-------
N/r\ Is the distribution function of the fog droplets in size (radii) r.
To date the A. Kh. Khrgian - I. P. Mazin distribution function [7] has found
extensive applications.
P(r) is the total amount of impurity absorbed per unit time by a fog
droplet of radius r. The determination of this quantity is a complex problem,
since the fog droplets are in constant motion. However, even for the stable
stratification characteristic of fogs, the microscale of the atmospheric
turbulence substantially exceeds the size of the largest droplets. As a re-
sult, the displacement of the droplets together with the air stream does not
affect the quantity P(r), which is determined only by the molecular diffusion
of the impurity toward the droplet. For this reason, the magnitude of P(r)
depends only on the flow around the fog droplet because of its settling by
gravity. Neglecting the effect of flow around the droplet
Here D is the coefficient of molecular diffusion of the impurity in air.
In deriving this formula, the boundary condition used is the hypothesis of
complete absorption of the impurity on the surface of the droplet, which is
usually fulfilled. V. 6. Levich [5] points out that for gases highly soluble
in water, the rate of their absorption on the surface of the droplet is de-
termined only by the rate of diffusive supply, i. e., the processes considered
follow diffusion kinetics. Formula (3) has been known for a long time and
widely applied in various investigations: [1, 2, 5, 6, etc.].
In [l] and [2], a formula is given for calculating the coefficient a,
based on the function proposed by Khrgian-Mazin for N(r) and formula (3) for
P(r). Its use has made it possible to solve the problem of influence of
fogs on the diffusion of impurities to a first approximation. The object of
the present paper is to find a correction to the quantity P(r), caused by
the flow of an airstream around a droplet during its settling, from the so-
lution of the equation of molecular diffusion for a moving medium:
Ac = PeV grade. (4)
Here c is a dimensionless concentration of the impurity near the droplet,
normalized to the quantity q; the quantity c is a function of the dimensionless
radius vector of point r, normalized to the droplet radius RQ; the velocity
vector of the motion of the droplet relative to the medium V is normalized to
the settling rate of the droplet UQ^ The Peclet number Pe is the determining
parameter for the process studied.
Pe = -<>. = Re Pr; Re^-fL; Pr==JL. (5)
Here v is the molecular viscosity of air, and Re and Pr are the Reynolds
and Prandtl numbers. The quantities v and D for air are close to one another,
i. e., PrasL, Pe*&e [5, 6]. For droplet radii RQ characteristic of a fog and
settling rates UQ determined by them, the values of Pe and Re are substanti-
ally less than unity and reach 0.2-0.3 for only the largest droplets. Under
-------
such conditions, approximate formulas of Stokes and Oseen are known for V [4].
The Stokes formula was obtained by neglecting the inertia terms in the equation
of motion for a viscous liquid and applies only to very small distances from
the droplet surface. The Stokes velocity distribution was used in the study of
many problems [6], [8l, [9], similar in mathematical formulation to the problem
of interest to us (evaporation of droplets, heat emission from spherical bodies
exposed to blowing, etc.)* As indicated in [4], Oseen's solution for low given
Re values yields better results at a considerable distance from the droplet than
does the Stokes solution.
We shall utilize the smallness of the parameter Pe and seek the solution of
equation (4) in the form of a series in powers of the small parameter e«Pe
i + ••• (6)
Substituting (6) into (4) and equating terms in £ of the same order of
smallness, for the zero approximation to the desired solution we obtain the
Laplace equation
for the first approximation, the Poisson equation
AC[ = V grad 0
etc.
For the zero approximation, the same boundary conditions on the surface
of the sphere and at infinity are used as for the complete solution of equation
(4):
npu r = |r| — 1 cQ — Q;
-*cs> c0-~l. (9)
The solution of (7) for a spherically symmetrical region is of the form
For boundary conditions (9) for P(r), formula (3) results from (10), i. e.,
as should have been expected, the zero approximation describes the absorption
of an impurity that is stationary relative to the medium of droplets.
For C£ at i>l, homogeneous boundary conditions are assumed.
On the basis of the first approximation, we shall evaluate the correction
to the absorption of an impurity by a droplet caused by settling of the latter.
The solution of equation (S) is written in general form via the Green
function [3]
-------
Here Q is the radius vector of a point with variable coordinates located
inside the area of solution and do is the volume element
(12)
GI and GO are respectively the singular and nonslngular parts of the Green
function.
The singular part of the Green function has the following form:
where
... CO . ...
Tr^TT-S^^ PWCOS°): (14)
Pwx) are Legendre polynomials, 6 is the angle between vectors r and Q, and r
ana p are the moduli of these vectors.
where H(x) is the Heaviside unit function,
Of°r X<0~>
for
In order for the nonsingular part of the Green function GQ to satisfy the
boundary conditions, it must be chosen in the following form:
fp . (16)
From (10) it follows that
(17)
We shall subsequently use a spherical coordinate system whose origin is
at the center of the droplet, and the polar axis is directed vertically down-
ward.
Equation (14) will then be rewritten as
co r
TF=TT-2o*('>. P)[^ (cos »,)/>, (cos &,) + (18)
» ~1
+ 2 2 [* + "!! cos (, - ?p) Picas (0,) P"k cos (ft,) .
«=i j
Here quantities 0 and
-------
In deriving (19) It was considered that
f, 2 COS/l(^-?,)^ (C08dr
and • .
The formula for the radial component of the dimensionless relative wind
velocity V according to Oseen is
<20>
— .
When this formula is used, better results should be expected than when
the Stokes formula is employed, since c^ is expressed in terms of the velocity
field over the entire space, and not only in the area adjacent to the droplet.
In order to solve the problem of absorption of an impurity by a droplet,
it is necessary to define the total flow of impurity PI
(21)
It is much simpler to find P^ than to determine the solution for ci.
Indeed, if one considers that because of the orthogonality of the Legendre
polynomials the contribution to PI is made only by the term of the series
entering into (19) corresponding to k- 0, then
(22)
After some simple but cumbersome transformations we find that
/>ira_^.p0PeRe^-4.p0Re», (23)
where PQ is the flow of impurity onto the droplet in the zero approximation.
Finally,
/>«P0 + PlSsip0(l-i-RePe).
From the solution obtained it follows the motion of fog droplets slightly
decreases the absorption of the impurity from air, but this correction does
not exceed a few per cent. This permits the use of formula (3) in studying
the characteristics of diffusion of gaseous impurities in fogs.
The results obtained in the present paper may be applied to the evaluation
of the trapping of an impurity by cloud droplets, to the study of evaporation
-------
of fine droplets, etc. In particular, from the solution obtained it follows
that at low Re numbers and assuming an Oseen-type flow, the evaporation of a
falling droplet is somewhat less than the evaporation of a stationary droplet,
As in the case of the problem considered above, this is also because of the
fact that the first-approximation correction has a sign opposite to the sign
of the flow in the zero approximation.
LITERATURE CITED
1. B e p n si H A M. E., 0 >i H K y n P. H., P H 6 o a a F. B. K reopnH atMOC(j)epHofl
B yc-noBHHx TVMaxa. TpyAU ITO, sun. 207, 1968.
2. 3 H M H H A. T. BbiMHBaHHe paAHoaKTHBiiux aspoapjieft 113 aTMoc(pepw ocaAKaiini. C6.
«Bonpocw HAepHOft Meieopo^orHH*. AroMHaAar, M., 1962.
3. HaaHeHKo R. H., COKOJIOB A. A. K^accHiecKan Teopiis no-ns. TocTexHaAaT,
M.-^.. 1951.
4. KOM H H H. E., KiiCe^b H. A., Pose H. B. TeopeTUMecxan niApOMexauHKa. HacTbll.
H3MaTrH3, M., 1963.
5. JleBHI B. F. H3HKO-XIIMHieCK4H THApOAHHaMliKa. ll3MaTrH3, M., 1959.
6. 4>yKc H. A. HcnapeHHe H pocr xane^b B raaootipaaxoft cpeae. Hsa. AH CCCP, At.,
1958.
7. X p r H a H A. X., M a 3 n H H. FI. O pacnpeAeJiemiH Kane^b ryMaua no pasMepaM a 06-
. TpyAU UAO, sun. 7. 1962.
H. L,
8. F r i s c h H. L, Steady-state diffusion into a streaming sphere at low Reyholds num-
ber. J. Chem. Phys. 22, 123, 1954.
9. K r o n I g R., B r u i j s t e n J. On the theory of the heat and mass transfer from
a sphere in a flowing medium at low values of Reyholds' number. App. Sc. Res.
vol. A. 2, N 5-6, 439. 1951.
-------
RECORDING OF DUST CONCENTRATIONS IN THE ATMOSPHERE
S. A. Kon'kov
From Trudy, Glavnaya Geoflz. Observat. im. A. I. Voeykova, No. 234,
p. 181-187, (1968).
In organizing a system for control of the degree of atmospheric pollution
with industrial discharges, it is very important to develop methods for re-
cording the concentration of noxious substances in the ground layer of air.
At the present time, determinations of dusrt and ash concentrations in the
atmosphere are made by means of the suction method [1], which yields discrete
values of the weight concentration averaged over 20 minutes.
The accuracy of the method is low, and large random errors are possible.
An increase in the accuracy and decrease in the interval of sampling are
associated with considerable technical difficulties.
The use of instruments and techniques providing for automatic recording
and processing of data makes it possible to obtain time and space character-
istics of concentration fields with a great accuracy and reliability.
Among the methods for studying aerosols that offer the possibility of a
simple conversion of the measured quantities into an electric signal and
hence its automatic recording (ionization, radiometric, electric quantities,
etc.), the optical methods, which are relative, have become comparatively
popular. They permit the determination of the concentration without precipi-
tation of the solid phase of the aerosol, and quick response measurements in
an undistorted flow.
Methods which involve the use of precipitation of the solid phase on a
filter make it possible to increase the sensitivity and also to perform a
further analysis of the aerosol studied (chemical, gravimetric, dispersion
analysis).
A convenient method is the determination of the concentration from the
optical density of the solid phase of the aerosol deposited on a filter, since
by obtaining the relative value of the concentration, one can switch to a con-
stant calibration of the instrument and to the determination of the concentra-
tion by weight. The humidity content of air has no appreciable influence on
the optical density of the filter, but depends on the physical properties and
the particle size composition of the aerosol studied.
A filtration method using an automatic collection of samples from the
atmosphere and a photometric determination of the aerosol concentration are
-------
used in many countries. In Czechoslovakia, an instrument has been constructed
for automatic sampling and measurement of aerosol samples, i. e., an automatic
recording aerosol concentrometer [3]. It operates on the principle of ultra-
filtration by means of a tape membrane filter 15 mm wide which during the
sampling moves continuously at rates from 6 cm/hr to 18 cm/hr. Simultaneously
with the sampling, photometric readings are taken on the tape (the absorption
of light by the aerosol track on the tape filter is measured) in order to ob-
tain the variation of the aerosol concentration with time. Each value is
averaged over 2 or 6 min. Thus, the instrument records the variation of the
concentration of aerosols in the course of 8-24 hr, and the sample on the
filter is kept for further processing, mainly microscopic. In determining
the weight concentration for each type of aerosol, it is necessary to carry
out a multiple calibration of the instrument.
The weight of the sample of solid-phase aerosol on the filter is deter-
mined by measuring the change of the optical density of the filter. The light
flux Io, which has passed through the filter alone, and the light flux I, which
has passed through the same filter with the collected solid-phase aerosol I,
are related by the Lambert-Beer law as follows:
/- = /„,-*', (1)
where k is the light absorption coefficient and I is the path length in the
given medium.
Known instruments of this type [3] can record only relative values of the
aerosol concentration. However, according to. the existing experimental data,
the values of coefficient k are constant for 24 hours at the same location
with a sufficient degree of accuracy. Their change with time can be related
to the daily variation of meteorological elements and to the change of the
conditions of discharge from the sources of particles. On this basis, a
method for recording dust: concentration that provides a constant calibration
of the instrument by the gravimetric method (during a certain period of time)
with continuous recording of the optical density of the dust sample on the
filter is proposed in the present paper.
The optical density of the filter with the collected sample is given by
the relations
D--=\s-f- it-ill 0 = s/, (2)
where e=0.4343fc.
The weight of the sample of solid-phase aerosol on the filter may be
expressed as
where P0 is the weight of the filter alone, P is the weight of the same
filter with the sample, which occupies an area S, and y is the specific
gravity of the sample on the filter. It then follows from (2) that
-------
i-A
For the weight concentration 1s=~y~~ we obtain from (3)
,
£) = 8_. „„,,, tf-
where 70 is the volume of air pumped through the filter and reduced to
standard conditions.
It is apparent from (4) that the weight concentration of the aerosol
q may be determined via the optical density of the filter, knowing the
coefficient kt which is a quantity characteristic of each aerosol and de-
pends on its physical properties and dispersity.
The method essentially consists in the following. The tape filter is
weighed before and after the sampling, processed in a photometric instru-
ment to determine the decrease of the light flux in relative units, then
A "
the calibration coefficient A/= -> where ^.V, — is the total
change of the light flux, is determined. The calculation of the concentra-
tion at any instant of time is defined as Q - MN^ , where N. is the change
of the light flux on the given portion of filter.
To record the dust concentration over a longer period of time, use is
made of an intake tube permitting collection of the sample on the filter,
suction of air through the filter, and rewinding of the tape filter. Sub-
sequent gravimetric and photometric analyses are carried out in the labor-
atory, thus simplifying the processing of the tapes. If necessary, the
sampler may be combined with the photometric instrument. In this case,
the density of the sample is measured and recorded during the sampling.
The sampler includes an aspirator with an air flowmeter and a cart-
ridge with a tape transport system. The tape filter is wound Inside the
cartridge from the feeding reel to the take-up reel by means of a synch rous
motor via a reducer. The tape passes in front of a slit with a nozzle,
from which the air, after passing through the filter, is sucked into an
air tube connected to the flowmeter and aspirator.
To test the method, samples were taken during an 8-hour interval on
a fine-fibered LFS-250 tape filter. The transport rate of the filter was
6 cm/hr, the slit size was 10 x 30 mm, and the exposure of each portion
of the filter, 10 min. The aspirator provides for an air flow of 50 Z/min
and is designed for operation on 220 V alternating current.
The system for photometric processing of the filter tape (Fig. 1)
consists of the tape transport mechanism of a recording photometer using
the simplest differential circuit. The sensing elements used were FSK-2
photoresistors, and the illuminator was an 8W incandescent bulb.
-------
The unbalanced signal is fed into an EPP-09 recorder.
This method differs from similar ones developed in other countries in
the fact that the sampling is made on NEL-4 tape filter, which has better
filtering properties. The photometric instrument uses a simple measuring
circuit including FSK-type sensing elements.
Tests of the combined sampler and photometric instrument were also per-
formed. The use of round AFA-30 filters of FPP fabric is possible for taking
samples during a 20-minute period. In this case, there is no need for a tape
transport system, the photometric analysis is performed simultaneously with
the sampling, but the recording is made in the form of traces of integrated
values of attenuation of the light flux as the solid phase deposits on the
filter. The circuit of the photometer is identical to the one described above.
A drawback of this instrument lies in the limitation of the time of sampling
on one filter and in the difficulty of eliminating the influence of sunlight
on the measuring circuit of the photometer.
In the development of the instrument, considerable attention was concen-
trated on the selection of the filtering material, since its characteristics
determine the accuracy of the method. The applicability of filters to the
mechod is determined by their mechanical, filtering and optical properties.
Tests were made on filters of cellulose filter paper, membrane filters,
and filters from fine-fiber polymer materials FPP-15, NEL and LFS developed
at the L. Ya. Karpov NIFKhl. The cellulose-paper filters have a number of
serious disadvantages in both filtering and optical properties, and in gravi-
metric analysis. Membrane filters are characterized by a high filtering
efficiency and an adequate mechanical strength, which makes it possible to
increase the accuracy of the measurements considerably as compared with the
cellulose-paper filters. However, their hydraulic resistance is very high,
and coarse particles deposited on the filter may fall away. Filters made of
fine-fibered filtering materials are characterized by a high filtering
efficiency at high linear suction velocities and by a moderate hydraulic
resistance.
i
Disadvantages of the FPP-15 fabric are its low optical homogeneity, low
mechanical strength, and the possibility of separation of the fibers during
the suction of air. These disadvantages have been eliminated in NEL and LFS
filters, which surpass the membrane filters in optical homogeneity.
The general accuracy of determination of the weight concentration is not
a constant quantity in the absence of a rigid calibration of the instrument.
The accuracy category of the recording system is 0.5, and the stability of
the photometric circuit, 95%. The reproducibility of; successive processing
steps of the same tape lies within a single division. The overall sensitiv-
ity based on the weight concentration, obtained by processing ten filters,
amounts to an average of 0.013 mg m3/div. Without preliminary photometric
analysis of the filter alone (before sampling), the magnitude of the optical
inhomogeneity of the filter alone is within the total error of determination
-------
i
T--P--TT--
. -!''.» .1
Fig. 1. Photometric instrument for processing filter tape.
of the concentration. Fig. 2 shows graphs of the change in the optical
density of tape filters made of different filtering materials. The observa-
tional material is insufficient for a definitive evaluation of the filters,
but one can reach the preliminary conclusion that the KEL and LFS type
filters surpass the others in optical homogeneity. The technical character-
istics of these filters, based on the data of [2], are given in the table.
As a result of the tests, NEL filters 50 mm wide were taken for subsequent
work.
Measurements made with different light filters by absorption (Fig. 3 a)
and by a reflectometric method (Fig. 3 b) repeat the measurements of absorp-
tion of incident light flux without a light filter with sufficient accuracy,
indicating the homogeneity of the optical properties of the particles collec-
ted on the filter.
The results obtained permit the assumption that by perfecting the
measurement circuit one can increase the accuracy of the recording of the
dust concentration in the atmosphere.
The models of instruments described require certain structural improve-
ments, but on the whole they meet the requirements of the method. These in-
struments were used in Leningrad in the autumn of 1967 to carry out measure-
ments of dust concentration, an analysis of which is given below.
-------
The Intake tube was located at a height of 2 m above the surface of
the ground In an open area. There were no heavy sources of industrial
atmospheric pollution within a radius of 2-3 km. The samples were taken
in September-November in the daytime (9 A.M.-5 PiM.) with the exception
of days with precipitation (20 series in all).
div
£ =,__,__
rTV>-T-/rT"r--r?-r-r--fn
10 20 30 W SO SO 70 80
cm
Pig. 2. Change of.the optical density cf tape filters from
various filtering materials.
a - NEL filter; b - cellulose-paper filter;
o - LFS filtur; d - membrane filter.
Table
Parameter
Resistance. at air flow rate of
0.06Z /mm cm2, mm HoO
Breakthrough coefficient, %
Tape weight, ng/crf-
Fiber diameter, y
Working temperature range, dog.
NEL
1,6-30
10
6
1,5
50
LFS
1,6-W
5
0,3tO,l
0,5^0,1
50
The data obtained from the recording of dust concentration in the
atmosphere in the course of the day were compared with the meteorological
conditions. The highest values of the concentrations, 0.4-0.9 mg/m^, were
usually observed in the morning hours. In the second half of the day, the
magnitude of the dust concentration decreased. Of the total number of
observations, it is possible to isolate cases where the average concentra-
tion was 0.1-0.2 mg/m3 and underwent little change during the entire day.
At the same time, the meteorological conditions were characterized by a
relatively stable west-east transport at a wind velocity of 4-15 in/sec
in the lower 500-meter layer.
-------
01
IO
n, div.
100r-
30 -
80 -
70
60
SO
30
20
10
J I L
J L
to
20
30
_L L
SO
J L
n, div.
/OO r-
30 -
80 -
60
30
20
10
V
I I I I I I
60
70
20
30
A I I I I I L_J
SO
GO
70
Fig. 3a. Measurements of change in the optical density of tape filter performed with different light filters, based
on the absorption of light flux:
1 - with red light filter; 2 - without light filter? 3 - with green light filter; 4 - with blue light filter.
Fig. 3b. Measurement of change ir, the optical density of tape filter performed without light filters based on
-------
As an example, Fig. A gives the results of processing of the recorder
tapes (the sampling was made on November 20, 21, and 22 1967).
The method of measurements described above enables one to obtain the
values of the weight concentration of dust with the necessary accuracy and
to record the cycle of concentration change simultaneously with the sampling
and afterwards.
20 ' 21 22 NOV. I, cm
Pig. 4. Dust concentrations in atmospheric air
recorded November 20, 21, and 22 1967
in Leningrad.
LITERATURE CITED
1. HiiCTpyKTiiiiiio-MCTOjui'itiCKiii- yK(i:i:iiiiia no opraiiiciaimn iicc.ne.rtouajiiiH aTMOc<|)epnoro
uo3;iy.\a. Akvinn, M., i'JUl
2. C n y p a w ii K. u ;i|>. Aspoaojni. Aro\;mnut, IOG7.
3. Polydorova M. Autoniulifchu Kt-ffisirifrffcrSt zur Mcssung der Konzcnlralionen
von Acrosolt'ii. Iiitcnialionales symposium Libico, oklobcr, 1965.
-------
COEFFICIENT OF TURBULENT EXCHANGE IN THE GROUND LAYER IN THE DAYTIME
DURING THE SUMMER IN VARIOUS GEOGRAPHICAL REGIONS OF THE USSR
V. P. Gracheva
From Trudy, Glavnaya Geofiz. Observat. im. A. I. Voeykova, No. 234,
p. 152-161, (1968)
In the study of the diffusion of impurities in the atmosphere and in the
solution of a great many other problems it is important to know the character-
istics of distribution of the vertical component of the turbulence coefficient
in the ground layer of air under various climatic conditions.
It is known from theoretical studies [1, 2] and studies involving analysis
of experimental material [3] that, for example, in the presence of discharges
of noxious substances into the air from high smokestacks, the impurity concen-
tration at some distance from the source increases with an intensification of
turbulent exchange. A heavier air pollution at high values of the turbulence
coefficient is also observed in cities, where sources of discharges of differ-
ent heights are present [4]. For this reason, the study of the maximum inten-
sity of turbulent exchange in different geographical regions is of substantial
interest. According to the available literature data, the maximum turbulent
exchange is usually observed in the superadiabatlc state of the atmosphere,
which usually occurs in summer at noontime.
Some patterns of distribution of one of the characteristics of turbulence
in the ground layer were studied in [5] over the territory of the USSR under
these conditions. The object of the present paper was to make an additional
study of the characteristics of this distribution by using data on the verti-
cal component of the turbulence coefficient, a component calculated by the
heat balance method. This method is characterized by a certain degree of
objectivity, and is independent of many hypotheses underlying other methods
of calculation of the turbulence coefficient. By analyzing a large volume of
experimental material [6, 7, etc. ] it has now been established that in the
lowest layer, which is of the order of several meters, the change of air
temperature and humidity with the height is adequately described by a loga-
rithmic law.
Representing the variations of air temperature and humidity with the
height in accordance with the logarithmic law and assuming the turbulence
coefficients for heat and moisture in the ground layer to be approximately
equal in magnitude, we write the following formula for the vertical component
of the turbulent exchange coefficient at a height of 1 m:
*»-«(/?-(>).
Here R is the radiation balance at the level of the underlying surface in
-------
rt
cal/cm min; Q is the heat flow between the underlying surface and the sub-
jacent layers of the soil in cal/cm^ min; ot= 0.74 . where At0 and At" mb
At +1.56Ae
are the differences of temperatures and absolute humidity of air between the
heights of 0.5 and 2.0 m. The numerical factors 0.74 and 1.56 were obtained
by substituting the values L»600 cal/g, p=1.293 x 10~3 g/cm3, cp=0.24 cal/g
deg and p»1000 mb.
To calculate the turbulence coefficient from formula (1), as in [5], use
was made of observational material of heat balance stations for the 1 P.M.
period in July during the period of operation of the stations from 1955 to
1967. Up to 1961-1962, the tables of gradient observations contained all the
necessary initial data for the calculation of kj for each day: the measured
values of R, At and Ae, calculated from the measured temperature and humidity
of air at two levels, and Q, determined from the temperature and humidity of
the soil according to the method presented in [8]. The calculation of the
values of the turbulence coefficient for each day is therefore relatively easy,
particularly since the value of a in (1) has been tabulated. From the values
of ki calculated for each day, one can readily compute the mean monthly values
of the turbulence coefficient for individual years and then the average for a
number of years.
From 1962 on, the calculation of daily values of the heat flow in the
soil was not made at the stations; its calculation for each day at a large
number of stations in the course of several years is very laborious. It is
of interest, therefore, to examine the possibility of using mean monthly
values of the initial data for calculating the turbulence coefficient. On the
basis of observational material of 30 stations (pflOO cases) located in differ-
ent geographical regions, the turbulence coefficient was calculated for a
number of years for 1 P.M. in July from both the mean monthly values of the
initial data in individual years k'i (R, Q, At, Se) and daily values k"i(R, Q,
At, Ae). Before 1962, the mean monthly values of the meteorological para-
meters on the network of heat balance stations were not computed. They were
calculated by first using the mean monthly values available from a number of
stations, calculated under the direction of T. A. Ogneva and kindly supplied
to the author. From 1962 on, the heat flow between the underlying surface and
the subjacent layers was calculated daily at all of the above-indicated stat-
ions. Results of the comparison of mean monthly values of ki for the indi-
vidual years are shown in the form of points in Fig. 1. Mean monthly values
of k] calculated by the heat balance method from initial data averaged over a
month are laid off along the x axis, and values of ki calculated from daily
data and then averaged over the month are laid off along the y axis. Of the
100 cases considered, in only 10 was the relative averaging error
T.ffi 'Q,M, &)-*,(/?. Q, A/, V)
£,<. Q. V, to) (2)
greater than 30%; its average in absolute value was 15.3%.
Fig. 1 also compares the mean monthly values of k"{ and R, averaged over
several years at each of the 30 stations (circled points). The mean averag-
ing error was 7.7%.
-------
It is evident from Fig. 1 that deviations from the bisector are observed
on both of its sides, with a certain exaggeration of the £' yalues calculated
from initial data averaged over the month.
0,2
0,1
0.1
Fig. 1.
The calculation of the turbulence coefficient by the heat balance method
from both daily and mean monthly initial data may in some cases involve con-
siderable errors, for example, at low values of the difference between the
radiation balance and the heat flow into the soil or at low values of the dif-
ferences in air temperatures and humidity at the two levels. Allowing for
the accuracy of the measurement of meteorological parameters with network in-
struments (0.01 cal/cm2 min. for R and Q and 0.2° C. and 0.2 mb for At and
Ae), possible relative errors in the calculation of the turbulence coeffic-
ient from formula (1) were determined for different values of the initial
data (Fig. 2).
In determining the turbulence coefficient from formula (1), only cases
assumed to contain a relative error of no more than 40% were considered.
In addition, the computation of mean monthly values of ki from the calculated
daily values was made only when the number of k-, values computed with a rela-
tive error of 40% or less was greater than or equal to 10 per month. In
addition to the above-mentioned 30 stations, the data of heat balance obser-
vations of 39 stations (total of 69 stations) were also considered for the
same period. The calculation of the turbulence coefficient based on data
of these stations was made only on the basis of mean monthly initial data.
-------
The great majority of the stations are located on the European territory
of the USSR, with the exception of its northeastern part, and also in Kazakhstan
and Central Asia, while approximately one-third of all the stations are located
on the territory of Siberia and the Far East. The series of kj_ values calcu-
lated for the individual years during the above indicated observation period
from 1955 to 1967 at the different stations were found to be different as a
result of both the limitations adopted in the treatment ( A/SI ^40%), and an un-
' ki ^
coordinated opening of the heat balance stations, some of which were opened in
the last 2-3 years.
R-O cal/m2 min.
Fig. 2. Possible relative
errors (%) of the calcula-
tion of the turbulence
coefficient (k) by the heat
balance method.
0,2-
The present paper uses only the data of the existing stations, which are
considered more or less representative of the heat balance observations. At
37 stations, the kj values calculated for the individual years were averaged
over 3 years or more; at 28 stations, over 1 to 2 years, and at 4 stations,
because of the above-indicated limitations of treatment, the turbulence co-
efficient could not be determined.
The manner in which the mean value of the turbulence coefficient devi-
ates from the period of averaging can be determined by using, according to
[9], a successive averaging over all the longer periods beginning with the
last year of observations. To this end, data on the turbulence coefficient
were selected at several stations with longer series of observations. Aver-
age values for 1, 2, 3, etc. years were calculated starting in 1967. Re-
sults of the calculation are shown in Table 1. Average values of ki from
the longest observation period at our disposal (they were different at differ-
ent stations) were arbitrarily taken as the norm. Deviations (%) of the mean
values for 1, 2, 3, etc. years from the norm (part II of the table) were then
calculated.
-------
It is obvious from the table that for a relatively short averaging period
(1-2 years), the deviation from the norm does not exceed 20% at most stations,
and that deviations in excess of 30% are observed at only 2 stations.
Table 2 gives mean values of the turbulence coefficient for increasing
periods of averaging and deviation from the norm (according to the data of
[5]). Analysis of this table shows that at the majority of the stations con-
sidered, deviations of the norm for averaging periods of 1 to 3 years also do
not exceed 20%, and at only three stations out of 26 are the deviations less
than 30%. It should be noted that the averages for short periods (1-3 years)
frequently differ from averages for longer periods by no more than 10%. Hence,
short series of observations can be used without a large error, especially
when the aim is to determine the basic patterns of distribution of some element.
Values of k^ computed for several years or even for 1 to 2 years give some
idea of the distribution of the turbulence coefficient in the ground layer over
the territory of the USSR.
The average July values of the turbulence coefficient for 1 P.M. and
values of kj/ui, where u-|_ is the wind velocity at a height of 1 m, are shown in
Table 3. Values of k"i were calculated from mean monthly initial data for indi-
vidual years and then averaged over the indicated period. The k^ values were
calculated from daily initial data, then averaged over the month and over the
entire period.
It is apparent from the table that the highest values of the turbulence
coefficient in the ground layer (0.20-0.25 m2/sec.) in July at noon are observed,
as in [5], in the desert of Central Asia, Kazakhstan, regions of the lower Volga,
and in the south of the Ukraine. In the central regions of the European terri-
tory and also in the foothills of the Southern Ural, Pamir, Tyan'-Shan', Altay,
and Sayan, the values of the turbulence coefficient obtained by the heat balance
method were somewhat higher (0.15-0.20 m2/sec.) as compared to ki (0.12-0.15 m2/
sec.) for the same regions in [5]. As far as Transbaykal'ye, northern Siberia,
and the northeast of the European territory are concerned, the ki values here
were approximately the same in magnitude as in [5] and equal to 0.12-0.18 m2/sec.
The highest values of the turbulence coefficient are found in the regions where
the highest wind velocities are observed in July, whereas on the contrary, the
values of the ratio kj/uj in these regions are minimum, of the order of 0.05-
0.06. The maximum kj/u^ values (0.10 and slightly higher) are observed in the
foothills, and are of the order of 0.06-0.08 on the remaining territory. The
ki/uj values in different regions of the USSR together with other parameters
are necessary for refining the coefficient characterizing the influence of
meteorological conditions on the dispersal of noxious impurities in the atmos-
phere fioL
-------
Table 1
Bean Value of the Turbulence Coefficient (k-|) for Various Averaging Periods.
Year
1967
1966
-1965
196-1
1963
1962
1961
1960
1959
1958
1957
1956
1955
«
o'
•g
>
ft
•3
.«
•H
Z
0.113
0,122
0,131
0,128
0,139
0,138
0,130
0,140
d)
J3
c
(0
1
o
0.164
0.160
0.179
0,175
0,174
0,172
0,167
0,167
^
1
0
0.251
0,262
0,237
0,234
0,217
0,207
0,203
>
£
{/]
0,210
0,232
0,226
0.236
0,230
0,224
0.235
in
"8
i
o
h
«
a.
0.234
0,164
0,154
0.166
0,155
0,166
§
O
I*
g
»
'0.164
0,177
0,150
0,151
0.157
0.158
'>
A
01
H
0.210
0.191
0,205
0.197
0.191
0,197
•g
c
• H
«H
O
3Z
0.185
0,209
0,205
0,216
0,208
0,203
t
eO
1
0.130
0.148
0,161
0,161
0,172
0.180
•g
«
. -a
>H
0,162
0.160
0.175
0.164
0.158
,
0.166
Si
en
0.175
0,157
0,165
0,182
0.169
1
• H
O.
0,241
0,201
0,216
0.202
0.235
1
t£
0>
t,
0>
CD
0.276
0,235
0,227
0,242
0,229
?
O
g.
•H
C
0
•g
•<
0.161
0.180
0,205
0,226
0,230
0
EH
O.VJ-16
0.207
0,235
0,207
0,209
^
1
K
0.23-5
0.200
0,199
0,201
0.213
°
1
£
0.115
0.136
0.166
0,188
0.189
o .
c
• H
•8
1
o
ft
0.165
0,182
0,178
0,184
0.172
Deviation (#) of the mean value of the turbulence coefficient from the norm
Averaging
Period
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
—19.3
—12.8
-6.4
—8.6
—0,7
—1.4
-7.2
0.0
-1.8
-4.2
7.2
4.8
4,2
3.0
0.0
0.0
23,6
29.1
16.8
15,2
6.9
2.0
0.0
—10.6
1.3
—3.8
0.4
-2,1
—4.7
0,0
41.0
—1.2
—7.2
0.0
-6.6
0.0
5.1
12.0
-5.1
—4,4
—0,6
0.0
6.6
-3.0
4.1
0.0
-3.0
o.o
—8.9
3,0
1.0
6.4
2.5
0,0
—27,8
—17,8
-10.6
—8.9
-4.4
0.0
•
-2,4
-3.6
5.4
-1.2
—4,8
o.o
3.6
-7)1
—2,4
7.7
0.0
2,6
—14,5
-8.1
-14.0
0,0
20,6
2.6
-0.9
5.7
0.0
—30.0
— 2i,8
—10,9
-1.7
0.0
17,7
—1,0
12,4
-1.0
o.o
10.3
—6.1
—6.6
—5,6
o.o
-39,2
-28.0
-12.2
-0.5
0,0
-4,1
5.8
3.5
7.0
0.0
-------
Table 2
Mean Value of the Turbulence Coefficient (k1) for Various Averaging Periods.
Year
1966
1965
1964
1963
1962
1961
1960
1959
1958
1957
1950
1955
1951
Sobakino
0,145
0,159
0,159
0,156
0,143
0.13S
0.132
0,131
0,130
0,130
0,130
0,130
Riga
0,143
0,132
0,126
0,127
0,126
0,123
0,124
0,124
0,128
0,128
0,132
0,135
Nikolayev-
skoye
0,166
0,184
0,186
0,180
0,171
0,173
0,173
0,168
0,165
0,164
0,162
Torzhok
0,136
0,158
0,152
0,143
0,148
0,148
0,151
0,148
0.14S
0,147
0,148
Pavelets
0,138
0,160
0,158
0,161
0,160
0,157
0,156
, 0,151
0,150
. 0,150
0,154
Smolensk ;
0,160
0,170
0,157
0,159
0,161
0,154
0,119
0,149
0.1 -'.7
0,146
Askaniva-
Nova
0,170
0,175
0,174
0,173
0,172
0,171
0,179
0,181
0.1S7
0,190
Kuybjfc.
shev
0,149
0,156
0,156
0,146
0,144
0,146
0,146
0,140
0,146
0,150
Artem
Island
0,196
0,190
0,205
0,197
0,194
0,199
0,207
0,207
0,206
0,205
Solyanka
0,165
0,163
0,151
0,166
0,160
0,157
0,157
0,158
0,165
0,164
Tiyri-
koyya
0,142
0,151
0,139
0,134
0,130
0,130
0,130
0,134
0,139
Kostroma
0,108
0,128
0,133
0,136
0,127
0,121
0.12S
0,193
0,134
Gi«ant
0,140
0,146
0,146
0,14!
0.154
0.15"
0.15S
0,145
0.142
—I
I
deviation
of the mean value of the turbulence coefficient from the
Averaging
Period
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
11,5
22,3
22,3
20,0
10,0
6.2
1.5
0.8
0.0
0,0
0.0
0,0
5,9
—2,2
-6,7
—5,9
—6.7
—8,9
—8,2
—8,2
—5,2
—5,2
-2,2
0,0
2,5
13,6
14,8
11,1
5,6
6,8
6.8
3,7
1,8
1.2
0,0
—8,1
6,8
2,7
—3,4
0,0
0,0
2,0
0,0
0,0
0.7
0,0
—10,4
3,9
2.6
4.6
3.9
2,0
. 1,3
—2,0
—2.6
—2,6
0,0
9,6
16,4
7,5
8,9
10,3
5,5
2,1
2,1
0,7
0,0
—10,5
—7,9
-8,4
—9,0
—9,5
—10,0
—5,8
-4,7
—1.6
0,0
—0,7
' 4,0
4,0
—2,7
—4,0
—2,7
—2,7
—2,7
—2.7
0,0
—4,4
—7,3
0,0
—3,9
-5.4
—0,5
1,0
1,0
0,5
o.o
0.6
—0,6
—7,9
1,2
—2,4
—4.3
—4,3
—3,7
0,6
0,0
2,2
8,6
0,0
—3,6
-6,5
—6,5
—6,5
—3,6
0,0
—19,4
—4,5
—0.7
1,5
—5,2
—9,7
—4,5
—3,0
0.0
—1.4
2.8
2,8
1.4
8,4
11.2
11,2
4.2
0,0
-------
Table 2 (Coot'd)
Year
1966
1965
1964
1963
1962
1961
1960
1959
1958
1957
1956
1955
1954
Beki-
Bent
0,198
0,185
0,167
0,167
0,172
0,171
0,1 S4
0,187
0,190
Tandy
0,221
0,216
0,202
0,222
0,222
0,220
0,229
0,2.36
0,242
Borispol'
0,180
0,182
0,166
0,163
0,165
0,171
0,171
0,168
Poltava
0,162
0,187
0,175
0,167
0,169
0,164
0,166
0,167
Kanennaya
Step'
0,134
0,131
0.128
0,130
0,142
O',147
0.14S
0,162
Beregovo
0,147
0.116
0,129
0,131
0.133
0.132
0,129
0.129
Nolinsk
0,169
0,150
0.150
0.147
0,141
0,138
0,148
0.149
Dushanbe
0,128
0,136
0,129
0.127
0,124
0,126
0,127
0,125
Frunze
0,146
0,163
0,154
0,154
0,154
0,156
0,157
0,157
Yakutsk
0,139
0,157
0.155
0,152
0,153
0,150
0,148
0.148
Fort
Shevch-
enko
0,167
0.16S
0.165
0.178
0.174
0.179
0,177
Vys.
Dubrova
0,136
0,116
0.118
0,115
0,113
0,112
0,107
Kaloykovo
0.195
O.I9S
0,203
0.204
0.202
0,201
0,201
oo
I
deviation (#) of mean value of turbulence coefficient from the norm
Averaging
Period
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
4.2
-2.6
—12,1
—12,1
—9,5
—10,0
-3.2
-lie
0,0
—8,7
—10.8
—16,5
—8,3
-8,3
—9,1
—5,4
—2,5
0.0
7.1
8,3
—1,2
—3,0
—1,8
1,8
1,8
o.o
-3,0
12,0
4,8
o.o
1.2
—1,8
0.6
0,0
-17,3
—17.3
—21,0
—19,8
—12.3
-9,2
—8,6
o.o
14,0
—10,1
0.0
1,6
3,1
2,3
0,0
0,0
13,4
0.7
0,7
—1,3
-5,4
—7.4
-0,7
o.o
2,4
8,8
3.2
1,6
-0,8
0.8
1,6
o.o
-7,0
3.8
-1.9
-1,9
—1,9
—0.6
0,0
0,0
-6.1
6.1
4,7
2.7
3,4
1,4
0.0
0.0
«
—5,6
—5,1
-6,8
0,6
-1,7
1,1
0,0
27.1
8.4
10.3
7.5
5.6
4.7
0,0
—3,0
-1,5
1.0
1,5
0,5
0,0
0,0
-------
Table 3
Mean Values of the Turbulence Coefficient (k^) at a Height of 1 m Calculated by
the Heat Balance Method and kj,/ui Values for \ P.M. in July.
Station
Khibiny
Petrozavodsk
Arkhangelsk
Kargopol1
Ust'Vym'
Voyeykovo
Nikola yevskoye
Tiyrikoyya
Riga
Pinsk
Smolensk
Toropets
Torzhok
Kostroma
Nolinsk
Cheben'ki
Sovetsk
S. I. Nebo]'sin
station
Pavelets
Kamennaya Step1
Borispol1
Poltava
Beregovo
Askaniya-Novh
Nikitskiy sad
G igant
Astrakhan'
Kalmykovo
Ural'sk
Yershov
Kuybyshev
Kushnarenkovo
Rudnyy
TseVinograd
Ogurtsovo
Karasust
Balkhash
Aydarly
Churuk
Fort Shevchenko
Tandy
Beki-Bent
Ak-Molla
Chardzhou
Terraez
Fergana
Dushanbe
Frunze
Telavi
Nakhichevan'
Artem Island
Solyanka
Khakasskaya
Kyzyl
Khomutovo
Chita
Mangut
Skovorodino
ToJstovka
Primorskaya
Yakutsk
Turukhansk
Tura
Oymyakon
Verkhoyansk
*l
M2/seo.
O.M6
0.166
0,196
0,140
0,161
0,210
0,140
0,187
0,169
0,235
0,212
0,180
0,186
0,158
0,203
0,160
0,200
0,180
0,200
0,149
0,194
0,208
0,229
0,230
0.305
0,203
0,224
0,223
0,200
0,200
0,235
0,242
0,213
0,199
0, 162
0.249
0,274
0,216
0,180
0,241
0,209
0,190
0,241
0,201 .
0,211
0,231
0,167
0,196
0,194
0.23K
0,205
0,1«0
0,178
0,1 N8
0,1*9
0,178
0,152
0,172
0,177
0,246
0,166
0,122
0,095
0,135
0,115
*i
«2/sec.
0,149
0,151
0,196
0,158
0,148
0,187
0,192
0,227
0,196
0,168
0,193
0,204
0,239
0,212
0,210
,
0,203
0,214
0,220
0,197
0,158
0,172
0,186
0,206
0,200
0,198
0,180
0,174
0,198
0,153
0,115
*!/«,
M2/sec.
0,002
0,065
0,094
0,070
0,074
0,072
0,056
0,074
0.074
0,103
0,082
0,072
0,071
0.074
0,083
0,050
0,058
0,078
0,080
0,035
0,000
0,075
0,111
0,080
0,179
0,088
0.101
0,004
0,001
0,060
0,108
0,104
0,004
0,054
0,057
0,068
0,005
0,076
'0,055
0,049
0,058'
0,070
0,070
0,087
0,087
0, 196
0,142
0,125
0,104
0,099
0,053
0,079
0,109
0,109
0,096
0,083
0,071
0,090
0,071
0,086
0,080
0,068
0,048
0.079
0,053
Averaging Period
1963, 1966—1967
19G2— 1967
1964, 1960
1904
1906—1967
1967
1900— 1907
1960—1907
1956, 1959. 1901, 1907
1903—1967
1965-1967
1961, 1965-1967
1958, 1905—1967
1956, 1958, 1960—1901,
1963, 1905
1957. 1959, 1961—1962.
1965, 1967
1967
1965-1967
1966-1967
1963, 1905—1967
1957
1958, 1965-1966
1958, 1904, 1900—1967
1959, 1901 — 1964
1956, 1959, 1964, 1966—1967
1960—1907
1 958, 1 960— 1 963, 1 905— 1 967
1958, 1903-1964, 1967
1962—1963, 1966
1967
1900—1907
1955, 1960—1961, 1964—1967
1960-1907
1962—1963, 1965—1967
1905-1966'
1905, 1966.
1966—1967
1905—1907
1904, 1907
1905—1967
1966
1959, 1903, 1965—1967
1966—1907
1965—1966
I960
1966—1907
1904—1967
1959, 1961 — 1967
1904—1967 . •
1902—1906
1906
1907
1960, 1963—1967
1965-1967
1905—1967
1903—1967
1904—1967
1966—1967
* 1962—1965, 1967
1967
1965—1967
1957, 1900, 1902, 1964—1965,
1907
1907
1965 "
1967
1904—1900
-------
Literature Cited
I. B c p ji >i ii A M. E., T c n ii x o 11 n M K. Jl., O ii it K y n V. M. O pac'ieic .•larpn.iiiciiiiti at-
Moc(|icpu ubiOpocaiMii ID MMMOUMX rpyC) j^cKipocTamuiii. Tpynu I'l'O, nun. 158,
106-1.
2. OepJMiiiA M. Fi. n ;ip. Miicncpuoii ;ui<|>(pyjiiH npu iiop-
Majii.iiux n anoMa.nbiiux ytvioniuix CTpaTiKJuiKamiK. TpyAU FFO, uhin. 158, 1064.
3. fopoiiiKo 15. I). llcKUTUpuc ncoCciinocTii paciipocTpanoi.'iin iipeAnux npiiMeceii OT
HIilCOKIIX IICTOMIIIIKOII U n.lllllCIIMOCTII OT CIIIIOIITIIKO-ML'TC'OpOAOril'ICCKIIX (j)aKTOpOU.
Tpy;iu n'O, i,un. L>07, IOCS.
'I. Cnni. KIIII Jl. P., M 11 ji ii K o n /t B. Od (io|).if)OTKc n an;i.iu:ic> ii;i0^io;iennii aa :ia-
rpii.'iiicuiu'M iioi/iyxa n roponax. Tpy;iu M'O, nun. 207, 1!)(>8.
5. Fpa'ioiia B. FI. rcoi'pai|)ii>iccKoe paciipcACJiciini; KOi(|)(|)iiunt;iiTa TypfiyjicimiocTii B npu-
ru-MiiOM c;ioc aT.vioci|)cpi>i ^C-TOM H /uieiiiidc upoMii. Tpy;iui fl'O, uun. 207, 1008.
6. FopoiiiKO b. 15. ii jip. Mcicopoflorii'iccKHp iiafijnoAemui npw HccJiCAOuaiiini npoMuuj-
;ic'iini4x :iarp>i iiii'iiuii npu ic.Miiuro CJIKH uo:i ii;i6jiio,npiniiiM n oiipeACJiciuiio coc'raujiiiiouaix TLMIAO-
uoro Oa.'ianca. rn.li|)OMrTi>oii.i;iaT, Jl., liMM.
0. ApojAou O. A.,-0 p ji o n a B. U., Ill u e p U,. A. K uoiipocy 06 niiTiiMajn,iioii HJM-
TeJii.uocTii in-pi OAU ocpcAiieniiii npn KJiiiMaTujioni'iccKiix iiccJieAOuainiHx. TpyAU
Pro. uun. 181, 1068.
10. VKanaiuoi no p«c
-------
PHYSICAL PRINCIPLES OF CALCULATION OF DISPERSAL OF
INDUSTRIAL DISCHARGES IN THE ATMOSPHERE
M. Ye. Berlyand and R. I. Onikul
From Trudy, Glavnaya Geofiz. Observat. im. A. I. Voeykova, No. 234,
p. 3-27, (1968).
1. Introduction
One of the chief applications of studies of atmospheric diffusion is
the calculation of dispersal of industrial discharges in the atmosphere.
Studies along these lines have laid the basis for the consideration of
meteorological conditions in the design and operation of enterprises dis-
charging noxious substances into the atmosphere, and for determining the
permissible discharge and the height of smokestacks at which the required
air purity is ensured in the surrounding area.
To date, many studies have been published dealing with atmospheric
diffusion and related investigations of turbulent exchange. In the
Soviet Union, the most extensive studies have been conducted at the
A. I. Voeykov Main Geophysical Observatory (GGO), the Atmospheric Physics
Institute, the Applied Geophysics Institute, the Leningrad Hydrometeorolog-
ical Institute, and others. Numerous studies have been made in England,
the U.S.A., Japan, and other countries. A number of books and special
papers [5, 6, 34, 51 etc.] have been devoted to a review of the results
ob tained.
The results of the completed studies have found practical applica-
tions comparatively recently. The first attempts to adjust the discharges
Into the atmosphere to certain meteorological characteristics were under-
taken 20-30 years ago. In 1936, Bosanquet and Pearson [46] and in 1947
Sutton [52], who used his 1932 studies, proposed working formulas for de-
termining the surface concentration of an impurity from high sources. As
a result of the rapid development of industry and the associated increase
in air pollution, the results of these calculations, particularly Button's
formulas, were rapidly adopted in many countries. Interest In them grew
with the start of construction of atomic reactors and the consequent need
to evaluate possible air pollution by radioactive substances. From then
on, studies dealing with the experimental verification of the working
formulas and their further theoretical generalization expanded considerably.
In the Soviet Union, among the first studies dealing with the calcula-
tion of dispersal of industrial discharges were those carried out by G. V.
Sheleykhovskiy [44], N. V. Dergachev [27] and P. I. Andreyev [1], who used
Button's formula or similar relations.
The experimental studies performed showed that the indicated working
formulas reflect, mainly in a qualitative manner, some characteristics of
-------
the propagation of impurities in the atmosphere. However, in a quantita-
tive sense, there are considerable discrepancies between the observed and
the calculated data. This has led to the introduction of correction coef-
ficients into the working formulas and to the development of other empir-
ical and theoretical relations. The studies of Pasquill [51], Mead [49],
Hawkins and Nonhebel [50], Wipperman [53], Cramer [48], etc. have received
considerable attention. They are essentially based on relations of the
type of Button or Bosanquet-Pearson formulas. Part of these studies give
a more detailed representation of the dependence of the parameters con-
tained in the formulas on the meteorological conditions. In the practical
calculation of impurity concentrations from industrial sources, it becomes
necessary to consider the initial ascent as well. A considerable number
of methods also have been proposed for calculating this ascent.
As a result, a large number of highly diversified working formulas
are now available. However, very few methods of calculation are known
which have been sufficiently approved and recommended for broad applica-
tions as standard documents in various countries. Among such documents
can be included the Handbook of the German Engineering Society, Mead's
method recommended to the World Meteorological Organization for calculating
the dispersal of discharges from atomic reactors, etc. In the USSR, the
first standard document of this kind was the work [19], officially ratified
in 1963 and now generally used in the design of electric power plants. A
distinctive feature of this method is its theoretical soundness and extens-
ive experimental validation. To date, considerable experience has been accum-
ulated on the application of the method in the USSR; it has attracted the
attention of experts and found acceptance in countries of S.E.V. Council of
Economic Mutual Assistance, Yugoslovia, France, Japan and elsewhere.
The problem has naturally arisen of generalizing the given method and
extending it to a broader category of industrial enterprises. Heat and
power stations are in the category of large sources characterized by heavy
discharges of sulfur dioxide and ash, and also by a substantial overheating
of the stack gases relative to the surroundings. The discharges are ejected
from relatively high stacks located close to each other, and, in practice,
an electric power plant may be treated as a single source. To generalize
the method, it was necessary to study the conditions of dispersal of impuri-
ties in the atmosphere over a wider range of variation of stack heights and
volumes and temperatures of discharges, in the presence of differences in
the parameters of the individual sources, their scatter, etc.
Given below are some results of studies along these lines, forming the
basis of the "Recommendations on the Calculation of the Dispersal in the
Atmosphere of Noxious Substances (Dust and Sulfur Dioxide) Contained in
Discharges of Industrial Enterprises" [43], ratified in 1967 by the USSR
Office of State Construction, section of construction standards and regula-
tions (SN 369-67).
2. Initial Assumptions
In the last few years, the Main Geophysical Observatory has carried
out an extensive group of theoretical studies on the atmospheric diffusion
-------
of impurities from industrial sources [9, 12, etc.]- The characteristics
of the propagation of an impurity were studied on the basis of the solution
of the turbulent diffusion equation •
/
da , dq d ,
-
Axis x is parallel to the wind, axis y is perpendicular to it in the hori-
zontal plane, axis z is oriented along the vertical, q is the impurity con-
centration, u is the wind velocity, w is the velocity of ordered displace-
ment of the impurity along the vertical , and kz and ky are the vertical and
horizontal components of the exchange coefficient.
The initial condition (for x = 0) taken was the presence of a point
source of impurity at height z = H, and the boundary conditions taken were
the absence of turbulent flow of the impurity on the underlying surface
(or the complete absorption of the impurity in the case of a water surface)
and a decrease of the concentration to zero at a sufficiently large distance
from the source. The thickness of the air layer in which the dispersal of
the impurity from major industrial enterprises takes place is very large.
In such a layer, the variation of the wind velocity and components of the
exchange coefficient with the height is frequently complex in character.
For this reason, a sufficiently general solution of equation (1) with the
indicated boundary conditions may be obtained only by numerical methods.
In addition, it is first necessary to carry out the possible simplifica-
tions of the problem, primarily, in accord with the available data and con-
cepts of the parameters and physical mechanisms of the processes studied.
In this connection, it is essential to use the results of [2], accord-
ing to which the horizontal component of the exchange coefficient ky changes
with the height in proportion to the wind velocity, i.e., ky • kgu. In this
case ^
q(x, yt z) = yL&Le-u* .
The quantity q' (x,z) satisfies the equation
and the initial condition of the presence of a linear source at height
z • H. In addition, the same boundary conditions are preserved for q1 as
for q.
For certain models of the variation of u and k with height, equations
(1) and (3) were solved analytically [2, 20, 30, 33, etc.]. In [7, 10, 11,
12, etc.], a numerical solution of this problem was obtained. The terms of
equation (3) were approximated by finite differences, and the equation thus
transformed was solved by means of the difference factorization method,
using computers.
-------
In assigning the meteorological parameters u and kz contained in
(1), one must differentiate between normal weather conditions, observed
relatively frequently, and abnormal conditions, encountered less frequent-
ly but of substantial Interest, particularly in cases where they may lead
to heavy atmospheric pollution.
Under normal conditions above a relatively flat area, the wind velocity
u changes with the height in an approximately logarithmic manner, and the
exchange coefficient k increases linearly with the height in the ground
layer of air and remains approximately constant in the superjacent layer.
(4)
. , // ^ ,
v -f- K\ — npH 2 > h.
Here u^ and k, are values of u and k for z • Zi (usually z-j «• 1m), ZQ is
the roughness of the underlying surface, v is the coefficient of molecular
diffusion for air, and h is the height of the ground layer. As was shown
in [10], the consideration of small deviations of u and kz from (4) is non-
essential. In the case of considerable deviations which may take place
under abnormal conditions, the solution of the problems by numerical methods
proves to be particularly effective.
Usually, the diffusion of a light impurity (w*0) and that of a heavy
Impurity having a definite settling rate are studied separately.
Let us examine the general methods of calculating the parameters of the
problem. For a given type of dependence of u and kz on z, the calculations
may be carried out for definite values of u^ and ki, and the change to other
values of these quantities can be achieved on the basis of similarity con-
siderations. Indeed, if ZQ and h are fixed and one considers that substan-
tial changes in v have little effect on the results [10], the following
relation is valid for the concentration of a light'impurity:
where M is the capacity of the source.
Thus, it is sufficient to determine the "standard" function $n in numer-
ical calculations of Increased accuracy for only one pair of values ui and ki
for different H values. Further calculations of the concentration are made
on the basis of (5), as is done in the presence of an analytical solution of
the problem.
To evaluate the pollution of the ground layer of air, the surface con-
centration (-z - 0) is usually employed. Of special practical importance is
the determination of qm, the maximum surface concentration, reached at some
distance xm when y = 0. The structure of formula (5) indicates that the max-
imum on the function q for y = z • 0 depends only on H. Thus,
(6)
-------
and
Calculations performed in [9] and recently indicate that the functions
and i(H) are adequately approximated by a power function, i.e.,
and
where C^, 8^ (i " 1» 2) are constants that, as was shown by the calculations,
depend relatively little on h and ZQ. For h » 100 m and ZQ « 0.01 m,
, 82*0.2.
In the case of a heavy impurity for constant values of w, from an
analysis of equation (1) and the initial condition at x » 0, similarly to
(5) and (6) , we obtain
a «JL1/JEI «]>,(.*>£. JL // -4-fc (10)
•»• •«, K .*o«i -I "i ' *i ' '
and for the maximum surface concentration
If as was done in [11], the factor l/H^l is separated in ij^, as in (8),
formula (11) may be transformed to the form
where q is defined by formula (6), and xm is some function that is found
from the results of the calculation.
Similarly we can write that
/71t£f li T2 I * h I \ J- ••*/
or
7,, w \
*««—^(tf.-jj-J, $14)
where
-------
According to (11), in the range of w values from 0 to 0.25 in/sec and
H values from 100 to 250 m, xm changes from 1 to 2-2.5 and depends on h.
Recently, additional calculations were made for a wider range of variation
of the initial parameters. It turns .out that as w increases, Xm. increases
approximately in proportion to w, and the proportionality coefficient is a
complex function of H. In analyzing the relationships obtained, it is use-
ful to make use of simpler cases admitting an analytical solution of the
problem. Thus, N. Ye. Berlyand's results [2] for a light impurity may be
compared with those of L. S. Gandin and R. E. Soloveychik [20] for a heavy
impurity. In these results, consideration is given to the case where the
exchange coefficient increases indefinitely with the height according to
the linear law (k - k-^z) for u - u^zn. In this case it turns out that
Xp, * Xm (TT-) » i«e., xm *8 independent of H. When the components of the ex-
change coefficient ky, kz and the wind velocity u take constant values, the
surface concentration of the heavy impurity on axis x from the source at
height H (with the condition for z - 0: k dq *, o) is given by the formula
dz
2/M
(15)
where
r (a) = e"' eric (o); o
4kzx wf-f
°1 ,,W2 ' °2 ZIT"
According to (15), the concentration maximum q,
ally. Fig. 1 shows the dependence x
m
on
is determined numeric-
is evident from this
wH
figure, Xm. increases in approximately linear fashion with ^2 = over a
4&j
wide range of variation of the parameters.
%-m
S
*
3
2
1
0
3af
Fig. 1.
When a model for kz with a "break" is used, according to which kz = k,h
for z>h, the analog of (Jo is the parameter wH^ Data of calculations for
relatively small H values at which the "break" of kz does not play a substan-
tial part, confirm that Xm depends little on H, and for greater heights xm
increases with H. At sufficiently large H (400-500 m) and w (0.2-0.3 m/sec),
X™ reaches 4-5.
-------
The concentration q of both the light and heavy impurity obtained by
solving equation (1), which pertains to a steady state, is formally inde-
pendent of time. However, q is indirectly a function of time, since the
coefficients contained in (1) are time-dependent. As was shown in [12],
the values of the components of the exchange coefficient kz and k are de-
termined by the action of turbulent eddies of comparatively small size with
a characteristic time T usually of the order of 2-3 min. If the time T to
which the concentrations studied are referred is much greater than T, one
should take into consideration the action of larger eddies, which cause
fluctuations of the wind direction averaged over the interval T. Within
the framework of the above scheme, ky and k being kept constant in time,
this effect may be taken into account by determining the average concentra-
tion q for the time period T.
On the basis of the above dependence of q on y (5) according to [9 and
12 ]
(y coa f — A" sin V)'J
Here U)() is the probability of deviation of the wind direction by
angle 4>, and in accordance with the observational data
Vt_
'
where 4>g is the dispersion of the wind direction averaged over time T, in
the course of time T.
For sufficiently large x values it was found in [9] that
le~W (17)
Taking (5) into account, we find that
*f-,", *)• <18>
It should be noted that q in the case of large x values is independent
of kg, and the effect of horizontal dispersal shows up in (18) only via the
dispersion of the wind direction g.
For other x values, a more accurate expression for q is given in [9 and
12].
The formulas obtained permit one to evaluate the dependence of the im-
purity concentration on the sample intake time t in cases involving an ex-
perimental determination of the concentration. To this end, the time t
should be included in the indicated averaging period T, and one should also
-------
allow for the duration of the transport of the impurity from the sources
to the point of observation at a distance x« One can approximately set
x _
7=3/_j-__) where u is the average transport velocity.
u
The time interval T and hence the time of sample Intake t determine
first of all the dispersion of the_ wind direction $()• As T increases,
(|>Q rises, and the concentration q decreases. At small T values these
changes show up more clearly, and at large T values they slow down. The
dependence of <(>Q on T and on the interior average interval T and also on
the meteorological conditions is described in [21].
In accordance with (18) and with the use of power approximations simi-
lar to those contained in formulas (8) and (9) , the maximum concentration
qm and distance x^ at which it is reached are given by the formulas
Mk\ 1
"
o \
"'
"1
The quantity 33 amounts to about 2.3-2.5, and 34 is approximately
equal to 32 •
In determining q|y.g for x^=xm it is expedient to make use of the
fact that according to the calculations, q is approximately dependent on
-4- only [10]. 7m
If long periods of time T*, including periods of many years, are
studied, the probability of the wind direction fl(a) at angle a (measured
clockwise from the north-south direction) is determined by large-scale^
eddies and usually characterized by the wind rose. The concentration q
average for the period T* at a stationary observation point is then defined
by the relation ' «
Here q is the concentration q calculated according to (17) and averaged
for different wind directions over the values of the wind velocity u, and
exchange coefficient k,.
It follows from (17) that q is different from zero in a comparatively
small angular sector within which one can assume that fi(a) - J2a - const.
Then
-------
By <)>Q is meant the average value of this parameter for the given wind
direction.
Comparison of (22) and (18) shows that the average concentration is
independent of the parameters of horizontal diffusion <)>Q and kg.
If P is the frequency of the winds in the direction of a given rhumb
(in fractions of unity), or a total number of rhumbs n, and PQ = _ is the
frequency of winds of one rhumb for a circular wind rose, then n
P
o
_P__
PU
(23)
The stack and flue gases coining from the chimneys have a definite exit
velocity. In addition, they frequently possess buoyancy, since their initial
temperature is higher than that of the surrounding air. Thus, in the vicin-
ity of the discharge source there is created a field of vertical velocities
that occasionally extends over large distances, these velocities decreasing
with the distance from the source, which promotes the ascent of the impurity.
The problem therefore arises of finding the field of displacement velocities
of air near the source in order to allow for it in solving equation (1).
Because of the complexity of this problem, due to. the nonlinearity of the
equations describing the propagation of the overheated jet in the driving
stream, it is usually solved with considerable simplifying assumptions. The
initial ascent of the impurity is considered for the most part in the absence
of the horizontal wind velocity and with some other assumptions. It is
assumed that at a certain height above the stack the vertical velocities are
low, and as was mentioned above, the concept of an effective ascent of the
smoke jet AH above the mouths of the stacks is introduced.
The paper [12] points to the drawbacks of such an approach and formu-
lates a more general statement of the problem for an overheated jet in a
driving turbulent flow. Here the propagation of the impurity along axis y
is approximately described by a relation of type (2), and the determination
of the horizontal and vertical velocity components u and w is done by solv-
ing the following system of equations:
equation of motion
equation of heat influx
fix ~"~ dz dz * dz ' •
equation of continuity
du . i)"jy r\ f 2 4 ^
dx Oz
for suitable boundary conditions. Here i) is the difference between the
-------
temperature of the jet and that of the surrounding air, T is the temperature
of the surrounding air (°K), and g is the acceleration due to gravity.
The solution of system (24) together with diffusion equation (1) is
carried out numerically according to the scheme given in [12].
The paper [9] gives a formula for calculating AH, approximately ob-
tained from theoretical considerations
A//-1,5 ^(2,5+ 3,3^), (25)
where u is the wind velocity at the height of the vane, WQ is the initial
exit velocity of the gases, and AT is the difference between the temperature
of the exiting gases and that of the atmosphere at the level of the stack
orifice.
The quantity q-m substantially depends on the meteorological conditions,
according to the parameters contained in (19) and (25). Of particular impor-
tance is the dependence of T on the wind velocity u. On the one hand, at
a fixed height of the source, qm increases with decreasing wind velocity at
height Zi" 1 m (the transition from ui to u at the vane height zv is achieved
in accordance with (4)). On the other hand, as the wind velocity u decreases
at sufficiently small values of u, the effective source height He » H + AH
increases rapidly by virtue of (25). Therefore, each case has some "unsafe"
wind velocity UM at which the highest concentration ~qm. is reached. The value
of Ujj is determined from the condition
d(/m A oe.\
—i^i-= U. \*o/
In the general case, when analyzing the influence of the wind velocity
u on qm it is also necessary to consider the dependence on u of the coeffic-
ients contained in (19), in particular, the quantity ^i . It is known ([15]
etc.) that_.i_ depends on the number B =—j-, where 6T is the temperature
Ui ' Ui
difference at two levels in the ground layer of air (usually 0.5 and 2 m).
The quantity $Q also depends on B [21]. In the case of unstable stratifi-
cation (6T>0), _fet_ and 6Q increase with B; in a stable stratification (6T<0),
«i
decreases with Increasing absolute value of B, while 4>0 has a tendency
to increase. The values of Q reach a certain minimum under close to equi-
librium conditions. Thus, the ratio ^ decreases with a reinforcement of
stability in the presence of a stable inversion stratification and, in gen-
eral, is less than in an unstable state of the atmosphere. Consequently,
other things being equal, the impurity concentration (by virtue of its pro-
portionality to _&i \rLn a superadiabatic temperature gradient is greater
'
-------
than in an inversion gradient.
In an unstable stratification, excluding the case of slight winds
(up to 1-2 m/sec) , the quantity __*'... depends relatively little on the wind
velocity u and increases slightly with increasing B. It may be approxi-
mately assumeri that _.^i_ is independent of u, . Taking this assumption into
account and assuming that B^ • 2.3 and 6 A " 0.2, we can obtain the follow-
ing equation for UM from (19), (25) and (26) :
(27)
where for convenience of presentation, the following notation has been in-
troduced: .
#2 AT"
Here D =» 2Rrt is the diameter of the stack orifice and Vi =
.. 0 4
volume of the gases exiting from the stack.
From the solution of equation (27) it follows that
(28)
is the
then
A',,
where
0,65 IK-
0,
M
(29)
(30)
(31)
0,30
0,170?
(32)
For thie case in which the wind velocity u ^ u , for the highest con-
centration q and distance xmu at which it is reached, the following form
^mu
ulas can be written down on the basis of (19), (25) and (29):
?,««. =
-------
The use of numerical methods of solution of the problem made it possi-
ble to study the above- indicated anomalous conditions and also the problem
of propagation of the impurity over a dissected topography. These results
have been presented in sufficient detail in [10, 12, 13, and 14], and we
shall consider below only some conclusions of practical importance.
3. Practical Recommendations
In designing industrial enterprises it is important to determine the
highest possible impurity concentration, since, in order to meet the sani-
tary requirements, it must not exceed the permissible value. In order to
find this value (excluding anomalous conditions, which will be discussed
later), in (30) it is necessary to take &i for unfavorable meteorological
conditions, in particular, for an unsafe wind velocity and stratification
for which ~ i will reach the highest value q«.
">l «
M
The working formula for determining the highest concentration q^ can
be given in the following form:
AMmF
where
The coefficient m is determined from the graph of Fig. 2; it is normal-
ized so that for f • fg » 0.42 m/sec2 deg, m = 1. The adopted value of fg
corresponds to the frequently occurring discharge parameters H, Wg, D and
AT for major industrial and power facilities (for example, H - 120 m, D • 6 m,
wg - 10 m/sec, AT « 100°).
The coefficient F determines the influence of the settling rate of a
heavy impurity and is found via the function xm» allowing for the density and
the characteristic particle size distribution. The distributions of the dis-
persity of the dust and ash may be quite different. They depend on the
efficiency and type of the dust and ash catchers. The estimates performed
showed that for practical calculations one can approximately assume F = 2 if
the efficiency of the purification is above 90%, and F » 2.5 for a lower de-
gree of purification. These values pertain to cases where wH does not exceed
100 nr/sec, i.e., for average settling rates of the particles they apply to
stacks whose height does not exceed 250-300 m. At higher settling rates of
the particles, this condition may fail to be fulfilled for lower stacks as
well. The quantity w increases with the size and density of the dust parti-
cles. It should be kept in mind that as a rule, the density of the dust is
below the density of the substance of which it is constituted, since the
structure of dust particles frequently consists of loose conglomerates. Their
density is usually close to 1 g/cm3, but in some cases reaches 3-4 g/cm3 and
more.
-------
The coefficient A is taken for unfavorable meteorological conditions
usually observed in the daytime in summer in the presence of a highly de-
veloped turbulent exchange.
The value of the parameter a entering into the coefficient A depends
to some extent on the roughness of the underlying surface ZQ and on the
height of the ground layer h; the latter is taken such that qM reaches its
highest values [9]. For a medium roughness for the conditions of a flat
area, a is approximately equal to 0.3.
o,Q-
Sf m/seo deg
Fig. 2.
According to the observations in the area of the Shchekino State
Regional Electric Power Plant (SREPP) , on the average, A = 120 if it is
assumed in (34) that q is expressed in mg/m^, M in g/sec, N in m, v in
m^/sec, and AT in °C. This value of A may be assigned to areas with a
flat or moderately dissected topography in the central part of the European
territory of the USSR and in other regions with similar climatic conditions.
As was noted in [9], it may be postulated that in the southern regions of the
USSR and in forested regions characterized by a marked vertical turbulent
exchange in the atmosphere, A amounts to approximately 200.
In regions where the conditions of turbulent exchange are intermediate
in character, A is taken equal to 160. Expeditionary studies carried out in
the vicinity of the Suvorovo and Moldavian SREPP in Leningrad, Cherkassy,
Krasnoyarsk, Balakovo, and other regions confirmed the validity of these re-
sults. In determining the coefficients A, data on the distribution of the
rate of turbulent exchange over the territory in the daytime in summer were
used [26]. It was assumed that in regions with high average values of &i
(which correspond to large average B) , the average concentrations of noxious
substances would increase in accordance with formulas (18) and (23). The
values of the coefficients A for different regions of the USSR are given in
[43].
According to (29) , the unsafe velocity UM is found approximately from
the formula
(36)
-------
The distance x» at which the maximum concentration qM is attained is
determined in accordance with formula (31) by selecting tne parameters it
contains for unfavorable conditions. The calculations show that, basically,
Xvj - (20-25) H. In addition, the ratio_*M_depends to some extent on H, it
//
is smaller for low stacks and greater for high ones.
The ratio _fiLalso de-
H
pends to some extent on the quantity —L, determined at the unsafe wind
Ml
velocity
creases,
and for conditions of highly developed turbulence. As UM de-
usual ly increases, and therefore -fiLwill be somewhat less, but
for practical purposes a detailed calculation of x^ is not necessary and it
is sufficient to confine oneself to the approximate relation
xu»2Qtf. (37)
It should be kept in mind that concentrations of noxious substances
differing from the maximum concentration q^ by no more than 30% are ob-
served at distances of (10-40) H.
From formulas (33), allowing for (36) and the above-mentioned depend-
ence of the meteorological parameters on the wind velocity under unsafe
conditions, we shall obtain formulas for the highest concentration q^u with
u unequal to UM and for the distance xjju at which this concentration is
reached,
-a r- jf ~jc n (38)
The quantities r and p depend chiefly on u t which permits the plot-
ting of convenient working graphs (Fig. 3). The graph for r shows that the
dependence of the concentration maximum q« on the wind velocity u is asym-
metrical in character. For uUM» tne decrease of q^ is slower. Analysis of the variation of the coef-
ficient p shows that, at wind velocities u substantially lower than UM, the
maximum concentrations qjju are observed at distances several times greater
than x^ = 20 H. At wind velocities u much greater than ujj, the quantities
-------
Calculations performed in [10] showed that for the usual effective
source heights (excepting the cases of slight winds) one can approximately
assume ^ to be a function of _£__, and <1 to be a function of __£_ . It
-------
chambers where the concentrations are determined at which, independently
of the time spent by animals in the chamber, the investigated impurities
have no appreciable effect on them.
The above formulas (with the indicated values of coefficient A) are
used to determine the single concentrations that should be compared with
MPC8 and with the single concentrations obtained from observations. When
it is necessary to calculate single concentrations for shorter time inter
vals, the above-mentioned methods [9, 12] can be used.
To use MPCj, two alternatives are possible. In the first, the calcu-
lation is made only for cases of wind directions that are very stable in
the course of 24 hours or longer. In so doing, it is necessary to antici-
pate a set of measures such that the calculated concentrations do not ex-
ceed MPCj. In this case, the average daily concentrations will be closest
to the single concentrations, but such conditions are observed very seldom
and their discussion is of no practical significance.
It is more logical to relate the concept of mean daily MFC to a
regime established in the course of a period of many years. In this case,
the name "mean daily MFC" has an arbitrary meaning. Accordingly, the cal-
culated concentration should be determined for points that are fixed in
the area, allowing for the climatological data on the atmospheric diffusion
parameters - the wind velocity and direction and the coefficient of verti-
cal turbulent exchange. It will be shown that at the present time such an
approach involves a definite contradiction between the recommended values
of single and average daily MFC's. Indeed, we s_hall use the relation (23)
obtained above between the single concentration q_and average concentration
q. For the evaluations we shall assume that q « q and that the wind rose
is circular, i.e. . P - 1. Then " _ _jPo 7 For <£n = 0.1, we have ~ ,
"•"— — ij — — i^"n~ */ • *J cj i
/>«, V2;i "^~o7
q 25
If we consider that the unsafe wind velocities and the intense turbulent
exchange are not observed during the entire period, the averaging should
be carried out over the possible values of the wind velocity and exchange
coefficient, i.e., it should be assumed that q is always less than "q ^ and "°q
Q
is less than — . According to the experimental data of Chamberlain [47] and
some other authors, -^. » Therefore, in order to obtain consistent re-
q 40
suits in determining the permissible discharge, the necessary stack height,
etc. when calculated data are used, the ratio MP^s should also be no less
MPCd
than 1 - -i. In the tables for MFC [36], the ratio Mpcs ranges mainly from
25 40 5^
-i to 1. For this reason, the requirement q^ < MPC8 turns out to be a con-
siderably stricter condition than the requirement that the average concen-
tration for many years be less than MFC,.
-------
Taking the planning experience into account, one must admit that the
use of single concentrations in the calculations permits the achievement
of the necessary atmospheric purity in more real terms. Therefore, it
appears necessary at the present time to use single concentrations as the
base. Thus, in designing and operating industrial enterprises the follow
ing condition should be fulfilled
' <7«< MPC_ (41)
O
It then follows from formula (34) that the minimum stack height of a
single source is given by
Since m depends on f and f on H, calculations using formula (42) should be
carried out by successive approximations, setting first m ° 1. Two to
three approximations are usually sufficient.
Let us now consider the case of a group of sources, when the calcula-
tion is made on the basis of a superposition of concentration fields from
individual sources. Analysis of the above formulas indicates that if the
distance between the stacks does not exceed their average height by a fac-
tor of more than 3-4, the sources may be treated as being located at a
single point. If at the same time the discharge is distributed uniformly
among N stacks of identical height and diameter, the total concentration will
be given by the formula
AMmF -,Y~N~
1u — fji y y w • (43)
where M is the total discharge from all the stacks and V = --- - — is the
4
total volume of stack gases.
Accordingly, it follows from (36) that
(44)
For sources with different unsafe wind velocities, the calculations are
simplified if one introduces into the discussion the weighted-mean unsafe
wind velocity
(45)
tul
l-l
where v^. and qMi are the values of the unsafe velocity and highest concen-
tration for the i-th source, and N is the total number of sources.
The calculations performed showed that in this case it is practically
sufficient at first to determine for each source the highest concentration
^Mu an<^ distance xMu at which this concentration is reached at a wind velocity
-------
u » uj^. Then, if the sources are located close to each other or are
grouped along a certain line, the distribution of concentration from the
sum of the sources is found by graphical summation. The highest concen-
tration value taken is q^, and the distance from some arbitrary origin of
coordinates is taken as XM.
In the general case, when the sources cannot be reduced to a point
or a straight line, one has to sum up the fields of the concentration from
individual sources by considering its distribution both along the wind and
in the direction at right angles to the wind. Obviously, the different
wind directions must be considered, since the relative position of the
sources changes as a function of these directions, and the concentrations
produced by the latter add up in different ways. It is understandable that
such calculations become very cumbersome even for a relatively small number
of sources. They can be simplified because the concentrations perpendicu-
lar to the wind direction decrease much faster than those in the direction
parallel to the wind. Experience with the calculations showed that in order
to determine the highest total concentration it is sufficient to consider
only those directions that .pass through pairs of main sources. At the same
time, in each direction it is first necessary to carry out the calculations
at points corresponding to the maxima of concentrations from the largest
sources. A program for the "Ural-4" computer was written for a large num-
ber of sources in accordance with the scheme presented above. According to
the program, the print-out consists of the maximum total concentration with
the characteristics of the conditions under which it is observed, and also
the contribution of individual sources to this maximum. The availability of
such a program considerably simplifies the selection of the most effective
variants of arrangement of the sources and their parameters in planning
major facilities, permits plotting of the total fields of concentrations
for all of the sources in a city, etc.
In planning new enterprises discharging noxious impurities in areas
where the air is already polluted by the same substances from other indus-
trial enterprises, and also in expanding the operating enterprises, in addi-
tion to the increase of discharges into the atmosphere, the initial or back-
ground concentration q^ should be taken into consideration. In this case,
the sum q^ + q^ should not exceed the MFC. The background concentration q^
can be determined by means of the above methods of calculation for a group
of sources.
An important problem in the practical application of the results pre-
sented above is the determination of the boundaries of the sanitary protec-
tive zone (SPZ), i.e., the allowed difference between enterprises discharg-
ing noxious substances into the atmosphere and residential areas. Thus far,
the problem of the SPZ has essentially been solved empirically. On the
basis of the experience of sanitation surveys, a model classification of
Industrial facilities has been established for the size and the required gap
between the enterprises and residential districts [37]. The data on which
this classification is based mostly fail to reflect the modern tendency to
discharge the bulk of noxious substances through high smokestacks and air
-------
ducts. Analysis shows that this classification considers chiefly the
pollution of areas close to the enterprises, which is caused by random
discharges (i.e., outside stacks). Therefore, the width 1Q of a sanitary
protective zone (SPZ) which has now been established is useful when, accord-
ing to the calculations, the concentration q^ from orderly discharges is
less than the MFC, since the method discussed above does not allow for ran-
dom discharges. However, the width of the SPZ for different classes of
enterprises was established primarily for conditions when there is no marked
prevalence of winds of definite directions. Under conditions where the mean
annual wind rose differs substantially from circular, namely, for a frequency
P of winds of certain directions which is greater than the mean value PQ, the
width of the SPZ should be corrected by taking into account the characteris-
tics of the wind regime of the area under consideration. For these wind
directions, taking into account the above dependence of the average concen-
tration on the frequency of the wind direction P [23], the width of the gap 1
from the enterprises to the outer limits of the SPZ is given by the formula
/ _/ p
l~—l°~f^' (46)
and in the directions for which the wind frequency P^Q, 1 = IQ should be
taken.
In cases where, on the basis of calculations in accordance with the
above scheme, q>MPC up to a distance LQ exceeding IQ, the distance 1 from
the pollution source to the outer limits of the SPZ should be greater than
IQ. To calculate the distance 1 it is necessary to consider the character-
istics of the distribution of average concentrations in accordance with formu-
la (23). In addition, it is necessary to take into account the study of the
nature of the decrease of single concentrations with the distance x for
x>xjij (cf . , for example, Fig. 4). It follows from Fig. 4 that at these dis-
tances, as x increases, the concentration q decreases in approximately in-
verse proportion to x. Including in the sanitary protective zone a terri-
tory with approximately the same average concentrations, one can roughly
assume that
t^Lo-fr- nP» P>f>o (47)
in the directions for which P
-------
discharges because of the limitation of their initial ascent [4]. Under
these conditions, the effective ascent AH cannot exceed a definite limit
independently of the decrease of the wind velocity u, the values of the
unsafe velocity decrease, and the surface concentrations rise sharply.
Despite a marked influence of elevated inversions on the distribution of
the impurity concentrations, it should be kept in mind that in many geo-
graphical areas they are observed for a comparatively short period of
time. For this reason, it was proposed above that the stack height and
other discharge parameters be determined from relatively frequent unsafe
weather conditions. During periods of elevated inversions, however, par-
ticularly when a thick inversion of several hundred meters with average
temperature gradients of approximately 3-4° per 100 m is located above
the stacks, and the wind is directed from the sources of pollution toward
residential areas, a relatively short term decrease of the output of the
enterprises should be recommended in order to reduce the discharges into
the atmosphere. This is economically more expedient than a sharp increase
of the stack height during construction. In some cases it is also neces-
sary to consider possible deviations in the vertical profile of the wind
from the logarithmic distribution. Calculations made in [12] have shown
that the presence of still layers around the underlying surface, provided
there is a well developed turbulence (convection), may also lead to a con-
siderable increase (double or more) of the surface concentrations, this
increase being greater the thicker these layers are.
The propagation of the concentration from the source in the presence
of a fog changes substantially. The important effect of the increase of
the surface concentrations in this case was pointed out in [13]. It turns
out that in addition to a redistribution of the impurities because of
their absorption from the air by droplets, in the fog layer the concen-
trations Increase because of an additional transport of the impurities
from layers of air located above the fog. As sulfur dioxide and some other
ingredients dissolve in the fog, their toxicity increases. It should also
be noted that fogs are frequently associated with inversion and still
conditions that may cause a mutual reinforcement of dangerous effects.
Under dissected topography conditions, air movements arise that result
in substantial concentration changes. According to theoretical studies
[12, 14], it turns out that under such conditions, the concentration maxi-
mum is higher than on a flat topography. For a height of irregularities
of 50-100 m with a slope angle of about 5-6°, the difference in the concen-
tration maxima, depending on the location of the source in different forms
of the relief, amounts to 50% or more. An increase o,f the concentration
is sometimes observed even when the stacks are located in high areas, in
the vicinity of leeward slopes, since here the wind velocities decrease and
descending currents arise. On the other hand, in the case of gentle slopes
of the relief (the slope angles for the most part do not exceed a few
degrees), the air flow around them is practically complete and the increase
of the concentration is slight. The influence of a hilly relief on the dis-
tribution of concentration manifests itself in areas where the wind velocity
changes appreciably at a fixed height. In this connection, a major impor-
tance is assumed by a microclimatic study of the area, analogous to the one
-------
discussed in [31, 39]. Considerable possibilities are offered by experi-
mental work involving wind tunnel simulation of air streams in complex
forms of the relief, under urban conditions, etc. [23, 29].
4. Experimental Verification
The above conclusions from theoretical investigations have been con-
firmed with extensive experimental material.
One of the first most complete sets of experimental studies of
atmospheric pollution by industrial discharges was completed in the region
of the Shchekino SREPP. The work was done in 1962-1965 during periods in
different seasons of the year and covering a broad range of variations in
meteorological conditions. Results of a comparison of the calculated and
experimental data obtained were given in [9; 25, 35]. They were shown to
agree within 20-30% in terms of the concentrations q^ and character of the
dependence of the highest concentrations q on the distances to the source x
and on the wind velocities u. The observations confirmed the calculated
values of the unsafe wind velocity, which amounts to about 5 m/sec, the
general character of the dependence of pollution on the stability of the
ground layers of the atmosphere, and also the validity of formula (25) for
the magnitude of the initial ascent of the smoke plume.
Similar expeditionary studies by the Main Geophysical Observatory in
cooperation with the Moscow Scientific Research Institute of Hygiene and
other organizations were carried out during the summer-autumn season in
the area of the Cherepet1 (1964) and Moldavian SREPP (1965) and also in
the region of the Nevskiy chemical plant. In these expeditions, the con-
centrations of noxious substances were measured at several points located
at various distances, including considerable distances, from the source,
and the discharge of noxious substances, volume, velocity and temperature
of the escaping gases were simultaneously determined. The meteorological
observations included gradient measurements of the temperature and velocity
of the wind, and aerological measurements of the distribution of these ele-
ments and characteristics necessary for calculating the turbulent exchange
coefficient in the boundary layer of the atmosphere were also carried out.
Photographs of the smoke plume were taken and its parameters were deter-
mined visually both from the ground and from observations in an airplane
and helicopter.
For the Cherepet' SREPP, whose main discharge takes place from three
stacks 140 m high, the calculated concentration maxima q^ were 4.2 mg/m^
for ash and 1.4 mg/m^ for sulfur dioxide, and the corresponding experimental
qM values were 3.7 mg/rn^ and 1.8 mg/m^. The calculated and experimental
data on the unsafe wind velocity differed by no more than 1 m/sec.
A characteristic feature of the Moldavian SREPP was the discharge of
the impurity through a single stack of 180 m (one of the highest in the
USSR at that time) under conditions of a highly developed convection
characteristic of the south of the European territory of the USSR. Since
-------
wet ash purification was used, the overheating of the stack gases was
approximately 40°C, which was substantially below that of the Shchekino
and Cherepet' SREPP, where it reached 100-150°C. According to the results
given in [22], the calculated values of q« for sulfur dioxide were 0.26
^, and the unsafe velocity u^ « 2.5 m/sec; from experimental data,
0.3 mg/m^ and ity - 2-3 m/sec. A satisfactory agreement was also noted
in the distribution of the concentration q with the distance x. The zone
of highest concentrations was observed at a distance of 3-4 km from the
stacks, which corresponds to the results of the calculations.
In order to study the distribution of impurities pouring into the
atmosphere at relatively low temperatures, observations were made in the
region of the Nevskiy Chemical Plant. From plant stacks 100 m high, nitrogen
oxides were discharged with a temperature contrast of only 15-20°C relative
to the ambient air. According to experimental data [24], q^ « 0.17 mg/m->,
and according to calculations, q^ = 0.20 mg/rn^, and the unsafe velocities
in these cases decrease compared to those cited above and amount to 1-2 m/sec
according to calculations as well as observations.
On the basis of observational data on the smoke- plume from the Nevskiy
plant and from the stacks of the Cherepet1 and Moldavian SREPP, a satisfactory
agreement was noted between the calculated and observed initial ascents of
the smoke plume.
A series of theoretical conclusions have been confirmed by experimental
studies of the discharge of aerosols from specially constructed high sources.
They include experiments on the dumping of heavy fluorescent particles from
a 300-meter meteorological mast in the city of Obninsk [17]. Analysis of
these experiments showed a good agreement between the calculations and experi-
ments on settling of the impurity on the underlying surface. It was found
from both theoretical and experimental data that under convective conditions,
the propagation of the impurity depends relatively slightly on the settling
rates of the particles, and that the role of gravity settling Increases sub-
stantially in a stable stratification. Experiments on spraying of a liquid
aerosol from heights of 100 to 400 m were analyzed in [28]. In the majority
of experiments, confirmation of the theory by experimental data was obtained
with respect both to the values of the maximum precipitation of the liquid
and to the distances where they were observed. In the great majority of
cases, the differences did not exceed 30% of the calculated values. The
data given in [17 and 28] on the determination of the turbulent characteris-
tics k^ and <{>Q as the result of solution of the reverse diffusion problem
are in accord with the results of gradient and fluctuation observations.
In order to confirm the theoretical conclusions, in addition to the
indicated data of observations in the area of the Shchekino SREPP, use was
also made in [35] of data obtained from a survey of seven heat and power
plants with stack heights of 40 to 150 m, made by the Moscow Scientific
Research Institute of Hygiene from 1953 to 1958. This confirmed both the
calculated values of the concentration maximum and their dependence on the
stack height.
-------
In 1963-1965, a number of public health organizations carried out a
comprehensive cycle of surveys of atmospheric pollution around heat and
power plants located in various climatic zones of the USSR. This material
was presented to the Main Geophysical Observatory for analysis by the
Sanitary Epidemiological Administration of the Ministry of Public Health
of the USSR. Some results of its treatment and comparisons with the pre-
ceding formulas will be cited.
The concentrations of sulfur dioxide and ash around the Pridneprovskaya
SREPP with stack heights of 100-120 tn were determined by the Ukrainian
Institute of Communal Hygiene in 1963. Fig. 6 shows the distribution of
highest concentrations obtained versus the distance based on experimental
and calculated data.
q mg/m
Fig. 6.
Highest concentrations of sulfur
dioxide and dust at various dis-
tances from the Pridneprovskaya SREPP.
1 - measured dust concentrations,
2 - calculated ash concentrations,
3 - measured sulfur dioxide concentra-
tions, 4 - calculated sulfur dioxide
concentrations.
According to the results of the survey of the Serov SREPP with stacks
120 m high, carried out in 1963 by the Sverdlovsk Institute of Labor
Hygiene and Professional Diseases, it was found that qM for sulfur dioxide
amounts to 0.26 mg/m^, and for ash 4.5 mg/m^; according to calculations,
these values are 0.25 and 4.4 mg/m-*, respectively.
-------
The Novosibirsk Scientific Research Sanitation Institute carried out
a survey of the Kemerovo SREPP; for sulfur dioxide it was found that q^ -
3.2 mg/nr, and according to calculations, qM • 3.0 mg/rn^.
Data of surveys of a number of other SREPP and heat and power plants
(HPP) were used to compile Table 1, which lists experimental and calculated
values of qM for sulfur dioxide. It should be noted that these experimental
data are not complete; in particular, the number of samples taken was small,
but a definite agreement between them and the calculated values can be seen.
In many cases, agreement also exists for the dust concentrations. How-
ever, these data are not cited here, since the available information on the
efficiency of the ash catchers was not always reliable and was chiefly based
on specifications rather than factual data.
According to Tamson's data [42] pertaining to a Baltic SREPP with a
height of 150 m, the highest measured concentration of sulfur dioxide
q^j » 0.4 mg/m3, and the concentration calculated by means of the above
formula q^ = 0.6 mg/m3.
Table 1
Name
Minsk HPP
Tallinn HPP
Bobruysk HPP
Alma At a SREPP
Karaganda SREPP
Daugavpils HPP
Stack
height,
m
100
104
65
60
70-100
-
qM mg/m3
Experimental
0.22
less than MPC
Traces
Traces
0.6
Traces
Calculated
0.29
0.16
0.1
0.27
1.0
0.8
On the basis of the indicated data for heat and power plants, a graph
of
-------
by the State Institute for the Design and Planning of Metallurgical Plants.
The calculated data turned out to be slightly higher than the experimental
ones. This may apparently be explained by the fact that the limited amount
of observations did not permit the establishment of possible values of the
highest concentrations.
10*
10 r
M
1,0
0,1
o /
o 2
• §
so
100 150 180
50
100 150 //m
Fig. 7.
Graph of maximum concentrations of sulfur
dioxide (a) and dust (b) normalized to the
quantity of noxious substances discharged,
versus stack height H.
1 - experimental data, 2 - calculated data
In 1962-1963 a substantial modernization of the Chimkent lead plant
was carried out in order to purify the air reservoir in the adjacent areas;
in particular, the discharge of sulfur dioxide into the atmosphere was con-
siderably reduced, the height of stacks of the sintering section was raised
from 70 to 120 m, etc. According to data of the State Institute for the
Design and Planning of Nonferrous Metals Industry Establishments, the State
Institute of Nonferrous Metals and the State Institute for the Design and
Planning of Metallurgical Plants, the maximum concentration of sulfur dioxide
q^ before the modernization of the plant was 10 mg/m^, and after some
modernization, it dropped to approximately 2 mg/m^. Our calculations gave
for qM values, respectively, equal to 8.5 mg/m^ and 2.5 mg/m^.
Finally, we shall refer to the results of a survey of one of the major
metallurgical plants in the south of the Ukraine, made in the summer of 1967.
The distribution of dust up to a distance of 18 km from the plant is given
in [16], based on observational data.
On the basis of observational data, the maximum dust concentration was
4 rag/m^, and according to calculated data, 3 mg/m^.
-------
On the whole, it may be concluded that there is a satisfactory agree-
ment between the calculated and experimental data, particularly if it is
considered that only approximate values for the discharge parameters were
known.
Some theoretical conclusions used in developing a method for calculat-
ing the dispersal of discharges from high stacks, in particular, conclusions
of the theory of summer convective conditions, have been definitely confirmed
by analyzing data of regular observations of pollution of city air reservoirs
[All.
m
2
10
i. 5
i.O
0.5
0
/m^
-1
2
i
7XKN
Fig. 8.
Highest sulfur dioxide concentrations
at various distances from the Chelyabinsk
Metallurgical Plant.
1 - calculated, 2 - experimental.
In summing up the discussion of the experimental verification of the
method of calculation, let us note that the theoretical considerations of
the patterns of dispersal of noxious discharges from various industrial
enterprises in the atmosphere have been substantially confirmed for differ-
ent meteorological conditions and climatic zones. The experimental data
pertained to the most common ingredients of industrial discharges - sulfur
dioxide and dust (ash); a complex characteristic of the discharge parameters
is the quantity f introduced above (28); the experiments covered enterprises
for which f reached 5-6, and sometimes even higher values. All of this
forms a basis for the use of the method described for a broad class of
operating and planned facilities, primarily for enterprises of the metal-
lurgical, petroleum refining, chemical, and a number of other branches of
industry.
-------
LITERATURE CITED
1. A ii A [ic en n. M. Pnccenmto 11 iio.iAyxo ra;iou, uijOpachiitac-MUx npoMUiiiJicmiiiiMii
npCAiipjiiiTHHMii. FoccTpol'uriAaT. M., 1952.
2. BcpJiiniA M./E. K Tcopim TypOyjieimioft AHy3Hit. Tpyau FFO, nun. 138,
1963.
3. Bop .'i M u A M. 11. KJiiiMarojioi ii'ictKiii: acncKTU iiccJieAonamui. .larpnaiiciittti arwocipcpu
iipoMuuiJiciiiib MII BuGpocaiwii. CuupcMciiuiiie npoGjiCMbi KjiiiMaTOJioriiu. FHAPOMCT-
II3A8T, Jl.. IOC6.
4. BepJiHiiA M. ,E. OC onaciiux ycjionnnx :iarpfi3Heiuin aiMoccjiepu npoMbiuiJicmiUMH
Hu6pocaMii. TpyAU FFO, nun. 185, 19C5.
5. 13 ep JIM n ;i M. E. McTcopojioni'iecKiic npo6jicMu oGccne>iciimi IHCTOTU aiMocipepbi.
MeTeopojiormi u FiiApojiornsi, N« 11, 1007.
6. Be p Jin u A M. II. Ocuouiiue n|>o6jieim>i aTMoc(|iepnofi Aiu|)(|)y:)iiH H aarpiiaiiemin 1103-
Ayxa. Fjianiia« rcocpiiaiPiecKan oGccpuaropnn HM. A. M. BooiiKOaa aa 50 ner Co-
BercKofl B^actii. FiiApoMcrcoii:iAiiT, Jl., 1967.
7. Bcp/isiiiA M. E., FCIIIIXOBHM H. Jl., JI o >K K u H a B. FI., OiiHKy^ P. H. HHC-
Jieinioo pemeiiiie ypaBiieiiini Typ6yjieHTiioii ;uu|»l)y:tiiH u packer sarpnaiieiliifl 3TMO-
c(|)opu u6^ii3H npoMuui/iciuiux iipeAiipiiflTiiii. T;)yAW FFO, BUM. 138, 1963.
8. B e p Ji u a A M. E., O u u K y Ji P. M., F e n M x o B ;"i >i E. Jl., Jl o >K K u u a B. FI. O sa-
rpM3iieiiiiii aTMoccpepu npoMbiiii^ciiiiuMii BwCpocaMii npu anoMa/ibiibix yc/iOBiixx
crpaTHipiiKanHM. MeTeopoJioriiH H rHApo.ioriiH, J\l> 8, 1963.
9. B e p n a n A M. E., FCHHXOBH'I E. Jl., O H n K y n P. H. O pacieie aarpajiiemiH
aTMOccbcpu ubiOpocaMii in AUMOBLJX rpyfi a^eKTpocTaHuuu. TpyAta FFO, sun. 158,
1964.
10. B e p Ji a n A M. E., F c n n x o u n M E. Jl., Jl o iK K n H a B. FT, O n n K y Ji P. H. MIIC-
Jieiiuoe HccjicAOBainie aTMOc(|>epnoi"i AH())c])y3iiH npu nopwajibiibix H aHOMajibiiux
ycJioiinHX CTpaTH(|)iiKaiuiH. TpyAU FFO, BLIII. 158, 1964.
11. BepjitniA M. E., Fen ii x o ii ii'i E. Jl., Jl o >K K 11 n a B. FI., 0 H n K y Ji P. H. Oco-
OeiuiocTH Ainpjjjy^"" mwejioii npiwiecH n arMOC^epe. TpyAW FFO, nun. 158, 1964.
12. D o p Ji H ii A M. E., F c n H x o ii n 'i E. Jl., Jl e M i> a u o B n w B. K. HeKoropue aKTyajiu-
nue Bonpocu MccJieAouaiimi aTMocijicpiioJi ;mi|)(py3iiH. TpyAU FFO, aun. 172, 1965.
13. B e p Ji si n A M. E., O 11 n K y Ji P. H., P H 6 o 11 a F. B. K Teopmi aTMoctpepuoA AHcpipy-
3Hii u ycjioiiiiiix ryMaiia. TpyAbi FFO, nun. 207, 1968.
14. B e p Ji ii n A M. E., FciiiixnuiiM E. Jl., K y p u u 6 n H O. H. Bjimimie pcjii»ci|>a
iia paciipocTpaiiciniu npuMocu or IICTO'IIIIIKU. llacx. c6.
15. ByAUKo M. H. Mciiapcmie u ccTecTncmibix ycjioBnax. FnApoMeTcoiiSAaT, Jl., 1948.
16. By pen MM II. C., Foponixo 15. 13., llbtiuuCB B. H. ctKcneAMUiioiiiioe inyneinie
3arpii3iieiniH iKcjioii npiiMecu
no AainibiM oiibiToa na 300-MCTpouoii iweTeopojioni'iccKofl Ma>ire. TpyAU FFO,
iibin. 172, 1965.
18. Bonpocu aTMOC(|)cpnoii ;(ii(|j(py3iiii n 3ar|»i3iicnnn iiosAyxa (noA PCA. M. E. Bep-
Ji >i n A a). TpyAM ITO, ubin. 138, IUG3; nun. 158, 1964; uun. 172, 1965; nun. 185,
1966; »un. 207, 1968.
19. BpeMCiinafi MCTOAiixa pacMCTou paccciiuainiii u aTMoc(|>epc uuCpocOB (riojiu n ccp-
nncTbix rason) n:i ;IM»IOI)MX rpyfi sjieKTpocTaiiunii. Tpy;iu FFO, nun. 172, 1965.
20. F a ii A n n Jl. C., C o Ji o B c ii M n K P. 3. O pacnpocTpaiicnmi AUMa in
rpyG. TpyAU I'FO. 111.111. 77. I'J58.
21. F o n ii x o H ii M E. Jl., F p a'i c B a B. 11. Anajnn Aiicncpcnn ropiuoiiTajibiiux
iinii iiaiipaujiciuin Beipa. TpyA" I'FO, nun. 172, 1965.
22. F H Ji b A c 11 c K n o Ji u A P. C., F o p o in K o B. B., FI a n (p H Ji o B a F. A., P n x -
rep B. B. Pesyjibraru 9KciiepnMeiiTajii-.ni.ix nccjieAOBannfl 3arpsi3iieiiiin aTMOccjjcpu
B paftoHC MojiAaucKoii FP3C. TpyAu ITO, nun. 207, 1968.
23. F o p Ji H n C. M., 3 p a >K e B c K n ft H. M. Hsyieiwc oorcKaHiin MOACJicfi pe/ibet)ia n
aacipOHKH B aspoAHiiaMimecKOfi Tpyfie. Hacr. cC.
-------
LITERATURE (Cont'd)
2'J. I'opnuiKo B. I)., fl a n i|> n ;i o ua I*. A.. I' n .'i i. ;i e n c K n on i. A P. C., P n x •
rep IS. B. Pe.iyjiiiTaTU iia(">.nioA<.'iiiii"t :ia .i,u'|i;; nu'imcM arMOCijicpu OKiicjiaMii u:iora
or xiiMii'iecKoro J.'IUOAH. Tpy/iu I'l'O, 111.11:. liSij, l!)(i(j.
25. F o p o in K o b. l>. Hi'KOTopue ocoiViinociii puciipocTpniicniiii npivuiux npiiMecefi or
IIIJCOKIIX iicTO'iiniKon u :iii'ieci\nx paiionax. Tpy;ii>i ITO, nun. 185. I960.
27. A o p r a >i e B H. B. Pac'icnibie (jiop.Myjiw ;UIH onpuAeviuiiiiii rasoouix mirpeAiieHTOB
;UJiM,i D aTMOc<|>cpnoM Bo:t;iyxe. Furiieiia n camiTap.iisi, Ne 5, 1953.
28. Ay »c K n ii B. ., HesAiopona H. C., On UK y A P. H. O pacK c B c K n ii H. M., Aop°^eiiKO B. H., M e n n K H. T. HccfleaoaaHiie
paa^ii'iHux (jiopM peJiiieip.'i iia xupaKTcpiicTiiKii Bo:iAyunioro noTOKa B
ii3HKa norpaiumnoro cnoa atMoctpcpw. rnApOMeTeon3Aar, Jl.,
1961.
31. MiiKpOKJiiiMaT CCCP. FIoA peA. H. A. Fo.n i>u6ep r. I'liApoMeTConsAaT, JI., 1967.
32. McToopo.nonni n atOMiiaii aiicpnin. ricp. c auivi. HOA pe;i. IS. K. ^CAOpona. H/l,
AV. 1959.
33. M o u u ii A. C. riojiy3Mii ipiiMocKaii Toopnn Typfiy^ciiTiioii An<]><|>y3iui. TpyAW reoIrflOM A. A\. CTarncTii'iccKaii niApoMexaiiHKa. «HayKa», Al, 1965.
35. O n n K y A P. H., fl a n i|> n a o n a T. A., P n x T c p 13. B., F n n b A c u c K H o n i> A P. C.
Pp:iyjii.TaTU aiinjiii.-iii 3KcnopiiMeiiTn^i,ni,ix ;iaiiin,i.x, xapaKTepiinyioiiiHx pacnpeACJie-
line uTMoc<|)cpiiLi.\ aarpnanciiiiii iiOjin.'iii TCUJIOULIX a^cKipocraiiuiiii. TpyAbi fTO,
nun. 172. 1965.
36. DpcAC^biio-AonycTiiMiJc KoiiueiiTpaium opeAiiux ncinecjn B aTMOC(|)cpiiOM nosAyxe iia-
ceJieiuiux MCCT. MiiiniCTCpcTno aApauooxpaneiniH CCCP, M., 1967.
37. Camrrapnuc nopMhi iipocKTiipouaiiiui upoMijiiuioiiiibix ;ipo;inpnnTiirt (CM 245-63).
CrpofuinAaT, M., I9G3.
38. COT TO n O. P. AAiiKpoMCTeopOJionifi. I'liApoMuTcoiciAaT, Jl., 1956.
39. C o Ji o M a T n n a H. 11. B.>iii>nuie |KVII,CI|UI 11:1 ckopocri, norpa u TypOy.icimiuit oCMOii
B npincMiioM no:i;iyxi;. TpyAU ITO, 111.111. 158, 19G4.
40. Cnpauo'imiK no MCTCopo;ioniu .M :iarp>i:iiiciiino no:uiyxa i\i\n iiioKeiiepos. (Ha wnoncK.
J13.). IlOA I'CA. K. H T 0. TOKIIO, liKif).
41. Co u I>K u n Jl. P. HcKOTopuc pc:iwn.raiE,i riiiioiiTiiKO-K^MMaTO/ioriiMCCKoro aiia;iii3a
aarpnaiu-iuiii no.i.'iyxa u ropOAax. Tpy;u,i ITO, 111,111. 207, I9G8.
42. TOM co 11 H. M. O pacceiiuaiinu AUMOBI.IX rasi.n ripnOa^TiiiicKoii FP3C. HJBCCTHSI AH
3CCP, awn. 4, 1963.
43. yKaaamifi no pac'iery pacceiiuaimn u aT.Moc<|>i>pc upcjuiux seiuecTu (nbuiii H cepnn-
cToro ra.ia), co;iep>Kamii.\csi u uwCpocax iipoMuiii^cinibix npeAnpiinTiiA. (CH 369-67).
FoccTpoii CCCP, riiApoMeTeoiinAaT. JI., 19G7.
44. LUeJiefixoBCKiiH F. B. 3aAHMJienne lopOAon., M., 1949.
45. Air Pollution (S t e r n A. cd.) vol. 1, Acad. Pross., New York. 1967.
46. Bosanciuet C. H., Pearson I. H. The spread of smoke and gases from chim-
neys. Trans. Farad. Soc., vol. 32, 193G.
47. C h a m b e r 1 a i n A. C. Aspect of travel and deposition of aerosol and vapour clouds.
Atomic Energy Research Establishment. HR/R 1261, 1953.
48. Cramer L. A. Engineering estimates of atmospheric dispersal capacity. Amer. Ind.
Hyg. Assoc. J. Bd. 20, 1959.
49. Mead P. S. Meteorological aspects of peaceful uses of atomic energy. Part 1, WMO.
Tech. note, N 33, 1960.
50. Hawkins I. E., Nonhebcl G. Chimneys and the dispersal of smoke. J. Inst.
Fuel (28 (178), 1955.
51. P a s q u i 11 F. Atmospheric diffusion. London, 1962.
52. Sutton 0. G. Theoretical distribution of airborne pollution from factory chimneys.
Quart. J. Roy. Met. Soc., 73, 1947.
53. W i p p e r m a n F. Moglichkeit einer theoretischcn. Einfassung des ausbreitungs Far-
ganges. Staub, b. 21, N 2. 19G1.
-------
STUDY OF THE STRUCTURE OF A SMOKE JET AND DETERMINATION OF
THE COEFFICIENT OF TURBULENT MIXING FROM
THE VERTICAL DISTRIBUTION OF CONCENTRATIONS
V. S. Yeliseyev
From Trudy, Glavnaya Geoflz. Observat. im. A. I. Voeykova, No. 234,
p. 95-99, (1968).
In the study of the diffusion of gases from plant stacks in the ground
layer of the atmosphere, the usual methods of air sample collection may
prove to be very difficult. Indeed, if the investigations are conducted in
an urban residential district, it is extremely difficult and sometimes im-
possible to carry out the sampling above a smoke jet, which changes direction
with variations in the wind direction. The difficulties increase if the
sampling is performed above an invisible smoke plume such as is observed,
for example, in the case of industrial plants producing synthetic fiber.
At the same time, in order to solve a number of technical problems
connected with the installation of air pipes supplying clean air into the
shop of industrial enterprises and in connection with some meteorological
problems, it is of major interest to study the vertical concentration pro-
file. The literature contains a relatively small amount of data on the
study of the structure of smoke jets.
In the U.S.A. in 1943, Hewson and Gill [6] measured the concentration
of sulfur dioxide in the Columbia River valley, using light monoplanes and
captive balloons 1200 ft 3 in volume. In 1958, Stewart et al. [7] studied
the vertical profile of concentrations in a radioactive plume using mobile
balloons. However, all these studies were made relatively close to the
source.
To overcome the above-mentioned obstacles, we attempted to develop the
technique of sampling by using a helicopter. The great maneuverability of
the helicopter in air, the possibility of measuring the concentrations in
the smoke jet itself and the small investment of time on collecting the air
samples at different points permit the use of the helicopter for the study of
atmospheric pollution. The main elements of the planning and execution of
observations from a helicopter consist in the following:
Selection of the type of helicopter as a function of its flight
characteristics.
Study of the effect of the air currents created by the helicopter pro-
peller on the sampling process, and study of the principle of arrangement
of the instrumentation inside the helicopter.
Determination of the type of instruments used for sampling gaseous
ingredients.
-------
Study of the flight technique of the helicopter and collection of air
samples.
Chemical analysis of the air samples.
Reduction of the data obtained to a form suitable for comparison with
calculated values .
Correlation of the concentrations of gaseous ingredients with meteorolog-
ical parameters.
In March 1967 in the city of Krasnoyarsk, an MI-1 helicopter was used
for the study of the structure of a smoke jet. The study of the character-
istics of the air currents generated by the helicopter propeller and their
influence on the process of sample collection, as well as the arrangement of
the Instruments, were described in [4]. During the collection of representa-
tive samples from the helicopter, the suction apparatus for taking the samples
was mounted in the nose of the helicopter and was moved slightly in front of
the Pitot tube.
The air samples were collected for analysis for hydrogen sulfide
and carbon disulfide (CS2> , discharged by the stacks of a synthetic fiber
plant. The chemical analysis was performed in the water chemistry laboratory
after the flights.
The smoke plume from the stacks of the synthetic fiber plant included a
small visible portion ("100-200 m from the source) , which aided in the deter-
mination of the direction of the smoke Jet. At a given height and velocity
of the flight (60-70 km/hr) , the measurements were made at distances of 0.5,
1.5 and 3 km from the source and along the vertical at three heights depend-
ing on the ascent of the smoke jet; on the whole, for all the days of flight,
the samples were taken at heights of 50, 100, 150, 200, 250 and 300 m above
the earth's surface. The helicopter flew through the smoke jet in a perpen-
dicular direction without going beyond it.
However, since at these distances the smoke jet was invisible, its
width was calculated during the flight. Data on the initial visible portion
of the jet were used for this purpose, and the coefficient of horizontal mix-
ing was calculated in accordance with [5], and the width of the smoke plume
was then calculated at different distances. The time of sample collection
was 20 min. In five days, 196 samples for hydrogen sulfide and carbon disul-
fide were taken. At the same time, automobiles with mounted equipment were
used to measure the concentrations of the same gases near the earth's surface.
Since on the earth's surface the concentration was measured on the jet axis,
in plotting the vertical profile of the impurity distribution it was necessary
to switch from the integrated average value to the axial concentration.
In order to obtain this relationship, use may be made of calculations of
the transverse distribution of the concentration in the jet as a function of
the dispersion of horizontal fluctuations of the wind direction Q, in accord-
ance with [2]. If the effective width of the smoke jet is denoted by R, and
the concentration on the jet axis qlysQ^qoCx, z) , then
-------
whence
y
I7 ^ (>
(1)
As an example, Fig. la shows the vertical profile of the axial concen-
tration of hydrogen sulfide (to the left of zero) and carbon disulfide (to
the right of zero), which occurred in the smoke jet of 21 March 1967 at 10-
11 hr and 15-16 hr at a distance of 500 m from the source. Fig. Ib shows
the vertical profile of the temperature (1) and wind (2) for the same
period of time.
Analysis of the graph (Fig. 1) shows that the concentration of carbon
disulfide at a distance of 500 m from the source at 10-11 hr on the plume
axis is almost 20 times the value at the earth's surface and approximately
50 times the MFC. The hydrogen sulfide concentration at the same distance
from the source and at the same height is almost 30 times the MFC and 110
times the concentration at the earth's surface.
At the same time, analysis of the graph (Fig. 1) shows that the layer
in which the smoke jet spreads is highly stratified, an inversion begins at
the earth's surface, and its upper boundary is located at a height of 475 m.
7 ^ 3 4- 5 6 7 3 3 1G 11 L'm/seo
t 2 3 4 5 S 7 8 9 1C ?Z
-------
It will be shown below that the coefficient of turbulent mixing in the
layer of propagation of the smoke jet was 0.2-0.A m^/sec at that time. Be-
cause of such slight vertical mixing, the profile of the vertical concentra-
tion distribution is characterized by a large maximum on the axis of the
smoke jet. By 15-16 hrs, a rearrangement of the temperature field took
place. The layer of the atmosphere had now begun to be characterized by a
stable state and a higher degree of turbulence (k=8 m2/sec). In addition
to the rearrangement of the temperature field and turbulent mixing, a change
occurred in the distribution of the gaseous ingredients in height.
At 15-16 hrs, the concentration began to be more evenly distributed in
the vertical direction and the dispersal of the impurity occurred much faster.
Thus, the maximum carbon disulflde concentration on the axis of the smoke
jet was only 20 times the MFC, and the hydrogen sulfide concentration,
13 times the MFC.
On the basis of the data obtained, an attempt was made to calculate the
vertical coefficient of turbulent mixing from the distribution of the con-
centration in the smoke jet.
The equation of turbulent diffusion [1] for a linear source can be used
for this purpose. When the impurity source is located at a sufficient
height, where the exchange coefficient undergoes little change with height,
for the calculation one can take the solution of the diffusion equation with
constant coefficients
C\ _. — ——" .—L- I /o\
7,tv ~\^ ~:^ L '"•••<•<" J-/, 4KX''U (2)
where Q is the capacity of the source; u is the average wind velocity; x is
the distance from the source; k is the coefficient of turbulent mixing; H is
the effective source height; z is the vertical distance from the earth's sur-
face.
From the ratio of the integrated concentrations at three neighboring
levels one can obtain a system of two equations:
(x, *!
(3)
The quantity S was determined from equation (4), which was solved
numerically with a computer
-------
Thus, the coefficient of vertical turbulent mixing in the smoke jet
may be determined from the formula
*/)"
(zj~x,)S-\-\i\
I-!
~-lt.S
(5)
where i and j are consecutive numbers of the height levels at which the
concentration is being determined.
The calculated values of the coefficient of turbulent mixing k are
given in Table 1. For comparison, the same table lists values of the
coefficient of turbulent mixing calculated from the formula k=k^h, where h
is the height of the ground layer of the atmosphere.
The coefficients of turbulent mixing at a height of 1 m were calculated
by using data of meteorological observations for the same period according
to M. I. Budyko's formula [3]. It is assumed that the coefficient of turbu-
lent mixing increases linearly up to the height of the ground sublayer, and
above this height the quantity h is assumed to be constant. For our calcu-
lations, h was taken as 100 m. Analysis of the data obtained shows a satis-
factory agreement of the coefficients of turbulent mixing calculated from
the distribution of concentrations in the plume and from the corresponding
formula. The difference in the exchange coefficients of 21 March at 10 A.M.
is obviously due to the fact that the layer in which the smoke jet was
spreading was at that time subjected to the influence of the inversion state
of the atmosphere, whereas the calculation of k-^ can be carried out only for
an equilibrium state of the atmosphere.
Table 1
Date
17 111 1967
20
•'>i
. i
22
23
Time, hr.
11
12
11
13
10
15
Distance
From
Source , m
50;>
1,500
50!)
30U)
r,oo
f)(!l>
i;> r,oo
14
1°
13
1500
2000
-1000
k ra^/sec from the
distribution of
Hydrogen
Sulfide
4
_
20
24
0,2
8
—
•1
.'»
• "
Carbon
Disulfide
4 •'
Si 5
16
—
0,4
a
14
IK
4
1,3
O /
k=k^h nr/sec.
5
1 O
iy
i •*
I**
11
.>
The good agreement of the data obtained also indicates a representative
character of the concentrations measured in the smoke jet.
-------
LITERATURE CITED
1. B c p Ji n ii A M. 1:., I'o 11 H x u 11 M'i I7,. .'I., ,/i o >K K n M a Li. 11, O n u K y .1 P. II. Hue-
.iriiiiot! PIMIICIIIU' ypaiiik'iiiu: Typoy.u ..niiiii .iih|)ij)>:iiin n paoior iiarpujiieiiiii; ar.MO-
cijicpu iifi.'iiutii ii|)o.\ii.iiii.'U'iini.ix iipc,uipii>iTiiii. T|i. 1TO, HIJII. I3t>, 1%3.
2. 1> L> p ;i n n ;i M. II, I'f n n x o » n >i I:. ./I., }[ c M i. >i n o » n M B. Iv. IK'Xoiopi.ie aKrya.ii>-
IIMC iioiipocu iiccJK'.aoii.'-niii aTMOa]>i'piH)i't ^iiii|)i|)y:iiin. Tp. 1TO, nun. 172, I!)ii5.
3. liy.'iUKo M. H. TypCiy.: ..ibiii oljMcii 11 iniwinix c.ionx aT.\ioc(|iepu. McTeopo.'ioriin 11
rn:i|>o.normi, jNV '2, l!)-iu.
4. F o p o in K o 13. ii., I: n u c o e u B. C., 11 a :i a p e n K o U. c/\. K TCxmiKe liafi.iioacmiM
aiMOapcpiioro :mrp>i:iiic'ini>i c IIOMOIUI.IO iii-pTuJic'ra. Tp. ITO, BUII. 207, 19G7.
5. Efliiceea B. C. K iionpocy o rop:i:>uirr:i;ii5.
G. Hews on \V. E., and Gill G. C. Mcleoroloiyical Invcstii,'ation in Columbia l
-------