Report on Air Quality Criteria for
Oxides (AP-50) and Revised Chapter
Air Quality Criteria for Sulfur Ox
Effects of Sulfur Oxides in the At

-------
 Report on Air Quality Criteria for Sulfur Oxides (AP-50)
and Revised Chapter 5 for Air Quality Criteria for Sulfur
  Oxides, Effects of Sulfur Oxides in the Atmosphere on
               Vegetation (EPA-R3-73-030)
                             A
                       Report to the
                       United States
              Environmental Protection Agency
                          by the
     National Air Quality Criteria Advisory Committee
                          of the
                  Science Advisory Board
                  Science Advisory Board
           U. S. Environmental Protection Agency

-------
                           EPA NOTICE







     This report has been written as part of the activities of the




Agency Science Advisory Board, a public advisory group providing




extramural scientific information to the Administrator and other




officials of the Environmental Projection Agency.  The Board is




structured to provide a balanced expert assessment of scientific




matters related to problems facing the Agency.  This report has not




been reviewed for approval by the Agency and hence its contents do not




represent the views and policies of the Environmental Protection





-------
Report on "Air Quality Criteria for Sulfur Oxides" (AP-50)  and
Revised Chapter 5, Effects of Sulfur Oxides in the Atmosphere
on Vegetation (EPA-R3-030)
                          Summary Comments


     It is the Committee's considered opinion that the Sulfur Oxides

criteria document is in serious need of revision and that such a revision

is not only desirable, but necessary.

     It is vital that sulfur dioxide and particulate matter be dealt with

in a manner which takes full account of their simultaneous presence in

the ambient air.  There is ample evidence from atmospheric chemistry,

toxicology, and epidemiology to support this thesis.  On the other hand,

certain criteria may apply to particulate matter which are totally

unrelated to interaction with sulfur dioxide.  As examples one might cite

the known carcinogenic potential of certain components of Total Suspended

Particulates (TSP) or the fact that formaldehyde and other gaseous

pollutants can also associate with particulate material.  It is vital

that these aspects receive proper recognition.

     The Committee recommends that the Sulfur Oxides criteria document be

revised and reissued as Air Quality Criteria for Sulfur Oxides and

Associated Particulates and that the criteria document for Particulate

Matter be revised and reissued as such.

-------
                    Comments on Specific Chapters
Chapter 1  -  Physical and Chemical Properties and the Atmospheric

              Reactions of the Oxides of Sulfur
     One omission from this chapter is a discussion of the biological


sources of sulfur compounds in the atmosphere and their subsequent


oxidation.  The initial portions dealing with the physical and chemical


properties of sulfur dioxide and sulfates seem fairly straightforward.


Our knowledge of the theory of conversion of sulfur dioxide to sulfate


under various conditions is unfortunately still limited,  but this


section should be updated.


     The conversion of sulfur dioxide to sulfate is obviously of major


importance.  The rate at which this takes place in the free atmosphere


cannot be predicted by extrapolations of laboratory measurements.  The


reason is that the atmosphere has a vast variety of trace contaminants


that have an influence on the rate of oxidation of sulfur dioxide and


the rate in the gaseous form is slower than the rate when in a solution


with trace metals (i.e., in a droplet).   There have been  a number of
     /

recent elaborate studies in which a downwind network observes the


chemical changes as the polluted air passes through it (for example,


Dana et al, J.G.R., 80, 4119-429, 1975).  There have also been studies


related to formation and growth of sulfate particles.  There is need
                                                                     o

to update and summarize the recent findings.

-------
     The recent work of Hansen and Eatough at Brigham Young University




indicating that sulfur dioxide can form stable sulfite complexes with




certain metals such as copper and ferric iron should be mentioned in




connection with the potential atmospheric reactions of sulfur dioxide.




     An important point to emphasize is the growing significance of




regional air pollution, and here the continued "aging" of the sulfur




dioxide-sulfate mixture needs to be considered.  This is hardly touched




on here, though it is an issue in the entire eastern United States and




in most parts of Europe — in fact, the regional burden may have an




overall practical significance that is as great as the local effects




downwind from major sources, since more people and activities are affected.




The recent SAPRAC (Statewide Air Pollution Research Center, University




of California) Study in the Los Angeles Basin, the EPA St.  Louis Study




and others should be discussed.




     Because the atmospheric reactions of the sulfur oxides have




considerable bearing on their potential irritant effects, that point




should be indicated here and cross referenced to the later  chapter




(Chapter 6) concerned with toxicology.  Neither atmospheric chemistry




nor toxicology exists in a vacuum.  As far as possible, the point of a




criteria document should be to put it all together and correlate




information from the several disciplines difficult though this may be.




Anyone who reads Chapter 1 should come away with the feeling for how




important these atmospheric reactions are and why they are  so important.

-------
     The discussion of effects of sulfur oxides on light transmission




in the atmosphere seems to have more emphasis than is warranted.   The




main points could be made more succinctly and the interested reader




referred to the literature for details.  There is recent work,  such as




that of Charlson ejt ai, which will update the subject.




     The alleged good correlation between SC>2 and visibility as determined




by sulfate particles needs clarification.  Presumably this would be true




in a given location under similar weather conditions, but as the sample




ages, more and more of the 502 will convert to sulfate, so this cannot be




generalized as is done here (Figure 1-5) without any qualifying remarks.

-------
Chapter 2  -  Sources and Methods of Measurement of Sulfur Oxides  in
              the Atmosphere
     This chapter should be separated into two chapters,  one of which

discusses the sources of sulfur pollution and the other of which

discusses the methods of measurement and characterization.

     One deficiency here is the virtual absence of any mention of natural

sources of sulfur oxides.  One should view the manmade contributions in

the light .of the natural background.  Natural sources are currently

about twice as large on a global basis as the anthropogenic ones

(Kellogg et al., Science 175:587-596, 1972).   The forms in which the

natural sulfur is added (HoS, CS2, (CH^^S etc.) is also of interest and

there are some interactions between human acitvity and the biological

sources as when sewage enhances the production of sulfurous gases from

rivers, lakes, and estuaries.

     Section B  -  Sources of Atmospheric Sulfur Oxides

     Contamination of the atmosphere by sulfur dioxide is a problem common

to many densely populated urban areas.  In such cases, low level sources

which are dispersed throughout the area are usually the emitters of

major sources.  However, when the concern is secondary products of

sulfur dioxide, in particular, sulfuric acid and acid sulfates, then

emissions by point sources become an important consideration.  The role

played by emissions from point sources at elevated heights as precursors

of these particulate pollutants should be discussed in considerable detail.

-------
Therefore, categorizing sources strictly "from the viewpoint of their




annual production" is misleading when presented without qualification.




     Summaries of emissions of sulfur dioxide by source types for major




cities such as New York and Chicago would be informative.  There should




also be included a discussion of the effect of control laws on sulfur




dioxide emissions since the data presented in Table 2-1.  Again,




a breakout of data for urban areas should prove interesting.




     With respect to measurement methods, many new advances have been




made since the publication of the criteria document.  A 1973 paper by




Hollowell e_t al., (Anal. Chem. 45:63A-72A) summarizes current instrumentation




for continuous monitoring of S02-  A more recent Analytical Chemistry




update may be available.  The 1974 NIOSH criteria document on SC^ has a




brief summary of environmental monitoring methods.  Lodgson and Carter




(Env. Sci. Technol. j):1172-1174, 1975) have compared manual and automated




methods for SCv in manually impinged 24 hour-ambient air samples.  The




activities of ASTM's Project Threshold in collaboratively testing ASTM




Method D2914 for SC>2 also deserve mention.  This study established the




sensitivity, accuracy, and precision of the method.  (Foster and Beatty,




Report to ASTM from Battelle, Columbus Lab., September 21, 1973).




     Section C  -  Measurement of Gaseous Sulfur Dioxide Concentrations




     1.  Sampling Techniques




         This section needs expansion.  More specific criteria should be




presented for the design and operation of sampling probes and manifolds.




The statement in the last sentence that continuous monitoring is




necessary to show diurnal changes is not exactly correct.  Even when data

-------
from continuous monitors are used to show diurnal variations,  they




are most often converted to hourly averages.   The same data can be




obtained by intermittent sampling over 1-hour periods.




     2.  Colorimetric Method




         Probably the most important addition to this Chapter  will be




a discussion about the stability of West-Gaeke samples on standing




at different temperatures.  For field monitoring use of the West-Gaeke




method leaves much to be desired when the operation involves,  as it




often does, transporting or mailing of solutions to a central  laboratory




for analysis.  A detailed analysis and discussion of these problems must




be added to the criteria document's treatment of the official  reference




method.




     3.  Conductometric Methods




         These methods are non-specific and not very useful at low




concentrations whenever any other potentially ionic species are present.




The caveat that "one must take special precautions to eliminate other




pollutants which could affect the conductivity of the solution" is




misleading because there often is no feasible manner in which  this can




be accomplished without also removing the sulfur dioxide.




     4.  Acid Titration Method:  Hydrogen Peroxide




         This method is safer to use without a filter because  filters can




remove some of the sulfur dioxide.  Where possibilities of interference




can be discounted or neglected the peroxide method has very desirable




features.

-------
     5.  Spectroscopic Methods




         An instrument based upon second derivative spectroscopy can




detect 10 ppb of sulfur dioxide.  One model can monitor S0£,  NO, N02 and




03 sequentially.  In principle, this procedure is very attractive and




the sensitivity for sulfur dioxide is satisfactory.




     6.  Other Methods




           Fluorescence




           A method has been developed which uses the fluorescence




excited in sulfur dioxide by zinc 213.8 nm or cadmium 228.8 nm (Okabe




e_t al. 1973) .   The intensity of fluorescence is linearly dependent on




the sulfur dioxide concentration.  Water, carbon disulfide, nitric




oxide and ethylene are interferences.




           Flame Photometry




           Sulfur-containing compounds burned in a hydrogen-rich flame




produce a luminescence in the near ultraviolet which can be correlated




to the atmospheric concentration of the compounds.  If other sulfur




compounds are present in small enough concentrations, this method




can be used for a very effective sulfur dioxide monitor.




           Gas Chromatography  -  Flame Photometry




           The lack of selectivity of the flame photometric detector




can be circumvented by preliminary gas chromatographic separation of




such compounds as hydrogen sulfide and methyl mercaptan.  This can be




effected and still maintain satisfactory sensitivity for sulfur-dioxide.

-------
           Ampetrometry

           One method involves absorption of sulfur dioxide in an

acidified bromide solution in which bromine is electrolytically

generated.  The reaction between bromine and sulfur dioxide is kept at

an endpoint condition by automatic means.  The current required to

produce the bromine is measured and used as the indication of the

concentration of sulfur dioxide.

           Electrochemical Analyzers

           The sulfur dioxide diffuses through a membrane into an

electrochemical cell at a rate proportional to the concentration of the

gas.  The instrument measures the current generated in the electrochemical

cell as a result of the introduction of sulfur dioxide.

     7.  Use and Comparison of Methods

         Since the criteria document was written, considerable

experience in the field has been obtained by EPA and many local agencies

in monitoring sulfur dioxide.  If the revised document is to have any

value as a guide.to measuring sulfur dioxide then a thorough review of

this experience should be summarized.  The proper use of the West-Gaeke

method and its relationship to other methods should be given primary

attention.
     Section E  -  Other Methods of Measuring Pollution by Sulfur
                   Oxide

     1.  Sulfation Rates of Lead Peroxide Candles


-------
could be considerably shortened.   For the sake of scientific  accuracy




the fact that lead peroxide is not a peroxide and is more  properly lead




dioxide should be mentioned.

-------
Chapter 3  -  Atmospheric Concentrations of Sulfur Oxides







     Since the most recent data in this section are ten years old,




it is obviously in need of updating.  This would be especially




necessary in the area of sulfuric acid and sulfates in relation to




sulfur dioxide.




     The vast amounts of data which' have accumulated since the criteria




document was written should be reviewed and summarized in this chapter.




Important items which should be featured are:




     (1)  Trends showing decrease in ambient concentrations as control




          programs were instituted in various cities and states.




     (2)  Discussion of tall stack point source impacts versus area




          source impact.




     (3)  Validity of various monitoring data sets in view of present




          knowledge about measurement problems.




     (4)  Comparison of trends shown by ambient sulfur dioxide and




          sulfates at locations where both measurements were made.




     The subject of regional air pollution and acidity of rainwater is




one on which much data has accumulated since the publication of the




initial document.  It is certainly a subject of importance and it should




be dealt with in a separate chapter on transport and deposition of




pollutants over large distances.  This should include a discussion of




the potential effects on ecosystems.

-------
Chapter 4  -  Effects of Sulfur Oxides in the Atmosphere on Materials







     In general, the evidence cited in this chapter pertains to S02




levels in the atmosphere which far exceed current levels.  On this




basis, the chapter may tend to overestimate the existing situation.




     The material in this chapter must be used with caution and




requires additional information in order to draw inferences about the




economic effects of pollutants on materials.

-------
Chapter 5  -'  Effects of Sulfur Oxides in the Atmosphere on Vegetation







     The Revised Chapter 5 on "Effects of Sulfur Oxides in the




Atmosphere on Vegetation" in the Air Quality Criteria for Sulfur Oxides




(EPA-23-73-030, dated September 1973) has been carefully reviewed.




     In general:  (a) the document drew together a mass of information




available in several hundred publications through 1972 and, for the




most part, the interpretations are soundly conceived; (b) there have been




significant advances during the intervening years giving more depth in




several areas and leading to other interpretations, so we feel a revised




issue would be justified: and (c) the composition and presentation  of




ideas are extremely awkward at many points and sometimes very difficult




to interpret so a complete rewriting of the document is recommended.




One may gather perspective for this idea by carefully examining the fine




review by I. Ziegler (1975), The effect of S02 pollution on plant




metabolism.  Residue Reviews 56: 79-105.  This reveals the tremendous




strides made in our knowledge on the mechanisms of action of different




sulfur compounds and the biochemical effects on different plants.




     There is a significant growing body of knowledge on the sensitivity




of different cultivars and native plants, on the interaction to mixtures




of air pollutants, the effect of ecological conditions on the biochemical




and physical response of plants to exposure, upon the secondary effects




such as winter hardiness, effects of acid rains on ecosystems and




response to plant pathogens and insect pests.  Each of these subjects

-------
ought to be brought down to date.   The tabulation  of  sensitive  species




should be carefully examined with  an idea of adding new data  and  the




stages of maximum sensitivity and  showing the cultivars used.




     Specific sections and suggestions for editing at crucial points:




     Page 1, A.  General.  The review by Ziegler 1975  probably should be




included.  Either here or later, reference should be made to the significant




new developments such as effects on lichens, beneficial and harmful




effects from acid rains, the potential for long range ecological  changes




and impact on ecosystems, biochemical mechanisms and  interaction  of




pollutant mixtures.  Delete (in paragraph 3) such  trite and meaningless




statements as "based on both professional and scientific judgments."




Can you have one without the other?




     B.  Paragraph 1.  "pigmented  foliar patterns" might be changed to




"visible effects appear as necrotic zones or changes  in color either




by chlorosis or unusual pigment development."  The subtle effects are




defined redundantly.  Why not say  "Subtle effects  are biochemical or




physiological changes that do not  lead to tissue destruction or visible




changes but may adversely affect orderly development"?




     B. 1 - Paragraph 1.  It says  "Acute injury is severe injury  that




occurs within a few hours	etc."  The real meaning is that "Acute




injury is visible damage in the form of necrosis or pigment changes




that occur after brief exposure to the toxicant."

-------
     B. 1 last sentence.  Visual SC>2 symptoms or visible?  Why not say,




"The outstanding acute symptoms have been accurately illustrated in




three colored pictorial atlases (12-14) for the more susceptible




species"?  Likewise, B. 1, a paragraph 2 is a miserable statement.  The




bleached and necrotic areas occur on both monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous




plants but are frequently restrained to the interveinal areas so they may




appear as streaks on the former and irregular blotches on the latter.




On both there can be marginal or tip necrosis distributed according to




the stage of development of the foliage at the time of exposure.




     On page 2 under 2 - Subtle effects, there is equally poor, almost




meaningless composition.  "Processes are molecular or microscopic in




nature."  Why not say:  ''By definition the subtle effects are changes




in one or more biochemical mechanisms essential to the plants' welfare




without visible mechanical changes in the outward appearance of the




plant during the period of exposure.  If the subtle effect persists long




enough so food manufacture, storage and conversion into energy and




cellular structures are impaired, there may be an eventual reduction in




growth and productivity."




     Page 3.  Katz  (9) would be improved by specifying duration of




exposure.  The reference to Arndt 35 likewise has a time-dosage frame.




     Page 4, paragraph 2.  Does extreme sensitivity of Bel W tobacco




pertain to photochemical oxidants especially ozone rather than to SC^?




This point should be checked.  Omit discussion in same paragraph on




radish roots or rewrite it, "Observation that root production was




suppressed in radish by exposure to 131 to 160  g/M^ (0.05 to 0.06 ppm)




for 40 hours in each of five weeks could not be confirmed according to




Tingey et al. (30)."







-------
     Page 4, mechanism of action.   More recent  information is




available on oxidation of S02 to SO^ (see Ziegler,,89).




     Page 5, first sentence.  Should not reference  be made to  the




alleged increase in susceptibility to winter injury in  conifers from




exposure to SC>2?




     Page 5, last paragraph.  Brandt and Heck also  pointed out that others




had recommended withholding water during periods of exposure to SC>2,




but that they did not necessarily endorse the idea.




     Page 6, f.  This entire section should be rewritten to incorporate




various reports released in the past three years.  There are different




kinds of effects described from use of SO^ and combinations with 02, F, etc.




     Page 6, (2).  Genetic plasticity?  The various cultivars of crop




plants and naturally occurring biotypes differ appreciably in their




reaction to SOo.  Sometimes these differences may be as great as the




difference in reaction of different species of plants..." (broaden




examples).  There have been several recent publications in this subject




matter area (Shapiro and Brownman, 1972; Hayston and Miller, 1972;




Brandle and Ericman, 1973).




     Page 8, F.  There are many new references available on reaction




of lower organisms to S02 and the possible inference for ecosystems.




The reaction of roses to Diplocarpon was reported by James before




Saunders.

-------
     Page 9, G.  There have been more recent publications and more




comprehensive interpretations in this area than almost any other




pertaining to SC^ and NOX.  They cast more light on the SC>2 problem




than almost anything else so they should be reviewed in detail and




interpreted.




     Page 10, H,.1.  There are some beneficial effects from SQ2 presence




so this aspect might be balanced against the damage for other species




or in other soil conditions.




     Page 12, column 2, paragraph 2.  The relation of chlorotic dwarf




to conifer development in the presence of S02 is very vague as presented.




In paragraph 4 it is proper to point out that radish has been injured




by extremely high exposure in well conceived experiments, but is there




any evidence even in poorly conceived experiments that a reduction in




yield may occur  (see Ringley and Hecht, Beasley).  A critical review




is in order.




     Page 18, Alfalfa.  Is there a typographical error in that injury




of 5 and 19% is reported from identical treatments?




     Page 19, Table 5-6.  Should "injury" be defined more precisely as




"causing visible lesions and color changes on foliage"?  Do the examples




apply to minimum rather than maximum dose for symptom expression? The




trouble arises from the heading.  Suggest:  "Table 5-6.  Concentration of




SOo in air capable of causing visible lesions on species of agricultural




and forest plants after exposure for periods of one to eight hours."

-------
     Page 24.  What is a "threshold injury"?   Suggest  as  a  heading:




"Table 5-8.  Calculated threshold for S02  to  injure  plants  with  different




degrees of resistance after exposure for periods  in  the range  of 0.5  to




8.0 hours."




     Page 25, Table 5-9.  This table should be checked carefully to  see




if data have become available on additional species  or if any  of the




species now listed should be transferred to a new classification.




     Page 32, Summary.  The following is suggested as  the introductory




paragraphs.




     There are numerous conflicting reports on the damage to vegetation




by sulfur oxides.  This was inevitable because species, cultivars and




wild biotypes differ in their degrees of resistance, in their  susceptibility




during different stages of their development  and  to  the interaction




between the sulfur oxides and other pollutants and the ameliorating




effects of environmental conditions.  In addition, the sulfur  oxides




appear in different states of oxidation, as gases and  aerosol  acids




and differ in the rate at which they accumulate in the foliage and




become detoxified by conversion to relatively harmless sulfate ions.




In general, the environmental conditions that regulate stomatal  movement




or expedite differentiation of tissues and cuticularization of exposed




surfaces will modify the severity of symptoms in  a plant  at a  given  state




of physiological susceptibility.




     The response of plants may be based upon subtle physiological changes




by interference with the orderly biochemical  processes of the  cell.




Brief impact on these biochemical processes may not  have  an enduring  or




harmful effect on the growth and productivity of  the plant. However,

-------
if necessary intermediates are blocked or a vital process such as




photosynthesis, respiration or enzyme production is suppressed indefinitely,




there may be harmful effects that reduce the value of the plant to




mankind's needs, increase the plant's liability to damage by pest




attack or adverse environmental effects or intercede in the orderly




development and maturation of ecosystems.




     These nonvisible effects may be classified as "subtle" because even




their presence or damage may not be detected much less measured.   They




usually fall into a classification of chronic exposure rather than




acute or visible injury.




     The visible injury may express itself as a marginal necrosis  in




dicotyledonous plants and as tip burn in the monocotyledonous plants and




conifers.  Intracostal burning and blotches may appear complicated by




other forms of injury such as nutritional disorders and drought injury.




Very frequently the leaf injury occurs in the palisade and mesophyll cells




between major veins so the symptom may appear as streaks on partially




resistant foliage of monocotyledonous plants and irregular blotches




on others.  A frequent prelude to necrosis is a change in a color  such




as chlorotic flecking and general chlorosis or the inciting of various




shades of brown or red tints in dying tissue.  Other visible symptoms




are suppression of elongation in stems and branches and suppresion of




bud growth.




     The severity of damage from either subtle or visible effects  depends




upon the stage of development in different species.  Enlargement of




vegetative organs may be suppressed in early stages of growth, and the set

-------
of seed and fruit and their orderly expansion may be  damaged most




at the time of anthesis or pollination.




     (Proceed to mechanism of action,  detoxication and  details  of




susceptibility, time-dose relations, etc.)




     The material in this chapter must be used with caution and requires




additional information in order to draw inferences about  the economic




effects of pollutants on plants.

-------
Chapter 6  -  lexicological Effects of Sulfur Oxides on Animals




     Since the chapter was written in 1968,  almost ten years ago,  it  is




in obvious need of updating.  This is especially true in the area  of




sulfuric acid and sulfates.  Data available  on these compounds will




emphasize the importance of particle, size and the fact that  "particulate




sulfate" as such has no toxicological meaning.  The implications of this




should be discussed.




     The finding of importance from studies  of pathology is  that sulfur




dioxide can cause alterations in mucus production which resemble chronic




bronchitis.  Additional work on this has appeared since the  document  was




written (Mawdsley-Thomas et al. Inhaled Particles and Vapors  III) .   This




one important point was somehow left out of  the summary of the current




document.




     The effects of sulfur dioxide on ciliary action per se  is of




minimal importance.  What is important is the overall possible effect




on clearance mechanisms.  There have been several studies on the




effect of sulfur dioxide on clearance of particles which have appeared




since the document as well as the effect of  sulfuric acid on bacterial




clearance done by Fairchild- at EPA.  These should be discussed in  a




section which is retitled "Effects on Clearance Mechanisms"  rather




than "...on Ciliary Action."




     The extensive work on two year exposure of monkeys and  guinea




pigs done at Hazelton Labs should be included in a section which is




retitled "Chronic Exposure" rather than "Lifetime Exposure".

-------
     The present document discusses the only work done  on absorption




of sulfur dioxide at air pollution type concentrations  which indicates




that at these low levels, it is not absorbed by the upper respiratory




tract.  When the summary is reached, for some incomprehensible reason,




the only fact related to air pollution concentration is ignored and the




usual statement is made that "sulfur dioxide is almost  entirely absorbed




in the upper respiratory tract".  This should be rectified in the revision.




     The biochemical section needs updating.  The work  of Gunnison and




Palmes on the occurrence of sulfonates in plasma should be included.

-------
Chapter 7  -. Toxicological Effects of Sulfur  Oxides  on Man




     Tn this area there has not heon a vast  amount  of work done  since




the criteria document was published.  The main thing  that needs




discussion here over and above the chapter as  it  stands is the work




of Bates and Hazuka and of Hackney and Bell  on the  combined  effects




of sulfur dioxide and ozone.  This is extremely important.   There  is




currently work under way to clarify whether  or not  particles play  a




role in this interaction, so information relevant to  that point  should




be available.

-------
Chapter 8  -  Combined Effects of Experimental Exposures  to  Sulfur
              Oxides and Particulate matter on Man and Animals

     This chapter needs to be updated.   Tt should  take note  of  the

fact that sulfuric acid and sulfur dioxide are additive at low  concentrations

not more than additive as they are at high concentrations.   It  should  take

note of the work of Rylander on the effects on clearance  mechanisms  of

combinations of sulfur dioxide and coal dust or manganese dioxide.   It

should note the fact that copper is a potent potentiator  of  sulfur dioxide

and relate this to the studies of Eatough on the binding  of  sulfur

dioxide as sulfite to copper containing aerosols.   It should take note

of the Hazletdn Laboratories studies of long term  exposure of monkeys  to

sulfur dioxide and fly ash.  It should take note of the New  York

University studies indicating that a background exposure  to  sulfur

dioxide with intermittent exposure to benzo(a)pyrene will produce

squamous cell carcinoma of the lung in rats whereas inhalation  of just

the carcinogen will not do so.  It should take note of recent studies

from the Hazelton Laboratories indicating that nitrogen dioxide and

sulfuric acid are more than additive in their pathological effects on

monkeys.

     What is needed is a summary which takes the toxicology  data from

Chapters 6, 7 and 8 and interprets it and puts it  together.   It should

be made plain how the material in Chapter 8 relates to atmospheric

chemistry and the forms in which the sulfur occurs in the atmosphere.

-------
Toxicology is one of the basic inputs to a criteria  document.   The numbers




cannot usually be directly extrapolated; the concepts  can  be extrapolated




to serve a useful purpose.  There has been enough research done in the




area of the sulfur oxides to yield such useful information.  The




summary of this section should not be just a recap of  the  findings;  it




should be more akin to the "Discussion" section of a paper in  which  the




author tells you what the findings presented have to do with the problem




at hand.

-------
Chapter 9  Epidemiological Appraisal of Sulfur Oxides
     This chapter, which is generally assumed to be the most important
chapter in the document, discusses attempts to relate observed health
effects to observed levels of pollution,  It is in this chapter that it
is particularly critical that sulfur oxides and particulates be treated
as a unit.  The chapter has been reviewed till it is threadbare.  The
best balanced critiques of tha epidemiology in the sulfur oxides-
par£iculate area are those of Ian Higgins in the Rail Report don© for
the Office of Management and Budget (A Review of the Health Effects of
Sulfur Oxides, dated October 9, 197,3, submitted by David P. Rail,
         Institute of Environmental Health Seienees, in r%§p©ns% t© a
        fer such a review frem tht Offies ©f Management and Budget t©
           0f Health, Idueitien, and Waif art) and by Htgftn® ani
is £ht Freeeedings ef thi Genlerinet en Health ifftet§ ©f Ai¥
         Aeadetny ef Seiineti, Oe£§be? 3=S, 1973 (e@mmtttfe% ©n
     , U.S. Senate Commie toe ?rint, Serial No, 93=13> N©v
-------