1

              Section 319
              NOKPOINT SOIHCE  PPHGRAM SUCCESS STORY
 Aquatic Life Use Restored in Agricultural Watershed
WatPrbndv Irnnrnvpd   Agricultural runoff decimated macroinvertebrate life in a 1.9-
            '}     *   -*..»   mjte segment of the Mills River in western North Carolina.
 Because the segment failed to meet aquatic life criteria. North Carolina placed it on the
 state's 303(d) list of impaired waters in 1998. Local and state water quality experts worked
 with the community to implement several best management practices, including moving
 pesticide mixing stations away from river banks and restoring vegetated buffers. Water
 quality improved enough to once again support macroinvertebrate life, and the state
 expects to remove the river segment from  its 303(d) list in 2006.


 Problem

 The Mills River supplies drinking water for more
 than 50,000 people in three western North
 Carolina counties. Areas upstream from the
 town of Hendersonville are home to many intensely
 managed agricultural activities, including the
 production of cattle and specialty crops such
 as tomatoes. Officials suspected that these
 operations contributed sediments and pesti-
 cides to a 1.9-mile river segment extending
 upstream from the town's water intake.

 The state conducted benthos sampling in
 the river segment and used the EPT index to
 measure the presence of pollution-sensitive
 aquatic insects. The index assumes that a
 waterbody showing high EPT richness is less
 likely to be polluted than another waterbody
 with relatively low EPT richness in the same
 geographic region. In addition, the state mea-
 sured biotic integrity (Bl) in the river segment.
 A low Bl value indicates better water quality
 than a high Bl value.

 As shown in the accompanying table, monitor-
 ing results from both indices revealed that the
 segment met state water quality standards
 for aquatic life support in 1997. In subsequent
 years, however, the North Carolina Division  of
 Water Quality (NC DWQ) found much lower
 EPT and higher Bl values, indicating a decline
 in water quality. In 1998, NC DWQ assigned a
                                This chemical-handling facility replaced one that was
                                directly adjacent to Mills River.
Year
1997
1998
2001
2002
EPT
24
2
6
28
Bl
5.17
6.69
—
5.54
State assessment rating
Good-Fair
Poor
Poor
Good-Fair
                                Mills River biomonitoring results using the EPT
                                index and Bl. Low EPT/high Bl indicate poor water
                                quality, while high EPT/low Bl suggest good water
                                quality.

                                Poor rating to the river segment and placed it
                                on the state's 303(d) list.
                                Project Highlights
                                State and local water quality experts teamed
                                with landowners and other organizations to
                                address suspected pollutant loading sources

-------
Streambank and buffer restoration shortly after tree
planting. Small trees are in the tall grass on the left.

to the river segment. Project partners obtained
three conservation easements totaling 192
acres, designated and planted 7.8 acres of
riparian buffers, and restored nearly 4,700
linear feet of streambanks. In addition, they
moved two chemical mixing  stations away
from river tributaries.

To address the sources of sediment, project
partners stabilized 10 miles of logging  roads,
installed 2,580 linear feet of cattle fencing, and
created 400 feet of stock trails to reduce cattle
traffic on steep slopes. Area  cattle operations
received two water tanks, further helping to
keep cattle away from streams.

Public outreach also played a role in the
restoration effort. Workshops educated local
agriculture producers about the dangers of
pesticides in the river. Local  residents received
general watershed education.

Finally, project partners established a
stormwater  monitoring program in 2001.
Results
Restoration efforts resulted in dramatic water
quality improvements, as confirmed by benthic
monitoring. In 2002, NC DWQ macroinver-
tebrate sampling showed a much richer EPT
index of 28 and a stronger Bl of 5.54. Both indi-
ces placed the river segment in the Good-Fair
assessment rating, placing the river segment
in compliance with its aquatic life support
designation. With such a positive result, North
Carolina expects to remove this river segment
from its 303(d) list in 2006. Macroinvertebrate
monitoring will continue, with the next sam-
pling event scheduled for the summer of 2007.

Gains will  be lost, however, if work does not
continue. The Mills River watershed is in
western North Carolina's fastest growing area.
Keeping pace with development impacts is
essential if designated uses are to be sus-
tained. The state's future plans include restor-
ing a mile  of vegetated buffer and constructing
a chemical mixing building that will eliminate
two additional streamside mixing stations.
Partners and Funding
Numerous groups worked together successfully
to restore this segment of the Mills River. The
NC DWQ supported the work with a 319 grant of
$448,000. The state's Clean Water Management
Trust Fund provided $730,000, and the partners
used a $50,000 EPA Source Water Protection
grant to create land conversion inventories and
hold meetings and workshops.

Many agencies and organizations contrib-
uted services and funds,  including North
Carolina's Divisions of Forest Resources and
Soil and Water Conservation; N.C. Ecosystem
Enhancement Program; N.C. Wildlife
Resources Commission;  N.C. State University
Mountain Horticultural  Crops Research
Station; Henderson County; Henderson
County Soil and Water  Conservation District;
Environmental Conservation Organization
of Henderson County;  U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Forest Service, and Natural
Resources Conservation  Service; Carolina
Mountain Land Conservancy; City of Asheville's
Water Treatment Plant; City of Hendersonville;
Cross Creek Foundation;  Land of Sky Regional
Council; Tennessee Valley Authority; Trout
Unlimited (Land of Sky Chapter);  North and
South Mills River Community Development
Center; Regional  Water Authority of Asheville,
Buncombe and Henderson Counties; University
of North Carolina at Asheville's Environmental
Quality Institute;  and Mills River Partnership.
 .    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
 \  Off ice of Water
     Washington, DC
     EPA841-F-06-003D
     June 2006
For additional information contact:
Michelle Raquet
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
919-733-5083 ext. 367
Michelle.Raquet@ncmail.net

-------