United States
          Environmental Protection
          Agency
           Region 5
           230 South Dearborn Street
           Chicago. Illinois 60604
          Water
v>EPA
Environmental
Impact Statement
Draft
Appendices
          Moose Lake-Windemere
          Sanitary District
          Wastewater Treatment System
          Pine and Carlton Counties,
          Minnesota    —     .•.•*+•

-------

-------
   -
105
     DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
                        on the
              PROPOSED WASTEWATER
                TREATMENT SYSTEM
                        for the
     MOOSE LAKE-WINDEMERE SANITARY DISTRICT
       PINE and CARLTON COUNTIES, MINNESOTA
                      Prepared by the
            United States Environmental Protection Agency
                        Region V
                      Chicago, Illinois
                          and
                       WAPORA, Inc.
                      Chicago, Illinois

                        March 1983
                               U.S. Environacntal Protection Agci.r/
                               LUrary, Boon 2404  PM-211-A
                               401 II Stre»t, S.W.
                               Washln«t»», DC  20460

-------

-------
                         LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A    Notice of Intent

Appendix B    Soils Information

Appendix C    Leachate Survey and Well Testing Information

Appendix D    Design Criteria and Component Options for Centralized
              Wastewater Management Systems

Appendix E    Cost Effectiveness Analysis

Appendix F    Analysis of Grant Eligibility

Appendix G    Impacts of On-Site Systems on Soils

Appendix H    Excerpts from the Report on Algae

Appendix I    Metholodology for Population Projections

Appendix J    Water Quality Tables and Figures

Appendix K    Letter to Citizens' Advisory Committee

Appendix L    Paleolimnological Investigation

Appendix M    Transportation Data

Appendix N    Energy Data

-------

-------

             Appendix  A
A-l.   The Notice of  Intent  (NOI)
                                                                    H
                                                                    Z
                                                                    W
                                                                    O

                                                                    w
                                                                    u
                                                                    X
                                                                    PM

                                                                    5!

-------

-------

o
                              UNITED STATES
                    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                                  REGION V
                            230 SOUTH DEARBORN ST.
                            CHICAGO. ILLINOIS 60604
                                                               REPLY TO ATTENTION OF:

                                                                   5WEE/EIS
   JUI,  11 1980
                            NOTICE OF INTENT
    TJD ALL INTERESTED GOVERNMENT AGENCIES,  PUBLIC  GROUPS AND CITIZENS:

In accordance with the procedures  foe  the preparation of Environmental
Impact Statements, an Environmental Review  has  been  performed on the
proposed action described below.
Name of Applicant:
Planning Area:
Proposed Action:
                                    Moose Lake-Windemere
                                    Sanitary Sewec District
                                    Moose lake, Minnesota

                                    The Facilities Planning  area,  as re-
                                    commended by the Minnesota  Pollution
                                    Control Agency (MPCA), includes the
                                    Moose Lake-Windemere Sanitary  Sewec
                                    District and the City of Burnum includ-
                                    ing the Northern Pacific Railroad and
                                    the-coreidor between the Cities of
                                    Moose Lake and Butnum, (see attached
                                    map).  The planning area encompasses
                                    approximately 60 square  miles.   The
                                    majority of the District lies  in
                                    central northern Pine County,  but the
                                    majority of the District's  year  round
                                    population resides in central  southern
                                    Carlton County, Minnesota.   The City of
                                    Moose Lake is the largest incorporated
                                    area of the District having a  1970
                                    population of 1452.  In  addition to
                                    the City of Moose Lake,  the Moose
                                    Lake-Windemere Sanitary  Sewer  District
                                    also serves Windemere Township in
                                    Pine County and Moose Lake  Township
                                    in Carlton County.

                                    The District has prepared,  with grant
                                    assistance from this Agency, a facili-
                                    ties plan which was completed  in
                                    March 1980.  The selected alternative
                                    of the facilities plan proposes to
                                    construct collection sewers around
                                    Island and Sturgeon Lakes,  construct
                          A-l-1

-------
                                  - 2  -

                                         interceptor  sewers and pump stations
                                         to bring Island and Sturgeon Lakes in
                                         the system,  modify existing intercep-
                                         tors,  infiltration/inflow correction
                                         in the Moose lake sewer  system,  rebuild
                                         or  construct a new pump station, con-
                                         struct a storm water  overflow pond and
                                         modify the existing wastewater treat-
                                         ment facility located in the City of
                                         Moose  Lake.

State  and Federal  agency  review of the above proposed project identified the
possibility of  significant environmental impacts involving the following
issues.

A.   Impact on Water Quality

There  was no documentation supporting the need to sewer around island and
Sturgeon Lakes  except that there appears to be public opinion that the
increased degradation of  these  lakes  is caused by failing or  poorly designed
on-site treatment  systems.

3.   Socioeconomic  Impact

The  substantial local costs will probably have a significant impact on the
service area families, particularly those on fixed or lower  incomes in the
Island and Sturgeon Lakes area,  encouraging or forcing them to sell their
property and thus  accelerating  changes in occupancy  patterns.   As presented
in the March 28, 1980 public hearing,  the cost of repairs to the existing
sewer  system and construction of new  interceptors would cost all homes in
Sewer  District  $8.40 a month.   Additionally the cost of the collection system
around island and  Strugeon Lakes would cost those residents another $22.40
per  month assuming a $3,000.00  assessment and  a 50%  grant from Farmers Home
Administration, along with low  interest long-term loans.

C.   Secondary Impact and  Induced Growth

The  probable development  and land  use  change induced by the project, and its
effect on the demand for  future  services, must be assessed.

Consequently, this Agency has determined that  the preparation of an Environ-
mental Impact Statement (EIS) on the  above  project is warranted.

If you or your organization need additional  information,  want to be placed
on the mailing list, and/or wish to participate in the preparation of the
Draft  EIS for the Moose Lake-Windemere Sanitary Sewer  District,  please
contact the EIS Section,  (5WEE)  at  the letterhead address.
       :Guire
      al Administrator
Attachment
                          A-l-2

-------
                    Appendix  B
B-l.  Soils Survey of a Portion of Windemere Township,

      Pine County, Minnesota.



B-2.  Soil Map Plates.



B-3.  Soils Testing Data.



B-4.  Summary and interpretation  of  soils  information.
                                                                          c
                                                                          o
                                                                          (0

                                                                          B
                                                                          o
                                                                          U-l
                                                                          e
                                                                          •H

                                                                          0)
                                                                          o
                                                                          C/3
                                                                          a
                                                                          o
                                                                          Pu

-------

-------
            Appendix  B-l.

 SOIL SURVEY OF PART OF WINDEMERE

TOWNSHIP, PINE COUNTY, MINNESOTA
               BY

        Harlan R. Finney
  Professional Soil Scientist

       1828 Draper Drive
   St. Paul, Minnesota  55113

         November, 1981



-------

-------
                             Contents
                                              Page
Abstract--	------.--.--	.....	.......—    T

Description of Soils	    2
     Identification Legend-	    4
     Taxonomic and Mapping Units---	    6
          Alluvial Soils	    6
          Altered Soils	    6
          Blackhoof Series	    7
          Duluth Series	    8
          Duluth Variant	   12
          Busier Series	   15
          Lake Beaches	   17
          Organic Soils	   19
          Hemadji Series	   20
          Newson Series	   22
          Omega Series	—   24-
Investigation Procedures-	   27

-------

-------
                                                       1.
                             ABSTRACT
     A soil survey of about 7,000 acres of land in Windepejre
Township, Pine County, Minnesota was conducted 14- September
to 6 November 1981.  The survey area comprises lands sur-
rounding Island, Passenger, Rush, and Sturgeon Lakes.  A
soil survey consists of the following parts:  (1) identi-
fication and classification of soils of the area, (2) a map
showing the location of the different kinds of soil, and
(3) interpretations about the response of the different
kinds of soil to use and management.

     Ten major kinds of soil were identified and classified
on the basis of properties in the upper 60 inches of soil.
These comprise 3 that formed in loamy glacial till, 3 that
formed in sandy glacial outwash, 1 that formed in a mantle
of glacial outwash and underlying glacial till, organic
soils, alluvial soils and s.bila.-ohv-lake, beaches.

     The 3 kinds of soil that formed in till and the 3 kinds
that formed in outwash are distinguished one from another in
the basis of properties associated with degree of wetness.
Soils that formed in till are the well and moderately well
drained Duluth series, the somewhat poorly and poorly drained
Dusler series, and the very poorly drained Blackhoof series.
Soils that formed in glacial outwash are the somewhat exces-
sively drained Omega series, the somewhat poorly drained
Nemadji series, and the poorly and very poorly drained Newson
series.  Three phases of both the Duluth and Omega series
are recognized on the basis of slope.

     The three dominant soils in the'survey area are the
Duluth and Omega series and organic soils.  The Duluth series
and its wetter associates are on most all land adjacent to
Island Lake and on land adjacent the northern and eastern
parts of Sturgeon Lake.  The Omega series and its wetter
associates are dominant on land adjacent to Passenger and
Rush Lakes and on land adjacent to the southern and south-
western parts of Sturgeon Lake.  Organic soils are in small
to large areas throughout the survey area, but the largest
single area of such soils begins not too far from the central
part of the west shore of Sturgeon Lake.

      The National  Cooperative  Soil Survey has  rated the  soils
 in regards  to limitations  for  conventional septic  tank
 absorption  fields  among  other  uses.   The  ratings are  slight,
 moderate,  and severe.   The Duluth,  Dusler,  and  Blackhoof
 series are  rated  as  severe because of  low rates  of  percola-
 tion or the presence  of  a  seasonal high water  table or both.
 The Omega,  Nemadji,  and  Newson series  likewise  are  rated as
 severe because  of  being  a  poor filter  of  sewage  effluent or
 for having  a seasonal  high water table  or both.   Organic
 soils  are rated as  severe  because of a  seasonal  high  water
 table.

                      B-l-1

-------
                       DESCRIPTION OF SOILS
     Important features of taxonomic and map units are de-
scribed here.  Taxonomic units are the basic kinds of soil
that were identified in the survey area, whereas map units
are bodies of soil that are delineated on the maps.

     The following items are described.

          Taxonomic Units

               Landscape setting and some interpretations
               Associated soils
               Seasonal high water
               Description of a representative pedon
               Range in characteristics

          Map Units

               Setting
               Inclusions

     The permeability class for each taxonomic unit is given
in the first paragraph.  This class is based on the most re-
strictive horizon within a depth of 60 inches.  Estimates of
the permeability of each horizon are in the detailed pedon
description.  Rates and class names follow:
               Inches/hour

                <0.06
                 0.06- 0.20
                 0.20- 0.60
                 0.60- 2.00
                 2.00- 6.00
                 6.00-20.00
Class name

 very slow
 slow
 moderately slow
 moderate
 moderately rapid
 rapid
     The pattern of soils in most of the survey area is very
complex.  Thus, even at the rather large map scale of this
survey, small area of different kinds of soil are included
in many of the delineations of each map unit.

     Soils in this survey area were identified and mapped on
the basis of properties of the upper 60 inches of the soil.
Statements here, thus, only refer to the nature of the soil
from the surface to a depth of 60 inches.

     If the meaning of some terms used in this report is not
known, refer to the glossary of a modern so.il survey report,
for example, Carlton County, Minnesota.

     An identification legend with the map units arranged
numerically by map symbol is attached to the soil map.  An

                       B-l-2

-------
                                                       3.
identification legend with the map units arranged alphabet-
ically follows.

                      B-l-3

-------
                 Identification Legend
                       Map Units
Map Symbol
 1002
 1016
 6U
 504B
 504.C
 504.E
 3350B

 1350C

 502
 1032
 995
 186
 274
 188B
 188C
 188E
               Name
Alluvial soils
Altered soils
Blackhoof muck
Duluth loan, 1 to 4- percent slopes
Duluth loam, 4 to 15 percent slopes
Duluth loam, 15 to 60 percent slopes
Duluth variant loamy fine sand,
1 to 4. percent slopes
Duluth variant loamy fine sand,
4 to 15 percent slopes
Dusler loam
Lake beaches
Organic soils
Nemadji loamy sand
Newson mucky sandy loam
Omega loamy sand, Oto 5 percent slopes
Omega loamy sand, 5 to 20 percent slopes
Omega loamy sand, 20 to 60 percent slopes
                  B-l-4

-------
Conventional and Special Features
 +

""w"
     Section corners

     Dams and associated reservior

     Gravel and sand pits

     Perennial drainage way

     Intermittent drainage way

     End of drainage way

     Unnamed lakes and ponds

     Soil delineations and map unit symbols

     Soil sample site

     Small area, 1/8 to 1/2 acre, of poorly
     drained or wetter soils in delineations
     of better drained soils
       B-l-5

-------
                    Taxonomic  and  Mapping Units
                           Alluvial Soils
      Alluvial  soils  consist  of  poorly  to  moderately well
 drained  sandy  and  loamy  soils that  formed in  alluvium  on
 flood plains.   They  have moderately slow  to rapid  perme-
 ability.   These soils  typically are flooded one  or more
 times each year.

      Alluvial  soils  are  primarily associated  with  soils of
 the  Duluth and Omega series, which  are on bluffs adjacent to
 the  flood  plains.  The Duluth series formed in glacial till
 and  Omega  soils formed in glacial outwash.  Organic soils are
 associated with Alluvial soils  in a few places.  No descrip-
 tion of  a  pedon of Alluvial  soils is given because of  their
 limited  extent, great  variability,  and insignificance  to the
 purpose  of this soil survey.

      1_002  A11 uvia 1 soi 1 s^  ml x e d.  This map unit  has linear
 slopes with gradient of  less than 1  percent on flood plains,
 delineations of this unit  primarily are elongate in shape and
 are  about  2 to 20  acres  in size.  Areas of these soils are in
 pasture  or forest.

      Small areas of  organic  soils are  included in  some delin-
 eations  of this map  unit.
                          Altered  Soils
      Areas where the soils have been altered by cutting and
 filling are the basic components of this unit.  Most areas
 are on glacial moraines.  Thus, most areas resulting from
 cutting consist of loamy material as in the B and C horizons
 of soils such as Duluth.  Further, most areas resulting from
 filling consist of similar material.  The internal drainage
 of these soils mostly ranges from somewhat poor to moderate-
 ly well drained.  Permeability is mostly slow.

     1016 Altered soils.  Only one map unit of altered soils
is used in this survey.  Areas of altered soils along roads,
highways, and around houses and cabins are not included in
this map unit.  Instead they are considered as normal inclu-
sions in other appropriate units where delineations of them
include such cultural features.  This map unit of altered
soils consists mostly of discrete, cut and filled areas away
from those cultural features except in on place where exten-

                       B-l-6

-------
 sive cutting and filling has occurred along a county high-
 way.
                          Blackhoof Series
      The Blackhoof series consists of nearly level, very
 poorly drained, slowly and very slowly permeable soils that
 formed in a thin mantle of organic soil material and in un-
 derlying loamy glacial till or old local aluvium or both.
 These soils have concave and linear slopes and are in de-
 pressions and drainage ways on glacial moraines.

      The Blackhoof series primarily is associated with the
 Busier and Duluth series and organic soils.  This series is
 wetter and has colors of low chroma to greater depth than
 the Busier and Duluth series.  This series has a thinner
 mantle of organic soil material than Organic soils.

      The seasonal high water table in the Blackhoof series
 commonly begins within one foot of the surface throughout
 most of the year.  Water is on the surface in most of the
 spring and autumn months.

      A description of a representative pedon (S-81-MN-58-9-
 samples 1 to 5) of the Blackhoof series in the mapping unit
 of Blackhoof muck (map symbol 614-) which is located in the
 upper part of a drainage way about 530 feet east and 370
 feet south of the northwest corner of the southwest i of
 section 10, R. 19 W.,T. 45 N. is in the following paragraphs.
 This pedon was described and sampled 5 November 1981.  It is
 located in a thicket of alder with a ground cover of grasses
 and sedges.  A delineation of Duluth loam, 4. to 15 percent
 slopes is adjacent to this delineation of Blackhoof muck.
 The water table was at the surface.

      Oa--8 to 0 inches; black (1OYR a/1)'broken face and
 rubbed, sapric material (muck); moderate very fine and fine
 granular structure; very friable,  slightly sticky; many very
 fine and fine and few medium and coarse roots; pH 5.0;
 moderate permeability; clear smooth boundary.

      A11(A1}* --0 to 5 inches; black (N 2/0) mucky silt loam;
 moderate very fine and fine granular- structure; very friable,
 slightly sticky; common very fine  and fine roots; pH 5.0;
 moderate permeability; abrupt smooth boundary.

      A12(A2)-- 5 to 8 inches; black (10YR 2/1) silt loam;
 massive; firm, slightly sticky; few very fine roots; pH 5.0;
 slow permeability; abrupt smooth boundary.

^Recently revised designations for  horizons are given in this
 part of descriptions if they differ from former designations.
                       B-l-7

-------
     B21g(Bgwl)--8 to 25 inches; dark gray (51 4/1)  silty
clay loam; many medium and large olive brown (2.51 4/4.)
mottles throughout and common fine prominent dark brown
(7.5IR 4/4) mottles mostly in the lower part; massive; very
firm, slightly sticky; pH 7.0; very slow permeability; dif-
fuse smooth boundary.

     B22g(Bgw2)-- 25 to 48 inches; gray (51 5/1) silt loam
near loam; many fine distinct light olive brown (2.5Y 5/4),
common medium distinct greenish gray (5G 5/1) and few fine
prominent yellowish red.(5YR 4/6) mottles; massive;  firm,
slightly sticky; pH 7.5; slow permeability.

     The 0 horizon ranges from 4 to 16 inches in thickness.
The A horizon is 3 to 9 inches thick, and is loam, silt loam,
clay loam, or silty clay loam.  The B horizon is silt loam,
loam, silty clay loam, or clay loam.

     614 Blackhoof muck.  This map unit is in depressions and
drainageways on glacial moraines.  It has concave and linear
slopes with gradient 0 .to 1 percent.  Delineations of this
soil which encompass drainageways commonly are narrow and
enlongated in shape and mostly.range from 2 .to 10 acres in
size.  Delineations in depression commonly are circular in
shape and mostly range from 2 to.8 acres in size.  Most areas
of these soils are in pasture or forest.

     Soils included in delineations .of this map unit have
similar interpretations.  Common included soils are  Organic
soils, and soils that are similar to the Blackhoof series
except that they lack the layer of organic soil material.
Also, a few included soils are sandy in so.me to all parts of
the A horizon and B horizon.  Further, small areas of Newson
soils are included in a few delineations.
                          Duluth Series
     The Duluth series consists of gently undulating to very
steep, moderately well and well drained, moderately slow and
slowly permeable soils that formed mostly in loamy calcareous
glacial till on glacial moraines.  They mostly have convex
slopes, but they have linear or concave slopes on the lower
parts of some steep and very steep slopes.

     The Duluth series is primarily associated with the Black-
hoof and Dusler series,, and Organic soils.  The Duluth series
lacks a seasonal high water table within depths of 5 feet,
whereas these associated soils have a seasonal high water
table beginning at depths of 4 feet or less.  Also, the Duluth
series lacks mottles in the B horizon, whereas the Blackhoof
and Dusler series have mottles in the B horizon.  The Duluth
series is similar to Duluth variant.  The Duluth series form-

                      B-l-8

-------
                                                        9.
ed either entirely in till or in a thin mantle of outwash and
in underlying till, whereas the Duluth variant formed in a
mantle of sandy outwash that is 20 to 40 inches in thickness
and in underlying till.

     The Duluth series typically lacks a seasonal high water
table within depths of 5 feet.  However, some soils of the
Duluth series are saturated in some horizons for short
periods of time during periods of above normal rainfall.

     Since the Duluth series is the dominant soil in the area,
descriptions of two pedons are presented.  The first (S-81-KN-
58-8-samples 1 to 7) is in a delineation of Duluth loam, 1 to
4 percent slopes (map symbol 504B) , located about 800 feet
east and 1,050 feet south of the northwest corner of the south-
west i, section 10, R. 19 W., T. 45 N.  It has a convex slope
of about 2 percent and is about 100 feet from the boundary
of a delineation of Duluth loam, 15 to 60 percent slopes (map
symbol 504-E) on the bluffs adjacent to Sturgeon Lake.  It is
in an old meadow field.  It was described and sampled 5 Nov-
ember 1981.  It was very moist in the upper 30 inches and
moist below.

     Ap—0 to 6 inches; dark brown (7.5YR 3/2) loam; moderate
fine and medium granular structure; friable; many very fine
and fine roots; about 2 percent coarse fragments; pH 6.5;
moderate permeability; abrupt .smooth boundary.

     A2(E)—6 to 10 inches; brown (7.5YR 5/2) loam; massive
in some parts and weak thick platy structure in other parts;
firm, fractures abruptly under pressure; common very fine and
fine roots; about 2 percent coarse fragments; pH 6.5; slovf
permeability; abrupt wavy boundary.

     B&A(B/E)--10 to 13 inches; B part comprising about 85
percent is reddish brown (2.5YR 4/4)  clay loam;  A part com-
prising about 15 percent as tongues and interfingers is brown
I7.5YR 5/2) loam; weak fine and medium prismatic structure
parting to moderate fine and medium subangular blocky; very
firm, slightly sticky; few thin clay films on faces of second-
ary peds; few very fine and fine roots mostly on faces of
peds; about 2 percent coarse fragments;  pH 5.0;  moderately
slow permeability; clear smooth boundary.

     B21t(Bt1)—13 to 22 inches; reddish brown (2.5YR 4/4)
clay loam; weak fine and medium prismatic structure parting
to moderate fine and medium angular blocky; firm, sticky;
common thin and medium clay films on faces of peds; common
thin coatings of A2 material on faces of prisms; few fine
roots; about 2 percent coarse fragments; pH 4«5; moderately
slow permeability; diffuse smooth boundary.

     B22t(Bt2)--22 to 36 inches; reddish brown (2.5YR 4/4)
loam near clay loam; moderate fine angular blocky structure;
firm, sticky; common thin clay films  on faces of peds; few
                          B-l-9

-------
                                                      10.
fine and medium roots; about 2 percent coarse fragment;
pH4»5; moderately slow permeability; diffuse smooth boundary,

     B3t(BCt)--36 to 64 inches; reddish brown (2.5YR 4/4)
loam; moderate fine angular blocky structure; firm, slightly
sticky; few thin clay films on faces of peds; few thin black
coatings on faces of peds; few very fine roots; about 2 per-
cent coarse fragments; pH 7.5; moderately slow permeability;
clear smooth boundary.

     C--64 to 76 inches; reddish brown (5YR 4/3) loam; weak
thin to thick platy structure; firm, slightly sticky; common
very fine and fine masses of CaCO-a; about 2 percent coarse
fragments; pH 7.8; slow permeability.

     The second pedon (S-81-MN-58-10-samples 1 to 6) is in a
delineation of Duluth loam, 4 to 15 percent slopes (map
symbol 504C) located about 330 feet east and 460 feet south
of the northwest corner of section 3, R. 19., T. 45 N.  It
has a convex slope of about 8 percent.  It is about 200 feet
from the boundary of a delineation of Duluth loam, 15 to 60
percent slopes (map symbol 504E) on the bluffs adjacent to
Island Lake.  It is under a plantation of white spruce.  It
was described and sampled 5 November 1981.  It was very
moist in the upper 36 inches, and slightly moist below.

     Ap--0 to 6 inches; dark brown (7.5YR 3/2) to brown (7.5
YR 4/2) loam; moderate medium granular structure; friable;
common very fine and fine and few medium and coarse roots;
about 2 percent coarse fragments; pH 6.5; moderate permeabil-
ity; abrupt smooth boundary.

     B&A(B/E)--6 to 9 inches; B part comprising about 85 per-
cent is reddish brown (2.5YR 4/4) clay loam; A part com-
prising about 15 percent as tongues and interfingers is
reddish brown (5YR 5/3) sandy loam; moderate fine and medium
prismatic structure parting to moderate fine and medium sub-
angular blocky; firm, slightly sticky; few thin clay films
on faces of secondary peds; common fine and medium roots
mostly on faces of peds; about 2 percent coarse fragments;
pH 6.0; moderately slow permeability; clear wavy boundary.

     B2H(Bt1)--9 to 18 inches; reddish brown (2.5YR 4/4)
clay loam; moderate medium prismatic structure parting to
moderate fine and medium angular blocky; firm, slightly
sticky; many thin and medium clay films on faces of peds;
few thin coatings of A2 material on faces of peds; few fine
and medium roots; about 2 percent coarse fragments; pH 5.5;
moderately slow permeability; gradual smooth boundary.

     B22t(Bt2)--18 to 38 inches; reddish brown (5YR 4/4)
light clay loam; moderate medium and coarse angular blocky
structure parting to moderate very fine angular blocky;
firm slightly sticky; common thin clay films on faces of
peds; about 2 percent coarse fragments; pH 5.5; moderately

                          B-l-10

-------
                                                      11.
slow permeability; diffuse smooth boundary.

     B3(BC)--38 to 60 inches; reddish brown (2.5YR 4/4)
loam; weak very fine angular blocky structure; firm, slight-
ly sticky; few thin clay films on faces of peds; few thin
black coatings on faces of peds; few fine roots; about 2
percent coarse fragments; pH 7.5; moderately slow perme-
bility; sampled at depths of 38 to 49 and 49 to 60 inches.

     The thickness of solum and depth to free carbonates
ranges from 40 to 80 inches.  The content of coarse frag-
ments ranges from 1 to 8 percent.  The A horizon is fine
sandy loam, sandy loam, loam, or silt loam.  The B horizon
has hue of 2.5IR or 5IR and has 18 to 35 percent clay.  It
is loam or clay loam.  The C horizon is loam or clay loam
and has weak platy or angular blocky structure.

     504B Duluth loam, 1 to 4 percent slopes.  This map
unit mostly has convex slopes and is on glacial moraines.
Delineations of this map unit are variable in size and shape.
They range from as small as one acre to as large as 100 acres
in size.  In some places they are circular and other places
elongated.  This map unit commonly is on the higher parts of
the landscape.  Most areas of these soils are in pasture and
forest, but significant areas of them are used as sites for
homes or cabins.  Duluth soils in this map unit commonly
have thicker sola than they do in the other two map units.

     Small areas of Blackhoof and Busier series are included
in some delineations of this map unit.  Host areas of these
kinds of included soils are indicated by the symbol for wet
spots and drainage ways.  Small areas of the Duluth variant
and soils similar to Duluth soils except for having sandy A
horizons, also, are included in some delineations of this map
unit.  Further, soils that are similar to the Duluth series
except for having more clay in the B horizon or C horizon or
both are included in a few delineations of this map unit.
Small areas with slopes steeper than 4 percent are included
in a few places.

     504C Duluth loam. 4 to 15 percent slopes.  This map
unit mostly has convex and linear slopes on glacial moraines.
Linear slopes primarily are on the lower lying parts of de-
lineations of this map unit.  Delineations primarily are
rather narrow and elongated, and commonly range from 2 to 20
acres in size.  They primarily are on slopes adjacent to
lower lying wetter soils.  Most areas of these soils are in
forest or pasture, but significant areas of them are used as
sites for cabins and homes.  Duluth soils in this map unit
commonly have sola that are intermediate in the range of
thickness.

     Small areas of Blackhoof and Dusler series are included
in a few delineations of this map unit.  Most of these in-
clusions are indicated by the symbol for wet spots and drain-
                         B-1-11

-------
                                                      12.
age ways.  Small areas of Duluth variant and soils similar
to Duluth except for having sandy A horizons and upper B
horizons or only sandy A horizons are included in a few de-
lineations.  Further, soils that are similar to the Duluth
series except for having more clay in the B horizon or C
horizon or both are included in a few delineations of this
map unit.  Small areas with slopes of less than 4. percent
and more than 15 percent are included in a few places.

     504.E Duluth loam. 15 to 60 percent slopes.  This map
unit has convex, linear, and concave slopes.  Linear and con-
cave slopes are on the lower lying parts of delineations of
this map unit.  Delineations primarily are rather narrow and
elongated and commonly range from 5 to 50 acres in size.
This map unit primarily is on bluffs adjacent to Island and
Sturgeon Lakes.  Most areas of these soils are in forest,
but a few are in pasture.  Duluth soils in this map unit
commonly have the shallower range in thickness of sola.

     A few small areas of wetter soils are included in a few
delineations of this unit.  Such soils are mostly in drain-
age ways.  Small areas of the Duluth variant and soils
similar to the Duluth series except for having sandy A hor-
izons and upper B horizons or sandy A horizons only are in-
cluded in a few delineations.  Further, soils that are
similar to the Duluth series except for having more clay in
the B horizon or C horizon or both are included in a few
delineations.  Small areas with slopes of less than 15 per-
cent and more than 60 percent are included in a few places.


                          Duluth Variant
     The Duluth variant soils consist of gently sloping and
sloping, moderately well and well drained, moderately slow
and slowly permeable soils that formed in a 20 to 4.0-inch
thick mantle of sandy outwash and in underlying loamy cal-
careous glacial till on glacial moraines.  These soils most-
ly have convex and linear slopes.

     Soils here identified as Duluth variant have not yet
been recognized as a named soil series by the Cooperative
Soil Survey of Minnesota.  They have unique properties and
are significant enough in extent to recognize as a discrete
kind of soil in this survey.  They primarily occur in a
transition zone between soils such as the Duluth series
which formed in till in the eastern part of the survey area
and soils such as the Omega series which formed in outwash
in the western part of the survey area.  Duluth variant
soils have sandy horizons extending from the surface to
depths of 20 to 4-0 inches, whereas the Duluth series formed
in glacial till and has loamy upper horizons.  Duluth
variant soils have loamy B horizons beginning within depths
of 20 to 4-0 inches, whereas the Omega series formed in
                         B-l-12

-------
                                                       13.
glacial outwash and is sandy throughout.

     The Duluth variant soils typically lack  a seasonal
high water table within depths of 5 feet.  However, some of
the Duluth variant soils are saturated in the lower part of
the sandy mantle or in the upper part of the soil in glacial
till for short periods of time during periods of above normal
rainfall.

     A description of a representative pedon (S-81 -MN-58-2-
samples 1 to 7) in a large delineation of the mapping unit
Duluth variant loamy fine sand, 1 to 4- percent slopes (map
symbol 1350B) which is located near the summit of a knoll
with a convex slope of 2 percent on a glacial moraine about
2,44.0 feet west and 2,380 feet south of the northeast corner
of section 17, R. 19 W., T. 45 N. is in the following para-
graph.  The delineation with this pedon primarily is bounded
by Omega soils to the west and Duluth and Dusler soils to
the east.  It is in an old field on the Y.M.C.A. property.
This pedon was described and sampled 3 November 1981.  It
was moist throughout.

     Ap--0 to 9 inches; dark brown (7.5YR 3/2) loamy fine
sand; weak fine and medium granular structure; very friable,
non-sticky; many very fine and fine roots; pH 6.5; rapid
permeability; abrupt smooth boundary.

     B21(Bwl)--9 to 20 inches; dark reddish brown (5YR 3/4)
loamy fine sand; weak fine subangular blocky structure;
very friable; common very fine and fine roots; pH 6.0;
rapid permeability; clear smooth boundary.

     B22(Bw2)--20 to 25 inches; dark reddish brown (5YR 3/4)
loamy sand; massive; very friable; common very fine and fine
roots; about 5 percent gravel; pH 6.0; rapid permeability;
abrupt smooth boundary.

     11B&A(2B/E)--25 to 31 inches; B part comprising about
85 percent is yellowish red (5YR 4/6) clay loam; A part com-
prising about 15 percent as tongues and interfingers is
reddish brown (5YR 5/3) sandy loam and loamy sand; weak fine
and medium prismatic structure parting to moderate medium
subangular blocky; firm; few fine roots on faces of peds ;
about 2 percent coarse fragments; pH 5.5; moderately slow
permeability; gradual smooth boundary.
     11B21t(2Bt1)--31 to 41 inches; reddish brown (2.5YR
clay loam; few fine distinct yellowish red (5YR 5/6) mottles;
weak medium prismatic structure parting to moderate fine and
medium subangular blocky; firm; common thin clay films and
few thin to thick reddish gray (5YR 5/2) coatings of A2
material on faces of peds; few fine dark colored concretions;
few fine roots mostly on faces of peds; about 5 percent
coarse fragments; pH 5.5; moderately slow permeability;
diffuse boundary.
                        B-1-13

-------
                                                      u.
     11B22t(2Bt2)--41 to 52 inches; reddish brown (2.5YR
-4/4.) clay loam; weak fine and medium angular blocky struc-
ture; firm; few thin clay films on faces of peds; irregular
mass of sandy loam in lower part; about 5 percent coarse
fragments; pH 6.5; moderately slow permeability; diffuse
boundary.

     11B3(2BC)--52 to 60 inches; dark reddish brown (2.5YR
3/4-) clay loam near loam; weak very fine and fine angular
blocky structure; firm; few thin clay films on faces of
peds; about 5 percent coarse fragments; pH 7.0; slow per-
meability.

     The thickness of solum ranges from 50 to 80 inches.
The mantle of outwash is 20 to 40 inches thick.  That
mantle lacks or has as much as 20 percent of coarse frag-
ments.  These fragments are more common in the lower part
of the mantle.  Horizons in glacial till have 1 to 10 per-
cent of coarse fragments.  Horizons in the mantle of out-
wash typically have texture of fine sand, sand, loamy fine
sand, or loamy sand.  However, the A horizon in some pedons
is fine sandy loam or sandy loam.  The part of the B hori-
zon in the sandy mantle has hue of 7.5YR or 5YR.  The B and
C horizons in glacial till have hue of 2.5YR or 5YR and are
loam or clay loam.  Those horizons have 18 to 35 percent
clay.

     1350B Duluth variant loamy fine sand, 1 to 4. percent
slpjpes,.  This map unit mostly has convex slopes, but some
parts of it has linear or concave slopes.  This unit is on
glacial moraines.  Most delineations of this unit are elong-
ate in shape and typically ar 4- to 100 acres in size.  Most
areas of these soils are in forest, but few are in pasture
and sites for homes and cabins.  The Duluth variant soils
in this map unit have the full range of properties de-
scribed for that soil.

     Small areas of the Duluth and Omega'series are included
in some delineations.  Also, small areas of soils that are
wetter than Duluth variant soils are in some delineations.
Most areas of such soils are shown by the symbols for wet
spots and drainage ways.  Further, a few small areas of
soils with sandy loam or fine sandy loam texture in the up-
per part of the B horizon are included.  Small areas with
slopes of more than k percent are included in a few places.

     1350C Duluth variant loamy fine sand, 4. to 15 percent
slopes.  This map unit mostly has convex slopes.  However,
some parts of it has linear and concave slopes, and these
kinds of slopes are mostly on the lower lying parts of it.
This map unit is on glacial moraines.  Some delineations
are circular in shape and are on knolls typically ranging
from 2 to 10 acres in size.  Other delineations of it are
elongate and typically range from 5 to 20 acres in size.
Most areas of these soils are in forest or pasture, but a

                         B-l-14

-------
                                                      15.
few areas are used as sites for cabins and homes.  The
Duluth variant soils in this map unit have the full range
of properties described for that soil.

     Small areas of the Duluth and Omega series are in-
cluded in a few delineations.  Also, a few small areas of
soils with sandy loam or fine sandy loam texture in the
upper part of the B horizon are included.  Small areas with
slopes of less than 4 percent or more than 15 percent are
included in a few places.
                          Dusler Series
     The Dusler series consists of nearly level, somewhat
poorly and poorly drained, slowly permeable soils that form-
ed mostly in loamy calcareous glacial till.  These soils
have slightly convex to slightly concave slopes on glacial
moraines.

      The Dusler series primarily is associated with the
Blackhoof and Duluth series and Organic soils.  The Dusler
series is wetter than the Duluth series, and it has mottles
in the B horizon which are lacking in the Duluth series.  The
Dusler series is not as wet as the Blackhoof series and
Organic soils.

     The seasonal high water table in the Dusler series com-
monly begins within depths of 1 to 4 feet during the period
of October to June.  It commonly is at greater depths in
other times of the year.

     A description of a representative pedon (S-81-MN-58-1-
samples 1 to 6) of the Dusler series in the map unit of Dusler
loam (map symbol 502) located on a linear slope of about 0.5
percent 1,520 feet west and 2,380 feet south of the northeast
corner of section 17, R. 19 W., T. 4-5 N. is in the following
paragraphs.  This pedon is about 500 feet from the shore of
Sturgeon Lake.  The delineation in which this pedon occurs
primarily is bounded by Duluth, Duluth variant, and Organic
soils.  This pedon is in a deciduous-coniferous forest on the
Y.M.C.A. property.  It was described and sampled on 3 November
1981.  Free water began at depths of about 5 inches.

     A1(A)--0 to 6 inches; very dark gray (10YR 3/1) loam;
moderate fine and medium granular structure; slightly sticky;
many fine and medium and few large roots; about 2 percent
coarse fragments; pH 6.0; moderate permeability; clear smooth
boundary.

     A2(E)--6 to 12 inches; dark grayish brown (10YR 4Y2)
loam; few fine prominent yellowish red (5YR 4/6) mottles;
moderate medium granular structure; slightly sticky; common
fine and few large roots; about 2 percent coarse fragments;
                             B-1-15

-------
                                                      16.
pH 6.0; moderate permeability; clear smooth boundary.

     B&A(B/E)--12 to 17 inches; B part comprising about 80
percent is brown (7.SYR 4/4) heavy loam with common fine
distinct yellowish red SIR A/6) mottles; A part comprising
about 20 percent as tongues and interfingers is brown
(7.5YR 5/2) loam with few fine distinct gray (5YR 6/1)
mottles; weak fine and medium prismatic structure parting to
weak medium and coarse subangular blocky; very firm, sticky;
few thin clay fil.ms on faces of secondary peds; common fine
roots mostly on faces of peds; about 2 percent coarse frag-
ments; horizon not yet saturated; pH 5.5; slow permeability;
clear wavy boundary.

     B21t(Bt1)—17 to 28 inches; reddish brown (5YR 4/4) clay
loam; weak fine and medium prismatic structure parting to
moderate fine and medium subangular blocky; sticky; many thin
and medium reddish gray (5YR 5/2) and dark reddish gray (5YR
4/2) clay films and coatings on faces of peds; few fine roots
mostly on faces of peds; about 2 percent coarse fragments;
pH 5.0; moderately slow permeability; gradual boundary.

     B22t(Bt2)--28 to 42 inches; dark reddish brown (5YR 3/4)
clay loam near loam; weak fine and medium angular blocky
structure; sticky; few thin clay films on faces of peds; few
fine roots mostly on faces of peds; about 2 percent coarse
fragments; p H 6.5; moderately slow permeability; diffuse
boundary.

     B3{BC)--42 to 60 inches; reddish brown (5YR 4/3 heavy
loam; weak very fine and fine angular blocky structure;
slightly sticky; very few fine roots; about 2 percent coarse
fragments; pH 7.5; slow permeability.

     The thickness of solum ranges from 50 to 70 inches. The
content of coarse fragments typically ranges from 1 to 8 per-
cent, but fragments are lacking in the upper part of some
pedons.  The A horizon is sandy loam, fine sandy loam, loam,
or silt loam.  The B horizon primarily has a matrix with hue
of 2.5YR or 5YR.  Mottles in the upper part of the B horizon
range from few to many.  The B horizon has 18 to 35 percent
clay.

     502 Dusler loam.  This map unit typically has linear or
concave slopes, but it has slightly convex slopes in a few
places.  Slope gradient ranges from 0 to 2 percent.  These
soils are on  glacial moraines.  Delineations of the map
unit are variable in size and shape.  They range from as
small as about one acre to as large as about 40 acres.  The
range in shape from elongate to circular.  Most areas of
these soils are pasture or forest.  Dusler soils in this map
unit have the full range in properties described here for the
series.
                         B-l-16

-------
                                                       17.
      Small areas of Blackhoof series and Organic soils are
 included in some  delineations.  Most of thsee inclusions are
 indicated by the symbol for wet spots and drainage ways.
 Small areas of Duluth soils are included in some delineations,
 These are on small low knolls.  Small areas of soils that
 are similar to Busier except for having sandy textures in the
 A horizon or upper part of the B horizon or both, also are
 included in a few delineations.  Small areas of Nemadji soils
 are included in a few delineations.
                            Lake Beaches
      Lake beaches consist of nearly level,  very poorly to
 moderately well drained,  moderately to rapidly permeable
 soils that formed mostly  in recent to rather old sandy beach
 deposits adjacent to lakes.  The deposits in which these
 soils formed result from  the action of wind and ice.   The
 higher lying parts of these soils may be a  result of  once
 higher lake levels.
     Lake beaches are bounded by soils of Duluth and Omega
series on their upslope side.  These soils are on bluffs
around the lakes among other places.  They are bounded by
water on their down-slope side.  The part of these soils that
are adjacent to lakes have free water beginning at or near
the surface throughout the year.  Where Lake beaches border
Duluth and Omega soils, they have a water table beginning
within 1 to 3 feet of the surface during the wetter parts
of the year.

     No soil series have yet been defined by the Minnesota
Cooperative Soil Survey to comprise soils here called Lake
beaches.  Actually two or three soil series would be needed
to adequately define the soils in Lake beaches in this
survey area.  Since no series exist for these soils, the
name Lake beaches is used for them in this report.

     An example of a pedon (S-81-MN-58-5-samples 1 to 6) in
a delineation Lake beaches (map symbol 1032) located near
the west shore of Passenger Lake about 990 feet east and
2,510 feet north of the center of section 32, R. 19 W., T. 45
N. is in the following paragraphs.  This pedon has a concave
slope with gradient of about & percent.  It is about 50 feet
east of the beginning of a delineation of Omega loamy sand,
20 to 60 percent slopes, which is on the bluffs around the
lake.  It is about 100 feet west of the border of that lake
and is about 3 feet above the level of the lake.  A decidu-
ous-coniferous forest is at the site.  The pedon was describ-
ed and sampled 4 November 1981.  The water table began at

                           B-l-17

-------
                                                      18.
about 30 inches.  The soil was moist above that depth.

     Oa--2 to 0 inches; black (5YR 2/1)  sapric material
(muck); moderate very fine and fine granular structure; very
friable; many very fine and fine and many medium and coarse
roots; many particles of sand; pH 4.5; moderate.permeability;
abrupt smooth boundary.

     A1(A)--0 to 3 inches; very dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2)
sandy loamy; weak fine and medium granular structure; very
friable; many very fine and fine and common medium and coarse
roots; pH 4..5; moderate permeability; clear smooth boundary.

     B2(Bw)--3 to 21 inches; brown (7.SIR 5/2 to 5/4) sand;
few fine and medium distinct yellowish red (5YR 4/8) mottles;
single grained; loose; few medium and coarse roots; pH 6.0;
rapid permeability; clear smooth boundary.

     C1--21 to 29 inches; stratified brown (7YR 5/2) and very
dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2) sand and loamy sand; massive;
friable in some parts and very friable in other parts; few
small masses and strata of black (1OYR 2/1) sapric and hemic
materials; pH 6.0; moderately rapid permeability; gradual
smooth boundary.

     C2--29 to 36 inches; dark brown (7.5YR 4/2) sand; few
fine and medium distinct gray (N 5/0) mottles; single grained;
loose; few pebbles in some parts; pH 4.5; rapid permeability;
clear smooth boundary.

     C3--36 to 60 inches; dark gray (5YR 4/1) stratified sand,
coarse sand, and gravelly and very gravelly sand and coarse
sand; few fine and medium distinct gray (N 5/0) mottles;
single grained; loose; gravel mostly 0.2 to 1.0 cm; pH 6.0;
rapid permeability.

      The  content  of gravel  ranges from 0 to 35 percent.   The
 color  in  these soils below  the A horizon has hue from 5Y  to
 5YR, value'of  4 to 6 and chroma of  1 to 4.  The depth to
 horizons  with  mottles ranges from 0 to 30 inches.  The A  hori-
 zon ranges from sands to sandy loams with or without gravel.
 Textures  below the A horizon are mostly sands or loamy sands
 with or without gravel.  Textures commonly are stratified
 within the limits  of a pedon, but some pedons lack such
 stratification.

      1032 Lake beaches.  Delineations of this map unit are
 narrow and elongated and typically range from 1 to 20 acres
 in size.  These soils primarily are adjacent to Passenger and
 Sturgeon Lakes, but small areas of them are adjacent to Island
 and Rush Lakes.  Most areas of these soils are forested or
 have shruby and herbaceous, wetland vegetation.  However,
 significant areas of these  soils are used as sites for cabins
 and homes.
                            B-l-18

-------
                                                      19.
     Lake "beaches that have glacial till beginning at shallow
depths are included in a few places.  Such inclusions pri-
marily are along Island Lake and along the eastern and north-
ern shore of Sturgeon Lake.
                          Organic Soils
     Organic soils consist of very poorly drained, nearly
level soils with slow to moderately rapid permeability.  They
formed in organic soil material, namely slightly to highly
decomposed remains of a variety of plants.  They primarily
are in small to large depressions on glacial moraines and
outwash plains.  Some of these depressions were formerly
lakes.  These soils are on floodplains in a few places.

     Organic soils primarily are associated both with soils
formed in glacial till, namely the Duluth, Dusler, and
Blackhoof series and soils formed in glacial outwash, namely
the Omega, Nemadji, and Newson series.  Of the above named
associated soils, Organic soils are most similar to the
Blackhoof anf Newson series.  However, they differ from those
series by having a thicker layer of organic soil material.

     The water table typically begins within depths of less
than one foot throughout the year.  Further, water commonly
is on the surface during several months of the growing
season.

     Different kinds of Organic soils were not mapped in this
survey because of lack of time to properly identify them and
because interpretive differences among the different kinds
were not important to the purpose of this soil survey.

     A description of a representative pedon (S-81-MN-58-3
samples 1 to 4-) of Organic soils in the largest bog in the
survey area is in the following paragraphs.  This pedon is in
the map unit of Organic soils (map symbol 995) and is located
about 800 feet north and 150 feet east of the southwest
corner of section 9» R* 19 W., T. 4-5 N.  This pedon has a
linear slope with gradient of less that i percent.  It is in
a coniferous forest dominated by black spruce and tamarack.
Moss-covered hummocks rise as much as 10 inches above the
common surface.  Mosses are the dominant ground cover.  This
pedon was described and sampled on 3 November 1981.  The
water table began about 10 inches below the surface.  This
bog has been partially drained.

     Oa--0 to 4 inches; very dark brown (10YR 2/2) broken
face and rubbed sapric material (muck); moderate very fine

                         B-l-19

-------
                                                      20.
granular structure; sticky; pH 4.0; moderately permeable;
clear smooth boundary.

     Oe1—4 to 22 inches; dark brown (7.5YR 3/2) matrix,
dark yellowish brown (1 OYR 4/4) fiber,  dark brown (7.5YR 3/2)
rubbed, hemic material (mucky peat); about 60 percent fiber,
about 40 percent after rubbing; massive; non sticky; mostly
herbaceous fiber with a trace of woody fragments; pH 4.0;
moderate permeability; gradual boundary.

     Oe2--22 to 65 inches.; very dark gray (10YR 3/1) matrix,
dark yellowish brown (1OYR 4/4; fiber,  dark brown (7.5YR 3/2)
rubbed, hemic material (mucky peat); about 40 percent fiber,
about 20 percent after rubbing; massive; slightly sticky;
mostly herbaceous fiber, trace of woody fragments; pH 5.5;
moderate permeability; clear boundary.

     Oe3—65 to 80 inches; very dark grayish brown (1OYR 3/2)
matrix, brown (1OYR 4/3) fiber, dark yellowish brown (10YR
3/4) rubbed, hemic material (mucky peat); about 60 percent
fiber, about 40 percent after rubbing;  massive; non sticky;  '
herbaceous fiber; pH 6.0; moderate permeability.

     Organic soils in this survey area have a wide range in
properties and several series could have been identified.
The thickness of organic soil material ranges from 16 inches
to more than 6 feet in thickness.  This material is mostly
sapric (muck) and hemic material (mucky peat), but a few have
some fibric material (peat).  This material is mostly derived
from herbaceous plants, but in some it is derived from woody
anc mossy plants.  The mineral soil material underlying the
organic soil material primarily is sandy or loamy.

     995 Organic soils.  This map unit has nearly level
slopes, gradient of less than 1 percent.  Individual deline-
ations of this map unit are variable in shape and size.  Some
are nearly circular in shape and others are narrow and elong-
ated.  They range from about one acre to more than 100 acres
in size.  Most areas of these soils are forested or are dori-
inated by herbaceous plants such as sedges.

     This map unit has few inclusions of other kinds of soil.
Included soils primarily are the Blackhoof and Newson soils,
and these primarily are near the boundary between Organic
soils and other kinds of soil.
                          Nemadji Series
     The Nemadji series consists of nearly level, somewhat
poorly drained, rapidly permeable soils that formed in sandy
glacial outwash.  These soils have slightly convex to slight-
                          B-l-20

-------
                                                      21.
ly concave slopes on glacial outwash plains.

     The Nemadji series primarily is associated with Newson
and Omega series and Organic soils.  The Nemadji series has
mottles in the B horizon, but the better drained Omega series
lacks mottles in that horizon.  The Nemadji series has higher
chroma in the B horizon than does the wetter'Newson series.
The Nemadji series lacks or has a thin layer of organic soil
material, whereas Organic soils have thicker layers of
organic soil material and are wetter.

     The seasonal high water table typically begins within
depths of 1.5 to 4 feet during the months of March to June.
It commonly is at greater depths during other parts of the
year except during periods of above normal rainfall.

     A description of a representative pedon (S-81-MN-58-6-
samples 1 to 7) of the Nemadji series in the map unit Nemadji
loamy sand (map symbol 186) located on a.  linear slope of a-
bout 0.5 percent about 2,050 feet west aud 1,190 feet north
of the southeast corner of section 21, R. 19 W. , T. 4-5 N. is
in the following paragraphs.  The delineation with this
pedon is bounded by delineations of the Omega and Newson
series and Organic soils.  This pedon is in a coniferous-
deciduous forest.  It was described and sampled 4 November
1981.  Free water began at depths of about 50 inches.  The
soil was moist above that depth.

      0-- 2 to 0 inches; very dark gray (10YR 3/1) highly
decomposed leaf litter, weak fine and medium granular
structure; very friable; many clean sand grains; many very
fine to medium roots; pH 4-.5; moderate permeability; abrupt
smooth boundary.

      A1(A)—0 to 4 inches; dark brown (7.5YR 3/2) loamy sand;
 weak very fine and fine granular structure; very friable;
 common clean sand particles; many very fine and fine and com-
 mon medium and large roots; pH 4.5; moderately rapid per-
 meability; abrupt smooth boundary,

     B21(Bw1)--4 to 11 inches; reddish brown (5YR 474.) sand;
few medium faint yellowish red (5YR 4-/6)  mottles; weak very
fine and fine granular structure; very friable; common medium
and large roots; pH 5.5; rapid permeability; clear smooth
boundary.

     B22(Bw2)--11 to 25 inches; yellowish red (5YR 4/8)  sand;
many fine and medium in upper part and large in lower part
distinct (5YR 5/3) mottles; massive; very friable; few fine
slightly consolidated masses of dark reddish brown (2.2YR
3/4-1; few medium and large roots; about 1  percent pebbles;
pH 5.5; rapid permeability; gradual smooth boundary.

     B23(Bw3)--25 to 42 inches; reddish brown (5YR 5/3)  sand;
many fine to coarse distinct yellowish red (5YR 4/8) mottles;
single grained; loose; about 1 percent pebbles; few medium
                              B-l-21

-------
                                                      22.
and large roots; pH 6.0; rapid permeability; gradual smooth
boundary.

     B3(BC)--42 to 55 inches; dark reddish brown (5Y.R 3/4)
sand; many medium and coarse faint reddish brown (5Y.R 5/3)
mottles; single grained ; loose; about 1 percent pebbles;
few very fine roots; pH 6.5; rapid permeability; gradual
smooth boundary.

     C--55 to 60 inches; dark grayish brown (5Y.H. 4-/2) sand;
single grained; loose; pH 6.5; rapid permeability.

     The sola range from 4-0 to 60 inches in thickness.  The
B and G horizons have a matrix with hue of 2.5YR or 5Y.R.  The
depth to horizons with mottles ranges from 3 to 30 inches.
However, mottles with chroma of 2 or less are lacking within
depths of 40 inches.  The A and B2 horizons are sand, fine
sand, loamy sand or loamy fine sand.  The B3 and C horizons
are sand or fine sand.

     1j?6 NemadJi JLoamy sand.  Delineations of this map unit
typically are elongated in shape and range from 2 to about 30
acres in size.  Some areas of these soils are in cropland and
pasture and others are in forest.  The Nemadji series in this
map unit have the full range of properties described for the
series here in a previous paragraph.

     Delineations of Nemadji loamy sand located in sections
4 and 20 have some soils that contain either more coarse sand,
gravel or silt and clay than the Nemadji series.  However,
most interpretations for such soils are similar to those for
the Nemadji series.
                          Newson Series
     The Newson series consists of nearly level, poorly and
very poorly drained, rapidly permeable soils that formed most-
ly in sandy glacial outwash.  These soils have linear to con-
cave slopes on glacial outwash plains.

     The Nevrson series primarily is associated with the
Nemadji and Omega series and with Organic soils.  The Newson
series is wetter than the Nemadji and Omega series and has
colors with lower chroma in the B horizon than those soils.
The Newson series lacks or has a thinner layer of organic
soil material than Organic soils.

     The seasonal high water table typically is within depths
of 1 foot during the months of November through June.  The
                        B-l-22

-------
                                                       23.
water table typically begins at greater depths during other
parts of the year except during periods of above normal rain-
fall.

     A description of a representative pedon (S-81-MN-58-7-
samples 1 t.o 6) of the Newson series in the map unit of
Newson mucky sand loamy (map symbol 274-) located on a slight-
ly concave slope of about 0.5 percent about 1,390 feet west
and 1,720 feet north of the - southeast corner of section 21,
R. 19 W., T. 4.5 N. is in the following paragraphs.  The de-
lineation with this pedon is bounded by delineations of the
Nemadji series, Duluth variant, and Organic soils.  The
pedon is in a thicket of alder with grasses and sedges dom-
inant in the herbaceous layer.  It was described and sampled
4 November 1981.  Free water began at depths of 8 inches.
The soil was very moist above that depth.

     Oa--4. to 0 inches; black (10YR 2/1} sapric material
(muck); strong fine and medium granular structure; very
friable; many very fine, fine and medium roots; pH 4..5;
moderate permeability; abrupt smooth boundary.

     A1(A)--0 to 4- inches; very dark gray (10YR 3/1) sandy
loam; massive; fir.m; breaks into angular fragments under
moderate pressure; few medium and coarse roots; pH 4-.5;
moderately permeability; abrupt smooth boundary.

     B21g(Bgw1 )--4. to 12 inches; dark gray (10YR 4/1) loamy
sand near sandy loam; few fine distinct dark brown (7.5YR
4/4-) mottles; massive; firm; breaks into angular fragments
under moderate pressure; few medium and coarse roots; p'K 4.5;
moderate permeability; clear smooth boundary.

     B22g(Bgw2)--12 to 22 inches; grayish brovrn (10YR 5/2) -
loamy sand; common medium distinct dark brown (7YR A/4-) and
few fine prominent yellowish red (5YR 5/6) mottles; massive;
friable; few very fine to medium roots; pH 5.5; moderately
rapid permeability; gradual smooth boundary.

     C1--22 to 4.9 inches; reddish brown (5YR 5/4.) sand;
single grained; loose; pH 6.0; rapid permeability; diffuse
smooth boundary.

     C2—4-9 to 60 inches; reddish brown (5YR 5/3) sand; few
coarse faint reddish brown (5YR 4V4-) mottles; single grained;
looser pH 6.0; rapid permeability/

     The sola range from 20 to 4^0 inches in thickness.  The
layer of organic soil material is lacking in some pedons and
is thick as 6 inches in others.  The A horizon is loamy sand
or sandy loam.  It is 3 to 8 inches thick.  The B2 horizon
has a matrix with hue of 1OYR to 5Y and chroma of 1 or 2.
It is sand or loamy sand.  The C horizon has a matrix with
hue of 5YR to 10YR.  It is sand or loamy sand.
                        B-l-23

-------
                                                      24.
     274. Newson jnucky sandy loam.  Delineations of this map
unit typically are elongated in shape and range from 3 to 15
acres in size.  Most areas of these soils are in shruby
forest, but some have been cleared and are in pasture.  The
Newson soils in this map unit have the full range in proper-
ties described for the series here in a previous paragraph.

     Delineations of Newson mucky sandy loam in section 4 and
20, have some soils that contain either more coarse sand,
gravel, or silt and clay than the Newson series.  However,
most interpretations for such soils are similar to those for
the Newson series.
                           Omega Series
     The Omega series consists of nearly level to very steep,
somewhat excessively drained, rapidly permeable soils that
formed in sandy glacial outwash.  These soils have convex to
concave slopes on glacial outwash plains and moraines.

     The Omega series primarily is associated with the Nemadji
and Newson series and the Duluth variant and Organic soils.
The Omega series lacks mottles in the B horizon, whereas the
wetter Nemadji and Newson soils have mottles in their B hori-
zon.  The Omega soils are sandy throughout, but the Duluth-
variant soils have horizons in loamy glacial till beginning
within depths of 20 to 4-0 inches.  The Omega series is much
better drained than Organic soils.

     Soils of the Omega series lack a seasonal high water
table beginning within depths of 5 feet.

     A description of a representative pedon (S-81-MN-58-4-
samples 1 to 5) of the Omega series in the map unit Omega
loamy sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes (map symbol 188B) located
on a 2 percent convex slope about 600 feet east and 330 feet
south of the center of section 32, R. 19., T 45 N. is in the
following paragraphs.  The delineation in which this pedon
is located extends for many hundreds of feet to the west and
is bounded on the east at a distance of 100 feet by a delin-
eation of Omega loamy sand, 20 to 60 percent slopes, which is
on the bluffs around the west edge of Passenger Lake.  This
pedon is in a deciduous-coniferous forest.  It was described
and sampled 4 November 1981.  It was moist throughout.

     A1(A)--0 to 3 inches; very dark gray (1OYR 3/1) loamy
sand; weak fine and medium granular structure; very friable;
common clean sand particles; many very fine and fine and
common medium and large roots; pH 4.5; moderately rapid per-
                              B-l-24

-------
                                                      25.
meability; abrupt smooth boundary.

     B21(Bwl)--3 to 9 inches; dark reddish brown (10YR 3/4)
sand near loamy sand; weak fine and medium granular struc-
ture; very friable; many fine and medium and few large roots;
pK 5.5; rapid permeability; gradual smooth boundary.

     B22(Bw2)--9 to 22 inches; reddish brown (5TR 4/4) sand;
weak medium and coarse subangular blocky structure; very
friable; many medium and coarse roots; pH 5.5; rapid perme-
ability; gradual smooth boundary.

     B3KB6D--22 to 38 inches; yellowish red (5YR 4/6) stra-
tified sand and coarse sand; single grained; loose; few
medium and coarse roots; about 2 percent gravel; pH 6.0;
rapis permeability; gradual smooth boundary.

     B32(B62)--38 to 60 inches; reddish brown (5YR 4/4)
coarsesand; single grained; loose; few coarse roots; about
5 gravel; pH 6.5; rapid permeability.

     The thickness of solum ranges from 20 to more than 60
inches in thickness.  The 10 to 40 inch depth zone lacks or
has as much as 10 percent of gravel.  The A1 horizon is 1 to
4 inches in thickness.  It is sand, fine sand, loamy sand,
or loamy fine sand, sandy loam or fine sandy loam.  The B
horizon has a hue of 2.5YR or 5YR.  It is sand, fine sand,
loamy*sand, loamy fine sand, sandy loam, or fine sandy loam
in the upper part and coarse sand, sand or fine sand in the
lower part.

     1 88B Omega, loamy sand. 0 to 5 percent slopes.  This map
unit has convex through concave slopes mostly an glacial out-
wash plains.  It is on glacial moraines in a few places.  De-
lineations of this map unit are variable in size and shape.
They range from about 5 acres to more than 100 acres in size.
They typically are elongate in shape.  -They mostly are on the
higher lying parts of the landscapes.  Most areas of these
soils are forested, but some areas are use for pasture, crop-
land, and sites for homes and cabins.  Soils of the Omega
series in this unit have sola that comprise the thicker range
in thickness described in a previous paragraph, but they
have the full range described for other properties.

     Most delineations of this map unit have few included
soils.   However, some soils with more gravel, or coarse sand,
or silt and clay are included in this map unit primarily in
section 4 and 22.  Also, a few soils with layers of loamy
sand, loamy fine sand or finer textures in the B horizon are
included in a few places.  Further soils that have mottles
in the lower part of the B horizon or in the upper part of
the C horizon are included in a few places.  Small areas of
poorly drained or wetter soils are included in a few places,
and most of them are indicated by the symbol for wet spots.

                          B-l-25

-------
                                                      26.
A few small areas with steeper slopes are included in a few
places.

     188C Omega loamy sand. 5 to 20 percent slopes.  This map
unit mostly has convex slopes.  However, linear and concave
slopes commonly are on lower lying parts of this map unit.
Most of this unit is on glacial outwash plains, but it is on
glacial moraines in a few places.  Most delineations of this
unit are elongated and rather narrow in shape.  They pri-
marily are on slopes adjacent to lakes, peat bogs, and drain-
age ways.  Thy mostly range from 5 to 30 acres in size.  Most
areas of these soils are forested, but a few areas are in
pasture or sites for homes and cabins.  Soils of the Omega
series in this unit have sola that comprise the intermedi-
ate range in thickness described in a previous paragraph,
but they have the full range described for other properties.

     Most delineations of this map unit have few included
soils.  However, some soils with more coarse sand and gravel
in the solum and C horizon or more silt and clay in the A
horizon are included in a few places.  Such included soils
are mostly in delineations of this map unit in sections 3,
4., and 22.  A few small areas with slopes of less than 5
percent or more than 20 percent are included in some delin-
eations .

     188E Omega loamy sand, 20 to 60 percent slopes.  This
map unit mostly has convex slopes, but it has linear and
concave slopes on the lower lying parts.  Most of this unit
is on glacial outwash plains.  Delineations of it there .are
narrow and elongate and typically 10 to 30 acres in size.
They mostly are on bluffs along lakes and peat bogs.  It is
on hills in glacial moraines in a few places.  Delineations
of it there are elongate to circular in shape and typically
are 3 to 20 acres in size.  Most areas of this unit are in
forest.  Soils of the Omega series in this unit have sola
in the thin range in thickness, but they have the full range
described for other properties.

     Most delineations of this map unit have few included
soils.  However, some soils with more coarse sand and gravel
in the solum and C horizon, or more silt and clay in the A
horizon and upper part of the B horizon are included in a
few places.  Also, small areas of the Duluth series and
Duluth variantgoils are included in a few places.  A few
small areas with slopes of less than 20 percent or more than
60 percent are included in some delineations.

                          B-l-26

-------
                                               27.
                     INVESTIGATION PROCEDURES
     I began a review of the literature about the soils and
soil forming factors of the area immediately after WAPORA made
initial contact with me on 2 September 1981.  The more impor-
tant literature that I reviewed follows.

     Clayton, L. and T.F. Freers (Chief Ed.'s). 1967
     Glacial geology of the Missouri Coteau and adjacent
     area.  N.D. Geol. Sur. Mis. Series 30.  170 pp.

     Cummins, J.F. and D.F. Grigal.  1981.  Soils and land
     surfaces of Minnesota - 1981.   Minn.  Agr.  Exp.  Sta.
     Soils Series Mo. 110, Misc. Pub. 11.  59 pp.  Map.

     Lewis, R.R., P.R.C. Nyberg, R.O. Paulson,  and J.A. Sharp.
     1978.  Soil Survey of Carlton County, Minnesota.  U.S.D.A.
     Soil Cons. Serv. Gov. Printing Off.  77 pp.  Maps.

     Simmons, C.S. and A.E. Shearin.  1941.  Soil Survey of
     Pine County, Minnesota.  U.S.D.A.   Bur. Plant Ind.
     44 pp.  Maps.

     Soil Survey Staff.  1978.  Soil survey laboratory data
     and descriptions for some soils of Minnesota.  U.S.D.A.
     Soil Cons. Serv. and Minn. Agr. Exp.  Sta.   Soil Sur.
     Invest. Rpt. No. 33.  123 pp.

     Wright, H.E., Jr. 1972, Quaternary history of Minnesota.
     Pp. 515-548 in Sims, P.K.  and G.B.  Morey (Ed.'s)  Geol-
     ogy of Minnesota - A centennial volume.  Minn.  Geol.  Sur.

     Wright, H.E., Jr. 1973.  Tunnel valleys, glacial surges,
     and subglacial hydrology of the Superior lobe,  Minn-
     esota.  Geol. Soc. Am. Mem.  136:251-276.

     Wright, H.E., Jr. and W.A. Watts.   1?69  Glacial and
     vegetational history of northeastern  Minnesota.  Minn.
     Geol. Surv.  SP-11.  59 pp.

     I did have some knowledge of the soils of  the area be-
cause I worked in soil survey in Minnesota from 1965-1979.
During that period, I was State Soil Correlator, Assistant
State Soil Scientist and State Soil Scientist for the Soil
Conservation Service.  I was involved in field  reviews,
sampling and correlation for the soil survey of Carlton
County.

     I received verbal approval of  ray proposal  for this soil
survey on 11 September 1981.  I began field work on  14 Sept-
ember 1981, and completed it 5 November 1981.

     My first task enroute to the field was to  stop  at the
district office of the Soil Conservation Service at  Hinckley,
                           B-1-27

-------
                                                        28.
Minnesota.  I wanted to inform them about my project, and,
more importantly, to determine if any mapping had been done
in the survey area.  I learned that about 500 acres had been
mapped.  I borrowed aerial photography of 22 April 1957 from
them because it was of excellent quality especially for
stereoptic viewing and it had all previous soil mapping on it

     Procedures used in this soil survey were within the
specifications of both the National and Minnesota Cooperative
Soil Surveys as recorded in the following documents.

     Soil Survey Staff.  1951.  Soil Survey Manual.
     U.S.D.A. Handb. 18, 503 pp.

     Soil Survey Staff.  1974- to present.  National Soils
     Handbook.  (An evolving, working document.)

     Soil Survey Staff.  1975.  Soil taxonomy:  a basic
     system of soil classification for making and inter-
     preting soil surveys.  U.S.D.A. Handb. 436, 754- pp.
     Soil Survey Staff.  Various dates.
     descriptions and interpretations.
Soil series
     Soil Survey Staff, Minn.  1979.  Soil survey mapping
     legend, Minnesota.  Minn. Coop. Soil Surv.   4-6 pp.

     Soil as used in the report refers to the upper 60 inches
of the regolith.

     I made a reconniassance of the survey area during my
first few days in the field to develop a trial legend for
mapping. During this period I studied the landscape, geo-
logic materials, and soils of the area.

     I began mapping on 21 September 1981.  I mainly used two
sets of aerial photography while mapping,•namely the 9 April
1977 photography of Mark Kurd Aerial Surveys, Inc. which had
been enlarged to a scale of 1:9,750 and the 22 April 1957
photography that I had borrowed form S.C.S.  The later was
at a scale of 1:15,84,0 and it was used primarily for stere-
optic study of the landscape.  The former was used for re-
cording boundaries.  Also, the true color photography of
11 October 1980 at a scale of 1:30,000 and the color infra-
red photography of 20 October 1980 at a scale of 1:7,000
were used to further study the landscape and soil boundaries.
These latter two sets of photography are in the report "EPA-
Resource inventory and septic system survey, Moose Lake- -
Windmere Sewer District, Minnesota, October-November 1980'-'.

     Tools used in this soil survey include various kinds of
sampling tubes, bucket augers, and shovels for examining the
soil.  A clinometer was used for measuring the inclination
of slopes.  A "Hellige-Truog soil reaction tester kit" was

                          B-U28

-------
                                                         29.
used for determing soil pH.  Munsell color charts were used
for measuring soil color.  A "pocket" stereoscope was used
for studying aerial photographs.

     Ten pedons were described and sampled 2-5 November 1981.
Most pedons were exposed by digging a small pit to depths of
30 to 40 inches.  A large bucket auger was subsequently used
to obtain samples from that depth to a depth of oO inches.
One pedon was described and sampled from road-cut.  The pedon
of an organic soil was exposed with a "Macaulay peat sampler."
Samples of about £ pint in size were collected from all soil
horizons in each pedon.  Large samples of about 1 quart in
size were collected from 2 to 4- major horizons of each pedon.
A standard indentifacation symbol was given to each pedon.
For example, in the symbol .S-81-58-1-2,  S signifies sample,
81 is the year 1981, 58 is the number for Pine County, 1 is
the pedon number, and 2 is the second horizon sampled from
that pedon.  In the introduction to pedon descriptions in the
section of this report entitled "Description of Soils11 the
last entry in the identification number, 1 to 6 for example,
indicates that 6 horizons were sampled from that pedon.

     A.E. Jacobson, an SCS soil scientist stationed at Duluth,
Minnesota, and I conducted a review and correlation of this soil
survey on 23 October 1981.
                                                    The nain
     Boundaries between soils along the boundary between
Carlton and Pine Counties do not join some places.
reason for these no-joins is that this survey was mapped at
a larger scale and at higher intensity than was the survey of
Carlton County.
                         B-l-29

-------

-------
  Appendix  B-2,
SOIL MAP PLATES

-------

-------
    SOIL MAP PLATES OF THE LAND AREA




IMMEDIATELY SURROUNDING ISLAND, STURGEON,




        RUSH, AND PASSENGER LAKES
             Pine County  MN
           Scale: 6 inches/mile

-------

-------
LOCATION AND BOUNDARIES OF SOIL MAP PLATES -  1  through  12
                                               m
                     B-2-1

-------
                          Soil Map Identification Legend

                                     for
            SOIL SURVEY OF A PORTION OF WINDEMERE TOWNSHIP, PINE COUNTY, MN
                                 - Map Units -
Map symbol
Name of soil
186 	 Nemadj i loamy sand
188B 	 Omega loamy sand, 0 to 5% slopes
188C 	 Omega loamy sand, 5 to 20% slopes
188E	Omega loamy sand, 20 to 60% slopes
274 	 Newson mucky sandy loam
502 	Dusler loam
504B	 Duluth loam, 1 to 4% slopes
S04C 	iDuluth loam, 4 to 15% slopes
S04E	-. Duluth loam, 15 to 60% slopes
614 	 Blackhoof muck
995 	 Organic soils
1002 	Alluvial soils
1016 	Altered soils
1032 	••- Lake beaches
1350B	 Duluth variant loamy fine sand, 1
1350C 	 Duluth variant loamy fine sand, 4
                                  to
                                  to
4% slopes
15% slopes
                      - Conventional and Special Features -
                                   Section corners

                                   Dams and associated reservoirs

                                   Gravel or sand pits

                                   Perennial drainage way

                                   Intermittent drainage way

                                   End of drainage way

                                   Unnamed lakes and ponds

                                   Soil delineations and map unit symbols

                                   Soil sample site

                                   Small area (1/8 to 1/2 acre) of poorly drained
                                   or wetter soils in delineations of better
                                   drained soils.
                 soil map for which this legend was developed is not rectified
             and thus may not be used to overlay other rectified maps of the area.
                                       8-2-2

-------
B-2-3

-------
                      Plate  #2
B-2-4

-------
B-2-5

-------
B-2-6

-------
B-2-7

-------
B-2-8

-------
B-2-9

-------
B-2-10

-------
late   #9

-------
B-2-12
                      Plate   * 1 0

-------
                      Plate   + 1 1
B-2-13

-------
                                              :
-------
              APPENDIX  B-3
           SOILS TESTING DATA






       Paricle Size Distributions




For Soil Samples Taken in Windemere TN




             Pine County MN

-------

-------
 BORING NO.
 SAMPLE *KO.
 DEPTH
 CLASSIFICATION: Dusler Loam

SIEVE ANALYSIS-

  SAMPLE WEIGHT:  94,61  GRAMS
SOIL TESTING SERVICES, INC.

 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION
B-21T                 STS JOB NO.:
4                     PROJECT    :
17.00-28.00 in.       W/C:  —
                      LL :   —
SIEVE
SIZE
.375"
#4
#10
#16
#40
#60
#140
#200
#325
WEIGHT
RETAINED
0.00
1.07
0.48
0.30
1.55
4.29
7.71
2.39
2.17
PER CENT
RETAINED
0.00
1.13
0.51
0.32
1.64
4.53
8.15
2.53
2.29
PER CENT
PASSING
100.00
98.87
98.36
98.04
96-.41
91.87
83.72
81.20
78.91
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS-

  SAMPLE WEIGHT:  52.03  GRAMS
  SOIL SPECIFIC GRAVITY:
  ZERO HYDROMETER HEIGHT:  10.45
  CORRECTION FACTOR:  5.5
         DATE:  1-19-82
   22561
r   MOOSE  LAKE WINDEMERE
           SP.GR.:  —
 PL :  —  PI     :  —
ELAPSED
TIME
0.25
0.50
1.00
5.00
8.00
15.00
30.00
60.00
134.00
1390.00
TEMPERATURE

22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
ACTUAL
READING
50.00
48.50
46.50
45.00
44.00
42.50
40.50
38.00
35.00
27.00
ADJUST
READING
44.50
43.00
41.00
39.50
38.50
37.00
35.00
32.50
29.50
21.50
GRAIN
SIZE
0.0740
0.0531
0.0383
0.0174
0.0139
0.0103
0.0074
0.0053
0.0037
0.0012
PER CENT
FINER
83.24
80.43
76.69
73.89
72.02
69.21
65.47
60.79
55.18
40.22
                              B-3-1

-------
       «S    OS   I   |
       00    U   I   I


       Ot    W
       «—i    O  •-  ••
       I     2   •
       .-•    M  OS
             2  O
       i
*    3
                 a- M
                 to ou
en
ee
u
V.
^4     p»4
          -> u     }
          SO tn
          ul O


          (M JC
          c u
          en C  u
       Z H 05  --
       C OT ft.  3
       1-1
       te.
          5


          O
i-l
1^
C
z •        is.
H> H     C 4)
< -t     O •—
OS CN      • 
-------
                  SOIL TESTING SERVICES, INC.
                   GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION
BORING
SAMPLE
DEPTH
NO. :
NO. :
•
II-B3
7
52.00 -60.00
CLASSIFICATION: Duluth varient


in.
loam
STS JOB NO
PROJECT
W/C: —
LL : -r
fine sand
SIEVE ANALYSIS-
SAMPLE











WEIGHT:
SIEVE
SIZE
.375"
#4
#10
#16
#40
#60
#140
#200
#325
72.83 GRAMS
WEIGHT
RETAINED
0.00
0.48
0.36
0.20
1.10
3.36
6.13
1.84
2.17

PER CENT
RETAINED
0.00
0.66
0.49
0.27
1.51
4.61
8.42
2.53
2.98

PER CENT
PASSING
100.00
99.34
98.85
98.57
97.06
92.45
84.03
81.50
78.52
                                                DATE: 1-19-82
                                        :  22561
                                        :  MOOSE LAKE WINDEMERE
                                                  SP.GR.:  —
                                        PL :  —  PI     :  —
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS-

  SAMPLE WEIGHT:  51.61
  SOIL SPECIFIC GRAVITY:
  ZERO HYDROMETER HEIGHT:
  CORRECTION FACTOR:  5.5
  ELAPSED
   TIME
     0.25
     0.50
     1.00
     5.00
     8.00
    15.00
    30.00
    60.00
   120.00
  1425.00
TEMPERATURE
   22,
   22,
   22,
   22.
   22,
   22.
   22.
   22.
   22,
   22.5
GRAMS
10.45
ACTUAL
READING
49.00
47.00
45.50
42.00
40.50
39.00
36.00
33.00
30.00
18.00


ADJUST
READING
43.50
41.50
40.00
36.50
35.00
33.50
30.50
27.50
24.50
12.50


GRAIN
SIZE
0.0737
0.0531
0.0381
0.0176
0.0141
0.0104
0.0076
0.0055
0.0040
0.0012


PER CENT
FINER
81.56
77.81
75.00
68.44
65.63
62.81
57.1?
51.56
45.94
23.44
                                 B-3-3

-------
                              OS
                              Q
             K
       (M    PS   I
       CO    W   I
       i     r   '
       o*    bi
       ^*    o  »•
       t
V
i
M 02
3 O

W el  W
US CO  ft.
<
-J
CJ
2
o
»•*

se
u
en

o
2
M

cn
O
tA
   --»  w
   v0  (A
   IT)  C
   (S  O
   M  £
   P3  H
   O  O
   •->  ta
       n ..
   «  O O
Z H  OS ««*
C OT  0- 3
             J
             pu
                 i   i
                              (C
                              K
                              z

                              w

                              bl
                              M
                              en
           a*
          i-t
                    i
N
»-*
(A
EC  I
O H*
          o
       ^1    (A
                    I
          ii     g

          Ob:     hi
          Z -2  B M
          i-i ft.  H tn
          S 5  ?; ^
          c «c  faj —:
          K CR  C U
                           CO >-^

                              CO
                              CU
                                                               B-3-4

-------
 BORING NO.    :
 SAMPLE NO.    :
 DEPTH         :
 CLASSIFICATION:
      SOIL TESTING SERVICES, INC.

       GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION
      B-31                  STS JOB NO.:
      4                     PROJECT    :
      22.00-38.00  in.       W/C:  —
      Omega loamy sand
LL :  —
SIEVE ANALYSIS-

  SAMPLE WEIGHT:  147.99  GRAMS
SIEVE
SIZE
.75-
.5"
#4
#10
#16
#40
#60
#140
#200
#325
WEIGHT
RETAINED
0.00
3.24
2.87
2.89
4.39
56.83
57.70
12.81
1.26
0.20
PER CENT
RETAINED
0.00
2.19
1.94
1.95
2.97
38.40
38.99
8.66
0.85
0.14
PER CENT
PASSING
100.00
97.81
95.87
93.92
90.95
52.55
13.56
4.91
4.05
3.91
         DATE:  1-19-82
   22561
:   MOOSE  LAKE WINDEMERE
           SP.GR.:   —
 PL :  —  PI    I   —i
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS-

  SAMPLE WEIGHT:  54.08
  SOIL SPECIFIC GRAVITY:
  ZERO HYDROMETER HEIGHT:
  CORRECTION FACTOR:  5.5
  ELAPSED
   TIME

     0.25
     0.50
     1.00
     5.00
     8.00
    15.00
    30.00
    60.00
   127.00
  1390.00
TEMPERATURE
   22.
   22.
   22.
   22.
   22.
   22.
   22.
   22.
   22.
   22.5
GRAMS
10.45
ACTUAL
READING
8.00
8.00
8.00
8.00
8.00
8.00
8.00
7.50
7.00
6.50


ADJUST
READING
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.00
1.50
1.00


GRAIN
SIZE
0.1043
0.0737
0.0521
0.0233
0.0184
0.0135
0.0095
0.0068
0.0047
0.0014


PER CENT
FINER
4.40
4.40
4.40
4.40
4.40
4.40
4.40
3.52
2.64
1.76
                                 B-3-5

-------
                                               OWZH  cjO•
                                           coooco
                                                        «a-    up     \o
          u  .
     g0    M  |   '

     CV    U
     _t    Q  .- ..
     I    Z  •
     -I    t-t  CH
          &  U
     • •       •
     U    K  fl- M
     H    t*  CO Cu

     2    2


       SS     '
       in o

       Si    -
     Z
     C
             3.. ..
             u
       H a: -•» J
       co BU  K i-9
(A
fifi
u
en

i
P
J
     EC

     OS

     CO
     M
     Q



     N

     CO
                       CO
                       05
                       b)

                       8
                       CO
               i—   W  v*
O    «
       -«   o o>
               Z
               O
        C C
        Z K
               u
               M
               fa-
        Z -!  S CO
        « a.  s- to
        BS Z  O. <
        C <  U i-3
        S5 CO  C U
                       z
                       M
                       Z

                       £
                       C
                       u
                       1-1
                       CA
                                            B-3-6

-------
                  SOIL TESTING SERVICES, INC.

                   GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION           -       DATE: 1-19-82
 BORING NO.    :   B-22T                 STS JOB NO.:  22561
 SAMPLE NO.    t   5                     PROJECT    t MOOSE LAKE WINDEMERE
 DEPTH         :   22.00-36.00 in.       W/C:  —              SP.GR.:  —
 CLASSIFICATION:   Duluth Loam #1        LL : —     PL  :  —  PI    :  —

SIEVE ANALYSIS-

  SAMPLE WEIGHT:   86.79  GRAMS
SIEVE
SIZE
#4
#10
#16
#40
#60
#1*0
#200
#325
WEIGHT
RETAINED
0.00
0.22
0.23
1.31
4.21
7.64
2.49
2.26
PER CENT
RETAINED
0.00
0.25
0.27
1.51
4.85
8.80
2.87
2.60
PER CENT
PASSING
100.00
99.75
99.48
97.97
93.12
84.32
81.45
18.85.
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS-

  SAMPLE WEIGHT:  51.66
  SOIL SPECIFIC GRAVITY:
  ZERO HYDROMETER HEIGHT:
  CORRECTION FACTOR:  5.5
  ELAPSED
   TIME
     0.
     0.
     1,
     5.
    .25
    .50
    .00
    .00
   8.00
  15.00
  30.00
  60.00
 120.00
1405.00
          TEMPERATURE
22.
22.
22.
22,
22,
               22.5
               22.5
               22.5
               22.5
               2Z.5
GRAMS
10.45
ACTUAL
READING
49.00
47.50
45.50
42.50
41.50
40.00
38.00
35.50
33.00
25.00


ADJUST
READING
43.50
42.00
40.00
37.00
36.00
34.50
32.50
30.00
27.50
19.50


GRAIN
SIZE
0.0737
0.0529
0.0381
0.0175
0.0140
0.0103
0.0074
0.0054
0.0039
0.0012


PER CENT
FINER
82.23
79.39
75.61
69.94
68.05
65.21
61.43
56.71
51.98
36.86
                                B-3-7

-------
                                Q	r*
     eo

     o\
     I
          8
          M OS
          » u
       \o
             3**

             U
        t- PE «•*.
        09 a, s
«»
H
              • fO

             vO O
u   en
en   M
     O
O
z   ^
M   N
H   (-
en   en
u           •'.' •

H   5*-    05
J   < CM    O  3
M   OS CS     •  3
c   o i     ««* *z
«0      SB «rt «M  =
        cc

                bu
        U U    (->
        z -: s  OT
        M a. H  w
        06 Z O.  <
        C < til  J
        eo en e  o
                                                       B-3-8

-------
                  SOIL TESTING SERVICES, INC.
 BORING NO.
 SAMPLE NO.
 DEPTH
 CLASSIFICATION: Dllluth loam #2
       GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION
      B-22T                 STS JOB NO.
      4                     PROJECT
      18.00 -38.00 in.      W/C:   —
                            LL :   —
         DATE:  1-19-82
:   22561
:   MOOSE  LAKE WINDEMERE
           SP.GR.:  —
PL :   —  PI    :  —
SIEVE ANALYSIS-
  SAMPLE WEIGHT:  111.5  GRAMS
SIEVE
SIZE
#4
#10
#16
#4Q
#60
#140
#200
#325
WEIGHT
RETAINED
o.oo
0.69
0.29
1.27
3.64
6.43
2.05
2.21
PERCENT
RETAINED
0.00
0.62
0.26
1.14
3.26
5.77
1.84
1.98
PER CENT
PASSING
100.00
99.38
99.12
97.98
94.72
88.95
87.11
85.13
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS-

  SAMPLE WEIGHT:  51.67
  SOIL SPECIFIC GRAVITY:
  ZERO HYDROMETER HEIGHT:
  CORRECTION FACTOR:  5.5
  ELAPSED
   TIME

     0.25
     0.50
     1.00
     5.00
     8.00
    15.00
    30.00
    63.00
   125.00
  1386.00
TEMPERATURE
   22.5
   22,
   22.
   22.
   22.
   22.
   22.
   22.
   22.
   22.5
GRAMS
10.45
ACTUAL
READING
51.50
51.00
50.00
48.00
46.50
45.00
42.50
39.00
35.50
23.50


ADJUST
READING
46.00
45.50
44.50
42.50
41.00
39.50
37.00
33.50
30.00
18.00


GRAIN
SIZE
0.0724
0.0515
0.0368
0.0168
0.0135
0.0100
0.007Z
0.0051
0.0037
0.0012


PER CENT
FINER
87.17
86.22
84.32
80.53
77.69
74.85
70.11
63.48
56.85
34.11
                                B-3-9

-------
     OC
C
CA
SS

3
              fc, M
              « ou
                 I
        •n o
        fM O
        CM Z
        o

        » f-
        c u
        •-J W
M   2
     o
 •   l-«
c£   H
Ed   5
y   6C
M   M
>   os
as   H

M   >-t
     N
     M
     cn
   CO
   73
        ea -
                                                        B-3-10

-------
                  SOIL TESTING SERVICES, INC.
                   GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION
 BORING NO.    :  B-3
 SAMPLE NO.    :  6
 DEPTH         :  49.00-60.00  in.
 CLASSIFICATION: Quluth loam #2
SIEVE ANALYSIS-

  SAMPLE WEIGHT:
71.43  GRAMS
                                          DATE:  1-19-82
                      STS JOB NO.:   22561
                      PROJECT    :   MOOSE LAKE WINDEMERE
                      W/C:  —              SP.GR.:   —
                      LL :  —    PL :   —  PI    :   —
SIEVE
SIZE
#4
no
#16
#40
#60
#140
#200
#325
WEIGHT
RETAINED
0.00
0.17
0.15
0.52
1.60
3.15
1.09
1.40
PER CENT
RETAINED
0.00
0.24
0.21
0.73
2.24
4.41
1.53
1.96
PER CENT
PASSING
100.00
99.76
99.55
98.82
96.58
92-17
90.65
88.69
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS-

  SAMPLE WEIGHT:  51  GRAMS
  SOIL SPECIFIC GRAVITY:
  ZERO HYDROMETER HEIGHT:  10.45
  CORRECTION FACTOR:  5.5
ELAPSED
TIME
0,25
0.50
1.00
5.00
8.00
15.00
30.00
60.00
120.00
1410.00
TEMPERATURE

22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
ACTUAL
READING
52.50
51.00
50.00
47.00
46.00
44.00
42.00
38.00
34.00
19.00
ADJUST
READING
47.00
45.50
44.50
41.50
40.50
38.50
36.50
32.50
28.50
13.50
GRAIN
SIZE
0.0710
0.0510
0.0365
0.0168
0.0134
0.0100
0.0072
0.0053
0.0038
0.0012
PER CENT
FINER
90.01
87.13
85.22
79.47
77.56
73.73
69.90
62.24
54.58
25.85
                               B-3-11

-------
    «M
    r   g -."

    -*   ss
    •»      »
    Ed   tti ft. M
    H   a* « a.

    e   3   .


      »a OT
      irt p
      cs O   ••

      ~*   J
            Oi
          i  r
o
z
    Z
    o
      09 C U
en


O

)•<
H



H
            CM
    td
    N
    (A
    as o
    O I
       ..   g

      ii   8
      2 Z   M

      O W   (-(
      2 ^ ae cc
      l-t O. H CO

      c§£2
      ffo tn O o
                                                                       —    O
                                      B-3-12

-------
                              Appendix B-4.
             SUMMARY AND INTERPRETATION OF SOILS INFORMATION
     B-4.1.  Soil Types

     Each  soil  association  (Section  2.2.1.)  contains a  number of  soil
types.  A  brief -description  of the eleven  identified  soil  types follows,
including a-discussion of the topography,-drainage properties (Figure B-l)»
and other characteristics  of  the area's soils  in  relation  to the suitabi-
lity  for conventional soil absorption systems  (Table B-l )•   No assessment
is made of  the suitability of  the area's  soils for "innovative" or uncon-
ventional on-,site waste treatment systems.
                               B-4-1

-------
                   iiiiimmiimiiiiimi
                                        Z m
                                        iiiiiiiiiiiii
                                                                                 B
                                                                                 O
                                                                                 1-1
                            •O
                            a
                            < s
                                                >«
                                             1!!
                                                   IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
                                                                            CL,

                                                                            •H
to
ui
E
                       jc  a ~
                       ca  0 o
                            iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiimiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
                                                                                 o
                                                                                 H
                                                                                  a)
                                                                                 •o
                                                                                  c
o
03
                  *
                  > «
                  3 ~
                  — O
                                                             
UI
o
or
o

          v « c« >»
         —  M-  «»

         Sffge
         1 s &*
          **3*Z
           ., S  •ZB*>«CC
1SS*«8.= >.I'8
•5aS.-e «,s!3£S.fc
» a o *• 2.C ojsjs S1*
gbt>a£«'n«>B^
«>     e      -5
             &
O
to
                                                                                  (0
                                                                                 i-l •
                                                                                 -H *~*
                                                                                  O O)
                                                                                  to r-~
                                                                                   o\
                                                                                 IM i-l
                                                                                  O ^

                                                                                  w to
                                                                                  a) o
                                                                                  OO 0}
                                                                                  to ^-»
                                                                                  CO — »
                                                                                  ^-1 00
                                                                                  00
                                                                                  td >•>
                                                                                  C a>
                                                                                  •H c
                                                                                  CO C!
                                                                                  M -H
                                                                                  PQ
                              B-4-2

-------
in the surveyed

CQ
t-H
•i-l
O
co

V,
o

w
oo
S

4J



6 •

4J CO
co i*»
CO — 1

C W
0 O
•H C/3

cx •-

O OO
CO 
Rl
r-H 01
•H C
o d
CO -H
fn
C
cti CU
•rl
U) X
O 10
•H C
CO O
•rn t-H
S s
CJ CU
cd 6
>-i CU
ct! T3
-C C

CO
CU 4-1
•i-( O
I-l
fll p*
vtf M
W O
•H

•H t-<
O O
CO O.

*
|
1
«
CU
•H
43

H





Range SCS Bating Soil a
r) Absorption Systems
s
X 0
" A
•H *x.
f-1 B>
2 .£
e u
it e
a vi
«"






41
i-(
0 .0
" h!
j:
0. 01
Ol *J
Q £


B
3 01
a 3
M w
a S
J> H
3
41 U
S S
>M (->
u. x
3£


4)
C 'u
2 I
41 hi
0. o>
o a
.-4 xx
(0




TJ
C i-l
a o
0. B
8 «

z OT

*H e

SI

W 2*
8







*J
S B
S 3
C w
1 2
3 «
"O a
H J3
<-. 3
o. ta
a.
a
4X
O. Cf-l & £
ana a a
U V 40 01 4)
q> a) « O
o o •& o

0 >0 0 0



.
00 S
; s : : : i — i
CM CM CM CM CM I |
p>4


i § s
o o o
a . •"" . rt *"*
o " x" x «
•-• q q -<
u u •

•§ ^|
gH) a Ji r-l
: s s So
o x o 3 w
rH B FH S ^H
q -H
0 0




o
in *o
•* -H 1 ^ OJ ~t
-i ^ !Q J, i i






DQ (J b) PQ O CM >^
o o o in >n in  0
o
•£ X M JC
9 y r-t  ti i. .4
on oi 4i 01 a.
*"• Ctf 41 41 0)
ua n c/) o
XX
O
O
O
*
o

^
•
CM
CM
XX
0
O

CM
i


o





!«



4-1
q
0)
Q.

CJ
3
a
v
&
J4
I



CM






m
en
0.








u
•H
O

CO
Cx













s
d
i

a
4i d

•£ X
4 rH

hi a
2 i










13 HO 41
B B i-l
O V4 ^
•H -0 q
o o -H
4 O 14
u —I q
u IM >


S
O


rj
a
3
§
o
1 *H
X
3
a
§



-4
£ 1






 W
3 41
f-4 r*t














V
ft
4
*•*
U
«

S
00

ft
J
o
rH
«

a

'
4-1
3
*T
O«
O
B
I
rt
a

x

•rt
q
0)
CL
i-f
a

1
a.
a
41
q
a
a
44
a
x
a

B
O
4*
Q.
hi
O
a
.a
a

₯4
o
a
o

a
e
o

q
1

*
q

a
CO
B
~4
•i

•Q
nnesota
«*4
X
4J
^
**
>^

T9
N
G
eO
0
CI

Iri
0

V

*J

^
§
«
«
JS
^
1

A
41
q
U
Or
O
o.
5
*M
o
Jr
3
a
a
•H
•H
O

41

BO
0
h
3
•O

•o



^
d
V
•o •
•<1 X

«3

a a
»< T<
a
01
.3 3

o q
« k.
« 2.
« 0
V 1

^




















*
B
41
41
C^

•H
e


3
P^
S.
•rt
a
01
o.
c.
3
a
b.
o>
1
3
O
(H
00
a
*•
•a
q
q

•H
e
41

O
O.


B
41
01
L.
a.
4»

£•
5
2
4fl
S

4*
CU

0.

ii
B-4-3

-------
 Loamy Soils

      Soils with loamy  substrata predominate  in  the northern  half of  the
 surveyed  area.  The  loamy soils Identified  in  the survey include the  Du-
 luth, Duluth Variant, Dusler,  and Blackhoff series.

 Duluth Loam
     The  Duluth series consists of  gently  undulating to very steep, mode-
 rately  well and  well -drained, moderately  slow and slowly permeable soils
 that  formed mostly  in loamy calcareous  glacial till on glacial moraines.
 They  mostly have  convex  slopes,  but they  may  also have linear or concave
 slopes on the lower  parts of  some  steep and very steep slopes.
     The  SCS  rates  Duluth  soil as  having  "severe   limitations  to soil
absorption systems use because of its  relatively  slow permeability.   Duluth
soil can  accommodate a soil absorption  system under  certain conditions if
the -design is appropriate.   However, on  sites with  steep slopes, or with
lot  size  constraints or  with low  soil  permeabilities,  unconventional -de-
signs  for soil absorption systems may have to be used to obtain  satisfac-
tory performances.
     It  is estimated  that  approximately 60% of  the platted lakeshore lot
area  around Island  Lake is mapped  as Duluth  soil.   Most  of  the platted
areas with Duluth soil are found along the south shore of the Lake.  Duluth
soil is  also  common along the north half of Sturgeon Lake, covering appro-
ximately 40% of its platted lakeshore lot area.  Duluth soil was not mapped
in  significant amounts  around  the  platted  shoreline areas  of  Rush and
Passenger lakes.

Duluth Variant
     Duluth Variant soil consists of gently sloping and sloping, moderately
well and well-drained, moderately slow and slowly permeable soils that were
formed  in  a  20- to 40-inch  thick mantle  of sandy glacial outwash material
and in underlying loamy calcareous glacial till on glacial moraines.  These
soils may have both convex and linear slopes.

                            B-4-4

-------
      As was-discussed in  Section  2.2.1., Duluth Variant soils are found in
 the transition area  between the  two major  soil associations.   The  upper
 horizons of  the  Duluth Variant  soil have  a  rapid  permeability.   Thus,
 septic tank effluent  absorption  systems  constructed in adequate-depths of
 this upper horizon should  function satisfactorily.  Duluth Variant has not
 been formally  recognized  as a named soil series by the  Cooperative  Soil
 Survey of Minnesota.  Therefore,  no  SCS  rating  for soil absorption system
 operation is available.

      Duluth Variant soil is primarily found at some-distance from the lake-
 shore away  from  existing -development  within the  surveyed  area.   Although
 common in the  surveyed area,  Duluth Variant soil was mapped on only approx-
 imately 10% of  the platted  lake shore  lot area around  Island Lake, and  on
 approximately  5% of the  platted area around  Sturgeon Lake.  Duluth Variant
 soil is uncommon  in the  vicinity of Rush  and  Passenger  lakes.

 Busier Loam and  Blackhoof Muck

      Dusler soil  consists  of nearly level,  somewhat poorly  and  poorly
-drained,  slowly permeable soils that  were formed mostly  in  loamy calcareous
 glacial till.   This soil  has slightly convex to slightly concave slopes on
 glacial moraines.

      Blackhoof soil  consists  of a  nearly  level,  very poorly-drained,  slowly
 to  very slowly permeable  soil that was formed  in  a  thin mantle of organic
 soil and in underlying  loamy glacial till or in old  aluvium or  both.   This
 soil has concave or linear  slopes and  is found  in-depressions and-drainage
 ways on glacial moraines.

     Dusler and Blackhoof  soils both have "severe" soil absorption  system
 ratings according  to  the  SCS.    Although  Dusler  soil  has a permeability
 similar to  Duluth soil,   septic systems are still more difficult to operate
 in  Dusler soil because Dusler soil is often poorly-drained.   In  addition to
 having  low  permeability,  Blackhoof soil also  has the water  table within one
 foot of the land surface.  Therefore,  conventional soil absorption systems
 will not  function  properly in Blackhoof soil.
                            B-4-5

-------
      Dusler and Blackhoof soils each are mapped on approximately 3% percent
 of the platted lakeshore lot area around Island Lake, mostly in areas along
 the northwest  shoreline.  Dusler  and  Blackhoof soils are uncommon on plat-
 ted  lakeshore lots  around  Sturgeon,  Rush,  or Passenger  lakes.   However,
 relatively large  areas of  these  soils  are found adjacent  to  platted lots
 along the northwest shore of Sturgeon Lake.

 Sandy Soils

      Soils with  sandy substrata  predominate  in the  southern  half  of  the
 surveyed  area.   The  sandy  soils  identified  in  the  survey are  the Omega,
 Nemadji,  and  Newson  series.   A  special  classification termed  Lake Beach
 soil was  also  made in the southern portion of the surveyed area.

 Omega Loamy Sand^

      The  Omega series  consists  of nearly level to very steep,  somewhat ex-
 cessively -drained,  rapidly  permeable  soils  that were  formed  from sandy
 glacial outwash  materials.   These soils  have convex to  concave slopes on
 glacial outwash plains and moraines.

      Septic tank absorption  systems  operate  very   well  in  Omega  soil.
 However,  the  SCS  rates Omega  soil as  having  severe limitations  for soil
 absorbtion systems   because  this  soil   may   occasionally have   excessive
•drainage  (high  permeability).   This  rating  is -due  to  the potential  for
 wastewater  to  pass through  Omega  soils  too quickly for proper  treatment to
 occur,  thereby causing adjacent wells to become contaminated.   The chances
 of such contamination  occuring  can be minimized by not locating absorption
 fields  on  Omega  soils -dominated  by  very  coarse  sand or by replacing  the
 coarse  sand by fine sand  or  loam.
     Omega  loamy sand is  the  predominant  soil in the southern  half of the
 survey  area.   Around Island Lake approximately  8% of  the  platted  lakeshore
 lot  area is mapped  as  Omega  soil,  while Omega  covers approximately 20% of
 the  platted shore area of  Sturgeon  Lake.   The  estimated  proportion of Omega
 soil mapped on  the platted  lakeshore  lot area  around  Rush  and  Passenger
 lakes is much higher; 85%  and  50% respectively.

                              B-4-6

-------
 Nemadji Loamy Sand  and Newson Mucky SandyLoam

      The Nemadji series consists  of  nearly level,  somewhat poorly-drained,
 rapidly permeable  soils  that were  formed in  sandy  glacial outwash  mate-
 rials.   These  soils  have  slightly  convex to  slightly  concave  slopes  on
 glacial outwash plains.

      The Newson  series consists  of  nearly level, poorly  and very  poorly
•drained, rapidly permeable  soils that were formed  mostly  from sandy  glacial
 outwash materials.   These  soils  have  linear  to concave slopes  located  on
 glacial outwash plains.

      Nemadji  and Newson soils are rated  by SCS as having  "severe"  limita-
 tions for the operation of  septic tank absorption systems  because  of poor
 drainage and  the presence of a  high  water table.   There  is little that can
 be  done to engineer conventional  absorption  systems  to  work properly  in
 these two  soils unless the drainage characteristics of  a  site can be physi-
 cally altered.

      Nemadji  and Newson soils are  mapped  on a  small proportion of the  total
 surveyed area  and  a  small  proportion (approximately 1%)  of the  platted
 lakeshore  lot area  around Island Lake.  A small proportion  of the land area
 with  platted   lots  around  Sturgeon Lake  also  is mapped  as Nemadji  soil;
 Newson  soil was not found  near Sturgeon  Lake.   Nemadji and  Newson  soils
 were  not  mapped in  significant  areas around  Rush  and  Passenger  lakes.

 l,ake  Beach

      Lake  Beach soil consists of  a nearly level, very  poorly to  moderately
 well  -drained,  moderately  to  rapidly  permeable soil  that  was  formed  in
 recent  to rather old sandy -deposits  adjacent  to  lakes.   The  formation  of
 this  soil resulted  from the action of water and  ice and the  higher  lying
 parts of this soil  are  a result  of historically higher  lake  levels.

      Lake  Beach  soil has  not  been  formally   recognized  by the  Minnesota
 Cooperative Soil Survey, and  therefore it  has no SCS  soil absorption system
                               B-4-7

-------
 limitation rating.  The characteristics  of  Lake Beach soil relative to the
 operation of  septic tank absorption systems  may vary considerably from site
 to  site.   It  can be  stated  however, that  on Lake  Beach soil with  good
•drainage,  an  absorption system will  probably operate well from  the stand-
 point of  percolation.   It is estimated  that Lake Beach soil  is mapped  on
 roughly 20% of the  platted  lakeshore lot area around Sturgeon Lake, 10% of
 the platted area  around Rush Lake,  and  50% around  Passenger  Lake.  Lakes
 Beach soil is uncommon  along the  shores of Island  Lake.

 Other Soils

      Three miscellaneous soil  types also were Identified -during  the  soil
 survey.   Organic  soil is the major  type  in  this category.   Small  areas  of
 Altered and Alluvial soils also were  identified.

 Organic Soil

      Organic soil  consists of very poorly-drained,  nearly level soil  with
 slow  to moderately rapid permeability.   It  is formed from the  slightly  to
highly -decomposed  remains  of a variety of plants.   Organic soil was found
primarily  in -depressions on glacial moraines  and  out wash plains.   Some  of
 these-depressions were  formerly small  lakes.

     Soil  absorption systems will not operate  properly in  Organic  soil-due
to  poor -drainage  and the presence of  a  high water  table.  Because Organic
soils also possess significant limitations to construction, very  few-dwell-
ings are located on this soil inside the  surveyed area.

     Organic soil  is  mapped  on  approximately  20%  of the total  surveyed
area,  but  is  mapped on less  that  5% of the platted lakeshore lot area
around each of the four lakes.   Large areas of Organic  soil  are found  in
the  wetlands  to the northwest of Sturgeon Lake  (surrounding  a 100 to 120
acre bog),  and  in  a 60 acre wetland  immediately adjacent  to the northeast
shore of Hush Lake.
                              B-4-8

-------
 Altered  and  Alluvial Soils

      Altered soil  was identified  in the soil survey where natural soils had
 been altered by cutting and  filling.   Most altered soils  were  found  adja-
 cent to  the lakeshore in  or near  areas  of Duluth soils, in the  northern
 portion  of the  surveyed area.  Altered  soils may exhibit a range of absorp-
 tion system  performances  -depending on  the -degree of  compaction and  the
 nature  of the fill  materials.  Altered soils are mapped on less than  5% of
 the  platted  lakeshore lot area around  both Island and  Sturgeon Lakes.   No
 Altered  soils were identified around Rush  and  Passenger  lakes.

      Alluvial  soil  consists  of sandy  and  loamy soils that were formed  in
 alluvium (material-deposited  by rivers).   Such  soil is  usually  flooded  one
 or  more  times  each  year,  and  if  this is  the  case would  not  provide  an
 acceptable site medium for  soil absorption systems.  Although limited  areas
 having Alluvial  soil were identified in i:he soil survey,  this soil was  not
 found in significant amounts  on the  platted  lakeshore  lot  areas.

      B-4.2.  Soil Texture

     The SCS  Soil  Survey of  Carlton  County,  Minnesota  (1978)  contains
 particle size-distribution  (texture)-data  for  many  soils of the  same series
 found in the surveyed area.  Particle  size-distributions  were measured  for
 six  representative soils  sampled  in the  surveyed  area  in order to ensure
 that  the textural  classifications were  consistent  with  the classifications
made  for Carlton  County.   Any significant differences in  soil texture will
 be  considered in  the -development  of  wastewater management alternatives.

 Testing Methodology

     Soil particles  are  the -discrete units  which make up  the solid portion
of soils.  The relative  proportions of  the  different  sized  particles  of a
 soil  are  relatively  stable  and  can be used as a basis to -determine  the
agricultural and engineering  properties of  particular soils.  When quanti-
 fied, the proportions of  these particles are  termed 'particle size distri-
butions' .
                             B-4-9

-------
      Particle size -distributions are commonly represented by  the relative
 mass proportions  (percentage  by weight)  of soil  particles less than  or
 equal to a given  particle-diameter.   The proportions  are  measured  by phy-
 sical fractionation  procedures,  usually in  a two step process.  To  frac-
 tionate the larger-diameter soil  particles,  a soil sample  is passed  through
 a series  of  sieves  with -decreasing mesh  sizes,  each sieve  successively
 letting soil  particles  pass through  the mesh openings of known  -diameter.
 The  fractions of clay and  silt are  then measured  by mixing what has passed
 through the smallest sieve  size  with water and  measuring  the change in the
-density of  the water  over time  as the suspended  particles  settle.   The rate
 of  change in -density is related  to  the  size of the particles  by an  empi-
 rical mathematical relationship.

 Comparison of  Sample  Testing Results  with Regional Soil Survey Data

      Particle  size -distributions  reported  in the SCS Carlton  County Soil
 Survey  were compared  to the analytical results  for  six   Pine  County soil
 samples   (Table B-2 ) •   The  Pine County  soil samples were  found to  have
 particle size -distributions which  indicate  a  somewhat  finer texture  of
 soils than those  reported  for  the same  soil types in the Carleton  County
 Soil  Survey.   In the loamy  soils  examined,  the  percent of  material  passing
 through  a number 200 seive  (all  the clay, silt and  part  of the  very fine
 sand)  exceeded  the  upper  limit  of  the estimated range  presented  in  the
 Carlton  County survey.   Based on  these  results,  it was concluded that the
 Duluth  and  Dusler soils in  the project area  are  more silty and  clayey  in
 texture  than  those  in Carlton  County, and thus could  pose  greater constra-
 ints  to  the-design of soil absorption  systems.

      The  particle  size distribution-data can  be further analyzed  to-deter-
mine  whether  the observed  fraction of  fine  particles would actually  limit
 the use  of  septic tank absorption fields in  the surveyed area.  The hydro-
meter  tests  that were  performed  on  the portion  of  the soil sample  which
passed  through the  smallest mesh size can  be used to-distinguish the per-
cent  clay and  the percent silt of the sample  (by weight).   The remainder  is
made  up  of  sand  of varying size-distributions.  The individual  clay,  silt,
and sand  fractions of each sample can then be interrelated to classify the
                                B-4-io

-------
OD

a\


co
U
to
>>
CD
^
Vi
3
CO
I-l
•H
CO

X
^J
G

0
o
c
o
AJ
ti
u

01
X!
Jj

e
o
Vi
UH
a)
cd
•o
P
o
-H
U
3
rO
•H
Vi
4J
CO
"0

0)
IN)
•H
CO
d)
o

4J
M
R)
a
0
o
CO
•H
M
cd
a.
13
o

*
CM
1
S3

0)
r-l
crj
H



e
0)

*-<
•o
a)
c
•H
CO

^
0

CO
4-)
CO
*O

C
o
•I-l
JJ
3
,0

f^
CO
•H

a>
N
•H
ca


1


«4-t
o

P3
o
•H
iJ
Vi
o
ex

CO

M-l
o

I1
Vi
3
CO
rH
o
CO
cu
J_J

00
•S
Vi
3
•a










o
o-
§
m
VM
O
*J
c
g

V






V
1
o
0)

o
JJ
c

u
V
a.




qj
rH
fr
CO
10
»n
O
C
0)
u
£











BJ

*M
O
4J
c
V
u

04



•s
o.
£
















10 sieve (0.074m
'. Hindemere Tn
u ?*i
CM JJ
«k U
M C
•c o
-1 4J
1C tat
2.3

>-\ •
E tS
fS|
*» (U
S i
U T3
II
E
-» >
X* U
5J
OC
e e
TJ3
31.
-3

f,S
O 01
* *J
<>w B
Q)
Q) "O
v 5
•H >-K
O
S *
»s
c e
n u
E rH
CO -i
»3


a
^? ^™
g H
P^ U
> lu
-T U
SP-- B
 C
Jy •£
B

» >.
AOU
c
^ c
(0 0
to 

00

m
"•
i

in






ao
ON




in

•
m
cx>




o
o
-^




00
OI

m

^

s

te
1
VO
                      25
                       e
                       n •

                       « S

                       « ?
                       « li

                      •e^

                       S B
                      •rt O

                      *QC •••*
                       W 01
                         B


                      Us


                       .3 £
                       oi o a
                      3.
                   01

                  *    g
    .J











    §
                        •B
                         Q) <
•o
B
eg




!   "   £3
C   O   O -O


B   S   • *
O   O   u >,
j:   x   a oi
to   to   -• -
                               ff
                               3
         u

         14
         c
                       s s
                      .£ 3
01    O

t    31
                                   O

                                   £
               a
              n
                   to
                   01
                   c

                   e
                   CJ
                  .*
                   to
        o
        e rH

        b o
        to in
        oi
        B >•-


        si

        t&
     O    01
     e    »

n    M    M
j    o    o
     01    tl


a    :    :
•rl    01    01

S   -S   -it
                         §.
    t  f-i
    a   en
    tn   tn u
I   I
o   n
B-4-11

-------
 soil.   These -data are  of interest because silt is much more hydraulically
 conductive  than  clay  and  the  relative  fractions  of  both  must be  known
 before it can be  concluded  that soils are tight enough to pose limitations
 for  the use of septic  absorption fields.   In  general,  a high clay fraction
 indicates poor septic  absorption field  performance  regardless of  silt  or
 sand content.  Conversely, a high silt content  indicates good septic  leac-
 hate  field performance if clay  content is moderate to  low.   Mditionally,
 the  silt/clay fractions can be  used  to-determine  whether the clay and silt
 content is too  low to provide adequate treatment of  septic leachate.

     The  USDA  (1980)  -definition of  silt  includes  those  soil  particles
 within the -diameter range of 0.002 millimeters  to 0.05 millimeters.  Using
 the  particle size -distribution  graphs  (Appendix B-3 to  interpolate within
 these-diameters the silt weight  fraction  can  be-determined.   USDA-defines
 clay as particles of less than  0.002 millimeters  in -diameter.   The weight
 fraction  of  the material  finer than this-diameter  also  can be-determined  by
 interpolating  from  the graphs  in Appendix A.  The percent  by weight  of
 silt,  clay,  and  sand  in six soil  samples were  estimated and  classified
 based  on  the above -definitions  (Table B-3 ).  The  soil textural  classes
 presented  in the  soil  survey (Appendix A) characterize  only the  surface
 horizon.   Samples  from-deeper horizons  must be  analyzed  and  classified for
 the  substratum.   The  six soil  samples tested  for  this  report were  from
 horizons  which  ranged  from  17  to 60  inches in  -depth.   These horizons are
 being  classified  because  soil   characteristics at  that -depth  range are
 important  to the  performance of  septic  absorption fields.  The  silt,  clay,
 and  sand  fractions  for the  six  samples were  plotted  on the  Textural Tri-
angle  presented  in Figure B-2  and the  resultant substratum classifications
were compared with  the descriptions  of those horizons which were made  in
 the field  (Table B-3 ) .

     Comparison  of  the six  substratum classifications  with -descriptions
made in  the  field  indicates that  the soils of the Duluth and  Dusler series
which  were mapped  in Windemere Township had higher than  expected  clay con-
 tent at -depth.   Mditionally,  the relatively fine texture of  these  sampled
horizons  as  compared  to  similar  horizons  reported  in  the  Carlton County
 Soil Survey  appears  to be  a  result  of the high clay content and not  a
                               B-4-12

-------
>,
0
>
Vl
3
CO

rH
•H
0
to

CU
42
4-1
00
C
•H
Vi
3
•a
cu
L/
*-lN
cd
4-1
CO
cu
rH
rv
!
CO
rH
•rl
O
CO

VI
o
U-l
CO
e
o
•H •
4-1 CX
?. "rl
O 43
•H W
«" C
•H S
W O
3H
rH CU
0 Vi
CU
rH 6
cd 0
H Tj
3 C
4J .,-(
X 2
CU
4J UH
u-, °
*H
0 g
g"S
Wtl
>•«
-H O
Vi P.
cd
CX 0]
E
o WH
u o



CO
03
CJ
rH
•s
H
Lassification
ample Based
Fraction by %
u en
4J
rH «U J2
cd x ex
M W -H
3 (U
4J UH tX
X 0
0) (3
H 0
£
rH
u









CM
C
a) o
rH iH
a w
e 
tn vi
cu
cu w
.c jz
u O
UH •«
0 r-l
CU
§-H
PI-
TH
j-» e
fr O
TJ-0
u cu
tO 013
Q) Cd
Q OQ


0
rH
*
rH
U
VJ
«d
CU
M
§
O
rH



^H


4J T3
C C!
cu °)
o tn
ft*
O
CM

M
cu
PL,

>»
n

£ >4 *
o «d[ co
•H rH •»
4JO
u
cd
Vi
PL,

4J
oo t-i &•!
•H rH
eu TH
•» m
3 t/3
f^
CO



£ T1
0
N
TH
VI
£
vO
4J CO
CM 1
CM E
PQ CM
CM




cu
1—
a
§
tn
rH
T
Q
CO
1
O
rH
4J
3
rH
3
«
>,
a
rH
U
>>
4J
rH
•H
10









1
O
rH
C?
rH
U
near
cd
o
rH






M
CO
— 1








£<
•a-
•
o
rH
X
Cd
rH
U

>,
U
rH
iH
CO










€
cd
o
rH







ft*
CM
rH








&•$
r-.
CO




^e
rH
in




o
\o
1
CO S
OD Of
•a-




id
0
rH
4J
3
rH
3
Q
E
cd
5 *
CO
X rH
td u
rH
U










1
0
rH
Vi E
cd cd
cu o
C -H
>.
g 3
3
>»
«fl
rH
U






*< 84
rH 
CM rH








fr* ir-S
rH OO
co 

•a
<-> (2
c S
a co
-H E
vi -a «
cd e o
> -H rH
U-l
JS rl
w ts cu
3 E rH
I-H cd co
30 3
Q rH Q
•a
c
>
-a
S
td
CO
cd
00 B
CU Cd
E 0
O -H
CO
G
o
•H
4J
ttj
U
-H
«M
^H
CO
CO
cd
,_f
a

a>
fun*
5
T3

T3
rH
CU
-•
g
>
X CD
cu C
C2
OJ iH
Vl fe
0)
3 >.
* J3
<0
C >>
O 
•H H
Vi 3
O CO
rH
CO -H
•s o
O CO
»H
Vi  4J
CU C
J3 -H
4-1
C
MH O
°^
CO CU
 T3 X
j-t C ja
ao cd
TH -0
cu cd cu
f ii r*
3 4J p*
cd o
0) -O rH
J3 QJ
•w c >
0 0
fl -rl T3
O •"-•
3 CO
TJ 43 Cd
CU -H
CO Vl CU
Cfl 4J i-H
43 W 60
•H C
Q> TJ cd
T3 -H
cd cu vi
e N t-i
•H
0 CO rH
v> cd
0 0 VI
3 rH 3
U -V
CO -r) X
C -u 0
O M H
•rl Cd
4-> Q. 
-------
      Figure B-2.    Textural triangle of soil particle fractions for the
                    classification of soil samples.  Sample locations
                    are indicated by an asterix.  Textural triangle is
                    from USDA references (1962).
Sand
     Percent Clay
       by Weight
Percent Silt
  by Weight
             90   80     70    60   50    40    30   20    10

                          Percent Sand by Weight
             Sample 1; Duluth loam, 22"-36", B22t
             Sample 2; Duluth loam, 18"-38", B22t
             Sample 3; Duluth loam, 49"-60", B3
             Sample 4; Duluth variant, 52"-60", I1B3
             Sample 5; Dusler loam; 17"-28", B21t
             Sample 6; Omega loamy sand, 22i'38", B31
    See Table B-3
    for classifications
                            8-4-14

-------
result of high  silt  content (except in  the  Duluth Variant loamy fine sand
sample where no comparison is possible).

     The -degree  to which the six substratum samples  represent all compar-
able horizons on  the mapped areas of  Duluth and  Busier soils has not been
established.  It  appears,  however,  that substratum textural limitations to
the use  of  septic absorption fields in  the  surveyed  portion of Windermere
Township may  be more  restrictive than would be  expected  based  on typical
soils classification  -definitions.
                                  B-4-15

-------

-------
                  Appendix C
C-l.    Methods and Results  of  the Septic Leachate  Survey.



C-2.    Well Testing Data
                                                                             c
                                                                             o
                                                                             o
                                                                             IH
                                                                             c
                                                                             M

                                                                             00
                                                                             B
                                                                             as
                                                                             0)
                                                                             H
                                                                             •O
                                                                             C
                                                                             CO


                                                                             >>


                                                                             5
                                                                             n)
                                                                             JC
                                                                             u
                                                                             u
                                                                             •1-1
                                                                             en





                                                                             o




                                                                             Q




                                                                             Hi

-------

-------
              Appendix C-l.
METHODS AND RESULTS OF THE SEPTIC LEACHATE SURVEY

-------

-------
            Methods


     The Septic  Leachate Detector System's  operational  functions  are out-
lined  in  the  following  description,  excerpted  from  the  manufacturer's

operations manual:


     •    The  ENDECO  Type 2100  Septic Leachate Detector  System  is a
          portable  field  instrument  that   monitors  two  parameters;
          fluorescence  (organic  channel)  and  conductivity (inorganic
          channel).   The system  is  based   on  a stable  relationship
          between  fluorescence and  conductivity in  typical  leachate
          outfalls.   Readings  for   each  channel  appear  visually  on
          panel meters  while  the  information is recorded on  a self-
          contained strip chart recorder.   Recording modes are  select-
          able between  individual channel outputs  or  a  combined  out-
          put.   The  combined  output is  the arithmetic  result of  an
          analog  computer  circuit   that  sums  the  two  channels  and
          compares  the   resultant signal  against  the background  to
          which the  instrument was  calibrated.  The  resultant output
          is expressed  as a  percentage  of  the  background. Also,  the
          combined recorded  output  is automatically adjusted  for slow
          background changes.  The system can be operated from  a small
          boat enabling an  operator  to continuously scan an expansive
          shoreline at  walking pace  and, through  real time  feedback,
          effectively  limit  the  need  for   discrete  grab samples  to
          areas showing  high probability of  effluent leaching.   Expen-
          sive  laboratory  time  for  detailed  nutrient  analysis  is
          greatly reduced while  survey accuracy is increased  substan-
          tially	

     •    The Septic Leachate  Detector System consists of the  subsur-
          face   probe,   the  water intake  system,  the logic analyzer
          control unit,  panel meters and the  strip chart recorder...

     •    The probe/wand is submerged along  the shoreline.   Background
          water plus  groundwater seeping  through the  shore bottom  is
          drawn into the  subsurface  intake  of the  probe  and  is lifted
          upwards  to the  analyzer unit by a battery operated,  submer-
          sible pump...

     •    Upon  entering  the analyzer  unit  the solution  first passes
          through  the  fluorometer's  optical  chamber where a continuous
          measurement is  made of the  solution's narrow  band response
          to UV excitation.   The solution  then flows through a  conduc-
          tivity measurement  cell.    An  electrode-type  conductivity/
          thermistor  probe  continuously  determines  the  solution's
          conductivity.    The  solution exits   the  conductivity  cell
          directly  to   the  discharge  where  discrete  samples  may  be
          collected  if   indicated by the  response  of  the leachate
          detector.   Both parameters are  continuously  displayed  on
          separate  panel  meters.    Zero  controls  are  provided  for  both
                               C-l-1

-------
           parameters  (organic and  inorganic)  to enable "dialing out"
           the  background characteristics  to provide maximum sensiti-
           vity,  as well  as enhancing  the  response caused  by  a sus-
           pected  abnormality.   Span  controls  are also  provided  to
           control  the sensitivity  for  each  parameter separately during
           instrument calibration...
     •     The  signals generated  and displayed on the panel  meters are
           also  sent to  an  arithmetic/comparator analog computer cir-
           cuit designed  to  detect  changes in the ratio  of  organics and
           inorganics  typical of septic  leachate.   The  output of this
           circuitry  is  recorded continuously  on a  strip chart and is
           the key  indicator of a suspected  leachate outfall.  However,
           isolated  increases  in  either  parameter may be  cause for
           concern  and should be sampled for analysis for  other poten-
           tial forms of  nutrient pollution.

     The  magnitude of  the  signal  outputs and  of the synthesized "combined
output"  when detecting  an  effluent plume  is  subject  to  many non-instru-
mental  factors related  to  variable dilution  of effluents  in  lake water.
Interference  with  the survey  could potentially be caused  by  overland or
sub-surface  flow of water  bearing  large amounts of organic  substances  such
as would  be the case with barnyard runoff or with water moving out of a bog
or  marsh.  Additionally, rapidly  changing  wind conditions may change the
ambient  water  quality of  the lake  by introducing waters from the deeper
zones of  the lake  which also  contain  large amounts of organic substances.
Therefore,  detailed field  notes and  subsequent map analysis  of recorded
data are necessary parts  of  the  survey design.  Expert  interpretive ana-
lysis is  required  to  deduce the significance  of an increase in instrument
signal output under such changing  conditions.

     The  Septic  Leachate Survey  of Island,  Sturgeon,  Rush, and Passenger
lakes  was completed  during  the  period of  2-9  October 1981.   The  survey
covered  the  developed  shorelines of Sturgeon,  Island,  Rush, and Passenger
lakes and was  conducted  from a  12 foot boat with  a 20 horsepower outboard
motor.   The  boat was  operated at  its  lowest speed  (approximately 0.5 to 1
mph) as  near as possible  to the  shore.  An electrically  powered trolling
motor was used  in  waters too  shallow  for  the  outboard motor.  Dense colo-
nies of   emergent  aquatic  plants  occasionally  prevented  scanning  along  a
course closely parallel with  the shoreline.   Paths  leading through these
dense stands  to mooring  areas near houses were utilized to approach the
shore for surveying such areas.   Sampling was always performed as close as
                                C-l-2

-------
 possible to  the  shoreline  to  minimize the  effects  of dilution  and  wave/
 current disruption of emergent  effluent plumes.

      During  scans  the detector's  meters  were adjusted  to maximum  sensi-
 tivity.  Adjusting  the meters  to maximum  sensitivity  requires a greater
 emphasis on operator real-time  interpretation of  recorded  signals,  but also
 increases the likelihood  of detection of effluent plumes.

      During most  scans the instrument was  set to record  data on  the  com-
 bined signal output  mode.   This setting provides automatic adjustment  for
 changing background  levels  of  fluorescence or conductivity,  but   still
 records the  short-term increases indicative  of  localized sources such as
 effluent plumes.   It also  permits  the operator to pay greater attention to
 observing possible sources and  to  recording observations.   Prior  to  scann-
 ing  the shoreline, the instrument  was calibrated by  recording fluorescence
 along a  transect  to  mid-lake  (no  signal  expected  above background)  and
 along a developed shoreline  (varying  signals expected) .   These  calibration
 checks  enable the instrument to  be used throughout the entire lake without
 futher  adjustment,  and thus allows relative comparisons to  be made between
 plume readings.

      One particularly  useful  feature of  the Septic  Leachate Detector  for
 sample  collection  is  the  nearly instantaneous flow-through  and signal
 recording of  water samples.  This  feature provides for precise  location of
 a  plume's center  and  recording  of  the sample's  fluorescence  or combined
 signal  as it  is being collected.  After  effluent  plumes were located, water
 quality  samples were collected from  the meter's  discharge.  In  the labora-
 tory  these  samples were analyzed  for:

      •    Nitrate, nitrite, and  ammonia nitrogen
     •    Total phosphorus,  pH,  alkalinity,  and   Methylene Blue Active
          Substances
     •    Fecal coliform bacteria concentration.

     For  most samples,  analysis of  all parameters  except  fecal coliform
bacteria was  begun  within 24 hours at  the WAPORA, Inc.  Cincinnati labora-
tory.   One  group  of samples arrived  3  days  late  at  the lab, exceeding  the
                               C-l-3

-------
 recommended holding  time.  Although the recommended time was exceeded, this
 delay  is not  expected  to have  altered the  levels  of  total  nitrogen and
 total  phosphorus  measured  in the  samples.   Analyses  of  fecal coliform
 samples  were  begun within 6 hours of collection at ERA Laboratories,  Inc.,
 in Duluth, Minnesota.

     Selection  of suspected  wastewater  plumes for  sampling was  a  field
 decision  weighed  in  favor of the most  concentrated  plumes and intended to
 identify  those shoreline  areas  most seriously  affected by  the  influx of
 septic leachate.

            Results  of the Septic Leachate Survey

     Two  sources  of  positive instrument readings  were detected during the
 leachate  survey: streams and suspected wastewater  plumes.  The locations of
 these  sources  are shown  in  Figures 2-6,  2-7, 2-8, and 2-9.     A positive
 instrument  reading was recorded  when,  in  the judgement  of  the operator,
 there  was a significant  and simultaneous increase  in the flouescence and
 conductivity readings.

 Streams

     A  single  runoff water  source was  found to  be  discharging into Rush
 Lake.  No runoff  water sources were found discharging into Passenger  Lake.
 The  two   tributaries of  Island Lake produced positive combined signals on
 the leachate detector.  Intermittent localized stormwater  runoff  sources to
 Island  Lake and  Sturgeon Lake  also  produced  positive responses.   These
 positive  signals  were  always generated by rapid increases in fluorescence
 accompanied by relatively lessor  increases   in  conductivity.  The highest
 such readings  recorded were  generated  by runoff  waters entering Sturgeon
 Lake  from a  long  narrow  wetland,  the  mouth of which  is located between
groundwater  flow   stations  24 and  43.                 These  high readings
 appeared  to be caused by the flourescent products  of vegetative decay  which
 were being  released  from  the  wetland.   Runoff or stream sources of dis-
 solved organic matter, because  of their considerable volume,  are  not as
 readily diluted by lake  water as are septic leachate plumes and therefore
                               C-l-4

-------
may  cause  interference problems in  locating  nearby  septic  leachate  plumes.
High  flourescence and conductivity  readings  resulting from stream  sources
caused  interference difficulties with  effluent  plume data along  the  north
shore  of  Island  Lake  and near the public  launch  on the  north shore  of
Sturgeon Lake.

     Wave action  and currents also may  cause  localized variations in flour-
escence sometimes resulting in a natural pattern resembling closely spaced
septic plumes.  Misinterpretation from  this interference  source was  avoided
by  observing  the uniformity of conductivity measurements  and  spacing  of
lakeshore development, then disregarding detector readings  obviously caused
by wave action patterns.

Suspected Wastewater Sources

     All  non-stream related  localized  variations   in  fluorescence and/or
conductivity recorded by the leachate detector were  initially assumed  to  be
due  to wastewater percolating into  the lake  from nearby  on-site  wastewater
systems.  Typically, such  signals  were highly localized  (brief in duration
and  low  in magnitude)  compared to stream plumes.  Along  shorelines  exposed
to moderate  wave  action,  the magnitude of these signals  was generally less
because of rapid dispersion by currents.  Under calm conditions,  the magni-
tude and  duration  of  the  signals  tended to  be  greater  because  the plumes
were less rapidly dispersed.

     The number of potential effluent plumes  identified by  this survey were
not  evenly  distributed around  the   lakes.  Plume emergence appeared  to  be
strongly controlled  by factors such as land  use, topography, and  lakeshore
groundwater flow patterns  (Figures 2-6 through 2-9 )>

     A total of  39 potential septic plumes were detected, which  represents
less than  10%  of  the residences along surveyed shorelines.  During  identi-
fication of  the  17 suspected septic leachate plumes around Sturgeon  Lake,
the strengths of the instrument signals were  lessened by  the water currents
created by the high winds prevailing at the time of  the survey.   Therefore,
some additional weak or  more transient plumes may not have been  located  on
Sturgeon Lake due to these  high winds.
                               C-l-5

-------
      Not  all  plumes  located  at seasonal  residences were  fully emergent
because  the  survey  was conducted  during the  first  week of  October when
seasonal  occupancy was  low.   On the other  hand,  a  considerable amount of
precipitation  had  preceded the  survey and  would  have generally increased
the  lakeward flow of  groundwater.   Thus, while  this survey  may not have
located the  septic leachate plumes from all seasonal homes it probably did
detect  all  lakeward  moving  plumes  generated by   permanent  residences.
Permanent  residences  with on-site systems have  the  greatest potential
pollutional  significance due  to the fact  that  they  contribute waste flows
year  round,  whereas  seasonal  residences only do so for parts of the  summer
season.

             Results of the Chemical and Bacterial Analyses

      During  the  onshore  portion of the  septic  leachate  survey, background
groundwater  quality  samples were gathered for  comparison with groundwater
samples taken directly  from the centers of  onshore effluent plumes.  These
data  are presented in Tables  C-l, C-2, and C-3.

      One small discharge of runoff water was found entering into the north
side  of Rush Lake, but was not  sampled.   Analytical  water quality results
of  influent stream  samples  collected  near  the  perimeters of  Island  and
Sturgeon Lakes are shown in TableC-l  .   These  data  indicate that incoming
streams were not  contaminated  by  septic leachate.   The  relatively high
fecal  coliform  counts made  in  samples  of the runoff and streamwater are
probably associated  with extensive habitat  utilization  by resident water-
fowl  in  backwater areas or with runoff  from pastures  or barnyards.  The
stream influence points  and pastures or barnyards are shown in Figures -2-6
through 2-9.

     Nitrate  levels  in  runoff  or  streams were always  found  to  be below
                                         •
detection limits.  Total phosphorus also was low and ammonia concentrations
were  consistent with those to be expected  from wetland areas where decaying
vegetation is present.
                              C-l-6

-------
                                       §      §
                                                            e
                                                            o
                                                     8    3
  M
  0)
  u
  rt
  cu
  o
  3
  10
O  (0 !0
W  O V
w  wa M «
o    am
o  « o e

«>  -j a. u
JC ••*
u  «
gg 05

3-   1
                                                     o
                                                     a
                                                     o
                                                     o
                                                o
                                                o
                                           o
                                           o
  co
  00
  d
 •H
 T)
  «
  a)
  M
  o
  •M
  O
  OJ
  4J

 •8
 •3
 fl
 a)
 a. 

     —I 91
     
                                              a


                                              S

                                              3

                                              e
                                              o
                                              11
                                              90
                                              Li
                                              S
     0) -H
     *j •--.
     .


                        "s!
                                                                                       a
                                                                                       •a
                                                                                V
                                                                                M

                                                                                3
                                                                                U
                                                                               •s^

                                                                                V


                                                                               2

 I

0
                         — o
                         a •
      J -J5
     £
     a
                                                                                               a
                                                                                               w

                                                                                              I
                                                                                              I
                                            C-1-7

-------




(U
^
,3
|wj
r^
§
i-l
co
H
10
43
4J
1*
Q
4-1

(0
'JO
c
- 4
•Fl
•o
to
0)
M

V-i
O
4J
U
CD
U
Q>
•a
>
4J
1-t •
i-l CO
cd a>
cr 3
, «H
s-« a.
0)
4-1 eg
IT* j_i
CQ ^J
HB rri
S «
U-l CJ
o rt
 a.
U| A)
p^ U^
CO
r-l
(S "W
CJ O
•r(
U»%^
r^*
>\ CD
u
V
t, ,-v | >.
O M Cl *>
*J r-i 3 -H
U ffl tj >
W U S ^-1
M {O O U
go

01 T4 1
*J 4J 01
a a u
£ i-l H O
•J 41 3 01
a as a c
« *-*• 4-t «
J a, u
.oi m\or^. co
— »QCM -
^
w
u
*~*

to o'
^H ™* U
23c3
O r- i
H-2^
< g
^^
V
i **
Osg- So r^-a-fi. -*or> ao 4
i-t
!
b
n
n\o^ -^..rcsi\o .jft-^tn (*ia\o^ **
3-1 ... . * . - * • ... y
cOJ ^sO'O i-O \O \O %O ^D \O sO m i^> 0>
V
o
QJ
Ll -1
o -.
•H £ Oi
a a. i
4J B «
o 3 a
H £^

ff»r-»^4 -^5^—1 ^cn^u r^c^M
aoaoo oevo ocvO in-j'O
ooo -^oo odd odd
u
• Hi
k. U
0) -H
'IH --^
S Z

1 M
J S

^^
a -H
•*! Z
U 1
u ec
•H g
as ^~-

^->
U *"*
•u •^««.
a ~z
±4 i
si
S
r-.c>Jf»- ?nes^ vO^f'J a*.MO *a
_«,•>< -^ !M-^rtl CN«M-^ 3-H--^ C
... .*• ».« «*. 3
OOO OOO OOO OOO O

ac
1
«
(Amin ininin minm inmin c
OOO OOO OOO °,°,P, "3
ddd doo ooo ooo a
w
a
Q
O
^>Ain moin »ninm eM—*in I
ooo O-HO ooo — i ^o o i
ddd o«o ooo ooo g
zH ^
a.
(•J O « 9»
fvj <\| -H -^ O
TJ t3 13 -O 4-i
. c • c • e . s a.
0) a U flSb =3 3 U -0 3 B
UW33 JOO ^9O J3<3
31 3.
4-1 >
at
-i S
X v
3 -•
1* -*
a. a
a. -J
< =
v)Li4-i u3u*j v3uw v:uv^ I
^QMU 2C^)J £03) (J 3Q3J ^
j ^ i= j j J? = D j j* g -j 3 j; § JJ c!
OVa*' O03" 3UD" O-J3J4J 3
— M »-* aj — i rt 4-4 -JJ -- fl 4-4 . U »— sj p~  a
W ^j "H
O •> -C
4J -i-< O
•^* a v
•H O V"
o a
o h
u o
O u
U
« -o «
4-4 O «•>
&-4-I «l
b T3
a Q. u
w
V cd
C £
J -1 o
« K K
n g a
at) -a 4-1





90
« e
00-4-1
M -a
4 Q
S «
3 "
•H it
' 5
W 4J
O -H
•w a>
u O
> S
»J 3
•H -H
= »•
0 4J
•H e
> si
3
— —4
—t  PI
£
3
«J
S
f*.
-O
V

O
-y
_l
W O — 'o
vi3 !••% f-» n


o
M
u
3
OS
•a
3
4J
U
•)
r-l
o r» » o
.c >c> -*o u
u u y — '
S 33
O C
y o
e
3 -B
5
I 4J
1 ii
T3
ff
3
O
sfl
J4
O
SE
33
"
r->
O

-------




vi /-» I >•
O 41 U "
3—13 —
u a -o >
a? y c •*<
gw o-
0 
Ca .H >
_ *J W !0
O nj « a
0) jC r- Vi «l
Ml U V 3 U
r41 « a: o e
H d) *— iH U
3 3 e«. S
J_J
4-J
en
2 -ill
J- a a o
4J y  *••

^en 00-"OO> o*l*fi -^-HI^
O^l «rf-«Te>jr^ sf^oi — < 00 <*>
fifsi ^a-cvcnoi c*in C>ICNJ»-S
SS'o'
-H i-l O
o 353
(U 0 ^
JJ H <5 -•
orH.^ sro
2 "^ oj r^sO>! sO >O O>0 >O >Xi *0
U
C8 CD
.
P- 1?
40) i a
01 03 .15
>, > In
30) a
o* > •*
j^
M 3 ^
0) to -
1 1 •*-»
CS 0) Z
* •* M
<3 S
4-i i t



rn-^-- -a- -^ \o — « cn\o-H •fl'xO-H
"flO OOOO -if^O mrMO

odd oooo ooo -100


^-^r^ xO9«OiO NOCM^O (TscMO
— I-.OJ CM -H — -J M — — — i -« —
odd o o o c • ooo ooo


inintn inminm »ninin invnm
ooo oooo ooo ooo
odd oooo ooo ooo



in*n*n -*in»nao omin -nin*n
OOO -»OO-Jr tMOO OOO
odd csooo ooo ooo
^-N
0 "S?
^ o"* ^n «»^ o *n o
U)> •
•a s^ ^^ "3 Tl
. C > V • C • C
«3U S-OTJr-i 33 Vi 33 U
woo *>eca. uo 3 -i o o
Ull«»l «33 a U)l»»J wu*"
uj n u so 3 50 y u M y u
3 j! g g 3 w u a 3 j! S u 3 ^ S -J
aygw OaOaOtJ OO3*J 003*^
— O M a -ij^jiSJ) —a-ia .-a—ij
au2QOiC] CbO'J3J^ AP93.2 ELEQ2u9
a 3 >-* ^
u hiaQ2Ca.-J vi v>
an a n
u o ti u
z .— .z ^>z ^.z /^
a 09 a oo
&t rs o\ o>
H js - ; - — —
td co
JJ 13 bi 1^ Vi VI
R 3 AI 5) 3) 5;
 J3
so o 3 o a
C tJ ^1 W *J
^5 3 S S
rV% ~*
• s
1 Q «=•
CJ » e

CO u en
H 5
00 «O 00 O>
1 1 •§ "8
«> w *J w
u u u u
U U V V
*J F-l — -H
SOLO'S — • 
«| V-H
SO'H
41 09
V lH O
 esj **i g «AJ ao
, °5
1 «ol
5 i-ts
ft S o
so n >n e i a. u
rj r^ n <8 O
r— — . M 30 w
e u
3> J3 i* 41
jd eg vi w
« v, 3 01
,j oo -a -a
ooo
T3
<»
*l
OJ •
^1 00
•~! u a
O 3D1-I
o o Vi-a
-i a 01
oil a JB a
. -1 O Vi
o a. so
S -4 «
3 '3
w *^
Vi W
Vi C -1
V «J 01
*J O O
O vO O QUO.
... j w
SO, 05 QJ PJ UJ
<• * j«: -3 o
«
-. s-o
o o
!L| ^4
U-, VI
3)
V. >, C.
O 1—1
lA — 1— w u 90
... 0 0 S
O \0 -J D -<
w 1. Vj
U -rt 3
a -a -a


-T O **
-• o o

d — d
w
U -0
*J u
39 w
ooo -o 51
-< — -• c c.
... 3 39
OOO O 3
w a .
30 0)
a a
T3 O 3
t) VI -H
w u. a.
S
IA in m c u "
°.°.° -a s s
OOO 3 .C 3
" a — i
C C u-l
O 3 UJ
U 01
i-. c*j tn i u u
m m o j <-• *"
... on
ooo t) » *
3 ^ i s
3js I a = v 3
y 3 jd 3 --i --
-i 13 — q o e c.
b. 3 a. — i- -i
30 0 »
U -1 =
3 -a > »>
at ai 3
z ^ w e -i
—1 Q -H (M
» e ••"
en *H » a

§0 »
^ *J
^2 o e J3
3 U 3 O
w C 3
S '-S^i
1 u
* ' SI
7 ?' 3
u a a a
u o o a.
V Vi 8
^ 09 Vi 3
-j j! ii a
^4 r^ iT 3 y *J
3\ 3\ 3\ 0 a =3 
-------
     Analyses of samples collected at locations of nine septic plumes which
were strongly detected  are presented in Tables C-2   and  C-3.   These water
quality  or  "chemical"   sampling   locations  are  depicted  in   Figures  2-6
through -2*9.    Three  subsamples  were  obtained  from  each  sampled  plume:

     •    Lake water  collected  either by grab sample or directly from
          the detector  overflow  while  the  probe  was  held  within an
          emergent  plume.   (Indicated  as  either   "lake  sample"  or
          "detector" respectively in Tables  C-2 and  C-3.
     •    Groundwater  sampled   on  shore  directly  from  the effluent
          plume center using a portable well point
     •    Groundwater background  sample collected  onshore  at  a dis-
          tance from the apparent plume; data used for comparison with
          groundwater plume parameters.

     When  a  strong  plume  of  probably  septic origin  was  encountered,  a
sample was collected  directly  from the flow-through outlet of the leachate
detector.  Groundwater  samples  were collected at  20-foot  intervals  in a
transect made along the shoreline perpendicular to the plume flow direction
and a portion of  each sample was then injected into the detector to deter-
mine relative levels  of fluorescence and conductivity.  The device used to
collect  the  samples  was  a small-diameter  well  point, slotted  along  its
pointed  end,  with a  hand-operated  pump  attached.   After  identifying  the
approximate groundwater plume  location,  two  samples  were  collected:  one
from the approximate  plume center and one  from the  interval characterized
by  the  lowest  instrument  readings.   The  latter sample  functioned as  a
measure of groundwater background levels.

     All samples of groundwater and surface water showed measurable levels
of ammonia nitrogen  (mg-N/1)  which in no  case exceeded a value of 0.30 mg
ammonia  -N/l.   No  significant differences were noted in  comparisons of
ammonia concentrations  from stream  influx, lake water,  or  groundwater in
plumes.  Thus, either the on-site  systems  which were  studied  are effect-
ively  transforming ammonia to  the  oxidized  nitrogen  form,   nitrate,  or
ambient ammonia nitrogen  levels in surface waters were seasonally high due
to  the  decomposition  of  plant  material  of  the  fall season.   If  higher
ammonia levels had been detected in groundwater or in plumes emerging into
the lake  than in  runoff  or streams, this  would have  indicated rapid off-
                              C-1-10

-------
 shore  transport of incompletely  treated  leachate.   This was not  the  case.
 largely  due  to the probable  presence of naturally elevated ammonia  levels
 during  the fall  survey,  data  are inconclusive with  regard to  the  pollu-
 tional significance of  ammonia  from on-site  systems.

     Fecal  coliforms  were detected  at  all four of  the suspected  septic
 plume  water  quality sampling stations  on Island Lake.   Measurable coliform
 counts also  were found in  the  onshore  groundwater leachate  plumes at  samp-
 ling stations  C67,  C70, and  C75.   The  fecal coliform count of  2,300  orga-
 nisms  per milliliter  (C67)  reported  for the groundwater  plume  at  flow
 station  19 could have  indicated  the  presence of septic  leachate.   However,
 the  data are  insufficient to  preclude the  possibility of non-human  fecal
 material being  the source of  the  organisms that were found.  Dogs  or water-
 fowl can also  introduce fecal  coliform organisms into  the soil  surface and
 water table aquifer through their  fecal material.  A background groundwater
 sample collected  at a distance from  the plume center  (C66) also  contained
 measurable fecal coliforms,  as did  the  sample (C65)  which was  collected
 from the detector overflow.   Fecal coliforms in the latter sample  were very
 low  in concentration  and  therefore not clearly associated with  the suspec-
 ted plume.

     Except  for  the  stream  sample  (C85) described  earlier, none of the
 Sturgeon Lake samples contained measurable fecal coliform counts.   No  fecal
 coliforms  were  found   in  the  groundwater samples collected  at  Rush and
 Passenger  Lakes.  One  of  the  samples collected  from Rush Lake via the
detector  overflow had  a  measurable, but very  small  coliform count;  thus,
 the sample was not clearly associated with the suspected plume.

     Nitrite concentrations  in  all samples  were below  the  limit  of detec-
 tion (0.05 mg  -N/l).   Nitrites  in  measurable  quantities could  have  been
 present  in the  samples collected on  9  October  1981,  but  the acceptable
holding  time for this group  of samples was  exceeded by  3 days.  Three  days
 is  sufficient  time for nitrites  to  transform to nitrates  via oxidation.

     Nitrate levels in  the samples were consistently low and of an order of
magnitude which naturally  occurs  in  groundwater not  contaminated by  human
                                C-l-11

-------
activities.   The highest detected concentration, 2.4 rag -N/l, was found in
a  groundwater background sample collected near a suspected septic plume in
Sturgeon Lake.   It was  evident  that during the time of the survey, elevated
concentrations  of nitrate  were not being introduced to  any  of the lakes.

      In  general,  phosphorus  concentrations  measured  in  samples  taken in
suspected  on-shore effluent  plumes  were high  (Tables  C-*2 and C-3).    Se-
veral  values measured  over  1.0  mg  total dissolved  P  per liter  with the
highest  value  measured at  1.5 mg  total dissolved  -P  per   liter  in the
groundwater  plume.   The  observed  low levels  of this nutrient  in samples
collected  from  these   plumes at  their points  of  emergence  into  the lake
(called  "detector" sample  in Tables C-2 and C-3)    indicates that a  large
percentage of the phosphorus  of human origin was being removed by the  soil,
precluding entry to  the lake.  The  total -P data indicate little signifi-
cant  influx  of  phosphorus from the suspected plumes during the time of the
su rvey.

     The pH range of all samples measured in the laboratory was 5.5 to 7.1,
with  only  three values lower than 6.0.   The highest and lowest total  alka-
linity values,   130 and 23 mg/1 CaCO ,  respectively, were found  in Island
Lake.

     Methylene  Blue  Active Substances  (MBAS)  are  those organic substances
which form a quantitative reaction product with methylene blue which can be
measured by a standard  analytical method.  The MBAS of most significance to
water quality  is linear alkylate sulfonate  (LAS), which is an anionic sur-
factant used to  make  detergents and  other  cleaning products.   High MBAS
concentrations  are indicative  of detergent contamination.   Ten samples,
mostly from suspected wastewater plumes,  were analyzed for MBAS.  Only four
of the samples  showed  detectable levels, and  these  levels do not indicate
significant detergent contamination.
                             C-l-12

-------
             Appendix C-2.
WELL-WATER QUALITY DATA FOR PINE AND CARLTON
          COUNTIES, MINNESOTA

-------

-------
              Well-water quality data for Pine and Carlton Counties.   Information
              was  obtained in 1979, 1980 and 1981 (Minnesota Department  of  Public
              Health, unpublished).
                                       1979
Well
Number
County
  Well
Depth(ft)
Static
Water
Level(ft)
Nitrates
(mg/1)
Caliform
Bacteria(MPN)
Specific
Conductivity
(Umhos/cm)
Fluoride
ag/1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
p"
cb
C
c
c*
p
p
p
c
p
c
c
p
?
p
p
c
94
52
90
117
210
' 145
112
105
62
155
300
175
80
95
66
60
64
42
26
42
6
15
32
28
24
14
21
92
10
45
33
3
8
14
<0.4
<0.4
<0.4
<0.4
<0.4
<0.4
5.3
<0.4
<0.4
<0.4
<0.4
<0.4

< 0.4
3.0
< 0.4
< 0.4
<2.2
16.0
9.2
<2.2
<2.2
<2.2
-<2.2
<2.2
<2.2
<1.0
<2.2
>2.0
<2.2
<2.2
<2.2
<2.2
<2.2
                                                          resampled
                                        < 0.4
                                            <2.2
                                        C-2-1

-------
            Well-water quality data for Pine and Carlton Counties (continued).
                                   1980
Well
Number
  18
  19
  20
  21
  22
  23
  24
  25
  26
  27
  28
  29
  30
  31
  32

  33
  34
  35
  36
  37
  38
  39

  40
  41
  42
County
  P
  P
  P
  P
  P
  P
  C
  c
  **
  P
  P
  P
  P
  P
  P
   *
  P
  P
  P
  P
  P
  P
  P

  P
  P
  P
           Static
  Well     Water
Dep_th(ft).  Level (ft)  Nitrates
                                   Specific
                     Caliform      Conductivity
                     Bacteria(MPN)  (vmhos/cm)
  155
   50
   95
   90
   91
   80
  185
  170
   95
  230
   43
   50
  163
  275
   50

  300
  125
  110
  155
  144
  126
  102

   96
   90
   45
 36
 14
 32
 16
 13
 15
 25
 52
 50
 33
"10
 11
 56
 18
  4

 66
100
 45
 24
  5
 27
 17

 41
 16
<0.4
<0.4
<0.4
<0.4
<0.4
<0.4
<0.4
<0.4
<0.4
<0.4
<0.4
<0.4
 0.72
<0.4
<0.4
<0.4
<0.4
<0.4
<0.4
<0.4
<0.4
<0.4

<0.4
<0.4
 1.4
<2.2
<2.2
<2.2
<2.2
<2.2
<2.2
<2.2
<2.2
<2.2
<2.2
<2.2
<2.2
<2.2
<2.2
2,2
<2.2 resampled
<2.2
<2.2
<2.2
<2.2
<2.2
<2.2
2.2
<2.2 resampled
<2.2
<2.2
>2.0
190
350
480
330
320
170
300
300
370
230
270
320
370
340
190
240
300
370
190
	
310
300
240
	
390
279
254
Fluorid^
mg/1
 0.10
 0.15
 0.14
 0.12
 0.10
 0.12
 0.24
 0.20
 0.14
 0.22
 0.14
 0.18
 0.20
 0.13
 0.10
 0.10
 0.62
 0.26
 0.13
 0.50
 0.13
 0.24
 0.14

 0.18
 0.12
 0.12
                                        C-2-2

-------
            Well-water quality  data for  Pine and Carlton Counties (concluded),
                                     1981
Well
Number
County
           Static                              Specific
  Well     Water                Caliform       Conductivity  Fluoride
Depth (ft).  Level (ft)  Nitrates  Bacteria (MPN)  (vmhos/cm)    tng/1
43
44
45

46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
P*
P*
P

P*
P
P
P
P
P
C
P
C*

p
p
P
C
C
138
64
176

105
66
50
113
105
181
538
115
78
125
160
165
171
217
43
24
26
50

21
23
13
41
12
49
77
21
32
28
40
42
35
70
30
<0.4
<0.4
<0.4

<0.4
<0.4
<0.4
0.92
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.88
<0.4
<0.4
<0.4
<0.4
<0.4
<0.4
1.1
<2.2
<2.2
5.1
<2.2 re sampled
<2.2
>2.0
>2.0
<2.2
<2.2
<2.2
<2.2
<2.2
<2.2
>2.0
<2.2
<2.2
<2.2
<2.2
<2.2
280
280
146
	
300
250
110
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
0.18
0.26
0.12
	
0.18
0.1
0.1
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
P  = Pine County
P  = Carlton County
*  = indicates well was located in Windemere  Township
                                       C-2-3

-------

-------
              Appendix D
to
E
(U
                                                                         C
                                                                         0)
                                                                         8
                                                                         a)
                                                                         00
Design  Criteria and  Component Options for

Centralized Wastewater Management Systems
4-1
tn
cd


•o
0)
N
                                                                         &
                                                                          (0
                                                                          C
                                                                          o
                                                                          4-1
                                                                          C
                                                                          8
                                                                          o
                                                                          I-
                                                                          13
                                                                          d
                                                                          cd
                                                                          tu
                                                                          4-1
                                                                          •H
                                                                          N
                                                                          O

                                                                          (3
                                                                          00
                                                                          «H
                                                                          to
                                                                          
-------

-------
          Wastewater Load Factors

     Wastewater  flow  projections  for  each  project  alternative  for  the
Island Lake  and Sturgeon  Lake areas were  developed based  on a projected
year 2000 design  population (Section 3.2.1.3), an average  daily base flow
(ADBF) of  45  gallons  per  capita  per  day  (gpcd)   for  individual  systems
served by  holding tanks and  60 gpcd for all other  services,  and a design
infiltration of  10 gpcd  for gravity sewers  (based  on  maximum permissible
infiltration  rate of  200  (gallons per  inch-diameter  per mile  per  day).

     The organic  loads  were projected on the basis  of  the accepted design
values of  0.17 pounds of BOD   per  capita per day and 0.20  pounds  of sus-
pended solids  (SS)  per  capita per day (ten state standards).  These values
                                                  /
were applied to the projected year 2000 population.

          Effluent Requirements

     The Minnesota  Pollution Control Agency  (MPCA)  issued  effluent limits
for the  City of  Moose Lake wastewater treatment  facility,  as presented in
Section 2.1.

          Economic Factors

     The economic cost  criteria consist of  an  amortization  or planning
period from  the present  to the  year 2000, or approximately  20 years;  an
interest rate  of 7.625%, and  service lives of 20 years  for treatment  and
pumping  equipment,  40 years  for structures, and  50 years  for conveyance
facilities.  Salvage values were estimated using straight-line depreciation
for items that could be used at the end of the 20-year planning period.   An
annual appreciation  rate  of 3% over the planning period was used to calcu-
late the salvage  value  of the land.  Operation and maintenance (O&M)  costs
include labor, materials, and utilities (power).  Costs associated with the
treatment works,  pumping  stations,  solids handling and disposal processes,
conveyance  facilities,  and  on-site systems are based  on prevailing rates.
                             D-l

-------
         Costs are based  on the USEPA STP Construction Cost  Index of 410.9,  the

    USEPA Complete Urban  Sewer System  (CUSS)  Construction Cost  Index of 193,

    and  the Engineering News  Record  (ENR)  Construction Cost Index of 3,370  for

    the  first  quarter of  1982  (March   1982  for Minneapolis  MN).  The  total

    capital cost includes  the  initial construction  cost plus a service  factor.

    The  service factor includes costs for engineering,  contingencies, legal  and

    administrative,  and  financing.   The service  factors  used   for  different

    alternative components  are summarized  in  Table D-l.    The  economic cost

    criteria are summarized in Table  D-2.


           System Components


           — Flow and Waste Reduction-


        Economy in the construction  and  operation of  sewage collection,  treat-

    ment,  and  disposal  facilities,   is,  in many   localities,  achieveable  by

    controlling waste  flows or the  amounts  of impurities carried  in the  sewage.

    This  economy  is  generally  recognized  in the short-term monetary  savings

    that  result from  the  reduced design  capacities of facilities or from  the

    long-term  savings   realized  when  facility expansion or replacement is  un-

    necessary.   Other  savings  can be  achieved throughout the life of the  facil-

    ities from  reduced  operational  costs.


        Methods  of flow and  waste  reduction considered  for use in the  study

   area include water  conservation measures and waste  segregation.
Table. D-l.   Service factor
Item

Contingencies
Engineering
Legal & Administrative
Financing
     Total
Conventional Collection
and Treatment System (%)

            10
            10
             3
            _4
            27
Pressure Sewer, Cluster,
and On-site Systems (%)

           15
           13
            3
           _4
           35
 A service factor is applied to  the construction cost to compute  the capital
 cost.  Interest during construction is not included.
          .                            _

-------
Table D-2 .  Economic cost criteria.

Item

Amortization period

Interest (discount) rate

STP construction cost index - 1st Quarter 1982

Sewer (CUSS) construction cost index - 1st Quarter
  1982

ENR construction cost index - 1st Quarter 1982

Service life
     Equipment
     Structures
     Conveyance facilities
     Land

Salvage value
     Equipment
     Structures
     Conveyance facilities
     Land
                                                         years
                                                         years
                                                         years
                                                         years
                                                                   Value

                                                                       20

                                                                    7-5/8

                                                                    410.9


                                                                      193

                                                                     3730
    20
    40
    50
permanent
                                                                        0
                                                                       50
                                                                       60
                                                                      103
          —Water Conservation Measures —


     Clean  water has  for  many  years  often been  regarded  as one  of  the

nation's  bountiful  free goods.  Concerns over water  supply  and wastewater
disposal  and  an  increasing  recognition  of  the  benefits that may  accrue

through water conservation are serving to greatly stimulate the development
and  application of  water  conservation  practices.   The diverse  array  of
water conservation  practices  may,  in general, be divided  into these major
categories:

     •    Elimination of non-functional water use

     •    Water-saving devices, fixtures, and appliances

     •    Wastewater recycle/reuse system.
                                   D-3

-------
     Non-functional  water  use is  typically  the result  of  the following:


     •    Wasteful,  water-use habits such  as using a toilet flush to
          dispose  of a  cigarette  butt, allowing  the water to run while
          brushing teeth or  shaving,  or operating  a clotheswasher or
          dishwasher with only a  partial  load

     •    Excessive water supply  pressure - for  most dwellings a water
          supply  pressure  of 40  pounds  per square  inch  (psi)  is ade-
          quate  and  a  pressure   in  excess  of this  can  result in un-
          necessary  water  use and  wastewater  generation,  especially
          with wasteful water-use habits

     •    Inadequate  plumbing and  appliance  maintenance -  unseen or
          apparently  insignificant   leaks from  household fixtures and
          appliances  can waste large  volumes of water.   Most notable
          in  this regard  are  leaking toilets  and  dripping faucets.
          For  example,  even  a  pinhole   leak which may appear as  a
          dripping faucet  can waste up   to  170  gallons  per  day at a
          pressure of  40 psi.  More severe leaks can  generate larger
          wastewater quantities.
     The  quantity  of  water  traditionally used  by household  fixtures or

appliances often  is considerably greater  than actually needed.  Typically,

toilet flushing,  bathing,  and clotheswashing collectively account for over

70% of the  household's interior water use and waste flow volume (Siegrist,

Woltanski, and Waldorf 1978).  Thus, efforts to accomplish major reductions

in  the  wastewater  flow  volume,  as well  as its  pollutant  mass,  have been

directed  toward   the  toilet  flushing,  bathing, and  clotheswashing  areas.

Some  selected  water conservation/waste load reduction  devices and systems

developed for these household activities include:
          Toilet devices and systems
               Toilet tank inserts - such as water filled and weighted
               plastic bottles, flexible panels, and/or dams
               Dual-flush toilet devices
               Shallow-trap toilets
               Very low volume flush toilets
               Non-water carriage toilets

          Bathing devices and systems
               Shower flow control devices
               Reduced -flow shower fixtures

-------
     •    Clotheswashing devices  and  systems of a  clotheswasher  with  a
          suds-saver attachment
               The suds-saver  feature is  included  as an  optional cycle
               setting  on  several  commercially  made  washers.   The
               selection of suds-saver cycle when  washing  provides  for
               storage of the  washwater from the wash  cycle  for  subse-
               quent  use as  the  wash  water  for  the  next wash  load.
               The rinse cycle remains unchanged.

Wastewater Recycle/Reuse Systems
     These  systems  provide for the  collection and processing of all house-
hold wastewater  or  the fractions produced by certain activities for subse-
quent reuse.  A  system which has received a majority of development efforts
includes  the  recycling  of bathing  and laundry  wastewater  for  flushing
water-carriage toilets  and/or outside irrigation.

Other Water Conservation Measures

     One  possible method  for reduction  of sewage flow is  the adjustment of
the price of water to control consumption.  This method normally is used to
reduce water demand  in areas with   water shortages.  It probably would not
be effective in  reducing sanitary sewer  flows because much of its impact is
usually  on luxury  water  usage,  such as lawn  sprinkling or  car  washing.
None of the luxury uses impose a load on a separated sewerage system and on
on-site systems.  Therefore, the use of  price control probably would not be
effective  in  significantly reducing  wastewater  flows.   More importantly
most of  homes in the  service  area have their own wells  and therefore are
not charged for  water use.

     Other measures  include educational  campaigns on water conservation in
everyday  living  and  the installation of pressure-reduction valves in areas
where the water pressure  is excessive  (greater than 60  pounds per square
inch).   Educational  campaigns  usually  take  the form of spot television and
radio commercials,  and the distribution of leaflets with water and sewer
bills.   Water  saving devices  must continue to be used  and  maintained for
flow reduction to be effective.
                                   D-5

-------
     Wastewater  flows  on the order of  15 to 30 gpcd can be achieved by in-
stallation of combinations of the following devices and systems:
          Replace standard toilets with dual cycle or other low volume
          toilets

          Reduce  shower water  use  by installing  thennostatic mixing
          valves and flow control shower heads.  Use of showers should
          be encouraged rather  than baths whenever possible

          Replace  older clotheswashing  machines with  those  equipped
          with  water-level  controls  or  with  front-loading  machines

          Eliminate  water-carried toilet  wastes by  use  of  in-house
          composting toilets

          Use recycled  bath  and laundry wastewaters to sprinkle lawns
          in summer

          Recycle  bath and  laundry  wastewaters for  toilet flushing.
          Filtration and  disinfection of bath  and  laundry wastes for
          this purpose has been shown  to be feasible and aesthetically
          acceptable in pilot  studies (Cohen and Wallman  1974; Mclau-
          ghlin 1968).  This is an alternative to in-house composting
          toilets that could achieve the same level of wastewater flow
          reduction

          Commercially available  pressurized  toilets  and  air-assisted
          shower heads  using a common air  compressor  of small horse-
          power  would  reduce  sewage  volume  from  these  two  largest
          household sources up to 90%.
     Methods that reduce  the flow or pollutant  loads  can provide the fol-

lowing benefits to a wastewater management program:

     •    Reduce the  sizes  and  capital costs of new sewage collection
          and treatment facilities

     •    Delay the time  when future expansion or replacement facili-
          ties will be needed

     •    Reduce the operational costs of pumping and treatment
                                   D-6

-------
      *    Mitigate the sludge and effluent disposal impacts
      •    Extend  the  life  of the existing soil absorption  system  for
           an existing system functioning satisfactorily
      •    Reduce  the wastewater  load  sufficiently  to remedy a  failing
           soil absorption system in which the effluent is surfacing or
           causing backups
      •    Reduce  the  size  of  the  soil  disposal field in  the  case of
           new on-site  systems.   However, the pretreatment  process of
           the on-site  systems  should be  maintained  at full-size  to
           provide the  necessary capacity to treat and attenuate peak
           flows.

           —Waste Segregation—

      Various methods for the  treatment  and the  disposal  of domestic wastes
 involve  separation  of  toilet  wastes from  other  liquid  waste.    Several
 toilet systems can be  used  to provide  for segregation and separate  handling
 of  human  excreta  (often referred  to  as  blackwater),  and, in some  cases,
 garbage  wastes.  Removal  of human  excreta from the  wastewater  serves  to
 eliminate  significant  quantities  of  pollutants,   particularly  suspended
 solids,  nitrogen,  and  pathogenic organisms (USEPA  1980a).

      Wastewaters  generated  by fixtures other  than  toilets  are  often refer-
 red  to  collectively as  graywater.   Characterization  studies  have  demon-
 strated  that  typical  graywater  contains appreciable quantities of  organic
 matter,  suspended  solids, phosphorus,  and grease.   The  organic  materials  in
 graywater  appear   to degrade  at a  rate  not  significantly different  from
 those  in combined residential  water.   Microbiological studies have  demon-
 strated  that  significant  concentrations  of indicator  organisms,  such  as
 total  and  fecal coliforms,  are  typically found  in graywater (USEPA  1980).

     Although  residential  graywater  does  contain pollutants  and  must  be
 properly managed, graywater may  be  simpler to manage  than total residential
wastewater due to a  reduced  flow volume.   A number of  potential strategies
 for  management of segregated human  excreta (blackwater)  and graywater are
 presented in Figure  D-l  and  Figure D-2  .  respectively.
                                    D-7

-------
Privy
                                 Human Wastes
Comoost toilet
            Disinfection
           Soil Amendnent
Very Lcw-"7o lume
  Flush Toilet
 Closed  Loop
Recycle Toilet
IncineraCD-
  Toilet
   Figure D-l.   Example strategies for the management of segregated human wastes.
                                   D-8

-------
    Soil Absorption
    Alternatives
                                  Further
                                 Treatment
                                                  _L
                                                          Surface
                                                          Watar
                                                         Discharge
Figure D-2.
Example  strategies for the  management of residential
greywater.
                           D-9

-------
BuiIding
sewer
V dia.  effluent  line
                                                                            Effluent
                                                                            sewer
                        Precast  septic tank


                          SEPTIC TANK EFFLUENT GRAVITY SEWER LAYOUT
 Figure  D-3.    Septic  tank  effluent  gravity  sewer  layout.
                                    D- 12

-------
pressurizing  inlet  points and  a single  outlet,  as shown  in Figure D-4.
The pressure  main  follows a generally direct route to a treatment facility
or to a  gravity  sewer, depending on  the  application.   The primary purpose
of this  type  of  design is to minimize  sewage retention time in the sewer.

     There are two  major types of pressure sewer systems: the grinder pump
(GP) system and  the septic tank effluent  pump  (STEP)  system.  As shown in
Figure D-5 ,  the major differences between the alternative  systems  are in
the on-site equipment  and layout.   There are also  some subtle differences
in the pressure  main design methods  and  in  the  treatment systems required
to reduce the pollutants in the collected wastewater to an environmentally
acceptable level.   Neither pressure  sewer system  alternative requires the
modification  of  household plumbing,  although neither precludes  it  if such
modifications are deemed desirable.

     The advantages of pressure sewers are primarily  related to installa-
tion costs and inherent system characteristics.   Because these systems use
small-diameter plastic pipes buried just below the frost penetration depth,
their installation  costs  can  be quite low compared to conventional gravity
systems in low-density areas.  Other  site conditions that enhance this cost
differential  include  hilly  terrain,  rock  outcropping,  and  high  water
tables.   Because  pressure sewers  are sealed conduits,  there should  be no
opportunity for  infiltration.   The  sewers can be designed  to handle only
the domestic  sewage generated  in  the houses serviced,  which excludes the
infiltration  that occurs  in most gravity systems.  The high operation and
maintenance costs  for  the  use  of mechanical  equipment  at  each point of
entry to the  system is the major disadvantage of  a pressure sewer system.

     Most of  the  dwellings in the  proposed service  area  have  existing
septic tanks.  Therefore,  the  septic tank effluent pump (STEP)  system was
considered for the centralized collection system alternatives.

          Wastewater Treatment Processes

     A variety of  treatment options were considered in  the Facilities Plan
in development of alternative wastewater management plans including:
                             D-13

-------
        Pressure sewer



	  Water main (under pressure)
©
  P ]  Pressure sewer pump





 |-|    Housing unit








Figure D-4.   Pressure sewer layout versus potable water supply layout.

-------
                                                                              C Road
                                                                            Pressure
                                                                            sewer
BuiIding
sewer
Junction box
and alarm
                     High water  level alarm
                                               To existing soil absorption system
                   Llevel
                    controls
                        Precast septic tank
                                 GRINDER PUMP LAYOUT
            r*i—Junction  box
            LJ   and  alarm
                                                                                 Road
                                                                            Pressure
                                                                            sewer
BuiIding
sewer
                                          To  existing  soil  absorption system

                                                  Hi ghwater
                                                  level
                                           Pump  ^Level     alarm
                                                  controls
                        Precast septic tank
                          SEPTIC TANK  EFFLUENT PUMP LAYOUT
    Figure D-5.   Types of pressure sewer  systems.
                                    D-15

-------
          •    use of existing lagoons
          •    activated sludge
          •    oxidation ditch.

     The  facilities  planner recommended modification  and  expansion of the
City of Moose Lake's existing lagoon system.

          Effluent Disposal Methods

     Three effluent disposal options are available:  stream discharge, land
application, and reuse.
     The Moose  Horn River is the receiving stream for discharge of treated
wastewater effluent.  The discharge is regulated by the NPDES permit issued
by MFCA.
                                D-16

-------
     Land application or land treatment of wastewater utilizes natural phy-
sical, chemical, and  biological processes in vegetation, soils, and under-
lying  formations to  renovate  and  dispose  of domestic  wastewater.   Land
application methods have  been practiced in the United States for more than
100 years and  presently are being used by hundreds of communities through-
out the nation (Pound and Crites 1973).

     In addition to  wastewater treatment, the benefits of land application
may include nutrient  recycling, timely water applications, groundwater re-
charge, and soil improvement.  These benefits accrue to a greater extent in
arid and semi-arid areas,  but are also applicable to humid areas.  Second-
ary benefits include  preservation of open space and summer augmentation of
streamflow.

     The components  of  a  land application  system include  a centralized
collection and  conveyance system, some level of primary treatment, possible
secondary treatment,  possible storage and disinfection, and the land appli-
cation site  and  equipment.   In addition, collection  of  the  treated  water
may be included  in  the system design  along  with discharge or reuse of the
collected water.  These  optional components may be necessary to meet state
requirements or to make the system operate properly.

     Land application  of municipal wastewater  for  treatment  encompasses a
wide variety of  possible  processes or methods  of  application.   The three
principal processes utilized in land treatment of wastewater are:

     •    Overland flow
     •    Slow-rate or crop irrigation
     •    Rapid infiltration.

Because there  is an  existing wastewater lagoon  system (City  of Moose Lake
system) the  construction of  a new land treatment  system would  forego any-
economic advantages  of utilizing existing  facilities  (which  would require
some  improvements).   Consequently,  land   treatment  processes  of overland
flow,  slow   rate-irrigation,   and  rapid  infiltration  were  screened  from
consideration as a centralized wastewater treatment process.
                              D-17

-------
     Wastewater management  techniques  included under  the  category of treat-
 ed  effluent  reuse may be identified as:

     •     Public water supply
     •     Groundwater recharge
     •     Industrial process uses or cooling  tower makeup
     •     Energy production
     •     Recreation and turf irrigation
     •     Fish and wildlife enhancement.

     Reuse of treatment  plant effluent  as  a  public water  supply or for
groundwater  recharge could present potential  public health concerns.  There
are no major industries in the area that require cooling  water.  The avail-
ability  of  good  quality  surface  water  and  groundwater and the  abundant
rainfall  limit  the demand  for the use  of treated  wastewater for recrea-
tional and turf  irrigation. Organic contamination  and heavy metal concen-
trations  also are  potential  problems.   Direct  reuse would require very
costly  advanced   wastewater  treatment (AWT),  and  a  sufficient   economic
incentive  is not  available  to  justify the  expense.  Thus,  the  reuse of
treated effluent  currently  is not a feasible management  technique for the
study area.

         Sludge Treatment and Disposal

     Some  of the wastewater  treatment processes considered  will generate
sludge.   The amount  of  sludge generated  will vary  considerably, depending
on  the process.   A typical sludge management program would   involve inter-
related processes  for reducing  the  volume of the  sludge (which is mostly
water)  and final disposal.

     Volume  reduction depends on  the  reduction of both  the  water and the
organic content of the sludge.  Organic material can be reduced through the
use  of  digestion,  incineration,  or  wet-oxidation   processes.   Moisture
reduction  is attainable  through concentration,  conditioning, dewatering.
                              D-18

-------
and/or drying  processes.  The  mode  of  final  disposal  selected determines
the processes that are required.  In the case of waste stabilization ponds,
the sludge  would collect in  the  bottom of the pond and  would  undergo an-
aerobic digestion.  Inert solids that are not biologically decomposed would
remain in the pond and may require cleanout and removal once every 10 to 20
years.
                                D-19

-------

-------
        Appendix E
Cost  Effectiveness Analysis
                                                                 w
                                                                •I-l
                                                                 03
                                                                 en
                                                                 CO
                                                                 01
                                                                 S
                                                                 
-------

-------
Cost Methodology

1.   Costs  for  the conventional gravity sewer collection alternatives were
     developed  from the  bids  received  in  August  1981  for  the proposed
     sewers to serve Island Lake, and from published cost data.

2.   Costs  for  the septic tank effluent pressure and gravity sewer collec-
     tion  alternatives were  developed  from the  August 1981  Island Lake
     bids,  costs  from other  project bids localized and  updated, and pub-
     lished cost-data.

3.   Costs  for  the on-site system, cluster, and bog treatment alternatives
     were developed  from  bid  costs from other  projects  localized and up-
     dated locally quoted  prices, and published cost data.

4.   Costs  for  upgrading  the  City of Moose Lake  treatment  plant were-de-
     veloped from  published cost data.

5.   Costs  for materials,  construction,  and O&M were  updated  to June 1981
     price  levels.   Construction  costs for  treatment units and sewers were
     based on USEPA indexes for Minneapolis of 410.9  (STP) and 193 (CUSS),
     respectively.   The  Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index of
     3,730 for March 25, 1982 also was used.

4.   Salvage values  were  determined using straight-line depreciation for a
     planning period of  20 years.  The land value was considered  to appre-
     ciate  by 3 percent per year.  The service life of structures, includ-
     ing  buildings,  concrete  process units,  etc., was  assumed  to  be  50
     years.  The  service  life  of process and auxiliary  equipment such as
     clarifier mechanisms, standby generators, pumps, electric motors, etc.
     was assumed to be 20 years.

7.   Capital costs  were  based  on construction costs plus  a  service factor
     for  engineering,  administration, legal and contingencies  (See  Table
     2-16 and Section 2.3.1.3.)

8.   Present worth of slavage  value,  O&M costs, and  average  annual  equi-
     valent costs  were determined  for 20 years  using a discount rate  of
     7.625%.

9.   Present worth  of  salvage  values was determined using a single payment
     present worth factor of 0.2300 (Salvage value x 0.2300 = present worth
     of salvage).

10.  Present worth of O&M costs  were determined using a  uniform or  equal
     payment series  factor of  10.0983 (average annual O&M cost x  10.0983 =
     present worth of O&M).

11.  Average annual  equivalent costs  were  determined using a capital re-
     covery factor of 0.0990 (total present worth x 0.0990 = average annual
     equivalent cost).

-------

-------
















V
>
*4


g
01
 o <^H ^*"  a 41
£§^
a) u h 8
a ea 4
B>tft *J 41 Of 4IQI
a o « s to .2 a .2 -a -2 ti
41-' o > 4i q w o> q atifl >
-H *• u 4> u n jt J u £ ,3 u jj J •H
.0 o 41 ** *H a <>JB a J e  — i 0 « a) w O O ffl O 3D 1*
— i 3 I H a -H-aw T  t> e Z io^>aM ajaw«jMMO e
9 4IOO 
-------
nt

&M
nc

An
«J  to
u  >
,9 -±
nua

ruc
             ca o <*i
             O «H so


             *^ iA O
             as rH JN
             o o o

             tn 





             88S
             c4 CM rj





             ggS
             O O O
             £33

                                                            sssssssg
             SS8
             CM ~4 CM
               ScMO«*i
   i-l              CM                         CM *n iO






 oo        ooo         ooooooooo


  •  •>         »••         •»M»B«iq*»

 .*H»BB

ix rx        sO O O         iA<*15OyS>O(v^*O'Af^4



              ***          ••••*!••**

             ^•^r-|         rHMd^F^O^^ *n



OO         OOO         OOOOOOOOO
ST tO         CMM9<4         H       r-H


oo         ooo         ooooooooo
cOsiO         ot ^^ r»         w*ti-4vo(McM<^tnr-4v0








             •HrHi-l         i«irMw^^Hfn
             l&
             5>
             a o a-    w
             c ul W
            3SS

            <« y    ^
 I  ft.    4J


 IS
                                         DUO,    U
                                                                      a J J

                                                                     . O i-l V) I
                                     5
                                     M
                                    O
 01 U
•-H 3

 0 4J
1-4 t/1


 I  I


dj
                               E-2

-------
Table E-2.  Quantities and costs for conventional gravity sewers for the north and west
            shorelines of Island Lake, and transmission to existing Sand Lake sewers.
            (Alternative 4A).
Item
Unit  Quantity
Sewer Pipe
  8"                        LF

Force main
  common trench

    3"
  individual trench
    2"

    3"
    3" Highway Crossing
Lift Station
  A 75 gpm, TDH 28 Ft
  B 60 gpm, TDH 32 ft
  C 40 gpm, TDH 26 ft
  D 25 gpm, TDH 19 ft
Auxiliary Power Units
  2 Hp
Wye
Service connection
House lead
  gravity
  grinder pump
Abandon septic tank, privy
  or holding tank

Subtotal initial cost
Service factor (27%)
Subtotal initial capital cost

Future connection cost
  Wye
  Service connection
  Houselead
    gravity
    grinder pump

Subtotal future connection cost
Annual future connection cost
                                             Unit
                                             Cost
Construction  Salvage
                                   13,900  $ 26.50
O&M
                            $368,350    $221,010  $1,043
LF
LF
LF
LF
LF
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA


it
EA
EA
EA
EA
:Ost
;t
1,060
1,540
1,200
450
2,750
1
1
1
1
1
3
88
88
86
2
88



28
28
27
1


6.50
7.50
11.50
11.80
12.70





6,300
49
140
1,000
2,850
54



49
140
1,000
2,850


6,890
11,550
13,800
5,310
34,930
36,800
25,400
22,600
22,600
22,600
18,900
4,310
12,320
86,000
5,700
4,750
702,810
189,760
892,570
1,370
3,920
27,000
2,850
35,140
1,757
4,130
6,930
8,280
3,190
20,960
22,080
7,620
6,780
6,780
6,780
5,670
2,590
7,390
51,600
1,710
^
383,500


820
2,350
16,200
860
20,230

-
—
_
-
-
—
1,710
1,700
1,510
1,480
—
-
—
_
124
w
7,567


_
—
—
62
62
3
                                       E-3

-------
Table E-3.
Quantities and costs for STE gravity sewers for the north and west
shorelines of Island Lake, and transmission to existing Sand Lake sewers,
(Alternative 4B).
Item
               Unit  Quantity
Unit
Cost
Construction  Salvage
Future connection cost
  Service connection
    STE gravity
    STE pump
  Septic tank
    new
    replace
  Building sewer

Subtotal future connection cost
Annual future connection cost
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
ost
!t
27
1
28
25
28

958
2,790
800
854
90

25,870
2,790
22,400
21,350
2,520
74,930
3,747
15,520
840
13,440
12,810
1,510
44,120
O&M
STE gravity sewer pipe
4"
6"
Manholes
Force main
common trench
2V
3"
individual trench
2"
2V
3"
3" Highway Crossing
Lift Station
A 75 gpm, TDH 28 ft
B 60 gpm, TDH 32 ft
C 40 gpm, TDH 26 ft
D 25 gpm, TDH 19 ft
Auxiliary Power Units
2 Hp
Service connection
STS gravity
STE pump
Septic tank
new + abandon privy
upgrade
replace
Building sewer
Subtotal initial cost
Service factor (35%)
Subtotal initial capital

LF
LF
EA


LF
LF

LF
LF
LF
EA

EA
EA
EA
EA

EA

EA
EA

EA
EA
EA
EA


cost

9,530
4,320
3


1,060
1,540

1,200
450
2,750
1

1
1
1
1

3

86
2

14
68
6
14




§ 16.90
18.40
1,160


6.50
7.50

11.50
11.80
12.70







6,300

958
2,790

854
175
854
90




$161,060
79,490
3,480


6,890
11,550

13,800
5,310
34,930
36,800

25,400
22,600
22,600
22,600

18,900

82,390
5,580

11,960
11,900
5,120
1,260
584,220
207,480
778,700

$96,630
47,700
2,090


4,130
6,930

8,280
3,190
20,960
22,000

7,620
6,780
6,780
6,780

5,670

49,430
1,680

7,170
7,140
3,070
760
314,790



$ 362
164
-


-
—

-
-
-
-

1,710
1,700
1,510
1,480

—

-
124

140
680
60
~
7,930


                                                                     62

                                                                    280
                                                                    342
                                                                     17
                                      E-4

-------
Table E-4.  Quantities and costs for STE pressure sewers for the north and west
            shorelines of Island Lake and transmission to existing Sand Lake sewers,
            (Alternative 4C).
.Item

STE pressure sewer pipe
  2"
  2h"
  3"
  4"
STE gravity sewer pipe
  6"
  6" Highway crossing
  Manhole
Service connection-STE pump EA
Septic tank
  new + abandon privy
  upgrade
  replace
Building sewer

Subtotal initial cost
Service factor (35%)
Subtotal initial capital cost

Future connection cost
  Service connection
    STE pump
  Septic tank
    new
    replace
  Building sewer

Subtotal future connection cost
Annual future connection cost

Unit
LF
LF
LF
LF
LF
EA
EA
. EA
EA
EA
EA
EA


ist

Quantity
1,220
1,830
13,550
600
2,700
1
1
88
14
68
6
14



Unit
Cost
$10.10
10.50
11.40
15.40
18,40

1,160
2,790
854
175
854
90




Construction
$ 12,320
19,220
154,470
9,240
49,680
36,800
1,160
245,520
11,960
11,900
5,120
1,260
558,650
195,530
754,180

Salvage
$ 7,390
11,530
92,680
5,540
29,810
22,080
700
73,670
7,170
7,170
3,070
760
261,570



O&H
$ 23
35
257
11
102
-
-
5,456
140
680
60
—
6,764


EA
EA
EA
EA
:ost
t
28
28
25
28


2,790
800
854
90


78,120
22,400
21,350
2,520
124,390
6,220
23,440
13,440
12,810
1,510
51,200

1,736
280
-
—
2,016
101
                                       E-5

-------
 Table E-5.   Quantities and  costs for STE gravity  sewers  for  the north and west
             shorelines of  Island Lake,  and  transmission  to Bog Treatment.
             (Alternative 5A)
 Item                       Unit

 STE gravity sewer pipe
   4"                        LF
   6"                        LF
   Manholes                   EA
 Force main,  common trench
   2Y1                        LF
   3"                        LF
   4"                        LF
 Force main,  individual  trench
   2"                        LF
   2h"                        LF
   3"                        LF
   4"                        LF
 Lift Station
   A 82 gpm,  TDK 88 ft        EA
   B 60 gpm,  TDH 32 ft        EA
   C 40 gpm,  TDH 26 ft        EA
   D 25 spm,  TDH 19  ft        EA
 Auxiliary power units
   3 Hp                       EA
   2 Hp                       EA
 Service connection
   STE gravity                EA
   STE pump                   EA
 Septic tank
  new + abandon privy        EA
   upgrade                    EA
   replace                    EA
 Building sewer               EA

 Subtotal initial  cost
 Service factor (35%)
 Subtotal initial  capital cost

 Future connection cost
   Service connection
     STE gravity
     STE pump
   Septic tank
    new
    replace
  Building sewer

 Subtotal future connection cost
Annual future connection cost
Unit
tantity Cost
9,530
5,520
4
1,060
1,540
1,000
1,200
450
700
4,550
1
1
1
1
2
1
86
2
14
68
6
14
$ 16.90
18.40
1,160
6.50
7.50
8.40
11.50
11.80
12.70
13.70




7,800
6,300
958
2,790
854
175
854
90
Construction  Salvage
 $161,060
  101,570
    4,640

    6,890
   11,550
    8,400

   13,800
    5,310
    8,890
   62,340

   25,400
   22,600
   22,600
   22,600

   15,600
    6,300

   82,390
    5,580

   11,960
   11,900
    5,120
    1,260

  617,760
  216,220
  833,980
$96,630
 60,940
  2,780

  4,130
  6,930
  5,040

  8,280
  3,190
  5,330
 37,400

  7,620
  6,780
  6,780
  6,780

  4,680
  1,890

 49,430
  1,680

  7,170
  7,140
  3,070
    760
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
ost
t
27
1
28
25
28

958
2,790
800
854
90

25,870
2,790
22,400
21,810
2,520
75,390
3,770
15,520
840
13,440
12,810
1,510
44,120
            O&M
$  362
   210
 1,710
 1,700
 1,510
 1,480
   124

   140
   680
    60
334,430    7,976
                            62

                           280
                          342
                            17
                                       E-6

-------
Unit
LF
LF
LF
LF
LF
EA
Quantity
660
890
2,740
16,670
1,200
1
Unit
Cost
$ 10.10
10.50
11.40
12.50
18.40
1,160
Construction
$ 6,670
9,350
31,240
208,380
22,080
1,160
Salvage
$ 4,000
5,610
18,740
125,030
13,250
700
O&M
$ 13
17
52
317
46
                                     88
2,790
245,520
73,670    5,456
Table E-6.  Quantities and costs for STE pressure sewers for the north and west
            shorelines of Island Lake, and transmission to Bog Treatment.
            (Alternative 5B).
jtem

STE pressure sewer pipe
  2"

  3"
  4"
STE gravity sewer pipe
  6"
  Manhole
Service connection
 STE pump                   EA
Septic tank
  new + abandon privy
  upgrade
  replace
Bu ild ing s ewe r

Subtotal initial cost
Service factor (35%)
Subtotal initial capital cost

Future connection cost
  Service connection
   STE pump
  Septic tank
    new
    replace
  Building sewer

Subtotal future connection cost
Annual future connection cost
EA
EA
EA
EA


it
14
68
6
14



854
175
854
90



11,960
11,900
5,120
1,260
554,640
194,120
748,760
7,170
7,170
3,070
760
259,170


140
680
60
—
6,781


EA
EA
EA
EA
ost
it
28
28
25
28


2,790
800
854
90


78,120
22,400
21,350
2,520
124,390
6,220
23,440
13,400
12,810
1,510
51,200

1,736
280
-
—
2,016
101
                                      E=7

-------
Table E-7,
Quantities and costs for conventional gravity sewers for the entire
shoreline of Island Lake, and transmission to existing Sand Lake sewers.
(Alternative 6A).
Item
               Unit  Quantity
Sewer Pipe
  8"
Force main, common trench
  2"
  2%"
  3"
  4"
Force main individual trench
    2"
    3"
    4"
    3" Lake Crossing
    4" Highway Crossing
Lift Station
  A 150 gpm, TDH 43 Ft
  B 110 gpm, TDH 31 ft
  C  40 gpm, TDH 21 ft
  D  25 gpm, TDH 19 ft
  E  50 gpm, TDH 33 ft
  F  25 gpm, TDH 10 ft
  G  25 gpm, TDH 34 ft
Auxiliary Power Units
  5 Hp
  2 Hp
Wye
Service connection
House lead
  gravity
  grinder pump
Abandon septic tank, privy
 or holding tank
Subtotal initial cost
Service factor (27%)
Subtotal initial capital cost

Future connection cost
  Wye
  Service connection
  Houselead
    gravity
    grinder pump

Subtotal future connection cost
Annual future connection cost
Unit
Cost
Construction  Salvage
O&M
                LF    28,290   $  26.50   $ 749,690    $449,810  $2,122
LF
LF
LF
LF
i
LF
LF
LF









EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
1,710
700
2,790
1,020
2,660
1,480
2,050









2
3
151
.151
148
3
151
6.20
6.50
7.50
8.40
11.50
12.70
13.80









8,050
6,300
49
140
1,000
2,850
54
10,600
4,550
20,930
8,570
30,590
18,800
28,290
40,000
36,800
25,400
25,400
22,600
22,600
22,600
22,600
22,600
16,100
18,900
7,400
21,140
148,000
8,550
8,150
6,360
2,730
12,560
5,140
18,350
11,280
16,970
24,000
22,080
7,620
7,620
6,780
6,780
6,780
6,780
6,780
4,830
5,670
4,440
12,680
88,800
2,570
-
-
-
-
—
_
-
-
-
—
2,189
2,081
1,498
1,481
1,677
1,472
1,496
—
-
-
•~
_
186
-
                                          1,340,860
                                            362,030
                                          1,702,890
                       737,410  14,205
EA
EA
EA
EA
lOSt
t
63
63
61
2

49
140
1,000
2,850

3,090
8,820
61,000
5,700
78,610
3,931
' 1,850
5,390
36,600
3,420
47,260
                                                                    121

                                                                    12 *•
                                                                      d
                                     E-8

-------
Table E-8.
Quantities and costs for STE gravity sewers for the entire shoreline
of Island Lake and transmission to existing Sand Lake sewers.
(Alternative 6B).
Item
               Unit  Quantity
Unit
Cost
Construction  Salvage
STE gravity sewers
  4"
  6"
  8"
  Manholes
Force main, common trench
  2"
  2%"
  3"
  4"
Force main, individual trench
  2"
  3"
  4"
  3" Lake crossing
  4" Highway Crossing
Lift Stations
  A 150 gpm, TDH 43 ft
  B 110 gpm, TDH 31 ft
  C  40 gpm, TDH 21 ft
  D  25 gpm, TDH 19 ft
  E  50 gpm, TDH 33 ft
  F  25 gpm, TDH 10 ft
  G  25 gpm, TDH 34 ft
Auxiluary power units
  5 Hp
  2 Hp
Service connection
  STE gravity
  STE pump
Septic tank
  new + abandon privy
  upgrade
  replace
Building sewer

Subtotal initial cost
Service factor (35%)
Subtotal initial capital cost

Future connection cost
  Service connection
    STE gravity             EA
    STE pump                EA
  Septic tank
    new                     EA
    replace                 EA
  Building sewer            EA

  Subtotal future connection cost
  Annual future connection cost
          O&M
LF
LF
LF
EA
LF
LF
LF
LF
•h
*n
LF
LF
LF









EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA


it
23,430
3,320
2,260
8
1,710
700
2,790
1,020
2,660
1,480
2,050









2
3
148
3
35
107
9
35



$ 16.90
18.40
24.10
1,160
6.20
6.50
7.50
8.40
11.50
12.70
13.80









8,050
6,300
958
2,790
854
175
854
90



§395,970
61,090
54,470
9,280
10,600
4,550
20,930
8,570
30,590
18,800
28,290
40,000
36,800
25,400
25,400
22,600
22,600
22,600
22,660
22,600
16,100
18,900
141,780
8,370
29,890
18,730
7,690
3,150
1,128,380
394,930
1,523,310
$237,580
36,650
32,680
5,570
6,360
2,730
12,560
5,140
18,350
11,280
16,970
24,000
22,080
7,620
7,620
6,780
6,780
6,780
6,780
6,780
4,830
5,670
85,070
2,510
17,930
11,240
4,610
1,890
614,840


$ 890
126
86
_
1
-
-
—
_
-
-
-
—
2,189
2,081
1,498
1,481
1,677
1,472
1,496
—
—
_
186
350
1,070
90
—
14 , 692


                          61
                           2

                          63
                          38
                          63
   958
 2,790

   800
   854
    90
                                       E-9
    58,440
     5,580

    50,400
    32,450
     5,670

   152,540
     7,627
35,060
 1,670

30,240
19,470
 3,400

89,840
124

630
                                                                    754
                                                                     38

-------
 Table  E-9.   Quantities  and  costs  for  STE  pressure  sewers  for  the entire shoreline
             of  Island Lake, and transmission  to existing  Sand Lake sewers.
             (Alternative 6C).
 Item

 STE  pressure sewers
  2"
  2k"
  3"
  4"
 STE  gravity sewers
  8"
  Manholes
  8" Highway crossing
 Service connection STE pump EA
 Septic tank
  new -i- abandon privy
  upgrade
  replace
Building sewer

Subtotal initial cost
Service factor (35%)
Subtotal initial cost

Future connection cost
  Service connection
   STE pump
  Septic tank
     new
     replace
  Building sewer

Subtotal future connection cost
Annual future connection cost

Unit
LF
LF
LF
LF
LF
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA




Quantity
2,020
2,280
12,900
17,340
2,700
2
1
151
35
107
9
35



Unit
Cost
$10.10
10.50
11.40
12.50
24.10
1,160

2,790
854
175
854
90




Construction
$ 20,400
23,940
147,060
216,750
65,070
2,320
36,800
421,290
29,890
18,730
7,690
3,150
993,090
347,380
1,340,670

Salvage
$ 12,240
14,360
88,240
130,050
39,040
1,390
22,080
126,390
17,930
11,340
4,610
1,890
469,560



O&M
$ 38
43
245
329
103
-
-
9,362
350
11,630
90
-
11,630


EA
EA
EA
EA
ost
t
63
63
38
63


2,790
800
854
90


175,770
50,400
32,450
5,670
264,290
13,215
52,730
30,240
19,470
3,400
105,840

3,906
630
-
—
4,536
227
                                      E-10

-------
 Table  E-10.   Quantities and costs for conventional gravity sewers for the entire shoreline
              of  Sturgeon Lake  and transmission to new Island Lake sewers.
              (Alternative 7A).
 Item

 Sewer  Pipe  8"
 Force  main,  common  trench
   2"
   4"
   6"
                            Unit   Quantity
                                             Unit
                                             Cost
                            LF     34,200    $26.50
                            LF
                            LF
                            LF
 Force main,  individual  trench
  2"
  2Jj"
  3"
  4"
  6"
Lift Stations
  A  25 gpra, TTJH
     60 gpra,
                            LF
                            LF
                            LF
                            LF
                            LF
                   8  ft
             TDK 51  ft
  B
  C  90 gpra, TDH 24 ft
  D 110 gpra, TDH 21 ft
  E 190 gpm, TDH 54 ft
  F  35 spm, TDH 49 ft
  G  25 gpm, TDH 69 ft
  H  25 gpm, TDH 95 ft
Auxiliary Power Units
  5 HP
  3 HP
  2 HP
Wye
Service connection
House lead
  gravity
  grinder-pump
Abandon septic tank, privy
 or holding tank
                            EA
                            EA
                            EA
                            EA
                            EA

                            EA
                            EA
                            EA
Subtotal initial cost
Service factor  (27%)
Subtotal initial capital cost

Future connection cost
  Wye
  Service connection
  Houselead
    gravity
    grinder pump

Subtotal future connection cost
Annual future connection cost
1,740
  960
  500

1,900
2,610
3,640
1,880
8,900
                                       2
                                       4
                                       4
                                     197
                                     197

                                     193
                                       4
                                     197
 6.20
 8.40
11.10

11.50
11.80
12.70
13.80
16.70
         8,050
         7,800
         6,300
            49
           140

         1,000
         2,850
            54
$906,300

  10,790
   8,060
   5,550

  21,850
  30,800
  46,230
  25,940
 148,630

  22,600
  22,600
  25,400
  25,400
  25,400
  22,600
  22,600
  22,600

  16,100
  31,200
  25,200
   9,650
  27,580

 193,000
  11,400
  10,640
                                                      1,718,120
                                                        463,890
                                                      2,182,010
Salvage O&M
?543,780
6,470
4,840
3,330
13,110
18,480
27,740
15,570
89,180
6,780
6,780
7,620
7,620
7,620
6,780
6,780
6,780
4,830
9,360
7,560
5,790
16,550
115,800
3,420
$2,567
_
-
-
_
-
-
-
—
1,478
1,745
1,713
2,058
2,234
1,553
1,508
1,525
_
-
-
-
—
_
248
                                                                    942,570  16,629
EA
EA
EA
EA
;ost
t
85
85
83
2

49
140
1,000
2,850

4,170
11,900
83,000
5,700
104,770
5,239
2,500
7,140
49,800
3,420
62,860
                                                                                124

                                                                                124
                                                                                  6
 Serving Island Lake and Sturgeon Lake,
                                      E-ll

-------
 Table  E-ll.   Quantities  and  costs  for  conventional gravity  sewers  for the entire shoreline
              of  Island Lake, and transmission of both  Island Lake  and Sturgeon Lake was-;e-
              water  to existing  Sand  Lake  sewers.  (Alternative 7A).
 Item

 Sewer Pipe
  8"
  10"
 Force main, common  trench

  3"
  6"
 Force main, individual trench
  3"
  6"
  3" Lake crossing
  6" Highway crossing
Lift Stations
  A 280 gpm, TDH 23 ft
  B 110 gpm, TDH 31 ft
  C  40 gpm, TDH 21 ft
     25 gpm, TDH 19 ft
     50 gpm, TDH 33 ft
     25 gpm, TDH 10 ft
     40 gpm, TDH 36 ft
  D
  E
  F
  G
Wye
Service connection
House lead
  gravity
  grinder-pump
Abandon septic tank, privy
 or holding tank
Subtotal initial cost
Service factor (27%)
Subtotal initial capital cost

Future connection cost
  Wye
  Service connection
  House lead
    gravity
    grinder pump

Subtotal future connection cost
Annual future connection cost

Unit
LF
LF
LF
LF
LF
rh
cn
LF
LF
LF
LF
LS
LS







EA
EA
EA
EA
EA

Quantity
27,600
700
2,410
2,790
1,020
1,970
690
1,480
2,050









151
151
148
3
151
Unit
Cost
$26.50
22.20
6.50
7.50
11.10
11.50
11.80
12.70
16.70









49
140
1,000
2,850
54

Construction
$731,400
19,040
15,670
20,930
11,320
22,660
8,140
18,800
34,240
40,000
36,000
25,400
25,400
22,600
22,600
22,600
22,600
22,600
7,400
2L,140
148,000
8,550
8,150

Salvage
$438,840
11,420
9,400
12,560
6,790
13,590
4,890
11,280
20,540
24,000
22,080
7,620
7,620
6,780
6,780
6,780
6,780
6,780
4,440
12,680
88,800
2,570
-

O&M
$2,070
53
_
-
—
_
-
-
—
-
-
2,467
2,081
1,498
1,481
1,677
1,472
1,538
-
—
_
186
-
                                                     1,315,240
                                                       355,110
                                                     1,670,350
                                                                    733,020  14,523
EA
EA
EA
EA
:OSt
t
63
63
61
2

49
140
1,000
2,850

3,090
8,820
61,000
5,700
78,610
3,931
1,850
5,290
36,600
3,420
47,160
-
124
124
6
                                      E-12

-------
Table E-12. Quantities and costs
of Sturgeon Lake and
(Alternative 7B) .

Item Unit
STE gravity sewer
4" LF
6" LF
8" LF
Manholes EA
Force main, common trench
2" LF
4" LF
6" LF
Force main, individual trench
2" LF
2%" LF
3" LF
4" LF
6" LF
Lift Stations
A 25 gpm, TDH 8 ft
B 60 gpm, TDH 51 ft
C 90 gpm, TDH 21 ft
D 110 gpm, TDH 21 ft
E 190 gpm, TDH 54 ft
F 35 gpm, TDH 49 ft
G 25 gpm, TDH 69 ft
H 25 gpm, TDH 95 ft
Auxiliary Power Units
5 HP EA
3 HP EA
2 HP EA
Service connection
STE gravity EA
STE pump EA
Septic tank
new + abandon privy EA
upgrade EA
replace EA
Building sewer EA
Subtotal initial cost
Service factor (35%)
Subtotal initial capital cost
Future connection cost
Service connection EA
STE gravity EA
STE pump EA
Septic tank
new EA
replace EA
Building Sewer EA
Subtotal future connection cost
Annual future connection cost
for STE gravity sewers for the entire shoreline
transmission to new


Quantity

25,120
4,640
5,920
4

1,740
960
500

1,900
2,610
3,640
1,880
8,900










2
4
4

193
4

30
155
12
30





83
2

85
35
85



Unit
Cost

$16.90
18.40
24.10
1,160

6.20
8.40
11.10

11.50
11.80
12.70
13.80
16.70










8,050
7,800
6,300

958
2,790

854
175
854
90





958
2,790

800
854
90


Island Lake


Construction

$424,530
85,380
142,670
4,640

10,790
8,060
5,550

21,850
30,800
46,230
25,940
148,630

22,600
22,600
25,400
25,400
25,400
22,600
22,600
22,600

16,100
31,200
25,200

184,890
11,160

25,630
27,130
10,250
2,700
1,478,530
517,490
1,996,020


79,510
5,580

68,000
29,890
7,650
190,630
9,532
sewers .


Salvage

$254,720
51,230
85,600
2,780

6,470
4,840
3,330

13,110
18,480
27,740
15,570
89,180

6,780
6,780
7,620
7,620
7,620
6,780
6,780
6,780

4,830
9,360
7,560

110,940
3,350

15,370
16,280
6,150
1,620
805,270




47,710
1,670

40,800
17,930
4,590
112,700




O&M

$ 955
176
225
-

-
-
-

-
-
-
-
—

1,478
1,745
1,713
2,058
2,234
1,553
1,508
1,525

-
-
-

-
248

300
1,550
120
— '
17 , 388




-
124

850
-
~
974
49
Serving Island Lake and Sturgeon Lake
                                       E-13

-------
Table E-13.
Quantities and costs for STE gravity sewers for the entire shoreline
of Island Lake and transmission of Island Lake and Sturgeon Lake
wastewater to existing Sand Lake sewers.  (Alternative 7B).
Item
              Unit  Quantity
Unit
Cost
Construction  Salvage
Future connection cost
  Service connection
    STE gravity
    STE pump
  Septic tank
    new
    replace
  Building sewer

Subtotal future connection cost
Annual future connection cost
O&M
STE gravity sewer
4"
6"
8"
10"
Manhole
Force main, common trench
2h"
3"
6"

LF
LF
LF
LF
EA

LF
LF
LF

22,020
3,320
2,260
800
10

2,410
2,790
1,020

$16.90
18.40
24.10
24.80
1,160

6.50
7.50
11.10

$372,140
61,090
54,470
19,840
11,600

15,670
20,930
11,320

$223,280
36,650
32,680
11,900
6,960

9,400
12,560
6,790

$ 837
126
86
30
-

-
-
-
Force main, individual trench
2"
2h"
3"
6"
3" Lake Crossing
6" Highway Crossing
Lift Stations
A 280 gpm, TDK 23 ft
B 110 gpm, TDH 31 ft
C 40 gpm, TDH 21 ft
D 25 gpm, TDH 19 ft
E 50 gpm, TDH 33 ft
F 25 gpm, TDH 10 ft
G 40 gpm, TDH 36 ft
Service connection
STE gravity
STE pump
Septic tank
new + abandon privy
upgrade
replace
Building sewer
Subtotal initial cost
Service factor (35%)
Subtotal initial capital
LF
LF
LF
LF











EA
EA

EA
EA
EA
EA


cost
1,970
690
1,480
2,050











148
3

35
107
9
35



11.50
11.80
12.70
16.70











958
2,790

854
175
854
90



22,660
8,140
18,800
34,240
40,000
36,000

25,400
25,400
22,600
22,600
22,600
22,600
22,600

141,780
8,370

29,890
18,730
7,690
3,150
1,100,310
385,110
1,485,420
13,590
4,890
11,280
20,540
24,000
22,080

7,620
7,620
6,780
6,780
6,780
6,780
6,780

85,070
2,510

17,930
11,240
4,610
1,890
608,990


-
-
-
-
-
-

2,467
2,081
1,498
1,481
1,677
1,472
1,538

-
186

350
1,070
90
—
14,989


EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
:OSt
• t
61
2
63
38
63


958
2,790
800
854
90


58,440
5,580
50,400
32,450
5,670
152,470
7,624
35,060
1,670
30,240
19,470
3,400
89,840

-
124
630
-
—
754
38
                                      E-14

-------
Table E-14.  Quantities and costs for STE pressure sewers serving the entire
             shoreline of Sturgeon Lake and transmission to new Island Lake sewers,
             (Alternative 7C).
Item

STE pressure pipe
  2"
  2%"
  3"
  4"
  6"
STE gravity sewer
  4"
  Manholes
Force main, individual
  6"
Lift stations3
  B  5U gpm, TDH 99 ft
  C 130 spm, TDH 18 f£
Auxiliary Power Units
  5 HP
Service connection STE
Septic tank
  new + abandon privy
  upgrade
  replace
Building sewer
Subtotal initial cost
Service factor (35%)
Subtotal initial capital cost

Future connection cost
  Service connection
   STE pump
  Septic tank
    new
    replace
  Building sewer

Subtotal future connection cost
Annual future connection cost

Unit
LF
LF
LF
LF
LF
LF
EA
trench
LF

Quantity
1,300
6,900
15,070
13,880
2,950
1,740
2

9,650
Unit
Cost
$10.10
10.50
11.40
12.50
15.40
16.90
1,160

16.70

Construction
$ 13,130
72,450
171,800
173,500
45,430
29,410
2,320

161,160

Salvage
$ 7,880
43,470
103,080
104,100
27,260
17,640
1,390

96,690

O&M
$ 25
131
286
264
56
66
-

-


EA
pump EA
EA
EA
EA
EA


.1 cost


2
197
30
155
12
30





8,050
2,790
854
175
854
90
•


22,600
25,400
16,100
549,630
25,620
27,130
10,250
2,700
1,347,120
471,490
1,818,610
6,780
7,620
4,830
164,890
15,370
16,280
6,150
1,620
625,050


1,784
2,060
—
12,214
300
1,290
120
—
18,856


EA
EA
EA
EA
ost
It
85
85
35
85


2,790
800
854
90


237,150
68,000
29,890
7,650
342,690
17,135
71,150
40,800
17,730
4,590
134,270

5,270
850
-
—
6,120
306
 Lift station A is included on Table E-15.

 Serving Island Lake and Sturegon Lake.
                                      E-15

-------
Table  E-15.  Quantities and costs  for STE pressure sewers for the entire shoreline
             of Island Lake and transmission of Island Lake and Sturgeon Lake waste-
             water  to existing Sand Lake sewers.  (Alternative 7C) .
Item

STE pressure pipe
  2"
  2%"
  3"
  4"

STE gravity sewer
  6"
  8"
  Manhole
  8" Highway crossing
Force main, individual trench
  6"
  6" Highway crossing
Force main, common trench
  6"                        LF
Lift Stations
  A 200 gpm, TDH 34 ft
Service connection-STE pump EA
Septic tank
  new + abandon privy       EA
  upgrade                   EA
  replace                   EA
Building sewer              EA

Subtotal initial cost
Service factor (35%)
Subtotal initial capital cost

Future connection cost
Service connection STE pump EA
  Septic tank
    new                     EA
    replace                 EA
  Building sewer            EA

Subtotal future connection cost
Annual future connection cost

Unit
LF
LF
LF
LF
LF
LF
EA
EA
rh
.en
LF
EA

Quantity
1,920
2,020
11,260
13,540
2,000
3,270
3
1
2,350
1
Unit
Cost
$10.10
10.50
11.40
12.50
18.40
24.10
1,200

16.70


Construction
$ 19,390
21,210
128,360
169,250
36,800
78,810
3,600
36,800
39,250
36,800

Salvage
$ 11,640
12,730
77,020
101,550
22,080
47,280
2,160
22,080
23,550
22,080

O&M
$ 36
38
214
257
76
124
-
-
—
-
720
 63

 63
 38
 63
11.10
  7,990
2,790

  800
  854
   90
175,770

 50,400
 32,450
  5,670

264,290
 13,215
  4,800

151
35
107
9
35




2,790
854
175
854
90



25,400
421,290
29,890
18,730
7,690
3,150
1,084,410
379,440
1,463,950
7,620
126,390
17,930
11,240
4,610
1,890
517,650


2,420
9,362
350
1,070
90
-
14,037


 52,730

 30,240
 19,470
  3,400

105,840
3,906

  630
                                          4,536
                                            227
                                      E-16

-------












































w
0
41
•H
4J
(9
,y
0)
e
B

*fl
1
td
41

3
















«
c
c
c
5.
3
Li
u
n
C
3
4»
b
3



















tfl
"
B)

^7
5


















g
u
^
M
S
fl C
u u
O (0
H «
0*
*-*
(9

O
H
g
J= °
4J
b
0 4)
3 S
eg
§ "M
CO V]
a- o
t
u
n
6
-.
4j j;

flj O
B
U §
C ^
of
25
0 ^H
H <0
V)
8
>-i jj
§ S
I-
< n
e
3
Q
£
H
L
C O
en
£|
3

2
o

•J
1
—
«l
I
3

















ass
\0 00 (/>
oo en eo


sgs

* • *
CM 
rH M «*1

O O O
OH CM ••I
• • •
M M m

S|S
^•""5






OQ a* r*-

oog
o_RS

— 3 n


3 5 8



S ° S
0 S 0
r% ao in
0 O O
« IA ^4
O ""I *O
-T in o\

So 9
•» 00
CH M ^»
c% in oo
E£ S
*n ^ CO
ri \O &

000
SS2
f*. tn I-*
2-"
°||
00 S S



*
"^
•*
en
• -H
8 37s
U *M!
^01 u eg .
fl r^ O\ in
00 P4 •* «
o o o o
(N| ^ O tf<
flO CO -* 00
«M r^ o Us

5sf!
^4 in 40 r>
So* o o
OQ ^H -4

CM OS m ^

0000
O* >* **"> O^
Sr«. «t i-»
•o to ch
ssss
FH CO ^H rt
 vfi





^
c
U
(0
4J
S
PQ

"*
. • • »
3333


S
S




|



1


1



1






>







I



0
r^
£
I
WO
CN

1
o

00
CM


'







'DO
u
<
5
1
4J
(d

OS
c

I
.17

-------
Table E-17. Quantities and costs for STE pressure collection .for a limited area on
            the east shore of Sturgeon Lake, transmission, and treatment and disposal
            in a Cluster Drainfield.  (Alternatives 3, 4, 5 and 6)
Item
Collection & transmission
  STE gravity pipe
    4"
  STE pressure pipe
    3"
Lift Station
  25 gpm, TDH 66 ft
Auxiliary Power
  3 Hp
Service connection
  STE pump
Septic tank
  new + abandon privy
  upgrade
  replace
Building sewer
Cluster Drainfield
  Gravel road
  land
  Fence
  Fence gate
  Do s ing chamber
   (7000 gal)
  Dosing pumps (Duplex 250
   gpm, TDH 20 ft)
  6" STE gravity pipe
  Monitoring well & test-
   ing
  Trench drainfield

Subtotal initial cost
Service factor (35%)
Subtotal initial capital cost

Future connection cost
  Service connection
    STE pump
  Septic tank
    new
  Building sewer

  Subtotal future connection cost
  Annual future connection cost
Jnit
LF
LF

EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
LF
AC
LF
EA
EA
EA
LF
EA
SF
st
EA
EA
EA
i cost
lOSt
Quantity
2,100
7,850

1
20
1
18
1
1
800
5
1,900
1
1
1
1,630
2
16,900

8
8
8

Unit
Cost
$16.90
11.40

7,800
2,790
854
175
854
90
7.00
3,000
8.14
560
7,500
16,000
13.30
1,250
2.10

2,790
800
90

Construction
$35,490
89,490
22,600
7,800
55,800
850
3,150
850
90
5,600
15,000
15,570
560
7,500
16,000
21,680
2,500
35,490
336,020
117,610
453,630
22,320
6,400
720
29,440
1,472
Salvage
$21,290
53,690
6,780
2,340
16,740
510
1,890
510
50
27,090
4,500
4,800
13,010
-
153,200
6,700
3,840
430
10,970
O&M
$ 80
149
1,502
-
1,240
10
180
10
320
95
-
2,180
62
240
423
6,491
500
80
580
29
                                      E- 18

-------
Table E-18.  Quantities and costs for STE pressure sewers for two areas on the
             western shoreline of Island Lake, transmission, and treatment and
             disposaling cluster drainfield.  (Alternative 3)
Item

STft! pressure pipe
  2"
  2%"
  3"
Service connection
  STE pump                  EA
Septic tank
  new & abandon privy
  upgrade
  replace
Building sewer
Cluster Drainfield
  Land
  Fence
  Fence Gate
  Dosing Chamber
  6" STE gravity pipe
  Monitoring well & test
   ing
  Trench drainfield

Subtotal initial cost
Service factor (35%)
Subtotal initial capital cost

Future connection cost
  Service connection
    STE pump
  Septic tank
    new
    replace
  Building Sewer

  Subtotal future connection cost
  Annual future connection cost
Unit
LF
LF
LF
Quantity
700
5,100
3,250
Unit
Cost
$10.10
10.50
11.40
Construction
$ 7,070
53,550
37,050
Salvage
$ 4,240
32,130
22,230
O&M
$ 13
97
62
30
2,790
83,700
25,110    1,860
EA
EA
EA
EA
AC
LF
EA
EA
LF
EA
SF


it
9
13
8
9
11
2,700
1
1
3,710
2
21,000



854
175
854
90
3,000
8.14
560
7,500
13.30
1,250
2.10



7,690
2,280
6,830
810
33,000
21,980
560
7,500
49,340
2,500
44,100
357,960
125,890
483,250
4,610
1,370
4,100
490
59,600
-
-
4,500
29,600
_
—
187,980


90
130
80
—
_
135
-
-
141
240
525
3,373


EA
EA
EA
EA
. cost
:ost
5
5
12
5


2,790
800
854
90


13,950
4,000
10,250
450
28,650
1,433
4,190
2,400
6,150
270
13,010

310
50
-
—
360
18
                                      E-19

-------
Table E-19.  Quantities and costs for upgrading existing Moose Lake WWTP to serve
             North and West shorelines of Island Lake.  (Alternative 4)
Item

Land
Lagoon Construction
 & Site Work
Bentonite liner
Main Lift Station
  Incremental capacity

Subtotal
Service factor (27%)
Total initial capital cost
Unit  Quantity
          Unit
          Cost
 AC

 LS
 LS

 LS
14
$3,000
Construction  Salvage     O&M

 $ 42,000     $ 75,860
                    166,300
                     13,200

                      4,600

                    226,100
                     61,050
                    287,150
                         99,780  $1,000
                          3,960

                          1,380   1,260

                        180,980   2,260
                                      E-20

-------
Table E-20.  Quantities and costs for Bog Treatment WWTP to serve north and
             west shorelines of Island Lake.   (Alternative 5)
Item

Land
Site evaluation
Site preparation
Trench construction
Curtain drain trench
Pumps & chambers
Dewatering piping
Flow meter assembly
Distribution Box
Pipe to trenches (Matl.
 only)
Monitoring wells
Laboratory analysis
Service Roads
Fencing
Electrical service

Subtotal
Service factor (35%)
Total initial capital cost

Unit
AC
LS
LS
CY
LF
EA
LF
LS
LS
LF
EA
LS
LF
LF
LS




Quantity
20


11,330
1,580
2
800


2,625
6

300
4,070




Unit
Cost
$2,000


4.20
6.50
3,400
4.00


3.00
100

7.00
8.14





Construction
$ 40,000
15,200
1,600
47,590
10,270
6,800
3,200
10,000
2,000
7,880
600
-
2,100
33,130
1,000
181,370
63,480
244,850

Salvage
$53,600
-
-
_
2,370
670
1,920
3,000
1,200
4,730
-
-
-
-
—
67,490



O&M
—
-
-
-
$ 93
1,487
305
-
—
—
-
7,480
120
204
—
9,689


                                       E-21

-------
Table E-21.  Quantities and costs for upgrading existing Moose Lake WWTP to serve
             the entire shoreline of Island Lake.  (Alternative 6).
Item

Land
Lagoon construction &
 sitework
Bentonite liner
Main lift station
  incremental capacity

Subtotal
Service factor (27%)
Total initial capital cost
Unit  Quantity
         Unit
         Cost
 AC

 LS
 LS

 LS
22
$3,000
Construction  galvage     O&M

 $ 66,000     $119,200
                   199,600
                    19,800

                    11,600

                   297,000
                    80,190
                   377,190
                         119,760  $1,300
                          11,880

                           3,480   1,710

                         254,320   3,010
                                      E-22

-------
Table E-22.  Quantities and costs for upgrading existing Moose Lake WWTP to
             serve the entire shoreline of Island Lake and Sturgeon Lake.
             (Alternative 7).
Item

Land
Lagoon construction &
 sitework
Bentonite Liner
Main lift station
  Incremental capacity

Subtotal
Service factor (27%)
Total initial capital cost
Unit  Quantity
          Unit
          Cost
 AC

 LS
 LS

 LS
48
$3,000
Construction  Salvage     O&M

 $144,000     $260,080
                    332,600
                     42,300

                     23,100

                    542,000
                    146,340
                    688,340
                         199,560  $2,100
                          25,380

                           6,930   2,840

                         491,950   4,940
                                      E-23

-------
Table E-23.  Administrative costs.  (All Alternatives)
Item

Office/Garage
Administrative Person-
 nel Services

Subtotal initial cost
Unit  Quantity

 LS

 LS
Unit
Cost
Construction  Salvage
  O&M

§ 1,400

 27,000

 28,400
                                      E-
                                        24

-------








u
10
S
C
o
•H
u
3
ki
Future Const







u
to
3
Q
U
•H
C

(0
u
n
u
01
I
a.
3
ai
u
!
UM
0
X
U
Q
1
U)
•*
CM
U
% fl
2 g
A M
H •-«
•H
a
k>
£




^
4>
14
S
Present

ncremental
M
a
u
8
**
tt
I

£
u
1
U
C
to
V
w
P-













resent Worth
OM
r*t
n
u
H

0
i
^
(H
V)
I
U
u
3
U
«J
n
1
5
o
e
5
a
5
5
struct ion
«
4J
Q
«
H
£
>4
O

!
«
in

1
•3

^-j
a
bj
•H
a
a
u







o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
.H 00 S (5 -4 0 "H CN rn o 3 CO Q ^ ^ -*
a* --4 Odr^O eg cn r- to en p- o i*-
xt *H at i0 
*O CM i1*- m*-*m —!,-)-«• ,_* CM

8SS8 g§3'2 SSSS SSS 5
^O^-tr* co <9 >T  tA CM »H \*> CO CM O> \O CO CM r*- CO CM ^ CM
,*« ««• 4*t r-tfHCM >-4CM r-lfH
SOOO lAfiSr- -»r fo ov \o COO^CM o1*
CNONOD otcMrHM? fnot*Hr- CM ^H «»• A
^rmm-9T F^CM *-t .»-•
So o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
co ^ S Sh u-. -H in roui>H<7> IA-H« «-i
CM »-4 •* ao ^o>sf>A aoo**^iHi anCT* f1 in -, S — \OO^CTV SDOIA o>
k k • * * * k • • • • • *. • • •
rt in o O -^t O O «A lAOO^O O O — * O
m«^>0 -* S -5 vj- CNM3-«CM >fl -3" O <•
.4 — -- »H
a
SOOO OOOO oO<-«^ O^**^ »H 4J
XOA O ^cviAcn SO en r« ^ o^^Q mcMr^m cMr^o^ r*
w4*H^ »HFHCO ^^cMj «H ^ 13
S
|
SSSS SS2S 2SSS SSS S "
CM CO CM O ^4-rMOD -«^CM^ *TCMM9 CM U
--•jAr*.'* r^cMt-^»o co«r«tO eMrvtTt f^ u
CM^FHQO 91 *e ~* i— r^ rv «s| «) xOC^CM.^0 f-itMO CM S
• ««,(. •••>. *••• « • fc •
K 3 "* S •* — "* HO ^—  fOO>O^r«> *A O*i •* O1* • - - * t^
(0«A*rHt3* fOfOrHCJO -H*O-^MS t*
•H g
^co •* a*
in^O ^»HHO ^4^m ^4^ »
SOOO OOOO OOOO OOO O *-3
s»mro -« 0x in m oo>*n-* <»IIA«» m
— i  A
rxcn»Or» ^r**sor-- kOr^sOO r*«o^ vO 3
^ CM sr ^^co MH<^CM vOfH4 ^ U
n-O-*O\ lAiA-^IM iAin-«CM IA-<>O -* -H
M -• • CM - *M - >
01
n
(A
M
id
1
«*-!
O
w
1
1
-o 3
M
^j? n S *a Ji ""^ """ £
„ „„ g j!3 g JS3 S .3 S
- 3c 25.= "S^c S g « |
Sfl^ g-oSn ST.&-, §S- 3 - '
U S M ^ -( C COOhifH D C DO k- *-( U OOMtH W M •"*
u cS W 4J (d U MbScd V fl i- S (0 Q) JJ ft) (B V 4) U
£» *3 3 XT 3 U "43jC!u *J — 1 3 JS u M 3 i *J *J X C
^ (D U U O *H ffl U U O *-H M4J4JO "^ 4J U O —1 U »-«
< ™ w o H < "MOH < -H u» a H •< w o H < o *-*
E-25

-------
 Table  E-25.  Quantities  and  costs  for upgrading  and  operation of on-site systems
             for  Island  Lake.   (Alternative  2).

Item
Septic tank
Upgrade (minor)
Upgrade (major)
Soil absorption system
Trench
Seepage bed (400 sq ft)
Mound (400 sq ft incld.
Waste separation

Quantity

89
9

7
2
pump) 32

Blackwater HT - Permanent 5
Blackwater HT - Seasonal
Low flow toilet
Initial cost
Service factor (35%)
Initial capital costs
Future costs
Building sewer
Septic tank, new
Septic tank, upgrade
Trench SAS
Seepage bed SAS
Mound (400 sq ft incld.
Total future costs
Annual future costs
1
6




63
63
38
35
23
pump) 43


Unit
Cost

175
854

1,129
904
2,504

885
885
1,420




90
800
854
1,129
904
2,504



Construction

15,575
7,686

7,903
1,808
80,128

4,425
885
8,520
126,930
44,426
171,360

5,670
50,400
32,452
39,515
20,792
107,672
260,001
13,000

Salvage

9,345
4,612

—
_
-

2,655
531
_
17,140
-
-

3,402
30,240
19,471
-
-
-
53,110
-

O&M

890
90

—
—
2,304

1,915
135
-
5,334
-
-

-
630
-
-
-
3,096
4,036
202
HT - holding tank, SAS - soil absorption system
                                      E-26

-------
Table E-26. Quantities and costs for upgrading and operation of on-site systems
            for Sturgeon Lake.  (Alternative 2).
                              Quantity
Item

Septic tank
  Upgrade (minor)
  Upgrade (major)
Soil absorption system
  Trench
  Mound (400 sq ft incld.
  Mound (250 sq ft incld.
Waste separation
  Blackwater HT - Permanent
  Blackwater HT - Seasonal
  Low flow toilet

Initial cost
Service factor (35%)
Initial capital costs
Future costs
  Building sewer
  Septic tank, new
  Septic tank, upgrade
  Trench SAS
  Seepage bed SAS
  Mound (400 sq ft incld. pump)
  Mound (250 sq ft incld. pump)
  Pump chamber
  Blackwater HT - Permanent
  Blackwater HT - Seasonal
  Low flow toliet

Total future costs
Annual future costs
HT - Holding tank, SAS - soil absorption system
Construction   Salvage   O&M



pump)
pump)
it





129
12
2
3
8
5
3
8



175
854
1,129
2,504
2,154
885
885
1,420



22,575
10,248
2,258
7,512
17,232
4,425
2,655
11,360
78,265
27,393
105,660
13,545
6,149
_
-
—
2,655
1,593
-
23,940
-
-
1,290
120
_
216
576
1,915
405
-
4,522
-
-
85
85
35
33
68
19
3
6
3
2
5


90
800
854
1,129
904
2,504
2,154
700
885
885
350


7,650
68,000
29,890
37,257
61,472
47,576
6,462
4,200
2,655
1,770
1,750
268,682
13,430
                                                                   4,590
                                                                  40,800
                                                                  17,934
                                                                   1,593
                                                                   1,062
                                                                  65,980
                            850
                          1,368
                            216
                            372
                          1,149
                            270
                          4,225
                            211
                                      E-
                                        27

-------
Table  E-27.  Quantities and  costs  for upgrading and  operation  of  on-site  systems
             for Rush Lake,  Passenger Lake, Hogans Acres and Wild Acres.
             (Alternatives 2,  3, 4,  5,  6, and  7).
Item                          Quantity

Septic tank
  Upgrade  (minor)                  37        175
  Upgrade  (major)                  5        854

Initial cost
Service factor  (35%)
Initial capital costs

Future costs
  Building sewer                   68        90
  Septic tank, new                 68        800
  Septic tank, upgrade             9        854
  Seepage bed SAS                  70        904
  Mound (400 sq ft incld. pump)    7     2,504
  Pump chamber                     4        700

Total future costs
Annual future costs

SAS- soil absorption system
Construction   Salvage   O&M
    6,475
    4,270

   10,745
    3,761
   14,506
    6,120
   54,400
    7,686
   63,280
    7,528
    2,800

  151,814
    7,591
 3,885
 2,562

 6,450
 3,672
32,640
 4,612
40,924
  370
   50

  420
  680
  504
  248

1,432
   72
                                      E-28

-------
Table E-28. Quantities and costs for upgrading and operation of on-site systems
            for Island Lake.   (Alternative 3).
Item

Septic tank
  Upgrade (minor)
  Upgrade (major)
Soil absorption system
  Trench
  Seepage bed (400 sq ft)
  Mound (400 sq ft incld.
Waste separation
  Blackwater HT - Permanent
  Blackwater HT - Seasonal
  Low flow toilet

Initial cost
Service factor (35%)
Initial capital costs

Future cost
  Building sewer
  Septic tank, new
  Septic tank, upgrade
  Trench SAS
  Seepage bed SAS
  Mound (400 sq ft. incld. pump)
  Pump chamber

Total future costs
Annual future costs

HT - holding tank, SAS - soil absorption system.

Quantity
68
9
7
2
pump) 30
t 3
2
5



58
58
26
30
23
pump) 31
5


Unit
Cost
175
854
1,129
904
2,504
885
885
1,420



90
800
854
1,129
904
2,504
700



Construction
11,900
7,686
7,903
1,808
75,120
2,655
1,770
7,100
115,942
40,580
156,520
5,220
46,400
22,204
33,870
20,792
77,624
3,500
209,610
10,480

Salvage
7,140
4,612
—
-
—
1,593
1,062
—
14,410
-
••
3,132
27,840
13,322
-
-
-
—
44,290
-

O&M
680
90
-
-
2,160
1,149
270
—
4,349
-
**
—
580
-
-
-
2,232
310
3,122
156
                                        E-29

-------
Table E-29. Quantities and costs  for upgrading and operation of on-site  systems
            for  Sturgeon Lake.   (Alternative 3).
Item
Quantity
Construction   Salvage   O&M
Septic tank
  Upgrade (minor)
  Upgrade (major)
Soil absorption system
  Trench
  Mound (400 s<\ ft incld. pump)

Initial cost
Service factor (35%)
Initial capital costs

Future costs
  Building sewer
  Septic tank, new
  Septic tank, upgrade
  Trench SAS
  Seepage bed SAS
  Mound (400 sq ft)
  Mound (200 sq ft incld. pump)
  Pump chamber
  Blackwater HT Permanent
  Blackwater HT Seasonal
  Low flow toliet

Total future costs
Annual futxire costs
SAS - soil absorption system, HT - holding tank
114
10
2
3



175
854
1,129
2,504



19,950
8,540
2,258
7,512
38,260
13,391
51,651
11,970
5,124
—
—
17,094
-
-
1,140
100
—
216
1,456
-
-
76
76
35
33
68
14
2
6
3
1
4


90
800
854
1,129
904
2,504
2,154
700
885
885
350


6,840
60,800
29,890
37,257
61,472
35,056
4,308
4,200
2,655
885
1,400
244,763
12,238
                                     4,104
                                    36,480
                                    17,934
                           760
                                     1,593
                                       531
                                    60,642
                           144
                           372
                         1,149
                           135
                         2,560
                           129
                                       E-30

-------
Table E-30. Quantities and costs for upgrading and operation of on-site systems
            for Island Lake.   (Alternatives 4 and 5).
                                         Unit
                                         Cost
Item                          Quantity
Septic tank
  Upgrade (minor)
  Upgrade (major)
Soil absorption system
  Trench
  Seepage bed (400 Sq Ft)
  Mound (400 sq ft incld. pump)
Waste Separation
  Blackwater HT - Permanent
  Blackwater HT - Seasonal
  Low flow toilet

Initial cost
Service factor (35%)
Initial capitol costs

Future costs
  Building sewer
  Septic tank, new
  Septic tank, upgrade
  Trench SAS
  Seepage bed SAS
  Mound (400 sq ft incld. pump)
  Pump chamber

Total future costs
Annual future costs
hT- holding tank, SAS- soil absorption system
Construction   Salvage   O&M
28
3
5
2
7
2
2
4



175
854
1,129
904
2,504
885
885
1,420



4,900
2,562
5,645
1,808
17,528
1,770
1,770
5,680
41,663
14,582
56,250
2,940
1,537
_
-
—
1,062
1,062
—
6,600
-
-
280
30
-
-
504
766
270
—
1,850
-
-
35
35
13
15
19
14
2


90
800
854
1,129
904
2,504
700


3,150
28,000
11,102
16,935
17,176
35,056
1,400
112,820
5,640
1,890
16,800
6,661
-
-
-
—
25,350
-
-
350
-
-
-
1,008
124
1,482
74
                                      E-31

-------
Table  E-31.  Quantities and costs  for upgrading and operation of on-site systems
             for  Sturgeon Lake.  (Alternatives 4 and 5).
Item
Quantity
         Construction   Salvage   O&M
Septic tank
  Upgrade (minor)
  Upgrade (major)
Soil absorption system
  Trench
  Mound (400 sq ft incld. pump)

Initial cost
Service factor (35%)
Initial capitol costs
  114
   10

    2
    3
  175
  854

1,129
2,504
19,950
 8,540

 2,258
 7,512

38,260
13,391
51,650
11,970   1,140
 5,124     100
           216

17,090   1,456
Future costs
  Building sewer
  Septic tank, new
  Septic tank, upgrade
  Trench SAS
  Seepage bed SAS
  Mound (400 sq ft)
  Mound (200 sq ft incld. pump)
  Pump chamber
  Blackwater HT Permanent
  Blackwater HT Seasonal
  Low flow toliet

Total future costs
Annual future costs
SAS - soil absorption system, HT - holding tank
76
76
35
33
68
14
2
6
3
1
4


90
800
854
1,129
904
2,504
2,154
700
885
885
350


6,840
60,800
29,890
37,257
61,472
35,056
4,308
4,200
2,655
885
1,400
244,760
12,240
                                     4,104
                                    36,480
                                    17,934
                                     1,593
                                       531
                                    60,640
                                    760
                                    144
                                    372
                                  1,149
                                    135
                                  2,560
                                    128
                                      E-32

-------
Table E-32. Quantities and costs for upgrading and operation of on-site systems
            for Sturgeon Lake.  (Alternative 6).
Item
Quantity
Construction   Salvage   O&M
Septic tank
  Upgrade (minor)
  Upgrade (major)
Soil absorption system
  Trench
  Mound (400 sq ft incld. pump)

Initial cost
Service factor (35%)
Initial capltol costs
114
10
2
3



175
854
1,129
2,504



19,950
8,540
2,258
7,512
38,260
13,391
51,650
11,970
5,124
—
—
17 , 090
-
-
1,140
100
—
216
1,456
-
-
Future costs
  Building sewer
  Septic tank, new
  Septic tank, upgrade
  Trench SAS
  Seepage bed SAS
  Mound (400 sq ft)
  Mound (200 sq ft incld. pump)
  Pump chamber
  Black water HT Permanent
  Blackwater HT Seasonal
  Low flow toliet

Total future costs
Annual future costs
SAS - soil absorption system, HT - holding tank
76
76
35
29
68
14
2
6
3
1
4


90
860
854
1,129
904
2,504
2,154
700
885
885
350


6,840
60,800
29,890
37,257
61,472
35,056
4,308
4,200
2,655
885
1,400
244,760
12,240
                                     4,104
                                    36,480
                                    17,934
                           760
                                     1,593
                                       531
                                    60,640
                           144
                           372
                         1,149
                           135
                         2,560
                           128
                                      E-33

-------

-------
          Appendix  F
Analysis of Grant  Eligibility
                                                                   4J
                                                                   •rl
                                                                   
-------

-------
r
USEPA
Grant
85%
75%
State
Grant
9%
15%
Total
Grant
94%
90%
                                         GRANT ELIGIBILITY
                 The eligibility  of initial  capital costs for  State  and  USEPA grants
            are based on  MPCA policy and USEPA Region V policy which are in turn based
            on the  Code of  Federal Regulations, Title 40,  Part  35.  These regulations
            are currently being  revised.   Interim Final regulations were issued in the
            Federal Register on May 12, 1982, and the Final regulations are expected in
            the  immediate future.   Current  MPCA  policy was  used to  determine costs
            eligible for grants (Mr. L. Zdon, MPCA, to WAPORA,  Inc., 18 August 1982 and
            29 November 1982).

                 A project that  is determined to be  innovative  and alternative quali-
            fies for a greater  percentage of grant funding of  eligible initial capital
            costs than conventional projects.  The percentage is shown below:
                                                                                 1
                                               Grant Percentage of Eligible Costs
            Innovative and Alternative
            Conventional
                 The initial capital costs include the following:

                      o    Eligible costs  - Initial  capital  costs eligible  for USEPA
                           and state grants.

                      o    Ineligible costs  -  Initial  capital  costs not  eligible for
                           USEPA and  State grants  (not  including  homeowner ineligible
                           costs).

                      o    Homeowner inelgible costs  -  Initial  capital costs that must
                           be financed by the individual homeowner.

                 Operation and maintenance costs are not grant eligible.

                 Grant eligibility  in this report was based on the following:

                      Collection and Conveyance

                           1.   STE gravity  and  STE  pressure  sewers -  All costs were
                                considered  eligible  for  innovative  and   alternative
                                funding,  except  for  building  sewers  which  were con-
                                sidered homeowner ineligible.

                           2.   Conventional  gravity  sewers  -  Pump  stations,  force
                                mains, and any gravity  sewers  used only as inteceptors
                                were  considered  eligible  for  conventional  funding.
                                Gravity collection  sewers were  considered  ineligible.
                                House leads  (piping from the  residence  to  the  edge of
                                the sewer easement)  were considered ineligible.
                                                  F-l

-------
         Centralized Treatment

              1.   Upgrading  the Moose  Lake WWTP  -  All costs  were con-
                   sidered  eligible  for  conventional  funding  except for
                   land purchase which was considered ineligible

              2.   Bog  Treatment - All  costs (including land)  were con-
                   sidered   eligible   for   innovative   and   alternative
                   fund ing.

         Cluster Drainfields

              All costs were considered eligible for innovative and alter-
              native  funding  (including  STE gravity  and  STE  pressure
              collection  systems)  except building  sewers which were con-
              sidered homeowner ineligible.

         Upgrading On-Site Systems

              Upgrading on-site systems for lots inhabited prior to Decem-
              ber 1977  were  considered  eligible  for innovative and alter-
              native  funding.   The  number  of   eligible residences  was
              determined  from permits and  questionnaires.  All ineligible
              residences  were  assumed   to  require  minor upgrades  only.
              Low-flow  toilets  were considered  homeowner  ineligible.
For construction started after 30 September 1984 the Federal share will be
55% for conventional  systems  and 75% for  innovative  and  alternative sys-
tems (Federal Register,  Vol 47,  NO 92, May 12, 1982;  Changes in regula-
tions governing construction grants for treatment works).  The state share
after 30 September 1984 is not known at this time.
                                 F-2

-------
kl
i
e
•*•
•o
o
1-1
o
*u
m
u
«
r-l
Q

O

o

§
o


u
c
o
V
4-»
2
en
•a

+J
§

o
0.
M
M
3


a
u
3




9t
4

en




^




                 •»
                      •o
                       •


                      CM
•z
V
«>
4
a

a
a
o
u


CM
a
2
g
V
3
u
o
n .-*^
w o

o a
u o
u
u
u — i
53
CO -rt
a.
1-1 «
4 U
U
O 

•S2
"5
0 «
H
OOW
a u
** V

^M
M O
2 3

^
<0
0
-3

4 OO
• *
9> OO
CO CM
B
a
VI
0 s-.
M
in S
en a
u
[»*
P-l
• |
*M

JC^
SB
3
a ^4
3 4
e u
53



m

o
"*



15 u
u a
a o
e o


a a
U «J
-H a
^





P~ OO
CM CO
-O CM
CM





                      
-------

•v4
4J
S
kl
«
«J
^1
^
o
IM




4J
S
s

<
CM
M
g



— 1
a



O is.
• •
r4 in
^%

m
CO
^^
o
in
at
r*


e
1 •
00
00
*M






\£>
1
*-*
r^
ON


                                           sr    m
                                            •     •
                                           co    vr
   a.


-------
0)
(0
x: PH
M Bf
e u
2 S3
ata
h
U

M M ^*» M *»t <"•* M
x-»O ^.O MOO »«O
MO MO OOO OO


IOCM CM.H CMOf«- mO

H -^tN
rH CM ^ 00 O\ CM >tf
c en
ft 41
•0 «J _ ___
S 03

*4 *J
O *> «


2 a
/~* *~* M M
M M m in
\*' *~f **S ^^
CO 00 Cfl CO

0^ ' O ' -H ' vC
o
^ £
"o U
•^ u>

m a
o n
V


O IK
O
O
*4
5

"9

u a
« u
W O
a w ij
e
» ct)
x*» x^l ^^ /"^

m m m • m
co ao r» r»


oo m CM en

CM m o< m
Cfl QO O CO

-s»< ^,« ^.MM ^M
MO MO MOO MO
mo mo moo mo
^* ^^ ^X >-^ *•• ' Sp'
•»1N O>-l rfOr» «»>O
<4»n COO OICOiH »4 CM
-Hrt «> Sen* "*"*
W U
o
3 £ _ -
u
< 83
41 u
> >o
—i S
w £
a
u « "3
o <4 a
" . °3
a *~> — i
w n to -j
tt *J 3 tB
O o B U
u o 55
u -3 J
K — I
M M M M
m m m m
S S ^ S

co m M o>
• I • I •!! • I
CN m an m
cr> oo o CD
en en «H



i-. m ~o en
1 > 1 • 1*1 1 •
en M? r- CM

| S
CL V W

U B 3
O v •"
^0 " -H
M irt
09 19
•r) 41 W *J
C kt -4
a 4 -* a
-i 33
*^ O
B « H



CNCM m>M cnor*» CMO
Sm eno cMtOrJ mcM
~* m ^H oo c^ -*r **
•* ^ -» en CM


S ?
00 U
^ 0
(0 u
uu o> e 01
W & ^ -H pA Ci
li 115!
> ** e
32 g
8,
**> O

1 §
F* *J
^> at

to a to .4 « 41
a a o o = u 
** 01 *^ 01 fl> "^
tO^H GO M-^^W-a^H M
>, 41 jj >. 01 41 01 tii x> 41 0101.0 eg
M^H^ CArHfl HFH-rtd N»*i-l V4
3if ^5 SS-S1! 334J to
-H -Sf 41 u4fl kl
-------

_,
3
2
gg
*4
W U
«l B
x a
s ^*
u «
£*j
D
M
e M 41
i"< «J
«£ 0)
•O «
U «J U>
3 B
o a
•H U
-H O
o
£ 4!
a.
» U
p w
a 3-1
-1 U
<-< Vi
O V
•O -J

NW fel
O
ca
O
o

e
a
3 3
a *>
w B
a a
2 »
a <
o a.
« u
.3-3
a M
-* u
 On
.3
i
id
41
*J r-*
— i X w
< 4 a
u u
Q 4"!
NW «a i«i
• 3 «
0) x- . B U
<-> CO 53
a u -3 ,3
O CB - _-
U O
rl rj
52 'S-
a «4 *• a
o> g o


 O
£ O
0 09 H
H u
vi a
0
r-l 41
a u
*> b
s&
u5
« *J *-»
> c
vS «D C
.- i
A °
«• §
~t 4J
J3 »
t ><
H  o »* e
MO MO MO OC
NO**J VO>™* NO1"* 1— (r-
NOra cMr^ NO<** me

NOI*1 I"*O NOlH ^"fN
rH C*4 ^ ^1 <



_^
§ i i §

00 00 O CO
O> O O *d
•& f^ {*]






M M M M
lA >A U"> *O
oo oo GO r**


00 in 00 ON
• 1 • 1 • 1 1 • 1

§00
•4

**N r^t >*^ *"

MO MO MO MC
mo mo mo me
^-^ X^N^> N_r — ' ^-~
•»esi O-H NOO 
H r^ NO ^ « -a
r>4



M M M M
m m m m
S S £ C.


oo m oo ON
• i • I . • I I • I
CNI m o ft
O\ OO NO CO




r» m en f
1 • 1 • 1 • 1 1
m NO r» «"•








CMPJ m rf srn CMC
» • « » • i • •

O "^ m h* -* •:
S -» P> 4iua f- 4> « «j4J.a« «iu^
M rJ H « rJ S N r^ -rl a N rj T
rQ90 ^3 •H <0 AQr-
-H ,7 j) w^rg u ^T 41 a u -H i
0> 1-1 d « rj O Wl-tQO *J rH C
1 41 -rl 3 41 J3 B4I-HJ: d 0 f
s 3 c5 a
k


lA
> 1 •

\f)
i_i





•*
1 •
P*»
IT)
M










o
1 *

(N
•>
.-*
\
t

*
1 *
GO

^







0
1 •
M
CM
f*\
*^



1 -T CO

1 00 CO
CM If







OS

r4
• >T
NO
«-^












41
I *H U
1 W r-l
i a J3
1 li <4
' 3r?
CO) r-l
•H a a
3" 1
F-6

-------




a

gj 4^
a e
44 U
e o
41
b W
S. «
5 w
•o
§ c
3 *
~4 U
<2 4!
a.
a Ed
kl ^
*<5 

M M M U-i
O\ Ot O\ <— (
^-^ s^ •— » v^
CO 00 CO 00 CS
• 1 -1 • 1 1 * 1 1 »
ON O ?** NO *A
-» ^O «T> IA
w4





r4
a
V
•5
s



§
O
«H
e
•H
•S
3 c

: j
CD «C
3 £
2
u
*ff
V
>
ft
4J

— i
1



*~* /«K <*N /™V

m in in in
CO QO CO t*+

ao m o a\  CM
as QO wr oo o
en <£> ^ «o
M
Uo MO MO MO
tno mo mo mo
.H ^ t-i >-t _|i-4 esj^^
^M O»H ^m coo w
«*o*o QO o W^H ^**x m




•H
(Q
U
tt
•8
h


3 *s
< •£ — t in m ** ^ >-<
^H •* f*» M «
^

 e
S 5" S
a
^ I1
1 U
a.
§
«-t 4>
dD 0>
S &
p-l —* **H (fl
« a «f P-i « u
§B e o a >i tu
U -H 0 -H H >
** 0) «J W W "H 41
to r-4 » Jj «g fiVi "o ^ *4 <-i
COx-l'H rtfJg M^-l-Hfi N ^ -H )- ^
iV>fl**-r U i4 O *-H
-------



a
•H
a «J
4) S
X 4
w u
B O
41
U 41
§. 4

B CO
vO


S B
O 4
rH M
-J O
o
1.^ Ji
0.
a M
b CO
^
o
•o

o
a
o
o
o
B
•H
1
3 S
a 4
b
W 0
«J
o ft-
0 M
•w to
in

41
>
•H
8
M
41
*>
M
O i-l

• 3
a ,-\ B
wo 3
a «-> <
o a
0 0
o
41
hi -1
* H
0. 4
rn a a
« o -3
u **
o w a
— 1 O Ol

-g w 1-1
s u o
a a "
A^
S J
now
a
— i 41
2u
b
C 4^
la
V «J

3 5"

2
41
— 1
ft
S

~>
O
3











41
4

CO









2
41
2







4
J






4
91


£



^
1

^
4
O

'"*


—
3

rt


a
3









K
4>
B

§
U
g
4-1
an
$
~g ^g _ g ^
»« 0 MO M O >5
\P N C^ iH O CO !•••
. . . . • 1 » • 1 1
\D en r» O O ** ^
rH C4 in -^







**<•>«••* <-«

Cft Ox O> OS

00 00 o1^ O
• 1 • 1 » 1 1 • 1 1

•* f~ tM







in in in *n
00 CO 00 00

oo in oo CM
• i • I • i I • i i
 *»
1 • • I 1*1 1 •








CM CM in IH r*. m o>
. . . . • 1 • • I 1

O •-< m en **
i-H -» 00 CM






41 B 41
-* 0 ^ «J
*° « 5 c
bo tJ oo B
•H U -rl "
•1 ^ r-( 
4-» o> *J 41 q> «^ 4>
U)~4 0) ki, 0) J3 > a V 4)41^4) 4) 0) J2 "S J3
« -( -H U)F*C N -J -H C H^t^l u«4
A90 -OS •H^aov ^£ao Mao
4»tH-^ bvfO *H-HTfO *^^v^ a-f*
UtjQi^ VfiDCU 4oa'-14) 4hQ>-4 *Hi-(
^( J* U »J ^T | M -?f 11 H Ll -H U C 11
0) H C Q-4O <-" -H C 5 V" -J C -^B
i4i-H a t> js c o -H x: eaiT^ a -rf
5^4 U 4) -M
U (J 0 <
F-8

-------





a

B «
at e
,c «
c u
V
rf W
» *•
Q. CO
e £
>a

41 ri
-> B
o a
o
« i
hi M
CO ....
4-1
1-4
O


0
a
o
o
o
rH
e
 Q
« 5
a <
o eu
U W
~ S
m

w
v4
1
V
rH X
O
O rH
(«H «tl
• U
2-3- g
a u 9
o a
u O
u
V
a *3 -o
,£ *** V
Q) *H **
O. <0
rH M S
3 ° 3
o >M a
rH O U

•82 3
"-- p
2 » «-
e o>
0 M
b <9
00 w
a
rH 41
a u
u u
s^
« r>

^
1
_«
41

^5


rH
<0
o
3









«
a

to




rH
q
u
01
•8
ft.





4
CJ
3







ft
03
V
*j
5



W
8
^
•H
a
1




u
00
^

eg
w

i










«j
i
a
!
u
!

w
f? P »<
r% O <— O r-, O f*.
MO MO MO M
\O rH \O rH SjO rH \O
Vp/ s^
SO CH CSJ r-t (SO fS ^ OS

rH CM ^ rH O





.
^s r-s ^^ /-v
Si £. £• S

oo oo n o os

O\ O rv CM .os
•^ VO CM (TI
rH

*rs *-s -TH ^

in m m in
S S S £


oo m •» « os
• I • i -II • i I •
CM in in oo rH
OS OO CT» O CM
>0 <^
^
r^ —> ^-.
MO MO MO M
in O i/> o IA o in

-e^CM OrH rH o CM
OS 00 SO CM m
rH



r» m oo r- •» rH
1 • • 1 1 • t 1 . • •

CM m







CMCM inrH inps, o\ t*.
OS C*S c*> O f** rH »T OS
o -•  CM m
rH








« C 01
rH O rH r*
.0-1 jo o
01 « «l rH "3 S
§g c o a ui  -H E3-r< M
d r-t a» o> ti o
O U O Q < H
F-9

-------
3
a

4J
e
«
u
§.
                     H!


                  M O
                  yp i-*:



                  C7v O
                                     MOO
                                     O O O
                                     O -3- «-O


                                     I** oo *n
           gg
                                                rH O


                                                rH SO
                  M
                  e»
                  o
                   • i
                  in
                  oo
                                                so
                                                sr
§
o
is
o
o
<
SB
                     O
                     es
                            M O
                            m o
                            O rH
                             •  •

                            co o
                            m
                            oo
                            m
                             • i
                                     o  v
o to

:*
M rH
« gt
   a

35
o 
00

i


4)
»H
X>

5
                            in

                            so
                     -»   o

                     co   *a>
                     CM   in
          •* VI

          |3
         t-i a

         I3
                                     en -» so
                                                              en

                                                              SO
                                                              o
                                                              SO
                     41
                  •H a
                              5    5
                                         rU
                                         A   e
                                         rH   «

                                         g   «•
                                       rH  U   -O
                                     4) A  41   41
  "o* a    2
rH  6 O    W
01 -H J=    C

          U
                                                »i C
                                                01 -H
41   rH
B   a
                            F-10

-------



D
CJ
3
CO
Tt
«l B
j: a
V b
B O
»
M 01
a w
a ,
5 M 2
>4 a
TJ f
5 *> to
5 B
O a)
*4 hi
~H 0
O
w £
a u
u tn
a => -i
•H a)
>-i kt
O «,
•o -5
V
Ud £
o

a
§
o

B
1 1
«J w
*• B
a a
 &•
-rf

B
u
* 81
O i-l
W CO — 1
S 9
CO *~t B CJ
u 
10 O
u u
ss.
§ 01
Ll J=
U « 44
1^- 1
§
1
Cn O
1 U
t s
.-4 M
ja g)
i2 5
SJ >J jj ^f
'-NO —v O '-N O MC
Mo MO MO O C
Ntf*^ i£ N«/ s£ S«< ^--C

ChO CMiH CMN dC
. . . . • l • .
mr-« r«*o ^nen *-« M
N o> «n m





/"S
-*s <^s ^-N M
?! S S 3
^ ^. s^ .^^
O QO oo r*»
•I -I • i I •
*A O ^? *^
M M M M
kn m m m
23 5° *, C'


r> tn ^ <
* i • I • l I •
*o to 04 en
m co CT» «">
n c^ CN
•
^

fx~* M ^N ^
MO MC
»n o *n c
(7. O O^4 O C^ OO C
y\ t^ QQ O CO ~4 ai^ >>D4i a>w^a> oiai^
U) ~l •* ta^B N -J -H a N -1 v
A«0 J3 3 -rt ^> SO 3 -H JO 0
W-HT4 WlTlO' iH-H-75 — 1 T< -^
«J G£F* V sfl CJ « OO'H 41 4 fifi*-
^ ^f 0> 
(
t

*

j r^-
* 1 •
> CP>
J CM
M







en
1 *
0

CM










m
i •
r*
•O
av
»

s
1
>
if
5 i °.
> o
) *
•tf






n

r*.


^H

i xt m

'<  <•»,

) ^
> CM
CM












4>
•H 41
W — 1
hi Vl
1 
-------





0)
•ft
0 w
« B
£ 4
u U
a o
V
M 4J
3
B w
«
1 IS
0 4
<2
** a.
0) W


rH
rH
o
""
o

a
o
o
o

e
"**
•$
2 ^
e 4
«j
a, <
O DM
0 U
S3
U
41
>
•H
I
3 X
u
O rH
lu 4
3
0~ B
*> o 5
9 *J  a H
e v
5,2
a
i-l U
*> kl
B 91
« a.

« 5
1^
o
^*
41
H



4
3









a>
4
«






a
41
t*J








a
u





rH
4

1



^J
3

iH
4
U




*»




4
T^
a








*j
a
On
1
6
V
a
MM M ^-.M
.-. 0 '-O ^ O MO
MO MO MO O O -
2-^x SC £• w» WN-t
OVO C4 -4 W«M r-IQ r*
(n t** r^ o O ("1 i*^ M? 00
P4 00 fn * *4
C^4




^^
U M M m
O> OS OK M^

O 00 >9 ^ O^
« O O X> <^
rH CM



M M M M
m m m m
oe ao^ oo ^
^ m ^ -i
"^ 1 "^ I *ll "^1 1 ^
m oo c»i «"> -j
en — i «N oo
• •
"^

^^ >*N ^ y^
MO MO MO MO
mo mo mo mo
ii d^_- d> •— •-"_•
o>o o-< \OCM ooo i^
<*^ go §'" SS S
CM •*


M M M M
S S S C-

• 1 • 1 -II -1 1 •

in ao m en ^H
H

o. m -o 0 -» ^
1 • • i i . 1 1 • • •
rH SO rH 
(ArHiH CArHe NrH*4B MrHiH UT^
MMkrH f«0al aoCl-'HQI 4?OrH T^rH
^, ^7 41 w iT S Li^fUB U -H 4< C«l — 1
" lu -H 9a.fi e'v-S.s c "3 5 B -H w
F-12

-------


a


0)
Tis
V
X
jj
e
41


^


V

o
p-l
o
IU
a
b
O
iH
— 1
O


IH
O
M
i-4 o

-g 01
c u
5
a n
a a
2 «?
*e
9 U
w b
13 01
i *
1 «
« **
3 51
•H
,-4
i
V
.0
S


a
u
3

c
a
b
O

£i
*
co a
•o a

w ca
e
n)
b

£
w
SM
a
b

••M

Eb






"il
0
4J
B
a)
O
^
b
M
"g
W

o
hi



X "w
SJ

i-(
§«
B U
53




•8*
w a
|3

0 0
H w

33
o
H







B
01
a
g
1

i
w
a

~O I? 0 0 >?'
MO O O O O C
•n as -» v\ so in c
o •* o «* **•• -sj- %
in ^ m s
CM «*> r
H




^-\ >< M*
H m m
Si C
ITS so SO
• 1 'II •
0 in ^
fv oo
l**1



^^ ^^ ^%
MM M
* C li



CO OS OO
r» o
00 ~»

^H
^M —MM ^.f
MO MOO MC
in o in o o me
_| .4 fM rf iH CM -
•a- as o crs so —ic
i-f ** s0 ^ en so <
«M •» n <
so m iH f
.H"
^-s ^^ *—\
MM M
in in in
CO I- •»
CM OS CM
• 1 • 1 1 •
00 f- 00
r~ O
CO -»
•H



*£f CA I**
1 * 1*1 1
0 0 .-
en -










SO O\ Qs ot sfi "41 C


O -* •» S
•ft n in r-
CM -H





Q 01
-.si
U 00 B
•U 'T* **
(0 F-I 6) V
g 3 5 £
« U 0) 4
U rH ^ <-< b no i-
P^ m jj uu^oi v v £
U>,-4vl N^vlg Hi-lv

u M)-« eg M— i a rg ja>-
THWO> MvfOie b^<4
n>Ha w ^ c o w^c
lOllH BOI-Hj: C « -r
e cj 41
o u o
t
3
>
^
> 00
• 1 •
r CM
r o
H 00
*



,



,-j

CO
m









en

-I
en
CM

CM
S
t
>
>
4
rf
i cn
' o
r so
4 CM
CM




in

•sr
as
CM
«M



1 •» CM

1 CO -H










> CM
• 1 •
p m
r in
H in
^









41
i 71.2
ig A
1 b -1
f*J Ml
a> ^T
1 -H _l
» B 01 M
•rt O »
1 S -rt W
3 (5
F-13

-------






3
a
i
B
U
M
»
a.

5

'O
9
5
o
p-l
O
a
hi
id
i-H
O


SH
O
0)
rH
B


1
4^
a

01
CO
o
o

t-Q


V

-H
1
4J
o

•
40 ^*>
w a
a w
o a
o o
0
2 H
g «
o £
o.
*H a
a o
o
O IM
•* 0
•8 2
*S
a B
e v
9 DO
u 0
««
a
•H 11
a u
w w
e u
a> a

M J=
a* w
>

3 JJ
CM
[i.
i









B
U
U

W

a
M




B
a
u
ou
u

9









^t
e

£
^
a.
bl
=>






"a
o




SN
^ o
MO MO
\O ^ \O *H

in os >n as
o •» oo in
o





Nt 14

V
*-»
(0

CO



*"* v"
as oo
• 1 • i i
0 «M

01


M «


•3
u
01
*w
«



f4
I



m in
<0 00
^ ^^
(N (s*
• 1 -II

in
»
MO MO
in o in o
i-4 pH ^4 *H
-or os i*"* os
*•* •«* <-* in
CM
in

•7 »?



2
01


pu

§1
rH
9) --"
9 a
Jo
3
^^

S *

(SI (SI
• I • I I
OO -!
m
9s


1 * 1 * 1
0 «M
<^






"8 M
w a
a o
3s

SZ
•H
-1 0
33




\o «•* *n ON
• * • 1 *
5
 tt J3 S 01 ^> «
«J r-l Tl N -H -H C
A 90 ^ -O OP §
« -rl »T rH -H •if O
w M)t«4 ta oa>H a>
•H -rT 01 U -rT »> S
m H 6 « H d 5
1 *> -H B 01 i-l .3
S 3
^ JJ
M O
O O


m o

2
a
iH
i


F-14

-------

a
•H
a
V

B

U
a)
a.

B
•H
1
0

•2



a
^
o

IM
O
a
o
o
o
^
5
_

a

a>
4-t
a
O

"-"
Oj
rx

V
M
a
B
41
3
U
O
"4-*
•
* XX
«J V
0) tJ
o a
u o
u
a v
£ u

o.
i-< B
a u
u
0 
2§?
SO M
a o
c v
o a.

n *•
O X
W J3

3
a.
01


5





e
u
O

V

a

CO
*
e

6
^i
a*
M








a
S



xx O xx O
XX XX ^ XX
in ON *j& ON
. . . i .
e - a

B O
v>l
4J i-^
SOJ
*J
f-^ O
33
o
H




vo ON rx ON
• . • I •
ON ^ *D in
£

!»>






0 V
O "t
•S A
U 94
5 ?
B


I
"
!


51
tt c-4 Q|
§ cS 5
*-» 4r (U
(fl f-| -rt rH P
>> 41 ^ 41 O J* 0)
CO M) ^| M <-4 -H C
.0 ^ ^ .a ^ |
«J oO>~' * GO*"""' Q>
W -JT 41 Li -H 4) B
«Q rH C *-» -H C 0

SMI
Q
II
m o

»n *»






M!
in
ft
^"^
2 '
CO


^^

in
f*.



S
•*




XX
xxM
Kg
Cii

-^ o

22 .
^
M

^

CM
• I
1







m
i •
d
^4









<*> O

-» •»
m H










B
I
4)
£

•e ^
SQJ 
CM rx









^
1

i

m











0
5 «
S3
Ll Vj

•H rf
C 4) -1
•H c a
B -rt U
3 5
F-l 5

-------
       I-£8

       si»
             v
       »   b  o
       oo~4 «i  e
       aj a a. «
       n 3
 e
 a
 b
 CO
 a
 w
 10
I
•H   «.
«^
e
w
3    a
    o
a   O
v
a

0)
•*
~4


10
          J— I w
          « C
          o m

        a J 3
    B
5
      O
3  O
          a
          u 
-------
                4)
             no
          H V B
           rg a, u
        < < Q 41
             O (2
                «
          c a en
        < < q it
             U «
                     *O M t7» CJ* <7^ ON <
                                              o o <
                                              ^ ^ <
 14
 41
•s
 o    w
 S
3
B
a
 oa
 to
 L.

 >
          5 g g
          •333
           3    111
          | 23
        e  > o
        o^    ^
        <  3    "0
             _ia*
             O
             u
                       -    rf iH   r* >N c  

                                                              3   S   5
                                                             H    
-------






00
*l
e
«
oo

"a
e

c
01
!
^
c
1
4J
•s

n
to
o

u
o
3
^

W
g
3

u
V

„
s

tt.
rH
J3
a
H

11
10
4
01
«)
2
Ql
>
<




















"*
O
O
rH
"•"
a
o
O















••4
c
5
^
.c
c

*



o
00
a\
rH


a
cS
3
C











rH
O
1

















f>
hi
V
a.
I
b
QJ
4J
CO
3

<*•
O
g
*
^


1-4
1
M
0
+J


^
3
3
e
41




4J
1
4
T<
3
&
u




rH
id
T<
a.
c3







i
V
o
e
*
a
£
u
c
3
a
01
OS

1

"8
g
V


a
g
3
0
£



£
>a
0



X
ID
JZ
o
Q
J


O



0
O
"

01
5

kJ
01
4H
«J«

<• 00 00 •*
CM rH -H *»
^ in in rH
CM in p. r>


o m CM o\
CM -» 
O iH en rH
n CM co p*
rH rH -H






in M> CM o
•^ o> m rH
u> m m •*
CM rH pfc SO
-H rtrH




<; ca




CM
g


oo
in





i




rH
P»
rH
CM



n-
P.
•*





^
tn
rH






^0"
rH
SO
rH




S



cn
en
•"•

CM
rH
\0





0
en



M9
Ov
CM
CM



en
NO
in





cn
rH






OTs
m
SO
rH




m



CO CM so O so OO CM
o so rH in in c>s p«»
rH p^ CM in o o in
p- cji ON 00 •» cn CM

os rH ao in cn o\ *M


-1 rH -H




01 in in m o o o
en en en cn en cn en



in cn p~ -* CM in in
Os r» oo so oo o o
rH CM O OO •* rH 
•H
4J
2
a
3
a
•g
0)

rH
U
s
CM










































CM
CM
1
CM
£

pS
1
en
F-18

-------
         Appendix G
Impacts of On-site Wastewater


  Treatment  Systems on Soils
                                                                &

                                                                o
(U
4-1
to

CO

4J
c


4-1
ts
tu
                                                                0)
                                                                4J
                                                                (0
                                                                9
                                                                01
                                                                4-1
                                                                (0
                                                                (0
                                                                3

                                                                
                                                                4-1
                                                                -H
                                                                CO


                                                                O

                                                                M-l
                                                                O

                                                                to
                                                                4-1
                                                                O
                                                                i

                                                                o

                                                                X
                                                                H
                                                                w
                                                                PM

-------

-------
                                IMPACTS  ON  SOILS

     The  application  of septic tank effluent  to  soil in the operation  of  the
cluster  drainfields  (Alternatives 3 through  6)  and  on-site systems  (alter-
natives  2  through 7)  will have  an  impact on  the amount  of  prosphorus  and
nitrogen  in the soil.

     Phosphorus would  be present  in septic  tank  effluent in an inorganic form
as  orthophosphate (primarily  HPO  -2),  as polyphosphates  (or condensed phos-
phates),  and as organic phosphate compounds.  Because the pH is alkaline,  the
predominant form  usually  is  orthophosphate  (USEPA  1976).   Polyphosphate is
converted  quickly to orthophosphate  in conventional wastewater treatment, in
soil, or in water.  Dissolved  organic phosphorus  is converted more  slowly (day
to weeks)  to orthophosphate.

     When  septic  tank effluent is applied to  soils, dissolved inorganic phos-
phorus (orthophosphate)  may be adsorbed by  the iron, aluminum, and/or calcium
compounds,  or may be  precipitated through  with  soluble iron,  aluminum,   and
calcium.   Because it  is difficult to distinguish between  adsorption and pre-
cipitation reactions,  the  term "sorption" is  utilized to refer to  the removal
of phosphorus by  both processes (USEPA and  others 1977).  The degree to which
phosphorus is sorbed  in soil  depends on  its concentration,  soil pH, tempera-
ture, time, total loading, and the concentration of other  wastewater consti-
tuents that directly react  with phosphorus,  or  that  affect soil  pH and oxi-
dation-reductions  (USEPA and others 1977).

     The  phosphorus in  the absorbed phase in  soil exists  in equilibrium with
the concentration of dissolved  soil phosphorus (USEPA and others 1977).  As an
increasing amount of existing  adsorptive capacity  is used, such as  when  waste-
water enriched with phosphorus  is applied, the dissolved phosphorus concentra-
tion of  phosphorus in  the percolate,  and   thus  in  the  groundwater or  in  the
recovered  underdrainage water.

     Eventually, adsorbed  phosphorus is transformed into a crystalline-mineral
state, re-establishing  the adsorptive  capacity  of  the  soil.  This transfor-
mation may occur  slowly,  requiring from  months  to years.   However,  work by
various researchers indicate  that  as much as  100% of the  original adsorptive
capacity may be  recovered  in  as little as 3 months.  In some instances  it may
take years for the adsorptive capacity  to  fully recover  because  the  active
cations may become  increasingly bound  in the  crystalline  form.   The possible
amount of  phosphorus  that  could precipitate to the crystalline form, based on
a 2%  to 4$ iron and 5% to 7.5%  aluminum  soil  content,  is estimated  to be
250,000 pounds of phosphorus per acre-foot  of soil (Ellis and Erickson  1969).

     Dissolved organic  phosphorus can  move  quickly  through permeable  soils.
Adequate retention of the wastewater in the  unsaturated soil  zone is necessary
to allow  enough  time  for  the  organic  phosphorus to  be hydrolized by  micro-
organisms  to  the orthophosphate form.   In the  orthophosphate  form,  it then can
be adsorbed.

     Nitrogen  loadings  in  the septic   tank  effluent  are of  greatest  concern
because of the  potential for well contamination  by  nitrates.  Nitrogen would
be present  in applied wastewater principally in the form of ammonium (NH.) and
organic nitrogen.  When  septic tank effluent  is applied to soils,  the natural
                                      G-l

-------
 supply of  soil nitrogen  is  increased.  As in the natural processes, most added
 organic nitrogen slowly  is  converted to ionized ammonia by microbial action in
 the  soil.   This  form of nitrogen, and any ionized ammonia in the effluent, is
 adsorbed by soil particles.

     Plants  and  soil microbes both utilize  ammonium directly.   Microbes oxi-
dize ammonium  to  nitrite (NO ) that is quickly converted to the nitrate (NO )
 from  through  nitrification. 2 Nitrate  is  highly  soluble  and  is  utilized By
 plants, or leached  from the soil  into  the  groundwater.   Under anaerobic con-
ditions (in  the  absence of oxygen) , soil nitrate  can be reduced by soil mic-
robes  to  gaseous  nitrogen  forms  (denitrification).   These  gaseous forms move
upward through the  soil atmosphere and are dissipated into the air.  Denitri-
fication depends on organic carbon for an energy  source;  thus, the interface
between natural  soil and  the gravel  fill  in a drain bed  has  both requisite
characteristics for denitrification.

     Unlike  phosphorus,  nitrogen  is  not  stored  in soil  except  in  organic
matter. Organic matter  increases  within the soil  would  result  from increased
microbial  action  and from decreased oxidation.  The increased  organic matter
improves the soil  tilth (workability), water holding capacity, and capability
of retaining plant nutrients.
                                    G-2

-------
        Appendix  H
Excerpts from the  Report on Algae
                                                                  
-------

-------
              Excerptsfrom the Report  on Algae  (USEPA  1982).
Excerpts were taken from the Report  on Algae  to provide summaries and conclusions
regarding the major topical areas covered.  The full Report on Algae was originally
published and distributed by USEPA Region V in January of  1982.  This report was
prepared as a supporting technical reference  document for  the Environmental Impact
Statement on the Moose Lake-Windemere  Sanitary District's  proposed wastewater
treatment system.  Complete copies of  the Report on Algae  are available from the
Project Monitor.
  2.3.5.   Summary of Blue-Green Algal  Toxicity

       Three  genera of  freshwater blue-green  algae,  Anacystis,  Anabaena  and
  Aphani zomenon,  are  most commonly  associated  with  toxin production  and  have
  been reported to produce several  different types of toxins.   The toxicological
  and pharmacological  properties of the toxins as well as their chemical identi-
  ties are  not well understood.   In addition,  very little  is  currently known
  about the physiological  and/or  ecological factors  and  interactions  that  lead
  to toxic episodes.

       There  is  well documented  evidence,  however,  that blue-green  algae  can
  produce   toxic  effects  in  animals  and  livestock.   Livestock  and  wildlife
  poisonings occur most frequently  in lakes,  reservoirs, and  ponds in temperate
  climates.  Toxic  blooms usually occur  between late spring  and  early autumn.
  Toxic effects  in  animals  can  occur only  through ingestion  of  contaminated
  water.   A variety of  toxic  effects have been  documented in  the laboratory and
  from observations  of  livestock  and  wildlife  populations and  include convul-
  sions,  gastrointestinal  disorders,  respiratory disorders,  liver  failure,  and
  death.   There are, however,  no documented  or reported cases  of human mortality
  associated with toxic  strains of  freshwater  blue-green algae.

       Although more than  12  species  belonging  to 9 genera of freshwater cyano-
  phytes have  been implicated  in cases of  animal poisoning, toxic strains of the
  three most   common  bloom forming  species,  Microcystis aeruginosa,  Anabaena
                                     H-l

-------
 flos-aque,  and  Aphanizomenon flos-aque have been responsible for the majority
 of  the documented episodes.   (In the literature, Anacystls is used synonymosly
 with   the  genus  Microcystijs.)   The  poisonings  attributable  to  Anabaena^
 flos-aque have  been more dramatic in terms of the number of animals affected,
 but toxic  strains  of  Micrpcyst1s  aeruglnosa appear  to be more  widely dis-
 tributed  geographically.

     To date, twelve  different  toxins have been identified from strains and/or
 blooms of the three most common toxlgenic species.  The  toxins differ In their
 reaction  time  and  their  chemical  structure.  Several of  the  toxins are very
 fast-acting  and are  suspected of  being alkaloids.   Some have  a  pronounced
 latent period  following ingestion  and are suspected  of being peptides.  The
 available  evidence  also  indicates  that  a  single  bloom may  contain  several
 different toxins simultaneously.

     Investigations into  the nature  and  occurrence of  toxic  blooms of blue-
 green  algae  indicate  that  such  blooms  have a  highly variable and  mosaic
 nature.   The development  of  toxic blooms Is unpredictable  and  usually occurs
 in  short-lived  pulses.   They infrequently recur in the  same  body of water in
 subsequent years.  The fact that bloom toxicity is so varied and unpredictable
 makes any bloom potentially  dangerous  and  suspect at all  times,  even though
 the majority are actually nontoxlc.

     There  have been several  documented episodes  of toxic blue-green  algae
blooms in southern Minnesota.  Toxic blooms  are rare,  however,  In the northern
part of the state.
                                 H-2

-------
3.3.  Summary of the Causes of Swimmers' Itch

     Swimmers' itch can be cercarial related or blue-green algae related.  Man
is  not  a  host  or  "carrier"  of the  schistosome  which causes  the  cercarial
dennatitus form of  swimmers  itch.  Therefore human waste  (excrement)  can not
be  responsible  for the presence of this more severe type  of  swimmers'  itch.
However,  the blue-green   algae   blooms  which are 'responsible  for  the  less
serious form  of dermatitus  can   in part  be caused by  an  influx of  nutrients
from human waste.
                                    H-3

-------
4.0.   PHYTOPLANKTON COMMUNITY STRUCTURE AND EVIDENCE OF PUBLIC HEALTH PROBLEMS:
       MOOSE LAKE, MINNESOTA

     Four  lakes  in  the Moose  Lake-WIndermere  Sanitary District  were  inves-
tigated  to gather baseline  information  on phytoplankton  community structure
and  on existing  water  quality.  The  objective  of this  investigation  was to
evaluate the  relative  abundance of blue-green algae  in  the four lakes and to
assess  potential  problems  associated with  blooms of  blue-green  algae.   A
secondary  purpose was to determine If cercarial dermititus  (swimmers' itch) is
a problem  in  the Moose Lake area.  The Moose Lake-Windermere Sanitary District
is  located in  eastern  Minnesota  between Minneapolis  and Duluth.   The  four
lakes  that  were  studied  are  Island,  Sturgeon,   Rush,  and Passenger  Lakes
(Figure 4-1).

     The description  and evaluation of  the phytoplankton  community structure
was  based  on lake  sampling  and water quality data analysis.   Information on
blue-green toxicity events and swimmers'  itch outbreaks was gathered in inter-
views  with local physicians  and  veterinarians as  well  as  with state  health
officials.

4.1.  Phytoplankton Community Structure

4.1.1.  Description of Phytoplankton Community Structure

     Phytoplankton community  structure is  determined  primarily through  inter-
actions   Involving   physical-chemical  factors,   zooplankton,   and   fish.
Typically, the  dominance of  a phytoplankton community by a particular species
will shift during  the  course of a year.   That  is,  a  particular phytoplankton
species  may  form the   greatest  proportion  of  the  algal community  biomass
(weight of living  matter)  only  at certain times of the year when the interac-
tions  taking  place within  the water body favor that particular phytoplankton.
As the aquatic  ecosystem changes  during  the year,  numerous interactions occur
that may,  in  sequence,  favor other phytoplankton.   For  example,  in eutrophic
lakes diatoms may be the dominant phytoplankton in  the spring because they are
favored by high silicate concentrations,  high  light peneration,  and cool water
temperatures  present  at that time of  the  year.   In early  summer  as silicate
                                  H-4

-------
Figure 4-1. Locations of mid-lake sampling stations
            for phytoplankton, nutrient, temperature,
            dissolved oxygen and chlorophyll data.
                       H-5

-------
 concentrations  decrease,  green algae may become dominant because of increased
 water  temperatures  and  increased nutrient availability.  As water temperature
 reaches the late summer peak, and as dissolved nitrate levels decrease follow-
 ing  uptake by  green algae and by  rooted  aquatic plants, blue-green algae may
 become dominant.  In late summer blue-green algae hold an advantage over other
 algal species when levels of phosphorous are high compared to nitrogen because
 blue-greens alone  can fix  atmospheric nitrogen into  a  useful nutrient form.
 In  addition,  blue-green  algae  use  their  unique  gas  vacuoles  to  remain in
 position at the water surface and take advantage of the diminished sunlight as
 well as shade out other algae found deeper in the water column.

     Algal groups such as blue-greens, diatoms, or greens are characterized as
 dominant  based on  biovolume  measurements  micrometers  cubed  per  millillter
   3
 Gum /ml).  Biovolume Is  a parameter which generally reflects  biomass.   It is
 expressed in this  Report  as a volume of plankton per unit volume of water and
 is therefore indicative of visible accumulations of living matter.

     Phytoplankton samples  were collected  from  Island  Lake  (6 stations) and
 Sturgeon Lake (4 stations) on four sampling dates during late summer and early
 autumn.  Passenger and  Rush Lakes were sampled on three dates during the same
 period at one  station  in the middle of each the lakes.  Phytoplankton samples
 were taken in  each  instance at one meter below the surface, at raid-depth, and
 at one  meter  from  the  bottom.  The  sampling station locations  are  shown in
 Figure 4-1.   Algal  identification was taken at least to the genus level and to
 the species  level  where possible.  Phytoplankton dimensional measurements were
made of the  most numerous phytoplankton species found.   Measurements for other
 less numerous  phytoplanktons  were  taken from unpublished  species lists  for
Minnesota lakes (by  letter,  Nancy Holm, Liranological  Research Center, Univer-
sity of Minnesota) and  from Wetzel (1975).   The  list  of  phytoplankton volumes
used to  calculate  biovolumes  in this  investigation  is  Included in  Appendix
A-3.    Chlorophyll  a_ samples  were  collected concurrent  with  phytoplankton
 sampling on  two dates at  the  same sample locations and depths.   Secchi disk
depth was measured  at all sample sites and on all sample  dates.

 Island Lake
     Phytoplankton   biovolume   (abundance)   and   the  percent   composition
(dominance)  of  major  phytoplankton  groups  for Island  Lake at  the  surface,
                                    H-6

-------
mid-depth, and  bottom depths  are  depicted in Figure 4-2.   From 26 August to
September  9  there was  an overall  decrease In  algal  density and  a dramatic
shift In  algal  dominance.  The decrease in algal density was due primarily to
the decline of  the large dinoflagellate,  Ceratium hirundinella,  which had an
                               3
estimated  volume  of  75,000  um  per  organism.   Over this  same  time period a
                                                          3
large blue-green  species, Anabaena  macrospora   (45,000 Aim   per  organism) and
another blue-green,  Aphanizorcenon flos-aquae (2800 >um  per organism)  grew in
                                                               3
number while a  smaller  blue-green, Phormidium mucicol_a (10 .urn  per organism)
decreased  in  number.  Thus,  although the  total  blue-green algae cell number
per ml remained  relatively  constant from 26 August to 9 September, because of
the shift  from  small blue-green algae species to large-sized blue-green algae
species and declines  in other phytoplankton (the dinoflagellates declined from
77%  to  less  than 1% of the  phytoplankton biovolume),  blue-green  algae in-
creased from  16%  to 94% of  the total phytoplankton biovolume.    For  the re-
mainder  of September,  blue-greens  were 'dominant in  Island  Lake, with the
blue-green abundance  reaching a  peak around the  September 14  sampling date
(Table 4-1).

     Throughout  the  sampling  period  (26  August  to  October  5)  Island  Lake
consistently  had  the highest  phytoplankton density of the four lakes inves-
tigated.    High  blue-green algal  and other  phytoplankton densities in Island
Lake  also contributed  to poor  water  clarity.   Island  Lake had  the lowest
Secchi disk  readings of  the four  lakes.   The   changes in  the average Island
Lake Secchi disk  readings were followed closely by the changes in phytoplank-
ton abundance (Figure 4-3a and b).

Sturgeon Lake

     Changes  in phytoplankton  abundance and dominance in the water column for
the  four  Sturgeon Lake  sampling dates  are shown in  Figure 4-4.   The total
phytoplankton biovolume  in  Sturgeon  Lake  was  lower  than  in  Island Lake but
blue-green algae  were  still  the dominant  phytoplankton  group throughout the
month  of  September.   The   dominant  blue-green  species  was  Anacystis  spp.
Diatoms were  an important component of the phytoplankton community in Sturgeon
Lake  on   all  four sampling  dates  and were  found at  all  depths  but never
accounted for more than  24%  of the  phytoplankton biovolume.  Based on Secchi
disk readings, water clarity was observed to be much greater in Sturgeon Lake
than in Island Lake (Figure 4-3a).
                                     H-7

-------
                                 ISLAND   LAKE
 Oft
 10ft
 20ftJ
 Oft
 9ft-
                 26 AUGUST 1981
            bio volume in Jim  x 10
            t   35   79   11 13 15  17  19
                           9	I   I
                                  12% blue-green
                                 25Z blue-green
                                             11-
                        T^.121 blue-green
                             19ft1
                 14  SEPTEMBER  1981
           biovolume in jun^ x 10^
           1   35   7   9  U  13 15  17  19
                    98Z blue-green
                  98Z blue-
                     green
                                           13ff
18ftJ

Figure  4-2.
                            98Z blue-green
                                              9  SEPTEMBER 1981
                                       biovolume in JHB  x 10
                                       1  35  7  9  11  13  15  17 19
                                                                       i   t  t
                                                                       9AZ blue-green
                                                      95Z blue-green
                                                                92Z blue-green
                                             30 SEPTEMBER 1981
                                       biovolume in unr* x 106
                                       1   35   7   9  U  13 15  17  19
942 blue-green
                                                   94Z blue green
Abundance and  dominance of  major phytoplankton  forms based
on biovolume data.  Derived from plankton counts  made on
samples taken  from Island Lake on  four sampling dates.
Depths  of samples are approximately  as shown.
                                         H-8

-------
                                                3      4
 Table  4-1.      Blue-green  algal  biovolumes Gum  x  10 /ml)  of  four lakes  in
                the Moose Lake area and four lakes from  southern  Minnesota  (the
                Minneapolis-St.  Paul area).  Blue-green  algae genera  listed are
                those  most  commonly associated with  incidences  of  blue-green
                algae  toxicity in  North America.
 Location/
  Date

 Island Lake
 26 August 1981
  9 September 1981
 14 September 1981
 30 September 1981

 Sturgeon Lake
 27 August 1981
  9 September 1981
 15 September 1981
  5 October 1981

 Passenger Lake
 10 September 1981
 15 September 1981
  1 October 1981

 Rush Lake
 10 September 1981
 15 September 1981
  1 October 1981
Anabaena spp.
      61
     671
    1336
      92
      30
      41
      74
      30
       0
      14
       5
      30
      27
       0
Anacystis spp.
    17
     7
    11
     8
    58
   102
    66
    48
    18
    14
     2
     0
    24
     4
Aphani zomenon
  f]os-aquae
     67
    169
    466
    358
      0
      1
      0
      1
      0
      0
      0
      0
      0
      0
Sampling
  Depth
Surface
Surface
Surface
Surface
Cedar Lake, MN
   9 September 1974      14

Lake Harriet, MN
 22 July 1974            41

Lake of the Isles, MN
  22 July 1974          476

Lake Calhoun, MN
 26 August 1974         232
                                        169


                                        297


                                        460


                                        544
                                  2 meters
                                  2 meters
                                  Surface
                                  Surface
                                     H-9

-------
          >,*»
          I.JO
          J.K>
          1.50
          1.10
          J.JO
          ).20
          1.10
        5 l.oo
        2 '•"
          2.IW

        :«.»
        : ,.»
        • J.*o
        I 2.30
        5 J.JO
        3 1.19
        ' 1.00
          ,.»
          >.»
          I.JO
          i.w
          1.50
          I.W
          i.x
                           WATER  CLARITY
                    (SECCHI  DISK MEASUREMENTS)
              26 ».,u.c
~\—I	1
 X>  I Oec. J Oct
Figure  4-3a. Average  Secchi disk values  for  the project  area lakes
             versus time.  Data are  from 19.81  field  surveys.

                      PHYTOPIANKTON ABUNDANCE
            (BIO-VOLUME ESTIMATES FROM CELL COUNTS)
       10 -
       90 —
      l«l —

      200 .
      1000 -


      1500 -

      2000 -
                                                      I
                                                     10
                                                     Sne.
Figure 4-3b.  Average phytoplankton biovolumes for the project area lakes
             versus time.  Plotted data are representative of the
             photic zones of the lakes,as only samples from just below
             the surface of the water were taken into the averages.

-------
                              STURGEON   LAKE
                27  AUGUST
           biovolume  In urn x 10
           I   35   79  11 13 15  17  19
 Oft
 9ft
19ft
                 76Z blue-green
69Z blue-green
                 73Z blue-green
                                        9  SEPTEMBER

                                   biovolume in um x 10
                                    1   35  7   9  11 13  15  17 19
                          Oft
                                            84Z blue-green
   90Z blue-green
                                          69Z blue-green
                 15  SEPTEMBER
           biovolume  In )m3 x 106
           1   35   7  9  11  13  15  17  19
 Oft
                                        5  OCTOBER
                                   biovolume in um^ x 10
                                   1   35   7   9  11  13  15  17  19
13ft1
                                           Oft
                  86Z blue-green
33Z blue-green
                                          12ft.
                 75Z blue-green
                                          22ftJ
87Z blue-green
                                          69Z blue-green
              Abundance and  dominance of  major phytoplankton forms based
              on biovolume data.  Derived from plankton counts made  on
              samples taken  from Sturgeon Lake on  four sampling dates.
              Depths  of samples are approximately  as shown.
                                       fMl

-------
Passenger Lake

     Passenger  Lake had  low  phytoplankton biovolumes  (Figures  4-3b and 4-5)
and  low  blue-green algae biovoluraes  (Table 4-1)  compared  to Island and Stur-
geon Lakes.  Although Passenger Lake had the highest cell count per milliliier
of all four lakes  (Appendix A) the phytoplankton  that accounted for these h:!gh
numbers  (Ochromonas spp; 4500 cells/ml) was a small golden-brown algae  (40 Jim
per organism).    For  the three sampling dates,  two  phytoplankton groups w«-re
dominant,  the  golden-brown  algae  and the  cryptomonads.    Based  on  the  the
findings of  lower biovolumes  in Passenger Lake  than  in Sturgeon Lake, deeper
Secchi disk readings in Passenger  Lake would be  expected.   This  was not cb-
served (Figure  4-3a).   The lower (shallow) Secchi disk readings in Passenger
Lake may have been due to increased light scattering caused by the high number
of  phytoplankton  cells,  by  color  due  to dissolved  organics,  by  suspended
solids brought   into  the  photic  zone  (surface  layer)  from  bottom sediment
resuspension, or  by  sediments carried into  the Lake  from  the  surrounding
watershed.

Rush Lake
     Rush Lake  had  the lowest phytoplankton abundance (Appendix A-2), and had
blue-green biovolumes  similar to Passenger  Lake.   Consequently,  a relatively
small blue-green  biovolume  could dominate the overall phytoplankton communily
(Figure 4-6).   Other  groups that were important in terms of the the biovolun.e
percentages  of Rush  Lake  included cryptonomads  and dinoflagellates.   Cell
sizes  in  the  phytoplankton  samples  were  small  (less  than 1000  jura   per
organism) except  for  the dinoflagellate, Ceratium hirundinella.  Large phyto-
plankton can  have  a significant impact on biomass  concentrations  even at low
densities.  For example,  in the 10 September mid-depth  sample the total cell
density was 748 cells/ml,  and although Ceratium was found at  only 5 cells/ml,,
it represented 38% of the total phytoplankton biomass (Appendix A-l and Figure
4-5).  The low  phytoplankton biovolumes  in Rush Lake  are associated  with th*
highest  (deepest) Secchi disk readings of the four lakes investigated.  Based
on the  survey data of  September 1981  it appears Rush  Lake  had  the  greates1:
water clarity of the four studied lakes (Figure 4-3a).
                                 H-12

-------
                              PASSENGER   LAKE
                                                            10 SEPTEMBER 1981
                                                       biovolume in urn x 10
                                                          35
                                                         9  11  13  15   17 19
                                            Oft
                                           16ft -
                                                       ry^v5\ ^ IX blue-green

                                                                 cryptophyte.
                                                     7Z ocher
                                                            I'Z blue-green

                                                            36Ti cryptophyte
                                                           40Z euglenoid
 Oft
14ff
                  15 SEPTEMBER 1981
            biovolume in
            1   35   7
              >  x  10
              9 U  13 13  17  19
       1 OCTOBER  1981
biovoluae in )im^ x 10"
1   35   7   9  11  13 15  17  19
                                  Oft
        iZ blue-green

     ^39Z cryptophyte

       32% golden brown
8t other
    ^12Z blue-green


       44Z cryptophyce


       36Z golden brown
     27% euglenoid^

      14Z blue-green

       59Z cryptophyte
                                            6ft.
28ft-l
                                                             L4Z blue—green

                                                             42Z cryptophyte
                                                            Z golden brown
                                                     17Z golden brown
                                                              blue-green
                                                             60Z cryptophyte
                                                     L5Z other
                                                            18Z blue-green

                                                                 cryptophyte.
                                 12ftJ /  2SZ golden brown
Figure 4-5.   Abundance  and dominance  of major phytoplankton forms  based
               on  biovolume data.   Derived from plankton counts made on
               samples  taken from Passenger Lake on  three sampling dates.
               Depths of  samples are approximately as  shown.
                                   H-13

-------
                                    RUSH   LAKE  ,
                                                            10 SEPTEMBER  1981

                                                       biovoluroe In tun  x 10
                                                       1   35  7  9  11 13 15  17  19
                                            Oft
                                           16ft
                                           34ft J
                                                    18Z other
                                                             35Z blue-green
                                                          472 dlnoflagellate
                                                    Ulother
                                                          10Z blue-green
                                                              77Z cryptophyte
 Oft
14ft
28ft J
                 15 SEPTEMBER  1981
bio volume in
1   35   7
                        m-' x 10
                         9  11  13 15  17  19
                1 OCTOBER 1981
          biovolume in jim  x 10
             3  5
                      9  11  13 15  17  19
                                 Oft
                  71Z blue-green
         41Z other
      59Z blue-green
6ft
          16Z other
               9Z blue-green
                  75Z cryptophyte
                                 nit
                                               12Z blue-green


                                                49Z dinoflagellate
                                                        39Z other
                                                    22Z other
                                                          ;-/J 50Z blue-green
                                         28Z cryptophyte

                                        .31Z.other
                                                  blue-green


                                                 572 dinoflagellate
Figure 4-6.  Abundance and dominance  of major  phytoplankton  forms based
              on biovolume data.   Derived from  phytoplankton  counts  made on
              samples  taken from Rush  Lake on three sampling  dates.   Depths
              of samples are approximately as shown.
                                    H-14

-------
     Chlorophyll a was  another  parameter measured in the four lakes.   Chloro-

phyll a is a general  indicator of the total phytoplankton biomass but  does not

differentiate between  specific  groups  and  does not always correlate  well  to

water clarity.  Table 4-2 lists  chlorophyll _a concentrations for the 8 Septem-

ber and 15 September sampling dates.  In general, chlorophyll  a_ concentrations

in Island  Lake  samples  were higher than in  Sturgeon,  Rush,  or Passenger Lake

samples.   Higher  chlorophyll  ja  concentrations  may also have  resulted  in the

observed green  appearance of  Island Lake's water compared  to  the  other three

lakes.  This  characteristic has  been  reported  by a number of  lakeside resi-

dents and  may be  enhanced  by the  presence in  Island Lake of  suspended  clay

matter which  scatters  (back-reflects)  light.  The presence of clayey  soils  in

the watershed of Island Lake is  discussed in Section 4.1.2. below.


      Table 4-2. Chlorophyll a_ concentrations Gug/1)  for Island, Sturgeon,
                 Passenger,  and Rush Lakes.
                      SEPTEMBER 8

              Surface  Mid-depth  Bottom
Island
Is-1
Is-2
Is-3
Is-4
Is -5
Is-6
Sturgeon
St-1
St-2
St-3
St-4
Passenger
Rush

37
28
28
32
32
36

10
3
9
8
11
20

34
26
33
24
28
29

11
9
8
8
6
10

28
19
24
8
14
21

10
11
9
7
28
4
       SEPTEMBER  15

Surface  Mid-depth  Bottom
                                                   19
                                                   30
                                                   39
                                                    9
                                                   26
                                                   29
                                                   10
            45

            33
            32
            40
            20
26
12
28
22
 6
16
8
10
8
9
8
7
8
14
9
13
8
8
                                                             16
                       53
                       13
                                   H-15

-------
4.2.  Physician and Veterinarian Interview Report

     A survey of  medical  practitioners was conducted to determine whether any
human, pet  or livestock  health problems had  been diagnosed  in the drainage
areas of  Island,  Sturgeon,  Passenger or Rush  Lakes  since  1979.  Personal and
                                    H-16

-------
telephone interviews were conducted with local medical and veterinary clinics;
state, county, and  local  health and water agencies; and experts.  All respon-
dents were  asked  to consult their records and to poll their staffs on medical
problems that might  be  attributed to water pollution in the study area.  They
were  requested  to   document  cases  involving toxic  effects  attributable  to
blue-green  algae, bacterial and viral infections,  and  outbreaks of cercarial
dermatitus  (swimmers' itch).   An explanation of symptoms exhibited by humans,
pets and livestock after exposure to toxic strains of blue-green algae, and of
swimmers' Itch  was   provided  to all survey participants.  A  phone number was
left  with  each respondant  and  they were encouraged to contact  USEPA if they
wished to provide additional information.

     None of  the  agencies,  clinics, or  experts  polled  had  records of or were
aware of any medical problems associated with water contaminated by blue-green
algae,  or  due to  the presence  of  bacteria  or  virus originating  from human
waste in the study area (Table 4-4).

     The Minnesota  Department of Natural  Resources1  (MDNR)  Water Monitoring
and Control Unit (WMCU)  is responsible for issuing permits for applying copper
sulfate to provide emergency control of cercarial dermatitus (swimmers' itch),
rooted aquatic plants and  phytoplankton growth.   No permits  have  been issued
for copper  sulfate  applications on  Island, Sturgeon, Passenger  or Rush Lakes
during the  past  twenty years  (By telephone, Howard  Krosch,  Supervisor WMCU,
MDNR 10 November 1981).

     Instances of animal  illness or death attributed to  blue-green algae are
rare in the northern portion of the  state of Minnesota.   Occasional toxic blue
green  algae blooms  have  been  recorded  In  southern  and western  Minnesota,
typically reappearing  in  two  to three  year  intervals  (By telephone,  Howard
Krosch, WMCU, MDNR  18  November 1981).  There have been no documented domestic
animal deaths attributable  to  blue-green algae in northern Minnesota near the
Moose  Lake  area  (Personal  communication,  Dr.   Clarence  Stowe,  Large Animal
Clinic - University  of Minnesota, 9  November 1981).

     Conversely,   cercarial  dermatitus   (swimmers'  itch)  is  reported  to  be
common in   lakes  throughout  Minnesota (By  telephone,  Gene Jordan,  Minnesota
State Department of  Health, 5  November  1981).   However,  none of the state or
                                      H-17

-------
 (D
 s
 0)
•H

 Sw
 
 n>
 a)
 O
 4J
 d)  M
 tB  0)
     o
    Z
  a
ki 3

& *fi

1 _C

"m «
o -^

M
11
_ a
o
z
1
1
1
1
*




• »
.e

a
5

eg £
WE "5
e * -c
V kl kl
EC «J
kl Cl B
S. o
v x
D DC B —
C -* V
C -. — Q
4J O O *C
g-i a. u
E 0 w
41 S v x
C -0 =
c — c
S ic s a

i 1
1 1
1 1
i 1
o e
z z






e
i
- «i
kl L, tl
e o e
0. B -H
V -i W

>> «l

0. = W
e. w ti
S -D
05 .--

ki be.
u B e -=
«" •* — U
« -< i> in
& -a e
u a b u
is st
.os u a
£r 26
c
z
I
i
1
i
£
«
3
3
a

—
£

0
JSJ
t»J lJ
o o
B

e >
U kl
6 J;
| 1

a e"
S
9 -0
O B
B -S
01
i |
X \3
C
Z
1
t
1
1
D
Z
B

gte
o

u o
< e
i
2 3

U 0 -<

e "S o
O -H ->
-i > e
j» e »

e » x
— I B
as >

«l Vt &. X
e v b
1 I M* 3
                                                                   H-18

-------
I    *j
I
o
z
,
1
I
1
•






Jj

9
Bf


r-f
1
5
*s
*B
Hlnneaotn Roar
St. Paul
Ur. Keller
Dr. Flint
o
X
,
1
1
1
•







B
V
U

>
b
V
B 03
O -* ttf
00 »
c; u D
5 .5 **
z ^ >
University of I
Large An Inn 1. C
St. Fnul
DC. Clarence M
Q

1
1
1
1
£









o

e

5
S 5
b B

« 10
V
* II ?
J< X Jt
e a c
.J -3 B
b
01 0) ki
IB B
CO
CO b
XX 0
o
z
a
1
1
1
m
a

^j
^
^


&

•^
u

•w
«^ b
c e
CO O
V
W b
ft* •— <
V B

•S £
C —
*•* O
3 -ff
|| |
B B e
o e b
e
z
1
1
1
1
'
u
^
b
*l
to

e
B
e




o
e
I
b
e
c. b
Pine County De
Pine City
Janet Scliumnke
o
z
1
1
1
1
£








^J
p^
B
U

•M
O
a B
O b
0 S

Carl ton County
Cloquet
RncliPl Puite,
e
z
1
i
t
*
'









v

•4

0
«
s
c
5

Carl ton County
Cloquet
nruee Henson
e

1
1
1
I
I














0
c
3

•I
*•£•
— i ^ u
U U 0
V V
c e •
•H •* b
cw a. a
c o

1 1
1 1
1 i
1 1
..








•|j
D

C

7!
e
v o
w CJ>
c

t> CO
v4 ~*
S G"
b •>
££ II
.* « O
0 t» »•.
S e b .
— -< e b
= = x a
_o

1
1
1
1
'

b
e

u
ti
b

e


o
e
B
b
s
B
C
O M
e •
it e
— o
Hora Hedlcal C
Hora
Lorrnine Cnrls
c c
X Z
i I
1 i
t 1
1 1
»









t)

£

5 g
£ g c
— i KB
1 ||

1. |5
« EC
>, J >, e
a f t>
» « es w;
2 O • .
BO b w
U X CO
                                             H-19

-------
county agencies surveyed had records of any outbreaks of swimmers' Itch In Is-
land,  Sturgeon,  Rush or  Passenger Lakes  (Table 4-4).   Most  patients treated
for  swimmers'  Itch  in  the  Moose  Lake  area  probably  contracted  it  while
swimming  In  Moose  Head  lake  (By  telephone,  Doctors Raymond  Chrlstensen and
Kenneth  Etterman,  12  November  1981).   Local  citizens have   not  reported
occurences  of  swimmers'   itch  on  Sturgeon, Rush  or  Passenger  Lakes.   One
instance  of  swimmers' itch occurring  on  4  July 1981 was reported  by a home
owner  on  the  south  shore  of  Island Lake  (Personal   communication,  Harold
Westholm, November  1981).  No reoccurences have been reported.
                                    H-20

-------
       T    S
I

A


8

jl
C



|
        '"  I
            >.

            5



        i

        :    S
            7


            X
       M


       O
T
•o
            I

            i
•* O * »ff 1
** co 1
-» O H> JM I
ce
•4
CK eh
coo «M in 1
WONn |
4*4
IS
So w «•• ^
m
*M O CO O* I
£0~| J
*fl
•G O * O^ *H
-H CO N 1
S = *§ 1
CD
€*»
— 00 —
N
•-green algae, blo-volune
iflagellate, bio-volume
>r phytoplankton, bio-volume
ital blovolume) x 10* /ml.
L dink depth (meters)
•2-SSS-g
MM M a M
xO — < «M O 1
t- O O <*i «0 1
00 — l-> 1
S ° — 2o N
iri o to CK  W
t?iOO *S1 Ol
o o o o co I
c^ ^ ^ 1
PI
«
ge-«2«
CS'SSI
JES^S 1
0
f^ -« —t -<
^'STURGEON LAKE
.•-green algae, bio-volume
itomond, blo-volune
ton, blo-volune
>r phytoplankton, bio-volune
>tal blovolume) x 10* /ml.
L dlflk depth (meters)
2. tif il-g
J3 M M M M a.»
(S N *^ O Ox O I
-< IM 1A •«> j
O BO O O »M M 1
ITI (S «SI M 1
M
r*
fM ^ Ox O CB IM 1*1
OX IA O «A «^ O I
 o-» o >»  1*1 1
«-• Ki **« O 1
tn o ^ o co o i
g
cr> in o o >*> o *n
! 1 1 1 1 f !
I ! i i 1 ! t

I ! i ! ! 1 1
|.
f * •* r;*o "»
160 A ~* *•
O 3 > J V
S 0 0 1 « " t
> ~, — 0 ••. B
• V J> o •• i >-
«» 0 > J< fi
« »5 • 1 B 3 JB
M A * 0 « — -
S "3 -SS-iS S
5 e-S= .25"
* e o -o xx> -K
z «y 0 w— .c •
Sk. E n o Q*^ -^
M 0 -, C B TJ
j: s xc »-c ~ c.
_ i. _, a ^ ^- o
"B <<
2S« °2K 1
SSB-SI
 O O •- --I 1
— t n ^ r* 1
os -^ o o o «o I
m
Ov
CM ^CT CM ^» CO
i i i i : i i
! ! ! 1 1 1 1

1 1 ! 1 1 1 1
'PASSENGER LAKE
•-green algae, bio-volume
itononad, bio-volume
len brown algae, bio-volume
lenoid, bio-volume
>r phytoplankton, bio-volume
itai blovolume) x 10* /ml.
L disk depth (meters)
- mfc.'o3*'^'O

%o -4 >o *n r** o*
in -M •->• -^ h*
522S-SI
m
c
•TV -* -^ *-« PV
i I 1 1 1 1 1


1 t ! ! M !



! 1 ! ! ! ! I


! 1 ! 1 ! ! !
! ! j I 1 ! {

Ml!!!!




i i : i : i i


! ! ! ! 1 i !


M : i : i i


, s J.
E t-> O —
a o > e
"o f oJ^<—
p. 0 tl ft O »
1 -^ B ^ -> k.
O J3 3 W
J9 • O C «jl
U « > 0 — % B
• e * i ^ v —
V 3 «^ ^ 1



«|C * Q. > K
0 5 -o o o 'o

4i .fl 1* C >vS -^
ti & O ^ *
*- » e o.— i 
• .1
s5«
•^ V *" •
*J > tl
aj ^ na A:
^ * -2 u
§ -«!
S^5
•o o —
B M E «
J£S j.
^ «l
t. ^ 4
« tC
— M


^l-g
> *•" •

Jill
*o *J
> A
1 • n

2 « «


•22 = ^
•O W O If
fc 2£
O *C| <•
At C ** ^D

                                                  H-21

-------
Table A-3.
Phytoplankton Measurements
CTANOPHTTA
   Anabaena
                tp
CRY?TOPHYTA
              acuta.
CRYSOPHYTA
             ip
   Octviomaruu
   Utogttna. ip
PYRKHOFHTA
EUCtEHOPHYTA
BACILLARIOPHY7A
   Navxcula
CHLOROPHTTA
                                45,000
                                 9,000a
                                 1,000
                                 2,800
                                   300a
                                    10a
                                    70
                                  1000b
                                  1100
                                   soo
                                   500*
                                   550*
                                    40
                                   450
                                                 75,000
                                  14003

                                  3200*
                                  1800
                                  3000*
                                  2000*
                                   690*
                                  2000b
                                   840a
                                                    250"
                                                    300a
                                                    620a
                                                    150a
                                                    650*
                                                    5003
 university of Minnesota aeasureaents/unpublished
bWetz*l. p 319, 1975
                       H-22

-------
               Appendix  I
Methodology  for Population Projections
                                                                        en
                                                                        c
                                                                        o
                                                                        •H
                                                                        4-1
                                                                        CJ
                                                                        01
                                                                        •i— 1
                                                                        O
                                                                        t-l

                                                                        •3
                                                                        a,
                                                                        t-l
                                                                        o
                                                                        60
                                                                        O
                                                                        rH
                                                                        O
                                                                        •O
                                                                        O
                                                                        w
                                                                        PM
                                                                        PLI

-------

-------
 Methodology for  Population Projections

                                       The available census data on popula-
tion  within the Townships  is for  year-round  residents  only.  Thus, esti-
mates  of  the  peak  population (seasonal  plus year-round) are  derived by
assigning an average household size for seasonal dwellings to the number of
seasonal  dwellings  and combining  the result  with  the projected number of
year-round residents. Because of the large proportion of seasonal dwellings
in Windemere Township and the documented historic variability in the growth
of  the  year-round  population versus  the  growth  in  the total  number of
housing  units,   a  population  based projection  would have  to  incorporate
subjective  assumptions  concerning  the  change  in the  ratio of  seasonal to
permanent residents over time.

     Accurate  population  projections  are  essential  for designing  cost
effective wastewater treatment facilities.  Thus, the peak population is of
greatest  importance because  the  wastewater  treatment facilities  must be
designed  to accommodate  the  maximum anticipated  wastewater  flow  for  the
                               1-1

-------
 life of the facilities.   A housing unit  based  projection  that  is developed
 from historic  data yields  a total  housing unit  projection that can be used
 to  estimate  the  total  population,  i.e.,  year-round as  well  as seasonal
 residents.

      To determine  the population  of an area  when the number of housing
 units is known  requires  two  assumptions:   the  average  household size and
 the ratio of seasonal to  permanent residents at the end  of  the projection
 period.   In this report,  a  slight  decrease  in the household size of year-
 round  residents  was  forecasted because of  the  documented  trend  toward
 smaller households and the high median  age  in  the  project area which un-
 derscores  the  attraction  of the local region  as  a retirement area.  Site
 specific  information  on the average  household size of seasonal dwelling is
 not readily available.   In one study conducted by  the  University of Wis-
 consin  Recreation Resources  Center,  an  average household size of 3.0 was
 found for seasonal dwellings in a  similar  rural  lake  area  (University of
 Wisconsin  Recreation  Resources  Center   1979).  Accordingly,  the  seasonal
 population  projections assume a household size  of  3.0  during the planning
 period.   A  slight  decrease  in the  proportion of  seasonal dwellings  to
 year-round dwellings also  is assumed  based on the trend apparent during the
 1970s when the growth  rate  for permanent  dwellings exceeded the growth rate
 for seasonal dwellings.   In spite  of these household size assumptions, and
 their potential  for  error,  the total projected population, as derived from
 the housing unit projections, should  not  result in significant error if the
 total housing unit growth rates occur as  projected.  For example, if in the
 year 2000  the  actual  number of housing units equals  the  total number pro-
 jected,  but  there are  fewer permanent residents  than  expected,  the  pop-
 ulation on an annual basis should not vary significantly because the summer
 season  population  will be  larger   than estimated while  the average  winter
 season population is less.

 Projections for Windemere Township

     The housing  unit projections  were  made by the  "growth rate" method,
based on an extrapolation  of  past  growth  rates.   This  method was  used
because  it  more closely  models actual changes  than any  of  the  other me-
                               1-2

-------
 thods.   The "share"  method was  not used  because  it is  not suitable  for
 jurisdictions  in counties  where  there  is  a fluctuation in  subcounty  pop-
 ulation  growth rates,  i.e.,  if  some  places are growing while others  are
 losing.   The "ratio-trend" method  was  not used  because of  the historical
 variability  in the ratio between Windemere Township's population and  Pine
 County's  population.   Additionally,  the use  of  the  "growth rate" method
 provides  for several different projections based on different assumptions
 concerning  future growth.  The different projections  can then be comapred
 with  other  factors such  as  the amount of buildable  land, land values,
 public  services availability, etc.  in  determing the  most reasonable pro-
 jection for  the facility  planning or "service area".

     The growth rate method is the only  method by which the increase in  the
 number  of housing  units  can be  projected  directly.   One problem with  the
 growth  rate  method,  though,  is  that  the projection  results from exponen-
 tially  applying  the  average annual growth  rate  to  the  previous  year's
 population.   If the study  area  experienced unusually rapid  growth  in  the
 last decade,  the  exponential  application of the average annual growth rate
 can lead  to  an unrealistically high projection.  Housing unit projections
 were  initially developed  for Windemere Township based  on  four  different
assumptions concerning future growth (Table 1-1 ;  Figure 1-1  ).

 Table  1-1.   Housing Unit Projections,  Windemere Township, 1980 to 2000.
           Assumptions                         1980     1990      _2000_
1. Straight average:  growth rate for the
   projection period remains constant at
   the 1960 to 1980 average               -    919      1,565     2,673
2. Trend rate:  growth rate for the pro-
   jection period changes at the same
   rate as the 1960 to 1980 change             919      1,349     1,883
3. Rate slowdown:  growth rate from 1980 to
   1990 equals the 1970 to 1980 growth rate
   and rate from 1990 to 2000 is onehalf
   1970 to 1980 growth rate                    919      1,286     1,614
4. Rate change slowdown:   growth rate from
   1980 to 1990 equals one-half the 1960
   to 1980 growth rate and rate from 1990
   to 2000 equals one-half the 1960 to 1980
   growth rate.	919	1.201     1.375
                                 1-3

-------
      The  exponential  aspect of the growth rate method is apparent when the
 projections are depicted on a graph (Figure  1-1 ).  Assumptions 1 and 2 for
 Windemere Township  result  in growth taking  place  at  a rate exceeding that
 experienced  in the Township  in the  last  decase.  Assumption  3,  although
 termed  a "rate  slowdown,"  essentially  is  a   straight-line  projection.
 Assumption 4  for  Winderaere Township was the projection that was determined
 to  be most realistic. This projection assumes that growth will continue in
 the  Township  from 1980 to 1990 at a rate similar to the growth experienced
 from 1960 to 1980.  After  1990, the projection assumes that the growth rate
 will decrease as the area approaches "saturation."

      Rural recreational  areas such as the  Island  Lake and  Sturgeon Lake
 portions  of Windemere Township are attractive to development because of the
 amenities associated  with lakefront  property.   As the  first  tier of lake
 contiguous lots becomes fully developed, it is not unusual for growth rates
 to  decrease because property in the second  tier  (backlots)  or on outlying
 lots ie  in less demand.  There are a total of 151 homes on the platted land
 areas  adjacent to  Island  Lake  at present,  and  the  first tier  of these
 lake shore  lots can  accommodate  an estimated 185  to 200  homes.   Given this
 situation, is  expected that  most  of  the  available lakefront  lots  around
 Island Lake will be developed in the next 10 years while in the second half
 of  the  planning period  (1990 to 2000)  total growth  around  the  Lake will
 level off because developable  lots  will only  be available  in the  second
 tier  (backlots).   Assumption 4 appears to represent the possibility  that
 growth will continue,  but not at the extremely high rates that were experi-
 enced in  the 1960s and 1970s.

     The  housing unit  projection  for  Windemere Township was dissaggregated
 so that the number of  housing units within the subareas could be  projected
 (Table 1-2 ).  The  housing unit projection for the subareas  within  Winde-
mere  Township  assumes that after  1990,  more  of  the  Township  growth will
 take  place in ED 503 as  the  supply  of lakefront  lots around  Island  and
 Sturgeon  Lakes becomes depleted.   The housing unit projections  indicate  a
year  2000 total  of 214  and 282 housing units around Island  and  Sturgeon
Lakes, respectively,  and  1,375 housing units  within Windemere  Township.
The  housing unit  projections were further disaggregated according to sea-
sonal and permanent units based  on survey  information  obtained from  the
                                1-4

-------
  2500-
  2000-
2 1500-
o
z
m
o
  1000-
   500 -
              I
            1960
                                                       • straight average
1970
  I
1980
                                                        trend rate
                                                        rate slowdown
                                                        rate change slowdown
1990
  I
2000
  Figure i-i.Windemere Township housing units actual growth 1960 to 1980
           and projected growth  1980 to 2000
                                 1-5

-------
      MLWSD  and the  I960 census  (Table  1-3).    The  seasonal  to permanent pro-

      jections  also assume  that  permanent residences  will form a  greater pro-

      portion of the  total after 1990 as a result of increased numbers of retired

      residents  living  in the area on a  year-round  basis.   Information from the

      1970 and  1980 census1  support this assumption.  Between 1970 and 1980, the

      number  of year-round  residents  in  Windemere  Township increased  by 79.1%

      while  the number  of housing units  increased  by  56.6% (US Bureau  of the

      Census  1981).  This  is an  indication that some  housing units  that were

      previously used on a seasonal basis are now being occupied on a year-round

      basis.


      Table  1-2.   Housing unit projections within Windemere Township, 1980 to
                    2000  (US Bureau of the Census 1982).
        Location

      ED  504

        Island Lake
        Sturgeon Lake
        Outlying Areas

      ED  503

        Windemere Township
1980

 397

 151
 197
  49

 522

 919
1990

  519

  197
  260
   62

  682

1,201
2000

  564

  214
  282
   68

  811

1,375
      Note:  The disaggregated projections assume that growth from 1980 to 1990
      is spread evenly between the subareas.  Because the amount of developable
      land in ED 504 is limited, the year 2000 projection assumes that the per-
      centage of the population is ED 504 decreases from 43% to 41% by the year
      2000.
Table 1-3.   Seasonal and permanent housing unit projection within Windemere
             Township, 1980 to 2000.
                             1980
1990
              2000
Location
ED 504
Island Lake
Sturgeon Lake
Outlying Areas
ED 503
Windemere Township
Permanent
138
64
42
32
269
407
Seasonal
259
87
155
17
253
512
                                               180

                                                84
                                                55
                                                41

                                               351

                                               531
       339

       113
       205
        21

       331

       670
         223

         103
          72
          48

         446

         670
        Seasonal

          341

          111
          210
           20

          365

          705
Note:  The split between seasonal and permanent housing units was determined from MLWSD
       records and 1980 census data.  The 1990 projections assume the same proportion of
       seasonal to permanent residents as in 1980.  The year 2000 projection assume an
       increasing proportion of permanent residents as a result of increased demand by
       retired people for year-round residences and a lower demand for seasonal resi-
       dences.
                                     1-6

-------
           Appendix J
Water Quality Tables and  Figures
                                                                  CO
                                                                  

                                                                  a
                                                                  o
                                                                  w

                                                                  1

-------

-------
Table J-l.  Sampling program and  schedule  for  surface  water sampling in
            Island, Little Island, Sturgeon, Rush, and Passenger Lakes,
            Pine County MN.
Lake
Island
Little Island

Sturgeon
Rush
Passenger
Sampling Dates

26 August    1981
09 September 1981
14 September 1981
30 September 1981
03 February  1982
27 August    1981
09 September 1981
15 September 1981
05 September 1981
04 February  1982

10 September 1981
15 September 1981
01 October   1981

10 September 1981
15 September 1981
01 October   1981
   Parameters

d/t;  Sd;  b
d/t;  Sd;  b;  chl
d/t;  Sd;  b;  chl
d/t;  Sd;  b
d/t;  P^
03 February  1982   d/t;  P
d/t;  Sd;  b
d/t;  Sd;  b;  chl
d/t;  Sd;  b;  chl
d/t;  Sd;  b
d/t;  Pt

d/t;  Sd;  b,  chl
d/t;  Sd;  b;  chl
d/t;  Sd;  b

d/t;  Sd;  b;  chl
d/t;  Sd;  b;  chl
d/t;  Sd;  b
   Number of
Stations Sampled

        6
        6
        6
        6
        2
        4
        4
        4
        4
        2

        1
        1
        1

        1
        1
        1
 Parameter Key:

d/t  =  Dissolved oxygen and temperature at 2-foot depth
        intervals from the surface

Sd   =  Secchi disk depth at each station

 b   =  biovolume of phytoplankton at surface, mid-depth,
        and above the lake bottom

chl  *  chlorophyll zi (corrected for breakdown products) at
        surface, mid-depth, and above the lake bottom

P    «  Total phosphorus at surface (under the ice) and above the
        lake bottom
                                J-l

-------
     Field investigations were conducted in the project area in  1981 during

the  periods  of  24-27  August;  7-15  September;   28-30  September;  and 1-5
October.  During these  sampling  periods,  prevailing wind  directions were

easterly; westerly changing  to  southerly and then back to northwesterly;
easterly; and widely variable, respectively.
Table Jrr2-.
Peak daily air temperature and prevailing sky cover as re-
corded at the Duluth International Airport during the four
sampling visits made to the Moose Lake Area  (NOAA 1981).
    Date
          Peak Daytime
         Temperature, °F
Prevailing Daytime
    Sky Cover
24 August
25 August
26 August
27 August
07 September
08 September
09 September
10 September
11 September
12 September
13 September
14 September
15 September
28 September
29 September
30 September
01 October
02 October
03 October
04 October
05 October
65
63
68
59
65
67
81
77
77
77
78
65
55
46
44
42
40
48
50
47
48
Overcast
Overcast
Overcast
Overcast
Overcast
Clear
Clear
Overcast
Clear
Clear
Clear
Scattered Clouds
Overcast
Overcast
Overcast
Overcast
Overcast
Clear
Overcast
Overcast
Overcast
                               J-2

-------
                                                             o§
      a
      9
      CO

      o s
      CO   *
                          §
            I iQOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
   Jill   1   I   I    I
     o     o     o     o
     ^     N     »     *
(0
o
•o

(0
O
CO
   in
O> ~~
                        o
                        o
                          1   1    1
                          o     o
                          «l     »
 I
O
                                                    CO
                                                    CO
                                                    CD
                                                     o
                                                    CO
                                                    *^

                                                     o
                                                    JC
                                                     CO
                                       0)
                                            CO

                                            O s
                                            CO   u» -
                                                    oooooooooooo
                                                                    I   I   I   1    I
                                                       I   I   i    i   r
                                                                                    0)
                                                                                          CO
                                                                                         H
                                                                                          co
                                                                                          (3
                                                                                         •rl
                                                                                          co
                                                                                          CO
                                                                                          3
                                                                                          O
                                                                                         *o
                                                                            JH

                                                                            O
                                                                            >
                                                                            Si  Q)
                                                                            Lj  J>
                                                                               &
                                                                            H  3
                                                                            o  co
                                                                            14-1
                                                                               •o
                                                                            CO  
                                                                            ^  iH
                                                                             o  -1
                                                                             M  00
                                                                                          B S
                                                                                          3 O
                                                                                          JJ VJ
                                                                                          Cfl «*-!
                                                                                          M
                                                                                          
-------
          o
          K
          O)
           Q.
           o
                                                                                                                                        Jl
                                                                                                                                        3
                                                                4J
                                                            i-l  C
                                                             CO  tl)

                                                                4J
                                                             0)  U
                                                            i-H  CO
                                                             •M  O.
                                                                                                                                            fl
                                                                                                                                         W  4J
                                                                                                                                         O  O
                                                                                                                                        M-l  CO
                                                                                                                                            QJ
                                                                                                                                        •O  C
                                                                                                                                         a  c
                                                                                                         UT
                                                                                                                                        T3 M-l
                                                                                                                                         G  O
 o
je
 CO

•o

 e
"S
          10
          0)
          CM
 o
 0
^

0»
h.
0»
»•

 CD
 a
                                                             O
                                                             m -o
                                                                 a)
                                                             CO J3
                                                             CU  CO
                                                             r-< -H
                                                             i-l .-H
                                                             IH ,0
                                                             O  3
                                                             n  ft
                                                             ft  S
                                                                                                                                         M  6
                                                                                                                                         a  o

                                                                                                                                         efl M-I

                                                                                                                                         0)  0)
                                                                                                                                         ft  M
                                                                                                                                         B  O)
                                                                                                                                         0)
                                                                                                                                         4-1  A
                                                                                                                                             td
                                                                                                                                            o
                                                                                                                                         a
        CO
        cu
        o


 X   •>  O
 O  >i  M

 «i ^
^3-^
 O      »-i
 03  0)  3
 M  C  JJ
•rl  i-l  
-------
         o
         O
             a _ j >ooooooooeoooooo
                     \    ii    i   i    i   i
                        o      o      o
                        ^      CM      CO
                                                      CO
                                                      CJ
                                                      c
         a.
         o
         CO

         10   =
           2
o
.*
CO
o
0)
o>
CO
    I   1

o      2
 lit)
o       o
M       A
                 dOOOOOOOOO
         CO
                        I
                        o
i   r
O
               o
               o
        O)
                 K)OOOOOOOOOOO
                     i   i   i   i   r
                        S      8

                       •« uj mdea
                                     c
                                     o
                                     Q)
                       3
                       C/l

                       1-1
                       o
                       CO

                       3
                       •H
                       4-i
                       O
                       H
                       a

                       a)
                       »-i

                       4J
                       rt
                       M
                       01
                                     a)  co
                                     ^J  ^.^

                                        01
                                     T3  >


                                     §  3
                                        CO


                                     CD TJ
                                     MrH

                                     ^ Q)


                                     O *H


                                     T3 rH
                                     01 00
                                                      CD  S
                                                      CO  O
                                                      •r<  t-l
                                                      Q t<-i
                                                      00
                                 J-5

-------
       s«*

o
«
_l
c
o
e
a
i_
3
5

SJS-
CO
o ss.

^
a
o
CO 0.-,
S "" *
M
CM



g
i





*""* 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1
o o o o o
*• Ol w ^
                                                                                                                                          
                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                       a  q
                                                                                                                                       4-> tH
                                                                                                                                       tfl -H
                                                                                                                                       )-i IM

                                                                                                                                       (0
                                                                                                                                       D- T3
                                                                                                                                       6  Q)
                                                                                                                                       0> £1
                                                                                                                                       •u  tn
                                                                                                                                          •H
                                                                                                                                       •O H


                                                                                                                                       3-9
                                                                                                                                           D.
CO
C9
 O>


<
                  1     1     1
 1
g
 1
§
n
 e
                                                                                                      a;    !i
                                                                                                      r-H  dj

                                                                                                      ID  n)
                                                                                                      cfl  u
                                                                                                      •H  0
                                                             J-6

-------
                                                                                                              CO
                        1    I    F    I
                            88
                                                                          o
                                                                          o
                                                                       00000-6
                                                                                      I
                                                                                     O
                                                                                                              M
                                                                                                              O
                                                                                                             "O

                                                                                                              9
 CO
hJ   •
    co
 M  >>
 0)  CU
 00 >
 C  M
 
                                                                                                             co ao
                                                                                                             at 
                                                                                                             T3 C
                                                                                                             CU -H
                                                                                                             > CM
                                                                                                             iH
                                                                                                             O  «
                                                                                                             CO 
-------

-------
            Appendix  K
Letter  to Citizen's  Advisory Committee
                                                                   
-------

-------
             RECEIVEDFEB021982
Rte. 2, Box 140-B
Island Lake
Sturgeon Lake. lln. 55783
   372-3169
                                           Jan.  25,  1982
Mr. Gregory Dean Evenson
Chairman
Citizens Advisory Committee
Moose Lake, Winn.  55767
Dear Mr. Evenson:

You requested Ideas from the Citizens Advisory Committee on Jan.  7,
1982 at the meeting which concerned the Draft Report ^n Algae.
            Here are my Ideas.

First of all and most Importantly I am open minded to what this
study Is Investigating concerning the 4 lakes of Windea-.ere Town-
ship.  It appears that this study must be enacted to satisfy fede-
ral and state regulations.  From what I have gathered by talking  to
PCA and WAPORA people, from public meetings, and personally obser-
ving Finney doing field work I  feel that WAH^RA Is doing a profess-
ional job.  However, this work  needs to be monitored by Windejcere
Citizens.

The jewels of Wlndemere Township our lakes must have truly been
that as observed by the native  American Indians, early explorers
and the early hardy Scandinavian pioneers.

The logging, fires, and land clearing was especially hard on Island
Lake due to the heavy clay soil comprising the bulk of the water-
shed.  The pioneers knew that the land around Island Lake would be
many times more productive than the relatively sterile jack pine
outwasb plain around Rush Lake.

The heavy farmland clearing around Island Lake must have contri-
buted greatly to it's eutrophicatlon.  As a casual observer around
Island Lake since the late 1940's I have noticed contributing factors
to eutrophication.

In the HEi Section 8, T. 4 5 R«  18 was located a barnyard directly
on the lakeshore with pig pens  going right out into the lake. ,  At
loast two other farms in that Quarter Section had barnyards that
drained into the lake.  In Section 4 at the end of the present
Twilight Lane Holsteins contently grazed along the lake following
a fence that went out into the  lake to take a drink.  There were
other barnyards in Sec. 3 and 4 that contributed runoff, as in  Sec-
tions 9 and 10.
                            K-l

-------
     Mr.  Even son
    Island  Lake has walleyes  that  grow at 2  times the State average.
    As being  a young fishing  partner of Ted  Anderson who learned
    techniques and spots from him. and in turn showed him spntSjI can
    attest  to having caught almost numerous  quantities of these tasty
    fish  from 6 to 11 pounds.   It  Is my unscientific opinion that the
    land  clearing and barnyard  nutrient enrichment has been a factor
    in good fish growth.

    Fowever,  land use around  Island Lake is  changing or has changed to
    chiefly residential- recreational use.

    I  had occasslon to observe  when the bulk of the initial cabin and
    homesite  developoent took place along the lake she re.  In Sections
    3,4 & 9 some filling took place on swampy shoreline.  In Sections
    3  and 9 seme steep clay banks  were graded with heavy equipment in
    the Fall.  The following  Spring beavy rainfall washed large aaounts
    of clay into the lake.  For a  time the water along that shore was
    of a  reddish-brown opague color due to clay particles suspended in
    the water.  Each additional developed lot contributes some erosion
    therefore affecting nutrient balance in  the lake*

    Of course, inadequate septic tank drainfield systens have added
    their share of pollutants.

    I  recall  Island Lake as always having "dog days'* or algae bloom
    in August or Sept. in the late 19*0' s and the 1950' s when kids
    such as nyself were told  not to go swimming.  However, It seems
    that the  blooms are more  severe now and  I don't let my kids go
    swimming  in "(Jog days11.

    A  weed  came into the lake in the 19J>0' s  which we called hair weed,
    which I believe is milfoil.  A truly noxious type of weed as it
    choked  cut less noxious valuable shoreline and submerged weed beds.
    In la-te Summer large matts  of floating "hair weed" would make
    rowing  a  boat difficult in  shallow areas.  The weed is still here
    but seems to get chopped  up by the large number of power boats on
    the lake  today.

    In summary I think that this Draft Report ^n Algae is helping to
    bring scientific biological investigation to the factors and core
    problems  affecting the eutrophication of these 4 lakes in Pine
    County,   Let us hope that the  remainder of the studies will allow
    us to become better informed citizens to study the alternatives
    available for the protection of our "jewels" for our children.

                                               Sincerely,
C
-------
            Appendix L
Paleollmnological  Investigation
                                                                    c
                                                                    o
                                                                    •H
                                                                    i-i
                                                                    «
                                                                    00
                                                                    •H
                                                                    4J
                                                                    cn
                                                                    a)

                                                                    c
                                                                    CO
                                                                    O
                                                                    •H
                                                                    00
                                                                    o
                                                                    iH
                                                                    O

                                                                    e
                                                                    o
                                                                    0)
                                                                    x
                                                                    w

-------

-------
              ONSITE WASTE TREATMENT AND LAKE EUTROPHICATION:
                    ANALYSIS WITH DATED LAKE SEDIMENTS
                     112               2
        S. R. MeComas , J. C. Laumer  , P. Garrison , and D. Knauer ,
       , Inc., Suite 490, 35 E. Wacker Drive, Chicago, IL  60601
 Lake  Management  Consultants,  Inc.,  166 Dixon  Street,  Madison,  WI  53704
ABSTRACT:

     Three seepage  lakes  in north central Minnesota were studied to evalu-
ate  the  relative impacts  of onsite waste treatment  systems  and other nu-
trient sources  on lake trophic status.   Island  and  Sturgeon Lakes, having
extensive  shoreline development  served  exclusively  with  onsite systems,
were  compared  to a third  lake  (Little  Island  Lake) having  no shoreline
residential development.  Interpretation of sediment core results indicated
all three lakes had phosphorus concentrations, chlorophyll degradation pro-
ducts, and diatom communities indicative of predominant land uses in their
watersheds.   The  present  trophic  condition for Island Lake was established
after the turn of the century (with conversion of forest lands to agricult-
ural use)  and prior to development of  a large lakeshore community.  Stur-
geon Lake has a relatively small watershed and phosphorus concentrations in
the  sediment  core appear to  have been influenced in the last  40 years by
one farmstead located on the lakeshore.  Little Island Lake had the highest
chlorophyll  and  phosphorus  sediment  concentrations  of  the  three  lakes.
Little Island Lake  is  shallow,  and macrophytes represent a chlorophyll and
phosphorus  sink.    Relatively  minor  changes   in  all  three  lakes'  trophic
status have occurred since the 1950s, the period when lakeshore development
began to increase exponentially around Island  and Sturgeon Lakes.
                             L-l

-------
INTRODUCTION

     An  increase  in  lake  eutrophication  by  wastewater  discharge  from
municipal sewage treatment plants has been veil documented  (Edmundson 1970,
Megard  1972,  Larson  1975).   Few studies have  shown the effects of nutrient
inputs  associated with  onsite waste  treatment  systems  on lake eutrophi-
cation.  Typically,  the  first  type of  wastewater treatment serving lake-
shore residences  is  onsite.   Lakeshore homeowners may correlate increasing
lake eutrophication  symptoms with additional  development  of lakeshore lots
and  the  increase  in  onsite  systems.   They  assume the  input  of partially
treated  wasteflows from onsite  systems is  the primary  factor  for water
quality degradation.   But,  from the literature, the  actual role of onsite
systems in lake eutrophication is unclear.

     The literature  describes a  range of possibilities  in regard  to the
importance of nutrient  inputs  from onsite  systems.   Water chemistry data
and  nutrient  budget  calculations  for  a number  of lake  watersheds in the
northern United  States  indicate  septic tank/drainfield systems contribute
generally less  than 30% of  the  total  phosphorus or  nitrogen  load to the
aquatic system  (Kerfoot  and  Skinner 1980, Jones and Lee  1977, USEPA 1979a,
1979b, 1979c, 1979d,  1979e,  1981, 1982).  Typically, agricultural land use
in the watershed  dominates  the phosphorus load  (Dillon and Klrchner 1974).
However, estimates using total phosphorus may overestimate the importance
of nutrients  in  runoff since not all  of the total phosphorus component is
biologically  available  (Logan  et  al.  1982).   Phosphorus associated with
septic tank  effluent  entering  the groundwater  flow  field is  typically in
the  dissolved form  and  therefore,  biologically  available.   Some studies
indicate that the potential  for relatively high dissolved  phosphorus inputs
from onsite systems  (Brandes 1974, Viraraghaven and  Warnock 1976) and Lee
(1976) suggests groundwater  inputs could be especially significant to lake
water quality when water influx is dominated by seepage.

     In  this study,   we examined  stratigraphic  characteristics  of  lake
sediment to determine changes in lake trophic  indicators  (including organic
matter, chlorophyll,  diatoms,  and phosphorus) covering a time  period from
the  settlement of  the  watersheds by non-Indians to  the present.  Sediment
                                 1-2

-------
cores were  taken from three seepage lakes in north central Minnesota.  Two
of  the  lakes,  Island and  Sturgeon,  have  residences with  onsite systems
around them,  and currently  are documented to  have blue-green algae as the
dominant  late summer phytoplankter  (USEPA 1982).   The  third lake (Little
Island),  is contiguous  to  Island Lake  and  has had  only  one house in its
watershed  in  the last  100  years  and  no visual  signs of blue-green algae
blooms. Other than  onsite systems, no wastewater  treatment  flows or other
point sources enter these lakes.  It is assumed the major pathways for nu-
trient introduction into these lakes have always  been groundwater, atmos-
pheric deposition,  runoff in  the direct drainage area, and  internal nu-
trient recycling.   Hydrologic  and watershed parameters  for all three lakes
are presented in Table 1.

     It was hypothesized that  if septic tanks played a major role in the
eutrophication of Island and  Sturgeon Lakes, an  increase  in the eutrophic
indicators  in the  sediment core should be  correlated  with  the  onset of
intense development around  both  lakes  (circa  1950).   Little Island Lake
would be expected to have relatively unchanged indicators through this time
period  because  no  onsite systems are  situated  on  its shore.    Alterna-
tively, if nutrient inputs  from  septic  tanks  played a minor role in the
eutrophication of the  two developed lakes, the trends of the  trophic indi-
cators for all three lakes should  have some degree of  consistency.

METHODS

     In March 1982,  two cores of 60  cm length  were taken  from  each of
Island, Sturgeon and Little  Island Lakes using a plexiglass piston corer
with a 11.25  cm  inside diameter.  One  core  was extruded in the field in 2
cm  sections  for determination  of  sedimentation  rates  using  Cesium-137
dating (Eberline Laboratories,  Inc., West Chicago, IL).  The other core was
sectioned  into  3  cm  sections  for determination  of diatom composition,
chlorophyll degradation products,  phosphorus fractions,  and organic matter.
The samples were stored  in sealed plastic bags  and frozen until analyzed.
                                  L-3

-------
Table 1.  Lake and watershed  parameters  for  Island,  Sturgeon,  and Little
          Island Lakes.   Information was  obtained  from recent  lake surveys
          conducted by WAPORA,  Inc. and Minnesota  Department of  Natural
          Resources, Fisheries  Section.
Number of onsite systems
Length of shoreline  (km)
Ratio onsite systems/km
 of lake shore
Watershed area  (ha)
Lake surface area  (ha)
Ratio watershed/lake surface
Mean Depth (m)
Mean Secchi disk (m)
Chlorophyll _a (ug/1)
Total phosphorus, winter
 values (mg/1)
Average Carlson Trophic
 Status Index
Current lake trophic status
 Island

 151
10.1
 1151
  211
  5.5
  3.4
  1.4 (n=24)
   29 (n=35)
              Sturgeon

                197
               12.9
560
686
0.8
6.9
2.4
  8
                   (n=24)
0.04 (n=4)    0.02 (n=4)
eutrophic    meso-eutrop.
          Little Island

                0
              1.7
 294
  17
17.3
 1.6
 0.9
  NA

 0.03 (n=2)
                             eutrophic
                                 L-4

-------
     Percent moisture  was determined by measuring  weight  loss of sediment
after a least 24 hours of dessication at 105° C.  Organic matter was deter-
mined after  weight  loss on ignition at 550° C for one hour.  Pigment anal-
ysis  was  performed on   wet  sediment  using the  procedure  of  Vallentyne
(1955).   Pigments were extracted with 90% acetone containing 0.5% dimethy-
lanaline  as  suggested  by Wetzel and Manny  (1978)  and reported as sedimen-
tary  pigment degradation unit  (SPDU)/gram dry weight.   The sediment phos-
phorus tractions of apatite phosphorus, nonapatite phosphorus, and organic
phosphorus were  determined following  the  methods  outlined by Williams et
al.  (1976a).  All  concentrations  have  been  reported  on  a  dry  sediment
basis.   The  diatom  preparation,  identification,  and enumeration  was con-
ducted following the methods of Bradbury (1975) .

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Sedimentation Rates
     Counting  the  activity  of   radioactive  Cesium  (Cesium-137)  in  lake
sediments  can  be used  to determine recent lake  sedimentation rates.   Ce-
sium-137 is  found  in lake sediments as a result of nuclear weapons testing
and  subsequent atmospheric  contamination by  the isotope.   Testing  first
began on a small scale in 1946 but increased in 1957 with the peak activity
occurring  in 1963-1964.  Because  a 6  to  12 month  delay typically occurs
between deposition of Cesium-137 in the watershed and delivery to the lake,
the maximum  peak  recorded in lake sediments is assumed to be 1965 (Ritchie
et al. 1973).

     The recent sedimentation rate in both Sturgeon Lake and Island Lake is
estimated  to range  between  0.41 -  0.44 cm year     (Figure  1).   At  this
sedimentation  rate,  a  1  cm segment would represent about  2.5 years.   The
sedimentation  rate  is  not as  easily  defined  in  Little Island  Lake,  but
because of  the nature of the increase  of  Cesium-137 activity at 5 cm, the
sedimentation  rate  is  estimated  to be  0.29  cm per  year  (J.  B.  McHenry,
personal comm.).   A 1 cm segment would represent about 3.45 years.  Extra-
polating sedimentation  rates to  the bottom of the core  represents a  time
period of  around  1835  for  Island and  Sturgeon Lakes,  and  around 1775 for
Little Island Lake.
                                 L-5

-------
        o_
        to—
                                                                                                           .13
                                                                                                           H
 U
 a
        o_
     i    i    i    r
                                                                                     I    I
                                                                                            O
                                                                                            u-l

                                                                                            cn
       eo-
 (3
r*.
                                                                                            rd
                                                                                            M


                                                                                            C
                                                                                            O
                                                                                            •H
                                                                                            -P
                                                                                            <0
                                                                                            -p  •
                                                                                            C W
                                                                                            (!) 0)
                                                                                            6 ^
                                                                                            •H flj
                                                                                                           
                                                                           J£

                                                                           2



                                                                           JO


                                                                           01
                                                                                 "t-l
                   1
                  cst
I    T   1
    CM
                                                    L-6

-------
     Although  the sedimentation rate varies  within a lake basin,  Davis and
 Ford  (1982) found  sediment arriving  in the deep  basin of a lake  is  well
 mixed  due  to  resuspension and reposition and  qualitatively  representative
 of much of  the  basin.   The sediment  cores  collected in this study  were  from
 the  deepest part  of the  lake basins.  The  Island and Little  Island  Lake
 watersheds  are  located  in  clayly glacial till.   One-half of Sturgeon Lake's
 watershed  is in  glacial  outwash  sand and the  other half is in the clayey
 glacial till.   Cores from  all  three lakes were taken in the  clayey  glacial
 till.

 Organic Matter  and  Chlorophyll Degradation Products

     In the Sturgeon Lake  core, organic matter (Figure 2) and  sedimentary
 chlorophyll degradation product  (Figure 3)   profiles showed little change
 over time.   Organic matter ranged from  19 to  23 percent  while  chlorophyll
 ranged  from 6  to 12 SPDU/gram dry  weight.   Organic matter was relatively
 unchanged  in the  lower part  of  the core although there was a slight  in-
 crease  above  12 cm (1955).   Chlorophyll degradation  products  increased
 slightly above  6  cm (1965) .

     In  the Island  Lake  core, organic  matter  (Figure  2) and  sedimentary
 chlorophyll degradation product values (Figure  3) are typically higher  than
 Sturgeon  Lakes values.   Organic  matter ranged from  20  to 30 percent  and
 tends  to  decline slightly  from the  bottom to  the  top of the core.  Since
 the  1950s  (above 12 cm) the  % organic matter  in the cores from Island  and
 Sturgeon  Lakes  is  similar.    Sedimentary  chlorophyll degradation products
 in the Island Lake  core ranged  from  14 to 30  SPDU/gram dry wt.  The  highest
 value  was  at  the  bottom  of the  core.   From  30  cm to  17 cm  (1910-1940)
 chlorophyll  decreased  somewhat.    Since  about 1940 (17  cm)  chlorophyll
 increased  (especially  in  the  top surficial  segment) but has not exceeded
 levels observed in  the  middle  of the core.
     In the Little Island Lake core, organic matter  (Figure 2) and sedimen-
tary chlorophyll  degradation product (Figure 3) values are generally grea-
ter than  either  Sturgeon or Island  Lakes  values.   The organic matter pro-
file shows  a declining  trend from  the bottom to the top  of the core and
values range  from 30 to 41  percent.   The  chlorophyll degradation products
                                  L-7

-------
             Figure 2
        % VOLATILE SOLIDS
           10
E
o
    15-
   30-
CL
LU
   45-
   60^
1960
1945-
1907	
                  ISLAND
             STURGEON
                 LITTLE
                  ISLAND
                   L-8

-------
            Figure 3
         CHLOROPHYLL
         (SPDU/gr. dry wt.)
    o
E
o
   15-
   30-
Q.
LJJ
Q
45-
   60^
     STURGEON
             ISLAND
LITTLE
ISLAND
               L-9

-------
 were  unusually low  at 19 cm  (1915-1920).   In  1918,  the Moose Lake  Forest
 Fire  burned much of the  lake's  watershed and may have had an  impact  on  the
 chlorophyll values.  Prior  to  1918,  chlorophyll values were  declining.   The
 next  core segment after 1918  (at  16 cm)  shows chlorophyll values returning
 to  pre-1918 levels.   Chlorophyll  in  the surficial core segment increased
 dramatically compared  to the underlying  3-6 cm  segment, but is comparable
 to values at the  bottom  of  the core.

     Although  chlorophyll degradation product concentrations  in  the sur-
 ficial sediments  increase sharply  for  both  Sturgeon and  Island  Lakes, there
 are parallel increases in Little Island Lake.  No reasons for  the increases
 are speculated  on but, because they occurred  in  all three  lakes, they  can
 not be  attributed strictly  to onsite systems.  Little  Island Lake has no
 onsite systems on its shoreline.

 Diatoms

     In the Sturgeon Lake core a  total  of  97 diatom taxa were identified.
 Melosira  ambigua  and Fragilaria construens v. venter were dominant species
 (Figure 4).  From 60 cm up  to 37  cm (1835  - 1890), _F. construens v. venter
 represented  20  to 40  percent  of  the  diatom community.  At 37 cm (1890),
 coinciding  with a decline in the  logging industry and an increase in farm-
 ing in  the  region  (Pine  County  1947),  F. construens  v.  venter  strongly
 declined  and M. ambigua, a planktonic diatom, increased.  Between 17 cm and
 7 cm (1940 - 1965) the percentage  of littoral species increased (especially
 Achnanthes  spp. ,  Eunotia jge_c_tinalis,  and  E^_ incisa) while  M._ ambigua de-
 clined.    Grouping eutrophic diatom  indicators together  indicates  a trend
 toward eutrophic  conditions  starting in  the 1960s.  However, the continued
 presence  of Cyclotella  bodanica  and  the  high  level of Melosira  ambigua
 indicate  the lake's  trophic status has not changed  drastically during the
 time period covered by the sediment core.   Similarly, the percent of eutro-
phic  indicators  above the  fern level  is  comparable to  the percent repre-
senting the 1890s.

     In the Island Lake  core  a  total  of 118 diatom  taxa were identified.
The dominant species are Melosira  ambigua, M. italica, and Tabelaria fenes-
 tjrata  (Figure  5).   These  species are representative  of mesotrophic-type
                                 L-10

-------
            Il
s
co
£
     ^



  v>
      X.
      •Sc,
       "•*/.
         e/v.
      X
   -'
-------
                                           8
s
                                                                    0)
                                                               2   H
                                                                    I
                                                                    )H
                                                                   -P
                                                                    O
                                                                  -  
-------
conditions  (Davis  and  Larson 1976)  and  give  the  mesotrophic  indicator
species a  majority of the diatom  community percentage.   However, above  20
cm  (1935),  M.  italica dramatically decreases  in abundance while  M. ambigua
remain high.  Also at about 1935,  Cocconeis pjlacentula, Melosira  granulata,
and Fragilaria crotonensis either  first appeared or Increased  In  abundance,
resulting in an increase in the percentage  of  eutrophic indicators.

     In the Little Island Lake core a  total of 107 diatom taxa were identi-
fied.  The  diatom stratigraphy is much different compared to  the other two
lakes.  Most of the  species identified are  not associated with the pelagial
community.   Although no  single species  dominates  the community like Me-^
losira ambigua does  in Island and Sturgeon Lakes, Fragilaria  construens v.
venter and  Melosira  binderana were common  (Figure  6).   The diatom strati-
graphy showed  few changes  throughout the  core.   Starting  at about 20 cm
(1916)  there  was a gradual  but  definite  increase  in  the  abundance  of
Achnanthes  lancelata, Cocconeis placentula,   Fragilaria capucina,  and Na-
vicula cryptocephala.  All  four species have  been found in  eutrophic lakes
or ponds (Jorgensen  1948, Stormer  and  Young 1970).

     Changes in the  diatom community have been interpreted in a qualitative
context with indicator  species assigned to one of three categories; eutro-
phic, mesotrophic, and  other.  The "other" category includes species asso-
ciated with benthic  conditions  or species  that  have no  specific trophic
affiliation.  Assignments  to a  category  were made with  the usual assump-
tions and  limitations that  have been  expressed by  other  authors  (Bradbury
1975, Kalff and Knoechel 1978, Harris  and Vollenweider 1982).

     In  Sturgeon  Lake,  the  percent  of  eutrophic  indicator diatoms  has
increased  twice   since  the  1920s.  The  second  increase,  starting  in the
1960s, coincides with the onset of rapid residential development around the
lake.  However,  the   percent  of  eutrophic  indicators  found after  1960  is
still less  than  what was  found in segments representing  the early 1900s.
Island Lake  showed  an increase  in eutrophic  indicators that  dates  to the
1930s.   However,  onsite  systems  probably  were  insignificant  nutrient
sources in  the 1930s.  It  was not until  the  end  of that decade that elec-
tricity became available in the area for well  pumps and it was not
                                 L-13

-------
•a

JS
(A
X,  x
      %,
 X.
"to.
     '«*
   X>
               -'•'*<>,
                 ^
                  '*
          V
           X
             *>«.
   ^
        %
           '<*
              *k
                ^
                                                                                     
-------
until  the 1940s  that most  cabins installed indoor plumbing  (Don  Classen,
City  clerk,  pers.  coram.).   Until the decade  of  the 40s, nearly all  lake-
shore  residences  were  seasonal  and used privies  for  waste  treatment.
Because  of the  minimal  water use in  residences  that  have privies and  be-
cause  the privy  pit is  usually in unsaturated  soils,  there was  probably
little  nutrient input  from the  seasonally used privies.  Coinciding with
the  increase in  eutrophic  indicators for  Island Lake  in the 1930s was  a
peak  in  agricultural land  use  intensity (USDA Census records) and  a severe
drought  lasting  several years  which  lowered  both  groundwater  levels  and
lake  levels  (David Ford, MDNR,  pers.  comm.)   A drought  would have  affected
the lake  similarly whether  onsite systems or agricultural  land use  were  the
impetus  for an increase  in eutrophic  diatom indicators.   But,  based on
literature values  for loading rates  (USEPA  1980)  and on  land  use character-
istics  in the  watersheds,   the  agricultural component  would contribute  a
much  higher  phosphorus  load than onsite systems.   Little Island Lake  has
the most diverse diatom  community (based on average Shannon-Weiner  values).
Although  Little Island  Lake had  the  highest  percentage of eutrophic indi-
cators,  it also had  the highest  percentage of  littoral  or benthic  species.
Because  Little  Island Lake now  has  a large macrophyte community  covering
30% of the surface area  (MDNR 1975, unpublished)  the consistancy of benthic
and  littoral species in the  core indicates  Little  Island  Lake  has been
shallow and  productive,  probably predating the earliest sediment core date
of 1775.

Phosphorus

     Phosphorus in the sediment  cores  was fractioned into three categories;
apatite  phosphorus   (A-P),   nonapatite  inorganic phosphorus  (NAI-P),  and
organic  phosphorus   (org-P).   Apatite  phosphorus  represents  phosphorus
present  in the crystal  lattices of  apatite  grains  and generally  is  of
detrital  origin (Williams et al. 1976a).   Nonapatitic inorganic phosphorus
consists  of  phosphorus  not associated  with  A-P or org-P,  and  orginates
naturally, (i.e. by chemical weathering  in  the  watershed) or from anthropo-
genic sources  (i.e.  fertilizers,  septic tank  drainfields,  etc).   Organic
phosphorus  includes  all phosphorus  associated with organic  molecules  or
more specifically  with   carbon  atoms  by C-O-P or C-P bonds  and may  be an
indicator of lake productivty.
                                 L-15

-------
(WO) Hld3Q
      L-16

-------
     In  Sturgeon  Lake,  the apatite-P Is relatively constant  throughout  the
length  of the  core (Figure  7).   NAI-P increases  above 15  cm (1945)  but
decreases  at 5 cm (1970).   Org-P  is also  fairly  constant  throughout  the
length  of the  core with a  slight  increase  above  5 cm (1970).   Of the 3
lakes,  Sturgeon Lake has  the  highest  total phosphorus concentration  in sur-
ficial  sediments.

     In  Island  Lake, total phosphorus was highest at the bottom of the core
and  declined until about  the 43  cm segment  (1875)  (Figure  7).   It  was
somewhat  steady from 43 cm to  35 cm and then increased to a peak of about
1.25 mg/g near the middle of  the  core, the 25 to  30  cm segment, (circa
1910).   NAI-P  makes  up  the  largest  percentage of  the  three phosphorus
fractions  and  increases  above the  7 cm mark  (1965).   The  Org-P  and  A-P
fractions were  relatively constant throughout the sediment core.

     Historically,  Little Island Lake had high  total  phosphorus values in
the  sediments  except  for  the period  of  1915-1920.  Otherwise  the three
phosphorus  fractions were  relatively  constant,  only  slightly increasing
since the  1940s.   The organic phosphorus levels  are  higher  than the other
two lakes indicating Little Island may be more productive.

     An  increase  in sedimentary phosphorus concentrations in Sturgeon Lake
beginning  in   the  1950s  coincides  with  increased  housing development.
However,  if  these  phosphorus trends were related  to onsite  system use, a
phosphorus  decline In  the  sediment  core  from 1970  to  1980 would  not  be
expected.  The  explanation may be tied to a  farmstead adjoining the shore-
line.   On  the northeast shoreline lies one  farm  house,  a barn, and a pas-
ture sloping  toward the lake.  The current owner of the property purchased
the farm acreage In 1947 and  immediately thereafter expanded  dairy and crop
operations.   The  owner has  stated  that prior  to  1947  there was not much
farming activity on this acreage.  The owner retired in  1970  and since that
time there has  been no active farming. The phosphorus increase and decrease
in the  core  correlates  over  time with the reported changes in this farming
operation.   In a  small watershed,   without  other major nutrient sources,
this potential source  of  phosphorus could  be  significant.    Most  of   the
phosphorus in the 15 cm  to 5 cm segment is  in  the NAI-P fraction.   Since
                                  L-17

-------
org-P  and chlorophyll degradation  products in  this segment did  not show
parallel  increases,  this  increased  phosphorus did not increase phytoplank-
ton  productivity, although  the  percent of  eutrophic indicators  did in-
crease.

     The  rapid conversion  of  forested  land  to agricultural  use  in the
Island  Lake watershed  may have  been responsible  for the  phosphorus in-
creases following  the  1890s.   The Hinckly Forest Fire of 1894 which burned
much of the region apparently did not burn Island Lake's watershed, but did
hasten  the  conversion  of  the lumbering  economy  to  an agricultural economy
in  the area.   Farmlands  extended  to  the  lake  until at least  the early
1920s,  when  the  land was subdivided for development.  After the 1950s, the
phosphorus profile in  Island  Lake decreased until  1970,  when it increased
slightly.   Housing  units  around the  lake  have increased  in  number ex-
ponentially  since  the  1950s,  and numbers  of  planktivorous fish  have in-
creased dramatically since  1970 as well.   It is speculated that there may
be a  link with fishing pressure, an increase  in planktivorous fish, and a
decrease  in  zooplankton:  resulting  in increased phytoplankton and  sediment
phosphorus in the lake after 1970 (Table 2).

     The  phosphorus  profile  for Little Island  Lake has  been relatively
constant  except  for  the -short segment where there  was  a sharp phosphorus
decline and  recovery.   A  similar change in  chlorophyll  was observed over
this  short segment.   Extrapolating from  the Cesium-137  derived   sedimen-
tation  rate,  this segment of  lowest phosphorus  and chlorophyll concentra-
tion  was  dated 1915-1920,  and corresponds  to  the  time  of  the Moose Lake
Fire  (1918).   A  1918 U.S.  Forest Service map indicated that most of Little
Island  Lake's  watershed  burned,  a small portion of  Island Lake's watershed
burned, and none of  Sturgeon Lake's watershed burned in this fire.

     The  high total phosphorus and high  org-P  fractions  indicate Little
Island  Lake has  always been  productive.   The  primary vestibule  of pro-
ductivity is macrophytes.   The bottom sediments are of a peaty composition
with a high organic  matter content.
                                 L-18

-------
Addressing the Hypothesis

     Because  the  increase in  eutrophication  indicators  in  Sturgeon and
Island Lakes  is  not readily correlated with an increasing number of onsite
systems  (circa  1950),  onsite  systems do not appear  to be the predominate
cause of  eutrophication in Island or Sturgeon Lakes.   The results from the
sediment  core analysis somewhat  support the  alternative  hypothesis that
sediment  core profiles  from  all three  lakes  follow  similar  trends.   All
three lakes are  limnologically distinct; however, similar trends are  found
in all three  lakes in the respect that sediment core profiles have reflect-
ed  the  impact  of  significant events  in  the  watershed.    If  onsite tank
systems had an impact on the lakes through nutrient enrichment, the effects
were masked by contributions from other sources.

     Analysis of  the sediment  core from  Shagawa Lake, Minnesota shows that
distinct  changes  in trophic  status  could  be attributable  to point source
wastewater  discharges  from  a  small  municipal wastewater  treatment  plant
(Bradbury 1975,  1978).   This  study did not show evidence of those types of
changes correlated  with the increasing introduction  of the diffuse waste-
water flows  from onsite  systems.   The  basic  trophic  trends  in all three
lakes appear  to  have been established prior  to the  time period covered by
our  sediment  cores.   In addition, unpublished  MDNR  fishery records (1938,
1955, 1967, 1970, 1975, 1979)  cover the period when development was rapidly
increasing around  Sturgeon and Island Lakes and indicate Secchi disk depth
readings have changed less than 1 meter for Sturgeon and Island Lakes since
1938 (Table 2).

     Based on our  results of  the sediment  core data  for the three seepage
lakes in  north  central  Minnesota,  the  predominant  characteristics  of the
lake's watersheds  have  an overriding influence  on their  trophic  status.
The contribution of  onsite systems to eutrophication in Island or Sturgeon
Lakes appears to  be  low and this should  be a consideration in determining
the  effectiveness  of  sewering  these  lakes  to  remove the  nutrient  input
associated with onsite systems.
                                 L-19

-------
Acknowledgements

     This  project was  funded  by USEPA as part  of  an Environmental Impact
Statement  for  determining wastewater  treatment  alternatives  in  the Moose
Lake,  Minnesota  area.   Mr.  J.  Novak  was project  monitor.  We  thank M.
Brookfield for  performing the  diatom analysis and  E.  Dahlen,  R.  Kulb, and
R.  Wedepohl  for  field  assistance.   We appreciate  the review and comments
made by  J. Lens sen.   We thank  Mrs.  D. Jackson-Hope  for  typing  the manu-
script.
                                 L-20

-------
Table 2,
Summary of data from Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
fisheries lake surveys.
 Date
   House Count
Sturgeon   Island
   Secchi Disc
   Measurement
Sturgeon   Island
  PlanktIvor cms
      Fish
Sturgeon   Island
1982 -- — 2.4
1979-80 208 169 2.3
1975 170 — 2.4
1970 — 128
1967 120 110 2.9
1954-55 81 35
1938 — — 2.4
1.4
1.3 57
2.0 18
1.4
1.7 47
1.1 30
__ —
—
189
—
20
57
37
— *~
 Planktivorous fish include yellow perch, bluegill, pumkinseed, and
 black crappie.  Values represent number of fish caught per set and
 includes trapnets and gillnets.
                                 L-21

-------
                       -Supplemental  Information-

               and  means of  sediment parameters from
        sediment cores.
                                                                Little

CaCO
(%)
Organic Matter
%
Chlorophyll
{SPDU/g. org. matt.)
Total Phosphorus
(mg/g dry wt . )
Organic Phosphorus
(mg/g dry wt . )
Inorganic Phosphorus
(mg/g dry wt . )
Apatite Phosphorus
(mg/g dry wt . }
Nonapatite Inorganic P.
{mg/g dry wt . )
Island Lake
0.7-3.3
1.7
20.8-29.4
25.6
57.4-102.0
79.4
0.80-1.72
1.07
0.21-0.52
0.34
0.44-1.20
0.73
0.08-0.24
0.15
0.29-1.05
0.58
Sturgeon Lake
0.7-1.9
1.3
19.0-22.9
20.4
32.6-54.8
40.7
0.80-1.50
0.95
0.15-0.40
0.27
0.39-1.18
0.68
0.22-0.37
0.27
0.15-0.92
0.41
Island
0.8-1.
1.2
29.8-41
36. £
31.0-1.
83.3
0.54-1
1.12
0.26-C
0.51
0.28-C
0..61
0.04-C
O.OS
0.24-C
0.52
Lake
8

.1

2.3

.32

.64

.72

.14

.63

aNote that chlorophyll breakdown products are presented herein on
 a gram of dry organic matter basis.
                               1-22

-------
Literature Cited

Bradbury,  J.P.   1975.   Diatom stratigraphy and human settlement in
      Minnesota.   U.S.  Geol.  Surv.,  Special Paper 171. 74 p.

Bradbury,  J.P.   1978.   A paleolimnological comparison of Burntside
      and  Shagawa Lakes, northeastern Minnesota.   EPA Ecol.  Res. Series,
      EPA-600/3-78-004.

Bradbury,  J.P. and  J.C.B.  Waddington.   1973.   The impact of European
      settlement  on  Shagawa Lake,  northeastern  Minnesota, pp.  289-307
      in,  Bisks,  H.J.B.  and West,  R.G.  (eds.).   Quaternary plant ecology.
      Blackwells,  Oxford.   326 p.

Davis,  M.B. and  M.S. Ford.  1982.  Sediment focusing in Mirror Lake, New
      Hampshire.   Limnol.  Oceanogr.  27:137-150.

Dean, W.E.  1974.   Determination  of carbonate  and organic matter in
      calcareous  sediments  and  sedimentary  rocks  by loss on  ignition:
      comparison  with other methods.   J.  Sed. Petr.  44:242-248.

Dillon, P.J. and W.B.  Kirchner.   1975.   The effects of  geology  and land
      use  on the  export  of  phosphorus from  watersheds.   Water Res.  9:
      135-148.

Dillon, P.J. and F.H. Rigler.   1975.  A  simple method  for predicting
      the capacity of a  lake  for development based  on lake trophic  status.
      J. Fish. Res.  Board Can.  32:1519-1531.

Harris, G.P. and R.A. Vollenweider.   1982.   Paleolimnological  evidence
      of early eutrophication in Lake  Erie.   Can.  J.  Fish. Aquat.  Sci.
      39:618-626.

Kalff, J. and R. Knoechel.   1978.   Phytoplankton and  their  dynamics  in
      oligotrophic and eutrophic lakes.   Ann. Rev.  Ecol.  Syst.  9:475-495.

Kerfoot, W.B. and S.M.  Skinner, Jr.   1981.   Septic  leachate surveys  for
      lakeside sewer needs  evaluation.  J. Water  Poll. Cont.  Fed. 53:
      1717-1725.

Lee,  D.R.  1976.  The role of  groundwater  in eutrophication of  a lake
      in glacial outwash terrain.  Intern. J. Speleol. 8:117-126.

Lee,  D.R.  1977.  A device for measuring seepage  flux in lakes  and
      estuaries.  Limnol. Oceanogr.  22:140-147.

Viraraghavan, T. and R.G. Warnock.   1976.   Groundwater  quality  adjacent
      to a septic tank system.  J. Am. Water Works Assn.  68:611-614.

Williams, J.D.H., T.P. Murphy, and T. Mayer.   1976.  Rates  of
     accumulation of phosphorus forms in Lake Erie  sediments.   J. Fish.
      Res. Board Can. 33:430-439.

Williams, J.D.H., J.-M. Jaquet, and R.L. Thomas.   1976.   Forms  of
      phosphorus in  the  surficial  sediments  of Lake  Erie.  J. Fish. Res.
     Board Can. 33:413-429.
                                 L-23

-------

-------
                            Traffic Data
                                    ,  i:
         ?t-*F.±. >/:.>^  -- ..X*     v;    '. 2^ •:•-..'   •
         \r- ' if." =•';-. .-^Vr~^;>—:—•-y^-«*^-^-r>-;=.~--^- ...•..•>._".-,.r - j- ,>
         / •" •  ••*•'•.'" •"'  :--  .".''»-" *     :••.'•          Q    '  -
         J--;. -rj'--?^*.->-,-.-}   '.*;-;•''..;•;          •   -  ^r   .-   ;'.;_:'

             1^'-  -'^   •?/?   :••"'• 2*9 •        zf?- '       :"
          .'•'. i&vV"" ""':      :---:-;;;-" -y  '^Q' :~'  "~2sd~J.
   Figure M-l.  1979  average annual daily traffic  in northwestern Pine

                 County (MOOT).  Traffic volume  on  the state highway is

                 for  1978.
Figure  M-1.
                                                                                         o
                                                                                        •H
                                                                                        H-l
                                                                                         M
                                                                                        H

                                                                                         t

                                                                                        £
                                         M-l

-------

-------
                                  Energy Data
Figure N-l.Unit price for residental energy during the period from April 1980
           to March 1981 (Minnesota Energy Agency 1981).

                                                        Fuel Type
Location
Region 3
Region 7E
Minnesota
Use
Space heating
Non-space heating
Space heating
Non-space heating
Space heating
Non-space heating
Natural Gas
(per 1,000
cubic feet)
$3.70
4.42
3.33
3.85
3.51
4.10
Electricity
(per Kelo
watt hour)
4.72C
5.46
4.70
5.53
3.64
5.21
Fuel Oil
(per gallon)
$1.22
1.17
1.16
LP Gas
(per gallon)
71. 1C
74.7
69.8
  The basis for heating values of the fuels are:

      Natural gas: 1,000 BTU per cubic feet
      Electricity: 3,412 BTU per KW hour
      Distillate
        Composite (fuel oil): 138,690 BTU per gallon
      Propane: 91,500 BTU per gallon
                                                                                           cd
                                                                                           *j

                                                                                           Q
                                                                                           60
                                                                                           M
                                                                                           0)
                                                                                          53
                                                                                          a

                                                                                          I
                                       N-l

-------

-------
\
I


-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Region 5
Water Division 5WFI-12
230 South Dearborn Street
Chicago, Illinois 60604
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use
$300
                                                                  Postage and
                                                                     Fees Paid
                                                                Environmental
                                                                    Protection
                                                                       Agency
                                                                     EPA-335
                                                                                                               Third Class
                                                                                                               Bulk

-------