COST  ANALYSIS

                                   GUIDE
 \s
I
   GO
   CT3
   O
Pf^OCUREMEWT AND CCMERACTS I^PWAGEMEIJr DIVISION
    U. S.  ENVIQRMylENIPiL PRDThLTlCN AGEl^CY
                401 M St. , S.W.
            Washington, B.C.  20460
         Original dated January 1985
                Revised August 1990

              HEADQUARTERS LIBRARY
              ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
              WASHINGTON 1C. 20460

-------

-------
                           TABLE OF CUWllMTS



  (i)  FCKEWDRD

   I.  GLOSSARY

  II,  ACQUISITION PROCESS

 III.  EPA COST REVIEW AND POLICY BRANCH

  IV..  SF 1411:  THE COST PROPOSAL

   V.  PRICE ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES

  VI.  COST ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES
          Direct Labor
          Direct Materials & Other Direct Costs
          Indirect Costs

 VII.  FEE/PROFIT

VIII.  FACILITIES CAPITAL COST OF MX3EY

  IX.  "FAIR AND REASONABLE"

   X.  IMPORTANCE OF DOCUMENTATION

  XI.  EPA FINANCIAL ANALYSIS SECTION
(Revised 8/90)

-------
APPENDIX

  A.  Cost Accounting Standards

  B.  Selected FAR and EPAAR Clauses

  C.  40 era Part 33 (EPA), Procurement Under Assistance

  D.  CMB Circular A-122 "Cost Principles for Non-Prof it Organizations"

  E.  CMB Circular A-87 "Cost Principles for State & Local Governments"

  F.  CMB Circular A-21 "Cost Principles for Educational Institutions"

  G.  Statistical Tools for Cost Analysis

  H.  Selected Reports from the "Accounting Mini-Series, Planning and
      Cost Advisory Branch

            •Changes From FPR to FAR:  Subpart 15.8' by Charles Young
            •compensation For Personal services:  An Analysis of the
             FAR Changes' by John Zabretsky
            'Facilities Capital Cost of Money:  An Analysis of the FPR
             & FAR Provisions' by William Cooke
            'Contract Closeout Action at EPA Headquarters and Final
             Audit of EPA's Cost ReiJribursement Contracts' by Warren
             Gilbertson
            'Direct Labor on Fixed Rate Contracts' by Marty Cook



LIST OF REFERENCE SOURCES
(Revised 8/90)

-------
(i
                                 I.  GLOSSARY
          ACTUAL COST;  A cost sustained in fact, on the basis of
          costs incurred, as distinguished from  forecasted or
          estimated costs.

          ALLOCABLE COSTt  A cost is allocahle if it is assignable
          or chargeable to one or more cost objectives in accordance
          with the relative benefits received or other equitable
          relationships defined or agreed to between contractual
          parties.

          BILLING RATES;  Indirect cost rates used for interim
          reimbursement on contracts.

          CONTRACT PRICING;  A series of actions used to obtain,
          evaluate, assess, verify,  and judge cost or pricing
          information, and to record the steps taken to ascertain
          that prices agreed to have been determined (found) fair
          and reasonable.
          CONTRACT PRICING PROPOSAL;
                 The instrument required of
for the submission or identification of cost
       The basic SF 1411  (Contract Pricing
      u
          an offerer
          or pricing data.
          Proposal) is the general purpose form, providing a
          standard format by which an offerer submits to the
          Government a summary of estimated (or in some instances
          incurred) costs suitable for detailed review and analysis.

          COST ACCOUNTING;  A system of accounting analysis and
          reporting on costs of production of goods or services,
          or of operation of programs, activities, functions or
          organizational units.  The system may also embrace cost
          estimating,  determination of cost standards based on
          engineering data,  and comparison of actual and standard
          costs for the purpose of aiding cost control.

          COST ANALYSIS;  The review and evaluation of a contractor's
          cost or pricing data and of the judgmental factors applied
          in projecting from the data to the estimated costs in
          order to form an opinion leading to a position on the
          degree to which the contractor's proposed costs represent
          what contract performance should cost, assuming reasonable
          economy and efficiency.  It includes appropriate veri-
          fication of cost data, evaluation of specific elements of
          costs and projection of these data to determine the effect
          on price factors like cost necessity,  allowances for
          contingencies, and the basis used for allocation of
          overhead costs.
                1-1

-------
COST ESTIMATING;  The process of forecasting a future result
in terms of cost, based upon information available at the
time.

COST INCURREDi  A cost identified through the use of the
accrued method of accounting and reporting or otherwise
actually paid.  Cost of direct labor, direct materials,
and direct services identified with and necessary for the
performance of a contract, and all properly allocated
and allowable indirect costs as shown by the books of the
contractor.

COST OBJECTIVE;  A function, organizational subdivision,
contract, or other work unit for which cost data are de-
sired and for which provision is made to accumulate and
measure the cost of processes, products, jobs, capitalized
projects, and so forth.

COST OR PRICING DATA;  Data consisting of all facts ex-
isting up to the time of agreement on price, which prudent
buyers and sellers would reasonably expect to have a
significant effect on price negotiations.  Being factual,
these data are types of information that can be verified.
They do not reflect on the accuracy of the contractor's
judgment about estimated future costs or projections;
they do, however, reflect on the data upon which the
contractor based his judgment.

COST OVERRUN (or UNDERRUN);  A net change in contractual
amount over (under) that contemplated by a contract
target price (FPI contract), estimated cost plus fee
(any cost-reimbursement type contract), or redeterminable
price (FPR contract), due to the contractor's actual costs
being over (under) target or anticipated contract costs,
but not attributable to any other cause of cost growth
(e.g., quantity changes, engineering changes, economic
changes, or changes in estimates of program/project
costs).

COST REIMBURSEMENT;  Refers to a family of pricing
arrangements that provide for payment of allowable,
allocable and reasonable costs incurred in the performance
of a contract, to the extent that such costs are prescribed
or permitted by the contract.  In the case of a cost-plus-
fixed-fee arrangement, costs may vary under or over the
initially agreed-to estimate, but the fee remains fixed
as an expressed dollar amount and is not subject to
adjustment by reason of contractor cost experience during
the life of the contract.
                             1-2

-------
 COST  RISK;   An  assumption  of  possible monetary  loss  or  gain
 in  light  of  the job  or  work to  be  done.   One  of the  elements
 to  be considered in  the negotiation  of a  fair and  reasonable
 price> as well  as in determining the type of  contract under
 which performance will  occur.

 DEFECTIVE COST  OR PRICING  DATA:  Certified cost or pricing
 data  subsequently found to have been inaccurate, incomplete
 or  noncurrent as of  the effective  date of the certificate.
 In  this case, the Government  is entitled  to an  adjustment
 of  the negotiated price, including profit or  fee,  to exclude
 any significant sum  by  which  price was increased because
 of  the defective data,  provided the  data  were relied upon by
 the Government.

 DIRECT COST;  Any cost  that is specifically identified  with
 a particular final cost objective, but not necessarily  limited
 to  items  that are incorporated in  the end product  as
 material  or  labor.

 ECONOMIC  PRICE  ADJUSTMENT;  An alteration permitted  and
 specified by contract provisions for the  upward and/or  down-
 ward  revision of a stated  contract price  upon the  occurrence
 of  certain contingencies that are  specifically  defined  in
 the contract.

 ESCALATION;  A  term  traditionally  used to indicate an upward
 or  downward  movement of price.  "Economic price adjustment"
 is  the contemporary  term used to express  the  sense of
 "escalation."

 ESTABLISHED  CATALOG PRICE;  A .price  included  in a  catalog,
 price  list,schedule or other form that (1) is  regularly
maintained by a  manufacturer or vendor, (2) is  published or
made available  for inspection by customers, and (3)  states
 prices at which  sales are  currently  or were last made to a
 significant  number of buyers constituting  the general public.

 ESTABLISHED MARKET PRICE;  A current price, established in
 the usual and ordinary  course of trade between  buyers and
 sellers free to  bargain, which can be substantiated  from
 sources independent of  the manufacturer or  vendor,
 although  the data may be prepared  by the  seller.

 FEE;   In  specified cost-reimbursement pricing arrangements,
 fee represents  an  agreed-to amount beyond  the initial estimate
of  costs.   In most instances,  fee  reflects  a  variety of
factors,  including risk, and is subject to  statutory limita-
 tions.  Fee may  be fixed at the outset of performance,  as in
a cost-plus-fixed-fee arrangement,  or may vary  (within a
contractually specified minimum-maximum range)  during
performance, as  in a cost-plus-incentive-fee arrangement.

                           1-3

-------
FIELD PRICING SUPPORT;  Involves the analysis of contractor
pricing proposals by any or all field technical and other
specialists, including plant representatives, administrative
contracting officers, contract auditors, price analysts,
quality assurance personnel, engineers, and legal andf
small business specialists.

FINAL COST OBJECTIVE;  A cost objective that has allocated
to it both direct and indirect costs and, in the contractor's
accounting system, is one of the final accumulation points.

FINAL RATES;  Used for determination of final indirect costs
allowable to contracts.  Rates are determined on a contractor
fiscal year basis.

FIXED PRICE;  Refers to a family of pricing arrangements
whose common discipline is a ceiling beyond which the Govern-
ment bears no responsibility for payment.  In the case of
a firm fixed-price arrangement, the agreed-to price is not
subject to any adjustment by reason of the contractor's
cost experience in the performance of the contract.

FORWARD PRICING;  A pricing decision made in advance of
performance, based on analysis of comparative prices, cost
estimates, past costs or combinations of such considerations.

GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE;  Indirect expenses, including a
company's general and executive offices, executive compensa-
tion, the cost of staff services such as legal, accounting,
public relations, financial and similar expenses and other
miscellaneous expenses related to the overall business.

INDIRECT COST:  Any cost not directly identified with a
single final cost objective but identified with two or more
final cost objectives or with at least one intermediate
cost objective.  Also referred to as overhead or burden.

INDIRECT COST POOL;  A grouping of projected or incurred
costs identified with two or more cost objectives but
not specifically identified with any final cost objective.

LEARNING CURVE;  A tool of calculation used primarily to
project resource requirements, in terms of direct manu-
facturing labor hours or the quantity of material (for this
purpose, usually referred to as an improvement curve) re-
quired for a production run.  Used interchangeably with the
term "improvement curve," the concept of a learner's curve
was adopted from the observation that individuals who perform
repetitive tasks exhibit a rate of improvement due to
increased manual dexterity.
                            1-4

-------
LEVEL OF EFFORT;  The devotion of talent or capability to
a predetermined level of activity, over a stated period of
time, on the basis of a fixed-price or cost-reimbursement
pricing arrangement.  Payment is usually based on effort
expended rather than on results achieved.

MARKETPLACE;  The commercial world; the realm of business,
trade and economics; the environment in which buyers and
sellers bargain to achieve their separate and mutual ends.

OVERHEAD;  (See Indirect Cost.)

PRICE;  A monetrary amount given, received or asked in
exchange for property or services, expressed in terms of a
single item or unit of measure for such property or services.

PRICE ANALYSIS;  The process of examining and evaluating a
prospective price without evaluation of the separate cost
elements and proposed profit of the individual offeror whose
price is being evaluated.  It may be accomplished by a
comparison of submitted quotations, a comparison of price
quotations and contract prices with current quotations for .
the same or similar items, the use of rough yardsticks
(dollars per pound, for instance), or a comparison of pro-
posed prices with independently developed Government
estimates.

PRICING:  The process of establishing the amount or amounts
to be received or paid in return for providing goods and/or
performing services.

PRICING ARRANGEMENT;  An agreed-to basis between contractual
parties for the payment of amounts for specified performance.
Usually expressed in terms of a specific cost-reimbursement
or fixed-price type arrangement.

PROFIT;   Generally characterized as the basic motive of
business enterprise; on occasion referred to as "the wages
of risk."   In contract pricing, profit represents a projected
or known monetary excess realized by a producer or performer
after the deduction of cost (both direct and indirect)
incurred or to be incurred in the performance of a job,
task or series of the same.

PROFIT CENTER;  A discrete, organizationally independent
segment of a company, which has been charged by management
with profit and loss responsibilities.
                           1-5

-------
PROFIT OBJECTIVE;  That part of the estimated contract price
objective or values that the contracting officer concludes
is appropriate for the procurement at hand.  Where cost
analysis is undertaken, a profit objective should be
developed.  Developed, that is to say, after a thorough
review of proposed contract work and all available knowledge
regarding an offeror as well as an analysis of the offerer's
cost estimate, and a comparison of it with the Government's
estimate or projection of cost.

REASONABLE COST;  A cost is reasonable if, in its nature or
amount, it does not exceed what would be incurred by an
ordinarily prudent person in the conduct of competitive
business.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS;  A solicitation document used in
negotiated procurements.  When an RFP so states, the
Government reserves the right to award a contract based on
initial offers received without any written or oral
discussion with offerers.

REQUEST FOR QUOTATIONS;  A solicitation document used in
negotiated procurements.  An RFQ is a request for information.
Quotes submitted in response to it are not offers that the
Government may accept without some confirmation or discussion
with offerers.                                                 *^>

RETROACTIVE PRICING;  A pricing decision made after some or
all of the work specified under contract has been completed,
based on a review of contractor performance and recorded cost
data.

SAMPLING;  Method of obtaining statistics from a large body
of data without resorting to a complete census of the data.
Two broad methods of selecting samples are probability
sampling (in which sample units are selected according to
the law of chance) and nonprobability sampling {in which
personal choice, expert judgment or some other nonprobabilistic
rationale is used to select sample units).

SHOULD COST;  A concept of contract pricing that employs an
integrated team of Government procurement, contract administra-
tion, audit, and engineering representatives to conduct a
coordinated, in-depth cost analysis at the contractor's plant.
Its purpose: to identify uneconomical or inefficient practices
in the contractor's management and operations, to quantify
the findings in terms of their impact on cost, and to
develop a realistic price objective for negotiation that
reflects the outcome of the should-cost effort.
                            1-6

-------
(I
VALUE ANALYSIS:  A systematic and objective evaluation of
the function of a product and its related cost.  Its purpose
is to ensure optimum value.  As a pricing tool, it provides
insight into the inherent worth of a product.

VARIABLE COST;  A cost that changes with the rate of
production of goods or the performance of services.  As
distinguished from "fixed" costs (which do not change with
the rate of production or performance), there may be
"semivariable" costs (neither entirely fixed nor variable)
and "variable" costs as defined here.

VISUAL ANALYSIS;  The visual inspection of an item or its
drawings, from which a general estimate may be made about
probable value.  In most instances, visual analysis deals
with obvious, external features.

WEIGHTED GUIDELINES METHOD:  A technique of negotiated
procurement the Government uses to insure consideration of
the relative value of appropriate profit factors in estab-
lishing a profit objective and conducting negotiations.
Also used as a basis for documenting and explaining the
final pricing agreement reached between buyer and seller.
Appropriate profit factors include contractor's input to
total performance, contractor's assumption of contract cost
risk, record of contractor's performance, selected factors
(such as source of resources) and any special profit
consideration.
                                      1-7

-------

-------
II-  ACQUISITION PROCESS






     1.  Definitions



     2.  Regulatory Requirements for Cost Analysis



     3.  Definition of Cost Analysis, Cost or Pricing Data and



         Price Analysis



     4.  Certified Cost or Pricing Data



              a.  Vhen Required



              b.  Certificate of Cost or Pricing Data



              c.  Exemptions



     5.  Responsibilities of the Contracting Officer in the



         Pricing Decision



              a.  Price Analysis



              b.  Cost Analysis



              c.  Technical Analysis



     6.  Audit Requirements



     7.  Who Performs Cost and Price Analysis at EPA

-------

-------
              II.  THE ACQUISITION PROCESS
ACQUISITION means the acquiring by contract, with appropriated
funds of supplies or services  (including construction) by
and for the use of the Federal Government through purchase
or lease, whether the supplies or services are already in
existence or must be created, developed, demonstrated, and
evaluated.  Acquisition begins at the point when agency needs
are established and includes the description of requirements
to satisfy agency needs, solicitation and selection of
sources, award of contracts, contract financing, contract
performance, contract adninistration, and those technical
and management functions directly related to the process of
fulfilling agency needs hy contract.

Contracting officers are the Government's agents in the
acquisition p-rocess.  They are responsible for assuring
compliance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) in
fulfilling the Government's needs.

As part of this responsibility, contracting officers should
fulfill these needs at a reasonable cost.

It is this responsibility that the Cost Analysis Guide is
intended.  With cost or price as a consideration, this
section will examine the FAR 15.8* section governing the .
negotiation of price.
*Federal Acquisition Circular 84-5, effective April 1, ].9ft5
 has been incorporated in this section.
                             II-l

-------
Regulatory Requirements for Cost Analysis [FAR 15.805-Kb) 3
When cost or pricing data are required,  the contracting
officer shall make a cost analysis to evaluate the reasonable-
ness of individual cost elements.

In addition, the contracting officer should make a price
analysis to ensure that the overall price offered is fair
and reasonable.

When cost or pricing data are not required, the contracting
officer shall make a price analysis to ensure that the overall
price offered is fair and reasonable.
Definitions of Cost Analysis,
Analysis [FAR 15.801]
Cost of Pricing Data and Price
"Cost Analysis" means the review and evaluation of the
separate cost elements and proposed profit of

     (a) offerer's or contractor's cost or pricing data,  and

     (b) the judgmental factors applied in projecting from
         the data to the estimated costs,  in order to form
         an opinion on the degree to which the proposed
         costs represent what the contract should cost,
         assuming reasonable economy and efficiency.

"Price analysis" means the process of examining and evalua-
ting a proposed price without evaluating its separate
cost elements and proposed profit.

"Cost or pricing data" means all facts as of the time of
price agreement that prudent buyers and sellers would reason-
ably expect to affect price negotiations significantly.  Cost
or pricing data are factual, not judgmental, and are  therefore
verifiable.  While they do not indicate the accuracy  of the
prospective contractor's judgment about estimated future costs
or projections, they do include the data forming the  basis
for that judgment.  Cost or pricing data are more than
historical accounting data; they are all the facts that can
be reasonably expected to contribute to the soundness of
estimates of future costs and to the validity of determinations
of costs already incurred.  They also include such factors as
(a) vendor quotations; (b) nonrecurring costs; (c) information
on changes in production methods and in production or
purchasing volume; (d) data supporting projections of business
                         II-2

-------
prospects and objectives and related operations costs;
(e) unit-cost .trends such as those associated with labor
efficiency; (f)  make-or-buy decisions (g)  estimated resources
to attain business goals; and (h)  information on management
decisions that could have a significant bearing on costs.
 'Field pricing support" means a
contractor's or
pricing support
subcontractor's
personnel [(See
review and evaluation of the
proposal by any or all field
15.805-5(a)(2)].
                        II-3

-------
When is Certified Cost or Pricing Data Required?  [FAR15.804-2

(a)(l)  Except as provided in 15.804-3, certified cost or
        pricing data are required before accomplishing any
        of the following actions:
        (i)  The award of any negotiated contract (except
             for unpriced actions such as letter contracts)
             expected to exceed $100,000.

       (ii)  The modification of any sealed bid or negotiated
             contract (whether or not cost or pricing data
             were initially required) when the modification
             involves a price adjustment expected to exceed
             $100,000.  (For example, a $30,000 modification
             resulting from a reduction of $70,000 and an
             increase of $40,000 is a pricing adjustment
             exceeding $100,000.) This requirement does not •
             apply when unrelated and separately priced
             changes for which costs or pricing data would
             not otherwise be required are included for
             administrative convenience in the same
             modification.

      (iii)  The award of a subcontract at any tier, if the
             contractor and each higher tier subcontractor
             have been required to furnish certified cost or
             pricing data, when the subcontract is expected
             to exceed $100,000.

       (iv)  The modification of any subcontract covered by
             subdivision (iii) above, when the price adjust-
             ment (see subdivision (ii) above) is expected
             to exceed $100,000.
                              II-4

-------
Is certified cost or pricing data required for actions over
$25,000 and not in excess of $100,000?  [FAR 15.804-2]
   (2)  If cost or pricing data are needed for pricing
        action over $25,000 and not in excess of $100,000,
        certified cost or pricing data may be obtained.
        There should be relatively few instances where
        certified cost or pricing data and inclusion of
        defective pricing clauses would be justified in
        awards between $25,000 and $100,000.   The amount of
        data required to be submitted should  be limited to
        that data necessary to allow the contracting officer
        to determine the reasonableness of the price.   When-
        ever certified costs or pricing data  are required
        for pricing actions of $100,000 or less, the contract-
        ing officer shall document the file to justify the
        requirement.  When awarding a contract of $25,000 or
        less, the contracting officer shall not require
        certified cost or pricing data.

        (b)  When certified cost or pricing data are
             required, the contracting officer shall require
             the contractor or prospective contractor to
             submit to the contracting officer (and to have
             any subcontractor or prospective subcontractor
             submit to the prime contractor or appropriate
             subcontractor tier) the following in support of
             any proposal:

             (1)   The cost or pricing data.

             (2)   A certificate of current cost or pricing
                  data,  in the format specified in 15.804-4,
                  certifying that to the best of its knowledge
                  and belief, the cost or pricing data were
                  accurate, complete, and current as of the
                  date of final agreement on  price.
                             II-5

-------
 Certificate of Current Cost or Pricing Data [FAR 15.804-4]     ^^

 (a)   When certified cost or pricing data are required
 under 15.804-2,  the contracting officer shall require the
 contractor to execute  a Certificate of Current Cost pf
 Pricing Data, shown below,  and shall include the executed
 certificate in the contract file.   The certificate states
 that the cost or pricing data are  accurate, complete, and
 current as of the date the  contractor and the Government
 agreed on a price.  Only one certificate shall he required;
 .the  contractor shall submit it as  soon as practical after
 price agreement is reached.


          CERTIFICATE OF CURRENT COST OR PRICING DATA


      This is to certify that, to the best of my knowledge and
 belief, the cost or pricing data (as defined in section
 15.801 of the Federal  Acquisition  Regulation (FAR) and
 required under FAR subsection 15.804-2 to the contracting
 officer or to the contracting officer's representative in
 support of ... ........... *  are accurate, complete, and current
 as of .......... **  This certification includes the cost of
 pricing data supporting any advance agreements and forward
 pricing rate agreements between the offeror and the Government
 that are part of the proposal.
 Firm

 Name

 Title

 nate of exec ut ion* *.*.
  * Identify the proposal,  quotation,  request for price
    adjustment,  or other submission involved, giving the
    appropriate identifying number (e.g.,  RFP No.).

 ** Insert the day, month,  and year when price negotiations
    were concluded and price agreement was reached.
***
    Insert the day,  month,  and year of signing,  which should
    be as close as practicable to the date when the price
    negotiations were concluded and the contract price was
    agreed to.

                      (End  of Certificate)
                          II-6

-------
why is the certificate of current cost and pricing required?


The certificate is required so that if the cost and pricing
data is subsequently found to be inaccurate, incomplete, or
noncurrent as of the effective date of the certificate, the
Government is entitled to an adjustment of the negotiated
price.
Is a certificate of current cost and pricing data an acceptable
substitute for current cost and pricing data?
No.  A certificate of cost or pricing data is not a substitute
for examining and analyzing the contractor's proposal.
Are there exemptions from or waiver of submission of certified
cost or pricing data?  [FAR 15.R04-3]
     (a)  General.  Except as provided in paragraphs (b)  and
          (c) below,  the contracting officer shall not require
          submission or certification of cost or pricing
          data when the contracting officer determines that
          prices are:

          (1)  Rased on adequate price competition (see
               paragraph (b)  below);

         •(2)  Based on established catalog or market prices
               of commercial  items sold in substantial
               quantities to  the general public (see
               paragraph (c)  below); or
          (3)   Set by law or regulation
               below) .
(see paragraph  (d)
                         II-7

-------
What is adequate price competition?  [FAR 15.804-3(5)1

Adequate price competition.

     (1)  Price competition exists if

          (i)  Offers are solicited;

         (ii)  Two or more responsible offerers that
               can satisfy the Government's requirements
               submit priced offers responsive to the
               solicitation's expressed requirement; and

        (iii)  These offerers compete independently for
               a contract to be awarded to the responsible
               offerer submitting the lowest evaluated
               price.

     (2)  If price competition exists, the contracting
          officer shall presume that it is adequate unless

          (i)  The solicitation is made under conditions
               that unreasonably deny to one or more
               known and qualified offerers an opportunity
               to compete;

         (ii)  The low offerer has such a decided advantage
               that it is practically immune from
               competition; or

        (iii)  There is a finding, supported by a statement
               of the facts and approved at a level above
               the contracting officer, that the lowest
               price is unreasonable.

     (3)  A price is "based on" adequate price competition
          if it results directly from price competition or
          if price analysis alone clearly demonstrates that
          the proposed price is reasonable in comparison
          with current or recent prices for the same or
          substantially the same items purchas'ed in
          comparable quantitities, terms, and conditions
          under contracts that resulted from adequate
          price competition.
I)
                         II-8

-------
Howcan you determine if a price is based on an established
catalog or market price?  FAR 15.804-3(c)}
Established catalog or market prices.  A proposal is exempt
from the requirement 'for submission of certified cost or
pricing data if the prices are, or are based on, established
catalog or established market prices of commercial items
sold in substantial quantities to the general public.  In
order to quality for this exemption,  the terms of the proposed
purchase,  such as quantity and delivery requirements, should .
be sufficiently similar to those of the commercial sales
that the catalog or market price will be fair and reasonable.

     (1)  "Established catalog prices" must be recorded
          in a form regularly maintained by the
          manufacturer or vendor.  This form may be a
          catalog,  price list, schedule, or other
          verifiable and established record.  The record
          must (i)  be published or otherwise available
          for customer inspection and (ii)  state current
          or last sales price to a significant number of
          buyers constituting the general public {see
          subparagraph (5) below).

     (2)  "Established market prices" are current prices
          that (i)  are in the course of ordinary and
          usual trade between buyers and sellers free
          to bargain and (ii) can be substantiated by
          data from sources independent of the manufacturer
          or vendor.

     (3)  "Commercial items"  are supplies or services
          regularly used for  other than Government purposes
          and sold  or traded  to the general public in
          the course or normal business operations.

     (4)  An item is "sold in substantial quantitites"
          only when the quantities regularly sold are
          sufficient to constitute a real commercial
          market.   Nominal quantities,  such as models,
          samples,  prototypes, or experimental units, do
          not meet  this requirement.   For services to be
          sold in substantial quantities,  they must  be.
          customarily provided by the offerer,  using
          personnel regularly employed and  equipment (if
          any is necessary) regularly maintained solely or
          principally to provide the  services.
                          II-9

-------
(5)   The "general public" is a significant number of
     buyers  other than the Government or affiliates
     of the  offerer;  the item involved must not be
     for Government end use.  For the purpose of this
     subsection 15.804-3, items acquired for
     "Government end use" include items acquired for
     foreign military sales.

(6)   A price is "based on" a catalog or market price
     only if the item being purchased is sufficiently
     similar to the catalog or market priced
     commercial item to ensure that any difference
     in prices can be identified and justified
     without resorting to cost analysis.

(7)   If an item is substantially similar to a
     commercial item for which there is an established
     catalog or market price at which substantial
     quantities are sold to the general public, but
     the price proposed is not based on this catalog
     or market price (see subparagraph (6) above), the
     contracting officer may, if doing so will result
    , in a fair and reasonable price, limit any
     requirement for costs or pricing data to those
     data that pertain to the differences between the
     items.   When the difference between the catalog
     or market price of an item or items and the
     proposed total contract price is $100,000 or
     more, the contracting officer shall require
     submission of certified cost or pricing data to
     identify and justify that difference unless an
     exemption or waiver is granted.

(8)   Even though there is an established catalog or
     market  price of commercial items sold in
     substantial quantities to the general public,
     the contracting officer may require costs or
     pricing data if (i) • the contracting officer
     makes a written finding that the price is not
     reasonable, including the facts upon which the
     finding is based, and (ii) the finding is
     approved at a level above the contracting
     officer.
                       11-10

-------
How do you receive an exemption?  FAR 15.804-3(e)1
Claiming and granting exemption.  To receive an exemption
under paragraph (c) or (d) above, the offeror must ordinarily
claim it on standard Form 1412, Claim for Exemption from
Submission of Certified Cost or Pricing Data, when the total
proposed amount exceeds $100,000 and more than one catalog
item for which an exemption is claimed exceeds $25,000.  When
an exemption is claimed for more than one item in a proposal,
a separate SF 1412 is equired for each such item exceeding
$25,000 except as otherwise provided in the solicitation.
The contracting officer may grant an exemption and need not
require the submission of SF 1412 when

     (1)  The Government has acted favorably on an
          exemption claim for the same item or similar
          items within the past year.  In that case,
        .  except as otherwise directed by the contracting
          officer, the offeror may furnish a copy of
          the prior claim and related Government action.
          The offeror must also submit a statement to
          the effect that to its knowledge since the
          prior submission, except as expressly set
          forth in the statement, there have been no
          changes in the catalog price or discounts,
          volume of actual sales, or the ratio of sales
          for Government end use to sales in other
          categories which would cause a cumulative
          change in price exceeding 525,000?

     (2>  Special arrangements for the submission of
          exemption claims have been made in anticipa-
          tion of repetitive acquisitions of catalog
          items?

     (3)  There is evidence, before solicitation, that
          the item has an acceptable established catalog
          or market price or a price set by law or
          regulation.   Evidence may include (i) recent
          submissions by offerers or (ii) the contract
          officer's knowledge or market conditions,
          prevailing prices, or sources.
                            11-11

-------
I
             53J01-U12
FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATION -TAR)
• 	 ' 	 	 ^
CLAIM FOB EXEMPTION FROM SUBMISSION OF CERTIFIED COST OR PRICING DATA j X90-0m
i. OF 7CROO f?»*M. etaim iff CaOfi
1. blvlSiOniil A»O kOCATlON(S) WMCRC MO«K U TO at PCRFOaMED
J. &wL.iCI ' ATlON NO.
4. ITEM O* Su^'-ieS A'-S.'JO iŁ • viCEi TO SE * JBNI$«C-
*
Bv •ufimman of IPrt form •** of1*«Or claims «««r»*OTion from r«Qo>rarvi«na for mjentinino carv1^ I^f. ,> pricing Qau on me 3«s-l T*UT ^C >-O» C*fen«J >s
DM«d on in *n»Diiirvad :aaiog v martat onoa c' t »nv»»rcni iT*m eta in tuomn;*! au*r.M^« — 9w prwii 9>^<>c sr a i 7 ce •'. 3v >«t» X 'tga:t-,af.
(•• CAR 15 6O*-4I. Compivti Section I. n.or ill D»O«I « •ooliesaa.
SECTION 1- CATALOG PRICE tSvt tn,truct,on, fo> in~!•"* ••  n oititoa Brioi to avruni public
e. Otror »!•» 10 owwril Bublic
» _

SALES CATEGORY
•• D • DC
* O DC
«. D8 DC

ANQ A^^t.lCAfti.C DISCOUNTS.
t. SALU »C«IOO CCvCACO
FROM TO
10. REMARKS
*u*t and «xA4«fji M* k«rt* ^f Jc M Jten« 10. XXJf AJtŁS. ConttMMtf an «
11. LIST THREE SALES OF THE ITEV OFFERED
OATE



NO. OF UNITS SOLO PRICE/UNIT
4
, T
s
SECTION II - MARKET PRICE ISm Initnxnon, for itm 12 Of n>**rm.)

HCTION III - LAW OR REGULATION tS** Inrtrufttoni tor itwn 13 art imrm.)
	 •
REPRESENTTATION IM~ Siurrucneti fart*-, Ua«™~-~.l
fvquinvnvna 1or •jDmjRing o>rlifi«d CD«T or ariCJ<*9 O*tt T>^« orivror «lio niontotnu tfwt. fxC«Ct t» fund in an inKfT-wtt, • lik« c» a«t» o*
final o«yr™ni uno« i contntn malting from ir.t oroocml. tf« Conncting OMicc or any otnar •uittorixts amelor** o* ff» Uniod Sa»i Gowrunani «
rmma team n boots, nKcrd. aocumviti. «m orr» luooornng tfaa sfwt wilt Dtrmit wtionion of Vx ciaim.
J«. TVP€3 )««AMŁ. TITi_Ł. AniO ^iRh«
1*11-101
is. SIGNATURE i&. OATC o^ suBfjssiQM
1
(TAMOARO FORM 141: ue-*3i I
••VtflMO Dr CSA
PAB [*• Cf 0) S3 Jll-KOI
- - -
             J3-1O*

-------
PART 53—FORMS
                                              53.301-1412
                                     INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS SUBMITTING
                                     CLAIM FOR EXEMPTION FRCfv SUBMISSION
                                       OF CERTIFIED COST OR PRICING DATA
    Item 7. Attach a copy of trie catalog, or the appropriate
    pages covering price and published discounts, or a nate-
    ment that the cataiog is on file in the buying office to
    which  this proposal is  being  made. Catalog price, is a
    price that is included  in a catalog,  price list, schedule, or
    other form that is regularly maintained by  ih; .i.e. ._lac-
    turer or vender, is eimer published or otherwise available
    for  inspection by customers,  and states prices at which
    sales are  currently, or were  last, made to a significant
    number of  buyers constituting  the general public.  To
    justify a  catalog  price exemption for the Government
    item, the catalog  item must be identical or must  be so
    similar in material and design  that any price difference or
    its absence can be evaluated soiefy  by price analysis (see
    FAR  15.805-2). In the latter case, a statement must be
    attached identifying the specific differences and explain-
    ing,  by price analysis of the differences, how the pro-
    posed price is derived from the catalog price.

    Item 8. This period should include the most recent regu-
    lar monthly, quarterly,  or other period for which sales
    data  are  reasonably available and should extend  back
    only far enough to provide a  total period representative
    of average sates. You may also attach sales data  for a
    prior representative period if for any reason recent sales
    are abnormal and  the prior period is sufficiently recent
    (not  more than 2 years preceding) to  support the pro-
    posed price for the Government item. .In the latter case,
    you  must explain,  by price analysis only, how the pro-
    posed price is derived from the catalog sales for the prior
    period. '

   Item 9. (a) Include in Category A all sales of the  catalog
   item  (a) directly to the U.S. Government and its instru-
   mentalities and  (b) for U.S. Government use (sales
   directly to U.S.  Government prime contractors,_or their
   subcontractors or suppliers at any tier, for use as  an end
   item,  or as part of an end item, by the U.S. Government).

   (b) Include in Category B all sales of  the catalog  item
   made strictly at the catalog price, less onty published dis-
   counts, to the general  public (i.e., catalog price  sales
   Other than those (i) to affiliates of the OffertM ot li'O  in-
   cluded in Category A (instruction 9(a)J.

   (c) Include in Category C all sales to the general public
   that were  not mad* strictly at the catalog puce or that
   w«re made at special discounts or discount rates not pub-
   lished in the catalog.
   Item 11.  On line a. insert information on the lowest price
   •t which  Category B or  C saies of the offered  item was
   made during the period, regardless of quantity.
        On lines b. and c. insert saies information in f>«
        fo!'owing manner.

        a.  Give  the  lowest  price  Category  C sales of
           comparac's quam>t:-es. if  tr.sre were no sates
          of comparaoie quantities, then give •

        b. The lowest price  Category C sales of quanti-
          ties  most  nearly  me  quantity oeing offered.
           If there were  no  sales  of Category C, then
          give

        c. The lowest price Category  B sales  of com-
          parable quantities. If  in   e were no sales o<
          comparable quantities, then give

        d. The lowest price  Category B sales of quanti-
          ties most nearly the quantity being offered.

        Attach a complete exolanation (!) if you, dur-
        ing   the  period covered,  offered  special  dis-
        counts not included  in the catalog, or (ii)  if the
        price proposed  is not the lowest price at which
        a  sale  was made to any customer during that
        period  for like items and  comparable  quanti-
        ties.

 Item 12. Market price is a current price, established in the
 usual and  ordinary course of trade  between  buyers and
 sellers  free to bargain,  that can be substantiated from
 sources independent of the  manufacturer  or  vendor.
 There must be a sufficient number of commercial buyers
 so that their purchases establish an ascertainable current
 market price for the item or service. The nature  of this
 market should  be described. To justify a market-price
 exemption, the item or service being purchased must be
 identical to'the commercial item or service or must be so ,
 similar  in  material and design (for supplies) or in work
 and facilities (for services) that any price difference or its
 absence can be evaluated solely by price  analysis  (see
 FAR 15.805-2). In the latter case, a statement must be
 attached identifying the specific  differences and explain-
 ing, by price analysis of the differences, how  the pro-
 posed price ts derived from the market price.

 Item 13. Identity the law  or regulation establishing the
 price offered.  If the price is controlled under taw by
 periodic ru'ings. reviews or  similar actions of a govern-
 mental  body, attach a copy of the controlling document.
 unless  it  was  previously submitted  to the contracting
 office.

 Item 14. tnsen the name, title,  and  firm of the person
authorized by the offerer to sign this form.
                                                                                     STAMOARO FONM 1412 BACK
                                                   11-13
                                                                                                               53-105

-------
What process is involved when an exemption isclaimed?
[FAR 15.8n4-3(f)1

Verification.

     (1)  When a prospective contractor requests
          exemption from submission of certified cost
          or pricing data,  the contracting officer
          shall ensure that applicable criteria in
          either paragraph (c) or (d) above,  as
          appropriate, are satisfied before issuing
          the exemptions.

     (2)  SF 1412 lists three categories of sales
          related to the established catalog  price of
          a commercial item sold in substantial
          quantities to the general public:

          A:  Sales to the U.S. Government or to
              contractors for U.S. Government use;

          B:  Sales at catalog price to the general
              public;  and

          C:  Sales to the general public at  other
              than catalog price.

          Although "substantial quantities" cannot be
          precisely defined (see subparagraph (c)(4)
          above),  the  following guidelines are provided
          for determining whether exemption claims
          submitted under the catalog price provision
          of SF 1412 meet the "substantial quantities"
          criterion:

          (i)  Sales to the general public are normally
               regarded as substantial if (a)  Category R
               and C sales are not negligible in themselves
               and comprise at least 55 percent of total
               sales of the item and (b)  Category P sales
               comprise at least 75 percent of the total
               of Category B and C sales.

          (ii)  Sales  to the general public are rarely.
                considered substantial enough to grant, an
                exemption if (a) Category R and C sales
                comprise less than 35 percent of total
                sales  of the item of (b)  Category R sales
                comprise less than 55 percent of the  total
                of Catagory B and C sales.
                          11-14

-------
     (iii)   When  percentages  fall  between  those  above,
            the contracting officer  should analyze  the
            individual  situation  in  order  to  determine
            whether  or  not an  exemption  is justified.

(3)   The contracting officer may  verify  or obtain
     verification (including audit or  contract
     administration  assistance) of the submitted
     data pertaining to catalog or market  prices or
     prices set by law  or regulation.  Access to the
     prospective  contractor's  records  is limited to
     access to the facts bearing  directly on  the
     exemption claimed.  It does  not extend to cost,
     profit, or other data relevant  solely to the
     reasonableness  of  the catalog or  proposed price.
                    11-15

-------
If an exemption is received,
[FAR 15.Rn4-3(M]
is price analysis required?
Price analysis

Even though an item qualifies for exemption from the
requirement for submission of certified cost or pricing
data, the contracting officer shall make a price analysis
to determine the reasonableness of the price and any need
for  further negotiation.  Unless information is available
from Government sources, it may be necessary to obtain
from the prospective contractor information such as that
regarding -

     (1)  The supplier's marketing system (i.e., use
          of jobbers, brokers, sales agencies, or
          distributors);

     (2)  The services normally provided commercial
          purchasers (e.g., engineering, financing,
          or advertising or promotion.

     (3)  Normal quantity per order? and

     (4)  Annual volume of sales to largest customers.


What circumstances canthe agency head waive the requirement
for  submission of certified cost or pricingdata?
[FAR 15.804-3(1)]
                                    0
The agency head (or, if the contract is with a foreign
government or agency, the head of the contracting activity)
may, in exceptional cases, waive the requirement of submission
of certified cost or pricing data.   The authorization for the
waiver and the reasons for granting it shall be in writing.
The agency head may delegate this authority.
                          11-16

-------
Who  is responsible  for assuring  that adequate cost and pricing
data  is  furnished?   [FAR  15.804-6]
Procedural Requirements

(a)  The contracting officer  shall  specify  (1) whether or
not cost or pricing data are  required,  (2)  whether or not
certification will be required,  (3) the extent of cost or
pricing data required if complete data are  not necessary, and
(4) the form (see paragraph (b)  below) in which the costs or
pricing data shall be submitted.  Even if the solicitation
does not so specify, however, the contracting officer is not
precluded from requesting such data if they are later found
necessary.

     (b)(l)  Cost or pricing  data shall be  submitted on
             Standard Form 1411  (SF 1411),  Contract Pricing
             Proposal Cover Sheet, unless required to be
             submitted on one of the termination forms
             specified in Suhpart 49.6 Data supporting
             forward pricing rate agreements or final
             indirect cost proposals shall  be submitted in
             a format acceptable to the contracting officer.

        (2)  Contract pricing proposals submitted on SF 1411
             with supporting  attachments shall be prepared
             to satisfy the instructions and appropriate
             format provided  in  the Federal Acquisition
             Regulations.
SF-1411 Contract Pricing Cover Sheet
of this guide.
is discussed in Part IV
                        11-17

-------
When  is the defective pricing clause required?  [FAR  15.804-8]
Contract clauses.

(a)  Price Reduction  for Defective Cost or Pricing Data.  The
contracting officer shallf when contracting by negotiation,
insert  the clause at  52.215-22, Price Reduction  for Defective
Cost or Pricing Data, in solicitations and contracts when it
is contemplated that  cost or pricing data will be required
(.see 15.804-2) .

.(b)  Price Reduction  for Defective Cost or Pricing Data-
Modifications.  The contracting officer shall, when contract-
ing by  negotiation, insert the clause at 52.215-23, Price
Reduction for  Defective Cost or Pricing Data-Modifications,
in solicitations and  contracts when  (1) it is contemplated
that cost or pricing  data will be required (see  15.804-2) for
the pricing of contract modifications, and (2) the clause
prescribed in  paragraph (a) above has not been included.

(c)  Subcontractor Cost or Pricing Data.  The contracting
officer shall  insert  the clause at 52.215-24, Subcontractor
Cost or Pricing Data, in solicitations and contracts when the
clause  prescribed in  paragraph (a) above is included.

(d)  Subcontractor Cost or Pricing Data-Modifications.  The
contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.215-25,
Subcontractor  Cost or Pricing Data-Modifications, in
solicitations  and contracts when the clause prescribed in
paragraph (b)  above is included.


What are the responsibilities of the contracting officer in
the pricing decision? [FAR 15.805]
                                                                   i)
Proposal Analysis

(a)  The contracting officer, exercising  sole responsibility
for the  final pricing decision,  shall, as appropriate,
coordinate a team of experts and request and evaluate the
advise of specialists in such fields as contracting,  finance,
law, contract audit, packaging, quality control, engineering
traffic management, and contract pricing.  The contracting
officer  should have appropriate  specialists attend the
negotiations when complex problems involving significant
matters will be addressed.  The contracting officer may
assign responsibility to a negotiator or price analyst for
(1) determining the extent of specialists' advice needed
and evaluating that advice,  (2)  coordinating a team of
experts, (3) consolidating pricing data and developing a
prenegotiation objective (see 15.807), and  (4) conducting
negotiations.

                         11-18

-------
(b)  The contracting officer shall require prospective
contractors to perform (1) price analysis for all significant
proposed subcontracts and purchase orders and (2) cost
analysis when the prospective subcontractor is required to
submit cost or pricing data or the contractor is unable to
perform an adequate price analysis (see 15.806(a)).


Price Analysis

The contracting officer is responsible for selecting and
using whatever price analysis techniques will ensure a fair
and reasonable price.  One or more of the following techniques
may be useed to perform price analysis:

     (a)  Comparison of price quotations received in
          response to the solicitation.

     (b)  Comparison of prior quotations and contract
          prices with current quotations for the same
          or similar end items.

     (c)  Application of rough yardsticks (such as
          dollars per pound or per horsepower,  other
          units) to highlight significant inconsistencies
          that warrant additional pricing inquiry.

     (d)  Comparison with competitive published price
          list, published market prices of commodities,
          similar indexes, and discount or rebate
          arrangements.

     (e)  Comparison of proposed prices with independent
          Government cost estimates (see 15.803(b)).
Cost Analysis

The contracting officer shall,  as appropriate,  use the
techniques and procedures outlined in paragraphs (a)  through
(f) below to perform cost analysis:

     (a)  Verification of cost  or pricing data  and
          evaluation  of cost elements,  including:

          (1)  The necessity for and reasonableness
               of proposed costs, including allowances
               for contingencies?

          {2}  Projection of the offerer's costs trends,
               on the basis of  current and historical
               cost or pricing  data;

                          11-19

-------
r

                         (3)  A  technical appraisal of the estimated
                             labor, material tooling, and facilities
                             requirements  and of  the reasonableness
                             of scrap and  spoilage factors; and

                         (4)  The application of audited or negotiated
                             indirect cost rates  {see Subpart 42.7),
                             labor rates,  and cost of money or other
                             factors.

                    (b)   Evaluating the  effect of  the offerer's current
                         practices on  future costs.  In conducting this
                         evaluation, the contracting officer shall
                         ensure  that the effects of inefficient or
                         uneconomical  past  practices are not projected
                         into the future.   In pricing production of
                         recently developed, complex equipment, the
                         contracting officer should make a trend analysis
                         of basic labor  and materials even in periods of
                         relative stability.

                    (c)   Comparison of costs proposed by the offerer  for
                         individual cost elements  with:

                         (1)  Actual costs  previously incurred by  the
                             same offerer;

                         (2)  Previous costs estimates  from the offerer
                            • or from  other offerers  for the same or
                             similar  items;

                         (3)  Other cost estimates received in response
                             to the Government's  request;

                         (4)  Independent Government cost estimates by
                             technical  personnel; and

                         (5)  Forecasts  of  planned expenditures.

                    (d)   Verification  that  the offerer's costs submissions
                         are in  accordance  with the contract cost principles
                         and procedures  in  Part 31 and, when applicable,
                         the requirements and procedures in Part 30, Cost
                         Accounting Standards.

                    (e)   Review  to determine whether any costs or pricing
                         data necessary  to  make the contractor's proposal
                         accurate, complete, and current have not been
                                        11-20

-------
          either submitted or identified in writing by the
          contractor.  If there are such data,  the
          contracting officer shall attempt to obtain them
          and negotiate,  using them or making satisfactory
          allowance for the incomplete data.

     (f)  Analysis of the results of any make-or-buy program
          reviews,  in evaluating subcontract costs.
Technical Analysis.

When cost or pricing data are required,  the contracting
officer should generally request a technical analysis of
proposals, asking that requirements,  logistics, or other
appropriate qualified personnel review and assess, as a
minimum:

     (a)  The quantities and kinds of material proposed;

     (b)  The need for the number and kinds of labor hours
          and the labor mix;

     (c)  The special tooling and facilities proposed;

     (d)  The reasonableness of proposed scrap and spoilage
          factors; and

     (e)  Any other data that may be pertinent to the cost
          or price analysis.
When is audit required?  [FAR 15.805-51
Field pricing support.

     (a)  (1)  when cost or pricing data are required,
               contracting officers shall request a field
               pricing report (which may include an audit
               review by the cognizant contract audit
               activity) before negotiating any contract
               or modification resulting from a proposal
               in excess of $500,000 except as otherwise
               authorized under agency procedures,  unless
               information available to the contracting
               officer is considered adequate to determine
               the reasonableness of the proposed cost  or
               price.  When available data are considered
               adequate for a reasonableness determination,
               the contracting officer shall document the
               contract file to reflect the basis of the
               determ nation.
                          II-21

-------
     (b)
(2)  Field pricing reports are intended to give
     the contracting officer a detailed analysis
     of the proposal, for use in contract
     negotiations.  Field pricing support personnel
     include,  but are not limited to,  administra-
     tive contracting officers,  contract auditors,
     price analysts, quality assurance personnel,
     engineers,  and small business and legal
     specialists.

Contracting officers should not request field pricing
support for proposed contracts or modifications of
an amount less than that specified in subparagraph
(a)(l) above.   An exception may be made when a
reasonable pricing result cannot be established,
because of (1) lack of knowledge of the particular
contractor, (2)  sensitive conditions,  or (3) an
inability to evaluate the price reasonableness
through price analysis or cost analysis of existing
data.
when is the audit clause required in the contract?
[FAR 15.106-21
The following audit clause shall be included in all negotiated
contracts, except small purchases.
Audit-Negotiation clause

     (a)  This subsection implements 10 U.S.C. 2313 (a),
          41 U.S.C. 254(b),  and 10 U.S.C. 2306(f).

     (b)  The contracting officer shall, when contracting
          by negotiation, insert the clause at 52.215-2,
          Audit-Negotiation, in solicitations and contracts,
          unless the acquisition is a small purchase under
          Part 13.  In facilities contracts, the contract
          officer shall use the clause with its Alternate 1.
                          11-22

-------
Audit-Negotiation clause

As prescribed in I5.106-2(b), when contracting by negotiation,
insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts/
unless the acquisition is a small purchase under Part 13.

               Audit-Negotiation {APR 1984)
     (a)  Examination of costs.  If this is a cost-
          reimbursement/ incentive, time-and-materials,
          labor-hour, or price-redeterminable contract, or
          any combination of these, the Contractor shall
          maintain and the contracting officer or represent-
          atives of the contracting officer shall have the
          right to examine and audit books, records, docu-
          ments, and other evidence and accounting procedures
          and practices, sufficient to reflect properly all
          costs claimed to have been incurred or anticipated
          to be incurred in performing this contract.   This
          right of examination shall include inspection at
          all reasonable times of the contractor's plants,
          or parts of them, engaged in performing the  contract

     (b)  Cost or pricing data.  If, pursuant to law,  the
          contractor has been required to submit cost  or
          pricing data in connection with pricing this
          contract or any modification of this contract,
          the contracting officer or representatives of the
          contracting officer who are employees of the
          Government shall have the right to examine and
          audit all books, records, documents, and other
          data of the contractor (including computations
          and projections) related to negotiating, pricing,
          or performing the contract or modification,  in
          order to evaluate the accuracy, completeness,  and
          currency of the costs or pricing data.   The  right
          of examination shall extend to all documents
          necessary to permit adequate evaluation of the cost
          or pricing data submitted, along with the compu-
          tations and projections used.

     (c)  Reports.   If the contractor is required to furnish
          cost, funding, or performance reports,  the contract-
          ing officer or representatives of the contracting
          officer who are employees of the Government  shall
          have the right to examine and audit books, records,
          other documents, and supporting materials, for the
          purpose of evaluating (1)  the effectiveness  of the
          contractor's policies and procedures to produce
          data compatible with the objectives of  these reports
          and (2)  the data reported.
                           11-23

-------
(d)   Availability.   The contractor shall make available  at
     its office at  all reasonable times the materials
     described in paragraphs (a)  and (b) above,  for
     examination, audit,  or  reproduction,  until  3  years
     after final payment under  this contract, or for  any
     shorter  period specified  in  Subpart 4.7, Contractor
     Records  Retention, of the  Federal Acquisition
     Regulation, or for any longer period required by
     statute  or by  other clauses  of this contract.  In
     addition:
     (1)
     !2)
If this contract is completely or partially
terminated, the records relating to the
work terminated shall be made available for
3 years after any resulting final termination
settlement; and

Records relating to appeals under the Disputes
clause or to litigation or the settlement
claims arising under or relating
contract shall be made available
appeals, litigation, or claims are disposed
of.
                                                    of
                                           to this
                                           until such
(e)   The Contractor shall insert a clause containing all
     the terms of this clause,  including this paragraph
     (e),  in all subcontracts over 510,000 under this
     contract, altering the clause only as necessary to
     identify properly the contracting parties and the
     contracting officer under  the Government prime
     contract.

                 (End of Clause)
                    11-24

-------
What  is  EPA's policy with respect to cost and price analysis?


It  is the intent of the Environmental Protection Agency
to  utilize cost or price analysis to the maximum extent
practicable prior to the negotiation of contracts and, when
necessary supplement the analysis with audits of contractor's
records  and procedures.


Who performs cost and price analysis at EPA?
The FAR  [15,608] states that the contracting officer
shall use cost or price analysis and shall document the
cost and price evaluation.  FAR 15.804-3 (a)-(d) sets forth
the exemption from cost or pricing data.

     (1)  adequate price competition
     (2)  established catalog or market price of
          commerical items
     (3)  prices set by law or regulation

The EPA Acquisition Handbook states:

     On procurements of $500,000 or less, the
     Contracting Officer may perform his/her
     own cost or price analysis.  if the action
     is over $500,000, the contracting officer
     will forward the proposals to the local cost
     advisory operations.   The cost advisory
     operations will either request audits on the
     proposals, perform an appropriate audit, or
     recommend to the contracting officer that
     he/she waive audit because adequate data is
     available through other means to perform a
     detailed analysis in-house.
In EPA, contracting officers and contract specialists can
obtain cost advisory services from the Cost Advisory Section,
For a detailed explanation of the cost advisory function,
refer to Section III of this guide.
                           11-25

-------
Who provides field audit services for EPA?
Field audit services are provided primarily by the
Defense Contract Audit Agency, and the Department of Health
and Human Services.  EPA has an Interagency Agreement whereby
the reimburseable costs of these services are charged against
the budget of the EPA Office of the Inspector General.

To control and coordinate these services, all requests
for field audit services must be coordinated through one of
the EPA Cost Advisory Offices.  Contracting officers and
contract specialists are not authorized to request audits.
A telephone verification of labor rates and indirect cost -
rates is .not considered a field audit in this context.  The
EPA Cost Advisory Offices are located at the principal
contracting offices in Washington,  D.C., Research Triangle
Park, NC and Cincinnati, OH.
                          11-26

-------
            the requirement that a copy of the postnectotiation summary tie
  provided to the cost advisory group bv the contract specialist.

  As required by FPR 15.808(b), P&CMD acquisition Handbook Units 3  {EAR.
  6) and 4 (PAR.  4), please furnish the Cost Advisory Section with  a copy
  of the Summary of  Negotiations after contract  award.  Please advise us
  if no award is made.
_ Prenegotiation Plan/Summary.

„ The summary shall address the planned disposition of all questioned and
_ set-aside costs resulting from an audit.   The Chief of the Contracting
  Office may issue procedures that do not require a formal prenegotiation
  plan.   The procedures shall require at a minimum  that the Contract
  Specialists discuss all significant objectives with the Contracting
  Officer or applicable Branch Chief or Section Head prior to  initiating
  negotiations.
  Postneqotiation Summary.	

  At the conclusion of each negotiation,  the Contract  Specialist shall
 „promptly prepare a summary of the principle elements of the negotiation,
 .using the Postnegotiation summary format (Attachment).  The summary
  shall address the disposition of all questioned and  set-aside costs
  resulting from an audit.   The memorandum shall  be  included in the
  contract file.
  Distribution.

  The Contract Specialist shall provide the Cost Advisory Group with a
  copy of the postnegotiation summary for each offerer who was  audited.
  After completion of the negotiations, the Cost Advisory Group shall
  distribute a. copy of the postnegotiation summary to both the  EPA Audit
  Division and the office performing the audit.  The Cost Advisory Group
  shall provide the Contracting Officer with a record of  the transmittal
  for insertion into the official contract file.  (See Exhibit B)
                                  II  - 27
  (Revised 8/90)

-------
 1.

 2.

 3.

 4.

 5.



 6.
                                                   Attachment
                                                   Page 1 of 3
                        POSTNEGOTIJVriCN SUMMARY
Name of Offeror:

HEP Number:  	
Date of Negotiation:  Opened:

Purpose of Negotiation:  	
Closed:
Name, position and organization of government employees
involved in negotiation:  	
Name, position and organization of contractor employees
involved in negotiation:  	
 7.    Status of contractor's purchasing system (if applicable):
 8.    Was certified cost or pricing data required?
 9.
10.
11.
12.
      If yes, date certified as accurate,  complete,  and current;
      if no, refer to attached waiver:   	
Was this data relied on in negotiating cost/price?
If not, why not?  	
Did members of Congress, other agencies or higher level
officials, not normally involved in the award and review process
have significant effect on this, action?  	
If yes, explain.  	

Basis for determining the profit or fee if different from the
prenegotiation objective:  	
Are subcontractors /consultants to be approved in the contract
document?  	  If yes, list subcontractors/consultants:
13.   Was subcontractor's certified cost or pricing data received (cite
      waiver if applicable):  	
14.   Best and Final Offer received?
15.
                                                   Date:
      Explain any variance from negotiated agreements:
Have all required representations and certifications been
completed?  	
                                 11-28

-------
16.
17.
                                                    Attachment
                                                    Page 2 of 3
Narrative:   (Include a discussion for each cost element where the
final agreed to cost element differs from the Government's
prenegotiation objective.  The discussion shall provide a thorough
rationale for arriving at the negotiated amount.)

Technical negotiations:  (Include a discussion of any technical
negotiations held.>
18.   Name of selected offerer:
SET.E1CTPT> OFFEBQR QMLY

19.   Is offerer debarred, ineligible or suspended?  	

20..   Has the Equal Bnployment Opportunity program been approved?  	

21.   Does the offerer meet the responsibility standards of FKR subpart
      9.1?  	;	

22.   Other information:  	
Prepared...by;

Signature:
                                              Date:
Signature:
                                              Date:
                                 11-29

-------
                                                   Attachment
                                                   page 3 of 3
                                        ABSTRACT
Offerer
A.   Base Period

     Cost Elenent
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
B.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.

D.

1.
2.
3.
                      Proposed    Objective    Negotiated
Narrative (may
be set forth
in footnotes)
     Subtotal
     Fee/Profit
     Total
     Option Period l

     Cost Element     Proposed
                                  Objective    Negotiated    Narrative
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
C.






Subtotal
Fee/Profit
Total
Option Period 2
     Cost Element     Proposed    Objective    Negotiated    Narrative
     Subtotal
     Fee/Profit
     Total
     Total {maximum contract - all actions)
     Total Est. Cost
     Fee/Profit
     Total Including
       Fee/Profit
 (NOTE:  a separate sheet is required for each offerer in the competitive
        range)
                                 11-30

-------
J""	"•'*
      5 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                       WASHINGTON. D.C. 20460
                                                        Exhr'.Mt
                                                      ADMINISTRATION
                                                      AND RESOURCES
                                                       MANAGEMENT
   MEMORANDUM


   DATE:      	

   SUBJECT:  Transmit!*! of the Postnegotiation  Summary
             Contractor:   '
             RFP ft:  	' " .   . , .	.
   FROM:



   TO:
Stephen 0. Leahy, Chief
Washington Cost Advisory Operations
                        *
             In accordance with the Acquisition Handbook,  (unit three-

   revised  10/24/88) Me  have sent  the  O16 a  copy of  the subject

   postnegotiation summary on 	. This memorandum should

   be  included  in  the  Official  Contract  File   as  a  record  of

   transmittal of the postnegotiation memorandum.
   CC: DIG
                   Audit Division
    (8^90)
               11-31

-------

-------
III.  EPA POST
                       & Tnvrnf BRANCH
       1.  Hie Function of EPA's Cost Review and Policy Branch
       2.  EPA's Policy on Cost and Price Analysis
       3.  How to Request Cost Analysis
       4.  Function of the Cost Advisory Offices
       5.  Sample Reports from the Cost Advisory Offices
           a.   Cost Advisory Report (CAR)
           b.   Preliminary Analytical Cost Evaluation Report (PACER)
           c.   Comments on RFP
       6.  Cost Advisory Operations Review Program and Index
       7.  Function of the Cost Policy and Rate Negotiation Section (CPRNS)
 The organization chart of the EPA Procurement and Contracts Management
 Division is illustrated as follows:
      It is the Cost Review and Policy Branch with provides cost and
      price analysis services to the Contracting Officer and
      Specialists; specifically, the Cost Advisory Section, (formerly
"     WCAO) and the Cost Policy and Rate Negotiation Section (CPRNS)
      in Washington, DC.   There are also Cost Advisory Offices in
      Cincinnati,  OH and Research Triangle Park, NC..
                                   Ill
 (Revised 8/90)

-------

-------
<\
o
CO  C
Ł  o

§:p
  O

  O
                  •o
                  CL

                  3

                  C/)
  O  ^
      Q
•E "Ł
      o

  c  E
  o  0

  E  a
  o  eg

  *"  CO
                                           (0
                                           o
                                          s o
                                          (0 (0

                                          II
                                          o
               c o
               0) OJ *-



             I III


               Q. 03

                                      s
                                           w
                                          38

                                          O. >
                                          HT3
                                          DC<
                             C CO

                             O C

                             E.2
                             0} *-
                = JS Q.
                o Ł Q.

                Q. ™ 3
C  (0
CO  C

>*  .2
O G) *••
-J i_
1*.

ll"
«c
3«








•••




^™^-
o z
O

is .2
*o w
c >•
8|
LL<

||
.f-o
e- rf
                        III-l

-------
what is
EPA's policy with respect to cost and price analysis?

                                 *                   fl
It is the intent of the Er.virorner.tal Protection Agency
to utilize cost or price analysis to the maximum extent
practicable prior to the negotiation of contracts and,  when
necessary to supplement the analysis with audits of
contractor's records and procedures.

The FAR  [15.608] states that the contracting officer shall
use cost or price analysis and shall document the cost  and
price evaluation.  FAR 15.R04-3 (a-d) sets forth the
exemptions from cost or pricing data.
     (1)  adequate price competition
     (2)  established catalog or market price-of commercial
          items
     (3)  prices set by law or regulation
The EPA Acquisition Handbook states:
     On procurements of 5500,000 or less, the
     Contracting Officer may perform his/her own cost
     or price analysis.  If the action is over 5500,000,
     the Contracting Officer will forward the proposals
     to the local cost advisory operations.  The costs
     advisory operations will either request audits on
     the proposals, perform an appropriate audit, or
     recommend to the Contracting Officer that he/she
     waive audit because adequate data is available
     through other means to perform a detailed analysis
     in-house.
                            III-2

-------
          How do I Teeniest a cost
-f
Complete a " Request for Cost Analysis" form and forward it to the
appropriate Cost Advisory Office along with the business proposal(s).

  -  A separate request should be completed for each of feror under the RFP.

The Contracting Officer should submit to the Cost Advisory Office along
with the necessary business proposals (including subcontractor information
sent directly to EFA under separate cover) the following information:

  -  A copy of the Request for Proposal (RFP)
  -  Technical Evaluation(s) (if available)
  -  Representations and Certifications
  -  General financial and organizational information
     (Prime contractor and subcontractor(s))

Each cost analysis request should include a listing of the associated
subcontractors proposed and their respective dollar amounts.

It is important that the requestor identify the type of report desired.
(i.e. PACER, Cost Analysis, etc.)

Any specific areas of concern or any special information or analysis
desired by the requestor must be clearly stated in the request.

On page III-4 is an example of the request form used by the Cost Advisory
Section in Washinton, B.C.  The Cost Advisory Offices in Cincinnati, OH
and Research Triangle Park, N.C. use a similar form.
                                            III-3
          (Revised 8/90)

-------

-------
&EPA
   UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PflOTECTION AGENCY
               WASHINGTON. DC 2046O
     REQUEST FOR COST ANALYSIS
TO:
     US Environmental Protection Agency
     Procurement & Contracts Management
      Division (PM-214)
     Planning & Cost Advisory Branch
     Washington. DC 20460
Contractor/Grantee
Subcontractor (Fill in if approprimf
Data of Proposal
Comract/RFP/Gram No.
Desired Data for Completed Report
Proposed Amount
 $
                                     Project Title
                                            I To Be Submitted (Fill in thu ypnpritU Modal
                   CONTRACTS/BBPS
                                         GRANTS
Type of Contract
                 Project Officer's Name
CheckOne
                ^^
                D
                  n,
                     Ftmtog Package Be
                     Uv.    DM.
                                                                                   If "Yes," For How Much?
The)
   D
   D
Cc;T.17
The Desired Oma Por Completed neaon Is Satisfactory Unices Ejajtoinari
CostAnatyst

-------
0

-------
     Effective immediately, all assist audits received by the Cost
Advisory Office from DCAA should be included as an attachment to
the Cost Advisory Report.  The OIG tracks all DCAA audit reports via
the Prime Audit Tracking System (FftTS).  The Cost Advisory Offices are
responsible for furnishing the OIG with a response which suntnarizes
cost question agreed to and not agreed to.  Normally, the summary of
negotiation is sufficient for this purpose.  In addition to responding
to the OIG, the Cost Advisory offices now must respond to EPA Management
with a report which summarizes what was reported to the OIG.
The attachments include both the instructions on reporting Audit
Resolutions and the form for summarizing data to be reported to EFA
tfenagement.  A copy of the instructions and a form for summarizing data
(one for each assist audit report from DCAA) should be included in all
the cost advisory reports which transmit a DCAA audit.  Refer to page
III-6, Attachment I.
                                 III-5
(8/90)

-------
                                                          Attachment I
                                                          page 1 of 2
         Instructions for Reporting the Resolution of Preaward Audits
         to the IG and EPA Management
     The attached audit report is being tracked in the OIG's audit tracking
system- for resolution of the recommendations in the report.

     Any audit resolved or reported on after October 1, 1989 will require:
 1} a response to the IG which details the resolution of each audit
recommendation, and 2) a report to EPA management that summarizes what was
reported to the IG.  Both pieces of information will flow through the
Washington cost Advisory Section to the DIG and to EPA management.

     If the audit is of an unsuccessful offerer, simply inform the Chief,
Washington Cost Advisory Section, who will take the steps necessary to inform
the IG to remove the audit from the tracking system.

     For successful offerers the Contracting officer must prepare an audit
response which summarizes questioned costs agreed with, and details-questioned
costs not agreed with.  A SON will be sufficient as a response only if it
details questioned costs not agreed with and provides the reasons for the
disagreement.  If the SON does not provide detail of the questioned costs not
agreed with, that additional information must be added for your response to
the IG.

     There may be instances where you may not be able to make a
dollar-for-dollar determination of an audit recommendation, whether or not you
agree.  For example, the proposal audited may be different than the proposal
from which you negotiate.  In these instances you should report that you
cannot compute a dollar amount agreed or disagreed with, but you must provide
a narrative explanation why you cannot compute the amount.

     Also attached is a form to use for reporting the EPA management portion
of the information.  This form merely summarizes the information that is given
in detail to the OIG.  Return this form along with your OIG response to Steve
Leahy, Chief, Washington Cost Advisory Operations.
Attachmen'.s
      (8/90)
                                    TTT_f;

-------
                                                                Attachment I
                                                                page 2 of 2
           FORM FOR SUMMARIZING DATA FOR MANAGEMENT AUDIT
             TRACKING SYSTEM DATA INPUT OPERATOR
Successful Offerer:
Contractor:

RFP:
Audit report No.
Questioned costs agreed with.
Questioned costs not agreed with.
Questioned costs which a dollar
for dollar determination of
agreement or disagreement
cannot be made. *
TOTAL (This anount should
reconcile to the total
anount questioned in the
Audit Report.)
* provide a narrative explanation of why a dollar for dollar determination
cannot be made.
Submit to Chief, Washington Cost Advisory Operations.

-------

-------
 What' are  some  of  the  functions  of  the  cost  advisory  offices?
  Ser>e  of  the  functions  are  to  provide:  •

       o  cost and/or  price  analysis  as  requested  ty
          the  cor.tractlng  officers, negotiators  and
          grant specialists;

       o  final audits on  EPA contracts  and grants;

       o  financial  systems  reviews of EPA contractors;

       c  conduct  purchasing  system reviews en EPA
          contractors;

       o  provide  accounting  and  financial assistance
          as requested;

       o  review and provide  written  comments on PFP's;

       o  assist in  the  quality, assurance  review performed
          by CPRNS;
              *
       o  at the request of  the contracting officer,
          assist in  negotiations;

       o  assist the contracting  officer in contract
          monitoring for contracts meeting the"
          threshold;
                                            *
       o  advise the Grant Adninistration  Division en cost
          and  price  issues. •
 What other  services  can  I  request  from  the  cost  advisory
 offices?
 Besides providing cost  analysis,  they  also perform
 preliminary analytical  cost  evaluation reports  (PACER's)
 and  reviews of  RFP's,

 Of course  the contracting officer may  request any  special
 analysis from the cost  advisory office.

 A brief explanation  and example of the types of reports
 discussed  above follow:
(^90)
                              III - 7

-------
   Cost: Advisory Report - The cost advisory  report  (see exampl
   is a detailed cost analysis of a specific contractor's
   proposal.

   Each significant line item of the contractor's proposal
   will be analyzed either by an EPA cost analyst or a contract
   auditor in the field.  These reports are  frequently used by
   contract specialists to formulate their prenegotiation plans
( 8/90)
                          III- 8

-------
Janaury  4,  1982

Cost Advisory Report - XYZ Corporation

John J.  Smith
Chief, Cost Advisory Operations

Procurement Branch B
Attention: Snow White

The results of our review of the subject contractor's proposal
dated June 30, 1981 are discussed below and summarized as
follows:
                                    WCAO Recommendations*
                    Contractor's
                      Propo sa1
                For
                Acceptance
               For Non-
               Acceptance
Estimated Costs
Fixed Fee
Total CPFF
S 3,885,930
    163,200
S 4,049,130
S 3,885,930
S  -0-
*We were not provided a copy of the technical evaluation.
Therefore, our recommendations are. qualified to the extent
that costs may be questioned as a result of the quality
and quantity of proposed direct costs.

Direct Costs

Direct labor hours, other travel and ODC's have been proposed
in accordance with instructions in the RFP.  However, XYZ
Corporation has not proposed any travel costs for trips to
Washington, DC.  The RFP stated tha-t---the contractor should
propose one (1), one person two-day, round trip to Washington
per each 2,000 man-hours of effort.

We have reviewed direct costs in detail and consider them
acceptable for pricing purposes.

Indirect Costs

The contractor's proposed and our recommended indirect expense
rates aree summarized as follows:

Period
Date of Award
Until Amended

Basis for Allocation
(a) Direct labor dollars
(b) Total costs excluding general and administrative expense
Cost Center
Overhead
G&A Expense
Type
Billing
Rilling
Rate
100.7%
23.3%
Base
(a)
(b)
(3/90)
                            III - 9

-------
Other Coniiieiits

The contractor's cost accounting system is considered adequate for the
accumulation and reporting of cost under Government contracts and its
billing procedures are reliable to permit provisional approval for
payment of its claims for reimbursement.  The contractor has the  •"
necessary financial capability to perform this contract.

•Die amounts shown above reflect our best estimate of what contract
performance should cost assuming reasonable economy and efficiency.

Upon- completion of Negotiation of the subject proposal please complete
the following form, copy provided on page III-ll, and return it
to the Cost Advisory Operations.

As required by FAR Part 15.808(b), P&CMD Acquisition Handbook Units 3
(PAR. 6) and 4 (PAR. 4), please furnish us a copy of the Summary of
Negotiations after contract award.  Please advise us if no award is
made.  Also, we invite your comments and suggestions on this report.
You may use the attached contracting officer response sheet for these
comments.

If you have any questions or if we can be of further assistance please
contact, Joe Smith on extension 382-2061
                                 111-10
(Revised 8/90)

-------
     Negotiation  Memorandum

     RFP  Number:      	
Contractor:
     Contract  Specialist^

     Procurement  Branch:
     John  J.  Smith
     Chief, Cost  Advisory  Operations
     Negotiations  on  the  subject  RFP  are  complete  and  a  contract
     has  been  awarded.   [The  subject  offerer was  not the
     successful  bidder  and  the  contract was  awarded to:
                                                              1
     The  subject  offerer  was  the  successful  offeror and  I  have -t
     attached  a copy  of  the  negotiation memorandum in accordance
     with FAR  15.808(b).]
(8^90)
                                 III- 11

-------
PACER (Preliminary Analytical Cost Evaluation Report)-The
PACER provides a comparison of the competing cost^^
proposals received on a competitive RFP.  it does not       ^m  j
provide a detailed cost analysis of each item of cost       ^^
proposed.

This type of report can be of particular assistance on
Level of Effort (LOE) contracts since  it will determine
whether offerors have proposed upon the requested basis
(i.e. labor mix, number of hours,  travel, ODC's).

This type of report can be of assistance on  all procure*
ments of a competitive nature since its detailed comparisons
of  the contractor's price by line  item can be a source
for interrogatories and may  assist in  the determination
of  the competitive range.

An  example of  a PACER on a level of effort contracting
arrangement  follows:
                        Ill- 12

-------
     Preliminary Analytical Cost Evaluation Report (PACER) on Proposals Submitted
     in Response to RFP WAS2-2000

     John J.  Smith
     Chief, Cost Advisory Operations

     Procurement Section  2
     Attention:  John Doe
     In response  to  your request, we have performed a preliminary evaluation of
     (9) nine offers received in response to the subject RFP.  The contractors'
     cost proposals, including the amounts contained in this report have not
     been subjected  to technical evaluation or cost analysis.  Specifically,  we
     express no opinion on the labor rates, indirect rates, travel or other
     direct costs at this time.  We have reviewed the proposals for arithmetical
     accuracy and compliance with the terms of the PFP and will provide cost
     advisory reports on each proposal when requested.  The prices proposed and
     the result of our review are discussed in detail in Exhibits A and R and
     are summarized  as follows:                            .   '
                             Amount
    Contractor       *       Proposed*

    Rlue, Inc.              8396,501
    White, Inc.             3390,694
    Ped Company             3501,398
    Green Associates        3345,300
    Yellow, Inc.            3409,235
    Lilac, Inc.             3400,825
    tVange Systems, Inc.    3391,977
    Aqua Associates         3465,038
    Peach, Inc.          .   3521,831

    (  ) Indicates Increase
         Amount per
          Review *

          3396,501
          3418,087
          3501,398 .
          3352,400
          3409,235
          3402,588
          3391,977
          3454,226
          3521,831
Pi f fererce

 S   0
(327,393)
 S   0
(S 7,100)
 S   0
(S I,7fi2)
 S   0
(310,812)
 S   0
    * Cost is inclusive of subcontractors' fees, but exclusive of prime
      contractors' fees.
(8/90)
III- 13

-------
Other Comments

We recommend that you incorporate the following comments  in your
interrogatories.


Blue, Inc.

Your proposal contained no escalation for consultants.  Do you have agreements
with the consultants to work at the current hourly rate Cor the entire period
of performance?


White Corporation

Although you stated in your cost proposal that you used 55,000 per 500 hours
of LOE for other direct charges as directed by the RFP, your soimary of
60 showed only 367,426.  The RFP specified amount of 55,000 per 500 hours
LOE is exclusive of any indirect burdens.  Please include the RFP specified
amounts in future proposals.                                           ;

You have proposed* Brown Company as a subcontractor.   Your proposal package
does not include any SF 1411's for Brown Company. Please have them submit
cost proposals for their allocated share of the base 6,000 hours, the 5000
hour increment for the optional hours and a summary  of their share of the
total 9,000 hours .LOE.

Your proposal contained no escalation for proposed consultants.  Co you
have agreements signed by consultants to work at  current  rates for the
entire period of performance?


Red Company

The RFP requires a summary proposal for the maximum  9,000 LOR hours.
Please have your proposed subcontractors submit summary SF 1411's for their
allocated shares of the maximum LOR hours.


Green Associates

Your proposal appears to be short fifty-four (54) hours for professional
level 4.  Please correct this error or explain the omission.  Please include
sufficient computations to show how you computed  your proposed hourly rates.

Your proposal shows Cambridge, MA as the place of performance.  Explain why
travel was priced from Vienna, Virginia.
                                          Ill - 14
(8/90)
                                                                                     !)

-------
     Your proposal contained no escalation for proposed consultants.  Do you
     have agreements signed by the consultants to work at current rates for
     the entire period of performance?

     You have proposed Whiteen & Soward as subcontractor.  We request a more
     detailed explanation of their proposed costs.  Specifically, what is the
    -overhead rate and what are they proposing for profit.  They should also
    "identify their proposed personnel with the PFP labor categories.
     Yellow, inc.

     Your proposed subcontractor, G. C. Johns has proposed Water Resources,
     Inc. as a subcontractor.  We request a ccnplete breakdown by cost elenent
     for Water Resources for their allocated share of the 6,000 hours LOE,
     500 hours increment and total 9,000 hours LOE.
     Lilac, Inc.

    ..Your proposed subcontractor, Associates, Inc. , should identify their
    proposed enployees with the RFP specified labor categories.

    -Since it is your ccnpany policy to direct charge indirect telephone costs,
          cost should be proposed in addition to the ODC specified in the RFP.
     Orange Systems, Inc.

     Your proposal contained no escalation for proposed consultants.  Do you
     •have agreements signed by the consultants to work at the current rates
     for the entire period of performance?


     Aqua Associates

     You list four consultants for professional level 4 in your technical
     proposal.  Explain why these consultants are not included in your cost
     proposal.

     We request that your proposed subcontractor, submit a summary SF 1411 of
     their allocated share of the 9,000 hours LOE.
     Peach, Inc.

     Your proposal contained no escalation for proposed consultants.  DD you
     have agreements signed by the consultants to work at current rates for
     the entire period of performance?
(8/90)

-------
    Your proposed subcontractor, Malooln Lord, Inc., has  incorrectly proposed
    his allocated hours for professional level 4 and technician level 3.
    You allocated him 148 hours for professional level  4  and  302 hours  for
    technician level 3.  He proposed 160 hours for  professional level 4 and
    290 for technician level 3.

(8/90)                                   III-  16

-------
  vo

< vu
JC
X
K:
          S|§

          C I-I N
          Ł H I
          i&i
          "" &. a.
C


5

.c .
fcg
(JJ t-.
ou
in
r-
o
01
CN
v>

*
ftj C
3 05
<<

W
C) P »
O 0 O
C JJ C
(0 W i-t
u >,
C cr.


o •

>

c y
8J C
e K
U 0]
C <



t
•s g
OS M




flj *
Jj ft.
•-* E7
S6

/•ii *
||



^C
cc
c
CN
tA
m
CN
CO

^
tn
^
X
CO
VC*
r~
CN

a\
c

in
CN
tn
CO
C
CN
CN
CO


"m
U3
U
c
JJ
o
Contra
Ł,
?
C
a
1


C


W
CN
rH
C


c
t*
cr-

CN.
. i— t


v>


c

to
cc




i2



o


CO



o

v>
e


v>


s °?
C *.'
•~ c
jj Q
^ Ł
N -D
"* S
*~^ w
(C •!— I
tn
p:
o
a.
CN
t/>
CN
r-
i-H
CC
CN
•— t
cr-
oc
i— i
ro
c

CN
C
CN


VC
cc^
c
CN
-
cc
CN
WJ-
a-
c
^*
in
VC
CN
W
CO
C
r-
CN
CN

»
jJ
S

"8
N

1
C
8
•k



O

5
c
c


c
c

crT



c
c
c


g
(^
oT



e


e^



c
c
c
Cft


1







W
u
3
O
S

1— 1
m
CN
m
«•


i
in
CN


CN
C
i-H
CN


CN
VC
CN
CN
V>


in
vc
CN
CN



i-H
f^._
^^
PO
to


^^
"*
CT>
CN
t/>
CN
CN
in
CN
CO


Jj
W
"S -c 5

U) •C >
III

- ^
°7
CN
ro
«>


a
CO
CN


CN
C
CN
tn


09
^
CN
CN
W


in
vc
CN
CN


CN
O"
^*
i-H
CO


^H
p*
c
co
CO


^^-
^
CN
CO
CN
CN
*
in
CN
CO




IE T
N Q
••— T3 2**
i— * 
-------
                                                                         Exhibit  A
                                                                         Page  2 of 6
       Explanatory Notes of Adjustments
       Blue,  Inc.
       The total direct labor hours  are  as per RFP specifications.   Professional level
       1 is three (3)  short of RFP specifications.   Technician level 3 is three  (3)
       hours over RFP  specifications.  The prime contractor and the subcontractors
       proposed a total of  900 hours for direct secretarial labor.   The prime
       contractor proposed  direct labor  escalation factors of approximately 3.2% for
       the base 6,000  hours and 7.61 for the 3rOOO option hours applied to current
       rates.  The proposed subcontractor, Associates,  Inc., proposed 3% escalation
       for the base 6,000 hours and  7.6% escalation for the option  3,000 hours applied
       to current rates. The proposed suhcon tractor,  (ABC) proposed direct labor
       escalation factors as follows:

                                  Base  6,000 hours

       Professional Levels  3 & 4 - 12% applied to current rates
       Professional Levels  2 & 1 - 7.3%  applied to current rates
                                                                              *
                                  Option 3,000 hours                          s'

       Professional Levels  3 & 4 - 16.7% applied to current rates
       Professional Levels  1 & 2 - 10,2% applied to current rates

       APC did not include  any names in  their cost proposal for proposed employees.
       Therefore, we could  not compare employees in the cost proposal with employees
       in the technical proposal.  The prime contractor and Associates utilized
       the same employees for cost and technical proposals.

       The prime contractor did not  propose any escalation for the  proposed
      .consultants.  Since  he proposed most of the consulting hours for the base
       LOE, we made no adjustment for  consultants.


       White Corporation

       The total direct labor hours  are  as per RFP specifications.   Professional
       level 1 is three (3) hours short  of RFP specifications.   Technician level 3
       is three (3)  hours over RFP specifications.   Direct labor escalation is
       based on 9.5% applied to a base rate as of the date that rate is effective
       through the midpoint period of  performance.   An  additional 720 hours for
       technical assistant  has been  proposed.
                                                                                     i)
(8/90)
                                          III- 18

-------
                                                                     Exhibit A
                                                                     Page 3 of 6
        The proposed subcontractor is Brown Company.  There are no SF 1411's for
        the subcontractor.  It appears that fully loaded hourly rates have been
        used for pricing the proposed cost for the subcontractor,  we cannot
        determine if any adjustment is required for the subcontractor.  There is
        no escalation proposed for the proposed consultants.  The sane proposed
        employees appeared in the cost and technical proposals.
        Red Cor^>any

        The total direct labor hours are as per RFP specifications.  Professional
        level 1 is three (3) over RFP specifications.  Technician level 3 is three
        (3) hours short of RFP specifications.  The prime contractor has proposed
        1,190 hours of direct secretarial labor.

        The direct labor escalation factors for the prime contractor are 16.05% for
        the base 6,000 hours and 32.09% for the option 3,000 hours.  This is based
        on the conpany's historical salary escalation of 10% per year.

        The direct labor escalation factor for the proposed subcontractor, Research
        Systems, Inc., ie based on a 10% increase effective January 1 of each year.
                                                                               *
        The direct labor escalation factor for the proposed subcontractor, Associates
        is based on increases of 7% each calendar year.

        The proposed employees are the sarne in both the cost and technical proposals.

        There are no surtnary SF 1411's for the subcontractors.


        Green Associates

        The contractor is short 54 hours for professional level 4.  Vte added the
        cost for these hours to the direct labor for the prime contractor.  The
        cost proposal states that a 7% escalation factor is used.  Since the sane
        hourly rates were used throughout the proposal, we could not determine if
        escalation is included.  Labor category rates were used to calculate the
        proposed costs.   Individuals were named in the technical proposal.

        There was no escalation proposed for the proposed consultants.
(8/90)
                                           III- 19

-------
                                                                       Exhibit A
            .  •                                                         Page  4 of 6


     The proposed subcontractor,  Mutt and  Jeff have proposed fully loaded  hourly IB '
     rates.   We  cannot  determine  the specific makeup of these rates and therefore
     cannot  determine if  any adjustments are required.   They included a copy of
     their "Usual Day Rates".  We could not determine how their labor categories
     correlated  with the  RFP labor categories.   There is a potential for under-
     statement for costs  due to the range  in cost per 8 hour day.

     There is no escalation proposed for the subcontractor.


     Yellow, Inc.

     The total hours proposed are as per RFP specifications.  Professional
     levels  2 and 1 and technician level 3 are proposed in accordance with RFP.
     Because the subcontractor proposed hours for consultants without identifying
     which RFP labor category they belonged to, we could not determine:the hours.
     proposed for professional levels 3 and 4.

     The direct  labor escalation  factor for both the prime and the subcontractor
     (and the subcontractor's consultants) is 5% for the optional 3,000 hours.*
                       •
     There were  no nanes  for proposed employees included in the cost proposal.-
     Therefore,  no comparison could be made with the technical proposal.


     Lilac,  Inc.

     The proposed direct  labor hours are in accordance with.RFP specifications.
     The prime contractor proposed an additional 1,020 hours for direct
     secretarial and administrative labor.

     Direct labor escalation for the prime contractor is a composite amount
     covering the three year period.  There was not sufficient information to
     allow us to determine the percentage of increase for each year. . They state
     in the proposal that it is 5% per annum.

     'Proposed subcontractor, Mee, Inc., escalated professional level 4 7.2% and
     professional level 3 1.8% for the optional 3,000 hours.  There was no
     escalation for professional level 2.

     Proposed subcontractor, Associates, Inc., proposed no escalation.
(8/90)

-------
*
                                                                          Exhibit A
                                                                          Page 5 of 6
        The prime contractor proposed category averages.  Mee, Inc., did not include
        any names in the cost proposal for proposed employees.  Associates, Inc.
        proposed the same employees in both the cost and technical proposals.
        Associates should identify the proposed employees with the RFP labor
        categories.

        The $1,259 adjustment is for Mee, Inc.  They proposed a 10% fee of estimated
        cost,  we limited the fee to 8.5% of estimated cost.
        •Orange Systems, Inc.

        The proposed direct labor hours are in accordance with RFP specifications.
        Proposed subcontractors, E. C., proposed 115 hours of direct secretarial
        labor.  The direct labor escalation for the prime contractor is based on
        a 6% increase for 1983 and a 5% increase for 1984.  Subcontractor proposed
        no escalation.

        Subcontractor, E. C. proposed an escalation of.5% for 1982.and 5.25% for
        1983.                                                                     5
                           *                                                      «.
        There is no escalation for the proposed consultants.
       .">,
       'The proposed employees are the same in both the cost and technical proposal.
       •'Aqua Associates
                                                               *
       fThe direct labor hours are in accordance with RFP specifications.
       "are 900 hours of direct clerical labor proposed.
There
        There are no employees named in the cost proposals < for prime contractor and
        subcontractor).  Therefore, we could not make any comparison with the
        technical proposal.  We did note that Aqua listed four consultants in their
        technical proposal and no consultants were proposed in the cost proposal.

        The direct labor escalation for the prime contractor is 7.6% for the base
        6,000 hours and 9.2% for the optional 3,000 hours.  The direct labor
        escalation for the subcontractor is based on approximately 10% increase on
        July 1, 1983, and 10% increase on July 1, 1984.

        The subcontractor increased his overhead rate for each of his fiscal years
        covered by the proposed contract.  For comparison purposes we computed costs
        using the base year rate for the entire proposed period.  The subcontractor
        proposed a fee of approximately 19.9% of estimated cost.  We limited fee to
        8.5% of estimated cost.  The 310,812 adjustment consists of S708 for
        indirect costs and $10,104 for fee.
   (8/90)
                                           III- 21

-------
                                                                     Exhibit A
                                                                     Page 6 of 6
     Peachy  Inc.
     The  total direct  labor hours  are  in accordance with RFP specifications.  The
     proposed subcontractor, Malcolm Lord,  Inc.,  did not propose his hours  as
     allocated by the  prime contractor.   {See Other Conroents.)   The difference  in
     cost would be insignificant,  so we  nade no adjustment.
     There  are 666 hours of direct secretarial labor proposed.   The direct  labor
     escalation factors are as follows:
      Peach Inc.

      Malcoln Lord
      Act Incorporated
      Teal Associates, Inc.
6.5% for the base 6,000 hours
16.6% for the option 3,000 hours
6.5% for the base 6,000 hours
16.6% for the option 3,000hours
6.8% for the option 3,000 hours
8% for the base 6,000 hours
8% for the option 3,000 hours
      There was no escalation proposed for the consultants.  There were no nanes
      for proposed employees in the cost proposal.
                                          >•)
(8/90)
                                          III- 22

-------
    **
              og
                       
                                                                                 in
                                                                                 c

                                                                                 
                                                            fi
                                                            o
                                                            u
            v*
ft

a
                           (0 M
                           ffi M
ract
                                   OS
                                    %
                                   c
                                   in
                                   m
                                       «5
                                     in

                                     cs
         SCO
         JJ
_    f* C
C    *J 02
&    * S
O    N O
u    •- m
0.    *i 3
                                     s
                                     CN
                                     in
              S    *
              in
                                      QC    ON
                                      VC

                                      S
                                                  s
                                                                   in
                                                                   in
                                                                   m
                                                             •5
                                                             •a
                                                             w
                                                             N
                                                        Ł    2SC
                                                        2    a T5  >.   •«-
                                                        H    3  itt **    f^
                                                        X    •""•* C  l-i     9
                                                                                 vy
                                                                                 o-
                                                                                 m
in
in
                                              vo


                                              vo
                                                                     ve
                                                                     o
                                                                                               g
                                                                                                Ł
                                                            21
                                                            X
                                                            2

                                                            |



                                                            I.
                                                            ••« tn
                                                                                                •»* M

                                                                                                "^ 0
                                                                                       52
                                                                                                B CO
                                                                                           A3
                                                                                           Ł
         «    o

         I    S
         --    a
       -•g    1
                                                                                          •W    *
(8/90)
                                                      III  - 23

-------
                                                                  Exhibit B
                                                                  Page 2 of 3

     Explanatory Notes


     Blue, Inc.

     The travel and ODC are as per RFP specifications.

     White Corporation

     The 827,393 increase is for the ODC and its applicable FICON and G&A.
     The prime contractor proposed 867,426 for ODC on the OF 60.  We could not
     determine if the remainder of the 890,000 specified in the RFP was included
     anywhere else in the proposal.  Therefore, we added the additional ODC and
     its applicable indirect burden.

     The travel is per RFP specifications.

     Fed Company

     The travel and ODC are as per RFP specifications.

     Green Associates •                    »
                                                                             *
     The S7,100 increase includes the direct labor adjustment explained in
     Exhibit A and its applicable overhead and G&A.  It also includes an adjustne
     to travel.  The contractor proposed travel of 8180.  This was for 18 trips
     from Vienna, Virginia to Washington, D.C.  In the proposal the contractor
     says the work would be perfomed in Cambridge, MA.  We priced 18 roundtrips
     from Boston, MA to Washington, D.C.  The airline fare.guide listed a range
     for economy class from 839 to 8123 one way.  We used the 8128 one way fare,
     but did not price out any per dien or ground transportation costs.

     Yellow, Inc.
     The  travel  and ODC are  in accordance with RFP specifications.

     Lilac,  Inc.

     Proposed travel  and ODC are in accordance with RFP specifications.  We
     increased the ODC for Lilac by 82,664.   It is Lilac's company policy  to
     direct  charge indirect  telephone based on direct labor hours,   wfe used  S.37
     per  each direct  labor hour.   This rate was recently recommended by  DCAA.
     The  applicable G&A was  added to the additional ODC.

     Lilac used  a composite  rate for fringe benefits and G&A.   Since the variance
     between each year is  small and since he does not show which hours are in
     each year,  we made no adjustment.

     Orange  Systems,  Inc.                                                         _

     The  proposed travel and ODC are in accordance with RFP specifications.     ^^ '
(8/90)

-------
r
                                                                       Exhibit B
                                                                       Page 3 of 3
         Aqua Associates
         The proposed travel and ODC are in accordance with RFP specifications.
         The adjustments are for the proposed subcontractor and are explained
         in Exhibit A.
         Peachy Inc.

         The proposed travel and ODC are in accordance with RFP specifications.
   (8/90)
                                              III - 25

-------
I
            Review of RFP*s -  Another  function  of the  cost  advisory
            offices is the  review of PFP's prior  to  their publication
            in Commerce Business Daily.   The contract  specialist  is
            provided with written comments from a cost analyst  who may
            assist in clarifying ambiguous or erroneous statements  in a
            given RFP, particularly in the instructions of  cost proposal
            preparation.  The  clarification of RFP instructions may
            alleviate the subsequent submission by offerers of  incomplete
            cost proposals and avoid delays in the acquisition  process
            caused by the need to request additional information.

            An example follows:
                                    h
       (8/90)
III- 26

-------
        May 15,  1984

        Comments on RFP WA84-XXXX:  Waste Technology and Studies
          Support

        John J.  Smith
        Chief,  Cost Advisory Operations

        Procurement Branch X
        Attention:  Rodney Craft
            On page 10,  paragraph  F.4  -  the  end  of the  period  of
            performance  is missing.

            Attachment C - We  recommend  adding  the following
            sentences:

            A.   Under Travel Budget  -  the  total  amount  for  travel
                is  $360,000.

            B.   Under ODC Budget - The total  amount  for  ODC is
                5360,000.

            C.   Under Computer  Budget  -  The  total  amount for computers
                is  590,000.

            D.   On  page  3  of Attachment  C, add the following sentence
                to  the first paragraph.  Include a schedule showing
                the distribution of  hours  among  the  prime contactor,
                subcontractors  and consultants.

            On page 3 of attachment  C. there  is  a  typographical  error
            - Standard Form 4411 should  be 1411.

            For  the optional 45,000  hours  in  the base period,  the RFP
            should  provide more pricing  guidance since this covers a
            two  year period.  should the contractors assume 50%  of
            the  hours will be used in  each of the  base period  years?
            Should  the contractors assume  all the  hours  will be  used
            in year  2 of the base period?  For pricing purposes,
            include  an assumption as to  when the hours will be used.
       If we can be of further assistance, please contact Jane Doe
       on extension 382-3666.
(8/90)
III- 27

-------
The Review Program for Cost and Price Analysis.

When the contracting officer requests cost analysis from the
advisory office, the cost analyst performs a specific set of
steps.  This set of steps is the "Review Program"."

Following the review program assures that at a minimum, specific
techniques and analysis are applied to all cost proposals
regardless of whom is performing the cost analysis.  It also
provides documentation to the extent a particular step was
or was not performed.

Keep in mind the review program is only a guide and the degree
of cost analysis depends on the particular situation encountered
by the cost analysis.

When the circumstances are appropriate for contracting officers
or contract specialists to perform their own cost or price
analysis, it is suggested that the review program be used as a guide.
                             111-28
 (Revised 8/90)

-------
               Environmental Protection Agency
                   Cost Advisory Section
                        Review Program
                        ( CTMSfTr .TrCVTTTl )
                                                             Work Paper
           .                                                  Reference
                                                            (page ID No. )
A.  GENERAL

    1.  Review request for cost analysis.  Attached to the    _
        request should be the contractor's proposal
        (including subcontractors) and a copy of the RFP.
        Determine scope of review and areas to be covered.
        Determine priority.

    2.  Acknowledge request and if possible, give estimated   _
        completion date.

    3.  Determine if a formal PACER (Preliminary Analytical   _
        Cost Evaluation Report) was prepared.  If so, review
        PACER report to determine if there were any
        deficiencies and/or corrections.   If not, reconcile
        the proposal to determine if it is current and has
        been submitted in accordance with the instructions
        provided in the RFP.  If the proposal does not
        reconcile to the RFP, the recomnended costs should
        reflect the hours and costs as specified in the RFP.

    4.  Has a technical evaluation been incorporated for
        those instances in which tech technical input is
        necessary (generally non-LOE procurements)?  If not
        the cost advisory report should be qualified
        accordingly.  If a technical evaluation is not
        necessary, provide a statement to that effect with
        the reason(s).

    5.  Check computations and footings in proposal for       _
        accuracy.

    6.  Determine if a revised proposal is pending.            _
        If so, discuss with the requestor whether it would
        be in the government's best interest to review the
        original proposal or wait and review the revised
        proposal .

    7.  Where applicable,  are significant differences         _
        between revised and original proposals adequately
        analyzed and explained.

    8.  Determine if the cost review can  be performed in-      _
        house based on available cost and pricing data.
        If so, proceed to Section C.

    9.  If data in files is insufficient  and/or not           _
        available, proceed to Section B - Assist Audits.
                                  IH-29
        (Revised 8/90)

-------
                           - 2 -

               Environmental Protection Agency
                    Cost Advisory Section
                        Review Program
                        (OOKSOLIEftTED)
                                                             Work Paper
                                                             Reference
                                                            (page ID tfc>.
B.  ASSIST AUDITS

    1.  If data in files is insufficient and/or dollar
        thresholds are met, request an assist audit with
        the cognizant government audit agency.

    2.  For competitive procurements, stress the need in
        the request for the costs representative of the
        hours and QDCs as specf ied in the RFP and rates
        reflective of historical and/or actual experience.

    3.  Specifically address any audit areas of special
        concern (i.e. uncompensated labor and how it is
        handled, if any, indirect rate structure changes,
        etc.)

    4.  Upon receipt of the verbal results of audit, or
        written audit report, determine if the audit was
        performed as requested.

C.  DIRECT IABOR

    1.  Determine the basis of the proposed labor rate(s),
        including the effective date of the rates.
        (category average, individual average, weighted
        average, straight average, etc.)

    2.  Verify the proposed rates with; the cognizant
        government audit agency (verbal and/or written),
        data available in EPA files, information (payroll
        verification) submitted by the contractor, or
        information/verification available through other
        government agencies.

    3.  Determine the reasonableness and acceptability of
        labor escalation.  Determine the basis of the labor
        escalation, i.e. computed by employee anniversary
        date, annual increase date or common review date.

    4.  Determine where the contractor proposes and
        recovers their indirect time (vacation, sick and
        holidays).

    5.  compute labor costs reflective of hours as
        specifed in the RFP and hourly rates reflective
        of historical and/or actual experience.
                           111-30
       (Revised 8/90)

-------
                            -3-
               Environmental Protection Agency
                     Cost Advisory section
                       Review Program
                       (CXWSQLIIMED)
                                                                  Work Paper
                                                                  Reference
                                                                 (page ID No.}

    6.  Does the contractor maintain the labor records            	
        necessary to record uncompensated overtime?  If not,
        go to Section D - Indirect Cost Rates review.

        If the answer is yes:

        Evaluate uncompensated overtime under both cost           	
        realism provisions and the Evaluation of
        Compensation for Professional Employees clause
        (Federal Acquisition Regulation 52.222-46).  If
        necessary, included specific questions in the audit
        request;

          - Does the contractor pay its professional staff        	
            for hours worked in excess of 40 hours per
            week?
          - Does the contractor record and, in turn, invoice      	
            for hours worked by its professional staff in
            excess of 40 per week?
          - What is the average work week of the                  	
            contractor's professional staff?  If it
            exceeds 40 hours, is this factored into its
            billing rate?
          - Does the contractor, by company policy, require       	
            professional employees to work in excess of your
            40 hours per week and is that factored into its
            billing rate?

D.  INDIRECT COST RATES

    1.  Determine the basis of the proposed indirect cost         	
        rates.

    2.  Verify proposed rates.   Primary verification is a         	
        formal agreement for Forward Pricing Rates provided
        by the cognizant government audit agency.

    3.  If rates have not been reviewed or negotiated,            	
        determine reasonableness of the rates from
        historical rates, current experienced rates,
        budgets and/or input from Regional and/or cognizant
        auditors,  (possibly in comparsion to negotiated
        billing rate(s),  if available)

    4.  Determine what impact,  if any,  the current proposal       	
        would have upon the indirect rates proposed.
                                111-31
 (Revised 8/90)

-------
                             -4-

               Environmental Protection Agency
                     Cost Advisory Section
                        Review Program
                                                                  Work Paper
                                                                  Reference
                                                                  (page ID No.)
   6.  Compute the impact of the recommended indirect rates on
       the costs proposed.

E. OTHER DIRECT COSTS

   1.  Review the proposed other direct costs.   Target areas
       for review.  If ODC's are RFP specified,  no further
       reveiw is required.  State this in the report.

   2.  Verify costs (unit prices) to vendor quotes, source
       documents, airline rates, etc.

   3.  On proposals that include RFP specified ODCs, determine
       if any of the ODC items are normally included in the
       contractor's indirect expense pool.

   4.  For consultants, obtain names of individuals.  Verify the
       consultant rate proposed to the signed agreement
       (including the hourly rate).  Determine if the proposed
       rate is an experienced rate (i.e.  previously billed the
       government or other client) or a quoted rate.  Obtain
       documentary support where feasible.
F. SUBCONTRACTOR COSTS

   1.  Review subcontractor costs proposed in the same manner
       as prime contractor.

   2.  Review subcontractor's proposed fee for reasonableness.
       Provide a copy of the weighted guidelines form with
       the Cost Advisory Report.

   3.  For any proposed subcontractor(s) determine the adequacy
       of their accounting system, their financial capability
       and CAS coverage.

   4.  Determine if subcontractor will allow the release
       of labor and/or indirect rate information to the prime
       contractor during the course of negotiations.
                            111-32

       (Revised 8/90)

-------
                                       -5-
                         Environmental Protection Agency
                               Cost advisory Section
                                  Review Program
                                  (CONSOLIDATED)
                                                                    Work Paper
                                                                    Reference^
                                                                    (page ID No.)
 G.  FACILITIES CAPrEVL COST OF MKEY (FCCM)

        A.  If the contractor proposes facility capital cost of
            money:

            l)  Verify the FCCM rate(s) with the cognizant government
                agency.  Include FCCM rates in the indirect rate table
                in the report.

            2)  Determine that the FCCM rate is applied to the
                appropriate base.

            3)  Recommended reduction o  the profit/fee objective
                by an amount equal to the amount of FCCM money
                allowed,  (see EPAAR 1515.970-2)

        B.  If the contractor does not propose facilities capital cost of
            money:

            1)  Recommend the clause in FAR 52.215-31 which          	
                waives the right to claim FCCM be inserted in
                the contract/subcontract(s).
 H.  OTHER
     1. Cost Accounting Standards

        Determine if the contractor is subject to Cost
        Accounting Standards (CAS) under FAR 30.201-1
        and FAR 52.230-1. (Small business and foreign
        governments are exempt from this requirement.)

        A)  If the contractor is subject to CAS, determine
            whether the contractor is subject to full or
            modified coverage.

            l)  If the contractor is subject to "full
                coverage" (all cost accounting standards
                apply), recommend the FAR clauses at
                52.230-3 "cost Accounting standards" and
                52.230-4 "Administration of Cost Accounting
                Standards."
                            111-33

((Revised 8/90)

-------
                              -6-
                Environmental Protection Agency
                      Cost Advisory Section
                        Review Program
                                                                   Work Paper
                                                                   Reference
                                                                  Ipage ID No.)
H.  OTHER
             2)  If the contractor is subject to "modified
                 coverage" (only CAS 401 and 402 apply)
                 recommend the FKR clauses at 52.230-5
                 "Disclosure and Consistency of Cost Accounting
                 Practices" and 52.230-4 "Administration of
                 Cost Accounting Standards."
             3)  Initially, contact the cognizant auditor
                 regarding the contractor's compliance or
                 noncompliance with CAS.  Detailed
                 information regarding the contractor's
                 response to noncompliance issues are available
                 from the AGO.

             4}  Notify the requestor of any noncompliance
                 issues and their impact, if any, on this
                 procurement.

             5)  If the contractor is not subject to CAS,
                 notify the requestor of this fact.
    2.  Accounting System

        Determine if contractor has an acceptable cost accounting
        system for government contracts.

            Where determination of adequacy of accounting
            system cannot be made, recommend an accounting
            system review audit be conducted ,possibly in
            conjunction with the proposal audit, or after
            submission of the first cost voucher.
                             111-34

(Revised 8/90)

-------
                              -7-
                Envirconental Protection Agency
                       cost Advisory Section
                          Review Program
                          (CCNSQLICftlED)
                                                                   Work Paper
                                                                   Reference
                                                                  {page ID No.)
    3.  Financially Capable

        Determine if the contractor has the financial capability
        to perform the contract.
I. AUDIT STEPS UNIQUE TO THE INDIVIDUAL COST ADVISORY OFFICE
   REQUIREMENTS AND/OR THE REQUEST FOR PROCUREMENT (RFP).
  CINCINNATI
                         (RTP)
                             111-35
(Revised 8/90)

-------
                              -8-
               Ermronmental Protection Agency
                      Cost advisory Section
                         Review Program
                        (CCNSQLIEftTED)
                                                                  Work Paper
                                                                  Reference
                                                                   (page  ID No.)
             - HEMXJUARTERS
  Determine the adequacy of the proposal in reference to FAR
  15.804-6 TMBLE 15-2 ("Instructions for Sutmission of a Contract
  Pricing Proposal" by element of cost).*

  * Difficulty may be experienced in getting an assist audit from
    DCAA if the necessary detailed information is not available.
  Significant changes in the total amount proposed between the
  original proposal and the BAPO (usually on competitve
  procurements) should be reviewed in detail to determine the
  specific differences, especially in the labor rates proposed.
  If significant changes have been made in the EAPO,  this point
  should be noted in the report as an item which should be
  taken into consideration in comparison with the technical
  proposal.
J. CXNCUJSICN

   1. Index and cross reference work papers.

   2. Cross reference the file copy of report to work papers.

   3. Draft and submit report.

   4. Enclose Contracting Officer Response Sheet with report.

   5. include a copy of the instructions and form for
      reporting the resolution of preaward audits to the
      IG and EPA Management associated with DCAA assist audit
      reports and request the completed forms be returned to
      Chief - WCAS.

   6. Prepare file.

   7. Request a surmary of negotiations.
                             111-36
(Revised 8/90)

-------
       what is the function of the Cost PoHcy and  Rate Negotiation
       Section (CPRNS)?
       The functions of CPRNS are:

           '  * Contracts

               when EPA is the cognizant agency,  negotiate
               indirect cost rates  for all  Federal  agencies;
               when EPA is not cognizant,  serve  as  the  Agency's
               contact point

             0 Grants

               negotiate indirect cost rates and cost allocation
               plans with state and local governments for all
               Federal agencies where EPA  is the cognizant  agency

             * formulate Agency policy on cost related  issues  and
               perform special projects as  requested

           .  ° perform quality assurance reviews of the cost
               advisory functions at the three contract operation
               sites,

                    assure quality  of cost  advisory for Federal
                    Managers Financial Integrity Act certification

                    assure EPA management of the quality of cost
                    and price analysis

                 -   assure EPA managers that cost and price
                    analysis is performed consistently  at each
                    site

             0  coordinate audit responses and tracking  of control
               system  (ATCS)  reporting for  Procurement  and  Contracts
               Management Division

             0  assist  cost analysts and contracting officers on
               indirect cost allocation and billing issues  raised
               by the  financial status monitoring reviews of
               super fund contractors

             0  provide a representative for A-76 matters to
               provide guidance,  recommendations, information  and
               advice  to EPA programs
( 8/90)
111-37

-------

-------
(I
IV.  SF 1411 - THE COST PROPOSAL
           Prior to the implementation of the FAR on April 1, 1984,
           prospective EPA contractors provider! cost and pricing, data
           on Optional Form (OF) 60.  FAR [FAR 15.804-6] requires that
           both civilian and military segments of the Federal Government
           provide price proposal information on SF 1411 "Contract
           Pricing Cover Sheet."

                     "(b)(l)  Cost or pricing data shall be
                submitted on Standard Form 1411 (SF 1411),
                Contract Pricing Proposal Cover Sheet, unless
                required to be submitted on one of the termina-
                tion forms specified in Subpart 49.6.  Data
                supporting forward pricing rate agreements or
                final indirect cost proposals shall be submitted
                in a format acceptable to the contracting officer.

                         (2)  Contract pricing proposals
                submitted on SF 1411 with supporting attachments
                shall be prepared to satisfy the instructions and
                appropriate format of Table 15-3."
           An example of SF 1411 follows:
                                      IV-1

-------
PART 53—FORMS
53.301-1411
1
CONTRACT PRICING PROPOSAL COVER SHEET
NO.
OMB NO. fl
3090-0116 V
NOTE. Thit form .1 used in contract ictiont it cubm'ssion of cost or pricing data ii required. (Set FAR t5.804-6H>ll

!gY"NIf
7. PLACEISI AND PER

CPPf Q CP1F [J CPAF
OTHER (StHdfyl
OF CONTACT
4. TYPE OF CONTRACT ACTION CC
A. NEW CONTRACT
B. CHANGE ORDER
C. PRICE REVISION/
REDETERMINATION
o. LETTER CONTRACT
E. UNPRICED ORDER
F. OTHER ISfttUfl
6. PROPOSED COST tA*B-C>
A. COST B. PROFIT/FEE C. TOT At
$ $ $


8. (-i$t and reference ine Ideniificaiion. quantity «nd total price proposed for each contract line item. A line item cost breakdown supporting trtisrecac is re-
Quired unless otherwise specified by the Contracting Officer. tContm\n on nrurn*. and tHtn on plain pfp*r. tfntctaaiy. (/«• MUM 1 tifmlil. cuttomrrftl and eonrmcf nvmttcrttl)
QYES QNO
14
D. TOTAL PRICE E. HEF.'-
.
raiJubltJ fl
6. AUDIT OFFICE . *fl
11A. DO YOU REQUIRE GOVERN- 11
MENT CONTRACT FINANCING
TO PERFORM THIS PROPOSED r
CONTRACT? at "Ytt," complct*
/(cm 11BI <-
DVES D~° C
B. TYPE OF FINANCING U on*l
D ADVANCE 1 — 1 PROGRESS
PAYMENTS L_J PAYMENTS
^] GUARANTEED LOANS
13. IS THIS PROPOSAL CONSISTENT WITH YOUR ESTABLISHED ESTI-
MATING AND ACCOUNT INC PRACTICES ANO PROCEDURES AND
FAR PART 31 COST PRINCIPLES? (It "No." •fplfinl
QYES PNO
COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD (CASB) DATA IPutlie Ltw 91-319 at om»nN NON-
COMPLIANCE *ITM vcu" DISCLOSURE STATEMENT OR COST
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS 'III " Yn." tipiMit in proposal/
Q YES Q NO
This proposal is soc-1
li. NAME AND TITLf
i 7. SkCNATu^E
NS^ 7S40-01-1«5-9S-S
(C.AS0 OS- 1 or lit II! "Ytt. - iptcify in propOM/ ttlt attic* to u.*(eA
fufrmtr'vtf and iVdclcnntnfd to 6e adequate)
Q YES Q NO
O. IS ANY ASPECT OF THIS PROPOSAL INCONSISTENT WITH YOUR
DISCLOSED PRACTICES OR APPLICABLE COST ACCOUNTING
STANOARDS?r(f "Ytt. "upturn in fnfotatt
QYES QNO
i:\tsa •* -esuonse to in*f FP conifnci.moaitication.eic. in i«m 1 and reflects our Best estimates and/or actual costs as of jh.sdate
u->prl
16. NAME O^ FIRM

1411-101

ia; DATE of SUBMISSION
1
STANDARD FORM 1411 (10-*ll jtf
pTtscoDra By GSA ^H
r AR 14* CFR) S3.215.JU) ^|
                                         IV-2
                                                                                    53-103

-------

-------
V.  PRICE ANALYSIS





     1.  Competition



     2.  Commercial Items



     3.  Comparative Analysis



     4.  Decision Flowchart

-------

-------
                    V.   PRICE ANALYSIS
The contracting officer is responsible for selecting and
using whatever price analysis techniques will insure a fai
and reasonable price.    [FAR 15.805-2]
                                                       fair
Price analysis is the process of examining and evaluating
a proposed price without evaluating its separate cost elements
and proposed profit.


To do a good job of price analysis, the analyst must know
what is being bought and what it does.   It always helps to
know what it looks like, how big it is and any other
properties that can help to understand the probable costs
of producing or otherwise acquiring it.
There is no substitute for an inquisitive attitude and
the application of common sense.  None of the techniques
presented in and of themselves supply infallible answers.
Nonetheless, there are certain advantages to having
these techniques laid out in a logical format that complies
with the procurement laws and regulations.  It is in this
context that the following methods are presented..
                           V-l

-------
Price Analysis Techniques
     Price analysis techniques can be classified into three
broad categories...
         o  COMPETITION
         o  COMMERCIAL ITEM PURCHASES
         o  COMPARATIVE PRICE ANALYSIS
                           V-2

-------
When does competition exist?
        Competition occurs when two or more offerers bid
        for the same contract.
     o  Adequate competition occurs when

           there are responsive offers

        -  there are responsible offerers

           the bids are independently submitted
     o  If price competition exists, the contracting officer
        shall presume it is adequate unless

           the solicitation unreasonably denies known
           qualified offerers from competing

        -  the low offerer has such a decided advantage
           that it is immune from competition

           there is a finding, supported by a statement
           of facts and approved at a level above the
           contracting officer, that the lowest price is
           unreasonable
        [FAR 15.804-3(b)(3)]
        price competition if
A price is "based on" adequate
        -  it results directly from price competition

           price analysis alone clearly demonstrates that
           the proposed price is reasonable in comparison
           with current or recent prices for the same or
           substantially the same items purchased in
           comparable quantities, terms and conditions
           under contracts that resulted from adequate
           price competition.
                           V-3

-------
What are the steps for price analysis based on competition?
     o  First determine that there is adequate competition.
        If the conditions for adequate price competition
        have been met, then you have made a finding of
        effective price competition.  This finding in and
        of itself justifies the price as reasonable.
     o  If not, refer to other price analysis techniques.
Any determinations of adequate competition or analysis
should be thoroughly documented and filed.
What qualifies as a commercial itempurchase?


FAR  [15.804-3] defines a commercial item purchase as one

in which price


     o  is an established catalog or market price,


     o  of commercial items,


     o  sold in substantial quantities,


     o  to the general public,


     o  and has an end use by other than the Government.
Every item must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis to
determine if it is a commercial item purchase.
                         V-4

-------
How can a determination be made that an item is a commercial
item purchase?
Established catalog price.  A catalog price is included
in a catalog, price listf schedule, or other form regularly
maintained by the manufacturer or vendor, is either published
or otherwise available for inspection by customers, and
states prices at which sales are being or were last made to
a significant number of buyers who constitute the general
public.  Those actual prices may be less than shown in the
catalog; most sellers have separate schedules of discounts
from list prices based on quantities and other factors.

Established market price.  A market price is one currently
established in the usual and ordinary course of trade
between buyers and sellers free to bargain.  It must be
established from sources independent of the manufacturer
or vendor.

Commercial item.  A commercial item (the term includes both
supplies and services) is one of a class or kind regularly
used for other than Government purposes and sold or traded
in the course of normal operations.

SubstantiaI quantitles.  Supplies are sold in substantial
quantities when the facts or circumstances support a reason-
able conclusion that the quantities regularly sold are
sufficient to constitute a real commercial market for the
item.  This test is usually in terms of total quantities
sold, but it also should include the number of times the item
has been sold, and how many times a given price or price
structure has been accepted by buyers free to choose.  Nominal
quantities, like models, specimens, samples, and prototype
or experimental units, cannot be considered to meet this
requirement.  Services sold in substantial quantities are
those customarily provided by the company, with personnel
regularly employed, and with equipment,  if any is needed,
regularly maintained either solely or principally to provide
such services.

General public.  An item is sold to the general public if
it is sold to other than affiliates of the seller for end
use by other than the Government.  Items sold to affiliates
of the seller and sales for end use by the Government are
not sales to the general public.

If the above conditions have been met and the price is
considered reasonable, then document the file for a
complete analysis.
                           V-5

-------
What arecomparative price analysis methods?
Comparative price analysis techniques rely on the use
of comparisons to some other acceptable standard.  These
include

             o  past prices
             o  Government estimates
             o  visual analysis
                           V-6

-------
Is the price reasonable in comparison with past prices?       ^^\
This" method requires access to price history records on
a line item basis.  If a past price is being used for
comparison, be sure that the past price was fair and
reasonable and is a valid standard against which to measure
the offered price.  Find out if the reasonableness of the
previous prices was established by competition,  detailed
cost analysis, an engineering estimate, or market or
catalog price.  If not, it may not be appropriate to apply
this method of price analysis.

Once you are satisfied that a previous price was reasonable,
the next step is to compare it with the current prices.
Price comparison techniques are the same, regardless of
whether the standard is a past price,  a purchase request
estimate, or an independent estimate.   Factors that might
affect the comparison include:  variations in specifications,
quantities, or delivery schedules, inflation, whether it was
Government- furnished materials or not  and the effect of
technological advances.

This type of comparison puts you in a  position to request
explanations for price differences.  If you conclude that
the past price is fair and reasonable  and that any
differences are justified, document the conclusion to
justify the price analysis decision.
If not, the next question to ask is,
                           V-7

-------
Is the pricefair and reasonable compared to a Government
estimate?
The techniques for comparing a price with a Government
estimate are the same as for comparing with past prices.
It is necessary to establish the basis for the estimate
and determine its reliability.  If a product is susceptible
to a realistic engineering estimate and that estimate has
been carefully developed after a study of drawings,  physical
inspection, and reasonable projection, it may well be a
reasonable standard.   If this is the case, the price
analysis is complete.  Enter a memorandum in the file that
explains the basis of the analysis and conclusion.
If price reasonableness
the next question is ..
still has not been established,  then

                           V-8

-------
Can a visual analysis justify the reasonableness of the
price?
Visual analysis is a fancy name for what could be caHed
"eyeballing."  It means you can get familiar with an
object by looking at one,  or a picture of one, and talking
to someone who knows how it's used.  Based on this
knowledge, you may be able to come up with a dollar
figure as to its worth or  value.  This value becomes a
standard you can use sometimes, when looking at an offered
price, a market or catalog price,  or a Government cost
estimate in making a decision to accept the offered
price or to negotiate a different  price.  It rarely is
sufficient by itself, but  if you were almost convinced
by one or more of the previous methods, it may.be enough
to finally establish the reasonableness of the price.
                           V-9

-------
The aforementioned price analysis techniques are summaried
be low:

            PRICE ANALYSIS DECISION FLOWCHART
 Is there effective price
 competition?
             No
 Is price reasonable
 compared to market or
 catalog prices?
             NO
 Is price reasonable
 compared to past prices?
             No
 Is price reasonable
 compared to an
 independent government
 estimate?	
             No
 Does visual analysis
 justify reasonableness?
             NO
 Obtain cost or pricing
 data and perform cost
 analysis
Yes
Yes
Yes
 Yes
 Yes
'Analysis
 Complete
"Analysis
 Complete^
"Analysis^
 Complete^
 Analysis'
 Complete,
^Analysis
 Complete
                            V-10

-------

-------
VI.  COST ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES
     1.  Definition



     2.  Concepts



          a.  Should Cost



          b.  Cost Normalization



     3.  Direct Labor Analysis



          a.  Direct Labor - Definition



          b.  Determination of Direct Labor Hourly Rate



          c.  Salary Escalation



          d.  Indefinite Quantity Contracts - Problems



          e.  Level of Effort Contracts - Problems



     4.  Direct Material and ODC



          a.  Material



          b.  Interdivisional Transfers



          c.  Subcontract Costs



          d.  Consultants



          e.  Special Equipment



          f.  Travel



     5.  Indirect Costs



          a.  Computation of Rates



          b.  Unallowable Costs



          c.  Billing Rates



          d.  Ceiling Rates



          e.  Rate Agreement

-------

-------
                VI.  COST ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES
Cost Analysis is the review and evaluation of the
cost elements and the proposed fee/profit of:
separate
     a)  an offerer's or contractor's cost or  pricing data end

     b)  the judgmental factors applied in projecting from
         the data to the estimated costf  in order  to forn
         an opinion on the degree to which the proposed costs
         represent what the contract should cost,  assuring
         reasonable economy and efficiency.  [FAR  15.801]


It is important to analyze proposed costs on cost  reimbursement
type contracts in terms of their cost realism  since the
Government will ultimately be liable for  reimbursement of tha
contractor's actual allowable costs subject to the limitation
of cost clause.

VJith this in mind, it is important to understand  the concepts
of should cost and cost normalization before proceeding to
specific cost analysis techniques.
                           Vl-1

-------
Should Cost
FAR 15.810 has expanded the definition of should cost;
however, this definition is more appropriate for major systems
acquisition or production.   For purposes of EPA cost analysis,
the concept of "should cost" is as follows:

     The objective of cost analysis is to arrive
     at a realistic price.   A realistic price is a
     reasonable price.  The judgment that a price is
     reasonable is based on a cost estimate that is
     attainable, an estimate of what it should cost
     if the contractor operates with reasonable economy
     and efficiency.  That is where the term "should
     cost" originated.

Should cost is a concept, not a technique.  How a conclusion
is reached that the cost is reasonably attainable and reflects
the best deal under the circumstances is not important.  There
is a relatively old concept in cost analysis that states one
should attempt to establish what it should, not what it will,
cost to do a job.  What is important is that the method used
results in a price that is based on what it should cost in
the environment and under the conditions predicted for the
performance of the contract.
                           VI-2

-------
Cost Normalization
"Normalization" is a technique sometimes
cost adjustment process in an attempt to
degree of cost realism.
used within
arrive at a
the
greater
It involves the measurement of at least two offerers against
the same cost standard or baseline in circumstances where
there is no logical basis for differences in approach,  or
in situations where insufficient information is provided
with proposals, leading to the establishment or common
'should have bid1  estimates by the agency.

The proper goal in both instructing offerers as to proposal
preparation and in conducting the probable cost evaluation
itself is to segregate cost factors which are 'company
unique'  depending  on variables resulting from dissimilar
company policies from those which are generally applicable
to all offerers and therefore subject to normalization.

Using the above definition is particularly pertinent to
our CPFF Level of  Effort (LOE) type contracts:

     To implement  the "Should Cost" concept, it is
     important to  understand that if you are consider-
     ing five proposals on a competitive RFP you should
     determine what each of the five proposals should
     cost given the individual circumstances for each
     offerer.

     Cost normalization techniques are appropriate to
     adjust the proposals where there is no logical
     basis for differences in approach or when insuf-
     ficient information is provided ith the proposals.
     To avoid this problem we commonly instruct the
     contractors in the RFP to bid predetermined amounts
     for travel, ODC's etc.  If these instructions are
     incorrectly followed or if they are not included in
     the RFP and it is later determined that no logical
     basis exists  for different estimates, then an
     adjustment should be made.  We should also be alert
     for contractors incorrectly bidding the level of
     effort.
                            VI-3

-------
A complete cost analysis should include [FAR 15.805-3]:           \

     1.  Verification of cost or pricing data and
         evaluation of cost elements including:

         (a)  The necessity for and reasonableness of
              proposed costs, including allowances for
              contingencies;

         (b)  Projection of the offerer's cost trends
              on the basis of current and historical
              cost or pricing data;

         (c)  A technical appraisal of the estimated
              labor, material, tooling and facilities
              requirements and of the reasonableness of
              scrap and spoilage factors; and

         (d)  The application of audited or negotiated
              indirect cost rates, labor rates, and
              cost of money or other factors.

     2.  Evaluating the effect of the offeror's current
         practices on future costs.  In conducting this
         evaluation, the contracting officer shall ensure
         that the effects of inefficient or uneconomical
         past practices are not projected into the future.
         In pricing production of recently developed,
         complex equipment, the contracting officer should
         make a trend analysis of basic labor and materials
         even in periods of relative price stability.

     3.  Comparison of costs proposed by the offerer for
         individual cost elements with:

         (a)  Actual costs previously incurred by the same
              offeror;

         (b)  Previous cost estimates from the offerer or
              from other offerers for the same or similar
              items;

         (c)  Other cost estimates received in response to
              the Government's request;

         (d)  Independent Government costs estimates by
              technical personnel; and

         (e)  Forecasts or planned expenditures.
                           VI-4

-------
Verification that the offerer's cost submissions are
in accordance with the contract costs principles
and procedures in Part 31 and, when applicable, the
requirements and procedures in Part 30, Cost
Accounting Standards.

Review to determine whether any cost or pricing
data necessary to make the contractor's proposal
accurate, complete, and current have not been
either submitted or identified in writing by the
contractor.  If there are such data, the contracting
officer shall attempt to obtain them and negotiate,
using them or making satisfactory allowance for the
incomplete data.
                  VI-5

-------
r
                                 DIRECT LABOR ANALYSIS


               The amount representing the cost of an element of direct
               labor is the product of two quantities, namely the number
               of man-hours of labor and the wage rate per hour  of labor,
               The cost analyst,  then, must examine both factors in the
               review of direct labor costs.

               How this is done depends on:

                       the contractor's cost accounting system,

                       the contractor's estimating system,

                    -  the requirements of the acquisition.

               This section will  look at techniques applicable to the
               direct labor cost  element of a cost proposal  as well as
               specific considerations for level of effort (LOE) and
               fixed-rate indefinite quantity contracts.
                                          VI-6

-------
what is direct labor cost?
     o  Direct labor are those hours which can be associated
        with a specific job or task.

     o  Direct labor costs are composed of 2 elements:

           the unit of time of a worker's effort
           the cost to the company for that unit of effort

     o  The number of direct labor hours times the cost
        per hour equals Direct Labor Costs.
In most cases, there is more than one worker providing effort
to the job; therefore,  using an appropriate method (discussed
later) the cost of all  employees who contribute to the job
is totaled to arrive at one summary amount for direct labor
costs.
                           VI-7

-------
How do you determine a direct labor hourly rate?
Frequently,  employers maintain a record of their employees'
salaries only for the time period of the pay check or, for
the year.  Since RFP's (request for proposals)
usually require direct labor costs in terms of direct
labor hours, it becomes necessary to convert the employee's
salary to its equivalent hourly rate in order to determine
the accuracy and reasonableness of the proposed direct
•labor costs.  Examples of how to compute the hourly labor
rate follow:
Example
     J. Smith is paid a gross monthly salary of $1,000.
     Smith's hourly rate then is:
        SI,000 x 12 months = $12,000 per year
     Normally there are 2080 possible workhours in a year
     (52 weeks x 40 hours per week)
     Therefore, the Hourly Rate = $12,000/yr. = $5.77 per hr
                                  2080 hrs/yr
Example * 2
     M. Brown's salary is recorded in the contractor's
     personnel and payroll records only at an annual
     rate of $35,000 per year.  Her hourly rate would
     then be:
          $35,000 -5 2080 hours = $16.83/hour
Notice in both of the examples that every potential workhour
is used (52 weeks x 40 hours) to arrive at the hourly rate,
even though some of these hours represent vacation time or
holidays.  Because some employees might be paid on the basis
of more or less than 40 hours per week (8 hours per day),
the analyst should be aware of the company's policy.
                           VI-8

-------
Both actual work hours, vacation and holiday hours are
included in the hourly rate calculation because each hour is
then charged  (classified) to either a direct effort or
indirect effort.

By recording costs this way, there is a record of the
total amount of direct and indirect costs at the end of
an accounting period.

If only the actual number of work hours is used to calculate
the hourly rate, then that hourly rate also includes the
cost of vacation and holiday time off.  An illustration
follows:
     Mary Brown has an annual salary of 540,000.  She
     has 2 weeks vacation time per year and is allowed
     in holidays per year.

     Her annual salary per year could be computed two ways;

       #1:  $40,000 - 2080 hours = $19.23/hr.
       *2:  540,000 - (2080-160*) = 40,000
                                    1920
                           S20.83/hr.
Note that the higher hourly rate is due to the built in cost
of vacation and holiday time.  There could also be additional
hours for personal days,  sick leave, etc. (see next page).
If "workable hours" are used to compute the hourly cost of
labor,  then any fringe benefit costs subsequently added to
labor should be exclusive of the cost of vacation, holiday
and other non-workable hours.
*2 weeks vacation
 10 holidays
equals
equals
 80 hours
 80 hours
160 hours

  Vi-9

-------
                 m
                      *  *
                c     o c *r o-
                CC     00 TP VC CN


                f-j
                                        l-l
                                       s:
    ti
10  ||
    tl
    II
    tl
CN  II
r-  n
cc  n
 ..  n
•H  II
    II
    II
    II
    II
    II
    II
    II
s
i 0!
(C >.
p. (5
•c
^i -iH
O rH
•rH O
W 31














tn
>^
(C
•c
m

^
(0
c
c
to
1-1

(C
03
3
0
,c

0

«iH
C

U-i
C

jj
c
3
C
Ł
(C

4J
CD
2





o
t-H
.C
(C
rH
•H
m
>
1C

03
^j
3
0
•c
4J
0
O
to
4J
c
3
C
u
o
<

4->
0
CD
14
•tH
T;
c
M

C
4J
t:
CP
Cn
                                                  (0
                                                  to
                                                  l-i
                                                  3
                                                  C
                                                  (0
                                                  JJ
                                                  c
                                                        VI-10

-------

How are labor rates weighted?
When several employees are proposed for one specific job
category because each will contribute only a portion
of the required direct labor hours, it becomes necessary
to calculate a representative rate for that category.

Fxample;

.The RFP estimates that 1000 hours of a senior engineer/
scientist is required.  The offerer decides to propose four
of his engineer/scientists equally at 250 hours each for
that category; however, they all earn different salaries.
To arrive at a single hourly bid rate for that category, the
offeror must weigh the hourly rates of the four employees.
                  Hrly. wage  No. of Hrs.
Engineer
Engineer
Engineer
Engineer
1
2
3
4
$12.00
$13.25
$15.00
$14.60
X
X
X
X
250
250
250
250
hrs
hr s
hrs
hrs
                                           S 3,000
                                             3,313
                                             3,750
                                             3,650
                                           $13,713
     $13,713 divided by 1000 hours = $13.71 per hour,
The computed rate of S13.71 represents the weighted average
rate of the four employees based on the ESTIMATE of each
employee providing 250 hours.  If the estimated hours
change, so would the weighted hourly rate.
                          VI-11

-------
Note that this computation could also have been
calculated by a simple mathematical average of the
hourly rates:

         $12.on
          13.25
          15.00
          14.60

         $54.85 divided by 4 employees * $13.71 per hour
Now, suppose each of the four employees are to contribute
different quantities of direct labor effort,  then the
"weighted" average rate would be computed:
                    Hours
                              Hrly.  Rate
     Engineer  1
     Engineer  2
     Engineer  3
     Engineer  4
200
300
150
350 .
X
X
X
X
$12.00
$13.25
$15.00
$14.60
                    1000 hrs.
Total Direct
 Labor Cost

  $ 2,400
    3,975
    2,250
    5,110
  $13,735
          $13,735 divided by 1000 hours = $13.74
In this example, the weighted rate is larger because the
"mix" of the individuals' hours has changed.
Therefore, the decision to alter the distribution of labor
hours also affects the outcome of the average hourly rate.

If the proposed "mix" of direct labor hours results in a
lower average hourly rate than what is actually provided
on the contract, the potential exists for a cost overrun
   a cost reimbursement contract.
on
on
When overhead, general and administrative expenses and
fee are added, the monetary difference becomes even more
significant.
                           Vl-12

-------

Two points to keep in mind when evaluating direct  labor
tni v ?
mix:
        For Fixed Rate Indefinite Quality contracts,
        the offerer is motivated to weight the
        average labor rate to the higher end in
        order to "lock" in the rate for the period
        of performance.  This does not guarantee that
        the proposed skill mix represented by that
        hourly cost will be received during contract
        performance.

        For cost type contracts, the offerer is
        motivated to propose the lowest rate possible
        for bidding purposes and would therefore
        manipulate the labor mix to reflect the lowest
        possible bid rate.  This of course would
        make the offerer's cost proposal attractive;
        however, this does not guarantee that actual
        costs are going to be the proposed
        costs.  The contractor may have been "buying
        in".  (Without ceiling restrictions in the
        contract, the offerer could actually provide
        and be reimbursed for the higher level personnel.)
        With a cost-type contract,  the Government will
        pay for the ACTUAL higher level personnel
        subject to the limitation of cost clause, even
        though the proposed and accepted direct labor
        costs were based on lower paid employees.
Conclusion:
In evaluating the composition of a direct labor category
rate, determine that the appropriate method is reasonable
in light of the contracting environment, i.e., (cost or
fixed rate) for which it was computed.
                           VI-13

-------
what is escalation and how is it determined?
Escalation is a computed percentage rate to be applied
to the current direct labor costs or hourly direct labor
rates.  The application of the percentage increases the
direct labor cost estimate.  The reason for increasing a
direct labor cost is to estimate the cost of direct labor
over a period of time by estimating future increases such
as cost of living increases and promotions.

Escalation is determined by considering the factors which
influence the cost of living decisions by management and
the promotion policies and plans of the company.  These
factors must be considered if a proper cost analysis is
being performed.  An appropriate escalation rate is one
which best reflects the future cost of labor with
consideration to the promotion and salary policies of
the company.

Here are two situations where escalation becomes an issue.
In the first case, the proposed labor is scheduled for
promotions at various times during the contract performance
period.  In the second case, the company plans on a company-
wide cost of living increase.
Example #1:
Four employees were proposed by the
contractor as follows:
    Labor  Emp,
  Category  *

  Engineer  5
  Engineer  3
  Engineer  4
  Engineer  1
     Direct
      Labor
   Hrly. Rate

     $17.90
     $14.36
     $15.20
     $ 9.26
 Proposed
  Direct
Labor Hrs.
  Direct
Labor Costs
   ino
    50
    27
    94
  SI,790
     718
     410
     870
                                271 hrs.   $3,788  i  271 =  S13.98/hr
                           VI-14

-------




m dp
r** 0
W Li JC
.H 0 fO JJ
CD
0 C Oi O
0 -i-t C JJ
^1 O> "iH C
O C > -i-i
iH K ••-(
& 0 cn c
E 0 O JC o
* QJ
•~i Li W "C
OI 0 0 *r4 CD
C O 0 (0 JJ
K C C Li U
eŁ •|~>
JC S-i C ** O
JJ O EC Li
M-l (0 &
«. Li •>
Li 0 Li 0 0
O Cu ^0 Ł* i-C
> 0 -fH JJ
0 JJ >t 0
So o **->
O (C 0 0 O
Ł Li JC Li
JJ JJ C
C O C
• O O JJ "H
0 U JJ JJ
JJ C 1C re
(0 0 -iH .H Ll
Li JC JJ
JJ 03 r-i 02
> JC 3
iH C JJ Li «H
Ll JJ C 0 rH
3 C O 0 -H
C -r< E C
JC -H C
w vc o>  Li ro 0
(C m rH
07 » 0
JJ •• VO Li CC
C , .
Li Li Li
3 M-l O 0 TO
0 O ^ J= 0
JJ -*i
0 0 "C
JC 03 0 c 0
JJ -^ rH JJ fj
(0 3 C C
w LI "c -H TO
jj 0 e
C TO J^ 03 Li
0 O J= O
W Li CC JJ V->
0O C Li
iu MJ en o 0
a -n e &
0 -C
Li 0 0 C JJ 0
rH 0 rH O i-H
CO 3 >, IT] C
CT^ *C C 0 Li *C
• 0 rH W JJ 0
m jc G.---I c jc
rH O E <0 O O
•W 0^ 0 Li O 0-




*
O
c


•
>
0
z




•
JJ
o
c
O".
vc
en
c/>
cr.
VC

en
rH


en
vc
•
en
rH

'"
•
JJ
o
0
cr.




•
rj
3
<




•
iH
3
f3


0
C
3
(-3




I>
CO
Ł




•
Li
C.

*
Li
ro
Ł




•
f^
0
EL.




*
C
TO
i-:
cr.
vc
•
cr.
iH



gf\
VC
•
CTs
•H
to

O\
VC
•
cr.
i-H
to

a,
vc
•
cr.
rH
V5-

cr.
vc
•
cr
rH
{/>

en
vc
•
cr,
rH
to

ON
VC
«
en
i-H
to

C
en
•
P^
i-H
to-

C
en
•
i^
iH







in

Li

0
C
~Ci
c
t:
CN
CN
in
,__|
V)
CN
CN
•
m
iH
to

CN
CN
•
m
rH
t/1

CN
CN
•
m
iH
t/>


CN
CN
•
in
i-H
to

CN
CN
•
in
«H
f>

CN
CN
•
in
»— i
to

vc
m
•
^r
rH


VC
m
•
^t
rH
«•

VC
m
•
^*
i-H
wv

vc
m
•
^
rH
j
0
0
C
'c
C
CŁ
VC
CN
VC
^_l

vc
CN
*
VO
fH
v>

vc
CN
•
VC
r-t
to

er
CN
•
in
rH
to


c
CN
•
in
i-H
to-

C
CN
•
IT
rH
CO-

C
CN
•
in
rH
v>

c
CN
*
in
rH
to-

e
CN
*
1/1
•H
to-

C
CN
•
in
rH
V>

C
CN
•
in
rH
t/>

C
CN
•
in
rH
to






^r

Li
0
CD
C
d
c
t:
m
VC
cr.
to
m
vc

cr.

to

m
VC
•
cr.

to

m
vc
•
en




m
vc
*
en

VI-

n
vc
•
en

to

m
vc
•
ON

VJ

m
vc
•
en

to

m
vc
•
a.

v>

m
vc
•
cr.

to

m
vc
•
cr.

Vi-

VC
CN
•
en

to






i— i

Ll
0
0
C
*Q
C
tŁ








CC
CT<
• Li
m c
i-H M-l
Vi
0
C2, O
C
Li dj
3 E
O Li
JC o
U-l
Li Li
0 0
a a

jj MH .
05 O -»J
C (ft
CJ "D O
O 0
i-i -n
O Li Li
j2 0 O
(0 Qj-C
rH flj
JJ i-H
CD o
JC 1C 0
JJ Li J=
JJ JJ
JJ C
 C Li
«G "*H
O Li O
3 JJ
C •€
J2 5*i
JJ Li
*r^ 03 (t5
i — i Q (0
3 o «
O/lt
iy
JC rH O
CC rH 0
•fH C
JJ 3
•H 1C
Li "H
- C
C JC JJ
O TO **H
•rl rH
JJ -
TO JJ 0
E 10 Li
Li JC C
O » **
M-l (p
C -U H
•H U 0
0 JC
tt rH fn
•«-l M-i
JC 0
JJ Ll •
W
C JJ JZ
C 0 -u
C C
•c o
0 « E
IR 0
(C C CN
CC -C rH




VI-15

-------

The most accurate computation of direct labor costs would
involve using the actual rate for a given month times the
number of hours estimated to be worked that month.  This
would be an extremely tedious technique and not cost
beneficial for a large number of labor categories..  The
amount of money saved by being so precise is lost due to the
additional administrative costs to achieve that preciseness.

A simpler estimation method is to calculate the average
hourly rate over the period of performance and then use that
average hourly rate to arrive at the total estimated direct
labor costs.  We've illustrated our point below:
     Engineer 5:
     Engineer 3
     Engineer 4
     Engineer 1
$17.90 x 2 mos.
S19.69 x 10 mos.
$14.36 x 5 mos.
$15.22 x 7 mos.
$15.20 x 9 mos,
$16.26 x 3 mos,
$9.26 x 1 mo.
$9.63 x 11 mos,
S 35.80
$196.90
$232.70 7 12 - $19.39
$ 71.80
$106.54
$178.34 7 12 = $14.86

$136.80
$ 48.78
$185.58 f 12 = $15.47

$  9.26
$105.93
$115.19 f 12 = $9.60
The calculated rates above represent the AVERAGE hourly rate
for the ENTIRE 12-month period of performance and reflects
the forecasted promotion plans of management.

From these rates direct labor costs can be calculated by
applying the calculated direct labor hourly rates to the
estimated number of hours.
                           VI-16

-------
Example #2:



The offerer has determined that current labor costs for
the. contract period of performance is $114,950.  This was
determined based on the current salaries; however, the
offeror is planning to award a company-wide cost of living
increase of 5% in the 4th month of the 12-month contract
performance period.

Therefore, it is necessary to project that increase in
labor cost in the offerer's labor estimate.  This calculation
can be done as follows:

The 5% increase will take place in the 4th month; therefore,

             8 months
            12 months x 5% = 3.3% escalation


so escalated labor costs will be


              5114,950 x 103.3% = $118,743
                           VI-17

-------
Example^ 2i
The ARC Corp. performs their salary review for each
employee on their anniversary date of hire.  Historically,
salary increases have averaged 7% on an annual basis.  The
proposed contract is expected to commence on January 1 and
will have a base period of one year plus two option years.
What is the acceptable labor for the base year and each of
the option years?
Answer:
In the absence of data to the contrary, it can be reasonably
assumed that salary increments will be evenly distributed
throughout the period; therefore, on the average, employees
will receive pay raises at the midpoint of performance.
Assuming this to be the case, the escalation for the first
year will be 7% x 1/2 x 5100,000 or 83,500.  The acceptable
labor for the first year is $103,500 (5100,000 + 53,500).
The acceptable labor  for the second would be 5110,745
(1.07 x 5103,500) and for the third year it would be
5118,497 (1.07 x 5110,745).
                           VI-18

-------
What basis is used to arrive at an appropriate escalation
factor?
When promotions are forecasted for direct labor employeesr
look to the past promotion practices and percentages given
by the contractor to determine if the escalation factor
is reasonable and appropriate.

Cost of living raises are tied to inflation.   The basis
for granting such raises is to allow employees to maintain
the purchasing power of their current salaries because
inflation erodes the purchasing power of money.  Since
the basis for granting cost of living raises should be
directly tied to inflation, it is important to be aware
of the forecasted rate of inflation, not the historical
rate of inflation.

One of the many erroneous assumptions used for proposing
cost of living increases is that the past inflation rate
is indicative of the rate and therefore
should be used as the basis for estimating future costs.
        In determining a reasonable escalation rate,
        don't presume that 10% rate of inflation
        last year means 10% this year; this type of
        rationale is what fuels the inflationary
        spiral.
        In evaluating an inflation rate,  look at
        future projections for the economy,  partic-
        ularly the costs of goods, services and the
        cost of labor.   This type of information can
        be found in many of the publications put out
        by data forecasting services*.
*Commonly used forecasting services:

        Data Resources,  Inc.  (DRI)
        Consumer Price Index  (CPI)
        Labor Forecasts from  the Bureau of Labor Statistics
                          VI-19

-------
Another common error made in evaluating escalation is the
assumption of its permanence.  Inflation characterized the
late fin's and 70 's
economic inflation
the 70 ' s.  Because
people have become
prices must always
                     Prior to that there were periods of
                   but nothing like the rampant inflation of
                   of the long period of rising prices,
                   conditioned to thinking that wages and
                   rise,  and therefore expect wage increases,
        As a result of wage increases,  the price of
        goods and services do rise and in effect
        inflation results.
        One of the goals of Federal Government auditors
        is to aggressively attack the direct labor salary
        "creep".  In periods of recession in the economy,
        salary increases should reflect merit increases.


In summary, when evaluating escalation factors, consider
the following:

     1)  what is the company policy for salary increases?

     2)  What has been awarded to employees in the past?

     3)  What are the forecasting services predicting for
         the next quarter or year?

     4)  what type of contract pricing arrangement is
         being anticipated?
                           VI-20

-------

what particular problems with direct labor cost estimates
are associated with fixed rate indefinite quantity contracts?
The fixed rate indefinite quantity contract,  where a labor
hour is the product unit, "locks in" a labor  rate for
a specified period:

     1.  In circumstances where the type of labor is
         readily available in the commercial  market
         place,  a price analysis may be sufficient
         to determine the reasonableness of price.
         For example, guard service, custodians,
         computer technicians,  electricians,  etc.

     2.  When cost analysis is necessary to determine
         the reasonableness,  the base labor rate
         (unescalated) should be evaluated carefully
         for the contractor's assumption for  proposing
         a fixed rate.

     3.  The use of category averages for calculating the
         fixed rate is more appropriate than  key  personnel
         because the use of a particular employee's
         salary for determining a fixed rate  implies the
         availability of that employee for the duration
         of contract performance.

         The use of category averages as a basis  for fixed
         rate assures a level of labor quality availability
         instead of the availability of the employee.
         However,  it can also result in built-in  profit if
         lower salaried people  are provided.   Therefore,
         when relying on category averages-as a basis of
         determining fixed rates, caution should  be
         exercised when there are wide variances  in the
         individual rates comprising the fixed rate.
                          VI-21

-------
What particular problems with direct labor cost estimates
are associated with CPFF - Level of Effort contracts?
The Level-of-Effort contract in EPA defines labor with
general labor classification such as:

               PL-1   (Professional Level One)
               TL-3   (Technical Level Three)
These labor categories do not encourage specific classifi-
cation of employees.  As a consequence, a contractor may
propose a labor category rate which could be representative
of a wide range of hourly rates and skills.
When evaluating LOE labor category rates:


     1.  Review the experience and educational levels
         as specified in the RFP's.

     2.  Review the disparity between the highest and
         lowest hourly rate in a particular category.

     3.  Remember that it is to the contractor's
         advantage to bid the lowest rates for award
         purposes because technical quality is usually
         more important than cost.
                           VI-2 2

-------
                 DIRECT MATERIALS AND ODC
What items are considered direct material costs and other
direct costs?
First let us go back to the definition of a direct cost.
     "Any cost that is specifically identified with a
      particular final cost objective."
In other words, any incurred cost which can be directly
associated with a contract.
Typical direct material and other direct costs includes
  Direct
  Materials
Subcontracted parts and components
Purchased parts
Commercial item purchases
Interdivisional transfers
Raw materials
  Other
  Direct
  Costs
Travel
Supplies
Consultants
Xeroxing
Special Equipment
Printing and Reproduction
Freight and Postage
Telephone
                           VI-23

-------
How are material and other direct costs to be evaluated?
Material Costs:
     o  Verify the unit prices to:

           vendor quotes
           recent purchase orders
           current supplier lists
        -  price lists and catalogs
     o  Standard commercial items should be analyzed using
        price analysis techniques.
     o  Review the number of units for consistency with
        the proposed effort.
     o  Verify the mathematical extensions of price x
        quantity = total estimated cost.
     o  If all of the above steps are met and if the costs
        proposed are considered fair and reasonable, then
Document the basis for acceptance of the proposed costs to
complete the review.
                            Vl-24

-------
Interdivisional Transfer

An interdivisional transfer is a "sale" of materials or
services between two divisions or segments of one company.

Interdivisional sales or transfers of materials should  be
ordinarily handled on a costr  no-profit basis to the
transferor.  However, transactions involving items that are
regularly manufactured and widely sold by a contractor  may
be handled on a basis that recognizes a fair profit return
if the contractor's organization is structured along profit
center lines and the transferring segment is operated as a
separate entity required to perform on a self-sufficient
basis.

     When reviewing an Interdivisional transfer
     o  determine the basis for pricing,
     o  review the cost element(s)  if the interdivisional
        transfer has more than one  cost factor,
        determine whether divisional profit is included
        or not and verify whether it is consistent  with
        the contractor's company policy and any prior
        contractual agreement with the Government.
                          VI-25

-------
Subcontractor Costs
Subcontractor's proposals over $500,000 should be detailed
in the same format as the prime contractor.  Rut for any
amount, you should obtain sufficient information from" the
prime contractor to satisfy yourself of the reasonableness
of costs.
FAR 15.805-5(1)
further....
details the cost analysis responsibilities
          The prime contractor or higher tier
          subcontractor is responsible for
          conducting appropriate cost analyses
          before awarding subcontracts.  However,
          the contracting officer may request
          audit or field pricing support to
          analyze and evaluate the proposal of a
          subcontractor at any tier (notwithstanding
          availability of data or analyses performed
          by the prime contractor) if the contracting
          officer believes that such support is
          necessary to ensure reasonableness of the
          total proposed price.  This step may be
          appropriate when,  for example—

          (1)  There is a business relationship
               between the contractor and sub-
               contractor not conducive to
               independence and objectivity;

          (2)  The contractor is a sole source and
               the subcontract costs represent a
               substantial part of the contract
               co st;

          (3)  The contractor has been denied
               access to the subcontractor's
               records; or

          (4)  The contracting officer determines
               that, because of factors such as the
               size of the proposed subcontractor
               price, audit or field pricing
               support for a subcontract or sub-
               contracts at any tier is critical to
               a fully detailed analysis of the
               prime contract proposal.
                           VI-26

-------
(I
(j)   When the contracting officer requests the cogni-
     zant AGO or  auditor  to  review a  subcontractor's
     cost estimates,  the  request shall include,  when
     available, a copy of any review  prepared  by the
     prime contractor or  higher  tier  subcontractor,
     the subcontractor's  proposal,  cost or pricing
     data provided by the subcontractor,  and the
     results of the prime contractor's cost or price
     analysis.

(k)  .When the Government  performs the subcontract
     analysis, the Government shall furnish to the
     prime contractor or  higher  tier  subcontractor
     reviewed, a  summary  of  the  analysis performed
     in determining any unacceptable  costs, by
     element,  included in the subcontract proposal.
     If the subcontractor withholds consent,  the
     Government shall furnish a  range of unacceptable
     costs for each element  in such a way as to
     prevent giving away  subcontractor proprietary
     data.
           A price analysis should be performed for all significant
           proposed subcontracts.

           A cost analysis should be performed on prospective sub-
           contractor ( s) when cost or pricing data is required or
           when the contractor is unable to perform an adequate price
           analysis.  (FAR 15.805-1)

           REMEMBER:

           The proposed subcontractor fee/profit is an element of cost
           to the prime contractor? therefore, it should be evaluated
           like any element of cost by applying the appropriate EPA
           fee/profit guidelines.
                                     Vl-27

-------

When evaluating consultants:

     o  Obtain the names of the individual consultants
        and/or the consulting firms,
     o  Request a copy of the consultant agreement and/or
        a copy of the consultant's proposal,


     o  Review any available information on the prior
        use of the consultant,

        -  Is the proposed rate equal or appropriate
           to the rate charged previously to the
           Government or other clients.
           Can the proposed number of hours realistically
           be provided?
     o  Verify the mathematical calculation.
Document the findings for the file to complete the review
                            Vl-28

-------
 Special  Equipment
 Special equipment may  require  technical evaluation  beyond
 the  capacity  of  a cost and  price  analyst;  therefore the
 cost analyst  should  seek  the appropriate expertise  to
 assist  in  the evaluation  of the proposed costs  for
 specialized equipment.

 After a technical analysis  on  the equipment has been
 performed  or  acquired

      o  Inquire  as to  whether  the equipment is
        available from Government stock,
     o  If the equipment will be contractor-
        purchased, will it be direct charged or
        capitalized,
     o  Determine whether the proposed price is
        acceptable

        -  Compare the price with two or more other
           quotes
           Perform a lease vs. buy analysis
           FAR 31.205-36 discusses Rental Costs (operating
           leases)
           FAR 31.205-11 discusses Rental Costs (capital
           leases)
           FAR 31.205-2 discusses ADPE Lease Costs
     o  Verify mathematical extensions for accuracy.
Document the file to complete the analysis.
                            VI-29

-------
Travel Costs
Travel costs include such items as:

          airfares                    meals
          taxi fares                  lodging
          rental cars                 mileage
     o  Assure yourself of the reasonableness of the
        proposed travel based on the needs of the
        prospective contract.
     o  Verify airfares to the Official Airlines
        Guide (OAG).
           Use the standard coach fare as a guide
           for acceptance of proposed airfare
     o  Review ground transportation for reasonableness
        and necessity.
           Include corporate discounts for car rental
           (usually 20%).
     o  Off-site subsistance must be in accordance with
        company policy and at rates which are not excessive,
        Also compare the rates against government travel
        rates.
If the costs are determined to be reasonable, then document
the findings for the file.
                            VI-30

-------
In general, wher^ reviewing_other_ direct costs;
     o  Review the necessity of the cost to the contract.
     o  Are the proposed units consistent with the
        contract requirements?
     o  Are the unit prices reasonable?
     o  Verify the mathematical extensions.
     o  Is the item a direct charge to the contract?
     o  DOCUMENT the findings and conclusions.
                           VI-31

-------
I
                                     INDIRECT COSTS
               (FAR 42.703]  It  is  the  policy under FAR that a single agency
               shall  be  responsible  for  establishing  indirect cost rates and
               that these  rates shall  be binding on all agencies andTtheir
               contracting officers  unless  otherwise  prohibited by statute.
               [FAR 42.703]

               [EPAAR 1542.705-1]  Furthermore,  it is  the policy of EPA for
               Cost Policy and  Rate  Negotiation Section of  P&CMD to be
               responsible for  negotiating  final indirect cost rates in
               accordance  with  EPA contracting  officer procedures.

               If  a question arises  regarding the appropriateness and
               applicability of any  indirect cost rate or its allocation
               base,  consult your  EPA  Cost  Advisory Office.  The staff of
               accountants possess the in-depth knowledge of accounting
               principles  required to  deal  with indirect cost issues.
                                         VI-32

-------
What is an indirect cost?
      [FAR 31.203] "An indirect cost is any cost not
     directly identified with a single,  final cost
     objective, but identified with two or more final
     cost objectives or an intermediate cost objective."
I_llu_stration #1

Carl, an engineer with Clean-Up, Corporation spends
all of his working hours on 3 projects: Contract 1,
Contract 2 and Contract 3.  So, Carl can attribute his
workday to a specific final cost objective the completion
of contract 1, 2, or 3.

THEREFORE, Carl's salary is a direct cost to contract 1,
2 or 3 based on the amount of time he spends on each
contract.

In contrast, Joanna's time as president of Clean-Up
Corporation is not spent on any particular contract.  She
spends her time in meetings and deciding the corporation's
overall future.  She could not attribute her workday to a
specific final cost objective such as a particular contract.
Her time and efforts benefit the company as a whole (several
objectives); therefore, her salary is an indirect cost.
Illustration $2

The monthly office rent of Company XYZ is 52,500.  The
office space is used for all company operations,  direct
and indirect.  Because there are no designated usage
areas of the office, the $2,500 is considered beneficial
to all operations of the company (several final cost
objectives) and is classified as indirect.
                          VI-33

-------
r
               Why are  indirect  costs referred  to  by many  titles?


               Indirect costs  are generally  titled:

                         Overhead
                         General and administration (G&A)
                         Material overhead
                         Subcontracting overhead
                         Fringe  benefits

               The various  titles distinguish the  base and pool  from which
               the indirect  cost was derived.   Note that  the  term  "overhead"
               is also  used  in a general  sense  to  describe indirect costs
               rather than  a specific indirect  cost pool as  shown above.
               What  do  the  terms  "base"  and  "pool" refer  to  and how are
               indirect rates  determined?

               An indirect  rate,  usually expressed as  a percentage,
               is the result of dividing the  indirect  cost pool by the
               appropriate  allocation  base  for  a  specific accounting
               period.
                                         Indirect Cost Pool
                   Indirect  Cost Rate -   Allocation Base
               An  indirect  cost  pool  is a grouping of  incurred costs
               identified with two or more cost objectives but not
               specifically identified with any final  cost objective.

               The allocation base .is the grouping of  incurred costs
               benefited by the  indirect cost pool.
                                        VI-34

-------
        Example of IndirectCost Rate Development
Total



Salaries (labor)
Fringe Benefits
Travel
Supplies
Publications
Subcontracts
Consultants Fees
Rent/Utilities
Computer Charges
Insurance
Other Costs
Total Costs
Company Cost

Direct
Costs
$1,000,000

60,000
9,000
20,000
300,000
40,000

26,000

25,000
$1,480,000
Budget
Indirect

Overhead
$275,000
400,000
5,000
4,000



136,000

10,000
40,000
$870., 000

Costs

G&A
$125,000

10,000
2,000
13,000

20,000

40,000
10,000
30,000
$250,000
For a single indirect rate structure;
    Indirect Rate =
$1,120,000
$1,000,000
    Indirect Rate ~ 112.0%
For a two-rate structure:
    Overhead Rate =  $870,000
                    $1,000,000
                  = 87%
               ($870,000 + $250,000)
               (Direct Labor Costs)
              (Overhead Costs)
              (Direct Labor Costs)
    G&A Rate
=  $250,000
  $2,350,000

- 10.6%
              (G&A Costs)
              (Direct Costs &
                    Overhead Costs)
                          VI-35

-------
Once a rate has been determined, it is applied to the base
used to calculate the rate.
          Indirect Costs = 112% x Direct Labor Costs
          Overhead Costs = 87% x Direct Labor Costs
          G&A Expense
10.6% x (Direct Costs &
              Overhead Costs)
                           VI-36

-------
what are unallowable costs?


Unallowable costs are those costs which are

          expressly unallowed by the cost principles, 01

          mutually agreed to be unallowable.

Unallowable costs are to be identified and excluded
from any billing, claim or proposal applicable to a
government contract [FAR 31.206]

Some common unallowable costs found in a contractor's
indirect cost proposal are:

          Advertising           [31.205-1]
          Bad Debts             [31.205-3]
          Contingencies         [31.205-7]
          Contributions         [31.205-8]
          Entertainment         [31.205-14]
          Idle Facilities Costs [31.205-17]
          Interest              [31.205-20]
          Lobbying              [31.205.22]
          Organization Costs    [31.205-27]


Costs which are not considered unallowable in a
contractor's indirect cost proposal, but are often
controversial, are:
          Controversial Costs

          Compensation
          Depreciation
          Pesearch & Development
          Related party transactions
          Selling Costs
          Rental Costs
[31.205-6]
[31.205-11]
[31.205-18]
[31.205-26{e)]
[31.205-38]
[31.205-36]
These costs are considered controversial for several
reasons:

     -  magnitude of the cost
        basis for incurring the cost
        basis for calculation of the costs
     -  the degree of benefit received by the Government
                          VI-37

-------
How is a billing rate established?

Before responding to this question, contract specialists
should be reminded that the process of reviewing and
negotiating indirect rates involves complex analysis,
(i.e. knowledge of the contractor's accounting system,
cost principles, cost accounting standards, etc.)
therefore, the negotiation of billing rates should not
be conducted without the advice of the cost analyst.
                                                                 r>
When reviewing the billing rates in a contractor's
cost proposal, the cost analyst
    determines the contractor's basis for proposing
    the indirect cost rates

        - review the assumptions made
        - review the allocation base
  0 verifies the proposed rates to

        - the cognizant government audit agency
          (usually Defense Contract Audit Agency)

        - previously negotiated billing rates if
          they are applicable to the same accounting
          period

        - budgets submitted by the contractor which
          forecasts the indirect expense rates for the
          contract period of performance
  0 determines what impact the award of the contract
    may have on the contractor's indirct expense rates

    - if the potential contract award amount is
      significant relative to the contractor's
      other government and/or commercial sales,
      the indirect expense rates may decrease and
      this effect should be considered in negotiations
    determines if ceiling rates should be recommended
    using the guidelines of FAR 42.707 (see next page)
                          VI-38

-------
The cost analyst has the responsibility to review the
proposed indirect expense rates even though another
government agency has approved billing rates.  If the
assumptions for which the existing billing rates were
established is valid, then the analyst may recommend
the prevailing government approved indirect expense
rates.  Whatever recommendation is made, the analyst
must thoroughly document the basis of the recommendation.
                          VI-39

-------
When may it be appropriate to provide for a ceiling on indireclF )
cost rates beyond which the contractor will absorbthe costs?


It may be appropriate if:

     (1)  The proposed contractor is a new or recently
          reorganized company, and there is no past
          or recent record of incurred indirect costs.

     (2)  The proposed contractor has a recent record
          of a rapidly increasing indirect cost rate
          due to a declining volume of sales without
          a commensurate decline in indirect expenses.

     (3)  The proposed contractor seeks to enhance its
          competititve position in a particular
          circumstance by basing its proposal on
          indirect cost rates lower than those that
          may reasonably be expected to occur during
          contract performance, thereby causing a cost
          overrun.

When any of the above situations (or a comparable
situation) is apparent, an equitable ceiling covering the
final indirect costs rates should be negotiated and specified
in the contract.

When ceiling provisions are utilized, the contract
shall also provide that (1) the Government will not be
obligated to pay any additional amount should the final
indirect cost rates exceed the negotiated ceiling rates and,
(2) in the event the final indirect cost rates are less than
the negotiated ceiling rates, the negotiated rates will be
reduced to conform with the lower rates. [FAR 42.707]
                           VI-40

-------
            What is a negotiated indirect cost rate agreement?
            On the following pages  is an example of a negotiated
            indirect cost rate agreement.  When EPA is the cognizant
            agency for a contractor's final  indirect rates  [FAR 42.703],
            the Cost Policy and Rate Negotiation Section negotiates
            the final indirect rates and issues the Agreement.

            The Agreement will provide information such as:

                  (!)  The type of rate being agreed to, whether
                      final indirect cost rates or interim billing
                      rates.

                  (2)  The description of the rates being agreed to,
                      i.e., overhead, fringe benefits, etc.

                  (3)  The effective period of the rate.

                  (4)  The rate itself, expressed as a percentage
                      or dollar amount.
(i
(5)   The allocation base for the rate.

(6)   The list of EPA cost reimbursement type
     contracts for which the rates apply.  (see
     Attachment A)
            The agreement may also provide information on any
            restrictions or ceilings which may supercede the agreement
            as explained in paragraphs 3 and 4.
                                       VI-41

-------
       UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                   WASHINGTON, D.C.  20460
         NEGOTIATED INDIRECT COST RATE AGREEMENT
Contractor:  XYZ Incorporated
   Date:  August 1, 19XX
1.  This Agreement is entered into by and between the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and XYZ, Incorporated.
The purpose of this Agreement is to establish negotiated
indirect cost rates applicable to the EPA contracts shown
on Attachment A.

2.  This Agreement is entered into in accordance with Federal
Procurement Regulations (FPR) 1-3.705 and 1-3.706.

3.  Subject to the provisions listed elsewhere in this
Agreement, the rates listed below are established as
negotiated indirect cost rates,  in effect for the period(s)
specified, applicable to the contracts listed on Attachment
A and are incorporated into the contracts in accordance with
FPR l-3.705(g).
                        Effective Period
                        From
To
Rate
      Type

Final:
 Fringe Benefits
 Overhead
 Overhead - Chicago
 Gen. & Administrative

Basis for Application;
(a)  Direct labor dollars
(b)  Direct labor plus applicable fringe benefits
(c)  Total costs incurred exclusive of general and
     administrative expenses
7/1/81
7/1/81
7/1/81
7/1/81
6/30/82
6/30/82
6/30/82
6/30/82
13.97%
88.66%
40.91%
16.11%
Base
                                                     (a)
                                                     (b)
                                                     (b)
                                                     (c)
4.  Incorporation of this rate agreement
listed on Attachment A:
     in the contracts
    a.  Shall not change any indirect cost rate ceiling,
    monetary ceiling, contract obligation, or specific
    allowance or disallowance provided in the terms and
    conditions of affected contracts.  For those contracts
    containing indirect cost rate ceilings which are less
    than the rates contained in this Agreement, final and
    provisional rates shall not exceed the specified
    ceiling rates.
                          VI-42

-------
    b.  Is not a waiver by EPA of the Limitation of Cost
    Clause or authorization for the contractor to exceed
    the current estimated cost set forth in the contract,
FOR THE CONTRACTOR:
FOR THE U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL
  PROTECTION AGENCY:
Signature
Signature of Contracting Officer
Vice President/Treasurer    	
Name and Title              Name of Contracting Officer  .
August 1, 19XX
Date
Date
                            Negotiated by:  J. S. Smith
                            Telephone:  (202)  382-1111
                          VI-43

-------
                                               Attachment A
                    XYZr  Incorporated
SCHEDULE OF EPA COST REIMBURSEMENT TYPE PRIME CONTRACTS


                     Contract Number
                        68-01'
                        6B-01'
                        68-01
                        68-01-
                        68-01
                        68-01
                        68-01
                        68-01
                        68-02
                        68-02
                        68-03
                        68-03
                        68-03
                        68-03
                        68-03
                        68-03
-xxxx
-xxxx
-xxxx
-xxxx
-xxxx
-xxxx
-xxxx
-xxxx
-xxxx
-xxxx
-xxxx
-xxxx
-xxxx
-xxxx
-xxxx
-xxxx
                           VI-44

-------


-------
VII.  FEE/PROFIT ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES






     1.  Definition



     2.  EPA Policy



     3.  Limitations




     4.  Profit Objective Guidelines



     5.  Subcontractor Fee/Profit



     6.  EPA Form

-------
           VII.  Fee/Profit Analysis Techniques
The FAR defines proEit or fee as an element of the
potential remuneration that contractors may receive
for contract performance over and above allowable
costs.
Profit serves the function of being [FAR 15,901]...
     -  a potential financial reward
     -  a stimulant for efficient contract performance
     -  an attractor of best capabilities
                          vn-1

-------
What is EPA's policy on fee/profit determination?
EPA policy elaborates on the fe'e profit factor
[EPAAR 1515.970-1]  It is the policy of the Agency to
utilize profit to attract contractors who possess talents
and skills necessary to the accomplishment of the objectives
of the EPA, and to stimulate efficient contract performance.
In negotiating profit or fee, it is necessary that all
relative factors be considered,  and that fair and reasonable
amounts be negotiated which give the contractor a profit
objective commensurate with the nature of the work to be
done, the contractor's input to the total performance,
and the risk assumed by the contractor.

[EPAAR 1515.9021 Agencies are required to use the structured
approach for determining the profit or fee objective in
those acquisitions that require cost analysis.

The purpose of the structured approach is:

     (1)  To provide a standard method of evaluation;

     (2)  To ensure consideration of all relevant factors?

     (3)  To provide a basis for documentation and
          explanation of the profit negotiation objective;

     (4)  To allow contractors to earn profits commensurate
          with the assumption of risk;

     (5)  To reward contractors who provide their own
           facilities, financing and personnel; and

     (6)  To reward contractors who undertake more
          difficult work requiring higher risks.
                            i-2

-------
[EPAAR 1515.9-2]  Contracting Officers may use other
methods than the structured approach for establishing
profit/fee objectives under the following circumstances:

     (1)  Architect-engineering contracts;
     (2)  Personal or professional service contracts;
     (3)  Management contracts,  e.g.,  for maintenance
          or operation of Government facilities;
     (4)  Termination settlements;
     (5)  Engineering services,  labor-hour,  time and
          materials contracts which provide  for payment
          on a man-hour,  man-day,  or man-month basis,
          and where the contribution by the  contractor
          constitutes the furnishing of personnel
          rather than the output of an integrated
          research, engineering, or manufacturing
          operation;

     (6)  Construction contracts;  and

     (7)  Cost-plus-award-fee contracts.
                        VII-3

-------
Are There Any Limitations on the Amount of Fee/Profit That
Can Be Negotiated?

[FAR 15.903(d)(l)] The contracting officer shall not"
negotiate a price or fee/profit that exceeds the following
statutory limitations imposed by 10 U.S.C. 2306(d) 41
U.S.C. 254(b).

     (1)  For experimental, developmental, or research
          work performed under a cost-plus-fixed-fee
          contract, the fee shall not exceed 15 percent
          of the contract's estimated cost, excluding
          fee.

     (2)  For architect-engineering services for public
          works or utilities, the contract price or the
          estimated cost and fee for production and
          delivery of designs, plans, drawings, and
          specifications shall not exceed 6 percent of
          the estimated cost of construction of the
          public work or utility, excluding fees.

     (3)  For other cost-plus-fixed-fee contracts, the
          fee shall not exceed 10 percent of the
          contract's estimated cost, excluding fee.

          The limitations above shall apply also to the
          maximum fees on cost-plus-incentive-fee and
          cost-plus-award-fee contracts.  However, the
          maximum-fee limitation for a specific
          cost-plus-incentive-fee or cost-plus-award-fee
          contract may be waived in accordance with
          Subpart 1.4.
                          VII-4

-------
THE THREE MAJOR SEGMENTS OF PROFIT GUIDELINES ARE:
  I.  COST INPUT TO TOTAL PERFORMANCE
      ("Above the line" elements of cost)
 II.  ASSUMPTION OF CONTRACT COST RISK
       (Type of contract and related risk factors)
III.  RECORD OF PERFORMANCE
                          VII-5

-------

                PROFIT OBJECTIVE GUIDELINES
1%
1%
1%
8%
6%
5%
4%
2%
1%
5%
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
4%
5%
2%
15%
9%
9%
7%
5%
3%
8%
  I.  CONTRACTOR'S INPUT TO TOTAL PERFORMANCE;

      Direct Materials
         Purchases
         Subcontracts
      Equipment
      Engineering Labor
      Engineering Overhead
      Manufacturing Labor
      Manufacturing Overhead
      Consultants
      Other Direct Costs
      G&A Expenses

 II.  CONTRACTOR'S ASSUMPTION OF CONTRACT COST RISK Q'% to 6%
III.   RECORD OF CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE;  -2% to

      Cost efficiency
      Management
      Extent of contractor investment
      Reliability of cost estimates
      Inventive and developmental contributions
      Timely performance
      Small business participation
      Labor surplus area participation
      Extent of Government assistance
      Effect of competition

      SELECTED FACTORS;

        Source of resources
        Special technical achievement
        Extraordinary delivery schedule
        Competition
        Extent of Government assistance
        Extent of contractor's investment
        Character of the contractor's business
        Subcontracting
                          VII-6

-------
What Considerations are there for each major profit segment?
In evaluating the contractor's input to total performance,
you should consider the elements addressed in each major
segment area as discussed in detail in EPAAR 1515.970-2.

I.  Cost Input to Total Performance

In assigning specific weights to each element of cost,
consideration should be given to:

     o  the assumption of risk should be commensurate
        with the amount of profit;
     o  the degree of the contribution of the contractor's
        own facilities, financing and personnel; and
     o  the difficulty of the work undertaken.
                          vn-7

-------
(1)   Direct Materials (Purchased parts, subcontracted
     items and other materials)
                                                       r>
(2)
(a)  The amount of managerial and technical
     effort required to obtain the materials;

(b)  Whether this requires new source develop-
     ment or existing source availability;

(c)  How much managerial/technical expertise
     is needed to administer subcontracts.

Equipment
              *
(a)  Refers to producing a test equipment, not
     end product.

(b)  The assignment of weights should reflect
     whether equipment is contractor furnished
     or government furnished.
(3)   Labor

     (a)
     Consideration should be given to the quality
     and level of expertise and experience of the
     contractor's labor as a whole
     (b)   Consideration should also be given to the
          amount of notable scientific talent.

     (c)   Remember that the manufacturing labor includes
          all non-professional,  secretaries, technicians
          and carpenters.
(4)   Overhead
     (a)   Evaluation should reflect the relationship of
          the items in the overhead pool to the contract
          performance; the closer the relationship,  the
          greater the weight.

     (b)   The contractor's accounting system does not
          have to correspond to the fee/profit guideline
          classification.   When practicable, the
          Contracting Officer should break out the
          applicable sections of the indirect rate(s)
          which could be classified as engineering
          overhead, manufacturing overhead, and G&A
          expenses and follow the appropriate evalu-
          ation technique.

                     Vii-8

-------
     (c)  Once the fee/profit factors have been assigned
          for a particular contractor, the weight assigned
          may be used for future procurements with the
          same contractor until there is a change in the
          cost composition of the overhead pool or the
          contract performance.

{5}   Consultants

     (a)  The assignments of weights should reflect the
          talent and skill of the consultant.

     (b)  The assignment of weights should also reflect
          whether the consultant is substituting for
          in-house personnel or whether there is a true
          contribution of expertise.

(6)   Other Direct Cost

     (a)  The analysis of these costs should be performed
          in a similar manner as direct materials.
                     Vii-9

-------
II.  Contractor*s Assumptionof Cost Risk

     (1)  Must consider the degree of cost responsibility
          the contractor is assuming.

     (2)  Must consider the reliability of the cost
          estimates in relationship to the task assumed.

     (3)  Must consider the chance of risk or failure.
     The Government's intention is to shift the burden of
     risk as much as possible to the contractor and then
     compensate the contractor for that risk.

     Therefore, consider that for a best efforts CPFF
     contract would be assigned 0.  As risk is assured,
     the factor increases.
                          vn-in

-------
III.  Record of Contract Performance

     (!)   The purpose of the fee/profit factor is to reward
          or penalize for past performance and in consideration
          of this the contractor would be motivated to improve
          his/her performance.

     (2)   The assignment of this factor is judgmental.

     (3)   A satisfactory rating merits a 0 weight.

     .{4)   The factors in arriving at a performance weight
          include:

             cost efficiency
          -  management
             extent of the contractor's investment
             reliability of cost estimates
             inventive and developmental contributions
             timely performance
             small business participation
             labor surplus, area participation
             extent of government assistance
                          VII-11

-------
What are the factors to consider for the evaluation of
subcontractor fee/profit?

When evaluating the fee or profit proposed by the
subcontractor, remember that the proposed subcontractor's
fee is an element of cost to the prime contractor and
should be evaluated as such.

     In evaluating the subcontractor's fee, remember

     0  the subcontractor's fee is an element of cost to
        the prime contractor and the Federal Government;

     0  the assignment of weight should reflect how much
        technical effort the subcontractor is contribut-
        ing to the contract;

     0  the assignment of weight should reflect the nature
        of the subcontractor's contribution,, i.e., labor,
        materials, etc.
h
                          VII-12

-------
What required forms are there for the profit determination
process?

[EPAAR 1515.970-2] Contracting Officers should use EPA
Form 1900-2, Profit/Fee Objectives, in their determination
of a reasonable profit/fee.
                          VT-I-13

-------
PROFIT/FEE OBJECTIVES ^fc\
1. MFP ON CONTftACT MO.
3.
2. CONTRACTOR
*.
COST INPUT TO TOTAL PERFORMANCE
COST CATEGORY
1
DIRECT
MATERIALS
EQUIPMENT
ENG.
trfFG.
PURCHASES
SUBCONTRACTS

PIRECT LABOR
OVERHEAD
DIRECT LABOR
OVERHEAD -
CONSULTANTS
OTHER DIRECT COSTS



GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE
: TOTAL
GOVERNMENT'S COST
OBJECTIVE
(MI
5












5
WEIGHT RANGE
t»
1% to 4fi
1% to 5%
IS to 2%
8% to 15%
6% to 9f.
5% to 9%
4% to 7%
23 to 55
1% to 3%

1

5% to sr.
ASSIGNED
*e&"r
%
S
r.
%
%
%
%
%
tfr
/*
%
%
%
«v
/•
^^^rr^^G^^-^:^-' I..-' • c:-
4. COMPOSITE PROF1T/FEE ON COST INPUT TO TOTAL PERFORMANCE (Col. (d) - Cat. (•))
5. COST RISK
S. PERFORMANCE
7. SELECTED
FACTORS
rft^ys^ ri^'i-*'" :.:;';-. 'I',-
...... /-•:,, • '-;;"."• .. " ,, • ,.-.. •....
;.sf.''^:r .''."•"'.' '••;'••-.. :^''vv^.v.:'r
0 to 6%
-2 to+2n

:" ,v:.;-:-;-: : "...-. --' [ •
•:''••:. '-"'... "-'
:•-•:".. -::-^'.--..:, • ' ••
TOTAL PROFIT/ FEE OBJECTIVES (Linmm 4 thru 7)
WEIGHTED PROFIT/ FEE
fC«i. tfa * (c»
3


*









S
P«O^lT/rEE O8JCCT1VE
r.
r. .
r«
r.
neuAMKs
•i
PBEPAREO BY (JV»m» mnd Title)
JiCNATU«E O*TE
EPA Fwm  1900.2(6.71)
                                                     VII-14

-------
REMEMBER
         PROFIT/FEE IS AN AMOUNT, NOT A PERCENTAGE

            Cost plus a percentage of cost is prohibited
            as a pricing arrangement.

         Profit/fee determinations do not include any
         proposed amount for cost of money.

            After the amount has been determined for
            profit/fee, it is reduced by the amount of
            allowable facilities capital cost of money
            proposed.
                          vn-15

-------

-------
-   FACILITIES CAPTIAL COST OF MONEY






 1.   Definition



 2.   Computation



 3.   History




 4.   EPA's Current Position



 5.   Contract Clauses



 6.   CPAF Contracts

-------

-------
           VIII.  FACILITIES CAPITAL COST OF MONEY
What is Cost of Money (COM)?

  0  COM is an imputed cost, not ah incurred cost,  determined
     by applying a COM rate to facilities capital employed
     in contract performance.

  0  COM is a cost allowed by the cost principles.   We use
     CAS 414 for guidance and the form on how to compute  the
     cost of money.

  0  The COM rate is computed, negotiated,  and applied like
     an indirect cost rate.  The COM will appear as an element
     of cost in the contractor's proposal.
                         VIII-1

-------
How is COM computed?



     Below is the form for computing cost of money.*
FAC1UT1ES CAPITAL
COST OF HONEY FACTORS COMPUTATION
VMMCS* IWT.


maun**
WIT
FACILITIES
CAPITAL

•WET
\
S4A CXf EMSE
POOLS

•ICOIBIO
LtMlB f*art*n
coiPflMi* a« «tou»
TOtU.
UHDItTIItUTtD
eUTWlUTID












TOTAL






















AOQK. •-


«.ta":«















pet «oe*

COCUMl
















oai.iimi













•AH »O*

.rrss.












/////////



• * •












initinn
    *(Found in CAS 414)
                           VIII-2

-------
                                                        CO
             •C O
              <1> C 4J
              JJ (0 <0
              us    c
              U OJ U
                 c
                 c
                 •1-1
                 4J 0)
              c  

(JJ
Ł
4-)

CO
•r-l

CO
JJ
0)
CO
CO
<Ł

r-i
(5
JJ
0

>1
^J
(0
JJ
CD
i-l
o
CD
CO

O
Ł
jj

>,
Ł

4-1
0)
CO

CO
•H

Ł
0
•1-1
• Ł
CD 3
3
i— 1 (1)
"3 JJ
> 10

"C
(1) 4J
4J (Q

c
•r-l

CO
•r4
Ł
E-


•

•c

0
Ł
JJ

CO
CO
CD


CO
JJ
0)
to
CO
rtj

•
^i
3
CO
(C
CD

g_l

*
tc
•
E
Jj
^'w
C
cc -c
(D
a c
•r-l -i-l
e
01
to
(0
cc

c
c
>l -H
,-1 4J
3 ro
« o
(C C
a> <—i
V4 i— i
E-K O
j_i
(U
JJ
CD
x;

a-
Ł-

r- 1
i— 1 «
fC CO
Ł 
-------
What is the background of CAS 414 as it pertains to EPA?
Standard 414 was issued by the Board effective October,
1976.  GSA added 414 to the FPR effective October, 1976.
However, GSA also issued Temporary Regulation 40 effective
the same date granting agencies the option whether to
recognize COM as an allowable cost.
EPA elected not to recognize COM, and withdrew applica-
bility of CAS 414.
In December of 1980, OFPP issued a policy letter (80-7)
providing recognition of COM but with a fee offset.  This
policy letter is the basis for today's option to offset COM
against profit or fee.  The policy letter by OFPP states...,
          "Agencies shall ensure that contractors are
     not compensated for facilities capital cost of
     money both as a direct or indirect cost and in
     profit or fee.  Before the allowability of
     facilities capital cost of money, this cost was
     included in profits or fees.  Therefore, profit
     and fee prenegotiation objectives shall he reduced
     if necessary to reflect this refinement in cost
     accounting practices.  This reduction may be
     accomplished by means of offsets; that is, by
     (i) using a dollar-for-dollar offset in the
     Government's prenegotiation profit or fee objectives
     or (ii) incorporating a common offset factor under
     an agency's structured approach."

In May of 1981, GSA issued Temporary Regulation 61
incorporating the OFPP policy into FPR and later amended FPR
codifying the temporary regulation.  This took away the
option of whether to recognize COM or not, but gave EPA the
right to offset any claimed' COM against fee or profit.
                          VIII-4

-------
what is EPA's current position on COM?
•(1)  COM is an offset to profit.

 (2)  The contracting officer is responsible for assuring
     that the proper notices are put into the solicitation
     package and that the proper clause is included in the
     contract.

 (3)  Every contractor is eligible to claim COM whether
     the contract is subject to CAS or not.  Cost of
     Money is allowable under the cost principles.

 (4)  How the contractor responds determines whether the
     COM waiver clause goes in the contract or not.  It
     is the contracting officer's responsibility to assure
     that the proper notices are in the solicitation package
     and that the proper clause is included in the contract,

     -  If the contractor does not propose Capital Cost of
        Money, FAR clause 52.215-31 which waives the right
        to claim COM should be inserted in the contract.

        If the contractor requests COM, then the contracting
        officer's responsibility is to not include the COM
        waiver clause but to use the amount of COM proposed
        as an offset to profit.

     -  The cost analysis report will inform the contracting
        officer of whether COM has/has not been proposed.
                          VIII-5

-------
What is the proper clause under FAR and how does it differ
from the FPR?

Following are the COM clauses under both the FAR and FPR:

            Solicitation Notice - IFPR 1-3,808-5]

               Facilities Capital Post of Money

Facilities capital cost of money (see FPR §l-15.205-51(a))
will be an allowable cost under the contemplated contract but
only if the contractor specifically identifies or proposes  it
in the cost proposal for the contract and elects to claim this
cost by checking the appropriate box below.   If the contractor
does not specifically identify or propose facilities capital
cost of money and does not elect to claim this cost,  the
contract will include the Waiver of Facilities Capital Cost of
Money clause.

      	/  The prospective contractor has specifically
            identified or proposed facilities capital cost
            of money in its cost proposal and elects to
            claim this cost as an allowable cost under the
            contract.

      	/  The prospective contractor has not specifically
            identified or proposed facilities capital cost
            of money in its cost proposal and elects not to
            claim this cost as an allowable cost under the
            contract.
       Waiver of Facilities Capital Cost of Money -  FPR

The contractor is aware that facilities capital cost of money
is an allowable cost but waives the right to claim it under
this contract.

                          {End of clause)
                          VIII-6

-------
             Solicitation Notice -  [FAR 52.215-30]

               Facilities Capital Cost of Money
      (a)   Facilities capital cost of money will be an allowable
 cost  under  the contemplated contract, but only if the prospec-
 tive  contractor elects to claim it below.  If the prospective
 contractor  elects to claim this cost, the Waiver of Facilities
.Capital Cost of Money will be excluded from the contract.  If
 the prospective contractor does not elect to claim this cost,
 the contract will include the Waiver of Facilities Capital Cost
 of Money.

      (b)   By including an item of proposed allowable cost in
 response to the solicitation, the prospective contractor will
 be deemed  to have elected to claim facilities capital cost
 of money.

                       (End of clause)
 Waiver of Facilities Capital Cost of Money - [FAR 52.215-311
     If the contractor
of money as a proposed
the contractor
        did not include facilities capital  cost
        allowable cost, it shall be deemed  that
waived the right to claim it under this contract,
                       (End of clause)
                         VIII-7

-------
As was mentioned earlier, any claim by the contractor for
FCCOM is offset against fee or profit.  EPAAR 1515.970-2
evaluates further:
[EPAAR 1515.970-2]  EPA Structured System
     (a)(l) Profit Factors.  The factors set forth below
and the weighted ranges listed after each factor shall be
used in all instances where the profit is to be specifically
negotiated.

        (2)  The Contracting officer shall first measure the
"Contractor's Input to Total Performance" by the assignment
of a profit percentage within the designated weight ranges
to each element of contract cost recognized by the Contracting
Officer.  Such costs are multiplied by the specific percentages
to arrive at specific dollar profits.  The amount calculated
forfacilitiescapital cost of money shall not be included as
part of the cost basefor computation of profit or fee.  A
complete discussion of how facilities capital cost of money
is determined and how it is applied and administered is set
forth in FAR 31.205-10.

        (3)  After computing a total dollar profit for the
Contractor's Input to Total Performance, the Contracting
Officer shall calculate the specific profit dollars assigned
for cost risk and performance.  This is accomplished by multi-
plying the total Government cost objective, exclusive of any
facilities capital cost of money, by the specific weight
assigned to cost risk and performance.  The Contracting Officer
shall then determine the profit or fee objective by adding the
total profit dollars for the Contractor's Input to Total
Performance to the specific dollar profits assigned to cost
risk and performance.  The profit of fee objective shall then
be reduced by an amount equal to the amount of facilities
capital cost of money allowed.  EPA Form 1900-2 shall be used
to facilitate the calculation of this profit or fee objective.
                                                                 i)
                          VIII-8

-------
How is the offset determined on a CPAF contract?
The proposed revision to EPAAR 1515.903, Contract^inc^ J3f f i ce r
Responsibilities, reads as follows:

     "(b)  When facilities capital cost of money is
     included as an item of cost in the Contractor's
     proposal, the Contracting Officer shall reduce
     the profit or fee objective by an amount equal
     to the amount of facilities capital cost of
     money allowed.  For cost-plus-award-fee contracts,
     the Contracting Officer will make the reduction
     in the combined base and award pool amount."


When final rule on the revision is published, the Cost Analysis
Guide will be revised to incorporate the complete revision to
EPAAR 1515.903.
                             VIII-9

-------
In summary,  when cost of money is proposed,  your decision
will be based on the following:
             Facilities Capital Cost of Money
     Is Cost of Money proposed
     as an element of cost?
                        NO
 Insert Waiver Clause
_at FPP 1-3.808-5
         or
   FAR 52.215-31
               YES
     1.  Do not use waiver clause
     2.  Determine amount proposed
     3.  Offset COM proposed dollar-for-dollar against
         profit in making Weighted Guidelines computation
                          viii-in
                                                                 H

-------
                   IX.  FAIR AND REASONABLE
The total cost of a contract is the sum of the allowable
direct and  indirect costs allocable to the contractf incurred
or to be incurred, less any allocable credits, plus any
allocable cost of money pursuant to 31.205-10.   [FAR 31.201-1)
A cost is considered allowable if it:
     (1)  Is reasonable
     (2)  Is allocable
     (3)  Meets the standards of generally accepted
          accounting principles and practices
     (4)  Is within the terms of the contract
     (5)  Is within the limitations of FAR Part 31
Of the conditions set forth above, reasonableness has
the broadest range of interpretation and it is this topic
which will be discussed in this section.
                             IX-1

-------
r
              Under the "general" cost principle for reasonableness
              [FAR 31-201-3], the following is given as an overall
              definition of "reasonableness":

                   "A cost  is reasonable if, in its nature and
                   amount,  it does not -exceed that which would
                   be incurred by a prudent person in the conduct
                   of competitive business.  Reasonableness of
                   specific costs must be examined with particular
                   care in  connection with firms or their separate
                   divisions that may not be subject to effective
                   competitive restraints.  What is reasonable
                   depends  upon a variety of considerations and
                   circumstances involving both the nature and
                   amount of the cost in question.  In determining
                   the reasonableness of a specific cost, the
                   contracting officer shall consider:

                        (a)  Whether it is the type of cost
                             generally recognized as ordinary
                             and necessary for the conduct of
                             the contractor's business or the
                             contract performance;

                        (b)  The restraints or requirements
                             imposed by such factors as
                             generally accepted sound business
                             practices, arm's-length bargaining,
                             Federal and State laws and regula-
                             tions, and contract terms and
                             specifications;

                        (c)  The action that a prudent business
                             person, considering responsibilities
                             to the owners of the business, em-
                             ployees, customers, the Government,
                             and the public at large, would take
                             under the circumstances; and

                        (d)  Any significant deviations from
                             the established practices of the
                             contractor that may unjustifiably
                             increase the contract costs.
                                            IX-2

-------
The above quotation does not clearly define the criteria
for cost allowability based on reasonableness.  What it does
indicate is that the nature and the amount must both be
considered in the context of the particular circumstances
surrounding the cost.

The FAR describes four areas to consider when determing
reasonableness.

First, the cost principle indicates that it should be
determined whether "the cost is of a type generally recognized
as ordinary and necessary for the conduct of the contractor's
business or the performance of the contract." \f

Second, the cost principle .dictates consideration of
"restraints or requirements imposed by such factors as
generally accepted sound business practices, arm's length
bargaining, Federal and State laws and regulations, and
contract terms and specifications...." 2/

Third, the contractor's action in incurring a cost is to be
compared with "the action that a prudent businessman would
take in the circumstances, considering the responsibilities
to the owners of the business, the employees, the customers,
the Government and the public at large...." _3/

Fourth, the cost principle directs the consideration of
significant "deviations from the established practices of
the contractor which may unjustifiably increase the contract
costs..." 4/
V FAR 31.201-3(a)
2/ FAR 31.201-3(b)
3/ FAR 31.201-3(c)
4/ FAR 31.201-3(d)
                             IX-3

-------
What factors should be considered in assessing the nature
of a cost?
     o  Examine whether there was a valid basis for
        incurring the cost to obtain the desired end.

           normal business objectives alone are not
           a sufficient basis

     o  Examine whether the cost is within Government
        contract policies (i.e., cost principles).
What factors should be considered in assessing a reasonable
amount?

     o  Assess whether the benefit derived from the cost
        is commensurate with the amount expended by
        comparing

        -  the costs of other contractors in the
           industry

           the cost of other contractors in the same
           geographical area

        -  the contractor's cost in prior years

           the costs of other vendors of the same
           product or service.

     o  When comparing a particular cost, make sure the
        comparison is VALID.

     o  When challenging the reasonableness of an amount
        of the contractor's cost, the Government cannot
        rely upon an abstract number or percentage, but
        must demonstrate in what way the cost is excessive.
                            IX-4

-------
IX.  FAIR AND REASONABLE






     1.  Definition




     2.  Main Factors to Consider




     3.  Other Considerations

-------

-------
ABSCA 12292, 10 G.C. 
-------
     It is recognized that the amount of an expense
     will vary as circumstances change.  Usually high
     costs may be necessary where urgency is present or
     where no alternative sources are available.  Indeed,
     there are innumerable events and conditions which
     could justify the expenditure of greater amounts.
     Accordingly, any examination of the reasonableness
     of the amount of a cost must examine the particular
     circumstances that prevailed.  Absent that examina-
     tion, there is little basis for questioning the
     reasonableness of amounts that were expended." I/
     I/  Melvin Rishe, Government Contract Costs (Washington
DC:Federal Publications, Inc., First Ed. 1984), p.  10-7.

                           IX-6

-------
What other considerations are there in determining a fair
and reasonable amount?
        When contractors incur an ordinary and necessary
        business cost, the Government generally has t"he
        burden of demonstrating why the cost is not
        reasonable.  Moreover, if a cost is ordinary and
        necessary, the Government is generally on notice
        of the cost.   The Government has some responsibility
        to challenge  a cost before it is incurred.

        Costs which may be attributable to mistakes and
        oversights can be considered reasonable as being
        ordinary and  necessary business costs.   The
        rationale being that some mistakes in business
        are unanticipated or unavoidable, and to disallow
        such costs would unjustly punish a contractor.
        (See General  Dynamics Corp., ABSCA 5166, et. al.,
        2 G.C. 11247,  60-1 BCA 112556)

           obvious, frequent mistakes may be considered
           unreasonable

        The existence of an established practice places
        the Government on notice of the cost and failure
        to object to  the cost's incurrence implies
        approval.

        -  While the  existence of an established cost
           practice does not ensure the reasonableness
           of a cost, and the absence of an established
           practice does not indicate a cost's  unreason-
           ableness,  where a practice does exist,
           contractor deviations from the practice may
           make the costs highly suspect.  This can be
           seen in Aro, Inc., ASBCA 13623, et al., 69-2
           BCA 117868.  The contractor in this case had
           granted administrative leave to four employees
           to enable  them to compete in a golf  tournament.
           These costs were then claimed as employee
           fringe benefit costs allocable to Government
           contracts.  It was found, however, that the
           contractor's administrative leave policy did
           not list this situation as one for which
           employee leave was permissible.  Therefore, the
           costs were disallowed as having been unreason-
           ably incurred.
                             IX-7

-------
     o  When costs are incurred pursuant to an established
        practice, the reasonableness of the cost will be
        judged according to

           the overall reasonableness of the practice

           the particular circumstances attendant to
           the cost incurrence

     o  If the Government contests reasonableness, it has
        the burden of proof of justifying its position.

The above is not a complete list of considerations in a
fair and reasonableness determination; however, it should
highlight some of the more frequent occurrences.

For further guidance on this issue, consult your cost
advisory section and/or legal counsel.
                           IX-8

-------
           X.  THE IMPORTANCE OF DOCUMENTATION
A thorough cost or price analysis is not complete without
written documentation of the steps performed and the
conclusions reached.
A written record provides:

        the basis for the conclusions reached
        and the basis for the prenegotiation plan
        a permanent record for future reference
THEREFORE, support your cost or price analysis conclusions
with WRITTEN DOCUMENTATION to the files.
                           X-l

-------
What is considered adequate documentation?


Adequate documentation tells

          o  How

          o  When

          o  Why

          o  Who

of a cost or price analysis decision.




HOW was the analysis performed?

             desk review
             assist audit
             cost analysis
          -  price analysis
          -  item by item or selected review




WHEN was the review conducted and was assistance requested?
WHY was"the selected information used or not used in the
     analysis; and why were the decisions accepted which
     are the basis for the conclusions reached?
WHO was contacted as a knowledgeable source to verify
     information in the cost/price proposal (note: name,
     job title, day, time, etc.)?
Documentation is not limited to providing the answers
to these questions.  Documentation should include all the
information necessary for someone else to understand the
basis of the conclusions reached.
                            X-2

-------
fl
          XT.  EPA FINANCIAL ANALYSIS SECTION
                Functions
f-
 - Financial tfonitoring
 - contractor Purchasing System Reviews (GPRS)
 - Final Audits
 - Ad Hoc Contract Management Assistance
 - Audit Resolution Coordination for PCMD
Review results will lead to:
 - Increased compliance with Contract
 - Improvements to contractor Accounting and Purchasing Systems
 - Basis for improved Contract Policies and Procedures
 - Timely Audit Resolution
 - Final Settlement of Contract Costs
 - Reduce Contract Costs
 - Inproved Management of EPA Contracts
                                      XT
           (8/90)

-------
f)

-------
                          FINANCIAL MUEIORING

              Contracts Greater than Five Million Dollars

Financial MDnitoring is a review of contractor billings to ensure
compliance with contract requirements and to ensure billed costs are
adequately supported by appropriate systems and records.
We analyze the systems and contract costs incurred to date, and based
on this analysis make determinations about incurred and future costs.
To be eligible for review, EPA established a contract value threshold
of $5,000,000 (potential cost and fee assuming all options are exercised)
for active cost price contracts.  This guide is oriented towards reviews
of cost-type contracts valued in excess of five million dollars.

The financial monitoring review is not an incurred cost audit.  It is
not the objective of this review to determine the allowability of costs
incurred.  An incurred cost audit will be performed based on a separate
interim direct cost audit requested after completion of the financial
monitoring review.

Financial monitoring reviews should be scheduled for each appropriate
contract after at least 6 months of performance has been completed.
Reviews should be scheduled with the objective of reviewing each
contract at least once every two years of performance thereafter.
                                    XJ-1
(8/90)

-------

-------
                    BACKGROUND DATA FOR POST AWARD AUDIT
                               CONTRACT BRIEF
                                                   ASSGN. NO.

         Number:	       	

RFP Number:                    	

Contractor's  Name/Phone  #:	,	

Contractor's  Address:          	_	.	___	




Contractor's  Contact:



Contract Adm. /Special 1st:	
   (Include Phone  Nos.)



Program Hgr.'s Name & No.:     	'	

Pro j . Officer's Name  & No.:    __  	 	

                               .._	_	

            Off.'s Name  & No:	



Performance Period:

     Eff. Date of Contract:    		;	

     Basic Contract:           	


     Dot i ons:                  	








Type of Contract:              	
     of CAS Coverage:
   a} Ful1 or Modified
  (b) N/A. Small Bus. Concern
                                   E-i

-------
                    BACKGROUND DATA FOR POST AWARD  AUDIT
                               CONTRACT BRIEF
Contract Amount w/mods.:
     Base Amount:

     Option Amounts:
     Total Contract:

Type of Services:
Qth.er_.Pe.rtj^nen t__ Con tractT. SJTJPS.
(1) Any Pre-Contract  Costs Allowed?  Advanced  Agreements?
(2) Any Related  Party  Affiliations?
(3) Did  the Prime  Contractor certify to Cost  or  Pricina Data?
(4) Any special  Public Voucher terms?
I I.SUBCONTRACTORS:
Approved/Authorized
  	Subcontractors
Participation
* Amount    '/.
  Subcontractor(s)  Regu i.r_ed _.to	
                       Provide
                     Certificate
                      of  Current
     Submit       Cost or Pricing
Progress Reports    Data  to Prime
                         Applicable Contract  Clause
(1) Subcontracts:
                                    E-l
                                   Pane  2

-------
                   BACKGROUND DATA FOR POST AWARD AUDIT
                              CONTRACT BRIEF

                        Applicable Contract Clause

             Costs:
(3)  Direct Labor:

    (a)  LOE



    (b>  Key Personnel




    (c)



    (d)



(4)  Other Direct Costs

     a)  Consultants



    (b*  Overtime



    (c)  Equipment



    (d)  Printing




    (e)  Travel



    (f )
    (a
                                   E-l
                                  Paae  3

-------
                   BACKGROUND  DATA FOR POST AWARD AUDIT
                              CONTRACT BRIEF

                        Applicable Contract Clause
(8)  Other Items:

                                   E-l
                                  Pace 4

-------
CT7ELINE FOR PRE-REVIEW DISCUSSION WTffi THE CO/PO

FINANCIAL 10JITGRING REVIEW

COOTRACTOR	
CONTRACT NUMBER
PURPOSE OF REVIEW:
PRELIMINARY STEPS
A Financial MDnitoring Review of contracts over
$5 million to determine if the contractor is billing
actual costs incurred IAW the contract specifications.
     1.  Inform the contractor of our review
     2.  Prepare and engagement letter
     3.  Hold and entrance conference with
         i.  EPA Contracts Personnel
        ii.  Subject contractor
AUDIT STEPS
     1.  Review contract files
         i.  contract
        ii.  Modifications
       iii.  Summary of Negotiations
        iv.  BAFO
         v.  Technical Evaluation
        vi.  Pre-award Cost Advisory Reports

     2.  Review Monthly Reports
         i.  Financial Management
        ii.  Progress Reports
       iii.  Current Status

     3.  Review of Internal Controls

     4.  Review and Analyze the Billing System

     5.  Review Direct Costs
         i.  Direct Labor
        ii.  Subcontract Costs
       iii.  Other Direct Costs

     6.  Review Indirect Costs
         i.  Trace Pool and Base Costs to Books
        ii.  Verify ceiling, if applicable

     7.  Review Contractor's Management of the Contract
         i.  Evaluate variances between Budget vs. Actual
        ii.  Cost-to-Complete Estimates

     8.  Summarize results of our review
         i.  Summarize wor]
-------

-------
                            war
LJ5EMD
* - PRIORITY REVIEW
E - ERCS only   .
A - ARCS only
                                             Signature and Date
                                             SECTION CHIEF APPROVAL
                      ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY
                         FINANCIAL ANALYSIS  SECTION
                     FINANCIAL  FIQNITQRING  REVIEW PROGRAM
CONTRACTOR NAME

CONTRACT' «

CONTRACT PROGRAM  (ARCS, ERCS, TES  and  etc.)

AUDIT ASSIGNMENT  tt  	_	_.	_	_..._	

AUDITORS 3)
AUDIT OBJECTIVE?
   I ^   Review the Contract File  including  specific:  contract terms „  prepare a
        contract, brief, preaward  notes,  technical  and  BAFO  proposal.
 II.
III.
 I",
 VI,
'"'II
        Perform Preliminary Review Steps  by  reviewing  the  monthly progress
        reports, financial management  reports  and  the  contractor's financial
        statements.  Determine  if the  contractor  had or  will  have a CPSR and A
        F r o p e r t y / E a u i p AI e n t Compliance  R e view ,

        Review contractors intern?.!  controls  to determine  the amount of sub-
        stantive testi.no necessary to  render  an opinion  on the billing  systeis.
        Review of Billing and Accountino Systems.
        A.  Review con tractor s billing system  to determine  if  public vouchers
              e accurate, complete and timely  as required  by  the contract.:
        B.   Review contractors cost accounting  system  to  determine  if it is
            s u 'f f i c i >"•:•; n t t o a t: c u r a t e 1 y = e cj r o a a t e ,  a c c u m u 1 a t e  and  r e p o r t, i: h v
            c o n t r a c t o r ' s a c t u a 1 c o s t s i n c u. r r e d .

        Review direct costs charoed to the contract to determine if they
        are allowable, allocable. and reasonable, (i.e.  labor,  subs and ODC's)

        Review indirect,  costs to determine if  they are properly allocated
        to  the contract  (i.e, Overhead and O&A)

        Review the contractor's management of  the contract,

        A.  Review established reports (monthly  progress  reports,  public
           vouchers, etc.) to determine if they  adequately  provide  all  dita
           relevant to the review of financial  progress  under  the contract.

        B.  Review contractor's cost-to complete  estimates

        C.  Review cost- to-complete estimate analysis of  remaining work  to be
           performed and determine how uncommitted costs  and  remaining  labor
           h o u r s a r e «n o n i t o r e d .

        D .,  Evaluate variances between budget and  actual  performance.

        Ł„  Ensure the contractor has adequate written  policies  and  procedures
           •!• .-. ,u c: --. 1 ? f o v r. ..v -. n >': "• f : 1 '• •• '• r •" s ' r " t v"  c* e t "i i" -i t w *" r« f  ('" •"• ^ '!' ^ ^ "''  " n • Vj n 1. »•••) •!•. i. •"'; T< .

-------
                                                                    Paoe 2
VIII.   Summarize results and recoannend improvements  to  contract financial
        progress.

  IX.   Draft and Issue the financial monitoring report.

   X.   Draft specific requests for an interim audit.

  XI..   Plan for Follow-Up review.

 XII.   Follow-up response to advisory report.

-------
UI/P     AUDITOR'S
REF     INITIALS   DATE
                             I. Background Review

                                1 <,   Review Contract Files
                                    a.  Name of Contractor
                                    b.  Address of contractor
                                    c.  TeleDhone No.  and Person of Contract
                                    d.  Type of Contract
                                    e.  Contract Term and Option Period ($)
                                    f.  Contractor's CAS coverage
                                    a.  Is contractor a small business
                                    h.  Determine if contractor certified
                                        to cost or pricing data

                                2.   Review the Preaward Audit Reports
                                    s. Cost Advisory Reports
                                    b. DCAA Audit Reports
                                       Review the Preaward Audit and Cost
                                       Advisory  Reports to determine if the
                                       contractor's accounting system is
                                       adequate and the system is reliable.

                                3.   Review the BAFO

                                4.   Review the Technical Evaluation

                                5.   Review the Summary of Negotiations

                                6,   Review the Award/Contract
                                    Review for specific and/or pertinent
                                    clauses that may have a significant impact
                                    on the contract.

                                7.   Prepare A summary  of the contract
                                    modifications

                              * 8.   Determine if there? are ore-con tract costs
                                    and if so, if there is an advance
                                    agreement

                                ?.   For HODS with Cost Impacts such as
                                    Novation Agreements, Indirect Cost
                                    Changes, Reorganizations, Accounting
                                    System Changes, Pre-Contract Costs, etc.,
                                    verify whether;
                                    A.  The contractor provided adequate cost
                                        impact analysis
                                    B.,  There was timely negotiation before
                                        costs were actually incurred

-------
W/P
5'EF
AUDITOR'S
INITIALS-.
DATE
Page 4

                               .10,  Discuss the contract with the Project
                                    Officer (those aspects for which he/she
                                    is responsible)
                                    a.  Obtain any ideas or issues of
                                        concern to him/her and add audit steps
                                        as necessary.
                                    b.  Discuss prior auditor's findings with
                                        comments on how they may best be
                                        resolved
                                    c.  Discuss budget, monthly progress
                                        report, financial status report,
                                        estimates to complete suspensions
                                        and/or disallowances, transfers or
                                        deobligations and transfers

                               11.  Obtain a Dun & Bradstreet Report,
                                    Identify and evaluate all related party
                                    affiliations.

                                    Obtain copies of cognizant auditor's
                                    (DCAA, DHHS, DOE, etc.) reports on areas
                                    such as:
                                    a. Accounting System Reviews
                                    b. Estimating System Reviews
                                    c. Procurement System Reviews
                                    d. Cost Accounting System (CAS) Compliance
                                       Reviews
                                    9. Floorchecks (Time Reporting Reviews?
                                    f. Final and Interim'cost audits
                               13.  Review EPA files/discuss with soecialist
                                    other relevent issues including:
                                    a. Previous Financial Monitoring
                                    b. Indirect Cost Rate Agreements
                                    c. CPSR Reviews
                                    d. Property Reviews
                                    e. Conflict of Interest Reviews
                                                             Reoorts
                                    Send engagement letter requesting
                                    information from the contractor
                                    Hold Entrance conference with the
                                    Contracting Officer and Contract
                                    Specialist.
                                    Obtain a list of their concerns and add
                                    audit steps as necessary.

-------
wVP
REF
AUDITOR ';
INITIALS
DATE
                            II, P re1i mi n ar y Review S teps

                                1.  Review the following report;;:
                                    a.  Monthly Reports
                                    b,  Quarterly Reports
                                    c.  Interim Reports
                                    d.  Financial/Contract Management Reports
                                    e.  Individual Work Assignment/Delivery
                                        Order Status Reports
                                    f.  Actual Costs Incurred on Contract
                                        compared to Budgeted Costs
                                    '.:!,.  Executive Summary Report
                                    h.  Regional Summary Report

                                2.  Determine if the contractor had or will
                                    have a Contract Purchasing System Review
                                    by EPA or DCAA: determine if approved.

                                3,  Determine if the Contractor had or will
                                    have a Property/Equipment Compliance
                                    Review and obtain  copy of most recant
                                    report

                                4.  Review Prior Financial itonitorina Reports

                                "5,  Discuss contractor issues with Financial
                                    A d fli i n i s t r a t i v e Con tr a ct i na Of f i eer (F AC 0).
                                6.   Be aware of evidence of Conflict of
                                    Interest
                                    A,  Review list of all clients
                                    B.  Determine if the contractor is working
                                        for s e v e r a 1 c u st o me r s si mu11 a n e ou s1v
                                    C.  Review Dun & Bradstreet Reports for
                                        affiliates.
                                7,   Prepare the Audit Program based on
                                    Preliminary review to highlight
                                    significant review areas and steps
                                    planned.

                                8.,   Obtain  Section Chief approval of audit
                                    review  program.

-------
W/P     AUDITOR'S  ,
REE     INITIALS   DATE                                              Page 6
                           HI. Review of Internal Controls

                                 * 1.  Obtain a copy of most recent Certified
                                       Financial Statements;
                                       a.  Review CPA's opinion.
                                       b.  Alert C,0. to adverse changes
                                           in contractor's financial position.
                                       c.  Determine if CPA commented on
                                           internal controls.

                                *  2,  Review EPA and DCAA audit reports to
                                       determine what reliance  can be placed
                                       on the contractor's internal controls,

                                   3,.  Determine if the contractor has
                                       established procedures to safequard its
                                       assets, and check the accuracy and
                                       reliability of its accountinq data.

                                   4.  Review contractor's written policies
                                       and procedures
                                       A. Timekeeping
                                       8., Travel
                                       C. Subcontracting

                                   3.  Review pertinent Internal Audit Reports


-------
W/P
REF
AUDITOR'S
INITIALS
DATE
Paoe 7
                                 Review of Billina and Accounting System

                                 1.  Compare bills to contract
                                     terms/ conditions
                                     a.  Determine if bills exceed any
                                         Contract Ceilings (i.e. Labor rates,
                                         QDC's. Overhead. G&A and Fees)
                                     b.  Determine compliance with Hu.lti.ole
                                         appropriation/account requirement*
                                     c.  Determine if Compliance with
                                         invoicing provisions

                                 2.  Obtain copies of contractor's bill;
                                     (Public Vouchers)
                                     a.  Summarize all bills by cost element
                                     b.  Determine how frequently bills are
                                         submitted
                                     c.  Determine if fees are charged at
                                         contractual rates and applied to
                                         correct cost base
                                 3.   Trace billings to contractor's
                                     accounting records
                                 4.   Determine if Contractor's accounting
                                     system is sufficient to accumulate,,
                                     segregate and report the contractor's
                                     actual costs incurred for the contract
                                     in total as well as by UA or DO

                                 5.   Review Journal Entries to determine if
                                     cost is being transferred between
                                     contracts,  work assignments, delivery-
                                     orders, etc.  If so, determine why?

                                 6.   Determine what procedures are used to
                                     monitor when 75?: of the contract
                                     ceiling has been reached.
                                     Determine if there is an established
                                     system to correctly accumulate and bill
                                     site specific costs in accordance with
                                     contract requirements.

-------
W/P     AUDITOR'S
REF     INITIALS...  DATE.                                              Paae 8
                            IV,  Review of Billing and Accounting System
                                 (continued)

                                 3.  Determine if costs are being charged  to
                                     the correct W/A or D/0
                                     A.  Check for authorization of
                                         expenditures billed and oroof  in
                                         file
                                     B-  Review system to determine
                                         capability of identifying
                                         charges by U/A or D/0
                                     C.  Review the actual start date of
                                         charges to WAs or D/Os compared to
                                         Effective dates per contract

                                 ?.  Determine (from Billirtqs, P.O. Comments,
                                     or Questions to Contractor) whether there
                                     is or whether there has been a history of
                                     suspended or disallowed billinos and
                                     current status.

                                10.  Compare billed costs to estimated
                                     contract costs to determine
                                     a.  Whether there may be excess funds
                                         that could be deobliqated or
                                         transferred from one cost element
                                         to another
                                     b.  Whether the contractor has or  may
                                         overrun the contract
                                     c.  Compute dollar values

-------
REF
AUDITOR'S
INITIALS
DATE
Facie 9
                                Review of Direct Contract Costs.

                                A. Review of Labor Charaes*

                                   1.  Obtain and review copy of contractor's
                                       written time reporting policy,

                                   2,  Is the time reoortinq function
                                       separated from the personnel and
                                       payroll functions?
                                       a.  Who fills out the time sheet?
                                       b.  Who signs the time sheet?
                                       c.  Who approves time charged
                                       d.  Does time sheet contain the detail
                                     ,     necessary to allocate the labor
                                           costs to A contract, a work site,
                                           and multiple appropriations
                                           accounts .
                           3.   For several months of
                               direct labor costs to
                               and time sheets,.
                                                             bills, trace all
                                                             payroll records
                                       a.  Determine if labor charges are
                                          properly supported.
                                       b.  Determine if all labor charges are
                                          allowable,  allocable, and
                                          reasonable.
                                       c.  Determine if the labor charaes were
                                                     on the contract.
                                                     categories were
                                                      clean-up tech as
                                          for work performed
                                       d.  Determine if labor
                                          cross charged (i.e
                                          a chemist) .
                                       e.  Determine if cross charging has any
                                          dollar impact on the contract.
                                       f.  Verify that  employees charged meet
                                          educational  and experience
                                          requirements for categories charged.

                                       Compare time records to key personnel
                                       clause in contract.  Make sure key
                                       personnel are  being used to perform
                                       as  required by  contract.

                                       Review overtime charaes to determine if
                                       they are allowable under the contract
                                       a.  Determine contractor's written
                                          policy for authorizing overtime

-------
W/P     AUDITOR'S
        INITIALS,.  DATE                                              Pane  10
                             V. Review of Direct Contract Costs

                                A. Review of Labor Charges  (continued)

                                   ?>.,  b.  Determine  if  the overtime  charged •
                                           on the sample of time sheets was
                                           properly authorized.

                                       c'.  Determine  whether unpaid overtime
                                           is regularly worked and how it  is
                                           accounted  for.

                                   6,  Determine the  contractor's  actual wage
                                       experience
                                       a.  Obtain copies of any written
                                           policies
                                       b.  Based on the  contractor's  written
                                           or verbal  DO! icy, and available
                                           i n f o r ma t i on ,  c om pu te t he
                                           contractor's wage escalation and
                                                   to  proposed values*

                                   7,  Determine whether management effort is
                                       being charoed consistently with  the
                                       BAFO (Direct or indirect and function*
                                       title, and Quantity of hours charged)

                                   8.,  Determine that Direct labor charaes are
                                       for employees rather than consultants
                                       or sub-contractors

                                   9.  If LOE type contract, determine  actual
                                       LOE and compare to contract to see if
                                       fee adjustment is applicable. Assure
                                       that contractor is computing and
                                       reporting actual LOE correctly.

                                  10.  Test whether the contractor is
                                       performing unauthorized work
                                       A.  Test timing of work performed is
                                           covered by Period of Performance
                                       B.  Be alert to services provided
                                           which are properly authorized in
                                           the Statement of Work
                                             If it appears that the work was
                                           not authorized by the contracting
                                           officer, try to determine if it was
                                           authorized by someone else.

-------
W/P
REF
AUDITOR'S
INITIALS
DATE
Psae 11
                                 B. Review of Subcontractor's Caste
                                       Review contract file' and
                                       subcontractors.
                                                        list
                                       Obtain a cooy of the contractor's
                                       written Subcontracting procedures,
                                       a.  Does the Prime monitor the
                                           performance of the subcontractor
                                       b.  Does the Prime require progress
                                           reports of the subcontractor
                                       c.  Did the subcontractor provide a
                                           Certificate of Current Cost or
                                           Pricing Data to the Prime
                                       d.  Determine if the Subcontract Plan
                                           is included in the contract as
                                           required by FAR,  flake a Copy for
                                           the audit file.

                                       Determine the actual dollar
                                       participation of each subcontractor.
                                       Cornea re the inception to date
                                       experience with the contractual
                                       limitations.
                                 * 4.   Determine whether subcontractors have
                                       been properly approved or appropriate
                                       notifications have been made in
                                       accordance with the terms of the
                                       contract.
                                 # 5,   Verify that any indirect costs or
                                       profit/fee allocated by the prime
                                       contractor to subcontractor costs is
                                       allocable and in accordance with
                                       contract provisions.

                                 "* 6.   Determine whether the prime contractor
                                       procedures for determination of
                                       accurate and reasonable subcontractor
                                       accounting systems and billings are
                                       adequate and routinely followed.
                                       Review the subcontractor's billinas
                                       (invoices) to determine if they are
                                       adequate in detail to monitor.''identify
                                       a.  any ceiling costs (ODC etc.)
                                       b.  Indirect rates
                                       c.  Specific cost elements (D/L. etc,)
                                       d.  LOE data

-------
W/P
BEF
AUDITOR'S
INITIALS
DATE
Paoe 12
                                   3.  Does the contractor (if larqe business)
                                       submit invoices for payment before
                                       paying its own subcontractors?
                                       a.  Quantify, if applicable
                                       b.  Calculate lost interest
                                       •:.  Have Contractor provide schedules
                                           which indicate the date costs were
                                           i.  Pilled by prime to EPA
                                          ii.  Paid by prime to subcontractor
                                         iii*  Paid by EPA to prime contractor

                                  * 9.  Are subcontractor's applied indirect
                                        rates acceptable?

                                   10,  Determine how any fixed laboratory
                                        rates are established for
                                        subcon tractors.

-------
W/P
REF
AUDITOR'S
INITIALS
DATE
13
                                C, Review of Other Direct Costs
                                       Review contract file to determine if
                                       there are any contractual ceilings
                                       placed on the ODC's.  Determine
                                       cumulative amounts invoiced bv cost
                                       element.
                                 * 2.  Trace sample of the QDC billings to the
                                       contractors accounts payable records
                                       and invoices.
                                       a.  Determine if all QDCs are actual.
                                           necessary and reasonable.
                                       b.  Determine if any expenses that
                                           should have been charged indirectly
                                           were charged as QDC expenses.
                                       c.  Determine if any contractual
                                           ceilings have been exceeded or are
                                           likely to be exceeded before
                                           completion of the contract,

                                 * 3,  Trace a =amDie of travel vouchers
                                       a«  Obtain copy of contractor's written
                                           travel procedures.
                                       b.  Determine if the sample travel
                                           expenses reviewed comply with
                                           contractual limitations, the
                                          .contractor's written policies and
                                           the GTR.
                                 * 3.   Determine whether subcontractor fee has
                                       been billed in accordance with the
                                       contract.

                                 * 5.   Review direct purchases of supplies,
                                       materials, equipment, etc. to determine
                                       whether property has been purchased and
                                       properly approved under the contract.

                                 * 6.   Determine if computer charges are
                                       billed at actual rates: if not, are
                                       the estimated rates adjusted  to
                                       actuals.  If so, How and when9  Are
                                       over/under absorbed costs allocated
                                      •to cost ob.iectives properiy?
                                         Have the contractor provide
                                       su.pportinq data  for all formulas  and
                                       adjustments made,.

-------
?:EF
AUDITOR'S
INITIALS
DATE
Paoe
                                 * 7
                               Review Equipment Usage/Rental rates and
                               determine how the costs *re  priced?
                               Obtain adequate support from the
                               contractor, IAW FASB  13. does the
                               contractor get title  to any  property.
                               If so, when, and is the title obtained
                               after the government  pays for the
                               property?
                               A.  Review Leases for Purchase Credits
                               B.  Determine if Government  holds  title
                                       Determine if Consultants provide
                                       evidence of the nature  and extent of
                                       services offered.
                                 A 9,  Laboratory Analysis.
                                       A. Determine how  the fixed  laboratory
                                          rates are established  and  how we  can
                                          assure that labor involved with the
                                          lab services is not billed as Direct
                                          Labor,

                                       B. For Lab analysis costs based on the
                                          contractor's own catalog prices,*
                                          determine if:
                                           (a) the cataloa has been  approved
                                               for use.

                                           tb) the contractor bills  from  the
                                               catalog .
                                           •' c ) the billed prices are burdened
                                               with G&A or fee.  If so.
                                               question the G&A and fee.

                                A 10.  Pollution Liability Insurance
                                       Soecific contractors  (CDM. Mai com
                                       Pirnie, WUS, Weston,  Ebasco. B&V, and
                                       Hill) have been identified to perform
                                       diligent efforts to obtain insurance
                                       from the private sector.

                                       During the review of  these identified
                                       contractors, determine:
                                       (a) what they  have done  to obtain
                                           pollution  liability  insurance?
                                       (b) if they  have obtained it. how is it
                                           charged  (direct/indirect) and what
                                           is the cost, coverage, etc.?

-------
W/P
P.EF
AUDITOR'S
INITIALS
DATE
Paae 15
                              VI.  Review of Indirect Costs

                                 1. Determine the contractor's established
                                    indirect cost allocation bases and verify
                                    that such bases are consistent with the
                                    contract.
                                 2.. Determine from the cognizant contracting
                                    officer for indirect rates what the
                                    currently approved rates *re and which
                                    years have final negotiated rates.

                                 3., Determine if indirect expense charges
                                    are in accordance with applicable
                                    contractual limitations.
                                    Review contractor's most, recent:
                                    Interim Financial Statements (YTD)
                                    Certified Financial Statements
                                    Projected F/Y Financial Statements
                                    F/Y Budaet
                                 5.  Calculation of most recent overhead/0*A
                                    Pates
                                    a.  Based on this data compute overhead
                                       and G&A rates to determine if current
                                       billing rates are reasonable,
                                       1, Remove all unallowable expenses.
                                       2. Remove expenses that are charosd
                                          direct.
                                       3. Review expenses to make sure they
                                          were properly accrued.
                                       4. Trace allocation bass to accounting
                                          records (i.e. if labor dollars is
                                          base, trace to oeneral ledger and
                                          payroll reoister).
                                    b.  If rates were based on budget
                                       information,  compare actual costs to
                                       the budget.
                                 * 6,  Verify that billings for indirect costs
                                      are consistent with the contract
                                      provisions and the BAFO.

                                   7.   Assure that Indirect Cost Submissions
                                       are current,  not over 90 days after FYE

-------
W/P     AUDITOR'S
BfE.     JJiniAJ=s_  DATE.
                           * VII. Review of Contractor's Management of  the
                                  Contract

                                  Review of Contractual Reporting Require-
                                  ments to determine whether  the established
                                  reports adequately provide  all data
                                  relevant to the review of financial
                                  orogress under the contract and are
                                  consistent with contractor's vouchers and
                                  accounting records.

                                  A. Review the monthly progress reports to
                                     determine ifs

                                     1. the expenditure of costs and hours for
                                        both, contractor and  subcontractor(s).
                                        appear to be accurately reported.

                                     2^ the reported hours are actuals or
                                        estimates?

                                     3. the estimated costs and hours to be
                                        expended during the next reporting
                                        period are reported.

                                     4. the additional estimated costs and
                                        hours needed to complete the work are
                                        reported.  And if not, reouest the
                                        current cost-to-complete estimates
                                        from the contractor if appropriate

                                        fa) Get the contractor's explanation
                                            of how they developed the cost-to
                                            -complete estimates.

                                              (i) Evaluate expense trends and
                                                  relationships.

                                             (ii) Review any  variance between
                                                  budget and actual performan-
                                                  ce (i.e. la bor skill mi x,
                                                  etc.).

                                            (iii) Review past three (30 months
                                                  of cost to  complete
                                                  estimates.

-------
W/P
REF
AUDITOR'S
INITIALS
DATE
Page 17
                                     5. any problem(s) affecting completion
                                        of the work within the authorized
                                        budqet are reported.

                                        (a) Compare the contractor's current
                                            budqet for the contract to actual
                                            expenses; follow up on any major
                                            variance.

                                     6. sufficient data is reported to monitor
                                        the actual rate of expenditure of
                                        hours and dollars for the overall
                                        contract, as well as each individual
                                        work assignment.

                                        (a) do the reports show the contract-
                                            or's calculated hourly rate (Total
                                            Cost/Total Hours)?

                                        Note:  We should  be able to compute
                                        this data if the  above reportinc!
                                        requirements are  beina performed by
                                        the contractor.

                                        If our review of  the calculated hourly
                                        rates indicate that there is a need to
                                        redirect work efforts to complete the
                                        work within the budqeted amounts, the
                                        applicable Contracting Officer. Pro-
                                        ject Officer, and Work Assignment
                                        Managers should be informed
                                        immediately.
                                  B.  Review the public vouchers and assure
                                     that the costs are presented in the
                                     format required by the contract and beina
                                     billed IAW government regulations.

                                     1.  Are individual cost elements
                                        adequately shown?

                                     2.  Are current month and cumulative costs
                                        adequately shown?

                                     3.  Are subcontractor's costs properly
                                        shown?

-------
W/P     AUDITOR'S
REF   .  INITIALS   DATE                                              Paqe 13
                           VIII. SUHMARY

                                 1,  Summarize the results of the review.,

                                 2*  Disclose contract issues that need
                                     interpretations or clarifications
                                     Identify situations in ^hicb the
                                     contractor is in non-compliance with
                                     OAAP.

                                     Recommend improvements to contract
                                     financial progress reports so that
                                     EPA may properly manage the contract:
                                     a.  Disclosure of the cost impact of
                                         actual indirect expense rates
                                     b.  Explanations for major variances
                                         between budget and actual variances.
                                     c.  Reporting of O/'T hours and premium,
                                     d.  Detailed projected expenses for next
                                         three (3) months activity.
                                     e.  Graohs which detail variances
                                         between each month's performance.

                                     Conduct an exit conference with the
                                     contractor to discuss the results of the
                                     review to obtain verification of any
                                     issues, facts, etc.

-------
W/P     AUDITOR'S
REF     INITIALS   DATE
Paae 1?
                            IX. PREPARATION OF FINANCIAL MONITORING REPORT

                                1.  Draft the financial monitoring report to
                                    cover findings obtained.  Include
                                    qualifications on any limits to the
                                    program due to lack of data, time, etc.

                                2.  Obtain the Section Head Approval of the
                                    draft.

                                3.  Discuss results (Draft Report) with the
                                    Contracting Officer, the Contract
                                    Specialist and the FACO. for assurance of a
                                    thorough understanding of the issues.

                                4.  Prepare and Issue the final report.

                                ?.  Prepare findina codina sheet for FASTIS,
                             X. DRAFT SPECIFIC REQUESTS FOR AM IKITFRItl AUDIT,

                                Prepare list of specific audit areas for the
                                interim audit request and provide to Contract
                                Close Out Monitor.
                            XI. FOLLOW UP REVIEW

                                1.  Prepare file notes for identification of
                                    areas to be included in a follow up
                                  •  review.
                           XII,  FOLLOW UP ON RESPONSE TO REPORT

                                1.   Obtain Plan of Action and Milestones
                                    CPOAFt) from Contracting Officer/
                                    Contract Administrator if one is
                                    prepared.

                                2,   Review the PQAP! and discuss it with
                                    the Contracting Officer/Administrator.

                                "J..   Track/Assist in resolution of findings
                                    until closed.   Provide summary to Section
                                    Chief monthly.

-------
W/P     AUDITOR'S
        lhl!HALS_.  DATE                                              Paoe 20
                              EXTRA STEPS TO COVER IF TIME PERMITS

                              1.  Review justification for exercise of options
                                  A.  Determine if a current analysis was
                                      performed by EPA Cost Advisor* or DCAA
                                      on reasonableness of costs/rates.

                              2*  If possible, talk to employees
                                  A.  Talk to former employees
                                  B.  Talk to employees that may be leaving
                                      the company in a few days/months and ask
                                    .  Why?
                                  C.  Determine why there is turnover in the
                                      CPA firms, if applicable

                              3.  Floor Check a sample of employees .< both
                                  direct and indirect performing under this
                                  contract

                              4.  Review the contractor's Tax Returns
                                  A.  Check for Sale of Capital Assets
                                      and for $ recovered that should offset
                                      depreciation

                              5.  Review the contractor's Board of Director's
                                  Minute*

                              6.  Use internal audit staff to identify some
                                  findings

                              7.  Be aware of idle Facilities

                           E  3.,  Determine whether contractor system credits
                                  EPA (or no charge) equipment undergoing
                                  maintenance and repair and associated labor-
                                  while on-site.

                           E  9.  Determine the number and obtain list of new
                                  provisional equipment and labor rates
                                  proposed by contractor since inception of
                                  con tract,
                                  Determine the number of these not yet
                                  established as fixed rates

                             10.  Verify contractor payment to employees
                                  is consistent with wage determination
                                  rates and FLSA and CWHSSA

-------
                                                 ENGAGEMENT  LETTER
ATTN:

Dear
     Contract number 		  has  been selected  for  a  financial
monitoring review.  In accordance with the audit clause  52.215-002
incorporated by reference  in  the contract, please make available your
accounting records and other  documentation supporting  the  amounts invoiced  and
your performance of the work  under  the contract.

     The purpose of the review will  be to determine  ifs  (1) your billing and
cost accounting systems are adequately creating accurate public  vouchers and
monthly progress reports,  (2) you are maintaining proper supporting
documentation -for exoenses charged  directly  to  these contracts.  (3)  billing
rates for  indirect expenses are supported and reasonable,  (3)  cost  to  complete
estimates &re accurate and (?) you  are generally in  compliance with  the terms
of the contract.

     In order to expedite our review please  have the information requested  in
Attachment A available for our review at your Corporate Headquarters in
		_   ,.  _	_	_ __  for the  week  of					_						...
Please provide  all items identified  with an  asterisk * to  us within  two weeks
after receipt of this letter  and any other items that  are  reasonably available
prior to our scheduled review date.  We  will hold an entrance  conference upon
arrival at your office and immediately following the conference  we will begin
our field work.,  	  __   _   _  	will be the audi tor-in-^ charge  of this
review.  We will also hold a  preliminary exit conference upon  completion of
our field work.

     During our review we will want  to review your payroll  register, cash
disbursements journal, general ledger, job cost ledger, time sheets, travel
vouchers and vendor invoices.  Additional information  and  records may  also  be
requested during the course of this  review.  In order  to expedite our  review.
your assistance in assuring timely  access and response to  the  requested data
would be extremely beneficial.

     If you have any questions pertaining to this audit review,  the  auditor
may be reached at (202) 475 -	

-------

-------
    Please  acknowledge  receipt  of  this  letter.

    Thank you  for  your  continued cooperation,.
                                                Sincerely.
                                                Dale  W, 'Roberson.  Chief
                                                Financial  Analysis  Section
:c:   All Contracting  Officers  involved  with  the  contractor
     EPA Project Officer
     Contractor's  Controller.  Finance Officer,  and/or  Contracts  Manaaer

-------

-------
ATTACHMENT A                  .                                  Page  1 of 2

   REQUESTED DATA FOR FINANCIAL MONITORING REVIEW

*  1..  Copy of most  recent Certified Financial Statements
       A.  Interim Financial Statements  (Year-to-Date)
       B.  Budgets for Current Fiscal Year 4 Next Fiscal Year

*  2.  Public Vouchers for the most recent three (3) months

*  3.  Required Monthly Proqress Reoorts for the same period indicated in 82
       A.  Monthly Progress Reports
       B.  Contract  Financial/ Management Status Reoorts
       C •  Executi ve 3umm ar y Rep o r t s
       D.  Regional  Summary Reports
       E.  Individual Work Assignment/Delivery Order Status Reports
       P.  Quality Assurance Reports

   4.  Written Policies and Procedures
       A.  Tiiie keeping
       B,  Travel
       C.  Subcontracting
       D •.  Pu r c has i n g/P r o cu r emen t
       E,  EauiDfnent/QDC rates

   5.  Timesheets and Payroll records for period indicated in M2

   c-  Supporting cost records- inclusive of paid invoices, cancelled  checks.
       and ledgers for selected vouchers

*  7.  Schedules illustrating pool and base costs calculating;
       A.  Current Actual Indirect Rates
       B.  Actual Rates'for Last Fiscal Year

*  8.,  Current Cost-to-Complete Estimates for the Contract
       A.  An explanation of the actual procedures used for calculating
           the Cost-to-complete estimates
       B.  An explanation of any variances between Budgeted and Actual costs
       C.  An explanation of the actual procedures used to monitor costs when
           752 of the contract ceiling has been reached

*  9.  Reconciliation of Booked vs Billed Costs (Inceotion-to-Date)

* 10.  Provide schedules identifying all Overtime Premium charges billed under
       this contract.

* 11.  List of ail consultants utilized on this contract.
       A.  Provide a copy of the consultant, agreement
       &»  Provide the negotiated amount and oeriod of performance
       C.  Costs billed to date by Tionth for each consultant

-------
ATTACHMENT A                                                    Paae 2 of 2

* 12.  Provide ?. list 'of all employees working on this contract
       A.  Name of employee
       8.  Identify employee by P-level
       C.  Provide current actual base labor rate
       D,  Hours billed to date by employee by P-level

  13.  Provide selected travel vouchers for the same period of vouchers
       reviewed as requested.

* 14.  Provide current list of Key Personnel.  If there have been any changes
       iince contract award, provide PlODtt with Contracting Officer approval.
       Are the key personnel beina used to perform as required by the
       contract?  Provide Resumes as requested.

* 15.  Provide List of all Subcontractors
       A.  Provide negotiated amount of each subcontract.
       B.  Copy of Subcontract Agreement (for subcontracts over $200,000)
       C.  Period 'of Performance of each subcontract

* 16,. Provide schedules showing LOE by contract performance periods and show
      calculated percentages of LOE delivered.

* 17. Provide schedules of ODC's by cost element, since contract inception.

* 18. Provide a list of equipment utilized on the contract
      *«  Owned but previously leased
      b.  Leased
      c.  Owned

? I?, Provide Equipment Usage/Rental rates with data supporting how the rates
      a rv? d e te r m i n ed an d ad j us ted „

* 20. Provide computer and other ODC billing rates with supporting data*

* 21. Provide copies of most recent Indirect Cost Submissions to EPA,
      DCAA or other cognizant agency.

'# 22. Provide flow chart of accounting/billing system.

* 23. Provide an organization chart of the parent company and all
      subsidiaries.

-------
ENTRANCE CONFERENCE QUESTIONS  TO  CONTRACTOR                        page 1  of  5

NAME OF CONTRACTOR ______________________________________________________________________

CONTRACT NUMBER    _____________________________________________________________________________________


QUESTJ ONS..IO ..CQNJRACIQE

I.   1.  Are there any Pre-contract  costs  incurred?
         If so. is there an advance  agreement?

     2.  Are? any contract modifications, pending?  Discuss.


II.  1.  Any follow-up questions  from response  to engagement  letter?

     2.  When was your last Purchasing System Review  performed  by  EPA  or  DCAA?
         Was your system approved?   If so, provide approval.
         Has there been any recent Property/Equipment  Compliance  Review
         performed by the Government?   If so,  please provide  copy.
     4".  Discuss related party affiliations  (if noted  during  review  of  Dun  and
         Bradstreet Report) and conflict of  interest  (if determined  from
         contractor's list of all clients and/or  if the contractor work for
         several customers simultaneously).
Ill, 1»  What types of Internal Controls does  the  company  have?
         Is there an Internal Audit Staff?
         Are there written Timekeeping Policies and Procedures?
IV.  1.  How are bills prepared?  That is, what are  the source  records,  the
         process followed, reconciliations, etc.?
         Who prepares/reviews bills(invoices )?
         Can the invoices be tied in directly  to the job cost  accounting
         system (contract in total as well as  by DO or WA)?
     2.   Are the total costs (by cost element) incurred on  this  contract
         equivalent to the costs billed on the invoices?

         If  not.  what differences exist?
             •f faoiion 11 y :? r<=> voi."7h<5re 51.1 !?"ti tt^d'

-------
                                                                Page  2 of  5

IV.  3.  Have all of the Work Assignments and/or Delivery Orders  being worked
         on been approved by the Contracting Officer?

         Did you start working on any Work Assianment/Delivery Order  prior tc
         the effective date of the contract?  If so, why?
     4.  Are there any excess funds (based on the comparison of billed costs
         to estimated contract costs) that could be deobligated or  transferred

         A..  Prom one cost element to another?

         B.  From one work assignment to another?

     5.  Has there been any suspended or disallowed billings under  this
         contract?

         If so, what is the current status?
'•>',  At.  Is your timekeeping/time reporting function separate  from  the
         personnel and payroll functions?  That is, does the same person(s)
         who handles the timekeeping function also handle the  Personnel  and/or
         Payroll functions?
         Who fills out the timesheet?

         Who signs the timesheet?

         'ilho approves the time charged?

         How often are timesheets prepared?
         Do the timesheets contain necessary details to identify and allocate
         labor costs to a contract, a work site, and multiple appropriations
         accounts?
    A2.  Have there been any changes in key personnel identified in the
         contract?

         If so, provide Contract tied « with CO approval.

         Are the key personnel being used to perform as required by the
         contract'
    A3.  What is the accounting treatment of unpaid  overtime?
         What is the company's policy on unpaid overtime?

-------
                                                                  Page 3 of  5

V.  A4.  Are there any consultants. Dart  time employees, or subcontractors
         billed under direct labor or as  DDCs?

         If so, identify who: how (what cost element) they were billed, what
         services they provided, and their  cost.
V.  PI.  What are your procedures for determination of accurate and reasonable
         subcontractor accountinci systems and billinas?
         Are they adequate and are they being followed?
         Was a cooy of the Subcontract Plan submitted to EPA?  If not. provide
         a copy if available.
         (i)   How do you. monitor the subcontractors oerformance?
         (ii'i  Do you require* progress reoorts/billinqs for the
               subcontractors?
         fiii; Did the subcontractors provide a certificate of current cost or
               pricing data to the prime?

    S2.  If you are a large business, do you submit invoices  to EPA for
         payment of subcontract costs before you pay the subcontractors?
    E"3.  Are any fixed laboratory rates used on this contract for
         subcontractors?  If so. how are they established?
V,  Cl.  Have any contractual ceilings (on any cost elements) been exceeded or
         likely to be exceeded before completion of the contract?

         If so, what cost element(s) and amounts?
    C2,  Discuss direct purchases of supplies, materials, equipment,, etc. to
         determine whether property has been purchased and properly approved
         un d e "' t he con t ra c t ?
    C3«   Has there been any contractor acquired equipment, previously leased
         for t h e con t r a ct ?

         If so, please provide a current listing.

-------
                                                                      of
V.  C4,  Is there any leased equi patent. front outside vendors or  inter/in tr.?
         company owned, beinq utilized on the contract?
         If so, please provide a list of all leased equi0ment on this
         contract.

         (a) Is the equipment leased from outside vendors?

         (b) Is the equipment leased from an Inter/Intra Company?

         (>:) Is the equipment owned by the contractor & leased to EF'A?

         (d) Do you get title to any leased property?  If so, when.  And, is
             the title obtained after the government pays for the property?


    C5.   (a) Computer Charaes:

             Are they billed at actual rates or estimated rates?

             If billed at estimated rates, are the estimated rates adjusted
             to actuals?  How and when?

             If billed at estimated rates and not adjusted to actuals, how are
             the over/under absorbed costs allocated (direct/indirect)?
                That is. if the variance (over or under) is material in
             amount, is it adjusted to the applicable contracts or adjusted
             in the indirect pool(s) at least annually?
             Motes If material, the contracts should be adjusted.

             Are all clients beinp treated equally7

             Provide supporting data for all formulas and adjustments made.
               Verify that if depreciation is used as a part of the computer's
             actual cost, it is deducted from the overhead pool,
         (b)  Equipment Usage/Rental rates:

             How are the costs priced?
               Is equipment (such as field equipment) billed on a rate
             basis?

             If -so, what are the billed rates and what is the basis
             of the rates?

             Provide supportiia data.

-------
                                                                paae  ^  of  5

     C5.   fc)  Fixed  Laboratory  rates:

              Have you  incurred  «ny  Lab.  Support  (ex:  mobile  lab.)  costs?

              If  so.  are  you  using  a fixed  rate  to  bill  these costs?

              If  you  are  usina  a fixed  rate,  what rate is  being  billed?

              How are these rates established?

     C&,   Do Consultant supportino documentation  provide evidence of  the nature
          and  extent  of services offered?
    C7.  Does  the  contractor's  travel expenses  comply with  contractual
         limitations,  contractor's written  policies  and  the GTR?
    C8.  Has fee  (base fee. etc,)  been  billed  in accordance with  the  contract?
         Discuss.
    C9,  What has  the contractor done to obtain  pollution  liability  insurance?

         If it has been obtained, how is it charged  (direct/indirect) and what
         is the cost, coverage, etc.?
VI,  1.  Discuss overhead rates, billing vs actual, and reasons for any
         variances,

         Are the billed rates the same as the contractual billing rates?
         Have the FYE Indirect Cost Submissions been submitted on a current
         (not over 90 days after FYE) basis?
         Determine who is the cognizant audit agency?

         Which fiscal years have final negotiated rates?
VT.I. 1.  Are the monthly progress, financial management and current status
         reports beinq submitted on time and do they contain adeauate and
         sufficient data as required by the contract?

         fa) Do the monthly proaress reports tie to the applicable public
             vouchers?

-------

-------
              Contractor Purchasing System Reviews (CPSR)
Objective
A CPSR is a review of a contractor's total purchasing, subcontracting
and material control system.

The Federal Acquisition Regulation (EAR) covers the topic in Subpart
44.301, where it states the "the objective of the [CPSR] is to evaluate
the efficiency and effectiveness with which the contractor spends
government funds and complies with government policy when
subcontracting".  The CPSR assures that the contractor applies sound
purchasing practices and provides maximum protection to the government.
The FAR further states, "The review provides the administrative
contracting officer (AGO) a basis for granting or withholding approval
of the contractor's purchasing system.

Please refer to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Manual for
Performance of Contractor Purchasing System Reviews (CPSR) for guidance
in the review of the contractor purchasing systems.   It also provides
the Contractor Purchasing System Review Program.
                                 XI-36
(8/90)

-------

-------
                                                             APPENDIX A
                             Cost Accounting Standards
i.
What  is a Cost Accounting Standard  (CAS)?

      A CAS  is a  fairly general guideline for cost accounting
practices and procedures to assure more uniform treatment
of costs by government agencies and their contractors.

      PL-91-379 created the Cost Accounting Standards Board
(CASE) as an agent of the Congress.

      The CASB, while in existence from August 1970 until
September 1980,  issued nineteen standards.

What  are the Nineteen Standards?

CAS 401 - Consistency in Estimating, Accumulating and
          Reporting Costs

      The purpose of this standard is to insure that practices
used  in estimating costs for a proposal are consistent with
cost  accounting practices used in accumulating and reporting
costs.

CAS 402 - Consistency in Allocating Costs Incurred for
          the Same Purpose

      The purpose of this standard is to require that each
type  of cost is allocated only once and on only one basis
to any contract or other cost objective.  The criteria for
determining the allocation of costs to a product contract
or cost objective should be the same for all cost objectives.

CAS 403 - Allocation of Home Office Expenses to Segments

     The purpose of this standard is to establish criteria
for the allocation of the expenses of a home office to the
segments of the organization such as one or two, or more,
divisions, plants or other sub-divisions which report
directly to the home office.

CAS 404 - Capitalization of Tangible Assets

     The purpose of this standard is to establish criteria
for capitalization of tangible asset costs so that adherence
to the policy will facilitate consistent measurement of
costs over time.
                                      A-l

-------
CAS 405 - Accounting for unallowable costs

     The purpose of this standard is to facilitate the
negotiation, audit/ administration and settlement of contract
costs by establishing guidelines for the identification of
unallowable costs and the consistent treatment of these costs
using sound cost accounting principles.  (This standard does
not govern the allowability of costs.)

CAS 406 - Cost Accounting Period

     The purpose of this standard is to provide guidelines
for the selection and establishment of time periods for
the use of cost estimating, accumulating and reporting.
Through the establishment of time periods the effects of
variations in the flow of costs will be reduced, the contract
closing process will be more objective, consistent and
reliable and contract cost measurements will be uniform in
comparative analysis.

CAS 407 - Use of Standard Costs for Direct Material
          and Direct Labor

     The purpose of this standard is to specify the conditions
under which the contractors can employ standard costs for
direct materials and direct labor.

CAS 408 - Accounting for costs of compensated personal
          absence

     The purpose of this standard is to require that the costs
of compensated personal absence be charged to the accounting
period in which it was earned and that the cost for an entire
cost accounting period be allocated" or a pro-rata basis to the
final cost objectives.

CAS 409 - Depreciation of Tangible Capital Assets

     The purpose of this standard is to provide the
guidelines for

          0  determining the service life of an asset
          0  selection of a depreciation method
          0  determining the residual value
          0  determining the disposition of gains or
               losses on retirement
          0  determining the allocation of depreciation
               to cost objective
                           A-2

-------
CAS 410 - Allocation of Business Unit General and
          Administrative Expenses to Final Cost
          Objectives

     The purpose of this cost accounting standard  is  to
provide criteria for the allocation of business unit
general and administrative (G&A) expenses to business
unit final cost objectives based on their beneficial
or causal relationship.

CAS 411 - Accounting for Acquisition Costs of
          Material

     The purpose of this standard is to assure the
consistency of accounting for material costs and that
the policies for accounting for material costs are in
writing.

CAS 412 - Composition and Allocation of Pension
          Costs

     The purpose of this cost accounting standard  is  to
provide guidance on determining a period's pension cost.

CAS 413 - Adjustment and Allocation of Pension Cost

     The purpose of this standard is to provide guidance
on the assignment of actuarial gains and losses ancL, the
valuation of the assets in the pension fund.  It also
provides guidance on the allocation of pension costs to
segments.

CAS 414 - Cost of Money as an Element"Of the Cost
          of Facilities Capital  "
                                             •%,
     The purpose of this standard is to provide some
cost recognition of the impact of inflation upon fixed
assets and makes some provision for the cost of money
invested in fixed assets.

CAS 415 - Accounting for the Cost of Deferred
          Compensation

     The purpose of this cost accounting standard is to
provide the guidance for the identification, measurement,
and allocation of compensation to employees (i.e. pensions)
                           A-3

-------
CAS 416 - Accounting for Insurance Costs

     The purpose of this standard is to provide criteria for
the measurement of insurance costs, the assignment of such
costs to cost accounting periods and their allocation to
cost objectives.  The application of these criteria should
increase the probability that insurance costs are allocated
to cost objectives in a uniform and consistent manner.

CAS 417 - Cost of Money as an Element of the Cost
          of Capital Assets Under Construction

     This standard provides for the determination of an inputed
cost of money to be included in the capitalized cost of
acquisition of assets developed, fabricated or constructed
for a contractor's own use.  Application of this standard
will provide increased uniformity in accounting for the
acquisition costs of assets.

CAS 418 - Allocation of Direct and Indirect Costs

     The purpose of this Cost Accounting Standard is (a) to
provide for consistent determination of direct and indirect
costs, (b) to provide criteria for the accumulation of
indirect costs, including service center and overhead costs,
in indirect cost pools, and (c) to provide guidance relating
to the selection of allocation measures based on the beneficial
or causal relationship between an indirect cost pool and cost
objectives.  Consistent application of these criteria and
guidance will improve classification of costs as direct and
indirect and the allocation of indirect costs.

CAS 420 - Accounting for Independent Research and
          Development and Bid and Proposal Costs	

     The purpose of this Cost Accounting Standard is to provide
criteria for the accumulation of independent research and
development costs and bid and proposal costs and for the
allocation of such costs to cost objectives based on the
beneficial or causal relationship between such costs and
cost objectives.  Consistent application of these criteria
will improve cost allocation.
                            A-4

-------
How did Cost Accounting Standards evolve?
1968 - Admiral Rickover, at Defense Production Act hearing,
       was invited to comment on the general area of defense
       procurement.  In his testimony, he made some specific
       comments on accounting practices.  They were:

           "The lack of uniform accounting standards
           is the most serious deficiency in
           Government procurement today."

           "Industry will not establish such standards
           because it is not to their advantage to do
           so."

           "The accounting profession 'has had ample
           time and opportunity to establish effective
           standards' but pays 'only lip service to
           the concept.'"

           "If uniform accounting standards are ever
           to be established, the initiative will
           have to come from Congress."

     - The Bill, however, as reported out by the House,
       contained nothing about accounting standards.

     - In the Senate, Senator Proxmire added an amendment to
       the Bill requiring the Comptroller General to do a
       feasibility study for applying uniform cost accounting
       standards to all defense procurement of $100,000 or
       more. (PL-91-370)

     - GAO study was completed in August 1970, recommending
       the development of CAS.  Congress agreed.  The Cost
       Accounting Standards Board was established as an agent
       of Congress to develop standards for defense
       procurements. (PL-91-379)

     - In July of 1972, GSA issued a temporary regulation
       making CAS applicable to non-defense contracts and
       subcontracts.

     - In December of 1974, PPR Section 1-3.1200 was imple-
       mented formally extending CAS to civilian procurement.

     - And now Federal Acquisition Regulation Part 30
       implements CAS.
                            A-5  '

-------
How does the Contracting Officer determine CAS applicability
under FAR or FPR?
   Cost Accounting Standards for Nondefense Contracts (FAR)

Is the contract:

     - with a small business or,
     - with an educational institution or,
     - with a foreign government or,
     - formally advertised or,
     - $100,000 or less or,
     - awarded based on adequate price competition or,
     - price set by law or regulation or,
     - awarded pursuant to a labor surplus  area set
        aside or,
     - price based on established catalog or market
        prices of commercial items sold in  substantial
        quantities to the general public?
             I
               	YRS	(^ No cost accounting
               'standards apply

                                                               •>
Is the business unit currently performing any CAS-covered
national defense contracts?
                	NO	^ No cost accounting
                                       standards apply

               YES
 Did the contractor receive:

     - a single national defense CAS-covered contract
         award of S10M or more,  or
     - S10M or more in national  defense CAS-covered
         contract awards during  the preceeding  accounting
         period,  or
     - Less than S10M in national defense CAS-covered
         contracts in the preceeding accounting period
         but such awards were 10% or more of sales?

                             A-6

-------
                     NO
           YES
All Cost Accounting Standards
Apply.  Insert FAR clauses
at 52.230-3 "Cost Account-
ing Standards" and 52.230-4
"Administration of Cost
Accounting Standards".
Only Cost Accounting
Standards 401 and 402
apply.  Insert- FAR
clauses at 52.230-5
"Disclosure and Con-
sistency of Cost Ac-
counting Practices"
and 52.230-4 "Admin-
istration of Cost
Accounting Standards".
                       A-7

-------
   Cost Accounting Standards for Nondefense Contracts (FPR)

Is the contract:

     - with a small business, a State or local government,
        an educational institution, a foreign government,
        a hospital, the Canadian Commercial Corporation, or
     - $100,000 or less or,
     - to be performed outside the U.S., possessions or
        territories or,
     " price based on established catalog or market prices
        of commercial items sold in substantial quantities
        to the general public?
                        YES	No Cost Accounting
                                       Standards Apply
               NO
Is the business unit currently performing any CAS-covered
national defense contracts or is this contract in excess of
$500,000?
                        NO	.   No Cost Accounting
                                       Standards Apply         ^v
               YES
Is the contract fixed price after receiving at least two offers
from the unassociated firms and, (1) the solicitation sent to
all firms was identical, (2) price is the only consideration,
(3) the lowest responsive offer is accepted, and {4} the
business unit receiving the award is not performing under a
CAS-covered nationl defense contract.
                        JfES	No Cost Accounting
                                       Standards Apply
               NO
Did the contractor receive:

     - a single national defense CAS-covered contract
        award of $10M or more, or
     - $10M or more in national defense CAS-covered
        contract awards during the preceeding accounting
        period, or
     - less than $10M in national defense CAS-covered
        contracts in the preceeding accounting period but
        such awards were 10% or more of sales?

                           A-8

-------
                     NO
           YES
All Cost Accounting Standards
Apply.  Insert FPR clauses
at l-3.1204-2(a) "Cost
Accounting Standards-
Nondefense Contracts" and
l-3.1204-l(a)(2) "Administra-
tion of Cost Accounting
Standards".
Only Cost Accounting
Standards 401 and 402
apply.  Insert FPR
clauses at l-3.1204-2(b)
"Disclosure and Con-
sistency of Cost Ac-
counting Practices"
and 1-3.1204-Ka) (2)
"Administration of Cost
Accounting Standards".
                       A-9

-------
What are the CD's responsibilities for  CAS at  FPA?

     (!)  The CO is responsible for the proper notices
          in the solicitation package and for  assuring
          that the correct clauses go in the contract.

     (2)  The process for contractors is self  certifica-
          tion.  You rely on the certifications given in
          the representations and certification section
          of the solicitation package.

     (3)  How the contractor answers the question will
          determine which clauses should be inserted in
          the contract.   The contractor will be subject
          to:
                If 	

               Full Coverage
                           v
               Modified Coverage

               No CAS coverage
 Then ......

All standards apply

only CAS 401, 402 apply

v/aive all standards
                             A-10

-------
                                                  APPENDIX B
                     SELECTED CLAUSES
This section highlights certain clauses under the Federal
Acquisition Regulations and the EPAAR which are relevant
to cost and price analysis.

The implementation of FAR brought many changes to the
procurement process.  Follwing are some of the more
significant changes.
52.215-1  Examination of Records by Comptroller General

          The Comptroller General shall have access to,
          and the right to examine any of the contractor's
          "directly pertinent books,  documents,  papers
          or other records" within 3  years after final
          payment or a shorter period specified in FAR
          Subpart 4.7.

               (a)  applies to negotiated contracts
                    exceeding 810,000

               {b)  applies to first  tier subcontracts
                    - excludes purchase orders less
                    than $10,000

52.215-2  Audit - Negotiation

          The contractor shall maintain and the
          contracting officer shall have the right to
          examine and audit all pertinent data relating
          to the contract.

          If the contractor was required to submit cost
          and pricing data,  then the  contracting officer
          has the right of examination.

          The contractor shall make records available
          at all reasonable times.

               (a)  includes all subcontracts over
                    510,000.
                           B-l

-------
52.214-26 Audit - Formal

          Cost or pricing data is subject to examination
          for modifications over $100,000 unless modifica-
          tion was competed,  catalog or market price or
          set by law.

               (a)  Comptroller General has same rights

               (b)  applies to subcontracts over $10,000

          Records must be made available by the contractor.

52.215-24 Subcontractor Cost or Pricing Data

          Any subcontract or modification expected to
          exceed $500,000 requires cost and pricing data
          unless price is based on

               (a)  competition

               (b)  catalog or market

               (c)  set by law

          Contractor shall require subcontractor certification,

52.216-5  Price Redetermination
52.216-6
          Invokes Part 31 of the FAR, Contract Cost Principles,
          for both prospective and retroactive price
          adjustments.


52.215-22 Price Reduction for Defective Cost or Price Data
52.215-23

          Applicable to a)  contracts/subcontracts over
                            $500,000
                        b)  required to certify current
                            cost and pricing data

          Contract price or cost may be reduced because of
          defective cost or pricing data submitted by either
          the prime contractor or subcontractor.
                           B-2

-------
   52.215.30 Facilities Capital Cost of Money
             waiver of Facilities Capital Cost of Money

             Discussed in section III
   52.216-7  Allowable Cost and Payment

             Part 31 of the FAR determines allowability of
             reimbursable costs, together with any specific
             provisions which may be contained in the
             contract.
   52.216-10 Fixed Fee, Fixed Fee-Construction,  Incentive Fee

             Fee is paid in accordance with the  contract
             award schedule,  up to an amount equal to 85%
             of total fee,  after which the contracting officer
             may withhold further payment of fee in a reserve
             amount that is considered necessary to protect
             the Government's interest.

                  (a)  the  reserve amount shall  not exceed
                       15%  of total fee or $100,000,  whichever
                       is less.

             Reserve fee is liquidated upon settlement of final
             payment voucher.
1552.242-70
52.216-7(d)
Indirect Cost Rates

Contracting officer shall insert EPAAR clause
1552.242-70, Indirect Costs in solicitations
and contracts where indirect costs apply.

The operative term for indirect cost rates is
no longer "provisional rates".  It is "billing
rates."

The policy under FAR 42.703 for establishing
final indirect cost rates is:
                  (a)
                  (b)
          a single agency shall bind all other
          agencies and their contracting
          officers unless otherwise specified
          by statute.

          indirect costs for cost reimbursement
          contracts and fixed price contract
          progress payments shall be reimbursed
          by applying billing rates and final
          indirect cost rates.
                              B-3

-------
 52.230
It is the policy of EPA for the Cost Policy and
Rate Negotiation Section of P&CMD to be responsible
for negotiating indirect costs rates in accordance
with EPA contracting officer determination
procedures.  (EPAAR 1542.705-1}

The EPA contract specialist, with the assistance
of the cost advisory offices, shall place the
established billing rates in newly awarded
contracts.

-  billing rates may be established or revised
   by the CPRN section, the auditing activity
   or another Federal Government agency.

   billing rates may be prospectively or retro-
   actively revised by mutual agreement, at the
   request of either the Government or the
   contractor to prevent substantial overpayment -
   or underpayment.

CAS Notices & Certification

Covered in Appendix A of this manual.
52.232-20  Limitation of Cost
           Requires the contractor to notify,  in writing,
           the contracting officer.

                (a)  60 days prior to the time when 75%
                     of the estimated cost will be
                     exceeded, or if,

                (b)  the total cost for the performance of
                     this contract,  exclusive  of fee will
                     be either greater or substantially
                     less than had been previously
                     estimated.

           Requires the contractor to submit a revised
           proposal.

           The Government is not obligated to  reimburse the
           contractor for costs incurred in excess of
           estimated cost in the award schedule.

           The contracting officer is the only person
           authorized to revise the estimated  cost.
                             B-4

-------
                                  APPENDIX  C
40 CFR Part 33 (EPA), Procurement
   Under Assistance Agreements
              C-l

-------
12922     . _  Federal Keaister /Vol.48. No. 60 /Monday. March 28.19fl3 / Rules and Regulations
   •VJRONMENTAL PROTECTION
   EHCY

40 CFR Part 33

[OA-FRU 2210-3]

Procurement Under Assistance
Agreements

AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTON: Final rule.	

SUMMARY: This document makes the
Environmental Protection Agency's Part
33, "Procurement Under Assistance
Agreements." a final rule. Part 33
establishes the rules for all procurement
undertaken by recipients  of EPA
assistance agreements. In accordance
with OMB Circular A-102, Attachment
O. and OMB Circular A-110,
Attachment O this rule is designed lo
rely heavily on recipients' procurement
systems. Part 33 applies to all Catalog of
Federal Domestic Assistance Programs
in the 66.000  series.
DATE: This rule is effective for
assistance agreements which EPA
awards on and after March 28,1983.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mchard A, Johnson. Grants-
 .dministration Division (PM-218),
environmental Protection Agency,
Washington, D.C. 20460, (202) 382-5296.
SUPMCMENTARY INFORMATION: On ..
September 18,1981, EPA published in
the Federal Register {46 FR 45963) a-    •
Notice of Availability which made a
draft of Part 33 available for public
comment.
  On March  2,1982, EPA published a
proponed Part 33 in the Federal Register
147 FR «960). and on May 12,1982. EPA
published in  the Federal Register (47 FR
20474] an interim-final Part 33. The May
12.1982. interim-final rule became
effective only for EPA's construction
grants program.
  On July 8,1982. EPA reopened the
comment period on Section 33.240
"Small, minority, women's and labor
surplus area  businesses"  (47 FR 29668).
The comment period on this section was
extended 30 days because it
significantly  changes EPA's existing
minority business and women's
business policies.
  We made numerous editorial changes
throughout the interim-final rule in order
to make this  final rule easier to read and
understand.

Implementation

  Because we published an interim-final
and final Part 33 rule, we  have added
this section to explain when the interim-
 final is effective and when the final rule
- is effective.
   1. If EPA awarded a wastewater
 treatment construction grant under Title
 II of the Clean Water Act before May 12,
 1982, the recipient has the following
 options:
   (a) The redolent may follow the
 procurement requirements in effect .
 when EPA awarded its construction
 grant, or
   (b) The recipient may follow the
 procurement requirements in the May 12
 interim-final rule, provided the recipient
 completed and submitted EPA Form
 5700-18 to the award official before the
 effective date of this final rule, or
   (c) The recipient may follow the
 procurement requirements in the final
 rule.
   2. If EPA awarded a construction
 grant betwnen May 12,1982, and the
 effective date of this rule, the recipient
 has the following options.
   (a) The recipient may follow the
 procurement requirements in the May 12
 interim-final rule, provided the recipient
 completed and submitted EPA Form
 570n-w to  the award offical before the
 effective date of this final rule.
   (b) If the recipient did not submit EPA
 Form 5700-48 before the effective date
 of this rule, the recipient must follow the
 procurement requirements in this final
 rule. The recipient must complete the
 appropriate part of EPA Form 5700-48
 and submit the form to the award
 official as required in § 33.110.
   3. Comprehensive Environmental
 Response, Compensation, and Liability
 Act of 1980. "Superfund" awards made
 after March 2.1982, Included the
 proposed Part 33 rule (47 FR 8960) as a
 special condition in each cooperative
 agreement
   Superfund awards made after May 12,
 19B2, included the interim-final Part 33
 {47 FR 20474) as a special condition in
 each cooperative agreement.
   Superfund awards made after the
 effective date of this final rule are
 subject to the final rule.
   4. If EPA awarded any other
 assistance agreement (other than
 construction grants  and Superfund
 awards) before the effective date  of this
 rule, the recipient has the following
 options:
   (al The recipient may follow the
 procurement requirements in effect
 when EPA awarded the assistance
 agreement or
   {b) The recipient may follow the
 procurement requirements in the final
 rule. The recipient must complete the
 appropriate part of EPA Form 5700-*8
 and submit the form to the award
 official aa required in 5 33.110.
 EPA Form 5700-AB "Procurement
 System Certification"

   This form implements the self-
 certification process. Subpart A
 "Procurement System Evaluation"
 explains how EPA and the recipient will
 use the form. For the reader's
• convenience, we have included a copy
 of the form after Appendix A.

 Description of Major Issues

 Quality Assurance

   On June 14.1979. EPA established
 quality assurance requirements for all
 EPA extramural projects involving
 environmental measurements. The
 objective of the quality assurance (QA)
 program is to ensure that all
 environmentally related measurements
 which are required or funded by EPA
 are scientifically valid, defensible, and
 of known precision and accuracy. Under
 the program, contractors must submit
 QA plans to the  recipient if contract
 activities will include environmentally
 related measurements. The reference to
 EPA's QA program is being added to
 { 33.1030, clause 13. "Responsibility of
 the Contractor," paragraph (a), in order
 to make contractors aware of the policy.
   The QA requirements are specified in
 guideline documents available  from: Sid
 Verner, Environmental Protection
 Agency, Office of Research and
 Development (RD*880), 401 M Street,
 S.W., Washington. D.C 20460, (202) 382-
 5787.
 Major Comments Received

   We received over 125 comments on
 the March 2,1982, proposed rule. The
 preamble to the May 12,1982, interim-
 final rule  addressed some of these
 comments in detail. Since EPA's position
 on the issues discussed in that preamble
 is unchanged, we have not repeated
 those discussions here. The following
 discussion addresses the other areas of
 the regulation which received the
 greatest number of comments:

 Section 33.005  Definitions.

   We  reserved the definitions of
 minority business enterprise  (MBE] and
 women's business enterprise fWBE) in
 the May 12.1982, interim-final
 regulation. We are adding those
 definitions now.
   We received several comments on the
 definition of MBE in the September 9.
 1981, draft regulation which was mads
 available to the public for comment by
 notice in the Federal Register on
 September 16,1W (49 FR 45963). That
 definition used the Srnall Business
 Administration's (SBA) definition of
 minority group members, which

-------
                 Federal Register / Vol. 48.  No. 60 / Monday. March 28, 1983 / Rules and Regulations      12923
    rei

•
  excluded persons from the Indian
   bcontinent from the definition of
     an American." Because a number of
   eople from the Indian subcontinent
   ave participated in EPA's MBE
  program for construction grants, we are
  now revising the September 9,1981,
  definition to include businesses owned
  and controlled by individuals from the
  Indian subcontinent. We understand
  that the SBA is now considering a
  petition to include persons from the
  Indian subcontinent in its definition of
  "Asian Americans."
   We also received comments on the
  need for a definition of the terms
  "Intergovernmental Agreement" and
  "SuppHes;" therefore, we added
  definitions for these terms.

 Section 33.110  Applicant and recipient
 certification.
   We received questions on the
 regulatory authority retained by the EPA
  award official when the recipient
 certifies its procurement system. To
 clarify the authority the award official
 retains, we have added paragraph [e] to
  § 33.110 "Applicant and recipient
 certification."

 Section 33,211  Recipient reporting
 requirements.
   This is a new section which gives the
   porting requirements recipients must
 follow even if the recipient certifies its
 procurement system. Paragraph (a)
 through (d) of this section lists the
 information the Department of Labor
 (Dot) requires for each construction
 subagreement award which exceeds or
 is expected to exceed $10,000. The  Dot
 requires this information to implement
 the Davis-Bacon Act, Copeland
 Regulations, Work Hours and Safety
 Standards Act and the equal
 employment opportunity requirements in
 Executive Order 11246. Executive Order
 11375 and DOL regulations in 41 CFR
 Part 60. Paragraph (e) of this section
 requires that recipients submit to the
 award official a copy of the tabulation
 of bids or offerers and the name of the
 bidder or offerer for each subagreement
 the recipient awards. EPA needs this
 information to efficiently implement
 EPA's debarment and suspension
 regulation (40 CFR Part 32 "Debarment
 and Suspension Under EPA Assistance
 Programs").
 Section 33330  Competition,
  We received several comments on the
 requirements in $ 33.230(c) for the use of
  prequalified list We allow recipients
   use prequalified lists of persons,  firms
or products because they play an
 important part in many State and local
procurement systems. However.
 because a prequalified list could unduly
 restrict competition, we require that
 recipients provide adequate public
 notice that they are maintaining a
 prequalified list that the recipient
 update the list at least every six months
 and that the recipient review and act on
 each request for prequalification made
 more than 30 days before the closing
 date for receipt of proposals or bid
 opening. We believe that these
 requirements will allow potential
 contractors sufficient access to the list
 and will minimi^ the noncompetitive
 nature of such lists.
   We also received several comments
 on the prohibition in $ 33.230(b)(4)
 against the use of local or in-State
 bidders' or proposers' preference. We
 included this prohibition because a
 preference for local or in-State bidders
 unduly restricts competition. If the local
 or in-State bidder is more familiar with
 the local conditions, or can more readily
 mobilize its resources and can.
 therefore, provide the work more
 economically or efficiently,  a preference
 is not necessary because its bid or
 proposal should reflect this  familiarity
 or mobility.

 Section 33.240  Small, minority,
 women's and labor surplus area
 businesses.
           m
   We are  continuing to review EPA's
 minority and women's business
 enterprise (MBE/WBE) provisions in
 § 33.240. We reserved  § 33.240(b) for any
 additional MBE/WBE requirements
 which the Agency may impose.
   On December 17,1982. President
 Reagan issued a Statement on Minority
 Business Enterprise Development which
 encourages Federal assistance agencies
 to achieve reasonable minority business
 participation in contracts under
 assistance agreements. The  President
 noted that minority business
 procurement by recipients could arr.ount
 to SB to $7 billion through FY1985. The
 President also indicated that an
 Executive Order on Minority Business
 Enterprise will be forthcoming, and that
 the Interagency Council for Minority
 Business Enterprise will establish
 uniform guidelines to implement the
 Order. EPA will then review and revise.
 if necessary, its MBE/WBE provisions in
 § 33.240 to assure that they are
consistent with the requirements of
Executive  Order.
  In this rule. S 33.240 contains only
those provisions allowed by Attachment
O. Paragraph 9. Therefore, the MBE
policy (43 FR 60220, December 28.1978]
and the WBE policy (45 FR 51490,
August 1.1960) are no longer mandatory
for recipients of construction grants who
are subject to the interim-final or final
 Part 33 rule. However, any EPA
 recipient may adopt these policies, iin
 whole or in part, by including provisions
 in their solicitations and subagreements.
 In any event recipients and contractors
 must comply with the affirmative step
 requirements in $ 33.240 and any other
 requirements of the State or the
 recipient.
  We also received a substantial
 number of comments on the absence of
 percentage goals in § 33.240 for MBE
 and WBE participation in EPA-funded
 work. We no longer require recipients to
 include goals in their specifications, nor
 will the EPA regions set goals for MBE
 or WBE participation. In the past goals
 served as a tool to determine whether
 the affirmative steps required by OMB
 Circular A-102, Attachment O were
 adequately carried out by the assistance
 recipient and its contractors. In keeping
 with EPA's policy to transfer
 procurement responsibilities to
 recipients, the Agency believes that
 recipients and States should decide how
 to implement the required affirmative
 steps. Therefore, recipients may use
 their own goals. State goals, or other
 standards.
  Several commenters noted that the
 regulation was not clear on whether the
 affirmative steps must be undertaken for
 each group of businesses—small,
 minority-owned and women-owned.'
 Recipients must take the affirmative
 steps in § 33.240 for each group. For
 example, solicitation of MBE's aione
 will not satisfy the requirements of
 § 33.240;  the recipient must also attempt
 to contract with small and women's
 businesses.
  We also received several comments
 that § 33.240fa)(6) differs from OMB
 Circular A-102. Attachment O, section
 9.a.(6). The commenters pointed nut that
 Attachment O requires that the first tier
 contractor take the affirmative steps (1)
 through (5) only if the contractor plans
 to award subagreements. Therefore %e
 have revised § 33.240(81(6) to make it
 consistent with OMB Circular A-102.
 Attachment 0.
  Several commenters susgested that
 we add a definition of "labor surplus
 area." The Secretary of Labor is
 responsible for defining labor surplus
 area. This definition is contained in 20
 CFR Part 6S4, "Special Responsibilities
 of the Employment Sen-ice System."
  With respect to EPA's construction
grants program, we received comments
 concerning the use of MBE/WBE's in
facilities planning and design work. As a
result of the 1981 Amendments to the
Clean Water Act, EPA cannot directly
involve itself in the facilities planning
and design activities preceding the
                                                          C-3

-------
            •

12924      Federal Register / Vol. 48. No.  60 / Monday. March 28.  1983 / Rules  and Regulations
•  award of a construction grant However,
  It is EPA's policy to encourage potential
  grant recipients to adopt procurement
  procedures that at a minimum, include
  the affirmative steps in { 33.240 for all
  activities of their construction program.

  Section 33^55  Specifications.

   One commenter asked if the
  Justification for the use of a restrictive
  specification had to be included in the
  specification itself. That is not the case.
  The justification for the use of a
  restrictive specification must be
  documented and induded in.the
  recipient's files.
   We also receive a recommendation
  that we limit use of "brand name or
  equal" specifications to procurements
  for the acquisition of equipment and
  services, and prohibit the use of a brand
  name or eaual specification for the
  procurement of pipe and similar
  materials.
   We believe it is inappropriate to
  adopt this recommendation for two
  reasons. First neither Attachment 0 nor
  the Clean Water Act as amended,
  provide for any restriction of this nature.
  Second, there may be instances in the
  procurement of materials when the
  redpient's procuring official must resort
  to use of a "brand name or equal"
  specification.
   Although we prefer the use of design
  or performance based specifications, we
  agree that use of a "brand name or
  equal" specification is generally not
  advisable in procurements for the
  acquisition of materials. Instead, the
  recipient should determine whether a
  national or industry standard has been
  developed. If developed, such a
  standard may provide both the recipient
  and prospective contractors a more
  accurate description of the material to
 be purchased than would a "brand name
  or equal" specification.
   A "brand name or equal"
  specification can be used only when the
  recipient determines that it is
  Impractical or uneconomical for it to
 make a clear and accurate description of
 its technical requirements in the
  specifications.

 Section 33380 Payments to consultants.

   We received several comments thaT"^
 this section does not make it dear that
 consultants may receive compensation
 in excess of the GS-18 rate, but that the
 Federal government will limit its
 participation in a payment to a
 consultant to the maximum daily rate
 for a GS-18. We have, therefore, revised
 the wording in this section to make this
 dear.
                                        We also revised paragraph (b) to
                                      clarify that the GS-18 rate limitation
                                      does not apply to firms.

                                      Section 33.295 Subagreements awarded
                                      by a contractor.
                                        We received questions about the
                                      applicability of Part 33 to subagreements
                                      awarded by a contractor. We revised
                                      $ 33.295 to clarify and explain which
                                      procurement requirements apply and"
                                      that they apply only to the tier
                                      immediately below the contractor (i.e.
                                      subagreements awarded by the
                                      contractor.) However, this section does
                                      not apply to a Brat tier subagreement
                                      awarded by the recipient to a supplier.
                                      That is. the section does not apply to a
                                      supplier's procurement of materials to
                                      produce equipment materials, and
                                      catalog, off-the-shelf, or manufactured
                                      items.
                                        We also added three requirements we
                                      inadvertently omitted from the proposed
                                      .and interim-final rules. These three
                                      requirements existed in EPA's previous
                                      procurement regulations, in 40 CFR
                                      30.340-2 (a) through (d). and (g) and are
                                      proposed in 40 CFR 30.301 [a] (11 through
                                      (4) and (7)], the profit requirements in
                                      S 33.235. and the specification
                                      requirements in $ 33.255.
                                      Section 33.S20 Negotiation and award
                                      of subagreement.
                                        We reworded paragraph (a} to clarify
                                      that the recipient must state in the
                                      Request For Proposal (RFP) that he can
                                      make the award based on initial offers
                                      alone. If the recipient does not make
                                      such a statement in the RFP.Hhe
                                      recipient must conduct meaningful
                                      negotiations with all of the best
                                      qualified offerers with acceptable
                                      proposals and permit revisions to obtain
                                      best and final offers.

                                      Section 33.525 Optional procedure for
                                      negotiation and award of
                                      subagreements for architectural and
                                      engineering services.
                                        Several commenters suggested that
                                      we revise this section to delete the word
                                      "optional" in the title. We included the
                                      word optional to make it dear that the
                                      procedures in this section are  not
                                      mandatory. This is in keeping  with OMB
                                      Circular A-102. Attachment O,
                                      paragraph ll.c.(5). which dearly states
                                    i that these procedures are optional.
                                     \  We also revised this section to
                                     \ explain the optional procedure in more
                                      IdetaiL
                                      ^Section 33.715 Use of the same architect
                                      lor engineer during construction,
                                      I  We received comments concerning
                                     / S 33.7l5(a], which lists the
                                     / circumstances under which a recipient
 can use the same architect or engineer
 that performed any or all of the
 planning or design services for the
 architectural or engineering services
 during Step 3 construction of the project.
 The concern was whether $ 33.715{a)(4)
 applies to $ 33.715W (1), [2} and (3) or to
 S 33.715fa)(3) only. Section 33.715{a)(4}
 applies to § 33.715{a)f3) only. Therefore,
 we restructured $ 33.715(a) (3) and (4) to
 combine their requirements into a new
 S 33.715(a)(3).
  Also, we changed this section to allow
 recipient's of either a Step 1 or a Step 2
 grant to use the same architect or
 engineer (A/E) during construction of
 the project without further advertising or
 negotiations, if the recipient selected the
 A/E in accordance with the EPA
 procurement regulation in effect when
 EPA awarded tbs Step 1 or Step 2 grant.

 Subpart D—Requirements for
 Institutions of Higher Education and
 Other Nonprofit Organizations

  Several commenters stated that the
 requirements for nonprofit organizations
 exceed the requirements in OMB
 Circular A-11Q. Attachment O. While
 not all of the requirements in Part 33 are
 required by OMB Circular A-ltO,
 Attachment O, we believe that they
 necessary to ensure  efficient and
 effective program management. OMB
 reviewed and approved all  of these
 requirements during the regulatory
 review process.

 Sections 33.10J 5 throusih 33.1021
 Subagreement clauses.

  In the proposed and interim-final rules
 we included separate sections  in
 Subpart F explaining the four labor
 standards provisions required by the
 Department of Labor (DoL). In  these
 versions of the rule, we briefly
 explained each of these requirements
 and referred the recipient to the
 appropriate DoL regulation. The
 recipient then had to rend the DoL
 regulation and  develop a clause which
 met the requirement However, since
 several of the DoL regulations require
 the use of a standard clause and
because EPA has a form (EPA Form
 5720-1 "Labor Standards Provisions For
Federally Assisted Construction
 Contracts"} which contains the
 appropriate DoL dauses and which has
been approved by DoL. we added
 $ 33.1^6 "Labor standards provisions'
 which requires recipients to use EPA
 Form 5720-4. We believe this will
 reduce the burden on recipients and
 help implement the DoL requirements.
                                                    C-4

-------
             Federal Register /Vol.  48. No. 60 / Monday. March 28. 1983 / Rules and Regulations      12925
     ion 33.1030  Clauses  Changes.
   Comments we received during an EPA
 internal review of this Pan suggested
 that we change this clause to eliminate
 the reference to oral change orders in
 paragraph (a){2). The change was
 suggested to improve the management of
 change orders and to reduce program
 costs. We agree that oral change orders
 may lead to mismanagement and add to
 program costs, sod have, therefore.
 changed this clause. The subject of
 change order management was
 addressed in EPA'e Office of Inspector
 General's September 21, 1982, report on
 change orders "Report on Audit and
 Administration of Change Orders Under
 EPA's Construction Grant Program."
 This report was undertaken as part of
 the President' » Council on Integrity and
 Efficiency's study on change orders
 under contraction programs.

 Section 33.3030  QameS Price
 Reduction for Defective Cost or Pricing
 Data.
   We received comments that
 paragraph 10(b) of 40 CFR Part 35.
 Subpan E. Appendix C-l should be
 added to the end of mis clause in order
 to allow a disagreement over a
 reduction in price to fall under the
 remedies clause of the stibagree'ment.
 We agree and have added a paragraph
 (b) to this clause.
   Another eommenter pointed out that
 by raising the effective level of this
 clause from SIOO.QOO to $500.000. we
 were excluding most of the
 subagreements for services on Step 3
 construction grant projects. We have.
 therefore, changed the effective level of
 this clause back to the SlOO.OOO level.

 Section 33.1O30  Clause 8 Audit;
 Access to Resorts.
  We added a new paragraph (f) and
 revised paragraph (g) to clarify when the
 right of accesa clause applies.
 Meeting With Interest Groups
  On May 6, 1382, at the request of the
 Water and Wastewater Equipment
 Manufacturers Association (WWEMA],
 EPA held a public meeting to discuss
 several issues. Present at the meeting
 were representatives from groups with
 special interest in procurement under
 EPA assistance agreements, including
 the National Institute of Governmental
 Purchasing (N1GP), the Association of
 General Contractors [AGC}, the
 American Consulting Engineers Council
 (ACEC). and the American Public
 Works Association (APWA]. A tape of
this meeting is on file with EPA's Docket
Section in Docket No. G-81-4. In
addition, the positions of the various
 groups are contained in written
. comments also in the Docket. The
 sections discussed at this meeting were:

 Section 33.255  Specifications.
   The issue was whether to delete the
 requirement of 5 33.255 that if a "brand
 name or equal" description is used, the
 salient characteristics of the named
 brand must also be stated. The
 requirement to include th« named
 brand's salient characteristics in the
 specification is a requirement in
 Attachment O to OMB Circular A-102,
 and is specifically called for in House of
 Representatives Report No. 97-270, 97th
 Congress. 1st Session, October 12.1982,
 (page 12). which accompanied the bill
 that became Public Law 97-117.
 Therefore, EPA cannot change the
 requirement to include the named
 brand's salient characteristics.

 Section 33.1015  Subagmesnent
provisions clause.
  The issue was whether to mandate
 progress payments for undelivered.
 specificaUy manufactured items of
 equipment having long production times.
 One eommenter befieved that requiring
 recipient* to make progress payments
for such items would reduce equipment
costs because manufacturers include in
their equipment price the interest on
money they borrow to produce the
equipment While progress payments
could reduce the cost of some
equipment. Treasury Circular 1075 does
not require progress payments;
therefore, EPA will not require them.
This does not preclude recipients  from
making progress payments for such
items and we encourage those who find
it in their interest to allow progress
payments.
Section 33.J030(b)  Clause 4  Differing
Site Conditions.
  The issue was whether EPA shoulb*
require a clause to cover situations
where the actual characteristics of the
influent to a wastewater treatment
works differs significantly from those on
which the original design was based.
Participants in the meeting decided that
a joint WWEMA/ACEC/AGC task
group would provide EPA a suggested
draft clause covering this issue. EPA
considered the tank group's suggestion
and decided that, although the clause
addresses an important issue, it is act
an appropriate procurement under
assistance agreement requirement.
Section 33.00^b)  Definition of
architectural or engineering services.
  The issues were whether the
definition of "architectural or
engineering (.A/Ej services" should
 include manufacturers and contractors
 and be revised to state that providers of
 A/E services need not be licensed by
 the State. The definition in I 33.0C5fb> is
 based on the definition for A/E services
' in the American Bar Association's
 "Model Procurement Code for State and
 Local Governments*" end section 2 of the
 American Society of Civil Engineers'
 Manual 45. Because EPA's definition is
 based on the dsfinitions in these widely
 accepted reference documents, we do
 not believe the definition should be
 changed.

 Section 33.525  Optional procedure for
 negotiation and award of a
 subagreementfor architectural and
 engineering services,
   The issue was whether to eliminate
 the words "architectural and
 engineering." This section implements
 an option to the competitive negotiation
 process under OMB Circular A-102.
 Attachment O. which expressly limited
 the option to the procurement of A/E
 services. Therefore, EPA believes that a
 change to this section is not warranted.

 Regulation Development Process

  Under Executive Order 12291.  EPA
 must judge whether a regulation is
 "major" and. therefore, subject to the
regulatory impact analysis requirements
 of the Order or whether it may follow
 other development procedures. We
 determined that this regulation is not
 "major" because it will not have a
 substantial impact on the economy.
 Consequently, the regulation is not
subject to the impact analysis
 requirements of Executive Order 12291.
  Information collection requirements
 contained in § 33.110 bave been
 approved by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act  oi 1930
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seg.) and have been
assigned OMB control number 2000-
0453.
  The information provisions in  | 33.211
"Recipient reporting requirements" and
the requirement in 133.420(f).
5 33.5lO(b) and § 33.1016 to use EPA
Form 5720-4 have been approved by
OMB under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44
U S C. 3501 et seq.) and have been
assigned OMB control number 2030-
0004.
  This regulation was submitted to
OMB for review as required by
Executive Order 12291.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 33

  Advertising. Conflict of interest.
Environmental protection. Grams
programs—Environmental protection.
                                                 C-5

-------
12926       Federal  Register / Vol.  46.  No. 60 / Monday. March 28. 1983  / Rules  and Regulations
. Dated: March 11.1983.
  hEW.HemandM.lt,
,-ictJng Administrator.
  Accordingly, Title 40 Chapter I is
amended by revising Pajt 33 to read aa
follows:

PART 33-PROCUREMENT UNDER
ASSISTANCE AGREEMENTS

33.001  Applicability and scope of this part
33.005  Definitions.

Subpart A--Procurenwnt System
Evaluation
33.105  Applicability and scope of this
    subpart
33.110  Applicant aad recipient certification.
33.115  Procurement system review.

Subpart 0  Procurement Raqulr»m«noi
33JOS  Applicability and scope of this
    subpart
3&210  Recipient responsibility.
33.211  Recipient reporona requirements.
gagy>  Limitation on subagreement award.
33.225  Violations.
33.230  Competition.
33.235  Profit
33MO  Small, minority, women's, and labor
    surplus area businesses.
33.245  Privity of subagreement
33.250  Documentation.
33.255  Specifications.
33.280  Intergovernmental agreements.
33.285  Bonding and insurance.
33.270  Code of conduct
33.275  Federal cost principles.
33780  Payment to consultants.
33~285  Prohibited types of subagreements.
33-290  Cost and price considerations.
33.295  Subagreements awarded by a
    contractor.

Small Purchase*
33.305  Small purchase procurement.
33410  Small purchase procedures.
33.315  Requirements for competition.

Fonnai Advertising
33.405  Formal advertising procurement
    method.
33.410  Public notice and solicitation of bids.
33.415  Time for preparing bids.
33.420  Adequate bidding documents.
33.425  Public opening of bids.
33.430  Award to lowest responsive,
    responsible bidder.

CorapetitSvB Negotiation
33.505  Competitive negotiation procurement
    method.
33410  Public notice.
33.515  Evaluation of proposals.
33.520  Negotiation and award of
    subagreement
33.525  Optional selection procedure for
    negotiation and award of subagreements
    for architectural and engineering
    services.

NoncompettHve Negotiation
33.605 Noncompetitive negotiation
    procurement method.
Subpart C—Requirements for Rwtoitfita of
A*»l*tanc* Agreement* for Construction of
Treatment Works
Sec.
33.705  Applicability and scope of this
    •ubpart.
33.no  Buy American.
33.715  Use of the same architect or engineer
    during construction.
Subpart 0-Rwpiinnwrrt* for Institutions
of Higher Education and Other Nonprofit
Organizations
33.806  Applicability and scope of this
    subpart
33J10  Nonappticable subagreement clauses.
33J15  Nonapplicable procurement
    provisions.
33.820  Additional procurement
    requirements.
Subpart E—Requirements for Redstart* of
Remedial Action Cooperative Agreement*
Under th» Comprehenalve Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
Of 1980
33 JOS  Applicability and scope of this
    subpart
33.910  Preference for formal advertising.
33J1S  Award official approval
Subpart F—Subaqreetnent Provisions
33.1005 Applicability and scope of this
    subpart
33.1010 Requirements for subagreement
    clauses.
33.1015 Subagreement provisions clause.
33.1016 Labor standards provisions.
33.1019 Patents, data and copyrights clause.
33.1020 Violating facilities clause.
33.1021 Energy efficiency clause.
33.1030 Model subagreement clauses.
Sufapait Q - Protests
33.1105 Applicability and scope of thin
    subpart
33.1110 Recipient protest procedures.
33.1115 Protest appeal
33.1120 Limitations on protest appeals.
33.1125 Filing requirements.
33.1130 Review of protest appeals.
33.1140 Deferral of procurement action.
33.1145 Award official's review.
Appendix A—Procedural Requirements for
    Recipients Who Do Not Certify Their
    Procurement Systems, or for Recipients  .
    Who Have Their Procurement
    Certifications Revoked by EPA
  Authority- 7 U.S.C. 138 et seq.: 15 U.S.C.
2501 et seq.; 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq; 42 U.S.C
241, 242b, 243. 246, 300H. 300J-2.300J-3.1857
et seq.. 6901 et seq.; and 42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.
533,001  Applicability and scope of this
Part
  (a) This part applies to all assistance
agreements awarded on or after the
effective date of this part For assistance
agreements awarded before the
effective date, this part will apply only
to those procurement actions initiated
by the recipient on or alter the date the
recipient complies with the self-
certification requirements in 5 33.110 of
this part. ,
  (b) This pan:
 . (1) Describes EPA's procurement
system evaluation process.
  (2) Identifies the minimum
requirements for the procurement of
supplies, services, and construction
under EPA assistance agreements.
  (3) Identifies an additional
specification requirement for
procurement under assistance
agreements for the construction of
treatment works awarded under 40 CFR
Part 35, Subparts E and L
  (4) Identifies the procurements
standards that institutions of higher
education and other nonprofit
organization* must follow.
  (5) Identifies the provisions that
recipients of EPA assistance agreements
must include in their subagreements.
  (6) Describes the procedures that EPA
will use to handle protest appeals
concerning the award of a subagreement
by the recipient of an EPA assistance
agreement
  (c) This Part does not apply to work
beyond the scope of the project for
which an assistance agreement is
awarded (i.e.. ineligible work].
  (d) This part does not apply to
expenses for services for which the
recipient will receive an allowance or a
potential recipient will receive an
advance of an allowance under 40 CFR
Part 35, Subpart L
  (eJThis part supplements the
requirements in:
  (!) 40 CFR Part 30 "General
Regulation for Assistance Programs,"
and
  (2) 40 CFR Part 32. "Debarments and
Suspensions under EPA Assistance
Programs."
  (f) The following types of recipients
must comply with the specified subparts
in this part
  (1) Recipients of assistance
agreements for the construction of
treatment works awarded under 40 CFR
Part 35, Subparts E and I. must follow
the requirements in Subparts A, B, C, F
andG.
  (2) Recipients of remedial action
cooperative agreements under the
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, Liability Act
of 1980 (Superfund 42 U.S.C. 6901 et
seq.) must follow the requirements in
Subparts A. B. E. F and G.
  (3) State and local government
recipients forothf r than construction
grants and CERCLA remedial action
cooperative agreements must follow the
requirements in Subparts A, B, F and G.
  (4) Institutions of higher education,
hospitals, and other nonprofit
organizations must follow the
requirements in Subparts A. B, D and C.
                                                         C-6

-------
           Federal Register / Vol. 48, No. 60  /  Monday. March 28, 1SB3 / Rules  and Regulations      12927
      *>:
      \
         the construction of treatment
        program under the Clean Water
        U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), it is EPA's
  policy to delegate determinations on
  individual projects to State agencies to
  the maximum extent possible (see 40
  CFR Part 35, Subpart F). This Part uses
  the term "award official." To the extend.
  that the award official for a treatment
  works assistance agreement delegates
  responsibility for determining
  compliance with the requirements of this
  Part (except for \ 33.115 "Procurement
  system review," §33.211 "Recipient
  reporting requirements" and Subpart G
  "Protests") to a State agency under a
  delegation agreement (40 CFR 35.1130),
  the term ''award official" may be read
  "State agency."
   (h] This Part applies to a grant
  awarded under 40 CFR Part 35 Subpart
  E only if the recipient elects to follow
  the requirements in this  Part If the
  recipient of a Subpart E  grant does not
  elect to follow the requirements in this
  Part, it is subject to the procurement
  requirements in 40 CFR Subpart E.

 S 33.005 Definitions.
   (a) Words and terms not defined
 below shall have the meaning given to
     tin 40 CFR Part 30 and 40 CFR Part
^R*
     I As used in this part, the following
 wcrds and terms mean:
   Architectural or engineering (A/E)
 services. Consultation, investigations;
 reports, or services for deaign-tvpe
 projects within the scope of the practice
 of architecture or professional
 engineering as defined by the laws of the
 State or territory in which the recipient
 is located.
   Construction. Erection, building,
 alteration, remodeling, improvement, or
 extension of buildings, structures or
 pthar property. Construction also
 includes remedial actions in response to
 a release, or a threat of a release, of a
 hazardous substance into the
 environment as determined by the
 Comprehensive Environmental
 Response. Compensation, and Liability
 Act of 1980.
   Contractor. Any party to whom a
 recipient awards a subagreenect
  Cost analysis. The review and
 evaluation of each element of
 subagreement cost to determine
 reasonableness, aliocabiiity and
 ailowability.
    tergovernmextal Agreement. Any
       agreement between units of
       ent under which one  public
   ncy performs duties for or in concert
 with another public agency using EPA
assistance. This includes substate and
interagency agreements.
   Minority Business Enterprise, A
  minority business enterprise is a
  business which is: (1) Certified as
  socially and economically
  disadvantaged by the Small Business
  Administration, (2) certified as a
  minority business enterprise by a State
  or Federal agency, or (3) an independent
  business concern which is at least 51
  percent owned and controlled by
  minority group roembeifs). A minority
  group member is an individual who is a
  citizen of the United States and one of
  the following:
   (1) Black American:
   (ii) Hispanic American (with origins
  from Puerto Rico, Mexico. Cuba, South
  or Central America);
   (iii) Native American (American
  Indian. Eskimo, Aleut, native Hawaiian],
  or
   (iv) Asian-Pacific American (with
  origins from Japan, China, the
 Philippines, Vietnam. Korea, Samoa,
 Guam, the U.S. Trust Territories of the
 Pacific, Northern Marianas, Laos,
 Ombodia, Taiwan or the Indian
 subcontinent).
   Price analysis. The process of
 evaluating a prospective price  without
 regard to the contractor's separate cost
 elements and proposed profit Price
 analysis determines  the reasonableness
 of the proponed subagreement  price
 baaed on adequate price competition.
 previous experience  with similar work,
 established catalog or market price, law,
 or regulation.
   Profit. The net proceeds obtained by
 deducting all allowable costs (direct and
 indirect) from the price. (Because this
 definition of profit is based on
 applicable Federal cost principles, it
 may vary from many firms' definition of
 profit and may correspond to those
 firms' definition of "fee.")
   Services. A contractor's labor, time, or
 efforts which do not involve the delivery
 of a specific end item, other than
 documents, (e.g., reports, design
 drawing, specifications). This term does
 not include employment agreements or
 collective bargaining agreemects.
   Small business. A business as defined
 in Section 3 of the Small Business Act
 as amended (15 U.S.C. 632).
   Subagreement. A written agreement
 between an EPA recipient sad  another
 party (other than another public agency)
 and any lower tier agreement for
 sen-ices, supplies, or construction
 necessary to complete the project
 Subagreements include contracts and
 subcontracts for personal and
 professional services, agreements with
 consultants, and purchase orders.
  Supplies. AH property, including
equipment materials, printing,
insurances and leases of real property,
 but excluding land or a permanent
 interest in land.
   Women's Business Enterprise. A
 women's business enterprise ii a
 business which is certified as such by a
 State or Federal agency, or which meets
 the following definition: A women's
 business enterprise is an independent
 business concern which is at least 51
 percent owned by a women  or women
 who also control and operate it
 Determination of whether a business is
 at least 51 percent owned by a woman
 or women shall be made without regard
 to community property laws. For
 example, an otherwise qualified WBE
 which is 51 percent owned by a married
 woman in a community property state
 will not be disqualified because her
 husband has a 50 percent interest in her
 share. Similarly, a business which is 51
 percent owned by a married n"sn and 49
 percent owned by an unmarried woman
 will not become a qualified WBE by
 virtue of his wife's 50 percent interest in
 his share of the business.

 Subpart A—Procurement System
 Evaluation

 933.109 Applicability and scope of this
 •ubpart
   (a) This subpart applies to all
 recipients of EPA assistance
 agreements.
   (b) For procurements involving EPA
 funds, recipients shall use their own
 procurement ooiicies and procedures if
 those policies and procedures reflect
 applicable Federal. State, and local laws
 and regulations, and at least meet the
 requirements set forth in this part.
   (c) This subpart describes  when EPA
 will review the recipient's  procurement
 practices.

 S 33.110  Applicant and recipient
 certification.
   (*} It  is the applicant's and recipient's
 responsibility to evaluate its  own
 procurement system and to determine
 whether its system meets the applicable
 requirements in this part [sen- § 33.001).
   (b) A-'ier evaluating its procurement
 system, the applicant or recipient will
 complete the "Procurement System
 Certification" (EPA Form 5700-J8}. The
 applicant or recipient will either certify
 that
   (1) Its system will meet the intent of
 all the requirements in this part before
 any procurement action with EPA
 assistance is undertaken, or
   (2) Its current system does  not meet
 the intent of the requirements of this
 part and, therefore, the applicant will
 follow the requirements of 4fi CFR Part
33 and allow EPA preaward review of
proposed procurement actions that will
                                                       C-7

-------
12928      Federal  Register  / Vol. 48. No. 60 / Monday. March 28. 1983  / Rules and Regulations
use EPA funds. The additional
requirements for EPA review and   '
approval are contained in Appendix A
to this part.
  (c) The applicant must submit the
signed certification form with the
assistance application to the award
official
  (d) The certification will be valid for
two years or for the length of the project
period specified in the assistance
agreement, whichever is greater, unless
the recipient substantially revises its
procurement system or the award
official determines that the recipient is
not following the intent of the
requirements in this part (see
S 33.115(b)J.  If the recipient substantially
revises its procurement system, the
recipient must re-evaluate its system
and submit a revised EPA Form 5700-48.
  (e) Even when a recipient certifies its
procurement system, the EPA award
official retains  the authority stated in:
  (1) Section 33.210(h) -Recipient's
procurement responsibilities," which
requires the recipient to receive the
award official's prior written approval if
the recipient wants to use an innovative
procurement method.
  (2) Section 33.211 "Recipient reporting
requirements,"  which requires the
award official to notify tie Department
of Labor of certain construction
subagreement awards, and obtain all
bid or offer tabulations,
  (3) Section 33.605(d) "Noncompetitive
negotiation." to authorize a
noncompetitive award.
  (4] Section 33JB20(b) "Additional
procurement requirements." which
requires the award official's prior
approval for  a sole source award over
$10,000 by an institute of higher
education or other nonprofit
organization.
  (5) Section 33.915 "Award official
approval," which requires the award
official to approve the recipient's use of
a procurement method other than formal
advertising for  a Superfund remedial
action award, and
  (6) Subpart G "Protests."

} 33.115  Procurement system review.
  (a) EPA will not substitute its
judgment for that of the recipient unless
the matter is  primarily a Federal
concern.
  (b) Even if a recipient has a certified
procurement system, EPA reserves the
right to review a recipient's procurement
system or procurement action under an
assistance agreement
  (1) To determine if the recipient is
following the procurement requirements
in this part: or
  (2) When there is sufficient reason to
believe that the recipient's system may
be unacceptable based om
  (i) Information concerning the review
or certification of the recipient's
procurement system or actions by other
Federal agencies or Congress;
  (it] Information from the recipient's
cognizant audit agency;
  (iii) Information from State agencies
and organizations independent of the
recipient's procurement activity;
  (iv) Recipient responses to the
procurement system certification form;
  (v] Previous EPA experience with the
recipient; or
  (vi) Information from contractors or
prospective contractors.
  (c) If the award official determines
that the recipient Is not following the
procurement requirements it certified it
would follow, the award official shall
revoke the recipient's certification and:
  (1) Require that the recipient follow
the  procurement requirements in this
part, including Appendix A. for future
procurement actions and. if appropriate,
  (2) Apply the sanctions in 40 CFR Part
30.
  (d) The recipient may recertify its
procurement system if it shows the
award official that it has corrected the
procurement deficiencies noted by the
award official and the award official
accepts the recertification.

Subpart B—Procurement
Requirements

93&305 AppOcaMltty and scope of mto
subpart
  This subpart contains:
  (a] The recipient's and EPA's
responsibilities, and
  (b) The minimum procurement
standards for each recipient's
procurement system.

§3M10 Recipient rMponslbtUty.
  (a) The recipient is responsible for the
settlement and satisfactory completion
in accordance with sound business
judgment and good administrative
practice of all contractual and
administrative issues arising out of
subagreements entered into under the
assistance agreement This includes
issuance of invitations for bids or
requests for proposals, selection of
contractors, award of subagreements.
settlement of protests, claims, disputes
and other related procurement matters.
  lb) The recipient shall maintain a
subagreement administration system to
assure that contractors perform in
accordance with the terms, conditions
and specifications of their
subagreements.
  (c) The recipient shall review its
 proposed procurement actions to' avc
 purchasing unnecessary or dupli
 items.
  (d) The recipient shall conside:
 consolidating its procurement or
 dividing it into parts to obtain a more
 economical purchase.
  (e) Where appropriate, the recipient
 shall make an analysis of lease versus
 purchase alternative* in its procurement
 actions.
  (f) A recipient of a remedial action
 cooperative agreement awarded under
 the Comprehensive Environmental
 Response, Compensation, and Liability
 Act of 1980 must obtain the EPA award
 official's approval to use a procurement
 method other than the formal
 advertising method (see Subpart E).
  (g) A recipient may request technical
 and legal assistance from the award
 official for the administration and
 enforcement of any subagreement
 awarded under this Part. However, such
 assistance does not relieve the recipient
 of its responsibilities under this Part
  (h] A recipient may use innovative
 procurement methods or procedures
 only if it receives the award officials'
 prior written approval.

 93&211 R»clpt«nt reporting r«qutr«m«frt»
  Recipients shall notify the awslfeL .
 official in writing, of each con^^p )>n
 subagreement which has or is exalted
 to have an aggregate value over $10.000
within a 12-month period. The recipient
 shall notify the award official within tei
 (10) calendar days after the award of
each construction subagreement The
notice shall include:
  (a) Name, address, telephone numbei
 and employee identification number of
 the construction contractor,
  (b) Amount of .the award,
  (c) Estimated starting and completio:
dates.
  (d) Project number, name and site
location of the project and
  (e) Copy of the tabulations of bids o:
offerers and the name of each bidder c
offerer.

§ 33.220  Limitation of subagraemefit
•ward.
  (a) The recipient shall award
subagreeaents only to responsible
contractors that possess the potential
ability to perform successfully under t
terms and conditions of a proposed
procurement. A responsible contracto
is one that has:
  (1) Financial resources, technical
 qualifications, experience, dtf^tati'
 and facilities adequate to c^lPlt t
 project, or a demonstrated ablfiry to
 obtain these;
                                           C-8

-------
             Federal Register  /  Vol.  48. No. 60 / Monday. March 28. 1983  /  Rules and ftegi.  :ions      12929
   (2] Resources to meet the completion
 schedule contained in the subagreement;
   (3] A satisfactory performance record
 for completion of subagreements;
   (4) Accounting and auditing
 procedures adequate to central property,
 funds and assets, as required in this Part
 and 40 CFR Part 30; and
   (5) Demonstrated compliance or
 willingness to comply with the civil
 rights, equal employment opportunity,
 labor law and other statutory
 requirements under 40 CFR Part 30.
   (b) The recipient shall not make
 awards to contractors who have been
 suspended, debarredor voluntarily
 excluded under 40 CFR Part 32 nor shall
 it permit any portion of the work
 required by the subagreement to be
 performed at any facility listed on the
 EPA List of Violating Facilities (see 40
 CFR Part 15).

 {3&33S  Vtotetto**.
   The recipient shall refer violations of
 law to the local State or Federal
 authority with jurisdiction over the
 matter (see 1 30.810).

 §31230  Comoctmon.
   (a) The redolent shall conduct all
 procurement transactions in a manner
 that provides maximum open and free
 competition.
   (b) Procurement practices shall not
 unduly restrict or eliminate competition.
 Example* of practices considered to be
 unduly restrictive include:
   (1) Nonomoetitive practices between
 firms;
   (2) OrgenitationaJ conflicts of interest;
   (3) Unnecessary experience and
 bonding requirements;
   (4) State or local laws, ordinances,
 regulations or procedures which give
 local or in-State bidders or proposers
 preference over other bidders or
 proposers in evaluating bids or
 proposals', or
   (5] Placing unreasonable requirements
 on firms in order for them to qualify to
 do business.
   IK) The recipient may use a
 prequalification list(s) of persons, firms
 or products if it
   (1) Updates its prequalified list(s) at
 least every six months;
   (2) Reviews and acts on each request
 for prequalification made more than 30
 days before the dosing date for receipt
 of proposals or bid opening; and
  (3) Gives adequate public notice of its
 preauftlificatipn procedure in
 accordance with the public notice
procedures in § 33.410 or I  33.510.
  (d) A recipient may not use a
prequalified Hst(s) of persons or firms if
the procedure unnecessarily restricts
competition. However, this restriction
 does not apply to 5 33.525 "Optior.nl
 selection procedure for negotiation and
 award of subagreements for
 architectural and engineering services."

 J3&23S  Profit
   (a) Recipients must assure that only
 fair and reasonable profits are paid to
 contractors awarded subagreements
 under EPA assistance agreements.
   (b) The recipient shall negotiate profit
 as a separate element of price for each
 subagreement in which there is no price
 competition,  or where price is baaed on
 cost analysis.
   (c) Where the recipient receives two
 or more bids, profit included in a
 formally advertised, competitively bid,
 fixed price subagreement shall be
 considered reasonable.
   {d} Off-the-shelf or catalog supplies
 are exempt from this section.

 (3U40  Small, minority, women'*, and
 tabor auralua area buairw****,
   (a) It is EPA policy to award a fair
 share of subagreements to small,
 minority, and women's businesses. The
 recipient must take affirmative  steps to
 assure that small, minority, and
 women's businesses are used when
 possible as sources of supplies.
 construction and services. Affirmative
 steps shall include the following:
   fl] Including qualified small minority,
 and women's businesses on solicitation
 lists;
   (2) Assuring that small minority, and
 women's businesses are solicited
 whenever they ore potential sources;
   (31 Dividing total requirements, when
 economically feasible, into small tasks
 or quantities to permit maximum
 participation of small minority, and
 women's businesses;
   (4) Establishing delivery schedules,
 where the requirements of the work
 permit, which will encourage
 participation by small minority, and
 women's businesses;
   (5) Using the services and assistance
 of the Small Business Administration
 and the Office of Minority Business
 Enterprise of the U.S. Department of
 Commerce, as appropriate: and
   (8) If the contractor awards
 subagreements. requiring the contractor
 to take the affirmative steps in
 paragraphs (a)(l) through (a)(5) of this
 section.
  (b) [Reserved}.
   (c] EPA encourages recipient)) to
 procure supplies and services from labor
 surplus area firms.
§31245
  Neither EPA nor the United States
shall be a party to any subagreement
nor to any solicitation or request for
proposals.
 } 33.250  Documentation.
  (a) Procurement records and files for
 procurements in excess of $10.000 shall
 include the following:
  (1) Basis for contractor selection;
  (2) Written justification for selection
 of the procurement method:
  (3) Written justification for use of any
 specification which does not provide for
 maximum free and open competition;
  (4) Written Justification for the type of
 subagreement
  (5) Basis for award cost or price.
 including a copy of the cost or price
 analysis made in accordance with
 S 33.290 and documentation of
 negotiations; and
  (6) Written justification for rejecting
 bids.
  (b] Recipients must state the reasons
 for rejecting any or all bids and the
 justification for procurements on a
 noncompetitiveiy negotiated basis and
 make them available for public^
 inspection.

 93&2S5  Specifications,
  (a] Recipients must incorporate In
 their specifications a clear and accurate
 description of the technical
 requirements for the material product or
 service to be procured. Such description
 shall not, in competitive procurements,
 contain features which unduly restrict
 competition, unless the features we
 necessary to test or demonstrate a
 specific thing or to provide for necessary
 Interchangeflbility of parts and
 equipment cr to promote innovative
 technologies. The description shall
 include a statement of the qualitative
 nature of the material, product or
 service to be procured and, when
 necessary, shall set forth those minimum
 essential characteristics  and standards
 to which it must conform if it is to
 satisfy its intended use.
  (b) The recipient shall  avoid the use of
 detailed product specifications if at all
 possible.
  (c} When in the judgment of the
 recipient it is unpractical or
 uneconomical to make a  clear and
 accurate description of the technical
 requirements, recipients  may use a
 "brand name or equal" description as a
 means to define the performance or
 other salient requirements of a
 procurement The recipient need not
 establish the existence of any source
 other than the named brand. Recipients
 must clearly state in the specification
 the salient requirements  of the named
 brand which must be met by offerers.
 (An additional specification *»qufremetr
 for recipients of assistance for the
construction of treatment works under
                                              C-9

-------
 '12930      Federal Kegfcter  /  Vol.  *&, No. 60 / Monday. March  28. 1963 / Rules  and Regulations
 40 CFR Part 35, Subparts E and I is
 contained in S 33.710.}

 § 33Ł60 lnttn>ov«mment*J agreement*.
   (a) To foster greater economy and
 efficiency. EPA encourages recipients to
 enter into State and local
 intergovernmental agreements for
 common procurement or use of goods
 and services.
   (b) Although intergovernmental
 agreements are not subject to the
 requirements in this part, all
 procurements under intergovernmental
 agreements are subject to the
 requirements in this part except for
 procurements that are:
   (1] Incidental to the purpose of the
 assistance agreement, ant
   (2) Made through a central public
 procurement unit

 } 3X289  BowfnaandbMHnnc*.
   (a) These requirements apply only to
 recipients and contractors with
 subagreements for construction.
   (1) For construction subagreements of
 $100,000 or less, the recipient shall
 follow its own requirements relating to
 bid guarantees, performance bonds and
 payment bonds.
   (2) For those aubagreements more
 than $100,000, the award official may
 accept the recipient's bonding policy
 and requirements provided the award
 official makes a determination that the
 Federal Government's in*west is
 adequately protected. If the award
 official does not make that
 determination, the mte bonding
 requirements for subagreements more
 than $100,000 are:
  (i) A "bid guarantee"  from each
 bidder equivalent to five percent of the
 bid price. The "bid guarantee" shall
 consist of a firm commitment such as a
 bid bond, certified check or other
 negotiable instrument accompanying a
 bid as assurance that the bidder will.
 upon acceptance of the bid. execute
 such contractual documents as the EPA
 recipient may require within the time
 specified.
  (ii) A "performance bond" for 100
 percent of the subagreement price. A
 "performance bond" is one that the
 contractor executes in connection with a
 subagreement to secure fulfillment of all
its obligations under such subagreement
  (iii) A "payment bond" for 100 percent
 of the subagnwmenl price. A "payment
bond" is one that the contractor
 executes in connection with a
 subagreement to assure payment as
required by law. to all persons supplying
labor and material in the execution of
 thfi work provided for in the
sub"sreement
   (3) Where bonds are required ir. the
 situations described above, bidders and
. contractors shall obtain them from
 companies holding certificaties of
 authority as acceptable sureties [31  CFR
 P»rt 223).
   (b] Recipients and contractors must
 follow the flood hazard ares
 requirements of the Flood Disaster
 Protection Act of 1973 contained in 40
 CFR Part 30.

 !3&270 Code of conduct
   (a) Recipients shall maintain a written
 code or standards of conduct which
 shall govern the performance of its
 officers, employees, or agents engaged
 in the award and administration of
 subagreements supported by EPA funds.
 No employee, officer or agent of the
 recipient shall participate ic th*
 selection, award or administration of a
 subagreement supported by EPA funds if
 a conflict of interest, real or apparent
 would be involved.
   (b) Such a conflict would ari«e when:
   (1) Any employee, officer or agent of
 the recipient, any member of their
 immediate families, or their partners
 have a financial or other Interest in the
 firm selected for award, or
   (2) Aa organization wWrh may
 receive or has been awarded a
 subagreement employs, or is about to
 employ, any person under paragraph
 (b)(l) of this section.
   (c) The recipient's officers, employees
 or agents shall neither ?oHcit nor accept
 gratuities, favors or anything of
 monetary value from contractors,
 potential contractors or other parties to
 subagreements.
   (d} Recipients may set minimum rules
 where the financial interest is not
 substantial or the gift is an unsolicited
 item of nominal intrinsic value.
   (e) To the extent permitted by State or
 local law or regulations, the recipient's
 code of conduct shall provide for
 penalties, sanctions or other disciplinary
 actions for violations of the code by the
 recipient's officers, employees or agents
 or by contractors or their agents.

 $3X275 Federal cactprtnelpie*.
 _  The following cost principles apply to
 assi«tance agreements and
 subagreements:
   (a) State and local governments must
 comply with OMB Circular A-87 to
 determine allowable costs.
   (b) Educational inatirutions must
 comply with OMB  Circular A-21 to
 determine allowable costs and with
 OMB Circular A-88 for indirect cost
 rates.
   (c) Nonprofit institutions must comply
 with OMB Circular A-122 to determine
 allowable costs.
   (d) All other recipients, contractors
 and subcontractor* must cow ply with
 the cost principles contained in the
 Tederal Procurement Regulation.-! (41
 CFS 1-15.2 and. if appropriate. 1-15.4) t
 determine allowable cosU.

 $3X280 Payment to eoneuttanta.
   (a] For all EPA assistance agreements.
 EPA will limit its participation in the
 salary rate (excluding overhead) paid to
 individual consultants retained by
 recipients or by a recipient's contractors
 or subcontractors to the maximum daily
 rate for * GS-lB.  (Recipients may.
 however, pay contractors and
 subcontractors more than this amount.)
 This limitation applies to consultation
 services of dssimated individuals with
 specialized skill-' who are paid at a daily
 or hourly rate. This rate t*-jv» not include
 transportation and subsistence costs for
 travel performed: recipients will pay
 tbe«4 ia acc-Tda^ce with their normal
 travel reimburses1 percentage-of-cost (e.g..
 a multiplier which includes profit) a
 the percentage-of-construction-cost
 types of subagreements shall not be
 used..

 93X290   Cost and prte» eomktertfton*.
   (a) The recipient shall conduct a cost
 analysis of all negotiated char»«e orders
 and ail  negotiated subagreementa
 estimated to exceed $10.000.
•   (b) The recipient shall conduct a price
 analysis of all formally advertised
 procurements sstimated to exceed
 SlO.000  if there are fewer than three
 bidders.
   (c) For negotiated procurement
 contractors and subcontractors shall
 submit cost or pricing data in support of
 their proposals to the recipient.
$3X295 Suttegr
contractor.
Twm> awarded by a
  A contractor must comply with the
following provisions in its award of
suhagreements. (This section does not
apply to a supplier's procurement uf
materials to produce equipment.
materials and catalog, off-the-shelf, or
manufactured items.)
  (a) 40 CFR Part 32 CDebarment and
Suspension Under EPA Assistance
Programs);
  (b) The limitations on subagre»me
award in i 33.220 (a)(l) through (a)(5);
  (c) The profit requirements in i 33.235;
                                                        C-10

-------
             Federal Register / Vol. 48. No.  60 / Monday.  March 23. 1983  /  Rules and Regulations      12931
        be requirements for small.
     nriry. women's and labor surplus
     I ousinesses in § 33.240:
     I The specification requirements of
 § 33.255;
   (f) The requirements of Subpart C of
 this Part, if appropriate:
   (g) The Federal cost principles in
 f 33.275:
   (h) The prohibited types of
 subagreements in 5 33.285;
   (I) The cost and price considerations
 in i 33.290. and
   (j) The applicable stibagreement
 provisions in Subpart F of this part.
 Small Purchases

 } 33JQ5 SmsB purchase procurement
   If the aggregate amount involved in
 any one procurement transaction does
 not exceed $10.000, including estimated
 handling and freight charges, overhead
 and profit,  the recipient may use small
 purchase procedures.

         SmsB purchase procadurm.
   Small purchase procedures are
relatively pimple procurement methods
that are sound and appropriate for a
procurement of services, supplies or
other property coating in the aggregate
  it more than $10.000.

    11 S  Requirements for eomMtttton.
  (a) Recipients shall not divide a
procurement into smaller parts to avoid
the dollar limitation for competitive
procurement
  (bl Recipients shall obtain price or
rate quotation* from an adequate
number of qualified sources.
Forma! Advertising

§ 33.405 Formal advertising procurement
  (a) The requirements in § 5 33.405
through 33.430 apply to all formally
advertised subagreements in excess of
$10.000. Formal advertising means the
public solicitation of sealed bids and the
award of a subasreemem based on a
fixed price (lump sum, unit price, or a
combination of the two} to the lowest
responsive, responsible bidder.
  (b) Formal advertising requires at a
minimum:
  (1J A complete, adequate and realistic
specification m purchase description of
what is required:
  (2) Two or more responsible bidders
which are willing and able to compete
effectively for the recipient's business;
    VA procurement that lends itself to
    award of a fixed-price
    agreement: a«d
  (4) That the selection of the successful
bidder be made principally on the basis
of price.
                                        § 33.4 10 Public notice and solicitation cf
                                        bids.
                                          The recipient shall give adequate
                                        public notice of the solicitation, inviting
                                        bids and stating when and how the
                                        bidding documents may be obtained or
                                        examined.

                                        $33.415 Tim* for preparing bids.
                                          The recipient must allow adequate
                                        time between the date the public notice
                                        is first published and the date by which
                                        bids must be submitted.
                                        53X420 Adequate bidding documents.
                                          Recipient's bidding documents shall
                                        include:
                                          (a) A complete statement of work to
                                        be performed including, where
                                        appropriate, design drawings and
                                        specifications and the required
                                        performance schedu)*;
                                          (b) The terms and conditions of the
                                        subagreement to be awarded, including
                                        payment, delivery schedules, point of
                                        delivery and acceptance criteria;
                                          (c) A dear explanation of the
                                        recipient's mR'hod of bidding and the
                                        method of evaluating bid prices, and its
                                        basis and met^d for awarding the
                                        subagreement:
                                          (d) Any niher responsibility
                                        requirements or evaluation criteria
                                        which the recipient will use in
                                        evaluating bidders;
                                          (e) The prevailing wage
                                        determination, made under the Davis-
                                        Bacon Act if applicable; and
                                          (f) The deadline and place to submit
                                        bids and a copy of I 33.295. Subparts F
                                        and C aM. if appropriate. EPft Form
                                        5720-4 "Labor Standard Provisions for
                                        Federally Assisted Contracts,"
                                       §33.0$ ruMe coming of bids.
                                         The recipient shall publicly open bids
                                       at the place, date and time announced in
                                       the bidding documents.

                                       I 33.430 Award to the lowest, responsive,
                                       responsible bidder.
                                         (a] The recipient shall evaluate all
                                       bids in accordance with the methods
                                       and criteria in the bidding documents.
                                         (b) The recipient shall award a fixed*
                                       price subagreement to  the lowest
                                       resconsive, responsible bidder. Where
                                       specified in the bidding documents,
                                       recipients shall consider factors such as
                                       discounts, transportation costs and life
                                       cycle costs to determine the low bid.
                                       Payments discounts  may be used to
                                       determine the low bid only when prior
                                       experience of the recipient indicates
                                       that it generally accepts such discounts.
                                         (c) The recipient may reject ail bids
                                       only when it has sound, documented
                                       business reasons which are in the best
                                       interest of th- program for whtch EPA

                                                     Oil
 assistance is awarded (see § .33 250
 "Documentation").
 Competitive Negotiation

 J 33.505  Competitive negotiation
 procurement method.
   (a) The requirements in § § 33.505
 through 33.525 apply to-«ll competitively
 negotiated subagreements in excess of
 $10.000.
   (b) Recipients may use competitive
 negotiation only if conditions are not
 appropriate for the use of the formal
 advertising method of procurement (see
 $ 33.405).

 §33.510  PwWIc notice.
   (a] The recipient must give adequate
 public notice for competitively
 negotiated procurements,
   (b) The notice of a request for
 proposals must state how to obtain
 associated documents, including a copy
 of § 33.295, Subparts F and G, the basis
 for 3ubagrserr<<»nt award, and, if
 appropriate, EPA Form 5720-4 "Labor
 Standard Provisions for Federally
 Assisted Contracts.'*
   (c) Requests for proposals must be
 written, contain enough information to
 enable a prospective offerer to prepare a
 proposal, contain all evaluation criteria
 ard th* relative importance attached to
 each, and clearly state the deadline and
 place to submit proposals.

 § 33.515  Evaluation of propowtis.
  (a) Recipients must uniformly and
 objectively evaluate all proposals
 submitted in response to the request for
 proposals-
  fb) Recipients must base their
 determinations of qualified offerers and
 acceptable proposals solely on 'he
 evaluation criteria stated in the request
 for proposals,

 $ 33.520  Negotiation and award of
 subaqreefneflt
  (a) Unless the request for proposals
 states that award may be based yn
 ioitiai offers alone, the recipient must
 conduct meaningful negotiations with
 the best qualified offerers with
 acceptable proposals within the
 competitive range, and permit revisions
 lo obtain bpst .ITK? *inal offers. The best
 qualified offerers must have equal
 opportunities to negotiate or revise their
 proposals. During negotiations, the
 recipient must not disclose the indentity
 of competing offerers or any information
 front competing proposals.
  (b) The recipient must award the
subagreement to the responsible offeror
whose proposal is determined in writing
to  be the most advantageous  to the
recipient, taking into consideration price

-------
12932      Federal Register / Vol. 48, No.  60 / Monday. March 28. 1983  / Rulea and Regulations
and other evaluation criteria set forth in
the request for proposal.
  (c) The recipient must promptly notify
unsuccessful offerers that their
proposals were refected.
  (d) The recipient must document its
procurement file to indicate how
proposals were evaluated, what factors
were used to determine the best
qualified offerers within the competitive
range, and what factors were used to
determine th« subagreement award.

§3&52S  Opttonaf selection procedursfor
negotiation and swud of subsgresnunts
for architectural vnd engineering services*
  (a) The recipient may evaluate and
select an architect or engineer using the
procedures in this section in place of the
procedures la \ 33.520. "Negotiation and
award of subagreementa."
  (b) The recipient may use either a
Disqualified list developed in
accordance with § 33.230{c] or
responses to requests for statement of
qualifications to determine the most
technically qualified architects or
engineers.
  (c) After selecting and ranking the
most qualified architects or engineers,
the recipient will request technical
proposals from those architects or
engineers and inform them of the
evaluation criteria the recipient will use'
to rank the  proposals.
  (d} The recipient shall then select and
determine, in writing, the best technical
proposal.
  (e) After selecting the best proposal,
the recipient shall attempt to negotiate
fair pnd reasonable compensation with .
that offerer..
  (f) If the recipient and the offerer of
the best proposal cannot agree on the
amount of compensation, the recipient
shall formally terminate negotiations
with that offerer. The recipient shall
then negotiate with the offerer with the
next best proposal. This process will
continue until the recipient reaches
agreement on compensation with an
offerer with an acceptable proposal.
Once the recipient terminates
negotiations with an offerer, the
recipient cannot go back and renegotiate
with that offerer.

Noncompetitive Negotiation

$33.805  Moncompettttva negotiation
procurement method.
  Recipients may use noncompetitive
negotiation to award a subagreement if
the other three procurement methods are
inappropriate because:
  (a) The item is available only from a
single source;
  (b) A public  exigency or emergency
exists and the urgency for tha
requirement will not permit a delay
incident to competitive procurement;
  (c) After solicitation from a number of
sources, competition is inadequate; or
  (d) The EPA award official authorizes
noncompetitive negotiation, subject to
the limitation in $ 33.715(a}(2).

Subpart C—Requirements for
Recipients of Assistance Agreements
for the Construction of Treatment
Works

133.705 Appfaabffity end aeope ol this
•ubpart
  Recipients of assistance agreements
awarded under 40 CFR Part 35, Subparts
E and I must comply with the" following
requirements.

{33.710 Buy American.
  Section 215 of the Clean Water Act
requires that contractors give preference
for the use of domestic material in the
construction of EPA funded treatment
works.
  (a) Contractors must use domestic
construction material in preference to
nondomestic material if it is priced no
more than B percent higher than the bid
or offered price of the nondomestic
material, including all costs of delivery
to the construction site and any
applicable duty, whether or not
assessed. The recipient will normally
base the computations on prices and
costs in effect on the date of opening of
bids or proposals.
  (b] The award official may waive the
Buy American provision based upon
factors he considers relevant including;
  (1) Such use is not in the public
interest;
  (2) The cost is unreasonable;
  (3) The Agency's available resources
are not sufficient to implement the
provision, subject to the Deputy
Administrator's concurrence;
  (4) The articles, materials or supplies
of the class or kind to be used  or the
articles, materials or supplies from
which they are manufactured are not
mined, produced or manufactured in the
United States in sufficient and
reasonably available commercial
quantities or satisfactory quality for the
particular project: or
  (5) Application of this provision is
contrary to multilateral government
procurement agreements, subject to the
Deputy Administrator's concurrence.
  (c) All bidding documents.
subagreements. and. if appropriate,
requests for proposals must contain the
"Buy American" provision in $ 33.1030.

$33.715 Useoftheswnedrchltectar
engineer during construction.
  (a) If the recipient is satisified with
thn Qualifications and performance of
the architect or engineer who provided
any or all of the facilities planning or
design services for the project and
wishes to retain that firm or individu
during construction of the project, it
do so without further public notice and
evalution of qualifications, provided:
  [1] The recipient received a facilities
planning (Step 1} or design grant (Step
2}. and selected the architect or engineer
in accordance with EPA's procurement
regulations in effect when EPA awarded
the grant or
  (2) The award official approves
noncompetitive procurement under
$ 33.605(d) for reasons other than simply
using the same individual or firm that
provided facilities planning or design
services for the project; or
  (3) The recipient attests that
  (i) The initial request for proposals
clearly stated the possibility that the
firm or individual selected could be
awarded a subagreement for services
during construction; and
  (ii) The firm or individual was
selected for facilities planning or design
services in accordance with procedures
in:
  (A) Section 33.230 "Competition."and
  (B) Section 33^50(»)(1). (a){2] & (a)(3),
and (b) "Documentation." and one of the
following:
  (C} Section 33405 through 33.315
"Small Purchases," or
  (D) Section 33.405 through 33.430  .
"Formal Advertising;"or
  (E] Section 33.505 through 33.525
"Competitive Negotiation."
  (iii) No employee,  officer or agent of
the recipient, any member of their
immediate families, or their partners
have financial or other interest in the
firm selected for award; and
  (iv) None of the recipient's officers,
employees or agents solicited or
accepted gratuities, favors or anything
of monetary value from contractors or
other parties to subagreements.
  (b) However, if the recipient uses the
procedures to paragraph (a) to retain an
architect or engineer, any Step 3
subagreements between the architect or
engineer and the recipient must meet all
of the other procurement provisions in
this part

Subpart 0—Requirements for
Institutions of Higher Education and
Other Nonprofit Organizations

533*05   Applicability and scope of this
subpart
  Recipients who are subject to the
provisions of OMB Circular A-110,
"Grants and Agreements with
Institutions of Hishsr Education,
Hospitals, and Other Nonprofit
                                                    C-12

-------
              Federal Register  /  Vol.  48. No.  60 / Monday.  March 23, 1963 / Rules and  Regulations      12933
    _janizationa" are Dot subject to all of
t ^Bquirementa in this part

  § 33.810 NoftappflcaMe subaoreement
    The following clauses in Subpart F of
  this part do not apply to institutions of
  higher education and other nonprofit
  organizations:
    (a] Energy efficiency (§ 33,1024):
    (b) Changes (3 33.1030,3);
    (c) Differing site conditions
  (S 33.1030.4): and
    (d) Price reduction for defective cost
  or pricing data (8 33.1030,8).

  S 33J1S  NonappttcaMe procurement
  provision*.

    The following procurement provisions
  do not apply to institutions of higher
  education and other nonprofit
  organizations:
    (a) Subparts C and &
    (b] Sections 33.405 through 33.430
  "Formal advertising:"
    (c) Sections 33 JOS through 33.525
  "Competitive negotiation;"
    (d) Section 33.605 "Noncompetitive
      «"atfonM (see S 33.820(b));
       "he requirement in § 33.270{a)
       of conduct" to have a written
  code of conduct:
    (f) The provisions of 5 33-240 "Small
  minority, women's, and labor surplus
  area businesses" which:
   (1) Encourage the award of a fair
  share of contracts to women's and labor
  surplus area businesses;
   (2) Require the specific affirmative
  action steps in S 33.240(a)(l) through
  (a){6); however, nonprofit organizations
  are required to make positive efforts to
  use small businesses and minority
  owned businesses as sources of supplies
  and services;
   (g) Subpart G "Protests."

  § 33420  Additional procurement
  requirements.

   (a) Recipients must exclude
  contractors that develop or draft
 specifications, requirements, statements
 of work, invitation for bids, or requests
 for proposals from competing for awards
 resulting from the prior effort
   (b) For all proposed sole source
 subagreements and where only one bid
      posal is received, the recipient
    t request the award official's prior
  . ...roval to award the subagreement if
 rhi aggregate expenditure is expected to
 exceed $10,000.
 Subpart E—Requirements for
 Recipients of Remedial Action
 Cooperative Agreements Under the
 Comprehensive Environmental
 Response, Compensation, and Liability
 Act of 1980

 §33.905  Applicability and scop* o! this
 subpart
   (a) The requirements in 55 33.910
 through 33.915 apply only to remedial
 actions which EPA funds as part of a
 cooperative agreement under the
 Comprehensive Environmental
 Response, Compensation, and Liability •
 Act of 1980 iSuperfund).
   (b) Studies, investigations,  or
 engineering activities which precede a
 remedial action activity are not subject
 to the requirements in §5 33.910 through
 33.915. but are subject to the
 requirements in Subparts A. B, F and G
 of this part

 §33.910  Preference for formal
 advertising.
   If a recipient wants to use a
 procurement method other than formal
 advertising, it must receive the EPA
 award official's concurrence with the
 determination.

 §33J1S  Award official approval.
  The award official shall approve the
 recipient's use of a procurement method
 other than formal advertising only after
 the recipient has completed planning
 remedial activities and selected a cost-
 effective  alternative.

 Subpart F—Subagreement Provisions

 §32.1005  Applicability and scop* of this
 suboart
  (a} This subpart applies to all EPA
 recipients and describes the minimum
 content of each subagreement (contract
 and subcontract).
  (b) Nothing in this subpart prohibits a
 recipient from requiring more
 assurances, guarantees, or indemnity or
 other contractural requirements from
 any party to-a subagreement

 § 33.1010  Requirement* for  iiihnjjrnnmnnt
 clause*.
  Recipients shall include clauses that
 meet the requirements of 55 33.1015
 through 33.1021. and the appropriate
 clauses in 5 33.1030, in each  •
procurement subagreement
§33.1015  Subagrwm*nt provisions
                                          (c] Total cost of the subagreement:
                                        and
                                          (d) Payment provisions.

                                        § 33.1016  tabor standards provisions.
                                          Recipients shall include a copy of EPA
                                        Form 5720-4 "Labor Standards
                                        Provisions for Federally Assisted
                                        Construction Contracts" in each
                                        subagreement for construction (as
                                        defined by the Secretary of Labor). The
                                        form contains the Davis-Bacon Act
                                        requirements (40 U.S.C. 276a—276a-7);
                                        the Copeland Regulations (29 CFR Part
                                        3); the Contract Work Hours and Safety
                                        Standards Act—Overtime
                                        Compensation (940 U.S.C. 327-333) and
                                        the nondiscrimination provisions in
                                        Executive Order 11246. as amended.

                                        § 33.1019  Patents data and copyrights
  Each subagreement must include
provisions defining a sound and
complete agreement including the:
  (a) Nature, scope, and extent of work
to be performed;
  (b] Timeframe for performance;
   Except for construction grant
 subagreements, all subagreements shall
 include notice of EPA requirements and
 regulations pertaining to reporting and
 patent rights under any subagreement
 involving research, developmental,
 experimental or demonstration work
 with respect to any discovery or
 invention which arises or is developed
 in the conduct of work under a
 subagreement This notice shall also
 include EPA requirements and
 regulations pertaining to copyrights and
 rights in data contained in 40 CFR Part
 30.

 §33.1020 Violating facilities clause.
  Subagreements in excess of Ł100,000 *'
 shall contain a provision which requires
 contractor compliance with all
 applicable standards, orders or
 requirements issued under Section 306
 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 1857(h))L
 Section 508 of the Clean Water Act (33
 U.S.C. 1368), Executive Order 11738, and
 EPA regulations (40 CFR Part 15) which
 prohibit the use under nonexempt
 Federal contracts, grants or loans of
 facilities included on  the EPA List of
 Violating Facilities.

 §33.1021 Energy efficiency cJause.
  Subugreements shall comply with
 mandatory standards and policies on
 energy efficiency contained in the
 State's energy conservation plan issued
 in compliance with the Energy Policy
 and Conservation Act (Pub. L. 94-163).

 §33.1030 Model subaerewnent clause*.
  Recipients must include, when
 appropriate, the following clauses or
 their equivalent in each subagreement
Recipients may substitute other terms
 for "recipient and" "contractor" in their
subagreement.i.
                                                        C-13

-------
 12934       Federal Register  / Vol.  48. No. 60  / Monday. March 28, 1983  / Rules and  Regulations
 1. Supanmsion
   The recipient and the contractor agree that
 this and other appropriate clauses in 40 CFR
 33.1030 apply to that work eligible for EPA
 assistance to be performed under this
 subagreement and that these clause
 supersede any conflicting provisions of this
 subagreement
 2. Privity of Subagreement
   This subagreement is expected to be
 funded in part with funds from the U.S.
 Environmental Protection Agency. Neither
 the United States nor any of its departments.
 agencies or employees is, or will be. a party
 to this subagreement or any lower tier
 subagreement This subagnement is subject
 to regulations contained in 40 CFR Part 33 in
 effect on the date of the assistance award for
 this project
 3. Changes
   (a) The following clause applies only to
 subagnemeats for construction. (1) The
 recipient may at any time, without notice to
 any surety, by written order designated or
 indicated to be a change order, make any
 Chang* in the work within the general scope
 of the subagreement Including but not limited
  (I) in the specifications (including drawings
and designs);
  (ill In the time, method or manner of
performance of the work:
  (iii) In the recipient-furnished facilities,
equipment, materials, services or site, or
  (iv) Directing acceleration in the
performance of the work. .
  (2) A change order shall also be any other
written order (Including direction, instruction.
interpretation or determination) from the
recipient which causes-any change, provided
the contractor gives the recipient written
notice stating tbe date, circumstances and
source of the order and that the contractor
regards the order as a change order.
  (3) Except as provided in this clause, no
order, statement or conduct of the recipient
shall be treated as a change under this clause
or entitle the contractor to aa equitable
adjustment
  (4) If any change under this clause causes
an increase or decrease in the contractor's
cost or the time required to perform any pan
of the work under this contract, whether or
not changed by any order, the recipient shall
make an equitable adjustment and modify the
aubagreement in writing. Except for claims
based on defective specifications, no claim
far any change under paragraph (a)(2) above
shall be allowed for any costs incurred more
than 20 days before the contractor gives
written notice as required in paragraph (a)(2).
ID the case of defective specifications for
which me recipient is responsible, the
equitable adjustment shall include any
increased cost  the contractor reasonably
incurred in attempting to comply with those
defective specifications.
  (S) If the contractor intends to assert a
claim for an equitable adjustment under this
clause, he must, within 30 days after receipt
of a written change order under paragraph (a)
(1) or the furnishing of a written notice under
paragraph (a) (2). submit a written statement
to the recipient setting forth the general
 nature and monetary extent of such claim.
 The recipient may extend the 30-day period.
 The contractor may include the statement of
 claim in the notice under paragraph (2) of this
 change clause.
  (6) No claim by the contractor for an
 equitable adjustment shall be allowed if
 made after final payment under this
 subagreement.
  (bj The following clause applies only to
 subagnements for services. (l}The recipient
 may at any time, by written order make
 changes within the general scope of this
 subagreement in the services or work to be
 performed. If such changes cause an increase
 or decrease in the contractor's cost or time
 required to perform any services under this
 subagreement whether or not changed by
 any order, the recipient shall make an
 equitable adjustment and modify this
subagreement in writing. The contractor must
assert any claim for adjustment under this
clause in writing within 30 days from the date
it receives the recipient's notification of
change, unless the recipient grants additional
time before the date of final payment.
  (2] No services for which the contractor
will charge an additional compensation shall
be furnished without the written   .
authorization of the recioient.
  (c) The following clause applies only to
subagreements for supplies. (1J The recipient
may at any time, by written order and
without notice to the sureties, change the
general scope of this subagreement in any
one or more of the following:
  (i) Drawings, designs or specifications
where the supplies to be furnished are
specifically manufactured for th» recipient
  (Li) Method of shipment or packing; and
  (Ui) Place of delivery.
  (2) If any change causes an increase or
decrease in the cost or the time required to
perform any part of the work under this
subagreement whether or not changed by
any such order, the recipient shall make an
equitable adjustment in  the subagreement
agreement price or delivery schedule, or both.
and modify the subasreement in writing. The
contractor must assert any claim for
adjustment under this clause within 30 days
tram the date the contractor receives the
recipient's notification of change. If the
recipient decides that the facts justify such
action, the recipient may receive and act
upon any such claim asserted at any time
before final payment under this
subagreement Where the cost of property
made obsolete or excess as a result of a
change is included in the contractor's claim
for adjustment the recipient has the right to
prescribe the manner of disposition of such
property. Nothing in this clause shall excuse
the contractor from proceeding with the
subagreement as changed.

4. Differing Site Conditions
  The following clause applies only to
construction subagreements. (a] The
 contractor shall promptly, and before such
 conditions are disturbed, notify the recipient
 in writing of:
  (1) Subsurface or latent physical co
 at the site differing materially from
 indicated in this subagreemen'.. or
  (2) Unknown physical conditions at the
 site, of an unusual nature, differing materially
 from those ordinarily encountered  and
 generally recognized as inhering in work of
 the character provided for in this
 subagreement.
  (b) The recipient shall promptly investigate
 the conditions. If it finds that conditions
 materially differ and will cause an  increase
 or decrease in the contractor's cost or the
 time required to perform any part of the work
 under this subagreement whether or not
 changed as a result of such conditions, the
 recipient shall make an equitable adjustment
 and modify the subagreement in writing.
  (c) No claim of the contractor under this
 clause shall be allowed unless the contractor
 has given the notice required in paragraph (a)
 of this clause. However, the recipient may
 extend the time prescribed in paragraph (a).
  (d) No claim by the contractor for an
 equitable adjustment shall be allowed if
 asserted after final payment under  this
 subagreement.
 5. Suspension of Work
  The following clause applies only to
 construction sitbagreementa. (a) The recipient
 may order the contractor in writing to
 suspend, delay or interrupt all or any part of
 the work for such period of time as '
 recipient may determine to be ap
 the convenience of the recipient
  (b) If the performance of all or any pSTt of
 the work is suspended, delayed or
 interrupted for an unreasonable period of
 time by an act of the recipient in
 administration of this subagreement or by
 the recipient's failure to act within the time
 specified in this subagreement (or if no time
 is specified, within a reasonable time], the
 recip>nt shall make an adjustment for any
 increase in the cost of performance of this
 subagreement (excluding profit) necessarily
 caused by such unreasonable suspension,
 delay or interruption and modify the contract
 writing. However, no adjustment shall be
made under this clause for any suspension,
 delay or interruption to the  extent (1) that
 performance would have been so suspended,
 delayed or interrupted by any other cause.
including the fault or negligence of  the
 contractor, or (2) for which an equitable
 adjustment is provided for or excluded under
 any other provision of this subagreement.
  (c] No claim under this clause shall be
 allowed (1) for any costs incurred more  than
20 days before the contractor notified the
 recipient in writing of the act, or failure  to
 act involved (this requirement does not appl
 to a claim  resulting from a suspension order)
 and (2) unless the amount claimed is asserte<
in writing as soon as practicable after the
 termination of such suspension, delay or
 interruption, but not later than l
 final payment under the sub
                                                   014

-------
               Federal Register / Vol. 48, No. 60 / Monday, March 28. 1983 / Rules and Regulations       12935
 •.Termination
   (a) This subagreement may b« terminated
 in whole or in part in writing by either party
 in the event of lubstantial failure by the other
 party to fulfill its obligations under this
 subagreeroent through no fault of the
 terminating party, provided that no
 termination may be effected unless the ether
 party is given (1) not less than ten (10)
 calendar days' written notice  (delivered hy
 certified mail, return receipt requested) of
 intent to terminate, and (2) an opportunity for
 consultation with the terminating party prior
 to termination.
   (b) Una tubagreement may be terminated
 in whole or in part in writins by the recipient
 for its convenience, provided that the
 contractor is given (1) not less than ten (10)
 calendar days' written notice (delivered by
 certified mail return receipt requested) of
 intent to terminate, and (2) an opportunity for
 consultation with the terminating party prior
 to termination.
   (c) If termination for default Is effected by
 the recipient, an equitable adjustment in the
 price provided for in this subagreement shall
 be made, but (1) no amount shall be allowed
 for anticipated profit on unperformed
 services or other work, and (2) any payment
 due to the contractor at the time of
 termination may be adjusted to cover any
 additional costs to the recipient because of
 the contractor's default If termination for
 default is effected by the contractor, or if
 termination for convenience is effected by the
 recipient the eauitable adjustment shall
 include a reasonable profit for services or
 other work performed The equitable
 adjustment for any termination shall provide
 for payment to the contractor for services
 rendered and expenses incurred prior to  the
 termination, in addition to termination
 settlement costs reasonably incurred  by the
 contractor relating to commitments which
 had become firm prior to the termination.
   (d) Upon receipt of a termination action
 under paragraphs (a) or (b) above, the
 contractor shall (1) promptly discontinue all
 affected work (unless the notice directs
 otherwise), and (2J deliver or otherwise make
 available to the recipient all data, drawings,
 specifications, reports, estimates, summaries
 and such other information and materials as
 may have been accumulated by the
 contractor in performing this subagreement
 whether completed or in process.
   (e) Upon termination under paragraphs (a)
 or (b) above, the recipient may take over the
 work and may award another party a
 subagreement to complete the work under
 this subagreement
   (!) if, after termination for failure of the
 contractor to fulfill contractual obligations, it
 is determined that the contractor had not
 failed to fulfil] contractual obligations, the
 termination shall be deemed to have been for
 the convenience of the recipient In such
 event adjustment of the subagreement price
 •hall be made as provided in paragraph (c) of
 this clause.

 7. Remedies
  Unless otherwise provided in this
•tibagreement, all claims, counter-claims.
disputes and other matters in question
between the recipient and the contractor
 •rising out of. or relating to, this
 subagreement or the breach of it will be
 decided by arbitration If the parties mutually
 agree, or in a court of competent jurisdiction
 within the State in which the recipient is
 located.

 8. Price Reduction for Defective Cost or
 Pricing Data
   [Note,—The following clause applies to (I)
 any subagreement negotiated between the
 recipient audits contractor in excess of
 $100.000: (2) negotiated subagnement
 amendments or change orders in excess of
 fJOHOOO affecting the price of formally
 advertised, competitively awarded, fixed
 price subagreement, or (3) any lower tier
 subagreement or purchase order in excess of
 $100.000 under a subagreement other than a
 formally advertised, competitively awarded,
 fixed price subagreement. This clause does
 not apply to subagreements awarded on the
 basis of effective price competition.]
   (a) 7n* contractor and subcontractor,
 where appropriate, assure that the cost and
 pricing data submitted for evaluation with
 respect to negotiation of prices for negotiated
 subagreements. lower tier subagreements and
 change orders Is based on current accurate
 and complete data supported by their books
 and records. If the recipient or EPA
 determines that any price (including profit)
 negotiated in connection with this
 subagreement lower tier subagreement or
 amendment thereunder was increased by any
 slgifltant sums because the data provided
 was incomplete, inaccurate or not current at
 the time of submission, then such price or
 cost or profit shall be reduced accordingly
 and the recipient shall modify the
 subagreement in writing to reflect such
 action.
   (b) Failure to agree on a reduction shall be
 subject to the remedies clause of this
 subagreement
   [Note.—Since the subagreement is subject
 to reduction under this clause by reason of
 defective cost or pricing data submitted in
 connection with lower tier subagreements,
 the contractor may wish to include a clause
 in each lower tier subagreement requiring the
 lower tier subcontractor to appropriately
 indemnify the contractor. It is also expected
 that any lower tier subcontractor subject to
 such indemnification will generally require
 substantially similar indemnification for
 defective cost or pricing data submitted by
lower tier contractors.}

 9, Audit; Access to Records
   (a) The contractor shall maintain books,
 records, documents and other evidence
 directly pertinent to performance on EPA
 funded work under this subagreement in
 accordance wiih generally accepted
 accounting principles and practices
 consistently applied, and 40 CFR Part 30 in
 effect on the date of execution of this
 subagreement  The contractor shall also
maintain the financial information and data
 used in the preparation or support of the cost
 submission required under 40 CFR 33.290 for
 any negotiated subagreement or change order
 and a copy of the cost summary submitted to
the recipient The United States
Environmental  Protection Agency, the
 Comptroller General of the United States, the
 United States Department of Labor, the
 recipient and (the State] or any of their
 authorized representatives shall have access
 to all such books, records, documents and
 other evidence for the purpose of inspection,
 audit and copying during normal business
 hours. The contractor will provide proper
 facilities for such access and inspection,
   (b) If this is a formally advertised.
 competitively swarded, fixed price
 subagreement the contractor agrees to make
 paragraphs (a) through (g) of this clause
 applicable to all negotiated change orders
 and subagreement amendments affecting the
 subagreement price. In the case of ail other
 types of prime subagreements, the contractor
 agrefts in make paragraphs (a) through (gj
 applicable to all subagnementa he award* in
 excess of $10.000, at any tier, and to make
 paragraphs (a) through (g) of this clause
 applicable to all change orders directly
 related to project performance.
   (c) Audits conducted under this provision
 shall be in accordance with generally
 accepted auditing standards and with
 established procedures and guidelines of the
 reviewing or audit agency(ies).
   (d) The contractor agrees to disclose all
 information and reports resulting from acces;
 to records under paragraphs (a) and (b) of
 this clause to any of the agencies referred to
 in paragraph (a).
   (e) Records under paragraphs (a) and (b)
 above shall be maintained by the contractor
 during performance on EPA assisted work
 under this subagreement and for the time
 periods specified in 40 CFJf f«rt 30. in
 addition, those records whun relate'to any
 controversy arising under an EPA assistance
 agreement litigation, the settlement of claim  i
' arising out of such performance or to costs o
 items to which an audit exception has been   ]
 taken shall Be maintained by the contractor
 for the time periods specified in 40 CFR Part
 30.
   (f) Access to records is not limited to the
 required retention periods. The authorized
 representatives designated in paragraph (a)
 of this clause shall have access to records a'
 any reasonable time for as long as the
 records an maintained.
   (g} This right of access clause applies to
 financial records pertaining to all
 subagreements (except formally advertised,
 competitively awarded, fixed price
 subagreements} and all subagreement chanj
 orders regardless of the type of
 subagreement and all subagreement
 amendments regardless of the type of
 subagreement In addition this right of acee:
 applies to all records pertaining to all
 subagreements, subagreement change order
 and subagreement amendments:
   (1) To the extent the records pertain
 directly to subagreement performance;
   (2) If there is any indication that fraud,
 gross abuse or corrupt practices may be
 involved; or
   (3) If the  subagreement Is terminated for
 default or for convenience.

 10. Covenant Against Contingent FMS
  The contractor assures that no person or
 selling agency has been employed or retain
                                                    C-15

-------
 12936       Federal Register / Vol. 48, No. 60 /  Monday. March  26.  1983  / Rules and Regulations
, ' ." "idt or secure this subagreement upon an
      neat or understanding for a
     • .lissioa. percentage, brokerage or
 contingent fee excepting bona fide employees
 or bona fide established commercial or
 selling agencies maintained by the contractor
 for the purpose of securing business. For
 breach or violation of this assurance, the
 recipient shall have the right to annul this
 agreement without liability or. at its
 discretion, to deduct from th«s contract price
 or consideration, or otherwise recover the full
 amount of such commission, percentage,
 brokerage or contingent fee.

 11, Gratuities
   (a) If the recipient finds after a notice  and
 hearing that the contractor or any of the
 contractor's agents or representatives offered
 or gave gratuities (is the form of
 entertainment, gifts or otherwise) to eny
 official, employee or ageat of the recipient.
 the State or EPA in an attempt to secure a
 tubagreement or favorable treatment in
 awarding,
 determinations related to the performance of
 this subagreement. the recipient may, by
 written notice to the contractor, terminate
 this subagreement The recipient may also
 pursue other rights and remedies that the law
 or this subagreement provides. However, the
 existence of the facts oa which the recipient
 bases such findings shall be in issue and may
 be reviewed in proceedings under the
 Remedies clause of this subagreement.
   fb) IE the event this subagreement is
    runated as provided in paragraph (a), the
    pieat may pursue the same remedies
 -iiainst the contractor as it could pursue in
 the event of a breach of the subagreement by
 the contractor, *nd as e penalty, in addition
 to any other damage* to which it may be
 entitled by law. he entitled to exemplary
 damages in aa »«*ount (as determined by the
 recipient) which ttail be not less than three
 nor more Uiaa ten times the costs >hs
 contractor incurs in providing any such
 gratuities to eny such officer «w employee.

 12. Buy American
   This clause applies only to construction
 sabagnements award under 40 CFR Part 3S
 Suboafts E and I. In accordance with section
 215 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et
 seq.) and implementing EPA regulations, the
 contractor agrees that preference will be
 given to domestic construction material by
 the contractor, subcontractors, materialmen
 and suppliers in the performance of this
 subagreement

 13. Responsibility of the Contractor
   (a} The fallowing douse applies only to
 subagreeateats for services. (1) The
 contractor is responsible for the professional
 quality, technical accuracy, timely
 completion and coordination of all designs.
 drawings, specifications, reports and other
 services furnished by the contractor under
 this subagreement U the *u.bagre«ment
 involves environmental measurements or
 data generation, the contractor shall comply
  •nth EP.1 quality assurance requirements in
 4ft CFR 30.S03. Toe contractor shall, without
 additional compensation, correct or revise
 any errors, omissions or other deficiencies in
his designs, drawing*, specifications, reports
and other services.
  (2) The contractor shall perform the
professional services necessary to
accomplish the work specified in this
subagreement in accordance with this
subagreement and applicable EPA
requirements in effect on the date of
execution of the assistance agreement for this
project
  (3) The owner's or EPA's approval of
drawings, designs, specifications, reports and
incidental work or materials furnished
hereunder shall not in any way relieve the
contractor of responsibility for the technical
adequacy of his work. Neither the owner's
nor EPA's review, approval acceptance or
payment far cay of the services shall be
construed as a waiver of any rights under this
agreement or of any came for action arising
out of the performance of this subagreemeni.
  (4) The contractor shall be, aad shall
remain, liable in accordance with applicable
law for all damages to the owner or EPA
caused by th« contractor's negligent
performance of eny of the services furnished
under this subagreement, except for errors,
omissions or other deficiencies to the extent
attributable to the owner, owner-furnished
data or any third party. The contractor shall
aot be responsible for any time delays in the
project caused by circumstances beyond the
contractor's control.
  (5) The contractor's obligations under this
clause an in addition to the contractor's
other express or implied assurances under
this subagreemsnt or State law and in ao way
diminish any other rjphts that the owner may
have against the contractor for faulty
materials, equipment or work.
  (bj The follmvfng douse applies only to
subagreemexu for construction. [1] The
contractor agrees to perform ail work under
thin subagreeoent in accordance with this
agreement's designs, drawings and
sp^rir rations.
  (2) The contractor guarantees for a period
of at least one (1) year from the date of
substantial completion of the work that the
completed work is free from all defects due to
faulty materials, equipment or workmanship
and that he shall promptly maVe whatever
adjustments or corrections which may be
aecmary to cure any defects, including
repairs of any damage to other parts of the
system resulting from such defects. The
owner shall promptly give notice to the
contractor of observed defects. In the event
that the contractor fails to make adjustments.
repairs, corrections  or other work made
necessary by such defects, the owner may do
10 and charge the contractor the cost
incurred. The performance bond shall remain
in full force and effect through the guarantee
period.
  (3] The contractor's obligations under this
clause are in addition to the contractor's
other express or implied assurances under
this subagreement or State law and in no way
diminish any other rights that the owner may
have against the contractor for faulty
material*, equipment or work.

14. Final Payment
  Upon satisfactory completion of the work
performed uader this subagreement. as a
condition before final payment under this
subagreement or ai a termination settlement-
under this subagreement the contractor shall
execute and deliver to the owner a release of
all claims against the owner arising under, or
by virtue of, this subagreement, except claims
which are specifically exempted by the
contractor to be set forth therein. Unless
otherwise provided in this subagreement. by
State law or otherwise expressly agreed to by
the* parties to this subagreesent. final
payment under this subagreement or
settlement upon termination of this
subagreement shall not constitute a waiver of
the owner's claims against the contractor or
his sureties under this subagreement or
applicable performance and payment bonds.

Subpart G- Protest*

J 3X1105   AppitcalMmy and scope of trite
eubpart
  This subpart sets forth EPA's
administrative process for the rapid
resolution of protest appeals filed with
the award official

$33.1110   Recipient protest procedures,
  fa) Recipients must establish their
own procedures for prompt
consideration of initial protests
concerning their solicitations or contract
awards. A "protest" is a written
complaint concerning the recipient's
solicitation* or award of a subagreement.
It must be filed with the recipient by a
party with a direct financial interest
adversely affected by a recipient's
procurement action (see  5 33.1130
"Review of protest appeal").
  (b) The recipient should review  each
protest received to determine whether it
is appropriate to defer the protested
procurement action.
  (c) If the recipient does not defer the
procurement action, it assumes the risk
that the award official may disallow the
cost of die protested procurement action
if the protest appeal is upheld.

§ 33.1115   Protest appeal.
  (a) A party with a financial interest
which is adversely affected by the
recipient's decision on the initial protest
may file a "protest appeal" with the
award official.
  (b) A "protest appeal"  is a written
complaint filed with the award official
regarding the recipient's determination
of a protest

S 33.1120  Limitations on protest appeals.
  (a) The award official shall not accept
a protect appeal until the protester has
exhausted all administrative remedies at
the recipient level.
  (b) A protest appeal is limited to the
following-.
  (1) Issues arising under the
procurement provisions of this Part, or
                                                              C-16

-------
              Federal Register / Vol 48;  No. 60  /  Monday.  March 28. 1983  /  Rules and Reg-    -JOBS      12937
    (2) Alleged violations of State or local
  law or ordinances where the award
       I determine* that there la an
      •idlng Federal requirement.
  _ k) A recipient of a lower tier
  subagreement (subcontract) may only
  file a protest appeal for issues which
  relate to the award of a subagreement
  by a contractor (see { 33.295
  "Sobagreements awarded by a
  contractor j. *
   (a) Protest appeala most be filed with
 the Assistant General Counsel for
 GraatcfotHeadquartets'-awarded '.
 assistance agreement* and with the
 Office of Regional Conaael for regionally
 awarded aMistanca agreement.
   (b) Apnteat appeal muse
   (1) Bff written:
   (2) Include a copy of the recipient's
 determination of the protest;
   (3) Stats the basis for the appeal: and
   {4} Request a determination under this
 sabpart
   (c) Upon filing a protest appeal with
 the Regional Counsel or Assistant
 General Counsel for Grants, ae
 appropriate, the party filing the protest  .
 appeal most concurrently transmit a
 copy of all protest documents *™^ any
 attachments to all other parties-with a.
      t financial interest which may be- .
         ' affected by the determination
      s protest appeal       •  '
   (d) The award official will only
 consider written protest appeals
 received by the appropriate Counsel's
 office within seven ^imvfa* days after
 the adversely affected party receives the
 recipient*s determination of protest
 However, the adversely affected party
 can meet the seven-day notice •
 requirement by telegraphing the Counsel
 within the seven-calendar-day period of
 its intect-to file a protest appeal.
 provided tha adversely* affected party
 submits a complete protest appeal
 within seven calendar days of the date it
 sends the telegram. If the seventh day
 falls on a Saturday, Sunday or holiday,
 the next working day shall be the last
 day to submit a protest appeal
   (ej Any party which submits a
 document to the award official during
 tha course of a protest appeal must
 simultaneously furnish all other affected
 parties with a copy of th" document.

 } 33.1130 Review ef protect appeal
   (a) If the recipient does not receive the
 initial protest before bid opening or the
 closing date for receipt of proposals, the
       official* may dismiss as untimely
        est appeal based upon alleged
            in the solicitation which
 were dearly apparent before bid
opening or before the deadline for
  receipt of initial proposals. In negotiated
  procurements, protests of alleged
  improprieties which were incorporated
  hi a new solicitation must have been
  received by the recipient by the dosing
  date for receipt of proposals for the new
  solicitation.
   (b) In cases not Involving
  Improprieties in the solicitation, the
  award official may dismiss as untimely
  a protest appeal If the adversely
  affected party did not file the initiaL
  protast with- the recipient within seven
  calendar days of tha date the basis for
  the protest was known or should have
  been known, whichever is earlier.

  J 33.114* Deferral of procurement acton. .
. * When the award official receives a
  protest appeal and the recipient has not
  deferred the procurement action under
  5 33.1110(b), the award official must
 promptly request that the recipient defer
 the protested prncufgmpnt action until
 tha award official notifies the recipient
• of the formal or informal resolution of
 the appeal Toe request shall be limited
 to the award of the subagreement or
 subitem which is the basis of the protest
 appeal

 {33.1748  Award efflcWa rwiew.
   (a) The award official may establish
 rules of procedures or deadlines for the
 submission of materials or the
 arrangement of protest appeal
 conferences.    .             •     -
   (b) The award official may summarily
 rH«mia« an appeal without proceedings
 ttrtf?gy rtflf snbpart iŁ
   (1) The protest appeal is not -
 review-able, see S 33.1130, or addressee
 Issues, other than those allowed under
 $33.1120(0):
   (21 The protester substantially fails to
 comply with the procedural
 requirements of this subpart or
   (3) The protester does not agree to  the
 recipient's request for a reasonable
 extension of the bid and bond period.
   (c) The award official may summarily
 deny a protest appeal without
       lings under this subpart iŁ after
 considering the facts in a light most
 favorable to the protester, the award
 official believes that the protest lacks-
 merit,
  (dJ.Tbe award official will give both
 the recipient and the protester, as well
 aa any other party with a financial
 interest which may be adversely
 affected by the determination of protest
 an opportunity to present arguments in
 support of their views in writing or at a
 conference.
  (e) After the announced date for
receipt of written arguments, tha record
shall be dosed.

                  C-17
   (f) The award official shall review tf e
 record considered by the recipient and
 any-other documents or arguments
 presented by the parties to determine
 whether the recipient has complied with
 the procurement requirements of this
 part and has a rational basis for its
 determination of protest
   (g) The award official's determination
 shall constitute final EPA action from
 which there shall be no further
 administrative appeal No party may
 appeal an award official's determination
 of appeal to the EPA Board of
 Assistance Appeals.         •  '
   (b) Nothing in this subpart precludes
 the award official from reviewing the
 recipient's procurement action; (See
 533415.)
   (i) Noncompliance with the award
 official's determination- of protest shall   .
 be cause for an action against the   .  .
 recipient under 40 CFR  Part 30 or 32.
   (J) If an appeal involves legal issues
 not explicitly addressed by this part the
 award official shall resolve tha issue by
 referring to other protest determinaticT.3
 under this section and decisions of the
 Comptroller General of the United-  .
 States or of the Federal courts
 addressing  Federal requirements.
 comparable to procurement
 requirements of this  pact.
 Appefiooc
 KMipfants Who Do Not Orttfy Tneir
 Piuuuauient System*. or lor R«dpienl» Who
 Have Their ProomaMat C«tification»
 Rooked By EPA
  (a) The following procedural requirement*
 apply to recipient* who;
  (1) Do not certify to EPA that their
 procurement system meets the minimum
 pncarement requirement* ia this part, or
  (2) nave their procurement caTuncao'on
 revoked by the award official,  a* stated in
 } 33.21fi(b).
  (b) TOOM recipients-must comply with the
 requirements ia this part plus the following
 procedural requirement*. These procedural
 requirement* supplement the requirements is
 me sections cited
  (1) To comply with f yt.TXi
 "Documentation," tha recipient oust submit
 to the award official the records required by
 ibis section.
  (2) To comply with S 31290.  "Cost and
 price consideration*," the recipient's
 contractor! and subcontractors must submit
 their cost or price data on EPA Form 5700-11.
 "Cost or Price Summary Format for
 Snbegreements Under U.S EPA Grants.'' or
 m another format which provide* information
 similar to that required by EPA Form STOO-ii.
  (3) To comply with { 33.413, Time for
 preparing bid*," the recipient must allow at
 least 30 day* between the date when it first
 pubusbes the public notice and the date by
 which bids must ba submitted.
  (4) To comply with { 33.415. "Public notice
 and tobdtatioa of bid*," the recipient must
publish the notice in professional journal*,

-------
12938       Federal Register / Vol. 48, No. 60  /  Monday. March 28, 1983 / Rules and Regulations
rarwmpapers. or publication* of general
circulation over t re«jot»ble art* for at lean
30 days before bid opening.
  (5) To comply with i 33.510. -Adequate
public ootica." the recipient mu*t publish the
notice in professional journal*, newtpapen*
or publication* of general orculafloo over a
reasonable ana for at toe* 30 dayi before
the deadline for receipt of propowb. The
recipient may un jMstad public notices or
written ootiScaonn directed to interested
penoa*. finaa or proiesaioaal organizations.
                                              C-18

-------
: 33.235
33.240
33.250
33.255
33.265
33.270
33.275
33.285
33.290
33.295
^33.305-310
33.405-435
33.505-535
33.605
SUBPARTS
C-G
C
0
E
• >
G
PRQPJTS - System procedures must allow only fair and reasonable D'ofits to comracto'i.

SMALL. MINORITY, WOMEN'S. AND LABOR SURPLUS AREA BUSINESSES • System must provide *cr use _- T'V:;:
businesses as specified in this section.
QP.CU. MENTATION • System must require that procurement records and files for purchases over $10,000 inciudt iier-;
specified in this section.
SPECIFICATIONS • Svstem procedures for establishing specifications for products or services to be procured must mes:
requirements of this section.
•
s
BONDING AND INSURANCE • System procedures and requirements related to bondinq and insurance must meet
requirements of this section.
CODE QP CONDUCT - Svstem must have a written code or standards of conduct meeting the requirements of this
section.
FEDERAL COST PRINCIPLES • Svstem procedures for determining allowable costs must comply with the cost
principles specified in this section.
PROHIBITED TYPES OF CONTRACTS - Svstem may not allow use of cost-Dlus-oercentaae-of cost (multiplier* or
percentage-of -construction-cost types of contracts.
QOST AND PRICE CONSIDERATIONS - System procedures must allow for consideration of cost and price as require*
in this section.
SUBAGREEMENTS AWARDED BY A CONTRACTOR - System must provide that the contractor's subagreements
comply with provisions specified in this section.
*
SMALL PURCHASE • System small purchase procedures must meet requirements of these .sections.

FORMAL ADVERTISING - System procedures related to formal advertising, including those for bidding documents
and contract awards, must meet the requirements of these sections.
COMPETITIVE NEGOTIATION - Svstem procedures for competitive negotiation must meet the requirements of thes
sections.
NONCOMPET1TIVE NEGOTIATION • Svstem procedures for noncompetitive negotiation must meet the requtremen-
of this section.
SYSTEM MUST COMPLY WITH REQUIREMENTS IN THESE SUBPARTS:
CLEAN WATER ACT REQUIREMENTS- Subpart applies to procurement under assistance agreements for construct:
of treatment works under the Clean Water Act.
REQUIREMENTS FOR INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION AND OTHER NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION
Subpart describes the procurement requirements for nonprofit organizations.
REQUIREMENTS FOR RECIPIENTS OF REMEDIAL ACTION COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS UNDER THE
COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE. COMPENSATION AND LIABILITY ACT OF 1980-Suboart
describes the additional procurement requirements for recipients of these cooperative agreements. |
SUB AGREEMENT PROVISIONS • Subagreements for procurement under EPA Assistance mint contain the aoproori 1
clauses, or their equivalent, specified in this subpart. 1
PROTESTS • Subpart applies to all applicants for EPA assistance except ftjr nonprofit oroanizations. 1

EPA Form 570O48 (Rm. »-82)
                                                      C-19

-------

-------
                                   APPENDIX  D
OMB Circular A-122 "Cost Principles
   for Non-Profit Organizations"
               D-l

-------
                                                                                                        TEXT
        OMB CIRCULAR A-J22,  "COST PRINCIPLES FOR NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS"
 OFFICE Of MANAGEMENT AND
 BUDGET

        A-122, -Co*1 Prtndpto* for
 AOCNCY: Office of Management aod
 Budget.
 ACTION: Final Policy.


 •UMMAHV: This notice advises of • new
 OMB Circular dealing with principle* for
 determining costs of grand, contricli.
 •nd other agreements with nonprofit
 organizations.
   The Circular is the product of an
 interagency review conducted over a
 two-year period. Its purpose Is lo
 provide a set of cost principles to
 replace existing principles issued by
 individual agencies. These have often
 contained varying and conflicting
 requirements, and created confusion
 among agency administrators, auditor*.
 and nonprofit officials. The new Circular
 will provide a uniform approach lo the
 problem of determining costs, and
 promote efficiency and better
 understanding between recipient* and
 the Federal Government.
 tmcrm DATE: The Circular becomes
 effective on issuance.
 FOfl nMTHIJI MFOffMATION CONTACT
 Palmer A. Marcantonio, Financial
 Management Branch, Office of
 Management and Budget. Washington.
 D.C. 20503. (202) 395-4773.
 »ur«>UMCKTAMY sj«rosmia.TiOM: Before
 the Circular became final there was
 extensive coordination with the affected
 nonprofit organizations, professional
 associations, Federal agencies and
 others. Ail interested persons were
 given an opportunity to comment on the
 proposed Circular through informal
 consultations and a notice in the Fedora!
 Kegister. in response to our requests for
 commsnt. we received about 100 letters
 from Federal agencies, nonprofit
 Organ: za i ions, associations, and other
 Interested members of the public. These
 commons were considered in the final
 verxion of the Circular. There follows a
 summary of the major comments and the
 action taken on each.
  In addition to the changes described.
 other changes have been made to
 improve the clarity and readability of
 the Circular. To 'he extent possible, we
 have tried Ic male the language of this
Circular consistent with that of cost
 principle for educational institutions
 (Circular A-2J), and State jnd local
government! (Circular 74-*).

Summery of Significant Chalet:
  Set foith are changes that have been
made in the final Circular as a result of
 public comments. The more significant
 changes lo the basic Circular and
 Attachment A include:
   1. Paragraph 2- "Supersession" was
 added to the basic Circular lo make it
 dear that this Circular supersedes cost
 principles issued by Individual agencies.
   2. Paragraph 4 of the basic Circular
 has been amended lo make it dear that
 tb« absence of an advance agreement oa
 Any element of coat will not in Itself
 affect the reasonableness of allocability
 of thai element. Also, this paragraph
 was amended to make il dear that
 where An Item of cost requiring prior
 approval is specified in the budget.
 Approval of the budget constitutes
 Approval of the cost.
   3. Paragraph 5 of the basic Circular
 has been dunged to remove Any doubt
 AS to  which nonprofit organizations
 would not be covered by the ""'radar.
 Now, Appendix C to the Circ-ar lists all
 vxdusion*.
   4. Paragraph 6 was added to the basic
 Circular to permit Federal agendes to
 request exceptions from the
 requirements of the Circular.
   5. Paragraph EL2. was added to
 Attachment A to cover the negotiation
 and approval of Indirect coal rates, Aod
 to provide fpr cognizance arrangements.
   The more significant changes to
 Attachment B to the Circular indude:
   1. Paragraph 5, Compensation for
 Personal Services, was modified to:
   A. Permit Federal agendes to accept a
 substitute system for documenting
 personnel coats through means other
 than personnel activity reports.
 ,  b. Clarify provisions covering the
 aUowability of costs for unemployment
 compensation or workmen's
 compensation, and coats of insurance
 policies on the lives of trustees, officers.
 or other employees.
  c. Make unallowable any increased
 costs of pension plans caused by
delayed funding.
  d. Delete a paragraph dealing with
 review «nd approval of compensation of
 Individual employees.
  2. Paragraph 6, Contingencies, WAS
changed to make it dear that the term
 "contingency reserves" exdudes self*
 insurance reserves or pension funds. •
  3. Paragraph 10 was modified to
provide that the value of donated
 services used in the performance of a
direct cost activity shaJJ be allocated a
 •hare of indirect cost only when (aj the
aggregate value of the sen-ice is
 material (b) the services are supported
by a significant Amount of the indirect
cost incurred by the organization, and
(cj the direct cost activity is not pursued
primarily for the benefit of the Federal
Government. Provisions were also  _ .
 •dded to this paragraph for the
 cognizant Agency and the recipient to
 aegotiate when there is no basis for
 determining the fair market value of the
 eervices rendered, and lo permit indirect
 costs allocated to donated services to be
 charged to an agreement or used lo meet
 cost sharing or matching requirements.
  4. Paragraph 31. Equipment and Other
 Capital Expenditures, was changed.
 Capital equipment is  BOW defined as
 having an acquisition cost of $500 and a
 aaeful life of more than two years.
  B. Paragraph 26. Meetings.
 Conferences. The prior approval
 requirement for charging meetings and
 conferences as a direct cost was
 deleted. A sentence was added to make
 It dear such costs were allowable
 provided they meet the criterion for the
 •llowability of cost shown in
 Attachment A.
  6. Paragraph 27. Organization Costs.
 was Amended to provide that
 organization costs may be allowable
 when approved in writing by the
 Awarding agency.
  7, Paragraph 30. Page Charges in
 Professionalfoumc '•. was revised to
 provide that page charges may be
 Allowable.
  8. Paragraph 37. Public Information
        Costs, was modified to make
 public information costs allowable as
 direct costs with awarding agency
 Approval.
  B. Paragraph 43. Rental Costs, was
 rewritten to:
  A. Make it dear that rental costs
 under leases which create a material
 equity on the leased property ere
 Allowable only to the amount that the
 organization would have been allowed
 bad they purchased the properly: e.g..
 depreciation or use allowances,
 maintenance, taxes, insurance, etc.
  b. Clarify the criteria for material
 equity leases.
  10. Paragraph SI, Travel Costs, was
 Amended lo delete the prior approval
 requirement for domestic travel. In
 Addition to the above, a number of
 editorial changes were made to the
 original document.

Suggested Changes Not Considered
Necessary.
  Comment. Several respondents
 questioned the provision that, for "less
 than arm's length" teases, rental costs
 Are allowable only up to the amount ih«i
would be allowed had title lo the
 property been vested  in the grantee
organization. In their opinion this ruie
 will result in unnecessary cost lo thr
 Federal Government,  since it would
encourage an organization to lease
 apace on the commercial market at
 higher rate.
                    Published br THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL. AFFAIRS. INC.. WASHINGTON. D.C. 2OO3?
                                                         n-2

-------
   Re*pi-n*e, The cost principles ira
 designed lo cover mo»l situations:
 however, there are always exceptions
 lhat rouil be considered on • cite-by-'
 cafe basis. The Circular contain! a
 provision for Federal agencies to request
 exceptions.'
   Comment Several respondents
 questioned why Interest la not an
 allowable cost, since It Is an ordinary
 and necessary cost of doing business.
   Response. It has been • longstanding
 policy oot to recognize interest as a cost.
 However, tills policy has recently been
 reviffd for State and local governments
 in Circular 74-4. with respect to the coat
 of office apace. The revision provide*
 .thai "rental" rates for pubtfdy owned
 buildings may be based on actual coats.
 Including depreciation interest,
 operation and maintenaea coats, and
 other allowable costs. This revision was
 under consideration for some time. It
 was studied extensively by OMB. the
 General Accounting Office and other*,
 and considerable analysis went into its
 formulation. Suggestions for extending It
 to nonprofit organizations would have to
 be examined with equal can. This has
 not  yet been done, and we were
 reluctant to further delay issuance of
_this Circular.
   Comment. Several respondents
 questioned why public information costs
 were not allowable as an Indirect coat
   Response. Public information costs
 •re  often direct service* t9«n
 organization's other programs. They an
 allowable, however, at a direct charge
 when they are within the scope of work
 of a particular agreement
~~ Comment. One respondent suggested
 that smaller grantees be excluded from
 complying  with the Circular.
   Response. Similar rules for the SO
 selected items of cost would be needed
 regardless of the size of the grantee. To
 the extent possible, the Circular
 provides simplified methods for smaller
 grantees.
   Comment One respondent said the
 requirements of the Cost Accounting
 Standards Board should be applied to
 cover contracts with nonprofit
 organizations.  *
  Response. It Is unlikely that the type
 of grantees covered by this Circular
 would have contracts large enough to be
 covered by the CASB.  In the event that
 they do. however, the regulations of the
 CASB would apply.
  Comment One respondent said the
 allocation of indirect cost to donated
 services would pose a  tremendous
 difficulty to the organization. The
 organization relies on a corps of
 approximately 6.000 committee members
 to carry out obligations in response to
 Government requests. There U no
 employer relationship in the
 arrangement! for thii assistance, nor are
 there committee member* normally
 reimbursed for such services. Further, it
 was pointed out the committee member*
 spend many thousands of hours outside
 the organization's premises conducting
 research.
   Response. It would appear that this
 type of committee arrangement would
 not be considered In the determination
 of the organization'* indirect cost rate
 provided that Federal agreements do oot
 bear an unreasonable share of Indirect
 coat However, the cognizant agency
 will be responsible for evaluating the
 allocation of Indirect cost when there
 •re committee-type arrangement* oo a
 cmse-by-case basis.
.  Comment One respondent suggested
 that wherever possible the language in
 the Federal Procurement Regulations be
 •sed for nonprofit organisations.
   /tnptfnn The language in the Federal
 Procurement Regulations was
 designated primarily for commercial
 firms, and is not necessarily well suited
 to nonprofit organizations. At  the
 suggestion of the General Accounting
 Office, the nonprofit coat principles
 were written to conform as closely as
 possible to those of educational
 Institutions (Circular A-21), and State
 and local governments (Circular 74-4).
 Chief, financial Managemeal BraaA

 \OKdat No. A-ttt!
 font 17.1980
  To The Heads of Executive
 Departments and Establishments
  Subject Cost prindples for nonprofit
 organizations.
  1. Purpose. This Circular establishes
 prindples for determining coats of
 grants, contracts and other agreements
 with nonprofit organizations. It does not
 apply to colleges and universities which
 are covered by Circular A-21: State.
 local and federally recognized Indian •
 tribal governments which are covered
 by Circular 74-4: or hospitals. The
 prindples are designed to provide that
 the Federal Government bear Its fair
 •hare of costs except where restricted or
 prohibited by law. The prindples do not
 •ttempt to prescribe the extent of cost
 •baring or matching on grants, contracts,
 or other agreements. However, such coat
 •haring or matching shall not be
 accomplished through arbitrary
 limitations on individual cost elements
 by Federal agendes. Provision for profit
 or other increment above coat is outside
 the scope of this Circular.
  1 Supersession. This Circular
 supersedes cost prindples issued by
individual agencies for nonprofit
organization.
  3. Applicability, a. These principle
ahaU be used by all Federal agenciei
determining the costs of work perfor
by nonprofit organizations under gr»
cooperative agreements, cost
reimbursement contracts, and other
coatracts in which costs are uied in
pridng. administration, or settlemen
AH of tEese instruments are hereafre
referred to as awards. The principle!
not apply to awards under which ao
organization is not required lo accou
to the Government for actual costs
Incurred.
  b. All cost reimbursement subawa
(subgrants. subcontracts, etc.) are
subject to those Federal cost prindp
applicable to the particular organiza
concerned. Thus, if • subaward is to
nonprofit organization, this Circular
•hall apply; if a subaward is to a
commercial organization, the cost
prindples applicable to commercial
concerns shall  apply; if a subaward
• college or university, Circular A-Z
•ball apply; If a subaward is to a Sti
local, or federally recognized Indian
tribal government Circular 74-4 aha
apply.
  4, Definitions, a. "Nonprofit
organization*means any corporatio
trust association, cooperative, or ot
organization which (1} is operated
primarily for scientific, educational
service, charitable, or similar purpot
In the public interest (2) is not
organized primarily for profit and (:
oses its net proceeds to maintain.
Improve, and/or expand its operatic
For this purpose, the term "aonprofi
organization" excludes (i) colleges t
universities; (ii] hospitals: (Ui) State.
local and federally recognized Indu
tribal government*; and (iv) those
nonprofit organizations which are
excluded from  coverage of this Circ
in accordance with paragraph 5 bed
  b. Trior approval" means securu
the awarding agency's permission ii
advance to incur cost for those Item
that are designated as requiring pric
approval by the Circular. Generally
permission will be in writing. When
item of cost requiring prior approva
specified in the budget of an award
approval of the budget constitutes
approval of that cost
  fc Exclusion  of some nonprofit
organizations.  Some nonprofit
organizations, because of their size
nature of operations, can be confide
to be aimilar to commercial concern
purpose of applicability of cost
prindptes. Such nonprofit organizat
shall operate under Federal cost
prindples applicable to commercial
concerns. A listing of these
                   Published by THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS. INC.. WASHINGTON. D-C. 2O037

                                               D-3

-------
 organization* i* contained in
 Attachment C Other organizations Bay
 be added from time io time.
   & Responsibilities. Agencies
 responsible for administering program*
 that involve awards to nonprofit
 organizations sbatl implement the
 provisions of this Circular. Upon
 request. implementing Instruction shall
 fee furnished to the Office of
 Management and Budget. Agencies shall
 designate a liaison official to serve as
 the agency representative on matters
 relating to the implementation of this
 Circular. The name and title of such
 representative shall be furnished to the
 Office of Management «nd Budget
 within 90 days of the dale of this
 Circular.
   7. Attachments. The principles and
 related policy guides are  act forth in the
 following' Attachments:
   Attachment A— General Principles
   Attachment B— Selected Items of Cost
   Attachment C— Nonprofit
 Organization* Not Subject to This
 Circular
   B. Reque*tt for exceptions. The Office
 of Management and Budget may grant
 exceptions to the requirements of this
 Circular when permissible under
 existing law. However, in the interest of
 achieving maximum uniformity.
 exceptions will be permitted only in
 highly unusual circumstances.
   i. Effective Dote. Tbe provisions of
 this Circular are effective immediately.
 Implementation shall be phased in by
 incorporating the previsions into new
 •wards made after the start of the
 organization's next fiscal year. For
 existing awards the new principles may
 be applied if an organization and the
 cognizant Federal agency agree. Earlier
 implementation, or a delay in
 implementation of individual provisions
 Is also permitted by mutual agreement
 between an organization  and the
 cognizant Federal agency.
   10. Inquiries. Further information
 concerning this Circular may be
 obtained by contacting the Financial
 Management Branch. Budget Review
 Division. Office of Management and
 Budget. Washington. D.C. 20503.
 telephone (202} 395-4773!
Dinctor,
(Circular No. A-122J
TttUt ofConte/ilt
A. Bask Considerations
1. Cocoposiiioa of lout costs
X. Factors affecting alienability of costs
9. Reasonable co*u
4. AllocaWe co*U
t Applicable credit*
e. Advance understanding*
& Direct Costs

C Indirect Coals

D. Allocation of Indirect Costs and
Determination of Indirect Cost iUtei
1. General
Z. Simplified sUocstioB method
I. Multiple sllocstion bs»« method
4. Direct allocation method
C. Special Indirect cost rates
E. Negotiation and Approval of Indirect Cost
Rales  '
1. Definitions
2. Negotiations aad approval of rate*
(Circular No. A-122]

Aftaezuoanf A

Cecveral PriadpUs

A. Botic Contidtrotiont.
  1 Competition oftoioJoottt. The total cost
of an sward is toe SUB of the allowable
direct aad allocable Indirect costs less any
applicable credit*.
  Z. Factan effecting allowabilitv ofeotts.
To be allowable under an award, eosts must
saeet the following general criteria:
  a. Be res sons ble for the performance of the
award and be ailocable thereto under these
principles.
  b. Conform to any limitations or exclusions
act forth in these principle* or in the sward
as Io type* or amount of coit item*.
  e. Be consistent with oollcie* and
procedure* thsl spply uniformly to both
federally financed aad other activities of the
organization.
  d Be accorded consistent treatment.
  e. Be determined in accordance with
stenerallv accepted accounting principle*.
  f. No! be included a* a coil or u«ed  to meet
cotUbaring or msu^ing requirement* of any
ether federally financed orogajm in either Ihe^
current or s prior period.
  1. Be adequately documented.
  9. Rfatofiable oottt, A coins reasonable
If. in Its nature or amount, ii does not exceed
thai which would be Incurred by a prudent
person under the circumstance* prevailing at
the  time the derialon wa* made to incur the
costs. The question of the restonablenets of
specific cost* must be scrutinized with
particular care in connection with
organizations or separate divisions thereof
which receive the preponderance of their
support from awards made  by Federal
agencies. In determining the reasonableness
of a given cost, consideration shall be given
10:
  a. Whether the cost is of a type generally
tecognited ss ordinary and necessary for the
operation of the organization or the
performance of the award,
  b. The restraint* or requirement! Imposed
by such factors ss generally accepted  sound
Dullness practices, arms length bargaining.
Federal and State laws and regulations, and
atnns and conditions of the award.
  e. Whether the individuals concerned acted
with prudence In the drctunstances.
considering their responsibilities to the
organization. Its members, employees, aad
 client*, tht public al large, and the
 Government.
   d. Significant deviation* from the
 eifsblithed practice* of the organization
 which msy unjustifiably increaae the swsrd
 costs.
   4. Attocoble cost*.           •
   a. A coil i* ailocable to a particular
 objective, such s* s grant, project service, or  •
 Other activity, in accordance with the relative
 benefit* received. A cost i* ailocable Io a
 Government sward if ii la treated
 consistently with other cost* incurred for the
 same purpose in like eircumitance* and if It:
   (1) Is incurred specifically for the sward.
   (2) Benefits both the sward snd other work
 and can be distributed in reasonable
 proportion to the benefit* received.
   (S) Is necessary to the overall operation of
 the organization, although s direct
 felstionship to any particular cost objective
 cannot be shown.
   b. Anxpoal aJ)aeiihl« to m piirtinilitf award
 or other cost objective under the»e principles
 SMV nol be thifted to other Federal award* to
 overcome funding deficiencies, or to avoid.
 ugatrietioni impoagd by law or by the terms
 of the aw>rj.
   S. AppL - -sle credits.
   a. Tbe term applicable credits refers to
 those receipts, or reduction of expenditures
 which operate to offset or reduce expanses
 item* that ire ailocable to award* a* direct
. or indirect costs. Typical example* of such
 transactions are: purchase discounts, rebates
 or allowances, recoveries or indemnities on
 losses, insurance refund*, and adjustment* of
 overpayments or erroneous charge*. To the
 extent that such credit* accruing or received
 by the organization relate to allowable cost
 they thai) be credited Io the Government
 either ss a cost reduction or cash refund
 appropriate.
   b. in some instance*, the amount* recei
 form the Federal Government to finance
 organizational activities or sen-ice operations
 should be treated as applicable credit*.
 Specifically, the concept of netting such
 credit item*  against related expenditures
 should be applied by the orgsnizaton in
 delenning the rates or amount* to be
 organization in determining the rates or
 amaount* to be charged to Federal swards
 for services rendered whenever the facilities
 or other resources used in providing such
 service* have been financed directly, in
 whole or In part by Federal fund*.
   a(c) For rule* covering program Income
 (lit., groi* income earned from federally
 supported setivities) see Attachment D of
 OMB Circular A-110.
   ft. Advance and understandings. Under any
 given award the reasonableness and
 atlocabllity of certain Items of cost* may be
 difficult to determine. Thi* particularly true in
 connection with orgizstion* that receive a
 preponderance of their support from Federal
 agencies. In order to avoid subsequent
 diMUowance or dispute baaed on
 unreatonableness or nonallocability, it is
 often desirable to seek s written agreement
.with the cognizant or awarding agency in
 advance of the incurrence of special or
 nnuaal cost*. The absence of an advance
 agreement on any element of cost will aot in
 Itself, affect  the reasonableness or
 ellocsbility of that element.
eiv^i
                     Published by TWE BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS. INC.. WASHINGTON, D.C. J0037
                                                           P--

-------
  B. Diner Cotlt
    I. three! coat* ar« thot* that can be
  Identified *pecifically with • particular final
  cent objective: I.*. • particular award,
  protect service. or otber direct activity of aa
  organisation. However, • eoat nay not be
  •atigned to aa •win] a* • direct ooet If any
  other coal tacurred (or the Mine purpose. ta
  like ciroumstance. be* been allocated to an
  •ward aa an Indirect ooet Coat Identified
  •pedfieaJly with ewarda an direct eoet of the
  •ward* and an to be assigned directly
  gfcereto. Coat Identified if— ^"illy with other
  fiaaJ ooat objective* of (ht organization an
  direct ooeU of those ooat objective* and art
  MX to be assigned to ocW •ward* directly or
  Indirectly.
    X. Any direct eoet of a minor amognt nay
  be treated u aa indirect ooet ofor reason* of
  practicality wteir the account treatment for
  auch coat i* conaiateatiy applied to all final
  coat objective*.
    S. Tbe ooat of certain actMtie* are aol
  allowable a* charge* to Federal award* (eee,
  lor example, fund raiting coati in paragraph
  tl of Attachment B). However, tree though
  tbe*« ooet* art unallowable for porpoae* of
  computing charge* to Federal award*, Iney
  Boaetheles* must be tn*t»d aa direct coat lor
  purpose* of determining indirect ooat rate*
  and be allocated their *han of the
  organization'* Indirect ooat* if they leprataut
  •ctivltle* which (1] include the aaiariea of
  personnel, (2) occupy tpace. aod (3) benefit
  Don thi arganlzation't indirect coat*.
   4 The co«U of activitie* performed
          art service ip mem oen. cHenls. or
                              '
 the gene-raj public when gjgnincs'nt and
 aecettAry to the organization'* mi»non putt
_b* tre«ted_t» direct co»t* when or not"
 aflowjbTe «ni3 tc allocated an eouitgpfe
 share of indirect cotti. Some exampjei of
 (bete types oTacti viae* include:
   a. Ma intcnsnce pT membership roll*.
 aubjKTiolion*. publication*. and rtli ted
   b. Providing *endoM and Information to '
            f1|lativn>r tdmiru'itrativt
   e. Protaetion. lobbying, and other foffinft of
   d. Meetings and conference* except thoac
 beld to conduct the aeneral adminutration of
   9. Malntenacne. protection, and Investment
of apeefalTunli ncj used in operation 'of tEe~
   f.AdminiiOTition of group benefit* on __
                          including life
            jpiur«f»rji »nnn»y
     , financial aid^
C Indinct CotL
  1. indirect cost* an those mat have been
tecurred for common or }oinl objective* aad
cannot be readily, identified with a particular
final coat objective. Direct ooet of minor
•mount* may be treated at indirect coat*
•nder the conditions described In paragraph
&2. above. After direct coats ban bees
determined and assigned directly ta awards
or other work a* appropriate. Indinct ooata
an thoee remaining to be allocated to
benefiting coat objectives. A cost may not be
allocated n aa award at aa indirect aoet if
any other ooat Incurred lot the same ]
  la like drcwniUncM. ha* bean aaaigned to
  ao award aa a direct ooat.
   S. Becauaa of the diveree characlenatic*
  and accouDtlng pnctioaa of nonprofit
  organization*, tl ta not poaalble to tpecify the
  lypef of ooat which m*y be ckaalfied at
  Indirect ooat ta all actuation. However, typical
  aiimpW of kadirect ooat for naay aoaprofit
  •rganaaaona nay iacfade depradatioD or
  •aa allowance* os hoflding* aad equipment.*
  fee eo*t* of openting and aMintaiaing
  fadlibea. and teaaral adainiitrabaa and
  gauiaral ecpenaea. anch a* the ttlarie* and
  •xpaoaaa of exacattve officer*, peixainol
  •dminittra.lioa.avd ~~—"Irj

 O. Meeaticm afladinct Go* vd
 DftvtawaUan o/Xadbvcf Ce»l Ralet.
   t Canaml
   a. Where a noaprpflt ortanbattoa ha* only
 one major function, or when all it* ma|or
 ninrrtnm benefit from It* mdirect coata to
• approximataly the aatta dagiee. the
 allocation of indirect coat* and the
 •omputatioa of an Indirect ooat rate may be
 eecompUahed throqgh aimptified allocation
 Broeedune aa daacrihfd  in paragraph 2

   b. Wien aa organization ha* *«*ereJ mafor
 fcnctiona which benefit from ita indinct coata
 In varying degnea. aUocadon of Indirect
 co«t* may require  the acotmulatioo of euch
 eoatf into aeparata coat grouping! which then
 are  allocated todMduaUy to benefiting
 funcnon* by maana of a bate which be*t
 »«a*ure* the relative degree of benefit The
 Indirect coata aUocatad to each function an
 then distributed to mdrVidual award* and
 other actirltte* inchtded la thit dunctton by
 •Mini of aa Indirect ooat ntc(s].
   c. The detemiaatioa of what eooatitute* aa
 orgaolratioo'i major function* will depend on
 lu purpose la being: me type* of eervfcce a
 render* to  the public, it* clients, and it*
 •M'mbcta; and the amount of effort It devote*
 to *uch activities a* fund raiting, public
 Information and membership activin'et.
   d. Specific BMtbod* for allocating indirect
Boats aad computing mdirect ooat rate* along
with the condition* under which each method
should be oaed an daecribad in paragraphs I.
 Ihrongh 5 below.
   •.Tbe bate period for the allocation of
indirect coat* U the period in which tuch
eoat* an Incurred and accumulated for
allocation wo work performed In thai period.
The  bate period normally should coincide
with the organization-* Bacal year, but in any
•vat shall be to aelected  a* to avoid
Inequities in the allocation of the coata.
  2, Simplifiod allocation method.
  a.  When aa organization'* aaafor fancaont
benefit from ft* indirect coal* to
approximately the aame degre. the allocanoo
of indirect coats may be accompluhed by (I)
•oparaung dw organisation'* total coat* for
the baa* period as either direct or Indirect
•ad (U) dividing the total allowable Indirect
eoat* (net of applicable credit*) by an
•qvjtable dfetribnbon baaa. Tbe result of this
process la aa mdirect eoat rate which la Meed
to distribute tadincl eeau to individual
•ward*. The rala abowld b* expreaaed a* tka
pen an I ige which the total amount of
allowable mdirect ooatt ba*n to the bate
a*lactad.Tk^m*hodahouldalo*b*BB*d
 where an organizetioe kit only one IE
 function encompcMtng a aiunbar of
 Individual project* or aetiviti**. and B
 •sed where the le»«l of Federal aware
 ortimuu'oo i* relatively tauill.
   b. both the dime! oo*u and tk* tndu
 aoat* thai! tkdud« capita] txpeodiiur
 •naUowable ooata. However, uoallow
 •oat* wfaicfc npreeani activftici nut!
 •BdMUd ia me direct eoat* onder At
 •andition* de*crib*d us paragrapb fL3
   C. The diatribuooo b*** atay be loti
 CD*U (excluding capital evpandiiurc*
 •Cher dutortiAg itamt. each a* major
 wboontract* or anbgraat*}. direct tali
 •ad wage*, or other bat* which ruul
 •qoitabla distribution, Tb* distributio
 •hall generally exclude participant n
 eoat* a* defined, ia parmgnph 28 of
 AtUduaeatB.
   d. Except when a apecial r»t*(i) i*
 required ia accordance with patmgrej
 below, the Indirect cost rat* devabpi
 tb* above principle*  ia applicable ta
 •ward* at the orgaaizatioo. If a spec
 raU(i) ia required, appropriate modi.'
 •hall be mad* ia order to develop U»
   g, Multipk allocation 00** ntthtu
   a. Wben aa organisation'* tndiret
 benefit it* major function* in varyinj
 aucfa ooat* shall be ancurnnltted inter
 eoat grouping*  Each grouping shall t
 allocated individually to benefiting I
 by mean* of a bate which beat SMMM
 relative benefit*.
   b. Tbe grouping* thai! be eatabUsf
 to permit the allocation of each groh
 the bt*i* of benefit* provided to the
 functions. Etch grouping should cot
 pool of expense* that an of like cat
 term* of the functions they benefit I
 •arm* of the allocation bate which I
 meaiurt the relative benefit* profit
 function. Tbe number of separata g>
 should be held within practical luni
 Into conaideration the materiality o
 amounts Involved and the ili'§m o
 deiired.
   c Actual condition* mud be talu
 account In selecting the bate to be
 allocating the expense* in each gro
 benefiting function*. Wben aa allot
 be made by assignment of • coat p
 directly to me function benefited t
 allocation shall be made ia that au
 When the trr-mnt ia a grouping <
 general ia nature, the allocatioa ab
 made through tha u*e of a selected
 which produce* n*ulu that an e
-------
  function thall be egn»gsted and fretted ti •
  common pool for thai function. The coil* in
  the common pool shall then be diilributed to
  indiviiusl a wart Included in that function by
  use of • tingle indirect cott rite.
    t. The diitribution bete used In computing
  the indirect coil rate for etch function mty
  tv total direct coiti (excluding capital
  t -.pendirures and other distorting fietni inch
  a* major subcontracts end lubgranti], direct
  salaries and w«get. or other ate which
  result! in an equitable diitribution. The
  diitribution bate thai) generally exclude
  participant support cottt at defined in
  paragraph 29. Attachment B- An indirect cott
  rate should be developed fir tech acparate
  indirect cott pool developed. The rale IB each
  case thould be tttted a* the percentage
  which the amount of the particular indirect
  coil pool t* of the distribution bate identified
  with that pool.
   4. Direct allocation method.
   a. Some nonprofit organization*, treat all
  cotti  at direct cottt exgpct general
  administration and general expense! Thete
  organizations generally aeparate their cotU
  into thre baiic categories: (i) Genera!
  •dtninii(ration and general expentet. (It)
  fund raiting, and (iii) other direct functions
  (including project* performed under Federal
  •wards). Joint costs, tuch at depreciation.
  rental cotit. operation and maintenance of
  farililiea. telephone expentet, and the like
  are prorated indivisually at direct cott to
  each category and to each award, or other
  activity uting a bate nott appropriate  to the
  particular cott being prorated.
   b. Hut method it acceptable provided each
  Joint oo(t it prorated uting a bate which
  accurately measures the benefits provided lo
  each award or other activity. The batet mutt
  be ettablished la accordance with returnable
  criteria, and be tupported by current data.
  Thii method it compatible with the
 Standardt of Accounting and Financial
 Reporting for Voluntary Health and Welfare
 Organization* fttued Jointly by the National
 Health Council. Inc.. the National Assembly
 of Voluntary Health and Social Welfare
 Organisation*, and the United Way of
 America.
   c Under thlt method, indirect cottt conjitt
 ecluiively of general adminittration and
 general expentet. in ail other reapectt. the
 organization'! Indirect coat rateu tbaJ be
 computed in  the tame manner at that
 described in paragraph D.2 above.
  ft. Special indirect cott rate*. In tome
 instance*, a tingle Indirect coat rate for all
 activities of an organization or for each major
 function of the organizeSon.ty not be
 appropriate, tine* It would not take into
 account tboa< different facton which may
 wbstantially affect the indirect coata
 applicabia to • particular segment of work.
 For this purpose, a particular segment of
 work. For this purpose, a particular segment
 of work may be that perfprmed under a single
 •ward or H may cent it t of work under •
 group of awardt performed in a common
 environment, the facton may Include the
pbyticaJ location of the work, tha level of
•daiiuatratrve snpport required, the nature of
the facilities or order resources employed, the
acienUflc disciplines or technical skill*
snvorved, the orgsniJstUmal arraagemanU
  •ted. or any combination thereof. When a
  particular tegment of work it performed in an
  environment which ippcan to generate a
  algnificantly different Jevel of Indirect cottt.
  provitiont tbould be made for a aeparate
  indirect cott pool applicable to auch work.
  The teptrale indirect cott pool thould be •
  developed during the court* of the regular
  allocation proceit. and tie separate indirect
  cott rate retailing therefrom thould be uted
  provided It It determined that (i) the rata
  differ* tignJRcaxitly Dr>m that which would
  have been obtained under paragraph Di 3.
  and 4 above, and (it) the volume of work to
  which the rate would apply to material

  X. Negotiation and Approval of Indirect Cott
  Kate*.
   1. Definitiont. As ured in thit section, the
  following term* have the meaning! tet forth
  below:
   a. "Cognizant agency" meaju the Federal
  agency retponaible for negotiating and
  approving Indirect cott rate* for a nonprofit
  organization on ben*!/ of all Federal
  ageociea.
   b. "ZEedaienninacLrate" meant an indirect
  coal rate, applicable to a specified current or
  future period, usually the organization'* Btcal
  fear. The rate I* bated on an ettimate of the
  costs to be incurred during the period. A
   c. "Fi»rfl rats:" means an indirect coat rate
 which has the same characteristics as a
 predetermined rale, except that the difference
 WfCfB tht tft..
 Tfdtnl tggnrv with the JSfggit dollar v«lm»
 dctlenaled as the eoenlzant agency for the
-negotiation and approval of Indirect jost
 rates and! where peosssary. rther rates tuch
 »sfrlngebeneflt and computercaarge-out
 rattaaT Qnca amggnry I*
 tor a[particular Mnpr0^1
 it i maioi lonf-term shift ir. Ihy df)!Ja;   	
 oLtiie Fitriyra! award* lo the pfganiuiipr.. All
 concerned Federal sgenciei th*II be given the
 opportunity to participate  in the negotiation
 process, bu! after a rale hat been agree^s^.
 upon it will be accepted by alt Frderal^^H |
 agenciet. When a Federal sgenc) haa^^^ '
 to believe that special operating facton
 affecting its swards Bcceniiatr tpecial
 indirect cott met in accordance with
 paragraph D-5 above. It will, prior to the  time
 the rates are negotiated. noti*> the cogr.-uni
 agency.
  b. A nonprofit organization which hoi no1
 pf.iHrtn.ly ».uKli.h»d'an indirect cot' rale
 •ri
-------
  ~ut. uonmttoat
  IL Empioyet morale, liaalth and walfar*
      oorta and credit*
  li Entertainment oott*
  U. Cquipmeoi and other cepftaJ aapendlture* •
  14. Fine* and penaltie*
  IS. Friage benefit*
  16. Idle fadlitie* and Idle capacity
  V. bdependest reaearcb aad deveJopoeet
      (reaerved]
  U. Infurance aad indemnification
  Jl Inlareit fund rauing. and Inveatmeat
      •anagcmenl oo*t*
  JO. Labor relation* coat*
  XL Loaeea on other award*
  tSL Ktninbenanoe and repair ooat*
  IX Material* aad aupplie*
  24. Meeting*, eon/erenee*
  BS. Moaberthipa. aubtcnptiooa. aad
      profeeafoaaj activity ooat*
  28. Orgaalulion coat*
  V. Overtime, extra-pay abift and araltoaifl
      ptvmiua*
  •L Page ŁB«rge* in profeaaiooa] faaraat*
  2ft Participant aupport coat*
  SO, Patral co*t*
  tL Paaaloa plan*
  S2. Plant aecurity ooata
  ~1 Preaward coat*
  M. Profeaaional aervicc coet*
  24). Profit* aad IOBM* on di*po*ib'on of
     depreciable property or other capital
     •aaeta
 •S. Public mfanBaHoa aervtea eoat*
 17. Publication and printing coat*
 >& Reamng«meat and alteration cc -u
 24. Recon veraion ooat*
 «A JUcrwting cocta
 41. Relocation coat*
 42. Rental cotU
 43. Royvltie* aad otber coat* for aee of
     patent* asd copyright*
 44, Severance pay
 46. Soecialted aervfee tacffitw*
 4&Taxe*
 47. TenninaHon ooata
 48. Trainiog and educatioa coat*
 49. Traniportation coat*
 SO. Travel coata
 'Circular No. A-1ZZJ
             >ofCoat
  Paragraph* 1 through 50 provide principle*
to be applied in e*Ubli*biag tba allowabilitjr
•/certain item* of coat. The** principle*
apply whether a coat i* treated a* direct or
bdirect Failure to enaction e particoltr itaa
of coat i* aot intended io Imply that it ia
tnallowable; ratbar determiaatioo aa to
•tlowabiliry in aadi c**e afaould be ba**d on
the treatment or principle* provided for
      r or related Item* of coat
  a. Adwrtialag ooat* mean m* coata of
      aarvtoea aad auodated coat*. Media
              mio* magarinn*. new*
 miHi Mrvux*. (nij aw diipo**! at wirpla*
 taitritli acqiiired la tb* perio/nance of m»
 •ward exeepi when organiaationi are
 raioiburted for diipoaal* at • prcdiienoified
 •mount In accordance with Attachacal N of
 OMB Ocular A-lltt or ffv) «f»ctfk
 rwquirenient* of tb* award,
   t Bodfcbl* Bad debt*, tedudiof loaaea
 fwhetbei actual or a*o»atedj arlnog from
 aejooUactrble aooooata aad otber claim*.
 related ootUctioo coat*, aad rmlated loyal
 eoau. an anaHowabia.
   S. Sid anfpropc»af oaaO. (raaarvad j
   4. Bonding coat*.
   •, Boadlag coat* aria* wKen the
 financial loa* to iteetf or omen by reaaeo of
 the act or default of tW ortmatn Boo. They
 •rtae ebo b fevtaaoae wher* the arganixabao
 require* efmilar ewanutce. Included are eucb
 bead* a* bid performance, payment.
 advance payment tefrtniament. aad fidelity
 hood*.
   b. Coat* of bonding required pgroanl to
 •to term* of dw award are allowable.
   c Coel* of fr**"**"*. required by tbe
 •ffeatza DOB ta tbe gaearal conduct of It*
 operation* are allowable to the axial that
 auch boadtei b id aooortUnat wfth acnaxl
 boalaeae practice aad the rmiee and premium*
 art icaaooabl* nader (be drecBnataace*.
   S. Gaei/itMueobbn coat*. Cacti incurred far
 telephone aarvicea. bc*J aad long duunc*
 telephone call*, telegram*, radicgxuia.
 poelatf* and the Uka, an allowable.
   & CotrtfKOfation for ptfiaoa/ terriae*.
   a. Definition. Companaatiafl for penoaal
 aervioe* tadnrte* all eompaa*ation paid
 eurtrtitly or accrued by (he organization for
 aervice* of employe** reodcrad during tbe
 period of tfaa award [except aa otfeerwue
 provided In paragraph g. below). It tndadoa.
 but la art United to, aaltrfa*. wage*.
 director*! and executive eoaamJtLM member'*
 feei. Incentive award*, firing* benefit*,
 penatao pUa coata, allowance* for off-ait*
 pay. tocanUva pay, location allowance*.
 Mrdablp pay. aad oo*t of living difTtreatial*.
   b. AHomtulitf. Eatoapt u otharwiae
 apedUBLBally ptoirfkiad in thi* p*nigr*ph tbe
 ooata of Meb mcnpcnxtioo arc allowable to *
 tb* extent that
   (I) Total oonpaaaatlao to tadlvidu*]
 •mploye** If naaooable for tfaa aarvioaa
 naodatad aad aoafonu to tte aatablifbad
 policy o/ tba otjmnlntioo cooiiJlaaUy
 applied to both  Corensotnt aad i
                                            Covemment activltiaa; and
                                              (2) Cb«rye* to award* whether treated ai
                                            direct or indirect ooata an determined aad
                                            mpportad aa required *» &ia paratraph.
ndio and UJrvUtcm progrmaa. diract Bull
•xhiUu, and tbe tike.
  b. Tbe only advertUinf coat* afiowabta ara
fboee wbtcb ara aolely for (i) tbe recruitment
a/panooaei wbm emuidered in ooofunctico
wld> all other recruitment coata. aa aai forth
  (1) When tba orfanlxatioB t» pradominantly
aa<*«ed ID actlvftte* otbar thaa tboae
apoojortd by tfaa Coranunent ooapenaatfoo
far employee* on CoT*rntten(lant poicy of axpanaing achta]
payioeDt* to, or OB behalf of. employ*** or
                   •PubU.hcd by THE BURZAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS. INC.. WASHINGTON. ».C. 20037
                                                   D-7

-------
 former eespkr/ws* (or aoatnploymeat
 compensation or workmen'* compensation.
 such payment* are allowable in the year of
 payment with the prior approval of the
 awarding agency provided they are allocated
 lo ail ectivtti** of iba organisation.
  (4) Coat* of insurance on the live* of
 trustees, officer*, or other employees holding
 rrgf'^"!!* of aimilar reeponslbUity are
 allowable only to the extant that the
 insurance repretents additional
 compensation. The ooets of such Jnsuranoe
 when tb« organisation ii named aa
 beneficiary are eaallowable.
  f. AaanM flat ooets.               v
  (1) Cost* ct aatfgnad ta a grvra fiacal yearv
ere funded for all plan partidpanta within alx
mootha after the end of that year. However.
tacraaae* to normal and paat tervice pentioo
coet* caoaed by a delay in funding the
actuarial Uability beyond 90 day* after each*
quarter of the year to which aach coat* are
ataigaabk are unallowable.
  (2) Peoatoa plan termination tnrarance
premlom* paid portuaat to the Employ**
Retirement income Security Act of 1974 (Pub.
L 83-IOB) are aflowable. Lat* payment
charge* on each nrvminnt are onaUowabla.
   (31 fTfriae t^y^f on
 defidencie* and other penaltiaa impoaed
 mder the Employee Retirement Income
 Security Act art onaflowable,
   h. bncmntir* oompeiuatiaa. mcentive
 ootapooMtion lo employee* baaed on coat
 rednctioB, or efficient performance.
 •mOBeflnB award*, aafaty award*, etc, ere
 allowable to ne extant that the overall
 eoBpataatfon U determined to be reaaonable
 and neb co*t* are paid or accrued purauant
 IB an agreement entared into is good faith
 between the efganiiatiaa and the employee*
 Dexore the tervioet were rendered, or
 pnmtaat lo an eatabliahed plan followed by
 (he organixalioa to conaiatentry aa ta imply.
 B effect an agreement to Bake aueh
payment
  L Overtime. exM per/eA#t OK? waftisA^t
pemmiumt. See paragraph 27s
  L Sere/em* fay. See paragraph 44.
  L Training ana education coats. See
paragraph 48.
  L Support of eofarfae and wagn.
  (1) Charge* to awards for talari** and
•rag**, whether treated as direct ooets or
Bdirect costs, wCl be baaed oa documented
payroll* a^mad by a reepootfblt nffldaUt)
Of the orgeriteatifai The distribution of
•alarie* end wage* to award* Buet be
•epported by pefwjBael activity reports aa
preecrtbed to eobparagnph (21 below, except
when a subetltnte eyvlea hat been apprvred
B writing by the tfae oogrdsant agency. (See
paragraph sU of Attachment A)
  [I] Report* reflecting the distribution of
activity of each employee atiul be
maintained for all itaJT meeaben
(profe*»ional* and nooprofe**ional») who*e
conpenaatioa U charged, in whole or in past
directly to award*. In addition, in order to
•vpport the allocation of Indirect coat*, tueh
report* mual al*o be maintained for other
employee* whoee  work involve* two or more
faadtoa* or actMtie* If a diatributioo of their
eompen*ation between inch function* or
activitia* it needed in the determination of
the organisation'* Indirect coat n.te» (eg,
en employee engaged part-time la indirect
ooat ectivitie* and part-time la a direct
function). Report* maintained by nonprofit
crganiaationa to tatiafy meae requirement*
•Boat meet tfae following ttandarda:
  (a) The report* mu*t reflect aa cfltf-tt*-
/bct determination of the actual activity of
each employee. Budget eatimate* {U,
eettmaU* detenuned before the tervice* an
performed] da act qualify a* rapport for
•barge* to award*.
  (b) Each report Boat account for the total
activity for which employee* are
compeaaaled and which i* required ta
fulfillment of their obligatkxi* to the
qrganfTaflnn
  (c] The reporta nwat be algBed by the
individual employ**, or by a reaprmtihle
•upervUory offidal having fint hand
knowledge of the activities performed by the
employee, mat the diatrlbatton of activity
rvpreaenta a reaaooable eatlmat* of the
actual work performed by tfae employee
during the period* turf aied by the report*.
  (d) The report* But be prepared at leeat
Bonthly and most coincide with one or more
pay period*.
  (9) Charge* for the aalariee aad wage* of
BOBprofeaaloaal employee*, to addition to the
npporting documentation described in
eubparagraph* (1] and (2) above, muat alao
be anpported by record* indicating the total
Bomber of hour* worked each day
maintained la oonfonnance with Department
of Labor regulation* implementing the Fair
Labor Standard* Act (29 C7R Part SIB). For
thi* pnrpoea. the tern -BOBprafeatienal
employee" ahall have the aame meaning e*
"ncnexempt employee." aader the Fair Labor
Standard* Act
  (4) Salarie* aad wage* of employee* need
gŁ rnefftlnfl coal •h*^*^ of nijti*hiftg
requirement* on award* muat be tup ported m
ly^ gji^u Q^QQef •• aaLuiet en^ wage*
claimed for reimburaeaeat from awarding
egende*.
  7. Contingency prvYttiant. Coetribatioo* to
• contingency reterv* or any aimilar
proviaion Bade far event* the occurrence of
which cannot be foretold with certainty a* to
tine, tntenalry. or  with an aaenraace of mek
happening, are unallowable. The term
"contingency reeerve" exclude* eelf-
in*arance  reaenrea (aee paragraph li(3} and
Iia42)
-------
   method* once used ihall not be changed
   unless approved In advance by the cognizant
   Federal agency. When the depredation
   method it introduced for eppu'catioo to asset*
   previously »ub|rd to a use allowance. the
   combination of u*e allowance* and
   depredation applicable to such itttti must
   not exceed (he lotal acquisition oast of tltt
   *«*et*. When the depredation method U used
   for building*. • building '« shell may be
   segregated Iron each building component
   (e.g.. plumbing lytlem. besting. and air
   conditioning system. etc.) and eech lUnj
   depreciated over iu estimated useful life; or
   the entire building (U. the shell tod til
   component*} may be treated af • aiagl* asset
   •nd depreciated over • tingle useful life.
    I When the depredation method IM need
   for • particular das* of assets. no •  .
  depreciation may be allowed on any inch
  •Mel* that, under paragraph a. abova, would
  be viewed •• fully depredated. However, a
  reasonable use allowance nay be Defoliated
  for tucb aueta if warranted after taking into
  conaideratioo the amount of depredation
  previously charged to Ike Government the
  estimated useful life remaining at time «f
  negotiation, the effect of t   increased
  nainteaanoe charge* or oWvased efficiency
  due to age, and any other factor* pa Uncut to
  the utilization of the a*wt for the purpose
  contemplated.
    g. Charge* for uae allowance* or
  depreciation au*t be *upparted by adequate
  property record* and physical inventories
  touat be taken at lean once every two yean
  (a statistical sampling basis la acceptable] to
  ensure thai ataet* exiat and are uaable and
  needed. When the depredation method U
  followed, adequate depreciation record*
  Indicating the amount of depreciation taken
  each period muat also be maintained.
    10. Donation*
    a. Service* received.
    (1) Donated or volunteer cervices may be
  furnished to an  organization by profe*aioaal
  and technical pertonneL ceaaultaati. and
  other (killed and unskilled tabor. The value
                 i        bur
                                                             ttx awud ot u»«f U> meet
                                               (BJ The yaitia of thf tjpp*ta/untoar avrnbas. Rate* for
                                            vohmteen shall b* eocsUtent with those
                                            regular rate* paid for similar work (n other
                                            •ctivida* of the orgaateatioa. la nases where
                                            the kind* of skill* Involved art not found in
                                            the other art vttie*  of the oryaalxation. the
                                            rate* used shall be  consistent with those paid
                                            tat similar work m  the labor market m which
                                            the orguizatioa competes for psch skills.
                                              (b) Servian donated by other
                                            ertanitadonf. When an employer donate* .
                                            the service* of an employee, these service*
                                            •hall he valued at the employee's regular rate
                                            at pay (axdusiv* of fringe benefit* and
                                            ••direct costs) provided the services are to
                                            the same skill for which the employee ia
                                            DoraaUy paid. If the service* an not m the
                                            •am* aid!] for which tha employee U normally
                                            paid, fair market value shall be computed IB
                                            accordance with nbpangnph (a) above.
                                              D. Good* fiflospoco.
                                            .  (1) Donated goods: t«, expendable
                                            persona} Bftr-my /supplies, and donated use
                                            of space may M famished to an organization.
                                            ^tm value f &*      ^      •&»«» i  ot
                                            reimbursable either as a direct or indirect
    (2) The value of the donation* may be used
 %B meet coat sharing or •"lf*<"g share
 requirements under the conditions described
 m Attachment & OMB Circular No. A-110.
 The value of the donations shaJl be
 determined ia accordance with Attachment
 K. Where donations are treated as indirect
 costs, indirect cost raias will separate the
 value of the donations so that reimbursement
 will not be made.
    11. EBiphyvs morale. hecJtti, and welfare.
 eofU and crtdttt. The coats of house
 publications, health or first-aid clinics, and/
 «Infirmaries, recre* flood activities.
 employe*** eoasaaliag service*, and other
 expense* incurred in accordance with the
 organization's established practice or castom
 Cor the improvement of working conditions,
 employer-employee relations, employee
 •oral*, and employee performance are
 allowable. Such costs will be equitably
 apportioned to aH activities of the
 organisation, income generated from any of
 these activities will b* credited to the cost
 thereof unless such income has been
 Irrevocably set over to employee welfare
 organizations.
   12. Entfrtainmait cor At. Cost*  of
 oiuMmeol dlvcnioa sods) activities,
 ceremonial*, aad ooeta relating thereto, such
 ew meala, Inrfglng. rentaJs. trmnaportatioo. aad
 gratuities are unallowable (but see
 paragraph* 11 tod 2S}.
,   13. Equipment and other capital'
 expenditure*.
   a. At «aed in mis paragraph, the fbOowmg
      i have the •"""'»<«- set forth below:
    (1) "Equipment" means an article
  Boaexpendablt tangible personal pc
,  having s useful life of more ihan.twt
  and as acquisition co«t of 1500 or m-
  •nit. An organization may utr its o*
  deflnitioo provided that it at bait in
  •ooexpendable tangible personal pn
  4efin«d herein.
    (2) "Acquisition cost" mesna the D
  fevoice unit price of sja lt«D of equip   1
  toduding the cost of any modificatio
  attachment*, accessories, or anxiliar
  apparatus necetsary to make it usab
  purpose for which It is acquired. Ane
  charges, such as taxes, duty, protecti
  frwtsit insurance, freight and irutuBi
  thai! be included in or excluded froff
  acquisition cott.ln accordance with t
  organization'* regular written  accour
  practice*.
    (3) "Sped*] purpose equipment" m
  equipment which is usable only for n
  medical tdentific, or technical sctivi
  Example* of tpedal pwpoee equips*
  iaclude microscope*, x-ray machine*
  Instruments, and spectrometers.
    {4} "General propose equipment B
  equipment which is usable for ether i
  research. DtdicaL scientific, or techn
  activities, whether or not epedsl
  Modifications are needed to make thi
  Writable for • particular purpose. Exa
  general puipust equipment include oi
  equipment and furnishings, air condJt
  equipment, rtpioductioo tad printing
  •quipment motor vehicle*, and aatoa
  data processing equipment
    b. (1) Capital expenditure* for gene
  purpose equipment are unallowable a
  direct cost exuept with bit prior appn
  the awarding agency.
    (2) Capital expenditure* for  tpeda?
  •quipment are allowable as direct cos
 provided that items with a unit cost oi
 or more have the prior approval of tb«
 •warding agency.
   C Capital expenditure* for land or
 ^Mitig. arc unallowable as a direct i
 except with the prior approval of the
 awarding agency.
   d. Capital expenditures for improve]
 to land, buildings, or equipment which
 Materially Increase their value or usef
 are unallowable as a direct cost excep
 the prior approval of the awarding age
   a. Equipment and other capital
 expenditure* art unallowable a* indlrt
 eoat*. However, tec paragraph 9 for
 eJlowability of «se allowances or
 depredation on buildings, capital
 Improvements, and equipment Also, »
 paragraph 42 for ailowability of rental
 for land, building*, and equipment
   14. Fine* and ptnaltie*. Coat* of fine
 penalties resulting from violations of. c
 failure of the organization to comply w
 Federal Stats, and local law* and regu
 crt unallowable except when incurred
 result of compliance with specific prcr
 el u award or ioatructioaa in writing C
 HM awarding agency.
   1ft. friflfe benefit*. See paragraph ft..
   IB. Me fociJitjet and id It capacity.
   a. As used In this paragraph  the folio
 tarns have the meaning* set forth belcr
   fl) Tadlltiea* means land and build
 any portion thereof, equipment iadivids
                   Published by THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS, INC., WASHINGTON. D.C. 20C37

-------
 or collectively, or any ouier tarunbie capital
 asset, wherever located, ami whether owned
 or leased by the organization.
   12} "Idle facilities" means complexly
 unused facilities that tr» excess to the
 organization'* current need*.
   (3) "Idle capacity" mean* the muted
 capacity of partially used facllitie*. It li the
 difference between that which a facility
 could achieve under 100 per cent operating
 lime on a one-shift bssi* let* operating
 interruption* resulting tram time lott for
 repair*, setups, unsatisfactory materials, and
 other normal delays, and tie extent to which
 the facHlty wa* actually used lo meet
 demands during the accounting period. A
 •uttiahlfl baaia nay be used If II can be
 shown that thii amount of usage could
 normaDy be expected for the type of facility
 Involved.
   (4} "Cotti of Idle fecttiUee or idle capacity"
 mean* cott* iuch a* maintenance, repair.
 housing, rent and other related costs; cj..
 property tatxe*. Insurance, sad depredation
 or use allowance*.
   b. The coats of idle facilities are
 unallowable except lo the extent that
   (1) They are unnecessary to meet
 fluctuation* is workload; or
   (2) Although aot necessary to met
 fluctuation* in workload, they were
 necessary when acquired and are now idle
 because of change* in program requirements,
 efforts to achieve more economical
 operations, reorganization, termination, or
 other cause* which could not have been
 reasonably foreseen. Under the exception
 •tsted in this subparagraph. coats of idle
 facilities are allowable for a reasonable
 period of time, ordinarily not to exceed one
 year, depending upon the initiative taken to
 use. lease, or dispose of such facilities (but
 see paragraphs 47i. and d.).
   c. The costs of idle capacity are normal
 costs of doing business and are a factor in the
 normal fluctuations of us«ge or ipdireci cost
 rates from period to period. Such costs are
 allowable, provided the capacity is
 reasonably anticipated lo be necessary or
 was originally reasonable and is subject to
 reduction or elimination by subletting.
 renting, or saJe. In accordance with sound
 business, economics, or security practice*.
 Widespread idle capacity throughout ma
 entire facility or among a group of asset*
 having substantially the same function may
 be idle facilities.
   17. i'iii yf.-ident srseorcA and development
 (ReservtJi
   18. Insurance and indemnification.
 • a. Insurance include* insurance which the
organization is required to cany, or which is
approved, under the terms of the award and
•ny other insurance which the orgsaiiation
maintains in connection with the general
conduct of its operations. This paragraph
does aot apply to insurance which represents
 fringe benefits for employee* (se« paragraph
B f. and e^-U)).
  Ill Covts of insurance required or
 aprrovexL and maintained, pursuant to the
 ewani «.-* allowable.
   (2) Costs of other Insurance meiiifnined by
 the organisation to cormacMon with the
 general conduct of its operations sre
 allowable sublet lo the foUowiitg limitations.
   (a; lypet and cxlem ot coverage snail CM
 tn accordance with sound business practice
 •nd the rates and premiums shell be
 reasonable under the circumstance*.
   (b) Cost i allowed for butineii Interruption
 or other similar Insurance shaft be limited to
 exclude coverage of management fees.
   (c) Cost* of insurance or of any provisions
 for a reserve covering the risk of loss or
 damage to Government property are
 allowable only to the extent that the
 organization is liable for such loss or damage.
   (d) Provision* for • reserve under • self-
 Insurance program are allowable to the
 extent that  type* of coverage, extent of
 coverage, rates, and premiums would have
 been allowed had Insurance been purchased
 to cover the risk*. However, provision for
. knowo or reesonably etttmeted self-insured
 liabilities, which do  not become payable for
 more then one yesr after the provision is
 made shall  not exceed the present value of
 the  liability.
   
-------
  c./goruuiijon. are unallowable except with
  prior approval of the • wurdiag agency.
    Z7 Ovfrtime. txLro-pay thifl and
  multithift premium*. fVemium* for overtime.
  •xl/4-pay ahj/U, and multiahift work are
  aJi0»«U< only wiih th* piior appruv*! of lh«
  •warding ayeoc} except:
    a. When oeceu&r} lo cope with
  etaeryencif*. *ud> u lbo«c resulting [TDD
  •ua JanU. natural dif aiten. breakdown* of
  •s'-tipmeot. or otcacional operitional
 , bof.'.cae^j of a aporadic nature.
    b. When employe** are perforaitig uulirecl
  function* auch a* *dnufuitraUoo.
   c In (be performiuct of i**U. Ubortlury
 fjruc«dur«c, i* other ajmilor operative* whirl
• •/* uxituuoua to nature tod cannot
 iMsmubly be interrupted or otherwUe
 completed
   d When lower overall coat to the
 Cove.ixmeat will reault.
   2ft. Ajg* cjiajyc* in pnfeitionoi joumalt.
 »Vge cbairge* (or profe*aiooaj journal
 publication* an  allowable aj • ae«e»«aiy
 |*art of reteerch. coal*, where:
   au The fe»e*rca paper* report work
 Mppartad by the Government and
   Ik Tba dtarge* art levied impartially on al)
 research paper* publiabed by the journal
 whether or aot by Government -*pan*ored
 •ulhor*.
   2B. Parlicipoat tuppoft cottt. Participant
 •nppofl co*la art direct coat* for item* »uch
 *s rtpendi or *ull*uttence allowance*. travel
 allowance*. and  regiitraUon fee* paid lo or
 en behalf of participant* or trainee* (bul not
 employee*) in connection with meeting,
 conference*. tynpoaia. or training project*.
 Titete coat* are allowable with (be prior
 approval of tba awarding agency.
   at Coal* of (I) preparing diadoaurea,
 KporU. and other document* required by the
 •ward and of ae«rcLing (be art lo the extend
 DecRsaory to nuke aucb diacloaurei. (il)
 preparing document* and any other patent
 coata la cowiectjoo with the filing and
 pmaetiiUon of* United atates pa lent
 applicalloo wbetr title or royalty-free license
 If rwjutmf by the CovcrnnMrat to be
 conveyed lo the GovermoenL and (iil) generml
 couaaeling aervicet reUliog lo patent and
 oapyriaht matter*, aucb aj advice on patent
 and copyrigiil law*. reyulaUoci. clavue*. and
 employee agreemaata an allowable (bul a««
 paragnpfa 94).
   b. Coal of preparing dladoaure*. reporii.
 awd other documenti and of aearcbing the art
 to the extent neocMary to matte difdntum,
 if Dot rujjuirti b> the award, arc
 •oaL'owable- Q»U in connection with (i)
 filing tad prosecuting any foreign patent
 •pp.'^*tJon. or (li) any United Stalei patent
 •ppliutioc. whttrc the award doe* tivl
 raquira oooveyicg title or • royally-free
 Bceaae to the Government are unallowable
 (aUo aee paragraph 43).
  n. Petition p.'ant See paragraph  0. g.
  K. fleet tfcurity cottt. Necvwary
 ampattfea Incurred to comply with
 Covernewnl accurily rVquiremenU or for
 CacUltie* prol*ctioa. Including wagea.  •
 •njfonn*. and •qulpmant of pertonael are
aOlowable.
    jj  rrLOwaro eot'J Prveward cotti are
  Ihoie incurred prior to !hr effective dale of
  Utc *ward directly pursuant to (Ke
  B*t[oiiition and in anticipation of the award
  where tuch co*U ii necFtiitr)- lo comply with
  the propjMd deUvery ichedaJe or period of
  p«r/onaajice. Such coc* are atlotvab'e only
  lo the ext;nl thai they wojjd have brro
  allowable If incurrrii «fter the d«le of the
  •ward and ooly with the written approve! of
  th« awarding agency.
   *4  Prvfeuiono! terrict eostt.
   a. CotU of piv/i-nionil atd conaultant
  aei vice* i«ndered by peraoni wbo are
  neinUen of a particular profeaaion or poaa«at
  • epecial kLilL antl who ere not officer* or
  aroploya«« of (be organization, are allowable.
  •ubjest lo b. c, and d. of thl» paragraph wbea
  Ma*ooable la relation lo the aervicri
  rerdered and when out  contingent upon
  recovery of the cotu from the Covemment.
   b. la deutn&iitg the allowably of coata in
  • particular caae. no aingle factor or ajiy
  afrtcifl cembination of factor* i* aecciMrily
  detenalnative. However, the following
 fnctor* are rale van L
   (1) The nature and acope of the aanice
 (vndered IB raUtioo lo the acrvice raquired.
   t"< The aeeeaaity of conimctjng for the
 a*-i. io». oaoaidering the organiaatioo'a
 capability in the particuJaj- area.
   (JJ Tbe pan pattere of auch oo*U.
 particularly la the year* prior to Goveruneut
 •ward*.
   (4) Tbe impact of Government award* on
 the organization'* buainet* (Le, what  rcw
 problem* ha ve an*en J.
   (5) Whether the proportion of Covermueni
 «rori to the orgtoiutian't total btuineM i*
 aticfa a* to influence the  organization in favor
 of incurring the co*L particularly where the
••ervice* rendered are not of a continuing
 nature and have little nlaUouhip lo work
 mder Government grant* and contract*.
   (0) Whether the aetvioe CM be performed
 •ore economically by direct employment
 rather than contracting.
   (7) The qualification*  of the individual or
 concern rendering the aerviue and the
 customary fee* charged aspedajjy on aon-
 Covvm&eRt award*.
   (0} Adequacy of the contractual agreement
 for the cervice (e.g.. detoiption of the tervice.
 estimate of time required, rate of
 coapenaaUon. end termination provtc'on*].
   C. b> addition to the factor* in paragraph  b
 above, retainer fee* lo the allowable muil be
 supported by evidence of bona fide •erviee*
 •vailnble or rendered.
  d. Co*I of legal accounting, and consulting
 aervinet. and related oo*t* incurred in
 connection wfth defenae of antitnwt *uit*.
 •nd the proeecution of claiau again*t the
 Government, are unallowable, Co*l* of leg«L
 accounting and coojulting terviee*. and
 related co*ti, incurred in connection with
 petrol infringement litigation, organization
 and reorganization, are unallowable unle«*
 •Hherwlte provided for in the award (but aee
 paragraph 47e).
  35. Profit* and/offft on diipotition of
 depreciable property or other capital oueu.
  a. (Ij Cain* and lo**e* on *ale, retirement.
 or other di*po*ition of depreciable property
 •ball be included In the year in which they
 occur a* credit* or charge* to coat frouplngf«)
 In which the deprrcinlinn appFic
 property wai included. The *rao
 gain or lo»i to be included *i * c
 ch«f>'«- la the ippropriite cott gr
 •hail be the difference between t
 re&lued t"> the properly «nd the-
 undt^rcti*icd b*iit of the prape
  (2) Cain* and lo**ei on. the (ft*
 depreciable proprrfy thaD not be
 •t a *ep*r*te credit or charge urn
 foUowtnf condition*.
  ia| The aain or lo*i i* procet»ei  I
 (fepreci^liofi reterve  arcasnt and
 IB the depreciation allowable und
 paragraph 9.
  (bj Tie property i* gives ia esc
 part of Che  purcha*e price of* no:
 •nd the gain or lot* i* taken into *
 detersirmtg the drprrciaooti co*t
 Dew Item.
  (cj A k»* reaulu {rom the failur
 •aaintaJn penniiiible inturence. e:
 otherwise provided in paragripb I
  (d) Compenaation for the ate of
 property wet provided through u»
 •ilowuce* in lieu of depreciation
 accordance with paragraph 9.
  (e) Cain* and loa*e* ariaing frtm
 •ztreordinary aatcs. retirrment*. o
 di*po*ition* *hall be  couidertd or
 by-caie be*i*.
  b. Cain* or ioe*e* of any nature i
 from  the aele or exchange of prope
 tban the properry covered in parag
 above ihaU be excluded in comput
 co*u.
  S&. Public info.i«ativt> terrier an
  a. Public information acrvice cost
 (ae ooct auociated with pamphlet*
 rele**e*. and other fora* of informi
 •erviee*. Such coeu are nonaatly IB
  (1)  Inform or tnatruct individual*.
 (be general public.
  (2)  Intern!  individual*  or group* i
 pArticipatiBg in a aervice program a
 etgaaitatJuo.
  (3)  Oi**eminate the result* of »poi
 •nd ooncpanaored activitici.
  •b. Public information aervice coeti
 allowable a* direct cott* with the pr
 approval of the awarding agency. Su
 •re unallowable a* indirect co*U.
  97. Publication and printing ootu
  a. Publication cost* include the cot
 printing (including the procene* of
 competition, plate-making, pros wo:
 binding, and the end  product* produt
 •urh proce»*e(). dUtribution. pomot
 mailing, and genera! handling
  b. If them coat* art nst idenfifiabft
 particular co*< objective.  (he> ehould
 allocated a* indirect cott* to «fl ben*
 •clivitic* of the organization.
  c. Publication and printing co*t* an
 unallowable a* direct co«t» ecept wi
prior Approval of the  swardjng »jerrrj
  d. Tlit coil of page nhergp* in joum
•ddre;*ed paragraph 2f
  IB. Rearrangement  ard alteration ex
Co*'* inmrred fcr ordinary or aormal
reamngrmeot and alteration of f*cilit
•Jlowabie. Special •rranpemearand
•Itentioa co*t* icnirred tpecifically fi
project are allowable wi'b the prior tf
of the awarding agency.
  90. Reconvert ion cost*. Cost* incum
the restoration or rehabOiUtion of the
                     Publiched by THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS. FA'C.. WASHINGTON, O.C.  20O37

-------
 organization'* fadlitie* to approximately Ih*
 Mine condition exitting immediately prior to
 conuDtoocBitBl of Govewjent award*, fair
 wear and ts-ar exempted, are allowable.
  40. Atcmiting ceatt. The following
 recruiting eotu are allowable: coal of "kelp
 wanted" advertiilng. operating emu of an
 employment office. cost* of operating an
 educational letting program, travel expense*
 Including food and lodging of employe**
 whil* engaged la recruiting personnel, b-avel
 coat* of applicant* for interview* for
 prospective employment, and relocation cost*
 incurred Incident 10 recruitment of oew
 employ***  (Me paragraph 41 c). Where the
 organization MM employment agencies,
 easts not to exaee* of standard commercial
 rate* for each service* an allowable.
  41. Relocation cattt.
  a. Relocation cost* are oo*t» incident to the
 permanent  change of duty assignment (for an
 indefinite ported or for a stated period of pot
 leu than 12 month*) of an exitting employee
 or ttpon recruitment of a new employee.
 Relocation  ooet* are allowable, subject to the
 limitation described in paragraph! b, c, and d.
 below, provided that:
  (1) The move to for the benefit of the
 employer.
  (2) Reimbursement to the employee to hi
 accordance with an established written
 policy oonttotentiy followed by the employer.
  (3) Tbe reimbursement doe* not exceed the
 employee'* actual (or reaMoably estimated )
 expense*.
  b. Allowable relocation cotU for current
 employe**  are limited to the following:
   (1) The CMta of transportation of the
 employee, member* of bit Immediate family
 and hi* household, tod personal eflecl* to the
 new location.
   (2) The co*ti of finding a aew home. *uch
 •* advance trip* by employee* and spouse*
 la locate living quarter* and temporary
 lodging diving the transition period, up to a
 maximum period  of 30 days, Including
 advance trip time.
  (3) Cicala* co*t*. ndb a* brokerage, legal,
 and appraiaal fees, incident to the di*po*ition
 of the employee'* former borne. The*e co*U.
 together with those described la (4) below.
 are limited to ( per cent of the taJe* price of
 the employee'! former home.
  (4} The continuing coat* of ownership of
 the vacant  former horn* after the settlement
 or leate date of the employee's new
 permanent  home,  rucb a* maintenance of
 building* and ground* (exclusive of fixing up
 expense*).  atilitie*. tax**, and property
 insurance.
  (5) Other necectary and reasonable
 expense* aormaUy incident to relocation.
 such a* the coat* of cancelling an nnexpired
 loaae, disconnecting **"^ reinstalling
 household appliance*, aod  purchaiing
 Insurance again* t  loas of or damage* to
 personal property. The coat of cancelling an
 •nexpired lease to limited to three time* the
 •Kmthly rental.
  e. Allowable relocation coets for new
employee* are limited to tho*a d/acribed in
 (1) and (2) at paragraph b. above. When
 relocation coat* Incurred Incident to the
 recruitment of new employee* hava been
 allowed either as a dinct or Indirect coat ami
 tbe employee resigns for reason* within hi*
control within IX month* after hire, the
ergsuiation thai] refund or credit the
Government for It* share of the cost
However, the co*t* of travel to an oversea*
location shall be considered travel co«ti in
accordance with paragraph SO and not
relocation coat* for the purpose of thi*
paragraph If dependent* art not permitted at
the location for any reason and the co*t* do
not Include coat* of transporting household
food*.
  d. The following tort* related to relocation
are unallowable:
  (l) Fee* and other oo*t» associated with
acquiring • sew home.
  (2) A low on (he sale of • former borne.
  (3) Continuing mortgage principal and
interest payment* on a home being told.
  (4) Income taxet paid by an employee
Klated to reimbursed relocation coat*.
  42. Htntai aottt.
  a. Subject to the ttmitition* deaeribed In
paragraph* b. through d. of thto paragraph.
rental ooat* are allowable to the extent that
the rate* are reasonable In Hght of *uch
factor* at: rental coat* of comparable
property, if any. market ooodlrkms tn the
area; alternative* available; cad the type, life
expectancy, cutuiitioix. end valoa 01 tne
property leased.
  b. Rental coat* under sale and Uaseback
wraageaent* are allowabl* only up to the
amount that would be allowed had tbe
organization continued to own the property.
  c Rental co*tt under lea*>thaa-length
fca*e* are allowable only up to the amount
that would b* allowed had title to the
property veated In the organisation. For thi*
purpose. • le**-lhan-arm*-length lea*e to one
tmder which one party to the lease agreement
to able to control or substantially Influence
die actions of the other. Such leases include.
but are sot limited to thoae between (i)
division* of an organization: (ii) organisations
under common control through common
officer*, directors, or member*: and (iii) an
organization and a director, trust**, officer.
or key employee of the organization or hi*
Immediate family either directly or through
corporation*, traata. or ainilar arrangement*
In which they bold a controlling interest.
  d. Rental coat* under lease* which create a f
material equity In the leased property are
Allowable only op to tbe amount tliat would
be allowed had the organization purchased
the piuperty on the dale the lease agreement
wa* executed: «.g_, depredation or uw
allowance*, maintenance, taxes, insurance
but excluding interest expense and other
unallowable coals. For thto purpose, a
material equity in tbe property extols If the
base In noacaacelable or to cancelable only
upon the occurrence of some remote
contingency and ha* one or nor* of the
following characteristic*:
  (1) The organization ha* tbe right to
purchase the property for • price which al the
beginning of the leas* appear* to be
substantially las*  than the probable fair
market value at the tim* It to permitted to
purchase the piupeity (commonly called a
lease with a bargain porchaw option):
  (2) Title to tbe property passe* to the
organization at acme time during or after die
Igggn period:
  (S) Tbe term of th* laaM (initial term plus
periods covered by bargain renewal options,
if any) Is equal to 75 per cent or more of the
economic life of the ieiied properly: I.e.. the
period the property I* expected to be
economically usable by one or more user*
  4S. Koyoltitt end other co*U for use of
patents and copyright*.               ^^ .
  a. RoyslSei on • pitent or copyright tj^^A )
amortization of the co*t of acquiring by ^^^ '
purchase a copyright, patent, or right*
thereto. n*ce*»*ry for the proper  performance
of the *ward •« *llowible unleta:
  (1) The Government hai * licente or the
right to free use of the patent or copyright.
  (2) The patent or copyright ha* been
•dedicated to be invalid, or has  been
•dminfstratively determined to be Invalid.
  (3) The patent or copyright to coniidered to -
be unenforceable.
  (41 The patent or copyright I* expired.
  b. Special care ihould be exerdwd in
determining reason*blene** where the
royalties may have been arrived  at a* a result .
of Ie*» then arm'* length bargaining: e.g.:
  (1) Royaltiet p*!d to pertbn*. including
corporation*, affiliated with the organization.
  (2) RoyaJtie* paid to nnaffiliated parties.
Including corporations, under an agreement
entered into in contemplation that a .
Government award would be made.
  (3) Royaltie* paid under an agreement
entered into after an award i* made to an
organization.                            .  •
  c In any case involving a patent or
copyright formerly owned by the
organization, the amount of royalty allowed •
ahouid not exceed the co*t which would have.
been allowed had the organization retained
title thereto.
  44. Severance pay.
  a. Severance pay. alio commonly referred
to a* di*mlt*al w*ge*. to a payment in  ^^_
addition to regular «atsrie* and wages. J^^k \
organization* to worker* whole  emplojH^ /
I* being terminated. Co*tt of severance pSy
•re allowable only to the extent  that in each
case, it to required by (i] law. (ii) employer-
employee agreement (iii) established policy  [
that constitutes, in effect an implied         :
agreement on the organization'*  part, or (rv)
circumstance* of the particular employment.
  b. Co«t* of severance payment* are divided '.
into two categoric* a* follows:
  (1) Actual normal trunover severance
payment* *h*D be allocated to all activities-
or. where the organization provide* for a  *
reierve for normal severance* tuch method
will be acceptable if the charge to current
operations i* reatonable in light  of payments
actually made for normal severance* over a
repreienUtive past period, and if amount*
charged are allocated to all activities of the
organization.
  (2) Abnormal or mass severance pay is of
euch a conieetura! nature that measurement
of cost* by mean* of an accrual will not
achieve equity to both parties. Thu*. accru*!*
for thto purpose are not allowable. However.
the Covemmeet recognizes It* obligation to
participate to the extent of it* fair *htre. in
any specific payment. Thus, allowability will
be considered on • ease-by-csse bail* in the
•vent of occunvftCŁ.
  45. Specialised ttrrice fecilitiet.
  a. The coats of service* provided by highly
complex or sp*dalized facilities operated by
the organization, such as electronic   ^^^ \
                    Publi»h.d by THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS.  INC.. WASHINGTON, D.C. 2003?

                                                          D-12

-------
                 7
 provided the charge* /or the aarvion IBM!
 the conditiooi of t ither b. or & of thi*
 paragraph tad in add-tina lake ialo account
 •ay Item* of iaca^ eward* ba»*d oa actaaJ aae^ of
 •tt aervtoea «B the baai* of a achecUe of
 •ale* or eeiafcliahed BMthodology that (I) doe**
 •01 diacriBBiaate igahiit federally supported
 •ctivinaa of the erpwiuBm tadiufcng uae«e
Ay thi crganturtnn far mlamaJ purpoaea. aad
 Pf] <• rtiaigniJ to recover oajy the aggregate
•Mtiof taeaervioe*,Ta»oa»laafaach
•ervice a*aO oomtet naraseHy 4 both IU
aaract OB*** and I* •Bocable ahare  of all
iadtracl ceett. Advaaoa *)greeaasta fniriuint
to paragraph AA of Attachment A are
•artkalariy ieaportaal a btia attnaaan.
  * vVaanfMeoattaaa^lbraaarrtoa
an aot aMtoriaL  (key a»ay be •Oocalad aa
Indirect agela.
                                                b. Coatt coatinujjjg aflat trrmimL'on. IT la
                                              a particular caaa. daapile all raaaooabie
                                              efforti by the oraanUatioe, otrtaia coau
                                              caaaot be diaoootinued laoedlaUly after the
    a. b general, taxaa which the oracnizaaaa
  h required lo pay aad which are paid or
  accrued ta accordance with generally
  accepted accounting principle*, and
  payment* made to local govenmeate in ben
  of taxe* which are onmrnenrorate witb the
  fecal govmaneat aerrfcea racaJvad are
  allowable, except for (i) taxea from which
•  exemption* are available lo the organization
  directly or which are.available to the
  organization baaed oa aa exemption afforded
  the Government and io the latter caae whea
  the ewarding agency make* available the
  aeceaaary exemption certificate*, (11) apecial
  •aaeaameata  on land which represent capital
  improvement*, aad (Hi) Federal income taxe*.
    b. Aay refund of laxea. and any payment to
  the organization of iatereat thereon, which
  «MR allowed a* award coda, will be
  credited either aa a coat reduction or caah
  refund, aa appropriate, to the Government
    47. TtnninoLion ootlt. Termination of
  •ward* generally gtve riae to the tocwrenca
  of coata. or the aeed for apecial treatment of
  eoata, which would not have arieen had the
  •ward not  bees terminated. Coat principle*
  covering theae Item* are eel forth below.
  They are to be uaed ia Gcojunctian with the
  Other proviaioa* of thi* Circular to
  termination aituatiooa.
   a. Common Acme. The coat of item*
 raaaonably ueable oa the organization'* other
 work ahall not be allowable ualea* the
 organization eubmita evidence thai It would
 aot retain auch llama el coat without
 •nttatntag a feet, to deciding whether each
 Menu are reaaooabfy aaabie on other work of
 the organization, the awarding ageocy ahould
 eooaider the organization'* plan* and ordara
 far cBrreai aad acaeduled activity.
 Coat emporaaeoua porcaaae* of common
 (tame by (he organization ahall be regarded
 aa evideao* that each item* are reaaonably
 ejaabie on the organization'* other work. Any
 acceptance of noirnnon iiern* aa alfeeabla to
 B> terminated portion of the a ward ehall be
 acaiud to the  extent that the onaatin'e* of
 each item* on head, to Iranalt. aad on order
 •re to axoaaa of the raaaoaaoie njamfttttive
 MqttireaMBti of other work.
                                                           of termination, eneh coat* are
                                              fenrrally allowaaJe wllUa the 1/MtaUoo* act
                                              fcrtb In tale Qrcular, except the I any auch
                                              onnt» BBrrtma'iM a/tar lamina &OB due to the
                                              •aalifont or wtDful faUhn of the orftutlaaaoa
                                              to dlanmtfmia each oaata thaO be
                                              •nallowable:
                                                «.iaw»ofae«^i/*aJba. tea* of aaarul vafw
                                              e/ipedal teohaf. machlgary aad equipment
                                              which MM e*f ehacped to (ha award aa a
                                              •aprtaj expenditure it feaeratty aJloajahla fŁ
                                                H) S«ch apadaJ tooHa*. awcaiaery.
                                                                    bJy capable afaae ta
                                              *a other work of the praaaautioa.
                                                (2] The tatareat of the Coveraaent ia
                                              avotactad by iraaiifer of ttde or by other
                                                    detmerf aporopriate by the awardiB|
                 •*»**«
 •Bupired IMAM ore gaaantty eflowaUe  •
 Wueie doejrfy aB0wa to have been
 raaaonabJy aaoaaaary far the performance of
 ae terminated a ward ieae Ike raeiduaJ value
 •f and) feaaea, if (1) Ike eaaont of asca rental
 daisied ateee aot exairt tae re*_ooable KM
 valoo of the property laaaad far the period of
 tae award aid eodi fnrther period aa may be
 •naoaable. and fli) the orgejjnancn nakea
 all raaaooable axTuita to terestaate, aeatgit,
 •ettle. or otherwiee redoce the ooet of aach
 leaae. There ahw may be todaded the ooat of
 •heraUoB*ofeBealeaa>d property, provided
 auch alteraHonrwere aeceaaary far the
 performance of the award and of reasonable
 reetoration raiyrtrad by DM pi in'if ifffii of the
 e»e*e.
   a. SeaJmmt aapenaae. Settlement
 tfxpenae* incrodtag the felfewteg are
 generally allowable:
   (1) Accoimtmg, legal derfcal. *sd etmflar
 eoata reatonably aaceeaary for:
   (a) The preparation and preeentaUoo to
 •warding agency of aettlemenl claim* aad
 •upporting data with racpact to the
 terminated portion of the award valea*  the
 termination I* for default. (See paragraph 4-a.
 of Attachment L. OMB  Circular No. A-11B
 •nd
   (b) The UtrmiBaboB aad aenUment of
 •ubawarda.
   (2] Raaconable ooet*  far the atcng«.
 traniportatioa, proiaction. and diapoaitioa of
 property provided by the Government or
 acquired or produced for the award except
 whea grantee* are nrimbvned far diapoaala
 •t a predetermined amount to accordance
 with Attachment N of OMB Circular A-110.
  (3) Indirect poet* related to aalarie* aad
 wage* Incurred aa aettlement expaaae* ia
 •ubparagraph* (1] aad (2] of thi* paragraph.
Normally, auch indirect coat* ahall be liaulad
 to fringe baaefila, ccotpaacy coat, and
temediala euperrlajen.
  L CfaimM ff^^f ttifa a^infi Qalm* tfiA^t
•abawarda. mchtdtng the allocable pornoa of
daima which are """"v*" to the award  aad
to other work of the organization are
generally allowable. Aa appropriate abara of
fee organization'* Indirect expenae may be
allocated to the amount of aatttement* with
•Bbcoatractor/Bubgraaiaea; provided that die
•recant allecatad ia otherwise frtt'-'mf
                                             with the batie fuideliae* cootalned i
                                             Attachment A. The indirect expense
                                             allocated thai! exclude the aame aoc
                                             coat* claiaed directly or indirectly a
                                             aetlleir.:fit eitpeaie*.
                                               tA Training ami tducatioa catti.
                                               a. Coat* of prepare Uoa and aainte
                                             • prograiB of ioitrucD'on inrli.^b^ 00
                                             Ikaltad lo oa-the-|ob. daaaraoa. and
                                             •ppnEDdcBahip training. de*ign*d to t
                                             tfke vocatJo&al afiactive&e** of esopio
                                             fcachKfim traJnl&| nMlerial*. textbook
                                             •aJarie* or wagea of traiaeea («vtMi
                                             •werttavi ffenpenaatinn which mighi i
                                             tfcercfroaii and (i) aaUrie* of the dire
if ooaductad by lac argaaizaciaB; or (i
toittoe aad teea whea the trainiag i* e
toatitutoo aot operated by the argani:
•re aBowabla.
  b. Coat* of parl-tima education, at a
•ndergradaata or poetgradaala miley
Jnrfinting thai provided a! the organic.
•wa facUibaa. are allowable only whi
ccorae or degree poraued i* atka've le
field ia which the employee ia BOW wi
or may raaaoaably be •'p*r*«i* to wa
•re limited to
  (1) Training malarial*.
  (2] Textbook*.
     FftCf Ca^tiracs by thf fffopfT^fmi1*
                                                                                         (4) Tuitioa charged by the educating
                                                                                       laab'tution. or in lieu of tuition, in* true
                                                                                       aalarie* and the r»Uted ahare of todin
                                                                                       coat* of the educ* ^oo*J t&i&tuD'oa to I
                                                                                       extent that the aum thereof i* not ia ea
                                                                                       the tuitioo which would have ben paid
                                                                                       participating educational institution.
                                                                                         (5] Saiariet aad related coat* of inati •
                                                                                       who are employee* of the argasizatiao
                                                                                         (6) Straight-time oompeoaation of a*j
                                                                                       employee for time apcnt etteading claa
                                                                                       during working hour* aot ia axcew of I
                                                                                       Bonn par year and only ta the extent (t
                                                                                       circumatance* do aot permit the oparat
                                                                                       daaae* or attendance at claaaea after n
                                                                                       working hour*: otbarwiac auch crenpe.n
                                                                                       if unallowable.
                                                                                         c Coata of tuition, feea. training mala
                                                                                       and textbook* (but not *ub«iateoce, ul
                                                                                       any other easoluoent*! in connection w
                                                                                       fuU-tia>* education, <"^>"^'"g that prom
                                                                                       the organizatioo'e own faolitiea, at a
                                                                                       poetgraduate (but not undergraduate) e>
                                                                                       level, are allowable only whea the oour
                                                                                       degree punued i* related to the field ia
                                                                                       the employee i* BOW working or Buy
                                                                                       rea*onably be expected to •vk. and at
                                                                                       where the coal* receive the prior appro*
                                                                                       the awarding agency. Such ooata are lis
                                                                                       to the coat* attributable to a loul perioc
                                                                                       to exceed one achool year for each capl
                                                                                       ao trained, la uauaual caaea the period a
                                                                                       be extended
                                                                                        d Coata of attendance of up to M wee
                                                                                       per employe* per year at apeoalized
                                                                                       pragrama *peciŁcally de*ign«d to aolua
                                                                                       the effeco'venet* of execubve* or ataaaf
                                                                                       or to prepare employee* for *uch ft'tir
                                                                                      •re •fiowable. Such coau include earalb
                                                                                      {••a, training materiel*, textbook* aad
                                                                                      related charge*, employee*' aalariea,
                                                                                      •iihaUtence. and travel. Coat* allowable
                                                                                      •nder thia paragraph do aot iacbde too*
                                                                                       nniiiii that are part of a degree ariifiut
                   Publi«Jvrd kr THE BUKKAU Of NATIONAL AFFAIRS, DWC., WASHINGTON, D.C. 21X537

                                                  D-13

-------
 curriculum, which are allowable only to the
 extent »ef forth in b  and c. above.
   e. Maintenance expense, and normal
 depreciation er fair reniaL on fscilitiet
 owned or leaaed by the organization for
 training purpose* are allowable to the extent
 aet forth In paragraph* 0.22. and 42.
   f. Contribution* or donation* to
 educational or training tnstitvlions. Including
 the donation of fsdlltiei or other propertie*.
 and scholarship* or fellowships, are
 unallowable.
   a. Training and education oosta tn excess of
 thnee otherwise allowable aider paragraphs
 b. and c. of this paragraph may be allowed
 with prior approval of the awarding agency.
 To be considered for approval the
 organization Bust demonstrate that such
 eosls are  consistently incurred pursuant to an
 established training and education program,
 and that the course or degree pursued U
 relative to the field la which the employee is
 DOW  working or may reasonably be expectad
 to work.
   49. Transportation eottt. Transportation
 eosts include freight, express, cartage, and
 postage charges relating either to goods
 purchased, in proceaa, or delivered. These
 costs are  allowable. When such costs can
 readily be Identified with the item* Involved.
 they may be directly charged a*
 transportation coats or adkUd to the cost of
 •uch items (see paragraph 23). Where
 Identification with the materials received
 cannr' readily be made, transportation eoata
 may  be charged to the appropriate indirect
 eos! accounts if the organization follows a
 consistent, equitable procedure la this
 respect
   50. Tnmlcottt.
   a. Travel coats are the expenses for
 transportsUoa. ^g^fl  subsistence, and
 rented items incurred by employee* who are
 te travel status oa official business of the
 organization. Travel coats are allowable
 subject to paragraphs b. through a. below,
 when they are directly attributable to specific
 work under aa award or are mcnrred la the
 normal course of administration of the
 organization.
  0- Such coats may be charged oa aa actual
basis, on a per diem or mileage basis in lien
of actual costs Incurred, or oa a combination
of the two. provided the method need results
 tn charge* consilient with thoie normally
 allowed by the organization to Its regular
 Operations.
   C The different* In coil between flnt-dais
 air accommodations and less than first-els**
 air aceomraodsttons It unallowable except
. when less than finl-clas* air
 accommodations are not reasonably
 available to meet necessary mission
 requirements, inch as when less than first-
 dais accommodations would (I) require
 circuitous routing, (ii) require travel during
 vnreasonable hours, (III) greatly increase the
 duration of the flight, (Iv) result in additional
 coats which would offset the transportation
 •aving*. or (v) offer accommodations which
 ere not reasonably adequate for the medical
 needs of the traveler.
   d. Necessary and reasonable costs of
 family movements and personnel movements
 of a special or mass nature are allowable.
 pursuant lo paragraphs 40 aad 41, subject to
 allocation on the basis of work or time period
 benefited when appropriate. Advance
 agreement* are particularly Important
   a. Direct charges for foreign travel costs an
 allowable only when the travel has received
 prior approval of the awarding agency. Each
 separate foreign trip must be approved. For
 purposes of this provision, foreign travel I*
 defined a* any travel outside of Canada and
 the United Slates and Its territories and
 possestions. However, for an organization
 located in foreign countries, the term "foreign
 travel" means travel outside that country.
 [Circular No. A-122)

 Attachment C

 Nonprofit OifaaicatioDs not Subject to thia
 Circular
 Aerospace Corporation. E3 Segundo.
  California
 Argonne Universities Association. Chicago,
  Illinois
 Associated Universities, Incorporated.
  Washington, D.C
Associated Universities for Research aad
  Astronomy, Tucson. Arizona
Atomic Casualty Communion, Washington,
  D.C
Battelle Memorial Institute, Headquartered m
 Brookhaven National Laboratory.
   New York
 Center for Energy and Environmental
   Retearch (CŁŁKj. {Utuvrrsil) o' Kjerts
   Rico)
 Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. Charlei
   Draper Laboratory, Incorporated
 Cambridge, Massschusetts. Corapanrive
   Animal Research Laboratory (CARL)
 (University of Tennessee), Oakndgt.
   Tennessee
 Bnvironmcotal Institute of Michigan. Ann
   Arbor. Michigan
 Hanford Environmental Health Foundation,
   RichJaud. Washington
 ITT Research Institute. Chicago, Ulinoi*
 Institute for Defense Analysis. Arlington.
   Virginia
 Institute of Gas Technology, Chicago. Dlinoii
 Midwest Research Institute. Headquartered
   in Kansas City. Missouri
 Mitre Corporation. Bedford. Massachusetts
 Montana Energy Research and Development
   Institute. Inc. (MERDI). Buttt. Montana
 National Radiological Astronomy
   Observatory. Green Bank West Virginia
 Oakridge Associated Unjversitiea. Oakridge.
   Tennessee
 Project Management Corporation. Oakridge,
   Tennessee
 Rand Corporation. Santa Monica, California
 Research Triangle Institute, Research
   Triangle Park, North  Carolina
 Riverside Research Institute. New York. New
   York
 Bendia Corporation, Albuqaerqne, New
   Mexico
 Southern Research bstfhita, Birmingham.
   Alabama
 Southwest Raeearch Institute, San An
   Texas
 SRI tetaraatfonaL Menlo Park. California
 Syracuse Research Corporation. Syracuse,
   New York
 Universities Research Association,
  Incorporated {National Acceleration Lab).
  Argonne. Blinoi*
Universities Corporation for Atmospheric
  Research, Boulder, Colorado
Nonprofit Insurance Companies such as Blue
  Cross and Blue Shield Organizations
Other nonprofit organizations aa negotiated
  with awarding agencies.
                    Publish.d by THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL. AFFAIRS. INC., WASHINGTON. D.C. 2OC37

                                                             D-U

-------
                                  ATTACHMENT B
                                  riRCULAR NO, A-87
STANDARDS FOR SELECTED ITEMS OF COSTS
               (No.  A-87)
              D-15

-------
                                                     ATTACHMENT E
                                                CIRCULAR NO.  A-67
              STANDARDS FOR SELECTED ITEMS OF COSTS

                        TABLE OF CONTENTS
A.  Purpose and applicability
    1.   Objective	.	    3
    2.   Application	    3

B.  Allowable costs
    1.   Accounting	.	    3
    2.   Adverti sing	    3
    3.   Advisory councils	    4
    4.   Audit service	    4
    5.   Bonding	    4
    6.   Budgeting	    4
    7.   Building lease management	    4
    8.   Central stores	    4
    9.   Communications	    4
    10. Compensation for personal services	    4
    11. Depreciation and use allowances	    5
    12. Disbursing service	
    13. Employee fringe benefits	
    14. Employee morale, health and welfare costs	
    15. Exhibits	    7
    16. Legal expenses	,	    7
    17. Maintenance and repair	    7
    IB. Materials and supplies	    7
    19. Memberships, subscriptions and professional
        activities	    7
    20. Motor pools	    B
    21. Payroll preparation	    8
    22. Personnel administration	    8
    23 . Printing and reproduction	    8
    24. procurement service	    6
    25. 'Taxes.. . , :	    8
    26. Training and education	    9
    27. Transportation	    9
    28. Travel	    9

C.  Costs allowable with approval of grantor agency
    1.  Automatic data processing. .	    9

                            (No.  A-87)
                          D-16

-------
2.  Building space and related facilities	    9
3.  Capital expenditures	   1C
4.  Insurance and indemnification	   11
5.  Management studies	   12
6.  Preagreement costs	   12
7.  Professional services	   12
8.  Proposal costs	,	   12

Unallowable costs
1.  Bad debts	   12
2.  Contingencies	   12
3.  Contributions and donations	   12
4.  Entertainment	   12
5.  Fines and penalties	   12
6.  Governor' s expenses	   12
7.;  Interest and other financial costs	   13
8.  Legislative expenses....	   13
9.  Underrecovery of costs under grant agreements	   13
                       (No. *-87)
                            D-17

-------
              STANDARDS FOR SELECTED ITEMS OF COST
A.  Purpose and applicability.

    !•  Objective.   This  Attachment  provides   standards
determining the allowability of selected items of cost.
for
    2.  Application.  These standards will apply irrespective  of
whether  a  particular  item  of  cost  is  treated  as direct cr
indirect cost.  Failure to mention a particular item of  cost  ir,
the  standards  is  not  intended  to  imply  that  it  is either
allowable or unallowable, rather determination of allowability an
each case should be based on the treatment of standards  provided
for  similar  or  related items of cost.  The allowability of the
selected items of cost is subject to  the  general  policies  and
principles stated in Attachment A of this Circular.

E.  Allowable costs.

    1.  Accounting.  The cost  of  establishing  and  maintaining
accounting   and  other  information  systems  required  for  the
management of grant programs is allowable.  This  includes  costs
incurred  by  central  service  agencies for these purposes.  The
cost of  maintaining  central  accounting  records  required  for
overall  State  or  Indian  tribal  government  purposes, suc
appropriation and fund accounts by the Treasurer, Comptroller,
similar officials, is considered  to  be  a  general  expense
government and is not allowable.
    2.  Advertising.   Advertising  media  includes   newspapers,
magazines,  radio  and  television  programs,  direct mail,  trade
papers, and the like.  The advertising costs allowable are  those
which are solely for:
        a.  Recruitment  of  personnel  required  for  the  gran*
program.
        .b.  Solicitation of bids for the procurement of goods and
services* required.

        c.  Disposal of scrap or surplus  materials  acquired  ir.
the performance of the grant agreement.

        d.  Other purposes specifically provided for in the grant
agreement.
                           (No. A-8?)
                          D-18

-------
    3.  Advisory councils.   Costs  incurred  by  State  advisory
councils   or   committees   established   pursuant   to  Federal
requirements to carry out grant programs are allowable.  The cost
of  like organizations is allowable when provided for in the grant
agreement.

    4.  Audit  service.  The cost  of  audits  necessary  for  the
administration and  management  of  functions  related  to grant
programs is allowable.

    5.  Bonding.  Costs of premiums on bonds  covering  employees
who handle grantee agency funds are allowable.

    6.  Budgeting.    Costs   incurred   for   the   development.
preparation,   presentation,   and   execution   of  budgets  are
allowable.  Costs for services of a  central  budget  office  are
generally   Ł$$  allowable  since  these  are  costs  of  general
government.  However,  where  employees  of  the  central  budget
office  actively  participate  in  the  grantee  agency's  budget
process, the cost of identifiable cervices as allowable.

    7.  BuiIding lease management.  The administrative  cost  for
lease  management  which  includes  review  of  lease  proposals,
maintenance of a  list  of  available  property  for  lease,  and
related activities is allowable.

    8.  Central stores.   The cost of maintaining and operating  a
central   stores   organization   for  supplies,  equipment,  ar.d
materials used either directly or indirectly for  grant  programs
is  allowable.

    9.  Communications.     Communication   costs   incurred   for
telephone calls or service,  teletype service,  wide area telephone
service  (WATS),  centrex,  telpak (tie lines),  postage, messenger
service and similar expenses are allowable.

    10. Compensation for personal services.

        a.  General.   Compensation for personal services includes
all  remuneration,   paid  currently  or  accrued,   for   services
rendered  during  the  period  of  performance  under  the  grar.t
Agreement.  including  but  not  necessarily  limited  to  wages,
salaries,   and  supplementary  compensation and benefits (Section
B.13.).  The costs of such  compensation  are  allowable  to  the
extent  that  total compensation for individual employees:  (1)  is
reasonable for the services rendered;  (2) follows an  appointment
made in accordance with State,  local,  or Indian tribal government

                           (No.  A-B7)
                              D-19

-------
laws  and  rules  and  which  meets Federal merit -system or other
requirements,  where  applicable;  and  (3)  is  determined   and
supported  as  provided  in b. below.  Compensation for employees:
engaged  in  federally-assisted  activities  will  be  considered
reasonable to the extent that it is consistent with that paid for
similar  work  in other activities of the State, local, or Indian
tribal  government.   In  cases  where  the  kinds  of  employees
required  for  the federally-assisted activities are not found in
the other activities  of  the  State,  local,  or  Indian  tribal
government,  compensation  will  be  considered reasonable to the
extent that it is comparable to that paid for similar work in the
labor market in which the employing government competes  for  the
kind  of employees involved.  Compensation surveys providing data
representative of the labor market involved will be an acceptable
basis for evaluating reasonableness.

        b.  Payroll and distribution of time.  Amounts charged tc
grant programs  fc:  personal  services,  regardless  of  whether
treated  as  direct  or indirect costs, will be based on payrolls
documented and provided in  accordance  with  generally  accepted
practice  of  the  State,  local,  or  Indian  tribal government.
Payrolls must be supported by time and attendance  or  equivalent
records   for   individual  employees.   Salaries  and  wages  of
employees chargeable to more than one grant program or other cost
objective will be  supported  by  appropriate  time  distribution
records.    The   method   used   should   produce  an  equitable
distribution of time and effort.

    11. Depreciation and use allowances.

        a.  Grantees may be compensated for the use of buildings,
capital improvements, and equipment  through  use  allowances  or
depreciation.    Use   allowances  are  the  means  of  providing
compensation in lieu of depreciation or other  equivalent  costs.
However,  a  combination  of  the  two methods may not be used in
connection with a single class of fixed assets.

        b.  The computation of depreciation or use allowance will
be based on acquisition cost.  Where actual cost records have not
been  maintained,  a  reasonable   estimate   of   the   original
acquisition cost may be used in the computation.  The computation
-will exclude the cost or any portion of the cost of buildings and
equipment  donated or borne directly or indirectly by the Federal
Government  through  charges  to  Federal   grant   programs   or
otherwise,  irrespective  of where title was originally vested or
where it presently resides.  In addition,  the  computation  will
also  exclude  the cost of land.  Depreciation or a use allowance
              •
                     .      (No. A-87)
                              D-20

-------
on idle or  excess  facilities  is  not  allowable,   except
specifically authorized by the grantor Federal agency.
vhes.
        c.  Where the depreciation method is  followed,   adequate
property  records  must be maintained,  and any generally-accepted
•ethod of computing  depreciation  may  be  used.    However,   the
Method of computing depreciation must be consistently applied for
any   specific   asset  or  class  of  assets  for  all   affected
federally-sponsored programs and must result in equitable charges
considering the extent of the use of the assets for  the  benefit
of such programs.

        d.  In  lieu  of  depreciation,  a  use   allowance   for
buildings  and improvements may be computed at an annual rate net
exceeding two percent of acquisition cost.  The use allowance for
equipment (excluding items properly capitalized as building cost)
will be  computed  at  an  annual  rate  not  exceeding   six .and
two-thirds percent of acquisition cost of usable equipment.

        e.  No depreciation or use charge may be allowed  on  any
assets  that  would be considered as fully depreciated,  provided.
however, that reasonable use charges may be  negotiated   for  any
such assets if warranted after taking into consideration the cost
of  the  facility-  or  iteir,  involved,   the estimated useful life
remaining at time of negotiation, the  effect  of  any  increased!
maintenance  charges  or decreased efficiency due to age, and any
other factors pertinent to the utilization  of  the  facility  c
it err for the purpose contemplated.

    12. Disbursing service.  The cost of disbursing grant program
funds by the Treasurer or other designated officer is  allowable.
Disbursing  services  cover the processing of checks or  warrants.
from preparation to redemption, including the  necessary  records
of accountability and reconciliation of such records with related
cash accounts.

    13. Employee fringe benefits.  Costs identified under a.  and
b.  below are allowable to the extent that total compensation for
employees is reasonable as defined in Section B.10.
         *
        a.  Employee benefits in the form of regular compensation
paid to employees during periods of authorized absences  from  the
job,  such as for annual leave, sick leave, court leave, military
leave, snd the like, if they are:  (1) provided  pursuant  to  an
approved  leave  system;  and  (2)  the cost thereof is  equitably
allocated to all related activities, including grant programs.
                           {No. A-B7)
                           D-21

-------
        b.  Employee  benefits  in   the   form   of
contribution or expenses for social security, employees'     	
health   insurance   plans,   unemployment   insurance  coverage',
workmen's compensation insurance, pension plans,  severance  pay.
and  the  like, provided such benefits are granted under approves
plans and are distributed equitably  to  grant  programs  and  to
other activities.

    14. Employee morale, health and welfare costs.  The costs  of
health  or  first-aid  clinics  and/or  infirmaries, recreational
facilities, employees' counseling services, employee  information
publications,  and  any  related  expenses incurred in accordance
with general State, local or Indian tribal policy, are allowable.
Income generated from any of  these  activities  will  be  offset
against expenses.

    IS. Exhibits.  Costs of exhibits relating specifically to the
grant programs are allowable.

    16• Legal expenses.  The cost of legal expenses  required  in
the   administration  of  grant  programs  is  allowable.   Legal
services furnished by the chief legal officer of a  State,  local
or  Indian  tribal government or his staff solely for the purpose
of discharging his general responsibilities as legal officer  are
unallowable.   Legal  expenses  for  the  prosecution  of  claims
against the Federal Government are unallowable.        •      4j^

    17. Maintenance and repair.   Costs  incurred  for  necessary
maintenance,  repair,  or upkeep of property which neither add te
the permanent value of the property nor appreciably  prolong  its
intended  life,  but keep it in an efficient operating condition.
are allowable.

    IB. Materials  and  supplies.   The  cost  of  materials  and
supplies  necessary to carry out the grant programs is allowable.
Purchases made specifically  for  the  grant  program  should  be
charged  thereto  at their actual prices after deducting all cash
discounts, trade discounts, rebates, and allowances  received  by
the  grantee.   Withdrawals  from  general  stores  or stockrooms
should*be charged at cost under any recognized method of  pricing
consistently  applied.   Incoming  transportation  charges  are a
proper part of material cost.

    19. Memberships, subscriptions and professional activities.

        a.  Memberships.   The  cost  of  membership  in   civic,
business,  technical  and professional organizations is allowable
         •
                           (No. A-87)
                         D-22

-------
provided:   (1)  the benefit  from the membership is related to  the
grant program;  (2) the expenditure is for agency member»hip; (3)
the  coat of the membership  is reaaonably related to the value  of
the  services  or benefits received; and (4) the expenditure is not
for   membership in   an  organization which devotes a substantial
part of its activities to influencing legislation.

        b.  Reference  material.   The   cost   of   books,   and
subscriptions  to  civic,   business,  professional, and technical
periodicals is  allowable when related to the grant program.

        c.  Meetings  and conferences.  Costs are  allowable  when
the   primary  purpose  of   the  meeting  is  the dissemination of
technical information relating to the grant program and they  are
consistent  with regular practices followed for other activities
of the grantee.

     20. Motor pools.  The costs of a service  organization  which
provides  automobiles  to   user  grantee agencies at a mileage or
fixed rate  and/or provides  vehicle  maintenance,  inspection  and
repair services  are allowable.

     21. Payroll preparation.  The cost of preparing payrolls  and
maintaining necessary related wage records is allowable.

     22. Personnel administrati on.   Costs  for  the  recruitment,
examination,     certification,     classification,     training,
establishment of pay standards, and related activities for  grant
programs,  are allowable.

    23. Printing  and  reproduction.   Costs  for  printing   and
reproduction   services   necessary   for  grant  administration.
including  but  not  limited  to  forms,   reports,  manuals,   and
informational  literature,   are  allowable.   Publication costs of
reports or other media relating to grant program  accomplishments
or   results  are  allowable  when  provided  for  in  the  grant
agreement.

    24. Procurement service.  The cost  cf  procurement  service,
including   solicitation   of  bids,  preparation  and  award  of
contracts,  and all phases of contract -administration in providing
goods, facilities and services for grant programs, is allowable.

    25. Taxes.  In general,  taxes er payments in  lieu  of  taxes
vhich   the  grantee  agency  is  legally  required  to  pay  are
allowable.

                 «
                           
-------
    26. Training and education.   The cost of in-service training,
customarily provided for employee development,  which directly  or
indirectly  benefits grant programs is allowable.   Out-of
training involving extended periods of  time  is  allowable
when specifically authorized by the grantor agency.

    27. Transportation.   Costs  incurred  for  freight,  cartage,
express,  postage  and other transportation costs relating either
to goods purchased, delivered, or  moved  from  one  location  to
another are allowable.

    28. Travel.  Travel costs  are  allowable  for  expenses  for
transportation,  lodging, subsistence, and related items incurred
by employees who  are  in  travel  status  on  official  business
incident  to  a  grant  program.  Such costs may be charged on an
actual basis, on a per diem or mileage basis in  lieu  of  actual
costs  incurred,  or  on  a  combination of the two, provided the
method used is applied to an entire trip, and results 'in  charges
consistent  with  those normally allowed in like circumstances in
non-federally  sponsored  activities.   The  difference  in  cost
between  first-class air accommodations and less-than-first-class
air accommodations is unallowable  except  when  less-than-first-
class   air   accommodations   are   not   reasonably  available.
notwithstanding the provisions of paragraphs D.6. and 8.,  travel
costs of officials covered by those paragraphs, when specifically
related  to grant programs, are allowable with the prior approval
of a grantor agency.

C.  Costs allowable with"approval of grantor agency.

    *•  Automatic data processing.  The cost of  data  processing
services  to  grant programs is allowable.  This cost may include
rental of equipment or depreciation on  grantee-owned  equipment.
The  acquisition  of  equipment,  whether  by  outright purchase,
rental-purchase  agreement  or  other  method  of  purchase,   is
allowable  only  upon  specific  prior  approval  of  the grantor
Federal agency as provided under the selected  item  for  capital
expenditures.

    2.  Building space and related facilities.  The cost of space
in privately or publicly owned buildings used for the benefit  of
the  grant  program is allowable subject to the conditions stated
below.  The total cost  of  space,  whether  in  a  privately  or
publicly  owned  building,  may  not  exceed  the  rental cost of
comparable space and facilities in a privately-owned building  in
the  same locality.  The cost of space procured for grant program
usage  may  not  be  charged  to  the  program  for  periods   of

                           (No. A-B7)
                         D-24

-------
nonoeeupancy,
agency.
    without  authorization  of  the  grantor  Federal
            Rental  cost.
                The
                 is
            	  	         rental  cost  of  ftpace   in   a
privately-owned   building   is  allowable.   Similar  costs  for
publicly owned buildings newly occupied on or  after  October  1,
1980,  are  allowable  where "rental rate*1 ay stems, or (equivalent
systems that adequately reflect actual costs, are employed.   Such
charges must be determined on the basis of actual cost (including
depreciation based on the useful' life of the  building,  interest
paid  or  accrued, operation and maintenance, and other allowable
costs).  Where these costs are included in rental  charges,   they
nay  not  be  charged  elsewhere.   No costs will be included for
purchases or construction that were originally  financed  by  the
Federal Government.

        b.  Maintenance and operation.  The  cost  of  utilities,
insurance,   security,  janitorial  services,  elevator  service,
upkeep of grounds, normal repairs and alterations and  the  like,
are  allowable  to  the extent they iare not otherwise included in
rental or other charges for apace.

        c.  Rearrangements and alterations.  Costs  incurred  "for
rearrangement  and alteration of facilities required specifically
for the grant program or those that materially increase 'the  value
or useful life of the facilities  (Section  C.3.)  are  allowable
when specifically approved fey the -grantor agency.
        d.
buildings.
Depreciation and  use  allowances  on  publ icly-ewned
The costs are allowable as provided in Section B.ll.
        e.  Occupancy of gpace under rental-purchase or  a  lease
with  opt i on-to-purcha se  agreement.   The cost of space procured
under such arrangements is -allowable vhen  specifically  approved
by the Federal grantor a'gency.

    3.  Capital expenditures.  The cost -of -facilities,  equipment,
ether capital assets, and repairs which materially  increase  'the
value  or  useful  life  of capital assets is allowable vhen such
procurement is  specifically  approved  by  the  -Federal  grantor
agency.   When  assets  acquired vith Tederal -grant-funds are (a)
aold; (b) no longer available for -use  in  a  federally-sponsored
program;  or  (c) used '-for purposes not authorized by the grantor
agency, the Federal grantor agency'* equity in the asset will  be
refunded  in  the -same proportion as Federal -participation in its
cost.  In case any assets are traded en new items, only  the  net
cost of the newly-acquired assets is -allowable.
      s

                           (Wo. A-87)
                                D-25

-------
     4.   Insurance  and indemnification.

         a.   Costs   of  insurance  required,    or   approved * ..and.
maintained  pursuant to the grant agreement,  are allowable.    -:,'-: :
                                                               ..,
        b.   Costs of.  other  insurance   in  connection  withv th'e-
general   conduct   of  activities  are  allowable  subject   to-'the-
following limitations:                                       _ •

             (1)   Types and extent and cost of coverage will be. is.
accordance  with general State  or  local  government  policy  ar.=;
sound business practice.

             (2)   Costs of insurance or  of  contributions  tc . ar.y
reserve   covering  the  risk  of  loss   of,  or dasaage to,  FedUsrfc
CovernT,»nt  property are unallowable except to the extent that  tfte"
grantor agency has specifically required or approved such  costs?.-.-'-
                                                               • *f ' ~
        c.   Contributions  to  a  reserve  for  a  self-insurance"-
progren   approved  by the Federal grantor agency arc allovabMr- ;te
the exter-t  that the typ« of coverage, extent of coverage,  and  the
rates and premiums would have been  allowed  hcc  insurance 'beer.
purchased to cover the risks.                                rr   '/
        d.  Actual   losses   which  could  have  been  covered
permissible insurance  (through  an approved self-insurance progrS
or  otherwise)   ar*  unallowable  unless expressly provided  for  in
the grant agreement.   However,  costs  incurred because   of   losses
not  covered under nominal  deductible insurance coverage provided
in keeping with  sound  management  practice,  and miner  losses  not
covered   by   insurance,    such    as   spoilage.    breakage  and
disappearancs of  small hand tools which  occur  in  the ordinary
course of operations,  are allowable.

        e-  Inder.ni f i cati on.    Includes  securing   the  grante*.
against  liabilities   to  third  persons  and  other  losses ~*i?t
compensated  by   insurance   or  otherwise.    The  Government ~ Ł>'
obligated  to  indemnify the grantee  only to  the extent expres.siy
provided for in the  grant agreement,  except -as  provided   ahT",  d;.;
above.                                                           <•'

    5.  Management studies.   The  cost of  management  studies   fc
improve  the effectiveness  and  efficiency of  grant management 'for
ongoing programs  is allowable except  that  the  cost  of  studies
performed  by  agencies  other  than   the  grantee  department or
outside consultants is allowable   only  when   authorized  by  the
Feoeral grantor agency.

                            (No. A-87)
                           D-26

-------
     6.  Preagreement  costs.    Costs   incurred   prior   to   the"
 effective  date  of  the  grant  or contract, whether or not they
 would have been allowable thereunder  if  incurred after  such date,..
 are  allowable  when  specifically provided  for  in   the  grant
 agreement.                                              •      ^
                                                               * •*»-*

     7.  Professional services.   Costs of  professional services*
 rendered  by  individuals  or  organizations  not  a  part of the.
 grantee  department  are  allowable   subject   to   such   prior
 authorization as may be required by the  Federal grantor agency. . ;

     8.  Proposal  costs.   Costs  of   preparing   proposals   <*
 potential  Federal Government grant agreements are allowable when
 specifically provided for in  the grant agreement.

 D.   Unallowable costs.                                         ' -  • •
                                                               "-' .-".
     1.  Bad  debts.    Any  losses  arising   from   uncollectible
 accounts and other claims,  and related costs, are unallowable- --

     2.  Contingencies.   Contributions to a contingency  reserve or
 any similar provision for unforeseen  events are unallowable.

     3.  Contributions and donations.   Unallowable.               -.

     4-   Entertainment.   Costs of amusements,  social  activities,
 and  incidental costs relating thereto,  such as meals,  beverages,
 lodgings,    rentals,    transportation,   and   gratuities,    are
 unallowable.                                                    ~
                                                                 i
     5.   Fines  and  penalties.   Costs resulting from violations of;
 or  failure  to  comply with  Federal,   State  and  local  laws  and
 regulations are unallowable.

     6.   Governor's expenses.  The salaries and  expenses  of  the
 Office  of   the Governor of  a  State,  or the chief executive of a
 political subdivision,  are  considered a  cost of general State  or
 local  government  and are unallowable.   However, for a  federally-
 recognized  Indian  tribal  government,  only  that  portion  of  the
 salaries  and   expenses  of  the  office of the chief executive that
 is  a cost of general  government is  unallowable.  The  portion  of
 salaries  and   expenses   directly  attributable  to  managing and
 operating programs by the  chief  executive  and  his  staff  is-
 allowable.   The   allowable  portion   shall  be determined by the
Federal   cognizant   agency    and     the    Indian     government"
representatives on a  reasonable basis.
                           (No. A-87)
                             D-27

-------
               .'.'-'- ' ^ .".  ,'*"*,             '                        *    .*
            7. .1:Inte'restx and  other  financial'  costs.  '.  Interest
        borrowings(however   represented),  bond  dis'counts;   cost
        financing and refinancing  operations, and legal and  professional
        fees   p>i4.;-ijv-.*.^nnertion'-therewith, are unallowable excepvvher.
        authorized'by Cetera! legislation and except as provided  for,  in
        paragraph C. 2. a ^ijof this Attachment.  3..-              ;vV' •   '•'•
                            If • -
          -•^.-g-t '.y'-Le-tal'slatyye expen-ses.   Salaries arid.-ot-her  expenses of t_hr-
        State legislature;.or  *imilajr local govejrnwejital  bodies . such  »r
        county  »upervisorsf ^-ci.ty...councils...school boards,  etc.-, whether
        incurred for-purposes of  legislation:6r executive  direction,  are
        unallowable.    Va     -    •;:-.-.     ':   " "-.:•* ;'  -1"..  .   --^    ••••'••-.{
         -.-  9. ' .^nderreeovery   of  costs  under • grant  agreements.   Any
 *"  "    excess  of  jpostr. over   the  Federal; .^cpntribution under .one. gr.ant
        agreement is^ unallowable under othe^'gir ant-agreements.  .-;  ;..:  •'*••"
' »^  • ™     ™    _.   •     -'     •••             ».*..,.  i  . -.     •* -_     '•*_.•".   „..."..


                                                                         - _ •».-.,
                                      (NO.  A-B7)

-------

-------
                                  APPENDIX  E
OMB Circular A-87 "Cost Principles
 for State and Local Governments"
               E-l

-------
              EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

                 OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
                       WASHINGTON. D.C. 20S03
January 15, 1981
                       CIRCULAR NO. A-87
                           Revised
TO THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND ESTABLISHMENTS

SUBJECT:  Cost principles for State and local governments


1.  Purpose.  This Circular establishes principles and  standards
for  determining costs applicable to grants, contracts',  and ether
agreements    with    State    and    local    governments    and
federally-recognized Indian tribal governments.

2.  Supersession.  This Circular  supersedes  Federal  Management
Circular  74-4  as  revised.   The Circular is reissued under its
original designation of OMB Circular A-87.
3.-  Summary of changes.
Circular.
No substantive changes are made  in  the
4.  Policy  intent.    This  Circular  provides   principles   for
determining  the  allowable  costs  of  programs  administered by
State, local, and federally-recognized Indian tribal  governments
under  grants  from  and  contracts  with the Federal Government.
They are designed to provide the basis for a uniform approach  to
the  problem  of  determining costs and to promote efficiency and
better relationships between grantees and the Federal Government.
The principles  are  for  determining  costs  only  and  are  not
intended  to identify the circumstances nor to dictate the extent
of Federal and State or local participation in the financing of a
particular  project.   They  are   designed   to   provide   that
federally-assisted  programs  bear  their  fair  share  of  costs
recognized under these  principles  except  where  restricted  or
prohibited  by  law.   No provision for profit or other increment
above cost is intended.
                           (No. A-87)
                           E-2

-------
5.  Applicability and scope.

    a.  The provisions of this  Circular  apply  to  all  Federal
agencies  responsible  for  administering  programs  that involve
grants and contracts with State, local, and  federally-recognized
Indian tribal governments.

    b.  Its provisions do not apply to grants and contracts with:

        (1)   Publicly-financed educational institutions  subject
to Office of Management and Budget Circular A-21, and

        (2)   Publicly owned hospitals  and  other  providers  of
medical   care   sxibjecl   to  requirements  promulgated  by  the
sponsoring Federal agencies.

Any other exceptions will be approved by the Office of Management
and Budget in particular cases where  adequate  justification  is
presented.

6-  Attachments.  The principles and related  policy  guides  are
set forth in the attachments,  which are:

    Attachment A - Principles for determining costs applicable to
                   grants and contracts with  State,  local,  and
                   federally-recognized   Indian  tribal  govern-
                   ments .

    Attachment B - Standards for selected items of cost.

7.  Inquiries.  Further information concerning this Circular  may
be obtained by contacting the Financial Management Branch,  Budget
Review  Division,  Office  of  Managemenx and Budget,  Washington,
D.C. 20503,  telephone 202-395-4773.
                                    fines T.  Mclntyrfe,
                                    .rector
Attachments
                           (No.  A-87)
                               E-3

-------
                                       ATTACHMENT A
                                       CIRCULAR NO. A-87
  PRINCIPLES FOR DETERMINING COSTS APPLICABLE

TO GRANTS AND CONTRACTS WITH STATE. LOCAL, AND

FEDERALLY RECOGNIZED INDIAN TRIBAL GOVERNMENTS
                  (No.  A-B7)


                      E-4

-------
           PRINCIPLES FOR DETERMINING COSTS APPLICABLE
         TO GRANTS AND CONTRACTS WITH STATE, LOCAL, AND
         FEDERALLY RECOGNIZED INDIAN TRIBAL GOVERNMENTS

                        TABLE OF CONTENTS
                                                            •.Page
A.  Purpose and scope
    1.  Objectives	   4
    2.  Policy guides	   4
    3.  Application	   4

B.  Definitions
    1.  Approval or authorization of the grantor Federal
        agency		   5
    2.  Cost allocation plan	   5
    3.  Cost	   5
    4.  Cost objective	.'..	   5
    5.  Federal agency	   5
    6.  Federally-recognized Indian tribal governments	   5
    7.  Grant	   Ł
    8.  Grant program	   5
    9.  Grantee	   6
   10.  Local unit	   6
   11.  Other State or local agencies	   6
   12.  Services	   6
   13.  Supporting services	   6

C.  Basic guidelines
    1.  Factors affecting ailowability of costs	   c
    2.  Allocable costs	
    3.  Applicable credits	

D.  Composition of cost
    1.  Total cost	   Ł
    2.  Classification of costs	   6

E.  Direct costs
    1.  General	   6
    2.  Application	   8
                           (No. A-87)
                                  E-5

-------
F.  Indirect costs
    1.   General	    9
    2.   Grantee departmental indirect costs	    9
    3.   Limitation on indirect costs	   10

G.  Cost incurred by agencies other than the grantee
    1.   General	*  10
    2.   Alternative methods of determining indirect cost....   10

H.  Cost incurred by grantee department for others
    1.   General	   11

J.  Cost allocation plan
    1.   General	   11
    2.   Requirements	   11
    3.   Instructions for preparation of cost allocation
        plans	   11
    4.   Negotiation and approval of indirect cost proposals
        for States	   12
    S.   Negotiation and approval of indirect cost proposals
        for local governments	   12
    6.   Negotiation and approval of indirect cost f;pposals
        for federally-recognized Indian tribal governments..   12
    7.   Resolution of problems	   12
                           (No.  A-B7)

                         E-6

-------


-------
         PRINCIPLES FOR DETERMINING COSTS APPLICABLE TO
           GRANTS AND CONTRACTS WITH STATE, LOCAL, AND
         FEDERALLY RECOGNIZED INDIAN TRIBAL GOVERNMENTS


A.  Purpose and scope.
                                                         *-
                                                         f
    1.  Objectives.  This Attachment sets  forth  principles  fcr
determining  the  allowable  costs  of  programs  administered by
State, local, and federally-recognized Indian tribal  governments
under grants from and contracts with the "Federal Government.  The
principles  are for the purpose of cost determination and are net
intended to identify the circumstances or dictate the  extent  cf
Federal  and  State  or local participation in the financing cf a
particular  grant.    They   are   designed   to   provide   that
federally-assisted  programs  bear  their  fair  share  of  ccsti
recognized under these principles,  -except  where  restricted  c:
prohibited  by  law.   No provision for profit cr other increrr.er..
above cost is intended.

    2-  Policy guides.  The application of. these  principles  is
based on the fundamental prerases that:

        a.  State, local, and federally-recognized Indian  tribal
governments  are  responsible  for  the  efficient  and effective
administration  of  grant  and  contract  programs  through   the
application of sound management practices.

        b.  The grantee or contractor assumes the  responsibility
for  seeing  that  federally-assisted  prograr.  funds  have  beer.
expended and accounted for consistent with underlying  agreements
and program objectives.

        c.  Each   grantee   or   contractor   organization,   ir.
recognition of its own unique combination of staff facilities ar.s
experience,  will  have  the primary responsibility for employing
whatever form of organization and management  techniques  may  be
necessary to assure proper and efficient administration.

    3.  Application.  These principles will  be  applied  by  all
Federal  agencies  in determining costs incurred by State,  local.
and federally recognized Indian tribal governments under  Federal
grants and cost reimbursement type contracts (including subgrar.is
and   subcontracts)   except  those  with  (a)  publicly-finances
educational institutions subject  to  Office  of  Management  ar.s
Budget  Circular A-21.  and 
-------
providers of medical care subject to requirements promulgated
the sponsoring Federal agencies.

8.  Definitions.

    1.  Approval or authorization of the grantor  Federal  agency
means   documentation   evidencing  consent  prior  to  incurring
specific cost.

    2.  Cost allocation plan means the documentation identifying.
accumulating, and distributing allowable costs under  grants  and
contracts together with the allocation methods used.

    3.  Cost, as used herein, means cost as determined on a cash,
accrual, or other basis acceptable to the Federal grantor  agency
as a discharge of the grantee's accountability for Federal
    4.  Cost objective means a pool, center, or area  established
for  the accumulation of cost.  Such areas include organizational
units, functions,  objects  or  items  of  expense,  as  well  as
ultimate  cost  objectives  including  specific grants, projects.
contracts, and other activities.

    5-  Federal agency means any department, agency,  commission,
or  instrumentality  in  the  executive  branch  of  the  Fede«k<
Government which makes grants to or contracts with State,  loca^P,
or federally-recognized Indian tribal governments.

    6.  Federaily*fecognized Indian tribal governments means  the
governing  body  or  a  governmental  agency of any Indian tribe.
band, nation, or other organized group  or  community  (including
any  native  village as defined in Section 3 of the Alaska Native
Claims Settlement Act, 65 Stat. 688) certified by  the  Secretary
of the Interior as eligible for the special programs and services
provided by him through the Bureau of Indian Affairs.

    7.  Grant means an agreement between the  Federal  Government
and   a  State,  local,  or  federally-recognized  Indian  tribal
government whereby the Federal Government provides funds  or  aid
in kind to carry out specified programs, services, or ertivixies.
The principles and policies stated in this Circular as applicable
to  grants  in general also apply to any federally-sponsored cost
reimbursement-type of agreement performed by a State.  local.  or
federally-recognized Indian tribal government.

    6.  Grant program means those activ:,..ies  and  operations  of
the  grantee which are necessary to carry out the purposes of the

                            (No. A-87)
                           E-8

-------
 grant,  including any portion  of  the  program  financed  by  the
 grantee.

     9.   Grantee Means the department or agency of   State,   local,
 or   federally  recognised  Indian  tribal   government   which  IE
 responsible for administration of  the grant.
                                                           •

     *°-  Loesi  unit means  any political.subdivision of   government
 below the State level.

     **•  Other   State  or   local  agencies  means   departments  or
 agencies  of  the  State   or  local   unit  which   provide   goods.
 facilities,  and services  to  a grantee.

     22.  Services,  as used herein,  means goods  and  facilities,   mt
 well as  services.

     23.  Supporting services  means  auxiliary  functions  necessary
 to  sustain the  direct  effort  involved an administering  a grant
 program  or  an  activity providing service to  the   grant  prograr..
 these services may be centralized  in  the grantee department or an
 some other  agency,  and include  procurement, payroll, personnel
 functions, maintenance and operation  of space,  data  processing,
 accountang,  budgeting, auditing,  mail and messenger service, and
 the  like.

 C.   Basic guidelines.

     1-  Factors  affecting  allowability of costs.  To be allowable
 under a grar.t  program, costs  must  meet  the  following  general
 criteria:

        a.  Be necessary and reasonable for proper and  efficient
 administration   of the grant programs, be allocable thereto under
 these principles, and, except as  specifically  provided  herein,
not  be  a  general  expense  required  to  carry out the overall
 responsibilities of State, local, or federally-recognized  Indian
 tribal governments.

        b.  Be authorized or not prohibited under State or  local
 laws or regulations.

        c.  Conform to any limitations or exclusion* set forth an
these principles, Federal laws, or other governing limitation* as
to types or amounts of cost items.
                           
-------
        d.  B*  consistent  vith   policies.   regulations,   and
procedures  thtt  apply  uniformly to both federally assisted
ether activities of the unit of government of which  the  grant
is a part.
                                                          Ł»)
        e.  Be accorded consistent treatment through  application
of  generally  accepted  accounting principles appropriate to the
circumstances.

        f.  Not be allocable to or included  as  a  cost  of  any
ether federally financed prograir in either the current or a prior
period.       '                                                .
2.
        g.  Be net ef all applicable credits.

        Allocable costs.
        a.  A cost is allocable to a particular cost objective tc
the extent ef benefits received by such objective.

        b.  Any cost allocable to  a  particular  grant  er  cost
objective  under the principles provided for in this Circulsr may
net be shifted to ether Federal grant programs to  overcome  fund
deficiencies,   avoid   restrictions  imposed  by  lav  or  grant
agreements, or for other reasons.

        c.  Where an allocation of  joint  cost  will  ultimate
result  in charges to a grant program, an allocation plan will
required as prescribed in Section J.                    .

    3.  Applicable credits.

        a.  Applicable  credits  refer  to  those   receipts   or
reduction of expenditure- type transactions vhich offset er reduce
expense  items  allocable  to grants as direct er indirect costs.
Examples ef such transactions are:   purchase  discounts;   rebates
er  allowances,   recoveries  or  indemnities  en  losses;  sale of
publications, equipment,   and  scrap;   income  from  personal  er
incidental services;  and adjustments ef overpayments er erroneeu*
charges.
          «
        b.  Applicable credits may also arise when Federsl  funds
are  received  er are available from sources ether than the grant
program involved to finance operations or  capital   items   ef  the
grantee.    This   includes   eests   arising  from  the  use  er
c'Lpreciation  of  items  donated  er  financed  by  the   Federal
Government  to  fulfill matching requirements under another grant

                           (No. A~67)
                             E-10

-------
program.  These types of  credits  should  likewise  be  used  to
reduce  related  expenditures in determining the ratea or amounts
applicable to a given grant.

t>..  Composition of cost.

    1.  Total cost.   The  total  cost  of  a  grant  program  is
comprised   of   the   allowable  direct  cost  incident  to  its
performance, plus its allocable  portion  of  allowable  indirect
costs, less applicable credits.

    2.  Classification of costs.  There is no universal rule  for
classifying  certain  costs  as  either  direct or indirect under
every accounting system.  A cost may be direct  with  respect  to
seme  specific  service or function, but indirect with respect to
the grant or other ultimate cost  objective.   It  is  essential.
therefore,  that each item of cost be treated consistently either
as a direct or an indirect cost.  Specific guides for determining
direct and indirect costs  allocable  under  grant  programs  are
provided in the sections which follow.

E.  Direst costs.

    1-  General.  Direct costs ere those that can  be  identified
specifically  with  a particular tost objective.  These costs may
be charged directly to grants, contracts, or  to  other  programs
ag&inst which costs are finally lodged.  Direct costs may also b«
charged  to  cost  objectives  used for the accumulation of costs
pending distribution in due course to grants end  -other  ultimate
cost objectives.

    2.  Application.  Typical direct costs  chargeable  to  grar.*.
programs are:

        a.  Compensation of employees for  the  Time  and  effort
devoted specifically to the execution of grant programs.

        b.  Cost of materials  Acquired,  consumed,  or  expended
specifically for the purpose of the grant.

        c.  Equipment and other approved capital expenditures.

        d.  Other items of expense Incurred specifically to carry
out the grant agreement.
                           (No. A-B7)
                             'F'-ll

-------
        e.  Services furnished specifically  for the grant prograr,
by ether  agencies, provided  such  charges   are  consistent  with
criteria  outlined in Section C of these principles.

F.   Indirect costs.

     1.  General.  Indirect costs are those   (a)  incurred  for  a
common  or  joint purpose benefiting more than one cost objective,
and   (b)  not   readily  assignable   to   the   cost   objectives
specifically  benefited,  without  effort disproportionate to the
results achieved.  The term "indirect  costs,"  as  used  herein,
applies   to costs  of  this  type  originating  in  the  grantee
department, as  well as those incurred  by  other  departments  in
supplying  goods,  services,  and  facilities,  to  the  grantee
department.  To facilitate  equitable  distribution  of  indirect
expenses  to  the  cost objectives served, it may be necessary to
establish a number of pools of indirect  cost  within  a  grantee
department  or  in other agencies providing  services to a grantee
department.   Indirect  cost  pools  should  be  distributed   tc
benefiting  cost  objectives  on  bases  which  will  produce  an
equitable result in consideration of relative benefits derived.

     2-  Crantee departmental  indirect   costs.    All   grantee
departmental  indirect  costs,  including  the  various levels of
supervision,  are  eligible  for  allocation to  grant  programs
provided  they meet the conditions set  forth  in this Circular.  I
lieu of  determining  the  actual amount of grantee departmental
indirect  cost allocable to a grant program,  the following methods
may  be used:

        a-  Predetermined fixed  rates for  indirect  costs.   A
predetermined   fixed rate for computing indirect costs applicable
to a grant  may  be negotiated annually  in  situations  where  the
cost experience  and  other pertinent facts available*are deemed
sufficient  to enable the contracting parties tc reach an inferred
judgment  (1) as to the probable level  of indirect  costs  in  the
grantee   department  during  the  period  to be  covered  by the
negotiated  rate, and (2) that  the  amount   allowable  under  the
.predetermined rate would not exceed actual indirect cost.

        b.  Negotiated lump SUIT for overhead.  A negotiated fixed
amount in  lieu of  indirect  costs   may  be  appropriate  under
circumstances   where   the   benefits derived  from  a  grantee
department's indirect services cannot  be readily determined as in
the  case  of small, self-contained  or  isolated  activity.   When
this method  is  used,  a  determination should be made that the
amount negotiated will be approximately the  same  as  the  actual

                            (No. A-67)
                             E-12

-------
 indirect  cost  that nay be incurred.  Such amounts negotiated in
 lieu of indirect costs will be treated  as  an  offset  to  total
 indirect  expenses of the grantee department before allocation to
 remaining activities.  The base on which such remaining  expenses
 are allocated should be appropriately adjusted.      ;  ;

    3•  Limitation  on indirect costs.

        a.  Federal grants may be subject to laws that limit  the
 amount  of  indirect  costs  that  may be allowed.  Agencies that
 sponsor grants of this type will establish procedures which  will
 assure  that the amount actually allowed for indirect costs under
 each such grant does not exceed the maximum allowable  under  the
 statutory limitation or the amount otherwise allowable under this
 Circular, whichever is the smaller.

        b.  When  the  amount   allowable   under   a   statutory
 limitation  is  less  than  the  amount  otherwise  allocabie  as
 indirect costs under this Circular, the amount not recoverable as
 indirect costs under a  grant  may  not  be  shifted  to  another
 federally-sponsored grant program or contract.

 G.  Cost incurred by agencies other than the grantee.

    1.   General.  The cost of service provided by other  agencies
 may only include allowable direct costs of the service plus a pro
 rata  share  of  allowable  supporting  costs (Section Ł.12.) and
 supervision directly required in performing the service, but  not
 supervision of a general nature such as that provided by the head
 of a department and his staff assistants not directly involved in
 operations.   However, supervision by the head of a department or
 agency whose sole function is  providing  the  service  furnishes
 would  be  an  eligible  cost.   Supporting  costs  include those
 furnished by other units of the supplying department or by  other
 agencies.

    2.   Alternative methods of  determining  indirect   cost.    In
 lieu  of determining actual indirect cost related to a particular
 service furnished by another  agency,  either  of  the  following
 alternative  methods nay be used provided only one method is  used
 for a specific service during the fiscal year involved.

        a.  Standard indirect  rate.    An  amount  equal  to   ten
percent  of  direct labor cost in providing the service performed
by another State agency (excluding overtime,   shift,   or  holiday
premiums  and  fringe  benefits) may be allowed in lieu of actual
 allowable indirect cost for that service.
                            •

                           (No.  A-87)
                             E-13

-------
        &•   Preaetermined fixed rate.   A predetermined fixed ra
for indirect cost of the unit or activity providing  service  m
be negotiated as set forth in Section F.2.a.

H   Cost incurred by, grantee department for others.
    1.  General.
_   The principles provided in Section C will  also
determining  the  cost  of services provided by the
                                                Th
    used  in
grantee department to another agency.

J.  Cost allocation

    1.  General.  A plan for allocation of costs will be required
to support the distribution of any joint  costs  related  to  the
grant  program.  All costs included in the plan will be supported
by  formal  accounting  records  which  will   substantiate   the
propriety of eventual charges.

    2.  Requirements.   The  allocation  plan  of   the   grantee
department should cover all joint costs of the department as well
as  costs  to  be  allocated  under  plans  of  other agencies or
organizational units which are to be included  in  the  costs  of
federally-sponsored  programs.   The cost allocation plans of all
the agencies rendering services to the grantee department, to the
extent feasible, should be presented in a single  document
allocation  plan  should  contain, but not necessarily be
to. the following:

        a.  The nature and extent of services provided and  their
relevance to the federally-sponsored programs.

        b.  The items of expense to be included.

        c.  The methods to be used in distributing cost.

    3 .  Instructions for preparation of  csst  allocation  plans .
The  Department of Health and Human Services in consultation with
the ether Federal agencies concerned,  will  be  responsible  for
developing  and  issuing  the instructions for use by grantees in
preparation  of  cost  allocation  plans.   This   responsibility
applies to both central support services at the State, local, and
irciian  .tribal  level  and  indirect cost proposals of individual
grantee departments.
                            (No. A-B7)
                            E-14

-------
        Negotiation and approval of indirect cost
proposals  for
        a.  The Department  of  Health  and  Hunan  Services,   in
collaboration  vith the other Federal agencies concerned,  vill be
responsible  for  negotiation,  approval,   and  audit   of   cost
allocation  plans,  which  vill be submitted to it by the  States.
These plans vill cover  central  support  service  costs  of  the
State:

        b.  At the grantee department level in a State,  a   single
cognizant Federal agency vill have responsibility similar  to that
set  forth  in a, above, for the negotiation, approval,  and audit
of  the  indirect  cost  proposal.   A  current  list  of   agency
assignments is maintained by the Office of Management and  Budget.

        c.  Questions  concerning  the  cost   allocation    plans
approved  under a. and b. above, should be directed to the agency
responsible for such approvals.
    5.  Negotiation and approval of indirect cost
local governments.
proposals  fer
        a.  Cost allocation plans vill be retained at  the  local
government  level for audit by a designated Federal agency except
in those cases where that agency requests  that  cost  allocation
plans be submitted to it for negotiation and approval.

        b.  A  list  of  cognizant  Federal   agencies   assigned
responsibility  for  negotiation,  approval  and audit of central
support service cost allocation plans  at  the  local  government
level is maintained by the Office of Management and Budget.

        c.  At the grantee department level of local governments,
the Federal agency vith the predominant interest in the  work  of
the   grantee   department  will  be  responsible  for  necessary
negotiation, approval and audit of the indirect cost proposal.

    6.  negotiation and approval of indirect cost  proposals  for
federally  recognized  Indian  tribal  governments.   The Federal
agency with the predominant interest in the work of  the  grantee
department   will   be  responsible  for  necessary  negotiation,
approval and audit of the indirect cost proposal.

    7.  Resolution of problems.  To the extent that problems  are
encountered among the Federal agencies in connection with 4 and 5
                           (No. A-87)
                                E-15

-------
above,  the  Office of Management and Budget will land assistance
aa required.                                                       4fc\
                             (No. A-67)
                               E-16

-------
                                  APPENDIX  F
OMB Circular A-21 "Cost Principles
  for Educational Institutions"

-------

-------
  *=>*'  >'
       ^v"
     '•"'-','••'
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

  OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
         WASHINGTON. D.C.  20503

               July 28, 1982
MEMORANDUM

FROM:

SUBJECT:
   JOHN J. LORDAN

   Circular A-21, Vost principles for
   educational institutions"
Enclosed is an advance  copy of  revisions  that have been made to
Circular A-21, "Cost principles for  educational institutions."
The revisions were approved by  the Director on July 23, 1982, and
are expected to  be published  in the  Federal Register in about a
week.

As you know, the  revisions pertaining  to  personal service costs
are based on recommendations  of a university group composed of
representatives  from the Association of American Universities and
  uncil of Scientific Society Presidents.   It gives universities
  re flexibility  in selecting the method  to be used in accounting
for salary costs, but still provides strict accountability for
Federal funds.   The revised Circular also makes allowable interest
costs related to  newly  constructed or  acquired buildings, major
building renovations, and major equipment purchases.
Enclosure
                                  F-2

-------

-------
             EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

               OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET

                      WASHINGTON. D.C
July  23,  1982
       CIRCULAR NO.  A-21
          .  Revised
•Transmittal Memorandum No.  1
TO THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND ESTABLISHMENTS

SUBJECT:     Cost principles for universities
This Transmittal Memorandum revises OMB Circular No. A-21,
"Cost principles for educational institutions."

The revision changes the procedures covering allocation  of
personal service costs and recognizes interest costs in
certain circumstances.
                                    David A. Stockman
                                    Director
Attachment
                           F-3

-------
                 EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT
                   OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
                           WASHINGTON. D.C.  20503
Circular A-21 - Cost Principles for Educational  Institutions
Circular A-21 is revised as follows:
Paragraph B.1.
The following replaces section B.1:
B.  Definition of Terms
    1.  Major functions of an  institution  refers to instruction,
organized research, other sponsored  activities,  and other institu-
tional activities as defined below:
        a.  Instruction means  the  teaching  and training activities
             •
of an institution.  Except  for research  training  as  provided in c.
below, this term  includes all  teaching and  training  activities,
whether they are  offered for credits  toward a  degree or certifi-
cate or on a non-credit basis, and whether  they are  offered
through regular academic departments  or  separate  divisions, such
as a summer school division or an  extension division.  Also con-
sidered part of .this major  function are  departmental research,
and, where agreed to,  university research.
                                F-4

-------
             (!)  Sponsored .instruction  and training means specific
 instructional  or training  activity established by grant, contract,
 or  cooperative agreement.   For  purposes  of the cost principles,
 this  activity  nay be  considered a  major  function even though an
 institution's  accounting treatment may include it in the instruc-
 tion  function.

             (2)  Departmental research  means research development
 and scholarly  activities that are  not  organized research and,  con-
 sequently, are not separately budgeted and accounted for.   Depart-
 mental research,  for  purposes of this  document, is not considered!
 as a  major function,  but as a part of  the instruction function of
 the institution.

        b.  Organized research  means all  research and development
 activities o*f  an  institution that  are  separately budgeted  and  ,„,..
 accounted for.   It  includes:
            (1) Sponsored research means all  research  and  develop-
ment activities that are sponsored by Federal and  non-Federal
             •
agencies and organizations.  This term includes  activities invol-
ving the training of individuals in research  techniques  (commonly
called research training) where such activities  utilize  the  same
facilities as other research and development  activities  and  where
                «
such activities are not included -in'-^the instruction function.
                               F-5

-------
            (2) University research means all research and devel-
opment activities that are separately budgeted  by  the institution
under an internal application of institutional  funds.  University
research, for purposes of this document, may be  considered a  part
of the instruction function, or may be combined  with sponsored
research under the function of organized research,  or may be
treated as a separate major function, as agreed  to  with  the cogni<
zant agency.
        c.  d. becomes c.
        d.  e. becomes d.
Paragraph J. 6.
The following replaces  sections J.  6.  b.  through d.
J.  Compensation for  Personal  Service^
     6.  b.   O) General  Principles
                 (a) The  distribution  of  salaries  and  wages,
whether  treated  as direct  or  indirect costs,  will be  based on pay-
rolls documented in accordance  with  the  generally accepted prac-
                •
tices of colleges and  universities.   Institutions may include in a
residual category ail  activities  that are not directly charged to

                                F-6

-------
 sponsored agreements, and  that need not  be  distributed  to  wore
 than one activity  for purposes of  identifying  indirect  costs  and
 the functions  to which  they are allocable.   The  components of the
 residual category  are not  required to be separately documented.
                 (b) The apportionment of employees' salaries  and
wages which are  chargeable to more than one  sponsored agreement or
other cost objective will be accomplished by methods which will
(1} be in accordance with Sections A-2 and C above, (2) produce an
equitable distribution of charges for employees' activities,  and
(3) distinguish  the employees' direct activities from their
indirect activities.

                 (c) In the use of any methods  for apportioning
salaries, -it is  recognized that, in an academic setting,  teaching,
research, service, and administration are often inextricably
intermingled.  A precise assessment of factors that contribute to
costs is not always feasible, nor is it expected.  Reliance,
              •
therefore,  is placed on estimates in which a degree of tolerance
is appropriate.
             •

                 (d) There is no single best method for documenting
the distribution of charges for personal services.
Methods for apportioning salaries and wages, however, must meet
the criteria specified in J.€.b. (2) below.  Examples of acceptable
                               F-7

-------
methods are contained in J.6.c. below.  Other methods which meet
the criteria specfied in J.6.b.(2) below also shall be deemed
acceptable, if a mutually satisfactory alternative agreement is
reached.

            (2) Criteria for Acceptable Methods

                (a) The payroll distribution system will  (i) be
incorporated into the official records of  the institution,  (ii)
reasonably reflect the activity for which  the employee is compen-
sated by the institution, and  (iii) encompass both sponsored and
all other activities on an integrated basis, but may  include the
use of subsidiary records.   (Compensation  for incidental  work
described in J.6.a. need not be included.)

                (b) The method must recognize the principle of
after-the-fact confirmation or determination so that  costs dis-
tributed represent actual costs,  unless a  mutually satisfactory
             *
alternative agreement is reached.

Direct cost activities and indirect cost activities may be  con-
firmed by responsible persons  with suitable means of  verification
that  the work was performed.   Confirmation by the employee  is  not
a requirement for either direct or indirect cost activities
other  responsible persons make appropriate confirmations.
                               F-8

-------
                 (c)  The  payroll  distribution system will allow
'confirmation of activity allocable to each sponsored agreement and
 each  of the  categories of activity needed  to identify indirect
 costs and the functions  to which they are  allocable.  The activi-
 ties  chargeable to indirect cost categories or the major functions
 of the institution for employees whose salaries must be appor-
 tioned (see  J.€.b.1.(b)  above),  if not initially identified as
 separate categories,  may be subsequently distributed by any
 reasonable method  mutually agreed to,  including, but not limited
 to,  suitably conducted surveys,  statistical sampling procedures,
 or the application of negotiated fixed rates.
                 (d)  Practices vary among institutions and within
 institutions  as  to the  activity constituting a full workload.
 Therefore,  the payroll  distribution system may reflect categories
 of  activities expressed as  a  percentage distribution of total
 activities.
                 (e)  Direct and indirect charges may be made initi-
 ally  to sponsored agreements  on the basis of estimates made before
              •
 services are performed.   When such estimates are used, significant
 changes in the  corresponding  work activity must be identified and
 entered 'into the payroll distribution system.  Short-term  (such as
 one or two months)  fluctuation between workload categories need
                 *
 not be considered as long as  *the distribution of salaries and
                                 F-9

-------
wages is reasonable over the longer term, such as an academic
period.
                (Ł) The system will provide  for  independent  inter*
nal evaluations to ensure the system's effectiveness and compli-
ance with the above standards.

                (g) For systems which meet these  standards,  the
institution will not be required to provide  additional  support or
documentation for the effort actually performed.
J.  6.  c.  Examples of Acceptable Methods  for  Payroll
Distribution:

            1. Plan - Confirmationi Under this  method,  the  distri-
bution of salaries, and wages of professorial or professional  staff
applicable to sponsored agreements is based on  budgeted, planned,
or assigned work activity, updated to reflect any  significant
changes in work distribution.  A plan-confirmation system used  for
salaries and wages charged directly or  indirectly  to  sponsored
             •
agreements will meet the following standards:
                 (a) A system of budgeted, planned,  or  assigned
work activity will be incorporated  into  the  official records of
                •
the institution  and encompass both  sponsored and all other  activi-
                               p-in

-------
 ties  on  an  integrated  basis.   The system may include the use of
 subsidiary  records.
                 (b)  The system will  reasonably reflect only the
activity  for  which  the  employee is compensated by the institution
(compensation for  incidental  work described in J.6.a. need not be
included).  Practices vary  among institutions  and within institu-
tions  as  to the  activity constituting  a full workload.  Hence/ the
system will reflect  categories  of activities expressed as a per-
centage distribution of total activities.   (But see Section H for
treatment of  indirect costs under the  simplified method for small
institutions.)

                 (c)  The system  will  reflect activity applicable to
each sponsored agreement  and  to each category  needed to identify
indirect costs and the  functions to  which  they are allocable.  The"
system may treat indirect cost  activities  initially within a
residual category and subsequently determine them by alternate
               •
methods as discussed in J.6.b.(2)(c).
                 (d) The system will provide  for  modification  of  an
individual's salary or salary distribution commensurate with  any
significant change in the employee's work activity.   Short-term
(such as one or two months) fluctuation between  workload  cate-
                 •
gories need not be considered as long as the  distribution of
salaries and wages is reasonable over the longer tern such  as an
                                F-ll

-------
academic period.  Whenever it is apparent that a significant
change in work activity which is directly or indirectly charged  to
sponsored agreements will occur or has occurred, the change will
be documented over the signature of a responsible official and
entered into the system.

                 (e) At least annually a statement will be signed
by the employee, principal investigator, or responsible
official(s) using suitable means of verification that the work was
performed, stating that salaries and wages charged  to sponsored
agreements as direct charges, and to residual,  indirect cost  or
other categories are reasonable in relation to work performed.

                 (f} The system will provide for  independent
internal evaluation to ensure the system's integrity and  compli-
ance with the above standards.

                 (g) In  the- use of this  method,  an  institution
shall not be required to provide additional support or documenta-
tion for  the effort actually performed.

            2.   After-the-fact Activity Records;   Under this
system  the distribution of salaries and wages  by the  institution
will be supported by activity reports as prescribed below.
                                F-12

-------
                 (a) Activity  reports will  reflect  the  distribution
of  activity  expended  by  employees  covered  by  the system (compensa-
tion  for  incidential  work as  described  in  J.6.a. need  not  be
included).                                               '
                 (b) These reports will  reflect  an  after-the-fact
reporting of  the percentage distribution of activity  of  employees.
Charges may be made initially on the  basis of estimates  made
before the services are performed, provided that such charges  are
promptly adjusted if significant differences are indicated  by
activity records.

                 (c) Reports will reasonably reflect the  activities
for which employees are compensated by  the institution.   To con-
firm that the distribution of activity  represents  a reasonable *
estimate of the work performed by the employee  during the period,
the reports will be signed by the employee, principal investi-
gator, or responsible official(s) using suitable means of verifi-
              *
cation that the work was performed.
                (d) The system will reflect activity  applicable  to
each sponsored agreement and to each category needed  to  identify
indirect costs and the functions to which  they are  allocable.  The
system may treat indirect cost activities  initially within a
               •
residual category and subsequently determine them by  alternate
methods as discussed in J.6.b.(2}(c).
                               F-13

-------
                (e) For professorial and professional staff,  the
reports will be prepared each academic term, but no  less  fre-
quently than every six months.  For other employees, unless alter-
nate arrangements are agreed to, the reports will  be prepared no
less frequently than monthly and will coincide with  one or more
pay periods.

                (f) Where the institution uses  time  cards or  other
forms of after-the-fact payroll documents as original documenta-
tion for payroll and payroll charges, such  documents shall qualify
as records for this purpose provided that -they meet  the require-
ments in (a) through (e) above.
            3.  Multiple Confirmation'  Records;   Under  this  system
the distribution of salaries and wages of professorial  and. profes-
sional staff will be supported  by  records which certify separately
for direct and  indirect cost activities  as  prescribed  belcw.
                 (a)  For  employees  covered  by the system,  there
will be direct cost  records  to  reflect  the  distribution of  that
             •
activity  expended which  is  to be allocable  as direct cost to each
sponsored agreement.   There  will also be  indirect cost records to
reflect the  distribution of  that activity  to indirect costs.
These  records may be kept jointly  or separately (but are to be
               •
certified separately,  see below).
                               F-14

-------
                 (b) Salary and wage charges may  be  made  initially
on the basis of  estimates made before  the  services  are performed
provided  that such charges are promptly adjusted  if significant
differences occur.
                 (c) Institutional records will  reasonably  reflect
only the activity for which employees are compensated  by  the
institution  (compensation for  incidental work as  described in
                                          •
J.6.a. need not  be included).

                 (d) The system will reflect  activity applicable  to
each sponsored agreement and to each category needed to  identify
indirect costs and the functions to which they  are  allocable.

                 (e) To confirm that the distribution of  activity
represents a reasonable estimate of the work performed by  the
employee during  the period, the record for each employee will
include:

                    (1) The signature of the employee  or of a
person having direct knowledge of the work,  confirming that the
record of activities allocable as direct costs  of each sponsored
agreement is appropriate.
                     (2) The record of  indirect  costs  will  include
the signature of responsible person(s) who  use  suitable  means  of
                               F-15

-------
verification that the work was performed and "is consistent with
the overall distribution of the employee's compensated
activities.

These signatures may all be on the same document.

                 (f) The reports will be prepared each academic
term, but no less frequently than every six months.

                 (g) Where the institution uses time cards or other
forms of after-the-fact payroll documents as original documenta-
tion for payroll and payroll charges, such documents shall qualify
as records for this purpose provided they meet the requirements in
(a) through (f)  above.

RELATED CHANGES:
    Change F.4.a.(2)(a)  (in Departmental Administration  Expenses),
sentence 2, to read:

    Salaries of professorial and professional  staff whose  respon-
sibilities to the institution require administrative work  that
benefits sponsored projects may also be  included  to the  extent
that the portion charged  to departmental administration  is deter-
mined  in accordance with  Section J.6.
                                F-16

-------
F.
H.


J.
    Indirect costs
    1 .   General
    2.   Grantee departmental indirect costs
    3.   Limitation on indirect costs
G.  Cost incurred by agencies other than the grantee
    1 .  General
    2.  Alternative methods of determining indirect cost...
    Cost incurred by grantee department for others
    1.  General ......... ....
    Cost allocation plan
    1 .   General
    2 .   Requirements ....................
    3.   Instructions for preparation of cost allocation
        plans
    4.   Negotiation and approval of indirect cost proposals
        for States
    5.   Negotiation and approval of indirect cost proposals
        for local governments
    6.   Negotiation and approval of indirect cost Disposals
        for federally-recognized Indian tribal  governments.
    7 .   Resolution of problems
                                                               9
                                                               9
                                                              10
                                                              ID
                                                              10
                                                              11


                                                              11
                                                              11

                                                              11

                                                              12

                                                              12

                                                              12
                                                              12
                           (No.  A-67)

                         E-6

-------

-------
         PRINCIPLES FOR DETERMINING COSTS APPLICABLE TO
           GRANTS AND CONTRACTS WITH STATE, LOCAL, AND
         FEDERALLY RECOGNIZED INDIAN TRIBAL GOVERNMENTS
A.  Purpose and scope.
                                                         «•*-
    1.  Objectives.  This Attachment sets  forth  principles  f
determining  the  allowable  costs  of  programs  administered
State, local, and federally-recognized Indian tribal  governmen
under grants from and contracts with the Federal Government.
principles  are for the purpose of cost determination and are r.
intended to identify the circumstances or dictate the  extent
Federal  and  State  or local participation in the financing cf
particular  grant.    They   are   designed   to   provide   th
federally-assisted  programs  bear  their  fair  share  of  ccs
recognized under these principles,  -except  where  restricted
prohibited  by  law.   No provision for profit or other ar.crer.e
above cost is intended.
                   «* s
                   'nc.
                   * * w
                   ^ <•>

                   Of

                    a

                   at
                    Ł

                   *•. •-
    2-  Policy guide;s.   The application of
based on the fundamental premises that:
these  principles
        a.  State, local, and federally-recognized Indian  triral
governments  are  responsible  l"or  the  efficient  and effective
administration  of  grant  and  contract  programs  through   the
application of sound management practices.

        b.  The grantee or contractor assumes the  responsibility
for  seeing  that  federally-assisted  program  funds  have  beer.
expended and accounted for consistent with underlying  agreements
and program objectives.

        c.  Each   grantee   or   contractor   organization,   in
recogr.ition of its own unique combination of staff facilities and
experience,  will  have  the primary responsibility for employing
whatever form of organization and management  techniques  may  be
necessary to assure proper and efficient administration.

    3.  Application.  These principles will  be  applied  by  all
Federal  agencies  in determining costs incurred by State, local.
and federally recognized Indian tribal governments under  Federal
grants and cost reimbursement type contracts (including subgrants
and   subcontracts)   except 'those  with  (a)  publicly-fi.nar.rei
educational institutions subject  to  Office  of  Management  and
Budget  Circular A-21, and (b) publicly-owned hospitals and other
                           (No. A-87)
                                E-7

-------
providers of medical care subject to requirements promulgated
the sponsoring Federal agencies.

B.  Definitions.

    1.  Approval or authorization of the grantor  Federal  agency
means   documentation   evidencing  consent  prior  to  incurring
specific cost.

    2.  Cost allocation plan means the documentation identifying,
accumulating, and distributing allowable costs under  grants  and
contracts together with the allocation methods used.

    3.  Cost, as used herein, means cost as determined on a cash.
accrual, or other basis acceptable to the Federal grantor  agency
as a discharge of the grantee's accountability for Federal ^funds^

    4.  Cost objective means a pool, center, or area  established
for  the accumulation of cost.  Such areas include organizational
units, functions,  objects  or  items  of  expense,  as  well  as
ultimate  cost  objectives  including  specific grants, projects,
contracts, and other activities.

    5-  Federal agency means any department, agency,  commission,
or  instrumentality  in  the  executive  branch  of  the  Fedej
Government which makes grants to or contracts with State,  lo<
or federally-recognized Indian tribal governments.

    6.  Federallv^feeognized Indian tribal governments means  the
governing  body  or  a  governmental  agency of any Indian tribe.
band, nation, or other organized group  or  community  (including
any  native  village as defined in Section 3 of the Alaska Native
Claims Settlement Act, 85 Stat. 688) certified by  the  Secrerary
of the Interior as eligible for the special programs and services
provided by him through the Bureau of Indian Affairs.

    7.  Grant means an agreement between the  Federal  Government
and   a  State,  local,  or  federally-recognized   Indian  tribal
government whereby the Federal Government provides funds  or  aid
in kind to carry out  specified programs, services, or activities.
The principles  and policies stated in this Circular as applicable
to  grants   in  general also apply to any federally-sponsored  cost
reimbursement-type of agreement performed by a State.  local,  or
federally-recognized  Indian tribal government.

    6.  Grant program means those activ: ».ies  and  operations of
the   grantee  which  are necessary to carry our the purposes of the

                            (No. A-87)
                           E-8

-------
 grant, including any portion  of  the  program  financed  by  the
 grantee.

     f.  Grantee means the department or agency of  State,   local.
 or   federally  recognized  Indian  tribal   government  which  is
 responsible for administration of the grant.

     *°- tocal unit means any political .subdivision of  government
 below the State level.

     11. Other  State  or  local  agencies  means  department*  or
 agencies   of  the  State  or  local   ur.at  which  provide   goods,
 facilities,  and services to a grantee.

     12. Services,  as used herein,  means  goods  and facilities,   as
 veil as services.

     13. Supporting services means auxiliary functions  necessary
 to  sustain   the  direct «ffort involved in administering  a  grar.t
 prograr. or an activity providing service to the  grant  "pregrar..
 These services may be centralized in the grantee department  or  in
 aome  other   agency,  and include procurement, payroll,  personnel
 functions, maintenance and operation of  space,   data   processing.
 accounting,   budgeting,  auditing,  mail and  messenger  service, and
 the  like.

 c-   Basic  guidelines.

     1.  Factors  affecting allowability of costs.  To be  allowable
 under, a grar.t  program, costs  must   meet  the  following  general
 criteria:

        a.  Be necessary  and reasonable  for proper and  efficient
 administration   of  the grant programs, be allocable thereto under
 these principles, and. «xeept as  specifically  provided  herein,
 net  be  a  general  expense  required  to  carry out the overall
 responsibilities of State, local, or federally-recognized  Indian
 tribal  governments.

        b.  Be authorized or not prohibited under State or  local
 laws or regulations.

        c.  Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in
these principles. Federal laws, or ether governing limitations as
to types or amounts of cost items.
                              .  A-87)

-------
        d.  Be  consistent  with   policies,   regulations,   and
procedures  that  apply  uniformly to both  federally assisted a
other activities of the unit of government  of which  the  grant
ia  a part.

        o.  Be accorded conaistent treatment through  application
of  generally  accepted  accounting principles appropriate to the
circumstance*.

        f.  Not be allocable to or included as  a  cost  of  any
other federally financed program in either  the current or a prior
period.

        g.  Be net of all applicable credits.

    2.  Alloeable costs.

        a.  A cost is allocable to a particular cost objective to
the extent of benefits received by such objective.

        b.  Any cost allocable to  a  particular  grant  or  cost
objective  under the principles provided for in this Circular may
not be shifted,to other Federal grant programs to  overcome  fund
deficiencies.   avoid   restrictions  imposed  by  lav  or  grar.t
agreements, or for other reasons.

        c.  Where ar. allocation of  joint   cost  will  ultimateldfc
result  in charges to a grant program, an allocation plan will  beV
required as prescribed in Section J.                    •

    3.  Applicable credits.

        a.  Applicable  credits  refer  to  those   receipts    or
reduction of expenditure-type transactions vhich offset  or reduce
expense  items  allocable  to grants as direct or indirect costs.
Examples of auch transactions are:   purchase  discounts;   rebates
or  allowances,   recoveries  or  indemnities  en  losses;  sale  of
publications, equipment,  and  scrap;   income  from  personal   or
incidental services.- and adjustments of overpayments or  erroneous
charges.

        b.  Applicable credits may also arise when Federal  funds
are  received  or are available from sources other than  the grant
program involved to finance operations or capital   items  of  the
grantee.    This   includes   costs   arising  from  the use  or
t'ipreciation  of  items  donsted  or  financed by  the   Federal
Government  to  fulfill matching requirements under another grant

                           (No. A-67)
                             E-10

-------
program.  These types of  credits  should  likewise  be  used  to
reduce  related  sxpenditures in determining the rates or awounts
applicable to s given grant.

Ł.  Competition of cost.

    1.  Total cost.   The  total  cost  of  •  grant  prograr  is
comprised   of   the   Allowable  direct  cost  incident  to  its
performance, plus its allocable  portion  of  allowable  indirect
costs, less applicable credits.

    2.  Clsssification of costs.  There is no universal rule  for
classifying  certain  costs  as  either  direct or indirect under
•very accounting system.  A cost fcay be direct  with  respect  to
some  specific  service or function, but indirect with respect to
the grant or other ultimate cost  objective.   It  is  essential,
therefore,  that each item of cost be treated consistently either
as a direct or an indirect cost.  Specific guides for determining
direct and indirect costs  allocsble  under  grant  programs  are
provided in the sectioni which follow.

E.  Direct costs.

    1.  general .  Direct costs are those that can  be  identified
specifically  with  a particular tost objective.  These costs »sy
be charged directly to grants, contracts, or  to  ether  programs
against which costs are finally lodged.  Direct costs may also be
charged  to  cost  objectives  used for the accumulation of costs
per.si.ng distribution in due course to grants *nd  -other  ultimat*
cost objectives.
    2.  Application.
programs are:
                      Typical direct "costs  chargeable  to  grar.-.
        a.  Compensation of employees for  the  Time  and
devoted specifically to the execution of -grant programs.
                                                           effort
        b.  Cost of materials  Acquired,  consumed,  or  expended
specifically for the purpose of the grant.

        c.  Equipment and other approved -capital expenditures .

        d.  Other items of expense incurred specifically to carry
out the grant agreement.
                           (No. A-67)
                             F-ll

-------
         e.   Services  furnished specifically for the  grant  prograr^
 by other agencies, provided  such  charges   are  consistent  w;t3
 criteria outlined  in  Section C of these  principles.

 F.  Indirect costs.

     1-   General.   Indirect  costs  are  those   (a)  incurred   for   a
 common   or  joint purpose  benefiting more than one cost  objective,
 and  (b) not  readily assignable   to   the   cost   objectives
 specifically  benefited,  without  effort disproportionate to the
 results achieved.  The term "indirect costs,"  as  used   herein,
 applies  to  costs of .this  type originating  in   the   grantee
 department,  as well as those incurred by  other  departments   in
 supplying   goods.  services,   and facilities,   to   the   grantee
 department.   To facilitate   equitable distribution   of indirect
 expenses to  the  cost objectives served,  it may be necessary  to
 establish a number of pools of indirect   cost  within  a   grantee
 department   or in other  agencies providing services to a  grantee
 department.    Indirect cost  pools  should  be  distributed    tc
 benefiting   cost   objectives  on   bases   which  wall produce   an
 equitable result in consideration of  relative benefits  derived.

     2-   Grantee  departmental   indirect   costs.     All   grantee
 departmental  indirect costs,  including  the  various levels  of
.supervision,   are  eligible  for   allocation  to  grant programs.
 provided they meet the conditions set forth in this  Circular.
 lieu of determining  the   actual amount of grantee departmental
 indirect cost allocable to  a grar.t program,  the following  methods
 may be  used:

         a.   Predetermined fixed  rates  for  indirect  costs.    A
 predetermined  fixed  rate for  computing  indirect costs  applicable
 to a grant  may be  negotiated annually in  situations  where  the
 cost experience   and  other pertinent facts available*are deer.ed
 sufficient  to enable  the  contracting  parties tc reach an informed
 judgment (1)  as to the probable level of indirect costs   in  the
 grantee  department   during  the   period to  be  covered  by the
 negotiated  rate, and  (2)  that   the amount   allowable  under  the
 predetermined rate would  not exceed actual  indirect  cost.
                                               A negotiated fixed
                                               appropriate  under
                                                 from  a  grantee
        b.  Negotiated lump sum for overhead.
amount in  lieu  of  indirect  costs  may  be
circumstances   where   the   benefits  derived
department's indirect services cannot be readily determined as in
the case of small,  self-contained  or  isolated  activity.    When
this  method  is  used,   a  determination should be made that the
amount negotiated will be approximately the same  as  the  actual

                           (No. A-6*7)
                             E-12

-------
indirect  cost  that nay be incurred.  Such amounts negotiated in
lieu of indirect costs will be treated  as  an  offset  to  total
indirect  expenses of the grantee department before allocation to
remaining activities.  The base on which such remaining  expenses
•re allocated should be appropriately adjusted.      r  \

    3.  Limitation  on indirect costs.

        a.  Federal grants may be subject to laws that limit  the
•mount  of  indirect  costs  that  may be allowed.  Agencies that
sponsor grants of this type will establish procedures which  will
assure  that the amount actually allowed for indirect costs under
each such grant does not exceed the maximum allowable  under  the
statutory limitation or the amount otherwise allowable under this
Circular, whichever is the smaller.

        b.  When  the  Amount   Allowable   under   a   statutory
limitation  is  less  than  the  amount  otherwise  allocable  as
indirect costs under this Circular, the amount not recoverable as
indirect costs under a  grant  may  not  be  shifted  to  another
federally-sponsored grant program or contract.

G.  Cost incurred by agencies other than the grantee.

    *•  General.  The cost of service provided by other  agencies
may only include allowable direct costs of the service plus a pro
rata  share  of  allowable  supporting  costs (Section Ł.12.) and
supervision directly required in performing the service, but  noi
supervision of a general nature such as that provided by the head
of a department and his staff assistants not directly involved in
operations.    However, supervision by the head of a department or
agency whose sole function is  providing  the  service  furnishes
would  be  an  eligible  cost.    Supporting  costs  include those
furnished by other units of the supplying department or by  other
agencies.

    2.  Alternative methods of  determining  indirect  cost.    In
lieu  of determining actual indirect cost related to a particular
service furnished by another  agency,  either  of  the  following
alternative  methods may be used provided only one method is  used
for a specific service during the fiscal year involved.

        a.  Standard indirect  rate.   An  amount  equal  to   ter-
pereent  of  direct labor cost in providing the service performed
by another State agency (excluding overtime,   shift,   or  holiday
premiums  and  fringe  benefits)  may be allowed in lieu of actual
allowable indirect cost for that service.
                            •

                           (No.  A-87)
                             E-13

-------
        fc.  Preaetermined fixed rrte.   A predetermined fixed ra
lor indirect cost of the unit or Activity providing  service  m
be negotiated as set forth in Section F.2.a.

H   Cost incurred by grantee department for others.
*,
    1.  General.   The principles provided in Section C will  also
    used  in  determining  the  cost  of services provided by the
grantee department to another agency.

J.  Cost allocation

    1.  General.   A plan for allocation of costs will be required
to support the distribution of any joint  costs  related  to  the
grant  program.  All costs included in the plan will be supported
by  formal  accounting  records  which  will   substantiate   the
propriety of eventual charges.                                 -ta

    2.  Requirements.   The  allocation  plan  of   the   grantee
department should cover all joint costs of the department as well
as  costs  to  be  allocated  under  plans  of  other agencies or
organizational units which are to be included  in  the  costs  of
federally-sponsored  programs.   The cost allocation plans of all
the agencies rendering services to the grantee department, to the
extent feasible,  should be presented in a single  document.   The
allocation  plan  should  contain, but not necessarily be
to, the following:

        a.  The nature and extent of services provided and  their
relevance to the federally-sponsored programs.

        b.  The items of expense to be included.

        c.  The methods to be used in distributing cost.

    3 •  Instructions for preparation o_f  csst  allocation  plans.
The  Department of Health and Human Services in consultation with
the other federal agencies concerned,   will  be  responsible  for
developing  and  issuing  the instructions for use by grantees in
preparation  of  cost  allocation  plans.    This   responsibility
Applies to both central support services at the State,  local,  and
JrMian .tribal  level  and  indirect cost proposals of individual
grantee departments.
                           (No.  A-B7)
                           E-14

-------
     4.   Negotiation and approval  of indirect  cost  proposals   for
 States.
         a.   The Department  of  Health  and  Human  Services,   in
 collaboration  with the other Federal  agencies  concerned, will  be
 responsible  for  negotiation,   approval,   and   audit    of   cost
 allocation  plans,  which  will  be  submitted  to it by  the States.
 These plans vill cover  central   support  service  costs of  the
 State:

         b.   At the grantee department  level in  a State,  a   single
 cognizant Federal agency vill have  responsibility  similar to that.
 set  forth  in a, above,  for the negotiation, approval,  and audit
 of  the  indirect  cost  proposal.   A  current list  of   agency
 assignments is maintained by the Office  of Management  and Budget.

         c.   Questions   concerning  the  cost    allocation   plans
 approved  under a. and b.  above,  should  be directed  to the  agency
 responsible for such approvals.

     5.   Negotiation and approval  of indirect  cost  proposals  for
 1oc a1 governments.
         a.   Cost  allocation plans vill be  retained  at  the   local
 government   level for  audit by  a designated  Federal agency except
 in those cases  where that  agency requests  that  cost  allocation.
kplans  be submitted to  it for negotiation and approval.

         b.   A   last of  cognizant   Federal    agencies   assigned
 responsibility  for negotiation,   approval   and audit of central
 support  service cost allocation plans  at  the local  government
 level  is maintained by the Office of Management and Budget.

         c.   At  the grantee department level  of local governments.
 the Federal  agency with the predominant interest in the  work  of
 the   grantee   department vill  be responsible   for  necessary
 negotiation, approval  and  audit of  the indirect cost proposal.

     6.   Negotiation and approve1 of indirect cost   proposals  for
 federally recognized  Indian   tribal  governments.   The Federal
 agency with  the predominant interest in the  work of the  grantee
 department   vill  be responsible for   necessary negotiation,
 approval and audit of  the  indirect  cost proposal.

     7.   Resolution of  problems.  To the extent that problems  are
 encountered  among the  Federal agencies in  connection vith 4 and 5


                           (No. A-87)
                                E-1S

-------
     !§   the  Office of Management and Budget will  Und
a* required.                                                       ^^ I
                              (No. A-67)
                                E-16

-------
    Change F.S.a.  (in Sponsored Projects Administration), sentence
3, to read:

    The salaries of professorial and professional staff whose
responsibilities to the institution require administrative work
that benefits sponsored projects may also be  included  to  the
extent that the portion charged to sponsored  agreements adminis-
tration is determined in accordance with Section J.6.

    Change P.7.a.  (in Student Administration  and Services)',
sentence 2, to read:

    The salaries of members of the academic staff whose responsi-
bilities to the institution require administrative work that bene-
fits sponsored projects may also be included  to the extent that
the portion charged to Student Administration is determined in
accordance with Section J.6.
             »
    Delete J.ff.c. Monitored Workload.

    Delete J.6.d. Personnel Activity Reports.

    Relabel J.6.e.  as J.6.d.

    Relabel J.6.T.  as J.6.e.
                               F-17

-------
Paragraph J.17

      Add at the end of section a.P "except as indicated in e.
  below."
      Add a new section e., as follows:

  J. 17.  e.  The cost of interest paid to an external party is
  allowable where associated with the following assets, provided
  the assets are used in support of sponsored agreements, and the
  total cost (including depreciation or use allowance, operation and
  maintenance costs, interest, etc.*) does not exceed the rental
  cost of comparable assets in the same locality.

              (1) Buildings acquired or completed on or after
  July 1, 1982.

              (2) Major reconstruction and remodeling of existing
              •
  buildings completed on or after July 1, 1982.

              J3) Acquisition or fabrication of capital equipment
  (as defined in paragraph J.13, "Equipment and other capital expen-
  ditures") completed on or after July 1, 1982, costing 510,000 or
  more, if agreed to by the Government.
                                 F-18

-------
                                            APPENDIX G
              ADVANCED STATISTICAL TOOLS .
The purpose of this section is to discuss analytical tools
that are useful when analysis of data is required.  The
discussion will indicate the range of available tools,
provide a description of what they are intended to do,
and point out some of the limitations and assumptions
implicit in their use.

The tools involve rather staightforward computations
made according to rigid formulas.  They perform their
functions regardless of whether they are the wrong tool
for the right problem or whether there are errors or
inconsistencies in the data utilized.  Using an analytical
tool requires a basic understanding of the problem.

The statistical tools in this section will be explained
but they will not be covered in depth.  It is recommended
that a formal course be taken to effectively apply the
statistical tools.
                           G-l

-------
Background
The two broad groups of analytical tools are classified
according to the type of relationship that is involved;
tools are either qualitative or quantitive.  A qualitative
relationship is one in which two or more things are ,
related but in some nonquantitative manner.  An example
is the apparent relationship between stress and heart
attacks.  On the other hand, a quantitative relationship
implies that two or more things are not  only related
qualitatively, but that the relationship can be measured
and expressed in numerical terms.  An example is the learning
or improvement curve theory, which states that as produc-
tion quntity doubles, recurring manhours per unit decrease
at a constant rate.  This quantitative relationship has
been measured and verified literally hundreds of times
in cost and price analysis.

It is necessary to distinguish between the relationships
described above and causal relationships.  A causal relation-
ship implies that one thing causes another to happen.
Many of us tend to say that because A and R are related,
A causes B or vice versa.  The fact is that causality
cannot be established by any analytical technique.
Analysis may be used as evidence to support an assertion
of causality, but it is also must be supported by strong,
logical arguments as well.

There are three basic statistical tools for establishing
a qualitative relationship between two or more variables.
They are distinguished by the types of questions they
answer about the relationship.
THE X  (CTI SQUARED) TEST

This is a relatively simple test which can answer the
question:  Is one variable independent of another (or
others)?  By independt, we mean that one thing does not
appear to influence or occur in concert with the other.
The procedure is incapable of determining the strengh
or quantitative nature of dependence,  if it exists.
Some questions to which this procedure miht apply are:

a.  Is there a relaionship between absenteeism and pro-
    ductivity?

b.  Is thee a relationship between contract type and the
    nature of the work?

c.  Is there a relationship between cost growth and con-
    tract type (or nature of the work)?

                           G-2

-------
 rn R R EL AT i n K A \' ?-. LYSIS

 This is similar to the procedure described above,  except
 that the strength (as measured by a statistic called
 the correlation coefficient) and direction (either direct
 or inverse of the relationship can be determined.
 Correlation analysis is useful when the variables  of
 interest are nonquantitative (such as contract type),  or
 when the sole interest lies in establishing that two
 things are correlated.
 ANALYSIS DF VARIANCE

 This is analytic technique to cmpare  different  sets of
 data to determine whether  they came  from the  smae  popu-
 lation or from populations with similar  characteristics.
 Questions to which this  procedure  would  apply are:
 a.   Is  there  a  significant  difference  between  the wages
     of  men  and  women  at  a particular plant?
b.   Is  there a  significant defference  between  the annual
     income of different clases of workers  in different
     industries?
    Is there a significant difference between tooling
    requirements  for machine X versus machine Y?
A quantitative relationship is expressd as a equation.
It may be a ratio, a straight line or a very complicated
mathematical function.  All that the statistical tools will
accomplish is to confirm or deny that a particular set of
data can be associated with or described by a particular
                        G-2(a)

-------

-------
 equation.   It is your responsibility to specify and justify
 your selection of an equation to be used in any analysis in-
 volving a quantitative relationship.  The  tools are flexible
 enough to  accommodate virtually  any reasonable equation
 relating two or more variables.

  The basic tool for establishing a quantitative relationship
 between two or  more  variables  is regression analysis,
 which involves finding the coefficients (constants) of a spec-
 ified equation  so that the sum of the squares of the devia-
 tions from that equation are minimized.  Regression anal-
 ysis is  a significant  analytical tool that can be categorized
 into  four  groupings:  simple linear,  simple curvilinear,
 multiple linear and multiple curvilinear regression.

  Simple linear regression involves relating two variables
 (X and Y) by a straight line equation:

                        Y=A+BX

  The regression analysis provides numeric values .of the
 constants  A and B,  measures  of the strength of the rela-
 tionship between the  two variables (such as the correlation
 coefficient), and  provides  statistics that indicate whether
 the relationship  is significant in a statistical sense.   The
 equation itself is used to make projections of the variable
 Y,  given values of the variable X.  Other statistics can be
 used to  develop interval estimates based on selected levels
 of probability for those projections.

  Simple curvilinear  regression is any regression analysis
 that employs only one independent  (X) variable.  For exam-
 ple, the  equation:
                      Y=AX
                            B
is used in learning curve application to predict labor-hour
requirements.

  Multiple linear regression is similar to simple linear re-
gression with the exception  that there is more than one
driving, or independent, variable. For example,  the equa-
tion:

                   Y=A+B1X1+B2X2

depicts a relationship where the variable  Y is determined
                      G-3

-------
by not one, but two variables, X, and X2.

  An example  of the application  of this relationship is the
classic skill  mix problem in the analysis of labor rates
where :

               Y  *  Labor rate
               Xi =  Time period
               Xa -  Number of employees

An equation of this kind would allow you to adjust your rate
projections not only for the effect of increases over time,
but for changes in the  size of the work force.

  Multiple curvilinear regression i s a combination of the
two preceding approaches and invoi ,-s two or more driving
variables, at least one of which  is raised to  a power.   An
example of this equation is:
Y =
                                     +B
This relationship is perhaps  tod  exotic for most applica-
tions, but is presented here to complete the discussion of
the different types of regression analysis.

ANALYSIS OF COVAREANCE

  This is a statistical tool which combines some of the as-
pects of analysis of variance and regression analysis.  It
can be extremely useful when you want to relate a variable,
say cost, to driving variables of which some are quanti-
tative and others are  qualitative, as in the following ex-
ample :

     Y  =  Cost /unit
     XIB  Quantity procured (quantitative variable)
     X 2=  Type of procurement (e.g., sole source,
           competitive,  etc., a nonquantitative variable)

  A number of  well -documented  computer programs  are
generally available to  perform the calculations involved in
applying any of these statistical tools. If you are consider-
ing one  of these procedures, consult an appropriate text for
a more  detailed explanation of the particular  tool you are
interested  in.  Match that explanation with the documenta-
tion for the computer program you are using to insure that
you fully understand the tool and the nature  of the result.
                      G-4

-------
                     FORECASTING

  Forecasting merits special treatment because so much of
 pricing involves forecasting.   Forecasting is  a projection
 over time.   Examples are a projectipn of a labor rate or a
 price index number.  The many approaches to forecasting
 range from the totally subjective to the totally mathemati-
 cal. There are two primary approaches  to forecasting any
 series of data  over time: time series and causal models.

  Time series  analysis,  the first approach, treats time as
 the driving variable and attempts to measure changes that
 occur in  the data  over  time by considering the following
 four factors:   secular trends;  cyclical variations; seasonal
 variations; and irregular fluctuations.

  The secular  trend is the  gradual  growth or decline of a
 series over a long  period of time.

  Cyclical variations are expansions  followed  by contrac-
 tions that merge into the next expansion. This sequence
 of changes is recurring, but not necessarily periodic.  Many
 series of labor rates,  for  example,   have strong  cyclic
 components, the period of  which coincides with the length
 df union contracts in that industry.

  Seasonal variations are those  variations in time series
 data that  result from  natural  forces  such as the  seasons
 themselves,  or from man-made  conventions  such  as the
 different  numbers  of  workdays  in a particular month.
 These factors  make month-to-month  comparisons of eco-
 nomic data misleading unless the data  is seasonally adjust-
 ed.

  Irregular fluctuations in time  series are caused by such
 factors as unusual weather,  labor strife,  war.  Government
 intervention and all forms of unpredictable events.  These
 fluctuations can be divided  into those  that are identifiable
 and the remaining  fluctuations that are the unidentifiable
 {or random) residue of the series.

  The second approach to forecasting involves the use of
 causal models, in which quantitative factors other than or in
 addition to time are used as a basis for explaining the be-
 havior of the series over time. This approach is extreme-
ly useful when causative factors can be identified and pro-
jected.  For example,  a company may use GNP projections
                        n-s

-------
from one of the existing large-scale econometric models as
a basis for long-term sales forecasts, rather than simply
extrapolate their historical sales data.  Causal models will
usually employ some type of regression analysis to corre-
late the time series with one or more causal variables.

 The need for time series  projections  occurs time and
again. The  techniques employed depend to some extent on
the time periods for which the projection is needed and the
degree of accuracy required for the forecast. In any anal-
ysis of  time series, it is important to edit from  the  data
the effect of any events  that you know will occur again and
whose magnitude you can determine from other sources.
For example, if you are working with a series  of labor
rates, you should edit  the series to remove str-  and  cost
of living increases (if you have projections of thu^e factors
available from union agreements or other sources) and you
should analyze the residual variation in the data.

 Most projections  of time series  only attempt to project
the secular trend  of edited data, ignoring seasonal,  cycli-
cal or irregular effects.  A projection of the secular trend
is  indeed necessary for any time series analysis, but you
should recognize that a  trend projection  by  itself is sub-
ject to considerable variation from reality if strong cycli-
cal, seasonal or irregular effects have been ignored.

 Methods used for trend projections range from  freehand
extrapolation to sophisticated mathematical models.  Lin-
ear or curvilinear  regression analyses are recommended
for projections beyond two years.   For short-term  pro-
jections, regression analysis  may prove inadequate be-
cause of cyclical effects.  A technique  called  exponential
smoothing  is often used for short-term  trend  projections.
This technique considers various weights on the most re-
cent data and produces  a different projection equation at
each time period. This contrasts with regression analysis,
which uses a  single equation to describe  the whole series
of data.

 Cyclical effects are the most difficult  to  analyze and for
this reason are usually ignored in all but the most sophisti-
cated analyses. A technique  called  spectral  analysis has
been found useful for measuring the length and intensity of
cycles, but it is difficult to use in making projections.

 Seasonal effects should be considered in anv data that are
                      G-6

-------
representative of a time period less than a year: quarterly,
monthly or weekly data,  for example.  In some cases, it
also may be necessary to adjust annual data.  Seasonal ef-
fects usually are  analyzed by developing a series of index
numbers that can be used to eliminate seasonal variations
in data.

  Another method  of  seasonally adjusting data is to use a
moving average when the periods averaged  correspond to
the number of seasons. For example, a four quarter mov-
ing average would adjust  quarterly data seasonally. This
can be illustrated  as follows:
      19X2
       Unadjusted
jtr.       Data

 1         36
 2         44
 3         45
 4        106

 1         38
 2         46
 3         47
 4   '     112
                                      Four Quarter
                                    Moving Average
      57.75

      58.25
      58.75
      59.25
      60.75
  Note how the moving average smooths out the severe sea-
sonal swing.  It is easier to develop a trend from the moving
average than from the unadjusted data.

  A moving average  should  first be used to smooth data.
After smoothing, the data can be used to develop  trends.
There is great dangerthat a moving average will be identi-
fied asthetrendandusedas a basis for establishing prices.
The danger can  be illustrated by the following example,  in
which a moving average  called the cumulative average is
used.
      Unit No..

          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
   Actual Hours

       100
        95
        90
        85
        80
  Cumulative
Average Hours

    100.0
     97.5
     95.0
     92.5
     90.0
                       G-7

-------
  There are four approaches to estimating the cost of Unit
6 based on this data:
      Last actual
      Trend from actuals
      Cumulative average to last actual
      Trend from cumulative average
Hour

 80
 75
 90
 87.5
  A cumulative average will tend to obscure the effect of a
trend in  data.  It is for this reason that any type of moving
average  should be carefully evaluated before it is used as
a basis for pricing.

  Irregular variations must be considered on a case by case
basis and a great deal  of  judgment applied  when they are
considered in forecasting.

                THE LEARNING CURVE

  The learning curve is a tool used primarily to project re-
source requirements.   It has been used successfully to
project the direct manufacturing labor hours needed to pro-
duce a known quantity of a product,  and is sometimes used
to project the quantity of  material  required for a produc-
tion run.   It has been used to project the dollar costs of
subcontracted items after  adjustment of the historical cost
data for inflation.

  Historically, the term "learner's curve" was adapted from
the observation that  individuals who perform  repetitive
tasks exhibit a rate of improvement due to increased man-
ual dexterity.  The mental and muscular adjustments an in-
dividual  makes from the time he first performs his task
to the time he has repeated it a number of times result in
a reduction in the  time required for  each repetition of a
uniform unit of work.   Psychologists, teachers,  personnel
directors,  manpower planners and others have used this
principle for a long time.  When the improvement factor in
a manufacturing process is subjected to  detailed obser-
vation and analysis, the causes  of improvement become
clear.

  Dexterity on the  part of individual workers  is only one
of the reasons for  reduced manhours per unit of produc-
tion.  Changes in the  worker's environment and morale,
                      G-8

-------
 changes in the flow process and in work setup, work sim-
 plification and engineering changes may all  contribute to
 improvement (or contribute to disimprovement), but they
 are nearly always induced by management  actions.  Thus,
 the learning  curve measures and projects not only the cost
 effects of improved manual dexterity  and  a  broad group
 of factors that might be called management innovations, but
 also the interaction between manual dexterity and manage-
 ment  innovations. For this reason,  the term "learning
 curve" is a misnomer.  Other terms more nearly describe
 the actual   meaning:  improvement curve,  cost or time
 reduction curve,  or experience curve.  However, the term
 "learning curve" (or 'learner's curve")  is used so widely
 that it is imperative to use it here. Remember, when you
 read it,  that all the complexities  of  causal  relationships
 are embodied in its meaning.   In essence, it represents
 the learning  of .the  firm and is  not specifically pinned to
 the learning of individuals.

  T. P.  Wright h^s contributed  much  in establishing the
 learning curve as a. cost measurement device in the aircraft
 industry. His article  pioneering the  idea  was published
 in the Journal of Aeronautical  Sciences,  February, 1936,
 under the title "Factors Affecting the Cost of Airplanes."
 Wright's findings showed that as the number of aircraft pro-
 duced in sequence increased, the cumulative average direct
 labor input per airplane decreased in  a  regular  pattern.
 The regularity of the pattern existed in a  ratio relationship
 that was exponential (e.g., it  revealed  a linear function
 only when ratios  of changes were  considered). Learning
 curve theory and  practice as it is known today received its
 initial impetus from this pioneering work.

  Both aircraft companies and the Government became inter-
 ested in the  regular and .predictable nature of production
 cost reduction because, among other  considerations,  the
 phenomenon implies that during a time of mobilization  a
 fixed application of labor  and facilities could be expected to
 produce greater and greater quantities of defense products
 in each  successive time period. Accordingly, the Govern-
 ment engaged the  Stanford Research Institute to study  the
 validity of the learning curve concept.  The method adopted
 for this study was a statistical analysis  of essentially all
World War II airframe direct labor input data to determine
 whether  there was sufficient conformity in  the  data to es-
tablish a standard.
                       G-9

-------
 The study confirmed that the direct labor cost (hours) de-        ^F J
dines by  some constant percentage over the successively
doubled quantities of units produced.  The Stanford  study
also validated the concept of a standard or model based on
the World War II findings  that could be used as a tool for
cost analysis.

 Since World War II. the  learning curve concept has been
used by Government procurement agencies to aid in pricing  .
selected Government contracts. Its application has  been
most conspicuous in airframe production where conditions
were most favorable for its use. More recently, the learn-
ing curve has been used as a cost analysis tool in such pro-
duction industries as electronics systems, machine tools.
ship building, missile systems and  depot level  mainte-
nance of equipment.

 The learning curve theory was developed from observa-
tions of cost behavior, as a function-of sequential aircraft
produced. Certain factors associated with the airframe in-
dustry seem  to be necessary to that  cost behavior.   The
first is the building of a sizable,  complex  end-item that
requires large numbers of direct labor hours.  The  many
individual tasks associated with these hours provide myriad
opportunities to learn.  A second  factor is production in
which unmechanized assembly operations predominate.  If
the operations are mechanized or machine paced as  are
many fabrication operations, the learning process is inhib-
ited.

 Learning curve applications are not limited, however, to
sizable complex end-items.   Numerous applications have
been  made  to relatively  simple and stable  items  such
as shells,  trucks and radios. -A Defense Contract  Audit
Agency publication (DCAAP 7641.14) provides information
on more that 440 learning curve applications covering a
broad spectrum of weapon systems, subsystems and  other
items.

 Another factor that influences learning is a continuous
manufacturing process with constant pressure  to  reduce
manhours. If production breaks are common or long,  the
accrued  learning  is dispersed through  reassignment of
workers or even forgetfulness.  A fourth factor is the ele-
ment of constant change inthe product.

 One other  observation   concerning major  engineering
                        G-in

-------
 changes or model changes is worthy of note. Airframe pro-
 duction is characterized  by short model/series production
 runs.  With each change in model the learning curve pheno-
 menon tends to repeat itself.  That is,  when a production
 program is completed for a particular airframe model and
 a new production is set up for a similar but new model, it
 cannot be expected that the  first unit of the new model will
 continue where the old model left off.

  It should be emphasized that while the learning curve is
 essentially a trend concept, it  is not  a time series trend.
 Rather,  the  independent  variable is the number of oppor-
 tunities to learn, while the dependent variable is cost input
 per constant unit of production. At first this independent -
 dependent variable relationship may seem obscure. At best
 it is not likeij to seem quite as straightforward as a simple
 cost per unit time series.  You are cautioned to study this
 relationship, for it is one  of the  key concepts that make
 the learning  curve a useful device  for measuring and pre-
 dicting change in production cost input.

  The Stanford  study validated a learning curve model that
 is known as the "unit curve  "  or "Boeing"  theory. The
 theory can be stated as follows:

        As the total quantity of units produced
       doubles, the cost  per unit decreases by
       some constant percentage.

  The constant percentage by which the  costs  of doubled
 quantities decrease is called the rate of learning.   Anoth-
 er useful term, the "slope" of the learning curve, is re-
lated to the rate of learning.   It can  be expressed as the
 difference between 100 and the rate of learning.

  The unit  curve theory  can  be expressed in equation or
 model form as
                             B
                       y = Ax

 where
          y represents the unit cost (usually expressed in
           hours) of the Xth unit,

           x represents the unit number,.
                        G-ll

-------
           A is a coefficient (constant) that represents the
            theoretical  cost  (also usually  expressed in
            hours) of the first unit, and

           B is a coefficient (constant) that is related to the
            slope and the rate of change of the learning
            curve. It can be calculated from the relation-
            ship
                     B = logarithm "slope"
                           logarithm 2
 In this last equation, the slope must be expressed in dec-
imal form rather than the percentage form.

 Observations (values of x and y) that are related by the
model

                        y = AxB

with numerical values for the coefficients, form a straight
line when plotted on log-log paper.  The fact, that a learning
curve is a straight line on log-log paper has the tremen-
dous  advantage that projection of manhour  figures  at  a
future stage  of production can be accomplished simply by
extending the line into the future. This can be done mechan-
ically by physically extending the line, mathematically, or,
for ultimate precision, with the aid of a computer.

 Another frequently encountered learning curve  model is
the "cumulative average" or "Northrop "theory. This is the
model that was described by T. P.  Wright in  1936.  The
theory can be stated as follows:

          As the total quantity of units doubles,
          the average cost per unit decreases by
          some constant percentage.

 The cumulative average curve theory can be expressed
equation form as
in
                       y  = Ax

where ~y"x  is the cumulative average cost of all production
up to and including the Xth unit. The other parameters are
the same  as for the unit curve theory.  Observations related
by this  model also form a straight line on log-log paper,
                   G-12

-------
 to the difference between unit and cumulative average cost,
 because each theory will project a totally different result.

   When manhour figures that conform  to the learning pro-
 cess are plotted on  log-log paper against the units of pro-
 duction  to which they apply, the  points produced lie on a
 straight line called the learning curve.  There is no anom-
 aly in calling it  a curve when it is a straight line; in math-
 ematical terminology a straight line is  a particular case of
 a curve,  having a curvature of zero.  As previously  in-
 dicated, data that conform to the theory  of  the learning
 curve (the cost of doubled  quantities decreased by some
 constant  percentage) form a straight line when plotted on
 log-log paper. With careful attention to detail, the graphical
 approach  to learning curve  analysis will yield estimates
 which approximate  those derived through mathematical or
 computer-assisted techniques.  Accordingly,  it is  of value
 to understand the mechanics of using log-log paper.

  The Stanford study revealed that different manufacturers
 experienced many different   lopes, sometimes on similar
 manufacturing  programs.   In  fact,  manufacturing  data
 collected from the World  War  II  aircraft manufacturing
 industry had slopes  ranging from  69.7% to almost 100%.
 The slopes averaged 80%, giving rise  to an industry aver-
 age curve of 80%.   Unfortunately,  this industry  average
 curve is frequently misapplied  by practitioners  who use it
 as a standard or  norm.  For use in estimating slopes with-
 out data  on the  production cost  of  the  item at the plant of
 manufacture, learning curve  slopes of similar items at the
 manufacturer's  plant are  a better  indicator than industry
 averages for the  production  of the same  item in  other
 plants.

  You need to know  the  slope of the learning curve  for a
 number of reason's. For one,"it  facilitates communication;
 it is part of the  language  of  learning  curve  theory. The
 steeper the slope (lower the percent), the more rapidly the
 resource  requirements (hours) decline  as production  in-
 creases.  Accordingly, the slope of the learning curve is
 usually an issue in a negotiation.

  The slope of the learning curve also is needed  to project
 follow-on costs using either learning tables or a computer.
As another example, in many production situations,  a given
                           G-13

-------
slope may be established- as a standard based on reliable
historical experience.   Learning curves developed  from
actual experience on current production can then be  com-
pared against the standard  slope  to determine whether the
improvement on a particular contract is or is not reason-
able.

  The primary purpose for developing the learning curve as
a pricing tool is to permit you to predict the cost of future.
production.  The prediction is based upon the assumption
(not always true) that the future will behave as did the  past.
In terms of the  learning  curve   theory,  this  assumption
means that the cost (hours) of doubled  quantities will con-
tinue to decrease by some constant percentage.

  As with any method  of projecting the  future, the theory
of the learning  curve falls short of  perfection.  Such a
simple model of the real world cannot  hope to cover  all
pricing situations.    However, the learning curve method
provides  a reasonable approach to predicting the  future if
the historical data approximate a straight-line trend. The
farther historical data points  lie from  the trend line, the
less confidence you should place in your prediction.

  The use of the learning curve is dependent on the methods
companies use to record costs.   An accounting or statis-
tical record  system must be  devised by a company so that
data are  available for learning  curve purposes.  Otherwise,
it may be impossible to construct a learning curve.  Such
costs as manhours  per unit or dollars  per unit must  be
identified with the unit product. It is perferable to use  man-
hours rather than dollars.  The  latter contain an addition-
al variable,  the  effect of inflation or deflation (wage rate
changes), which is absent in the former.

  In any event,  the record  system must have  definite cut-
off points for such costs  that  will permit identification of
the costs with the units involved.  Most companies use a lot
release system whereby costs are accumulated on a job or-
der in which  the number of units completed is specified and
costs are cut off at the completion of that number of units.
The  continuous  process  method, as  distinguished  from
the job order system,  also yields  costs identified with end-
item units, but  in this case the  costs usually are equated
with "equivalent" rather than actual units.

  Because a  job order system commonly is used, the unit
                     G-14

-------
 cost is not the actual  cost  per unit for any particular unit
 in the lot. Rather, it is an average cost for all units in the
 lot.  This means that when lots are plotted on graph paper,
 the unit value corresponding with  the  average  cost value
 must be found. In nearly all cases this unit value (x) is the
 median withinthelot that should be given the average value.
 Thus, as  the  program progresses, the  midpoint  of each
 succeeding lot is taken as  the plot point for the  quantity
 (x). For example* if a lot  is made up of units  91  through
 100 of a given contract, the unit  value  of the  plot point
 would be 95. The calculation  is  based on the  cumulated
 number  of units in  all  preceding lots plus  one-half the
 number in the lot  under consideration:

                     (90 + 10 = 95)
                           T

  Because the early units in the first lot usually decline very
 rapidly (arithmetically speaking),  some distortion may oc-
 cur in locating the representative value at the midpoint of
 the first lot. This is  especially true if the first lot contains
 ten or more  units.   The distortion  is compensated for  by
 a rule of thumb, which  states  that when the  first lot con-
tains  ten or  more units,  one-third  the lot size should be
 chosen as the unit value estimate  of the first  lot plot point.
 Conversely,  when the first lot contains less than ten units,
one-half of the lot size should be chosen  as  the unit value
 for the first lot plot point.  It is  an arbitrary rule, which
 applies to the first lot only, but it  approaches the true mid-
point  more closely than the other arbitrary rule of taking
half the  lot size  in every case.  True  lot plot  points can
be calculated  from a rather complicated  formula,  or by a
computer. However, use  of a computer  to determine the
historical trend line and project the  future cost eliminates
the need to complete lot midpoints.

 The preceding discussion of the learning curve theory has
been limited to basic considerations. You will need to ex-
plore and understand the following topics before you  can ap-
ply the learning curve  technique successfully in all situa-
tions.

 a.  Fitting the best straight line through  learning data us-
ing regression analysis.

 b. Unit versus cumulative average data as a straight line.
                          G-15

-------
  c.  The use of unit, lot, cumulative average  and cumula-
tive total data.

  d.  Adjusting the projection for major changes in the item.

  e.  Adjusting the projection for breaks in  production.

  f. The use of ratio tables  to assist in the projection of
trends.

  g.  The use of computer-assisted computations in anal-
ysis.
                      C5-16

-------
                                          APPENDIX H
            SELECTED REPORTS FROM




                     THE




           "ACCOUNTING MINI-SERIES"




      PLANNING AND COST ADVISORY BRANCH




PROCUREMENT AND CONTRACTS MANAGEMENT  DIVISION




       ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                    H-l

-------
•                                                                              x
                                                                              1
                               Subpart 15,8
                            Price Negotiation
The price negotiation clause in the Federal Regulations is the clause
which gives us our authority to review contractor books and records and
details the requirements for cost and price analysis.

Under the Federal Procurement Regulations the applicable section was
Subpart 1-3.8-Price Negotiation Policies and Techniques.  When the Federal ,.-=.,
Government switched to the Federal Acquisition Regulations the operating
clause becane Subpart 15.8-Price Negotiation.

There were a mxnber of changes between FPR and FAR.  Generally, FAR added
definitions, reworded the regulations in a clearer format and in doing
so provided a better understanding of the regulations, and grouped the
clauses according to subject matter.
Two important changes were made.  The OF-60 was replaced by SF-1411.
The SF-1411 is formatted as a cover sheet without the detail of the OF-
60.  The specific requirement for audits was deleted.  Instead of
$100,000 and $500,000 audit threshholds, for fixed price and cost type
proposals, respectively, FAR only states $500,000 is the threshhold for
field pricing support, without any specific mention of audits.
                              H-2

-------
                        Subpart 15.8-Price Negotiation


Wfe will be summarizing each clause in Subpart 15.8-Price Negotiation.

Any significant deviations from the FFR will be explained and any new or

different requirements will be explained.

Attached are three appendices-Appendix 1 is the Federal Acquisition Regulations

Subpart 15.8-Price Negotiation, Appendix 2 is a cross index of FFR 1-3.8

to FAR 15.8, and Appendix 3 is a cross index of FAR 15.8 to FPR 1-3.8.

Appendix 2 illustrates where the FAR regulations came frcm and Appendix 3

illustrates where the FPR provisions went.


15.800-Scope of subpart-Frcm FPR 1-3.8 and quoted below:
"This  subpart prescribes the cost and price negotiation policies and
procedures applicable to initial and revised pricing of (a) negotiated
prime  contracts (including subcontract pricing under them when required)
and (b) contract modifications (including modifications to contracts
awarded by formal advertising)."


15.801-Definitions-FPR 1-3.807

Ihis clause provides definitions for the various terms used in the price-

negotiation process.  Among the terms are cost analysis, price analysis,

and field pricing support, which is a new term.  In the FAR field pricing

support is defined as "... a review and evaluation of the contractor's...
proposal by...field support personnel."

Although field support personnel is never truly defined it seems to be

anyone other than the Contracting Officer.


15.802-Folicy-FPR 1-3.801 and 1-3.807

Basically it states the Contracting Officer should purchase goods and

services for a fair and reasonable price, price each contract separately,

and don't include contingencies in the contract price.
15.803-General-FFR 1-3.801 and 1-3.809

This clause provides general guidance for the Contracting Officer.

guidance consists of general steps and procedures to follow while
                              H-3
Die

-------
the procurement process is ongoing.                                      ^fc\


15.804-Cost or Pricing Data-FPR 1-3.807

Sane changes have been made to this clause on cost and pricing data.

Cost or pricing data is defined as "all facts as of the time of price
agreement that prudent buyers and sellers would reasonably expect to
affect price negotiations significantly."

FAR 15.804 describes the requirements for certified cost or pricing data.

The requirements for cost or pricing data remains the same as under FPR-

negotiated contracts over $500,000, or any contract modification over

$500,000.  The exemptions to submission of cost or price analysis remains

the same-adequate price competition, catalog or market prices of conmercial

items sold to the general public, or set by law or regulation.  FAR does add

in the regulations specific percentages to be used in determining when items

qualify as sold to the general public in substantial quantities (FAR

15.803{f)).
                                         •
Even if an item is exempt from submission of a certificate of current cost

or pricing data, the requirement still exists that a price analysis must

be performed on the item to determine the reasonableness of the price.

In addition, the SF 1411 is included the Subpart 15.8 along with the

instructions.  The SF 1411 replaces the OF-60.


15.805-Proposal Analysis-FPR 1-3.807 and 1-3.809

This clause is the basis for cost analysis performed by EPA.

15.805-1-General-No real changes fron the FPR merely a restatement of the

FPR.

15.805-2 and -3-Price Analysis and Cost Analysis-No changes.  Msrely a

restatement of the FPR.

15.805-4-Technical Analysis-This clause  is new.  FPR's only reference to

technical analysis was for the auditor to  incorporate the technical report
                                H-4

-------
 into the audit report.  FAR prescribes the minimum factors the technical
 analysis should cover.  These  items  include the need for the nunber and
 kinds of labor and labor mix,  quantities and kinds of materials, etc.

 15.805-5-Field Pricing Support-This clause replaces FTR 1-3.809-Contract
 Audit as a  Pricing Aid.  There have been significant changes to the
 audit requirement.  The term audit has been replaced by field pricing
 support. As we understand  the term, field pricing support means anyone
 but the Contracting Officer.

 Under FPR there was a requirement that all fixed price contracts and
 modifications  over $100,000 and cost type contracts and modifications
 over $500,000  shall be audited.  Under FAR, the only requirement is any
 contract or modification requiring certified cost or pricing data (over
 $500,000},  the Contracting Officer shall request a review by field pricing
 support.  FAR  does state that  this may include an audit by the cognizant
 audit office.   There is no audit threshold in the FAR.  This is a
 significant change.

 Audits  can  still be requested.  FAR addresses audits in 15.805-5 (d)-(f).
 FAR in  15.805-5(d) states that only auditors shall have general access
 to contractor's books and records. But, this does not preclude the
 Contracting Officer or his representative access to records.   This clause
 is an addition from the FPR.  Vfe still have access to contractor's books
 and  records.

 Clauses  (e) and  (f) remain the same as in FPR.

 FAR  15.805-5(g)  is a new clause.   The clause states that whenever field
pricing support was requested, the AGO upon completion of the  field
                               H-5

-------
pricing report shall send to the auditor a copy of the field pricing



report, without the audit report or the technical analysis report.  This



clause does not seem to be applciable to EPA because we do not use the



AGO system.  However this may become a requirement in the future.



FAR 15.805-5(i) is the clause that gives us the authority to review



subcontract proposals.  This clause states that the -prime contractor is



responsible for the cost analysis before awarding any subcontract.



However, the Contracting Officer may request a separate cost analysis to



ensure reasonableness of the price.





15.806-Subcontract Pricing Considerations-FPR 1-3.807



Basically this clause represents a restatement of the certified cost or



pricing data requirements in 15.804.





15.807-Prenegotiation Objectives-New Clause



This clause requires the Contracting Officer to establish a prenegotiation



position before negotiating a contract.





15.808-Price Negotiation Memorandun-1-3.811



This clause establishes the information, as a minimum, that should be



included in a summary of negotiation.  The Contracting Officer is still



required to provide to the auditor a summary of negotiation whenever an



audit report is issued.





15.809-Forward Pricing Agreements-1-3.701



This clause establishes the basic requirements for forward pricing



agreements.  The requirements include when a forward pricing agreement



should be negotiated and how the forward pricing agreement should be u



                              H-6

-------
15.810-Should Cost Analysis-New Clause
Should cost analysis as defined in this clause means a review of the
contractor's entire operation.  This includes both technical'and cost
areas.
Should cost as EPA uses it generally means the contractor's proposal is
priced reflective of current cost or pricing data, i.e., the contractor
is not buying in.  As defined in FAR should cost represents an operations
audit rather than a cost audit.
15.811-Estimating ^stsns-1-3.809
Basically this clause is the same as FPR and states that estimating
system reviews should be performed on certain contractor's in order to
reduce the effort spent in reviewing those contractor proposals.
                             H-7

-------
       COMPENSATION FOR PERSONAL  SERVICES

AN ANALYSIS OF THE RECENT COST  PRINCIPLE  CHANGES


               (March 6, 1985)
                   Prepared  by
               John  J.  Zabretsky
    Cost Policy  and  Rate  Negotiation Section
       Planning  and  Cost  Advisory Branch
                       H 8

-------
                      EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
     The Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) compensation cost
principle for contracts with commercial contractors (31.205-6)
is an almost verbatim transcription of the Defense Acquisition
Regulation (BAR) and the Federal Procurement Regulation
(FPR) compensation cost principles.  However, the DAR and
FPR versions of the principle underwent significant revision
just prior to the issuance of the FAR.

     The revised DAR and FPR evolved from the old FPR and
DAR, and numerous Board of Contract Appeals decisions.  The
revised version contained five general criteria for determining
allowability of compensation for personal services:

     1) a current year•criterion - a change to the FPR which
        evolved from the DAR;

     2) an established plan or practice criterion - a change
        to the FPR and the DAR;

     3) no presumption of allowability for non-notified
        changes - a new requirement for both the FPR and the
        DAR ;

     4) an other cost principles criterion - no change from
        the FPR or DAP and,

     5) a reasonableness criterion - contained in both the
        FPR and DAR but the revised principle has significant
        changes which (a) shifts the burden of proof to the
        contractor, (b)  changes the reasonablenss-of-total-
        compensation concept to one of reasonableness-of-
        elements-of-compensation, and (c> eliminates the use
        of Internal Revenue Code deductible amounts as a
        maximum of allowable compensation in almost all
        cases.
                             H 9

-------
               Compensation for Personal Services
                 An Analysis of Recent Changes
     The cost principles on corapensaation in the Defense
Acquisition Regulation (DAR) and the Federal Procurement
Regulation (FPR) were revised in March, 1983, and December,
1983, respectively.  The principles in both were almost the
same, with no substantive differences.  The Federal Acquisition
Regulation (FAR), which was effective April 1, 1984, contained
an almost verbatim version of the DAR and FPR principles.
Because the issuance of the FAR followed so closely to the DAR
and FPR changes to the compensation cost principle, there was
very little opportunity to work with and become familiar with
the revision.  This paper discusses the FAR compensation cost
principle and the changes made to the princiole in. the DAR and
FPR.

     FAR Part 31.205-6, "Compensation for Personal Services",
is the longest and most detailed of the forty-eight commercial
cost principles.  The definition contained in the principle is
so broad that it includes all types and forms of payments to
employees: "Compensation for personal services includes all
remuneration paid currently or accrued, in whatever form and
whether paid immediatly or deferred, for services rendered by
employees to the contractor during the period of performance."

     Because compensation can take so many forms, the cost
principle contains more guidance on determining allowability
                              H 10

-------
then any other.  Alienability under the principle is determined
by five general criteria applicable to all forms of personal
services compensation and ten additional special requirements
for particular types of compensation.

Gene r a 1 C _r. i t e r i a

     Compensation is allowable subject to the following general
criteria:
     (1)  Compensation must be for work performed by the employee
in the current year,
     (2)  The compensation in total must be reasonable for the
work performed,
     (3)  The compensation must conform to the contractor's
established compensation plan or practice followed so consistently
as to imply, in effect, an agreement to make the payment,
     (4)  No presumption of allowability exists where the
contractor introduces major revisions of existing compensation
plans or new plans and does not notify the Government, and
     (5}  A costs unallowable under another cost principle is
not allowable solely on the basis that it constitutes compensation,
Additional Requirements

     Additional requirements for certain forms of compensation
are also contained in the cost principle for:
     1.   Labor-management agreement compensation.
                              H 11

-------
     2.   Salaries and wages.



     3,   Domestic and foreign differential pay.



     4.   Bonuses and incentive compensation.



     5.   Severance pay.



     6.   Backpay.



     7.   Stock options,  stock appreciation rights, and phantom



         stock plans.



     8.   Pensions.



     9.   Deferred compensation.



    10.   Fringe benefits.





     Changes in the additional requirements are covered in



other papers in this series.   This paper will deal with the



five- general criteria for determining allowable personal



compensation costs.





Current YearCriterion





     "Compensation must be for work performed by the employee



in the current year and must  not represent a  retroactive



adjustment of prior years' salaries or wages".





     The FPR requirement prior to the December, 1983, change



was simply stated as "services rendered during the period of



contract performance".  The FAR requirement for a current year



test evolved from the CAR which limited allowability to services



performed in the current year and expressly disallowed retroactive



adjustments of prior year salaries.
                              H 12

-------
     The  only exceptions  in the FAR to the current year general



 rule are  (1) severence pay, (2) back pay for certain violations



 of  Federal  laws,  (3) pension plan prior and past service^costs,



 (4) deferred compensation accounted for in compliance with CAS



 415, and  (5) certain fringe benefit costs.





     Severence pay in the FPR was covered in its own paragraph



 (15.205-39), not  in the compensation cost principle.  This



 change evolved from the DAR.





     The  FAR requires deferred compensation to be accounted



 for in accordance with CAS 415 and pension costs to be



 accounted for in  accordance with CAS 412 and 413.  The FPR did



 not have  these requirements.





 Established Plan  or Practice Criterion





     "Compensation must be based upon and conform to the terms



 and conditions of the contractor's established compensation



 plan or practice  followed so consistently as to imply, in



 effect, an agreement to make payment."





     Prior to the December, 1983, change the FPR requirement



 was simply, "compensation (must be) paid under the contractor's



 established policy".  The DAR had similar language before it



 was changed in June, 1983.





No Presumption of Allowability Criterion





     "No presumption of allowability will exist where the
                              H 13

-------
contractor introduces major revisions of existing compensation
plans or new plans and the contractor;
          1)  has not notified the cognizant AGO either before
implementation or a reasonable period after implementation; and
          2) has not provided the Government, either before
implementation or within a reasonable period after it, an
opportunity to review the allowability of the changes."

     Prior to the December, 1983, change, the FPR had no
language requiring advance notification of changes to established
compensation plans.  The FPR language limited compensation
determinations to an after the fact, incurred cost review of
salaries and wages paid to individuals.  Since there was no
notification requirements, very few advance agreements on
compensation levels were executed.  Without advance agreements,
compensation levels were being negotiated after costs were
incurred and paid, a very difficult position to negotiate from.

Other Cost Principles Criterion
     "Costs that are unallowable under other paragraphs of this
Subpart 31.2 shall not be allowable... solely on the basis that
they constitute compensation for personal services."
     Although the wording is different, both the FPR and the
DAR compensation cost principles contained a similar
prohibition against reclassifying otherwise unallowable costs
as compensation to make the costs allowable.
                              H 14

-------
Reasonableness Criterion

     "The compensation in total must be reasonable for the work
performed? however, specific instructions on individual
compensation elements must be observed where they are prescribed.1

     The compensation cost principle is unique in that it is the
only cost principle with specific language for determining
reasonableness.  In fact, the FAR devotes an entire paragraph
to guidance on when and how reasonablenss determinations should
be made.  Both the FPR and the DAR had language on reasonableness
but the recent revisions to both changed how it is to be
determined.  The FAR provides the same guidance as the FPR and
DAR as to when reasonableness tests should be applied.  "The
tests (for reasonableness) need be applied only when a general
review reveals amounts or types of compensation that appear
unreasonable or unjustified."  All compensation need not be
subjected to the reasonableness tests, however, "compensation
costs under certan conditions give rise to the need for special
consideration".  The conditions are in instances where:
          1)  Compensation is to owners of closely held
corporations, partners, sole proprietors, members of immediate
families or persons who are contractually committed to acquire
a substantial financial interest in the contractor's enterprise.
          2)  Changes in compensation policy result in
substantial increases coincident with an increase in the ratio
                              H 15

-------
of government contracts to other business.
          3}  The contractor's business is such that it is not
subject to the normal restraints of competitive business.
          4)  Compensation costs are in excess of amounts
deductible under the Internal Revenue Code.

     Remember these are situations when compensation should be
given special consideration and the tests for reasonableness
should be applied.  It does not mean that the existence of any
of the above situations makes some part of compensation
unallowable.

     The FAR overall test remains somewhat the same as the PPR
and DAR.  "Compensation for personal services will be considered
reasonable if the total compensation conforms generally to
compensation paid by other firms of the same size in the same
industry, or in the same geographic area for similar services
or work performed".  Although this is difficult to determine,
in appeals cases, the boards of contract appeals have held
that surveys of compensation levels in the same industry or in
the.same geographic area for similar services provide the best
measure for comparison.

     Because the contracts appeals boards interpreted FPR and
DAR as placing the burden of proof on the Government to show
that compensation is unreasonable, the responsibility for
gathering survey information was also placed with the Government.
The FAR, however, has added new language which changes this:
                              H 16

-------
"in questionable cases the contractor has the responsibility
to support the reasonableness of compensation in relation to
the effort performed".  We will have to wait to see how the
boards handle the shift in the burden of proof responsibility.

     A second significant change to the reasonableness test
occurs in the total-compensation concept.  Despite the FAR
wording that/ "Compensation will be considered reasonable if
the total compensation (emphasis added) conforms generally to
compensation paid by other firms..." the principle later adds
a caveat that states, "this does not prevent the Government
from challenging the reasonableness of an individual element
of compensation...".  This language is new and gives the
Government the opportunity to challenge such items as bonuses,
management incentive awards, cash awards, etc., on an individual
basis, without regard to total compensation.  Again, we will.
have to wait to see how the boards interpret the "total
compensation" requirement of the first reasonableness test
in relation to challenging an individual element.

     Another change to the reasonableness test in the new
principle is not one that was added, but rather one that wasn't
included.  Under the FPR and DAR, compensation of individual
employees was considered reasonable if it was not in excess
of costs deductible under the Internal Revenue Code.  Use of
the Code was a general test of reasonableness.  For all individual
                              H 17

-------
compensation, cost in excess of the amount deductible was
generally unallowable.  Under the new principle, costs in
excess of those deductible under the Internal Revenue Code are
unallowable only for closely held corporations.

                            Epilogue

     Despite all of the recent changes to the reasonableness
criteria of the compensation cost principle, in a recent Comp-
troller General Report (GAO/NSIAD-85-1, October 12, 1984),
General Accounting Office was unable to reach a conclusion on
the reasonableness of compensation paid by twelve aerospace
contractors.  The report said the definition of reasonableness
embodied in the DAR (which is the same as the FAR) lacks.
quantitative criteria and there is no generally accepted pay
survey to which contractors can be compared.  The publicly
available surveys - prepared by the Bureau of Labor Statistics
and the American Management Association - and the surveys the
contractor participates in, have doubtful utility because the
scope is usually too general or too limited.  The report states
that this fundamental problem of acceptable surveys led the
Air Force to conclude that the current cost principle, for
all practical purposes is, unenforceable and should be changed.
The Air Force, in coordination with the other services, submitted
proposals to the DAR council - the DOD body responsible for
administering the DAR - to change the regulation in March, 1984.
As of the date of this paper, the DAR Council is continuing its
efforts to revise the criteria.

                              H 18

-------
   FACILITIES CAPITAL COST OF MONEY (FCCM)

  AN ANALYSIS OF THE FPR AND FAR PROVISIONS
                 Prepared by
               William D. Cooke
   Cost Policy and Rate Negotiation Section
      Planning and Cost Advisory Branch
Procurement and Contracts Management Division
                      H-19

-------
                      EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
     Prior to 1976, there was no provision for reimbursing
contractors for Facilities Capital Cost of Money (FCCM)
associated with the use of their assets.  Contractors were
expected to recover such costs out of their profit/fee.
CAS 414, issued in 1976, provided a formula for FCCM computa-
tion.  However, Temporary Regulation 40 gave agencies discretion
to either allow FCCM as a cost and change their fee policies
or disallow FCCM and retain their fee policies intact.
Pursuant to Office of Federal Procurement Policy Letter
80-7, the Federal Procurement Regulation (FPR) was amended
in 1981 to allow FCCM provided that a profit/fee offset was
made.  Where FCCM was not proposed as an element of cost, a
waiver clause was inserted into the contract.  The changes
brought about by the Federal Acquisition Regulations are:

     1.  No requirement for fee offset although EPA's FAR
Supplement does require this adjustment.

     2.  FCCM is not prohibited in cost reimbursable and cost
share contracts.

     3.  The language in the waiver clause is different.
                               H-20

-------
               Facilities Capital Cost of Money
          An Analysis of the FPR and FARProvisions
I.  CAS 414 and FPR Temporary Regulation 40

     The concept of creating a regulatory provision to allow
government contractors to recover costs of capital has existed
for years.  While pure interest expense was and continues to be
unallowable, it was recognized that all contractors experienced
a cost in connection with the use of their assets.  Since
there was no provision in the cost principles of the Defense
Acquisition Regulations (DAR), NASA Procurement Regulations
(NASAPR) or Federal Procurement Regulations (FPR) for allowance
of costs of capital, the government's policy was that such
costs were financed out of profit or fee.  The government's
profit/fee treatment varied agency by agency.  EPA's fee
policies, contained in the EPAPR's (41 CFR 15-3.808-50) were
practically verbatim to those of NASA.  The fee weights
considered, among_ other factors, the contractor's "investment
in facilities capital".  Theoretically, a contractor's
incentive for modernizing its facilities would be the
government's consideration of this investment when making fee
determination.  Contractors were not particularly pleased
with this approach.  However, everyone recognized that there
was no simple method agreeable to all parties by which to
measure cost of facilities capital.
                               H-21

-------
     The first effort towards allowing cost of capital came
not in the form of a cost principle,, but a Cost Accounting
Standard (CAS) emanating from the CAS Board.  Standard No. 414
was issued with an effective date of October 1, 1976, and
provided a complicated computation leading to a Facilities
Capital Cost of Money (FCCM) factor.  Without going into
detail, the basic components used in deriving FCCM were:
          (1)  the net book value of a contractor's fixed
assets,
          (2)  the official government interest rate, determined
semi-annually by the Treasury Department and used for certain
claims and renegotiation settlements, and
          (3)  the contractor's indirect cost allocation
pools and bases.

     Basically, the FCCM factor(s) consisted of identifying
the fixed assets by indirect cost center, multiplying their
net book values by the appropriate interest rate{s), and
dividing the result by the allocation base(s).  The resulting
rate(s) was to be used in a manner similar to the indirect
cost rate(s).  It would be applied to the applicable base in
each contract to enable the contractor to recover FCCM costs
on a contract-by-contract basis*

                               H-22

-------
     At the time CAS 414 was promulgated, the exemptions and
special provisions pertaining to CAS were much more limited
than now.  The two most significant exemptions which would
later affect EPA were not yet in existence: (1) the concept
of modified coverage and (2) the exemption of small businesses
from all CAS requirements.  It thus appeared that most
profit-making government contractors were to be reimbursed
for FCCM.  Up to this point, the General Services
Administration (GSA) had always amended the FPR to fully
incorporate each new CAS.

     This pattern was broken in the case of CAS 414.  FPR
Temporary Regulation (TR) 40 was issued effective October 1,
1976.  The base thrust of this regulation was to give agencies
the option over whether to allow FCCM computed under CAS 414
or not.  Keeping in mind that FCCM was supposedly covered in
determining profit/fee, the government's concern was that
unconditional allowability of FCCM under CAS 414 would result
in increased costs to the government and duplication of FCCM
recovery by contractors (as both an element of cost and
fee/profit).  Accordingly, TR 40 provided that: (1) agencies
could retain their fee policies intact and treat FCCM generated
by CAS 414 as unallowable costs, or (2) agencies could allow
CAS 414-generated FCCM but would have to change their profit/fee
policies to ensure that "on an overall basis,... aggregate
prices will not increase".  EPA chose the former approach.
                              H-23

-------
Consequently, PIN No. 76-64, issued effective October 1,           "^ /
1976, provided that CAS 414 was withdrawn from applicability
to EPA contracts.

II.  Amendments to the FPR

     TR 40 remained in effect for over 4 years.  During this
time, CAS regulations were issued providing more exemptions,
such as small business, modified coverage, and a raising of
the initial CAS-covered contract threshhold amount from
$100,000 to $500,000.  It thus appeared that allowance of
FCCM strictly within the CAS framework would exclude a broad
segment of government contractors from coverage.  The next
move came from the Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP)
in the form of Policy Letter 80-7.  The major  features of
this Policy Letter were the following:
     A.  TR 40 should be abolished.
     B.  All contractors, regardless of CAS status, would be
allowed FCCM, computed using the methodology contained  in
CAS 414.
     C.  Since prevailing policy held that FCCM was previously
covered in profit/fee, agencies must insure that FCCM was not
reimbursed as both an element of cost and fee.  Therefore,  if
FCCM was proposed and negotiated as a cost on  a given contract,
the profit/fee shall be correspondingly reduced (offset).
                               H-24

-------
     D.  It was presumed that an offerer who did not propose
FCCM as an element of cost intended to recover it in profit.
                                                        4?"
Therefore, the resulting contract would contain a waiver
clause in which the offerer would waive his rights to recover
FCCM as an element of cost.

     At the time of this Policy Letter, OFPP strictly speaking
had no regulatory authority; their pronouncements were solely
advisory.  Both DOD and GSA did amend their procurement
regulations.  GSA's took the form of incorporating the Policy
Letter in its entirety in Temporary Regulation 61, effective
June 15, 1981.  TR 61 abolished TR 40 and established the
policy Letter as official FPR policy regarding (1) determination
of profit and fee and (2) allowability of FCCM.

     The final FPR-era policy action occurred November 29,
1982, when TR 61 was codified into the relevant portions of
the FPR.  Amendment No. 225 to the FPR changed the following
subparts:
     1.  Subpart 1-3.808 - Price Negotiation policies and
Techniques - This subpart dealt with profit/fee policy.
The major facets included in this subpart were:
          a.  Profit/Fee Offset - l-3.808-3(b)(2) stated
that if FCCM were to be allowed as a cost, the profit/fee must
be correspondingly reduced.
                              H-25

-------
          b.  Waiver Clause - l-3.808-4(c) stated that if
FCCM was not proposed as an element of cost a waiver clause
reading as follows would be inserted into the contract:
          "The contractor is aware that facilities capital
cost of money is an allowable cost but waives the right to
claim it under this contract."
     2.  Subpart 1-3.13 - Cost of Money for Capital Employed
in Facilities in Use and Capital Assets Under Construction -
This was a new subpart which basically covered the details
associated with computing FCCM.  CAS 414 was invoked as the
means for computations.  The method of recovering FCCM
(through negotiation similar to overhead rates) was also
discussed.
     3.  Part 1-7 - Contract Clauses - The standard contract
clauses for cost reimbursement-type contracts were augmented
by the FCCM waiver clause.
     4.  Subpart 15 .205-5 - A new cost principle was added
to cover FCCM.  The key provisions:
          a.  FCCM must be measured in accordance with CAS
414 and FPR 1-3.13.
          b.  Adequate records (memorandum entries acceptable
for FCCM itself) must be maintained by contractor.
          c.  FCCM is not allowable in cost-reimbursable or
cost sharing contracts.
                               H-26

-------
          d.  FCCM must be "specifically identified or
proposed in cost proposals relating to the contract under
which  it is to be claimed.  Although this was a reference to
the waiver provision, no cross reference to Subpart 1-3.8 was
made.

     Since the profit/fee offset requirement gave agencies
the option as to which offset method could be used, EPA
amended the EPAPR (15-3.808-50(b) to provide that where PCCM
was proposed as an element of cost, the profit/fee would be
reduced by an identical dollar amount (dollar-for-dollar
offset).

III. FAR Policy

     When FAR was first enacted, the FCCM provisions followed
the DAR more so than the FPR.  The differences, most of which
exist as of the date of this paper, were as follows:
     A.  The most significant difference is that FAR does
not require a profit/fee offset or reduction when FCCM is
proposed as an element of cost.  Since there is no
prohibition against such an offset, EPA's FAR Supplement,
EPAAP 1515.970-2(a)(3) required a dollar-for-dollar offset.
     B.  At the time of enactment, FAR did not contain a
section comparable to FPR 1-3.13, the subpart containing the
details behind computing FCCM.  FAR has been recently amended
                              H-27

-------
with the addition of a new subpart, 30.5, which essentially
replaced FPR 1-13.3.
     C.  Unlike FPR, FAR does not prohibit FCCM in cost
reimbursable or cost sharing contracts.
     D.  The language of the waiver clause is different.
FAR 52.215-31 states the .following:
     "If the Contractor did not include facilities capital
cost of money as a proposed allowable cost, it shall be
deemed that the Contractor waived the right to claim it
under this contract."

     While FAR is not supposed to result in major policy
changes, the mere change in language may produce real changes,
perhaps through a body of case law.
                               H-28

-------
            Contract Closeout Action at EPA Headquarters and
            Final Audit of EPA's Cost Reimbursement Contracts



Vhen does contract closeout begin? -.The closeout process begins when the

contract final delivery date expires.  P&CMD then requests a certification

from the Project Officer that the item has been delivered.  EPA's Contract

Administrator receives the contractor's Completion Voucher, or its Cumulative

Claim.  The Contract Administrator asks the Washington Cost Advisory

Operations (WCAO) to request a final audit and furnish a closing statement,

and provide comments which will assist in the final closeout of the

physically completed cost-reimbursement (CR) type contract.


Contractor Submissions

The Contractor's Completion Voucher is discussed on page 3, paragraph 8

of the instructions for completing Public Vouchers and reads in part:

     The contractor shall submit its Completion Voucher in the number
     of copies shown in paragraph three to the servicing finance office
     and a copy to the Contracting Officer, when the following has been
     accomplished:

          (a)  Physical completion of all performance provisions of the
               contract and acceptance of the final report.

          (b)  All direct costs have been incurred and booked.  Indirect
               costs may be claimed at the provisional rate(s) if final
               rate(s) are not yet available.  The contractor shall
               identify the Completion Voucher by typing Completion
               Voucher in the upper right corner of the SF 1034 beside
               the voucher number.

The Completion voucher may be submitted to EPA's C.O. promptly on

completion of required work/ but no later than one year from the

contract completion date.  Upon approval of that invoice or completion

voucher, and after the Contractor's compliance with all terms of the

contract, the Government shall promptly pay any balance of allowable
                                   H-29

-------
cost and that part of the fee (if any) not previously paid to the

contractor, but shall be limited to 85% of the Fixed Fee.  The withheld

fee (15%) is payable upon submission of appropriate closing documents,

after final audit of the contract has been completed, and all audit

exceptions have been resolved.  Page 4, of the Guide for Preparing Standard

Form, SF1035, Continuation Sheet of the Public Voucher instructs the

Contractor on the following:

     A - Contractor's Claim for the Reimbursement of the Purchased Material
         and Subcontracted Items.

     B - Costs Reouiring Prior Authorization and Approval (Subcontracts
         under General Provisions).

     C - Withholding and Release of Contract Reserves

     D - Contractor's Completion Voucher and Cumulative Claim and
         Reconciliation - To the Contracting Officer

         1 - When physical completion of performance provisions of the
             contract is done and EPA has accepted the Final Rsport if
             required.
         2 - When all costs applicable to the contract have been incurred.
             Contractor is to type Completion Voucher in number block.
             this will notify the C.O. that the contract is ready for
             final audit.

     E - Contractor's Final Voucher and Closing Documents - The
         contractor subnits his final Voucher to the EPA Contracting
         Officer after the following has been accomplished:

         1 - Completion of the final audit of the contract

         2 - Audit exceptions or guestioned costs have been resolved.
             There is a mutual agreement between the Contractor and the
             C.O. on the final (total) allowable costs and the fixed
             fee of the contract.

         3 - Acceptable final fixed overhead (indirect cost) rates for
             all fiscal periods involved under the contract have been
             approved by the C.O. or his authorized representative.

         4 - Final Voucher shall be identified as such and should include
             the remaining reserves, and any adjustments to vouchered
                                   H-30

-------
               costs necessitated by the final settlement of the contract
               price.  The Contractor's Pelease and the Contractor's
               Assignment of Refunds, Rebates, Credits and Other Amounts
               shall be submitted with the Contractor's FINAL TOUCHES.
WCAO Steps

The Contractor's Completion \foucher and the Contractor's Cumulative

Claim and Reconciliation, when available, are enclosed with the request

memo to WCAO.  At this point, WCAO (1) examines the Official Contract

File; (2) determines the total dollars obligated by review of the Basic

Contract and all Modifications for the following:
      Total Estimated Cost
      Fixed Fee
$xxxxx
   XXX
      Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF)   $xxxxx


 (3) determines the contract period, i.e., the effective date of contract

through last date of performance in the Basic Contract or the last Modifi-

cation issued showing an extention of the contract period: (4) determines

whether the contract's Negotiated Indirect Cost Bates (FPR contracts)

or Indirect Cost (FAR contracts) clause established ceiling indirect

cost rate(s)? (5) determines whether the contract has a level of effort

clause, and  (6) checks whether the contract contains any ceiling amounts

for travel or other types of direct costs.


Once the contract has been reviewed, the WCAO prepares a letter requesting

a final audit.  Ihis letter is generally addressed to the cognizant

branch office of the Defense Contract Audit Agency, the organization
                                   H-31

-------
which performs the great majority of contract audits for EPA.  Based on
the Contract Audit Closing Statement, which includes the results of the
final audit and other information, the cost advisory office makes its
reconmendations for close-out of the particular contract.

Final Audit
Wiy is final audit of Cost reimbursement Type Contracts a requirement
prior to contract closeout?  The Contracting Officer (Contract
Aininistrator) needs an official document recommending the total
allowable cost and the total amount of fee (if any) payable to the
Contractor for satisfactory completion of all work required under the
specific contract.  The contractor must agree with the recommended amounts
of cost and fee, prior to closeout and retirement of EPA's Official
Contract File.

How was the government's right to audit the contractor's accounting
records incorporated into the CR type contracts?  EPA's "General Provisions
for Cost-Reimbursement Type Research and Development Contracts (With
Fixed Fee), contain forty three (43) approved clauses, designated EPA
Form 1900-17.  Prior to ^>ril 1, 1984, these clauses were incorporated
into EPA contracts by reference.

One of the problems with final audit is the length of time it takes from
our request for final audit to when we actually receive the final audit
report.  The DCAA auditors advised me that their first priority is to
audit initial pricing proposals, and furnish reports to the requesting
                                    H-32

-------
Contracting Officer  (CO) or his representative,  Ihe DCAA auditor's
prompt  issuance of initial pricing reports to CO helps speed up the
negotiation of a contractor's proposal and award of the contract.  With
the award of a contract, the contract work may begin as soon as possible.
My point is that the length of time it takes to receive the final audit
report  fron DCAA is not due to the duration of the actual final audit,
but rather due to the priorities of DCAA.

Another reason for the delay in the receipt of final audit reports on
completed cost-type contracts is the contractor's failure to furnish the
proposed final indirect cost rate(s) to the Contracting Officer with a
copy to the cognizant audit activity, within ninety (90) days after the
end of  the contractor's fiscal year.  Hiis contractual requiranent is
found in paragraph-(b) of the Negotiated Overhead Rates clause in EPA's
General Provisions for FPR covered cost-Reimbursement type contracts and
the Allowable Cost and Payment clause, which is incorporated by reference
in FAR covered cost-type contracts.

If a contractor does not submit its indirect cost rate proposal within
the ninety (90) day period, EPA's Cost Policy and Rate Negotiation.Section
sends the contractor a letter requesting its indirect cost proposal for
EPA cost-reimbursable contracts active during the contractor's specific
Fiscal Year.  The referenced letter reads in part as follows:
      The negotiated overhead rate clause in your cost reimbursement
      type contracts with the Environmental Protection Agency reouires
      that you provide a final indirect cost rate proposal within 90
                                   H-33

-------
      days after the end of your fiscal year.  Vfe have not received your
      proposed final rates for the fiscal year(s) ended	.

          Please submit your proposal (or notification that you have
      submitted your proposal to a Federal audit agency) as soon as
      possible addressed as follows:

          Mr. John J« Zabretsky
          Chief, Cost Policy and Pate Negotiation Section
          Planning and Cost Mvisory Branch  (PM-214-F)
          Environmental Protection Agency
          Washington, D.C. 20460
Wiy is the Reconciliation of Indirect Cost Claimed so important prior

to completion of contract closeout?  The indirect cost rates, used by

the contractor and applied to the appropriate base(s), on EPA Form 1900-

34 Cumulative Claim and Reconciliation should not exceed any maximum

ceiling rate(s) incorporated in the contract.

The Negotiated Indirect Cost Rates clause in Cost Plus Fixed Fee

(CPFF) cost reimbursement contracts reads in part as follows:

    "Final rates shall not exceed those listed below; provided however,
     that in the event rates developed by the cognizant audit activity on
     the basis of actual allowable costs are less than the maximum rate
     agreed to herein, then the rate established by such cognizant auditor
     and accepted by the Contracting Officer shall apply.  The Government
     will not be obligated to pay any additional amounts on account of
     rates above the maximum ceiling rates set forth below."


FAR has set time limits on when contracts should be closed out.  Physically

completed contracts should be closed-out within six months for fixed-price

contracts, thirty-six months for contracts involving indirect rate settlements

and twenty months for all other contracts (FAR 4.804-1).
                                    H-34

-------
For Final Audit of a Level of Effort (L.O.E,) term type CR Contract;
The Audit Feport requested by the cost advisory office must furnish a
statement on the total Direct Labor Hours expended by the Contractor.
Ihis statement is required for the Contracting Officer, as the L.O.E
contract clause establishes the Government's best estimate of the total
nunber of Direct Labor Hours required for the contract, for example,
30 - 40 - or 60,000 man-hours.  The same L.O.E. clause also provides
that an equitable downward adjustment of the fee will be made, if the
contractor does not expend 90% of the Direct Labor Hours established in
the contract.

Quick Closeout Procedures
Unit Two of the Acquisition Handbook discusses Quick Closeout Procedures
as authorized in FAR 42.708, and includes Attachment 1 entitled Final
Audits - Desk Review Procedures to be followed by the Contract
Administrator.  The procedures basically allow the quick close out of a
contract if most of the costs have been audited and we have final indirect
cost rates for all but one of the fiscal years involved.
                                   H-35

-------
               Direct Labor onFixed Rate Contracts


In recent years, EPA had increased the number of fixed rate

contracts it has awarded.  In these contracts, there are fixed

hourly rates which include direct labor, indirect expenses and

profit.  These contracts may provide EPA contractors with

opportunities to increase their profits beyond the amounts

negotiated.


Included below, are actual examples of how contractors can

increase their profits on EPA's fixed rate contracts.


The RFP requests nineteen (19) professional disciplines with

levels 1 thru 4 in each discipline.


Example A


The contractor proposed four rates.  One rate for each level, PI

thru P4.  The proposed rates are weighted average rates of the

contractor's labor categories.  The contractor's categories and

proposed rates are as follows:
Proposed
Unloaded
Rates

$36.12/Hour
EPA
Category
Level

  P-4
Contractor's
Labor
Category

Principal
Project Manager
Current
Unloaded
Hourly Rate

  $39.06
   25.41
               A 55.9% difference between the rates.
$28.88/Hour
  P-3
Principal
Project Manager
Senior Associate
  S39.06
   25.41
   20.52
         A 90% difference between the low and high rates.
                               H-36

-------
Proposed
Unloaded
Rates

$21.65/Hour
EPA
Category
Ley el

  P-2
Contractor1s
Labor
Category

Project Manager
Senior Associate
Associate
Current
Unloaded
Hourly Rate

  $2S.41
   20.52
   16.00
         A  59% difference between the low and 'high rates.
$12.52/Hour
  P-l
Associate             $16.00
Analyst                12.01
Research Assistant      9.72
         A 65% difference between the low and high rates.


How much can this contractor increase his profits?

P-4
Loaded Proposed Rate
Loaded Principal Rate
Loaded Project Manager Rate
                 $ 99.16/Hour
                 $107.28/Hour
                 $ 69.79/Hour
If the contract is awarded at the proposed loaded rate, the con-

tractor loses $8.12/hour whenever he uses the principal and reaps

an additional profit of $29.37 whenever he uses a project manager.
P-3

Loaded Proposed Rate
Loaded Principal Pate
Loaded Project Manager Rate
Loaded Senior Associate Rate
                 $ 79.39/Hour
                 $107.28/Hour
                 $ 69.79/Hour
                   56.41/Hour
If the contract is awarded at the proposed loaded rate, the con-

tractor loses $27.89/hour whenever he uses the principal.  He reaps

an additional $9.60/hour and $22.98/hour whenever he uses a project

manager and senior associate, respectively.
                               R-37

-------
P-2

Loaded Proposed Rate
Loaded Project Manager Pate
Loaded Senior Associate Rate
Loaded Associate Rate
          $59.51/Hour
          $69.79/Rour
          $56.4I/Hour
          $43.98/Kour
If the contract is awarded at the proposed loaded rate, the con-

tractor loses $10.28/hour if a project manager is used.  He reaps

an additional $3.10/hour and $15.53/hour whenever he uses a senior

associate or associate, respectively.


P-l

Loaded Proposed Rate             $34.39
Loaded Associate Rate            $43.94
Loaded Analyst Rate              $32.99
Loaded Research Assistant Rate   $26.70

If the contract is awarded at the proposed loaded rate, the

following occurs for each of his proposed categories.
Associate
Analyst
Research Assistant
He loses $9.56/hour
He reaps an additional $1.40/hour
He reaps an additional $7.69/hour
                                H-38

-------
Example B

The contractor is a small business with less than 20 employees

The contractor proposes the average rates of the individuals

expected to work in each discipline and level.
Environmental Engineer P-4
Employee A
Employee B
Employee C
Average Rate

Loaded Average Rate
Loaded A Rate
Loaded B Rate
Loaded C Rate
$33.42/Hour
 28.93/Hour
 22.95/Hour
 27.06/Hour

$67.57/Hour
 83.45/Hour
 72.24/Hour
 57.31/Hour
If the contract is awarded at the proposed rate, the contractor

loses $15.88/hour on employee A, $4.67/hour on employee B and

reaps an additional profit on employee C of S10.26/hour.
Civil Engineer P-2

Employee A
Employee B
Average Rate

Loaded Average Rate
Loaded A Rate
Loaded B Rate
$14.78/Hour
 10.17/Hour
 12.47/Hour

$31.14/Hour
 36.91/Hour
 25.91/Hour
If the contract is awarded at the proposed rate, the contractor

loses $5.77/hour on employee A and reaps an additional $5.75/hour

on employee B.
                               H-39

-------
Example C

The contractor is a large business and has a salary structure of

levels 1 thru 30.  The contractor's policy is to midpoint each

level for proposal purposes.  He also combines the average or

midpoint rate for several levels to compute a rate for one of

EPA's levels.


Examples of his levels and unloaded rate ranges are as follows:


Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level


1
16
22
25
26
28
30
Mi n imum
Rate
$' 4.55
11.66
18.63
23.55
25.52
33.23
56.85
Midpoint
Rate
$ 5.36
15.10
24.84
31.40
34.03
44.31
75.80
Maximum
Rate
$ 6.16
18.55
31.05
39.25
42.54
55.38
94.75
For one level four discipline the contractor combines levels 25,

26, and 28.  Therefore the range of rates for the level four

discipline is $23.55/hour to $55.38/hour (a 135% difference

between low and high rate).


Assume level 22 is the proposed rate.

Loaded Midpoint Rate (Proposed Rate)  S57.13/Hour
Minimum Loaded Rate                    42.85/Hour
Maximum Loaded Rate                    71.42/Hour


The contractor makes an additional profit of $14.28/hour if an

employee making the minimum rate is used and loses $14.29/hour if

an employee making the maximum rate is used.
                                H-40

-------
Now suppose the contractor combines several of his levels to get

the proposed unloaded rate.
Level 25
Level 26
Level 28
Average Rate
Loaded Rate
$31.40/Hour
 34.03/Hour
 44.30/Hour
$36.58/Hour
$84.13/Hour
The minimum loaded rate for level 25 is $54.17/hour.  The maximum

loaded rate for level 28 is $127,37/hour.


If an employee at the minimum rate for level 25 is used, the con-

tractor makes an additional profit of $29.96/hour.


If an employee at the maximum rate for level 28 is used, the con-

tractor loses $43.24/hour.


Remember!   The employees at the minimum rate for level 25 meet the

RFP educational and experience requirements.
                               H-41

-------
Example D


The contractor is a medium size firm with serveral divisions.

Average rate for specific individuals were proposed for each

discipline and level.

                   Labor Rate            Loaded Rate
Employee A
Employee B
Employee C
Employee D
Average Rate
S22.72/Hour
 25.00/Hour
 22.36/Hour
 32.69/Hour
$25.69/Hour
$ 70.44/Hour
  77.51/Hour
  69.33/Hour
 101.35/Hour
$ 79.65/Hour
If the contract is awarded at the proposed rate, the following

occurs:

Contractor reaps an additional $9.21/hour on employee A.  Con-

tractor reaps an additonal $2.14/hour on employee B.  Contractor

reaps an additional $10.32/hour on employee C.  Contractor loses

$21.70/hour on employee D.
                               H-42

-------
 Example E


 The  contractor is  a  large company.  For proposal purpose's company

 wide average  rates are used.  The rates of over 800 employees are

 used to develop the  rates.
Civil Engineer P-l

Low Rate
High Rate
Average Rate

Loaded Average Rate
Loaded Low Rate
Loaded High Rate
$ 7.50/Hour
$14.75/Hour
S11.24/Hour

$32.10/Hour
$21.41/Hour
$42.12/Hour
If the contract is awarded at the proposed rate, the contractor

loses $10.02/hour if the high rate employee is used and reaps an

additional profit of $10.69/hour if the low rate employee is

used.  There are 35 employees in this category and 19 have rates
              -5
below $11.24/hour.
Civil E ng ineer P-3

Low Rate
High Rate
Average Rate

Loaded Average Rate
Loaded Low Rate
Loaded High Rate
$14.88/Hour
$28.85/Hour
$19.74/Hour

$56.36/Hour
$42.49/Hour
$82.38/Hour
If the contract is awarded at the proposed rate, the contractor

loses $26.02/hour on the high rate employee and reaps an additional

profit of $13.87/hour on the low rate employee.  There are 79

employees in this category and 40 are below $19.74/hour.
                               H-43

-------
Civil Engineer P-4

Low Rate
High Pate
Average Rate

Loaded Average Rate
Loaded Low Rate
Loaded High Rate
$ 22.19/Hour
$ 56.73/Hour
$ 28.82/Hour

$ 82.30/Hour
$ 63.37/Hour
$162.00/Hour
If the contract is awarded at the proposed rate, the contractor

loses $79.70/hour on the high rate employee and reaps an additional

profit of $18.93/hour on the low rate employee.  There are 20

employees in this category and 12 employees are under $28.82/hour. '• .


In the above examples, I have shown that a contractor can gain or

lose on a fixed rate contract.  However, EPA contractors are not

in business to lose money.  Only in rare circumstances will a

contractor give us anyone making more than the proposed rate.


The following example illustrates how EPA can be taken in by a

contractor's explanation of his rates.
                               H-44

-------
Example F

The RFP required approximately twelve (12) rates.  The contractor
proposed four rates (PL, P2, P3, and P4).  The proposed rates were
average rates of the employees expected to work on the contract.
A comparison of the technical and cost proposal disclosed individ-
uals included in the technical proposal which were not in the cost
proposal.  The contractor was requested to submit rates for each
of the RFP categories and to include all of the individuals in the
technical proposal.  There were twenty-five individuals in the
technical proposal which were not included in the cost proposal.
The contractor's response was that the individuals in the tech-
nical proposal not included in the cosh proposal have higher
hourly rates that other proposed individuals.  Therefore, if we
forced them to propose separate rates for each discipline and
level, the hourly rates would increase.

The CO accepted the contractor's explanation and accepted the
proposed four rates.

The rat'es of the additional 25 individuals are as follows:
P4
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
Average
$ 57.56
45.94
42.86
41.61
64.68
64.68
145.53
48.51
$ 63.92
                         Proposed Average $60.05
                               H-45

-------
P3
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H :
I
J
Average
$ 50,90
32.10
40.52
120.02
39.84
129.36
56.60
36.52
44.77
45.43
$ 59.61
                         Proposed Average $33.72
p_2_

A
8
C
Average
$ 38.75
  29.90
  72.36
$ 47.00
Proposed Average $24.37
PI

A
B
C
D
Average
$  9.96
  13.59
  11.65
  15.53
$ 12.68
Proposed Average $15.63
A review of the contract financial management report disclosed

only 3 of the 25 additional individuals were used during the

first ten months of the contract  (5 or 6 these were supposed to

be key personnel).  Two were used in the Pi category and one in

the P3 category.  The hourly rates of all three were lower than

the average rates proposed.  In the PI category A was used at

$9.96/hour.  The average rate proposed was $15.63.  A was used

for 1183 hours.  This resulted  in additional profit of $6707.61

for the contractor.
                                H-46

-------
In conclusion, our cost analyses as a minimum should include the
following:
     1.  Determine the method the contractor is using for
         computing direct labor.

     2.  If rates for individuals are proposed - determine the
         actual rate and category of each individual proposed.

     3.  If weighted average rates are used - determine the
         weighting and rates of individuals or categories
         proposed.

     4.  If straight averages are used -  determine the number
         of persons in each category, the rates of each one
         and the high and low range.

     5.  Compare names in the technical proposal with the cost
         proposal.

     6.   Compare the hours proposed with  the hours available.
         (In Example E - Civil  Engineer PI, the contractor has
         35 employees in this category and 19 of them have an
         hourly rate less  than  the proposed average hourly
         rate.   If EPA is  only  asking for 6,000 hours per year,
         the 19 lower than average rate employees  could easily
         fill  these hours).
                              H-47

-------
     7.   Do not accept a no-cost questioned report from DCAA
         as meaning the rates are acceptable.   You have to have
         information in your workpapers supporting why the
         rates are acceptable or nonacceptable.

There are numerous other ways a contractor can increase his profit
on fixed rate contracts.  Some of these are:
     1.   Hire new employees at lower than proposed rates.

     2.   Hire new consultants at lower than proposed rate.

     3.   Use lower paid consultants and charge EPA as if a
         regular employee was working.

     4.   Use personnel who do not meet the education and
         experience requirements of the contract and are
         paid at a lower rate.

     5.   Charge EPA for overtime hours, but do not pay the
         employees for overtime.

     6.   Hire temporary employees who do not receive fringe
         benefits.

EPA has several contractors whose entire business consists mostly
of EPA work.  In the past, we have awarded mostly cost reimburs-
able - level of effort contracts.  Therefore,  most of our con-
tractor's contracts are cost-reimburseable.  Then we award a few
fixed rate contracts for the contractor to mix with their many
cost reimbursable contracts.  We have placed these contractors in
                               H-4R

-------

-------
  30 smas^  evn
e qons ut
s^tgoad aTei^^  SZTUJTXBUI o^ ABM
    o^ uot^isod

-------
                           LIST OF REFERENCES
Federal Aquisition Regulations  (EAR)
Environmental Protection Agency Acquisition Regulations (EPAAR)
Cost & Price Manaul  (1981) GSA  training course
Cost Analysis Techniques (1984) EPA: FCMD
Government Federal Contract Costs; Melvin Rishe
  Federal Publications, Inc., Washington DC; 1984
P&CMD Employee Presentations:
  John Zabretsky, CPRM; "Cost Accounting Standards" (June 1984).
     "Condensation For Personal Services:  An analysis of the FAR
     Changes" (Jan 1985)
  Charles Young, WCAO; "Changes from FPR to ERR, Subpart 15.8"
     (Jan 1985)
  William Cooke, CPRN; "Facilities Capital Cost of Money"
     (Jan 1985)

Armed Services Procurement Regulation Manual for contract Pricing;
    Commerce Clearing House; Chicago, IL; Out of Print.
James Peoot, WCAO; "Financial Monitoring, Contracts Between One and
    Five Million Dollars" (June 1986).
DCAA Contract Audit Manual (Jan. 1989)
    6-410.2 and 6-410.4
Federal Contracts Reports (August 1988 and April 1989)
(Revised 8/90)

-------

-------