United States
                Environmental Protection
                Agency
Office of Health and
Environmental Assessment
Washington DC 20460
                Research and Development
EPA/600/S6-91/006Jan. 1992
EPA       Project Summary
                Preliminary  Risk Assessment for
                Bacteria  in Municipal  Sewage
                Sludge  Applied  to Land
                  Section 405 of the Clean Water Act
                requires the U.S. Environmental Protec-
                tion Agency to develop and issue regu-
                lations that identify: (1) uses for sludge
                Including disposal, (2) specific factors
                (Including costs) to be taken into ac-
                count in determining the measures and
                practices applicable for  each use  or
                disposal,  and (3) concentrations of pol-
                lutants that interfere with each use or
                disposal.  To comply with this mandate,
                the U.S. EPA has embarked on a pro-
                gram  to develop four  major technical
                regulations: land application, including
                distribution and marketing; landfilling;
                incineration; and surface disposal. The
                development of these technical regula-
                tions requires a consideration of patho-
                gens as well as chemical constituents
                of sludge. Public concern related to the
                reuse and disposal of municipal sludge
                often  focuses on the  Issue of patho-
                genic organisms.
                  This report is one of a series whose
                purpose is to use the methodology de-
                scribed in Pathogen Risk Assessment
                for Land Application of Municipal Sludge
                (EPA/600/6-90/002a,b) to  develop pre-
                liminary assessments of risk to human
                health posed by parasites, bacteria, and
                viruses in municipal sewage sludge ap-
                plied to land as fertilizer or soil condi-
                tioner. The preliminary risk assessment
                includes a description of the most criti-
                cal data gaps that must be filled before
                development of a definitive risk assess-
                ment, and recommends research priori-
                ties.
                  This Project Summary was devel-
                oped  by  EPA's Environmental Criteria
 and Assessment Office, Cincinnati, OH,
 to announce key findings of the research
 project that Is fully documented in a
 separate report of the same title (see
 Project Report ordering information at
 back).

 Introduction
    This preliminary risk assessment study
 focuses on the probability of human infec-
 tion from enteric bacterial  pathogens in
 municipal sludge applied to land. It is based
 on the Pathogen Risk Assessment com-
 puter model and methodology described in
 Pathogen Risk Assessment for Land Ap-
 plication of Municipal Sludge.
    This document reports the results of a
 literature review designed to find the data
 on pathogenic bacteria required  by  the
 pathogen's  methodology, and the results
 of numerous site-specific computer simu-
 lations,  running the Pathogen Risk As-
 sessment Model with a wide range of values
 for the parameters required. The  param-
 eters required for bacteria are (1) minimum
 infective dose; (2) density of viable bacte-
 ria in treated sludge destined for land  ap-
 plication; (3) die-off  rates  in soil,  dry
 particulates, liquid aerosols, and water; and
 (4) dispersion in the environment, i.e., trans-
 port in water, soil, and air.

 Procedure
    Six sites were chosen to provide diver-
 sity in  geographic  location,  topography,
 soil type, rainfall pattern, and temperature.
 Locations selected for site-specific appli-
 cation  of the  model include Anderson
 County, TN; Chaves County, NM; Clinton

-------
County, IA; Highlands County, FL; Kern
County, CA; and Yakima County, WA.
   An  initial sensitivity analysis was per-
formed  using site-specific parameters for
Site  1, Anderson County, TN. Main pro-
gram variables used in the model run were
varied over a range of values to determine
the sensitivity of the model to variations in
conditions. In general, the default value of
a given parameter was compared with a
reasonable higher and a reasonable lower
value, where the high and low values were
taken from available literature or estimated
when literature values were not available.
   In this analysis, it is assumed that bac-
teria are transported into  subsurface soil
and  subsequently  into groundwater and
are included in any droplet aerosols formed
by spray  application, as well  as  in any
paniculate aerosols formed by disturbance
of the soil by wind or by cultivation. It is
also  assumed that the bacteria die  at a
characteristic rate that depends  on the
ambient temperature and the  medium  in
which they are found.

Conclusions
   The risk of  infection  from bacterial
pathogens in treated sewage  sludge ap-
pears to be small when judged by model
results,  but there are a number of factors
the  model does  not  address, including
regrowth  in composted or D&M  sludge.
The  model runs indicated that significant
exposures are likely only if the number of
organisms is very high, either because the
concentration of bacteria in the  treated
sludge is unrealistically high or because a
high  application rate is used.  Significant
exposures occurred only onsite, either by
direct contact or by swimming in  a pond
containing runoff. However, runoff and sur-
face  transport of bacterial pathogens  to
the onsite pond do  not appear to present a
major health risk. Exposure by  direct con-
tact  immediately after  sludge  application
could be a source of infection, although
the risk of  infection  decreases very rapidly,
so that the cumulative risk of infection from
a single application is typically only slightly
higher than the maximum daily risk. The
results suggest that if the infective dose is
>20, the probability of infection becomes
minimal.
   The results of the model  runs clearly
indicate that the highest risk of  infection
should occur during and immediately after
application of the sludge. Die-off and dilu-
tion  by soil should subsequently reduce
the number of infectious organisms very
rapidly. Aside from the  expected depen-
dence of  exposure on  total  numbers  of
pathogens present and the infectious dose,
the most  significant effects on exposure
appear to be related to die-off rates and to
dry particulate aerosol formation. Fractional
transfers of pathogens from soil to subsoil
and to soil surface water were also signifi-
cant, as was the volume of the onsite pond
in which the contaminated soil surface wa-
ter was diluted.
   The results described above do not
support the requirement for an extended
waiting period before  use  of  sludge-
amended soils. Bacterial concentrations in
all of the  exposure media decreased so
rapidly that a waiting period of a few days
at most should be sufficiently protective.
However,  compost and D&M sludge  prod-
ucts designed  for use in  the home garden
can allow multiplication or regrowth of bac-
teria, such as  Salmonella, resulting in ex-
tremely variable pathogen  densities and
the possibility  of a higher dose of patho-
gens upon ingestion of crops.

Recommendations
   The following information is needed  to
improve the usefulness of the Pathogen
Risk Assessment Model and to allow for
more reliable  risk assessment of land ap-
plication of sewage sludge:
     Simple  and accurate standardized
     methods for quantifying, by species
     and  strain, pathogenic bacteria  in
     treated sludge destined for land ap-
     plication, in final distributed and mar-
     keted (D&M) sludge products, and in
     environmental media;
 •   Improved understanding of minir
     infective doses, particularly low-di
     effects and MIDs for sensitive sub-
     jects;
     Additional information on regrowth of
     bacteria in compost and D&M sludge,
     including factors enhancing or limit-
     ing regrowth;
     More accurate survival and transport
     data on all  pathogenic bacteria  of
     major concern in sludge, especially
     retardation coefficients for. transport
     of bacteria in saturated soil;
     Development of an index of soil types
     that would correlate capacity for sol-
     ute transport and suitability for sludge
     application (also valuable for onsite
     waste disposal or solid  waste dis-
     posal);
 •   Research  on subsurface injection  of
     sludge and the relative probability of
     bacterial transport  in groundwater;
     and
     Epidemiologic studies  evaluating
     whether there  is a  correlation be-
     tween bacterial infections (not nec-
     essarily disease)  and bacterial
     aerosols.
   Future modifications of the Pathogen
Risk Assessment Model that may improve
its accuracy include the following:
     The  model  should  be  changec
     consider runoff of pathogens fa.
     unincorporated sludge  when rainfall
     occurs in the first 24 hours.
     A  transfer factor could be added  to
     the model to allow for  redistribution
     of pathogens from subsurface to sur-
     face soil when the field is plowed.
     For  a  better description of sludge
     use on public parks and golf courses,
     which are  more likely to have ponds,
     it might be beneficial to add the op-
     tion for existence of a pond onsite.
     The  limits  of  Subroutine  RAINS
     should be further characterized  to
     establish operating  boundaries  for
     input variables.

-------
   Norm Kowal is the EPA Project Officer, (see below).
   The complete report, entitled "Preliminary Risk Assessment for Bacteria in Municipal
     Sewage Sludge Applied to Land," (Order No. PB92-126820/AS; Cost: $35.00, subject
     to change) will be available only from:
           National Technical Information Service
           5285 Port Royal Road
           Springfield,  VA 22161
           Telephone: 703-487-4650
   The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
           Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office
           U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
           Cincinnati, OH 45268
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati, OH 45268
      BULK RATE
POSTAGE & FEES PAID
 EPA PERMIT NO. G-35
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300


-------