United States
                Environmental Protection
                Agency	
Office of Health
and Environmental Assessment
Washington. DC 20460	
                Research and Development
EPA/600/S6-91/004 Sep. 91
EPA       Project Summary
                Development  of  Risk
                Assessment  Methodology for
                Municipal Sludge  Incineration
                 This Is one of a series of reports that
                present  methodologies for assessing
                the potential risks to humans or other
                organisms from management practices
                for the disposal  or reuse of municipal
                sewage sludge. The management prac-
                tices addressed  by this series Include
                land application  practices, distribution
                and marketing programs, landfllllng, In-
                cineration  and ocean disposal. In par-
                ticular, these reports deal  with meth-
                ods for evaluating potential health and
                environmental risks from toxic chemi-
                cals that may be  present In sludge.
                This document  addresses  risks from
                chemicals  associated with sludge In-
                cineration  practices.
                 These proposed risk assessment pro-
                cedures are designed as tools to assist
                In the development of regulations for
                sludge management practices. The pro-
                cedures are structured to allow calcu-
                lation of technical criteria  for sludge
                disposal/reuse options based  on the
                potential for adverse health or environ-
                mental Impacts. The criteria may ad-
                dress management practices (such as
                site design or process control specifi-
                cations), limits on sludge disposal rates
                or limits on toxic chemical concentra-
                tions In  the sludge.
                  This Project Summary was developed
                by EPA's  Environmental Criteria and
                Assessment Office, Cincinnati, OH, to
                announce  key findings of the research
                project  that  Is fully documented In  a
                separate report  of the same title (see
                Project  Report ordering Information at
                back).
Introduction
  Sludge incineration involves the com-
bustion of sludge within a mechanically
controlled environment. Incineration is a
treatment method used before disposal or
reuse  of the ash.  Because incineration
drastically reduces the volume and mass
of sludge, it has been traditionally consid-
ered a disposal method similar to landfilling
and ocean dumping. Land applications (in-
cluding distribution  and marketing of
sludge) are considered use options, since
in these cases  beneficial properties of
sludge are utilized.
  Currently, only three types of incinera-
tion technology  are employed for dedi-
cated  sludge  combustion in the United
States:

    1. Multiple-hearth furnace (MHF);
    2. Fluidized-bed (FB) furnace; and
    3. Infrared electric furnace.

  Uniform feed of sludge is critical to the
satisfactory operation of incineration sys-
tems.  Realization of uniform feed requires
good control of sludge thickening, blend-
ing, sludge age control and pumping be-
fore dewatering.  If these tasks are man-
aged and maintained properly and the de-
watering equipment is operated correctly,
the output of  the dewatering equipment
will be uniform. A variation of ±10% of the
selected feed  rate over 8 hours is accept-
able. Uniform  feed assures stable opera-
tion and prevents upsets that could lead
to excessive emissions.
  Virtually all  incinerators currently oper-
ating in the United States are equipped

-------
with wet scrubbers for emission control.
The wide variety of wet scrubbers in use
includes fixed and variable-throat Venturi
impingement plates and  cyclonic scrub-
bers.   Most sludge incinerators, particu-
larly those  built in the  last  10 years, are
equipped  with variable-throat  Venturi
scrubber  units  and  an  impingement
subcooling  tray separator.  Over 70% of
the incinerators installed  since 1978 are
equipped  with  combination  Venturi/im-
pingement tray scrubbers.

Identification of Key Pathways
  The air emissions, ash residue (wet or
dry) and scrubber water represent the
major pathways by which pollutants enter
the environment and potentially affect hu-
man health. The  air emissions pathway
begins with the paniculate  and gaseous
emissions generated by  the  combustion
process. These emissions pass through a
wet scrubbing air  pollution control system
that reduces the paniculate and gaseous
pollutant concentrations  in the exhaust gas.
There are several regulatory programs that
exercise control over air  pollutants emit-
ted from sludge incineration processes.
  Municipal sludge incineration  in  well-
operated facilities  produces an odorless
ash weighing between 30 and 60% of the
weight  of the original  sludge on a dry
basis.  Municipal wastewater plants in the
United States generate about 72 million
dry tons of sludge each year. Approxi-
mately 2 million tons of this are inciner-
ated,  resulting in  approximately 700,000
tons of ash that must finally be disposed
of in an environmentally compatible man-
ner.
  The scrubber water  is usually treated
separately by flocculation and sedimenta-
tion to reduce its solids content. Residue
produced during scrubber water treatment
may be dewatered  and disposed of with
the incinerator ash.  Treated scrubber wa-
ter effluent  after solids  removal is almost
universally   recycled back through  the
wastewater treatment plant influent.
Overview of Method
  The greatest concern associated with
air emissions from incinerators is the po-
tential public health risk associated with
the inhalation of airborne gases and par-
ticles.  Certain emitted  contaminants  are
suspected human  carcinogens, and oth-
ers can exert  other acute or chronic ef-
fects.  Thus, incinerator air emissions are
selected as the critical  pathway in evalu-
ating the human health risk from the sludge
incineration process.
  The resulting methodology was devel-
oped considering the following:

  1. Identify the human health and envi-
ronmental impacts  and exposures consid-
ered acceptable.

  2. Define the human population exposed
to the ground  level  ambient concentra-
tions for representative facilities.

  3. Define, for the  air exposure route,
the maximum allowable daily and  annual
ground level concentrations of the pollut-
ants of concern that will satisfy the health
and exposure criteria in Step 1.

  4. Define the stack modeling character-
istics, such as stack height, exit diameter,
gas fbw, gas temperature, and meteorol-
ogy for selected model plants.

  5. Select the appropriate air dispersion
model(s) for the models/plants and calcu-
late the emission  rates associated  with
the acceptable ambient concentrations.

  6. Calculate allowable sludge concen-
trations and  mass  loadings for the pollut-
ants of concern.

Exposure and Assessment of
Health Effects
  Two approaches for exposure  health
assessment  may be performed  by this
methodology: an aggregate risk approach
and the most exposed individual (MEI)
approach; the  human  exposure  model
(HEM) assesses aggregate risk.
  The U.S. EPA's  Office of Air  Qu*>lu-
Planning and Standards' Pollutant As
ment Branch has developed a huma
posure  model.   The  impact parameters
(exposure, hazard and risk) are the basis
of the HEM computations of the individual
and  community health effects resulting
from  the emissions of chemical species.
These concepts are defined as follows:
  Population — The number of  persons
in contact with the concentration.
  Exposure — The population multiplied
by the concentration.
  Carcinogenic Potency — This  param-
eter  is quantified by the unit risk  factor,
the probability of developing cancer due
to continuous exposure to 1  ug/m3 of the
species over a 70-year lifetime.
  Hazard — Concentration  multiplied by
the unit risk factor.
  Risk — Exposure multiplied by the unit
risk factor.
  The human  exposure  model uses  a
finely detailed  national census data base
to compute the impact parameters of ex-
posure and dose. The resulting risk pat-
terns are dependent not only on concen-
tration but also on population patterns.
  The degree of contaminant exposure to
individuals residing in an area where emis-
sions from a municipal sludge incinerator
exist depends upon the following: the '<••-
ration of exposure;  the volume  of  a
haled; the particle size distribution  ft
cinerator emissions; the  annual average
contaminant concentrations; and the num-
ber of people exposed.
  The most exposed  individual (MEI) is
assumed to reside in the area of the maxi-
mum annual ground  level concentration
and  is  exposed 24  hours  a  day. The
incinerator(s) will be assumed to  be op-
erational for the life of the individual (70
years) and to  be operating  100%  of the
time.   The 70-year exposure is a valid
estimate since sludge  incinerators are ex-
pected to be operational  indefinitely.  A
reference air concentration (RAC)  is cal-
culated as the maximum concentration that
the MEI will be permitted to be exposed to
for any particular contaminant.

-------
 Norm Kowal is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
 The complete report, entitled "Development of Risk Assessment Methodology for
   Municipal Sludge Incineration," (Order No. PB91- 228114/AS; Cost: $23.00, subject
   to change) will be available onty from:
         National Technical Information Service
         5285 Port Royal Road
         Springfield, VA 22161
         Telephone: 703-487-4650
 The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
         Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office
         U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
         Cincinnati, OH 45268
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Center for Environmental
Research Information
Cincinnati, OH 45268
      BULK RATE
POSTAGE & FEES PAID
         EPA
   PERMIT No. G-35
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300

-------