How To Overcome
      Barriers to
      Public Involvement




1

-------
Goal
To identify best practices that avoid, neutralize or overcome
common barriers to effective public involvement.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued its Public
Involvement Policy in June 2003. The Policy provides guidance to
EPA managers and staff on how to involve (he public in the
Agency's decision making.  Its overall goal is for excellent public
involvement to become an integral part of EPA's culture, thus
supporting  more effective Agency actions.

This brochure (one in a series), suggests ways to avoid, neutralize
or help overcome common barriers to effective public involvement
activities and processes.

Assess before you act

Are you sure of your project and public involvement goats, your
internal support and capabilities? Do you know the needs of the
potential  participants?

Are you really ready to go, or do you need to:
• Ask others who have  succeeded in similar situations what
  worked?
• Help key EPA staff and managers see how effective  public
  involvement can help the Agency reach a  better decision?
• Mentor staff or seek process design  advice yourself?
• Provide more information to potential  participants before they can
  meaningfully  participate (based  on community/issue/conflict
  assessment)?
• Simplify dense technical language Into plain English?
• Translate information into other languages?
• Find technical or financial assistance  for the participants or make
  some other accommodations to include different people?
• Develop  local partnerships  to reach those whose customs.
  cultures,  education or economic circumstances  limit their
  involvement?
• Develop collaborative relationships (being mindful of  the
  limitations imposed by  the Federal Advisory Committee Act) with
  local officials, organizations, media, faith-based groups,
  businesses and more so you can identify and interest their
  members?
• Build mutual trust?

-------
Provide transparency and access

If Ihe project is complex or controversial, then any decision may
be difficult for a lay person to understand.  In such instances it's
especially important to have a transparent decision process and
provide easy access to clear information.

Staff and managers should each be able to  clearly state the
goals, roles and steps in the decision process.  Find and work
to use as many Information access forums and places suitable
lo those  you seek to involve - from door-to-door conversations
to web sites.

Transparent process and easy access allow  staff to more
effectively reach out to the potentially affected public.  This is
the  basis for building awareness and understanding of the
issues and process. It enables the public to  generate useful
information and options that can influence environmental
outcomes. Access and transparency can also build public trust
and belief in the fairness of decisions.

Avoid being an add-on

Be an advocate for public involvement to ensure it's included
from the beginning in project planning.  Be ready to
demonstrate that results are more sustainable when public
involvement is an integral part of planning for decisions.

Collect and tell stories of how listening to stakeholders
provides  Ihe Agency with a wider variety of ideas, new
information and alternative choices that improved
environmental  outcomes.

Leverage staff and money

Based on your assessment of what EPA and the public need
estimate the budget and staff you should have to hold the
number and types of events you have identified, to provide
information to Ihe public and develop access lo  pertinent project
information. If you are not familiar with the best ways to
support and conduct public involvement activities, talk  to your
colleagues. EPA has a network of experienced public
involvement specialists whose job is to work with external
groups and individuals. Look to them for advice. They can
provide creative and practical ideas that will fit.

If your budget is tight, consult with coworkers about ways  to
stretch your budget. For example, in addition to holding your
own meetings, try making presentations to community  groups at
their regularly scheduled meetings.  Find help and leverage
through other organizations' outlets such as  web sites.
newsletters and flyers.

This type of partnering can help  you reach your  intended
audience more effectively. Working with partners also can help
you  build trust. (See the brochure for Step #1, "How to Plan
and Budget for Public  Involvement.')

-------
 Find people to involve

 If your project is site-specific and involves a single neighborhood
 or town,  there are easy ways to do outreach and invite
 participation.   If your project is multi-state, region-wide or national
 consider working with national or regional organizations to reach
 their members.

 Municipal governments, civic groups,  business, youth.
 environmental and  religious organizations can help you make
 contact with the public. Consider  partnering with non-traditional
 organizations such as trade  and neighborhood block  groups to
 reach people.  Local media can also help.

 EPA's Office of Public Affairs and regional counterparts  have
 news  media and public liaison specialists who are experienced  in
 reaching  media outlets and national groups. Staff from the Office of
 Congressional & Intergovernmental Relations and corresponding
 regional organizations can help you reach national, state and local
 officials as well as their associations. (See the brochure for Step
 #2. "How to Identify People to Involve.")

 Build capacity for involvement

 Doing effective public involvement work takes real skills. If you
 need to. and there's a little time to prepare yourself, find  ask for
 and take suitable training.

 A community, organization or individual may need your help to build
 their capacity for effective involvement. They may need suitable
 resources to navigate complex technical and legal Issues.
 Consider  providing  technical  or financial assistance, holding
 workshops, using conference calls, hot lines or drop-in centers.

 By making involvement easier,  clearer and more meaningful for
 participants, EPA can benefit from unique, firsthand knowledge and
 improve the quality  of Agency decisions. Check with EPA
 colleagues to  find out how they help the potentially interested and
 affected public participate. Ask them about resources  that may be
 available and  creative ways that EPA,  its partners or  technology
 can provide:

 • access to information
 • understanding of decision  making processes
 • additional time for reviewing data
 • public knowledge of science  and its methods
 • providing feedback on public input on issues

A good public involvement process can  improve:

• respect for  accommodation of cultural differences
• trust of public officials

(See the brochure for Step #3.  "How to Provide Technical and
Financial Assistance for Public Involvement" or contact EPA's  public
involvement staff.)

-------
 Get the right information to the right people at the right time

 Base the amount of information you provide on the complexity of
 your project and on the expressed needs of the communily. These
 vary for each situation, so do your homework! Making accurate
 material available to the public in a timely manner increases the
 prospects for effective public involvement.

 •  Make information accessible as early as possible. This
   enables people to make informed and productive
   contributions. Most people need at least 30 days  notice
   about public involvement activities; more lime if the issue
   is complex or there is a lot of material to review. They may
   appreciate a reminder two weeks after the first notice.

 •  Explain the basis for EPA's actions, when and how the
   public's ideas can be considered and how the decision
   process works. This makes it easier for them to participate
   and builds credibility.

 •  Depending on your audience, you may want to use public
   settings (churches, civic groups, libraries, malls, banks,
   government  buildings, schools) as places where  you post
   your notices. Place print materials in a central location, or
   in several locations  to increase access for those without
   computers.

 •  If an urgent situation arises affecting a local area, consider
   going dqor-to-door to talk to residents and distribute printed
   information. If you do this, your staff or contractors should
   be ready to provide answers to residents questions.

 •  Telephone hotlines can be useful support for some decision
   processes. Staffed or pre-recorded hotlines can help people who
   want brief updates. This method is especially helpfulfor people
   who do not have Internet access and who may have problems
   getting out to meetings. If you use phone hotlines, you should
   provide a TTY choice for hearing-impaired callers. (See the
   brochure  for  steps, "How to Provide  Information and  Conduct
   Outreach for Public Involvement.")

 ". .  .because of lack of access to computers, many grassroots
 groups who might be stakeholders in EPA rules,  processes and
 procedures  are not participating."
 Julio Burgess
 DiBlogiiQ on Public Involvement in EPA Dadsron Making

 Use the public's ideas in making decisions

 Giving people feedback  shows that EPA takes their ideas seriously.
 By telling people what EPA did with their comments you can build a
 resilient relationship between  the  Agency and stakeholders,
encouraging their participation in decision-making processes and
building trust.

 If you do not clearly explain why you did or did not use their input,
people may  become frustrated and may not participate the next lime
they  have an opportunity. If this happens, the Agency loses out on
potentially helpful information and  ideas. (See the brochure for Step
#6, "How to  Review and Use Public Input and Provide Feedback ")

-------
 Evaluate public involvement activities

 If you don't know how well  your process worked,  how will you
 make it better? If you don't  specifically ask about the public
 involvement aspects of your project, you may waste time and
 money.

 If you choose not to evaluate, you may repeat the same mistakes.
 Future efforts can benefit from  specific  information on how well
 and why certain public involvement activities worked or did not.

 You may identify additional input that helps  you  make effective
 decisions when you make evaluation of your public involvement
 activities part of your early project plan.  You should conduct
 formal and  informal evaluations  throughout your process  to obtain
 such input.

 Evaluation helps you to define, measure and continually improve the
 public involvement process.  When you  listen to what stakeholders
 say about one set of events, you can improve  your chances for
 productive dialogue during the next set.  (See the brochure for Step
 #7, "How to Evaluate Public Involvement.")

 "No self-respecting person can do public participation unless they
 are witling to lose control."
 Bl/ss Browne
 200« InlamslnrelAssodaOori lor Public Parteipaaon (MP2) Conference

 Sharing public involvement process decisions

 To consult, collaborate and provide meaningful public involvement, it
 helps to be  flexible and ready to share the decisions about public
 Involvement processes when possible.

 EPA conducts public involvement processes directly when it makes
 many of its  environmental decisions. Often, however, EPA can
 collaborate with others in their environmental decision processes.

 In all cases, sharing the work of effective public involvement means:

 • Making no assumptions about the potentially affected publics or
  communities
 • Treating people respectfully as partners
 • Listening to their suggestions for improving anything related to
  the decision-making process
 • Using their ideas when possible
 • Making sure people know how you applied their contributions

 Your research and assessment can be the  basis for defining the
 public  involvement process that's best for your  specific project.
 Whether it's local and modest in scope or national and complex
 your process is likely to lead  to a better outcome when participants
 have a say in:

  Setting specific public involvement goals
  Identifying members of the  public who should  be involved
  Designing processes that best fit stakeholder and  EPA needs
  Suggesting who needs access to pertinent project information
  Determining which process information is  available,where it's
  housed or how it is developed, distributed  and presented
 • Planning where, how  and when specific public involvement
  activities happen and if they use neutral facilitators
 • Developing alternative choices, and more

Consulting early with representatives of various  stakeholder
groups makes it  easier to gain pro-activity support.  These leaders
can help you prepare suitable materials for each phase of  the
project.  They know how best  to publicize the overall process and
specific activities for their respective communities.

-------
 If you don't feel ready lo lead such processes, you might take
 training, ask more experienced staff for help or do some reading
 and research to resolve your concerns  and become  more
 comfortable working with communities, stakeholders  and the
 public.

 Your own skills and dedication to making collaborative processes
 work can only go so far if other people  have erected barriers.  Use
 any opportunity you find to help others become more comfortable
 about collaboration processes.  Share good examples of when
 collaboration produced  better environmental decisions.

 Before collaborating with groups that  include  non-federal
 stakeholders,  determine whether the Federal Advisory Committee
 Act (FACA) applies. If FACA may apply  to your group, consult with
 the Office of Cooperative Environmental Management for
 assistance on setting up your group. (See the brochure for
 Step #5. "How to Consult with and Involve the Public.")

 "Foremost in my mind are the issues of access and power . . .
 and this is not just about computers.  Other barriers to access
 abound: language,  location,  education,  culture, economics, etc
 Without access there can be no participation. Period."
 Enrique Veld/via
 Onlino Dialogue on PtibHc Involvftmenl tn EPA Decision Making

 Consult with those who traditionally don't
 participate

 It's important for EPA to reach and hear from those who are likely
 to be affected yet may  be unaware of the decision processes or
 whose participation  may be limited.  Make special  efforts to reach
 out to  low-income, environmental justice and non-English-speaking
 communities.

 If standard practices don't engage certain groups or individuals.
 consider listening sessions, availabilities (staff is on hand to
 respond to project questions and posted materials), information
 workshops, presentations at community group meetings, visiting
 religious and civic leaders, doing open-line radio or cable TV
 interviews or taking part in  fairs  and festivals as alternatives.

 You can promote the participation of people  who may  not be
 familiar with EPA programs by:

 • Asking the community leaders  (elected officials.
  business, church  and civic leaders) what  you can do to
   reach more local  citizens
 • Translating materials into languages  used  by the populations
   you want to participate
 • Asking for feedback about each event from a wide variety of
  people and showing them how you made  adjustments

Work with your community partners and local media to publicize
your activities,  meet and listen to your stakeholders and ensure
fairness at each step. The newest participants may
be the most enthusiastic or demanding. To keep           —^ -^—
them engaged, build relationships and build trust in
EPA's decisions, welcome their ideas and
suggestions. (See the brochure "How to  Involve
EJ Communities,")                                <

-------

Additional Resources

"Engaging Affected Communities - Barriers and Obstacles"  US
EPA Community Involvement Conference. Keynote address July
23, 2003. Larry Charles. One/ CHANE, Inc., Hartford, CT
http://epancic.org/2003/ proceedings.cfm
[Providing links to a non-EPA Web site does not constitute an
endorsement by EPA or any of its employees of the sponsors of
the site or the information or products presented on the site.]

Institutional Barriers to Integrating Public Involvement.
Transportation Research Board. Committee on Public Involvement
in  Transportation, 2003. http:Wtrb-pi.hshassoccom/
researchtopics/instbarr.pdf

Other EPA Public Involvement Brochures

 Introducing EPA's Public Involvement Policy
 How to Plan and Budget for Public Involvement
 How to Identify People to Involve
 How to Provide Technical and Financial Assistance for
 Public Involvement
 How to Do Outreach for Public Involvement
 How to Consult with and Involve the Public
 How to Review and Use Public Inpul and Provide  Feedback
 How to Evaluate Public Involvement
 How to Improve Public Meetings and Hearings
 How to Improve Working with Tribes
 How to Involve Environmental Justice Communities

"Involvement brings the pieces together" artwork is the creation
of  Erica Ann Turner, who contributed  the work through an
agreement between the Art Institute of Washington and EPA.

More Information  about the Policy

Copies of the Policy and the Framework for implementing it are
available at hJloJAvww_.epo.cLQyLpublicinvolvement/policy2003.pdf
and hUpj//_vyyywi§pai_gov/publicinvolvement/policy2003/
framework.pdf

The Website for the Internet Dialogue on Public Involvement in EPA
Decisions is hllp://www.network-democracv,Qrg/eoa/eoa-Dip

EPA' s Response to Comments on the Draft 2000 Public
Involvement Policy is  available at hltp://www.eoa.gov/
publicinvolvement/policy2003/rasponse.pdf
        United States Environmental Protection Agency
         National Center for Environmental Innovation
                  Public Involvement Staff
           1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW1807T
                  Washington, DC 20460
                               EPA 233-F-03-015

-------