remain in
•fleet until further administrative action
-------
Fcdanl Raglata* / Vol. SS, No. 215 / Tuaaday. Novambat fl. 1993 / Rule» and Regulations 59603
Fadaral tagtrtar ind to Coda of
Fadani Ragulatiou; ud
U In part 271:
VHafpait28fris
•ting tha axWing
not* at the rad of th» appmdix u noto
1 tod Adding • not* 2 to mdu follows
Appmdix VII I AnnuMI
UMi S: Th* b«dt qMcia^ ta lUt
•ppwdta ud tb*
-------
59598 Federal Register / Vol. SB. No. 215 / Tuesday. Novemb«r 9. 1993 / Rules and Regulations
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Put* 266 Mid 271
IFRL-4792-7]
Burning of Hazardous Waste hi Boilere
and Industrial Furnace*
MENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION; Interim final rule.
SUMMARY: On February 21.1991, EPA
" r Subtitle
I of the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act (RCRA) that would
expand controls on hazardous waste
combustion to regulate the burning of
hazardous waste in boilers and
industrial furnaces (BIFs). Among other
things, the regulations provide two tests
for determining whether residues
derived from Bevill devices (e.g..
cement kilns, light-weight aggregate
kilns, primary smelters, coal-fired
boilen) co-processing hazardous waste
and raw materials are exempt from
hazardous watte control: if levels of the
toxic constituents in the waste-derived
residue en not significantly higher then
in normal residue; or if levels of the
toxic constituents in the waste-derived
residue do not exceed specified heelth-
based levels. EPA if
an interim final rule
limits for nonmetals that are used1 to
determine whether Bevill residues en
waste under test number 2, provided
that other limits en ost **** *** interior
basis (in order to {invent e sitnattou
when nonmetal constituents in theae>
residues BO ^.iif "^flnitonii}. The eflecl oC
this rule is to replace m* carat Unite
needed to qualify far the Bevill
exemption (under test number 2) with
the land disposal restriction limits for
underlying constituents in
nonwasteweter* pending further
administrative irtion to establish..
health-based levels.
VPKTlvl PAT1: October 13,1993.
: The official ncord for this
is identified as
Number F-93-BBAS-FPFFF. and is
located in the RCRA Infamt^™' nmt»
located at EPA/RCRA Information
Center, room M2616.401M Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20460.
The RCRA Information Canter is open
from 9a.m. to 4 pjn.
Friday, except for federal
public must make an app
review docket materiala. G
ton niRTMejl MNHNATWN CONTACT: For
•"general information, contact the RCRA
Hotline at (800) 424-9346 (toU toe) or..
(703) 920-4810.
For technical information
to
11(202)280-
this notice, contact Shiva Garp> Office of
Solid Waste (OS-322W). U.S
Environmental Protection Agency, 401
M Street. SW.. Washington. OC 20460.
(703) 308-8459.
contents of today's notice are listed la
the following outline:
I. Overview of Agency Action
n. Background
IV. Basis for Uiiag Land Disposal I
Standards at Interim Limits
A-LDRLunitr
B. CoBilderatiOB of UiinaTC Lkniti
C Which HaxHdoui Owtftneaai aw
Affected
V. ImpltnM&taticm of the Revised Unas
A. Defcutt Value is Stajod
B. Pnoadurw for HandHatNondeteeei
C Analytical Methods
D. bnmediate Effective Ovte
VI State Authority
A. Applicability of Rule* la j
States
B. Effect OB Stats Authorization
mPapsrworkReibenoiiAct
L Overview el Agency Adke>
On January 22,1993. the Cement KUa
cUno Coalition I
Recycling!
i(CKRQ
petition to EPA to modify $ 2§6.112of
the Boiler and Industrial Fumaca (BV|
Rub IP emend tha heaUh-liiaail llselle
darivedneidiMatEiat must ba net ik
OTdertDowlifyrortheBevilli
(imdertheteetm S2B8.112(bI2)).>
Ageocy agrees met the nonnstsl I
established in appendix VTJ. pjstaBB.
>tathepomt
temporary measure pending future
rulemaking to consider whether more
appropriate health-based limits should
be established.
This stay does not affect the
application of procedural requirements
of S 266.112(b)(2). except that the
following provisions of paragraph
(b)(2)(i) an also stayed: (1) The default
limit of 0.002 micrograms per kilogram;
end (2) the procedure for handling
nondetset values. Under the
conditioned stay, a default value does
not apply given mat EPA has
established detectable limits for
virtually every hazardous constituent
for which analytical methods are readily
available. Further, detection limits
under the stay will be handled as they
an for compliance with the land
disposal restrictions. As provided by
S 268.43(c)(3). the Agency considers that
the limit for an organic constituent has
been met if the facility used a
combustion process to treat the waste,
and has been unable to detect the
constituent despite using its best efforts
as defined by applicable Agency
guidance or standards. Until such
guidance or standards an developed,
the facility may demonstrate best efforts
by achieving detection limits for the
constituentflu** do not exceed the limit
by an order of magnitude.
EPA is making this stay immediately
Iva. The Agency is taking this
dtar nuking a good-faith effort to
assumptions on EPA's pan. Tba
tha Agency is today staying those bnte
provided that owners and operaton of
such Bevill devices comply VBBI lasisj
disposal restriction standarde: brtb>
hazardous constituents(bates*
reasonably expected to ba paaasBzIsi
these residues. Tha Agency believes dial
th^M t^"hnnlnfllf t»Mn lAnift dliiMMftl
restriction limits identify netttss* Iks*
have tha "low toxkitv" amtbaaatfjativ
one of the key bases for the
no/1
9327 for appointments. Copws cost
$0.15 per page.
Bevill reaiduecfromtVr
definition of hazardous waste. 56 PR
7197 (Fab. 21,1991); ArvirasaeMeM
Os/anse Fund v. ERA, 852 F.2* tteX
1329 (D.C Or. 1988). cert rtufsat 4M>
U.S. 1011 (1989). Thus, the I
as interim regulatory levels.
Nonetheless, EPA views
*M*possJ restriction limits as a
advance notice and opportunity
comment on the conditioned stay.
Tha Agency provided notice and
requested comment from the
approximately 80 commonters on the
Bevill provision of the BIF rule during
the previous rulemaking process.1 EPA
ncsivad comments from 16 respondents
ispteesntlng regulated BIFs and
iatad organizations, and from the
incineration industry (a.g., the National
Wests Management Association and the
Hazardous Waste Treatment Council).
These r™"1"""*" an addressed in this
Uteder $266.112 of the BIF rule. EPA
codified procedures for owners and
operators of Bevill devices (e.g.. cement
kirns, light-weight aggregate kilns, coal-
find baiters, end primary smelters) to
determine whether their residues retain
the Bevill exemption when the facilities
coin or co-process hazardous wastes
•!••• nviih. fossil fuels or normal raw
mateilili See 96 PR 7196-7200
i seises.
-------
Federal Regtater / Vol. 59, No. 215 / Tuesday. November 9. 1993 / Rules and Regulation* 59599
(February 21.1991). ThoM procedures
implement the principle that, if burning
hazardous waste daw not affect the
character of the residue (U.. the residue
would be essentially the same whether
or not hazardous wastes wen burned or
co-processed), the waste-derived residue
retains the Bevili exemption. The
procedures nquin facilities that claim
the Bevili exemption when burning
listed hazardous waste to conduct
sampling and analysis of their residues
to document that either (1) Levels of
toxic constituents in waste-derived
residue are not significantly higher than
in normal (i.e.. when not burning
hazardous waste) residues: or (2) levels
of toxic constituents in waste-derived
residue do not exceed health-bawd
levels specified in the rule. If the
residue passes either test the Bevili
exemption U retained.
The rule requires sampling and
analysis as often as necessary to
characterize the residue, provided that
die compositing period doaa not exceed
24 hours. For example, if a facility
analyzes its residue less frequently than
daily, the sample analyzed cannot
represent residue that has been
generated during a period exceeding 24
hours.
The constituents that must be
analyzed for are: (1) Appendix vm. pert
261. hazardous constituents that could
reasonably be expected to be in the
hazardous waste Domed; and (2)
compounds' that the Agency his
determined en common products, of
incomplete combustion lie., they may
be formed during combustion of the
waste) and haaosted in appendix VUL
part 266.
ffl. inaccuracy of th*ExisUB«l
The hMhb-buftt Unto (HBLs) for
fiQDimtaUat wtftblintOu in •ppvodix VH*
part 2W. are based on the total
This is because combustion processes)
should destroy nonmetal compounds^
and limits on the total T?Mtir1ff*l the existing
regulatory value ia not stringent
glvn that the Bevill omits wen
OB afplying a 100 fold dttatkH factor to
the MCLs. See S6FR 7199. Th* Agency
concentrations in the residue: the
alternative of establishing limits
on drinking water limits times a
would apply to the Toxicity
Characteristic Leachate Procedure
(TCLP) extract.)
A. LDR Limits
• The Agency **•• established 1
disposal treatment standards for the
underlying hazardous constituents in
FO39 (multisourcB teachate) that an
essentially a compilation of all earlier
treatment standards and include
virtually every RCRA hazardous
constituent that can be routinely
analyzed by gaschromatography/mass
speetrometiy (GC/MSM The Agency
believes that these limits an achievable
for most RCRA hazardous wastes. See
generally 58 FR 29667 (May 24.1993)
for an explanation of why EPA believes
these treatment standards an achievable
for most hazardous wastes.
The Agency believes that it is
iMsonable to exempt Bevili residues at
these LDR levels on an interim basis
(pending niiemaking to establish mom
appropriate limits) because: (1)
Technology-baaed treatment limits
thmuM identify residues that have the
"low toxsdty" property that is one of
the bases fat the temporary exclusion of
Bevili residues from the definition of
hazardous waste: (2) they an
promulgated limits and so 1
scrutinized and subject to |
comsMBt in previous i
notably the Third Third rule I
22619-625 (huts 1.1990)). the i
18.1992. rule applying these i
toa wider graup of prohibited wastes
(57 FR 37203-206), and mo May 24.
1993. iBrterim final rule applying the
standard to certam ignitabla end
corrosive hszanious wastes;' (3) the
i have
?R 7199. Th* Agency virtually every hazard
ttu* mlna. and nt* tlut R«I ha vnutiiMlii •
stit
juidaao* to permit i
i uganliin Ihe pnmltias nss of nannlhua
permit authority to include tfasuiim
values in the-f 266.112 <'
that reflect the i
IT.
that can be routinely analyzed by GC/
MS; end (4) they should be readily
achievaMax
March 24.1999. letter agreed that these
LDR Emits wen acceptable aa interim
_ rataukfng to establish
i eppropriat* limits. Several
Thk section discusses the basia for
selecting the land disposal nstrlctian
ftTHf] Htnit« far tluf inntaylyhij •
nonweslewateis aa intaffo. ttm
well aa the ratfoBab for not
alternative approach based on
water limits times a dilution
attenuation actor (DAF). Qt should ba
mrtsd that tl» LDR limUaeeuUisbedta
today*a stay an based on total
V«c*»* burl* Rail
-------
S9600 Federal Register / Vol. 58. No. 215 / Tuesday. November 9.1993 / Rules and Regulations
t
at LDR levels may not be protective •
given that the LDR levels an
technology-based, not health-based.
Commenttrs also noted that the LDRs
apply to waste that may remain subject
to subtitle C management, rather'than
wastes excluded from Subtitle C
regulation. We share commenten
concerns but note the LDR levels an
interim limit* (pending rulemaking to
establish haalth-basedlevels). and we
believe that they an sufficiently
protective. The LDRs should ensure that
nonmetals an largely destroyed because
they are based on concentration levels
achieved by applying best demonstrated
available treatment technology. No
commenter maintained that wastes
containing these levels of organics
would not satisfy die low hazard BeviU
test with respect to nonmetal
constituent*. Moreover, in most cases,
these LDR standards for nonmetals an
based on the level of detection in
combustion residues. Even if the health-
based level for a compound wen to be
lower than the LDR. it may not nave
practical significance if tin LDR is the
limit of detection in the residue matrix
Other commenten suggested that
then is no emergency situation and that
the Agency should develop appropriate
health-based limits through rulemaking.
Some commenters noted that, if the
existing limits could not be met
facilities stiU had the option of
documenting that the levels of toxic
constituents in waste-derived residue
wen no higher than in normal (La..
generated without burning hazardous
waste) residue under §266.112(b)(l).
EPA believes that these limits sn not
reasonable (le., an so conservative that
they replicate an unrealistic scenario),
and that the option provided by
paragraph (bHl) in any case may not be
practicable. In particular, we nave
learned since promulgation of the rule
that it is often difficult to establish and
re-establish concentration levels in
normal residue as nw materials or
operating conditions change that can
affect the levels of hazardous
constituents in the residue. This is
because devices such as cement kilns
must be operated for extensive periods
of time (e.g.. hours or days) to reach
steady-state conditions with respect to
levels of appendix VUL part 261.
compounds in the residue. Thus, the
approach of comparing waste-derived
residue to normal residue may be
problematic.
Finally, we note that by establishing
LDR exemption levels for BeviU residue,
the Agency is not suggesting that (1) the
an equivalent to, or appropriate to use
as. health-based limits; or (2) BeviU
excluded residues should necessarily be
subject to the LDR rules. These issues,
as well as others, will be addressed in
a follow-up rulemaking.*
B. Consideration of Using TC Limits
Several commenten suggested that
the Agency establish limits using the
same approach used for metals. Under
that approach, the limits would apply to
a TCLP extract and would be
established at 100 times the health-
based levels (e.g., maximum
concentration limits (MCLs). and limits
based on reference doses (RfDs) and unit
risk values (for carcinogens) assuming
the exposed individual drank two liters
of extract par day for a lifetime) to
consider dilution and attenuation.
While the Agency's ultimate policy
preference is to establish risk-based
regulatory levels, the difficulties
involved in this task an formidable and
controversial. For example, in this case,
limits on extract concentrations of
organics would not address the
potential risk posed by ingestion of the
residue itself (e.g.. via fugitive dust).
Although the extract limits may provide
an adequate level of protection, the
Agency has not addressed this potential
exposun pathway at this time.
We note that under HWDC the
Agency will define hazardous
constituent concentration levels below
which a waste is no longer considered
"hazardous." Discussions concerning
these levels an taking place in the
context of the recently chartered Federal
Advisory Committee on the Hazardous
Waste Identification Rule (HWDO. The
Committee chose to initially discuss
how to provide greater flexibility for the
remediation of contamination at
hazardous waste sites. It has also begun
concentrations below which waste
mixtures and treatment residuals would
no longer be subject to the hazardous
waste regulations ("exit" criteria), while
also discussing whether then is e
regulatory approach to relatively
quickly bring under regulation dearly
hazardous waste not now controlled by
the hazardous waste regulations (an
"entry" rule). To help address the
uncertainties of assessing multiple
exposun pathways, the Agency also has
initiated research to examine exposun
of humans and the environment to
hazardous constituents through a large
number and variety of pathways.
C. Which Hazardous Constituents Are
Affected
The BeviU comparison test is to be
performed for any hazardous
constituent (i.e.. a constituent listed in
appendix VEB of pan 261) that may
reasonably be expected to be a
constituent in the hazardous waste
being co-burned or co-processed in the
BeviU unit, plus the list (found in
appendix VTB of pan 266) of aU
products of incomplete combustion that
could also be found in the residues. See
S 266.112(b)(l) and 56 FR 7199. These
piinments remain unchanged by
ly'sstay.
V. Implementation of the Revised
Limits
The stay is conditioned on
compliance with the interim LDR
exemption values. Noncompliance with
those values would mean that the owner
or operator of the BeviU device is no
longer meeting the conditions of the
administrative stay and therefore must
comply with the comparison test in
S 266.m(b)(l), in order to qualify for .
the exclusion in % 266.112. If the owner
or operator meats neither the conditions
of the stay nor the comparison test, then
the residue would be subject to
regulation as a hazardous waste.
In addition, the stay does not affect
the application of the procedural'
requirements in S 266.112(b)(2). * except
as noted below.
A. Default Value is Stayed
Under the stay, the default value of
0.002 micrograms per kilogram
established by S 266.112(b)(2) does not
apply given mat FO39 limit* have been
established for virtually every
prohibited hazardous constituent for '
which analytical methods an readily
available, hi addition, that default value
would not be appropriate because it was
established as the lower 95th percentile
of the (inappropriate) health-based
limits.
B. Procedure* for Handling Nondetects
The procedures for determining
compliance when a constituent is not
detected in the residue wUl be the same
as those used for compliance with the
FO39 nonmetal limits under the land
disposal restrictions program. As
'c)(3). the Agency
«Tfcl*latMrlMMl
niwtUaa. Sw SS FR SSiei (CM. si MSI), a
BPA wttlMAi Ik* quwttoo •tthtttnly to th
*hi Mrttmiir tht imiriinj mrt Muljtii
neutHMBM «Ctaaa.tuftmxia) ratio In Act
Thit pmenpb nqutm MBpttaf end aniyti* a§
I in il»«i»hil m\iUl\
b a+fcmt patod
U>lknradLpn*kUdth«th*Mmp)«*
laV t|W OOBDOStte) ejlfj UUel ftW ntiO
-------
/ VoL Si. Na 215 / Tuosdoy. Novamber 9. 1983 / Riilts and Regulations 59801
has bam BMt if tha fadltty hat bMB
'
using its baat efforts as defined by
applicable Agi
or
(and ao such
4. th» facility
standards an
mty draumstnts sudh «ffrats iqr
•chlavingdatsctian limits for tha
coasttaMnt that do not axcaad an ordar
of KMgnkud* sbov* tha intadm Unit.
SM ravlMd f 2M.lU(b)(3Ktt.
Wa BOM th»t tb* Agsacy davalopad
this policy fat tba Ffj» nonBMtal
standards wmda^padbaaad OB
nsidusi Invli in iocuimtar iitu ud.
indnantor ash matiicas en be «Mntmit
to analysa. Undar today'* ftiy, howavar.
OB Mdkr and ditpoMl
^•'-"-"••pJ EPA doM not haUn that
tb»FO3Bctandaidaa»h«iawdi»I«««l
at wfaidt a ompatant analyttcal lab oa
quantify thaw oonpouudt. la tba Third
Third Final ftdaTffA nviaKi tfa* FO39
nommbmrttar atnihidi bttmaa
ptopoul tod proBndfatUn to
tb* lUtd TUrd Final Roto. Monoiw.
W9 OOtV tDatt* 0 duCtttMCt ttDOWi
.These vanes should
t^nf ba changed BBmediataiy.
At tbe same time, tha Agency haflfcae
it naoaaauy to establish a npkcaf^B
for tha stayed amptionlmkfJaTF
Bawtll laauhBBi Having no interim
Hfftttf JUT ffnmttftm •»BlM t«»H '
co-procasnng hazardous
BavUlmatarieteoDukiiiotaatablKa7
would autrmatJcaJBy loa»tnaii BrrtU
ttatna (awumiag tha atattatteal tart
oanaotbaiati»flad),or,aquaUy
nnaccaptably, tha laaldnaa train co-
procaMtef would tatain BwiU atatw
without hiving to datatmtnawhathaf
aatin
thaco-pnoa
idadsignifk
interim limits for Bavill rastdusa.
(Indnantor a*h is not a BoviU xeddua.)
Although MOM Bavill natdute nay
present a matrix at difficult to anafjp*
O.*.. to achtom tow d*tai*lo» Omits) at
indnarator a«h (t*. bottom aih. from t
cotl-find beilar burning baxaidouB
wuta n»Q» tlw Aoaaqr UltoBW Oat tn*
_ ildbtt—wffltwaaitetD
uiahi* than fiodiuntor ufe. A*
•wiiiaVU^L iijarfii ftvUB ^*> fiBllltk^iM IMi f^A
indicatadiatdatactlonltmttaamwalt
makingaopod-ttlthafforttoachlm
datacttonUmitsalarbalowthaFQ39
larabwinbaablatodoao.
Furtbar, tba Aa
"tCRAliafal
EPA la iaautaHjtaa
to S UAC 708. tuthorizblg
ndaa toatay
*- _ jv_J».^^l
FO9»kTal8houIdaIaobaa)dat9doao>
_naiduaafnniBo«Ul
at lama in tha litigation ovar tha BBf
nib.) EPA b»lia^ that tnuaaoa of a
W OBF
vauMaaroaot
abova. tfaty an baaad on a»
of valuMnauhtBg
and tfaattba matortty of Byrtll rattdoas
than indnantor ash. Finally, if a
particalarB«TUlnaidu»B)atrtoiia lavalsofatganichaxaniouconstitunita
difficult toanalyae. we Mtathata totban«idaas(iadthu»cr»etingU»
facility Udaanad to ba in compliaDm pouibUity of unregulated management
for a constituent if tha dataflinn iimtt of high Totum». high ha«ariw«m.tt
otdarafnugnitudahifbarthaatha C).Toth»«t«rtgoodc»u»(p^uBat
FO38laW. to 5 U^.C5S3{b)) Is needed to justify
Several oommantsES stated tbatSW- the Agency's fnanadiataly efleetho
846 methods an not nadilyavaiJahla adoption of interim noametal vahnt.
for 47 of the FO39 compounds and the aodttencs of these two unaeeaptabla
noted mat a laboratory provided a Bst of ahamativasesUblishae good causa, in
47coimwandsontheFO3fltlatMfbr EPA> vfcnr. EPA hay aho axpkinad
which may do not tut** EPA banetia yfayuBaoffaHatimvahieabonu>>ed
that each F08>ouiiipmunH»»taBnst fronUIRtnatmantstaiidardiisthe
ate
Ini^EPAdalibarttalyaacdDdadftom
Samtl
tote original dan) oj
ofth.MFral» '
pbcabfltt
|UW V|fiMM«VWM«(T fllw HlM^HBpM
•• -» • t- - - * ^J_,
QDnavono aa a iega& nianBTt see
g0» PJi 1526.1938 IP.C Or. 1989], .
•and EPA fs thanfonnot promulgating
•a*/ aTetnactiyerolehara.
A. AppBcabOltyaflbila in AaOtoOud
Statft
Undar aactton M08 of ROtA. EPA
aadSolni
ofl»M(BS«aVU.a
for any
-------
59602 Federal Register / Vol. 58, No. 215 / Tuesday. November 9, 1993 / Rules and Regulations
t
Slat* was authorized to permit Whan
new, more stringent Federal
requirements wan promulgated or
enacted, the State was obliged to enact
equivalent authority within specified
time frames. New Federal requirements
did not take affect in an authorized State
until the State adopted the requirements
as State law.
In contrast under section 3006(g) of
RCRA. 42 U.S.C. 6926(g). new
requirements and prohibitions imposed
under HSWA authority take effect in •
authorixed States at the same time that
they take effect in unauthorized States.
EPA is directed to carry out those
requirements and prohibitions In
authorized States. fairfinMin the
issuance of permits for those new
requirements, until the Stan it granted
authorization to do so. While States
must still adopt HSW A-ralated
provisions as State law to achieve or
retain *j"«i authorization, the HSWA
applies in authorized States in the
Today's stay affects regulatory
provisions promulgated pursuant to
section 3004(q) of RCRA. a provision
added by HSWA, (m particular, that
Q implements the ambiguous
i in section 3004(q)(l} t&at
gin this subsection shall be
fto impair the provisions of
section 6921(bX3)of this title" [the
Bevill amendmentl.) Therafore. the
Agency is adding todav's provisions to
Table 1 in i 271.1(0 whicnldentifios the
Federal program requirements that are
pnunulgated pursuant to HSWA and
that take effect simultaneously in all
States, reaardlees ftf th*^T authorization
status. States that are already authorized
to implement the WP nib are also
encouraged to undertake an
administrative action (e.g.. a stay or
interim rule) consistent with the
administrative stay announced today by
EPA.
B. Effect on State AaihoiixaUo
With the exception of those States
which have received authorization far
the BIP rule. EPA will implement th*
BIF provisions of today's stay in all
States. EPA's implementation of today'*
stay will continue until States modify
and the modification is approved by
EPA. 40 CTR 271.21(e)(2
States that have final aut
requires that
fixation must
modify their programs to reflect Federal
program changes, and mutt
'
visions. Be
id that States adopt todav's
M more stringent State
program requirements are allowed .
under RCRA section 3009. EPA will not
withhold •uthorization from a State that
submits rules that contain the levels in
the 2/21/91 rale. However. EPA
recommends that die States modify their
programs to adopt today's provisions,
and that they do so on the same
schedule that would be recommended
for new regulations. Thus, we
recommend that States modify their
programs to adopt today's provisions by
July 1,199S. if a statutory change la not
needed, or July 1.1997. if a statutory
change is needed. Once EPA approves
ih» modi fixation, ttt^ State rMyifiiiHiffitf
becoine Subtitle C RCRA requirements.
States with authorized RCRA
program* may already have
requirements similar to those in today's
rule. These State regulations have not
PART 268— STANDARDS FOR THE
MANAGEMENT OF SPECIFIC
HAZARDOUS WASTES AND SPECIFIC
TYPES OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
MANAGEMENT FACILITIES
. 1. The authority citation for part 266.
continues to read as follows:
AHtterUv: Sees. 1006. 2002M. 3004. and
3014 of the Solid Wattt Disposal Act. **
•mended by the Resource Coma-ration tad
Recovery Act of 1976. at amended (42 U.S.C
6905, 6912M. 9924. and 6934).
2. Section 266.112 is amended by
revising paragraph (b)(2)(i) to read as
follows:
I2M.112 Reautottenol residua.
(W * *
(2)* * -
(i) Nomnetal constituents. The
tration of each nonmetal toxic
today's stay to determine whether they
meet the testa for authorization. Thus, a
State is not authorized to implement
these *^f'**tipfirti in lieu of EPA until
the State program modification Is
approved. Of course. States with
existing standards may continue to
administer and enforce their standards
as a matter of State taw.
m Implementing today's rote, EPA
will work with States under cooperative
efforts. In many cases. EPA will be able
to defer to the State* in their efforts to
implement their programs, rather than
take separate
authority.
cti
der Federal
The into
•tie
oilactic
requirements of S 266.112 of the BIP
nile have been approved by the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB)
under OMB Control number 2050-0073.
This stay does not affoct the information
^^.—.i^^^—^^f^ A£a>k.A4> i
requirements ot tnat i
271
procedures. Hazardous waste.
Intargovernmetttalrelations. Recycling.
Reporting and recornaa)opu£
requirements.
CenlM.
Lin part 286:
constituent of concern (specified in
paragraph (b)(l) of this section) in the
waste-derived residue must not exceed
the health-based level specified In
appendix vn of this part, or the level of
detection (using analytical procedures
prescribed in SW-846}. whichever is
higher. If a health-based limit for a
constituent of concern is not listed in
appendix VD of this part, than a limit of.
0.002 micrognms par kilogram or the
level of detection (using anal]
i par kilogram or th
i (using analytical
sibed in SW-846),
whichever is higher, shall be used. The
levels specified in appendix VH of this
pert (and the default level of 0.002
micrograms par kilogram or the level of
detection for constituents as identified
in Note 1 of appendix VH of this
chapter) era administratively stayed
under the condition, for those
constituents specified in paragraph
(bKD of this section, that the owner or
operator complies with alternative
levels defined as the land disposal
restriction limits specified in S 268.43 of
for FO39 nonwastewaters.
m complying with those alternative '
levels, if an owner or operator is unable
to detect a constituent despite
operator is deemed to be in compliance
for that constituent Until new guidance
or standards are developed, the owner
or operator may demonstrate such good-
taith efforts by achieving a detection
limit far the constituent that does not
exceed an order of magnitude above the
level provided by $268.43 far FO39
. The stay will remain in
EPA, we nonetheless strongly
is taken and notice is published in the
-------
FadaraJ Kagistar /Vol. AS.
Fadaral IsfMar and tha Cod* of
No. 31S / Tundty. Novamber 9. 1993 / Rules and Regulation* 59603
3. Appendix Vn of put 266 is
mandaa by designating the axisting
note at tin tad ofth* appandjx as nott
U. la part 271:
PAHT 2T1-«MOI«tllEMTS FOR
AUTHOHBEAT10N Or STATE '
TABLE 1.—REGULATIONS IMPLEMENT-
ING THE HAZARDOUS AND
WASTE AMENDMENTS OF 1984
Prom*
TM* of
tSSS&sssssK*— ^SXSSSSSZ""1" -?—.
AppaodixVIHAiBaadad)
EffacDw
/tatfcailr/i 42 UAC MOS. 69l3(a), and
Nat* a: Tha lavab tpadtel la late
•pptndte aad OM dafrait laval of O.OW
nuoqpaiu parUiognn or tba 1ml of
' diNctim faf oooitttiMfttiM WMtutod IB
Not* i of this appendix am admiaWnttMty
r tha oandttkB. to thoia
iat.UKbXl).tbat
aUBimatlwlafaaTdafiMdI at tha laad dfanosil
laaMdkM Umit* apadftad la f JM.43 ofthla
caaptar to PO39 aanwasianatais. Saa
2. Saction 271.1(0 !• amandadby
adding tha following anliy to Tablal in
cfaionological otdarby data of
publication in tba Fadanl KagiMr to
raad as follows:
§271.1
• •
0)« * •
eurmog pnawtFR Odobar
bar*. ofhai- paga 15.
1993.
(PK Dae. 93-MOtt fUad «-*-«3; MS ami
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
Revision Checklist 128 Summary •"
t
Rule Title:
Checklist Title:
Reference:
Promulgation Date:
Effective Date:
Cluster:
Provision Type:
Linkage:
Optional:
Hazardous Waste Management System; Identification and Listing
of Hazardous Waste; Wastes from Wood Surface Protection
Wastes From the Use of Chlorophenolic Formulations in Wood
Surface Protection
59 EB 458-469
January 4, 1994
January 4, 1994
RCRA Cluster IV
Non-HSWA
Revision Checklist 132; Related to Revision Checklist 82 but not
directly Jinked - see the summary
No
Summary: Three categories of wastes (F032, F034 and F035) from wood preserving
processes were listed as hazardous in 1990 (55 FR 50450; Revision Checklist 82). A final
listing determination for wood surface protection wastes was deferred due to lack of data (53
£B 53282). This present rule announces that upon reviewing the public comments received
on its proposal of April 27,1993 (58 FR 25707), EPA has decided not to list wastes from the
use of chlorophenolic formulations in wood surface protection processes. As a result of this
determination, EPA is not mandating in this rule any specific operating or information
collection requirements for owners/operators of wood surface protection plants. However,
the Agency would very likely re-evaluate this decision not to list if use of chlorophenolic
formulations resumes in the future. Although this final rule does not list as hazardous any
wastes from wood surface protection processes, EPA believes that certain constituents
contained in these wastes warrant inclusion in 40 CFR Part 261, Appendix VIII. Thus, the
Agency is adding the following four chemicals to Part 261, Appendix VIII: the sodium and
the potassium salts of pentachlorophenol and of tetrachlorophenol. This rule also finalizes the
proposed amendment of SW-846 ("Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,
Physical/Chemical Methods") to include Method 4010 (Immunoassay Test for the Presence
of Pentachlorophenol).
State Authorization: This rule is placed in RCRA Cluster IV and the changes addressed by it
were made under non-HSWA authority. The State modification deadline is July 1,1995 (or
July 1,1996 if a State statutory change is necessary). These changes do not go into effect
until States become authorized for them because this rule was promulgated under pre-HSWA
authorities. Only final authorization is available.
The State Revision Application must include applicable regulations, AG statement addendum.
Revision Checklist 128, other associated checklists and other application materials, i.e. a
program description and an MOA, as determined by the Regional office.
Attorney General's Statement Entry: The following new entry should be placed at Subsection
I A (27) in the Model Revision Attorney General's Statement.
DSUM128.15-12/21/94
(Printed. 12/21/941
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
Revision Checklist 128 Summary (cont'd)
(27) Listing of three chemicals from wood surface protection processes, 40
CFR 261 Appendix VIII, as amended January 4, 1994 [59 FR 4581,
Revision Checklist 128.
The following new entry should be placed at Subsection I CC in the Model Revision Attorney
General's Statement.
CC. State statutes and regulations incorporation by reference "Test Methods
for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods," EPA Publication SW-846, the
Third Edition (November 1986), as amended by Updates I, II and IIA, as indicated in
Revision Checklist 128.
Federal Authority: RCRA 5 §2002(a), 3001 (b), and 3001 (e)(1); 40 CFR 260.11 (a) as
amended January 4, 1994 (59 F_R 458).
Citation of Laws and Regulations; Date of Enactment and Adoption
Remarks of the Attorney General
I
DSUM128.15 - 12/21/94
(Print**: 12/21/94)
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA IS
RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 128
**
Wastes From the Use of Chlorophenolic Formulations
in Wood Surface Protection
59 £R 458-469
January 4, 1994
(RCRA Cluster IV, Non-HSWA provisions)
FEDERAL REO.UWEMENTS
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
t
PART 260 - HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM: GENERAL
SUBPART B - DEFINITIONS
REFERENCES
revise the reference to
"Test Methods for
Evaluating Solid
Waste,
Physical/Chemical
Methods* by replacing
"[Third Edition
(September, 1 986), as
amended by Update 1
(July 1992)]" with
"(Third Edition
(November, 1 986), as
amended by Updates I,
II and II A)"; in the
second sentence.
replace "Update 1"
with "Updates 1, II and
HA"; remove the last
sentence regarding
where copies may be
inspected
260. 11 (a)
January 4, 1994 - Page 1 of 2
DCL128.15
01/25/94
Pnnt«d 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 128: Wastes From the Use of Chlorophenolic
Formulations in Wood Surface Protection (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
f
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQIHV-
ALENT
LESS
STRHt-
GENT
MORE
STRW-
GEKT
BROAol^
IN SCOPE
PART 261 - IDENTIFICATION AND LISTING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
' APPENDIX VIII TO PART 261
HAZARDOUS CONSTITUENTS
add the specified
hazardous constituents
in alphabetical order as
shown below:
Appendix VIII
ChMical Abstracts rant No.
Chemical
abstracts
No.
Hazardous
waste
Potassium pentachlorophanate
* *
PantachlorophanoL, potassiin salt
* « *
7778736
Nona
Sodiun pentach I or ophenate
* * *
2,3,4,6-tetrachlorophenol,
potassiuB salt
2,3,4,6-tetrachlorophenol ,
sodium salt
* * *
Pentachlorophenol, sodiun salt
* * » «
sane
• * * *
131522
*
53535276
255675S9
*
None M
* . ™
None
None
»
Note the date (November 1986) given in the fjj appears to be an error because the date on
the third edition of SW-836 is September 1986 as was indicated in the Federal Register (58
FR 46040; August 31, 1993) addressed by Revision Checklist 126.
January 4. 1994 - Page 2 of 2
DCL128.15 -RcviM* 01/26/34
Prim** 12/21/94
-------
t
Tuesday
January 4, 1994
PartV
Environmental
Protection Agency
40 CFR Parts 260 and 261
Hazardous Waste Management System;
Identification and Usting of Hazardous
Waste; Wastes From Wood Surface
Protection; Final Rule
-------
•458 Federal Register / Vol. 59; No. 2 / Tuesday. January 4. 1994 / Rules and Regulations
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AQENCY
40 CFR Parts 260 and 261
{FRI.-4WM-*]
Systam; Identification and Listing of
Hazardous Way; Wastes From Wood
Surface Protection
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency. • .-
WHOM; Final rule.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) is issuing a
final hazardous waste listing
determination for wastes generated from
the use of chlorophenolic formulations
in wood surface protection processes.
Upon reviewing the public comments
received on its proposal of April 27.
1993, the Agency has decided not to list
wastes from the use of chlorophenolic
formulations in wood surface protection
processes. As a result, of this
determination. EPA is not mandating in
this rule any specific operating or
information collection requirements for
owners/operators of wood surface
.protection plants. If, however, use of •
chlorophenolic formulations resumes in
the future, the Agency would very likely
re-evaluate.this decision not to list. This
rule also finalizes the proposed
amendment of SW-646 ('Test Methods
for Evaluating Solid Waste. Physical/
Chemical Methods") to include Method
4010 (Irnmunoassay Test for the
Presence of Pentachlorophenol). In
addition, the Agency is adding the
following four chemicals to 40 CFR part
261. Appendix VHfc Sodium and
potassium salts of penlachlorophenol
and tetradilorophenol.
EFFECTIVE DATR January 4.1994.
ADDRESSES; The official record for this
rulemaking is identified as Docket •
Number F-93-F33F-FFTFF and is
located in the EPA RCRA Docket, room
M2616.401M Street. SW.. Washington.
DC 20460. The public must make an
appointment to review docket materials
by calling (202) 260-0327. The docket is
open from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m.. Monday
through Friday, excluding holidays. The
public may copy up to 100 pages from
the docket at no cost. Additional copies
cost $0.t5 per page.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
general information, contact the RCRA/
Superhind Hotline at {800) 424-9346
(toll-free) or (703) 920-9810 in the
Washington, DC metropolitan area. The
TDD hotline number is (800) 553^7672
or (703) 486-3323. For technical
information on specific aspects of this
rulemaking. contact Mr. David ). Carver
at (202) 260-6775. Office of Solid Waste
(Mailcode 5304). U.S. EPA. 401 M
Street, SW.. Washington. DC 20460.>For
technical information relating to the
amendment of SW-846. contact Ms.
Gail Hansen at (202) 26CM761. Office of
Solid Waste (Mailcode 5304). at .the
same address provided above.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
contents of today's preamble are listed
in the following outline:
I. Lngal Authority
II. Background ft Summary
111. Overview of the Proposed Rule
IV. Summary of Public Comment* and
Responses
A. General Comments
B. Comments Regarding Risk Asse**menl
V. Overview of the Final Rule
A. Basis for the Determination Not to List
As Hazardous Waste* From Wood
• Surface Protection Operation*
B. Operating Requirement* for Surface
Protection Plants
C Addition of Chemicals to Appendix VIII
of 40 CFR pan 261
VI. Amendment of SW-M6 (Test Methods for
Evaluating Solid Waste. Physical/
Chemical Methods}
VII. Pollution Prevention and Waste
Minimization
VIII. Analysis of Potential Costs and Benefits
A. Executive Order Requirements
& Description of Costs and Benefits of this
Rule
IX. State Authority
X. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
XI. Paperwork Reduction Act
L Legal Authority
These regulations are being
promulgated under the authority of
sections 2002(a) and 3001 (b) and (e)(t)
of the Solid Waste Disposal Act. as
amended. 42 U.S.C 6912(a). 6921 (b)
and (e)(1).and 6922 (commonly referred
to as RCRA).
n. Background ft Summary
A. Background
Under section 300l(e) of RCRA. as
amended by the Hazardous and Solid
Waste Amendments of 1984 (HSWA)..
EPA is required to make a hazardous
waste listing determination for wastes
containing chlorinated dioxins and
dibenzofurans. As part of this mandate.
the Agency began an investigation in
1988 of dioxin-containing wastes from
wood preserving and wood surface
protection processes. Three categories of
wastes from wood preserving processes
were listed as hazardous wastes in 1990.-
(F032. F034. and F035. see 55 FR
50450). A final listing determination for
wood surface protection process wastes
were deferred due to lack of data (53 FR
53282). In 1991. the Agency began a
separate study of the surface protection
industry in an effort to obtain sufficient
information upon which to base a
hazardous waste listing determinaiiort.
The Agency, upon obtaining and
evaluating information, published a
proposed rule on April 27,1993 which
proposed a concentration-based
hazardous waste listing option and
requested comment on an alternative
option not lo list these wastes as
hazardous (58 FR 25707). Details of the
options can be found in the following
section to this preamble! A detailed
summary of all Agency actions related
to wood surface protection wastes was
provided in the April 27.1993 proposal
(58 FR 25707). The reader is encouraged
to consult that document for more
information on the wood surface
protection rulemaking history.
In accordance with a proposed
consent decree signed by EPA and the
Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) in
£DFv. Browner (U.S. District Court for
the District of Columbia, case no. 89-
0591). the Agency has agreed lo make a
final listing determination for
chlorophenolic wastes front wood
surface protection processes by
December 31,1993.
B. Summary of the Wood Surface
Protection Regulation
After considerable review and study
. of the rulemaking docket for this action,
including comments received on the
proposal, the Agency has determined
that listing as hazardous wastes from
surface protection operations is
unnecessary and will not yield the
benefits intended by a hazardous waste
listing under the RCRA program. This
section summarizes elements of the
proposed rule of April 27.1993 (58 FR
25707). and details the conclusions
reached in developing this final rule.
The reader is cautioned that although
some of the highlights brought up in the
proposed rule are described below, the
majority of information on the industry
itself as well as the detai led risk
assessment on which the initial
proposed rule was based is found in the
preamble and background documents to
the proposed rule. The information
contained in this final rule is primarily
concerned with developments
subsequent to the proposed rule. This
rule describes, in detail, the Agency's
justification for not listing wastes from
surface protection processes that use
chlorophenolic formulations. In
addition, it summarizes the Agency's
response to comments received on the
proposal.
f
-------
Federal Register / Vol. 59. No. 2 / Tuesday. January 4. 1994 / Rules and Regulations 459
s
m. Overview of the Proposed Rule
The April 27,1993 proposal
discussed and requested comment on
each of the following:
(1} Proposing a concentration-based
hazardous waste listing for certain wood
surface protection wastes.
(2) Proposing various testing, analysis,
recordkeeping requirements and
management standards for wood surface
protection plants,
(3) Adding six hazardous constituents
to appendix VH! of 40 CFR part_261,
(4) Amending of ap
CFR part 261 by adding F033 and the
hazardous constituents found in the
wastes,
(5) Modifying the Comprehensive
Environmental Response.
Compensation, and Liability Act
(CERCLA) list of hazardous substances
to reflect the newly proposed listing.
(6) Amending SVY-446 ("Test
Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,
Physical/Chemical Methods") to
include Method 4010 (Immunoassay
Test for the Presence of
Pentachlorophenol). and
(7) An alternative option not listing
chlorophenolic wastes as hazardous.
The Agency proposed to list as
hazardous at 40 CFR 261.31 only those
wastes from wood surface protection
processes using a formulation with a
pentachiorophenate concentration
greater than 0.1 ppm. Under this
proposed option, surface protection
operations using formulations with
pentachiorophenate concentrations
equal to or less than 0.1 ppm would not
generate F033 listed wastes. The Agency
proposed this concentration-based
listing because it had information which
suggested that many surface protectors
who previously used chlorophenolics
did not sufficiently clean out equipment
prior to abandoning the use of
chlorophenolics. Because of this, many
formulations from past users of
chlorophenolics exhibit "cross-
contamination." the contamination of
current formulations by dioxins and
chlorophenolic compounds from old
formulations. The rule proposed the
following hazardous waste listing
description for the F033 waste code and
included the following specific waste
streams from process operations:
F033:Process residuals, wastewatm that
come into contact with protectant. discarded
spent formulation, and protectant drippage
from wood surface protection pruteuet at
plants that use surface protection chemicab
having an in-process formulation
concentration of pentachlorophenale.
(expressed as pentachlorophenol during
analysis) exceeding 0.1 ppm. CT)
Along with this option, various
testing and recordkeeping requirements
were proposed. For an owner/operator
to demonstrate that he/she is not
generating F033 wastes, EPA proposed
formulation testing requirements for all
surface protection plants. All owner/
operators of wood surface protection
plants would be required to test their
formulation to determine the .
concentration of pentachiorophenate if
the owner/operators wanted to avoid
generating FD33 wastes. If the analysis
showed a concentration at or below 0.1
ppm, the owner/operator would be
required to sign a certification to that
effect and maintain records on site
related to the testing procedure. This
testing proposed an analysis using a
method listed within the EP A's Test
Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste.
Physical/Chemical Methods (SW-846).
The Agency proposed to add Method
4010 to SW-846. Method 4010 is an
immunoassay test for the presence of
pentachlorophenol. which determines
whether a sample is above or below a
set limit (such as the 0.1 ppm
concentration level proposed).
Under the proposal, it analysis
showed that a facility's formulation
contains pentachiorophenate at levels
exceeding 0.1 ppm, then the wastes
generated from surface protection at that
facility would be P033 wastes and the
owner/operator would be subject to
additional operating requirements
proposed as subpart T of parts 264 and
265. For details on the specific
operating requirements, the reader
should refer to the proposed notice (58
FR 25706).
A number of the constituents of
concern that ate present in wastes
generated from wood surface protection
processes which use cnloropnenolic
formulations do not appear on the list
of hazardous constituents at 40 CFR part
261. appendix VTJL The Agency
proposed to add six hazardous
constituents to appendix VHL- sodium
pentachiorophenate, potassium
pentachiorophenate. the sodium salt of
2.3.4.6-tetnchlorophenol. the potassium
salt of 2.3.4.6-tetnchlorophenol,
octadilorodibenzo-p-dioxin (COX)) and
octachlorodibeiuohiran (OCDF).
Sodium and potassium
pentachiorophenate are the sodium and
potassium salts of pentachlorophenol.
These salts were proposed for addition
to appendix VHI of 40 CFR pert 281
since, as a result of gastric secretions
following ingestion, the sodium and
potassium salts of pentachlorophenol
and 2,3,4,6-tetrachlorophenolare
readily converted to the corresponding
phenols by acidification. Therefore, the
sodium and potassium salts are
reasonably expected to elicit the same
health effects as the corresponding
phenols. For this reason, the Agency
proposed to add these four compounds
to the list of hazardous constituents in
appendix VIII of 40 CFR part 261.
The Agency also requested comment
on an option not to list as hazardous
wastes generated from surface
protection processes. The Agency
included the so-called "no-list" option
in the proposal because the future
generation of chlorophenolic wastes is
expected to diminish rapidly to zero
and because the results of risk analyses
show that the risks from the dominant
exposure pathways are relatively
modest, assuming the widespread use of
chlonphenoltc formulations does not
resume. The Agency believed at the
time of the proposal that reintroduction
of chlorophenolic formulations into the
market place in the future was not likely
to occur. EPA also noted that the
Agency would always have the option
of reconsideri
ring the listing
n should chlorophenolic
determination sou coropenoic
surface protection formulations be
reintroduced in the future.
TV. Summary of Public Comments and
Responses
Comments received on the proposed
rule are placed under two separate
headings for purposes of this summary.
The Gist addresses the more general
comments associated with the proposal.
including those relating to: (i) General
implementation issues of a listing for
wastes generated by the wood surface
protection industry; (2) technical
approaches discussed in the proposal
relating to data sampling methodologies:
and (3) various engineering assumptions
on which the proposed listing was
based. The second part of this section
describes the Agency's response to
comments dealing with the risk
assessment methodology used to
support the listing determination for
these wastes.
A. General Comments
Several comments were submitted on
the proposed listing of F033 wastes.
Four commenters supported the listing
in general and two commenters
supported the concentration-based
approach in particular. Three
commenters opposed the proposed
listing and urged EPA to rely on its
authority under FTFRA to control the
risks posed by chlorophenolic
formulations. One commenter
supported an outright ban on the use of
chlorophenolics for wood surface
treatment.
Two commenters warned that listing
F033 wastes would hinder remediation
efforts at contaminated wood surface
protection sites. The Agency agrees with
-------
460 Federal Register / Vol. 59. No. 2 / Tuesday. January 4. 1994 / Rules and Regulations
the commenters' point that a hazardous
waste listing may provide a disincentive
for owner/operators of surface
protection plants to initiate voluntary
remediation efforts. The regulation of
potentially large amounts of
contaminated soil as listed hazardous
waste could delay the start of cleanup
due to the administrative and economic
realities of regulatory compliance.
Three commenters expressed concern
over the possibly perceived
interchangeability of the proposed 0.1
ppm concentration level and the
Toxicity Characteristic (TC) regulatory
level for. pentachlorophenol. Although
the Agency is not finalizing the F033
hazardous waste listing, EPA
nevertheless wants to make clear that
the concentration level proposed in the
F033 listing description was not
intended as a regulatory level for any
purpose other than defining a waste as
P033. The currant regulatory level for
pentachlorophenol that defines a waste
as hazardous under the TC (100 mg/L)
would not have been affected by this
rulemaking in any way had the F033
listing been promulgated today. Levels
set for the TC are obtained by running
models which simulate acidic landfill
conditions. For the proposed listing, the
proposed 0.1 ppm level was calculated
using a Maximum Contaminant Level
(MCL) of 0.001 ppm and a risk analysis
using the Agency's Multi-med model.
Multi-med simulates groundwater
contamination Gram specific sources.
and for this proposal, it incorporated
variables which are specific to sawmill
conditions. The Agency's analysis
approximated the dilution of
pentachlorophenate from the time the
waste contacts the ground to when it
reaches a ground water well. The
Agency did not arrive at the 0.1 ppm
level by applying a dilution attenuation
factor (DAF) of 100 (as the Agency has
done in other circumstances) to the
MCL, Indeed, the Agency did not take
a position in the proposal about the use
of DAFs in calculating acceptable risk
levels for any constituents. A detailed
discussion of the Agency's modeling
assumptions and actual parameters used
to generate risk approximations can be
found in the docket for die proposed
rule.
One commenter expressed
reservations regarding the
decontamination procedures
promulgated previously for wood
preserving equipment (55 FR 50482-
50483, December 6,1990). The Agency
is aware that equipment cleaning will
not always prevent cross-contamination.
However, it will certainly reduce the
amou'nt of contamination thai would
occur if no equipment cleaning look
place. Although the Agency is not
finalizing the proposed F033 hazardous
waste listing. EPA encourages owner/
operators ofsurface protection plants to
clean or replace any surface-treating
equipment that was used previously
with chlorophenolic formulations upon
a switch to non-chlorophenolic
chemicals and properly dispose of the
wastes in an environmentally sound
manner. Furthermore, the Agency has
obtained information which shows that
some new substitute products are more
effective if residual chlorophenolic
contamination is removed. Hence.
removing sludge and cleaning
equipment from previous
chlorophenolic use will not only be
more environmentally sound, but may
also enhance the new products
effectiveness. Methodology on
recommended cleaning and operating
practices for surface protectors will be
published in the near future by the
Agency in a pollution prevention and
waste minimization guidance
document.
One commenter suggested that the
proposed operating standards for
surface protection plants be codified in
part 262 as opposed to parts 264/265.
The commenter reasoned that most
surface protection plants are only
generators and do not function as
treatment, storage, and disposal
facilities fTSDFs). However, since the
F033 hazardous waste listing is not
being promulgated, this issue is moot
and then is no need for special
generator requirements.
Several commenters had specific
concerns about the applicability of the
proposed F033 listing. Since the Agency
is not finalizing the proposed F033
listing, these concerns are also moot.
However, when appropriate, answers
specific to each of these comments have
been addressed in the background
document of this final rule.
One commenter questioned the
representativeness of the Agency's data
on cross-contamination. The commenter
stated thai because sites wen not
randomly selected, there is no true
sample representation of the surface
protector population. EPA did not
choose sampling sites based on their
statistical representativeness. Rather.
the sites were selected as appropriate
from what the Agency considered to be
typical operating plants. The Agency
visited more than 15 surface protection
sites in the Nation {both large and small
plants). From the information obtained
from these plant tours and interviews.
the Agency developed a view of what i'
considered typical from an engineering
standpoint (e.g. size of equipment.
production scale, presence of
containment systems, size of storage
yards, amount of drippage, etc). The
sites sampled need not represent the
entire surface protection industry in
terms of the process used and the degree
of cross-contamination present to allow
the Agency to demonstrate that Wastes
from current and previous use of
chlorophenolics at surface protection
sites were contaminated with the
constituents of concern. These sites
were chosen from information obtained
by a questionnaire sent out under the
Agency's 3007 RCRA authority.
B. Comments Regarding Risk
Assessment
Five commenters responded to the
risk assessment presented in the
.proposed rule. One commenter stated
that the EPA incorrectly converted units
of measurement in the record sampling
data used for the risk assessment
causing the overestimation of
incremental risk for the fish/shellfish
consumption and soil ingestion
pathways by a 1.000-fold. The EPA
agrees with the commenter. The dioxin
concentrations in the formulation at one
of the affected facilities (Aquasco. MD)
were reported in the wrong units,
causing a 1,000-fold error to be
incorporated into the risk estimates for
the fish and shellfish ingestion and soil
ingestion scenarios. When this error is
corrected, the TCDD-TEQ dioxin levels
used as the source concentration (the
concentration of formulation dripping
onto the ground) for affected facilities
(cross-contamination from past use of
chlorophenolic formulations) and used
in the lifetime individual risk estimates
for the soil ingestion scenario and fish
and shellfish ingestion scenario were
reduced by a 1.000-fold. The lifetime
individual risk values using the
corrected data are presented in Table 1.
I
-------
Federal Register / Vol. 59, No. 2 / Tuesday, January 4. 1994 / Rules and Regulations
461
TABLE 1.—INDIVIDUAL RISK FROM CROSS-CONTAMINATION FROM PAST USAGE OF CHLOROPHENOUC FORMULATIONS
FROM FISH AND SHELLFISH INGESTION
Population
Constituent
234 7,8-TCDD TEQ '
RecreatM
e
Central
tend-
ency
2E-12
xial fish-
's
**£
end
3E-11
General
latx
Central
tend-
ency
8E-13
popu-
XI
High
end
1i-11
MS Me
seriisk.
t
The estimated risk to any one
individual using the corrected values
are 1.000-fold lower than the risk
estimated in the proposed rule from
cross-contamination due to past use. In
this case for the typically exposed
individual in the general population.
the incremental risk of developing
cancer is a chance of 0.8 in a trillion
(8E-13): in the recreational fisher
person, the risk of developing cancer is
increased by only 2E-12. The estimated
incremental population risk is also
reduced, after correction, approximately
by a 1.000-fold, to 0.0002 cases/70 years
for the anticipated increase in the
development of cancer as a result of
exposure to ingestion of fish/shellfish
contaminated with wastes from the use
of chloraphenolic formulations for
wood surface protection. Chan 1 in
Section V Part A of this final rule shows
the original values reported in the April
27.1993 proposed notice.
The soil ingestion scenarios also were
based on the storage yard soil
concentrations. The soil ingestion
scenario assumed that children ages l to
6 could come into contact with the
contaminated soil at the sawmill sites
because sawmill sites could be
converted to rural residential land use
and the child's play area could be
located on the area previously used as
a storage yard area. The lifetime
individual risks, using the corrected
formulation concentration values for
dioxin. associated with the soil
ingestion scenario for cross-
contamination from past users of
chlorophenolic formulations are
presented in Table 2.
TABLE 2.—INDIVIDUAL RISK FROM
CROSS-CONTAMINATION FROM PAST
USAGE OF CHLOROPHENOLIC FOR-
MULATIONS FROM DIRECT SOIL IN-
GESTION
Source
Constituent:
2.3.7.8-TCDD
TEOV
Storage yard
Central
tendency
7E-10
High end
2E-8
' Upper bound excess lifetime cancer risk.
The estimates presented in Table 2
show that the incremental risks from
direct soil ingestion by children are
below what the Agency considers a
level of concern. A child exposed to
storage yard soils cross-contaminated by
past users of chlorophenolics under
typical conditions (consumption of 0.1
gram of soil/day for 160 days/year for
six years) would be subject to an
increased cancer risk of 7E-10 over a
lifetime, or a chance of 0.7 in a billion.
The estimated incremental population
risk is also reduced approximately
1.000-fold (to 4E-7 cases per year over
a 70-year period) for the anticipated
increase in the development of cancer as
a result of exposure to direct ingestion
of soil contaminated with wastes from
the use of cross-contaminated
formulations for wood surface
protection.
One commenter remarked that the
EPA failed to specifically address the
incremental risks to subsistence fisher
persons from consumption offish/
shellfish contaminated from the use of
chlorophenolic formulations for wood
surface protection. EPA agrees that the
risks to highly exposed sub-populations
should be considered. The fish ingestion
scenarios developed for the proposed
rule considered exposure to a general
population and recreational fisher at the
outflow of a drainage area containing
surface protection facilities.
EPA used the analysis for the high
end recreational fisher to approximate
the risk to the subsistence fisher. Recent
data show that the high end ingestion
rate for a subsistence fisher is greater
than for a recreational fisher by a factor
of approximately 2. Therefore, the
incremental risk for a subsistence fisher
would not .exceed a level of concern,
since the projected risk to recreational
fishers is much less than 10-*.
The analysis of risks from fish
consumption assumes that all fish in the
drainage basin are contaminated. The
estimates of PCODs and PCDFs in fish
tissue are based on sediment
concentrations of these constituents.
The sediment concentrations are
estimated based on the erosion of
contaminated soils from Sawmill sites in
a river or stream basin and subsequent
dilution of contaminant levels by the
erosion of uncontaminated soils from
the corresponding drainage basin.
The projected nsk levels increase as
the size of the drainage area decreases,
due to the relatively lower amounts of
uncontaminated soil in smaller drainage
basins. EPA performed an analysis
which shows that, even with all
exposure parameters set at values which
would maximize the overall estimate of
exposure, in order to reach a risk level
of 10-*, the drainage area would need
to be 8.000 hectares or less, which .is
smaller than the smallest drainage area
in the country. The average drainage
area is 440.000 hectares, and the lower
fifth percentile of the size distribution,is
109,000 hectares.
With regard to the fish/shellfish
ingestion scenario, one commenter
maintained that the fish/shellfish
ingestion scenario should have been
performed on a site-specific basis (i.e.
EPA should have used parameters seen
at individual sites), because not all
sawmills are located on streams with
commercial fisheries. The EPA chose
the fish/shellfish ingestion scenario to
be protective of the recreational fisher
persons and the general population. The
risk analysis was structured so that the
hydrologic cataloguing unit (or
watershed) was the basic unit of
analysis to ensure that the contaminated
sediment would be associated with a
body of water large enough to support
-------
4S2 Federal Kegjrter / Vol.- 58. No. 2 y Tuesday. January 4, 1994 / Rules and KeguhMtoos
fish hatdmies and recreational fisher
persons. When these assumptions were
Used in the fish/shellfish ingestion
scenario using corrected values for •
rfioxin found in formulation for PCDDs
and PCDPs. the incremental risk to
individuals with high-end exposures
remains well below JxtO-*.
With regard to the Universal Soil Los*
Equation (USLE), one commenter
asserted that the equation is overly
conservative for estimating soi! erosion
from surface protection sites. This
equation models the amount of soil
which is dumped into a drainage area
containing fish. For • mote- detailed.
description of the model, the loader is
referred to background document of the
proposed rule. The EPA believes that. •
although this may be a conservative
approach, it is the best method currently
available, k has been used to support
other EPA rutemakings and guidance
documents. The most notable example
being the Assessment of Risks from
Exposure of Humans. Terrestrial end
Avian WildBfe. and Aquatic Lift to
Dioxins end Pimm, from Disposal and
Use of Sludge from Bleached Kraft and
SulHte Pulp and Paper Mills.' Even
using these conservative assumptions.
the incremental risks from cross-
contamination at these sites are not at s
•—> -» - -
HfWB Ol COIIGWIl.
One commenter suggested that the
population risks attributable lo the
contaminated Bsh/sheHRsh ingestion
scenario were too high because the
entire U.S. population was considered
to be eat posed. EPA disagrees and
believes it is appropriate to consider the
consumption fate of the entire
population in estimating risk lo the
geneml population front this exposure'
pathway. However, MI adjustment of 0.4
was made lo the diet fraction to account
for the fact diet not a» fish am
contaminated. Thus, only seme
peiumtoga of die population wouMfae
•fleeted by the contaminated fish. As
discussed in the Risk Assessment
Background Document for the
rule, the O.4 diet fraction was derived by
estimating the peicentage of rivers and
streams (i.e.. cataloguing units) that
have at least one sawnriH. A second
adjustment was made m the calculation
of population risk to account for the
percentage of sawmills that operate
surface protection processes fabout 30%
'En
•Man Agency, 1990.
feom EapoMi* of Hvmra.
Funn*. from DwpoMl and UM «i Studf* *«•
BlMCiwd Knft *nd Svtfte Ptolpaad Pipa Milfc.
Fttpmd for MM Office of Ttaie SiibMMCM.
of (he entire •umber of sawmills
nationally)- Popuietioit risk for the fish/
shellfish ingestion scenario has been
recalculated for the final rule using the
corrected incremental storage yard soil
TCDD-TEQ concentrations. The
corrected estimate of incremental
population risk from i
contamination is three orders* of
magnitude tower than the risk originally
stated in the proposed rule. The
corrected number of cancer cases
expected in 70 years is now 0.0002.
One commenler asserted thai the soil
«*
conservative because all of the soil
consumption was attributed lo
contaminated storage yard soil and no
consumption of "indoor dust" was
considered. EPA considered only the
consumption of storage yard soil in
order to be protective of human hearth.
The range of soil ingestion rates for
average children aged 1 through 6 is
pieaenled m the EPA's Exposure Factors
Handbook (1990) as 0.2 to 0.8 grams per
day. These estimated values were
determined from the clay content of
- focal samples taken BOA duMiaB M
this age group and thus represent
consumption of soil. However, the
percent of this consumption that is
attributed to house dust Is unknown, as
is the contaminant concentration in the
house dust. The EPA has recalculated
the soil
corrected
stk
TCDD-TEQ
obtained from the
formulation sample. The incremental
risk estimated is below 1E-6. using the
conservative assumptions. The Agency's
risk levels an perticuhuiy protective
with the use of these conservative
assumptions, thereby further lending
support to the Agency's decision not to
list these wastes.
One commenter stated that children
are unlikely to consume sediment at the
same rate that they consume soil The
Agency agrees, hot notes that sediment
consumption by children was not
considered as an exposure pathway in
the propeuod rale. The Agency does not
feel that thin exposure path way is a
significant one in making a
determination whether or not to list
chiorophenotic wastes since the
exposwe areas of concern are relatively
small and any land conversion which
could take place would most Kkery
feowuv soil testing pnor to tend
-IS. EPA MB*! VS
One commenter staled that the
assumptions used to estimate the
exposed population fevtbe soil ingestion
population risk scenario greatly
overestimate the «usaber el exposed
ckttkbw. EPA behaves that the scenario
atay he conservative, twt net
impbmswls. The scenario assumes that
all sawmill sites are converted to rural
residential land use, that the children's
plfty areas are located on the site of the
former storage yards, and that the homt**
are resold to new families with young
children every 25 years. These
assumptions include a low population
density in these areas. It would take
only a limited number of sites to be
converted to suburban housing or to
daycare or school facilities to cause a
substantial increase in the exposed
population. The incremental population
risk estimated using the corrected
incremental value for the storage yard
soil TCDD-TEQ concentration is 4E-7
cases in 70 years, three orders of
magnitude lower then that in the
proposed rule.
One commenter maintained thai the
soil ingestion scenario was quest ionabi*
because Superfund liabilities, stale
laws, and lender requirements make
land use changes unlikely without site
cleanup activities. The EPA agrees thai.
in some states, land transfers and
subsequent land use changes would b«
unlikely to occur without cleanup.
However, not all states are equally
diligent in requiring site investigations
at the time of property transfer, making
the types of hmd use changes described
in the soil ingestion scenario pteusiM*
Because of this, EPA believes it is
entirely appropriate to assess risk via
the soil ingestion pathway,
notwithstanding any risk management
decisions that may be made at some
future time to address the risk.
Two coramenters believed that some
of the values used as input parameters
to the ground-water model (i.e. recharge
rate, regional conductivity, and average
depth to water) were too conservative
and that more appropriate Htput
parameters should be used m this
MULTMED model One commenter
believed that the Agency had used
DRASTIC |a name grvea to a modelling
program used to evaluate the potential
which may exist rerun tug from
grouadwater poHutsoa) to perform its
groundwater modeling. Pint, the EPA
did not use the DRASTIC model to this
rulemaking effort; it used the
MULTIMED model developed by the
Agency to perform giounoWter models.
The Agency did, however, use some soil
and hydrogeologic information (on
hydrogeologic regions and subregions
collected by Alter et ol. (1988)) which is
used when applying the DRASTIC
model. With regard to the parameters
felt by the commenter to be loo
conservative, the EPA supports the
values used in the proposed rule (58 FR
at 25706 of April 27.1993). This
hydrogeoiogic information includes
t
-------
Federal Register / Vol. 59. No. 2 / Tuesday, January 4, 1984 / Rules and Regulations
463
t
many of the input parameters required
to run the MULTIMED model, and
includes such parameters as depth to
water, soil type and hydraulic
conductivity, net recharge, aquifer
hydraulic conductivity. The EPA .
selected hydrogeologic subregions in the
northwest and southeast United States.
excluding subregions where sawmills
were not likely to be sited (e.g.,
mountain slopes or flanks). Since the
parameter value ranges presented in
Aller ef a/. (1988) are .based on
compilations of literature values and
expert opinion, the values should be
viewed as bounding ranges, and are not
sufficiently statistically rigorous to
estimate true means or parameter
distributions. For the average case, .
"typical" parameter values were
obtained by examining the ranges of
values in Aller et ol. (1988) for the
selected subregions only and selecting
values representing the central tendency
of the reported ranges. Similarly, high-
end values were selected to represent
the high end of the exposure
distribution, using the higher end of the
range of parameter values deemed likely
to occur by Aller et at. (1988). EPA
recognizes that there are limitations to
this approach, largely associated with
the non-statistical nature of the data.
The Agency believes, however, that this
data source is the best available at this
time for regional and subregional
estimates of the hydrogeologic
properties necessary to estimate
exposures through the ground-water
pathway.
Two commenters felt that the
Agency's use of input parameter values
used for well location and well intake
point were too conservative. EPA
derived the horizontal distance to wells
from the responses reported in the
RCRA's 3007 Industry Questionnaires.
Because information was not obtained
on the well type or construction, all
wells described in the questionnaire
were assumed to be possible sources of
drinking water and wen assumed to be
screened to the top of the aquifer, that
is, well water was asaumedlo be drawn
off the top of the aquifer where organics
are assumed to exist in greater
concentrations than when water is
drawn from the middle of the aquifer.
These assumptions an consistent with
similar conservative assumptions used
to develop other RCRA regulations, such
as the Toxirity Characteristic (55 FR
11798. March 29.1990).
Two commenters contended that
neither biodegradation or chemical
degradation rates wen considered in the
ground-water modeling of
pentachlorophenol contamination.
These commenters submitted studies
showing that biological and chemical
degradation of PCP can occur and that
adequate biological and chemical
degradation rates are available or can be
estimated from these studies. EPA has
reviewed these studies and agrees that
they do indicate that biological and
chemical degradation of PCP can occur.
The information submitted by the
commenters are results from laboratory
studies, reporting the results from
controlled experiments. However, EPA
does not agree that there is sufficient
information on unassisted field
degradation rates, the geochemical
factors that affect degradation, or their
spatial variability from site-to-site or
region-to-region to model degradation in
the field at generic or prototypical sites
for regulatory purposes. Moreover, the
existence of metabolites that would
confirm the occurrence of
biodegradation in the field has not been
firmly established. Therefore, EPA does
not believe the data warrant an
assumption that biodegradation does
occur at significant rates at most sites.
In addition, the toxicities of potential
degradation products have not been
characterized. Therefore, the EPA does
not believe it is appropriate to consider
these mechanisms in this nitanaking.
One commenter suggested that it
would be more appropriate to calculate
the average peek concentration of
pentechlorophenato In groundwater
used to reflect a 9-year exposure
duration by producing a breakthrough
curve of annual concentrations at a well
using the MULTIMED model and
calculate a series of 9-year or 10-year
moving averages. The moving averages
would be sorted in descending order
and a paper plot prepared. A preferred
percantile value could then be selected
as the concentration of concern. EPA
believes the current method of
calculating 10-year time-weighted
averages by averaging two 5-year
concentrations (including thf maximum
concentration and the highest adiacent
5-year value calculated from each model
run) is an appropriate approach for
estimating lifetime individual risk and
the Agency selected this approach to be
conservative and protective of human
health. The 30-year exposure duration
scenario uses a time-weighted 30-year
average concentration that includes the
maximum concentration. Population
risk estimates aggregated over 70 years
were based on a time-weighted 70-year
average concentration that includes the
maximum concentration.
One commenter believed that the
source concentration used by EPA for
PCP in the ground-water ingestion
scenario was too high because PCP is no
longer in use and, thus, the infiltration
to ground water would be reduced. The
commenter suggested that source
reduction also would occur from
erosion of surface soil containing PCP.
before it is leached and enters the
ground water. EPA addressed the fact
that PCP is no longer in use at most
facilities in its baseline risk estimates in
the proposed rule, which have been
revised in the final rule based on
comments received to reflect source
concentrations and pulse durations
(estimated time in which
pentachlorophenate is expected to be
present in substitute wood surface
protection product from time of
changeover) more representative of the
cross-contamination scenario. While
surface runoff and erosion may reduce
the amount of PCP available for leaching
to ground water, EPA has assumed, for
the purpose of its analysis, that any
reductions are negligible. The EPA
adopted this conservative assumption
mainly because of lack of data necessary
to quantify such a loss and its effects on
ground-water concentrations.
Furthermore, EPA does not believe that
surface water and erosion will
significantly reduce source leachate
concentrations. As formulation drips
onto the soil it will rapidly penetrate the
rail until the rail is saturated.
Subsequent rain events may wash off
contaminated surface soil, but will not
erode deeper soil horizons where most
of the contaminant mass resides. Thus.
EPA does not consider this assumption
to be overly conservative.
'One commenter noted that the results
of the ground-water analysis wen not
supported by actual resource damage
data. The Agency does not expect, nor
does it feel that it is needed, that ground
water PCP concentrations predicted by
MULTIMED would agree precisely with
the resource damage data. The resource
damage incidents presented in the
background document an intended to
illustrate that ground-water
contamination from PCP does occur at
sawmill facilities, and an not intended
as validation points for exposure
modeling. Resource damage data wen
obtained from monitoring and other
wells that happened to be in place at a
facility when the sampling was
conducted. There an a number of
possible reasons why sampling data
from the resource damage incidents may
not reflect well-water concentrations
predicted by the model, in particular the
location of the wells with regard to
plume centerline end ground-water flow
direction, and the timing of peak plume
concentrations at the wells.
The latter point is especially
important because, depending on
patterns of past PCP use and the well
-------
464
Federal Register / Vol. 5ft, No. 2 ' Tuesday, January 4. 1994 / Rules and Regulations
location, the peak concentration in the
plume may not have reached or may
have passed the well(s) sampled. In
these resource damage cases, sufficient "
information was not available to
determine the placement and design of
these wells with respect to the site's
hydrageology or possible plume
locations and travel time. Thus, it is not
possible to use these data points for
validation of model results. However, it
should be noted that the model-,
estimated ground-water PCP
concentrations in the final rule are
similar to those reported from resource
damage incidents. When the revised
avenge source concentration was used
in the ground-water model, the
estimated concentrations for PCP in
ground water (average • 0.005 mg/L;
high-end » 288 mg/L) are in a
reasonable agreement with the values
reported in the resource damage
accounts (<0.001 to 45 mg/L).
One conunanter disagreed with the
use of MULTIMED in that it was not as
"robust" or well-tested as the Monte
•Carlo-based EPACML model used for
the TC rule. Another commenter
recommends the use of the Monte Carlo
approach for all input parameters in the
modeling effort First, it is important to
note that the MULTIMED ground-water . of magnitude higher th
model is the same model as used in
EPACML except for the meaner in
which input parameters an specified.
EPACML can only be run in a
probabilistic. Monte Carlo mode, while
regions modeled. The Agency believes
that this approach is an appropriate one
and. furthermore, that the resulting
model estimates bracket or bound the
uncertainty associated with the model
input parameters.
Two commenters questioned the use
of cancer as the endpoinl of concern for
2,3.7,8-TCDD. EPA disagrees. The -
cancer endpoint for TCDD was selected
because it is the most sensitive endpoint
for which qualitative dose response data
are available. 2.3.7,8-TCDD has been
demonstrated to be a potent carcinogen
in animals and has been classified as a
B2 (potential human) carcinogen.
Recently published epidemiokogical
studies of occupationeUy exposed
individuals report significant increases
in cancer mortality. 2,3,7,8-TCDD also
has potent reproductive and teretogenic
endpoints and enough data exist to
estimate a reference dose (RID) based on
these alternative short-term effects. (For
a detailed discussion of this
information, and for references to
studies supporting these conclusions.
the reader is referred to the background
document of the proposed rule.)
However, if health-based levels IHBLs)
are calculated using the reproductive
effect RID. the exposure level is an order
d using the i
m the level
off
factor (CSF). Thus, if the
point is need aa the basis far calc
lating
so will
pro
MUL
.TIMED allows Monte Carlo runs as
well as for individual input parameters
to be specified T***^ fixed. The pmuiuft.
water Dow and transport
a permissible exposure level, it also will
be protective 1
reproductive effects.
The issue of 2A74-TCTJD toxkity is
ponenisere *t»» same for
MULTIMED and EPACML. Second, the
Agency did not pursue a probabilistic,
Mont* Carlo-based approach when
developing input parameters for this
modeling effort due to the feet that
iMinq this sophisticated technique
being reesseiaed by EPA (outside the
framework of this ruwmaking) and alt
using t
requires
speci
r
knowledge and proper
fiction of input parameter
I to express a wide
variety el effects including
teratogenesi*. reproductive effects, and
suppression of the immune system
function in many species. Mechanistic
approaches to
*
* mttA variable
and
toxic effects 1
independence or proper specification of
joint probability parameter
distributions. When these requirements
cannot be met. the Monte Carlo
approach will not provide batter '.
estimates than a scenario-based
approach i
EPA has adopted a scenario-based
regional nuwUtfa^ app
input parameters developed for regions
of the U.S. where sawmills are mow
prevalent In this approach. EPA uses
average and high-end values for
estimating modal
regional basis b
put porametnri oa *
use information does
not exist on the actual me
distribution* of these parameters for the
being considered. Until the
VBUCeSMflMBt pfOCMS IMS DMO
omapleMd. the EPA will continue to use
the current carrinogenicity endpoint
CSF value that has been accepted as the
basis for the MCL.
Two commentars noted limitations
associated with the useof theToxicity
Equivalence Factors (TEFs)
methodology. They argued that the TEF
methodology should not be e*ed to
justify the addition of appendix vm in
the absence of valid toxicotogical
studies thet demonstrate actual health
effects associated with exposure to these
compoiMdSk One cornnionssr' questioned
the proposal to add f
p-dioxintOCDD)aad
Octachtorodibenzofuran {OCDF) to 40
CFR part 261. appendix vni. The
commenten staled that neither
compound has been shown to produce
toxic, carcinogenic, rnutagehic or
teretogenic effects on humans or other
life forms. The Agency has decided not
to add, at this time, OCDD and OCDF to
appendix Via of 40 CFR pan 261.
Although the original basis for
including these congeners on appendix
Vin remains valid (details of which can
be found in the background document
supporting this final rulemaking). the
Agency is investigating further the
information submitted by the
comntenters regarding the effects of
OCDD and OCDF reported in the
Couture, Clwell, and Birnbaum study
used to support the decisions made in
the "Interim Procedures for Estimating
Risks Associated with Exposures of
Mixtures of Chlorinated Dibenzo-p-
dioxins and Dibenzofurans and the 19K9
Update". OCDD and OCDF are the most
prevalent of the PCDD and PCDF
congeners accounting for approximately
«5 percent of the total CDD and CDF
present in five of the six storage yard
soil samples. OCDD has been shown to
exhibit "dfoxhvlike" toxfefty in male
rats when administered in small doses
in a sub-chronic toxictty study.' These
findings have been confirmed by a
second sub-chronic study conducted in
female rats.* OCDD and OCDF have not
exhibited toxfdty m short term studies;
however, acute exposure is not the only
concern ef EPA. The Agency is
currently re-evaluating its original
assessment of risks from dioxin. At this
point, the Agency wishes to conclude its
on-going reassessment before adding
OCDD and OCDF to appendix Vffl of 40
CFR part 261.
One conunanter questioned the
conclusion that soil contamination
presents no risk to wildlife. The EPA
recognizes that concentrations that are
protective of humen health may not
necesaanry always be protective of
wildlife. However, fn view of the
relatively small areas occupied by
sawmills and the tow concentration of
TCDD-TEQ in storage yard soil from
cross contamination, the EPA believes
the incremental risks to wildlife will be
below a level of concern.
>Couturt. LA.. M. R. Elw«lL and 1_ S. BMBBMIM
DkKin-lik* ttttcu nt»«n«d id mate M* loljo»ing
i tOCDO)
j Applied
M. H Mf*.*n*C
I
IMS. pp. 22t-3M.
-------
Federal Register / Vol. 59, No. 2 / Tuesday. January 4. 1994 / Rules and Regulations
465
I
V. Overview of the Final Role
This final rule makes final the
Agency's hazardous waste listing
determination for chlorophenolic wastes
generated at wood surface protection
plants. EPA believes that listing as ;.
hazardous chlorophenolic wastes from
surface protection operations is
unnecessary for reasons described in
Part A of this preamble.
This document also amends SW-846
(Test Methods For Evaluating Solid
Waste. Physical/Chemical Methods) by
adding Method 4010 (immunoassay Test
for the Presence of Pentachlorophenol).
This action is discussed in Section VI of
this preamble.
This final rule also adds four
chemicals to the list of hazardous
constituents at 40 CFR part 261,
appendix VOL These four chemicals are:
(1) Sodium pentachlorophenate, (2)
potassium pentachlorophenate. (3)
sodium tetnchiorophenate, and (4)
potassium tetncb!orophenate.'A
discussion of this action is found in part
C of this section.
A. Basis for the Determination Not To
List as Hazardous Wastes From Wood
Surface Protection Operations
As discussed in the proposed rule, in
making a hazardous waste listing
determination, the Agency applies a
"weight-of-evidence" approach, n
doing this, the Agency examine* the
risks associated with all potential
human health and environmental
exposure pathways, analyzes trends in
the current industry, researches past
damage incidents, as well as other
factors found in 40 CFR 261.11.
Upon reviewing and responding to
comments received on the proposed
rule, the Agency has decided not to Bat
as hazardous wastes from the use of
chlorophenolic formulations in the
wood surface protection industry for
several reasons.
First chlorophenolic formulations am
no longer being produced in the United
States and the Agency believes it ia very
unlikely they will be produced in the
future. The only remaining producer of
chlorophenolics in the U.S.. Chapman
Chemicals, stopped production in
January of 1992 and sometime later
applied for voluntary cancellation of its
FIFRA product registration. A notice
describing this action was published in
the Federal Register on June 3.1992 (57
FR 23401), and « final cancellation
order was sent to Chapma
10S. and 101. and Mitrot G-ST. Any
manufacturer wishing to resume
production of chlorophenoUcs would (
have to obtain a new FIFRA registration
before these chemicals could be re-
introduced and made available for use
in wood surface protection. Currently.
there remains only one known user of
chlorophenoUcs in the U.S. out of an
estimated 1000 previous users and the
remaining plant's existing stock is
believed to be very limited. A major
element in the decision not to list as
hazardous chlorophenolic wastes
generated from the surface protection
industry is the fact that use of
chlorophenolic formulations has ceased.
EPA believes it is highly unlikely that
a manufacturer will seek reregistration
for this product for many reasons,
including the availability of effective
substitute products and the potentially
high financial and administrative
burdens imposed by the FIFRA
registration process. Additional
justification to support non-future
production is the fact that European
countries do not want to accept dioxin-
containing wood products which have
affected large export mills who will not
SOI
ic-formulations in the
with an effective date of September 14,
1992. This cancellation notice applies to
the following products produced by
Chapman Chemicals; Permatox 181.
future in part for this reason. Use of
chlorophenolics for surface protection
has declined steadily (even without the
influence of RCRA) from over 1.000
users to one user over the past decade.
Should a new registration of this
product be sought. EPA will consider
this surface protection risk analysis far
full strength application when
determining whether • new listing
determination under RCRA should be
Initiated. Currently, the Agency is aware
of nine available substitute products
currently being used by surface
protectors in place of chlorophenolics.
The substitute products an for a lane
part satisfactory to their users (as
mentioned on various sit* trips), end the
Agency does not feel as though a switch
back to cUonpheoolka ia likely.
A second reason why the Agency has
decided not to list these wastes is
because the risk to human health and
the environment from on-going
operations which previously used
chlorophenoUcs is shown to tail off
quickly because cbloropbenotic
concentrations diminish to a near zero
concentration within a short period of
time following switchover to an
alternate product The Agency has
determined that the use of full-strength
chlorophenolic formulations generates
wastes that result ia unacceptable risk
to human health and the environment
As before mentioned, should the use of
chlorophenolics for surface protection
applications resume, for any reason, the
Agency will most likely re-evaluate its
current position. However, dealing with
the current situation, them remains only
one known user of chlorophenoUcs with
a limited supply remaining.
Although the Agency believes the use
of full-strength chlorophenolics will be
phased out in the very near future, there
was concern at the time of proposal that
then may be unacceptable risks posed
by the use of substitute products that
become cross-contaminated from
previous chlorophenolic use.
Particularly, the proposal cited possible
ground water risks of 2*10-« for
individuals and a broad but very low
potential exposure risk due to surface
run-off contributing to dioxin levels in
fish. The Agency received several
comments addressing these potential
impacts. In response to these comments.
the Agency conducted additional
ground-water modeling using new pulse
assumptions developed from
commenter-submitted information. The
Agency developed what it believed to be
better pulse assumptions in an effort to
determine how long pentachlorophenate
will be present in on-going operations
which have switched over from its past
use. This new data was obtained from
performing mass balance iterations
using typical tank volumes found at
both large and small facilities. These
mathematical calculations showed that
cross-contamination from previous use
of chlorophenolics will be present in a
substitute products for only two to six
yean from the time a plant stops using
chlorophenolics. The Agency found that
the highest estimated risk to an
individual from drinking ground water
for nine yean at peak concentrations in
the two- or six-year pulse resulting from
cross contamination, ia significantly
diminished and the broad effect on
dioxin levels in fish is reduced by
several orders of magnitude. This new
analysis shows that the risks associated
with cross-contamination do not justify
a hazardous waste listing to capture
cross-contaminated wastes. In the
proposed rule. EPA addressed the fact
that PCP is no longer in use at most
facilities in its baseline risk estimates.
which have been revised in the final
rule to reflect source concentrations and
pulse durations mom representative of
the cross-contamination, incremental-
risk scenario. Chart 1 below compares
the incremental risks from crosa-
contamiiuned wastes as calculated for
the proposed rule to the values obtained
using the new approach.
-------
466
Federal Register / Vol. 59.-No. 2 / Tuesday. January 4, 1994 / Rules and Regulations
CHART 1.—INCREMENTAL RISKS' DUE TO CROSS CONTAMINATED WASTES
:'
Proposed to NPRM..
Rnuiuri
Constituent
pUfee). ••
noun mi ana sneunsn consumjjooo
(general population end recreational
fisher).
large tacttttts).
•mat IstiMies).
ninrki A»h ft itttMfeh rrVMunmfim
(recreational •sher).
(general pop.).
Oiown soil ingestion
, Signincanl threat
pathway
Ground water
Soil
Soil ^ „
Ground water „.„..
Soi
Sol
Soi
Central tendency
5x10 " '
18x10 * '" (general
population).
7x10-'' ...
6x10 * ..
2x10 ••
2x10 - '*
8x10-'*
7x10-'"
High end
2x10 **
4x10 - ', rec
fisher.
2x10 - * ....
2x10 - * .. ..
6x10 - *
3x10 • "
1x10 * *''
2x10 -«
Population risk
.005
0.2
.0004
.007
0.02
NR
.0002
4x10-i
Meti
frisk.
As shown in Chart 1. population risk
is lower than that presented in the
propose! for both fish/shellfish
consumption and the soil ingestion
pathway, due to a unit conversion error
in expressing dioxin concentration. The
dioxin concentrations in the
formulation at one of the affected
facilities (Aquasco. MD) were reported
usine incorrect units, causing, a 1,000-
fold error to be incorporated into the
risk estimates for the fish and shellfish
ingestion and soil ingestion scenarios.
When this error was corrected, the
TCDD-TEQ levels used as the source
concentration for affected facilities
(cross-contamination from past use of
chlorophenolic formulations) and used
in the lifetime individual risk estimates
for the soil/fish and shellfish ingestion
scenarios also wen reduced 1,000-fold.
The incremental population risk was
revised for the ground-water scenario
from an original 0.005 value to between
0.007 and 0.02 cancer cases. This range
of 0.007 to 0.02 cancer cases was
obtained because two different
modelling scenarios were run to
generate the extremes of this range. One
model run used input parameters which
would simulate decay for a small
production plant. The input information
was obtained from a mass balance
iteration which showed that it would
take a small plant approximately 6 years
to decrease cross-contamination levels
to near zero; likewise, the second model
used input parameters for large facilities
which predicted a two year decline to
near zero levels of cross-contamination.
The details of the mass balance -
approach and the resulting change in
population risk can be found in the
background document for this final rule.
The Agency believes that these revised
risk levels do not warrant a hazardous
waste listing.
Based on the above two main factors
(i>. (1) chlorophenolic production
chlorophenolic use decline and (2)
revised risk due to cross contamination),
the Agency looked closely at any
potential environmental benefits that
may accrue front a hazardous waste
listing. Given the market trend, the
Agency cannot identify any tangible
benefits to be gained from listing wastes
generated from the use of
chlorophenolic formulations for wood
surface protection. Environmental
damages caused by previous use of
chlorophenolics have already occurred.
A listing of these wastes cannot mitigate
past damages nor can it force the clean-
up of these damages. Such potential
jurisdiction exists under current
programs. Authority under CERCLA end
RCRA 3007 exists even if a decision is
nude not to list as is the case for this
final rule.
Damage to the environment of this
magnitude from previous use of
chlorophenolic formulations within this
industry an not expected to occur in the
future unless use of full-strength
chlorophenolics resumes. Furthermore, '
sampling data collected at surface
protection sites indicate that dioxin
concentrations in storage yards (the
largest area of a plant) are below l ppb.
The heavier contamination that occurs
in the process area is confined to a small
area and likely will not migrate off-site
to environmental receptors. Therefore.
the Agency finds that the risks posed by
this residual contamination are limited
and .that a hazardous waste listing
would likely simply result in these
limited anas of contamination being left
in place and not produce an
environmental benefit. Thus the effect
on past contamination does not justify
a hazardous waste listing.
B. Operating Requirements for Surface
Protection Plants
Because the Agency is not listing
F033 wastes, the operating standards for
surface protection plants proposed in
the April 27,1993 notice are not
applicable and, thus, are not being
finalized. Furthermore, surface
protection plants are not required to
follow any specific waste management
requirements regarding previous use of
chlorophenolics as a result of this rule.
C. Addition of Chemicals to Appendix
VUIof40CFRPart261
Although this final rule does not list
any wastes from wood surface
protection processes as hazardous, the
Agency believes that certain
constituents contained in these wastes
warrant inclusion in appendix Vul of
part 261.40 CFR 261.11 provides that
"Ishibstances will be listed on appendix
VDI only if they have been shown in
scientific studies to have toxic,
carcinogenic, mutagenic or teratogenic
effects on humans or other life forms."
In the April 27 notice, EPA proposed to
add six hazardous constituents of
concern found in surface protection
wastes to appendix VTH of 40 CFR part
261. Based on the information gathered
during this listing investigation, the
following four are being added to the
list: sodium pentachlorophenate.
potassium pentachlorophenate. the
sodium salt of 2,3.4,6-tetrschlorophenol,
and the potassium salt of 2,3,4,6-
tetrachlorophenol. The Agency
presented information in the proposed
rule and supporting background
documents on the adverse effects of
these compounds. For those reasons.
EPA is finalizing the addition of four of
these constituents to appendix Vill of
part 261. The Agency is not at this time
finalizing the addition of OCDD and
I
-------
Federal Regjatar / Vol. 59. No. 2 / Tuesday. January 4. 1994 / Rules and Regulations
487
I
OCDF to Appendix VOL As mentioned
before, the Agency to investigating *
further the information submitted by the
commenters regarding the effects of
OCDP and OCDF reported in the
Couture, Elwell, end Birnbaum study.t
used to support the derisions made in
the "Interim Procedures for Estimating
Risks Associated with Exposures of
Mixtures of Chlorinated Dibenzo-p-
dioxins and Dibenzofurans and the 1969
Update".
VL Amendment of SW-846 (Test
Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,
PhysiaUCbenical Method*)
In the notice of proposed rulemaking,
the Agency proposed to add Method
4010 flmnninoastay Test for the
Presence of Pentacnlarophenete) to the
Second and Third Editions of SW-846.
The purpose behind this proposal was
to aid owners/operators of wood surface
protection plants with the proposed
formulation testing requirement.
With respect to requiring the use of
SW-846 methods for testing for the
presence of pentachlorophenate in
wood surface protection "in-process"
formulation, the issue is moot since EPA
is not listing any wood surface
protection waste* as hazardous.
Nonetheless. EPA believes that although
no comments wen received on Method
4010. Method 4010 is an appropriate
method, in general, far testing for die
presence of pentachlorophenate or
peiitachlorophenol end can. therefore,
be used in other applications other than
for wood surface protection formulation
testing. The Agency is. therefore, adding
Method 4010 to the Third Edition of
SW-846 as Update HA. We are not
adding Method 4010 to the Second
Edition of SW-846 since the Third
Edition has replaced the Second Edition
on August 31,1993 for use in
mandatory applications (SB FR 46040).
Method 4010, including it* protocol and
documentation supporting this action
can be found hi the docket for this
rulemaking. See the "For Further
Information" Section in front of this
preamble for the EPA contact person for
further information or with questions on
Method 4010.
VTL Pollution Prevention end Waste
Minimization
The Agency is preparing a separate
guidance manual recommending
voluntary pollution prevention and
waste minimization techniques for the
lumber industry. Since it has studied
the surface protection industry in
making a listing determination for
wastes generated from the use of
chlorophenolic formulations. EPA has
gained a broad perspective on the best
ways to reduce wastes generated by this
wood surface protection industry. The
ideas gained from the study are ,
presented in this manual. Some
recommended strategies for pollution
prevention in the surface protection
industry are described in this section.
Further information can be found in the
manual.
The ultimate goal of pollution
prevention is to reduce present and
future threats to human health and the
environment Pollution prevention (also
referred to as source reduction) is the
use of materials, processes, or practices
that reduce or eliminate the quantity
and/or loxkary of wastes at the source
of generation. Pollution prevention is
the first step in a hierarchy of options
for reducing the generation of waste.
The first recommended pollution
prevention option is to replace chemical
treatment with another type of treatment
to achieve surface protection. One
alternate is to dry the wood to reduce
water content (high water content leads
to sapstain). The Agency to aware that
this option may not be economically
viable for a smaller mill If such a
system cannot be feasibly employed, it
would be preferable for a user of
chlorophenolic-containing formulations
to switch to an alternate formulation.
Other pollution prevention strategies
for use within the surface protection
industry include: (1) Providing local
and general ventilation within the
cutting process ana to reduce dust that
can accumulate on wood; (2) blowing
wood with air to reduce the amount of
sawdust on wood prior to surface
protection; and (3) using drainage
collection devices like gutters on
rooftops to keep precipitation away
ss wastes. The pollution
fiuin process wastes.
prevention practi
•ibed here can
be critical to reduce the amount of i
generated. Although the Agency is not
listing these chlorophenolic wood
surface protection wastes, the pollution
prevention practices described in the
guidance manual an applicable to any
waste generating process. For wastes
that cannot be reduced at the source.
generators may consider recycling as the
next best option.
VIII. Analysis of Potential Costs and
Benefits
A. Executive Order Requirements
Executive Order 12866
Under Executive Order 12866. (58 FR
51735 (October 4,1993)) the Agency
must determine whether the regulatory
action is "significant" and therefore
subject to OMB review and the
requirements of the Executive Order.
The order defines "significant
regulatory action" as one that is likely
to result in a rule that may.
(1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more
adversely affect in a material way the
economy, a sector of the economy.
productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or
state, local, or tribal governments or
communities;
(2) Create a serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken
or planned by another agency;
(3) Materiajly alter the budgetary
impact of entitlements, grants, user fees,
or loan programs or the rights and
obligations of recipients thereof; or
(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues
arising out of legal mandates, the
President's priorities, or the principles
set forth in the Executive Order.
It has been determined that this rule
is not a "significant regulatory action"
under the terms of Executive Order
12866 and is therefore not subject to
OMB review. Nevertheless, the Agency
prepared an abbreviated RIA or
"Economic Assessment" (EA) in order
to examine costs and benefits likely to
occur as a result of that action.
B. Description of Costa and Benefits of
This Rule
Because the Agency has decided not
to list wastes generated from the use of
chlorophenolic formulations in surface
protection operations, no specific action
is required under this Rule. Facilities,
however, may choose to take some
remedial action as a result of publicity
surrounding this action. A detailed
analysis of work pet formed is described
in the background document for this
final rule.
DC. State Authority
Under section 3006 of RCRA. EPA
may authorize qualified States to
administer and enforce the RCRA
program within the State. (See 40 CFR
part 271 for the standards and
requirements for authorization.)
Following authorization. EPA retains
enforcement authority under sections
3007,3008.3013. and 7003 of RCRA,
although authorized States have primary
enforcement responsibility.
Before the Hazardous and Solid Waste
Amendments of 1984 (HSWA) amended
RCRA. a State with final authorization
administered its hazardous waste
program entirely hi lieu of the Federal
program in that State. The Federal
requirements no longer applied in the
authorized State, and EPA could not
issue permits for any plants located in
the State with permitting authorization.
When new, more stringent Federal
requirements were promulgated or
-------
-468
••Federal Register / Vol. 59, No. 2 / Tuesday, January 4, 1994 / Rules and Regulations
enacted, the State was obligated to enact
equivalent authority within specified
time frames. New Federal requirements
did not take effect in an authorized Slate
until the State adopted the requirements
as State law.
By contrast, under section 3006(g) of
RCRA, 42 U.S.C 6926(g). new
requirements and prohibitions imposed
by the HSWA take effect in authorized
States at the same time that they take
effect in non-authorized States. EPA is
directed to implement those
requirements and prohibitions in
authorized States, including the
issuance of permits, until the State is
granted authorization to do so. While
States must still adopt HSWA-ralated
provisions«s State law to retain final
authorization, the Federal HSWA
requirements apply in authorized Stales
in the interim.
Although this final rule does not list,
as hazardous, chioropbenolic wastes
from the wood surface protection
industry, it does add four constituents
to appendix VIO of 40 CFR part 261.
These additions will not be effective in
authorized States since the requirements
are not being imposed pursuant to
HSWA. These requirements will be
effective only in those States that do not
have final authorization. In authorized
States, these requirements will not be
applicable until the States revise their
programs to adopt equivalent
requirements under State law.
Section 271.21(e)(2) of EPA's state
authorization regulations (40 CFR part
271} requires that States with final
authorization must modify their
programs to reflect Federal program
changes and submit the modifications to
EPA for approval. The deadline by
which the States must modify their
programs to adopt this proposed
regulation, if it is adopted as a final rule.
will be determined by the date of
promulgation of a final rule in
accordance with 5 271.21(eM2). If the
proposal is adopted as a final rule, Table
1 at 40 CFR 271.1 will be amended
accordingly. Once EPA approves the
modification, the State requirements
become RCRA Subtitle C requirements.
States with authorized RCRA
programs already may have regulations
similar to what is being finalized in this
been assessed against the Federal
regulations being proposed today to
determine whether they meet the tests
for authorization. Thus, a State would
not be authorized to implement these
regulations as RCRA requirements until
State program modifications are
submitted to EPA and approved.
pursuant to 40 CFR 271.21. Of course,
Slates with existing regulations that are
not less stringent than current Federal
regulations may continue to administer
. and enforce their regulations as a matter
of State law.
h should be noted that authorized
Slates are required to modify their
programs only when EPA promulgates
Federal standards thai are more
stringent or broader in scope than
existing Federal standards. Section 3009
of RCRA allows States to impose
standards more stringent than those in
the Federal program. For those Federal
program changes that are less stringent
or reduce the scope of the Federal
program. States are not required to
modify their programs. (See 40 CFR
271.1(1).) This proposed rule, if
finalized, is neither less stringent than
nor a reduction in the scope of the
current Federal program and, therefore,
slates would be required to modify their
programs to retain authorization to
implement and enforce these
' regulations.
X. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
This final rule amends the hazardous
regulations by adding four _
icals to appendix VID of 40 CFR
rule. These State regulations have not
waste r
chem
part 261 and amending SW-846 by
adding Method 4010. These are impacts
with negligible effects to small entities.
Therefore, there is no need to consider
its impacts on small entities by
preparing • Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis.
XL Paperwork Redaction Ad
This rule does not contain any
information collection requirements
subfect to OMB review under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980. 44
U.S.C.3S01etsea.
40 CFB Pat 260
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure.
Confidential business information.
Hazardous waste.
4O CFR Part 261
Hazardous materials, Waste treatment
and disposal, Recycling.
Dated: December 23,1993.
Carol M. Browner,
Administrator.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, chapter I of title 40 of the
Code of Federal Regulations is amended
as follows:
PART 260—HAZARDOUS WASTE
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM: GENERAL
1. The authority citation for part 260
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C 6905.6912(a). 6921-
6927.6930,6934,693$, 6937,6936,6939.
and 6974.
2. Section 260.11 is amended by
revising the "Test Methods lor
Evaluating Solid Waste/Physical/
Chemical Methods" reference in
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
$ 2BO*l • H9taiVf1C*W» ,
fa) * * *
•Test Methods for Evaluating Solid
Waste. Physical/Chemical Methods,"
EPA Publication SW-846 (Third Edition
(November. 1986). as amended by
Updates I. D and HA). The Third Edition
of SW-846 and Updates I. 0, and HA
(document number 95S-001-OOOOO-1)
an available from the Superintendent of
Documents. U.S. Government Printing
Office. Washington. DC 20402. (202)
783-3238.
PART 281—IDENTIFICATION AND
LISTING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
3. The authority citation for part 261
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C 6905,6912U). 6921.
6922. and 6938.
4. Appendix VHI of part 261 is
amended by adding the following
hazardous constituents in alphabetical
order by common name to read as
follows:
AppefHflx VIM to Part 281—Hazardous
Constituents
I
Common name
Chemical abstracts name
Chemical
NO.
waste No.
potassium porftKnlofopnsnefte,
PentacMorophenol. potassium salt
77/8/36 _ None
-------
Federal
/ VoL 59, No. 2 I Tuesday. January 4. 1994 / Rules and Regulations 469
Common name
Chemical abettactt ram*
Chemical
bstrac
No.
Hazardous
I No.
Sodwmi
2.3,4.6-trttichtorophenol. potassium saK .—
2J.4.frtetrach(ofophenol. sodium salt „...—
Pentachtorophenol, sotfcjrni
*
same ~,*~ .,
131522—. None
53535276. None
2SS67SS9. None
IFR Doc. 93-32032 Filed 12-30-93:8:45 ami
atLUHO CODE IM040*
i
-------
s
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
Revision Checklist 129 Summary*
t
Rule Title:
Checklist Title:
Reference:
Promulgation Date:
Effective Date:
Cluster:
Provision Type:
Linkage:
Optional:
Hazardous Waste Management System; Identification and Listing
of Hazardous Waste; Treatability Studies Sample Exclusion
Revision of Conditional Exemption for Small Scale Treatability
Studies
59 FR 8362-8366
February 18, 199*4
February 18, 1994
RCRA Cluster IV
Non-HSWA
Revision Checklist 49
Yes
Summary: On July 19, 1988 (53 FR 27290; Revision Checklist 49) EPA promulgated the
Treatability Sample Exemption Rule which conditionally exempted from Subtitle C regulation
samples of hazardous waste collected for purposes of conducting small-scale treatability
studies. That rule was promulgated in recognition of the inhibiting effect of the stringent
RCRA Subtitle C requirements on the development of new treatment capacity and the minimal
public health and environmental risks involved in conducting small-scale treatability studies.
This February 18,1994 rule revises that existing rule, the principal change being to increase
the quantity and time limits for major classes of contaminated media (specifically soil and
debris) used in treatability studies without triggering RCRA Subtitle C requirements. The rule
increases the exempt amounts from 1000 kg to 10,000 kg of media contaminated with non-
acute hazardous waste and from 250 kg to 2500 kg of media contaminated with acute
hazardous waste, when used in treatability studies. To the initial period of two years for
completing testing, this new rule also allows the Administrator to grant requests on a case-by-
case basis for up to an additional two years for treatability studies involving bioredmediation.
The existing case-by-case variance provision at 40 CFR 261.4(e)(3) has also been increased
from 500 kg to 5,000 kg for media contaminated with non-acute hazardous waste and from
250 kg to 2,500 kg for media contaminated with acute hazardous waste. Provisions have
been added to allow these additional quantities to be requested prior to commencing
treatability studies. This revised rule is based in part on the recognition that larger quantities
of contaminated media are often needed for treatability testing by technology developers and
that larger-scale testing would also greatly increase confidence with which remedial action
decision-makers make remedy selection, thus improving CERCLA response activities and
RCRA corrective actions.
State Authorization: This rule is placed in RCRA Cluster IV; the changes addressed by it were
promulgated under non-HSWA authority. Thus, this regulation is immediately applicable only
in states that do not have final authorization for a base RCRA program. For states that are
authorized for a base program, these changes do not go into effect until the state becomes
authorized for them. Like the initial Treatability Exemption rule, these changes are considered
optional as they are less stringent or reduce the scope of the federal program. The Agency
encourages the states to adopt these changes and plans to work with states to encourage
timely adoption of this rule because of its benefits to the development of treatment capacity.
For states that choose to adopt these changes, the state modification deadline is July 1,1995
DSUM129.15 -12/21/94
(Prinwd: 12/21/94)
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
Revision Checklist 129 Summary (cont'd)
(or July 1, 1996 if a State Statutory change is necessary). The State Revision Application
must include applicable regulations, AG statement addendum, Revision Checklist 129, other
associated checklists and other application materials, i.e. a program description and an MOA,
as determined by the Regional office.
Attorney General's Statement Entry: The following entry should be placed at Subsection IDD
in the Model Revision Attorney General's Statement,
DD. [OPTIONAL; This is a reduced requirement.] State statutes and
regulations increase the quantity and time limits for contaminated media used
in treatability studies, as indicated in Revision Checklist 129.
Federal Authority: RCRA §3001; 40 CFR 261.4(e)(2)(i)&(ii), (e)(3), (f)(3),
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 129
Revision of Conditional Exemption for
Small Scale Treatability Studies
59 FB 8362-8366
February 18, 1994
(RCRA Cluster IV, Non-HSWA provisions)
1) This rule revises the July 19, 1988 (53 FR 27290) Treatability Studies Sample Exemption Rule
addressed by Revision Checklist 49. States which are not authorized for Revision Checklist 49
are encouraged to adopt these present revisions at the same time the requirements addressed by
Revision Checklist 49 are adopted.
2) As with the July 19, 1988 rule, States are not required to adopt these present revisions
because they are less stringent or reduce the scope of the existing Federal requirements.
However, EPA strongly encourages States to adopt these revisions. In addition, the Agency plans
to work with States to encourage timely adoption of this rule because of its benefits to the
development of treatment capacity.
t
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV.
ALENT
LESS
STRW.
GENT
MORE
STRIN.
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
PART 261 - IDENTIFICATION AND LISTING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
SUBPART A - GENERAL
t EXCLUSIONS
replace " 1 000 kg of any
non-acute hazardous
waste" with "10,000 kg of
media contaminated with
non-acute hazardous
waste, 1000 kg of non-
acute hazardous waste
other than' contaminated
media"; replace "or 250 kg
of soils, water, or debris"
with "2500 kg media"
261.4(e)(2){i)
t
-
February 18, 1994 - Page 1 of 7
DO. 129. 15
R*vM: 03/14/94
Pnm«d: 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 129: Revision of Conditional Exemption for
Small Scale Treatabilitv Studies (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
replace "1000 kg of non-
acute hazardous waste, 1
kg of acute hazardous
waste, or 250 kg of soils,
water, or debris
contaminated with acute
hazardous waste" with
"10,000 kg; the 10,000 kg
quantity may be all media
contaminated with non-
acute hazardous waste, or
may include 2500 kg of
media contaminated with
acute hazardous waste,
1000 kg of hazardous
waste, and 1 kg of acute
hazardous waste"
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
'
_
261.4(e)(2)(H)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS: ^^^
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRW.
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
^W
BROADER
m SCOPE
4*
M
February 18. 1994 - Page 2 of 7
OCL 129. 15 - RtviM* 03/14/94
PniMd 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 129: Revision of Conditional Exemption for
Small Scale Treatability Studies (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
completely revise
paragraph; add a new first
sentence regarding requests
for treatability studies
involving bioremediation;
delete the phrase ", or
State Director (if located in
an authorized State)," after
"The Regional
Administrator"; delete
commas around the phrase
"on a case-by-case basis";
change "paragraph (e)(2)(i)"
to "paragraphs (e}(2)(i)&(ii)
and (f)(4)'; replace "500 kg
of non-acute hazardous
waste," with "5000 kg of
media contaminated with
non-acute hazardous
waste, 500 kg of non-acute
hazardous waste, 2500 kg
of media contaminated with
acute hazardous waste
and"; delete the phrase ",
and 250 kg of soils,
water,. .to conduct further
treatability study evaluation
when"; restructure the
remaining portions of
paragraph 261 .4(e)(3)
starting with "There has
been an equipment
failure..." and "The
additional quantities
allowed...", and redesignate
them as new
subparagraphs (e)(3)(ii) and
(e){3)(iii)
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
^
261.4(e}(3)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG is:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
-
BROADER
IN SCOPE
t
February 18, 1994 - Page 3 of 7
DO. 129. 1S-R»viM*
03/14/94
12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 129: Revision of Conditional Exemption for
Small Scale Treatability Studies (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
1 redesignate old
261.4(e) (3) (Das
261.4(e)(3)(iii)(A); add new
. subparagraph regarding
factors to be considered
when reviewing requests
for authorization to ship,
store and conduct
treatability studies
redesignate old
261 .4(eK3Mii) as
261.4(e)(3)(iii)(B); the third
to the last sentence ("There
has been an equipment...
specifications for
treatment.") from the old
261 .4(e)(3)(intro) becomes
the new 261.4(e)(3)(ii); to
the beginning of that
sentence add the phrase "In
response to requests for
authorization to ship, store
and conduct treatability
studies on additional
quantities after initiation or
completion of initial
treatability studies, when:"
, ^
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
261.4(e)(3)(i)
261.4(e)(3Kii)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
:*
BROADER
IN SCOPE
1
^I^Br"
February 18, 1994 - Page 4 of 7
DCL 129. IS - ItevMd 03/14/94
Printed: 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9641.00-21
SPA 15
RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 129: Revision of Conditional Exemption for
SmaH Scale Treatability Studies (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
redesignate old
261.4(e)(3)(iii) as
261 .4(eH3){iii)(C); the last
two sentences (beginning
with "The additional
quantities") from the old
261 .4(e){3){intro) become
the new 264.4(e)(3)(iii);
revise the first of these two
sentences by inserting the
phrase "and timeframes"
between "quantities" and
"allowed" and replacing
"are subject to all the
provisions in paragraphs
(eKDand (e)(2Hii)(vi> of
this section" with "in
paragraph (e)(3){i) and (ii)
of this section are subject
to all the provisions in
paragraphs (e)(1) and
(e)(2Miii) through (vi) of this
section."
old 261 .4(e)(3)(i) becomes
261 .4(e)(3)(iii)(A); insert
"time or" between both
occurrences of "additional"
and "quantity"; replace the
semicolon at the end of the
subparagraph with a
comma
old 261.4(e)(3)(ii) becomes
261 .4{e)(3)(iii)(B); change
"data" to "date" after
"studies including the"
old 261 .4(e)(3Hiii) becomes
261 .4(e)(3)(iii)(C)
.-
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
261.4{e)(3)(iii)
261.4(eH3)(iii>(A)
261.4(e){3)(iii)(B)
261.4(e)(3)(iii)(C)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
-
«
I
February 18, 1994 - Page 5 of 7
DCL 129. 15 • RcviMd: 03/14/94
Plinl«d: 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 129: Revision of Conditional Exemption for
SmaH Scale Treatability Studies (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
old 26l.4(e){3)(iv) becomes
261.4(e)(3)(iii)(D)
old 261.4(eM3)(v) becomes
261.4
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 129: Revision of Conditional Exemption for
Small Scale Treatability Studies (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
insert "(two years for
treatability studies involving
bioremediation)" after "no
more than one year";
replace "has elapsed" with
"have elapsed"; add two
new sentences at the end
of the paragraph regarding
treated material from
treatability studies that can
be archived
FEDERAL RCAA CITATION
261.4(f)(5)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
I
1 Note that there is a typographical error in this subparagraph; "treatabilty" should be
"treatability."
2 The replacement of the semi-colon with a comma at the end of 261.4(e)(iii)(A) may be a
typographical error as other 261.4(e)(iii) subparagraphs (i.e., 261.4(e)(iii)(BJ-(D)) end with a
semi-colon.
February 18,1994 - Page 7 of 7
DCL 129. IS -R*VMd: 03/14/94
Pmtttd: 12/21/94
-------
s
-------
I
Friday
February 18, 1994
Part VII
Environmental
Protection Agency
40 CFR Part 261
Identification and Listing of Hazardous
Waste, Treatabllily Studies Sample
Exclusion; Rule
-------
: 8382 Federal Register / Vol. 59. No. 34 / Friday, February 18. 1994 / Rules and Regulations
ENVIRONMEKTAL PROTECTION
AQENCY
40 CFR Part 261
Syi
: UkMitlfication and Ltettng of
Hazardoue Waste; Treatsbtltty StucDas
Sample Exclusion
AQENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: On July 7,1993, the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
id revisions to the Treatability
Sample Exemption Rule. The
illy exempts small scale
treetability studies from Subtitle C
regulation.
EPA is today issuing a Bnel rule. The
principal change to the existing rule is
to increase the quantity of contaminated
media which an conditionally exempt
from Subtitle C regulation when used in
conducting treatahiUty studies.
EFFECTIVE DATE: This rule becomes
effective on February 18,1994.
ADDRESSES: The public docket for this
rulemaking is located in the RCRA
docket, located in room M2427 at the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
401M SL SW.. Washington. DC 20460.
The telephone number for the docket is
(202) 260-0327. The record is available
for inspection by appointment only,
between the hours of 9 ajn. and 4 pjn.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. Viewers may copy up to 100
pages free of charge, after which copies
cost $0.15 per page.
rOH FURTHER ^FORMATION CONTACT:
Questions relating to the technical
content of this rule should be directed
to Jim CnrffrnfnEf or John Klngscott,
Technology Innovation Office (5102W).
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
at (703) 306-8796 or (703) 306-8749.
Other inquiries should be directed to
the RCRA/Superfund Hotline at (800)
424-9346 Of (703) 920-9810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Oottia*
i Background
ILDtKUMion
A. Summary of ExMlagTnatablllry
Sample Exchuion Rule
B. Need and Rationale tat This Rubmaking
C Response to Msfor Comment*
1. Quantity Unto
2- Scope of the Bxenipuon
3. Time Limit* for Sample Retention
4. Variance* far Procwting Additional
Quantities and Extended Tine Limits
•i. Treatabiltty Studies at Federal Fadlittei
B. Promulgation/State Adoption
in. State Authority
IV. Effective Data .
V. Regulatory Analyses
A. Executive Order 12866
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
C Paperwork Reduction Act
1. Background
On July 19,1988 (52 FR 27290). EPA
issued a rule that conditionally
exempted from Subtitle C hazardous
waste regulation waste samples
collected for purposes of conducting
small-scale treatability studies. 40 CFR
261.4 (eHfl- This rule was promulgated
in recognition of the inhibiting effect of
the stringent Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act (RCRA) Subtitle C
requirements on the development of
new treatment capacity, ana the
minimal public health and
environmental risks involved in
conducting small-scale treatability
studies. The rule identified specific
quantities of various types of wastes
which could be transported, stored and
used hi treatability studies without the
need for RCRA Subtitle C regulation.
On July 7,1993 (SB FR 36367), EPA
proposed •"mirim/Hits to the existing .
rule which would increase the quantity
limits for major classes of contaminated
media (specifically soil and debris)
which could be employed in treatability
studies without triggering RCRA
Subtitle C requirements. The proposal
was based in part on the recognition
that larger quantities of soil and debris
were often needed for treatability testing
by technology developers. Larger-scale
testing also greatly increases the
with which remedial actioi
dedsion-maken make remedy selection
decisions. **vit improving CERCLA
response activities and RCRA corrective
actions, see 88 FR 36367,36370.
EPA also requested comment on the
desirability of an amendment to
increase the quantity limits for other
. forms of remediation waste in addition
to soil and debris. The proposal also
included an amendment which would
allow longer time frames for conducting
treatability studies Involving
bionmediation. and solicited comment
on appropriate time limits for other
technologies. EPA did not request
conMpttflt on i of VBODQD •00' coou&tt&t
period on. the propriety of the existing
exemption.
Twenty-seven comments wen
. received tat response to the proposed
rule. The comments wen universally
favorable regarding the need for and
desirability of increasing the treatability
study quantity limits. A substantial
majority of the comments favored
extending the scope beyond soil and
debris to other forms of remediation
and/or hazardous waste. General
reasons offered by commenters minor
those'stated in the proposed rule, e.g.,
assisting technology development and
increasing confidence in remedy
selection.
EPA is today issuing a final rule
which increases the quantity and time
limits for contaminated media to be
used in treatability studies. The rule
would increase the exempt amounts
from 1000 kg up to 10,000 kg of media
contaminated with non-acute hazardous
waste and from 2SO kg to 2500 kg of
media contaminated with acute
hazardous, when used in treatability
studies.
The existing case-by-case variance
provision (40 CFR 26l.4(e)(3)) is
increased from 500 kg to 5000 kg for
media contaminated with non-acute
hazardous waste and from 250 kg to
2500 kg for media contaminated with
acute hazardous waste. The existing
variance provision focuses on allowing
limited additional quantities after the
initial increment of material .is
processed. EPA is adding criteria to the
variance provision to allow the
additional quantity to be requested in
advance.
EPA is also increasing the time limits
for treatability studies involving
bioremediation. Treatability studies
involving bioremediation have an initial
period of two yean to complete testing,
and under the case-by-case variance
provisions discussed below, may
request up to an additional two years.
The remainder of the preamble
discusses the major comments received
on the proposed rule and EPA's
response to them. All other comments
are discussed hi a beckizround
document that is available in the RCRA
docket
IL Discussion
A. Summary of the Existing Tnatability
Sample Exclusion Au/e
The existing Treatability Sample
Exclusion rule imposes limits on the
quantity of material which may be
snipped, stored or treated under the
exemption. In order to qualify for the
conditional exclusion. laboratory and
test facilities must comply with the
following quantity and time limitations
as well as notification, reporting and
record-keeping requirements:
Shipment—The mass of each sample
shipment may not exceed 1000 kg of "as
received" hazardous waste. 1 kg of acute
hazardous waste, or 250 kg soils, water,
or debris contaminated with acute
hazardous waste. 40 CFR 261.4(e)(2)(U).
"As received" refers to the waste
f
-------
Federal Register / VoL 59. No. 34 / Friday. February 18^ 1994 / Rules and Regulations 8363
i
shipped by the generator or sample
collector as it arrives at the laboratory or'
testing facility. 40 CFR'261.4(f)(3).
Storage—the laboratory or testing
facility may store up to 1000 kg of non-
acute hazardous waste. This limitation
can include 500 kg of soils, water, or
debris contaminated with acute
hazardous waste or 1kg of acute
hazardous waste. 40 CFR 26l.4(f)(4).
Treatment—The laboratory or testing
facility, on a per waste stream per
treatment process basis, may conduct
treatability tests on up to 1000 kg of
non-acute hazardous waste. 250 kg of
soils, water, or debris contaminated
with acute hazardous waste, or 1 kg of
acute hazardous waste. 40 CFR
261.4(e)(2)(i). The rule imposes a
treatment initiation rate limit of 250 kg
per day of "as received" waste for the
entire laboratory or testing facility.
Time Limits—The existing exclusion
requires that the laboratory or testing
facility return the sample to the
generator or sample collector, or send it
to a designated facility within 90 days
of completion of the treatability study.
or no more than one year from the time
the generator or sample collector
shipped the sample to the laboratory or
testing facility, whichever date first
occurs. 40 CFR 261.4(0(5).
EPA did not seek comment on the
propriety of these exemption levels or
criteria, but merely sought comment on
amendments that would expand the
scope of the existing rule.
B. Need and Rationale for Amendments
to the Existing Rub
The preamble to the proposed rule
contained an extensive discussion of the
reasons the Agency felt that
amendments to the existing rule were
desirable. 58 FR 36367 {July 7.1993).
Interested readers are referred to that
document for further information.
C. Response to Major Comments
1. Quantity Limits
All commenters supported an
amendment to increase the quantity
limits in the exemption for soil and
debris samples by at least the quantities
proposed. Almost 50% of the comments
suggested adopting higher exemption
limits on either an across-the-board or a
case-by-case basis.
Commenters noted the significant
challenges posed in designing and
verifying the operational performance of
treatment processes. Commenters also
noted the challenges encountered in
designing and testing ancillary system
components—e.g.. material handling
equipment (getting the waste material
into the treatment unit in an appropriate
physical state and condition), and
emission control equipment. Smaller-
scale tests conducted at the laboratory
or bench scale often do not involve
ancillary system components, or may
not utilize sufficient throughput to
adequately test these components.
Suggestions to further increase the
quantity limits ranged as high as 25,000
kg. Other comments suggested that
quantity limits higher than those
proposed be set on a case-by-case basis.
These comments identified site size, the
nature of the waste and/or the
remediation technology, the
concentration of hazardous constituents
in the waste matrix, and the intent of
the study as possible factors to be
considered in these case-by-case
determinations.
EPA is aware that the larger the scale
of the technology development or
remedy selection treatability study, the
more likely the results will represent the
performance of full-scale remedial
equipment. Furthermore. EPA's
proposal identified the need to address
materials handling problems as a major
basis for the proposed revision.
The data adduced by EPA in the
proposed rule support the conclusion
that many of the technologies can be
tested within the limits proposed.
Nevertheless, EPA's own data also
confirm that there are situations where
additional quantities may be necessary
in order to conduct treatability studies
at an appropriate scale.
The existing rule has a provision for
case-by-case approval of additional
quantities. 40 CFR 261.4(e)(3). As
discussed further below. EPA is
modifying the variance provision to
allow advance approval, on a case-by-
case basis, of conducting studies on
additional quantities of contaminated
media. Due to the potential for delay in
processing case-by-case applications,
laboratory and testing facilities should
carefully consider the tradeoffs in
seeking advance approval of additional
quantities.
2. Scope of the Exemption
All comments supported the basic
proposal to increase the quantity limits
for soil and debris, hi response to EPA's
solicitation of comment on increasing
the scope of the revision beyond soil
and debris, a substantial majority of the
comments recommended extending the
quantity increases to various other
forms of hazardous waste. Comments
differed on the exact scope beyond soil
and debris—e.g., all hazardous waste,
'remediation waste', wastewater and/or
groundwater.
Reasons suggested for increasing the
scope beyond soil and debris included
the difficulty of determining the
boundary between sludge and media in,
for example, unlined lagoons; the low
concentration of contaminants in
groundwater; the need for longer-
duration continuous flow tests; and the
need to develop integrated, optimized
remediation approaches in the case of
'remediation waste* in general. A
number of commenters also suggested
extending the increases to all forms of
hazardous waste, which would include
newly-generated industrial hazardous
wastes.
In response to these comments, and in
light of EPA's own experience regarding
the variety of contaminated media
encountered in cleanup efforts, EPA is
at this time modifying the scope of the
exemption to reach contaminated
media, including groundwater, surface
water, soils, sediment and debris that
contain listed hazardous waste or that
themselves exhibit a characteristic.
However, the proposal did not focus on
samples of newly-generated waste or
waste sludges, and the Agency is not
taking final action of those materials at
this time. EPA is considering additional
rulemaking to address larger scale
treatability studies on other forms of
hazardous waste.1
3. Time Limits for Sample Retention
As discussed above, EPA proposed to
allow up to two yean for treaubility
studies involving bioremediation. EPA
solicited comment on whether these
time frames were sufficient, and
whether testing involving other
technologies also required longer time
frames. No negative comments were
received on this proposal. Comments
included suggestions that the allowable
time period be even longer and/or that
additional technologies (e.g.,
phytoremediation and solidification/
stabilization) be eligible for longer .
duration studies.
With regard to the time limits. EPA
believes that two years should be
adequate for most treatability testing
involving bioremediation.*
Nevertheless, as discussed below. EPA
is modifying the case-by-case variance
provisions to allow up to an additional
< A* noted by several commentcn. tludgai will
bevo often become cjjumiingiod wito underlying
media, and pnont difficulty for thai* attempting
to collect madia ample* fat shipment. EPA agrees
that it may be difficult to distinguish sludges from
underlying media. Wheie unconiainerUed sludge*
have corfte into contact with underlying media. EPA
dot* not expect sample collectors to undertake
extraordinary aflbruto aiaun that samples coniUl
ooly of contaminated media.
» A* • point of clarification. Cor purposes of thi*
rule. EPA omtidan .pbytonraediation to be a form
ofMoraraedlatkm.
-------
8384 Federal Register / Vol. 59. No. 34 / Friday, February 18. 1994 / Rules and Regulations
two yean for completion of such
studies.
EPA expect* that this provision wiH
be used judiciously. Laboratory end
testing facilities cannot exceed the
limits in the rule on the amount of
material which may be stored and
treated. (e.g. 10.000 kg of media
contaminated with non-acute hazardous
waste plus 5000 kg if a full variance
quantity request is granted). On-going
studies reduce the quantity of materials
which may be stored for use in new
studies.
With regard to stabilization/
solidification. EPA's experience in the
Superfund Innovative Technology
Evaluation (SJ.T.E.) program indicates
that a one-year time frame is generally
adequate. Modifications discussed
below which allow retaining small
samples of treated materials should
address some of the concerns
underlying suggestions for allowing
longer duration studies for tills
technology (e.g.. to ensure the long-term
efficacy of the stabilization}.
Several comments addressed the
desirability of retaining samples of
treated materiel for future analysis. EPA
understands mat such a provision may
be useful for technologies such as
solidification/stabilization where the
attributes of treated material such as
compressive strength and teachability of
contaminants may change over tune, or
solvent extraction where there may be
idegradability
variance provisions allow additional
quantities of materials to be used in
instability .studies on a case-by-case
basis if specified conditions an met—
e.g.. mechanical failure during the
initial-treatability study or need to
verify the results of a previously
conducted study. As with the comments
relating to quantity limits in general.
commentere suggested across-the-board
and case-by-case approaches to
variances.
EPA finds the suggestion to allow
increased quantities of contaminated
media to a set maximum on a case-by-
case basis to be reasonable. EPA is
modifying the variance quantity by the
same factor by which it is increasing the
basic quantity limit
Thus, laboratory and testing facilities
may request up to an additional 5000 kg
of media contaminated with non-ecute
hazardous waste, or 2500 kg of media
contaminated with acute hazardous
tobe
issues of the long-!
i bic
of residual solvent in treated soil.
In response to these comments. EPA
is promulgating a provision allowing up
to 500 kg of treated material from a
particular wastestnem from testability
studies to be stored by the laboratory or
testing facility for up to 5 years. Material
archived for future analysis must be
included hi the •tonga quantity limit
for the fatility-e*.. a facility which
archives two 500 kg samples from
separate waste streams may only store
up to 9,000 kg (plus 5000 kg if*
variance is granted) of additional
material, and must be identified as such
in facility records and reports.
4. Variances for Requesting Additional
Quantities and Extended Time Limits
Several commenters suggested that
the variance provisions in the existing
rule (40 CFR 261.4(e)(3)) be increased by
the same factor applied to the base
quantity allowed. For example, under
the existing rule laboratories or testing
facilities could request approval for
further testing on up to an additional
500 kg from a particular wastestnem.
waste. The Agency considers this to
a conforming change to the general
concept of allowing larger quantity
studies, and views it as a logical
, is discussed above, in
response to *%********• that quantities
beyond those proposed be allowed on a
case-by-case basis. EPA is also adding a
provision that will allow laboratory and
testing facilities to apply for advance
authorization for variances. Factors to
be considered in reviewing advance
requests for additional quantities
include the nature of the technology, the
typed process (e^.. batch versus .
continuous), size of the unit undergoing
testing (particularly in relation to scale-
up considerations), time/quantity of
material required to reach steady-state
operating conditions, and test design
considerations such as mass balance
Finally, the case-by-case variance
provision has been modified to allow
laboratory and testing facilities
tnatability
studies to request a variance of up to
two additional years to complete their
studies.
5. Treatability Studies at Federal
Facilities
Several comments requested
clarification of the status of federal
facilities for purposes of eligibility for
the treatability study sample
Comments inc
iuded raising the variance
limit for contaminated media by the
same amount as the basic proposal. The
Federal facilities an often large in size.
with numerous different contamination
problems for which solutions must be
developed and applied. EPA notes that
the rule identifies "laboratory or, test
facilities" as the entities which may take
advantage of the conditional exclusion.
The Agency would not consider a huge
federal installation with numerous
laboratories or testing sites to be e single
"laboratory or test facility" for purposes
of this rule. Distinguishing attributes
include the requirement to obtain an
EPA Identification number for each
laboratory or test facility. 40 CFR
261.4(f)(2).
6. Promulgation/State Adoption
Comments on State Authorities are
addressed below in the "State
Authority" section.
m. State Authority
A number of comments indicated that
the efficacy of this rule depends to a
considerable extent on the availability
of the exclusion at the State level Since
the original treatability sample
exclusion rule was promulgated under
RCRA and not the Hazardous and Solid
Waste Act Amendments of 1984
(HSWA). this revision is also
promulgated pursuant to RCRA. As with
the existing rule, the revisions
promulgated today an not immediately
effective hi authorized States, since this
rulemaking does not impose
requirements or prohibitions contained
hi HSWA. Thus this regulation will be
applicable only hi those States that do
not have final authorization for the non-
HSWA base RCRA program.
hi a State authorizedto implement the
base RCRA program, the proposed
regulation would not be applicable until
the State revises its program to adopt
equivalent regulations under State law.
However, as with the original rule these
proposed changes an less stringent or
reduce the scope of the Federal
program. Therefore, although EPA
strongly encourages timely adoption,
authorized States are not required to
modify their programs to adopt
regulations consifftent with and
equivalent to this rulemaking. The
Agency plans to work with States to
encourage timely adoption of this rule
because of its benefits to the
development of treatment capacity.
IV. Effective Date
This rule is effective immediately
upon publication. HSWA amended
section 3010 of RCRA to allow rules to
become effective in less than 6 months
when the regulated community does not
need the 6-month period to come into
compliance. This is the case here.
because this rule reduces the existing
requirements for laboratories and test
facilities conducting treatability studies
on contaminated media. An effective
date 6 months after publication would
impose unnecessary expense and
regulatory burden upon those persons
the rule is designed to benefit, and
t
-------
Federal RegUter / Vol. 59. No. 34 / Friday. February 18. 1994 / Rules and Regulations 8365
t
might delay the achievement of the
rule's objective of improving CERCLA •"•'
response activities and RCRA corrective
actions by facilitating treatability
studies. These reasons also provide a
basis for making this rule effective-
immediately upon final promulgation
under the Administrative Procedures
Act. 5 U.S.C 553(d).
V. Regulatory Analyses
A. Executive Order 12866
OMB has determined that this rule is
not a significant rule within the
meaning of Executive Order 12866.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility
Act. 5 U.S.C 601 el seo.., whenever an
Agency is required to publish general
notice of rulemaking for any proposed
or final rule, it must prepare and make
available for public comment a
regulatory flexibility analysis that
describes the impact of the rule on small
entities (i.e., small businesses, small
organizations, and small governmental
jurisdictions).
Hie purpose of the original rule was
to eliminate time-consuming and costly
permitting requirements. This revision
extends the scope of activities which
may be conducted without requirements
to obtain permits, and will thus have
additional positive effects on small
entities.
This amendment will have no adverse
economic impact on small entities. In
fact, it should reduce the burden
imposed on small entities that conduct
treatability studies and comply with the
provisions of this rulemaking.
Accordingly, I hereby certify that this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This
regulation therefore does not require a
regulatory flexibility analysis.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain any new
information collection requirements
subject to OMB review under the
Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.
To the extent that this rule discusses
information collection requirements
imposed under existing regulations.
these requirements have been approved
by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork
Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C 3501 et seq..
and have been assigned OMB control
number 2050-0053.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 261
Hazardous waste. Recycling.
Dated: February fl, 1994.
Carol M. Browner,
Administrator.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, title 40 of the Code of Federal
Regulations is amended to read as
follows:
PART 261-4DEMTIFICATION AND
LISTING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
1. The authority citation for part 261
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42-U.S.C 6905. 6912(a). 6921.
6922. and 6938.
2. Section 261.4 is amended by
revising paragraphs (e)(2)(i) and
(e)(2)(ii). (e)(3). (0(3). (f](4), and (0(5) to
read as follows:
f261.4 Exclusion*.
(2,. . .
(i) The generator or sample collector
uses (in "treatability studies") no more
than 10.000 kg of media contaminated
with non-acute hazardous waste, 1000
kg of non-acute hazardous waste other
than contaminated media, 1 kg of acute
hazardous waste. 2500 kg of media
contaminated with acute hazardous
waste for each process being evaluated
for each generated waste stream: and
(ii) The mass of each sample shipment
does not exceed 10,000 kg; the-10.000 kg
quantity may be all media contaminated
with non-acute hazardous waste, or may
include 2500 kg of media contaminated
with acute hazardous waste, 1000 kg of
hazardous waste, and 1 kg of acute
hazardous waste; and
* • * * •
(3) The Regional Administrator may
grant requests on a case-by-case basis for
up to an additional two years for
treatability studies involving
bioremediation. The Regional
Administrator may grant requests on a
case-by-case basis for quantity limits in
excess of those specified in paragraphs
(e)(2) (i) and (ii) and (f)(4) of this
section, for up to an additional 5000 kg
of media contaminated with non-acute
hazardous waste. 500 kg of non-acute
hazardous waste. 2500 kg of media
contaminated with acute hazardous
waste and 1 kg of acute hazardous
waste:
(i) In response to requests for
authorization to ship, store and conduct
treatabilty studies on additional
quantities in advance of commencing
treatability studies. Factors to be
considered in reviewing such requests
include the nature of the technology, the
type of process (e.g.. batch versus
continuous), size of the unit undergoing
testing (particularly in relation to scale-
up considerations), the time/quantity of
material required to reach steady state'
operating conditions, or test design
considerations such as mass balance
calculations.
(ii) In response to requests for
authorization to ship, store and conduct
treatability studies on additional
quantities after initiation or completion
of initial treatability studies, when:
There has been an equipment or
mechanical failure during the conduct
of a treatability study; there is a need to
verify the results of a previously
conducted treatability study; there is a
need to study and analyze alternative
techniques within a previously
evaluated treatment process; or there is
a need to do further evaluation of an
ongoing treatability study to determine
final specifications for treatment.
(iii) The additional quantities and
timeframes allowed in paragraph (ej(3)
(i) and (ii) of this section are subject to
all the provisions in paragraphs (e) (1)
and (e)(2) (iii) through (vi) of this
section. The generator or sample
collector must apply to the Regional
Administrator in the Region where the
sample is collected and provide in
writing the following information:
(A) The reason why the generator or
sample collector requires additional
time or quantity of sample for
trealability study evaluation and the
additional time or quantity needed,'
(B) Documentation accounting for all
samples of hazardous waste from the
waste stream which have been sent for
or undergone treatability studies
including the date each previous sample
from the waste stream was shipped, the
quantity of each previous shipment, the
laboratory or testing facility to which it
was shipped, what treatability study
processes were conducted on each
sample shipped, and the available
results on each treatability study;
(C) A description of the technical
modifications or change in
specifications which will be evaluated
and the expected results;
(D) If such further study is being
required due to equipment or
mechanical failure, the applicant must
include information regarding the
reason for the failure or breakdown and
also include what procedures or
equipment improvements have been
made to protect against further
breakdowns; and
(E) Such other information that the
Regional Administrator considers
necessary.
W
(3) No more than a total of 10.000 kg
of "as received" media contaminated
with non-acute hazardous waste. 2500
-------
8388 Federal Register / Vol. 59. No. 34 / Friday. February 18. 1994 / Rules and Regulations
kg of madia contaminated with acute
hazardous waste or 2SO kg of other "as
received" hazardous waste is subject'to
initiation of tnatment in all treatability
studies in any single day. "As received"
waste refers to the waste as received in
the shipment from the generator or
sample collector. .
(4) Hie quantity of "as received"
hazardous waste stored at the facility for
the purpose of evaluation in treatability
studies does not exceed 104)00 kg, the
total of which can include 10,000 kg of
media contaminated with non-acute
hazardous waste. 2500 kg of media
contaminated with acute hazardous
waste. 1000 kg of non-acute hazardous
wastes other than contaminated media.
and 1 kg of acute hazardous waste. This
quantity limitation does not include
treatment materials (including
nonhazardous solid waste) added- to "as
received" hazardous waste!
(5) No more than 90 days have
elapsed since the treatability study for
the sample was completed, or no more
than one year (two years for treatability
studies involving bioremediation) have
elapsed since the generator or sample
collector shipped the sample to the
laboratory or testing facility, whichever
date first occurs. Up to SOD kg of treated
material from a particular waste stream
from treatability studies may be
archived Ear future evaluation up to five
years from the date of initial receipt.
Quantities of materials archived are
counted against the total storage limit
for the facility.
• •••'•
(FR Doc. 94-3745 riled 2-17-94; A:45 im|
I
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9S41.00-21
SPA 15
I
Revision Checklist 130 Summary'
Rule Title: Hazardous Waste Identification and Listing of Hazardous
Waste; Recycled Used Oil Management Standards
Checklist Title: Recycled Used Oil Management Standards; Technical
Amendments and Corrections II
Reference: 59 £B 10550-10560
Promulgation Date: March 4, 1994
Effective Date: April 4, 1994
Cluster: RCRA Cluster IV
Provision Type: Both HSWA and Non-HSWA
Linkage: Revision Checklists 19, 112 and 122
Optional: No
Summary: This rule clarifies the existing pipeline exemption as promulgated by the
September 10, 1992 rule (57 Eg 41566; Revision Checklist 112) and expands the
exemption from the Part 279 requirements to other petroleum refinery applications.
Specifically, EPA clarifies that the exemption from the used oil management standards did
not intend to exclude used oil mixed with crude oil or natural gas liquids (hereinafter
referred to as "crude oil") in pipeline units (e.g. stock tanks, production separators) prior to
being introduced into the crude oil pipeline. The rule also expands the used oil exemption
to include transportation and/or storage of mixtures of small amounts of used oil (i.e. less
than 1 %) and crude oil destined for insertion into a petroleum refining facility process at a
point prior to crude distillation or catalytic cracking. Also exempted from the Part 279
standards are used oil that is inserted into the petroleum refining facility process after
distillation or catalytic cracking operations and used oil that incidentally enters and is
recovered from a refinery's hydrocarbon recovery system or wastewater treatment
system, provided these used oils meet certain specifications or handling requirements.
This rule also expands the transfer facility definition to allow used oil to be held for more
that 24 hours but less than 35 days prior to an activity performed pursuant to
279.20(b}(2).
Finally, this rule corrects errors in the May 3, 1993 technical 'amendment (58 £R 26420;
Revision Checklist 122) to the September 10,1992 rule.
State Authorization: This rule is placed in RCRA Cluster IV. The State modification
deadline is July 1, 1995 (or July 1, 1996 if a State statutory change is necessary)1. As
explained in the preamble to the May 3, 1993 Technical Correction to the September 10,
1992 rule, EPA is treating the majority of the final used oil management standards in the
same manner as "non-HSWA" Subtitle C requirements. However, provisions that were
issued under HSWA authority in the November 29, 1985 rule (50 FR 49201; Revision
'Note that the preamble to this rule incorrectly lists the due dates as "July 1, 1994 or July 1,
1995 if a statutory change fs necessary." These are the due dates for RCRA Cluster III rather than
RCRA Cluster IV.
SUM 130.15-3/23/94
(Primed: 21/12/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
Revision Checklist 130 Summary (cont'd)
Checklist 19) and recodified fh part 279 (specifically, 279.10, 279.11 and portions of
279.1 and Subparts G and H of Part 279) remain HSWA requirements and will continue to
be enforced by EPA until a State becomes authorized for them. This rule amends both
HSWA and non-HSWA provisions. The standards promulgated by the March 4,1994 rule
at 279.20(g), 279.41 (c), 279.46(a)(5), and the revision of the transfer facility definition
279.48(b)(5) are less stringent than or reduce the scope of the existing Federal
requirements. Thus, authorized States are not required to modify their programs to adopt
the provisions addressed by these citations. The remaining provisions need to be adopted,
however.
The State Revision Application must include applicable regulations, AG statement
addendum. Revision Checklist 130, other associated checklists and other application
materials, i.e. a project description and an MOA, as determined by the Regional office.
Attorney General Statement Entry: Subsection XX E in the Model Revision Attorney
General's Statement should be revised to read as follows:
E. State statutes and regulations provide used oil management
standards for used oil generators, transporters, processors, re-refiners,
burners, and marketers as indicated in Revision Checklist 112, 122 and 130.
Federal Authority: Federal Authority: RCRA §§ 1004, 1006, 2002, 3001,
3014 and 7004; 40 CFR Parts 260, 261, 266 and 279 as amended
September 10, 1992 {57 EB41566), May 3, 1993 (58 £R 26420) and
March 4, 1994 (58 Ffi 10550).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Enactment and Adoption
Remarks of the Attorney General
SUM 130.15-3/23/94
(Prim** 21/12/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9841.00-21
SPA 15
t
RGRA REVISION CHECKLIST 130
Recycled Used Oil Management Standards;
Technical Amendments and Corrections II
59 £B 10550-10560
March 4, 1994
(RCRA Cluster IV, HSWA and Non-HSWA provisions)
Notes: 1) This rule provides clarifying amendments to the recycled used oil management
standards rule, published September 10, 1992 (57 PR 41566; Revision Checklist 112} and
expands the exemption from the Part 279 requirements to other petroleum refinery applications.
This rule also corrects errors in regulations that appeared in the May 3, 1993 rule Federal Register
(58 F_B 26420; Revision Checklist 122).
2) As stated in the preamble to the May 3, 1993 Technical'Correction to the September 10,
1992 rule, EPA is treating the majority of the final used oil management standards in the same
manner as "non-HSWA" Subtitle C requirements. However, provisions that were issued under
HSWA authority in the November 29, 1985 rule (50 FR 49201; Revision Checklist 19) and
recodified in part 279 by the September 10, 1992 rule (specifically 279.10, 279.11, and portions
of 279.1 and Subparts G and H) remain HSWA requirements and will continue to be enforced by
EPA until a State becomes authorized for them. The HSWA provisions changed by this checklist
are designated by a " •" (diamond symbol).
3) The standards promulgated in the March 4, 1994 rule at 279.20(g), 279.41 (c), 279.46(a)(5),
279.46{b)(5) and the revision to the transfer facility definition are less stringent than or reduce
the scope of the existing Federal requirements. Thus, authorized States are not required to
modify their programs to adopt the provisions addressed by these citations. States are required
to adopt the other provisions addressed by this checklist, however.
4) States are encouraged to apply for Checklists 112, 122 and 130 at the same time. A
checklist which consolidates the Checklist 112, 122 and 130 provisions has been developed to
help States apply for these checklists concurrently. States that have already adopted Revision
Checklists 112 and 122 are encouraged to adopt Revision Checklist 130 as soon as possible.
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
PART 279 - STANDARDS FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF USED OIL
SUBPART A - DEFINITIONS ^
DEFINITIONS
add, in alphabetical order,
definition of "petroleum
refining facility"
279.1
•
March 4, 1994-Page 1 of 7
DCL130.15 - RtviM* 3/24/94
Printed: 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 130: Recycled Used Oil Management Standards;
Technical Amendments and Corrections II (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
t remove comma after
"storage areas"; insert "and
no longer than 35 days"
after "24 hours"; replace
"and no longer than 35
days" after "normal course
of transportation" with "or
prior to an activity
performed pursuant to
279.20(b)(2)'
1
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
279.1 "used oil
transfer facility*
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
^K
^B
BROJV
IN SCOPE
SUBPART B - APPLICABILITY
APPLICABILITY
in the last sentence,
remove phrase "for the cost
of $110.00."
• delete phrase "and is not
listed in subpart D of part
261 of this chapter"; insert
"ignitable-only" before
"mineral spirits" and
"resultant" before "mixture
does not exhibit"
t replace old paragraph with
new heading "Used oil
introduced into crude oil
pipelines or a petroleum
refining facility"
t add new paragraph; used
oil mixed with crude oil or
natural gas liquids for
insertion into a crude oil
pipeline is exempt from the
Part 279 requirements; this
used oil is subject. to Part
279 requirements prior to
mixing of used oil with
crude oil or natural gas
liquids
279.10(b)(1)(ii)
279.10(b)<2)(iii)
279.10(g)
279.10(g)(1)
A
1
•
•
March 4, 1994 - Page 2 of 7
DO.130.1S
: 3/24/94
12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 130: Recycled Used Oil Management Standards:
Technical Amendments and Corrections II (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
t add new paragraph;
mixtures of used oil and
crude oil or natural gas
liquids containing less than
1 % used oil being stored or
transported to crude oil
pipeline or petroleum
refining facility for insertion
into refining process at a
point prior to crude
distillation or catalytic
cracking are exempt from
the Part 279 requirements
t add new paragraph; used
oil inserted into petroleum
refining facility process
before crude distillation or
catalytic cracking without
prior mixing with crude oil
exemption is exempt from
the Part 279 requirements
provided used oil
constitutes less than 1 % of
crude oil feed to any
petroleum facility process
unit at any time; this used
oil is subject to Part 279
requirements prior to
insertion into the petroleum
refining facility process
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
-
279.10(g)(2)
279.1 0(g){3)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EOIHV.
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
I
March 4, 1994 - Page 3 of 7
DCL130.15
• fttvirad: 3/24/94
Printed: 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 130: Recycled Used Oil Management Standards;
Technical Amendments and Corrections II (cont'd)
t
FEDERAL HEQUWEMENTS
t add new paragraph; except
as provided in
279.10(g) (5), used oil
introduced into petroleum
refining facility process
after crude distillation or
catalytic cracking is exempt
from the Part 279
requirements only if used
oil meets 279.1 1
specifications; this used oil
is subject to Part 279
requirements prior to
insertion into petroleum
refining facility process
t add new paragraph; used
oil incidentally captured by
hydrocarbon recovery
system or wastewater
treatment system as part of
routine process operations
at petroleum refining facility
and inserted into the
petroleum refining facility
process is exempt from the
Part 279 requirements;
exemption does
not extend to used oil
intentionally introduced into
a hydrocarbon recovery
system
t add new paragraph; tank
bottoms from stock tanks
containing exempt mixtures
of used oil and crude oil or
natural gas liquids are
exempt from the Part 279
requirements
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
279.10(g)(4)
279.1 0(g)(5)
279.10(g)(6)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
-
LESS
STNN-
GENT
MOK
STRIN-
GENT
BftoMK
IN SCOPE
t
March 4, 1994 - Page 4 of 7
DCL130 15 -RcvMd 3/24/94
Pimud 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 130: Recycled Used Oil Management Standards;
Technical-Amendments and Corrections II (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
FEDERAL RCHA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
SUBPART C - STANDARDS FOR USED GENERATORS
APPLICABILITY
redesignate existing
paragraph 279.20(b)(2) as
279.20{bH2)(i); insert
"Except as provided in
paragraph (b){2)(ii) of this
section," at the beginning
of the sentence
add new subparagraph;
generators who perform the
following activities are not
processors provided the
used oil is generators on-
site and is not being sent
off-site to a burner of on- or
off-specification used oil
fuel:
filtering, cleaning, or
otherwise reconditioning
used oil before returning it
for reuse by generator
separating used oil from
wastewater generated on-
site to make the
wastewater acceptable for
discharge or reuse under
CWA or other applicable
Federal regulations
governing the management
or discharge of
wastewaters
using oil mist collectors to
remove small droplets of
used oii from in-plant air to
make plant air suitable for
continued recirculation
279.20(b)(2)(i]
279.20(b)(2)(ii)
279.20(b)(2)(ii)(A)
279.20(b)(2)(ii)(B)
279.20(b)(2)(ii)(C)
-
t
March 4, 1994 - Page 5 of 7
DCL130.15
: 3/24/34
12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 130: Recycled Used Oil Management Standards;
Technical Amendments and Corrections tl (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
draining or removing used
oil from materials
containing or contaminated
with used oil in order to
remove excessive oil
pursuant to 279.10(c)
filtering, separating or
reconditioning used oil
before burning it in a space
heater pursuant to 279.23
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
279.20
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 130: Recycled Used Oil Management Standards;
Technical Amendments and Corrections II (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
add new subparagraph;
intermediate rail
transporters not required to
sign record of delivery
redesignate existing
paragraph 279.46{b){5) as
279.46(b)(5)(i); insert
"Except as provided in
paragraph (b)(5Hii) of this
section," at the beginning
of the sentence
add new subparagraph;
intermediate rail
transporters not required to
sign record of delivery
FEDERAL HCRA CITATION
279.46(a)(5)(ii)
279.46(b)(5)(i)
279.46(b)(5)(ii)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STWN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
t
SUBPART F - STANDARDS FOR USED OIL PROCESSORS AND RE-REFINERS
REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION FOR USED OIL
in the last sentence,
remove phrase "for the cost
of $110.00."
279.53(c)
SUBPART G - STANDARDS FOR USED OIL BURNERS WHO BURN OFF-SPECIFICATION USED
OIL FOR ENERGY RECOVERY
REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION FOR USED OIL
in the last sentence,
remove phrase "for the cost
of $110.00."
279.63(c)
March 4, 1994 - Page 7 of 7
DO.130.1S - RwiMd: 3/24/94
Prmnd. 12/21/94
-------
t
-------
I3O
I
Friday
March 4, 1994
PartV
Environmental
Protection Agency
40 CFR Parts 271 and 279
Hazardous Waste Management System;
Identification and Listing of Hazardous
Waste; Recycled Used Oil Management
Standards; Final Rule
-------
10550 Federal Register / Vol. 59. No. 43 / Friday. March 4. 1904 / -Rules and Regulation*
ENVKONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Par* 271 and 279
j MentMlcatteH and Ustfnfl of
HmvdCNM Wasjiej Recycled Uaed OH
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTON; Final rule.
SUMMARY: On September 10,1992. EPA
exempted uwd oil inserted into crude
oil pipeline* from the part 279 used oil
t standards. EPA is today
clarifying the existing pipeline
exemption mn^ expandins! the
i to other etrotoum refinery
. Today's doc
or natural gas liquids (hereinafter
referred to as "crude oil") in pre-
pipeUne units (e,g., stock tanks.
production separators) prior to being
introduced into the crude oil pipeline.
In addition, today's rule expands the
used oil exemption to include
transportation and/or storage of
mixtures of ffriffll •rftf"'"t* of used oil
(i.e.. less than 1%) and crude oil that are
destined for insertion into a petroleum
refining facility process at a point prior
to crude distillation or catalytic
cracking.
Today's rule exempts from the part
2 79 standards, used oil that is inserted
into the petroleum refining faciUry
process after distillation or catalytic
cracking operations provided tint the
i the used oil specification
prior to insertion.
Today's rale also exempts from die '
part 279 standards used oil that ,
incidentally enters and is recovered
from a refinery's hydrocarbon recovery
system or wastewater treatment system
(i.e., process sewer, storm sewer, or
wastewater treatment units), if the
recovered used oil is subsequently
inserted into the petroleum refinery
process.
In addition, today's rule expands the
definition of transfer facility to allow
used oil to be held more than 24 hours
but less than 35 days prior to specified
activities.
Finally. EPA is today amending the
used oil processor standards to clarify
that a specific set of on-site
B, filtering, and separation
In regulation* that appeared in the May
3.1998. Federal Register.
EFFECTIVE DATE: April 4,19M.
ADDRESSES: The regulatory docket far
thu niiffiriMVlT)g la available for public
inspection at room 2427. US.
Environmental Protection Agency, 401
M Street SW.. Washington, DC 20460
from 9 a.m. to 4 pan.. Monday through
Friday, except for Federal holidays. The
docket number is F-44-UOTA-FFFFF
The public must make an appomtmecj
to review docket materials by calling
(202) 260-9327. The public may copy a
of 100 pages from any.
the exemption from the used oil
tandards did not intend to
ised oil mixed with crude oil area
regulatory document at no coat.
Additional copies cost $.20 per page.
FOR FURTHER MFORMATION CONTACT; For
general information COB**T* the RCRA
Hotline. Office of Solid Waste. US. ~
Environmental Protection Agency. 401
M Street SW.. Washington. DC 20460;
Telephone (800) 424-4346 (toll free) or.
in the Washington DC. metropolitan
ea at (703) 920-9610.
For information on specific aspects of
this rule, contact Ms. Eydie Pines.
telephone (202) 26073509. US. EPA.
401 M Street SW.. Washington. DC
SUPPLEMENTARY MFORMATION: The
contents of today's preamble an Hated
in the following outline:
I. Authority.
O Background.
A Sammy of leeent Regulatory Actions
IVrtasBiagtoUssdOiL ' *
l. Summary of May 20.1M2.I
2 Seamy af September 10,1992.
FefrsM Register NoUM.
3 MayX 19M.«nd)UM 17.IMS
ComcrkB Notices.
B. Summary of the 1965 Commentt.
C» JMPPPsgy of M01 OonuTKBtaV
•L Aaarjraboi New Part 279 PraviaiaBB.
A. Sunnuy off ComuMDto DDB InftnM
activities were not intended to be
covered under the used oil-processor
standards. EPA is also correcting errors
undoOi
C Used Oil Introduced into'Crude OH
Pipelines or Petroleum Refiaeda*.
1. Used Oil Introduced into Crude OH
Pipeline*.
2. Storage and Transportation of Mbcmres
of Used Oil and Crude QU.
3. Used (Ml Inserted into tbe Petroleum
Refining Process without Piter Mixing
end Mixtures of Greater Then One
Percent Used Oil.
4. Uwd Oil Inserted Into tee Petroleum
Refining Process after Crude Distillation
or Catalytic Cracking.
5. Ueed Oil Captured by me Refinery's
Hydrocarbon Recovery System or
Wastewater Treatment System apA * ,
Inserted into Petroleum Refilling Process.
6. Stock Tank Bottoms.
IXUssdOUTienspotttBon.rMhHrinBof
Transfer Facility..
E. Used Oil Preceding by Generator! and
Transfer Faculties.
1. Definition of Used Oil ProoMsor.
(A) ReoondraoaiBg ustd oil betote
ntuiningitfivmiMbyUMgnurator.
(B) SBpantiiig uied oil from waswwater to
make wastewaiat acceptable fee
discharge or nuat.
(Q U«ing oil mist ooUedon to remote •
diopMs of u«ed oil from la-plant air to
make plant air suitable far continued
rediculatton.
(D) Removing used oil from materials
containing or otherwise oootamiiiated
with used oil in order to remove
•xoMsive oil.
(E) Filtering, separating, or otherwise
reconditioning used oil before burning it
in a •pace heater.
F RettrictiOMontranspoitenwhoannot
also prooMion or n-fefioen and
cbangai to the definition of transfer
bdlity.
G. Tracking.
H. Correction to the Regulatory Language.
1. Requirement* for eonconaent authority
2. RebuttabU Pmamptton.
3. Chancteri*tic H"Wt""« Wtote.
L Correction to the Preamble Language.
IV State AuthorixatioB.
V Executive Order 12866.
VL Paperwork Reduction Act
VTL Regulatory Ptwoblilty Ad.
unistrative Procedure Act
lgated today
Authority
, The regulations promugated to
are issued under the authority of
sections 1004. 1006. 2002(a). 3014. and
7004 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act. as
amended by the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act. and as amended by
the Used Oil recycling Act, as amended,
42 U.SJC. 6903. 6905. 6912(a). 6935. and
6974.
IL Background
A. Summary of Recent Regulatory
Action* Pertaining to Used Oil
1 Summary of May 20. 1992, Federal
Register Notice
On May 20. 1992. EPA published a
fiq^i n«ring determination for used oils
that are destined for disposal (see 57 FR
21524). The Agency determined that
used oils destined for disposal did not
have to be listed as a hazardous waste
because used oils tto not typically and
frequently meet the technical criteria for
listing a waste as hazardous. EPA gave
considerable attention, in reaching its
determination, to tbe current Federal
regulations that govern the management
of used oils that are disposed, including
the requirement for used oil that
exhibits a characteristic of hazardous
waste under subtitle C of RCRA.
The May 20. 1992. Federal Register
notice also Included a categorical
exemption from fl"* definition of
hazardous waste in §261.4 for non-
terne-plated used oil filters that have
been hot-drained to remove used oil.
I
-------
Federal Register / Vol. 59. No..43 / Friday. March 4, 1994 / Rules and Regulations 10551
I
EPA based this exemption an data
submitted to the Agency indicating that
the*a filters do not typically andf
frequently exhibit the toxicity
characteristic.
2. Summary of September 10.1992.
Federal Register Notice
On September 10.1992, EPA
promulgated a final listing decision for
used oils that are recycled and
management standards for used oil.
codified at 40 CFR part 279 (see 57 FR
41566). EPA determined that used oil
destined for recycling did not have to be
listed as a hazardous waste because the
used oil did not meet the technical
criteria for listing a waste as hazardous,
particularly in light of the new
management standards and other federal
requirements which control the risks
posed by improper management of used
oiL The standards cover used oil
generators, transporters, processors, re-
refiner*, off-specification burners and
marketers. The standards included an
exemption from the management
standards for used oil placed directly in
a crude oil pipeline.
3. May 3.1993. and June 17.1993
Correction Notices
On May 3.1993, EPA published
technical amendments and connections
to the May 20,1992 and September 10.
1992. Federal Register Notices (see 56
FR 26421). On June 17.1993. EPA
corrected several errors in the May 3.
1993, notice (see 56 FR33341).
8. Summary of the 2005 Comments
Regarding Used Oti Mtxed Mm Chide
OU Destined for Refineries
On November 29,1985. EPA proposed
to list all used oil as a hazardous waste
(50 FR 49248). Commenten responded
that used oil mixed with crude oil be '
exempt from such regulation because
fha firifti quantities of used oil mtmni
with crude oil posed no threat to the
environment when refined with crude
oil .
C. Summary of 1991 Comments
On September 23,1991. EPA
proposed that the two exemptions from
subtitle C requirements promulgated in
1985 (see 40 CFR 261.6(aK3) (vMviii))
for oil-bearing hazardous waste and
fuels derived from these wastes, also
refineries; and (2) fuels derived from
those used oils.
Commenters (mainly .the primary
petroleum refining industry) stated that
if EPA chose to list used ou as
hazardous waste, the Agency should
exempt used oil that is reintroduced
into the refinery process from hazardous -
waste or used oil management standards
requirements. Commenters further
stated that if EPA did not adopt this
exemption, the entire refinery process
could be subject to hazardous waste
management requirements, including
permits. Commenten stated that this
would be unwarranted because the
reintroduction of used oil into the
the crude oil or finished petroleum
product Other commenters stated diat
refiners that handle used oil should be
subject to the same requirements for
used oil management as are used oil re-
refiners.
Commenten from the primary
petroleum refining industry also stated
that EPA should not limit the exemption
to those instances where used oil is
inserted before fluid catalytic cracking
or distillation, since other conversion
and distillation processes in the refinery
would also remove, alter or immobilize
impurities in the olL They asserted that
limiting the point of insertion could
foreclose the future development of
used oil recycling activities. These
commenton also stated that limiting me
insertion point could preclude refineries
from accepting DIY oil. Commenters
asserted that DIY oil might have to •
undergo certain pre-processing at •
refineries prior to its insertion into me
standards«
management
apply to used oils. (56 FR 48026.46042)
EPA proposed exemptions from the
used oil """"p'Mwn* requirements
(whether or not EPA ultimately listed
used oil as a hazardous waste) for:(l)
Used oils that are reinserted as
feedstocks at primary petroleum
under the proposed exemption, thi
• • » •. _ * *
would be a hazardous waste activity.
Commenten stated that these activities
an part of the refiningprocess.
petroleum industry further stated that
EPA should extend the exemption to,
to lined "^ tftfrtffi intft tfn • * *
i at marketing, E&P and pipeline
> for use in the refinery process.
They asserted that used oil recovered
bom oil and gas exploration and
production is placed in pipelines and
trucks and returned to the refinery from
ether petroleum f-dUties. Commenter*
stated that the recovered oils are useful.
valuable nw materials that an
reintroduced into the crude stream for
their economic value.
m. Analysis of New Part 279 ProTiaiaas
On September 10,1992. EPA
--••••• • - - i for
promulgated a **"•* H«HM dffrl
used oils that are recycled and
simi
in 40 CFR part 279 for
of used oil under RCRA section 3014.
Under § 279.10(g) of part 279, EPA
granted an exemption for used oils
introduced directly into crude oil
pipelines from part 279 standards at the
point at which they are introduced. EPA
did not address the proposed
exemptions for used oil inserted into the
petroleum refinin;
either prior.to or after crude distillation
or catalytic cracking.
The American Petroleum Institute
filed a petition for review of the
September 10,1992, rule, on December
8,1992, raising the issue that EPA had
not addfessed the proposed exemptions
for petroleum refining, production, and
transportation in the September 10.
1992, final rule. Today's rule responds
to comments and addresses outstanding
issues related to used oil and petroleum
refining facility processes.
A. Summary of Conunemta From
Interested Katies
Today's rule was distributed in draft
form for comment to the litigants and
intervenors concerning the 1992 rule.
and other concerned members of the
regulated community. States, and
environmental groups. The primary
ants received on the
draft and EPA'a responses-to those
comments an summarized below.
EPA received several comments from
the petroleum industry on the
exemption from part 279 for storage and
transportation of mixtures of used oil
and crude oil that contain less than 1%
used oil and an destined for insertion
into petroleum refining process. These
commenten objected primarily to
provisions in the draft final rule limiting
the exemption to mixtures **>•< T^in
less than 1% used oiL The commenten
also objected to limiting the amount of
used oil that can be directly inserted
into the petroleum refining process to
1% of the crude oil process unit
throughput at any given time. EPA has
retained the 1% amit in both cases in
today's final rule for reasons discussed
in section OLfi.2 of ***** preamble.
EPA received comments from used oil
n-nfinen (te., "secondary" petroleum
•industry—e type of used oil processor)
regarding the regulatory status of
petroleum refineries that receive used
oil from off-site and store the used oil
on-sito before mixing It with crude oiL
The draft rule proposed to regulate
petroleum refining facilities as used oil
transfer facilities in these
dream-tan
liters stated.
however, that petroleum refiners that
receive used oil from off-site pose the
t potential concerns from receipt of
-------
10552 Wtitnl legMor / Vol. SO. No. 43 f Friday. March 4, 1994 / Roles and
adulterated wed oil and improper
of used ofl n re-refiners and
far used oil
priortomixing. EPA agrees and
has revised the draft ink accordingly.
These change* am discussed in greater
detailbebw.
EPA also received numerous
anuaaots on provisions clarifying what
constitute* a wad oil processor.
ProvteMoc contained in the draft
docuineirt would have prohibited both
on- and olf-sto burning of used oil
generated from specified activities that
EPA is today clarifying are not subject
to the used oil processor standards.
Commenten stated that the used oil
genentad fromthase activities would be
suitable for burning in accordance with
the part 279. subpartG standards and
thatburning should not be further
restrictod* In response t
nrnnmftnts. EPA has decided to allow
on-site bunting of the used oil generated
from these activities but has retained the
prohibition against off-site burning. The
dndtloB if *^'*trin^J in
t a regulatory
section OLC of today's preamble.
B. Section 279.1—Definition of
PetzoleamtoflniagFaality
Today's rate establishes a
definition far "petroleum rel
fadlity.-EPA beheves it is necessary to
clear distinction between whatthe
Agency consideis to be and regulates as
primary petroleum refining facilities
and facilities Out EPA considers to be
used oil re-refiners for regulatory
purposes. Under today's rule,
"petroleum refining facility" is defined
as follows:
primarily angifMl la
tUs7nsiduBlfiielo8a
I feel
disnuehonof
2911}.
A U
facility that processes medott to
EPA is
and used oil
employ similar
material that constitutes the primary
initial feed to the process, m order for
a facility to" he considered • petroleum
refining facility, the material fed to the
front end of the refining process must be
comprised primarily of crude oil. In
ordtf to be considered a used oil re- .
refiner, the material entering the front
end of the process must be comprised
primarily of used oiL
C. Section 279.1^-Uwed OH
Introduced Mo Owfc Of* Pipelines or
/Vfroieuin Rffining Focuitin
l. Section 279.10(g)(l>-U*ed Oil
Introduced Into Crude Oil Pipelines
The September 10.1992, final used
oil regulations provided an exemption
at §279.10(g) from management
standards for used oil that to placed
directly into a crude oil pipeline (see 57
FR 41613). Today's rule replaces
§279.10(1) with 1279.10^X1) which
clarifies the original intent of the
pipeline examption. Section 279.10%) of
the September 10.1992. final mto
I that "Used oil mat ia placed
jectiy mto a erode oil. oil or natural
gas pipeline is subject to the
a~ - ^ds of (put 279)
into thtspinettDB. Onca th» used oil is
introdacedtothapipaUaa, the material
Is 0x0npt uOD ttsst mjuinDflUtat o* [put
279|.-
EPA •conoanssd that the phrase.
•^pbosddmMdyiotoacnideoUor .
MallnffJBll alAA VllllfJilMl_n aruta Iw H*anttUv
*—*. m 1 A ^_^h*B» ••b^^BAi ^k^v^hM^ka*!** tSii mwt
mtei|MVWl to flppiy more narrowly tnan
the Agency had mtendad. EPA
iinirfrilniiit IBT* it if itimianl prafltr^
typically lees than l%. Mm crude oil in
other tankt
pipaanetoth*.
fadltty 0*, rrfrfspsifaM units), ft
not EPA'* JMssst toa9BCsB>sB)iiaad oil mat
is nnxedvftm crude oil lathees pra-
pipaiine unfts from the j 279.10(s)
intended to include mis practfee within
.«- - • mmMmm ^ I a| , •
tnameaBingoi^ainotinsertioB\.
»used cslfe typically toserted
_ > '& m.m .- * » •
into!
i units, to <
inotKPA*a
o^efined by todV«niie, petroleum
refining ncillttes and used oil ie-
~ ~
intent. Tosky'sraiB iwiass the language
of the exemptittt todarify (hat used oil
maybatnsartsdmtothe
pn-pipeUne units (1
S 279. It abould be noted here that
>279.HXgX«
site locations to the petroleum refining
facility. The exemption does not apply
to pipelines mat convey crude oil bom
one on-site location within a petroleum
refinery to another. If such on-site
piping contains used oil. it is exempt
only if it Qualifies nioKiw
§§ 279.10(g)(2H5) discussed below.
Also, if processing of the used oil is
performed prior to mixing with crude
oil in these pre-pipeline units, such
processing mnaini subject to the part
279. subpaitF standards for tned oil
processors and re-refiners. Used oil that
is generated and stored at the pipeline
is subject to'the used oil generator
standards prior to mixing with crude
oiL Used oil that is transported to the
pipeline and immediately mixed with
crude oil or stand for less than 24 hours
prior to such mixing is subject to ail
SubpartE transporter standards except
for §279.45 which applies to transfer
facilities. Used oil that is transported to
and subsequently stored at «he pipeline
for more than 24 hours and toss than 35
days prior to mixing wtm crude oil is
subject to all the part 279, subpartE
- ^ ---- - •- --- -i ^^Hj*..
u»i»pui ten gaiiTiar «acnny
requirements.
2. Section 279.10(gX2)~Stmge and
Transportation of Mixtures of Used Oil
and Crude Oil •
Section 279.10(gX2)of today's rule
standard«xampuaatoindade:{l)
Mixtures of used oil aodfiudeoil •
containing lees than 1% used oil that
are being stored at the petroleum
refining facility or in discrete units
lerootefy located from the pipeline, as
long as the mixture is destined for the
refinery and inserted prior tocrude •
mj (9)
and crade oil
containing less than 1% used oil that
are beJBg transported (via truck, rail, or
vessel) to the petmleum refinery or the
pipeline for insertion Into the patratauai
refining process piior to crude
fuiiiiiiT exeuiptlon provided at
S279.10(g) did not apply either to
mixtures of used oil and crude oil that
an atortd aUhe petroleum refinery or
m remotely located units, or to the
U«iiSparuuionof mixtures of used oil
and oud* oiL The previous, more
naivow oxamMion was DasenflKi taa
assumtion mat used ofl was placed
tot into units
I
pip
gps Tost fa Bjntod to
wr crnoe oil from on-
via dinctiy connected to me pipemie
previously discussed). EPA assumed
ttiT^ *^* ii'i«iiift of nsed **fl •»«! crude ofl
occornd at tiba> point at which used oil
was inserted into te pipeline. EPA has
since learned howavvt. that mixing
freouently occurs at •xplontion and
-------
Federal Register / VoL 59. No. 43 / Friday, March 4. 1994 / Rulea and Regulationa 10553
I
i sites that am mmotoly
____ i from the pipeline or the
petroleum refinery.
For example, uffMJ oil generated
during on* and off-shore rtriP*Tig
activities (e-g. from compressors, tracks
and other heavy equipment) is routinely
mixed with crude oil in units (e.g/
production separators, seagoing vessels,
stock tanks, etc.) located at the
exploration and production site and
then transported, as a mixture, to the
pipeline or petroleum refining facility.
Depending on the location of the
drilling activities, the mixture of used
oil and crude oil may need to be
transported (by vessel, truck, rail, etc.)
to a separate location for introduction
into the pipeline or the petroleum
refining facility. In the case of off-shore
drilling sites for example, conveyance of
the mixture may involve multiple
modes of transportation (Lew from the
off-shore platform to land by vessel or
pipeline and then to the crude oil
pipeline by land-based transport).
Today's exemption coven all modes of
transportation of mixtures of used oil
and crude or natural gas liquids, as long
as the mixture ««^t«fp« less than 1%
used oil and is destined for insertion
• into a petroleum refining facility
process at a point prior to crude
distillation or catalytic cracking. In
addition, today's exemption coven
storage of mixtures of used oil and
crude oil, provided that the mixture
contains less than 1% used oil and la
inserted into a petroleum refining
facility process, prior to crude
distillation or catalytic cracking.
Used oil that is generated at
exploration and production sites
continues to be subject to used oil
: generator «*»tiAtrf« pri
with crude oil such that it is exempt
under today> rule. Used oil that is
ortedtoor
stored at an exploration and production
site is subject to the transporter and
transfer facility standards, as applicable,
up until tiie point at which the used oil
is mixed with crude oil such that it is
exempt under $279.10(gK2). .
EPA is exempting mixtures of used oil
and crude oil held in discrete units at
• rennery or at remote locations because
the Agency understands that the amount
of used oil contained in these mixtures
is extremely small relative to the large
quantities of crude oil. m developing
today's rule, EPA held numerous
discussions with petroleum refinery
industry representatives regarding the
mixi""1™ amount of mod oil contained
in mixtures of used oil and crude oil
that an destined for insertion into •
petroleum refining process prior to
crude «ii«Hii«tlfln or catalytic ^T**"^1"g
Industry repnaentativea repeatedly
informed the Agency that used oil
constitutes less than 1% of these
today's rule, EPA held conference calls
with representatives from a number of
petroleum refining companies (a.g..
Mobil Oil Corporation and Phillip*
Petroleum Inc. J. The Agency also
conducted several site visits, including
visits to an Amoco refinery in Whiting,
Indiana and a Mobil Oil Corporation
refinery in Paulsboro, New Jersey. In
each case, EPA was informed that used
oil does not currently, and will not
comprise greater than 1% of the crude
oil/used oil mixture because of the sheer
volumes of crude oil that an
continuously being produced and
processed relative to the amount of used
oil that is generated at production site*
or refineries. This recent information la
consistent with comments submitted in
response to the 1989 Used Oil Proposed
Rule hi which &CT"P Company, USA
stated that the average percentage of
used oil in refinery feed stock stream*
is less than 0.02% and Texaco, me.
indicated that used oil would constitute;
no more than 0.01% of the refinery
input .
EPA does not believe his necessary
to apply the used oil management
standard* to the less than 1% fraction of
used oil that is bang held 1
in discrete units or transported fre
those units to the pipeline or the
petroleum refinery for recycling as part
of a mixture that it composed
overwhelmingly of crude at! In essence,
because of the high ratio of crude oil to
used oil. EPA considen the mixture to
be equivalent to crude oil for regulatory
purposes. EPA's part 279 standards
were designed to control those
particular risks associated with the
management of used oil (e.g., -
uncontrolled burning, improper storage
practices by used oil handlers) pursuant
to section 3014 of RCRA.
The reason for EPA's imposition of •
1% limit on the amount of used oil
contained in mixtures of used oil and
crude oil being stored or transported to
a crude oil pipeline or petroleum
refinery prior to insertion into the
refining process is that, while we have
determined that the «m*n amounts of
used oil that are being added to crude
oil under current practices pose no
incremental risk over normal crude oil.
we have riot evaluated whether larger
amounts of used oil abo pose no
incremental risk. Given the information
provided to EPA by the petroleum
refining industry regarding the Inherent
limitations on the amount of used oil
thrt ig or should be contained in -
mixtures of used oil and crude oil (La..
less than 1%), and given that EPA has
received no information, either recently.
or in response to previous nikmakings
that provides basis far an alternative
limit, the Agency sees no point in
imposing a Mgtt** cap. imposition of a
higher cap could have the effect of
encouraging mixing of used oil with
crude oU that would not otherwise
occur during the normal course of
Mtroleum refining operations. Such an
ttive might lead to increased
incremental risk from management of
large amounts of used oil, exempt from
the part 279 standards, at petroleum
refineries. EPA also concluded that a
less precise limit (LeS "do miaimis" or
"small amounts"), as was suggested by
some oommmtten from the petroleum
refining industry, would needlessly
causa uncertainty, given that EPA was
told repeatedly that amounts currently
Introduced are far less than 1%.
3. Section 278.10(gM3)—Used Oil
Inserted Into the Petroleum Refining
Process Without Prior Mixing and
Mixtures of Greater Than One Percent
UsedOil
As previously stated, under today's
rale, mixtures of used oil and crude oil
containing less than 1% used oil that
an transported to or stored at a
petroleum refinery, and an Introduced
prior to crude distillation or catalytic
GnduOflc uv 0xmipt uitau ptft 279
standards under $ 279.10tgX2). h is
EPA's understanding, based on
information received from petrol
industry rep;
atatii
petroleum
i, that used oil
i potentially be inserted directly into
the petroleum refining process prior to
crude distillation or catalytic cracking
without either CD Mixing the used oU
with crude oil feedstocks, or (2) pre-
processing of the used oil to ensure that
any contaminants in the used oil will
not raterfen with the refining process
(e.g., contaminants fouling a catalyst,
etc.). Baaed on this understanding,
today's exemption also applies to used
oil that is introduced directly into the
petroleum refining process at a point
prior to crude distillation or catalytic
cracking as long as the used oil
comprises toss than 1% of the crude oil
feed to a petroleum refining facility
process unit at any given time. Again,
because of the high ratio of crude oil to
used oil, EPA considen these mixtures
to be equivalent to crude oil for
regulatory purposes. Therefore, the
Agency believes mat this activity would
pose no significant increase in risk.
Used oifthatis inserted directly Into
the petroleum refining process (at a
volume of less than 1% of the crude oil
iven time) is
erefore exempt
-------
10554
/ Vol 59, No. 4» / Friday, Much 4, 1994 / Rubs and Regulations
from pat 279. (tlbe paint it which it
applies botntoused oil generated at the
patrolman nfining facility whore the
used oil is being inserted, and to UMd
oil generated o&tttelhat U collected
Agency will consider whether any
draft rule. EPA proposed to
refining facilities
doll from off-site as
refining facility Car insertion into the
refining process prior to crude
Used oil titst is inserted into the
i nfining process wiOunit first
j mixed witii crude oil feedstocks
(e.g. in crude oil stock tanks) is subject
to part 279 standards prior to Insertion.
Used oil dut is generated on-site and
duo stond widiout prior mixing and
used oU generated cm-site that
constitutes greater dan 1% of a mixture
of used and crude oil continues to be
subfect to dw part 279. subpart C
standards for generators. Widi dw
exception of used oil that is exempt
from dw part 279 standards because it
constitutes less ttwn 1% of a mixture of
used oU and crude oil. used oil diat is
generated off-site and dwn transported
to or stond at a petroleum refining
facility, continues to be subject to dw
part 279 requirements Le., to
iwhib
being" transported and to dw
requirements for used oil processors
mud trfl ttma*"r hrMltfot piri*1* ft*
"*^1>B However, EPA agrees widi
petroleum nfining facilities dwt receive
used oil from off-site pose dw same
potential concerns associated with
receipt of adulterated used oil and
improper storage of used oft as used oil
re-refiners. Petroleum nfining facilities
diat receive used oil from off-site may
not have adequate Information to ensure
diat dw used oil has not not been
improperly roixeo witii listed hazardous
waste. Also, the volumes of used oil that
may be managed require adequate
planning for dealing wife emerges
' isdu
releases. EPA has therefo
final nib to
refining tacil
rised
•ovide that petroleum
ities that receive and store
tr
«requirements for used oil
sportan and transfer fadlitfe
used ou from off-site are subject to the
used oil processor standards prior to
mixing. The principal effect of this •
change is that petroleum refiners that
receive used oil from off-site must
prepare a waste analysis plan to ensure
that the used oil has not been mixed
with hazardous waste and must
tito
with the waste
insertion into the petroleum nfining
process an subject to the used oil
rdt from the point at
to
which they receive the used oil up until
the point at which the used oil is
inserted into *^W |M^j^ii^Mwi refining
process. Finally, it is iffi
reiterate that the
under both Sf 279. _
279.10feX3) of today's rule apply at the
point ofinixing and only to mixtures
that contain law than 1% of used oiL
Although petroleum industry
i have raised concerns .
dut a 1% limit on dw amount of used
oilthat can be inserted directlyinto dw
f •*•*"••••» «»lii«t«ifl p»VM« may t>* •
technology Umlting, EPA has not
nceived any Information flat would
support dils position, nor has dw '.
Agency noatvsd information to support
an alternative bveL Hw Agency
ben^ves dwt by limiting dwamountoT
used oU dwt can be introduced dincdy
into dw nfining process exempt from
dw used oil processing standard!, it can\
better ensun against mixing only to
avoid conpliance widi dwpaxt^9
i available dwt dw 1% Unit w
analysis plan.
refineries wiU ha veto adopt or amend
emergency contingency plans to address
used oUm accordance with S279.S2 of
the used oil management standards.
4. Section 2T9.lO(gX4)-Used Oil
Inserted mto the Petroleum Refining
Process After Crude Distillation or
Catalytic Cracking
Uader S279.10(gX4}of today* rub,
used oil that is inserted into the
i nfiningjprocess after crude
1 from die part 279 standards
I that the used oil meete the
usedtiil ti"*i lf*ntift*i prior to Ip'iriMim
Used oil nmatomsubject to part 279
standards up '"<«ejtefinery's Hydr
Recovery System
Tnatment Syste
or Wastowater
Inserted In
Petroleum Refining P
Section 279.1
-------
Federal Jtegbtor / Vol. 59. Na 43 / Friday. March 4, 1904 / Rules and Regulations 10555
t
process. Oil (that may contain small
amounts of used oil) that has been
recovered from « nfining facility's
hydrocarbon recovery or wastewater .
treatment system is typically used as a
feedstock in petroleum refining to
produce more petroleum products. EPA
understands that used oil, generated
from routine refinery process operations
and that incidentally enters a refinery's
recovery or wastewater treatment
system (e.g.. drips, leaks, and spills from
compressors, valves, and pumps),
represents a small portion of the total oil
that enters (and is men recovered from)
the recovery or wastewater treatment
system. Thus, the oil recovered from the
system is more properly characterized
as crude feedstock than used oIL
Provided the used oil Is inserted into
.the petroleum refining process, EPA
believes that regulation under part 279
standards is unwarranted. This
exemption from the part 279 standards
does not extend to used oil which is
intentionally introduced into a
petroleum refinery's recovery or
wastewater treatment system (e.g.,
pouring collected used oil Into any part
of the hydrocarbon recovery system.
storm or process sewer system or Into
wastewater treatment units). Used oil
may not be introduced to the refinery's
hydrocarbon recovery or wastewater
treatment system as a way to avoid
meeting the conditions specified in
$279.10(g)(4).
For the purpose* of the exemption in
today's run, the examples cited in the
existing da minimi* wastewater
exclusion (§ 279.10(1)) provide guidance
on what types of releases toe refinery's
hydrocarbon recovery or wastewater
treatment system would be considered
"routine" or "incidental". The
exemption is intended to cover losses
from drippage. minor spillage, etc.. that
cannot be reasonably avoided. For
example, used ell that ha* been
collected from equipment or vehicle
maintenance activities and Intentionally
introduced into a refinery's wastewater
treatment system would not be exempt
under §279.1(g)(S) from the part 279
standards once recovered. Similarly.
used oil that is generated off-site and is
brought to the refinery may not be
added to any portion of the refinery's
wastewater treatment system (I*,
process sewer, storm sewer, or
wastewater treatment units), and stilib*
exempt under $279.10fgXS}onc»
recovered; suck oil fa clearty not -.
"incidentally captured" by the
refinery's wastewater treatment system.
In fact, unless specifically exempted
under §279.10(gX2) or §279.1O(gX3)of
today's rule, thu type of activity would
'meet the definition of used oil
processing under the existing used oil
,- management standards (see 40 CFR '
279.1)*
Today's rule does not preclude "
intentional introduction of used oil la to
the facility's recovered oil tanks. EPA is
aware that used oil from both on- and
off-site is often added directly to the
petroleum refining facility's recovered
oil tanks. Mixtures of used oil and
recovered oil that contain greater than
1% used oil are regulated as used oiL
Mixtures of used oil and recovered oil
that contain less than 1% used oil and
are Inserted into* the petroleum refining
process prior to crude tti«tMhtipn or
catalytic cracking an exempt from the
part 279 used oil management standards
ctivit]
vityperfb
'9.20(bX2;
id pursuant to
inaKement i
.Mixtures)
under § 279.10(g)(2). Mixtures of used
oil and recovered oil that contain less
than 1% used oil and an inserted into
the petroleum nfining process after
crude distillation or catalytic cracking
are exempt froraihe part 279 standards
(under S 279.lO(g)(4)) only if the used
oil meets *h* used oil specification prior
to mixing with recovered oiL
6. Section 279.10(g)(6)-Stock tank
Bottoms
Section 279.10(g)(6) of today's rule
exempts tank bottoms from stock tanks
containing exempt mixtures of used oil
and crude oil from the part 279
«t«nd»r«<« uim the actual mixtures of
used oil and crude oil, the bfrttfmt from
these mixtures an expected to contain
insignificant amounts of used oiL
Therefore, the Agency does not believe
•hat the bottffire from *«*A« (or other
units) T»*«i"inn mixtures of used oil
and crude oil should be subject to the
used oil ****** ^
§ 279.20M2). Under the amended
definition, as discussed below in section
F of this preamble, a site to which used
oil from oil-bearing electrical
transformers is transported for filtering
prior to nuse would be considered a
transfer facility under today's definition.
E. Section 279JHXbX2Wl-4Js*d Oil
Processing by Generators and Transfer
Facilities
Since the promulgation of the
September 10.1992. Used Oil „_
Management Standards, a number of
parties have raised concerns regarding
the definition of used oil processor and
the types of activities that an covered
by that definition. The commenters an
concerned that a broad construction of
the term processor inappropriately
includes a number of Very basic on-site
generator activities that the Agency did
not intend to regulate under the used oil
processor standards (e.g.
!^ to extend
tank bottoms an subject to all other
applicable requirements, i-e., the
§262.11 requirement to determine if .
they an hazardous waste.
D. Used OU Transportation
Section 278.1— Definition of Transfer
Facility
Today's rule revises the definition of
transfer facility to allow used oil to be-
held at a location (I.e.. a transfer facility)
temporarily prior to activities that are
not subject to the processor standards as
a result of today's rulemaUng. in the
September 10. 1992 final rule, a transfer
facility was defined as a transportation-
mlated facility when shipments of used
oil an held for more than 24 hours but
less than 35 days during the normal-
course of transportation. Todays-rule
expands that definition to allow used oil
to be held I for mow than 24 hours but
less than 35 days during the normal
course of transportation or prior to an -
the life of used oil, separation of used
oil from wastewater discharge, etc.).
EPA agrees that activities such as these,
when performed by the generator, wen
not intended to be covered under the
used oil processor standards because
used oil processing's not their primary
purpose, as explained below In greater
detail hi fact, too broad an
interpretation of the processor
definition may discourage
environmentally beneficial recycling
and waste minimization activities by
imposing an unwarranted regulatory
burden on owners and operators that
EPA did not intend to regulate as used
oil processors.
Therefore, today's rule revises the
used oil management regulations to
clarify the Agency's intent regarding the
definition of a used oil processor by
specifying those on-site maintenance,
filtering, and separation activities that
an not, and wen not intended to be
subject to the used oil processing
standards. Under today's rule,
generators * who only handle used oil in
a manner specified under
S 279i20(bX2Xii) •" not processors
provided that the used oil is generated
on-site and is not being sent directly off-
site to a burner of on-or off-
specification used oil fuel (Section
279.2uft>)(2HU} also applies to collection
lot)
'P
h •njrptnM. by tit*
dotlarwboM
tct flnt cram uttd oil to b*Fon» tubjMt to
itDdudttll
> predao* nt*d oil
«nd/oc ptnaai tad biilnautt who coUxa uod oil
from bMttboM* tad "do-lt-yoomlT oil chtnst*.
-------
10590
Register / VoL 59. No. 43 / Friday. Match 4. 1994 / Rules and Regulations
centers and aggregation points since
these entities an regulated as
believes that a prohibition
Activities that EPA did not intend to
ffl*fa _ J
oil is
specified on-site activities to off-site
burners provides the most practical and
effective way to ensura that activities
undertaken only to make used oil more
amenable for burning an subject to the
used oil processor standards.
1. Definition of Used Oil Processor
(A) Reconditioning used oil before
returning It for mise by title generator.
Under today's rule facility owners or
operators who clean i separate, or
otherwise recondition used oil
generated on-site and men reuse it an
not considered used oil processors.
provided mat the reconditioned used oil
to being reused by me owner or operator
who generated it Examples of activities
covered under this category include
filtering of metalworldng fluids for
reuse, and filtering and men replacing
oil from oil-bearing transformers and
turbines during routine maintenance.
Most manufacturing facilities have in
place central filtration systems designed
to remove contaminants from and
extend the Ufa of water-soluble metal
working fluids (e.g.; lubricants and
coolants), used in machining, grinding.
and boring equipment These filtration
systems an on-sita systems that filter
chips, metal fines, dirt, water, and other
contaminants from cutting fluids,
* icants and coolants used in
I operations. The filtration of
i materials is designed
to extend the Ufa of the reusable
coolants and lubricants and is
Today's rule clarifies that tills type of
filtration activity la not subject to the-
used oU Brooming standards when the
generator reuses the filtered o)L
Similarly, during regularly scheduled
maintenance of oil-bearing transformers
and turbines, the oU in the electrical
i or to make used oil
i fw th* production of •
used oil derived products). The Agency
is concerned that in sJhiartons where .
used oU is being filtered, separated or
* A»-_
and mat consequently, § 279.2001X2)01)
provisions may be used as a means to
avoid compliance with the used oil
processor standards (Le.. by persons
who claim not to be used oil processors
under the $279.20(bH2Xii) provisions
but whose primary purpose to to make '
the used ou mom suitable for burning).
Therefore. EPA believes it to necessary
purpose of the activity. The Agency
The filtering of the used
is done to extend theUis of the used
oil, not because me oil Is no longer
useful, and is therefne ancillary to the
• Mglfc—jfc§ •^««A|* Hiwl MIB! vtft^nMhtf^
Whiie, under today's rule, the owner or
operator would not be considered a
processor in these cases, the draining of
the used oU from the transformer
constitutes generation of used oil so that
the facility would be considered a use*
oUgenentac. . ; •,
toe Agency is aware that not all used
tnnsfotmer oil is drained and filtered in
the field. Instead, the oil-bearing
electrical equipment nay be transported
to a central location when th»oil is
removed, filtered, and replaced. 0*. the
used oil may be removed from the
transformers or turbines in the field and
men transported separately is a tanker
truck to a central location where it is
filtered and put back lnto*lectrical
eouipment Under today's rule, in cases
where electrical equipment containing
used oil is transported to a central
location, the transporter of the oil
bearing electrical equipment would not
be considered a used oil transporter.
However, the owner or operator would
become a generator at the point at which
the used oil U drained from the
equipment (U., at the site where the oil
is drained and filtered).
In cases where the used oil is
jpnnfflni 01*
turbines in the field and then
transported separately in a tanker truck
to a central location for filtering prior to
replacement into electrical equipment,
me owner or operator would become a
generator in the field (Le., at the point
at which the used oil to drained). The
person who then transports the used oil
would also be considered a used oil
transporter subject to the transporter
standards, m these cases, the location at
which the usedoU to filtered would be
considered a used oil transfer facility
subject to the transfer facility standards
in 5 279.45, provided mat the used oil
is stared at the site for more than 24
hours and less than 35 days. If the used
oil to filtered within 24 hours of being
drained (Le., during transport) only the
part 279 standards for used oil
transporters would apply. This filtering
activity should not raise the kind of
present at used oil processors;
essentially, the filtering to liwddmrtal to
the transportation and storage and
should not change a facility's regulatory
status. As discussed in more detail
below, today's rule provides that
transporters of used oU that to removed
frum electrical transformers and
tuibines and filtered by the transporter
or at a transfer facility prior to being
returned to the same use an not subject
to the processor orn-refiner
requirements in subpart F. In
accordance wimf279.io(e). once the
used oil has bean reclaimed to the point
when it to nady for nuse without
i as used oil
J) Separating useo* oil from
acceptable jot discharge or nuse.
Today's rule clarifies mat oil/water,.;
separation activities designed to make
reuse an not subject to the used*
processor standards. Facilities often use
oil/water separators to remove oil
(which may contain, used oil) from oil/
t
-------
Federal Register / Vol. 59. No. 43 / Friday. March 4. 1994 / Rules and Regulations 10557
water mixtures collected from the
faculty's storm sewer, process sewer,
t
tumps i
doth
Separation
hemical *n^ physical
systems use
methods to break the oil/water emulsion
and recover oil from the wastewater in
order to make the wastowater or storm
water acceptable for discharge or reuse
In compliance with local, state and
federal regulations.
This type of pretreatment of
wastowater containing oil is designed
primarily to ensure that the wastewater
meets established limits for water
discharge to streams and POTWs, and
not to produce used oil derived
products or to make used oil more
amenable for the production of used oil
derived products. This type of oil/water
separation activity is therefore not
subject to die used oil processor
standards as clarified under today's
rule. It should be noted, however, that
any used oil recovered from separator
units would be subject to the used oil
generator standards, ft is also important
to note that this provision applies only
to used oil that is generated on-site. The
provision would apply, for example, to
simple oil water separation activities
conducted (for purposes of wastewater
discharge) by a used oil processor on
wastewater which has been generated
by that processor. However, persons
who perform oil/water separation
activities on oily wastewater received
from off-site would be considered used
(C) Using oil mist collectors to remove
droplets of used oil from In-plant air to
make plant air suitable for continued
radreu/otfoii. As clarified under today's
rule, the act of removing used oil from
ambient air in the workplace is not
subject to the used oil processor
standards. At manufacturing facilities,
droplets of used oil from machining
operations an often dispersed into in-
plant air. Oil mist collectors physically
remove the small droplets of oil present
in the ambient air. This activity is not
subject to the used oil processing
standards because it is intended
primarily to make plant air suitable for
continued redrculation and not to
produce products from used oil or to
make it more amenable for the
production of used oil derived products.
However, the oil removed from oil mist
collectors is subject to the used oil
generator standards.'
(D) Removing used oil from materials
containing or otherwise contaminated
with used oil ia order to remove
excessive oil. Under $279.10(c) of the
used oil standards, materials contain!
or otherwise contaminated with used
from which the used oil has been
property drained or removed to the
extent possible such that no visible
signs of free-flowing oil remain in or on
the material are not used oil except,
when burned for energy recovery.
Today's rule clarifies that the
the used oil processor standards do not
apply to filtering of used oU prior to
burning it in a space heater, provided
that the used oil is generated on-site or
obtained from households or "do-it-
used
_or
itaminated with .used oil In order to
remove excess oil In accordance with
$ 279.1D(c) to be used oil processing.
The production of used oil derived
products is clearly not the primary
reason for removing used oil from
materials containing or contaminated
with used oil Instead, the activity is
conducted primarily to clean the
e.g.. machine tools
materials (e.g..
scrap
metal, etc) prior to reuse, recycling, or
disposal and is therefore not subject to
the used oil processing standards as
clarified by today's rule. However, in
removing the used oil from the
materials, the owner or operator
becomes a used oil generator subject to
the Subpart C used oil generator
standards.
(B) Fihermg, separating, or otherwise
reconditioning used oil before burning it
In a space heater. Under S 279.23 of the
used oil standards, used oil may be
burned in a used oil-fired space heater
under specified conditions, and
provided that the space beater bums
owner or operator
and/or used oil obtained from
ild DIY oil changers. Prior to
ngt
oil in space heaters
[ of small amounts of used
iters poses Insignificant
risks due to the small volume of used oil
burned (see SO FR 49194, Nov. 29,
1989). The Agency believes that.
because of the small volumes of used oil
involved, filtering, separating, or
otherwise reconditioning used oil that la
generated on-site prior to burning it in
a space heater would also not pose
significant risk. Therefore, although the
purpose of the filtering activity in this
case is to make the used oil more
amenable for burning, because of the
«m«H amounts of used oil being filtered
for this purpose, the Agency does not
believe that imposition of the used oil
Srocessor standards Is warranted. EPA .
therefore adding a regulatory
clarification (S 279.20(b)(2)(ii)(F}> that
F. Section £79.41— Restrictions on
burning, the used oil must often be
ftttandto remove impurities. Today's
rule clarifies that filtering of used oil for-
the purpose of removing '**"'*«"»<"«"*f
mrinr tn hiirntnp «!M \\ftfft\ ffjt in • wnmr»
neater is not considered processing of
used oil
EPA provided a regulatory exemption
from the used oil burning standards for
generators who bum used oil in on-site
space heaters (in accordance with
or re-refiners and changes to L
definition of transfer facility,
Today's rule amends S 279.41 to
provide that transporters of used oil that
is removed from oil-bearing
transformers and turbines and filtered
by a transporter or at a transfer facility
before being returned to Its original use
are not subject to the used oil processor
and re-refiner requirements. As
previously discussed, during routine
mahitenamaii of oil-bearing transformers
and turbines (or similar equipment), the
oil in the electrical equipment is
removed so that repairs/ "^ "^^ii^ic^
can be performed. In some cases, the
used ou is removed from the
transformers or turbines in the field and
then transported separately in a tanker
truck (subject to the .used oil transporter
standards) to a central location when it
is filtered and put back into electrical
equipment As discussed above, under
today's rule the filtering of the used oil
would not be considered used oil
processing provided that the filtered oil
Is reused in the same or **m1ifr manner.
And. in these eases (i A. when the used
oil is removed from the equipment and
transported to a separate location for
filtering), the location at which the oil
is filtered would be considered a
transfer facility provided that the used
oil is stored for more than 24 hours and
less than 38 days. If, as sometimes
occurs, the used oil is filtered within 24
hours of being stored at the central
location (i.e., during transport) the only
applicable standards would be the part
279 standards for used oil transporters
(La., the S 279.45 requirements for used.
oil storage at transfer facilities would
not apply).
Section
provide
279.41(c) of today's rule
onforming changes to the
used oil transportation standards to
allow transporters or transfer facilities '
to filter the used oil without being
subject to the used oil processor
•teiMi«d« it should be clearly noted,
however, that if the used oil is stored at
a site for more than 35 days, greater
environmental concerns may be present,
so the site would no longer be
considered a transfer facility and the
processor standards would apply.
ID addition. tt><« rule expands the
definition of transfer facility to allow
used oil to be held at a location (i.e.. a
transfer facility) temporarily prior to
activities that an exempt from or
-------
1659V
/ V6L 59, No. 43 / Friday.-March 4, 1904 / Rules and Regulationr
performed pursuant to the p*rt 279
standards a* a result of today**
I a transfer fccffity.
G. Section 279.46—TrocKngToday's
nil* revises the f 279.46 tracking
requirement* as they apply to rail
transporter*. Under amended 5279.46. a
signature is not required on records of
oO shipments that an exchanged
between rail tnnsporters^The Agency is
comments mbmltted by meraihoad
industfyiegafdinftthelmpnctieahiliiir
receipts when*
rafl
transporter to another. EPA iaawan that
rail can an typically transfamdrram
ona railroad company to another
without the &ca-to-bca contact that
occun in. for example, the motor carrier
industry. The Agency also recognizes
thai, uuike non-rail transporters,
railroads rely on sophisticated
electronic tracking and iBronnation.
systen* for racovdlng rail-to-nil transSar
of cargo* Owe* theaa unique
droimttanraa. andinli^it of the fact
thai 4O CTO 263.20(0 regulations fcr
haxardous waste tnnaportan do not
include aignatunnquinmento tor
intennediate sail carriers. EPA. agree*
thatthasignatiinnquinmBntoan
unduly
when applied to intannediate used oU .
niltnnsportan.EPAistben{on
revising rJia- used oil nguktioos to
eliminatotbef279.46aignatui*
requirements between intennediate nil
earners. .
H CatncOm to the Aeguftrtorj
1. RequinmenU far Eniotcement
Authority
The Agency published a comctkm
ootie* on May 3. 1993, which amended
seyeral eection* of the part 279 used oil
management standards that wen
originaUy promulgated on September
10. 1992. u the May 3. 1993. correction
notice.CPA mcorrectcy amended
regulatory §271.10. that addressed the
requirements lor States to have adequate
criminal enforcement authority for
hazardous waste. EPA ajnnnm the used oil ngulaOona. .
3. QiaiaLteilstfa. Hajaiduu* Waste
TodayarulareTi*e*S279.10(b)(2)(iii)
bydaJbfagitiiienBBtDmelisttngi
(under pan a61.aBbpaitD) of a
used oil IMtdajnaja la iniousiai T to
jappUcaMlitTof
the used oil management standards to
mixtures of used ofl and haardooa
»thatbn*todU>*ubpartD*ole)y
»of the
chancteriatia
identified m sabpart C m technical
conejcttOBV to too oaao oil management
standards pubmned OB May 3.1993, (57
FR 28420). EPA amended § 27».10(bX2)
tocoriectaoerrprin tte September 10(
1992, standards regarding how these
mixture* an regulated. At that time,
ouunmiAg CDangea anoiild navv Deett,
but wen Dot made to $279.10(bK2Xni).
As amended by today's rak.
S 279.10(bK2KUi) correctly pro
mixtures of used oil and bfizan
waste that solely ejdUbits one
ides that
tmrnmrtmnMr. urta
mixture* of need oil and hazardous
waste that is listed msubpartD solely
because it exhibits one or more subpart
C hazardous characteristics are
regulated as used oil if the mixture is of
used oil and a waste which is hazardous
solely because ft exhibits the
characteristic of ignitabiUty and the
May 3,1993. Technical
tome
to
the September 10.1992. rule. EPA is
treating the maioriry of the final used oil
management standards in the i
a* "non-HSWA" Subtitle C
requirements. The used oil management
standards ^Turnn effective on Match 8.
1993. only in those State* and
Territories that do not have ROtAbase
program autboriMtion and on Indian
State* an nquind to revise their
Subtitle C base programs to adopt the
new used oil requirements (including
those promulgated in today'* rule) by
July 1, 1994, or by July 1. 1995. if a
statutory change is necessary. See 58 PR
d 57 FR 41605.
26420 and 57
modify their
an only nquind to
i* when EPA
standards that an
stringent or broader in scope than
the existing Federal standards. Section
3009 of BCRA allow* States to impose
standard* nor* stringent than those in
the Federal program. For mose Federal
pragram change* that an less stringent
or reduce the acope of the Federal
promm. State* an not required to
modify their programs. See 40 CHt
271.1QO. Except for I
or reduce the
to f 279 J0(b) merely provide
clarltkatioB of theeodsdngnsed oil
ceaaldeied to be Use sli limniitAan the
current Federal program. Thenfon,
wim the excepttoB of the provisions
added at S270,ZO(W(2KJ),autboTized
States would not be required tonodflry
thev pioB^ajDM to aOjOpt noiiinDeQta
equivalent to or aabattntiany equivalent
to the provision listed above.
V. Executive Onler 12868
Under Executive Order 12866,58 FR
S1735 (October 4.1993} the Agency
must determine whether me regulatory
action to "significant" and therefore
subject to OMB review and the
lequinments of the Executive Order.
The Order defines "significant
regulatory action*'as one mat is likely
to result in a rule that may: (1) Have an
annual effect on the economy of $100
milUon or more or adversely affect in a
material way the economy, a sector of
the economy, productivity, competition.
Jobs, the environment, public health or
safety, or State,'local, or tribal
-------
Federal Register / Vol. 59, No. 43 / Friday, March 4, 1994 / Rules and Regulations 10559
I
(2) Create • serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken
OP pJ0jmod by another ac
(31 Materially alter the I
impact of entitlements, giants, user fees,
or loan programs or the rights and
obligations of recipient thereof; or'
(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues
Dated: Fvfcraary 25, 1994.
Carol M.
alphabetical order and the definition of
"Used oil transfer facility" is revised to
read as follows:
arising out of legal mandates, the
President's priorities, or the principles
set forth in the "Executive Order."
OMB has exempted this regulatory
action from E.0. 12868 review,
VL Paperwork Reduction Act
The reporting and recordkeeping
requirements of part 279 have been
approved by OMB and generally .
assigned the control number 2050-0124
(See 58 FR 34374 (June 25, 1993)).
which remains in effect. As today's rule
does not impose any new such
requirements, a separate information
collection request was not prepared.
VIL Regulatory Flexibility Act
Today's rule does not impose any new
regulatory requirements, and indeed.
decreases the costs of compliance for a
number of facilities. I therefore certify
that today's rule will not have a
significant impact or a substantial
number of small entities.
Vm. Administrative Procedures Act
Today's rule takes final action on
EPA's 1985 and 1991 proposals to
exempt used oil inserted into primary
refining processes from the used oil
management standards, EPA did not
address these issues in its September 10.
1992, final rule, and therefore those
proposals remained outstanding until
today's rule. Since these issues were
fully addressed in those proposals.
further public comment on today's rule
is unnecessary. The other changes being
made in today's rule either correct
errors or clarify the language contained
in the September 10. 1992 rate. No
comment is necessary on these
provisions,
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 271
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure.
Confidential business information.
Hazardous materials transportation,
Hazardous waste, Indians— lands.
Intergovernmental relations, Penalties.
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements. Water pollution control.
Water supply.
40 CFR Port 279
Petroleum, Recycling. Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements. Used oil.
For the reasons set out in the ••'
preamble, title 40, chapter 1 of the Code
of Federal Regulation* is amended as
follows:
PART 271-RECNflREMENTS FOR
AUTHORIZATION OF STATE
HAZARDOUS WASTE PROGRAMS
1. The authority citation for part 271
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C 6909. 6912(a). and
6926.
2. Section 271.16 is amended by
revising paragraph (a)(3)(ii) to read as
follows:
1271.19 nequtrementefDrentoreement
(a)'
O)'
(ii)Crii
all
idles shall be
obtainable against any person who
knowingly transports any hazardous
waste to an unpennitted facility: who
treats, stores, or disposes of hazardous
waste without a permit; who knowingly
transports, treats, stores, disposes.
recycles, causes to be transported, or
otherwise handles any used oil
regulated by EPA under section 3014 of
RCRA that is not listed or identified «
a hazardous waste under the state's
hazardous waste program in violation of
standards or regulations for
management of such used oil; or who
makes any f»l«*> statement, or
representation in any application, label.
manifest, record, report, permit or other
document -filed, maintained, or used for
purposes of program compliance
(including compliance with any
standards or regulations for used oil
regulated by EPA under section 3014 of
RCRA that is not Usted or Identified as
hazardous Waste). CHminal fiim« akall
be recoverable in at least the amount of
$10,000 per day for each violation, and
imprisonment for at least"* months
shall be available.
PART 279—STANDARDS FOR THE
MANAGEMENT OF USED OIL
3. The authority citation for part 279
continues to read as follows:
Authority: Section* 1006.2002M. 3001
through 3007.3010,3014. and 7004 of the
Solid Wast* DiiponlAct.es amended (42
U.S.C 6909,6912(a). 6921 through 6927.
6930.6934. «nd 6974): and sections 101(37)
aod 114(c) of CERCLA (42 UJS.C. 9601(37)
and 9614(c)}.
4. In S 279.1 the definition of
"Petroleum refining facility" is added in
Petroleum refining facility means an
establishment primarily engaged in
producing gasoline, kerosine, distillate
fuel oils, residual fuel oils, and
lubricants, through fnctionation,
straight distillation of crude oil,
redistillation of unfinished petroleum
derivatives, cracking or other processes
(i.e., facilities classified as SIC 2911).
Used oil transfer facility means any
transportation related facility including
loading docks, parking areas, storage
areas and other anas where shipments
of used oil are held for more than 24
hours and not longer than 35 days
during the normal course of
transportation or prior to an activity
performed pursuant to S 279.20(b)(2).
Transfer facilities that store used oil for
more than. 35 days are subject to
regulation under subpart F of this part
1279.10 [Amended]
5. Section 279.10(bKl){ii) is amended
by removing the phrase "for the cost of
$110.00."
6. Section 279.10 is amended by
revising paragraphs (b)(2)(iii) and (g) to
read as follows:
1279.10 AppHcabmty.
*****
lb)« • •
(2)* • «
(iii) Regulation as used oil under this
part, if the mixture is of used oil and a
wast* which is hazardous solely
because it exhibits the characteristic of
IgnitabiUty (e-g., ignitable-only mineral
spirits), provided that the resultant
mixture does not exhibit the
characteristic of ignitability under
$261.21 of this chapter.
(g) Used oil introduced into crude oil
pipelines at a petroleum refining
facility. (1) Used oil mixed with crude
Oil or natural gas liquids (e.g.. in a
production separator or crude oil stock
tank) for insertion into a crude oil
pipeline is exempt from the
requirements of this part The used bil
is subject to the requirements of this
part prior to the mixing of used oil with
crude oil or natural gas liquids.
(2) Mixtures of used oil and crude oil
or natural gas liquids containing less
than 1% used oil that are being stored
or transported to a crude oil pipeline or
petroleum refining facility for insertion
into the refining process at a point prior
to crude distillation or catalytic cracking
-------
10560 Faderal Eegterer / Vol. 59. No. 43 / Friday. Match 4, 1994 / Rule* and Regulation*
are exempt nn the requirements of
this put
<3J Used oU that is limited into the
L refining facility process '
tor catalytic
cracking without prior mixing with
rni**** oil v exempt «v>u the
requinmeots of ttda part provided that
the used oil constitutes less than 1% of
the crude oil feed to any petroleum
refining facility process unit at any
given time. Prior to insertion into HIS
petrokum fanning facility process, the
iiaedoU is subject to the requirements
of this part
(4) Except as provided in paragraph
(g)(S) of this section, used oU that is
introduced In*** a pel minimi refining
facility proceas altar crude distillation
or catalytic erecting la exempt from the
requirements of this part only if the
used oil meets ftvi> aperitif *Hi*" of
§279.11. Prior to insertion into the
petroleum refining facility process, the
used oil is sub)ect to the requirements
of this part.
(3) Used oil that is incidentally
captured by a hydrocarbon recovery
system or wastewater treatment system
as part of routine proceas operations at
a petroleum refining facility and
inserted into the petroleum refining .
facility process is exempt from the
requinmenta of this part. Hkis
exemption does not extend to used oil
which is iirt*ffii*i*jlly ifftstHhftii into •
hydrocarbon recovery system (e.g.. by
pouring collected used ofl tote the
wa
m).
(6) Tank bottoms from stock tanks
containing mqamytt miyhirfff ftf ||tffl| nil
and crude oil or natural gaa liquid* are
exempt uuui ibe rfftpiirMiMfifti ofthis
part.
•7. Section 279.20 is emended by
revising paragraph (b«2) to read a*
follows: . '
.,
(2)(i) Except as provided in paragraph
(bKZttii) of thi* section, generators who
process or redefine used oil must also
comply with subpartF of this part. •
(ii) Generators who perform the
following activities am not processors
provided that me used oil is generated
on-site and to not being sent off-eft* to
a burner of on- or off-specification used
oil fuel.
(A) Filtering, cleaning, or otherwise
reconditioning used oil before returning
it for reuse by the generator;
(B) Separating used oil from
wastewater generated oMite to make
the wastewater acceptable for discharge
or reuse pursuant to section 402 or
•ection307(b) of the dean Water Act or
other applicable Federal or state *
regulations governing the management
or discharge of wastewaters;
(Q Using oil mist coUectors to remove
small droplets of used oil from in-pbmt
air to make plant air suitablB for
conu&ued fttci rciiia1! IffPt
fP) Draining or otherwise removing
used oil from materials containing or
otherwise contaminated with used ofl in
ordertoi
loUtome
extent possible pursuant to f 279.10(e);
or
|B) Filtering, separating or otherwise
reconditioning used oil before burning it
in • space beater pursuant to § 279.2*.
6. Section 279.41 is i
adding paragrapb(c} to read as
dedbv
lasfollowr
• •«•••
(c) Transporter* of used oil thai la
prior to being returned to its original use
are not subject to the processor/ra-
refiner requirements m subpart F of this
part.-
1279.44 (Amended)
9. Section 279.44(c) introductory text
is amended by removing ***** phnm "for
thecostofSllo.00."
10. Section 279.46 is amended by
revising paragraphs (aH5) and (bM5) to
leadasfoUows:
f279.4«
(5) (i) Except as provided in paragraph
(a)(S)(ii) of mi* section, the signature.
dated upon receipt of the used oil. of a
representative of the generator.
transporter, or procaaaor/re*refiner who
provided me used oil for transport.
(U) Intermediate rail transporters an
not required to sign the record of
acceptance.
(S) (i) Except aa provided in paragraph
(b)(3Kii) of this section, the signature.
dated upon receipt of the used oil. of a
representative of the receiving facility or
transporter.
(ii) Intermediate y*^ transporters are
not required to sign the record of
delivery.
11. Section 279£3fc) introductory text
is amended by removing the phrase "far
thecoatofSllO-Oa."
limn (Amenoael
12. Section 279A3(c) is amended by
removing the phrase "for the coat of
-
tfiR Doc. 94-4Mft Filed S-»-M; M» am)
faciliry
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
I
Rule Title:
Checklist Title:
Reference:
Promulgation Date:
Effective Date:
Cluster:
Provision Type:
Linkage:
Optional:
Revision Checklist 131 Summary*
Recordkeeping Instructions
Record keeping Instructions; Technical Amendment
59 EB 13891 -13893
March 24, 1994
March 24, 1994
RCRA Cluster IV
Non-HSWA
None
No
Summary: This rule amends the recordkeeping instructions in Appendix I of Part 264 and
Appendix I of Part 265 so that unit of measurement codes and handling codes, used by
hazardous waste treatment, storage and disposal facilities to maintain records on-site, match
the codes used by these facilities on the Part A Permit Application Form. This technical
amendment also adds handling codes for the proper recording of those processes relating to
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces and Miscellaneous Units facilities. The Agency intends this
amendment to encourage the consistent recordkeeping and reporting of information by
hazardous waste treatment, storage and disposal facilities.
State Authorization: This rule is placed in RCRA Cluster IV; the changes addressed by it were
promulgated under non-HSWA authority. Thus, this regulation is immediately applicable only
in states that do not have final authorization for a base RCRA program. For states that are
authorized for a base program, these changes do not go into effect until States become
authorized for them. Only final authorization is available. The State modification deadline is
July 1, 1995 (or July 1,1996 if a State statutory change is necessary).
The State Revision Application must include applicable regulations, AG statement addendum.
Revision Checklist 131, other associated checklists and other application materials, i.e. a
program description and an MOA, as determined by the Regional office.
Attorney General's Statement Entry: The following entry should be placed at Subsection VII
F in the Model Revision Attorney General's Statement.
F. State statutes and regulations incorporate updates to the recordkeeping
instructions so that the codes used by hazardous waste treatment, storage and
disposal facilities to maintain records on-site match the codes used by these facilities
on the Part A Permit Application Form as indicated on Revision Checklist 131. The
new handling codes for Miscellaneous Units and Boilers and Industrial Furnaces,
addressed by Checklist 131, are also incorporated into the statutes and regulations.
Federal Authority: RCRA § § 3004 and 3005; 40 CFR 264 Appendix I, 265 Appendix
I as amended March 24, 1994 (59 FR 13891).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Enactment and Adoption
Remarks of the Attorney General
SUM131.15 -5/5/94
[Plinth: 12/21/941
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541 .OO-21
SPA 16
Revision Checklist 131 Summary (cont'd)
t
SUM 131.15 - 5/5/94
(Printed: 12/21/94)
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 131
Recordkeeping Instructions; Technical Amendment
59 FR 13891-13893
March 24, 1994
(RCRA Cluster IV, Noh-HSWA provisions)
FEDERAL REQUREftffNTS
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRH4-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
PART 264 - STANDARDS FOR OWNERS AND OPERATORS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
TREATMENT, STORAGE, AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES
APPENDIX I TO PART 264
RECORDKEEPING INSTRUCTIONS
replace Table 1 to
paragraph (2) with the
following table:
Appendix I/Table 1
t
Table 1
Unit of measure
Gallons . . . ...
Gallons per Day
Liters
Liters per Hour ...... ..
Liters per Day ... . «. •« ..
Short Tons per Hour . ... . . •
Metric Tons per Hour »
Short Tons per Day ................
Metric Tons per Day . . . . .. . . . .
Pounds per Hour ..... . . . . •...
Kilograms per Hour ................
Cubic Yards
Cubic Meters .. .. . . .
Acre- feet . . . .
Hectares . ...........
Hectare*meter ..................
Btu's per Hour
Code1
G
E '
u
L
H
V
D
u
N
s
J
R
V
c
B
A
Q
F
t
FOOTNOTE: 'single digit symbols are used here for data processing purposes.
replace Table 2 to
paragraph (3) with the
following table:
Appendix I/Table 2
March 24, 1994 - Page 1 of 7
DCL131.15 -ftevmd: 05/02/94
Print** 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 131: Record keeping Instructions;
Technical Amendment (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
FEDERAL RCHA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS: ^^
EQWV-
AlfNT
LESS
STHN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
mcaSm
IN SCOPE
Table 2.-Handling Codes for Treatment, Storage and Disposal Methods
Enter the handling code(a) listed below that most closely
represents the technique(s) used at the facility to treat, store or
dispose of each quantity of hazardous Haste received.
1. Storage
SOI
S02
$03
SO*
SOS
S06
$99
2. Treatment
Container (barrel, drun, etc.)
Tank
Waste Pile
Surface Impoundment
Drip Pad
Containment Building (Storage)
Other Storage (specify)
(a) Thermal Treatment—
T06
T07
T08
T09
T10
T11
T12
T1S
TU
T15
T18
Liquid injection incinerator
Rotary kiln incinerator
Fluidized bed incinerator
Multiple hearth incinerator
Infrared furnace incinerator
Molten salt destructor
Pyrolysis
Wet air oxidation
Calcination
Microwave discharge
Other (specify)
f
(b) Chemical Treatment--
T19
T20
T21
T22
T23
T24
T25
T26
T27
T28
T»
T30
T31
T32
T33
T34
Absorption mound
Absorption field
Chemical fixation
Chemical oxidation
Chemical precipitatic
Chemical reduction
Chlorination
Chlorinolysis
Cyanide destruction
Degradation
Detoxification
Ion exchange
Neutralization
Ozonetion
Photolysis
Other (specify)
March 24, 1994 - Page 2 of 7
DCU31.15 -RwiMd: OS/02/94
12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 131: Recordkeeping Instructions;
Technical Amendment (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
t
(c) Physical Treatment-
CD Separation of components:
T35
T36
T37
T38
T39
T40
T41
T42
T43
T44
T45
T46
T47
Centrifugarion
Clarification
Coagulation
Decanting
Encapsulation
Filtration
Flocculation
Flotation
Foaaring
Sedimentation
Thickening
Ultrafiltration
Other (specify)
(2) Removal of Specific Components:
T48
T49
T50
T51
T52
T53
T54
TS5
T56
T57
T58
T59
T60
T61
T62
T63
T64
T6S
T66
Absorption-molecular sieve
Activated carbon
Blending
Catalysis
Crystallization
Dialysis
Distillation
Electrodialysis
Electrolysis
Evaporation
High gradient Magnetic separation
Leaching
Liquid ion exchange
Liquid-liquid extraction
Reverse osmosis
Solvent recovery
Stripping
Sand filter
Other (specify)
(d) Biological Treatment
T67
T68
T69
T70
T71
T72
T73
T74
T75
T76
T77
T78
T79
Activated sludge
Aerobic lagoon
Aerobic tank
Anaerobic tank
Composting
Septic tank
Spray irrigation
Thickening filter
Tricking filter
waste stabilization pond
Other (specify)
[Reserved]
[Reserved]
March 24, 1994 • Page 3 of 7
OCL131.15
BwiMd: 05*2/94
Pnm*d: 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 131: Recordkeeping Instructions;
Technical Amendment (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
r
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STHN-
GENT
MORE
STMN-
GENT
BROAR^P
m SCOPE
(e) Boilers and Industrial Furnace*
TSO
T81
T82
T83
T84
TBS
T86
T87
T88
T89
T90
T91
T92
T93
Cf)
T94
3. Pispoul
D79
080
081
D82
D83
099
Boiltr
Cement Kiln
lime Kiln
Aggregate Kiln
Phosphate Kiln
Coke Oven
Blast Furnace
Smelting, Melting, or Refining Furnace
Titanlun Dioxide Chloride Process Oxidation Reactor
Methane Reforming Furnace
Pulping Liquor Recovery Furnace
Combustion Device Used in the Recovery of Sulfur Values from Spent
Sulfuric Acid
Halogen Acid Furnaces
Other Industrial Furnaces Listed in 40 CFR 260.10 (specify)
Other Treatment
Containment Building (Treatment)
Underground Injection
Landfill
Land Treatment
Ocean Disposal
Surface Impoundment (to be closed as a landfill)
Other Disposal (specify)
t
4. Miscellaneous (Subpart X)
X01
X02
X03
X04
X99
Open Burning/Open Detonation
Mechanical Processing
Thermal Unit
Geologic Repository
Other Subpart X (specify)
PART 265 - INTERIM STATUS STANDARDS FOR OWNERS AND OPERATORS OF
HAZARDOUS WASTE TREATMENT, STORAGE, AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES
APPENDIX I TO PART 265
RECORDKEEPING INSTRUCTIONS
replace Table 1 to
paragraph (2) with the
following table:
Appendix I/Table 1
•m
March 24, 1994 - Page 4 of 7
DCL131 15 - FWvMd 05/02/94
Prrnnd. 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 131: Recordkeeping Instructions;
Technical Amendment (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
,.•
FEDERAL RCflA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
I
Table 1
Unit of Measure
Ga 1 1 oos Per Hour
Liters Per Hour
Liters Per Day ..................
Short Tons Per Hour
Metric Tons Per Hour ...
Cubic Meters
Acre-feet
Btu's per Hour ..................
Code1
G
E
u
L
H
y
0
g
N
$
j
ft
Y
c
B
A
0
F
I
FOOTNOTE: 'Single digit symbols are used here for data processing purposes.
replace Table 2 to
paragraph (3) with the
following table:
Appendix I/Table 2
Table 2.-Handling Codes for Treatment, Storage and Disposal Methods
Enter the handling code(s) listed be low that most closely
represents the technioue(s) used at the facility to treat, store or
dispose of each quantity of hazardous waste received.
1. Storage
SOI Container (barrel, drum, etc.)
$02 Tank
$03 Waste Pile
S04 Surface IiapoundBent
SOS Drip Pad
$06 Containment Building (Storage)
$99 Other storage (specify)
2. Tree
(a) Thermal Treatment—
T06
T07
T08
T09
T10
Til
Liquid injection incinerator
Rotary kiln incinerator
Fluidized bed incinerator
Multiple hearth incinerator
Infrared furnace incinerator
Molten salt destructor
March 24, 1994 - Page 5 of 7
DCL13M5
R*vi**d: OS/02/94
Prinud: 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 131: Record keeping Instructions;
Technical Amendment (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS FEDERAL RCRA (STATION
T12 Pyrolysis
STATE ANALOG IS:
LESS MORE ^H
EQUIV. STRW- STMN- BROAoi^
ANALOGOUS STATE CITATION AUNT SENT GENT IN SCOPE
T13 Wtt Air oxidation
TU Calcination
T15 Microwave discharge
T18 Other (specify)
(b) Chemical Treatment—
T19 Absorption mound
T20 Absorption field
T21 Chemical fixation
T22 Chemical oxidation
TO ChMical precipitation
T24 Chemical reduction
T25 Chlorination
T26 Chlorinolysis
T27 Cyanide destruction
T28 Degradation
T29 Detoxification
T30 Ion exchange
T31 Neutral i tat ion
T32 Osonation
T33 Photolysis
T34 Other (specify) ^^
(c) Physical Treatment—
(1) Separation of components
T35 Centrifugal ion
T36 Clarification
T37 Coagulation
T38 Decanting
T39 Encapsulation
UO Filtration
T41 Flocculation
T42 Flotation
T43 FoMing
TU Sedimentation
T45 Thickening
T46 Ultrafiltration
T47 Other (specify)
(2) Reanval of Specific Components
T48 Absorption-molecular sieve
T49 Activated carbon
TSO giendir*
T51 Catalysis
TS2 Crystallization
T53 Dialysis
T54 Distillation
TS5 Electrodialysis
T56 ' ' Electrolysis
T57 Evaporation
. T58 High gradient
T59 Leaching
magnetic separation
T60 Liquid ion exchange
T61 Liquid- liquid
extraction
T62 Reverse osmosis
T63 Solvent recovery ^^
March 24, 1994 - Page 6 of 7
OCU31.15
PrmMd
05/02/94
12/21/9*
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO.
RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 131: Recordkeeping Instructions;
Technical Amendment (cont'd)
9541.00-21
SPA 15
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
tt
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
T64
T6S
T66
ANALOGOUS STATE CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
Stripping
Sand filter
Other (specify)
t
Cd) Biological Treatwent
T67
T68
T69
T70
T71
T72
T73
T74
T75
T76
T77
T7B
T79
Activated sludge
Aerobic lagoon
Aerobic tank
Anaerobic tank
Composting
Septic tank
Spray irrigation
Thickening filter
Tricking filter
Waste stabilization pond
Other (specify)
[Reserved!
[Reserved]
(e) Boilers and Industrial Furnaces
T80 Boiler
T81 Cement Kiln
T82 Lime Kiln
T83 Aggregate KiIn
T84 Phosphate KiIn
185 Coke Oven
T86 Blast Furnace
TB7 Smelting, Melting, or Refining Furnace
T88 Titanium Dioxide Chloride Process Oxidation Reactor
T89 Methane Reforming Furnace
T90 Pulping Liquor Recovery Furnace
T91 Combustion Device Used in the Recovery of Sulfur Values from Spent
Sulfuric Acid
T92 Halogen Acid Furnaces
T93 Other Industrial Furnaces Listed in 40 CFR 260.10 (specify)
(f) Other Treatment
T94 Containment Building (Treatment)
3. Disposal
D79 Underground Injection
D80 Landfill
081 Land Treatment
D82 Ocean Disposal
D83 Surface Impoundment (to be closed as
D99 Other Disposal (specify)
4. Miscellaneous (Subpart X)
landfill)
X01
X02
X03
X(K
X99
Open Burning/Open Detonation
Mechanical Processing
Thermal Unit
Geologic Repository
Other Subpart X (specify)
March 24, 1994 • Page 7 of 7
(XXI31.15 -Rev*** 05/02/94
Print** 12/21/94
-------
t
-------
/ Vet
131
57 •/ Thursday. March 24. 1964 / Rates and Regulations 13961
t
above (40 CFR 178-20). A copy of the
objections and/or hearing requests filed
with the Hearing Clerk should be
submitted to the OPP docket for this
The objections submitted
must specify the provisions of the
regulation deemed objectionable and the
grounds for the objections (40 CFR
178.25). Each objection must be
accompanied by the fee prescribed by
40 CFR 180.33(1). If a healing is
requested, the objections must include a
statement of the (actual issue(s) oh
which a hearing is requested, the
requestor's contentions on such issues,
and a summary of any evidence relied
upon by the objector (40 CFR 178.27). A
request for a hearing will be granted If
the Administrator determines that the
material submitted shows the following:
There is a genuine and substantial issue
of fact; there is a reasonable possibility
that available evidence identified by the
requestor would, if established, resolve
one or more of such issues in favor of
the requestor, taking into account
uncontented claims or bets to the
contrary; and resolution of the factual
issuefs) in the manner sought by the
requestor would be adequate to justify
the action requested (40 CFR 176-32).
Under Executive Order 12666 (58 PR
51735. Oct. 4. 1993), the Agency must
determine whether die regulatory action
refore subj
is "significant" and th
bject to
review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) and the requirements of
the Executive Order. Under section 3(0.
the order defines a "significant
regulatory action" as an action that is
likely to reeuh in a rule (l) having an
annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more, or adversely and
materially affecting a sector of the
economy, productivity, competition.
jobs, the environment, public health or
safety, or State. Inral, or tribal
governments or communities (also
referred to as "economically
significant"): (2) creating serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfering
with an action taken or planned by
another agency; (3) materially altering
the budgetary impacts of entitlement.
grants, user fees, or loan programs or the
rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or (4) raising novel legal or
policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President's priorities, or
the principles set forth in this Executive
Order.
Pursuant to the terms of the Executive
Order. EPA has determined that this
rule is not "significant" and to therefore
raviiew.
the Administrator has determined that
regulations establishing i
or raising tolerance level* or
(tablishii
stablishing exempt
tfa
requirements do not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. A certification
statement to this effect was published in
the Federal Register of May 4, 1081 (46
FR 24950).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part ISO
Environmental protection.
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities. Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements. .
Dated: March 14, 1994.
Douglas D.CSBB*.
DinCtOTf OfflCQ Qj PbttMCtOf rFO&BlRt'
Therefore. 40 CFR part 180 is
amended as follows:
PART 180- {AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for pert 160
continues to read as follows:
A«hec«jr. 21 U&C Mta aw) 371.
2. In S 180.428. paragraph (a) table is
amended by adding and alphabetically
inserting the raw agricultural
commodity sugarcane, to read as
follows:
atetauituron meaty;
Gociynodtty
Parti per
Sugarcane
0.05
(FR Doc. 94-MS4F1M 3-23-04; fc4>«]
40 CFR Parts 284 and 26S
(FRL-4652-0]
AQPICT! Eiivlnnniantal Protai
Agency.
ACTION: Technical i
Ufa
Regulatory Flexibility Act (Pub, L. 98-
354,94 Stat 1164. S UAC.601-612J.
tUMMAur; EPA to amending ^__
xBcordkeeping, instructions in order to
H*T*HT those unit of measurement codas
and handling codes used by hazardous
wasta.tnatment. storage and disposal
facilities to report to EPA on the Part A
Permit Application Form with the cads*
used to maintain record* on-site by
these facilities. This technical
amendment also adds additional
handling codes to allow for the proper
recording of those processes relating to
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces and
Miscellaneous Units (subpart X)
facilities. This amendment will '
encourage the consistent recordkeeping
and reporting of information by
hazardous waste treatment, storage and
disposal facilities.
EFFECTIVE DATE: March 24.1994.
ADDRESSES: All comments concerning
this technical amendment should be
addressed to Jeffrey Gaines. Assistance
Branch, Permits and State Program
Division (5303W). Office of Solid Waste.
U.S. EPA. 401M Street. SW..
Washington. DC 20460.
FOB FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Uza
Hearas, (202) 260-3393.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For
several yean, the disposal process codes
listed in Appendix I of 40 CFR parts 264
and 265 have been different from those
listed on the Port A Permit Application
form. In consultation with. State.
Regional and IleadqnsilHii personnel, it
was determined that changing the CFR
to match the forms was the appropriate
step to takv. Therefore, the Office of
Solid Waste has prepared this technical
amendment to appendix 1 of 40 CFR
parts 264 and 265 to modify those
i codes (also referred to as
j codes) listed in the CFR so that
they match those codes used OB the Pat*
A Permit Application form.
Uet of Subjects ia 40 CFR Far* 284 and
265
Hazardous waste. Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: March IS. 1994.
EUtoHP.Uwm.
Auiftant Adminlttntot. Off** of Solid IMut*
and Emergency Befpootf.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, title 40. chapter I of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended aa
follows:
PART 264—STANDARDS FOR
OWNERS AND OPERATORS OF
HAZARDOUS WASTE TREATMENT,
STORAGE AND DISPOSAL FACUJTIES
1. The authority citation Cor part 264
continues to read as follow*:
Authority: 42 UAC 690S, 6912M, 9924
and 6925.
2. Appendix I is amended by revising
Table 1 to paragraph (2) and Table 2 to
paragraph (3) to road ae follows:
-------
13892 Federal Register / VoL SB. No. 57 / Thursday. Match 24. 1994 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE i
I * -" ~4
urn 01
Galons
Galons per Hour.
Galons par Day .
Laera
LHsrs par Hour
Dam par Day.
Shaft Tons par Hour.
Metric Tons per Hour.
Short Tone per Day —.
Metric Tons per Day .
Pounds per Hour __
t per Hour _
Acre-feet.
Bars per Hour,
"Cone'
6
E
U
L
H
V
0
W
N
S
J
R
Y
C
B
A
O
f
1
T32 OzoMtkra
T33 Photolysis
T34 Ciller (specify)
(c) Physical Treatment—
(1) Separation of components:
T3* GMuirogetion
T3S aerification
T37 Coagulation
TM Decanting
«Single dtojtt symbols ere used hem for data
processing purposes,
TABLE 2.—HANOUNQ COOES FOR
TREATMENT, STORAGE AND DISPOSAL
METHODS
Enter the handling code(s) listed
below that most closely represents the
techniquefs) used at the facility to treat.
store or dispose of each quantity of
hazardous waste received.
t. Storage
SOI Container (barrel, drum, etc.)
502 Tank
503 Watte Pile
SO4 Surface Impoundment
SOS Drip Pad
SOS Containment Building (Storage)
S99 Other Storage (specify)
2. Treatment
(a) Thermal Treatment—
TOS Liquid injection incinerator
TO? Rotary kiln incinerator -
TOS Fluidized bed incinerator
TO? Multiple hearth incinerator
TlO Infrared furnace incinentor
Til Molten salt destructor
T12 Pyralysis
T13 Wet air oxidation
T14 Cakinatfon
T15 Microwave discharge
T1S Other (specify)
(b) Chemical Treatment—
T19 Absorption mound
TOO Absorption field
T21 Chemical fixation
T22 Chemical oxidation
T23 Chemical precipitation
T24 Chemical reduction
T2S Chlorination
T26 Chlorinolysis
T27 Cyanide destruction
T28 Degradation
T29 Detoxification
T30 kmi
T31 Neutralii
T40 Filtration
T41 Flocculation
T42 Flotation
T43 Foaming
T44 Sedimentation
T4S Thickening
T46 Uraefiltmtton
T47 Other (specify)
(2) Remove) of Specific Components:
T4« Absorpooo-molecttler sieve
T49 Activated carbon
TSO Blending
TSi Catalysis
T52 Crystailizaiion
TSS Dialysis
TS4 Distillation
TSS Electmdialysis
TSB Electrolysis
T57 Evaporation
TSS Highgradient!
agnetic »eptiatk>i
T59 Leaching
T60 Liquid ton exchange
Tel Liquid-liquid extiaction
TB2 Kaverae osmosla
TSS Solvent laoovary
T64 Stripping
TBS Sand filler
TB6 Other (specify)
(d) Biological Treatment
T67 Activated sludge
TM Aerobic lagoon
TM Aerobic tank
T70 Anaerobic tank
TM Comporting
T72 Septic lank
T73 Spray irrigation
T74 Thickening filter
T7S Tricking filter
T7e Wests stabiUzaDon pond
T77 Other (specify)
T78 '
T79 (Resscvsd
(a) Boiler* end Industrial Purnacae
TW Boiler
T81 Cement Kiln
T82 UmeKiln
TB3 Aggregate Kiln
TM Phosphate Kiln
TSS Coke Oven
TSB Blast Furnace
TS7 Smelting. Melting, or Refining Furnace
TSS Titanium Dioxide Chkrida Process
Oxidation Reactor
TM Methane Reforming Furnace
TM Pulping Uouor Recovery Furnace
TQ1 Combustion Device Used in the
Recovery of Sulfur Values from Spent
SulluricAdd
T«2 Halogen Acid Furnaces
TB3 Omar industtial Funacas Listed m 40
CFR 260.10 (specify)
(f) DtbsrTnatnwnt
TM Containment Building (Traatment)
D79 Underground Injection
DM LandftU
D81- Land Treatment
D82 Ocean Dispotal
DS3 Surface Impoundment (to be closed as
s landfill)
DBS Other Disposal (specify)
4. Miscellaneous (Subpatt X)
X01 Open Burning/Open Detonation
X02 lAachaiiicalProcaHing
X03 Thermal Unit
XM Geologic Raposilory
X99 Other SubpartX (specify)
PART 265-lrlTEfUM STATUS
STANDARDS TOR OWNERS AND
OPERATORS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
TREATMENT, STORAGE AND
DISPOSAL FACILITIES
1. The authority citation for part 265
continues to read as follows:
Aathsffttr 42 USC 6905.6012(e). 6924 and
6929.
2. Appendix \ is amended by revising
Table 1 to paragraph (2) and revising
Table 2 to paragraph (3) to read as
follows:
AppendixIt»Part2M Betnuikeaping
TABLE 1
(2)'
Unit of
Galons
Galons per Hour.
Galons per Day ,
Utera Per Hour
(Jaw Per Day
Short Tons Per Hour,
Metric Tons Per Hour.
Short Tone Per Day .
Metric Tons Per Day
Pounds Per Hour _
Keogmma Per Hour r
Cubic Meters
Baft per Hour
Coos'
t
O
E
U
L
H
V
D
W
N
S
J
R
C
B
A
O
F
I
_[SinaJe dgtt symbols ere used hare tar
pncessatQ purposes.
(3). • •
TABLE 2.—HANDLING COOES FOR
TREATMENT, STORAGE AND DISPOSAL
METHODS
Enter the handling code(s) listed
below that most closely represents the
techniqueW used at the facility to treat.
store or dispose of each quantity of
hazardous waste received.
-------
Federal ttagiater / Vol. 59. No. 57 /Thursday. Match 24,1984 / Rules and Regnlattons 13899
1.
SOI Container (barrel, drum, etc.)
S02 Tank
SOS Waste Pile
504 Surface Impoundment
SOS Drip Pad
SOS Containment Building (Storage)
S99 Other Storage (specify)
2. Treatment
(a) Thermal Treatment—•
TOB liquid injection incinerator
TO? Rotary kiln incinerator
TOB Fluldized bed incinerator
TO9 Multiple hearth incinerator
TlO Infrared furnace incinerator
Til Molten salt destructor
T12 Pyrolysis
T13 Wet Air oxidation
T14 Calcination
T15 Microwave discharge
TIB Other (specify)
(b) Chemical Treatment-
Tig Absorption mound
T20 Absorption field
T21 Chemical fixation
T22 Chemical oxidation
T23 Chemical precipitation
T24 Chemical reduction
T2S Chlorination
T26 Chlorinolysis
T27 Cyanide destruction
T28 Degradation
T29 Detoxification
T30 ton exchange
T31 Neutralization
T32 Ozonation
T33 Photolysis
T34 Other (specify)
(c) Physical Treatment—
(1) Separation of components
T35 Centrifugatlon
T36 Clarification
T37 Coagulation
T38 Decanting
T39 Encapsulation
T40 Filtration
T41 Flocculation
T42 Flotation
T43 Foaming
T44 Sedimentation
T45 Thickening
T46 Ultnfiltration
T47 Other (specify)
(2) Removal of Specific Components
T4B Absorption-molecular sieve
T49 Activated carbon
TSO Blending
T51 Catalysis
T52 Crystallization
T53 Dialysis
T54 Distillation
T55 Electrodialysis
TSB Electrolysis
T57 Evaporation
TSB High gradient magnetic separation
T59 Leaching
TOO Liquid ion exchange
TB1 Uquld-liquid extraction
TB2 Reverse osmosis
TBS Solvent recovery
T64 Stripping
TBS Sand filter
TB6 Other (ipedfy)
(d) Biological Treatment
TB7 Activated sludge
TBS Aerobic lagoon
T69 Aerobic tank
T70 Anaerobic lank
T71 Composting
T72 Septic tank
1*73 Sony injgiUOD
T74 Tnifik*"1'Mff filtiff
T75 Tricking filter
T76 Waste stabilisation pond
T77 Other (specify)
T78 (Reservedl
T79 IReeervedl
(e) Boilers and Industrial Furnaces
T60 Boiler
T81 Cement Kiln
T62 Lime Kiln
T83 Aggregate Kiln
TB4 Phosphate Kiln
TBS Coke Oven
T88 Blast Furnace
TB7 Smelting. Melting, or Refining Furnace
TB8 Titanium Dicodde Chloride Process
Oxidation Reector
T89 Methane Reforming Furnace
T90 Pulping Liquor Recovery Pumace
T91 Combustion Device Used In the
Recovery of Sulfur Values From Spent
SulfuricAdd
T92 Halogen Add Furnaces
T93 Other Industrial Purnaces Listed In 40
CFR 280.10 (specify)
(0 Other Treatment
T94 Containment Building CTn
sin
3. Disposal
D79 Underground Infection
DBO Landfill
D81 LandTreatment
DB2 OceanlHspoaal
063 Surface taipcuiuiiiiant (to be closed as
a landfill)
D99 Other Disposal (spedfy)
4. Miscellaneous (Subpart X)
X01 Open Burning/Open Detonation
X02 Mechanical Processing
X03 Thermal Unit
X04 Geologic Repository
X99 Other Subpart X {specify)
[PR Doc. 94-BS30 Filed 3-23-44; 845 ami
DEPARTMENT OF THE WTEMOR
43 CFR Public Land Oi*r 7034
[CO BH 4310 08, COC 1BBBB
8,1900, Which
No. 02;
ColonKlo
AGENCY: Bureau of L
Interior.
ACTION: Public Land (Mar.
SUMMARY: This order revokes a
Secretarial order insofar at it affects
735.45 acres of National Forest System
lands withdrawn for. the Bureau of Land
Management's Powersite Reserve No.
82. The Forest Service has requested
this action to allow for disposal of the
lands. These lands an no longer needed
for waterpower purposes. The lands
have been open to miming under the
provisions of the Mining Claims Rights
Restoration Act of 1955, and these
>visions are no longer required. The
ids have been and will remain open
to mineral leasing.
EFFECTIVE DATE: April 25.1994.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alexa Watson, BLM Colorado State
Office, 2850 Youngfield Street.
Ukewood. Colorado 80215-7076,303-
239-3796.
By virtue of the authority vested in
the Secretary of the Interior by Section
204 of the Federal Land Policy and
Management Act of 1976.43 U.S.C.
1714 (1988), it is ordered as follows:
1. Secretarial Order dated December
8.1909, which established Powersite
Reserve No. 62, is hereby revoked
insofar as it affects the following
described lands:
SlwlL Principal Meridiaji i
Anpaho National Forest
T.4S..R.73W..
Sec. 2, lots 1.2.3.4. S, 11. and 12;
Sec. 9. lota B to IB, inclusive;
Sec. 4. lots 9,10. IS, and 16.
The areas described aggregate 735.49 acres
of National Forest System lands in Clear
Creek County.
2. At 9:00 a.m. on April 25,1994, the
lands described in paragraph 1 will be
open to such forms of disposition as
may by law be made of National Forest
System lands, subject to valid mdiitinfl
rights, the provisions of existing
withdrawals, and the requirements of
applicable taw.
The lands have been open to mining
under the provisions of the Mining
Claims Rights Restoration Act of 19SS.
30 U.S.C. 621 (1988). and these
provisions are no longer required.
Dated: March 14,1994.
Assistant Secretary of the Interior.
[PR Doc. 94-6984 Filed 3-23-04; 8:45 ami
-------
t
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
Revision Checklist 132 Summary'
I
Rule Title:
Checklist Title:
Reference:
Promulgation Date:
Effective Date:
Cluster:
Provision Type:
Linkage:
Optional:
Hazardous Waste Management System: Identification and
Listing of Hazardous Wastes; Wastes from Wood Surface
Protection; Correction
Wood Surface Protection; Correction
59 FR 28484
June 2, 1994
June 2, 1994
RCRA Cluster IV
Non-HSWA
Revision Checklist 128
No
Summary: This notice corrects inaccurate references to EPA Publication SW-846 in the final
rule published January 4, 1994 (59 FR 458; Revision Checklist 128).
State Authorization: This rule is placed in RCRA Cluster IV. The State modification deadline
is July 1, 1995 (or July 1, 1996 if a State statutory change is necessary). This rule was
promulgated under non-HSWA authority and the changes do not go into effect until States
become authorized for them. Only final authorization is available.
The State Revision Application must include applicable regulations, AG statement addendum.
Revision Checklist 132, other associated checklists and other application materials, i.e. a
program description and an MO A, as determined by the Regional office.
Attorney General's Statement Entry: The entry at Subsection I CC in the Model Revision
Attorney General's Statement should be replaced with the following revised entry:
CC. State statutes and regulations incorporation by reference "Test Methods
for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods," EPA Publication SW-846, the
Third Edition (November 1986), as amended by Updates I, II and IIA, as indicated in
Revision Checklists 128 and 132.
Federal Authority: RCRA § §2002(a), 3001 (b), and 3001 (e)(1); 40 CFR 260.11 (a) as
amended January 4, 1994 (59 FR 458) and June 2, 1994 (59 FR 28484).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Enactment and Adoption
Remarks of the Attorney General
DSUM132.15 -7/OW94
IPlinMd: 12/21/941
-------
f
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 132
Wood Surface Protection; Correction
59 EB 28484
June 2, 1994
(RCRA Cluster IV, Non-HSWA provisions)
•4
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
t
PART 260 - HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM: GENERAL
SUBPART B - DEFINITIONS
REFERENCES
after the first
"Updates 1" remove
", II"; remove the "s"
in the second
"Updates 1" as well as
"II, and HA", which
occurs immediately
after; add new
information on where
Update II A may be
found;
260. 11 (a)
June 2, 1994 - Page 1 of 1
DCL132.15 - R*viMd: 07/01/94
Print**. 12/21/9*
-------
t
-------
28484
C.L-1321
Federal Register / Vol. 59. No. 105 / Thursday. June 2, 1994 / Rules and Regulations
t
new fee schedule will be published in
the Federal Register as a Final Rule to
become effective 30 days of more after
publication, as specified in the rule.
When changes are made based on
periodic reviews, the changes will be ••'
subject to public comment.
IFR Doc. 94-13431 Filed 6-1-94; 8:45 ami
BIUJMC ODD! 1MB » F
40 CFR Part 260
[FM.-48M-7]
Hazardous Waste Management
System; WentlflcaHon and listing of
Hazardous Wastes; Waste* From
Wood Surface Protection; Correction
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION; Final rule; correction.
SUMMARY: This notice contains
corrections to the final regulation (FRL-
4804-9) which was published Tuesday.
January 4,1994 ("Hazardous Waste
Management System: Identification and
Listing of Hazardous Wastes; Wastes
from Wood Surface Protection; Final
Rule". 59 FR 458). This notice corrects
inaccurate references in that Final Rule
to the EPA Publication SW-846, 'Test
Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste.
Physical/Chemical Methods".
EFFECTIVE DATE: June 2.1994.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kim
Kirkland at (202) 260-4761. Office of
Solid Waste (Mailcode 5304), U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 401
M Street. SW.. Washington. DC 20460.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The final regulation that is the subject
of this correction (January 4.1994.59
FR 458) amended the hazardous waste
regulations by adding the sodium and
potassium salts of pentachlorophenol
and tetrachlorophenol to appendix VUJ
of 40 CFR part 261. The final regulations
also amended EPA Publication SW-846.
"Test Methods for Evaluating Solid
Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods," by
adding Method 4010 to the Third
Edition of SW-846 as Update DA. SW-
846 contains the analytical and test
methods that EPA has evaluated and
found to be among those acceptable for
testing under Subtitle C of the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976
(RCRA). as amended. The Agency added
Method 4010 to SW-446 as an .
appropriate method, in general, for
testing for the presence of the sodium
and potassium salts of
pentachlorophenol and
letrachlorophenol which, as noted
above, were added by the final rule to
appendix Vm of 40 CFR part 261.
In the final regulation of January 4. ..
1994 (59 FR 458). the Agency amended
40 CFR 260.11(a) to Incorporate by
reference both Update HA (Method
4010) and Update D of SW-646; and to
indicate that these updates are available
from the U.S. Government Printing
Office (GPO). These amendments to 40
CFR 260.11 contain two technical
errors: (1) Update D of SW-846 is still
being developed by EPA and was not
promulgated by the final regulations of
January 4.1994, or by any other
regulation to date, and is not available
from GPO: and (2) Update HA (Method
4010). although promulgated by the
January 4.1994 rule, is also not
available from the GPO.
Need for Correction
As published, the final regulations of
January 4,1994 were in advertent error
with respect to the incorporation by
reference of Update U of SW-846. Third
Edition, into the hazardous waste
regulations at 40 CFR 260.11(a). The
regulations were also in inadvertent
error with respect to the availability of
Updates 0 and DA from the U.S.'
Government Printing Office. These
errors, therefore, need correction.
Because this action is a technical
correction, prior notice and opportunity
for comment is unnecessary, and good
cause exists for this change to take effect
immediately (see 5 U.S.C. 553(6)).
Accordingly, the Agency is not seeking
any comments based on today's notice.
Correction of Publication
Accordingly, the publication on
January 4.1994 of the final regulation.*
59 FR 458. "Hazardous Waste
Management System; Identification and
Listing of Hazardous Wastes; Wastes
from Wood Surface Protection; Final
Rule" (FRL-4804-9). which was the -
subject of FR Doc. 93-32032. is - .
corrected. Specifically, on page 468. in
the third column. $ 260.11U) is
corrected to read as follows:
J260.11 Reference* [corrected].
(a)-*
"Test Methods for Evaluating Solid
Waste. PhysicaVChemlcal Methods."
EPA Publication SW-846 [Third Edition
(November. I960), as amended by
Updates I and HA|. The Third Edition of
SW-B46 and Update I (document
number 955-001-00000-1) are available
from the Superintendent of Documents.
U.S. Government Printing Office.
Washington. DC 20402. (202) 783-3238;
and Update HA is available from the
Office of Solid Waste (Mailcode 5304);
U.S. EPA. 401M Street. SW.. '
Washington. DC 20460 or by calling the
Methods Information Communication
Exchange (MICE) Service at (703) 821-
4789. Copies may be inspected at the
Library. U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency. 401 M_Street. SW.. Washington.
DC 20460.
*****
Dated: May 17,1994.
Elliott P. Uw*.
Assistant Administrator.
IFR Doc 94-13190 Filed 6-1-94; 8:45 ami
FEDERAL EMERGENCY
MANAGEMENT AGENCY
44 CFR Pert 65
Changes In Flood Elevation
ninattons
AGENCY: Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA).
ACTION; Final rule.
SUMMARY: Modified base (100-year)
flood elevations are finalized for the
communities listed below. These
modified elevations will be used to
calculate flood insurance premium rates
for new buildings and their contents.
EFFECTIVE DATES: The effective dates for
these modified base (100-year) flood
elevations an indicated on the .
following table and revise the Flood
Insurance Rate Map(s) in effect for each
listed community prior to this date.
ADDRESSES: The modified base flood
elevations for each community are
available for inspection at the office of
the Chief Executive Officer of each
community. The respective addresses
are listed In the following table.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael K. Buckley. P.E., Chief. Hazard
Identification Branch. Mitigation
Directorate, 500 C Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20472. (202) 646-2756.
SUPPLEMENTARY MFORMATON: The
Federal Emergency Management Agency
makes the final determinations listed
below of the final determinations of
modified base (100-year) flood
elevations for each community listed.
These modified elevations have been
published in newspapers of local
circulation and ninety (90) days have
elapsed since that publication. The
Associate Director has resolved any
appeals resulting from this notification.
The modified base (100-year) flood
elevations are not listed for each
community in this notice, i Sowever. this
rule includes the ad&uss of th-j Chief
Executive Officer of the ccir.niunity
where the modified base Itoo-vesr)
-------
I
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
t
Rule Title:
Checklist Title:
Reference:
Promulgation Date:
Effective Date:
Cluster:
Provision Type:
Linkage:
Optional:
Revision Checklist 133 Summary''
Standards Applicable to Owners and Operators of Hazardous
Waste Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities, Underground
Storage Tanks, and Underground Injection Control Systems;
Financial Assurance; Letter of Credit
Letter of Credit Revision
59 EB 29958-29960
June 10, 1994
August 9, 1994
RCRA IV
Non-HSWA
None
Yes
Summary: This rule amends regulations at 264.151 (d) and (k) which cite the "Uniform
Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits," published by the International Chamber of
Commerce, by inserting the phrase "and copyrighted." Without this insert, it is not clear from
the regulations that the International Chamber of Commerce publication is copyrighted
material. Regulations associated with the UIC, UST and RCRA programs are affected. Only
the change to the RCRA regulations are addressed by this checklist.
State Authorization: This rule is placed in RCRA Cluster IV. The State modification deadline
is July 1,1995 (or July 1,1996 if a State statutory change is necessary). This checklist has
been designated as optional because it only revises the description of International Chamber
of Commerce document and does not impose new duties on owners or operators that choose
to rely on letters of credit. However, EPA encourages States to adopt this change, tn states
that are not yet authorized for RCRA, new letter of credit instruments will have to include this
new language.
The State Revision Application must include applicable regulations, AG statement addendum.
Revision Checklist 133, other associated checklists and other application materials, i.e. a
program description and an MOA, as determined by the Regional office.
Attorney General's Statement Entry: The following entry should be placed at Subsection XV
U in the Model Revision Attorney General's Statement.
U. [OPTIONAL: This is a reduced requirement.] State statutes and
regulations indicate that the "Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary
Credits" is a copyrighted document of the International Chamber of Commerce
as indicated in Revision Checklist 133.
Federal Authority: RCRA 2002{a), 3004,3005, and 3006; 40 CFR 264.151 (d)
& (k) as amended June 10, 1994 (59 FR 29958).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Enactment and Adoption
Remarks of the Attorney General
DSUM133.1 S- 7/7/94
(PlinMd: 12/21/94)
-------
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 133
Letter of Credit Revision
59 EB 29958-29960
June 10, 1994
{RCRA Cluster VI, non-HSWA provisions)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
PART 264 - STANDARDS FOR OWNERS AND OPERATORS OF
HAZARDOUS WASTE TREATMENT, STORAGE AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES
SUBPART H - FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS
WORDING OF THE INSTRUMENTS
I
t after "published" insert
"and copyrighted"
t after "published" insert
"and copyrighted"
264.1 51 (d)
264.1 51 (k)
June 10, 1994-Page 1 of 1
OCL133.15 - RmiMd: 07107194
A. 12/21/94
-------
t
-------
2*958 Federal
/ Vol. S9, No. Ill / Friday. June 10. 1994 / Rules and Regulations
I
Statistical Ana (CMSAfc the Baltimore
Oxygenate Gasoline Control Area—
compriied of Baltimore Oty and tbe
oouotiM of Anne ArundeL Baltiraore,
Carroll. Harford. Howard, md Quean
Anne's. aD of which am Included in the
Baltimore Metropolitan Statistical Area
(MSA); and the Washington Oxygenated
Gasoline Control Area comprised of
the counties of Calvert. Charles.
Frederick. Montgomery, and Prince
George's, which comprise the Maryland
• portion of the Washington. DC MSA.
The intended effect of this action is to
approve these regulations to satisfy the
requirements of the Clean Air Act as
amended by the Clean Air Act
Amendments of 1990 (the Act). This
action is being tahm under section 110
of the Clean Air Act.
EFFECTIVE DATE: This^nal rule will
become effective on July 11,1994.
ADDRESSES: Copies of die documents
relevant to this action are available for
public inspection during normal
business hours at the Air, Radiation,
and Toxics Division. U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency. .
Region ID. 841 Chestnut Building.
Philadelphia. Pennsylvania 19107; Air
and Radiation Docket (6102), U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 401
M Street. SW, Washington. DC 20460;
and the Maryland Department of the
Environment. 2508 Broening Highway.
Baltimore. Maryland 21224. -
PON FURTHER *rORIi*TIOH CONTACT:
Catherinel. Magliocchetti. (215) 597-
6863 at the EPA address indicated in die
ADDRESSES section.
SUPPLEMENTARY JtfORMATIOR: On
December 14,1993, (56 FR 65309), BPA
published a notice of proposed
rulemaldng (NPR) for the Stow of . ....
Maryland. The NPR proposed approval
of an Oxygenated «••«««• Program in
the State of Maryland. A formal SIP -'
revision was submitted by the State of
Maryland on November 13,1992.
Specific requirements of the
Oxygenated Gasoline Program and the
rationale la EPA's proposed action an
explained in the NPR end will not be
restated here. No comments were
received on die NPR..
Final Action
EPA is approving the SD? revision
submitted by the State of Maryland on
November 13.1992, which implements
an Oxygenated GasoHne Program in the
State. Tbe SIP revision CTBffrrt* of
revisions to Code of Maryland
Regulations (COMAR) 03.03.05. and
COMAR 26.11.13 and new regulations
codified at COMAR 03.03.06 and
COMAR 26.11.20. Nothing in this action
should be construed as permitting or
allowing or establishing a precedent for
any future request lor revision to any
• 'state implementation plan. Each request
for revision to the state implementation
plan shall be considered separately in
light of specific technical, economic.
and environmental factors and in
relation to relevant statutory and
regulatory requirements.
This action was originally classified
as a Table 2 action for signature by tbe
Acting Regional Administrator under
the procedures published in the Federal
Register on January 19,1989 (54 PR
2214-2225). However, in an October 4,
1993 memorandum, the Acting
Assistant Administrator for Air and
Radiation. Michael H. Shapiro, revised
these SIP tables so that Table 2 final
actions on which no adverse comments
were received on the proposed rule may
be delegated to Table 3 actions. No
comments were received concerning
this action; therefore, under the new
guidelines, this final action may be
classified as a Table 3 action. On
January 6.1989, tbe Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) waived
Table 2 and Table 3 SIP revisions from
the requirements of section 3 of
Executive Order 12291 fora period of
two years. The USEPA has submitted a
request far a permanent waiver for Table
2 and 3 SIP revisions. The OMB has
agreed to «nnrin»m the waiver nntfl such
time as it rules on USEPA's request
This request is still applicable under
Executive Order 12866. which
superseded Executive Order 12291 on
September 30.1993.
Under section 307(b)(l) of the dean
Air Act. petitions far Judicial review of
this action to approve Maryland's
Oxygenated Gasoline Progtanunust be
filed in the United States Court of
Appeals for the appropriatedrcuit by
August 9,1994. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by tbe Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the-finality
of this rule for the purposes of juditisl
review nor does it extend the time
within which a petition for Judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2) of the Clean Air Act)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR part 52 .
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control. Carbon monoxide,;
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations. Reporting
and recordkeeping nqv
Dated: May », l«M.
Acting Regional Administrator. Region W.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART52— {AKBHIDE0J
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
AuUMrttr: 42 U.S.C. 740I-7671q.
2. Section 52.1070 is amended by
adding paragraph (c)(101) and by •
removing and reserving paragraph
(cX88) to read as follows:
152.1010
ofntan.
(101) Revisions to the State of
Maryland Regulations Oxygenated
Gasoline Program regulations submitted
on November 13,1992 by the Maryland
Department of the Environment
Effective date October 26,1992.
(if inooi pontwo by iGiEmico*
{A) Letter of November 13.1992 from
the Maryland Department of the
Environment transmitting Oxygenated
Gasoline Prognm rendations.
(B
egi
The
of Maryland
efiwcttveOctober 26.1992:
toCOMAR
U)
26.11.1X01 (Control of Gasoline and
Volatile Organic Compound Storage and
Handting).
U) Deletion of Regulation .06 under
COMAR 26.11.13 {Control of GesoBne
and Volatile Organic Compound Storage
andHandling).
(3) New Regulation COMAR
26.11.20.03 (Mobile Sources).
(4) COMAR 0343.05.01. .01-1. .02-1.
.05. J06, and .15 (Motor Fuel
(5) COMAR 03434)6.61
(Ktni««ifiTi« Control Cbmnlianc*
.06
November
(ii) The remainder of t
13, 1992 tnbmrtt%li
p« Doc. B4-J4071 Filed «-»-«4;S:4Sein)
40 CFR Parts 144,264, and 280
fFRL-4S94-3}
OpsisliMS of HsunJous Wssts
•MO UMMfQfMlfMl feefMSttQffl GQflOOl
Systems; Ftnsmtt Assurance; Utt
AOEHCT: Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Final rule; amendment •
-------
Federal Register / Vol. 59. No. Ill / Friday, June 10, 1994 / Rules andttegulatioos Z8953
SUMMARY: EPA is amending the
regulations related to financial
assurance promulgated under Subtitles
• C and I of the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA). Those
regulations cite the "Uniform Customs ,
and Practice for Documentary Credits."
published by the International Chamber
of Commerce. This notice inserts the
words "and copyrighted" into the letter
of credit instrument to clarify that the
International Chamber of Commerce
publication is copyrighted material. As
a result of this notice, owners and
operators using the letter of credit
instrument to demonstrate financial
assurance must include this additional
language.
EFFECTIVE DATE: August 9.1994.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tom Gorman at (202) 260-1339, Office
of General Counsel. U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency. 401M St. SW..
Washington. DC 20460.
SUPPLEMENTARY WFORMATION:
I. Authority
This amendment is promulgated
under the authority of Sections 2002{a).
3004.3005. and 3006 of the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act. as
amended. 42 U.S.C. 6912.6924.6925.
6926. and 6991. and under the authority
of the Safe Drinking Water Act. 42
U.S.C. 300f et sea.
Owners and operators of hazardous
waste treatment, storage, and disposal
facilities must demonstrate financial
assurance for costs of closure, post-
closure can. third-party liability and
corrective action associated with their
facilities, in subpart H of 40 CFR part
264. the Agency has established -
regulations regarding financial
assurance for closure, post-closure care.
and third party liability. Section
264.151 provides wording for the
various financial instruments that
owners and operators may use to.
demonstrate financial assurance. .
Section 264.1Sl(d) provides wording for
a letter of credit to damonsttate
financial assurance fbrdosun and post-
closure care, and $ 264.15l(k) provides
wording for a letter of credit to
demonstrate Bi»«n«^i«| assurance for
The RCRA regulations in 40 CFR part
280 impose similar requirements on
owners and operators of underground .
storage tanks. Under those provisions.
owners and operators of underground
storage tanks must demonstrate
financial assurance for taking corrective
action and for third party liability. The
regulations then establish a series of
mechanisms that owners and operators
can use. Section 280.99 provides the
wording for a letter of credit, which is
one of those allowable mechanisms.
Finally, the regulations at 40 CFR part
144. subpart F for the Underground
Infection Control Program contain
specific requirements for financial
responsibility for Class I hazardous
waste injection wells. Class I wells
inject industrial and municipal wastes.
including RCRA hazardous wastes.
below the lowermost underground
source of drinking water (USDW). 40
CFR part 144. subpart F, is directly
applicable to owners add operators of
all Class I hazardous waste injection
wells.
m. Purpose of This Notice
The wording of the letter of credit
instrument in §S 144.70(d), 264.151 (d)
and (k). and § 280.99 includes a
reference to the "Uniform Customs and
Practice for Documentary Credits,"
published by the International Chamber
of Commerce. However, the language
does not make it clear that the
it fJ»«mhnf of fV>mm«>iif*»
publication is copyrighted material.
This correction notice amends the
letter of credit instrument in
$$ I44.70(d), 264.151 (d) and (k). and
280.99 to clarify that the International
Chamber of Commerce publication is
copyrighted material by including the
words "and copyrighted" in the
wording of the letter of credit
instrument As • result of this change to
the regulations, owners and operators
V. Administrative Procedures Act
Requirements
Under 5 U.S.C S53(b)(3)(B). a rule is
exempt from notice and public
comment requirements "when the
agency for good cause finds (and
incorporates the finding and a brief
statement of masons therefore in the
rules issues) that notice and public
procedures thereon are impractical.
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest." EPA believes that comment is
unnecessary because this amendment
makes only a change in the wording of
the letter of credit instrument, but does
not change the requirements for using
the letter of credit instrument to
demonstrate financial assurance.
Therefore. EPA believes there is good
cause to make today's rule effective on
August9,1994.
List of Subjects .
40 CFR Part 244
Environmental protection.
Administrative practice and procedure.
Confidential Business. Information.
Hazardous waste, Indian—lands.
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements. Surety bonds. Water
supply.
40 CFR Part 264
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control. Hazardous waste.
Insurance, Packaging and containers.
Reporting and
who obtain a letter of credit to
demonstrate flrw^m assurance must -
use the revised language in $ 264.151 (d),
264.151(k). or 280.99(b). which includes
the words "and copyrighted."
IV. Effect OB Stale Authority To
Administer Federal Programs
Since this amendment only revises.
the description of the document, and
does not impose new duties on owners
or operators that choose to rely OB
letters of credit EPA will not require
states to adopt this change as part of -
their approved UIC and UST programs
or authorized^RCRA programs.
Therefore, owners and operators in
authorized states ft*%* do not adopt this
change will not be affected by this rule.
However. EPA encourages states to
adopt this change.
In states that adopt this change and in
states without approved UIC or UST
programs or states not authorized'for the
RCRA program, new letter of credit
instruments will have to include this
new language.
rping
requirements. Security measures. Surety
I
40 CFR Part 280
Environmental protection. Hazardous
substances. Insurance, Oil pollution.
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements. Surety bonds. Water
pollution control. Water supply.
Dated: April 1S.J994.
EffiettLawfc- ',
AftittontAdminiftmtor.Offic* of Solid Wai.lt
Dated: April 25. 1994.
AaitiantAdialaiftTalor. OfficKif Water.
PART 144-UNDEROROUND
INJECTION CONTROL PROGRAM
1. The authority citation for part 144
continues to read as follows;
Aatkerilv: Sate Drinking Water Act. 42
U.S.C 3001 et *Bq.; ReMUtotConMrvanoB
and Recovery Act. 42 U.S.C. 6901 rt teq.
2. In §144.70, the last sentence in
paragraph (d) is revised to read as
f 144.70 Wwdtog of 0tt Instruments.
-------
Pastes! Begistej / Vol. ^9, No. Ill / Friday, June 10. 1994 / Rules aid Regulation*
t
«*V » *Hus credit is subject to
(ioMrt "tin most recent edition of the
Uniform Customs and Practice for
Documentary OwUta. published ud
copyrighted by the International
Chamber of Commerce," or "the
Uniform Commercial Code"].
PART 2*4—STANDARDS FOR
OWNERS AND OPERATORS OF
HAZARDOUS WASTE TREATMENT,
STORAGE, AND DISPOSAL
FACILITIES
1. The authority citation for part 264
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C 6905,6912M. 6924.
•ad 6925.
2. In S 2B4.15irthe last sentence in
paragraphs (d) and (k) is revised to read
as follows:
f 2M.1S1 wonting of the Instrument*.
(d)* * 'This credit is subject to
(insert "the most recent edition of the
Uniform Customs and Practice for
Documentary Credits, published and
copyrighted by the International
Chamber of Commerce," or "the
Uniform Commercial Code").
(k)* * •This credit is subject to
[insert "the most recent edition of the
Uniform Custom* and Practice for
Documentary Credits, published and
copyrighted by the International
Chamber of Commerce," or "the
Uniform Commercial Code").
PART 280—TECHMCAL STANDARDS
AMD-CORRECTIVE ACTION
REQUIREMENTS FOR OWNERS AND
OPERATORS OF UNDERGROUND
STORAGE TANKS (UST)
1. The authority citation for part 200
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6912,6991,699la,
6991b, 6991C. 6991d. 69916.689lf. and
6991h.
2. In § 2*0.99. the last sentence of
paragraph (b) is revised to read as
follows:
$28099 LemrotcfWK.
(b)* * 'This credit is subject to
(insert "the most recent edition of the
Uniform Customs and Practice for
Documentary Credits, published and
copyrighted by the International •
dumber of Commerce," or "the
Uniform Commercial Code").
IFR Doc. 94-14171 Filed 6-9-94; 8:45 am)
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION .
48 CFR Parts 1801, 1802. 1804, 1805,
1807. 1809, 1815, 1822, 1823. 1825,
1839, Mid 18S2
(NASA FAR Supplement Directive 8B-1SJ
Acquisition Regulation; Miscellaneous
Amendments to NASA FAR
Supptansnt
AGENCY: Office of Procurement.
Procurement Policy Division. National
Aeronautics and Space Administration
(NASA).
ACTION: Final rule. _
SUMMARY: This document amends the
NASA Federal Acquisition Regulation
Supplement (NFS) to reflect a number of
miscellaneous changes dealing with
NASA internal or administrativ
matters, such as radesignation of NASA
offices and delegation of authority
within NASA.
EFFECTIVE DATE: June 30,1994.
FOR FURTHER MFORMATIOH CONTACT:
Mr. David K. Beck, (202) 358-O482.
SUPPLEMENTARY MFORUATKJN:
Availability of NASA FAR Sapptemeat
The NASA FAR Supplement, of
which this rule is a part, is available in
its entirety on a subscription basis from
the Superintendent of Documents,
Government Printing Office,
Washington. DC 20402, telephone
number (202) 783-3238. Gte GTO
Subscription Stock Number 933-003-
00000-1. It is not distributed to the *
public, either in whole or in part.
directly by NASA.
Dryden Flight Research Center and
Space Station Program Office
The following sections an changed as
a result of the establishment of the
Dryden Flight Research Center and
Space Station Program Office: 1802.101,
1804.7102-4(a). 1804.7103-2.1805.207,
1805.303-71 (bNl). 1807.7l02(b).
1815.807-71.1822.103-4.1839.7003-5.
and 1852.103.
Waiver of Certified Cost and Price Data
for Canadian Commercial Corporaties)
An existing waiver in 1815.804 ia
extended. Subpangraph 1815.604-
3(eH4) is removed. It required NASA
personnel to report me of the waiver to
,NASA Hesdmiartsis.
DeJegatioa of Authority far Small
Changes to 1825.7003 and 1825.7004
delegate authority and describe internal
procedures within NASA.
Reversion of Domestic Preference to
Buy Asnericsn Act
Subpart 1625.71 and clauses at
1852.225-74 and 1852-225-75 an
removed because an appropriation act
requirement for domestic preference
was not extended beyond Fiscal Year
1991 funding. The domestic preference
required by the Buy American Act. as
implemented in (FAR) 48 CFR Subpsrts
25.1 and 25.2 and (NASA FAR
Supplement) 48 CFR Subparts 1825.1
and 1825.2. remains in effect.
Additional Changes
Section 1815.80S-5(b) is revised in
order to complete an incomplete
sentence. Section 18l5.970-3(b) is
revised ID older to uuiisil a cross*
reference. A reference is corrected in
1822.870 regarding contractor EEO
reports. A reference to Code FO is
changed to Code UO and the division
title is changed (section 1823.7002(c)).
Section 1852.209-71 is revised in order
to correct two cross-references. In
addition, section references and subpart
luMMHnyi ire revised to reflect
co-responding changes In the Federal
Acquisition Regulation.
NASA certifies that this regulation
will not have a significant economic
effect on s substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C 601 st sso.).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 1801,
1802. 1804, 1805. 1607. 1809, 1815,
1822, 1823, 1825, 1838, and 1852
\jov9r
in
TeaiUMdtk*.
Deputy Attoctot* Administrator for
Procunatmt.
Accordingly, 48 CFR parts 1801, 1802,
1804. 1805, 1807, 1809, 1815, 1822.
1823, 1825.4839, and 1852 are
amended as follows,
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
parts 1601. 1802. 1804, 1805. 1807.
1809. 1815. 1822. 1823, 1625, 1839. and
1852 continues to read as follows:
Attmvtty: 42 VAC. !473fcKU
-------
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
Revision Checklist 134 Summary'
I
Rule Title:
Checklist Title:
Reference:
Promulgation Date:
Effective Date:
Cluster:
Provision Type:
Linkage:
Optional:
Hazardous Waste Management System; Correction of Listing of
P015-Beryllium Powder
Correction of Beryllium Powder (P015) Listing
59 £B 31551-31552
June 20, 1994
June 20, 1994
RCRA Cluster IV
Non-HSWA
None
No
Summary: On April 22,1988, EPA published a technical correction to the lists of hazardous
wastes in 40 CFR 261.33(e) and (f) (Revision Checklist 46, 53 fjj 13382). In that notice, the
word "dust" was inadvertently omitted from the P015 listing for "beryllium dust" in the
261.33(e) list of hazardous wastes. In addition, the sole manufacturer of this commercial
chemical product has since indicated that the term "beryllium dust" is not used by the
industry to describe this commercial chemical product; the actual term used by the industry
is "beryllium powder". This technical correction, thus, adds "powder" to the P015 hazardous
waste listing for "beryllium* and makes conforming changes to the list of hazardous
constituents in Part 261 Appendix VIII and to Table 2 in § 268.42(a). Conforming changes
were also made to the CERCLA list of hazardous substances, although only the changes to
the RCRA regulations are addressed by this checklist.
State Authorization: This rule is placed in RCRA Cluster IV. The State modification deadline
is July 1,1995 (or July 1,1996 if a State statutory change is necessary). These changes do
not go into effect until States become authorized for them because this rule was promulgated
under pre-HSWA authorities. Only final authorization is available.
The State Revision Application must include applicable regulations, AG statement addendum.
Revision Checklist 134, other associated checklists and other application materials, i.e., a
program description and an MO A, as determined by the Regional office.
Attorney General's Statement Entry: Subsection I A(28) in the Model Revision Attorney
General's Statement should be added to read as follows:
(28) Listing of Beryllium (P015) is amended to read "Beryllium
powder," 40 CFR 261.33 and Part 261 Appendix VIII, as
amended June 20,1994 [59 FR 315511, Revision Checklist 134.
The following new entry should be placed at Subsection XXIP in the Model Revision Attorney
General's Statement.
DSUM134.15 - 12/21/94
|Phnt»d: 12/21/941
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
Revision Checklist 134 Summary (cont'd)
P. State statutes and regulations include a revision to P015 listing
in the land disposal restrictions technology-based treatment standards as
indicated on Revision Checklist 134.
Federal Authority: RCRA 53004(d)-(k) and (m); 40 CFR 268.42(a)/Table 2, as
amended June 20, 1994 (59 £R 31551).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Enactment and Adoption
Remarks of the Attorney General
t
DSUM134.15 - 12/21/94
(Printed: 12/21/94!
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 134
t
Correction of Beryllium Powder (PC 15) Listing
59 £B 31551 -31552
June 20, 1994
(RCRA Cluster IV, Non-HSWA provisions)
Note: On April 22, 1988, EPA published a technical correction to the lists of hazardous wastes in
40 CFR 261.33(6) and (f) (Revision Checklist 46, 53 FR 13382). In that notice, however, the
word "dust" was inadvertently omitted from the P015 listing for "beryllium dust" in the
261.33(e) list of hazardous wastes. In addition, it became apparent that the term "beryllim dust"
is not used by the industry to describe this commerical chemical product; the actual term used by
the industry is "beryllium powder". This technical correction adds "powder" to the P015
hazardous waste listing for "beryllium" and makes conforming changes to the list of hazardous
constituents in Part 261 Appendix VIII and to Table 2 in § 268.42(a).
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STHN-
GENT
BROADER
m SCOPE
PART 261 - IDENTIFICATION AND LISTING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
SUBPART D-LISTS OF HAZARDOUS WASTES
DISCARDED COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS, OFF-SPECIFICATION SPECIES,
CONTAINER RESIDUES, AND SPILL RESIDUES THREREOF
correct the P015
listing as shown below
261 .33(e)
Hazardous
waste
No.
Chemical
abstracts
Ho.
SutMtanc*
P015
7440-41-7
BerryIlium powder
APPENDIX VIII TO PART 261
HAZARDOUS CONSTITUENTS
correct the P0 15
listing as shown below
Appendix VIII
June 20, 1994-Page 1 of 2
DCL134.15 - fevM* 07/16/94
PrintMfc 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO.
S
RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 134: Correction of Beryllium Powder (P015 Listing) (cont'd
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS: ^^
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRM-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
chmica1 abstracts nan* Chealcal abstracts Mo.
Hazardous waste No.
* • •
BeryUlun powder
7*40-41-7
P015
PART 268 - LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS
SUBPART D - TREATMENT STANDARDS
TREATMENT STANDARDS EXPRESSED AS SPECIFIED TECHNOLOGIES
change the P015
entry's waste
description from
•beryllium dust' to
"beryllium powder"
2 6 8. 42 (a) /Table 2
t
June 20, 1994 • Page 2 of 2
DO.t34.1S - R*VM* 07/10/94
Printed: 12/21/94
-------
t
Federal legirter / Vol. SO, Ncx 117 / Monday, June 20, 199* / Rales and Regulations 31551
SubpartZZ Wfrjmtofl
2- Section 5ZJ62O i* amended by
adding, pangFaph (fiK23) to read a»
follows:
§52.z«2fr Wentfflcatton of pant.
* » * * *
(ej • • »
(23) Chi November 1,1993. the
uhmitted a
Governor of Weening:;
for the establishment a
for the establishment and
implementation of e Snefi Business
Assistance Program t»be iiiiojperated
into the Wyoming State BapfeneirtatioB
Plan as required by section 507 of the
Clean air Act.
(i) Incorporation by tefeiaete.
(AJiNMiemberl, 1993 tatter bom the
Smett
toEPA.
(B)Tb» Slate efW
AssistBBce Pregran plan
Small B
_ plan lor the
and implfmutatioa ef a
adopted September 16, M88 by the
YVycjBaviMrwiaieiitaJ Qe«*fy
CoundL.
IFR Dee 94-WWB Fflerf 6-17-W: 8:45 aarf
40 CFR
aiXtte. Mtf 3
tln^eiMefci i^• Vfm^^^fts^BMe^He^^^^MkA
riSZofOOOV IvaeMv IIIOfRiyQnWffn
~ TecfltmefLfsttngot
AGENCY: EMfe
amendment.
SUMMARY: The Environmental Pmtertton
Agency today is correcting the listing for
"beijPlmiT far (he Bst of commercial
chemical prorfncts flat are hazardous
wastes when (Bsvaiiletl or intended to
be discarded. Tftelisttegd-scrfptfcm is
corrected to read "BenwoB powder."
Conforming di«n_ba,
made tutfaeRCRA Hat •fhazaraottK
consthnents, die RCRA. hmd dispoaal
restrictiamT technology-battd treatmer
standards, am) to dwCERCLA fist of
hazardotra: substances.
EFFECTIVE'DATE1 He amendment is
effective June 20,1994.
ADDRESSES! The Office of SoMd Waste
(OSW) BCRA Docket is located at the
following. addnsK EPA BCRA Docket
Clerk, room 2516 (5305). U.S.
Environmental Protedkm Agency. 401
M Street SW-WaabJuafcrn. DC 2O46O.
The docketia.e.MkfamBaJB.to4
p.m. Monday through Friday, exchHteg
Federal holidays. The public must make
an appointment to review docket
materials by erflian 303^2804927. The- List of Subjects
public-»y copy 10O pegee from- tfw
docket at no chan
(at no charge? addftionaf copies;
areSaiSperpaf.*
FOR FURTHER MFOMU.TOK CONTACT:
The RCRA/Supei&ind Hotliaa «t V-8*O-
424-S34& For technical iafbauttea
contact Wanda L. Levise, Office of Solid
Waste C5304). U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency. 401 M Street, SW.,
\TasLingUKuDC20460. 202-260-7458.
SUPPLEMEKDeW aaiUHaiAiMfc Ob Awit
22. 1988. EFApoblfsbed* technical
comctions notice to naka a number of
conecttoas to 40 CfH 261 J3W art »
and to appendix VIB of 4O CFK pest 2«1
(53 FR 133B3). to that notice, the weri
^^ &ndvu||Kll7 onrined from
.
Beryllium dBat," which was
listing promulgated OB May 19V X9«X
There ham beea •
sincelke ApcB 22.
EPA beerenponrferi in. each
explainiHg Met the
mistakenly emftteeX but that inteM ef
listuo. I/*., to bel ae hemdoiei the
coBBercial cbemicei prodect.
inumded t»be dtacarde*) beeatmeiBed.
hi fact, the teed diepoaat reatnctieBe
refer to P»15 « ~B»«yH>Mn* dost."
the comBiercml chenical piedHtct has
indiceled (bat "berytttum powder" is
the actual tern need te- dtiiiu Jbe feeir
product. The term duel EF aet ased1 by
industiy le> describe the conuawcie)
chemical product.
For the purpose of cUriGcation, EPA
is adding, Ae woid "peMde." to the
P015 listing description. Since this
change is only a clarification1, the scope
neither b
il dtahriihed w
otherwise affected by this technical
collection •neodnmL
In aider te-iectffy tkfe eoafaraqn is
the reg^eted conmruoity, the- Agency
today is corrertmg me CoeV ef Federal
40 CFB Port 261
Environmental protection, Hazardous
wastes, RecycGng, Reporting and
"powder" to the POM Iktiag for
beryllium. CbBfeTHiingehaRges also are
being iMdefcUhgROtA Bst of
hazardouB- GoMtftMnts, AelHJtA IBM
disposal lesfci-litma tedmulugy-beaed
in mini in luaiiiniii iiniTui HIM mrrr ii
list of bazardew substances.
Because this action Is a •HhmiCTT
correction, prior notice and opportunity
for comment is unnecessary, and good
cause exists for this change to take effect
immediately [see 5 U.S.C 553(bfl.
Accordingly, the Agency is not seeking
any comments based on today's notice.
40 CFR Part 268
Hazardous waste, Beporting and
recordlceepnig retjuiieuieBts.
4Q CFR Pact 302
Air polluttoB cootioi.
Emergency Planning and Community
Right-to-Knoar Act, Extreme)?
bazardaossiihiaimev Kaardcua
chemicals. Hazardous material,
Hazardous materials transportation.
Hazardous substances. Hazardous
wastes. Intergovernmental relations.
NUvral reaeoce* Pesticides and pesto,
Reporting and recordki
requirements, Superfuwj
.Waste
treatment and disposal. Water pollution
comtrof. Water supply.
Dated: fonefr.WM.
EttotTF. Law*.
Assistant Mminittrator^ Office of Solid IKaste
and Emergmtyltteponse.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble. Chapter i. e£ true 4O of the
Code of Federal Segulatioes is. amended ,
as follow*:
PART 261—IDENTIFICATION AND
LISTING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
1. The authority dteHew tat pert 2M
Aulhortty: 42 U.S.C 6905.6912(a). 6921.
6922,693ft.
|261.33 [Amended]
2. In § 261.33 (eX me> listuag for P615
is revised to read as follows:
Hazard-
waste
P015 7440-41-7 Berylliwii powder
Appendix VU (Amaoded)
3. In appendix VBLtheSstmgmf
BeryUium. is lerfeed te nad as loilows:
Chami.
Cortvnon ctf tf^
Hazstdr
ous
NO-
NO.
Beryttum Same.... 7«0-«T-7 P815
-------
31552 Federal Register / Vol. 59. No. 117. / Monday. June 20. 1994 / Rules and Regulations
PART IBS-LAND DISPOSAL
RESTRICTIONS
1. The authority citation for part 268
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 US.C 6905.6912(a), 6921,
6934.
2: In $ 268.42 revise the "Wastes
descriptions and/or treatment
subcategory" entry for Waste Code P015
to read "Beryllium powder."
PART302-OESK3NATION,
REPORTABtE QUANTITIES, AND
NOTIFICATION
1. The authority citation for part 302
continues to read as follows:
Avlfaorirjr: 42 U.S.C. 9602.9603. and 9604;
33 U.S.C 1321 and 1361.
$3024 (Amended)
2. In § 302.4. in the table in paragraph
(b). the listing for "Beryllium" is
removed and under the column heading
"Hazardous substances", "Beryllium
dust" is revised to read "Beryllium
"powder".
AppandtaA {Amended]
3. hi appendix A the listing for
7440417 is revised to read "Beryllium
powder".
|FR Doc. 94-14935 Filed 6-17-34; 0:45 am]
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Parts 73 and 74
[MM Docket Ma 93-114, FCC 94-1201
Radio Broadcast Service*; Low Power
Teiev Won Service; Application
Acceptanc* Standard; Four-Letter Call
Slgna
AGENCY: Federal Communications
ACTION; Final rule.
' SUMMARY: The Commission amended its
rules governing the low power
television (LPTV) service in three
respects. First, the Commission relaxed
its strict acceptance standard for new
and major change applications. Second.
the Commission expanded the waiver
LPTV operators to request four-letter
all sims with the suffix "LP" rather
. Commission declined to adopt a '
proposal to narrow the definition of
what constitutes a major LPTV station
modification, stating that this issue
requires further consideration end will
be resolved at a later date. A summary
of the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
initiating this proceeding may be found
at 58 FR 25,794 (April 28,1993).
EFFECTIVE DATES: The revisions to
§§ 73.3564 and 73.3591 relieve existing
restrictions and as such, they an
exempt from the effective date
requirements of the Administrative
Procedure Act. 5 lLS.C.553(d)(l), and
will become effective June 20.1994. The
revisions to $73.3522 will become
effective August 19,1994. The revisions
to $$ 73.3550. 74.780.74.783 and to the
Commission's terrain shielding policy
in the LPTV service will become
effective August 19.1994.
FOR FURTHER ^FORMATION CONTACT:
Keith A. Larson. Mass Media Bureau.
Video Services Division, Low Power
Television Branch, (202) 632-3894.
SUPPLEMENTARY MFOftMATON: The
following Is a synopsis of the
Commission's First Report and Order,
MM Docket No. 93-114, adopted May
19.1994. and released June 2,1994. The
full text of this decision is available for •
inspection and copying during normal
business hours in the PCCs Reference
Center (room 239). 1919 M Street. NW.,
Washington, DC. The complete text of
this decision may also be purchased
from the Commission's copy '
contractors. International Transcription
Service, Inc. (202) 857-3600,2100 M
Street, NW.. Suite 140. Washington, DC
20037.
Synopsis of First Report and Order
Introduction
1. On April 22,1993, the Commission
released Its Notice of Proposed Rule
Mating in MM Docket No. 93-114,8
FCC Red 2770 (1993). In the Notice, the
Commission ntotMsed to amend the
than the current five-character call signs
consisting of letters and numbers. The
rules ana policies governing the low .
power television (LPTV) service, which
includes LPTV stations and television
translator stations. Specifically, we
proposed to modify our current
standard for acceptance of applications
and to expand our waiver policy
regarding terrain shielding. We also
proposed to permit LPTV operators to
use four-letter call signs rather than the
current five-character call signs
consisting of letters and numbers. These
proposals raised little disagreement
among coromenters and are adopted in
this First Report and Order. In addition,
the Notice proposed to narrow the
definition of what constitutes a major
LPTV station modification. That issue
generated significantly more diverse
comment and requires further
consideration. It will be resolved at a
later date so as not to delay
implementation of the changes we adopt
herein.
Application Acceptance Standards
2. In the Notice, the Commission
noted that the volume of LPTV
applications has decreased and the
quality of those submissions has
improved as a result of the strict
standard requiring that an LPTV
applicant be "complete and sufficient"
(i>.. "letter perfect") at the close of an
LPTV filing window.* We pointed out
that currently, applications that are not
letter perfect an returned, forcing
applicants to wait until the Commission
opens a subsequent filing window to
correct their submission*. See 47 CFR
73.3S64UM2). The Notice concluded
that the strict standard baa achieved its
purpose of encouraging applicants to
submit complete and carefully prepared
applications, so as to alleviate the LPTV
application backlog with which the
Commission was faced. We therefore
proposed that applications be judged on
• "substantially complete" basis similar
to thai used in processing full-power
television applications, whereby
applications are considered acceptance
if they are not patently defective. As an
alternative to the substantially complete
standard, the Notice suggested a mid-
level acceptance standard requiring the
application to be more than
substantially complete but less than
letter perfect.
3. The commenters in. this proceeding,
who include LPTV licensees, consulting
engineers, other broadcasters, law firms
and educational institutions,
overwhelmingly support adoption of a
relaxed standard for acceptance of
applications. They agree with the Notii
that the letter perfect standard is no
longer necessary due to the decreased
volume of LPTV applications. They also
assert that the letter perfect requirement
unfairly forces LPTV applicants filing
defective applications to wait to refile in
the next filing window, which
sometimes does not open for a year.
Further, commenters assert that a
relaxed standard is more appropriate in
ce
f
1 Application* (or LPTV conrtruction pemits ar.ri
nwfor chmgn to wfetint LPTV bcfflttas an
•cccptod during finlM filing windowi by the
Conunitaion.
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
I
ATTACHMENT B
Updates to the
State Authorization Manual (SAM)
-------
1
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
t
Model Revision Attorney General's Statement
The following pages (numbered 9 through 67)
should replace pages 9 through 63 of
SAM Appendix E
-------
t
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
MODEL REVISION ATTORNEY GENERAL'S STATEMENT FOR FINAL
AUTHORIZATION FOR CHANGES TO THE FEDERAL
RCRA PROGRAM FROM JANUARY 1983 THROUGH
JUNE 1994
I hereby certify, pursuant to my authority as
and in accordance with Section
3006(b) of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, as amended by the Hazardous and
Solid Waste Amendments of 1984 (42 USC 6901 gl sea.), and 40 CFR 271 that in my opinion
the laws of the State [Commonwealth] of provide adequate authority to carry
out the revised program set forth in the revised "Program Description" submitted by the [State
Aaencv1. The specific authorities provided are contained in statutes or regulations lawfully
adopted at the time this Statement is signed and which are in effect now (shall be fully
effective by ],as specified below. These authorities and this certification
supplement [or supercede (and indicate how supercede)] the previously certified authorities
described in my [or my predecessors] certification(s) of (date or dates).
Please add an explanation of how the Revision Attorney General's Statement you are
submitting relates to any prior Attorney General's Statements you have submitted.
t
I. IDENTIFICATION AND LISTING
A. State statutes and regulations contain lists of hazardous waste which encompass all
wastes controlled under the following Federal regulations as indicated in the designated
Revision Checklists:
(1) Chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons, 40 CFR 261.31 and Part 261 Appendices VII
and VIII as amended February 10, 1984 [49 FJB 5308], Revision Checklist 4.
1 (2) ^OPTIONAL: This is a reduced requirement.] Warfarin and zinc phosphide
listing, 40 CFR 261.33(e) and (f) as amended May 10, 1984 [49£fi 19923],
Revision Checklist 7.
(3) TDI, DNT and TDA wastes, 40 CFR 261.32, 261.33(f), and Part 261
Appendices III, VII and VIII as amended October 23. 1985 [50 FR 42936],
Revision Checklist 18.
(4) Spent solvents, 40 CFR 261.31, as amended December 31, 1985 [50 FR
53319] and January 21, 1986 [51 FR 2702], Revision Checklist 20.
(5) EDB wastes, 40 CFR 261.32 and Part 261 Appendices II, III and VIII, as
amended February 13, 1986 [51 FR 5330], Revision Checklist 21.
1The phrase "OPTIONAL: This is a reduced requirement" is used to indicate provisions that
either are less stringent or reduce the scope of the program. Any State that adopts an
"optional" requirement must ensure that it is at least as stringent as the Federal requirement.
AGREV15 -9/27/94
|Prwrt*d 12/21/941
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9641.00-21
SPA 15
(6) Pour spent solvents, 40 CFR 261.31, 261.33(f), and Part 261 Appendices III, VII
and VIII as amended February 25, 1986 [51 FR 6541], Revision Checklist 22.
,«
(7) TQPTIQNAL: This is a reduced requirement.] Listing of spent pickle liquor from
steel finishing operations, 40 CFR 261.32, as amended May 28, 1986 [51 FR
19320] and September 22, 1986 [51 f_g 33612], Revision Checklist 26.
(8) Listing of commercial chemical products and Appendix Vill constituents, 40 CFR
261.33 and Part 261 Appendix VIII, as amended August 6, 1986 [51 FR
28296], Revision Checklist 29; as amended July 10, 1987 [52 Ffi 26012],
Revision Checklist 41; and as amended April 22, 1988 (53 £g 13382], Revision
Checklist 46.
(9) EBDC wastes, 40 CFR 261.32 and Part 261 Appendices III and VII, as amended
on October 24, 1986 [51 fB 37725], Revision Checklist 33.
(10) Listing of spent potliners from aluminum reduction (K088), 40 CFR 261.32 and
Part 261 Appendix VII, as amended September 13, 1988 [53 £B 35412],
Revision Checklist 53.
(11) [OPTIONAL: This is a reduced requirement.] Generic delisting of iron dextran
(CAS No. 9004-66-4), 40 CFR 261.33(f) and Part 261 Appendix VIII, as
amended October 31, 1988 [S3 F_R 43878], Revision Checklist 56.
02) IQPTIONAL: This is a reduced requirement.] Generic delisting of strontium
sutfide (CAS No. 1314-96-1), 40 CFR 26L33(e) and Part 261 Appendix VIII, as
amended October 31, 1988 [53 £fi 43881] and February 25, 1991 [56 FR
7567], Revision Checklists 57 and 86.
(13) Listing of two wastes (K131 and K132) generated during the production of
methyl bromide, 40 CFR 261.32 and 261 Appendices III and VII, as amended
October 6, 1989 [54 £B 41402], Revision Checklist 68.
(14) Listing of one generic category (F025) of waste generated during the
manufacture of chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons by free radical catalyzed
processes and amending F024, 40 CFR 261.31 and 261 Appendix VII; adding
one toxicant to 261 Appendix VIII; as amended December 11, 1989 [54 FR
50968], Revision Checklist 69.
(15) [OPTIONAL: This is a reduced requirement.] Amendments to the F019
hazardous waste listing to exclude wastewater treatment sludges from zirconium
phosphating in aluminum can washing, when such phosphating is an exclusive
conversion coating process. 40 CFR 261.31, as amended February 14, 1990 [55
£B 5340], Revision Checklist 72.
t
10
AGREV15 - 9/27/94
IPKnM: 12/21/941
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9641.00-21
SPA 15
t
(16) Listing of four wastes (K107-K110) generated during the production of 1,1-
dimethylhydrazine (UDMH) from carboxylic acid hydrazides, 40 CFR 261.31 and
Part 261 Appendices III and Vil, as amended May 2, 1990 [55 £R 18496],
Revision Checklist 75.
(17) Listing of one waste (F039), 40 CFR 261.31 and Part 261 Appendix VII, as
amended June 1, 1990 [55 PR 22520] and January 31, 1991 [56 FR 3864],
Revision Checklists 78 and 83.
(18) Listing of two wastes (F037 and F038) generated in the separation of
oil/water/solids from petroleum refinery process wastewaters and oily cooling
wastewaters, 40 CFR 261.31 and Part 261 Appendix VII, as amended November
2, 1990 [55 FR 46354] and December 17, 1990 (55 FR 51707], Revision
Checklist 81.
(19) Listing of three wastes (F032, F034 and F035) from wood preserving operations
that use chlorophenolic, creosote and/or inorganic (arsenical and chromium)
preservatives, 40 CFR 261.31, and 261 Appendices III, VII and VIII, as amended
December 6, 1990 [55 FR 50450], Revision Checklist 82.
(20) [OPTIONAL: This is a reduced requirement.] Administrative stay removing, from
the K069 listing, slurries generated from air pollution control devices that are
intended to capture acid gases and are not dedicated chiefly to control
paniculate air emissions, 40 CFR 261.32, as amended May 1, 1991 [56 FR
19951], Revision Checklist 88.
(21) [OPTIONAL: This is a reduced requirement.] Redefinition of F037 and F038
listings to exclude 1) sludges from non-contact once-through cooling waters
from both listings and 2) floats generated in aggressive biological treatment units
from the F038 listing, 40 CFR 261.31 as amended May 13, 1991 [56 FR
21955], Revision Checklist 89.
(22) [OPTIONAL: This is a reduced requirement.] Administrative stay, from June 13,
1991 to December 24, 1992, of F032, F034 and F035 listings regarding 1)
wastewaters that have not come into contact with process contaminants and 2)
plants that have previously used chlorophenolic formulations, 40 CFR 261.31 as
amended June 13, 1991 [56 £5 27332] and December 24. 1992 [57 £5
61492], Revision Checklists 91 and 120.
(23) Listing of seven wastes (K141, K142, K143, K144, K145, K147, and K148)
generated during the production, recovery and refining of coke by-products
produced from coal, 40 CFR 261.32, and Part 261 Appendix Vil as amended
August 18, 1992 [57 FR 37284], Revision Checklist 110.
(24) Listing of three wastes (K149, K150, and K151) from the production of
chlorinated toluenes, 40 CFR 261.32 and Part 261 Appendix VII, as amended
October 15, 1992 [57 FR 47376], Revision Checklist 115.
11
AGREV15 - 9/27/94
d: 12/21/941
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541,00-21
SPA 15
(25) [OPTIONAL: This is a reduced requirement.] Exceptions to listings of F032,
F034, and F035 for wastewaters that have not come into contact with process
contaminants, 45 CFR 261.31 as amended December 24, 1992 157 FR 61492],
Revision Checklist 120.
(26) [OPTIONAL: This is a reduced requirement.] Exception to listing of F032 for
potentially cross-contaminated wastes that are otherwise currently regulated as
hazardous wastes (i.e., F034 or F035), and where the generator does not
reserve or initiate the use of chlorophenolic formulations, 40 CFR 261.31 as
amended December 24, 1992 [57 FR. 61492], Revision Checklist 120.
(27) Listing of three chemicals from wood surface protection processes, 40 CFR 261
Appendix VIM, as amended January 4, 1994 (59 £5 458], Revision Checklist
128.
(28) Listing of Beryllium (P015) is amended to read "Beryllium powder,* 40 CFR
261.33 and Pan 261, Appendix VIII, as amended June 20, 1994 159 FR 31551],
Revision Checklist 134.
Federal Authority: RCRA §3001 (b).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
B. State statutes and regulations define hazardous waste so as to control the
generation, transportation, treatment, storage and disposal of hazardous waste produced by
small quantity generators of between 100 and 1000 kilograms/month as indicated in Revision
Checklist 23 (which supercedes prior amendments by Revision Checklist 17 A) and Revision
Checklist 47 (providing technical corrections to Checklist 23). State statutes and regulations
also require small quantity generators to certify good faith efforts to minimize waste generation
and to select the best available and affordable treatment, storage or disposal alternatives, 40
CFR Part 262 as amended October 1, 1986 {51 £R 351901, Revision Checklist 32 (see Item IX
below).
Federal Authority: RCRA 53001 (d); 40 CFR Parts 260-263 and 270 as amended March 24,
1986 (51 £B 10146), October 1, 1986 (51 FR 35190), and July 19, 1988 (53 £5 27162).
Citation of Laws and Reaulations: Date of Adootion and Effective Date
I
Remarks of the Attorney General
C. [This requirement applies only if States have a delisting mechanism. This
requirement is NOT OPTIONAL for such States.] State statutes and regulations provide
authority to delist hazardous waste as indicated in Revision Checklist 17 B.
12
AGREV15 - 9/27/94
IPrintad:
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
(1) State statutes and regulations require that before 'deciding to deiist a waste, the
State must consider whether any listing factor (including additional constituents)
other than those for which the waste was listed would cause the waste to be
hazardous.
Federal Authority: RCRA §3001 (f)(1); 40 CFR 260.22 as amended July 15, 1985 (50 FR
28702) and June 27, 1989 (54 FB 27114).
(2) State statutes and regulations require that there be no new temporary dehstings
without prior notice and comment. All temporary delistings received before
November 18, 1984 without the opportunity for public comment and full
consideration of such comment, shall lapse if not made final by November 8,
1986.
Federal Authority: RCRA §3001 (f)(2); 40 CFR 260.20(d) as amended July 15, 1985 (50 FR
28702>.
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
D. [OPTIONAL: This is a reduced requirement.] State statutes and regulations define
hazardous waste so as to exclude waste pickle liquor sludge generated by lime stabilization, but
only to the extent that such waste is excluded by 40 CFR 261.3(C)(2), as indicated in Revision
Checklist 8.
Federal Authority: RCRA §3001; 40 CFR 261.3(c) as amended June 5, 1984 (49 £FJ 23284).
Citation of Laws and Regulations.' Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
E. [OPTIONAL: This is a reduced requirement.] State statutes and regulations define
hazardous waste so as to not exclude household waste other than those household wastes
excluded in 40 CFR 261.4(b)(1), as indicated in Revision Checklists 9 and 17 C.
Federal Authority: RCRA §3001; 40 CFR 261.4(b)(1) as amended November 13, 1984 (49 FR
44980) and July 15, 1985 (50 £B 28702).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
AGREV16 - 9/27/94
13 |P»w»t«d: 12/21-941
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
F State statutes and regulations incorporate the second edition and updates to "Test
Methods'for Evaluating Solid Waste. Physical/Chemical Methods' (SW-846) as indicated in
Revision Checklists 11 and 3$'.'
Federal Authority: RCRA §§2002, 3001; 40 CFR 260.11, 260.21 and 270,6(a) as amended
December 4. 1984 (49 fB 47390) and March 16, 1987 (52 £R 8072).
Citation of LP«« and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Pate
Remarks of thft Attnmav General
G State statutes and regulations define solid wastes to include the hazardous
components of radioactive mixed wastes, July 3, 1986 [51 £B 245041. See State Program
Advisory (SPA) #2.
Federal Authority: RCRA §§1004(27) and 300Kb).
Citation of Laws and Regulations; Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of thft Attorney General
H. IQPTIONAL: This is a reduced requirement.] State statutes and regulations exempt
(with certain limitations) waste samples used in small scale treatabillty studies from Subtitle C
regulation as indicated in Revision Checklist 49.
Federal Authority: RCRA §3001; 40 CFR 260.10 and 261.4(e)&(f) as amended July 19, 1988
(53 £fi 27290).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
t
I. State statutes and regulations exclude from the mining waste exemption the six
wastes listed at 40 CFR 261.4(b)(7)(i) through 261.4(b)<7)(vi), as indicated in Revision
Checklist 53.
Federal Authority: RCRA §3001 (b); 40 CFR 261.4(b)(7) as amended September 13, 1988 (53
£R35412).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
14
A6REV16 -9/27/94
: 12/21/94]
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9641.00-21
... .. SPA 15
J. State statutes and regulations that:
(1) provide final criteria to define Bevill-excluded mineral processing wastes, finalize
the Bevill status of nine mineral processing waste streams, and list those mineral
processing wastes subject to conditional retention as indicated in Revision
Checklist 65.
Federal Authority: RCRA §3001 (b); 40 CFR 261.3 and 261.4 as amended September 1, 1989
(54 FR 36592).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
I
(2) remove five conditionally retained mineral processing wastes from the exemption
from hazardous waste regulation under the Bevill exclusion, and amend the
definitions of "beneficiation" and "designated facility" as indicated in Revision
Checklists 71 and 90.
Federal Authority: RCRA 53001 (b)(3)(A)(ii); 40 CFR 260.10 and 26l.4(b)(7> as amended
January 23, 1990 (55 FR 2322) and June 13.1991 (56 FR 27300).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
K. State statutes and regulations incorporate 47 new testing methods as approved
methods for use in meeting the regulatory requirements under Subtitle C of RCRA as indicated
in Revision Checklists 67 and 73.
Federal Authority: RCRA §13001, 3004, 3005, and 3006; 40 CFR 260.11 and Part 261
Appendix III as amended September 29, 1989 (54 £5 40260) and March 9, 1990 (55 FR
8948).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
L. State statutes and regulations revise the existing toxicity characteristic by replacing
the Extraction Procedure (EP) leach test with the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure
(TCLP) for identifying wastes that are defined as hazardous and subject to regulation under
Subtitle C of RCRA as indicated in Revision Checklists 74, 108 and 117B. State statutes and
regulations also provide for the addition of 25 organic chemicals and their regulatory levels to
the list of toxic constituents of concern as indicated in Revision Checklist 74.
15
AGREV16-9/27/94
!Prw««d: 12/21/941
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA IS
Federal Authority: RCRA §§1006, 2002(a), 3001, 3002, 3004,3005 and 3006; 40 CFR Parts
261, 264, 265 and 268 as amended March 29, 1990 (55 FR 11798), June 29, 1990 (55 FR
26986), June 1, 1992 (57 £S'23062), and July 10, 1992 (57 FR 30657).
C|tation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
M. State statutes and regulations contain the language to result in consistent
interpretation of the criteria for listing wastes as hazardous under RCRA as indicated in Revision
Checklist 76.
Federal Authority: RCRA §3001 (a); 40 CFR 261.11 (a)(3) as amended May 4, 1990 (55 FR
18726).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
N. State statutes and regulations add eight new testing methods to the section of
regulations that incorporates these methods by reference as indicated in Revision Checklist 79.
Federal Authority:. RCRA §§3001. 3004, 3005 and 3006; 40 CFR 260.11 (a) as amended June
21, 1990 (55 PR 25454).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
O. [OPTIONAL; This is a reduced requirement.] State statutes and regulations extend
until January 25, 1993, the compliance date for the Toxicity Characteristic requirements for
produced ground water from free phase hydrocarbon recovery operations at certain petroleum
industry sites (refineries, marketing terminals, and bulk plants) as indicated in Revision Checklist
80. The extension for infiltration galleries at such operations ends on October 2, 1991.
Federal Authority: 5 U.S.C. §§553 and 705: RCRA §3001; 40 CFR 261.4(b)(11) as amended
October 5, 1990 (55 EB 40834), February 1, 1991 (56 FFj 3978) and April 2. 1991 (56 FR
13406).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
16
AGREV15 • 9/27/94
d: 12/21/94)
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
P. State statutes and regulations include definitions of oil/water/solids and aggressive
biological treatment units and a statement concerning the point of generation for F037 and
F038 sludges as indicated on Revision Checklist 81.
Federal Authority: RCRA §3001; 40 CFR 261.31 (b) as amended November 2, 1990 (55 £5
46354) and December 17, 1990 (55 FR 51707).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
I
Q. [OPTIONAL: This is a reduced requirement.] State statutes and regulations exclude
from being a solid waste spent wood preserving solutions that have been used and are
reclaimed and reused for their original intended purpose as indicated in Revision Checklists 82
and 92.
Federal Authority: RCRA §3001; 40 CFR 261.4
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
Federal Authority: RCRA §3001; 40 CFR 261.4(b)(12) as amended February 13, 1991 (56 Fg
5910).
* *
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
T. [OPTIONAL: This is a reduced requirement.] State statutes and regulations exclude
from being a solid waste coke and coal tar from the iron and steel industry that contains or is
produced from decanter tank tar sludge, EPA hazardous waste K087, when used as a fuel as
indicated in Revision Checklist 85. The process producing the coke and coal tar from such
decanter tank tar sludge in a coke oven is also excluded from regulation.
Federal Authority: RCRA S3001; 40 CFR 261.4(a)(10) as amended February 21. 1991 (56 FR
7134).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
U. State statutes and regulation do not exclude residues, derived from the burning or
processing of hazardous waste in a boiler or industrial furnace, from the definition of a
hazardous waste under 40 CFR 261.4{b)(4),(7)or(8) unless the device and the owner or
operator meet the requirements of 40 CFR 266.112 as indicated in Revision Checklist 85.
Federal Authority: RCRA §3001; 40 CFR 261.4(b)(4), 261.4(b)(7), 261 -4(b)(8) and 266.112
as amended February 21, 1991 (56 £B 7134).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
I
V. tOPTIONAL: This is a reduced requirement.] State statutes and regulations which
exclude from being a hazardous waste certain nonwastewater residues resulting from high
temperature metals recovery of K061 provided the conditions in 261.3(c)(2)(ii)(C) are met as
indicated in Revision Checklist 95.
Federal Authority: RCRA §§3001, 3004(dHk) and (m); 40 CFR 261.3(c)(2}(ii)(C) as amended
August 19, 1991 (56 £B 41164).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
18
AGREV15 -9/27/94
(Praitwl: 12/21/941
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
FEDERAL HCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
12
SUBPART DD - CONTAINMENT BUILDINGS
APPLICABILITY
applies to
o w ners/o perators
storing or treating
hazardous waste in
units designed and
operated under
264.1101; effective
February 18, 1993,
but may notify
Regional
Administrator of
earlier time; not
subject to definition
of land disposal in
RCRA 3004(10
provided unit:
is a completely
enclosed, self-
supporting structure
designed and
constructed as
specified
has a primary barrier
designed to
withstand movement
of personnel, wastes
and handling
equipment within unit
if used to manage
liquids:
109
109
109
109
264.1100
264.1100(3}
264.1100(b)
264.1100(0
t
Page 19 of 135
DCLDR94J.1S • R*v«*tf. 7/23/94
Primtd: 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
primary barrier
designed and
constructed to
prevent migration of
hazardous
constituents into
barrier
liquid collection
system to minimize
accumulation of liquid
on primary barrier
secondary
containment system
to prevent hazardous
constituent migration
into barrier; leak
detection and liquid
collection as
specified; variance
under 264. 11 01(b) (4)
controls to prevent
fugitive dust
emissions to meet
standards
designed and
operated to ensure
containment and
prevent tracking of
materials from unit by
personnel or
equipment
*'
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
109
109
109
109
109
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
264.1100(0(1)
264.1100(0(2}
264.1100(0(3)
264.1100(d)
264.1100(6)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
•
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
•T
BRORDER
IN SCOPE
1
DESIGN AND OPERATING STANDARDS
all containment
buildings must
comply with
following design
standards:
109
264.1 101 (a)
Page 20 of 135
DCIDR94J.1S - FtevMd. 7/29/94
Prim** 12/22/9*
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
completely enclosed
as specified
design and
construction of floor,
containment walls
and secondary
containment system;
unit of sufficient
structural strength to
prevent collapse or
failure; chemically
compatible surfaces;
standards for judging
structural integrity
requirements; when
exception for light-
weight doors and
windows will apply:
provide effective
barrier against
fugitive dust
emissions under
264.1101{c)(1Hiv)
unit designed and
operated so that
wastes do not
contact openings
no placement of
incompatible wastes
or treatment reagents
that could cause unit
or secondary
containment system
to leak, corrode or
otherwise fail
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
109
109
109
109
109
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
264.1 101(a)(1)
264.1 101 (a)(2)
264.1 101 (a)(2)(i)
264.1101(a)(2)
(ii)
264.l101(a){3)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
a
Page 21 of 135
OCLDR94J 15 • R«v»*d: 7/29/94
Prnitxl: 7 2/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
must have primary
barrier designed to
withstand movement
of personnel, waste
and handling
equipment in unit
during unit operating
life, as appropriate for
waste characteristics
requirements for
hazardous waste
containing free liquids
or treated with free
liquids:
primary barrier to
prevent migration of
hazardous
constituents into the
barrier
liquid collection and
removal system to
minimize
accumulation of liquid
on primary barrier:
primary barrier sloped
to drain liquids to
collection system
liquids and waste
collected and
removed to minimize
hydraulic head on
containment system
at earliest practicable
time
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
109
109
109
109
109
109
FEDERAL RCHA CITATION
264.1101(a)(4)
264.110Kb)
264.1 101{b)(1)
264.1101(b)(2)
264.1101(b)(2Hi>
264.1101(b)(2)
(ii)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
-
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE .
STRIN-
GENT
BWTOER
IN SCOPE
I
•
•
Page 22 of 135
DCLDR94J 15
• «ov««d 7/29/94
Print** 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
secondary
containment system
to prevent hazardous
constituent migration
into barrier; leak
detection and liquid
collection as specified
what must be
installed at a
minimum to satisfy
leak detection
component of
secondary
containment system
constructed with 1 %
or greater bottom
slope
granular, synthetic, or
geonet drainage
materials as specified
if treatment
conducted in building,
treatment area
designed to prevent
releases to other
portions of building
secondary
containment
construction
materials
specifications;
requirements for use
of containment
building as tank
secondary
containment system
;
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
109
109
109
109
109
109
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
264.1 101 (b)(3>
264.11 01 (b)(3)(i)
264.1101(b)(3)(i)
(A)
264.1 101 (b)(3)(i)
(B)
264.1101(b)<3)
(ii)
264.1101(b)(3)
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
for .existing units
other than 90-day
generator units,
Regional
Administrator delay
of secondary
containment
requirement if
demonstrated that
unit substantially
meets Subpart DD
standards; for
demonstration,
owner/operator must:
provide written notice
by February 1 8,
1 993; what notice
must contain
respond to Regional
Administrator
comments within 30
days
if approved, fulfill
terms of revised
plans
owners and operators
of all containment
buildings must:
use controls and
practices to ensure
containment of
hazardous waste
within unit; at a
minimum:
maintain primary
barrier as specified
t
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
109
109
109
109
109
109
109
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
.»
264.1101(b>(4)
264.1101(b)(4)(i)
264.11 01 (b){4)
(ii)
264.11 01 (b){4)
(iii)
264.1 101 (c)
264.1 10Hc){1)
264.1 101 (c)(1 Hi)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
•
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
ImRwQER
IN SCOPE
1
r-
13
Page 24 of 135
DCLDR94J 15 - R*vM»d: 7/29/94
PnntMl 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
maintain level of
stored/treated
hazardous waste as
specified
take measures to
prevent tracking of
hazardous waste out
of unit; equipment
decontamination
area; rinsate
collection and
management
take measures to
control fugitive dust
emissions; maintain
paniculate collection
devices as specified;
when "no visible
emissions" must be
maintained
certification by
qualified registered
professional engineer;
for units in operation
prior to February 1 8,
1 993, certification
placed in operating
record or on-site files
no later than 60 days
after date of initial
operation; after
February 18, 1993,
PE certification
required prior to
operation of unit
/
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
109
109
109
109
.-
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
264.11 01 (c)(1)
(ii)
264.110KCH1)
(iii)
264.1 101{c)(1)
(iv)
264.1101{c)(2)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
t
Page 25 of 135
DCLDR94J.15 - Rvviud: 7/29/94
Prim** 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
prompt repairs of unit
throughout active life
as specified,
according to the
following procedures:
detection of condition
that has ted to a
release; leakage from
primary barrier;
owner or operator
must:
enter record of
discovery in facility
operating record
immediately remove
portion of
containment building
affected by the
condition from
service
determine steps to be
taken for repair,
remove leakage from
secondary collection
system and establish
schedule for cleanup
and repairs
within 7 days, notify
Regional
Administrator of
condition; within 14
working days,
provide written notice
to Regional
Administrator; what
written notice must
include
i
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
109
109
109
109
109
*
109
FEDERAL flCRA CITATION
264.1101(c)(3)
264.1101(c)(3Hi)
264.11 01 (c)(3){i)
(A)
264.1101{c)(3)(i)
(B)
264.1101(c}(3)(i)
(C) ,
264.1101 (c)(3)(i)
(D)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
]
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
mr
9VnER
IN SCOPE
I
14
Page 26 of 135
DCLDR94J15 - ft«v«*d 7/29/94
Pimtcd 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
W. [OPTIONAL: This is a reduced requirement.] State statutes and regulations which
exclude from being a solid waste, nonwastewater splash condenser dross residue from the
treatment of K061 in high temperature metals recovery units provided the requirements of
261.4{a}(11) are met as indicated in Revision Checklist 95.
Federal Authority: RCRA §§3001, 3004(d)-(k) and (m); 40 CFR 261.4(a)(11) as amended
August 19, 1991 (56 FR 41164).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
X. [OPTIONAL: This is a reduced requirement.] State statutes and regulations
exempt, from the definition of hazardous, used oil filters meeting the 40 CFR 261.4(b)(15)
criteria as indicated in Revision Checklists 104 and 107.
Federal Authority: RCRA §§1004, 1006, 2002, 3001 and 3014; 40 CFR 261.4(b)(15) as
amended May 20, 1992 (57 FR 21524) and July 1, 1992 (57 FR 29220).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
V. [OPTIONAL: This is a reduced requirement.] State statutes and regulations
exclude from being a solid waste K060, K087, K141, K142, K143, K144, K145, K147 and
K148, and those coke by-product residues that are hazardous only because they exhibit the
Toxicity Characteristic when, subsequent to generation, these wastes are recycled by being
returned to coke ovens, to the tar recovery process as a feedstock to produce coal tar, or
mixed with coal tar as specified in Revision Checklists 105 and 110.
Federal Authority: RCRA §§3001(e)(2) and (h); 40 CFR 261.4(a)(10) as amended June 22,
1992 (57 FR 27880) and August 18, 1992 (57 FR 37284).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
Z. [OPTIONAL: This is a reduced requirement.] State statutes and regulations
contain reissued mixture and derived-from rules as indicated in Revision Checklist 117 A.
19
AGREV15 - 9/27/94
(Pimted: 12/21<94|
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
Federal Authority: RCRA §§1006, 2002(a), and 3001-3005; 40 CFR 261.3, as amended
March 3, 1992 (57 FR 7628), June 1, 1992 (57 FR 23062) and October 30, 1992 (57 FR
49278).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
AA. (OPTIONAL: This is a reduced requirement.] State statutes and regulations do
not require the use of the spike recovery correction as part of the Toxicity Characteristic
Leaching Procedure as indicated in Revision Checklist 119.
Federal Authority: RCRA §§1006, 2002, 3001, 3002 and 3006; 40 CFR 261, Appendix II. as
amended November 24, 1992 (57 FR 55114) and February 2, 1993 (58 FR 6854).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
BB. State statutes and regulations replace the current Second Edition (including
Updates I and II) of the "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods,"
EPA Publication SW-846, by incorporating by reference the Third Edition (and its first update) of
this test methods manual. Throughout the State's code, references to test methods directly
refer to the methods as they are found in SW-846, as indicated in Revision Checklist 126.
Federal Authority: RCRA §§1006; 2002, 3001, 3002, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3010, and 3014;
40 CFR 260.11 (a); 260.22(d)(1)(i); 261.22(a)(1)&(2); 261.24(a); 261 Appendices II, III, and X;
264.190(a); 264.314(0; 265.190O); 265.314(d); 268.7(a); 268.40(a); 268.41 (a); 268
Appendices I & IX; 270.6(a); 270.19(c)(1)(iii)&(iv); 270.62(b)(2)(i)(C)&(D);and
270.66(c)(2)(i)&(ii) as amended August 31, 1993 (58 FR 46040).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
CC. State statutes and regulations incorporate by reference "Test Methods for
Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods," EPA Publication SW-846, the Third
Edition {November 1986), as amended by Updates I, II and HA, as indicated in Revision
Checklists 128 and 132.
t
AGREV15 - 9/27/94
20 IPrwitod: 12/21/941
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 3541.00-21
SPA 15
Federal Authority: RCRA §§2002(a), 3001 (b), and 3001 (e)(1); 40 CFR 260.11 (a) as amended
January 4, 1994 (59 FR 458) and June 2, 1994 (59 PR 28484).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
DD. [OPTIONAL: This is a reduced requirement.] State statutes and regulations
increase the quantity and time limits for contaminated media used in treatability studies, as
indicated in Revision Checklist 129.
Federal Authority: RCRA §3001; 40 CFR 261.4(e)(2)(i)&(ii), (e)(3). (f)(3), (f)(4)r and (f)(5) as
amended February 18, 1994 (59 FR 8362).
I
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
II. DEFINITION OF SOLID WASTE
A. State statutes and regulations define hazardous waste and impose management
standards so as to control all the hazardous waste controlled under 40 CFR Parts 261, 264,
265 and 266 as indicated in Revision Checklists 13 and 37.
Federal Authority: RCRA §§3001 and 3004; 40 CFR Parts 260, 261, 264, 265, and 266 as
amended January 4, 1985 (50 FR 614), April 11, 1985 (50 FR 14216), August 20, 1985 (50
FR 33541) and June 5, 1987 (52 FR 21306).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
B. State statutes and regulations include as solid waste secondary materials, fed to
a halogen acid furnace, that exhibit a characteristic of a hazardous waste or are listed as a
hazardous waste in 40 CFR 261, Subparts C and D as indicated in Revision Checklists 85, 96,
and 111.
Federal Authority: RCRA §3001; 40 CFR Part 261.2(d)(2) and (e)(2)(iv) as amended February
21, 1991 (56 FR 7134), August 27, 1991 (56 FR 42504) and August 25, 1992 (57 FR
38558).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
21
AGREV16 - 9/27/94
IPrntcd: 12/21:941
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9641.00-21
SPA 15
»I. MANAGEMENT OF DIQXIN WASTES
f
A. State statutes and regulations contain the following requirements regarding dioxin
wastes as indicated in Revision Checklist 14:
(1) Dioxin wastes are listed and otherwise identified as hazardous wastes so as to
encompass all such wastes controlled under 40 CFR 261.5(e>, 261.7(b),
261.30(d), 261.31, 261.33(f), and-Part 261 Appendix X.
(2) Special management and permitting standards for facilities managing dioxin
wastes and prohibitions applicable to permitted arid interim status facilities, as
provided in 40 CFR Parts 264, 265, and 270.
Federal Authority: RCRA §§3001 and 3004; 40 CFR Parts 261. 264, 265 and 270 as
amended January 14, 1985 (50 FR 1978).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
A. fOPTIONAL: This is a reduced requirement.] State statutes and regulations allow
generators to accumulate at the site of generation, without a permit or interim status, as much
as 55 gallons of hazardous waste or one quart of acutely hazardous waste provided that the
generator complies with the requirements specified in §262.34(c) as indicated in Revision
Checklist 12.
Federal Authority: RCRA §§2002, 3002, 3004 and 3005; 40 CFR 262.34{c) as amended
December 20, 1984 (49 FR 49571).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
I
V. APPLICABILITY OF INTERIM STATUS STANDARDS
A. State statutes and regulations contain the following requirements regarding interim
status standards as indicated in Revision Checklists 3 and 10:
(1) Interim status standards apply to facilities identified in 40 CFR 265.Kb).
22
AGREV16 - 9/27/94
IPrmtMl: 12/21(941
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9641.00-21
SPA 15
Federal Authority: RCRA §3004; 40 CFR Part 265 as amended November 22, 1983 (48 FR
52718) and November 21, 1984 (49 FR 46095).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
VI. PAINT FILTER TEST
A. State statutes and regulations require the use of a paint filter test to determine the
absence or presence of free liquids in either a containerized or bulk waste as indicated in
Revision Checklists 16, 17 F and 25.
Federal Authority: RCRA §§3004 and 3005; 40 CFR Parts 260, 264, 265, and 270 as
amended April 30, 1985 (50 FR 18370), July 15, 1985 {50 FR 28702) and May 28, 1986 {51
FR 19176).
Citation of Laws and Regulations; Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
VII. NATIONAL UNIFORM MANIFEST SYSTEM AND RECORDKEEPING
A. State statutes and regulations require generators to use the national uniform
manifest as indicated in Revision Checklists 5 and 32.
Federal Authority: RCRA §§2002, 3002 and 3003; 40 CFR Parts 260 and 262 as amended
March 20, 1984 (49 FR 10490) and October 1, 1986 (51 FR 35190).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
B. State statutes and regulations require that generators, of between 100 and 1000
kg/mo of hazardous waste, file an exception report in those instances where the generator does
not receive confirmation of delivery of his hazardous waste to the designated facility as
indicated in Revision Checklist 42.
Federal Authority: RCRA §§3001(d) and 3002(a)(5); 40 CFR Parts 262.42 and 262.44 as
amended September 23, 1987 (52 FR 35894).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
23
AGREV15 - 9/27/94
I Printed: 12/21/941
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
C. State statutes and regulations require that the following be recorded, as it becomes
available, and maintained in the operating record, until facility closure, as indicated in Revision
Checklist 45: monitoring, testing or analytical data, corrective action where required by
Subpart F and §§264.226, 264.253, 264.254, 264.276, 264.278, 264.280. 264.303,
264.309, 264.347, and 264.602.
Federal Authority: RCRA §§3004 and 3005; 40 CFR 264.73(b) as amended December 10,
1987 (52 FR 46946).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
D. [OPTIONAL: This is a reduced requirement.] State statutes and regulations include
a burden disclosure statement with each uniform manifest form and renew the use of this form
as indicated in Revision Checklist 58.
Federal; Authority: RCRA §§2002, 3002, and 3003; 40 CFR 262.20 and Part 262 Appendix
as amended November 8, 1988 (53 FR. 45089).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
E. State statutes and regulations require that generators who ship hazardous waste to a
designated facility in an authorized state which has not yet obtained authorization to regulate
that particular waste as a hazardous waste assure that the designated facility agrees to sign
and return the manifest to the generator, and that any out-of-state transporter signs and
forwards the manifest to the designated facility, as indicated in Revision Checklist 71.
Federal Authority: RCRA §§2002, 3002 and 3003; 40 CFR 262.23(e) as amended on
January 23, 1990 (55 FR 2322).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
F. State statutes and regulations incorporate updates to the recordkeeping
instructions so that the codes used by hazardous waste treatment, storage and disposal
facilities to maintain records on-site match the codes used by these facilities on the Part A
Permit Application Form as indicated on Revision Checklist 131. The new handling codes for
Miscellaneous Units and Boilers and Industrial Furnaces, addressed by Checklist 131, are also
incorporated into the statutes and regulations.
I
AGREV16 - 9/27/94
24 [Prwrt«d: 12/21/941
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
Federal Authority: RCRA §§ 3004 and 3005; 40 CFR 264 Appendix I, 265 Appendix I as
amended March 24, 1994 (59 fR 13891).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
I
VIII. BIENNIAL REPORT
A. State statutes and regulations contain the following reporting requirements as
indicated in Revision Checklists 1 and 30.
H) The biennial report contains the information indicated in 40 CFR 262.41 (a),
264.75 and 265.75.
(2) Facilities must submit groundwater monitoring data annually to the State
Director as indicated in 40 CFR 265.94.
Federal Authority: RCRA §§3002 and 3004; 40 CFR Parts 262, 264 and 265 as amended
January 28. 1983 (48 FR 3977) and August 8, 1986 (51 FR 28566).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
I*- WASTE MINIMIZATION
A. State statutes and regulations contain the following requirements regarding waste
minimization as indicated in Revision Checklists 17 D, 30 and 32 (see Item I B above).
(1) Generators must submit report and manifest certifications regarding efforts taken
to minimize the amounts and toxicity of wastes.
Federal Authority: RCRA §3002(a)(6), (b); 40 CFR 262.41, 264.75 and 265.75 as amended
July 15, 1985 (50 FR 28702), August 8, 1986 (51 FR 28556) and October 1, 1986 (51 FR
35190).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
(2) RCRA permits for the treatment, storage, or disposal of hazardous waste on the
premises where the waste was generated must contain a certification by the
permittee regarding efforts taken to minimize the amount and toxicity of the
generated wastes.
25
AGREV15 - 9/27/94
jPrintMl: 12/21<94|
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
Federal Authority: RCRA §3005(h); 40 CFR 264.70, 264.73 and 270.30(j){2) as amended July
15, 1985 (50 FR 28702).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
X. LIQUIDS IN LANDFILLS
A. State statutes and regulations contain the following requirements regarding liquids in
landfills as indicated in Revision Checklists 17 F and 25.
(1) Effective May 8, 1985, there is a ban on the placement of bulk or
non-containerized liquid hazardous waste or hazardous waste containing free
liquids in any landfill pursuant to 40 CFR 264.314 and 265.314 as amended
July 15, 1985 and May 28, 1986.
(2) Effective November 8, 1985, there is a ban on the placement of non-hazardous
liquids in landfills unless the owner or operator satisfies the criteria set forth in
40 CFR 264.314(e) and 265.314(f) as amended July 15, 1985 and May 28,
1986.
(3) For bulk or non-containerized liquid wastes or wastes containing free liquids they
may be placed in a landfill prior to May 8, 1985, only if the requirements of 40
CFR 264.314(a) and 265.314(a) are met.
Federal Authority: RCRA §3004(c); 40 CFR 264.314, 265.314 and 270.21 (h) as amended
July 15, 1985 (50 FR 28702) and May 28, 1986 (51 £5 19176).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
B. State statutes and regulations prohibit the disposal, in hazardous waste landfills.
of liquids that have been sorbed in materials that are biodegradable or that release liquids during
routine landfill operations, as indicated in Revision Checklist 118.
Federal Authority: RCRA §3004{c); 40 CFR 260.10, 264.13, 264.314, 264.316. 265.13,
265.314, and 265.316 as amended November 18, 1992 (57 FR 54452).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
AGREV15 - 9/27/94
26 IPrtottd: 12/21/941
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
XI. GROUND-WATER MONITORING
A. State statutes and regulations provide that the §3004 groundwater monitoring
requirements applicable to surface impoundments, waste piles, land treatment units and
landfills shall apply whether or not such units are located above the seasonal high water table,
have two liners and a leachate collection system or have liners that are periodically inspected,
as indicated in Revision Checklist 171,
Federal Authority: RCRA §3004(p); 40 CFR 264.222, 264.252, 264.253, and 264.302 as
amended July 15, 1985 (50 ffi 28702).2
i
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
I
B. [OPTIONAL: This is a reduced requirement.] State statutes and regulations may
allow variances from the ground-water monitoring requirements as provided in §3004{p).
However, those variances must be restricted as provided in RCRA §3004(p) as indicated in
Revision Checklist 171.
Federal Authority: RCRA S3004(p); 40 CFR 264.90(b) as amended July 15, 1985 (50 FR
28702).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
C. State statutes and regulations provide that with regard to ground-water monitoring,
all land based hazardous waste treatment, storage, and disposal facilities analyze for a specified
core list (Part 264, Appendix IX) of chemicals plus those chemicals specified by the Regional
Administrator on a site-specific basis as indicated in Revision Checklist 40.
Federal Authority: RCRA §§1006, 2002(a>, 3001, 3004, and 3005; 40 CFR 264.98, 264.99.
Part 264 Appendix IX, and 270.14 as amended July 9, 1987 (52 FR 25942).
Citation of Laws and Regulations; Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
2Note that Revision Checklist 17 I reserved the cited sections of 40 CFR Part 264. Prior to
Revision Checklist 171, these sections of code addressed exemptions from the Subpart F
groundwater monitoring requirements.
27
AGREV15 -9/27/94
1PArt«d: 12/21 (941
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
D. State statutes and regulations specify statistical methods, sampling procedures, and
performance standards that can be used in groundwater monitoring procedures to detect
groundwater contamination at permitted hazardous waste facilities as indicated in Revision
Checklist 55.
-Federal Authority: RCRA §§1006, 2002(a), 3004 and 3005; 40 CFR 264.91, 264.92, 264.97,
264.98 and 264.99 as amended October 11. 1988 (53 PR 39720).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoptio'n and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
E. [OPTIONAL: This is a reduced requirement.] State statutes and regulations allow
owners and operators to demonstrate that an alternate hydraulically downgradient monitoring
well location will meet 40 CFR 265.91 (a)(3)(i)-(iii) criteria as specified in Revision Checklist 99.
Federal Authority: RCRA §§1006, 2002 as amended December 23, 1991 (56 FR 66365).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
A. State statutes and regulations provide the following requirements:
(1) The burning of fuel containing hazardous waste in a cement kiln is prohibited as
specified in 40 CFR 266.31 and Revision Checklist 17 J.
Federal Authority: RCRA §3004(q); 40 CFR 266.31 as amended July 15, 1985 (50 FR
28702).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
(2) Fuels containing hazardous waste and all persons who produce, distribute and
market fuel containing hazardous wastes must be regulated as indicated in
Revision Checklists 17 J, 17 K, and 19.
I
AGREV1S - 9/27/94
28 (Printed 12/21'941
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9641.00-21
SPA 15
Federal Authority: RCRA §§3004 & (3).
Federal Authority: RCRA §S3004(q)2(A) and 3004(r)(2) & (3).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
XIII. CORRECTIVE ACTION
A. State statutes and regulations contain the following corrective action requirements
as indicated in Revision Checklist 17 L:
(1) Corrective action is required for releases of hazardous waste or constituents
from any solid waste management unit at a facility seeking a permit, regardless
of when the waste was placed in the unit, in all permits issued after November
8, 1984.
Federal Authority: RCRA S3004(u); 40 CFR 264.90, 264.101 and 270.60 as amended July
15, 1985 (50 FR 28702).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
(2) Corrective action is required beyond a facility's boundary, in accordance with
RCRA §3004(v). (States now may impose these requirements through a permit
or a corrective action order. Once EPA promulgates the regulations required by
RCRA §3004(v). States will need authority to impose corrective action in a
permit following the RCRA §3004(v) regulations.)
AGREV16 - 9/27/94
29 (Printed: 12/21'94|
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO, 9541.00-21
SPA 15
Federal Authority: RCRA §3004(v)(1).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
(3) Corrective action is required beyond a facility's boundary in accordance with
RCRA §3004(v) for all landfills, surface impoundments and waste pile units
(including any new units, replacements of existing units or lateral expansions of
existing units) which receive hazardous waste after July 26, 1982.
Federal Authority: RCRA §3004(v)(2).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
(4) There is evidence of financial responsibility for corrective action on- and off-site.
Federal Authority: RCRA §§3004(a)(6); (u); 40 CFR 264.90 and 264.101 as amended July 15,
1985 (50 FR 28702).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
*
B. State statutes and regulations provide for additional information and engineering
feasibility plan requirements regarding groundwater contamination detected at the time of Part
B permit application as indicated in Revision Checklist 38.
Federal Authority: RCRA §§3004 and 3005; 40 CFR 270.14 as amended June 22, 1987 (52
FR 23447) and September 9, 1987 (52 FR 33936).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
C. State statutes and regulations require owners and operators of facilities seeking
permits to provide descriptive information on the solid waste management units themselves and
all available information pertaining to any releases from the units as indicated in Revision
Checklist 44 A.
30
AGREV15 - 9/27/94
(Printed: 12/21/9*1
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA IS
Federal Authority: RCRA §3004(u); 40 CFR 270.14 as amended December 1, 1987 (52 FR
45788).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
D. State statutes and regulations require that owners and operators of hazardous waste
treatment, storage and disposal facilities (including permit-by-rule facilities subject to 264.101)
institute corrective action beyond the facility boundary to protect human health and the
environment, unless the owner/operator is denied access to adjacent lands despite the
owner/operator's best efforts, as indicated in Revision Checklist 44 B.
Federal Authority: RCRA §3004(v); 40 CFR 264.100(6) and 264.101 (c) as amended December
1, 1987 (52 FR 45788).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
E. State statutes and regulations contain the following corrective action requirements
for injection wells as indicated in Revision Checklist 44 C.
(1) Hazardous waste injection wells now operating under RCRA interim status may
retain interim status after issuance of a UIC permit. Until a RCRA permit or a
RCRA "rider" to a UIC permit, which addresses Section 3004(u) corrective
action, is issued, the well must comply with applicable interim status
requirements imposed by §265.430, Parts 144.146 and 147, and any UIC
permit requirements.
Federal Authority: RCRA §3004(u); 40 CFR 144.1(h) as amended December 1, 1987 (52 FR
45788).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
(2) As part of the UIC permit process, available information regarding operating
history and condition of the injection well must be submitted as well as any
available information on known releases from the well or injection zone.
31
AGREV15 - 9/27/94
[Prated: 12/21/941
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
Federal Authority: RCRA §3004(u); 40 CFR 144.3Kg) as amended December 1, 1987 (52 FR
45788).
i
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
(3) UIC facility owners/operators must submit certain information related to
corrective action with their UIC applications.
Federal Authority: RCRA §3004(u); 40 CFR 270.60(b)(3) as amended December 1, 1987 (52
FR 45788).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
F. State statutes and regulations require that miscellaneous units comply with
regulations (Subpart F) regarding releases from solid waste management units when necessary
to comply with §1264.601 through 264.603 as indicated in Revision Checklist 45.
Federai Authority: RCRA §3004(u); 40 CFR 264.90(d) as amended December 10, 1987 (52 FR
46946).
Citation of Laws and Regulations; Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
G. [OPTIONAL: This is a reduced requirement.] State statutes and regulations
contain remediation waste management provisions for corrective action management units
(CAMUs) and temporary units (TUs) at RCRA facilities, as indicated in Revision Checklist 121.
Federal Authority: RCRA §§1006, 2002(a), 3004(u), 3004(v), 3005(c), 3007, and 3008(h);
40 CFR 260.10, 264.3, 264.10Kb), 264.552. 264.553, 265.Kb), 268.2(c), 270.2 and
Appendix I to 270.42, as amended February 16, 1993 (58 FR 8658).
Citation of laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
i
32
AGREV15 -9/27/94
|Ptmt»d: 12/21(941
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
XIV. HAZARDOUS WASTE EXPORTS
A. State statutes and regulations require generators and transporters of hazardous
waste destined for export outside the United States to comply with standards equivalent to
those as indicated in Revision Checklists 17 R, 31, 48, and 97 (with the latter providing
technical corrections to Checklist 31).
Federal Authority: RCRA 53017; 40 CFR 262.50 as amended July 15, 1985 (50 FR 28702),
August 8, 1986 {51 FR 28664), July 19, 1988 {53 FR 27164), and September 4, 1991 (56 FR
45704).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
XV. STANDARDS FOR FACILITIES3
A. State statutes and regulations prohibit the land disposal of hazardous waste
prohibited under 40 CFR Parts 264 and 265 as indicated in Revision Checklist 17 E. Land
disposal includes, but is not limited to, placement in landfills, surface impoundments, waste
piles, deep injection wells, land treatment facilities, salt dome and bed formations and
underground mines or caves. Deep injection well means a well used for the underground
injection of hazardous wastes other than a well to which §3020 of RCRA applies.
Federal Authority: RCRA S3004(b)-(q); 40 CFR 264.18 and 265.18 as amended July 15, 1985
{50 FR 28702).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
B. Effective on November 8, 1984, State statutes and regulations prohibit the
placement of any non-containerized or bulk liquid hazardous waste in any salt dome or salt bed
formation any underground mine or cave except as provided in §264.18(c) and §265.18(c) as
indicated in Revision Checklist 17 E. Furthermore, State statutes and regulations prohibit the
placement of any other hazardous waste in such formations until a permit is issued.
3This section contains all changes to the Federal RCRA program concerning facility
standards except for those specifically related to groundwater monitoring. This latter group of
facility standard changes are addressed by Section XI.
AGREV15
33
9/27/94
12/21,341
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
Federal Authority: RCRA §3004(b); 40 CFR 264.18 and 265.18 as amended July 15, 1985
(50 FR 28702),
Citation of Laws and Regulations; Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
C. State statutes and regulations prohibit'the use of waste oil or other materials
contaminated with hazardous wastes (except ignitible wastes) as a dust suppressant as
indicated in Revision Checklist 17 G.
Federal Authority: RCRA §3004(1); 40 CFR 266.23 as amended July 15, 1985 (50 FR
28702).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
D. State statutes and regulations require the permittee to take steps to minimize
releases to the environment in accordance with 40 CFR Part 270.30(d) as indicated in Revision
Checklist 2.
Federal Authority: RCRA §3005(c); 40 CFR Part 270 as amended September 1, 1983 (48 FR
39622).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
E. State statutes and regulations require that closure and post-closure requirements and
special requirements for containers apply to interim status landfills as indicated in Revision
Checklist 15.
Federal Authority: RCRA §3004; 40 CFR 265.310 and 265.315 as amended April 23, 1985
(50 FR 16044).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
F. State statutes and regulations require compliance with closure/post-closure and
financial responsibility requirements applicable to owners and operators of hazardous waste
treatment, storage and disposal facilities, as indicated in Revision Checklists 24, 36, and 45.
34
AGREV15 -9/27/94
|Piw>t«d: 12/21J94I
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
Federal Authority: RCRA §§3004 and 3005; 40 CFR Parts 260, 264, 265, and 270 as
amended May 2, 1986 (51 FR 16422), March 19, 1987 (52 FR 8704) and December 10, 1987
(52 FR 46946).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
G. [OPTIONAL: This is a reduced requirement.] State statutes and regulations allow
qualified companies that treat, store or dispose of hazardous waste to use a corporate guaran-
tee to satisfy liability assurance requirements as indicated in Revision Checklists 27 and 43.
Federal Authority: RCRA §§2002, 3004, and 3005; 40 CFR 264.147, 264.151, and 265.147
as amended July 11, 1986 (51 FR 25350) and November 18, 1987 (52 FR 44314).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
H. State statutes and regulations require companies that generate, treat or store
hazardous waste in tanks to comply with tank standards equivalent to those indicated in
Revision Checklists 28 and 52.
Federal Authority: RCRA §§1006, 2002, 3001 - 3007, 3010, 3014, 3017 - 3019 and 7004;
40 CFR Parts 260, 261, 262, 264, 265, and 270 as amended July 14, 1986 (51 FR 25422),
August 15, 1986 (51 FR 29430) and September 2, 1988 (53 FR 34079).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
I. State statutes and regulations require environmental performance standards;
monitoring, testing, analytical data, inspection, response and reporting procedures; and
post-closure care for miscellaneous units as indicated in Revision Checklist 45.
Federal Authority: RCRA §§3004 and 3005; 40 CFR 264.600, 264.601, 264.602, and
264.603 as amended December 10, 1987 (52 FR 46946).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
J. [OPTIONAL: This is a reduced requirement.] State statutes and regulations allow
owners and operators of landfills, surface impoundments, or land treatment units, under limited
35
AGREV1S - 9/27/94
(Printed: 12'21-Mi
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
circumstances, to remain open after the final receipt of hazardous wastes in order to receive
non-hazardous wastes in that unit as indicated in Revision Checklist 64.
i
Federal Authority: RCRA §§1006, 2002(a), 3004, 3005 and 3006; 40 CFR 264.13, 264.112,
264.113, 264.142, 265.13, 265.112, 265.113, 265.142 and Appendix I to 270.42 as
amended August 14, 1989 (54 FR 33376).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
K. State statutes and regulations require new and existing hazardous waste treatment,
storage or disposal facilities to control organic air emissions from process vents and equipment
leaks as indicated in Revision Checklists 79 and 87.
Federal Authority: RCRA §§1006, 2002, 3001-3007, 3010, 3014 and 7004; 40 CFR Parts
261, 264, 265 and 270 as amended June 21, 1990 (55 FR 25454) and April 26, 1991 (56 FR
19290).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
L. State statutes and regulations contain design, operating, inspection and closure
requirements for drip pads and associated tanks, sumps and other devices used to assist in the
collection of treated wood drippage as indicated in Revision Checklists 82, 92 and 120.
Federal Authority: RCRA §§2002(a) and 3001(b)&(e)(1); 40 CFR 262.34(a)(2), 264.190,
264.570, 264.571, 264.572, 264.573, 264.574, 264.575, 265.190, 265.440, 265.441,
265.442, 265.443, 265.444 and 265.445, as amended December 6, 1990 (55 FR 50450),
July 1, 1991 (56 Ffi 30192), and December 24, 1992 (57 FR 61492).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
M. IOPTIONAL: This is a reduced requirement.] State statutes and regulations contain
an administrative stay, from June 13, 1991 to December 24, 1992, for the requirement that
new drip pads be impermeable as indicated in Revision Checklists 91 and 120.
36
AGREV15 - 9/27/94
I Printed: 12/21/94)
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
Federal Authority: 5 U.S.C. 705; RCRA §§2002(a) and 3001(b)&(e)(1); 40 CFR 264.572(a)(4>
and 265.443(a)(4) as amended June 13, 1991 (56 FR 27332) and December 24, 1992 (57 FR
61492).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
N. I OPTIONAL: This is a reduced requirement.] State statutes and regulations contain
an administrative stay, until October 30, 1992, for the requirement that existing drip pads be
impermeable as indicated in Revision Checklist 101.
Federal Authority: 5 U.S.C. 705; RCRA §§2002(a) and 3001(b)&(e)(1); 40 CFR 264.573(a)(4),
and 265.443(a)(4) as amended February 18, 1992 (57 FR 5859).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
O. [OPTIONAL: This is a reduced requirement.] State statutes and regulations allow
the use of additional financial instruments (letter of credit, a surety bond, a guarantee, trust
fund, and purchase of insurance by other firms) to meet the liability coverage requirements as
specified in Revision Checklist 113.
Federal Authority: RCRA §§2002(a), 3004 and 3005; 40 CFR 264.141, 264.147, 264.151,
265.141, 265.147 and 265.151 as amended September 1, 1988 (53 FR 33938), July 1, 1991
(56 FR 30200), and September 16, 1992 (57 FR 42832).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
P. (OPTIONAL: This is a reduced requirement.] State statutes and regulations include
conforming changes to 264.147(f)(6) and 265.147(f)(6) to expand the instruments available to
owners and operators that no longer meet the requirements of the financial test for liability
coverage as indicated in Revision Checklist 113.
Federal Authority: RCRA §3004; 40 CFR 264.147(f)(6) and 265.147(f)(6) as amended
September 16, 1992 (57 FR 42832).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
37
AGREV15 • 9/27/94
d 12/21/941
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
Q. State statutes and regulations require reporting of third-party claims against an
owner's or operator's liability coverage as indicated by Revision Checklist 113.
/
Federal Authority: RCRA §§2002
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9641.00-21
SPA 15
U. [OPTIONAL: This is a reduced requirement.] State'statutes and regulations
indicate that the "Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits" is a copyrighted
document of the International Chamber of Commerce as indicated in Revision Checklist 133.
Federal Authority: RCRA 2002(a), 3004, 3005, and 3006; 40 CFR 264.151 (d) & (k) as
amended June 10, 1994 (59 FR 29958).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
XVI, REQUIREMENTS FOR PERMITS
A. [OPTIONAL: This is a reduced requirement.] State statutes and regulations allow a
facility (1) to construct an approved TSCA facility for burning PCBs without first obtaining a
RCRA permit and (2) to subsequently apply for a RCRA permit in accordance with Revision
Checklist 17 M.
Federal Authority: RCRA §3005(a); 40 CFR 270.10(f)<3) as amended July 15, 1985 (50 FR
28702).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
B. State statutes and regulations require review of land disposal permits every five
years and modification of such permits as necessary to assure compliance with the
requirements in Parts 124, 260 through 266, and 270, as indicated in Revision Checklist
17 N.
Federal Authority: RCRA 53005(c}(3); 40 CFR 270.41 (a)(6) and 270.50(d) as amended July
15, 1985 (50 FR 28702).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
C. State statutes and regulations require permits to contain any conditions necessary to
protect human health and the environment in addition to any conditions required by regulations
as indicated in Revision Checklist 170.
39
AQREV15 - 9/27/94
(Printed: 12/21/941
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
Federal Authority: RCRA §3005(c)(3); 40 CFR 270.32(b) as amended July 15, 1985 (50 FR
28702).
/
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
D. State statutes and regulations require that:
(1) For land disposal facilities granted interim status prior to 11/8/84, interim status
terminates 11/8/85; unless a Part B application and certification of compliance
with applicable groundwater monitoring and financial responsibility requirements
are submitted by 11/8/85, as indicated in Revision Checklist 17 P.
Federal Authority: RCRA §3005(e); 40 CFR 270.73(c) as amended July 15, 1985 <50 FR
28702).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
(2) For land disposal facilities in existence on the effective date of statutory or
regulatory changes under this Act that render the facility subject to the
requirement to have a permit and which is granted interim status, interim status
terminates 12 months after the date the facility first becomes subject to such
permit requirement unless a Pan B application and certification of compliance
with applicable groundwater monitoring and financial responsibility requirements
are submitted by that date as indicated in Revision Checklist 17 P.
Federal Authority: RCRA §3005(e); 40 CFR 270.73(d) as amended July 15, 1985 (50 FR
28702).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
(3) Interim status terminates for incinerator facilities on 11 /8/89 unless the
owner/operator submits a Part B application by 11 /8/86 as indicated in Revision
Checklist 17 P.
40
AGREV16 -9/27/94
IFtittid: 12/21,941
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
Federal Authority: RCRA §3005(c)(2)(C); 40 CFR 270.73(e) as amended July 15, 1985 (50 PR
28702).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
(4) Interim status terminates for any facility other than a land disposal or an
incineration facility on 11 /8/92 unless the owner/operator submits a Part B
application by 11 /8/88 as indicated in Revision Checklist 17 P.
Federal Authority: RCRA §3005(c)(2)(C); 40 CFR 270.73(f) as amended July 15, 1985 (50 FR
28702).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
E. [OPTIONAL: This is a reduced requirement.! State statutes and regulations allow
facilities to qualify for interim status if they (1) are in existence on the effective date of
statutory or regulatory changes that render the facility subject to the requirement to have a
permit and (2) comply with §270.70(a) as indicated in Revision Checklist 17 P.
Federal Authority: RCRA §3005(e); 40 CFR 270.70(a) as amended July 15, 1985 (50 FR
28702).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
F. State statutes and regulations provide that facilities may not qualify for interim
status under the State's analogue to Section 3005(e) if they were previously denied a Section
3005(c) permit or if authority to operate the facility has been terminated as indicated in
Revision Checklist 17 P.
Federal Authority: RCRA §3005(c)(3); 40 CFR 270.70(c) as amended July 15, 1985 (50 FR
28702).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
41
AGREV16 - 9/27/94
IPrnttd: 12/21/941
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9641.00-21
SPA 15
G. fgPTIONAL: This is a reduced requirement.] State statutes and regulations allow
the issuance of a one-year research, development, and demonstration permit (renewable each
year, but not for a period longer than three years) for any hazardous waste treatment facility
which proposes an innovative and experimental hazardous waste treatment technology or
process not yet regulated as indicated in Revision Checklist 17 Q. If adopted, however, the
State must require the facility to meet RCRA's financial responsibility and public participation
requirements and retain authority to terminate experimental activity if necessary to protect
health or the environment.
Federal Authority: RCRA §3005(g); 40 CFR 270.65 as amended July 15, 1985 (50 FR
28702).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
H. State statutes and regulations require landfills, surface impoundments, land
treatment units, and waste piles that received waste after July 26, 1982 and which qualify for
interim status to comply with the groundwater monitoring, unsaturated zone monitoring, and
corrective action requirements applicable to new units at the time of permitting as indicated in
Revision Checklist 17 L.
Federal Authority: RCRA §30050); 40 CFR 264.90(a) as amended July 15, 1985 (50 FR
28702).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
I. State statutes and regulations require:
(1) Surface impoundments in existence on November 8, 1984 [or subsequently
becoming subject to RCRA pursuant to §3005(j)(6)(A) or (B)J to comply with the
double liner, leachate collection, and groundwater monitoring requirements
applicable to new units by November 8, 1988 (or the date specified in
§3005(j)(6)(A) or (B)J or to stop treating, receiving, or storing hazardous waste,
unless the surface impoundment qualifies for a special exemption under
§3005(j).
Federal Authority: RCRA §3005(j)(1)&(6)(A).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
42
AQREV16 - 9/27/94
d: 12(21/941
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
(2) [OPTIONAL: This is a reduced requirement.] State1 statutes and regulations may
allow variances from the above requirements as provided in RCRA §3005(j)(2-9)
and (13). However, the availability of such variances must be restricted as
provided in RCRA §3005(j).
Federal Authority: RCRA §3005(j)(2-9).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
J. [OPTIONAL: This is a reduced requirement.] Facility owners or operators are given
the opportunity to cure deficient Part A applications in accordance with 40 CFR 270.70(b)
before failing to qualify for interim status as indicated in Revision Checklist 6.
Federal Authority: RCRA §3005; 40 CFR Part 270 as amended April 24, 1984 (49 FR 17716).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
K. State statutes and regulations allow the permit granting agency to initiate
modifications to a permit without first receiving a request from the permittee, in cases where
statutory changes, new or amended regulatory standards or judicial decisions affect the basis of
the permit as indicated in Revision Checklist 44 D.
Federal Authority: RCRA §3005(c); 40 CFR 270.41 (a)(3) as amended December 1, 1987 (52
FR 45788).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
L. State statutes and regulations require that permittees must comply with new
requirements imposed by the land disposal restrictions promulgated under Part 268 even when
there are contrary permit conditions, as indicated in Revision Checklist 44 E.
Federal Authority: RCRA §3006(g); 40 CFR 270.4(a) as amended December 1, 1987 (52 FR
45788).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
43
AGREV15 - 9/27/94
d: I2'21'94i
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
• . i
M. State statutes and regulations require information from permit applicants concerning
permit conditions necessary to protect human health and the environment as indicated in
Revision Checklist 44 F.
Federal Authority: RCRA §3005{c); 40 CFR 270.10 as amended December 1, 1987 (52 FR
45788).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
N. State statutes and regulations require post-closure permits for all landfills, surface
impoundments, waste piles and land treatment units receiving hazardous waste after July 26,
1982 as indicated in Revision Checklist 44 G.
Federal Authority: RCRA §30050); 40 CFR 270.1(c) as amended December 1, 1987 (52 FR
45788).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
O. State statutes and regulations require that all owners and operators of units that
treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste in miscellaneous units must comply with the general
application requirements (including Part A permit requirements), the Part B genera! application
requirements of §270.14, and specific Part B information requirements for miscellaneous units
as indicated in Revision Checklists 45 and 59.
Federal Authority: RCRA §§3004 and 3005; 40 CFR 264.600, 270.14 and 270.23 as
amended December 10, 1987 (52 FR 46946) and January 9, 1989 (54 FR 615).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
P. [OPTIONAL: This is a reduced requirement.] State statutes and regulations provide
owners and operators more flexibility to change specified permit conditions, to expand public
notification and participation opportunities, and allow for expedited approval if no public
concern exists for a proposed permit modification. Owner/operator permit modifications are
categorized into three classes with administrative procedures for approving modifications
established in each class. These changes are as indicated in Revision Checklist 54.
44
AGREV15 - 9/27/94
(Printed: 12/21/941
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9641.00-21
SPA 15
Federal Authority: RCRA §§2002(a>, 3004, 3005. and 3006; 40'CFR Parts 124, 264, 265,
and 270 as amended September 28, 1988 (53 JFR 37912) and October 24, 1988 (53 FR
41649).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
Q. State statutes and regulations make it clear that existing incinerator facilities must
either conduct a trial burn or submit other information as specified in 270.19(a) or (c) before a
permit can be issued for that facility as indicated in Revision Checklist 60.
Federal Authority: RCRA §3005(b); 40 CFR Part 270 as amended January 30, 1989 [54 FR
4286).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
R. [OPTIONAL: This is a reduced requirement.] State statutes and regulations allow
greater flexibility to interim status facilities to make changes during interim status following
director approval as indicated in Revision Checklist 61.
Federal Authority: RCRA §§2002(a), 3004, 3005 and 3006; 40 CFR 270.72 as amended
March 7, 1989 (54 FR 9596).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
S. [OPTIONAL: This is a reduced requirement.] State statutes and regulations lift the
reconstruction limit for changes: 1) to certain interim status units necessary to comply with
Federal, State, or local requirements, 2) necessary to allow continued handling of newly listed
or identified hazardous waste, 3) made in accordance with an approved closure plan, and 4)
made pursuant to a corrective action order as indicated in Revision Checklist 61.
Federal Authority: RCRA §§2002(a), 3004, 3005, and 3006; 40 CFR 270.72 as amended
March 7, 1989 (54 FR 9596).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
45
AGREV16 - 9/27/94
I Printed: 12/21,941
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
T. fOPTIONAL: This is a reduced requirement.] State statutes and regulations that
clarify that a permit can be denied for the active life of a facility while a decision on post
closure permitting is pending as indicated in Revision Checklist 61.
Federal Authority: RCRA §§2002(a), 3004, 3005, and 3006; 40 CFR 124.1, 124.15. 124.19,
270.1, 270.10 and 270.29 as amended March 7, 1989 (54 FR 9596).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
U. fOPTIONAL; This is a reduced requirement.] State statutes and regulations that
classify as Class 1 certain permit modifications requested by owners/operators necessary to
enable permitted facilities to comply with the land disposal restrictions as indicated in Revision
Checklist 61. Specifically these modifications include 1) adding restricted wastes treated to
meet applicable 40 CFR Part 268 treatment standards or adding residues from treating "soft
hammer" wastes, 2) adding certain wastewater treatment residues and incinerator ash, 3)
adding new wastes for treatment in tanks or containers under certain limited conditions, and 4}
adding new treatment processes, necessary to treat restricted wastes to meet treatment
standards, that take place in tanks or containers.
Federal Authority: RCRA §§2002(a), 3004, 3005 and 3006; 40 CFR 270.42 as amended
March 7, 1989 (54 FR 9596).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
V. State statutes and regulations incorporate updates to 40 CFR Part 124 as indicated
in Revision Checklist 70.
Federal Authority: RCRA §§6901 and 6902; 40 CFR 124.3, 124.5, 124.6, 124.10 and
124.12 as amended April 1, 1983 (48 FR 14146), June 30, 1983 (48 £R 30113), July 26,
1988 (53 FR 28118), September 26, 1988 (53 FR 37396) and January 4. 1989 (54 FR 246).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
W. State statutes and regulations contain Special Part B information requirements for
drip pads as indicated in Revision Checklists 82 and 92.
AGREV16 - 9/27/94
d: 12/2U94!
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
Federal Authority: RCRA §§2002(a) and 3001(b)&(e)(l); 40 CFR 270.22 as amended
December 6, 1990 (55 FR 60450) and July 1. 1991 (56 £B 30192).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
X. State statutes and regulations include permitting requirements for boilers and
industrial furnaces burning hazardous waste as indicated in Revision Checklists 85 and 94.
Federal Authority: RCRA §§1006, 2002, 3001 through 3007; 40 CFR 270.22, 270.42
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
B. State statutes and regulation require:
(1) New units, expansions, and replacement units at interim status landfills and
surface impoundments and landfills and surface impoundments for which Part B
of the permit application is received by the proper authority after November 8,
1984, meet the requirements for double liners and leachate collection systems
applicable to new permitted landfills and surface impoundments in 40 CFR
264.221 and 264.301 and 265.221 and 265.301. as indicated in Revision
Checklists 17 Hand 77.
Federal Authority: RCRA §§1006, 2002(a), 3004, 3005 and 3015(b); 40 CFR 264.221,
265.221, 264.301 and 265.301 as amended July 15, 1985 (50 FR 28702) and May 9. 1990
(55 FR 19262).
(2) [OPTIONAL: This is a reduced requirement.] Facilities which comply in good
faith need not retrofit at permit issuance unless the liner is leaking as provided in
§ §265.221 (e) and 265.301 (e) as indicated in Revision Checklist 17 H.
Federal Authority: RCRA §3015(b); 40 CFR 264.221, 265.221 and 265.301 as amended July
15, 1985 {50 FR 28702).
(3) [OPTIONAL: This is a reduced requirement.] Variances from the above
requirements are optional. However, the availability of such variances is
restricted as provided in §§264.221 (d) and (e), 264.301 (d) and (e), 265.221 (c)
and (d), and 265.301 (c) and (d) as indicated in Revision Checklist 17 H.
Federal Authority: RCRA §3015(b); 40 CFR 264.221, 265.221 and 265.301 as amended July
15, 1985 (50 FR 28702).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
C. State statutes and regulations require owners and operators of new units,
expansions, and replacement units at surface impoundments, waste piles, and landfills to meet
the monitoring and inspection Construction Quality Assurance (CQA) program, double liner,
leachate collection and removal systems, leak detection systems, action leakage, response
action plan and closure/post-closure care requirements as indicated in Revision Checklist 100.
Federal Authority: RCRA §§3004, 3005, 3006 and 3015; 40 CFR 264.19, 264.221-264.223,
264.226, 264.228, 264.251-264.254, 264.301-264.304, 264.310, 265.19,
265.221-265.223, 265.226-265.228, 265.254, 265.255, 265.259, 265.260,
265.301-265.304 and 265.310 as amended January 29, 1992 (57 FR 3462).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
48
AGREV15 - 9/27/94
ffiwrtwi: 12/21 Ml
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
XVIII. EXPOSURE ASSESSMENTS
'.
A. State laws and regulations require permit applicants for landfills or surface
impoundments to submit exposure information as indicated in Revision Checklist 17 S.
Federal Authority: RCRA §3019(a); 40 CFR 270.10(j) as amended July 15, 1985 (50 FR
28702).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
B. State laws and regulations allow the State to make assessment information available
to the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. [See CERCLA §104(i}.]
Federal Authority: RCRA §3019(b).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
XIX. AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION
A. State statutes and regulations provide that:
(1) All records shall be available to the public unless they are exempt from the
disclosure requirements of the Federal Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5
U.S.C. 552;
(2) All nonexempt records will be available to the public upon request regardless of
whether any justification or need for such records has been shown by the
requestor;
(3) The same types of records would be available to the public from the State as
would be available from EPA. [In making this certification, the Attorney General
should be aware of the types of documents EPA generally releases under the
FOIA, subject to claims of business confidentiality: permit applications; biennial
reports from facilities; closure plans; notification of a facility closure;
contingency plan incident reports; delisting petitions; financial responsibility
instruments; ground-water monitoring data (note that exemption 5
U.S.C.552(bM9) of the FOIA applies to such wells as oil and gas, rather than to
ground-water wells); transporter spill reports; international shipment reports;
manifest exception, discrepancy and unmanifested waste reports; facility EPA
identification numbers; withdrawal requests; enforcement orders; and, inspection
reports]; and,
AGREV15 - 9/27/94
49 IPmtad: 12/21/941
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
(4) Information is provided to the public in substantially the same manner as EPA as
indicated in 40 CFR Part 2 and the Revision Checklist in Appendix N of the State
Authorization Manual. [OPTIONAL: Where the State agrees to implement
selected provisions through the use of a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) the
Attorney General must certify that: "the State has the authority to enter into
and carry out the MOA provisions and there are no State statutes (e.g.. State
Administrative Procedures Acts) which require notice and comment or
promulgation of regulations for the MOA procedures to be binding.]
(5) [OPTIONAL: The State statutes and regulations protect Confidential Business
Information (CBI) to the same degree as indicated in 40 CFR 2 and the Revision
Checklist in Appendix N of the State Authorization Manual. Note, that States do
not have to protect CBI, to satisfy 3006(f). However, if a State does extend
protection to CBI then it cannot restrict the release of information that EPA
would require to be disclosed.]
Federal Authority: RCRA §3006(f); 40 CFR §271.17(c).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
XX. STANDARDS FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF WASTE FUEL AND USED OIL AND FOR THE
BURNING OF THESE MATERIALS IN BOILERS AND INDUSTRIAL FURNACES
A. State statutes and regulations contain the following requirements regarding the
burning of waste fuel and used oil fuel for energy recovery in boilers and industrial furnaces as
indicated in Revision Checklist 19:
(1) Waste fuels and used oil fuels are identified as solid wastes so as to encompass
all such wastes controlled under 40 CFR 261.3, 261.5 and 261.6.
(2) Special management standards for generators, transporters, marketers and
burners of hazardous waste and used oil burned for energy, as set forth in 40
CFR 264.340, 265.340, 266.30-35 and 266.40-44.
Federal Authority: RCRA §53001, 3004 and 3014{a); 40 CFR Parts 261, 264, 265 and 266 as
amended November 29, 1985 (50 £B 49164), November 19, 1986 (51 FR 41900) and April
13, 1987 (52 FR 11819).
Citation of Laws and Regulations.* Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
50
AGREV15 - 9/27/94
(Printed: 12/21.S4I
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
B. [OPTIONAL: This is a reduced requirement.] State statutes and regulations provide
the authority to obtain criminal penalties for violations of the waste fuel and used oil fuel
requirements, as set forth in 46 CFR 266.40-44.
Federal Authority: RCRA §§3006(h), 3008(d) and 3014; 40 CFR 271.16.
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
C. State statutes and regulations include control standards for emissions of toxic
organic compounds, toxic metals, hydrogen chloride, chlorine gas and paniculate matter from
boilers and industrial furnaces burning hazardous waste, and require owners and operators of
such facilities to comply with the general facility standards applicable to hazardous waste
treatment, storage and disposal facilities, as indicated in Revision Checklists 85, 94, 96. 111,
and 114. Hazardous waste storage units at regulated burners are subject to the 40 CFR Part
264 requirements.
Federal Authority: RCRA §§1006, 2002, 3001 through 3007, 3010 and 7004; 40 CFR
260.10, 260.11, 260.20, 261.3. 261.6. 264.1. 264.112. 264.340, 265.1, 265.112,
265.113, 265.340, 265.370, Part 266 Subpart H, and Part 266 Appendices I-X as amended
February 21. 1991 (56 FR 7134), July 17, 1991 (56 FR. 32688), August 27, 1991 (56 FR
42504), August 25, 1992 (57 FR 38558), and September 30, 1992 (57 FR 44999).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
D. [OPTIONAL: This is a reduced requirement.] State statutes and regulations contain
an administrative stay until June 22, 1992, of the permitting standards for boilers and industrial
furnaces as they apply to coke ovens burning certain hazardous wastes from the coke by-
products recovery process as indicated in Revision Checklists 98 and 105.
Federal Authority: 5 U.S.C. 705; RCRA §§2002(a) and 3001(b)&(e)(1); 40 CFR 266.100(a) as
amended September 5, 1991 (56 £5 43874) and June 22, 1992 (57 FR 27880).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
E. State statutes and regulations provide used oil management standards for used
oil generators, transporters, processors, re-refiners, burners, and marketers as indicated in
Revision Checklists 112, 122 and 130.
51
AGREV15 -9/27/94
IPrintwf: 12/21/94)
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9841.00-21
SPA IB
Federal Authority: Federal Authority: RCRA §§1004, 1006, 2002, 3001. 3014 and 7004; 40
CFR Parts 260, 261, 266 and 279 as amended September 10, 1992 (57 FR 41566), May 3,
1993 (58 FB 26420) and March 4, 1994 (58 FR 10550).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
1
Remarks of the Attorney General
F. State statutes and regulations are amended such that the procedures for
conducting air quality modeling and screening for boilers and industrial furnaces burning
hazardous wastes reference the method recommended in Appendix W of 40 CFR Part 51.
State regulations and statutes also incorporate by reference the October 1992 edition of
"Screening Procedures for Estimating the Air Quality Impact of Stationary Sources" as indicated
in Revision Checklist 125.
Federal Authority: §§1006, 2002, 3001 through 3007, 3010 and 7004; 40 CFR 260.11 (a),
266.104{e)(3), 266.106(h) and Part 266 Appendix X, as amended July 20, 1993 (58 FR
38816).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
*
Remarks of the Attorney General
G. [OPTIONAL: This is a reduced requirement.] State statutes and regulations
contain an administrative stay, until further administrative action is taken, that replaces the
current limits needed to qualify for the Bevill exemption under test number 2 with the land
disposal restriction limits for underlying constituents as.indicated in Revision Checklist 127.
Federal Authority: RCRA §§1006, 2002(a), 3004, and 3014; 40 CFR 266.112
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
Federal Authority: §3004(d)-(k) and (m); 40 CFR Parts 260, 261," 262, 263, 264, 265, 268
and 270 as amended on November 7, 1986 (51 FR 40572), June 4, 1987 {52 FR 21010), July
8, 1987 (52 FR 25760), and August 17, 1988 (53 £g 31138).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
B. State statutes and regulations for restricting the disposal of certain California list
wastes, including liquid hazardous waste containing polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) above
specified concentrations, and hazardous waste containing halogenated organic compounds
(HOCs) above specified concentrations as indicated in Revision Checklists 39, 50, and 66.
Federal Authority: RCRA §3004(d)-(k) and (m); 40 CFR Parts 262, 264, 265, 268 and 270 as
amended on July 8, 1987 {52 FR 25760), October 27. 1987 (52 F_Fj 41295), August 17, 1988
(53 FR 31138), and September 6, 1989 (54 FR 36967).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
C. State statutes and regulations for specific treatment standards and effective dates
for certain wastes from the "First Third" of the schedule of restricted wastes listed in 40 CFR
268.10 as well as land disposal restrictions for those First Third wastes for which a treatment
standard is not established as indicated in Revision Checklists 50, 62 and 66.
Federal Authority: RCRA §3004 (d)-(k) and (m); 40 CFR Parts 264, 265, 266, and 268 as
amended on August 17, 1988 (53 FR 31138), February 27, 1989 (54 FR 8264), May 2, 1989
(54 FR 18836), September 6, 1989 (54 FR 36967) and June 13, 1990 (55 FR 23935).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
AGREV15 - 9/27/94
53 (Print**: 12/21.94)
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
D. State statutes and regulations for certain treatment standards and prohibition
effective dates for certain Second Third wastes and for imposing the "soft hammer"
provisions4 of 40 CFR 268.8 o'n Second Third wastes for which the Agency is not establishing
treatment standards as indicated in Revision Checklist 63.
Federal Authority: RCRA §3004(d)-(k) and (m); 40 CFR Part 268 as amended June 23, 1989
(54 FR 26594).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
E. State statutes and standards for treatment standards and effective dates for certain
First Third "soft hammer" wastes4 as well as for certain wastes originally contained in the Third
Third of the Schedule as indicated in Revision Checklist 63.
Federal Authority: RCRA §3004(d)-(k) and (m); 40 CFR Parts 264, 265 and 268 as amended
June 23, 1989 (54 FR 26594).
Citation of Laws and Reputations; Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
F. State statutes and regulations provide specific treatment standards and effective
dates for the "Third Third" wastes, "soft hammer" First and Second Third wastes4, five newly
listed wastes, four wastes that fall into the F002 and F005 (spent solvent) waste codes, F025,
mixed radioactive/hazardous wastes, characteristic wastes, and multi-source leachate, as well
as establish revised treatment standards for petroleum refining hazardous wastes (K048-K052)
as indicated in Revision Checklists 78, 83 and 102.
"Soft hammer" wastes are those wastes for which EPA did not promulgate treatment
standards by their respective effective dates. These wastes could continue to be
disposed of in a landfill or surface impoundment until May 8, 1990 if certain
demonstrations were made and the technology requirements of RCRA §3004(o) were
met. Other types of land disposal (e.g., underground injection) were not similarly
restricted. On May 6, 1990, wastes for which EPA had not established treatment
standards became prohibited from all types of land disposal. This latter requirement is
referred to as the "hard hammer" provision and ended the soft hammer provisions which
were in effect prior to May 6, 1990.
54
AGREV1S - 9/27/94
(Print** 12/21.94)
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
Federal Authority: RCRA §53001 and 3004 (d)-(k) and (m); 40 CFR 261, 262, 264, 265, 268,
and 270 as amended June 1, 1.990 (55 £5 22520), January 31, 1991 (56 PR 3864) and March
6, 1992 (57 £R 8086).
Citation of Laws and Reputations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
G. [QPTIQISIAL: This is a reduced requirement.] State statutes and regulations provide
for alternate treatment standards for lab packs meeting certain criteria as indicated in Revision
Checklists 78 and 83.
Federal Authority: RCRA §3004(d)-(k) and (m); 40 CFR 264.316(f), 265.316(f), 268.7(aH7),
268.7(a)(8), 268.42{c), 268.42(c)(1)-(4). and Part 268 Appendices IV and V, as amended June
1, 1990 (55 FR 22520) and January 31, 1991, (56 FR 3864),
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
H. State statutes and regulations contain treatment standards under the land disposal
restrictions program for K061 as indicated in Revision Checklist 95.
Federal Authority: RCRA f 3004(d)-(k) and (m); 40 CFR 268.41 and 268.42 as amended
August 19, 1991 (56 FR 41164).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
I. State statutes and regulations provide an extension of the land disposal
restriction effective date for hazardous waste debris until May 8, 1994, as indicated in Revision
Checklists 103, 116. and 123.
Federal Authority: RCRA 53004(h)(3); 40 CFR 268.35(c)-(e) as amended May 15, 1992 (57 FR
20766); October 20, 1992 (57 Ffi 47772); and May 14, 1993 (58 FR 28506).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
J. State statutes and regulations provide an extension of the land disposal
restriction effective date, until May 8, 1993, for D008 lead-bearing hazardous materials stored
55
AGREV15 - 9/27/94
[Prrvtod: 12/21,941
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9641.00-21
SPA 15
before secondary smelting, provided the owner/operator meets the requirements specified at 40
CFR 268.35(k), as indicated in Revision Checklist 106.
Federal Authority: RCRA §3004(h>(3); 40 CFR 268.35(c} and (k) as amended June 26, 1992
(57 FR 28628).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
K. State statutes and regulations provide land disposal treatment standards for
certain hazardous wastes listed after November 8, 1984 as well as treatment standards for
debris contaminated with listed hazardous wastes or debris that exhibit certain hazardous
waste characteristics as indicated in Revision Checklist 109.
Federal Authority: RCRA §§3004(d)-(k) and (m); 40 CFR 261.3(f), 268.2, 268.5, 268.7,
268.14, 268.36, 268.40, 268.41, 268.42, 268.43, 268.45, 270.13 and 270.14, as amended
August 18, 1992 (57 fR 37194).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
L. State statutes and regulations include revisions to existing land disposal
restrictions including revision of F001-F005 spent solvents treatment standards, conversion of
wastewater standards for twenty-four "F" and "K" water codes based on scrubber standards;
revisions to K061, K062 and F006 treatment standards; change of recordkeeping requirements;
and clarification of rules related to wastes listed because they exhibit a characteristic as
indicated in Revision Checklist 109.
Federal Authority: RCRA §§3004(d)-(k) and (m); 40 CFR 261.3(a)&(c), 268.9, 268.41,
268.42, 268.43 and 268.46, as amended August 18, 1992 (57 FR 37194).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
M. State statutes and regulations allow storage and treatment in containment
buildings as indicated in Revision Checklist 109.
Federal Authority: RCRA §§3004(d)-(k) and (m); 40 CFR 260.10, 262.34, 264.110. 264.111,
264.112, 264.140, 264.142, 264 Subpart DD, 265.110, 265.111, 265.112, 265.140,
265.142, 265.221, 265 Subpart DD, 268.50, 270.42 and 270.72, as amended August 18,
1992 (57 FR 37194).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
56
AGREV15 - 9/27/94
IPrinud: 12/21/941
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
N. State statutes and regulations provide a case-by-case extension of the land
disposal effective date until May 8, 1994 for Third Third hazardous soils whose best
demonstrated available technology (BOAT) was incineration, retorting or vitrification, as well as
for Third Third soils contaminated with radioactive mixed waste as indicated in Revision
Checklists 116 and 123.
Federal Authority: RCRA §3004(h){3); 40 CFR 268.35{c)-(e) as amended October 20, 1992
(57 FR 47772) and May 14, 1993 (57 FR 28506).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
0. State statutes and regulations include land disposal restrictions and treatment
standards for certain ignitable and corrosive characteristic wastes whose treatment standards
were vacated, as indicated in Revision Checklist 124.
Federal Authority: RCRA §3004(d),{e)&(g); 40 CFR 268.37 as amended on May 24, 1993 (58
FR 29860).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
P. State statutes and regulations include a revision to P015 listing in the land
disposal restrictions technology-based treatment standards as indicated on Revision Checklist
134.
Federal Authority: RCRA §3004(d)-(k) and (m); 40 CFR 268.42(aI/Table 2, as amended June
20, 1994 (59 FR 31551).
Citation of Laws and Regulations: Date of Adoption and Effective Date
Remarks of the Attorney General
XXII. MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT (MQA1
[If the State uses the MOA to satisfy Federal procedural requirements, the Attorney
General must certify the following:
(1) The State has the authority to enter into the agreement,
(2) The State has the authority to carry out the agreement, and
57
AGREV15 - 9/27/94
IPraitod: 12/21/941
-------
(3)
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
No applicable State statute (including the State Administrative Procedure Act)
requires that the procedure be promulgated as a rule in order to be binding.]
Seal of Office
Signature
Name (Type or Print)
Title
Date
58
AGREV15 -9/27/94
I Printed: 12/21(941
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9641.00-21
SPA 15
I. Index to the checklist entries found in the
Model Revision Attorney General's Statement
Revision checklist number/name Subsections pertaining to checklist
1. Biennial Report VIII A
2. Permit Rule: Settlement
Agreement . XV D
3. Interim Status Standards V A
4. Chlorinated Aliphatic Hydrocarbons I A(1)
5. National Uniform Manifests VII A
6. Permit Rule - Deficient Part A
Applications XVI J
7. Listing Warfarin & Zinc Phosphide I A(2)
8. Lime Stabilized Pickle Liquor Sludge .... ID
9. Exclusion of Household Waste IE
10. Interim Status Standards -
Applicability V A
11. Corrections to Test Methods Manual .... IF
12. Satellite Accumulation Standards IV A
13. Definition of Solid Wastes II A
14. Dioxin Listing and Management
Standards lit A
15. Interim Status Standards for
Treatment, Storage, and Disposal
Facilities XV E
16. Paint Filter Test VI A
17 A. Small Quantity Generators
(Superceded: See Checklist 23) IB
17 B. Delisting 1C
17 C. Household Waste IE
17 D. Waste Minimization IX A(1)&(2)
17 E. Location Standards for Salt
Domes, Salt Beds, Underground
Mines, and Caves XV A & B
17 F. Liquids in Landfills VI A; X A
17 G. Dust Suppression XV C
17 H. Double Liners XVII A; XVII B(1)t<2>&(3)
171. Ground-water Monitoring XI A & B
17 J. Cement Kilns XII A(1)&(2)
AGREV16 -9/27/94
59 IPtatwl: 12/22/941
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9641.00-21
SPA 15
I. Index to the checklist entries found iq the
Model Revision Attorney General's Statement (cont'd)
Revision checklist number/name
Subsections pertaining to checklist
17 K. Fuel Labeling XII A(2)
17 L. Corrective Action XIII A{1),(2),(3)&(4); XVI H
17 M. Pre-construction Ban XVI A
17 N. Permit Life XVI B
170. Omnibus Provision .. XVI C
17 P. Interim Status XVI D(1),{2),(3}&(4); XVI E & F
17 Q. Research & Development Permits XVI G
17 R. Hazardous Waste Exports XIV A
17 S. Exposure Information XVIII A
18. Listing of TDI, TDA, DNT I A(3)
19. Burning of Waste Fuel and Used Oil .... XX A
20. Spent Solvents Listing I A(4)
21. EDB Waste Listing I A(5)
22. Four Spent Solvents Listing I A(6)
23. Small Quantity Generators IB
24. Financial Responsibility:
Settlement Agreement XV F
25. Paint Filter Test - Correction • VI A; X A
26. Listing of Spent Pickle Liquor I A(7)
27. Corporate Guarantee - Liability
Coverage XV G
28. Hazardous Waste Storage and Tank
Systems XV H
29. Correction - Commercial Chemical
Products and Appendix VIII I A(8)
30. Biennial Reports; Correction VIII A; IX A
31. Exports of Hazardous Wastes XIV A
32. Standards for Generators - Waste '
Minimization Certifications I B; VII A; IX A(1)&(2)
33. Listing of EBDC I A(9)
34. Land Disposal Restrictions XXI A
35. Revised Manual SW-846; Amended
Incorporation by Reference IF
36. Closure/Post-closure Care for
Interim Status Surface impoundments ... XV F
37. Definition of Solid Wastes;
60
AGREV16 9/27/94
(Printed: 12/22/94)
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
I. Index to the checklist entries found in the
Model Revision Attorney General's Statement (cont'd)
Revision checklist number/name
Subsections pertaining to checklist
Technical Corrections II A
38. Amendments, Part B - Information
Requirements for Disposal Facilities .... XIII B
39. California List Waste Restrictions XXI A; XXI B
40. List (Phase I) of Hazardous
Constituents for Ground-water
Monitoring XI C
41. Identification and Listing of
Hazardous Waste I A(8)
42. Exception Reporting for Small
Quantity Generators VII B
43. Liability Requirements; Corporate
Guarantee XV G
44 A. Permit Application Requirements
Regarding Corrective Action XIII C
44 B. Corrective Action Beyond Facility
Boundary XIII D
44 C. Corrective Action for Injection Wells XIII E(1),(2)&(3)
44 D. Permit Modification XVI K
44 E. Permit as Shield Provision XVI L
44 F. Permit Conditions to Protect Human
Health and the^ Environment XVI M
44 G. Post-closure Permits XVI N
45. Hazardous Waste Miscellaneous
Units VII C; XIII F; XV F; XV I; XVI O
46. Technical Correction - Identification
and Listing of Hazardous Waste I A(8)
47. Small Quantity Generators;
Technical Correction IB
48. Farmer Exemption; Technical
Correction XIV A
49. Treatability Studies Sample
Exemption I H
50. Land Disposal Restrictions
for First Third Scheduled Wastes XXI A, B & C
51. Liability Coverage for Owners/
Operators of Treatment, Storage,
and Disposal Facilities See Revision Checklist 113
61
AGREV15 - 9/27/94
d: 12/22/94)
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
I. Index to the checklist entries found in the
Model Revision Attorney General's Statement (cont'd)
Revision checklist number/name
Subsections pertaining to checklist
52. Standards for Hazardous Waste
Storage and Treatment Tank
Systems XV H
53. identification and Listing of
Hazardous Waste; and Designation,
Reportable Quantities and
Notification I A(10); I I
54. Permit Modifications for Waste
Management Facilities XVI P
55. Statistical Methods for Evaluating
Ground-Water Monitoring Data from
Hazardous Waste Facilities XI D
56. Removal of Iron Dextran from the
Lists of Hazardous Wastes I A(11)
57. Removal of Strontium Sulfide from
the Lists of Hazardous Wastes I A(12)
58. Standards for Generators of
Hazardous Waste; Manifest
Renewal VII D
59. Hazardous Waste Miscellaneous
Units; Standards Applicable to
Owners and Operators XVI 0
60. Amendment to Requirements for
Hazardous Waste Incinerator Permits .... XVI Q
61. Changes to Interim Status Facilities
for Hazardous Waste Management
Permits; XVI R & S
Modifications of Hazardous Waste
Management Permits; XVI U
Procedures for Post-Closure
Permitting XVI T
62. Land Disposal Restrictions
Amendments to First Third
Scheduled Wastes XXI C
63. Land Disposal Restrictions for
, Second Third Scheduled Wastes XXI D & E
64. Delay of Closure Period for Hazardous
Waste Management Facilities XV J
65. Mining Waste Exclusion I I JO)
62
AQREV15-9/27/94
|Pl*n
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
I. Index to the checklist entries found in the
Model Revision Attorney General's Statement (cont'd)
Revision checklist number/name
Subsections pertaining to checklist
66. Land Disposal Restrictions; Correction
to First Third Scheduled Wastes XXI B; XXI C
67. Testing and Monitoring Activities IK
68. Reportable Quantity Adjustment Methyl
Bromide Production Waste I A(13)
69. Reportable Quantity Adjustment I A{14)
70. Changes to Part 124 Not Accounted
for by Present Checklists XVI V
71. Mining Waste Exclusion II I J(2); VII E
72. Modification of F019 Listing IA(15)
73. Testing and Monitoring Activities;
Technical Corrections IK
74. Toxicity Characteristic Revisions I L
75. Listing of 1,1 -Dimethylhydrazine
Production Wastes I A(16)
76. Criteria for Listing Toxic Wastes;
Technical Amendment I M
77. HSWA Codification Rule, Double Liners;
Correction XVII B(1)
78. Land Disposal Restrictions for
Third Third Scheduled Wastes I A(17); XXI F & G
79. Organic Air Emission Standards for
Process Vents and Equipment Leaks .... I N; XV K
80. Toxicity Characteristic; Hydrocarbon
Recovery Operations I 0
81. Petroleum Refinery Primary and
Secondary Oil/Water/Solids Separation
Sludge Listings (F037 and F038) I A(18); I P
82. Wood Preserving Listings I A(19); I Q & R; XV L; XVI W
83. Land Disposal Restrictions for Third
Third Scheduled Wastes; Technical
Amendments I A(17); XXI F & G
84 Toxicity Characteristic;
Chlorofluorocarbon Refrigerants IS
85. Burning of Hazardous Waste in Boilers
and Industrial Furnaces I T & U; II B; XVI X; XX C
86. Removal of Strontium Sulfide from the
List of Hazardous Waste; Technical
Amendment I A(12)
63
AGREV15 - 9/27/94
(Printed: 12/22/941
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9641.00-21
SPA 15
I. Index to the checklist entries found in the
Model Revision Attorney General's Statement (cont'd)
Revision checklist number/name
Subsections pertaining to checklist
87. Organic Air Emission Standards for
Process Vents and Equipment Leaks;
Technical Amendment XV K
88. Administrative Stay for K069 Listing .... I A(20)
89. Revision to F037 and F038 Listings .... I A(21)
• . *
90. Mining Exclusion III I J(2)
91. Administrative Stay for F032, F034
and F035 Listings I A(22); XV M
92. Wood Preserving Corrections I Q & R; XV L; XVI W
93. Liability Requirements; Technical
Amendments See Revision Checklist 113
94. Boilers and Industrial Furnaces
Correction/Technical Amendment I XVI X; XX C
95. Land Disposal Restrictions for
Electric Arc Furnace Dust (K061) I V & W; XXI H
96. Boilers and Industrial Furnaces
Technical Amendments II II B; XX C
97. Exports of Hazardous Waste;
Technical Correction XIV A
98. Administrative Stay for Certain
Coke Ovens XX D
99. Amendments to Interim Status
Standards for Downgradient Ground-
Water Monitoring Well Locations XI E
100. Liners and Leak Detection Systems
for Hazardous Waste Land
Disposal Units XVI Y; XVII C
101. Administrative Stay for the
Requirement that Existing Drip Pads
be Impermeable XV N
102. Second Correction to the Third
Third Land Disposal Restrictions XXI F
103. Hazardous Debris Case-by-Case
Capacity Variance XXI I
104. Used Oil Filter Exclusion IX
105. Recycled Coke By-Product Exclusion .... I Y; XX D
106. Lead-Bearing Hazardous Materials
Case-by-Case Capacity XXI J
64
AGREV15 - 9/27/94
(Prmtorf: 12/22/941
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
I. Index to the checklist entries found in the
Model Revision Attorney General's Statement (cont'd)
Revision checklist number/name
Subsections pertaining to checklist
107. Used Oil Filter Exclusion; Technical
Corrections IX
108. Toxicity Characteristic Revisions;
Technical Corrections I L
109. Land Disposal Restrictions for Newly
Listed Wastes and Hazardous Debris XXI K, L & M
110. Coke By-Products Listings I A(23); I Y
111. Burning of Hazardous Waste in Boilers
and Industrial Furnaces; Technical
Amendment III II B; XX C
112. Recycled Used Oil Management Standards XX E
113. Consolidated Liability Requirements XV 0, P & Q
114. Burning of Hazardous Waste in Boilers
and Industrial Furnaces; Technical
Amendment IV XX C
115. Chlorinated Toluenes Production
Waste Listing I A{24)
116. Hazardous Soil Case-by-Case Capacity
Variance XXI I & N
117A. Mixture and Derived-Prom Rules
Reissuance IZ
117B. Toxicity Characteristic Amendment I L
118. Liquids in Landfills II X B
119. Toxicity Characteristic Revision;
TCLP Correction I AA
120. Wood Preserving; Amendments to
Listings and Technical Requirements .... I A(22), (25) & (26); XV L, M, R, S & T
121. Corrective Action Management Units
and Temporary Units XIII G
122. Recycled Used Oil Management
Standards; Technical Amendments
and Corrections XX E
123. Land Disposal Restrictions; Renewal
of the Hazardous Waste Debris
Case-by-Case Capacity Variance XXI I & N
124. Land Disposal Restrictions for Ignitable
65
AGREV1S -9/27/94
|Print«d: 12/22/941
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
I. Index to the checklist entries found in the
Model Revision Attorney General's Statement (cont'd)
Revision checklist number/name
Subsections pertaining to checklist
and Corrosive Characteristic Wastes
Whose Treatment Standards
Were Vacated XXI 0
125. Boilers and Industrial Furnaces;
Changes for Consistency with
New Air Regulations XX F
126. Testing and Monitoring Activities I BB
127. Boilers and Industrial Furnaces;
Administrative Stay and Interim
Standards for Bevill Residues XX G
128. Wastes From the Use of Chlorophenolic
Formulations in Wood Surface Protection . I A(27);l CC
129. Revision of Conditional Exemption
for Small Scale Treatability Studies I DD
130. Recycled Used Oil Management Standards;
Technical Amendments and Corrections II XX E
131. Recordkeeping Instructions;
Technical Amendment VII F
132. Wood Surface Protection; Correction .... I CC
133. Letter of Credit Revision XV U
134. Correction of Beryllium Powder
(P015) Listing I A(28);XXI P
66
AGREV16 - 9/27/94
[Printed: 12/22/94!
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
II. Index to the non-checklist entries found in the
Model Revision Attorney General's Statement
Description
Pertinent subsections
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease
Registry, making assessment information
available to
Availability of Information
Burning and blending of hazardous waste,
RCRA §§3004(q)(2)(A) & 3004(r)(2) & (3)
exceptions
Criminal penalties for waste fuel and
used oi! fuel requirement violations .
Radioactive mixed wastes, hazardous
components of
XVIII B
XIX A(1)-(5)
Xlt B
XX B
IG
Surface Impoundments:
1. existing units subject to Subtitle C
on November 8, 1984, must comply
with new unit requirements by
November 8, 1988 or stop hazardous
waste activity; newly regulated
surface impoundments must comply
within 4 years after listing or
characteristic is promulgated
(after November 8, 1984)
2. disposal of waste prohibited from
land disposal under RCRA §3004(d),
(e) or
-------
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
Tables G-1 and G-2
The following pages (numbered 4 through 31)
should replace pages 4 through 30 of
SAM Appendix G
-------
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9641.00-21
SPA 15
TABLE G-1. LIST OF REVISION CHECKLISTS BY CLUSTER
Through June 30, 1994
StATSi' Revision
Rule Checklist
Code Number
Federal Requirement
HSWA or FR
Reference
Promul-
gation or
HSWA
Date
Non-HSWA Requirements prior to
one year
Non-HSWA Cluster 1 (January
after the promulgation date of
26, 1983- June 30, 1984;
the final rule^')
Due Date -
2
3
1 Biennial Report (See Revision Checklist
30)
2 Permit Rules; Settlement Agreement
3 Interim Status Standards; Applicability
(See Revision Checklist 10 in Non-HSWA
Cluster I)
48 FR 3977
48 FR 39611
48 FR 52718
1/28/83
9/1/83
11/22/83
4
5
6
7
8
Al
9
10
11
12
13
13.1
15
4
5
t6
t7
T8
Non-HSWA
t9
10
11
t12
13
(13^
15
Chlorinated Aliphatic Hydrocarbon Listing
(F024)
National Uniform Manifest (See Revision
Checklists 17 D & 32 in HSWA Cluster I)
Permit Rules; Settlement Agreement
Warfarin and Zinc Phosphide Listing
Lime Stabilized Pickle Liquor Sludge
Cluster 1 (July 1, 1984 - June 30 1985; Due
State Availability of Information
Household Waste
Interim Status Standards; Applicability
Corrections to Test Methods Manual
Satellite Accumulation
Definition of Solid Waste
[Definition of Solid Waste; Correction
(Included on Revision Checklist 1 3 in Non-
HSWA Cluster I)]
Interim Status Standards for Treatment,
Storage, and Disposal Facilities
49 FR 5308
49 FR 1 0490
49 FR 17716
49 FR 19922
49 FR 23284
Date- July 1, 1986^)
HSWA §3006(f)
49 FR 44978
49 FR 46094
49 FR 47390
49 FR 49568
50FR614
50 FR 14216
50 FR 16044
2/10/84
3/20/84
4/24/84
5/10/84
6/5/84
•
11/8/84
11/13/84
11/21/84
1 2/4/84
1 2/20/84
1/4/85
4/11/85
4/23/85
Continued...
LIST15 - 7/29/94 IP™** J/1/9SI
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9641.00-21
SPA 15
TABLE 6-1. LIST OF REVISION CHECKLISTS BY CLUSTER (cont'd)
Through June 30, 1994
StATS1'
Rule
Code
Revision
Checklist
Number
t •
HSWA or FR
Federal Requirement Reference
Promul-
gation or
HSWA
Date
Non-HSWA Cluster 1
1 (July 1, 1985 - June 30, 1986; Due Date - July 1, 1987^)
13.2 (13) [Definition of Solid Waste; Correction
(Included on Revision Checklist 13 in Non-
HSWA Cluster I)]
24 24 Financial Responsibility; Settlement
Agreement (See Revision Checklist 24
(Amended) in Non-HSWA Cluster VI)
26 t26 Listing of Spent Pickle Liquor (K062)
50 FR 33541
51 FR 16422
51 FR 19320
8/20/85
5/2/86
5/28/86
MW
27
Non-HSWA Cluster III (July 1, 1986 - June 30, 1987;
Radioactive Mixed Waste (See SPA 2)
t27-' Liability Coverage; Corporate Guarantee
Due Date -July 1, 1988^)
51 FR 24504
51 FR 25350
7/3/86
7/11/86
28N
29
28N.1
26.1
(See Revision Checklist 43 in Non-HSWA
Cluster IV)
28 Standards for Hazardous Waste Storage
and Treatment Tank Systems (Certain
sections superseded by 53 FR 34079, see
Revision Checklist 52 in Non-HSWA
Cluster V; also see Revision Checklist 28
in HSWA Cluster I)
29 Correction to Listing of Commercial
Chemical Products and Appendix VIII
Constituents (Completely superseded by
53 FR 13382; use Revision Checklist 46
in Non-HSWA Cluster IV to replace this
checklist)
(28) [Standards for Hazardous Waste Storage
and Treatment Tank Systems; Correction
(Included on Revision Checklist 28 in Non-
HSWA Cluster III)]
(26) [Listing of Spent Pickle Liquor; Correction
(Included on Revision Checklist 26 in Non-
HSWA Cluster II)]
51 FR 28296
51 FR 29430
51 FR33612
51 FR 25422 7/14/86
8/6/86
8/15/86
9/23
Continued...
LIST1S - 7/29/94 l*«»* 2/i/ssi
-------
. OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
TABLE G-1. LIST OF REVISION CHECKLISTS BY CLUSTER (cont'd)
Through June 30, 1994
StATSi'
Rule
Code
35
36
37
38
40
41
26.2
Revision
Checklist
Number
35
36
37
38
Non-HSWA
40
41
• (26)
^*
Federal Requirement
Revised Manual SW-846; Amended
Incorporation by Reference
Closure/Post-Closure Care for Interim
Status Surface Impoundments
Definition of Solid Waste; Technical
Corrections
Amendments to Part B information
Requirements for Land Disposal Facilities
Cluster IV (July 1, 1987 - June 30, 1988; Due
List (Phase 1 ) of Hazardous Constituents
for Ground-water Monitoring
Identification and Listing of Hazardous
Waste
[Spent Pickle Liquor from Steel Finishing
HSWA or FR
Reference
52 FR 8072
52 FR 8704
52 FR 21 306
52 FR 23447
Date- July 1, 1989^)
52 FR 25942
52 FR 2601 2
52 FR 28697
Promul-
gation or
HSWA
Date
3/1 6/87
3/19/87
6/5/87
6/22/87
7/9/87
7/10/87
8/3/87
Operations (See footnote 1, Revision
Checklist 26 in Non-HSWA Cluster II)]
38.1 (38) (Development of Corrective Action
Programs After Permitting Hazardous
Waste Land Disposal Facilities;
Corrections (Included on Revision
Checklist 38 in Non-HSWA Cluster 111)1
43 143^' Liability Requirements for Hazardous
Waste Facilities; Corporate Guarantee
(See Revision Checklist 27 in Non-HSWA
Cluster 111)
45 45 Hazardous Waste Miscellaneous Units
(See Revision Checklist 59 in Non-HSWA
V for technical corrections)
24.1 (24) [Standards Applicable to Owners and
Operators of Hazardous Waste Treatment,
Storage, and Disposal Facilities;
Closure/Post-Closure and Financial
Responsibility Requirements (Included on
Revision Checklist 24 in Non-HSWA
Cluster II)]
52 FR 33936
9/9/87
52 FR 44314 11/18/87
52 FR 46946 12/10/87
53 FR 7740
3/10/88
6
Continued...
LIST1S • 7/29/94 IfVnM: 2/1/951
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9641.00-21
SPA 15
TABLE G-1. LIST OF REVISION CHECKLISTS BY CLUSTER (cont'd)
Through June 30, 1994
StATS*'
Rule
Code
46
Revision
Checklist
Number
46
Non-HSWA
- /
Federal Requirement
Technical Correction; Identification and
Listing of Hazardous Waste (Entirely
supersedes Revision Checklist 29 in Non-
HSWA Cluster III)
Cluster V (July 1 , 1 988 - June 30, 1989; Due
HSWA or FR
Reference
53 FR 13382
Date- July 1, 1990^)
w
Promul-
gation or
HSWA
Date
4/22/88
49
52N
53
54
55
54.1
56
57
T49 Identification and Listing of Hazardous
Waste; Treatability Studies Sample
Exemption
See Revision Checklist 113, Consolidated
Liability Requirements, in RCRA Cluster III
(formerly withheld Revision Checklist 51)
52 Hazardous Waste Management System;
Standards for Hazardous Waste Storage
and Treatment Tank Systems (Supersedes
certain portions of Revision Checklist 28
in Non-HSWA Cluster III; also see Revision
Checklist 52 in HSWA Cluster II)
53 Identification and Listing of Hazardous
Waste; and Designation, Reportable
Quantities, and Notification
t54 Permit Modifications for Hazardous Waste
Management Facilities
55 Statistical Methods for Evaluating Ground-
Water Monitoring Data from Hazardous
Waste Facilities
(54) [Permit Modifications for Hazardous
Waste Management Facilities (Included on
Revision Checklist 54 in Non-HSWA
Cluster V)]
T56 Identification and Listing of Hazardous
Waste; Removal of Iron Dextran from the
List of Hazardous Wastes
t57 Identification and Listing of Hazardous
Waste; Removal of Strontium Sulfide from
the List of Hazardous Wastes
53 FR 27290
53 FR 33938
53 FR 34079
53 FR 35412
53 FR37912
53 FR 39720
7/19/88
9/1/88
9/2/88
9/13/88
9/28/88
10/11/88
53 FR 41649 10/24/88
53 FR 43878 10/31/88
53 FR 43881 10/31/88
Continued...
LIST15 - 7/29/94 iPrra* 2/i'Ml
-------
60
61
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
TABLE G-1. LIST OF REVISION CHECKLISTS BY CLUSTER (cont'd)
Through June 30, 1994
StATS1'
Rule
Code
58
59
Revision
Checklist
Number
T58
59
„•
Federal Requirement
Standards for Generators of Hazardous
Waste; Manifest Renewal
Hazardous Waste Miscellaneous Units;
Standards Applicable to Owners and
Operators (Technical correction to
Revision Checklist 45 in Non-HSWA
Cluster IV)
HSWA or FR
Reference
53 FR 45089
54 FR615
Promul-
gation or
HSWA
Date
11/8/88
1 /9/89
60 Amendment to Requirements for
Hazardous Waste incinerator Permits
t61 Changes to Interim Status Facilities for
Hazardous Waste Management Permits;
Modifications of Hazardous Waste
Management Permits; Procedures for
Post-Closure Permitting
54 PR 4286 1 /30/89
54 FR 9596 3/7/89
Non-HSWA Cluster VI
(July
1.
1989
- June
30.
1990;
Due
Date
-July
1.
19912/}
64
65
67
70^
65
67
70
(70)
Delay of Closure Period for Hazardous
Waste Management Facilities
Mining Waste Exclusion I
Testing and Monitoring Activities
Changes to Part 1 24 Not Accounted for .
by Present Checklists
Environmental Permit Regulations; RCRA
Hazardous Waste; SDWA Underground
Injection Control; CWA National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System; CWA
Section 404 Dredge or Fill Programs; and
CAA Prevention of Significant
Deterioration (See Revision Checklist 70 in
Non-HSWA Cluster VI)
54 FR 33376 8/14/89
54 FR 36592
54 FR 40260
48 FR 14146
9/1/89
9/29/89
4/1/83
8
Continued..
LIST15 - 7/29/94 (ftm* 3/i/s«
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA IS
TABLE 0-1. LIST OF REVISION CHECKLISTS BY CLUSTER (cont'dj
Through June 30, 1994
StATSi'
Rule
Code
Revision
Checklist
Number Federal Requirement
HSWA or EB
Reference
VJP
Promul-
gation or
HSWA
Date
24A
71
72
73
76
(70) Hazardous Waste Management System;
Permit Program; Requirements for
Authorization of State Programs;
Procedures for Decisionmaking;
Identification and Listing of Hazardous
Waste; Standards for Owners and
Operators of Hazardous Waste Storage,
Treatment, and Disposal Facilities; Interim
Status Standards for Owners and
Operators of Hazardous Waste Storage.
Treatment, and Disposal Facilities;
Correction (See Revision Checklist 70 in
Non-HSWA Cluster VI)
(70) Underground Injection Control Program;
Hazardous Waste Disposal Injection
Restrictions; Amendments to Technical
Requirements for Class I Hazardous Waste
Injection Wells; and Additional Monitoring
Requirements Applicable to All Class I
Wells (See Revision Checklist 70 in Non-
HSWA Cluster VI)
(70) Safe Drinking Water Act; National
Drinking Water Regulations; Underground
Injection Control Regulations; Indian Lands
(See Revision Checklist 70 in Non-HSWA
Cluster VI)
(70) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System Permit Regulations (See Revision
Checklist 70 in Non-HSWA Cluster VI)
24Z/ Financial Responsibility; Settlement
(Amended) Agreement; Correction (See Revision
Checklist 64 and footnote 4 of this table)
71 Mining Waste Exclusion II
T72 Modifications of F019 Listing
73 Testing and Monitoring Activities;
Technical Corrections
t76 Criteria for Listing Toxic Wastes;
•Technical Amendment
48 FR 30113
6/30/83
53 FR 28118 7/26/88
53 FR 37396 9/26/88
54 FR 246 1/4/89
55 FR 25976 6/26/90
55 FR 2322 1/23/90
55 FR 5340 2/14/90
55 FR 8948 3/9/90
55 FR 18726 5/4/90
Continue?..
LIST15 • 7/28/94 iPrnM: 2/t/Ml
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
TABLE G-1. LIST OF REVISION CHECKLISTS BY CLUSTER (cont'd)
Through June 30, 1994
StATS*'
Rule
Cod*
78N
Revision
Checklist
Number
78*'
-—
^ t
Federal Requirement
Land Disposal Restrictions for Third
Third Scheduled Wastes (See Revision
Checklist 78 in HSWA Cluster II)
HSWA Cluster I (November 8, 1984 - June 30, 1987;
HSWA or FR
Reference
55 FR 22520
Due Date - July 1 , 1 9892/)
Promul-
gation or
HSWA
Date
6/1/90
HSWA Cluster 1 (November 8, 1984 - June 30, 1987; Due
SR1
SR2
BB
t
t
Existing and newly regulated
surface impoundments
Variance under §3005(j)(2)-(9) and (13)
Exceptions to the Burning and Blending of
Date- July 1, 19892/)
HSWA
§3005(j)(1)&(6)
HSWA §3005(j)(2)-
(9)
HSWA
CP
NOT DELEGABLE*'
14 14
16
16
Hazardous Waste
Hazardous and Used Oil Fuel Criminal
Penalties
HSWA Date of Enactment Provisions (See
Revision Checklists 17 A - S in HSWA
Cluster I)
Direct Action Against Insurers
Dioxin Waste Listing and Management
Standards
Fuel Labeling (See Revision Checklist 17 K
in HSWA Cluster I)
Paint Filter Test (See Revision Checklist
25 in HSWA Cluster I)
Prohibition of Liquids in Landfills (See
Revision Checklist 17 F in HSWA Cluster
I)
Expansions During Interim Status - Waste
Piles (See Revision Checklist 17 P in
HSWA Cluster I)
Expansions During Interim Status -
Landfills and Surface Impoundments (See
Revision Checklist 17 P in HSWA
Cluster I)
10
§3004(q)(2)(A)
§3004
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
TABLE G-1. LIST OF REVISION CHECKLISTS BY CLUSTER (cont'd)
Through June 30, 1994
StATS*'
Rule
Code
Revision
Checklist
Number Federal Requirement
HSWA or FJL
Reference
Promul-
gation or
HSWA
Date
SI
17A
17B
17C
17D
17E
17F
17G
17H
171
17J
17K
17L
17M
17N
17O
17P
17Q
17R
17S
Sharing of Information With the Agency
for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
17 HSWA Codification Rule (See Revision
Checklist 44 in HSWA Cluster II)
17 A - Small Quantity Generators
(Superseded by 51 PR 10146, see
Revision Checklist 23 in HSWA
Cluster I)
t 17 B- Deiisting
t 17 C - Household Waste
17 D - Waste Minimization (See Revision
Checklist 32 in HSWA Cluster I)
17 E - Location Standards for Salt
Domes, Salt Beds, Underground
Mines and Caves
17 F - Liquids in Landfills (See Revision
Checklist 25 in HSWA Cluster I)
17 G - Dust Suppression
17 H - Double Liners
17 I - Ground-Water Monitoring
17 J - Cement Kilns
17 K - Fuel Labeling (Superseded by 51
FR 49164, see Revision Checklist
19 in HSWA Cluster I)
17 L - Corrective Action
17 M - Pre-construction Ban
17 N- Permit Life
17 0 - Omnibus Provision
t 17 P- Interim Status
17 Q - Research anfi Development
Permits
17 R - Hazardous Waste Exports
(Superseded by 51 FR 28644, see
Revision Checklist 31 in HSWA
Cluster I)
17 S - Exposure Information
HSWA §3019(b) 7/15/85
50 FR 28702 7/15/85
18
18
Listing of TDl, TDA, DMT
50 FR 42936 10/23/85
Continued,.
11
LIST15 - 7/29/94
-------
25
28H
30
31
28H.1
32
33
34
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
TABLE 6-1. LIST OF REVISION CHECKLISTS BY CLUSTER (cont'd)
Through June 30, 1994
StATS*'
Rule
Code
19
20
20.1
21
22
23
Revision
Checklist
Number
19
20
(20)
21
22
23
, *•
Federal Requirement
Burning of Waste Fuel and Used Oil Fuel
in Boilers and Industrial Furnaces
Listing of Spent Solvents
[Listing of Spent Solvents; Correction
(Included on Revision Checklist 20)}
Listing of EDB Waste
Listing of Four Spent Solvents
Generators of 1 00 to 1 000 kg Hazardous
HSWA or FR
Reference
50 FR49164
50 FR53315
51 FR 2702
51 FR 5327
51 FR 6537
51 FR 10146
Promul-
gation or
HSWA
Date
11/29/85
12/31/85
1/21/86
2/13/86
2/25/86
3/24/86
Waste (See Revision Checklists 42 and 47
in HSWA Cluster II)
25 Codification Rule; Technical Correction
(Paint Filter Test)
28 Standards for Hazardous Waste Storage
and Treatment Tank Systems (Certain
sections superseded by 53 FR 34079, see
Revision Checklist 52 in HSWA Cluster II;
also see Revision Checklist 28 in Non-
HSWA Cluster HI)
30 Biennial Report; Correction
31 Exports of Hazardous Waste (See Revision
Checklist 48 in HSWA Cluster II)
(28) [Standards for Hazardous Waste Storage
and Tank Systems; Corrections (See
Revision Checklist 28 in HSWA Cluster I)]
32 Standards for Generators; Waste
Minimization Certifications
33 Listing of EBDC
34 Land Disposal Restrictions (Certain
sections superseded by 52 FR 25760 and
53 FR 31138, see Revision Checklists 39
& 50 in HSWA Cluster II, and SPAs 4
&6)
51 FR 19176 5/28/86
51 FR 25422 7/14/86
51 FR 28556 8/8/86
51 FR 28664 8/8/86
51FR29430 8/15/86
51 FR35190 10/1/86
51 FR 37725 10/24/86
51 FR 40572 11/7/86
12
Continued.,,
LIST15 - 7/29/94 wm*. 2/1/9SI
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
TABLE G-1. LIST OF REVISION CHECKLISTS BY CLUSTER (cont'd)
Through June 30, 1994
*
StATS1'
Rule
Code
Revision
Checklist
Number Federal Requirement
HSWA or FR
Reference
Promul-
gation or
HSWA
Date
19.1 (19) [Burning of Waste Fuel and Used Oil Fuel
in Boilers and Industrial Furnaces;
Technical Corrections (Included on
Revision Checklist 19 in HSWA Cluster I)]
34.1 (34) (Land Disposal Restrictions; Corrections
(Included on Revision Checklist 34 in
HSWA Cluster I)}
17B.1 (17 B) [Hazardous Waste Management System:
Requirements of Rulemaking Petitions
(Included on Revision Checklist 17 B in
HSWA Cluster I)]
52 FR 11819 4/13/87
52 FR 21010 6/4/87
54 FR 27114 6/27/89
HSWA Cluster II (July 1, 1987 - June 30, 1990; Due Date • July 1, 1991 i)
39
42
39.1
44A
44B
44C
44D
44E
39 California List Waste Restrictions (See
Revision Checklist 34 and SPA 4; certain
sections superseded by 53 FR 31138, see
Revision Checklist 50, in HSWA Cluster II,
and SPA 6)
42 Exception Reporting for Small Quantity
Generators of Hazardous Waste (See
Checklist 23 in HSWA Cluster I)
(39) [Test Methods for Hazardous Waste
covered by the Land Disposal Restrictions
(Included on Revision Checklist 39 in
HSWA Cluster II)]
44 HSWA Codification Rule 2 (See Revision
Checklist 17 in HSWA Cluster I)
44 A - Permit Application Requirements
Regarding Corrective Action
44 B - Corrective Action Beyond Facility
Boundary
44 C - Corrective Action for Injection
Wells
44 D - Permit Modification
44 E - Permit as a Shield Provision
52 FR 25760
52 FR 35894
52 FR 45788
7/8/87
9/23/87
52 FR 41295 10/27/87
12/1/87
13
Continu
irunoT..
LIST16 - 7/29/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
TABLE G-1. LIST OF REVISION CHECKLISTS BY CLUSTER (cont'd)
Through June 30, 1994
StATS*'
Rule
Code
44F
44G
47
Revision
Checklist
Number
47
!.. * •
Federal Requirement
44 F - Permit Conditions to Protect
Human Health and the Environment
44 G - Post-Closure Permits
Identification and Listing of Hazardous
HSWA or FR
Reference
53 FR27162
Promul-
gation or
HSWA
Date
7/19/88
48
50
52H
50.1
62
63
66
68
69
74
75
Waste; Technical Correction (Corrects
Revision Checklist 23 in HSWA Cluster I)
48 Farmer Exemptions; Technical Corrections
(Corrects Revision Checklist 31 in HSWA
Cluster I)
50 Land Disposal Restrictions for First Third
Scheduled Wastes (See Revision Checklist
62 in HSWA Cluster II)
52 Hazardous Waste Management System;
Standards for Hazardous Waste Storage
and Treatment Tank Systems (Supersedes
certain portions of Revision Checklist 28
in HSWA Cluster I; also see Revision
Checklist 52 in Non-HSWA Cluster V)
(50) {Land Disposal Restrictions (Included on
Revision Checklist 50 jn HSWA Cluster II)]
62 Land Disposal Restriction Amendments to
First Third Scheduled Wastes (amends
portions of Revision Checklist 50 in
HSWA Cluster II)
63 Land Disposal Restrictions for Second
Third Scheduled Wastes
66 Land Disposal Restrictions; Correction to
the First Third Scheduled Wastes
68 Reportable Quantity Adjustment Methyl
Bromide Production Wastes
69 Reportable Quantity Adjustment
74 Toxicity Characteristic Revisions
75 Listing of 1,1-Dimethylhydrazine
Production Wastes
53 FR 27164 7/19/88
53 FR 31138 8/17/88
53 FR 34079 9/2/88
54 FR 8264 2/27/89
54 FR 18836 5/2/89
54 FR 26594 6/23/89
54 FR 36967 9/6/89
54 FR 41402 10/6/89
54 FR 50968 12/11/89
55 FR 11798 3/29/90
55 FR 18496 5/2/90
14
Continued...
UST1S - 7/29/94 IPT«M
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9641.00-21
SPA IS
TABLE G-1. LIST OF REVISION CHECKLISTS BY CLUSTER (cont'd)
Through June 30, 1994
StATS1'
Rule
Code
77
78H
Revision "
Checklist
Number Federal Requirement
77 HSWA Codification Rule; Double Liners;
Correction
78-' Land Disposal Restrictions for Third
Third Scheduled Wastes (See Revision
Checklist 78 in Non-HSWA Cluster VI)
HSWA or EB
Reference
55 FR 19262
55 FR 22520
Promul-
gation or
HSWA
Date
5/9/90
6/1/90
66.1
79
74.1
82
81.1
83
80.1
(66) [Land Disposal Restrictions; Correction
(Included on Revision Checklist 66 in
HSWA Cluster II)]
79 Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage,
and Disposal Facilities-Organic
Air Emission Standards For Process
Vents and Equipment Leaks (See Revision
Checklist 87 in RCRA Cluster I)
(74) [Toxicity Characteristics Revisions;
Correction (Included on Revision Checklist
74 in HSWA Cluster II)]
55 FR 23935 6/13/90
55 FR 25454 6/21/90
55 FR 26986 6/29/90
Oil/Water/Solids Separation Sludge
Listings (F037 and F038) (See Revision
Checklist 81) (HSWA)
82 Wood Preserving Listings (HSWA/Non-
HSWA)
(81) [Petroleum Refinery Primary and
Secondary Oil/Water/Solids Separation
Sludge Listings; Correction (Included on
Revision Checklist 81, RCRA Cluster I)]
83 Land Disposal Restrictions for Third
Third Scheduled Wastes; Technical
Amendment (HSWA)
(80) [Toxicity Characteristic; Hydrocarbon
Recovery Operations (Included on Revision
Checklist 80 in RCRA Cluster I)]
15
55 FR 50450
55 FR 51707
56 FR 3864
56 FR 3978
RCRA Cluster 1 (July 1, 1990.- June 30, 1991; Due Date
80
81
T80
81
Toxicity Characteristic; Hydrocarbon
Recovery Operations (HSWA)
Petroleum Refinery Primary and Secondary
-July 1 1992^)
55 FR 40834
55 FR 46354
|
10/5/90
11/2/90
12/6/90
12/17/90
1/31/91
2/01/91
Continued
LIST 15 - 7/29/94 |ftm«d:
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9641.00-21
SPA 15
TABLE G-1. LIST OF REVISION CHECKLISTS BY CLUSTER (cont'd)
Through June 30, 1994
StATS1'
Rule
Code
Revision
Checklist
Number Federal Requirement
HSWA or FR
Reference
Promul-
gation or
HSWA
Date
84 T84 Toxicity Characteristic; Chlorofluoro-
carbon Refrigerants (HSWA)
85 85 Burning of Hazardous Waste in Boilers and
Industrial Furnaces (HSWA/Non-HSWA)
86 86s' Removal of Strontium Sulfide From the
List of Hazardous Waste; Technical
Amendment (Non-HSWA)
80.2 (80) [Toxicity Characteristic; Hydrocarbon
Recovery Operations (See Revision
Checklist 80 in RCRA Cluster I)]
87 87 Organic Air Emission Standards for
Process Vents and Equipment Leaks;
Technical Amendment (See Revision
Checklist 79 in HSWA Cluster II) (HSWA)
88 t88 Administrative Stay for K069 Listing (Non-
HSWA)
89 t89 Revision to F037 and F038 Listings (See
Revision Checklist 81 in RCRA Cluster I)
(HSWA)
90 90 Mining Exclusion III (Non-HSWA)
91 t91 Administrative Stay for F032, F034, and
F035 Listings (HSWA/Non-HSWA)
56 FR 5910 2/13/91
56 FR 7134 2/21/91
56 FR 7567 2/25/91
56 FR 13406 4/02/91
56 FR 19290 4/26/91
56 FR 19951 5/01/91
56 FR 21955 5/13/91
56 FR 27300 6/13/91
56 FR 27332 6/13/91
92
RCRA Cluster II (July 1 , 1 991 - June 30, 1 992; Due Date
92 Wood Preserving Listings; Technical
Corrections (HSWA/Non-HSWA)
See Revision Checklist 1 1 3, Consolidated
-July 1. 19931')
56 FR 301 92
56 FR 30200
7/01/91
7/01/91
94
95
Liability Requirements, in RCRA Cluster 111
(formerly withheld Revision Checklist 93)
94 Burning of Hazardous Waste in Boilers and
industrial Furnaces; Corrections and
Technical Amendments I (HSWA/Non-
HSWA)
95 Land Disposal Restrictions for Electric Arc
Furnace Dust (K061) (HSWA)
16
56 FR 32688
56 FR 41164
7/17/91
8/19/91
Continued...
LIST1S - 7/29/94 iPrxM: 2ni9S\
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9641.00-21
SPA 15
TABLE G-1- LIST OF REVISION CHECKLISTS BY CLUSTER (cont'd)
,. Through June 30, 1994
StATSi'
Rule
Code
Revision
Checklist
Number Federal Requirement
HSWA or EB
Reference
Promul-
gation or
HSWA
Date
96 96 Burning of Hazardous Waste in Boilers and
Industrial Furnaces; Technical
Amendments II (HSWA/Non-HSWA)
97 97 Exports of Hazardous Waste; Technical
Correction (HSWA)
98 t98 Coke Ovens Administrative Stay (HSWA)
99 T99 Amendments to Interim Status Standards
for Downgradient Ground-Water
Monitoring Well Locations (Non-HSWA)
100 100 Liners and Leak Detection Systems for
Hazardous Waste Land Disposal Units
(HSWA/Non-HSWA)
101 t101 Administrative Stay for the Requirement
That Existing Drip Pads be Impermeable
(HSWA/Non-HSWA)
102 102 Second Correction to the Third Third Land
Disposal Restrictions (HSWA)
103 103 Hazardous Debris Case-by-Case Capacity
Variance (HSWA)
104 t104 Oil Filter Exclusion (HSWA)
105 t105 Recycled Coke By-Product Exclusion
(HSWA)
106 106 Lead-Bearing Hazardous Materials Case-
by-Case Capacity Variance (HSWA)
56 PR 42504 8/27/91
56 FR 43704 9/04/91
56 FR 43874 9/05/91
56 FR 66365 12/23/91
57 FR 3462 1/29/92
57 FR 5859 2/18/92
57 FR 8086 3/O
57 FR 20766 5/15/92
57 FR 21 524 5/20/92
57 FR 27880 6/22/92
57 FR 28628 6/26/92
RCRA Cluster III (July 1, 1992 - June 30, 1993; Due Date - July 1, 1994*')
107 T107 Used Oil Filter Exclusion Corrections
(HSWA)
108 108 Toxicity Characteristic Revisions (HSWA)
109 109 Land Disposal Restrictions for Newly
Listed Waste and Hazardous Debris
(HSWA)
110 110 Coke-By-Products Listings (HSWA)
17
57 FB 29220 7/01/92
57 FB 30657
57 FR 37194
7/10/92
8/18/92
57 FR 37284 8/18/92
Continued...
LIST16 - 7/29/94 I**** 2/1/9SI
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9641.00-21
SPA 15
TABLE G-1. LIST OF REVISION CHECKLISTS BY CLUSTER (cont'd)
Through June 30, 1994
StATSi'
Rule
Code
111
112
113
113.1
113.2
114
115
116
117A
117A.1
117A.2
Revision
Checklist
Number
111
112
113
(113)
(113)
(113)
114
115
116
t117 A
(117 A)
(117 A)
(117 A)
.,*
Federal Requirement
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces; Technical
Amendment III (HSWA/Non-HSWA)
Recycled Used Oil Management Standards
(HSWA/Non-HSWA)
Consolidated Liability Requirements:
Financial Responsibility for Third-Party
Liability, Closure, and Post-Closure (Non-
HSWA)
Liability Coverage (Non-HSWA) (formerly
withheld Revision Checklist 51)
Liability Requirements; Technical
Amendment (Non-HSWA) (formerly
withheld Revision Checklist 93)
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces; Technical
Amendment IV (HSWA/Non-HSWA)
Chlorinated Toluenes Production Waste
Listing (HSWA)
Hazardous Soil Case-by-Case Capacity
Variance (HSWA)
Reissuance of the "Mixture" and "Derived-
From" Rules (Non-HSWA/HSWA)
"Mixture" and "Derived-From" Rules;
Response to Court Remand
"Mixture" and "Derived-From" Rules;
Technical Correction
"Mixture" and "Derived-From" Rules; Final
HSWA or FR
Reference
57 FR 38558
57 FR 41 566
57 FR 42832
53 FR 33938
56 FR 30200
57 FR 44999
57 FR 47376
57 FR 47772
57 FR 7628
57 FR 23062
57 FR 49278
Promul-
gation or
HSWA
Date
8/25/92
9/10/92
9/16/92
9/1/88
7/1/91
9/30/92
10/15/92
10/20/92
3/3/92
6/1/92
10/20/92
Rule
117B 117B Toxicity Characteristic Amendment
(HSWA)
57 FR 23062
6/1/92
18
Continued...
LIST1 i - 7/29/94 IPnnud: 2/1/951
-------
TABLE
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9641.00-21
SPA 15
G-1. LIST OF REVISION CHECKLISTS BY CLUSTER (cont'd)
Through June 30, 1994
m
StATSi'
Rule
Code
118
119
Revision
Checklist
Number
118
T119
Federal Requirement
Liquids in Landfills II (HSWA)
Toxicity Characteristic Revision; TCLP
HSWA or EB
Reference
57 FR 54452
57 FR 551 14
Promul-
gation or
HSWA
Date
11/18/92
11/24/92
Correction (HSWA)
120 120 Wood Preserving; Amendments to Listings
' and Technical Requirements (HSWA/Non-
HSWA)
119.1 t(119)& [Toxicity Characteristic Revision; TCLP
Correction (included on Revision Checklist
119 in RCRA Cluster III)]
121 1121 Corrective Action Management Units and
Temporary Units (HSWA)
122 122 Recycled Used Oil Management
Standards; Technical Amendments and
Corrections (HSWA/Non-HSWA)
123 123 Land Disposal Restrictions; Renewal of
the Hazardous Waste Debris Case-by-Case
Capacity Variance (HSWA)
124 124 Land Disposal Restrictions for Ignitable
and Corrosive Characteristic Wastes
Whose Treatment Standards Were
Vacated (HSWA)
122.1 (122) [Recycled Used Oil Management
Standards; Correction (Included on
Revision Checklist 122 in RCRA Cluster
III)
57 FR 61492 12/24/92
58 FR 6854 2/2/93
58 FR 8658 2/16/93
58 FR 26420 5/3/93
58 FR 28506 5/14/93
58 FR 29860 5/24/93
58 FR 33341 6/17/93
RCRA Cluster IV (July 1, 1993 - June 30, 1994; Due Date - July 1, 1995^)
125 125 Boilers and Industrial Furnaces; Changes
for Consistency with New Air Regulations
(HSWA/Non-HSWA)
126 126 Testing and Monitoring Activities
(HSWA/Non-HSWA)
T127 127 Boilers and Industrial Furnaces;
Administrative Stay and Interim Standards
for Bevill Residues (HSWA)
19
58 FR 38816 7/20/93
58 FR 46040 8/31/93
58 FR 59598 11/9/93
Continuv^^^
LIST15 - 7/29/94 iPrira*
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
TABLE G-1. LIST OF REVISION CHECKLISTS BY CLUSTER (confd)
Through June 30, 1994
StATS*'
Rule
Code
Revision '
Checklist
Number Federal Requirement
•
HSWA or FR
Reference
Promul-
gation or
HSWA
Date
128
t129
130
131
132
T133
134
128 Wastes From the Use of Chlorophenolic
Formulations in Wood Surface Protection
(Non-HSWA)
129 Revision of Conditional Exemption for
Small Scale Treatability Studies (Non-
HSWA)
130 Recycled Used Oil Management
Standards; Technical Amendments and
Corrections II (HSWA/Non-HSWA)
131 Recordkeeping Instructions; Technical
Amendment {Non-HSWA)
132 Wood Surface Protection; Correction
(Non-HSWA)
133 Letter of Credit Revision (Non-HSWA)
134 Correction of Beryllium Powder (P015)
Listing (Non-HSWA)
59 FR 458
1/4/94
59 FR 8362 2/18/94
59 FR 10550
3/04/94
59 FR 13891 3/24/94
59 FR 28484 6/02/94
59 FR 29958 6/10/94
59 FR 31551 6/20/94
t Optional.
1StATS is the State Authorization Tracking System which tracks States' progress in becoming
authorized for each checklist. This column was added to help the Regions and States relate data entered
in that system with the information included in this table. The "rule code" is the symbol used in StATS to
represent a particular rule or non-checklist item, e.g.. State Availability of Information or Radioactive Mixed
Waste.
2States have an additional year if statutory changes are required.
3A parenthesized number implies that this is noj; the main rule for the indicated checklist. However,
the rule is included on the indicated checklist. Rules with parenthesized numbers are typically technical
corrections or amendments to a major final rule. These corrections are usually close enough in time to the
initial final rule that the correction was included on the checklist for the initial rule, rather than developing
a new checklist for the correction.
4While Revision Checklists 27 and 43 are optional. States which have adopted or choose to adopt the
changes addressed by Revision Checklist 27 must adopt Revision Checklist 43's changes.
5The May 2, 1986 amendments to 40 CFR 264.113 and 265.113, addressed by Revision Checklist
24, must be adopted before or simultaneous with adopting the provisions addressed by Revision Checklist
64. Also see Footnote 7.
20
Continued...
LIST1S - 7/29/94 IPrmoo: 2/1/951
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
TABLE G-1. LIST OF REVISION CHECKLISTS BY CLUSTER (confd)
Through June 30, 1994
iS^TO
8Note that, unlike other checklists which address more than one 'final rule, Revision Checklist 70
presented by each of these rules individually in StATS. Instead, it is represented only once as Revision
Checklist 70. This checklist is different from other checklists because it represents an accumulation of
small changes to Part 124, relating to the RCRA program, which were missed because they were often
presented as relating to other permit programs. Effectively, this checklist is a "catch-up" checklist, with
the many rules it represents spanning a six-year period from 1983 to 1989. To simplify an already
complicated and confusing matter, it was decided to only represent this checklist as one entry, rather than
five separate entries.
70nly those sections, i.e., 40 CFR 264.113 and 265.113, of Revision Checklist 24 (Amended)
recharacterized as more stringent by the June 26, 1990 correction are included in Non-HSWA Cluster VI.
All other Revision Checklist 24 provisions continue to be included in Non-HSWA Cluster II. States which
have already adopted the 264.113 and 265.113 amendments as part of their authorization for Revision
Checklist 24 in Non-HSWA Cluster II, are not affected by this correction and do not have to submit an
amended Revision Checklist 24.
Revision Checklist 78 is in HSWA Cluster II, with the exception of the clarifying amendment to
§268.33(c) which is in Non-HSWA Cluster VI. This clarification is not immediately effective in authorized
States since the requirements are not imposed pursuant to HSWA. Thus, these requirements are
applicable only in those States that do not have interim or final authorization. In authorized States, the
requirements will not be applicable until the State revises its program to adopt equivalent requirements
under State law.
9The rule addressed by this checklist is a technical amendment to the final rule (53 FR 43881; Oct
31, 1988; Revision Checklist 57)) that removed strontium sulfide from 40 CFR 261.33, the list of
commercial chemical products which are hazardous wastes when discarded or intended to be discards
States which intend to remove strontium sulfide from their hazardous wastes lists, but have not yet
adopted the changes made by Revision Checklist 57 are strongly encouraged to adopt the changes
addressed by Revision Checklists 57 and 86 at the same time. Those States that have already adopted
the Revision Checklist 57 provisions should adopt that Revision Checklist 86 amendments as soon as
possible. States should note that Revision Checklist 86 is a conditionally optional checklist. States
choosing not to adopt the removal of strontium sulfide (i.e. Revision Checklist 57) should not adopt the
Revision Checklist 86 provisions. However, States which choose to remove strontium sulfide must adopt
the provisions addressed by Revision checklist 86 to be sure that the material has been properly removed
from the State's lists and appendices.
"Direct Action against insurers in RCRA §3004(t) is not delegable to the States. EPA realizes that six
States are currently "authorized" for this provision. Several States have included this provision in their
pending HSWA I revision applications. The Regions should review these provisions and clarify with their
States that, by virtue of the statute, the Federal cause of action ensured by RCRA §3004(t) remains in
effect in authorized States. This provision is not delegable because authorized provisions of State law
must operate in lieu of the Federal counterpart and, in this situation, State law providing for a direct cause
of action against insurers may augment the Federal Action, but not supersede it.
11 This is a conditionally optional rule; if a State chooses to adopt the November 24, 1992 (57 FR
55114) rule, it must make this change.
21
LIST14 - 7/30/93
Z/1/9SI
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
TABLE G-2. NUMERICAL LISTING OF REVISION CHECKLISTS
AND CORRESPONDING CLUSTER
Through June 30, 1993
Revision
Checklist
Number
Federal Requirement
Cluster
State Availability of Information (See Appendix N)
Radioactive Mixed Waste (See SPA 2 and
Appendix N)
NOT Direct Action Against Insurers
DELEGABLEl'
Surface Impoundment Requirements:
a. Existing and newly regulated
surface impoundments
t b. Variance under §3005(j)(2)-(9)
and (13)
Sharing of Information With the Agency for Toxic
Substances and Disease Registry
t Exceptions to the Burning and Blending of
Hazardous Waste
t
1
2
3
4
5
T6
t7
t8
t9
Hazardous and Used Oil Fuel Criminal Penalties
Biennial Report
Permit Rules - Settlement Agreement
Interim Status Standards - Applicability
Chlorinated Aliphatic Hydrocarbon Listing (F024)
National Uniform Manifest
Permit Rules: Settlement Agreement
Warfarin & Zinc Phosphide Listing
Lime Stabilized Pickle Liquor Sludge
Household Waste
22
Non-HSWA Cluster I
Non-HSWA Cluster II
HSWA Cluster I
HSWA Cluster I
HSWA Cluster
HSWA Cluster I
HSWA Cluster I
Non-HSWA Requirements Prior to
Non-HSWA Cluster I
Non-HSWA Requirements Prior to
Non-HSWA Cluster I
Non-HSWA Requirements Prior to
Non-HSWA Cluster I
Non-HSWA Requirements Prior to
Non-HSWA Cluster I
Non-HSWA Requirements Prior to
Non-HSWA Cluster I
Non-HSWA Requirements Prior to
Non-HSWA Cluster I
Non-HSWA Requirements Prior to
Non-HSWA Cluster I
Non-HSWA Requirements Prior to
Non-HSWA Cluster I
Non-HSWA Cluster I
Continued...
LIST14 - 7/30/93 IPMW*: 2/1/SS1
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00*21
SPA 15
TABLE G-2. NUMERICAL LISTING OF REVISION CHECKLISTS
AND CORRESPONDING CLUSTER (cont'd)
Through June 30, 1994
Revision
Checkflst
Number
Federal Requirement
Cluster
10
11
t12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Interim Status Standards * Applicability
Corrections to Test Methods Manual
Satellite Accumulation
Definition of Solid Waste
Dioxin Waste Listing and Management Standards
Interim Status Standards for Treatment, Storage,
and Disposal Facilities
Paint Filter Test
HSWA Codification Rule
Small Quantity Generators
Delisting
Household Waste
Waste Minimization
Location Standards for Salt Domes, Salt
Beds, Underground Mines and Caves
Liquids in Landfills
Dust Suppression
Double Liners
Ground-Water Monitoring
Cement Kilns
Fuel Labeling
Corrective Action
Pre-construction Ban
Permit Life
Omnibus Provision
Interim Status
Research and Development Permits
Hazardous Waste Exports
Exposure Information
Listing of TDI, TDA, DNT
Burning of Waste Fuel and Used Oil Fuel in Boilers
and Industrial Furnaces
Listing of Spent Solvents
Listing of EDB Waste
Listing of Four Spent Solvents
23
t
t
t
17 A-
17 B-
17C-
17D-
17 E-
17F-
17G-
17H-
17 I-
17 J-
17 K-
17 L-
17 M
17 N-
17 O-
17 P-
17 Q
17R-
17 S-
Non-HSWA Cluster I
Non-HSWA Cluster I
Non-HSWA Cluster I
Non-HSWA Cluster I
HSWA Cluster I
Non-HSWA Cluster I
HSWA Cluster I
HSWA Cluster I
HSWA Cluster I
HSWA Cluster I
HSWA Cluster I
HSWA Cluster I
HSWA Cluster I
Continued...
UST14 - 7/30/93 (Prim*: 2/i/Kl
-------
1
Revision
Checklist
Number
23
242/
25
T26
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9641.00-21
SPA 15
TABLE G-2. NUMERICAL LISTING OF REVISION CHECKLISTS
AND CORRESPONDING CLUSTER (cont'd)
Through June 30, 1934
Federal Requirement
Cluster
Generators of 100 to 1000 kg Hazardous Waste
Financial Responsibility: Settlement Agreement
Codification Rule, Technical Correction (Paint
Filter Test)
Listing of Spent Pickle Liquor (K062)
Liability Coverage - Corporate Guarantee
Standards for Hazardous Waste Storage and
Treatment Tank Systems
Correction to Listing of Commercial Chemical
Products and Appendix VIII Constituents
Biennial Report; Correction
Exports of Hazardous Waste
Standards for Generators - Waste Minimization
Certifications
Listing of EBDC
Land Disposal Restrictions
Revised Manual SW-846; Amended Incorporation
by Reference
Closure/Post-Closure Care for Interim Status
Surface Impoundments
Definition of Solid Waste; Technical Corrections
Amendments to Part B Information Requirements
for Land Disposal Facilities
California List Waste Restrictions
List (Phase 1) of Hazardous Constituents for
Ground-Water Monitoring
Identification and Listing of Hazardous Waste
Exception Reporting for Small Quantity Generators
of Hazardous Waste
HSWA Cluster I
Non-HSWA Cluster II and Non-
HSWA Cluster VI
HSWA Cluster I
Non-HSWA Cluster II
Non-HSWA Cluster III
Non-HSWA Cluster 111 and HSWA
Cluster I
Non-HSWA Cluster III
HSWA Cluster I
HSWA Cluster I
HSWA Cluster I
HSWA Cluster I
HSWA Cluster I
Non-HSWA Cluster III
Non-HSWA Cluster III
Non-HSWA Cluster III
Non-HSWA Cluster III
HSWA Cluster II
Non-HSWA Cluster IV
Non-HSWA Cluster IV
HSWA Cluster II
24
Continued...
LIST14 - 7/30/93 (!>««•* 2/1/9SI
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
TABLE G-2. NUMERICAL LISTING OF REVISION CHECKLISTS
AND CORRESPONDING CLUSTER (cont'd)
Through June 30, 1994
Revision
Checklist
Number
Federal Requirement
Cluster
44
45
46
47
48
t49
50
51
52
53
t54
Liability Requirements for Hazardous Waste
Facilities; Corporate Guarantee
HSWA Codification Rule 2
44 A - Permit Application Requirements
Regarding Corrective Action
44 B - Corrective Action Beyond Facility
Boundary
44 C - Corrective Action for Injection Wells
44 D - Permit Modification
44 E - Permit as a Shield Provision
44 F - Permit Conditions to Protect Human
Health and the Environment
44 G - Post-Closure Permits
Hazardous Waste Miscellaneous Units
Technical Correction; Identification and Listing of
Hazardous Waste
Identification and Listing of Hazardous Waste;
Technical Correction
Farmer Exemptions; Technical Corrections
Identification and Listing of Hazardous Waste;
Treatability Studies Sample Exemption
Land Disposal Restrictions for First Third
Scheduled Wastes
Standards Applicable to Owners and Operators of
Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage and
Disposal Facilities; Liability Coverage (withheld;
EPA is responding to the settlement of litigation
surrounding this rule)
Hazardous Waste Management System; Standards
for Hazardous Waste Storage and Treatment Tank
Systems
Identification and Listing of Hazardous Waste; and
Designation, Reportable Quantities, and
Notification
Permit Modifications for Hazardous Waste
Management Facilities
Non-HSWA Cluster IV
HSWA Cluster II
Non-HSWA Cluster IV
Non-HSWA Cluster IV
HSWA Cluster II
HSWA Cluster II
Non-HSWA Cluster V
HSWA Cluster II
Non-HSWA Cluster V
Non-HSWA Cluster V and HSWA
Cluster II
Non-HSWA Cluster V
Non-HSWA Cluster V
25
Continued...
LIST14 • 7/30/93 ifrira* 2/1/981
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
TABLE 6-2. NUMERICAL LISTING OF REVISION CHECKLISTS
AND CORRESPONDING CLUSTER (cont'd)
Through June 30, 1994
Revision
Checklist
Number
Federal Requirement
Cluster
55
t56
t57
t58
59
60
T61
62
63
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
Statistical Methods for Evaluating Ground-Water
Monitoring Data from Hazardous Waste Facilities
Identification and Listing of Hazardous Waste;
Removal of Iron Dextran from the List of
Hazardous Wastes
Identification and Listing of Hazardous Waste;
Removal of Strontium Sulfide from the List of
Hazardous Wastes
Standards for Generators of Hazardous Waste;
Manifest Renewal
Hazardous Waste Miscellaneous Units; Standards
Applicable to Owners and Operators
Amendment to Requirements for Hazardous Waste
Incinerator Permits
Changes to Interim Status Facilities for Hazardous
Waste Management Permits; Modifications of
Hazardous Waste Management Permits;
Procedures for Post-Closure Permitting
Land Disposal Restriction Amendments to First
Third Scheduled Wastes
Land Disposal Restrictions for Second Third
Scheduled Wastes
Delay of Closure Period for Hazardous Waste
Management Facilities
Mining Waste Exclusion I
Land Disposal Restrictions; Correction to First
Third Scheduled Wastes
Testing and Monitoring Activities
Reportable Quantity Adjustment Methyl Bromide
Production Wastes
Reportable Quantity Adjustment
Changes to Part 124 Not Accounted for by
Present Checklists
Mining Waste Exclusion II
Non-HSWA Cluster V
Non-HSWA Cluster V
Non-HSWA Cluster V
Non-HSWA Cluster V
Non-HSWA Cluster V
Non-HSWA Cluster V
Non-HSWA Cluster V
HSWA Cluster it
HSWA Cluster II
Non-HSWA Cluster VI
Non-HSWA Cluster VI
HSWA Cluster II
Non-HSWA Cluster VI
HSWA Cluster II
HSWA Cluster II
Non-HSWA VI
Non-HSWA Cluster VI
26
Continued...
LIST14 - 7/30/93 |Pnn»d: 2/i/SSl
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
TABLE G-2. NUMERICAL LISTING OF REVISION CHECKLISTS
AND CORRESPONDING CLUSTER (cont'd)
Through June 30, 1994
Revision
Checklist
Number
Federal Requirement
Cluster
t72
73
74
75
t76
77
79
t80
81
82
83
T84
85
862'
87
t88
Modification of F019 Listing
Testing and Monitoring Activities;
Technical Corrections
Toxicity Characteristics Revision
Listing of 1,1-Dimethylhydrazine
Production Wastes
Criteria for Listing Toxic
Wastes; Technical Amendment
HSWA Codification Rule, Double
Liners; Correction
Land Disposal Restrictions for
Third Third Scheduled Wastes
Hazardous Waste Treatment,
Storage, and Disposal Facilities-Organic Air
Emission Standards For Process Vents and
Equipment Leaks
Toxicity Characteristic; Hydrocarbon Recovery
Operations
Petroleum Refinery Primary and Secondary
Oil/Water/Solids Separation Sludge Listings (F037
and F038)
Wood Preserving Listings
Land Disposal Restrictions for Third
Third Scheduled Wastes; Technical Amendment
Toxicity Characteristic; Chlorofluoro-
carbon Refrigerants
Burning of Hazardous Waste in Boilers and
Industrial Furnaces
Removal of Strontium Sulfide From the List of
Hazardous Waste; Technical Amendment
Organic Air Emission Standards for Process Vents
and Equipment Leaks; Technical Amendment
Administrative Stay for K069 Listing
Non-HSWA Cluster VI
Non-HSWA Cluster VI
HSWA Cluster II
HSWA Cluster II
Non-HSWA Cluster Vt
HSWA Cluster II
Non-HSWA Cluster VI and
HWSA CLuster II
HSWA Cluster II
RCRA I, HSWA
RCRA I, HSWA
RCRA I, HSWA/Non-HSWA
RCRA I, HSWA
RCRA I, HSWA
RCRA I. HSWA/Non-HSWA
RCRA I, Non-HSWA
RCRA I. HSWA
RCRA I, Non-HSWA
27
Continued...
LIST14 - 7/30/83 iPrnwt: tnn»
-------
Revision
Checklist
Number
T89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
t98
199
100
T101
102
103
T104
t105
106
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
TABLE G-2. NUMERICAL LISTING OF REVISION CHECKLISTS
AND CORRESPONDING CLUSTER (cont'd)
Through June 30, 1994
Federal Requirement
Cluster
Revision to F037 and F038 Listings
Mining Exclusion HI
Administrative Stay for F032, F034, and F035
Listings
Wood Preserving Listings; Technical Corrections
Liability Requirements; Technical Amendment [
withheld until all of the settlement agreement
provisions have been promulgated}
Burning of Hazardous Waste in Boilers and
Industrial Furnaces; Corrections and Technical
Amendments I
Land Disposal Restrictions for Electric Arc Furnace
Dust(K061)
Burning of Hazardous Waste in Boilers and
Industrial Furnaces; Technical Amendments II
RCRA I, HSWA
RCRA I, Non-HSWA
RCRA I, HSWA/Non-HSWA
RCRA II, HSWA/Non-HSWA
RCRA II, Non-HSWA
RCRA II. HSWA/Non-HSWA
RCRA II, HSWA
RCRA II, HSWA/Non-HSWA
Exports of Hazardous Waste; Technical Correction RCRA II, HSWA
Coke Ovens Administrative Stay
Amendments to Interim Status Standards for
Downgradient Ground-Water Monitoring Well
Locations
Liners and Leak Detection Systems for Hazardous
Waste Land Disposal Units
Administrative Stay for the Requirement That
Existing Drip Pads be Impermeable
Second Correction to the Third Third Land
Disposal Restrictions
Hazardous Debris Case-by-Case Capacity Variance
Oil Filter Exclusion
Coke By-Product Exclusion
Lead-Bearing Hazardous Materials Case-by-Case
Capacity Variance
RCRA II, HSWA
RCRA II, Non-HSWA
RCRA II, HSWA/Non-HSWA
RCRA II, HSWA/Non-HSWA
RCRA II, HSWA
RCRA II, HSWA
RCRA II, HSWA
RCRA II, HSWA
RCRA II, HSWA
28
Continued...
LIST14 - 7/30/93 iftra* 2/iraS)
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
TABLE G-2. NUMERICAL LISTING OF REVISION CHECKLISTS
AND CORRESPONDING CLUSTER (cont'd)
Through June 30. 1994
Revision
Checklist
Number
107
108
* ft
Federal Requirement
Used Oil Filter Exclusion; Technical Corrections
Toxicity Characteristics Revisions; Technical
Cluster
RCRA 111, HSWA
RCRA III. HSWA
Corrections
109 Land Disposal Restrictions for Newly Listed
Wastes and Hazardous Debris
110 Coke By-Products Listings
111 Boilers and Industrial Furnaces; Technical
Amendment III
112 Recycled Used Oil Management Standards
113 Consolidated Liability Requirements
114 Boilers and Industrial Furnaces; Technical
Amendment JV
115 Chlorinated Toluenes Production Waste Listing
116 Hazardous Soil Case-by-Case Capacity Variance
t117 A Reissuance of the "Mixture" and "Derived-From"
Rules
117 B Toxicity Characteristic Revision
118 Liquids in Landfills II
t119 Toxicity Characteristic Revision; TCLP Correction
120 Wood Preserving; Amendments to Listings and
Technical Corrections
t121 Corrective Action Management Units and
Temporary Units
122 Recycled Used Oil Management Standards;
Technical Amendments and Corrections
123 Land Disposal Restrictions; Renewal of the
Hazardous Debris Case-by-Case Capacity Variance
124 Land Disposal Restrictions for Ignitable and
Corrosive Characteristic Wastes Whose Treatment
Standards Were Vacated
125 Boilers and Industrial Furnaces; Changes for
Consistency with New Air Regulations
29
RCRA III, HSWA
RCRA III, HSWA
RCRA III, HSWA/Non-HSWA
RCRA III, HSWA/Non-HSWA
RCRA III, Non-HSWA
RCRA III, HSWA/Non-HSWA
RCRA III, HSWA
RCRA lit, HSWA
RCRA III, HSWA/Non-HSWA
RCRA III, HSWA
RCRA III, HSWA
RCRA III, HSWA
RCRA III, HSWA/Non-HSWA
RCRA III, HSWA
RCRA III, HSWA/Non-HSWA
RCRA III, HSWA
RCRA III, HSWA
RCRA IV, HSWA/Non-HSWA
Continued...
LIST14 • 7/30/93 IPrrad: 2/1/9SI
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9641.00-21
SPA 15
TABLE 6-2. NUMERICAL LISTING OF REVISION CHECKLISTS
AND CORRESPONDING CLUSTER (cont'd)
Through June 30, 1994
Revision
Checklist
Number
Federal Requirement
Cluster
126
T127
128
1129
130
131
132
t133
134
Testing and Monitoring Activities
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces; Administrative
Stay and Interim Standards for Bevill 'Residues
Wastes From the Use of Chlorophenolic
Formulations in Wood Surface Protection
Revision of Conditional Exemption for Small Scale
Treatability Studies
Recycled Used Oil Management Standards;
Technical Amendments and Corrections II
Recordkeeping Instructions; Technical Amendment
Wood Surface Protection; Correction
Letter of Credit Revision
Correction of Beryllium Powder (P015) Listing
RCRA IV, HSWA/Non-HSWA
RCRA IV, HSWA
RCRA IV, Non-HSWA
RCRA IV, Non-HSWA
RCRA IV, HSWA/Non-HSWA
RCRA IV, Non-HSWA
RCRA IV, Non-HSWA
RCRA IV, Non-HSWA
RCRA IV, Non-HSWA
t Optional.
1 Direct Action against insurers in RCRA §3004(t) is not delegable to the States. EPA realizes that
six States are currently "authorized" for this provision. Several States have included this provision in their
pending HSWA I revision applications. The Regions should review these provisions and clarify with their
States that, by virtue of the statute, the Federal cause of action ensured by RCRA §3004(t) remains in
effect in authorized States. This provision is not delegable because authorized provisions of State law
must operate in lieu of the Federal counterpart and, in this situation, State law providing for a direct cause
of action against insurers may augment the Federal Action, but not supersede it.
2Only those sections, i.e., 40 CFR 264.113 and 265.113, of Revision Checklist 24 (Amended)
recharacterized as more stringent by the June 26, 1990 correction are included in Non-HSWA Cluster VI.
All other Revision Checklist 24 provisions continue to be included in Non-HSWA Cluster It. States which
have already adopted the 264.113 and 265.113 amendments as part of their authorization for Revision
Checklist 24 in Non-HSWA Cluster II, are not affected by this correction and do not have to submit an
amended Revision Checklist 24.
3While Revision Checklists 27 and 43 are optional, states which have adopted or choose to adopt
the changes addressed by Revision Checklist 27, must adopt Revision Checklist 43's changes.
4The May 2, 1986 amendments to 40 CFR 264.113 and 265.113, addressed by Revision Checklist
24, must be adopted before or simultaneous with adopting the provisions addressed by Revision Checklist
64. Also see Footnote 1.
30
Continued...
LIST14 - 7/30/93 |Pr«M: 2/1/911
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
TABLE G-2. NUMERICAL LISTING OF REVISION CHECKLISTS
AND CORRESPONDING CLUSTER (cont'd)
Through June 30, 1994
5Revision Checklist 78 is in HSWA Cluster II, with the exception of the clarifying amendment to
S268.33(c) which is in Non-HSWA Cluster VI. This clarification is not immediately effective in authorized
States since the requirements are not imposed pursuant to HSWA. Thus, these requirements are
applicable only in those States that do not have interim or final authorization. In authorized States, the
requirements will not be applicable until the State revises its program to adopt equivalent requirements
under State law.
6The rule addressed by this checklist is a technical amendment to the final rule (53 FR 43881;
October 31, 1988; Revision Checklist 57) that removed strontium sulfide from 40 QFR 261.33, the list of
commercial chemical products that are hazardous wastes when discarded or intended to be discarded.
States that intend to remove strontium sulfide from their hazardous wastes lists, but have not yet adopted
the changes made by Revision Checklist 57, are strongly encouraged to adopt the changes addressed by
Revision Checklists 57 and 86 at the same time. Those States that have already adopted the Revision
Checklist 57 provisions should adopt the Revision Checklist 86 amendments as soon as possible. States
should note that Revision Checklist 86 is a conditionally optional checklist. States choosing not to adopt
the removal of strontium sulfide (i.e. Revision Checklist 57) should not adopt the Revision Checklist 86
provisions. However, States that choose to remove strontium sulfide must adopt the provisions addressed
by Revision checklist 86 to be sure that material has been properly removed from the State's lists and
appendices.
31
LIST14 - 7/30/93
2/iraSI
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
Checklist Linkage Table
The following pages (numbered 3 through 9)
should replace pages 3 through 9 of
SAM Appendix H
-------
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
Revision Checklist Linkage Table
as of June 30, 1994
Revision
Checklist Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
* 14
t
Linked
Checklists
17 D, 30
10
17 0,32,58
13
17C
3
35,67,73,126
8,37
Topic or Explanation
Biennial Report
Permit - Settlement Agreement1
Interim Status - Applicability
Chlorinated Aliphatic Hydrocarbon Listing
National Uniform Manifest Requirements
Permit - Settlement Agreement^--
Warfarin & Zinc Phosphate Listing
Lime Stabilized Pickle Liquor Sludge
Household Waste Exclusion
Interim Status - Applicability
Corrections to Test Methods Manual
Satellite Accumulation
Definition of Solid Waste
Dtoxin Waste Listing and Management
15
16
17 A2
17 B
17 C
17 D
17 E
17 F
17 G
17 H
171
17 J
17 K3
17L
17 M
17 N
17 O
25
23,42,47
9
1,5,30,32,58
118
77,100
19
Standards
Landfill Interim Status
Paint Filter Test
Small Quantity Generators
Delisting
Household Waste Exclusion
Biennial Report/National Uniform Manifest
Salt Domes, Salt Beds, Underground Mines
and Caves Standards
Liquids in Landfills
Dust Suppression
Double Liners
Ground-Water Monitoring
Cement Kilns
Fuel Labeling
Corrective Action
Pre-construction Ban
Permit Life
Omnibus Provision
LINK 15 - 7/29/94 Continued...
IPrtat** 12/21/94]
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
Revision Checklist Linkage Table
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
Revision
Checklist Number
. Linked
Checklists
Topic or Explanation
17 P
17 Q
17 R*
17S
18
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
286
297
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
31,48,97
85,104,107,112,122,130
22
20
17 A.42,47
64
16
43
52
46
1.17D
17 R,48,97
5,17 D.58
39,50,63,78,109
11,67,73,126
13
34,50,63,78,109
Interim Status
Research and Development Permits
Hazardous Waste Exports
Exposure Information
TDI, TDA, & DNT Listing
Waste Fuel/Used Oil Fuel
Spent Solvents Listing
EDB Waste Listing
Four Spent Solvents Listing
Small Quantity Generators
Financial Responsibility - Settlement
Agreement
Paint Filter Test
Spent Pickle Liquor Listing
Corporate Guarantee
Hazardous Waste Tank Systems
Listings - 261.33{e)&(f) and Associated
Appendices
Biennial Report
Exports of Hazardous Waste
National Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest
EDBC Listing
Solvents & Dioxins Land Disposal
Restrictions
Corrections - Test Methods Manual
Surface Impoundments: Closure/Post.
Closure Care
Definition of Solid Waste
Part B Information Requirements
Amendment
California List Waste Land Disposal
Restrictions
List of Hazardous Constituents for Ground-
Water Monitoring
LJNK15 - 7/29/94 Continued...
IPniterf: 12/21/941
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
Revision Checklist Linkage Table
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
Revision . Linked
Checklist Number Checklists Topic or Explanation
41 — Container/Liner Residues
42 17 A,23,47 Small Quantity Generators
43 27 Corporate Guarantee
44 A ... Permits/Corrective Action
44 B — Corrective Action Beyond Facility Boundary
44 C — Corrective Action for Injection Wells
44 D 54 Permit Modification
44 E — Permit as a Shield Provision
44 F — Permit Conditions/Health-Environment
44 G — Post-Closure Permits, Scope of Requirement
45 59 Miscellaneous Units
* 46 29 Listings 261.33(e),(f) and Associated
Appendices
47 17 A,23,42 Small Quantity Generators
48 17R,31,97 Hazardous Waste Exports
49 129 Sample Exemption
50 34,39,62,63,66,78,95,109 Third Third Land Disposal Restrictions
51 93 Liability Coverage
52 28 Hazardous Waste Tank Systems
* 53 — Smelting Waste Listing
54 44 D Permit Modification
55 — Ground-Water Monitoring Statistical
Methods
* 56 — Iron Dextran Listing Removal
* 57 86 Strontium Sulfide Listing Removal
58 5,170,32 National Uniform Manifest
59 45 Miscellaneous Units
60 — Incinerator Permits
61 — Changes to Interim Status Facilities
Reconstruction Limits
54 Modifications to Hazardous Waste
Management Permits (270.42 Appendix)
Procedures for Post-closure Permitting
62 50,66,109 First Third Land Disposal Restriction
Correction
63 34,39,50,78,109 Second Third Land Disposal Restrictions
UNK16 - 7/29/94 Continued...
5 (Printed: 12/21/941
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9641.00-21
SPA 15
Revision Checklist Linkage Table
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
Revision
Checklist Number
. Linked
Checklists
Topic or Explanation
»
*
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
24
71,90
50,62,109
11,35,73,126
65,90
11,35,67,126
80,84,108,1176,119
17H.100
34,39,50,83,100,102.103,106,
109,116.123,124
87
74,84.108
89
91,92,101,120
78,102,103,106,109,116
123,124
74,80,108
19,94,96,105,110,111,114,
125,127
57
79
6
Delay of Closure Period for Hazardous
Waste Management Facilities
Mining Waste Exclusion I
First Third Land Disposal Restriction
Correction
Testing and Monitoring Activities
Methyl Bromide Production Wastes
Chlorinated Aliphatic Hydrocarbon
Production Wastes
Updates to Part 124
Mining Waste Exclusion II
Modification of F019 Listing
Analytical Test Methods
Toxicity Characteristic Revisions
1,1-Dimethylhydrazine Production Wastes
Listing
Criteria for Listing Toxic Wastes
Corrections - Double Liners
Third Third Land Disposal Restrictions
Organic Air Emission Standards for Process
Vents and Equipment Leaks
Toxicity Characteristic; Hydrocarbon
Recovery Operations
Petroleum Refinery Primary and Secondary
Oil/Water/Solids Separation Sludge
Listings (F037 and F038)
Wood Preserving Listings
Third Third Land Disposal Restriction
Correction
Toxicity Characteristic
Burning of Hazardous Waste in Boilers and
Industrial Furnaces
Strontium Sulfide Listing Removal
Organic Air Emission Standards for Process
Vents and Equipment Leaks
UNK15 - 7/29/94 Continued...
IPntUxl: 12/21.'941
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9641.00-21
SPA 15
Revision Checklst Linkage Table
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
Revision
Checklist Number
> Linked
Checklists
Topic or Explanation
88
89
90
91
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
81
65,71
82,92,101,120
92 82,91,101,120
93 51
94 19,85,96,111,114,125,127
50
85,94,98,111,114
17R,31,48
85,96,105,110
17 H,77
82,91,92,120
78,83
78,83,109,116,123
107,112
85,98,110
Administrative Stay for K069 Listing
Revision to F037 and F038 Listing
Mining Waste III
Administrative Stay for Wood Preserving
Wastes
Wood Preserving Listings; Technical
Corrections
Liability Requirements; Technical
Amendment
Burning of Hazardous Waste in Boilers and
Industrial Furnaces; Corrections and
Technical Amendments
Finalization of treatment standards for the
K061 nonwastewaters in the high zinc
subcategory
Burning of Hazardous Waste in Boilers and
Industrial Furnaces; Technical
Amendments II
Exports of Hazardous Waste; Technical
Correction
Burning of Hazardous Waste in Boilers and
Industrial Furnaces; Administrative Stay
of Applicability and Technical
Amendment
Amendments to Interim Status Standards
for Downgradient Ground-Water
Monitoring Weil Locations
Liners and Leak Detection Systems for
Hazardous Waste Land Disposal Units
Existing Drip Pad Administrative Stay
Second Correction to the Third Third Land
Disposal Restrictions
Hazardous Debris Case-by-Case Capacity
Variance
Used Oil Filter Exclusion
Recycled Coke By-Product Exclusion
LINK16 - 7/29/94 Continued...
d: 12/21/MI
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9641.00-21
SPA 15
Revision Checklist Linkage Table
as of June 30,1994 (cont'd)
Revision
Checklist Number
» Linked
Checklists
Topic or Explanation
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117 A
117 B
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
78,83,109,116
104
74,1176,119
34,39,50,63,78,103,106
85,98,105
85,94,96,114,127
19,104,107,122,130
85,94,96,111
78,83,103,106,123
74,108,119
17 F
74,108,117 B
82,91,92,101
19,112,130
78,83,103,116
78,83
85,94
8
Lead-Bearing Hazardous Materials Case-by-
Case Capacity Variance
Used Oil Filter Exclusion Corrections
Toxicity Characteristic Revisions
Newly Listed Wastes and Hazardous Debris
Land Disposal Restrictions
Coke By-Products Listings
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces; Technical
Amendment III
Recycled Used Oil Management Standards
Liability Coverage and Financial
Responsibility
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces; Technical
Amendment IV
Chlorinated Toluenes Production Waste
Listing
Hazardous Soil Case-by-Case Capacity
Variance
"Mixture" and "Derived-from" Rules
Toxicity Characteristic Revision
Liquids in Landfills II
Toxicity Characteristic Revision; TCLP
Correction
Wood Preserving; Amendments to Listings
and Technical Requirements
Corrective Action Management Units and
Temporary Units
Recycled Used Oil Management Standards;
Technical Amendments and Corrections
Hazardous Waste Debris Case-by-Case
Capacity Variance Renewal
Land Disposal Restrictions for Ignitable and
Corrosive Characteristic Wastes Whose
Treatment Standards Were Vacated
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces; Changes for
Consistency with New Air Regulations
LINK16 - 7/29/94 Continuod...
d: 12.'21/M|
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
Revision Checklist Linkage Table
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
Revision
Checklist Number
. Linked
Checklists
Topic or Explanation
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
11,35,67,73
85,94,111
132
49
19,112,122
128
Testing and Monitoring Activities
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces;
Administrative Stay and Interim
Standards for Bevill Residues
Wastes From the Use of Chlorophenolic
Formulations in Wood Surface Protection
Revision of Conditional Exemption for Small
Scale Treatability Studies
Recycled Used Oil Management Standards;
Technical Amendments and Corrections
II
Recordkeeping Instructions; Technical
Amendment
Wood Surface Protection; Correction
Letter of Credit Revision
Correction of Beryllium Powder (P015)
Listing
* These are checklists affecting the lists of hazardous waste in 40 CFR 261, Subpart D.
1 While Revision Checklists 2 and 6 address similar topics, they affect different sections of
code.
2 Superseded by Revision Checklist 23.
3 Superseded by Revision Checklist 19.
4 Superseded by Revision Checklist 31.
6 Superseded by Revision Checklists 85 and 112.
6 Contains sections superseded by Revision Checklist 52.
7 Superseded by Revision Checklist 46.
DUNK1S- 1/6/94
[Pnttxi: 12/21/941
-------
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
Revision Checklist 49
The following version of Revision Checklist 49
should replace the existing version in
SAM Appendix J
-------
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO.
9 541. OO-21
SPA 15
RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 49
Identification and Listing of Hazardous Waste;
Treatability Studies Sample Exemption
53 FR 27290-29302
July 19, 1988
(Non-HSWA Cluster V)
Note: The standards addressed by 261.4{e) and (f) are less stringent than existing Federal
requirements; thus, authorized States are not required to adopt them. EPA strongly encourages
States to do so, however, to facilitate evaluating remediation alternatives for CERCLA clean-ups
and for the RCRA Corrective Action Program. This rule will also speed research and development
for treatment alternatives to land disposal and waste minimization, recycling, and reuse. This rule
was amended by a February 18, 1994 rule (59 FR 8362-8366; Revision Checklist 129) which
increases the quantity and time limits for contaminated media to be used in treatability studies.
States which are not authorized for Revision Checklist 49 and who choose to adopt this checklist
are encouraged to adopt the revisions addressed in Revision Checklist 129 at the same time the
requirements addressed by Revision Checklist 49 are adopted.
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
PART 260 - HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM: GENERAL
SUBPART B - DEFINITIONS
DEFINITIONS
t add "treatability
study"
260.10
PART 261 - IDENTIFICATION AND LISTING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
SUBPART A - GENERAL
t EXCLUSIONS
regulation of
treatability study
samples and relation to
quantity determination
of 26 1.5 and
262.34(d)
collection and
preparation of sample
for transport
261.4(e)(1)
261.4(e)(1)(i)
July 19, 1988-Page 1 of 4
DCL4915 -RivMd 03/22/94
Printed 12/21/34
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 49: Identification and Listing of Hazardous Waste;
Treatability Studies Sample Exemption (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
accumulation or
storage of sample prior
to .transport
transport of sample to
laboratory or testing
facility
introductory paragraph
regarding provisions
for exemption under
(e)(1)
sample size limit by
hazardous waste type
for sample collector
weight limit for each
sample shipment
packaging
requirements for
sample
compliance with U.S.
DOT, USPS or other
for transport
information required if
DOT, USPS, or other
do not apply to
shipment
laboratory or testing
facility requirements
3-year maintenance of
specified records
records which must
be maintained
biennial report
requirements
*,
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
261.4(e)(1)(ii)
261.4(e)(1)(iii)
261.4{e><2)
261.4(e)(2)(i)
261.4(e)(2)(ii)
261 .4(e)(2)(iii)
261.4(e)(2)(iii)(A)
261.4(e)t2)(iii)(B)(1)-
(5)
261.4(e)(2)(iv)
261.4(eH2)(v)
261.4(e)(2)(v)(A)-(C)
261.4(e)(2)(vi)
ANALOGOUS STATE CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
n§
•
July 19, 1988-Page 2 of 4
DCL49.15 . R*viMd: 03/22/94
Printed: 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 49: Identification and Listing of Hazardous Waste;
Treatability Studies Sampie Exemption (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
granting of requests
for additional
quantities; application
procedure
reason for request and
additional quantity
needed
required
documentation
description of
technical modifications
equipment and
mechanical failure
information
other information
requirements for
samples undergoing
treatability studies at
labs and testing
facilities
notification
requirements
EPA identification
number of laboratory
or testing facility
single day quantity
restrictions on
initiation of treatment
studies
limitations on storage
of treatability study
samples
exclusion of
treatabifity study
residues
/
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
261.4(e)(3)
261.4(e)(3)(i)
261.4(e)(3)(ii)
261.4(e)(3)(iii)
261.4
261.4{e){3)(v)
261 .4(f)
261.4(f)(1)
261.4{f)(2)
261 .4{f>(3)
261.4(f)(4)
261.4(f)(4){i)
ANALOGOUS STATE CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
•
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
July 19, 1988-Page 3 of 4
DCL49.15 • RtviMd: 03/22/94
Pnrt«j; 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 49: Identification and Listing of Hazardous Waste;
Treatability Studies Sample Exemption (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
exclusion of added
treatment materials
90 days/1 year
limitations on duration
of exemption
land placement and
open burning of study
samples not allowed
3-year maintenance
and storage of
treatability study
records
list of specific
information needed for
each treatability study
3-year maintenance of
shipping records and
treatability study
contract
laboratory or
treatability study
facility annual report
requirement
required annual report
information
hazardous waste
determination for
unused samples by
facility
notification when
facility discontinues
treatability studies
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
261.4(f)(4)(ii)
261 .4
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
ATTACHMENT C
Consolidated Checklists as of June 30, 1994
-------
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
Consolidated Checklist for the Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994
The following consolidated checklist
should replace the existing version in
SAM Appendix K
-------
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST
for the
Land Disposal Restrictions as of June 30, 1994
Note: 1) This checklist consolidates the changes to Federal code addressed by the following
Land Disposal Restrictions (LDR) checklists:
Revision Checklist 34 151 FR 40572 (November 7, 1986), 52 EB 21010 (June 4, 1987)];
Revision Checklist 39 [52 FR 25760 (July 8, 1987), 52 FR 41295 (October 27, 1987)J;
Revision Checklist 50 [53 FR 31138 (August 17, 1988), 54 FR 8264 (February 27, 1989)];
Revision Checklist 62 [54 FR 18836 (May 2, 1989)];
Revision Checklist 63 [54 FR 26594 (June 23, 1989)1;
Revision Checklist 66 [54 FR 36967 (September 6, 1989), 55 FR 23935 (June 13, 1990)];
Revision Checklist 78 [55 FR 22520 (June 1, 1990)];
Revision Checklist 83 [56 FR 3864 (January 31, 1991)1;
Revision Checklist 95 [56 FR 41164 (August 19, 1991)1;
Revision Checklist 102 [57 FR 8086 (March 6, 1992)];
Revision Checklist 103 [57 FR 20766 (May 15, 1992)];
Revision Checklist 106 [57 FR 28628 (June 26, 1992)1;
Revision Checklist 109 [57 FR 37194 (August 18, 1992)1;
Revision Checklist 116 [57 FR 47772 (October 20, 1992)1;
Revision Checklist 123 [58 FR 28506 (May 14, 1993)]; and
Revision Checklist 124 [58 £R 29860 (May 24, 1993)].
The LDR "Checklist Reference" column indicates which of these checklists have affected each
listed citation. Subsequent to promulgation of the first LDR rule (i.e., the rule addressed by
Revision Checklist 34), checklists other than the LDR checklists have also affected certain
sections of code addressed by the LDR checklists. The effects of these subsequent checklists are
indicated in footnotes. Of special note are 270.42(o)&(p) and 270.72(e). In both cases,
subsequent checklists either removed or redesignated these sections of code. The section
numbering found in the associated LDR final rule for these paragraphs is used, rather than the
new numbering found in the subsequent checklists.
An exception to the footnoting procedure occurs to specify the effect which the Toxicity
Characteristics Rule had on the TCLP procedure. Because the TCLP procedure is integral to the
Third Third Rule requirements (see Note 6 below), the changes made by Revision Checklist 74,
non-LDR checklists, are noted in the LDR checklist reference column. Explanatory footnotes are
also included.
2) The following Part 268 sections are not delegable to States because of the national concerns
which must be examined when decisions are made relative to them: 268.5 (case-by-case
effective date extensions); 268.42(b) (application for alternate treatment method); and 268.44
(variance from a treatment standard). "No migration" petitions under 268.6 will be handled by
EPA, even though States may be authorized to grant such petitions in the future. States have the
authority to grant such petitions under RCRA Section 3006 because such decisions do not require
a national perspective, as is the case for decisions under 268.5, 268.42(b) or 268.44. However,
EPA has had few opportunities to implement the land disposal restrictions and expects to gain
valuable experience and information from reviewing "no-migration" petitions.
Page 1 of 135
DCLDfi94J 15 -RavMd: 7/29/94
Pnnttrf: 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
i
3) In the past, the nondelegable sections/paragraphs of the LDR regulations have been omitted
from the LDR checklists because States could not assume the authority for them. However, this
procedure has led to confusion among the States on how to handle the sections/paragraphs in
their code. For this reason, the Agency has decided to include these nondelegabie sections on
the LDR checklists. To differentiate these sections from the delegable portions of the LDR
restrictions, asterisks precede (a single row) and follow (a double row) each nondelegable section.
If States have already filled out a version of this Consolidated Land Disposal Restriction Checklist
which does not include the nondelegable sections, they need not filLout a revised version
containing these sections. This change in format was made only to improve clarity.
The Agency suggests that States incorporate the nondelegable portions of the LDR regulations
into their regulations because this incorporation aids the regulated community in knowing that the
extensions, exemptions and variances addressed by the nondelegable sections of code are
available to them. It is essential, however, that States leave the terms "Administrator", "Federal
Register" and "Agency" unchanged, i.e.. States may npl substitute analogous State terms for
these Federal terms. Similarly, States incorporating by reference must be careful to exclude these
sections from blanket substitutions of State terms for Federal terms. For a more complete
discussion of issues surrounding nondelegable sections, see Appendix J of the State
Authorization Manual (SAM).
4) Note that while 268.40 is delegable to States, "Administrator" in the following phrase
"approved by the Administrator under the procedures set forth in 268.42(b)" should not be
replaced in 268.40(b) with an analogous State term because it is referring to decisions under
268.42{b). Such decisions will be made by the EPA Administrator.
5) States do not need to adopt requirements equivalent to 40 CFR 268.10, 268.11, 268.12 and
268.13 because these sections of code contain the schedule by which EPA must evaluate wastes
for land disposal restrictions. As such, these sections of code are not included in this
consolidated checklist. States do need to adopt, however, requirements equivalent to 268.14.
Such requirements address the length of time interim status impoundments can be used to
receive or generate newly identified or listed hazardous wastes and resolve the potential conflicts
between RCRA §§3004(h)(4), 3005(j)(6) and 3004(j)(11) [see the discussion in the Federal
Register for Revision Checklist 109, pp. 37218-37221].
_ , _ OCUJR94J. 15 - B.v«d: 7/29/94
Page 2 of 135 P™««J 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
6} Note that the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) referred to by the Third Third
Scheduled Waste Rule is the TCLP entered into the Federal code at 40 CFR 261 Appendix II by
the Toxicity Characteristic Rule (55 FR. 11798, March 29, 1990) and amended at 55 FR 26986
(June 29, 1990). (Both the Toxicity Characteristic Rule and the June amendment are addressed
by Revision Checklist 74.) The TCLP procedure previously located at 40 CFR Part 268, Appendix
I and introduced by the Solvents and Dioxins Land Disposal Restrictions Rule (51 FR 40572;
November 7, 1986; Revision Checklist 34) is the outdated version of the TCLP. Thus, States
adopting the Third Third Scheduled Waste Rule must also adopt the new version of the TCLP. If
a State has already adopted the Revision Checklist 34 TCLP, this version must be replaced with
the Revision Checklist 74 TCLP. See Footnote ? of this checklist.
7) Guidance regarding the use of the new TCLP versus the EP Toxicity Test may be found at 55
FR 22660 (June 1, 1990).
8) Adopting the alternate treatment standards for lab packs is optional. However, if a State
chooses to adopt these alternate standards, all of the requirements related to these standards
must be adopted, including all of the provisions added by the Third Third Scheduled Waste Rule
(i.e.. Revision Checklist 78) at 264.316(f), 265.316{f), 268.7(a)(8), 268.7(a)(9), 268.42(c),
268.42(c)(1)-(4), and Appendices IV and V to Part 268.
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG ts:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
PART 260 - HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM: GENERAL
SUBPART A - GENERAL
PURPOSE, SCOPE, AND APPLICABILITY
insert "and 268"
insert "and 268"
insert "and 268"
insert "and 268"
insert "and 268"
34
34
34
34
34
260.1 (a)
260.1(b)(1)
260.1(b)(2)
260.1(b)(3)
260.1(b)(4)
AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION; CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION
insert "and 268"
insert "and 268"
34
34
260. 2(a)
260. 2(b)
USE OF NUMBER AND GENDER
insert "and 268"
34
260.3
Page 3 of 135
DCLDR94J 15 - Ravmd: 7/29/94
PnntMl- 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
t
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
SUBPART B - DEFINITIONS
DEFINITIONS
insert "and 268" to
introductory text
add "containment
building"
revise "miscellaneous
unit"
revise "pile"
34
109
109
109
260.10
260.10
260.10
260.10
REFERENCES
1 ,2 Parts 260 through
270
39
260. 11 (a)
SUBPART C - RULEMAKING PETITIONS
GENERAL
insert "and 268"
t34
260.20(a)
PART 261 - IDENTIFICATION AND LISTING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
SUBPART A - GENERAL
PURPOSE AND SCOPE
insert "268,"
insert ", 268"
34
34
261.1 (a)
261.1(a)(1)
DEFINITION OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
insert "of this part"
after the first
"subpart C"; insert
V before "or
unless"; add a
sentence addressing
the relationship of
nonwastewater
mixtures and the Part
268 requirements
109
261.3(a)(2Hiii)
A—
Page 4 of 135
DCLDR94J IS - R*v**d: 7/29/94
Pnm»d 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREhENTS
split paragraph into
two subparagraphs,
(C)W&(2), with the
second subparagraph
addressing the
notification for HTMR
residues; in first
subparagraph, insert
•, K062 or F006"
after "K061"; replace
"(as defined in 40
CFR 260. 10(6), (7),
and (12))" with "(as
defined in paragraphs
(6), (7), and (13) of
the definition for
'Industrial Furnace' in
40 CFR 260.10)";
replace "identified
below" with
"identified in the
tables in this
paragraph"; replace
"The generic
exclusion levels are:"
with a sentence
addressing burden of
proof for persons
claiming this
exclusion in an
enforcement action;
replace single table
with the two tables
indicated at 57 FJR
37264
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
95,109
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
261.3(c)(2)(ii)(C)
m
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
.
T,3
Page 5 of 135
DCLDR94J 15 - fi»v*od: 7/29/94
Printed 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
completely revise
requirements
addressing
notification and
certification; one-
time notification and
certification for
K061, K062or F006
HTMR residues,
which meet generic
exclusion levels and
exhibit no
characteristics, that
are sent to Subtitle D
units; update of
notification and
certification; annual
EPA/State
notification; deadline
for submission to
EPA/State; what the
notification must
include; certification
signed by authorized
representative and
what it must state
add parenthetical
phrase regarding
characteristic waste.
no longer exhibiting a
characteristic, that
still may be subject to
268 requirements
add new paragraph
and subparagraphs
addressing debris that
is excluded from
regulation provided it
meets specified
criteria:
*»
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
95,109
83
109
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
p
261.3(c)(2)(ii)(C)
(2)
261.3(dHD
261 .3(f)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
A,
Page 6 of 135
DCLDR94J IS
7/29/94
Primed: 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.OO-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
Part 268-defined
hazardous debris
treated using a
specified 268.45,
Table 1 , extraction or
destruction
technology; burden of
proof on claimant in
an enforcement
action
Part 268-defined
debris determined by
Regional
Administrator to no
longer be
contaminated with
hazardous waste
''
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
109
109
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
261.3(f)(1)
261.3(f)(2)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
EXCLUSIONS
t add new paragraph
which excludes as
solid waste
nonwastewater
splash condenser
dross residue from
the treatment of
K061 in high
temperature metals
recovery units,
provided it is shipped
in drums and not land
disposed before
recovery
insert "268,"
remove "267" and
insert "268"
95
34
34
261.4(a}(11)
261. 4(c)
261.4(d)(1)
Page 7 of 135
OCLDR94J.1S . Rtv««d 7/29/94
Prtrnad: 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
FEDERAL flCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATED BY CONDITIONALLY EXEMPT
SMALL QUANTITY GENERATORS
insert ", 268,"
insert ", 268,"
insert ", 268,"
4 insert", 268,"
insert ", 268,"
34
34
34
34
34
261. 5(b)
261. 5(c)
261 .5(e)
261.5{f)<2)
261.5(g)(2)
REQUIREMENTS FOR RECYCLABLE MATERIALS
insert "268,"
insert "268,"
34
34
261.6(a)(3)
261.6(c}(1)
RESIDUES OF HAZARDOUS WASTE IN EMPTY CONTAINERS
insert "268,"
insert "268,"
34
34
261.7(aX1)(ii)
261.7(a)(2)(ii)
+-
SUBPART C - CHARACTERISTICS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
GENERAL
insert "268,"; remove
", but is not listed as
a hazardous waste in
Subpart D"; change
"the EPA" to "every
EPA"; insert "that is
applicable as" before
"set forth"; remove
"in the respective
characteristic" before
"in this Subpart";
insert "used" after
"This number must
be"; before
"recordkeeping"
change "certain" to
"all applicable"
34,
78,83
26l.20(b)
Page 8 of 135
DCLDR94J.15 - R.v»«d: 7/29/94
Printed: 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
\
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG is:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
CHARACTERISTIC OF IGNITABILITY
remove ", but is not
listed as a hazardous
waste in Subpart D,"
78
261.2Kb)
CHARACTERISTIC OF CORROSIVITY
remove ", but is not
listed as a hazardous
waste in Subpart D,"
78
261.22(b)
CHARACTERISTIC OF REACTIVITY
remove " , but is not
listed as a hazardous
waste in Subpart D,"
78
261.23{b)
TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC
remove ", but is not
listed as a hazardous
waste in Subpart D,"
78
261.24(b)
SUBPART D - LISTS OF HAZARDOUS WASTES
GENERAL
insert "268."
34
261.30{c)
HAZARDOUS WASTES FROM NON-SPECIFIC SOURCES
add the waste
"F039" in alpha-
numeric order to list
78,83
261. 31 (a)
DISCARDED COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS, OFF-SPECIFICATION SPECIES, CONTAINER
RESIDUES, AND SPILL RESIDUES THEREOF
6 insert "or (f)" after
"(e)"; change
"261.7(b}(3)" to
"261. 7
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
/
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
APPENDIX VII, PART 261
BASIS FOR LISTING HAZARDOUS WASTE
add "F039" to list in
alphanumeric order
78
Appendix VII
PART 262 - STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO GENERATORS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
SUBPART A - GENERAL
HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION
in the first sentence.
replace "If" with "For
purposes of
compliance with 40
CFR Part 268, or if";
remove "as a
hazardous waste"
after "listed"; replace
"he must determine"
with "the generator
must then determine"
add new paragraph
regarding possible
exclusions or
restrictions in Parts
264, 265 or 268
78,83
34
262.1KC)
262.11 (d)
L
SUBPART C - PRE-TRANSPORT REQUIREMENTS
ACCUMULATION TIME
replace ";" at the end
of text with a ":"
replace "." with
"; and/or"
109
109
262.34
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
add new
subparagraphs
addressing waste
placed in containment
buildings; compliance
with 265, Subpart
DD; professional
engineer certification
of compliance with
265.1101 design
standards placed in
operating record no
later than 60 days
after the date of
initial unit operation;
requirements after
February 18, 1993;
records which must
be maintained
written description of
procedures to ensure
each waste volume
remains in unit for no
more than 90 days;
written description of
waste generation and
management
practices for the
facility showing that
they are consistent
with respecting the
90-day limit;
documentation that
procedures are
complied with
documentation that
unit is emptied at
least once every 90
days
CHECKUST
REFERENCE
109
109
109
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
262.34(aH1)(iv)
262.34(a)(1)(iv)
(A)
262.34(a)(1Hiv)
(B)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
_,
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
Page 11 of 135
DCLDR94J 15 - R»viMd: 7/29/94
12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
remove first
paragraph numbered
(a) (2) (including (a) (2}
«>&(»)>;
remove unnumbered
paragraph following
(a)(2)(ii)
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
109
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
262.34(a)(2)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
ACCUMULATION TIME
replace "and with
§265.16" with
', with $265.16, and
with 40 CFR 268. 7(a)
(4)"
replace "and"
between "section"
and "the
requirements" with
";" and add "the
requirements of 40
CFR 268.7(aK4}"
78
83
262.34(a){4)
262.34(d)(4)
•
SUBPART G - FARMERS
FARMERS
8 pesticide disposal by
farmers
t39
262.70
PART 263 - STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO TRANSPORTERS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
SUBPART A - GENERAL
TRANSFER FACILITY REQUIREMENTS
insert ", 268"
34
263.12
Page 12 of 135
DCLDR94J.1S - R*v
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
FEDERAL RCHA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
PART 264 - STANDARDS FOR OWNERS AND OPERATORS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
TREATMENT, STORAGE, AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES
SUBPART A - GENERAL
PURPOSE, SCOPE AND APPLICABILITY
change "." to ",";
add phrase regarding
compliance with
264.17(b) if owner or
operator is diluting
hazardous ignitable
wastes or corrosive
wastes to remove the
characteristic before
land disposal
add new paragraph
regarding facilities to
which Part 264
applies
124
34
264.1(g)(6)
264. 1(h)
9
SUBPART B - GENERAL FACILITY STANDARDS
GENERAL WASTE ANALYSIS
insert "Part 268";
add sentence
regarding what
information, at a
minimum, the waste
analysis must contain
revise comment
following paragraph
(a)(2) as follows:
remove "or all" after
"supply part"; add ",
except as otherwise
specified in 40 CFR
268.7(b) and (c)." to
the second sentence
insert "268.7"
34,102
78
34
264.1 3(a)<1)
264.13(a)(2)
264.1 3(b){6)
•
9,10
Page 13 of 135
DCLDR94J.15 - Ravmd 7/29/94
Pnnud: 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
add new paragraph
and subparagraphs
regarding exempted
surface impoundment
plan specifications
sampling
impoundment
contents
analysis procedures
annual removal of
specific residues;
criteria:
do not meet
treatment standards
of Part 268, Subpart
D
where no treatment
standards have been
established
prohibited disposal of
residues under
268.32 or RCRA
3004(d)
prohibited disposal of
residues under
268.33W
t
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
34
34
34
34,
39,50
50
50
50
50
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
264.13(b)(7)
264.13{b)(7){i)
264.13(b){7)(ii)
264.13{b)(7)(iii)
264.13(b)(7)(iii)
(A)
264.13(b)(7)(iii)
(B)
264.13(b)(7)(iii)
(B)m
264.1 3(b)(7)(iii)
(BK2)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQOIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
•-
SUBPART E - MANIFEST SYSTEM, RECORDKEEPING, AND REPORTING
OPERATING RECORD
add "268.4(aP and
"268.7"
34
264.73(b)(3)
Page 14 of 135
DCUDR94J.15 • R*vmd: 7/29/94
Pnntod: 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
add new paragraph;
records for each
shipment placed in
units under a 268.5
extension, a 268.6
petition, or a 268.8
certification; 268. 7(a)
generator notice
add new paragraph;
off-site treatment
facility requirements
add new paragraph;
on-site treatment
facility requirements
add new paragraph;
off-site land disposal
facility requirements
9 add new paragraph;
on-site land disposal
facility requirements
add new paragraph;
off-site storage
facility requirements
add new paragraph;
on-site storage
facility requirements
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
34,50
34,50
34,50
34,50
34,50
50
50
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
264.73(b)(10)
264.73(b){11)
264.73(b)(12)
264.73(b)<13)
264.73(b)(14)
264.73(b)(15)
264.73(b){16)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS;
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
SUBPART G - CLOSURE AND POST-CLOSURE
APPLICABILITY
remove "and" from
the end of paragraph
replace "." with ";"
replace "." with
"; and"
109
109
109
264.110{b)<1>
264.110(b)(2)
264.110
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
add new paragraph
addressing
containment buildings
that are required
under 264. 11 02 to
meet the
requirements for
landfills
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
109
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
•
264.1 10(b){4)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
\H SCOPE
CLOSURE PERFORMANCE STANDARD
change ", and
264.601 through
264.603" to
", 264.601 through
264.603, and
264.1102"
109
264.111(c)
CLOSURE PLAN; AMENDMENT OF PLAN
replace "264.90 et
seq." with "subpart F
of this part"; change
"and 264.601 "to
", 264.601 and
264.1102"
109
264.112(3) (2)
SUBPART H - FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS
APPLICABILITY
replace ", and" with
».»
«
replace "." with ";"
replace "." with ";
and"
109
109
109
264.140(b)(1)
264.140(b){2)
264.140(b)(3)
*"
Page 16 of 135
DCIDR94J.15 - R*v*«d: 7/23/94
Printed: 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
add new paragraph
regarding
containment buildings
that are required
under 264.1102 to
meet the
requirements for
landfills
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
109
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
264.140(b)(4)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
COST ESTIMATE FOR CLOSURE
change ", and
264.601 through
264.603" to
", 264.601 through
264.603, and
264.1102"
109
264.142(a)
SUBPART K - SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR IGNITABLE OR REACTIVE WASTE
insert "the waste and
impoundment satisfy
all applicable
requirements of 40
CFR Part 268, and"
after "unless"
78
264.229
SUBPART L - WASTE PILES
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR IGNITABLE OR REACTIVE WASTE
insert "the waste and
waste pile satisfy all
applicable
requirements of 40
CFR Part 268, and"
after "unless"
78
264.256
Page 17 of 135
DCLDR94J IS • R«vmd 7/29/94
Printed: 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO, 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
1
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
SUBPART M - LAND TREATMENT
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR IGNITABLE OR REACTIVE WASTE
insert "the waste and
the treatment zone
meet all applicable
requirements of 40
CFR Part 268, and"
after "unless"
78
264.281
SUBPART N - LANDFILLS
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR IGNITABLE OR REACTIVE WASTE
replace "in treated,
rendered, or mixed
before or immediately
after placement in a
landfill so that:" with
"and landfill meet all
applicable
requirements of Part
268, and:"
begin the first
sentence with
"Except for prohibited
wastes which remain
subject to treatment
standards in Subpart
D of Part 268,"
78
78
264.312(a)
264.31 2{b)
*
•
DISPOSAL OF SMALL CONTAINERS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE IN OVERPACKED DRUMS (LAB
PACKS)
add new paragraph
regarding disposal in
compliance with Part
268; requirement for
fiber drums to meet
DOT specifications
and 264.3 16(b>
requirements if
incinerate lab packs
78
264.31 6(f)
m-
Page 18 of 135
DCLDR94J.15 - R*vMd: 7/29/94
Printfld: 12/22/94
-------
1
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
i
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
12
SUBPART DD - CONTAINMENT BUILDINGS
APPLICABILITY .
applies to
owners/operators
storing or treating
hazardous waste in
units designed and
operated under
264.1101; effective
February 18, 1993,
but may notify
Regional
Administrator of
earlier time; not
subject to definition
of land disposal in
RCRA 3004(k)
provided unit:
is a completely
enclosed, self-
supporting structure
designed and
constructed as
specified
has a primary barrier
designed to
withstand movement
of personnel, wastes
and handling
equipment within unit
if used to manage
liquids:
109
109
109
109
264.1100
264.1100{a)
-
264.1100(b)
264.1100{c)
Page 19 of 135
DCLDR94J.1S - RvvMd: 7/29/94
Print** 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
primary barrier
designed and
constructed to
prevent migration of
hazardous
constituents into
barrier
liquid collection
system to minimize
accumulation of liquid
on primary barrier
secondary
containment system
to prevent hazardous
constituent migration
into barrier; leak
detection and liquid
collection as
specified; variance
under 264. 1101 (b)(4)
controls to prevent
fugitive dust
emissions to meet
o a A 1 1 ^\ 1 1 f*\ i 1 \/!\j i
^•D^T* I I ^J 1 iwll 1 fliVJ
standards
designed and
operated to ensure
containment and
prevent tracking of
materials from unit by
personnel or
equipment
*"
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
109
109
109
109
109
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
264.1100(C){1)
264.1100(c)(2)
264.1 100(c)(3)
264.1100(d)
264.1100(6)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
•
DESIGN AND OPERATING STANDARDS
all containment
buildings must
comply with
following design
standards:
109
264.1101(a)
A-
E» on t«iC
Page 2O of 135
DCLDR94J.15 - R«v««d: 7/29/94
12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
completely enclosed
as specified
design and
construction of floor.
containment walls
and secondary
containment system;
unit of sufficient
structural strength to
prevent collapse or
failure; chemically
compatible surfaces;
standards for judging
structural integrity
requirements; when
exception for light-
weight doors and
windows will apply:
provide effective
barrier against
fugitive dust
emissions under
264.1101{cH1)(»v>
unit designed and
operated so that
wastes do not
contact openings
no placement of
incompatible wastes
or treatment reagents
that could cause unit
or secondary
containment system
to leak, corrode or
otherwise fail
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
109
109
109
109
109
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
264.1101(aH1)
264.1 101 (a)(2)
264.1101(aH2Hi}
264.1 101 (a){2)
(ii)
264.1101(a){3)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN.
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
Page 21 of 135
DCLDR94J.15 • RcviMd: 7/29/94
Pnnttd: 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
must have primary
barrier designed to
withstand movement
of personnel, waste
and handling
equipment in unit
during unit operating
life, as appropriate for
waste characteristics
requirements for
hazardous waste
containing free liquids
or treated with free
liquids:
primary barrier to
prevent migration of
hazardous
constituents into the
barrier
liquid collection and
removal system to
minimize
accumulation of liquid
on primary barrier:
primary barrier sloped
to drain liquids to
collection system
liquids and waste
collected and
removed to minimize
hydraulic head on
containment system
at earliest practicable
time
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
109
109
109
109
109
109
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
264.110Ka)(4)
264.110Kb)
264.11 01 (b)(1)
264.1101(b){2)
264.1101(b){2){5)
264.1 101 (b)(2)
(ii)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
•
•
Page 22 of 135
DCLDR94J.15 - RsvMd 7/29/94
Pnm«J 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
secondary
containment system
to prevent hazardous
constituent migration
into barrier; leak
detection and liquid
collection as specified
what must be
installed at a
minimum to satisfy
leak detection
component of
secondary
containment system
constructed with 1 %
or greater bottom
slope
granular, synthetic, or
geonet drainage
materials as specified
if treatment
conducted in building,
treatment area
designed to prevent
releases to other
portions of building
secondary
containment
construction
materials
specifications;
requirements for use
of containment
building as tank
secondary
containment system
/
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
109
109
109
109
109
109
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
264.11 01 (b)(3)
264.1101{b)(3)(i}
264.1101(b)(3>(i)
(A)
264.110Kb}(3)(i)
(B)
264.1101(b}(3)
(ii)
264.1101(b)(3)
(iii)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
Page 23 of 135
DCLDR94J.15 - R*v««l 7/29/94
Pnnt.d 17/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
for existing units
other than 90-day
generator units,
Regional
Administrator delay
of secondary
containment
requirement if
demonstrated that
unit substantially
meets Subpart DD
standards; for
demonstration,
owner/operator must:
1 3 provide written notice
by February 18,
1 993; what notice
must contain
respond to Regional
Administrator
comments within 30
days
if approved, fulfill
terms of revised
plans
owners and operators
of all containment
buildings must:
use controls and
practices to ensure
containment of
hazardous waste
within unit; at a
minimum:
maintain primary
barrier as specified
/
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
109
109
109
109
109
109
109
FEDERAL RCHA CITATION
264.1101(b)(4)
264.11 01 (b)(4)(i)
264.11 01
-------
1
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.OO-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
maintain level of
stored/treated
hazardous waste as
specified
take measures to
prevent tracking of
hazardous waste out
of unit; equipment
decontamination
area; rinsate
collection and
management
take measures to
control fugitive dust
emissions; maintain
paniculate collection
devices as specified;
when "no visible
emissions" must be
maintained
certification by
qualified registered
professional engineer;
for units in operation
prior to February 18,
1993, certification
placed in operating
record or on-site files
no later than 60 days
after date of initial
operation; after
February 18, 1993,
PE certification
required prior to
operation of unit
/
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
109
109
109
109
.•
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
264.11 01 (c)(1)
(ii)
264.1101(c)(1)
(iii)
264.1101{c)(1)
(iv)
264.1 101 (c)(2)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
Page 25 of 135
DCLDR94J.1S - Rtvawl: 7/29/94
Printed: 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA IS
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
prompt repairs of unit
throughout active life
as specified,
according to the
following procedures:
detection of condition
that has led to a
release; leakage from
primary barrier;
owner or operator
must:
enter record of
discovery in facility
operating record
immediately remove
portion of
containment building
affected by the
condition from
service
determine steps to be
taken for repair,
remove leakage from
secondary collection
system and establish
schedule for cleanup
and repairs
within 7 days, notify
Regional
Administrator of
condition; within 14
working days,
provide written notice
to Regional
Administrator; what
written notice must
include
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
109
109
109
109
109
109
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
264.1101(c){3)
264.1101(c)(3Ki)
264.1101(c)(3)(i)
(A)
264.1101(c)(3)(i)
(B)
264.1101(c)(3Hi)
(C)
264.11 01 (c){3)(i)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
•
14
Page 26 of 135
DCLDR94J.15 • R*v«*d: 7/29/94
Piwrtwi 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
Regional
Administrator must
review notice.
determine extent to
which unit must be
removed from service
during repairs, and
notify owner/operator
of determination and
rationale in writing
written notification to
Regional
Administrator on
completion of repair
and cleanup;
verification by a
qualified, registered
professional engineer
that repairs and
cleanup are in
compliance with
264.1101(c)(3)(i)(D)
plan
what must be
inspected and
recorded in facility's
operating records, at
least once every
seven days
for containment
buildings that contain
areas both with and
without secondary
containment, the
owner/operator must:
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
109
109
109
109
FEDERAL RCAA CITATION
264.1101(0(3)
(ii)
264.1101(0(3)
(iii)
264.1101(c) (4)
264. 11 01 (d)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
Page 27 of 135
DCLDfWJ.15 -RffriMl: 7/29/94
Primed: 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
design and operate
each area in
accordance with
264.1101(a)-(c)
requirements
take measures to
prevent release of
liquids or wet
materials into areas
without secondary
containment
maintain in facility's
operating log a.
written description of
operating procedures
used to maintain
integrity of areas
without secondary
containment
Regional
Administrator waiver
of secondary
containment
requirements; what
owner/operator must
demonstrate
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
109
109
109
109
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
264.1 101 (d)(1)
264.1101(d){2)
264.11 01
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
if 264.1102(8)
requirements met and
not all contaminated
subsoils can be
removed or
decontaminated,
close facility and
perform post-closure
care as for landfill
under 264.310;
owner/operator must
meet 264 Subpart G
& H requirements for
landfills
reserved
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
109
109
FEDERAL RCHA CITATION
264.1102U))
264.1103-
264.1110
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
PART 265 - INTERIM STATUS STANDARDS FOR OWNERS AND OPERATORS OF HAZARDOUS
WASTE TREATMENT. STORAGE. AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES
SUBPART A - GENERAL
PURPOSE, SCOPE, AND APPLICABILITY
change "." to V;
add phrase regarding
compliance with
265.17(b) if owner or
operator is diluting
hazardous ignitable
wastes or corrosive
wastes to remove
characteristic before
land disposal
9 add new paragraph
regarding facilities to
which Part 265
applies; Part 268
standards are
material conditions of
the 265 standards
124
34,78
265.1 |c)(10)
265.1(e)
-
Page 29 of 135
OCLDR94J.1S - R*vM: 7/29/94
PIWIM* 12/22/34
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
FEDERAL RCflA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALEUT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
SUBPART B - GENERAL FACILITY STANDARDS
GENERAL WASTE ANALYSIS
insert "Part 268";
add sentence
regarding what
information, at a
minimum, the waste
analysis must contain
revise comment
following
subparagraph (a)(2)
as follows: remove
"or all" after "supply
part"; add ", except
as otherwise
specified in 40 CFR
268.7{b) and (c)." to
the second sentence
insert "268.7"
add new paragraph
and subparagraphs
regarding exempt
surface impoundment
plan specifications
sampling
impoundment
contents
analysis procedures
annual removal of
specific residues;
criteria:
do not meet
treatment standards
of Part 268, Subpart
D
34,102
78
34
34
34
34
34,
39,50
50
265.13(a)<1)
265.13(a)(2)
265.13(b){6)
265.13(b)(7)
265.13(b)(7)(i)
265.13(b)(7)(ii)
265.13(b)(7)(iii)
265.13(bM7)(iii)
(A)
t
10
Page 30 of 135
OCLDR94J.1S - RmiMd: 7/29/94
Print.* 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
where no treatment
standards have been
established
prohibited disposal of
residues under
268.32 or RCRA
3004(d)
prohibited disposal of
residues under
268.33(f)
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
50
50
50
FEDERAL HCRA CITATION
265.13(b)(7)(iii)
(B)
265.13(b)(7)(iii)
(B)W
265.13(b)(7)(iii)
(B)(2)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
SUBPART E - MANIFEST SYSTEM, RECORDKEEPING, AND REPORTING
OPERATING RECORD
add ' 268.4(8)' and
•268.7-
add new paragraph;
records for each
shipment placed in
units under a 268.5
extension, a 268.6
petition, or a 268.8
certification; 268.7(a)
generation notice
add new paragraph;
off-site treatment
facility requirements
add new paragraph;
on-site treatment
facility requirements
add new paragraph;
off-site land disposal
facility requirements
add new paragraph;
on-site land disposal
facility requirements
34
34,50
34.50
34,50
34,50
34,50
265.73(b)(3)
265.73(b)(8)
265.73(b)(9)
265.73(b)(10)
265.73(b)O1)
265.73{b)U2)
,
Page 31 of 135
DCLDR94J.15 -Rcviwd: 7/29/94
Printed: 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
add new paragraph;
off-site storage
facility requirements
add new paragraph;
on-site storage
facility requirements
CHECKLIST
niTTfMtUft*
^E^cnDivC
50
50
FEDERAL RCflA CITATION
265.73(b)(13)
265.73(b)(14)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
SUBPART G - CLOSURE AND POST-CLOSURE
APPLICABILITY
remove "and" from
end of paragraph
remove "and" from
end of paragraph
replace "." with
"; and"
add new paragraph
addressing
containment buildings
that are required
under 265, 11 02 to
meet the
requirements for
landfills
109
109
109
109
265.110(bM1)
265.1 10(b)(2)
265.110(b){3)
265.1lO(b){4)
1
»
CLOSURE PERFORMANCE STANDARD
change "and
265.404" to
", 265.404, and
264.1102"
109
265.1 11(c)
CLOSURE PLAN; AMENDMENT OF PLAN
15
replace "§§ 265.90
et seq." with
"subpart F of this
part, §§"; change
", and 265.404" to
", 265.404, and
264.1102"
109
265.112(dM4)
'
J*_
Page 32 of 135
DCLDR94J 15 • ftovMM: 7/29/94
Piwt«d 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
CHECKUST
Bi1,"-»-iieij/Hr
ncrcncnwc
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV.
ALENT
LESS
STWN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
SUBPART H - FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS
APPLICABILITY
in 265.140{b) insert
":" after "of";
reorganize rest of
paragraph after
"apply to" into
265.140(b)(1)
[disposal facilities]
and 265.140(b)(2)
[tank systems]; add
265.140(b)(3)
addressing
containment buildings
109
265.1 40 (b)
265.140(b)<1>
265.140(b)(2)
265.140(bK3)
COST ESTIMATE FOR CLOSURE
replace "of § i
265.178" with "in §§
265.178"; change
"and 265.404" to
", 265.404 and
265.1102"
109
265.142(a)
Page 33 of 135
DCLDRS4J.1S - FteviMd: 7/29/94
Printed: 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
' as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
EQUIV-
ALENT
STATE ANALOG IS:
LESS
STNN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
SUBPART K - SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
DESIGN AND OPERATING REQUIREMENTS
add new paragraph
regarding surface
impoundments newly
subject to RCRA
§ 3005 (j)(1) must be
in compliance with
265.221
-------
1
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9641.00*21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
CHECKLIST
— — _ mHgjm jLtftf
ncrcncnvc
FEDERAL RCRA OTATtON
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
SUBPART M - LAND TREATMENT
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR IGNITABLE OR REACTIVE WASTE
insert "the waste and
treatment zone meet
all applicable
requirements of 40
CFR Part 268, and"
after "unless"
78
265.281
SUBPART N - LANDFILLS
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR IGNITABLE OR REACTIVE WASTE
replace "is treated,
rendered, or mixed
before or immediately
after placement in a
landfill so that:" with
"and landfill meets all
applicable
requirements of 40
CFR Part 268, and:"
begin the first
sentence with
"Except for prohibited
wastes which remain
subject to treatment
standards in Subpart
D of Part 268,"
78
78
265.312{a)
265.31 2(b)
/
DISPOSAL OF SMALL CONTAINERS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE IN OVERPACKED DRUMS (LAB
PACKS)
add new paragraph
regarding disposal in
compliance with Part
268; requirement for
fiber drums to meet
DOT specifications
and 265.3 16(b)
requirements if
incinerate lab packs
78
f
265.316(f)
Page 35 of 135
DCLOR94J.15 -RnriMd: 7/29/94
Printtd: 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9641.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
CHECK1JST
REFERENCE
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
12
SUBPART DD • CONTAINMENT BUILDINGS
APPLICABILITY
applies to
owners/operators
storing or treating
hazardous waste in
units designed and
operated under
265.1101; effective
February 18, 1993,
but may notify
Regional
Administrator of
earlier time; not
subject to definition
of land disposal in
RCRA 3004(k)
provided unit:
is a completely
enclosed, self
supporting structure
designed and
constructed as
specified
has a primary barrier
designed to
withstand movement
of personnel, wastes
and handling
equipment within unit
if used to manage
liquids:
109
109
109
109
265.1100
265.1100(a)
265.1100(b)
265.1100(c)
.*_
Page 36 of 135
OCLOR94J.15
7/29/9*
Pnnted: 12/22/94
-------
1
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.OO-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUREMENTS
primary barrier
designed and
constructed to
prevent migration of
hazardous
constituents into
barrier
liquid collection
system to minimize
accumulation of liquid
on primary barrier
secondary
containment system
to prevent hazardous
constituent migration
into barrier; leak
detection and liquid
collection as
specified; variance
under 265. 11 01
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
completely enclosed
as specified
design and
construction of floor,
containment walls
and secondary
containment system;
unit of sufficient
structural strength to
prevent collapse or
failure; chemically
compatible surfaces;
standards for judging
structural integrity
requirements; when
exception for light-
weight doors and
windows will apply:
provide effective
barrier against
fugitive dust
emissions under
265.1101
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9641.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
must have primary
barrier designed to
withstand movement
of personnel, waste
and handling
equipment in unit
during unit operating
life, as appropriate for
waste characteristics
requirements for
hazardous waste
containing free liquids
or treated with free
liquids:
primary barrier to
prevent migration of
hazardous
constituents into the
barrier
liquid collection and
removal system to
prevent accumulation
of liquid on primary
barrier:
primary barrier sloped
to drain liquids to
collection system
liquids and waste
collected and
removed to minimize
hydraulic head on
containment system
at earliest practicable
time to protect
human health and
environment
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
109
109
109
109
109
109
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
265.1101(a){4)
265.1101(b)
265.1101{b)(1)
265.1 101 (b)(2)
265.1101(b)(2)
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
secondary
containment system
to prevent hazardous
constituent migration
into barrier; leak ,
detection and liquid
collection as specified
what must be
installed at a
minimum to satisfy
leak detection
component of
secondary
containment system
construct with 1 % or
greater bottom slope
granular, synthetic, or
geonet drainage
materials as specified
if treatment
conducted in building,
treatment area
designed to prevent
releases to other
portions of building
secondary
containment
construction
materials
specifications;
requirements for use
of containment
building as tank
secondary
containment system
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
109
109
109
109
109
109
FEDERAL HCRA CITATION
265.1 101 (b)(3)
265.11 01 (b)(3)(i)
265.1101{bM3)(i)
(A)
265.1 101 (b)(3)(i)
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9841 .OO-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
for existing units
other than 90-day
generator units,
Regional
Administrator delay
of secondary
containment
requirement if
demonstrated that
unit substantially
meets Subpart DD
standards; for
demonstration,
owner/operator must:
provide written notice
by February 18,
1 993; what notice
must contain
respond to Regional
Administrator
comments within 30
days
if approved, fulfill
terms of revised
plans
owners and operators
of all containment
buildings must:
use controls and
practices to ensure
containment of
hazardous waste
within unit; at a
minimum:
maintain primary
barrier as specified
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
109
109
109
109
109
109
109
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
265.1101(b)(4)
265.1101{b){4)(i)
265.1101(6X4)
(ii)
265.1 101 (b)(4)
(iii)
265.1 101 (c)
265.1101(C)(1)
265.1101(c)(1)(i)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CfTATION
f
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
Page 41 of 135
DCLDR94J 15 FUvMd 7/29/94
Pnm«dr 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9641.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL HEQUMEMENTS
maintain level of
stored/treated
hazardous waste as
specified
take measures to
prevent tracking of
hazardous waste out
of unit; equipment
decontamination
area; rinsate
collection and
management
take measures to
control fugitive dust
emissions; maintain
particulate collection
devices as specified;
when "no visible
emissions* must be
maintained
certification by
qualified registered
professional engineer;
for units in operation
prior to February 1 8,
1 993, certification
placed in operating
record or on-site files
no later than 60 days
after date of initial
operation; after
February 18, 1993,
PE certification
required prior to
operation of unit
prompt repairs of unit
throughout active life,
according to the
following procedures:
CHECKLIST
nrmyiirr
imwn<*c
109
109
109
109
109
.
FEDERAL ROW CITATION
265.1101(0(1)
(ii)
265.1101(0(1)
(iii)
265.11 01 (cH1)
(iv)
265.1101(0(2)
265.11 01 (O(3)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STNN-
GENT
.
*
MORE
STRM-
GENT
BROADER
m SCOPE
*
^
Page 42 of 135
DCLOA84J.1S - Rwin* 7/29/94
Print** 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9641.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
detection of condition
that has led to a
release; leakage from
primary barrier;
owner or operator
must:
enter record of
discovery in facility
operating record
immediately remove
portion of
containment building
affected by the
condition from
service
determine steps to be
taken for repair;
remove leakage from
secondary collection
system and establish
schedule for cleanup
and repairs
within 7 days, notify
Regional
Administrator of
condition; within 14
working days,
provide written notice
to Regional
Administrator; what
written notice must
include
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
109
109
109
109
109
FEDERAL HCRA CITATION
265.1101(cH3)(i)
265.1101(c)(3)(i)
(A)
265.1101(c)(3)(i)
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9641.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REOMREMENTS
Regional
Administrator must
review notice,
determine extent to
which unit must be
removed from service
during repairs, and
notify owner/operator
of determination and
rationale in writing
written notification of
Regional
Administrator on
completion of repair
and cleanup;
verification by a
qualified, registered
professional engineer
that repairs and
cleanup are in
compliance with
265.1101(c)(3)(i)(D)
plan
what must be
inspected and
recorded in facility's
operating records, at
least once every
seven days
for containment
building that contains
both areas with and
without secondary
containment, the
owner/operator must:
CHECKLIST
QMgHMpUMg
ncncncm^c
109
109
109
109
FEDERAL RCBA CITATION
265.11 01
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
design and operate
each area in
accordance with
265.1101(aHc)
requirements
take measures to
prevent release of
liquids or wet
materials into areas
without secondary
containment
maintain in facility's
operating log a
written description of
operating procedures
used to maintain
integrity of areas
without secondary
containment
Regional
Administrator waiver
of secondary
containment
requirements; what
owner/operator must
demonstrate
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
109
109
109
109
F€D€RAL RCflA CITATION
265.1101{d)<1)
265.1 101 (d)(2)
265.1101(dH3)
265.1101(6}
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
CLOSURE AND POST-CLOSURE CARE
what must be done at
closure; closure plan,
closure activities,
cost estimates, and
financial responsibility
must meet all 265
Subparts G & H
requirements
109
265.1102(a)
Page 45 of 135
OCLDR94J.1S • RmM* 7/29/94
PnntwS: 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
if 265.1102(8)
requirements met and
not all contaminated
soils can be removed
or decontaminated,
close facility and
perform post-closure
care as for landfill
under 265.3 10;
owner/operator must
meet 265 Subparts G
& H requirements for
landfills
reserved
CHECKUST
ncccmrc
rvrcrvnvc
109
109
FEDERAL RCHA CITATION
265.1 102(b)
265.1103-
265.1110
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
Page 46 of 135
DCLDR94J.1S - feviMd: 7/29/9*
Plinlwl: 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9641.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
CHECKUST
nErWnwc
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
PART 266 - STANDARDS FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF SPECIFIC HAZARDOUS WASTES AND
SPECIFIC TYPES OF HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITIES
SUBPART C - RECYCLABLE MATERIALS USED IN A MANNER CONSTITUTING DISPOSAL
APPLICABILITY
add language to
reflect that products
for general public's
use are not subject to
regulation if they
meet treatment
requirements of 268
Subpart D or
prohibition levels of
268.32 or RCRA
3004{d) where no
treatment standards;
delete the word
"constituent" from
the parenthetical
phrase following
"recyclable material";
add sentence
exempting from
regulation commercial
fertilizers produced
for the general
public's use that
contain recyclable
materials; zinc-
containing fertilizers
using K061 not
subject to this
requirement
50,66
»
266.20(b)
PART 268 - LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS
SUBPART A - GENERAL
PURPOSE, SCOPE AND APPLICABILITY
purpose
34
268.1 (a)
Page 47 of .135
OCLDR94J.1S . R*VMd: 7/29/94
Print** 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
i
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
applicability
conditions for
continued land
disposal:
9 persons with an
extension
9 persons with an
exemption
7 wastes that are
hazardous only
because they exhibit
a hazardous
characteristic, and
which are otherwise
prohibited from land
disposal, are not
prohibited from land
disposal if the
wastes:
disposed into a
nonhazardous or
hazardous injection
well as defined in 40
CFR 144.6(a)
do not exhibit any
prohibited
characteristic of
hazardous waste at
the point of injection
8
removed
9
removed
preserve waiver
availability under
121(d)(4)of CERCLA
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
34
34,66
34
34
34,
39,50,
66,78
78
78
34,39,
50,66
39,48,
50,78
50
.
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
268. Kb)
268. 1(c)
268.1 (c)(1)
268.1(c)(2)
268.1(0(3)
/
268.1(0(3X0
-
268.1(O(3)(ii)
268.1(0(4)
268.1(0(5)
268. 1(d)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
r
»
4
•%
Page 48 of 135
DCLDRMJ.1S -fteviMd: 7/29/9*
Print** 12/22/04
-------
1
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541 .OO-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
20
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
wastes which are not
subject to any
provisions of Part
268:
wastes generated by
generators of less
than 100 kg of
hazardous waste or
less than 1 kg of
acute hazardous
waste, as defined in
261.5
waste pesticides that
a farmer disposes
pursuant to 262.70
wastes identified or
listed as hazardous
after November 8,
1984 for which EPA
has not promulgated
land disposal
prohibitions or
treatment standards
de minimis losses to
wastewater
treatment systems of
commercial chemical
product or chemical
intermediates that are
ignitable or corrosive,
and that contain
underlying hazardous
constituents as
defined in 268.2, are
not considered to be
prohibited wastes; de
minimis defined
CHECKUST
REFERENCE
66
66
66
66
124
FEDERAL HCHA CITATION
268.1(6)
268.1(e)(1)
268.1(e)(2)
268.1(e){3)
268.1(e)(4)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
,
.
Page 49 of 135
DCLDR94J.15
- H.v«*d: 7/29/94
Printed: 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.OO-i
SPA 1\
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
land disposal
prohibitions do not
apply to laboratory
wastes displaying the
characteristic of
ignitability or
corrosivity that are
commingled with
other plant
wastewaters under
designated
circumstances: such
wastes at facilities
whose ultimate
discharge is subject
to regulation under
the CWA, provided
the annualized flow
of laboratory
wastewater into
facility's headwork
does not exceed 1 %,
or provided that the
laboratory wastes'
combined annualized
average
concentration does
not exceed one part
per million in the
facility's headwork
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
124
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
268.1(e>(5)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
- " - v
STATE ANALOG IS: \
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
^
»
p^
DEFINITIONS APPLICABLE TO THIS PART
introductory
paragraph regarding
definitions
"halogenated organic
compounds" or
-HOCs"
78
39,78
268.2
268.2O)
Page 50 of 135
DCLDRS4J.15 -Rmtadt 7/29/94
Pmnrt 12/22/9*
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9641.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
21 "hazardous
constituent or
constituents"
21,
22 -land disposal"
"nonwastewaters"
23 "polychlorinated
biphenyls" or "PCBs"
"waste waters"
"F001 , F002, F003,
F004, F005 solvent-
water mixtures"
"K011,K013. K014
wastewaters"
'K 103 and K104
wastewaters"
"debris"
24
removed
"hazardous debris"
"underlying
hazardous
constituent"
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
34,78
34,
39,78
78,83
39,78
78
78,83
78,83
78
78,
83,109
78,
83,109
109
124
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
268. 2(b)
268. 2(c)
268. 2(d)
268.2(e>
268. 2(f)
268.2{f)(1)
268.2(f)(2)
268.2(f){3)
268. 2(g)
268.2(g)(1H8)
268. 2(h)
268.2(0
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
Page 51 of 135
DCLDRS4J.15 • H»»««d: 7/29/94
Printed: 1212219*
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STWN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
DILUTION PROHIBITED AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR TREATMENT
25 except as provided in
268.3(b), dilution not
substitute for
treatment; restriction
regarding
circumvention of
effective dates and
avoidance of
prohibition of Subpart
C or RCRA 3004
permissible forms of
dilution related to
. Sections 307 or 402
oftheCWA;
exception for D003
reactive cyanide
wastewater or
nonwastewater
34,
39,78
78,102
268.3(a)
268. 3(b)
P
t TREATMENT SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT EXEMPTION
when prohibited
wastes may be
treated in a surface
impoundment
treatment occurs in
impoundments
soft hammer wastes
in treatment surface
impoundments that
meet a list of
conditions:
34
34
34,
39,50
268.4(a)
268.4(a)(1)
268.4(a)(2)
Page 52 of 135
OCLOR94J 15 - RwnMd: 7/29/94
PmiMd. 12/22/9*
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
sampling and testing
requirements for
wastes with and
without treatment
standards;
supernatant and
sludge samples
tested separately
annual removal of
specific residues;
residues subject to
valid certification;
flow-through
standard of removal
for supernatant
requirements for
subsequent
management of
treatment residues in
another
impoundment;
prohibited unless
certification under
268.8 and standards
of 268.8(a) are met
recordkeeping
requirements must be
specified in the
facility's waste
analysis pian
9 design requirements/
exemptions
exempt under
264.221 (d) or (e) or
265. 221 (c) or (d)
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
50
50
50
50
34
34
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
268.4(aK2){i)
268.4(a)(2)(ii)
268.4(aM2)
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
conditions under
which Administrator
grants waiver of
requirements; meets
RCRA §3005(j)(2)
modification granted
on basis of a
demonstration of no
migration into
groundwater or
surface water at any
future time; satisfies
RCRA §3005 (JK11)
no migration
submittal of written
certification and
waste analysis plan
evaporation of
hazardous
constituents not
considered treatment
for exemption
purposes
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
34
34
34
39
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
268.4(a)(3)(ii>
268.4
268.4(a)(3)(ii)(B)
268.4(a)(3)(ii)(C)
268.4(a)(3)(iii)
268.4(a>(4)
268.4(b)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
1
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
\
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
9
9
9
******••••*«•'
Guidance note: 268.5 is NOT DELEGABLE. States should see Note 3 at the beginning of this
checklist regarding how to incorporate this section into their code.
PROCEDURES FOR CASE-BY-CASE EXTENSIONS TO AN EFFECTIVE DATE
application to EPA
Administrator for an
extension to effective
date of any Part 268,
Subpart C restriction;
what the applicant
must demonstrate:
34
268. 5{a)
Page 54 of 135
DCLDRS4J.15 • R*VM*
7/29/94
12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
good-faith effort to
locate and contract
with treatment.
recovery, or disposal
facilities nationwide
to manage waste
according to Subpart
C effective date
binding contractual
commitment to
construct or provide
alternate treatment.
recovery (e.g..
recycling), or disposal
capacity that meets
Subpart D treatment
standards;
requirements when
no treatment
standards
demonstration that
alternative capacity
cannot reasonably be
available by effective
date due to
circumstances
beyond applicant's
.control; how this
must be
demonstrated
capacity being
constructed or
provided by applicant
must be sufficient to
manage entire
quantity of waste
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
34
34,39
34
34
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
268.5(a)(1)
268.5(a){2)
268.5OH3)
268.5(a){4)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
V
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
Page 55 of 135
DCLDR94J.1S - R.v*Kl: 7/29/94
Prinu* 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REOAJHENeNTS
detailed schedule for
obtaining required
permits or outline of
how and when
alternate capacity will
be available
arranged for adequate
capacity during
extension and
documented in all site
locations where
wastes will be
managed
surface impoundment
or landfill used must
meet 268.5(h)(2>
requirements
certification by
authorized
representative signing
an application
Administrator may
request additional
information
extension applies only
to waste generated at
individual facility
covered by extension
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
34
34
34
34
34
34
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
268.5(a)(5)
268.5(a)(6)
268.5(a)<7)
268. 5(b)
268.5(C)
268. 5(d)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
i
1
BROADER
IN SCOPE
»-
Page 56 of 135
DCLDR94J.1S - toviMd: 7/29/94
Printed: 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO.
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
9541.00-21
SPA 15
. FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
Administrator may
grant extension of up
to 1 year from
effective date;
extension for 1
additional year if
268.5
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
conditions for
disposal in landfill or
surface impoundment
regardless of whether
unit is existing, new,
replacement or lateral
extension
interim status landfill
requirements
permitted landfill
requirements
interim status surface
impoundment
requirements
permitted surface
impoundment
requirements
26 surface
impoundments newly
subject to RCRA
3006(j); compliance
with 265 Subpart F
within 12 months and
with 265.221(a), (c),
and (d) within 48
months; effect of a
national capacity
variance
26 requirements for
landfills disposing of
specified PCB waste
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
1
34,50,
66
34
34,109
34,39
34,109
109
39,109
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
268.5
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9S41.OO-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
pending decision on
application.
compliance with all
legal disposal
restrictions once
effective date has
been reached
CHECKUST
REFERENCE
34
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
268. 5(i)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
**«*•********«**«»»******»*«*******•»***•**********«****«************«***<
• »»»»••»«»»»»»*•»»»»»#••»••«»•»»»» »•••«»••••««••••• ***»*******«********«4
********************** • **«***«**»*««***********«***««*****««******»*****4
Guidance note: 268.6 is NOT DELEGABLE. States should see Note 3 at the beginning of this
checklist regarding how to incorporate this section into their code.
PETITIONS TO ALLOW LAND DISPOSAL OF A WASTE PROHIBITED UNDER SUBPART C OF
PART 268
submit petition to
Administrator;
demonstration of no
waste migration;
demonstration
components
identify specific unit
and waste
waste analysis
comprehensive
disposal unit
characterization
monitoring plan
detecting migration at
the earliest time
34
34
34
34
50
268. 6(a)
268.6(a)(1)
268.6(a)(2)
268.6(a)(3)
268.6(a)(4)
Page 59 of 135
DCLDR94J.1S - R.vMd: 7/29/94
Printed: 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
• SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
sufficient information
to assure
Administrator that
owner/operator is in
compliance with
other applicable
Federal, State and
local laws
demonstration
criteria:
data must be
accurate and
reproducible
Administrator
approved sampling,
testing and
estimation techniques
model calibration;
models verified with
actual data
quality
assurance/control
plan approved by
Administrator
uncertainty analysis
what each petition
must include:
monitoring plan
including description
of monitoring
program to verify
continued compliance
with variance;
information which
must be included
media monitored
CHECKUST
50
50
50
34
34
34
34
50
50
50
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
268.6(a)(5)
268.6(b)
268.6(b)(1)
268.6(b)(2)
268.6(b)(3)
268.6(b){4)
268.6(b)(5)
268. 6(c)
268.6(1)
268.6(c)(1)(i)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
•-
"
A-
27
Page 60 of 135
DCLDRS4J.1S - R««Md: 7/29/94
Printed: 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
type of monitoring
monitoring station
location
monitoring interval
specific hazardous
constituents to be
monitored
monitoring program
implementation
schedule
monitoring station
equipment
sampling and
analytical techniques
employed
data
recording/reporting
procedures
268.6(c){1)
monitoring program
must be in place by
Administrator-
specified time period,
as part of approval of
the petition, prior to
prohibited waste
receipt at unit
268.6(c)(1)
monitoring data sent
to Administrator
according to
monitoring plan must
be according to
approved format and
schedule
CHECKLIST
HLlHkHcNCE
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
268.6(c)(1 Mil)
268.6
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9S41.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
monitoring data as
per 268.6(c){1)
monitoring plan must
be kept in on-site
operating record
criteria the 268. 6{c)
(1) monitoring
program must meet:
Administrator
approval for all
sampling, testing,
and analytical data;
data accurate and
reproducible
Administrator
approval of all
estimation and
monitoring
techniques
QA/QC plan for all
aspects of monitoring
program provided to
and approved by
Administrator
petition submitted to
Administrator
reporting of changes
at unit and/or
surrounding
environment that
significantly depart
from variances and
affect migration
potential
CHECKLIST
DCGBBCIJCC
ncrcTKnuc
50
50
50
50
50
34,50
50
FEDERAL RCHA CITATION
268.6(c)(4)
268.6(c)(5)
268.6(c)(5)(i)
268.6(c)(5Mii)
268.6(c)(5)(iii)
268. 6(d)
268. 6(e)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
28
29
Page 62 of 135
DCLDR94J1S - FWvMd: 7/29/94
Pnmcd: 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
changes to unit
design, construction
or operation proposed
in writing and a
demonstration to
Administrator 30
days prior to change;
Administrator makes
determination if
petition is invalidated
and determines
appropriate response;
Administrator
approval before
changes can be made
within 1 0 days of
discovering change.
written notification to
Administrator if
condition is not as
predicted or modeled
in petition;
Administrator decides
if change requires
further action
30 owner/operator
responsibilities if
hazardous waste
migration:
immediate suspension
of prohibited waste
receipt
within 1 0 days
written notification to
Administrator
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
50
50
50
50,66
50
„•*
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
268.6{e)(1)
268.6(e)(2)
268. 6(f)
268.6(f)(1)
268.6(f){2)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
•
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT '
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
Page 63 of 135
DCUDR94J.15 • R»v*»d 7/29/94
Pnnt«d: 12/22(94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd) —
renew. REQUIREMENTS
Administrator
decision within 60
days as to continued
receipt of prohibited
waste; Administrator
determines if further
examination of any
migration warranted
31 signed statement
31 Administrator may
request additional
information
31 waste unit to which
petition applies
31 Administrator gives
public notice in
Federal Register: final
decision in Federal
Register
31 term of petition
31 requirements prior to
Administrator's
decision
31 petition granted by
Administrator does
not relieve
responsibilities under
RCRA
32 noneligibility of
certain liquid PCB
wastes for "no
migration" petitions
under 268.6
CHECKUST
REFERENCE
50
34,50
34,50
34,50
34,50
34,50
34,50
34,50
39,50
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
268.6(f)(3)
268. 6(g)
268.6
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9841.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
CHECKUST
REFERENCE
FEDERAL RCflA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
WASTE ANALYSIS AND RECORDKEEPING
9, generator determines
33 whether listed waste
is a restricted waste;
268.32 exception; if
characteristic is
exhibited, test extract
using 268, Appendix
IX Method or use
knowledge of waste
to determine whether
restricted from land
disposal; what the
generator must do if
he determines that
his waste displays
characteristic of
ignitability or
corrosivity and is
prohibited under
268.37
if generator is
managing restricted
waste that does not
meet applicable
treatment standards,
must notify treatment
or storage facility of
appropriate treatment
standards
34,39,
50,83,
124
34,
39,50
268.7(3)
268.7(3)0)
-
-
Page 65 of 135
DCLDR94X15
R*V«K* 7(29/94
12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
information the notice
must include
if managing restricted
waste that can be
land disposed without
further treatment,
notice and
certification to
treatment, storage, or
land disposal facility;
generators of
hazardous debris that
is excluded from the
definition of
hazardous waste
under 261. 3{e) (2) not
subject to notice and
certification
information required
in notice to
treatment, storage or
land disposal facility
certification
signature/statement
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
34
34,39,
78,83,
124
34,109
109
34,109
34,39,
50,109
34
34,39,
78,83
34
34,39
.
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
288.7(8)0 )(i)
268.7(a)(1)(ii)
268.7(a)O)(iii)
268.7(aH1)(iv)
268.7(a)(1 )(v)
268.7(a)(2)
268.7{a)(2)(i)
268.7(aK2)(i)(A)
268.7(a)(2)(i)(B)
268.7(a)(2MiMC)
268.7(a)(2)(i)(D)
268.7(a){2)(ii)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN score
4fc
^Br
•
34,
35
Page 66 of 135
DCLDR94J.15 - RaviMd: 7/29/94
Printed: 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
for waste subject to
exemption from
prohibition (such as a
case-by-case 268.5
extension, 268.6
exemption or Subpart
C nationwide
capacity variance) on
land disposal method
used for the waste,
notice to receiving
facility that waste is
not prohibited from
land disposal
IllIUIHIilUUIl 11 IV IIUIIUC)
must include
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
34,
50,66
50
50,
78,83
50
50,109
109
50,109
.-
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
»
268.7OH3)
268.7(a)(3)(i)
268.7(a)(3)(ii)
268.7(a)(3)(iii)
268.7(a)(3)(iv)
268.7{a)(3)(v)
268.7(a)(3)(vi)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
-
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
36
Page 67 of 135
DCLDR94X15 -fl*v»Mi: 7(29/94
Pnmwl 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FBJERAI. REQUIREMENTS
37 for prohibited waste
managed in tanks,
containers, or
containment buildings
under 262.34 and
treated to meet 268
Subpart D standards,
waste analysis plan
to be developed,
followed and kept on-
site; generators
. treating hazardous
> debris under 268.45,
Table 1 alternative
treatment standards
not subject to
analysis requirements
38 waste analysis plan
based on detailed
chemical and physical
analysis of
representative
sample; contain
information necessary
to treat waste in
accordance with 268
requirements
38 file plan with EPA
Regional
Administrator or
authorized State 30
days prior to
treatment; delivery
verified
38 compliance with
268.7(a)(2)
notification
requirements for
wastes shipped off-
site
CHECUJST
REFERENCE
50,66,
78,109
50,78
50,78
50,78
_.
FEDERAL ftCRA CITATION
268.7OH4)
268.7(a)(4Mi)
268.7(a)(4)(ii)
268.7{a)(4)(iii)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
•
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
'
8ROADER
m SCOPE
_
— m-
Page 68 of 135
OCUDR94J 15 -R»va*d: 7/29/94
PrmMd: 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO.
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
9541.00-21
SPA 15
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
38 removed
9,39 maintenance of data
supporting knowledge
of waste; retention of
waste analysis data
on-site in files
conditions under
which a generator,
managing a restricted
waste excluded from
the definition of
hazardous or solid
waste, must place a
one-time notice in the
facility's file
containing specified
\ information
40 five-year retention
period for notices,
certifications,
demonstrations, etc..
produced relative to
268.7; extensions
during enforcement
actions; requirements
apply to solid wastes
even when hazard
characteristic is
removed prior to
disposal or when
waste excluded from
definition of
hazardous or solid
waste in 261.2-
261 .6 or exempted
from Subtitle C
regulation subsequent
to the point of
generation
.
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
50,78
34,50
83
50,83
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
268.7(aM4Miv)
268.7(a)(5)
268.7{a)(6)
268.7(a)(7)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
Page 69 of 135
DCLDR94J.15
- R«viMd: 7/29/94
Print** 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9641.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDBVU. REQUMBCNTS
notice for a generator
managing a lab pack
that contains wastes
identified in Appendix
IV if use alternative
treatment standards
under 268.42;
268.7(a)(5}&(6)
compliance;
certification
notice for a generator
managing a lab pack
that contains organic
wastes specified in
Appendix V if use
alternate treatment
standard under
268.42; 268. 7
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
testing of 268.32 or
RCRA 3004(d)
prohibited wastes not
subject to Subpart D
treatment standards
testing for wastes
with treatment
standards expressed
as concentrations in
waste
notice with each
shipment by
treatment facility to
land disposal facility;
however, debris
excluded from the
hazardous waste
definition at 261 .3(e)
is subject to
notification and
certification under
268. 7(d)
inlnfnnstimt tfrio nntioo
iniorniaiion ine nuiii>t>
must include
CHECKLIST
«MnraMpy/*f;
^Brcncni«c
50
50
34,
50,109
34,50
34,39,
50,
78,83,
124
34,50
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
268.7
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REOUREMENTS
42 certification of each
shipment; however,
debris excluded from
the definition of
hazardous waste
under 261. 3(e) is
subject to notification
and certification
under 268.7(d)
42 certification
requirements for
wastes with
treatment standards
expressed as
concentrations in the
waste extract or in
the waste, or for
wastes prohibited
under 268.32 or
RCRA Section
3004(d) which do not
have 268, Subpart D
treatment standards
42 certification
requirements for
wastes with
treatment standards
expressed as
technologies
certification
requirements for
wastes with
treatment standards
expressed as
concentrations in the
waste pursuant to
268.43
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
34,39,
50,109
34,39,
50,78
34,50
78
,
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
268.7{b){5)
268.7(b)(5)(i)
268.7(b)(5)(ii)
268.7(bM5)(iii)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRW-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
4^
^^f-'
Page 72 of 135
DCLDR94J.15
7/29/94
Print** 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
compliance with
generator notice and
certification
requirements if waste
sent offsite
43 no 268.7(b>(4)
notification for
recyclable materials
used in a manner
constituting disposal
and subject to
266.20(b); with each
shipment 268.7(b)(5)
certification and
268.7
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
removed
notification and .
certification
requirements for
generators or treaters
who first claim that
hazardous debris is
excluded from the
definition of
hazardous waste
under 261 .3(0)
one-time notification
including specified
information
when notification
must be updated
how the owner or
operator must
document and certify
compliance with
Table 1 , 268.45
treatment standards
CHECKLIST
66,78
109
109
109
109
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
268.7(c)(4)
268. 7
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9641.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
good faith generator
effort to contract
with treatment and
recovery facilities
providing greatest
environmental benefit
specific requirements
for generator if no
practically available
treatment for waste:
prior to initial
shipment,
demonstration to
Regional
Administrator
containing specified
lists and written
discussion;
certification; waste
shipment
for initial shipment,
demonstration and
certification sent to
receiving facilities;
certification only for
subsequent
shipments; generator
recordkeeping and
five-year retention
specific requirements
for generator if there
are practically
available treatments
for waste:
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
50
50,66
50,66
50,66
50,66
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
268.8(a)(1)
268.8(a)(2)
268.8{a)(2)(i)
268.8(a)(2)(ii)
268.8(a)(3)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS.
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
Page 75 of 135
DCLDR94J.15 -teviMd: 7/29/94
Print** 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9641.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
prior to initial
shipment.
demonstration to
Regional
Administrator
containing specified
lists and written
discussion;
certification; waste
shipment
with initial shipment
copy of
demonstration and
certification sent to
receiving facilities;
certification only for
subsequent
shipments; generator
recordkeeping and
five-year retention
46 where there is
practically available
treatment for waste
prior to disposal,
copy of
demonstration and
certification
submitted to
receiving facility with
initial shipment;
certification only for
subsequent
shipments; generator
recordkeeping and
five-year retention
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
66
66
50
1
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
268.8(aH3)(i)
268.8(a)(3)(ii)
268.8(a)(4)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
m SCOPE
P^
Page 76 of 135
DCLDR94J.15 - RmiMd: 7/29/94
Printed: 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
additional information
for certification if
requested by Regional
Administrator;
submittal of new
demonstration and
certification as
provided in 268.8(a)
to the receiving
facility
notification when any
change in conditions
forming basis of
certification occurs
invalidation when
Regional
Administrator finds
practically available
treatment method or
a method yielding
greater environmental
benefit than certified
when certification is
invalidated, generator
must cease shipment,
communicate with
facilities receiving
waste, and keep
records of
communication
receiving treatment,
recovery or storage
facilities keep copy of
generator's
demonstration and
certification
CHECKUST
REFERENCE
50
50,66
50
50
50
FEDERAL HCRA CITATION
268. 8(b)
268.8(b)(1)
268.8{b)(2)
268.8(b)(3)
268. 8(c)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRtN.
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
Page 77 of 135
DCLDR94J 15 - R*v«*d: 7/29/94
Printed: 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
receiving treatment,
storage or recovery
facility certify waste
treated according to
generator's
demonstration
for initial shipment.
treatment, recovery
or storage facility
must send copy of
generator's
demonstration and
certification(s) to
facility receiving
waste or treatment
residues; certification
only for subsequent
shipments, if
certification
conditions remain
unchanged
disposal facility must
assure certification
prior to disposal in
landfill or surface
impoundment unit
and units in
accordance with
268.5(h)(2) for
wastes prohibited
under 268.33W
wastes may be
disposed in landfill or
surface impoundment
meeting 268.5(h)(2)
requirements if
certified and treated
CHECKLIST
Rc^cHENCE
50
50,66
50,66
50
•
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
268.8(c)(1)
268.8(c}(2)
268. 8(d)
268.8(e)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS.
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
*
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
Page 78 of 135
DCLOR94J.15 - Rwmd: 7/29/94
Printed: 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9841.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
SPECIAL RULES REGARDING WASTES THAT EXHIBIT A CHARACTERISTIC
determination of
applicable treatment
standards under
Subpart D, Part 268
by initial generator of
a solid waste; code
designation and
exceptions;
conditions under
which generator must
determine what
underlying hazardous
characteristics are
reasonably expected
to be present in the
waste
the treatment
standard for the
waste code listed in
40 CFR Part 261 ,
Subpart D will
operate for wastes
both listed under
Subpart D, Part 261
and exhibit a
characteristic under
Subpart C, Part 261;
conditions under
which treatment
standards for all
applicable listed and
characteristic waste
codes must be met
78,83,
124
78
268.9(3}
268. 9(b)
..
-
Page 79 of 135
DCLDR94.MS - Rtvwd: 7/29/94
Print*!: 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
no prohibited waste
which exhibits a
characteristic under
40 CFR Part 261,
Subpart C may be
land disposed unless
waste complies with
Part 268, Subpart D
treatment standards
wastes that exhibit a
characteristic are
subject to 268.7
requirements; once
wastes are no longer
hazardous, place one-
time notification and
certification in
generator's/treater's
files and send to EPA
region or authorized
State; when
notification and
certification must be
updated; annual EPA/
State notification if
such changes occur,
by December 31
inf nrnftfifiAn nttOf^Afl
iniunuaiKJii nBaUBu
with each notification
certification signed by
authorized
representative stating
language found in
268.7(b)(5)
CHECKLIST
^CBEDmrH?
wrcncniiC
78
78,109
78
78,109
78,
83,109
78,109
78,109
.-
FEDERAL RCHA CITATION
-
268.9(c)
*
•
268.9(d)
268.9(dM1)
268.9
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
SUBPART B - SCHEDULE FOR LAND DISPOSAL PROHIBITION AND ESTABLISHMENT OF
TREATMENT STANDARDS
47 SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT EXEMPTIONS '
defines additional
circumstances in
which prohibited
waste may continue
to be placed in a
surface impoundment
continued storage of
"newly identified
waste" in newly
regulated
impoundment for 48
months after the
promulgation of the
additional listing or
characteristic
provided waste is not
otherwise prohibited
and impoundment is
in compliance with
265, subpart F within
1 2 months after new
listing/characteristic
promulgation
109
109
268.14(a)
268.14(b>
Page 81 of 135
OCIDR94J.1S
-ReviMd: 7/23/9*
Primed 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
continue treatment of
"newly identified
waste" in newly
regulated
impoundment.
provided waste is not
otherwise prohibited.
and surface
impoundment is in
compliance with 265,
Subpart F within 1 2
months after new
listing/characteristic
promulgation
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
109
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
--
268.14(c)
ANALOGOUS STATE
OTAT10N
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
SUBPART C - PROHIBITIONS ON LAND DISPOSAL
WASTE SPECIFIC PROHIBITIONS - SOLVENT WASTES
48 effective November
8, 1986, F001-F005
spent solvent wastes,
as specified in
261 .31 , are
prohibited from land
disposal unless one or
more conditions
apply:
generated by an SQG
of 100-1000 kg/mo
generated by a
CERCLA response
action/corrective
action except where
waste is
contaminated soil or
debris
34
34
34,50
268.30O)
268.30(a)(1)
268.30(a)(2)
i~
Page 82 of 135
DCLDR94J.1S - RaviMd: 7/29/94
Prim** 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9641.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
9 concentration-specific
exemption (solvent
waste with less than
1 % total solvent
constituent)
solvent waste residue
from treating a
268.30(a)(1),
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
49 wastes treated to
meet Subpart D of
Part 268
49 disposal at facility
with successful no-
migration petition
49 wastes and units for
which case-by-case
extensions have been
granted
CHECKLIST
•KCCBEUjMC
wravm^c
34,50
34,50
34,50
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
268.30WH1)
268.30(d)(2)
268.30(d)(3)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
WASTE SPECIFIC PROHIBITIONS - DIOXIN-CONTAINING WASTES
9 effective November
8, 1 988, the dioxin-
containing wastes,
F020-F023 and
F026-F028, are
prohibited from land
disposal unless a
specific condition
applies:
these wastes are
contaminated soil and
debris waste resulting
from response action
under CERCLA or
from a RCRA
corrective action
prohibit land disposal
of F020-F023 and
F026-F028 dioxin-
containing wastes of
268.31 (a)(1)
effective November
8, 1990
34,50
50
50
•
268.31(a)
268.31
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
9 between November
8, 1988, and
November 8, 1 990,
wastes of 268.31 (a)
(1) disposed in landfill
or surface
impoundment must
meet 268.5(h){2) and
applicable 264 and
265 requirements
9,50 situations where
268.31 (a). and (b) do
not apply
9,50 wastes treated to
meet Subpart D, Part
268 standards
8,50 disposal at facility
with successful no-
migration petition
9,50 extension to effective
date of a prohibition
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
34,50
34,50
34,50
34,50
34,50
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
268.31 (c)
268.31 (d)
268.31 (d)(1)
268.31
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
reserved
reserved
268.32(a) and (e)
requirements do not
apply until specific
calendar dates:
July8, 1989 for
contaminated soil or
debris not resulting
from a 104 or 106
CERCLA response or
a RCRA corrective
action; disposal
allowed between July
8, 1987, and July 8,
1989, in landfill or
surface impoundment
in compliance with
268.5
268.32(d)
,
268.32(d)(1)
268.32(d}(2)
268.32(e)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STON-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
P*
^
Page 86 of 135
OCLDRMJ.1S - R*viMd: 7/29/94
Print** 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
liquids containing
HOCs greater than or
equal to 1 ,000 mg/l
and not prohibited
under 268.32(a)(3)
nontiquid wastes
containing HOCs
greater than or equal
to 1 ,000 mg/kg and
not wastes described
in 268.32(d)
between July 8,
1 987, and November
8, 1988,268.32(6)
(1 ) and (e)(2) wastes
may be disposed of in
a landfill or surface
impoundment if
disposal complies
with 268.5(h)(2)
requirements of
268.32O),
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions _
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL KQUWEMENTS
requirements of
268.32(aM3), (d) and
{el do not apply when
subject to Part 268,
Subpart C prohibition
1 method 9095
required
applicability of waste
analysis/
recordkeeping
requirements of
268.7:
initial generator must
use261.22(a)(1)
procedures or
knowledge of pH; pH
less than or equal to
2.0 restriction
initial generator must
test for or have
knowledge of HOC or
PCB concentration
levels; restriction
above levels
CHECKLIST
BcecaeM^c
nCJ LJ lLJn»C
39,50
39
39
39
39
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
268.32(h)
268.32(i)
268.32(j)
268.32
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
land disposal
prohibition of K061
waste containing
15% or greater of
zinc pursuant to
268.41 treatment
standard for K061
containing less than
1 5% zinc
K071 prohibited from
land disposal
effective August 8,
1990
effective August 8,
1 990, land disposal
prohibition of wastes
specified in 268.10
having a treatment
standard in 268,
Subpart D based on
incineration and
which are
contaminated soil and
debris
between November
8, 1988, and August
8, 1990, landfill or
surface impoundment
disposal of wastes
included under 268(b)
& (c) permitted if unit
is in compliance with
268.5(h)(2)
requirements of
268(a)-(d) do not
apply if:
waste meets
applicable 268,
Subpart D standards
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
50
50,83
50
50
50
50
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
268.33(a)(1)
268.33(b)
268.33(c)
268.33(d)
268.33(e)
268.33(e)(1)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
Page 89 of 135
OCLDR94J.15 • R*v«Mi. 7/29/94
Pnn««d: 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
granted an exemption
from prohibition for
wastes and units
under 268.6
granted an extension
to an effective date
for wastes under
268.5
prohibition of landfill
or surface
impoundment
disposal of wastes
specified in 268.10
for which treatment
standards have not
been promulgated
(other than 268.32 or
RCRA 3004(d)
prohibitions) unless a
demonstration and
certification have
been submitted
for a waste listed in
268.10, initial
generator testing to
determine if 268.41
and 268.43
treatment standards
are exceeded;
prohibition from land
disposal if exceed
standards
*
rMFCKLKT
\^OEVK4>*vl
50
50
50,66
50,66
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
268.33(e)<2)
268.33(e)(3)
268.33
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
effective June 8,
1 989, prohibition
from land disposal.
except underground
injection pursuant to
148.14(f) and
148.15W), of certain
26 1.32 wastes
effective June 8,
1989, prohibition
from land disposal of
F006, F008, F009,
F011 and F012
effective July 8,
1989, F007
prohibited from land
disposal except
underground injection
pursuant to 148.14(f)
July 8, 1989, until
December 8, 1 989,
F011 andF012non-
wastewaters
prohibited from land
disposal pursuant to
268.41 and 268.43
treatment standards
for F007, F008 and
F009 non-
wastewaters;
effective December
8, 1989, F011 and
F012 prohibited from
land disposal
pursuant to 268.41
and 268.43
treatment standards
for F011 and F012
nonwastewaters
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
63
63
63
63
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
268.34U)}
268.34(c)
268.34(c)(1)
268.34(c)(2)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
Page 91 of 135
OCLDR94J.15
• H«viMd 7/29/94
Printed: 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
effective June 8,
1991, wastes
specified in 268.34
with Part 268,
Subpart D treatment
standard based on
incineration, and
which are
contaminated soil and
debris, are prohibited
from land disposal
requirements for
landfill or surface
impoundment
disposal of wastes
included in 268.34(c)
and (d) between June
8, 1989, and June 8,
1991; applies to
F007, F008, F009,
F011,and F012 only
between June 8,
1989, and JulyS,
1989
requirements of
268.34(aHd) do not
apply if:
meet applicable 268
Subpart D standards
granted an exemption
pursuant to a 268.6
petition for the
wastes and units
covered by the
petition
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
63
63
63
63
63
.-
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
268.34(d)
268.34(e)
268.34(f)
268.34(f)(1)
268.34(f)(2)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
_
A
W
Page 92 of 135
DCLORMJ.1S -RcwtoMfc 7/29/94
Print** 12/22/94
-------
1
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9S41.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
268.34(a), (b) and (c)
do not apply if
granted extension
under 268.5 for
wastes covered by
extension
between June 8,
1989, and May 8,
1990, prohibition
from land disposal in
landfills or surface
impoundments of
268.11 wastes for
which Subpart D
treatment standards
are not applicable.
including California
list wastes subject to
prohibitions under
RCRA 3004(d) or
268.32; exceptions
under 268.8
initial generator
testing to determine
if a268.10, 268.11
and 268. 1 2 waste
exceeds applicable
268.41 and 268.43
treatment standards;
land disposal
prohibited and all 268
requirements apply if
constituents exceed
Part 268, Subpart D
level
f
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
63
63
63
.•
FEDERAL RCHA CITATION
268.34(g)
268.34(h)
268.340)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
Page 93 of 135
DCLDR94J.15 - R*vMd: 7/29/94
Printed: 12122194
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STHN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADEN
IN SCOPE
WASTE SPECIFIC PROHIBITIONS - THIRD THIRD WASTES
effective August 8,
1990, prohibition
from land disposal of
certain wastes
specified in 261.31,
261.32,261.33(6)
and 261.33{f)as
listed in 268.35(a)
effective November
8, 1 990, prohibition
from land disposal of
certain wastes
specified in 261.32
effective May 8,
1992, prohibition
from land disposal of
certain wastes
specified in 261.31,
261.32,261.33(6)
and 261.33(f);
certain characteristic
wastes; and RCRA
hazardous wastes
containing naturally
occurring radioactive
materials
effective May 8,
1992,268.10,
268.11 and 268.12
mixed
radioactive/hazardous
wastes are prohibited
from land disposal
78,83
78
78,83,
106,116
78,83,
116
268.35(a)
268.35(b)
268.35
-------
1
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
53
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
subject to applicable
prohibitions in
§§ 268.30,268.31
and 268.32,
contaminated soil and
debris are prohibited
from land disposal as
follows:
effective May 8,
1 994, prohibition
from land disposal of
debris contaminated
with 268.12 wastes
and debris
contaminated with
any characteristic
waste having Subpart
D, Part 268
treatment standards
effective May 8,
1 994, mixed
radioactive hazardous
debris contaminated
with 268.12 wastes
and mixed radioactive
hazardous debris
contaminated with
any characteristic
waste for which
Subpart D treatment
standards are
established are
prohibited from land
disposal
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
:
116
78,83,
103,
116,123
123
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
.
1
268.35(e)
268.35(e){1)
268.35(e)(2)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
Page 95 of 135
DCLDR94J.15 - R*vMd: 7/29/94
Pnmwf; 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
268.35(e)(1)&(2)do
not apply where
generator has failed
to make good-faith
effort to locate
suitable treatment
capacity, has not
utilized such capacity
as it has found to be
available, or has
failed to file a report
under 268. 5(g), by
August 12, 1993 or
within 90 days after
hazardous waste is
generated, describing
generator's efforts to
locate treatment
capacity; where
268.35(e){1)&(2) do
not apply, all wastes
described in
268.35(e)(1}&(2) are
prohibited from land
disposal effective
May8, 1993
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
123
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
-
268.35(6X3)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
f
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
,
,
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
^
m
\
Wr
Page 96 of 135
DCLDR94J.1S - RmiMd: 7/29/9*
Primed: 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
effective May 8,
1 993, hazardous soil
contaminated with
wastes specified in
this section having
treatment standards
in 268 Subpart D
based on incineration,
mercury retorting or
vitrification, and soils
contaminated with
hazardous wastes
listed in 40 CFR
268.10,268.11 and
268. 12 that are
mixed radioactive
hazardous wastes are
prohibited from land
disposal
when used in
268.35(e)(1)&(2),
debris defined as:
as defined in
268. 2(g)
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
116,123
123
123
-•
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
"
268.35(e)(4)
268.35(e)(5)
268.35(e)(5)(i)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
53
Page 97 of 135
DCLDR94J J5 - Rcvmd: 7/29/94
Print*d: 12/22/34
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
nonfriable inorganic
solids that are
incapable of passing
through a 9.5 mm
standard sieve that
require cutting, or
crushing and grinding
in mechanical sizing
equipment prior to
stabilization, limited
to the inorganic or
metal materials
specified in
268.35(e)(5)(ii)(A)-(H)
between May 8,
1990, and August 8,
1 990, wastes
included in paragraph
268.35(a) may be
disposed of in a
landfill or surface
impoundment only if
such unit is in
compliance with
268.5(hH2)
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
123
78
FEDERAL RCHA CITATION
268.35(eM5Mii)
268.35{eH5)(ii)
(A)
268.35(e)(5)(ii)
(B)
268.35(e)(5)(ii)
(C)
268.35{e)(5Mii)
(D)
268.35(e)(5)(ii)(E)
268.35(e)(5Mii)(F)
268.35(eH5)(ii)
(G)
268.35(e)(5)(ii)
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9841.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
between May 8,
1 990, and November
8, 1 990, wastes
included in paragraph
268.35{b) may be
disposed of in a
landfill or surface
impoundment only if
such unit is in
compliance with
268.5(h){2)
between May 8,
1 990, and May 8,
1992, wastes
included in
paragraphs
268.35(c), (d) and (e)
may be disposed of in
a landfill or surface
impoundment only if
such unit is in
compliance with
268.5(h)(2)
conditions under
which requirements
of paragraphs
268.35(a), (b), (c),
(d) and (e) do not
apply:
wastes meet
applicable Part 268,
Subpart D standards
persons granted
exemption under
268.6
wastes meet
applicable alternate
standards under
268.44
CHECKUST
REFERENCE
78
78
78
78
78
78
„•
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
268.35(g)
268.35(h)
268.35(0
268.35(0(1)
268.35(0(2}
268.35(i}(3)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN score
•
Page 99 of 135
DCLDR94J.15 • RcviMd: 7/29/94
Pnm«d 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
persons granted
extension to the
effective date of a
prohibition under
268.5
initial generator
testing to determine
if a 268. 10, 268.11
and 268.12 waste
exceeds applicable
268.41 and 268.43
treatment standards;
land disposal
prohibited and all 268
requirements apply if
constituents exceed
Part 268, Subpart D
levels
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
78
.
78
f.
FEDERAL flCRA CITATION
268.35(i)(4)
268.35(j)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
1
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
^
*_
Page 100 of 135
DCUDR34J.15 • RwnMd: 1129194
Pnmwl: 12(22/9«
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
effective May 8,
1993, prohibition
from land disposal of
D008 lead materials
stored before
secondary smelting;
submission of binding
contractual
commitment,
documentation and
detailed schedule for
specified
construction, and
providing specified
capacity, by March 1 ,
1993; D008
prohibited from land
disposal by failure to
submit
documentation;
placed in facility
record by July 27,
1 992, documentation
demonstrating that
such management
capacity will be
adequate and
complies with all
applicable Subtitle C
requirements
CHECKLIST
REFERENCc
106
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
»
268.35(k)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
Page 101 of 135
DOOR34J.1S -R*viM
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
CHECKLIST
RCCEREMfV
ncrcnBrviwc
FEDERAL ROW, CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EOUIV.
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STHN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
WASTE SPECIFIC PROHIBITIONS - NEWLY LISTED WASTES
effective November
9, 1992, K1 07,
K108, K109, K110,
K111,K112, K117,
K118, K123, K124,
K125,K126, K131,
K132, K136, U328,
U353 and U359
prohibited from land
disposal
effective June 30,
1993, F037 and
F038 not generated
from surface
impoundment
cleanouts or closures
are prohibited from
land disposal
effective June 30,
1994, F037 and
F038 generated from
surface impoundment
cleanout or closures
are prohibited from
land disposal
effective June 30,
1994, radioactive
wastes mixed with
specified wastes are
prohibited from land
disposal
109
109
109
109
268.36O)
268.36(b)
268.36(c)
268.36(d)
•
Page 102 of 135
DCLDR94J 15 - FWvMd: 7/29/94
PrnitwJ: 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
effective June 30,
1 994, debris
contaminated with
specified wastes and
not contaminated
with other prohibited
waste are prohibited
from land disposal
under what
circumstances
268.36(b) wastes
may be disposed in a
landfill or generated
and disposed in a
surface impoundment
under what
circumstances
268.36(d) and (e)
wastes may be
disposed in a landfill
or generated and
disposed in a surface
impoundment
under what
circumstances
268.36 (a)-(e) do not
apply
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
109
109
109
109
FEDERAL RCflA CITATION
268.36(e)
268.36(f)
268.36(g)
268.36(h)
268.36(h)(1)
268.36(h)(2>
268.36(h)(3)
268.36(h)(4)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
Page 103 of 135
DCLDRS4J.15 - R*vMt 7/29/94
Primed: 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL HEOUmaCNTS
how to determine
whether a 268.36
waste exceeds a
268.41 or 268.43
treatment standard;
waste prohibited and
all Part 268
requirements apply if
constituents in
excess of applicable
levels
CHECKLIST
firmntpr
nu uw»nvVr
*
109
.
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
268.36(0
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STNN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPt
WASTE SPECIFIC PROHIBITIONS-IGNITABLE AND CORROSIVE CHARACTERISTIC WASTES
WHOSE TREATMENT STANDARDS WERE VACATED
effective August 9,
1993, wastes
specified in 261.21
as D001 (and not in
the High TOC
Ignitable Liquids
subcategory) and in
261.22 as D002 that
are managed in
systems other than
those whose
discharge is regulated
under the CWA or
that inject in Class I
deep wells regulated
under the SDWA or
are zero dischargers
that engage in CWA-
equivaient treatment
before ultimate land
disposal, are
prohibited from land
disposal; CWA-
equivalent treatment
defined
-
124
268.37(a)
k
Page 104 of 135
0CLDA94J.1S • tovi
7/29/94
Print** 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9S41.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
effective February
1 0, 1 994, wastes
specified in 261.21
as D001 (and not in
the High TOC
Ignitable Liquids
subcategory) and in
26 1.22 as D002 that
are managed in
systems defined in
40CFR 144.6(6} and
146.6(e) as Class V
injection wells that do
not engage in CWA-
equivalent treatment
before injection are
prohibited from land
disposal
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
124
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
268.37(b)
ANALOGOUS* STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
Page 105 of 135
DCLDRS4J.1S • taviMd: 7/29/94
Pnntwlr 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
CHECKLIST
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
SUBPART D - TREATMENT STANDARDS
33
APPLICABILITY OF TREATMENT STANDARDS
restricted waste
under 268.41 may be
land disposed if
extract of waste or
treatment residue.
developed using 261
Appendix II Methods,
does not exceed
268.41 Table CCWE
values; exceptions;
specific wastes may
be land disposed if
extract or treatment
residue developed as
specified does not
exceed Table CCWE
values for any
hazardous constituent
in Table CCWE for
waste
34,
t39,50,
78,83
268.40O)
-
J^
•
I
Page 106 of 135
DCLDR94J.15
7/29/94
Printed: 12722/9*
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9S41.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
restricted waste with
a 268.42 treatment
technology, or
hazardous debris with
268.45 treatment
technology, may be
land disposed if
specified technology
or an Administrator-
approved method is
used; for wastes
displaying
characteristic of
ignitability and
reactivity that are
diluted to meet
deactivation
treatment standard in
268.42{a) Tables 1 &
2, the treater must
comply with
precautionary
measures specified in
264. 1 7 (b) and
265.17{b)
except as specified in
268.43(c), restricted
waste identified in
268.43 may be land
disposed only if Table
CCW constituent
concentration values
are not exceeded
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
39,109,
124
50,78
.
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
268.40{b)
268.40{c)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CrTATTON
•
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
Page 107 of 135
DCLDR94J.1S - R»v««* 7/29/94
Print** 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
if 268.41 through
268.48 treatment
standard established
and waste is a
hazardous debris.
then waste subject to
those standards
rather than the
268.45 hazardous
debris standards
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
109
-
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
268.40(d)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EOAJIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRW-
GENT
BROADER
IN scon
TREATMENT STANDARDS EXPRESSED AS CONCENTRATIONS IN WASTE EXTRACT
treatment standards;
explanation of Table
CCWE
Constituent
Concentrations in
Waste Extract
treatment standards
for common
constituents in
combined wastes;
mixtures of high and
low zinc
nonwastewater K061
subject to treatment
standard for high zinc
K061
treatment standards
for constituents in
F001-F005 listed in
Table CCWE
34,50,
63,78,
102,109
34,
50,63,
78,83,
95,109,
124
34,95
109
268.41(a)
268.41 (a)fTable
CCWE
268.41 (b)
268.41 (c)
^B •
Page 108 of 135
DCLDR84J.1S • Awriwd: 7/29/94
Printed: 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN.
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
TREATMENT STANDARDS EXPRESSED AS SPECIFIED TECHNOLOGIES
treatment of wastes
identified in
268.42{a)(1)&(2) and
Tables 2 and 3 with
technology(ies)
specified in 268.42(a)
(1}&(2) and in Table
1 of 268.42
standard for
incineration of liquid
hazardous wastes
containing PCBs
standard for
incineration of certain
nonliquid hazardous
wastes containing
HOCs; where
standards do not
apply
mixture of
wastewater
(discharge of which is
subject to Clean
Water Act) and cfe
minimis losses of
materials that meet
the criteria of D001
ignitable liquids with
greater than 1 0%
TOC is subject to
Table 1 DEACT
treatment standard;
de minimis defined
removed
34,78
39
39,50,
78,83
63,
78,83
63,78
•
-
268.42(a) .
268.42(a)(1)
268.42(a><2>
268.42(a)(3)
268.42(a)(4)
55
Page 109 of 135
DCLOR94J.1S • R»vwd: 7/29/94
Pml«J: 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
Technology Codes
and Description of
Technology-Based
Standards
Technology-Based
Standards by RCRA
Waste Code
Technology-Based
Standards for
Specific Radioactive
Hazardous Mixed
Waste
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
78,83
78,83,
95,102,
109,124
78,83
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
268.42O)/
Table 1
268.42(a)/
Table 2
268.42(a)/
Table 3
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STHN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
Page 110 of 135
DCLDR94J.1S • R*vn«i 7/29/94
Pnnttd- 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN.
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
••••ft********************************************************************
Guidance note: 268.42(b) is NOT DELEGABLE. States should see Note 3 at the beginning of this
checklist regarding how to incorporate this section into their code.
submit application to
Administrator
demonstrating
alternate treatment
can achieve
268.42(a), »••»»*«•»«<»«••»«••>•«
Alternate Treatment Standards for Lab Packs
conditions for
eligibility of iab packs
for land disposal:
78
268.42(c)
Page 111 of 135
DCLDR94J.1S - fteviMd 7/29/94
Print** 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
compliance of lab
packs with applicable
provisions of
264.31 6 and
265.316
Part 268 Appendix IV
and Appendix V
hazardous wastes
contained in lab
packs
incineration of lab
packs in accordance
with Part 264,
Subpart O and Part
265, Subpart O
requirements
treatment standards
for incinerator
residues from lab
packs containing
D004, D005, D006,
D007, D008, D010
and D01 1
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
78
78
78
78
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
*.
268.42(0(1)
268.42(c)(2)
268.42(0(3)
268.42(0(4)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
*
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STUN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
•
Page 112 of 135
DCLDR94J.15 - fl*vMd 7/29/94
PrinMd: 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
CHECKLIST
nrfrnrinr*7
^ErcncN\*c
FEDERAL ROW, CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
57 radioactive hazardous
mixed wastes with
268.42 Table 3
treatment standards
not subject to 268.41
or 268.42 Table 2 or
268.43 treatment
standards; radioactive
hazardous mixed
wastes not subject to
Table 3 treatment
standards remain
subject to 268.41,
268.43 and Table 2
treatment standards;
hazardous debris
containing radioactive
waste subject to
268.45 treatment
standards
78,109
268.42(d)
TREATMENT STANDARDS EXPRESSED AS WASTE CONCENTRATIONS
introductory
paragraph for Table
CCW explaining table
Constituent
Concentrations in
Wastes; no land
disposal for specified
K wastes
meet lowest
constituent treatment
standard when
mixing wastes with
differing treatment
standards for a
constituent of
concern
34,50,
63,78
50,62,
63,78,
83,109,
124
50,63
268.43(3)
26 8. 43 {a I/Table
CCW
268.43(b)
*
58
59
Page 113 of 135
OCLDR94.I.1S -RmiMd: 7/29/94
PhntMlT 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
conditions for
demonstrating
compliance with
treatment standards
for organic
constituents
provided:
treatment standards
for organic
constituents
established based on
incineration in units
operated in
accordance with
Subpart O
requirements of Part
264 or Part 265 or
based on combustion
in fuel substitution
units in accordance
with applicable
technical
requirements
organic constituents
treated using
paragraph 268.43(c)
(1) methods
good-faith efforts fail
to detect the organic
constituents; when
such efforts must be
demonstrated
CHECKLIST
REFEnENCE
78,83
78,83
78,83
78,83
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
268.43(O
268.43(0(1)
268.43(0(2)
268.43(0(3)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
Page 114 of 135
DCIDR94J.1S • Rkviwd: 7/29/94
Primed: 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
FEDERAL HCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
ft************************************************************************
Guidance note: 268.44 is NOT DELEGABLE. States should see Note 3 at the beginning of this
checklist regarding how to incorporate this section into their code.
60 VARIANCE FROM A TREATMENT STANDARD
conditions for
variance; petition
Administrator; what
must be
demonstrated
procedures in
accordance with
260.20
statement signed by
petitioner or
authorized
representative
additional information
or samples may be
requested by
Administrator;
additional copies for
affected States and
region
Administrator gives
public notification in
Federal Register: final
decision in Federal
Register
268.7 waste analysis
requirements must be
followed for wastes
covered by variance
requirements during
petition review
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
268.44(a)
268.44(b)
268.44(c)
268.44(d)
268.44(e)
268.44(f)
268.44(g)
Page 115 of 135
DCLDR94J.1S • Rtvind. 7/29/94
Pnm«d 12/22/9*
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
apply to
Administrator or
delegated
representative for
site-specific variance
from a treatment
standard if specified
conditions are
appropriate; what
applicant must
demonstrate
260.20(b)(1H4)
information must be
included
Assistant
Administrator or
delegated
representative may
request additional
information
if site-specific
treatment standard
variance then
compliance with
268.7 waste analysis
requirements
during application
review process,
compliance with land
disposal restrictions
once effective date
for waste reached
CHECKUST
REFERENCE
50,66
50
50
50
50
FEDERAL ROW CITATION
t
268.44(h)
268.440)
268.44(j)
268.44(k)
268.44(1)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
•
*
Page 116 of 135
DCLDR94J 15 - R*«iMd 7/29/94
Print** 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
CHECKLIST
F^f*CncNCc
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
•*•*••••*•**«*•••*••••••**•*•********************************
* ******-******» •••••••**««**«**«**«******«******^^****** ********
TREATMENT STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS DEBRIS
treatment of
hazardous debris prior
to land disposal as
specified unless EPA
determines under
261.3(e){2) that
debris is no longer
contaminated with
hazardous waste
general; treatment for
each 268.45(b)
contaminant subject
to treatment in
accordance with
268.45, Table 1
characteristic debris;
deactivation as
specified in 268.45,
Table 1
mixtures of debris
types; standards for
each debris type
must be achieved; if
applicable,
immobilization must
be used last
mixtures of
268.45{b)
contaminant types;
268.45, Table 1
treatment for each
contaminant must be
used; if applicable,
immobilization must
be used last
109
109
109
109
109
268.45(a)
268.45(a)(1)
268.45(a)(2)
268.45{a)(3)
268.45(a)<4)
Page 117 of 135
DCLDR94J.1S - RvriMd: 7/29/94
Pnm«* 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
waste PCBs;
hazardous debris
subject to both 40
CFR 761 and 268.45
must meet more
stringent
requirements
hazardous debris
treated for each
"contaminant subject
to treatment,"
determined as
follows:
toxicity characteristic
debris; those EP
constituents for
which debris exhibits
a toxicity
characteristic
debris contaminated
with listed waste;
constituents for
which BOAT
standards are
established for
wastes under 268.41
and 268.43
cyanide reactive
debris; reactive
because of cyanide
must be treated for
cyanide
''
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
109
109
109
109
109
.
FEDERAL HC8A CITATION
268.45(a)(5)
268.45(b)
268.45(b)(1)
268.45{b)(2)
268.45(b)(3>
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRN-
GENT
SROADEH
IN SCOPE
Page 118 of 135
DCLDRB4J.1S - Rcvin* 7/29/94
Printed: 12/22/94
-------
1
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
when hazardous
debris that has been
treated is not
considered a
hazardous waste;
hazardous debris
contaminated with a
listed waste that is
treated by a Table 1
immobilization
technology must be
managed in a Subtitle
C facility
general requirements
for treatment
residues:
separate residue from
debris by simple
physical or
mechanical means;
residue is subject to
268 Subpart D
waste-specific
treatment standards
residue from nontoxic
debris, as specified,
must be deactivated;
not subject to 268
Subpart D waste-
specific treatment
standards
residue from cyanide-
reactive debris must
meet 268.43, D003
standards
CHECKUST
REFERENCE
109
109
109
109
109
109
•
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
268.45{C)
268.45(d){1)
268.45(d)(1)(i)
268.45
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541 .OO-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
ignitable
nonwastewater
residue, as specified.
must meet
technology-based
•D001 Ignitable
Liquids" standard
layers of debris
removed by spading
remain subject to
268.45 treatment
standards
alternative treatment
standards for
hazardous debris
*
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
109
109
109
FEDERAL RCftA CITATION
268.45(d)(4)
268.45(d)(5)
268.45/Table 1
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG JS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
ALTERNATIVE TREATMENT STANDARDS BASED ON HTMR
Table 1 identifies
alternative treatment
standards for F006
and K062
nonwastewaters
alternative treatment
standards as shown
at 57 ffi 37281
109
109
268.46
268.46/Table 1
9
SUBPART E - PROHIBITIONS ON STORAGE
PROHIBITIONS ON STORAGE OF RESTRICTED WASTES
9 except as provided in
268.50, storage of
wastes restricted
from land disposal is
prohibited unless
certain conditions are
met:
9 on-site storage
exemption for
generator
34,39
34,109
268.50(a)
268.50(a)(1)
-m_
Page 120 of 135
DCLDR94J.1S - B.v««d. 7/29/94
Pnnt«* 12/22/94
-------
1
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9641.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL flEaUREftCNTS
9 treatment, storage,
and disposal facility
exemption
9 container labeling
9 tank labeling
9 transporter exemption
storage up to one
year
storage longer than
one year
9 268.50(a) prohibition
does not apply if
waste is exempt from
a prohibition on the
type of land disposal
utilized for the waste
no prohibition where
treatment standards
are not specified or
are met, or
compliance with
268.32 or RCRA
3004 exists
requirements for '
storage of liquid
hazardous wastes
containing PCBs at
concentrations
greater than or equal
to 50 ppm
CHECKLIST
accmmr*e
ncrcncnuc
34,109
34
34
34
34
34
34,
50,66
34.T39
39
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
268.50(a)(2>
268.50(aK2)(i)
268.50(a)(2)(ii)
268.50|a)(3)
268.50(b)
268.50(c)
268.50(d)
268.50(e)
268.50|f)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STHN.
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
Page 121 of 135
DCLDRMJ.1S - Rwfewd: 7/29/94
Printed: 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9S41.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
CHECKUST
—pom*, — — , ^,_
ncrcncHitfC
FEDERAL ROM CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STHN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
APPENDIX I TO PART 268
TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC LEACHING PROCEDURE (TCLP)
9,33, TCLP is published in
61 Appendix II of Part
261
34,74
Appendix 1
APPENDIX II TO PART 268
TREATMENT STANDARDS (AS CONCENTRATIONS IN THE TREATMENT RESIDUAL EXTRACT)
62 F001-F005 spent
solvent waste
treatment standards
appear in 268.41 ,
268.42 and 268.43
34,109
Appendix II
APPENDIX III TO PART 268
LIST OF HALOGENATED ORGANIC COMPOUNDS REGULATED UNDER 268.32 ,
HOC definition and
list of HOCs regulated
under 268.32
39
Appendix ill
P-
APPENDIX IV TO PART 268
t,11 ORGANOMETALLIC LAB PACKS
list of hazardous
wastes that may be
placed-in
"organometallic" or
"Appendix IV lab
packs"
78,83
Appendix IV
rf
Page 122 of 135
OCLDR94J 15 • FtovMd: 7/29/94
Pnm«d; 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00*21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUtPEUffNTS
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRW.
GENT
BROADER
m SCOPE
APPENDIX V TO PART 268
t,11 ORGANIC LAB PACKS
list of hazardous
wastes that may be
placed in "organic" or
"Appendix V lab
packs"
78,83
Appendix V
APPENDIX VI TO PART 268
RECOMMENDED TECHNOLOGIES TO ACHIEVE DEACTIVATION OF CHARACTERISTICS IN
SECTION 268.42
list of technologies
which achieve the
standard of
"deactivation to
remove
characteristics of
ignitability,
corrosivity, and
reactivity"; use of
* specified technologies
not mandatory;
alternative methods
not performed in land
disposal units
78
Appendix VI
APPENDIX VII TO PART 268
EFFECTIVE DATES OF SURFACE DISPOSED WASTES REGULATED IN THE LDRs
comprehensive list of
wastes and effective
dates
78,83
Appendix VII
APPENDIX VIII TO PART 268
NATIONAL CAPACITY LDR VARIANCES FOR UIC WASTES
comprehensive list of
national capacity LDR
variances for UIC
wastes
78,83
Appendix VIM
Page 123 of 135
DCLDR94J.15 - R*MM<* 7/29/94
Print** 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL HE QUWEMENTS
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
FEDERAL ROW CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
APPENDIX IX TO PART 268
EXTRACTION PROCEDURE (EP) TOXICITY TEST METHOD AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST
(SW-846, METHOD 1310A)
33 interim method to
determine whether a
waste exhibits the
characteristic of EP
Toxicity
83
Appendix IX
PART 270 - EPA ADMINISTERED PERMIT PROGRAMS:
THE HAZARDOUS WASTE PERMIT PROGRAM
SUBPART B - PERMIT APPLICATION
CONTENTS OF PART /
add new paragraph
regarding hazardous
debris; description of
debris category(ies)
and contaminant
category(ies) to be
treated, stored or
disposed of at facility
V OF THE PERMIT APPLICATION
109
*
270.13(n)
.
-
CONTENTS OF PART B: GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
insert "and hazardous
debris" after
"hazardous waste";
insert "of this
chapter" after "part
264"
add new paragraph;
copy of notice of
approval of petition
or extension
109
34
270.14(b)(2)
270.14(bM21)
Page 124 of 135
DCLOR94J.15 -Rcvmd: 7/29/94
Pm*«d 12/22/9*
-------
1
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
SUBPART C - PERMIT CONDITIONS
ESTABLISHING PERMIT CONDITIONS
insert "through 268";
remove "267"
34
270.32(b)(1)
SUBPART D - CHANGES TO PERMIT
63 PERMIT MODIFICATIONS AT THE REQUEST OF THE PERMITTEE
replace "of restricted
wastes" with ", or in
containment
buildings"
add new paragraph
and subparagraphs;
conditions for treating
nonspecified waste
prohibited from one
or more land disposal
methods under Part
268, Subpart C or
RCRA Section 3004
treatment in
accordance with
268.4 and 268.3
and:
treatment in
accordance with
268.41 , 268.42 or
268.44; or
no standards exist
and treatment
removes prohibitions
of 268.32 or RCRA
3004
no increased or
substantially different
risks
109
34
34,t39
34,t39
t39
T39
34
270.42(e)(3)(ii)
(B)
270.42(0)
270.42(o»1)
270.42(o)(2)
270.42(o)(2)(i)
270.42(o)(2)(ii)
270.42(o)(3)
Page 125 of 135
DCLDR94J.1S - RcviMd: 7/29/94
Print** 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
Federal/State
approval; allowable
modifications
add new paragraph
and subparagraphs;
allow facilities to
change operation to
treat or store if:
major permit
modification is
requested;
demonstrates
necessity to comply •
with 268 or RCRA
3004; and
ensures compliance
pending
administrative
determination
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
34
t39
t39
t39
t39
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
270.42(o){4)
270.42(p)
270.42(p)(1)
270.42(p)(2)
270.42(p)(3)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
•
APPENDIX I TO SECTION 270.42
64 CLASSIFICATION OF PERMIT MODIFICATION
65, redesignate old
66 B(1)(b) asBdMc);
add new item
involving F039 under
"General Facility
Standards"; add a
footnote symbol to
the Class I
designation at B(1)
(b); remove second
occurrence of B(1)(b)
78,83,
124
270.42 Appendix
I, B(1)(b>
Page 126 of 135
OCLDR94J.15 • R*«Md: 112919*
Pnmcd: 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
redesignate old
B{1)(c)asB(1)(d), old
B(1)(b) becomes
B(1 )(c); add new item
involving underlying
hazardous
constituents under
"General Facility
Standards"
old BUHc) becomes
add entry 6 to
section I
add new section M
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
78,124
124
109
109
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
270.42 Appendix
270.42 Appendix
I, B(1)(d)
270.42 Appendix
1, 1(6)
270.42 Appendix
1, M
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
SUBPART G - INTERIM STATUS
CHANGES DURING INTERIM STATUS
remove "or" before
"containers" and
insert "or
containment
buildings" after
"containers"; in two
places, insert "of this
chapter" after "Part
268"
68 no reconstruction;
changes do not
include tank/container
changes to comply
with land disposal
restrictions
109
39
270.72(b)(6)
270.72(e)
,
1 See the amendment to the rule addressed by Revision Checklist 39 at 52 FR 41295
(October 27, 1987), included on Revision Checklist 39.
Page 127 of 135
DCLDR94J.15 - R»«Md: 7/29/94
Printed: 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
2 Paragraph 260.11 (a) is also affected by Revision Checklist 67 (54 FR 40260,
September 29, 1989), Revision Checklist 73 (55 £B 8948, March 9, 1990), and
Revision Checklist 126 (58 EE 46040, August, 31, 1993).
3 The original 261.3(c)(ii)(C) was introduced by Revision Checklist 95. Revision
Checklist 109 split the paragraph into two subparagraphs, (C)(/>&(2), and completely
revised the text. •
4 Paragraph 261.5(f)(2) is also affected by Revision Checklist 47 (53 FR 27162, July 19,
1988).
5 Note that the "TC Rule," Revision Checklist 74 (55 FR 11798, March 29, 1990), has
also made changes to 261.24{b).
6 Paragraph 261.33(c) is also affected by Revision Checklist 41 (52 FjJ 26012, July 10,
1987).
7 This revision fixes an error in the July 1, 1991 CFQ which makes it appear that there
are two paragraphs designated as 262.34(a)(2) (see the editorial note in the CFRK
Revision Checklist 82 originally inserted the first 262.34(aM2), 262.34
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9641.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
11 This code is part of the optional requirements for the alternate treatment standards for
lab packs under the Third-Third Scheduled Waste Rule. If adopted, all of the
requirements (i.e., 264.316(f), 265.316{f), 268.7(a)(8), 268.7{a}(9), 268.42{c),
268.42{c){1)-{4), and Appendices IV and V to Part 268) related to these alternate
treatment standards must be adopted.
12 Revision Checklist 109 [57 FR 37194 (August 18, 1992}] added these subparts to
Parts 264 and 265.
13 Note that there is an error in the Federal Register: the deadline for the written notice
should be February 18, 1993, rather than November 16, 1992 as it appears in the
Federal Register, in keeping with the effective date of these provisions, with the
preamble to the rule at 57 FR 37215 (second full paragraph in the right-hand column),
and with the similar provision under 265.1101 (b)(4)(i).
14 Note that there is a typographical error in the Federal Register; "lead" should be "led."
15 Note that the Federal Register for this rule introduces an error into the second-to-last
sentence of this subparagraph by inserting an extraneous "with" between "§§" and
"265.111."
16 Note, there is an error in the Federal Register article for this rule. The phrase "as
needed to permit" should read "as needed to prevent."
17 A new subparagraph was introduced into the code by Revision Checklist 78. The
original subparagraph 268.1(c)(3) was introduced by Revision Checklist 34, modified
by Checklist 39, then removed by Revision Checklist 50, with 268.1(c)(4) redesignated
as (c)(3). The redesignated subparagraph 268.1(c)(3) was subsequently removed by
Revision Checklist 66.
18 Subparagraph 268.1{c)(4) originated in Revision Checklist 34, was modified by
Revision Checklist 39, redesignated as 268.1(c)(3) while the original 268.1 (c)(5) was
redesignated as 268.1(c)(4) by Revision Checklist 50, and finally removed by Revision
Checklist 66.
19 Subparagraph 268.1(c)(5) originated in Revision Checklist 39 and was revised by
Revision Checklist 48. This text was redesignated as 268.1 (c)(4), and new
268.1{c)(5) text was introduced by Revision Checklist 50. This subparagraph was
finally removed by Revision Checklist 78.
20 There is a typographical error in the title of this section as printed in 58 FR 29860
(May 24, 1993; Revision Checklist 124); "scope/and" should be "scope and." States
should retain the correct title as it appears in the CFR.
~ „-- , . „- DCLDR94J.1S - RcvMd: 7/29/94
Page 129 of 135 **,.* 12/22/9*
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9641.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
21 These definitions were introduced into the code as part of 268.2(a) by Revision
Checklist 34. Revision Checklist 78 designated them as individual paragraphs 268.2(b)
and (c). The text of the old 268.2(b), introduced into the code by Revision Checklist
34, was deleted from the section by Revision Checklist 78.
22 Paragraph 268.2(c) is also affected by Revision Checklist 121 (58 FR 8658; February
16, 1993).
23 This definition was introduced into the code as part of 268.2(a) by Revision Checklist
39. Revision Checklist 78 designated it as an individual paragraph 268.2(e).
24 Subparagraphs 268.2(g)(1) through (8) were introduced into the code by Revision
Checklist 78, modified by Revision Checklist 83, and removed by Revision Checklist
109.
25 This subparagraph was originally 268.3 when it was added to the code by Revision
Checklist 34. However, it was redesignated as 268.3(a) by Revision Checklist 78.
26 Revision Checklist 109 redesignated the old 268.5(h)(2)(v) as 268.5(h)(2)(vi) and
added a new 268.5(h)(2)(v).
27 268.6(c) was originally introduced by Revision Checklist 34. Revision Checklist 50
redesignated that 268.6(c) as 268.6{d) and inserted a new 268.6(c).
28 The original 268.6{d) was introduced by Revision Checklist 34. Revision Checklist 50
redesignated that paragraph as 268.6(g). That same checklist redesignated 268.6(c)
as 268.6(d).
29 268.6(e) was introduced by Revision Checklist 34. Revision Checklist 50 redesignated
that 268.6(e) as 268.6{h) and inserted a new 268.6(e).
30 268.6(f) was introduced by Revision Checklist 34. Revision Checklist 50 redesignated
that 268.6(f) as 268.6(i) and inserted a new 268.6{f).
31 268.6(d)-(j) were originally introduced by Revision Checklist 34. Revision Checklist 50
redesignated these paragraphs as 268.6(g)-(m).
32 268.6(k) was originally introduced by Revision Checklist 39. Revision Checklist 50
redesignated it as 268.6(n).
33 Note, Revision Checklist 126 (58 FR 46040; August 31, 1993), a non-LDR checklist.
replaced the TCLP (method 1311) in Appendix II to Part 261 and the EP toxicity test
method (method 1310) in Part 268, Appendix IX with notes referencing the TCLP and
EP in "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods" as
incorporated by reference at 260.11 (a). All references to Part 261, Appendix II and
Page 130 of 135
OCUDR94J.1S - RnMd: 7129/94
PrniMd: 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
Part 268, Appendix IX were revised to reflect these changes. Revision Checklist 126
did not revise the content'nor the intended use of the TCLP or the EP toxicity methods.
34 There is a typographical error in 58 £5 29860 (May 24, 1993; Revision Checklist 124)
which revised 268.7{a)(1 )(ii) & 268.7(b)(4)(ii); "reactive cyanides" should appear in
italic type as it does in the CFR.
35 Revision Checklist 109 redesignated the old-268.7(a)(1)(iv) as 268.7(a)(1)(v) and
added a new 268.7(a)(1)(iv). Note that there is a typographical error in the Federal
Register rule for Revision Checklist 109. The instructions preceding the change to
268.7 (on page 57 EB 37270) incorrectly say that 268.7(a)(1)(v) is added; however,
the change shown is that a new 268.7(a)(1 )(iv) is added, as described in this footnote.
36 Note that the rule addressed by Revision Checklist 78 (55 FR 22520) makes it appear
as if 268.7{a)(3)(iii)-(v) were removed (see page 22687). This was an error and these
subparagraphs should remain in the code. Note that there is a typographical error in
the Federal Register article for Revision Checklist 109. The instructions preceding
268.7 (on page 57 FR 37270) incorrectly say 268.7(a)(3)(vi) is added. It is a new
268.7
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
43 This paragraph was originally 268.7(b)(8) when it was entered into the code by
Revision Checklist 50, but it was redesignated as 268.7(b)(7) by Revision Checklist 78
because the old 268.7(b)(7) and 268.7(b)(7)(i)-(iv) were removed by Revision Checklist
78. Revision Checklist 66 corrected 268.7(b)l8) before it was redesignated by
Revision Checklist 78.
44 The notice, certification and test requirements currently found in Federal code at
268.7(c)(1) and (c)(2) were originally addressed in paragraph 268.7(c), as introduced
into the code by Revision Checklist 34. 268.7(c) was subsequently modified by
Revision Checklists 39 and 50. Revision Checklist 39 added the testing requirements
now found at 268.7{c)(2), although at the time, these requirements were still part of
268.7(c). It was Revision Checklist 50 that significantly revised the paragraph so that
the notice and certification requirements now appear at (c)(1) and the testing
requirements appear at (c)(2). The checklist reference column, then, includes all
relevant checklists for 268.7(c)(1) and (c)(2) rather than just Revision Checklist 50,
'which primarily affected the formatting changes.
45 Subparagraphs 268.7(c)(3) and (c)(4), introduced into the code by Revision Checklists
50 and 66, respectively, were removed from the code by Revision Checklist 78.
46 An error in the September 6, 1989 rule (54 ffi 36967; Revision Checklist 66) makes it
appear that the revisions to 268.8(a) include the removal of 268.8(a)(4). This was not
the Agency's intent and 268.8(a)(4) remains in Federal code as introduced by Revision
Checklist 50.
47 The rest of Subpart B is not included in this checklist because it deals with the
schedule with which EPA will restrict wastes from land disposal. States do not need
to adopt those sections (i.e., 268.10*268.13).
48 The 268.30(a) introduction appeared in the final rule addressed by Revision Checklist
50, but was not changed by that rule. See Revision Checklist 50 for more information.
49 These subparagraphs were originally 268.30(c) and 268.30(c)(1)-(3) when they were
introduced into the code by Revision Checklist 34. However, Revision Checklist 50
redesignated them as 268.30(d) and 268.30(d)(1 >(3) because that checklist inserted a
new paragraph at 268.30(c).
50 These subparagraphs were originally 268.31 (b) and 268.31 (b)(1)-(3) when they were
introduced into the code by Revision Checklist 34. However, Revision Checklist 50
redesignated them, as 268.31 (d) and 268.31 (d)(1 H3) because that checklist inserted a
new paragraph at 268.31 (b).
i
51 While this subparagraph appeared in the final rule addressed by Revision Checklist 50.
this rule did not change this subparagraph. See Footnote 9, page 28 of Revision
Checklist 50.
Page 132 of 135
OOJDR94J.15 -RcvMd: 7/29/94
PrniM* 12/22/9*
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
52 This subparagraph was originally 268.35(e) when introduced into the code by Revision
Checklist 78. However, Revision Checklist 116 redesignated it as 268.35(e)(1), with
some modifications, and inserted a new paragraph at 268.35(e).
53 The original 268.35(e)(2) was introduced by Revision Checklist 116. Revision
Checklist 123 redesignated it as 268.35(e)(4) and added a new 268.35(e>(2).
54 Note that there are typographical errors in the Federal Register addressed by Revision
Checklist 102. The change from K031 to D031 appears to be incorrect; "D031"
should be "K031." There will be a technical correction in the future. Also, after
"Appendix I of this part" in column 2 of page 57 FR 8089 for 268.41 (a), "far the
allowable" appears to have been incorrectly changed to "fit the allowable."
55 268.42(a)(3) was introduced into the code by Revision Checklist 63. Revision
Checklist 78 removed this paragraph and Revision Checklist 83 added a new
268.42(aH3).
56 268.42{a)(4) was introduced into the code by Revision Checklist 63. Revision
Checklist 78 removed this paragraph.
57 The 55 EE 22520, June 1,1990, code incorrectly states that a subparagraph
268.42
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9641.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
*
treatment standards. The TC rule and its June 29, 1990 modification promulgated a
revised TCLP at 261, Appendix II, with modifications based on the Agency's own
research and public comment. This TCLP is to be used in both the TC and the LDR
programs. The objective of the above footnoted revision to 268, Appendix I, is to
assure that the TCLP entered into the code by the November 7, 1986 notice (51 FR
40572; Revision Checklist 34) is removed and replaced by the TCLP entered into the
code and amended by the final rules (55 EB 11798 and 55 FR 26986) addressed by
Revision Checklist 74. The actual placement of the TCLP within a State's code is not
that important, per se; what is important is that a State's code contains only the
Revision Checklist 74 TCLP.
62 Revision Checklist 109 removed the table of F001-F005 spent solvent waste treatment
standards and replaced it with a note regarding where such treatment standards may be found.
63 Revision Checklist 54 revised the section heading, which previously read "Minor Modification of
Permits," to read "Permit Modification at the Request of the Permittee." This was an optional
change; therefore a State may have the old section title if it elected not to adopt the Checklist
54 changes. States should also note that 270.42 was not required by 271.14 to be part of a
State's authorized permit program. Thus, only States which elected to have a section analogous
to 270.42 at the time of base program authorization need worry about the 270.42 modifications
made to this section by Revision Checklists 34, 39, 54, and 109. Revision Checklist 54
removed portions of the code added by Revision Checklists 34 and 39, i.e., 270.42(o) and
270.42(p) and their subparagraphs. However, these sections have been retained in this
Consolidated LDR Checklist because the Revision Checklist 54 deletions were optional.
various scenarios for changes to this section are as follows:
• If the State did not include an analog to 270.42 in its base program, all entries for 270.42
shown in this Consolidated LDR Checklist should be disregarded.
• If the State included an analog to 270.42 in its base program and chose to adopt the optional
changes in Revision Checklists 39 and 54, the change to 270.42(e)(3)(ii)(B) should be made; the
entries on this Consolidated LDR Checklist for 270.42(o) and (p) and their respective
subparagraphs should be disregarded (such code will have been deleted); and the new section
title should be used.
• If the State included an analog to 270.42 in its base program, but chose not to adopt the
optional changes in Revision Checklists 39 and 54, the change to 270.42(e)(3)(iiMB) should be
made; the State should have analogs to 270.42(o) and (p) and their respective subparagraphs as
shown on this Consolidated LDR Checklist; and the old section title may be retained.
64 Appendix I was introduced by Revision Checklist 54 as an optional modification to Section
270.42. Changes to this appendix addressed by Revision Checklists 78, 83, 109 and 124 are
relevant only if a State has modified its code to include Appendix I as per Revision Checklist 54.
65 Revision Checklist 78 redesignated the old item B(1)(b) as item B(1)(c) and added a new BUKb).
Page 134 of 135
DCUJR94J.1S
7/29/94
12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9841,00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Land Disposal Restrictions
as of June 30, 1 994 (cont'd)
66 Revision Checklist 83 added the footnote symbol to the Class I designation at BdXb). Note that
both the 1991 and 1992 CFRs have two occurrences of item B(1)(b). The first occurrence (as
revised by Revision Checklist 83) is the correct, version. The second occurrence of item 8(1 Mb)
is the one added by Revision Checklist 78 (without the Revision Checklist 83 change) and which
is removed by Revision Checklist 1 24.
67 Revision Checklist 124 redesignated the old item B(1)(c) as item B(1)(d) and added a new
68 Revision Checklist 61 revised and redesignated 270.72(e) as 270.72(b). The Revision Checklist
61 changes are optional, however; therefore, some States may have retained 270.72(e) in their
code as introduced by the LDR Revision Checklist 39.
DODR94J.1S • RIMM* 7/29/94
Page 135 of 135 Mm** 12/22/94
-------
-------
I
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
Consolidated Checklist for the
Burning of Hazardous Waste in Boilers and Industrial Furnaces
as of June 30, 1994
The following consolidated checklist
should replace the existing version in
SAM Appendix K
-------
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST
for the
Burning of Hazardous Waste in Boilers and Industrial Furnaces
as of June 30, 1994
Notes 1) This checklist consolidates changes to the Federal code addressed by the following
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces (BIF) checklists that have occurred through June 30, 1994:
Revision Checklist 85 [56 £R 7134 (February 21, 1991)];
Revision Checklist 94 [56 Efi 32688 (July 17, 1991)];
Revision Checklist 96 [56 £B 42504 (August 27, 1991)1;
Revision Checklist 98 [56 EE 43874 (September 5, 1991)];
Revision Checklist 105 [57 Ffi 27880 (June 22, 1992)];
Revision Checklist 110 [57 £R 37284 (August 18, 1992)1;
Revision Checklist 111 [57 FR 38558 (August 25, 1992)];
Revision Checklist 114 [57 £B 44999 (September 30, 1992)1;
Revision Checklist 125 [58 FR 38816 (July 20, 1993)1 and
Revision Checklist 127 [58 £B 59598 (November 9, 1993)).
Note that Revision Checklists 105 and 110, which address Coke By-Products, are included in this
consolidated checklist because they also affect the BIF rule.
2) Note that the regulations addressed by this checklist typically do not make a distinction
between the various types of burning devices. However, the provisions in the regulations as they
apply to sludge dryers, carbon regeneration units, infrared incinerators, and plasma arc
incinerators are considered to be non-HSWA requirements, while the regulations as they apply to
all other types of burning devices are HSWA provisions. EPA will implement the HSWA
requirements in authorized States until the States modify their programs and such modifications
are approved by EPA. The non-HSWA requirements are applicable only in those States which are
unauthorized. In authorized States, the non-HSWA requirements will not be applicable until the
States revise their programs to adopt equivalent requirements under State law.
3) Revision Checklist 98 addresses an administrative stay of the permitting standards for BIFs
adopted pursuant to the February 21, 1991 (56 £5.7134; Revision Checklist 85) final rule as it
applies to coke ovens burning certain hazardous wastes from the coke by-products recovery
process. This administrative stay has been removed by Revision Checklist 105 (57 FR 27880;
June 22,1992) and, therefore, should not be adopted by States.
4) The final rule addressed by Revision Checklist 125 was promulgated pursuant to the Clean Air
Act, rather than the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, and primarily amends regulations
in 40 CFR Parts 51 and 52. However, this rule also makes conforming changes to 40 CFR Parts
260 and 266 to ensure that the guidelines for air quality modeling and screening for boilers and
industrial furnaces burning hazardous waste are consistent with the guidelines in 40 CFR Part 51.
Only the changes to 40 CFR Parts 260 and 266 are included in Revision Checklist 125 and in this
consolidated checklist. These revisions are necessary. Therefore, Revision Checklist 125 has
been developed to help States maintain consistency with the Federal regulations. Note that
States do not have to adopt the changes to 40 CFR Parts 51 and 52 to make the Part 260 and
266 changes. Rather, States should reference Appendix W, Part 51 at 266.104(e)(3) and
266.106(h).
_ _ ....... OC8IF»4J.1S - IteviM* 09/29/94
Page 1 of 121 **«.* 12/2104
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541 ,00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
Note that EPA's Office of Solid Waste is treating the changes made by the Air rule to 40 CFR
Parts 260 and 266 as HSWA provisions because they amend the BIF regulations promulgated
under HSWA.
5) Although Revision Checklist 1 27 is designated as optional, EPA strongly recommends that
States adopt the less stringent requirements of this administrative stay because the nonmetal
limits affected by the stay are extremely conservative and were based on unintended mistaken
assumptions. This rule replaces the current nonmetal limits needed to qualify for the Bevill
exemption, as specified in the February 21, 1991 rule (Revision Checklist 85), with the land
disposal restriction (LDR) limits for underlying constituents in nonwastewaters pending further
administrative action to establish appropriate health-based levels.
that the administrative stay is conditioned on compliance with the interim LDR exemption
values. Noncompliance with those values would mean that the owner or operator of the Bevill
device is no longer meeting the conditions of the administrative stay and, therefore, must comply
with the comparison test in § 266.1 12(b)(1), in order to qualify for the exclusion in § 266.11 2.
If the owner or operator meets neither the conditions of the stay nor the comparison test, then
the residue would be subject to regulation as hazardous waste. Additionally, the stay does not
affect the application of the procedural requirements in 266.1 1 2(b}(2) except as outlined in 58 £B
59600, column 3, sections V. A-D.
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
FEDERAL RCflA CITATION
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS: __ ^
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE |H|
STfUN- |HKDER
GENT j IN SCOPE
PART 260 - HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM; GENERAL
SUBPART B - DEFINITIONS
DEFINITIONS
change "Parts 260
through 265 and 268" to
"Parts 260 through 266
and 268"
"carbon regeneration
unit"
revise "incinerator"
replace "controlled flame
devices" with "thermal
treatment" in introductory
text of the definition for
"industrial furnace"
85
85
85
85
260.10(intro)
260.10
260.1 0(1 )&(2)
260.10
»
Page 2 of 121
OC8IF94J.1S - FteviMd: 09/29/9*
PMritMfc 12/21/9*
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
redesignate paragraph
(12) in the definition for
"industrial furnace" as
paragraph (13); add new
paragraph (1 2) that adds
halogen acid furnaces to
the list of devices
considered industrial
furnaces
"infrared incinerator"
"plasma arc incinerator"
"sludge dryer"
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
85
85,111
85,111
85
.
FEDERAL RCftA CITATION
260.1 0(1 2)&
(13)
260.10
260.10
260.10
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STHN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
REFERENCES
add to first of set listings
in alphabetical order a
reference to the October
1992 version of "U.S.
EPA, Screening
Procedures for Estimating
the Air Quality Impact of
Stationary Sources"
85,125
260. 11 (a)
SUBPART C - RULEMAKING PETITIONS
GENERAL
replace "265" with "266"
in the first sentence
111
260.20O)
Page 3 of 121
OCBIF94J.15 - tovmd: 09/29/94
Print** 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
1
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
r-
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STNN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
PART 261 - IDENTIFICATION AND LISTING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
•' SUBPART A - GENERAL
DEFINITION OF SOLID WASTE
1 redesignate (d)(2) as
(d)(3); add new paragraph
regarding secondary
materials fed to a
halogen acid furnace
that exhibit a
characteristic or are
a listed waste;
exception for bromi-
nated material that
meets certain criteria
material must contain a
bromine concentration of
at least 45%
material must contain less
than a total of 1 % of
toxic organic compounds
listed in Appendix VIII
material is processed
continually on-site in the
halogen acid furnace via
direct conveyance
redesignate old 261.2(d)
(2)as261.2(d)(3)
change "paragraph" to
"paragraphs"; insert "and
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
FEDERAL ROM CITATION
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MOW
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
EXCLUSIONS
t add exclusion for K060,
K087, K141,K142,
K143, K144, K145,
K147, K148 and other
wastes from coke by*
products that are
hazardous only because
they exhibit the Toxicity
Characteristic when
recycled as specified;
exclusion is conditioned
on there being no land
disposal of the wastes
from point of generation
to recycling point
insert "except as provided
by 5 266.1 12 of this
chapter for facilities that
burn or process hazardous
waste" at end of
paragraph
revise first sentence to
include phosphate rock
and overburden from the
mining of uranium ore in
the existing parenthetical
phrase; insert "except as
provided by §266. 11 2 of
this chapter for facilities
that burn or process
hazardous waste" at end
of first sentence
add "except as provided
by 1266.1 12 of this
chapter for facilities that
burn or process hazardous
waste" to end of
paragraph
85,
105,110
85
85
85
261.4(a)(10)
261.4{b)(4)
261.4(b)(7)
261.4(b}(8)
.
• f
Page 5 of 121
DCHF94J.15
R»vMd: 09/29/94
Printed: 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541 .OO-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
s
CHECKUST
ncrtritWCt
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
REQUIREMENTS FOR RECYCLABLE MATERIALS
replace the letter "G"
with 'H"
replace "Subpart D" with
•Subpart H"
remove existing paragraph
261.6(a)(3)(vii) and
redesignate 261.6(a)(3)
(viii)as261.6(aH3)(vii)
redesignate 261 .6(a)(3)
(ix) as 261.6(a) (3) (viii)
94
94
85
85
261.6(a)(2)
261.6(a)(2)(ii)
261.6(a)(3)(vii)
261.6(aH3)(viii)
SUBPART D - LISTS OF HAZARDOUS WASTES
HAZARDOUS WASTES FROM SPECIFIC SOURCES
add K141-K145, K147
and K1 48 in alphanumeric
order to the subgroup
"Coking" as specified at
57 FJ1 37305
110
261.32
•
APPENDIX VII TO PART 261
BASIS FOR LISTING HAZARDOUS WASTE
add K141-K145, K147
and K148 in alphanumeric
order as specified at 57
£B 37305
110
261, Appendix
VII
PART 264 - STANDARDS FOR OWNERS AND OPERATORS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
TREATMENT, STORAGE, AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES
SUBPART A - GENERAL
PURPOSE, SCOPE, AND APPLICABILITY
change "subparts C, D, F,
or G* to "subparts C, F,
G, or H"
111
264. Kg) (2)
Page 6 of 121
DCHF94J.1S
(HI/29/94
12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
FEDERAL RCHA CITATION
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
SUBPART G - CLOSURE AND POST-CLOSURE
CLOSURE OF PLAN; AMENDMENT OF PLAN
add sentence regarding
written notification of
Regional Administrator at
least 45 days prior to
partial or final closure of a
boiler or industrial furnace
85
264.112
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9841.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
add sentence regarding
submittat of closure plan
at least 45 days prior to
beginning partial or final
closure of a boiler or
industrial furnace; add
sentence regarding
written notification at
least 45 days prior to
beginning partial or final
closure of a boiler or
industrial furnace when
the owner or operator has
an approved closure plan
date when owner or
operator "expects to
begin closure" must be
either:
compliance dates for
hazardous waste units
receiving final or most
recent volume of -
hazardous wastes;
extension by Regional
Administrator, or
compliance dates for
hazardous waste units
meeting 265.113{d)
requirements receiving
final volume or most
recent volume
nonhazardous wastes;
extension by Regional
Administrator
;
CHECKLIST
1 1 IU ».|tj-
NtrcfWlvc
85
85,96
85,96
85,96
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
265.112(d)(1)
265.112{d)(2)
265.11 2(d)(2)(i)
265.112(d)(2)
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA1S
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
CHECKLIST
REFiEnENCE
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
CLOSURE: TIME ALLOWED FOR CLOSURE
3 within 90 days after
receiving final volume of
hazardous or non-
hazardous wastes if
owner/operator complies
with 265. 113(d)&(e)
requirements or 90 days
after approval of closure
plan, whichever is later;
criteria for extension by
Regional Administrator
3 complete partial and final
closure within 1 80 days
after receiving final
volume of hazardous or
non-hazardous waste if
owner/operator complies
with 265.113{d)&(e)
requirements or 1 80 days
after approval of closure
plan, whichever is later;
extension by Regional
Administrator
85,96
85,96
265.113{a)
265.113(b)
SUBPART O - INCINERATORS
APPLICABILITY
regulations apply to
owners and operators of
hazardous waste
incinerators (as defined in
260.10) except as 264.1
provides otherwise
85
265.340(a)
Page 9 of 121
DCBIF94J.1S . R.V
09/29/94
Flint** 12/21/9*
-------
O8WER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
fCDEHAL HEOUWEMENT8
CHECKLIST
*•*! • ••TillT
nCI MB-JVvC
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STHN-
6ENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
SUBPART P - THERMAL TREATMENT
OTHER THERMAL TREATMENT
delete "." at the end and
insert ", and Subpart H of
Part 266, if the unit is a
boiler or an industrial
furnace as defined in
S260.10."
94
265.370
PART 266 - STANDARDS FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF SPECIFIC HAZARDOUS WASTES
AND SPECIFIC TYPES OF HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITIES -
SUBPART D - HAZARDOUS WASTE BURNED FOR ENERGY RECOVERY
remove and reserve
Subpait D
85
266.30-266.35
SUBPART E - USED OIL BURNED FOR ENERGY RECOVERY
APPLICABILITY
5 replace "Subpart D of Part
266' with "Subpart H of
Part 266'
5 replace "Subpart D" with
"Subpart H"
94,96
94,96
266.40(c)
266.40(d)
SUBPART H - HAZARDOUS WASTE BURNED IN BOILERS AND INDUSTRIAL FURNACES
APPLICABILITY
6 regulations apply to
hazardous waste burned
or processed in a boiler or
industrial furnace,
irrespective of purpose,
except as
266.100
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
hazardous wastes and
facilities not subject to
regulation under Subpart
H:
used oil burned for energy
recovery that is hazardous
solely because it exhibits
a characteristic; regulated
under 266, Subpart E
gas recovered from
landfills and burned for
energy recovery
exempt hazardous wastes
under 261 .4 and 261 .6(a)
(SHvMviii); CESQG
hazardous wastes under
261.5
coke ovens burning only
K087
owners and operators of
smelting, melting and
refining furnaces
processing hazardous
waste solely for metal
recovery conditionally
exempt, except for
266.101 and 266.1 12
requirements for
exemption from 266.102
through 266.111 for
owner or operator of
metal recovery furnace;
owner or operator of a
lead or a nickel-chromium
recovery furnace, or
certain metal recovery
furnaces subject to
266.100{c)(3)
requirements
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
85
85
85,94
85,94
85
85
85,96
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
266.100(b)
266.100(b)(1)
266.100(b)(2)
266.100(b){3)
266.100
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9641.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL HEQUBCMPfTS
one-time written notice
indicating:
owner or operator claims
266.100{c) exemption
metal recovery as per
266.100(c)(2) provisions
recoverable levels of
metals
compliance with
266.100(c) sampling and
analysis and
recordkeeping
requirements
sample and analyze
hazardous waste and
other feedstocks as
necessary using specified
procedures or alternative
methods that meet or
exceed SW-846 method
performance capabilities;
situation where "best
available method" is used
maintain specified records
at facility for at least
three years
criteria under which a
hazardous waste is not
processed solely for metal
recovery
t
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
85
85
85
85
85
85,96
85
85
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
266.100(c)U)(i)
266.100(c)(1)(i)
(A)
266.100(0(1 )(i)
(B)
266.100(0(1 Hi)
(C)
266.100(0(1)0)
(D)
266.100(c)(1)(ii)
266.100(0(1)
(iii)
266.100(0(2)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
•
Page 12 of 121
DCBIF94J.1S
R»viMd: OS/29/94
Printed: 12/21/04
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
total concentration of
261, Appendix VIII
organic compounds
exceeds 500 ppm by
weight and are considered
burned for destruction;
reduction of organic
compound concentration
to the 500 ppm limit by
bona fide treatment;
blending for dilution to
meet the 500 ppm limit is
prohibited; retention of
documentation in records
required by 266.100(c){1)
(iii)
heating value of 5,000
Btu/lb or more and
considered burned as fuel;
reduction of the heating
value to below 5,000
Btu/lb by bona fide
treatment; blending for
dilution to meet the 5,000
Btu/lb limit is prohibited;
retention of
documentation in records
required by 266.1 OO(c)d)
(Hi)
requirements for
exemption from 266.102
through 266.111 for
owner or operator of
certain metal recovery
furnaces; written notice
to director; 266.100(c)(1)
compliance
CHECKUST
p^mMT>if*f
ncmntfC
85,96
85,96
96
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
266.100(O(2)(i)
266.100(c)(2)(ii)
266.100(c)(3)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
Page 13 of 121
DC8IFS4J.15 - ftaviwd: 09/29/94
Print** 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
exemption from
266.100(c)(1)
requirements for
hazardous wastes listed in1
Appendices XI and XII,
Part 266, and baghouse
bags used to capture
metallic dusts emitted by
steel manufacturing,
provided:
waste contains
recoverable levels of
specified metals
waste does not exhibit
the Toxicity Characteristic
of 261 .24 for an organic
constituent
waste is not a hazardous
waste listed in Part 261
Subpart D because it is
listed for an organic
constituent as identified
in Appendix VII of Part
261
certification by owner or
operator under
266.100(c)<3) regarding
hazardous waste;
sampling and analysis or
other information to
assure compliance;
sampling and analysis
conducted according to
maintain records to
document compliance
with (c)(3) for at least
three years
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
-
96
96
96
96
96
..
FEDBUL RCRA CITATION
266.100(c)(3)(i)
266.100(c)(3)(i>
(A)
266.100(c)(3)(i)
(B)
266.100(c)(3)(i)
(0
266.100(c)(3)(i)
(D)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
^_
Page 14 of 121
DCBIF94J 15 - R»v«*d 09/29/94
12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9641.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
basis for case-by-case
decisions regarding toxic
organic constituents;
metal recovery furnace
subject to Subpart H
requirements after
adequate notice and
opportunity for comment;
factors Director will
consider:
concentration and toxicity
of organic constituents in
the material
level of destruction of
toxic constituents
provided by the furnace
acceptable ambient levels
established in Appendices
IV or V, Part 266,
exceeded for any toxic
organic compound that
may be emitted based on
certain conditions
266.111 direct transfer
operation standards apply
only to facilities subject
to 266. 102 or 266.103
standards
266.112 residue
management standards
apply to any boiler or
industrial furnace burning
hazardous waste
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
96
96
96
96
85
85
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
266.100(cM3Mii)
266.100(cH3Hii)
(A)
266.100(c) (3) (ii)
(B)
266.100(c)(3)(ii)
(C)
266.100{d)
266.100(e)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
i
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
•
Page 15 of 121
DCBIF94J.15
R*vmd: 09/29/9*
Phntwl: 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541 .OO-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
conditional exemption
from Subpart H
requirements for owners
or operators of certain
smelting, melting, and
refining furnaces, except
for 266. 11 2; to be
exempt from 266.101
through 266.1 1 1 , an
owner or operator must:
provide a one-time written
notice indicating:
owner or operator claims
266.100(f) exemption
hazardous waste is
burned for legitimate
recovery of precious
metal
compliance with
266.100(f) sampling and
analysis and
recordkeeping
requirements
sample and analyze
hazardous waste as
necessary using specified
procedures
maintain specified records
at facility for at least
three years
i
CHECKLIST
96,111
96
96
96
96
96
96
FBJERAl RCRA CITATION
266.1 00 W
266.100(f)(1>
266.100(f)(1)(i)
266.100(f)(1){ii)
266.100(f){1)
(iit)
266.100(f)(2)
266.100{f)(3)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRW-
GENT
BROADER
W SCOPE
L
MANAGEMENT PRIOR TO BURNING
generators of hazardous
waste that is burned in a
boiler or industrial furnace
subject to Part 262
85
266.101(a)
Page 16 of 121
DC8IF94J.15 • ftovimi- 09/29/9*
PnnMd: 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
transporters of hazardous
waste that is burned in a
boiler or industrial furnace
subject to Part 263
owners and operators of
facilities that store
hazardous waste burned
in a boiler or industrial
furnace subject to the
applicable provisions of
parts 264, 265, and 270,
except as provided by
266.1 01 (O(2>; standards
applicable to storage by
burners and intermediary
facilities
generators of hazardous
waste who burn on-site in
boilers or industrial
furnaces exempt from
regulation under 266.108
small quantity burner
provisions are exempt
from the regulations of
parts 264, 265, and 270
applicable to storage units
for those storage units
that store mixtures of
hazardous waste and the
primary fuel in tanks that
feed mixture directly to
burner; hazardous waste
storage prior to mixing
subject to 266.101(0(1)
regulation
t
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
85
85,1,11
85,111
FEDERAL HCAA CITATION
-
266.10Kb)
•
266.101 (c)(1)
266.101(0(2)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS.
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
*
Page 17 of 121
DC8IF94J.15
R»vfe*d: 09/29/94
Primed: 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
PERMIT STANDARDS FOR BURNERS
owners and operators not
operating under interim
status and not exempt
under 266.108 small
quantity burner exemption
are subject to 266.102,
270.22 and 270.66
requirements
applicable 264 provisions
85
85
266.102(aHD
266.1 02(a)(2)
266.102(a)(2)(i)
266.102(a)(2)(ii)
266.1 02(a)(2)
(iii)
266.102(a)(2)
(iv)
266.102(a){2)
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
analysis to quantify
concentration of any 261 ,
Appendix VIII constituent
at levels detectable by
specified analytical
procedures, alternative
methods or best available
method; identification;
explanation of
constituents excluded
from analysis; analysis
provides 266 Subpart H,
270.22 and 270.66
information to prescribe
permit conditions;
analysis included in Part B
permit application or in
trial burn plan for interim
status facilities; owners/
operators of units not
operating under interim
status include 270.22 or
270. 66 (c) information in
Part B application, to
extent possible
sampling and analysis
throughout normal
operation to ensure
permit-specified physical
and chemical composition
limits are met
compliance with 266.104
through 266.107
emissions standards
burn only hazardous
wastes specified in permit
under 266.102(e)
operating conditions;
exception for approved
trial burns under 270.66
conditions
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
85,
94,96
85
85
85
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
266.102(b)(1)
266.102(b)(2)
266.1 02(c)
266.102{d)(1)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
Page 19 of 121
DC8IFMJ.1S - IteviMd: 09/29/84
12/21/84
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
new permit or permit
modification necessary to
burn hazardous waste not
specified in permit; trial
burn results or Part B
alternative data form
basis for new waste
operating requirements
266.103 interim status
boilers and industrial
furnaces permitted under
270.66{g) procedures
permit for new boiler or
industrial furnace must
establish appropriate
conditions for each
applicable 266.102
requirement in order to
comply with specified
standards:
for period beginning with
initial introduction of
hazardous waste and
ending with initiation of
trial burn; such period not
to exceed 720 hours;
operating requirements in
compliance with
266.104-266.107
emissions standards;
applicable provisions
when seeking waiver
from a trial burn;
extension for up to 720
additional hours by
Director based on good
cause demonstration
CHECKUST
REFERENCE
85
85
85
85
.
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
.
266.1 02(d)(2)
266.102(d)(3)
266.102(d)(4)
266.102(d)(4)(i)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EOUIV-
AlfNT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
u.
w
.
Page 20 of 121
DC8IF94J 15
09/29/9*
Pnra«d: 12/21194
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
during trial burn,
operating requirements
sufficient for 266.104-
266.107 emissions
compliance and in
accordance with approved
trial burn plan
immediately after trial
burn, for minimum period
needed to allow sample
analysis, data
computation, submission
and review of trial burn
results, and permit
modification, operating
requirements to ensure
266.104-266.107
emissions compliance
8 for duration of permit,
operating requirements
based on trial burn or
270.22 alternative data,
sufficient to ensure
266.104-266.107
emissions compliance
operating requirements
specified in the permit
apply at all times where
hazardous waste is in unit
CHECKLIST
REFcnENCc
85
85
85,94
85
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
266.102
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
operating conditions.
either case-by-case for
each hazardous waste to
ensure compliance with
266.104(a) DRE
performance standard or
special operating
requirements provided by
266. 104(a)(4) DRE trial
burn waiver; when no
waiver, each set of
operating requirements
will specify composition
of hazardous waste to
which they apply; permit-
specified operating limits
for each hazardous waste
include:
feed rate of hazardous
waste and other fuels as
per266.102(e)(6)
minimum and maximum
device production rate
when producing normal
product as per
266.102(e)<6)
appropriate controls of
hazardous waste firing
system
allowable variation in
boiler and industrial
furnace system design or
operating procedures
minimum combustion gas
temperature measured at
a location indicative of
combustion chamber
temperature as per
266.102(e)(6)
t
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
85
85
85
85
85
85
,*
FEDERAL ROW CTTATION
.
266.102(e)(2)(i)
266.1 02(e)(2)(i)
(A)
266.102(e)(2)(i)
(B)
266.102(e)(2)(i)
(0
266.102(e)(2)(i)
(D)
266.102(e)(2)(i)
(E)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRW-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
flt
W^
^
m
Page 22 of 121
DCBIFMJ.15 - RmiMd: 09/29/9*
Printed: 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
appropriate indicator of
combustion gas velocity
asper 266.102(e) (6),
unless 270.66
documentation
other operating
requirements to ensure
266.104(3} DRE
compliance
permit must incorporate
carbon monoxide (CO)
limit and, as appropriate,
hydrocarbon (HC) limit as
per 266.104(bMf); permit
limits specified:
when complying with
266.104(b)(1) CO
standard, permit limit is
100 ppmv
when complying with
266.104(c} alternative CO
standard, permit limit
based on trial burn,
established as specified
average, and permit limit
for HC is 20 ppmv,
except as 266. 104(f)
provides
when complying with
266.104(f) alternative HC
limit, permit limit for HC
and CO is baseline level
when hazardous waste is
not burned
no hazardous waste as
feed during start-up and
shut-down, unless device
is operating within permit
conditions; exception
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
FEDERAL HCRA CITATION
266.102(e)(2)(i)
(F)
266.102(e)(2)(i)
(G)
266. 102(e) (2) (ii)
266.1 02(e)(2)(ii)
(A)
266.102(e)(2)(ii)
(B)
266,1 02(e)(2)(ii)
(C)
266.102(e)(2)
(iii)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
m SCOPE
Page 23 of 121
OCMFS4J.15
09/29/94
PIMM* 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
except as provided in
266.102(e) (3) (ii) and (IN),
operating requirements
the permit will specify to
ensure 266.105
particulate standard
compliance:
total ash feed rate from
hazardous waste, other
fuels, and industrial
furnace feedstocks, as
per 266.102(e)(6}
maximum device
production rate when
producing normal product
as per 266.l02(eH6)
operation and
maintenance controls for
hazardous waste firing
system and air pollution
control system
allowable variation in
system design including
air pollution control
system or operating
• procedures
9 other operating
requirements to ensure
266.11Kb) particulate
standard compliance
no permit conditions to
ensure particulate
standard compliance for
266.105(b) exempt
facilities
9
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
266.1 02(e)(3)(i)
266.102(e)(3)(i)
(A)
266.1 02(e) (3>(i)
(B)
266.102(e)(3Xi)
(0
266.102(e) (3) (i)
(D)
266.1 02(6) (3)(i)
(E)
266.102(e)(3)(ii)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
•
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
ft
Page 24 of 121
DCBIFMJ.1S
Review* 09/29/94
Printed: 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9841.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
for cement kilns and light-
weight aggregate kilns,
permit conditions shall
not limit ash content of
hazardous waste or other
feed materials
operating requirements
the permit will specify to
conform with 266.106(b)
or (e) Tier 1 or adjusted
Tier 1 metals feed rate
screening limits:
total feed rate of each
metal in 'hazardous waste,
other fuels, and industrial
furnace feedstocks as per
266.102(e)<6)
total feed rate of
hazardous waste as per
266.102(e)(6)
sampling and metals
analysis program
operating requirements
the permit will specify to
conform with 266.106(c)
Tier II metals emission
rate screening limits and
266.106{d) Tier III metals
controls:
maximum emission rate
for each metal based on
average rate during trial
burn
feed rate of total and
pumpable hazardous
waste as per 266.102{e)
(6){i)
!
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
85
85
85
85
85,94
85
85
85
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
266.102(3)
(iii)
266.102(e)(4)(i)
266.102
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
feed rate of each metal in
specified feedstreams,
measured and specified
as per 266.102(e>(6)
total feed rate of chlorine
and chloride in total
feedstreams as per
266.102(e)(6)
maximum combustion gas
temperature measured at
location indicative of
combustion chamber
temperature as per
266.102(e)(6)
maximum flue gas
temperature at inlet to
particulate matter air
pollution control system
as per 266.102(6) (6)
maximum device
production rate when
producing normal product
asper266.102(e)(6)
operation and
maintenance controls of
hazardous waste firing
system and any air
pollution control system
allowable variation in
system design including
air pollution control
system or operating
procedures
CHECKLIST
nrrrnmrr
rvi utdvwc
85
85,96
85
85
85
85
85
85
FEDERAL RCHA CITATION
266.102(e)(4)(ii)
(0
266.102(e)(4)(ii)
(C)W
266.102{e)(4Hii)
(C)(2)
266.102(e)(4)(ii)
(CX3)
»
266.1 02(e)(4)(ii)
(D)
266.102(e)(4)(ii)
(E)
266.102(e)(4)(ii)
(F)
266.102(e)(4)(ii)
(G)
266.102(eH4)(ii)
(H)
266.102(e)(4)(ii)
(1)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUtV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
m score
•
•
10
Page 26 of 121
DCBIF94J.15
- fteviMd. 09/29/94
Prim** 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9S41.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
other operating
requirements to ensure
266.106(c) or
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
maximum device
production rate when
producing normal product
as per 266.102(e)<6)
operation and
maintenance controls of
hazardous waste firing
system and any air
pollution control system
allowable variation in
system design including
air pollution control
system or operating
procedures
other operating
requirements to ensure
266.106(c) or (d) metals
standards compliance
operating requirements
the permit will specify to
ensure 266.107(b){1) Tier
1 total chloride and
chlorine feed rate
screening limits
conformance:
feed rate of total chloride
and chlorine in hazardous
waste, other fuels, and
industrial furnace
feedstocks as per
266.102
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
operating requirements
the permit will specify for
266. 1 07 (b) (2) Tier Hand
266.107(0 Tier III HCI
and CI2 emission rate
screening limits
conformance:
maximum emission rate
for HCI and CI2 based on
average rate
feed rate of total
hazardous waste as per
266.102(e)(6)
total feed rate of chlorine
and chloride in total
feedstreams as per
266.102(eM6)
maximum device
production rate when
producing normal product
as per 266.102
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9641.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30,1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REOUREMENTS
measuring parameters and
establishing limits based
on trial burn data
as specified in
266.102(eH2H5), each
operating parameter shall
be measured and permit
limits on the parameter
established according to
either of following
procedures:
measured and recorded
on instantaneous basis
and permit limit based on
time-weighted average
hourly rolling average
basis as defined
permit limit based on
average over all valid test
runs of highest hourly
rolling average value per
run
feed rate limits for
carcinogenic metals and
lead established on either
an hourly rolling average
basis or on (up to) to 24-
hour rolling average basis;
requirements for 2- to
24-hour average period:
feed rate of each metal
limited to ten times the
allowable hourly rolling
average basis feed rate
/
CHECKLIST
lirrFiMtJCf
nu tn^Envc
85,94
85
85
85
85,94
85,94
85,94
85
FEDBtAl RCRA CITATION
266.1 02(e){6)
266.1 02(e)(6)(i)
266.102(e) (6) (i)
(A)
266.102(e)(6)(i)
(B)(7)
266.102(eM6)(i)
(B)(1)(i)
266.102(eK6)(i)
266.102(e)(6Hii)
(A)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
*-
t
•
Page 30 of 121
DC8IFMJ.15
09/29/9*
Pnnt«d 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NQ. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
specifications the
continuous monitor shall
meet
feed rate permit limit
based on specified
average
feed rate limits for metals.
total chloride and
chlorine, and ash
established and monitored
based on feedstream
concentration and flow
rate; flow rate
continuously monitored as
per 266.1 02(e){6Hi) and
(ii)
if no simultaneous
demonstration of
266.104-266.107
compliance during a set
of test runs, operating
conditions of additional
test runs as close as
possible to original
operating conditions
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
85
85,94
85
85
85
:
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
266.102(e)(6Hii)
(B)
266.102{e)(6)(ii)
(B)(1)
266.102
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9641.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
facility to operate under
trial burn conditions and
reach steady-state
operations before
obtaining test data to
demonstrate 266.104-
266.107 emissions
standards compliance or
establishing operating
parameter limits; specific
industrial furnaces need
not reach steady-state
conditions for flow of
metals prior to beginning
metals emissions
compliance testing
trial burn data obtained
during emissions sampling
are used to establish
operating parameter limits
in the permit when
parameter must be
established as per
266.102(e)
requirements for
controlling fugitive
emissions
automatic waste feed
cutoff required; Director
may limit number of
cutoffs per operating
period; additional
requirements include:
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
85,94
85
85
85
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
266.102(e)(6)
-------
1
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
maintenance of permit
limit for minimum
combustion chamber
temperature while
hazardous waste or
residues remain in
chamber
exhaust gases ducted to
air pollution control
system while hazardous
waste or residues remain
in chamber
continued monitoring of
parameters with limits
during cutoff and
hazardous waste feed not
restarted until parameters
comply with limits; for
parameters monitored on
instantaneous basis,
conditions for restarting
hazardous waste feed
cease burning hazardous
waste when changes in
combustion properties,
feed rates, or design or
operating conditions
deviate from permit limits
owner or operator, while
burning hazardous waste,
must monitor and record;
specified feed rates and
composition of specified
materials
CO, HC, and oxygen on a
continuous basis as
specified; monitors
installed, operated and
maintained as per 266,
Appendix IX methods
.-
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
FEDERAL HCRA CITATION
266.1 02(eH7)(ii)
(A)
266.102(e)(7)(ii)
(B)
266.102(e)(7)(ii)
(C)
266.102(e)(7)
(iii)
266.102
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDCTAL REQUIREMENTS
sampling and analysis as
requested to verify that
requirements established
in permit achieve
266.104-266.107
standards
monitors record data in
permit limit units, unless
permit allows otherwise
daily visual inspection of
boiler or industrial furnace
and associated equipment
when they contain
hazardous waste
test automatic feed cutoff
system and associated
alarms at least once every
7 days when hazardous
waste is burned unless
specified conditions are
demonstrated; operational
testing at least once
every 30 days
monitoring and inspection
data recorded and placed
in 264.73 operating
record
compliance with 266.1 1 1
if direct transfer of
hazardous waste to boiler
or industrial furnace
without use of storage
unit
all 266.102-required
information and data in
facility operating record
until closure of the facility
.»
CHECKLIST
pQpg^g^lQg
85
85
85
85
85
85
85,96
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
266.1 02(e)(8)(i)
(C)
266.102{e)(8)(ii)
266.102(e)(8)
(iii)
i
266.102(e)(8)
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
remove all hazardous
waste and hazardous
waste residues at closure
/
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
85
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
266.1 02(e)(11)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
INTERIM STATUS STANDARDS FOR BURNERS
establish minimum
national standards for
owners and operators of
existing boilers and
industrial furnaces until
permitted under
266.102(d) or closed
definition of "existing or
in existence"; facility has
commenced construction
if ail permits necessary to
begin physical
construction are obtained
and either:
continuous on-site,
physical construction
program has begun
contractual obligations
cannot be cancelled or
modified without
substantial loss and
physical construction is to
be completed within
reasonable time
if boiler or industrial
furnace at facility with
permit or interim status,
then compliance with
270.42 permit
modification or 270.72
interim status changes
85
85,94
85
85
85
266.103
266.103(a)(1)(ii)
266.103{aK1)(ii)
(A)
266.103
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
266.103 requirements
not applicable to
hazardous waste and
facilities exempt under
266. 100(b) or 266.108
F020-F023, F026 or
F027 hazardous waste
listed for dioxin and
hazardous waste derived
from these wastes may
not be burned in interim
status boiler or industrial
furnace
interim status owners and
operators subject to
specified 265 provisions:
j
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
85
85,96
85
FEDERAL ROM CITATION
266.103(a)<2)
266.103(a)(3)
266.1 03(a)(4)
266.1 03(a)(4)(i)
266.1 03 (a)(4)(ii)
266.103(a)(4)
(iii)
266.103(a)(4)
(iv)
266.103(a){4)
(v)
266.103(a)<4)
(vi)
266.103(a)<4)
(vii)
266.103(aX4)
(viii)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
•-
Page 36 of 121
DCSIF94J-15 - RmiMd: 09/29/9*
Print** 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
controls that apply to
interim status industrial
furnaces that feed
hazardous waste for a
purpose other than solely
as an ingredient at any
location other than the
hot end or where fuels
are normally fired:
fed at location where
temperatures are at least
1800°F
determination and
documentation in facility
record of adequate
oxygen
for cement kiln systems,
hazardous waste fed into
kiln
applicability of
266.104(c) or
266.103(c)(5)
hydrocarbon controls
criteria for burning
hazardous waste for a
purpose other than solely
as an ingredient:
/
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
85,96
85
85
85
85,96
85
FEDERAL ROW CITATION
266.103(a)<5)
266.103(a)(5)(i)
(A)
266.1 03 (a)(5)(i)
(B)
266.1 03(a)(5)(i)
(C)
266.103(a)(5)(i)
(D)
266.103(a)(5)(ii)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STftN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
Page 37 of 121
DC8F94J.15 - fteviHd: 09/2944
Plinttd: 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
total concentration of
261, Appendix VIII
nonmetal compounds
exceed 500 ppm by
weight as fired and
considered burned for
destruction; reduction of
the concentration of
nonmetal compounds to
the 500 ppm limit by
bona fide treatment;
blending for dilution to
meet the 500 ppm limit
prohibited; retention of
documentation in facility
record
heating value of 5,000
Btu/lb or more, as fired.
and considered burned as
fuel; reduction of the
heating value of a waste
as-generated to below
5,000 Btu/lb limit by bona
fide treatment; blending
to augment heating value
to meet the 5,000 Btu/lb
limit prohibited; retention
of documentation in
facility record
burning hazardous waste
with heating value less
than 5,000 Btu/lb
prohibited; situation
where 5,000 Btu/lb limit
can be exceeded;
exceptions:
hazardous waste burned
solely as an ingredient
. CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
85,96
85,96
85.96
96
:
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
266.1 03 (aM5)(ii)
(A)
266.103(a)(5)(ii)
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9841.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
hazardous waste burned
for purposes of
compliance testing for a
total period of time not to
exceed 720 hours
waste burned if Director
has documentation to
show that, prior to
August 21, 1991:
boiler or industrial furnace
operating under Part 265,
Subpart 0 or P
requirements
boiler or industrial furnace
met 270.70 interim status
eligibility requirements for
Part 265, Subpart O or
Subpart P
hazardous waste with a
heating value less than
5,000 Btu/lb burned prior
to August 21, 1991
such waste burned in
halogen acid furnace if
waste burned as an
excluded ingredient under
261.2(6)
(HiXB)
266.1 03(a)(6)
(iiiHC)
266.103(a)(6)
(iv)
266.103(a)(7)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
Page 39 of 121
DCBIF94J 15
RcviMd: 09/29/9*
Pruned: 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
August 21, 1991
submittal date for
266.103(b)(2)
information; establish
limits for 266.1 03(b)(3)
parameters; certificate of
precompliance; burning
limited to 266.103{b)(3)
conditions until
266.103
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
except for facilities
complying with Tier 1 or
Adjusted Tier 1 feed rate
screening limits provided
by 266.106(b) or (e) and
266.107(b)(1) or(e).
estimated uncontrolled
emissions of paniculate
matter, each 266.106
metal, hydrogen chloride
and chlorine, and
following information to
support determinations:
feed rate of specified
materials in each
feedstream
estimated partitioning
factor to combustion gas
for 266.103(b)(2)(ii)(A)
materials, basis for
estimate, and estimate of
partitioning to HCI and CI2
of total chloride and
chlorine in feed materials;
use best engineering
judgment or 266,
Appendix IX procedures
for industrial furnaces
that recycle collected
paniculate matter and
certify compliance with
266.103(c)(iiMA) metals
emissions standards,
estimated enrichment
factor for each metal,
using best engineering
judgment or specified
266, Appendix IX
procedures
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
^
85,111
85,94
85,94
n
85
.-
FEDERAL ROW CITATION
266.103(b)(2)
(ii)
266.103(b){2)
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
basis for best engineering
judgment; 270. 11 (d)
certification of
determinations included in
certification of
precomptiance
for facilities complying
with Tier 1 or Adjusted
Tier 1 feed rate screening
limits, the feed rate of
specified materials in each
feed stream
for facilities complying
with Tier II or III emission
- limits for metals or HCI or
CI2, estimated controlled
emissions rates of
particulate matter, each
266. 106 metal, HCI and
CI2, and following
information to support
determinations:
estimated air pollution
control system (ARCS)
removal efficiency for
specified materials
use best engineering
judgment or 266,
Appendix IX procedures
basis for best engineering
judgment in conformance
with 266.103(bM2)(ii)(D)
determination of
allowable emissions rates
for specified materials and
information to support
such determinations to
include:
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
85,94
85,111
85,94
85
85
85
85
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
266.103(b)<2)
(iiMD)
266.103(b)(2}
(iii)
266.103(b)(2)
(iv)
266.1 03(b)(2)
(iv)(A)
266.103(bH2)
(ivHB)
266.1 03(b)(2)
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
for all facilities:
for owners or operators
using Tier III site specific
dispersion modeling to
determine 266.106(d) or
266.1 07 (c) allowable
levels, or adjusted Tier I
feed rate screening limits
under 266.106(6) or
266.107(e):
for facilities complying
with Tier 11 or III
emissions rate controls
for metals or HCI and C12,
comparison of 266.103(b)
(2)(iv) estimated rates
with 266.103(b)(2)(v)
allowable rates
CHECKUST
REFERENCE
85
85,94
85
85
85,94
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
266.103(b)(2)
(v)(A)
266.103(b)(2)
{v)(A)W
266.103(b)(2)
(v)(A)(2)
266.1 03(b){2)
(v)(A)(3)
266.103(b)(2)
(v)(A)(4)
266.103(b)(2)
(v){A)(5)
266.103(b}(2)
(v)(A)(6)
266.103(b)(2)
(v)(AK7)
266.1 03{b)(2)
(v)(B)
266.103(b){2)
(v)(B)W
266.1 03(b)(2)
(v)(B)(2)
266.103
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
for facilities complying
with Tier 1 or adjusted
Tier 1 feed rate screening
limits for metals or total
chloride and chlorine,
comparison of actual feed
rates determined under
266.103(bH2)(iii) toTier 1
allowable feed rates
for industrial furnaces
that feed hazardous
waste for any purpose
other than solely as an
ingredient at any location
other than product
discharge end of device,
documentation of
266.103OHAMC)
compliance
for industrial furnaces
that recycle collected
paniculate matter back
into the furnace and that
will certify 26 6.1 03(c){3)
(ii)(A) metals emissions
standards compliance,
applicable particulate
matter standard and
precompliance limit on
metal concentration
establish limits on
266.103(3)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
•
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN score
*
•
Page 44 of 121
DCWF94J IS - RoviMd: O9/29/94
Prim** 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9S41.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
feed rate of total
hazardous waste and
pumpable hazardous
waste
feed rate of each metal in
specified feedstreams
total feed rate of chlorine
and chloride in total
feedstreams
total feed rate of ash in
total feedstreams, except
ash feed rate for cement
kilns and light-weight
aggregate kilns is not
limited
maximum production rate
when producing normal
product, unless complying
with the Tier 1 or Adjusted
Tier 1 feed rate screening
limits for chlorine under
266. 106(b}{ Dor (eland
for all metals under
266.106(b) or (e), and
uncontrolled paniculate
emissions do not exceed
266.105 standard
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
85
85,94
85
85,111
85
85
85
85,111
-
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
f
266.103(b)(3)(i)
266.103(b}(3)
(ii)
266.103{b)(3)
(iiXA)
266.103(b)(3)
(iiHB)
266.1 03 (b){3)
(ii)(C)
266.103(b)(3)
Oii)
266.103(b){3)
(iv)
266.103(b){3)
(v)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STHJN.
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
Page 45 of 121
DC8IF94J 16 • R*viMd 09/29/94
Print** 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO.
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
9541.00-21
SPA 15
F&ERAL REQUIREMENTS
special operating
requirements under 266,
Appendix IX for furnaces
that recycle collected
particulate matter back
into furnace and that
certify compliance with
metals emissions controls
under 266. 103(c)(3)(iiMA)
limits on 266. 103(b)(3)
parameters established
and continuously
monitoring under:
instantaneous limits
hourly rolling average
basis as defined
feed rate limits for
carcinogenic metals and
lead established on either
an hourly rolling average
basis or on (up to) 24-
hour rolling average basis;
requirements for 2- to
24-hour average period:
feed rate of each metal
limited to ten times the
allowable hourly rolling
average basis feed rate
CHECKUST
BCEEPCU^C
ncrcncrr^c
85
85
85,96
85
85,94
85
85
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
266.103(b)(4)
266.103(bM5)(i)
266.103(b)(5)(i)
(A)
266.1 03(b)(5»i)
(B)
266.103(bH5)(i)
(B)(7)
266.1 03(b)(5)(i)
(B)(2)
266.103(b)(5)
(ii)
266.103(b)(5)
(ii)(A)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRM-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
*_
12
Page 46 of 121
OCBIF94J.1S - RCVIM*
09/29/94
P*n«d: 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
specifications the
continuous monitor shall
meet:
feed rate limits for metals.
total chloride and
chlorine, and ash
established and monitored
based on feedstream
concentration and flow
rate; flow rate
continuously monitored as
per 266.1 03(b)(5 Hi) and
(ii)
on or before August 21 ,
1991, owner or operator
submits notice to major
local newspaper and
sends copy of notice to
State and local
government units; provide
evidence of notice
submittal for publication
with certification of pre-
compliance to Director;
notice must bear specified
title and include:
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
85
85,94
85
85,94
FEDERAL RCHA CITATION
266.103(b}(5)
(iiMB)
266.103{b)(5)
(u)(B}(7)
266.103(b)<5)
(ii)(B)(2)
266.103(b)(5)
(iii)
266.103(b)(6)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS.
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN.
GENT
1
BROADER
IN SCOPE
12
Page 47 of 121
DCBIF94J.15
R*vind: 09/29/84
Printed: 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
information to include in
public notice
when monitoring systems
for 266. 1 03(c)(1 Mv)-(xiii)
operating parameters are
installed and operating in
conformance with vendor
or 266, Appendix IX
specifications, continuous
monitoring required and
records maintained in
operating record
CHECKLIST
ocrriM'hir^
ncrcivpmc
85
85,96
85
85
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
266.103{b)(6)(i)
266.103(b)(6)
(ii) '
266.1 03(b)(6)
(iii)
266.1 03(b)(6)
(iv)
266.103(b)<6)
(v)
266.103(b)(6)
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
submittal of revised
certification of pre-
compiiance under
266.103(b){2)&(3>
procedures
266. 103(b)(6) public
notice requirements not
applicable to
recertifications
operation of facility within
limits established for
266.103(b)(3) parameters
until 266.103{b) revised
certification or
266. 1 03{c) certification
of compliance is
submitted
language of signed
statement that must be
included with the
certification of
precompliance
conduct emissions testing
to document compliance
with 266.104(b)-(e),
266. 105-266. 107 and
266.103(a)(5)(t)(D)
emissions standards;
submittal of certification
of compliance on or
before August 21, 1992
CHECKLIST
fCFEnENCC
85
85
85
85
85,94
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
266.103{bH8)
266.103(bK8Ki)
266.103(b}(8)
(ii)
266.103(b)(9)
266.103{c)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
•
Page 49 of 121
DCBIF94J.1S -ftovmd: 09/29/9*
Print** 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
ffOBW. REQUIREMENTS
establish limits and all
applicable emission
standards on 266.103(0
(D(i)-(xiii) parameters
based on operations
during compliance test or
as otherwise specified
and include with
certification of
compliance; device will be
operated within these
limits and applicable
emission standards of
266.104(b)-{e), 266.105,
266.106, 266. 107 and
266.103(aH5)(i)(D) when
hazardous waste is in the
unit
feed rate of total
hazardous waste and
pumpable hazardous
waste
"
feed rate of each metal in
specified feedstreams
i
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
85,94,96,
111,114
85
85
85,111
111
85
85,
111,114
s
FEDERAL flCRA CITATION
266.103(0(1)
266.1 03(c)(1)(i)
266.103
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9641.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
1 3 total feed rate of chlorine
and chloride in total feed
streams; the operating
limits for facilities that
comply with Tier I or
Adjusted Tier 1 feed rate
screening limits
1 3 total feed rate of ash in
total feedstreams, except
ash feed rate for cement
kilns and light-weight
aggregate kilns is not
limited
1 3 carbon monoxide
concentration and, where
required, hydrocarbon
concentration in stack
gas; CO and HC limits
13 maximum production rate
when producing normal
product, unless complying
with Tier 1 or Adjusted
Tier 1 feed rate screening
limits for chlorine under
266.107(b){1) or (e)and
for all metals under
266.106{b) or (e), and
uncontrolled paniculate
emissions do not exceed
266.105 standard
13 maximum combustion
chamber temperature
with temperature
measured where
specified; exception
1 3 maximum flue gas
temperature entering a
particulate matter control
device; exception
;
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
85,
111,114
85,94
85
85,
111,114
85,114
85,114
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
266.103(c)(1)
ON)
266.103(c)(1)
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
13
limits for systems using
wet scrubbers, including
wet ionizing scrubbers;
exception:
1 3 systems using venturi
scrubbers, the minimum
differential gas pressure
across the venturi;
exception
13
limits for systems using
dry scrubbers; exception:
13
limits for systems using
wet ionizing scrubbers or
electrostatic precipitators;
exception
13 systems using fabric
filters, the minimum
pressure drop; exception
at least 30 days prior to
266. 1 03(c)(3) compliance
testing, notify Director
and submit required
information:
»
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
85,94
85
85
85,94,
114
85
85,114
85,94
85
85
85
FEDERAL RCftA CITATION
266.103(0(1)
Ox)
266.103(0(1)
(ix)(A)
266.103(0(1)
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
general facility
information
specific information on
each device to be tested
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
*
85
85
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
266.103(c)(2)(i)
266.103(c)(2)(i)
(A)
266.103(c)(2)(i)
(B)
266.103(c)(2)(i)
(C)
266.103(c)(2)(i)
(D)
266.103(c){2)(ii)
266.1 03(c)(2)(ii)
(A)
266.1 03(c)(2)(ii)
(B)
266.103(c)(2)(ii)
(C)
266.103(c)(2)(ii)
(D)
266.1 03(c){2){ii)
(DHf)
266.1 03(c)(2)(ii)
(D)(2)
266.103(O(2)(ii)
(D){3)
266.103(c)(2)(ii)
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00*21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
information on testing
planned, including
complete copy of test
protocol and QA/QC plan,
and summary description
for each test that
provides specified
information
1 3 compliance testing under
266.103(b) and
266.103(c)(2) conditions;
case by case approval to
use compliance test data
from one unit in lieu of
testing a similar on-site
unit; information required
to support owner or
operator request; approval
based on 266.103(0
requirements
1 3 industrial furnaces that
recycle collected
paniculate matter from air
pollution control system
must test to determine
266.106(c) or (d) metals
standards compliance
using one of the following
procedures:
13 266, Appendix IX testing
requirements in
'Alternative Method for
Implementing Metals
Controls"
+•
CHECKLIST
ncrcHENCc
85
85,96
85
85
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
266.103(c)(2)
(iii)
•
266.103(0(2)
(iiO(A)
266.103(0(2)
(iii)(B)
266.103(c)(3)(i)
266.103(c)(3)(ii)
266.103(c)(3Mii)
(A)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
1
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
•
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
•
-
Page 54 of 121
DCHF94J.1S - n*v«*d:
09/29/94
Print** 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
stack emissions testing
for 6 hrs/day while
hazardous waste is
burned during interim
status; conditions for
testing; analysis for
metals content to assure
266.106(0 or (d)
compliance; parameters
for which operating limits
must be established under
266.103(0(3)
conduct compliance
testing and establish
limits on 266.1 03(c)(1)
parameters after kiln
system has been
conditioned and has
reached equilibrium with
metals feed and metals
emissions; conditions to
be met during
conditioning
if no simultaneous
demonstration of
266.104-266.107
compliance during a set
of test runs, operating
conditions of additional
test runs as close as
possible to original
operating conditions
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
85
85
85
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
266.103{c)(3)(ii)
(B)
266.103(c)(3)(ii)
266.103(c)(3)(ii)
266.103(c)(3)(ii)
(BH3)
266.103(cH3)(ii)
266.103(c)(3)(ii)
266.103(c)(3)(ii)
(0
266.103(0(3)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
13
13
13
Page 55 of 121
DCBIF94J.1S
09/29/94
PriHMd: 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.OO-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30,1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
1 3 facility to operate under
compliance test
conditions and reach
steady-state operations
before obtaining test data
to demonstrate 266.104-
266. 107 emissions
standards compliance or
establishing operating
parameter limits; specific
industrial furnaces need
not reach steady-state
conditions prior to
beginning metals
compliance testing
1 3 compliance test data
obtained during emissions
sampling are used to
establish operating
parameter limits in the
certification of compliance
when parameter must be
established as per
266.103(0(1)
within 90 days of
completing compliance
testing, certification to
Director of compliance
with 266.1 04(b),(O8Ue),
266.105-266.107 and
266.103(a)(5)(i)(D)
emissions standards;
certification must include:
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
85
85
85
.
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
266.103(0(3)
(iiiMB)
266.103(0(3)
(iii)(C)
i
266.103(0(4)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
_..
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
Page 56 of 121
DC81F94J-15
R*viMd 09/29/94
Phnttd: 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
general facility and testing
information
>
CHECKLIST
flEFEnENCE
85
85,94
85
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
266.1 03(c)(4)(i)
266.103(c)(4)(i)
(A)
266.103(C)(4)(i)
(B)
266.103(c)(4){i)
(C)
266.103(c)(4)(i)
(D)
266.1 03(c)(4)(i>
(E)
266.103(c)(4)(i)
IF)
266.103(c)(4)(i)
(G)
266.103(c)(4)(i)
(H)
266.103(c)(4)(i)
(I)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
Page 57 of 121
DC8IF94J.15 -RaviMd: 09/29/9*
Printad: 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
specific information on
each test
comparison of actual
emissions per test with
emissions limits
prescribed by
266.104(b),{c)&(e) and
266.105>266. 107 and
established in 266.1 03(b)
certification of
precompliance
*
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
85
85,94
85
85
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
266.1 03 (c)(4Mii)
266.103(c)(4)(ii)
(A)
266.103(cM4)(ii)
(B)
266.103(cM4)(ii)
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
determination of operating
limits based on all valid
runs for 266.1 03(c)(1)
parameters using one of
two procedures:
instantaneous limits
hourly rolling average
basis as defined
parameter operating limit
based on compliance test
data and specific average
feed rate limits for
carcinogenic metals and
lead established on either
an hourly rolling average
basis or on (up to) 24-
hour rolling average basis;
requirements for 2- to
24-hour average period:
feed rate of each metal
limited to ten times the
allowable hourly rolling
average basis feed rate
specifications the
continuous monitor shall
meet
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85,94
FEDERAL ROTA CITATION
266.103(0(4)
(iv)
266.103(0(4)
(iv)(A)
266.103(0(4)
(iv)(B)(7)
266.103(0(4)
(iv)(B)W(/)
266.103(0(4)
(iv)(B)( /)(//)
266.103(0(4)
(iv)(B)(2)
266.103(0(4)
(iv)(C)
266.103(0(4)
(iv)(C)(7)
266.103(0(4)
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
operating limit for feed
rate of each metal
established based on
compliance test data as
the specified average
feed rate limits for metals.
total chloride and
chlorine, and ash
established and monitored
based on feedstream
concentration and flow
rate; flow rate
continuously monitored as
per 266.1 03(c)(4)(iv)(A)-
(C)
language of statement to
accompany the
certification of compliance
if required to comply with
266.104(c) or 266.103(a)
(5MJHD) HC controls.
conditioned gas
monitoring system may
be used in conformance
with 266, Appendix IX
specifications, provided
certification of compliance
is submitted without
266. 103(c)(7) time
extension; owners and
operators of facilities
electing to comply with
266.104(f) alternative
hydrocarbon provision
and requesting a
266.103(c)(7)(ii)(B) time
extension
>
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
85
85
85
85,111
FEDERAL RCRfe CITATION
266.103(0(4)
(iv)(C)(3)
266.103(0(4)
(iv)(D)
266.103(0(4)
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30,1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
special operating
requirements for industrial
furnaces that recycle
collected paniculate
matter from air pollution
control system:
266, Appendix IX
operating requirements in
"Alternative Method to
Implement the Metals
Controls" if complying
with 266.103(c)(3)(iiMA)
operating requirements of
266.103(c)(3)(ii){B) if
complying with that
paragraph
requirements if fail to
submit complete
certification of compliance
for 266. 104-266. 107
emissions standards by
August 21, 1992:
stop burning hazardous
waste and begin
266.103(1) closure
CHECKLIST
REFERENCc
85
85
85
85
85,94
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
266.103(0(6)
266.103(c)(6)(i)
266.103(cM6)(ii)
266.103(c)(7)(i)
266.103(c) (7) (i)
(A)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
JN SCOPE
Page 61 of 121
DC8IF94J 15 - RcviMd: 09/29/94
Printed: 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
limit hazardous waste
burning only for purposes
of compliance testing
(and pretesting to prepare
for compliance testing) to
a total period of 720
hours beginning August
21, 1992; submit
notification to Director by
August 21 , 1 992, stating
operation under restricted
interim status and
intention to resume
hazardous waste burning;
submit complete
certification of compliance
by August 23, 1993
obtain case-by-case time
extension under
266.l03(c)(7Kii)
condition under which a
case-by-case time
extension may be
requested for any
266. 103(c) time limit
in granting extension,
Director may apply
specified conditions
if time extension
requested to enable
facility to comply with
alternative hydrocarbon
provisions of 266.104(f)
and to obtain RCRA
permit because
266. 1 04(c) HC limit
cannot be met:
what Director shall
consider:
/
CHECKLIST
•MpnpBMphu>Me|
ncrcncff^c
85,94
85
85
85
85,111
85
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
266.103(0(7)0)
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
determine if complete Part
B permit application that
includes 270.22(b)
information has been
submitted
consider if good faith
effort to certify
compliance with all other
emission controls has
been made
if extension granted,
require facility to operate
under 266.1 04(f)(1)
baseline CO and HC flue
gas concentration limits
submit at any time a
revised certification of
compliance under specific
procedures:
prior to submittal, may
not burn hazardous waste
for more than 720 hours
under operating
conditions that exceed
those in current
certification of
compliance; such burning
conducted only to
determine if 266. 1 04-
266.107 emissions
standards can be met
under revised conditions
at least 30 days prior to
first burning under revised
conditions, notify Director
and submit specific
information:
CHECKLIST
RErKnEMCE
85
85,94
85,94
85
85
85
FEDERAL RCHA CITATION
266.103(c)(7)(ii)
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
EPA facility ID number,
facility name, contact
person, telephone number
and address
operating conditions
owner/operator is seeking
to revise and description
of changes that prompted
need to revise
determination that under
revised operating
conditions, 266.104-
266.107 standards
unlikely to be exceeded;
266.103(bH2) information
for documentation
complete emissions
testing protocol for
pretesting and new
compliance test, including
schedule for 266. 104-
266.107 emission
standards compliance;
30-day prior written
notice if revision in
compliance test date
conduct compliance test
under revised operating
conditions and submitted
protocol to determine
266.104-266.107
emissions standards
compliance
submit revised
certification of compliance
under 266.103(0(4)
i
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
85
85
85
85
85
85
FEDERAL HCRA CITATION
266.103(cM8)(ii)
(A)
266.103(c)(8)(ii)
(B)
266.103(c)(8)(ii)
(C)
266.103(c) (8 Hii)
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9641.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUWEMENTS
recertification of
compliance within three
years; if recertification
under new operating
conditions, 266.103(c)(8)
compliance
if noncompliance with
interim status compliance
schedule, burning is to
terminate on date
deadline is missed,
closure to begin under
266.103(1), and no
resumption of burning
except under 270.66
operating permit; criteria
for compliance with
266.103(1), 266. 11 2(d)
(2) and 266.1 13
provisions
no hazardous waste as
feed during start-up and
shut-down unless device
is operating within
certification conditions
during 266.103(c)(3)
compliance test and upon
certification of
compliance, automatic
waste feed cutoff
required; additional
requirements include:
maintenance of minimum
combustion chamber
temperature while
hazardous waste or
residues remain in
chamber to minimize
emissions of organic
compounds
:
CHECKLIST
HE^cHENCE
85
85,96
85
85
85,94
FEDERAL ROW CITATION
266.103(d)
266.103(8)
266.103(f)
266.103(g)
266.1 03(g)(1)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
-
Page 65 of 121
DC8W4J.15 - RiviM* 09/29/94
12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
if compliance with
combustion chamber
temperature limit is based
on hourly rolling average,
minimum temperature
during compliance test is
averaged over atl runs of
the lowest hourly rolling
average for each run
if compliance with
combustion chamber
temperature limit is based
on instantaneous
temperature
measurement, minimum
temperature during
compliance test is time-
weighted average during
all test runs
continued monitoring of
operating parameters with
limits during cutoff; no
restart of hazardous
waste feed until
parameters comply with
limits established in
compliance certification
requirements for
controlling fugitive
emissions
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
85
85
85
85
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
266.103(g)(1)(i)
266.103(g)(1)
(ii)
266.103{g)<2)
266.103(h)
266.103{h}(1)
266.103(h){2)
266.103(h)<3)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS .
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
Page 66 of 121
OC8IFMJ.IS
09/29/9*
12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
cease burning hazardous
waste when changes in
combustion properties,
feed rates, feed
stocks/fuels or design or
operating conditions
deviate from limits
specified in compliance
certification
owner or operator, while
burning hazardous waste,
must monitor and record:
specified feed rates and
composition of specified
materials to ensure
conformance with
certification
CO, HC and oxygen on a
continuous basis as
specified; monitors
installed, operated and
maintained as per 266,
Appendix IX methods
sampling and analysis as
requested by Director to
verify compliance with
266.104-266.107
standards
daily visual inspection of
boiler or industrial furnace
and associated equipment
when they contain
hazardous waste
CHECKJJST
REFERENCE
85
85
85
85
85
85
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
266.103(0
266.1 03{j){1)
266.103(j)(1)(i)
266.1 03 (jMIMii)
266.1 03(j)(1){iii)
266.103(j)(2)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
Page 67 of 121
: O9/29/94
Print** 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
test automatic feed cutoff
system and associated
alarms at least once every
7 days when hazardous
waste is burned unless
specified conditions are
demonstrated; operational
testing at least once
every 30 days
monitoring and inspection
data recorded and placed
in operating log
all 266.103-required
information and data kept
in facility operating record
until closure of the boiler
or industrial furnace unit
remove all hazardous
waste and hazardous
waste residues at closure
and comply with
265.111-265.115
f
CHECKLIST
m • i • M^HM»
nCfWlVUC
85
85
85,96
85
FEDERAL ROM CITATION
266.103(j)(3)
266.103(j)<4)
266.1 03 (k)
266.103(1)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EOWV-
AlfNT
t£SS
STMN-
GEHT
MORE
STRW-
GEWT
BROADER
W SCOPE
STANDARDS TO CONTROL ORGANIC EMISSIONS
except as 266.104(a)(3)
provides, ORE of 99.99%
required for all organic
hazardous constituents;
demonstration during trial
bum for each POHC in
permit for each waste
feed; ORE equation
85,94
266.104(a)(1)
Page 68 of 121
DCHFMJ.1S
FUviMd: 09/29/94
PrintMi: 12/21/9*
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
POHC compliance with
DRE requirements to be
demonstrated in trial burn
in conformance with
270.66 procedures;
designation of POHCs for
each waste feed by
Director based on degree
of difficulty of destruction
and on waste feed
concentrations
considering analyses
submitted with Part B;
261, Appendix VIII
compounds unless
demonstration of other
compound is suitable
indicator of DRE
requirements
DRE of 99.9999% for
F020-F023, F026 or
F027 as determined from
266.104(a)(1) equation;
notification of intent to
burn such wastes
owners and operators of
boilers operating under
266.1 10 requirements are
exempt from DRE trial
burn
owners and operators of
boilers or industrial
furnaces in compliance
with 266.109(a) are
exempt from DRE trial
bum
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
85
85,94
85
85
.
FEDERAL ROW CITATION
266.104(a)(2)
„
266.104(a)(3)
266J04OM4)
266.1 04(a)(5)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
*
Page 69 of 121
DCBIF94J.15
FWviMd: 09/29/9*
Print** 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
except as 266. 1 04(c)
provides, CO stack gas
concentration cannot
exceed 100 ppmv on an
hourly rolling average
basis, continuously
corrected to 7% oxygen,
dry gas basis
continuous monitoring of
GO and oxygen in
conformance with 266,
Appendix IX
specifications
demonstration of 100
ppmv CO compliance
during trial burn or
compliance test; highest
hourly rolling average CO
must not exceed 100
ppmv
stack gas concentration
of CO may exceed 100
ppmv if HC
concentrations do not
exceed 20 ppmv;
exception under
266.104(f)
HC limits established on
hourly rolling average
basis, reported as
propane, continuously
corrected to 7% oxygen,
dry gas basis
HC continuously
monitored under 266,
Appendix IX
specifications; CO and
oxygen continuously
monitored under
266.1 04(b)<2)
>
CHECKLIST
REFEnENGc
85
85,94
85
85
85
85,94
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
266.104(b)(1)
266.104(bM2)
266.104(b)(3)
266.104(c){1)
266.104(0(2)
266.104(c)(3)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
-
STATE ANALOG 1$:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
•
•
Page 70 of 121
DCBIF94J IS -ffevmd: OS/29/94
12/21/9*
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9841.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
,_
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
alternative CO standard
based on trial burn data
(new facility) and
compliance test (interim
status facility); definition
and implementation
industrial furnaces that
feed hazardous waste for
purpose other than solely
as an ingredient at any
location other than end
where products are
normally discharged and
fuels are normally fired
must comply with
266.104(c) or (f)
hydrocarbon limits,
irrespective of whether
266.104{b) standard is
met
site-specific risk
assessment for specific
boilers and industrial
furnaces to demonstrate
that chlorinated dibenzo-
p-dioxins and
dibenzofurans emissions
do not result in increased
lifetime cancer risk
exceeding 1 in 100,000
MEI; assessment
requirements:
determine emission rates
of certain tetraocta
congeners during trial
bum or compliance test
using 266, Appendix IX
Method 23
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
85
85
85
85,94
.-
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
266.104(c)(4)
266.104(d)
266.104(6)
266.104(e)(1)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
Page 71 of 121
DC8IF94J.1S -RwiMd: 09/29/94
PliMwl: 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
estimate 2,3,7,8-TCDD
toxicity equivalence of
specified congeners using
266, Appendix IX
procedures; formula for
estimation of equivalent
emission rate
'conduct dispersion
modeling using
recommended methods to
predict maximum annual
average off-site ground
level concentrations of
2,3,7,8-TCDD
equivalents; maximum
annual average
concentration used when
a person resides on-site;
wording should refer to
Appendix W, Part 51
rather than Appendix X,
Part 266, methods
specified 2,3,7,8-TCDD
ratio shall not exceed 1 .0
for industrial furnaces
that cannot meet the 20
ppmv HC limit because of
organic matter in raw
material. Director may
establish alternative HC
limit on case-by-case
basis; cement kilns
equipped with by-pass
duct meeting 266.104
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
demonstrate that facility
is designed and operated
to minimize HC emissions
from fuels and raw
materials and that the
facility is producing
normal products under
normal operating
conditions feeding normal
feedstocks and fuels
when baseline HC (and
CO) level is determined;
baseline HC level and CO
level defined; must be
multiple baseline levels
under certain conditions
develop approach to
monitor over time
changes in facility
operation that could
reduce baseline HC level
conduct emissions testing
during trial burn to:
determine baseline HC
(and CO) level
demonstrate that HC (and
CO) levels do not exceed
baseline level when
hazardous waste is
burned
identify types and
concentrations of 261,
Appendix Vtll organic
compounds that are
emitted; conduct
dispersion modeling; on-
site ground level
concentrations evaluated
if person resides on-site
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
85,111
85
85
85
85
85,94
85
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
266.104(f)(1)
266.104(f)(2)
266.104(f)(3)
266.104(f)(3)(i)
266.104(f)(3)(ii)
266.104(0(3)
(iii)
266.104(f)<3)
(iiiKA)
266.104(f){3)
(iiiMB)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
Page 73 of 121
DC8IF94J.1S - R*vMd: 09/29/94
Prinud: 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
demonstrate that
maximum annual average
ground level
concentrations of
266.104(f)(3)(iii)
compounds do not exceed
specified levels
monitor and report all
266.104(f) hydrocarbon
levels as 266.104(0
(1)&(2) specify
cement kilns may comply
with CO and HC limits
under 266.1 04(b)-(d) by
monitoring in the by-pass
duct provided:
fire hazardous waste only
into the kiln
1 4 by-pass duct diverts
minimum of 10% of kiln
off-gas into duct
simultaneous
demonstration of
266.104 compliance by
emissions testing or
during separate runs
under identical operating
conditions; data to
demonstrate compliance
with CO and HC limits or
to establish alternative
limits must be obtained
during DRE testing,
CDD/CDF testing and
comprehensive organic
emissions testing
\
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
85
85
85
85
85,94
85
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
266.104(f)(3)
(iv)
266.104(f)(3)
(iv)(A)
266.104(f)(3)
(iv)(B)
266.104(f)(3)
(ivHC)
266.104(f)(4)
266.104(g)
266.104(g)(1)
266.104(g)(2)
266.1 04(h)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRW4-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
•
ft-
Page 74 of 121
DCBPMJ.15
R*vMdr 09/29/94
Prinwd: 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00*21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
compliance with permit
operating requirements
regarded as compliance
with 266.104; if such
compliance is insufficient.
modification or revocation
and reissuance of permit
under 270.41
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
85
,-
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
266,104(1)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
•
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
STANDARDS TO CONTROL PARTICULATE MATTER
particulate matter
emissions limited to 180
milligrams per dry
standard cubic meter
after specified correction
using Part 60, Appendix
A, Methods 1-5 and 266,
Appendix IX procedures
owner or operator
meeting 266.109(b)
requirements for low risk
waste exemption is
exempt from particulate
matter standard
compliance with permit
operating requirements
regarded as compliance
with 266.105; if such
compliance is insufficient,
modification or revocation
and reissuance of permit
under 270.41
85
85
85
266.105(a)
266.105
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
Tier 1 feed rate screening
limits for metals specified
in 266, Appendix 1 as a
function of terrain*
adjusted effective stack
height and terrain and
land use in facility
vicinity; criteria for
ineligible facilities in
266.107(b)(7)
feed rates of antimony,
barium, lead, mercury,
thallium and silver in all
feedstreams shall not
exceed 266, Appendix I
screening limits
what feed rate screening
limits for antimony,
barium, mercury, thallium,
and silver are based on
what feed rate screening
limit for lead is based on
feed rates of arsenic,
cadmium, beryllium and
chromium in all
feedstreams shall not
exceed values derived
from 266, Appendix I
screening limits; feed rate
limit equation
*»
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
85
85
85
85
85,94
FEDERAL RCHA CITATION
266.1 06(b)
•
266.106(b)(1)
266.106(b)(1)(i)
266.1 06(b)(1 Hi)
(A)
266.106
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
what feed rate screening
limits for carcinogenic
metals are based on
equation for terrain-
adjusted effective stack
height (TESH)
stack height may not
exceed 40 CFR 51.1 00{ii)
good engineering practice
if TESH for a particular
facility is not listed in
table in appendices,
nearest lower TESH to be
used; if TESH s 4
meters, a value of 4
meters shall be used
screening limits function
of noncomplex or
complex terrain; criteria;
use U.S. Geological
Survey 7.5-minute
topographic maps
screening limits function
of urban or rural land use;
determination using 266,
Appendix IX or X
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
85
85,94
85
85
85
85
85,94
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
266.106(b)(2)
(ii)
266.1 06(b}(2)
OiHA)
266.106(b}(2)
(ii)(B>
266.106(b)(3)(i)
266.1 06(b){3)
(ii)
266.106(5)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
•
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
Page 77 of 121
DCBIF94J1S - RaviMd: 09/29/94
Printed: 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9S41.OO-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
facilities with multiple
stacks must comply with
screening limits for all
units assuming all
hazardous waste is fed
into device with worst-
case stack; worst-case
stack equation, with
lowest K value the worst-
case stack
criteria under which Tier
III standards or Adjusted
Tier I feed rate screening
limits apply instead of
Tier 1 and Tier II screening
limits
monitor feed rate of
metals in each feedstream
to ensure screening limits
are not exceeded
Tier II emission rate
screening limits function
of stack height and terrain
and land use in facility
vicinity; ineligible facilities
comply with 266.106(b)
(7) criteria
emission rates of
antimony, barium, lead,
mercury, thallium and
silver shall not exceed
266, Appendix 1 screening.
limits
t
CHECKUST
RErERENCrE
85,94
85,111
85
85
85
85
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
266.106(b)(6)
266.106(b}(7)
266.106(b)(7)(i)
266.1 06(b)(7)
(ii)
266.106(b)(7)
(iii)
266.106{b)(7)
(iv)
266.106(b)(7)
(v)
266.1 06(b)(8)
266.106(0
266.106(0(1)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
•-
^_
Page 78 of 121
OCUFMJ.15
: 09/29/94
Printed: 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
emission rates of arsenic,
cadmium, beryllium and
chromium shall not
exceed values derived
from 266, Appendix 1
screening limits; emission
rate equation
emission rate limits
implemented by limiting
individual metal feed rates
to trial burn or compliance
test levels; averaging
periods; monitoring of
metals feed rate in each
f eedstream to ensure
compliance with 266.102
or 266.103 limits
266.106(b) definitions
and limitations for
specified terms also apply
to 266.106(c) Tier II
emission rate screening
limits
facilities with multiple
stacks must comply with
emissions screening limits
for any such stacks
assuming all hazardous
waste is fed into device
with worst-case stack
worst-case stack
determined by 266.106(b)
(6) procedures
for each metal, total
emissions from those
stacks shall not exceed
worst-case stack
screening limit
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
85,94
85
85
85
85
85
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
266.106(c)(2)
266.106(c)(3)
266.106(c)(4)
266.106(c)(5)(i)
266.1 06(c)(5)(ii)
266.106
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
facilities complying with '
either Tier III or Adjusted
Tier 1 controls
conformance with Tier III
metals control
demonstrated by
emissions testing;
conformance with either
Tier III or Adjusted Tier 1
metals controls
demonstrated by air
dispersion modeling;
demonstration that
acceptable ambient levels
are not exceeded
266, Appendices IV and
V list acceptable ambient
levels; RACs listed for
noncarcinogenic metals
and 10* RSDs listed for
carcinogenic metals; BSD
defined
sum of the ratios of
predicted ambient
concentrations to risk-
specific dose for all
carcinogenic metals
emitted shall not exceed
1 .0; equation
for noncarcinogenic
metals, predicted
maximum annual average
off-site ground level
concentration shall not
exceed the RAC
/ *
CHECKLIST
MECCBCIUU*C
ncruvn^c
111
85,111
85
85.
94,1 1 1
85
FEDERAL HCRA CITATION
266.1 06(d)
266.1 06(d){1)
266.106(d)(2)
266.106(d)(3)
266.106(d)(4)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRJN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
€
«
15
Page 80 of 121
OC8IFMJ.16
09/29/94
Primwl: 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
owners/operators with
multiple stacks must
conduct emissions testing
and dispersion modeling
to demonstrate that
aggregate emissions do
not exceed acceptable
ambient levels; exception
for facilities complying
with Adjusted Tier I
controls
under Tier III, feed rates
limited to trial burn or
compliance test levels;
averaging periods same
asunder 266.1 06(b)(1)(i)-
(ii) and (b)(2)(ii); monitor
metals feed rate in each
feedstream to ensure
266.102 or 266.103
compliance
Adjusted Tier I feed rate
screening limits to
account for site-specific
dispersion modeling; how
to estimate adjusted feed
rate; feed rate screening
limits for carcinogenic
metals implemented under
266.106(b)(2)
alternative implementation
approaches approved by
Director on a case-by-
case basis for Tier II or III
metals emission limits
CHECKUST
REFERENCE
85,111
85
85,94
85
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
266.106(d)(5)
266.106(d){6)
266.106(e)
266.106(f)(1)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
•
Page 81 of 121
DC8IF94J.1S -teviMd: 09(29/9*
Printed: 12/21A*
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
determination of
266.106{d) emissions
limits for each
noncarcinogenic and
carcinogenic metal
use 266, Appendix IX
Multiple Metals Train to
conduct emissions testing
chromium emissions
assumed to be hexavalent
chromium unless owner/
operator determines
otherwise
dispersion modeling
conducted according to
specified methods to
predict maximum annual
average off-site ground
—level concentration; on-
site concentrations when
person resides on-site
compliance with 266.102
permit operating
requirements regarded as
266.106 compliance
unless evidence indicates
otherwise; modification or
revocation and re-
issuance of permit under
270.41
i
CHECKLIST
BtfCCREUf*R
nCTEflCI'l^iC-
85
85,94
85
85,94
85
85
85,125
85
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
266.106(f)(2)
266.106(f)(2)(i)
266.106(f)(2)(ii)
266.106(f)(2)(ii)
(A)
266.106(f)(2)(ii)
(B)
266.106(g}(1)
266.106(g)(2)
266.1 06 (h)
266.106(0
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
*
STANDARDS TO CONTROL HYDROGEN CHLORIDE (HCI) AND CHLORINE GAS (CI2) EMISSIONS
compliance with HCI and
C12 controls under
266.107
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
Tier I feed rate screening
limits for total chlorine
specified in 266,
Appendix II as a function
of stack height and terrain
and land use in facility
vicinity; feed rate of total
chlorine and chloride in all
feedstreams not to
exceed specified levels
Tier II emission rate
screening limits for HCI
and CI2 specified in 266,
Appendix III as a function
of terrain-adjusted
effective stack height and
terrain and land use in
facility vicinity; stack
emission rates not to
exceed specified levels
266.106{b) definitions
and limitations for
specified terms also apply
•to 266.107{b) screening
limits
facilities with multiple
stacks subject to HCI or
CI2 emissions controls
must comply with Tier I
and II screening limits
assuming all hazardous
waste is fed into device
with worst-case stack
worst-case stack
determined by 266.106(b)
(6) procedures
:
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
85
85,94
85,94
85
85
FEDERAL HCRA CITATION
266.107(b)(1)
266.107(3>
266.107(b)(4)
266.1 07 (b)(4)(i)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
Page 83 of 121
OCHFMJ.1S
R*v«*d 09/29/9*
Pnnt«d 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9S41.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
under Tier 1, total feed
rate of chlorine and
chloride to all subject
devices not to exceed
worst-case stack
screening limit
under Tier II, total HCI
and CI2 emissions from ail
subject stacks not to
exceed worst-case stack
screening limit
conformance with Tier III
controls demonstrated by
HCI and CI2 emissions
testing, air dispersion
modeling, and
demonstration that ...
acceptable ambient levels
are not exceeded
266, Appendix IV lists
RACs for HCI and CI2
facilities with multiple
stacks subject to HCI or
CI2 emissions controls
must conduct emissions
testing and dispersion
modeling to demonstrate
that aggregate emissions
do not exceed acceptable
ambient levels for HCI and
CI2
r
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
85
85
85
85
85
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
266.107(b)(4)
(ii)
266.1 07 (b)(4)
(iii)
266.107{c)(1)
266.107(c)(2)
266.1 07(c)(3)
t
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
•
Page 84 of 121
DCWF94J 15
R*viM
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 18
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
HCI and CI2 controls
implemented by limiting
feed rate of total chlorine
and chloride in all
feedstreams; feed rate
under Tier 1 limited to Tier
1 screening limits; feed
rate under Tiers II and III
limited to trial burn or
compliance test feed
rates; feed rate limits
based on:
adjusted Tier 1 feed rate
screening limits to
account for site-specific
dispersion modeling; how
to determine these
adjusted rates
emissions testing for HCI
and CI2 conducted using
266, Appendix IX
procedures
dispersion modeling
conducted according to
266.106(h) provisions
compliance with 266.102
permit operating
requirements regarded as
266.107 compliance
unless evidence indicates
otherwise; modification or
revocation and re-
issuance of permit under
270.41
CHtCKUST
REFERENCE
85
85,94
85
85
85
85
FEDERAL RCW CITATION
266.1 07 (d)
266.107(d)(1)
266.107(d)(2)
266.107(e)
266.107(f)
266.107(g)
266.1 07 (h)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRW.
GENT
BROADER
m SCOPE
16
Page 85 of 121
DCBIF94J.1S ~R»viM* 09/29/9*
Print** 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
t
CHECKLIST
Befaaacur^c
ncrc'vnbc
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STWN-
6ENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOP£
SMALL QUANTITY ON-SITE BURNER EXEMPTION
owners and operators
that burn hazardous
waste in on-site boiler or
industrial furnace exempt
from 266 Subpart H
requirements provided:
quantity of hazardous
waste burned for a
calendar month does not
exceed limits shown in
table titled 'Exempt
Quantities for Small
Quantity Burner
Exemption" based on
266.106{b){3) terrain-
adjusted effective stack
height; table
maximum hazardous
waste firing rate does not
exceed 1 % of total fuel
requirements on a total
heat input or mass input
basis, whichever results
in the lower mass feed
rate of hazardous waste
minimum heating value of
5,000 Btu/lb
does not contain F020-
F023. F026 or F027
if mixed with non-
hazardous waste,
compliance with
266.108(a) quantity
before mixing
85,94
85,94
85,96
85
85
85
266.108(a)
266,1 08(a)<1)
266.1 08(a)(2)
266.108(a)(3)
266.108(a)(4)
266.1 08 (b)
*
Page 86 of 121
DCHFMJ.15
09/29/94
Prim** 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
equation for implementing
266.108(a}(1) quantity
limits if burning in more
than one exempt on-site
boiler or industrial furnace
one-time signed, written
notification requirements
for small quantity burner
exemption
maintain for at least 3
years sufficient records
documenting quantity
firing rate and heating
value limits compliance.
including quantity burned
per calendar month and
heating value
CHECKLIST
REFEBENCE
85,
94,111
-
85
85
.-
FEDERAL RCflA CITATION
266.1 08(c)
266.1 08(d)
266.108(d)(1)
266.108(d){2)
266.108(d)(3)
266.108(6)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
•
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
LOW RISK WASTE EXEMPTION
waiver of 266.104(a) DRE
standard if device is
operated in conformance
with 266.1 09 (aM1) and
burning will not result in
unacceptable adverse
health effects as per
266. 1 09 (a) (2) procedures
operating requirements
for device
85
85
85,94,96
85
266.109(a)
266.109(a)(1)
266.109(a)(1Hi)
266.109(a)(1)(ii)
266.109(a)(1)
(iii)
266.109(a)(1)
(iv)
Page 87 of 121
DC8IF94J.1S
09/29/94
Primed: 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
procedures to
demonstrate that
hazardous waste burning
will not pose
unacceptable adverse
public health effects
conditions under which
the 266.105 particulate
matter standard is waived
/
CHECKUST
^£KEBC*lf«
rcrcncfiuc
85
85,94
85
85
85,94
FEDERAL RCHA CITATION
266.109(a)(2)
266.109(aM2)(i)
266.109(a)(2)(ii)
266.109(a)(2)
(iii)
266.109(a)(2)
(iii)(A)
266.109(a)(2)
(iiiHB)
266.109(a)(2)
(iv)
266.109OK2)
(iv)(A)
266.109(a)<2)
(ivHB)
266.109(a)(2)
(iv)(C)
266.109(b)
266.109(b)(1)
266.109(b)(2)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
M score
^
„
WAIVER OF DRE TRIAL BURN FOR BOILERS
boilers operating under
266.1 10 requirements
and that do not burn
F020-F023, F026 or
F027 considered in
compliance with
266.104(a) DRE standard.
and trial burn to
demonstrate DRE is
waived; when burning
hazardous waste:
85
266.110
*
-^ —
Page 88 of 121
DC8IF94J.1S • ftoviud: 09/29/94
Print** 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
"primary fuel" defined;
minimum of 50% primary
fuel firing rate,
determined on total heat
or mass input basis,
whichever results in the
greater mass feed rate
boiler load defined and
not less than 40%
minimum as-fired heating
value of 8,000 Btu/lb
conformance with
266. 104(bM1) carbon
monoxide standard;
boilers subject to
266.1 10 DRE waiver not
eligible for 266.104(c)
alternative carbon
monoxide standard
boiler must be water-tube
type that does not feed
fuel using a stoker or
stoker type mechanism
conditions under which
hazardous waste shall be
fired directly into primary
fuel flame zone of
combustion chamber with
an air or steam,
mechanical or rotary cup
atomization system
CHECKIJST
nrrgoriiiri*
mrcncnltfC
85,96
85
85
85
85
85
85,94
85
FEDERAL ftCRA CITATION
266.110(3)
266.110{b)
266.110{c)
266.110(d)
266.110(e)
266.110(f}
266.1 10(f)(1)
266. 11 Off )<2)
266.110(f)(3)
266.1 10{f)(4)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
-•
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
m SCOPE
Page 89 of 121
OC8IFS4J.15
• R»«Md: 09/29/94
Printed: 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
F€DERAl REQUIREMENTS
f
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
STANDARDS FOR DIRECT TRANSFER
266.111 regulations
apply to boilers and
industrial furnaces subject
to 266. 102 or 266. 103 if
direct transfer of
hazardous waste from
transport vehicle to boiler
or industrial furnace
without. use of storage
unit
for 266.1 1 1 , terms have
.meanings given in
266.1 11(b)(1)
"direct transfer
equipment"
"container"
"tank systems" means
direct transfer equipment
when Subparts I and J of
Parts 264 and 265 are
referenced
no direct transfer of
pumpable hazardous
waste from open-top -
container to boiler or
industrial furnace
direct transfer equipment
requirements
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
266.111(a)
266.1 11(b)(1)
intro
266.1 11(b)(1)
266.1 11(b)(1)
266.1 11(b)(2)
266.111(0(1)
266.111(0(2)
•-
Page 90 of 121
DCHFS4J.15 • FtovMd: O9/29/9*
12/21/9*
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541,00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REOUREMENTS
direct transfer of
hazardous waste to boiler
or industrial furnace
conducted so that it does
not result in any
266.1 11(cM3Mi)-(vi)
situation
conditions under which
hazardous waste shall not
be placed in direct
transfer equipment
appropriate controls and
practices to prevent spills
and overflows from direct
transfer equipment or its
secondary containment
system
applying 266.1 11 (b){1)
definition of container,
owners and operators
must comply with:
264.175 containment
requirements
CHECKLIST
tMC'IT'llflll-lff-
^KWJlwC-
85
85
85
85
85
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
266.1 11(c)(3)
266.1 11(c)(3Mi)
266.1 11(c)(3)(ii)
266.111(0(3)
(iii)
266.111(0(3)
(iv)
266.111(0(3)
(v)
266.111(0(3)
(vi)
266.111(0(4)
266.111(0(5)
266.1 11(O(5)(i)
266.1 11(O(5)(ii)
266.1 11(d)
266.1 11(d)(1)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRW-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
•
Page 91 of 121
DC81F94J.1S -RtviM* 09/29/94
PrinMd: 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
use and management
requirements of Subpart 1,
Part 265 requirements,
except 265.170 and
265.174; compliance
with specified
maintenance and
protective distances in
lieu of 265.176
requirements; written
certification by local fire
marshall to be kept on file
264.178 closure
requirements
direct transfer equipment
must meet following
requirements:
secondary containment
requirements for new and
existing equipment
for existing direct transfer
equipment without
secondary containment,
determination whether
leaking or unfit for use;
written assessment
reviewed and certified by
qualified, registered
professional engineer in
accordance with
270. 11(d) by August 21,
1992
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
•
85,96
85
85
85
85
FEDERAL ROTA CITATION
266.1 11(d)(2)
266.1 11(d)(3)
266.111(6)
266.1 11
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
minimum considerations
for assessment
if, due to 266. 111
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9641.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
265.196 compliance for
response to leaks or spills
265.197 closure
compliance, except
265.197{c)(2H4)
,*
CHECKLIST
BpOEBBUfME
ncrmcfwc
85
85
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
266.1 11(e){5)
266.1 11(eK6)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
UESS
STHN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
8ROAOER
IN SCOPE
17 REGULATION OF RESIDUES
residue derived from
burning or processing of
hazardous waste is not
excluded under 261.4(b)
(4), (7) or (8) unless
device and owner or
operator meet the
following requirements:
\
criteria the device must
meet:
demonstration by owner
or operator that
hazardous waste does not
significantly affect residue
by demonstrating
conf ormance with either
of two criteria:
comparison of waste-
derived residue with
normal residue for 261,
Appendix VIII
constituents; procedures
to be used
85,94
85
85,96
85
85
85
266.112
266.112
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
determination of
concentrations of toxic
constituents of concern in
normal residue based on
analyses of a minimum of
1 0 samples representing a
minimum of 10 days of
operation; determine
compositing period not to
exceed 24 hours; upper
tolerance limit (at 95%
confidence with a 95%
proportion of the sample
distribution) for the
statistically-derived
concentration; when to
revise; how to determine
the upper tolerance limit
1 8 sampling and analysis of
waste-derived residue to
determine whether
residue generated during
each 24-hour period has
concentrations of toxic
constituents higher than
266.112(bH1)
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
HEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
1 9 concentration of each
nonmetal toxic
constituent of concern in
waste-derived residue
must not exceed health-
based limits specified in
266, Appendix VII or level
detection using SW-846
analytical procedures; if
no limit in Appendix VII,
limit is 0.002 mg/kg or
level of detection,
whichever is higher;
levels specified in
appendix VII and default
level of 0.002
micrograms/kg or level of
detection as identified in
Note 1 are
administratively stayed;
owner or operator must
comply with alternative
levels defined as land
disposal restriction limits
specified in § 268.43 for
F039 nonwastewaters;
compliance based on
good-faith effort to detect
constituents;
demonstration of good-
faith efforts; stay in
effect until further
administrative action is
taken
for metal constituents, in
extract concentration
obtained using 261.24
TCLP not to exceed 266,
Appendix VII limits
I
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
'
85,111,
t127
85
.
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
266.112(bH2)(i)
266.112(b)(2)
(ii)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRW.
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
Page 96 of 121
DC8F94J IS
O9/29/M
12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541 .OO-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30,1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
sampling and analysis of
waste-derived residue to
determine whether
residue generated during
each 24-hour period has
concentrations of toxic
constituents higher than
health-based levels;
determination of toxic
concentrations based on
analysis of one or more
samples obtained over
24-hour period; for
multiple samples,
concentration of toxic
constituent is arithmetic
mean of concentrations in
samples; no results may
be disregarded
records to document
266.1 1 2 compliance to
be retained until closure
of boiler or industrial
furnace unit; information
to be recorded
t
CHECKUST
BH>*|-BOkl/l'C
raj wjvuc
96
85,96
(
85
:
FEDERAL ROW CITATION
266.112(b)(2)
(iii)
266.112(0
266.112(0(1}
266.112(0(2)
266.112(c)(2)(i)
266.1 12(c)(2)(ii)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STMN-
GENT
MORE
STNN.
GENT
BROADER
m SCOPE
APPENDIX I TO PART 266
TIER I AND TIER II FEED RATE AND EMISSIONS SCREENING LIMITS FOR METALS
Tier I and Tier II Feed
Rate and Emissions
Screening Limits for
Noncarcinogenic Metals
for Facilities in
Noncomplex Terrain (see
56 £i 7228 and 56 £E
32690 or the July 1,
1992CFR)
85,94
Appendix I/
Table I-A
Page 97 of 121
DC8IF94J.1S - R*MM* 09/29/84
Phnf»d: 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REOUWEMENTS
Tier I and Tier II Feed
Rate and Emissions
Screening Limits for
Noncarcinogenic Metals
for Facilities in
Noncomplex Terrain (see
56 ffi 7229)
Tier 1 and Tier II Feed
Rate and Emissions
Screening Limits for
Noncarcinogenic Metals
for Facilities in Complex
Terrain (see 56 FR 7229)
Tier 1 and Tier II Feed
Rate and Emissions
Screening Limits for
Carcinogenic Metals for
Facilities in Noncomplex
Terrain (see 56 FJfj 7230
and 56 £B 32690 or the
July 1, 1992CFR)
Tier 1 and Tier II Feed
Rate and Emissions
Screening Limits for
Carcinogenic Metals for
Facilities in Complex
Terrain (see 56 £B 7230
and 56 ER 32690, or the
July 1,1992 CFR)
CHECKLIST
•MgnRBMnunET
niti uvm^c
85
85
85,94
85,94
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
Appendix I/
Table I-B
Appendix I/
Table I-C
Appendix I/
Table I-D
Appendix I/
Table I-E
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MODE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
W SCOPE
•
-
APPENDIX II TO PART 266
TIER I FEED RATE LIMITS FOR TOTAL CHLORINE
20 Tier I feed rate screening
limits for chlorine for
facilities in noncomplex
and complex terrain (see
56 £B 32690-32691 Or
the July 1, 1992 CFR)
85,94
Appendix II
_
^
Page 98 of 121
118
09/29/94
PMN*d: 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
CHECKLIST
RE^cRENCc
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS
STATI
OTATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STHN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
APPENDIX III TO PART 266
TIER II EMISSION RATE SCREENING LIMITS FOR FREE CHLORINE AND HYDROGEN CHLORIDE
20 Tier II emissions screening
limits for CI2 and HCI in
non-complex and complex
terrain (see 56 FJS 32691
or the July 1, 1992CFR)
85,94
Appendix III
APPENDIX IV TO PART 266
REFERENCE AIR CONCENTRATIONS
Constituents, CAS Nos.
and RAC (see 56 £B
7232 and 56 £R 32691
or the July 1, 1992CFR)
85,94
Appendix IV
APPENDIX V TO PART 266
RISK SPECIFIC DOSES
Constituents, CAS Nos.,
Unit risk and RsD (see 56
F_B 7232-7233 or the July
1, 1992CFR)
85
Appendix V
APPENDIX VI TO PART 266
STACK PLUME RISE
flow rates and exhaust
temperatures (see 56 FR
7233-7234 or the July 1,
1992CFR)
85
Appendix VI
APPENDIX VII TO PART 266
HEALTH-BASED LIMITS FOR EXCLUSION OF WASTE-DERIVED RESIDUES
Metals-TCLP Extract
Concentration Limits (56
£R 7234 and 56 FR.
32691 or the July 1,
1992CFR)
85,94
Appendix VII
Page 99 of 121
DCHFMJ.1S - RmriMMt: 09/Z9/9*
PMntad: 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUMENENTS
Nonmetals-Residue
Concentration Limits (see
56 £R 7234 and 56 £fi
32691 or the July 1,
1 992 CFR); include note
regarding administrative
stay of specified and
default levels for
constituents specified in
i 266.112{b){1) provided
owner or operator
complies with alternative
levels defined in
266.112
-------
1
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
21, ISCST Predicted
22 Maximum Concentrations
(see 56 £5 32772-
32773; 57 £fi 38566;
and 57 £B 44999)
21 Simplified Land Use
Classification Procedure
for Compliance with Tier I
and Tier II Limits (see 56
£E 32782-32783 or the
July 1, 1991 CFR;and57
EB 38566)
21 , Statistical Methodology
23 for Bevill Residue
Determinations (see 56
Ffi 4251 6 & 4251 7)
'21 Special procedures for
chlorine, HCI and Cl* (see
56 FR 32786-32787 and
56 FR 425 1 2, Corrections
6 and 7 under Part 270;
note these corrections
should have been placed
under Part 266)
24 Statistics (see 56 Ffi
32796 or the July 1 ,
1992CFR)
i
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
85,94,
111,114
85,
94,1 1 1
85,94,96
85,94,96
85,94
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
Appendix IX/
Section 5.0/
Table 5.0-5
Appendix IX/
Section 6.0
Appendix IX/
Section 7.0
Appendix IX/
Section 9.2
Appendix A to
Appendix IX
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STNN.
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
25
APPENDIX X TO PART 266-(REMOVED)
GUIDELINE ON AIR QUALITY MODELS (REVISED)
removed
85,94,
125
Appendix X
APPENDIX XI TO PART 266
LEAD-BEARING MATERIALS THAT MAY BE PROCESSED IN EXEMPT LEAD SMELTERS
Page 101 of 121
DCBIFMJ.IS - RwriMd: 09/29/94
Prinwd: 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
add new appendix
addressing lead-bearing
materials that may be
processed in exempt lead
smelters (see 56 Fg
42517)
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
96
.
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
Appendix XI
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STFJN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
APPENDIX XII TO PART 266
NICKEL- OR CHROMIUM-BEARING MATERIALS THAT MAY BE PROCESSED IN EXEMPT NICKEL-
CHROMIUM RECOVERY FURNACES
add new appendix
addressing nickel or
chromium-bearing
materials that may be
processed in exempt
nickel-chromium recovery
furnaces (see 56 FR
42517)
96
Appendix XII
PART 270 - EPA ADMINISTERED PERMIT PROGRAMS:
THE HAZARDOUS WASTE PERMIT PROGRAM
SUBPART B - PERMIT APPLICATION
26 SPECIFIC PART B INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS FOR BOILERS AND INDUSTRIAL FURNACES
BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTE
owners and operators
subject to 266.104-
266.107 must conduct a
trial burn and must submit
a trial bum plan or results
in accordance with
270.66
waiver of trial burn to
demonstrate conformance
with a particular emission
standard under 266.104-
266. 107 and 270.22(a)
data in lieu of a trial burn
as 270.22(a)(6) specifies
85
85
85
270.22(a)(1)
270.22
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
boiler owners and
operators seeking to be
permitted under
266.104(a)(4) and
266.1 10, must submit
documentation showing
boiler compliance with
special operating
requirements at 266.1 10;
trial burn waived
information that must be
submitted for boilers and
industrial furnaces
seeking to be permitted
under the low risk waste
provisions of 266.104(a)
(5) and 266.109(a)
without a trial burn
CHECKLIST
BCECDnjf*C
fWrdlENwC
85
85
85,94
85
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
270.22(a)(2)(i)
270.22
(C)
270.22(a)(2)(ii)
(D)
270.22(a)(2)(ii)
(E)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
• LESS
STWN-
GENT
MORE
STNN-
GENT
BROAOER
IN SCOPE
Page 103 of 121
OCBIF94J.1S - RwiMd: 09/29/9*
Plimwl: 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
information that must be
submitted when seeking
to be permitted under Tier
I metals feed rate
screening limits at
266.106(b)&(e) without a
trial bum
when seeking to be
permitted under the tow
risk waste provisions of
266.109(b) which waives
the particulate standard,
submit documentation
supporting 270.22{a}(2)
and (a)(3)
conformance
information to be
submitted when seeking
to be permitted under Tier
1 feed rate screening
limits for total chloride
and chlorine under
266.107(b)(1) and (e)
provisions without a trial
burn
!
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
85
85
85
85,94
:
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
270.22(a) (3)
270.22
-------
I
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL. REQUIREMENTS
owner or operator may
seek exemption from trial
burn requirements
demonstrating 266.104-
266.107 conformance, by
providing information
from previous compliance
testing of the device or
compliance testing or trial
bums of similar boilers or
industrial furnaces;
burning similar wastes
under similar conditions
270.66 design and
operation information
required; conditions under
which Director shall
approve a permit
application in lieu of a trial
burn; additional
information to be
submitted
for a waiver from any trial
burn:
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
85,94
85
.-
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
270.22(a)(6)
270.22(aM6Mi)
270.22(a){6)(i)
(A)
270.22(a)(6)(i)
(B)
270.22(a)(6)(i)
(C)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STHN-
GENT
MORE
STRW-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
.
Page 105 of 121
DCBtfMJ.15 . Rivind: 09/29/9*
Printed: 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9841.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
for a waiver of DRE trial
bum, basis for selection
of the POHCs used in
other burns which
demonstrate 266.104(a)
compliance; analysis
should specify 261,
Appendix VIII
constituents in hazardous
waste for which a permit
is sought and any
differences from POHCs
for which data are
provided
^
minimum information to
be submitted for industrial
furnaces with organic
matter in raw materials
requesting an alternative
HC limit under 266.104(f>
when seeking to be
permitted under
266.106{f) alternative
metals implementation
approach, submit
documentation that
ensures 266.106(c) or (d)
compliance and how
approach can be
implemented and
monitored; provide other
information as Director
finds necessary
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
:
85
85
85,94
85
85
.-
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
.
270.22(a)(6Hti)
270.22(b)
270.22(bM1)
270.22(b)<2)
270.22
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9641.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
describe automatic waste
feed cutoff system,
including any pre-alarm
systems
use of direct transfer
operations requires
submittal of information
supporting 266.1 1 1
conformance
demonstration of
266.1 1 2 conformance if
claim is made that
residues are excluded
from regulation
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
85
85
85
.
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
270.22(d)
270.22(e)
270.22(f)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG 1$:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
_
BROADER
M SCOPE
SUBPART D - CHANGES TO PERMITS
27 PERMIT MODIFICATION AT THE REQUEST OF THE PERMITTEE
replace "270.21" with
•270.22" and "and
270.63" with "270.63
and 270.66"
paragraph heading is
changed to "Newly
regulated wastes and
units"
add wording at end of
paragraph regarding the
continued management of
hazardous waste in units
newly regulated as
hazardous waste
management units;
change "wates" to
"wastes"
94
85
85,94
270.42(c)(1Kiv)
270.42(g)
270.42(g)(1)
'
Page 107 of 121
DCBIFMJ 15
Rewind: O9/29/9*
12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
insert "The unit" before
"was in existence"; add
"or newly regulated
waste management unit"
after "characterized
waste"; add "or
regulating the unit" at end
of paragraph; change
"effetive" to "effective"
insert "The permittee"
before "submits"; insert
"or unit" after "waste"
insert "The permittee"
before "is"; insert
"applicable" before
"standards*; change "Part
265" to "Parts 265 and
266 of this chapter"
delete "In the case of
Classes 2 and 3
modifications,"; insert
"The permittee" before
"also"; replace "permit
modification" with "Class
2 or 3 modification";
change "180 days after*
to "180 days of"; add "or
subjecting the unit to
RCRA Subtitle C
management standards" ,
to end of paragraph
/
CHECKLIST
QCCVBAJftp '
l"KrW"n
270.42{g)(1)(iii)
270*2(g)(1)(iv)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
•
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
•
Page 108 of 121
OCKF94J.1&
O9/29/94
PMiMd: 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
insert 'the permittee"
before "certifies"; insert
"each" before "such
unit"; change "Part 265"
to "requirements of Part
265 of this chapter for";
add ", or regulating the
unit as a hazardous waste
management unit" after
"hazardous"; change
"clarify" to "certify";
insert "all" before "these
requirements"; change
"shall lose" to "will lose"
CHECKUST
REFERENCE
85
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
.
270.42(g)(1)(v)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
.EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
28
Page 109 of 121
DC8IF94J.15 - R*vM: 09/29/94
12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
change heading of "L." to
"Incinerators, Boilers, arid
Industrial Furnaces"; in
•LI." &-L.2." replace "a
waste feed rate limit, or
an organic feed rate limit"
with "a feed-stream feed
rate limit, a chlorine/
chloride feed rate limit, a
metal feed rate limit, or
an ash feed rate limit"; in
"L.3." replace "HCI" with
"HCI/Cla metals,"; in
"L.3." & "L.4." insert .",
boiler, or industrial
furnace" after "incinera-
tor"; in "L.5." replace "."
after "requirements" with
":"; in "L.5.a." insert "or
maximum" before "com-
bustion gas temperature"
& add "flue gas carbon
monoxide and hydro-
carbon concentration,
maximum temperature at
the inlet to the paniculate
matter emission control
system, or operating
parameters for the air
pollution control system"
after "chamber"; change
"L.6." heading to "Bum-
ing different wastes:"; in
"L.6.a." change "incine-
ration" to "burning"; in
"L.6.a. & b." change all
"to incinerate" to "to
burn"; in "7.b." change
"waste incineration" to
"waste burning"; in "L.8."
insert "non-hazardous
waste before "fuel"
CHECKLIST
OCCCBEIdfY
ncrcnEn\*c
85,94
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
270.427
Appendix 1
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRW-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
\
BROADER
IN SCOPE
^^
•
Page 110 of 121
DCBIF94J.1S
O9/29/94
Print*!: 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA IS
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
/
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STNN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
SUBPART F - SPECIAL FORMS OF PERMITS
PERMITS FOR BOILERS AND INDUSTRIAL FURNACES BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTE
new boilers and industrial
furnaces subject to
270.66(b}-(f); those under
interim status standards
of 266. 103 subject to
270.66(g)
permit for new boiler or
industrial furnace shall
specify appropriate
conditions for the
following operating
periods:
pretrial burn period
described; Director must
establish in Pretrial Burn
Period of permit
conditions, allowable
hazardous waste feed
rates and operating
conditions; extension of
period for up to 720
additional hours; permit
may be modified to reflect
extension as per 270.42
submittal of statement
with Part B that suggests
operating conditions, for
266.104-266.107
compliance during period,
including restrictions on
266.102(e) operating
requirements
85
85
85
85
270.66(a)
270.66(b)
270.66(b)(1)
270.66(b)(1)(i)
Page 111 of 121
DCBIF94J.1S
RcviMd: 09/2904
Printed: 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
review of Part B materials
and specification by
Director of requirements
sufficient to meet
266.104-266.107
performance standards
based on engineering
judgment
for duration of trial burn.
Director establishes
conditions in permit to
determine feasibility of
compliance with
266.104-266.107
standards and to
determine adequate
266.102(e) operating
conditions; applicants
must propose a trial burn
plan as per 270.66(c) and
submit with Part B
for defined minimum
period immediately
following trial burn, during
which submission and
review of trial burn results
and modification of permit
by Director occurs.
Director establishes
operating requirements
most likely to ensure
compliance with
266.104-266.107
standards
/
CHECKLIST
n> rrnriinr
wrcncnwc
85
111,114
85
85
.-
FEDERAL RCflA CITATION
270.66(b)(1)(ii)
270.66(b}(2)
270.66(b)(3)(i)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
Page 112 of 121
DCHF94J.15
09/29/94
Primed: 12/21/M-
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
submittal of statement
with Part B that identifies
operating conditions for
266.104-266.107
compliance during period,
including restrictions on
266.102(e) operating
requirements
review and specification
by Director of
requirements sufficient to
meet 266.104-266.107
performance standards
based on engineering
judgment
for final period of
operation, Director
develops operating
requirements in
conformance with
266.102(e> and 266. 104-
266.107 standards;
Director shall make
necessary modifications
to permit as per 270.42
based on trial burn results
to ensure compliance
information the trial burn
plan must include;
Director may require
supplemental information
analysis of each
feedstream, as fired
/
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
85
85
85,94
85
85
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
270.66(b)(3)(ii)
270.66(b)(3)(iii)
270.66(b)(4)
270.66(c)
270.66(0(1)
270.66(c)(1)(i)
270.66(c)(1)(ii)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
Page 113 of 121
DCWF94J.15
: 09/29/9*
Phnt»d: 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
I
analysis of each
hazardous waste, as fired
detailed engineering
description of boiler or
industrial furnace
detailed description
of sampling and
monitoring procedures
detailed test schedule for
each hazardous waste for
which the trial burn is
planned
detailed test protocol
description of, and
planned operating
conditions for, any
emission control
equipment to be used
procedures for rapid
stopping of hazardous
waste feed and emissions
control if an equipment
malfunction
i
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
85
85,94
85
85
85,94
85
85
85
85
85
85
FEDERAL HCRA CITATION
270.66(c)(2)
270.66(c)(2)(i)
270.66
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REOWflEMENTS
other information Director
finds necessary
trial burn conducted to
demonstrate conformance
with 266.104-266.107
standards under an
approved trial burn plan
findings under which the
Director shall approve a
trial burn plan
submit to Director within
90 days of trial burn
completion a certification
that trial burn was carried
out in accordance with
approved plan and results
of all 270.66(c) required
determinations
submit all data collected
during any trial bum
270.66{d) submissions
must be certified by
signature of person
authorized to sign permit
application or 270.11
report
for DRE trial burn under
266.104(a). Director will
specify trial POHCs; basis
for specification
determinations to be
made based on each trial
burn:
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
270.66(C)(9)
270.66(d)(1)
270.66(d)(2)
270.66(d)(2)(i)
270.66{d)(2)(ii)
270.66(d)(2)(iii)
270.66
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
quantitative analysis of
specified materials in the
feedstreams
determinations needed
when a DRE trial burn is
required under
266.104(a)
quantitative analysis of
stack gas and a
computation showing
conformance with the
emission standard when a
trial bum is required for
chlorinated dioxins and
furans under 266.104(e)
quantitative analysis of
stack gas and
computations showing
conformance with
applicable emission
standards when a trial
bum is required for
paniculate matter, metals,
or HCI/C12 under 266.105,
266.106(c) or (d), or
266.1 07 (b}(2) or (c)
quantitative analysis of
scrubber water, ash
residues, other residues
and products to estimate
fate of trial POHCs,
metals, and
chlorine/chloride when a
trial burn is required for
DRE, metals or HCI/CI2
under 266.104(a),
266.106(c) or (d), or
266.107(b)(2) or (c)
CHECKLIST
•MTCTIfUMT
^ETC^EnirfC
85
85
85,94
85
85
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
270.66(f)(1)
270.66(f)(2)
270.66(f)(2Mi)
270.66(f)(2Mii)
270.66(f)(2)(iii)
270.66(f)(3)
270.66(f)(4)
270.66(f)(5)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
m
W
•
Page 116 of 121
DCMF94J »5
09/29/94
Print** 12/21/S4
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REOXRflEMENTS
identification of sources
of fugitive emissions and
their means of control
continuous measurement
of CO, oxygen, and HC in
stack gas
such other information as
Director specifies
to determine feasibility of
compliance with
266.104-266.107
performance standards
and adequate operating
conditions under
266.103, applicants of
existing devices operated
under interim status must
either prepare and submit
a trial burn plan and
perform a trial burn or
submit 270.22(a)(6)
information; submit trial
burn resujts with Part B
application if plan
approved before Part B
submission; date for
submission; requirements
if submitting trial burn
plan with Part B
application
/
CHECKUST
REFERENCE
85
85
85,94
85
-•
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
270.66(f)(6)
270.66(f)(7)
270.66(f)(8)
270.66(g)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
*
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRW-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
•
SUBPART G - INTERIM STATUS
CHANGES DURING INTERIM STATUS
add new paragraph
regarding the addition of
newly regulated units if a
revised Part A permit
application is submitted
on or before the date the
unit becomes subject to
the new requirements
85
270.72(aM6)
« „..-• *««.. OCWF94J.1S - FbviMd: 09/29/94
Page 1 17 of 121 P*** 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
add new paragraph
regarding the addition of
newly regulated units
under 270.72(a)(6)
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
85
FEDBW. RCRA CITATION
270.72(b)(7)
ANALOGOUS
STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STMH-
GENT
MORE
STMN.
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
TERMINATION OF INTERIM STATUS
insert "which has
achieved interim status
prior to November 8,
1 984, interim status
terminates" before "on
Novembers, 1989"
insert "which has
achieved interim status
prior to November 8,
1984, interim status
terminates" before "on
Novembers, 1992"
85,94
85,94
270.73(f)
270.73(g)
>
•
1 Revision Checklist 85 (February 21, 1991; 56 EB 7134) redesignated the old paragraph (d)(2)
as (d)(3) and introduced a new paragraph (d)(2) into the code. Revision Checklist 94 (July 17,
1991; 56 F_B 32688) made technical corrections to the February 21, 1991 amendatory
language for 261.2 and incorrectly redesignated paragraph (d)(3) as (d)(4) and paragraph
(d)(4) as (d)(5). The Federal code, as of February 21, 1991, did not include 261.2
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9841.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
.*
5 Note that, there is a typographical error in the Federal Register addressed by Revision Checklist
94 (56 FJJ 32692; July 17, 1991). The "§266.4" in the heading should be "§266.40." This
error was corrected by Revision Checklist 96 at 56 FR 42512 (August 27, 1991).
6 This paragraph was entered into the code by Revision Checklist 85 and was modified by
Revision Checklist 96. Subsequently, Revision Checklist 98 issued an administrative stay of
the BIF rule as it applies to coke ovens burning certain hazardous wastes from the coke by-
products recovery process. This administrative stay was removed by Revision Checklist 105
(57 FR 27880; June 22, 1992). Note also that Revision Checklist 98 incorrectly changed the
reference "266.100(b), (c), (d) and (f)" to "266.100(b), (c) and (d)." This error was corrected
by Revision Checklist 111 at 57 FR 38564 (August 25, 1992).
7 Revision Checklist 112 (57 £B 41566, September 10, 1992) removed and reserved Subpart E
of Part 266 and recodified the Subpart E provisions as portions of the new Part 279. To
reflect this change. Revision Checklist 112 revised 266.100(b)(1) to refer to Part 279 rather
than Subpart E of Part 266.
8 Note that the Federal Register addressed by Revision Checklist 85 designated this paragraph
as "266.102(d)(4)(D)." This is a typographical error; the correct designation is
"266.102{d)(4)(iv)." See technical correction at 56 FR 32688 (July 17, 1991; Revision
Checklist 94).
^ There seems to be an error in the Federal Register addressed by Revision Checklist 85.
Federal code refers to "paniculate matter standard in § 266.111 (b)," but 266.111 (b)
addresses definitions of "direct transfer equipment" and "container," not paniculate matter
standards. It appears that the Federal code should likely reference 266.105(a) as it does
contain a paniculate matter standard.
10 Note that in the February 21, 1991 rule addressed by Revision Checklist 85, the subparagraph
designation was not italicized. This is a typographical error. The August 27, 1991 (56 FR
42504; Revision Checklist 96) technical correction fixes this error.
11 Note that the August 27, 1991 Federal Register, which addressed the technical correction for
this citation, has a typographical error; the reference to "266.102(e)(4)(iii)(c)(7) and (2)' in
this citation should be "266.102(e)(4)(iii)(C)(7) and (2)."
12 Note that in the federal Register for Revision Checklist 85, the subparagraph designation was
not italicized. This is a typographical error. The 56 FR. 32688 (July 17, 1991; Revision
Checklist 94) technical correction fixes this error.
13 Note that the July 1, 1992 CFR inadvertently omitted the text to 266.103(c)(1)(iHxiii) and
266.103(c)(3)(ii)-(i!i)(C) from the Federal code. States should incorporate these paragraphs,
as found in the Federal Register addressed by Revision Checklist 85 (56 FJJ 7134; February
21, 1991), and amended by Revision Checklist 94 (56 FR 32688; July 17, 1991).
_ „„.* »-«.. OCBIF94J.1S -*•*»«* 09/29/94.
Page 119 of 121 »*«.* 12/21/9*
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
14 In the Federal Register addressed by Revision Checklist 85, the designation for this
subparagraph is 266.104(g)2. This is a typographical error; the correct designation is
266.104(g)(2). See the technical correction at 56 FR 32689 (July 17, 1991; Revision
Checklist 94).
15 Note that there is an error in the Federal Register for Revision Checklist 111 (57 FR 38558;
August 25, 1992) for this rule. The phrase "dispersion modeling to predict the maximum
annual average off-site ground level contamination for each" appears twice but should only
occur once.
16 In the Federal Register addressed by Revision Checklist 85, the designations for these
subparagraphs are 266.107G/m3" in
the July 16, 1991 Federal Register and the "8G/m3" in the 1991 CFR should read "//g/m3" not
"g/m3" as shown at 57 £R 38566 (August 25,1992).
Page 120 of 121
DCWF94J.15
O9/29/94
PrintMl: 12/21/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00*21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
23 Note that Revision Checklist 96 replaced the old section 7.0 introduced into the code by
Revision Checklist 94. •'
Note that Revision Checklist 85 simply makes an announcement concerning the publishing of
the Appendix at a future date. The Appendix was actually entered into the code by Revision
24
Checklist 94.
25 This appendix was originally introduced by Revision Checklist 94; Revision Checklist 85
merely announced that the appendix would be published at a future date. Revision Checklist
125 removed Part 266 Appendix X and Appendices A, B and C to Appendix X, "Guidelines on
Air Quality Models (Revised)" and changed references to the guidelines in Part 266 to refer to
40 CFR Part 51, Appendix W.
26 Note that this is the same section of code which contained the specific Part B information
requirements for the Wood Preserving listing (55 FR 50450). Thus, the Part B
boilers/industrial furnace requirements were added so that the Part B information requirements
for drip pads were inadvertently removed by the rule addressed by Revision Checklist 85 (56
FR 7134; February 21, 1991). On July 1, 1991 (56 £R 30192; Revision Checklist 92} a
technical correction was published moving the wood preserving requirements to 270.26.
27 States only need to make changes if they have adopted, or plan to adopt, the provisions
addressed by Revision Checklist 54 (53 FR 37912), because 270.42 is not required by
271.14 to be part of a State's permitting program.
28 The paragraph following 270.42(g)(1)(v) in Federal code, i.e., 270.42
-------
-------
1
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
Consolidated Checklist for the Toxicity Characteristics Revisions
as of June 30, 1994
The following consolidated checklist
should replace the existing version in
SAM Appendix K
-------
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST
for the
Toxicity Characteristics Revisions as of June 30, 1994
Note: 1} This checklist consolidates the changes to the Federal code addressed by the Toxicity
Characteristic (TO Rule 155 FR 11798; March 29, 1990; Revision Checklist 74] and subsequent
revisions which have occurred through June 30, 1993, as follows:
Revision Checklist 74 [55 FR 11748 (March 29, 1990), 55 FR 26986 (June 29, 1990)];
Revision Checklist 80 [55 FR 40834 (October 5, 1990), 56 FR 3978 (February 1, 1991), 56
FR 13406 (April 2, 1991)];
Revision Checklist 84 [56 FR 5910 (February 13, 1991)1;
Revision Checklist 108 [57 FR 30657 (July 10, 1992)];
Revision Checklist 117 B [57 FR 23062 (June 1, 1992)]; and
Revision Checklist 119 [57 £fi 55114 (November 24, 1992)].
Note that there have been several technical corrections to the TC Rule preamble. An August 2,
1990 (55 FR 31387) notice corrected a typographical error in an implementation timetable found
in the TC Rule's preamble. This error created confusion among small quantity generators
regarding their notification responsibilities for TC wastes. This rule also extended the period of
time within which affected small quantity generators must comply with the new modification
requirements. An August 10, 1990 (55 FR 32377) notice corrected the August 2, 1990 notice.
On September 27, 1990, a clarification to the March 29 final rule was published in the Federal
Register (55 FR 39409) regarding four implementation issues. This clarification also only affected
the TC Rule preamble.
No final rules were promulgated between June 30, 1993 and June 30, 1994 that affected the TC
rule. Note, Revision Checklist 126 (56 FR 46040; August 31, 1993), however, replaced all
references to the TCLP in Part 261, Appendix II with a reference to the TCLP in SW-846. This
rule also replaced the TCLP in Part 261, Appendix It with a note referencing this publication that
is incorporated by reference at 260.11 (a). This rule is not indicated in the checklist reference
column of this consolidated checklist, but it is referenced in the footnote. This approach was
taken because this rule is not a correction to the TC rule per se; but rather it introduced a new
method of referencing the TCLP.
2) Two interim final rules (55 F_R 40834; October 5, 1990 and 56 FR 3978; February 1, 1991)
and a final rule (56 FR 13406; April 2, 1991) extended the compliance date of the Toxicity
Characteristic (TC) Rule for certain hydrocarbon recovery and remediation operations. This
extension is addressed by Revision Checklist 80 and included in this Consolidated Checklist.
Because a less stringent requirement than that imposed by the TC Rule was in effect until
January 25, 1993, the incorporation by States of this extension is optional.
3) States are strongly encouraged to adopt the Permit Modifications Rule (53 FR 37912;
September 28, 1988; Revision Checklist 54) and the "Christmas Tree Rule" (54 FR 9596: March
7, 1989; Revision Checklist 61) to ease implementation of the Toxicity Characteristic Rule and
future waste listings. While both of these rules are optional, they will greatly reduce the
immediate permit burden resulting from the TC Rule.
OCTC34J.15 - RoviMd: 9/29/94
Page i of 11 pnm«* 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST : Consolidated Checklist for the
Toxicity Characteristics Revisions as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
/
CHECKUST
REFERENCE
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STWN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
__ PART 261 - IDENTIFICATION AND LISTING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
SUBPART A - GENERAL
DEFINITION OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
change "Extraction
Procedure Toxicity
characteristic" to
"Toxicity
Characteristic"
117B
261.3(a)(2)(i)
EXCLUSIONS
replace
"characteristic of EP
toxicity" with
"Toxicity
Characteristic"
replace
"characteristic of EP
toxicity, and do not
fail the test for" with
"toxicity
characteristic for any
other constituent.
and do not exhibit"
insert "arsenical-
treated" after
"discarded"; replace
•characteristic of EP
toxicity" with
"Toxicity
Characteristic for
Hazardous Waste
Codes D004 through
D01 7"; delete "or
reasons," after
"reason"
74
108
74,108
261.4{b){6)(i)
261.4{b)(6)(ii)
261.4(b)(9)
• /
w
^i^
Page 2 of 11
DCTC94J.15 - toviMd: 9/29/94
Pnrtrt: 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9641.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST : Consolidated Checklist for the
Toxicrty Characteristics Revisions as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
add new paragraph
regarding petroleum-
contaminated media
and debris that fail
the 26l.24Toxicity
Characteristic test
(D01 8 through D043
only) and are subject
to Part 280
corrective action
CHECKUST
REFERENCE
74
FEDERAL RCflA CITATION
261.4(b)(10)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STMN.
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
Extension for Specified Hydrocarbon Recovery Operations
add new paragraph;
until January 25,
1 993, exclusion for
injected groundwater
exhibiting the 261.24
Toxicrty
Characteristic that is
infiltrated or
reinjected pursuant to
specified hydrocarbon
recovery operations
existing on or before
March 25, 1991;
extension only until
six months after final
rule publication for
groundwater returned
through infiltration
galleries; conditions
for new operations
involving injection to
qualify for date
extension
80
261.4(b)(11)
Page 3 of 11
DCTC94J.15 - R*v»*d 9/29/94
Printed: 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE No. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST : Consolidated Checklist for the
Toxicity Characteristics Revisions as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL HEQWHEMENTS
operations are
performed pursuant
to a written state
agreement that
includes a provision
to assess the
groundwater and the
need for further
remediation once the
free phase recovery is
completed
3 copy of written
agreement has been
submitted to the
Characteristics
Section, U.S.
Environmental
Protection Agency
4 add new paragraph;
used
chlorofluorocarbon
refrigerants from
totally enclosed heat
transfer equipment.
provided the
refrigerant is
reclaimed for further
use
CHECKLIST
REF0CNCE
80
80
84
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
t
261.4(b)(11)(i)
261.4(b)(11)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CTTATKM
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRH.
QENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
m SCOPE
^^
•1
PCS WASTES REGULATED UNDER TOXIC SUBSTANCE CONTROL ACT
exemption for PCB-
containing wastes,
already regulated
under Part 761
(TSCA), that fail the
26 1.24 Toxicity
Characteristic test
(D0 18 through D043
only)
74
261.8
_~^^___
Page 4 of 11
DCTC94J.15 - ftoviMKl: 9/29/94
PrinMd: 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST : Consolidated Checklist for the
Toxicity Characteristics Revisions as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
/
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
/
CHECKUST
REFERENCE
FEDERAL RCHA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STHN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
SUBPART C - CHARACTERISTICS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC
5 remove "EP" before
"toxicity"; insert
"using the
methodology outlined
in Appendix II" after
"after filtering";
change "purposes" to
"purpose"
1 remove "EP" before
"toxicity"; add D018
through D043 to
Table 1 ; as per
technical correction,
change the word
"hydroxide" in the
contaminant for
D031 to "epoxide";
add new column with
CAS numbers
74
74
261.24(a)
261.24(b)
Page 5 of 11
DCTCS4J.15 • RnriMd: 9/23/94
Print** 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST : Consolidated Checklist for the
Toxicity Characteristics Revisions as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL WOlNflEMENTS
CHECKLIST
nrmirtiii*f
f^roicfw**c
FEDERAL RCHA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUV-
AUENT
LESS
STNN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
TABLE 1. - MAXIMUM CONCENTRATION OF CONTAMINANTS FOR THE
TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC
EPAHW
No.1
DOO4
DOO6
0018
O006
D019
D020
D021
0022
D007
D023
0024
D026
0026
0016
D027
0028
D029
0030
tX)12
0031
noa?
D033
DO34
DOO8
0013
DOO9
O014
0035
D036
D037
D038
0010
DO11
0039
0015
0040
D041
0042
D017
D043
Contaminant
Cadmium
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chromium
nvCrevoJ
p-Cretol
Creaol
2,4-D
1 ,4-DioHorobwizMM .
1 ,2-Diehloroethana
1 , 1 -Dichloroethylene
2,4-Dinitrotoiuene ......
Endrin
Heptechlor (and it* apoxide) .
HexacNorobutadiene
HexacNoroethane
Lead
IJndane
Mercury
MathoxycNor
Methyl ethyl ketone
PentracHorophenol ... ...
Selenium
Silver
Tetraohloroethytena
Toxaphane
TrioNoroethylene
2,4,5-Trichlorophanol
2.4,6-TricNorophenol
2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
Vinyl chloride
CAS No. '
744O-38-2
744O-39-3
71-43-2
744O-43-9
56-23-6
57-74-9
108-90-7
67-66-3
7440-47-3
95-48-7
108-39-4
106-44-5
94-76-7
106-46-7
107-06-2
76-36-4
121-14-2
72-20-8
76-44-8
118..7A.1
87-68-3
67-72-1
7439-92-1
68-89-9
7439-97-6
72-43-5
78-93-3
98-95-3
87-86-6
1 10-86-1
7782-49-2
7440-22-4
127-18-4
8001-36-2
79-01-6
96-95-4
88-06-2
93-72-1
75-O1 -4
Regulatory
Level
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST : Consolidated Checklist for the
Toxicity Characteristics Revisions as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
*,
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
SUBPART D - LISTS OF HAZARDOUS WASTES
GENERAL
replace "EP Toxic
Waste" in the hazard
codes and in the text
following the hazard
codes with "Toxicity
Characteristic Waste"
74
261.30{b)
APPENDIX II TO PART 261
METHOD 1311 TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC LEACHING PROCEDURE (TCLP)
5, EP toxicity test
6 procedures are
replaced by Method
1311 Toxicity
Characteristic
Leaching Procedures
{TCLP)
74
Appendix II
Withdrawal of Spike Recovery Correction Requirement From Method 1311 TCLP
change "data is" to
"data are"; delete
sentence regarding
bias determined from
matrix spike
determination and
parenthetical
reference phrase
following it
change "may not be
not less" to "may not
be less"
remove subparagraph
119
119
119
Appendix II, 8.2
Appendix II,
8.2.2
Appendix II,
8.2.5
Page 7 of 11
DCTCS4J.15 • R»VM* 9/29/94
Prinud: 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST : Consolidated Checklist for the
Toxicity Characteristics Revisions as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
redesignate former
8.4 as 8.5; add new
8.4 and
subparagraphs
addressing use of
internal calibration
quantitation methods
former 8.4 becomes
8.5
f
CHECKUST
REFERENCE
119
119
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
Appendix II, 8.4
Appendix II,
8.4.1
Appendix II,
8.4.2
Appendix II,
8.4.3
Appendix II,
8.4.4
Appendix II, 8.5
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQIHV.
ALENT
*
'
LESS
STIW-
GENT
MORE
STWN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
8
9
PART 264 - STANDARDS FOR OWNERS AND OPERATORS OF HAZARDOUS
WASTE TREATMENT, STORAGE, AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES
SUBPART N - LANDFILLS <
DESIGN AND OPERATING REQUIREMENTS
replace "EP toxicity
characteristics" with
"Toxicity
Characteristic"; insert
"with EPA Hazardous
Waste Numbers
D004 through D01 7"
after "chapter"
74
264.30 1(e)(1)
Page 8 of 11
DCTC94J.16 • taviMd. 9/29/94
Printed: 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9641.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST : Consolidated Checklist for the
Toxicity Characteristics Revisions as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
CHECKLIST
fv^QCMGE
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STWN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
PART 265 - INTERIM STATUS STANDARDS FOR OWNERS AND OPERATORS OF
HAZARDOUS WASTE TREATMENT, STORAGE, AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES
SUBPART K - SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
replace "EP toxicity
characteristics* with
"Toxicity
Characteristic"; insert
"with EPA Hazardous
Waste Numbers
D004 through D01 7"
after "chapter"
74
265.221 (d)(1)
SUBPART M - LAND TREATMENT
WASTE ANALYSIS
replace "exceed"
with "equal or
exceed"; replace "EP
toxicity
characteristic" with
"Toxicity
Characteristic"
74
265.273(a)
SUBPART N - LANDFILLS
DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
10
replace "EP toxicity
characteristics" with
"Toxicity
Characteristic"; insert
", with EPA
Hazardous Waste
Numbers D004
through D017" after
"chapter"
108
265.301(dH1>
Page 9 of 11
DCTC94J.15 • RcviNd: 9/29/84
Print** 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9641.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST : Consolidated Checklist for the
Toxicity Characteristics Revisions as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
,•
CHECKLIST
imnt!flekM*c
rVl LJKJVlA
FEDERAL RCRA OTATtON
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STWN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
PART 268 - LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS
APPENDIX I TO PART 268
TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC LEACHING PROCEDURE (TCLP)
5, replace Appendix
1 1 with note stating the
TCLP is located in
Appendix II of Part
261
74
Appendix I
1 Also see technical corrections to the rule at 55 JFg 26986 (June 29, 1990).
2 See the immediate final rules at 55 £B 40834 (October 5, 1990) and 56
1991) and the final rule at 56 ffi 13406 (April 2, 1991).
6
3978 (February 1,
A copy of the agreement should be sent to EPA's Characteristics Section; thus, this reference
should remain in a State's code. A copy of the written agreement may also be sent to th
State, if the State chooses to include this requirement.
The final rule (56 EB 5910, February 13, 1991) which introduced this paragraph into the
Federal code is considered "narrower in scope" because it narrows the wastes which are
regulated, by excluding from regulation certain chlorofluorocarbon refrigerants as specified at
261.4(b){12).
Revision Checklist 74 added the TCLP at Part 261, Appendix II. Note, however, that Revision
Checklist 126 CSS EB 46040; August 31,1993), a non-TC checklist, replaced the TCLP
(method 1311) in Appendnc II to Part 261 with a note referencing the TCLP "Test Methods for
Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods" as incorporated by reference at
260.11 (a). All references to Part 261, Appendix II and Part 268. Appendix IX were revised to
reflect these changes. Revision Checklist 126 did not revise the content nor the intended use
of the TCLP or the EP toxidty methods.
Because the June 29, 1990 (55 FR 26986) notice made extensive corrections to Appendix II,
Part 261, the Appendix in that notice should be used instead of the one in the March 29,
1990 (55 ffi 11798) notice.
7 On June 29, 1990 (55 EB 26986; Revision Checklist 74), EPA promulgated a final rule which
made technical corrections to the March 29, 1990 final rule, including the regulatory language
in 40 CFR Part 261, Appendix II. Those corrections reorganized the TCLP in 40 CFR Part
261, Appendix II and included adding a requirement for the spike recovery correction. The
November 24,1992 rule (57 EB55114; Revision Checklist 119) deleted the requirements j
Page 10 of 11
DCTC84J.16 -ftcvwwl 912919*
Printed: 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST : Consolidated Checklist for the
Toxicity Characteristics Revisions as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
>
spike recovery correction of analytical data. Because such deletions provide for a standard
less restrictive than was Imposed on June 29, 1990, States are not required to include spike
recovery correction when modifying their programs to incorporate the final TCLP.
8 There is a typographical error in the federal Register: "84.4.4" should be "8.4.4."
9 There is a typographical error in the Federal Register: in the table at 8.5, second column
heading, there should be a space between "TCLP" and "extraction."
1 ° There are several errors in the Federal Register for this citation. First, "such waste does not*
should read "such wastes do not" and "261.4 of this chapter" should read "261.24 of this
chapter" as they are found in the July 15,1985, Federal Register at 50 Ffi 28750 (Revision
Checklist 17(H)) and in the 1992 CFR. Second, "Waste Number* should be "Waste
Numbers.."
11 As background, the TCLP was originally promulgated in 268, Appendix I, on November 7,
1986 (51 EB 40572; Revision Checklist 34) for use in the Land Disposal Restrictions (LDR)
program to determine whether certain wastes require treatment prior to land disposal and to
determine whether certain treated wastes meet the applicable treatment standards. The TC
rule and its June 29, 1990 modification promulgated a revised TCLP at 261, Appendix II, with
modifications based on the Agency's own research and public comment. This TCLP is to be
used in both the TC and the LDR programs. The objective of the above footnoted revision to
268, Appendix I, is to assure that the TCLP entered into the code by the November 7, 1986
notice (51 EB 40572; Revision Checklist 34) is removed and replaced by the TCLP entered
into the code and amended by the final rules (55 EB 11798 and 55 £B 26986) addressed by
Revision Checklist 74. The actual placement of the TCLP within a State's code is not that
important, per se; what is important is that a State's code contains only the Revision
Checklist 74 TCLP. States that have not yet adopted Revision Checklist 34 (the first of the
LDR restrictions) need not make this particular revision to 268, Appendix I, as they would not
yet have entered the original Part 268 TCLP into their code. Also, the change on page 7 of
this checklist for 261, Appendix II, assures that they add the Revision Checklist 74 TCLP to
their code. However, such States must be careful when adding the LDR restrictions to their
code, i.e., the Revision Checklist 34 TCLP should not be added at that time-rather, the
Revision Checklist 74 TCLP should remain the only TCLP in their code. States using the
Consolidated LDR Checklist should be sure to read the relevant footnote on that checklist
regarding this issue.
OCTC94J.15 - ItoviMd: 9/29/94
Page 11 of 11 P***: 12/22/9*
-------
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
Consolidated Checklist for the Wood Preserving Listings
as of June 30, 1994
The following consolidated checklist
should replace the existing version in
SAM Appendix K
-------
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST
for the
Wood Preserving Listings
as of June 30, 1994
Note: 1) This checklist consolidates the changes to the Federal code addressed by the following
Wood Preserving Listings checklists:
Revision Checklist 82 [55 FE 50450 (December 6, 1990)];
Revision Checklist 91 [56 FR 27332 (June 13, 1991)];
Revision Checklist 92 (56 EE 30192 (July 1, 1991)];
Revision Checklist 101 [57 £& 5859 (February 18, 1992)); and
Revision Checklist 120 [57 Ffi 61492 (December 24, 1992)].
No final rules were promulgated between January 1, 1993, and June 30, 1994, that affected the
Wood Preserving Listings rule. Therefore, this consolidated checklist is identical to that of
December 31, 1992.
2) This consolidated checklist adds, to the list of wastes from non-specific sources, three broad
categories of wastes from wood preserving processes that use chlorophenolic, creosote, and/or
inorganic (arsenical and chromium) preservatives. These wastes, F032, F034 and F035, include
wastewaters, process residuals, preservative drippage and spent formulations. The listing of
F032 and the permitting and interim status standards applicable to drip pads handling this waste
are promulgated pursuant to HSWA. The listings of F034 and F035, the permitting and interim
standards for drip pads that handle F034 and F035 wastes, and the addition of a test method to
Appendix III of Part 261 are non-HSWA provisions. EPA will implement the addition of F032 to
the list of hazardous wastes from non-specific sources in authorized States until the States
modify their programs and such modifications are approved by EPA. The non-HSWA
requirements are applicable only in those States that do not have interim or final authorization. In
authorized States, the non-HSWA requirements will not be applicable until the States revise their
programs to adopt equivalent requirements under State law, unless the wastes are designated as
hazardous due to the Toxicity Characteristic, which would allow an owner or operator to comply
with the drip pad standards administered under Federal law.
3) Note that double lines are used on the checklists to indicate the beginning and ending of
optional provisions with subparagraphs or requirements that must all be adopted if the optional
provision is adopted.
DCWFLMJ.15 • R*viwd: 09/30/9*
Page 1 of 45 pm*** 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Wood Preserving Listings
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL flEOUMEMENTS
CHECKUST
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRW-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
PART 260 - HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM: GENERAL
SUBPART B - DEFINITIONS
DEFINITIONS
add "drip pad" in
alphabetical order
82
260.10
____ PART 261 - IDENTIFICATION AND LISTING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
SUBPART A - GENERAL ^^_____
1 EXCLUSIONS
Spent Wood Preserving Solutions and Wastewaters
add new paragraph
which excludes as a
solid waste spent
wood preserving
solutions that have
been reclaimed and
are reused for their
original intended
purpose
add new paragraph
which excludes as a
solid waste
wastewaters from
the wood preserving
process that have
been reclaimed and
are reused to treat
wood
82,92
92
261.4(a)(9)(i)
261 .4(a)(9Hii)
'•-
^1%,
(JB
^•T
2 HAZARDOUS WASTES FROM NON-SPECIFIC SOURCES
3 add the waste codes
"F032", "F034" and
"F035" in
alphanumeric order to
list as shown below:
82,t91,
t120
261.31(a)
,4s* —
Page 2 of 45
DCWPL84J.16 • RWM* O9/30/9*
Pnntad: 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Wood Preserving Listings
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
j
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
Industry and EPA
hazardous waste
No.
Hazardous waste
Hazard
code
F032
F034
F035
Waetewaters (except those that have not come into contact with process fT)
contaminants), process residuals, preservative drippage, and spent formulations from
wood preserving processes generated at plants that currently use or have previously
used ehlorophenolic formulations (except potentially cross-contaminated wastes that
have had the FO32 waste code deleted in accordance with I 261.36 of this chapter or
potentially cross-contaminated waetes that are otherwise currently regulated as
hazardous wastee (i.e., F034 or FO36), and where the generator does not resume or
initiate use of chlorophenolic formulations). This listing does not include K001 bottom
sediment sludge from the treatment of wastewater from wood preserving processes that
use creosote and/or pentacHorophenol.
Wastewatera (except those that have not come into contact with process (T)
contaminants), process residuals, preservative drippaga, and spent formulations from
wood preserving processes generated at plants that use creosote formulations. This
listing doee not include KOO1 bottom sediment sludge from the treatment of wastewater
from wood preserving processes that use creosote and/or pantachlorophenol.
Wastewaters (except those that have not coma into contact with process (T)
contaminants), process residuals, preservative drippaga, and spent formulations from
wood preserving processes generated at planta that use inorganic preservatives
containing arsenic or chromium. This listing does not include K001 bottom sediment
sludge from the treatment of wastswater from wood preserving processes that use
creoeote and/or pentachlorophenol.
remove the
administrative stay
addressed in
Footnote 1 of the
261.31 table
t91,120
261.31(a)/table
•
Page 3 of 45
DCWPL94J.15
09/30/94
Primed: 12/22/9*
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9641.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Wood Preserving Listings
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
i
CHECKLIST
(MH£eOEUf*C
nCrWHuC
FEDERAL BOW CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUtV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STUN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
DELETION OF CERTAIN HAZARDOUS WASTE CODES FOLLOWING EQUIPMENT CLEANING AND
REPLACEMENT
wastes from wood
preserving processes
at plants that do not
resume or initiate use
of chlorophenolic
preservatives will not
meet the listing
definition of F032
once the 261 .35(b)
and Cc) requirements
are met; wastes may
continue to meet
another hazardous
waste listing
description or exhibit
one or more
characteristics
generators must
either clean or replace
all specified process
equipment that may
have come into
contact with
chlorophenolic
formulations or
constituents
generators shall do
one of the following:
prepare and follow an
equipment cleaning
plan; clean equipment
in accordance with
261.35
82
82,92
82,92
92
261.35(a)
-
261.35(b)
261.35{b)(1)
261.35(b)(1)(i)
•
w
Page 4 of 45
DCWPLMJ.15 -R*va*d 09/30/9*
Pnnltd. 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Wood Preserving Listings
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
prepare and follow an
equipment
replacement plan;
replace equipment in
accordance with
261.35
6 document cleaning
and replacement in
accordance with
261.35, carried out
after termination of
use of chlorophenolic
preservatives
cleaning requirements
prepare and sign a
written equipment
cleaning plan that
describes:
equipment to be
cleaned
how equipment will
be cleaned
solvent to be used in
cleaning
how solvent rinses
will be tested
how cleaning
residues will be
disposed
equipment must be
cleaned as follows:
remove all visible
residues from process
equipment
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
92
92
82,92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
FEDERAL ROW CITATION
261.35(b)(1)(ii)
•v
261.35
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Wood Preserving Listings
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
rinse with appropriate
solvent until no dioxin
or dibenzofuran
detection in final
solvent rinse
analytical
requirements
test rinses as per
SW-846, Method
8290
"not detected*
defined
generator manages
cleaning process
residues as F032
waste
replacement
requirements
prepare and sign
written equipment
replacement plan that
describes:
equipment to be
replaced
how equipment will
be replaced
how equipment will
be disposed
generator must
manage discarded
equipment as F032
waste
documentat i
requirements
%
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
92
92
92
92
92
82,92
92
92
92
92
92
92
FEDERAL HCRA CITATION
261 .35(b)(2)(ii)
(B)
261.35(bH2)(iii)
261.35{bH2){iii)
(A)
261 .35(b}(2)(iii)
(B)
261.35(b)(2)(iv)
261.35(b)(3)
261 .35{bH3)(i)
261.35(b)(3)(tHA)
261.35(b)(3)(i){B)
261.35(b)(3)(i)(C)
261 .35(b)(3)(ii)
26!.35(b)(4)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STHN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
*-
Page 6 of 45
DCWFLMJ.15 • Rwwtf O9/3O/9*
Pnr*«a 12/22/9*
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Wood Preserving Listings
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUREMENTS
document previous
equipment cleaning
and/or replacement
performed in
accordance with
261.35 and occurred
after cessation of
chlorophenolic
preservative use
documentation that
must be maintained
as part of the
facility's operating
record
name and address of
the facility
formulations
previously used and
the date on which
their use ceased in
each process at the
plant
formulations currently
used in each process
at the plant
equipment cleaning or
replacement plan
name and address of
any persons who
conducted the
cleaning and
replacement
dates on which
cleaning and
replacement were
accomplished
i
CHECKUST
REFERENCE
92
82
82
82
82
82
82
82
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
261.35(b)(4)(i)
261.35(c)
261.35(0(1)
261.35(0(2)
261.35(0(3)
261.35(0(4)
261.35(0(5)
261.35(0(6)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
AUENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
-
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
Page 7 of 45
DCWPL94J.1S
09/30/94
Minted: 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Wood Preserving Listings
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQINREMENTS
dates of sampling and
testing
description of sample
handling and
preparation
techniques
description of the
tests performed, the
date, and the results
of the tests
name and model
numbers of the
instrument(s) used in
performing the tests
QA/QC
documentation
signed certification
statement
f
CHECKLIST
MHM-gg».|MC
ncrwnwc
82
82
82
82
82
82
FEDERAL ROM CITATION
261.35
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Wood Preserving Listings
' as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
CHECKUST
ncBCacur*K
ncrcTicnivC
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
TABLE 1. - ANALYSIS METHODS FOR
ORGANIC CHEMICALS CONTAINED IN SW-846
Compound
Method No*.
. BanzoflO fluoranthana 8100,8250,8270.8310
APPENDIX VII TO PART 261
BASIS FOR LISTING HAZARDOUS WASTE
add "F032", "F034",
and "F035" to list in
alphanumeric order as
shown below:
82
Appendix VII
EPA hazardous Hazardous conatituanta
waata No. for which liatad
F032
F034
F035
Banz(a}anthracene, benzo(a)pyrana, dibanz(a.h)-anthracane, indano(1,2,3-od)pyrane,
pantachlorophanol, araanic, chromium, tetra-, panta-, haxa-, hoptachlorodibenzo-p-
dioxin*, tatra-, panta-, haxa-, haptachlorodibanzofurana.
Banz(a)anthracane, banzo{k)fluoranthena, banzo(a)pyrana, dibanz(a,h)anthracana,
indano(1,2,3-cd)pyrana, naphthalene, araanic, chromium.
Araanic, chromium, laad.
APPENDIX VIII TO PART 261
HAZARDOUS CONSTITUENTS
add the specified
hazardous
constituents in
alphabetical order as
shown below:
82
Appendix VIII
Page 9 of 45
DCWPL94J.1S - toviMd: 09/30/94
PiinMd: 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Wood Preserving Listings
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL HEOUMEMENTS
CHECKLIST
•^V«V>MMh|Mg
wrwPiMC
FEDERAL RCHA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
CQUV
ALENT
LESS
STOW-
GENT
MORE
STHN-
GENT
BROADER
m SCOPE
Chwnieal
abstract*
CoffiiYion
abstract*
No.
Hazardoui
waste No.
B*nzo(k)fhioranth«fM
Some
207-O8-9
HdptcoNorodibamofuraiw .
HaptwNorodJbmzo-p-dimdn
PART 262 - STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO GENERATORS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
SUBPART C - PRE-TRANSPORT REQUIREMENTS
7,8 ACCUMULATION TIME
the waste is placed:
in containers and
generator complies
with Subpart I of Part
265; and/or
in tanks and
generator complies
with Subpart J of
Part 265, except
265.197(c)and
265.200; and/or
on drip pads and
generator complies
with Subpart W of
Part 265 and
maintains following
records:
92 •
92
92
t82,92
262.34(a)(1)
262.34
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.OO-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Wood Preserving Listings
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
description of
procedures to ensure
all wastes are
removed from drip
pad and associated
collection system at
least once every 90
days
documentation of
each waste removal,
including quantity,
date and time of
removal; generator
exempt from
Subparts G and H of
Part 265, except
265.111 and
265.114
date each period of
accumulation begins
is marked and visible
;
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
t82,92
T82,92
82,92
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
262.34(a)UKiii)
(A)
262.34
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
COIMf. DLIDATED CHECKLIST: Wood Preserving Listings
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
/
CHECKLIST
•MHP t*nf!+tt*fi
ncrcncnmi
FEDERAL RCflA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
FQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRM-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
10
SUBPART W - DRIP PADS
APPLICABILITY
Subpart W applies to
owners and operators
of facilities that use
new or existing drip
pads to convey
treated wood
drippage.
precipitation, and/or
surface water run-off
to an associated
collection system;
existing drip pads
defined; applicability
of 264.573(b)(3) leak
collection system
requirement
owner or operator of
certain drip pads
inside or under a
structure not subject
to 264.573(6} or
264.573(f)
regulations, as
appropriate
Subpart W
requirements not
applicable to
management of
infrequent, incidental
drippage in storage
yards provided:
82,92,
120
82,92
120
264.570{a)
264.570(b)
264.570(c)
^•t
J|
Page 12 of 45
DCWPWJ.15
RcviMd: 09/30/94
Printed: 12/22/9*
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Wood Preserving Listings
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
owner or operator
maintains and
complies with a
written contingency
plan describing how
owner or operator
will respond
immediately to
discharge of
infrequent and
incidental drippage;
at a minimum, what
the contingency plan
must describe
CHECKLIST
REFEREnCC
120
FEDERAL ROTA CITATION
264.570(0(1)
264.570(c)(1)(i)
264.570(c)(1)(ii)
264.570(0(1 )(iii)
264.570(c)(1)(iv)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
ASSESSMENT OF EXISTING DRIP PAD INTEGRITY
evaluation of existing
drip pads; by June 6,
1991, written
assessment obtained
and kept on file;
annual review.
update and
recertification
required until
264.573 standards
are met, except
264.573(b) standards
for liners and leak
detection systems
82,92,
120
264.571 (a)
Page 13 of 45
DCWPL94J.15 • RcviMd: 09/30/94
Print** 12/22/34
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541 .OO-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Wood Preserving Listings
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL flEQU«B*NTS
development of
written plan for
upgrading, repairing
and modifying drip
pad to meet
264.573(b)
requirements;
submittal of plan to
Regional
Administrator no later
than 2 years before
completion of
modifications; written
plan documentation.
review and
certification
requirements
removed
submittal of required
drawings and
certification to
Regional
Administrator or
State Director upon
completion of all
upgrades, repairs.
and modifications
if drip pad found to
be leaking or unfit for
use, compliance with
264.573(m)
provisions or close
drip pad in
accordance with
264.575
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
82,92,
120
82,120
82,92
82,92
.
FEDERAL RCM CITATION
- -
264.57 Kb)
264.57 1(b)(1)
264.57 1(b)(2)
264.57 1(b)(3)
264. 57 1(c)
.
264.571 (d)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
*
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
1
BROADER
IN SCOPE
11,
12
12
Page 14 of 45
OCWFIS4J.15
RcvMd 09/30/94
Print** 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Wood Preserving Listings
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
.-
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
13 DESIGN AND INSTALLATION OF NEW DRIP PADS
owners and operators
of new drip pads
must ensure that the
pads are designed,
installed and operated
in accordance with
one of the following:
all of the
requirements of
264.573 (except
264.573(a)(4».
264.574 and
264.575
all of the
requirements of
264.573 (except
264.573(5)),
264.574 and
264.575
82,92,
120
120
120
264.572
264.572(8)
264.572(b)
13 DESIGN AND OPERATING REQUIREMENTS
drip pads must:
be constructed of
non-earthen
materials, excluding
wood and non-
structurally supported
asphalt
be sloped for free-
drainage to the
associated collection
system
have a curb or berm
around the perimeter
82,92
82,92
82,92
82,92
264.573(a)
264.573(a)(1)
264.573(a)(2)
264.573(8X3)
Page 15 of 45
DCWPL94J.15
ft«v«d: 09/3O/94
Wnttd: 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Wood Preserving Listings
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
14, hydraulic conductivity
15, requirements;
1 6 maintain surface free
of cracks and gaps;
sealing material must
be chemically
compatible with
preservatives that
contact pad;
requirements apply to
existing drip pads and
drip pads of
owners/operators
electing to comply
with 264.572(a)
14 owner or operator
must obtain and keep
at the facility written
assessment of drip
pad certified by
independent qualified
registered engineer;
assessment must
attest to results of
evaluation;
assessment must be
reviewed, updated
and recertified
annually; evaluation
must document
extent to which drip
pad meets 264.573
(except 264.573(b))
design and operating
standards
1 7 remove notes
regarding
administrative stays
for new and existing
drip pads
**
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
82,92,
120
^
120
t91,92.
t101.
120
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
264.573(a)(4)(i)
•
264.573(a)(4)(ii)
264.573(a)(4)/
notes
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRM-
GENT
MORI
STHN-
GENT
BROADEN
IN SCOPE
_
A
w
A, —
Page 16 of 45
DCWFLMJ.15
09/30/94
PrinMd: 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Wood Preserving Listings
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
18 be of sufficient
structural strength
and thickness to
meet specified
conditions
1 9 if owner/operator
elects to comply with
§ 264.572
264.573(b)(1)(iii)
264.573(b)(2)
264.573(b){2)(i)
264.573(b)(2)(i)
(A)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BAOAOER
IN SCOPE
Page 17 of 45
DCWFL94J.1S • RmiiMd 09/30/94
PnnMd 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Wood Preserving Listings
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REOMREMENTS
of sufficient strength
and thickness to
prevent collapse
designed and
operated to function
without clogging
through the
ischeduled closure of
the drip pad; and
designed to detect
drip pad failure or the
release of hazardous
waste or
accumulated liquid at
the earliest
practicable time
leakage collection
system immediately
above the liner
designed,
constructed,
maintained and
operated to collect
leakage from below
the drip pad; date,
time and quantity of
leakage collected
must be documented
in operating log
maintenance of drip
pads; note regarding
remedial action
convey, drain, and
collect liquid resulting
fror opage or
prec tion in order
to p M run-off
»
CHECKLIST
rMfrtiftiiiT
W^M umwc
82,92
82,92
82,92
120
82,92
82,92 ;
FEDERAL KM CITATION
264.573(b)(2)(i)
(B)
264.573(b)(2Kii)
264.573(b)(2)(iit)
264.573(b)(3)
264.573(0
264.573(d)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STUB*.
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
•
Page 18 of 45
DCWPL94J.1S
09/30194
Printed: 12/22/9*
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9641.00-21
; SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Wood Preserving Listings
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
run-on control system
requirements
run-off management
system requirements,
unless system is
protected by a
structure, as
described in
264.570(b)
evaluation of drip pad
for compliance with
264.573(aHf)
requirements; design
certification required
removal of drippage
and accumulated
precipitation from
associated collection
system as necessary
to prevent overflow
onto the drip pad
thorough cleaning of
drip pad surface in a
manner and
frequency to meet
specified conditions;
documentation of
date, time and
cleaning procedure in
facility's operating
log; owner/operator
must determine
whether residues are
hazardous under
262.11 and, if so,
manage them
according to Parts
261-268, 270 and
RCRA §3010
CHECXUST
REFERENCE
82,92
82,92
82,92
82,92
82,92,
120
.
FEDERAL ROW CITATION
264.573(e)
264.573(f)
264.573(g)
,
264.573(h)
.
264.573(0
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
m SCOPE
Page 19 of 45
DCWPL94J 15
RtvMd 09/30/94
Prnntdr 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Wood Preserving Listings
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
minimize tracking of
hazardous waste or
constituents off the
drip pad
after removal from
treatment vessel,
treated wood from
pressure and non-
pressure processes
must be held on pad
until drippage has
ceased;
documentation
required
collection and holding
unite for run-on and
run-off control
systems emptied or
otherwise managed
as soon as possible
after storms to
maintain design
capacity
throughout the active
life of the drip pad
and as specified in
the permit, repair of
detected condition
that may have caused
or has caused a
release of hazardous
waste within a
reasonable period of
time, in accordance
with the following
procedures:
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
82,92
82,92
82,92
82,92
_
FEDERAL RCHA CITATION
264.573(j)
-
264.573(10
264.573(1)
264.573(m)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STUN-
GENT
,
1
MORE
STUN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
t
1
>.
Page 20 of 45
DCWPLS4J.15 - RtvMd: 09/30/94
Pnm»d: 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO.
9541 .00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Wood Preserving Listings
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
upon detection of a
condition that may
have caused or has
caused a release of
hazardous waste, the
owner must:
enter discovery in the
facility operating log
immediately remove
from service affected
portion of drip pad
determine steps to
repair drip pad and
clean up any leakage;
establish schedule for
repairs
notify Regional
Administrator within
24 hours after
discovery; provide
'written notice as
specified within 1 0
working days
review, determination
and notification by
Regional
Administrator
20 written notification to
Regional
Administrator and
certification of
compliance with
264.573(m){1){iv)
after repairs and
clean up
,*
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
82,92
82,92
82,92
82,92
82,92
82,92
82,92
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
264.573(m)(1)
264.573{m)(1)(i)
264.573(m)(1)(ii)
264.573(m)(1)(iii)
264.573(m)(1)
(iv)
264.573(m)(2)
264.573(m)(3)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STMM.
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
Page 21 of 45
DCWL94J.1S . R.v
09/30/94
Printed: 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Wood Preserving Listings
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
should a permit be
necessary. Regional
Administrator will
specify in the permit
all design and
operating practices
necessary to ensure
that 264.573
requirements are met
documentation in
operating log, as
specified, of past
operating and waste
handling practices
/
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
82,92
82,92
FEDERAL RCHA CITATION
264.573(n)
264.573(0)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
•
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
13 INSPECTIONS
inspection of liners
and cover systems
for uniformity.
damage and
imperfections during
construction or
installation;
inspection and
certification of liners
to meet 264.573
requirements;
maintenance of
certification as part
of the facility
operating record;
inspection of liners
and covers after
installation
drip pad must be
inspected weekly and
after storms to detect
evidence of any of
the following:
82,92
82,92
264.574(a)
264.574(b)
*
•^a^f
-
___,
Page 22 of 45
DCWFLS4J.1S
Ftovind: O9/3O/S4
Printed: 12/22/84
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9841.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Wood Preserving Listings
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
deterioration,
malfunctions or
improper operation of
run-on and run-off
control systems
presence of leakage
in and proper
functioning of leak
detection system
deterioration or
cracking of drip pad
surface; note
regarding remedial
action
. CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
82,92
82,92
82,92
--
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
264.574(b)(1)
264.574(b)(2)
264.574(b)(3)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
13 CLOSURE
at closure, removal
and decontamination
requirements;
management as
hazardous waste
conditions under
which owner or
operator must close
facility and perform
post-closure care in
accordance with
264.310
requirements; for
permitted units.
permit requirement
continues throughout
post-closure period;
drip pad is considered
a landfill and must
meet Subparts G and
H requirements of
Part 264
82,92
-
82,92
264.575{a)
264.575(b>
Page 23 of 45
DCWPL94J 15
09/30/94
Pnm«d 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Wood Preserving L.-ngs
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
owner or operator of
an existing drip pad
that does not comply
with the 264.573(b)
(1) liner requirements
must:
include in closure
plans for drip pad
under 264.112, a
plan for 264.575O)
compliance and a
contingent plan for
264.575(b)
compliance
prepare a contingent
post-closure plan
under 264.1 18 for
complying with
264.575(b) in case
not air contaminated
subsoils can be
practicably removed
at closure
cost estimates
calculated under
264.1 12 and
264.144 for closure
and post-closure care
of drip pad subject to
264.575(c) must
include the cost of
complying with the
contingent closure
plan and the
contingent post-
closure plan; cost of
expected closure
under 264.575(a)
need not be included
'*
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
82,92
82,92
82,92
82,92
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
264.575(c)(1)
~
264.575(c)(1)(i)
264.575(cM1)(ii)
264.575(0(2)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
-
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
Jj^
•P
••^fl^^— ••-
Page 24 of 45
DCWPL94J.1S
09/30/94
Printed: 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Wood Preserving Listings
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
CHECKLIST
REFERENCE
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS.
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
PART 265 - INTERIM STATUS STANDARDS FOR OWNERS AND OPERATORS OF HAZARDOUS
WASTE TREATMENT. STORAGE AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES
SUBPART j - TANK SYSTEMS
APPLICABILITY
add reference to
paragraph
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Wood Preserving Listings
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERALflEOUREMENTS
owner or operator of
certain drip pads
inside or under a
structure not subject
to 265.443(6) or
26 5. 443 (f)
regulations, as
appropriate
Subpart W
requirements not
applicable to
management of
infrequent, incidental
drippage in storage
yards provided:
owner or operator
maintains and
complies with a
written contingency
plan describing how
owner or operator
will respond to
discharge of
infrequent and
incidental drippage;
at a minimum, what
the contingency plan
must describe
CHECKLIST
iMTfnfiiff
HKrKT^3*WC
82
120
120
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
265.440{b)
265.440(0
265.440(cHD
265.440(c)(1)(i)
265.440(c)(1)(ii)
265.440(c)(1)(iii)
265.440(c)(l)
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Wood Preserving Listings
as of June 30,1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
f
CHECKLIST
rWnclnENCE
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
ASSESSMENT OF EXISTING DRIP PAD INTEGRITY
evaluation of existing
drip pads; by June 6,
1991, written
assessment obtained
and kept on file;
annual review.
update and
recertification
required until
265.443 standards
are met, except for
265.443(b) standards
for liners and leak
detection systems
development of
written plan for
upgrading, repairing
and modifying drip
pad to meet
265.443(b)
requirements;
submittal of plan to
Regional
Administrator no later
than 2 years before
completion of
modifications; written
plan documentation,
review and
certification
requirements
removed
82,120
82,120
82,120
•
265. 441 (a)
265.441(b)
265.441 (b)(1)
265.441 (b)(2)
265.441 (b)(3)
21
21
Page 27 of 45
DCWPL94J 15
R*vMd: 09/30/94
Pnnwd: 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Wood Preserving Listings
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
submittal of required
drawings and
certification to
Regional
Administrator or
State Director upon
completion of all
repairs and
modifications
if drip pad found to
be leaking or unfit for
use, comply with
265.443(m)
provisions or close
drip pad in
accordance with
265.445
^ ,
CHECKLIST
HfeHbHENCE
82
82
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
265.441 (c)
265.441 (d)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
^k
DESIGN AND INSTALLATION OF NEW DRIP PADS
owners and operators
of new drip pads
must ensure that the
pads are designed,
installed and operated
in accordance with
one of the following:
all of the applicable
requirements of
265.443 (except
265.443(a>(4»,
265.444 and
265.445
all of the applicable
requirements of
265.443 (except
265.443{b»,
265.444 and
265.445
82,
120
120
120
265.442
265.442(3)
265.442(b)
Page 28 of 45
DCWFIS4J.1S -R*»**4: 09/30/94
12/22/94
-------
I
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Wood Preserving Listings
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
CHECKLIST
OCECBCWC
ncrwnirfC
r
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STRIN-
GENT
MORE
STRIN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
DESIGN AND OPERATING REQUIREMENTS
22.
23
drip pads must:
be constructed of
non-earthen
materials, excluding
wood and. non-
structurally supported
asphalt
be sloped to free-
drain wastes to the
associated collection
system
have a curb or berm
around the perimeter
hydraulic conductivity
requirements;
maintain surface free
of cracks and gaps;
surface material must
be chemically
compatible with
preservatives that
contact pad;
requirements apply to
existing drip pads and
drip pads of owners/
operators electing to
comply with
265.442(a)
82
82
82
82
82,120
265.443(a)
265.443(a){1)
265.443(a)(2)
265.443(a)(3)
265.443(a)(4)(i)
•
Page 29 of 45
DCWPL94J.15
09/30/94
Print** 12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541 .OO-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Wood Preserving Listings
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
22 owner or operator
must obtain and keep
at the facility a
written assessment
of drip pad certified
by independent
qualified registered
engineer; assessment
must attest to results
of evaluation;
assessment must be
reviewed, updated
and recertified
annually; evaluation
must document
extent to which drip
pad meets 265.443 -
(except 265.443(b))
design and operating
standards
24 remove notes
regarding
administrative stays
for new and existing
drip pads
be of sufficient
structural strength
and thickness to
meet specified
conditions; note
regarding structural
integrity standards
25 if an owner/operator
elects to comply with
§ 2 6 5. 44 2 (b) instead
of § 265,442{a), the
drip pad must have:
/ ,
CHECKLIST
^BCEBCfcw
WrEJUlWC
120
t91.
t101,
120
82
82,120
'.-
FEDERAL RCHA CITATION
265.443(a)(4)(ii)
265.443(a)(4)/
notes
265.443(a)(5)
265. 443 (b)
ANALOGOUS STATE
CITATION
STATE ANALOG IS:
EQUIV-
ALENT
LESS
STUN-
GENT
MORE
STNN-
GENT
BROADER
IN SCOPE
^
Page 30 of 45
DCWPLS4J.1S
09/30/94
12/22/94
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Wood Preserving Listings
as of June 30, 1994 (cont'd)
FEDERAL ACQUIREMENTS
a synthetic liner that
meets certain
specifications
specific requirements
for liner construction
materials
foundation or base
requirements
liner must cover all
surrounding earth
that could come into
contact with the
waste or leakage
leakage detection
system immediately
above the liner;
detection system
must be:
constructed of
materials that are:
chemically resistant
to relevant waste and
leakage
of sufficient strength
and thickness to
prevent collapse
designed and
operated to function
without clogging
through scheduled
drip pad closure
**
CHECKLIST
BKCBnj/*C
^ETC^KN4*C
82
82
82
82
82
82
82
82
92
FEDERAL ROW OTATtON
2 6 5. 44 3 (bid)
265.443(b)(1)(i)
265.443(b)(1)(ii)
265.443(bH1)(iii)
265,443(b)(2)
265.443(b)(2)(i)
265.443
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE NO. 9541.00-21
SPA 15
CONSOLIDATED CHECKLIST: Vood Preserving Listings
as of June 30, ' 3*4 (cont'd)
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
26 designed to detect
the failure of the drip
pad or the presence
of hazardous waste
release or
accumulated liquid at
the earliest
practicable time
leakage collection
system immediately
above the liner
designed,
constructed,
maintained and
operated to collect
leakage from below
the drip pad for
removal; date, time
and quantity of
leakage collected
must be documented
in operating tog
maintenance of drip
pads; note regarding
remedial action
convey, drain, and
collect liquid resulting
from drippage or
precipitation in order
to prevent run-off
run-on control system
requirements, unless
drip pad is protected
by a structure, as
described in
265.440(b)
CHECKUST
REFERENCE
82,92
120 .
82
82
82
FEDERAL RCHA CITATION
265.443{b)(2Miii)
i
265.443(bH3)
265.443 |