Section 319
             NONPOINT SOURCE PROGRAM SOGGESS STORY
           jjtftntt or  (wwifnjnfl
                                         J
 Oil and Grease Water Quality Goals Achieved in DC Area Stream
WatPrbndv Imnrnvpd  "'e9a' °'' anc' 9rease dumping has historically plagued Hickey
                           Run, a tributary of the Anacostia River approximately 1  mile
 downstream of the Washington, DC-Maryland border. As a result of extensive outreach
 efforts targeting the major sources of oil and  grease—including local automotive repair
 shops—Hickey Run was removed from the 303(d) impaired waters list for oil and grease.
 Problem
 Land use in the Mickey Run watershed is
 largely composed of industrial and manufactur-
 ing uses, including a number of transportation-
 related facilities and automotive repair shops.
 The stream has been historically plagued by
 oil and grease from illegal dumping, and also
 during rain storms as oil and grease from sur-
 rounding parking lots, roads, and bridges flush
 into the storm sewer system, often overflow-
 ing directly into the stream. In 1996 Mickey
 Run was included on the DC 303(d) list for
 oil and grease, PCBs, and chlordane. In 1998
 organics and bacteria were added to the list of
 pollutants impairing Mickey Run.
         Mickey Run Oil and Grease 1990-1992
  140-


^f 120-


__£_ 100


I 80


C 60-
         fliJL
                       10 mg/L
                   Water Quality Standard
                     for Oil and Grease
                     •
 Project Highlights
 In 1998 the DC Department of Health (DOM),
 Environmental Health Administration, devel-
 oped a total maximum daily load (TMDL) for
 oil and grease calling for a reduction in point
 source loads by 89 percent and nonpoint
 source loads by 30 percent. The TMDL set
 the overall reduction goal at 77 percent of
 existing oil and grease loads. Because the
 automotive repair shops were an easily rec-
 ognizable source of oil and grease in Hickey
 Run, the DOH reached out to them through the
 Environmental Education Compliance of Auto
 Repair Shops (EE-CARS) Program. Businesses
 were provided educational resources, com-
 prehensive surveys, and follow-up visits. The
 industry responded by reducing the amount
    Jun-90 Aug-90 Sep-90 Nov-90 Apr-91 Jun-91 Aug-91 Oct-91 Feb-92 Mar-92

                   Sampling Date
    Hickey Run Oil and Grease WQS Attainment Data
    o
    o
              10 mg/L Water Quality
             Standard for Oil and Grease
       Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul-02 Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- Feb-
       02 02 02 02  02   02  02 02 02 02 03 03

                    Sampling Date
These graphs illustrate an 88 percent reduction in oil and grease
that has led to the removal of Hickey Run from the 303(d) list of
impaired waters.

-------
            of oil and grease entering Mickey Run by an
            even larger percentage than what the TMDL
            required.

            In addition, in January 2004 the DC DOH,
            Environmental Health Administration, DC
            Water and Sewer Authority (WASA), and USDA
            Agricultural Research Service (ARS) signed a
            Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) that
            outlined the responsibilities of each organiza-
            tion in the cleanup. The MOU calls for the
            installation of a debris/floatables and oil/grease
            removal system that would be designed and
            constructed by the ARS in collaboration with
            the DOH and WASA. As effective as outreach
            has been, the proposed system will ensure
            that oil and grease will not degrade Hickey
            Run in the future for storm events of half an
            inch or less. Industry around Hickey Run faces
            high employee turnover, making technological
            control beneficial in protecting the waterbody
            from the impacts of poor shop management
            practices,  intentional dumping incidents, and
            infrequent, but significant spills. Construction
            is expected to begin in 2006.

            The DC government, in partnership with ARS,
            is also developing a restoration plan to address
            other problems in the Hickey Run watershed.
            The stream experiences unnaturally high
            flows during storm events—due to large areas
            of paved or otherwise impervious surfaces
            —resulting in severely eroded stream banks
            and channels. The lowest mile of the stream
            currently loses 1,100 tons of sediment per year.
            The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)
            finished a comprehensive assessment of Hickey
            Run and its tributaries in December 2004 and is
now preparing a plan intended to mitigate the
damage and restore the stream by using natural
channel design. Implementing the plan will pro-
duce 850 feet of natural channel design, result-
ing in reduced sediment loss, improved stream
functioning, and increased wildlife  habitat.
Results
Water quality data obtained in 2002 suggest
that implementation efforts reduced overall oil
and grease loading to Hickey Run by 88 per-
cent compared to loading amounts reported in
1998. This result exceeds the 77 percent total
reduction goal established by the TMDL. The
District of Columbia 2002 and 2003 Discharge
Monitoring Reports indicate that Hickey Run is
achieving water quality goals for oil and grease
levels less than  10 mg/L. As a result, Hickey
Run has been removed from the 303(d) list of
impaired waters for oil and grease.
Partners and Funding
The USDA's U.S. National Arboretum, National
Park Service, District of Columbia WASA,
USDA ARS, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency Region 3, and Government of the
District of Columbia all contributed to the
success of oil and grease load reductions in
Hickey Run. With the assistance of section 319
funding, almost $2.2 million is allocated for the
design and construction of the debris/floatables
and oil/grease removal system. Of the USFWS
and section 319 funding that DOH has received,
$234,040 was spent on creating the design
plans for the restoration project and $115,370
was spent on assessing the water quality.
I
5
Q
'.    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
 \   Office of Water
 a   Washington, DC

     EPA841-F-05-004J
     July 2005
For additional information contact:
Dr. Karen Zhang
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service
301-504-5557 • zhangk@ba.ars.usda.gov
Alexi Boado
Government of The District of Columbia
202-535-1798 • Alexi.boado@dc.gov
Peter Hill
Government of The District of Columbia
202-535-2691 • peter.hill@dc.gov
Fred Suffian
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 3
215-814-5753 • suffian.fred@epa.gov

-------