STUDY OF TECHNICAL AND COST INFORMATION
                       FOR
             GAS CLEANING EQUIPMENT
                      IN THE
                      LIME
                       AND
SECONDARY NON-FERROUS METALLURGICAL INDUSTRIES
           INDUSTRIAL GAS CLEANING INSTITUTE, INC.

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS  CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC
                          Contract No.  CPA 70-150






              STUDY OF TECHNICAL AND  COST INFORMATION




                                   FOR




                        GAS CLEANING EQUIPMENT




                                  IN THE




     LIME  AND SECONDARY NON-FERROUS METALLURGICAL INDUSTRIES






                             FINAL REPORT






                        (Submitted December 31, 1970)




                                    by




                      L. C. Hardison, Coordinating Engineer




                        H. R. Herington, Project Director






                      Industrial Gas Cleaning Institute, Inc.



                        Box 448, Rye, New York 10580
                                Prepared for



                The National Air Pollution Control  Administration




-------
INDUSTRIAL     GAS CLEANING    INSTITU1E, INC
                     INDUSTRIAL GAS CLEANING INSTITUTE,  INC.
    150 Purchase Street
    AMERICAN AIR FILTER CO., INC.
    AMERICAN STANDARD, INC.
        Industrial Products Div.
    ARCO INDUSTRIES CORPORATION
    BELCO POLLUTION CONTROL CORP.
    BUELL ENGINEERING CO., INC.
    BUFFALO FORGE COMPANY
    THE CARBORUNDUM CO.
        Pollution Control Div.
    CHEMICAL CONSTRUCTION CORP.
        Pollution Control Div.
    DELTA PINCORPORATED
    THE DUCON CO., INC.
    DUSTEX DIVISION
        American Precision Industries
    FISHER-KLOSTERMAN, INC.
    FULLER COMPANY, DRACCO PRODUCTS
    GALLAGHER-KAISER CORPORATION
    THE KIRK & BLUM MANUFACTURING CO.
Box 448
                                         MEMBERS
Rye, New York 10580
          KOERTROL CORPORATION
               Sub. of Schutte & Koerting Co.
          KOPPERS COMPANY, INC.
               Metal Products Division
          MIKROPUL
               Div. of The Slick Corp.
          NATIONAL DUST COLLECTOR CORP.
               Sub. of Environeering, Inc.
          'PEABODY ENGINEERING CORP.
          PRECIPITAIR POLLUTION CONTROL, INC.
               Sub. of Advance Ross Corp.
          PRECIPITATION ASSOCIATES OF AMERICA
          RESEARCH-COTTRELL, INC.
          SEVERSKY ELECTRONATOM CORP.
          THE TORIT CORPORATION
          UOP AIR CORRECTION DIVISION
          WESTERN PRECIPITATION DIVISION
               Joy Manufacturing Co.
          WHEELABRATOR CORPORATION
          ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
                               STATEMENT OF PURPOSES

    The Industrial Gas Cleaning Institute, incorporated in 1960 in the State of New York, was founded to
    further the interests of manufacturers of air pollution control equipment, by

    encouraging  the general improvement of engineering  and technical  standards in  the manufacture,
    installation, operation, and performance of equipment

    disseminating information on air pollution; the effect of industrial gas cleaning on public health; and
    general economic; social, scientific, technical, and governmental matters affecting the industry, together
    with the views of the members thereon; and

    promoting the industry through desirable advertising and publicity.
                                  ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
    The efforts of the IGCI Engineering Standards Committee in the preparation, editing and reviewing of
    this Report are gratefully acknowledged:

                        Harry Krockta, Chairman, The Ducon Company, Inc.
                             G. L. Brewer, UOP Air Correction Division
                              C. A. Gallaer, Buell Engineering Co., Inc.
                             N. D. Phillips, Fuller Co., Dracco Products

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC.
                                TABLE OF CONTENTS
       IV.
Introduction
Summary of Technical Data
Technical Data
A.     General Description
B.     Process Descriptions and Costs
       1.      Rotary Lime Kilns
              a.      Description
              b.      Specifications and Costs of
                    Air Pollution Control Equipment
              c.      Discussion
       2.      Brass/Bronze Reverberatory Furnaces
       3.      Lead Cupolas
       4.      Lead/Aluminum Sweating Furnaces
       5.      Lead Reverberatory Furnaces
       6.      Zinc Calcination Furnaces
       7.      Aluminum Chlorination Stations
C.     Discussion of Costs
       1.      Comparison of Installed Costs
       2.      Discussion of Operating Costs
D.     Installation and Test Data
       1.      Rotary Lime Kilns
       2.      Brass/Bronze Reverberatory Furnaces
       3.      Lead Cupolas and Reverberatory Furnaces
       4.      Lead/Aluminum Sweating Furnaces
       5.      Zinc Calcination Furnaces
       6.      Aluminum Chlorination Stations
Conclusions and Recommendations
       List of Figures
       List of Tables
       List of Appendices
Page No.

    1
    5
    7
    7
   20
   24
   24

   38
   57
   62
   91
  113
  135
  158
  162
  176
  176
  195
  199
  199
  228
  232
  235
  242
  246

-------
1
INDUSTRIAL GAS CLEANING INSTITUTE, INC.
V^^^^^^^^^H^^^^^^^^^^H^^M
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
LIST OF FIGURES
Process Flow Sketch for Typical Lime Kiln
Costs of Electrostatic Precipitators for Rotary Lime Kilns
(LA-Process Weight)
Costs of Electrostatic Precipitators for Rotary Lime Kilns (High
Efficiency)
Costs of Fabric Collectors for Rotary Lime Kilns
Costs of Wet Scrubbers for Rotary Lime Kilns (LA-Process Weight)
Costs of Wet Scrubbers for Rotary Lime Kilns (High Efficiency)
Comparison of Abatement Costs for Rotary Lime Kilns
Process Flow Sketch of Brass/Bronze Reverberatory Furnaces
Cost of Fabric Collectors for Brass/Bronze Reverberatory Furnaces
Cost of Wet Scrubbers for Brass/Bronze Reverberatory Furnaces
( LA-Process Weight)
Cost of Wet Scrubbers for Brass/Bronze Reverberatory Furnaces
(High Efficiency)
Comparison of Abatement Costs for Brass/Bronze Reverberatory
Furnaces
Process Flow Sketch of Lead Blast Furnace or Cupola
Costs of Fabric Collectors for Lead Cupolas
Costs of Wet Scrubbers for Lead Cupolas
Process Flow Sketch of Typical Reverberatory Furnace Sweating

Page No.
25
44
45
51
58
59
60
64
80
87
88
89
92
105
110

              Facility                                                              115

Figure 17      Typical  Fabric  Collector  Installation  for  Reverberatory  Furnace
              Sweating Facility                                                     119

Figure 18      Typical  Wet  Scrubbing  Installation  for  Reverberatory  Furnace

-------
INDUSTRIAL GAS CLEANING INSTITUTE,
INC.
Page No.
Figure 19
Figure 20
Figure 21
Figure 22
Figure 23
Figure 24
Figure 25
Figure 26
Figure 27
Figure 28
Costs of Fabric Collectors for Sweating Furnaces
Costs of Wet Scrubbers for Sweating Furnaces
Comparison of Abatement Equipment Costs for Sweating Furnaces
Process Flow Sketch for Lead Reverberatory Furnace
Process Flow Sketch for Lead Reverberatory Furnace with Wet
Scrubber
Costs of Fabric Collectors for Lead Reverberatory Furnaces
Costs of Wet Scrubbers for Lead Reverberatory Furnaces
Process Flow Sketch for Aluminum Chlorination Station
Wet Scrubber Cost Data for Aluminum Chlorination Stations
(LA-Process Weight)
Wet Scrubber Cost Data for Aluminum Chlorination Stations (High
Efficiency)
129
132
134
139
141
151
157
164
175

-------
INDUSTRIAL GAS CLEANING INSTITUTE, INC.

Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4
Table 5
Table 6
Table 7
Table 8
Table 9
Table 10
Table 11
Table 12
Table 13
Table 14
Table 15
Table 16
Table 17
Table 18
Table 19
LIST OF TABLES
Definition of Collector Types Applicable to Various Industrial Areas
Selection of Participants in Narrative and Specification Writing
Participants in Specification Writing Seminar and Workshop
Participants in Process Narrative Writing
LA-Process Weight and Allowable Emissions
Definition of Outlet Grain Loadings for High Efficiency Level Bids
City Cost Indices
Average Hourly Labor Rates by Trade
Typical Analysis of Commercial High Calcium and Dolomitic
Limestones
Typical Exhaust Gas Production for Various Lime Kiln Sizes
Typical Chemical Analysis of Lime Kiln Emissions
Electrostatic Precipitator Process Description for Rotary Lime Kiln
Specification
Electrostatic Precipitator Operating Conditions for Rotary Lime Kiln
Specification
Electrostatic Precipitator Cost Data for Rotary Lime Kilns
Fabric Collector Process Description for Rotary Lime Kiln
Specification
Fabric Collector Operating Conditions for Rotary Lime Kiln
Specification
Fabric Collector Cost Data for Rotary Lime Kilns
Wet Scrubber Process Description for Rotary Lime Kiln Specification
Wet Scrubber Operating Conditions for Rotary Lime Kiln

Page No.
10
12
13
15
17
18
22
23
28
31
33
40
41
42
48
49
50
54

Table 20
Specification                                                        55




-------
INDUSTRIAL GAS CLEANING INSTITUTE, INC.
Table 21
Table 22
Table 23
Table 24
Table 25
Table 26
Table 27
Table 28
Table 29
Table 30
Table 31
Table 32
Table 33
Table 34
Table 35
Table 36
Table 37
Table 38
Table 39
Table 40
Table 41
Wet Scrubber Cost Data for Rotary Lime Kilns (High Efficiency)
Types of Copper-Bearing Scrap
Brass/Bronze Reverberatory Furnace Particulate Emissions — Test 1
Emission From Baghouse on Brass/Bronze Reverberatory Furnace —
Test 2
Brass/Bronze Reverberatory Furnace Particulate Emissions - Test 3
Gaseous Emissions from Brass/Bronze Reverberatory Furnace
Fabric Collector Process Description for Brass/Bronze Reverberatory
Furnace Specification
Fabric Col lector Operating Conditions for Brass/Bronze Reverberatory
Furnace Specification
Fabric Collector Cost Data for Brass/Bronze Reverberatory Furnaces
Wet Scrubber Process Description for Brass/Bronze Reverberatory
Furnace Specification
Wet Scrubber Operating Conditions for Brass/Bronze Reverberatory
Furnace Specification
Wet Scrubber Cost Data for Brass/Bronze Reverberatory Furnaces
(LA-Process Weight)
Wet Scrubber Cost Data for Brass/Bronze Reverberatory Furnaces
(High Efficiency)
Typical Composition of Lead Cupola Charge
Typical Properties of Cast Hard Lead
Calculated Concentrations of Lead and Antimony Fume
Fabric Collector Process Description for Lead Cupola Specification
Fabric Collector Operating Conditions for Lead Cupola Specification
Fabric Collector Cost Data for Lead Cupolas
Wet Scrubber Process Description for Lead Cupola Specification
Wet Scrubber Operating Conditions for Lead Cupola Specification
Page No.
57
63
69
70
71
72
76
78
81
82
84
85
86
94
95
98
102
103
104
106

-------
INDUSTRIAL GAS CLEANING INSTITUTE
, INC.
Page No.
Table 42
Table 43
Table 44
Table 45
Table 46
Table 47
Table 48
Table 49
Table 50
Table 51
Table 52
Table 53
Table 54
Table 55
Table 56
Table 57
Table 58
Table 59
Wet Scrubber Cost Data for Lead Cupolas (LA-Process Weight)
Wet Scrubber Cost Data for Lead Cupolas (High Efficiency)
Fabric Collector Process Description for Sweating Furnace
Specification
Fabric Collector Operating Conditions for Sweating Furnace
Specification
Fabric Collector Cost Data for Sweating Furnaces
Wet Scrubber Process Description for Sweating Furnace Specification
Wet Scrubber Operating Conditions for Sweating Furnace
Specification
Wet Scrubber Cost Data for Sweating Furnaces
Comparison of Total Annual Costs for Wet Scrubbers and Fabric
Collectors for Sweating Furnaces
Fabric Collector Process Description for Lead Reverberatory Furnace
Specification
Fabric Collector Operating Conditions for Lead Reverberatory
Furnace Specification
Fabric Collector Cost Data for Lead Reverberatory Furnaces
Wet Scrubber Process Description for Lead Reverberatory Furnace
Specification
Wet Scrubber Operating Conditions for Lead Reverberatory Furnace
Specification
Wet Scrubber Cost Data for Lead Reverberatory Furnaces
(LA-Process Weight)
Wet Scrubber Cost Data for Lead Reverberatory Furnaces (High
Efficiency)
Wet Scrubber Process Description for Aluminum Chlorination
Specification
Wet Scrubber Operating Conditions for Aluminum Chlorination
Specification
108
109
123
125
126
128
130
131
133
148
149
150
153
154
155
156
170

-------
INDUSTRIAL GAS CLEANING INSTITUTE, INC.
Page No.
Table 60
Table 61
Table 62
Table 63
Table 64
Table 65
Table 66
Table 67
Table 68
Table 69
Table 70
Table 71
Table 72
Table 73
Table 74
Table 75
Table 76
Table 77
Table 78
Table 79
Table 80
Wet Scrubber Cost Data for Aluminum Chlorination Stations
(LA-Process Weight)
Wet Scrubber Cost Data for Aluminum Chlorination Stations (High
Efficiency)
Derived Cost Indices for Rotary Lime Kilns (Precipitator)
Derived Cost Indices for Rotary Lime Kilns (Fabric Collector and
Scrubber)
Cost in Dollars/SCFM for Rotary Lime Kiln Air Pollution Control
(Precipitator)
Cost in Dollars/SCFM for Rotary Lime Kiln Air Pollution Control
(Fabric Collector and Scrubber)
Derived Cost Indices for Brass/Bronze Reverberatory Furnaces
Cost in Dollars/SCFM for Brass/Bronze Reverberatory Furnaces
Derived Cost Indices for Lead Cupolas
Cost in Dollars/SCFM for Lead Cupolas
Derived Cost Indices for Sweating Furnaces
Cost in Dollars/SCFM for Sweating Furnaces
Derived Cost Indices for Lead Reverberatory Furnaces
Cost in Dollars/SCFM for Lead Reverberatory Furnaces
Derived Cost Indices for Aluminum Chlorination Stations
Cost in Dollars/SCFM for Aluminum Chlorination Stations
Sample "Summary of Installation Data" Form (Pages 1 and 2)
Number of Rotary Lime Kiln Installations by Year Placed in Service
Total Gas Volumes from Rotary Lime Kilns Treated by Year of
Installation
Efficiency Representations Available from Equipment Manufacturers
Properties of Rotary Lime Kiln Dusts from Mechanical Collector
172
173
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
200
202
203
204

Tests

-------
INDUSTRIAL GAS CLEANING INSTITUTE,
Table 81
Table 82
Table 83
Table 84
Table 85
Table 86
Table 87
Table 88
Electrical Resistivity of Dusts from 50 T/D Rotary Lime Kiln
Summary of Installation and Test Data for Rotary Lime Kilns
Summary of Installation and Test Data for Brass/Bronze
Reverberatory Furnaces
Summary of Installation Data for Lead Cupolas
Summary of Installation Data for Sweating Furnaces
Summary of Installation Data for Lead Reverberatory Furnaces
Summary of Installation Data for Zinc Calcination Furnaces
Summary of Installation Data for Aluminum Chlorination Stations
INC.
Page No.
209
210
229
230
236
239
243

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC.
                          LIST OF  APPENDICES
 Appendix I    Program Planning and  Execution






 Appendix II   Detailed Instructions for Preparing Specifications





 Appendix III   Rule 54 of the Air Pollution Control District of Lost Angeles County



 Appendix IV   Sample Specification for Air Pollution Abatement Equipment



 Appendix V   Detailed Instructions for Preparing Bid Price Proposals



 Appendix VI   Detailed Instructions for Listing Installations



 Appendix VII  List of IGCI Publications
Page No.






  249






  259





  265



  269



  277



  283




-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC
       i.
INTRODUCTION
              The  Industrial  Gas  Cleaning Institute (IGCI)  is an  association of
       manufacturers which was created primarily to serve manufacturers of industrial
       gas cleaning  equipment; but  like any organization  with  a worthwhile purpose,
       its efforts are beneficial to others.

              Its activities to develop and  improve standards help  the entire gas
       cleaning  industry. Its work  with technical committees of other  associations
       benefits other industries. Its cooperation with government agencies simplifies
       their tasks.

              Under this contract, members of the  IGCI collected and  formalized
       information  on air  pollution control  for processes in the  lime and secondary
       non-ferrous smelting industries. The specific process areas covered are:

              (1)     Rotary Lime Kilns (other than those in paper mills)
              (2)     Brass and  Bronze Reverberatory Furnaces
              (3)     Lead Cupolas
              (4)     Lead and Aluminum Sweating
              (5)     Lead Reverberatory Furnaces
              (6)     Zinc Calcination
              (7)     Aluminum Chlorination

              Three specific kinds of information are included:

              (1)    Narrative  descriptions  of  the processes in  question,  the
                     associated air pollution control equipment, and the problems
                     special to the processes.

              (2)    The  preparation of   specifications  and  cost  estimates for
                     equipment to serve each of the specified processes.

              (3)    A  tabulation  of the  past installations, and all of the available
                     test data for each of these industries after January 1, 1960.

              All of the data  has been collected and summarized, and should serve as
       a  valuable guide to the air  pollution  abatement methods useful in these
       industries, and to  the costs of air pollution abatement.

              The  industrial areas covered vary from well-defined processes for which
       good  air pollution control systems  are  routinely  available — for  rotary lime
       kilns  —  to  relatively  obscure processes  for  which there is  no established
       approach, as is true of zinc calcination in the secondary metals industry.

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC
              Good test data  is available in  some areas; however,  for many small
       furnace applications, inexpensive fabric filters are supplied on the basis of good
       practical experience, and little test data has been accumulated.

              Little relationship exists between the lime industry and the secondary
       smelting industries. These were lumped together in this contract as a matter of
       convenience  in  the overall  NAPCA program.  Lime producers use  native
       limestone,  oyster shells, and other calcium-rich natural  materials to make
       quicklime.  The product is sold for use in steel making, agriculture and basic
       chemical  manufacture.  Secondary smelters process scrap metals to reclaim
       valuable components which can be resold at a profit.
              There  is a close relationship between lime manufacture for the uses
        included in this contract and lime sludge reburning for paper mills. Lime sludge
        is produced in Kraft mills during the  paper  making process. This material is
        calcined  or  "burned"  in a  kiln  similar  to that used  for  agricultural or
        metallurgical lime,  and requires  similar  air pollution  control equipment.  A
        number  of  member companies  initially  reported  paper mill  applications for
        inclusion in this report because of these similarities.  These have been eliminated
        from this study.

              There  were also some points of  confusion in the smelting industries
        because  of  similarities  between  secondary  processes and  similar primary
        smelting applications. This was true of  the aluminum chlorination application,
        and  particularly of zinc calcination. Most of the latter applications reported by
        members turned out  to be primary production  of zinc oxide. Again, reports
        were carefully screened  to limit applications described to those actually within
        the definition of the program.

              The  industrial areas covered comprise a very limited section of the total
        air pollution control  market. Of the 29  member companies, only nine were
        identified as actively involved  in  servicing  these  industries.  Most  of these
        companies had applications and experience with  rotary lime kilns, while none
        were actively  involved  in zinc calcination  process air  pollution  control. The
        limited experience of the member companies in secondary smelting (as opposed
        to utility power production or ferrous  smelting, for example) appears to relate
        to the small size and diversity of the  secondary smelting applications rather
        than to the lack of need for air pollution control equipment.

              The  program was carried out over a six month period beginning on July
        1, 1970  and terminating with the submission  of this report draft on December
        31,  1970. Several  milestones in  the progress of the program were identified

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS  CLEANING   INSTITUTE,  INC.
                    Event

             Completion of Work Plan
             Completion of Progress Reports:
                    Progress Report No. 1
                    Progress Report No. 2
                    Progress Report No. 3
                    Progress Report No. 4
             Final Report Draft Submission
    Date

July 31, 1970

July 31, 1970
August 31, 1970
September 30, 1970
October 30, 1970
November 30, 1970
              Although  the time period  was shorter than optimum for a program
       involving coordination of the activities of a large group of companies, these
       steps were completed in the allotted time. This required careful planning of the
       details of the program  and  good cooperation  of the member companies
       involved. Appendix I describes the program planning and  execution in some

-------

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE,  INC
       II.     SUMMARY OF TECHNICAL DATA

              This  study  contains  six  process descriptions  for  the process areas
       covered.  These  descriptions  combine  published  material   and  first-hand
       experience  gained  by  the member  companies  in servicing the  industries
       involved.
              Ten equipment specifications were written for air pollution  control
       equipment. Each of  these described  a  typical  installation and specified two
       levels  of  performance  for  each of three  equipment  sizes. In all, 60 price
       quotations were requested.  In addition to the technical specifications for the
       air pollution control equipment, generally acceptable terms and conditions are
       specified. These specifications are based almost entirely on the experience of
       the  member companies. They contain  several  significant items of technical
       interest for each application, including:

              A.     Gas flow vs. furnace size relationship
               B.
Gas conditions and properties at the collector inlet
               C.     Selected minimum quality conditions for some collectors

               D.     Efficiency   levels  and   grain  loadings  for  good  collection
                     (LA-Process Weight) and very good collection (High Efficiency).

               Probably the most significant information presented is the cost figures
        generated  in  response to  the  specifications.  These pertain to  all  60
        specifications, and  give figures for the collection equipment only, the total
        equipment, and the complete turnkey installation. These quotations are based
        entirely on the background of the IGCI members in designing,  building, and
        installing equipment of the types specified.

               This  cost  data was presented  in  three  ways for  convenience  in
        estimating  costs at sizes other than those specified:

               A.     Graphically, on log - log plots of cost vs. furnace size

               B.     Algebraically by fitting a power formula  to the cost —  furnace
                     size relationship, and


-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC.
              In addition to the first costs of equipment, the maintenance costs were
       estimated for each of the cases specified, and the operating horsepower was
       estimated. From  these figures,  the total  annual cost method  (or any other
       sound method) can be used to compare the economics of alternative equipment
       types for the general conditions of this study. Caution is recommended in using
       these numbers for specific applications  rather than estimates tailored to the
       conditions of the installation in question.

              The installations made by the IGCI member companies since January 1,
       1960 were  reported and are  tabulated.  A  total  of 153 installations were
       reported, as follows:
                         Rotary Lime Kilns
                         Brass/Bronze Reverberatory Furnaces
                         Lead Cupolas
                         Lead/Aluminum Sweating Furnaces
                         Lead Reverberatory Furnaces
                         Zinc Calcination Furnaces
                         Aluminum Chlorination Stations
                   79
                   16
                   11
                   18
                   17
                    6
                    6
                                                                153
              Of these, the distribution among equipment types was:
                            Electrostatic    Fabric        Wet      Mechanical
                            Precipitators  Collectors     Scrubbers    Collectors
        Rotary Lime Kilns
        Brass/Bronze
        Lead Cupolas
        Sweating Furnaces
        Lead Reverb.
        Zinc Calcination
        Aluminum Chlor.
18
 9
10
12
17
 5


71
35
 6
 1
 6

 1
 6

55
21
 1
                                                                      22
              Relatively good  test data was reported  for  the  rotary  lime  kilns.
        However, little test information was available for the other applications.

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE,  INC
        III.   TECHNICAL DATA

              This section contains all of the data relative to process requirements,
        typical specifications, costs, and existing installations of air pollution control
        equipment. This  information was generated by the members of the Industrial
        Gas Cleaning Institute who have been active in supplying equipment in the lime
        and secondary non-ferrous metals areas. Editing of this material was done only
        to bring it together in a consistent form for ease of reference.
               A.
GENERAL DESCRIPTION
               The format used  for presentation of  the collected  information was
        chosen to provide a reasonably smooth progression from general descriptive
        material to specific  examples of equipment specification and price data for
        each of the industrial  segments represented  in the study. For each area, the
        following sequence is used in Section B.

                      1.      Description of the process

                             a.   Manufacturing aspects
                             b.   Air pollution control equipment

                      2.      Specifications and Costs

                             a.   Electrostatic precipitators
                             b.   Wet Scrubbers
                             c.   Fabric Collectors

                      3.      Summary comments

               The data is  presented,  in turn for each  of the industrial process
        segments,  and an overall  summary  is presented in  Section  C.  Installations
        completed since January 1, 1960 by the IGCI member companies are tabulated
        in Section D.

               Several points arose during the preparation of this material which merit
        some detailed comment. These involve:

               1.      Selection of applicable equipment types

               2.      Selection of  companies best  qualified  to write  narratives,

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE,  INC
              3.     Selection of emission levels for equipment specifications and
                     bids

              4.     Basis for preparing specifications and bid prices

              These points will be covered in turn in the following
       paragraphs.

              /.     SELECTION OF APPLICABLE EQUIPMENT TYPES

              In general the processes covered by this study are equipped (or should
       be equipped)  with  devices for the removal of particulate matter from the
       effluent discharged into  the air. In  some cases, there is also a requirement for
       removal of a noxious gas such as carbon monoxide from a lead smelting cupola.
       Usually the gaseous pollutant control devices are either built into the smelting
       furnace  — as  is the  case  for the  cupola, or  for smoke  incinerators  in
       reverberatory  furnaces  - or  omitted altogether.  For this reason,  the air
       pollution control equipment considered  in this study is limited to particulate
       collection after the gaseous emissions have been treated.

              One  exception  is taken to this  general  rule. Aluminum chlorination
       stations produce a fume in which aluminum chlorides, oxides and hydroxides
       are emitted  in a stream containing high concentrations of chlorine gas and
       hydrogen chloride gas. The gaseous  constituents here are a major part of the air
       pollution problem, and they are abated by the addition of air pollution control
       equipment, rather than by modification  of the process.  In this case alone the
       requirements for abatement of gaseous constituents are taken into account  in
       selecting  applicable equipment types.

              The emphasis on particulate control equipment in this study should not
       be interpreted as a  bias on the part of  the IGCI  member companies toward
       particulate collection. Rather,  it is an indication  that the specific industrial
       areas covered are far more likely to require "add-on" equipment for collection
       of fumes and dusts than for control  of gaseous emissions.

              The   members   of the  Industrial  Gas  Cleaning  Institute  work
       independently of each other in commercial application of their specific lines of
       equipment. For this reason, unanimity of opinion as to the types of equipment
       applicable to  each  of the industrial areas presented  is  limited to a few
       generalizations.  These  were  formulated  by  the  Engineering  Standards
       Committee, which is the group selected by the president of IGCI to pass upon

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS CLEANING    INSTITUTE, INC
        all public statements of position on technical matters. This group met in Rye,
        New York on August 18, 1970 and agreed upon the following:

               (1)     Mechanical  dust collectors or cyclones would not alone be
        suitable collection devices for any of the specific applications covered. They are
        useful as precleaners in combination with  other, more efficient collectors, and
        in such cases they would be considered as a part of the dust collection system.

               (2)     Electrostatic precipitators  would  ordinarily  be  suitable  for
        collection of  any  of  the particulate matter discharged  from  the  subject
        processes  if the operating conditions were chosen properly. However,  the
        conventional single-stage precipitator is not competitive with fabric filtration or
        wet  scrubbing on a small  scale.  For this reason, precipitators were listed as
        acceptable for only the largest application in this study, the rotary lime kiln. As
        development work  is  done  on  small  electrostatic precipitators, the  cost
        difference .is likely to become  less significant,  and precipitators may  find
        acceptance in some  of the areas from which they are now excluded for reasons
        of high cost.

               (3)     For several application areas, fabric filters predominate over wet
        scrubbers on the basis of both  cost and factors relating to the recovery of the
        particulate  matter in dry form rather than wet.  In these cases, the scrubbers
        may not  be  competitive  for the   average application  but  show cost or
        performance advantages in  a specific circumstance. For this reason the scrubber
        is included for each of the areas.

               (4)     In the  case  of  the  aluminum  chlorination  station,  both
        particulate  collection and  gas absorption are required to provide adequate air
        pollution control. This can be done only by a wet scrubber if the air pollution
        abatement  job must  be  done by  a single piece of equipment.  Only wet
        scrubbing is indicated as an adequate approach, although installations involving
        combinations of equipment can be  made with fabric filters or  electrostatic
        precipitators.

               The  result  of this selection is shown  in  Table  1, which lists  the
        equipment  types considered by  the members of the Engineering Standards
        Committee as acceptable in each area.

               2.      SELECTION  OF COMPANIES  TO  WRITE  NARRATIVES,
                      SPECIFICATIONS AND PREPARE BID PRICE PROPOSALS

-------
                                          Table 1

                    DEFINITION OF COLLECTOR TYPES APPLICABLE  TO

                               VARIOUS INDUSTRIAL AREAS
Collector
Type
Electrostatic
Precipitator
Fabric
Collector
Wet
Scrubber
1.
Lime
Kiln
Yes
Yes
Yes
2.
Brass
Reverb.
No*
Yes
Yes
3.
Lead
Cupola
No*
Yes
Yes
4.
Lead
Sweat.
No*
Yes
Yes
5. 6.
Lead Zinc
Reverb. Calcin.
No* ***
Yes
Yes
4**
Alum.
Sweat.
No*
Yes
Yes
7.
Alum.
Chlor.
No
No
Yes
2* *
Bronze
Reverb.
No*
Yes
Yes
Note that Electrostatic Precipitators  are not applicable to these areas only because the sources are
too small to make precipitator application economical under ordinary circumstances.

These areas were subsequently combined with others, and eliminated from the list (Brass/Bronze and
Lead/Aluminum).


-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC
        equipment for every segment of industry. However, it is unlikely that any one
        of  the companies has covered  all  of the possible applications. In the limited
        area  covered  by  this study,   16  Institute  member companies indicated an
        interest in the industries covered, while  18  of the members indicated at least
        one past application at the beginning of the program*.

               In order to assign the work  on this project equitably among those
        members who have taken an active interest in the lime kiln or secondary metals
        area  covered  by  this program, the members were surveyed  for  interest  in
        participating  in  regard to each  industrial  segment, and on the number of
        applications of equipment made by each.  The survey forms, etc. are included in
        Appendix I of this report. The results of these two surveys were used by the
        Engineering Standards Committee to select companies for participation in each
        area.  The  companies  selected  in each of  the  categories  included three
        participants and two alternates wherever possible. In a few areas there were not
        five companies actively involved. The five companies are listed alphabetically in
        each category in Table 2.

               Failure of a company to appear on this list does not necessarily indicate
        lack  of interest or ability on the part of a particular supplier of equipment. The
        interest  of each  company  in  participating in this program was taken  into
        account to a significant extent in selecting the companies to be involved.

               A further reduction in the number  of companies actually involved  in
        preparation of the narratives,  specifications and bid prices took place on the
        basis of availability of the member's time.

               The specifications were drafted at a  Seminar-Workshop session held  in
        Detroit, Michigan  on September  2 and 3,  1970. At this  meeting, the basic
        requirements  of  the program were  reviewed  with representatives of the
        participating companies, and first draft specifications were prepared by groups
        shown  in Table 3. The specification drafts prepared in Detroit were reviewed
        and  edited by  the Coordinating  Engineer,  and then distributed to selected
        companies for preparation of bid prices.

               One person was selected to prepare the process description in each case,
        and a portion of the  Detroit workshop was  devoted to a technical interchange
        *lt should  be noted that the number here does not agree precisely with the
        number of  companies who  reported on installations during the project. Some
        distinctions, such as the exclusion  of paper mill applications in this study,
        were originally overlooked.


-------
ro
                                                               Table 2
                            SELECTION OF PARTICIPANTS IN NARRATIVE  AND SPECIFICATION  WRITING
                    Lime
                     Kiln

                American
                 Standard

                Ducon

                Fuller
 Brass/Bronze
   Reverb.

American Air
 Filter

Ducon

Fuller
   Lead
  Cupola

American Air
 Filter

Chemico

Fuller
Lead/Alum.
  Sweat.
    Lead
  Reverb.
American Air  Ducon
 Filter
Buell

Fuller
  Zinc
 Calcin.

Buell
  Alum.
  Chlor.

Fuller
Fuller            Fuller    MikroPul

Research-Cottrell  Koppers  UOP
                Research-Cottrell  Research-Cottrell   Research-Cottrell Environeering
                Western
                 Precip.

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE, INC
                                      Table 3







                          Participants in Specification Writing




                                Seminar and Workshop









        Herbert R. Herington — IGCI Project Director




        L. C. Hardison — IGCI Coordinating Engineer




        Harry Krockta, Chairman — Engineering Standards Committee




        Ralph R. Calaceto - MikroPul




        E. R. Gibbs- Koppers




        Raymond B. Hunter — American Air Filter Company




        Morris Mennell — Koppers




        Robert Peden — Western Precipitation




        A. R. Pike — UOP Air Correction Division




        William J. Rudy — Ducon Company




        J. J. Sheehan — Buell Engineering Company




        Harold Treichler - Fuller Company




        Robert J. Wright - Fuller Company

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE,  INC.
        between the participants. The individuals selected to prepare the narratives are
        listed in Table 4.

               The narrative drafts were prepared subsequent to the Detroit Workshop
        and were then edited  by  the Coordinating Engineer and reviewed by all the
        participants in the industry group prior to the final draft.

               3.     SELECTION  OF EMISSION  LEVELS FOR EQUIPMENT
                     SPECIFICA TIONS AND BIDS

               The degree of reduction in the amount of dust discharged into the air
        has  a  large  influence over the design and the  cost of wet  scrubbing and
        electrostatic  precipitation equipment. The  cost of these  increases  sharply as
        efficiency requirements approach 100%.  Costs of fabric filters, on the other
        hand, are not very sensitive to the efficiency level specified.

               In  order   to  make  a  reasonable  comparison  between   the  three
        alternatives,  it is necessary  to establish the required performance  level. The
        local conditions surrounding  a particular installation dictate the performance
        requirements which should be  specified,  and equipment should never be
        acquired without  a thorough knowledge of the local requirements.

               For the purposes of this project, two  arbitrary levels  of performance
        were established, and equipment costs prepared for each:

               (a)     Conformance  with the  present  Los Angeles  Air Pollution
                     Control District process weight  requirements, and

               (b)     Reduction  to a low concentration of paniculate matter which
                     should show little or no visible color in the stack discharge.

               It is emphasized that these are arbitrary performance levels chosen for
        illustrative  purposes in this study. While the first efficiency level is acceptable
        throughout  much  of  the United States,  and the second level  should be
        acceptable   almost  anywhere, no  specifications for air  pollution  control
        equipment should be written  without  a good understanding of all of the local
        requirements.

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING    INSTITUTE,  INC.
                                     Table 4
                       Participants in Process Narrative Writing
       1.
       2.
       3.
       4.
       5.
       6.
       7.
Rotary Lime Kilns
       William J. Rudy - The Ducon Company

Brass/Bronze Reverberatory Furnaces
       Raymond B. Hunter — American Air Filter Co.

Lead Cupola
       L. C. Hardison — Air Resources (for Research-Cottrell)

Lead/Aluminum Sweating Furnace
       Harold Treichler — Fuller Company

Lead Reverberatory Furnace
       L. C. Hardison — Air Resources (for Research-Cottrell)

Zinc Calcination
       Morris Mennell — Koppers

Aluminum Chlorination Station
       A. R. Pike - UOP Air Correction

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE,  INC.
               The LA-Process Weight Specification is typical of many such ordinances
        throughout the country. It  is based on an allowable emission  of particulate
        matter which increases with  process feed rate. However, the allowable emission
        rate in pounds per hour of particulate increases more slowly than does the feed
        rate  to the process.  Because the  emission  produced  in most  processes is
        proportional to the  feed  rate, the particulate collection efficiency must be
        higher for large processes than for small ones. The law also specifies an absolute
        maximum of 40 Ib/hr of particulate matter, regardless of process  size, so that
        very  large process units must have very efficient collection devices. Most of the
        processes covered  by this study are  relatively small in terms of total feed rate,
        and the 40 Ib/hr maximum emission level is not usually applicable for the lime
        kilns or secondary smelters.

               A  list  of  allowable emission  rates  under  the  LA-Process Weight
        regulation is given in Table  5. A more detailed version of Rule 54 of the Air
        Pollution Control  District of  Los Angeles County is given in Appendix III.

               In general, this type of regulation is  easy  to  interpret and leads to
        definite,  clear-cut levels of performance  required  for  air pollution control
        systems,  provided  the rate  at which particulate  matter is generated by the
        process and  the   process feed  rate (or  process weight) are  known. The
        particulate emission rate is best obtained by direct measurement by a qualified
        source test engineer or company if the process is an existing one, or obtained
        from  the  manufacturer of  the furnace or kiln if the  installation is in the
        planning stage. The process weight is the sum of all of the feed materials to the
        process, excluding air and liquid or gaseous fuels. The process weight ordinarily
        exceeds the rated product capacity of the equipment because it includes output
        product, plus losses and byproducts.

               The second specification  included for each of the air pollution control
        systems covered  by  this report  is  called the "High  Efficiency" case. This is
        taken as an arbitrary stack grain loading (concentration of particulate matter,
        measured  in grains per actual  cubic foot)  which  should  produce an effluent
        with  little or no visible opacity, excluding that due to water. This grain loading
        is  based  on the  best judgment of the members  of  the IGCI  Engineering
        Standards Committee. The  levels  specified  are  arbitrary,  and  while  most
        member companies will guarantee performance to the grain loading specified,
        they  will not ordinarily represent or guarantee freedom from visible emissions.
        (Exceptions to  this  rule   exist.  A  manufacturer  may have  an  identical
        installation known to produce a  color-free effluent and be willing to guarantee
        performance on this basis.) Table 6  lists the values assigned by the Engineering
        Standards Committee to this  "High  Efficiency" case.

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC.
                          Table 5
                LA-PROCESS WEIGHT AND ALLOWANCE EMISSION
•Process
Wt.'hr(lbs)
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
650
700
750
800
850
900
950
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
1800
1900
2000
2100
2200
2300
2400
2500
2600
2700
2800
2900
3000
3100
3200
3300
•See Definition
Maximum Weight 'Process
Disch/hr(lbs) Wt/hr(lbs)
.24
.46
.66
.85
1 ..03
1.20
1.35
1.50
1.63
1.77
1.89
2.01
2.12
2.24
2.34
2.43
2.53
2.62
2.72
2. 80
2.97
3.12
3.26
3.40
3.54
3.66
3.79
3.91
4.03
4. 14
4.24
4.34
4.44
4.55
4.64
4.74
4.84
4.92
5.02
5.10
5.18
5.27
5.36
3400
3500
3600
3700
3800
3900
4000
4100
4200
4300
4400
4500
4600
4700
4800
4900
5000
5500
6000
6500
7000
7500
8000
8500
9000
9500
10000
11000
12000
13000
14000
15000
16000
17000
18000
19000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
or
more
i n Ru 1 e 2 ( j ) .
Maximum We i gh t
Disch /hr( 1 bs)
5.44
5.52
. 5.61
5.69
5.77
5.85
5.93
6.01
6.08
6.15
6.22
6.30
6.37
6.45
6.52
6.60
6.67
7.03
7.37
7.71
8.05
8.39
8.71
9.03
9.36
9.67
10.0
10.63
11.28
11.89
12.50
13.13
13.74
14.36
14.97
15.58
16.19
22.22
28.3
34.3
40.0




-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC.
                                     Table 6



                       Definition of Outlet Grain Loadings  For

                             High Efficiency Level Bids
            Rotary  Lime Kilns

            Brass Reverberatory Furnaces

            Lead Cupolas

            Lead Sweating Furnaces

            Lead Reverberatory Furnaces


            Zinc Calcination Furnaces

            Aluminum Sweating Furnaces

            Aluminum Chlorination Stations


            Bronze Reverberatory Furnaces
 Outlet
Loading
gr/ACF

 0.03

 0.01

 0.03

 0.03

 0.01

 0.01

 0.03

 0.02

 0.03

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE,  INC
              This table shows these  loadings  in  gr/ACF  at  the stack  discharge
       because they correlate with the opacity of the plume better than gr/SCF. Most
       frequently, measurements of particulate loading are reported in gr/SCF and the
       conversion of this value to gr/ACF should not be overlooked. Also, it  should be
       noted that very large diameter stacks are likely to show a more visible plume at
       the same grain loading than small stacks.

              4.     BASIS  FOR   PREPARING   SPECIFICATIONS  AND  BID
                     PRICES

              Several   simplicications  were  made in  the  preparation  of  the
       specifications which have some bearing on the results which are reported here.
       These should be kept in mind when using the prices, operating costs, etc.

              The form  of  the specification for equipment may have an  influence
       over the price quoted. Overly-restrictive specifications may add 5 - 10% to the
       equipment price  without a corresponding increase in value received by the
       purchaser.  In each of the cases presented in this report, prices are based on a
       specification which covers most  of the conditions of purchase in an  equitable
       way.  Instead of writing each  specification  independently, the participants in
       the Detroit workshop agreed  upon  the  general terms and  conditions to be
       specified, and these conditions were made identical for each specification. The
       final specification  in  each case was made by  inserting one page  of descriptive
       material  and one page  of operating conditions  pertaining to the specific
       application into the standard format. To avoid unnecessary  repetition, a sample
       of the complete  specification for one of the six  applications is included as
       Appendix IV to this  report. Only the pages pertinent to specific applications
       are contained in the body of the report.

              Prices were requested in such a way as to indicate three bases:

              (a)    Air pollution control  device. This includes only the  flange-to-
                     flange  precipitator, fabric collector, or  scrubber.

              (b)    Air pollution  control system  equipment. This includes major
                     items such as  fans, pumps,  etc.

              (c)    Complete turnkey  installation.  This includes the design, all
                     materials  and  equipment  and startup.

              In order to maintain a  consistent approach to quoting in  each area, the
       specifications were written around the air pollution control device.  The process
       description was, however, made general enough to allow the members to quote
       on  the auxiliary equipment, such as  fans, pumps, solid handling devices, etc.,
       and  to  quote  on an  approximate  installation cost.  A complete  set  of

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS CLEANING    INSTITUTE, INC.
       instructions for preparing specifications and for quoting are given in Appendix
       II and Appendix V.

              Labor costs are a variable from one location to another, and it was not
       possible to establish the complex pattern of variations in turnkey prices which
       occurs as a function  of  local variations  in  hourly  rate, productivity  and
       availability of construction tradesmen. In order to provide a consistent basis for
       the preparation of price quotations, the cost indices given in Table 7 were used.
       This was taken from  "Building Construction  Cost  Data, 1970".* This gives a
       construction cost index for  90 cities,  using  100  to  represent  the national
       average.  These  figures are for the  building  trades, but  they should  be
       representative of field construction rates in general.

              These figures  do not take productivity differences into  account  and
       may understate the variations in cost from one city to another.

              The  participating companies were instructed to estimate the installation
       costs as though erection or installation of the system would be in Milwaukee,
       Wisconsin or another  city relatively convenient to the participants point of
       shipment with a labor rate near 100. Readers are cautioned to take local labor
       rates and productivity into account when making first estimates of air pollution
       control  system  installed costs based on the data in  this report. Table 8 shows
       the tabulated hourly rates for various construction trades (based on national
       averages) which may be useful for this purpose.*
              B.
NARRATIVE DESCRIPTIONS AND COSTS
              The  following sections  include all  of  the  descriptive and  cost  data
       developed by the participating member  companies.  A  separate  section is
       devoted to each of the application areas:

                     1.      Rotary Lime Kilns (other than paper mill)

                     2.      Brass/Bronze Reverberatory Furnaces

                     3.      Lead Cupolas

                     4.      Lead/Aluminum Sweating Furnaces
        "Godfrey, Robert  Sturgis, "Building Construction Cost Data," Robert Snow
        Means Co., Inc., Box G, Duxbury, Mass. 02332

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC.
                    5.     Lead Reverberatory Furnaces

                    6.     Zinc Calcination Furnaces

                    7.     Aluminum Chlorination Stations

             Past installation data is collected in a separate section, with a discussion
       of the application pattern.

-------
INDUSTRIAL  GAS CLEANING  INSTITUTE, INC
                        Table 7
                    CITY COST INDICES
Average 1969 Construction Cost & Labor Indexes
City
Albany, N.Y.
Albuquerque, N.M
Amarillo, Tx.
Anchorage, Ak.
Atlanta, Ga.
Baltimore, Ma1.
Baton Rouge, La.
Birmingham, Al.
Boston, Ma.
Bridgeport, Ct.
Buffalo, N.Y.
Burlington, Vt.
Charlotte, N.C.
Chattanooga, Tn.
Chicago, III.
Cincinnati, Oh.
Cleveland, Oh.
Columbus, Oh.
Dallas, Tx.
Dayton, Oh.
Denver, Co.
Des Moines, la.
Detroit, Mi.
Edmonton, Cn.
El Paso, Tx.
Erie, Pa.
Evansville, In.
Grand Rapids, Mi.
Harrisburg, Pa.
Hartford, Ct.
Honolulu, Hi.
Houston, Tx.
Indianapolis, In.
Jackson, Ms.
Jacksonville, Fl.
Kansas City, Mo.
Knoxville, Tn.
Las Vegas, Nv.
Little Rock, Ar.
Los Angeles, Ca.
Louisville, Ky.
Madison, Wi.
Manchester, N.H.
Memphis,- Tn.
Miami, Fl.
Index
Labor
98
86
87
131
88
90
83
79
106
104
104
86
70
81
107
108
121
106
86
100
94
93
117
80
77
98
93
103
90
104
99
92
97
73
78
94
82
115
78
113
92
95
89
83
98
Total
100
95
84
148
94
93
88
86
103
102
107
90
75
84
103
104
112
99
89
103
91
96
111
83
83
99
97
99
92
100
109
89
98
75
79
93
82
107
81
102
93
98
92
82
94
City
Milwaukee, Wi.
Minneapolis, Mn.
Mobile, Al.
Montreal, Cn.
Nashville, Tn.
Newark, N.J.
New Haven, Ct.
New Orleans, La.
New York, N.Y.
Norfolk, Va.
Oklahoma City, Ok.
Omaha, Nb.
Philadelphia, Pa.
Phoenix, Az.
Pittsburgh, Pa.
Portland, Me.
Portland, Or.
Providence, R.I.
Richmond, Va.
Rochester, N.Y.
Rockford, III.
Sacramento, Ca.
St. Louis, Mo.
Salt Lake City, Ut.
San Antonio, Tx.
San Diego, Ca.
San Francisco, Ca.
Savannah, Ga.
Scranton, Pa.
Seattle, Wa.
Shreveport, La.
South Bend, In.
Spokane, Wa.
Springfield, Ma.
Syracuse, N.Y.
Tampa, Fl.
Toledo, Oh.
Toronto, Cn.
Trenton, N.J.
Tulsa, Ok.
Vancouver, Cn.
Washington, D.C.
Wichita, Ks.
Winnipeg, Cn.
Youngstown, Oh.
Index
Labor
103
99
94
77
79
122
102
89
132
73
82
90
106
101
no
82
102
98
76
110
109
117
110
93
82
111
124
72
94
104
82
99
101
99
105
81
105
84
114
85
81
98
85
62
107
Total
108
98
90
89
82
109
100
95
118
77
88
93
101
97
106
87
103
97
79
107
109
110
103
95
82
107
109
77
96
99
89
97
100
97
103
84
105
93
103
89
91
94
90
82
106
Historical Average
Year
1969
1968
1967
1966
1965
1964
1963
1962
1961
1960
1959
1958
1957
1956
1955
1954
1953
1952
1951
1950
1949
1948
1947
1946
1945
1944
1943
1942
1941
1940
1939
1938
1937
1936
1935
1934
1933
1932
1931
1930
1929
1928
1927
1926
1925
1924
Index
100
91
86
83
79
78
76
74
72
71
69
67
65
63
59
58
57
55
53
49
48
48
43
35
30
29
29
28
25
24
23
23
23
20
20
20
18
17
20
22
23
23
23
23
23
23

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS  CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC.
                           Table 8
             AVERAGE HOURLY LABOR RATES BY TRADE
Trade
Common Building Labor
Sk i 1 led Average
Helpers Average
Foremen (usually 35<£ over trade)
Bricklayers
Bricklayers Helpers
Carpenters
Cement F inishers
E lectr ic ians
G laz iers
Hoist Engineers
Lathers
Marble & Terrazzo Workers
Pa inters, Ord inary
Painters, Structural Steel
Paperhangers
P iasterers
P Iasterers He Ipers
P lumbers
Power Shovel or Crane Operator
Rodmen (Reinforcing)
Roofers, Composition
Roofers, T He & Slate
Roofers Helpers (Composition)
Steamfitters
Spr ink ler Insta 1 Iers
! Structural Steel Workers
! Tile Layers (F loor)
T ile Layers Helpers -
Truck Drivers
Welders, Structural Steel
1970
$5.00
6.85
5.15
7.20
7.15
5.20
6.95
6.75
7.50
6.25
7.05
6.60
6.45
6.20
6.50
6.30
6.60
5.30
7.75
7.20
7.30
6.30
6.35
4.75
7.70
7.70
7.45
6.50
5.25
5.15
7.15
1969
$4.55
6.05
4.65
6.40
6.40
4.70
6.15
5.90
6.45
5.50
5.90
5.95
5.60
5.45
5.80
5.60
5.95
4.85
6.90
6.20
6.35
5.55
5.60
4.45
6.90
6.90
6.45
5.60
4.80
4.60
6.35
1968
$4.10
5.50
4.20
5.85
5.85
4.30
5.40
5.30
5.95
5.10
5.40
5.45
5.25
5.05
5.30
5.15
5.50
4.45
6.15
5.65
5.80
5.05
5.10
4.00
6.10
6.10
5.90
5.20
4.35
4.30
5.80
1967
$3.85
5.15
4.00
5.50
5.55
4.05
5.10
5.05
5.60
4.75
5.10
5.20
5.05
4.75
4.95
4.75
5.15
4.15
5.75
5.35
5.45
4.75
4.85
3.75
5.70
5.70
5.55"
4.90
4.15
3.95
5.45
1966
$3.65
4.90 |
3.85
5.25 i
5.35
3.95
4.90
4.85
5.45
4.60
4.85
5.05
4.90
4.50
4.80
4.55
5.00
4.00
5.55
5.05
5.15
4.65
4.80
3.55
5.50
5.50
5.25
4.80
4.05
3.65
5.10

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC
       1.
AIR POLLUTION CONTROL FOR ROTARY LIME KILNS
              a.
       PROCESS DESCRIPTION
              1)
       MANUFACTURING ASPECTS
              On the basis of the best estimates available, 80-90% of lime production
       in  the  U. S. is in rotary  kilns. The kiln is a furnace made of steel lined with
       refractory brick, and fired by any one of three available fuels; natural gas,
       pulverized coal or oil, or by a combination of these fuels.

              The  raw materials  for  lime  manufacturing are essentially  calcium
       carbonate (limestone) or calcium magnesium carbonate (dolomite or dolomitic
       limestone),  with  varied  amounts of impurities. If the magnesium-carbonate is
       less  than  5%,  the limestone  is  referred   to as  high  calcium.  If the
       magnesium-carbonate content  is  30-40%,  it  is referred  to  as  dolomitic
       limestone. Lime  is  produced  by heating  sized  limestone to decompose the
       carbonate releasing C02 and leaving the calcium  oxide as the product. During
       the heating process, moisture and volatile organic matter are driven off. Then at
       higher temperatures decomposition of the carbonate begins. Rotary lime kilns
       are basically heat exchangers and conveyors. The flow of stone and combustion
       products is counter-current through the kiln. Figure  1  indicates the basic flow
       of solids and  combustion  products  through  a kiln  and the  associated air
       pollution control equipment.

                                    EQUIPMENT

              Rotary kilns are of two basic  types; the "long  rotary  kiln"  and the
       "short  rotary kiln with external pre-heater". (In this report, the specification
       was based on the "long  rotary kiln".) Long rotary  kilns generally have exit
       gases in the 1100 - 1400°F temperature range,  while short rotary kilns with
       pre-heaters generally run between 1700 and 2100° F. For the short rotary kilns
       acceptable feed sizes are  more limited than for  the long rotary  kilns. Space
       requirements for  the pre-heater systems are less.

              Pre-heater equipped kilns are particularly successful when they have
       contact type coolers and soaking pits. The application  of pre-heater systems is
       limited to feed materials which do not degrade during calcining.

              Rotary kilns are available to handle capacities from 50 tons  per day
       (which is unusually small) up to 650 tons per day. This maximum tonnage will
       probably go to  a  much higher  rate in  the  future  although the largest

-------
 NATURAL
   GAS
 AND AIR
ro
01
                 CONTACT
                 COOLER
                                         LIMESTONE
                                           FEED
       FABRIC
      COLLECTOR
                                                         YY
                                                           FINES
FINES
                                       Figure 1


-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC
        commercial installation at this date is 650 TPD. Kilns vary in size from 6 feet
        to 12 feet in diameter and up to 400 feet in length.

               At the feed end of the  kiln hot gases are cooled by  pre-heating  the
        stone, while at the other end the kiln discharges the lime quite hot. For this
        reason, product coolers are usually provided to pre-heat the combustion  air.
        Heat efficiency may sometimes be improved through the use of chain sections
        and  pre-heating tubes at the feed end.

               As long as the  feed size range is narrow and the minimum size is about
        1/2", good mixing takes  place in the bed and produces a very uniform lime.
        However this bed  motion also contributes to abrasion and dust formation and
        gives rise to the need for efficient dust collection equipment.

               The efficiency  of dust collection required varies  with the feed size and
        stone quality, as well as with discharge gas concentration limits. Large systems
        are  generally  required  because  gas volumes are  high; tempering with air or
        quenching with water may be required, and both of these contribute additional
        gas volume. Two collection stages are common. Sludge kilns with fine feed sizes
        have highest dust loadings in the exit gases.

               Product cooling equipment used with rotary kilns is generally of two
        types, either satellite  coolers for finer  materials or  contact type coolers  for
        coarse lime. Satellite coolers are less effective but involve less maintenance and
        operating costs  than contact coolers. Contact coolers  result in considerably
        better  fuel consumption  but  have  higher operating  costs  and headroom
        requirements.  Rotary coolers  and grate type coolers are secondary choices in
        the lime industry.

               Although rotary kilns have a much higher fuel consumption than shaft
        kilns or other calcining systems, the majority of U. S.  lime plants use the rotary
        kilns. The main reasons for the selection  of rotary kilns are:

        1.      Can handle a wider range of feed sizes

        2.      Can use all three major fuels singly or in combination

        3.      Are easily controlled and can be fully automated

        4.      Can handle smaller feed sizes than shaft kilns

        5.      Can produce a uniform product in practically any desired quality over a

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE, INC.
               wide range of product grades. This is because of the ease of control and
               good mixing in the bed

        6.      Can operate at high capacity with great operating flexibility
               There are some disadvantages, however:

        1.      Rotary kilns require more space, especially if they are not equipped
               with pre-heat systems

        2.      The first cost is higher than most other systems

        3.      They have higher fuel consumption

        4.      They are especially uneconomical for low capacities

        5.      The refractory cost is higher because of the possible movement of the
               refractory within the kiln shell. Stresses are imposed on the refractory
               which do not exist in a stationary kiln.

                                  FEED MATERIALS

               The carbonates of calcium or magnesium are obtained from deposits of
        limestone, marble, chalk, dolomite or oyster shells. Although  limestone is the
        usual raw material for manufacture of lime, some of the operations use oyster
        shells. This is particularly true in the Gulf Coast area. Limestone deposits exist
        in every State in the  U. S., but only a small portion  is of sufficient purity for
        industrial use. For chemical usage, a rather pure  limestone is preferred as a
        starting material because of the high calcium lime that results. The lower grades
        are generally suitable for agricultural purposes. Table 9 gives some typical feed
        compositions.

               More than 90% of the limestone quarried is from open pit operations
        with the remainder from underground mines. The quarries are generally chosen
        which furnish a rock that contains a low percentage of impurities such as silica,
        clay or iron.

               The limestone feed to the kilns consists of stone sizes between 1/4" and
        2".  In  general for most applications, however, the feed  is maintained in the
        1/4"- 1/2" size range.

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC.
                                 Table 9
                   TYPICAL ANALYSIS OF COMMERCIAL
                HIGH CALCIUM AND DOLOMITIC LIMESTONE
      Calcium Carbonate (CaC03)

      Magnesium Carbonate (MgCOg)

      Iron Oxide
      Aluminum Oxide

      Silica (Si02) + acid insolubles

      Loss on ignition
                                             High Calcium     Dolomitic
                                                       Wt. %
97.40

 1.25

 0.11

 0.35

 0.95

43.40
52.34

47.04

 0.04

 0.20

 0.26

47.67

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE,  INC
                                    PRODUCTS

              Limestone and lime are employed  in more industries than any other
       natural substance. Lime is second only to sulfuric acid in tonnage production
       among the pure chemicals. Lime  is usually sold as a high calcium quick lime
       containing not less than 90% of calcium oxide. Other constituents are magnesia
       (0-5%)  and  small  percentages of  calcium  carbonate,  silica,  alumina  and
       ferric-oxide impurities. The suitability of a lime for any particular use depends
       on its  composition and physical  properties.  These can  be controlled by the
       selection of the limestone and the detail of the manufacturing process.

              Many chemical and metallurgical processes require high calcium lime. In
       sulfite paper processing, however, a magnesia lime works better. Other uses of
       lime include air and water pollution control.  Lime slurries have been  used for
       scrubbing of stack gases to remove HCI, HF, S02, etc.

              There  are many municipalities which  use lime softening in their water
       treatment plants.  The acidity of industrial waste water is effectively controlled
       by the use of lime as a reagent.

                               PROCESS CHEMISTRY

              There  are  three  essential  factors  in  the kinetics of  limestone's
       decomposition:

         (a)   The stone must  be heated  to the  dissociation temperature of the
       carbonates.  For calcite (CaCOg)  this temperature is approximately 1648°F
       while  dolomite  (CaCO3' MgCO^) dissociates in the range  of 930-1480° F.
       Because MgCOg  dissociates at a  much lower temperature (755-895° F) than
       CaCOg,  the  dissociation temperature  for  the  mixture varies with  the
       proportions of MgCOg. The heat consumed to attain the theoretical minimum
       dissociation temperature is approximately 1.5 million Btu/ton high calcium
       quicklime and 1.25 million Btu/ton dolomitic quicklime produced.

         (b)   The dissociation temperature must be maintained until all of the carbon
       dioxide is expelled. The heat requirement during  this period is approximately
       2.8 million Btu/ton high calcium quicklime and 2.6 million Btu/ton dolomitic
       quicklime produced.

         (c)   The carbon dioxide gas must be removed to keep  recarbonation to a
       minimum because of the reversible nature of the dissociation reaction.

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING   INSTITUTE,  INC.
                        NATURE OF THE AIR POLLUTANTS

              The nature of air pollutants emitted from rotary lime kilns is a function
       of the type of limestone charged  (high  calcium or dolomitic)  and the type of
       fuel burned (coal, oil or natural gas).

              The  gaseous  effluent is  usually  between 800 and  1800° F.  It is
       composed of carbon dioxide, water vapor and nitrogen. Sulfur dioxide and
       sulfur trioxide are also present if sulfur-containing oil or coal are used as fuels.

              The composition and volume of gases discharged from rotary lime kilns
       varies  with  the  type  of limestone feed, the  fuel  used,  completeness of
       combustion, quantity of excess air, etc.

              An approximate relationship between gas flow and process weight is
       presented in  Table  10. This is influenced  by the fuel  composition to some
       degree. Natural gas and pulverized coal  represent the major fuel types used in
       this  application. Other fuels utilized to a  minor degree in rotary lime  kilns
       include fuel oil, wood, sawdust and propane. However, these fuels are usually
       uneconomical,  unavailable  or  unsuitable  because   of  poor combustion
       characteristics.

              A typical overall kiln exhaust gas composition is as follows:

                     N2                 -        59.7%  (by vol.)
C02

H20

^Jo
                                                  24.3%

                                                  15.3%

                                                   0.7%

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC
                                  Table 10
               Typical Exhaust Gas Production for Various Kiln Sizes

                            EXHAUST GAS, SCFM
        Process Wt.
         Tons Lime
      Produced per Day


           125

           250

           500
  Gas
 Fired
  Kiln
11,000

26,600

46,900
       Fuel/Lime Ratio
       Coal Fired Kiln
 1:3


 8800

17600

35200
 1:4


 6900

13800

27600
 1:5


 5700

11400

22800

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC
               The CC>2  content  of lime  kiln gases  is relatively high because the
        exhaust  gases   contain  CC>2  released  during  the  chemical  reaction
        (limestone-Hime) as well as the CC>2 resulting from combustion of the fuel.

               Minor gaseous contaminants include SC^, SOg and oxides of nitrogen,
        in  concentrations  which depend  upon the type of fuel  used. For instance,
        virtually no SC>2 or SOg is present in the exhaust gases from a kiln fired with
        natural gas, while concentrations of S02 in the range of 0.05 - 0.3% (by vol.)
        occur with coal firing. Oxides of nitrogen  (NOX) are present in  combustion
        gases from the burning of natural gas, coal or fuel oil in concentrations of 100
        ppm to 1400 ppm.

               The paniculate  emissions can include raw  limestone and completely
        calcined lime dust, fly ash, tars and unburned carbon (if pulverized coal is used
        as the fuel). The quantity of dust emitted from a rotary lime kiln can be as high
        as 15% of the product lime weight.

               The particulate emissions from rotary lime kilns can be in the range of
        2 -  20 gr/scf with  typical chemical analyses from gas fired kilns as shown in
        Table 11.

               The calcination  or thermal decomposition of high  calcium limestone
        (CaCOg)  or dolomitic  limestone (CaCOg • MgCOg) proceeds in accordance
        with the following  reversible reactions:

        1.      CaCO3 + heat ^ CaO (quicklime) + C02  t

        2.      CaC03 • MgC03 + heat + CaO • MgO (dolomitic quicklime) + 2 C02

               2)      Air Pollution Control Equipment

               The kiln exhaust gases represent the single largest  source of airborne
        particulate matter in the lime industry. The major contaminant is quicklime
        dust caused by the abrasion of the stone in the kiln. The stone becomes friable
        as  it approaches the decomposition temperature and dusting occurs. The lime
        dust presents a difficult control problem as it is hot, dry and not easy to wet. It
        is a dust of mixed composition varying all  the way  from the raw limestone to
        final completely calcined products. It will also be mixed with flyash, tars, and
        unburned carbon if pulverized coal is the fuel.  The dust control  problem is
        much more critical with  rotary limestone kilns since recirculation  of  hot
        exhaust gases is not practical after pre-heating the kiln feed.

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC
                                    Table 11
                  Typical Chemical Analysis of Lime Kiln Emissions
Component
CaO
CaCO3
Ca(OH}2
MgO
CaSO4
Other
High Calcium
66.3
23.1
6.4
1.4
1.2
1.6
                                                                Dolomitic

                                                                   7.2

                                                                  64.3



                                                                  28.2

                                                                    .3
             If pulverized coal  is used as a fuel, the particulates would also include
       flyash  (consisting  mostly of the oxides of silicon, aluminum and  iron) and
       soot and tars resulting from incomplete combustion.

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE, INC
               The  approach that has been taken  in  the  selection  of gas  cleaning
        equipment on existing installations has  been  made strictly on the ability of the
        equipment to remove the particulates.

               In recent years, however, there  has been an increase in the concern for
        effective  control of gaseous emission (S02, SOg and NOX) but this has not yet
        become a major consideration  in the selection of dust control equipment. The
        emission  of  lime dust has been considered mainly a nuisance rather than one
        creating a health hazard.

               The total quantity of dust discharged from the kiln ranges from 5-15%
        of the weight of the  lime produced. Exhaust gas temperatures will range from
        800° to 1800° F.  It has also been established that the dust concentration will
        increase as the gas volume increases under conditions when the kiln capacity is
        pushed. An  increase in production rate  from  100  to 135  percent of design
        capacity could double the quantity of dust discharged.

               The gases leaving the kiln are usually first passed through  a dust settling
        chamber  where the coarser material settles out. On  many installations, a first
        stage primary dry cyclone collector is used to collect a large percentage of the
        coarse material. This primary collector stage, therefore, consists either of a low
        efficiency dust  chamber  or  a  high  efficiency  dry cyclone.  The  removal
        efficiency (by weight) at this stage can  vary anywhere from 25% to 85% of the
        dust being discharged from the  kiln.

               The lime dust collected in this primary stage is taken to a waste dump,
        used as land fill or used for agricultural land  treatment. The inclusion of a first
        stage depends on two considerations: (1)  whether or not the coarse lime has a
        resale value,  and (2) whether the kiln operation or the feed material (the stone)
        will create higher than normal  kiln outlet loadings. If the loading  is estimated
        to be higher than the  5-15%  figure, a primary cyclone should be seriously
        considered to alleviate  the operating and maintenance problems that go with
        high loadings.   This  is  especially  true in the  case of  wet  scrubbers since
        extremely high loadings could increase the potential material build-up in the
        collector  and also impose a heavy load on the  slurry disposal system.

               The  selection of the second stage or  final  dust collector depends on a
        variety of factors.  On the basis of overall collection efficiency only, at the high
        efficiency level in this  study  (.03 grains/ACF) any one of the  three major
        categories of collection equipment, (wet scrubber, fabric filter or  electrostatic
        precipitator)  could be  selected  and  achieve  the required stack control on
        particulate emission.  At the lower efficiency  (LA-Process Weight) a single stage

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING   INSTITUTE,  INC.
       medium  pressure drop  scrubber  could  be selected and  would carry a total
       installed  cost figure  somewhat less than what would be required for the high
       efficiency  scrubbers  (Venturi  or two   stage  dynamic). Depending  upon
       equipment size, this difference could be  only marginal and it may  be more
       practical   to  select  a  higher efficiency  system  even in areas where code
       requirements are not very  stringent. The  high efficiency wet  scrubber  is the
       logical choice if the wet scrubber is selected.

              The selection of the type  of gas cleaning  equipment must be based on
       consideration of several  factors in addition to efficiency. In order to determine
       what  kind of collector (wet scrubber, fabric filter, electrostatic) best suits the
       particular application and the compliance with local air pollution codes, one
       must  evaluate capital equipment costs; codes; operating and maintenance costs;
       water availability; horsepower requirements;  in the case of fabric filters and
       electrostatic precipitators,  handling of dry collected material; in the case of
       scrubbers,  the   required  slurry  handling  system;   water   pollution  and
       requirements of control of gaseous pollution (S02, 803, NOX, etc.)

              The size  analysis of  the dust being discharged  from  the kiln may
       contain as much as 30% below  5 microns and 10% below 2 microns. It is
       accepted that secondary dry cyclone collectors are unable to meet even the less
       stringent  code  requirements.  The choice must be among the other  three
       categories. A brief description of each follows:

       Fabric Filters
              Fabric filter installations for lime kilns consist of compartmented units
       called "Baghouses". These contain tubes or envelopes made of glass fiber cloth
       to withstand temperatures up to 550° F. As the kiln  exhaust temperatures are
       higher than this,  cooling is  required.  It is  achieved by (1) evaporative water
       sprays,  (2)  indirect radiation convection heat exchange by means of U-tube
       coolers, (3) ambient air dilution, or (4) a combination of these.  Even though
       glass fabric can withstand temperatures  in the 550°F range, it is fragile due to
       the loss in strength  resulting  from  the interyarn  friction produced during
       flexing of the cloth. The flexing is done during the cleaning process.

              In order to maintain acceptable pressure drop values (usually  less than
       5"  wg), the  collected  dust  cake must  be  removed  periodically.  This  is
       accomplished by  isolating one of the compartments and collapsing or shaking
       the bags lightly by reverse gas flow. (Mechanical  shakers are seldom used with
       glass cloth.) Each compartment is "off-line" for a nominal time of 2-5 minutes
       to complete the cleaning. The  dust falls to the  hopper during cleaning. The

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE,  INC
       total dust load will control the time required between repeated cleaning of each
       compartment.

              As one compartment is usually off-line for cleaning, the total available
       filtration  area is thus reduced. Filter units are specified on the basis of air to
       cloth ratios (cfm of gas per square foot of cloth) for the total unit and for one
       compartment off-line  for  cleaning.  Air  to  cloth ratios for this service are
       nominally 2.2/1 when one compartment is off-line.

              If the air to cloth ratio, which is by definition superficial face velocity,
       is excessively high, the pressure drop will increase, dust impaction may cause
       cake breakage, and dust "bleed through" may occur. Each manufacturer knows
       the  optimum  ratio for his  type of fabric  and  method  of cleaning for
       satisfactory operation.

              Insulation  of  the  equipment  may  be required if  condensation of
       moisture can occur due to the combination of high moisture content in the gas
       and  extremely  low ambient temperatures.  Condensation  can cause many
       maintenance problems including (1) deterioration  of the  enclosure, (2)
       malfunction of  the dust  handling equipment, and  (3)  most  important —
       blinding  of the filter  surface. Sometimes a partial  enclosure can reduce or
       eliminate excessive effects of wind and low air temperatures.

              Replacement of the  fabric  is the  largest single  cost item  in the
       maintenance of this equipment. This  is a true case in point of the adage that
       "an  ounce of prevention is worth a  pound of cure".  Regular inspections and
       repair  or  replacement  of failed bags can provide  significant savings as well as
       maintain  a  consistently high collection efficiency. A nominal two year life is
       achieved for fabric in this application.

              Waste handling equipment generally consists  of screw conveyors to
       remove the dust from the  hoppers or move it to a collection point from.the
       hopper valves. Sometimes air assisted gravity conveyors are used in place of
       screws for dust handling.

       Electrostatic Precipitators

              Precipitators for lime kiln application are of the dry, horizontal  flow,
       plate  type  construction  common to many  other  applications. They are
       constructed of carbon  steel, and therefore the kiln gases must be cooled  to an
       acceptable level.

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE,  INC.
               Cooling  might be accomplished by air dilution or water evaporation.
         Evaporative cooling is preferred because it results in a lower final gas flow, and
         the moisture additive  may improve the dust precipitability.

               Multiple, independently energized electrical sections are used for better
         power distribution so  as to sustain high level performance.

               The kiln gas enters the precipitator and flows through passages created
         by parallel rows-of collecting  plates. Discharge electrodes are centered in each
         passage,  and charge  the dust  particles  negatively. The charged dust particles
         precipitate on the collecting surface, from which they are removed by the use
         of programmed rapping. The dislodged material falls by gravity into hoppers.

               The efficiency of a precipitator is a  function of  the gas velocity and
         treatment  time. Thus,  higher  efficiencies  are attained  in any  process by
         increasing  the  precipitator  size.  Virtually  any  desired  efficiency  can be
         obtained.

         Wet Scrubbers

               This category  includes a considerable number of commercially available
         units of  different designs in the low to  medium pressure drop operating range,
         (6-8" wg) that could  be applied and would meet the  LA-Process Weight code.
         As stated, however,  savings in initial cost may not justify this selection and
         make itmore advisable to consider the higher efficiency units that are available.
         The wet scrubber selected to meet  the more stringent code  (this  report, .03
         gr/ACF) would be either a multi-stage dynamic scrubber or a Venturi-type
         scrubber operating at a  pressure drop of 14-15" wg at conditions.  This study
         included the multi-stage dynamic type for the high efficiency level as tabulated
         in Table 19. A distinct advantage of the wet scrubber for this application is that
         it can be  fabricated  to include a pre-humidification section as  part of the
         scrubber design, therefore, eliminating the need for a separate pre-cooler or gas
         quenching stage.

               The wet scrubber can  also continue to perform under severe conditions
         of operation and minimum  maintenance until proper operating conditions are
         restored. Wet scrubbers, however, do  carry  potential problems that are not
         associated  with  dry  systems. These are basically  — the internal  material
         build-up in the scrubber if liquid rates fall or if dust loadings become unusually
         high because of upset conditions; the build-up at the wet-dry zone especially on
         horizontal gas  inlets; the potential  corrosion which must  be considered  if
         sulphur bearing fuels  are used; the fact that there will  be a visible steam plume;

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS  CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC.
       the proper consideration and attention that must be given to the disposal of
       slurry.

              In considering the slurry disposal system, one must avoid unusually
       long and horizontal  runs if slurry is being led to settling ponds or basins. Some
       areas also may require  treatment of the very highly  alkaline  slurry before
       disposal. Consideration should also  be given  to  the proper location of the
       primary exhaust fan if a Venturi-type scrubber is  used.  Placing this fan before
       the scrubber is not practical at the high gas temperatures. This places the fan on
       the discharge of the scrubber in the cool gas stream. In this location, the fan
       may require alloy construction to avoid corrosion. Fan maintenance may be
       excessive if conditions of condensation or scrubber water entrainment exist.
       These cause material build-up on the fan resulting in fan imbalance. Frequently
       this can be avoided  by reheating the gases slightly (10-20°F) before they enter
       the fan.

              All three categories of collectors have been used commercially although
       most of the installations are wet scrubbers.

              All  three  types of equipment have met  high performance standards
       where  they have been  properly  designed and  operated. Reports regarding
       operating and  maintenance costs for wet scrubbers and fabric collectors vary
       widely although it appears that on the average, these costs are higher for wet
       scrubber and fabric filters than for electrostatic  precipitators.

              b.     SPECIFICATIONS  AND COSTS FOR  ROTARY  LIME  KILN
                     APPLICATIONS

              The  specifications for each type of equipment were prepared in the
       same form as  the Sample Specification given in Appendix IV. For simplicity,
       only the parts of the specification relating to the application in question are
       given for each of the equipment types in this section of the report.
              1)
ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATORS FOR LIME KILNS
              Precipitators are not often utilized  for rotary  lime kilns. They have
       been applied successfully to dusts of this type, however, and are economical for
       the larger installations.

                                  SPECIFICATIONS

              The  information provided the member companies for quoting these

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS CLEANING    INSTITUTE, INC
        units  is given in Tables 12 and  13.  These Tables present  the information
        furnished  as pages  3 and  4 of a  specification, leaving only the general
        conditions and terms to be covered in pages 1, 2,  5 and 6. Ordinarily, a good
        deal more data will be supplied to the equipment manufacturer, particularly
        when requesting installed costs. Drawings of the  existing process equipment,
        soil conditions, source test results, etc. are often appended.

                                        COSTS

               Two cases are specified for each of the precipitator sizes. The first of
        these corresponds to the LA-Process Weight regulation, given  in  Appendix III.
        The prices  quoted for this case are listed in Table 14a. The  higher efficiency
        case involves larger and more costly precipitators, as shown in Table 14b.

               Several  descriptive comments by the precipitator manufacturer are
        included in the following paragraphs. In each case the comments cover the
        equipment  items only, although the turnkey cost  includes other items such as
        ductwork, foundations, etc.

                                 LA-PROCESS WEIGHT

               The Small Electrostatic Precipitator quotation includes:

               One (1) precipitator, containing 11 gas passages, 9" x 20'-0" x 18'-0",
        (when treating 24,500 cfm at 700°F, will be 98.1% efficient). Two (2) 250 ma
        rectifier sets will be used to  energize the  precipitator. A cooling tower capable
        of removing 105,500 Btu/Min. which will cool 35,000 cfm of  gas at 1200°F to
        700°F, requiring 10 gal. of water per minute. A dust system consisting of a 530
        cubic foot  storage hopper adjacent to the precipitator, a screw  conveyor and
        elevator.

               The Medium Electrostatic Precipitator quotation includes:

               One (1) precipitator, containing 23 gas passages, 9" x 24'-0" x 18'-0",
        (when treating 59,500 cfm at 700°F, will be 98.6% efficient). Two (2) 250 ma
        rectifier sets will be used to  energize the  precipitator. A cooling tower capable
        of  removing 256,500  Btu/Min. will  cool 85,000 cfm of gas at  1200°F  to
        700°F, requiring 24 gal. of water per minute. A dust system consisting of a
        1230 cubic foot storage hopper adjacent  to the precipitator, a screw conveyor
        and elevator.

               The Large Electrostatic Precipitator quotation includes:

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS CLEANING    INSTITUTE,  INC.
                                            Table  12

                    ELECTROSTATIC  PRECIPITATOR  PROCESS  DESCRIPTION
                           FOR  ROTARY LIME  KILN SPECIFICATION
               The electrostatic precipitator is to handle the exhaust gas from a rotary lime kiln
         fired by natural gas. The precipitator will be used to remove limestone and lime dust from
         the exhaust gas. The rotary kiln is fed with 1/4" to 1/2" limestone. There is no preheater on
         the kiln and  the feed end of the kiln is equipped with a dust fall-out chamber. The dust
         chamber is followed by a flash cooling system which reduces the gas temp from  1200°F to
         550 - 500°F.

               The exhaust gas will be brought from  the feed end housing to a point twenty feet
         outside the building and twenty feet above grade. The precipitator will be located at grade in
         an area beyond the duct work and the area is free of space limitations. A fan will follow the
         precipitator and then a stack 50 feet in height.

               The precipitator is to operate in  such a manner as to continuously reduce the outlet
         loading to the specified levels. An automatic control should be supplied to give maximum
         dust removal. Two or more electrical fields in direction of gas flow must be included.  The
         hoppers should have a minimum side and valley angle of 60 °. A screw conveyor system to
         bring  the dust to one point 3 feet outside  the precipitator is to be included. A  safety
         interlock system must be included on all access openings to the  inside of precipitator.  The
         rapping system must have a variable impact and timing cycle. From the common dust point
         the dust will be elevated to a dust bin adjacent to the collector. The bin will have a fifteen
         (15) foot clearance from grade. Hoppers and conveyors should be insulated.

               For purposes of this quotation, the external hoppers and conveyor will be  considered
         auxiliary equipment.

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE, INC.
                                           Table 13
                  ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR  OPERATING CONDITIONS
                          FOR  ROTARY LIME KILN SPECIFICATION
         Three  sizes  of electrostatic precipitators  are to be quoted at each of two efficiency
         levels as specified below:
                                                      Small
                              Medium
             Large
         Kiln capacity, ton/day
         Process weight, Ib/hr
         Kiln outlet gas
              Flow, ACFM
              Temp., °F
              % moisture
         Precipitator inlet
              Flow, ACFM
              Temp., °F
              % moisture
         Precipitator inlet loading, Ib/hr
         Precipitator inlet loading, gr/ACF
                    125
                  18,700

                 35,000
                   1,200
                     12

                 20,000
                    550
                     16
                    815
                   4.75
         Outlet loading, Ib/hr
         Outlet loading, gr/ACF
         Efficiency, wt %
Case 1 — LA Process Weight

                    15.4
                     0.090
                    98.1

 Case 2 — High Efficiency
   250
37,400

85,000
 1,200
    12

50,000
   550
    16
 1,960
  4.55
  26.9
   0.063
  98.6
   500
 74,800

150,000
  1,200
     12

 90,000
   550
     16
  3,500
   4.55
   40
    0.052
   98.85
         Outlet loading, Ib/hr
         Outlet loading, gr/ACF
         Efficiency, wt %
                    5.15
                    0.03
                   99.4
  12.9
   0.03
  99.3
   23.2
    0.03
   99.3

-------
    INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC.
                                 Table 14a
                        Electrostatic Precipitator Cost Data
                            for Rotary Lime Kilns
                             (LA-Process Weight)
INFORMATION
Process Capacity, Ton/Day
Inlet Gas Volume, ACFM
Efficiency, Wt. %
Controlled Emission, gr/ACF
Type of Charge
o
Inlet Gas Temperature, F
Fan (.3" WgJ
System Horsepower Precip. HVPS*
Equipment Cost, $
A. Collector
B. Auxiliaries
C. Gas Conditioning Equipment**
D. Waste Equipment
E. Other
Total
Installation Cost, $
A. Grass-Roots
B. Add-On
Expected Life, Years
Operating and Maintenance , $/Year
ELECTROSTATIC PRECIP.
SMALL
125
24,500
98.1
.090
Limestone
700
LL
42
50,600
50,900
12,350
113,850
65,600
72,200
20
1,500
MEDIUM
250
59,500
98.6
.063
Limestone
700
iU
60
64,600
62,900
29,500
157,000
101,100
111,200
20
1,500
M
LARGE
500
105,000
98.85
.052
Limestom
700
50
74
87,900
76,500
51,500
215,900
150,200
165,200
20
2,500
*  High voltage  power supply, figured as horsepower  equivalent.
** This includes the gas cooling  system.

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC
                              Table 14b

                     Electrostatic Precipitator Cost Data
                         for Rotary Lime Kilns
                           (High Efficiency)
INFORMATION
Process Capacity, Ton/Day
Inlet Gas Volume, ACFM
Efficiency, Wt . 1
Controlled Emission, gr/ACF
Type of Charge
o
Inlet Gas Temperature, F
Fan C3" wg)
System Horsepower Precip. HVPS*
Equipment Cost, $
A. Collector
B. Auxiliaries
C. Gas Conditioning Equipment
D. Waste Equipment
E. Other
Total
Installation Cost, $
A. Grass-Roots
B. Add-On
Expected Life, Years
Operating and Maintenance $/Year
ELECTROSTATIC PRECIP.
SMALL
125
24,500
99.4
.03
Limestone
700
12
59
68,200
57,800
12,350
138,350
76,900
84,600
20
2,000
MEDIUM
250
59,500
99.3
.03
Limestone
700
30
105
79,400
72,600
29,500
181,500
109,100
120,000
20
2,000
LARGE
500
105,000
99.3
.05
Limestone
700
50
129
102,500
85,000
51,500
239,000
155,200
171,000
20
3,000
High .Voltage Power Supply,  figured as horsepower equivalent.

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING  INSTITUTE, INC
                               Figure 2


                     Costs of Electrostatic Precipitators

                          For Rotary Lime Kilns

                          (LA-Process Weight)
       600  -i
 rt
 O
 (=)
 03
 t/>
 3
 O
 J^
 H
       300
       200
       100
        50
         25
         10
                      TIT
rm
                                             1
                        Turnkey Installation
                        for Grass Roots  Plant
                                ffitt
                                Srft
                                                         &L
                         Precipitator
                         Auxiliary Equipment
                            125          250         500

                             Kiln Capacity,  Ton/Day
                                         ±000

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC.
                               Figure 3


                     Costs of Electrostatic Precipitators


                          For Rotary Lime Kilns

                            (High Efficiency)
     03
     O
     o
     rt
     V)
     3
     O
     43
     H
     45
           600
           300
           200
           100
            50
            25  -
            10
                t



Turnkey Installation
Grass Roots  Plant
                                                I!



                                                             m

                       Precipitator and
                       Auxiliary Equipment
                           Precipitator

                              Only

                                                           3
                                                             r&
               50
     125        250         500

        Kiln Capacity,  fon/Day

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE,  INC.
               One (1)  precipitator, containing 43 gas passages, 9" x 24'-0" x 18'-0",
        (when treating 105,000 cfm at 700°F, will be 98.85% efficient). Two (2) 500
        ma  rectifier sets will  be used to energize the precipitator. A cooling tower
        capable of removing 451,000 Btu/Min. will cool 150,000 cfm of gas at 1200°F
        to 700°F, requiring 40 gal. of water per  minute. A dust system consisting of a
        2160 cubic foot storage hopper adjacent to the precipitator, a screw conveyor
        and elevator.

                               HIGH EFFICIENCY CASE

               The Small Electrostatic Precipitator quotation includes:

               One (1) precipitator, containing 13 gas passages, 9" x 15'-0" x 27'-0"
        (when treating 24,500 cfm at 700°F, will be 99.4% efficient). Three (3) 250
        ma  rectifier sets will  be used to energize the precipitator. A cooling tower
        capable of removing 105,500 Btu/Min. will cool 35,000 cfm of gas at 1200°F
        to 700°F, requiring 10 gal. of water per  minute. A dust system consisting of a
        550 cubic foot storage hopper adjacent to the precipitator, a screw conveyor
        and elevator.

               The Medium Electrostatic  Precipitator quotation includes:

               One (1)  precipitator, containing 19 gas passages, 9" x 24'-0" x 27'-0",
        (when treating 59,500 cfm at 700°F, will be 99.3% efficient.) Three (3) 250
        ma  rectifier sets will  be used to energize the precipitator. A cooling tower
        capable of removing 256,500 Btu/Min. will cool 85,000 cfm of gas at 1200°F
        to 700°F, requiring 24 gal. of water  per minute. A dust system  consisting of
        1250 cubic foot storage hopper adjacent to the precipitator, a screw conveyor
        and elevator.

               The Large Electrostatic Precipitator quotation includes:

               One (1)  precipitator, containing 33 gas passages, 9" x 24'-0" x 27'-0",
        (when treating 105,000 cfm at 700°F, will be 99.3% efficient.) Three (3) 500
        ma  rectifier sets will  be used to energize the precipitator. A cooling tower
        capable of removing 451,000 Btu/Min. will cool 150,000 cfm of gas at 1200°F
        to 700° F, requiring 40 gal. of water per  minute. A dust system consisting of a
        2190 cubic foot storage hopper adjacent to the precipitator, a screw conveyor
        and elevator.

               It should be noted that,  whereas  the operating conditions specified a
        temperature of 550°F after cooling, a temperature of 700° F  was used for the

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE,  INC.
        quotation. The manufacturer's judgment was that the dust resistivity would be
        too high for good precipitator performance at 550°F, and that this condition
        could be corrected by  increasing the operating temperature.  Responses by
        manufacturers  of  air  pollution  control  equipment  often  include  such
        exceptions  to  the conditions specified and the experience of the precipitator
        manufacturer in treating similar problems should be utilized.

               The costs reported in Tables 14a and 14b are plotted in Figures 2 and 3.
               2)
FABRIC FILTERS FOR LIME KILNS
               Fabric filters  are  specified for both  efficiency  levels, but with the
        understanding that a fabric collector of ordinary design would have a higher
        efficiency than the "high  efficiency" case. The pertinent process description
        and operating conditions are specified in Tables 15 and 16.

               It should be  noted  that the  operating conditions  specified  at the
        collector inlet  were exactly  the same  for the fabric  collector  as  for the
        electrostatic. The costs for the three filter  sizes are given in Table 17. Whereas
        the  electrostatic  precipitator  design  temperature was  modified  by  the
        precipitator manufacturer  to 700°F, the filter manufacturer quoted  equipment
        to operate  at the specified 550°F. The costs given in Table 17 are  plotted on
        log-log coordinate paper in Figure 4.
               3)
WET SCRUBBERS FOR LIME KILNS
               The specification information for the wet scrubber is given in Tables 18
        and  19.  The  scrubber  inlet conditions  are  similar  to those specified for
        precipitators and fabric filters, but the outlet volume (which sets the size of the
        scrubber  and the fan) is considerably  smaller, due to cooling of the gas as it
        becomes saturated.

               The cost data submitted by the manufacturer is shown  in Tables 20 and
        21. Some descriptive information  was supplied  by  the manufacturer  which
        points up differences in the basic design of the equipment offered for the two
        efficiency levels.

                               LA-PROCESS WEIGHT

               For  the LA-Process Weight or  Lower  Efficiency requirement,  the
        scrubber offered is a  single stage centrifugal tower type scrubber fabricated of

-------
INDUSTRIAL     GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE, INC.
                                              Table 15

                             FABRIC COLLECTOR PROCESS DESCRIPTION
                              FOR ROTARY LIME KILN SPECIFICATION
                 The bag filter is to handle the exhaust gas from a rotary lime kiln fired by natural
          gas. The filter will be used to remove limestone and lime dust from the exhaust gas.  The
          rotary kiln is fed with 1/4" to 1/2" limestone. There is no preheater on the kiln and the feed
          end of the kiln is equipped with a dust fall-out chamber. The dust chamber is followed by a
          flash cooling system which reduces the gas temp, to 550°F - 500°F.

                 The exhaust gas wilt be brought from  the feed end housing to a point twenty  feet
          outside the building where a fan will be located. (The  fan outlet is five (5) feet above grade).
          The fabric filter will  be located in an area beyond  the fan  and  the area is free of space
          limitations.  The fabric filter should be of positive design.

                 The fabric  filter is to operate in such a manner that a single compartment (with no
          more  than  one quarter of the total collecting surface area) is isolated for cleaning.  The
          cleaning method is to be reverse air flow type. Each section should be capable of isolation
          for maintenance and have  provisions for personnel  safety when the filter is in use.  The
          hoppers should have a minimum to side and  valley angle of 60° with screw conveyors to
          bring the dust to a centrally located point 3 feet outside the filter.  Dust removal should be a
          continuous process. The hopper valve is to be included in the quote. From this point the
          dust will be elevated to a dust bin adjacent to the filter. The bin will have a 15 foot clearance
          from grade. Treated glass cloth filter bags should not exceed  12" in diameter and 30 feet in
          length. The cleaning cycle should be adjustable in duration  of compartment cleaning  and
          total cycle length. No more than two bags must be removed to have access to all bags.

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE, INC
                                          Table 16
                        FABRIC COLLECTOR OPERATING CONDITIONS
                          FOR ROTARY LIME KILN SPECIFICATIONS
        3.      OPERATING  CONDITIONS

               Three sizes of fabric collectors are to be quoted. While two levels of efficiency
               are specified,  it is expected that a single fabric quotation will be supplied for
               each size range.
                                                     Small
                              Medium
           Large
        Kiln capacity, ton/day
        Process weight, Ib/hr
        Kiln outlet gas
             Flow, ACFM
             Temp., °F
             % moisture
        Filter inlet
             Flow, ACFM
             Temp., °F
             % moisture
        Filter inlet loading, Ib/hr
        Filter inlet loading, gr/ACF
        Outlet loading, Ib/hr
        Outlet loading, gr/ACF
        Efficiency, wt %
                    125         250         500
                  18,700       37,400      74,800

                 35,000       85,000     150,000
                   1,200        1,200        1,200
                     12           12          12

                 20,000       50,000      90,000
                    550         550         550
                     16           16          16
                    815        1,960       3,500
                   4.75         4.55        4.55

Case 1 — LA Process Weight

                    15.4         26.9        40
                    0.090        0.063       0.052
                   98.1         98.6        98.85

 Case 2 — High Efficiency
        Outlet loading, Ib/hr
        Outlet loading, gr/ACF
        Efficiency, wt %
                     5.15
                     0.03
                    99.4
12.9
 0.03
99.3
23.2
 0.03
99.3

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING  INSTITUTE, INC
                             Table 17
                      Fabric Collector Cost Data
                        for Rotary Lime Kilns

INFORMATION
Process Capacity, Ton/Day
Inlet Gas Volume, ACFM ;
Efficiency, Wt . %
Controlled Emission, gr/ACF
Type of Charge
e
Inlet Gas Temperature, F
System Horsepower
Equipment Cost, $
A. Collector
B. Auxiliaries
C. Gas Conditioning Equipment
D. Waste Equipment
E. Other 1
Total
Installation Cost, $ :
A. Grass-Roots
B. Add-On
Expected Life, Years
Operating and Maintenance $/year
FABRIC FILTER
SMALL
125
20,000
99 Plus
0.03
Limestone
550
Hot 60
Cold 111
53,250
10,480
3,740
18,610
6,610
94,690
75,750
20 - 25
11,000.00
MEDIUM
250
50,000
99 Plus
0.03
Limestone
550
150
300
75,620
17,910
4,675
20,680
11,890
130,775
100,695
20 - 25
18,000.00
LARGE
500
90,000
99 Plus
0.03
Limestone
550
300
600
106,515
27,840
6,440
23,250
16,405
180,450
135.,340
20 - 25
30,000.00

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING  INSTITUTE, INC.
                               Figure 4


                         Costs of Fabric Collectors


                          For Rotary Lime Kilns
          500
          300
                  Turnkey Installation
                 ! for  Grass Roots Plant
                       ±Hti+fH-t-ht+4-HH-H+H
               f  Fabric Filter  S.
                 Auxiliary Equipment
                                         Fabric Filter
                                             Only
           25
                             125        250         500

                                Capacity, Ton/Day
1000

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE, INC
        carbon steel  throughout. Operating pressure drop across the unit is 8.0" wg.
        Scrubber includes lower shell extension for humidification of hot inlet gases.
        Inlet connection has a 304 stainless steel  insert  sleeve. All doors  are of the
        quick acting type.

               "Auxiliaries" include the required main exhaust fan of the heavy duty
        radial  bladed type; a TEFC motor (460 volt, 60 cycle, 3 phase); V-belt  drive
        and guard; a recycle  pump; a recycle and  bleed pump with motor and drive;
        and a tank with liquid level and make-up water controls.

               The installation cost  item  includes the  ductwork from the kiln dust
        chamber take-off to the scrubber inlet — ductwork from scrubber outlet to the
        fan inlet and discharge stack at fan outlet.  All structural supports; erection of
        the total system including excavation and concrete work, liquid feed piping and
        electric hook-up from adjacent power source are also included.

                               HIGH EFFICIENCY CASE

               For the High  Efficiency Level, the scrubber  is a two stage dynamic
        scrubber including an integral wetted fan, which in addition to being the prime
        mover in the total system,  is also the second stage of the scrubber. Fabrication
        of the collector is of  carbon steel except for the fan wheel  which is type 304
        stainless steel. Scrubber to  include lower shell extension for humidification of
        hot inlet gases. The inlet connection has a type 304 stainless steel insert sleeve.
        All doors are of the quick acting type with the flushed fan as an internal part of
        the scrubber.

               The horsepower consumed  by the fan is comparable to the horsepower
        requirement of a free standing scrubber operating at 8.0" wg pressure drop.

               The auxiliaries include a TEFC drive motor  (460 volt, 60 cycle,  3
        phase); V-belt drive and belt guard; recycle tank; recycle and bleed pump with
        motor and drive; tank liquid level and make-up water controls.

               Installation  costs include the ductwork  from the take-off of the dust
        chamber to the scrubber inlet, and the stack on top  of the vertical scrubber
        discharge. Also included are all structural supports; erection of the total system
        including excavation  and  concrete work, liquid  feed  piping  and  electric
        hook-up from adjacent power source.

               The following quantity of make-up  water will be required to cover the
        evaporative loss and the bleed rate to maintain a 5% recycle slurry. This applies

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING   INSTITUTE,  INC
       to both the low and high efficiency system:

                     125 TPD System           75 GPM

                     250 TPD System          180 GPM

                     500 TPD System          300 GPM

              The costs given in Tables 20 and 21  are plotted on log-log coordinates
       in Figures 5 and 6.

              Several points should be noted when comparing the equipment quoted
       for the  LA-Process  Weight and High  Efficiency  cases.  The high efficiency
       scrubber  is  a  proprietary design  aimed at producing good  efficiency at
       minimum cost  for this specific  application. Various proprietary designs are
       available as well as conventional Venturi or orifice-type scrubbers.

              The cost comparison indicates that the high efficiency can be achieved
       with a lower expenditure of capital and operating  cost. It is not unusual that
       the first costs of high efficiency scrubbers are little higher than lower efficiency
       designs; however, the power costs will ordinarily  increase substantially with
       increases in  efficiency. That they  do  not in this comparison  (which  shows
       almost identical  horsepower requirements for the two efficiencies) is peculiar
       to the equipment of the manufacturer preparing these quotations. The lower
       efficiency design is for a Venturi scrubber, whereas the high efficiency scrubber
       is a dynamic type.

              c.     DISCUSSION   OF  COSTS   FOR  ROTARY  LIME  KILN
                     APPLICATION

              Rotary  lime  kiln  applications  are most frequently handled by  wet
       scrubbers. The  reason for this is  apparent when  the costs of the  turnkey
       installations given  for the three types of equipment are compared. Figure 7
       shows these costs for the high efficiency case as a function of kiln size. The wet
       scrubber satisfies all of the process requirements, yet has an initial cost of less
       than 1/2 that for a precipitator or fabric filter. This holds true over the entire
       range of sizes.

              There is a  horsepower  penalty  involved  with the scrubber operation,
       however.  Rather surprisingly,  this is not significant in comparison with the
       fabric  collector. However, it requires much more power than the electrostatic
       precipitator.

-------
INDUSTRIAL     GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE,  INC.
                                             Table 18

                            WET SCRUBBER PROCESS  DESCRIPTION

                            FOR ROTARY  LIME KILN SPECIFICATION
                The scrubber is to handle the exhaust gas from a rotary lime kiln fired by natural gas.
         The scrubber will be used to remove limestone and lime dust from the exhaust gas. The rotary
         kiln is fed with 1/4" to 1/2" limestone. There is no preheater on the kiln and the feed end of
         the kiln is equipped with a dust fall-out chamber.  The dust chamber is followed by a wet
         scrubber with pre-cooling sprays or saturation chamber as required. Such pre-cooling
         equipment is to be  located at the discharge from the fall-out chamber, and must cool the
         ductwork  to a maximum of 550°F. It will be considered as an integral part of the scrubber
         for this quotation.

                The exhaust gas will be brought from the precooling section to a point twenty feet
         outside the building where a fan  will be located.  (The fan outlet is five (5) feet above grade.)
         The scrubber will be located in an area beyond the fan. The area is free of space limitations.
         The scrubber is to be designed to withstand the full discharge pressure developed by the fan.

                The scrubber is to operate in such a manner as to continuously attain the efficiency
         levels specified in the following section.

                The  scrubber shall  have a conical  bottom designed  to avoid the collection  of
         sediment or deposits. Liquor effluent is to be piped to a recirculation tank from which the
         recirculation pump takes suction. Fresh makeup water is to be added to the system at this
         point.  Discharge from the recirculation pump is to be partially returned to the scrubber and
         part withdrawn  to  a slurry settling basin to  be provided by the customer. The  slurry
         withdrawal is to be set to maintain about 10 weight percent solids when the kiln is operating
         at design capacity.

                The scrubber and external piping are  to be constructed  of carbon steel. Packing
         glands are to be flushed with fresh water to prevent binding of the seals.

                For purposes of this quotation,  the  following is  to  be considered  auxiliary
         equipment:

                 (1)      pumps and reservoir
                 (2)      fan
                 (3)      external piping
                 (4)      controls

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE, INC
                                          Table  19
                          WET SCRUBBER OPERATING CONDITIONS
                          FOR ROTARY LIME KILN SPECIFICATIONS
        Three sizes of scrubbers are to be quoted for each of two levels of efficiency.
                                                                  (B)
                                                                Medium
                                            (C)
                                           Large
        Furnace capacity, ton
        Production rate, Ib/hr
        Process weight rate, Ib/hr
        Inlet gas volume, ACFM
        Inlet gas temperature, °F
        Inlet loading, Ib/hr
        Inlet loading, gr/ACF
        Outlet gas volume, ACFM
        Outlet gas temperature, °F
        Outlet loading, Ib/hr
        Outlet loading, gr/ACF
        Efficiency, wt %
125
10,400
18,700
35,000
1,200
815
2.82
19,000
164
250
20,800
37,400
85,000
1,200
1,960
2.69
46,000
164
500
41,600
74,800
150,000
1,200
3,500
2.72
81,000
164
Case 1 - LA Process Weight

                   15.40
                   0.094
                  98.1

 Case 2 — High Efficiency
26.7
 0.068
98.6
40
 0.058
98.9
        Outlet loading, Ib/hr
        Outlet loading, gr/ACF
        Efficiency, wt %
                   4.89
                   0.03
                  99.4
11.85
 0.03
99.4
20.8
 0.03
99.4

-------
INDUSTRIAL  GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC.
                              Table 20
                        Wet Scrubber Cost Data
                         for Rotary Lime Kilns
                         (LA-Process Weight)
INFORMATION
Process Capacity, Ton/Day
Inlet Gas Volume, ACFM
Efficiency, Wt.%
Controlled Emission, gr/ACF
Type of Charge
Inlet Gas Temperature, F
System Horsepower
Equipment Cost, $
A. Collector
B. Auxiliaries
C. Gas Conditioning Equipment
D. Waste Equipment
E. Other
Total
Installation Cost, $
A. Grass-Roots
B. Add-On
Expected Life, Years
Operating and Maintenance $/year
WET SCRUBBER
SMALL
125
35,000
98.1
0.094
Limestone
1,200
65
7 >200
10,850
18,050
57,900
71,500
10
4,800
MEDIUM
250
LARGE
500
85,000 1.50,000
98,6
0.068
Limestone
1,200
147
13,100
16,770
29,870
79,700
97,100
10
5,600
98.9
0.058
Limestone
1,200
268
23,600
36,960
60,560
103,900
127,170
10
6,500

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING  INSTITUTE, INC.
                               Table 21
                         Wet Scrubber Cost Data




                          for Rotary Lime Kilns



                           (High Efficiency)
INFORMATION
Process Capacity, Ton/Day
Inlet Gas Volume, ACFM
Efficiency, Wt.l
Controlled Emission, gr/ACF
Type of Charge
Inlet Gas Temperature, F
System Horsepower
Equipment Cost, $
A. Collector
B. Auxiliaries
C. Gas Conditioning Equipment
D. Waste Equipment
E. Other
Total
Total Installation Cost, $
A. Grass-Roots
B. Add -On
Expected Life, Years
Operating and Maintenance $/year
WET SCRUBBER
SMALL
125
35,000
99.4
0.03
Limestone
1,200
60
14,300
9,250
23,550
48,900
61,400
10
4,800
MEDIUM
250
85,000
99.4
0,03
Limestone
1,200
140
25,800
12,600
38,400
66,300
83,400
10
5,600
LARGE
500
150,000
99.4
0,03
Limestone
1,200
245
44,700
16,700
61,400
86,900
110,400
10
6,500

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE,  INC.
     rt
     rH
     rH
     o
     Q
     c
     rt
     tn

     O

     H

     i
     I/)
     O
                              Figure 5


                         Costs of Wet Scrubbers


                         For Rotary Lime Kilns

                          (LA-Process Weight)
UU - ;;:? =E = EE;
00 - :::: ^^
oo - ;= |;;;;
50 - i ===== =
25 - = ===!==
10 - 	 	

::' Turn
- for (
Wet Sc
Auxili
___ 	 _ ^
- -- 	 i ' —

k
r^
I
f
A
—

e
1
•
i
EEEEEEEEEE:;E;;;;;E:;;;;; ;: ••;•• EEEEE;|
iy Installation ttro
ass Roots Plant -
1 1 t 1 1 1 H 1 I+-H"|--| H i M HII-HIHIHIIHI -I-I--P *-
p_ _^._ _ _ 	 . _ ^ « * , >
, ' '
ubber and ; EE^?EE
ry Equipment '• !:"E:":
\rl 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 H 1 III mill i 1 1 Lrti
1 	 	 - 	 	 9
	 	 .. . IL 	
..,.,.. .,.,,::....:= Wet Set

NTT It™ mil 1
»
•ubber Only M :,
             50
125         250          500
  Kiln Capacity,  Ton/Day
1,000

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE,  INC
                             Figure 6


                        Costs of Wet Scrubbers


                        For Rotary Lime Kilns

                          (High Efficiency)
         o
         Q
         rt
         tn
         3
         O
         X
         H
         tf)
         O
         u
             300
             200
             100
              50
25
             10









::j Wet
AUJ



Turnke
for Gr



Scrub
:iliary
£
~ 	 '"• - j ' —


y
a



b



•


*
e
E







>]
:<

|MBi|iilMM
_.:::::::::::::::::::::::±:4tt: :::::::
4HtitttiMMfflP::^f1 ll
--, 	 	 +----!, ;i:U 	
Installation — 1

S "Roots Plant 1 "",'•''

,_ _"::":::- 	 'ij. '; •*"---

^?__ _3i — 	 	 	 ...
f § ;Eii;j; ::.:;;:: EEEE^EE
^Ulpment :::::•,-.: :l::| :::::::
	 ±-;'
-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC.
                            Figure 7
                    Comparison of Abatement Costs
                       for Rotary Lime Kilns
o uu —
500 -
t/i
>H mm
rt Vm
"3 300 -
Q
O
 200 -
rt
10
3
o
x:
H


*
^ 100 -
0
u
50 . •
25 Jjp


;:::; E









lect

- 	 	 	 j
	 ,i



:::: •:



r









ic Precipitator :::
= z-"5S?::::::::::::::;;i! :::::
^ p * -- — 	 .-..-
-^'•^tf 	 	 	 	
	 	 	 _a-!


1 ' ' '
lii1

-I::;;;:;;;;;;; :::::;:;-::::j -|

•-,••• 	 -.-*- 	
BHBiillflitllllllllllli
--•• Fabric Filter
;;:::::;;;::;: 	 :En!;!:j;ii-;;;;.;
b;!|5 	 N=!iy;i!2! 	
,-?'. 	 	 	 ... _ 	 i__j. 	 	

it
Wet Scrubber

I
            50
125        250        500
    Capacity, Ton/Day
1000

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING    INSTITUTE,  INC.
              The horsepower shown for the 500 ton kiln in Table 21 is 245. If the
       operation is carried out 24 hours/day, 300 days/year, this would cost

                     245 x 300 x 24 x 0.746/0.85 x $.01 = $15,425

       per year at M per kw-hr and 85% efficiency of the driver.

              Several  other  factors  merit  some  consideration  in  the choice of
       equipment. For example, the precipitator and fabric filter life was estimated at
       20 or more years, whereas the scrubber  shows only  10 years expected life.
       While  differences  in  estimates made by different manufacturers have  less
       significance than if all were prepared by the same  person, it is likely that there
       is a difference due to the more difficult corrosion problems  presented in wet
       scrubber applications.

              Precipitator maintenance  is principally involved with inspection, with
       only  nominal  cleaning and replacement  of parts.  Fabric  filter  maintenance
       consists mainly of bag replacement, which is a substantial cost that increases in
       proportion to the  size of the collector. For the wet scrubber, more extensive
       cleaning, replacement  of plugged or eroded nozzles, etc. involves a maintenance
       cost, which increases with the size of the scrubber.

                       REFERENCES FOR LIME KILN SECTION
              1.     Boynton,  R.  S.,  "Chemistry  and Technology of Lime
                         & Limestone" 1966 (Interscience) Wiley

              2.     Lewis, C. J., Crocker, B.B., "The Lime Industry's Problem
                         of Airborne Dust" APCA Journal 19, 31-39 (Jan. 1969)

              3.     Anon., "River Rouge Plant Supplies Detroit Steelmakers",
                         .Rock Products (July, 1966)

              4.     Schwarzkopf, F., "A Comparison of Modern Calcining
                         System" Rock Products (July, 1970)

              5.     Shreve, R. Norris, "Lime Manufacture" Chemical Process
                         Industries, 3rd Edition, McGraw-Hill Book Co.

              6.     IGCI Publication EP-5 "Information for Preparation of
                         Bidding Specifications for Electrostatic Precipitators",
                         IGCI, Box 448, Rye, N.Y.

              7.     IGCI Publication F-2 "Fundamentals of  Fabric Collectors
                         and Glossary of Terms", IGCI, Box 448, Rye, N.Y.

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC
       2.     AIR  POLLUTION  CONTROL
              REVERBERATORY FURNACES
  FOR  BRASS/BRONZE
              a.
                     PROCESS DESCRIPTION
                                     Process Flow

              The basic flow of the process begins with the raw material, which in the
        bronze and brass industry consists primarily of copper-base alloy scrap. The
        scrap contains  many  contaminants that  must  be  removed. The common
        contaminants would include oil, grease, insulation, rubber, anti-freeze solutions
        and  many  other chemicals. A list of various copper bearing  scrap follows in
        Table 22.  Methods of pre-processing scrap fall  into three basic categories:
        mechanical, hydrometallurgical,  and pyrometallurgical.  Of these separation
        techniques, the pyrometallurgical  method contributes  the most toward air
        contamination. A brief outline of these methods follows:
              1)   Mechanical
                       Hand sorting
                       Stripping (wire insulation)
                       Shredding
Magnetizing
Briquetting
   (Compressing scrap)
              2)   Hydrometallurgical
                       Concentrating (gravity separation in a liquid medium)

              3)   Pyrometallurgical
                       Sweating (low melting point metals)
                       Burning (rubber insulation, etc.)
                       Drying at low temperature (to drive off volatile
                          impurities such as oil and grease)
                       Blast furnace or cupola (dense molten metal
                          separates from the non-metallic slag)

              The pre-processed scrap is then fed into a furnace such as the open
       hearth reverberatery.  After the heat is begun additional charges of scrap are
       usually added. A diagramatic flow sheet relating  these processes to  the overall
       scheme is shown in Figure 8.

              The next step in the  process is the refining stage. Here the remaining
       impurities and other elements in excess of the specifications are removed. Many
       different methods are employed  to  achieve the desired  results.  Refining  is
       primarily a process of purification using chemicals which are commonly called

-------
INDUSTRIAL     GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE,  INC.
                                                  Table 22
                                TYPES OF COPPER-BEARING SCRAP
           1.       No. 1 copper wire
           2.       No. 2 copper wire
           3.       No. 1 heavy copper
           4.       Mixed heavy copper
           5.       Light copper
           6.       Composition or red brass
           7.       Red brass composition turnings
           8.       Genuine babbitt-lined brass bushings
           9.       High-grade, low-lead bronze solids
          10.       Bronze papermill wire cloth
          11.       High-lead  bronze solids and borings
          12.       Machinery or hard red  brass solids
          13.       Unlined standard red car boxes (clean journals)
          14.       Lined standard red car boxes (lined journals)
          15.       Cocks and faucets
          16.       Mixed brass screens
          17.       Yellow brass scrap
          18.       Yellow brass castings
          19.       Old rolled brass
          20.       New brass clippings
          21.       Brass shell cases without primers
          22.       Brass shell cases with primers
          23.       Brass small arms and rifle shells, clean fired
          24.       Brass small arms and rifle shells, clean muffled (popped)
          25.       Yellow brass primer
          26.       Brass pipe
          27.       Yellow Brass rod turnings
          28.       Yellow brass rod ends
          29.       Yellow brass turnings
          30.       Mixed unsweated auto radiators
          31.       Admiralty brass condenser tubes
          32.       Aluminum brass condenser tubes
          33.       Muntz metal tubes
          34.       Plated rolled brass
          35.       Manganese bronze solids
          36.       New cupro-nickel clippings and solids
          37.       Old cupro-nickel solids
          38.       Soldered cupro-nickel solids
          39.       Cupro-nickel turnings and borings
          40.       Miscellaneous nickel copper and nickel-copper-iron scrap
          41.       New monel clippings and solids
          42.       Monel rods and forgings
          43.       Old monel sheet and solids
          44.       Soldered monel sheet and solids
          45.       Soldered monel wire, screen, and cloth
          46.       New monel wire, screen, and cloth
          47.       Monel castings
          48.       Monel turnings and borings
          49,       Mixed nickel silver clippings
          50.       New nickel silver clippings and solids
          51.       New segregated nickel silver clippings
          52.       Old nickel silver
          53.       Nickel silver castings
          54.       Nickel silver turnings

-------
o>
DOMESTIC
    &
INDUSTRIAL
 SCRAP
SEPARATION
  PROCESS
REVERBERATORY
   FURNACE
COOLING
 SURFACE
                                             GAS OR OIL
                                              FUEL + AIR
                       MECHANICAL
                    HYDROMETALLURGICAL
                    PYROMETALLURGICAL
                                                              SLAG
                                                         METAL
                                                        PRODUCT
  FABRIC
COLLECTOR
                                                                            t
                                                                                        _LIL
                                                                                        FINES
                                                                                                FAN
                                                 Figure 8


-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE,  INC.
       fluxes. These may  be solid, liquid, or gaseous. Compressed  air is often used to
       oxidize the  unwanted elements of aluminum, iron, manganese, and silicon by
       blowing  it through the liquid pool.  The less easily oxidized copper and tin
       remain  in the bath. Part of the zinc,  however, is unavoidably lost. Sometimes
       an inert gas such as nitrogen is used to carry gaseous impurities away from the
       liquid metal if oxidation is to be avoided.

              A slag is usually formed on the  surface of a melt.  A layer of 1/4" to
       1/2" of slag is desirable as a cover or heat retainer. The slag may aid the flux by
       degassing, densifying, fluidizing and homogenizing the alloy. It may also act as
       a hardener, or become part of the alloy depending  upon its composition. When
       impurities can be removed by the flux as slag, no real air pollution problem will
       occur. An air pollution problem will occur when a  gas is blown  below  the
       surface of a bath of metal causing impurities to be released.

               Alloying the melt by adding various pure metals such as zinc or tin  will
       result in the metallic characteristics required. It is usually best, however, to  add
       slag formers while charging so that the cover will  be formed early in order to
       protect the zinc from excessive oxidation.

              The  method of pouring molten alloy into ingot molds varies: It is either
       tapped  directly into a  moving automatic mold  line or poured into a holding
       ladle and transferred to the mold line.

               During the pouring process, large volumes  of metallic oxide fumes are
       emitted  as the alloy  is no  longer protected from the air by the slag cover.
       Smooth  top ingots are produced  by covering the metal surface with ground
       charcoal. The charcoal produces a shower of sparks which is difficult to capture
       in hoods. Hooding movable equipment of this type can be a very complex
       problem.

                                      Equipment

              The  principal  item  of  equipment  is the  reverberatory open hearth
       furnace. This furnace operates by transfering heat from the burner flames, roof
       and walls onto the charge. The  entire roof is sloped down to form a restricted
       section or throat near the back of the hearth which maximizes the amount of
       reflected radiation. The furnace has a shallow, generally rectangular, refractory
       hearth for holding the metal charge. This is one of the least expensive methods
       of melting because the flame  and  products of combustion  come  in direct
       contact with the solid and molten metal.

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE,  INC.
                               Nature of Air Pollutants

              Air or gas usage in  the process gives rise to pollution. This usage,
       coupled with fumes from the furnace, causes pollutant emission. There are four
       principle factors which  contribute  metallic oxide fumes in  brass and bronze
       smelting.

              1)     Alloy composition:  the rate  of loss  of zinc is approximately
                     proportional to the zinc percentage in  the alloy.

              2)     Furnace  type: direct-fired  furnaces,  such  as the open hearth
                     reverberatory,  produce  higher  fume  concentrations  than
                     crucible or electric-type furnaces because the hot, high velocity
                     combustion  gases come  directly  in  contact with the metal
                     resulting  in excessive oxidation.

              3)     Excessive emissions  result from poor foundry practices such as:

                        Improper combustion
                        Overheating of charge
                        Addition of zinc at maximum furnace temperature
                        Flame impingement on charge
                        Heating charge too rapidly
                        Insufficient flux cover
                        Superheating metal
                        Poor control of furnace atmosphere

              4}     Pouring temperature: for a given percentage of zinc, an increase
                     in temperature of 100°F increases the rate of zinc loss about
                     three times. Melting  points for copper alloys are generally in the
                     1500-1800° F range.

              Careful  consideration  of  these  factors  will  greatly  reduce  air
       contamination.

              The gas effluent or the gas exiting from a direct-fired furnace producing
       brass or  bronze metal is ordinarily in the temperature range of 1700°F to
       2400°F.  It  may  contain hydrocarbon  compounds as well as any impurities
       from the charge which are picked up by the mixture of combustion  products
       and infiltrated air. The latter include solid dust particles and oxide fumes.

              A general description of pollutants encountered is as follows:

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC
               1)     In copper based foundries, metallic oxides can account for as
                     much as 98% of the particulate matter. Zinc oxide and  lead
                     oxide fumes occur in the submicron size range. The size range
                     of these fumes produces a tremendous scattering of light which
                     accounts largely for the visible plume discharge.

              2)     Other solid  emissions may include dust, carbon, and smoke
                     from  burning charge impurities.  If a sulfur containing fuel is
                     used,  sulfur oxides will also be released. Nitrogen oxides will be
                     formed to some extent by the burner.

              Furnace emission factors vary depending upon the type of charge, flux,
       slag, fuel and air conditions. Usually emission values for reverberatory furnaces
       run from 26 Ib./ton  to 160 Ib./ton.  Emission rates, however, frequently occur
       outside this range. Gas composition  is described in a series of tests which were
       performed  by the National  Air Pollution Control Administration (NAPCA) to
       analyze the gas discharge from industrial furnaces and air  pollution control
       systems. These tests are summarized in the following paragraphs:
                                        Test  1

              A heat of 85-5-5-5 red brass was made in a 100-ton reverberatory
       furnace.  A total of 105,000 pounds of metal was charged to the furnace over a
       period of 6.7 hours. Oxygen was supplied to the burners for 5.3 of these hours
       to  increase the melting  rate.  During a 9.3  hour refining period there  was
       intermittent air blowing,  and 500 pounds of fluxes were added. Pouring took
       3.5 hours.

              The air pollution control system serves three 100-ton reverberatory
       furnaces. The gases pass through a common spray chamber and then through a
       set of U-tube radiation coolers. From this point, the 450°F to 650°F gases are
       mixed with bleed-in air, go through the baghouse and a 75 horsepower fan, and
       pass to the stack. The 16-compartment shaker-type baghouse is fitted with
       heat-set  Orion  bags.  The total filter  area is 7,360  square feet and the rated
       capacity  is 19,000 cfm at 220° F. The design filter ratio, with one compartment
       out for cleaning, is 2.75/1.

              Measured gas temperature at the baghouse  inlet cycled between 200T
       and 220°F. The measured gas volume averaged 15,000 SCFM (7CPF). Baghouse
       pressure  drop varied from 4 to 5 inches of water.

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC.
               One inlet sample was taken during each of these three furnace periods:
        charging, refining, and pouring.  A continuous baghouse outlet sample  was
        taken over the entire heat, as listed in Table 23.

                                        Test 2

               A set of two  1-hour samples was taken at the  stack of the system
        described in Test 1. Two reverberatory furnaces were operating during these
        tests. Both furnaces were melting during the first test and both were charging
        during the second test, as listed in Table 24.

                                        Test 3

               A reverberatory furnace rated  at 60 tons was tested over a full cycle,
        with three baghouse inlet samples (charge, refine, pour) and a single baghouse
        outlet sample.

               Furnace  gases pass  to a  spray chamber and  then  to U-tube coolers.
        Air-bleed dampers are located at the U-tubes. The  baghouse, with  a rated
        capacity of 22,000 cfm at 180°F, has 5,940 square feet of Dacron fabric. The
        design filter  ratio is  3.87/1. A 75  horsepower fan is  used in the  system.
        Measured stack gas volume was 18,000 SCFM (70°F) during this testing period.
        Capture efficiency of the hooding is estimated at 80 to 85 per cent. Results are
        in Table 25. Gaseous contaminants are listed  in Table 26.
                             AIR POLLUTION CONTROL

               The  nature  of contaminants in brass  and bronze smelting  requires
        careful consideration of ventilation and gas cleaning equipment used.

                      Hooding, Ventilating and Exhaust Requirements

               Reverberatory  furnaces require hoods over charge doors, slag doors, tap
        holes and the main stacks. Inlet velocities for  these of 100 to 200  feet per
        minute are usually sufficient providing good industrial hood design technique is
        used. Arrangements should be provided to turn  down or shut off furnace
        burners during periods when the furnace is open so as to not overload the fan
        exhaust capacity. The periods of concern  are  when the furnace is open for
        lancing, charging, rabbling, slag removal,  charging metal or pouring metal.

                                    Fabric Collectors
               Fabric collectors are the most frequently used equipment to control

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC
                                   Table 23
      BRASS/BRONZE REVERBERATORY FURNACE PARTICULATE  EMISSIONS

                                   Test 1
                                Emissions, furnaceb       Baghouse outlet0
      Cycle      Length, hr.      Ib/hr.    Cycle total,     Ib/hr.    Total, Ib.
                                          Ib.
      Charge3      6.73


      Refine       9.30
             194.2
             159.3
         1,308
         1,482
      Pour
 3.53
12.8
45
      Total
19.56
         2,835
           3.32    64.8
      aTotal charge:  105,000 Ib.  Alloy produced:  BBII Alloy No.
                                             4A: 85-5-5-5


      "Furnace emission factor: 53.7 Ib/ton


      Collection efficiency: 97.7 per cent

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC
                              Table 24

                   EMISSIONS FROM BAGHOUSE ON
              BRASS/BRONZE REVERBERATORY FURNACES


                              Test 2
      Sample
        D-1
                                     Baghouse Outlet
gr/SCF
0.025
Ib/hr
5.13
        D-2
0.031
6.37

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC
                                  Table 25
      BRASS/BRONZE REVERBERATORY FURNACE PARTICULATE EMISSIONS
                                  Test 3
      Cycle
      Total
Length, hr.
  22.1
                                Emissions, furnace"
Ib/hr.    Cycle total,
           Ib.
         11,294.2
                                       Baghouse Outlet0
Ib/hr.  Total, Ib.
Charge3
Refine
Pour
8.5
10.3
3.3
500.1
681.1
8.5
4,250.8
7,015.3
28.1
 2.17   47.9
      aTotal charge: 144,000 Ib.   Alloy produces: BBIIAIIoyNo.
                                           5A: 81-3-7-9


      "Furnace emission factor:  156.9 Ib/ton


      Collection efficiency:  99.6 per cent

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS  CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC
                                 Table 26
      GASEOUS EMISSIONS FROM BRASS/BRONZE REVERBERATORY FURNACE
          Results
Test 1
Test 3
      1.   0,
      2.   C02%
      3.   CO ppm

      4.   S02 ppm

      5.   N02 ppm

      6.   h^S ppm

      7.   Hydrocarbons ppm

      8.   Total Halogens
17.9
0.89
23.2
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.03
N/A
19.0
0.57
20
< 1
<0.1
< 1
N/A
< 1
      Note:  02, C02, and CH^ data are integrated samples over one cycle of the
            furnace; S02, N02, H2S, and halogen data are detector tube samples.

            N/A indicates data not available.

            Results for Test 2 not available.

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE,  INC
        emissions. Efficiencies of 95% to 99.6%  by weight are reported. Various fabric
        media  are employed such  as glass  fibers, wool and synthetics like Orion",
        DacronRand  Nomex".  By catching  the  larger particles and building up a mat
        they are capable of filtering in the submicron range.  Glass media was the
        preferred high temperature  filter but it is being  replaced by Nomex. Although
        glass can withstand a higher temperature, the fibers gradually break because of
        the periodic flexing of the bag resulting in higher maintenance costs.

               One of the critical factors in baghouse design is the filter velocity. With
        a  relatively  small  concentration  of  fumes   a  velocity  of  2.5  FPM   is
        recommended.  Larger  concentrations   require  lower  filter velocities.  High
        velocities require more  frequent shaking which  results in excessive bag wear.  A
        pressure drop of 2 to 6 inches of water is normal and high pressure differentials
        across bags should be avoided.

               The baghouse should be completely enclosed to protect the bags from
        weather variations.  The exhaust fan may be  placed downstream  from the
        baghouse  to  protect  its impeller from  material  impingement  which causes
        excessive wear.

               Baghouses do have  one  disadvantage. The gas stream must be cooled
        before passing through the bags. This is usually accomplished by means of a
        water jacket type cooler which can effectively  reduce a 2000 F discharge to
        about 900 F. An air cooled radiation convection  system can then be used to
        cool the gas to a media-safe temperature.

                               High  Energy Wet Collectors

               High-energy Venturi scrubbers can be used for high efficiency cleaning.
        The collector uses  a  Venturi-shaped  construction  to establish gas throat
        velocities of much higher values than with other types  of wet collectors. The
        principal mechanisms of collection  are  impaction and diffusion. Particles are
        accelerated to very high velocities  and  then impinged  upon atomized water
        droplets. Water is supplied to the throat of the  Venturi. The resulting mixture
        of gases, fume-dust agglomerates, and dirty water must be channeled through a
        separation section for the elimination of the  impurities.  Pressure  drops of 50"
        to 60" of water are needed for high  efficiency cleaning. Gas velocities may
        range from 18,000 to 24,000 FPM in the throat. Water  rates to the throat will
        range from 10 to 15 GPM per 1000 ACFM  of gas.

                                Electrostatic Precipitators

               While precipitators  are  highly efficient devices, they are not ideally

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC.
        suited for the  brass/bronze smelting industry, mainly because of the low gas
        flows used.

                            Comparison of Equipment Types

               The relative merits of fabric filters and high-energy Venturi scrubbers in
        brass and bronze smelters are as follows:

                                FABRIC  COLLECTORS
               Advantages
                                          Disadvantages
         1.   Efficiency is very high.

         2.   Recovers dry product.

         3.   Pressure drop and horsepower
             requirements are low.

         4.   No water pollution problem
             exists.
                                    1.   Bag replacement cost is high.

                                    2.   Bags may be damaged by over-
                                        heating.

                                    3.   Condensation will produce
                                        caking and interfere with oper-
                                        ation.

                                    4.   First cost is high
                                WET SCRUBBERS
                                            2.

                                            3.
1.   Tolerates high temperatures
    (for metal construction)

2.   Can collect gases as well as
    particulates.

3.   First cost is low.

4.   Maintenance cost is relatively
    low.
        5.   There is no condensation problem  5.
             if gases are cooled too much.
May create a water disposal
problem.

Product is collected wet.

Corrosion problems are more
severe than with dry system.

Steam plume opacity may be
objectionable.

Pressure drop and horsepower
requirements are high.
                                            6.   Solids build up at the wet—dry
                                                interface may be a problem

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE,  INC.
                            Equipment  Design  Considerations

               Fabric filters  require a  low temperature gas stream; less than 550° F.
        Orion and Dacron cannot be used above 275° F. Temperature reductions in the
        gas stream can be obtained by means of a water jacket type cooler used in
        series with an air cooled convection system. Caution must be  used to avoid
        condensation on fabric filters by over-cooling. If water condenses on the fabric,
        it may  cause caking and blinding of the  filter. Acid attack  must also  be
        considered if condensation occurs where C02 and sulfur oxides are present.

               Venturi scrubbers require some precooling of high temperature gas to
        prevent  rapid evaporation of fine droplets. The precooling can be accomplished
        by a direct spray quencher. Special consideration must be given to corrosion
        problems in the duct work.

               Efficiencies of  fabric  filters  are  usually  higher than  for  Venturi
        scrubbers. Fabric filter efficiencies are in the range of 95% to 99.6%. Venturi
        scrubber efficiencies are  directly related to the pressure drop across the throat
        and  the gas stream  particle characteristics. Manufacturers usually will  not
        guarantee  Venturi  scrubber  efficiencies  without a  background  of field test
        experience.

               b.     SPECIFICATIONS  AND   COSTS  FOR  BRASS/BRONZE
                      REVERBERATORY FURNACE APPLICATIONS

               As  in  the case  for the rotary  lime  kilns, a  complete equipment
        specification was prepared for both fabric filters and wet scrubbers to serve a
        series of brass/bronze reverberatory furnace sizes. The electrostatic precipitator
        was not considered applicable to this process, so no prices were obtained for
        precipitators.

               Only the parts of the specification  which pertain to  this application
        were included in  this section of the report. A complete sample specification is
        given in  Appendix IV.
               1)
FABRIC FILTERS FOR BRASS/BRONZE FURNACES
               Fabric  filters  are  the most  widely  used pieces  of equipment for
        brass/bronze furnace air pollution abatement. A typical process description for
        inclusion in  a fabric filter specification is shown in Table 27. The operating
        conditions for each of three sizes of furnaces are given in Table 28. Although
        the specification includes a low efficiency case (89.6 to 93.2%) to  meet the

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE, INC
                                             Table 27

                            FABRIC COLLECTOR PROCESS DESCRIPTION
                FOR BRASS/BRONZE REVERBERATORY FURNACE SPECIFICATION
                The  reverberatory  open-hearth  is an  oil fired  furnace where  the products of
         combustion  and metallic fumes are normally vented directly from the furnace through a
         cooling device to a fabric collector. The furnace is a side charged, non-tilting type, fired with
         low sulfur No. 2 oil. The sulfur content will not exceed 2% by weigh t.

         Hooding
                The hooding shall consist of vents over the side charge door, pour spout and flue for
         general combustion and metallic fumes emission control.

         Cooling

                A "U" tube cooler (not forced draft tube bundle type cooler) shall deliver dust laden
         gases to the I.D. fan. The "U" tube cooler hopper will terminate into 9" screw conveyor.

                Emergency bleed in of ambient air shall be provided to Quench gas temperature to
         the collector. The entering air temperature to the collector will not exceed 270°'F.

                As corrosion may occur  if fluxes contain  compounds of a hygroscopic nature,
         provision for standby heat is required. The heater is to be direct  fired  thermostatically
         controlled.

         Physical Layout — Equipment

                The  furnace is located on an outside wall of the melt building.  Duct work will be
         required to tie into stack that is presently in existence (in case of new installation hooding
         on the vents over the side charge door, pour spout must tie into stack or flue from main
         furnace). The stack shall be capped with a hand operated damper for emergency by-pass.
         Take-off from the stack shall be at the 40' above ground level. Duct work will enter the "U"
         tube cooler.  Duct work will be mtld steel 1/4"plate construction into the "U" tube cooler.
         The "U" tube cooler will be a minimum of 10 ga with hoppers no less than 3/16"plate.  The
         collector will be provided adequate space in an area 200' x 50" immediately outside the melt
         building.

         Filter Baghouse - Shaker Type

                The  fabric filter shall be a continuous, automatic-, compartment/zed tubular cloth
         filter designed  for uninterrupted service.  The collector is  to  be  arranged in  separate
         compartments which are periodically isolated by individual automatic dampers. There shall
         be at least four individual compartments. The air to  cloth ratio (net) with one compartment
         off for cleaning shall not exceed 2.3:1.

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE, INC
                                             Table 27
                                             (continued)
                The housing shall not be less than 14 ga. Auxiliaries shall include ladders, platforms,
         outside shaker motors and drives, and catwalk access to outside shakers.

                The housing shall be  capable of withstanding a maximum of 20" wg negative
         pressure.

                Hopper discharge equipment shall consist of trough type hoppers employing a 9"
         screw conveyor  (heavy duty) terminating in  a discharge spout. A rotary  lock shall be
         provided for discharge from screw conveyor.

                The control panel shall consist of but not be limited to the following:

                (1)     "U" tube manometer or Magnehelic * gages to indicate pressure drop across
                       each compartment.

                (2)     High temp warning system (alarm).

                (3)     Sequencing timer for shaker drives.

                The fan provided shall be a paddle wheel  or  radial blade heavy duty industrial
         exhauster capable of continuous operation at design conditions.

                The exhauster shall include flanged inlet and outlet clean-out door, heat radiation
         shield on shaft, and drain. Outlet multi-blade manual control damper shall also be provided.

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE, INC
                                          Table  28


                                OPERATING CONDITIONS FOR

                BRASS/BRONZE REVERBERATORY FURNACE  SPECIFICATION
        Three sizes of fabric collectors are to be quoted in accord with the following operating
        conditions.  Two efficiency levels are specified, but it is expected that a single fabric filter
        will be quoted for each size.
        Furnace capacity, ton
        Melting rate, Ib/hr
        Inlet gas volume, ACFM
        Inlet gas temperature, °F
        Inlet loading, Ib/hr
        Inlet loading, gr/ACF
                    Small

                     20
                   5,000
                   2,200
                    270
                     64
                     3.4
Medium

    50
12,500
 5,500
   270
   160
   3.4
  Large

    75
20,000
 8,250
  270
  240
   3.4
        Outlet loading, Ib/hr
        Outlet loading, gr/ACF
        Efficiency, wt. %
Case 1 - LA Process Weight

                   6.67       11.58        16.19
                   0.35        0.24         0.23
                 89.6         92.1         93.2
        Outlet loading, Ib/hr
        Outlet loading, gr/ACF
        Efficiency, wt. %
 Case 2 — High Efficiency

                   0.19         0.47         0.71
                   0.01         0.01         0.01
                  99.7         99.7        99.7

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE,  INC.
        LA-Process Weight requirements,  it would not ordinarily be possible to operate
        at low efficiency because of the dense plume which would be discharged. For
        practical  purposes,  a  fabric filter will  perform in accord with  the  "High
        Efficiency" case, and will not produce a highly visible plume.

               The cost data returned by the  manufacturer  is  shown  in Table 29.
        These costs are plotted using log-log coordinates in Figure 9.

               2)      WET SCRUBBERS FOR BRASS/BRONZE
                      REVERBERATORY  FURNACES

               While wet scrubbers are capable of providing satisfactory air pollution
        abatement  for this  application, they  do not automatically produce  the high
        efficiency levels  achieved by the fabric  filter.  It is necessary to consider the
        efficiency level required when  specifying a  scrubber.  In particular, caution is
        necessary when the scrubber is selected to  meet a process weight limitation
        such  as the  LA-Process Weight  regulation, because  serious  plume opacity
        problems may be encountered at this efficiency level.

               Tables 30 and 31 contain all of the specification material pertinent to
        the wet scrubber application.  In Table 31 both low and high efficiency cases
        are specified, although  only  the  high  efficiency case  is likely  to produce an
        acceptable stack appearance.

               The costs produced in response to the two specified efficiency levels are
        listed in Tables 32  and  33 for the low and  high efficiency cases respectively.
        These figures are plotted in Figures 10 and 11 for ease of interpolation.

               Note  that the  manufacturer  has   responded  to  the  request  for a
        quotation,  but has indicated that the specified  high efficiency level cannot be
        guaranteed without field testing.

               c)      DISCUSSION  OF COSTS FOR BRASS/BRONZE
                      REVERBERATORY FURNACES APPLICATIONS

               Whereas more  rotary lime kilns are equipped with wet scrubbers than
        other types of collectors, the  brass and bronze reverberatory furnaces most
        often have fabric collectors. The reasons for this are apparent from the costs
        given in Tables 29 and 33 and  plotted in Figure 12. The basic  wet scrubber is
        less expensive than the  fabric  collector, but the higher cost of auxiliaries and
        installation  makes  the  scrubber  more  costly than the fabric  collector. In
        addition, the horsepower requirement is substantially  higher for the scrubber.

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS  CLEANING   INSTITUTE,  INC.
                               Table 29
                       Fabric Collector Cost Data for
                    Brass/Bronze Reverberatory Furnaces

INrUKMAl ION
Process Capacity, Ton/Day
Inlet Gas Volume, ACFM
Efficiency, Wt . %
Controlled Emission, Gr/ACF
Type of Charge
i
o
Inlet Gas Temperature, F
System Horsepower !
Equipment Cost, $ i
A. Collector i
B. Auxiliaries ;
C. Gas Conditioning Equipment
D. Waste Equipment
E. Other
Total
Total Installation Cost, $
A. Grass-Roots
B. Add-On ;
Expected Life, Years
Operating and Maintenance
Requirements $/year
FABRIC FILTER
SMALL
20
2,200
99.7
.01
Scrap §
Dross
270
21
10,800
1,332
11,570
450
24,152
21,800
15
1,368
MEDIUM
50
5,500
99.7
.01
Scrap §
Dross
270
48
15,470
2,206
15,890
450
34,016
30,800
15
1,512
LARGE
80
8,250
99.7
.01
Scrap §
Dross
270
84
19,630
3 122
22,'400
525
45,677
36,500
15
2,232

-------
INDUSTRIAL  GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC
                              Figure 9
                       Costs of Fabric Collectors for
                    Brass/Bronze Reverberatory Furnaces
    rt
    O
    Q
    in
    -O
o

H

i
    O
    u
       200
       100
        70
        50
     30
        20
        10
         H-
             ffi:

                   Turnkey Installation
                   For  Grass Roots

                                                             P;Ur

Fabric Filter §

Auxiliary  Equipment
                                         Fabric  Filter i:

                                           Only
                      20              50      80



                      Process  Capacity, Ton/Day
                                                          200

-------
INDUSTRIAL     GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE, INC
                                             Table 30

                          WET SCRUBBER  PROCESS DESCRIPTION  FOR

                  BRASS/BRONZE REVERBERATORY FURNACE SPECIFICATION
                The  reverberatory open-hearth  is  an oil  fired furnace  where  the products  of
         combustion  and metallic  fumes are normally vented directly from the furnace  to  the
         scrubber. The furnace is side charged, non-tilting type, fired with low sulfur No. 2 oil. The
         sulfur content will not exceed 2% by weight.

         Hooding

                The hooding shall consist of vents over the side charge door, pour spout and flue for
         general combustion and metallic fumes emission control.

         Physical Layout — Equipment

                The furnace is located on an outside wall of the melt building. Duct work  will be
         required to tie into stack  that is presently in existence (in case of new installation hooding
         on the vents over the side charge door, pour spout must tie into stack or flue from main
         furnace). The stack shall  be capped with a hand operated damper for emergency by-pass.
         Take-off from  the stack shall be at the 40'  above ground level. Duct work will be mild steel
         1/4" plate where unwetted by scrubbing liquor and 304 ss. or equivalent where wetted. The
         scrubber will be provided adequate space in an area 200' x 50' immediately outside the melt
         building.

         Wet Collector Spec.

                The  wet collector shall be  a Venturi-type  scrubber capable  of developing  the
         necessary pressure drop to scrub gases of contaminants to meet outlet emissions specified in
         the operating conditions.

                The  Venturi  scrubber shall consist of the  converging and diverging section. The
         converging  section causes the inlet  gas to be accelerated  to high velocity where water
         introduced to  the throat  is atomized and the contaminant particles are  trapped. The gas
         stream is decelerated in the diverging section. The water droplets are removed from  the gas
         stream in the mist separator.

                The  Venturi  scrubber and cyclonic  separator are  to be constructed  of 304  ss.
         wherever wetted by the scrubbing liquor. The mist eliminator shall be a cone-bottom center
         drained vessel to avoid settling or clogging.

                Pumps shall be rubber lined carbon steel or equivalent.

                Fan  shall  be capable of developing  the necessary  static pressure to perform  in
         accordance with the operating conditions. The ductwork static pressure is 8" wg.

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS CLEANING    INSTITUTE,  INC
                                         Table 30
                                         (continued)
              The pressure drop shall be no less than 50" wg to meet the LA County costs and
        no less than 60" wg to meet the higher efficiency requirement.

        Auxiliaries

              For purposes of this  quotation, the  following are to be considered as auxiliary
        equipment:

           (1)  fan and drive
           (2)  pumps and drives
           (3)  external piping
           (4)  dampers
           (5)  controls

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE, INC.
                                        Table 31


                      WET SCRUBBER  OPERATING  CONDITIONS FOR

               BRASS/BRONZE REVERBERATORY FURNACE SPECIFICATION
       Three sizes of scrubbers are to be quoted in accord with the following operating conditions.
       Two efficiency levels are to be quoted for each size.
                                                     Small
                              Medium
       Furnace capacity, ton
       Melting rate, Ib/hr
       Inlet gas volume, ACFM
       Inlet gas temperature °F
       Inlet loading, Ib/hr
       Inlet loading, gr/ACF
       Outlet gas volume, ACFM
       Outlet gas temp., °F
Large
20
5,000
7,520
2,000
64
1.01
3,320
172
50
12,500
18,600
2,000
160
1.01
8,150
172
75
20,000
27,800
2,000
240
1.01
12,200
172
       Outlet loading, Ib/hr
       Outlet loading, gr/ACF
       Efficiency, wt. %
Case 1 — LA Process Weight

                  6.67        11.58        16.19
                  0.23         0.17         0.15
                 89.6         92.7         93.2
       Outlet loading, Ib/hr
       Outlet loading, gr/ACF
       Efficiency, wt. %
Case 2 — High Efficiency

                  0.28         0.70         1.04
                  0.01         0.01         0.01
                 99.6        99.6         99.6

-------
   INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC
                                   Table 32

                           Wet Scrubber Cost Data for
                        Brass/Bronze Reverberation Furnace
                              (LA-Process Weight)
INFORMATION

Process Capacity, Ton/Day
Inlet Gas Volume, ACFM
Efficiency, Wt . \
Controlled Emission, gr /ACF
Type of Charge
Inlet Gas Temperature, F
System Horsepower BHP at start up
Equipment Cost, $
A. Collector § Quencher
B. 3'04 S.S. Exhauster
C. Pipe
D. 304 S.S. Pump $ Motor
E. Fan § Pump Motor Starter
Total
Installation Cost,, $ , , •, •
A. Grass-Roots (not including
B. Add-On equip.) .
Expected Life, Years
Operating and Maintenance
$/year
WET
SMALL
20
3,320
89.6*
0.23
Scrap
2,000
57
32
5,025
14,500
550
646
347
21,068
47,200
55,200
10
600
SCRUBBER
MEDIUM
50
8,150
92.7*
0.17
Scrap
2,000
140
77
9,890
20,000
670
926
728
32,214
72,300
94,300
10
600

LARGE
75
12,200
93.2*
0.15
Scrap
2,000
207
114
13,795
21,400
800
1,252
2,006
39,253
88,000
104,000
10
600
*  This efficiency will be  exceeded at the  horsepower specified.

-------
   INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC.
                                  Table 33

                          Wet Scrubber Cost Data for
                        Brass/Bronze Reverberatory Furnace
                               (High Efficiency)
INFORMATION

Process Capacity, Ton/Day
Inlet Gas Volume, ACFM
Efficiency, Wt.%
Controlled Emission, gr/ACF
Type of Charge
Inlet Gas Temperature, F
Syste* Horsepower Jg ^r^?ati
Equipment Cost, $
A. Collector § Quencher
B. 304 S.S. Exhauster
C. Pipe
D. 304 S.S. Pump § Motor
E. F'an §' Pump Motor Starter
Total
Installation Cost, $
A. Grass-Roots
B. Add-On
Expected Life, Years
Operating and Maintenance
$/year
WET
SMALL
20
3,320
99.6*
0.01
Scrap
2,000
66
>n 36
5,180
21,050
550
646
347
27,773
62,300
70,300
10
600
SCRUBBER
MEDIUM
50
8,150
99.6*
0.01
Scrap
2,000
163
90
9,980
23,000
670
926
728
35,304
79,300
91,300
10
600

LARGE
75
12,200
99.6*
0.01
Scrap
2,000
240
132
13,900
32,050
800
1,252
2^006
50,008
112,500
128,500
10
600
*  This efficiency guarantee  contingent upon field sampling.

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING  INSTITUTE,  INC
                              Figure 10


                        Costs of Wet Scrubbers for


                     Brass/Bronze Reverberatory Furnaces

                          (LA—Process Weight)
     f-l
     rt
     o
     Q

     "4-1
     O
o

H

i
        200 _
        100
          70
     50
          30
          20
          10
                   # Turnkey Installation
                    "- for  Grass Roots Plant
                       i
                   •tt::
                             li
                  Wet Scrubber  §
                  Auxiliary Equipment
                                                i

                                                  1:1
i
                                                    '4-T-I-
                                                           I
ffl
                                                              Ttttr
                                                                m
                                           Wet Scrubber
                                             Only
                         20              50      80

                        Process  Capacity, Ton/Day
                                                           200

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS  CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC
                               Figure 11
                         Costs of Wet Scrubbers for
                     Brass/Bronze Reverberatory Furnaces
                            (High Efficiency)
L- U \J
100 -
* 70 -
i— i
o
Q
st - Thousands of
t-o W in
O O O
1 1 1
o
u
10 •
o ^1





-
_
~







1
zhitifc-dirtti: tirm|pffi::|i^:^:^:.:
f-~
E
-

I


••









i — '
-
h-
f?
P













u|
l-

-

Turnkey Installation

ior UP ass KOOLS r j.anu


1 llu l.i'1
; | i i ' li 	 " ",•*

| ! Ill INI 1 I | ; 1 " .<• " |

' i ' f ' i i 1 ' ' 1 1 lli 1 I

1 l'£yTrTtT 	 I "* 	 i£±I" "E"E

^' oTur ^ : mlltMMpTOtf^
1 : : : ' ! ' ! ' ' i 1 1 1 III





=j=======gii|iii!iilit Wet Sen

! | ' '
i 	 .- - j « 1 » j | 	 	 	 	 ,

: I |EE:::::::::::::| =5s:r::"E| "tfm
. L 	 . . I . .... 4. ! -- • 	 - - 	 	 I •
. , 	 . , i ^ . ! 	 	 	 	 	






"" T I 	
t~:j 	 	 J ±


1+ ^"T'l 	 i i T



i — I---U — i" • ^ — H 	 	 ""
abber § == = p==i^:EEEE;
T Equipment EEEEEEEEEEEEIEE;
Wet Scrubber :±::::±:

uniy 	
:::::::::::::: :::: ___:::+::::::::::::
                         20
            50
80
100
     88

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING  INSTITUTE, INC
                               Figure 12
                      Comparison of Abatement Costs
                   for Brass/Bronze Reverberatory Furnaces
                       (Based on Turnkey Installation)
300 "I 1 1 |[[|l||||^m^4^l|||l|l||[|||[[|l[M|
200 - = = EEE = = E||:iE:::::;:::::::; 	 , EEEEEiEEEi iiiii
— -•*—' — iiii •••(- j 1 I I 1 I 44 II 1 1 1 1 1 »4!l It 1 1 1 IU-J"t * ' * * -
1/1 ~ Scrubber Installation



f— ' ' : i i ii 1 1
, :: 	 ~ :.±flt tti'ii "-.."",••'
" _ ___±_T 	 tt--II. . t 	 ..•'.-.
0 | ,,•'
Q- \ i t* '
! , i 1 ! L .
^ 100 - -^+p^ 4 -== 	 to 	 	
O -4::'= — 7T— r-r-ji: '-f-|:::"F :;:r--:::: --|
§ 70 ^gyii:::;;;!;:;!;:::;: |:;;;;:::::;:
t/i --: 	 1 	 r~+* 	 -•" 	 *• -*- 	 ;•'•'
O = = = = = = :::=EE = ;EE:;;:::;:::::::::;::: ?h:::;E:::
H 50 -iiiiiiiEHm=i:|i:i=p!ii!:!;
E|iMiEJEEEJ!pi!!||l;; EIEEEMEE;;
"i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 iHllilllllHllilllllllllll 1 1 1 IHIIIIIIIII
o 	 + 	 T 	 	 ±4-
- 30 .EEhE~-!i;!iii;ii:;ii;;:::!:;;;;: 111-11;;!::;:
20 -EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEiiliiiiiiiiii! EEEEEEEEEiiiiii






	 -;;:;•' 	 	
	 -;';•*•• 	 ^ 	 "

__.,..! 	 - _ 	 -I
-••-, ' ' 	 	 	 	 1 	 " •
i '

i
t
• ^ -I- '
? 1
	 	 B2 	 	 	 	 . 	 ...
t- • 	 	 	 --•
Fabric Collector pmiml
Grass Roots Plant -.----.-.-.--i-.:





                       20
        50       80             100
Process Capacity, Ton/Day


-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE, INC
              While these circumstances indicate a fabric collector most economical
       for the conditions specified in this study, some circumstances favor scrubbers.
       For  example,  if acidic materials from  burnout  or  sweating operations are
       included in the gas stream discharged into the collector, it may be necessary to
       use a scrubber to control the gas emission, or to eliminate the possibility of
       deterioration of the bags. In particular, if sulfur dioxide emissions from a lead
       smelting operation are to be included  in a  common air pollution  control
       system, the scrubber may be required for SC>2 control  in the future.  In this case
       the scrubber cost would be higher than shown because of the need for special
       materials of construction.
          REFERENCES FOR BRASS/BRONZE REVERBERATORY SECTION


              1.     Brass and Bronze Ingot Institute and National Air Pollution
                        Control Administration, "Air Pollution Aspects of Brass
                        and Bronze Smelting and Refining Industry" (U.S. Dept.
                        of H.E.W., Public Health Service, August, 1969, p. 9

              2.     J. A. Danielson, "Air Pollution Engineering Manual"
                        (U.S. Dept. of H.E.W., Public Health Service, Publication
                        No. 999-AP-40, 1967), p. 235

              3.     American Conference of Governmental and Industrial Hygienists,
                        "Industrial Ventilation" (Library of Congress Catalog Card
                        Number: 62-12929,  11th Edition, 1970), p. 10-11

              4.     IGCI Publication  F2, "Fundamentals of Fabric Collectors
                        and Glossary of Terms", IGCI, Box 448, Rye, N.Y.

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING    INSTITUTE, INC.
       3.
AIR POLLUTION CONTROL FOR LEAD CUPOLAS
       a.
PROCESS DESCRIPTION
             The lead blast furnace or cupola is a vertical production furnace similar
       to the iron cupolas used in ferrous smelting practice. Unlike the reverberatory
       furnace, the cupola serves a very specific function. The cupola is used to reduce
       oxidized  metal.  Frequently,  metal  scrap   is  charged  to  the  cupola  in
       combination with  lead dross or other forms of oxide. However, because the
       blast furnace is less efficient  in retaining the metal, and cannot be used for
       purification of the molten metal, it  is more  common to charge scrap for
       melting and purification to a reverberatory furnace.
       1)
MANUFACTURING ASPECTS
              Figure 13 is a process flow sketch for a typical  lead cupola. Charge
       stock is fed at the  top of the furnace through the charging doors. The  lower
       section of the furnace is water cooled, and the upper section consists entirely
       of  refractory. The furnace  is charged with a mixture of lead oxide dross and
       slag, limestone, coke, and some scrap cast iron. Air is injected through tuyeres
       in the bottom of the furnace and combustion of the coke serves as the source
       of  heat for the melting and reduction process. Additional limestone, dross and
       coke are added  through the charging door toward the top of the cupola and
       molten metal is  tapped off  at the bottom. The limestone and iron form  a slag
       that reduces the oxidation of the molten lead. The slag is tapped  periodically,
       and it is customary  to maintain a continuous flow of lead from the bottom of
       the cupola. The process is  "semi-continuous" in that charge is added over a
       period  of one or two days  and product  is withdrawn  nearly continuously
       during this period.

                         CHARGE STOCK AND  PRODUCTS

              Cupola charge stock consists of the lead oxide to be reduced, plus coke,
       limestone, scrap iron and rerun slag. The principal sources of the lead oxide are

                    a)     Reverberatory furnace dross
                    b)     Melt  furnace dross
                    c)     Reverberatory furnace slag

              The   drosses may  contain  substantial  amounts of  lead  entrained
       mechanically in  the lead oxide. Also, there may be a variety of metal oxides
       from melting operations in which lead is  alloyed with other materials. One

-------
CD
Ni
        NATURAL GAS
      AFTERBURNER -
        TORCH
                                     COOLING
                                      WATER
                                        SPRAY
                           FLUE GAS
XING
kTER ^
UT
AIR
BLAST
JLING »
FER IN
/
* * * *
« A . ,
,>' ?',
&• * * *
v • • •
xfr
y t • ^4

^%
s
~on
•»«,
**
1
CHARG
MATERIl
5^ LEAD
^ PRODUCT
1 1
      SCRUBBER

VENTURI    MIST
         SEPARATOR
                                                                                   FAN
                                                    WATER SLURRY
                                                      TO SETTLING
                                                        POND
                                                                             MAKE-UP
                                                                             WATER
                                                  Figure 13


-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS CLEANING    INSTITUTE, INC
       common source is the lead oxide drosses produced in letter press printing using
       lead-tin-antimony typemetal.

              The composition of a typical cupola charge is shown in Table 34. This
       table also gives a rough measure of the feed rates for a 25T/D cupola.

              The principal product of the lead cupola is antimonial or "hard lead".
       Antimony-containing  lead  alloys  have  better  physical  properties  at  low
       temperatures — up to the boiling point of water — and antimony is included in
       many, alloys where the physical strength is important. Lead-antimony alloys
       have many uses such as in piping, stereotype plate production in printing, etc.
       These alloys are frequently unsuitable for very corrosive services, and must be
       refined in a reverberatory or pot furnace to produce a high purity or "chemical
       lead". The inclusion of antimony lowers the melting point of the alloy, which
       makes it  more suitable for lead stereotype plates and less suitable  for high
       temperature structural  uses. The composition  of hard  lead, and some of the
       physical properties are given in Table 35.

              High  purity lead alloys are usually  specified for construction of
       chemical equipment resistant to  acids. These alloys are described as "chemical
       lead", "acid lead", etc. These alloys, which cannot be produced directly from
       the cupola, are described in more detail in the section on  lead reverberatory
       furnaces.

              About three-fourths of the charge  is withdrawn as product with the
       remaining material tapped off intermittently as slag or lost with the  flue gas.
       Some of the slag  is retained for recharging to the furnace and the remainder
       discarded. The hard lead may be sold directly as a product, or charged to either
       reverberatory  or crucible type furnaces for further refining to remove the
       metallic impurities by oxidation.

                                     EQUIPMENT

              The cupola is an extremely simple apparatus from a mechanical design
       standpoint.  It consists of a  vertical shaft into which the charge materials are
       dumped. The cupolas used in ferrous smelting are lined with refractory over the
       entire length to withstand the high temperatures required to melt cast iron. For
       lead applications the cupola operates at much lower temperatures and the
       lower section can be of refractory-lined or water-cooled steel construction.

              A molten metal level is maintained at the bottom, above which a mixed
       mass of charge solids is contacted with air to burn the fuel, reduce the  lead

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC.
                                 Table 34
                   Typical Composition of Lead Cupola Charge
      Component
      Dross
          (15%) Metallic Lead
              Pb
              Sb
              Sm
          (85%) Metal Oxides
              PbO
              SbO
              SnO
      Rerun Slag

      Scrap Iron

      Limestone

      Coke
 Wt. %
of Total
  82.5
 Lb/Hr
Average

 2200
4.5
4.5
3.0
5.5
120
120
80
150
                                            100.0
              2670

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS  CLEANING   INSTITUTE,  INC
                                    Table 35
                        Typical  Properties of Cast Hard  Lead
               Composition





               Lead




               Antimony




               Arsenic




               Tin




               Copper




               Nickel
               Tensile Strength, Ib/in2




               Brinnel Hardness




               Density, Ib/in3




               Specific Gravity




               Melting Point, °F
Wt.  %





 92.5




  6.0




  0.4




  1.0




  0.1




  0.01




100.0







6800




  12




  0.393




 10.9




 554

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS  CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC
       oxide, and melt the product. Relatively high temperatures are reached locally
       in this section, but the gases cool as they pass upward through the fresh charge
       added to the top of the mass.

              The fuel for heating and melting is the coke added with the charge, or
       in alternate loads, at the charging door. This is oxidized with blast air furnished
       by an air compressor to the tuyeres at the bottom of the furnace. If infiltration
       of air at the charge door level were not a factor, the flue gas would consist of
       the  combustion products of the blast  air and  coke, with some additional gas
       released by the decomposition of the metal oxides and the limestone. However
       the  gas flow is usually far in excess of the blast air flow.

              The charge doors are usually  designed to accommodate addition of
       charge  materials  by a bucket which is swung into the  cupola and dumped.
       Other methods of charging include conveyors or chute feeders. In the case of
       bucket feed, the charge  doors  must be large and are frequently  left open or
       removed altogether. This allows a very high rate of air  infiltration into the
       cupola. When  air  pollution control equipment is installed, it is necessary to
       limit infiltration  at this point to  minimize  the  size requirement and  the
       operating cost.

              Torches or gas burners are frequently  installed  in the cupola directly
       above the  charging door to burn carbon monoxide and to abate smoke and
       odor nuisances to some  extent. The afterburner section must have some air
       infiltration to provide for burning the CO, but will be costly to operate without
       good sealing at the charge doors.

                     NATURE OF AIR POLLUTION PROBLEM

              The chemical reactions taking place in the lead blast furnace are:

              (a)     oxidation of coke for heat production according to the reaction

                            C+ 1/2 O2 -"  CO,    or

                            C + 02  + CO2

              (b)     Reaction of carbon with lead dross according to

                            Pb 0 + C  + Pb + CO

              The principal air contaminants produced by the. process are carbon

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE,  INC.
       monoxide  from partial oxidation  of the coke fuel, and  particulate  matter
       entrained  by the highly agitated gases passing through the vertical shaft. The
       particulate contaminant consists mainly of lead oxide, but also has iron oxide,
       and oxides of the metals which are constituents in the hard lead. Other charge
       constituents may also be mechanically entrained. In addition there will be some
       sulfur dioxide and carbonaceous material.

              In addition to the particulate  matter entrained by the turbulent flow of
       gases upward through the charge materials, there will be some vaporization of
       lead, antimony,  and other metals, which condense as metal fumes at the lower
       temperature  in  the exhaust system.  The vapor pressure of these  metals is a
       measure of the tendency to form vapors in the furnace. Table 36  illustrates the
       concentration of lead and antimony in equilibrium with the flue gas from the
       cupola as a  function of temperature. Vapor pressures are  usually given  in
       millimeters  of   mercury or  atmospheres;  however, in this case they  are
       calculated  in terms of  the grain loading they  will produce at atmospheric
       pressure.
       2)
AIR POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT
              In order to reduce the emission of smoke and carbon monoxide, the
       cupola should  be equipped with an afterburning section  directly above the
       charging  door. This section should be sufficiently tall to allow for a residence
       time  of  approximately  0.5 seconds or so for the gases leaving the smelting
       section of the cupola. It should be equipped with gas burners to boost the gas
       temperature to the 1200°F level during start up, and provide an ignition source
       at other  times  as required. It is apparent that excessive leakage inward at the
       charging  door will increase the fuel requirements for the afterburning section
       significantly, and should  therefore be  avoided.  For cupolas  without air
       pollution control  equipment, the  natural  draft  produced  by  the  high gas
       temperature provides adequate ventilation at the charge door when it is open.
       However, when air pollution control equipment is added after the afterburner,
       it is necessary to set the gas flow through this section by the accurate sizing of
       the fan  and air pollution  control  device. The selection  of a gas flow rate
       through the air pollution control device is one of the critical steps in the design
       of the air pollution control system.  It must satisfy the requirements for inward
       ventilation  at  the charging  door  when it  is open, but not establish an
       uneconomically high rate of ventilation.

                                  GAS FLOW RATE

              The gas flow rate leaving the  cupola when ventilation at the charge  door

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS  CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC.
                                   Table 36
                          Calculated Concentrations of
                           Lead and Antimony Fume
       Temp.,°F
                              Lead
Metal
Fume
 PPM
 Grain
Loading
gr/SCF
                               Antimony
Metal
Fume
PPM
 Grain
Loading
 ar/SCF
         1150
         1175
         1200
         1225
         1250
         1275
         1300
         1325
23.69
28.04
33.01
38.68
45.11
52.38
60.56
69.74
.0895
.1059
.1247
.1461
.1704
.1979
.2288
.2634
 78.25
 92.65
109.13
127.93
149.27
173.39
200.57
231.05
.1737
.2056
.2422
.2840
.3313
.3849
.4452
.5128

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC
        is adequate but  not  excessive should be carefully measured  using accepted
        source testing techniques before equipment is selected for air pollution control.
        For budgetary purposes, the approximate size  may  be  established  on the
        assumption that  about 1 SCF will  be required per pound  of charge to the
        cupola. This gas will leave the cupola at the charge door level on the order of
        1200 -  1500°F. Afterburning in  an incineration section  above the charge door
        may increase  the temperature to as high as 2000° F. The gas flow leaving the
        cupola  is somewhat less for each pound of charge than would be the case for a
        reverberatory  furnace, because of the ability of the cupola to transfer heat to
        the charge material before it reaches melting temperature.  Also, in the cupola
        the fuel is burned with less than the theoretical amount of  air in order to
        produce a  reducing atmosphere.  Both of these factors tend to limit the rate of
        generation of flue gas for a given charging rate.

                               PARTICULATE LOADING

               The fume loading  leaving the afterburning section is  likely  to be
        extremely  high for the cupola. As much as 10% of the material charged to the
        furnace may  be  entrained in  the flue gas and carried   into  the  air  pollution
        control equipment. A good average figure is 7% of the  total  charge.  The gases
        leaving the cupola are ordinarily cooled by infiltration of ambient  air rather
        than  by heat exchange  or quenching with water if a fabric filter is to be
        installed as the air pollution control device. In this case, some  dilution air can
        be withdrawn from a hood over the charging door and additional dilution air
        taken  in immediately  at the beginning of the duct to  the fabric filter. This
        reduces the temperature for which  the duct as well  as  the  filter must be
        designed. Special care must  be  taken in designing  the system  to  avoid the
        possibility  of  ignition  of the filter bags in the event that the ventilating fan
        stops,  or when the exit temperature becomes excessive during "burn down" at
        the end of  a run.

               Where a wet scrubber is to be installed to collect the paniculate matter,
        it is possible to limit the size of the  scrubbing equipment by using  water for
        quenching  rather than by using infiltration air. The point of introduction of the
        quench water may be immediately after the afterburning section of the cupola
        in which case the duct can be sized for a relatively low gas volume but must be
        made of corrosion-resistant material such as a refractory-lined  carbon steel or
        stainless steel. The ducting to the scrubber may be made  to withstand the
        maximum  temperature expected at the top of the cupola, and the  water supply
        introduced  immediately ahead of the  scrubber, or in the scrubber throat itself.

               For a  wet scrubber, the grain  loading will  be  considerably higher than

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE, INC.
        for the fabric filter with introduction of quench air.

                                 SPECIAL  PROBLEMS

               Several  problems   associate   themselves  specifically  with  cupola
        operation in a  secondary smelting plant. These are discussed in some detail in
        the following paragraphs.

               The geometry of the cupola makes the  estimation of the proper gas
        flow rate  for  the air pollution control equipment one of the most difficult
        problems. This is because the ventilation rate measured at the top of the charge
        door for the untreated cupola  may be many times the minimum  requirement
        for correct  ventilation.  Prior  to  the installation of  air pollution  control
        equipment, there is no reason to limit the gas flow at this point. However, the
        addition of an afterburning section has a fuel  requirement associated with it if
        too much infiltration air is allowed at the charge door level. Even more costly is
        the design  of  particulate  collection equipment to handle several  times  the
        minimum gas flow required. For this reason, it is not always possible to select a
        proper gas flow for the air pollution abatement system  by performing a source
        test on the untreated cupola.  In addition,  it is necessary to make a careful
        estimate of the minimum ventilating rate which will be acceptable at the charge
        door prior to the selection of abatement equipment.

               Another problem peculiar to the cupola  involves the use of solid fuel.
        Whereas reverberatory furnaces and  crucibles  are frequently gas fired and
        subject  to  nearly instantaneous control of the fuel and  air rates used  for
        combustion, the cupola is fired by  the addition of coke in batches at  the
        charging door. After a load of coke  has been dumped into the  cupola, it is
        difficult to  control  the  combustion  if an emergency situation  arises. For
        example, if the ventilating  fan power  fails  it is not possible  to have  the
        combustion  cut  back instantaneously  without  producing  a very  serious
        operating  problem.   For this  reason,  the  provisions  for  operating  in high
        temperature emergency situations without damage to the air pollution control
        equipment should be  considered in the  initial design.

               When fabric  filters  are  used  for collection of  the oxide particulate
        materials,  the disposal  problem  is minimized  because  the oxides  can be
        recharged to the cupola. However, when wet scrubbing systems are  utilized, the
        oxides are recovered in a dilute slurry which may be difficult to recycle. The
        simplest mechanism for handling the recovered  material is shown in the flow
        scheme in Figure 13, where the slurry is simply conducted to a settling  pond
        where  it is allowed to stand for a minimum  of several days. The particulate

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE, INC.
        matter settles to the bottom and may be dredged out, and air dried for recycle
        to the cupola. The other alternatives  involve using an intermediate settler and
        filter, or a filter alone for separation of the oxides from the scrubbing medium.
        Ordinarily, it is not possible to return the water to the sewage system or to a
        natural  body of water with the substantial concentration  of lead compounds.
        b.
SPECIFICATIONS AND COSTS
               The lead blast furnace is frequently treated in combination with other
        furnaces in a secondary lead plant. When this is done, it is possible to use a
        single  air  pollution control  system to  service several  applications.  The
        specifications written for IGCI member companies to use in quoting equipment
        prices  were based on  the system serving  the cupola alone,  but could be
        modified to handle a reverberatory furnace or a sweating furnace without much
        additional cost.

               The cupola effluent can be treated satisfactorily by either a fabric filter
        or a scrubber of adequate design. The fabric filter will provide positive control
        of particulate emissions to a low level, but has some disadvantages relating to
        the unstable operating conditions of the  cupola furnace. Condensation during
        shutdown and possible temperature surges are examples.

               The specifications for the fabric filter quote are given in  Table 37. This
        indicates that  all  of the cooling must be done by air contact and dilution,
        rather than water  quenching, to protect the  filter from plugging with wet cake
        if temperature drops suddenly. The operating conditions are given  in Table 38.
        As in the  previous sections of this report, the complete specification consisted
        of these two pages plus the general conditions in Appendix IV.

               The  equipment  and  installation costs submitted  by the  member
        companies are given in Table 39. Only a  single response was made for both the
        LA - Process Weight and the High Efficiency cases, as was true of all the fabric
        applications. The costs are plotted as a function of size in Figure  14.

               The process description and the operating conditions were modified for
        the wet scrubber  because of the use of a spray quench in  this case.  The
        description and operating conditions  are given in  Tables 40 and  41,  and the
        member company response in Tables 42 and 43. These costs  are plotted in
        Figure  15.

-------
INDUSTRIAL     GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE,  INC.
                                             Table 37

                           FABRIC COLLECTOR  PROCESS DESCRIPTION

                               FOR LEAD  CUPOLA SPECIFICATION

                The fabric  filter is to serve a lead cupola or blast furnace charging the following
         materials:
                              rerun slag
                              scrap cast iron
                              limestone
                              coke
                              dross and slag
 4.5%
 4.5%
 3.0%
 5.5%
82.5%

100.0%
                The flue gas exiting the cupola is passed through an afterburning section in which
          torches ignite the carbon monoxide and other combustibles produced in the cupola. This
          section is immediately above the charging door and utilizes air infiltration at the charge door
          to provide sufficient oxygen for combustion.

                Immediately following the afterburner section, additional air is drawn into the
          system to decrease the temperature level to the specified temperature for the fabric filter.
          The cooled gases are then passed through carbon steel ducts through the wall of the building
          to a fabric filter located outside.  The filter is to be located at ground level, adjacent to the
          building  with sufficient elevation to provide 8' of clearance beneath the dust hopper valve
          for truck access. The fan following the filter will be located on a shed roof 28' above grade
          and will discharge into a new 70' stack.

                The fabric filter is to operate in such a manner that a single compartment (with no
          more than one quarter of the total collecting surface area) can be isolated for shaking. The
          hopper is  to have sufficient  capacity to hold the dust collected  over a 24 hour period
          without  interfering with normal operation of the  collector. The  hopper  valve is to be
          included in the filter quotation.

                Dacron tubular bags shall be used with a gas/cloth ratio of 1.0 FPM/FT* or less at
          operating conditions.

                For purposes of this quotation, the following shall be considered to be auxiliary
          equipment:

                (1)    Fan and Drive

                (2)    Dampers

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC
                                          Table 38


                        FABRIC COLLECTOR OPERATING  CONDITIONS

                             FOR LEAD  CUPOLA  SPECIFICATION
        Three sizes of fabric collectors are to be quoted.  While  two levels of efficiency are
        specified, it is assumed that a single fabric collector quotation will be supplied for each size.
        Furnace Capacity, ton/day
        Process weight (charge), Ib/hr
        Inlet gas volume, ACFM
        Inlet gas temperature, °F
        Inlet loading, Ib/hr
        Inlet loading, gr/ACF
  Small

    12
 1,300
 5,000
   270
   115
  2.68
Medium

    25
 2,670
10,000
   270
   230
  2.68
  Large

    50
 5,340
20,000
   270
   460
  2.68
                                   Case 1 - LA Process Weight
        Outlet loading, Ib/hr
        Outlet loading, gr/ACF
        Efficiency, wt. %
 3.26
 0.076
96.9
 4.80
 0.056
97.9
 6.92
 0.040
98.5
                                    Case 2 — High Efficiency
         Outlet loading, Ib/hr
         Outlet loading, gr/ACF
         Efficiency, wt. %
 1.29
 0.03
98.9
 2.57
 0.03
98.9
 5.15
 0.03
98.9

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC.
                             Table 39
                       Fabric Collector Cost Data
                          for Lead Cupola
INFORMATION
Process Capacity, Ton/Day
Inlet Gas Volume, ACFM
Efficiency, Wt. %
Controlled Emission, gr/ACF
Type of Charge
Inlet Gas Temperature, F
System Horsepower
Equipment Cost, $
A. Collector
B. Auxiliaries
C. Gas Conditioning Equipment ;
D. Waste Equipment
E. Other :
Total
Installation Cost, $
A. Grass-Roots
B. Add-On
Expected Life, Years
Operating and Maintenance $/year
FABRIC FILTER
SMALL
12
5,000
98.9
.03
D£?i§ *
270
22
12' ,'254
1,195
3,100
450
16,999
13,428

10
1,556
MEDIUM
25
10,000
98.9
.03
Dross §
SI aa
270
33.5
16,813
2,283
4,000
450
23,536
19,022

10
2,232
LARGE
50
20,000
98.9
.03
Dross $
Slaa
270
65.5
25,429
3,347
4,500
525
33,801
27,265

10
3,836

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE,  INC.
                             Figure 14


                        Cost of Fabric Collectors


                          for Lead Cupola
          200
      V)
      ^
      rt
      o
      Q

      H-i
      O

      in
      rt
      (/>
      3
      O
      V)
      O



00

70
30
20









i n
1U _;


























1
i



















'urnkey Installatio
'or Grass Roots Pla
EEEEE:EEEEE = E^i;;; 	 ; EEEEE!
'^•fflfflili,
	 	 -fl»l 	 	
I'! 	 | 	
	
::::.; ::::; : ufl

i ' r\*.
;i ' Or





9







	 . 	 ,t 	 	
n :::: ;;:?:::::::::::,:::
nt :::i i :I::;E::::;;;;;;;;:;;;;
Fabric Filter §
Auxiliary Equipment
. . , 	 ._,(,.-.. 	
j i ' ' i ' ' ~(B """" 	 '


LUX J.C rxxucr --• 	
i ,, '
ly ..








             10
12     25           50        -100


  Process Capacity, Ton/Day

-------
INDUSTRIAL     GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE,  INC.
                                             Table  40

                            WET SCRUBBER PROCESS DESCRIPTION

                              FOR  LEAD  CUPOLA SPECIFICATION

                The scrubber is to serve a lead cupola charging the following materials:
                              rerun slag
                              scrap cast iron
                              limestone
                              coke
                              dross and slag
  4.5%
  4.5%
  3.0%
  5.5%
 82.5%

100.0%
                The flue gas exiting the cupola is passed through an afterburning section in which
         torches ignite the carbon monoxide and other combustibles produced in the cupola.  This
         section is immediately above the charging door and utilizes air infiltration at the door to
         provide sufficient oxygen for combustion.

                Immediately following the afterburner, a spray quench is provided to reduce the gas
         temperature to the 500°F level.  The cooled gases are passed through carbon steel ducts
         through the wall of the building at an elevation of 20' above grade and into the scrubber.
         The scrubber is to be located in a clear area adjacent to the building. The fan  will be located
         after the scrubber on an adjacent shed roof approximately 20' above grade and will discharge
         into a new 70' stack.

                The ductwork after the quench section is to be 304 stainless steel or have equivalent
         corrosion resistant properties. The scrubber is to be constructed of 304 L or equivalent
         stainless steel wherever wetted by the scrubbing liquor.

                The external piping and pumps will be rubber-lined carbon steel or equivalent. The
         pump is to be equipped with fresh water flushed glands to prevent damage to the packing.
         The liquor containing the collected paniculate matter is to be discharged into a settling pond
         within 100' of the scrubber. The scrubber pressure drop shall be no less than 50" we (or
         equivalent energy input) for the LA-Process weight specification, and no less than 60" we
         (or equivalent energy input) for the high efficiency case.

                For purposes of this quotation, auxiliaries shall include:

                (1)    Fan

                (2)    Pump or pumps

                (3)    External piping

                (4)    Controls

                (5)    Dampers

-------
INDUSTRIAL     GAS CLEANING    INSTITUTE, INC
                                         Table 41


                        WET  SCRUBBER OPERATING CONDITIONS

                           FOR LEAD  CUPOLA SPECIFICATION


       Three sizes of scrubbers are to be quoted for each of two levels of efficiency.
       Furnace Capacity, ton
       Production rate, Ib/hr
       Process weight rate, Ib/hr
       Inlet gas volume, ACFM
       Inlet gas temperature, °F
       Inlet loading, Ib/hr
       Inlet loading, gr/ACF
       Outlet gas volume, ACFM
       Outlet gas temperature, °F
                   Small

                     12
                   1,000
                   1,300
                   3,675
                    500
                    115
                   3.65
                   3,550
                    190
Medium

    25
 2,000
 2,670
 7,350
   500
   230
  3.65
 7,100
   190
  Large

   50
 4,000
 5,340
14,700
  500
  460
  3.65
14,200
  190
       Outlet loading, Ib/hr
       Outlet loading, gr/ACF
       Efficiency, wt. %
Case 1 - LA Process Weight

                   3.26         4.80         6.92
                   0.11         0.079        0.057
                 96.9         97.9         98.5
       Outlet loading, Ib/hr
       Outlet loading, gr/ACF
       Efficiency, wt. %
 Case 2 — High Efficiency

                   0.91         1.89         3.56
                   0.03         0.03         0.03
                  99.2         99.2         99.2

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS  CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC
                              Table 42
                        Wet Scrubber Cost Data
                           for Lead Cupola
                          (LA-Process Weight)
INFORMATION
Process Capacity, Ton/Day
Inlet Gas Volume, ACFM
Efficiency, Wt.%
Controlled Emission, gr/ACF
Type of Charge
Inlet: Gas Temperature, °F
System Horsepower *™ f ?tart UP ,.
' ^ BHP during operati
Equipment Cost, $
A. Collector § Separator
B. 304 S.S. Exhauster
C. Pipe
D. 304 S.S. Pump S Motor
E. Fan- § Pump Motor Starter
Total
Installation Cost, $
A. Grass-Roots
B. Add -On
Expected Life, Years
Operating and Maintenance
Hrs /Month
WET SCRUBBER
SMALL
12
3,675
96.9*
0.11
Dross §
Slag
500
67
on 40
2,900
16,500
935
750
560
19,645
44,200
48,200
10
600
MEDIUM
25
7,350
97.9*
0.079
Dross §
Slag
500
135
81
4,020
16,900
1,000
840
1,080
23,840
53,500
59,500
10
600
LARGE
50
14,700
98.5*
0.057
Dross §
Slag
500
270
161
7,940
22,500
1,060
930
2,542
34,972
•78,500
86^500
10
600
Will probably produce higher efficiency at the
specified pressure drop.

-------
  INDUSTRIAL   GAS  CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC.
                               Table 43
                         Wet Scrubber Cost Data
                            for Lead Cupola
                            (High Efficiency)
INFORMATION

Process Capacity, Ton/Day
Inlet Gas Volume, ACFM
Efficiency, Wt.%
Controlled Emission, gr/ACF
Type of Charge
Inlet Gas Temperature, F
System Horsepower ^ f ?tart UP «. .
7 v BHP during operati
Equipment Cost, $
A. Collector § Separator
B. 304 :S.S. Exhauster **
C. Pipe
D. 304 S.S.. Pump $ Motor
E. Fan § Motor Pump Starter
Ttftal
Installation Cost, $
A. Grass-Roots
B. Add -On
Expected Life, Years
Operating and Maintenance $/year
WET
SMALL
12
3,675
99.2*
0.03
Dross $
Slag
500
85
>n 49
3,050
21,500
935
750
560
26,795
.60,400
64,400
10
600
SCRUBBER
MEDIUM
25
7,350
99.2*
0.03
Dross $
Slag
500
169
98
4,220
23,000
1,000
840
1,080
29,140
66,600
72,600
10
600

LARGE
50
14,700
99.2*
0.03
Dross $
Slag
500
338
196
8,350
29,400
1,060
930
2,542
42,282
95.200
103,200
. 10
600
* Guarantee contingent  upon field testing,
**
   316 L S.S. recommended by manufacturer.

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC
                             Figure 15
       JH
       ri
       o
       Q

       M-l
       O
       rt
       W)
       3
       O

       H
       tn
       o
       u
           300
           200
           100
            70
50
30
            20
            10
                        Costs of Wet Scrubbers


                           for Lead Cupola

                           (High Efficiency)
                       Turnkey Installation
                       for Grass Roots Plant
                          (LA-Process  Weight Case)
Wet Scrubber and
Auxiliary Equipment
                           Wet Scrubber Only
       110
            12     25         50          100


-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING    INSTITUTE, INC.
       c.
DISCUSSION OF COSTS
              Both fabric  filters and  wet scrubbers are used for lead  cupola  air
       pollution abatement. The fabric filter is more costly than the basic scrubber for
       these  applications, but is simpler to install. On the basis of equipment plus
       auxiliaries, the fabric collector is less expensive, and an even  larger difference in
       favor of the filter appears in the "turnkey" figures.

              The scrubber has a significant process advantage in that it can be used
       to remove S02 from  the flue  gas as well as particulate  matter. This may
       become an important advantage in  the future as S02 emission regulations
       become more restrictive. It is most likely to be an important factor when lead
       cupola effluents are combined with those from reverberatory furnaces, or other
       sources which are likely to contain high concentrations of S02.

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC.
                  REFERENCES FOR LEAD CUPOLA SECTION
      1.     Danielson, John A., "Air Pollution Engineering Manual",
                  NAPCA, U.S. Govt. Printing Office, Public Health Service
                  Publication No. 999-AP-40

      2-     Norton, Frederick Harwood, "Refractories",  McGraw-Hill,
                  New York,  4th edition, (1968)
      3.     Perry, John H., "Chemical Engineers Handbook",
                  4th edition, McGraw-Hill, New York (1963)

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE,  INC.
       4.     AIR POLLUTION CONTROL FOR LEAD/ALUMINUM SWEATING
              FURNACES

              a.     PROCESS DESCRIPTIONS

              1)     MANUFACTURING ASPECTS

              The metal recovery process generally referred to as sweating is distinct
       from purely metallurgical processes which involve alloying, fluxing, and the
       like, and is best described as a metal separation process. The sweating process is
       quite literally the sweating, or slow melting, of the low melting constituent
       from a metallic  scrap containing a variety of both metallic and non-metallic
       impurities. Aluminum is  the most common metal recovered by the sweating
       process;  however, tin, lead, zinc, copper, and even iron are reclaimed in this
       manner,  but on a considerably smaller scale.

                     FURNACE EQUIPMENT AND OPERATION

              The type of furnace equipment employed  in  a sweating operation
       depends largely  upon the size of operation. Open  hearth-type reverberatory
       furnaces are used in many large aluminum recovery plants. Smaller rotary or
       tube type reverberatory furnaces are used in small aluminum operations and in
       operations recovering other metals such as lead and tin.  This is not always the
       rule, however. Many times, perhaps due to simplicity of design and operation, a
       small sweating operation will employ a crude open hearth type reverberatory
       furnace even though it is a less  efficient operation. In  the open hearth type
       reverberatory furnace, the hearth is constructed with a slight incline to the rear
       of the*furnace, which allows the continuous tapping of molten metal as the
       sweated  component  melts and  separates from the  solid charge. The rotary
       furnaces are tapped periodically  from ports which are normally sealed during
       rotation  and firing. The furnaces are generally refractory lined, however, in the
       case of  tin and lead sweating,  cast iron construction  is possible due to the
       relatively low melting points of these metals. Most of the furnaces are used to
       recover  alternatively  a  variety  of  metals,  and  consequently,  refractory
       construction is essential.  This is  especially true in the smaller  metal recovery
       operations; The reverberatory furnaces can be either gas or oil fired. The choice
       of fuel depends on availability and price.

              A typical sweating heat involves charging scrap  to the  furnace hearth
       and  gradually heating the scrap  to a temperature slightly above the melting
       point of the metal to be  separated. As the metal is sweated from the scrap it is
       tapped into ingots. Fresh  charge is continuously added until either the available

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE,  INC.
       scrap is depleted or the heat is terminated according to a planned schedule. As
       the unmelted residual scrap accumulates, it must be periodically raked from the
       hearth for further processing,  sale, or disposal.  In a typical  small  metals
       recovery  plant  the sweating  operation  is  a  batch-type  process,  where
       accumulations  of  scrap  are sweated  periodically, according to  inventory
       demands.

              The  majority of these sweating operations are  completely  devoid of
       pollution  control facilities.  Again, this is especially true of the smaller  plants.
       Sometimes an  afterburner  is included  either as a separate entity  or, more
       commonly, incorporated in the furnace itself.

       A typical  open hearth type reverberatory sweating furnace facility is shown in
       Figure 16. It should be noted that this system has no fan, and depends solely
       on the natural draft produced in the stack for ventilation  of the furnace.

              The  foregoing  discussion is valid for  most  reverberatory sweating
       furnaces. The  pollution problems and their solutions, however, are specific to a
       given sweating process; the exact solution must be determined by the specific
       metal being separated and the nature of the scrap charge.

                               ALUMINUM SWEATING

              The aluminum sweating  process takes place at a temperature  slightly in
       excess of  1220°F (the melting point of aluminum). There is very little fuming
       or oxidation of the aluminum metal itself;  however, the contaminants in a
       typical  scrap  charge produce large amounts  of  both gaseous and particulate
       emissions. The scrap charged to an aluminum sweating furnace may include any
       one or combination of the following: drosses; skims; aircraft engines, seats, and
       wreckage; painted aluminum sheet metal; insulated wire; automotive  parts; etc.

              Smoke  is  evolved   from  the  incomplete combustion  of organic
       compounds  in  these charge materials, and  fumes are  produced  from the
       oxidation  of zinc  and  magnesium contaminants. The sweating of aluminum
       drosses and skims is particularly troublesome  because they contain halide salts
       which hydrolize to  form very corrosive solutions of hydrochloric acid.  Along
       with the gaseous pollutants evolved including oxides  of sulfur and carbon,
       aluminum, chloride gas, and  others, a considerable amount of particulates are
       evolved in the aluminum sweating process.

       Published emission rates  from uncontrolled  aluminum  sweating furnaces
       indicate an average  rate of 33 pounds particulate per ton processed aluminum

-------
                                        AFTERBURNER
    AFTERBURNER
    COMBUSTION
        AIR
               AFTERBURNER
                   FUEL
       FURNACE FUEL
     ( NAT. GAS OR OIL)
MAIN BURNER
    AIR     	*
                                              1500°F
                                REVERBERATORY
                                   FURNACE
                                    650° F-1300 °F
FURNACE CHARGE (AS HIGH AS 40 WT. %
NON-ALUMINUM AND/OR NON- LEAD      FURNACE
CHARGE )                              PRODUCT
                                                                                   1200°F
                                                                            FURNACE
                                                                             STACK
                                         Figure 16



-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC.
       metal.  Assuming a typical  60 weight percent recoverable aluminum in the
       scrap, one pound of particulates will be evolved for each 100 pounds of charge
       material. An  average furnace with a capacity  of 1000 pounds of processed
       aluminum per hour will produce 10 pounds of particulates per hour, a  large
       percentage of which is of sub-micron particle size.

                                  LEAD SWEATING

              The  lead  sweating  process  is inherently  more  troublesome  than
       aluminum sweating from a pollution standpoint. Although  it is carried out at a
       considerably lower temperature (approximately 650°F) and therefore produces
       less metallic  fumes,  the nonmetallic contaminants in  a typical scrap charge
       produce large amounts of pollutants. One of the primary constituents of  most
       lead  scrap charges, the junk automobile storage battery, is responsible for a
       large portion of these  emissions.  In addition to lead  storage batteries, lead
       drosses and skims,  lead sheathed cable and wire, aircraft ballast weights, and
       other materials are charged to the sweating furnace. Large amounts of sulfur
       oxides, as well as other sulfur compounds, are released from the incineration of
       the lead storage batteries.  The sulfuric acid produced by the hydrolysis of
       sulfur  trioxide gas  is particularly  corrosive to both furnace and  pollution
       control  equipment. The asphaltic battery cases, grease, oil, and other organic
       contaminants  are  only  partially  incinerated in the  sweating furnace  and
       produce large amounts of smoke and soot.

              It is common practice to employ  a single furnace for a  variety of
       sweating processes, and the 1000 pound per hour aluminum sweating furnace
       cited earlier could  be employed for lead sweating also. However, due to the
       large difference in heat required to melt lead and aluminum, this same furnace
       could sweat  10,000 pounds of lead  per  hour, at  an equivalent fuel  rate.
       Published  data indicate  that approximately 150 pounds  of  particulates are
       evolved per ton of scrap metal charge. Assuming 60 weight  percent recoverable
       metallics in the charge, the 10,000 pound per hour lead sweating furnace would
       emit 1250 pounds of particulates per hour, or 250 pounds of  particulates per
       ton of processed  lead. This particulate matter  is very fine, generally in the
       submicron range, with some particles as small as 0.001 micron.
              2)
AIR  POLLUTION  CONTROL  EQUIPMENT
              The control of aluminum and lead sweating  furnace  emissions is  a
       difficult  abatement  problem,  and  the  requirements  should  not  be
       underestimated. However, good control is wholly within the capabilities of our
       present technology. It is essential, however, that the individual  nature of each

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE,  INC.
        source be appreciated and the potential pitfalls considered.

               The  maximum  allowable  particulate  emission  levels  are  generally
        specified as  a  function of process weight (as in the Los Angeles County Air
        Pollution Control District) or by the opacity of the effluent gas stream. When
        the allowable emission levels are expressed in terms of collection efficiency, the
        opacity  basis  indicates efficiency  requirements which are independent  of
        process  size; whereas, the process weight efficiency requirements increase with
        process  size. The most stringent opacity requirement is, of course, a "clear"
        stack, which for an aluminum or lead sweating  process is approximately 0.03
        grains per actual cubic  foot. Several collection efficiency requirements have
        been calculated for both aluminum and  lead sweating operations over a range
        of process sizes; these values are included in the specifications (Air Pollution
        Control Equipment Specifications for Lead/Aluminum Reverberatory Sweating
        Furnace). The required collection efficiencies range from 77.3 weight percent
        to 99.7  weight percent.

                In addition  to venting the products of combustion from the sweating
        furnace, an  air pollution control system should  also include hooding facilities
        to provide ventilation during furnace charging and  tapping. Properly designed
        canopy  hoods should suffice for the open hearth type reverberatory furnaces;
        however, more complicated hooding may be necessary for the rotary, or tube
        type reverberatory furnaces.

               Of the common high-efficiency type collection equipment presently
        available, only the  fabric filters and wet scrubbers can provide a satisfactory
        solution to  the pollution problems of  the lead/aluminum sweating furnace.
        Although  the  electrostatic  precipitator  has   the necessary   performance
        potential,  the required  auxiliary equipment and additional electrical power
        supply services render the electrostatic precipitator economically impractical
        for the relatively small gas volumes handled in sweating facilities.

               The  oily  and combustible  nature  of  the  sweating furnace effluent
        presents an  explosion  hazard and many other  operational  problems. An
        afterburner  is  essential to any pollution  control equipment. The afterburner
        must be designed to provide adequate mixing and sufficient retention time for
        complete combustion at firing  temperatures.  This is true whether it is  an
        integral  part of the sweating furnace  or a separate piece of equipment. A
        luminous flame afterburner  operating  at  between  1200°F  and  1500°F is
        generally recommended.

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE,  INC.
                                  FABRIC FILTERS

              The  installation of  a  fabric collector is perhaps the  most common
       approach to the sweating furnace abatement problem.  However, due to the
       temperature limitations on  filter fabrics, the afterburner effluent gases  must
       first  be cooled to an acceptable temperature level, usually around 250 F.
       Evaporative cooling with a water spray, and mixing with ambient air are  used,
       but  the most  successful  method  uses  radiant/convection  U-tube  heat
       exchangers. Both evaporative cooling and cooling by ambient air dilution have
       caused condensation of water  and acid vapors in some cases. Relatively heavy,
       woven Dacron bags, applied at superficial velocities of approximately two feet
       per minute  are  commonly used in  this  application. Orion  has also  been
       employed successfully in some instances.

              If the baghouse temperature is allowed to drop below the water or acid
       vapor dew point, hydrolysis of halide salts may take place. Direct condensation
       of hydrochloric, sulfuric, or  hydrofluoric  acid will  occur, with devastating
       effects on both  the baghouse shell and the fabric bags themselves. For this
       reason strict temperature control  must be  maintained on any fabric  filter
       installation.  Ideally a baghouse  should  be  both fully  insulated and equipped
       with standby heating facilities to insure the minimum of condensation, even
       during periods when  the furnace is not being fired.  As an added precaution
       most  baghouses  are epoxy  coated to prevent corrosion. To  protect  against
       uncontrolled temperature surges or cooler failure  an  emergency dilution, or
       bypass damper may be installed upstream of the baghouse, shown in Figure 17.
                                 WET SCRUBBERS

              High-energy wet scrubber systems  have been successfully applied to
       aluminum/lead sweating facilities and  afford  an excellent solution to the
       pollution control  problem. However, the high  operating costs, the  potential
       water pollution problems,  and the relative complexity of the equipment have
       limited the appeal of scrubbers. Considerably  less space is required for the
       installation of a scrubber system than an equivalent baghouse. This is because
       scrubbers do not require  cooling of the inlet  gas, and because they  are,
       ordinarily, smaller than the equivalent baghouse.  Perhaps the most important
       advantage of a scrubber system is the ability to  remove corrosive gases and
       mists  from  the furnace effluent gases  as well  as extremely fine particulate
       matter.

              An aluminum/lead  sweating facility will require a high-energy Venturi

-------
  CHARGE
   HOOD
FURNACE
CHARGE"
 CO
                          AFTERBURNER
                             1500 °F
                   100'F
REVERBERATORY
   FURNACE
                       FURNACE
                       PRODUCT
                                                 RADIANT /CONVECTION
                                                   COOLING TUBES
                                              1200°F
                                             REFRACTORY
                                             LINED DUCT
                                           100 *F
                                         250-F
                                            TAP HOOD
                                                   BAGHOUSE
                                                {SHAKER TYPE)
                               THERMOCOUPLE
                                CONTROLLED
                                EMERGENCY
                             DILUTION  DAMPER
                                                                      '   DUST
                                                                       CONVEYING
                                                                         SYSTEM
                                              Figure 17


                                     Typical Fabric Collector Installation

                                  for Reverberatory Furnace Sweating Facility
                                                                       EFFLUENT
                                                                         STACK




\/\/\/v
to


y u

                                                                     FAN, MOTOR

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS CLEANING    INSTITUTE, INC.
         scrubber possibly requiring as much as 40 or 50 inches wg differential pressure
         across the transfer  zone, or  an equivalent  scrubber, to provide the necessary
         paniculate collection efficiency. The portion of the scrubber system exposed
         to high temperatures and/or abrasion must  be refractory lined. The remainder
         of the downstream system should be fabricated of corrosion resistant materials.
         With caustic addition using  a pH  controller and  possibly  clarification, the
         effluent slurry  will be acceptable to most municipal sewage  treatment plants,
         without costly  inplant water treatment facilities.  To  avoid damage to the
         scrubber during start up either a by-pass damper or an electrically interlocked
         fan/pump system is recommended, as in Figure 18.

                In rare cases, where the scrap charge evolves unusually large quantities
         of  corrosive or noxious  gases and a  scrubber   alone cannot  reduce the
         particulate pollutants to an acceptable level, a combination  pollution control
         system may  be necessary. The  sweating of PVC coated wire, which evolves
         hydrochloric acid and organic vapors, and Teflon" coated wire, which evolves
         hydrofluoric  acid, are particularly troublesome in  this context. To overcome
         this problem of excessive  gaseous  emissions, a packed absorption tower,  in
         addition to a scrubber or baghouse, may be necessary.
                b.
SPECIFICATIONS AND COSTS
               The sweating furnace effluent can  be treated adequately by either a
         fabric collector or a wet scrubber. The variability of the sweating operation
         makes it difficult to generalize as to the size and performance requirements for
         air pollution control equipment to fit a given furnace.

               Careful measurement of  the  actual  gas flows, particulate contaminant
         loadings and gas contaminants over the normal range of operations carried out
         in the furnace to be treated provides an effective, although  costly, basis for
         design.

               Another alternative is to  minimize the effect  of the variable flow from
         the  sweating  furnace by combining the  effluent with that of the cupola or
         other smelting equipment.

               For purposes of  this study, the  process description and  operating
         conditions are specified for a furnace which may alternately handle aluminum
         sweating  and  lead  sweating, but which  is  treated apart  from  any other
         equipment in the smelting plant.

               The process description used for the  fabric collector case  is given in

-------
CHARGE
 HOOD
 FURNACE
 CHARGE
                       AFTERBURNER
                            1500'F
              100'F
                REVERSE RATORY
                  FURNACE
                      FURNACE
                      PRODUCT
                                                         REFRACTORY LINED
                                                         STAINLESS STEEL
                                                         SCRUBBER
                                                1200 "F
                                            REFRACTORY
                                            DUCT
                                         100°F
                                         TAP
                                        HOOD
                                        RECIRCULATION
                                            PUMP
SLURRY
DRAIN
        / CAUSTIC
       /ADDITION
CORROSION
RESISTANT
DUCT FOR
SATURATED
GAS
                       CORROSION
                       RESISTANT
                       EFFLUENT STACK
. CORROSION
 RESISTANT
 FAN, MOTOR
  & DRIVE
                                              Figure 18


                                     Typical Wet Scrubbing Installation


-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS  CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC
       Table 44, and the operating  conditions in Table 45. The quoted costs are
       summarized in Table 46, and plotted in Figure 19.

              The wet scrubber specifications are detailed in Tables 47 and  48, and
       the prices received in response in Table 49. These are plotted in Figure 20. As
       was  the  case for the  fabric  collector,  the  scrubber manufacturer  did not
       distinguish between the  low and high efficiency cases.

               c.      DISCUSSION  OF   COSTS FOR  LEAD/ALUMINUM
                      SWEATING FURNACES

               The cost of treating a furnace to be used for sweating operations may
        vary over a wide range depending upon  the charge stock and desired products.
        Sweating either lead or aluminum from "clean" scrap with little organic or fine
        particulate material can probably be carried  out without air pollution control
        equipment.

               For the more general  case  in  which  nearly any  lead  or aluminum
        containing material  may be  included  in the charge, both afterburning and
        particulate  collection  are  required.  The  afterburning  function  is  most
        frequently carried out in the furnace proper. Particulate collection by fabric
        filtration is more expensive in terms of first cost, but has a lower operating cost
        and longer life.

               These factors tend to reduce the apparent cost difference, and if the
        operation is run on a  nearly continuous basis the fabric collector may be less
        expensive. This is illustrated  in Table 50, which compares the "Total Annual
        Cost" for the two collector types at several levels of usage. In this example, the
        fabric collector is more costly than the  scrubber for 2000  hours of operation
        per year, but more economical at 4000 or more hours/year.  Figure 21  is a  plot
        of operating cost versus annual hours of operation.

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS CLEANING    INSTITUTE,  INC
                                            Table 44

                           FABRIC COLLECTOR PROCESS DESCRIPTION
                            FOR SWEA TING FURNACE SPECIFICA TION
                The fabric filter is to serve one aluminum reverberatory or tube furnace used for
         sweating lead and aluminum alternatively. The capacity of the furnace is given in terms of
         the rate of product production, which varies between the two operations. For example,
         WOO Ib/hr aluminum and  10,000 Ib/hr lead are alternative designations for the same
         furnace.
                The charge materials will include,  but will not be limited to, the items checked
         below:
                      LEAD

                 Auto batteries (Complete)
                 Lead sheathed cable & wire
                 Tooling dies
                 Dross and skimmings
                 Rubber insulation
                 Plastic insulation
                 Other
     ALUMINUM

Magnesium stampings
Scrap aluminum sheet
Pots and pans
Aircraft engines
Airframe scrap
Insulated wire
Other
                The furnace will be used to melt lead and aluminum (the above materials) selectively,
         and  to burn the extraneous materials.  The molten metal products are tapped into ingot
         molds through a spout requiring ventilation in addition to the furnace flue gas.

                The furnace is hand charged through doors at the front of the furnace. The burners
         are fired at 2,200,000 BTU/hr with natural gas. There is an afterburner with a maximum
         heat input of 2200,000 BTU/hr which produces a maximum exit temperature of 1500°F at
          100% excess air. During the burnout phase of the operation, as much as 40% of the charge
         by weight may comprise insulation with a fuel value of 10,000 to 18,000 BTU/lb.

                Operating conditions will vary widely during  the day as the charge materials and
         products vary.

         POL LUTION A BA TEMENT EQUIPMENT

                The baghouse will be installed downstream of the afterburner. A radiant convection
         tube cooler will bring the gas temperature down from 1500°F to 250°F.  A further safety
         provision shall be made by the installation of a  thermocouple controlled  air dilution inlet
         damper. Water cooling of gas by evaporation is not acceptable.

                The bag filter shall be an automatic, continuous orlon cloth filter at an aircloth ratio
         of not over 2:1.  The bag filter shell and hopper shall be constructed of mild steel.

                Installation of baghouse will be adjacent to furnace  building and be located outside
         subject to ambient conditions.

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING   INSTITUTE,  INC.
                                       Table 44
                                      (continued)
             Auxiliary equipment for bag filter shall include:

              (1)  Fan, motor, drive and damper
              (2)  Screw conveyor under bag filter
              (3)  Thermocouple controlled air dilution inlet damper
              (4)  Gas cooling system

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE,  INC.
                                         Table 45


                   OPERATING  CONDITIONS  FOR  SWEATING FURNACE

                           FABRIC  COLLECTOR SPECIFICATION
                        (Data for aluminum sweating/data for lead sweating)
                                                     Small
                                                   (1 Furnace)
              Medium
            (2 Furnaces)
              Large
            (3 Furnaces)
       Furnace Capacity, ton
       Melting rate, Ib/hr
       Process Wt., Ib/hr
       Inlet gas volume, ACFM"
       Inlet gas Temp., °F*
       Inlet Loading, Ib/hr*
       Inlet loading, gr/ACF*
1000/10,000 2000/20,000 3000/30,000
1600/16,000 3200/32,000 4800/48,000
15,400      30,800      46,200
   250         250         250
17/1230     88/2460     50/3670
0.129/9.32   0.129/9.32   0.129/9.32
       Outlet loading, Ib/hr
       Outlet loading, gr/ACF
       Eff., Wt. %
                                 Case 1 — LA Process Weight
3.66/13.74
0.028/0.104
78.5/98.9
5.27/23.44
0.020/0.089
84.0/99.0
6.52/33.1
0.0165/0.084
87.0/99.1
                                  Case 2 — High Efficiency
       Outlet loading, Ib/hr
       Outlet loading, gr/ACF
       Eff., Wt. %
3.86
0.03
77.3/99.7
7.72
0.03
77.3/99.7
11.6
0.03
77.3/99.7
        *A fter air dilution

-------
INDUSTRIAL  GAS CLEANING  INSTITUTE, INC
                              Table 46
                        Fabric Collector Cost Data
                         for Sweating Furnaces
INFORMATION
Process Capacity, Ton/Day :
Inlet Gas Volume, ACFM
Efficiency, Wt. %
Controlled Emission, gr/ACF
Type of Charge
o
Inlet Gas Temperature, F
System Horsepower
Equipment Cost, $
A. Collector
B. Auxiliaries
C. Gas Conditioning Equipment
D. Waste Equipment
E. Other :
Total :
Installation Cost, $
A. Grass-Roots
B. Add-On *
Expected Life, Years
Operating and Maintenance $/year ]
FABRIC COLLECTOR
SMALL
19.2
15,400
99.5
<.01
Lead/
250
50
15,677
6,557
60,125
$83,359 !
$61,770 !
25
$4,536
MEDIUM
38.4
30,800
99.5
<.01
'Al/Mg/droi
250
100
27,841
11,320
117,250
156,411
117,310
25
$7,776
LARGE
57.6
46,200
99.5
< .01
s
250
150
41,762
- 17,158
174,375
$233,295
$174,975
25
$11,664
*  No substantial difference  from grass roots

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC.
   rt
   o
   Q
   o

   in
o

H

i
   t/)
   O
                             Figure 19
                       Cost of Fabric Collectors
                        for Sweating Furnaces
     600


     500


     400



     300





     200
        100
         70
      50
         30
         20
         10


~ — ' Turnkey Installai

— for Grass Roots .

	 .f i 	 ...
	 — 1~ 	 	 - ; - - 1 	 * 	 	
' 4
f


t * ,
-i = = = = = = = = EE = EE-E:E:::ji!!;; Fal
•=ppi|;:::|;:;;;;i!;; ::'"; Au3
===========!!=!=ric Collector § ;
ciliary Equipment :


::::::::::::;il!' : :::::::::::::: 	
	 ,i 	 -t 	

fiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiHiiiiiiiiiiiiiiyiitb
Fabric Collector -•
Only :
- 	 	



            10
                     20         40     60


                   Process Capacity, Ton/Day
100

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE, INC.
                                           Table  47

                            WET SCRUBBER PROCESS DESCRIPTION
                           FOR SWEA TING FURNACE SPECIF 1C A TION

              The scrubber is to serve one aluminum  reverberatory or tube furnace used for
       sweating lead and aluminum alternatively. The capacity of the furnace is given in terms of
       the rate of product production, which varies between the two .operations.  For example,
       1000 Ib/hr aluminum and 10,000 Ib/hr lead are alternative designations  for the same
       furnace.
              The charge materials will include, but will not be limited to, the items checked
       below:
          /
          /
          /
          /
          /
     LEAD

Auto Batteries (Complete)
Lead sheathed cable & wire
Tooling dies
Dross and skimmings
Rubber insulation
Plastic insulation
Other  	
     ALUMINUM

Magnesium stampings       v
Scrap aluminum sheet       /
Pots and pans              *
Aircraft engines            v
Airframe scrap             *
Insulated wire              /
Other	
              The furnace will be used to melt lead and aluminum, the above materials, selectively
       and  to burn  the extraneous materials.  The molten metal products are tapped into ingot
       molds through a spout requiring ventilation in addition to the furnace flue gas.
                                                                     ;
                                                                    /
              The furnace is hand charged through doors at the front of the furnace. The burners
       are fired at 2,200,000 BTU/hr with natural gas.  There is an afterburner with a maximum
       heat input of 2,200,000 BTU/hr which produces a maximum exit temperature of 1500 F at
       100% excess air. During the burnout phase of the operation, as much as 40% of the charge
       by weight may comprise insulation with a fuel value of 10,000 to 18,000 BTU/lb.

              Operating conditions will vary widely during the day as  the charge materials and
       products vary.

              The scrubber system will be installed downstream of an afterburner. The scrubber
       shall be installed following a run of refractory-lined duct to suit the location of the scrubber.
       The scrubber material shall be type 316 ELC stainless steel, refractory-lined in areas subject
       to high temperature and/or abrasion. The draft loss across the scrubber shall be not less than
       40" wg or the equivalent in energy input.

              Installation of scrubber shall be adjacent to furnace- building and located  outside
       subject to ambient conditions.

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING   INSTITUTE,  INC.
                                      Table 47
                                     (continued)
            Auxiliary equipment for scrubbers shall include:

             (1)  Fan, motor, drive and damper
             (2)  Slurry handling system (not including interconnecting pipe)
             (3)  Pumps
             (4)  Water conditioning system

-------
INDUSTRIAL     GAS CLEANING    INSTITUTE, INC
                                         Table  48


                    OPERATING CONDITIONS FOR SWEATING  FURNACE

                               WET SCRUBBER  SPECIFICATION



                        (Data for aluminum sweating/data for lead sweating)
                                                     Small       Medium      Large
                                                    (1 Furnace)  (2 Furnaces)   (3 Furnaces)
        Melting Rate, Ib/hr
        Process Wt., Ib/hr
        Inlet gas vol., ACFM
        Inlet gas temp., °F
        Inlet loading, Ib/hr
        Inlet loading, gr/ACF
        Outlet Gas Volume, ACFM
        Outlet Temp., °F
1000/10,000
1600/16,000
42,500
 1,500
17/1230
0.046/3.38
15,000
   180
2000/20,000
3200/32,000
85,000
 1,500
33/2460
0.046/3.38
30,000
   180
3000/30,000
4800/48,000
127,500
   1,500
50,3690
0.046/3.38
45,000
   180
                                  Case 1 - LA Process Weight
        Outlet loading, Ib/hr
        Outlet loading, gr/ACF
        Eff., Wt. %
3.66/13.74
0.028/0.108
78.5/98.9
5.27/23.44
0.020/0.091
84.0/99.0
6.52/33.1
0.017/0.086
87.0/99.1
                                   Case 2 — High Efficiency
        Outlet loading, Ib/hr
        Outlet loading, gr/ACF
        Eff., Wt. %
3.86
0.03
77.3/99:7
7.72
0.03
77.3/99.7
11.6
0.03
77.3/99.7

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS  CLEANING  INSTITUTE, INC.
                             Table 49
                       Wet Scrubber Cost Data
                        for Sweating Furnaces
INFORMATION
Process Capacity, Ton/Day
Inlet Gas Volume, ACFM
Efficiency, Wt . \
Controlled Emission, gr/ACF
Type of Charge
Inlet Gas Temperature, °F
System Horsepower
Equipment Cost, $
A. Collector
B. Auxiliaries
C. Gas Conditioning Equipment
D. Waste Equipment
E. Other
Total
Installation Cost, $
A. Grass-Roots
B. Add-On*
Expected Life, Years
Operating and Maintenance $/year
WET SCRUBBER
SMALL
19.2
42,500

< .03
Per

1,500
250
18,850
27,950
11,050
6,800
64,650
25,000
10
2,800
MEDIUM
38.4
85,000

<.03
Specif ical
1,500
450
24,210
76,440
15,265
11,200
127,115
45,000
10
3,300 ,
LARGE
57.6
127,500

<.03
ion

1,500
675
33,140
80,760
19,177
17,200
150,277
65,000
10
3,800

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS  CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC.
    V)
    (H

    OJ
    O
    Q
                             Figure 20


                         Cost of Wet Scrubbers


                         for Sweating Furnaces

                         (Hq* Efficiency)
          300
          200
          100
trt
13
ti
ri
V)
3
O
H
i
tf)
O
u



70


50




           30
           20
           10





















Turnkey Installati<
for Grass Roots PI,
	 — 	 ., , 	 j ]
- 	 - 	 •/••••• ;.
-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING   INSTITUTE,  INC
                                  Table 50
                         Comparison of Total Costs for
                       Wet Scrubbers and Fabric Collectors
                             For Sweating Furnaces
      Basis:  38.4 Ton/Day Furnace (Lead)
            10% Yearly Cost of Capital
            0.01 $/kw-hr Cost of Power
            25 Year Life for Fabric;  10 Year for Scrubber
Operating Hours/Year
Fabric Collector
First Cost
Annual Capital
Parts & Labor
Horsepower
Total
Wet Scrubber
First Cost
Annual Capital
Parts & Labor
Horsepower
Total
500

32,719
7,776
440
40,935

30,700
3,230
1,975
35,905
1,000

C
32,719
7,776
880
41,375

30,700
3,230
3,950
37,880
2,000

73,420)
32,719
7,776
1,760
42,215

59,115)
30,700
3,230
7,900
41,830
4,000

32,719
7,776
3,520
44,015

30,700
3,230
13,825
47,755
6,000

32,719
7,776
5,280
45,775
\
30,700
3,230
19,750
53,680

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC.
                               Figure 21



                    Comparison of Abatement Equipment Costs


                            For Sweating Furnaces
                                                   Fabric
                                                 ,  Collector
  30
 134
             1,000
2,000                4,000
        Incurs/Year

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE,  INC.
       5.     AIR  POLLUTION  CONTROL   FOR  LEAD  REVERBERATORY
              FURNACES

              a.     PROCESS DESCRIPTION

              1)     MANUFACTURING ASPECTS

              Reverberatory furnaces are used in a number of ways in the processing
       of lead scrap metal for reclaim. The furnace is merely a  device for heating the
       contents by  direct  contact  with the  products  of  combustion  of oil or gas
       burners,  and by radiation from the hot walls to the contents of the furnace.
       Whether  there is any significant potential air contamination produced depends
       to a large extent upon the use to which the furnace is put. Several of the uses
       of reverberatory furnaces in a secondary lead processing plant are:

              a)   burnout
              b)   sweating
              c)   melting
              d)   purification.

                                     BURNOUT

              The burnout operation is not strictly a smelting  process, but rather
       involves the incineration of materials which may be present in scrap metal such
       as plastics,  rubber insulation,  wood, paper  and  other combustible materials.
       When a reverberatory furnace is used for burnout operations, the air pollution
       control equipment requirements are similar to those for any other incineration
       device. That  is,  the  furnace must  be provided  with  sufficient time  at
       temperature to burn any combustible vapors released during the incineration
       process.  If not, a smoke will be produced. The smoke may exceed  the visible
       opacity regulations in force in the area, or may produce grain loadings in excess
       of the allowable emission limit. If this is the case, it will  be necessary to install
       a thermal afterburner to oxidize the combustible  material. This subject falls
       more strictly  in the  category of treatment  of  incineration equipment than
       smelting   equipment, however. Burnout operations may also  involve  the
       decomposition of halogen-containing plastic  materials. Polyvinyl chloride wire
       insulation and Teflon are examples of  combustible materials which  release
       halogen  acids  when  they are burned.  These  materials  are toxic and  are
       objectionable  on the  basis  of odor when  emitted into  the atmosphere in
       significant quantities. Burnout operations which involve substantial quantities
       of halogen-containing plastics should be equipped with an afterburner-scrubber
       combination in which the scrubber is used to  absorb the halogen acids into a
       water stream.

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC.
                                     SWEATING

              Lead sweating operations, in which lead is separated from a mixture of
       materials, many of which have higher melting points than  lead,  is covered in
       detail in another section of this report. The air pollution problems related to
       lead sweating are mainly associated with the incidental burnout of combustible
       materials during sweating, with the entrainment of dusty materials in the flue
       gas, and with SOX produced from batteries.


                                      MELTING

              Reverberatory furnaces may  be used to melt lead  pigs or ingots for
       casting. This process is more commonly carried out in indirect heated furnaces
       such as electrical or gas fired crucibles. The melting of lead does  not, in itself,
       involve any significant air pollution problem. The melting point of lead  alloys
       is relatively low, and the vapor pressure of metallic lead over the melt is not
       high enough to make any substantial contribution of vaporized lead to the flue
       gas leaving the furnace.  However, in  any  melting  operation   there is the
       possibility  of   inclusion  of  materials which  will  produce   organic  or
       halogen-containing emissions when  the furnace temperature is raised to the
       melting point of lead. The inclusion of any material other than metallic lead in
       the melting furnace should be considered carefully from the standpoint of the
       potential air pollutants.

                                   PURIFICATION

              The principal use to which reverberatory furnaces are put in secondary
       lead processing  involves the  melting  and purification of lead by removal of
       extraneous ingredients. This is the principal process which can be described as
       "smelting" in the reverberatory furnace. It is to this process the  remainder of
       this discussion will be directed.

                         RAW MATERIALS AND  PRODUCTS

              The reverberatory furnace may be used for the purification of molten
       lead by oxidation of impurities such  as iron, arsenic, antimony,  and tin. The
       furnace may also be used for reduction of lead oxide drosses, etc. In the case of
       primary smelting, only the oxidation process is carried out in the reverberatory
       furnace with the  reduction  generally done  in a lead  blast furnace.  Many
       secondary  smelters do not operate a  blast furnace, and may carry out  both
       operations  in  the same reverberatory  furnace. The charge stock  for  such
       smelting operations may be molten lead from a blast furnace in which lead
       oxide has been  reduced by reaction  with carbon or coke,  or it may be lead
       ingots cast during a sweating operation conducted in a separate reverberatory

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC
        sweating furnace. It is not uncommon that  burnout, sweating, and smelting
        operations are carried out sequentially in the same reverberatory furnace. Some
        raw scrap  material may be of sufficient high purity to  charge directly to the
        reverberatory furnace for purification.

               Throughout the remainder of this discussion, it  will  be presumed that
        the principal purpose  of  the  reverberatory furnace smelting operation  is the
        removal of oxidizable  impurities as drosses.  The many alternative problems
        with respect to air pollution, which arise when materials such as plastics, oils,
        etc. are charged incidentally, must be treated separately.

               The reverberatory furnace  may be charged with molten lead from
        the cupola on a continuous basis. In this case, air blowing to oxidize metal
        impurities  is done either intermittently or continuously. The  metal dross is
        removed by slagging intermittently. The molten metal product is removed from
        the furnace by tapping it into molds on an intermittent basis.

               Solid lead scrap may  be charged continuously to  the reverberatory
        furnace. Items of scrap lead such as battery plates, lead  pipe, cable sheathing,
        etc. can be hand fed through charging doors, or fed continuously on conveyors.
        Here again,  the  air   blowing and  dressing  can be either intermittent  or
        continuous. Casting of the product is ordinarily intermittent.

               In  the case where solid lead scrap is charged directly to the furnace, it is
        customary to start the charge  by piling a small amount of solid charge material
        on the  hearth and gradually raising the furnace temperature  until  the material
        becomes partially melted. As a molten bath is formed on the  hearth, additional
        scrap is added and product is  removed when  the melt level is sufficiently high.

               Lead product  is ordinarily classified as hard, semi-soft or soft according
        to  the amount of impurities it contains. Soft lead ordinarily requires fluxing in
        a crucible  furnace and cannot be produced economically in  the reverberatory
        furnace. Semi-soft lead containing between 0.3 and 0.4% antimony and up to
        0.05% copper is commonly produced by the reverberatory furnace.

               Although the melting point of pure  lead is on the order of 625°F,
        temperatures exceeding 2000°F  are used for the purification of lead in the
        reverberatory furnace. These  higher temperatures are required principally  to
        bring about the  reaction between  the metallic impurities  and  the  oxygen
        sparged  into  the metal  bath.  If lead oxide drosses are charged  to  the
        reverberatory furnace, it is necessary to add a reducing agent such as granular
        carbon  to the bath to reduce the lead oxide to metallic lead.

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC.
                               FURNACE  EQUIPMENT

              The  lead  reverberatory  furnace  is constructed  of  fire  brick  and
        refractory  materials. The materials of construction need  not  be particularly
        resistant to temperature, but  the chemical reactivity  of the metal drosses is
        high, and  the  refractory  linings  must withstand the continual  contact with
        drosses and slag.

              Ordinarily,  the  furnace   is kept  as  tight  as possible  to  limit the
        infiltration of  air through charging doors, slagging  openings  and inspection
        ports. This minimizes the amount of fuel required to heat the leakage. Ideally,
        only the flue gases produced by the burner system and air blown through the
        melt to remove impurities would be  vented from the furnace  through a dust
        collection system. In cases where  substantial quantities of organic material are
        present in the charge, it is necessary to allow for infiltration of air to burn the
        organic vapors generated in the furnace and prevent smoking.

              Leakage of air into the furnace is generally avoided by  operating with
        the  pressure  inside the furnace nearly equal  to atmospheric  pressure. This
        balanced draft  situation results in a minimum of infiltration, but may cause the
        furnace to "spill" combustion products out through open doors or inspection
        ports.  In order to prevent serious discharge of contaminants into the foundry,
        hoods are usually  provided over these openings.  As the hoods capture the
        fumes which leave the furnace when the doors  are opened, the ventilating air
        from the hoods must be treated in the  air pollution control device  also. There is
        generally  no  requirement for hooding the metal pouring spout  through which
        the molten product is tapped into molds.

              A flow diagram of the reverberatory furnace with a typical gas cooling
        system  is shown  in Figure 22. This  furnace is designed in such a way  that
        combustible vapors generated in the furnace are incinerated before leaving the
        furnace.  For  this reason, no separate incineration device is shown. In the  case
        of the fabric  filter installation sketched in Figure 22, the combustion products
        are cooled to a limited extent by mixing with ambient air drawn through the
        ventilating hoods. Further cooling is necessary to protect the fabric filter from
        damage due  to high  gas temperature. This cooling is  provided partly by a
        section of duct work arranged in a serpentine configuration which exposes a
        great deal of  outside surface area to  the atmosphere. This serves  to drop the gas
        temperature to the level of about 1000-500°F. In some cases, sufficient cooling
        surface is provided to bring the gas temperature all the way down to the range
        acceptable for  Dacron bags (around 270°F). In larger installations,  it is less
        expensive to provide some dilution air  to do the final cooling.

-------
                 REVERBERATORY
                    FURNACE
          GAS OR
           OIL FU€L
  COMBUSTION
     AIR
  LEAD
 SCRAP
CHARGE

        FLUX
             AIR
           LANCE
                          LEAD
                        PRODUCT
                    SETTLER -
                    COOLERS
                  Y     T
                           T
                                                      LEAD OXIDE TO
                                                      BLAST FURNACE
                                                                                             STACK
                                                                                           DISCHARGE
  FABRIC
COLLECTOR
FAN
      t



^



Y

Y
   t   t
 FINES  TO
  BLAST
   FURNACE
 co
 co
               Figure 22



-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE, INC.
              In the arrangement shown in Figure 22, sufficient dilution air is added
       to  bring the gas temperature to 270°F, and also to provide an  emergency
       quench arrangement to drop the temperature even lower in the event that the
       furnace temperature control does not limit the temperature properly.

              In many installations,  the U-tube cooler arrangement is replaced by a
       large diameter cyclone which functions in exactly the same way with regard to
       cooling the flue gas, but also serves as a  "knock-out" chamber in which  large
       particulate materials settle. The large cyclone has the advantage that any heavy
       materials  carried over from the  reverberatory furnace can  settle  out before
       reaching  the fabric filter, and any  burning carbon or metal  particles can  be
       dropped  from the gas stream  before  reaching the filter. This is important in
       protecting the combustible filter fabric from ignition.

              An alternative arrangement of air  pollution control equipment is shown
       in Figure  23. Here, the gas leaving the reverberatory furnace and the ventilating
       hoods is  carried  to  a  quench  chamber where  water  is  used to drop the
       temperature to a reasonable level so that carbon  steel duct work can be used
       between the quench chamber and the scrubber. Quench chambers are generally
       unsatisfactory as pretreating devices for fabric filters because of the possibility
       that the water supply will cool the gas stream  excessively and saturate it with
       water. Saturated gas will  very likely  wet the filter cake collected on a fabric
       filter  and  cause  a "blinding"  condition  which  will  prevent  the  proper
       ventilation of the furnace. With wet scrubbers there  is no equivalent situation.
       A tank for caustic addition is provided for SO2 scrubbing in Figure 23.

              When either a fabric filter or a scrubber is provided for collection of the
       particulate emission from a reverberatory furnace, it is  necessary to furnish a
       fan with sufficient horsepower to pump the gas through the air pollution device
       at a high  enough volume to ventilate the furnace properly. For a fabric filter
       the  necessary pressure is  only a few  inches of water column. Wet scrubbers,
       however, require fans with relatively high pressure drops on the order of 50-60
       inches water column in  order to collect the very  fine particulate  material
       generated by oxidizing  impurities  in the molten lead. When fans are installed
       that have the capability of moving large quantities of air, it is usually necessary
       to provide some sort of draft control at the furnace to prevent over-ventilating,
       as well as to insure that adequate ventilation will  be obtained. In the simplest
       case, this consists of a barometric damper  located after the cooling surface for a
       fabric  filter installation, and between the  reverberatory furnace and the quench
       chamber for a wet  scrubbing system.

-------
                                                                           FLUE GAS
                                  WATER
                                  QUENCH
   COMBUSTION AIR
— FUEL GAS OR OIL
         AIR

                       DROSS
                   LEAD
                 PRODUCT
                                    WATER
 VENTURI
CONTACTOR
          GAS
      ABSORPTION
         TOWER
                                                           MIST ELIMINATOR
                                                     SURGE
                                                     TANK
                                 CAUSTIC
                                  TANK
                                          Figure 23


                           Process Flow Sketch for Lead Reverberatory Furnace


-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE,  INC.
              2)
CONTROL EQUIPMENT
              The principal problem  associated with the operation of reverberatory
       furnaces for lead smelting is the emission of inorganic particulate matter. This
       consists of the oxides of metal impurities such as iron, antimony, etc. and lead
       oxide itself. The former are oxidized in the molten bath and rise to the surface
       as drosses. They are mechanically entrained in the flue gas stream either by the
       action of  the sparge gas or by contact with the flue gas itself.  The  lead is
       ordinarily  vaporized from the surface of the melt into the flue gas, and reacts
       there with the residual oxygen to produce lead oxide. In addition  to these
       metallic oxides,  there may be oxides  of sulfur  introduced as lead sulfate or
       sulfuric acid  with used  lead  storage  batteries, organic  materials from the
       vaporization and partial combustion of plastics, oils, etc., and halogen acids
       produced by the decomposition of PVC plastics and Teflon.

              In  order to provide a system that will be satisfactory in all respects, it is
       necessary to establish the total gas flow rate, the composition of the gas stream,
       and the nature and level of the contaminants. Each of these will be considered
       in some detail in the following paragraphs.

              The  most  important  single  variable in  sizing air pollution  control
       equipment is the  flowing  volume   of  the gas  stream which  must  be
       accommodated.  Because of the many factors which contribute to the volume
       of gas required  for  adequate  ventilation and cooling of the effluent from
       reverberatory furnaces, it  is imperative that a measurement  of the gas flow
       using accepted flow measuring technique (such as contained in the Industrial
       Gas Cleaning Institute  publication WS-1) be used to measure the gas volume.
       For preliminary  estimate of  the gas flow - such as might be used for sizing
       equipment for budgetary estimates — the volume of the flue gas and ventilating
       air for hoods may be approximated. Four or five ACFM at 270°F per pound of
       metal melted per hour is a good first approximation.  However, it should be
       borne in mind that poorly sealed furnaces, or furnaces with unusually large
       hooded areas may use several times as much air to provide adequate ventilation.
       A first estimate of the grain  loading  can  be made by  using the "emission
       factor" quoted by the National Air Pollution Control Administration for lead
       reverberatory furnaces.  This is given as  154 pounds of metal per ton of charge.
       The rates of emission of organic materials and other contaminants such as SOo,
       HCI  and  HF  can only be estimated from  the  rates at which  the precursor
       materials can  be charged to the furnace. It is  not recommended that equipment
       specifications be based on such estimates, but rather on a source test performed
       by accepted methods.

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS CLEANING    INSTITUTE, INC
                  AIR POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT TYPES

              Strictly  speaking,  the  air  pollution  control   equipment  for  a
       reverberatory furnace should consist of an afterburner if any organic material is
       put into the furnace, and a particulate collection device if the furnace is used
       for refining of  lead  by oxidizing other metallic  impurities. However, the
       afterburning  is  most frequently accomplished  in  the reverberatory furnace
       proper. This is accomplished by preventing  excessive leakage of air into the
       furnace, and introducing controlled amounts of oxygen either as excess air to
       the gas or oil burners, or in a separate series of vent ports.

              Particulate  collection equipment   is   generally  divided  into  four
       classifications:

                          1.      Mechanical dust collectors
                          2.      Electrostatic precipitators
                          3.      Fabric filters
                          4.      Wet scrubbers

              The mechanical dust collectors do  not have good efficiency on the
       submicron particulate matter emitted in lead  smelting, and they cannot be used
       alone  to solve the  particular  air  pollution  problem.  However,  they are
       sometimes used in  series with one of the other collection devices where the
       cyclone  does  a crude separation  of  the  largest particulate matter, and the
       cyclone walls serve  to cool the gas stream by transferring some of the heat to
       ambient air.

                          ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATORS

              Electrostatic precipitators can be used for the collection of lead fume
       from reverberatory  furnaces, but two circumstances make the precipitator an
       unlikely  choice. The first  of  these involves  the high  minimum  cost of
       electrostatic precipitators. The minimum cost of a small precipitator is likely to
       be considerably higher than the cost of either a fabric filter or wet scrubber for
       a  lead reverberatory furnace of nominal size.  In some large installations, the gas
       flow  rate may be high enough to make a precipitator installation economical.
       However, the optimum  performance of electrostatic precipitators requires that
       the electrical resistivity of the dust be within  a narrow range of values. The lead
       oxide dust does not fall within this range without the addition of a chemical
       conditioning  agent to  the   gas  stream.  For  these reasons,  electrostatic
       precipitators are not likely to find wide use on reverberatory furnaces.

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE, INC.
                                   FABRIC  FILTERS

               Fabric  filtration has been the principal  mechanism for participate
       control  from  reverberatory  furnaces. This  is  due  to a  combination  of
       circumstances.  The fabric filter is inherently a very high efficiency device. Even
       when filtering  submicron particulate materials where the dust particle size is
       much smaller than the opening in the fabric weave, the fabric collects particles
       by electrostatic attraction to build a filter cake of very small pore size and then
       collects the submicron material nearly perfectly. In addition, the fabric filter is
       a  dry collection device, and the lead  oxide collected  is in  suitable form for
       return to a blast furnace or reverberatory furnace for reduction  to elemental
       lead.

               The important variables in selection of fabric filters are (1) gas to cloth
       ratio, (2) fabric material and (3) bag  arrangement.  In general, the cost of a
       fabric  filter  increases nearly in  proportion to the amount of bag surface it
       contains. For this reason, the smallest possible surface area is the lowest in first
       costs. This indicates that the highest ratio of gas to  cloth should be the most
       economical  in  first costs. While  this is true, the  performance of fabric filters
       with respect to fabric life,  freedom from plugging problems, etc., is best when
       the velocity of  gas passing through the filter medium is very low. In general, the
       installation will be more economical in the long  run if a relatively low gas to
       cloth ratio is used. Installations  with  one square foot of cloth for every two
       ACFM  of gas (2/1 gas/cloth ratio) have proven satisfactory. For best long term
       performance, a filter  ratio of 1  CFM per square foot of fabric is recommended.

               Several  fabrics can perform satisfactorily  in the atmosphere generated
       by a reverberatory furnace if the temperature is low enough. In  most existing
       installations, Dacron  bags  have been found to provide the best compromise
       between cost, temperature resistance, and  good life characteristics. The Dacron
       bags may be operated at temperatures up  to 300°F. However, deterioration is
       very rapid if the bag temperature limit  is exceeded. For this reason, it is wise to
       design the gas conditioning system to reduce the temperature to a considerably
       lower level during normal  operating conditions. Temperatures of 200-250°F
       are recommended, and design temperatures up to 270°F should be acceptable.
       In addition to the normal cooling by dilution with cold air, dilution with cold
       air plus direct  heat exchange, or through heat exchange alone, an emergency
       quench system should be provided to bleed cold air into the system in large
       quantities if the temperature control mechanism fails.

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE, INC.
                                 WET SCRUBBERS

             Wet scrubbers are capable of providing the high efficiency required on
      the submicron fraction of the reverberatory furnace fume but in order to
      achieve very high collection efficiency, high levels of energy input are required.
      In most cases this is done by taking a high pressure drop across a Venturi throat
      or orifice through which the water used for scrubbing is passed concurrently
      with  the  gas. Pressure differences on  the order  of  30-100 inches of  water
      column are  required in order to  provide  good clean-up for the smelting
      operation. In addition to the large energy input (which may require two 50-500
      horsepower motors), the use of water for scrubbing introduces some corrosion
      problems. SC^ in the gas stream is absorbed in water to form dilute sulfurous
      acid ^2803), which makes any water  that is  recycled to  the scrubber very
      acidic. Without chemical treatment, the pH of the recirculated scrubbing water
      is likely to reach a level  of about  2.0. This will attack most ordinary steel
      construction,  so  it  is necessary to add lime,  caustic soda or some similar
      chemical conditioner to the water to minimize corrosion and prevent discharge
      of very acidic water to the sewer system or to a natural body of water.

             The caustic chemicals might cost several hundred dollars per day.  For
      example,  if the SC^ content of the gases from a large furnace is 5000 ppm and
      the flow  rate averages 14,200  SCFM  (20,000 ACFM  @ 270°F), the SO2
      discharge  rate is 71  SCFM.  Neutralization  of  this much SC^ with caustic
      requires about 15 pounds of caustic addition per minute. At a cost of  4c/lb,
      this amounts  to $288 per eight hour day.

             With   neutralization, the  corrosive action of  the  sulfurous acid is
      reduced but  it is ordinarily  not desirable  to use carbon  steel  because of the
      possibility that the chemical addition will  be  interrupted  for short periods
      during which serious corrosion would take place.

             The dust collected by the wet scrubber will usually be in the form of a
      relatively  dilute slurry. Concentrations over 10 wt %  solid  are not ordinarily
      produced  by  scrubbers.  If the lead oxide recovered by a wet scrubber is to be
      recycled,  some form of settling must be provided to separate the solid from the
      water. This is usually done in a settling  pond, but mechanical settlers  and
      drum-type filters can be used.

             Although  scrubbers have disadvantages as compared  with fabric  filters
      for this application, there is one circumstance in which the scrubber may be the
      only  piece of equipment capable of providing adequate treatment of the gas
      stream. If the  sulfur  content  of the charge is relatively  high, the SC

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE, INC.
        concentration in the vent gas from the reverberatory furnace may exceed local
        emission standards,  or it may produce a nuisance.  In  this  case, a scrubber
        designed solely for absorption of SC>2 in an alkaline scrubbing medium can be
        used  to abate the sulfur oxide emission. Here, it is  likely that the scrubber
        would  be  placed  after an existing  fabric filter  which serves to remove the
        particulate matter. Caustic soda, soda ash, and  other soluble alkaline materials
        can be used to remove the sulfur oxides from the effluent gas stream  in the
        form of soluble sulfites. With proper neutralization these may be suitable for
        discharge into the sewage system serving the plant.


               It  is likely that the local regulations, or good water  treating practice,
        will require some oxidation  of the  sulfites to sulfates by aeration  before the
        spent scrubbing liquor is discharged  into a water  course or sewer. Systems for
        the removal of sulfur oxides are uncommon,  and good practice has not yet
        been established in the secondary smelting industry.

                                 SPECIFIC PROBLEMS

               Several problems are  associated with  lead  smelting  in  reverberatory
        furnaces that are  not common to the secondary  smelting industry  in general.
        These are:

                          (1)    emission of lead fumes
                          (2)    sulfur oxide emissions

               Metallic fumes generally produce dense, opaque visible plumes  which
        are objectionable because they are unsightly and because they contribute  to the
        level  of particulate  matter suspended  in urban atmosphere. Lead  fumes are
        particularly objectionable because of the toxicity of lead. For this reason, the
        particulate  emission standards in most  localities are enforced with  more than
        average diligence when lead oxide is suspected  as a principal  ingredient  in the
        emission. While lead oxide emissions are not subject to special regulation apart
        from process weight  limitations for particulate matter in general,  or opacity
        regulations, it is likely that lead will be singled out for special regulation as air
        pollution standards become more severe. For  this reason, it is  reasonable to
        install particulate abatement equipment capable of meeting the highest possible
        standards of performance. Fabric filters generally are conceded to produce
        collection efficiency greater than  99.5% for submicron fumes of this sort. It is
        reasonable to install  a fabric filter, even  if present regulations would  permit the
        use of a wet scrubber at a lower efficiency level.

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE, INC.
              A second problem peculiar to lead reclaiming is the emission of sulfur
       oxides. The sulfur compounds are quite common in primary smelting because
       many metals occur naturally as sulfides. For example, copper and zinc are most
       commonly  mined as the corresponding sulfide, and  oxidized  in a  roasting
       furnace which produces large quantities of sulfur dioxide.  However, metal
       reclamation processes do not ordinarily involve the sulfide ore. Lead smelting is
       an exception, in that much of the lead usage in  the U.S. is for the production
       of lead storage batteries. These batteries  contain substantial quantities of lead
       sulfate when they are discarded. In addition to the lead sulfate, there may still
       be some sulfuric acid present in  the battery when the plates are put in to the
       reverberatory furnace. If the batteries are in mixed scrap which is sweated to
       produce  lead, the  sulfate may be released in the sweating process. If the plates
       are charged  directly  to  the  reverberatory furnace, the sulfur  oxides will  be
       released there.

              The  concentration  of  sulfur oxides  may  be well within  local  air
       pollution abatement  standards  if the concentration  of  battery scrap in the
       charge is low. However, concentrations of 2000-5000 ppm may be attained if
       the charge consists principally of battery plates. In this circumstance, a wet
       scrubber may be required for the removal of S02 from the gas stream leaving
       the fabric filter. Most local ordinances will prohibit the discharge of very acidic
       water into sewers  or natural bodies of water, and some method of neutralizing
       the scrubber water will be required.

              In this circumstance, a single wet scrubbing  system may serve both the
       particulate collection and sulfur oxide scrubbing functions. Figure 23 illustrates
       a combination of scrubbing system with neutralization of the waste water.

              b.     SPECIFICATIONS AND COSTS

              As in previous sections, the costs compiled  for  lead  reverberatory
       furnaces  were based  on  a  standard specification  plus  two  pages written
       especially for the lead furnace and the particulate collector specified.

                                   FABRIC FILTER

              The process description  used  in the  specification is given in Table 51.
       Operating conditions for the usual three furnace sizes and two efficiency levels
       are listed in Table  52. The prices quoted are summarized in Table 53.

              As is usually the case, a  single fabric filter quotation was presented in
       response  to both efficiency  levels,  on  the basis that the fabric  filter will
       ordinarily produce a very high efficiency. The prices are plotted in Figure  24
       for ease of interpolation.


-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE, INC.
                                           Table 51

                         FABRIC COLLECTOR PROCESS DESCRIPTION
                   FOR LEAD REVERBERATORY FURNACE SPECIFICATIONS
               The fabric filter is to serve a reverberatory furnace used to recover lead from lead
        oxide, lead scrap, and dross materials. The charge to the furnace will consist of lead scrap,
        battery plates, and lead dross. The furnace is fired with natural gas.

               The air pollution control system is to capture fumes from the furnace flue arid from
        a fume collection hood.  These are brought into a single insulated duct. This duct passes
        horizontally through the building wall at an elevation of 20' above grade. A high surf ace area
        "U-tube"  cooling section without insulation is provided outside the building, followed by a
        dilution air damper to reduce the final temperature from  1000°F to 270°F. The filter is to
        be located on grade adjacent to the building.  The fan following the filter will be located on a
        shed roof 28' above grade, and will discharge into a new 70' stack.

               The fabric filter is to operate in such a manner that a single compartment (with no
        more than one quarter of the total collecting surface area) can be isolated for shaking. The
        hopper is  to have sufficient  capacity to hold the dust collected over a 24 hour period
        without interfering with normal operation of the collector.  The dust outlet should be a
        minimum of 8'0" above grade in order to provide for truck access. The hopper valve is to be
        included in the quotation.

               Dacron tubular bags shall be used with  a gas/cloth ratio of 1.0 CFM/FT^ or less at
        operating conditions.

               Auxiliaries are defined, for purposes of this specification, as:
                             ID
                             12)
Fan and drive
Dampers

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE, INC.
                                          Table  52


                          FABRIC FILTER OPERATING  CONDITIONS

                          FOR LEAD REVERBERATORY  FURNACE
        Three  sizes  of  fabric collectors  are  to be quoted. While two levels of efficiency are
        specified, it  is expected that a single fabric quotation will be supplied for each size range.
        Furnace Capacity, ton
        Melting Rate, Ib/hr
        Inlet gas volume, ACFM
        Inlet gas temperature, °F
        Inlet loading, Ib/hr
                   Small

                      10
                   1,000
                   5,000
                    270
                     57
Medium

    25
 2,500
10,000
   270
   130
 Large

    50
 5,000
20,000
   270
   260
        Outlet loading, Ib/hr
        Outlet loading, gr/ACF
        Efficiency, wt. %
Case 1 - LA Process Weight

                   2.80        4.64         6.67
                   0.065       0.054        0.039
                  94.6         96.4        97.4
        Outlet loading, Ib/hr
        Outlet loading, gr/ACF
        Efficiency, wt. %
 Case 2 — High Efficiency

                   0.43         0.86         1.72
                   0.01         0.01         0.01
                  99.2         99.34       99.34

-------
    INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING  INSTITUTE, INC.
                                  Table 53
                            Fabric Collector Cost Data
                         for Lead Reverberatory Furnaces
INFORMATION
Process Capacity, ton/day
Inlet Gas Volume, ACFM
Efficiency, Wt.l
Controlled Emission, gr/ACF
Type of Charge
Inlet Gas Temperature, F
System Horsepower
Equipment Cost, $
A. Collector
B. Auxiliaries
C. Gas Conditioning Equipment
D. Waste Equipment
E. Other
Total
Installation Cost, $
A. Grass-Roots
B. Add -On*
Expected Life, Years
Operating and Maintenance $/year
FABRIC FILTER
SMALL
10
5,000
99.5
<0.01
«— lead scr
270
15
7,240.00
4,015.00
14,500.00
25,755.00
19,320.00
25
$2,592.00
MEDIUM
25
10,000
99.5
<0.01
ip and dro
270
30
13,020.00
5,802.00
29,798.00
48,620.00
36,475.00
LARGE
50
20,000
99.5
<0.01
c c . . ..v

270
60
26,040.00
11,392.00
58,396.00
95,828.00
71,875.00
25 1 25
$4,536.0(J $9,072.00
*  Installation  costs would be same as  grass  roots

-------
INDUSTRIAL  GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC.
                              Figure 24


                       Cost of Fabric Collectors for


                       Lead Reverberatory Furnaces
           rt
           o
          Q
           o

           en
          T3
           a
           rt
           o
           O
           u
              300
              200
              100
                70
50
                30
                20
                10
= = = = = =|ErE:f||:EE:Ei:Ei!iiE II : EEE

r Turnkey Installat
E for Grass Roots P
"in ' T ' i







— i 	 ] 	 1'.. 	 1 	 1 1 —
	 ,2 	
	 	 	 .,!
_ 	 ,i ! 	 ! ..

i '
f t '
f *
LMil 1 m
IsSigBiSSSigiiggsm


1 1 1 1 1 ] 1 1 1 ! 1 1 1 1 1 M 1 !|l|li LM" 1 1 1 i | j 1 1
ion 	 i — 	

lant ! 	 :::::::: : :



( '
I '
, * .
t* -'
f '
	 "~49 	
= !!==; Fabric Collector §
::=:=: Auxiliary Equipment
	 	 ?' 	 	
*-- 	 • -
..j 	 	 .... . . 	 	 ._ 	
- Fabric Collector
:: Only






SiiisisBSSiisBliiil^H
                   10
                20     30         60       100


            Process  Capacity, Ton/Dav

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE,  INC
        so-
                     WET  SCRUBBERS

  The wet scrubber specifications were written without any reference to
removal,  as  this  is the most representative  of current  practice. The
        specification material  is given  in  Tables  54 and 55. The prices quoted  are
        summarized in Tables 56 and 57 for the LA-Process Weight and High Efficiency
        cases. Figure 25 is a log - log plot of the cost data for the High Efficiency case.

               c.     DISCUSSION OF COSTS

               There is a  first cost advantage in favor  of the fabric collector in  the
        smaller size range,  which disappears as the gas volume increases. This is because
        the filter cost increases more nearly in proportion to the gas flow than does the
        scrubber cost.  It is also apparent that the cost of pre-cooling the gas stream for
        the filter becomes very high for  the larger sizes.  A more economical  design
        might have resulted if air dilution were used to a greater extent for the larger
        filter. The horsepower cost associated with  the wet scrubber is a significant
        factor for the larger sizes.

               Many  of  the  comments  made   for the  lead cupola  apply to  the
        reverberatory furnace,  because of the advantages of combining the  effluents
        from these two operations into a single stream to be processed through a fabric
        filter or scrubber. In particular, the possibility of 862 emission control coupled
        with  stringent  regulation  of   lead  particulate  emissions  suggests  that
        combinations of scrubbers and fabric filters may become necessary.

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE, INC
                                            Table  54

                            WET  SCRUBBER  PROCESS DESCRIPTION
                   FOR  LEAD  REVERBERATORY  FURNACE  SPECIFICATION
                The scrubber is to serve a reverberatory furnace used to recover lead from lead oxide,
         lead scrap, and dross materials. The furnace is fired with natural gas.

                The air pollution control system is to capture fumes from the furnace flue and from
         a fume collection hood, which are brought into a single insulated duct.  This duct passes
         through the building wall at an elevation 20' above grade. The scrubber is to be located at
         grade outside the building. The fan will be located after the scrubber on adjacent shed roof
         approximately 20' above grade, and will discharge into a new 70' stack. The ductwork ahead
         of the scrubber  is to be refractory-lined carbon steel, while  the outlet ductwork is to be
         rubber-lined carbon steel. The scrubber is to be constructed of 304 L stainless steel wherever
         wetted by the scrubbing liquor.

                The external piping and pumps will be  of rubber-lined  carbon steel or equivalent.
         The liquor containing the paniculate matter is to be discharged  into a settling pond within
         WO' of the scrubber. The scrubber pressure drop shall be no less than 50" wg equivalent
         energy input for the LA-Process Weight specification and no less  than 60"  wg pressure drop
         equivalent energy input for the high efficiency case.

                For purposes of this quotation, auxiliaries shall include:
                              (1)
                              (2)
                              (3)
                              (4)
                              (5)
Fan
Pump or pumps
External piping
Controls
Dampers

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE,  INC.
                                         Table  55


                         WET SCRUBBER  OPERATING CONDITIONS

                  FOR LEAD  REVERBERATORY FURNACE SPECIFICATION


        Three sizes of scrubbers are to be quoted for each of two levels of collection efficiency.
        Furnace Capacity, ton
        Melting rate, Ib/hr
        Inlet gas volume ACFM
        Inlet temperature, °^
        Inlet loading, Ib/hr
        Inlet loading, gr/ACF
        Outlet gas volume, ACFM
        Outlet gas temperature, °F
                    (A)
                   Small

                     10
                   1,000
                  5,000
                    500
                     52
                    2.5
                  3,500
                    140
   (B)
Medium

    25
 2,500
11,800
   500
   130
   2.5
 8,260
   140
    50
 5,000
23,600
   500
   260
   2.5
16,520
   140
        Outlet loading, Ib/hr
        Outlet loading, gr/ACF
        Efficiency, wt. %
Case 1 - LA Process Weight

                  2.80        4.64        6.67
                  0.09        0.066       0.047
                 94.6        96.4        97.4
        Outlet loading, Ib/hr
        Outlet loading, gr/ACF
        Efficiency, wt. %
 Case 2 — High Efficiency

                  0.30        0.71         1.42
                  0.01        0.01         0.01
                 99.4        99.4        99.4

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE,  INC.
                                Table 56
                        Wet Scrubber Cost Data for
                        Lead Reverberatory Furnace
                           (LA-Process Weight)
INFORMATION
Process Capacity, Ton/Day
Inlet Gas Volume, ACFM
Efficiency, Wt.l
Controlled Emission, gr /ACF
Type of Charge
Inlet Gas Temperature, F
System Horsepower
Equipment Cost, $
A. Collector
B. Auxiliaries
C. Gas Conditioning Equipment
D. Waste Equipment
E. Other
Total
Installation Cost, $
A. brass-Roots
B. Add-On
Expected Life, Years
Operating and Maintenance
$/Year
WET SCRUBBER
SMALL
10
5,000
94.6
.09
Proc
500
55
14,200
44,700
58,900
25,800
28,000
10
1,000
MEDIUM
25
11,800
96.4
.066
;ss Descri
500
125
14,200
41,600
55,800
25,800
28,000
10
1,000
LARGE
50
23,600
97.4
.047
ption
500
250
17,200
49,600
66,900
27,000
30,000
10
1,000

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS  CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC.
                               Table 57
                       Wet Scrubber Cost Data for




                       Lead Reverberatory Furnace



                            (High Efficiency)
INFORMATION
Process Capacity, Ton/Day
Inlet Gas Volume, ACFM
Efficiency, Wt.%
Controlled Emission, gr/ACF
Type of Charge
Inlet Gas Temperature, F
System Horsepower
Equipment Cost, $
A. Collector
B. Auxiliaries
C. Gas Conditioning Equipment
D. Waste Equipment
E. Other
Total
Installation Cost, $
A. Grass-Roots
B. Add-On
Expected Life, Years
Operating and Maintenance
$/year
WET SCRUBBER
SMALL
10
5,000
99.4
.01
Proc
500
65
14,200
48,500
62,700
26,400
29,000
10
1,000
MEDIUM
25
11,800
9-9.4
.01
ess Descri
500
150
14,200
49,600
63,800
26,400
29,000
10
1,000
LARGE
50
23,600
99.4
.01
ption
500
300
17,200
56,400
73,600
29,000
32,000
10
1,000

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING  INSTITUTE, INC.
                             Figure 25


                       Costs of Wet Scrubbers for


                      Lead Reverberatory Furnaces

                         (High Efficiency Case)
         300   -
     rt   200
     o
     Q
     rt
     t/i
     3
     o
     X
     H
     O
     u
         100
70
50
          30
          20
          10
                   Turnkey Installation
                   for Grass Roots Plant
                      10
                                     (LA Process Weight)
                                    Wet  Scrubber $
                                    Auxiliary Equipment
                                    Wet  Scrubber Only
                     25
50
100
                      Process  Capacity, Ton/Day

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE,  INC
       6.
AIR  POLLUTION CONTROL  FOR ZINC CALCINATION
FURNACES
              Prior to this program and through the initial stages of the program, the
       member  companies  approached this  industrial  category  on the  basis  of
       experience with primary smelting furnaces. As the program proceeded, it
       became apparent that the calcination operation was quite limited in secondary
       smelting.

              As a result, it was not possible to assemble meaningful information on
       past  installations,  costs,  and  performance for  secondary zinc  calcining
       operations. The following discussion is  limited to the way "calcination" fits
       into the  secondary zinc smelting business, and  the problems which may  be
       encountered in this area. A more complete description of the other  processes
       carried out by secondary  zinc  smelters  is  included in the "Air  Pollution
       Engineering Manual" published by NAPCA. These processes include:

                     1.     Zinc Sweating
                     2.     Zinc Melting in
                           a.   Crucibles
                           b.   Pot furnaces
                           c.   Kettles
                           d.   Reverberatory furnaces
                           e.   Electric induction furnaces
                     3.     Zinc retorting for
                           a.   Reduction of zinc oxide
                           b.   Purification of zinc
                     4.     Burning to produce zinc oxide

              a.      PROCESS DESCRIPTION

              Zinc calcining is the process of heating zinc carbonate ores or secondary
       zinc  materials  to  drive*  off  gaseous dissociation  products which  may be
       detrimental  to subsequent  treatment  or  to product use. The process was
       originally developed to remove water of hydration and  carbon dioxide from
       zinc carbonate ores prior to processing in horizontal retort furnaces.

              Mines which once produced zinc carbonate ores are now depleted and
       alternate  methods of treating oxidized ores have been developed. Therefore,
       calcination practices in the secondary zinc industry are now limited  to a few
       applications  in  which  chlorine,  fluorine,  carbon  and  other unwanted
       contaminants are removed from zinc oxide.

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC.
               The calcination of carbonate ores is similar to a drying operation with
        temperatures ranging from  750 °C for  zinc minerals  to 1470°C for gangue
        minerals. Up to 30 percent of the ore's original weight  is given off as carbon
        dioxide and water as described by the following chemical equation:
                      ZnC03  • x(H20)
                                    PAST PRACTICE

               The process was originally  carried out in circular brick kilns about 10
        feet in diameter and 20 feet high which were capable of treating approximately
        40 tons of ore per day using  2 to 4 tons of fuel. Ore and fuel were charged in
        alternate layers and combustion air was admitted through tuyeres around the
        base. The shaft  furnace,  in  which  the charge was heated  from external
        fireboxes, was also used because it resulted in a product free from fuel ash.

               Circular brick  kilns and shaft furnaces were superseded by rotary kilns.
        These rotary kilns consisted of a horizontally inclined steel cylinder sloped 2 to
        4  percent of its length. The kilns were supported on rollers and rotated via a
        pinion drive and large wheel attached to the shell of the kiln. Crude zinc oxide
        was passed countercurrently to the heating gases. Fume and dust were pulled
        through the  kiln  to a dust collection system using an induced draft fan. The
        collection systems consisted of a  mechanical collector/cooler and a baghouse or
        an electrostatic precipitator.

                               Present  Uses of Calcination

               The few companies that continue to  utilize calcination methods on zinc
        materials have established that the  multiple-hearth rabbling furnace is the most
        satisfactory device for zinc  calcination since  dust carry-over is low, fuel
        consumption is not excessive and  maintenance costs are  minimal. Refractory
        lined rotary kilns are currently used to treat zinc oxide from fuming operations
        where  de-leading is practiced at temperatures  above the generally accepted
        figure for calcination.

               One of the  few remaining applications of calcination in the secondary
        zinc industry is the treatment of  zinc oxides from fuming operations.  Zinc
        galvanizing skimmings are melted down to remelt zinc and the fines emanating
        from the remelt pot are collected and calcined to recover zinc oxide from the
        zinc ammonium chloride used as a galvanizing flux.  The product is used as an

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE/INC.
       additive  in fertilizers and cattle feeds and as a raw material for chemical or
       metallic  zinc production.

              Very little information has been  published recently on zinc calcination
       processes. C.  H.  Mathewson describes two  foreign applications;  one at the
       Baelen  plant  of  the Societe des  Mines et  Fonderies  de Zinc de la Vieille
       Montagne and the second at the Flin Flon, Manitoba plant of the Hudson Bay
       Mining and  Smelting Company. At the  Baelen plant, 20 tons per day of zinc
       oxides from slag reduction furnaces are treated in a six-hearth wedge furnace to
       remove carbon and to complete the oxidation of the constituent elements. The
       dust carry-over is less than 2 percent, practically all of which is recovered in a
       standard baghouse. The Flin Flon plant  treats 130  tons per day of zinc oxide
       fume from the slag-fuming plant in two seven-hearth wedge furnaces to remove
       chlorine, fluorine and sulfur dioxide. The calcined product is used to  produce
       zinc by the electrolytic process.

                            Air Pollution Control Equipment

              Member companies of  the  Industrial Gas Cleaning Institute  have  no
       record of  recent  gas cleaning installations  in  the secondary  zinc calcining
       industry. Because so few zinc calcining plants remain in operation in the United
       States today,  it is difficult to obtain data on air pollutants emitted from the
       process. A detailed discussion of equipment for the recovery of particulates and
       fume would not be relevant. Zinc oxide  particulate emissions are characterized
       by extremely small particle size. Gaseous emissions will  depend on the type
       of contaminants calcined  from  the zinc oxide.  Operating conditions and
       material  of construction of zinc calcining gas cleaning  equipment  must  be
       selected  with great care in order to minimize corrosion  and chemical deterior-
       ation inherent with many of these gaseous emissions.

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS  CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC
                                 REFERENCES
       1.     Danielson, John A., "Air Pollution Engineering Manual",
                  NAPCA, Public Health Service Publication No. 999-AP-40

       2.     Mathewson, C. H., "Zinc — The Metal, Its Alloys and Compounds",
                  Reinhold, N.Y., 1959

       3.     Pomeroy, J. N. and Crowley, J. E., "Sources and Recovery of Scrap Zinc",
                  Metallurgical Extraction, Circulation 1959

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING   INSTITUTE,  INC
        7.     AIR  POLLUTION  CONTROL  FOR ALUMINUM CHLORINATION
               STATIONS
               a.
PROCESS DESCRIPTION
               The secondary smelting of aluminum involves the removal of a variety
        of impurities, both solid and gaseous. These are removed by the introduction of
        a flux  which reacts chemically with  the impurities producing  a phase which
        separates from  the  hot melt. This discussion  is concerned with the use of
        chlorine as the fluxing agent.

               The  impurities  in  the aluminum  may  consist of "dirt" or solid
        refractory oxides, gases  (typically dissolved hydrogen) or metallic components,
        such as magnesium which are present as alloying ingredients. The introduction
        of chlorine  by bubbling it through  the melt, serves to agitate the bath, and at
        the same time,  combine with the impurities to  produce a free vapor or an
        insoluble dross which will float to the top.

               During the  fluxing process some  of the aluminum reacts with  the
        chlorine to form AlClg which is readily sublimed from the melt. This is vented
        from the furnace as a gas or rapidly hydrolized with the atmospheric moisture
        present to form solid alumina, A^Og, and hydrogen chloride. The amount of
        the AlClg production depends to a large extent on the amount of magnesium in
        the melt which competes for the available chlorine producing a MgC^ dross.

               The  nearly  complete  elimination of fumes vented from the furnace
        which include AICI-;
      AI203,
HCI, and unreacted chlorine can be attained in
        wet  scrubbing equipment capable of both high energy  impingement of the
        submicron particulate and absorption of the gaseous components.
               1)
MANUFACTURING ASPECTS
               Furnaces generally used for fluxing  are  of  20,000 to 200,000 Ib.
        capacity, completely enclosed, but having charging doors,  side access doors,
        and a roof vent used for natural draft ventilation  of combustion products and
        fumes. Gas or  oil  fired burners are used to melt the charge and  maintain
        temperature,  but are  normally turned  off  during  chlorination. (Separate
        reverberatory  furnaces may  be  used  for the  melting and fluxing  steps
        permitting a semi-continuous operation.)  The melting point of the aluminum
        alloy  is approximately  1220°F; however, the  melt may be heated to 2000°F
        and maintained  in the molten state during chlorination due to the heat capacity
        of the refractory lining and molten metal.

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE,  INC.
               The charge material  may  consist of  foundry rejects or mill ends,
        miscellaneous scrap, or pig aluminum. When  the charge contains significant
        amounts  of  oil,  grease,  or paint the  problem  of the  production of  a
        carbonaceous smoke is present which  can be treated  by controlled oxidation.
        This  problem is not discussed  here.  Chlorine is normally  introduced with
        carbon lances extending through side ports in the furnace wall. Liquid chlorine
        is metered into the lance which is submerged beneath the surface of the melt.
        The bubbling action, produced mechanically, floats the solid impurities to the
        surface  where they are later skimmed as  a dross. The chlorine combines with
        dissolved  hydrogen producing HCI which is vented through  breeching to the
        stack. Where separate  melting and  holding  hearths are  used,  an initial
        chlorination  may take  place in the  melting hearth to remove  the gross
        impurities prior  to  transferring the  melt  to  the holding  hearth.  For  this
        operation, a  "wand" consisting of metal tube connected to the chlorine supply
        is manually  extended through  one of the  doors. The amount of chlorine
        introduced at this time is normally a small fraction of  the total used. Following
        the chlorination, alloying material  may be added to attain the desired metal
        product.

               The amount of chlorine used varies greatly, and is generally dependent
        on the final magnesium content desired.  Removing the last several tenths of a
        percent of magnesium is a slow process, and large excesses of chlorine are used
        to speed up the reaction. Chlorine  rates may be equivalent to a total chlorine
        consumption of from 5-40 Ibs. per 1000 Ibs. of metal over a period of from 20
        minutes to several hours. Thus for example, it is possible to add as much as
        1000 Ibs/hr of chlorine to a 100,000 Ib. melt for a period of 4 hours.

               Following chlorination, the melt is removed from the furnace through a
        trough and is cast into pigs, billets or a variety of miscellaneous shapes at a site
        adjacent  to  the  furnace. The  time required  for the entire sequence from
        charging to casting is typically  24 hours. However, it may range  from several
        hours to  several  days depending on the  nature of the overall operation. An
        overall process flow scheme is sketched in  Figure 26.

                                Nature of Air  Pollutants

               The introduction of chlorine into an aluminum bath presents some very
        difficult air  handling and fume elimination problems. The vent gases are at
        temperatures from 500-2000°F,  and contain both free chlorine and  hydrogen
        chloride gases.  The gases must  be  quenched prior to scrubbing.  This  creates
        metallurgical problems at  the  hot-cold  and  gas-liquid  interface. The fume
        generated  is  composed of sub-micron  AlClg and  A^Og. Hydrogen chloride  is

-------
                                                                        FLUE  GAS
                               WATER
                               QUENCH
•COMBUSTION AIR


 FUEL GAS OR OIL
    CHLORINE
     GAS
 VENTURI
CONTACTOR
          GAS
       ABSORPTION
        TOWER
                                                       MIST ELIMINATOR
             ALUMINUM
               PRODUCT
                                                  SURGE
                                                  TANK
                                CAUSTIC
                                  TANK
                                    Figure 26



-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC.
        produced in the furnace and in the quench chamber. This gas along with free
        unreacted  chlorine are in  such  quantities that a significant amount of gas
        contaminant must be handled.
               2)
AIR POLLUTION CONTROL
               Submicron  AlClg and A^Og produced  in the chlorinating furnace
        requires high  pressure drop impaction in a wet scrubbing system. Significant
        quantities of  hydrogen chloride and chlorine require gas absorption using a
        basic scrubbing liquor, normally NaOH. Therefore a system for storage, mixing,
        control and disposal of the liquid stream is needed. This equipment is auxiliary
        to the basic air handling equipment.

               A  fume control  system  for the elimination of both paniculate and
        gaseous components can  be designed and sized with knowledge of a few basic
        furnace operating parameters.

                           Furnace Ventilation  Requirements

               Furnace vents and stacks are sized to remove the hot combustion gases
        produced during maximum burner firing. During chlorination, the burners are
        off and   therefore  the   gas volumes  and  temperatures  are  much  lower.
        Calculations based on standard industrial ventilation  techniques could  be
        performed where the exact condition of the furnace as regards doors, cracks,
        temperatures, etc. are known. The best possible method of determining actual
        ventilation requirement is on-site volumetric  measurements taken downstream
        of a damper which can regulate the  flow. This damper should be adjusted to a
        point where the desired furnace draft is  obtained or where the furnace draft is
        just sufficient to prevent chlorine from escaping through the doors into the
        room during a period of maximum chlorine usage. The volume measured at this
        time will  be  the  minimum required. Of  course, the temperature should  be
        determined concurrently.

               Experience has provided  some  approximate  volume flow rates for
        various furnace sizes which may be used for estimation or where calculation or
        measurement is difficult.
               Holding Capacity, Ibs.

                    50,000
                    100,000
                    150,000
                    200,000
                               Ventilation
                         Volume, ACFM @ 1000°F

                                  5,600
                                  7,500
                                  9,500
                                 11,000

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING   INSTITUTE,  INC
              The above values  may be considered reasonable for a "tight" furnace
       i.e. with doors closed and with minimum leakage.

                       Contaminant Identity and  Concentration

              The  major  air  control  problem  for  chlorine  fluxing furnaces  is
       collection of the submicron fume emitted during periods of high chlorine usage
       and low magnesium content. The particulate entering the vent system may be
       either AlClg or  A^Og (or even some other aluminum compounds). On passing
       through the cooling chamber the chloride is hydrolized, and it is reasonable to
       consider  all the aluminum entering the scrubber  to be the oxide. Therefore,
       differentiation between various aluminum compounds is an academic question.
       According to the stoichiometry, a  maximum of 47.9  Ibs. of A^Og are
       produced for each  100 Ibs. of chlorine charged. Using this as a basis along with
       the approximate ventilation requirement given above, it can be shown that the
       maximum grain  loading will be between  1 and 3 gr/SCF/100 Ib/hr chlorine
       usage.

              A  similar analysis  using  stoichiometry  may  be used  to  calculate
       maximum HCI emissions.

              On-site testing during periods of chlorination will, of course, yield the
       most reliable loading data. The test procedure of the  IGCI with an impinger
       followed by a fine porosity filter are recommended. The intent is to analyze for
       total  aluminum  content  through   such  methods  as   atomic  absorption
       spectroscopy, and  present the  results as AI203  (rather  than attempting  to
       differentiate between  various aluminum compounds which is a difficult and
       unrewarding exercise). Quantities of HCI  and C^ can also be determined  by
       suitable liquid absorption techniques using wet impingers.

              The question of size distribution is again one that becomes academic,
       and  such determinations  are  always subject  to  doubt  due to procedural
       difficulties in obtaining the sample. This is true for most submicron material,
       but is  particularly  true for A^Og  -  AlClg  mixture  since the AlClg  has a
       significant vapor pressure even  at temperatures below its sublimation point.
       Therefore, some of the gaseous AlClg will be condensing in any collection
       device  defying  its  size characterization. One of the most useful methods of
       indicating size  is  to relate  the difficulty  of collection by  the  intended
       mechanism (in this case impaction wet scrubbing) to a theoretical size. Thus if
       a 40 inch pressure drop across a Venturi scrubber were required to collect 95%
       of the  Al+++ present, this could be related to a fictitious size which may  be
       defined theoretically.

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS CLEANING    INSTITUTE, INC.
       A miniature Venturi contactor has been used for on-site testing, and has been
       successful in predicting the "apparent" mean size of the submicron particulate
       present in aluminum fluxing furnace emissions.

                               The Abatement System
              The  items  of  process equipment shown in  Figure  26 are discussed
       below:
              a)      Cooling Chamber — Prior to entering the scrubber, the hot gases
                     must be cooled and saturated to reduce the volume and protect
                     the remainder of the system. Gas temperatures are between 500
                     -  1500°F,  and  are rapidly  quenched to approximately the
                     adiabatic saturation temperature. Corrosion is severe  in the
                     chlorine-free chloride, hot-cold, gas-liquid  area of the quench
                     chamber. Typical  construction may be of two general types:
                     one is a nickel  alloy  construction (Ni200, Incoloy 825, or
                     Hastelloy)  which  resists  corrosion,  is  light in  weight,  and
                     requires a relatively small space requirement; the second is a
                     refractory acid  brick  construction which  may  be reinforced
                     structurally with a rubber  lined steel shell.

              b)      Venturi  Contactor — The cooled and saturated gases enter the
                     Venturi   contactor where the  particulate impinges  on the
                     atomized water  droplets.  The Venturi may be constructed of
                     acid and chloride resistant materials,  such as nickel alloys or
                     plastic materials.  Plastic  or rubber coatings must  be able to
                     resist  flaking, chipping or peeling in the high  velocity throat
                     section and are generally not recommended. An atmospheric
                     damper  is generally provided at the  entrance to the venturi
                     section to permit draft control of the furnace.

              c)      Gas Absorption Tower — Adequate gas-liquid contact must be
                     provided  to eliminate HCI and Cl 2- A caustic liquor is generally
                     required  to  absorb the C^  and also eliminate handling and
                     disposal   of  acid  liquors.  The  small  amounts of  particulate
                     passing  the  Venturi  and/or  recirculating  in   the  slurry
                     necessitates the tower  be  of a non-plugging type, either a spray
                     tower or mobile packed bed. The tower construction may be of
                     plastic or rubber lined construction.

              d)      Mist Eliminator — Normally this is integral with the scrubbing

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE,  INC
                    tower for the elimination of liquid carryover. Again, it should
                    be of a non-plugging type such as a centrifugal collector.

             e)     Fans  and  Motors  —  The  possibility  of  small  amounts  of
                    carryover and  condensation necessitate  the use of corrosion
                    resistant materials on all internal  parts of the fans. Plastic or
                    rubber coatings on  housings are common, and where tip speeds
                    are relatively low can also be used to coat the fan wheel. It is
                    often difficult to  specify  such  low rpm,  and stainless  steel
                    wheels are necessary for medium  ranges up to their top speed
                    limit. (Hastelloy wheels can be  used at  the higher  speeds).
                    General practice is to limit the rpm to, say less than 2000, and
                    connect  a  number  of fans in  series to develop the necessary
                    static pressure.  An inlet damper  and  fan drains  should  be
                    specified.

             f)     Stack —  As the existing stack must be used to ventilate the hot
                    combustion product, it is generally unsuitable for the cold and
                    moist  scrubber discharge.  Plastic or plastic-coated  steel  is
                    generally used with  heights normally just sufficient to rise above
                    roof lines.

             g)     Surge Tank —  A tank having 2-3  minutes hold-up time at the
                    existing recirculation rate is desirable. It is, of course, important
                    to maintain enough caustic value  in the recirculating system to
                    handle a complete chlorination  cycle, and this  may be the
                    overriding consideration for sizing the surge tank.  Continuous,
                    controlled addition of caustic may eliminate this requirement.
                    Generally  the  slurry  concentration  accumulated  over  a
                    chlorination period  is not a  factor in tank sizing, but should be
                    investigated.

             h)     Recirculation Pump — Must be of suitable material to handle
                    alkaline and chloride containing liquor.

             i)     Caustic  Storage Tank —  A 50% sodium  hydroxide solution is
                    available from  suppliers  and  this eliminates the  necessity  of
                    handling and mixing solid material. The solution must be kept
                    above 75°F to prevent freezing, and therefore, provision should
                    be made for external heating of the tank and piping.

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC
              j)      Controls - In addition to the major items of equipment listed
                     above, the system must be ducted and piped to connect the
       components. A  variety of control  schemes can be used to insure sufficient
       addition  of caustic to  prevent failure due to  presence of acidic liquor. pH
       indication followed by  manual or automatic, batch or continuous control  is
       required.  Safety  electrical interlocks  are, of  course, necessary  to  prevent
       temperature  excursions  which  could  damage  equipment.  In  all cases, an
       emergency bypass to the combustion stack should be provided.

              b.     SPECIFICATIONS AND COSTS

              The aluminum  chlorination  application is the  only application for
       which only one type  of  air pollution control  equipment  was considered
       suitable.  The  high  concentration of gaseous hydrogen chloride and  chlorine
       require the use  of wet  scrubbing to conform  to good  air pollution control
       practice.

              Although it is possible to  provide good control by using a scrubber in
       combination with a fabric filter or electrostatic precipitator, such combinations
       are likely to be less economical.  The specifications furnished the equipment
       manufacturers to serve as a basis for their bid prices are written around  a
       scrubber alone.

              The process description submitted as a part of  the specification for the
       scrubber installation  is  shown in Table 58.  The  operating conditions for
       purposes of this quotation are  summarized in Table 59. As in each of the
       previous cases, the  complete specification can be  reproduced by inserting the
       material  in these two tables in the Sample Specification given in  Appendix IV.

              The equipment  and installation costs submitted  in  response to these
       specifications  are summarized in Table 60 and Table 61. The former  covers a
       particulate emission regulation equivalent to the LA-Process Weight regulation,
       while the latter produces a high particulate collection efficiency. There is likely
       to  be a noticeable particulate  residual plume after the  water plume has
       dispersed in the lower  efficiency case,  whereas there should be little visible
       emission other than water in the high efficiency case.

              Both of  the specifications are based on  removal of particulate matter.
       This is because the control  of the submicron fume produced by the chlorine
       fluxing operation is much more difficult than the absorption of HCI and C^ in
       the alkaline liquor. Ordinarily either scrubber will produce good gas absorption
       (over 99% efficiency)  for  the gaseous  contaminants, and  this need  not be
       specified separately.


-------
INDUSTRIAL     GAS  CLEANING     INSTITUTE, INC.
                                            Table 58

                         WET SCRUBBER PROCESS  DESCRIPTION  FOR

                     ALUMINUM CHLORINATION STATION  SPECIFICATION

               The aluminum chlorine fluxing furnace is used to produce a variety of alloy castings.
        Charging stock is clean (non-oily) scrap consisting of mill ends, shavings, and miscellaneous
        scrap extrusions of varying magnesium content. End product will have a magnesium content
        of from 0.1  - 0.5 wt. % magnesium. Past experience has indicated that maximum chlorine
        consumption is 20 Ib. per 1000 Ibs. of melt in a 2 hour period.

               The furnace operation is such that a normal cycle lasts 24 hours — from charging to
        casting.  On an average 5 drops are made per week. Chlorination is performed in the holding
        hearth  with carbon  lances inserted through  ports  located on  the  sides of the furnace.
        Chlorination is not performed during furnace firing.

               The furnace is vented through a port located at the middle of one side through a 30
        ft. run of horizontal breeching to an 85' stack located outside of the building. At the stack
        area is a 40' x 40' area available for new equipment installation, for  which road access for
        truck-size deliveries is available. A concrete slab designed  for loads  of 500 psi covers the
        entire area. Electric power, steam, gas, and an abundant fresh water supply are available to
        the area. Sanitary sewage will accept process  water in  the range of pH 4-10 providing  that
        solids content is less than 1% by weight.

               Wet scrubbing equipment is required to reduce particulate and gaseous emissions to a
        level according to local regulations and the attached  table of operation. All materials of
        construction to be consistent with the materials handled i.e., hot, wet, chlorine and chloride,
        caustic, slurry, etc. Bids should include the following equipment:

               (1)     Quench chamber for cooling hot gases

               (2)     Wet  scrubber including  a venturi type  contactor, a  non-plugging  gas
                      absorption tower, and mist eliminator

               (3)     Fans and motors to develop necessary static pressure. Fans shall be selected
                      which will operate at less than 2000 rpm and will be arranged in series.

               (4)     85' self-supporting stack

               (5)     Recirculating tank

               (6)     50% caustic storage tank

               (7)     Interconnecting ductwork and piping for all equipment furnished.  Ductwork
                      shall begin at furnace-stack breeching

               (8)     Appropriate  control:  dampers,  valves, motors,  controllers, pH,  safety
                      interlocks, etc.

               With  the exception of the scrubber proper, the above  items are to be  treated as
        auxiliaries for quotation purposes.

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE,  INC.
                                        Table  59


                      WET SCRUBBER  OPERATING  CONDITIONS FOR

                   ALUMINUM CHLORINATION  STATION SPECIFICATION
       Separate quotations are  to be made for the following three conditions, and for each
       efficiency level specified.
                                                     Small
                              Medium
Large
       Furnace capacity, Ib.
       Melting rate, Ib/hr
       Inlet gas volume, ACFM
       Inlet gas temp., °F
       Inlet loading, Ib/hr
       Inlet loading, gr/ACF
       Outlet gas volume, ACFM
       Outlet temperature,  F
30,000
1,250
4,800
1,000
150
3.65
2,560
150
60,000
2,500
6,000
1,000
300
5.84
3,200
150
200,000
8,333
11,200
1,000
1,000
10.4
6,000
150
       Outlet loading, Ib/hr
       Outlet loading, gr/ACF
       Efficiency, wt. %
Case 1 - LA Process Weight

                  3.19         4.64         8.93
                  0.15         0.17         0.19
                 97.9        98.5         99.0
       Outlet loading, Ib/hr
       Outlet loading, gr/ACF
       Efficiency, wt. %
 Case 2 — High Efficiency

                  0.44         0.55         1.03
                  0.02         0.02         0.02
                 99.7        99.8         99.9

-------
 INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE,  INC
                                Table 60
                         Wet Scrubber Cost Data for


                        Aluminum Chlorination Station

                            (LA-Process Weight)
INFORMATION
Process Capacity, Ton/Day
Inlet Gas Volume, ACFM
Efficiency, Wt.% (For Particulates) *
Controlled Emission, gr /ACF (Part .) **
Type of Charge
Inlet Gas Temperature, F
System Horsepower
Equipment Cost, $
A. Collector
B. Auxiliaries
C. Gas Conditioning Equipment *
D. Waste Equipment
E. Other
Total
Installation Cost, $.
A. Grass-Roots
B. Add-On
Expected Life, Years
Operating and Maintenance, $/year
Caustic
Labor
Part'1
WET SCRUBBER
SMALL
15
4,800
* 97.9
0.15
Misc. Sc:
1,000
40
14,000
40,000
3,900
6,100
64,000
58,000
78,000
10
•^ '?nQ
MEDIUM
30
6,000
98.5
0.17
•ap Al (no
1,000
60
15,800
47,500
4,300
8,100
75,700
66,000
88,000
10
ii\m
^ ann
LARGE
100
11,200
99.0
0.19
n-oily)
1,000
120
21,600
69,000
6,100
12,000
108,700
90,000
120,000
10
s!soo
*  Spray Cooler
** HC1 and Cl£  Efficiencies are expected to be
   99+% with  5%  caustic liquor.

-------
INDUSTRIAL  GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC
                               Table 61
                       Wet Scrubber Cost Data for

                      Aluminum Chlorination Station

                           (High Efficiency)
INFORMATION

Process Capacity, Ton/Day
Inlet Gas Volume, ACFM
Efficiency, Wt.% (For Particulates) *
Controlled Emission, gr/ACF (Part.)*
Type of Charge
Inlet Gas Temperature, F
System Horsepower
Equipment Cost, $
A. Collector
B. Auxiliaries
C. Gas Conditioning Equipment *
D. Waste Equipment
E. Other 50% Caustic tank § pump
Total
Installation Cost, $
A. Grass-Roots
B. Add-On
Expected Life, Years
Operating and Maintenance, $/year
1 Caustic
Labor
Part c
WET
SMALL
15
4,800
fe 99.7
* 0.02
Misc. £
1,000
70
14,000
49,300
3,900
6,100
73,300
60,000
80,000
10
5,000
6 000
3_ifi&5 .
SCRUBBER
MEDIUM
30
6,000
99.8
0.02
crap Al (i
1,000
100
15,800
58,500
4,300
8,100
86,700
68,500
90,500
10
4 '335

LARGE
100
11,200
99.9
0.02
ion-oily)
1,000
210
21,600
85,000
6,100
12,000
124,700
93,000
123,000
10
34,000
6 000
6.235 ,.
 Spray Cooler
** Note:  HC1  and Cl2 Efficiencies  are expected to
          be 99+% with 5 wt.% caustic liquor.

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE,  INC
             c.
                    SUMMARY COMMENTS
             The prices quoted for each of the two cases are plotted in Figures 27
       and 28. It is apparent that the cost of the equipment and installation does not
       increase sharply as the  efficiency level increases.  The power cost does go up
       with increasing efficiency because the pressure drop is increased significantly.

             It is  interesting  to note that the horsepower requirement is high, as  is
       the usual  case for high energy scrubbers,  but that the contribution this makes
       to the overall operating cost is nominal because it only operates for about 20
       hours per week. The annual cost may be estimated for the high efficiency 100
       ton unit on the basis of  1c/kw-hr and 85% motor efficiency as follows:

                    210 HP x .746 x 20 x 52 x $.01 = $1628.00/year

             Both the chemical and replacement parts costs exceed  this figure by a
       substantial margin.

             In particular, the chemical cost is high. The consumption of caustic is in
       direct proportion to the chlorine gas excess over the amount required to  react
       magnesium and other metals out of the solution. It is apparent that any action
       which reduces the chlorine usage will also  reduce the caustic consumption.

             The ratio of system cost to scrubber cost is usually high for chemical
       scrubbing  systems. For the high efficiency,  100 ton installation, the system
       equipment cost is five times the bare scrubber cost. On an installed basis, the
       system cost is nearly ten times the cost of the scrubber.

             Another significant item in the turnkey cost figures is the difference in
       installation cost estimated for an add-on system as opposed to a new, or "grass
       roots" smelter. There  isn't  enough  room  for convenient installation  of  a
       scrubbing  system in  most  secondary smelting  plants.  The  additional  cost
       involved in locating fans, scrubbers, tanks, etc. far away from the furnace, or
       on rooftop is indicated by the roughly $20,000 additional cost to install the
       system in an existing plant.

-------
INDUSTRIAL  GAS  CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC
       400


       300



       200
     rt
     o
     o
o
tfl

rt
     O
     fi
     H
     •P
     10
     8
        100
         70
50
30
         20
                                 Figure 27


                          Wet Scrubber Cost Data for


                         Aluminum Chlorination Stations

                             (LA-Process Weight)
         10
                 •H-H-H
                 iiffit
                 I
              Turnkey  Installation
              for Grass  Roots Plant
                                                   £:
                                 Wet Scrubber
                                 Auxiliary Equipment
                                            Wet Scrubber
                                               Only
                  15          30                  100
                                 «
                        Process Capacity, Ton/Day
                                                      200

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC
                                 Figure 28



                          Wet Scrubber Cost Data for

                         Aluminum Chlorination Stations

                              (High Efficiency)
   rt
   O
   a
   •n
   £
   rt
   t/>
   3
   O
   O
   u
       400



       300
200 -~
       100
 70
        50
        30
        20
        10
                 Turnkey Installation
                 for  Grass Roots Plant
                                       Wet Scrubber  f,
                                       Auxiliary  Equipment
                                            Wet Scrubber  i
                                               Only
           10     15         30                  100

                        Process Capacity,  Ton/Day
                                                      200

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE,  INC.
             c.
DISCUSSION OF COSTS
             For each of the areas covered, with the exception of zinc calcination,
      the cost estimates presented by the IGCI member companies form a reasonably
      complete and consistent pattern.
             1.
COMPARISON OF INSTALLED COSTS
             The first costs may be generalized in two ways. The ventilation rate
      specified in this study can be taken as a good estimate of the "proper" rate for
      furnaces of various sizes. The cost of air pollution control equipment can be
      read from the appropriate data plot as a  function of  furnace capacity. Or, the
      costs may  be generalized in terms of the cost  per CFM of  gas treated. This
      provides the best  basis for estimating costs but requires knowledge of the flue
      gas rate for a  particular furnace.

             Both  bases have been used to generalize capital costs collected in this
      study. The two cautions suggested in previous sections must be repeated:

             (1)    Only very rough estimates of capital  cost should be based on
      the  "cost — furnace  size" relationships  given  here, for  the  ventilation
      requirement may  vary greatly from one furnace to another,  even though both
      have the same rated capacity.

             (2)    Capital costs based on actual gas flows are approximate at best.
      Quotations from  reputable  manufacturers  of  equipment or  competent air
      pollution engineering specialists should  be  used  in  estimating  the cost of a
      particular installation.

                             COST VS. FURNACE SIZE

             The "cost — furnace" size relationship is illustrated in the log—log plots
      included in Section B. This relationship may be written mathematically as:

             COST =  k (SIZE) x

              where:
              COST =  cost of installation in dollars
              k     = constant
              SIZE  = furnace size (usually in ton/day)
              x     = exponent

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE,  INC.
               The costs obtained in Section B  have been generalized  to fit this
        equation  by assuming that a straight line (on log -  log paper) between the
        "small" furnace  and the "large"  one is an  adequate representation of the
        conditions  in between.  For  most of the equipment types, this is a  good
        approximation.

               The calculations were made for the constant and exponent in the cost
        equation for three cases in each application area:

               (1)    Collector Only

               (2)    Total Equipment

               (3)    Total Installed Cost (new plant basis)

               The  "collector only" case  represents the  bare  piece of  control
        equipment; a wet scrubber, fabric filter or  precipitator, with no auxiliaries
        whatever. It is usually impossible to use such a piece of equipment without the
        installation of auxiliaries such as fans, pumps, dust handling conveyor, etc.

               The cost of the  "total equipment" includes  the collector and  those
        items specified as auxiliaries in the descriptions written in Section B. It does
        not include such things as foundations, ductwork, etc.

               The "total  installed cost" or turnkey  cost  represents the  price a
        contractor  would  ordinarily  charge for  a  complete  installation,  with all
        incidentals  such  as  start  up  supervision  included.  For  this study, the
        "grass—roots" cost was used. This  represents the cost  which is associated with
        installation of   equipment  without  the  space   limitations  and  possible
        interferences with installation that are characteristic of back-fit of equipment
        into an existing plant.

               This is not because the back-fit problems are less important than the air
        pollution  problems in existing plants. The choice was made only because of the
        difficulty  in setting meaningful ground rules as to how difficult a  situation
        should  be  assumed  in   the  back-fit  or  "add-on"  quotes. Some of the
        manufacturers quoted no  difference between the grass  roots and add-on
        installations.  Others  assumed  a  significant  problem with  "shoe horning"
        equipment into an existing plant.

               In general, the cost of add-on installations will  exceed those for the
        same equipment in  a new  plant.  Differences of  20% additional for add-on

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE,  INC
       installations over the grass roots case are typical.

              The calculated values for  use  in  the  cost equation are given in the
       following tables:
                  Table 62
                  Table 63

                  Table 66

                  Table 68

                  Table 70

                  Table 72

                  Table 74
Rotary Lime Kilns


Brass/Bronze Reverberatory Furnaces

Lead Cupolas

Sweating Furnaces

Lead Reverberatory Furnaces

Aluminum Chlorination Stations
              The rate  of increase of cost with size is lower than generally assumed
       for capital equipment. That is, while most installations are assumed to increase
       in cost with the 0.6 power of size, the equipment covered here usually followed
       a lower  "power  rule". This  was particularly  true  for the  electrostatic
       precipitators.  These  are applied to lime  kilns at the  lower  end of  their
       economical size range. Reducing the size of a very small precipitator does not
       appear to reduce the cost much.

              The exception to the generalization about low exponents are the wet
       scrubbers. These are simple when built on a very small scale, and become more
       complex as they get larger. These have an exponent of about 0.8 for the rotary
       lime kiln scrubber. However, the total installed costs fit the generalization well.

              One index often used in making budgetary estimates is the ratio of total
       equipment cost to collector cost, or of turnkey cost to collector cost. These
       ratios are helpful because of the ease with which "collector only" costs can be
       estimated, and the difficulty in obtaining good estimates of the turnkey cost.
       For each of the tables listed, these ratios have been calculated and tabulated.

                                  COSTS PER  CFM

              Costs  of  equipment and installation are often quoted as a number of
       dollars per CFM. For electrical precipitators and fabric filters, it is customary
       for  the manufacturers to use the ACFM at the collector inlet as the basis for

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING   INSTITUTE,  INC
       this index, while wet scrubber manufacturers use the saturated ACFM at the
       scrubber outlet.

              In order  to put this figure into a consistent form for comparison of the
       costs,  the cost/SCFM has been used in this section. The ratios quoted can be
       converted to an ACFM basis by multiplying $/ACFM = ($/SCFM) (530/T +
       460) where  T  is the gas  temperature  in degrees F at the collector  inlet.
       Scrubber manufacturers should be given the gas conditions (including moisture
       content) at the scrubber inlet when they are asked for price information. They
       will calculate the wet gas volume at the scrubber  outlet to  use in sizing the
       scrubber.

              The cost/SCFM  ratios for the application areas covered in this report
       are given in the following tables:
                  Table 64
                  Table 65

                  Table 67

                  Table 69

                  Table 71

                  Table 73

                  Table 75
Rotary Lime Kilns


Brass/Bronze Reverberatory Furnaces

Lead Cupolas

Sweating Furnaces

Lead Reverberatory Furnaces

Aluminum Chlorination Stations

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS  CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC.
                                   Table 62
                    Derived Cost Indicies for Rotary  Lime  Kilns
                                  (Precipitator)
COLLECTOR TYPE
ELECTROSTATIC PRECIP.
HIGH EFFICIENCY
COLLECTOR ONLY(A)
TOTAL EQUIPMENT(B)
TURNKEY(C)
SMALL C 24500 ACFM)
MEDIUMC 59500 ACFM)
LARGE C 105000 ACFM)
ELECTROSTATIC PRECI.P
LA-PROCESS WEIGHT
COLLECTOR ONLYCA)
TOTAL EQUIPMENT(B)
TURNKEY(C)
SMALL ( 24500 ACFM)
MEDIUMC 59500 ACFM)
LARGE (105000 ACFM)
K"
16501
20577
26138
-
7393
12257
14978
-
X"
.29*1
.395
.437
-
.398
.462
.514
-
P. /A **
-
2.028
2.286
2.332
-
2.250
2.430
2.456
C/A**
-
3.155
3.660
3.846
_
3.5^6
3.995
4.165
C/[i**
-
1.556
1.601
1.649
.
1.576
1.644
1.696
        *   For use in equation   COST = K  • (SIZE, ton/day)*
       **   B/A == Cost of total equipment/cost of collector only
           C/A = Turnkey cost/Cost of collector only
           C/B = Turnkey cost/Cost of total equipment

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE,  INC.
                                   Table 63
                    Derived Cost Indicies for Rotary Lime Kilns
                         (Fabric Collector and Scrubber)
COLLECTOR TYPE
FABRIC COLLECTOR
HIGH EFFICIENCY
COLLECTOR ONLY(A)
TOTAL EQUIPMENT(B)
TURNKEY(C)
SMALL ( 20000 ACFM)
MEDIUMC 50000 ACFM)
LARGE ( 90000 ACFM)
WET SCRUBBER
HIGH EFFICIENCY
COLLECTOR ONLY(A)
TOTAL EQUIPMENT(B)
TURNKEY(C)
SMALL C 35000 ACFM)
MEDIUMC 85000 ACFM)
LARGE (150000 ACFM)
WET SCRUBBER
LA-PROCESS WEIGHT
COLLECTOR ONLY(A)
TOTAL EQUIPMENT(B)
TURNKEYCO
SMALL C 35000 ACFM)
MEDIUMC 85000 ACFM)
LARGE (150000 ACFM)
K"
4760
10131
20016
-
270
837
• 5977
-
115
267
5158
-
X-"
.500
.463
.444
-
.022
.691
.517
-
.856
.872
.557
-
B/A ""
-
1.7«3
1.738
1.695
-
1.647
1.488
1.374
-
2.507
2.280
2.564
C/A""
-
3.206
3.062
2.966
-
5.066
4.058
3.318
-
10.549
8.364
6.966
/* i p •• «•
L/ ()•»«»
-
1.798
1.762
1.750
-
3.076
2.727
2.415
-
4.208
3.668
2.717
          For use in equation   COST = K •  (SIZE, ton/day)*
          B/A = Cost of total equipment/Cost of collector only
          C/A = Turnkey cost/Cost of collector only
          C/B = Turnkey cost/Cost of total equipment

-------
INDUSTRIAL  GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC
                            Table 64
                 Cost per SCFM* for Rotary Lime Kilns
COLLECTOR TYPE
ELECTROSTATIC PRECIP.
HIGH EFFICIENCY
GAS FLOW, SCFM
COLLECTOR ONLY
TOTAL EQUIPMENT
TURNKEY""
ELECTROSTATIC PRECIP
LA-PROCESS V.'EIGHT
GAS FLOW, SCFM
COLLECTOR ONLY
TOTAL EQUIPMENT
TURNKEY «»
SMALL


11194
6.09
12.35
19.22


11191*
^1. 52
10.17
16.03
MEDIUM


27185
2.92
6.68
10.69


27185
2.38
5.78
9.49
LARGE


47974
2.14
4.98
8.22


47974
1.83
4.50
7.63
 ;BASED ON SCFM CAT YOF, INCLUDING M20) AT COLLECTOR INLET
 :FOR GRASS ROOTS INSTALLATION

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING  INSTITUTE, INC.
                            Table 65
                 Cost per SCFM* for Rotary Lime Kilns
COLLECTOR TYPE
FABRIC COLLECTOR
HIGH EFFICIENCY
GAS FLOW, SCFM
COLLECTOR ONLY
TOTAL EQUIPMENT
TURNKEY s»!
WET SCRU3BER
HIGH EFFICIENCY
GAS FLOW, SCFM
COLLECTOR ONLY
TOTAL EQUIPMENT
TURNKEY !CX
WET SCRUBBER
LA-PROCESS WEIGHT
GAS FLOW, SCFM
COLLECTOR ONLY
TOTAL EQUIPMENT
TURNKEY'"!
SMALL


10495
5.07
9.05
16.27


11175
1.28
2.11
6.48


11175
.64
1.62
6.80
MEDIUM


26238
2.87
4.98
8.78


27139
.95
1.41
3.86


27139
.48
1.10
4.04
LARGE


47228
2.26
3.82
6.69


47892
.93
1. 28
3.10


47892
.49
1.26
3.43
 :BASED ON SCFM (AT 70F, INCLUDING H20) AT COLLECTOR INLET
 :FOR GRASS ROOTS INSTALLATION

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS  CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC
                                   Table 66
            Derived Cost Indicies for Brass/Bronze Reverberatory Furnaces
COLLECTOR TYPE
FABRIC COLLECTOR
HIGH EFFICIENCY
COLLECTOR ONLY(A)
TOTAL EQUIPMENT(B)
TURNKEY(C)
SMALL C 2200 ACFM)
MEDIUMC 5500 ACFM)
LARGE C «250 ACFM)
WET SCRUBBER
HIGH EFFICIENCY
COLLECTOR ONLY(A)
TOTAL EQUIPMENT(B)
TURNKEY(C)
SMALL C 3320 ACFM)
MEDIUMC 0150 ACFM)
LARGE C 12200 ACFM)
WET SCRUBBER
LA-PROCESS WEIGHT
COLLECTOR ONLY(A)
TOTAL EQUIPMENT(B)
TURNKEY(C)

SMALL C 3320 ACFM)
MEDIUMC H150 ACFM)
LARGE C 12200 ACFM)
K»


2969
6094
130«5
_
-



614
7792
25164
_
-



567
5491
50475

-
-
"
X-


, .431
.460
.419
_
-



.712
.424
.426
_
-



.728
.449
.101

-
- •
"
3/A""


-
-
—
2.236
2.199
-2.327


- .
-
—
5.362
3.537
3.598


-
-
-

4.193
3.257
2.845
C/A::::


-.
-
—
4.255
4.190
4.186


-
: -
—
17.389
11.403
11.691


-
-
-

13.5«6
10.568
5.691
C/B"5


-
-
—
1.903
1.905
1.799


-
1 -
i
3.243
3.246
,3.250
i

1 -
-
—
i
3.240
3.244
2.000
           For use in equation   COST = K  - (SIZE, ton/day)x
           B/A = Cost of total equipment/Cost of collector only
           C/A = Turnkey cost/Cost of collector only
           C/B = Turnkey cost/Cost of total equipment

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC.
                            Table 67

           Cost per SCFM* for Brass/Bronze Reverberatory Furnaces
COLLECTOR TYPE
FABRIC COLLECTOR
HIGH EFFICIENCY
GAS FLOW, SCFM
COLLECTOR ONLY
TOTAL EQUIPMENT
TURNKEY""
WET SCRUBBER
HIGH EFFICIENCY
GAS FLOW, SCFM
COLLECTOR ONLY
TOTAL EQUIPMENT
TURNKEY^"
WET SCRUBBER
LA-PROCESS WEIGHT
GAS FLOW, SCFM
COLLECTOR ONLY
TOTAL EQUIPMENT
TURNKEY •""
SMALL


1597
6.76
15.12
28.77

715
7.24
33.83
125.93

715
7.03
29.45
95.44
MEDIUM


3993
3.87
8.52
16.23

1756
20 ill
65.27

1756
5.63
18.35
59.52
LARGE


5990
3.28
7.63
13.72

2628
5.29
19.03
61.83

2628
5.25
14.93
29.87
 'BASED ON  SCFM  (AT 70F,  INCLUDING H20) AT COLLECTOR  INLET
 !FOR GRASS  ROOTS  INSTALLATION

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING   INSTITUTE,  INC.
                                  Table 68
                     Derived Cost Indicies for Lead Cupolas
COLLECTOR TYPE
FABRIC COLLECTOR
HIGH EFFICIENCY
COLLECTOR ONLY(A)
TOTAL EQUIPMENTCB)
TURNKEY(C)
SMALL C 5000 ACFM)
MEDIUMC 10000 ACFM)
LARGE ( 20000 ACFM)
WET SCRUBBER
HIGH EFFECIENCY
COLLECTOR ONLY(A)
TOTAL EQUIPMENT(B)
TURNKEY(C) .
SMALL C 3675 ACFM)
MEDIUMC 7350 ACFM)
LARGE ( 14700 ACFM)
WET SCRUBBER
LA-PROCESS WEIGHT
COLLECTOR ONLY(A)
TOTAL EQUIPMENT(B)
lURNKEY(C)
SMALL C 3675 ACFM)
MEDIUMC 7350 ACFM)
LARGE C 14700 ACFM)
K"
3437
5136
. 9046
-
52«
12109
39460
-
502
7197
23455
-
X-
.512
.4«2 .
• .'1Kb
-
.70h
.320
.319
-
.706
.404
.403
-
R/A"X
-
1.387
1.400
1.329
-
B.7B5
6.905
5.064
- -
6.774
5.930
4.405
C/A""
-
2.4S3
2.531
2.401
-
2«.b«y
22.607
16.46^
-
22.U16
19.239
14.291
. «» \f
' C/B""
I
: 1.790
l.«0tt
1.B07
-
, 3.25^4
3.286
^.252
-
3.250
3.244
3.245
           For use in equation   COST = K •  (SIZE, ton/day)x
           B/A = Cost of total equipment/Cost of collector only
           C/A = Turnkey cost/Cost of collector only
           C/B = Turnkey cost/Cost of total equipment

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC.
                            Table 69
                   Cost per SCFM* for Lead Cupolas
COLLECTOR TYPE
FABRIC COLLECTOR
HIGH EFFICIENCY
GAS FLOW, SCFM
COLLECTOR ONLY
TOTAL EQUIPMENT
TURNKEY "'!
WET SCRUBBER
HIGH EFFECIENCY
GAS FLOW, SCFM
COLLECTOR ONLY
TOTAL EQUIPMENT
TURNKEY"'"
WET SCRUBBER
LA-PROCESS WEIGHT
GAS FLOW, SCFM
COLLECTOR ONLY
TOTAL EQUIPMENT
TURNKEY'S "
SMALL


3630
3.38
4.68
8.38


2029
1.50
13.21
42.98


2029
1.43
9.68
31.47
MEDIUM


7260
2.32
3.24
5.86


4058
1.04
7.18
23.59


4058
.99
5.88
19.06
LARGE


14521
1.75
2.33
4.21


8116
1.03
5.21
16.94


8116
.98
4.31
13.98
  CBASED ON SCFM. CAT 70F, INCLUDING H20)  AT  COLLECTOR  INLET
  !FOR GRASS ROOTS INSTALLATION

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING   INSTITUTE,  INC.
                                  Table 70
                    Derived Cost Indicies for Sweating Furnaces
COLLECTOR TYPE
FABRIC COLLECTOR
HIGH EFFICIENCY .
COLLECTOR ONLY(A)
TOTAL EQUIPMENT(B)
TURNKEY(C)
SMALL ( 15400 ACFM)
MEDIUMC 30800 ACFM)
LARGE ( '16200 ACFM)

wET SCRUBBER
HIGH EFFICIENCY
COLLECTOR ONLY(A)
TOTAL EQUIPMENT(B)
TURNKEY(C)
SMALL ( 42500 ACFM)
MEDIUMC 85000 ACFM)
LARGE (127500 ACFM)
K«


1124
5006
. 9760
_
-
-



4133
6688
8497
«.
-
^
X"


.892
.948
.948
_
'-
-



.514
.768
.797
_
-
™ *
** **
B/A'"


-
-
-
5.253
ij.bia
5.586



-
-
-
3.^30
'4.819
4.535
** «»
C/A""


-
-
-
9.194
9.8^2
9.776



-
-
-
4.756
6.678
6.496
C/ffc"


-
-
-
1.750
l.YljU
1.7bu
i


-
-
-
,1.387
1.386
1.433
          For use in equation  COST = K  • (SIZE, ton/day)x
          B/A = Cost of total equipment/Cost of collector only
          C/A = Turnkey cost/Cost of collector only
          C/B = Turnkey cost/Cost of total equipment

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING  INSTITUTE, INC.
                            Table 71
                  Cost per SCFM* for Sweating Furnaces
COLLECTOR TYPE
FABRIC COLLECTOR
HIGH EFFICIENCY
GAS FLOW, SCFM
COLLECTOR ONLY
TOTAL EQUIPMENT
TURNKEY-"
WET SCRUBBER
HIGH EFFICIENCY
GAS FLOW, SCFM
COLLECTOR ONLY
TOTAL EQUIPMENT
TURNKEY*::
SMALL


X1196
1.36
7.16
12.5^


11492
1.64
5.63
7.80
MEDIUM


22992
1.21
6.80
11.91


22985
1.05
5.08
7.03
LARGE


34487
1.21
6.76
11.84


34477
.96
4.36
6.24
 "BASED  ON  SCFM  (AT 70F, INCLUDING H20) AT
 "FOR  GRASS  ROOTS  INSTALLATION
COLLECTOR INLET

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC.
                                   Table 72
                Derived Cost Indicies for Lead Reverberatory  Furnaces
COLLECTOR TYPE
FABRIC COLLECTOR
HIGH EFFICIENCY
COLLECTOR ONLYCA)
TOTAL EQUIPMENT(B)
TURNKEYCC)
SMALL C 5000 ACFM)
MEDIUMC 10000 ACFM)
LARGE ( 20000 ACFM)
WET SCRUBBER
HIGH EFFICIENCY
COLLECTOR ONLY(A)
TOTAL EQUIPMENT(B)
TURNKEY(C)
SMALL C 5000 ACFM)
MEDIUMC 11BOO ACFM)
LARGE C 23600 ACFM)
WET SCRUBBER
LA-PROCESS WEIGHT
COLLECTOR ONLY(A)
TOTAL EQUIPMENT(B)
TURNKEY(C)
SMALL C 5000 ACFM)
MEDIUMC 11800 ACFM)
LARGE C 23600 ACFM)
K"
1160
3931
. 6880
-
10794
49851
72815
-
7528
34273
66078
-
X"
.795
.816
.816
-
.119
.100
.088
-
.269
.330
.305
-
B/A!{"
-
3.557
3.734
3.680
-
4.415
4.493
4.279
-
5.236
5.487
5.773
C/A"-
-
6.226
6.536
6.440
-
5.275
6.352
5.965
-'
9.521
9.823
10.079
C/B::"
-
1.750
1.750
1.750
-
1.421
1.414
1.394
-
1.819
1.790
1.746
           For use in equation   COST = K •  (SIZE, ton/day)x
           B/A = Cost of total equipment/Cost of collector only
           C/A = Turnkey cost/Cost of collector only
           C/B -Turnkey cost/Cost of total equipment

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING  INSTITUTE, INC.
                              Table 73
               Cost per SCFM* for Lead Reverberatory Furnaces
COLLECTOR TYPE
FABRIC COLLECTOR.
HIGH EFFICIENCY
GAS FLOW, SCFM
COLLECTOR ONLY
TOTAL EQUIPMENT
TURNKEY55"
WET SCRUBBER
HIGH EFFICIENCY
GAS FLOW, SCFM
COLLECTOR ONLY
TOTAL EQUIPMENT
TURNKEY "•'
WET SCRUBBER
LA-PROCESS WEIGHT
GAS FLOW, SCFM
COLLECTOR ONLY
TOTAL EQUIPMENT
TURNKEY'"*
SMALL


3630
1.99
7.09
12.42


2760
5.14
22.71
32.28


2760
5.07
26.55
48.29
MEDIUM


7260
1.79
6.70
11.72


6515
2.18
9.79
13.85


6515
2.43
13.31
23.82
LARGE


14521
1.79
6.60
11.55


13029
1.32
5.65
7.87


13029
1.66
9.57
16.71
  -BASED ON SCFM CAT 70F, INCLUDING H20) AT COLLECTOR  INLET
  "FOR GRASS ROOTS INSTALLATION

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING    INSTITUTE,  INC
                                   Table 74
              Derived Cost Indicies for Aluminum Chlorination Stations
COLLECTOR TYPE
V/ET SCRUBBER
HIGH EFFICIENCY
COLLECTOR ONLY(A)
TOTAL EQUIPMENT(B)
TURNKEYCO
SMALL ( 4800 ACFM)
MEDIUMC 6000 ACFM)
LARGE ( 11200 ACFM)
WET SCRUBBER
LA-PROCESS WEIGHT
COLLECTOR ONLY(A)
TOTAL EQUIPMENT(B)
TURNKEYCO
SMALL C 4800 ACFM)
MEDIUMC 6000 ACFM)
LARGE C 11200 ACFM)
K"


7539
34332
66182
_
-
— *


7539
30047
60809
_
-
™
X"


.229
.280
.259
«
-

-------
INDUSTRIAL  GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC.
                             Table 75
                 Cost per SCFM* for Aluminum Chlorination
COLLECTOR TYPE
WET SCRUBBER
HIGH EFFICIENCY
GAS FLOW, SCFM
COLLECTOR ONLY
TOTAL EQUIPMENT
TURNKEY'?::
WET SCRUBBER
LA-PROCESS WEIGHT
GAS FLOW, SCFM
COLLECTOR ONLY
TOTAL EQUIPMENT
TURNKEY5'"
SMALL


1742
8.03
42.07
76.50
.

1742
8.03
36.73
70.02
MEDIUM


2178
7.25
39.81
71.26


2178
7.25
34.76
65.06
LARGE


4066
5.31
30.67
53.54


4066
5.31
26.74
48.87
  :BASED ON SCFM (AT 70F, INCLUDING H20) AT COLLECTOR INLET
  :FOR GRASS ROOTS INSTALLATION

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC.
             2.
DISCUSSION OF OPERATING  COSTS
             Several examples of cost calculations were made in Section B using the
      total annual cost of an air pollution control installation as the total of:

             (a)     Capital Charges (including depreciation, taxes and insurance)

             (b)     Utilities

             (c)     Maintenance Materials

             (d)     Maintenance Labor

             The first cost of equipment is often considered to the exclusion of the
      long term cost of owning  and operating a system. In order to  make a good
      estimate of the total  annual cost, each of the items listed must be considered.

             (a)     Capital Charges may be figured according to the normal practice
      of the user of the equipment. One method, used in Section B, is as follows. The
      total annual capital charge is the sum of

                    (1)     the  current interest rate on borrowed money, i.e. (say
                           10% per year)

                    (2)     the sinking fund depreciation charge,  S

                           s   =     	E/D	


                                          S  =  sinking fund depreciation
                                                charge, $/year

                                          P  =  initial cost, $

                                          i  =  interest rate (fraction)

                                          n  =  number of years life


                    (3)     an allowance for taxes and  insurance (say  3% per year)

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING   INSTITUTE,  INC.
             For  precipitators  and fabric collectors which are free of corrosion
      problems, the  most often quoted  life  for  the equipment  was 25  years.
      Scrubbers, on the other hand, were usually quoted at ten years expected life.

             (b)     Utilities Costs consist mainly of the costs of running  the fans
      that overcome  the  pressure loss  through the collector, plus minor costs for
      pump drives, solids handling equipment, and precipitator power  supply.

             In the case  of fabric  filters and scrubbers the utilities cost may be
      estimated on the basis of quoted  system horsepower as illustrated in Section B
      for the rotary lime kilns and lead/aluminum sweating furnaces.

             Fan  horsepower is set by the gas flow rate through the fan  and the
      pressure  loss. It may be approximated by:
                    BMP =
 Fx AP        (62.4
33,000 x E     V  12

  where:

BMP =  Brake horsepower

  F  - Flow, ACFM

 AP = Pressure loss, in wg

  E  = Fan Efficiency
             The horsepower requirement was quoted by the manufacturers of the
      equipment in Section B. Average figures are listed  for each application for the
      high efficiency case below:
             Rotary Lime Kiln
             Brass/Bronze Reverb.
             Lead Cupola
             Sweating Furnace
             Lead Reverb.
             Zinc Calcination Furnace
             Aluminum Chlor.
                                          ESP
               40.5
Fabric
Filter

150
 48
 34
100
 30
  Wet
Scrubber

140
 90
 98
450
150

100

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE,  INC
              These may be  scaled up or  down  in direct  ratio  to  the size of the
       installation for  estimating purposes.

              (c)     Maintenance  Materials  are   relatively  minor  for  electrical
       precipitators and are nominal for scrubbers.  The principal item in this category
       is  the  cost of  replacement  bags for fabric collectors. This item is  large  in
       comparison  to  all other  maintenance charges against the  collectors. It  is
       frequently quoted as the total maintenance charge for fabric filters.

              The maintenance charges for bag  replacement are a linear function  of
       the size of the installation,  while maintenance charges for other parts — fan
       wheels, for example —  should be more nearly proportional  to the square root
       of the size.

              The  aluminum  chlorination  station  alone  among the  applications
       covered here has a chemical consumption cost.  This  should  vary  with the
       amount of unreacted chlorine vented rather than with the furnace capacity.
       For a  rough estimate of chemical  costs,  all of the chlorine injected  may  be
       assumed  to  leave the furnace as HCI and react with caustic in the  scrubber
       according to:

                               HCI + NaOH -> NaCI + H20

              This reaction requires almost exactly one pound of caustic per pound
       of chlorine.

              (d)     Maintenance  Labor  is nominal for most air pollution control
       equipment.  Routine  cleaning  and  inspection  are  necessary  for  good
       performance of any type of equipment, and should not be overlooked for air
       pollution control systems. Scrubbers, in particular, require frequent inspection
       to determine that the nozzles are open and that no plugging or clogging of mist
       eliminators  has taken place.  Fan wheels  on fans  located downstream  of
       scrubbers require especially frequent attention.

              Fabric collectors require attention  to insure that the bags are intact and
       shaker or back blow mechanisms  functioning properly. While the manhour
       figure  is  not broken out in  most of the  estimates, 80 to 160 hours per year
       should be sufficient.  An  allowance of  1/2  hour  per bag  replacement  is
       adequate.

              Wet  scrubbers vary  in time  requirements from nearly "maintenance
       free"  in a lime  kiln application to "requiring frequent  inspection and cleaning"

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC.
      in aluminum chlorination. Maintenance involves frequently washing out the
      fans and connecting ductwork, washing out and inspecting the entrainment
      separator and body of the scrubber and inspecting piping, pumps and tanks for
      chloride corrosion. Requirements might run as high as 200-400 hours per year
      for the worst circumstances.

            Total of maintenance parts and labor was accumulated below by taking
      labor cost at $6.00/hr. where labor was broken out separately.
                             Cost  in Dollars per Year
             Rotary Lime Kiln
             Brass/Bronze Reverb.
             Lead Cupola
             Lead Alum. Sweat
             Lead Reverb.
             Aluminum Chlorination
                                         ESP
480
Fabric
Filter

18000
           7776
           4563
  Wet
Scrubber

5600
 600
 600
1728

6000
            The costs given here may be used as first approximations for planned
      equipment installations. The costs can vary greatly from one plant to another,
      and final equipment selection decisions should be based on estimated operating
      costs furnished by a competent manufacturer or engineer.

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS CLEANING    INSTITUTE, INC
             D.
INSTALLATION AND TEST DATA
             All of the IGCI member  companies were asked to participate in this
      program by summarizing  their past  installation data (since January 1, 1960).
      Also, any performance test  information  relating actual operation to design
      conditions was  requested. The forms used for this solicitation are shown  in
      Table 76. Detailed instructions for completing them are given in Appendix VI.

             Twelve of the member companies actually had installations to report.
      Of the  companies reporting installations, seven were most active in the rotary
      lime kiln area. The  remainder of the application areas were reported by only
      two or three companies in most cases.

             The returns  proved quite limited in another respect. For some of the
      application areas, relatively small, inexpensive fabric  filters have  been found
      acceptable. These devices generally perform at a high efficiency level (>99.5%)
      and produce a clear effluent. For this reason they are often installed without an
      efficiency  guarantee, and accepted  without  performance  tests.  In  this
      circumstance, little performance data is obtained. However, the compilation of
      the installation  and  test data does provide some interesting  insights into the
      pattern of application, the sizes of the units installed, etc.

             In each of the following sections, the data on the forms returned by the
      member companies  is abstracted  and discussed. The complete data contained
      on the forms is given in a table at the  end of each section.
             1.
ROTARY LIME KILNS
             More applications were reported for rotary lime kilns than for all the
      other application areas combined. Table  77 lists the  distribution of these
      applications by year and collector type. Table  78 gives the capacity of the
      installations in terms of the ACFM at the collector inlet. It was not possible to
      list these by kiln capacity (in ton/day lime production) because in most of the
      cases the kiln size was not known by the supplier of the air pollution control
      equipment. All of the installations and the test data reported are listed in Table
      82.

             For most  of the  applications,  no  test data was secured. There was
      usually a guaranteed or represented efficiency reported however, and the few
      test  results given  indicate  performance  at, or  slightly  better than,  the
      represented efficiency. In many cases there was no performance representation,
      or a relatively  conservative one in  terms of the known capability of the

-------
  N)
  s
           Table 76

           Sample

SUMMARY OF INSTALLATION DATA
                                                                     SOURCE:
                                                                                                  Page 1
(1)
TEST
NO.






(2)
CAP.
OF
UNIT






(3)
TYPE OF RAW 1
MATERIAL OR
CHARGE






(4)
FUEL2
USED






(5)
TYPE3
COLLECTOR






(Sa)
YEAR
PLACED
IN
SERVICE






(6)
GAS
VOLUME
ACFM






(7)
INLET
TEMP.
°F






(8a) (8b)
MEASURED
DUST LOADING
GR/ACF
INLET






OUTLET






(9)
DESIGN
EFF.
WT. %






(10)
IS4
PLUME
VISIBLE






1.  The composition of the raw material or charge should be presented on a wt.% basis.
2.  The type of fuel used in firing should be presented. Report sulfur and ash content of coal.
3.  Describe the type of collector. Examples: Venturi-30" w.  c.;Fabric Filter,  Orion BagsjESP, Area.
4.  Is the plume visible after collection? Answer yes  or no here.  If yes, an explanation as  to time

-------
                                                Table 76
                                                Sample

                                      SUMMARY OF INSTALLATION DATA
                                                                      SOURCE:
                                                                                                    Page 2
(1)
TEST
NO.





§
(11)
PARTICLE
SIZE
M.
<






>






WT.%
IN
RANGE






METHOD
OF
ANALYSIS






(12)
RESISTIVITY
OHM -CM
RESIST.






TEMP . F






METHOD.
OF
ANALYSIS






(13)
CHEMICAL
COMP. OF
PARTICLES
COMP .






WT.%






(14)
CHEMICAL
COMP. OF
GAS
COMP .






VOL.%






(15)
REMARKS
NOTE
5






5.  Remarks which might serve to clarify or enhance  the  value  of the reported data should be

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING    INSTITUTE,  INC.
                                   Table 77


                     Number of Rotary Lime Kiln  Installations

                           By Year Placed in Service
Year
1960
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
Total
Fabric
Filters
—
—
3
1
4
1
4
2
t
—
3
18
Wet
Scrubbers
2
—
1
2
1
9
5
4
2
2
7
35
ESP
—
—
—
—
—
—
2
2
—
1
5
Mechanical
3
1
—
2
2
3
2
5
2
1
—
21
Total
5
1
4
5
7
13
13
11
6
3
11
79*
       *IMOTE:  Table 82 lists 78 installations. Twin precipitators were counted
               as two installations here, but show as a single entry in Table 82.

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC.
                              Table 78



                Total Gas Volume from  Rotary  Lime Kilns



                         by Year of Installation



                          (thousands of AC FM)
Year
1960
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
Total
Fabric
Filters
—
—
171
83
200
115
560
190
—
—
379
1698
Wet
Scrubbers
101
—
65
96
37
389
265
213
155
296
416
2033
ESP
—
—
—
—
—
—
294
—
237
—
50
581
Mechanical
Collectors
160
91
—
35
56
103
72
289
73
36
—
915
Total
261
91
236
214
293
607
1191
692
465
332
845
5227

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS  CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC
                                 Table 79





                    Efficiency Representations Available From



                         Equipment Manufacturers for



                             Rotary Lime Kilns
Year
1960
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
Fabric
Filters
—
—
99+
99+
99.5
—
—
99+
—
—
99.5
Wet
Scrubbers
—
—
95
99
99
99
99
99.3
99-99.9
99.6
99-99.6
ESP
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
99.7
—
99.8
Mech-
anicals
—
88
—
—
—
—
96
96
—
—
—

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE,  INC
      equipment type.  For  this  reason,  neither  the  average  efficiency  levels
      represented or the average performance test results are tabulated.  However, a
      meaningful  pattern becomes apparent when the highest efficiency levels for
      which  equipment was  being designed are considered.  Table 79  lists these
      efficiencies for each type of equipment for each year covered by this study.

             There  has been little change in the level of efficiency quoted for fabric
      collectors since  1960. They are most frequently quoted  as "99 plus" percent
      efficient, with the tacit understanding that the efficiency should  be close to
      100%  if the bags are intact. Occasionally the  representation is  changed to
      99.5%, but this does not represent a change in design or expected performance.
      No tests were run to substantiate the high efficiency of fabric collectors in lime
      kiln service, but whenever observations of the effluent were made, it  was
      reported to be  clear. This indicates an effluent grain loading less than 0.03
      gr/ACF or 0.05 gr/SCF.

             There  has been  a relatively flat trend  in usage of fabric collectors for
      lime kilns over the 10 year period.
             Wet scrubbers  have accounted for more installations than any other
      type of collector, and  nearly as many as all the  others combined. The number
      of installations has  increased steadily from year  to year with the exception of
      1968 and 1969. During these years, little equipment of any kind was installed.

             A pattern of efficiency representations  apparently started to form in
      1960 or 1961. This resulted in scrubber installations with a nominal guaranteed
      efficiency of 95% in  1962. The efficiency representation  increased to 99% in
      1963 and 1964, and has risen to about 99.6% for recent installations. Test data
      substantiates the high  efficiencies represented. Frequently the scrubber outlet
      grain loading is represented rather than an efficiency.  An outlet loading "less
      than 0.05 gr/SCF"  is typical. This is a more meaningful representation than the
      collection  efficiency   but  requires a  knowledge  of the dust  loadings and
      properties  of the  dust  which  may  not be  available to the manufacturer.
      Frequently such representations are based on pilot unit operation or experience
      with similar installations.

             Several  additional  comments are in order with respect  to reported
      scrubber  efficiency.  Scrubbers,  like  mechanical  collectors, are  inherently
      size-selective. They  capture large particles more easily than small ones. For this
      reason, the inclusion  of a  mechanical separator, such  as a cyclone or settling
      chamber, in the process ahead of the scrubber will  reduce the "efficiency" of
      the scrubber even though  the  performance of the system may  be improved.

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE,  INC.
       Some of the scrubbers reported in this study had mechanical separation devices
       ahead of them to reduce the particulate loading, so efficiencies reported are not
       directly comparable.

              Another qualification peculiar to the scrubber performance reported
       involves the formation of a  steam plume. The gases enter the scrubber at a
       relatively high temperature. They  leave at the saturation temperature which is
       typically between 140 and 170°F, with a high concentration of water vapor.
       This condenses upon mixing with ambient air to form a steam plume. The
       steam plume is opaque and may mask a particulate load which would otherwise
       be visible.  The masking effect persists  for a short distance as the plume is
       dispersed into the atmosphere, and  hidden particulate matter may become
       visible  as  the water plume dissipates.  The companies  reporting  scrubber
       applications described the plume as  "visible" if  there  was an  appearance of
       particulate  solid after dissipation of the steam plume. For most of the scrubber
       installations there was no visible particulate solid  but there was a dense steam
       plume.

              Electrostatic precipitators  have been applied to  lime kilns to a  limited
       extent. Only four applications are  listed for this period. There is no real  pattern
       of efficiency  representations, but it appears that the precipitators have been
       offered  for either 99.7%  efficiency  or  less than 0.05  gr/ACF. The  average
       precipitator handled almost twice  as much gas as the average scrubber or filter,
       even though the kiln sizes were comparable.

              Mechanical collectors were not considered to be satisfactory devices for
       lime kilns except  in combination with other units. However, 21 installations of
       mechanical  collectors were  reported  over the  10 year period.  These were
       generally used for smaller gas flows than any of the other equipment types, and
       they were generally operated  at a higher temperature.

              Most frequently  the mechanical collectors were  sold on  the basis of an
       "efficiency  curve" which related expected efficiency to the particle size range
       for the dust.  No explicit efficiency  was represented.  For a  few cases  the
       efficiency  was established  in absolute  terms,   with  96% as  the  highest
       represented.

              The application  of mechanical collectors apparently reached  a peak
       around 1967 and declined subsequently.

              Several tests were run  to  substantiate performance of the  mechanical
       collectors. From this data, the gas composition and dust properties are listed in

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS  CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC
      Table 80. One complete precipitator test furnished the dust resistivity listed in
      Table 81.
             Table 82 contains a complete listing of the rotary lime kiln installation
      data.

-------
               Table 80
 Properties of Rotary Lime Kiln Dusts

   From Mechanical Collector Tests
(All Analyses for Particle Size by Bahco)
Test No.
Grains/ACF
Particle Size
> 40 y
< 40 > 30
< 30 > 20
< 20 > 10
< 10 > 5
< 5
Temp., °F
ACFM
Gas Comp,
Mol %
o2
09
c62
H20
Specific
Gravity
Fuel Used
Collection
Efficiency
AP in wg
26
7.60
40.0
5.9
7.6
17.5
14.0
15.0
827
90843


2.77
NA
88
5.0
6
5.34
47.0
6.0
7.0
15.0
9.0
16.0
831
91718

67.1
7.5
18.6
6.8
2.74
NA
82
5.0
22
0.94
89.4
1.4
1.9
2.3
1.6
3.4
650
25000

58.3
5.1
14.4
22.2
NA
NA
97.0
5.3
33
0.64
89.4
1.4
1.9
2.3
1.6
3.4
650
25000

58.5
5.1
14.4
22.0
2.9
CO
Gas
97.5
2.6
35
2.17
19.5
8.5
14.0
23.8
16.2
18.0
440
52800

72.9
14.8
7.9
4.4
3.02-3.08
CO
Gas
92.23
13
35
2.40
23.2
8.8
13.0
19.0
15.0
21.0
440
52800

—
3.02-3.08
CO
Gas
93.87
13
41
0.646
16.5
5.5
11.5
29.5
22.0
15.0
395
69600

59.0
10.2
9.4
21.4
2.72
Nat.
Gas
96.86
—
63
—
63.5
5.5
7.0
9.0
6.0
9.0
722
42511

65.4
11.9
12.3
10.4
2.73
NA
95

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING    INSTITUTE, INC.
                                    Table 81


                           Electrical  Resistivity of Dust

                         From 50 T/D Rotary Lime Kiln
               Inlet Conditions

                    Temp.,°F
                    Flow, ACFM
                    Loading gr/ACF
                    Fuel

               Particle Size Distribution by Bahco,
                    < 40
                    < 20
                    < 10
                    <  5
    20
    10
     5
     3
y
y
y
y
               Resistivity, ohm - cm

                 at 15% Moisture
                     in Gas
               160
               230
               270
               380
               450
  R

2.4 x 10 7
7  x 108
3.4 x 10 9
2.3 x 10 11
4.6 x 10 11
                       530
                     235,000
                     % 3.0
                    Natl. Gas
23
24
17
 7
                at 25% Moisture
                     in Gas
        140
        220
        270
        300
        370
        420
        450
    R

  5.8 x 10 7
  5.6 x 10 9
  3.7 x 10 10
  6   x1010
  1.9x 10"
  2.2x1011
  1.0x 1011

-------
     NO
     O
                          Table 82
Summary of Installation and Test Data for Rotary Lime Kilns
(1)
TEST
NO.



I


2


3

4

5


6

(2)
CAP.
OF
UNIT

T/D
NA


NA


NA

200

148


768

(3)
TYPE OF RAW
MATERIAL OR
CHARGE


Limestone


Limestone and
Dolomite

Limestone

Limestone

Limestone


Dolomite

(4)
FUEL
USED



NA**

Coal
and
Oil

NA

NA

NA


NA

(5)
TYPE
COLLECTOR



Cyclone
2.3"wg

Cyclone
L.7-3.3"wg

Cyclone
2.2-3.1"w
Dynamic **
Scrubber
Dynamic
Scrubber

Cyclone

(5a)
YEAR
PLACED
IN
SERVICE

1960


1960


1960
g
* 1960

1960


1961

(6)
GAS
VOLUME
ACFM


20,200


120,000


20,000

50,700
(NA)*
50,700
(NA)

90.843
91.718
(7)
INLET
TEMP.
°F


750


600


750
400
900
(NA)*
900
(NA)

827
831
(8a) (8b)
MEASURED
DUST LOADING
gr /ACF

INLET
NA


5.0


NA

2.81-
2.89
2.37-
2.84

7.60
5.34
OUTLET
NA


NA


NA

0.071-
0.08
0.052-
0.058

1.00
1.04
(9)
DESIGN
EFF.
WT. %


F.E.
Curve

F.E.
Curve

F.E.
Curve

0.2
gr/ACF
0.2
gr/ACF
ACT.
88
82
(10)
IS
PLUME
VISIBLE


NA


NA


NA

NO

NO


YES

  *For wet scrubbers, the second flow and temperature at saturation conditions.
 **NA — Is used where data is either "not available" or "not applicable".

-------
                  Table 82 - continued




Summary of Installation and Test Data for Rotary Lime Kilns
(1)
TEST
NO.
7
8
9
10
11
12
(2)
CAP.
OF
UNIT
T/D
NA
225
NA
NA
500
NA
(3)
TYPE OF RAW
MATERIAL OR
CHARGE
Limestone
Limestone
Limestone
Limestone
Limestone
Limestone
(4)
FUEL
USED
Nat'l
Gas
Gas
NA
NA
Coal
Nat'l.
Gas
(5)
TYPE
COLLECTOR
Dynamic
Scrubber
Fabric
Filter
Fabric
Filter
Fabric
Filter
Fabric
Filter
Dynamic
Scrubber
(5a)
YEAR
PLACED
IN
SERVICE
1962
1962
1962
1962
1963
1963
(6)
GAS
VOLUME
ACFM
65,000
(37,000
21,300
75,000
75,000
83,200
66,000
(32,500]
(7)
INLET
TEMP.
°F
1,300
(170)
495
550
550
550
1,440
-(171)
(8a) (8b)
MEASURED
DUST LOADING
gr/ACF
INLET
NA
10.0
NA
1.45
4-8
4.0
(Custo-
mer)
OUTLET
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(9)
DESIGN
EFF.
WT. %
95
99+
99+
99+
99+
0.1
gr/ACF
(10)
IS
PLUME
VISIBLE
NO
NO
NO
NA
NA

-------
ro
10
                  Table 82 — continued

Summary of  Installation and Test Data for Rotary  Lime Kilns
(1)
TEST
NO.
13
14
15
16
17
18
(2)
CAP.
OF
UNIT
T/D
NA
NA
NA
NA
125
125
(3)
TYPE OF RAW
MATERIAL OR
CHARGE
Limestone
Limestone
NA
NA
Limestone
Limestone
(4)
FUEL
USED
NA
NA
Gas
NA
Gas
Gas
(5)
TYPE
COLLECTOR
Cyclone
Scrubber
8"wg
Cyclone
Scrubber
8"wg
Fabric
Filter
Fabric
Filter
(5a)
YEAR
PLACED
IN
SERVICE
1963
1963
1963
1964
1964
1964
(6)
GAS
VOLUME
ACFM
20,000
30,000
(NA)
15,000
37,000
(NA)
16,000
16,000
(7)
INLET
TEMP.
°F
600
400
(NA)
NA
500
(NA)
550
550
(8a) (8b)
MEASURED
DUST LOADING
gr/ACF
INLET
NA
8
NA
3
3.8 .
3.8
OUTLET
NA
0.036
NA
0.15
NA
NA
(9)
DESIGN
EFF.
WT. %
F.E.
Curve
99
NA
99
99+
99+
(10)
IS
PLUME
VISIBLE
NA
NA
YES
NA
NA

-------
                                                            Table 82  — continued




                                          Summary of  Installation and  Test  Data for Rotary  Lime Kilns
(1)
TEST
NO.
19
20
21
22
23
24
(2)
CAP.
OF
UNIT
T/D
600
NA
NA
240
NA
NA
(3)
TYPE OF RAW
MATERIAL OR
CHARGE
Limestone
Limestone
Limestone
Limestone
NA
NA
(4)
FUEL
USED
NA
Coal
NA
NA
NA
NA
(5)
TYPE
COLLECTOR
Fabric -
Fiberglas
Reverse
Air
Fabric
Filter
Cyclone
Cyclone
2.6 -
2.7"wg
Scrubber
Jcrubber
(5a)
YEAR
PLACED
IN
SERVICE
s, 1964
1964
1964
1964
1965
1965
(6)
GAS
VOLUME
ACFM
140,000
28,000
25,000
30,600
30,750
40,000
(NA)
100,000
(NA)
(7)
INLET
TEMP.
°F
550
550
900
650
640
500
(NA)
600
(NA)
(8a) (8b)
MEASURED
DUST LOADING
gr/ACF
INLET
NA
0.8
NA
0.94
0.64
NA
NA
OUTLET
NA
NA
NA
0.032
0.018
0.39
0.05
(9)
DESIGN
EFF.
WT. %
NA
99.5
F.E.
Curve
(ACT)
97.0
97.5
NA
NA
(10)
IS
PLUME
VISIBLE
NO
NA
NA
YES
NA
NA

-------
to
                  Table 82 — continued




Summary  of Installation and Test Data for Rotary Lime Kilns
(1)
TEST
NO.
25
26
27
28
29
30
(2)
CAP.
OF
UNIT
T/D
NA
500
NA
NA
NA
100
(3)
TYPE OF RAW
MATERIAL OR
CHARGE
NA
Limestone"
NA
NA
NA
Limestone
(4)
FUEL
USED
NA
Coal
NA
NA
NA
Nat'l.
Gas
(5)
TYPE
COLLECTOR
Scrubber
8"wg
Fabric-
;iberglass
Reverse
Air
Scrubber
8" wg
Scrubber
Scrubber
15" wg
Dynamic
Scrubber
(5a)
YEAR
PLACED
IN
SERVICE
1965
1965
1965
1965
1965
1965
(6)
GAS
VOLUME
ACFM
35,000
(NA)
115,000
52,000
(NA)
46,000
(NA)
29,400
(NA)
52,000
(30,000
(7)
INLET
TEMP.
°F
650
(NA)
550
400
(NA)
600
(NA)
450
(NA)
1,050
(150)
(8a) (8b)
MEASURED
DUST LOADING
gr/ACF
INLET
NA
7.6
NA
2.4
20
NA
OUTLET
0.05
gr/SCF
NA
NA
0.05
0.2
NA
(9)
DESIGN
EFF.
WT. %
99
NA
98.2
NA
99
NA
(10)
IS
PLUME
VISIBLE
NA
NO
NA
NA
NA

-------
                                                              Table 82 — continued

                                            Summary of Installation and Test Data for  Rotary Lime  Kilns
(1)
TEST
NO.



31

32


33



34



35

36

(2)
CAP.
OF
UNIT

T/D
140

NA


200



200



200

NA

(3)
TYPE OF RAW
MATERIAL OR
CHARGE


Limestone

NA


Limestone



Limestone



Limestone

NA

(4)
FUEL
USED



NA

Gas


CO
Gas


CO
Gas


CO
Gas
Nat'l.
Gas
(5)
TYPE
COLLECTOR



Dynamic
Scrubber
Dynamic
Scrubber

Cyclone
2.3-6.0"wg


Cyclone



Cyclone
13'Vg
Scrubber
15'Wg
(5a)
YEAR
PLACED
IN
SERVICE

1965

1965


1965



1965



1965

1966

(6)
GAS
VOLUME
ACFM


31,000
(22,300;

4,000
25,000
Nor .
40,000
Max.
25,000
Nor.
40,000
Max.

52,800

73,300
(NA)
(7)
INLET
TEMP.
°F


1.050


NA

650



650



440

450
(NA)
(8a) (8b)
MEASURED
DUST LOADING
gr/ACF

INLET
10


NA

1.5



1.5



2.17
2.40
20

OUTLET
0.045


NA

NA



NA



0.148
0.148
NA

(9)
DESIGN
EFF.
WT. 1


NA


NA
F.E.
Curve


F.E.
Curve


(ACT)
93.23
93.87
99.7

(10)
IS
PLUME
VISIBLE


NO


YES

NA



NA



YES

NA

to

-------
IS)
                                                            Table 82 - continued




                                          Summary of Installation and Test Data for Rotary Lime Kilns
(1)
TEST
NO.
37
38
39
40
41
42
(2)
CAP.
OF
UNIT
T/D
NA
NA
NA
NA
35
300
(3)
TYPE OF RAW
MATERIAL OR
CHARGE
NA
NA
NA
NA
Oyster Shells
Limestone
(4)
FUEL
USED
Nat'l.
Gas
Oil
Oil
Nat'l.
Gas
Methane
NA
(5)
TYPE
COLLECTOR
Scrubber
Scrubber
i •?"
i j Wg
Scrubber
15"wg
Scrubber
15" wg
ESP
ESP
(5a)
YEAR
PLACED
IN
SERVICE
1966
1966
1966
1966
1966
1966
(6)
GAS
VOLUME
ACFM
40,000
(NA)
62,000
(NA)
48,000
(NA)
42,900
(NA)
69,600
225,000
(7)
INLET
TEMP.
°f
500
(NA)
550
(NA)
550
(NA)
500
(NA)
395
500
(8a) (8b)
MEASURED
DUST LOADING
gr/ACF
INLET
15
20
20
20
0.646
0.8
OUTLET
0.3
0.1
0.08
0.1
0.0207
NA
(9)
DESIGN
EFF.
WT. %
NA
99.5
99.7
99.5
(ACT)
96.98
99.0
(10)
IS
PLUME
VISIBLE
NA
NA
NA
NA
YES

-------
                  Table 82 — continued




Summary of Installation and Test Data  for Rotary  Lime Kilns
(1)
TEST
NO.
43
44
45
46
47
48
(2)
CAP.
OF
UNIT
T/D
NA
NA
600
600
600
600
(3)
TYPE OF RAW
MATERIAL OR
CHARGE
Limestone
Sludge Lime
Limestone
Limestone
Limestone
Limestone
(4)
FUEL
USED
NA
NA
Coal
NA
NA
NA
(5)
TYPE
COLLECTOR
Cyclone
Cyclone
Fabric -
Fiberglass
Reverse
Air
Fabric -
Fiberglass
Reverse
Air
Fabric -
Fiberglass
Reverse
Air
Fabric -
Fiberglass
Reverse
Air
(5a)
YEAR
PLACED
IN
SERVICE
1966
1966
1966
9
, 1966
, 1966
, 1966
(6)
GAS
VOLUME
ACFM
36,000
37,000
36,400
140,000
140,000
140,000
140,000
(7)
INLET
TEMP.
°F
700
450
300
550
550
550
550
(8a) (8b)
MEASURED
DUST LOADING
gr/ACF
INLET
NA
1,280
#/Min.
NA
NA
NA
NA
OUTLET
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(9)
DESIGN
EFF.
WT. %
Curve
96
NA
NA
NA
NA
(10)
IS
PLUME
VISIBLE
NA
NA
NO
NO
NO

-------
M
00
                                                            Table 82 — continued

                                          Summary of Installation and Test Data for Rotary Lime  Kilns
(1)
TEST
NO.



49

50


51

52


53

54

(2)
CAP.
OF
UNIT
T/D

NA

NA


NA

NA


NA

NA

(3)
TYPE OF RAW
MATERIAL OR
CHARGE


NA

Limestone


Limestone

Limestone


Limestone

Limestone

(4)
FUEL
USED



Oil

NA


NA

NA


NA

NA

(5)
TYPE
COLLECTOR



Scrubber
10" wg
Cyclone
2.8"wg

Cyclone
2.2"wg
Cyclone
9.6"wg

Cyclone
2.5"wg
Cyclone
5.5"wg
(5a)
YEAR
PLACED
IN
SERVICE

1967

1967


1967

1967


1967

1967

(6)
GAS
VOLUME
ACFM


25,000

86,500


100,000

35,500


47,000

20,000

(7)
INLET
TEMP.
°F


450

600


700

300


600

600

(8a) (8b)
MEASURED
DUST LOADING
gr/ACF


INLET
5.3

5-12


NA

1,495
#/Min

NA

NA


OUTLET
0.05

NA


NA

NA


NA

NA

(9)
DESIGN
EFF.
WT. %


99

F.E.
Curve

F.E.
Curve

96.0

F.E.
Curve

F.E.
Curve

(10)
IS
PLUME
VISIBLE


NA

NA


NA

NA


NA

NA

-------
                                                             Table 82 - continued
                                           Summary of Installation and Test Data for Rotary Lime Kilns
(1)
TEST
NO.



55

56



57


58


59

60

(2)
CAP.
OF
UNIT

T/D
245

600



NA


NA


NA

NA

(3)
TYPE OF RAW
MATERIAL OR
CHARGE


Dolomite

Limestone



Limestone


Limestone


Limestone

Limestone

(4)
FUEL
USED



Gas

NA


Coal
High
S
Coal
High
S
Coal
High
S
Nat'l.
Gas
(5)
TYPE
COLLECTOR



Fabric
Filter
Fabric
Filter -
Glass;
Rev. Air

Dynamic
Scrubber

Dynamic
Scrubber

Dynamic
Scrubber
Dynamic
Scrubber
(5a)
YEAR
PLACED
IN
SERVICE

1967

1967



1967


1967


1967

1968

(6)
GAS
VOLUME
ACFM


50,000

140,000



62,500
(40,300

62,500
(40,300

62,500
(40,300;;
111,000
(54,100
(7)
INLET
TEMP.
°F


500

550



700
(154)

700
(154)

700
(154)
1,400
(165)
(8a) (8b)
MEASURED
DUST LOADING
gr/ACF

INLET
2.00

NA


4.24
2.83
2.22

NA


NA

10-20

OUTLET
NA

NA


0.0306
0.0319
0.0318

NA


NA

NA

(9)
DESIGN
EFF.
WT. %


99+

NA



99.0


NA


NA

99.0

(10)
IS
PLUME
VISIBLE


NO

NO



NO


NO


NO

NO

NJ

-------
N)
NJ
O
                  Table 82 — continued


Summary of Installation and Test Data  for Rotary  Lime Kilns
(1)
TEST
NO.



61


62



63

64
65
66

(2)
CAP.
OF
UNIT

T/D
NA


100*



NA

NA
NA
NA

(3)
TYPE OF RAW
MATERIAL OR
CHARGE


NA


Limestone



Limestone

NA
Limestone
NA

(4)
FUEL
USED



Oil

Nat ' 1 .
Gas
+
Coal

NA

Gas
NA
Gas

(5)
TYPE
COLLECTOR



Scrubber
20" Wg

ESP
(two units


Cyclone
3.0" Wg
Cyclone
Cyclone
Scrubber
50" Wg
(5a)
YEAR
PLACED
IN
SERVICE

1968


1968



1968

1968
1969
1969

(6)
GAS
VOLUME
ACFM


44,000
(NA)
**
236,920



42,511

30,000
35.850
110,000

(7)
INLET
TEMP.
°F


450
(NA)

530



722

NA
740
600

(8a) (8b)
MEASURED
DUST LOADING
gr/ACF

INLET
20

**
3.00



1.29

NA
NA
4.4

OUTLET
NA

**
0.0077



0.066

NA
NA
0.02

(9)
DESIGN
EFF.
WT. %


99.9

99.7
**
99.717
ACT
ACT
95.0

NA
F.E.
Curve
99.6

(10)
IS
PLUME
VISIBLE


NA


NO



YES

YES
NA
NA

-------
                                                            Table 82 — continued


                                         Summary of Installation and Test Data for Rotary Lime Kilns
(1)
TEST
NO.



67


68


69



70



71

72

(2)
CAP.
OF
UNIT

T/D
650


NA


NA



NA



NA

220

(3)
TYPE OF RAW
MATERIAL OR
CHARGE


Limestone


Limestone


Limestone



Limestone



Limestone

Limestone

(4)
FUEL
USED



Coal,
Low
S

Coal
Low
S
Coal
Low
S

Nat'l.
Gas

Coal
Low
S
Nat'l.
Gas
(5)
TYPE
COLLECTOR



Dynamic
Scrubber

Dynamic
Scrubber

Dynamic
Scrubber

Venturi
Scrubber
15-20 wg

Venturi
Scrubber
15-20" wg
Dynamic
Scrubber
(5a)
YEAR
PLACED
IN
SERVICE

1969


1970


1970



1970



1970

1970

(6)
GAS
VOLUME
ACFM


186,000
(98,500

63,800
(36,000

42,500
(24,600


16,500
(14,250


NA

45,000
(31,200
(7)
INLET
TEMP.
°F


1,100
(160)

950
(152)

950
(152)


430
(132)


NA

550
(136)
(8a) (8b)
MEASURED
DUST LOADING
gr/ACF

INLET
NA


NA


NA



NA



NA

NA

OUTLET
NA


NA


NA



0.023
0.0286
gr/SCF

NA

NA

(9)
DESIGN
EFF.
WT. %


15 gr/A(
in
0.05 gr/
out
0.05
gr/SCF

0.05
gr/SCF


99
on
2^ +

NA

NA

(10)
IS
PLUME
VISIBLE


F
NO
ACF

NO


NO



NO



NO

NO

NJ

-------
B
ro
                  Table 82 — continued




Summary of Installation and Test Data for Rotary Lime Kilns
(1)
TEST
NO.
73
74
75
76
77
78
(2)
CAP.
OF
UNIT
T/D
600
NA
250
NA
NA
NA
(3)
TYPE OF RAW
MATERIAL OR
CHARGE
Limestone
Limestone
- Limestone
Dolomite
Limestone
NA
(4)
FUEL
USED
30%
Coal
70%
Gas
Coal
Gas
Coal
NA
Gas
(5)
TYPE
COLLECTOR
Dynamic
Scrubber
Fabric
Filter
ESP
Fabric
Filter
Fabric
Filter
Scrubber
(Sa)
YEAR
PLACED
IN
SERVICE
1970
1970
1970
1970
1970
1970
(&)
GAS
VOLUME
ACFM
186,000
(97,000
110,000
50,000
255,000
44,000
62,40
(NA)
(7)
INLET
TEMP.
°F

1,150
(162)
570
550
600
550
525
(NA)
(8a) (8b)
MEASURED
DUST LOADING
gr/ACF
INLET
NA
1.83
12.0
2.85
0.52
NA
OUTLET
NA
NA
0.02
NA
NA
NA
(9)
DESIGN
EFF.
WT. %
99.6
99+
99.84
99.5
99.5
NA
(10)
IS
PLUME
VISIBLE
NO
NA
NO
NO
NA

-------
                                                           Table 82 — continued



                                         Summary of Installation and Test Data for Rotary  Lime Kilns
(1)
TEST
NO.



6










-
(11)
PARTICLE
SIZE
M_
<
45
40
35

30
25
20
15
10
5



>
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10 :
5 :




WT.%
IN
RANGE

37.5-44
2.5-2.8
2.0-3.0
3.9-3.C
3.1-3.0
4.5-4.C
6.6-5.S
0.9-9.1
4.0-9.0
5.0-16.



METHOD
OF
ANALYSIS

.2
BAHCO







0



(12)
RESISTIVITY
OHM -CM

RESIST.

NA











TEMP . F

NA










-
METHOD
OF
ANALYSIS


NA











(13)
CHEMICAL
COMP. OF
PARTICLES
COMP .

2.775 i
2.745 i










WT. %

NA











(14)
CHEMICAL
COMP. OF
GAS
COMP .
02
C02
N2

H20








VOL.%
7.5
18.6
67.1

6.8








(15)
REMARKS



Draft
Loss
5" wg










NJ
ro

-------
to
                                                            Table 82 - continued




                                         Summary of Installation and Test Data for  Rotary Lime  Kilns
(1)
TEST
NO.
35


41


(11)
PARTICLE
SIZE
M_
<
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
>
45
40
35
30
25
20
15 :
in
5 :
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
WT.%
IN
RANGE
16.5-20
3.0-3.2
4.2-3.4
4.3-5.4
6.0-5.0
8.0-8.0
0.0-8.9
3.8-10.
6.2-15.
8.0-21.
14.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
4.8
6.7
10.5
19.0
22.0
15.0
METHOD
OF
ANALYSIS
.0
BAHCO
1
0
0
BAHCO
•

(12)
RESISTIVITY
OHM -CM
RESIST.
NA


NA


TEMP . F
NA


NA


METHOD
OF
ANALYSIS
NA


NA


(13)
CHEMICAL
COMP. OF
PARTICLES
COMP .
3.02-
3.08 sg


2.72sg


WT.%






(14)
CHEMICAL
COMP. OF
GAS
COMP .
02
C02
N2
H20

02
C02
N?
H20

VOL.%
14.8
7.9
72.9
4.4

10.2
9.4
59.0
21.4

(15)
REMARKS






-------
                                                             Table  82 — continued


                                          Summary of Installation and Test Data for Rotary Lime  Kilns
(1)
TEST
NO.
22


33


(11)
PARTICLE
SIZE
*L
<
45
40
IS
30
25
20
15
10
5
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
>
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
WT.%
IN
RANGE
88.5
0.9
0.6
0.8
0.7
1.2
1.1
1.2
1.6
3.4
88.5
0.9
0.6
0.8
0.7
1.2
1.1
1.2
1.6
3.4
METHOD
OF
ANALYSIS
BAHCO


BAH CO


(12)
RESISTIVITY
OHM -CM
RESIST.
NA


NA


TEMP . F
NA


NA


METHOD
OF
ANALYSIS
NA


NA


(13)
CHEMICAL
COMP. OF
PARTICLES
COMP .



2.9 sg


WT.%






(14)
CHEMICAL
COMP. OF
GAS
COMP .
02
C02
No
H2°

02
C02
N2
H20

VOL.1
5.1
14.4
58.3
22.2

5.1
14.4
58.5
22.0

(15)
REMARKS






N)
N)

-------
ro
                                                             Table 82 - continued




                                           Summary  of Installation and Test Data for Rotary  Lime Kilns
(1)
TEST
NO.
57

60
62


(11)
PARTICLE
SIZE
M.
<
NA

20
11
40
20
10
5

>
NA

11
0
20
10
5
3

WT.%
IN
RANGE
NA

50
50
23
24
17
7

METHOD
OF
ANALYSIS
NA

By
Customer
Standard
Screens
Composite
9 Tests <

(12)
RESISTIVITY
OHM -CM
RESIST.
NA

NA
.4xl07
7 x 10*
.4xl09
.3x1011
TEMP . F
NA

NA
160
230
270
380
.6xlO-M 450
.8x107"
.6x109
.7xlQl(
fi vi n1 (
.9x1011
.2x1011
.OxlflU
150
220
270
Tfin
370
420
450
METHOD
OF
ANALYSIS
NA

NA
15%
Moisture


(13)
CHEMICAL
COMP. OF
PARTICLES
COMP .


CaCOs
CaO
NA


WT.%
NA

50
50
NA


(14)
CHEMICAL
COMP. OF
GAS
COMP .
02
C02
N2
H20

NA


VOL.1
0.7
24.3
59.7
15.3

NA


(15)
REMARKS






-------
                                                            Table 82 - continued



                                         Summary of Installation and Test Data for Rotary Lime Kilns
(1)
TEST
NO.



63










73



(ID
PARTICLE
SIZE
M.
<

45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5

25
10
4
1
-
>
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5

7^
10
4
1


WT.%
IN
RANGE

61.0
2.5
2.5
3.0
3.1
3.9
4.0
5.0
6.0
9.0
an. 2
10.8
4.3
2.9
1.8

METHOD
OF
ANALYSIS


BAHCO









Customer
Analysis


-
(12)
RESISTIVITY
OHM- CM

RESIST.

NA














TEMP . F

NA














METHOD
OF
ANALYSIS


NA














(13)
CHEMICAL
COMP. OF
PARTICLES
COMP .

2.73sg














WT.%
















(14)
CHEMICAL
COMP. OF
GAS
COMP .

°2
C02
N?
H20











VOL.%

11.9
12.3
65.4












(15)
REMARKS



















10

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE, INC
               2.      Brass/Bronze Reverberatory Furnaces

               A total of 16 applications of equipment was reported in this area. Of
        these, all but seven  were fabric collectors. These were ordinarily not sold for
        specified efficiency level, although several were represented to be 99.9 percent
        efficient. These ordinarily functioned well enough to provide a clear effluent
        and no efficiency tests were run. Orion  or Dacron bags were  used in all of the
        installations except  one  which had a 550°F operating temperature and  used
        glass bags.

               Two Venturi type scrubbers were installed. One was designed for 28"
        wg  and had a reported efficiency  of  99.32%  on a furnace charging  dross
        containing lead,  zinc and  soldering alloys. The other operated at 35" wg and
        showed  only 92.5% collection  efficiency. The  discrepancy  here  lies in  the
        loadings at the scrubber inlet, which was almost 10 times as high on the furnace
        for  which the 99+% efficiency was obtained. This is apparently due to the
        mechanical  entrainment  of large quantities of the dross which  carried over into
        the  scrubber. The two produced effluents of nearly equal grain loading (0.045
        and 0.039 gr/ACF)  with the higher pressure drop producing  the lower outlet
        grain loading. These values may be compared with the grain loading specified
        for  the  "high efficiency" case in Section B, which called for  0.01 gr/ACF on
        brass/bronze reverberatory furnaces for  good stack appearance. Both scrubbers
        were reported to operate with no visible plume other than the steam plume,
        however.

               Three dynamic scrubbers and one dynamic mechanical collector were
        also  installed. No performance specifications were reported for any of these,
        nor were any tests run to establish performance. One of the four was reported
        to produce a clear stack. The other  three were all reported to leave a visible
        paniculate plume in  addition to any plume due to water condensation.

               Two of the fabric collectors were reported to have visible plumes. One
        of these was due to failure of the cooling system which caused bag damage. The
        other fabric  collector installations were all reported to produce a clear effluent.

               All of the collected installation data are summarized in  Table 83.

-------
                                                                    Table 83



                                 Summary of Installation and Test Data for Brass/Bronze Reverberatory Furnaces
(1)
TEST
NO.
1
2
3
4


5

6

(2)
CAP.
OF
UNIT
T/n
20
30
10
20 T/D
(total
2 furn


72 T/I
Charge

NA

(3)
TYPE OF RAW
MATERIAL OR
CHARGE
Brass/Bronze
Scrap
Brass/Bronze
Scrap
Brass/Bronze
Scrap
Copper Scrap


) Copper Scrap

Copper Scrap

(4)
FUEL
USED
Oil
Gas
Oil
#5
Oil


NA

NA

(5)
TYPE
COLLECTOR
Dynamic
Scrubber
Dynamic
Scrubber
Dynamic
Scrubber
Fabric
Filter -
Orion,
Shaker
Fabric
Filter -
Dacron
Shaker
Fabric-
Glass,
Sonic §
Reverse Ai
(5a)
YEAR
PLACED
IN
SERVICE
1960
1960
1963
1965


1965

1965
r
(6)
GAS
VOLUME
ACFM
36,000
30,000
12,000
18,000


30,000

31,500

(7)
INLET
TEMP.
°F
NA
NA
NA
250


275

550

(8a) (8b)
MEASURED
DUST LOADING
gr/ACF
INLET
NA
NA
NA
NA


NA

NA

OUTLET
NA
NA
NA
NA


NA

NA

(9)
DESIGN
EFF.
WT. %
NA
NA
NA
NA


NA

NA

(10)
IS
PLUME
VISIBLE
YES
NO
YES
YES*


NO

NO

ro
N>

-------
NJ
CO
O
                            Table 83 - continued


Summary of  Installation and Test Data for Brass/Bronze  Reverberatory  Furnaces
(1)
TEST
NO.




7


8

9
10



11


12

(2)
CAP.
OF
UNIT

T/D

NA


50

5
75 to
100
T/D


NA




(3)
TYPE OF RAW
MATERIAL OR
CHARGE



NA


Brass/Bronze
Scrap
Brass/Bronze
Scrap
Scrap Radiators



NA


Zinc and Copper

(4)
FUEL
USED




NA


Gas

Oil
#5
Oil
or
Gas

NA


Oil

(5)
TYPE
COLLECTOR



Fabric -
Orion
Shaker
Type
Venturi
Scrubber
Dynamic
Mechanical
Fabric -
Acrylic,
Shaker
Fabric -
Dacron,
Shaker
Fabric -
Acrylic,
Shaker
(5a)
YEAR
PLACED
IN
SERVICE


1967


1967

1967
1968



1968


1968

(6)
GAS
VOLUME
ACFM



38,000


4,000

2,500
81,000



24,000


41,000

(7)
INLET
TEMP.
°F



250


306

NA
260



250


250

(8a) (8b)
MEASURED
DUST LOADING
gr/ACF

INLET

NA


NA

NA
NA



NA


0.01

OUTLET

NA


NA

NA
NA



NA


NA

(9)
DESIGN
EFF.
WT. %



NA


99.6

NA
99,9+



99.9+


99.9+

(10)
IS
PLUME
VISIBLE



YES


NO

YES
NO



NO


NO

-------
                                                           Table 83 — continued


                               Summary of Installation and Test Data for Brass/Bronze Reverberatory Furnaces
(1)
TEST
NO.
13
14
15
16


(2)
CAP.
OF
UNIT
T/D
NA
100
NA
10


(3)
TYPE OF RAW
MATERIAL OR
CHARGE
Dross
Containing
Lead, Zinc +
Soldering Alloy
Brass/Bronze
Scrap
NA
Brass Scrap

-
(4)
FUEL
USED
Gas
Gas
Oil g
Gas
Nat'l.
Gas


(5)
TYPE
COLLECTOR
Venturi
Scrubber
28"wg
Fabric
Filter
Fabric-
Orion
Shaker
Venturi
Scrubber
35"wg


(5a)
YEAR
PLACED
IN
SERVICE
1968
1969
1970
1970

-
(6)
GAS
VOLUME
ACFM
50,000
(30,000
10,000
53,000
15,000
(12,000


(7)
INLET
TEMP.
°F
340
(120)
250
250
1,200
)(160)


(8a) (8b)
MEASURED
DUST LOADING
/ACF
INLET
4
NA
NA
0.418


OUTLET
0.045
NA
NA
0.039


(9)
DESIGN
EFF.
WT. %
NA
99.9
99.9
ACT
92.5


(10)
IS
PLUME
VISIBLE
NO
NO
NA
NO


to

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC.
               3.
Lead Cupolas
               Four manufacturers reported a total of 11 installations in this area, as
        indicated in  Table  84. All  but one  were  fabric collectors.  These were
        represented to be 99.85% efficient, 99.9+% efficient, or no representation was
        made at all. No tests were run, but the effluent was reported to have no visible
        plume in eight of the 10 cases, and the stack appearance was not available in
        the other two. The single wet scrubber was of the "wet dynamic" type and was
        reported to have an efficiency of 87.5%.  This stack was reported to have a
        visible plume.

               Four of the installations were reported to serve gas flows far  in excess
        of that generated by a single cupola, and probably represent  a single collector
        installed to handle a variety of furnaces ventilated through a common stack.

                              Lead Reverberatory  Furnaces

               Three companies reported a total of 17 installations  over the 10 year
        period from  1960 to 1970. The complete tabulation is given in Table 86. These
        were all fabric collectors, most of which used  Orion bags. Temperatures were
        all below 275°F, with  only  one  below 230°F. The average size was 18,000
        ACFM, but  some of the installations were sized to include a blast furnace,
        sweating furnace, or other equipment  in addition to the reverberatory furnace.

               Efficiencies  were  represented  to be 99.85  or 99.9+  wherever  a
        representation was made. All the stacks were reported to be clear where there
        was a record of a stack observation.

-------
                                                                  Table 84


                                               Summary of Installation Data for Lead Cupolas
(1)
TEST
NO.




1


2


3

4



5


6

(2)
CAP.
OF
UNIT

T/D

NA


28.3


NA

NA



NA


5

(3)
TYPE OF RAW
MATERIAL OR
CHARGE



NA


NA


NA

NA



NA

Lead Dross
Battery Plates
Coke § Slag
(4)
FUEL
USED




NA


NA


NA

NA



NA

Soft
Coal

(5)
TYPE
COLLECTOR



Fabric
Shaker
Orion
Fabric
Shaker
Acrylic
Automatic
Shaker
Orion
Intermit-
:ent Shake]
Type
Orion
Fabric
Shaker
Fiberglas
Dynamic
Scrubber

(5a)
YEAR
PLACED
IN
SERVICE


1961


1964


1964

• 1964



1965
>

1965

(6)
GAS
VOLUME
ACFM



350,000


14,680


40,000

3,800



100,000


8,000

(7)
INLET
TEMP.
°F



200


250


250

250



350


700

(8a) (8b)
MEASURED
DUST LOADING
GR/ACF

INLET

NA


NA


NA

NA



NA


4.3

OUTLET

NA


NA


NA

NA



NA


0.54

(9)
DESIGN
EFF.
WT. %



99.9 +


99.9+


NA

NA



99.9+


87.5

(10)
IS
PLUME
VISIBLE



NO


NO


NO

NO



NO


YES

(O
CO

-------
ro
           Table 84 — continued




Summary of Installation Data for Lead Cupolas
(1)
TEST
NO.
7
8
9
10
11

(2)
CAP.
OF
UNIT
T/D
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA

(3)
TYPE OF RAW
MATERIAL OR
CHARGE
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA

(4)
FUEL
USED
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA

(5)
TYPE
COLLECTOR
Fabric
Shaker
Filtron
Tubes
Fabric
Shaker
Filtron
Tubes
Fabric
Shaker
Orion
Fabric
Fabric

(5a)
YEAR
PLACED
IN
SERVICE
1967
1967
1969
1970
1970

(6)
GAS
VOLUME
ACFM
450,000
450,000
22,500
23,000
16,000

(7)
INLET
TEMP.
°F
230
230
275
200°F.
120°F.

(8a) (8b)
MEASURED
DUST LOADING
GR/ACF
INLET
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA

OUTLET
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA

(9)
DESIGN
EFF.
WT. %
99.9+
99.9+
99.9+
99.85
99.85

(10)
IS
PLUME
VISIBLE
NO
NO
NO
NA
NA

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC.
              4.     Lead/Aluminum Sweating Furnaces

              Table  85 is a compilation of all of the  installations reported by  the
       IGCI member companies.

              A total of 18 installations were made by three companies. The furnace
       usage was designated as follows:
                                           Fabric
         Wet
Total
              Lead Sweating
              Aluminum Sweating
              Lead/Aluminum Sweating
6
6
                                            12
  6
  6
  6
                        18
              The  fabric  collectors were  most frequently represented as "99.9+"
       percent efficient, while the scrubbers were all  represented to be 98% efficient.
       No test data was available for any of the installations.

              Several of the lead sweating fabric collectors were represented to serve
       more than one furnace. The inclusion of reverberatory furnaces and cupolas in
       the same gas handling system is common for fabric collector installations in
       lead  smelting plants. The scrubbers  were  apparently special  purpose devices
       tailored to a single furnace.

-------
CO
                    Table 85




Summary of Installation Data  for Sweating Furnaces
(1)
TEST
NO.




1

2


3


4


5

6
(2)
CAP.
OF
UNIT

T/D

NA

NA


NA


NA


NA

NA
(3)
TYPE OF RAW
MATERIAL OR
CHARGE



NA
(lead)

NA
Clead)

NA
(lead)

NA
(lead)

NA
(lead)
Lead Scrap
(4)
FUEL
USED




NA

NA


NA


NA


NA

NA
(5)
TYPE
COLLECTOR



Fabric
Repressure
Fiberglas:
Fabric -
Shaker
Type with
Orion
Fabric -
:ntermittei
Shaker Tyj
w/Orlon
Fabric -
Shaker
Filtron
Fabric-
Shaker
Dacron
Fabric
(5a)
YEAR
PLACED
IN
SERVICE


d 1960

1964


t 1964
ie

1967


1967

1967
(6)
GAS
VOLUME
ACFM



10,000

40,000


3,800


450,000


7,000

25,000
(7)
INLET
TEMP.
°F



500

250


250


230


NA

250
(8a) (8b)
MEASURED
DUST LOADING
gr/ACF

INLET

NA

NA


NA


NA


NA

NA
OUTLET

NA

NA


NA


NA


NA

NA
(9)
DESIGN
EFF.
WT. %



99.9+

NA


NA


99.9+


99.9+

99.85
(10)
IS
PLUME
VISIBLE



NO

NO


NO


NO


NO


-------
                                                              Table 85 — continued


                                              Summary of Installation Data for Sweating Furnaces
(1)
TEST
NO.
7
8
9
10
11
12
(2)
CAP.
OF
UNIT
T/D
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(3)
TYPE OF RAW
MATERIAL OR
CHARGE
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(aluminum)
NA
(aluminum)
(4)
FUEL
USED
NA
NA
NA
NA
tet.Gas
#2 Oil
Standby
^lat.Gas
#2 Oil -
standby
(5)
TYPE
COLLECTOR
Fabric
Shaker
Orion
Fabric
Shaker
Orion
Fabric
Shaker
Fire Ret.
Tubes
Fabric
Shaker
Cot.Sateei
Automatic
' Shaker
Dacron
Automatic
Shaker
Daeron
(5a)
YEAR
PLACED
IN
SERVICE
1962
1964
1968
1969
1970
1970
(6)
GAS
VOLUME
ACFM
14,000
30,000
14,112
40,000
37,500
32,500
(7)
INLET
TEMP.
°F
320
NA
150
160
250
250
(8a) (8b)
MEASURED
DUST LOADING
gr./ACF
INLET
10.0
2.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
OUTLET
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(9)
DESIGN
EFF.
WT. %
99.9+
99.9+
99.9+
99.9+
NA
NA
(10)
IS
PLUME
VISIBLE
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
to

-------
N)
CO
00
                Table 85 — continued


Summary of  Installation  Data for Sweating  Furnaces
(1)
TEST
NO.




13


14


15


16


17


18

(2)
CAP.
OF
UNIT



48


48


48


48


48


48

(3)
TYPE OF RAW
MATERIAL OR
CHARGE


Non Ferrous Metal
(Aluminum § Lead
Scrap)

Non Ferrous Metal
(Scrap)

Non Ferrous Metal
(Scrap)

Non Ferrous Metal
(Scrap)

Non Ferrous Metal
(Scrap)

Non Ferrous Metal
(Scrap)
(4)
FUEL
USED




Nat.
Gas

Nat.
Gas

Nat.
Gas

Nat.
Gas

Nat.
Gas

Nat.
Gas
(5)
TYPE
COLLECTOR



Venturi
Scrubber
9"wg
Venturi
Scrubber
on
y wg
Venturi
Scrubber
9"wg
Venturi
Scrubber
9"wg
Venturi
Scrubber
9"wg
Venturi
Scrubber
9" wg
(5a)
YEAR
PLACED
IN
SERVICE


1968


1968


1968


1968


1969


1969

(6)
GAS
VOLUME
ACFM



20,000


20,000


20,000


20,000


20,000


20,000

(7)
INLET
TEMP.
°F



1,600


1,600


1,600


1,600


1,600


1,600

(8a) (8b)
MEASURED
DUST LOADING
gr/ACF

INLET

1.0


1.0


1.0


1.0


1.0


1.0

OUTLET

NA


NA


NA


NA


NA


NA

(9)
DESIGN
EFF.
WT. %



98.0


98.0


98.0


98.0


98.0


98.0

(10)
IS
PLUME
VISIBLE



NA


NA


NA


NA


NA


NA

-------
                                                                 Table 86 '


                                       Summary of  Instajlation Data for  Lead Reverberatory Furnaces
(1)
TEST
NO.



1




2

3


4


5


6

(2)
CAP.
OF
UNIT
T/D

700




NA

NA


342


NA


NA

(3)
TYPE OF RAW
MATERIAL OR
CHARGE


Junk Batteries §
by-products
tin

NA


NA


NA


NA


NA

(4)
FUEL
USED



NA



NA


Nat.
Gas

Nat.
Gas

Oil


NA

(5)
TYPE
COLLECTOR


Fabric
Shaker
Orion

Fabric
Shaker
Orion
Fabric
Shaker
Orion
Fabric
Shaker
Orion
Fabric
Shaker
Orion
Automatic
Shaker
Orion
(5a)
YEAR
PLACED
IN
SERVICE

1961



1963


1963


1963


1964


1964

(6)
GAS
VOLUME
ACFM


12,000



25,000


4,920


12,500


30,000


40,000

(7)
INLET
TEMP.
°F


250



260


250


275


250


250

(8a) (8b)
MEASURED
DUST LOADING
./ACF

INLET

NA



NA


8. 4 mg
M3

NA


NA


NA

OUTLET

NA



NA


NA


NA


NA


NA

(9)
DESIGN
EFF.
WT. \


99.9+



99.9+


99.9+


99.9+


99.9+


NA

(10)
IS
PLUME
VISIBLE


NO



NO


NO


NO


NO


NO

NJ
GO

-------
IV)
-ti
o
                     Table 86 — continued



Summary of Installation Data for Lead Reverberatory  Furnaces
(1)
TEST
NO.



7
8


9


10



11


i ?

(2)
CAP.
OF
UNIT

T/D
NA
NA


118


NA



106-
120



(3)
• TYPE OF RAW
MATERIAL OR
CHARGE


NA
NA


NA
(4)
FUEL
USED



NA
NA

40 gal.
per hr.
~#2
Fuel Oi

NA



0 NA

3 e
NA


NA


30 gal.
>er hr.
#5
-uel Oi
ich 	
NA

(5)
TYPE
COLLECTOR




Fabric
Shaker
Acrylic
Fabric
Shaker
Orion
Fabric
Shaker
Cotton
Jateen
Fabric
Shaker
Filtron

Fabric
Shaker
Orion
(5a)
YEAR
PLACED
IN
SERVICE

1963
1965


1965


1967



1967


1967

(6)
GAS
VOLUME
ACFM


8,000
12,000


22,500


5,000



15,000


15,000

(7)
INLET
TEMP.
°F


NA
250


250


180



250


260

(8a) (8b)
MEASURED
DUST LOADING
gr/ACF

INLET
NA
NA


NA


(very :



NA


NA

OUTLET
NA
NA


NA


ight)



NA


NA

(9)
DESIGN
EFF.
WT. %


99.85
99.9+


99.9+


99.9+



99.9+


99.9+

(10)
IS
PLUME
VISIBLE


NA
NO


NO


NO



NO


NO

-------
                     Table 86 - continued




Summary  of  Installation Data for Lead Reverberatory Furnaces
(1)
TEST
NO.





13

14


15

16
17


(2)
CAP.
OF
UNIT




NA

NA


NA

NA
NA


(3)
TYPE OF RAW
MATERIAL OR
CHARGE



2 eac
NA

NA


NA

NA
NA


(4)
FUEL
USED




V 	
n 	
NA

NA


NA

NA
NA


(5)
TYPE
COLLECTOR



Fabric
Shaker
Orion
Automatic
Shaker
Orion
Automatic
Shaker
Orion
Fabric
Fabric
Shaker
Orion

(5a)
YEAR
PLACED
IN
SERVICE



1967

1967


1969

1970
1970


(6)
GAS
VOLUME
ACFM




20,000

19,000


40,000

6,000
18,000


(7)
INLET
TEMP.
°F




260

230


230

120
275

-
(8a) (8b)
MEASURED
DUST LOADING
gr/ACF

INLET


NA

NA


NA

NA
NA


OUTLET


NA

NA


NA

NA
NA


(9)
DESIGN
EFF.
WT. %




99.9+

NA


NA

99.85
99.9+


(10)
IS
PLUME
VISIBLE




NO

NO


NO

NA
NO


-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS CLEANING    INSTITUTE, INC
             5.
Zinc Calcination Furnace
             Although little information regarding the calcination of secondary zinc
      oxide was uncovered, five applications of fabric collectors on "zinc kilns" were
      reported. No  information was available with regard to the process other than
      the gas flow and temperature. In fact, even the gas flow was not reported for
      one of the five.

             For each application,  the  gas temperature was limited  to the range
      where  Dacron bags are  generally  suitable  if there  is no acid condensation
      problem.  The  efficiency was  specified  as  99.85%  or 99.9+%  by  the
      manufacturer  in each case. These applications are listed in Table 87.

-------
                                                                Table  87




                                        Summary of Installation  Data for  Zinc Calcination Furnaces
(1)
TEST
NO.
1
2
3
4
5
(2)
CAP.
OF
UNIT
T/D
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(3)
TYPE OF RAW
MATERIAL OR
CHARGE
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(4)
FUEL
USED
NA
NA
NA
NA
Nat.
Gas
(5)
TYPE
COLLECTOR
Fabric
Fabric
Tubes
fur. by
Customer
Fabric
Fabric
:abric
Tubes .
fur. by
Customer
(5a)
YEAR
PLACED
IN
SERVICE
1960
1965
1966
1967
1969
(6)
GAS
VOLUME
ACFM
10,300
450,000
10,000
NA
30,000
(7)
INLET
TEMP.
CF
230
250
275
NA
260
(8a) (8b)
MEASURED
DUST LOADING
gr/ACF
INLET
NA
NA
NA
NA
30
OUTLET
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(9)
DESIGN
EFF.
WT. %
99.85
99.9+
99.85
99.85
99. 9+
(10)
IS
PLUME
VISIBLE
NA
NO
NA
NA
NO

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE,  INC
             6.
Aluminum Chlorination Station
             Four manufacturers reported  installation of a total of six  systems for
      chlorination of secondary aluminum. The scrubbers and results obtained varied
      widely from one application to another.

             Three of the scrubbers were of the "mobile packing" variety, in which
      plastic spheres or glass marbles serve as the packing. These varied from 25" wg
      to 55" wg, with efficiencies as follows:

                             AP in wg          E.%
                                 25
                                 30
                                 55
                           96
                           99
                           99.1 to 99.8
             The efficiency varied with grain loading at the scrubber inlet, as well as
      with pressure drop, indicating that the scrubbers were most effective on the
      paniculate material where the concentration was high.

             The other three installations were Venturi scrubbers operating at 14 to
      45" wg.  These showed  outlet grain  loadings lower than  the mobile packed
      scrubbers, but the only efficiencies reported are 90-95 and 95%, which is lower
      than for  the  mobile  packed scrubbers. This appears to relate to the very  low
      inlet grain  loading  for  the Venturi  scrubber, however, rather  than  to  the
      performance  characteristics  of  Venturis.  Very  low  inlet  loadings  are more
      typical of primary chlorination than secondary.

             The installation data reported is given in Table 88.

-------
                                                                   Table  88
                                       Summary of Installation  Data for Aluminum Chlorination Stations
(1)
TEST
NO.
1
2
3
4
5
6
(2)
CAP.
OF
UNIT
T/D
37.5
28.5
NA
45
NA
50
(3)
TYPE OF RAW
MATERIAL OR
CHARGE
Scrap Aluminum
Chlorine Rate NA
Scrap Aluminum,
750 Ib/hr chlorine
(Producing Alloy
380Z3)
Secondary Scrap
and Chlorine
Chlorination in
Secondary Alumi-
num Smelter
NA
Mill ends, pig
aluminum-210 Ib/hr.
Cl2 (Producing
Alloy 3003)
(4)
FUEL
USED
NA,
jrob-
ably
^lat.Gas
Nat.
Gas
Gas
Nat.
Gas
NA
Nat.
Gas
(5)
TYPE
COLLECTOR
Scrubber
@30" w c
Scrubber
@25" w c
Venturi §
'recooler
29" wg
3-Bed
Hi-Energy
Wet
Scrubber
Wet
Scrubber
14" AP
Scrubber
'Venturi)
!45" w c
(5a)
YEAR
PLACED
IN
SERVICE
1964
1965
1967-
1968
1968
1969
1969
(6)
GAS
VOLUME
ACFM
NA
(1600)
NA
(2000)
15,000
(9,000)
5,000
to !
6,230
3,000
(2500)
(7)
INLET
TEMP.
°F
810
(82°)
NA
(135°)
800
(140)
138°
Jcrubber
Outlet
'emp.98°
120
(175)
(8a) (8b)
MEASURED
DUST LOADING
GR/ACF
INLET
50
12.
- •
2.79 t<
11.80
Avg.
F 6.70
NA
1.5
OUTLET
0.5
0.5
0.05
• 0.0046
to
0.084
Avg.
. I) 34
-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE,  INC.
      VI.    CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION

             The data collected and reported substantiate several conclusions:

             A.     All of the applications covered can be treated adequately with
                    conventional air pollution control equipment.

             B.     Electrostatic precipitators are currently limited to the lime kiln
                    application by the economics of small precipitators relative to
                    fabric collectors or scrubbers.

             C.     Fabric collectors are acceptable for all the applications except
                    aluminum chlorination.

             D.     Wet scrubbers are acceptable for all of the applications, but are
                    less frequently used for'fine fumes in secondary smelting than
                    fabric collectors.

             E.     Wet scrubbers must be used for aluminum chlorination stations.
             F.     Mechanical collectors are not  adequate for good  pollution
                    control  in any  of the areas, although they are often  used  as
                    precleaners.
             In addition to these generalizations with.respect to the data presented,
      several conclusions were drawn regarding the program organization and scope:

             A.     The combination of the rotary lime kiln application  area with
                    the secondary smelting areas detracts from the continuity of the
                    report. The data might be more easily read and interpreted if
                    these two areas were reported separately.

             B.     The several smelting areas covered do not embrace all secondary
                    smelting  operations.  For  example,   zinc  sweating,  various
                    crucible operations, etc. were omitted. The value  of the data
                    would be enhanced by filling these gaps at some future time.

             C.     The program  organization employed was effective  in achieving
                    the goals set up. That is, the data in possession of  the member
                    companies was obtained  in  a cooperative atmosphere which
                    would not ordinarily exist if a contractor other than  IGCI was
                    assigned to collect it.

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC
                    The combination of Coordinating Engineer — Project Director
                    — member company participants provided a good distribution
                    of work load.

                    The ability of the member companies to produce information
                    of the type required here varied in accord with how closely the
                    functions relate  to normal  business  practice.  The  various
                    information producing  functions are listed  in accord with the
                    ease of production (as judged by the Coordinating Engineer and
                    Project Director):

                         Bid Prices — easiest
                         Specifications
                         Narratives
                         Data on old installations
                         Non-routine clerical or statistical work — most difficult

                    The installation  and test data was  limited  by the lack of air
                    pollution control in the secondary metals area. If an industrial
                    area were chosen for a  similar study which was more generally
                    serviced  by the air pollution control equipment manufacturers,
                    the information would be more complete and detailed than that
                    contained in this report. Examples of such industrial areas are:

                         Paper mills
                         Utility power generation
                         Rock products
                         Primary Metals

-------
INDUSTRIAL  GAS CLEANING INSTITUTE, INC.

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING  INSTITUTE, INC
                          APPENDIX  I
                     Program Planning & Execution

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC
              PROGRAM PLANNING AND EXECUTION

              The initial work on this program was aimed toward providing a suitable
       work  plan  and  subdivision  of  the functions  among  the  IGCI member
       companies,  the  Executive Secretary, various  IGCI   committees and  the
       Coordinating Engineer.

              Program execution began during the first week in July, which was used
       by  members of the IGCI  Government  Relations Committee to interview
       candidates for employment as Coordinating Engineer. Several candidates were
       considered, all of whom were formerly associated with member companies, but
       no longer have any affiliation with either  member companies or with IGCI.On
       the basis of these  interviews, L. C. Hardison of Air Resources, Inc. in Palatine,
       Illinois was selected.  Herbert R. Herington, Executive Secretary of IGCI,  was
       named Project Director.

                                 Division of Functions

              The Project Director, Coordinating Engineer and Government Relations
       Committee agreed upon a division of work among the parties involved, which
       was followed during the course of the program. This division is as follows:

              1.     Drafting of  reports, forms, instructions, etc.,  plus technical
                    editing of all material  - Coordinating Engineer (L. C. Hardison)

              2.     Preparation   of  mailings,  correspondence  with  member
                    companies, preparation of material in final form — IGCI Project
                    Director (Herbert R. Herington)

              3.     Approval  of all technical  material to be  made available for
                    publication, general review  and  approval of program progress,
                    and selection of member companies for preparation of narrative
                    descriptions  and bid  price  data —  Engineering  Standards
                    Committee (Harry Krockta, Chairman)

              4.     Basic Program direction — Government Relations Committee,
                    (Hugh Mullen, Chairman)  with Project  Director, Herbert  R.
                    Herington.

              This  working arrangement was put into effect during the second week
       of July, with the preparation of the Work Plan Draft.

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC
              The Work Plan Draft was prepared by L. C. Hardison after a review of
       the pertinent contract documents  and conferences with Hugh Mullen for the
       Government Relations Committee and Project Director Herington.

              The  draft  was  reviewed by the members of  the  IGCI Engineering
       Standards Committee and revised after comments were received. The final draft
       was prepared by  the Coordinating  Engineer and  the  Project Director, and
       submitted to NAPCA on July 31, 1970.

                             Subdivision  of  the  Program

              In  order to complete the work  in the scheduled time period, it was
       necessary  to carry  out some of  the steps in  each  of the three categories
       simultaneously. A  work plan was drawn up which treated the three categories
       as  separate projects  insofar as possible in  order to  operate them  in parallel
       throughout the 6-month period of the project. The work plan centers around
       detailed calendars of events in each  of the three areas.

              Some'necessary interrelations were  taken into account.  For example,
       three  companies  were  selected   as most  qualified  to  prepare  narrative
       descriptions of the  processes. These were adjudged most  likely to  be best
       qualified to prepare bid prices. Some of the schedule dates in the work plan
       were adjusted so that they were the same in each of the parallel programs.

                             Preparation of the  Narratives

              The preparation of a concise narrative description of the process, the
       types  of  gas cleaning equipment  applicable,  and  the technical problems
       inherent in the application was done by an individual employee of a member
       company.

              Several steps were  taken  to assist the individual in  each  case  in
       preparing  an authoritative and readable document. As  a preliminary step, a
       brief survey of applicable literature  was made by the Coordinating Engineer,
       and references were furnished the company selected for preparation of the
       narrative. A general outline was furnished each participating company in order
       to avoid omissions and secure some consistency in form.

              All of the  IGCI  member companies known to have applications in the
       process area in question were solicited  to determine their  degree of interest
       prior to selecting the companies most qualified. From among those exhibiting
       significant interest, the three deemed most  qualified by the members of the

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS CLEANING    INSTITUTE, INC.
        IGCI Engineering  Standards  Committee  were selected  to  participate  in  a
        predraft seminar to cover the process in question  with the Coordinating
        Engineer. The representatives  of the three companies selected chose one of
        their employees to  prepare the draft of the narrative,  along with a  flow
        diagram.

              The draft was edited by the Coordinating Engineer and the final draft
        reviewed with the Engineering Standards Committee prior to submission.
        page.
              A detailed schedule of the steps in this process is given on the following
               Compilation and  Tabulation of Installation and  Test  Data
              The requirements of NAPCA as described  in the contract documents
        were followed as closely as possible in this area. However, the data forms were
        revised considerably by the Coordinating Engineer, with NAPCA concurrence,
        during the course of the project.

              The detailed  steps  in  the  process  of  review,  issue,  retrieval and
        compilation are given on the following page.

-------
INDUSTRIAL GAS CLEANING INSTITUTE, INC.
i
No.
of
Event
N-1
N-2
N-3
N-4
'N-5
N-6
N-7
N-8
N-9
N-10
N-11
N-12
N-13
N-14
Detailed Calendar for Narratives
WORK DONE BY
Coor. Ex. Engr. .. . .-..
Name of Event Engr. Sec. Stds. Memb' Other
Literature survey of
applicable general X
articles.
List Member Companies
cross referenced with
known areas of appli- X X
cation.
Solicit member
companies for level X
of interest (0-10 scale)
Prepare list of member
companies indicating
interest for review by X X
Engr. Stds. Comm.
Select three companies
in each category X
Schedule meetings of
representatives in X X
9 areas
Hold meetings X X
Prepare drafts of
narratives X
Review drafts X
Distribute drafts to
other participating X
member companies
Comment on drafts X
Review & Consolidate X
Final Draft Review X
Print and Distribute X
PROJECTED
COMPLETION
DATE
7-31
7-31
7-31
8-18
8-18
8-18
9-15
9-30
10-15
10-20
10-30
11-15
11-20
11-30
AC-
TUAL
DATE
7-31
7-31
7-31
8-18
8-18
8-18
9-3
10-20
11-5
11-11
11-15
11-19
12-17
12-31

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS  CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC
                              Detailed Calendar for Forms
  No.
   of
 Event  Name of Event
         WORK DONE BY
Coor.   Ex.    Engr.
Engr.   Sec.    Stds.
Memb.  Other
  F-1    Propose forms for       X
        submission to members

  F-2    Review with Chrm. of   X
        Engr. Stds. Comm.

  F-3    Distribute to members

  F-4    Receive returns and
        followup on non-return

  F-5    Edit returns

  F-6    Make statistical
        averages as required

  F-7    Prepare in final form
        for typing

  F-8    Final review

  F-9    Print and distribute
        X
 PROJECTED  AC-
COMPLETION TUAL
    DATE    DATE
                   7-31
               7-31
XXX
X
X X
1
X
X
X
X
X
7-31
8-15
9-15
9-31
10-5
10-30
11-15
11-30
7-31
8-8
11-16
11-16
11-16
11-18
12-17
12-31
        'Date of receipt of last form

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE,  INC
                Solicitation and Tabulation of  Bid  Prices for Systems

              This  section  comprises  the most  difficult  and probably  the most
       significant part of the project. Several of the steps involved are discussed in the
       following paragraphs.

              Emission standards for each application were selected.  In the case of
       the  LA-Process Weight * limitation, the problem was relatively simple. For the
       high efficiency specification, a relationship between particle size distribution,
       grain loading, plume depth  and the visible  threshold was investigated.  This
       relationship has not been established for the sources involved here. An arbitrary
       definition was proposed at a meeting between IGCI and the NAPCA Project
       Officer on August 12, and accepted. This is discussed  in more detail in the
       Technical Data Section of the Report.

              Specification  form exerts  a  significant influence on  the contractor's
       price, particularly when equipment is to perform to a specification such as "the
       stack shall  be clear". For this reason it  was  important that each company
       preparing a  specification worked to a common set of standards. This required a
       high degree of unanimity among  the member  companies on the form of the
       specification.

              In order to minimize the time required in completing this section of the
       program, the Coordinating Engineer drafted a general specification to apply to
       all  of  the  processes,  which was reviewed by the  Engineering  Standards
       Committee and all the participants.

              In the preparation of the bid prices,  companies chosen as most qualified
       by the  Engineering Standards Committee were  brought together to discuss the
       specifications (this meeting coincided with the seminar described in connection
       with writing the  process narratives),  after which the Engineering  Standards
       Committee  reviewed the specifications.  The three companies each prepared
       prices for two levels of abatement and three  sizes of process. The required
       information from  the bid forms was entered on the appropriate summary form
       by  the  Coordinating Engineer  without  reference to the name of the  firm
       submitting the proposal.

              The results were submitted to the Engineering Standards Committee for
       final approval. A  detailed  listing of the steps involved  in this process, and a
       tentative completion date for each  step is given on the following page.
       *AirPollution Control District County of Los Angeles Rule 54. See Appendix

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING    INSTITUTE,  INC.
   No.
   of
 Event

  P-1
  P-2
                            Detailed Calendar for Price Quotes

                                   WORK DONE BY
Name of Event
Coor.   Ex.    Engr.
Engr.   Sec.   Stds.
                                     Memb. Other
 PROJECTED   AC-
COMPLETION  TUAL
    DATE     DATE
  P-3



  P-4


  P-5

  P-6


  P-7

  P-8


  P-9

  P-10

  P-11

  P-12
Obtain pertinent sec-
tions of LA-APCD pro-   X
cess weight standard
Establish approximate
basis for weight emission
at "clear stack" con-     X
dition, for review by
Engr. Stds.
                                                                7-31
                                                                7-31
                                                7-31
                                                7-31
Prepare uniform speci-
fication for system X
for review by Engr. Stds.
Prepare form sheets for
installation data and X
Review with Engr. Stds. XXX
Submit to companies X
selected for narratives
Prepare cost estimates X
Receive completed X
estimates
Review and edit results X
Approve or revise X
Put in final form X
Print & distribute X
8-15
8-15
8-18
8-30
9-30
9-30
10-15
10-30
11-15
11-30
8-15
8-15
8-18
9-3
11-15
11-15
11-19
11-19
12-17
12-31
         * Date of receipt of last estimate

-------
 INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC.
                  I.3.C.I.   H.E.W.  CONTRACT SURVEY
                       DEADLINE IS APRIL  24
     Since 1960,  we have sold the  following number of installations
of gas clearing equipment in the following applications:

     1.  Lime industry
         a.   Rotary lime kiln (not including  lime sludge kilns)

               Number sold since January  1, 1960 	
     2.  Secondary non-ferrous  metallurgical  industry

                                 Number  sold since January 1, 1960

         a. Brass reverberatory furnace     	

         b. Lead cupola (blast  furnace)     	

         c. Lead sx/eating furnace           	

         d. Lead reverberatory  furnace      	

         e. Zinc calcining kiln            	

         f. Aluminum sweating furnace       	

         g. Aluminum Chlorination station  	

         h. Bronze reverberatory furnace    	



     Keep one copy and send one copy by April 24 to:

                         Mr.  Hugh Mullen
                         Buell  Engineering Co., Inc.
                         253  North  Fourth St.
                         Lebanon, Pa.  17042
                                   Name

                                Company

                                   Date

-------
   INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC
                   NAPCA CONTRACT INTEREST SURVEY
      Please indicate your company's  interest  in participating  in
 each of the following areas with respect  to each  type of equipment
 using a scale from 0-10, with

                     0 = no interest  whatsoever
                    10 « very strong  interest
      Area
         Interest Level

Elec.Precip.  Fabric  Wet Scrubbers
la Rotary Lime Kiln
2a Brass Reverberatory Furnace
2b Lead Cupola
2c Lead Sweating Furnace
2d Lead Reverberatory Furnace
2e Zinc Calcining Kiln
2f Aluminum Sweating Furnace
2g Aluminum Chlorination station
2h Bronze Reverberatory Furnace
                                Signed

                                Company
   DEADLINE -  JULY 28.  1970
   MAIL TO:
             H.  R. Herington
             P.  0. Box 448
             Rye, N. Y.  10580

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC
                            APPENDIX  II
               Detailed Instructions for Preparing Specifications

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC.
        DETAILED INSTRUCTIONS FOR PREPARING SPECIFICATIONS
     The I.G.C.I, as the contractor is to furnish NAPCA with an
analysis of cost requirements for collection systems  that  can meet
two levels of abatement:

     1) The LA-APCD Process Weight Regulation
     2) An arbitrary outlet grain loading as shown
        in the attached Table I.

     The second specification represents  a higher efficiency level
than the LA-APCD process weight regulation.   While these numbers
are frequently at or below the visible threshold,  they  do  not define
conditions at which a clear stack can be  obtained.

     Three sizes or capacities are to be  figured for  each  of the
collection systems involved.  This means  that the specification
given to a member company for preparation of a bid price must con-
tain enough information to define six cases  like this:
SMALL
LOW EFF.
MEDIUM
LOW EFF.
LARGE
LOW EFF.
                  SMALL
MEDIUM
LARGE
                 HIGH EFF.    HIGH EFF,    HIGH
     The six cases are to be repeated for  each collector  type
applicable to the industrial area.   The I.G.C.I.  Engineering Stan-
dards Committee has agreed upon the types  of equipment  applicable
to each area as shown in the attached Table  II.

     (There are 20 combinations of  equipment type and application
areas which should require 120 separate quotations from the 9
application groups.)

     In order to provide a uniform  basis to  each  of the companies
participating in the bid price preparation,  it is recommended  that

-------
  INDUSTRIAL  GAS CLEANING  INSTITUTE, INC.
                               - 2 -
this application group prepare a complete specification for the
equipment, consisting of the following items:

          1.   Scope
          2.   Process Description
          3.   Operating Conditions
          4.   Process Performance Guarantee
          5.   General Conditions

     For most cases, a single set of specifications will suffice
for items 1,  4 and 5 above,  regardless of the  equipment type or
application area.  The Engineering Standards Committee has approved
the wording of the sections  of the sample specification attached
for use in this way.  These  are given page numbers 1,  2, 5 and 6.

     Page 3,  to be written by the application  group, should contain:

     (1) A simple description of the equipment that is included,
covering the basic collector and items such as:.

         a) type of fabric (for fabric collectors)
         b) bag cleaning method (for fabric collectors)
         c) materials of construction (for wet scrubbers)

     (2) A concise definition of items that are to be  included in
the auxiliary equipment cost such as:

         a) fans
         b) dampers
         c) pumps

     (3) A brief description of the circumstances involved in
installation  of the equipment.

     Page 4,  to be written by the application  group, should summarize
the operating conditions to  which the equipment is to  be designed
and for which operating costs are to be developed.  The following
items should be specified for each of three sizes:

         a) Process capacity in appropriate units
         b) Inlet gas volume to the collector  in ACFM
         c) Inlet temperature, °p.
         d) Inlet contaminant loading
         e) Efficiency, wt 7»
         f) Controlled, or outlet contaminant  loading
         g) Outlet temperature (if different from inlet)


-------
  INDUSTRIAL  GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC.
                              - 3 -
         h)  Outlet gas volume, ACFM (if different from inlet)
         i)  Type of charge fed to the furnace: - dirty, oily,
            scrap, shavings, volatile metals, etc.

     Any additional information which will  add clarity to the cost
estimates should be included.

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS  CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC.
                           TABLE I
            DEFINITION OF OUTLET GRAIN LOADINGS FOR
                SECOND EFFICIENCY LEVEL BIDS
    1-a  Rotary Lime Kilns

    2-a  Brass Reverberatory Furnaces

      b  Lead Cupola

      c  Lead Sweating Furnace

      d  Lead Reverberatory Furnace

      e  Zinc Calciner

      f  Aluminum Sweating Furnace

      g  Aluminum Chlorination Station

      h  Bronze Reverberatory Furnace
Outlet
Loading
gr/ACF

 0.03

 0.01

 0.03

 0.03

 0.01

 0.01

 0.03

 0.02

 0.03

-------
10
o
                                                  TABLE II
                                DEFINITION OF COLLECTOR TYPES APPLICABLE TO
VARIOUS INDUSTRIAL AREAS
Collector
Type
Electrostatic
Precipitator
Fabric
Collector
Wet
Scrubber
la
Lime
Kiln
Yes
Yes
Yes
2a
Brass
Reverb .
No*
Yes
Yes
2b
Lead
Cupola
No*
Yes
Yes
2c 2d 2e 2f 2g 2h
Lead Lead Zinc Alum. Alum. Bronze
Sweat. Reverb. Calcin. Sweat. Chlor. Reverb.
No* Yes Yes No* No No*
Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes
Yes Yes Yes -Yes Yes Yes
       *  Note that Electrostatic Precipitators are not applicable to these areas

          only because the sources are too small to make precipitator application


-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING  INSTITUTE,  INC.
                           APPENDIX  III

                    Rule 54 of the Air Pollution Control
                      District of Los Angeles County

-------
INDUSTRIAL  GAS CLEANING  INSTITUTE, INC.
      Air Pollution Control  District
          County  of Los Angeles
                         RULES  AND
                      REGULATIONS
                 December 4,  1969
       434 South San Pedro Street, Los Angeles, California, 90013
                     MA 9-4711

-------
      INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING  INSTITUTE, INC
                       Rule 54.   Dust and Fumes
       A person shall not discharge in any one hour from any source
  whatsoever dust or fumes in total quantities in excess of the
  amount shown in the following table:   (see next page)

       To use the following table,  take the process weight per hour
  as such is defined in Rule 2(j).*  Then find this figure on the
  table, opposite which is the maximum number of pounds  of contam-
  inants which may be discharged into the atmosphere in  any one hour.
  As an example, if A has a process which emits contaminants into
  the atmosphere and which process  takes 3 hours to complete, he will
  divide the weight of all materials in the specific process, in this
  example, 1,500 Ibs. by 3 giving a process weight per hour of 500
  Ibs.  The table shows that A may  not discharge more than 1.77 Ibs.
  in any one hour during the process.  Where the process weight per
  hour falls between figures in the left hand column, the exact
  weight of permitted discharge may be interpolated.
* Rule 2 (j)
      Process  Weight  Per  Hour.   "Process Weight"  is  the
      total weight of all materials  introduced  into  any
      specific process which process may cause  any discharge
      into the atmosphere.   Solid  fuels charged will be
      considered as part  of  the  process weight, but  liquid
      and gaseous fuels and  combustion air will not.   "The
      Process  Weight  Per  Hour" will  be derived  by dividing
      the total process weight by  the number  of hours  in
      one complete operation from  the beginning of any
      given process to the completion thereof,  excluding
      any time during which  the  equipment is  idle.

(k).   Dusts. "Dusts"  are  minute  solid particles released
      into the air by natural forces or by mechanical
      processes such  as crushing,  grinding, milling, drilling,
      demolishing, shoveling, conveying, covering, bagging,
      sweeping, etc.

(1).   Condensed Fumes. "Condensed Fumes" are minute solid
      particles generated by the condensation of  vapors
      from solid matter after volatilization  from the  molten
      state, or may be generated by  sublimation,  distillation,
      calcination, or chemical reaction, when these  processes
      create air-borne particles.

-------
INDUSTRIAL GAS CLEANING
\
^••••••^^^••••^^^^^^^^^•^^^•^^^•^^•^^••M
'Process
Wt/hr(lb»)
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
650
700
750
800
850
900
950
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
1800
1900
2000
2100
2200
2300
2400
2500
2600
2700
2800
2900
3000
3100
3200
3300
•See Definition
TABLE
Maximum Weight 'Process
0!sch/hr(lb«) Wt/hr(lbs)
.24
.46
.66
.85
1 ..03
1.20
1.35
1.50
1.63
1.77
1.89
2.01
2.12
2.24
2.34
2.43
2.53
2.62
2.72
2. 80
2.97
3.12
3.26
3.40
3.54
3.66
3.79
3.91
4.03
4.14
4.24
4.34
4.44
4.55
4.64
4.74
4.84
4.92
5.02
5.10
5.18
5.27
5.36
3400
3500
3600
3700
3800
3900
4000
4100
4200
4300
4400
4500
4600
4700
4800
4900
5000
5500
6000
6500
7000
7500
8000
8500
9000
9500
10000
11000
12000
13000
14000
15000
16000
17000
18000
19000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
or
more
in Rule 2(j).
INSTITUTE, INC.

Maximum Weight
Disch /hr( Ibi)
5.44
5.52
. 5.61
5.69
5.77
5.85
5.93
6.01
6.08
6.15
6.22
6.30
6.37
6.45
6.52
6.60
6.67
7.03
7.37
7.71
8.05
8.39
8.71
9.03
9.36
9.67
10.0
10.63
11.28
11.89
12.50
13.13
13.74
14.36
14.97
15.58
16.19
22.22
28.3
34.3
40.0



                                                      37

-------
INDUSTRIAL  GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC.
                          APPENDIX  IV

                       Sample Specification for
                   Air Pollution Abatement Equipment

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC.
                                                       Page  1
              Specifications for Abatement  Equipment
1.   SCOPE
     A.  This specification covers  vendor requirements  for a
                                to  serve as  the principal abatement
device in a secondary smelting process.  The  intent  of  the  specifi-
cation is to describe the service  as  thoroughly  as possible so as
to secure vendor's proposal for equipment  which  is suitable in
every respect for the service intended.  Basic information  is
tabulated on pages 2, 3 and 4.  The vendor should specify any of
the performance characteristics which cannot  be  guaranteed  without
samples of process effluent.

     B.  The vendor shall supply all  labor, materials,  equipment,
and services to furnish one 	 together with
the following auxiliaries:

         1.  All ladders, platforms,  and other accessways to pro-
             vide convenient access to all points requiring
             observation or maintenance.

         2.  Foundation bolts as required.

         3.  Six (6) sets of drawings, instructions,  spare  parts
             list, etc., pertinent to the  above.

     The vendor shall not include  in  his base bid the following:

         1.  Erection

         2.  Foundation

         3.  External piping

         4.  Pumps

         5.  Fans (if not an internal part 'of the collector)

         6.  Dust or slurry handling  systems

-------
 INDUSTRIAL  GAS CLEANING  INSTITUTE, INC
                                                       Page  2
     C.  The vendor shall furnish the equipment  FOB point  of
manufacture, and shall furnish as a part  of this project competent
supervision of the erection,  which shall  be by others.

     D.  Vendor shall furnish the following drawings, etc., as
a minimum:

         1.  With his proposal:
               a. Plan and elevation showing general arrangement.
               b. Typical details of collector internals proposed.
               c. Data relating to projected performance with
                  respect to  pressure drop,  gas  absorption effi-
                  ciency and  particulate  removal efficiency to
                  gas and liquor flows.

         2.  Upon receipt of  order:
               a. Proposed schedule of design and delivery.

         3.  Within 60 days of order:
               a. Complete drawings of equipment for approval
                  by customer.
               b. 30 days prior to shipment:
                    1) Certified drawings of equipment, six sets
                    2) Installation instructions, six sets
                    3) Starting and operating instructions, six sets
                    4) Maintenance instructions  and recommended
                       spare  parts lists,  six sets

     E.  The design and construction of the collector and  auxili-
aries shall conform to the general conditions given on page 6, and
to good engineering practice.

-------
  INDUSTRIAL  GAS CLEANING  INSTITUTE, INC.
2.   PROCESS DESCRIPTION

     The scrubber is to handle the exhaust gas from a rotary lime
kiln fired by natural gas.  The filter will be used to remove lime-
stone and lime dust from the exhaust gas.   The rotary kiln is fed
with V to V limestone.  There is no preheater on the kiln and the
feed end of the kiln is equipped with a dust fall-out chamber.   The
dust chamber is followed by a wet scrubber with pre-cooling sprays
or saturation chamber as required.  Such pre-cooling equipment is
to be located at the discharge from the fall-out chamber,  and must
cool the ductwork to a maximum of 550°F.  It will be considered as
an integral part of the scrubber for this quotation.

     The exhaust gas will be brought from the precooling section to
a point twenty feet outside the building where a fan will  be located.
(The fan outlet is five (5) feet above grade.)  The scrubber will
be located in an area beyond the fan.  The area is free of space
limitations.  The scrubber is to be designed to withstand  the full
discharge pressure developed by the fan.

     The scrubber is to operate in such a manner as to continuously
attain the efficiency levels specified in the following section.

     The scrubber shall have a conical bottom designed to  avoid the
collection of sediment or deposits.  Liquor effluent is to be piped
to a recirculation tank from which the recirculation pump  takes
suction.  Fresh makeup water is to be added to the system at this
point.  Discharge from the recirculation pump is to be partially
returned to the scrubber and part withdrawn to a slurry settling
basin to be provided by the customer.  The slurry withdrawal is to
be set to maintain about 10 weight percent solids when the kiln is
operating at design capacity.

     The scrubber and external piping are to be constructed of
carbon steel.  Packing glands are to be flushed with fresh water
to prevent binding of the seals.

     For purposes of this quotation, the following is to be con-
sidered auxiliary equipment:

     (1) pumps and reservoir
     (2) fan
     (3) external piping
     (4) controls

-------
  INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC.
3.   OPERATING CONDITIONS

     Three sizes of scrubbers are to be  quoted  for  each of  two
     levels of efficiency.
Furnace capacity,  ton
Production rate,  Ib/hr
Process weight rate,  Ib/hr
Inlet gas volume,  ACFM
Inlet gas temperature, OF
Inlet loading, Ib/hr
Inlet loading, gr/ACF
Outlet gas volume, ACFM
Outlet gas temperature, °F
                                                  (B)
                                                Medium
125
10,400
18,700
35,000
1,200
015
2.32
19,000
164
250
20,800
37,400
85,000
1,200
1,960
2.69
46,000
164
500
41,600
74,800
150,000
1,200
3,500
2.72
81,000
164
                    Case 1 - LA Process  Weight
Outlet loading, #/hr
Outlet loading, gr/ACF
Efficiency, wt %
15.40
0.094
93.1
26.7
0.068
98.6
40
0.053
98.9
                     Case 2 -  High Efficiency
Outlet loading, #/hr
Outlet loading, gr/ACF
Efficiency, wt 7.
 4.09
 0.03
99.4
11.85
 0.03
99.4
20.8
 0.03
99.4

-------
 INDUSTRIAL   GAS  CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC.
                                                       Page 5
4.   PROCESS PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE
     A.  The
will be guaranteed to reduce
the particulate and/or gas contaminant  loadings as indicated in
the service description.

     B.  Performance test will be  conducted  in accordance with
I.G.C.I, test methods where applicable.

     C.  Testing shall be conducted at  a  time mutually agreeable
to the customer and the vendor.

     D.  The cost of the  performance test is to be included in
vendor's proposal as an alternate.
     E.  In the event the
            fails to comply
with the guarantee at the specified  design conditions, the vendor
shall make every effort to correct any defect expeditiously at his
own expense.  Subsequent retesting to obtain a satisfactory result
shall be at the vendor's expense.

-------
 INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING  INSTITUTE, INC
                                                       Page  6
5.   GENERAL CONDITIONS

     A.  Materials and Workmanship

     Only new materials of the best quality  shall be  used  in  the
manufacture of items covered by this specification.   Workmanship
shall be of high quality and performed by competent workmen.  ,

     B.  Equipment

     Equipment not of vendor's manufacture furnished  as  a  part  of
this collector shall be regarded in every respect as  though it
were of vendor's original manufacture.

     C.  Compliance with Applicable Work Standards and Codes

     It shall be the responsibility of the vendor to  design and
manufacture the equipment specified in compliance with the practice
specified by applicable codes.

     D.  Delivery Schedules

         1.  The vendor shall arrange delivery of equipment
             under this contract so as to provide for unloading
             at the job site within a time period specified by
             the customer.  Vendor shall provide for  expediting
             and following shipment of materials to the  extent
             required to comply with delivery specified.
                               o 0 o

-------
INDUSTRIAL  GAS CLEANING  INSTITUTE, INC.

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC.
                            APPENDIX  V

                     Detailed Instructions for Preparing
                           Bid Price Proposals

-------
  INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING  INSTITUTE, INC.
              INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING TABLE III
Items (1) through (6);  The information requested in items (1)
     through (6) of Table III is to be taken from the specification.

Item (7):  System horsepower is to include the estimated horsepower
     at design conditions for the fan and pump drivers.

Item (8);  Equipment costs are for immediate delivery.

     A.  The collector is to be figured on a flange-to-flange
         basis and to include no auxiliaries.

     B.  The Process Description section of the specification
         spells out what is to be included as "auxiliaries" in
         each case.

     C.  Gas conditioning equipment includes such items as water
         quench systems, and chemical additive systems for altering
         flyash resistivity.

     D.  Waste equipment includes such items as wet scrubber slurry
         disposal and dry collector solids handling equipment.

     E.  "Other" can be used for such equipment items as standby
         or safety equipment, water reservoirs, and chemical
         storage tanks.

Item (9);  Covers the expected difference between the total turnkey
     cost of the complete system, and the equipment cost listed in
     item (3).   This is to be estimated alternately for a complete
     new facility (grass roots), and for back-fit into an existing
     plant (add-on).  For purposes of this study, the turnkey
     prices are to be figured as though the installation were to be
     made in Milwaukee, Wisconsin where hourly labor rates in the
     construction trades are near the average for the U.  S.   A
     tabulation of an hourly rate index for major U.  S.  cities,
     along with a list of the average hourly rates for various
     trades is  attached.

Item (10);  The nominal life of the equipment in years is to
     represent  your best estimate of actual service life.  This
     does not constitute a representation which can be applied to
     any future specific sale,  but should be your best estimate
     for the average life equipment in this kind of service.


-------
  INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING  INSTITUTE, INC
                                                      Page  2
Item (11);  An estimate  of yearly maintenance costs is  required
     here.  This should  include an estimate of man-hours  for
     service,  plus  a dollar figure for replacement parts,  etc.
NOTE;  Please use one  form for the high efficiency case,  and
       another for the low efficiency case.
                              o 0 o

-------
  INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING  INSTITUTE, INC
  August 24,  1970


  TO:    Participants in NAPCA Project

  FROM:   L.C. .Hardison, Coordinating Engineer


  SUBJECT:   Bid Price Proposals  for Erection


  The  contract  with NAPCA specifies that  turnkey  prices  are

  to be  submitted and that variations  in  cost  from  area  to area

  are  to be discussed.   Gary Evans, the NAPCA  Project  Officer }

  has  suggested a relatively simple way of  handling this.


  Attached  is  a copy of City Cost  Indexes taken from "Building

  Construction  Cost Data,  1970"*.  This gives  a construction

  cost index  for 90 cities,  using  100  as  the national  average.

  These  are for the building trades, as reported  by the  U.S.

  Department  of Labor.   A copy of  the  rates  by trade is  also

  attached.


  While  these  figures do not take  productivity differences into

  account,  it will  be acceptable to NAPCA if we choose a base

  location  with a labor index of about 100  (such  as  Milwaukee,

  Wisconsin) .   The  variation in  labor  rate  can be discribed by

  using  the "City Cost  Index" table.   Variations  in  productivity

  can  be handled by soliciting comments from the  companies pre-

  paring bid prices as  to  areas where productivity  is  likely to be

  unusually high or low.
                                       L.C. Hardison
                                       Coordinating Engineer
  *   by  Robert  Sturgis  Godfrey, published by Robert Snow Means

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS  CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC.
     ..U..1OI' rates used  in this edition are as  listed below for 1970.  They are averages of
 tiie 30 largest cities in the U.S. as reported by the U.S. Dept.  of Labor and are
 subs tent ial ly tiie same as listed by Engineering News—Record. The rates have been
 roundec out to the nearest 5^ and include fringe benefits but do not include  insurance
 or taxes.
Trade
Common Building Labor
Ski 1 led Average
Helpers Average
foremen (usually 35c over trade)
Bricklayers
Bricklayers Helpers
Carpenters
moment Finis hers
£ lectricians
G laz iers
Hoist n ng ineers
Lathers
Marble & Terrazzo Workers
Painters, Ordinary
Pointers, Structural Steel
Paperhangers
P lasterers
Plasrcrers Helpers
? lumbers
Power Shovel or Crane Operator
Rodmen (Reinforcing)
Roofers, Composition
Roofers, Tile & Slate
Roofers Helpers (Composition)
Steamf itters
Sprinkler Installers
Structural Steel Workers
T ile Layers ( F loor)
T ile Layers Helpers
Truck Drivers
Welders, Structural Steel
1970
$5.00
6.85
5.15
7.20
7.15
5.20
6.95
6.75
7.50
6.25
7.05
6.60
6.45
6.20
6.50
6.30
6.60
5.30
7.75
7.20
7.30
6.30
6.35
4.75
7.70
7.70
7.45
6.50
5.25
5.15
7.15
1969
$4.55
6.05
4.65
6.40
6.40
4.70
6.15
5.90
6.45
5.50
5.90
5.95
5.60
5.45
5.80
5.60
5.95
4.85
6.90
6.20
6.35
5.55
> 5.60
4.45
6.90
6.90
6.45
5.60
4.80
4.60
6.35
1968
$4.10
5.50
4.20
5.85
5.85
4.30
5.40
5.30
5.95
5.10
5.40
5.45
5.25
5.05
5.30
5.15
5.50
4.45
6.15
5.65
5.80
5.05
5.10
4.00
6.10
6.10
5.90
5.20
4.35
4.30
5.80
1967
$3.85
5.15
4.00
5.50
5.55
4.05
5.10
5.05
5.60
4.75
5.10
5.20
5.05
4.75
4.95
4.75
5.15
4.15
5.75
5.35
5.45
4.75
4.85
3.75
5.70
5.70
5.55
4.90
4.15
3.95
5.45
1966
$3.65
4.90
H
3.85
5.25
5.35
3.95
4.90
4.85
5.45
4.60 ".
4.85
5.05 *
4.90
4.50 :
4.8C
4.55 I
5.00
4.00
5.55
5.05
5.15
4.65
4.80
3.55
5.50
5.50
5.25
4.80
4.05
3.65
5.10

-------
INDUSTRIAL    GAS  CLEANING   INSTITUTE,  INC.
                                                            (p. i)

                Tabulated below are average construction cost indexes for 90 major U.S. and Canadian
            cities. There are two index figures, one for Labor Rates as compared io the 30 major cities
            with U.S. average of 100, the other for Overall or Total construction costs using 100 as ihe
            average for 1969 for the 30 major cities. (Cor.f'd on next page)
Average 1969 Construction Cost & Labor Indexes
City
Albany, N.Y.
Albuquerque, N.M
Arnarillo, Tx.
Anchorage, Ak.
Atlanta, Ga.
Baltimore, Md.
Baton Rouge, La.
Birmingham, Al.
Boston, Mo.
Bridgeport, Ct.
Buffalo, N.Y.
Burlington, Vt.
Charlotte, N.C.
Chattanooga, Tn.
Chicago, III.
Cincinnati, Oh.
Cleveland, Oh.
Columbus, Oh.
Dallas, Tx.
Dayton, Oh.
Denver, Co.
Des Moines, la.
Detroit, Mi.
Edmonton, Cn.
El Paso, Tx.
Erie, Pa.
Evansville, In.
Grand Rapids, Mi.
Harrisburg, Pa.
Hartford, Ct.
Honolulu, Hi.
Houston, Tx.
Indianapolis, In.
Jackson, Ms.
Jacksonville, Fl.
Kansas City, Mo.
Knoxville, Tn.
Las Vegas, Nv.
Little Rock, Ar.
Los Angeles, Ca.
Louisville, Ky.
Madison, Wi.
Manchester, N.H.
Memphis, Tn.
Miami, Fl.
!nc
Labor
98
86
87
131
88
90
83
79
106
104
104
86
70
31
107
108
121
106
86
100
94
93
117
80
77
93
93
103
90
104
99
92
97
73
78
94
82
115
78
113
92
95
89
83
98
ex
Total
100
95
84
148
94
93
88
S6
103
102
107
90
75
84
103
104
112
99
89
103
91
96
111
83
83
99
97
99
92
100
109
89
98
75
79
93
82
107
81
102
93
98
92
82
94
City
Milwaukee, Wi.
Minneapolis, Mn.
Mobile, Al.
Montreal, Cn.
Nashville, Tn.
Newark, N.J.
New Haven, Ct. •
New Orleans, La.
New York, N.Y.
Norfolk, Vo.
Oklahoma City, Ok.
Omaha, Nb.
Philadelphia, Pa.
Phoenix, Az.
Pittsburgh, Pa.
Portland, Me.
Portland, Or.
Providence, R.I.
Richmond, Va.
Rochester, N.Y.
Rockford, III.
Sacramento, Ca.
St. Louis, Mo.
SaltLakeCity, Ut.
San Antonio, Tx.
San Diego, Ca.
San Francisco, Ca.
Savannah, Ga.
Scranton, Pa.
Seattle, Wa.
| Shreveport, La.
| South Bend, In.
Spokane, Wa.
Springfield, Ma.
Syracuse, N.Y.
Tampa, Fl.
Toledo, Oh.
Toronto, Cn.
Trenton, N.J.
Tulsa, Ok.
Vancouver, Cn.
Washington, D.C.
Wichita, Ks.
Winnipeg, Cn.
Youngstown, Oh.
1 ndex
Labor
103
99
94
77
79
122
102
89
132
73
82
90
106
101
110
82
102
98
76
no
109
117
no
93
82
111
124
72
94
104
82
99
101
99
105
81
105
84
114
85
81
98
85
62
107
Total
108
98
90
89
82
109
100
95
118
77
88
93
101
97
106
87
103
97
79
107
109
110
103
95
82
107
109
77
96
99
89
97
100
97
103
84
105
93
103
89
91
94
90
82
106
Historical Average
Year
1969
1968
1967
1966
1965
1964
1963
1962
1961
1960
1959
1958
1957
1956
1955
1954
1953
1952
1951
1950
1949
1948
1947
1946
1945
1944
1943
1942
1941
1940
1939
1938
1937
1936
1935
1934
1933
1932
1931
1930
1929
1928
1927
1926
1925
1924
Index
100
91
86
83
79
78
76
74
72
71
69
67
65
63
59
58 -
57
55
53
49
48
48
43
35
30
29
29
28
25
24
23
23
23
20
20
20
18
17
20
22
23
23
23
23
23
23
                                                138

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC
                            APPENDIX  VI

                         Detailed Instructions for
                           Listing Installations

-------
      INDUSTRIAL  GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC.
    IGCI
HERBERT R. HERINGTON
  Executive Secretary
National Association of Manufacturers  of Industrial  Gas Cleaning  Equipment

                                         Box 448, Rye, N. Y. 10580

                                         Telephone: Area Code 914
                                               WOodbine 7-7044


                                     August 8, 1970
          TO:  All Corporate Representatives

        FROM:  L. C. Hardison, Coordinating Engineer

     SUBJECT:  Summary of Installation Data
          The NAPCA contract with  I.G.C.I,  specifies  that the member
     companies prepare, for each of the  sources  below,  a listing of all
     the installations made since  January  1,  1960,  and  all the pertinent
     test data in the I.G.C.I, members'  files.   The sources to be included
     in this tabulation are:

      1.  Lime Industry (not including pulp or paper  mill applications)
             a. Rotary lime kiln

      2.  Secondary non-ferrous metallurgical industry
             a. Brass reverberatory furnace
             b. Lead cupola (blast furnace)
             c. Lead sweating furnace
             d. Lead reverberatory furnace
             e. Zinc calcining kiln
             f. Aluminum sweating  furnace
             g. Aluminum chlorination station
             h. Bronze reverberatory furnace

          All of the material requested  is  to be listed in Table I.   An
     example entry is included with your copies  of  the  blank forms to
     assist you in filling them out.  Duplicate  forms are included so you
     may retain a copy for your files.   In  addition,  some detailed
     instructions follow.

          Some comments apply generally.  An  installation consists of
     all of the equipment installed to process gas  from a single source.
     For example, if two scrubbers are operated  in  parallel on the gas
     from an aluminum chlorination station, they should be covered by
     a single entry.  The gas volume, etc., relates to  the total flow
     through both scrubbers.

-------
 INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING  INSTITUTE, INC.
Summary of Data
- 2 -
8/8/70
     It has been generally agreed that none of the applications
involved in the study can be handled adequately by a mechanical
collector alone.  However, there are many installations which incor-
porate a mechanical ahead of a precipitator, scrubber or filter.
Where this is the case, please treat the mechanical as a part of
the gas cleaning device, and call attention to the tandem arrange-
ment in the "remarks".

     Where only a part of the data requested is available, please
indicate the information which is not available in your files by
entering "NA" in the appropriate space.  The same abbreviation may
be used to indicate that information called for is not applicable
to the installation in question.

     Please note that there is no space for the name of your company
on the forms.  Be sure to attach something to identify the company
to the completed forms, but don't put your company name on the forms
themselves.  Return the completed forms to Herb Herington.

     The remainder of the comments and instructions pertain to the
individual columns in Table I, which are numbered across the top  of
the pages.

 1.  Column 1 is for the purpose of indexing the summary of tests
     from all of the member companies.   Please enter the data
     serially according to the date the installation was put into
     service, starting with January 1,  1960 and working toward
     the present.   Number the earliest installation #1,  so that
     the last "Test number" on your form represents the total
     number of installations your company has made since January
     1,  1960.  If you wish to use another test number for your
     own reference, enter it in parenthesis below the sequential
     numbers.

 2.  Capacity - The capacity of the source will be presented in
     appropriate units (tons/day,  tons/heat,  or tons/hr.).   The
     capacity reported will be the design capacity for the piece
     of source equipment or the maximum design condition for the
     collector.

 3.  Type of raw material or charge - The composition of the raw
     material or charge will be presented on a percent by weight
     basis.

-------
 INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC
Summary of Data
- 3 -
8/8/70
 4.  Fuel Used - The type of fuel used in firing the source equip-
     ment will be presented.  Sulfur and ash contents for coal and
     oil will be reported.

 5.  Type collector and year placed in service - The type of
     collector will be described (i.e., - venturi- 30" W.G.,
     Fabric Filter - Orion bags, ESP - collector surface area)
     and the year placed in service will also be listed.

 6.  Gas Volume - The gas volume at the design capacity will be
     presented in acrual cubic feet per minute.  For the case of
     wet scrubbers, the capacity of the source should be reported
     in ACFM, and the capacity of the scrubber reported in ACFM
     saturated beneath the hot gas figure.

 7.  Temperature - The temperature at the collector inlet in °F
     will be presented.  Where a saturated gas volume is presented
     for a wet scrubber capacity, the saturation temperature should
     be given in parenthesis below the hot gas temperature.

 8.  Measured Grain Loading - The inlet and outlet grain loadings,
     at the collector,  measured by a source test,  will be presented
     in grains per ACF.

 9.  Design Efficiency - The design collection efficiency for the
     collector will be presented.  The measured or test efficiency
     of the collector,  calculated from the grain loadings in column
     8, should be entered in parenthesis below the Design Efficiency.

10.  Plume Visibility - Is plume visible after collection?  Answer
     yes or no.  If yes, an explanation as to % opacity,  time
     span, and process  step during which plume is  visible (i.e.,
     charging, melting, pouring), should be presented on the
     remarks sheet, and referenced in column 15. jtfLts^/b */••

11.  Particle size distribution and method - The particle size
     distribution and the method of measurement will be presented.

12.  Dust Resistivity and method of measurement -  The contractor
     shall present information on the dust resistivity (ohm - cm)
     and the temperature (°F) at which the measurement was made.
     The method of measurement,  laboratory or in situ,  shall also


-------
 INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING   INSTITUTE, INC.
Summary of Data
- 4 -
8/8/70
     be presented.   The dust resistivity measurement is applicable
     only to precipitator installations, but should be reported,
     if known,  regardless of the type  of collector installed.

13.  Chemical composition of particles - The chemical composition
     of the particles on a percent by  weight basis shall be pre-
     sented.

14.  Chemical composition of gas stream - The chemical composition
     of the gas stream on a percent by volume basis shall be
     presented.

15.  Any remarks which might serve to  clarify or enhance the value
     of the reported data should be presented on a separate sheet
     with reference numbers indicated  in column 15.  For example,
     a mechanical collector is  frequently included in a scrubber
     or filter application.  This pertinent fact should be clearly
     indicated in the "remarks".
LCH:js
       Addendum:

          Item No.  10:   For wet  scrubbers only:
               If the plume appears  to consist x^holly
               of condensed water vapor, answer "no"
               in column 10,  and note in the remarks
               that there was a  visible steam plume.

-------
                                                TABLE  I  page  2        SOURCE:
to
8
OUPWIAKI LIT 11NO1 ALLiAl 1UJN JJ J\ 1 t\
CD
TEST
NO.






(ID
PARTICLE
SIZE
*L
<






>






WT.%
IN
RANGE






METHOD
OF
ANALYSIS






(12)
RESISTIVITY
OHM- CM
RESIST.






TEMP . F






METHOD
OF
ANALYSIS






(13)
CHEMICAL
COMP. OF
PARTICLES
COMP .






WT.%






(14)
CHEMICAL
COMP. OF
GAS
COMP .






VOL.1






(15)
REMARKS
NOTE
5






5.  Remarks which might serve  to  clarify  or  enhance  the value  of  the  reported data should be

-------
                                                TABLE I              SOURCE:

                                      SUMMARY OF INSTALLATION DATA
(1)
TEST
NO.






(2)
CAP.
OF
UNIT






(3)
TYPE OF RAW l
MATERIAL OR
CHARGE






(4)
FUEL2
USED






(5)
TYPE3
COLLECTOR






(Sa)
YEAR
PLACED
IN
SERVICE






(6)
GAS
VOLUME
ACFM






(7)
INLET
TEMP.
°F






(8a) (8b)
MEASURED
DUST LOADING
GR/ACF
INLET






OUTLET






(9)
DESIGN
EFF.
WT. %






(10)
IS4
PLUME
VISIBLE






1.
2.
3.
4.
ro
oo
co
The composition of the raw material or charge should be presented on a wt.% basis.
The type of fuel used in firing should be presented. Report sulfur and ash content of coal.
Describe^ the type of collector. Examples: Venturi-30" w.  c.jFabric Filter, Orion BagsjESP, Area.
Is the plume visible after collection? Answer yes or no here.  If yes, an explanation as to time

-------
INDUSTRIAL  GAS CLEANING INSTITUTE, INC.

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS CLEANING  INSTITUTE, INC
                         APPENDIX VII
                      List of IGCI Publications

-------
INDUSTRIAL  GAS CLEANING INSTITUTE, INC

-------
INDUSTRIAL   GAS  CLEANING    INSTITUTE,  INC
                                   APPENDIX  VII
                           LIST  OF  IGCI  PUBLICATIONS
       "Test Procedure for Gas Scrubbers"                             (WS-1)

       "Terminology for Electrostatic Precipitators"                     (E-P 1)

       "Procedure for Determination of Velocity and Gas Flow Rate"
            (Electrostatic Precipitators Div.)                            (E-P 2)

       "Criteria for Performance Guarantee Determinations"
            (Electrostatic Precipitators Div.)                            (E-P 3)

       "Evaluation Bid Form" (Electrostatic Precipitators Div.)           (E-P 4)

       "Information Required for the Preparation of Bidding
            Specifications for Electrostatic Precipitators"                (E-P 5)

       "Pilot Electrostatic Precipitators"                               (E-P 6)

       "Gas Flow Model  Studies"                                      (E-P 7)

       "Cyclonic Mechanical Dust Collector Criteria"
            (Mechanical Collectors Div.)                                (M-2)

       "Gravity, Louver and Dynamic Mechanical Collector Criteria"      (M-3)

       "Gaseous Emissions Equipment:  Product Definitions and
            Illustrations" (Gaseous Control Div.)                       (G-1)

       "Fundamentals of Fabric Collectors and Glossary of Terms"        (F-2)

       "Operation and Maintenance of Fabric Collectors"                (F-3)

-------