RESTRICTIONS  ON THE  USE;S  OF COAL

United  States Department  of the  Interior
Pittsburgh,  Pennsylvania

June 1971
                                                  ,,, 'to foster, serve
                                             and promote the nation's
                                                economic development
                                                    and technological
                                                      advancement.'
    NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICE


-------
          RESTRICTIONS ON THE USES

                  OF COAL
                 JUNE 1971
     Conducted in cooperation with the
Office of Air Programs of the Environmental
  Protection Agency by the Bureau of Mines
      under a working fund agreement
               UNITED STATES
        DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
              BUREAU OF MINES

-------
BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATA
SHEET
1. Report No.
  APTD-0717
3. Recipient's Accession No.
4. Title and Subtitle
 Restrictions  on  the  Uses  of  Coal
                                                5. Report Date
                                                  June  1971
                                                                    6.
7. Author(s)
                                               8- Performing Organization Rept.
                                                  No.
9. Performing Organization Name and Address
 United States  Department  of  the  Interior
 Bureau of  Mines -  Mineral Supply
 4800  Forbes Avenue
 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania   15213
                                                10. Project/Task/Work Unit No.
                                                11. Contract/Grant No.
12. Sponsoring Organization Name and Address
 Environmental  Protection  Agency
 Office of  Air  Programs
 Research  Triangle  Park, North  Carolina 27711
                                                13. Type of Report & Period
                                                  Covered
                                                14.
IS. Supplementary Notes
16. Abstracts
Although the United States  has  virtually .unlimited reserves of coal  of all ranks, the
future availability of domestic coals may be  limited by factors which range from the
inherent characteristics  of the coal itself to  the nation's capacity for producing and
transporting a high grade product suitable for  various end-use markets.   In addition to
coal's quality characteristcs  that may restrict iLs use in certain markets, other
limiting factors -such as  manpower and transportation availability, and inadequate mine
production and preparation  and  cleaning plant cap^ity are indirectly related to coal
supply and availability.  Each  of these constraint were evaluated in this report and
an attempt was made to show their quantitative  effect upon the future consumption and
use  of coal. .
17. Key Words and Document Analysis.  17a. Descriptors
Coal
Availability
Limiting
Coal  constituents
Transporation
Coal  preparation
Coal  mining
Manpower
Safety
17b. Identifiers/Open-Ended Terms
 17c. COSAT1 Field/Group   2lD
 18. Availability Statement
                   Unlimited
                                    19..Security Class (This
                                       Report)
                                         UNCLASSIFIED
                                                         20. Security Class (This
                                                           Page
                                                              UNCLASSIFIED
          21. No. of Pages
                62
                                                          22. Price
  RM NTIS-35 ( 10-70)

-------
                              Contents
Introduction
Chemical and Physical Properties of Coal	     4






Manpower Limitations	    17






Transportation Limitations 	    26






Coal Preparation	    36






Coal Preparation Plant Capacity and Availabilities	    46






Effects o* Health and Safety Regulations	    49






Summary	    56

-------
                                      TABLES
 1-A.     Coal Consumption at Electric-Utility Plants in FPC Areas
          with Wet- and Dry-Bottom Furnaces,  in 1969 	      7

 1-B.     Coal Consumption at Electric-Utility Plants in the
          United States with Wet- and Dry-Bottom Furnaces,  'in 1969 ....      8

 2-A.     Coal Consumption in Wet-Bottom Furnaces at Electric-
          Utility Plants in FPC Areas, by Sulfur Content, in 1969 	      9

 2-B.     Coal Consumption in Wet-Bottom Furnaces at Electric -
          Utility Plants in the United States, by Sulfur Content,
          in 1969	     10

 3.        Industrial Combustion Equipment Application 	     13

 4.        Coal Properties Significance Chart  For Combustion
          Performance 	     14

 5.        Production and Employment Data in the Bituminous  Coal
          and Lignite Mining Industries, 1960-19,69 	     20

 6.        Projected Production and Manpower Requirements  in the
          Bituminous Coal and Lignite Mining  Industries at  the 1969
          Rate of Froductivity	     21

 7.        Projected Production and Manpower Requirements in the
          Bituminous Coal and Lignite Mining  Industries at  1%
          Average Annual Rate of Growth in Productivity 	     21

 8.        Projected Production and Manpower Requirements in the
          Bituminous Coal and Lignite Mining  Industries at  2%
          Average Annual Rate of Growth in Productivity	     21

 9.        Projected Production of Bituminous  Coal and Lignite in
          the United States at Various Rates  of Productivity 	     24

10.        Float-and-Sink Data from Coal Channel Samples Showing
          Reduction in Ash and Sul fur	    39 -41

11.        Selected Float-and-Sink Data on Coals from Published
          Reports	    43-44

12.        New Bituminous Coal Preparation Facilities Contracted
          for in 1970		    47-48

-------
                             ILLUSTRATIONS


Figure


  1         Bituminous Coal and Lignite Production,  1966-70 	     32
            Railroad Serviceable Hopper Cars,  1966-70 (Excludes
            Privately Owned Cars on Class I Railroads)  	     33
            Transportation of Coal From Mines,  1966-70 	     34

-------
                           Introduction


     Although the United States has virtually unlimited reserves of

coal of all ranks, the future availability of domestic coals may be

limited by a number of factors that range from the inherent character-

istics of the coal itself to the Nation's capacity for producing and

transporting a high grade product suitable for various end-use markets.

     Coals vary greatly in chemical and physical properties and, in

most instances, one rank of coal can not be substituted directly for

another without maj'or changes in burning equipment and methods of

preparation and processing.  Even coals of the same rank can not, many

times, be used to replace other coals.  This applies particularly to

the coking coals, which must be used for coke production, and to the

coals with low ash-fusion-temperatures, which are required for use in

wet-bottom furnaces.  Ash, sulfur, and volatile matter content also

are critical parameters of coal when it is burned in certain types of
                          i                        -
combustion equipment.

     Bureau of Mines projections indicate that coal requirements of the-

United States will increase greatly within the next decade.  Therefore,

in addition to coal's quality characteristics that may restrict its use

in certain narkets, other limiting factors such as manpower and trans-

portation availability, and inadequate mine production and preparation

and cleaning plant capacity are directly related to coal supply and

availability.  Though data were lacking in some areas, these constraints,

as well as those concerned with the quality characteristics of coal,

were evaluated in this report and an attempt was made to show their


-------
     Air pollution control regulations have restricted the burning of

high sulfur (more than 1 percent)  coals in many parts of the United States

and a problem of immediate concern to electric utility plants in some

areas is the procurement of low sulfur coals with ash-fusion temperatures

suitable for use in wet-bottom furnaces.  One part of this study,  which

was developed from data supplied by electric-utility plants to the

Federal Power Commission, has assessed the current requirements for low

ash-fusion temperature coals of electric utilities in various geographical

areas.  The tabular data in this report show that about five-sixths of

the 68 million tons of coal reportedly consumed in wet-bottom furnaces

in 1969 contained more than 2 percent sulfur.  With the passage of more

stringent air pollution control regulations, the problem of coal supply
                                        »
for these plants will become increasingty severe because the total pro-

duction of low-sulfur coals with low ash-iusion temperatures in 1969

was less then 35 million tons.

     Manpower needs of the coal industry were projected for 1975,  1980,

and 1985 using Bureau of .Mines projections of bituminous coal demand in

these years and assuming various levels of productivity.  Even with the

lower assumed rate of growth for productivity, which was less than that

recorded between 1968 and 1969, manpower requirements could increase by

90,000 men in 1980 and 143,000 men in 1985..

     An adequate transportation system for transporting coal from mines

to markets is one of the most important factors in coal availability.

The number of railroad hopper cars available for transporting coal has

declined by about 35,000 during the past 5 years and it is indicated

that the number will decline further unless incentives such as governmental



-------
assistance in financing new cars are made available to railroads with




insufficient earnings to conduct their own car-building program.




However, other actions, such as the doubling of demurrage rates by




the Interstate Commerce Commission to discourage the accumulation




of railroad cars at transshipping facilities and consumer plants, and




the expansion of coal transportation on inland waterways may ease the




coal transportation burden presently consigned to railroads.




     The development of adequate productive, preparation, and cleaning




capacity is, of course, a requisite for adequate supply.  No data are




available, but it is thought that annual productive capacity to supply




domestic demand will have to increase from the present level of about




600 million to nearly 1 billion tons by 1985.  Coal preparation and




cleaning capacity will have to expand at *-in even greater rate because





-------
               Chemical and Physical Properties of Coal




     Coals commonly moved to respective consumer markets may vary widely



in chemical and physical properties, depending, first, upon the coal's



general utilization and, secondly, upon its specific application to a



given process.  The degree of acceptability of certain coals to its



end-use is commonly referred to as the quality of those specific type



coal supplies.  For example, coals moving to coke plants to produce



coke for foundries and steel plants are evaluated physically by the



degree to which they form strong coke residues and the degree to which



they expand during the coking process.  On the other hand, these coals



must also meet requirements which limit the amount of undesirable



chemical and inert materials inherent in the coal.  Some of the more
                                         »                              .  '


limiting factors of coking coals, assuming they display satisfactorily



strong physical properties, are their ash and sulfur contents.  Ash is



undesirable because it is of no practical value to the steel making



process, and sulfur because it imparts an undesirable quality to the



pig iron anc! must be removed by further processing, and at an added cost.



For these reasons, primarily, coking coalt. having low sulfur contents



(generally 1 percent or less) and low to medium ash content (6 to 8 percent)



preferentially are moved to the coke production industry.



     Coals destined to find utilization as fuel for combustion processes



likewise are categorized as to their acceptability or compatibility to



one or more specific types of coal combustion equipment.  Fundamentally,



combustion units are classed by type as fuel-bed burning, suspension



burning, or cyclone burning.  Each appears to fall into general patterns



which depend to a great degree on size and characteristics of the coal


to be utilized.   Some combustion unit designs are more tolerant of coal




-------
quality differences than are others.  Indeed, some combustion units




are designed specifically to handle a wide variety of coals of differing




characteristics, while other units are designed to take advantage of




selected coal characteristics such as coal size, grindability, free




swelling index, moisture, volatile matter, and ash-fusion temperature.




Examples of such combustion unit designs are the spreader stoker-fired




units, which can handle a wide variety of coals; the hopper-fed chain




grate, which recognizes the limiting factors of moisture and a low to




medium (4 to 6) free swelling index of the coal; and the slag-tap




furnaces, wlrich require coal with an ash-fusion temperature in the




low to mid-fusion temperatures (2000-2600°F), with attendant ash




viscosity tolerances on the upper part of that ash-fusion temperature




range; and the pulverized coal (PC) furnaces which favor the more




easily ground coals.




     The evolution of industrial and utility combustion equipment in tae




last 20 to 150 years is remarkable.  Where once plant capacity was realized




from severaJ. medium sized units, it now consists of comparatively much




larger and more highly efficient units.  To a great degree, increased




knowledge ol: the inherent coal characteristics allowed boiler designers




to capitalize on those characteristics and to design units specifically




to take advantage of heretofore undesirable coals.  The slag tap furnace




is one case where the low ash fusion (which is generally a negative




factor in the selection of a boiler fuel) was made to work to the advan-





-------
the dry-ash furnaces which use  finely pulverized coal and require coal


with a high ash-fusion temperature as most of the ash escapes through


the hot screen tubes in the rear of the boiler.  A coal with low ash-


fusion utilized in a pulverized coal furnace would result in ash depo-


sition on these tubes with eventual boiler failure resulting.  On the


other hand, with the slag-tap design, a low ash fusion is desirable


for the system because it is specifically designed to remove the ash


in molton form from the combustion chamber walls.


     As a part of this coal restrictions ttudy, the Federal Power


Commission was consulted and permission We s granted the Bureau of Mines


to extract selected data from FPC's current canvass of the electric


utilities.  Data related to the quality o'l steam coals consumed in


electric-utility plants are presented with respect to the type of


combustion equipment utilized.  The data .ire arranged in several forms

                          •
to show the significance of coal quality.


     The data presented represent about 80 percent coverage of all U.S.


electric-utility plants which were canvassed by FPC and are believed


to be representative of the wet-bottom furnace population in the U.S.


     Table 1A indicates, by FPC area, the number of wet-bottom or slag-


tap furnaces reported and the quality and quantity of the coals consumed.


     Table IB displays these data on a State basis.


     These data are arranged in Tables 2A and 2B to show the distribution


of sulfur ranges with respect to the coals consumed in wet-bottom furnaces.


It is noted that over 56 million tons of the 68 million tons of coal re-


portedly consumed in wet-bottom furnaces possess sulfur contents of 2 per-



-------
TABLE 1A. - Coal Consumption at Electric-Utility Plants in FPC Areas
                 with Wet- and Dry-Bottom Furnaces,  in 1969
FPC Area

F t Ur»r f-Vi .....«._..-



Tr»f-fl1 	

Number of
Plants with
Wet-Bottom
Furnaces
45
8
31
19
1
104
Coal Consumption
(Thousand Short Tons)
In Wet
j." iiA.ria.c3S
2.3,003
326
24,111
20,224
631
68,295
In Dry
Furnaces
11,071
417
3,971
1,170
16,629
Coal Analyses
Percent
Ash
11.7
11.9
12.4
12.5
6.6
12.1
(average)
Percent
Sulfur
3.27
3.02
2.88
2.47
0.50
2.87
(average)
Btu/lb.
11,056
11,795
12,158
11,379
12,673
11,556
(average)
Plant Fuel
Requirement
Percent
Coal
93
52
95
89
65
92

-------
                   TABLE IB. - Coal Consumption at Electric-Utility Plants in the United States
                                 with Wet- and Dry-Bottom Furnaces, in 1969
State


Dist. of Columbia --
























Tntal -- 	

Number of
Plants with
Wet -Bottom
Furnaces
2
2
1
1
5
13
7
10
3
2
1
2
7
2
3
1
1
6
7
1
8
3
4
1
3
2
6
104
Coal Consumption
(Thousand Short Tons)
In Wet
Furnaces
2,000
40
451
2,286
6,729
' 9,784
8,434
1,488
168
5,054
896
1,065
3,020
1,740
118
631
953
3,459
3,390
536
5,587
3,560
1,975
1,382
262
722
2,565
68,295
In Dry
Furnaces
650
406
7,280
1,250
452
921
217
11
218
952
2,337
621
520
591
203
16,629
Coal Analyses
Percent
Ash
13.9
12.6
10.2
11.9
9.9
13.3
11.3
10.1
1207
16.8
8.0
8.4
9.8
11.0
10.6
C C.
W 0 W
6.9
10.0
13o5
13.4
13.5
16.6 •
11.9
9.4
7.7
17.2
10.3
12.1
(average)
Percent
Sulfur
2.09
0.40
1.40
3.80
1.41
3.73
3.42
3.01
3.20
4.02
2.40
1.13
1.77
3.22
3.63
0.50
2.50
2.40
2.45
1.80
4.09
2.22
1.13
2.80
1.13
4.01
2.79
2.87
(average)
Btu/lb.
12,094
9,932
13,228
11,280
11,153
10,304
11,091
11,039
11,340
10,592
13,582
13,084
12,597
11,501
11,416
12,673
13,500
13,155
12,411
12,352
11,666
12,068
12,496
12,070
13,692
11,167
11,655
11,556
(average)
Plant Fuel
Requirement
Percent
Coal
• 100
10
• 67
90
86
93
98
78
42
100
97
97
97
91
80
65
100
73
100
96
100
100
74
64
100
100
95
92
(average)

-------
TABLE 2A. - Coal Consumption in Wet-Bottom Furnaces at Electric-Utility Plants
               in FPC Areas, by Sulfur Content, in 1969
FPC Area

T? 1- tJ/"»Y-t-Vi ..........

AM anf-a .............

Tof-al ..........

Number of
Plants with
Wet -Bottom.
Furnaces
45
8
31
19
1
104
Coal Consumption
(Thousand Short Tons)
Less than
2.0 Percent
1,979
40
1,760
7,37?
63:.
11,783
2.0-3.0
Percent
4,801
12,175
5,511
22,487
More than
3.0 Percent
16,223
286
10,176
7,340

-------
      TABLE 2B. - Coal Consumption in Wet-Bottom Furnaces at Electric-Utility Plants
                     in the United States, by Sulfur Content, in 1969
      State
 Number of
Plants with
Wet-Bottom
 Furnaces
                                                              Coal Consumption
                                                            (Thousand Short Tons)
                                               Less than
                                              2.0 Percent
2.0-3.0
Percent
 More than
3.0 Percent
o Alabama	       2
 Colorado 	       2
 District of Columbia --       1
 Florida 	       1
 Georgia	       5
 Illinois 	      13
 Indiana 	       7
 Iowa	      10
 Kansas 	       3
 Kentucky 	       2
 Maryland 	       1
 Massachusetts 	       2
 Michigan 	       7
 Minnesota 	       2
 Missouri 	       3
 Nevada 	       1
 New Hampshire	       1
   vw Jersey	       6
  aw York	       7
 North Carolina	       1
 Ohio 	       8
 Pennsylvania 	       3
 South Carolina	       4
 Tennessee 	       1
 Virginia 	       3
 West Virginia 	       2
 Wisconsin 		6_

      Total	--	     104
                          40
                         451

                       4,600
                       1,065
                       1,977
                         631
                         242
                        ,536

                           2
                       1,975

                         262
                                         2,000
 2,129
 1,499

   543
   896

 1,043
   953
 3,393
 3,148

   111
 3,558

 1,382
                                         1.716
   2,286

   8,285
   8,434
     943
     168
   .>,054
                                                         L, 740
                                                           118
                                                            66
   5,360
                   722
                   849
                      11,783
22,487
  34,025

-------
under most of the current fuel regulations now in effect or being

considered in many of the geographical areas where wet-bottom furnaces

are currently operated.

     While FPC did not collect information with respect to fuel other

than that shown in the above referenced tables, Bureau knowledge of

other characteristics (1C 7923, Fusibility of Ash of U.S. Coals) of

these coals reveals that essentially all this reported coal (86 million

tons) are below the critical ash-fusion temperature (2600°F).   Replacement
            i.
of coal supp'ies, currently being moved preferentially to wet-bottom fur-

naces, with coals of low sulfur content is not a simple coal substitution.

While some of the lower sulfur coals could be expected to possess ash

fusion temperatures compatible to wet-bottom furnaces, the bulk of those

quality coalt; would have ash-fusion temperature well above the 2600°F

limit and be totally unsuited to continuous boiler operation.   In general,

boiler modifv.cations to allow use of higher fusion coal would not be

economically feasible.

     The cyclone furnace is not the only type of coal combustion equipment

whose successful operation depends upon the judicious selection of coal

for ash characteristics.  The pulverized coal-fired furnace requires coal

with select ash fusion above 2400-2500°F.  Probably the most common broad

classifications of coals with respect to combustion are the tendencies for

the coal particles to either fuse together or to remain separate during

the combustion process.  These characteristics are commonly referred to

as caking and free-burning characteristics, respectively.  Pulverized

coal-fired (PC) units require coals that are free-burning as opposed to

the cyclone which can use the caking variety.  In addition the PC units,

-------
by virtue of the degree to which the coal size must be reduced,  require




coals that are easily ground (low coal grindability).   Aside from the




critical factors of ash-fusion temperature and grindability, the PC




units can effectively handle all ranks of coal and are the most




versatile of all boilers.




     In the industrial and smaller boiler applications, several  types




of combustion systems have been developed--each with its particular




operation characteristics with respect to coal requirements.  Some




indication oE the different firing methods developed,  the types  of




coal utilized and the size ranges for each method are  shown in Table 3.




Table 4 further indicates the degree to which these methods display




sensitivity of operation with respect to coal characteristics.  A




study by Professor T. S. Spicer, Pennsylvania State University,  of




the methods shown in these tables revealed the following conclusion:




     (1)  The "single-retort stoker" will burn all coals from




          anthracite to lignite but not necessarily with equal




          success.  Characteristics sueh as size consist,  ash




          fusibility, and degree of caking nature are  important




          and tend to influence the performance.




     (2)  The "multiple-retort stoker" performs best with the eastern




          caking bituminous coals.  As in the single-retort stoker,




          size consist, ash fusibility and degree of caking are




          important properties.

-------
                           TABLE 3. - Industrial Combustion Equipment Applications
                                                        Types of Coal
    Method of Firing
                      Anthracite
 Bituminous-
    Caking
(Eastern Area)
 Bituminous,
Free-Burning
(Midwestern)
Sub -bituminous
  & Lignites
  (Western)
                                        Range of Boiler Capacity in rounds of Steam Per Hour

Multiple-Retort Underfeed 	





1,000-10,000

10,000-200,000
60,000-1,000,000

1,000-35,000
30,000-500,000
5,000-200,000
10,000-200,000^
60,000-1,000,000
and over
75,000-350,000
per furnace
5,000-30,000
5,000-200,000
10,000-200,000
60,000-1,000,000
and over
75,000-350,000
per furnace


5,000-200,000
10,000-200,000
60,000-1,000,000
and over
75,000-350,000
per furnace
NOTE:  I/  Limited case.
       2/  Certain coals with proper ash fusion.
       3/  Steaming range may exceed maximum figures shown.
SOURCE:

-------
        TABLE 4. - Coal Properties Significance Chart For Combustion Performance
                                                        Stokers *
                                   S.R.
M.R.
T.G.
S.S.
P.F.
Cyclone
   1.  Size consist (as fired)--    V

   2.  Moisture -/	-	    M

   3.  Caking Index I/ 	    I

   4.  Ash Fusibility	    I

   5.  Grindability ---	    N

   6.  Friability 	    M

   7.  Volatile Matter	    M

   8.  Fixed Carbon 	    N

   9.  Ash Content 	    M

  10.  Calorific Value	    N

;  11.  Ash Viscosity 	    M

  12.  Ash Composition	'•-

  13.  Sulfur		---
 I

 M

 I

 I

 N

 M

 M

 N

 M

 N

 M
 I

 N

 V.

 M.

 N

 M

 M

 N

 M

 N

 M
 V

 M

 M

 M

 N

 M

 M

 N

 M

 N

 M
 V

 N

 I

 V

 N

 I

 M

 M

 N

 I
   V

   M

   N

   V

   N

   N

   M

   N

   M

   N

   V
  --See Footnote 4--

  --See Footnote 5--
                                  Rating Code;  V   Very important.
                                                I   Important.
                                                M   Minor importance.
                                                N   Little or no importance.

  *   Abbreviations shown below are for the respective methods listed in Table 3.

  I/  Degree of fineness is a better term for P.F.
  2/  Surface moisture is more critical than inherent moisture.  Moisture is very
      important from the standpoint of plant flowability.
  3_/  Some engineers are attempting to use the F.S.I, as an index of the degree of
      caking.
  4/  Ash composition is very important as it affects fireside fouling, but not
      important to combustion.
  5/  Sulfur is important from a corrosive standpoint, but not important to
      combustion.

-------
(3)  "Spreader stokers" will  handle all  ranks  of  coal  except




     anthracite.   Size consist appears to  be the  most  im-




     portant single characteristic  for this  stoker.  Other




     characteristics are of secondary importance  in  coal




     selection.




(4)  "Traveling-grate stokers" can  handle  every type of




     solid fuel with the exception  of strongly caking




     bituminous coals.   Recent experiments with careful




     sizing to eliminate fines indicate  that even these




     ccals may be used with proper  precautions.   The




     combination  of the degree of free burning versus




     size consist has been carefully studied in selecting




     coal for this stoker.




(5)  "Pulverized  firing" appears  to be the most universal




     method of firing coal because  all ranks of fuels  may




     be. used.  Admittedly, the customer  prefers coals  which




     are easiest  to burn,  most economical  to use,  and




     which require the minimum capital outlay„ Ease of




     grindability and ash  fusion  characteristics  are




     probably the two most important characteristics to




     watch.  The  choice of wet- or  dry-bottom  furnace  and




     the selection of suitable unit furnace  heat  release,




     extend the latitude of the ash fusibility range while




     still securing optimum performance.




(6)  Thus far,  "Cyclone firing" has not  attained  the ver-




     satility of  pulverized firing  in handling as  wide a




     range of coals.   Ash  characteristics  and  size consist





-------
          appear to be the most important fuel characteristic.




          In spite of the limitations cited above, the manufacturer




          states that 70 percent of the bituminous and lignite coals




          produced in the United States are considered suitable for




          use in cyclone furnaces.




     Despite the difficulty encountered in trying to correlate the many




characteristics of coal with actual performance, an attempt has been




made to summarize the significant relationship in Table 4.  The author




is well aware of the hazards involved in ,;uch an effort, but feels that




at least it will stimulate future consideration of this matter.  The




values in the chart are intended to indicate the relative importance




in the overall picture of a given combustion technique.  The quality




of the properties considered is for the a/erage range instead of the




extremes.  Moreover, the chart should be ased more as a "rule of thumb"




for design considerations than as a guide for an existing plant, where




obviously certain characteristics are of oaramount importance due to




limiting design deficiencies.  Actually, the combination of two or




more properties changes the significance of a single item.  For instance,




size consist and caking qualities, or size consist and moisture content




often present an entirely different degree of relative importance than




when considered separately.

-------
                        Manpower Limitations


     One aspect of coal mining that may have a serious limiting effect

upon future coal availability is an adequate supply of manpower.  Since

1949, production of bituminous coal and lignite in the United States has

increased about 25 percent.  During the same period, employment in these

industries has decreased 70 percent.  Approximately 300,000 less men were

employed in this industry in 1968 than were employed in 1949.

     The large decrease in manpower is attributed principally to the

mechanization of mining operations.  However, other factors such as the

closing of many marginal mining operations and the large increase in

production by strip-mining methods have contributed also to the decline.

     A total of 124,532 men was employed in the production of bituminous

coal and lignite in the United States in 1969.  The industry operated an
                               i
average of 226 days during the year arid production averaged 19.90 tons

per man day, or 4,497 tons per man year.

     About 80 percent of the total number of employees (99,269 men) was

employed in underground mining in 1969; 1£ percent (22,323 men) was em-

ployed in strip mining; and the remainder (2,940 men) was employed in

auger mining.  Employment by type of mining' has changed considerably in

recent years, however.  Whereas between 1965 and 1969, employment in

underground mining decreased by more than 10,000 men, 594 more men were

working in strip mines and 672 more men were working in auger mines in

1969 than in 1965.

-------
     Productivity in the bituminous-coal industry,  measured in tons of




output per man per day, has increased from 12.83 tons in 'I960 to 19.90 tons




in 1969.  This increase represented an average annual rate of growth of




5.0 percent for the last 9-year period.  During the past 5 years, pro-




ductivity increased at an average annual rate of growth of A.25 percent.




Between 1967 and 1969, however, the growth rate declined to about 1.5 percent.




     A number of interrelated factors influence productivity in bituminous




coal and lignite mining, but the principa . factors  contributing to the lower




productivity gains of recent years were the smaller growth rates for coal




production by strip mining, and the decline in the  rate of mechanization of




underground mines.




     Overall increases or decreases in productivity in the future will




depend principally upon the type of mining as productivity varies tremen-




dously according to method of production.  In 1969, productivity in terms




of tons of output per man day varied from 39.88 tons for auger mines, to




35.71 tons for strip mines, to 15.61 tons for underground  mines.




      Because of the implementation of recently enacted health and safety




regulations, and because much of the potential of mechanization appears




to have been reached, future gains in productivity  will probably not




exceed 2 percent annually and may even be closer to 1 percent.  In fact,




there is some speculation that productivity may remain at  about the 1969




rate, or actually decline slightly, until about 1985.

-------
     Approximately 80 percent of the bituminous coal is produced in




unionized mines and the bulk of the unionization is associated with




underground mining.  In the event of a general industry strike, it




may be assumed that virtually all underground mines would cease to




operate.  With such a curtailment of production, domestic coal supply




would decline by about two-thirds and, in terms of current domestic




requirements, there would be a shortage of about 300 million tons of




coal for domestic markets.




     Table 5 shows production and employment data in the bituminous




coal and lignite mining industries from 1960 through 1969, and Tables t,




7, and 8 shows similar data projected for 1975, 1980, and 1985 at various




levels of productivity.  Lignite mining is included because there are no




separate data for the lignite mining industry.  The data are not affected




by this inclusion, however, because ligni.te production represents only a




fraction of 1 percent of the total outpu : of both fuels.  Future lignite




production will have, however, increasing significance.




     The analysis of manpower requirements for assumed increases in pro-




ductivity was based upon long-range Bureau of Mines projections for bi lu-




minous coal demand and production for the year 2000 that will be published




in a forthcoming 1970 issue of the Bureau's Mineral Facts and Problems




series.  The low projection, based upon the assumption of present end




uses of coal, corresponds to a production figure of 850 million short tons




in 1985.  The high projection, based principally upon the assumption that




economically competitive synthetic liquid and gaseous fuels become avail-




able, corresponds to a 1985 production figure of 1,350 million short tons.




Data for 1975 and 1980 were based upon the same assumptions.






-------
TABLE  5. - Production and employment data in the bituminous coal
              and lignite mining industries,  1960-1969
Year
1960 	
1961 	
1962 	
1963 	
1964 	
1965 	
1966 	
1967 	
1968 	
1969 	
Production,
million short tons
415.5
403.0
422.1
458.9
437.0
512.1
533.9
552.6
545.2
560.5
Men
employed
169,400
150,474
143,822
141,646
128,698
133,732
131,752
131,523
127,894
124,532
Days worked,
average per year
191
193
199 .
205
225
219
219
219
219
»
226
Productivity,
tons /man /day
12.83
13.87
14.72
15.83
16.84
17.52
18.52
19.17
19.37
19.90

-------
   TABLE  6. - Projected production and manpower requirements in the bituminous
     coal and lignite mining industries at the 1969 rate .of productivity If
Year
1975 	
1 pan----.
1 QQC. 	

Required production,
million short tons
High
796
1,035
1,,350
Low
670
780
850
Manpower Requirements
High
Numb er
181,818
236,403
308,360
Increase
over 1969
57,286
111,871
183,828
Low
Number
153,038
178,164
194,153
Increase
over 1969
28,506
53,632
69,621
    Based upon an average vork year of 220 days,
           TABLE  7.  - Projected production and manpower requirements in
          the bituminous coal and lignite mining industries at 1% average
                       annual rate of growth in productivity _!/
Year
1975 	
1 qorv 	
1 QQS 	

Required production,
million short tons
High
796
1,035
1,350
Low
670
780
850
Manpower Requirements
High
Number
174,370
214,819
267,496
Increase
over 1969
49,838
90,287
142,964
Low
Number
146,769
161,893
168,424
Increase
over 1969
22,237
37,361
43.892
\J  Based upon an average work year of 220 days.
           TABLE  8.  - Projected production and manpower requirements in
          the bituminous coal and lignite mining industries at 2% average
                       annual rate of growth in productivity I/
Year
i Q7S 	
1 OOf) 	
1985 	
Required production,
million short tons
High
796
1,035
1,350
Low
670
780
850
Manpower Requirements
Hie
Number
162,615
192,022
226,267
h
Increase
over 1969
38,083
67,490
101,735
Low
Number
136,874
144,712
150,845
Increase
over 1969
12,342
20S180
26.313
I/  Based upon an average work year of 220 days.

-------
     Tables 6, 7, and 8 show projected high and low manpower requirements


in 1975, 1980, and 1985 at various levels of productivity necessary to

meet projected coal requirements in these years,  assuming a constant

work year of 220 days.  It is impractical to attempt to predict precisely

productivity gains of the future, but a reasonable assessment appears to

be an average annual rate of growth of 1 percent.  At this growth rate and

an  assumed average of 220 days worked per year,  manpower requirements for

producing the projected low range of outputs will be 18 percent higher

in 1975, 30 percent higher in 1980, and 3f percent greater in 1985.  At

the projected high range of output, corresponding manpower increases will

be 40 percert in 1975, 73 percent in 1980> and 115 percent in 1985.  These

percentage increases represent additional manpower requirements varying
                                        *
between 22,237 and 49,838 men in 1975, .27,'361 and 90,287 men in 1980,

and 43,892 and 142,964 men in 1985.  These, data are shown in Table 7.

     Table 6 shows similar data based upon the 1969 rate of productivity,

and Table 8 shows projected manpower requirements if productivity in-

creases at an average annual rate of 2 percent.  At the 1969 rate of an

average output of 19.90 tons per man per day, additional manpower re-

quirements to meet the projected high output will range from 57,286 men in

1975 to 183,828 men in 1985.  Projected low demand at the 1969 productivity

level can be met if there are approximately 29,000 additional workers in

1975, 54,000 additional workers in 1980, and 70,000 additional workers in
1985.

-------
     With a 2.0 percent average annual increase in productivity,



additional manpower requirements at the high and low levels of demand



will range from 12,342 to 38,083 men in 1975; 20,180 to 67,490 men in



1980; and 26,313 to 101,735 men in 1985.



     Table 9 shows the potential output of bituminous coal and lignite



in 1975, 1980, and 1985,.at various levels of productivity if manpower



for production remains at the 1969 level and working days per year



remain constant.  The data shown in this table indicate that production



in these years will, in all instances, fall below the Bureau of Mines



projected low level of demand in these years, even with an assumed



average anm.al rate of growth in productivity of 2 percent.



     Four States - Illinois, Kentucky, Pennsylvania and West Virginia
                                        »


account for approximately three-fourths of the bituminous coal production.



These States also employ about three-fourths of the total number  of men



producing bi.tuminous coal.  Unfortunately, these States have the  lowest



supply of available labor.  According to bureau of the Census data, the



National growth rate for available male labor in the United States in the



18-64 year category is nearly twice that of the four-mentioned coal pro-



ducing States.  West Virginia, in particular, has the greatest potential



shortage of manpower, followed in order by Pennsylvania, Kentucky, and



Illinois.



     It is beyond the scope of this report to attempt to assess potentially



available manpower for coal mining in the future, but it should be recog-



nized that, in addition to the increased numbers of new miners that will



be needed, there will be an additional man-power requirement to replace

-------
                       TABLE 9.  -  Projected  production  of  bituminous  coal  and  lignite  in  the
                                 United  States  at  various rates  of productivity

1 Q7S 	
i Qfin-----.
1 005 	

Production
Million
short tons _!/
595.0
625.3
657.2
Million
short tons 2/
631.2
696.9
769.5
Projected Required
High,
million
shoTf tons
796.0
1,035.0
1,350.0
Low,
million
short t^ns
670.0
780.0
850.0
Days worked,
average
per year
220
220
220
Manpower
availability 3>/
Number
of miners
124,532
124,532
124,532
NJ
I/  Based upon a 1% average annual rate of growth in productivity.

2f  Based upon a 2% average annual rate of growth in productivity.


-------
                                                                                   I.
workers lost by death, retirement, or transfer to other work.   Retire-




ment, however, will claim the greatest number as a recent Bureau of




Mines study for internal use has concluded that the age distribution




of miners currently employed shows a peak at 51 years.




     Recruiting young men for work in the coal mines may become  in-




creasingly more difficult because of the poor public image of the




industry, the hazardous nature of the work and adverse publicity stem-




ming from mine disasters, and the remote location of mines from readily




accessible urban areas.  It may be expected that there will be also a




limited number of mining engineers and supervisory mining personnel




available during the next decade because fewer college students are




pursuing mining as a course of study.




     On the positive side, the coal mining manpower problem has attracted




the attention of the Congress where a bill recently was introduced to




relax immigration regulations to permit experienced foreign miners to




migrate to tie United States if they agree to work in coal mines.  This,




however, would be only a temporary solution to the problem.  The real




solution sho-ild be directed toward long-term remedies.  These could be




programs thau include training in vocational schools established by the




government or industry or scholarship grants for young men who would




agree to study mining engineering as a career.

-------
                      Transportation Limitations






     An adequate supply of transportation equipment, particularly




railroad hopper cars, for moving coal from mines to markets, is one




of the most important facets of coal availability.- Except for unit




train loadings there is little or no storage of bituminous coal at




the mines and coal mines cannot operate without regular supply and




a sufficient number of railroad cars.  At the same time, transportation




costs represent a substantial portion (more than 60 percent above the




f.o.b. mine value) of the delivered price of coal, and so are signif-




icant in coal's competition with other energy sources, particularly




oil and natural gas, which are transmitted by pipelines at lower cost.




     One of -the principal factors contributing to coal shortages during




1970 was a 35,000 decrease in the number of railroad hopper cars avail •




able for coal transportation in the past 5 years.  Although most of




the decrease was attributed to retired cars of the old 50-60 tons




capacity cliiss, their capacity was equivalent to around 50 million




tons of annual coal production, on the basis of 28 turnarounds per




year.  This production could have been taken care of by one-half as




many of the newer 100-ton cars.  On a car-for-car basis, with the




larger cars the production equivalent would have been in excess of




95 million tons.




     These figures do not include cars owned by large consumers,




particularly electric power utilities, or by coal producing companies.




Most of these cars are used in unit trains which, together with unit




train cars owned by the railroads, have substantially improved car




efficiencies, including the need for fewer cars, with corresponding






-------
cost savings.  It is estimated that unit trains and other train-loads




carry approximately one-third of total coal shipments.




     Emergency transportation measures .that helped appreciably towards




the increase of 30 million tons of coal movement in 1970 were the




"permit" system established by the N. & W. and C. & 0. Railroads,




which limited shipments to tidewater only to those scheduled to




coincide with ship arrivals at Hampton Roads; the doubling of de-




murrage rates by the Interstate Commerce Commission to discourage




the accumulation of cars at transshipping facilities, consumer




plants, and at non-operating mines; I.C.C. orders requiring the




prompt return after unloading of open top cars to the owning rail-




roads; and other actions which effected a better distribution of




cars.




     In the overall, however, the number of cars available for coal




movement still is far below what is, and will be, required to assure




adequacy of coal supplies, both in emergencies and as energy demand




continues to accelerate.  If developing and programmed increases in




mining capacity are to be fully effective in supplying additional




coal requirements, and if estimated future demands for coal are to




be met, on both a short- and long-term basis (610 million tons of




production in 1971, 690 million tons in 1975, and 933 million tons




in 1980), it is vitally necessary that additional railroad cars and




auxiliary transportation equipment, including locomotives, be made




available from one source or another.




     A 100-ton hopper car today costs approximately $16,000.  To ini-




tiate  a car-building program involving, for example, 2,000 of these




cars, a railroad company is forced to spend about 32 million dollars,






-------
 It  is understandable that necessary car-building expenditures are




 deferred by some large coal-carrying railroads as long as possible




 in  view of their low level of earnings.  These additional cars could




 be  provided, however, by car building and leasing services, coal pro-




 ducers  or consumers, government authorities, or otherwise, through




 private financing or governmental assistance or surveillance.  Among




 possible alternatives for the latter are direct financing, guaranteed




 loans,  tax incentives or'penalties of one kind or another, subsidies,




 or  other methods of funding.  Whatever the means, something must be




 done, and the  lead should be taken by those with primary responsibilities;




 i.e., the Interstate Commerce Commission and the Department of Transportation.




 Also, it may be necessary that the Government or others encourage research




toward the development of less costly transportation methods and/or more




 reliable means of providing adequate coa! or coal-produced energy at all




 times.  The latter could include studies on the fundamental reasons fo?r




 the decrease in car supplies and for the lack of replacement of retired




 equipment, the expanded use of coal slurry pipelines and of extra-high-




 voltage (EHV)  transmission of coal-generated power from "minemouth"




 plants  located in or near the coal fields, of railroad freight rate




 structures in  relation to their compatibility with services rendered,




 and of  whatever further authority is needed by the I.C.C. to establish




 such rules and regulations as may be necessary to assure better dis-




 tribution of cars among essential commodities.

-------
      A shortage  of  hopper  cars  is  a major problem  in coal producing

 and marketing areas east of  the Mississippi River  because of  the  low

 earnings of certain Eastern  carriers  and their  inability to maintain

 adequate rolling stock.  One possible means of  increasing car utili-

 zation by these  carriers is  to  build  on-ground  storage  facilities at

 the coal ports at Toledo,  Hampton  Roads and Newport News similar  to

 those now in operation  at  Conneaut, Ashtabula,  and Sandusky,  Ohio.

 The proposition  of  ground  storage  facilities represents an attractive

 financial solution  to hopper car shortages.  It is estimated,  that

 construction of  these facilities would release  at  least 25,000 hopper

 cars for use other  than for  the coal  export and tidewater trade and

 would annually process  55  million  tons of coal.  It is  estimated

 that these facilities would  cost 50 million dollars versus 400 million

 dollars for the  cars.  Because  of  the current level of  railroad earn-

 ings and shortage of capital it may be necessary that the Government

 consider a Federal  investment of such a sum to  initiate the. program.

      Overall,  the existing coal transportation  restrictions should eas3

 somewhat as the  trend of increasing production  in  Western States  con-

 tinues.   In the  West, transportation  facilities are planned for ade-

 quately to coincide with increases in production whether it be in

 maintaining sufficient hopper-car  fleets, the trend toward extra-high

 voltage transmission or coal pipelines such as  the one now in operation

 from a mine in Arizona  to  a  powerplant in Nevada.

      In Eastern  States  the steady  growth in river  tonnage in  recent years

 is  expected to accelerate  in the immediate years ahead  and thereby, to

 some extent,  ease the coal transportation burden of railroads.  The major

 reasons  for the  anticipated  growth in coal transportation on  the  inland

waterway system include  the following:

-------
     1.  The long-range construction and expansion program of the

          Army Corps of Engineers to modernize and extend the inland

          waterway system.

     2.   The continuing improvement in the design of tow, barge

          and dock equipment to provide more efficient haulage and

          handling.

     3.   The continuing migration of industrial plants to river

          areas where ample supplies of water are available in

          addition to the availability of low-cost transportation

          of raw materials, and finished goods.

     The importance of river transportation can be gauged by the fact

that in 196S: more than 160 million tons of coal moved on the inland

waterways.  This waterway movement is concentrated largely in six
                                      j
areas:           .

     1.   Kanawha, Ohio and Monongahela Rivers to the Pittsburgh area.
     2.   Illinois River to the Chicago area.
     3.   Illinois and Mississippi Rivers to the Twin Cities area.
     4.   Western Kentucky to Tampa via the Ohio and Mississippi Rivers
          to New Orleans and across the Gulf.
     5.   Western Kentucky and southern Illinois to steam plants on the
          Lotfer Ohio, Mississippi and Tennessee Rivers.
     6.   Along the Black Warrior River in Alabama.

     The Army Corps of Engineers is continually improving and extending

the network of waterways.  It is about.to complete a new waterway known

as the Arkansas-Verdigris Navigation System.  This waterway when com-

pleted will make completely navigable for the first time a 436-mile

section of tie Arkansas River and its tributary, the Verdigris, from

Catoosa, head of navigation for the system, to the Mississippi.  It

will link the Arkansas River with some 25,000 miles of inland and

coastal waterways from the Great Lakes to the Gulf of Mexico, in-

cluding such major industrial markets as Chicago, Cleveland and


-------
     This waterway will help in making it possible to open for




development the vast coal resources adjacent to or within the so-




called Arkansas Basin.  About 160,000 square miles in area, the




Basin covers most of Arkansas and Oklahoma,  half of Kansas, the Texas




Panhandle, and portions of Colorado, New Mexico and Missouri.




      Figures 1, 2, and 3 show, respectively, bituminous coal and




lignite production, serviceable railroad hopper cars, and the quan-




tities of coal shipped from mines by various methods for the period




1966-1970.




     In summary, the non-rail modes of transportation, in all likeli-




hood, will be adequate in meeting the demands placed upon them.  In




order to assure adequate rail transportation, the following sequence   ;




of actions will assist in achieving the proper availability of hopper




cars through 1975.




     1.  The intensified application of the Interstate Commerce




         Commission of its several powers in the area of car util-




         ization, including the continuation of increased demurrage




         charges now in effect.  Additionally, the Commission should




         further accelerate the formation of unit trains by encouraging




         appropriate rate adjustments and applications for service,,




         Incentive per diem should be immediately levied on hoppers




         to encourage prompt return of cars and to foster equitable




         growth in ownership.  Free time should be reduced from 48 to




         24 hours, except at lake and tidewater ports, where gradual




         reduction should be made toward at least a 50 percent




         improvement.     •;







-------
                         Fig.  1 - Bituminous Coal and Lignite Production,  1966-70
650
   1966
1967
1968
1969

-------
OJ
u>
   co
   n
   CO
  U-l
   o
   CO
   to
   §
        500
        450
        400
350
        300*
          1956
                                  Fig.  2 - Railroad Serviceable Hopper Cars,  1966-70

                                 (Excludes Privately Owned Cars on Class  I Railroads)
                          1967

-------
    600
                                Fig. 3 - Transportation o.f Coal from Mines,  1966-70
   500 !-
                                 Other (truck, minemouth
                             conveyor,  etc.)
   400 I
                                                Waterways
                                                Railroads
to
C
o
to
G
O
   300
   200
   100
      1966
1957
1969

-------
2.  For the immediate and long-term period,  government assistance




    in financing new cars under a program administered by the




    I.C.C. should be made available to railroads with in-




    sufficient earnings to conduct their own car-building




    program.




3.  Greater utilization of the existing fleet of hopper cars




    should be attained by construction of on-ground storage




    facilities at the coal ports at Toledo,  Ohio and Hampton




    Roads and Newport News, Virginia.




4.  It should be recommended that tha  Interstate Commerce




    Commission administer a program to guarantee loans to




    those coal-carrying railroads with inadequate hopper-




    car fleets.

-------
                           Coal Preparation


     Coal washing or cleaning refers to the removal of extraneous

material such as pyrite, ash, or shale, from.the raw coal.  Other

than froth flotation, coal cleaning processes are based primarily

on the specific gravity of the materials present.  High ash coal

or coal middlings may also be separated.  The greater the quantity

of intermediate near gravity material, the more difficult is the

cleaning process.  An excellent reference on coal preparation has

been published by the American Institute of Mining and Metallurgical
           i /
Engineers. --'

     The Bureau of Mines published a repor1: _'  tabulating pyritic,

sulfate, and total sulfur contents of 2,000 coal samples obtained
                                        »
in 29 states.

     The te.on pyritic sulfur is used in reference to two crystal forms

of iron suicide, either pyrite or marcasite.  The crystal structure is

generally determined by the use of X-rays,

     Macroscopic pyrite is present in the coalbed as veins, lenses,

nodules or balls.

     Microscopic pyrite occurs as small globules, discrete grains,

cavity fillings, and crystalline bundles and aggregates.  Published

photomicrographs depict pyrite grains 1 to 2 microns in diameter.
     !_/  Leonard, Joseph W.,  and David R. Mitchel,  and others,  Coal
Preparation, third edition, AIME, 1968.

     "lj  Walker, F. E. and F. E. Hartner, Forms of  Sulfur in U.S.
Coals, Bureau of Mines, I.C.  8301, 1966, 51 pp.

-------
     Theoretically, the pyrite and marcasite with specific gravities

of 4.9 to 5.0 should be able to be removed from coal since coal is

considered to have specific gravities of 1.2 to 1.7.

     In coal washing practice the actual percentage of iron sulfides

removed ranges greatly between coals from various coalbeds.  If the

pyrite is free (not in or attached to the coal particles) most of the

pyrite can be rejected by the proper cleaning techniques.  Sulfur in

the forms of organic sulfur or sulfates is affected little by clean-

ing and in general cannot be removed.

     Prior to the erection of a coal preparation plant,  the coal prop-

erty should be sampled at various points to assure a representative

sample has been obtained of the area to be mined.  A complete washa-

bility study should be made.  Each set o* coal washability curves .?_/

presents the following curves.  The cumulative ash and sulfur curves

indicate the- analysis in percent at a given yield of float coal.  The

specific-gravity curve indicates the yield of float coal at any given

specific gravity.  The + 0.10 specific-gravity curves indicate the

distribution of near gravity of separation material and  are used in

estimating the difficulty of separation.

     A size consist curve should be prepared to aid in the determining

types and the required capacities of the cleaning equipment.
     _3/  Coe, G. D.,  and Explanation of Washability Curves for the
Interpretation of Float-and-Sink,  I.C.  7045,  1938,  10 pp.

-------
     An alternate procedure would be to run the raw coal through an




existing coal preparation plant.  Such a test would require a tonnage




sufficient for several hours operation of the plant at or near its




rated capacity.  The results of one plant-test using 500 tons of



                                                      4/
raw coal were presented in Bureau of Mines R.I. 5397. —




     In connection with the APCO program, face or tipple samples were




taken at mines in the Appalachia Region.  Each sample weighed about




600 pounds and was loaded into steel drums for shipment.  At the labo-




ratories, eich coal sample was crushed to pass a 1 1/2-inch square




mesh screen, and was reduced to about 250 pounds by quartering.  The




sample was iedusted by screening on a 100-mesh screen.  Float-and-sink




tests using organic liquids were made at the following gravities; 1.30,




1.40, 1.60.




     Table LO presents the results of laboratory separations of channel




samples at 1.60 specific gravity.  This specific gravity approximates




the effective specific gravity at which many steam coals are cleaned.




The float-sink fractions were analyzed for ash, pyrite sulfur, and




total sulfur.  Cumulating data from the float-sink fractions, the




100 percent yield shows the percentage of ash, pyritic sulfur, and




total sulfur contents of the raw coal sample.  The main purpose of




presenting this table is to indicate coalbeds amenable to reduction




in sulfur content by cleaning.  In counties where more than one channel




sample was taken, the results were averaged with some loss in accuracy.




This was done to avoid too voluminous a table.
     4/  Perry, R. E., B. W. Gandrud,  H.  L.  Riley,  J0  B.  Gayle,  and

W. H. Eddy, Laboratory and Full Scale  Sulfur Elimination  Tests on Coals

from t.he Pratt Bed, Alabama, Bureau of Mines, R.I.  5397,  1958, 25 pp.

-------
                TABLE 10.  - Float-and-sink data from coal channel samples T./ showing reduction  in  ash and sulfur
OJ
Coalbed
Pittsburgh
Do.
Do.
Do.
Do.
Do.
Do.
Do.
Do.
Do.
Do.
Do.
America
Clements
Gwin
Mary Lee '"•
Baker st own
Do.
Jawbone
Upper Banner
Splash Dam .
Tiller
Upper
Freeport
Do.
Do.
Do.
State
Ohio
do.
do.
do.
Pa.
do.
W. Va.
do.
do.
do.
do.
do.
Alabama
do.
do.
do.
Md.
do.
Va.
Va.
do.
do.

Pa.
do.
do.
do.
County
Belmont
Gallia
Harrison
Jefferson
Greene
Washington
Brooke
Harrison
Marion
Marshall
Monongalia
Ohio
Walker
do.
Jefferson
do.
Allegany
do.
Russell
Dickenson
do.
Russell

Allegheny
Armstrong
Butler
Cambria
Number
of
samples
3
1
2
5
4
1 •
1
3
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
.1
1
1
1
1
"1

1
2
1
1


Ash in
Yield 2/ float 2/
91.2
9'6.1
83-2
90.9
9U.it
93-7
65.1*
93-5
94.5
91.2
95-9
92.?
83-7
. 90.5
91.6
87-9
80.5
92.7
84.2
'87.7
76.2
95-2

78-7
72.3
8l.O
8l. 4
7-7
7-0
8.6
8.6
7-6
5-6
9-4
7-4
6.5
7-5
8.0
6.6
7.1'
8.8
IV. 1
10.0
15.8
. 10.2
10.3
5-3
5-8
4.8

10.0
13.2
10.6
. 8.6

PERCENT

Ash in Ash Sulfur in
sample reduction 2/ float 2/
12.5
8.6
18.3
13-5
10.1
8.5
34.1
10.1
9-4
10.9
9-7
8.9
13.9
13.5
16.3
16.5
21.8
13.2
20.2
12.8
21.9
7.5

22.5
28.0
' 20.4
18.6
38.4
18.6
42.3
36.3
24.8
34.1
72.4
26.0
30-9
31-2
17.5
25.8
48.9 •
34.8
12.9
39-4
27-5
22.7
49.0
58.6
73-5
3-6

77-6
52.9
48.0
53-8
3.90
2-74
3-31
3.26
2.22
1.50
4-53
3-56
2.24
3-42
2.31
3.13
1.52
3-40
1.47 -
' .88
1-97
2.31
.58
.66
•83
.48

1-52
1-39
1.20
2.30

Sulfur in
sample
4-35
3.26
3-73
3.66
3-02
1.67
4.04
5-01
2.98
4.40
2.75
3-61
1.71
3.75
•1-77
.89
2.6l
2.80
•54
.69
.80
.47

1.90
2.01
1.28
4.47

Sulfur
reduction 2/
10.3
16.0
11-3
10.9
26.5
10.2
3/ 12.1
28.9
24.8
22.3
16.0
13.3
11.1
9-3
16.9
1.1
24-5
, n-5
3/ 7-4
4.3
3/ 3-8
3/ 2.1

20.0
30-8
6-3
48.5

-------
        TABLE 10. - Float-and-sink data from coal channel samples I/ showing reduction in  ash and sulfur - Continued
Coalbed
Upper
Freeport
Do.
Do.
Do.
Do.
Brookville
Do.
Do.
Clairon
Lower
; Baker st on
Mahoning
Middle .
Kittaning
Do.
Do.
Do.
Do.
Do.
Lower
Kittaning
Do.
Do.
Do.
Do.
Do.
State

Pa.
do.
do.
W. Va.
do.
Ohio
do.
Pa.
do.

W. Va.
Ohio

do.
do.
do.
do.
Pa.
¥. Va.

Ohio
do.
do. ,
Pa.
do.
do.-
Number
of
County samples

Clearfield
Tioga
Westmoreland
Grant
Preston
Mahoning
Jackson
Lawrence
Clairon

Grant
Guernsey

Columbia
Perry
Muskingum
Tuscarawas
Clairon
Barbour

Jefferson
Lawrence
Muskingum
Armstrong
Bedford
Cambria

3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2

1
1

4
3
1
2
1
1

1
1
1
1
1
'2

Yield 2/

81.7
96.3
73-3
61.8
89.2
95.3
90.5
96.6
90.2

63.1
70.3

89.6
82.5
95-7
85.3
98.1
81.4

84.4
88.1
93.3
84.1 .
84.9
79-8 .

Ash in
float 2/

10.6
8-3.
6.4
12.1
9-0
5-4
4.9
3.4
8.0

12.3
8.6

5-6
10.0
• 4.4
5-6
6.6
10.9.

9-2
9.4
9.6
8.4
6.6
8.7

PERCENT
Ash in Ash
sample reduction 2/

17-9
10.0
22.4
34.4
13-7
5-7
10.3
4.8


29.1
-28.3

11.2
.18.5
6.4
13.2
6.7
18.5

17-3
14.4
11.6
• 16.5
13-5
19-0

40.8
17-0
71.4
64.8
34.3
5-3
52.4
29.2


57-7
69.6

JpU.O
45.9
31.3
57-6
1-5
41.1

46.8
34.7
17.2
49-1
5L1
54.2

Sulfur in
float 2/

3.29
.98
2.19
1.54
1.19
2.06
3.20
1-55
2.33

1.36
3-73

2.29
2.39
2.31
2.94
•79
1.86

2-95
3-35
3-84
3-42
1.03
.81

Sulfur in
sample

4.83
1-55
3.60
2.42
1-53
2.60
4.03
2.35
3-39

3-01
- 4.44

3.85
4.71
2.99
5.40
.80
2.68

3.80
4.72
4.85
5.09
2.06
1.43

Sulfur
reduction 2/

.-31-9
36.8
39-2
36.4
22.2
20.8
20.6
34.0
31-3

54.8
18.4

40.5
49-3
22.7
45-6
1-3
30.6

22.4
29.0
20.8
32.8
50.0
43-4

-------
        TABLE 10. - Float-and-sj.nk data from coal channel samples I/ showing reduction in ash and sulfur  - Continued
Coalbed
Lower
Kittaning
Do.
Do.
Sewickley
Do.
Do.
Do.
Do.
Jordon
Klondike
Sewanee
Walnut
Mountain
State

Pa.
do.
do.
Ohio
do.
do.
do.
¥. Va.
Tenn.
Tenn.
do.

do.
County

Clairion
Indiana
Jefferson
Belmont
Harrison
Morgan
Noble
Monongalia
Claiborne
Anderson
Marion

Campbell
Number
of
samples

1
7
1
1
2
2
3
1
1
1
1

1


Ash in
Yield 2/ float 2/

92.0
84.5
96.9 '
95-6
• 96.6
87-5
92.3
92-9
98.1
94-7
96 ,Q

92.4

6.5
6.6
7.1
12.0
9.9
12.4
13.2
10.4
3-0
7-1
8.2

5-3

PERCENT
Asb in Ash
sample reduction 2/

9-5
14.5
8.4
13-3
11.0
17-0
15-6
13-3
4.0
9-1
10.8

10.0

31-6
5^.5
15-5
9.8
10.0
27 .-1
15.4
21.8
25.0
22.0
24.0

47-0

Sulfur in
float 2/

2.24
1.87
1.12
2.57
1.66
4.77
5-01
3.56
.69
1.06
• 67

• 71


Sulfur in Sulfur
sample reduction 2/

3-65
3-9^
1.34
3.03
2.08
5.54
5.70
4.56
.76
1-99
• 71

.81

38. 6
52.5
16.4.
15-2
20.2
13.9
12.1
21.9
9.2
46.7
5-6

18.1
I/ Minus 1 1/2 inch by 100 mesh.
2y At 1.60 specific gravity.

-------
     Table 11 was compiled from a series of Bureau of Mines reports of




investigations.  The report number is listed in the table.  When the




raw coal sample contained less than one percent sulfur, sulfur analyses




were not run on the float-and-sink fractions.




     A short description is given of float-and-sink results on seven




coalbeds which have some of the largest reported reserves.




     Currently additional float-and-sink tests are being conducted by




the Bureau for EPA.  Additional coal preparation data will be needed




to estimate  the percentage of coal reserves which can be mined and




upgraded to the desired standards.




     Twenty-nine channel samples were taken from the Pittsburgh coalbeds




in twelve counties in Ohio, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia.  Five




channel samples from Greene, and Washing>:on Counties, Pennsylvania,




and Marion and Monongalia Counties in Went Virginia had float 1.60 frac-




tions with 1.1 to 2.0 percent sulfur-con :ent.




     The Pocahontas No. 3 coalbed has been sampled in conjunction with




coking coal reports in Buchanan, Dickenson, and Tazewell Counties in




Virginia, and in Mercer, Raleigh, and Wyoming Counties in West Virginia.




The ash content in the cleaned coal should be 6.0 percent or less.  The




total sulfur content is less than 1.0 percent in the raw coal.  This coal




is used in coal blends to make metallurgical coke.     *




     The Mary Lee Coalbed in Warrior Coalfield in Alabama was channel




sampled.  The float 1.60 fractions contained 0.7 and 1.1 percent total




sulfur, respectively.  The ash content of the float product averaged




10.0 percent.  In Jefferson County the washed coal is used in blends




for coke production.

-------
                       TABLE 11.- Selected float-and-sink data on coals I/ from published reports
PERCENT
Coalbed
Upper Elkhorn #3
or
Cedar Grove





Cedar Grove








Eagle





Fire Clay
State County
Kentucky Floyd
Harlan
Knott
Knott
Letcher
Letcher
Pike
Pike
West Boone
Virginia Boone
Kanawha
Kanawha
Logan
Logan
Logan
McDowell
Mingo
. West McDowell
Virginia Nicholas
Nicholas
Raleigh
Raleigh
Virginia Buchanan
Kentucky Perry
Yield








3/
3/
3/
3/






3/
I/




94
97
98
83
99
76
85
95
92
95
98
97
93
88
94
85
88
95
91
95
86
79
88
98
.•o
.4 '•
.0
• ;3
.4
.8
.6
.6
• 3
.2
•3
• 5
.8
.9
.4
• 7
• 5
.1
• 3
•3
.6
.2
.6
.6
Ash in
float
3-4
1.8
3-4
4.6
3-5
2-9
5.5
5-5
5-3
4.1
4.9
' 3.8
4.1
6.8
7.4
5.6
4.1
4.6
5.3
5-7
5-1
4-9
2.9
3.4
Ash in
sample
6-9
3.1
4.1
16.7
3-8
21.6
13-4
7-5
9.0
6.3
5-7
5-0
7-6
12.8
10.3
15-2
12.1
6.8
9.5
7.4
14.0
20.4
10.1
3.9
Sulfur
in float
1.06

1.76

1.16

2.25
.68

1.06
1-33
1,14
1.27
l.Uf
1.10


1.11





0.65
Sulfur in Reduction BuMines Rept
sample of sulfur of Inv. No.
1.49
2/ 1.0
1.96
2/ 1.00
1.21
2/ 1.00
3.64
.87
2/ 0.8
1.26
1-59
1.29
1.91
1.43 '
1.18 '
2/ 1.0
2/ 1.0
1.21
2/ 0.7
2/ 0.7
1.0
2/ 0.6
2/ 0.8
0.87
28.

10.

.

38.
21.

15-
16.
11.
33-
25.
6.


8.





25.
9

2

4

2
2

9
4
6
5
2
8


3





3
4920
.- 5140
4993
4993
5135
5135
4910
4910
5909
5909
6296
6296
5306
5306
5306
5094
• 5278
509;
6136
6136
5070
5070
674o
5230

-------
                       TABLE 11. - Selected float-and-sink data on coals I/ from published reports - Continued
PERCENT
Coalbed
Flagg
Harlan
Hindman
Lower Elkhorn
or
Imboden
>
>
Pocahontas #3

State
Kentucky
Kentucky
Kentucky
Kentucky
Virginia
West
Virginia
Virginia
County
Perry
Harlan
Harlan
Let cher
Pike
Pike
Pike
Wise
Mercer
Raleigh
Wyoming
Buchanan
Dickenson
Tazewell
Yield
93-2
99-2
99-2
84.5
82.7
95-6
95-3
95-7
94-5
96.2
3o.o
3/ 92.3
93-1
3/ 96.5
Ash in
float
.1 -^
2-3
3.4
7.4
3-6
5.7
6.8
5-3
4-7
6.0
5-9
3-2
5-6
' 4.9
Ash in
sample
?.4
2-7
3.8
15-7
16.4
8.1
9-1
7-3
6-9
' -I'l
7-7
10.2
6.6
Sulfur Sulfur in Reduction BuMines Rept.
in float sample of sulfur of Inv. No.
-/
2/
2/
1.07
^
2/
2/
2/
J
6.4
^
2/
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.36 21.3
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.8
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6l 4/ -5
0.9
0.5
5230
5l4o
5140
5135
4910
4910
4910
5391
6227
5070
5112
6740
5405
6297
I/  Minus 1 1/2-inch by 100 mesh.
2/  Raw coal.
3/  All specific gravities of separation 1.60 except that those indicated by footnote were 1.58.

-------
     Based on published data, a sample of the Lower Elkhorn coalbed




in Letcher County, Kentucky, yielded a. float 1.60 specific gravity




fraction of 1.1 percent sulfur.  In Pike County, Kentucky and Wise




County, Virginia, four samples of raw coal from this bed had a sulfur




content of less than 1.0 percent.




     Sixteen channel samples were taken in the Lower Kittanning




coalbed at 15 mines in 8 counties located in Ohio and Pennsylvania.




In four samples, the float 1.60 fractions contained 1.0 or less total




sulfur.  For five, the float 1.60 fractions ranged from 1.1 to 2.0 per-




cent total sulfur.  The balance exceeded 2.1 percent.  The coal samples




obtained in  Cambria and Bedford Counties, Pennsylvania indicate the




coals from the Lower Kittanning coalbed should be capable of being




cleaned to 1.0 percent sulfur or less.




     Based on published literature, 16 references to float-and-sink




tests were tabulated on the Upper Elkhorn No. 3 or Cedar Grove in Floyd,




Knott, Letcher, and Pike Counties in Kentucky and Boone, Kanawha, Logan,




McDowell and Mingo Counties in West Virginia.  Six samples of raw coal




had a sulfur content of less than 1.0 percent.  Eight float 1.60 frac-




tions had a sulfur content of 1.1 to 1.5 percent.




     One sample from the Eagle coalbed in McDowell County, West Virginia




had a float 1.60 fraction with 1.0 percent sulfur.  Five other raw coal




samples, from the Eagle coalbed in Nicholas and Raleigh Counties, and




Buchanan County in Virginia had less than 1.0 percent sulfur.

-------
          Coal Preparation Plant Capacity and Availability






     In 1969, the total production of bituminous coal and lignite was




560.5 million tons.  Of this production 334.8 million tons, or 59.7 per-




cent was cleaned by wet and pneumatic methods.  According to one trade




journal, the cleaned coal capacity of coal cleaning equipment sold in




1970 totaled 20.1 thousand tons per hour compared with 11.6 thousand




tons per hour for equipment sold in 1969.   Based on an estimated use




of 12 hours per day and 220 days per year, 53.1 million tons of cleaned




coal capacity was added in 1970.  This added capacity was about 9 percent




of the estimated 1970 coal production.




     The lead time, from signing the contract to the time the preparation




plant is operational, may range from one»uo two years.  This lead time




does not include the time required for coal sampling or coal washability




tests.




     Several companies building new facilities reported three to four




bidders on contracts to erect coal washability plants.  Considering




that 59.7 percent of the 1969 production was cleaned, and plant capac-




ity in 1970 increased 9 percent, the erectors should be able to keep




up with a normal increase in demand for new preparation plants.




     New bituminous coal preparation facilities contracted for in 1970




are shown in Table 12.

-------
TABLE 12. - New Bituminous Coal Preparation Facilities  Contracted for  in 1970
             Coal company
                                    Plant location
Capacity, Preparation equipment
  tph

Allegheny Mining Corp 	
Allegheny River Mining Co. .



(
f





Doavor Creek Consolidated
Coal Co 	

Bethlehem Mines Corp 	 ,

I
Doonc County Coal Corp. . . j


f







\
Cllnchflcld Coal Co 	 4
1
Consolidation Coal Co 	
Eastern Associated Coal Corp. '




1
Gorg.is, Ala. 1,COO
Ml. Storm W. Va. 200
Kittannlng, Pa. 600
Logan, W. Va. 300
Sl.iglc. W. Va. 400

• Fabius, Ala. 500
Ocllc Rive, III. . 800
Monlcoal, W. Va.
Twilight, W. VA. ...
Phillppl, W. Va. ...
Darncsboro, Pa. . . .
Carrolltown, Pa. 250


Wayland, Ky. 650 '

Jenkins, Ky. . . .
Kayford, W. Va. 650

Monclo, W. Va.
Sharpies, W. Va. 250*
Kcrnilt, W. Va. ...
Cannclton, W. VA, ...
Carbon, W. Va.
Wcvaco, W. Va. 324

t Wincfrcdc.-W. Va. ...
Clarion, Pa. 400
New Haven. W. Va.
Pueblo, Colo. ' ...

Feds Creek, Ky. 200
Mouthcard, Ky. ...
. Clinchficld, Va. 20
•Bccklcy, W. Va. ...
Raleiflh, W. Va. 20
Affinity, W. Va. 400
Coono County, W. VA. ...

Stone. Ky. 25
Enosville, Ind. ...
Oakland City, Ind.
Ounlap, Ky. 200
Pike County, Ky. . . .
McNally Pittsburg
Irvin-McKcIvy
Jrvln-McKcIvy
Bird Machine
\ Dr.ivo1-0
I Hcyl «. Patterson
McNally Piltsburo
McN.illy Pittsburg

•Kanawlia'
Daniels
Hcyl f« Paltrrson
J.O. Lively
Hcyl & Patterson

McNally Pittsburg
Oclstcr
Hcyl & Patterson
[McN.illy Pittsburg
HcyldPattcrson
Heyl e. Patterson
i Daniels
Dcislcr
Daniels .
Daniels
Galis
f McNally Pittsburg
{ Galis
L Hcyl & Patterson
Galis
Irvin-McKcIvy
i McNally Pittsburg
Dlrd Machine
Roberts & Schaefcr
[' Dravo
L Bird
Dravo
Dlrd
Hcyl & Patterson
Dlrd
Roberts & Schaefcr
Roberts 4. Schaefcr
! OTA vo
Bird Machine
Hcyl & Patterson
Roberts t, Schaefcr
iZcni-McKinncy-Willlanis
Dcistcr
Dravo

-------
TABLE 12. - New Bituminous Coal Preparation Facilities Contracted for in 1970

                                     (continued)
                 Coal company
                                        Plant location
Capacity, Preparation equipment
  ton










Jcwrll liid
-------
             Effects of Health and Safety Regulations



     Recently enacted Federal health and safety regulations will



restrict coal availability principally from the standpoint of available



manpower.  However, a small amount of production is expected to be



curtailed because of the closing of some marginal mines that can not



afford to provide the required health and safety requisits.



     Essentially, the regulations require continuous checks on venti-



lation and the accumulation of coal dust to insure against explosions;



the inspect:.on of roof support systems, electrical and mechanical



equipment; and the virtual discontinuance of operations until all



deficiencies", in equipment and operating areas have been corrected.



Undoubtedly, these requirements will have a profound effect upon pro-
                                        •


ductivity and, in effect, will increase manpower requirements.  The



implementation of these regulations are, primarily, the basis for our



conservative estimate of 1 percent as the average annual rate of growth



in productivity through 1985.



     Major inovations in the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act



enacted  in 1969 are the health standards vhich were enacted for the



first time.  These standards include limitations on respirable coal dust;



control  of rock dust from drilling holes for roof bolts; medical exam-



inations, including chest roentgenogram; noise standards; furnishing



potable water at the working place; and sanitary facilities.



     The law also has standards for ventilation, mining and roof



support  plans, rock dusting, mine maps, blasting, lighting and communi-



cations.  Standards for permissible electrical mining equipment, high

-------
and low voltage electric power transmission,  and for electrical


grounding, and for trailing cables are included in the law.   The


Act also has requirements for fire protection,  including water


lines installed parallel to the entire length of belt conveyors


and rail haulage ways.


     The law further requires that, effective June 30, 1970, each


operator shall continuously maintain the average concentration of


respirable dust in the mine atmosphere during each shift and that


the level of suspended dust to which each Miner is exposed should


be 3.0 milligrams or less per cubic meter of  air.


     Effective December 30, 1972,  the concentration of respirative


dust in the mine atmosphere shall  be reduced  to no more than 2.0 mil-

                                         «
ligrams per cubic meter.  The Act  defines, respirable dust as partic-


ulates 5 microns or smaller in size.


     The mine operator must take the samples  in a prescribed manner and


mail these samples to the Bureau of Mines. The results of sampling


were reported in Bureau of Mines Technical Progress Report 32, April


1971, as follows:  "As of March 1, 1971, ever 152,000 respirable dust


samples have been processed by the Bureau of  Mines„  Approximately


75 percent of underground working  sections are being sampled in ac-


cordance with Federal regulations.  Results indicate that 72 percent


of the sections which have completed at least one basic sampling cycle

                  o
are below 3.0 mg/m , the (present) standard in effect under  the


Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969 (P. L. 91-173).

-------
Notices of Violation were issued on 1,670 underground mines for


failure to begin a sampling program; withdrawal orders were issued


in 64 of these instances.  Notices of Violation were issued on


1,121 sections were applicable dust levels were exceeded; withdrawal


orders were issued in seven of these instances.  There are 381 mining


sections currently operating on permits from the Interim Compliance


Panel."


     The report's conclusions are:


     "Assessment of data obtained from the operators' sampling program


and Federal inspections indicates that th>2 first level of Federal


respirable dust standards is clearly attainable at this time.  Many


coal mines .ire now registering remarkably low respirable dust concen-


trations.  Although previous work done by the Bureau of Mines indicated


that miners working in "high-risk" areas had an average exposure of

        f\
5.6 mg/m , in assessment after 8 months under the act indicates that the


exposure of a significant percentage of such miners is now between 2 and

      O
3 mg/m  .  Furthermore, 45 percent of the working sections which have


completed a basic sampling cycle have dusl: concentrations lower than

        o
2.0 mg/m .  This indicated real promise for the achievement of the


2.0 mg/m3 standard when it takes effect on December 30, 1972."


     In general, the reduction in respiratory dust has been achieved


by more and better water sprays available at the coal face, increased


ventilation  at the face, and better brattice maintenance.


     The Act also requires that dust from drilling in rock shall be


controlled by the use of permissible dust collectors, or by water,


or water and wetting agents.



-------
     In general, after one year from the effective date of this Act,




all low horsepower electrical equipment taken in by the last open




cross cut must be permissible.  This includes items such as hand-




held electric drills, blower and exhaust fans, electric pumps, etc.




In addition, all junction or distribution boxes used for making




multiple power connections must be permissible.




     For coal mines, which have coalbeds above the water table and




which have not been declared gassy, a permit for non-compliance may




be granted to allow the use of non-permissible equipment.  However,




permits for non-compliance will not be given to exceed 48 months after




the enactment of this act.  After one year from enactment, all replace-




ment equipment acquired for use in any mine must be permissible and so




maintained.




     Any coal mine classed as gassy prior to the operative date of




this Act shall continue to use permissible equipment.




     Each operator shall carry out a continuing program to improve




the roof control system.  The roof and ribs of all active under-




ground roadways, travel ways, and working places shall be supported




or adequately controlled to protect personnel from falls of the




roof or ribs.




     The Act states "A roof control plan and revisions thereof suit-




able to roof conditions and mining system of each coal mine and




approved by the Secretary shall be adopted and set out in printed




form within sixty days after the operative date of this act.  The




plan shall show the type of support and spacing approved by the




Secretary.  Such plan shall be reviewed periodically, at least

-------
every six months by the Secretary, taking into consideration any falls




of roof or ribs or inadequacy of support of roof or ribs.   No person




shall proceed beyond the last permanent support unless adequate tempo-




rary support is provided or unless such temporary support  is not




required under the approved roof control plan and the absence of such




support will not pose a hazard to the miners.  A copy of the plan shall




be furnished the Secretary or his authorized representative and shall




be available to the miners and their representatives."--"When instal-




lation of roof bolts is permitted, such roof bolts shall be tested in




accordance with the approved roof control plan."




     In summary, specific measurement of production losses is difficult




at the present.  In Bureau of Mines personnel's conversations with mine:




operating officials, expressions of opinion are that decreases of produc-




tivity may range from 10 to 25 percent.  However, losses in productivity




at individual mines or the closure of marjinal mines appears to have




been compensated for by the opening of new mines, additional sections in




older mines, and increased employment.




     The production of bituminous coal increased from 560.5 million tons




in 1969 to an estimated 596.5 million tons in 1970, or an  increase of




6.4 percent.




     In an attempt to evaluate the effect of current safety requirements




on production per man-hour and per man-day, the estimated  production




and estimated man-hours for the combined months of August  through




December in 1969 were compared with the same months in 1970.

-------
The man-hours estimates were compiled from monthly reports submitted

to the Bureau of Mines from operators producing approximately 80 per-

cent of the Nation's bituminous coal and lignite.   Production data

are estimates based on railroad carloadings and river shipments with

an allowance made for truck shipments and coal used at mines.  We

wish to point out that normally these statistics would not be used

to determine productivity.  However, at this time, these are the only

available data with which we can tend to evaluate this impact.  The

tonnages and man-hours include surface ami underground production.

The tons pe:r man-hour are as follows:
                                               Difference
                          1969       1970     Tons/man-hour
August
September
October
November
?)ecember
2.4569
2.4234
2.4718
2.4669
2.5288
2.4b39
2.3971
2.4703
2.3286
- .0188
+ .0605
- .0747
+ .0039
- .2002
             Average .    2.4694     2.4220     - .0474

The tons per man-hour August to December 1969 period was 2.4694 in 1969

and 2.4220 for the 1970 period.  Based on an 8-hour work day,  the tons

per man-day were 19.76 for the 1969 period and 19.38 for 1970,  or a

decline of 0.38 tons.

     In 1969, 61.9 percent of the coal was produced in underground mines.

Assuming the same ratio existed in 1970, f:he reduction in tons  per man-

day would be:

              .38 +• .619 = .613 tons per man-day

     Based on the average, the decline is a little more than 0.6 tons

per man-day.

-------
     The Health and Safety Act will increase mining  costs  and  the




coal's market value.




     If a company delays ordering permissible equipment too long,




or does not have its equipment made permissible and  maintained in




this condition, a drop in this company's production  will result from




lack of usable equipment.  If this condition becomes widespread,




total coal production could decline.




     Current lead times for equipment purchases such as a  small




continuous miner are reported to be 9 to 18 months.   Current lead




times for conventional equipment was estimated at 12 to 18 months.




One medium size mine has its name on the manufacturer's list for




conventional equipment as far in advance as 1975. This company




plans to replace present equipment within four to five years.

-------
                             Summary




In summation, the following points are emphasized:


     1.  Coals vary greatly in chemical and physical properties and


         one rank of coal can not be generally substituted for another.


         Even coals of the same rank can not be interchanged, in many


         instances, for one another.


     2.  A p?-oblem of immediate concern to electric-utility plants
                          j

         in r.ome areas is the procurement of low-sulfur coals with


         ash-fusion temperatures suitable for use in wet-bottom furnaces.


         It appears that demand for such coals in the near future will


         far outweigh supply.
                                         •

     3.  Manoower needs of the coal industry are expected to increase


         substantially during the next decade and the industry is faced


         particularly with the problem of attracting and recruiting the


         needed manpower at a time when it.? image has grossly deterio-


         rated because of recent mining disasters,  health problems of


         miners, and undesirable working conditions.  A number of inter-


         related factors will, of course, affect requirements, but it


         is estimated that the additional niners that will be needed to


         produce the coal that will be required in 1985 will range from


         a low of 26,000 to a high of 184,000.


     4.  Non-rail modes of coal transportation will, in all probability,


         be adequate to meet the demands placed upon them.  Railroad


         transportation will, however, not be adequate unless the actions


         mentioned in the report, or others, are instituted to increase


         the supply of railroad hopper cars.




-------
5.  Coal preparation and cleaning plant capacity must be

    expanded greatly in order that the coal industry can meet

    the more severe requirements being imposed upon coal quality,

    Presently, from 1 to 2 years elapses between the times when

    initial construction of a coal preparation plant begins and

    the plant is completed and becomes operational.  It should

    be i ecognized that there is a relatively small number of

    coim; anies that construct coal preparation plants and that

    any large influx of orders for such plants will greatly

    extend the time span for delivery.

6.  The Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969 is
                    •                *
    expected to restrict coal availability, principally

    bee luse it is expected to lower productivity and increase

    manpower requirements.  As assessment of the effects of

    health and safety legislation upon coal availability is

    premature at this time because of the lack of data.

-------