-------
Exhibit A
Page 2 of 6
Explanatory Notes of Adjustments
Blue, Inc.
The total direct labor hours are as per RFP specifications. Professional level
1 is three (3) short of RFP specifications. Technician level 3 is three (3)
hours over RFP specifications. The prime contractor and the subcontractors
proposed a total of 900 hours for direct secretarial labor. The prime
contractor proposed direct labor escalation factors of approximately 3.2% for
the base 6,000 hours and 7.61 for the 3rOOO option hours applied to current
rates. The proposed subcontractor, Associates, Inc., proposed 3% escalation
for the base 6,000 hours and 7.6% escalation for the option 3,000 hours applied
to current rates. The proposed suhcon tractor, (ABC) proposed direct labor
escalation factors as follows:
Base 6,000 hours
Professional Levels 3 & 4 - 12% applied to current rates
Professional Levels 2 & 1 - 7.3% applied to current rates
*
Option 3,000 hours s'
Professional Levels 3 & 4 - 16.7% applied to current rates
Professional Levels 1 & 2 - 10,2% applied to current rates
APC did not include any names in their cost proposal for proposed employees.
Therefore, we could not compare employees in the cost proposal with employees
in the technical proposal. The prime contractor and Associates utilized
the same employees for cost and technical proposals.
The prime contractor did not propose any escalation for the proposed
.consultants. Since he proposed most of the consulting hours for the base
LOE, we made no adjustment for consultants.
White Corporation
The total direct labor hours are as per RFP specifications. Professional
level 1 is three (3) hours short of RFP specifications. Technician level 3
is three (3) hours over RFP specifications. Direct labor escalation is
based on 9.5% applied to a base rate as of the date that rate is effective
through the midpoint period of performance. An additional 720 hours for
technical assistant has been proposed.
i)
(8/90)
III- 18
-------
Exhibit A
Page 3 of 6
The proposed subcontractor is Brown Company. There are no SF 1411's for
the subcontractor. It appears that fully loaded hourly rates have been
used for pricing the proposed cost for the subcontractor, we cannot
determine if any adjustment is required for the subcontractor. There is
no escalation proposed for the proposed consultants. The sane proposed
employees appeared in the cost and technical proposals.
Red Cor^>any
The total direct labor hours are as per RFP specifications. Professional
level 1 is three (3) over RFP specifications. Technician level 3 is three
(3) hours short of RFP specifications. The prime contractor has proposed
1,190 hours of direct secretarial labor.
The direct labor escalation factors for the prime contractor are 16.05% for
the base 6,000 hours and 32.09% for the option 3,000 hours. This is based
on the conpany's historical salary escalation of 10% per year.
The direct labor escalation factor for the proposed subcontractor, Research
Systems, Inc., ie based on a 10% increase effective January 1 of each year.
*
The direct labor escalation factor for the proposed subcontractor, Associates
is based on increases of 7% each calendar year.
The proposed employees are the sarne in both the cost and technical proposals.
There are no surtnary SF 1411's for the subcontractors.
Green Associates
The contractor is short 54 hours for professional level 4. Vte added the
cost for these hours to the direct labor for the prime contractor. The
cost proposal states that a 7% escalation factor is used. Since the sane
hourly rates were used throughout the proposal, we could not determine if
escalation is included. Labor category rates were used to calculate the
proposed costs. Individuals were named in the technical proposal.
There was no escalation proposed for the proposed consultants.
(8/90)
III- 19
-------
Exhibit A
. • Page 4 of 6
The proposed subcontractor, Mutt and Jeff have proposed fully loaded hourly IB '
rates. We cannot determine the specific makeup of these rates and therefore
cannot determine if any adjustments are required. They included a copy of
their "Usual Day Rates". We could not determine how their labor categories
correlated with the RFP labor categories. There is a potential for under-
statement for costs due to the range in cost per 8 hour day.
There is no escalation proposed for the subcontractor.
Yellow, Inc.
The total hours proposed are as per RFP specifications. Professional
levels 2 and 1 and technician level 3 are proposed in accordance with RFP.
Because the subcontractor proposed hours for consultants without identifying
which RFP labor category they belonged to, we could not determine:the hours.
proposed for professional levels 3 and 4.
The direct labor escalation factor for both the prime and the subcontractor
(and the subcontractor's consultants) is 5% for the optional 3,000 hours.*
•
There were no nanes for proposed employees included in the cost proposal.-
Therefore, no comparison could be made with the technical proposal.
Lilac, Inc.
The proposed direct labor hours are in accordance with.RFP specifications.
The prime contractor proposed an additional 1,020 hours for direct
secretarial and administrative labor.
Direct labor escalation for the prime contractor is a composite amount
covering the three year period. There was not sufficient information to
allow us to determine the percentage of increase for each year. . They state
in the proposal that it is 5% per annum.
'Proposed subcontractor, Mee, Inc., escalated professional level 4 7.2% and
professional level 3 1.8% for the optional 3,000 hours. There was no
escalation for professional level 2.
Proposed subcontractor, Associates, Inc., proposed no escalation.
(8/90)
-------
*
Exhibit A
Page 5 of 6
The prime contractor proposed category averages. Mee, Inc., did not include
any names in the cost proposal for proposed employees. Associates, Inc.
proposed the same employees in both the cost and technical proposals.
Associates should identify the proposed employees with the RFP labor
categories.
The $1,259 adjustment is for Mee, Inc. They proposed a 10% fee of estimated
cost, we limited the fee to 8.5% of estimated cost.
•Orange Systems, Inc.
The proposed direct labor hours are in accordance with RFP specifications.
Proposed subcontractors, E. C., proposed 115 hours of direct secretarial
labor. The direct labor escalation for the prime contractor is based on
a 6% increase for 1983 and a 5% increase for 1984. Subcontractor proposed
no escalation.
Subcontractor, E. C. proposed an escalation of.5% for 1982.and 5.25% for
1983. 5
* «.
There is no escalation for the proposed consultants.
.">,
'The proposed employees are the same in both the cost and technical proposal.
•'Aqua Associates
*
fThe direct labor hours are in accordance with RFP specifications.
"are 900 hours of direct clerical labor proposed.
There
There are no employees named in the cost proposals < for prime contractor and
subcontractor). Therefore, we could not make any comparison with the
technical proposal. We did note that Aqua listed four consultants in their
technical proposal and no consultants were proposed in the cost proposal.
The direct labor escalation for the prime contractor is 7.6% for the base
6,000 hours and 9.2% for the optional 3,000 hours. The direct labor
escalation for the subcontractor is based on approximately 10% increase on
July 1, 1983, and 10% increase on July 1, 1984.
The subcontractor increased his overhead rate for each of his fiscal years
covered by the proposed contract. For comparison purposes we computed costs
using the base year rate for the entire proposed period. The subcontractor
proposed a fee of approximately 19.9% of estimated cost. We limited fee to
8.5% of estimated cost. The 310,812 adjustment consists of S708 for
indirect costs and $10,104 for fee.
(8/90)
III- 21
-------
Exhibit A
Page 6 of 6
Peachy Inc.
The total direct labor hours are in accordance with RFP specifications. The
proposed subcontractor, Malcolm Lord, Inc., did not propose his hours as
allocated by the prime contractor. {See Other Conroents.) The difference in
cost would be insignificant, so we nade no adjustment.
There are 666 hours of direct secretarial labor proposed. The direct labor
escalation factors are as follows:
Peach Inc.
Malcoln Lord
Act Incorporated
Teal Associates, Inc.
6.5% for the base 6,000 hours
16.6% for the option 3,000 hours
6.5% for the base 6,000 hours
16.6% for the option 3,000hours
6.8% for the option 3,000 hours
8% for the base 6,000 hours
8% for the option 3,000 hours
There was no escalation proposed for the consultants. There were no nanes
for proposed employees in the cost proposal.
>•)
(8/90)
III- 22
-------
**
og
in
c
>
fi
o
u
v*
ft
a
(0 M
ffi M
ract
OS
%
c
in
m
«5
in
cs
SCO
JJ
_ f* C
C *J 02
& * S
O N O
u •- m
0. *i 3
s
CN
in
S *
in
QC ON
VC
S
s
in
in
m
•5
•a
w
N
Ł 2SC
2 a T5 >. •«-
H 3 itt ** f^
X •""•* C l-i 9
vy
o-
m
in
in
vo
vo
ve
o
g
Ł
21
X
2
|
I.
••« tn
•»* M
"^ 0
52
B CO
A3
Ł
« o
I S
-- a
-•g 1
•W *
(8/90)
III - 23
-------
Exhibit B
Page 2 of 3
Explanatory Notes
Blue, Inc.
The travel and ODC are as per RFP specifications.
White Corporation
The 827,393 increase is for the ODC and its applicable FICON and G&A.
The prime contractor proposed 867,426 for ODC on the OF 60. We could not
determine if the remainder of the 890,000 specified in the RFP was included
anywhere else in the proposal. Therefore, we added the additional ODC and
its applicable indirect burden.
The travel is per RFP specifications.
Fed Company
The travel and ODC are as per RFP specifications.
Green Associates • »
*
The S7,100 increase includes the direct labor adjustment explained in
Exhibit A and its applicable overhead and G&A. It also includes an adjustne
to travel. The contractor proposed travel of 8180. This was for 18 trips
from Vienna, Virginia to Washington, D.C. In the proposal the contractor
says the work would be perfomed in Cambridge, MA. We priced 18 roundtrips
from Boston, MA to Washington, D.C. The airline fare.guide listed a range
for economy class from 839 to 8123 one way. We used the 8128 one way fare,
but did not price out any per dien or ground transportation costs.
Yellow, Inc.
The travel and ODC are in accordance with RFP specifications.
Lilac, Inc.
Proposed travel and ODC are in accordance with RFP specifications. We
increased the ODC for Lilac by 82,664. It is Lilac's company policy to
direct charge indirect telephone based on direct labor hours, wfe used S.37
per each direct labor hour. This rate was recently recommended by DCAA.
The applicable G&A was added to the additional ODC.
Lilac used a composite rate for fringe benefits and G&A. Since the variance
between each year is small and since he does not show which hours are in
each year, we made no adjustment.
Orange Systems, Inc. _
The proposed travel and ODC are in accordance with RFP specifications. ^^ '
(8/90)
-------
r
Exhibit B
Page 3 of 3
Aqua Associates
The proposed travel and ODC are in accordance with RFP specifications.
The adjustments are for the proposed subcontractor and are explained
in Exhibit A.
Peachy Inc.
The proposed travel and ODC are in accordance with RFP specifications.
(8/90)
III - 25
-------
I
Review of RFP*s - Another function of the cost advisory
offices is the review of PFP's prior to their publication
in Commerce Business Daily. The contract specialist is
provided with written comments from a cost analyst who may
assist in clarifying ambiguous or erroneous statements in a
given RFP, particularly in the instructions of cost proposal
preparation. The clarification of RFP instructions may
alleviate the subsequent submission by offerers of incomplete
cost proposals and avoid delays in the acquisition process
caused by the need to request additional information.
An example follows:
h
(8/90)
III- 26
-------
May 15, 1984
Comments on RFP WA84-XXXX: Waste Technology and Studies
Support
John J. Smith
Chief, Cost Advisory Operations
Procurement Branch X
Attention: Rodney Craft
On page 10, paragraph F.4 - the end of the period of
performance is missing.
Attachment C - We recommend adding the following
sentences:
A. Under Travel Budget - the total amount for travel
is $360,000.
B. Under ODC Budget - The total amount for ODC is
5360,000.
C. Under Computer Budget - The total amount for computers
is 590,000.
D. On page 3 of Attachment C, add the following sentence
to the first paragraph. Include a schedule showing
the distribution of hours among the prime contactor,
subcontractors and consultants.
On page 3 of attachment C. there is a typographical error
- Standard Form 4411 should be 1411.
For the optional 45,000 hours in the base period, the RFP
should provide more pricing guidance since this covers a
two year period. should the contractors assume 50% of
the hours will be used in each of the base period years?
Should the contractors assume all the hours will be used
in year 2 of the base period? For pricing purposes,
include an assumption as to when the hours will be used.
If we can be of further assistance, please contact Jane Doe
on extension 382-3666.
(8/90)
III- 27
-------
The Review Program for Cost and Price Analysis.
When the contracting officer requests cost analysis from the
advisory office, the cost analyst performs a specific set of
steps. This set of steps is the "Review Program"."
Following the review program assures that at a minimum, specific
techniques and analysis are applied to all cost proposals
regardless of whom is performing the cost analysis. It also
provides documentation to the extent a particular step was
or was not performed.
Keep in mind the review program is only a guide and the degree
of cost analysis depends on the particular situation encountered
by the cost analysis.
When the circumstances are appropriate for contracting officers
or contract specialists to perform their own cost or price
analysis, it is suggested that the review program be used as a guide.
111-28
(Revised 8/90)
-------
Environmental Protection Agency
Cost Advisory Section
Review Program
( CTMSfTr .TrCVTTTl )
Work Paper
. Reference
(page ID No. )
A. GENERAL
1. Review request for cost analysis. Attached to the _
request should be the contractor's proposal
(including subcontractors) and a copy of the RFP.
Determine scope of review and areas to be covered.
Determine priority.
2. Acknowledge request and if possible, give estimated _
completion date.
3. Determine if a formal PACER (Preliminary Analytical _
Cost Evaluation Report) was prepared. If so, review
PACER report to determine if there were any
deficiencies and/or corrections. If not, reconcile
the proposal to determine if it is current and has
been submitted in accordance with the instructions
provided in the RFP. If the proposal does not
reconcile to the RFP, the recomnended costs should
reflect the hours and costs as specified in the RFP.
4. Has a technical evaluation been incorporated for
those instances in which tech technical input is
necessary (generally non-LOE procurements)? If not
the cost advisory report should be qualified
accordingly. If a technical evaluation is not
necessary, provide a statement to that effect with
the reason(s).
5. Check computations and footings in proposal for _
accuracy.
6. Determine if a revised proposal is pending. _
If so, discuss with the requestor whether it would
be in the government's best interest to review the
original proposal or wait and review the revised
proposal .
7. Where applicable, are significant differences _
between revised and original proposals adequately
analyzed and explained.
8. Determine if the cost review can be performed in- _
house based on available cost and pricing data.
If so, proceed to Section C.
9. If data in files is insufficient and/or not _
available, proceed to Section B - Assist Audits.
IH-29
(Revised 8/90)
-------
- 2 -
Environmental Protection Agency
Cost Advisory Section
Review Program
(OOKSOLIEftTED)
Work Paper
Reference
(page ID tfc>.
B. ASSIST AUDITS
1. If data in files is insufficient and/or dollar
thresholds are met, request an assist audit with
the cognizant government audit agency.
2. For competitive procurements, stress the need in
the request for the costs representative of the
hours and QDCs as specf ied in the RFP and rates
reflective of historical and/or actual experience.
3. Specifically address any audit areas of special
concern (i.e. uncompensated labor and how it is
handled, if any, indirect rate structure changes,
etc.)
4. Upon receipt of the verbal results of audit, or
written audit report, determine if the audit was
performed as requested.
C. DIRECT IABOR
1. Determine the basis of the proposed labor rate(s),
including the effective date of the rates.
(category average, individual average, weighted
average, straight average, etc.)
2. Verify the proposed rates with; the cognizant
government audit agency (verbal and/or written),
data available in EPA files, information (payroll
verification) submitted by the contractor, or
information/verification available through other
government agencies.
3. Determine the reasonableness and acceptability of
labor escalation. Determine the basis of the labor
escalation, i.e. computed by employee anniversary
date, annual increase date or common review date.
4. Determine where the contractor proposes and
recovers their indirect time (vacation, sick and
holidays).
5. compute labor costs reflective of hours as
specifed in the RFP and hourly rates reflective
of historical and/or actual experience.
111-30
(Revised 8/90)
-------
-3-
Environmental Protection Agency
Cost Advisory section
Review Program
(CXWSQLIIMED)
Work Paper
Reference
(page ID No.}
6. Does the contractor maintain the labor records
necessary to record uncompensated overtime? If not,
go to Section D - Indirect Cost Rates review.
If the answer is yes:
Evaluate uncompensated overtime under both cost
realism provisions and the Evaluation of
Compensation for Professional Employees clause
(Federal Acquisition Regulation 52.222-46). If
necessary, included specific questions in the audit
request;
- Does the contractor pay its professional staff
for hours worked in excess of 40 hours per
week?
- Does the contractor record and, in turn, invoice
for hours worked by its professional staff in
excess of 40 per week?
- What is the average work week of the
contractor's professional staff? If it
exceeds 40 hours, is this factored into its
billing rate?
- Does the contractor, by company policy, require
professional employees to work in excess of your
40 hours per week and is that factored into its
billing rate?
D. INDIRECT COST RATES
1. Determine the basis of the proposed indirect cost
rates.
2. Verify proposed rates. Primary verification is a
formal agreement for Forward Pricing Rates provided
by the cognizant government audit agency.
3. If rates have not been reviewed or negotiated,
determine reasonableness of the rates from
historical rates, current experienced rates,
budgets and/or input from Regional and/or cognizant
auditors, (possibly in comparsion to negotiated
billing rate(s), if available)
4. Determine what impact, if any, the current proposal
would have upon the indirect rates proposed.
111-31
(Revised 8/90)
-------
-4-
Environmental Protection Agency
Cost Advisory Section
Review Program
Work Paper
Reference
(page ID No.)
6. Compute the impact of the recommended indirect rates on
the costs proposed.
E. OTHER DIRECT COSTS
1. Review the proposed other direct costs. Target areas
for review. If ODC's are RFP specified, no further
reveiw is required. State this in the report.
2. Verify costs (unit prices) to vendor quotes, source
documents, airline rates, etc.
3. On proposals that include RFP specified ODCs, determine
if any of the ODC items are normally included in the
contractor's indirect expense pool.
4. For consultants, obtain names of individuals. Verify the
consultant rate proposed to the signed agreement
(including the hourly rate). Determine if the proposed
rate is an experienced rate (i.e. previously billed the
government or other client) or a quoted rate. Obtain
documentary support where feasible.
F. SUBCONTRACTOR COSTS
1. Review subcontractor costs proposed in the same manner
as prime contractor.
2. Review subcontractor's proposed fee for reasonableness.
Provide a copy of the weighted guidelines form with
the Cost Advisory Report.
3. For any proposed subcontractor(s) determine the adequacy
of their accounting system, their financial capability
and CAS coverage.
4. Determine if subcontractor will allow the release
of labor and/or indirect rate information to the prime
contractor during the course of negotiations.
111-32
(Revised 8/90)
-------
-5-
Environmental Protection Agency
Cost advisory Section
Review Program
(CONSOLIDATED)
Work Paper
Reference^
(page ID No.)
G. FACILITIES CAPrEVL COST OF MKEY (FCCM)
A. If the contractor proposes facility capital cost of
money:
l) Verify the FCCM rate(s) with the cognizant government
agency. Include FCCM rates in the indirect rate table
in the report.
2) Determine that the FCCM rate is applied to the
appropriate base.
3) Recommended reduction o the profit/fee objective
by an amount equal to the amount of FCCM money
allowed, (see EPAAR 1515.970-2)
B. If the contractor does not propose facilities capital cost of
money:
1) Recommend the clause in FAR 52.215-31 which
waives the right to claim FCCM be inserted in
the contract/subcontract(s).
H. OTHER
1. Cost Accounting Standards
Determine if the contractor is subject to Cost
Accounting Standards (CAS) under FAR 30.201-1
and FAR 52.230-1. (Small business and foreign
governments are exempt from this requirement.)
A) If the contractor is subject to CAS, determine
whether the contractor is subject to full or
modified coverage.
l) If the contractor is subject to "full
coverage" (all cost accounting standards
apply), recommend the FAR clauses at
52.230-3 "cost Accounting standards" and
52.230-4 "Administration of Cost Accounting
Standards."
111-33
((Revised 8/90)
-------
-6-
Environmental Protection Agency
Cost Advisory Section
Review Program
Work Paper
Reference
Ipage ID No.)
H. OTHER
2) If the contractor is subject to "modified
coverage" (only CAS 401 and 402 apply)
recommend the FKR clauses at 52.230-5
"Disclosure and Consistency of Cost Accounting
Practices" and 52.230-4 "Administration of
Cost Accounting Standards."
3) Initially, contact the cognizant auditor
regarding the contractor's compliance or
noncompliance with CAS. Detailed
information regarding the contractor's
response to noncompliance issues are available
from the AGO.
4} Notify the requestor of any noncompliance
issues and their impact, if any, on this
procurement.
5) If the contractor is not subject to CAS,
notify the requestor of this fact.
2. Accounting System
Determine if contractor has an acceptable cost accounting
system for government contracts.
Where determination of adequacy of accounting
system cannot be made, recommend an accounting
system review audit be conducted ,possibly in
conjunction with the proposal audit, or after
submission of the first cost voucher.
111-34
(Revised 8/90)
-------
-7-
Envirconental Protection Agency
cost Advisory Section
Review Program
(CCNSQLICftlED)
Work Paper
Reference
{page ID No.)
3. Financially Capable
Determine if the contractor has the financial capability
to perform the contract.
I. AUDIT STEPS UNIQUE TO THE INDIVIDUAL COST ADVISORY OFFICE
REQUIREMENTS AND/OR THE REQUEST FOR PROCUREMENT (RFP).
CINCINNATI
(RTP)
111-35
(Revised 8/90)
-------
-8-
Ermronmental Protection Agency
Cost advisory Section
Review Program
(CCNSQLIEftTED)
Work Paper
Reference
(page ID No.)
- HEMXJUARTERS
Determine the adequacy of the proposal in reference to FAR
15.804-6 TMBLE 15-2 ("Instructions for Sutmission of a Contract
Pricing Proposal" by element of cost).*
* Difficulty may be experienced in getting an assist audit from
DCAA if the necessary detailed information is not available.
Significant changes in the total amount proposed between the
original proposal and the BAPO (usually on competitve
procurements) should be reviewed in detail to determine the
specific differences, especially in the labor rates proposed.
If significant changes have been made in the EAPO, this point
should be noted in the report as an item which should be
taken into consideration in comparison with the technical
proposal.
J. CXNCUJSICN
1. Index and cross reference work papers.
2. Cross reference the file copy of report to work papers.
3. Draft and submit report.
4. Enclose Contracting Officer Response Sheet with report.
5. include a copy of the instructions and form for
reporting the resolution of preaward audits to the
IG and EPA Management associated with DCAA assist audit
reports and request the completed forms be returned to
Chief - WCAS.
6. Prepare file.
7. Request a surmary of negotiations.
111-36
(Revised 8/90)
-------
what is the function of the Cost PoHcy and Rate Negotiation
Section (CPRNS)?
The functions of CPRNS are:
' * Contracts
when EPA is the cognizant agency, negotiate
indirect cost rates for all Federal agencies;
when EPA is not cognizant, serve as the Agency's
contact point
0 Grants
negotiate indirect cost rates and cost allocation
plans with state and local governments for all
Federal agencies where EPA is the cognizant agency
* formulate Agency policy on cost related issues and
perform special projects as requested
. ° perform quality assurance reviews of the cost
advisory functions at the three contract operation
sites,
assure quality of cost advisory for Federal
Managers Financial Integrity Act certification
assure EPA management of the quality of cost
and price analysis
- assure EPA managers that cost and price
analysis is performed consistently at each
site
0 coordinate audit responses and tracking of control
system (ATCS) reporting for Procurement and Contracts
Management Division
0 assist cost analysts and contracting officers on
indirect cost allocation and billing issues raised
by the financial status monitoring reviews of
super fund contractors
0 provide a representative for A-76 matters to
provide guidance, recommendations, information and
advice to EPA programs
( 8/90)
111-37
-------
-------
(I
IV. SF 1411 - THE COST PROPOSAL
Prior to the implementation of the FAR on April 1, 1984,
prospective EPA contractors provider! cost and pricing, data
on Optional Form (OF) 60. FAR [FAR 15.804-6] requires that
both civilian and military segments of the Federal Government
provide price proposal information on SF 1411 "Contract
Pricing Cover Sheet."
"(b)(l) Cost or pricing data shall be
submitted on Standard Form 1411 (SF 1411),
Contract Pricing Proposal Cover Sheet, unless
required to be submitted on one of the termina-
tion forms specified in Subpart 49.6. Data
supporting forward pricing rate agreements or
final indirect cost proposals shall be submitted
in a format acceptable to the contracting officer.
(2) Contract pricing proposals
submitted on SF 1411 with supporting attachments
shall be prepared to satisfy the instructions and
appropriate format of Table 15-3."
An example of SF 1411 follows:
IV-1
-------
PART 53—FORMS
53.301-1411
1
CONTRACT PRICING PROPOSAL COVER SHEET
NO.
OMB NO. fl
3090-0116 V
NOTE. Thit form .1 used in contract ictiont it cubm'ssion of cost or pricing data ii required. (Set FAR t5.804-6H>ll
!gY"NIf
7. PLACEISI AND PER
CPPf Q CP1F [J CPAF
OTHER (StHdfyl
OF CONTACT
4. TYPE OF CONTRACT ACTION CC
A. NEW CONTRACT
B. CHANGE ORDER
C. PRICE REVISION/
REDETERMINATION
o. LETTER CONTRACT
E. UNPRICED ORDER
F. OTHER ISfttUfl
6. PROPOSED COST tA*B-C>
A. COST B. PROFIT/FEE C. TOT At
$ $ $
8. (-i$t and reference ine Ideniificaiion. quantity «nd total price proposed for each contract line item. A line item cost breakdown supporting trtisrecac is re-
Quired unless otherwise specified by the Contracting Officer. tContm\n on nrurn*. and tHtn on plain pfp*r. tfntctaaiy. (/«• MUM 1 tifmlil. cuttomrrftl and eonrmcf nvmttcrttl)
QYES QNO
14
D. TOTAL PRICE E. HEF.'-
.
raiJubltJ fl
6. AUDIT OFFICE . *fl
11A. DO YOU REQUIRE GOVERN- 11
MENT CONTRACT FINANCING
TO PERFORM THIS PROPOSED r
CONTRACT? at "Ytt," complct*
/(cm 11BI <-
DVES D~° C
B. TYPE OF FINANCING U on*l
D ADVANCE 1 — 1 PROGRESS
PAYMENTS L_J PAYMENTS
^] GUARANTEED LOANS
13. IS THIS PROPOSAL CONSISTENT WITH YOUR ESTABLISHED ESTI-
MATING AND ACCOUNT INC PRACTICES ANO PROCEDURES AND
FAR PART 31 COST PRINCIPLES? (It "No." •fplfinl
QYES PNO
COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD (CASB) DATA IPutlie Ltw 91-319 at om»nN NON-
COMPLIANCE *ITM vcu" DISCLOSURE STATEMENT OR COST
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS 'III " Yn." tipiMit in proposal/
Q YES Q NO
This proposal is soc-1
li. NAME AND TITLf
i 7. SkCNATu^E
NS^ 7S40-01-1«5-9S-S
(C.AS0 OS- 1 or lit II! "Ytt. - iptcify in propOM/ ttlt attic* to u.*(eA
fufrmtr'vtf and iVdclcnntnfd to 6e adequate)
Q YES Q NO
O. IS ANY ASPECT OF THIS PROPOSAL INCONSISTENT WITH YOUR
DISCLOSED PRACTICES OR APPLICABLE COST ACCOUNTING
STANOARDS?r(f "Ytt. "upturn in fnfotatt
QYES QNO
i:\tsa •* -esuonse to in*f FP conifnci.moaitication.eic. in i«m 1 and reflects our Best estimates and/or actual costs as of jh.sdate
u->prl
16. NAME O^ FIRM
1411-101
ia; DATE of SUBMISSION
1
STANDARD FORM 1411 (10-*ll jtf
pTtscoDra By GSA ^H
r AR 14* CFR) S3.215.JU) ^|
IV-2
53-103
-------
-------
V. PRICE ANALYSIS
1. Competition
2. Commercial Items
3. Comparative Analysis
4. Decision Flowchart
-------
-------
V. PRICE ANALYSIS
The contracting officer is responsible for selecting and
using whatever price analysis techniques will insure a fai
and reasonable price. [FAR 15.805-2]
fair
Price analysis is the process of examining and evaluating
a proposed price without evaluating its separate cost elements
and proposed profit.
To do a good job of price analysis, the analyst must know
what is being bought and what it does. It always helps to
know what it looks like, how big it is and any other
properties that can help to understand the probable costs
of producing or otherwise acquiring it.
There is no substitute for an inquisitive attitude and
the application of common sense. None of the techniques
presented in and of themselves supply infallible answers.
Nonetheless, there are certain advantages to having
these techniques laid out in a logical format that complies
with the procurement laws and regulations. It is in this
context that the following methods are presented..
V-l
-------
Price Analysis Techniques
Price analysis techniques can be classified into three
broad categories...
o COMPETITION
o COMMERCIAL ITEM PURCHASES
o COMPARATIVE PRICE ANALYSIS
V-2
-------
When does competition exist?
Competition occurs when two or more offerers bid
for the same contract.
o Adequate competition occurs when
there are responsive offers
- there are responsible offerers
the bids are independently submitted
o If price competition exists, the contracting officer
shall presume it is adequate unless
the solicitation unreasonably denies known
qualified offerers from competing
- the low offerer has such a decided advantage
that it is immune from competition
there is a finding, supported by a statement
of facts and approved at a level above the
contracting officer, that the lowest price is
unreasonable
[FAR 15.804-3(b)(3)]
price competition if
A price is "based on" adequate
- it results directly from price competition
price analysis alone clearly demonstrates that
the proposed price is reasonable in comparison
with current or recent prices for the same or
substantially the same items purchased in
comparable quantities, terms and conditions
under contracts that resulted from adequate
price competition.
V-3
-------
What are the steps for price analysis based on competition?
o First determine that there is adequate competition.
If the conditions for adequate price competition
have been met, then you have made a finding of
effective price competition. This finding in and
of itself justifies the price as reasonable.
o If not, refer to other price analysis techniques.
Any determinations of adequate competition or analysis
should be thoroughly documented and filed.
What qualifies as a commercial itempurchase?
FAR [15.804-3] defines a commercial item purchase as one
in which price
o is an established catalog or market price,
o of commercial items,
o sold in substantial quantities,
o to the general public,
o and has an end use by other than the Government.
Every item must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis to
determine if it is a commercial item purchase.
V-4
-------
How can a determination be made that an item is a commercial
item purchase?
Established catalog price. A catalog price is included
in a catalog, price listf schedule, or other form regularly
maintained by the manufacturer or vendor, is either published
or otherwise available for inspection by customers, and
states prices at which sales are being or were last made to
a significant number of buyers who constitute the general
public. Those actual prices may be less than shown in the
catalog; most sellers have separate schedules of discounts
from list prices based on quantities and other factors.
Established market price. A market price is one currently
established in the usual and ordinary course of trade
between buyers and sellers free to bargain. It must be
established from sources independent of the manufacturer
or vendor.
Commercial item. A commercial item (the term includes both
supplies and services) is one of a class or kind regularly
used for other than Government purposes and sold or traded
in the course of normal operations.
SubstantiaI quantitles. Supplies are sold in substantial
quantities when the facts or circumstances support a reason-
able conclusion that the quantities regularly sold are
sufficient to constitute a real commercial market for the
item. This test is usually in terms of total quantities
sold, but it also should include the number of times the item
has been sold, and how many times a given price or price
structure has been accepted by buyers free to choose. Nominal
quantities, like models, specimens, samples, and prototype
or experimental units, cannot be considered to meet this
requirement. Services sold in substantial quantities are
those customarily provided by the company, with personnel
regularly employed, and with equipment, if any is needed,
regularly maintained either solely or principally to provide
such services.
General public. An item is sold to the general public if
it is sold to other than affiliates of the seller for end
use by other than the Government. Items sold to affiliates
of the seller and sales for end use by the Government are
not sales to the general public.
If the above conditions have been met and the price is
considered reasonable, then document the file for a
complete analysis.
V-5
-------
What arecomparative price analysis methods?
Comparative price analysis techniques rely on the use
of comparisons to some other acceptable standard. These
include
o past prices
o Government estimates
o visual analysis
V-6
-------
Is the price reasonable in comparison with past prices? ^^\
This" method requires access to price history records on
a line item basis. If a past price is being used for
comparison, be sure that the past price was fair and
reasonable and is a valid standard against which to measure
the offered price. Find out if the reasonableness of the
previous prices was established by competition, detailed
cost analysis, an engineering estimate, or market or
catalog price. If not, it may not be appropriate to apply
this method of price analysis.
Once you are satisfied that a previous price was reasonable,
the next step is to compare it with the current prices.
Price comparison techniques are the same, regardless of
whether the standard is a past price, a purchase request
estimate, or an independent estimate. Factors that might
affect the comparison include: variations in specifications,
quantities, or delivery schedules, inflation, whether it was
Government- furnished materials or not and the effect of
technological advances.
This type of comparison puts you in a position to request
explanations for price differences. If you conclude that
the past price is fair and reasonable and that any
differences are justified, document the conclusion to
justify the price analysis decision.
If not, the next question to ask is,
V-7
-------
Is the pricefair and reasonable compared to a Government
estimate?
The techniques for comparing a price with a Government
estimate are the same as for comparing with past prices.
It is necessary to establish the basis for the estimate
and determine its reliability. If a product is susceptible
to a realistic engineering estimate and that estimate has
been carefully developed after a study of drawings, physical
inspection, and reasonable projection, it may well be a
reasonable standard. If this is the case, the price
analysis is complete. Enter a memorandum in the file that
explains the basis of the analysis and conclusion.
If price reasonableness
the next question is ..
still has not been established, then
V-8
-------
Can a visual analysis justify the reasonableness of the
price?
Visual analysis is a fancy name for what could be caHed
"eyeballing." It means you can get familiar with an
object by looking at one, or a picture of one, and talking
to someone who knows how it's used. Based on this
knowledge, you may be able to come up with a dollar
figure as to its worth or value. This value becomes a
standard you can use sometimes, when looking at an offered
price, a market or catalog price, or a Government cost
estimate in making a decision to accept the offered
price or to negotiate a different price. It rarely is
sufficient by itself, but if you were almost convinced
by one or more of the previous methods, it may.be enough
to finally establish the reasonableness of the price.
V-9
-------
The aforementioned price analysis techniques are summaried
be low:
PRICE ANALYSIS DECISION FLOWCHART
Is there effective price
competition?
No
Is price reasonable
compared to market or
catalog prices?
NO
Is price reasonable
compared to past prices?
No
Is price reasonable
compared to an
independent government
estimate?
No
Does visual analysis
justify reasonableness?
NO
Obtain cost or pricing
data and perform cost
analysis
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
'Analysis
Complete
"Analysis
Complete^
"Analysis^
Complete^
Analysis'
Complete,
^Analysis
Complete
V-10
-------
-------
VI. COST ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES
1. Definition
2. Concepts
a. Should Cost
b. Cost Normalization
3. Direct Labor Analysis
a. Direct Labor - Definition
b. Determination of Direct Labor Hourly Rate
c. Salary Escalation
d. Indefinite Quantity Contracts - Problems
e. Level of Effort Contracts - Problems
4. Direct Material and ODC
a. Material
b. Interdivisional Transfers
c. Subcontract Costs
d. Consultants
e. Special Equipment
f. Travel
5. Indirect Costs
a. Computation of Rates
b. Unallowable Costs
c. Billing Rates
d. Ceiling Rates
e. Rate Agreement
-------
-------
VI. COST ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES
Cost Analysis is the review and evaluation of the
cost elements and the proposed fee/profit of:
separate
a) an offerer's or contractor's cost or pricing data end
b) the judgmental factors applied in projecting from
the data to the estimated costf in order to forn
an opinion on the degree to which the proposed costs
represent what the contract should cost, assuring
reasonable economy and efficiency. [FAR 15.801]
It is important to analyze proposed costs on cost reimbursement
type contracts in terms of their cost realism since the
Government will ultimately be liable for reimbursement of tha
contractor's actual allowable costs subject to the limitation
of cost clause.
VJith this in mind, it is important to understand the concepts
of should cost and cost normalization before proceeding to
specific cost analysis techniques.
Vl-1
-------
Should Cost
FAR 15.810 has expanded the definition of should cost;
however, this definition is more appropriate for major systems
acquisition or production. For purposes of EPA cost analysis,
the concept of "should cost" is as follows:
The objective of cost analysis is to arrive
at a realistic price. A realistic price is a
reasonable price. The judgment that a price is
reasonable is based on a cost estimate that is
attainable, an estimate of what it should cost
if the contractor operates with reasonable economy
and efficiency. That is where the term "should
cost" originated.
Should cost is a concept, not a technique. How a conclusion
is reached that the cost is reasonably attainable and reflects
the best deal under the circumstances is not important. There
is a relatively old concept in cost analysis that states one
should attempt to establish what it should, not what it will,
cost to do a job. What is important is that the method used
results in a price that is based on what it should cost in
the environment and under the conditions predicted for the
performance of the contract.
VI-2
-------
Cost Normalization
"Normalization" is a technique sometimes
cost adjustment process in an attempt to
degree of cost realism.
used within
arrive at a
the
greater
It involves the measurement of at least two offerers against
the same cost standard or baseline in circumstances where
there is no logical basis for differences in approach, or
in situations where insufficient information is provided
with proposals, leading to the establishment or common
'should have bid1 estimates by the agency.
The proper goal in both instructing offerers as to proposal
preparation and in conducting the probable cost evaluation
itself is to segregate cost factors which are 'company
unique' depending on variables resulting from dissimilar
company policies from those which are generally applicable
to all offerers and therefore subject to normalization.
Using the above definition is particularly pertinent to
our CPFF Level of Effort (LOE) type contracts:
To implement the "Should Cost" concept, it is
important to understand that if you are consider-
ing five proposals on a competitive RFP you should
determine what each of the five proposals should
cost given the individual circumstances for each
offerer.
Cost normalization techniques are appropriate to
adjust the proposals where there is no logical
basis for differences in approach or when insuf-
ficient information is provided ith the proposals.
To avoid this problem we commonly instruct the
contractors in the RFP to bid predetermined amounts
for travel, ODC's etc. If these instructions are
incorrectly followed or if they are not included in
the RFP and it is later determined that no logical
basis exists for different estimates, then an
adjustment should be made. We should also be alert
for contractors incorrectly bidding the level of
effort.
VI-3
-------
A complete cost analysis should include [FAR 15.805-3]: \
1. Verification of cost or pricing data and
evaluation of cost elements including:
(a) The necessity for and reasonableness of
proposed costs, including allowances for
contingencies;
(b) Projection of the offerer's cost trends
on the basis of current and historical
cost or pricing data;
(c) A technical appraisal of the estimated
labor, material, tooling and facilities
requirements and of the reasonableness of
scrap and spoilage factors; and
(d) The application of audited or negotiated
indirect cost rates, labor rates, and
cost of money or other factors.
2. Evaluating the effect of the offeror's current
practices on future costs. In conducting this
evaluation, the contracting officer shall ensure
that the effects of inefficient or uneconomical
past practices are not projected into the future.
In pricing production of recently developed,
complex equipment, the contracting officer should
make a trend analysis of basic labor and materials
even in periods of relative price stability.
3. Comparison of costs proposed by the offerer for
individual cost elements with:
(a) Actual costs previously incurred by the same
offeror;
(b) Previous cost estimates from the offerer or
from other offerers for the same or similar
items;
(c) Other cost estimates received in response to
the Government's request;
(d) Independent Government costs estimates by
technical personnel; and
(e) Forecasts or planned expenditures.
VI-4
-------
Verification that the offerer's cost submissions are
in accordance with the contract costs principles
and procedures in Part 31 and, when applicable, the
requirements and procedures in Part 30, Cost
Accounting Standards.
Review to determine whether any cost or pricing
data necessary to make the contractor's proposal
accurate, complete, and current have not been
either submitted or identified in writing by the
contractor. If there are such data, the contracting
officer shall attempt to obtain them and negotiate,
using them or making satisfactory allowance for the
incomplete data.
VI-5
-------
r
DIRECT LABOR ANALYSIS
The amount representing the cost of an element of direct
labor is the product of two quantities, namely the number
of man-hours of labor and the wage rate per hour of labor,
The cost analyst, then, must examine both factors in the
review of direct labor costs.
How this is done depends on:
the contractor's cost accounting system,
the contractor's estimating system,
- the requirements of the acquisition.
This section will look at techniques applicable to the
direct labor cost element of a cost proposal as well as
specific considerations for level of effort (LOE) and
fixed-rate indefinite quantity contracts.
VI-6
-------
what is direct labor cost?
o Direct labor are those hours which can be associated
with a specific job or task.
o Direct labor costs are composed of 2 elements:
the unit of time of a worker's effort
the cost to the company for that unit of effort
o The number of direct labor hours times the cost
per hour equals Direct Labor Costs.
In most cases, there is more than one worker providing effort
to the job; therefore, using an appropriate method (discussed
later) the cost of all employees who contribute to the job
is totaled to arrive at one summary amount for direct labor
costs.
VI-7
-------
How do you determine a direct labor hourly rate?
Frequently, employers maintain a record of their employees'
salaries only for the time period of the pay check or, for
the year. Since RFP's (request for proposals)
usually require direct labor costs in terms of direct
labor hours, it becomes necessary to convert the employee's
salary to its equivalent hourly rate in order to determine
the accuracy and reasonableness of the proposed direct
•labor costs. Examples of how to compute the hourly labor
rate follow:
Example
J. Smith is paid a gross monthly salary of $1,000.
Smith's hourly rate then is:
SI,000 x 12 months = $12,000 per year
Normally there are 2080 possible workhours in a year
(52 weeks x 40 hours per week)
Therefore, the Hourly Rate = $12,000/yr. = $5.77 per hr
2080 hrs/yr
Example * 2
M. Brown's salary is recorded in the contractor's
personnel and payroll records only at an annual
rate of $35,000 per year. Her hourly rate would
then be:
$35,000 -5 2080 hours = $16.83/hour
Notice in both of the examples that every potential workhour
is used (52 weeks x 40 hours) to arrive at the hourly rate,
even though some of these hours represent vacation time or
holidays. Because some employees might be paid on the basis
of more or less than 40 hours per week (8 hours per day),
the analyst should be aware of the company's policy.
VI-8
-------
Both actual work hours, vacation and holiday hours are
included in the hourly rate calculation because each hour is
then charged (classified) to either a direct effort or
indirect effort.
By recording costs this way, there is a record of the
total amount of direct and indirect costs at the end of
an accounting period.
If only the actual number of work hours is used to calculate
the hourly rate, then that hourly rate also includes the
cost of vacation and holiday time off. An illustration
follows:
Mary Brown has an annual salary of 540,000. She
has 2 weeks vacation time per year and is allowed
in holidays per year.
Her annual salary per year could be computed two ways;
#1: $40,000 - 2080 hours = $19.23/hr.
*2: 540,000 - (2080-160*) = 40,000
1920
S20.83/hr.
Note that the higher hourly rate is due to the built in cost
of vacation and holiday time. There could also be additional
hours for personal days, sick leave, etc. (see next page).
If "workable hours" are used to compute the hourly cost of
labor, then any fringe benefit costs subsequently added to
labor should be exclusive of the cost of vacation, holiday
and other non-workable hours.
*2 weeks vacation
10 holidays
equals
equals
80 hours
80 hours
160 hours
Vi-9
-------
m
* *
c o c *r o-
CC 00 TP VC CN
f-j
l-l
s:
ti
10 ||
tl
II
tl
CN II
r- n
cc n
.. n
•H II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
s
i 0!
(C >.
p. (5
•c
^i -iH
O rH
•rH O
W 31
tn
>^
(C
•c
m
^
(0
c
c
to
1-1
(C
03
3
0
,c
0
«iH
C
U-i
C
jj
c
3
C
Ł
(C
4J
CD
2
o
t-H
.C
(C
rH
•H
m
>
1C
03
^j
3
0
•c
4J
0
O
to
4J
c
3
C
u
o
<
4->
0
CD
14
•tH
T;
c
M
C
4J
t:
CP
Cn
(0
to
l-i
3
C
(0
JJ
c
VI-10
-------
How are labor rates weighted?
When several employees are proposed for one specific job
category because each will contribute only a portion
of the required direct labor hours, it becomes necessary
to calculate a representative rate for that category.
Fxample;
.The RFP estimates that 1000 hours of a senior engineer/
scientist is required. The offerer decides to propose four
of his engineer/scientists equally at 250 hours each for
that category; however, they all earn different salaries.
To arrive at a single hourly bid rate for that category, the
offeror must weigh the hourly rates of the four employees.
Hrly. wage No. of Hrs.
Engineer
Engineer
Engineer
Engineer
1
2
3
4
$12.00
$13.25
$15.00
$14.60
X
X
X
X
250
250
250
250
hrs
hr s
hrs
hrs
S 3,000
3,313
3,750
3,650
$13,713
$13,713 divided by 1000 hours = $13.71 per hour,
The computed rate of S13.71 represents the weighted average
rate of the four employees based on the ESTIMATE of each
employee providing 250 hours. If the estimated hours
change, so would the weighted hourly rate.
VI-11
-------
Note that this computation could also have been
calculated by a simple mathematical average of the
hourly rates:
$12.on
13.25
15.00
14.60
$54.85 divided by 4 employees * $13.71 per hour
Now, suppose each of the four employees are to contribute
different quantities of direct labor effort, then the
"weighted" average rate would be computed:
Hours
Hrly. Rate
Engineer 1
Engineer 2
Engineer 3
Engineer 4
200
300
150
350 .
X
X
X
X
$12.00
$13.25
$15.00
$14.60
1000 hrs.
Total Direct
Labor Cost
$ 2,400
3,975
2,250
5,110
$13,735
$13,735 divided by 1000 hours = $13.74
In this example, the weighted rate is larger because the
"mix" of the individuals' hours has changed.
Therefore, the decision to alter the distribution of labor
hours also affects the outcome of the average hourly rate.
If the proposed "mix" of direct labor hours results in a
lower average hourly rate than what is actually provided
on the contract, the potential exists for a cost overrun
a cost reimbursement contract.
on
on
When overhead, general and administrative expenses and
fee are added, the monetary difference becomes even more
significant.
Vl-12
-------
Two points to keep in mind when evaluating direct labor
tni v ?
mix:
For Fixed Rate Indefinite Quality contracts,
the offerer is motivated to weight the
average labor rate to the higher end in
order to "lock" in the rate for the period
of performance. This does not guarantee that
the proposed skill mix represented by that
hourly cost will be received during contract
performance.
For cost type contracts, the offerer is
motivated to propose the lowest rate possible
for bidding purposes and would therefore
manipulate the labor mix to reflect the lowest
possible bid rate. This of course would
make the offerer's cost proposal attractive;
however, this does not guarantee that actual
costs are going to be the proposed
costs. The contractor may have been "buying
in". (Without ceiling restrictions in the
contract, the offerer could actually provide
and be reimbursed for the higher level personnel.)
With a cost-type contract, the Government will
pay for the ACTUAL higher level personnel
subject to the limitation of cost clause, even
though the proposed and accepted direct labor
costs were based on lower paid employees.
Conclusion:
In evaluating the composition of a direct labor category
rate, determine that the appropriate method is reasonable
in light of the contracting environment, i.e., (cost or
fixed rate) for which it was computed.
VI-13
-------
what is escalation and how is it determined?
Escalation is a computed percentage rate to be applied
to the current direct labor costs or hourly direct labor
rates. The application of the percentage increases the
direct labor cost estimate. The reason for increasing a
direct labor cost is to estimate the cost of direct labor
over a period of time by estimating future increases such
as cost of living increases and promotions.
Escalation is determined by considering the factors which
influence the cost of living decisions by management and
the promotion policies and plans of the company. These
factors must be considered if a proper cost analysis is
being performed. An appropriate escalation rate is one
which best reflects the future cost of labor with
consideration to the promotion and salary policies of
the company.
Here are two situations where escalation becomes an issue.
In the first case, the proposed labor is scheduled for
promotions at various times during the contract performance
period. In the second case, the company plans on a company-
wide cost of living increase.
Example #1:
Four employees were proposed by the
contractor as follows:
Labor Emp,
Category *
Engineer 5
Engineer 3
Engineer 4
Engineer 1
Direct
Labor
Hrly. Rate
$17.90
$14.36
$15.20
$ 9.26
Proposed
Direct
Labor Hrs.
Direct
Labor Costs
ino
50
27
94
SI,790
718
410
870
271 hrs. $3,788 i 271 = S13.98/hr
VI-14
-------
m dp
r** 0
W Li JC
.H 0 fO JJ
CD
0 C Oi O
0 -i-t C JJ
^1 O> "iH C
O C > -i-i
iH K ••-(
& 0 cn c
E 0 O JC o
* QJ
•~i Li W "C
OI 0 0 *r4 CD
C O 0 (0 JJ
K C C Li U
eŁ •|~>
JC S-i C ** O
JJ O EC Li
M-l (0 &
«. Li •>
Li 0 Li 0 0
O Cu ^0 Ł* i-C
> 0 -fH JJ
0 JJ >t 0
So o **->
O (C 0 0 O
Ł Li JC Li
JJ JJ C
C O C
• O O JJ "H
0 U JJ JJ
JJ C 1C re
(0 0 -iH .H Ll
Li JC JJ
JJ 03 r-i 02
> JC 3
iH C JJ Li «H
Ll JJ C 0 rH
3 C O 0 -H
C -r< E C
JC -H C
w vc o> Li ro 0
(C m rH
07 » 0
JJ •• VO Li CC
C , .
Li Li Li
3 M-l O 0 TO
0 O ^ J= 0
JJ -*i
0 0 "C
JC 03 0 c 0
JJ -^ rH JJ fj
(0 3 C C
w LI "c -H TO
jj 0 e
C TO J^ 03 Li
0 O J= O
W Li CC JJ V->
0O C Li
iu MJ en o 0
a -n e &
0 -C
Li 0 0 C JJ 0
rH 0 rH O i-H
CO 3 >, IT] C
CT^ *C C 0 Li *C
• 0 rH W JJ 0
m jc G.---I c jc
rH O E <0 O O
•W 0^ 0 Li O 0-
*
O
c
•
>
0
z
•
JJ
o
c
O".
vc
en
c/>
cr.
VC
en
rH
>
en
vc
•
en
rH
>
'"
•
JJ
o
0
cr.
•
rj
3
<
•
iH
3
f3
0
C
3
(-3
I>
CO
Ł
•
Li
C.
*
Li
ro
Ł
•
f^
0
EL.
*
C
TO
i-:
cr.
vc
•
cr.
iH
>
gf\
VC
•
CTs
•H
to
O\
VC
•
cr.
i-H
to
a,
vc
•
cr.
rH
V5-
cr.
vc
•
cr
rH
{/>
en
vc
•
cr,
rH
to
ON
VC
«
en
i-H
to
C
en
•
P^
i-H
to-
C
en
•
i^
iH
in
Li
0
C
~Ci
c
t:
CN
CN
in
,__|
V)
CN
CN
•
m
iH
to
CN
CN
•
m
rH
t/1
CN
CN
•
m
iH
t/>
CN
CN
•
in
i-H
to
CN
CN
•
in
«H
f>
CN
CN
•
in
»— i
to
vc
m
•
^r
rH
>
VC
m
•
^t
rH
«•
VC
m
•
^*
i-H
wv
vc
m
•
^
rH
j
0
0
C
'c
C
CŁ
VC
CN
VC
^_l
vc
CN
*
VO
fH
v>
vc
CN
•
VC
r-t
to
er
CN
•
in
rH
to
c
CN
•
in
i-H
to-
C
CN
•
IT
rH
CO-
C
CN
•
in
rH
v>
c
CN
*
in
rH
to-
e
CN
*
1/1
•H
to-
C
CN
•
in
rH
V>
C
CN
•
in
rH
t/>
C
CN
•
in
rH
to
^r
Li
0
CD
C
d
c
t:
m
VC
cr.
to
m
vc
cr.
to
m
VC
•
cr.
to
m
vc
•
en
>
m
vc
*
en
VI-
n
vc
•
en
to
m
vc
•
ON
VJ
m
vc
•
en
to
m
vc
•
a.
v>
m
vc
•
cr.
to
m
vc
•
cr.
Vi-
VC
CN
•
en
to
i— i
Ll
0
0
C
*Q
C
tŁ
CC
CT<
• Li
m c
i-H M-l
Vi
0
C2, O
C
Li dj
3 E
O Li
JC o
U-l
Li Li
0 0
a a
jj MH .
05 O -»J
C (ft
CJ "D O
O 0
i-i -n
O Li Li
j2 0 O
(0 Qj-C
rH flj
JJ i-H
CD o
JC 1C 0
JJ Li J=
JJ JJ
JJ C
C Li
«G "*H
O Li O
3 JJ
C •€
J2 5*i
JJ Li
*r^ 03 (t5
i — i Q (0
3 o «
O/lt
iy
JC rH O
CC rH 0
•fH C
JJ 3
•H 1C
Li "H
- C
C JC JJ
O TO **H
•rl rH
JJ -
TO JJ 0
E 10 Li
Li JC C
O » **
M-l (p
C -U H
•H U 0
0 JC
tt rH fn
•«-l M-i
JC 0
JJ Ll •
W
C JJ JZ
C 0 -u
C C
•c o
0 « E
IR 0
(C C CN
CC -C rH
VI-15
-------
The most accurate computation of direct labor costs would
involve using the actual rate for a given month times the
number of hours estimated to be worked that month. This
would be an extremely tedious technique and not cost
beneficial for a large number of labor categories.. The
amount of money saved by being so precise is lost due to the
additional administrative costs to achieve that preciseness.
A simpler estimation method is to calculate the average
hourly rate over the period of performance and then use that
average hourly rate to arrive at the total estimated direct
labor costs. We've illustrated our point below:
Engineer 5:
Engineer 3
Engineer 4
Engineer 1
$17.90 x 2 mos.
S19.69 x 10 mos.
$14.36 x 5 mos.
$15.22 x 7 mos.
$15.20 x 9 mos,
$16.26 x 3 mos,
$9.26 x 1 mo.
$9.63 x 11 mos,
S 35.80
$196.90
$232.70 7 12 - $19.39
$ 71.80
$106.54
$178.34 7 12 = $14.86
$136.80
$ 48.78
$185.58 f 12 = $15.47
$ 9.26
$105.93
$115.19 f 12 = $9.60
The calculated rates above represent the AVERAGE hourly rate
for the ENTIRE 12-month period of performance and reflects
the forecasted promotion plans of management.
From these rates direct labor costs can be calculated by
applying the calculated direct labor hourly rates to the
estimated number of hours.
VI-16
-------
Example #2:
The offerer has determined that current labor costs for
the. contract period of performance is $114,950. This was
determined based on the current salaries; however, the
offeror is planning to award a company-wide cost of living
increase of 5% in the 4th month of the 12-month contract
performance period.
Therefore, it is necessary to project that increase in
labor cost in the offerer's labor estimate. This calculation
can be done as follows:
The 5% increase will take place in the 4th month; therefore,
8 months
12 months x 5% = 3.3% escalation
so escalated labor costs will be
5114,950 x 103.3% = $118,743
VI-17
-------
Example^ 2i
The ARC Corp. performs their salary review for each
employee on their anniversary date of hire. Historically,
salary increases have averaged 7% on an annual basis. The
proposed contract is expected to commence on January 1 and
will have a base period of one year plus two option years.
What is the acceptable labor for the base year and each of
the option years?
Answer:
In the absence of data to the contrary, it can be reasonably
assumed that salary increments will be evenly distributed
throughout the period; therefore, on the average, employees
will receive pay raises at the midpoint of performance.
Assuming this to be the case, the escalation for the first
year will be 7% x 1/2 x 5100,000 or 83,500. The acceptable
labor for the first year is $103,500 (5100,000 + 53,500).
The acceptable labor for the second would be 5110,745
(1.07 x 5103,500) and for the third year it would be
5118,497 (1.07 x 5110,745).
VI-18
-------
What basis is used to arrive at an appropriate escalation
factor?
When promotions are forecasted for direct labor employeesr
look to the past promotion practices and percentages given
by the contractor to determine if the escalation factor
is reasonable and appropriate.
Cost of living raises are tied to inflation. The basis
for granting such raises is to allow employees to maintain
the purchasing power of their current salaries because
inflation erodes the purchasing power of money. Since
the basis for granting cost of living raises should be
directly tied to inflation, it is important to be aware
of the forecasted rate of inflation, not the historical
rate of inflation.
One of the many erroneous assumptions used for proposing
cost of living increases is that the past inflation rate
is indicative of the rate and therefore
should be used as the basis for estimating future costs.
In determining a reasonable escalation rate,
don't presume that 10% rate of inflation
last year means 10% this year; this type of
rationale is what fuels the inflationary
spiral.
In evaluating an inflation rate, look at
future projections for the economy, partic-
ularly the costs of goods, services and the
cost of labor. This type of information can
be found in many of the publications put out
by data forecasting services*.
*Commonly used forecasting services:
Data Resources, Inc. (DRI)
Consumer Price Index (CPI)
Labor Forecasts from the Bureau of Labor Statistics
VI-19
-------
Another common error made in evaluating escalation is the
assumption of its permanence. Inflation characterized the
late fin's and 70 's
economic inflation
the 70 ' s. Because
people have become
prices must always
Prior to that there were periods of
but nothing like the rampant inflation of
of the long period of rising prices,
conditioned to thinking that wages and
rise, and therefore expect wage increases,
As a result of wage increases, the price of
goods and services do rise and in effect
inflation results.
One of the goals of Federal Government auditors
is to aggressively attack the direct labor salary
"creep". In periods of recession in the economy,
salary increases should reflect merit increases.
In summary, when evaluating escalation factors, consider
the following:
1) what is the company policy for salary increases?
2) What has been awarded to employees in the past?
3) What are the forecasting services predicting for
the next quarter or year?
4) what type of contract pricing arrangement is
being anticipated?
VI-20
-------
what particular problems with direct labor cost estimates
are associated with fixed rate indefinite quantity contracts?
The fixed rate indefinite quantity contract, where a labor
hour is the product unit, "locks in" a labor rate for
a specified period:
1. In circumstances where the type of labor is
readily available in the commercial market
place, a price analysis may be sufficient
to determine the reasonableness of price.
For example, guard service, custodians,
computer technicians, electricians, etc.
2. When cost analysis is necessary to determine
the reasonableness, the base labor rate
(unescalated) should be evaluated carefully
for the contractor's assumption for proposing
a fixed rate.
3. The use of category averages for calculating the
fixed rate is more appropriate than key personnel
because the use of a particular employee's
salary for determining a fixed rate implies the
availability of that employee for the duration
of contract performance.
The use of category averages as a basis for fixed
rate assures a level of labor quality availability
instead of the availability of the employee.
However, it can also result in built-in profit if
lower salaried people are provided. Therefore,
when relying on category averages-as a basis of
determining fixed rates, caution should be
exercised when there are wide variances in the
individual rates comprising the fixed rate.
VI-21
-------
What particular problems with direct labor cost estimates
are associated with CPFF - Level of Effort contracts?
The Level-of-Effort contract in EPA defines labor with
general labor classification such as:
PL-1 (Professional Level One)
TL-3 (Technical Level Three)
These labor categories do not encourage specific classifi-
cation of employees. As a consequence, a contractor may
propose a labor category rate which could be representative
of a wide range of hourly rates and skills.
When evaluating LOE labor category rates:
1. Review the experience and educational levels
as specified in the RFP's.
2. Review the disparity between the highest and
lowest hourly rate in a particular category.
3. Remember that it is to the contractor's
advantage to bid the lowest rates for award
purposes because technical quality is usually
more important than cost.
VI-2 2
-------
DIRECT MATERIALS AND ODC
What items are considered direct material costs and other
direct costs?
First let us go back to the definition of a direct cost.
"Any cost that is specifically identified with a
particular final cost objective."
In other words, any incurred cost which can be directly
associated with a contract.
Typical direct material and other direct costs includes
Direct
Materials
Subcontracted parts and components
Purchased parts
Commercial item purchases
Interdivisional transfers
Raw materials
Other
Direct
Costs
Travel
Supplies
Consultants
Xeroxing
Special Equipment
Printing and Reproduction
Freight and Postage
Telephone
VI-23
-------
How are material and other direct costs to be evaluated?
Material Costs:
o Verify the unit prices to:
vendor quotes
recent purchase orders
current supplier lists
- price lists and catalogs
o Standard commercial items should be analyzed using
price analysis techniques.
o Review the number of units for consistency with
the proposed effort.
o Verify the mathematical extensions of price x
quantity = total estimated cost.
o If all of the above steps are met and if the costs
proposed are considered fair and reasonable, then
Document the basis for acceptance of the proposed costs to
complete the review.
Vl-24
-------
Interdivisional Transfer
An interdivisional transfer is a "sale" of materials or
services between two divisions or segments of one company.
Interdivisional sales or transfers of materials should be
ordinarily handled on a costr no-profit basis to the
transferor. However, transactions involving items that are
regularly manufactured and widely sold by a contractor may
be handled on a basis that recognizes a fair profit return
if the contractor's organization is structured along profit
center lines and the transferring segment is operated as a
separate entity required to perform on a self-sufficient
basis.
When reviewing an Interdivisional transfer
o determine the basis for pricing,
o review the cost element(s) if the interdivisional
transfer has more than one cost factor,
determine whether divisional profit is included
or not and verify whether it is consistent with
the contractor's company policy and any prior
contractual agreement with the Government.
VI-25
-------
Subcontractor Costs
Subcontractor's proposals over $500,000 should be detailed
in the same format as the prime contractor. Rut for any
amount, you should obtain sufficient information from" the
prime contractor to satisfy yourself of the reasonableness
of costs.
FAR 15.805-5(1)
further....
details the cost analysis responsibilities
The prime contractor or higher tier
subcontractor is responsible for
conducting appropriate cost analyses
before awarding subcontracts. However,
the contracting officer may request
audit or field pricing support to
analyze and evaluate the proposal of a
subcontractor at any tier (notwithstanding
availability of data or analyses performed
by the prime contractor) if the contracting
officer believes that such support is
necessary to ensure reasonableness of the
total proposed price. This step may be
appropriate when, for example—
(1) There is a business relationship
between the contractor and sub-
contractor not conducive to
independence and objectivity;
(2) The contractor is a sole source and
the subcontract costs represent a
substantial part of the contract
co st;
(3) The contractor has been denied
access to the subcontractor's
records; or
(4) The contracting officer determines
that, because of factors such as the
size of the proposed subcontractor
price, audit or field pricing
support for a subcontract or sub-
contracts at any tier is critical to
a fully detailed analysis of the
prime contract proposal.
VI-26
-------
(I
(j) When the contracting officer requests the cogni-
zant AGO or auditor to review a subcontractor's
cost estimates, the request shall include, when
available, a copy of any review prepared by the
prime contractor or higher tier subcontractor,
the subcontractor's proposal, cost or pricing
data provided by the subcontractor, and the
results of the prime contractor's cost or price
analysis.
(k) .When the Government performs the subcontract
analysis, the Government shall furnish to the
prime contractor or higher tier subcontractor
reviewed, a summary of the analysis performed
in determining any unacceptable costs, by
element, included in the subcontract proposal.
If the subcontractor withholds consent, the
Government shall furnish a range of unacceptable
costs for each element in such a way as to
prevent giving away subcontractor proprietary
data.
A price analysis should be performed for all significant
proposed subcontracts.
A cost analysis should be performed on prospective sub-
contractor ( s) when cost or pricing data is required or
when the contractor is unable to perform an adequate price
analysis. (FAR 15.805-1)
REMEMBER:
The proposed subcontractor fee/profit is an element of cost
to the prime contractor? therefore, it should be evaluated
like any element of cost by applying the appropriate EPA
fee/profit guidelines.
Vl-27
-------
When evaluating consultants:
o Obtain the names of the individual consultants
and/or the consulting firms,
o Request a copy of the consultant agreement and/or
a copy of the consultant's proposal,
o Review any available information on the prior
use of the consultant,
- Is the proposed rate equal or appropriate
to the rate charged previously to the
Government or other clients.
Can the proposed number of hours realistically
be provided?
o Verify the mathematical calculation.
Document the findings for the file to complete the review
Vl-28
-------
Special Equipment
Special equipment may require technical evaluation beyond
the capacity of a cost and price analyst; therefore the
cost analyst should seek the appropriate expertise to
assist in the evaluation of the proposed costs for
specialized equipment.
After a technical analysis on the equipment has been
performed or acquired
o Inquire as to whether the equipment is
available from Government stock,
o If the equipment will be contractor-
purchased, will it be direct charged or
capitalized,
o Determine whether the proposed price is
acceptable
- Compare the price with two or more other
quotes
Perform a lease vs. buy analysis
FAR 31.205-36 discusses Rental Costs (operating
leases)
FAR 31.205-11 discusses Rental Costs (capital
leases)
FAR 31.205-2 discusses ADPE Lease Costs
o Verify mathematical extensions for accuracy.
Document the file to complete the analysis.
VI-29
-------
Travel Costs
Travel costs include such items as:
airfares meals
taxi fares lodging
rental cars mileage
o Assure yourself of the reasonableness of the
proposed travel based on the needs of the
prospective contract.
o Verify airfares to the Official Airlines
Guide (OAG).
Use the standard coach fare as a guide
for acceptance of proposed airfare
o Review ground transportation for reasonableness
and necessity.
Include corporate discounts for car rental
(usually 20%).
o Off-site subsistance must be in accordance with
company policy and at rates which are not excessive,
Also compare the rates against government travel
rates.
If the costs are determined to be reasonable, then document
the findings for the file.
VI-30
-------
In general, wher^ reviewing_other_ direct costs;
o Review the necessity of the cost to the contract.
o Are the proposed units consistent with the
contract requirements?
o Are the unit prices reasonable?
o Verify the mathematical extensions.
o Is the item a direct charge to the contract?
o DOCUMENT the findings and conclusions.
VI-31
-------
I
INDIRECT COSTS
(FAR 42.703] It is the policy under FAR that a single agency
shall be responsible for establishing indirect cost rates and
that these rates shall be binding on all agencies andTtheir
contracting officers unless otherwise prohibited by statute.
[FAR 42.703]
[EPAAR 1542.705-1] Furthermore, it is the policy of EPA for
Cost Policy and Rate Negotiation Section of P&CMD to be
responsible for negotiating final indirect cost rates in
accordance with EPA contracting officer procedures.
If a question arises regarding the appropriateness and
applicability of any indirect cost rate or its allocation
base, consult your EPA Cost Advisory Office. The staff of
accountants possess the in-depth knowledge of accounting
principles required to deal with indirect cost issues.
VI-32
-------
What is an indirect cost?
[FAR 31.203] "An indirect cost is any cost not
directly identified with a single, final cost
objective, but identified with two or more final
cost objectives or an intermediate cost objective."
I_llu_stration #1
Carl, an engineer with Clean-Up, Corporation spends
all of his working hours on 3 projects: Contract 1,
Contract 2 and Contract 3. So, Carl can attribute his
workday to a specific final cost objective the completion
of contract 1, 2, or 3.
THEREFORE, Carl's salary is a direct cost to contract 1,
2 or 3 based on the amount of time he spends on each
contract.
In contrast, Joanna's time as president of Clean-Up
Corporation is not spent on any particular contract. She
spends her time in meetings and deciding the corporation's
overall future. She could not attribute her workday to a
specific final cost objective such as a particular contract.
Her time and efforts benefit the company as a whole (several
objectives); therefore, her salary is an indirect cost.
Illustration $2
The monthly office rent of Company XYZ is 52,500. The
office space is used for all company operations, direct
and indirect. Because there are no designated usage
areas of the office, the $2,500 is considered beneficial
to all operations of the company (several final cost
objectives) and is classified as indirect.
VI-33
-------
r
Why are indirect costs referred to by many titles?
Indirect costs are generally titled:
Overhead
General and administration (G&A)
Material overhead
Subcontracting overhead
Fringe benefits
The various titles distinguish the base and pool from which
the indirect cost was derived. Note that the term "overhead"
is also used in a general sense to describe indirect costs
rather than a specific indirect cost pool as shown above.
What do the terms "base" and "pool" refer to and how are
indirect rates determined?
An indirect rate, usually expressed as a percentage,
is the result of dividing the indirect cost pool by the
appropriate allocation base for a specific accounting
period.
Indirect Cost Pool
Indirect Cost Rate - Allocation Base
An indirect cost pool is a grouping of incurred costs
identified with two or more cost objectives but not
specifically identified with any final cost objective.
The allocation base .is the grouping of incurred costs
benefited by the indirect cost pool.
VI-34
-------
Example of IndirectCost Rate Development
Total
Salaries (labor)
Fringe Benefits
Travel
Supplies
Publications
Subcontracts
Consultants Fees
Rent/Utilities
Computer Charges
Insurance
Other Costs
Total Costs
Company Cost
Direct
Costs
$1,000,000
60,000
9,000
20,000
300,000
40,000
26,000
25,000
$1,480,000
Budget
Indirect
Overhead
$275,000
400,000
5,000
4,000
136,000
10,000
40,000
$870., 000
Costs
G&A
$125,000
10,000
2,000
13,000
20,000
40,000
10,000
30,000
$250,000
For a single indirect rate structure;
Indirect Rate =
$1,120,000
$1,000,000
Indirect Rate ~ 112.0%
For a two-rate structure:
Overhead Rate = $870,000
$1,000,000
= 87%
($870,000 + $250,000)
(Direct Labor Costs)
(Overhead Costs)
(Direct Labor Costs)
G&A Rate
= $250,000
$2,350,000
- 10.6%
(G&A Costs)
(Direct Costs &
Overhead Costs)
VI-35
-------
Once a rate has been determined, it is applied to the base
used to calculate the rate.
Indirect Costs = 112% x Direct Labor Costs
Overhead Costs = 87% x Direct Labor Costs
G&A Expense
10.6% x (Direct Costs &
Overhead Costs)
VI-36
-------
what are unallowable costs?
Unallowable costs are those costs which are
expressly unallowed by the cost principles, 01
mutually agreed to be unallowable.
Unallowable costs are to be identified and excluded
from any billing, claim or proposal applicable to a
government contract [FAR 31.206]
Some common unallowable costs found in a contractor's
indirect cost proposal are:
Advertising [31.205-1]
Bad Debts [31.205-3]
Contingencies [31.205-7]
Contributions [31.205-8]
Entertainment [31.205-14]
Idle Facilities Costs [31.205-17]
Interest [31.205-20]
Lobbying [31.205.22]
Organization Costs [31.205-27]
Costs which are not considered unallowable in a
contractor's indirect cost proposal, but are often
controversial, are:
Controversial Costs
Compensation
Depreciation
Pesearch & Development
Related party transactions
Selling Costs
Rental Costs
[31.205-6]
[31.205-11]
[31.205-18]
[31.205-26{e)]
[31.205-38]
[31.205-36]
These costs are considered controversial for several
reasons:
- magnitude of the cost
basis for incurring the cost
basis for calculation of the costs
- the degree of benefit received by the Government
VI-37
-------
How is a billing rate established?
Before responding to this question, contract specialists
should be reminded that the process of reviewing and
negotiating indirect rates involves complex analysis,
(i.e. knowledge of the contractor's accounting system,
cost principles, cost accounting standards, etc.)
therefore, the negotiation of billing rates should not
be conducted without the advice of the cost analyst.
r>
When reviewing the billing rates in a contractor's
cost proposal, the cost analyst
determines the contractor's basis for proposing
the indirect cost rates
- review the assumptions made
- review the allocation base
0 verifies the proposed rates to
- the cognizant government audit agency
(usually Defense Contract Audit Agency)
- previously negotiated billing rates if
they are applicable to the same accounting
period
- budgets submitted by the contractor which
forecasts the indirect expense rates for the
contract period of performance
0 determines what impact the award of the contract
may have on the contractor's indirct expense rates
- if the potential contract award amount is
significant relative to the contractor's
other government and/or commercial sales,
the indirect expense rates may decrease and
this effect should be considered in negotiations
determines if ceiling rates should be recommended
using the guidelines of FAR 42.707 (see next page)
VI-38
-------
The cost analyst has the responsibility to review the
proposed indirect expense rates even though another
government agency has approved billing rates. If the
assumptions for which the existing billing rates were
established is valid, then the analyst may recommend
the prevailing government approved indirect expense
rates. Whatever recommendation is made, the analyst
must thoroughly document the basis of the recommendation.
VI-39
-------
When may it be appropriate to provide for a ceiling on indireclF )
cost rates beyond which the contractor will absorbthe costs?
It may be appropriate if:
(1) The proposed contractor is a new or recently
reorganized company, and there is no past
or recent record of incurred indirect costs.
(2) The proposed contractor has a recent record
of a rapidly increasing indirect cost rate
due to a declining volume of sales without
a commensurate decline in indirect expenses.
(3) The proposed contractor seeks to enhance its
competititve position in a particular
circumstance by basing its proposal on
indirect cost rates lower than those that
may reasonably be expected to occur during
contract performance, thereby causing a cost
overrun.
When any of the above situations (or a comparable
situation) is apparent, an equitable ceiling covering the
final indirect costs rates should be negotiated and specified
in the contract.
When ceiling provisions are utilized, the contract
shall also provide that (1) the Government will not be
obligated to pay any additional amount should the final
indirect cost rates exceed the negotiated ceiling rates and,
(2) in the event the final indirect cost rates are less than
the negotiated ceiling rates, the negotiated rates will be
reduced to conform with the lower rates. [FAR 42.707]
VI-40
-------
What is a negotiated indirect cost rate agreement?
On the following pages is an example of a negotiated
indirect cost rate agreement. When EPA is the cognizant
agency for a contractor's final indirect rates [FAR 42.703],
the Cost Policy and Rate Negotiation Section negotiates
the final indirect rates and issues the Agreement.
The Agreement will provide information such as:
(!) The type of rate being agreed to, whether
final indirect cost rates or interim billing
rates.
(2) The description of the rates being agreed to,
i.e., overhead, fringe benefits, etc.
(3) The effective period of the rate.
(4) The rate itself, expressed as a percentage
or dollar amount.
(i
(5) The allocation base for the rate.
(6) The list of EPA cost reimbursement type
contracts for which the rates apply. (see
Attachment A)
The agreement may also provide information on any
restrictions or ceilings which may supercede the agreement
as explained in paragraphs 3 and 4.
VI-41
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
NEGOTIATED INDIRECT COST RATE AGREEMENT
Contractor: XYZ Incorporated
Date: August 1, 19XX
1. This Agreement is entered into by and between the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and XYZ, Incorporated.
The purpose of this Agreement is to establish negotiated
indirect cost rates applicable to the EPA contracts shown
on Attachment A.
2. This Agreement is entered into in accordance with Federal
Procurement Regulations (FPR) 1-3.705 and 1-3.706.
3. Subject to the provisions listed elsewhere in this
Agreement, the rates listed below are established as
negotiated indirect cost rates, in effect for the period(s)
specified, applicable to the contracts listed on Attachment
A and are incorporated into the contracts in accordance with
FPR l-3.705(g).
Effective Period
From
To
Rate
Type
Final:
Fringe Benefits
Overhead
Overhead - Chicago
Gen. & Administrative
Basis for Application;
(a) Direct labor dollars
(b) Direct labor plus applicable fringe benefits
(c) Total costs incurred exclusive of general and
administrative expenses
7/1/81
7/1/81
7/1/81
7/1/81
6/30/82
6/30/82
6/30/82
6/30/82
13.97%
88.66%
40.91%
16.11%
Base
(a)
(b)
(b)
(c)
4. Incorporation of this rate agreement
listed on Attachment A:
in the contracts
a. Shall not change any indirect cost rate ceiling,
monetary ceiling, contract obligation, or specific
allowance or disallowance provided in the terms and
conditions of affected contracts. For those contracts
containing indirect cost rate ceilings which are less
than the rates contained in this Agreement, final and
provisional rates shall not exceed the specified
ceiling rates.
VI-42
-------
b. Is not a waiver by EPA of the Limitation of Cost
Clause or authorization for the contractor to exceed
the current estimated cost set forth in the contract,
FOR THE CONTRACTOR:
FOR THE U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY:
Signature
Signature of Contracting Officer
Vice President/Treasurer
Name and Title Name of Contracting Officer .
August 1, 19XX
Date
Date
Negotiated by: J. S. Smith
Telephone: (202) 382-1111
VI-43
-------
Attachment A
XYZr Incorporated
SCHEDULE OF EPA COST REIMBURSEMENT TYPE PRIME CONTRACTS
Contract Number
68-01'
6B-01'
68-01
68-01-
68-01
68-01
68-01
68-01
68-02
68-02
68-03
68-03
68-03
68-03
68-03
68-03
-xxxx
-xxxx
-xxxx
-xxxx
-xxxx
-xxxx
-xxxx
-xxxx
-xxxx
-xxxx
-xxxx
-xxxx
-xxxx
-xxxx
-xxxx
-xxxx
VI-44
-------
-------
VII. FEE/PROFIT ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES
1. Definition
2. EPA Policy
3. Limitations
4. Profit Objective Guidelines
5. Subcontractor Fee/Profit
6. EPA Form
-------
VII. Fee/Profit Analysis Techniques
The FAR defines proEit or fee as an element of the
potential remuneration that contractors may receive
for contract performance over and above allowable
costs.
Profit serves the function of being [FAR 15,901]...
- a potential financial reward
- a stimulant for efficient contract performance
- an attractor of best capabilities
vn-1
-------
What is EPA's policy on fee/profit determination?
EPA policy elaborates on the fe'e profit factor
[EPAAR 1515.970-1] It is the policy of the Agency to
utilize profit to attract contractors who possess talents
and skills necessary to the accomplishment of the objectives
of the EPA, and to stimulate efficient contract performance.
In negotiating profit or fee, it is necessary that all
relative factors be considered, and that fair and reasonable
amounts be negotiated which give the contractor a profit
objective commensurate with the nature of the work to be
done, the contractor's input to the total performance,
and the risk assumed by the contractor.
[EPAAR 1515.9021 Agencies are required to use the structured
approach for determining the profit or fee objective in
those acquisitions that require cost analysis.
The purpose of the structured approach is:
(1) To provide a standard method of evaluation;
(2) To ensure consideration of all relevant factors?
(3) To provide a basis for documentation and
explanation of the profit negotiation objective;
(4) To allow contractors to earn profits commensurate
with the assumption of risk;
(5) To reward contractors who provide their own
facilities, financing and personnel; and
(6) To reward contractors who undertake more
difficult work requiring higher risks.
i-2
-------
[EPAAR 1515.9-2] Contracting Officers may use other
methods than the structured approach for establishing
profit/fee objectives under the following circumstances:
(1) Architect-engineering contracts;
(2) Personal or professional service contracts;
(3) Management contracts, e.g., for maintenance
or operation of Government facilities;
(4) Termination settlements;
(5) Engineering services, labor-hour, time and
materials contracts which provide for payment
on a man-hour, man-day, or man-month basis,
and where the contribution by the contractor
constitutes the furnishing of personnel
rather than the output of an integrated
research, engineering, or manufacturing
operation;
(6) Construction contracts; and
(7) Cost-plus-award-fee contracts.
VII-3
-------
Are There Any Limitations on the Amount of Fee/Profit That
Can Be Negotiated?
[FAR 15.903(d)(l)] The contracting officer shall not"
negotiate a price or fee/profit that exceeds the following
statutory limitations imposed by 10 U.S.C. 2306(d) 41
U.S.C. 254(b).
(1) For experimental, developmental, or research
work performed under a cost-plus-fixed-fee
contract, the fee shall not exceed 15 percent
of the contract's estimated cost, excluding
fee.
(2) For architect-engineering services for public
works or utilities, the contract price or the
estimated cost and fee for production and
delivery of designs, plans, drawings, and
specifications shall not exceed 6 percent of
the estimated cost of construction of the
public work or utility, excluding fees.
(3) For other cost-plus-fixed-fee contracts, the
fee shall not exceed 10 percent of the
contract's estimated cost, excluding fee.
The limitations above shall apply also to the
maximum fees on cost-plus-incentive-fee and
cost-plus-award-fee contracts. However, the
maximum-fee limitation for a specific
cost-plus-incentive-fee or cost-plus-award-fee
contract may be waived in accordance with
Subpart 1.4.
VII-4
-------
THE THREE MAJOR SEGMENTS OF PROFIT GUIDELINES ARE:
I. COST INPUT TO TOTAL PERFORMANCE
("Above the line" elements of cost)
II. ASSUMPTION OF CONTRACT COST RISK
(Type of contract and related risk factors)
III. RECORD OF PERFORMANCE
VII-5
-------
PROFIT OBJECTIVE GUIDELINES
1%
1%
1%
8%
6%
5%
4%
2%
1%
5%
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
4%
5%
2%
15%
9%
9%
7%
5%
3%
8%
I. CONTRACTOR'S INPUT TO TOTAL PERFORMANCE;
Direct Materials
Purchases
Subcontracts
Equipment
Engineering Labor
Engineering Overhead
Manufacturing Labor
Manufacturing Overhead
Consultants
Other Direct Costs
G&A Expenses
II. CONTRACTOR'S ASSUMPTION OF CONTRACT COST RISK Q'% to 6%
III. RECORD OF CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE; -2% to
Cost efficiency
Management
Extent of contractor investment
Reliability of cost estimates
Inventive and developmental contributions
Timely performance
Small business participation
Labor surplus area participation
Extent of Government assistance
Effect of competition
SELECTED FACTORS;
Source of resources
Special technical achievement
Extraordinary delivery schedule
Competition
Extent of Government assistance
Extent of contractor's investment
Character of the contractor's business
Subcontracting
VII-6
-------
What Considerations are there for each major profit segment?
In evaluating the contractor's input to total performance,
you should consider the elements addressed in each major
segment area as discussed in detail in EPAAR 1515.970-2.
I. Cost Input to Total Performance
In assigning specific weights to each element of cost,
consideration should be given to:
o the assumption of risk should be commensurate
with the amount of profit;
o the degree of the contribution of the contractor's
own facilities, financing and personnel; and
o the difficulty of the work undertaken.
vn-7
-------
(1) Direct Materials (Purchased parts, subcontracted
items and other materials)
r>
(2)
(a) The amount of managerial and technical
effort required to obtain the materials;
(b) Whether this requires new source develop-
ment or existing source availability;
(c) How much managerial/technical expertise
is needed to administer subcontracts.
Equipment
*
(a) Refers to producing a test equipment, not
end product.
(b) The assignment of weights should reflect
whether equipment is contractor furnished
or government furnished.
(3) Labor
(a)
Consideration should be given to the quality
and level of expertise and experience of the
contractor's labor as a whole
(b) Consideration should also be given to the
amount of notable scientific talent.
(c) Remember that the manufacturing labor includes
all non-professional, secretaries, technicians
and carpenters.
(4) Overhead
(a) Evaluation should reflect the relationship of
the items in the overhead pool to the contract
performance; the closer the relationship, the
greater the weight.
(b) The contractor's accounting system does not
have to correspond to the fee/profit guideline
classification. When practicable, the
Contracting Officer should break out the
applicable sections of the indirect rate(s)
which could be classified as engineering
overhead, manufacturing overhead, and G&A
expenses and follow the appropriate evalu-
ation technique.
Vii-8
-------
(c) Once the fee/profit factors have been assigned
for a particular contractor, the weight assigned
may be used for future procurements with the
same contractor until there is a change in the
cost composition of the overhead pool or the
contract performance.
{5} Consultants
(a) The assignments of weights should reflect the
talent and skill of the consultant.
(b) The assignment of weights should also reflect
whether the consultant is substituting for
in-house personnel or whether there is a true
contribution of expertise.
(6) Other Direct Cost
(a) The analysis of these costs should be performed
in a similar manner as direct materials.
Vii-9
-------
II. Contractor*s Assumptionof Cost Risk
(1) Must consider the degree of cost responsibility
the contractor is assuming.
(2) Must consider the reliability of the cost
estimates in relationship to the task assumed.
(3) Must consider the chance of risk or failure.
The Government's intention is to shift the burden of
risk as much as possible to the contractor and then
compensate the contractor for that risk.
Therefore, consider that for a best efforts CPFF
contract would be assigned 0. As risk is assured,
the factor increases.
vn-in
-------
III. Record of Contract Performance
(!) The purpose of the fee/profit factor is to reward
or penalize for past performance and in consideration
of this the contractor would be motivated to improve
his/her performance.
(2) The assignment of this factor is judgmental.
(3) A satisfactory rating merits a 0 weight.
.{4) The factors in arriving at a performance weight
include:
cost efficiency
- management
extent of the contractor's investment
reliability of cost estimates
inventive and developmental contributions
timely performance
small business participation
labor surplus, area participation
extent of government assistance
VII-11
-------
What are the factors to consider for the evaluation of
subcontractor fee/profit?
When evaluating the fee or profit proposed by the
subcontractor, remember that the proposed subcontractor's
fee is an element of cost to the prime contractor and
should be evaluated as such.
In evaluating the subcontractor's fee, remember
0 the subcontractor's fee is an element of cost to
the prime contractor and the Federal Government;
0 the assignment of weight should reflect how much
technical effort the subcontractor is contribut-
ing to the contract;
0 the assignment of weight should reflect the nature
of the subcontractor's contribution,, i.e., labor,
materials, etc.
h
VII-12
-------
What required forms are there for the profit determination
process?
[EPAAR 1515.970-2] Contracting Officers should use EPA
Form 1900-2, Profit/Fee Objectives, in their determination
of a reasonable profit/fee.
VT-I-13
-------
PROFIT/FEE OBJECTIVES ^fc\
1. MFP ON CONTftACT MO.
3.
2. CONTRACTOR
*.
COST INPUT TO TOTAL PERFORMANCE
COST CATEGORY
1
DIRECT
MATERIALS
EQUIPMENT
ENG.
trfFG.
PURCHASES
SUBCONTRACTS
PIRECT LABOR
OVERHEAD
DIRECT LABOR
OVERHEAD -
CONSULTANTS
OTHER DIRECT COSTS
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE
: TOTAL
GOVERNMENT'S COST
OBJECTIVE
(MI
5
5
WEIGHT RANGE
t»
1% to 4fi
1% to 5%
IS to 2%
8% to 15%
6% to 9f.
5% to 9%
4% to 7%
23 to 55
1% to 3%
1
5% to sr.
ASSIGNED
*e&"r
%
S
r.
%
%
%
%
%
tfr
/*
%
%
%
«v
/•
^^^rr^^G^^-^:^-' I..-' • c:-
4. COMPOSITE PROF1T/FEE ON COST INPUT TO TOTAL PERFORMANCE (Col. (d) - Cat. (•))
5. COST RISK
S. PERFORMANCE
7. SELECTED
FACTORS
rft^ys^ ri^'i-*'" :.:;';-. 'I',-
...... /-•:,, • '-;;"."• .. " ,, • ,.-.. •....
;.sf.''^:r .''."•"'.' '••;'••-.. :^''vv^.v.:'r
0 to 6%
-2 to+2n
:" ,v:.;-:-;-: : "...-. --' [ •
•:''••:. '-"'... "-'
:•-•:".. -::-^'.--..:, • ' ••
TOTAL PROFIT/ FEE OBJECTIVES (Linmm 4 thru 7)
WEIGHTED PROFIT/ FEE
fC«i. tfa * (c»
3
*
S
P«O^lT/rEE O8JCCT1VE
r.
r. .
r«
r.
neuAMKs
•i
PBEPAREO BY (JV»m» mnd Title)
JiCNATU«E O*TE
EPA Fwm 1900.2(6.71)
VII-14
-------
REMEMBER
PROFIT/FEE IS AN AMOUNT, NOT A PERCENTAGE
Cost plus a percentage of cost is prohibited
as a pricing arrangement.
Profit/fee determinations do not include any
proposed amount for cost of money.
After the amount has been determined for
profit/fee, it is reduced by the amount of
allowable facilities capital cost of money
proposed.
vn-15
-------
-------
- FACILITIES CAPTIAL COST OF MONEY
1. Definition
2. Computation
3. History
4. EPA's Current Position
5. Contract Clauses
6. CPAF Contracts
-------
-------
VIII. FACILITIES CAPITAL COST OF MONEY
What is Cost of Money (COM)?
0 COM is an imputed cost, not ah incurred cost, determined
by applying a COM rate to facilities capital employed
in contract performance.
0 COM is a cost allowed by the cost principles. We use
CAS 414 for guidance and the form on how to compute the
cost of money.
0 The COM rate is computed, negotiated, and applied like
an indirect cost rate. The COM will appear as an element
of cost in the contractor's proposal.
VIII-1
-------
How is COM computed?
Below is the form for computing cost of money.*
FAC1UT1ES CAPITAL
COST OF HONEY FACTORS COMPUTATION
VMMCS* IWT.
maun**
WIT
FACILITIES
CAPITAL
•WET
\
S4A CXf EMSE
POOLS
•ICOIBIO
LtMlB f*art*n
coiPflMi* a« «tou»
TOtU.
UHDItTIItUTtD
eUTWlUTID
TOTAL
AOQK. •-
«.ta":«
pet «oe*
COCUMl
oai.iimi
•AH »O*
.rrss.
/////////
• * •
initinn
*(Found in CAS 414)
VIII-2
-------
CO
•C O
<1> C 4J
JJ (0 <0
us c
U OJ U
c
c
•1-1
4J 0)
c
(JJ
Ł
4-)
CO
•r-l
CO
JJ
0)
CO
CO
<Ł
r-i
(5
JJ
0
>1
^J
(0
JJ
CD
i-l
o
CD
CO
O
Ł
jj
>,
Ł
4-1
0)
CO
CO
•H
Ł
0
•1-1
• Ł
CD 3
3
i— 1 (1)
"3 JJ
> 10
"C
(1) 4J
4J (Q
c
•r-l
CO
•r4
Ł
E-
•
•c
0
Ł
JJ
CO
CO
CD
CO
JJ
0)
to
CO
rtj
•
^i
3
CO
(C
CD
g_l
*
tc
•
E
Jj
^'w
C
cc -c
(D
a c
•r-l -i-l
e
01
to
(0
cc
c
c
>l -H
,-1 4J
3 ro
« o
(C C
a> <—i
V4 i— i
E-K O
j_i
(U
JJ
CD
x;
a-
Ł-
r- 1
i— 1 «
fC CO
Ł
-------
What is the background of CAS 414 as it pertains to EPA?
Standard 414 was issued by the Board effective October,
1976. GSA added 414 to the FPR effective October, 1976.
However, GSA also issued Temporary Regulation 40 effective
the same date granting agencies the option whether to
recognize COM as an allowable cost.
EPA elected not to recognize COM, and withdrew applica-
bility of CAS 414.
In December of 1980, OFPP issued a policy letter (80-7)
providing recognition of COM but with a fee offset. This
policy letter is the basis for today's option to offset COM
against profit or fee. The policy letter by OFPP states...,
"Agencies shall ensure that contractors are
not compensated for facilities capital cost of
money both as a direct or indirect cost and in
profit or fee. Before the allowability of
facilities capital cost of money, this cost was
included in profits or fees. Therefore, profit
and fee prenegotiation objectives shall he reduced
if necessary to reflect this refinement in cost
accounting practices. This reduction may be
accomplished by means of offsets; that is, by
(i) using a dollar-for-dollar offset in the
Government's prenegotiation profit or fee objectives
or (ii) incorporating a common offset factor under
an agency's structured approach."
In May of 1981, GSA issued Temporary Regulation 61
incorporating the OFPP policy into FPR and later amended FPR
codifying the temporary regulation. This took away the
option of whether to recognize COM or not, but gave EPA the
right to offset any claimed' COM against fee or profit.
VIII-4
-------
what is EPA's current position on COM?
•(1) COM is an offset to profit.
(2) The contracting officer is responsible for assuring
that the proper notices are put into the solicitation
package and that the proper clause is included in the
contract.
(3) Every contractor is eligible to claim COM whether
the contract is subject to CAS or not. Cost of
Money is allowable under the cost principles.
(4) How the contractor responds determines whether the
COM waiver clause goes in the contract or not. It
is the contracting officer's responsibility to assure
that the proper notices are in the solicitation package
and that the proper clause is included in the contract,
- If the contractor does not propose Capital Cost of
Money, FAR clause 52.215-31 which waives the right
to claim COM should be inserted in the contract.
If the contractor requests COM, then the contracting
officer's responsibility is to not include the COM
waiver clause but to use the amount of COM proposed
as an offset to profit.
- The cost analysis report will inform the contracting
officer of whether COM has/has not been proposed.
VIII-5
-------
What is the proper clause under FAR and how does it differ
from the FPR?
Following are the COM clauses under both the FAR and FPR:
Solicitation Notice - IFPR 1-3,808-5]
Facilities Capital Post of Money
Facilities capital cost of money (see FPR §l-15.205-51(a))
will be an allowable cost under the contemplated contract but
only if the contractor specifically identifies or proposes it
in the cost proposal for the contract and elects to claim this
cost by checking the appropriate box below. If the contractor
does not specifically identify or propose facilities capital
cost of money and does not elect to claim this cost, the
contract will include the Waiver of Facilities Capital Cost of
Money clause.
/ The prospective contractor has specifically
identified or proposed facilities capital cost
of money in its cost proposal and elects to
claim this cost as an allowable cost under the
contract.
/ The prospective contractor has not specifically
identified or proposed facilities capital cost
of money in its cost proposal and elects not to
claim this cost as an allowable cost under the
contract.
Waiver of Facilities Capital Cost of Money - FPR
The contractor is aware that facilities capital cost of money
is an allowable cost but waives the right to claim it under
this contract.
{End of clause)
VIII-6
-------
Solicitation Notice - [FAR 52.215-30]
Facilities Capital Cost of Money
(a) Facilities capital cost of money will be an allowable
cost under the contemplated contract, but only if the prospec-
tive contractor elects to claim it below. If the prospective
contractor elects to claim this cost, the Waiver of Facilities
.Capital Cost of Money will be excluded from the contract. If
the prospective contractor does not elect to claim this cost,
the contract will include the Waiver of Facilities Capital Cost
of Money.
(b) By including an item of proposed allowable cost in
response to the solicitation, the prospective contractor will
be deemed to have elected to claim facilities capital cost
of money.
(End of clause)
Waiver of Facilities Capital Cost of Money - [FAR 52.215-311
If the contractor
of money as a proposed
the contractor
did not include facilities capital cost
allowable cost, it shall be deemed that
waived the right to claim it under this contract,
(End of clause)
VIII-7
-------
As was mentioned earlier, any claim by the contractor for
FCCOM is offset against fee or profit. EPAAR 1515.970-2
evaluates further:
[EPAAR 1515.970-2] EPA Structured System
(a)(l) Profit Factors. The factors set forth below
and the weighted ranges listed after each factor shall be
used in all instances where the profit is to be specifically
negotiated.
(2) The Contracting officer shall first measure the
"Contractor's Input to Total Performance" by the assignment
of a profit percentage within the designated weight ranges
to each element of contract cost recognized by the Contracting
Officer. Such costs are multiplied by the specific percentages
to arrive at specific dollar profits. The amount calculated
forfacilitiescapital cost of money shall not be included as
part of the cost basefor computation of profit or fee. A
complete discussion of how facilities capital cost of money
is determined and how it is applied and administered is set
forth in FAR 31.205-10.
(3) After computing a total dollar profit for the
Contractor's Input to Total Performance, the Contracting
Officer shall calculate the specific profit dollars assigned
for cost risk and performance. This is accomplished by multi-
plying the total Government cost objective, exclusive of any
facilities capital cost of money, by the specific weight
assigned to cost risk and performance. The Contracting Officer
shall then determine the profit or fee objective by adding the
total profit dollars for the Contractor's Input to Total
Performance to the specific dollar profits assigned to cost
risk and performance. The profit of fee objective shall then
be reduced by an amount equal to the amount of facilities
capital cost of money allowed. EPA Form 1900-2 shall be used
to facilitate the calculation of this profit or fee objective.
i)
VIII-8
-------
How is the offset determined on a CPAF contract?
The proposed revision to EPAAR 1515.903, Contract^inc^ J3f f i ce r
Responsibilities, reads as follows:
"(b) When facilities capital cost of money is
included as an item of cost in the Contractor's
proposal, the Contracting Officer shall reduce
the profit or fee objective by an amount equal
to the amount of facilities capital cost of
money allowed. For cost-plus-award-fee contracts,
the Contracting Officer will make the reduction
in the combined base and award pool amount."
When final rule on the revision is published, the Cost Analysis
Guide will be revised to incorporate the complete revision to
EPAAR 1515.903.
VIII-9
-------
In summary, when cost of money is proposed, your decision
will be based on the following:
Facilities Capital Cost of Money
Is Cost of Money proposed
as an element of cost?
NO
Insert Waiver Clause
_at FPP 1-3.808-5
or
FAR 52.215-31
YES
1. Do not use waiver clause
2. Determine amount proposed
3. Offset COM proposed dollar-for-dollar against
profit in making Weighted Guidelines computation
viii-in
H
-------
IX. FAIR AND REASONABLE
The total cost of a contract is the sum of the allowable
direct and indirect costs allocable to the contractf incurred
or to be incurred, less any allocable credits, plus any
allocable cost of money pursuant to 31.205-10. [FAR 31.201-1)
A cost is considered allowable if it:
(1) Is reasonable
(2) Is allocable
(3) Meets the standards of generally accepted
accounting principles and practices
(4) Is within the terms of the contract
(5) Is within the limitations of FAR Part 31
Of the conditions set forth above, reasonableness has
the broadest range of interpretation and it is this topic
which will be discussed in this section.
IX-1
-------
r
Under the "general" cost principle for reasonableness
[FAR 31-201-3], the following is given as an overall
definition of "reasonableness":
"A cost is reasonable if, in its nature and
amount, it does not -exceed that which would
be incurred by a prudent person in the conduct
of competitive business. Reasonableness of
specific costs must be examined with particular
care in connection with firms or their separate
divisions that may not be subject to effective
competitive restraints. What is reasonable
depends upon a variety of considerations and
circumstances involving both the nature and
amount of the cost in question. In determining
the reasonableness of a specific cost, the
contracting officer shall consider:
(a) Whether it is the type of cost
generally recognized as ordinary
and necessary for the conduct of
the contractor's business or the
contract performance;
(b) The restraints or requirements
imposed by such factors as
generally accepted sound business
practices, arm's-length bargaining,
Federal and State laws and regula-
tions, and contract terms and
specifications;
(c) The action that a prudent business
person, considering responsibilities
to the owners of the business, em-
ployees, customers, the Government,
and the public at large, would take
under the circumstances; and
(d) Any significant deviations from
the established practices of the
contractor that may unjustifiably
increase the contract costs.
IX-2
-------
The above quotation does not clearly define the criteria
for cost allowability based on reasonableness. What it does
indicate is that the nature and the amount must both be
considered in the context of the particular circumstances
surrounding the cost.
The FAR describes four areas to consider when determing
reasonableness.
First, the cost principle indicates that it should be
determined whether "the cost is of a type generally recognized
as ordinary and necessary for the conduct of the contractor's
business or the performance of the contract." \f
Second, the cost principle .dictates consideration of
"restraints or requirements imposed by such factors as
generally accepted sound business practices, arm's length
bargaining, Federal and State laws and regulations, and
contract terms and specifications...." 2/
Third, the contractor's action in incurring a cost is to be
compared with "the action that a prudent businessman would
take in the circumstances, considering the responsibilities
to the owners of the business, the employees, the customers,
the Government and the public at large...." _3/
Fourth, the cost principle directs the consideration of
significant "deviations from the established practices of
the contractor which may unjustifiably increase the contract
costs..." 4/
V FAR 31.201-3(a)
2/ FAR 31.201-3(b)
3/ FAR 31.201-3(c)
4/ FAR 31.201-3(d)
IX-3
-------
What factors should be considered in assessing the nature
of a cost?
o Examine whether there was a valid basis for
incurring the cost to obtain the desired end.
normal business objectives alone are not
a sufficient basis
o Examine whether the cost is within Government
contract policies (i.e., cost principles).
What factors should be considered in assessing a reasonable
amount?
o Assess whether the benefit derived from the cost
is commensurate with the amount expended by
comparing
- the costs of other contractors in the
industry
the cost of other contractors in the same
geographical area
- the contractor's cost in prior years
the costs of other vendors of the same
product or service.
o When comparing a particular cost, make sure the
comparison is VALID.
o When challenging the reasonableness of an amount
of the contractor's cost, the Government cannot
rely upon an abstract number or percentage, but
must demonstrate in what way the cost is excessive.
IX-4
-------
IX. FAIR AND REASONABLE
1. Definition
2. Main Factors to Consider
3. Other Considerations
-------
-------
ABSCA 12292, 10 G.C.
-------
It is recognized that the amount of an expense
will vary as circumstances change. Usually high
costs may be necessary where urgency is present or
where no alternative sources are available. Indeed,
there are innumerable events and conditions which
could justify the expenditure of greater amounts.
Accordingly, any examination of the reasonableness
of the amount of a cost must examine the particular
circumstances that prevailed. Absent that examina-
tion, there is little basis for questioning the
reasonableness of amounts that were expended." I/
I/ Melvin Rishe, Government Contract Costs (Washington
DC:Federal Publications, Inc., First Ed. 1984), p. 10-7.
IX-6
-------
What other considerations are there in determining a fair
and reasonable amount?
When contractors incur an ordinary and necessary
business cost, the Government generally has t"he
burden of demonstrating why the cost is not
reasonable. Moreover, if a cost is ordinary and
necessary, the Government is generally on notice
of the cost. The Government has some responsibility
to challenge a cost before it is incurred.
Costs which may be attributable to mistakes and
oversights can be considered reasonable as being
ordinary and necessary business costs. The
rationale being that some mistakes in business
are unanticipated or unavoidable, and to disallow
such costs would unjustly punish a contractor.
(See General Dynamics Corp., ABSCA 5166, et. al.,
2 G.C. 11247, 60-1 BCA 112556)
obvious, frequent mistakes may be considered
unreasonable
The existence of an established practice places
the Government on notice of the cost and failure
to object to the cost's incurrence implies
approval.
- While the existence of an established cost
practice does not ensure the reasonableness
of a cost, and the absence of an established
practice does not indicate a cost's unreason-
ableness, where a practice does exist,
contractor deviations from the practice may
make the costs highly suspect. This can be
seen in Aro, Inc., ASBCA 13623, et al., 69-2
BCA 117868. The contractor in this case had
granted administrative leave to four employees
to enable them to compete in a golf tournament.
These costs were then claimed as employee
fringe benefit costs allocable to Government
contracts. It was found, however, that the
contractor's administrative leave policy did
not list this situation as one for which
employee leave was permissible. Therefore, the
costs were disallowed as having been unreason-
ably incurred.
IX-7
-------
o When costs are incurred pursuant to an established
practice, the reasonableness of the cost will be
judged according to
the overall reasonableness of the practice
the particular circumstances attendant to
the cost incurrence
o If the Government contests reasonableness, it has
the burden of proof of justifying its position.
The above is not a complete list of considerations in a
fair and reasonableness determination; however, it should
highlight some of the more frequent occurrences.
For further guidance on this issue, consult your cost
advisory section and/or legal counsel.
IX-8
-------
X. THE IMPORTANCE OF DOCUMENTATION
A thorough cost or price analysis is not complete without
written documentation of the steps performed and the
conclusions reached.
A written record provides:
the basis for the conclusions reached
and the basis for the prenegotiation plan
a permanent record for future reference
THEREFORE, support your cost or price analysis conclusions
with WRITTEN DOCUMENTATION to the files.
X-l
-------
What is considered adequate documentation?
Adequate documentation tells
o How
o When
o Why
o Who
of a cost or price analysis decision.
HOW was the analysis performed?
desk review
assist audit
cost analysis
- price analysis
- item by item or selected review
WHEN was the review conducted and was assistance requested?
WHY was"the selected information used or not used in the
analysis; and why were the decisions accepted which
are the basis for the conclusions reached?
WHO was contacted as a knowledgeable source to verify
information in the cost/price proposal (note: name,
job title, day, time, etc.)?
Documentation is not limited to providing the answers
to these questions. Documentation should include all the
information necessary for someone else to understand the
basis of the conclusions reached.
X-2
-------
fl
XT. EPA FINANCIAL ANALYSIS SECTION
Functions
f-
- Financial tfonitoring
- contractor Purchasing System Reviews (GPRS)
- Final Audits
- Ad Hoc Contract Management Assistance
- Audit Resolution Coordination for PCMD
Review results will lead to:
- Increased compliance with Contract
- Improvements to contractor Accounting and Purchasing Systems
- Basis for improved Contract Policies and Procedures
- Timely Audit Resolution
- Final Settlement of Contract Costs
- Reduce Contract Costs
- Inproved Management of EPA Contracts
XT
(8/90)
-------
f)
-------
FINANCIAL MUEIORING
Contracts Greater than Five Million Dollars
Financial MDnitoring is a review of contractor billings to ensure
compliance with contract requirements and to ensure billed costs are
adequately supported by appropriate systems and records.
We analyze the systems and contract costs incurred to date, and based
on this analysis make determinations about incurred and future costs.
To be eligible for review, EPA established a contract value threshold
of $5,000,000 (potential cost and fee assuming all options are exercised)
for active cost price contracts. This guide is oriented towards reviews
of cost-type contracts valued in excess of five million dollars.
The financial monitoring review is not an incurred cost audit. It is
not the objective of this review to determine the allowability of costs
incurred. An incurred cost audit will be performed based on a separate
interim direct cost audit requested after completion of the financial
monitoring review.
Financial monitoring reviews should be scheduled for each appropriate
contract after at least 6 months of performance has been completed.
Reviews should be scheduled with the objective of reviewing each
contract at least once every two years of performance thereafter.
XJ-1
(8/90)
-------
-------
BACKGROUND DATA FOR POST AWARD AUDIT
CONTRACT BRIEF
ASSGN. NO.
Number:
RFP Number:
Contractor's Name/Phone #: ,
Contractor's Address: _ . ___
Contractor's Contact:
Contract Adm. /Special 1st:
(Include Phone Nos.)
Program Hgr.'s Name & No.: '
Pro j . Officer's Name & No.: __
.._ _
Off.'s Name & No:
Performance Period:
Eff. Date of Contract: ;
Basic Contract:
Dot i ons:
Type of Contract:
of CAS Coverage:
a} Ful1 or Modified
(b) N/A. Small Bus. Concern
E-i
-------
BACKGROUND DATA FOR POST AWARD AUDIT
CONTRACT BRIEF
Contract Amount w/mods.:
Base Amount:
Option Amounts:
Total Contract:
Type of Services:
Qth.er_.Pe.rtj^nen t__ Con tractT. SJTJPS.
(1) Any Pre-Contract Costs Allowed? Advanced Agreements?
(2) Any Related Party Affiliations?
(3) Did the Prime Contractor certify to Cost or Pricina Data?
(4) Any special Public Voucher terms?
I I.SUBCONTRACTORS:
Approved/Authorized
Subcontractors
Participation
* Amount '/.
Subcontractor(s) Regu i.r_ed _.to
Provide
Certificate
of Current
Submit Cost or Pricing
Progress Reports Data to Prime
Applicable Contract Clause
(1) Subcontracts:
E-l
Pane 2
-------
BACKGROUND DATA FOR POST AWARD AUDIT
CONTRACT BRIEF
Applicable Contract Clause
Costs:
(3) Direct Labor:
(a) LOE
(b> Key Personnel
(c)
(d)
(4) Other Direct Costs
a) Consultants
(b* Overtime
(c) Equipment
(d) Printing
(e) Travel
(f )
(a
E-l
Paae 3
-------
BACKGROUND DATA FOR POST AWARD AUDIT
CONTRACT BRIEF
Applicable Contract Clause
(8) Other Items:
E-l
Pace 4
-------
CT7ELINE FOR PRE-REVIEW DISCUSSION WTffi THE CO/PO
FINANCIAL 10JITGRING REVIEW
COOTRACTOR
CONTRACT NUMBER
PURPOSE OF REVIEW:
PRELIMINARY STEPS
A Financial MDnitoring Review of contracts over
$5 million to determine if the contractor is billing
actual costs incurred IAW the contract specifications.
1. Inform the contractor of our review
2. Prepare and engagement letter
3. Hold and entrance conference with
i. EPA Contracts Personnel
ii. Subject contractor
AUDIT STEPS
1. Review contract files
i. contract
ii. Modifications
iii. Summary of Negotiations
iv. BAFO
v. Technical Evaluation
vi. Pre-award Cost Advisory Reports
2. Review Monthly Reports
i. Financial Management
ii. Progress Reports
iii. Current Status
3. Review of Internal Controls
4. Review and Analyze the Billing System
5. Review Direct Costs
i. Direct Labor
ii. Subcontract Costs
iii. Other Direct Costs
6. Review Indirect Costs
i. Trace Pool and Base Costs to Books
ii. Verify ceiling, if applicable
7. Review Contractor's Management of the Contract
i. Evaluate variances between Budget vs. Actual
ii. Cost-to-Complete Estimates
8. Summarize results of our review
i. Summarize wor]
-------
-------
war
LJ5EMD
* - PRIORITY REVIEW
E - ERCS only .
A - ARCS only
Signature and Date
SECTION CHIEF APPROVAL
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS SECTION
FINANCIAL FIQNITQRING REVIEW PROGRAM
CONTRACTOR NAME
CONTRACT' «
CONTRACT PROGRAM (ARCS, ERCS, TES and etc.)
AUDIT ASSIGNMENT tt _ _. _ _..._
AUDITORS 3)
AUDIT OBJECTIVE?
I ^ Review the Contract File including specific: contract terms „ prepare a
contract, brief, preaward notes, technical and BAFO proposal.
II.
III.
I",
VI,
'"'II
Perform Preliminary Review Steps by reviewing the monthly progress
reports, financial management reports and the contractor's financial
statements. Determine if the contractor had or will have a CPSR and A
F r o p e r t y / E a u i p AI e n t Compliance R e view ,
Review contractors intern?.! controls to determine the amount of sub-
stantive testi.no necessary to render an opinion on the billing systeis.
Review of Billing and Accountino Systems.
A. Review con tractor s billing system to determine if public vouchers
e accurate, complete and timely as required by the contract.:
B. Review contractors cost accounting system to determine if it is
s u 'f f i c i >"•:•; n t t o a t: c u r a t e 1 y = e cj r o a a t e , a c c u m u 1 a t e and r e p o r t, i: h v
c o n t r a c t o r ' s a c t u a 1 c o s t s i n c u. r r e d .
Review direct costs charoed to the contract to determine if they
are allowable, allocable. and reasonable, (i.e. labor, subs and ODC's)
Review indirect, costs to determine if they are properly allocated
to the contract (i.e, Overhead and O&A)
Review the contractor's management of the contract,
A. Review established reports (monthly progress reports, public
vouchers, etc.) to determine if they adequately provide all dita
relevant to the review of financial progress under the contract.
B. Review contractor's cost-to complete estimates
C. Review cost- to-complete estimate analysis of remaining work to be
performed and determine how uncommitted costs and remaining labor
h o u r s a r e «n o n i t o r e d .
D ., Evaluate variances between budget and actual performance.
Ł„ Ensure the contractor has adequate written policies and procedures
•!• .-. ,u c: --. 1 ? f o v r. ..v -. n >': "• f : 1 '• •• '• r •" s ' r " t v" c* e t "i i" -i t w *" r« f ('" •"• ^ '!' ^ ^ "'' " n • Vj n 1. »•••) •!•. i. •"'; T< .
-------
Paoe 2
VIII. Summarize results and recoannend improvements to contract financial
progress.
IX. Draft and Issue the financial monitoring report.
X. Draft specific requests for an interim audit.
XI.. Plan for Follow-Up review.
XII. Follow-up response to advisory report.
-------
UI/P AUDITOR'S
REF INITIALS DATE
I. Background Review
1 <, Review Contract Files
a. Name of Contractor
b. Address of contractor
c. TeleDhone No. and Person of Contract
d. Type of Contract
e. Contract Term and Option Period ($)
f. Contractor's CAS coverage
a. Is contractor a small business
h. Determine if contractor certified
to cost or pricing data
2. Review the Preaward Audit Reports
s. Cost Advisory Reports
b. DCAA Audit Reports
Review the Preaward Audit and Cost
Advisory Reports to determine if the
contractor's accounting system is
adequate and the system is reliable.
3. Review the BAFO
4. Review the Technical Evaluation
5. Review the Summary of Negotiations
6, Review the Award/Contract
Review for specific and/or pertinent
clauses that may have a significant impact
on the contract.
7. Prepare A summary of the contract
modifications
* 8. Determine if there? are ore-con tract costs
and if so, if there is an advance
agreement
?. For HODS with Cost Impacts such as
Novation Agreements, Indirect Cost
Changes, Reorganizations, Accounting
System Changes, Pre-Contract Costs, etc.,
verify whether;
A. The contractor provided adequate cost
impact analysis
B., There was timely negotiation before
costs were actually incurred
-------
W/P
5'EF
AUDITOR'S
INITIALS-.
DATE
Page 4
.10, Discuss the contract with the Project
Officer (those aspects for which he/she
is responsible)
a. Obtain any ideas or issues of
concern to him/her and add audit steps
as necessary.
b. Discuss prior auditor's findings with
comments on how they may best be
resolved
c. Discuss budget, monthly progress
report, financial status report,
estimates to complete suspensions
and/or disallowances, transfers or
deobligations and transfers
11. Obtain a Dun & Bradstreet Report,
Identify and evaluate all related party
affiliations.
Obtain copies of cognizant auditor's
(DCAA, DHHS, DOE, etc.) reports on areas
such as:
a. Accounting System Reviews
b. Estimating System Reviews
c. Procurement System Reviews
d. Cost Accounting System (CAS) Compliance
Reviews
9. Floorchecks (Time Reporting Reviews?
f. Final and Interim'cost audits
13. Review EPA files/discuss with soecialist
other relevent issues including:
a. Previous Financial Monitoring
b. Indirect Cost Rate Agreements
c. CPSR Reviews
d. Property Reviews
e. Conflict of Interest Reviews
Reoorts
Send engagement letter requesting
information from the contractor
Hold Entrance conference with the
Contracting Officer and Contract
Specialist.
Obtain a list of their concerns and add
audit steps as necessary.
-------
wVP
REF
AUDITOR ';
INITIALS
DATE
II, P re1i mi n ar y Review S teps
1. Review the following report;;:
a. Monthly Reports
b, Quarterly Reports
c. Interim Reports
d. Financial/Contract Management Reports
e. Individual Work Assignment/Delivery
Order Status Reports
f. Actual Costs Incurred on Contract
compared to Budgeted Costs
'.:!,. Executive Summary Report
h. Regional Summary Report
2. Determine if the contractor had or will
have a Contract Purchasing System Review
by EPA or DCAA: determine if approved.
3, Determine if the Contractor had or will
have a Property/Equipment Compliance
Review and obtain copy of most recant
report
4. Review Prior Financial itonitorina Reports
"5, Discuss contractor issues with Financial
A d fli i n i s t r a t i v e Con tr a ct i na Of f i eer (F AC 0).
6. Be aware of evidence of Conflict of
Interest
A, Review list of all clients
B. Determine if the contractor is working
for s e v e r a 1 c u st o me r s si mu11 a n e ou s1v
C. Review Dun & Bradstreet Reports for
affiliates.
7, Prepare the Audit Program based on
Preliminary review to highlight
significant review areas and steps
planned.
8., Obtain Section Chief approval of audit
review program.
-------
W/P AUDITOR'S ,
REE INITIALS DATE Page 6
HI. Review of Internal Controls
* 1. Obtain a copy of most recent Certified
Financial Statements;
a. Review CPA's opinion.
b. Alert C,0. to adverse changes
in contractor's financial position.
c. Determine if CPA commented on
internal controls.
* 2, Review EPA and DCAA audit reports to
determine what reliance can be placed
on the contractor's internal controls,
3,. Determine if the contractor has
established procedures to safequard its
assets, and check the accuracy and
reliability of its accountinq data.
4. Review contractor's written policies
and procedures
A. Timekeeping
8., Travel
C. Subcontracting
3. Review pertinent Internal Audit Reports
-------
W/P
REF
AUDITOR'S
INITIALS
DATE
Paoe 7
Review of Billina and Accounting System
1. Compare bills to contract
terms/ conditions
a. Determine if bills exceed any
Contract Ceilings (i.e. Labor rates,
QDC's. Overhead. G&A and Fees)
b. Determine compliance with Hu.lti.ole
appropriation/account requirement*
c. Determine if Compliance with
invoicing provisions
2. Obtain copies of contractor's bill;
(Public Vouchers)
a. Summarize all bills by cost element
b. Determine how frequently bills are
submitted
c. Determine if fees are charged at
contractual rates and applied to
correct cost base
3. Trace billings to contractor's
accounting records
4. Determine if Contractor's accounting
system is sufficient to accumulate,,
segregate and report the contractor's
actual costs incurred for the contract
in total as well as by UA or DO
5. Review Journal Entries to determine if
cost is being transferred between
contracts, work assignments, delivery-
orders, etc. If so, determine why?
6. Determine what procedures are used to
monitor when 75?: of the contract
ceiling has been reached.
Determine if there is an established
system to correctly accumulate and bill
site specific costs in accordance with
contract requirements.
-------
W/P AUDITOR'S
REF INITIALS... DATE. Paae 8
IV, Review of Billing and Accounting System
(continued)
3. Determine if costs are being charged to
the correct W/A or D/0
A. Check for authorization of
expenditures billed and oroof in
file
B- Review system to determine
capability of identifying
charges by U/A or D/0
C. Review the actual start date of
charges to WAs or D/Os compared to
Effective dates per contract
?. Determine (from Billirtqs, P.O. Comments,
or Questions to Contractor) whether there
is or whether there has been a history of
suspended or disallowed billinos and
current status.
10. Compare billed costs to estimated
contract costs to determine
a. Whether there may be excess funds
that could be deobliqated or
transferred from one cost element
to another
b. Whether the contractor has or may
overrun the contract
c. Compute dollar values
-------
REF
AUDITOR'S
INITIALS
DATE
Facie 9
Review of Direct Contract Costs.
A. Review of Labor Charaes*
1. Obtain and review copy of contractor's
written time reporting policy,
2, Is the time reoortinq function
separated from the personnel and
payroll functions?
a. Who fills out the time sheet?
b. Who signs the time sheet?
c. Who approves time charged
d. Does time sheet contain the detail
, necessary to allocate the labor
costs to A contract, a work site,
and multiple appropriations
accounts .
3. For several months of
direct labor costs to
and time sheets,.
bills, trace all
payroll records
a. Determine if labor charges are
properly supported.
b. Determine if all labor charges are
allowable, allocable, and
reasonable.
c. Determine if the labor charaes were
on the contract.
categories were
clean-up tech as
for work performed
d. Determine if labor
cross charged (i.e
a chemist) .
e. Determine if cross charging has any
dollar impact on the contract.
f. Verify that employees charged meet
educational and experience
requirements for categories charged.
Compare time records to key personnel
clause in contract. Make sure key
personnel are being used to perform
as required by contract.
Review overtime charaes to determine if
they are allowable under the contract
a. Determine contractor's written
policy for authorizing overtime
-------
W/P AUDITOR'S
INITIALS,. DATE Pane 10
V. Review of Direct Contract Costs
A. Review of Labor Charges (continued)
?>., b. Determine if the overtime charged •
on the sample of time sheets was
properly authorized.
c'. Determine whether unpaid overtime
is regularly worked and how it is
accounted for.
6, Determine the contractor's actual wage
experience
a. Obtain copies of any written
policies
b. Based on the contractor's written
or verbal DO! icy, and available
i n f o r ma t i on , c om pu te t he
contractor's wage escalation and
to proposed values*
7, Determine whether management effort is
being charoed consistently with the
BAFO (Direct or indirect and function*
title, and Quantity of hours charged)
8., Determine that Direct labor charaes are
for employees rather than consultants
or sub-contractors
9. If LOE type contract, determine actual
LOE and compare to contract to see if
fee adjustment is applicable. Assure
that contractor is computing and
reporting actual LOE correctly.
10. Test whether the contractor is
performing unauthorized work
A. Test timing of work performed is
covered by Period of Performance
B. Be alert to services provided
which are properly authorized in
the Statement of Work
If it appears that the work was
not authorized by the contracting
officer, try to determine if it was
authorized by someone else.
-------
W/P
REF
AUDITOR'S
INITIALS
DATE
Psae 11
B. Review of Subcontractor's Caste
Review contract file' and
subcontractors.
list
Obtain a cooy of the contractor's
written Subcontracting procedures,
a. Does the Prime monitor the
performance of the subcontractor
b. Does the Prime require progress
reports of the subcontractor
c. Did the subcontractor provide a
Certificate of Current Cost or
Pricing Data to the Prime
d. Determine if the Subcontract Plan
is included in the contract as
required by FAR, flake a Copy for
the audit file.
Determine the actual dollar
participation of each subcontractor.
Cornea re the inception to date
experience with the contractual
limitations.
* 4. Determine whether subcontractors have
been properly approved or appropriate
notifications have been made in
accordance with the terms of the
contract.
# 5, Verify that any indirect costs or
profit/fee allocated by the prime
contractor to subcontractor costs is
allocable and in accordance with
contract provisions.
"* 6. Determine whether the prime contractor
procedures for determination of
accurate and reasonable subcontractor
accounting systems and billings are
adequate and routinely followed.
Review the subcontractor's billinas
(invoices) to determine if they are
adequate in detail to monitor.''identify
a. any ceiling costs (ODC etc.)
b. Indirect rates
c. Specific cost elements (D/L. etc,)
d. LOE data
-------
W/P
BEF
AUDITOR'S
INITIALS
DATE
Paoe 12
3. Does the contractor (if larqe business)
submit invoices for payment before
paying its own subcontractors?
a. Quantify, if applicable
b. Calculate lost interest
•:. Have Contractor provide schedules
which indicate the date costs were
i. Pilled by prime to EPA
ii. Paid by prime to subcontractor
iii* Paid by EPA to prime contractor
* 9. Are subcontractor's applied indirect
rates acceptable?
10, Determine how any fixed laboratory
rates are established for
subcon tractors.
-------
W/P
REF
AUDITOR'S
INITIALS
DATE
13
C, Review of Other Direct Costs
Review contract file to determine if
there are any contractual ceilings
placed on the ODC's. Determine
cumulative amounts invoiced bv cost
element.
* 2. Trace sample of the QDC billings to the
contractors accounts payable records
and invoices.
a. Determine if all QDCs are actual.
necessary and reasonable.
b. Determine if any expenses that
should have been charged indirectly
were charged as QDC expenses.
c. Determine if any contractual
ceilings have been exceeded or are
likely to be exceeded before
completion of the contract,
* 3, Trace a =amDie of travel vouchers
a« Obtain copy of contractor's written
travel procedures.
b. Determine if the sample travel
expenses reviewed comply with
contractual limitations, the
.contractor's written policies and
the GTR.
* 3. Determine whether subcontractor fee has
been billed in accordance with the
contract.
* 5. Review direct purchases of supplies,
materials, equipment, etc. to determine
whether property has been purchased and
properly approved under the contract.
* 6. Determine if computer charges are
billed at actual rates: if not, are
the estimated rates adjusted to
actuals. If so, How and when9 Are
over/under absorbed costs allocated
•to cost ob.iectives properiy?
Have the contractor provide
su.pportinq data for all formulas and
adjustments made,.
-------
?:EF
AUDITOR'S
INITIALS
DATE
Paoe
* 7
Review Equipment Usage/Rental rates and
determine how the costs *re priced?
Obtain adequate support from the
contractor, IAW FASB 13. does the
contractor get title to any property.
If so, when, and is the title obtained
after the government pays for the
property?
A. Review Leases for Purchase Credits
B. Determine if Government holds title
Determine if Consultants provide
evidence of the nature and extent of
services offered.
A 9, Laboratory Analysis.
A. Determine how the fixed laboratory
rates are established and how we can
assure that labor involved with the
lab services is not billed as Direct
Labor,
B. For Lab analysis costs based on the
contractor's own catalog prices,*
determine if:
(a) the cataloa has been approved
for use.
tb) the contractor bills from the
catalog .
•' c ) the billed prices are burdened
with G&A or fee. If so.
question the G&A and fee.
A 10. Pollution Liability Insurance
Soecific contractors (CDM. Mai com
Pirnie, WUS, Weston, Ebasco. B&V, and
Hill) have been identified to perform
diligent efforts to obtain insurance
from the private sector.
During the review of these identified
contractors, determine:
(a) what they have done to obtain
pollution liability insurance?
(b) if they have obtained it. how is it
charged (direct/indirect) and what
is the cost, coverage, etc.?
-------
W/P
P.EF
AUDITOR'S
INITIALS
DATE
Paae 15
VI. Review of Indirect Costs
1. Determine the contractor's established
indirect cost allocation bases and verify
that such bases are consistent with the
contract.
2.. Determine from the cognizant contracting
officer for indirect rates what the
currently approved rates *re and which
years have final negotiated rates.
3., Determine if indirect expense charges
are in accordance with applicable
contractual limitations.
Review contractor's most, recent:
Interim Financial Statements (YTD)
Certified Financial Statements
Projected F/Y Financial Statements
F/Y Budaet
5. Calculation of most recent overhead/0*A
Pates
a. Based on this data compute overhead
and G&A rates to determine if current
billing rates are reasonable,
1, Remove all unallowable expenses.
2. Remove expenses that are charosd
direct.
3. Review expenses to make sure they
were properly accrued.
4. Trace allocation bass to accounting
records (i.e. if labor dollars is
base, trace to oeneral ledger and
payroll reoister).
b. If rates were based on budget
information, compare actual costs to
the budget.
* 6, Verify that billings for indirect costs
are consistent with the contract
provisions and the BAFO.
7. Assure that Indirect Cost Submissions
are current, not over 90 days after FYE
-------
W/P AUDITOR'S
BfE. JJiniAJ=s_ DATE.
* VII. Review of Contractor's Management of the
Contract
Review of Contractual Reporting Require-
ments to determine whether the established
reports adequately provide all data
relevant to the review of financial
orogress under the contract and are
consistent with contractor's vouchers and
accounting records.
A. Review the monthly progress reports to
determine ifs
1. the expenditure of costs and hours for
both, contractor and subcontractor(s).
appear to be accurately reported.
2^ the reported hours are actuals or
estimates?
3. the estimated costs and hours to be
expended during the next reporting
period are reported.
4. the additional estimated costs and
hours needed to complete the work are
reported. And if not, reouest the
current cost-to-complete estimates
from the contractor if appropriate
fa) Get the contractor's explanation
of how they developed the cost-to
-complete estimates.
(i) Evaluate expense trends and
relationships.
(ii) Review any variance between
budget and actual performan-
ce (i.e. la bor skill mi x,
etc.).
(iii) Review past three (30 months
of cost to complete
estimates.
-------
W/P
REF
AUDITOR'S
INITIALS
DATE
Page 17
5. any problem(s) affecting completion
of the work within the authorized
budqet are reported.
(a) Compare the contractor's current
budqet for the contract to actual
expenses; follow up on any major
variance.
6. sufficient data is reported to monitor
the actual rate of expenditure of
hours and dollars for the overall
contract, as well as each individual
work assignment.
(a) do the reports show the contract-
or's calculated hourly rate (Total
Cost/Total Hours)?
Note: We should be able to compute
this data if the above reportinc!
requirements are beina performed by
the contractor.
If our review of the calculated hourly
rates indicate that there is a need to
redirect work efforts to complete the
work within the budqeted amounts, the
applicable Contracting Officer. Pro-
ject Officer, and Work Assignment
Managers should be informed
immediately.
B. Review the public vouchers and assure
that the costs are presented in the
format required by the contract and beina
billed IAW government regulations.
1. Are individual cost elements
adequately shown?
2. Are current month and cumulative costs
adequately shown?
3. Are subcontractor's costs properly
shown?
-------
W/P AUDITOR'S
REF . INITIALS DATE Paqe 13
VIII. SUHMARY
1, Summarize the results of the review.,
2* Disclose contract issues that need
interpretations or clarifications
Identify situations in ^hicb the
contractor is in non-compliance with
OAAP.
Recommend improvements to contract
financial progress reports so that
EPA may properly manage the contract:
a. Disclosure of the cost impact of
actual indirect expense rates
b. Explanations for major variances
between budget and actual variances.
c. Reporting of O/'T hours and premium,
d. Detailed projected expenses for next
three (3) months activity.
e. Graohs which detail variances
between each month's performance.
Conduct an exit conference with the
contractor to discuss the results of the
review to obtain verification of any
issues, facts, etc.
-------
W/P AUDITOR'S
REF INITIALS DATE
Paae 1?
IX. PREPARATION OF FINANCIAL MONITORING REPORT
1. Draft the financial monitoring report to
cover findings obtained. Include
qualifications on any limits to the
program due to lack of data, time, etc.
2. Obtain the Section Head Approval of the
draft.
3. Discuss results (Draft Report) with the
Contracting Officer, the Contract
Specialist and the FACO. for assurance of a
thorough understanding of the issues.
4. Prepare and Issue the final report.
?. Prepare findina codina sheet for FASTIS,
X. DRAFT SPECIFIC REQUESTS FOR AM IKITFRItl AUDIT,
Prepare list of specific audit areas for the
interim audit request and provide to Contract
Close Out Monitor.
XI. FOLLOW UP REVIEW
1. Prepare file notes for identification of
areas to be included in a follow up
• review.
XII, FOLLOW UP ON RESPONSE TO REPORT
1. Obtain Plan of Action and Milestones
CPOAFt) from Contracting Officer/
Contract Administrator if one is
prepared.
2, Review the PQAP! and discuss it with
the Contracting Officer/Administrator.
"J.. Track/Assist in resolution of findings
until closed. Provide summary to Section
Chief monthly.
-------
W/P AUDITOR'S
lhl!HALS_. DATE Paoe 20
EXTRA STEPS TO COVER IF TIME PERMITS
1. Review justification for exercise of options
A. Determine if a current analysis was
performed by EPA Cost Advisor* or DCAA
on reasonableness of costs/rates.
2* If possible, talk to employees
A. Talk to former employees
B. Talk to employees that may be leaving
the company in a few days/months and ask
. Why?
C. Determine why there is turnover in the
CPA firms, if applicable
3. Floor Check a sample of employees .< both
direct and indirect performing under this
contract
4. Review the contractor's Tax Returns
A. Check for Sale of Capital Assets
and for $ recovered that should offset
depreciation
5. Review the contractor's Board of Director's
Minute*
6. Use internal audit staff to identify some
findings
7. Be aware of idle Facilities
E 3., Determine whether contractor system credits
EPA (or no charge) equipment undergoing
maintenance and repair and associated labor-
while on-site.
E 9. Determine the number and obtain list of new
provisional equipment and labor rates
proposed by contractor since inception of
con tract,
Determine the number of these not yet
established as fixed rates
10. Verify contractor payment to employees
is consistent with wage determination
rates and FLSA and CWHSSA
-------
ENGAGEMENT LETTER
ATTN:
Dear
Contract number has been selected for a financial
monitoring review. In accordance with the audit clause 52.215-002
incorporated by reference in the contract, please make available your
accounting records and other documentation supporting the amounts invoiced and
your performance of the work under the contract.
The purpose of the review will be to determine ifs (1) your billing and
cost accounting systems are adequately creating accurate public vouchers and
monthly progress reports, (2) you are maintaining proper supporting
documentation -for exoenses charged directly to these contracts. (3) billing
rates for indirect expenses are supported and reasonable, (3) cost to complete
estimates &re accurate and (?) you are generally in compliance with the terms
of the contract.
In order to expedite our review please have the information requested in
Attachment A available for our review at your Corporate Headquarters in
_ ,. _ _ _ __ for the week of _ ...
Please provide all items identified with an asterisk * to us within two weeks
after receipt of this letter and any other items that are reasonably available
prior to our scheduled review date. We will hold an entrance conference upon
arrival at your office and immediately following the conference we will begin
our field work., __ _ _ will be the audi tor-in-^ charge of this
review. We will also hold a preliminary exit conference upon completion of
our field work.
During our review we will want to review your payroll register, cash
disbursements journal, general ledger, job cost ledger, time sheets, travel
vouchers and vendor invoices. Additional information and records may also be
requested during the course of this review. In order to expedite our review.
your assistance in assuring timely access and response to the requested data
would be extremely beneficial.
If you have any questions pertaining to this audit review, the auditor
may be reached at (202) 475 -
-------
-------
Please acknowledge receipt of this letter.
Thank you for your continued cooperation,.
Sincerely.
Dale W, 'Roberson. Chief
Financial Analysis Section
:c: All Contracting Officers involved with the contractor
EPA Project Officer
Contractor's Controller. Finance Officer, and/or Contracts Manaaer
-------
-------
ATTACHMENT A . Page 1 of 2
REQUESTED DATA FOR FINANCIAL MONITORING REVIEW
* 1.. Copy of most recent Certified Financial Statements
A. Interim Financial Statements (Year-to-Date)
B. Budgets for Current Fiscal Year 4 Next Fiscal Year
* 2. Public Vouchers for the most recent three (3) months
* 3. Required Monthly Proqress Reoorts for the same period indicated in 82
A. Monthly Progress Reports
B. Contract Financial/ Management Status Reoorts
C • Executi ve 3umm ar y Rep o r t s
D. Regional Summary Reports
E. Individual Work Assignment/Delivery Order Status Reports
P. Quality Assurance Reports
4. Written Policies and Procedures
A. Tiiie keeping
B, Travel
C. Subcontracting
D •. Pu r c has i n g/P r o cu r emen t
E, EauiDfnent/QDC rates
5. Timesheets and Payroll records for period indicated in M2
c- Supporting cost records- inclusive of paid invoices, cancelled checks.
and ledgers for selected vouchers
* 7. Schedules illustrating pool and base costs calculating;
A. Current Actual Indirect Rates
B. Actual Rates'for Last Fiscal Year
* 8., Current Cost-to-Complete Estimates for the Contract
A. An explanation of the actual procedures used for calculating
the Cost-to-complete estimates
B. An explanation of any variances between Budgeted and Actual costs
C. An explanation of the actual procedures used to monitor costs when
752 of the contract ceiling has been reached
* 9. Reconciliation of Booked vs Billed Costs (Inceotion-to-Date)
* 10. Provide schedules identifying all Overtime Premium charges billed under
this contract.
* 11. List of ail consultants utilized on this contract.
A. Provide a copy of the consultant, agreement
&» Provide the negotiated amount and oeriod of performance
C. Costs billed to date by Tionth for each consultant
-------
ATTACHMENT A Paae 2 of 2
* 12. Provide ?. list 'of all employees working on this contract
A. Name of employee
8. Identify employee by P-level
C. Provide current actual base labor rate
D, Hours billed to date by employee by P-level
13. Provide selected travel vouchers for the same period of vouchers
reviewed as requested.
* 14. Provide current list of Key Personnel. If there have been any changes
iince contract award, provide PlODtt with Contracting Officer approval.
Are the key personnel beina used to perform as required by the
contract? Provide Resumes as requested.
* 15. Provide List of all Subcontractors
A. Provide negotiated amount of each subcontract.
B. Copy of Subcontract Agreement (for subcontracts over $200,000)
C. Period 'of Performance of each subcontract
* 16,. Provide schedules showing LOE by contract performance periods and show
calculated percentages of LOE delivered.
* 17. Provide schedules of ODC's by cost element, since contract inception.
* 18. Provide a list of equipment utilized on the contract
*« Owned but previously leased
b. Leased
c. Owned
? I?, Provide Equipment Usage/Rental rates with data supporting how the rates
a rv? d e te r m i n ed an d ad j us ted „
* 20. Provide computer and other ODC billing rates with supporting data*
* 21. Provide copies of most recent Indirect Cost Submissions to EPA,
DCAA or other cognizant agency.
'# 22. Provide flow chart of accounting/billing system.
* 23. Provide an organization chart of the parent company and all
subsidiaries.
-------
ENTRANCE CONFERENCE QUESTIONS TO CONTRACTOR page 1 of 5
NAME OF CONTRACTOR ______________________________________________________________________
CONTRACT NUMBER _____________________________________________________________________________________
QUESTJ ONS..IO ..CQNJRACIQE
I. 1. Are there any Pre-contract costs incurred?
If so. is there an advance agreement?
2. Are? any contract modifications, pending? Discuss.
II. 1. Any follow-up questions from response to engagement letter?
2. When was your last Purchasing System Review performed by EPA or DCAA?
Was your system approved? If so, provide approval.
Has there been any recent Property/Equipment Compliance Review
performed by the Government? If so, please provide copy.
4". Discuss related party affiliations (if noted during review of Dun and
Bradstreet Report) and conflict of interest (if determined from
contractor's list of all clients and/or if the contractor work for
several customers simultaneously).
Ill, 1» What types of Internal Controls does the company have?
Is there an Internal Audit Staff?
Are there written Timekeeping Policies and Procedures?
IV. 1. How are bills prepared? That is, what are the source records, the
process followed, reconciliations, etc.?
Who prepares/reviews bills(invoices )?
Can the invoices be tied in directly to the job cost accounting
system (contract in total as well as by DO or WA)?
2. Are the total costs (by cost element) incurred on this contract
equivalent to the costs billed on the invoices?
If not. what differences exist?
•f faoiion 11 y :? r<=> voi."7h<5re 51.1 !?"ti tt^d'
-------
Page 2 of 5
IV. 3. Have all of the Work Assignments and/or Delivery Orders being worked
on been approved by the Contracting Officer?
Did you start working on any Work Assianment/Delivery Order prior tc
the effective date of the contract? If so, why?
4. Are there any excess funds (based on the comparison of billed costs
to estimated contract costs) that could be deobligated or transferred
A.. Prom one cost element to another?
B. From one work assignment to another?
5. Has there been any suspended or disallowed billings under this
contract?
If so, what is the current status?
'•>', At. Is your timekeeping/time reporting function separate from the
personnel and payroll functions? That is, does the same person(s)
who handles the timekeeping function also handle the Personnel and/or
Payroll functions?
Who fills out the timesheet?
Who signs the timesheet?
'ilho approves the time charged?
How often are timesheets prepared?
Do the timesheets contain necessary details to identify and allocate
labor costs to a contract, a work site, and multiple appropriations
accounts?
A2. Have there been any changes in key personnel identified in the
contract?
If so, provide Contract tied « with CO approval.
Are the key personnel being used to perform as required by the
contract'
A3. What is the accounting treatment of unpaid overtime?
What is the company's policy on unpaid overtime?
-------
Page 3 of 5
V. A4. Are there any consultants. Dart time employees, or subcontractors
billed under direct labor or as DDCs?
If so, identify who: how (what cost element) they were billed, what
services they provided, and their cost.
V. PI. What are your procedures for determination of accurate and reasonable
subcontractor accountinci systems and billinas?
Are they adequate and are they being followed?
Was a cooy of the Subcontract Plan submitted to EPA? If not. provide
a copy if available.
(i) How do you. monitor the subcontractors oerformance?
(ii'i Do you require* progress reoorts/billinqs for the
subcontractors?
fiii; Did the subcontractors provide a certificate of current cost or
pricing data to the prime?
S2. If you are a large business, do you submit invoices to EPA for
payment of subcontract costs before you pay the subcontractors?
E"3. Are any fixed laboratory rates used on this contract for
subcontractors? If so. how are they established?
V, Cl. Have any contractual ceilings (on any cost elements) been exceeded or
likely to be exceeded before completion of the contract?
If so, what cost element(s) and amounts?
C2, Discuss direct purchases of supplies, materials, equipment,, etc. to
determine whether property has been purchased and properly approved
un d e "' t he con t ra c t ?
C3« Has there been any contractor acquired equipment, previously leased
for t h e con t r a ct ?
If so, please provide a current listing.
-------
of
V. C4, Is there any leased equi patent. front outside vendors or inter/in tr.?
company owned, beinq utilized on the contract?
If so, please provide a list of all leased equi0ment on this
contract.
(a) Is the equipment leased from outside vendors?
(b) Is the equipment leased from an Inter/Intra Company?
(>:) Is the equipment owned by the contractor & leased to EF'A?
(d) Do you get title to any leased property? If so, when. And, is
the title obtained after the government pays for the property?
C5. (a) Computer Charaes:
Are they billed at actual rates or estimated rates?
If billed at estimated rates, are the estimated rates adjusted
to actuals? How and when?
If billed at estimated rates and not adjusted to actuals, how are
the over/under absorbed costs allocated (direct/indirect)?
That is. if the variance (over or under) is material in
amount, is it adjusted to the applicable contracts or adjusted
in the indirect pool(s) at least annually?
Motes If material, the contracts should be adjusted.
Are all clients beinp treated equally7
Provide supporting data for all formulas and adjustments made.
Verify that if depreciation is used as a part of the computer's
actual cost, it is deducted from the overhead pool,
(b) Equipment Usage/Rental rates:
How are the costs priced?
Is equipment (such as field equipment) billed on a rate
basis?
If -so, what are the billed rates and what is the basis
of the rates?
Provide supportiia data.
-------
paae ^ of 5
C5. fc) Fixed Laboratory rates:
Have you incurred «ny Lab. Support (ex: mobile lab.) costs?
If so. are you using a fixed rate to bill these costs?
If you are usina a fixed rate, what rate is being billed?
How are these rates established?
C&, Do Consultant supportino documentation provide evidence of the nature
and extent of services offered?
C7. Does the contractor's travel expenses comply with contractual
limitations, contractor's written policies and the GTR?
C8. Has fee (base fee. etc,) been billed in accordance with the contract?
Discuss.
C9, What has the contractor done to obtain pollution liability insurance?
If it has been obtained, how is it charged (direct/indirect) and what
is the cost, coverage, etc.?
VI, 1. Discuss overhead rates, billing vs actual, and reasons for any
variances,
Are the billed rates the same as the contractual billing rates?
Have the FYE Indirect Cost Submissions been submitted on a current
(not over 90 days after FYE) basis?
Determine who is the cognizant audit agency?
Which fiscal years have final negotiated rates?
VT.I. 1. Are the monthly progress, financial management and current status
reports beinq submitted on time and do they contain adeauate and
sufficient data as required by the contract?
fa) Do the monthly proaress reports tie to the applicable public
vouchers?
-------
-------
Contractor Purchasing System Reviews (CPSR)
Objective
A CPSR is a review of a contractor's total purchasing, subcontracting
and material control system.
The Federal Acquisition Regulation (EAR) covers the topic in Subpart
44.301, where it states the "the objective of the [CPSR] is to evaluate
the efficiency and effectiveness with which the contractor spends
government funds and complies with government policy when
subcontracting". The CPSR assures that the contractor applies sound
purchasing practices and provides maximum protection to the government.
The FAR further states, "The review provides the administrative
contracting officer (AGO) a basis for granting or withholding approval
of the contractor's purchasing system.
Please refer to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Manual for
Performance of Contractor Purchasing System Reviews (CPSR) for guidance
in the review of the contractor purchasing systems. It also provides
the Contractor Purchasing System Review Program.
XI-36
(8/90)
-------
-------
APPENDIX A
Cost Accounting Standards
i.
What is a Cost Accounting Standard (CAS)?
A CAS is a fairly general guideline for cost accounting
practices and procedures to assure more uniform treatment
of costs by government agencies and their contractors.
PL-91-379 created the Cost Accounting Standards Board
(CASE) as an agent of the Congress.
The CASB, while in existence from August 1970 until
September 1980, issued nineteen standards.
What are the Nineteen Standards?
CAS 401 - Consistency in Estimating, Accumulating and
Reporting Costs
The purpose of this standard is to insure that practices
used in estimating costs for a proposal are consistent with
cost accounting practices used in accumulating and reporting
costs.
CAS 402 - Consistency in Allocating Costs Incurred for
the Same Purpose
The purpose of this standard is to require that each
type of cost is allocated only once and on only one basis
to any contract or other cost objective. The criteria for
determining the allocation of costs to a product contract
or cost objective should be the same for all cost objectives.
CAS 403 - Allocation of Home Office Expenses to Segments
The purpose of this standard is to establish criteria
for the allocation of the expenses of a home office to the
segments of the organization such as one or two, or more,
divisions, plants or other sub-divisions which report
directly to the home office.
CAS 404 - Capitalization of Tangible Assets
The purpose of this standard is to establish criteria
for capitalization of tangible asset costs so that adherence
to the policy will facilitate consistent measurement of
costs over time.
A-l
-------
CAS 405 - Accounting for unallowable costs
The purpose of this standard is to facilitate the
negotiation, audit/ administration and settlement of contract
costs by establishing guidelines for the identification of
unallowable costs and the consistent treatment of these costs
using sound cost accounting principles. (This standard does
not govern the allowability of costs.)
CAS 406 - Cost Accounting Period
The purpose of this standard is to provide guidelines
for the selection and establishment of time periods for
the use of cost estimating, accumulating and reporting.
Through the establishment of time periods the effects of
variations in the flow of costs will be reduced, the contract
closing process will be more objective, consistent and
reliable and contract cost measurements will be uniform in
comparative analysis.
CAS 407 - Use of Standard Costs for Direct Material
and Direct Labor
The purpose of this standard is to specify the conditions
under which the contractors can employ standard costs for
direct materials and direct labor.
CAS 408 - Accounting for costs of compensated personal
absence
The purpose of this standard is to require that the costs
of compensated personal absence be charged to the accounting
period in which it was earned and that the cost for an entire
cost accounting period be allocated" or a pro-rata basis to the
final cost objectives.
CAS 409 - Depreciation of Tangible Capital Assets
The purpose of this standard is to provide the
guidelines for
0 determining the service life of an asset
0 selection of a depreciation method
0 determining the residual value
0 determining the disposition of gains or
losses on retirement
0 determining the allocation of depreciation
to cost objective
A-2
-------
CAS 410 - Allocation of Business Unit General and
Administrative Expenses to Final Cost
Objectives
The purpose of this cost accounting standard is to
provide criteria for the allocation of business unit
general and administrative (G&A) expenses to business
unit final cost objectives based on their beneficial
or causal relationship.
CAS 411 - Accounting for Acquisition Costs of
Material
The purpose of this standard is to assure the
consistency of accounting for material costs and that
the policies for accounting for material costs are in
writing.
CAS 412 - Composition and Allocation of Pension
Costs
The purpose of this cost accounting standard is to
provide guidance on determining a period's pension cost.
CAS 413 - Adjustment and Allocation of Pension Cost
The purpose of this standard is to provide guidance
on the assignment of actuarial gains and losses ancL, the
valuation of the assets in the pension fund. It also
provides guidance on the allocation of pension costs to
segments.
CAS 414 - Cost of Money as an Element"Of the Cost
of Facilities Capital "
•%,
The purpose of this standard is to provide some
cost recognition of the impact of inflation upon fixed
assets and makes some provision for the cost of money
invested in fixed assets.
CAS 415 - Accounting for the Cost of Deferred
Compensation
The purpose of this cost accounting standard is to
provide the guidance for the identification, measurement,
and allocation of compensation to employees (i.e. pensions)
A-3
-------
CAS 416 - Accounting for Insurance Costs
The purpose of this standard is to provide criteria for
the measurement of insurance costs, the assignment of such
costs to cost accounting periods and their allocation to
cost objectives. The application of these criteria should
increase the probability that insurance costs are allocated
to cost objectives in a uniform and consistent manner.
CAS 417 - Cost of Money as an Element of the Cost
of Capital Assets Under Construction
This standard provides for the determination of an inputed
cost of money to be included in the capitalized cost of
acquisition of assets developed, fabricated or constructed
for a contractor's own use. Application of this standard
will provide increased uniformity in accounting for the
acquisition costs of assets.
CAS 418 - Allocation of Direct and Indirect Costs
The purpose of this Cost Accounting Standard is (a) to
provide for consistent determination of direct and indirect
costs, (b) to provide criteria for the accumulation of
indirect costs, including service center and overhead costs,
in indirect cost pools, and (c) to provide guidance relating
to the selection of allocation measures based on the beneficial
or causal relationship between an indirect cost pool and cost
objectives. Consistent application of these criteria and
guidance will improve classification of costs as direct and
indirect and the allocation of indirect costs.
CAS 420 - Accounting for Independent Research and
Development and Bid and Proposal Costs
The purpose of this Cost Accounting Standard is to provide
criteria for the accumulation of independent research and
development costs and bid and proposal costs and for the
allocation of such costs to cost objectives based on the
beneficial or causal relationship between such costs and
cost objectives. Consistent application of these criteria
will improve cost allocation.
A-4
-------
How did Cost Accounting Standards evolve?
1968 - Admiral Rickover, at Defense Production Act hearing,
was invited to comment on the general area of defense
procurement. In his testimony, he made some specific
comments on accounting practices. They were:
"The lack of uniform accounting standards
is the most serious deficiency in
Government procurement today."
"Industry will not establish such standards
because it is not to their advantage to do
so."
"The accounting profession 'has had ample
time and opportunity to establish effective
standards' but pays 'only lip service to
the concept.'"
"If uniform accounting standards are ever
to be established, the initiative will
have to come from Congress."
- The Bill, however, as reported out by the House,
contained nothing about accounting standards.
- In the Senate, Senator Proxmire added an amendment to
the Bill requiring the Comptroller General to do a
feasibility study for applying uniform cost accounting
standards to all defense procurement of $100,000 or
more. (PL-91-370)
- GAO study was completed in August 1970, recommending
the development of CAS. Congress agreed. The Cost
Accounting Standards Board was established as an agent
of Congress to develop standards for defense
procurements. (PL-91-379)
- In July of 1972, GSA issued a temporary regulation
making CAS applicable to non-defense contracts and
subcontracts.
- In December of 1974, PPR Section 1-3.1200 was imple-
mented formally extending CAS to civilian procurement.
- And now Federal Acquisition Regulation Part 30
implements CAS.
A-5 '
-------
How does the Contracting Officer determine CAS applicability
under FAR or FPR?
Cost Accounting Standards for Nondefense Contracts (FAR)
Is the contract:
- with a small business or,
- with an educational institution or,
- with a foreign government or,
- formally advertised or,
- $100,000 or less or,
- awarded based on adequate price competition or,
- price set by law or regulation or,
- awarded pursuant to a labor surplus area set
aside or,
- price based on established catalog or market
prices of commercial items sold in substantial
quantities to the general public?
I
YRS (^ No cost accounting
'standards apply
•>
Is the business unit currently performing any CAS-covered
national defense contracts?
NO ^ No cost accounting
standards apply
YES
Did the contractor receive:
- a single national defense CAS-covered contract
award of S10M or more, or
- S10M or more in national defense CAS-covered
contract awards during the preceeding accounting
period, or
- Less than S10M in national defense CAS-covered
contracts in the preceeding accounting period
but such awards were 10% or more of sales?
A-6
-------
NO
YES
All Cost Accounting Standards
Apply. Insert FAR clauses
at 52.230-3 "Cost Account-
ing Standards" and 52.230-4
"Administration of Cost
Accounting Standards".
Only Cost Accounting
Standards 401 and 402
apply. Insert- FAR
clauses at 52.230-5
"Disclosure and Con-
sistency of Cost Ac-
counting Practices"
and 52.230-4 "Admin-
istration of Cost
Accounting Standards".
A-7
-------
Cost Accounting Standards for Nondefense Contracts (FPR)
Is the contract:
- with a small business, a State or local government,
an educational institution, a foreign government,
a hospital, the Canadian Commercial Corporation, or
- $100,000 or less or,
- to be performed outside the U.S., possessions or
territories or,
" price based on established catalog or market prices
of commercial items sold in substantial quantities
to the general public?
YES No Cost Accounting
Standards Apply
NO
Is the business unit currently performing any CAS-covered
national defense contracts or is this contract in excess of
$500,000?
NO . No Cost Accounting
Standards Apply ^v
YES
Is the contract fixed price after receiving at least two offers
from the unassociated firms and, (1) the solicitation sent to
all firms was identical, (2) price is the only consideration,
(3) the lowest responsive offer is accepted, and {4} the
business unit receiving the award is not performing under a
CAS-covered nationl defense contract.
JfES No Cost Accounting
Standards Apply
NO
Did the contractor receive:
- a single national defense CAS-covered contract
award of $10M or more, or
- $10M or more in national defense CAS-covered
contract awards during the preceeding accounting
period, or
- less than $10M in national defense CAS-covered
contracts in the preceeding accounting period but
such awards were 10% or more of sales?
A-8
-------
NO
YES
All Cost Accounting Standards
Apply. Insert FPR clauses
at l-3.1204-2(a) "Cost
Accounting Standards-
Nondefense Contracts" and
l-3.1204-l(a)(2) "Administra-
tion of Cost Accounting
Standards".
Only Cost Accounting
Standards 401 and 402
apply. Insert FPR
clauses at l-3.1204-2(b)
"Disclosure and Con-
sistency of Cost Ac-
counting Practices"
and 1-3.1204-Ka) (2)
"Administration of Cost
Accounting Standards".
A-9
-------
What are the CD's responsibilities for CAS at FPA?
(!) The CO is responsible for the proper notices
in the solicitation package and for assuring
that the correct clauses go in the contract.
(2) The process for contractors is self certifica-
tion. You rely on the certifications given in
the representations and certification section
of the solicitation package.
(3) How the contractor answers the question will
determine which clauses should be inserted in
the contract. The contractor will be subject
to:
If
Full Coverage
v
Modified Coverage
No CAS coverage
Then ......
All standards apply
only CAS 401, 402 apply
v/aive all standards
A-10
-------
APPENDIX B
SELECTED CLAUSES
This section highlights certain clauses under the Federal
Acquisition Regulations and the EPAAR which are relevant
to cost and price analysis.
The implementation of FAR brought many changes to the
procurement process. Follwing are some of the more
significant changes.
52.215-1 Examination of Records by Comptroller General
The Comptroller General shall have access to,
and the right to examine any of the contractor's
"directly pertinent books, documents, papers
or other records" within 3 years after final
payment or a shorter period specified in FAR
Subpart 4.7.
(a) applies to negotiated contracts
exceeding 810,000
{b) applies to first tier subcontracts
- excludes purchase orders less
than $10,000
52.215-2 Audit - Negotiation
The contractor shall maintain and the
contracting officer shall have the right to
examine and audit all pertinent data relating
to the contract.
If the contractor was required to submit cost
and pricing data, then the contracting officer
has the right of examination.
The contractor shall make records available
at all reasonable times.
(a) includes all subcontracts over
510,000.
B-l
-------
52.214-26 Audit - Formal
Cost or pricing data is subject to examination
for modifications over $100,000 unless modifica-
tion was competed, catalog or market price or
set by law.
(a) Comptroller General has same rights
(b) applies to subcontracts over $10,000
Records must be made available by the contractor.
52.215-24 Subcontractor Cost or Pricing Data
Any subcontract or modification expected to
exceed $500,000 requires cost and pricing data
unless price is based on
(a) competition
(b) catalog or market
(c) set by law
Contractor shall require subcontractor certification,
52.216-5 Price Redetermination
52.216-6
Invokes Part 31 of the FAR, Contract Cost Principles,
for both prospective and retroactive price
adjustments.
52.215-22 Price Reduction for Defective Cost or Price Data
52.215-23
Applicable to a) contracts/subcontracts over
$500,000
b) required to certify current
cost and pricing data
Contract price or cost may be reduced because of
defective cost or pricing data submitted by either
the prime contractor or subcontractor.
B-2
-------
52.215.30 Facilities Capital Cost of Money
waiver of Facilities Capital Cost of Money
Discussed in section III
52.216-7 Allowable Cost and Payment
Part 31 of the FAR determines allowability of
reimbursable costs, together with any specific
provisions which may be contained in the
contract.
52.216-10 Fixed Fee, Fixed Fee-Construction, Incentive Fee
Fee is paid in accordance with the contract
award schedule, up to an amount equal to 85%
of total fee, after which the contracting officer
may withhold further payment of fee in a reserve
amount that is considered necessary to protect
the Government's interest.
(a) the reserve amount shall not exceed
15% of total fee or $100,000, whichever
is less.
Reserve fee is liquidated upon settlement of final
payment voucher.
1552.242-70
52.216-7(d)
Indirect Cost Rates
Contracting officer shall insert EPAAR clause
1552.242-70, Indirect Costs in solicitations
and contracts where indirect costs apply.
The operative term for indirect cost rates is
no longer "provisional rates". It is "billing
rates."
The policy under FAR 42.703 for establishing
final indirect cost rates is:
(a)
(b)
a single agency shall bind all other
agencies and their contracting
officers unless otherwise specified
by statute.
indirect costs for cost reimbursement
contracts and fixed price contract
progress payments shall be reimbursed
by applying billing rates and final
indirect cost rates.
B-3
-------
52.230
It is the policy of EPA for the Cost Policy and
Rate Negotiation Section of P&CMD to be responsible
for negotiating indirect costs rates in accordance
with EPA contracting officer determination
procedures. (EPAAR 1542.705-1}
The EPA contract specialist, with the assistance
of the cost advisory offices, shall place the
established billing rates in newly awarded
contracts.
- billing rates may be established or revised
by the CPRN section, the auditing activity
or another Federal Government agency.
billing rates may be prospectively or retro-
actively revised by mutual agreement, at the
request of either the Government or the
contractor to prevent substantial overpayment -
or underpayment.
CAS Notices & Certification
Covered in Appendix A of this manual.
52.232-20 Limitation of Cost
Requires the contractor to notify, in writing,
the contracting officer.
(a) 60 days prior to the time when 75%
of the estimated cost will be
exceeded, or if,
(b) the total cost for the performance of
this contract, exclusive of fee will
be either greater or substantially
less than had been previously
estimated.
Requires the contractor to submit a revised
proposal.
The Government is not obligated to reimburse the
contractor for costs incurred in excess of
estimated cost in the award schedule.
The contracting officer is the only person
authorized to revise the estimated cost.
B-4
-------
APPENDIX C
40 CFR Part 33 (EPA), Procurement
Under Assistance Agreements
C-l
-------
12922 . _ Federal Keaister /Vol.48. No. 60 /Monday. March 28.19fl3 / Rules and Regulations
•VJRONMENTAL PROTECTION
EHCY
40 CFR Part 33
[OA-FRU 2210-3]
Procurement Under Assistance
Agreements
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTON: Final rule.
SUMMARY: This document makes the
Environmental Protection Agency's Part
33, "Procurement Under Assistance
Agreements." a final rule. Part 33
establishes the rules for all procurement
undertaken by recipients of EPA
assistance agreements. In accordance
with OMB Circular A-102, Attachment
O. and OMB Circular A-110,
Attachment O this rule is designed lo
rely heavily on recipients' procurement
systems. Part 33 applies to all Catalog of
Federal Domestic Assistance Programs
in the 66.000 series.
DATE: This rule is effective for
assistance agreements which EPA
awards on and after March 28,1983.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mchard A, Johnson. Grants-
.dministration Division (PM-218),
environmental Protection Agency,
Washington, D.C. 20460, (202) 382-5296.
SUPMCMENTARY INFORMATION: On ..
September 18,1981, EPA published in
the Federal Register {46 FR 45963) a- •
Notice of Availability which made a
draft of Part 33 available for public
comment.
On March 2,1982, EPA published a
proponed Part 33 in the Federal Register
147 FR «960). and on May 12,1982. EPA
published in the Federal Register (47 FR
20474] an interim-final Part 33. The May
12.1982. interim-final rule became
effective only for EPA's construction
grants program.
On July 8,1982. EPA reopened the
comment period on Section 33.240
"Small, minority, women's and labor
surplus area businesses" (47 FR 29668).
The comment period on this section was
extended 30 days because it
significantly changes EPA's existing
minority business and women's
business policies.
We made numerous editorial changes
throughout the interim-final rule in order
to make this final rule easier to read and
understand.
Implementation
Because we published an interim-final
and final Part 33 rule, we have added
this section to explain when the interim-
final is effective and when the final rule
- is effective.
1. If EPA awarded a wastewater
treatment construction grant under Title
II of the Clean Water Act before May 12,
1982, the recipient has the following
options:
(a) The redolent may follow the
procurement requirements in effect .
when EPA awarded its construction
grant, or
(b) The recipient may follow the
procurement requirements in the May 12
interim-final rule, provided the recipient
completed and submitted EPA Form
5700-18 to the award official before the
effective date of this final rule, or
(c) The recipient may follow the
procurement requirements in the final
rule.
2. If EPA awarded a construction
grant betwnen May 12,1982, and the
effective date of this rule, the recipient
has the following options.
(a) The recipient may follow the
procurement requirements in the May 12
interim-final rule, provided the recipient
completed and submitted EPA Form
570n-w to the award offical before the
effective date of this final rule.
(b) If the recipient did not submit EPA
Form 5700-48 before the effective date
of this rule, the recipient must follow the
procurement requirements in this final
rule. The recipient must complete the
appropriate part of EPA Form 5700-48
and submit the form to the award
official as required in § 33.110.
3. Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act of 1980. "Superfund" awards made
after March 2.1982, Included the
proposed Part 33 rule (47 FR 8960) as a
special condition in each cooperative
agreement
Superfund awards made after May 12,
19B2, included the interim-final Part 33
{47 FR 20474) as a special condition in
each cooperative agreement.
Superfund awards made after the
effective date of this final rule are
subject to the final rule.
4. If EPA awarded any other
assistance agreement (other than
construction grants and Superfund
awards) before the effective date of this
rule, the recipient has the following
options:
(al The recipient may follow the
procurement requirements in effect
when EPA awarded the assistance
agreement or
{b) The recipient may follow the
procurement requirements in the final
rule. The recipient must complete the
appropriate part of EPA Form 5700-*8
and submit the form to the award
official aa required in 5 33.110.
EPA Form 5700-AB "Procurement
System Certification"
This form implements the self-
certification process. Subpart A
"Procurement System Evaluation"
explains how EPA and the recipient will
use the form. For the reader's
• convenience, we have included a copy
of the form after Appendix A.
Description of Major Issues
Quality Assurance
On June 14.1979. EPA established
quality assurance requirements for all
EPA extramural projects involving
environmental measurements. The
objective of the quality assurance (QA)
program is to ensure that all
environmentally related measurements
which are required or funded by EPA
are scientifically valid, defensible, and
of known precision and accuracy. Under
the program, contractors must submit
QA plans to the recipient if contract
activities will include environmentally
related measurements. The reference to
EPA's QA program is being added to
{ 33.1030, clause 13. "Responsibility of
the Contractor," paragraph (a), in order
to make contractors aware of the policy.
The QA requirements are specified in
guideline documents available from: Sid
Verner, Environmental Protection
Agency, Office of Research and
Development (RD*880), 401 M Street,
S.W., Washington. D.C 20460, (202) 382-
5787.
Major Comments Received
We received over 125 comments on
the March 2,1982, proposed rule. The
preamble to the May 12,1982, interim-
final rule addressed some of these
comments in detail. Since EPA's position
on the issues discussed in that preamble
is unchanged, we have not repeated
those discussions here. The following
discussion addresses the other areas of
the regulation which received the
greatest number of comments:
Section 33.005 Definitions.
We reserved the definitions of
minority business enterprise (MBE] and
women's business enterprise fWBE) in
the May 12.1982, interim-final
regulation. We are adding those
definitions now.
We received several comments on the
definition of MBE in the September 9.
1981, draft regulation which was mads
available to the public for comment by
notice in the Federal Register on
September 16,1W (49 FR 45963). That
definition used the Srnall Business
Administration's (SBA) definition of
minority group members, which
-------
Federal Register / Vol. 48. No. 60 / Monday. March 28, 1983 / Rules and Regulations 12923
rei
•
excluded persons from the Indian
bcontinent from the definition of
an American." Because a number of
eople from the Indian subcontinent
ave participated in EPA's MBE
program for construction grants, we are
now revising the September 9,1981,
definition to include businesses owned
and controlled by individuals from the
Indian subcontinent. We understand
that the SBA is now considering a
petition to include persons from the
Indian subcontinent in its definition of
"Asian Americans."
We also received comments on the
need for a definition of the terms
"Intergovernmental Agreement" and
"SuppHes;" therefore, we added
definitions for these terms.
Section 33.110 Applicant and recipient
certification.
We received questions on the
regulatory authority retained by the EPA
award official when the recipient
certifies its procurement system. To
clarify the authority the award official
retains, we have added paragraph [e] to
§ 33.110 "Applicant and recipient
certification."
Section 33,211 Recipient reporting
requirements.
This is a new section which gives the
porting requirements recipients must
follow even if the recipient certifies its
procurement system. Paragraph (a)
through (d) of this section lists the
information the Department of Labor
(Dot) requires for each construction
subagreement award which exceeds or
is expected to exceed $10,000. The Dot
requires this information to implement
the Davis-Bacon Act, Copeland
Regulations, Work Hours and Safety
Standards Act and the equal
employment opportunity requirements in
Executive Order 11246. Executive Order
11375 and DOL regulations in 41 CFR
Part 60. Paragraph (e) of this section
requires that recipients submit to the
award official a copy of the tabulation
of bids or offerers and the name of the
bidder or offerer for each subagreement
the recipient awards. EPA needs this
information to efficiently implement
EPA's debarment and suspension
regulation (40 CFR Part 32 "Debarment
and Suspension Under EPA Assistance
Programs").
Section 33330 Competition,
We received several comments on the
requirements in $ 33.230(c) for the use of
prequalified list We allow recipients
use prequalified lists of persons, firms
or products because they play an
important part in many State and local
procurement systems. However.
because a prequalified list could unduly
restrict competition, we require that
recipients provide adequate public
notice that they are maintaining a
prequalified list that the recipient
update the list at least every six months
and that the recipient review and act on
each request for prequalification made
more than 30 days before the closing
date for receipt of proposals or bid
opening. We believe that these
requirements will allow potential
contractors sufficient access to the list
and will minimi^ the noncompetitive
nature of such lists.
We also received several comments
on the prohibition in $ 33.230(b)(4)
against the use of local or in-State
bidders' or proposers' preference. We
included this prohibition because a
preference for local or in-State bidders
unduly restricts competition. If the local
or in-State bidder is more familiar with
the local conditions, or can more readily
mobilize its resources and can.
therefore, provide the work more
economically or efficiently, a preference
is not necessary because its bid or
proposal should reflect this familiarity
or mobility.
Section 33.240 Small, minority,
women's and labor surplus area
businesses.
m
We are continuing to review EPA's
minority and women's business
enterprise (MBE/WBE) provisions in
§ 33.240. We reserved § 33.240(b) for any
additional MBE/WBE requirements
which the Agency may impose.
On December 17,1982. President
Reagan issued a Statement on Minority
Business Enterprise Development which
encourages Federal assistance agencies
to achieve reasonable minority business
participation in contracts under
assistance agreements. The President
noted that minority business
procurement by recipients could arr.ount
to SB to $7 billion through FY1985. The
President also indicated that an
Executive Order on Minority Business
Enterprise will be forthcoming, and that
the Interagency Council for Minority
Business Enterprise will establish
uniform guidelines to implement the
Order. EPA will then review and revise.
if necessary, its MBE/WBE provisions in
§ 33.240 to assure that they are
consistent with the requirements of
Executive Order.
In this rule. S 33.240 contains only
those provisions allowed by Attachment
O. Paragraph 9. Therefore, the MBE
policy (43 FR 60220, December 28.1978]
and the WBE policy (45 FR 51490,
August 1.1960) are no longer mandatory
for recipients of construction grants who
are subject to the interim-final or final
Part 33 rule. However, any EPA
recipient may adopt these policies, iin
whole or in part, by including provisions
in their solicitations and subagreements.
In any event recipients and contractors
must comply with the affirmative step
requirements in $ 33.240 and any other
requirements of the State or the
recipient.
We also received a substantial
number of comments on the absence of
percentage goals in § 33.240 for MBE
and WBE participation in EPA-funded
work. We no longer require recipients to
include goals in their specifications, nor
will the EPA regions set goals for MBE
or WBE participation. In the past goals
served as a tool to determine whether
the affirmative steps required by OMB
Circular A-102, Attachment O were
adequately carried out by the assistance
recipient and its contractors. In keeping
with EPA's policy to transfer
procurement responsibilities to
recipients, the Agency believes that
recipients and States should decide how
to implement the required affirmative
steps. Therefore, recipients may use
their own goals. State goals, or other
standards.
Several commenters noted that the
regulation was not clear on whether the
affirmative steps must be undertaken for
each group of businesses—small,
minority-owned and women-owned.'
Recipients must take the affirmative
steps in § 33.240 for each group. For
example, solicitation of MBE's aione
will not satisfy the requirements of
§ 33.240; the recipient must also attempt
to contract with small and women's
businesses.
We also received several comments
that § 33.240fa)(6) differs from OMB
Circular A-102. Attachment O, section
9.a.(6). The commenters pointed nut that
Attachment O requires that the first tier
contractor take the affirmative steps (1)
through (5) only if the contractor plans
to award subagreements. Therefore %e
have revised § 33.240(81(6) to make it
consistent with OMB Circular A-102.
Attachment 0.
Several commenters susgested that
we add a definition of "labor surplus
area." The Secretary of Labor is
responsible for defining labor surplus
area. This definition is contained in 20
CFR Part 6S4, "Special Responsibilities
of the Employment Sen-ice System."
With respect to EPA's construction
grants program, we received comments
concerning the use of MBE/WBE's in
facilities planning and design work. As a
result of the 1981 Amendments to the
Clean Water Act, EPA cannot directly
involve itself in the facilities planning
and design activities preceding the
C-3
-------
•
12924 Federal Register / Vol. 48. No. 60 / Monday. March 28. 1983 / Rules and Regulations
• award of a construction grant However,
It is EPA's policy to encourage potential
grant recipients to adopt procurement
procedures that at a minimum, include
the affirmative steps in { 33.240 for all
activities of their construction program.
Section 33^55 Specifications.
One commenter asked if the
Justification for the use of a restrictive
specification had to be included in the
specification itself. That is not the case.
The justification for the use of a
restrictive specification must be
documented and induded in.the
recipient's files.
We also receive a recommendation
that we limit use of "brand name or
equal" specifications to procurements
for the acquisition of equipment and
services, and prohibit the use of a brand
name or eaual specification for the
procurement of pipe and similar
materials.
We believe it is inappropriate to
adopt this recommendation for two
reasons. First neither Attachment 0 nor
the Clean Water Act as amended,
provide for any restriction of this nature.
Second, there may be instances in the
procurement of materials when the
redpient's procuring official must resort
to use of a "brand name or equal"
specification.
Although we prefer the use of design
or performance based specifications, we
agree that use of a "brand name or
equal" specification is generally not
advisable in procurements for the
acquisition of materials. Instead, the
recipient should determine whether a
national or industry standard has been
developed. If developed, such a
standard may provide both the recipient
and prospective contractors a more
accurate description of the material to
be purchased than would a "brand name
or equal" specification.
A "brand name or equal"
specification can be used only when the
recipient determines that it is
Impractical or uneconomical for it to
make a clear and accurate description of
its technical requirements in the
specifications.
Section 33380 Payments to consultants.
We received several comments thaT"^
this section does not make it dear that
consultants may receive compensation
in excess of the GS-18 rate, but that the
Federal government will limit its
participation in a payment to a
consultant to the maximum daily rate
for a GS-18. We have, therefore, revised
the wording in this section to make this
dear.
We also revised paragraph (b) to
clarify that the GS-18 rate limitation
does not apply to firms.
Section 33.295 Subagreements awarded
by a contractor.
We received questions about the
applicability of Part 33 to subagreements
awarded by a contractor. We revised
$ 33.295 to clarify and explain which
procurement requirements apply and"
that they apply only to the tier
immediately below the contractor (i.e.
subagreements awarded by the
contractor.) However, this section does
not apply to a Brat tier subagreement
awarded by the recipient to a supplier.
That is. the section does not apply to a
supplier's procurement of materials to
produce equipment materials, and
catalog, off-the-shelf, or manufactured
items.
We also added three requirements we
inadvertently omitted from the proposed
.and interim-final rules. These three
requirements existed in EPA's previous
procurement regulations, in 40 CFR
30.340-2 (a) through (d). and (g) and are
proposed in 40 CFR 30.301 [a] (11 through
(4) and (7)], the profit requirements in
S 33.235. and the specification
requirements in $ 33.255.
Section 33.S20 Negotiation and award
of subagreement.
We reworded paragraph (a} to clarify
that the recipient must state in the
Request For Proposal (RFP) that he can
make the award based on initial offers
alone. If the recipient does not make
such a statement in the RFP.Hhe
recipient must conduct meaningful
negotiations with all of the best
qualified offerers with acceptable
proposals and permit revisions to obtain
best and final offers.
Section 33.525 Optional procedure for
negotiation and award of
subagreements for architectural and
engineering services.
Several commenters suggested that
we revise this section to delete the word
"optional" in the title. We included the
word optional to make it dear that the
procedures in this section are not
mandatory. This is in keeping with OMB
Circular A-102. Attachment O,
paragraph ll.c.(5). which dearly states
i that these procedures are optional.
\ We also revised this section to
\ explain the optional procedure in more
IdetaiL
^Section 33.715 Use of the same architect
lor engineer during construction,
I We received comments concerning
/ S 33.7l5(a], which lists the
/ circumstances under which a recipient
can use the same architect or engineer
that performed any or all of the
planning or design services for the
architectural or engineering services
during Step 3 construction of the project.
The concern was whether $ 33.715{a)(4)
applies to $ 33.715W (1), [2} and (3) or to
S 33.715fa)(3) only. Section 33.715{a)(4}
applies to § 33.715{a)f3) only. Therefore,
we restructured $ 33.715(a) (3) and (4) to
combine their requirements into a new
S 33.715(a)(3).
Also, we changed this section to allow
recipient's of either a Step 1 or a Step 2
grant to use the same architect or
engineer (A/E) during construction of
the project without further advertising or
negotiations, if the recipient selected the
A/E in accordance with the EPA
procurement regulation in effect when
EPA awarded tbs Step 1 or Step 2 grant.
Subpart D—Requirements for
Institutions of Higher Education and
Other Nonprofit Organizations
Several commenters stated that the
requirements for nonprofit organizations
exceed the requirements in OMB
Circular A-11Q. Attachment O. While
not all of the requirements in Part 33 are
required by OMB Circular A-ltO,
Attachment O, we believe that they
necessary to ensure efficient and
effective program management. OMB
reviewed and approved all of these
requirements during the regulatory
review process.
Sections 33.10J 5 throusih 33.1021
Subagreement clauses.
In the proposed and interim-final rules
we included separate sections in
Subpart F explaining the four labor
standards provisions required by the
Department of Labor (DoL). In these
versions of the rule, we briefly
explained each of these requirements
and referred the recipient to the
appropriate DoL regulation. The
recipient then had to rend the DoL
regulation and develop a clause which
met the requirement However, since
several of the DoL regulations require
the use of a standard clause and
because EPA has a form (EPA Form
5720-1 "Labor Standards Provisions For
Federally Assisted Construction
Contracts"} which contains the
appropriate DoL dauses and which has
been approved by DoL. we added
$ 33.1^6 "Labor standards provisions'
which requires recipients to use EPA
Form 5720-4. We believe this will
reduce the burden on recipients and
help implement the DoL requirements.
C-4
-------
Federal Register /Vol. 48. No. 60 / Monday. March 28. 1983 / Rules and Regulations 12925
ion 33.1030 Clauses Changes.
Comments we received during an EPA
internal review of this Pan suggested
that we change this clause to eliminate
the reference to oral change orders in
paragraph (a){2). The change was
suggested to improve the management of
change orders and to reduce program
costs. We agree that oral change orders
may lead to mismanagement and add to
program costs, sod have, therefore.
changed this clause. The subject of
change order management was
addressed in EPA'e Office of Inspector
General's September 21, 1982, report on
change orders "Report on Audit and
Administration of Change Orders Under
EPA's Construction Grant Program."
This report was undertaken as part of
the President' » Council on Integrity and
Efficiency's study on change orders
under contraction programs.
Section 33.3030 QameS Price
Reduction for Defective Cost or Pricing
Data.
We received comments that
paragraph 10(b) of 40 CFR Part 35.
Subpan E. Appendix C-l should be
added to the end of mis clause in order
to allow a disagreement over a
reduction in price to fall under the
remedies clause of the stibagree'ment.
We agree and have added a paragraph
(b) to this clause.
Another eommenter pointed out that
by raising the effective level of this
clause from SIOO.QOO to $500.000. we
were excluding most of the
subagreements for services on Step 3
construction grant projects. We have.
therefore, changed the effective level of
this clause back to the SlOO.OOO level.
Section 33.1O30 Clause 8 Audit;
Access to Resorts.
We added a new paragraph (f) and
revised paragraph (g) to clarify when the
right of accesa clause applies.
Meeting With Interest Groups
On May 6, 1382, at the request of the
Water and Wastewater Equipment
Manufacturers Association (WWEMA],
EPA held a public meeting to discuss
several issues. Present at the meeting
were representatives from groups with
special interest in procurement under
EPA assistance agreements, including
the National Institute of Governmental
Purchasing (N1GP), the Association of
General Contractors [AGC}, the
American Consulting Engineers Council
(ACEC). and the American Public
Works Association (APWA]. A tape of
this meeting is on file with EPA's Docket
Section in Docket No. G-81-4. In
addition, the positions of the various
groups are contained in written
. comments also in the Docket. The
sections discussed at this meeting were:
Section 33.255 Specifications.
The issue was whether to delete the
requirement of 5 33.255 that if a "brand
name or equal" description is used, the
salient characteristics of the named
brand must also be stated. The
requirement to include th« named
brand's salient characteristics in the
specification is a requirement in
Attachment O to OMB Circular A-102,
and is specifically called for in House of
Representatives Report No. 97-270, 97th
Congress. 1st Session, October 12.1982,
(page 12). which accompanied the bill
that became Public Law 97-117.
Therefore, EPA cannot change the
requirement to include the named
brand's salient characteristics.
Section 33.1015 Subagmesnent
provisions clause.
The issue was whether to mandate
progress payments for undelivered.
specificaUy manufactured items of
equipment having long production times.
One eommenter befieved that requiring
recipient* to make progress payments
for such items would reduce equipment
costs because manufacturers include in
their equipment price the interest on
money they borrow to produce the
equipment While progress payments
could reduce the cost of some
equipment. Treasury Circular 1075 does
not require progress payments;
therefore, EPA will not require them.
This does not preclude recipients from
making progress payments for such
items and we encourage those who find
it in their interest to allow progress
payments.
Section 33.J030(b) Clause 4 Differing
Site Conditions.
The issue was whether EPA shoulb*
require a clause to cover situations
where the actual characteristics of the
influent to a wastewater treatment
works differs significantly from those on
which the original design was based.
Participants in the meeting decided that
a joint WWEMA/ACEC/AGC task
group would provide EPA a suggested
draft clause covering this issue. EPA
considered the tank group's suggestion
and decided that, although the clause
addresses an important issue, it is act
an appropriate procurement under
assistance agreement requirement.
Section 33.00^b) Definition of
architectural or engineering services.
The issues were whether the
definition of "architectural or
engineering (.A/Ej services" should
include manufacturers and contractors
and be revised to state that providers of
A/E services need not be licensed by
the State. The definition in I 33.0C5fb> is
based on the definition for A/E services
' in the American Bar Association's
"Model Procurement Code for State and
Local Governments*" end section 2 of the
American Society of Civil Engineers'
Manual 45. Because EPA's definition is
based on the dsfinitions in these widely
accepted reference documents, we do
not believe the definition should be
changed.
Section 33.525 Optional procedure for
negotiation and award of a
subagreementfor architectural and
engineering services,
The issue was whether to eliminate
the words "architectural and
engineering." This section implements
an option to the competitive negotiation
process under OMB Circular A-102.
Attachment O. which expressly limited
the option to the procurement of A/E
services. Therefore, EPA believes that a
change to this section is not warranted.
Regulation Development Process
Under Executive Order 12291. EPA
must judge whether a regulation is
"major" and. therefore, subject to the
regulatory impact analysis requirements
of the Order or whether it may follow
other development procedures. We
determined that this regulation is not
"major" because it will not have a
substantial impact on the economy.
Consequently, the regulation is not
subject to the impact analysis
requirements of Executive Order 12291.
Information collection requirements
contained in § 33.110 bave been
approved by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act oi 1930
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seg.) and have been
assigned OMB control number 2000-
0453.
The information provisions in | 33.211
"Recipient reporting requirements" and
the requirement in 133.420(f).
5 33.5lO(b) and § 33.1016 to use EPA
Form 5720-4 have been approved by
OMB under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44
U S C. 3501 et seq.) and have been
assigned OMB control number 2030-
0004.
This regulation was submitted to
OMB for review as required by
Executive Order 12291.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 33
Advertising. Conflict of interest.
Environmental protection. Grams
programs—Environmental protection.
C-5
-------
12926 Federal Register / Vol. 46. No. 60 / Monday. March 28. 1983 / Rules and Regulations
. Dated: March 11.1983.
hEW.HemandM.lt,
,-ictJng Administrator.
Accordingly, Title 40 Chapter I is
amended by revising Pajt 33 to read aa
follows:
PART 33-PROCUREMENT UNDER
ASSISTANCE AGREEMENTS
33.001 Applicability and scope of this part
33.005 Definitions.
Subpart A--Procurenwnt System
Evaluation
33.105 Applicability and scope of this
subpart
33.110 Applicant aad recipient certification.
33.115 Procurement system review.
Subpart 0 Procurement Raqulr»m«noi
33JOS Applicability and scope of this
subpart
3&210 Recipient responsibility.
33.211 Recipient reporona requirements.
gagy> Limitation on subagreement award.
33.225 Violations.
33.230 Competition.
33.235 Profit
33MO Small, minority, women's, and labor
surplus area businesses.
33.245 Privity of subagreement
33.250 Documentation.
33.255 Specifications.
33.280 Intergovernmental agreements.
33.285 Bonding and insurance.
33.270 Code of conduct
33.275 Federal cost principles.
33780 Payment to consultants.
33~285 Prohibited types of subagreements.
33-290 Cost and price considerations.
33.295 Subagreements awarded by a
contractor.
Small Purchase*
33.305 Small purchase procurement.
33410 Small purchase procedures.
33.315 Requirements for competition.
Fonnai Advertising
33.405 Formal advertising procurement
method.
33.410 Public notice and solicitation of bids.
33.415 Time for preparing bids.
33.420 Adequate bidding documents.
33.425 Public opening of bids.
33.430 Award to lowest responsive,
responsible bidder.
CorapetitSvB Negotiation
33.505 Competitive negotiation procurement
method.
33410 Public notice.
33.515 Evaluation of proposals.
33.520 Negotiation and award of
subagreement
33.525 Optional selection procedure for
negotiation and award of subagreements
for architectural and engineering
services.
NoncompettHve Negotiation
33.605 Noncompetitive negotiation
procurement method.
Subpart C—Requirements for Rwtoitfita of
A*»l*tanc* Agreement* for Construction of
Treatment Works
Sec.
33.705 Applicability and scope of this
•ubpart.
33.no Buy American.
33.715 Use of the same architect or engineer
during construction.
Subpart 0-Rwpiinnwrrt* for Institutions
of Higher Education and Other Nonprofit
Organizations
33.806 Applicability and scope of this
subpart
33J10 Nonappticable subagreement clauses.
33J15 Nonapplicable procurement
provisions.
33.820 Additional procurement
requirements.
Subpart E—Requirements for Redstart* of
Remedial Action Cooperative Agreement*
Under th» Comprehenalve Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
Of 1980
33 JOS Applicability and scope of this
subpart
33.910 Preference for formal advertising.
33J1S Award official approval
Subpart F—Subaqreetnent Provisions
33.1005 Applicability and scope of this
subpart
33.1010 Requirements for subagreement
clauses.
33.1015 Subagreement provisions clause.
33.1016 Labor standards provisions.
33.1019 Patents, data and copyrights clause.
33.1020 Violating facilities clause.
33.1021 Energy efficiency clause.
33.1030 Model subagreement clauses.
Sufapait Q - Protests
33.1105 Applicability and scope of thin
subpart
33.1110 Recipient protest procedures.
33.1115 Protest appeal
33.1120 Limitations on protest appeals.
33.1125 Filing requirements.
33.1130 Review of protest appeals.
33.1140 Deferral of procurement action.
33.1145 Award official's review.
Appendix A—Procedural Requirements for
Recipients Who Do Not Certify Their
Procurement Systems, or for Recipients .
Who Have Their Procurement
Certifications Revoked by EPA
Authority- 7 U.S.C. 138 et seq.: 15 U.S.C.
2501 et seq.; 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq; 42 U.S.C
241, 242b, 243. 246, 300H. 300J-2.300J-3.1857
et seq.. 6901 et seq.; and 42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.
533,001 Applicability and scope of this
Part
(a) This part applies to all assistance
agreements awarded on or after the
effective date of this part For assistance
agreements awarded before the
effective date, this part will apply only
to those procurement actions initiated
by the recipient on or alter the date the
recipient complies with the self-
certification requirements in 5 33.110 of
this part. ,
(b) This pan:
. (1) Describes EPA's procurement
system evaluation process.
(2) Identifies the minimum
requirements for the procurement of
supplies, services, and construction
under EPA assistance agreements.
(3) Identifies an additional
specification requirement for
procurement under assistance
agreements for the construction of
treatment works awarded under 40 CFR
Part 35, Subparts E and L
(4) Identifies the procurements
standards that institutions of higher
education and other nonprofit
organization* must follow.
(5) Identifies the provisions that
recipients of EPA assistance agreements
must include in their subagreements.
(6) Describes the procedures that EPA
will use to handle protest appeals
concerning the award of a subagreement
by the recipient of an EPA assistance
agreement
(c) This Part does not apply to work
beyond the scope of the project for
which an assistance agreement is
awarded (i.e.. ineligible work].
(d) This part does not apply to
expenses for services for which the
recipient will receive an allowance or a
potential recipient will receive an
advance of an allowance under 40 CFR
Part 35, Subpart L
(eJThis part supplements the
requirements in:
(!) 40 CFR Part 30 "General
Regulation for Assistance Programs,"
and
(2) 40 CFR Part 32. "Debarments and
Suspensions under EPA Assistance
Programs."
(f) The following types of recipients
must comply with the specified subparts
in this part
(1) Recipients of assistance
agreements for the construction of
treatment works awarded under 40 CFR
Part 35, Subparts E and I. must follow
the requirements in Subparts A, B, C, F
andG.
(2) Recipients of remedial action
cooperative agreements under the
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, Liability Act
of 1980 (Superfund 42 U.S.C. 6901 et
seq.) must follow the requirements in
Subparts A. B. E. F and G.
(3) State and local government
recipients forothf r than construction
grants and CERCLA remedial action
cooperative agreements must follow the
requirements in Subparts A, B, F and G.
(4) Institutions of higher education,
hospitals, and other nonprofit
organizations must follow the
requirements in Subparts A. B, D and C.
C-6
-------
Federal Register / Vol. 48, No. 60 / Monday. March 28, 1SB3 / Rules and Regulations 12927
*>:
\
the construction of treatment
program under the Clean Water
U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), it is EPA's
policy to delegate determinations on
individual projects to State agencies to
the maximum extent possible (see 40
CFR Part 35, Subpart F). This Part uses
the term "award official." To the extend.
that the award official for a treatment
works assistance agreement delegates
responsibility for determining
compliance with the requirements of this
Part (except for \ 33.115 "Procurement
system review," §33.211 "Recipient
reporting requirements" and Subpart G
"Protests") to a State agency under a
delegation agreement (40 CFR 35.1130),
the term ''award official" may be read
"State agency."
(h] This Part applies to a grant
awarded under 40 CFR Part 35 Subpart
E only if the recipient elects to follow
the requirements in this Part If the
recipient of a Subpart E grant does not
elect to follow the requirements in this
Part, it is subject to the procurement
requirements in 40 CFR Subpart E.
S 33.005 Definitions.
(a) Words and terms not defined
below shall have the meaning given to
tin 40 CFR Part 30 and 40 CFR Part
^R*
I As used in this part, the following
wcrds and terms mean:
Architectural or engineering (A/E)
services. Consultation, investigations;
reports, or services for deaign-tvpe
projects within the scope of the practice
of architecture or professional
engineering as defined by the laws of the
State or territory in which the recipient
is located.
Construction. Erection, building,
alteration, remodeling, improvement, or
extension of buildings, structures or
pthar property. Construction also
includes remedial actions in response to
a release, or a threat of a release, of a
hazardous substance into the
environment as determined by the
Comprehensive Environmental
Response. Compensation, and Liability
Act of 1980.
Contractor. Any party to whom a
recipient awards a subagreenect
Cost analysis. The review and
evaluation of each element of
subagreement cost to determine
reasonableness, aliocabiiity and
ailowability.
tergovernmextal Agreement. Any
agreement between units of
ent under which one public
ncy performs duties for or in concert
with another public agency using EPA
assistance. This includes substate and
interagency agreements.
Minority Business Enterprise, A
minority business enterprise is a
business which is: (1) Certified as
socially and economically
disadvantaged by the Small Business
Administration, (2) certified as a
minority business enterprise by a State
or Federal agency, or (3) an independent
business concern which is at least 51
percent owned and controlled by
minority group roembeifs). A minority
group member is an individual who is a
citizen of the United States and one of
the following:
(1) Black American:
(ii) Hispanic American (with origins
from Puerto Rico, Mexico. Cuba, South
or Central America);
(iii) Native American (American
Indian. Eskimo, Aleut, native Hawaiian],
or
(iv) Asian-Pacific American (with
origins from Japan, China, the
Philippines, Vietnam. Korea, Samoa,
Guam, the U.S. Trust Territories of the
Pacific, Northern Marianas, Laos,
Ombodia, Taiwan or the Indian
subcontinent).
Price analysis. The process of
evaluating a prospective price without
regard to the contractor's separate cost
elements and proposed profit Price
analysis determines the reasonableness
of the proponed subagreement price
baaed on adequate price competition.
previous experience with similar work,
established catalog or market price, law,
or regulation.
Profit. The net proceeds obtained by
deducting all allowable costs (direct and
indirect) from the price. (Because this
definition of profit is based on
applicable Federal cost principles, it
may vary from many firms' definition of
profit and may correspond to those
firms' definition of "fee.")
Services. A contractor's labor, time, or
efforts which do not involve the delivery
of a specific end item, other than
documents, (e.g., reports, design
drawing, specifications). This term does
not include employment agreements or
collective bargaining agreemects.
Small business. A business as defined
in Section 3 of the Small Business Act
as amended (15 U.S.C. 632).
Subagreement. A written agreement
between an EPA recipient sad another
party (other than another public agency)
and any lower tier agreement for
sen-ices, supplies, or construction
necessary to complete the project
Subagreements include contracts and
subcontracts for personal and
professional services, agreements with
consultants, and purchase orders.
Supplies. AH property, including
equipment materials, printing,
insurances and leases of real property,
but excluding land or a permanent
interest in land.
Women's Business Enterprise. A
women's business enterprise ii a
business which is certified as such by a
State or Federal agency, or which meets
the following definition: A women's
business enterprise is an independent
business concern which is at least 51
percent owned by a women or women
who also control and operate it
Determination of whether a business is
at least 51 percent owned by a woman
or women shall be made without regard
to community property laws. For
example, an otherwise qualified WBE
which is 51 percent owned by a married
woman in a community property state
will not be disqualified because her
husband has a 50 percent interest in her
share. Similarly, a business which is 51
percent owned by a married n"sn and 49
percent owned by an unmarried woman
will not become a qualified WBE by
virtue of his wife's 50 percent interest in
his share of the business.
Subpart A—Procurement System
Evaluation
933.109 Applicability and scope of this
•ubpart
(a) This subpart applies to all
recipients of EPA assistance
agreements.
(b) For procurements involving EPA
funds, recipients shall use their own
procurement ooiicies and procedures if
those policies and procedures reflect
applicable Federal. State, and local laws
and regulations, and at least meet the
requirements set forth in this part.
(c) This subpart describes when EPA
will review the recipient's procurement
practices.
S 33.110 Applicant and recipient
certification.
(*} It is the applicant's and recipient's
responsibility to evaluate its own
procurement system and to determine
whether its system meets the applicable
requirements in this part [sen- § 33.001).
(b) A-'ier evaluating its procurement
system, the applicant or recipient will
complete the "Procurement System
Certification" (EPA Form 5700-J8}. The
applicant or recipient will either certify
that
(1) Its system will meet the intent of
all the requirements in this part before
any procurement action with EPA
assistance is undertaken, or
(2) Its current system does not meet
the intent of the requirements of this
part and, therefore, the applicant will
follow the requirements of 4fi CFR Part
33 and allow EPA preaward review of
proposed procurement actions that will
C-7
-------
12928 Federal Register / Vol. 48. No. 60 / Monday. March 28. 1983 / Rules and Regulations
use EPA funds. The additional
requirements for EPA review and '
approval are contained in Appendix A
to this part.
(c) The applicant must submit the
signed certification form with the
assistance application to the award
official
(d) The certification will be valid for
two years or for the length of the project
period specified in the assistance
agreement, whichever is greater, unless
the recipient substantially revises its
procurement system or the award
official determines that the recipient is
not following the intent of the
requirements in this part (see
S 33.115(b)J. If the recipient substantially
revises its procurement system, the
recipient must re-evaluate its system
and submit a revised EPA Form 5700-48.
(e) Even when a recipient certifies its
procurement system, the EPA award
official retains the authority stated in:
(1) Section 33.210(h) -Recipient's
procurement responsibilities," which
requires the recipient to receive the
award official's prior written approval if
the recipient wants to use an innovative
procurement method.
(2) Section 33.211 "Recipient reporting
requirements," which requires the
award official to notify tie Department
of Labor of certain construction
subagreement awards, and obtain all
bid or offer tabulations,
(3) Section 33.605(d) "Noncompetitive
negotiation." to authorize a
noncompetitive award.
(4] Section 33JB20(b) "Additional
procurement requirements." which
requires the award official's prior
approval for a sole source award over
$10,000 by an institute of higher
education or other nonprofit
organization.
(5) Section 33.915 "Award official
approval," which requires the award
official to approve the recipient's use of
a procurement method other than formal
advertising for a Superfund remedial
action award, and
(6) Subpart G "Protests."
} 33.115 Procurement system review.
(a) EPA will not substitute its
judgment for that of the recipient unless
the matter is primarily a Federal
concern.
(b) Even if a recipient has a certified
procurement system, EPA reserves the
right to review a recipient's procurement
system or procurement action under an
assistance agreement
(1) To determine if the recipient is
following the procurement requirements
in this part: or
(2) When there is sufficient reason to
believe that the recipient's system may
be unacceptable based om
(i) Information concerning the review
or certification of the recipient's
procurement system or actions by other
Federal agencies or Congress;
(it] Information from the recipient's
cognizant audit agency;
(iii) Information from State agencies
and organizations independent of the
recipient's procurement activity;
(iv) Recipient responses to the
procurement system certification form;
(v] Previous EPA experience with the
recipient; or
(vi) Information from contractors or
prospective contractors.
(c) If the award official determines
that the recipient Is not following the
procurement requirements it certified it
would follow, the award official shall
revoke the recipient's certification and:
(1) Require that the recipient follow
the procurement requirements in this
part, including Appendix A. for future
procurement actions and. if appropriate,
(2) Apply the sanctions in 40 CFR Part
30.
(d) The recipient may recertify its
procurement system if it shows the
award official that it has corrected the
procurement deficiencies noted by the
award official and the award official
accepts the recertification.
Subpart B—Procurement
Requirements
93&305 AppOcaMltty and scope of mto
subpart
This subpart contains:
(a] The recipient's and EPA's
responsibilities, and
(b) The minimum procurement
standards for each recipient's
procurement system.
§3M10 Recipient rMponslbtUty.
(a) The recipient is responsible for the
settlement and satisfactory completion
in accordance with sound business
judgment and good administrative
practice of all contractual and
administrative issues arising out of
subagreements entered into under the
assistance agreement This includes
issuance of invitations for bids or
requests for proposals, selection of
contractors, award of subagreements.
settlement of protests, claims, disputes
and other related procurement matters.
lb) The recipient shall maintain a
subagreement administration system to
assure that contractors perform in
accordance with the terms, conditions
and specifications of their
subagreements.
(c) The recipient shall review its
proposed procurement actions to' avc
purchasing unnecessary or dupli
items.
(d) The recipient shall conside:
consolidating its procurement or
dividing it into parts to obtain a more
economical purchase.
(e) Where appropriate, the recipient
shall make an analysis of lease versus
purchase alternative* in its procurement
actions.
(f) A recipient of a remedial action
cooperative agreement awarded under
the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act of 1980 must obtain the EPA award
official's approval to use a procurement
method other than the formal
advertising method (see Subpart E).
(g) A recipient may request technical
and legal assistance from the award
official for the administration and
enforcement of any subagreement
awarded under this Part. However, such
assistance does not relieve the recipient
of its responsibilities under this Part
(h] A recipient may use innovative
procurement methods or procedures
only if it receives the award officials'
prior written approval.
93&211 R»clpt«nt reporting r«qutr«m«frt»
Recipients shall notify the awslfeL .
official in writing, of each con^^p )>n
subagreement which has or is exalted
to have an aggregate value over $10.000
within a 12-month period. The recipient
shall notify the award official within tei
(10) calendar days after the award of
each construction subagreement The
notice shall include:
(a) Name, address, telephone numbei
and employee identification number of
the construction contractor,
(b) Amount of .the award,
(c) Estimated starting and completio:
dates.
(d) Project number, name and site
location of the project and
(e) Copy of the tabulations of bids o:
offerers and the name of each bidder c
offerer.
§ 33.220 Limitation of subagraemefit
•ward.
(a) The recipient shall award
subagreeaents only to responsible
contractors that possess the potential
ability to perform successfully under t
terms and conditions of a proposed
procurement. A responsible contracto
is one that has:
(1) Financial resources, technical
qualifications, experience, dtf^tati'
and facilities adequate to c^lPlt t
project, or a demonstrated ablfiry to
obtain these;
C-8
-------
Federal Register / Vol. 48. No. 60 / Monday. March 28. 1983 / Rules and ftegi. :ions 12929
(2] Resources to meet the completion
schedule contained in the subagreement;
(3] A satisfactory performance record
for completion of subagreements;
(4) Accounting and auditing
procedures adequate to central property,
funds and assets, as required in this Part
and 40 CFR Part 30; and
(5) Demonstrated compliance or
willingness to comply with the civil
rights, equal employment opportunity,
labor law and other statutory
requirements under 40 CFR Part 30.
(b) The recipient shall not make
awards to contractors who have been
suspended, debarredor voluntarily
excluded under 40 CFR Part 32 nor shall
it permit any portion of the work
required by the subagreement to be
performed at any facility listed on the
EPA List of Violating Facilities (see 40
CFR Part 15).
{3&33S Vtotetto**.
The recipient shall refer violations of
law to the local State or Federal
authority with jurisdiction over the
matter (see 1 30.810).
§31230 Comoctmon.
(a) The redolent shall conduct all
procurement transactions in a manner
that provides maximum open and free
competition.
(b) Procurement practices shall not
unduly restrict or eliminate competition.
Example* of practices considered to be
unduly restrictive include:
(1) Nonomoetitive practices between
firms;
(2) OrgenitationaJ conflicts of interest;
(3) Unnecessary experience and
bonding requirements;
(4) State or local laws, ordinances,
regulations or procedures which give
local or in-State bidders or proposers
preference over other bidders or
proposers in evaluating bids or
proposals', or
(5] Placing unreasonable requirements
on firms in order for them to qualify to
do business.
IK) The recipient may use a
prequalification list(s) of persons, firms
or products if it
(1) Updates its prequalified list(s) at
least every six months;
(2) Reviews and acts on each request
for prequalification made more than 30
days before the dosing date for receipt
of proposals or bid opening; and
(3) Gives adequate public notice of its
preauftlificatipn procedure in
accordance with the public notice
procedures in § 33.410 or I 33.510.
(d) A recipient may not use a
prequalified Hst(s) of persons or firms if
the procedure unnecessarily restricts
competition. However, this restriction
does not apply to 5 33.525 "Optior.nl
selection procedure for negotiation and
award of subagreements for
architectural and engineering services."
J3&23S Profit
(a) Recipients must assure that only
fair and reasonable profits are paid to
contractors awarded subagreements
under EPA assistance agreements.
(b) The recipient shall negotiate profit
as a separate element of price for each
subagreement in which there is no price
competition, or where price is baaed on
cost analysis.
(c) Where the recipient receives two
or more bids, profit included in a
formally advertised, competitively bid,
fixed price subagreement shall be
considered reasonable.
{d} Off-the-shelf or catalog supplies
are exempt from this section.
(3U40 Small, minority, women'*, and
tabor auralua area buairw****,
(a) It is EPA policy to award a fair
share of subagreements to small,
minority, and women's businesses. The
recipient must take affirmative steps to
assure that small, minority, and
women's businesses are used when
possible as sources of supplies.
construction and services. Affirmative
steps shall include the following:
fl] Including qualified small minority,
and women's businesses on solicitation
lists;
(2) Assuring that small minority, and
women's businesses are solicited
whenever they ore potential sources;
(31 Dividing total requirements, when
economically feasible, into small tasks
or quantities to permit maximum
participation of small minority, and
women's businesses;
(4) Establishing delivery schedules,
where the requirements of the work
permit, which will encourage
participation by small minority, and
women's businesses;
(5) Using the services and assistance
of the Small Business Administration
and the Office of Minority Business
Enterprise of the U.S. Department of
Commerce, as appropriate: and
(8) If the contractor awards
subagreements. requiring the contractor
to take the affirmative steps in
paragraphs (a)(l) through (a)(5) of this
section.
(b) [Reserved}.
(c] EPA encourages recipient)) to
procure supplies and services from labor
surplus area firms.
§31245
Neither EPA nor the United States
shall be a party to any subagreement
nor to any solicitation or request for
proposals.
} 33.250 Documentation.
(a) Procurement records and files for
procurements in excess of $10.000 shall
include the following:
(1) Basis for contractor selection;
(2) Written justification for selection
of the procurement method:
(3) Written justification for use of any
specification which does not provide for
maximum free and open competition;
(4) Written Justification for the type of
subagreement
(5) Basis for award cost or price.
including a copy of the cost or price
analysis made in accordance with
S 33.290 and documentation of
negotiations; and
(6) Written justification for rejecting
bids.
(b] Recipients must state the reasons
for rejecting any or all bids and the
justification for procurements on a
noncompetitiveiy negotiated basis and
make them available for public^
inspection.
93&2S5 Specifications,
(a] Recipients must incorporate In
their specifications a clear and accurate
description of the technical
requirements for the material product or
service to be procured. Such description
shall not, in competitive procurements,
contain features which unduly restrict
competition, unless the features we
necessary to test or demonstrate a
specific thing or to provide for necessary
Interchangeflbility of parts and
equipment cr to promote innovative
technologies. The description shall
include a statement of the qualitative
nature of the material, product or
service to be procured and, when
necessary, shall set forth those minimum
essential characteristics and standards
to which it must conform if it is to
satisfy its intended use.
(b) The recipient shall avoid the use of
detailed product specifications if at all
possible.
(c} When in the judgment of the
recipient it is unpractical or
uneconomical to make a clear and
accurate description of the technical
requirements, recipients may use a
"brand name or equal" description as a
means to define the performance or
other salient requirements of a
procurement The recipient need not
establish the existence of any source
other than the named brand. Recipients
must clearly state in the specification
the salient requirements of the named
brand which must be met by offerers.
(An additional specification *»qufremetr
for recipients of assistance for the
construction of treatment works under
C-9
-------
'12930 Federal Kegfcter / Vol. *&, No. 60 / Monday. March 28. 1963 / Rules and Regulations
40 CFR Part 35, Subparts E and I is
contained in S 33.710.}
§ 33Ł60 lnttn>ov«mment*J agreement*.
(a) To foster greater economy and
efficiency. EPA encourages recipients to
enter into State and local
intergovernmental agreements for
common procurement or use of goods
and services.
(b) Although intergovernmental
agreements are not subject to the
requirements in this part, all
procurements under intergovernmental
agreements are subject to the
requirements in this part except for
procurements that are:
(1] Incidental to the purpose of the
assistance agreement, ant
(2) Made through a central public
procurement unit
} 3X289 BowfnaandbMHnnc*.
(a) These requirements apply only to
recipients and contractors with
subagreements for construction.
(1) For construction subagreements of
$100,000 or less, the recipient shall
follow its own requirements relating to
bid guarantees, performance bonds and
payment bonds.
(2) For those aubagreements more
than $100,000, the award official may
accept the recipient's bonding policy
and requirements provided the award
official makes a determination that the
Federal Government's in*west is
adequately protected. If the award
official does not make that
determination, the mte bonding
requirements for subagreements more
than $100,000 are:
(i) A "bid guarantee" from each
bidder equivalent to five percent of the
bid price. The "bid guarantee" shall
consist of a firm commitment such as a
bid bond, certified check or other
negotiable instrument accompanying a
bid as assurance that the bidder will.
upon acceptance of the bid. execute
such contractual documents as the EPA
recipient may require within the time
specified.
(ii) A "performance bond" for 100
percent of the subagreement price. A
"performance bond" is one that the
contractor executes in connection with a
subagreement to secure fulfillment of all
its obligations under such subagreement
(iii) A "payment bond" for 100 percent
of the subagnwmenl price. A "payment
bond" is one that the contractor
executes in connection with a
subagreement to assure payment as
required by law. to all persons supplying
labor and material in the execution of
thfi work provided for in the
sub"sreement
(3) Where bonds are required ir. the
situations described above, bidders and
. contractors shall obtain them from
companies holding certificaties of
authority as acceptable sureties [31 CFR
P»rt 223).
(b] Recipients and contractors must
follow the flood hazard ares
requirements of the Flood Disaster
Protection Act of 1973 contained in 40
CFR Part 30.
!3&270 Code of conduct
(a) Recipients shall maintain a written
code or standards of conduct which
shall govern the performance of its
officers, employees, or agents engaged
in the award and administration of
subagreements supported by EPA funds.
No employee, officer or agent of the
recipient shall participate ic th*
selection, award or administration of a
subagreement supported by EPA funds if
a conflict of interest, real or apparent
would be involved.
(b) Such a conflict would ari«e when:
(1) Any employee, officer or agent of
the recipient, any member of their
immediate families, or their partners
have a financial or other Interest in the
firm selected for award, or
(2) Aa organization wWrh may
receive or has been awarded a
subagreement employs, or is about to
employ, any person under paragraph
(b)(l) of this section.
(c) The recipient's officers, employees
or agents shall neither ?oHcit nor accept
gratuities, favors or anything of
monetary value from contractors,
potential contractors or other parties to
subagreements.
(d} Recipients may set minimum rules
where the financial interest is not
substantial or the gift is an unsolicited
item of nominal intrinsic value.
(e) To the extent permitted by State or
local law or regulations, the recipient's
code of conduct shall provide for
penalties, sanctions or other disciplinary
actions for violations of the code by the
recipient's officers, employees or agents
or by contractors or their agents.
$3X275 Federal cactprtnelpie*.
_ The following cost principles apply to
assi«tance agreements and
subagreements:
(a) State and local governments must
comply with OMB Circular A-87 to
determine allowable costs.
(b) Educational inatirutions must
comply with OMB Circular A-21 to
determine allowable costs and with
OMB Circular A-88 for indirect cost
rates.
(c) Nonprofit institutions must comply
with OMB Circular A-122 to determine
allowable costs.
(d) All other recipients, contractors
and subcontractor* must cow ply with
the cost principles contained in the
Tederal Procurement Regulation.-! (41
CFS 1-15.2 and. if appropriate. 1-15.4) t
determine allowable cosU.
$3X280 Payment to eoneuttanta.
(a] For all EPA assistance agreements.
EPA will limit its participation in the
salary rate (excluding overhead) paid to
individual consultants retained by
recipients or by a recipient's contractors
or subcontractors to the maximum daily
rate for * GS-lB. (Recipients may.
however, pay contractors and
subcontractors more than this amount.)
This limitation applies to consultation
services of dssimated individuals with
specialized skill-' who are paid at a daily
or hourly rate. This rate t*-jv» not include
transportation and subsistence costs for
travel performed: recipients will pay
tbe«4 ia acc-Tda^ce with their normal
travel reimburses1 percentage-of-cost (e.g..
a multiplier which includes profit) a
the percentage-of-construction-cost
types of subagreements shall not be
used..
93X290 Cost and prte» eomktertfton*.
(a) The recipient shall conduct a cost
analysis of all negotiated char»«e orders
and ail negotiated subagreementa
estimated to exceed $10.000.
• (b) The recipient shall conduct a price
analysis of all formally advertised
procurements sstimated to exceed
SlO.000 if there are fewer than three
bidders.
(c) For negotiated procurement
contractors and subcontractors shall
submit cost or pricing data in support of
their proposals to the recipient.
$3X295 Suttegr
contractor.
Twm> awarded by a
A contractor must comply with the
following provisions in its award of
suhagreements. (This section does not
apply to a supplier's procurement uf
materials to produce equipment.
materials and catalog, off-the-shelf, or
manufactured items.)
(a) 40 CFR Part 32 CDebarment and
Suspension Under EPA Assistance
Programs);
(b) The limitations on subagre»me
award in i 33.220 (a)(l) through (a)(5);
(c) The profit requirements in i 33.235;
C-10
-------
Federal Register / Vol. 48. No. 60 / Monday. March 23. 1983 / Rules and Regulations 12931
be requirements for small.
nriry. women's and labor surplus
I ousinesses in § 33.240:
I The specification requirements of
§ 33.255;
(f) The requirements of Subpart C of
this Part, if appropriate:
(g) The Federal cost principles in
f 33.275:
(h) The prohibited types of
subagreements in 5 33.285;
(I) The cost and price considerations
in i 33.290. and
(j) The applicable stibagreement
provisions in Subpart F of this part.
Small Purchases
} 33JQ5 SmsB purchase procurement
If the aggregate amount involved in
any one procurement transaction does
not exceed $10.000, including estimated
handling and freight charges, overhead
and profit, the recipient may use small
purchase procedures.
SmsB purchase procadurm.
Small purchase procedures are
relatively pimple procurement methods
that are sound and appropriate for a
procurement of services, supplies or
other property coating in the aggregate
it more than $10.000.
11 S Requirements for eomMtttton.
(a) Recipients shall not divide a
procurement into smaller parts to avoid
the dollar limitation for competitive
procurement
(bl Recipients shall obtain price or
rate quotation* from an adequate
number of qualified sources.
Forma! Advertising
§ 33.405 Formal advertising procurement
(a) The requirements in § 5 33.405
through 33.430 apply to all formally
advertised subagreements in excess of
$10.000. Formal advertising means the
public solicitation of sealed bids and the
award of a subasreemem based on a
fixed price (lump sum, unit price, or a
combination of the two} to the lowest
responsive, responsible bidder.
(b) Formal advertising requires at a
minimum:
(1J A complete, adequate and realistic
specification m purchase description of
what is required:
(2) Two or more responsible bidders
which are willing and able to compete
effectively for the recipient's business;
VA procurement that lends itself to
award of a fixed-price
agreement: a«d
(4) That the selection of the successful
bidder be made principally on the basis
of price.
§ 33.4 10 Public notice and solicitation cf
bids.
The recipient shall give adequate
public notice of the solicitation, inviting
bids and stating when and how the
bidding documents may be obtained or
examined.
$33.415 Tim* for preparing bids.
The recipient must allow adequate
time between the date the public notice
is first published and the date by which
bids must be submitted.
53X420 Adequate bidding documents.
Recipient's bidding documents shall
include:
(a) A complete statement of work to
be performed including, where
appropriate, design drawings and
specifications and the required
performance schedu)*;
(b) The terms and conditions of the
subagreement to be awarded, including
payment, delivery schedules, point of
delivery and acceptance criteria;
(c) A dear explanation of the
recipient's mR'hod of bidding and the
method of evaluating bid prices, and its
basis and met^d for awarding the
subagreement:
(d) Any niher responsibility
requirements or evaluation criteria
which the recipient will use in
evaluating bidders;
(e) The prevailing wage
determination, made under the Davis-
Bacon Act if applicable; and
(f) The deadline and place to submit
bids and a copy of I 33.295. Subparts F
and C aM. if appropriate. EPft Form
5720-4 "Labor Standard Provisions for
Federally Assisted Contracts,"
§33.0$ ruMe coming of bids.
The recipient shall publicly open bids
at the place, date and time announced in
the bidding documents.
I 33.430 Award to the lowest, responsive,
responsible bidder.
(a] The recipient shall evaluate all
bids in accordance with the methods
and criteria in the bidding documents.
(b) The recipient shall award a fixed*
price subagreement to the lowest
resconsive, responsible bidder. Where
specified in the bidding documents,
recipients shall consider factors such as
discounts, transportation costs and life
cycle costs to determine the low bid.
Payments discounts may be used to
determine the low bid only when prior
experience of the recipient indicates
that it generally accepts such discounts.
(c) The recipient may reject ail bids
only when it has sound, documented
business reasons which are in the best
interest of th- program for whtch EPA
Oil
assistance is awarded (see § .33 250
"Documentation").
Competitive Negotiation
J 33.505 Competitive negotiation
procurement method.
(a) The requirements in § § 33.505
through 33.525 apply to-«ll competitively
negotiated subagreements in excess of
$10.000.
(b) Recipients may use competitive
negotiation only if conditions are not
appropriate for the use of the formal
advertising method of procurement (see
$ 33.405).
§33.510 PwWIc notice.
(a] The recipient must give adequate
public notice for competitively
negotiated procurements,
(b) The notice of a request for
proposals must state how to obtain
associated documents, including a copy
of § 33.295, Subparts F and G, the basis
for 3ubagrserr<<»nt award, and, if
appropriate, EPA Form 5720-4 "Labor
Standard Provisions for Federally
Assisted Contracts.'*
(c) Requests for proposals must be
written, contain enough information to
enable a prospective offerer to prepare a
proposal, contain all evaluation criteria
ard th* relative importance attached to
each, and clearly state the deadline and
place to submit proposals.
§ 33.515 Evaluation of propowtis.
(a) Recipients must uniformly and
objectively evaluate all proposals
submitted in response to the request for
proposals-
fb) Recipients must base their
determinations of qualified offerers and
acceptable proposals solely on 'he
evaluation criteria stated in the request
for proposals,
$ 33.520 Negotiation and award of
subaqreefneflt
(a) Unless the request for proposals
states that award may be based yn
ioitiai offers alone, the recipient must
conduct meaningful negotiations with
the best qualified offerers with
acceptable proposals within the
competitive range, and permit revisions
lo obtain bpst .ITK? *inal offers. The best
qualified offerers must have equal
opportunities to negotiate or revise their
proposals. During negotiations, the
recipient must not disclose the indentity
of competing offerers or any information
front competing proposals.
(b) The recipient must award the
subagreement to the responsible offeror
whose proposal is determined in writing
to be the most advantageous to the
recipient, taking into consideration price
-------
12932 Federal Register / Vol. 48, No. 60 / Monday. March 28. 1983 / Rulea and Regulations
and other evaluation criteria set forth in
the request for proposal.
(c) The recipient must promptly notify
unsuccessful offerers that their
proposals were refected.
(d) The recipient must document its
procurement file to indicate how
proposals were evaluated, what factors
were used to determine the best
qualified offerers within the competitive
range, and what factors were used to
determine th« subagreement award.
§3&52S Opttonaf selection procedursfor
negotiation and swud of subsgresnunts
for architectural vnd engineering services*
(a) The recipient may evaluate and
select an architect or engineer using the
procedures in this section in place of the
procedures la \ 33.520. "Negotiation and
award of subagreementa."
(b) The recipient may use either a
Disqualified list developed in
accordance with § 33.230{c] or
responses to requests for statement of
qualifications to determine the most
technically qualified architects or
engineers.
(c) After selecting and ranking the
most qualified architects or engineers,
the recipient will request technical
proposals from those architects or
engineers and inform them of the
evaluation criteria the recipient will use'
to rank the proposals.
(d} The recipient shall then select and
determine, in writing, the best technical
proposal.
(e) After selecting the best proposal,
the recipient shall attempt to negotiate
fair pnd reasonable compensation with .
that offerer..
(f) If the recipient and the offerer of
the best proposal cannot agree on the
amount of compensation, the recipient
shall formally terminate negotiations
with that offerer. The recipient shall
then negotiate with the offerer with the
next best proposal. This process will
continue until the recipient reaches
agreement on compensation with an
offerer with an acceptable proposal.
Once the recipient terminates
negotiations with an offerer, the
recipient cannot go back and renegotiate
with that offerer.
Noncompetitive Negotiation
$33.805 Moncompettttva negotiation
procurement method.
Recipients may use noncompetitive
negotiation to award a subagreement if
the other three procurement methods are
inappropriate because:
(a) The item is available only from a
single source;
(b) A public exigency or emergency
exists and the urgency for tha
requirement will not permit a delay
incident to competitive procurement;
(c) After solicitation from a number of
sources, competition is inadequate; or
(d) The EPA award official authorizes
noncompetitive negotiation, subject to
the limitation in $ 33.715(a}(2).
Subpart C—Requirements for
Recipients of Assistance Agreements
for the Construction of Treatment
Works
133.705 Appfaabffity end aeope ol this
•ubpart
Recipients of assistance agreements
awarded under 40 CFR Part 35, Subparts
E and I must comply with the" following
requirements.
{33.710 Buy American.
Section 215 of the Clean Water Act
requires that contractors give preference
for the use of domestic material in the
construction of EPA funded treatment
works.
(a) Contractors must use domestic
construction material in preference to
nondomestic material if it is priced no
more than B percent higher than the bid
or offered price of the nondomestic
material, including all costs of delivery
to the construction site and any
applicable duty, whether or not
assessed. The recipient will normally
base the computations on prices and
costs in effect on the date of opening of
bids or proposals.
(b] The award official may waive the
Buy American provision based upon
factors he considers relevant including;
(1) Such use is not in the public
interest;
(2) The cost is unreasonable;
(3) The Agency's available resources
are not sufficient to implement the
provision, subject to the Deputy
Administrator's concurrence;
(4) The articles, materials or supplies
of the class or kind to be used or the
articles, materials or supplies from
which they are manufactured are not
mined, produced or manufactured in the
United States in sufficient and
reasonably available commercial
quantities or satisfactory quality for the
particular project: or
(5) Application of this provision is
contrary to multilateral government
procurement agreements, subject to the
Deputy Administrator's concurrence.
(c) All bidding documents.
subagreements. and. if appropriate,
requests for proposals must contain the
"Buy American" provision in $ 33.1030.
$33.715 Useoftheswnedrchltectar
engineer during construction.
(a) If the recipient is satisified with
thn Qualifications and performance of
the architect or engineer who provided
any or all of the facilities planning or
design services for the project and
wishes to retain that firm or individu
during construction of the project, it
do so without further public notice and
evalution of qualifications, provided:
[1] The recipient received a facilities
planning (Step 1} or design grant (Step
2}. and selected the architect or engineer
in accordance with EPA's procurement
regulations in effect when EPA awarded
the grant or
(2) The award official approves
noncompetitive procurement under
$ 33.605(d) for reasons other than simply
using the same individual or firm that
provided facilities planning or design
services for the project; or
(3) The recipient attests that
(i) The initial request for proposals
clearly stated the possibility that the
firm or individual selected could be
awarded a subagreement for services
during construction; and
(ii) The firm or individual was
selected for facilities planning or design
services in accordance with procedures
in:
(A) Section 33.230 "Competition."and
(B) Section 33^50(»)(1). (a){2] & (a)(3),
and (b) "Documentation." and one of the
following:
(C} Section 33405 through 33.315
"Small Purchases," or
(D) Section 33.405 through 33.430 .
"Formal Advertising;"or
(E] Section 33.505 through 33.525
"Competitive Negotiation."
(iii) No employee, officer or agent of
the recipient, any member of their
immediate families, or their partners
have financial or other interest in the
firm selected for award; and
(iv) None of the recipient's officers,
employees or agents solicited or
accepted gratuities, favors or anything
of monetary value from contractors or
other parties to subagreements.
(b) However, if the recipient uses the
procedures to paragraph (a) to retain an
architect or engineer, any Step 3
subagreements between the architect or
engineer and the recipient must meet all
of the other procurement provisions in
this part
Subpart 0—Requirements for
Institutions of Higher Education and
Other Nonprofit Organizations
533*05 Applicability and scope of this
subpart
Recipients who are subject to the
provisions of OMB Circular A-110,
"Grants and Agreements with
Institutions of Hishsr Education,
Hospitals, and Other Nonprofit
C-12
-------
Federal Register / Vol. 48. No. 60 / Monday. March 23, 1963 / Rules and Regulations 12933
_janizationa" are Dot subject to all of
t ^Bquirementa in this part
§ 33.810 NoftappflcaMe subaoreement
The following clauses in Subpart F of
this part do not apply to institutions of
higher education and other nonprofit
organizations:
(a] Energy efficiency (§ 33,1024):
(b) Changes (3 33.1030,3);
(c) Differing site conditions
(S 33.1030.4): and
(d) Price reduction for defective cost
or pricing data (8 33.1030,8).
S 33J1S NonappttcaMe procurement
provision*.
The following procurement provisions
do not apply to institutions of higher
education and other nonprofit
organizations:
(a) Subparts C and &
(b] Sections 33.405 through 33.430
"Formal advertising:"
(c) Sections 33 JOS through 33.525
"Competitive negotiation;"
(d) Section 33.605 "Noncompetitive
«"atfonM (see S 33.820(b));
"he requirement in § 33.270{a)
of conduct" to have a written
code of conduct:
(f) The provisions of 5 33-240 "Small
minority, women's, and labor surplus
area businesses" which:
(1) Encourage the award of a fair
share of contracts to women's and labor
surplus area businesses;
(2) Require the specific affirmative
action steps in S 33.240(a)(l) through
(a){6); however, nonprofit organizations
are required to make positive efforts to
use small businesses and minority
owned businesses as sources of supplies
and services;
(g) Subpart G "Protests."
§ 33420 Additional procurement
requirements.
(a) Recipients must exclude
contractors that develop or draft
specifications, requirements, statements
of work, invitation for bids, or requests
for proposals from competing for awards
resulting from the prior effort
(b) For all proposed sole source
subagreements and where only one bid
posal is received, the recipient
t request the award official's prior
. ...roval to award the subagreement if
rhi aggregate expenditure is expected to
exceed $10,000.
Subpart E—Requirements for
Recipients of Remedial Action
Cooperative Agreements Under the
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act of 1980
§33.905 Applicability and scop* o! this
subpart
(a) The requirements in 55 33.910
through 33.915 apply only to remedial
actions which EPA funds as part of a
cooperative agreement under the
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability •
Act of 1980 iSuperfund).
(b) Studies, investigations, or
engineering activities which precede a
remedial action activity are not subject
to the requirements in §5 33.910 through
33.915. but are subject to the
requirements in Subparts A. B, F and G
of this part
§33.910 Preference for formal
advertising.
If a recipient wants to use a
procurement method other than formal
advertising, it must receive the EPA
award official's concurrence with the
determination.
§33J1S Award official approval.
The award official shall approve the
recipient's use of a procurement method
other than formal advertising only after
the recipient has completed planning
remedial activities and selected a cost-
effective alternative.
Subpart F—Subagreement Provisions
§32.1005 Applicability and scop* of this
suboart
(a} This subpart applies to all EPA
recipients and describes the minimum
content of each subagreement (contract
and subcontract).
(b) Nothing in this subpart prohibits a
recipient from requiring more
assurances, guarantees, or indemnity or
other contractural requirements from
any party to-a subagreement
§ 33.1010 Requirement* for iiihnjjrnnmnnt
clause*.
Recipients shall include clauses that
meet the requirements of 55 33.1015
through 33.1021. and the appropriate
clauses in 5 33.1030, in each •
procurement subagreement
§33.1015 Subagrwm*nt provisions
(c] Total cost of the subagreement:
and
(d) Payment provisions.
§ 33.1016 tabor standards provisions.
Recipients shall include a copy of EPA
Form 5720-4 "Labor Standards
Provisions for Federally Assisted
Construction Contracts" in each
subagreement for construction (as
defined by the Secretary of Labor). The
form contains the Davis-Bacon Act
requirements (40 U.S.C. 276a—276a-7);
the Copeland Regulations (29 CFR Part
3); the Contract Work Hours and Safety
Standards Act—Overtime
Compensation (940 U.S.C. 327-333) and
the nondiscrimination provisions in
Executive Order 11246. as amended.
§ 33.1019 Patents data and copyrights
Each subagreement must include
provisions defining a sound and
complete agreement including the:
(a) Nature, scope, and extent of work
to be performed;
(b] Timeframe for performance;
Except for construction grant
subagreements, all subagreements shall
include notice of EPA requirements and
regulations pertaining to reporting and
patent rights under any subagreement
involving research, developmental,
experimental or demonstration work
with respect to any discovery or
invention which arises or is developed
in the conduct of work under a
subagreement This notice shall also
include EPA requirements and
regulations pertaining to copyrights and
rights in data contained in 40 CFR Part
30.
§33.1020 Violating facilities clause.
Subagreements in excess of Ł100,000 *'
shall contain a provision which requires
contractor compliance with all
applicable standards, orders or
requirements issued under Section 306
of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 1857(h))L
Section 508 of the Clean Water Act (33
U.S.C. 1368), Executive Order 11738, and
EPA regulations (40 CFR Part 15) which
prohibit the use under nonexempt
Federal contracts, grants or loans of
facilities included on the EPA List of
Violating Facilities.
§33.1021 Energy efficiency cJause.
Subugreements shall comply with
mandatory standards and policies on
energy efficiency contained in the
State's energy conservation plan issued
in compliance with the Energy Policy
and Conservation Act (Pub. L. 94-163).
§33.1030 Model subaerewnent clause*.
Recipients must include, when
appropriate, the following clauses or
their equivalent in each subagreement
Recipients may substitute other terms
for "recipient and" "contractor" in their
subagreement.i.
C-13
-------
12934 Federal Register / Vol. 48. No. 60 / Monday. March 28, 1983 / Rules and Regulations
1. Supanmsion
The recipient and the contractor agree that
this and other appropriate clauses in 40 CFR
33.1030 apply to that work eligible for EPA
assistance to be performed under this
subagreement and that these clause
supersede any conflicting provisions of this
subagreement
2. Privity of Subagreement
This subagreement is expected to be
funded in part with funds from the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency. Neither
the United States nor any of its departments.
agencies or employees is, or will be. a party
to this subagreement or any lower tier
subagreement This subagnement is subject
to regulations contained in 40 CFR Part 33 in
effect on the date of the assistance award for
this project
3. Changes
(a) The following clause applies only to
subagnemeats for construction. (1) The
recipient may at any time, without notice to
any surety, by written order designated or
indicated to be a change order, make any
Chang* in the work within the general scope
of the subagreement Including but not limited
(I) in the specifications (including drawings
and designs);
(ill In the time, method or manner of
performance of the work:
(iii) In the recipient-furnished facilities,
equipment, materials, services or site, or
(iv) Directing acceleration in the
performance of the work. .
(2) A change order shall also be any other
written order (Including direction, instruction.
interpretation or determination) from the
recipient which causes-any change, provided
the contractor gives the recipient written
notice stating tbe date, circumstances and
source of the order and that the contractor
regards the order as a change order.
(3) Except as provided in this clause, no
order, statement or conduct of the recipient
shall be treated as a change under this clause
or entitle the contractor to aa equitable
adjustment
(4) If any change under this clause causes
an increase or decrease in the contractor's
cost or the time required to perform any pan
of the work under this contract, whether or
not changed by any order, the recipient shall
make an equitable adjustment and modify the
aubagreement in writing. Except for claims
based on defective specifications, no claim
far any change under paragraph (a)(2) above
shall be allowed for any costs incurred more
than 20 days before the contractor gives
written notice as required in paragraph (a)(2).
ID the case of defective specifications for
which me recipient is responsible, the
equitable adjustment shall include any
increased cost the contractor reasonably
incurred in attempting to comply with those
defective specifications.
(S) If the contractor intends to assert a
claim for an equitable adjustment under this
clause, he must, within 30 days after receipt
of a written change order under paragraph (a)
(1) or the furnishing of a written notice under
paragraph (a) (2). submit a written statement
to the recipient setting forth the general
nature and monetary extent of such claim.
The recipient may extend the 30-day period.
The contractor may include the statement of
claim in the notice under paragraph (2) of this
change clause.
(6) No claim by the contractor for an
equitable adjustment shall be allowed if
made after final payment under this
subagreement.
(bj The following clause applies only to
subagnements for services. (l}The recipient
may at any time, by written order make
changes within the general scope of this
subagreement in the services or work to be
performed. If such changes cause an increase
or decrease in the contractor's cost or time
required to perform any services under this
subagreement whether or not changed by
any order, the recipient shall make an
equitable adjustment and modify this
subagreement in writing. The contractor must
assert any claim for adjustment under this
clause in writing within 30 days from the date
it receives the recipient's notification of
change, unless the recipient grants additional
time before the date of final payment.
(2] No services for which the contractor
will charge an additional compensation shall
be furnished without the written .
authorization of the recioient.
(c) The following clause applies only to
subagreements for supplies. (1J The recipient
may at any time, by written order and
without notice to the sureties, change the
general scope of this subagreement in any
one or more of the following:
(i) Drawings, designs or specifications
where the supplies to be furnished are
specifically manufactured for th» recipient
(Li) Method of shipment or packing; and
(Ui) Place of delivery.
(2) If any change causes an increase or
decrease in the cost or the time required to
perform any part of the work under this
subagreement whether or not changed by
any such order, the recipient shall make an
equitable adjustment in the subagreement
agreement price or delivery schedule, or both.
and modify the subasreement in writing. The
contractor must assert any claim for
adjustment under this clause within 30 days
tram the date the contractor receives the
recipient's notification of change. If the
recipient decides that the facts justify such
action, the recipient may receive and act
upon any such claim asserted at any time
before final payment under this
subagreement Where the cost of property
made obsolete or excess as a result of a
change is included in the contractor's claim
for adjustment the recipient has the right to
prescribe the manner of disposition of such
property. Nothing in this clause shall excuse
the contractor from proceeding with the
subagreement as changed.
4. Differing Site Conditions
The following clause applies only to
construction subagreements. (a] The
contractor shall promptly, and before such
conditions are disturbed, notify the recipient
in writing of:
(1) Subsurface or latent physical co
at the site differing materially from
indicated in this subagreemen'.. or
(2) Unknown physical conditions at the
site, of an unusual nature, differing materially
from those ordinarily encountered and
generally recognized as inhering in work of
the character provided for in this
subagreement.
(b) The recipient shall promptly investigate
the conditions. If it finds that conditions
materially differ and will cause an increase
or decrease in the contractor's cost or the
time required to perform any part of the work
under this subagreement whether or not
changed as a result of such conditions, the
recipient shall make an equitable adjustment
and modify the subagreement in writing.
(c) No claim of the contractor under this
clause shall be allowed unless the contractor
has given the notice required in paragraph (a)
of this clause. However, the recipient may
extend the time prescribed in paragraph (a).
(d) No claim by the contractor for an
equitable adjustment shall be allowed if
asserted after final payment under this
subagreement.
5. Suspension of Work
The following clause applies only to
construction sitbagreementa. (a) The recipient
may order the contractor in writing to
suspend, delay or interrupt all or any part of
the work for such period of time as '
recipient may determine to be ap
the convenience of the recipient
(b) If the performance of all or any pSTt of
the work is suspended, delayed or
interrupted for an unreasonable period of
time by an act of the recipient in
administration of this subagreement or by
the recipient's failure to act within the time
specified in this subagreement (or if no time
is specified, within a reasonable time], the
recip>nt shall make an adjustment for any
increase in the cost of performance of this
subagreement (excluding profit) necessarily
caused by such unreasonable suspension,
delay or interruption and modify the contract
writing. However, no adjustment shall be
made under this clause for any suspension,
delay or interruption to the extent (1) that
performance would have been so suspended,
delayed or interrupted by any other cause.
including the fault or negligence of the
contractor, or (2) for which an equitable
adjustment is provided for or excluded under
any other provision of this subagreement.
(c] No claim under this clause shall be
allowed (1) for any costs incurred more than
20 days before the contractor notified the
recipient in writing of the act, or failure to
act involved (this requirement does not appl
to a claim resulting from a suspension order)
and (2) unless the amount claimed is asserte<
in writing as soon as practicable after the
termination of such suspension, delay or
interruption, but not later than l
final payment under the sub
014
-------
Federal Register / Vol. 48, No. 60 / Monday, March 28. 1983 / Rules and Regulations 12935
•.Termination
(a) This subagreement may b« terminated
in whole or in part in writing by either party
in the event of lubstantial failure by the other
party to fulfill its obligations under this
subagreeroent through no fault of the
terminating party, provided that no
termination may be effected unless the ether
party is given (1) not less than ten (10)
calendar days' written notice (delivered hy
certified mail, return receipt requested) of
intent to terminate, and (2) an opportunity for
consultation with the terminating party prior
to termination.
(b) Una tubagreement may be terminated
in whole or in part in writins by the recipient
for its convenience, provided that the
contractor is given (1) not less than ten (10)
calendar days' written notice (delivered by
certified mail return receipt requested) of
intent to terminate, and (2) an opportunity for
consultation with the terminating party prior
to termination.
(c) If termination for default Is effected by
the recipient, an equitable adjustment in the
price provided for in this subagreement shall
be made, but (1) no amount shall be allowed
for anticipated profit on unperformed
services or other work, and (2) any payment
due to the contractor at the time of
termination may be adjusted to cover any
additional costs to the recipient because of
the contractor's default If termination for
default is effected by the contractor, or if
termination for convenience is effected by the
recipient the eauitable adjustment shall
include a reasonable profit for services or
other work performed The equitable
adjustment for any termination shall provide
for payment to the contractor for services
rendered and expenses incurred prior to the
termination, in addition to termination
settlement costs reasonably incurred by the
contractor relating to commitments which
had become firm prior to the termination.
(d) Upon receipt of a termination action
under paragraphs (a) or (b) above, the
contractor shall (1) promptly discontinue all
affected work (unless the notice directs
otherwise), and (2J deliver or otherwise make
available to the recipient all data, drawings,
specifications, reports, estimates, summaries
and such other information and materials as
may have been accumulated by the
contractor in performing this subagreement
whether completed or in process.
(e) Upon termination under paragraphs (a)
or (b) above, the recipient may take over the
work and may award another party a
subagreement to complete the work under
this subagreement
(!) if, after termination for failure of the
contractor to fulfill contractual obligations, it
is determined that the contractor had not
failed to fulfil] contractual obligations, the
termination shall be deemed to have been for
the convenience of the recipient In such
event adjustment of the subagreement price
•hall be made as provided in paragraph (c) of
this clause.
7. Remedies
Unless otherwise provided in this
•tibagreement, all claims, counter-claims.
disputes and other matters in question
between the recipient and the contractor
•rising out of. or relating to, this
subagreement or the breach of it will be
decided by arbitration If the parties mutually
agree, or in a court of competent jurisdiction
within the State in which the recipient is
located.
8. Price Reduction for Defective Cost or
Pricing Data
[Note,—The following clause applies to (I)
any subagreement negotiated between the
recipient audits contractor in excess of
$100.000: (2) negotiated subagnement
amendments or change orders in excess of
fJOHOOO affecting the price of formally
advertised, competitively awarded, fixed
price subagreement, or (3) any lower tier
subagreement or purchase order in excess of
$100.000 under a subagreement other than a
formally advertised, competitively awarded,
fixed price subagreement. This clause does
not apply to subagreements awarded on the
basis of effective price competition.]
(a) 7n* contractor and subcontractor,
where appropriate, assure that the cost and
pricing data submitted for evaluation with
respect to negotiation of prices for negotiated
subagreements. lower tier subagreements and
change orders Is based on current accurate
and complete data supported by their books
and records. If the recipient or EPA
determines that any price (including profit)
negotiated in connection with this
subagreement lower tier subagreement or
amendment thereunder was increased by any
slgifltant sums because the data provided
was incomplete, inaccurate or not current at
the time of submission, then such price or
cost or profit shall be reduced accordingly
and the recipient shall modify the
subagreement in writing to reflect such
action.
(b) Failure to agree on a reduction shall be
subject to the remedies clause of this
subagreement
[Note.—Since the subagreement is subject
to reduction under this clause by reason of
defective cost or pricing data submitted in
connection with lower tier subagreements,
the contractor may wish to include a clause
in each lower tier subagreement requiring the
lower tier subcontractor to appropriately
indemnify the contractor. It is also expected
that any lower tier subcontractor subject to
such indemnification will generally require
substantially similar indemnification for
defective cost or pricing data submitted by
lower tier contractors.}
9, Audit; Access to Records
(a) The contractor shall maintain books,
records, documents and other evidence
directly pertinent to performance on EPA
funded work under this subagreement in
accordance wiih generally accepted
accounting principles and practices
consistently applied, and 40 CFR Part 30 in
effect on the date of execution of this
subagreement The contractor shall also
maintain the financial information and data
used in the preparation or support of the cost
submission required under 40 CFR 33.290 for
any negotiated subagreement or change order
and a copy of the cost summary submitted to
the recipient The United States
Environmental Protection Agency, the
Comptroller General of the United States, the
United States Department of Labor, the
recipient and (the State] or any of their
authorized representatives shall have access
to all such books, records, documents and
other evidence for the purpose of inspection,
audit and copying during normal business
hours. The contractor will provide proper
facilities for such access and inspection,
(b) If this is a formally advertised.
competitively swarded, fixed price
subagreement the contractor agrees to make
paragraphs (a) through (g) of this clause
applicable to all negotiated change orders
and subagreement amendments affecting the
subagreement price. In the case of ail other
types of prime subagreements, the contractor
agrefts in make paragraphs (a) through (gj
applicable to all subagnementa he award* in
excess of $10.000, at any tier, and to make
paragraphs (a) through (g) of this clause
applicable to all change orders directly
related to project performance.
(c) Audits conducted under this provision
shall be in accordance with generally
accepted auditing standards and with
established procedures and guidelines of the
reviewing or audit agency(ies).
(d) The contractor agrees to disclose all
information and reports resulting from acces;
to records under paragraphs (a) and (b) of
this clause to any of the agencies referred to
in paragraph (a).
(e) Records under paragraphs (a) and (b)
above shall be maintained by the contractor
during performance on EPA assisted work
under this subagreement and for the time
periods specified in 40 CFJf f«rt 30. in
addition, those records whun relate'to any
controversy arising under an EPA assistance
agreement litigation, the settlement of claim i
' arising out of such performance or to costs o
items to which an audit exception has been ]
taken shall Be maintained by the contractor
for the time periods specified in 40 CFR Part
30.
(f) Access to records is not limited to the
required retention periods. The authorized
representatives designated in paragraph (a)
of this clause shall have access to records a'
any reasonable time for as long as the
records an maintained.
(g} This right of access clause applies to
financial records pertaining to all
subagreements (except formally advertised,
competitively awarded, fixed price
subagreements} and all subagreement chanj
orders regardless of the type of
subagreement and all subagreement
amendments regardless of the type of
subagreement In addition this right of acee:
applies to all records pertaining to all
subagreements, subagreement change order
and subagreement amendments:
(1) To the extent the records pertain
directly to subagreement performance;
(2) If there is any indication that fraud,
gross abuse or corrupt practices may be
involved; or
(3) If the subagreement Is terminated for
default or for convenience.
10. Covenant Against Contingent FMS
The contractor assures that no person or
selling agency has been employed or retain
C-15
-------
12936 Federal Register / Vol. 48, No. 60 / Monday. March 26. 1983 / Rules and Regulations
, ' ." "idt or secure this subagreement upon an
neat or understanding for a
• .lissioa. percentage, brokerage or
contingent fee excepting bona fide employees
or bona fide established commercial or
selling agencies maintained by the contractor
for the purpose of securing business. For
breach or violation of this assurance, the
recipient shall have the right to annul this
agreement without liability or. at its
discretion, to deduct from th«s contract price
or consideration, or otherwise recover the full
amount of such commission, percentage,
brokerage or contingent fee.
11, Gratuities
(a) If the recipient finds after a notice and
hearing that the contractor or any of the
contractor's agents or representatives offered
or gave gratuities (is the form of
entertainment, gifts or otherwise) to eny
official, employee or ageat of the recipient.
the State or EPA in an attempt to secure a
tubagreement or favorable treatment in
awarding,
determinations related to the performance of
this subagreement. the recipient may, by
written notice to the contractor, terminate
this subagreement The recipient may also
pursue other rights and remedies that the law
or this subagreement provides. However, the
existence of the facts oa which the recipient
bases such findings shall be in issue and may
be reviewed in proceedings under the
Remedies clause of this subagreement.
fb) IE the event this subagreement is
runated as provided in paragraph (a), the
pieat may pursue the same remedies
-iiainst the contractor as it could pursue in
the event of a breach of the subagreement by
the contractor, *nd as e penalty, in addition
to any other damage* to which it may be
entitled by law. he entitled to exemplary
damages in aa »«*ount (as determined by the
recipient) which ttail be not less than three
nor more Uiaa ten times the costs >hs
contractor incurs in providing any such
gratuities to eny such officer «w employee.
12. Buy American
This clause applies only to construction
sabagnements award under 40 CFR Part 3S
Suboafts E and I. In accordance with section
215 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et
seq.) and implementing EPA regulations, the
contractor agrees that preference will be
given to domestic construction material by
the contractor, subcontractors, materialmen
and suppliers in the performance of this
subagreement
13. Responsibility of the Contractor
(a} The fallowing douse applies only to
subagreeateats for services. (1) The
contractor is responsible for the professional
quality, technical accuracy, timely
completion and coordination of all designs.
drawings, specifications, reports and other
services furnished by the contractor under
this subagreement U the *u.bagre«ment
involves environmental measurements or
data generation, the contractor shall comply
•nth EP.1 quality assurance requirements in
4ft CFR 30.S03. Toe contractor shall, without
additional compensation, correct or revise
any errors, omissions or other deficiencies in
his designs, drawing*, specifications, reports
and other services.
(2) The contractor shall perform the
professional services necessary to
accomplish the work specified in this
subagreement in accordance with this
subagreement and applicable EPA
requirements in effect on the date of
execution of the assistance agreement for this
project
(3) The owner's or EPA's approval of
drawings, designs, specifications, reports and
incidental work or materials furnished
hereunder shall not in any way relieve the
contractor of responsibility for the technical
adequacy of his work. Neither the owner's
nor EPA's review, approval acceptance or
payment far cay of the services shall be
construed as a waiver of any rights under this
agreement or of any came for action arising
out of the performance of this subagreemeni.
(4) The contractor shall be, aad shall
remain, liable in accordance with applicable
law for all damages to the owner or EPA
caused by th« contractor's negligent
performance of eny of the services furnished
under this subagreement, except for errors,
omissions or other deficiencies to the extent
attributable to the owner, owner-furnished
data or any third party. The contractor shall
aot be responsible for any time delays in the
project caused by circumstances beyond the
contractor's control.
(5) The contractor's obligations under this
clause an in addition to the contractor's
other express or implied assurances under
this subagreemsnt or State law and in ao way
diminish any other rjphts that the owner may
have against the contractor for faulty
materials, equipment or work.
(bj The follmvfng douse applies only to
subagreemexu for construction. [1] The
contractor agrees to perform ail work under
thin subagreeoent in accordance with this
agreement's designs, drawings and
sp^rir rations.
(2) The contractor guarantees for a period
of at least one (1) year from the date of
substantial completion of the work that the
completed work is free from all defects due to
faulty materials, equipment or workmanship
and that he shall promptly maVe whatever
adjustments or corrections which may be
aecmary to cure any defects, including
repairs of any damage to other parts of the
system resulting from such defects. The
owner shall promptly give notice to the
contractor of observed defects. In the event
that the contractor fails to make adjustments.
repairs, corrections or other work made
necessary by such defects, the owner may do
10 and charge the contractor the cost
incurred. The performance bond shall remain
in full force and effect through the guarantee
period.
(3] The contractor's obligations under this
clause are in addition to the contractor's
other express or implied assurances under
this subagreement or State law and in no way
diminish any other rights that the owner may
have against the contractor for faulty
material*, equipment or work.
14. Final Payment
Upon satisfactory completion of the work
performed uader this subagreement. as a
condition before final payment under this
subagreement or ai a termination settlement-
under this subagreement the contractor shall
execute and deliver to the owner a release of
all claims against the owner arising under, or
by virtue of, this subagreement, except claims
which are specifically exempted by the
contractor to be set forth therein. Unless
otherwise provided in this subagreement. by
State law or otherwise expressly agreed to by
the* parties to this subagreesent. final
payment under this subagreement or
settlement upon termination of this
subagreement shall not constitute a waiver of
the owner's claims against the contractor or
his sureties under this subagreement or
applicable performance and payment bonds.
Subpart G- Protest*
J 3X1105 AppitcalMmy and scope of trite
eubpart
This subpart sets forth EPA's
administrative process for the rapid
resolution of protest appeals filed with
the award official
$33.1110 Recipient protest procedures,
fa) Recipients must establish their
own procedures for prompt
consideration of initial protests
concerning their solicitations or contract
awards. A "protest" is a written
complaint concerning the recipient's
solicitation* or award of a subagreement.
It must be filed with the recipient by a
party with a direct financial interest
adversely affected by a recipient's
procurement action (see 5 33.1130
"Review of protest appeal").
(b) The recipient should review each
protest received to determine whether it
is appropriate to defer the protested
procurement action.
(c) If the recipient does not defer the
procurement action, it assumes the risk
that the award official may disallow the
cost of die protested procurement action
if the protest appeal is upheld.
§ 33.1115 Protest appeal.
(a) A party with a financial interest
which is adversely affected by the
recipient's decision on the initial protest
may file a "protest appeal" with the
award official.
(b) A "protest appeal" is a written
complaint filed with the award official
regarding the recipient's determination
of a protest
S 33.1120 Limitations on protest appeals.
(a) The award official shall not accept
a protect appeal until the protester has
exhausted all administrative remedies at
the recipient level.
(b) A protest appeal is limited to the
following-.
(1) Issues arising under the
procurement provisions of this Part, or
C-16
-------
Federal Register / Vol 48; No. 60 / Monday. March 28. 1983 / Rules and Reg- -JOBS 12937
(2) Alleged violations of State or local
law or ordinances where the award
I determine* that there la an
•idlng Federal requirement.
_ k) A recipient of a lower tier
subagreement (subcontract) may only
file a protest appeal for issues which
relate to the award of a subagreement
by a contractor (see { 33.295
"Sobagreements awarded by a
contractor j. *
(a) Protest appeala most be filed with
the Assistant General Counsel for
GraatcfotHeadquartets'-awarded '.
assistance agreement* and with the
Office of Regional Conaael for regionally
awarded aMistanca agreement.
(b) Apnteat appeal muse
(1) Bff written:
(2) Include a copy of the recipient's
determination of the protest;
(3) Stats the basis for the appeal: and
{4} Request a determination under this
sabpart
(c) Upon filing a protest appeal with
the Regional Counsel or Assistant
General Counsel for Grants, ae
appropriate, the party filing the protest .
appeal most concurrently transmit a
copy of all protest documents *™^ any
attachments to all other parties-with a.
t financial interest which may be- .
' affected by the determination
s protest appeal • '
(d) The award official will only
consider written protest appeals
received by the appropriate Counsel's
office within seven ^imvfa* days after
the adversely affected party receives the
recipient*s determination of protest
However, the adversely affected party
can meet the seven-day notice •
requirement by telegraphing the Counsel
within the seven-calendar-day period of
its intect-to file a protest appeal.
provided tha adversely* affected party
submits a complete protest appeal
within seven calendar days of the date it
sends the telegram. If the seventh day
falls on a Saturday, Sunday or holiday,
the next working day shall be the last
day to submit a protest appeal
(ej Any party which submits a
document to the award official during
tha course of a protest appeal must
simultaneously furnish all other affected
parties with a copy of th" document.
} 33.1130 Review ef protect appeal
(a) If the recipient does not receive the
initial protest before bid opening or the
closing date for receipt of proposals, the
official* may dismiss as untimely
est appeal based upon alleged
in the solicitation which
were dearly apparent before bid
opening or before the deadline for
receipt of initial proposals. In negotiated
procurements, protests of alleged
improprieties which were incorporated
hi a new solicitation must have been
received by the recipient by the dosing
date for receipt of proposals for the new
solicitation.
(b) In cases not Involving
Improprieties in the solicitation, the
award official may dismiss as untimely
a protest appeal If the adversely
affected party did not file the initiaL
protast with- the recipient within seven
calendar days of tha date the basis for
the protest was known or should have
been known, whichever is earlier.
J 33.114* Deferral of procurement acton. .
. * When the award official receives a
protest appeal and the recipient has not
deferred the procurement action under
5 33.1110(b), the award official must
promptly request that the recipient defer
the protested prncufgmpnt action until
tha award official notifies the recipient
• of the formal or informal resolution of
the appeal Toe request shall be limited
to the award of the subagreement or
subitem which is the basis of the protest
appeal
{33.1748 Award efflcWa rwiew.
(a) The award official may establish
rules of procedures or deadlines for the
submission of materials or the
arrangement of protest appeal
conferences. . • -
(b) The award official may summarily
rH«mia« an appeal without proceedings
ttrtf?gy rtflf snbpart iŁ
(1) The protest appeal is not -
review-able, see S 33.1130, or addressee
Issues, other than those allowed under
$33.1120(0):
(21 The protester substantially fails to
comply with the procedural
requirements of this subpart or
(3) The protester does not agree to the
recipient's request for a reasonable
extension of the bid and bond period.
(c) The award official may summarily
deny a protest appeal without
lings under this subpart iŁ after
considering the facts in a light most
favorable to the protester, the award
official believes that the protest lacks-
merit,
(dJ.Tbe award official will give both
the recipient and the protester, as well
aa any other party with a financial
interest which may be adversely
affected by the determination of protest
an opportunity to present arguments in
support of their views in writing or at a
conference.
(e) After the announced date for
receipt of written arguments, tha record
shall be dosed.
C-17
(f) The award official shall review tf e
record considered by the recipient and
any-other documents or arguments
presented by the parties to determine
whether the recipient has complied with
the procurement requirements of this
part and has a rational basis for its
determination of protest
(g) The award official's determination
shall constitute final EPA action from
which there shall be no further
administrative appeal No party may
appeal an award official's determination
of appeal to the EPA Board of
Assistance Appeals. • '
(b) Nothing in this subpart precludes
the award official from reviewing the
recipient's procurement action; (See
533415.)
(i) Noncompliance with the award
official's determination- of protest shall .
be cause for an action against the . .
recipient under 40 CFR Part 30 or 32.
(J) If an appeal involves legal issues
not explicitly addressed by this part the
award official shall resolve tha issue by
referring to other protest determinaticT.3
under this section and decisions of the
Comptroller General of the United- .
States or of the Federal courts
addressing Federal requirements.
comparable to procurement
requirements of this pact.
Appefiooc
KMipfants Who Do Not Orttfy Tneir
Piuuuauient System*. or lor R«dpienl» Who
Have Their ProomaMat C«tification»
Rooked By EPA
(a) The following procedural requirement*
apply to recipient* who;
(1) Do not certify to EPA that their
procurement system meets the minimum
pncarement requirement* ia this part, or
(2) nave their procurement caTuncao'on
revoked by the award official, a* stated in
} 33.21fi(b).
(b) TOOM recipients-must comply with the
requirements ia this part plus the following
procedural requirement*. These procedural
requirement* supplement the requirements is
me sections cited
(1) To comply with f yt.TXi
"Documentation," tha recipient oust submit
to the award official the records required by
ibis section.
(2) To comply with S 31290. "Cost and
price consideration*," the recipient's
contractor! and subcontractors must submit
their cost or price data on EPA Form 5700-11.
"Cost or Price Summary Format for
Snbegreements Under U.S EPA Grants.'' or
m another format which provide* information
similar to that required by EPA Form STOO-ii.
(3) To comply with { 33.413, Time for
preparing bid*," the recipient must allow at
least 30 day* between the date when it first
pubusbes the public notice and the date by
which bids must ba submitted.
(4) To comply with { 33.415. "Public notice
and tobdtatioa of bid*," the recipient must
publish the notice in professional journal*,
-------
12938 Federal Register / Vol. 48, No. 60 / Monday. March 28, 1983 / Rules and Regulations
rarwmpapers. or publication* of general
circulation over t re«jot»ble art* for at lean
30 days before bid opening.
(5) To comply with i 33.510. -Adequate
public ootica." the recipient mu*t publish the
notice in professional journal*, newtpapen*
or publication* of general orculafloo over a
reasonable ana for at toe* 30 dayi before
the deadline for receipt of propowb. The
recipient may un jMstad public notices or
written ootiScaonn directed to interested
penoa*. finaa or proiesaioaal organizations.
C-18
-------
: 33.235
33.240
33.250
33.255
33.265
33.270
33.275
33.285
33.290
33.295
^33.305-310
33.405-435
33.505-535
33.605
SUBPARTS
C-G
C
0
E
• >
G
PRQPJTS - System procedures must allow only fair and reasonable D'ofits to comracto'i.
SMALL. MINORITY, WOMEN'S. AND LABOR SURPLUS AREA BUSINESSES • System must provide *cr use _- T'V:;:
businesses as specified in this section.
QP.CU. MENTATION • System must require that procurement records and files for purchases over $10,000 inciudt iier-;
specified in this section.
SPECIFICATIONS • Svstem procedures for establishing specifications for products or services to be procured must mes:
requirements of this section.
•
s
BONDING AND INSURANCE • System procedures and requirements related to bondinq and insurance must meet
requirements of this section.
CODE QP CONDUCT - Svstem must have a written code or standards of conduct meeting the requirements of this
section.
FEDERAL COST PRINCIPLES • Svstem procedures for determining allowable costs must comply with the cost
principles specified in this section.
PROHIBITED TYPES OF CONTRACTS - Svstem may not allow use of cost-Dlus-oercentaae-of cost (multiplier* or
percentage-of -construction-cost types of contracts.
QOST AND PRICE CONSIDERATIONS - System procedures must allow for consideration of cost and price as require*
in this section.
SUBAGREEMENTS AWARDED BY A CONTRACTOR - System must provide that the contractor's subagreements
comply with provisions specified in this section.
*
SMALL PURCHASE • System small purchase procedures must meet requirements of these .sections.
FORMAL ADVERTISING - System procedures related to formal advertising, including those for bidding documents
and contract awards, must meet the requirements of these sections.
COMPETITIVE NEGOTIATION - Svstem procedures for competitive negotiation must meet the requirements of thes
sections.
NONCOMPET1TIVE NEGOTIATION • Svstem procedures for noncompetitive negotiation must meet the requtremen-
of this section.
SYSTEM MUST COMPLY WITH REQUIREMENTS IN THESE SUBPARTS:
CLEAN WATER ACT REQUIREMENTS- Subpart applies to procurement under assistance agreements for construct:
of treatment works under the Clean Water Act.
REQUIREMENTS FOR INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION AND OTHER NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION
Subpart describes the procurement requirements for nonprofit organizations.
REQUIREMENTS FOR RECIPIENTS OF REMEDIAL ACTION COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS UNDER THE
COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE. COMPENSATION AND LIABILITY ACT OF 1980-Suboart
describes the additional procurement requirements for recipients of these cooperative agreements. |
SUB AGREEMENT PROVISIONS • Subagreements for procurement under EPA Assistance mint contain the aoproori 1
clauses, or their equivalent, specified in this subpart. 1
PROTESTS • Subpart applies to all applicants for EPA assistance except ftjr nonprofit oroanizations. 1
EPA Form 570O48 (Rm. »-82)
C-19
-------
-------
APPENDIX D
OMB Circular A-122 "Cost Principles
for Non-Profit Organizations"
D-l
-------
TEXT
OMB CIRCULAR A-J22, "COST PRINCIPLES FOR NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS"
OFFICE Of MANAGEMENT AND
BUDGET
A-122, -Co*1 Prtndpto* for
AOCNCY: Office of Management aod
Budget.
ACTION: Final Policy.
•UMMAHV: This notice advises of • new
OMB Circular dealing with principle* for
determining costs of grand, contricli.
•nd other agreements with nonprofit
organizations.
The Circular is the product of an
interagency review conducted over a
two-year period. Its purpose Is lo
provide a set of cost principles to
replace existing principles issued by
individual agencies. These have often
contained varying and conflicting
requirements, and created confusion
among agency administrators, auditor*.
and nonprofit officials. The new Circular
will provide a uniform approach lo the
problem of determining costs, and
promote efficiency and better
understanding between recipient* and
the Federal Government.
tmcrm DATE: The Circular becomes
effective on issuance.
FOfl nMTHIJI MFOffMATION CONTACT
Palmer A. Marcantonio, Financial
Management Branch, Office of
Management and Budget. Washington.
D.C. 20503. (202) 395-4773.
»ur«>UMCKTAMY sj«rosmia.TiOM: Before
the Circular became final there was
extensive coordination with the affected
nonprofit organizations, professional
associations, Federal agencies and
others. Ail interested persons were
given an opportunity to comment on the
proposed Circular through informal
consultations and a notice in the Fedora!
Kegister. in response to our requests for
commsnt. we received about 100 letters
from Federal agencies, nonprofit
Organ: za i ions, associations, and other
Interested members of the public. These
commons were considered in the final
verxion of the Circular. There follows a
summary of the major comments and the
action taken on each.
In addition to the changes described.
other changes have been made to
improve the clarity and readability of
the Circular. To 'he extent possible, we
have tried Ic male the language of this
Circular consistent with that of cost
principle for educational institutions
(Circular A-2J), and State jnd local
government! (Circular 74-*).
Summery of Significant Chalet:
Set foith are changes that have been
made in the final Circular as a result of
public comments. The more significant
changes lo the basic Circular and
Attachment A include:
1. Paragraph 2- "Supersession" was
added to the basic Circular lo make it
dear that this Circular supersedes cost
principles issued by Individual agencies.
2. Paragraph 4 of the basic Circular
has been amended lo make it dear that
tb« absence of an advance agreement oa
Any element of coat will not in Itself
affect the reasonableness of allocability
of thai element. Also, this paragraph
was amended to make il dear that
where An Item of cost requiring prior
approval is specified in the budget.
Approval of the budget constitutes
Approval of the cost.
3. Paragraph 5 of the basic Circular
has been dunged to remove Any doubt
AS to which nonprofit organizations
would not be covered by the ""'radar.
Now, Appendix C to the Circ-ar lists all
vxdusion*.
4. Paragraph 6 was added to the basic
Circular to permit Federal agendes to
request exceptions from the
requirements of the Circular.
5. Paragraph EL2. was added to
Attachment A to cover the negotiation
and approval of Indirect coal rates, Aod
to provide fpr cognizance arrangements.
The more significant changes to
Attachment B to the Circular indude:
1. Paragraph 5, Compensation for
Personal Services, was modified to:
A. Permit Federal agendes to accept a
substitute system for documenting
personnel coats through means other
than personnel activity reports.
, b. Clarify provisions covering the
aUowability of costs for unemployment
compensation or workmen's
compensation, and coats of insurance
policies on the lives of trustees, officers.
or other employees.
c. Make unallowable any increased
costs of pension plans caused by
delayed funding.
d. Delete a paragraph dealing with
review «nd approval of compensation of
Individual employees.
2. Paragraph 6, Contingencies, WAS
changed to make it dear that the term
"contingency reserves" exdudes self*
insurance reserves or pension funds. •
3. Paragraph 10 was modified to
provide that the value of donated
services used in the performance of a
direct cost activity shaJJ be allocated a
•hare of indirect cost only when (aj the
aggregate value of the sen-ice is
material (b) the services are supported
by a significant Amount of the indirect
cost incurred by the organization, and
(cj the direct cost activity is not pursued
primarily for the benefit of the Federal
Government. Provisions were also _ .
•dded to this paragraph for the
cognizant Agency and the recipient to
aegotiate when there is no basis for
determining the fair market value of the
eervices rendered, and lo permit indirect
costs allocated to donated services to be
charged to an agreement or used lo meet
cost sharing or matching requirements.
4. Paragraph 31. Equipment and Other
Capital Expenditures, was changed.
Capital equipment is BOW defined as
having an acquisition cost of $500 and a
aaeful life of more than two years.
B. Paragraph 26. Meetings.
Conferences. The prior approval
requirement for charging meetings and
conferences as a direct cost was
deleted. A sentence was added to make
It dear such costs were allowable
provided they meet the criterion for the
•llowability of cost shown in
Attachment A.
6. Paragraph 27. Organization Costs.
was Amended to provide that
organization costs may be allowable
when approved in writing by the
Awarding agency.
7, Paragraph 30. Page Charges in
Professionalfoumc '•. was revised to
provide that page charges may be
Allowable.
8. Paragraph 37. Public Information
Costs, was modified to make
public information costs allowable as
direct costs with awarding agency
Approval.
B. Paragraph 43. Rental Costs, was
rewritten to:
A. Make it dear that rental costs
under leases which create a material
equity on the leased property ere
Allowable only to the amount that the
organization would have been allowed
bad they purchased the properly: e.g..
depreciation or use allowances,
maintenance, taxes, insurance, etc.
b. Clarify the criteria for material
equity leases.
10. Paragraph SI, Travel Costs, was
Amended lo delete the prior approval
requirement for domestic travel. In
Addition to the above, a number of
editorial changes were made to the
original document.
Suggested Changes Not Considered
Necessary.
Comment. Several respondents
questioned the provision that, for "less
than arm's length" teases, rental costs
Are allowable only up to the amount ih«i
would be allowed had title lo the
property been vested in the grantee
organization. In their opinion this ruie
will result in unnecessary cost lo thr
Federal Government, since it would
encourage an organization to lease
apace on the commercial market at
higher rate.
Published br THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL. AFFAIRS. INC.. WASHINGTON. D.C. 2OO3?
n-2
-------
Re*pi-n*e, The cost principles ira
designed lo cover mo»l situations:
however, there are always exceptions
lhat rouil be considered on • cite-by-'
cafe basis. The Circular contain! a
provision for Federal agencies to request
exceptions.'
Comment Several respondents
questioned why Interest la not an
allowable cost, since It Is an ordinary
and necessary cost of doing business.
Response. It has been • longstanding
policy oot to recognize interest as a cost.
However, tills policy has recently been
reviffd for State and local governments
in Circular 74-4. with respect to the coat
of office apace. The revision provide*
.thai "rental" rates for pubtfdy owned
buildings may be based on actual coats.
Including depreciation interest,
operation and maintenaea coats, and
other allowable costs. This revision was
under consideration for some time. It
was studied extensively by OMB. the
General Accounting Office and other*,
and considerable analysis went into its
formulation. Suggestions for extending It
to nonprofit organizations would have to
be examined with equal can. This has
not yet been done, and we were
reluctant to further delay issuance of
_this Circular.
Comment. Several respondents
questioned why public information costs
were not allowable as an Indirect coat
Response. Public information costs
•re often direct service* t9«n
organization's other programs. They an
allowable, however, at a direct charge
when they are within the scope of work
of a particular agreement
~~ Comment. One respondent suggested
that smaller grantees be excluded from
complying with the Circular.
Response. Similar rules for the SO
selected items of cost would be needed
regardless of the size of the grantee. To
the extent possible, the Circular
provides simplified methods for smaller
grantees.
Comment One respondent said the
requirements of the Cost Accounting
Standards Board should be applied to
cover contracts with nonprofit
organizations. *
Response. It Is unlikely that the type
of grantees covered by this Circular
would have contracts large enough to be
covered by the CASB. In the event that
they do. however, the regulations of the
CASB would apply.
Comment One respondent said the
allocation of indirect cost to donated
services would pose a tremendous
difficulty to the organization. The
organization relies on a corps of
approximately 6.000 committee members
to carry out obligations in response to
Government requests. There U no
employer relationship in the
arrangement! for thii assistance, nor are
there committee member* normally
reimbursed for such services. Further, it
was pointed out the committee member*
spend many thousands of hours outside
the organization's premises conducting
research.
Response. It would appear that this
type of committee arrangement would
not be considered In the determination
of the organization'* indirect cost rate
provided that Federal agreements do oot
bear an unreasonable share of Indirect
coat However, the cognizant agency
will be responsible for evaluating the
allocation of Indirect cost when there
•re committee-type arrangement* oo a
cmse-by-case basis.
. Comment One respondent suggested
that wherever possible the language in
the Federal Procurement Regulations be
•sed for nonprofit organisations.
/tnptfnn The language in the Federal
Procurement Regulations was
designated primarily for commercial
firms, and is not necessarily well suited
to nonprofit organizations. At the
suggestion of the General Accounting
Office, the nonprofit coat principles
were written to conform as closely as
possible to those of educational
Institutions (Circular A-21), and State
and local governments (Circular 74-4).
Chief, financial Managemeal BraaA
\OKdat No. A-ttt!
font 17.1980
To The Heads of Executive
Departments and Establishments
Subject Cost prindples for nonprofit
organizations.
1. Purpose. This Circular establishes
prindples for determining coats of
grants, contracts and other agreements
with nonprofit organizations. It does not
apply to colleges and universities which
are covered by Circular A-21: State.
local and federally recognized Indian •
tribal governments which are covered
by Circular 74-4: or hospitals. The
prindples are designed to provide that
the Federal Government bear Its fair
•hare of costs except where restricted or
prohibited by law. The prindples do not
•ttempt to prescribe the extent of cost
•baring or matching on grants, contracts,
or other agreements. However, such coat
•haring or matching shall not be
accomplished through arbitrary
limitations on individual cost elements
by Federal agendes. Provision for profit
or other increment above coat is outside
the scope of this Circular.
1 Supersession. This Circular
supersedes cost prindples issued by
individual agencies for nonprofit
organization.
3. Applicability, a. These principle
ahaU be used by all Federal agenciei
determining the costs of work perfor
by nonprofit organizations under gr»
cooperative agreements, cost
reimbursement contracts, and other
coatracts in which costs are uied in
pridng. administration, or settlemen
AH of tEese instruments are hereafre
referred to as awards. The principle!
not apply to awards under which ao
organization is not required lo accou
to the Government for actual costs
Incurred.
b. All cost reimbursement subawa
(subgrants. subcontracts, etc.) are
subject to those Federal cost prindp
applicable to the particular organiza
concerned. Thus, if • subaward is to
nonprofit organization, this Circular
•hall apply; if a subaward is to a
commercial organization, the cost
prindples applicable to commercial
concerns shall apply; if a subaward
• college or university, Circular A-Z
•ball apply; If a subaward is to a Sti
local, or federally recognized Indian
tribal government Circular 74-4 aha
apply.
4, Definitions, a. "Nonprofit
organization*means any corporatio
trust association, cooperative, or ot
organization which (1} is operated
primarily for scientific, educational
service, charitable, or similar purpot
In the public interest (2) is not
organized primarily for profit and (:
oses its net proceeds to maintain.
Improve, and/or expand its operatic
For this purpose, the term "aonprofi
organization" excludes (i) colleges t
universities; (ii] hospitals: (Ui) State.
local and federally recognized Indu
tribal government*; and (iv) those
nonprofit organizations which are
excluded from coverage of this Circ
in accordance with paragraph 5 bed
b. Trior approval" means securu
the awarding agency's permission ii
advance to incur cost for those Item
that are designated as requiring pric
approval by the Circular. Generally
permission will be in writing. When
item of cost requiring prior approva
specified in the budget of an award
approval of the budget constitutes
approval of that cost
fc Exclusion of some nonprofit
organizations. Some nonprofit
organizations, because of their size
nature of operations, can be confide
to be aimilar to commercial concern
purpose of applicability of cost
prindptes. Such nonprofit organizat
shall operate under Federal cost
prindples applicable to commercial
concerns. A listing of these
Published by THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS. INC.. WASHINGTON. D-C. 2O037
D-3
-------
organization* i* contained in
Attachment C Other organizations Bay
be added from time io time.
& Responsibilities. Agencies
responsible for administering program*
that involve awards to nonprofit
organizations sbatl implement the
provisions of this Circular. Upon
request. implementing Instruction shall
fee furnished to the Office of
Management and Budget. Agencies shall
designate a liaison official to serve as
the agency representative on matters
relating to the implementation of this
Circular. The name and title of such
representative shall be furnished to the
Office of Management «nd Budget
within 90 days of the dale of this
Circular.
7. Attachments. The principles and
related policy guides are act forth in the
following' Attachments:
Attachment A— General Principles
Attachment B— Selected Items of Cost
Attachment C— Nonprofit
Organization* Not Subject to This
Circular
B. Reque*tt for exceptions. The Office
of Management and Budget may grant
exceptions to the requirements of this
Circular when permissible under
existing law. However, in the interest of
achieving maximum uniformity.
exceptions will be permitted only in
highly unusual circumstances.
i. Effective Dote. Tbe provisions of
this Circular are effective immediately.
Implementation shall be phased in by
incorporating the previsions into new
•wards made after the start of the
organization's next fiscal year. For
existing awards the new principles may
be applied if an organization and the
cognizant Federal agency agree. Earlier
implementation, or a delay in
implementation of individual provisions
Is also permitted by mutual agreement
between an organization and the
cognizant Federal agency.
10. Inquiries. Further information
concerning this Circular may be
obtained by contacting the Financial
Management Branch. Budget Review
Division. Office of Management and
Budget. Washington. D.C. 20503.
telephone (202} 395-4773!
Dinctor,
(Circular No. A-122J
TttUt ofConte/ilt
A. Bask Considerations
1. Cocoposiiioa of lout costs
X. Factors affecting alienability of costs
9. Reasonable co*u
4. AllocaWe co*U
t Applicable credit*
e. Advance understanding*
& Direct Costs
C Indirect Coals
D. Allocation of Indirect Costs and
Determination of Indirect Cost iUtei
1. General
Z. Simplified sUocstioB method
I. Multiple sllocstion bs»« method
4. Direct allocation method
C. Special Indirect cost rates
E. Negotiation and Approval of Indirect Cost
Rales '
1. Definitions
2. Negotiations aad approval of rate*
(Circular No. A-122]
Aftaezuoanf A
Cecveral PriadpUs
A. Botic Contidtrotiont.
1 Competition oftoioJoottt. The total cost
of an sward is toe SUB of the allowable
direct aad allocable Indirect costs less any
applicable credit*.
Z. Factan effecting allowabilitv ofeotts.
To be allowable under an award, eosts must
saeet the following general criteria:
a. Be res sons ble for the performance of the
award and be ailocable thereto under these
principles.
b. Conform to any limitations or exclusions
act forth in these principle* or in the sward
as Io type* or amount of coit item*.
e. Be consistent with oollcie* and
procedure* thsl spply uniformly to both
federally financed aad other activities of the
organization.
d Be accorded consistent treatment.
e. Be determined in accordance with
stenerallv accepted accounting principle*.
f. No! be included a* a coil or u«ed to meet
cotUbaring or msu^ing requirement* of any
ether federally financed orogajm in either Ihe^
current or s prior period.
1. Be adequately documented.
9. Rfatofiable oottt, A coins reasonable
If. in Its nature or amount, ii does not exceed
thai which would be Incurred by a prudent
person under the circumstance* prevailing at
the time the derialon wa* made to incur the
costs. The question of the restonablenets of
specific cost* must be scrutinized with
particular care in connection with
organizations or separate divisions thereof
which receive the preponderance of their
support from awards made by Federal
agencies. In determining the reasonableness
of a given cost, consideration shall be given
10:
a. Whether the cost is of a type generally
tecognited ss ordinary and necessary for the
operation of the organization or the
performance of the award,
b. The restraint* or requirement! Imposed
by such factors ss generally accepted sound
Dullness practices, arms length bargaining.
Federal and State laws and regulations, and
atnns and conditions of the award.
e. Whether the individuals concerned acted
with prudence In the drctunstances.
considering their responsibilities to the
organization. Its members, employees, aad
client*, tht public al large, and the
Government.
d. Significant deviation* from the
eifsblithed practice* of the organization
which msy unjustifiably increaae the swsrd
costs.
4. Attocoble cost*. •
a. A coil i* ailocable to a particular
objective, such s* s grant, project service, or •
Other activity, in accordance with the relative
benefit* received. A cost i* ailocable Io a
Government sward if ii la treated
consistently with other cost* incurred for the
same purpose in like eircumitance* and if It:
(1) Is incurred specifically for the sward.
(2) Benefits both the sward snd other work
and can be distributed in reasonable
proportion to the benefit* received.
(S) Is necessary to the overall operation of
the organization, although s direct
felstionship to any particular cost objective
cannot be shown.
b. Anxpoal aJ)aeiihl« to m piirtinilitf award
or other cost objective under the»e principles
SMV nol be thifted to other Federal award* to
overcome funding deficiencies, or to avoid.
ugatrietioni impoagd by law or by the terms
of the aw>rj.
S. AppL - -sle credits.
a. Tbe term applicable credits refers to
those receipts, or reduction of expenditures
which operate to offset or reduce expanses
item* that ire ailocable to award* a* direct
. or indirect costs. Typical example* of such
transactions are: purchase discounts, rebates
or allowances, recoveries or indemnities on
losses, insurance refund*, and adjustment* of
overpayments or erroneous charge*. To the
extent that such credit* accruing or received
by the organization relate to allowable cost
they thai) be credited Io the Government
either ss a cost reduction or cash refund
appropriate.
b. in some instance*, the amount* recei
form the Federal Government to finance
organizational activities or sen-ice operations
should be treated as applicable credit*.
Specifically, the concept of netting such
credit item* against related expenditures
should be applied by the orgsnizaton in
delenning the rates or amount* to be
organization in determining the rates or
amaount* to be charged to Federal swards
for services rendered whenever the facilities
or other resources used in providing such
service* have been financed directly, in
whole or In part by Federal fund*.
a(c) For rule* covering program Income
(lit., groi* income earned from federally
supported setivities) see Attachment D of
OMB Circular A-110.
ft. Advance and understandings. Under any
given award the reasonableness and
atlocabllity of certain Items of cost* may be
difficult to determine. Thi* particularly true in
connection with orgizstion* that receive a
preponderance of their support from Federal
agencies. In order to avoid subsequent
diMUowance or dispute baaed on
unreatonableness or nonallocability, it is
often desirable to seek s written agreement
.with the cognizant or awarding agency in
advance of the incurrence of special or
nnuaal cost*. The absence of an advance
agreement on any element of cost will aot in
Itself, affect the reasonableness or
ellocsbility of that element.
eiv^i
Published by TWE BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS. INC.. WASHINGTON, D.C. J0037
P--
-------
B. Diner Cotlt
I. three! coat* ar« thot* that can be
Identified *pecifically with • particular final
cent objective: I.*. • particular award,
protect service. or otber direct activity of aa
organisation. However, • eoat nay not be
•atigned to aa •win] a* • direct ooet If any
other coal tacurred (or the Mine purpose. ta
like ciroumstance. be* been allocated to an
•ward aa an Indirect ooet Coat Identified
•pedfieaJly with ewarda an direct eoet of the
•ward* and an to be assigned directly
gfcereto. Coat Identified if— ^"illy with other
fiaaJ ooat objective* of (ht organization an
direct ooeU of those ooat objective* and art
MX to be assigned to ocW •ward* directly or
Indirectly.
X. Any direct eoet of a minor amognt nay
be treated u aa indirect ooet ofor reason* of
practicality wteir the account treatment for
auch coat i* conaiateatiy applied to all final
coat objective*.
S. Tbe ooat of certain actMtie* are aol
allowable a* charge* to Federal award* (eee,
lor example, fund raiting coati in paragraph
tl of Attachment B). However, tree though
tbe*« ooet* art unallowable for porpoae* of
computing charge* to Federal award*, Iney
Boaetheles* must be tn*t»d aa direct coat lor
purpose* of determining indirect ooat rate*
and be allocated their *han of the
organization'* Indirect ooat* if they leprataut
•ctivltle* which (1] include the aaiariea of
personnel, (2) occupy tpace. aod (3) benefit
Don thi arganlzation't indirect coat*.
4 The co«U of activitie* performed
art service ip mem oen. cHenls. or
'
the gene-raj public when gjgnincs'nt and
aecettAry to the organization'* mi»non putt
_b* tre«ted_t» direct co»t* when or not"
aflowjbTe «ni3 tc allocated an eouitgpfe
share of indirect cotti. Some exampjei of
(bete types oTacti viae* include:
a. Ma intcnsnce pT membership roll*.
aubjKTiolion*. publication*. and rtli ted
b. Providing *endoM and Information to '
f1|lativn>r tdmiru'itrativt
e. Protaetion. lobbying, and other foffinft of
d. Meetings and conference* except thoac
beld to conduct the aeneral adminutration of
9. Malntenacne. protection, and Investment
of apeefalTunli ncj used in operation 'of tEe~
f.AdminiiOTition of group benefit* on __
including life
jpiur«f»rji »nnn»y
, financial aid^
C Indinct CotL
1. indirect cost* an those mat have been
tecurred for common or }oinl objective* aad
cannot be readily, identified with a particular
final coat objective. Direct ooet of minor
•mount* may be treated at indirect coat*
•nder the conditions described In paragraph
&2. above. After direct coats ban bees
determined and assigned directly ta awards
or other work a* appropriate. Indinct ooata
an thoee remaining to be allocated to
benefiting coat objectives. A cost may not be
allocated n aa award at aa indirect aoet if
any other ooat Incurred lot the same ]
la like drcwniUncM. ha* bean aaaigned to
ao award aa a direct ooat.
S. Becauaa of the diveree characlenatic*
and accouDtlng pnctioaa of nonprofit
organization*, tl ta not poaalble to tpecify the
lypef of ooat which m*y be ckaalfied at
Indirect ooat ta all actuation. However, typical
aiimpW of kadirect ooat for naay aoaprofit
•rganaaaona nay iacfade depradatioD or
•aa allowance* os hoflding* aad equipment.*
fee eo*t* of openting and aMintaiaing
fadlibea. and teaaral adainiitrabaa and
gauiaral ecpenaea. anch a* the ttlarie* and
•xpaoaaa of exacattve officer*, peixainol
•dminittra.lioa.avd ~~—"Irj
O. Meeaticm afladinct Go* vd
DftvtawaUan o/Xadbvcf Ce»l Ralet.
t Canaml
a. Where a noaprpflt ortanbattoa ha* only
one major function, or when all it* ma|or
ninrrtnm benefit from It* mdirect coata to
• approximataly the aatta dagiee. the
allocation of indirect coat* and the
•omputatioa of an Indirect ooat rate may be
eecompUahed throqgh aimptified allocation
Broeedune aa daacrihfd in paragraph 2
b. Wien aa organization ha* *«*ereJ mafor
fcnctiona which benefit from ita indinct coata
In varying degnea. aUocadon of Indirect
co«t* may require the acotmulatioo of euch
eoatf into aeparata coat grouping! which then
are allocated todMduaUy to benefiting
funcnon* by maana of a bate which be*t
»«a*ure* the relative degree of benefit The
Indirect coata aUocatad to each function an
then distributed to mdrVidual award* and
other actirltte* inchtded la thit dunctton by
•Mini of aa Indirect ooat ntc(s].
c. The detemiaatioa of what eooatitute* aa
orgaolratioo'i major function* will depend on
lu purpose la being: me type* of eervfcce a
render* to the public, it* clients, and it*
•M'mbcta; and the amount of effort It devote*
to *uch activities a* fund raiting, public
Information and membership activin'et.
d. Specific BMtbod* for allocating indirect
Boats aad computing mdirect ooat rate* along
with the condition* under which each method
should be oaed an daecribad in paragraphs I.
Ihrongh 5 below.
•.Tbe bate period for the allocation of
indirect coat* U the period in which tuch
eoat* an Incurred and accumulated for
allocation wo work performed In thai period.
The bate period normally should coincide
with the organization-* Bacal year, but in any
•vat shall be to aelected a* to avoid
Inequities in the allocation of the coata.
2, Simplifiod allocation method.
a. When aa organization'* aaafor fancaont
benefit from ft* indirect coal* to
approximately the aame degre. the allocanoo
of indirect coats may be accompluhed by (I)
•oparaung dw organisation'* total coat* for
the baa* period as either direct or Indirect
•ad (U) dividing the total allowable Indirect
eoat* (net of applicable credit*) by an
•qvjtable dfetribnbon baaa. Tbe result of this
process la aa mdirect eoat rate which la Meed
to distribute tadincl eeau to individual
•ward*. The rala abowld b* expreaaed a* tka
pen an I ige which the total amount of
allowable mdirect ooatt ba*n to the bate
a*lactad.Tk^m*hodahouldalo*b*BB*d
where an organizetioe kit only one IE
function encompcMtng a aiunbar of
Individual project* or aetiviti**. and B
•sed where the le»«l of Federal aware
ortimuu'oo i* relatively tauill.
b. both the dime! oo*u and tk* tndu
aoat* thai! tkdud« capita] txpeodiiur
•naUowable ooata. However, uoallow
•oat* wfaicfc npreeani activftici nut!
•BdMUd ia me direct eoat* onder At
•andition* de*crib*d us paragrapb fL3
C. The diatribuooo b*** atay be loti
CD*U (excluding capital evpandiiurc*
•Cher dutortiAg itamt. each a* major
wboontract* or anbgraat*}. direct tali
•ad wage*, or other bat* which ruul
•qoitabla distribution, Tb* distributio
•hall generally exclude participant n
eoat* a* defined, ia parmgnph 28 of
AtUduaeatB.
d. Except when a apecial r»t*(i) i*
required ia accordance with patmgrej
below, the Indirect cost rat* devabpi
tb* above principle* ia applicable ta
•ward* at the orgaaizatioo. If a spec
raU(i) ia required, appropriate modi.'
•hall be mad* ia order to develop U»
g, Multipk allocation 00** ntthtu
a. Wben aa organisation'* tndiret
benefit it* major function* in varyinj
aucfa ooat* shall be ancurnnltted inter
eoat grouping* Each grouping shall t
allocated individually to benefiting I
by mean* of a bate which beat SMMM
relative benefit*.
b. Tbe grouping* thai! be eatabUsf
to permit the allocation of each groh
the bt*i* of benefit* provided to the
functions. Etch grouping should cot
pool of expense* that an of like cat
term* of the functions they benefit I
•arm* of the allocation bate which I
meaiurt the relative benefit* profit
function. Tbe number of separata g>
should be held within practical luni
Into conaideration the materiality o
amounts Involved and the ili'§m o
deiired.
c Actual condition* mud be talu
account In selecting the bate to be
allocating the expense* in each gro
benefiting function*. Wben aa allot
be made by assignment of • coat p
directly to me function benefited t
allocation shall be made ia that au
When the trr-mnt ia a grouping <
general ia nature, the allocatioa ab
made through tha u*e of a selected
which produce* n*ulu that an e
-------
function thall be egn»gsted and fretted ti •
common pool for thai function. The coil* in
the common pool shall then be diilributed to
indiviiusl a wart Included in that function by
use of • tingle indirect cott rite.
t. The diitribution bete used In computing
the indirect coil rate for etch function mty
tv total direct coiti (excluding capital
t -.pendirures and other distorting fietni inch
a* major subcontracts end lubgranti], direct
salaries and w«get. or other ate which
result! in an equitable diitribution. The
diitribution bate thai) generally exclude
participant support cottt at defined in
paragraph 29. Attachment B- An indirect cott
rate should be developed fir tech acparate
indirect cott pool developed. The rale IB each
case thould be tttted a* the percentage
which the amount of the particular indirect
coil pool t* of the distribution bate identified
with that pool.
4. Direct allocation method.
a. Some nonprofit organization*, treat all
cotti at direct cottt exgpct general
administration and general expense! Thete
organizations generally aeparate their cotU
into thre baiic categories: (i) Genera!
•dtninii(ration and general expentet. (It)
fund raiting, and (iii) other direct functions
(including project* performed under Federal
•wards). Joint costs, tuch at depreciation.
rental cotit. operation and maintenance of
farililiea. telephone expentet, and the like
are prorated indivisually at direct cott to
each category and to each award, or other
activity uting a bate nott appropriate to the
particular cott being prorated.
b. Hut method it acceptable provided each
Joint oo(t it prorated uting a bate which
accurately measures the benefits provided lo
each award or other activity. The batet mutt
be ettablished la accordance with returnable
criteria, and be tupported by current data.
Thii method it compatible with the
Standardt of Accounting and Financial
Reporting for Voluntary Health and Welfare
Organization* fttued Jointly by the National
Health Council. Inc.. the National Assembly
of Voluntary Health and Social Welfare
Organisation*, and the United Way of
America.
c Under thlt method, indirect cottt conjitt
ecluiively of general adminittration and
general expentet. in ail other reapectt. the
organization'! Indirect coat rateu tbaJ be
computed in the tame manner at that
described in paragraph D.2 above.
ft. Special indirect cott rate*. In tome
instance*, a tingle Indirect coat rate for all
activities of an organization or for each major
function of the organizeSon.ty not be
appropriate, tine* It would not take into
account tboa< different facton which may
wbstantially affect the indirect coata
applicabia to • particular segment of work.
For this purpose, a particular segment of
work. For this purpose, a particular segment
of work may be that perfprmed under a single
•ward or H may cent it t of work under •
group of awardt performed in a common
environment, the facton may Include the
pbyticaJ location of the work, tha level of
•daiiuatratrve snpport required, the nature of
the facilities or order resources employed, the
acienUflc disciplines or technical skill*
snvorved, the orgsniJstUmal arraagemanU
•ted. or any combination thereof. When a
particular tegment of work it performed in an
environment which ippcan to generate a
algnificantly different Jevel of Indirect cottt.
provitiont tbould be made for a aeparate
indirect cott pool applicable to auch work.
The teptrale indirect cott pool thould be •
developed during the court* of the regular
allocation proceit. and tie separate indirect
cott rate retailing therefrom thould be uted
provided It It determined that (i) the rata
differ* tignJRcaxitly Dr>m that which would
have been obtained under paragraph Di 3.
and 4 above, and (it) the volume of work to
which the rate would apply to material
X. Negotiation and Approval of Indirect Cott
Kate*.
1. Definitiont. As ured in thit section, the
following term* have the meaning! tet forth
below:
a. "Cognizant agency" meaju the Federal
agency retponaible for negotiating and
approving Indirect cott rate* for a nonprofit
organization on ben*!/ of all Federal
ageociea.
b. "ZEedaienninacLrate" meant an indirect
coal rate, applicable to a specified current or
future period, usually the organization'* Btcal
fear. The rate I* bated on an ettimate of the
costs to be incurred during the period. A
c. "Fi»rfl rats:" means an indirect coat rate
which has the same characteristics as a
predetermined rale, except that the difference
WfCfB tht tft..
Tfdtnl tggnrv with the JSfggit dollar v«lm»
dctlenaled as the eoenlzant agency for the
-negotiation and approval of Indirect jost
rates and! where peosssary. rther rates tuch
»sfrlngebeneflt and computercaarge-out
rattaaT Qnca amggnry I*
tor a[particular Mnpr0^1
it i maioi lonf-term shift ir. Ihy df)!Ja;
oLtiie Fitriyra! award* lo the pfganiuiipr.. All
concerned Federal sgenciei th*II be given the
opportunity to participate in the negotiation
process, bu! after a rale hat been agree^s^.
upon it will be accepted by alt Frderal^^H |
agenciet. When a Federal sgenc) haa^^^ '
to believe that special operating facton
affecting its swards Bcceniiatr tpecial
indirect cott met in accordance with
paragraph D-5 above. It will, prior to the time
the rates are negotiated. noti*> the cogr.-uni
agency.
b. A nonprofit organization which hoi no1
pf.iHrtn.ly ».uKli.h»d'an indirect cot' rale
•ri
-------
~ut. uonmttoat
IL Empioyet morale, liaalth and walfar*
oorta and credit*
li Entertainment oott*
U. Cquipmeoi and other cepftaJ aapendlture* •
14. Fine* and penaltie*
IS. Friage benefit*
16. Idle fadlitie* and Idle capacity
V. bdependest reaearcb aad deveJopoeet
(reaerved]
U. Infurance aad indemnification
Jl Inlareit fund rauing. and Inveatmeat
•anagcmenl oo*t*
JO. Labor relation* coat*
XL Loaeea on other award*
tSL Ktninbenanoe and repair ooat*
IX Material* aad aupplie*
24. Meeting*, eon/erenee*
BS. Moaberthipa. aubtcnptiooa. aad
profeeafoaaj activity ooat*
28. Orgaalulion coat*
V. Overtime, extra-pay abift and araltoaifl
ptvmiua*
•L Page ŁB«rge* in profeaaiooa] faaraat*
2ft Participant aupport coat*
SO, Patral co*t*
tL Paaaloa plan*
S2. Plant aecurity ooata
~1 Preaward coat*
M. Profeaaional aervicc coet*
24). Profit* aad IOBM* on di*po*ib'on of
depreciable property or other capital
•aaeta
•S. Public mfanBaHoa aervtea eoat*
17. Publication and printing coat*
>& Reamng«meat and alteration cc -u
24. Recon veraion ooat*
«A JUcrwting cocta
41. Relocation coat*
42. Rental cotU
43. Royvltie* aad otber coat* for aee of
patent* asd copyright*
44, Severance pay
46. Soecialted aervfee tacffitw*
4&Taxe*
47. TenninaHon ooata
48. Trainiog and educatioa coat*
49. Traniportation coat*
SO. Travel coata
'Circular No. A-1ZZJ
>ofCoat
Paragraph* 1 through 50 provide principle*
to be applied in e*Ubli*biag tba allowabilitjr
•/certain item* of coat. The** principle*
apply whether a coat i* treated a* direct or
bdirect Failure to enaction e particoltr itaa
of coat i* aot intended io Imply that it ia
tnallowable; ratbar determiaatioo aa to
•tlowabiliry in aadi c**e afaould be ba**d on
the treatment or principle* provided for
r or related Item* of coat
a. Adwrtialag ooat* mean m* coata of
aarvtoea aad auodated coat*. Media
mio* magarinn*. new*
miHi Mrvux*. (nij aw diipo**! at wirpla*
taitritli acqiiired la tb* perio/nance of m»
•ward exeepi when organiaationi are
raioiburted for diipoaal* at • prcdiienoified
•mount In accordance with Attachacal N of
OMB Ocular A-lltt or ffv) «f»ctfk
rwquirenient* of tb* award,
t Bodfcbl* Bad debt*, tedudiof loaaea
fwhetbei actual or a*o»atedj arlnog from
aejooUactrble aooooata aad otber claim*.
related ootUctioo coat*, aad rmlated loyal
eoau. an anaHowabia.
S. Sid anfpropc»af oaaO. (raaarvad j
4. Bonding coat*.
•, Boadlag coat* aria* wKen the
financial loa* to iteetf or omen by reaaeo of
the act or default of tW ortmatn Boo. They
•rtae ebo b fevtaaoae wher* the arganixabao
require* efmilar ewanutce. Included are eucb
bead* a* bid performance, payment.
advance payment tefrtniament. aad fidelity
hood*.
b. Coat* of bonding required pgroanl to
•to term* of dw award are allowable.
c Coel* of fr**"**"*. required by tbe
•ffeatza DOB ta tbe gaearal conduct of It*
operation* are allowable to the axial that
auch boadtei b id aooortUnat wfth acnaxl
boalaeae practice aad the rmiee and premium*
art icaaooabl* nader (be drecBnataace*.
S. Gaei/itMueobbn coat*. Cacti incurred far
telephone aarvicea. bc*J aad long duunc*
telephone call*, telegram*, radicgxuia.
poelatf* and the Uka, an allowable.
& CotrtfKOfation for ptfiaoa/ terriae*.
a. Definition. Companaatiafl for penoaal
aervioe* tadnrte* all eompaa*ation paid
eurtrtitly or accrued by (he organization for
aervice* of employe** reodcrad during tbe
period of tfaa award [except aa otfeerwue
provided In paragraph g. below). It tndadoa.
but la art United to, aaltrfa*. wage*.
director*! and executive eoaamJtLM member'*
feei. Incentive award*, firing* benefit*,
penatao pUa coata, allowance* for off-ait*
pay. tocanUva pay, location allowance*.
Mrdablp pay. aad oo*t of living difTtreatial*.
b. AHomtulitf. Eatoapt u otharwiae
apedUBLBally ptoirfkiad in thi* p*nigr*ph tbe
ooata of Meb mcnpcnxtioo arc allowable to *
tb* extent that
(I) Total oonpaaaatlao to tadlvidu*]
•mploye** If naaooable for tfaa aarvioaa
naodatad aad aoafonu to tte aatablifbad
policy o/ tba otjmnlntioo cooiiJlaaUy
applied to both Corensotnt aad i
Covemment activltiaa; and
(2) Cb«rye* to award* whether treated ai
direct or indirect ooata an determined aad
mpportad aa required *» &ia paratraph.
ndio and UJrvUtcm progrmaa. diract Bull
•xhiUu, and tbe tike.
b. Tbe only advertUinf coat* afiowabta ara
fboee wbtcb ara aolely for (i) tbe recruitment
a/panooaei wbm emuidered in ooofunctico
wld> all other recruitment coata. aa aai forth
(1) When tba orfanlxatioB t» pradominantly
aa<*«ed ID actlvftte* otbar thaa tboae
apoojortd by tfaa Coranunent ooapenaatfoo
far employee* on CoT*rntten(lant poicy of axpanaing achta]
payioeDt* to, or OB behalf of. employ*** or
•PubU.hcd by THE BURZAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS. INC.. WASHINGTON. ».C. 20037
D-7
-------
former eespkr/ws* (or aoatnploymeat
compensation or workmen'* compensation.
such payment* are allowable in the year of
payment with the prior approval of the
awarding agency provided they are allocated
lo ail ectivtti** of iba organisation.
(4) Coat* of insurance on the live* of
trustees, officer*, or other employees holding
rrgf'^"!!* of aimilar reeponslbUity are
allowable only to the extant that the
insurance repretents additional
compensation. The ooets of such Jnsuranoe
when tb« organisation ii named aa
beneficiary are eaallowable.
f. AaanM flat ooets. v
(1) Cost* ct aatfgnad ta a grvra fiacal yearv
ere funded for all plan partidpanta within alx
mootha after the end of that year. However.
tacraaae* to normal and paat tervice pentioo
coet* caoaed by a delay in funding the
actuarial Uability beyond 90 day* after each*
quarter of the year to which aach coat* are
ataigaabk are unallowable.
(2) Peoatoa plan termination tnrarance
premlom* paid portuaat to the Employ**
Retirement income Security Act of 1974 (Pub.
L 83-IOB) are aflowable. Lat* payment
charge* on each nrvminnt are onaUowabla.
(31 fTfriae t^y^f on
defidencie* and other penaltiaa impoaed
mder the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act art onaflowable,
h. bncmntir* oompeiuatiaa. mcentive
ootapooMtion lo employee* baaed on coat
rednctioB, or efficient performance.
•mOBeflnB award*, aafaty award*, etc, ere
allowable to ne extant that the overall
eoBpataatfon U determined to be reaaonable
and neb co*t* are paid or accrued purauant
IB an agreement entared into is good faith
between the efganiiatiaa and the employee*
Dexore the tervioet were rendered, or
pnmtaat lo an eatabliahed plan followed by
(he organixalioa to conaiatentry aa ta imply.
B effect an agreement to Bake aueh
payment
L Overtime. exM per/eA#t OK? waftisA^t
pemmiumt. See paragraph 27s
L Sere/em* fay. See paragraph 44.
L Training ana education coats. See
paragraph 48.
L Support of eofarfae and wagn.
(1) Charge* to awards for talari** and
•rag**, whether treated as direct ooets or
Bdirect costs, wCl be baaed oa documented
payroll* a^mad by a reepootfblt nffldaUt)
Of the orgeriteatifai The distribution of
•alarie* end wage* to award* Buet be
•epported by pefwjBael activity reports aa
preecrtbed to eobparagnph (21 below, except
when a subetltnte eyvlea hat been apprvred
B writing by the tfae oogrdsant agency. (See
paragraph sU of Attachment A)
[I] Report* reflecting the distribution of
activity of each employee atiul be
maintained for all itaJT meeaben
(profe*»ional* and nooprofe**ional») who*e
conpenaatioa U charged, in whole or in past
directly to award*. In addition, in order to
•vpport the allocation of Indirect coat*, tueh
report* mual al*o be maintained for other
employee* whoee work involve* two or more
faadtoa* or actMtie* If a diatributioo of their
eompen*ation between inch function* or
activitia* it needed in the determination of
the organisation'* Indirect coat n.te» (eg,
en employee engaged part-time la indirect
ooat ectivitie* and part-time la a direct
function). Report* maintained by nonprofit
crganiaationa to tatiafy meae requirement*
•Boat meet tfae following ttandarda:
(a) The report* mu*t reflect aa cfltf-tt*-
/bct determination of the actual activity of
each employee. Budget eatimate* {U,
eettmaU* detenuned before the tervice* an
performed] da act qualify a* rapport for
•barge* to award*.
(b) Each report Boat account for the total
activity for which employee* are
compeaaaled and which i* required ta
fulfillment of their obligatkxi* to the
qrganfTaflnn
(c] The reporta nwat be algBed by the
individual employ**, or by a reaprmtihle
•upervUory offidal having fint hand
knowledge of the activities performed by the
employee, mat the diatrlbatton of activity
rvpreaenta a reaaooable eatlmat* of the
actual work performed by tfae employee
during the period* turf aied by the report*.
(d) The report* But be prepared at leeat
Bonthly and most coincide with one or more
pay period*.
(9) Charge* for the aalariee aad wage* of
BOBprofeaaloaal employee*, to addition to the
npporting documentation described in
eubparagraph* (1] and (2) above, muat alao
be anpported by record* indicating the total
Bomber of hour* worked each day
maintained la oonfonnance with Department
of Labor regulation* implementing the Fair
Labor Standard* Act (29 C7R Part SIB). For
thi* pnrpoea. the tern -BOBprafeatienal
employee" ahall have the aame meaning e*
"ncnexempt employee." aader the Fair Labor
Standard* Act
(4) Salarie* aad wage* of employee* need
gŁ rnefftlnfl coal •h*^*^ of nijti*hiftg
requirement* on award* muat be tup ported m
ly^ gji^u Q^QQef •• aaLuiet en^ wage*
claimed for reimburaeaeat from awarding
egende*.
7. Contingency prvYttiant. Coetribatioo* to
• contingency reterv* or any aimilar
proviaion Bade far event* the occurrence of
which cannot be foretold with certainty a* to
tine, tntenalry. or with an aaenraace of mek
happening, are unallowable. The term
"contingency reeerve" exclude* eelf-
in*arance reaenrea (aee paragraph li(3} and
Iia42)
-------
method* once used ihall not be changed
unless approved In advance by the cognizant
Federal agency. When the depredation
method it introduced for eppu'catioo to asset*
previously »ub|rd to a use allowance. the
combination of u*e allowance* and
depredation applicable to such itttti must
not exceed (he lotal acquisition oast of tltt
*«*et*. When the depredation method U used
for building*. • building '« shell may be
segregated Iron each building component
(e.g.. plumbing lytlem. besting. and air
conditioning system. etc.) and eech lUnj
depreciated over iu estimated useful life; or
the entire building (U. the shell tod til
component*} may be treated af • aiagl* asset
•nd depreciated over • tingle useful life.
I When the depredation method IM need
for • particular das* of assets. no • .
depreciation may be allowed on any inch
•Mel* that, under paragraph a. abova, would
be viewed •• fully depredated. However, a
reasonable use allowance nay be Defoliated
for tucb aueta if warranted after taking into
conaideratioo the amount of depredation
previously charged to Ike Government the
estimated useful life remaining at time «f
negotiation, the effect of t increased
nainteaanoe charge* or oWvased efficiency
due to age, and any other factor* pa Uncut to
the utilization of the a*wt for the purpose
contemplated.
g. Charge* for uae allowance* or
depreciation au*t be *upparted by adequate
property record* and physical inventories
touat be taken at lean once every two yean
(a statistical sampling basis la acceptable] to
ensure thai ataet* exiat and are uaable and
needed. When the depredation method U
followed, adequate depreciation record*
Indicating the amount of depreciation taken
each period muat also be maintained.
10. Donation*
a. Service* received.
(1) Donated or volunteer cervices may be
furnished to an organization by profe*aioaal
and technical pertonneL ceaaultaati. and
other (killed and unskilled tabor. The value
i bur
ttx awud ot u»«f U> meet
(BJ The yaitia of thf tjpp*ta/untoar avrnbas. Rate* for
vohmteen shall b* eocsUtent with those
regular rate* paid for similar work (n other
•ctivida* of the orgaateatioa. la nases where
the kind* of skill* Involved art not found in
the other art vttie* of the oryaalxation. the
rate* used shall be consistent with those paid
tat similar work m the labor market m which
the orguizatioa competes for psch skills.
(b) Servian donated by other
ertanitadonf. When an employer donate* .
the service* of an employee, these service*
•hall he valued at the employee's regular rate
at pay (axdusiv* of fringe benefit* and
••direct costs) provided the services are to
the same skill for which the employee ia
DoraaUy paid. If the service* an not m the
•am* aid!] for which tha employee U normally
paid, fair market value shall be computed IB
accordance with nbpangnph (a) above.
D. Good* fiflospoco.
. (1) Donated goods: t«, expendable
persona} Bftr-my /supplies, and donated use
of space may M famished to an organization.
^tm value f &* ^ •&»«» i ot
reimbursable either as a direct or indirect
(2) The value of the donation* may be used
%B meet coat sharing or •"lf*<"g share
requirements under the conditions described
m Attachment & OMB Circular No. A-110.
The value of the donations shaJl be
determined ia accordance with Attachment
K. Where donations are treated as indirect
costs, indirect cost raias will separate the
value of the donations so that reimbursement
will not be made.
11. EBiphyvs morale. hecJtti, and welfare.
eofU and crtdttt. The coats of house
publications, health or first-aid clinics, and/
«Infirmaries, recre* flood activities.
employe*** eoasaaliag service*, and other
expense* incurred in accordance with the
organization's established practice or castom
Cor the improvement of working conditions,
employer-employee relations, employee
•oral*, and employee performance are
allowable. Such costs will be equitably
apportioned to aH activities of the
organisation, income generated from any of
these activities will b* credited to the cost
thereof unless such income has been
Irrevocably set over to employee welfare
organizations.
12. Entfrtainmait cor At. Cost* of
oiuMmeol dlvcnioa sods) activities,
ceremonial*, aad ooeta relating thereto, such
ew meala, Inrfglng. rentaJs. trmnaportatioo. aad
gratuities are unallowable (but see
paragraph* 11 tod 2S}.
, 13. Equipment and other capital'
expenditure*.
a. At «aed in mis paragraph, the fbOowmg
i have the •"""'»<«- set forth below:
(1) "Equipment" means an article
Boaexpendablt tangible personal pc
, having s useful life of more ihan.twt
and as acquisition co«t of 1500 or m-
•nit. An organization may utr its o*
deflnitioo provided that it at bait in
•ooexpendable tangible personal pn
4efin«d herein.
(2) "Acquisition cost" mesna the D
fevoice unit price of sja lt«D of equip 1
toduding the cost of any modificatio
attachment*, accessories, or anxiliar
apparatus necetsary to make it usab
purpose for which It is acquired. Ane
charges, such as taxes, duty, protecti
frwtsit insurance, freight and irutuBi
thai! be included in or excluded froff
acquisition cott.ln accordance with t
organization'* regular written accour
practice*.
(3) "Sped*] purpose equipment" m
equipment which is usable only for n
medical tdentific, or technical sctivi
Example* of tpedal pwpoee equips*
iaclude microscope*, x-ray machine*
Instruments, and spectrometers.
{4} "General propose equipment B
equipment which is usable for ether i
research. DtdicaL scientific, or techn
activities, whether or not epedsl
Modifications are needed to make thi
Writable for • particular purpose. Exa
general puipust equipment include oi
equipment and furnishings, air condJt
equipment, rtpioductioo tad printing
•quipment motor vehicle*, and aatoa
data processing equipment
b. (1) Capital expenditure* for gene
purpose equipment are unallowable a
direct cost exuept with bit prior appn
the awarding agency.
(2) Capital expenditure* for tpeda?
•quipment are allowable as direct cos
provided that items with a unit cost oi
or more have the prior approval of tb«
•warding agency.
C Capital expenditure* for land or
^Mitig. arc unallowable as a direct i
except with the prior approval of the
awarding agency.
d. Capital expenditures for improve]
to land, buildings, or equipment which
Materially Increase their value or usef
are unallowable as a direct cost excep
the prior approval of the awarding age
a. Equipment and other capital
expenditure* art unallowable a* indlrt
eoat*. However, tec paragraph 9 for
eJlowability of «se allowances or
depredation on buildings, capital
Improvements, and equipment Also, »
paragraph 42 for ailowability of rental
for land, building*, and equipment
14. Fine* and ptnaltie*. Coat* of fine
penalties resulting from violations of. c
failure of the organization to comply w
Federal Stats, and local law* and regu
crt unallowable except when incurred
result of compliance with specific prcr
el u award or ioatructioaa in writing C
HM awarding agency.
1ft. friflfe benefit*. See paragraph ft..
IB. Me fociJitjet and id It capacity.
a. As used In this paragraph the folio
tarns have the meaning* set forth belcr
fl) Tadlltiea* means land and build
any portion thereof, equipment iadivids
Published by THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS, INC., WASHINGTON. D.C. 20C37
-------
or collectively, or any ouier tarunbie capital
asset, wherever located, ami whether owned
or leased by the organization.
12} "Idle facilities" means complexly
unused facilities that tr» excess to the
organization'* current need*.
(3) "Idle capacity" mean* the muted
capacity of partially used facllitie*. It li the
difference between that which a facility
could achieve under 100 per cent operating
lime on a one-shift bssi* let* operating
interruption* resulting tram time lott for
repair*, setups, unsatisfactory materials, and
other normal delays, and tie extent to which
the facHlty wa* actually used lo meet
demands during the accounting period. A
•uttiahlfl baaia nay be used If II can be
shown that thii amount of usage could
normaDy be expected for the type of facility
Involved.
(4} "Cotti of Idle fecttiUee or idle capacity"
mean* cott* iuch a* maintenance, repair.
housing, rent and other related costs; cj..
property tatxe*. Insurance, sad depredation
or use allowance*.
b. The coats of idle facilities are
unallowable except lo the extent that
(1) They are unnecessary to meet
fluctuation* is workload; or
(2) Although aot necessary to met
fluctuation* in workload, they were
necessary when acquired and are now idle
because of change* in program requirements,
efforts to achieve more economical
operations, reorganization, termination, or
other cause* which could not have been
reasonably foreseen. Under the exception
•tsted in this subparagraph. coats of idle
facilities are allowable for a reasonable
period of time, ordinarily not to exceed one
year, depending upon the initiative taken to
use. lease, or dispose of such facilities (but
see paragraphs 47i. and d.).
c. The costs of idle capacity are normal
costs of doing business and are a factor in the
normal fluctuations of us«ge or ipdireci cost
rates from period to period. Such costs are
allowable, provided the capacity is
reasonably anticipated lo be necessary or
was originally reasonable and is subject to
reduction or elimination by subletting.
renting, or saJe. In accordance with sound
business, economics, or security practice*.
Widespread idle capacity throughout ma
entire facility or among a group of asset*
having substantially the same function may
be idle facilities.
17. i'iii yf.-ident srseorcA and development
(ReservtJi
18. Insurance and indemnification.
• a. Insurance include* insurance which the
organization is required to cany, or which is
approved, under the terms of the award and
•ny other insurance which the orgsaiiation
maintains in connection with the general
conduct of its operations. This paragraph
does aot apply to insurance which represents
fringe benefits for employee* (se« paragraph
B f. and e^-U)).
Ill Covts of insurance required or
aprrovexL and maintained, pursuant to the
ewani «.-* allowable.
(2) Costs of other Insurance meiiifnined by
the organisation to cormacMon with the
general conduct of its operations sre
allowable sublet lo the foUowiitg limitations.
(a; lypet and cxlem ot coverage snail CM
tn accordance with sound business practice
•nd the rates and premiums shell be
reasonable under the circumstance*.
(b) Cost i allowed for butineii Interruption
or other similar Insurance shaft be limited to
exclude coverage of management fees.
(c) Cost* of insurance or of any provisions
for a reserve covering the risk of loss or
damage to Government property are
allowable only to the extent that the
organization is liable for such loss or damage.
(d) Provision* for • reserve under • self-
Insurance program are allowable to the
extent that type* of coverage, extent of
coverage, rates, and premiums would have
been allowed had Insurance been purchased
to cover the risk*. However, provision for
. knowo or reesonably etttmeted self-insured
liabilities, which do not become payable for
more then one yesr after the provision is
made shall not exceed the present value of
the liability.
-------
c./goruuiijon. are unallowable except with
prior approval of the • wurdiag agency.
Z7 Ovfrtime. txLro-pay thifl and
multithift premium*. fVemium* for overtime.
•xl/4-pay ahj/U, and multiahift work are
aJi0»«U< only wiih th* piior appruv*! of lh«
•warding ayeoc} except:
a. When oeceu&r} lo cope with
etaeryencif*. *ud> u lbo«c resulting [TDD
•ua JanU. natural dif aiten. breakdown* of
•s'-tipmeot. or otcacional operitional
, bof.'.cae^j of a aporadic nature.
b. When employe** are perforaitig uulirecl
function* auch a* *dnufuitraUoo.
c In (be performiuct of i**U. Ubortlury
fjruc«dur«c, i* other ajmilor operative* whirl
• •/* uxituuoua to nature tod cannot
iMsmubly be interrupted or otherwUe
completed
d When lower overall coat to the
Cove.ixmeat will reault.
2ft. Ajg* cjiajyc* in pnfeitionoi joumalt.
»Vge cbairge* (or profe*aiooaj journal
publication* an allowable aj • ae«e»«aiy
|*art of reteerch. coal*, where:
au The fe»e*rca paper* report work
Mppartad by the Government and
Ik Tba dtarge* art levied impartially on al)
research paper* publiabed by the journal
whether or aot by Government -*pan*ored
•ulhor*.
2B. Parlicipoat tuppoft cottt. Participant
•nppofl co*la art direct coat* for item* »uch
*s rtpendi or *ull*uttence allowance*. travel
allowance*. and regiitraUon fee* paid lo or
en behalf of participant* or trainee* (bul not
employee*) in connection with meeting,
conference*. tynpoaia. or training project*.
Titete coat* are allowable with (be prior
approval of tba awarding agency.
at Coal* of (I) preparing diadoaurea,
KporU. and other document* required by the
•ward and of ae«rcLing (be art lo the extend
DecRsaory to nuke aucb diacloaurei. (il)
preparing document* and any other patent
coata la cowiectjoo with the filing and
pmaetiiUon of* United atates pa lent
applicalloo wbetr title or royalty-free license
If rwjutmf by the CovcrnnMrat to be
conveyed lo the GovermoenL and (iil) generml
couaaeling aervicet reUliog lo patent and
oapyriaht matter*, aucb aj advice on patent
and copyrigiil law*. reyulaUoci. clavue*. and
employee agreemaata an allowable (bul a««
paragnpfa 94).
b. Coal of preparing dladoaure*. reporii.
awd other documenti and of aearcbing the art
to the extent neocMary to matte difdntum,
if Dot rujjuirti b> the award, arc
•oaL'owable- Q»U in connection with (i)
filing tad prosecuting any foreign patent
•pp.'^*tJon. or (li) any United Stalei patent
•ppliutioc. whttrc the award doe* tivl
raquira oooveyicg title or • royally-free
Bceaae to the Government are unallowable
(aUo aee paragraph 43).
n. Petition p.'ant See paragraph 0. g.
K. fleet tfcurity cottt. Necvwary
ampattfea Incurred to comply with
Covernewnl accurily rVquiremenU or for
CacUltie* prol*ctioa. Including wagea. •
•njfonn*. and •qulpmant of pertonael are
aOlowable.
jj rrLOwaro eot'J Prveward cotti are
Ihoie incurred prior to !hr effective dale of
Utc *ward directly pursuant to (Ke
B*t[oiiition and in anticipation of the award
where tuch co*U ii necFtiitr)- lo comply with
the propjMd deUvery ichedaJe or period of
p«r/onaajice. Such coc* are atlotvab'e only
lo the ext;nl thai they wojjd have brro
allowable If incurrrii «fter the d«le of the
•ward and ooly with the written approve! of
th« awarding agency.
*4 Prvfeuiono! terrict eostt.
a. CotU of piv/i-nionil atd conaultant
aei vice* i«ndered by peraoni wbo are
neinUen of a particular profeaaion or poaa«at
• epecial kLilL antl who ere not officer* or
aroploya«« of (be organization, are allowable.
•ubjest lo b. c, and d. of thl» paragraph wbea
Ma*ooable la relation lo the aervicri
rerdered and when out contingent upon
recovery of the cotu from the Covemment.
b. la deutn&iitg the allowably of coata in
• particular caae. no aingle factor or ajiy
afrtcifl cembination of factor* i* aecciMrily
detenalnative. However, the following
fnctor* are rale van L
(1) The nature and acope of the aanice
(vndered IB raUtioo lo the acrvice raquired.
t"< The aeeeaaity of conimctjng for the
a*-i. io». oaoaidering the organiaatioo'a
capability in the particuJaj- area.
(JJ Tbe pan pattere of auch oo*U.
particularly la the year* prior to Goveruneut
•ward*.
(4) Tbe impact of Government award* on
the organization'* buainet* (Le, what rcw
problem* ha ve an*en J.
(5) Whether the proportion of Covermueni
«rori to the orgtoiutian't total btuineM i*
aticfa a* to influence the organization in favor
of incurring the co*L particularly where the
••ervice* rendered are not of a continuing
nature and have little nlaUouhip lo work
mder Government grant* and contract*.
(0) Whether the aetvioe CM be performed
•ore economically by direct employment
rather than contracting.
(7) The qualification* of the individual or
concern rendering the aerviue and the
customary fee* charged aspedajjy on aon-
Covvm&eRt award*.
(0} Adequacy of the contractual agreement
for the cervice (e.g.. detoiption of the tervice.
estimate of time required, rate of
coapenaaUon. end termination provtc'on*].
C. b> addition to the factor* in paragraph b
above, retainer fee* lo the allowable muil be
supported by evidence of bona fide •erviee*
•vailnble or rendered.
d. Co*I of legal accounting, and consulting
aervinet. and related oo*t* incurred in
connection wfth defenae of antitnwt *uit*.
•nd the proeecution of claiau again*t the
Government, are unallowable, Co*l* of leg«L
accounting and coojulting terviee*. and
related co*ti, incurred in connection with
petrol infringement litigation, organization
and reorganization, are unallowable unle«*
•Hherwlte provided for in the award (but aee
paragraph 47e).
35. Profit* and/offft on diipotition of
depreciable property or other capital oueu.
a. (Ij Cain* and lo**e* on *ale, retirement.
or other di*po*ition of depreciable property
•ball be included In the year in which they
occur a* credit* or charge* to coat frouplngf«)
In which the deprrcinlinn appFic
property wai included. The *rao
gain or lo»i to be included *i * c
ch«f>'«- la the ippropriite cott gr
•hail be the difference between t
re&lued t"> the properly «nd the-
undt^rcti*icd b*iit of the prape
(2) Cain* and lo**ei on. the (ft*
depreciable proprrfy thaD not be
•t a *ep*r*te credit or charge urn
foUowtnf condition*.
ia| The aain or lo*i i* procet»ei I
(fepreci^liofi reterve arcasnt and
IB the depreciation allowable und
paragraph 9.
(bj Tie property i* gives ia esc
part of Che purcha*e price of* no:
•nd the gain or lot* i* taken into *
detersirmtg the drprrciaooti co*t
Dew Item.
(cj A k»* reaulu {rom the failur
•aaintaJn penniiiible inturence. e:
otherwise provided in paragripb I
(d) Compenaation for the ate of
property wet provided through u»
•ilowuce* in lieu of depreciation
accordance with paragraph 9.
(e) Cain* and loa*e* ariaing frtm
•ztreordinary aatcs. retirrment*. o
di*po*ition* *hall be couidertd or
by-caie be*i*.
b. Cain* or ioe*e* of any nature i
from the aele or exchange of prope
tban the properry covered in parag
above ihaU be excluded in comput
co*u.
S&. Public info.i«ativt> terrier an
a. Public information acrvice cost
(ae ooct auociated with pamphlet*
rele**e*. and other fora* of informi
•erviee*. Such coeu are nonaatly IB
(1) Inform or tnatruct individual*.
(be general public.
(2) Intern! individual* or group* i
pArticipatiBg in a aervice program a
etgaaitatJuo.
(3) Oi**eminate the result* of »poi
•nd ooncpanaored activitici.
•b. Public information aervice coeti
allowable a* direct cott* with the pr
approval of the awarding agency. Su
•re unallowable a* indirect co*U.
97. Publication and printing ootu
a. Publication cost* include the cot
printing (including the procene* of
competition, plate-making, pros wo:
binding, and the end product* produt
•urh proce»*e(). dUtribution. pomot
mailing, and genera! handling
b. If them coat* art nst idenfifiabft
particular co*< objective. (he> ehould
allocated a* indirect cott* to «fl ben*
•clivitic* of the organization.
c. Publication and printing co*t* an
unallowable a* direct co«t» ecept wi
prior Approval of the swardjng »jerrrj
d. Tlit coil of page nhergp* in joum
•ddre;*ed paragraph 2f
IB. Rearrangement ard alteration ex
Co*'* inmrred fcr ordinary or aormal
reamngrmeot and alteration of f*cilit
•Jlowabie. Special •rranpemearand
•Itentioa co*t* icnirred tpecifically fi
project are allowable wi'b the prior tf
of the awarding agency.
90. Reconvert ion cost*. Cost* incum
the restoration or rehabOiUtion of the
Publiched by THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS. FA'C.. WASHINGTON, O.C. 20O37
-------
organization'* fadlitie* to approximately Ih*
Mine condition exitting immediately prior to
conuDtoocBitBl of Govewjent award*, fair
wear and ts-ar exempted, are allowable.
40. Atcmiting ceatt. The following
recruiting eotu are allowable: coal of "kelp
wanted" advertiilng. operating emu of an
employment office. cost* of operating an
educational letting program, travel expense*
Including food and lodging of employe**
whil* engaged la recruiting personnel, b-avel
coat* of applicant* for interview* for
prospective employment, and relocation cost*
incurred Incident 10 recruitment of oew
employ*** (Me paragraph 41 c). Where the
organization MM employment agencies,
easts not to exaee* of standard commercial
rate* for each service* an allowable.
41. Relocation cattt.
a. Relocation cost* are oo*t» incident to the
permanent change of duty assignment (for an
indefinite ported or for a stated period of pot
leu than 12 month*) of an exitting employee
or ttpon recruitment of a new employee.
Relocation ooet* are allowable, subject to the
limitation described in paragraph! b, c, and d.
below, provided that:
(1) The move to for the benefit of the
employer.
(2) Reimbursement to the employee to hi
accordance with an established written
policy oonttotentiy followed by the employer.
(3) Tbe reimbursement doe* not exceed the
employee'* actual (or reaMoably estimated )
expense*.
b. Allowable relocation cotU for current
employe** are limited to the following:
(1) The CMta of transportation of the
employee, member* of bit Immediate family
and hi* household, tod personal eflecl* to the
new location.
(2) The co*ti of finding a aew home. *uch
•* advance trip* by employee* and spouse*
la locate living quarter* and temporary
lodging diving the transition period, up to a
maximum period of 30 days, Including
advance trip time.
(3) Cicala* co*t*. ndb a* brokerage, legal,
and appraiaal fees, incident to the di*po*ition
of the employee'* former borne. The*e co*U.
together with those described la (4) below.
are limited to ( per cent of the taJe* price of
the employee'! former home.
(4} The continuing coat* of ownership of
the vacant former horn* after the settlement
or leate date of the employee's new
permanent home, rucb a* maintenance of
building* and ground* (exclusive of fixing up
expense*). atilitie*. tax**, and property
insurance.
(5) Other necectary and reasonable
expense* aormaUy incident to relocation.
such a* the coat* of cancelling an nnexpired
loaae, disconnecting **"^ reinstalling
household appliance*, aod purchaiing
Insurance again* t loas of or damage* to
personal property. The coat of cancelling an
•nexpired lease to limited to three time* the
•Kmthly rental.
e. Allowable relocation coets for new
employee* are limited to tho*a d/acribed in
(1) and (2) at paragraph b. above. When
relocation coat* Incurred Incident to the
recruitment of new employee* hava been
allowed either as a dinct or Indirect coat ami
tbe employee resigns for reason* within hi*
control within IX month* after hire, the
ergsuiation thai] refund or credit the
Government for It* share of the cost
However, the co*t* of travel to an oversea*
location shall be considered travel co«ti in
accordance with paragraph SO and not
relocation coat* for the purpose of thi*
paragraph If dependent* art not permitted at
the location for any reason and the co*t* do
not Include coat* of transporting household
food*.
d. The following tort* related to relocation
are unallowable:
(l) Fee* and other oo*t» associated with
acquiring • sew home.
(2) A low on (he sale of • former borne.
(3) Continuing mortgage principal and
interest payment* on a home being told.
(4) Income taxet paid by an employee
Klated to reimbursed relocation coat*.
42. Htntai aottt.
a. Subject to the ttmitition* deaeribed In
paragraph* b. through d. of thto paragraph.
rental ooat* are allowable to the extent that
the rate* are reasonable In Hght of *uch
factor* at: rental coat* of comparable
property, if any. market ooodlrkms tn the
area; alternative* available; cad the type, life
expectancy, cutuiitioix. end valoa 01 tne
property leased.
b. Rental coat* under sale and Uaseback
wraageaent* are allowabl* only up to the
amount that would be allowed had tbe
organization continued to own the property.
c Rental co*tt under lea*>thaa-length
fca*e* are allowable only up to the amount
that would b* allowed had title to the
property veated In the organisation. For thi*
purpose. • le**-lhan-arm*-length lea*e to one
tmder which one party to the lease agreement
to able to control or substantially Influence
die actions of the other. Such leases include.
but are sot limited to thoae between (i)
division* of an organization: (ii) organisations
under common control through common
officer*, directors, or member*: and (iii) an
organization and a director, trust**, officer.
or key employee of the organization or hi*
Immediate family either directly or through
corporation*, traata. or ainilar arrangement*
In which they bold a controlling interest.
d. Rental coat* under lease* which create a f
material equity In the leased property are
Allowable only op to tbe amount tliat would
be allowed had the organization purchased
the piuperty on the dale the lease agreement
wa* executed: «.g_, depredation or uw
allowance*, maintenance, taxes, insurance
but excluding interest expense and other
unallowable coals. For thto purpose, a
material equity in tbe property extols If the
base In noacaacelable or to cancelable only
upon the occurrence of some remote
contingency and ha* one or nor* of the
following characteristic*:
(1) The organization ha* tbe right to
purchase the property for • price which al the
beginning of the leas* appear* to be
substantially las* than the probable fair
market value at the tim* It to permitted to
purchase the piupeity (commonly called a
lease with a bargain porchaw option):
(2) Title to tbe property passe* to the
organization at acme time during or after die
Igggn period:
(S) Tbe term of th* laaM (initial term plus
periods covered by bargain renewal options,
if any) Is equal to 75 per cent or more of the
economic life of the ieiied properly: I.e.. the
period the property I* expected to be
economically usable by one or more user*
4S. Koyoltitt end other co*U for use of
patents and copyright*. ^^ .
a. RoyslSei on • pitent or copyright tj^^A )
amortization of the co*t of acquiring by ^^^ '
purchase a copyright, patent, or right*
thereto. n*ce*»*ry for the proper performance
of the *ward •« *llowible unleta:
(1) The Government hai * licente or the
right to free use of the patent or copyright.
(2) The patent or copyright ha* been
•dedicated to be invalid, or has been
•dminfstratively determined to be Invalid.
(3) The patent or copyright to coniidered to -
be unenforceable.
(41 The patent or copyright I* expired.
b. Special care ihould be exerdwd in
determining reason*blene** where the
royalties may have been arrived at a* a result .
of Ie*» then arm'* length bargaining: e.g.:
(1) Royaltiet p*!d to pertbn*. including
corporation*, affiliated with the organization.
(2) RoyaJtie* paid to nnaffiliated parties.
Including corporations, under an agreement
entered into in contemplation that a .
Government award would be made.
(3) Royaltie* paid under an agreement
entered into after an award i* made to an
organization. . •
c In any case involving a patent or
copyright formerly owned by the
organization, the amount of royalty allowed •
ahouid not exceed the co*t which would have.
been allowed had the organization retained
title thereto.
44. Severance pay.
a. Severance pay. alio commonly referred
to a* di*mlt*al w*ge*. to a payment in ^^_
addition to regular «atsrie* and wages. J^^k \
organization* to worker* whole emplojH^ /
I* being terminated. Co*tt of severance pSy
•re allowable only to the extent that in each
case, it to required by (i] law. (ii) employer-
employee agreement (iii) established policy [
that constitutes, in effect an implied :
agreement on the organization'* part, or (rv)
circumstance* of the particular employment.
b. Co«t* of severance payment* are divided '.
into two categoric* a* follows:
(1) Actual normal trunover severance
payment* *h*D be allocated to all activities-
or. where the organization provide* for a *
reierve for normal severance* tuch method
will be acceptable if the charge to current
operations i* reatonable in light of payments
actually made for normal severance* over a
repreienUtive past period, and if amount*
charged are allocated to all activities of the
organization.
(2) Abnormal or mass severance pay is of
euch a conieetura! nature that measurement
of cost* by mean* of an accrual will not
achieve equity to both parties. Thu*. accru*!*
for thto purpose are not allowable. However.
the Covemmeet recognizes It* obligation to
participate to the extent of it* fair *htre. in
any specific payment. Thus, allowability will
be considered on • ease-by-csse bail* in the
•vent of occunvftCŁ.
45. Specialised ttrrice fecilitiet.
a. The coats of service* provided by highly
complex or sp*dalized facilities operated by
the organization, such as electronic ^^^ \
Publi»h.d by THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS. INC.. WASHINGTON, D.C. 2003?
D-12
-------
7
provided the charge* /or the aarvion IBM!
the conditiooi of t ither b. or & of thi*
paragraph tad in add-tina lake ialo account
•ay Item* of iaca^ eward* ba»*d oa actaaJ aae^ of
•tt aervtoea «B the baai* of a achecUe of
•ale* or eeiafcliahed BMthodology that (I) doe**
•01 diacriBBiaate igahiit federally supported
•ctivinaa of the erpwiuBm tadiufcng uae«e
Ay thi crganturtnn far mlamaJ purpoaea. aad
Pf] <• rtiaigniJ to recover oajy the aggregate
•Mtiof taeaervioe*,Ta»oa»laafaach
•ervice a*aO oomtet naraseHy 4 both IU
aaract OB*** and I* •Bocable ahare of all
iadtracl ceett. Advaaoa *)greeaasta fniriuint
to paragraph AA of Attachment A are
•artkalariy ieaportaal a btia attnaaan.
* vVaanfMeoattaaa^lbraaarrtoa
an aot aMtoriaL (key a»ay be •Oocalad aa
Indirect agela.
b. Coatt coatinujjjg aflat trrmimL'on. IT la
a particular caaa. daapile all raaaooabie
efforti by the oraanUatioe, otrtaia coau
caaaot be diaoootinued laoedlaUly after the
a. b general, taxaa which the oracnizaaaa
h required lo pay aad which are paid or
accrued ta accordance with generally
accepted accounting principle*, and
payment* made to local govenmeate in ben
of taxe* which are onmrnenrorate witb the
fecal govmaneat aerrfcea racaJvad are
allowable, except for (i) taxea from which
• exemption* are available lo the organization
directly or which are.available to the
organization baaed oa aa exemption afforded
the Government and io the latter caae whea
the ewarding agency make* available the
aeceaaary exemption certificate*, (11) apecial
•aaeaameata on land which represent capital
improvement*, aad (Hi) Federal income taxe*.
b. Aay refund of laxea. and any payment to
the organization of iatereat thereon, which
«MR allowed a* award coda, will be
credited either aa a coat reduction or caah
refund, aa appropriate, to the Government
47. TtnninoLion ootlt. Termination of
•ward* generally gtve riae to the tocwrenca
of coata. or the aeed for apecial treatment of
eoata, which would not have arieen had the
•ward not bees terminated. Coat principle*
covering theae Item* are eel forth below.
They are to be uaed ia Gcojunctian with the
Other proviaioa* of thi* Circular to
termination aituatiooa.
a. Common Acme. The coat of item*
raaaonably ueable oa the organization'* other
work ahall not be allowable ualea* the
organization eubmita evidence thai It would
aot retain auch llama el coat without
•nttatntag a feet, to deciding whether each
Menu are reaaooabfy aaabie on other work of
the organization, the awarding ageocy ahould
eooaider the organization'* plan* and ordara
far cBrreai aad acaeduled activity.
Coat emporaaeoua porcaaae* of common
(tame by (he organization ahall be regarded
aa evideao* that each item* are reaaonably
ejaabie on the organization'* other work. Any
acceptance of noirnnon iiern* aa alfeeabla to
B> terminated portion of the a ward ehall be
acaiud to the extent that the onaatin'e* of
each item* on head, to Iranalt. aad on order
•re to axoaaa of the raaaoaaoie njamfttttive
MqttireaMBti of other work.
of termination, eneh coat* are
fenrrally allowaaJe wllUa the 1/MtaUoo* act
fcrtb In tale Qrcular, except the I any auch
onnt» BBrrtma'iM a/tar lamina &OB due to the
•aalifont or wtDful faUhn of the orftutlaaaoa
to dlanmtfmia each oaata thaO be
•nallowable:
«.iaw»ofae«^i/*aJba. tea* of aaarul vafw
e/ipedal teohaf. machlgary aad equipment
which MM e*f ehacped to (ha award aa a
•aprtaj expenditure it feaeratty aJloajahla fŁ
H) S«ch apadaJ tooHa*. awcaiaery.
bJy capable afaae ta
*a other work of the praaaautioa.
(2] The tatareat of the Coveraaent ia
avotactad by iraaiifer of ttde or by other
detmerf aporopriate by the awardiB|
•*»**«
•Bupired IMAM ore gaaantty eflowaUe •
Wueie doejrfy aB0wa to have been
raaaonabJy aaoaaaary far the performance of
ae terminated a ward ieae Ike raeiduaJ value
•f and) feaaea, if (1) Ike eaaont of asca rental
daisied ateee aot exairt tae re*_ooable KM
valoo of the property laaaad far the period of
tae award aid eodi fnrther period aa may be
•naoaable. and fli) the orgejjnancn nakea
all raaaooable axTuita to terestaate, aeatgit,
•ettle. or otherwiee redoce the ooet of aach
leaae. There ahw may be todaded the ooat of
•heraUoB*ofeBealeaa>d property, provided
auch alteraHonrwere aeceaaary far the
performance of the award and of reasonable
reetoration raiyrtrad by DM pi in'if ifffii of the
e»e*e.
a. SeaJmmt aapenaae. Settlement
tfxpenae* incrodtag the felfewteg are
generally allowable:
(1) Accoimtmg, legal derfcal. *sd etmflar
eoata reatonably aaceeaary for:
(a) The preparation and preeentaUoo to
•warding agency of aettlemenl claim* aad
•upporting data with racpact to the
terminated portion of the award valea* the
termination I* for default. (See paragraph 4-a.
of Attachment L. OMB Circular No. A-11B
•nd
(b) The UtrmiBaboB aad aenUment of
•ubawarda.
(2] Raaconable ooet* far the atcng«.
traniportatioa, proiaction. and diapoaitioa of
property provided by the Government or
acquired or produced for the award except
whea grantee* are nrimbvned far diapoaala
•t a predetermined amount to accordance
with Attachment N of OMB Circular A-110.
(3) Indirect poet* related to aalarie* aad
wage* Incurred aa aettlement expaaae* ia
•ubparagraph* (1] aad (2] of thi* paragraph.
Normally, auch indirect coat* ahall be liaulad
to fringe baaefila, ccotpaacy coat, and
temediala euperrlajen.
L CfaimM ff^^f ttifa a^infi Qalm* tfiA^t
•abawarda. mchtdtng the allocable pornoa of
daima which are """"v*" to the award aad
to other work of the organization are
generally allowable. Aa appropriate abara of
fee organization'* Indirect expenae may be
allocated to the amount of aatttement* with
•Bbcoatractor/Bubgraaiaea; provided that die
•recant allecatad ia otherwise frtt'-'mf
with the batie fuideliae* cootalned i
Attachment A. The indirect expense
allocated thai! exclude the aame aoc
coat* claiaed directly or indirectly a
aetlleir.:fit eitpeaie*.
tA Training ami tducatioa catti.
a. Coat* of prepare Uoa and aainte
• prograiB of ioitrucD'on inrli.^b^ 00
Ikaltad lo oa-the-|ob. daaaraoa. and
•ppnEDdcBahip training. de*ign*d to t
tfke vocatJo&al afiactive&e** of esopio
fcachKfim traJnl&| nMlerial*. textbook
•aJarie* or wagea of traiaeea («vtMi
•werttavi ffenpenaatinn which mighi i
tfcercfroaii and (i) aaUrie* of the dire
if ooaductad by lac argaaizaciaB; or (i
toittoe aad teea whea the trainiag i* e
toatitutoo aot operated by the argani:
•re aBowabla.
b. Coat* of parl-tima education, at a
•ndergradaata or poetgradaala miley
Jnrfinting thai provided a! the organic.
•wa facUibaa. are allowable only whi
ccorae or degree poraued i* atka've le
field ia which the employee ia BOW wi
or may raaaoaably be •'p*r*«i* to wa
•re limited to
(1) Training malarial*.
(2] Textbook*.
FftCf Ca^tiracs by thf fffopfT^fmi1*
(4) Tuitioa charged by the educating
laab'tution. or in lieu of tuition, in* true
aalarie* and the r»Uted ahare of todin
coat* of the educ* ^oo*J t&i&tuD'oa to I
extent that the aum thereof i* not ia ea
the tuitioo which would have ben paid
participating educational institution.
(5] Saiariet aad related coat* of inati •
who are employee* of the argasizatiao
(6) Straight-time oompeoaation of a*j
employee for time apcnt etteading claa
during working hour* aot ia axcew of I
Bonn par year and only ta the extent (t
circumatance* do aot permit the oparat
daaae* or attendance at claaaea after n
working hour*: otbarwiac auch crenpe.n
if unallowable.
c Coata of tuition, feea. training mala
and textbook* (but not *ub«iateoce, ul
any other easoluoent*! in connection w
fuU-tia>* education, <"^>"^'"g that prom
the organizatioo'e own faolitiea, at a
poetgraduate (but not undergraduate) e>
level, are allowable only whea the oour
degree punued i* related to the field ia
the employee i* BOW working or Buy
rea*onably be expected to •vk. and at
where the coal* receive the prior appro*
the awarding agency. Such ooata are lis
to the coat* attributable to a loul perioc
to exceed one achool year for each capl
ao trained, la uauaual caaea the period a
be extended
d Coata of attendance of up to M wee
per employe* per year at apeoalized
pragrama *peciŁcally de*ign«d to aolua
the effeco'venet* of execubve* or ataaaf
or to prepare employee* for *uch ft'tir
•re •fiowable. Such coau include earalb
{••a, training materiel*, textbook* aad
related charge*, employee*' aalariea,
•iihaUtence. and travel. Coat* allowable
•nder thia paragraph do aot iacbde too*
nniiiii that are part of a degree ariifiut
Publi«Jvrd kr THE BUKKAU Of NATIONAL AFFAIRS, DWC., WASHINGTON, D.C. 21X537
D-13
-------
curriculum, which are allowable only to the
extent »ef forth in b and c. above.
e. Maintenance expense, and normal
depreciation er fair reniaL on fscilitiet
owned or leaaed by the organization for
training purpose* are allowable to the extent
aet forth In paragraph* 0.22. and 42.
f. Contribution* or donation* to
educational or training tnstitvlions. Including
the donation of fsdlltiei or other propertie*.
and scholarship* or fellowships, are
unallowable.
a. Training and education oosta tn excess of
thnee otherwise allowable aider paragraphs
b. and c. of this paragraph may be allowed
with prior approval of the awarding agency.
To be considered for approval the
organization Bust demonstrate that such
eosls are consistently incurred pursuant to an
established training and education program,
and that the course or degree pursued U
relative to the field la which the employee is
DOW working or may reasonably be expectad
to work.
49. Transportation eottt. Transportation
eosts include freight, express, cartage, and
postage charges relating either to goods
purchased, in proceaa, or delivered. These
costs are allowable. When such costs can
readily be Identified with the item* Involved.
they may be directly charged a*
transportation coats or adkUd to the cost of
•uch items (see paragraph 23). Where
Identification with the materials received
cannr' readily be made, transportation eoata
may be charged to the appropriate indirect
eos! accounts if the organization follows a
consistent, equitable procedure la this
respect
50. Tnmlcottt.
a. Travel coats are the expenses for
transportsUoa. ^g^fl subsistence, and
rented items incurred by employee* who are
te travel status oa official business of the
organization. Travel coats are allowable
subject to paragraphs b. through a. below,
when they are directly attributable to specific
work under aa award or are mcnrred la the
normal course of administration of the
organization.
0- Such coats may be charged oa aa actual
basis, on a per diem or mileage basis in lien
of actual costs Incurred, or oa a combination
of the two. provided the method need results
tn charge* consilient with thoie normally
allowed by the organization to Its regular
Operations.
C The different* In coil between flnt-dais
air accommodations and less than first-els**
air aceomraodsttons It unallowable except
. when less than finl-clas* air
accommodations are not reasonably
available to meet necessary mission
requirements, inch as when less than first-
dais accommodations would (I) require
circuitous routing, (ii) require travel during
vnreasonable hours, (III) greatly increase the
duration of the flight, (Iv) result in additional
coats which would offset the transportation
•aving*. or (v) offer accommodations which
ere not reasonably adequate for the medical
needs of the traveler.
d. Necessary and reasonable costs of
family movements and personnel movements
of a special or mass nature are allowable.
pursuant lo paragraphs 40 aad 41, subject to
allocation on the basis of work or time period
benefited when appropriate. Advance
agreement* are particularly Important
a. Direct charges for foreign travel costs an
allowable only when the travel has received
prior approval of the awarding agency. Each
separate foreign trip must be approved. For
purposes of this provision, foreign travel I*
defined a* any travel outside of Canada and
the United Slates and Its territories and
possestions. However, for an organization
located in foreign countries, the term "foreign
travel" means travel outside that country.
[Circular No. A-122)
Attachment C
Nonprofit OifaaicatioDs not Subject to thia
Circular
Aerospace Corporation. E3 Segundo.
California
Argonne Universities Association. Chicago,
Illinois
Associated Universities, Incorporated.
Washington, D.C
Associated Universities for Research aad
Astronomy, Tucson. Arizona
Atomic Casualty Communion, Washington,
D.C
Battelle Memorial Institute, Headquartered m
Brookhaven National Laboratory.
New York
Center for Energy and Environmental
Retearch (CŁŁKj. {Utuvrrsil) o' Kjerts
Rico)
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. Charlei
Draper Laboratory, Incorporated
Cambridge, Massschusetts. Corapanrive
Animal Research Laboratory (CARL)
(University of Tennessee), Oakndgt.
Tennessee
Bnvironmcotal Institute of Michigan. Ann
Arbor. Michigan
Hanford Environmental Health Foundation,
RichJaud. Washington
ITT Research Institute. Chicago, Ulinoi*
Institute for Defense Analysis. Arlington.
Virginia
Institute of Gas Technology, Chicago. Dlinoii
Midwest Research Institute. Headquartered
in Kansas City. Missouri
Mitre Corporation. Bedford. Massachusetts
Montana Energy Research and Development
Institute. Inc. (MERDI). Buttt. Montana
National Radiological Astronomy
Observatory. Green Bank West Virginia
Oakridge Associated Unjversitiea. Oakridge.
Tennessee
Project Management Corporation. Oakridge,
Tennessee
Rand Corporation. Santa Monica, California
Research Triangle Institute, Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina
Riverside Research Institute. New York. New
York
Bendia Corporation, Albuqaerqne, New
Mexico
Southern Research bstfhita, Birmingham.
Alabama
Southwest Raeearch Institute, San An
Texas
SRI tetaraatfonaL Menlo Park. California
Syracuse Research Corporation. Syracuse,
New York
Universities Research Association,
Incorporated {National Acceleration Lab).
Argonne. Blinoi*
Universities Corporation for Atmospheric
Research, Boulder, Colorado
Nonprofit Insurance Companies such as Blue
Cross and Blue Shield Organizations
Other nonprofit organizations aa negotiated
with awarding agencies.
Publish.d by THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL. AFFAIRS. INC., WASHINGTON. D.C. 2OC37
D-U
-------
ATTACHMENT B
riRCULAR NO, A-87
STANDARDS FOR SELECTED ITEMS OF COSTS
(No. A-87)
D-15
-------
ATTACHMENT E
CIRCULAR NO. A-67
STANDARDS FOR SELECTED ITEMS OF COSTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
A. Purpose and applicability
1. Objective . 3
2. Application 3
B. Allowable costs
1. Accounting . 3
2. Adverti sing 3
3. Advisory councils 4
4. Audit service 4
5. Bonding 4
6. Budgeting 4
7. Building lease management 4
8. Central stores 4
9. Communications 4
10. Compensation for personal services 4
11. Depreciation and use allowances 5
12. Disbursing service
13. Employee fringe benefits
14. Employee morale, health and welfare costs
15. Exhibits 7
16. Legal expenses , 7
17. Maintenance and repair 7
IB. Materials and supplies 7
19. Memberships, subscriptions and professional
activities 7
20. Motor pools B
21. Payroll preparation 8
22. Personnel administration 8
23 . Printing and reproduction 8
24. procurement service 6
25. 'Taxes.. . , : 8
26. Training and education 9
27. Transportation 9
28. Travel 9
C. Costs allowable with approval of grantor agency
1. Automatic data processing. . 9
(No. A-87)
D-16
-------
2. Building space and related facilities 9
3. Capital expenditures 1C
4. Insurance and indemnification 11
5. Management studies 12
6. Preagreement costs 12
7. Professional services 12
8. Proposal costs , 12
Unallowable costs
1. Bad debts 12
2. Contingencies 12
3. Contributions and donations 12
4. Entertainment 12
5. Fines and penalties 12
6. Governor' s expenses 12
7.; Interest and other financial costs 13
8. Legislative expenses.... 13
9. Underrecovery of costs under grant agreements 13
(No. *-87)
D-17
-------
STANDARDS FOR SELECTED ITEMS OF COST
A. Purpose and applicability.
!• Objective. This Attachment provides standards
determining the allowability of selected items of cost.
for
2. Application. These standards will apply irrespective of
whether a particular item of cost is treated as direct cr
indirect cost. Failure to mention a particular item of cost ir,
the standards is not intended to imply that it is either
allowable or unallowable, rather determination of allowability an
each case should be based on the treatment of standards provided
for similar or related items of cost. The allowability of the
selected items of cost is subject to the general policies and
principles stated in Attachment A of this Circular.
E. Allowable costs.
1. Accounting. The cost of establishing and maintaining
accounting and other information systems required for the
management of grant programs is allowable. This includes costs
incurred by central service agencies for these purposes. The
cost of maintaining central accounting records required for
overall State or Indian tribal government purposes, suc
appropriation and fund accounts by the Treasurer, Comptroller,
similar officials, is considered to be a general expense
government and is not allowable.
2. Advertising. Advertising media includes newspapers,
magazines, radio and television programs, direct mail, trade
papers, and the like. The advertising costs allowable are those
which are solely for:
a. Recruitment of personnel required for the gran*
program.
.b. Solicitation of bids for the procurement of goods and
services* required.
c. Disposal of scrap or surplus materials acquired ir.
the performance of the grant agreement.
d. Other purposes specifically provided for in the grant
agreement.
(No. A-8?)
D-18
-------
3. Advisory councils. Costs incurred by State advisory
councils or committees established pursuant to Federal
requirements to carry out grant programs are allowable. The cost
of like organizations is allowable when provided for in the grant
agreement.
4. Audit service. The cost of audits necessary for the
administration and management of functions related to grant
programs is allowable.
5. Bonding. Costs of premiums on bonds covering employees
who handle grantee agency funds are allowable.
6. Budgeting. Costs incurred for the development.
preparation, presentation, and execution of budgets are
allowable. Costs for services of a central budget office are
generally Ł$$ allowable since these are costs of general
government. However, where employees of the central budget
office actively participate in the grantee agency's budget
process, the cost of identifiable cervices as allowable.
7. BuiIding lease management. The administrative cost for
lease management which includes review of lease proposals,
maintenance of a list of available property for lease, and
related activities is allowable.
8. Central stores. The cost of maintaining and operating a
central stores organization for supplies, equipment, ar.d
materials used either directly or indirectly for grant programs
is allowable.
9. Communications. Communication costs incurred for
telephone calls or service, teletype service, wide area telephone
service (WATS), centrex, telpak (tie lines), postage, messenger
service and similar expenses are allowable.
10. Compensation for personal services.
a. General. Compensation for personal services includes
all remuneration, paid currently or accrued, for services
rendered during the period of performance under the grar.t
Agreement. including but not necessarily limited to wages,
salaries, and supplementary compensation and benefits (Section
B.13.). The costs of such compensation are allowable to the
extent that total compensation for individual employees: (1) is
reasonable for the services rendered; (2) follows an appointment
made in accordance with State, local, or Indian tribal government
(No. A-B7)
D-19
-------
laws and rules and which meets Federal merit -system or other
requirements, where applicable; and (3) is determined and
supported as provided in b. below. Compensation for employees:
engaged in federally-assisted activities will be considered
reasonable to the extent that it is consistent with that paid for
similar work in other activities of the State, local, or Indian
tribal government. In cases where the kinds of employees
required for the federally-assisted activities are not found in
the other activities of the State, local, or Indian tribal
government, compensation will be considered reasonable to the
extent that it is comparable to that paid for similar work in the
labor market in which the employing government competes for the
kind of employees involved. Compensation surveys providing data
representative of the labor market involved will be an acceptable
basis for evaluating reasonableness.
b. Payroll and distribution of time. Amounts charged tc
grant programs fc: personal services, regardless of whether
treated as direct or indirect costs, will be based on payrolls
documented and provided in accordance with generally accepted
practice of the State, local, or Indian tribal government.
Payrolls must be supported by time and attendance or equivalent
records for individual employees. Salaries and wages of
employees chargeable to more than one grant program or other cost
objective will be supported by appropriate time distribution
records. The method used should produce an equitable
distribution of time and effort.
11. Depreciation and use allowances.
a. Grantees may be compensated for the use of buildings,
capital improvements, and equipment through use allowances or
depreciation. Use allowances are the means of providing
compensation in lieu of depreciation or other equivalent costs.
However, a combination of the two methods may not be used in
connection with a single class of fixed assets.
b. The computation of depreciation or use allowance will
be based on acquisition cost. Where actual cost records have not
been maintained, a reasonable estimate of the original
acquisition cost may be used in the computation. The computation
-will exclude the cost or any portion of the cost of buildings and
equipment donated or borne directly or indirectly by the Federal
Government through charges to Federal grant programs or
otherwise, irrespective of where title was originally vested or
where it presently resides. In addition, the computation will
also exclude the cost of land. Depreciation or a use allowance
•
. (No. A-87)
D-20
-------
on idle or excess facilities is not allowable, except
specifically authorized by the grantor Federal agency.
vhes.
c. Where the depreciation method is followed, adequate
property records must be maintained, and any generally-accepted
•ethod of computing depreciation may be used. However, the
Method of computing depreciation must be consistently applied for
any specific asset or class of assets for all affected
federally-sponsored programs and must result in equitable charges
considering the extent of the use of the assets for the benefit
of such programs.
d. In lieu of depreciation, a use allowance for
buildings and improvements may be computed at an annual rate net
exceeding two percent of acquisition cost. The use allowance for
equipment (excluding items properly capitalized as building cost)
will be computed at an annual rate not exceeding six .and
two-thirds percent of acquisition cost of usable equipment.
e. No depreciation or use charge may be allowed on any
assets that would be considered as fully depreciated, provided.
however, that reasonable use charges may be negotiated for any
such assets if warranted after taking into consideration the cost
of the facility- or iteir, involved, the estimated useful life
remaining at time of negotiation, the effect of any increased!
maintenance charges or decreased efficiency due to age, and any
other factors pertinent to the utilization of the facility c
it err for the purpose contemplated.
12. Disbursing service. The cost of disbursing grant program
funds by the Treasurer or other designated officer is allowable.
Disbursing services cover the processing of checks or warrants.
from preparation to redemption, including the necessary records
of accountability and reconciliation of such records with related
cash accounts.
13. Employee fringe benefits. Costs identified under a. and
b. below are allowable to the extent that total compensation for
employees is reasonable as defined in Section B.10.
*
a. Employee benefits in the form of regular compensation
paid to employees during periods of authorized absences from the
job, such as for annual leave, sick leave, court leave, military
leave, snd the like, if they are: (1) provided pursuant to an
approved leave system; and (2) the cost thereof is equitably
allocated to all related activities, including grant programs.
{No. A-B7)
D-21
-------
b. Employee benefits in the form of
contribution or expenses for social security, employees'
health insurance plans, unemployment insurance coverage',
workmen's compensation insurance, pension plans, severance pay.
and the like, provided such benefits are granted under approves
plans and are distributed equitably to grant programs and to
other activities.
14. Employee morale, health and welfare costs. The costs of
health or first-aid clinics and/or infirmaries, recreational
facilities, employees' counseling services, employee information
publications, and any related expenses incurred in accordance
with general State, local or Indian tribal policy, are allowable.
Income generated from any of these activities will be offset
against expenses.
IS. Exhibits. Costs of exhibits relating specifically to the
grant programs are allowable.
16• Legal expenses. The cost of legal expenses required in
the administration of grant programs is allowable. Legal
services furnished by the chief legal officer of a State, local
or Indian tribal government or his staff solely for the purpose
of discharging his general responsibilities as legal officer are
unallowable. Legal expenses for the prosecution of claims
against the Federal Government are unallowable. • 4j^
17. Maintenance and repair. Costs incurred for necessary
maintenance, repair, or upkeep of property which neither add te
the permanent value of the property nor appreciably prolong its
intended life, but keep it in an efficient operating condition.
are allowable.
IB. Materials and supplies. The cost of materials and
supplies necessary to carry out the grant programs is allowable.
Purchases made specifically for the grant program should be
charged thereto at their actual prices after deducting all cash
discounts, trade discounts, rebates, and allowances received by
the grantee. Withdrawals from general stores or stockrooms
should*be charged at cost under any recognized method of pricing
consistently applied. Incoming transportation charges are a
proper part of material cost.
19. Memberships, subscriptions and professional activities.
a. Memberships. The cost of membership in civic,
business, technical and professional organizations is allowable
•
(No. A-87)
D-22
-------
provided: (1) the benefit from the membership is related to the
grant program; (2) the expenditure is for agency member»hip; (3)
the coat of the membership is reaaonably related to the value of
the services or benefits received; and (4) the expenditure is not
for membership in an organization which devotes a substantial
part of its activities to influencing legislation.
b. Reference material. The cost of books, and
subscriptions to civic, business, professional, and technical
periodicals is allowable when related to the grant program.
c. Meetings and conferences. Costs are allowable when
the primary purpose of the meeting is the dissemination of
technical information relating to the grant program and they are
consistent with regular practices followed for other activities
of the grantee.
20. Motor pools. The costs of a service organization which
provides automobiles to user grantee agencies at a mileage or
fixed rate and/or provides vehicle maintenance, inspection and
repair services are allowable.
21. Payroll preparation. The cost of preparing payrolls and
maintaining necessary related wage records is allowable.
22. Personnel administrati on. Costs for the recruitment,
examination, certification, classification, training,
establishment of pay standards, and related activities for grant
programs, are allowable.
23. Printing and reproduction. Costs for printing and
reproduction services necessary for grant administration.
including but not limited to forms, reports, manuals, and
informational literature, are allowable. Publication costs of
reports or other media relating to grant program accomplishments
or results are allowable when provided for in the grant
agreement.
24. Procurement service. The cost cf procurement service,
including solicitation of bids, preparation and award of
contracts, and all phases of contract -administration in providing
goods, facilities and services for grant programs, is allowable.
25. Taxes. In general, taxes er payments in lieu of taxes
vhich the grantee agency is legally required to pay are
allowable.
«
-------
26. Training and education. The cost of in-service training,
customarily provided for employee development, which directly or
indirectly benefits grant programs is allowable. Out-of
training involving extended periods of time is allowable
when specifically authorized by the grantor agency.
27. Transportation. Costs incurred for freight, cartage,
express, postage and other transportation costs relating either
to goods purchased, delivered, or moved from one location to
another are allowable.
28. Travel. Travel costs are allowable for expenses for
transportation, lodging, subsistence, and related items incurred
by employees who are in travel status on official business
incident to a grant program. Such costs may be charged on an
actual basis, on a per diem or mileage basis in lieu of actual
costs incurred, or on a combination of the two, provided the
method used is applied to an entire trip, and results 'in charges
consistent with those normally allowed in like circumstances in
non-federally sponsored activities. The difference in cost
between first-class air accommodations and less-than-first-class
air accommodations is unallowable except when less-than-first-
class air accommodations are not reasonably available.
notwithstanding the provisions of paragraphs D.6. and 8., travel
costs of officials covered by those paragraphs, when specifically
related to grant programs, are allowable with the prior approval
of a grantor agency.
C. Costs allowable with"approval of grantor agency.
*• Automatic data processing. The cost of data processing
services to grant programs is allowable. This cost may include
rental of equipment or depreciation on grantee-owned equipment.
The acquisition of equipment, whether by outright purchase,
rental-purchase agreement or other method of purchase, is
allowable only upon specific prior approval of the grantor
Federal agency as provided under the selected item for capital
expenditures.
2. Building space and related facilities. The cost of space
in privately or publicly owned buildings used for the benefit of
the grant program is allowable subject to the conditions stated
below. The total cost of space, whether in a privately or
publicly owned building, may not exceed the rental cost of
comparable space and facilities in a privately-owned building in
the same locality. The cost of space procured for grant program
usage may not be charged to the program for periods of
(No. A-B7)
D-24
-------
nonoeeupancy,
agency.
without authorization of the grantor Federal
Rental cost.
The
is
rental cost of ftpace in a
privately-owned building is allowable. Similar costs for
publicly owned buildings newly occupied on or after October 1,
1980, are allowable where "rental rate*1 ay stems, or (equivalent
systems that adequately reflect actual costs, are employed. Such
charges must be determined on the basis of actual cost (including
depreciation based on the useful' life of the building, interest
paid or accrued, operation and maintenance, and other allowable
costs). Where these costs are included in rental charges, they
nay not be charged elsewhere. No costs will be included for
purchases or construction that were originally financed by the
Federal Government.
b. Maintenance and operation. The cost of utilities,
insurance, security, janitorial services, elevator service,
upkeep of grounds, normal repairs and alterations and the like,
are allowable to the extent they iare not otherwise included in
rental or other charges for apace.
c. Rearrangements and alterations. Costs incurred "for
rearrangement and alteration of facilities required specifically
for the grant program or those that materially increase 'the value
or useful life of the facilities (Section C.3.) are allowable
when specifically approved fey the -grantor agency.
d.
buildings.
Depreciation and use allowances on publ icly-ewned
The costs are allowable as provided in Section B.ll.
e. Occupancy of gpace under rental-purchase or a lease
with opt i on-to-purcha se agreement. The cost of space procured
under such arrangements is -allowable vhen specifically approved
by the Federal grantor a'gency.
3. Capital expenditures. The cost -of -facilities, equipment,
ether capital assets, and repairs which materially increase 'the
value or useful life of capital assets is allowable vhen such
procurement is specifically approved by the -Federal grantor
agency. When assets acquired vith Tederal -grant-funds are (a)
aold; (b) no longer available for -use in a federally-sponsored
program; or (c) used '-for purposes not authorized by the grantor
agency, the Federal grantor agency'* equity in the asset will be
refunded in the -same proportion as Federal -participation in its
cost. In case any assets are traded en new items, only the net
cost of the newly-acquired assets is -allowable.
s
(Wo. A-87)
D-25
-------
4. Insurance and indemnification.
a. Costs of insurance required, or approved * ..and.
maintained pursuant to the grant agreement, are allowable. -:,'-: :
..,
b. Costs of. other insurance in connection withv th'e-
general conduct of activities are allowable subject to-'the-
following limitations: _ •
(1) Types and extent and cost of coverage will be. is.
accordance with general State or local government policy ar.=;
sound business practice.
(2) Costs of insurance or of contributions tc . ar.y
reserve covering the risk of loss of, or dasaage to, FedUsrfc
CovernT,»nt property are unallowable except to the extent that tfte"
grantor agency has specifically required or approved such costs?.-.-'-
• *f ' ~
c. Contributions to a reserve for a self-insurance"-
progren approved by the Federal grantor agency arc allovabMr- ;te
the exter-t that the typ« of coverage, extent of coverage, and the
rates and premiums would have been allowed hcc insurance 'beer.
purchased to cover the risks. rr '/
d. Actual losses which could have been covered
permissible insurance (through an approved self-insurance progrS
or otherwise) ar* unallowable unless expressly provided for in
the grant agreement. However, costs incurred because of losses
not covered under nominal deductible insurance coverage provided
in keeping with sound management practice, and miner losses not
covered by insurance, such as spoilage. breakage and
disappearancs of small hand tools which occur in the ordinary
course of operations, are allowable.
e- Inder.ni f i cati on. Includes securing the grante*.
against liabilities to third persons and other losses ~*i?t
compensated by insurance or otherwise. The Government ~ Ł>'
obligated to indemnify the grantee only to the extent expres.siy
provided for in the grant agreement, except -as provided ahT", d;.;
above. <•'
5. Management studies. The cost of management studies fc
improve the effectiveness and efficiency of grant management 'for
ongoing programs is allowable except that the cost of studies
performed by agencies other than the grantee department or
outside consultants is allowable only when authorized by the
Feoeral grantor agency.
(No. A-87)
D-26
-------
6. Preagreement costs. Costs incurred prior to the"
effective date of the grant or contract, whether or not they
would have been allowable thereunder if incurred after such date,..
are allowable when specifically provided for in the grant
agreement. • ^
* •*»-*
7. Professional services. Costs of professional services*
rendered by individuals or organizations not a part of the.
grantee department are allowable subject to such prior
authorization as may be required by the Federal grantor agency. . ;
8. Proposal costs. Costs of preparing proposals <*
potential Federal Government grant agreements are allowable when
specifically provided for in the grant agreement.
D. Unallowable costs. ' - • •
"-' .-".
1. Bad debts. Any losses arising from uncollectible
accounts and other claims, and related costs, are unallowable- --
2. Contingencies. Contributions to a contingency reserve or
any similar provision for unforeseen events are unallowable.
3. Contributions and donations. Unallowable. -.
4- Entertainment. Costs of amusements, social activities,
and incidental costs relating thereto, such as meals, beverages,
lodgings, rentals, transportation, and gratuities, are
unallowable. ~
i
5. Fines and penalties. Costs resulting from violations of;
or failure to comply with Federal, State and local laws and
regulations are unallowable.
6. Governor's expenses. The salaries and expenses of the
Office of the Governor of a State, or the chief executive of a
political subdivision, are considered a cost of general State or
local government and are unallowable. However, for a federally-
recognized Indian tribal government, only that portion of the
salaries and expenses of the office of the chief executive that
is a cost of general government is unallowable. The portion of
salaries and expenses directly attributable to managing and
operating programs by the chief executive and his staff is-
allowable. The allowable portion shall be determined by the
Federal cognizant agency and the Indian government"
representatives on a reasonable basis.
(No. A-87)
D-27
-------
.'.'-'- ' ^ .". ,'*"*, ' * .*
7. .1:Inte'restx and other financial' costs. '. Interest
borrowings(however represented), bond dis'counts; cost
financing and refinancing operations, and legal and professional
fees p>i4.;-ijv-.*.^nnertion'-therewith, are unallowable excepvvher.
authorized'by Cetera! legislation and except as provided for, in
paragraph C. 2. a ^ijof this Attachment. 3..- ;vV' • '•'•
If • -
-•^.-g-t '.y'-Le-tal'slatyye expen-ses. Salaries arid.-ot-her expenses of t_hr-
State legislature;.or *imilajr local govejrnwejital bodies . such »r
county »upervisorsf ^-ci.ty...councils...school boards, etc.-, whether
incurred for-purposes of legislation:6r executive direction, are
unallowable. Va - •;:-.-. ': " "-.:•* ;' -1".. . --^ ••••'••-.{
-.- 9. ' .^nderreeovery of costs under • grant agreements. Any
*" " excess of jpostr. over the Federal; .^cpntribution under .one. gr.ant
agreement is^ unallowable under othe^'gir ant-agreements. .-; ;..: •'*••"
' »^ • ™ ™ _. • -' ••• ».*..,. i . -. •* -_ '•*_.•". „..."..
- _ •».-.,
(NO. A-B7)
-------
-------
APPENDIX E
OMB Circular A-87 "Cost Principles
for State and Local Governments"
E-l
-------
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
WASHINGTON. D.C. 20S03
January 15, 1981
CIRCULAR NO. A-87
Revised
TO THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND ESTABLISHMENTS
SUBJECT: Cost principles for State and local governments
1. Purpose. This Circular establishes principles and standards
for determining costs applicable to grants, contracts', and ether
agreements with State and local governments and
federally-recognized Indian tribal governments.
2. Supersession. This Circular supersedes Federal Management
Circular 74-4 as revised. The Circular is reissued under its
original designation of OMB Circular A-87.
3.- Summary of changes.
Circular.
No substantive changes are made in the
4. Policy intent. This Circular provides principles for
determining the allowable costs of programs administered by
State, local, and federally-recognized Indian tribal governments
under grants from and contracts with the Federal Government.
They are designed to provide the basis for a uniform approach to
the problem of determining costs and to promote efficiency and
better relationships between grantees and the Federal Government.
The principles are for determining costs only and are not
intended to identify the circumstances nor to dictate the extent
of Federal and State or local participation in the financing of a
particular project. They are designed to provide that
federally-assisted programs bear their fair share of costs
recognized under these principles except where restricted or
prohibited by law. No provision for profit or other increment
above cost is intended.
(No. A-87)
E-2
-------
5. Applicability and scope.
a. The provisions of this Circular apply to all Federal
agencies responsible for administering programs that involve
grants and contracts with State, local, and federally-recognized
Indian tribal governments.
b. Its provisions do not apply to grants and contracts with:
(1) Publicly-financed educational institutions subject
to Office of Management and Budget Circular A-21, and
(2) Publicly owned hospitals and other providers of
medical care sxibjecl to requirements promulgated by the
sponsoring Federal agencies.
Any other exceptions will be approved by the Office of Management
and Budget in particular cases where adequate justification is
presented.
6- Attachments. The principles and related policy guides are
set forth in the attachments, which are:
Attachment A - Principles for determining costs applicable to
grants and contracts with State, local, and
federally-recognized Indian tribal govern-
ments .
Attachment B - Standards for selected items of cost.
7. Inquiries. Further information concerning this Circular may
be obtained by contacting the Financial Management Branch, Budget
Review Division, Office of Managemenx and Budget, Washington,
D.C. 20503, telephone 202-395-4773.
fines T. Mclntyrfe,
.rector
Attachments
(No. A-87)
E-3
-------
ATTACHMENT A
CIRCULAR NO. A-87
PRINCIPLES FOR DETERMINING COSTS APPLICABLE
TO GRANTS AND CONTRACTS WITH STATE. LOCAL, AND
FEDERALLY RECOGNIZED INDIAN TRIBAL GOVERNMENTS
(No. A-B7)
E-4
-------
PRINCIPLES FOR DETERMINING COSTS APPLICABLE
TO GRANTS AND CONTRACTS WITH STATE, LOCAL, AND
FEDERALLY RECOGNIZED INDIAN TRIBAL GOVERNMENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
•.Page
A. Purpose and scope
1. Objectives 4
2. Policy guides 4
3. Application 4
B. Definitions
1. Approval or authorization of the grantor Federal
agency 5
2. Cost allocation plan 5
3. Cost 5
4. Cost objective .'.. 5
5. Federal agency 5
6. Federally-recognized Indian tribal governments 5
7. Grant Ł
8. Grant program 5
9. Grantee 6
10. Local unit 6
11. Other State or local agencies 6
12. Services 6
13. Supporting services 6
C. Basic guidelines
1. Factors affecting ailowability of costs c
2. Allocable costs
3. Applicable credits
D. Composition of cost
1. Total cost Ł
2. Classification of costs 6
E. Direct costs
1. General 6
2. Application 8
(No. A-87)
E-5
-------
F. Indirect costs
1. General 9
2. Grantee departmental indirect costs 9
3. Limitation on indirect costs 10
G. Cost incurred by agencies other than the grantee
1. General * 10
2. Alternative methods of determining indirect cost.... 10
H. Cost incurred by grantee department for others
1. General 11
J. Cost allocation plan
1. General 11
2. Requirements 11
3. Instructions for preparation of cost allocation
plans 11
4. Negotiation and approval of indirect cost proposals
for States 12
S. Negotiation and approval of indirect cost proposals
for local governments 12
6. Negotiation and approval of indirect cost f;pposals
for federally-recognized Indian tribal governments.. 12
7. Resolution of problems 12
(No. A-B7)
E-6
-------
-------
PRINCIPLES FOR DETERMINING COSTS APPLICABLE TO
GRANTS AND CONTRACTS WITH STATE, LOCAL, AND
FEDERALLY RECOGNIZED INDIAN TRIBAL GOVERNMENTS
A. Purpose and scope.
*-
f
1. Objectives. This Attachment sets forth principles fcr
determining the allowable costs of programs administered by
State, local, and federally-recognized Indian tribal governments
under grants from and contracts with the "Federal Government. The
principles are for the purpose of cost determination and are net
intended to identify the circumstances or dictate the extent cf
Federal and State or local participation in the financing cf a
particular grant. They are designed to provide that
federally-assisted programs bear their fair share of ccsti
recognized under these principles, -except where restricted c:
prohibited by law. No provision for profit cr other increrr.er..
above cost is intended.
2- Policy guides. The application of. these principles is
based on the fundamental prerases that:
a. State, local, and federally-recognized Indian tribal
governments are responsible for the efficient and effective
administration of grant and contract programs through the
application of sound management practices.
b. The grantee or contractor assumes the responsibility
for seeing that federally-assisted prograr. funds have beer.
expended and accounted for consistent with underlying agreements
and program objectives.
c. Each grantee or contractor organization, ir.
recognition of its own unique combination of staff facilities ar.s
experience, will have the primary responsibility for employing
whatever form of organization and management techniques may be
necessary to assure proper and efficient administration.
3. Application. These principles will be applied by all
Federal agencies in determining costs incurred by State, local.
and federally recognized Indian tribal governments under Federal
grants and cost reimbursement type contracts (including subgrar.is
and subcontracts) except those with (a) publicly-finances
educational institutions subject to Office of Management ar.s
Budget Circular A-21. and
-------
providers of medical care subject to requirements promulgated
the sponsoring Federal agencies.
8. Definitions.
1. Approval or authorization of the grantor Federal agency
means documentation evidencing consent prior to incurring
specific cost.
2. Cost allocation plan means the documentation identifying.
accumulating, and distributing allowable costs under grants and
contracts together with the allocation methods used.
3. Cost, as used herein, means cost as determined on a cash,
accrual, or other basis acceptable to the Federal grantor agency
as a discharge of the grantee's accountability for Federal
4. Cost objective means a pool, center, or area established
for the accumulation of cost. Such areas include organizational
units, functions, objects or items of expense, as well as
ultimate cost objectives including specific grants, projects.
contracts, and other activities.
5- Federal agency means any department, agency, commission,
or instrumentality in the executive branch of the Fede«k<
Government which makes grants to or contracts with State, loca^P,
or federally-recognized Indian tribal governments.
6. Federaily*fecognized Indian tribal governments means the
governing body or a governmental agency of any Indian tribe.
band, nation, or other organized group or community (including
any native village as defined in Section 3 of the Alaska Native
Claims Settlement Act, 65 Stat. 688) certified by the Secretary
of the Interior as eligible for the special programs and services
provided by him through the Bureau of Indian Affairs.
7. Grant means an agreement between the Federal Government
and a State, local, or federally-recognized Indian tribal
government whereby the Federal Government provides funds or aid
in kind to carry out specified programs, services, or ertivixies.
The principles and policies stated in this Circular as applicable
to grants in general also apply to any federally-sponsored cost
reimbursement-type of agreement performed by a State. local. or
federally-recognized Indian tribal government.
6. Grant program means those activ:,..ies and operations of
the grantee which are necessary to carry out the purposes of the
(No. A-87)
E-8
-------
grant, including any portion of the program financed by the
grantee.
9. Grantee Means the department or agency of State, local,
or federally recognised Indian tribal government which IE
responsible for administration of the grant.
•
*°- Loesi unit means any political.subdivision of government
below the State level.
**• Other State or local agencies means departments or
agencies of the State or local unit which provide goods.
facilities, and services to a grantee.
22. Services, as used herein, means goods and facilities, mt
well as services.
23. Supporting services means auxiliary functions necessary
to sustain the direct effort involved an administering a grant
program or an activity providing service to the grant prograr..
these services may be centralized in the grantee department or an
some other agency, and include procurement, payroll, personnel
functions, maintenance and operation of space, data processing,
accountang, budgeting, auditing, mail and messenger service, and
the like.
C. Basic guidelines.
1- Factors affecting allowability of costs. To be allowable
under a grar.t program, costs must meet the following general
criteria:
a. Be necessary and reasonable for proper and efficient
administration of the grant programs, be allocable thereto under
these principles, and, except as specifically provided herein,
not be a general expense required to carry out the overall
responsibilities of State, local, or federally-recognized Indian
tribal governments.
b. Be authorized or not prohibited under State or local
laws or regulations.
c. Conform to any limitations or exclusion* set forth an
these principles, Federal laws, or other governing limitation* as
to types or amounts of cost items.
-------
d. B* consistent vith policies. regulations, and
procedures thtt apply uniformly to both federally assisted
ether activities of the unit of government of which the grant
is a part.
Ł»)
e. Be accorded consistent treatment through application
of generally accepted accounting principles appropriate to the
circumstances.
f. Not be allocable to or included as a cost of any
ether federally financed prograir in either the current or a prior
period. ' .
2.
g. Be net ef all applicable credits.
Allocable costs.
a. A cost is allocable to a particular cost objective tc
the extent ef benefits received by such objective.
b. Any cost allocable to a particular grant er cost
objective under the principles provided for in this Circulsr may
net be shifted to ether Federal grant programs to overcome fund
deficiencies, avoid restrictions imposed by lav or grant
agreements, or for other reasons.
c. Where an allocation of joint cost will ultimate
result in charges to a grant program, an allocation plan will
required as prescribed in Section J. .
3. Applicable credits.
a. Applicable credits refer to those receipts or
reduction of expenditure- type transactions vhich offset er reduce
expense items allocable to grants as direct er indirect costs.
Examples ef such transactions are: purchase discounts; rebates
er allowances, recoveries or indemnities en losses; sale of
publications, equipment, and scrap; income from personal er
incidental services; and adjustments ef overpayments er erroneeu*
charges.
«
b. Applicable credits may also arise when Federsl funds
are received er are available from sources ether than the grant
program involved to finance operations or capital items ef the
grantee. This includes eests arising from the use er
c'Lpreciation of items donated er financed by the Federal
Government to fulfill matching requirements under another grant
(No. A~67)
E-10
-------
program. These types of credits should likewise be used to
reduce related expenditures in determining the ratea or amounts
applicable to a given grant.
t>.. Composition of cost.
1. Total cost. The total cost of a grant program is
comprised of the allowable direct cost incident to its
performance, plus its allocable portion of allowable indirect
costs, less applicable credits.
2. Classification of costs. There is no universal rule for
classifying certain costs as either direct or indirect under
every accounting system. A cost may be direct with respect to
seme specific service or function, but indirect with respect to
the grant or other ultimate cost objective. It is essential.
therefore, that each item of cost be treated consistently either
as a direct or an indirect cost. Specific guides for determining
direct and indirect costs allocable under grant programs are
provided in the sections which follow.
E. Direst costs.
1- General. Direct costs ere those that can be identified
specifically with a particular tost objective. These costs may
be charged directly to grants, contracts, or to other programs
ag&inst which costs are finally lodged. Direct costs may also b«
charged to cost objectives used for the accumulation of costs
pending distribution in due course to grants end -other ultimate
cost objectives.
2. Application. Typical direct costs chargeable to grar.*.
programs are:
a. Compensation of employees for the Time and effort
devoted specifically to the execution of grant programs.
b. Cost of materials Acquired, consumed, or expended
specifically for the purpose of the grant.
c. Equipment and other approved capital expenditures.
d. Other items of expense Incurred specifically to carry
out the grant agreement.
(No. A-B7)
'F'-ll
-------
e. Services furnished specifically for the grant prograr,
by ether agencies, provided such charges are consistent with
criteria outlined in Section C of these principles.
F. Indirect costs.
1. General. Indirect costs are those (a) incurred for a
common or joint purpose benefiting more than one cost objective,
and (b) not readily assignable to the cost objectives
specifically benefited, without effort disproportionate to the
results achieved. The term "indirect costs," as used herein,
applies to costs of this type originating in the grantee
department, as well as those incurred by other departments in
supplying goods, services, and facilities, to the grantee
department. To facilitate equitable distribution of indirect
expenses to the cost objectives served, it may be necessary to
establish a number of pools of indirect cost within a grantee
department or in other agencies providing services to a grantee
department. Indirect cost pools should be distributed tc
benefiting cost objectives on bases which will produce an
equitable result in consideration of relative benefits derived.
2- Crantee departmental indirect costs. All grantee
departmental indirect costs, including the various levels of
supervision, are eligible for allocation to grant programs
provided they meet the conditions set forth in this Circular. I
lieu of determining the actual amount of grantee departmental
indirect cost allocable to a grant program, the following methods
may be used:
a- Predetermined fixed rates for indirect costs. A
predetermined fixed rate for computing indirect costs applicable
to a grant may be negotiated annually in situations where the
cost experience and other pertinent facts available*are deemed
sufficient to enable the contracting parties tc reach an inferred
judgment (1) as to the probable level of indirect costs in the
grantee department during the period to be covered by the
negotiated rate, and (2) that the amount allowable under the
.predetermined rate would not exceed actual indirect cost.
b. Negotiated lump SUIT for overhead. A negotiated fixed
amount in lieu of indirect costs may be appropriate under
circumstances where the benefits derived from a grantee
department's indirect services cannot be readily determined as in
the case of small, self-contained or isolated activity. When
this method is used, a determination should be made that the
amount negotiated will be approximately the same as the actual
(No. A-67)
E-12
-------
indirect cost that nay be incurred. Such amounts negotiated in
lieu of indirect costs will be treated as an offset to total
indirect expenses of the grantee department before allocation to
remaining activities. The base on which such remaining expenses
are allocated should be appropriately adjusted. ; ;
3• Limitation on indirect costs.
a. Federal grants may be subject to laws that limit the
amount of indirect costs that may be allowed. Agencies that
sponsor grants of this type will establish procedures which will
assure that the amount actually allowed for indirect costs under
each such grant does not exceed the maximum allowable under the
statutory limitation or the amount otherwise allowable under this
Circular, whichever is the smaller.
b. When the amount allowable under a statutory
limitation is less than the amount otherwise allocabie as
indirect costs under this Circular, the amount not recoverable as
indirect costs under a grant may not be shifted to another
federally-sponsored grant program or contract.
G. Cost incurred by agencies other than the grantee.
1. General. The cost of service provided by other agencies
may only include allowable direct costs of the service plus a pro
rata share of allowable supporting costs (Section Ł.12.) and
supervision directly required in performing the service, but not
supervision of a general nature such as that provided by the head
of a department and his staff assistants not directly involved in
operations. However, supervision by the head of a department or
agency whose sole function is providing the service furnishes
would be an eligible cost. Supporting costs include those
furnished by other units of the supplying department or by other
agencies.
2. Alternative methods of determining indirect cost. In
lieu of determining actual indirect cost related to a particular
service furnished by another agency, either of the following
alternative methods nay be used provided only one method is used
for a specific service during the fiscal year involved.
a. Standard indirect rate. An amount equal to ten
percent of direct labor cost in providing the service performed
by another State agency (excluding overtime, shift, or holiday
premiums and fringe benefits) may be allowed in lieu of actual
allowable indirect cost for that service.
•
(No. A-87)
E-13
-------
&• Preaetermined fixed rate. A predetermined fixed ra
for indirect cost of the unit or activity providing service m
be negotiated as set forth in Section F.2.a.
H Cost incurred by, grantee department for others.
1. General.
_ The principles provided in Section C will also
determining the cost of services provided by the
Th
used in
grantee department to another agency.
J. Cost allocation
1. General. A plan for allocation of costs will be required
to support the distribution of any joint costs related to the
grant program. All costs included in the plan will be supported
by formal accounting records which will substantiate the
propriety of eventual charges.
2. Requirements. The allocation plan of the grantee
department should cover all joint costs of the department as well
as costs to be allocated under plans of other agencies or
organizational units which are to be included in the costs of
federally-sponsored programs. The cost allocation plans of all
the agencies rendering services to the grantee department, to the
extent feasible, should be presented in a single document
allocation plan should contain, but not necessarily be
to. the following:
a. The nature and extent of services provided and their
relevance to the federally-sponsored programs.
b. The items of expense to be included.
c. The methods to be used in distributing cost.
3 . Instructions for preparation of csst allocation plans .
The Department of Health and Human Services in consultation with
the ether Federal agencies concerned, will be responsible for
developing and issuing the instructions for use by grantees in
preparation of cost allocation plans. This responsibility
applies to both central support services at the State, local, and
irciian .tribal level and indirect cost proposals of individual
grantee departments.
(No. A-B7)
E-14
-------
Negotiation and approval of indirect cost
proposals for
a. The Department of Health and Hunan Services, in
collaboration vith the other Federal agencies concerned, vill be
responsible for negotiation, approval, and audit of cost
allocation plans, which vill be submitted to it by the States.
These plans vill cover central support service costs of the
State:
b. At the grantee department level in a State, a single
cognizant Federal agency vill have responsibility similar to that
set forth in a, above, for the negotiation, approval, and audit
of the indirect cost proposal. A current list of agency
assignments is maintained by the Office of Management and Budget.
c. Questions concerning the cost allocation plans
approved under a. and b. above, should be directed to the agency
responsible for such approvals.
5. Negotiation and approval of indirect cost
local governments.
proposals fer
a. Cost allocation plans vill be retained at the local
government level for audit by a designated Federal agency except
in those cases where that agency requests that cost allocation
plans be submitted to it for negotiation and approval.
b. A list of cognizant Federal agencies assigned
responsibility for negotiation, approval and audit of central
support service cost allocation plans at the local government
level is maintained by the Office of Management and Budget.
c. At the grantee department level of local governments,
the Federal agency vith the predominant interest in the work of
the grantee department will be responsible for necessary
negotiation, approval and audit of the indirect cost proposal.
6. negotiation and approval of indirect cost proposals for
federally recognized Indian tribal governments. The Federal
agency with the predominant interest in the work of the grantee
department will be responsible for necessary negotiation,
approval and audit of the indirect cost proposal.
7. Resolution of problems. To the extent that problems are
encountered among the Federal agencies in connection with 4 and 5
(No. A-87)
E-15
-------
above, the Office of Management and Budget will land assistance
aa required. 4fc\
(No. A-67)
E-16
-------
APPENDIX F
OMB Circular A-21 "Cost Principles
for Educational Institutions"
-------
-------
*=>*' >'
^v"
'•"'-','••'
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
WASHINGTON. D.C. 20503
July 28, 1982
MEMORANDUM
FROM:
SUBJECT:
JOHN J. LORDAN
Circular A-21, Vost principles for
educational institutions"
Enclosed is an advance copy of revisions that have been made to
Circular A-21, "Cost principles for educational institutions."
The revisions were approved by the Director on July 23, 1982, and
are expected to be published in the Federal Register in about a
week.
As you know, the revisions pertaining to personal service costs
are based on recommendations of a university group composed of
representatives from the Association of American Universities and
uncil of Scientific Society Presidents. It gives universities
re flexibility in selecting the method to be used in accounting
for salary costs, but still provides strict accountability for
Federal funds. The revised Circular also makes allowable interest
costs related to newly constructed or acquired buildings, major
building renovations, and major equipment purchases.
Enclosure
F-2
-------
-------
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
WASHINGTON. D.C
July 23, 1982
CIRCULAR NO. A-21
. Revised
•Transmittal Memorandum No. 1
TO THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND ESTABLISHMENTS
SUBJECT: Cost principles for universities
This Transmittal Memorandum revises OMB Circular No. A-21,
"Cost principles for educational institutions."
The revision changes the procedures covering allocation of
personal service costs and recognizes interest costs in
certain circumstances.
David A. Stockman
Director
Attachment
F-3
-------
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
WASHINGTON. D.C. 20503
Circular A-21 - Cost Principles for Educational Institutions
Circular A-21 is revised as follows:
Paragraph B.1.
The following replaces section B.1:
B. Definition of Terms
1. Major functions of an institution refers to instruction,
organized research, other sponsored activities, and other institu-
tional activities as defined below:
a. Instruction means the teaching and training activities
•
of an institution. Except for research training as provided in c.
below, this term includes all teaching and training activities,
whether they are offered for credits toward a degree or certifi-
cate or on a non-credit basis, and whether they are offered
through regular academic departments or separate divisions, such
as a summer school division or an extension division. Also con-
sidered part of .this major function are departmental research,
and, where agreed to, university research.
F-4
-------
(!) Sponsored .instruction and training means specific
instructional or training activity established by grant, contract,
or cooperative agreement. For purposes of the cost principles,
this activity nay be considered a major function even though an
institution's accounting treatment may include it in the instruc-
tion function.
(2) Departmental research means research development
and scholarly activities that are not organized research and, con-
sequently, are not separately budgeted and accounted for. Depart-
mental research, for purposes of this document, is not considered!
as a major function, but as a part of the instruction function of
the institution.
b. Organized research means all research and development
activities o*f an institution that are separately budgeted and ,„,..
accounted for. It includes:
(1) Sponsored research means all research and develop-
ment activities that are sponsored by Federal and non-Federal
•
agencies and organizations. This term includes activities invol-
ving the training of individuals in research techniques (commonly
called research training) where such activities utilize the same
facilities as other research and development activities and where
«
such activities are not included -in'-^the instruction function.
F-5
-------
(2) University research means all research and devel-
opment activities that are separately budgeted by the institution
under an internal application of institutional funds. University
research, for purposes of this document, may be considered a part
of the instruction function, or may be combined with sponsored
research under the function of organized research, or may be
treated as a separate major function, as agreed to with the cogni<
zant agency.
c. d. becomes c.
d. e. becomes d.
Paragraph J. 6.
The following replaces sections J. 6. b. through d.
J. Compensation for Personal Service^
6. b. O) General Principles
(a) The distribution of salaries and wages,
whether treated as direct or indirect costs, will be based on pay-
rolls documented in accordance with the generally accepted prac-
•
tices of colleges and universities. Institutions may include in a
residual category ail activities that are not directly charged to
F-6
-------
sponsored agreements, and that need not be distributed to wore
than one activity for purposes of identifying indirect costs and
the functions to which they are allocable. The components of the
residual category are not required to be separately documented.
(b) The apportionment of employees' salaries and
wages which are chargeable to more than one sponsored agreement or
other cost objective will be accomplished by methods which will
(1} be in accordance with Sections A-2 and C above, (2) produce an
equitable distribution of charges for employees' activities, and
(3) distinguish the employees' direct activities from their
indirect activities.
(c) In the use of any methods for apportioning
salaries, -it is recognized that, in an academic setting, teaching,
research, service, and administration are often inextricably
intermingled. A precise assessment of factors that contribute to
costs is not always feasible, nor is it expected. Reliance,
•
therefore, is placed on estimates in which a degree of tolerance
is appropriate.
•
(d) There is no single best method for documenting
the distribution of charges for personal services.
Methods for apportioning salaries and wages, however, must meet
the criteria specified in J.€.b. (2) below. Examples of acceptable
F-7
-------
methods are contained in J.6.c. below. Other methods which meet
the criteria specfied in J.6.b.(2) below also shall be deemed
acceptable, if a mutually satisfactory alternative agreement is
reached.
(2) Criteria for Acceptable Methods
(a) The payroll distribution system will (i) be
incorporated into the official records of the institution, (ii)
reasonably reflect the activity for which the employee is compen-
sated by the institution, and (iii) encompass both sponsored and
all other activities on an integrated basis, but may include the
use of subsidiary records. (Compensation for incidental work
described in J.6.a. need not be included.)
(b) The method must recognize the principle of
after-the-fact confirmation or determination so that costs dis-
tributed represent actual costs, unless a mutually satisfactory
*
alternative agreement is reached.
Direct cost activities and indirect cost activities may be con-
firmed by responsible persons with suitable means of verification
that the work was performed. Confirmation by the employee is not
a requirement for either direct or indirect cost activities
other responsible persons make appropriate confirmations.
F-8
-------
(c) The payroll distribution system will allow
'confirmation of activity allocable to each sponsored agreement and
each of the categories of activity needed to identify indirect
costs and the functions to which they are allocable. The activi-
ties chargeable to indirect cost categories or the major functions
of the institution for employees whose salaries must be appor-
tioned (see J.€.b.1.(b) above), if not initially identified as
separate categories, may be subsequently distributed by any
reasonable method mutually agreed to, including, but not limited
to, suitably conducted surveys, statistical sampling procedures,
or the application of negotiated fixed rates.
(d) Practices vary among institutions and within
institutions as to the activity constituting a full workload.
Therefore, the payroll distribution system may reflect categories
of activities expressed as a percentage distribution of total
activities.
(e) Direct and indirect charges may be made initi-
ally to sponsored agreements on the basis of estimates made before
•
services are performed. When such estimates are used, significant
changes in the corresponding work activity must be identified and
entered 'into the payroll distribution system. Short-term (such as
one or two months) fluctuation between workload categories need
*
not be considered as long as *the distribution of salaries and
F-9
-------
wages is reasonable over the longer term, such as an academic
period.
(Ł) The system will provide for independent inter*
nal evaluations to ensure the system's effectiveness and compli-
ance with the above standards.
(g) For systems which meet these standards, the
institution will not be required to provide additional support or
documentation for the effort actually performed.
J. 6. c. Examples of Acceptable Methods for Payroll
Distribution:
1. Plan - Confirmationi Under this method, the distri-
bution of salaries, and wages of professorial or professional staff
applicable to sponsored agreements is based on budgeted, planned,
or assigned work activity, updated to reflect any significant
changes in work distribution. A plan-confirmation system used for
salaries and wages charged directly or indirectly to sponsored
•
agreements will meet the following standards:
(a) A system of budgeted, planned, or assigned
work activity will be incorporated into the official records of
•
the institution and encompass both sponsored and all other activi-
p-in
-------
ties on an integrated basis. The system may include the use of
subsidiary records.
(b) The system will reasonably reflect only the
activity for which the employee is compensated by the institution
(compensation for incidental work described in J.6.a. need not be
included). Practices vary among institutions and within institu-
tions as to the activity constituting a full workload. Hence/ the
system will reflect categories of activities expressed as a per-
centage distribution of total activities. (But see Section H for
treatment of indirect costs under the simplified method for small
institutions.)
(c) The system will reflect activity applicable to
each sponsored agreement and to each category needed to identify
indirect costs and the functions to which they are allocable. The"
system may treat indirect cost activities initially within a
residual category and subsequently determine them by alternate
•
methods as discussed in J.6.b.(2)(c).
(d) The system will provide for modification of an
individual's salary or salary distribution commensurate with any
significant change in the employee's work activity. Short-term
(such as one or two months) fluctuation between workload cate-
•
gories need not be considered as long as the distribution of
salaries and wages is reasonable over the longer tern such as an
F-ll
-------
academic period. Whenever it is apparent that a significant
change in work activity which is directly or indirectly charged to
sponsored agreements will occur or has occurred, the change will
be documented over the signature of a responsible official and
entered into the system.
(e) At least annually a statement will be signed
by the employee, principal investigator, or responsible
official(s) using suitable means of verification that the work was
performed, stating that salaries and wages charged to sponsored
agreements as direct charges, and to residual, indirect cost or
other categories are reasonable in relation to work performed.
(f} The system will provide for independent
internal evaluation to ensure the system's integrity and compli-
ance with the above standards.
(g) In the- use of this method, an institution
shall not be required to provide additional support or documenta-
tion for the effort actually performed.
2. After-the-fact Activity Records; Under this
system the distribution of salaries and wages by the institution
will be supported by activity reports as prescribed below.
F-12
-------
(a) Activity reports will reflect the distribution
of activity expended by employees covered by the system (compensa-
tion for incidential work as described in J.6.a. need not be
included). '
(b) These reports will reflect an after-the-fact
reporting of the percentage distribution of activity of employees.
Charges may be made initially on the basis of estimates made
before the services are performed, provided that such charges are
promptly adjusted if significant differences are indicated by
activity records.
(c) Reports will reasonably reflect the activities
for which employees are compensated by the institution. To con-
firm that the distribution of activity represents a reasonable *
estimate of the work performed by the employee during the period,
the reports will be signed by the employee, principal investi-
gator, or responsible official(s) using suitable means of verifi-
*
cation that the work was performed.
(d) The system will reflect activity applicable to
each sponsored agreement and to each category needed to identify
indirect costs and the functions to which they are allocable. The
system may treat indirect cost activities initially within a
•
residual category and subsequently determine them by alternate
methods as discussed in J.6.b.(2}(c).
F-13
-------
(e) For professorial and professional staff, the
reports will be prepared each academic term, but no less fre-
quently than every six months. For other employees, unless alter-
nate arrangements are agreed to, the reports will be prepared no
less frequently than monthly and will coincide with one or more
pay periods.
(f) Where the institution uses time cards or other
forms of after-the-fact payroll documents as original documenta-
tion for payroll and payroll charges, such documents shall qualify
as records for this purpose provided that -they meet the require-
ments in (a) through (e) above.
3. Multiple Confirmation' Records; Under this system
the distribution of salaries and wages of professorial and. profes-
sional staff will be supported by records which certify separately
for direct and indirect cost activities as prescribed belcw.
(a) For employees covered by the system, there
will be direct cost records to reflect the distribution of that
•
activity expended which is to be allocable as direct cost to each
sponsored agreement. There will also be indirect cost records to
reflect the distribution of that activity to indirect costs.
These records may be kept jointly or separately (but are to be
•
certified separately, see below).
F-14
-------
(b) Salary and wage charges may be made initially
on the basis of estimates made before the services are performed
provided that such charges are promptly adjusted if significant
differences occur.
(c) Institutional records will reasonably reflect
only the activity for which employees are compensated by the
institution (compensation for incidental work as described in
•
J.6.a. need not be included).
(d) The system will reflect activity applicable to
each sponsored agreement and to each category needed to identify
indirect costs and the functions to which they are allocable.
(e) To confirm that the distribution of activity
represents a reasonable estimate of the work performed by the
employee during the period, the record for each employee will
include:
(1) The signature of the employee or of a
person having direct knowledge of the work, confirming that the
record of activities allocable as direct costs of each sponsored
agreement is appropriate.
(2) The record of indirect costs will include
the signature of responsible person(s) who use suitable means of
F-15
-------
verification that the work was performed and "is consistent with
the overall distribution of the employee's compensated
activities.
These signatures may all be on the same document.
(f) The reports will be prepared each academic
term, but no less frequently than every six months.
(g) Where the institution uses time cards or other
forms of after-the-fact payroll documents as original documenta-
tion for payroll and payroll charges, such documents shall qualify
as records for this purpose provided they meet the requirements in
(a) through (f) above.
RELATED CHANGES:
Change F.4.a.(2)(a) (in Departmental Administration Expenses),
sentence 2, to read:
Salaries of professorial and professional staff whose respon-
sibilities to the institution require administrative work that
benefits sponsored projects may also be included to the extent
that the portion charged to departmental administration is deter-
mined in accordance with Section J.6.
F-16
-------
F.
H.
J.
Indirect costs
1 . General
2. Grantee departmental indirect costs
3. Limitation on indirect costs
G. Cost incurred by agencies other than the grantee
1 . General
2. Alternative methods of determining indirect cost...
Cost incurred by grantee department for others
1. General ......... ....
Cost allocation plan
1 . General
2 . Requirements ....................
3. Instructions for preparation of cost allocation
plans
4. Negotiation and approval of indirect cost proposals
for States
5. Negotiation and approval of indirect cost proposals
for local governments
6. Negotiation and approval of indirect cost Disposals
for federally-recognized Indian tribal governments.
7 . Resolution of problems
9
9
10
ID
10
11
11
11
11
12
12
12
12
(No. A-67)
E-6
-------
-------
PRINCIPLES FOR DETERMINING COSTS APPLICABLE TO
GRANTS AND CONTRACTS WITH STATE, LOCAL, AND
FEDERALLY RECOGNIZED INDIAN TRIBAL GOVERNMENTS
A. Purpose and scope.
«•*-
1. Objectives. This Attachment sets forth principles f
determining the allowable costs of programs administered
State, local, and federally-recognized Indian tribal governmen
under grants from and contracts with the Federal Government.
principles are for the purpose of cost determination and are r.
intended to identify the circumstances or dictate the extent
Federal and State or local participation in the financing cf
particular grant. They are designed to provide th
federally-assisted programs bear their fair share of ccs
recognized under these principles, -except where restricted
prohibited by law. No provision for profit or other ar.crer.e
above cost is intended.
«* s
'nc.
* * w
^ <•>
Of
a
at
Ł
*•. •-
2- Policy guide;s. The application of
based on the fundamental premises that:
these principles
a. State, local, and federally-recognized Indian triral
governments are responsible l"or the efficient and effective
administration of grant and contract programs through the
application of sound management practices.
b. The grantee or contractor assumes the responsibility
for seeing that federally-assisted program funds have beer.
expended and accounted for consistent with underlying agreements
and program objectives.
c. Each grantee or contractor organization, in
recogr.ition of its own unique combination of staff facilities and
experience, will have the primary responsibility for employing
whatever form of organization and management techniques may be
necessary to assure proper and efficient administration.
3. Application. These principles will be applied by all
Federal agencies in determining costs incurred by State, local.
and federally recognized Indian tribal governments under Federal
grants and cost reimbursement type contracts (including subgrants
and subcontracts) except 'those with (a) publicly-fi.nar.rei
educational institutions subject to Office of Management and
Budget Circular A-21, and (b) publicly-owned hospitals and other
(No. A-87)
E-7
-------
providers of medical care subject to requirements promulgated
the sponsoring Federal agencies.
B. Definitions.
1. Approval or authorization of the grantor Federal agency
means documentation evidencing consent prior to incurring
specific cost.
2. Cost allocation plan means the documentation identifying,
accumulating, and distributing allowable costs under grants and
contracts together with the allocation methods used.
3. Cost, as used herein, means cost as determined on a cash.
accrual, or other basis acceptable to the Federal grantor agency
as a discharge of the grantee's accountability for Federal ^funds^
4. Cost objective means a pool, center, or area established
for the accumulation of cost. Such areas include organizational
units, functions, objects or items of expense, as well as
ultimate cost objectives including specific grants, projects,
contracts, and other activities.
5- Federal agency means any department, agency, commission,
or instrumentality in the executive branch of the Fedej
Government which makes grants to or contracts with State, lo<
or federally-recognized Indian tribal governments.
6. Federallv^feeognized Indian tribal governments means the
governing body or a governmental agency of any Indian tribe.
band, nation, or other organized group or community (including
any native village as defined in Section 3 of the Alaska Native
Claims Settlement Act, 85 Stat. 688) certified by the Secrerary
of the Interior as eligible for the special programs and services
provided by him through the Bureau of Indian Affairs.
7. Grant means an agreement between the Federal Government
and a State, local, or federally-recognized Indian tribal
government whereby the Federal Government provides funds or aid
in kind to carry out specified programs, services, or activities.
The principles and policies stated in this Circular as applicable
to grants in general also apply to any federally-sponsored cost
reimbursement-type of agreement performed by a State. local, or
federally-recognized Indian tribal government.
6. Grant program means those activ: ».ies and operations of
the grantee which are necessary to carry our the purposes of the
(No. A-87)
E-8
-------
grant, including any portion of the program financed by the
grantee.
f. Grantee means the department or agency of State, local.
or federally recognized Indian tribal government which is
responsible for administration of the grant.
*°- tocal unit means any political .subdivision of government
below the State level.
11. Other State or local agencies means department* or
agencies of the State or local ur.at which provide goods,
facilities, and services to a grantee.
12. Services, as used herein, means goods and facilities, as
veil as services.
13. Supporting services means auxiliary functions necessary
to sustain the direct «ffort involved in administering a grar.t
prograr. or an activity providing service to the grant "pregrar..
These services may be centralized in the grantee department or in
aome other agency, and include procurement, payroll, personnel
functions, maintenance and operation of space, data processing.
accounting, budgeting, auditing, mail and messenger service, and
the like.
c- Basic guidelines.
1. Factors affecting allowability of costs. To be allowable
under, a grar.t program, costs must meet the following general
criteria:
a. Be necessary and reasonable for proper and efficient
administration of the grant programs, be allocable thereto under
these principles, and. «xeept as specifically provided herein,
net be a general expense required to carry out the overall
responsibilities of State, local, or federally-recognized Indian
tribal governments.
b. Be authorized or not prohibited under State or local
laws or regulations.
c. Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in
these principles. Federal laws, or ether governing limitations as
to types or amounts of cost items.
. A-87)
-------
d. Be consistent with policies, regulations, and
procedures that apply uniformly to both federally assisted a
other activities of the unit of government of which the grant
ia a part.
o. Be accorded conaistent treatment through application
of generally accepted accounting principles appropriate to the
circumstance*.
f. Not be allocable to or included as a cost of any
other federally financed program in either the current or a prior
period.
g. Be net of all applicable credits.
2. Alloeable costs.
a. A cost is allocable to a particular cost objective to
the extent of benefits received by such objective.
b. Any cost allocable to a particular grant or cost
objective under the principles provided for in this Circular may
not be shifted,to other Federal grant programs to overcome fund
deficiencies. avoid restrictions imposed by lav or grar.t
agreements, or for other reasons.
c. Where ar. allocation of joint cost will ultimateldfc
result in charges to a grant program, an allocation plan will beV
required as prescribed in Section J. •
3. Applicable credits.
a. Applicable credits refer to those receipts or
reduction of expenditure-type transactions vhich offset or reduce
expense items allocable to grants as direct or indirect costs.
Examples of auch transactions are: purchase discounts; rebates
or allowances, recoveries or indemnities en losses; sale of
publications, equipment, and scrap; income from personal or
incidental services.- and adjustments of overpayments or erroneous
charges.
b. Applicable credits may also arise when Federal funds
are received or are available from sources other than the grant
program involved to finance operations or capital items of the
grantee. This includes costs arising from the use or
t'ipreciation of items donsted or financed by the Federal
Government to fulfill matching requirements under another grant
(No. A-67)
E-10
-------
program. These types of credits should likewise be used to
reduce related sxpenditures in determining the rates or awounts
applicable to s given grant.
Ł. Competition of cost.
1. Total cost. The total cost of • grant prograr is
comprised of the Allowable direct cost incident to its
performance, plus its allocable portion of allowable indirect
costs, less applicable credits.
2. Clsssification of costs. There is no universal rule for
classifying certain costs as either direct or indirect under
•very accounting system. A cost fcay be direct with respect to
some specific service or function, but indirect with respect to
the grant or other ultimate cost objective. It is essential,
therefore, that each item of cost be treated consistently either
as a direct or an indirect cost. Specific guides for determining
direct and indirect costs allocsble under grant programs are
provided in the sectioni which follow.
E. Direct costs.
1. general . Direct costs are those that can be identified
specifically with a particular tost objective. These costs »sy
be charged directly to grants, contracts, or to ether programs
against which costs are finally lodged. Direct costs may also be
charged to cost objectives used for the accumulation of costs
per.si.ng distribution in due course to grants *nd -other ultimat*
cost objectives.
2. Application.
programs are:
Typical direct "costs chargeable to grar.-.
a. Compensation of employees for the Time and
devoted specifically to the execution of -grant programs.
effort
b. Cost of materials Acquired, consumed, or expended
specifically for the purpose of the grant.
c. Equipment and other approved -capital expenditures .
d. Other items of expense incurred specifically to carry
out the grant agreement.
(No. A-67)
F-ll
-------
e. Services furnished specifically for the grant prograr^
by other agencies, provided such charges are consistent w;t3
criteria outlined in Section C of these principles.
F. Indirect costs.
1- General. Indirect costs are those (a) incurred for a
common or joint purpose benefiting more than one cost objective,
and (b) not readily assignable to the cost objectives
specifically benefited, without effort disproportionate to the
results achieved. The term "indirect costs," as used herein,
applies to costs of .this type originating in the grantee
department, as well as those incurred by other departments in
supplying goods. services, and facilities, to the grantee
department. To facilitate equitable distribution of indirect
expenses to the cost objectives served, it may be necessary to
establish a number of pools of indirect cost within a grantee
department or in other agencies providing services to a grantee
department. Indirect cost pools should be distributed tc
benefiting cost objectives on bases which wall produce an
equitable result in consideration of relative benefits derived.
2- Grantee departmental indirect costs. All grantee
departmental indirect costs, including the various levels of
.supervision, are eligible for allocation to grant programs.
provided they meet the conditions set forth in this Circular.
lieu of determining the actual amount of grantee departmental
indirect cost allocable to a grar.t program, the following methods
may be used:
a. Predetermined fixed rates for indirect costs. A
predetermined fixed rate for computing indirect costs applicable
to a grant may be negotiated annually in situations where the
cost experience and other pertinent facts available*are deer.ed
sufficient to enable the contracting parties tc reach an informed
judgment (1) as to the probable level of indirect costs in the
grantee department during the period to be covered by the
negotiated rate, and (2) that the amount allowable under the
predetermined rate would not exceed actual indirect cost.
A negotiated fixed
appropriate under
from a grantee
b. Negotiated lump sum for overhead.
amount in lieu of indirect costs may be
circumstances where the benefits derived
department's indirect services cannot be readily determined as in
the case of small, self-contained or isolated activity. When
this method is used, a determination should be made that the
amount negotiated will be approximately the same as the actual
(No. A-6*7)
E-12
-------
indirect cost that nay be incurred. Such amounts negotiated in
lieu of indirect costs will be treated as an offset to total
indirect expenses of the grantee department before allocation to
remaining activities. The base on which such remaining expenses
•re allocated should be appropriately adjusted. r \
3. Limitation on indirect costs.
a. Federal grants may be subject to laws that limit the
•mount of indirect costs that may be allowed. Agencies that
sponsor grants of this type will establish procedures which will
assure that the amount actually allowed for indirect costs under
each such grant does not exceed the maximum allowable under the
statutory limitation or the amount otherwise allowable under this
Circular, whichever is the smaller.
b. When the Amount Allowable under a statutory
limitation is less than the amount otherwise allocable as
indirect costs under this Circular, the amount not recoverable as
indirect costs under a grant may not be shifted to another
federally-sponsored grant program or contract.
G. Cost incurred by agencies other than the grantee.
*• General. The cost of service provided by other agencies
may only include allowable direct costs of the service plus a pro
rata share of allowable supporting costs (Section Ł.12.) and
supervision directly required in performing the service, but noi
supervision of a general nature such as that provided by the head
of a department and his staff assistants not directly involved in
operations. However, supervision by the head of a department or
agency whose sole function is providing the service furnishes
would be an eligible cost. Supporting costs include those
furnished by other units of the supplying department or by other
agencies.
2. Alternative methods of determining indirect cost. In
lieu of determining actual indirect cost related to a particular
service furnished by another agency, either of the following
alternative methods may be used provided only one method is used
for a specific service during the fiscal year involved.
a. Standard indirect rate. An amount equal to ter-
pereent of direct labor cost in providing the service performed
by another State agency (excluding overtime, shift, or holiday
premiums and fringe benefits) may be allowed in lieu of actual
allowable indirect cost for that service.
•
(No. A-87)
E-13
-------
fc. Preaetermined fixed rrte. A predetermined fixed ra
lor indirect cost of the unit or Activity providing service m
be negotiated as set forth in Section F.2.a.
H Cost incurred by grantee department for others.
*,
1. General. The principles provided in Section C will also
used in determining the cost of services provided by the
grantee department to another agency.
J. Cost allocation
1. General. A plan for allocation of costs will be required
to support the distribution of any joint costs related to the
grant program. All costs included in the plan will be supported
by formal accounting records which will substantiate the
propriety of eventual charges. -ta
2. Requirements. The allocation plan of the grantee
department should cover all joint costs of the department as well
as costs to be allocated under plans of other agencies or
organizational units which are to be included in the costs of
federally-sponsored programs. The cost allocation plans of all
the agencies rendering services to the grantee department, to the
extent feasible, should be presented in a single document. The
allocation plan should contain, but not necessarily be
to, the following:
a. The nature and extent of services provided and their
relevance to the federally-sponsored programs.
b. The items of expense to be included.
c. The methods to be used in distributing cost.
3 • Instructions for preparation o_f csst allocation plans.
The Department of Health and Human Services in consultation with
the other federal agencies concerned, will be responsible for
developing and issuing the instructions for use by grantees in
preparation of cost allocation plans. This responsibility
Applies to both central support services at the State, local, and
JrMian .tribal level and indirect cost proposals of individual
grantee departments.
(No. A-B7)
E-14
-------
4. Negotiation and approval of indirect cost proposals for
States.
a. The Department of Health and Human Services, in
collaboration with the other Federal agencies concerned, will be
responsible for negotiation, approval, and audit of cost
allocation plans, which will be submitted to it by the States.
These plans vill cover central support service costs of the
State:
b. At the grantee department level in a State, a single
cognizant Federal agency vill have responsibility similar to that.
set forth in a, above, for the negotiation, approval, and audit
of the indirect cost proposal. A current list of agency
assignments is maintained by the Office of Management and Budget.
c. Questions concerning the cost allocation plans
approved under a. and b. above, should be directed to the agency
responsible for such approvals.
5. Negotiation and approval of indirect cost proposals for
1oc a1 governments.
a. Cost allocation plans vill be retained at the local
government level for audit by a designated Federal agency except
in those cases where that agency requests that cost allocation.
kplans be submitted to it for negotiation and approval.
b. A last of cognizant Federal agencies assigned
responsibility for negotiation, approval and audit of central
support service cost allocation plans at the local government
level is maintained by the Office of Management and Budget.
c. At the grantee department level of local governments.
the Federal agency with the predominant interest in the work of
the grantee department vill be responsible for necessary
negotiation, approval and audit of the indirect cost proposal.
6. Negotiation and approve1 of indirect cost proposals for
federally recognized Indian tribal governments. The Federal
agency with the predominant interest in the work of the grantee
department vill be responsible for necessary negotiation,
approval and audit of the indirect cost proposal.
7. Resolution of problems. To the extent that problems are
encountered among the Federal agencies in connection vith 4 and 5
(No. A-87)
E-1S
-------
!§ the Office of Management and Budget will Und
a* required. ^^ I
(No. A-67)
E-16
-------
Change F.S.a. (in Sponsored Projects Administration), sentence
3, to read:
The salaries of professorial and professional staff whose
responsibilities to the institution require administrative work
that benefits sponsored projects may also be included to the
extent that the portion charged to sponsored agreements adminis-
tration is determined in accordance with Section J.6.
Change P.7.a. (in Student Administration and Services)',
sentence 2, to read:
The salaries of members of the academic staff whose responsi-
bilities to the institution require administrative work that bene-
fits sponsored projects may also be included to the extent that
the portion charged to Student Administration is determined in
accordance with Section J.6.
»
Delete J.ff.c. Monitored Workload.
Delete J.6.d. Personnel Activity Reports.
Relabel J.6.e. as J.6.d.
Relabel J.6.T. as J.6.e.
F-17
-------
Paragraph J.17
Add at the end of section a.P "except as indicated in e.
below."
Add a new section e., as follows:
J. 17. e. The cost of interest paid to an external party is
allowable where associated with the following assets, provided
the assets are used in support of sponsored agreements, and the
total cost (including depreciation or use allowance, operation and
maintenance costs, interest, etc.*) does not exceed the rental
cost of comparable assets in the same locality.
(1) Buildings acquired or completed on or after
July 1, 1982.
(2) Major reconstruction and remodeling of existing
•
buildings completed on or after July 1, 1982.
J3) Acquisition or fabrication of capital equipment
(as defined in paragraph J.13, "Equipment and other capital expen-
ditures") completed on or after July 1, 1982, costing 510,000 or
more, if agreed to by the Government.
F-18
-------
APPENDIX G
ADVANCED STATISTICAL TOOLS .
The purpose of this section is to discuss analytical tools
that are useful when analysis of data is required. The
discussion will indicate the range of available tools,
provide a description of what they are intended to do,
and point out some of the limitations and assumptions
implicit in their use.
The tools involve rather staightforward computations
made according to rigid formulas. They perform their
functions regardless of whether they are the wrong tool
for the right problem or whether there are errors or
inconsistencies in the data utilized. Using an analytical
tool requires a basic understanding of the problem.
The statistical tools in this section will be explained
but they will not be covered in depth. It is recommended
that a formal course be taken to effectively apply the
statistical tools.
G-l
-------
Background
The two broad groups of analytical tools are classified
according to the type of relationship that is involved;
tools are either qualitative or quantitive. A qualitative
relationship is one in which two or more things are ,
related but in some nonquantitative manner. An example
is the apparent relationship between stress and heart
attacks. On the other hand, a quantitative relationship
implies that two or more things are not only related
qualitatively, but that the relationship can be measured
and expressed in numerical terms. An example is the learning
or improvement curve theory, which states that as produc-
tion quntity doubles, recurring manhours per unit decrease
at a constant rate. This quantitative relationship has
been measured and verified literally hundreds of times
in cost and price analysis.
It is necessary to distinguish between the relationships
described above and causal relationships. A causal relation-
ship implies that one thing causes another to happen.
Many of us tend to say that because A and R are related,
A causes B or vice versa. The fact is that causality
cannot be established by any analytical technique.
Analysis may be used as evidence to support an assertion
of causality, but it is also must be supported by strong,
logical arguments as well.
There are three basic statistical tools for establishing
a qualitative relationship between two or more variables.
They are distinguished by the types of questions they
answer about the relationship.
THE X (CTI SQUARED) TEST
This is a relatively simple test which can answer the
question: Is one variable independent of another (or
others)? By independt, we mean that one thing does not
appear to influence or occur in concert with the other.
The procedure is incapable of determining the strengh
or quantitative nature of dependence, if it exists.
Some questions to which this procedure miht apply are:
a. Is there a relaionship between absenteeism and pro-
ductivity?
b. Is thee a relationship between contract type and the
nature of the work?
c. Is there a relationship between cost growth and con-
tract type (or nature of the work)?
G-2
-------
rn R R EL AT i n K A \' ?-. LYSIS
This is similar to the procedure described above, except
that the strength (as measured by a statistic called
the correlation coefficient) and direction (either direct
or inverse of the relationship can be determined.
Correlation analysis is useful when the variables of
interest are nonquantitative (such as contract type), or
when the sole interest lies in establishing that two
things are correlated.
ANALYSIS DF VARIANCE
This is analytic technique to cmpare different sets of
data to determine whether they came from the smae popu-
lation or from populations with similar characteristics.
Questions to which this procedure would apply are:
a. Is there a significant difference between the wages
of men and women at a particular plant?
b. Is there a significant defference between the annual
income of different clases of workers in different
industries?
Is there a significant difference between tooling
requirements for machine X versus machine Y?
A quantitative relationship is expressd as a equation.
It may be a ratio, a straight line or a very complicated
mathematical function. All that the statistical tools will
accomplish is to confirm or deny that a particular set of
data can be associated with or described by a particular
G-2(a)
-------
-------
equation. It is your responsibility to specify and justify
your selection of an equation to be used in any analysis in-
volving a quantitative relationship. The tools are flexible
enough to accommodate virtually any reasonable equation
relating two or more variables.
The basic tool for establishing a quantitative relationship
between two or more variables is regression analysis,
which involves finding the coefficients (constants) of a spec-
ified equation so that the sum of the squares of the devia-
tions from that equation are minimized. Regression anal-
ysis is a significant analytical tool that can be categorized
into four groupings: simple linear, simple curvilinear,
multiple linear and multiple curvilinear regression.
Simple linear regression involves relating two variables
(X and Y) by a straight line equation:
Y=A+BX
The regression analysis provides numeric values .of the
constants A and B, measures of the strength of the rela-
tionship between the two variables (such as the correlation
coefficient), and provides statistics that indicate whether
the relationship is significant in a statistical sense. The
equation itself is used to make projections of the variable
Y, given values of the variable X. Other statistics can be
used to develop interval estimates based on selected levels
of probability for those projections.
Simple curvilinear regression is any regression analysis
that employs only one independent (X) variable. For exam-
ple, the equation:
Y=AX
B
is used in learning curve application to predict labor-hour
requirements.
Multiple linear regression is similar to simple linear re-
gression with the exception that there is more than one
driving, or independent, variable. For example, the equa-
tion:
Y=A+B1X1+B2X2
depicts a relationship where the variable Y is determined
G-3
-------
by not one, but two variables, X, and X2.
An example of the application of this relationship is the
classic skill mix problem in the analysis of labor rates
where :
Y * Labor rate
Xi = Time period
Xa - Number of employees
An equation of this kind would allow you to adjust your rate
projections not only for the effect of increases over time,
but for changes in the size of the work force.
Multiple curvilinear regression i s a combination of the
two preceding approaches and invoi ,-s two or more driving
variables, at least one of which is raised to a power. An
example of this equation is:
Y =
+B
This relationship is perhaps tod exotic for most applica-
tions, but is presented here to complete the discussion of
the different types of regression analysis.
ANALYSIS OF COVAREANCE
This is a statistical tool which combines some of the as-
pects of analysis of variance and regression analysis. It
can be extremely useful when you want to relate a variable,
say cost, to driving variables of which some are quanti-
tative and others are qualitative, as in the following ex-
ample :
Y = Cost /unit
XIB Quantity procured (quantitative variable)
X 2= Type of procurement (e.g., sole source,
competitive, etc., a nonquantitative variable)
A number of well -documented computer programs are
generally available to perform the calculations involved in
applying any of these statistical tools. If you are consider-
ing one of these procedures, consult an appropriate text for
a more detailed explanation of the particular tool you are
interested in. Match that explanation with the documenta-
tion for the computer program you are using to insure that
you fully understand the tool and the nature of the result.
G-4
-------
FORECASTING
Forecasting merits special treatment because so much of
pricing involves forecasting. Forecasting is a projection
over time. Examples are a projectipn of a labor rate or a
price index number. The many approaches to forecasting
range from the totally subjective to the totally mathemati-
cal. There are two primary approaches to forecasting any
series of data over time: time series and causal models.
Time series analysis, the first approach, treats time as
the driving variable and attempts to measure changes that
occur in the data over time by considering the following
four factors: secular trends; cyclical variations; seasonal
variations; and irregular fluctuations.
The secular trend is the gradual growth or decline of a
series over a long period of time.
Cyclical variations are expansions followed by contrac-
tions that merge into the next expansion. This sequence
of changes is recurring, but not necessarily periodic. Many
series of labor rates, for example, have strong cyclic
components, the period of which coincides with the length
df union contracts in that industry.
Seasonal variations are those variations in time series
data that result from natural forces such as the seasons
themselves, or from man-made conventions such as the
different numbers of workdays in a particular month.
These factors make month-to-month comparisons of eco-
nomic data misleading unless the data is seasonally adjust-
ed.
Irregular fluctuations in time series are caused by such
factors as unusual weather, labor strife, war. Government
intervention and all forms of unpredictable events. These
fluctuations can be divided into those that are identifiable
and the remaining fluctuations that are the unidentifiable
{or random) residue of the series.
The second approach to forecasting involves the use of
causal models, in which quantitative factors other than or in
addition to time are used as a basis for explaining the be-
havior of the series over time. This approach is extreme-
ly useful when causative factors can be identified and pro-
jected. For example, a company may use GNP projections
n-s
-------
from one of the existing large-scale econometric models as
a basis for long-term sales forecasts, rather than simply
extrapolate their historical sales data. Causal models will
usually employ some type of regression analysis to corre-
late the time series with one or more causal variables.
The need for time series projections occurs time and
again. The techniques employed depend to some extent on
the time periods for which the projection is needed and the
degree of accuracy required for the forecast. In any anal-
ysis of time series, it is important to edit from the data
the effect of any events that you know will occur again and
whose magnitude you can determine from other sources.
For example, if you are working with a series of labor
rates, you should edit the series to remove str- and cost
of living increases (if you have projections of thu^e factors
available from union agreements or other sources) and you
should analyze the residual variation in the data.
Most projections of time series only attempt to project
the secular trend of edited data, ignoring seasonal, cycli-
cal or irregular effects. A projection of the secular trend
is indeed necessary for any time series analysis, but you
should recognize that a trend projection by itself is sub-
ject to considerable variation from reality if strong cycli-
cal, seasonal or irregular effects have been ignored.
Methods used for trend projections range from freehand
extrapolation to sophisticated mathematical models. Lin-
ear or curvilinear regression analyses are recommended
for projections beyond two years. For short-term pro-
jections, regression analysis may prove inadequate be-
cause of cyclical effects. A technique called exponential
smoothing is often used for short-term trend projections.
This technique considers various weights on the most re-
cent data and produces a different projection equation at
each time period. This contrasts with regression analysis,
which uses a single equation to describe the whole series
of data.
Cyclical effects are the most difficult to analyze and for
this reason are usually ignored in all but the most sophisti-
cated analyses. A technique called spectral analysis has
been found useful for measuring the length and intensity of
cycles, but it is difficult to use in making projections.
Seasonal effects should be considered in anv data that are
G-6
-------
representative of a time period less than a year: quarterly,
monthly or weekly data, for example. In some cases, it
also may be necessary to adjust annual data. Seasonal ef-
fects usually are analyzed by developing a series of index
numbers that can be used to eliminate seasonal variations
in data.
Another method of seasonally adjusting data is to use a
moving average when the periods averaged correspond to
the number of seasons. For example, a four quarter mov-
ing average would adjust quarterly data seasonally. This
can be illustrated as follows:
19X2
Unadjusted
jtr. Data
1 36
2 44
3 45
4 106
1 38
2 46
3 47
4 ' 112
Four Quarter
Moving Average
57.75
58.25
58.75
59.25
60.75
Note how the moving average smooths out the severe sea-
sonal swing. It is easier to develop a trend from the moving
average than from the unadjusted data.
A moving average should first be used to smooth data.
After smoothing, the data can be used to develop trends.
There is great dangerthat a moving average will be identi-
fied asthetrendandusedas a basis for establishing prices.
The danger can be illustrated by the following example, in
which a moving average called the cumulative average is
used.
Unit No..
1
2
3
4
5
Actual Hours
100
95
90
85
80
Cumulative
Average Hours
100.0
97.5
95.0
92.5
90.0
G-7
-------
There are four approaches to estimating the cost of Unit
6 based on this data:
Last actual
Trend from actuals
Cumulative average to last actual
Trend from cumulative average
Hour
80
75
90
87.5
A cumulative average will tend to obscure the effect of a
trend in data. It is for this reason that any type of moving
average should be carefully evaluated before it is used as
a basis for pricing.
Irregular variations must be considered on a case by case
basis and a great deal of judgment applied when they are
considered in forecasting.
THE LEARNING CURVE
The learning curve is a tool used primarily to project re-
source requirements. It has been used successfully to
project the direct manufacturing labor hours needed to pro-
duce a known quantity of a product, and is sometimes used
to project the quantity of material required for a produc-
tion run. It has been used to project the dollar costs of
subcontracted items after adjustment of the historical cost
data for inflation.
Historically, the term "learner's curve" was adapted from
the observation that individuals who perform repetitive
tasks exhibit a rate of improvement due to increased man-
ual dexterity. The mental and muscular adjustments an in-
dividual makes from the time he first performs his task
to the time he has repeated it a number of times result in
a reduction in the time required for each repetition of a
uniform unit of work. Psychologists, teachers, personnel
directors, manpower planners and others have used this
principle for a long time. When the improvement factor in
a manufacturing process is subjected to detailed obser-
vation and analysis, the causes of improvement become
clear.
Dexterity on the part of individual workers is only one
of the reasons for reduced manhours per unit of produc-
tion. Changes in the worker's environment and morale,
G-8
-------
changes in the flow process and in work setup, work sim-
plification and engineering changes may all contribute to
improvement (or contribute to disimprovement), but they
are nearly always induced by management actions. Thus,
the learning curve measures and projects not only the cost
effects of improved manual dexterity and a broad group
of factors that might be called management innovations, but
also the interaction between manual dexterity and manage-
ment innovations. For this reason, the term "learning
curve" is a misnomer. Other terms more nearly describe
the actual meaning: improvement curve, cost or time
reduction curve, or experience curve. However, the term
"learning curve" (or 'learner's curve") is used so widely
that it is imperative to use it here. Remember, when you
read it, that all the complexities of causal relationships
are embodied in its meaning. In essence, it represents
the learning of .the firm and is not specifically pinned to
the learning of individuals.
T. P. Wright h^s contributed much in establishing the
learning curve as a. cost measurement device in the aircraft
industry. His article pioneering the idea was published
in the Journal of Aeronautical Sciences, February, 1936,
under the title "Factors Affecting the Cost of Airplanes."
Wright's findings showed that as the number of aircraft pro-
duced in sequence increased, the cumulative average direct
labor input per airplane decreased in a regular pattern.
The regularity of the pattern existed in a ratio relationship
that was exponential (e.g., it revealed a linear function
only when ratios of changes were considered). Learning
curve theory and practice as it is known today received its
initial impetus from this pioneering work.
Both aircraft companies and the Government became inter-
ested in the regular and .predictable nature of production
cost reduction because, among other considerations, the
phenomenon implies that during a time of mobilization a
fixed application of labor and facilities could be expected to
produce greater and greater quantities of defense products
in each successive time period. Accordingly, the Govern-
ment engaged the Stanford Research Institute to study the
validity of the learning curve concept. The method adopted
for this study was a statistical analysis of essentially all
World War II airframe direct labor input data to determine
whether there was sufficient conformity in the data to es-
tablish a standard.
G-9
-------
The study confirmed that the direct labor cost (hours) de- ^F J
dines by some constant percentage over the successively
doubled quantities of units produced. The Stanford study
also validated the concept of a standard or model based on
the World War II findings that could be used as a tool for
cost analysis.
Since World War II. the learning curve concept has been
used by Government procurement agencies to aid in pricing .
selected Government contracts. Its application has been
most conspicuous in airframe production where conditions
were most favorable for its use. More recently, the learn-
ing curve has been used as a cost analysis tool in such pro-
duction industries as electronics systems, machine tools.
ship building, missile systems and depot level mainte-
nance of equipment.
The learning curve theory was developed from observa-
tions of cost behavior, as a function-of sequential aircraft
produced. Certain factors associated with the airframe in-
dustry seem to be necessary to that cost behavior. The
first is the building of a sizable, complex end-item that
requires large numbers of direct labor hours. The many
individual tasks associated with these hours provide myriad
opportunities to learn. A second factor is production in
which unmechanized assembly operations predominate. If
the operations are mechanized or machine paced as are
many fabrication operations, the learning process is inhib-
ited.
Learning curve applications are not limited, however, to
sizable complex end-items. Numerous applications have
been made to relatively simple and stable items such
as shells, trucks and radios. -A Defense Contract Audit
Agency publication (DCAAP 7641.14) provides information
on more that 440 learning curve applications covering a
broad spectrum of weapon systems, subsystems and other
items.
Another factor that influences learning is a continuous
manufacturing process with constant pressure to reduce
manhours. If production breaks are common or long, the
accrued learning is dispersed through reassignment of
workers or even forgetfulness. A fourth factor is the ele-
ment of constant change inthe product.
One other observation concerning major engineering
G-in
-------
changes or model changes is worthy of note. Airframe pro-
duction is characterized by short model/series production
runs. With each change in model the learning curve pheno-
menon tends to repeat itself. That is, when a production
program is completed for a particular airframe model and
a new production is set up for a similar but new model, it
cannot be expected that the first unit of the new model will
continue where the old model left off.
It should be emphasized that while the learning curve is
essentially a trend concept, it is not a time series trend.
Rather, the independent variable is the number of oppor-
tunities to learn, while the dependent variable is cost input
per constant unit of production. At first this independent -
dependent variable relationship may seem obscure. At best
it is not likeij to seem quite as straightforward as a simple
cost per unit time series. You are cautioned to study this
relationship, for it is one of the key concepts that make
the learning curve a useful device for measuring and pre-
dicting change in production cost input.
The Stanford study validated a learning curve model that
is known as the "unit curve " or "Boeing" theory. The
theory can be stated as follows:
As the total quantity of units produced
doubles, the cost per unit decreases by
some constant percentage.
The constant percentage by which the costs of doubled
quantities decrease is called the rate of learning. Anoth-
er useful term, the "slope" of the learning curve, is re-
lated to the rate of learning. It can be expressed as the
difference between 100 and the rate of learning.
The unit curve theory can be expressed in equation or
model form as
B
y = Ax
where
y represents the unit cost (usually expressed in
hours) of the Xth unit,
x represents the unit number,.
G-ll
-------
A is a coefficient (constant) that represents the
theoretical cost (also usually expressed in
hours) of the first unit, and
B is a coefficient (constant) that is related to the
slope and the rate of change of the learning
curve. It can be calculated from the relation-
ship
B = logarithm "slope"
logarithm 2
In this last equation, the slope must be expressed in dec-
imal form rather than the percentage form.
Observations (values of x and y) that are related by the
model
y = AxB
with numerical values for the coefficients, form a straight
line when plotted on log-log paper. The fact, that a learning
curve is a straight line on log-log paper has the tremen-
dous advantage that projection of manhour figures at a
future stage of production can be accomplished simply by
extending the line into the future. This can be done mechan-
ically by physically extending the line, mathematically, or,
for ultimate precision, with the aid of a computer.
Another frequently encountered learning curve model is
the "cumulative average" or "Northrop "theory. This is the
model that was described by T. P. Wright in 1936. The
theory can be stated as follows:
As the total quantity of units doubles,
the average cost per unit decreases by
some constant percentage.
The cumulative average curve theory can be expressed
equation form as
in
y = Ax
where ~y"x is the cumulative average cost of all production
up to and including the Xth unit. The other parameters are
the same as for the unit curve theory. Observations related
by this model also form a straight line on log-log paper,
G-12
-------
to the difference between unit and cumulative average cost,
because each theory will project a totally different result.
When manhour figures that conform to the learning pro-
cess are plotted on log-log paper against the units of pro-
duction to which they apply, the points produced lie on a
straight line called the learning curve. There is no anom-
aly in calling it a curve when it is a straight line; in math-
ematical terminology a straight line is a particular case of
a curve, having a curvature of zero. As previously in-
dicated, data that conform to the theory of the learning
curve (the cost of doubled quantities decreased by some
constant percentage) form a straight line when plotted on
log-log paper. With careful attention to detail, the graphical
approach to learning curve analysis will yield estimates
which approximate those derived through mathematical or
computer-assisted techniques. Accordingly, it is of value
to understand the mechanics of using log-log paper.
The Stanford study revealed that different manufacturers
experienced many different lopes, sometimes on similar
manufacturing programs. In fact, manufacturing data
collected from the World War II aircraft manufacturing
industry had slopes ranging from 69.7% to almost 100%.
The slopes averaged 80%, giving rise to an industry aver-
age curve of 80%. Unfortunately, this industry average
curve is frequently misapplied by practitioners who use it
as a standard or norm. For use in estimating slopes with-
out data on the production cost of the item at the plant of
manufacture, learning curve slopes of similar items at the
manufacturer's plant are a better indicator than industry
averages for the production of the same item in other
plants.
You need to know the slope of the learning curve for a
number of reason's. For one,"it facilitates communication;
it is part of the language of learning curve theory. The
steeper the slope (lower the percent), the more rapidly the
resource requirements (hours) decline as production in-
creases. Accordingly, the slope of the learning curve is
usually an issue in a negotiation.
The slope of the learning curve also is needed to project
follow-on costs using either learning tables or a computer.
As another example, in many production situations, a given
G-13
-------
slope may be established- as a standard based on reliable
historical experience. Learning curves developed from
actual experience on current production can then be com-
pared against the standard slope to determine whether the
improvement on a particular contract is or is not reason-
able.
The primary purpose for developing the learning curve as
a pricing tool is to permit you to predict the cost of future.
production. The prediction is based upon the assumption
(not always true) that the future will behave as did the past.
In terms of the learning curve theory, this assumption
means that the cost (hours) of doubled quantities will con-
tinue to decrease by some constant percentage.
As with any method of projecting the future, the theory
of the learning curve falls short of perfection. Such a
simple model of the real world cannot hope to cover all
pricing situations. However, the learning curve method
provides a reasonable approach to predicting the future if
the historical data approximate a straight-line trend. The
farther historical data points lie from the trend line, the
less confidence you should place in your prediction.
The use of the learning curve is dependent on the methods
companies use to record costs. An accounting or statis-
tical record system must be devised by a company so that
data are available for learning curve purposes. Otherwise,
it may be impossible to construct a learning curve. Such
costs as manhours per unit or dollars per unit must be
identified with the unit product. It is perferable to use man-
hours rather than dollars. The latter contain an addition-
al variable, the effect of inflation or deflation (wage rate
changes), which is absent in the former.
In any event, the record system must have definite cut-
off points for such costs that will permit identification of
the costs with the units involved. Most companies use a lot
release system whereby costs are accumulated on a job or-
der in which the number of units completed is specified and
costs are cut off at the completion of that number of units.
The continuous process method, as distinguished from
the job order system, also yields costs identified with end-
item units, but in this case the costs usually are equated
with "equivalent" rather than actual units.
Because a job order system commonly is used, the unit
G-14
-------
cost is not the actual cost per unit for any particular unit
in the lot. Rather, it is an average cost for all units in the
lot. This means that when lots are plotted on graph paper,
the unit value corresponding with the average cost value
must be found. In nearly all cases this unit value (x) is the
median withinthelot that should be given the average value.
Thus, as the program progresses, the midpoint of each
succeeding lot is taken as the plot point for the quantity
(x). For example* if a lot is made up of units 91 through
100 of a given contract, the unit value of the plot point
would be 95. The calculation is based on the cumulated
number of units in all preceding lots plus one-half the
number in the lot under consideration:
(90 + 10 = 95)
T
Because the early units in the first lot usually decline very
rapidly (arithmetically speaking), some distortion may oc-
cur in locating the representative value at the midpoint of
the first lot. This is especially true if the first lot contains
ten or more units. The distortion is compensated for by
a rule of thumb, which states that when the first lot con-
tains ten or more units, one-third the lot size should be
chosen as the unit value estimate of the first lot plot point.
Conversely, when the first lot contains less than ten units,
one-half of the lot size should be chosen as the unit value
for the first lot plot point. It is an arbitrary rule, which
applies to the first lot only, but it approaches the true mid-
point more closely than the other arbitrary rule of taking
half the lot size in every case. True lot plot points can
be calculated from a rather complicated formula, or by a
computer. However, use of a computer to determine the
historical trend line and project the future cost eliminates
the need to complete lot midpoints.
The preceding discussion of the learning curve theory has
been limited to basic considerations. You will need to ex-
plore and understand the following topics before you can ap-
ply the learning curve technique successfully in all situa-
tions.
a. Fitting the best straight line through learning data us-
ing regression analysis.
b. Unit versus cumulative average data as a straight line.
G-15
-------
c. The use of unit, lot, cumulative average and cumula-
tive total data.
d. Adjusting the projection for major changes in the item.
e. Adjusting the projection for breaks in production.
f. The use of ratio tables to assist in the projection of
trends.
g. The use of computer-assisted computations in anal-
ysis.
C5-16
-------
APPENDIX H
SELECTED REPORTS FROM
THE
"ACCOUNTING MINI-SERIES"
PLANNING AND COST ADVISORY BRANCH
PROCUREMENT AND CONTRACTS MANAGEMENT DIVISION
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
H-l
-------
• x
1
Subpart 15,8
Price Negotiation
The price negotiation clause in the Federal Regulations is the clause
which gives us our authority to review contractor books and records and
details the requirements for cost and price analysis.
Under the Federal Procurement Regulations the applicable section was
Subpart 1-3.8-Price Negotiation Policies and Techniques. When the Federal ,.-=.,
Government switched to the Federal Acquisition Regulations the operating
clause becane Subpart 15.8-Price Negotiation.
There were a mxnber of changes between FPR and FAR. Generally, FAR added
definitions, reworded the regulations in a clearer format and in doing
so provided a better understanding of the regulations, and grouped the
clauses according to subject matter.
Two important changes were made. The OF-60 was replaced by SF-1411.
The SF-1411 is formatted as a cover sheet without the detail of the OF-
60. The specific requirement for audits was deleted. Instead of
$100,000 and $500,000 audit threshholds, for fixed price and cost type
proposals, respectively, FAR only states $500,000 is the threshhold for
field pricing support, without any specific mention of audits.
H-2
-------
Subpart 15.8-Price Negotiation
Wfe will be summarizing each clause in Subpart 15.8-Price Negotiation.
Any significant deviations from the FFR will be explained and any new or
different requirements will be explained.
Attached are three appendices-Appendix 1 is the Federal Acquisition Regulations
Subpart 15.8-Price Negotiation, Appendix 2 is a cross index of FFR 1-3.8
to FAR 15.8, and Appendix 3 is a cross index of FAR 15.8 to FPR 1-3.8.
Appendix 2 illustrates where the FAR regulations came frcm and Appendix 3
illustrates where the FPR provisions went.
15.800-Scope of subpart-Frcm FPR 1-3.8 and quoted below:
"This subpart prescribes the cost and price negotiation policies and
procedures applicable to initial and revised pricing of (a) negotiated
prime contracts (including subcontract pricing under them when required)
and (b) contract modifications (including modifications to contracts
awarded by formal advertising)."
15.801-Definitions-FPR 1-3.807
Ihis clause provides definitions for the various terms used in the price-
negotiation process. Among the terms are cost analysis, price analysis,
and field pricing support, which is a new term. In the FAR field pricing
support is defined as "... a review and evaluation of the contractor's...
proposal by...field support personnel."
Although field support personnel is never truly defined it seems to be
anyone other than the Contracting Officer.
15.802-Folicy-FPR 1-3.801 and 1-3.807
Basically it states the Contracting Officer should purchase goods and
services for a fair and reasonable price, price each contract separately,
and don't include contingencies in the contract price.
15.803-General-FFR 1-3.801 and 1-3.809
This clause provides general guidance for the Contracting Officer.
guidance consists of general steps and procedures to follow while
H-3
Die
-------
the procurement process is ongoing. ^fc\
15.804-Cost or Pricing Data-FPR 1-3.807
Sane changes have been made to this clause on cost and pricing data.
Cost or pricing data is defined as "all facts as of the time of price
agreement that prudent buyers and sellers would reasonably expect to
affect price negotiations significantly."
FAR 15.804 describes the requirements for certified cost or pricing data.
The requirements for cost or pricing data remains the same as under FPR-
negotiated contracts over $500,000, or any contract modification over
$500,000. The exemptions to submission of cost or price analysis remains
the same-adequate price competition, catalog or market prices of conmercial
items sold to the general public, or set by law or regulation. FAR does add
in the regulations specific percentages to be used in determining when items
qualify as sold to the general public in substantial quantities (FAR
15.803{f)).
•
Even if an item is exempt from submission of a certificate of current cost
or pricing data, the requirement still exists that a price analysis must
be performed on the item to determine the reasonableness of the price.
In addition, the SF 1411 is included the Subpart 15.8 along with the
instructions. The SF 1411 replaces the OF-60.
15.805-Proposal Analysis-FPR 1-3.807 and 1-3.809
This clause is the basis for cost analysis performed by EPA.
15.805-1-General-No real changes fron the FPR merely a restatement of the
FPR.
15.805-2 and -3-Price Analysis and Cost Analysis-No changes. Msrely a
restatement of the FPR.
15.805-4-Technical Analysis-This clause is new. FPR's only reference to
technical analysis was for the auditor to incorporate the technical report
H-4
-------
into the audit report. FAR prescribes the minimum factors the technical
analysis should cover. These items include the need for the nunber and
kinds of labor and labor mix, quantities and kinds of materials, etc.
15.805-5-Field Pricing Support-This clause replaces FTR 1-3.809-Contract
Audit as a Pricing Aid. There have been significant changes to the
audit requirement. The term audit has been replaced by field pricing
support. As we understand the term, field pricing support means anyone
but the Contracting Officer.
Under FPR there was a requirement that all fixed price contracts and
modifications over $100,000 and cost type contracts and modifications
over $500,000 shall be audited. Under FAR, the only requirement is any
contract or modification requiring certified cost or pricing data (over
$500,000}, the Contracting Officer shall request a review by field pricing
support. FAR does state that this may include an audit by the cognizant
audit office. There is no audit threshold in the FAR. This is a
significant change.
Audits can still be requested. FAR addresses audits in 15.805-5 (d)-(f).
FAR in 15.805-5(d) states that only auditors shall have general access
to contractor's books and records. But, this does not preclude the
Contracting Officer or his representative access to records. This clause
is an addition from the FPR. Vfe still have access to contractor's books
and records.
Clauses (e) and (f) remain the same as in FPR.
FAR 15.805-5(g) is a new clause. The clause states that whenever field
pricing support was requested, the AGO upon completion of the field
H-5
-------
pricing report shall send to the auditor a copy of the field pricing
report, without the audit report or the technical analysis report. This
clause does not seem to be applciable to EPA because we do not use the
AGO system. However this may become a requirement in the future.
FAR 15.805-5(i) is the clause that gives us the authority to review
subcontract proposals. This clause states that the -prime contractor is
responsible for the cost analysis before awarding any subcontract.
However, the Contracting Officer may request a separate cost analysis to
ensure reasonableness of the price.
15.806-Subcontract Pricing Considerations-FPR 1-3.807
Basically this clause represents a restatement of the certified cost or
pricing data requirements in 15.804.
15.807-Prenegotiation Objectives-New Clause
This clause requires the Contracting Officer to establish a prenegotiation
position before negotiating a contract.
15.808-Price Negotiation Memorandun-1-3.811
This clause establishes the information, as a minimum, that should be
included in a summary of negotiation. The Contracting Officer is still
required to provide to the auditor a summary of negotiation whenever an
audit report is issued.
15.809-Forward Pricing Agreements-1-3.701
This clause establishes the basic requirements for forward pricing
agreements. The requirements include when a forward pricing agreement
should be negotiated and how the forward pricing agreement should be u
H-6
-------
15.810-Should Cost Analysis-New Clause
Should cost analysis as defined in this clause means a review of the
contractor's entire operation. This includes both technical'and cost
areas.
Should cost as EPA uses it generally means the contractor's proposal is
priced reflective of current cost or pricing data, i.e., the contractor
is not buying in. As defined in FAR should cost represents an operations
audit rather than a cost audit.
15.811-Estimating ^stsns-1-3.809
Basically this clause is the same as FPR and states that estimating
system reviews should be performed on certain contractor's in order to
reduce the effort spent in reviewing those contractor proposals.
H-7
-------
COMPENSATION FOR PERSONAL SERVICES
AN ANALYSIS OF THE RECENT COST PRINCIPLE CHANGES
(March 6, 1985)
Prepared by
John J. Zabretsky
Cost Policy and Rate Negotiation Section
Planning and Cost Advisory Branch
H 8
-------
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) compensation cost
principle for contracts with commercial contractors (31.205-6)
is an almost verbatim transcription of the Defense Acquisition
Regulation (BAR) and the Federal Procurement Regulation
(FPR) compensation cost principles. However, the DAR and
FPR versions of the principle underwent significant revision
just prior to the issuance of the FAR.
The revised DAR and FPR evolved from the old FPR and
DAR, and numerous Board of Contract Appeals decisions. The
revised version contained five general criteria for determining
allowability of compensation for personal services:
1) a current year•criterion - a change to the FPR which
evolved from the DAR;
2) an established plan or practice criterion - a change
to the FPR and the DAR;
3) no presumption of allowability for non-notified
changes - a new requirement for both the FPR and the
DAR ;
4) an other cost principles criterion - no change from
the FPR or DAP and,
5) a reasonableness criterion - contained in both the
FPR and DAR but the revised principle has significant
changes which (a) shifts the burden of proof to the
contractor, (b) changes the reasonablenss-of-total-
compensation concept to one of reasonableness-of-
elements-of-compensation, and (c> eliminates the use
of Internal Revenue Code deductible amounts as a
maximum of allowable compensation in almost all
cases.
H 9
-------
Compensation for Personal Services
An Analysis of Recent Changes
The cost principles on corapensaation in the Defense
Acquisition Regulation (DAR) and the Federal Procurement
Regulation (FPR) were revised in March, 1983, and December,
1983, respectively. The principles in both were almost the
same, with no substantive differences. The Federal Acquisition
Regulation (FAR), which was effective April 1, 1984, contained
an almost verbatim version of the DAR and FPR principles.
Because the issuance of the FAR followed so closely to the DAR
and FPR changes to the compensation cost principle, there was
very little opportunity to work with and become familiar with
the revision. This paper discusses the FAR compensation cost
principle and the changes made to the princiole in. the DAR and
FPR.
FAR Part 31.205-6, "Compensation for Personal Services",
is the longest and most detailed of the forty-eight commercial
cost principles. The definition contained in the principle is
so broad that it includes all types and forms of payments to
employees: "Compensation for personal services includes all
remuneration paid currently or accrued, in whatever form and
whether paid immediatly or deferred, for services rendered by
employees to the contractor during the period of performance."
Because compensation can take so many forms, the cost
principle contains more guidance on determining allowability
H 10
-------
then any other. Alienability under the principle is determined
by five general criteria applicable to all forms of personal
services compensation and ten additional special requirements
for particular types of compensation.
Gene r a 1 C _r. i t e r i a
Compensation is allowable subject to the following general
criteria:
(1) Compensation must be for work performed by the employee
in the current year,
(2) The compensation in total must be reasonable for the
work performed,
(3) The compensation must conform to the contractor's
established compensation plan or practice followed so consistently
as to imply, in effect, an agreement to make the payment,
(4) No presumption of allowability exists where the
contractor introduces major revisions of existing compensation
plans or new plans and does not notify the Government, and
(5} A costs unallowable under another cost principle is
not allowable solely on the basis that it constitutes compensation,
Additional Requirements
Additional requirements for certain forms of compensation
are also contained in the cost principle for:
1. Labor-management agreement compensation.
H 11
-------
2. Salaries and wages.
3, Domestic and foreign differential pay.
4. Bonuses and incentive compensation.
5. Severance pay.
6. Backpay.
7. Stock options, stock appreciation rights, and phantom
stock plans.
8. Pensions.
9. Deferred compensation.
10. Fringe benefits.
Changes in the additional requirements are covered in
other papers in this series. This paper will deal with the
five- general criteria for determining allowable personal
compensation costs.
Current YearCriterion
"Compensation must be for work performed by the employee
in the current year and must not represent a retroactive
adjustment of prior years' salaries or wages".
The FPR requirement prior to the December, 1983, change
was simply stated as "services rendered during the period of
contract performance". The FAR requirement for a current year
test evolved from the CAR which limited allowability to services
performed in the current year and expressly disallowed retroactive
adjustments of prior year salaries.
H 12
-------
The only exceptions in the FAR to the current year general
rule are (1) severence pay, (2) back pay for certain violations
of Federal laws, (3) pension plan prior and past service^costs,
(4) deferred compensation accounted for in compliance with CAS
415, and (5) certain fringe benefit costs.
Severence pay in the FPR was covered in its own paragraph
(15.205-39), not in the compensation cost principle. This
change evolved from the DAR.
The FAR requires deferred compensation to be accounted
for in accordance with CAS 415 and pension costs to be
accounted for in accordance with CAS 412 and 413. The FPR did
not have these requirements.
Established Plan or Practice Criterion
"Compensation must be based upon and conform to the terms
and conditions of the contractor's established compensation
plan or practice followed so consistently as to imply, in
effect, an agreement to make payment."
Prior to the December, 1983, change the FPR requirement
was simply, "compensation (must be) paid under the contractor's
established policy". The DAR had similar language before it
was changed in June, 1983.
No Presumption of Allowability Criterion
"No presumption of allowability will exist where the
H 13
-------
contractor introduces major revisions of existing compensation
plans or new plans and the contractor;
1) has not notified the cognizant AGO either before
implementation or a reasonable period after implementation; and
2) has not provided the Government, either before
implementation or within a reasonable period after it, an
opportunity to review the allowability of the changes."
Prior to the December, 1983, change, the FPR had no
language requiring advance notification of changes to established
compensation plans. The FPR language limited compensation
determinations to an after the fact, incurred cost review of
salaries and wages paid to individuals. Since there was no
notification requirements, very few advance agreements on
compensation levels were executed. Without advance agreements,
compensation levels were being negotiated after costs were
incurred and paid, a very difficult position to negotiate from.
Other Cost Principles Criterion
"Costs that are unallowable under other paragraphs of this
Subpart 31.2 shall not be allowable... solely on the basis that
they constitute compensation for personal services."
Although the wording is different, both the FPR and the
DAR compensation cost principles contained a similar
prohibition against reclassifying otherwise unallowable costs
as compensation to make the costs allowable.
H 14
-------
Reasonableness Criterion
"The compensation in total must be reasonable for the work
performed? however, specific instructions on individual
compensation elements must be observed where they are prescribed.1
The compensation cost principle is unique in that it is the
only cost principle with specific language for determining
reasonableness. In fact, the FAR devotes an entire paragraph
to guidance on when and how reasonablenss determinations should
be made. Both the FPR and the DAR had language on reasonableness
but the recent revisions to both changed how it is to be
determined. The FAR provides the same guidance as the FPR and
DAR as to when reasonableness tests should be applied. "The
tests (for reasonableness) need be applied only when a general
review reveals amounts or types of compensation that appear
unreasonable or unjustified." All compensation need not be
subjected to the reasonableness tests, however, "compensation
costs under certan conditions give rise to the need for special
consideration". The conditions are in instances where:
1) Compensation is to owners of closely held
corporations, partners, sole proprietors, members of immediate
families or persons who are contractually committed to acquire
a substantial financial interest in the contractor's enterprise.
2) Changes in compensation policy result in
substantial increases coincident with an increase in the ratio
H 15
-------
of government contracts to other business.
3} The contractor's business is such that it is not
subject to the normal restraints of competitive business.
4) Compensation costs are in excess of amounts
deductible under the Internal Revenue Code.
Remember these are situations when compensation should be
given special consideration and the tests for reasonableness
should be applied. It does not mean that the existence of any
of the above situations makes some part of compensation
unallowable.
The FAR overall test remains somewhat the same as the PPR
and DAR. "Compensation for personal services will be considered
reasonable if the total compensation conforms generally to
compensation paid by other firms of the same size in the same
industry, or in the same geographic area for similar services
or work performed". Although this is difficult to determine,
in appeals cases, the boards of contract appeals have held
that surveys of compensation levels in the same industry or in
the.same geographic area for similar services provide the best
measure for comparison.
Because the contracts appeals boards interpreted FPR and
DAR as placing the burden of proof on the Government to show
that compensation is unreasonable, the responsibility for
gathering survey information was also placed with the Government.
The FAR, however, has added new language which changes this:
H 16
-------
"in questionable cases the contractor has the responsibility
to support the reasonableness of compensation in relation to
the effort performed". We will have to wait to see how the
boards handle the shift in the burden of proof responsibility.
A second significant change to the reasonableness test
occurs in the total-compensation concept. Despite the FAR
wording that/ "Compensation will be considered reasonable if
the total compensation (emphasis added) conforms generally to
compensation paid by other firms..." the principle later adds
a caveat that states, "this does not prevent the Government
from challenging the reasonableness of an individual element
of compensation...". This language is new and gives the
Government the opportunity to challenge such items as bonuses,
management incentive awards, cash awards, etc., on an individual
basis, without regard to total compensation. Again, we will.
have to wait to see how the boards interpret the "total
compensation" requirement of the first reasonableness test
in relation to challenging an individual element.
Another change to the reasonableness test in the new
principle is not one that was added, but rather one that wasn't
included. Under the FPR and DAR, compensation of individual
employees was considered reasonable if it was not in excess
of costs deductible under the Internal Revenue Code. Use of
the Code was a general test of reasonableness. For all individual
H 17
-------
compensation, cost in excess of the amount deductible was
generally unallowable. Under the new principle, costs in
excess of those deductible under the Internal Revenue Code are
unallowable only for closely held corporations.
Epilogue
Despite all of the recent changes to the reasonableness
criteria of the compensation cost principle, in a recent Comp-
troller General Report (GAO/NSIAD-85-1, October 12, 1984),
General Accounting Office was unable to reach a conclusion on
the reasonableness of compensation paid by twelve aerospace
contractors. The report said the definition of reasonableness
embodied in the DAR (which is the same as the FAR) lacks.
quantitative criteria and there is no generally accepted pay
survey to which contractors can be compared. The publicly
available surveys - prepared by the Bureau of Labor Statistics
and the American Management Association - and the surveys the
contractor participates in, have doubtful utility because the
scope is usually too general or too limited. The report states
that this fundamental problem of acceptable surveys led the
Air Force to conclude that the current cost principle, for
all practical purposes is, unenforceable and should be changed.
The Air Force, in coordination with the other services, submitted
proposals to the DAR council - the DOD body responsible for
administering the DAR - to change the regulation in March, 1984.
As of the date of this paper, the DAR Council is continuing its
efforts to revise the criteria.
H 18
-------
FACILITIES CAPITAL COST OF MONEY (FCCM)
AN ANALYSIS OF THE FPR AND FAR PROVISIONS
Prepared by
William D. Cooke
Cost Policy and Rate Negotiation Section
Planning and Cost Advisory Branch
Procurement and Contracts Management Division
H-19
-------
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Prior to 1976, there was no provision for reimbursing
contractors for Facilities Capital Cost of Money (FCCM)
associated with the use of their assets. Contractors were
expected to recover such costs out of their profit/fee.
CAS 414, issued in 1976, provided a formula for FCCM computa-
tion. However, Temporary Regulation 40 gave agencies discretion
to either allow FCCM as a cost and change their fee policies
or disallow FCCM and retain their fee policies intact.
Pursuant to Office of Federal Procurement Policy Letter
80-7, the Federal Procurement Regulation (FPR) was amended
in 1981 to allow FCCM provided that a profit/fee offset was
made. Where FCCM was not proposed as an element of cost, a
waiver clause was inserted into the contract. The changes
brought about by the Federal Acquisition Regulations are:
1. No requirement for fee offset although EPA's FAR
Supplement does require this adjustment.
2. FCCM is not prohibited in cost reimbursable and cost
share contracts.
3. The language in the waiver clause is different.
H-20
-------
Facilities Capital Cost of Money
An Analysis of the FPR and FARProvisions
I. CAS 414 and FPR Temporary Regulation 40
The concept of creating a regulatory provision to allow
government contractors to recover costs of capital has existed
for years. While pure interest expense was and continues to be
unallowable, it was recognized that all contractors experienced
a cost in connection with the use of their assets. Since
there was no provision in the cost principles of the Defense
Acquisition Regulations (DAR), NASA Procurement Regulations
(NASAPR) or Federal Procurement Regulations (FPR) for allowance
of costs of capital, the government's policy was that such
costs were financed out of profit or fee. The government's
profit/fee treatment varied agency by agency. EPA's fee
policies, contained in the EPAPR's (41 CFR 15-3.808-50) were
practically verbatim to those of NASA. The fee weights
considered, among_ other factors, the contractor's "investment
in facilities capital". Theoretically, a contractor's
incentive for modernizing its facilities would be the
government's consideration of this investment when making fee
determination. Contractors were not particularly pleased
with this approach. However, everyone recognized that there
was no simple method agreeable to all parties by which to
measure cost of facilities capital.
H-21
-------
The first effort towards allowing cost of capital came
not in the form of a cost principle,, but a Cost Accounting
Standard (CAS) emanating from the CAS Board. Standard No. 414
was issued with an effective date of October 1, 1976, and
provided a complicated computation leading to a Facilities
Capital Cost of Money (FCCM) factor. Without going into
detail, the basic components used in deriving FCCM were:
(1) the net book value of a contractor's fixed
assets,
(2) the official government interest rate, determined
semi-annually by the Treasury Department and used for certain
claims and renegotiation settlements, and
(3) the contractor's indirect cost allocation
pools and bases.
Basically, the FCCM factor(s) consisted of identifying
the fixed assets by indirect cost center, multiplying their
net book values by the appropriate interest rate{s), and
dividing the result by the allocation base(s). The resulting
rate(s) was to be used in a manner similar to the indirect
cost rate(s). It would be applied to the applicable base in
each contract to enable the contractor to recover FCCM costs
on a contract-by-contract basis*
H-22
-------
At the time CAS 414 was promulgated, the exemptions and
special provisions pertaining to CAS were much more limited
than now. The two most significant exemptions which would
later affect EPA were not yet in existence: (1) the concept
of modified coverage and (2) the exemption of small businesses
from all CAS requirements. It thus appeared that most
profit-making government contractors were to be reimbursed
for FCCM. Up to this point, the General Services
Administration (GSA) had always amended the FPR to fully
incorporate each new CAS.
This pattern was broken in the case of CAS 414. FPR
Temporary Regulation (TR) 40 was issued effective October 1,
1976. The base thrust of this regulation was to give agencies
the option over whether to allow FCCM computed under CAS 414
or not. Keeping in mind that FCCM was supposedly covered in
determining profit/fee, the government's concern was that
unconditional allowability of FCCM under CAS 414 would result
in increased costs to the government and duplication of FCCM
recovery by contractors (as both an element of cost and
fee/profit). Accordingly, TR 40 provided that: (1) agencies
could retain their fee policies intact and treat FCCM generated
by CAS 414 as unallowable costs, or (2) agencies could allow
CAS 414-generated FCCM but would have to change their profit/fee
policies to ensure that "on an overall basis,... aggregate
prices will not increase". EPA chose the former approach.
H-23
-------
Consequently, PIN No. 76-64, issued effective October 1, "^ /
1976, provided that CAS 414 was withdrawn from applicability
to EPA contracts.
II. Amendments to the FPR
TR 40 remained in effect for over 4 years. During this
time, CAS regulations were issued providing more exemptions,
such as small business, modified coverage, and a raising of
the initial CAS-covered contract threshhold amount from
$100,000 to $500,000. It thus appeared that allowance of
FCCM strictly within the CAS framework would exclude a broad
segment of government contractors from coverage. The next
move came from the Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP)
in the form of Policy Letter 80-7. The major features of
this Policy Letter were the following:
A. TR 40 should be abolished.
B. All contractors, regardless of CAS status, would be
allowed FCCM, computed using the methodology contained in
CAS 414.
C. Since prevailing policy held that FCCM was previously
covered in profit/fee, agencies must insure that FCCM was not
reimbursed as both an element of cost and fee. Therefore, if
FCCM was proposed and negotiated as a cost on a given contract,
the profit/fee shall be correspondingly reduced (offset).
H-24
-------
D. It was presumed that an offerer who did not propose
FCCM as an element of cost intended to recover it in profit.
4?"
Therefore, the resulting contract would contain a waiver
clause in which the offerer would waive his rights to recover
FCCM as an element of cost.
At the time of this Policy Letter, OFPP strictly speaking
had no regulatory authority; their pronouncements were solely
advisory. Both DOD and GSA did amend their procurement
regulations. GSA's took the form of incorporating the Policy
Letter in its entirety in Temporary Regulation 61, effective
June 15, 1981. TR 61 abolished TR 40 and established the
policy Letter as official FPR policy regarding (1) determination
of profit and fee and (2) allowability of FCCM.
The final FPR-era policy action occurred November 29,
1982, when TR 61 was codified into the relevant portions of
the FPR. Amendment No. 225 to the FPR changed the following
subparts:
1. Subpart 1-3.808 - Price Negotiation policies and
Techniques - This subpart dealt with profit/fee policy.
The major facets included in this subpart were:
a. Profit/Fee Offset - l-3.808-3(b)(2) stated
that if FCCM were to be allowed as a cost, the profit/fee must
be correspondingly reduced.
H-25
-------
b. Waiver Clause - l-3.808-4(c) stated that if
FCCM was not proposed as an element of cost a waiver clause
reading as follows would be inserted into the contract:
"The contractor is aware that facilities capital
cost of money is an allowable cost but waives the right to
claim it under this contract."
2. Subpart 1-3.13 - Cost of Money for Capital Employed
in Facilities in Use and Capital Assets Under Construction -
This was a new subpart which basically covered the details
associated with computing FCCM. CAS 414 was invoked as the
means for computations. The method of recovering FCCM
(through negotiation similar to overhead rates) was also
discussed.
3. Part 1-7 - Contract Clauses - The standard contract
clauses for cost reimbursement-type contracts were augmented
by the FCCM waiver clause.
4. Subpart 15 .205-5 - A new cost principle was added
to cover FCCM. The key provisions:
a. FCCM must be measured in accordance with CAS
414 and FPR 1-3.13.
b. Adequate records (memorandum entries acceptable
for FCCM itself) must be maintained by contractor.
c. FCCM is not allowable in cost-reimbursable or
cost sharing contracts.
H-26
-------
d. FCCM must be "specifically identified or
proposed in cost proposals relating to the contract under
which it is to be claimed. Although this was a reference to
the waiver provision, no cross reference to Subpart 1-3.8 was
made.
Since the profit/fee offset requirement gave agencies
the option as to which offset method could be used, EPA
amended the EPAPR (15-3.808-50(b) to provide that where PCCM
was proposed as an element of cost, the profit/fee would be
reduced by an identical dollar amount (dollar-for-dollar
offset).
III. FAR Policy
When FAR was first enacted, the FCCM provisions followed
the DAR more so than the FPR. The differences, most of which
exist as of the date of this paper, were as follows:
A. The most significant difference is that FAR does
not require a profit/fee offset or reduction when FCCM is
proposed as an element of cost. Since there is no
prohibition against such an offset, EPA's FAR Supplement,
EPAAP 1515.970-2(a)(3) required a dollar-for-dollar offset.
B. At the time of enactment, FAR did not contain a
section comparable to FPR 1-3.13, the subpart containing the
details behind computing FCCM. FAR has been recently amended
H-27
-------
with the addition of a new subpart, 30.5, which essentially
replaced FPR 1-13.3.
C. Unlike FPR, FAR does not prohibit FCCM in cost
reimbursable or cost sharing contracts.
D. The language of the waiver clause is different.
FAR 52.215-31 states the .following:
"If the Contractor did not include facilities capital
cost of money as a proposed allowable cost, it shall be
deemed that the Contractor waived the right to claim it
under this contract."
While FAR is not supposed to result in major policy
changes, the mere change in language may produce real changes,
perhaps through a body of case law.
H-28
-------
Contract Closeout Action at EPA Headquarters and
Final Audit of EPA's Cost Reimbursement Contracts
Vhen does contract closeout begin? -.The closeout process begins when the
contract final delivery date expires. P&CMD then requests a certification
from the Project Officer that the item has been delivered. EPA's Contract
Administrator receives the contractor's Completion Voucher, or its Cumulative
Claim. The Contract Administrator asks the Washington Cost Advisory
Operations (WCAO) to request a final audit and furnish a closing statement,
and provide comments which will assist in the final closeout of the
physically completed cost-reimbursement (CR) type contract.
Contractor Submissions
The Contractor's Completion Voucher is discussed on page 3, paragraph 8
of the instructions for completing Public Vouchers and reads in part:
The contractor shall submit its Completion Voucher in the number
of copies shown in paragraph three to the servicing finance office
and a copy to the Contracting Officer, when the following has been
accomplished:
(a) Physical completion of all performance provisions of the
contract and acceptance of the final report.
(b) All direct costs have been incurred and booked. Indirect
costs may be claimed at the provisional rate(s) if final
rate(s) are not yet available. The contractor shall
identify the Completion Voucher by typing Completion
Voucher in the upper right corner of the SF 1034 beside
the voucher number.
The Completion voucher may be submitted to EPA's C.O. promptly on
completion of required work/ but no later than one year from the
contract completion date. Upon approval of that invoice or completion
voucher, and after the Contractor's compliance with all terms of the
contract, the Government shall promptly pay any balance of allowable
H-29
-------
cost and that part of the fee (if any) not previously paid to the
contractor, but shall be limited to 85% of the Fixed Fee. The withheld
fee (15%) is payable upon submission of appropriate closing documents,
after final audit of the contract has been completed, and all audit
exceptions have been resolved. Page 4, of the Guide for Preparing Standard
Form, SF1035, Continuation Sheet of the Public Voucher instructs the
Contractor on the following:
A - Contractor's Claim for the Reimbursement of the Purchased Material
and Subcontracted Items.
B - Costs Reouiring Prior Authorization and Approval (Subcontracts
under General Provisions).
C - Withholding and Release of Contract Reserves
D - Contractor's Completion Voucher and Cumulative Claim and
Reconciliation - To the Contracting Officer
1 - When physical completion of performance provisions of the
contract is done and EPA has accepted the Final Rsport if
required.
2 - When all costs applicable to the contract have been incurred.
Contractor is to type Completion Voucher in number block.
this will notify the C.O. that the contract is ready for
final audit.
E - Contractor's Final Voucher and Closing Documents - The
contractor subnits his final Voucher to the EPA Contracting
Officer after the following has been accomplished:
1 - Completion of the final audit of the contract
2 - Audit exceptions or guestioned costs have been resolved.
There is a mutual agreement between the Contractor and the
C.O. on the final (total) allowable costs and the fixed
fee of the contract.
3 - Acceptable final fixed overhead (indirect cost) rates for
all fiscal periods involved under the contract have been
approved by the C.O. or his authorized representative.
4 - Final Voucher shall be identified as such and should include
the remaining reserves, and any adjustments to vouchered
H-30
-------
costs necessitated by the final settlement of the contract
price. The Contractor's Pelease and the Contractor's
Assignment of Refunds, Rebates, Credits and Other Amounts
shall be submitted with the Contractor's FINAL TOUCHES.
WCAO Steps
The Contractor's Completion \foucher and the Contractor's Cumulative
Claim and Reconciliation, when available, are enclosed with the request
memo to WCAO. At this point, WCAO (1) examines the Official Contract
File; (2) determines the total dollars obligated by review of the Basic
Contract and all Modifications for the following:
Total Estimated Cost
Fixed Fee
$xxxxx
XXX
Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) $xxxxx
(3) determines the contract period, i.e., the effective date of contract
through last date of performance in the Basic Contract or the last Modifi-
cation issued showing an extention of the contract period: (4) determines
whether the contract's Negotiated Indirect Cost Bates (FPR contracts)
or Indirect Cost (FAR contracts) clause established ceiling indirect
cost rate(s)? (5) determines whether the contract has a level of effort
clause, and (6) checks whether the contract contains any ceiling amounts
for travel or other types of direct costs.
Once the contract has been reviewed, the WCAO prepares a letter requesting
a final audit. Ihis letter is generally addressed to the cognizant
branch office of the Defense Contract Audit Agency, the organization
H-31
-------
which performs the great majority of contract audits for EPA. Based on
the Contract Audit Closing Statement, which includes the results of the
final audit and other information, the cost advisory office makes its
reconmendations for close-out of the particular contract.
Final Audit
Wiy is final audit of Cost reimbursement Type Contracts a requirement
prior to contract closeout? The Contracting Officer (Contract
Aininistrator) needs an official document recommending the total
allowable cost and the total amount of fee (if any) payable to the
Contractor for satisfactory completion of all work required under the
specific contract. The contractor must agree with the recommended amounts
of cost and fee, prior to closeout and retirement of EPA's Official
Contract File.
How was the government's right to audit the contractor's accounting
records incorporated into the CR type contracts? EPA's "General Provisions
for Cost-Reimbursement Type Research and Development Contracts (With
Fixed Fee), contain forty three (43) approved clauses, designated EPA
Form 1900-17. Prior to ^>ril 1, 1984, these clauses were incorporated
into EPA contracts by reference.
One of the problems with final audit is the length of time it takes from
our request for final audit to when we actually receive the final audit
report. The DCAA auditors advised me that their first priority is to
audit initial pricing proposals, and furnish reports to the requesting
H-32
-------
Contracting Officer (CO) or his representative, Ihe DCAA auditor's
prompt issuance of initial pricing reports to CO helps speed up the
negotiation of a contractor's proposal and award of the contract. With
the award of a contract, the contract work may begin as soon as possible.
My point is that the length of time it takes to receive the final audit
report fron DCAA is not due to the duration of the actual final audit,
but rather due to the priorities of DCAA.
Another reason for the delay in the receipt of final audit reports on
completed cost-type contracts is the contractor's failure to furnish the
proposed final indirect cost rate(s) to the Contracting Officer with a
copy to the cognizant audit activity, within ninety (90) days after the
end of the contractor's fiscal year. Hiis contractual requiranent is
found in paragraph-(b) of the Negotiated Overhead Rates clause in EPA's
General Provisions for FPR covered cost-Reimbursement type contracts and
the Allowable Cost and Payment clause, which is incorporated by reference
in FAR covered cost-type contracts.
If a contractor does not submit its indirect cost rate proposal within
the ninety (90) day period, EPA's Cost Policy and Rate Negotiation.Section
sends the contractor a letter requesting its indirect cost proposal for
EPA cost-reimbursable contracts active during the contractor's specific
Fiscal Year. The referenced letter reads in part as follows:
The negotiated overhead rate clause in your cost reimbursement
type contracts with the Environmental Protection Agency reouires
that you provide a final indirect cost rate proposal within 90
H-33
-------
days after the end of your fiscal year. Vfe have not received your
proposed final rates for the fiscal year(s) ended .
Please submit your proposal (or notification that you have
submitted your proposal to a Federal audit agency) as soon as
possible addressed as follows:
Mr. John J« Zabretsky
Chief, Cost Policy and Pate Negotiation Section
Planning and Cost Mvisory Branch (PM-214-F)
Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, D.C. 20460
Wiy is the Reconciliation of Indirect Cost Claimed so important prior
to completion of contract closeout? The indirect cost rates, used by
the contractor and applied to the appropriate base(s), on EPA Form 1900-
34 Cumulative Claim and Reconciliation should not exceed any maximum
ceiling rate(s) incorporated in the contract.
The Negotiated Indirect Cost Rates clause in Cost Plus Fixed Fee
(CPFF) cost reimbursement contracts reads in part as follows:
"Final rates shall not exceed those listed below; provided however,
that in the event rates developed by the cognizant audit activity on
the basis of actual allowable costs are less than the maximum rate
agreed to herein, then the rate established by such cognizant auditor
and accepted by the Contracting Officer shall apply. The Government
will not be obligated to pay any additional amounts on account of
rates above the maximum ceiling rates set forth below."
FAR has set time limits on when contracts should be closed out. Physically
completed contracts should be closed-out within six months for fixed-price
contracts, thirty-six months for contracts involving indirect rate settlements
and twenty months for all other contracts (FAR 4.804-1).
H-34
-------
For Final Audit of a Level of Effort (L.O.E,) term type CR Contract;
The Audit Feport requested by the cost advisory office must furnish a
statement on the total Direct Labor Hours expended by the Contractor.
Ihis statement is required for the Contracting Officer, as the L.O.E
contract clause establishes the Government's best estimate of the total
nunber of Direct Labor Hours required for the contract, for example,
30 - 40 - or 60,000 man-hours. The same L.O.E. clause also provides
that an equitable downward adjustment of the fee will be made, if the
contractor does not expend 90% of the Direct Labor Hours established in
the contract.
Quick Closeout Procedures
Unit Two of the Acquisition Handbook discusses Quick Closeout Procedures
as authorized in FAR 42.708, and includes Attachment 1 entitled Final
Audits - Desk Review Procedures to be followed by the Contract
Administrator. The procedures basically allow the quick close out of a
contract if most of the costs have been audited and we have final indirect
cost rates for all but one of the fiscal years involved.
H-35
-------
Direct Labor onFixed Rate Contracts
In recent years, EPA had increased the number of fixed rate
contracts it has awarded. In these contracts, there are fixed
hourly rates which include direct labor, indirect expenses and
profit. These contracts may provide EPA contractors with
opportunities to increase their profits beyond the amounts
negotiated.
Included below, are actual examples of how contractors can
increase their profits on EPA's fixed rate contracts.
The RFP requests nineteen (19) professional disciplines with
levels 1 thru 4 in each discipline.
Example A
The contractor proposed four rates. One rate for each level, PI
thru P4. The proposed rates are weighted average rates of the
contractor's labor categories. The contractor's categories and
proposed rates are as follows:
Proposed
Unloaded
Rates
$36.12/Hour
EPA
Category
Level
P-4
Contractor's
Labor
Category
Principal
Project Manager
Current
Unloaded
Hourly Rate
$39.06
25.41
A 55.9% difference between the rates.
$28.88/Hour
P-3
Principal
Project Manager
Senior Associate
S39.06
25.41
20.52
A 90% difference between the low and high rates.
H-36
-------
Proposed
Unloaded
Rates
$21.65/Hour
EPA
Category
Ley el
P-2
Contractor1s
Labor
Category
Project Manager
Senior Associate
Associate
Current
Unloaded
Hourly Rate
$2S.41
20.52
16.00
A 59% difference between the low and 'high rates.
$12.52/Hour
P-l
Associate $16.00
Analyst 12.01
Research Assistant 9.72
A 65% difference between the low and high rates.
How much can this contractor increase his profits?
P-4
Loaded Proposed Rate
Loaded Principal Rate
Loaded Project Manager Rate
$ 99.16/Hour
$107.28/Hour
$ 69.79/Hour
If the contract is awarded at the proposed loaded rate, the con-
tractor loses $8.12/hour whenever he uses the principal and reaps
an additional profit of $29.37 whenever he uses a project manager.
P-3
Loaded Proposed Rate
Loaded Principal Pate
Loaded Project Manager Rate
Loaded Senior Associate Rate
$ 79.39/Hour
$107.28/Hour
$ 69.79/Hour
56.41/Hour
If the contract is awarded at the proposed loaded rate, the con-
tractor loses $27.89/hour whenever he uses the principal. He reaps
an additional $9.60/hour and $22.98/hour whenever he uses a project
manager and senior associate, respectively.
R-37
-------
P-2
Loaded Proposed Rate
Loaded Project Manager Pate
Loaded Senior Associate Rate
Loaded Associate Rate
$59.51/Hour
$69.79/Rour
$56.4I/Hour
$43.98/Kour
If the contract is awarded at the proposed loaded rate, the con-
tractor loses $10.28/hour if a project manager is used. He reaps
an additional $3.10/hour and $15.53/hour whenever he uses a senior
associate or associate, respectively.
P-l
Loaded Proposed Rate $34.39
Loaded Associate Rate $43.94
Loaded Analyst Rate $32.99
Loaded Research Assistant Rate $26.70
If the contract is awarded at the proposed loaded rate, the
following occurs for each of his proposed categories.
Associate
Analyst
Research Assistant
He loses $9.56/hour
He reaps an additional $1.40/hour
He reaps an additional $7.69/hour
H-38
-------
Example B
The contractor is a small business with less than 20 employees
The contractor proposes the average rates of the individuals
expected to work in each discipline and level.
Environmental Engineer P-4
Employee A
Employee B
Employee C
Average Rate
Loaded Average Rate
Loaded A Rate
Loaded B Rate
Loaded C Rate
$33.42/Hour
28.93/Hour
22.95/Hour
27.06/Hour
$67.57/Hour
83.45/Hour
72.24/Hour
57.31/Hour
If the contract is awarded at the proposed rate, the contractor
loses $15.88/hour on employee A, $4.67/hour on employee B and
reaps an additional profit on employee C of S10.26/hour.
Civil Engineer P-2
Employee A
Employee B
Average Rate
Loaded Average Rate
Loaded A Rate
Loaded B Rate
$14.78/Hour
10.17/Hour
12.47/Hour
$31.14/Hour
36.91/Hour
25.91/Hour
If the contract is awarded at the proposed rate, the contractor
loses $5.77/hour on employee A and reaps an additional $5.75/hour
on employee B.
H-39
-------
Example C
The contractor is a large business and has a salary structure of
levels 1 thru 30. The contractor's policy is to midpoint each
level for proposal purposes. He also combines the average or
midpoint rate for several levels to compute a rate for one of
EPA's levels.
Examples of his levels and unloaded rate ranges are as follows:
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
1
16
22
25
26
28
30
Mi n imum
Rate
$' 4.55
11.66
18.63
23.55
25.52
33.23
56.85
Midpoint
Rate
$ 5.36
15.10
24.84
31.40
34.03
44.31
75.80
Maximum
Rate
$ 6.16
18.55
31.05
39.25
42.54
55.38
94.75
For one level four discipline the contractor combines levels 25,
26, and 28. Therefore the range of rates for the level four
discipline is $23.55/hour to $55.38/hour (a 135% difference
between low and high rate).
Assume level 22 is the proposed rate.
Loaded Midpoint Rate (Proposed Rate) S57.13/Hour
Minimum Loaded Rate 42.85/Hour
Maximum Loaded Rate 71.42/Hour
The contractor makes an additional profit of $14.28/hour if an
employee making the minimum rate is used and loses $14.29/hour if
an employee making the maximum rate is used.
H-40
-------
Now suppose the contractor combines several of his levels to get
the proposed unloaded rate.
Level 25
Level 26
Level 28
Average Rate
Loaded Rate
$31.40/Hour
34.03/Hour
44.30/Hour
$36.58/Hour
$84.13/Hour
The minimum loaded rate for level 25 is $54.17/hour. The maximum
loaded rate for level 28 is $127,37/hour.
If an employee at the minimum rate for level 25 is used, the con-
tractor makes an additional profit of $29.96/hour.
If an employee at the maximum rate for level 28 is used, the con-
tractor loses $43.24/hour.
Remember! The employees at the minimum rate for level 25 meet the
RFP educational and experience requirements.
H-41
-------
Example D
The contractor is a medium size firm with serveral divisions.
Average rate for specific individuals were proposed for each
discipline and level.
Labor Rate Loaded Rate
Employee A
Employee B
Employee C
Employee D
Average Rate
S22.72/Hour
25.00/Hour
22.36/Hour
32.69/Hour
$25.69/Hour
$ 70.44/Hour
77.51/Hour
69.33/Hour
101.35/Hour
$ 79.65/Hour
If the contract is awarded at the proposed rate, the following
occurs:
Contractor reaps an additional $9.21/hour on employee A. Con-
tractor reaps an additonal $2.14/hour on employee B. Contractor
reaps an additional $10.32/hour on employee C. Contractor loses
$21.70/hour on employee D.
H-42
-------
Example E
The contractor is a large company. For proposal purpose's company
wide average rates are used. The rates of over 800 employees are
used to develop the rates.
Civil Engineer P-l
Low Rate
High Rate
Average Rate
Loaded Average Rate
Loaded Low Rate
Loaded High Rate
$ 7.50/Hour
$14.75/Hour
S11.24/Hour
$32.10/Hour
$21.41/Hour
$42.12/Hour
If the contract is awarded at the proposed rate, the contractor
loses $10.02/hour if the high rate employee is used and reaps an
additional profit of $10.69/hour if the low rate employee is
used. There are 35 employees in this category and 19 have rates
-5
below $11.24/hour.
Civil E ng ineer P-3
Low Rate
High Rate
Average Rate
Loaded Average Rate
Loaded Low Rate
Loaded High Rate
$14.88/Hour
$28.85/Hour
$19.74/Hour
$56.36/Hour
$42.49/Hour
$82.38/Hour
If the contract is awarded at the proposed rate, the contractor
loses $26.02/hour on the high rate employee and reaps an additional
profit of $13.87/hour on the low rate employee. There are 79
employees in this category and 40 are below $19.74/hour.
H-43
-------
Civil Engineer P-4
Low Rate
High Pate
Average Rate
Loaded Average Rate
Loaded Low Rate
Loaded High Rate
$ 22.19/Hour
$ 56.73/Hour
$ 28.82/Hour
$ 82.30/Hour
$ 63.37/Hour
$162.00/Hour
If the contract is awarded at the proposed rate, the contractor
loses $79.70/hour on the high rate employee and reaps an additional
profit of $18.93/hour on the low rate employee. There are 20
employees in this category and 12 employees are under $28.82/hour. '• .
In the above examples, I have shown that a contractor can gain or
lose on a fixed rate contract. However, EPA contractors are not
in business to lose money. Only in rare circumstances will a
contractor give us anyone making more than the proposed rate.
The following example illustrates how EPA can be taken in by a
contractor's explanation of his rates.
H-44
-------
Example F
The RFP required approximately twelve (12) rates. The contractor
proposed four rates (PL, P2, P3, and P4). The proposed rates were
average rates of the employees expected to work on the contract.
A comparison of the technical and cost proposal disclosed individ-
uals included in the technical proposal which were not in the cost
proposal. The contractor was requested to submit rates for each
of the RFP categories and to include all of the individuals in the
technical proposal. There were twenty-five individuals in the
technical proposal which were not included in the cost proposal.
The contractor's response was that the individuals in the tech-
nical proposal not included in the cosh proposal have higher
hourly rates that other proposed individuals. Therefore, if we
forced them to propose separate rates for each discipline and
level, the hourly rates would increase.
The CO accepted the contractor's explanation and accepted the
proposed four rates.
The rat'es of the additional 25 individuals are as follows:
P4
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
Average
$ 57.56
45.94
42.86
41.61
64.68
64.68
145.53
48.51
$ 63.92
Proposed Average $60.05
H-45
-------
P3
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H :
I
J
Average
$ 50,90
32.10
40.52
120.02
39.84
129.36
56.60
36.52
44.77
45.43
$ 59.61
Proposed Average $33.72
p_2_
A
8
C
Average
$ 38.75
29.90
72.36
$ 47.00
Proposed Average $24.37
PI
A
B
C
D
Average
$ 9.96
13.59
11.65
15.53
$ 12.68
Proposed Average $15.63
A review of the contract financial management report disclosed
only 3 of the 25 additional individuals were used during the
first ten months of the contract (5 or 6 these were supposed to
be key personnel). Two were used in the Pi category and one in
the P3 category. The hourly rates of all three were lower than
the average rates proposed. In the PI category A was used at
$9.96/hour. The average rate proposed was $15.63. A was used
for 1183 hours. This resulted in additional profit of $6707.61
for the contractor.
H-46
-------
In conclusion, our cost analyses as a minimum should include the
following:
1. Determine the method the contractor is using for
computing direct labor.
2. If rates for individuals are proposed - determine the
actual rate and category of each individual proposed.
3. If weighted average rates are used - determine the
weighting and rates of individuals or categories
proposed.
4. If straight averages are used - determine the number
of persons in each category, the rates of each one
and the high and low range.
5. Compare names in the technical proposal with the cost
proposal.
6. Compare the hours proposed with the hours available.
(In Example E - Civil Engineer PI, the contractor has
35 employees in this category and 19 of them have an
hourly rate less than the proposed average hourly
rate. If EPA is only asking for 6,000 hours per year,
the 19 lower than average rate employees could easily
fill these hours).
H-47
-------
7. Do not accept a no-cost questioned report from DCAA
as meaning the rates are acceptable. You have to have
information in your workpapers supporting why the
rates are acceptable or nonacceptable.
There are numerous other ways a contractor can increase his profit
on fixed rate contracts. Some of these are:
1. Hire new employees at lower than proposed rates.
2. Hire new consultants at lower than proposed rate.
3. Use lower paid consultants and charge EPA as if a
regular employee was working.
4. Use personnel who do not meet the education and
experience requirements of the contract and are
paid at a lower rate.
5. Charge EPA for overtime hours, but do not pay the
employees for overtime.
6. Hire temporary employees who do not receive fringe
benefits.
EPA has several contractors whose entire business consists mostly
of EPA work. In the past, we have awarded mostly cost reimburs-
able - level of effort contracts. Therefore, most of our con-
tractor's contracts are cost-reimburseable. Then we award a few
fixed rate contracts for the contractor to mix with their many
cost reimbursable contracts. We have placed these contractors in
H-4R
-------
-------
30 smas^ evn
e qons ut
s^tgoad aTei^^ SZTUJTXBUI o^ ABM
o^ uot^isod
-------
LIST OF REFERENCES
Federal Aquisition Regulations (EAR)
Environmental Protection Agency Acquisition Regulations (EPAAR)
Cost & Price Manaul (1981) GSA training course
Cost Analysis Techniques (1984) EPA: FCMD
Government Federal Contract Costs; Melvin Rishe
Federal Publications, Inc., Washington DC; 1984
P&CMD Employee Presentations:
John Zabretsky, CPRM; "Cost Accounting Standards" (June 1984).
"Condensation For Personal Services: An analysis of the FAR
Changes" (Jan 1985)
Charles Young, WCAO; "Changes from FPR to ERR, Subpart 15.8"
(Jan 1985)
William Cooke, CPRN; "Facilities Capital Cost of Money"
(Jan 1985)
Armed Services Procurement Regulation Manual for contract Pricing;
Commerce Clearing House; Chicago, IL; Out of Print.
James Peoot, WCAO; "Financial Monitoring, Contracts Between One and
Five Million Dollars" (June 1986).
DCAA Contract Audit Manual (Jan. 1989)
6-410.2 and 6-410.4
Federal Contracts Reports (August 1988 and April 1989)
(Revised 8/90)
-------
-------