jig
't.'^^^^^^^J
\
             Section 319
             NONPOINT
                                 PROGRAM SUCCESS STORY
                                 lennexe
 Best Management Practices Reduce Pathogens in Cane Creek

WatPrbndv Imnrnvpd  Cane Creek, in McMinn County, Tennessee, was contaminated
                           by pathogens due to urban runoff/storm sewers and pasture
 grazing. Pathogen inputs to the creek were reduced by stabilizing erosion-prone areas
 near animal feeding operations and relocating the discharge point for the city of Etowah's
 stormwater discharge. As a result. Cane Creek was removed from Tennessee's 303(d) list.
 Problem
 Effluent from the city of Etowah's sewage
 treatment plant and runoff from cattle and
 poultry production areas contributed to the
 high levels of pathogens in Cane Creek. Of
 12 fecal coliform samples collected between
 1993 and 1996, 4 samples exceeded the fecal
 coliform criterion of 1,000 colonies per 100 ml.
 In 2002 Cane Creek was added to the state's
 303(d) list as impaired by pathogens due to
 urban runoff/storm sewers and pasture grazing
 in the watershed.
 Project Highlights
 Poultry and cattle farmers in the Cane Creek
 watershed installed conservation treatments
 known as heavy-use areas (HUAs). HUAs
 usually use geotextile material and gravel to
 stabilize soil in areas containing large concen-
 trations of animals, thereby preventing soil ero-
 sion and improving water quality. Nine HUAs
 were installed on a large (400-acre) farm in the
 Cane Creek watershed and three more were
 installed on a smaller farm according to Natural
 Resources Conservation Service design
 standards. In addition to the HUAs, fencing
 was installed to exclude cattle from streams
 and stream crossing to minimize erosion where
 crossings are necessary. Trees were planted
 in critical areas to decrease soil erosion and
 provide additional habitat.
                              The city of Etowah's sewage treatment plant
                              moved its stormwater discharge to another
                              stream. The city had historically discharged to
                              Cane Creek, which was previously assessed as
                              impaired by pathogens on the basis of sampling
                              results from the 1990s.
                              Results
                              By 2004 pathogen levels had reached accept-
                              able levels as a result of the best management
                              practices (BMPs) implemented throughout the
                              watershed. Of the nine fecal coliform samples
                              collected between 1999 and 2004, only one
                              sample exceeded the E. coli criterion of 941
                              colonies per 100  ml. Although the fecal coli-
                              form criterion had been replaced byf. coli,
                               3500
                               3000
                               2500
                               2000
                               1500
                               1000
                               500
                                           ^
                                                   Fecal Coliform
                                       Number of fecal coliform colonies per 100 ml at Cane Creek
                                       River Mile 1.5 in McMinn County 1993-2004. Data collected by
                                       Water Pollution Control, Tennessee Department of Environmental
                                       Conservation.

-------
           levels were reduced to 640 colonies or fewer,
           which is below the criterion of 1,000 colonies
           per 100 ml that was used to list the stream.
           As a result, Cane Creek was removed from
           Tennessee's 303(d) list in 2004.
           Partners and Funding
           The U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural
           Resources Conservation Service and the
           McMinn County Soil Conservation District
           helped design and implement many of the
           BMPs. The project cost a total of $36,550,
           funded through the Agricultural Resources
           Conservation Fund (ARCF) and $7,576 of Clean
           Water Act section 319 funding that was used
           for critical area plantings, HUAs, and a stream
           crossing.
I
5
Q
'.    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
 \   Office of Water
 a   Washington, DC

     EPA841-F-05-004Q
     August 2005
For additional information contact:
Sam Marshall, PhD
Tennessee Department of Agriculture
615-837-5306
sam.marshall@state.tn.us

-------