United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of
Emergency and
Remedial Response
EPA/ROD/R02-91/163
September 1991
©EPA
Superfund
Record of Decision
-------
50272-101
REPORT DOCUMENTATION 11. REPORTNO.
. PAGE EPA/ROD/R02-91/163
1 ~
3. Redplenl'8 A....on No.
4. 1118 IIIIISWIfte
SUPERFUND RECORD OF DECISION
Asbestos Dump, NJ
Second Remedial Action
7. AuItIor(8)
5. Raport Datil
09/27/91
II.
8. Pwrfonnlng OrganIzatIon A8pt. No.
8. PWrfonnlng Orgalnlzatlon Nama and Add....
10. ProjactlT88klWorII UnIt No.
11. ~cI(C) or Gr8nI(O) No.
(C)
(0)
1~ SponaorIng Organlz8tlon Nama and AddrM8
U.S. Environmental Protection
401 M Street, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20460
13. Type of R8pOI't. "-locI Coverad
Agency
800/000
-
14.
15. Suppl8m8nt8ry No...
111. Abalr8ct (UINt: 200 _rda)
The Asbestos Dump site is composed of four asbestos disposal areas in Meyersville,
Passaic Township, New Jersey. This Record of Decision (ROD) addresses two of the
four properties: the 30-acre New Vernon Road site and the 12-acre White Bridge Road
site. These properties are bordered by the Great Swamp National Wildlife Refuge, and
tracts of wooded and wetland areas. Land use in the area is primarily recreational
and residential. From 1968 to 1971, asbestos- containing material generated by the
National Gypsum Company was disposed of on the New Vernon Road property in a large
depression and in other areas of the property. From 1970 to 1975, asbestos material
was disposed of on the White Bridge Road prqperty in what is now a horse-riding track
and in other property areas. In a 1990 investigation, EPA identified high levels of
asbestos contamination in soil at both properties. Based on this investigation, the
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) issued a Public Health
Advisory, and EPA conducted an immediate removal action at both sites, which included
air and soil sampling for asbestos, covering areas of visible asbestos contamination
with geotextile fabric, removing any aSbestos-containing material located on the
ground surface for offsite disposal, and restricting site access. A 1988 ROD
(See Attached page)
17. Doc:um8nt An8Iyala L Dncrtpto..
Record of Decision - Asbestos
Second Remedial Action
Contaminated Medium: soil
Key Contaminant: inorganics
Dump, NJ
(asbestos)
b. IdentifiarLlOpan-End8cI Tenna
Co COSA 11 R8IdIOroup
18. Avoll8bllty Statement
18. Security CI... (1h18 Report)
None
20. SecurIty CI... (1h1a Page)
1\Innc
21. No. of P8gea
66
I
~ PrIce
(See ANm-Z38.18)
See /MlTIIClioM on RsttetN
(Formarly N11S-35)
-------
EPA/ROD/R02-91/163
Asbestos Dump, NJ
Second Remedial Action
Abstract (Continued)
addressed another site property, the Millington site, as Operable Unit 1 (OU1), and
provided for constructing slope protection/stabilization measures and surface water
diversion channels along and on top of the asbestos mound and installing security fences
and a soil cover. This ROD addresses the asbestos-contaminated soil on both the New
Vernon Road and White Bridge Road properties, as OU2. A subsequent ROD will address the
fourth property, the Dietzman Tract, as OU3. The primary contaminant of concern
affecting the soil is asbestos, an inorganic.
The selected remedial action for this site includes treating approximately 37,000 cubic
yards of asbestos-contaminated soil using in-situ sOlidification/stabilization and
covering the solidified material with 6 inches of soil; conducting confirmatory sampling
of soil, sediment, ground water, and surface water; implementing an air monitoring
program; and implementing institutional controls. The estimated present worth cost for
this remedial action is $5,700,000, which includes an annual O&M cost of $43,400.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS: The chemical-specific clean-up level for soil at both
sites is the Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) detection limit of 0.5 percent
-------
.
ROD FACT SHEET
SITE
Location/State:
EPA Region:
HRS Score:
NPL Rank (date):
ROD
Asbestos Dump site - New Vernon Road and
White Brige Road sites, Operable Unit II
Meyersville, Passaic Township, New Jersey
II
39.61 (March 14, 1991)
512 (March 14, 1991)
Name:
Date Signed:
September 27, 1991
Selected Remedv
Soils:
In-situ solidification/stabilization treatment
technology of asbestos contaminated soils
Direct Capital Cost:
Annual 0 & M:
Present Worth:
$
$
$
4,700,000
43,400
5,700,000
LEAD
Remedial, EPA
Primary Contact (phone):
Secondary Contact (phone):
Potentially Responsible
Party:
Pamela J. Baxter (212-264-5392)
Kimberly O'Connell (212-264-8127)
National Gypsum Company
WASTE
Type:
Soils - The type of contaminant is asbestos.
Confirmatory sampling will be conducted for
the presence of other contaminants.
Medium:
Soil is the primary medium contaminated.
Confirmatory sampling will be conducted for
the presence of asbestos containing material
and other contaminants in ground water,
surface water and sediments.
origin:
The asbestos debris was dumped by the named
-------
DECLARA'1'ION S'1'A'1'BHEH'l'
RECORD OP DECISION
AsJ:les~o. Dump
FACILITY NAME AND LOCATION
Asbestos Dump - New Vernon Road and White Bridqe Road Sites
Meyersville, Passaic Township, New Jersey
STATEMENT OF BASIS AND PURPOSE
This decision document presents the selected remedial action for
the New Vernon Road and White Bridqe Road sites, which are
portions of the Asbestos Dump Superfund site. The remedial
action was chosen in accordance with the requirements of the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability
Act of 1980, as amended by the Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorization Act of 1986, and to the extent practicable, the
National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Continqency Plan.
This decision document summarizes the factual and leqal basis for'
selectinq the remedy for the above described portions of the site
and is based on the administrative record for the site. .
The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and Enerqy
concurs with the selected remedy.
ASSESSMENT OF THE SITE
Actual or threatened releanes of hazardous substances from this
site, if not addressed by implementinq the response action.
selected in this Record of Decision, may present an imminent and
substantial endanqerment to public health, welfare or the
environment.
DESCRIPTION OF THE SELECTED REMEDY
The remedial action described in this document represents the
second of three planned operabre units for the Asbestos Dump
site. It involves the solidification/stabilization of asbestos
contaminated soils at the New Vernon Road and White Bridqe Road
residential properties. A previous Record of Decision addressed
asbestos contamination at the Millinqton site. Remediation of
the Dietzman Tract, located in the Great Swamp National Wildlife
-------
-2-
The selected remedy for the New Vernon Road and White Bridge Road
sites includes the following components:
.
in-situ sOlidification/stabilization of asbestos
contaminated soils;
.
appropriate environmental monitoring to confirm the
effectiveness of the remedy; and
implementation of institutional controls to restrict
future subsurface activities and assure the integrity
of the treated waste.
.
STATUTORY DETERMINATIONS
The selected remedy is protective of human health and the
environment, complies with Federal and state requirements
are legally applicable or relevant and appropriate to the
remedial action, and is cost effective.
This remedy utilizes permanent solutions and alternative
treatment technologies to the maximum extent practicable, and
satisfies the statutory preference for remedies that employ
treatment that reduce toxicity, mobility, or volume as their
principal element.
that
Because the remedy will result in hazardous substances remaining
on the sites above health-based levels, a review will be
conducted within five years after commencement of the remedial
action to ensure that the remedy continues to provide adequate
protection of human health and the environment.
t/i~1
-------
. -
~
RECORD OP DBCISION
DBCISION SUKMARY
'Asbe.~o. Dump.
New Vernon Road and Wbi~. Bridge Road Si~e.
pa..aic, .e. Jersey
SITB DESCRIP~ION
The Asbestos Dump Superfund site includes four separate
properties located in southeastern Morris County, New Jersey and
. is included on the National Priorities List (NPL). The
Millington site, also referred to as the "main site", is located
in Millington, New Jersey. The three other sites are known
collectively as the "satellites sites" and are the New Vernon
Road site and the White Bridge Road site, both located in
Meyersville, New Jersey, and the Dietzman Tract which is located.
in Harding Township, New Jersey.' .
The Asbestos Dump site is being addressed in three discrete
phases, referred to as operable units. A Record of Decision
(ROD) for the first operable unit, the Millington site, was
signed on September 30, 1988, and is currently in the remedial
design phase. The properties of the second operable unit are the
New Vernon Road and White Bridge Road sites, and are the subject
of this ROD. The Dietzman Tract is the third operable unit; the
contamination at this site is currently being investigated.
The New Vernon Road site consists of approximately 30 acres of
land located at 237 and 257 New Vernon Road in Meyersville, New
Jersey (Figure 1). The property is bounded by New Vernon Road to
the west, a portion of the Great Swamp National Wildlife Refuge
to the north, and tracts of wooded and wetland areas to the east
and south. Currently, one residence is located on the sit~. The
owners of this residence also operate a business on site in a
separate building. In addition, an unoccupied dwelling, owned by
the site residents, is located on the site. One private
residence is located directly south of the New Vernon Road
property and another residence is located southwest of the
property, to the south of a tennis club, both of which are
located on the opposite side of New Vernon Road.
The White Bridge Road site is approximately 300 yards north of
the New Vernon Road site and consists of approximately 12 acres
of land at 651 White Bridge Road as well as adjoining property,
which is part of the Great Swamp National Wildlife Refuqe, in
Meyersville, New Jersey (Figure 2). This site is bounded by
-------
Refuge to the east and southeast, Black Brook to the southwest
"and a vacant wooded lot to the west. One priv~te residence is
located on the site. Five private residences are located
approximately 700 feet north and west of the property. An
asphalt driveway ~ocated in the northwest portion of the property
maintains access to a two story dwelling, garage, two sheds and
three stables. A pond, approximately 100 feet in diameter, is
located east of these structures. A horse riding track is
situated in the east-central portion of the property. This track
is approximately 31,250 square feet in size and is located
approximately 350 feet from the house and horse stables. The
property also includes a large grazing field, which is located
west of the horse riding track and wetland areas of the site.
SITE HISTORY AND BNPORCBKBNT ACTIVXTIBS
From 1945 through 1980, the privately owned New Vernon Road
property was used for farming. From 1968 to 1971, asbestos
containing material (ACM) generated by the National Gypsum
Company was disposed of on the site. The ACM included asbestos
fibers, broken asbestos tiles, and siding, that was deposited
throughout the site. Large amounts of ACM were deposited in the
central portion of the property in a large depression. Asbestos"
has also been detected in other areas of property. In 1980,
property ownership was transferred to the current residents.
From 1945 through 1969, the White Bridge Road property was used
for farming. In 1970, the property was purchased by the current
residents. From 1970 to 1975, ACM consisting of asbestos tiles
and siding from the National Gypsum Company, was disposed of on
the property. After these disposal activities, the current oWner
converted the.pro~erty into a horse farm with stables, a horse
riding track, and grazing fields. The horse riding track is
comprised of large. amounts of ACM mixed with soils. ACM has also
been detected in other areas of the site.
The Asbestos oump site was listed on the NPL on september 1,
1983. In September 1984, the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) issued a notice letter to the National Gypsum
Company notifying the company of its liability as a Potentially
Responsible Party (PRP) and offering it an opportunity to conduct
a Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study (RI/FS). On April
1, 1985, EPA issued an Administrative Order to the National
Gypsum Company to conduct the RI/FS at the four sites comprising
the Asbestos Dump site. National Gypsum Company performed
Remedial Investigation (RI) activities in 1985 and 1986
(hereinafter referred to as the 1985-1986 RI). RI activities
were performed at the Millington site and the satellite sites.
EPA performed oversight of these activities. In May 1987,
National Gypsum Company submitted an RI Report to document its
findings. Upon review of the RI Report, EPA determined that
-------
.- -
'----- .-. .-
". . - .- . ~ -. - - .--..' ,'.
while the RI had adequately characterized contamination at the
Mi11inqton site, the RI failed to adequately characterize the
nature and extent of contamination at the New Vernon Road, White
Bridge Road and Deitzman Tract sites. .
In August 1990, EPA collected. and analyzed soil and dust samples
at the New Vernon Road and White Bridge. Road sites. Contrary to
data reported in the National Gypsum Company's 1987 RI Report,
high levels of asbestos were detected. EPA determined that an
immediate removal action was necessary to address the imminent
threat posed by the sites.
On September 21, 1990, the Agency for Toxic Substances and
Disease Registry (ATSDR) issue~ ~ health consultation that
concluded that the New Vern9n Road and White Bridge Road sites
posed an imminent and substantial health and safety threat to
residents and workers. A Public Health Advisory was issued on
December 20, 1990; which recommended, among other things, that
affected residents be dissociated from exposure to site-related
asbestos. .
Removal activities were conducted at both sites in the fall of
1990 to temporarily reduce the potential for airborne asbestos
fibers and to restrict access. The following activities were
conducted at the New Vernon Road site: signs and temporary fences
were erected to restrict access to areas of visible surface
contamination; air and soil were sampled for asbestos; two
driveways were capped on site with asphalt to cover asbestos;
other areas of visible asbestos contamination were covered with
geotextile fabric; ACM was removed from a dilapidated shed
located next to the driveway and the shed was demolished; the
primary residence on site was decontaminated; air samples from
the residence were co11ect3d and analyzed; the lawn area was
visually inspected and ACM located on the ground surface was
removed for off-site disposal.
The following activities were conducted during the removal action
at the White Bridge Road site: signs and temporary fences were
erected to restrict access to areas of visible surface
contamination; contaminated areas were covered with geotextile
fabric; and air samples from the residence on site were collected
and analyzed.
During removal activities in the fall of 1990, EPA initiated an
RI/FS at the New Vernon Road and White Bridge Road sites in order
to fully characterize the nature and extent of asbestos
contamination. Field work was completed in the fall of 1990, and
the RI and FS reports were completed in June 1991. The RI
included extensive air and soil sampling at both sites and fully
defined areas of soil contamination.
-------
'On October 28, 1990, the National 'Gypsum Company filed a
voluntary bankruptcy petition under Chapter 11 in Dallas, Texas.
SCOPE AND ROLE OP ACTION
.'
The Asbestos Dump site will be remediated in three operable
units. The first operable unit is the Millington site located at
50 Division Ave in Millington, New Jersey. EPA selected a remedy
, for the Millington site which is documented in a September 30,
1988 ROD. The selected remedy includes the installation of
security fences and soil cover, slope protection/stabilization
and surface water run-off diversion channels along and on top of
the asbestos mound, and operation and maintenance including
ground water and surface wa~er monitoring. .
The second operable unit, which is the subject of this ROD,
includes the properties located at and adjacent to 237 and 257
New Vernon Road and 651 White Bridge Road. Both of these sites
are located in Meyersvi1le, New Jersey. This ROD addresses
asbestos contaminated soils on both the New Vernon Road and
Bridge Road properties. The conditions at these sites pose
threat to human health and the environment due to the risks
possible inhalation of asbestos fibers.
White
a
from
The third operable unit addresses the Dietzman Tract, which is
located in the Great Swamp National wildlife Refuge in Harding
Township, New Jersey. National Gypsum performed investigations
at this site as part 'of the 1985-1986 RI activities, but site
contamination was not adequately characterized at that time.
Under EPA oversight, National Gypsum initiated a supplemental RI
at this site in May 1991.
HIGHLIGHTS OF COMKUHITY PARTICIPATION
On July 8, 1991, EPA presented to the public the Proposed Plan
for si~e remediation, the RI/FS Reports, and other documents
which comprise the administrative record for the N6w Vernon Road
and White Bridge Road sites. These documents were made available
to the public at the EPA administrative record File Room, 26
Federal Plaza, New York, New York, and at the Passaic Township
Free Public Library, 91 Central Avenue, Sterling, New Jersey.
On July 8, 1991, EPA also' issued a notice in two local
newspapers, which contained information relevant to the public
comment period for the site, the date of the public meeting and
availability of the administrative record. The public comment
period began on July 8, 1991 and ended on August 7, 1991. In
addition, a public meeting was held on July 17, 1991 at the
Passaic Township Free Public Library. At the meeting, the public
was given an opportunity to raise questions and concerns about
-------
- .
... - .-
the site to EPA. In addition, written comments were accepted
during the public comment period. Responses to the ~omments
received during the public comment period are included in the
Responsiveness Summary (Attacr.ment 1), which is part of this ROD.
SUMMARY OP SITE CHARACTBRIZATION
1.
SITE GEOLOGY AND HYDROLOGY
New Vernon Road
"
The New Vernon Road site consists' of unconsolidated sedimentary
deposits that are present throughout the site in various
thicknesses. The existence and spatial distribution of these
deposits is typical of glacial and swamp deposits. A total of
five geologic units were identified during test boring activities
performed as part of the 1985-1986 RI and are presented in
Figure 3.
The uppermost deposit consists of topsoil that varies between
four and seven inches in thickness. This deposit is organic-rich
in the western and central part of the investigated area near
soil borings TB-NVR1 and TB-NVR2 and becomes a finer-grained
deposit eastward at soil boring TB-NVR3.
Asbestos fill is present in the main landfill area located in the
central portion of the site, and throughout the property. This
asbestos fill is most extensive (approximately eight feet in
depth) in the central landfill area and consists of broken
asbestos tiles and asbestos fibers. '
Underlying the asbestos fill is a unit of sandy clay. The unit
varies laterally from a yellow, dry silty/sandy clay to a brown
silty clay and decreases in thickness to the west. It is absent
at boring TB-NVR1.
Ground water data was collected from three monitoring wells at
the site during National Gypsum Company's 1985-1986 RI. The
ground water flow direction and hydraulic gradient were assessed
from the potentiometric map (Figure 4) constructed from ground
water elevation data. Ground water flow direction at this site
is in a southwest to northeast direction with an extremely low
gradient which is indicative of slow ground water flow. Ground
water is flowing through the subsurface asbestos contamination at
this site east toward the Great Swamp National Wildlife Refuge
property. The water table fluctuates from a depth of one to five
feet from the surface. Therefore, some asbestos containing
material is present within the water table.
-------
White Bridae Road
Geologic information at the White Bridge Road site (Figure 5) was
collected primarily within the northern, asbestos landf.illed
sector. Test boring information revealed the presence of three
major, naturally occurring, unconsolidated, sedimentary deposits
of various composition and thickness at various depths underlying
the asbestos fill.
The asbestos fill is comprised of an upper layer consisting
mostly of broken asbestos tiles and a lower layer that is made up
of loose asbestos fibers. Within the vicinity of the riding
track, the asbestos fill is approximately 10 feet in depth and
decreases in thickness outward from this area.
Underlying the asbestos fil! is a layer of organic-rich, black to
brown-colored, silty and extremely fibrous, peat-like material.
This -deposit is thickest in the vicinity of boring TB-WBR3, where
three feet of it is present and pinches out to the north at
boring TB-WBR2, which contains only one-half foot of the deposit.
Beneath the organic-rich deposit lies a deposit of poorly-sorted
silty sand. This sand was the most extensive deposit at the
site. Its thickness ranged from 9~5 feet at the edges of the
site (borings TB-WBR1 and TB-WBR2) to.5.5 feet in the middle of
the site at boring TB-WBR3. This unit consists of brown, sandy
silt, with lateral variations. Samples of this unit at boring
TB-WBR2 consisted of gray, coarse silty sand that grades into
brown, fine silty sand toward boring TB-WBR3. The largest
variation within this unit lies between borings TB-WBR3 and TB-
WBR1. within this area, the unit changes from brown, fine silty
sand to. a brown, fine sandy silt and silty sand unit within the
upper half, to a brown, sand silt in the lower half ,f the
deposit.
A clay unit is present at boring TB-WBR1 at a depth of 10 feet.
This unit is primarily composed of gray, soft clay that contains
laminae of silty clay and occasional lenses of fine sand.
Although this clay unit was not encountered in borings TB-WBR2
and TB-WBR3 due to their shallow sampling depth, it is assumed
that the clay underlies the silty sand unit at a deeper depth
throughout the site.
Ground water data was collected from three monitoring wells
installed at the site during National Gypsum company's 1985-1986
RI. Ground water flow direction and the hydraulic gradient of
this site was assessed from the potentiometric surface map
illustrated in Figure 6. The ground water flow direction is
northeast toward the Great Swamp National wildlife Refuge
property. The low ground water gradient at this site suggests
that ground water movement is very slow.
-------
2.
SITE SOILS
Soils were investigated during the 1985-1986 RI performed by
National Gypsum Company and during EPA's 1990 RI at the New
Vernon Road and White Bri~ge Road sites. During the 1985-1986
RI, site soils were. sampled for various parameters including
volatile organic and inorganic compounds. No asbestos sampling
was performed on site soils at that time. EPA's 1990 RI included
extensive soil sampling to determine the vertical and horizontal
extent of asbestos contamination at the sites. A grid pattern
was established at the sites and sampl~ng was performed
systematically to assure comprehensive sampling. In addition,
soil borings were installed to determine the depths of ACM on the
sites.
Soils samples were analyzed 'for asbestos by one of two analytical
methods: Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) , or Transmission
Electron Microscopy (TEM). The PLM method is less sensitive than
the TEM method and was used to analyze samples with high levels
of asbestos as determined by visual observation. The method
detection limit for the PLM method is 1 percent asbestos. The
TEM method is the most sensitive available method (i.e., can
detect lower levels of asbestos than the PLM method or any other
available method) and was used to analyze samples which were not.
observed to contain visible asbestos contamination. . The TEM
method can detect and quantify asbestos at levels of 0.5 percent
or greater.
New Vernon Road
During the 1985-1986 RI, four subsurface soil samples were
collected and an~lyzed at the New Vern~n Road site (Table 1).
Although the data collected does not indicate high levels of
contamination by volatile organics, base/neutral compounds or
metals, data quality concerns necessitate additional sampling and
analysis of these parameters during the remedial design phase to
confirm these findings.
. .
Asbestos sampling of site soils was performed. during EPA's 1990
RI. A grid pattern was developed to accurately assess the extent
of asbestos contamination on the site. A total of 188 surface
samples were collected and analyzed for asbestos. Shallow
subsurface samples (a total of 112) were collected at five
different depth intervals and were analyzed for asbestos
(Table 2).
The surface area containing greater than 0.5 percent asbestos is
approximately 95,130 square feet. Figure 7 depicts the surface
areas of detected asbestos contamination. The total volume of
soils containing greater than 0.5 percent asbestos located on the
site is approximately 15,800 cubic yards.
-------
White Bridae Road
During the 1985-1986 RI, four subsurface soil samples were
collected ~nd analyzed at the White Bridge Road site (Table 3).
Although the data' collected does not indicate high levels of
contamination by volatile organics, base/neutral compounds or
metals, data quality concerns necessitate additional sampling and
analysis of these parameters during the remedial design phase to
confirm these findings.
During the 1990 RI, a grid pattern was developed to assess the
extent of asbestos contamination at the site. A total of 133
surface samples were collected and analyzed for asbestos. EPA
collected 70 subsurface soil ~amp1es at four different depth
intervals (Table 4).
The surface area containing greater than 0.5 asbestos is
approximately 85,600 square feet. Figure 8 depicts the surface
areas of detected asbestos contamination. The total volume of
soils containing greater than 0.5 percent asbestos located on the
site is approximately 21,300 cubic yards.
3.
GROUND WATER
During the 1985-1986 RI, three monitoring wells were installed at
the New Vernon Road site and three at the White Bridge Road site.
The monitoring wells were located along the perimeters of the
asbestos fill areas (see Figures 4 and 6). In addition, ground
water samples were obtained from potable wells which were located
in the vicinity of the two sites. These wells were analyzed for
volatile organics, base/neutral compounds, phenols, pesticides
and metals (Tables 5 and 3). Sampling results from both on-site
and off-site wells indicated no significant ground water
contamination by any of the above constituents at either of the
two sites. However, data quality concerns associated with the
analytical results necessitate additional sampling during the
remedial design phase to confirm these findings.
All ground water samples were analyzed for
tion. None were found to contain asbestos
the reported analytical detection limit of
liter (Table 7).
asbestos contamina-
concentrations above
100,000 fibers per
4.
SURFACE WATER AND SEDIMENTS
As part of the 1985-1986 RI, two surface water and two sediment
samples were collected from a drainage ditch located downgradient
of the New Vernon Road site (Tables 8 and 9). Three surface
water ~nd three sediment samples were collected from Black Brook,
in the vicinity of the White Bridge Road site (Table 10 and 11).
-------
Two of the three surface water and sediment samples were
collected downgradient of the site, the other surface water and
sediment sample was collected upstream.
Surface water and sediment samples were analyzed for volatile
organic compounds, base/neutral compounds, phenols and metals.
However, EPA cannot make final determinations regarding the
status of surface water and sediments based on the data collected
due to data quality concerns associated with the analytical
results. Therefore, additional sampling will be performed during
the remedial design phase of this project.
At the New Vernon Road site, the two surface water and sediment
samples collected were analyzed for asbastos (Table 12). Neither
of the sediment samples contained detectable asbestos. One
surface water sample did not contain asbestos above the detection
limit. The other surface water sample contained asbestos above
the detection limit, however, the level detected was low (below
the Maximum contaminant Level (MCL) established for asbestos of
7,000,000 fibers per liter).
At the White Bridge Road site, the three surface water and three
sediment samples collected were analyzed for asbestos (Table 13).
None of the sediment samples contained asbestos above the
detection limit. The three surface water samples all contained
detectable levels of asbestos, however the levels detected were
low (below the MCL established for-asbestos).
5.
AIR
Ambient air samples were taken and analyzed for asbestos fiber
concentrations during National Gyp&um's 1985-1986 RI and during
the 1990 field investigation.
Results from National Gypsum's 1985-1986 RI indicated that all
air samples at the White Bridge Road property boundaries
contained asbestos concentrations below the method detection
limit of 0.01 fibers per cubic centimeter (cc) by analysis with
the Phase Contrast Microscopy (PCM) method. At the New Vernon
Road property, two samples contained asbestos concentrations
below the method detection limit. One sample and its duplicate
contained asbestos concentrations of 0.014 and 0.032 fibers per
cc, respectively.
A total of 83 air samples were taken during EPA's 1990 RI at the
New Vernon Road and White Bridge Road sites (Tables 14 and 15).
Air samples were collected upwind and downwind of specific
locations on the properties and from personal protection
equipment. Of the 83 s~ples, 54 samples were collected from the
New Vernon Road site and 29 samples from the White Bridge Road
site. Air concentrations of asbestos ranged from 0.000 to 0.063
-------
-fiber per cc and 0.00 to 0.012 fibers per cc at the New Vernon
Road and White Bridge Road properties, respectively. All air
samples were analyzed using the PCM method.
SUMMARY OP SITE RISKS
EPA conducted a baseline Risk Assessment (RA) to evaluate the
potential risks associated with current and future conditions at
- the sites. The baseline RA estimates health risks which could
result from contamination at the sites if no remedial action is
taken.
Asbestos was the only contaminant determined to be present in the
air at the sites as a result of soil contamination. The maximum
concentration of asbestos detected in the air at each site was
used in the RA and is listed in Table 16. -
The exposure pathways evaluated in this assessment represent the
major current land use as well as future land-use exposure
pathways. The inhalation of asbestos in the air was evaluated -
for adult on-site residents. CUrrent land use for both sites is
residential. Future land use is assumed to remain residential.
,
Asbestos has been given an "A" classification by the EPA,
denoting a human carcinogen. The basis for this classification
is the observation of increased mortality and incidence of lung
cancer in occupationally exposed workers across study
populations. Due to lack of toxicity data on potential
noncarcinogenic effects, only carcinogenic risks posed by
asbestos were evaluated in the RA.
Potential carcinogenic risks are evaluated using the cancer unit
risks and/or slope factors developed by the EPA for chemicals of
concern. Cancer unit risks (URs) and slope factors (SFs) have
been developed by EPA's Carcinogenic RA Verification Endeavor for
estimating excess lifetime cancer risks associated with exposure
to potentially carcinogenic chemicals. A unit risk establishes
the relationship between the dose of a chemical and the response.
The UR (Table 17), which in the case of asbestos is expressed in
units of (fibers/cc»1, is multiplied by the asbestos
concentration in units of fibers/cc, to generate an upper-bound
estimate of the excess lifetime cancer risk associated with
exposure at that concentration. The term "upper bound" reflects
the conservative estimate of the risks calculated from the UR.
For known or suspected carcinogens, EPA considers excess
upperbound individual lifetime cancer risks of between 10~ and
10~ to be acceptable. - This level indicates that an individual
does not have an additional chance greater than one in ten
thousand to one in a million of d~ve10ping cancer as a result of
-------
site-related exposure to a carcinogen over a 70-year period under
the specific exposure conditions at the site.
. The cumulative upper bound risks ass~ciated with potential
exposures to maximum asbestos concentrations in air at the New
Vernon Road and White Bridge Road sites are 1 x 10~ (one in a
hundred) and 3 x 10~ (three in a thousand), respectively (Table
18). These upper bound risks are significantly greater than the
acceptable EPA risk range.
Actual or threatened release of hazardous substances from this
site, if not addressed by the preferred alternative or one of the
other active measures considered, may present a current or
potential threat to public health, welfare, or the environment.
To address risks posed by airborne asbestos, EPA has established
a remediation goal for contaminated site soils, which are a
source of airborne asbestos. Since any detectable levels of
airborne asbestos may pose an unacceptable risk, the source of
this contamination should be remediated to the maximum extent
achievable. Therefore, EPA has selected the TEM method detection
limit of 0.5 percent asbestos as a remediation goal because this
will result in treatment of the maximum amount of asbestos
possible. The selection of this remediation goal is consistent. '
with the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution
'contingency Plan (NCP).
UNCERTAINTIES
The procedures and'inputs used to assess risks in this.
evaluation, as in all such assessments, are subject.~o a wide
variety of uncertainties. In general, the main sources of
uncertainty include:
- environmental chemistry sampling and
- environmental parameter measurement
- fate and transport modeling
- expo~ure parameter estimation
- toxicological data
analysis
Environmental chemistry analysis error can stem from several
sources including errors inherent in the analytical methods and
characteristics of the matrix being sampled. Uncertainty in
environmental sampling arises in part from the potentially uneven
distribution of chemicals in the media samples. In this case,
the RA was based on maximum detected asbestos concentrations.
Uncertainties in the exposure assessment are related to estimates
of how often an individual would actually come in contact with
the chemicals of concern, the period of time over which such
exposure would occur, and in the models used to estimate the
-------
concentrations of .the chemicals of concern at the point of these
sites assuming exposure of 365 days per year.
These uncertainties are addressed by making conservative
assumptions concerning risk and exposure parameters throughout
the assessment. As a result, the RA provides upper bound
estimates of the risks to populations near the sites and is
highly unlikely to underestimate actual risks related to the
site.
DESCRIPTION OF ALTBRHATrvBS
. .
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and
Liability Act (CERCLA), as amended by the Superfund Amendments
and Reauthorization Act, requires that each site remedy selected
m~st be protective of human health and the environment, cost-
effective, and use permanent solutions and treatment technologies
to the maximum extent practicable.
At the New Vernon Road and White Bridge Road sites, the remedial
objectives focus on controlling the migration of asbestos. The
remedial measures evaluated were designed to address the
potential public health risks posed by the sites. Based on the
data collected during the RI, a range of alternatives were
developed to address asbestos contamination at the sites. These
alternatives are presented in detail in the FS report and are
summarized below.
The time to implement each alternative listed below represents
actual construction and treatment time frames, where applicable,
and does not include the time required to perform remedial design
activities prior to construction. All alternatives.except the No
Action alternative would include confirmatory ground water,
surface water, sediment and soil sampling.
Alternative 1: No Action
Capital Cost:
Annual operation and
Maintenance (0 & M) Costs:
Present Worth Cost:
Time to Implement:
$ 0
$ 0
$ 0
~A
The NCP requires that the No Action alternative be evaluated at
every site to establish a baseline for comparison to other
alternatives. Under the No Action alternative, both sites would
remain in their present condition, with no remedial effort
implemented. Access to both properties is currently not
restricted. No measures to mitigate asbestos migration or reduce
contaminant concentrations would be taken. The selected cleanup
-------
level of 0.5 percent asbestos would not be attained under the No
Action alternative.
Alternative 2: Native soils/Veaetative CaD
Capital Cost:
Annual 0 & M Cost:
Present Worth Cost:
Time to Implement:
$ 1,200,000
$ 210,000
$ 1,700,000
6 months
Capping the ACM on the sites would reduce the potential Qf direct
human contact with contaminants at or near surface grade, and
would reduce the continued migration of asbestos into the air.
The caps would be constructed of approximately two.feet of
topsoil from an off-site source. The caps would be seeded with
vegetation to minimize erosion.
The caps would be maintained to ensure continued performance.
Inspection of the caps would be performed on a monthly basis, and
occasional mowing would be necessary to preclude the
establishment of deep-rooted vegetation which could compromise
cap integrity. Berms would be constructed and maintained to
manage water run-on and run-off from the capped areas.
Inspection and maintenance of the caps would be conducted
indefinitely.
Institutional controls regarding future construction and other
activities' on the sites would be necessary to ensure the
integrity of the caps. .
Alternat~ve 3: ACM Excavation and Off-Site Vitrification
Capital Cost:
Annual 0 & M Cost:
Present Worth Cost:
Time to Implement:
$ 20,100,000
$ 43,000
$ 24,700,000
, 7 months
This alternative calls for the excavation of all ACM detected
above the cleanup level at the sites (approximately 37,100 cubic
yards). Excavation activities would be conducted using proper
dust suppression controls and containerization of wastes. In
addition, it may be necessary to erect a temporary structure to
enclose areas undergoing excavation to control airborne asbestos.
ACM would be placed in roll-off containers and would be sealed
with plastic sheeting to ensure containment of ACM.
containerized ACM would be transported approximately 250 miles to
an off-site vitrification facility.
To implement this alternative, it would be necessary to construct
ground water collection trenches upgradient of the excavation
-------
.- .-
-'------" -- ----- _._--- ----.------- --,.---. - -
. .
.areas on both sites. The trenches would divert ground water flow
around the excavation area to allow dewatering. of the ACM, some
of which is located below the water table.
In the vitrification process, ACM is electronically heated in a
glass-making furnace. A mixture of the ACM and waste glass are
fed into the unit and heated to approximately 2,600 of. Asbestos
is thermally decomposed and rendered non-toxic by the
vitrification process. Following vitrification, the fragmented,
glass-like material could be used in several applications,
including road surfacing. After excavation, the sites would be
backfilled with clean soil and graded.
Alternative 4: In-situ Solidification/Stabilization
capital Cost:
Annual 0 & M Cost:
Present Worth Cost:
Time to Implement:
$ 4,700,000
$ 43,000
$ 5,700,000
10 months
.'
In this alternative, ACM would be treated in-situ (in place)
using a cement-based sOlidification/stabilization process. This
alternative would limit the mobility of ACM by binding it in an
insoluble matrix. All ACM above the cleanup level of 0.5 percent
asbestos would be treated. Approximately 21,300 cubic yards of
ACM at the White Bridge Road site and 15,800 cubic yards of ACM
at the New Vernon Road site would be treated in-situ.
The solidification/stabilization technology consists of a batch
mixing plant that supplies a slurry feed of cement and .
proprietary chemicals, and a soil mixing system which delivers
the slurry feed a~d mixes it with the waste materials in situ.
The treated material would exhibit a volume increase of
approximately 10 percent. In addition, after solidification, the
sites. would be appropriately graded and a minimum of six inches
of soil would be placed over the solidified material. After
implementation, air monitoring would be performed to demonstrate
the effectiveness of this alternative.
Institutional controls regarding future construction and other
activities at the sites would be implemented to ensure the
integrity of the solidified material.
Alternative 5:
ACM Excavation and Off-Site Landfill DisDosal
Capital Cost:
Annual 0 & M Costs:
Present Worth Cost:
Time to Implement:
$ 12,900,000
$ 43,000
$ 16,000,000
8 months
-------
The components of this alternative which relate to excavation
procedures are the same as those described in Alternative 3. The
major difference between Alternative 3 and Alternative 5 is the
fate of the excavated ACM. In Alternative 5, all ACM detected
above the cleanup level would be transported and disposed of in
an. approved landfill. After excavation, the sites would. be
backfilled with clean soil.
StJHHARY OP COMPARATIVB AJlALYSIS OP ALTBRHATIVES
The alternatives identified above were initially evaluated on the
basis of technical effectiveness and feasibility, public health
and environmental effects, institutional issues, and costs, as
presented in the FS. Subsequently, these alternatives were also
evaluated using the following criteria derived from the NCP and
CERCLA, as amended, as presented in the Proposed Plan.
OVerall Protection of Human Health and the Environment evaluates
the ability of the remedy to provide adequate protection and
describes how risks posed through each pathway are eliminated,
reduced or controlled through treatment, engineering controls or
institutional controls.
Com~liance with ARARs evaluates the ability of an alternative to
meet applicable or relevant and appropriate requirements (ARARs) -
established through Federal and State statutes and/or provides
the basis for invoking a waiver.
Lona-term Effectiveness and Permanence evaluates the ability of
an alternative to provide long-term protection of human health
and the environment and the magnitude of residual risk posed by
untreated wastes or treatment residuals-.
Reduction of Toxicitv. Mobilitv or Volume Throuah Treatment
evaluates the degree to which an alternative reduces risks -
through the use of treatment technologies.
Short-term Effectiveness addresses the cleanup time frame and any
adverse impacts posed by an alternative during the construction
and implementation phase, until cleanup goals are achieved.
Implementability is an evaluation of the technical feasibility,
administrative feasibility, and availability of services and
materials required to implement an alternative.
Cost includes an evaluation of capital costs, annual operation
and maintenance costs, and net present worth costs.
State Acce~tance indicates the State's response to the
alternatives in terms of technical and administrative issues and
concerns.
-------
Communitv Accebtance evaluates the issues and concerns that the
public may have regarding the alternatives. .
A comparative discussion of the seven alternatives on the basis
of the evaluation c:t"iteria presented above follows..
OVerall Protection of Human Health and the Environment: The No
Action alternative would not provide adequate protection of human
. health by eliminating, reducing, or controlling risks posed by
ACM. Alternatives 3 and 5 would achieve cleanup levels, but
involve ACM excavation, which presents short-term risks due to
fugitive dust emissions caused by disturbance of surface and
subsurface ACM. Alternative 4, sOlidification/stabilization,
would provide a high degree of protecti?n and attain cleanup
levels without excavation.o~ waste materials, with some limited
short-term risks due to ACM disturbance during implementation.
This short-term risk is expected to be significantly less than
the risks short-term posed by Alternatives 3 and 5. Alternative
2, capping, would provide some degree of protection because it
would reduce the release of airborne asbestos. Alternative 2
poses less short-term risks than Alternatives 3, 4 and 5 because.
it involves no disturbance of subsurface ACM.
Com"Oliance with ARARs: Alternative 1, No Action, leaves wastes
untreated on site above the cleanup level. Since the potential
exists for asbestos to become airborne, this alternative would
not attain ARARs or cleanup levels for the site.
Alternatives 2,3,4 and 5 could be implemented in compliance with
the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants and
other ARARs.
Chemical specific ARARs are health .Qr risk based concentration
limit or ranges in various environmental media for specific
hazardous substances, pollutants or contaminants.
Chemical-specific ARARs for asbestos in soils have not been
promulgated. The cleanup level established for soils at the
sites is the TEM detection limit of 0.5 percent asbestos. The
two alternatives which include excavation, Alternatives 3 and 5,
as well as Alternative 4,' sOlidification/stabilization, are
expected to attain the selected cleanup level in the long term.
However, since these alternatives disrupt subsurface ACM to
varying degrees, stringent controls would have to be implemented
during remedial activities to assure compliance with ARARs for
airborne asbestos concentrations.
Alternative 2, capping, would cover all asbestos above the
cleanup level, but would not treat the asbestos, as would
Alternative 4, or remove asbestos, as would Alternatives 3 and 5.
-------
Lona-term Effectiveness and Permanence: Alternative 1, No
Action,.does not offer long-term effectiveness or permanence.
Alternatives 3 and 5, excavation with off-site vitrification and
landfilling, respectively, would provide the greatest long-term
effectiveness and permanence .for the sites since ACM is excavated
and transported off-site for treatment or disposal. These two
alternatives require no residuals management.
Alternative 4, sOlidification/stabilization, offers a high degree
of permanent treatment of ACM on site. Although the waste
remains on site, it is expected that this remedy would achieve
long-term reliable protection by immobilizing the ACM.
Alternative 2, capping, reduces risks posed by airborne asbestos
through containment. The degree of permanence achieved would be
less than Alternatives 3, 4 and 5, since untreated waste remains
on site. In addition, this alternative would require continual
maintenance and institutional controls to assure its long-term
effectiveness. Furthermore, ACM, through the annual freeze/thaw
cycle, could migrate through soil to the surface.
Short-term Effectiveness: The potential risks posed by the site
remain unchanged, and the remedial response objectives would not.
be achieved for the No Action alternative.
with capping, Alternative 2, :isks to remediation workers may
occur during cap construction due to surface soil contamination,
but potential risks would be lower than the short-term risks
posed by Alternatives 3, 4 or 5. Remedial response objectives
could potentially be achieved in approximately six months.
Alternatives 3 and 5 would pose the greatest short-term risks.
These alternatives would pose similar short-term risks due to the
common elements of excavation and transportation of large volumes
(approximately 37,100 cubic yards) of ACM. The activities would
require full disturbance of all surface and subsurface ACM, which
would increase the potential for mobility of asbestos in the air.
This would increase the short-term respiratory risks at the site.
For Alternatives 3 and 5, remedial response objectives would be
achieved within seven months and eight months, respectively.
Alternative 4, in situ sOlidification/stabilization, would pose
some short-term respiratory risks, but risks are more
controllable than with Alternatives 3 and 5. Disturbance of
surface and subsurface ACM would occur, but to a much lesser
degree than excavation. Remedial response objectives would be
achieved within ten months.
ImDlementabilitv: Alternative 1, No Action, requires no
implementation of remedial measures. While Alternative 2,
capping, would be easily implemented since capping construction
-------
methods are well.developed, the presence of wetlands on the sites
would require a high level of maintenance. Erosion and soil
movement in a wetlands environment would continually contribute
to degradation of the cap.
There would be some difficulties in the implementation of
Alternatives 3 and 5 because excavation of ACM must be carefully
managed to control short-term risks. In addition, the excavation
. alternatives would require excavation of ACM below the water
table. Construction of trenches would be required to control
ground water flow during excavation activities. Controlling such
flow during excavation can be complicated and will add to the
difficulty of implementing Alternatives 3 and 5. Further, the
off-site vi~rification component of Alternative 3 poses other
problems in that the availability of the vitrification system is
extremely limited as this is a currently developing technology.
Alternative 4, solidification/stabilization, is fairly easy to
implement because ACM would be handled on site. This technology
has been employed at a number of hazardous waste sites. The high
water tables present at the sites are not expected to be .
detrimental to the implementation of the solidification/
stabilization process since the process requires the addition of
water. Various tests performed on. cement based agents reveals
that the cement mass will continue to. harden while submerged in
water for many years. While a treatability study would be
performed to confirm the technology's effectiveness for treating
the site-specific ACM, no significant technical problems are
anticipated.
The sites would be able to accommodate the estimated volume
increase resulting from this treatment. While this alternative
is more difficult to implement than Alternative 2,
solidification/stabilization would be more easily implemented
than Alternatives 3 and 5.
Reduction of Toxicitv. Mobilitv or Volume: Alternative 1, No
Action, provides no reduction in toxicity, mobility or volume of
ACM.
. "
Alternative 3, excavation and off-site vitrification, provides
the highest degree of long-term reduction of toxicity, mobility
and volume by removal of the ACM from the sites and the thermal
destruction of asbestos at an off-site location. However,
Alternative 3 along with Alternative 5, excavation with off-site
landfilling, provide the greatest potential for increased
mobility of asbestos during remediation. While Alternative 5
would reduce the toxicity, mobility and volume of asbestos in the
long term at the sites, it does not treat the asbestos.
Therefore, the risks are reduced "at the sites, but the toxicity
and volume of the asbestos would not be reduced permanently.
-------
Controls utilized by the approved landfill would provide a
reduction in mobility of the ACM.
Al'cernative 4, sOlidification/stabilization, would provide a
reduction in ACM mObility through immobilization. The risks
associated with the' asbestos would be significantly reduced since
it would be bound in an insoluble matrix and no longer available
for uptake in the environment.. Treatment by in-situ
sOlidification/stabilization would increase the volume of the
initial untreated materials by an estimated 10 percent.
Alternative 2, capping, would reduce the mobility of ACM through
containment. Stringent cap maintenance procedures must be
employed to assure c~ntinued reduction of mobility in the future.
No reduction in ACM toxicity or volume would be obtained through
this alternative. '
Cost: The No Action alternative is the least costly, but most
detrimental to human health and the environment. The estimated
present worth cost of each alternative is as follows:
1) No Action .
2) Soil/Vegetative Cap
3) ACM Excavation and
Off-Site Vitrification
4) In-situ stabilization/
Solidification
5) ACM Excavation and
Off-Site Landfilling
$ 0
$ 1.7 million
$ 24.7 million
$ 5.7 million
$ 15.5 million
The costs to implement Alternatives 3 and 5 are much higher than
for the other alternatives. The higher short-term risks
associated with Alternatives 3 and 5, coupled with the
implementability difficulties of Alternatives 3 and 5 and the
lack of treatment associated with Alternative 5, make these two
alternatives less cost effective than Alternatives 2 and 4.
Alternative 4 is cost effective since it achieves remedial action
objectives and a similar degree of protectiveness compared to the
excavation alternatives and at a lower cost. Further,
Alternative 4 is cost effective compared to Alternative 2 as it
offers a much higher degree of long term protectiveness and
permanence. .
State AcceDtance: The New Jersey Department of Environmental
Protection and Energy has concurred with the selected remedy.
Communitv AcceDtance: Based upon public comments addressed in
the Responsiveness Summary (Attachment 1), the community
generally concurs with the selected remedy.
-------
. SELECTED REHED)r .
The selected alternative for remediation of asbestos
contamination at the New Vernon Road and White Bridge Road sites
is Alternative 4, sOlidification/stabilization. This remedy will
treat ACM with detected levels of asbestos of 0.5 percent or
greater (approximately 37,100 cubic yards). The asbestos will be
immobilized in an insoluble matrix. Accordingly, this treatment
will significantly reduce the risks posed by airborne asbestos at
the sites. In addition, after solidification, the sites will be
appropriately graded and soil will be placed over the. solidified
material. Institutional controls will be imposed to restrict
future surface and subsurface activities which could affect the
integrity of the treated was~e.
SOlidification/stabilization will provide a high degree of long-
term effectiveness and permanence, will reduce the mobility of
asbestos waste, and is implementable in comparison with other
alternatives evaluated. The selected alternative is cost
effective compared to the other alternatives evaluated.
..
As part of the selected remedy at the sites, a treatability study
will be performed in the remedial. design phase to provide site
specific information for the performance of remedial design
activities. In addition, a wetlands delineation and assessment.
will be performed at the sites. All efforts will be made to
minimize impacts to wetlands in implementing the selected remedy.
Confirmatory sampling will be conducted at the sites for ground
water, surface water, sediments and soils to assure the absence
of significant contamination by organic compounds, base/neutral
compounds and metals. If upon further sampling, it is determined
that there are chemical compounds present at levels of concern,
appropriate actions will be taken to address the contamination.
In addition, ground water, surface water and sediments will be
sampled and analyzed for asbestos to confirm the results of
previous sampling.
Upon implementation of the selected remedy, an air monitoring
program will be. implemented to assure the absence of unsafe
levels of asbestos contamination at the sites. .
. .
The selected alternative presents the best balance with respect
to the evaluation criteria and will meet the statutory
requirements of CERCLA section 121(b): 1) to protect human
health and the environment: 2) to comply with ARARs: and 3) to be
cost effective. The selected alternative utilizes permanent
solutions and alternative technologies to the maximum extent
practicable and satisfies the statutory preference for treatment
as a principal element.
-------
. - . ---. -. .
. . - -. --.-- -
A review every five years will be conducted to evaluate the
effectiveness of the remedy for the sites for a minimum of 30
years.
STATUTORY DETERMINATIONS
Under Section 121 of CERCLA and 40 C.F.R. 1300.430(f) of the NCP,
selected remedies must meet certain statutory and regulatory
requirements. These requirements and a description of how the
selected remedy satisfies each requirement are presented below.
Protection of Human Health and the Environment
The selected remedy will protect human health and the environment
through treatment while also meeting ARARs and minimizing short-
term risks. .
ComDliance with ARARs
The selected remedy has been developed to meet Federal and State
ARARs for asbestos. .
Cost-Effectiveness
The selected remedy provides effective treatment of contaminated
soil and is cost effective compared to other alternatives. The
treatment methods included in the selected remedy are expected to
attain cleanup goals at the Asbestos Dump site.
Utilization of Permanent solutions and Alternative Treatment
Technoloaies
EPA has determined that the selected remedy utilizes permanent
solutions and treatment technologies to the maximum extent.
practicable. This determination was made based on the
comparative evaluation of alternatives with respect to long-term
effectiveness and permanence, reduction of toxicity, mobility or
volume through treatment, short-term effectiveness,
implementability, and cost, as well as the statutory preference
for treatment as a principal element, and state and community
acceptance.
State and Communitv AcceDtance
The State of New Jersey concurs and the community generally
concurs with the selected remedy for the Asbestos Dump, New
Vernon Road and White Bridge Road sites (Operable Unit 2).
-------
'DOCUMENTATION 'OF SIGNIFICANT CHANGES
The Proposed Plan for the second operable unit remedial action at
the Asbestos Dump site was released for public comment on July 8,
1991. The Proposed Plan identified Alternative 4 (solidifica-
tion/stabilization) as the preferred response action. All
written and verbal comments submitted during the public comment
period were reviewed by EPA. Upon review of these comments, it
was determined that no significant changes to the remedy, as it
, was originally identified in the Proposed Plan, were necessary.
-------
FIGURES AHD TABLES
-------
-- --r
. N86'12'1..-W
1,198.48'
, GREAT SWAMP NATIONAL v"LDUFE REFUGE
"
~_:9'''.':.:
, 89.90'
~.
N88'12'148W
\322:00:
, 00\\\.0
" BF1LlED . .
.~ POND
. AREA'
II) DM...G
~ DIRT ~
01. ROAD
o
Z. 0.,
~ t-I
.~ ~
Z 01
o ~
. Z . ,
~ ~\
~ .
o
.e"o
~
98'03'008E
104.92'
904'43'008J!:
--
262.98'
rn
..I\)
Gill
~ 01
, 0. g
~. .
=14
i .
,
LEGEND
884 '27'0088
1,013.73'
--
--
. ---
---
---- PROPERTY UHf
--
SCAlE
~
o 100
I
200 .
I .
JOO FEET
, '
- -
- -
- -
- -
-
- -
- -
- -
HART
--~
, rot
.
. or
.Pt ~
..., .
'" If)
~ ~
!lAIN u.ru M£A
I
I
/
,411
00 .
./.,
~ I\.
fl'
I
I
N
f4
8G
. 10
Ulf'S
f!J
I ,
-n.
G)
.C
:n
m
~.
, I
, .
FIGURE l'
. . SITE MAP
NEW VERNON ROAD SITE
-------
c=. - - ----
--
.=- DIRT PA1H -
I -
\~_.--'~
~I \ ~ "-'--'7
I :0: I- \ ~
\ ir \. . . _. / .I
I ~ I - GRAZING fiELD / 210.60' - ~ /.
I "I ~\I :. + - I
Ua / . I
\!i\ '--'~l"" . /'. !J~:;@
~ - ~o- / . Jt .J]
I I 2 STY. L-J' / - m
I 0\\\.0. . . - -' . . . i5 I\) -
. - - LJGAA. STABLE, . i. . . . Y
-0---- - - ~06'00'00"m .' . /.
. . 0 ' . - - - 7-45.00'
L£GftlQ' - ~~ -- ---~ '
- -
- --- PROPERTY LINE 9 0- -
. .--- - WOOl) H UCE' ~ j;
r-r::
:
-------
, .
"
E
E'
fT AUOVE MSL
235 -
TO-NVR 1
TB-NVR2
I
TO-NVR3
220
230
. .
. "
.. .
.
221
:i:.......=-!:-~-~
=~.....:r~~
I
8CAlE IFEETt
~";:"':"-~::-r~---J
.~~~~-- ,
,~ " '/ .
, \,,---- ' /j
\ "1.~t /' 'I
,~r' "WIPe ,
~ J_" -. ~,=::_-----,
TOPSOIL
,0
100
ASIESTOS FILL
IAHD
FIGURE]
GEOLOGIC, CROSS-SECTION E-E'
NEW VERNON ROAD SITE
IAHDY CLAY
IAHDY pur
....----
f ~-=--
- .-.- ... ...
.., -
'"'~-
FRED C. IIART AISOCIATES, INC.
:!J
G>
c
:n
m
(,J
,
"
-------
GREAT SWAMP NATIONAL'WllDUFE REFUGE
r=. - - - -NOO'U!'14." - 1,100.";;"-
53"30"30..
. 89.00' .
. ~ '
;,0"
.
N08"12"14.W
~22:0e:
ODWlG
\ .
\ 0 FILLED '
~ POND
AREA
~ QDWlG
:i DIRT U
01. ROAD
o
~ ~\~
~
7. G
o 0
7. :-I,
~ t.,
b
~
90"03"00-1:
104.82"
504843800.8
--
2112.808
IA
...1\1
..'"
.dI
GO
.0
. .
~
WiUIl
--
---- PROP£RTY UNE
.Inf--' MONITORING WEll lOCA 11 ON
,-. UJ D"".' EQUIPOTENl1Al LINES
X In). GROUNDWA fER [lEVA 11 ON
~ APPROX'LtA1£ GROUNDWATER
n.OW DIRECl10N
--
884"27"00.8
1"013. 738
--
--
SCAIL
~
o 100
I
200
I.
JOO FEET
UW-IMIJ
.
XUU.1
--~
. I'
o 10
,'" 0
ot 1 .
I" :f
~ (OJ
MAIN I.NIOfU. MfA
N
.
O.
o.
. 10
:coj
~~
--
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
HART
/
/
/
.41/
00 8
8 /.,
~ It;;
fl'
I
I
N
FIGURE ..
GROUNDWA TER fLOW MAP
NEW VERNON ROAD SITE
FRED C. HART ASSOCIATES,
f
:!!
Ci>
C
:0
m
.,.
,~-41
-------
OF
n ABOVE MSL
:1351
TO-WBR 1
230 -::
u.
220
21.
-----~-::-::- :...- r.::.- - .~
, ._.::'~~-~.]
, ,r-- .0-" - .---
. /. - -.
. ., <-...- . . --,--.
,',' ..::..-J . 7
't' \ .."
:" "- 0_- '. ./-ral-....../
,'\ '- - ' ~
'- ' j;
,I , tY ,. '/I
i L..~ Jraf1-.__/ ---;r ,I
-. - J~/
---. ..... I. r
-_..-- -----"'- ~.
-e__.... ---- .
-==-=- ... MIl ...:"--
r-;~.. r -....-..
.~!..~~.~~c
.J
F'
TB-WBR2
"TI
G>
c
:0
m
U1
0'
TOPSOIL
ICAl! (FEn.
ASIEITOS Fill
SILTY lAND
o
tOO
PEAT
---
---
- ---
CLAY
.
! ~;:t
SILTY CLAY
FIGURE 5
GEOLOGIC CROSS-SECTION F-F'
WHITE BRIDGE ROAD SITE
._---...___0 -
_._.~RED C, "ART ASSOCIATES ;"C,
-------
-
--
I .
N <:1----<=::I
~
-- ----
..133.0 - -
. .......,. . 232.5
., , , .,. ~..... ........................ ""'~~~~.o-""""'''''''''' .
" --- -- .............. ......-13\.5
--- .,. . ",,"".
\ \ ~ /' . . ~. - ~W-";~<'J6. - - . ~ - . -
, ,\ <- POND ., .. ' - . 7
, ~'\ . , ----- ./ /
. \ ~ l' ~\ '/ :.'0.00-. ~' /:
~ ~\. ~ GRAZING .{i~lD . : ~/ 218.60' "
'0' / / ~': .
.,'
,{ , n~ StY. Cj .. / : :~ @
" Li"''' a . - ~." . ~.'::!-~ I / dt . i::
- ---
UW-WORI
DIRT PA nf2JJ.44 x .
805-00'00".,
- - - 990.74'
~UW-WBR2 - - -
2J1.66
,
J
- - 745.00'
--
--a-.-
-----
L£GEUQ
. .
-
- - FIGURE 6 I
- -
GROUND WA IER FLOW MAP.
- - WHITE BRIDGE ROAD SITE
-
- -
HART FRED C. IIART ASSOCI"-~S. INC.
- --- PROP£RTY UNE
....--. MONITORING WELllOCAnON
- . - WOOD r£NCE ...."133.0'" CONTOUR INT£RVAl
)(233,44 CROUND WATER ELEVAT1ON'
SCALE
~
-------
'0
ftI
o
a:
c
o
c
"-
CD.
>
~
z
---
.
[2'Z2)
9{
I
\ DWlG /
I Garage
-----
- -
I
I
) ."
-.
CQ
/ 'C
...
/ CD
.....
/
/
/
/
- ---- _J
Figure 7
Areas o' Asbestos Contamination
New Vernon Road Site
L
- ----
I
c-1.
- ----
Property line
T est Boring location
Areas 01 Detected Asbestos Contamination
-------
---
.
)( )(
rzza
---
TB-WBR1
9{4C.
~
"C
ca
o
a:
CD
OJ
"C
0i:
m
CD
-
0-
.c
==
!'!
cc
C
""'I
CD
Q)
DWlG
I Gara~ [1
~
--
--
Property Une
Test Boring Location
Fence
Areas of Oetected Asbestos Contamination
Figure 8
Areas 0' Asbestos Contamination
White Bridge Road Site
-------
- -
TABLE 1
SUMMARY OF PRIORII'Y POIJ..UTANT DATA
TEST BORING SAMPLES
WHITE BRIDGE R.OAD SITE
Sample Number
WBRI WB1U WBR3 Trip Blank
4. $88 10 18 9/24/86
Volatile Organics (uelke>
Me:hylene Chloride 54B S9B 3IB 29B'.6B
Trichlorofluoromethane 31 31
Chloroform 2JB 2JB 10JB 71B 21B
Benzene 8JB 91B
Toluene 2JB 2m 8JB 71B
Base Neutrals (u;'kl)
Naphthalene 3J
Die:hyl phthalate 13m 12JB 69JB
Di-n-butyl phthalate .165 2.700
Bis-2-ethylhexyl phthalate 311
Phenols (mclk.l Q.54 1.02
MeWs (mgllel)
Antimcmy 32N 19N 84N 70N
Arsenic 6.4SN [l.8]N [S.O]N
Beryllium [l.O]N
Cadmium 2.3N
Chromium IaN lSN l1lN 71N
Copper 328N 228N 438SN 168N
Lead 8.98N 7.28N 548SN 3.28N
Mercury 1.16* 4.2*
Nickel 32.N 22N %7lN 162N
Zinc "eN 438N l1S8N 107N
4. ALUANCE
-------
TABLE 2
Analytical Results Survey-New Vernon Road
Grid Point
SampRng Depth
Date (1nl:hes)
Analytical
Technique
TEM PLM
.. AsbflftOS .. Asb8SlOS
Comment~.
N 500 E 1100 -11/7- 6 0
. ,".~:..y.',....:. ..tI(:::...~~;:::.~... '"..; ,~~~ ~~~~:. .... -..~
N 500 E 1200 -'1/7- 6 0
";::~;.,.., : ~".:..:. :'#-;'~.';,""'::;..:,.;:: :!.'~::~ .~Z'"
N 500 E 1300 -1117- 6 0
':~";...':' .~ '0:..:....:... .~ '~«"~":,;o,«-;~ :.~:
N 600 E 1100 -'117- 6 0
. ..,.,..;. ~::'.:._' :::;~':""'::::'~' :~~~:~ ~~ ~~- ~-.
N 600 E 1200 -1117- 6 0
N"700'. ':'E:'7'O.O""". :.:::;:116=--n \'=.:"6\= .::-'0-. ~~~~, ',;'-=='!:.---A~;;YX;;".':':':.'"
:':.'." ....t~' ,<:"".'$:""0;.;":": ,(p.- ,'::~J»..:~:; ';$$~~-'" ~ -:;;;":;" ,~-~~;~;;;;;:!;'~-i'~'::.:
N 700 E 800 -11/6- 6 0
N 700 E 800 -11/6- 18 0
:... '"I'JI....'-;....""""'" ...... :...:.~~::=::';:"..,:~~ .:'~"*"'::::IICc!oo(' .".." """~.:.OC:~.;C'::'~:-""":":",:~,:,,".
N 700 E 900 -11/6- 6 0
. .'", .. ...:. ..,:.:.:.,:..:.::::"::"~.::. ..:::':':"::'::X:~:::":."::.::::::.~~:!':?:;';f. :;:~~~-:""'X.:;;:';:':;;.;:. ,:,~~~~;:":.:::".:~:;,.~,:.~,,,,,,,!::;':',,;,:',
N 700 E 1000 -1117- 6 0
.' ".. ;~:;:,:":::. ,:::::' "'::::~~;'~::. .:;.::...::'.~~ :,;;;,"~';":!--;iWi6o.~::I~:'-:' .~';.... ~ '~,"~~::':":;:""":::"""';;':"';';"": ...'",
N700 E1100 -1117- 6 0
'" 'o., ".", ., . :;:":"'~::::':~,:;':::,":""" ""':''"-:~~''.; :;o"'e::.,.x:$;';::>.:'~\.~\.~..:;!.»'.:, : ,:-',:::,,:;.,:";"~~:::: ,::.;.,:::~~:'.:,...N..~. "':;.::'," "
N 700 E 1200 -1117 - 6 0
","" '-'"'' ","...."" .'1' '-"'''....,.- ',,,,.,.'~-),.' .. "~'~'IC¥..:<......." 0""'(""''':«'''''''.<0:-,.""",.....,-,.(0'''''''''' .;.''',
N 700" E 1400 :1 "i8~ ... 6. ... .... . o. .. ..... .. Latj.'t>u.plicaie .
N 700 E 1400 -11/8- 6.... ...... ~ ....... ....... .. Lab Duplicate ..
n ,:...'y;":.. ':..."'1'.".'. ",;,,".:.~.;., """:"<,......,-!:,:-:,:,:~',.,.,,,, ,"'. .',"'" '. .
N 750 E 300 -11/5-'" 6 A 0 Field Duplicate
N 750 E 300 -11/5- 6 B 0.. ... ... .. Field Duplicate
,.., : '." ,.. . . ",..J.'..' ",.. n." ",:~...,"';-:".'_: ,,""':.--:~,::;;:I"'(" " ...,.. ,'.",' ,.," ..'
N 750 E 450 -11/5- 6 0
., .," ,'. ,.. '::.:::':'~.:.. 'I!N'''', "No:" ",:~'!::;:. :'~"',~:'~:'11;."':;':;;:":Jf.;:~."'" ..' ':~::':.,......:.:-:...'" .'
N 8CO E 250 -11/5- 6 0.007253
.. ", ""n.:..'.':: '..','," ,,:-..,.,' .,....... ....' :",,,,,«,;,:,::,:.':.......', ," :..:-,~"'" ' ,,'
N 800 E 362 -11/5- 6 0
.. " ":"""":::..,:' .. ':f"~':::~':,'.;t.:':::'.:.:~:" ',~~-x;:;;,;t.:;;::.,.,..,., .. ,".-:::~.:-W'::'"::';;~:'''",,,''''''
N 800 E 700 ..11/6- 6 . 0
n', .. ... ::". ':,;:":':":~;.:.~';:;', .:.;:i:$:";;"1."!;'~:':',£:''''.',::: ... W::o..,...,,,..,,'
N 800 E 800 -11/6- 6 0.000358
..o. '. ....' ...'" ','''' ""'.:"'. ,';,':_,-:'.:';'.::':;: ':'::,,:::'::"~':«y::',::':-~"
N 800 E 900 -11/6- 6 0
N 800 E 900 -11/6- 18 0
.. ..,. .;'.. ,::, .#IOC:." ......,.'" ,,,,,,,,",,::';"'....:...;::"~ ......:.,....~ ""1', ..:' ,.,.~: .::-'.'''''
N 800 E 1000 -1117- 6 0 Lab Duplicate
N 800 E 1000 -1117- 6 . 0 Lab Duplicate
... ,y'" ,," "';:::';",:.:,,'::}:~' ~:.',.'t$.':'~:. ,:~~..:..,....v~ .~'::;':..:':.;,s.; "~::;,,,,,,::,,,,,,,,,,"'.~ '"
N 800 E 1100 -1117- 6 A 0 Field Duplicate
N BOO E 1100 -11n- 6 A 0 Lab Duplicate
N 800 E 1100 -11n- .6 B 0 Field Duplicate
~ 800 E 1100 -1117- 18 A 0
.".. ';. :: ... .."'.'.'.' ,-- '''':!~..~:'f'':u;:;. .'.~.:;.',":::.~ "::~,;~~! -~.,... '," '.. ,,"',.. ''.t'. ~~
N 800 E 1200 -1;17- 6 o.
.. ,'." "..,." ..~:. :-'::"..,;,;..~ ':..'~-":::.::~:'.~:"c.:~W; :;}.':::::~~:"'}"'~::"" ,:"",,,,.,'.".':'..~:';~'..
N 800 E 1300 -11/7- 6 0 .. .... ..
,..-', "'-.':-....-.1',.' ..';';'Ao.....:.:,........:,::-;.(.;.~-.-..~,~:-~~ .~-~.. : ",,;..,,:~,,,,,,,,,""-"" ~..,._.
N 800 E 1400 -11/8- 6 .0...
=..
,'C.,.......
Y.~.
ItrJ 1 1
~ .,...A¥Jn'fIiiJ*':'
,- I ;...nu ':C41 m Q m~*~~::o)""....:-;..,
.:=::= .. ~.
_._.,\,!.-:-.~.",
..
".. .~'. "
-
Pl.M - Polarized Ugh(MiCrosCoPY: TEM - TransrTUSSlon l=Jec:ron MicroSl%JPY
TEM Method detection limit is 0.5 %. PI.M detection Umit is 1 %
IJ. AWANCE
-------
- -
I
. -
Grid Point
N 800
N822
..
N 900
N 900
N 900
N 900
N 900
N 900
N 900
N 900
N 900
N 900
N 900
N 900
N 900
N 900
N 900
N 900
N 900
N 900
N 900
N 900
N 900
N 900
N 900
N 900
N 950
N 950
N 950
N '000
N '000
N '000
Analytical
TechniQue
TEM PUJ
~ AsfJesr:$ ~ AsbeS1cs
',:"'..., "'" ,:.:.::: .........~";-:;~" ...~~...,.;....~ .;,;;f~~;,.x;=... ...;.-;-;.;.::..'...:..'/0........:.........",,'
E '450. ..,,:J,~,{~= :,=..,~=,. ;=--=~, ,- .'-.'''''''''' ~, ..,; ",,~~.'.,.~.~~~~:~
E 600 -'1/6- 6 0
-. ..-:..... "':;'~!:::,=,!,:."",;-t.":':':;~ ~~*...~ ':;~:""'..._...,~-";;".... -'--'..4.:..,~'~. ."~'':~':~~;~~<::''"»'':~'
E 250 -11/5- 6 0.00138'
E 250 -11/5- . 18 0
.. "'''..~. ...._;-::::::::.";': :-"*111" I: A!u.m ~~:::':""MN. :UITV
E 300 -, '/5- 6 0.OC.:!97
E 3S0":~'~,',~i~:':" ~'~6i;~I" lOOY0364''''~:t~=~ Fi~;ld"6~Pii~~-;~::""':'
E 350 -1115- 6 B 0.004047 Field Cupllcate
E 350 -'1/5- 18 A 0
':...;,..:. ';~~ ":,:", .,.~:~-::~ ...:" :'''''''''':. .. . ~:.$!:~~_.~$'::."'::~' '.' ..
E 450 -1'/5- .,.. ..~ . 0.000917
.. ... ..,.......,":'..... ....................-".::~:.~::.::~.....,: .."'~""
E 500 -11/13- 6 0.000598 lat) Cuplicate
E 500 .. -'11' 3-:. . .:::::;~:..;..<;.., .. "'u"-;""" ~...:..<:: ":"""",~,;::::,,',,-,,,::::,, L..a..C .C.~~.l!.~ate .......
E 550 -'1/9- 6 0.001201
E 600 -, '/5-.. ..... 6 .. "".:;;''':''':':''.''0'';'':';' ,:~-:',",".",'"".':'~".. "'.::. ....... ~.... .,.
.. '.", ........ ,- . . .. .;;':<.:..;:~":;:::::.~.~;'::.::. .. .,..
E 700 -1'16- 6 A 0 Field Cuplicate
E 700 -11/6- .. 6'. e .. ""'. ..0.. Field C~plicate
.. "..< "... .",'.. ".,'" ,.'" ". ..',' .-
E aoo -,U6- 6 0
E SOO -11/6- 1S 0
"','" ..:"",,""',
E 900 -11/6- 6 0
...
-, ..,', '..
E 1000 -1116- 6 0
E'OOO -"16- 6 0
: " .. ',";.. . ;" .' - " ...- . ,",.. . ~.
E 1100 -11n- 6 0
" ,'....'."." .. "'.. ..... ".'
E 1200 -'1n- 6 A 0
E 1200 -'1n- 6 B 0
E 1200 -'1n- 18 A 0
",,:-;.,......"'. ,"', .."... .... :
E 1300 -11n- 6 0 Lab Duplicate
E '300 -"n- 6 0.000858 Lab Cuplicate
.~ .;...,..:.:,,::. ",' ...~.~.'~".. "';":''''. ,:"~"""""""'" ", ......."',-
E300 -11/6- 18 . 0 .....
-, ....x:~ ..-.," .:::":;:";.Y'''''.'..''''._.'~: .."...:;.:"-
E 400 -1'/6- 18 0
. '''',,' ,"" :~:~.t-'.::;,:"... '''~,'::--:,,':.. ::~:-~''''':i..~' ""'... '...,;
E 1450 -, 1/8- 6 0
.." ....,..-,,~._..'.....'. _n""",',,,,",-
E 250 -1115- 6 0.000938
E 250 -11/5- 18 0
E 250 -'115- U 0
TABLE 2 (continued)
. Analytical Results Survey-New Vernon Road
Sampling Depth
Cate (lnt:has)
.:,,:::.:,.."" -.
,. ,',,,"... ..-
'., ".. '..
. .'.N'..... ""..
...
..
Comments
..~ ....,:.::x~~o:~..,;.o.o.:.tW(~',,"
...
','
..
..
..
Ub Duplicate
L,at) Cuplicate
...'
..
..
Field Duplicate
Field Cuplicate
..
. ..
.. '... ,"'''.'
Lab Cuplicate
Lab Cuplicate
PLM - Polarizea Light Microscopy; TEM - T,.nsmission Electron Miaosccpy
"rEM Method deteCtion limit Is 0.5.%.. PUt4 detection Umit Is , % .
!J~~.. ~~~~5J
-------
TA8LE 2 (continued)
Analytical Results Survey-New Vernon Road
Analytical
TechniQue
TEM pJ.M
96 AsDastC$ .. Asb.stM
/II 1000 E 300 -"/5- 6 0.00329'
N1000 'e'350':co, :;:',;i~ ~XYf~'!~' 0:'0'05827 "~,,'...
N '000 E 350 -"/5- 18 0
..,. '.:'~'!:::~d:~~~;""~'-"".' .":"n~~r....-.- "'~~-:~~'-;~'
N '000 E 400 -"/6- 6 0
'. . . -,y.",,#":';;::~.$4;'.. e:t.~'t'~ :;':;'W;'""""'V:-":w.~ '. .;..--..4f....." ..-:::/II.~ :~z'}.~~~~:.:::~.~.~:
N '000 E 450 -"/5- . 6 0
N 1000 E 450 -"/5- 1e 0
.. . ',......,'."" '.....', ....- .;::-.':'~-:':~:~~"""Jo ... .' ... ~. ;u Lilli. "U ::""'!:
N '000 E 550 -,,/8- 6 30
::::;;~: y:~.:.:::~:r;:;. ~''''/'~~::~ ~_CN,,:.;,...:;:;::A;::~~ ~.__d""".,.-v,,,,,="=;::::1"",:;.;:':::.",
N '000 E 600 -"/5- 6 0.0'365'
N '000 E 600 -"/5- '8 '.0524'
.. .. .. . ... ,:"''''.;:. ...v::;' '. -' .."""'~~"".--:>:,.:. ,::,"-~.-Y'1:~~~'~ .;-o:....~:' '.::;;:;,,~:;':;;';":.:... "
N'OOO E700 -"/5- 6 0
: .. ... .. '. '."" :. ':{'..:';o(..o:'=X~:' '.; .:,"""''';~~'::.~-:.:-,!;'~',,~ .~....w.;.;.':.:;;".:'.:~:'~- .....:;;..Yt:~~~,;~~;~::::. " ...n:
N '000 E 800 -'1/6-. ..6.. ...., . 0... .''''' .,. .,. ...... .. .,
.. ". ""',. ,':I'" ,," '.. ,~,.,.".,'''~ , Y'o,...-.:(:-tt'...«.;(.", ,,~""'~"''''''''''''''-''''''''' ..', ..~..~,)«1,=,:.,:::'_"'" ...
N '000 E 900 -, '/6- 6 0.000235
...'" .. .::-- ."":"'.,-::.::. .. ";....:"::..",:". :....~(o$(.'~:;;:~(!' -"".::~".~. . ':'... .::..::..~.;(::;~~""',,!~~.,.~. ....,.~.;
N '000 E' 000 -, '/6- 6 0.000'90
'''':.~.}: '~~,,!,,:;..:; ;.:.t:.::~. :.:.~';':,,,,,,,,,: . 'No'... """,,::'::,,~,"':.:':.'o'~~~-"
N ,oeo E" 00 -, '/6- 6 0.42'462
.. ..... .. '." .;.U'-~ .' "".' :""OC.~::.:"': .,:.,...;.-.. .. "". y: :-". .y:.....r
N '000 E '275 -"n- 6 0.34893'
. .. .." .::. ", ':.'. ',' .. '. .. . ' .:...'(. »:.:,,~ :' .;: .' ..':' .....' . .. ....'.
N '000 E '500 -"/8- 6 0
.. "... . ......".:.'; ..':.'. ',..n'_.. .."'" :.":",.,,,,,,;,~:,,,'".{.';:"'"
N '02' E 395 -"/9- 6 0
..'e.""".'." ...;' ... ".....;~:".~".:;''','''' .. . """..
N '037 E 550 -"/8- 6 A
N '037 'E 550 -"/8- 6 e
N '037 E 550 -"/8- '8 A
N '050 E 300 -"/6- '8
'.. """"",.,,~,,;'
N '050 E '500 -,,/8- 6
... :......
N '050' E '550 -"/8- 6
.'; ,"N>. .."<':-:.
N '062 E 429 -"/9- 6
N '062 E 429 -,,19- 6
N '062 E 429 -"/9- 24
. '" #,: ...::~.:::"..~.::
N '063 E 300 -"/9- 6
; .. y~' .. ......,,-,~ .#,..,::,...,::.:..'-"""::0.. ,~~:~:":-",,,,".'.' .::~~'...........'::'"
N '07' E, , 00 -'1112- 6
.... .::. :~-"
N '095 E 300 -"/5- 6
N "00 E 250 - ,ii~':~ -.. e''''A
N "00 E2S0 -"/5- '8 A
.. ., ,.,"'..;'"'' ....' '
N "00 E 300 -"/5- 6
Grid Point
sampnng l Cepth
Oate (1ndI8S)
~mments
U'.'.~ ,;;':'M ~~~..:'~~~
.
..
.-.::.,..,.."................' ..
20
20
Field Cuplicate
Field Cuplieate
, .048996
..: .....
o
n"::::" ....
o
o
0.00047'
o
o
.-... '. ,,vf,':::': -:~,:".
o
--;'::::"';'.'''.:;.' "',' ..":~ ." .... ..'.'"
."-:«<.1\00 ':0';".
;.:Y'''. ...::~..........." .~.......- ...:,,"'"
..
.': '''''.' .. ":~;':"':":::.
.."
..
.. ,"....'..'
.'.'"
L.ab Cuplleate
L.ab Cuplleate
~:",:;::";.':::
.....,. .~..~._:X'!t'{~'.~"''''''''' ...
~-...". ';QC'y ,'~~"::"";." ::,'''.:' "~x~~~,:~"",:,, ,.,
0.030'89
0.00'02' ....... :.'~''':.;, '..":. ...'::. :.",,,,'~.-:"';"~"'"'...""" . .'"
0.000'96
" "'.""'.' ,.-.... ......~,,;;,r:.,:~:::..:. ..:..:~.t.;( ;';1:."'- ...:;:.:~~.~,...,:..;,;.......;. ..
0.002288
'0
PLM - PQlarized Ligl7t MicrosCOPY: TEM - TfIlIsmission Electron MicroscoPY
TEM Method detection limit is 0.5 %. PLM detection Umit Is , % .
-------
TABLE 2 (continued).
Analytical Results Survey-New Vernon Road
Grid Point
Sampling Depth
Date (1nt:has)
Analytical
TechniQue
TEM I PI..M
.. AsbeStas .. AsfJastM
Comments
".. ,,':':':.~y'...':.~.::.::-;..:.:. ..:''":.-';'':£'::;;'='::;'' '..::~~~~":.::~:~~~~ ~~.....~..._...,......:;;;,,: .......;.......;.:'.:...i;~.,....,,;,,.-.;':.:.o.-.":.....:--..
N "00 E 350 -'1/5- 6 0 La!:) Duplicate
N "00 .~ ~SO.. .... . :~!!.~._. 6 0 ~..~~p.!!.~!!__.._.
." .~........~.....~..' ::.,';".:....."..",...-- .~...~........_. .--. - """,,-,-,,'.", '-'"
N "00 E 560 -'119- 6 < 1
N "00 E 560 -11/9- 24 0.335926
-...' .' :", :.'" ...~';;;'"$;;.z;:..:.~;.::.-.::::" ..'!"~ .:';"':::J:-:":.~"::"'~"-"
N "00 E 600 -,,15-. 6 0.288803
..", .. ,-" "":*X~'''~''~"WIII ._~:.:~ ~:~
N "00 E 600 -"/~ 6
.. .:.::-~.~.:,:..'''''~;;'''''' ...-
N "00 £700 -1119- 6 A
N"OO E700 -"/9- 6 e
N "00 E 700 -'119- 24 A 0
... ..~..............._... :.;. !':...~.;,::,,>:~r:'. ::,:,~'OA .;,~";:;:;::';'v(':''{.W;YO:~{Y:'''.'' :'. ':f'o".~'-::'''..I)".''''''t:::.!:'~':'.;: ...' '. .'"
N "00 £ 800 -"/6- 6 3
,- ,,;,,::,," .:..::..:"~" '.~~:-~:."'~~~:- .::*~';,o;;.':'$$!-.:.--:::7:'!'$;: :~::;::t~:;'"z~~~,;,. .:$.:'. .:~... :'.. ::,.:,,:,;-::,}':.".:.:'. .;.:'" '''' :.""
N "00 E 900 -"/6- 6 0
N '100 E 900 -'1/6- 6 A 0 Field Duplicate
N "00 E 900 -~Y6- ..........!,.,,~. .",,,xc""'''''...''':''''' ::.--::::....;:.:~>".:.::: Fie~~ .~.~?!i.~at.e....
N1'00 £950 -""2- 6 5
N , '00 E '250 ~:~):p~:~".:.'.':!:::::... ~~:~.~~~'2'.. ~~ .::::.:::~:::'.~:~::::.::.:::.,"~: '..:.,..,......:.' '..
N l' 00 E' 500 -11/8- 6 0 Lab Ouplicate
N "00 E' 500 -'118- e 0 Lab Ouplieate
N "00 E' 500 - 1118- '8 0 Lab Duplicate
N "00 E' 500 -'1/8- 18 0 Lab Duplicate
.. .... .." ...~...,... ,........ .. :~';y.)~;.:':<...~'"':.~'~':':'';;: ';:::?;.""N.".....::..:...::;~:.:::.;:.::.~:;'
N,,28 E800 -""2- 6 A '0 Field Duplicate.
N "28 E 800 -".~'2- ....~,....~..." ."::~'.'...""" ..,«"::"w. ,.,~,.::::.., ~eld Du~!icate ..
N "40 E 3S8 -11/6- , 8 0.099888
N "50 E207 -,',j6- ."''6':.:.:;6.. ......::...,....W. ..... ."'-":.."......:.."...".'..::";..' Freid Duplicate ..
N "50 E 207 -'116- 6 S Field Duplicate
N "SO 'E 207 -1116- 18 A 0.0"45
..'.. .'...:...,';".;;;;,;.."';. .::~...:v:-;.;;~..:N:::::".."';~'!::" -';':"$,w.~.'!"':".":~::;;'.:;':.:. .. '... .... ..
N ,'SO E 23S -'119- 6 0
n. ..~,::..,.:'''",,: .:::!'S~~;."':: :""";,::;"~"";.;.:,:,::::,,,,:"~:~~,,,~.",,,...:,,-#":'.: ,,:~*:.,"~:';:..:::":':".'v#'
N "SO £2S0 -"/9- 6. O. .
.. "'''(.~:'''::.:''.'' ..:;w;#":.~:-»O(x.,.::. ,~w~:::-~: .~....,..x~ ::'M;"""""""-".';'''-'''''-.-'''':
N "50 £ 300 -",6- '8 0.0'0848
N USO E 300 ~~j}~.::':~::: .:::::::<:~::: .:=;:'=:::~ ..... :..:.::::...':.~.:.:,,::.- "~...
N "50 E 450 -"n- 6 0.032446
.. , '"'' .._.;~~,;..~:: .,;.';'."...;~~';f.;......:~'::Yw' :z:so....:.":".;;.:;.:.;"'C~..;.;,;:.:;;" .. ..,. .:.....oc-;.o;.:..::: ." -. .,
N 1150 E SOO -1'/5- 6 0
.. ". ,,:..~t( ..::.~......""""'''''~: .....ooM=-,~.....;::.'.::":"''''C:-:: .... ''''''..-' ..).;"'.-..-'
N"SO £700 -'1n2- 6 <1
PLM - Polarized Ught MicrosccPY; TEM - Tr.nsmiS$ion FJec:ron Microscopy
TEM Method detection Omit is 0.5 %. PLM detection Umlt is , 1M!
...... :~~;.~..__.::.......~_...
.'.. at ~'M:. II
-.....
<,
o
o
,,"".~ ."!"..~"--' .::::::0,.. ..::""'''''-»,'
Field Duplicate"'.. . .
Field Duplicate
...
-------
= -
TABLE 2 (continued)
Analytical Resr.:lts Survey-New Vernon Road
AnaJyticaJ
Tec!'lniQue
TEM PUJ
...~t:II!I .. Asb8Stt:ll!l
N 1150 E 700 -"/12- .24 C
.,.......;:.',.,..;.1'0"'."..,.....,,,, .....~......,...~.;,:.':'~ ,-"",,»,""""!"'~ ...~...., "~;' ,":~"="'" .~'':".:''.
N 1150" 'E.&OO.w, '~':1'1is:."'-"6' ._..' 15
,:,:';;';,::;;,;,:"'::. :.:.:~~... :'::~::!X';:.;.,;.~t.. .!::::::::r.:':.~~ ~. ,..W",#o..~J."":r. .V$S---- ..~.-:."t ~:,~~""Z~~.~::::A:'
N11S0 E1550 -11/8- 6 0.001233
.. ,"- .....'...."" ...~::w.,.::.'" :.:~::!..:. '.~::.~:'. :.~w...;;;:~= ~~~~~. '!:~.'SUII-'''--::..~~.:.~::~'.:':.
N1173 E322 -1118- 6 <,
.'~ 1173 E 322 -"/8- 72 0
"""'," ... ., ;,.;,. ..~:;:...:::::.;"'.~.: ::~"O(> .~ -. I ..... x
N 1181 E 250 ...11/8- 6 5
N 1190 E465. -11n;' :;;':';;':'6""''':;;::=-~O -~_..:;;. ..~=~;;;.=:x:.,,,.
N 1190 E 465 -11n- 24 0.000351 ;
-. .. ""0' . ,'.. ..", " ...;...r..;;;.:'''':'_:'':'':~~''!:- '::;....:.:"~:;'::::>;';::'.'':..,.~''.:~:.;i', ..,..,...:. . .:.:,:.,:.:::~........v:,.,,:.. ..
N 1190 E 1165 -11/12- 6 10
.. ..~, ,.,.. .: "':::....o.:Y..'W'~Y:~:~' ",,!N,:~'.;":"-~1':'!-.:.:"'::;':'~";';',':':'" .,."",..:::......:....~.....,,_. ::':~:::: . '," ,;."
N 1200 E 207 -11/8- 6 A 0.016912 Field'Ouplicate
N 1200 E 207 -11/8- 6 B 0.001853 Field Ouplicate
N '200 E 207 -11/8- 18 A 0
. .' , . .... ,,' " "".0""'; -:,..-~:,.:..........". .::~ ,-:,:,:~~:I"':'::~""''''''- ....:-::......~~.." .....--::u.,.'. ....
N '200 E 225 -11/13- 6 0.013128
,. J.. ..:.. :..n ."": '.~: ,::,,,,,,,::,,,:,,,,,.~~:."':'.:;':::::,"':."
N 1200 E 250 -11/8- 6 0
. J""'.~':':;''''. '><'V.~-:: ..;.::;._.:. ':;.:..:.:" " ::~'.'~';':..,,:: .~ .-........
N 1200 E 293 -11n- 6 < 1
N 1200 E 293 -1117- 72 0
.. . , ".1'.' 1'".. ..i$N' :..
-------
. -.-- . .--.
.-. ---------. --- . ~ - -_...
. .
TA8L~ 2 (continued)
Analytical Results Survey-New Vernon Road
Grid Point
Sampling Depth
Date (If'IdIes)
A,.p\alyticaJ
rrechniQue
TEM PLM.
* A$)8StC$ .. .4s011STCS
N ,2S0 E 250 -'1/8- 6
"'.-u" ", '. ... .,. ,"":('::_N',""'- ..~'"' ~
N '250 E 300'" ":""'17: N 6"'-" 0
N '250 E 300 -11/7- 24 0.053087
N '250 E 300 -11/7- 24 0.000146
N '250 '£:"'35'0 '::;;;6~~'! ~"i'$<$,:':, "'~=.""~"o
.. ..,....,:..:,.~::...'tI'::...v..:.::,.:::-:.:;;:;;:;;:;.::;.:,""t:;":,,:~~_...
N 1250 E 390 -1'/7- 6 0
., ,..', ..:o..,-,,,,,,,<,:"~,,, ,,+:;':':-:':'.2"._;::"'.(': :.:~~;<<<»M '':~'' ......
N 1250 E 400 -1116- 6 0.000481
,""'.:' .... .,:.:ft..,~:,-:~".:...y :;,;;;;..:;:t:;;",":'!'-:: .-:,:,~:;.~-."';'~ ~."''''''''.- ,~::"",:::..~.~,~:;:,::.:.:.:'
N 1250 E 450 -1'/7- 6' 0
N 1250 E 450 -11/7- 24 0.000334
". :, .:;'';'(;~'''':.:'::''':4'''' .:x..i.:;";';:;""::";;~""~,, ..":t:-- :..=.;:,::.~,,:,.~_.~~~:' .":":'~.' ~:::.:"."'..:::1:;,(<:':
N 1250 E 500 -11/5- 6 0 .
.. ;', ',,'.'..,.....'.'. .... '.:~W,f;,~~..':'::; .,;~;..:.,:-:":W. ,~;;:;,,,,,,,::',.:'::."'~~~~~ ,.:~,;~;:~"....~~~:_::v:,~,,~,.,,;
N12S0 E800 -11/12- 6 0 . .. .......
" . :.""'. ",...',.-,. -~-;.:,-*"",;:....:::: AM:':-"'''::...-.x~.u,p.'¥.'!''':' .~~';;::': ~:-""'~~":',":>":'. '.:;" ;-:,.~.
N 1250 E 900 -11'12- 6 0
.'. ..'oW .... . '.:~'.~:~' ',', ,..".".." ..~.~~..:~~" ',','''' .,
N 1300 E 350 . .1116- 6 . 0 Lab Duplicate
N 1300 E 350 -1116- 6 0 Lab Duplicate
,.. .. .-:;.' ..',",:;:".":' ,. , ' . ,., ," .. ..~.:.:.,. ,-:».. " ...."
N 1300 E 400 ."n- 6 0.017067
N 1300 E 400 -"/7- 48 0
N 1300 E462 -"/7- ""6 0:'000,'27' u... ..',." ...,~'""",,,,: "', ". X:.",-",,,.'''o''
.. .':0::.:"":.: ,.... "-=;:;«.:;:'''' '. ':':::'......::..:.'~::::' ~',:;.'~~ ~,..:~'...c,,:'.~~~'~:::t-(,.
N '300 E 600 -'1/5- e 0.000448 Lab Duplicate
N 1300 E 600 -'1/5- ..u.~... .- - ~~... - ., . Lab I?.uplicate
,. ""....~.,':',...,.,.' '''';',,,,,,, ",.",'" .. ......~,x~.. ", ~ ",...,'X:X.»: ,...,)~".,.......c~ ',...."';'. »-"--a,"......"''''- '"
N '300 E "00 -"/7- 6 0 ... ... ..
,". ,. .'.,.,::'::.":.','.. "::-~:-"'.:"::-X'''' .,..~~.,.,.'..',," ~,~k,~~~""':"~.,"'Y"'--:",,*::'-~~'" '"
N '300 E 1200 -11/7- 6 0.000209
N '300 E '200 -11/7-'8 0
'N 1300 E '300 '~;':n-" ::"'-'6'::::-" "~"'~~"(:,"::o' "." """,:...""..~-~.,.,.,: :.u..~._u--~.:.,.,:..." ..
...,
Comments
5
Lab Duplicate
:...;:~.,-";;,;;,,....,..,...._..._....*-:;.,.~
-
-
Lab Cuplicate
Lab Duplicate
~)-:,;,;;;',',',',""'-','''...,!.;;.'
'"(.;:;;.,~~-
~"-;.,':~;:',
,
.~~
:...:;';;":'~:,~:..,":.', .."
..
...
..
...
,...,'. ,........
,...,
PLM - Polarized Ugnt Microscopy; TEM - Transmission Electron Microscopy
TEM Method deteCtion limit Is 0.5 !MI. PLM deteCtion Umit Is , % .
. ~~~ AL.UANCc
-------
TABLE 2 (continued)
Analytical RE:sults Survey-New Vernon Road. .
Analytical
TechniQue
TEM PLM
.. A!;tJ8SlCS .. A!;bfistc$
N 1300 E 1500 .-11/8- 6 0
-.. " ,,:,;""'~':;::',~;,':':~',:: .:"';u.:':'~;..:~".~ ~.::::ZJ.~Z:' .:..~w:::.""'r~ w..-.."""~' ......-... ':.;.,.~~~;;::;::'i<."''''-:';::~
N 1300 E 1550 -11/8- 6 0
.. .....;:::'f~'-~:.~: ....~~:.~.:..~,...'I;:; ~~ :~~.
N 1300 E 1600 -11/8- 6 0
... '0""""'" ';-:-.:.:;(::;:Y"'"""':~~ ::..~~«;,;,;r::..'. ";,.._: -'-~.'"
N 1327 .E 379 -1117- 6 0
N 1327 E 379 -1117- 24 0.001345
,,; ".. ...,,-.... ''''''...~oi:''~)o''«' ;,...~:.: ~:~~
N 1338 E 350 -1117-8 0
. """,,,,':'.:.. .::::'Ie'O'lo.~:..._.: .:::.:~:,,:.':.....:;"" ~.~.. ',. .~..-.. =.I\CI!J..'. ::.~-
N 1350 E 21.0 -11/9- 6. 0.00325 .
':~'~'.~..:'.~".:;' ..4~"'":W:~;:: ,,,~,:":::,::;~:,':".,: ~ :.~~~:""I,::",,"'J'"
N 1350 E 225 -11/8- 6 0.003841
.. .... ,,-,......,."::.:. = ,~.....I.... ..~. ..<.~.. ...~~ .,:.~-"".:s>=.=v=,.,...
N 1350 E 250 -11/8- 6 0
: ,. .. '..' ':""'.M.." ::"::WrMiIo.X'/""""'.M-> ;",,~:':~V:"'"'''"=r''' ~-""yi;,'J¥':«~~:"'"
N1350 E300 -11/7- 6 0
," .- ".,'," :~"':'.";.." :<"-.. ':'::~!..:::".(;":t,.:.:..:::-.:'.~~ ':."oc~~.:~"'.':'.~:m~::: :::'::,",",:.,.;,r~:~:~=!;:;::,,,,;:"::':".,
N 1350 E 400 -1116- 6 0
," : :.~:. ,'''' .... :;'~~"$(-;r;.:;,:.:..,.~~,,;~ .:::$r.!:$:~:A:;:::v.::"...~:':;~ :";'"N:':: ":".""" "~"..,'''''':.,.. .:~
N 1350 E 466 -11/7- 6 0
N 1350 E 466 -,,/7- 24 0
..,.. . .,. ;"'::,;"..Y":::'::"i( .,...::;.~~::.~:::.¥...::...-~:~ "::'..';:::;"-,..;..,.,;".,.;.~..'.
N 1352 E 1300 -11/7- 6 0
,., .. .. ,~.: :.? ,'" ._'M. ':::"""':'.::'''''' ,....-",:....~. .-'. ,'. .. ...
N 1375 E 1100 -1117- 6 0
'"''.¥':''.''' :.:""".:~ .:''''...,.:''.:';.::.:':::.....:' ',. ......;...,-:'~'.""."':"
N 1375 E 1200 -11/7- 6 0
'."".... .. .."',:.'.. """::-:-' .'...;':::'-:.,:=;;: ":. :::..:.: '::::. ,..,:",.',.. ;.....;...',
N 1400 E 225 -11/8- 6 0.000471
N 1400 E 225 -1118- 24 0
,. ..,:.-..," ...'" ,. ..... ,.:-...:~:".:~,:., .:;.,:~)':.;.,'::.,:.),'-;- ..:~: :., :N':':,..
N 1400 E 250 -11/8- 6 0.001234
.. ...' : ...~'" <-x«oc:::..... .. "
N 1400 E 341. -1H7- 6 0.000741
N 1400 E 341 -"/7- 24 0
., ... ..,... ..... "'.~~ :;.:::,:..
N 1400 E 4'9 -11/7- 6 0
... ,."
.... ',"
N 1400 E 900 -11112- 6
u
N 1400 E 1000 -1117-6 0
N 1410 E 510 -11/7- 8 0.013299
..' ~,"(:::;,,;,~~,:"o)o"', :.:..::... ;~":>::...;j$..:(
N 1415 E 231 -11/8- 6 0.002298
N 1415 E 231 -11/8- 24 0.001940
'.... .". ,. .~''!"'''.:... x, :. ;;::;;:. :~:!:.::.'::..''''''' - .:!"':..~~:...~.;;.:~;'..",.,
N 14'9 E 300 -11n- .~;"'~::'.. ,. ...~..".,.,.~~:~ .:~~~~..,.:..:,9........... .:"""...~:-;;,~.:N...
N 1420 EI.SO -11/6- 6 0.000414
. ' ...--....' . : " :..:,:t.; -,'" :;......... ~.,c.c::",,'" . .......;.'~::: ,.. ,,-,-"'~:~:..;'~-'"
N 1425 E 250 -11/8- 6 < 1
.' "'''''''.~Y= ..'i&."'»"!~:.:: ... .." . ' '. .,:::.', .:..,:(~ .:-'
N 1425 E 400 -11/6- 6 0.003126
Grid Paint
Sampling Ce~
Cate (1nc/Jas)
Comments
I
I
--,~~~~,~,
~ ~..:.:--~
~ T.~"""r:!':';:'::':;:.
..
:<:.:"...w=
",~..;' _.
.,~,....~~:::-:,..
~..,..;';~~:.:".;~":: ,
" "',....:::...
u
.. '..
o
.:..,.:.~,.",
..' .
..
,..,,,.,...;:..,Jl-.,.....;..'
.".
..
...
...
PLM - PQlarized Light MicroscoPY; TEM - rransmission Electron MicroSCOPY
TEM Metnad detection nmit is 0.5 ~. PLM detection Umit is 1 ~ .
-------
. -
TABLE 2 (co"tinued)
Analytical Results Survey-New Vernen Read
Analytical
Grid Point Sampling Depth Tec."niQue Comments
Date (lfJChas) TEM P1..M
" A.s:OtIS'tClf "AsbflSfClf
N 1«0 E300 -11/6- 6 0.088587
"X"':"~-:'. '..:'.:x.;:~,,:":":'.:;':~~:":":"~ ~]$"".;;.,.~.;';:~~'f :,,~"-.~'S.1,;"" :.i"c "'ff~~W:;'~.~ ,. '.~!.,...~,.,...........t......-~
N 1445 E695 -"/7- '& 0 Lab Duplicate
N 1445 E&95 -11/7- 6 0 Lab Duplicate
. "". ..".~.:'''.j.~.:'':';:'~:.:..''~'''' ::~*""~:>x.,,,~::::>x. .Y.~:;;;:::::'~ .~,~-;r~ :~........']:! <:' ....:~...)~".:....Io."--"""~;; -';;'"#;~-4_....-
N 1450 E2S0 -11/6- .~~ . <1
;Y;',:.'..:.: .V\....:",..":':',":" :;:~ ".,:,::~;.,= -=...e::' . "«=.-....!."- =~ ~:.~ ._.~...~........\"..t:fi!..~';;'
N 1450 E&OO -1''7- '& . 0 Lab Duplicate
N 1450 E600 -1117- 6 0 Lab Duplicate
.
UNKNOWN - 1 -11/7- 6 20
UNKNOWN - 2 -11/9- 6 50 Lab Duplicate
UNKNOWN - 2 -11/9- 6 40 Lab Duplicate
UNKNOWN - 3 - -11/12- 6 0
I TEM I PI.M I .,", .w. .
Total Number of Analyses 189 i 41 ::;~':'~:;:~.:\~;;~~:~:~:~':..;::." .:" ;"~'::;;':~":
PI.M - PolariZed Light Microscopy; TEM - Transmission EJecrron Microscopy
TEM Method detection limit is 0.5 %. PUe4 detection Umit is 1 % '
"
-------
TABLE 3
SUMMARY OF PRlORITY POLLtrrANT DATA
TEST BORING SAMPLES
vmrrE BRIDGE ROAD SITE
Sample NUmber
WBRI WBR2 WBR3 Trip Blank
4 S.. 10 18 9/24/86
.
Volatile Organics (uw'k&)
Methylene C1loride 54B 59B 31B 29B 6B
Trichlorofluorometbane 31 31 '.
Chloroform 2JB 2JB lOIB 7IB 2JB
Benzene SIB 9JB
Toluene 2JB 2JB SIB 7JB
Base Neutrals (uWkg)
Naphthalene 31
Dietbyl phthalate 13JB 12JB 69JB
. Di-n-butyl phthalate 165 2.700
Bis-2-ethylhexyl p,htbalaIC 31J
Phenols (mglkg) 0.54 1.02
Metals (mglkg)
Antimony 32N 19N 84N 70N
Arsenic 6.4SN [l.8]N [S.O]N
Beryllium [1.0]N
Cadmium 2.3N
Chromium 18N 1SN 111N 7.1N
Copper 328N 228N 43.SN 16-N
Le3d 8.9*N 7.2*N S4*SN 3.2*N
Mercury 1.16* 4.2* '
Nickel 32N 22N 27lN 162N
Zinc S7*N 43*N llS*N 107N
/J4. ALU4J\ICE
-------
. ..- .-
. -. ... -. -. -
-'-".------'- -- .. .
.. . -_... -- -- ..- .... ----------.. .
TABLE 4
ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY. WHITE BRIDGE ROAD .
Analytjcal
Grid Point Sampling Cf.pth TechniQue Comments
Cats (llJ;nu) TEAl PLM
"AtiDeSlC/$ ,,~OS
N 600 E500 -10131- e 0
:~~~.,.......~.~.(#,.e.;..
N600 E5S0 -10131- 6 0
.~ .=. - ..
N 600 E600 -11'1- 6 0.002181
N 600 E 600 -11'1- 18 0
~~~~~.!#o ¥.
N 650 E'SO -10/31- 6 0
>_UICUfFl . ""
N 650 E500 -10131- . 6 0 Lab duplicate
N 650 E500 '-10131- 8. 0.000270 Lab dupOcatB
N 650 E 500 -10131- 18 0
~~t.'.":::"""''lI»~'.'?.-~.~;'''$ ;;:::'";ii».~.- -
N 650 ESSO -10131- 6 0
"/.:':;'I«.-::~;:.~tA~~~. =,..~ .. -- "....:-.;s.;
N 650 E600 -1111- 6 It. 1.060388 <1.0
N 650 E 600 -11'1- 6 B < 1.0 Lab duplicate
N 650 E 600 -11'1- e B < 1.0 ~¥.~~p!~c::!~~ m
~~1,::.~:'~.~w.'~:,~~y~W'" ~~. .. ._-
N 650 E 650 -1111- 6 ,0
.::««.:o:..,:....'.:::M;(:'::-::~' ...-:-"~. .. U _......~.
N700 E450 -10131- 6 0
'.::.~;:~;:':':'~z::::,~~:-:.:::'~:~~m": ~,;z.~~ ':;""""........,.,.....,........:v. :...,~_.~ .-.vw.....-.v 1 _.... . ...
N 700 ESSO -1112- 6 10.0
'.:':;;{;1':.''JI'.;::,'':'::~~'.::~;-:.o,;:::1t.. ,"""",-",.,,;;' . '. --.... . .~..~I -~ .. ,. .v-'..".
N 700 E 650 -11'1- 6. 0
..~.:;;":.,;z::.'~:.":~:;":~:~~~:::::'~~::,, !$.~~ ._-~,.- "'._' ..'.... .... : .__0"' ,. .........'.
N7S0 E400 -10/31- 6 0.015706
N7S0 E400 -10131- 18 0.003578 Lab duplicate
N 750 E 400 -10/31- 18 0.016831 Lab duplicate
.::':-:-:-"""".:X'''''':~'''';':':-:':~~ :-...~~.~~ .:~~. .... ~:~t:.I;~cu:ucm::.UOot ==~C..IJ'.P.
N 750 E 500 -10131- 6 0.001113
N750 E500 -10131- 18 0
.. ',:.::;':'..:;.:::.:~.::.::~.-:t',w..""".;;..~. ,~)(~~~;::.=z~ ~..............c.U..~' N-"...':'.~,........,"'."'~"~-"""" .,,~. .-.== ~..~~,~).......A",~~;;':;;:'"
N 750 E 600 -11'2- 6, 0.163962
N750 E600 -1112- 48 0 Lab duplicate
N750 E600 -11/2- 48 0 Lab duplicate
";.~;~.:;,~~:...,,,:".::'...;:;;;;. -=.. ... 'a.a._'o~"""'~""" ,.. .x:
N 750 E 750 -1111- 6 0
..~~",:::,;~ :,6(;' '.'."'Y'"
N800 E300 -10131- 6 0 Lab duplicate
N 800 E300 -10131- 8 0 LID duplicate
,""'-31 I It'V-~ <
N 800 E .00 -10131- 6 0.003776
.",...........:r=:~'. '" .--.. .'., ,,"". ..
N 800 E 500 -10131- 6 A 0.0 FieldlL,at) duplicate
N 800 ESOO -10131- 6 It. <1.0 Lab duplicate
N 800 E500 -10131- 6 B <1.0 Field duplicate
~: ':'~.:!:::::;';:w~~::. ...~..;;.:;; ,"'." :""'~~1::'~-"'~
N 850 E150 -10131- 6 0.001789
N 850 E150 -10131- 18 0.000673
,',::,;;::".:':.':~' ::.':~:":'~.x:::: -~.-.:w .........-'~ .~,- :~A.. ,-,
N 850 E300 -10131- 6 0
.. " .. . '-~"',.. "-".''','.''''':''';:'~'' - ..;.-..._~ .~_._...,-. "I'o""""~.~~,:--".'" ..."'''' ..
PLM - Polarized Ugh! MicroscoPY; TEM - Tlansmission EJeerlon MicrosCOpy
1'£M method deteCtion Omit is 0.5 !MI. p~ detection Umit'is 1 !MI.
IJ" Al.UANCE
-------
- -.... -. -"----'
- .
... --. - . ...'~.- '.'-
-.. .~---_.__.--'_. .
TABLE 4 (continued)
Analytical
Grid Point. Sampling Depth Technique CQmments
Date (1nchss) TTJA I PUrl
.. A.sbes/r:zs .. A.sbes/C$
N 850 £500 -10131- I 0.000299
N 850 E500 -10131- 18' 0
,::~,~:,:,::,::.~}~,:;:»::-;"~,:,, ,.
N 850 E 550 -11/2- 6 0.0
,~...,~~~.,-,::
N 850 E 600 -11/2- e 0.330782 < 1.0
.~",~:':,:':,:',:~: ':.v:~:~':':'"$W'::':.~~ ,:~.., ~ ,.,IY!7 ----. .8:'
N C50 E750 -11/1- e 0 LIt) Cupllcate
N J50 E750 -11/1- e 0.000408 LIt) Oupneate
N 850 E750 -11/1- 18 0
. ,',."," ." ,.,.,"-~'OY"'-"'" ..,.. .. .. ..~! ... '" ..
,.""'.....,""" ",.'........._v.','..'.'.'.'.....'
N 900 E 100 -10131- S 0.00'116
N 900 E 100 -10/31- 18 0
...',:;.:.:::;:..'....::::' :;,':';;;;;,x,.;.;;os>:=. .--=S,', .~~ ~..---- "'.-
N 900 E 150 -10131- 6 20.0
::::..:-=::«...":(",:::~::.:,:«.:.:::;...: '-:«<.~ (_.. .. 1,.JotI
N 900 E 300 -10131- 6 A 0.000612 Field duplicate
N 900 E 300 -10131- 6 S 0.003081 Field duplicate
N 900 E 300 -10131- 18 A 0
, ..:::: ". ,::';'';;:'~,:=:;''.~'';',:.:..:':~ ...Y...':.~,:;;.~ ~-:";.t=..,"" .., ."'.,., ...", ~;;: , II iJ!IIIrI ~...".."'"
N 900 E ..00 -10131- 6 0.000572
N 9QO E400 -10131- 18 0
",' :... ," :., . :.:":;"~:':'".;(':"" ':;"".....,:;Z;== ~.~~:*:'i!~ '. : .. ~~~~:\..=..;
N 900 E500 -10131- 6, 0
".,j.;::?';;;"~,:'.::,:.::' .:;>:;;...-:"""...= ..- ~:~....... ~~:: ... ,. ',=-- --;.::-~
N 900 E sSO -10131- 6 0.0
..""(:."'~!' ...',,' ,.««-:"" :::::: :" '~~' - .- ,--. ,.- t.rI'Q-~"
N 900 E 650 -11/2- 6 15.0
,:' ;:-:::"': ,~',:.:;' ': .,;""..~'~;':.-:::-':';'~ :;'--~01."~';;;(''';'..,N. ....'._"''''~W'''' ;..~-r.;:-.-=-= ,,~~_..-:=.-:::.~;~.."'!.'?':.'''':''':'.:.
N 950 E 100 -10131- 6 0.001961
N 950 E 100 -10131- 18 0.001 087
." ':':O'::".,y#,:,' ',:::;. :::.:..:;':r:'...:!~'%#:IS' ..~.,~-:::::-. ',',,,,,,,.." .. ~ -:.~ if.._.:r-.-- .~~....:~':::.;..~,
, , ,'.,......
N 950 E200 '-10131- 6 ~-
'. ,',B,. ,. :....:~:~g~-:;:;~::),;;;; ::~.,<:r" " .~ ~~ ..~....~~..........,....".....;.:,:""",.:::.;.:'
N 950 E500 -10131- 6 0
.. ...... .. .."'~:"~:~: '."--' ~~- ~... II":, II
N 950 E 800 -11/1- e A 0 Field Cuplicate
N 950 E800 -1'/1- e S 0 Field Ouplicate
..:-:...,.::.~.:-~ "'''.''':''''~;;::'~'-= .=,~ .. ~ ......_,.,,~ :~'=-"'=-~
N1000 E 150 -10.'31- e !.o
:::.:,..., ;'''''~::.'''~:Y'=:'.': . N::~.d::$;"::i:::;'~ w. ... .., ..', .. ~.
N1000 E200 -10131- 6 0.003483
N1000 E200 -1Q131- 18 0
..':"IIt>;'...:.' ..,';:~":f.:r~:.'~::',,.. ~.~:'*'~~~ ,"I'0,,'..w«,:,,~,:,f>!.~ ,., . ""-" ,',-: .... ..
N1000 E2S0 -10131- 6 0.000646
.,.,;;.' ..::::::....':.::::.:, '~::~m:. ,~: ....-.
N 1000 E350 -10131- S 0.000193 LIt) duplicate
N 1000 E350 -10131- 6 0.003162 La.b duplicate
N1 000 E 350 -10131- 18 0
... ;.... ..,~~ .~.,' , '!;..:...~;;;~:t-:~i.~;'" "5'.! Q, a..- - ~- -;~~.~
N1000 E400 -'0/31- 6 0
..' ,:::..::;":<"..;..:: '~:;:.::~~, ,'. .. .- -'
N, 000 E500 -10131- 6 0.000285
.,.., , "':o...:.~:..."":,,,. ,,'" ~~::"'....:."',.i~: ~...,..,..,...;... .; Il'rf1{~. .." .... .;'-,..~ m h .=-~'
N1 000 E 550 -10131- 6 5.0
PLM - Polarizer:! Light MicfOSCCPY; TEM - Transmission EleCtron Microsccpy
TEM method deteCtion limit Is 0.5 %. PLM detection Umit is 1 %. ' .
c~ AllI~C:~
IJ.,.. ---'--
-------
. TABLE 4 (continued)
AnaJytic:a!
Grid Point Sampling Depth Ted'lnlaue Comments
Cate (inches) TEM I put
.. AsDdas .. Asb8ft$
'....;~~'f:.:~.:~'~~-'.., :.~:t;::~~ q. , .. .......... -''''''~'' "","""'.....""',"'"
N10SO E~50 -10/30- 6 0
~':w._~',=1~';: ~;:/,"'.:;c:... .. """,...',
N1050 E 500 -10/30- 6 0.0
"=:".~.,.);$.;;':'.:':~~ ..
N1 1 00 £ 100 -10/31- 6 0.00020.4 Lab duplicate
N1 1 00 E 100 -10131- 6 0 Lab duplicate
.::::.~,,:!,.,.,:":.:::-::;.~;..'~ ~~~"~:"Io..., ¥d""""""'"'''''''' ..,.-......-- -
N1100 E 150 -10131- 6 (').034650
N1 1 00 E 150 -10131- '8 0.000493
N1 1 00 E200 -10131- 6 0.000405
N1100 E 200 -10131- 18 0
u.:::::,:"!",:-:-."",,,:,=:;.;:-::':-:~~:I«o: ~"':('~'M'~' :..ooc1l- ,.--~
N1 1 00 E 300 -'0130- 6 0.001695 Field Duplicate
N1'00 E 300 -10'31- 6 0.006048 Field Duplicate
N1 100 E300 - 10130- 18 0 Field Duplicate
N1 1 00 E300 -1013'- 18 0 Field Duplicate
,,:;;:':::-'..~"-""::."iV,:;::: ...:;:'~:;~~ ~..=:;::-u................ ~..'-':.:5N.~..'M!«r"';" -... ~.-._.,_. ~.....::-----_..,-_..,..-=~
N1 1 00 E 350 -1C13o- 6 0.027969
N1 1 00 £3S0 -10130- 18 0.000283
.' ":'::'::; .; .Y:..':"~:. .".:'7.'Z.'~::=:= :~~:;;;.,.~. ~:::-,""'f!;;;:"~.. r""~ :_..;;.~,;;~'!(ec:::~X~_:;'~::;:
N1'00 E400 -10130- e 0.002123
N,,00 E 400 -10130- 18 0
.::':~;.:':' """:.::.:.. ," ';.:;~).,:;;.~~~.......~ w-~-::::::...~ ".....-.,..,_....'.'......."... .~~~~..~:'$.::':$:::r.-.:.If;.~:
N' 100 E~50 -10130- . 6 0.000387
N1100 E 450 -1.0130- 18 0
....,... '."«'" "''''......:.' ."""'~::-::':v..;<~ """"'" ... h .,.;c~»~~~:.>:-:;«~.....:
N' 100 E 500 -10130- 6 0
;'''''':.::'':'''.. ..:~",:vi~ ,.....,~~.....~""-;;. .- . .. ~:~~'.'-."':'~;';~~
. ..'
N" 00 E 550 - 10130- 6 0.$46812
N1 '00 E 550 -10130- .:--.-.. 18 0.434025
,',"" '..::',.';' ".:..:~::... ..v.:~<:.,=;;.~ ~'tt»:'""V""",,,,''- ~"J~""""'="" .~...,...,:.~..,=:.-::::::.-::
N1'00 E600 -1"1- .8 5.0
"",.,,'" .::'!Y";:: .".~:':¥. .,..7;;;;;;:Jr..~ ~_. .~iMrt ... '. ,!:~~~~<:c..:~~-
N"OO £ 650 -1'/2- 8 0.0
N"OO £650 -11/2- 24 20.0
:,~::.~:~..:~~:~"';::'
N1'00 £700 -1 "1- 6 5.0
"'If!'.',!;::...,:.~.:,"",,!,:.:.~~,< '.~'.....'''' ~~
N,100 £750 -"/2- 8 0.043027
N"oo £750 -'1/2- 24 0.017218 La duplicate
N1 1 00 £750 -1'/2- 24 0.OC55oW Lab duplicate
N'100 E750 -,'/2- 16 0.043027
.::.~y ....::~.,,,:...~:#.;:~.o::. : , ......,' .. ~_.~,;.;;w-~~~
N,'OO £800 -1'/2- 6 0
'~:":..''':H'~.:~.: .... ,'.,". :.:1"" .... .11' ~.,. .~--ms:;:~=:----="
N'1S0 £350 -10129- 8 0.0003'5
....''':''', ,',-':""'v.:::'''V. .- l-.. --
N1 150 E~OO -'0/29- 6 0
PLM - Polarized Ught MicroSt:fJPY; TEM - Transmission Elecrron MicroscoPY
TEM method detection limit is 0.5 tMI. P!..M detection Um1t is 1 'MI. .
-------
N1150 E ~OO -10129- 18 0
N11S0 E~O '-10129- 18 0
'='''><:':N'~~'.. .,
N11S0 E '50 -10129-. 0
N11S0 E 4$0 -10129- 18 0
:':~":?,.z.;.~w.::::....~':~'m';~y., ;u.~'
N11S0 E 500 -10129- e. 0.000868
::.r$.;".~~~':fS;.~~~'.r :~.sr;.":: "'0 ...0
N115J E 5S0 -10130- S. 0.011&84
.....~.x::,.,.....-AI'''- ..., .111 U:- .'. ;
N11S0 E 800 -11/1- I 0
Ni;2'OO';'::-e",oo ~'Qj31- & .,.... 0"
N1:Z00 E 100 -10131- 18 0
. .:,":".";:,,: . ."'f:':':.:~'::~~:.:;,::~.: .:: ...<::i':::::..<~.'" ..
N1200 E 1S0 -10131- 6 A 0
N1:Z00 E 3S0 -10129- 6 A 0
N':ZOO E 350 -10129- 6 A 0
N,200 E 350 -10129- 18 A 0
N,200 E 350 -10129- 18 B 0.000371
~:~,~:~,~::,,"!,;.!.:~ ."<:~,~J~ 3& B .... 0
N1:Z00 E 400 -10129- 6 A 0.00'021
N" 200":':;~';E:"50 '':10129~ '=6.:=, ':':»." ~'o
N1:Z00 E 450 -10129- 18 0.000306
N,200 E 4S0 -10129- 36 0 Lab dU\=lllcate
N,200 E 450 -10129- 36 0 Lab du~lIcate
.. '.:':..''''~::'::;:::':' '''':,::.,,:::,::::;;;.:;_u- ,', ..=:s:t(' :==."- :~*--..:""'~. .~~'~J:..~:.:;.:.~~':..::.=.-:::
N1200 E 500 ';'10129- & A 0 Field duplicate
N1200 E 500 -1012\;1- 18 A . 0 Field dU\=IlIcate
N1200 E 500 -10129- 6 B 0 Field dU\=Ilicate
~}~f,OO::;:..:.~;::~:~ ".:~,~~~ ~J,...!, 0 .= .l\. .. ,~~~~'iPE~:~~=~:,
N1200 E S50 -10130- 6 A 0
N1200 E 550 -10130- 18 ,A 0
N1200 E 550 -10130- 18 B O'
'...::<.:::::«:::o:~~:~"""""
N,200 E 650 -'1/2- 24
N1200 E 650 -11/2- 24
- -
Grid Point
TABLE 4 (continued)
AnaJyI1caJ
TechniQue
TEM P1.M
.. As/::J8ft':6 .. .AS>esrcs
Sampling Ce~
Cate (tnches)
':. :.~;'::.Y., ".~:~!,-;;,'.:;'~;.O#......,,: . :.~t..~.---,..,.. ., o.
N,200. E 700 -11/1- S
:::;.;......,: ::~..; .<'. ,,.,.,.,,,... .'1.,:::,,::.0.-::= '.C_-
N1200 E 750 -11/1- .
N1200 E 750 -11/1- 18
. ":;C:;:::::.... ",:;;.:~':..:;'t$.'.:.;;:;. "'~:;w.'':;'~:- .
N1217 E 517 -10130- 6
.".:.~.:.....,..,.....:.-..»;.;...:::;.~..........,;..~~tCoCt:-1
N12S0 E 250 -10130- &
',,",""",''''''...' '''''''''(';'':--~~.
N12S0 E 300 ,::,0130..:" 6
5.0
~.O
" .-,..
15.0
:...... ,.
0.000374
o
.=--,~.
0.0377",0
<1.0
0.0
-~... . ~"";';:_.~~"~"'''''''.._'''''-''
oMM:1U
-
"""... -...-
0.006313
Comments
Lab duplicate
~ du,pllcate
.,
..-
.. -...
~
--~..
Lab duplicate
Lab duplicate
Field dU\=Ilicate
, :..'P'U8 .
. . ..,:~:.
:.=.-~--. ~.- - ...--.....::
-
_.
Lab duplicate
Lab duplicate
..x;::..~
~~...
-:;r -.-.-.-.o;r;:.
'.~..-._.
.-~
Pl.M - PQlarized Ught Micros!::t'PY: rEM - TrVJsmission EJecuon Microscopy
TEM method deteCtion fimit Is 0.5 'MI. p~ detection UmIt Is 1 'MI.
GJ.. ~E!
-------
-.--
- .
... "- - --- _._--------_._~._-----_._,--_.-_._- .-._--~-' - ~., -..
'.
TABLE 4 (continued)
Grid Point' Sampling Depth
Cate (lncflU)
Analytical
Ted'lnlQue
TEJrI PUrl
M AsbeSIM .. AsbeSIM
.......- ..,"'.,...,...~~..._, ",,"..""'-'- w
;;H'3S0".-E'''Soo'':1ii1- 8 0
'--;.~;v:'~.::::;':~:'~:!!"':':~~ ..~.'. "
N1~OO E 2.50 -10130- 8 0.001273
N1~OO E 2.50 -10130- 18 0
:._~.>mr.,-=;;~~ ..Y.".'" Y'"
N1~00 E 300 . -10130- I 0
N1~00 ,E'3oo -10130- 18 0
:':":-;oC4«*:~.~.~;......::<....-.;' :'......
N1400 E:!SO -10/30- (5 0.000376
N1~00 E 350 -10/30.;. 18 .. 0
......."",.,....""""""._- ",'.\''''Y'~~:
N,',,'i50"'w "E'~OO~:'10130-'" 6 A 0
N1400 E ~OO -10130- 6 B 0
N1400 E 400 -10130-. 18 A 0
N1400 E ~OO -10/30- .18 B 0
,."..~~.:';,:'':. '.:~~:.:;y.. ',.~~'.;~, :!:.~,}:~~~':~:-;;~'V.~;Z:O: :~.;::::(. ..::..:. ",.,......a8!.;;;;III.
N1400 E ~50 -10/30- 6 0
N1400 E ~50 -10130- 18 0
"'::::'::~'~:~' .:'--;~:;':' :';:!W'~::: ::;~~'~!:.'!'~1;:.~~ ~:.... .-::-
N14,OO E 500 -10130- 6 0
N1400 E 500 -10/30-'8 0
,:,:,.:,~,.;_. .'-».r.::""".y....-»";.':: "~M~:":';::~:-- .~:.
N1400 E 600 -10130- 6 0
N1400 E 600 -10130-' 6 0.000229
N1400 E 600 -10/30- 18 0
:..:....;::.,:: ,.' ":'~,...~';:~";;.:'" ,;.t::::~:;:;.:':~:;':"'~.' ~""'...-,.~ .-..-........,.....,.._~"..'
N1400 E 650 -10130- 6 0.479973
:/~:,,,.::,:;.:t:".:.,:;:';~I.:..,:: -~~~:::""~~'.~ '~~;.;'
N14S0 E 250 -10/30- 6 0.095782
""",'" ',.":',:.';:-:-':;:;::-:,;;0:.. .~~.~':~,.- ""'. ,",'._'.'"
N1450 E 450 -10/30- 6: 0
N14S0 E 450 -10130- 18 0
N1450 E ~50 -10130- 18 0
,,:,:,,:,,;::"":,"""'''~'' ....~:~:. :::-""'Yo-::M:
N1~50 E 500 -10/30- 6 0.000377
,.~~:~.':t..'~;...."~" :~:'.- ......~. ..~~~
N14S0 E 550 -10130- 6 0.000666
""":,,,'.", "';""",",:",,'.:" ".~~.:-=-- .~==.;' -- ..'W'.
N1~50 E 600 -10130- 6 0
N14S0 E 600 -10/30- & 0
N1~SO E 600 -10/30- 18 0
. '-:.;.;;s.;;;;..:)1'
-------
TABLE 5
SUMMARY OF PRIORITY POLLUTANT DATA
'NEW VERNON ROAD SITE
GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL SAMPLES
Samcl@ Numb@r
18 TB
Volatile Oraanic5 ~ug/l) !YRl -IDL ~ ilQ!1S/B7) (10/1 6/86)
Methylene chloride 68 368 138 138 , 12B
Trichlorofluoromethane 0.4J O.SJ
Chloroform 28 2J8 78 sa 4JB
Trichloroethene O.9J
1.1.2~2-Tetrachloroethane 2J lJB 3J
Ethyl Benzene O.9JB lJ O.9J
Bas~ Neutrals (ug/l)
Diethyl Phthalate O.4J
Di-n-octyl phthalate 15 5J 6J
11tlW (ugl1)
Chromium 35 31
Mercury 4.5
Zinc '1 638 . 554
'Ph~nol 5 (ugl1) 130
-- Indicates compound was analyzed for but not detected.
J Indicates that the compound was analyzed for and determined to be present in the sample.
The mass specturm of the compound meets the identificaton criteria of the ~ethod. The
concentrarion listed is an estimated value, which is less than the specified minimum
lower limit but is greater than zero. '
B Analyte was found in method blank as vell as in sample.
,BlanK space indicates that the sample was not anayzed for that parameter.
-------
-....- ..-
. TABLE 6
SUMMARY OF PRIORITY POLLUTANT DATA
WHITE BRIDGE ROAD SITE
GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL SAMPLES
SamDlf Number
TB
Vo1atife Oraanics Cug/l) HW. HW HW (10/15/36)
Methylene chloride 6B 6B 138
Chloroform 2JB ~JB 58
1.1.2.2-Tetrachloroethane 3J
Base Neutrals (ug/l)
Bis-2-ethylhexylphthalate 218
Oi-n-octyl phthalate .15 27 127
Metals ~ugl1)
Copper 23
Silver 17
Zinc 371 78 128
Phenol s (ugl1) 49 45 85
J
Indicates compound vas analyzed for but not detected. .
Indicates that the concentration listed is an estimated value. which
is less than the specified minimum lover limit but greater than zero.
S . Analyte vas found in the method blank. a.s well as in the sample.
Blank. space indicates that the sample vas not a.nalyzed for tha~
parameter.
-------
TABLE 7 .
GROUNDWATER ASBESTOS DATA
. Mon1tor1 na He"
Hi"; nato" 5i te
. 901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
Great Swamc Site
GSl
GS2
GS3
GS4
GS5
GS6
GS7
GS8
.GS9
GSI0
GSll
New Vernon Road Site
NVRl
NVR2
NVR3
White Bridae Road Site
HBRl
HBR2
HBR3
Fh1d Blank 1
Method Detection Limit
-
Content
Asbestos Fibers
()5 microns) Per liter
<100,000
<100,000
<100,000
<10lJ,OOO
<100,000
<100,000
.<100,000
<100,000
<100,000
130,000
120,000
<100,000
<100,000
<100,000
<100,000
<100,000
<100,000
390,000
'<100,000
<100,000
<100,000
<100,000
<100,000
<100,000
<100,000
<100,000
-------
TABLE 8
SUMMARY OF PRIORITY POU-UTANT DATA
NEW VERNON ROAD SITE
SURFACE WATER
TB.l TB.2 TB-3TB-4 TB-5 FB-2
SW.18 SW.19 (2811) (2527) (2808) . (2556) (2558) (2276)
Volatile Organics (ug/1)
Methylene chloride
Base Neutral Extractables (ug/1)'..
-'
. 4JB
4JB
6B
38B
Diethyl phthalate
Di.n-butyl phthalate
Butylbenzyl phthalate
Phenols (ug/l)
11 '-
31
17
23
11
32
Mebls (ug/l)
Cadmium
Chromium .
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Zinc
7 28
.11
21 247
18S 570S
0.3
98 .140 88
98 1530 .
B
S
. .
Indicates compound was analyzed for. but not detce:z:d.
Indicates that the c:onc:nuation 1isted is an estimated value which is less than the
specified minimum lower limit but is greater than =ro.
Analyte was found in the method blank as well as in the sample.
Indicates value detemrined by Method of Standa%d Addition.
Blank spaces ino;cate thaI the sample was not analyzed for those parameterS.
Trip B~ .
Field Blank
J
TB
FB
44. ALLIANCE
-------
TABLE 9
SUMMARY OF PRIORITY POll..UTANT DATA
NEW VERNON ROAD SITE
SEDIMENT SAMPLES'
FB.1 TB-2 TB-4 TB-5
SED.13 SED.14 '(2526) (2527) (2556) (2558)
Volatile Organics (uglk&)
Methylene Chloride 2JB 3JB 4JB 4JB 6B
. Chlorofonn 3JB SB
Toluene 2JB . 3JB
Base Neutrals (ug/kg) .
Naphthalene 5J 17J
Diethyl phthalate 64J 92J 2JB
Phenanthrene 450
Fluoroanthrcne 550
Pyrcne 79J 1100
Benzo(b )f1uoranthene 1000
Benzo(a)pyrcne 60J
Di-n-butyl phthalite 0.6JB
Phenols (mglkg) 1.0 20
PesticidesIPCBs (ug/kg)
Beta-BHC 19 --
Metals (mg/kg)
Chromium 18.4 2.6
Copper 17.6* 41.1*
Lead . 15.1R 67.4R
Mercmy 0.13
Nickel 12.9* 15.6*
Zinc 48.8 98.7 126
IndicateS c:ompolmd was malyzcd far but DOt dacaed.
J IndicateS Iha1 !be compoum1 was malyzcd far and de1emIinec1co be preSCI1 in the sample. 'Ibc mass spec:r.m1 of
!be compolmd meetS me idemif1C3!ion aiu:ria of !be metI1od.. ~ cm=:mnIicm listed is In ~"''''M valu.c..
which is less than = specified ",i..i"'"ftI lower limit bin is greau: Ibm zero.
B Anal)"e was folmd in me method blmk IS wen IS in me sample.
. IndicateS duplicate maI)'$is is DOt withiD c:mmol limitS.
R IndicateS spike sample ~ is DOt withiD ccmrol UmitS.
. FE Field Blank
TB Trip Blank
4~ ALUANCE
-------
TABLE 10
SUMMARY OF PRIORITY POU-UTANT DATA
SURFACE WATER
WHITE BRIDGE ROAD SI'IE
TB.1 TB.2 TB.3 TB-4 TB.! FB.Z
SW.16 SW.17 SW.ll (2811) (2517) (2S08) (2556) (2558) (2:76)
Volatile Ol'laDics (uafl)
Methylene chloride 4JB. 4JB 6B 38B
Base Neutral ExtraCtabies (uWl)
Dicthyl phlhalate -' 11 11
Di-n-bulyl phlhalate 2J 11
Butylbcnzyl phlha1aIc 51 11
Bis.2
-------
- -
TABLE 11
SUMMARY OF PRIORITY POll..UTANT DATA
SEDIMENT SAMPLES
WHITE BRIDGE ROAD SITE
FB-1 TB-2 TB-4 TB-5
SED.ll SED-1Z SED-IS (2526) (2527) (2556) (2558)
Volntile Organics (uglkg)
Methylene chloride 41B 39B 4JB 41B 6B
Trichlorofluoromcthane 3m
Chlorofonn lOB 2m llB
Toluene 6JB 2JB 6JB ....
Base Neutrals (uglkg)
Naphthalene 18J 24000
Acenaphthylenc 630
Acenaphthenc 6000
Diethyl ph~alate 140J :DB
Fluorene 100b0 -
Phenanthrene 53000 190J
Anthracene 9500 -
Di-n-butyl phthalate 0.61
Fluoranthene 52000 190J
Pyrene 62000 200J
Chrysene 24000 -
Benzo(a)anthra.cene 24000 -
Bcnzo(b )fluoranthene 31000 -
Benzo(k)fluoranthene - 3700 3701
Benzo(a)pyrene 18000 -
Benzo(g,h,i)perylcne 11000 -
- Idcno(l.2.3,c.d)pyrene . 8300
Phenols (mg/kg) 3.7 0.6 20
.~.. ALLIANCE
-------
- -
TABLE 11 (continued) .
FB-l TB.2 TB.4 TB.5
SED.l1 . SED. i2 SED-IS (2526) (2527) (2556) (2558)
Metals (mglkg)
Arsenic - ' ..-
Chromium 11.5 17.3 - 8.87
-Copper 14.9* - 43.5* -
Lead 34.4R 1480R 16.4R
Mercury
Nickel 9.62* 15.4*. -
Silver 2.96
Zinc 44.1 104 21.3 126'
J
lnc:tica\es compound was analyzcd for but not detected..
Inc:ticates that the compound was analyzed for and detennincd to be pre~nt in the
sample. The mass spectrUm of the compound meetS the identification criteria of the
method. The concentration listed is an eStimated value. which is less than the
specified minimum lower limit but is greater than :zero.
Analyte was found in method blank as well as in sample.
Indicates spike samples recovery is not within conC"Ol1imitS.
Inc:ticates duplicate analysis is not within conC"OniInits.
Blank space indicates tha.t the sample was not analyzed for that parameter.
Field Blank or. Rinse Blank
Trip Blank
B
R
*
FB
TB
~~ ALLIANCE
-------
TABLE 12
SUMMARY OF ASBESTOS DATA
NEW VERNON ROAD SITE
SURFACE WATER
CONCENTRATIONS (fibers/liter}
SW-18
(up gradient)
ND*
SW-19
(down gradient)
3,200,000
-------
SW-16
(up gradient)
SW-17
(down gradient)
SW-21
(downgradient)
TABLE 13 - SUMMARY OF ASBESTOS DATA
WHITE BRIDGE ROAD SITE
SURFACE WATER
CONCENTRATIONS (fibers/liter)
1,000,000
2,000,000
-------
TABLE 14 (continued)
Air Monitoring Results at the New Vernon Road Site
Nov. 8
Area
Sample, Sampling Volume
Loca1ion Period ColleCted Fiber L.aad Concentration \
(Titers) (per SQ. mm) (fibers/c:) I
AMS-,,/5-UP Upwind "35 - '633 524 2.546 0.002
AMB-' H5-CN Cownwind 1329 -1639 1S62 3.820 0.00'
AMB-,,/5-01 Ridt R. 1335 -1545 298 0.000 . <0.00'6
AMB-"/S-01 (Cu~.) ~ck R. 1335 -1~S 298 0.000 <0.00'6
AMB-11/5-FB1 Field Blank NA 0 0.000 (a)
AMB-1 H5-FB2 Field Blank NA 0 0.000 (a>
,,' , ,::' ..' -..,','.»,"'W;:.~:,'Y!!: ",:.."":".,,, ':;'.',':",*, ",',',:-:o-,,":!'.;;;s.= ~,;-,"';-. "==-~",,,~,,~-- ,"',:.,"', ..,',~,=,w,'..;:.-.;;;;o",
AMB-11/6-UP , U~ind Oa30 -1730 1080 0.000 <0.0005
AMB-11/S-CN Covmwind CJa30 -1730 1080 5.093 0.002
AMB-,1I6-01 -rom Lo 1400 -1700 360 3.820 0.004
AMB-1'/6-02 " . Rick R. 1400 -1700 360 . 14.006 0.015
AMB-"/6-o3 Fred M. '400 - 1700 3S0 11."59 0.012
AMB-1 H6-Fe' Field Blank NA 0 1.273 (a)
AMS-' 1/6-Fe2 Field Blank NA 0 0.000 (I)
AMS-"/6-FS2 (Cu~.) Field Blank NA 0 11."59 (I)
. . . -:":....: ... ....0: .", '~". ......".....- .....:: ....... .»;~<~' :::;:-"'*~:-""""~q, :~::...;. .' .', ",,,,,.,,,,,,,,~":- .. . ,"'''''::.'' ...:::::.....::
AMB-"n-Up Upwind 0800-1700 1080 1.273 0.000
AMB-1,n-CN Cownwind 0800 - 1700 1080 3.820 0.001
AMB-"n-01 Lindsey C. 1400 - 1700 3S0 33.104 0.035
AMS-"n-02 MartaC. '400-1700 3S0 10.18S 0.011
AMB-' 1n-02 (Cup.) Maria C. 1400 - 1700 3S0 7.639 0.008
AM8-' ,n-FS1 Field Blank NA 0 1.273 (a)
AMB-'1n-FS2 Field Siank, NA .. ..", ""~::,,,-, 1.2!3..", " (I)
AM B-1 1 IS-UP upwind'''' '" 0905 - 1719' '869M- " ' ;'.273"" 0.001
AMS-111S-CN Cownwind 0830 - 1725 803 1.273 0.001
AMB-11/8-01 Rick R. 0949 - 1225
1425 - 1720 520
09'49 - 1225
1425 - 1720 520
OSSO - 1205
1409 - 1715 480,
0901 - 1200
1410 - 1715 622
0901 -1200
1410 -1715
NA
NA
I
\
Cate
Type of
Sample
, Sample
I.C.
Nov. S
Area
Personal
....~...:... ;''''. ..""'...
Nov. 6 Area
Personal
Nov. 7
Area
Personal
..
Pers:nal
a5.723
tt063 '
AMS-11/8-01 (Cup.)
Rick Fl.
80.680
0.060
AM5-111S-02
Tom L..
13.867
0.0'1
1
, I
I
AMS-1118-o3
PhilM.
27.734
0.017
AM5-1 1/8-03 (Cu~.)
PhilM.
AMS-' "S-FB1
AMS-111B-Fe2
Field Siank
Field Blank
622
o
o
30.255
'0.000
,.213
0.Oi9
(a)
(a)
..,
"
(a) FielrJ blanks have no sample YOlume; re$Ult:; expresserJ as total fiber 10lc (fibers/sq. mm)
(0) Tri{)/icare analyses of tl1is sample ~nduCted for QC purposes. ,
-------
Q
TABLE 14 (continued)
Air Monitoring Results at the New Vernon Ro'ad.Slte
Type of ' Sample I Sample Sampling Volume
Date Sample LD. Location Period ColleCted Fiber Load Concentration
I (Tirers) (per StJ. mm) (fiberslc::)
Nov. 9 Area AMB-11'9-UP UpWInd 1000 - 1345 396 3.820 0.004
AMB-11'9-0N Downwind 1000 - 1355 325.5 1.273 0.002
Personal AMB-11'9-01 Phil M. 0955 - 1100 102 1.Z73 0.005 (b)
AMB-"'9-01 (Cup.) PhilM. 0955 - 1'00 102 2.546 0.010
AMB-1 ,/9-FB1 Field Blank NA 0 1.273 (a)
AMB-1 1'9-FB2 Field Blank NA, 0 0.000 . "'$,~,,,,...,.:,:,,.,.,,J~t::,w;:.::.-
,':'::,(;:";.;'''''''':, .: ..; "'.~::'''''':'' ;... ',' "...: .:' ~-:.::... ";":'x:~;:;"':'",~:,~",_:,:,:;;:~:~: ,,:,:":";,z,:.::::::.j.;'.":.:;";";':;;;';:: ,~...,,:.,"'.,,""='" ,,,=,,;:.:= ~~..x::-;,:''''::'':.:.:.:.~~
Nov.' Area AMB-11/12-UP . Upwind 0955 - 1643 726.2 3.820 0.002
AMB-11'12-DN Downwind 000 - "63 670 3.820 0.002
Personal AMB-'11'12-o1 " Rick Ft "1'2-1321
'420 -1626 436 17.649 0.016 (b)
AMB-11'12-01 (Cup.) RickR. '112-1321
1420 - 1626 436 1$.128 0.013
7.639 0.007
AMS-1 1'1 2-FB1 Field Blank NA 0 0.000 (a)
AMS-1 1'12-FB2 Field Blank NA 0 0.000 (a)
,. .. .. ...., ;':"'...:....~." ,'~''''~'. ....,~:~:::!: ..;.~.:~~-:.:..:.::... "'~'::. ...... . ,'., .:" .." :...;',.:"
Nov. 1 Area AMS-1 1'1 3-UP Upwind 1026 - 1637 649 3.820 0.002
AMB-1 1/13-DN Downwind 1031 - 1645 632 2.546 0.002
Personal AMS-11/13-01 RickR. 1043 - 1220 '66 $.093 O.01~
AM5-11'13-0' (Cup.) RickR. 1043 - 1220 166 0.009
AMS-' 1/'3~FB' Field Blank NA 0 0.000 (a)
AMS-",,3-Fa2 Field Blank NA 0 0.000 (a)
(a) Fielc oianks !'lave no sample volume; resull$ expres$e: as rotal fiber loaa (fiberslS~. mm)
(b), iriplicate analyses Qf this sample conduCted for QC purposes. '
-------
TABLE 15 .
AIR MONITORING RES~TS AT THE WHITE; BRIDGE ROAD SITE
Date of Type of I $amPe Sample I Sampling Volume ~onc:entration Detection
!collec-Jon Sample I.D. L.oc:a%Ion PeriOd " CO!leded ....., Umlts
(Iiaft) c&cNa:J
Oct. 29 Area AMB- 1 0I29-UP Upwind 1450 ~ 1640 1,040 0.0005 0.0005
AM B-1 0I29-00WN . Downwind 1458 -1&35 .870 ~.0005 0.0005
AMB-1Q129-DOWN (Cu;I. Downwind 1458 - 1635 870 0.001 0.0005
Persona! AMS-1C129-1 rt"om L. 1412 -1629 274 0.002 0.0018
AMS-1C129-2 Jun. L 1413 -1633 280 0.004 0.0018
AMS-10129-3 RonP. 1418 -1631 270 0.002 0.0018
AMS-10129-FS1 (Blank) Fteld SIan~ NA 0 (I. 0.000 0
AMS-10129-Fa2 (Blank) Fteld SIan~ NA 0 (I. 0.000 0
-~. ,~=---=.~ '~:~":;~~""" .. ... v ~:t::=r"~ ;";;"'.Z.("~~~:
Oct. 30 Area AMS-1013O-UP Upwind 0930 -1159 1,"90 0.001 0.0003
AMS-1013Q-UP (Cup.) Upwind 0930-1Hi9 1 ," 90 0.000 0.0003
AMS-10130-00WN" Downwind 0919 - 1204 1,850 <0.0003 0.0003
Personal AM S- 10130-01 Maria D. 1336 -1652 392 0.006 0:0013
AMS-10130-02 SobM. 1337 -1655 396 0.001 0.0012
AMB- 10130-03 Ride R. 1340 -1705 410 0.002 0.0012
AMB-10/3o-Fa1 Field Sian. NA 0 (I. 0.000 0
AMB- 1 0/3o-Fa2 Field Blan. NA 0 (.. 0.000 0
.'........y.-.YIY'-".,,,',U.....'.'" :::'-;;:"""':::';'~:':,:;:;';:;''''.» .:...~.:->:;:..:.:";:'::;:".;.;.,..:.;.'~»-~:~~"'!-~ .:;::::.,......,_.. .-"... ~..-....'.' ...~ ...~.., :"'W''''";(''''''''~''''':$"z~.;r.~'''''i:''''''''''''''' :.~';;;;.~'~~;)I$:;;:u;:'t!..
,,,,,,,,,,-,,,,,,,,"""10'4."
Oct. 31 Area AMS-10/31-UP Upwind 0850 -1715 1,010 0.000 0.0005
AMS-10/31-DN Downwind 0900 - 1700 86.0 ~.0005 0.0005
Personal AMB-10/31-o1 Juna I. 1410 -1720 380 0.010 0.0013
AMB-10/31-o1 (Cup.) JuliaL 1410 -1720 380 0.012 0.0013
AMS-10131-o2 Ron P. 1345 -1650 388 0.004 0.0013
AMB-10/31-a3 lTom L. 1342 -1701 398 0.005 O.oe
AMB-10/31-FS1 Field Slan~ NA o. (I. 0.000 \/.
AMB-10/31-Fa2 Field Slan~ NA 0 (I 0.000 0
",,"~?~~:";...:::.~;:. . . .',' ....~. ',' " .. . . ',', ,'" . ~~...:.:': '.~.""~ ....~:~.~.... .. - '0"..."... ..~....=.'''''''' lOt III .. .:.... 'f.-;s.~~$;"""':(.~';';:::::-"";:;:..~~ :::~.,'~~
.......', .. . ..,',"JI,", ..""'.A-
Nov. 1 Area AM B-1 111-UP Upwind 1'15 -1748 1,179 . 0.000 0.0004
AM B-1 1/1-oN Downwind 1010 -1720 1,290 0.000 0.0004
Personal AMS-11/1-o1 Sob M. 1515 -1729 268 0.005 0.0018
AMS-11'1-a2 Ron P. 1520 - 1720 240 0.004 0.002
AMS-11'1-a2 (Cup..) RonP. 1520 -1720 240 0.004 0.002
AMS-11'1-o3 Ride R. 1517 -1725 256 0.004 0.0019
AMS-11'1-FS1 Field Slan~ NA 0 (I. 1.273 (.) 0
:.:~~.~.~~ AMB-11/1-Fa2 Field BIan~ NA O ~. 0.000 0
,~::'i:";::.,:~~::. ~:.»:~:"'~""'" .. ....,.. .. '" "" _.-..~.".,... ':'.::~~~.o..'::
Nov. 2 Area AMB-11/2-UP Upwind 0820 -1200 675 0.001 0.0007
AMs-11I2-oN Downwind 0820 -1200 675 0.001 0.0007
Personal AM B-1 1/2-a1 Personal 0815 - 1200 450 0.004 0.0011
AMS-11'2-o2 Personal 0815 - 1200 ~O 0.010 0.0011
AMS-11'2-a2 (Cup.) PersonaJ 0815 -1200 450 0.011 0.0011
AM B-1 112-FS1 Field Blan~ NA 0 fa, O.ooq 0
" AMB-1112-Fa2 Field Slan~ NA 0 (. 0.000 0
(.) Fi.lt/ bl.nk. h.... 110 "IfIP~ 'IOIUIfI'; ,.8IIr. ,..f8t1., rr:uJ IbM -- (fl#ll8f.1IIIft}
S.mpliflg AI./hod: NIOSH 14M: Nt.t'fli"' UItllOtl: ~- c::otIcra. JtlicnICt1P1
~~ Al1.IANCE
i.;~~.. 100:- ;....... 0:-
.. .. ...--
-------
"
- -
TABLE 16
~SEESTOS CONCENTRATIONS ~SED IN RIS~ ~SSESSHE~.
Air
site
Sample
Location
Samplinq Vclume
Period Collected
(liters)
Concentration
(fib/cc)
New Vernon Road
**Personal" 1425-
"1720
520
0.063
""
White Bridqe Road **Personal
380
0.012
1410-
1720
* The concentrations used represent the" maximum detected
concentration reported in the~. The samplinq method used is
N!OSH 7400: the analytical method is phase contrast microscopy
(PCM). PCM detects only fibers lonqer than 5 um and >0.4 um in
diameter. The detection limit is 0.01 fibers/cc. Furthermore,
PCM is a nonspecific technique and will measure any fibrous
material.
**
-------
~ ~
TABLE 17
Toxicity Value. for As~esto.
1NHA~TION REFERENCE CONCENTRATION (RfC' FOR ~SBESTOS
Not available at this time. (rRZS 3/19/91: KEAST Annual FY91)
INHALATION CANCER SLOPE FACTOR (SF' FOR ASBESTOS
weiqht-of-Evidence C1a..ific.ti~n -~
A; human carcin0gen
Inhalation tJnit 'Risk -- 2.3 x 10.1 per (fibers/ml) (IRIS 3/19/91)
The unit risk is based on fiber counts made ~y phase contrast
microscopy (PCM) and should not be applied directly to
measurements made by other analytical techniques. For both the
New Vernon Road site and the White Bridqe Road site, the asbestos
calculations were based on the PCM method.
The unit risk was based on the assumption of a 20 mJjday
-------
. . -
"
. -
._" -. .:-- .....--..------.
..
TABLE 18
. -
~alculation otCancer Risk ~ssociat~d with pote~tial E~osures
to Asbestos in the Air
site
A4u1t ...i4.nt
New Vernon Road
1 x 10~
. .
White Bricqe Road
3 x 10"
------- |