United States Off ice of
Environmental Protection Emergency and
Agency Remedial Response
EPA/ROD/R10-93/059
June 1993
v>EPA Superfund
Record of Decision
-------
REPORTDOCUMENTA~ON 11. REPORT NO. 2. 3. Reclpl.nt'8 Acc88810n No.
PAGE EPA/ROD/R10-93/059
4. Tltl. and Subtitle 5. Raport Dat.
SUPERFUND RECORD OF DECISION 06/30/93
Allied Plating, OR 6.
First Remedial Action - Final
7. Author(a, 8. Performing Organization R.pt. No.
8. P.rformlng Organization Name and Addr- 10 Project Ta8lclWork Unit NO.
.
11. Contract(C) or Grant(G) No.
(C)
(G)
12. Spon80rlng Organization Nama and Add,..a 13. Type of Report & Period eov.r8d
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 800/800
401 M Street, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20460 14.
15. Supplementary Notee
PB94-964619
16. Abatract (Limit: 200 worda)
The 12-acre Allied Plating site is a former chrome plating facility in Portland,
Multnomah County, Oregon. The site can be divided into three areas, based on
historical uses. These include an administrative and storage building; the layout
area, which is occupied by a crane facility; and the low-lying impoundment area, which
occupies the northern area of the site. Land use in the area is predominantly
industrial, with a riparian (riverbank) area located to the north of the site. The
site lies 1,000 feet south of the Columbia Slough, a shallow, steep sided, slow moving
body of water that flows across the northern edge of Portland. A single unconfined
aquifer was identified beneath the site, whicQ supplies ground water to upgradient
facilities for irrigation and potato processing. Drinking water is supplied by the
city of Portland and does not originate in the vicinity of the site. Prior to 1947,
the site was vacant and most likely used as a pasture. In 1947, the site was leased
for use as a wrecking yard, and, in 1957, was leased to Allied Plating. Allied Plating
operated the site from 1957 until 1984, when onsite operations ceased. Prior to 1969,
wastewater from the facility was discharged to the swale leading into the slough. In
1969, when backfilling isolated the property, liquid wastes from the plating process
were discharged onsite directly to a pond within the impoundment area. The metals in
(See Attached Page)
17. Document Analyela a. D88crlptora
Record of Decision - Allied Plating, OR
First Remedial Action - Final
Contaminated Medium: None
Key Contaminants: None
b. Id.ntlfl.rafOpen-End8d T.rms
c. COSATI Field/Group
18. Availability Stat.ment 19. Security Clan (ThIs R.port) 21. No. of Pag..
None 122
20. Security Clasa (ThIs Pags) 22. Price
None
50272.101
(SM ANSI-Z39.18)
SH/natructJons on Reverse
OPTIONAL FORM 272 (4.77)
(Formerty NTIS.35)
-------
EPA/ROD/R10-93/059
Allied Plating, OR
First Remedial Action - Final
Abstract (Continued)
the plating wastewater precipitated out, forming a layer of plating waste at the bottom of
the pond. Once onsite discharge ceased, the pond receded, leaving a dry area covered with- ,.
plating waste. In 1978, as a result of the discharge of wastewater to the pond, the State
required the installation of an onsite wastewater treatment system and discharge and RCRA
permits. State studies in 1984 indicated that ground water in the vicinity of the site and.
soil in the impoundment area were contaminated with metals, including lead, nickel, and
chromium. In 1992, EPA conducted a removal action at the impoundment area that involved
excavating approximately 1,100 tons of soil and debris, with offsite stabilization and/or
disposal; dewatering 70,000 gallons of pond water from the pond area, and disposing of 120
tons of the resultant filter cake; backfilling the pond and other areas within the
impoundment area; and enacting a deed restrictions on the use of the shallow aquifer at
the site. During the.RI, it was determined that site contamination was mainly limited to
the layer of plating waste. Subsequently in 1992, EPA conducted a second removal action
to transport the plating waste offsite. This ROD addresses the impoundment area as a
final action. Since the potential risks to human health and the environment have been
reduced to acceptable levels by the earlier removal action, there are no primary
contaminants of concern affecting this site.
The selected remedial for this site is no further action. The previous 1992 removal
actions have reduced the health threats associated with site-related contaminants to
acceptable levels.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Not provided.
-------
Record of Decision
Decision Summary. and
Responsiveness Summary
for
No Further Action
Allied Plating Superfund Site
June 1993
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
1200 SIXTH AVENUE
... SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101
-- ,
-------
Declaration for th~ Record of Decision
Allied Platina. Portland. Oreaon
Statement of Basis and Purpose
This decision document presents the No Further Action Decision for the Allied
Plating site, in Portland, Oregon, which was chosen in accordance with the
requirements of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Uability Act of 1980 (CERCLA), as amended by the Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA) and, to the extent practicable, the National Oil and
Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP). The Oregon Department of
Environmental Quality concurs with the No Further Action decision. The information
supporting this remedial action decision is contained in the administrative record for'
. this site.
Description of the Selected Remedv
This Record of Decision is for No Further Action. The site has been remediated
by a Removal Action which took place in October and November of 1992. The
Removal Action addressed the threats posed by the site.
Declaration of Statutory Determinations
No Further Action is needed for protection of human health and the
environment. .
Because the No. Further Action decision will result in hazardous substances
remaining on site above health based levels, a review will be conducted within five'
years after the commencement of the Removal Action to ensure that the remedy
continues to provide adequate protection of human health and the environment.
. ~: .- .
EPA has determined that its response at this site is complete. Therefore, the
site now qualifies for inclusion on the Construction Completion Ust.
c ~ ~(~
¥Gerald A. Emison,
Acting Regional Administrator
f (
~1'
Dae
-------
.'
DECISION SUMMARY
ALLIED PLATING SUPERFUND SITE
PORTLAND, OREGON
TABLE OF CONTENTS
DECLARATION
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ii
- LIST OF FIGURES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. iii
LIST OF TABLES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. iv
LIST OF APPENDICES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. v
I.
INTRODUCTION.......... ... ...,. . . ..., .......
1
II.
SITE DESCRIPTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1
A. Location and Description, . . . . . . . . . . . ',' . . . . . .. 1
B. Topography........,..................... 4
C. Adjacent Land Uses. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . 4
D. Surface Water and Groundwater Resources. . . . . . . 4
E. Site Geology. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
F. Ecological Conditions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . 5
III.
SITE HISTORY AND ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES. . . . . . . . 6
IV.
COMMUNITY RELATIONS HISTORY .'-". . . . .'. . . . . . . . . . . 7
V.
SCOPE AND ROLE OF OPERABLE UNIT OR RESPONSE
ACTION WITHIN SITE STRATEGY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 8
VI.
SUMMARY OF SITE CHARACTERISTICS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
A. Purpose of the Remedial Investigation. . . . . . . . . . . 9
B. Results of Soil and Sediment Investigation. . . . . . . . 9
C. Results of Groundwater and Surface Water
Investigation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 14
VII.
" "
" -
" REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR ADDRESSING SITE.
-------
VIII.
IX.
X.
XI.
XII.
XIII.
XIV.
SUMMARY OF SITE RISKS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 19
A. Risk Assessment Rationale. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 19
B. Determination of Contaminants of Concern. . . . .. 20
C. Exposure Assessment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 20
D. Toxicity Assessment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., 24
E. Risk Characterization. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~.. 26
F. Risk Assessment Uncertainties. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 30
G. Human Health Risk Conclusions. . . . . . . . . . . . .. 31
-
ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 31
A. Ecological Profile. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 31
B. Data Evaluation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 32
C. Ecological Assessment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 32
REMOVAL ACTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 33
A. Determination to Perform a Removal Action. . . . ., 33
B. Action Levels. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 33
C. Removal Actin BoundarieS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 34
D. Removal Activities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 34
DETERMINATION THAT NO FURTHER ACTION IS
APPROPRIATE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., 37
CESSATION OF GROUNDWATER MONITORING. ....... 41
FIVE YEAR REVIEW. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 42
EXPLANATION OF SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES. . . . . . .. 42
APPENDICES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .45
'''':'',
-------
.
Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Figure 4. - -
Figure 5.
Figure 6.
Figure 7.
LIST OF FIGURES
Vicinity Map: Allied Plating. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Site Map. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Remedial Investigations Sampling
Locations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Impoundment Area Sampling Locations
. . . . . . . . . . .
Conceptual Model Human Health
Exposure Pathways. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Removal Action Excavation Locations
. . . . . . . . . . . .
Removal Action Screening and
Confirmational Sampling Locations
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
..~. .. .
2
3
10
11
23
35
39
-------
..
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1.
Range of Inorganic Analytical Results ,
Impoundment Area Soils. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Table 2.
Inorganic Analytical Results
Monitoring Wells IB06 and IB08 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Table 3.
Inorganic Analytical Results Monitoring
Wells MW08A, MW13A, and IB10 ..................
Table 4.
Inorganic Analytical Results
Impoundment Area Surface Water. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Table 5.
Summary of Pathway-Specific Exposure
Assumptions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Table 6.
Exposure Point Concentrations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Table 7.
Carcinogenic Risk and Non Carcinogenic
Risk Indices for Risk Assessment
Scenarios. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Table 8.
Risk Results for Inorganic Contaminants
of Potential Concern in Hot Spot. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Table 9.
Removal Action Confirmational
Sampling Results. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
',..; h.
Table 10.
Residual Risk for the Post Removal
Impoundment Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
~.- ...
..
13
15
17
18
22
25
27
29
38
-------
Appendix A:
Appendix B:
Appendix C:
Appendix D:
APPENDICES
Responsiveness Summary
Post Removal Risk Assessment
State Letter of Concurrence With the No Further Action
Decision
Administrative Record Index
._~
-------
DECISION: SUMMARY
Site Name:
Allied Plating
..
Site Location: Portland, Oregon
I. INTRODUCTION
The Allied Plating site was placed on the National Priorities list in February
1990, under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and liability
Act of 1980, 42 U.S.C. ~9601 et seq., as amended by the Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorizatipn Act of 1986 (CERCLA or Superfund).
In accordance with the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution
Contingency Plan (NCP), the EPA performed a Remedial Investigation (RI) for the
Allied Plating site. The RI, completed in April 1992, characterized contamination in
soils and groundwater. The Baseline Risk Assessment, part of the RI, evaluated
potential effects of the contamination on human health and the environment. Based
on the information in the RI, EPA determined that the appropriate course of action was
to conduct a Removal Action at the site. The Removal Action took place from October
20 to November 20, 1992, and successfully remediated the site.
This ROD presents the No Further Action decision for the Allied Plating site, in
Portland, Oregon, chosen in accordance with CERCLA, as amended by SARA, and to
the extent practicable, the National Contingency Plan. The decision at the site is
based on the administrative record.
II. SITE DESCRIPTION
A. Location and Description
The Allied Plating site is located at 8135 Martin Luther King, Jr. (MU<) Boulevard
in an industrial and commercial district of northeastern Portland, Multnomah County,
Oregon. It is approximately 1,000 feet north of the intersection of MLK Boulevard and
N.E. Columbia Boulevard, and 1,000 feet south of the Columbia Slough (Slough), a
local drainage channel that merges with the Willamette River and then the Columbia
River. Figure 1 is a map of the north Portland area, showing the location of the site in
relation to local features. Figure 2 shows the boundary of the site, the site layout, and
the surrounding area.
The. site covers approximately 12 acres, and can be divided intothre~areas
based on their historical usage. The southernmost section contains the fOrTner . ...
-------
~
~
..
. ."'
~
v
~f:::::.\".
...
..
\i!!!Ii;~}t.
.tr;\!i!/}.
../t~~~~~{1[Ji:i!!t:r::.;:.;"
Washington
'.:.-
..:/f\f:/
.;(~~~!!;r:!(:'"
''';:
ALLIED
PLATING
SITE
~~ :
.Iz
2
. KLOMETERS
Figure 1
Site Vicinity
Allied Plating
Portland, Oregon
"..:.. .
.- ~
f"
".' :"'.'
-------
'I
'.
,.
.. ..,""
I:.. ~ ~
Edgool fill :!' ~ ~ 4"-
\ :; ~ ~~' ~'
"'--;i~~ ~ ~ '~~ ..s...
:~ ~~~,~ ..s.~-
:i ~ ~ ~ "" ~ ..s...s. ~ --
.. ~.I. I'~..s. ~.
.'" I,.. tWIt';... ",...JI. .'..1.. ....
. .
. .
. . !
. . \
. I
. I
. I
. I
. :
. I
. "'--~s...~ .'
: ~III --..... . .
I 't'
,
.
.
.
.
.
.
....... W...
11WU~'lDc.IbCWI.
e
F ILL
.,
z
"'
f.
II:!
t1
I
1
I
t
9"'901
POUIOO\C)Wtlll
&---1
Layout Area
Figure 2
Site Map
--- ams- (IooIDw"""
-..-..- ""''''''(\Itlooochclln)
o .......
.-- ~Uw
........... tIgh Wal8lkw
,,-. Tapo C'.onIIIIn (1181'" MSij
........ ......,
.Fn8 Uw
~
NORTH
Sc8I kI FMI 1011
0""'1011
-------
administrative and storage building for the former Allied Plating business. This area is
across the street from the location where plating activities occurred, and was not
considered to be contaminated from operations. The "layout area" contains the former
plating operations building and storage yard. This area is presently occupied by the
Associated Truck and Crane Company as a repair and storage facility for cranes and
various heavy equipment. The "impoundment area" is the northern, low lying area of
the property. Prior to the Removal Action, it contained a pond formed from. the
discharge of wastewater from the plating business. This area is not used in current
site operations.
B. Topoaraphy
The elevation of the site varies from approximately 12 to 40 feet above mean
sea level, slOQing downward to the north. Prior to 1969, the property drained overland
to the nort':', into a swale that led directly into the Slough. Wastewater from the plating
facility was discharged to this natural drainage. In 1969, extensive backfilling with dirt
and construction debris north of the site partially covered the swale, cut off the natural
drainage, and left the northern end of the site 20 to 30 feet lower than the surrounding
off-site areas. Wastewater discharged from the facility began to collect in this low lying
area (the impoundment area) forming a 1.5 acre pond. Surface runoff from the Allied
Plating site and surface water draining from the adjacent area contributed to the pond.
The pond was drained and filled during the Removal Action. The impoundment area
still collects drainage for the area, and so water accumulates at the lowest point.
A combined sewer overflow (CSQ) pipeline runs northerly under the
impoundment area to an outfall in the Slough. The CSO line is a 36 inch square pipe
constructed in 1928. During the 1992 Removal Action, a remote control video camera
was used to inspect the pipeline. The pipeline was. still in good condition, and not
acting as a conduit for drainage from the pond. . .
C. Adiacent Land Uses
The site is located in an area of light industry;- Two food 'processing plants,
. many small industrial and or manufacturing businesses, a hotel and a 15 unit
apartment are located within 1000 feet of the site. To the northeast, on the other side
of the Slough, is a mobile home park with 180 mobile homes.
D. Surface Water and Groundwater Resources
Prior to the Removal Action, the site contained a pond that was formed when
backfilling isolated the site from natural drainage. At the time of the RI, the pond was
approximately 260 feet long, 105 feet wide, and 3 feet deep. It contained an estimated
376,655 g~lI~ns of water. The pond r~ived water from precipitation and .~noff,. ~~d
-------
recharge from groundwater. The pond was filled during the Removal Action. Surface
water still collects in the impoundment area.
The Columbia Slough is located approximately 1000 feet from the site. The
Slough is a shallow, steep sided, slow moving body of water that flows across the
northern edge of the city of Portland and along the south bank of the Columbia River.
From the site, the Slough flows west about six miles to the Willamette River. From this
confluence, the Willamette flows approximately 2000 feet and enters the Columbia
River.
A single unconfined aquifer, the Troutdale Aquifer, was identified beneath the
site. The water level in the Troutdale was measured to be 10 feet above mean sea
level, and was found approximately 10 feet below the. surface of the impoundment
area. The pr~dominant groundwater flow direction was northwest. A localized shallow
. aquifer was found in the vicinity of the impoundment area. The water table in the
shallow aquifer was 15 feet above mean sea level. .
Groundwater is used by upgradient facilities for irrigation and potato processing.
Drinking water is provided by the city of Portland and does not originate from the
vicinity of the site. .
E. Site Geoloay
Three geologic units were encountered during the RI. In order of depth from
th~ surface, they are the Holocene alluvial deposits of the Columbia River, Pleistocene
post-glacial deposits, and the Pliocene Troutdale formation. 10 addition, the site is
un~erlain by fill such as metal scraps, demolition debris, and automotive debris.
There was no visible contamination in the area formerly containing the .
administration buildings, or in the layout area. The impoundment area was visibly
contaminated. The area was covered. with a friable, greenish material (plating waste)
to a depth of 2 to 6 inches, and covered in dead grasses. Trees in the area were
dead and the bark was visibly blue green. The water io.the pond was dark green.
The impoundment area was remediated during the Removal Action (described
in Section X). All contaminated soil. vegetation, and debris were removed. The
in:tpoundment area is currently graded and covered with rock. .
F. Ecoloaical Conditions
The .ecological conditions in the vicinity of the Allied site can be categorized into
three types of habitats: an urban industrial area. a riparian (riverbank) area north of
the backfill area. and the Columbia Slough. Section IX of this Decision Summary
describesth"ese habitats in detail. ." . .' '. ..' -- ~ ."
-------
III. SITE HISTORY AND ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES
Available data indicate that prior to 1947, the site was vacant land most likely
utilized as pasture. The property was owned by the Hodes family. In 1947, the site
was leased for use as a wrecking yard. In 1957, the building was leased by Mr.
Ernest Stierly as the site for the Allied Plating, Inc., chrome plating facility which
operated from that year until 1984 when the company declared bankruptcy. and
ceased operations.
Prior to 1969, wastewater from the facility was discharged to the swale leading
to the Slough. After 1969, when backfilling isolated the property, liquid wastes from
the plating process were discharged to the pond on site. The metals in the plating
wastewater precipitated out, forming a layer of plating waste at the bottom of the
pond. Aerial-ghotographs indicate that the pond covered the north end of the property
while the company was discharging. When the company ceased discharging, the
pond receded leaving a dry area covered with plating waste.
In 1978, as a result of the discharge of wastewater to the pond, Oregon
Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ) required a compliance schedule for the
installation of an on site wastewater treatment.system. In 1980, ODEQ required the
facility to get an Oregon Water Pollution Control Facility (WPCF) permit, and as a
result of the wastewater discharge, EPA required Allied Plating to submit a Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Part A (hazardous waste permit) application.
In 1981, the facility received interim status as a treatment, storage and disposal
facility under RCRA, and in 1982 a WPCF permit was issued. .
Mr. Stierly contracted with Sweet-Edwards & Associates to install three.
groundwater monitoring wells. These wells were required under Allied Plating's RCRA
Part A interim status. After Allied Plating ceased operations in 1984. the company did
not conduct any additional groundwater monitoring or sampling, and the wastewater
treatment system required by ODEQ was never installed.
..:.. .
In September 1984, the U.S. EPA and ODEQ jointly requested closure and post
closure plans from Mr. Stanley Hodes (the current site owner) as part of a requirement
of a RCRA Part B permit. In January, 1985, the Oregon Department of Transportation
(ODOT) was informed that the pond encroached on the right-of-way of State Highway
99E (MU< Boulevard) and that ODOT shared the responsibility for site cleanup.
Riedel Environmental Services (Riedel) was hired by the ODOT to prepare a
closure plan for the site. Riedel installed 10 monitoring wells, hand-augared for soil
samples at five locations, and collected two Slough sediment samples and five pond
sediment samples. Results from the two studies showed that the groundwa~~r in the
vicinity of the site was contaminated with lead, nickel and chromium, and that there
. . .
-------
were high concentrations of metals in the impoundment area soils (see Allied Plating
RifFS Scoping Report (prepared by URS for EPA, 1990) for the results of the previous
site investigations).
The next two years consisted of submissions of plans and other
communications from the property owner and OOOT to the U.S. EPA and OOEO, and
reviews, comments and requests for further information from the agencies to OOOT
and the property owner. In November 1986, when the closure plans wereHnot
accepted, and actions under RCRA were not able to obtain site cleanup, EPA and
OOEO reached an agreement transferring program jurisdiction from RCRA to
Superfund.
The site was proposed for inclusion on the National Priorities Ust January 22,
1987, and w~s listed February 2, 1990.
EPA conducted a Remedial Investigation (RI) at the site between January 1990
and April 1992. The RI determined that the contamination of the site was mainly
limited to the layer of plating waste formed in the surface of the impoundment area. At
the end of the RI, the site was evaluated for a potential Removal Action as part of the
Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM) Program. The site met the criteria for
remediation by a Removal Action (described in Section X), and between October 20,
and November 10, 1992, the plating waste in the impoundment area was excavated
and shipped off site for disposal at Envirosafe Services, Inc., in Grandview, Idaho (a
facility on EPA's off-site policy list of eligible disposal facilities).
IV. COMMUNITY RELATIONS HISTORY
The RI and proposed Plan for the Allied Plating site were released to t~e public in
April 1993. These documents were made available to the public in the Administrative
Record, located in the information repositories maintained in the EPA Records Center in
Seattle, and at Portland State University's Miller Ubrary and the N.E. Neighborhood
Association in portland, Oregon. The notice of availability of these documents was
published in The Oregonian on April 29, 1993. A ptJblic-comment period was held from
April 28, to May 28, 1993. The Proposed Plan and newspaper notice offered. the option of
having a pubic meeting. However, a meeting was not requested by the public. There
were no comments received during the comment period. The Responsiveness Summary,
documenting that there were no comments received, is included as Appendix A.
,-
-------
To date, the following community relations activities have been conducted by EPA
at the Allied Plating site:
February 1987
September 1987
March 1990
November 1990
June 1991
October 1991
October 1992
April 26, 1993
April 28, 1993
April 26, 1993
May 26, 1993
June 1993
EPA distributed a fact sheet announcing the nomination of the site to
the National Priorities List.
Community Relations Plan published, which included iriterviews from
the community and local officials.
EP A released a fact sheet announcing the site was placed on the
National Priorities Ust.
EP A distributed a fact sheet announcing the beginning of the RI field
work.
EPA released a fact sheet describing the preliminary results of the Rio
Community Relations Plan Schedule updated.
EP A mailed a fact sheet announcing the beginning of the Removal
Action at the site.
EPA mailed the Proposed Plan for No Further Action. In the
Proposed Plan, EPA offered the opportunity for a public meeting. No
request was made.
EPA published a newspaper notice in The Oreaonian announcing the
Public Comment Period and the opportunity for a public .rT:Ieeting.
Public Comment Period begins.
Public Comment Period ends.
. ~: .-
Responsiveness Summary prepared.
v. SCOPE AND ROLE OF OPERABLE UNIT OR RESPONSE ACTION WITHIN SITE
STRATEGY
This ROD addresses the decision for No Further Action at the Allied Plating site. The
contaminated areas of the sit~ were remediated by a Removal Action which took place
from October 20, to Novc;,mber 10, 1993. During the Removal Action, all site.
contamination above EPA's selected health based cleanup levels was excavated and
disposed of in the hazardous waste disposal facilitY , Envirosafe Services, Inqu in
Grandview, Idaho. . " '. .. ,: '. '.,. ' -.
-------
VI. SUMMARY OF SITE CHARACTERISTICS
A. Purpose of the Remedial Investigation
The Purpose of the RI was to investigate the extent of contamination in all media
potentially affected by site activities. The information from the RI and the resulting Risk
Assessment were used to determine the need for, and the extent of, the Removal Action.
Contaminants were released into the environment through the discharge of
wastewater by the plating facility to the northern part of the property, and potentially from
the dumping of waste from the plating operations onto the property. Prior to backfilling
activities, the wastewater flowed to the Slough through natural drainage. Following
backfilling, the wastewater ponded on the property. Metals from the wastewater
precipitated ~ut forming a layer of plating waste covering the surface of the impoundment
area. -
The RI investigated contamination resulting from the direct discharge of wastewater
or dumping of wastes, and the dispersal of these contaminants through the groundwater.
For the soil and sediments investigation phase, samples were taken of the surface
soil (top 6"), shallow soil (to 3') and deep soil (greater than 3') in the site vicinity, the
outfall swale sediment (the location where water drainage from the site had previously
discharged to the Slough), and the Slough bottom sediment.
For the groundwater and surface. water investigation phase, gr(jun~water samples
were collected from 10 wells installed during previous studies (IS series. wells), 14 wells
installed during the RI (MW series wells), and from three commercial wells. Surface water
samples were taken from the pond and the Slough. Water samples were taken twice,
once in January 1991, and again in April 1991. Figures 3 and 4 show the loeations where
the soil, surface water, and groundwater samples were taken.
B. Results of Soil and Sediment Investiaation
1. Inorganics
During the soil sampling phase of the RI, areas both on and off site were identified
as background locations. These locations were selected because they were outside of
the area of known or suspected contamination caused by the plating activities, and thus
would represent vicinity soil quality. Contaminant levels found in the investigation were
compared to background soil samples to determine whether they were the result of site
.
-------
~
tl;'f,13UJ BI.DG. ...
I
'. /
"J
I
/
w~
7
/
I
I
/
--
~ ..-
."810.'
'0.04
8180'
10.0'
111101
'.
".
,
_'01 ell. - - LOC.-
"'_.IP U\CI. NV.-' ,"' - ws!.
(115- -,- I(U -. - LOC.-
-IP U\CI. CUV.-' '". - lit!.
-----~-
co.- 1LG.IGII -- -- - ~-
.cw
. .
.,100
"'AU .....u -- -~-
IIIICI( UN(
-1-
Ilf I
5 /
I ~ /
OJ
I ~ I
$ I
S
is'
(,..
'-"
-Ie ¥"""
-~
.l r-"
wl.1II58ot
"-
I
.
IIIIOa
/
/
/
!
l1li811
-"'*-18
....:
III
"'YOU'
AlII: .
~-
1118"
I
I
~.
o
...
,..:
III
:.c
(J
ii
>-
"
0-
f ~ I
I w I
z
,
,
~
,
p.~'
'V~\~
I~~.
I
~
,
....
o'
. I
CJWiHIC SCALE
120
I
. 120
I.
~
....
j
~'
~
ALLIED PLATING
)
....
I
Figure 3
Remedial Investieation Sampling Locations
. "",. "'-""""".,
-------
SBI1S
'I I I
I'
.
I'
uo>sl L -1- -1-
-1--
-1-
-1-
-1-
-c.....
.--
I"
.-4
.-4
"...
~
"...
~
"...
I
I
~,;"'..,.
LEGEND
,.
~
~.-:.
"... .
'IS4""
~,
~
50
I
~"...
,;"'.. ..
o
! !
GRAPHIC SCALE
(CONTOUR INTERVAL. 1 foon
"...
...
~ 1oIv.Q4B
$IB04
1oI000TORIHC WElL HUIoIBEA AND LOCAnOH
EXlsnHC UQNITORIHC ~Ll HUUBER AHD LOCAnOH
~
"...
-x-
r[He( LINE
Figure 4
Impoundment Area Sampling locations
....""
"...,.."""""
50
I
151 sao~
.1517
SOIL BORINC HUIoiOER ANO LOCAnOH
luPOUNDuEHT SAUPLE HUuBER AHD LOCAtION
.."....
-------
activities or were from other industrial or n'alural sources. Inorganics found on site that
were potentially attributable to the plating activities included antimony, arsenic, beryllium,
cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, mercury, nickel, zinc and cyanide. However,
chromium, copper and nickel' were the only compounds with significant concentrations
above background levels.
The RI determined that the majority of the contamination was limited to the
impoundment area. Table 1 presents the range of values for inorganics detected in the
surface, shallow, and subsurface impoundment area soils. All of the soil samples
collected from the impoundment area exhibited levels of chromium, copper, and nickel
above background concentrations. The greatest concentrations encountered were in
samples of the plating waste layer with consistently high concentrations of chromium (to
20,700 ppm), copper (75,110 ppm), and nickel (to 15,700 ppm). Contamination was
mainly limitect to the top 6 to 12 inches. As depth increased, contaminant concentrations
decreased.
Layout area surface samples exhibited relatively low levels of contamination. The
maximum metal concentrations found were chromium (165 ppm), copper (794 ppm), and
nickel (1930 ppm).
Offsite soil samples were collected at the approximate pre-backfill ground surface
from areas north of the site to evaluate whether contaminants from the plating facility had
migrated along the drainage swale before the placement of the backfill. With the
exception of antimony (16.5 ppm) in one sample, and arsenic (9.8 ppm) and zinc (385
pr;m) ln another, all metals were at background levels.
Outfall swale soil samples contained cadmium (maximum 5 ppm), chromium
(maximum 46 ppm) and copper (maximum 193 ppm) in excess of surface soil
background values. The metal concentrations may be from pre-backfilling plating
discharge or from other industrial sources. Columbia Slough bottom sediment metal
concentrations were similar upgradient and downgradient from the site.
2. Organics
In the impoundment area, toluene (maximum 2 ppb) and xylene (maximum 4 ppb)
were detected at 4 locations. In addition, 1,2-dichloroethene (4 ppb) ~nd trichloroethene
(12 ppb) were detected in one sample. These levels are not signi~Cant. The source of
the organics is ur:"known, but they are corn,monly used for industrial purposes. Polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) were detected at very low concentrations (below required
detection limits) at three locations. PAHs likely came from deposition of car and truck
exhaust. Organics were not detected ,in the layout area soils.
Outfall surface soils and Slough sediments Contained PAHs. When the samples
were collected from the, swate, an', oil sheen was observed on the surface ot the 'Slough.
-------
Table 1
Range of Inorganic Analytical Results
Impoundment Area Soils1
Antimony < 0.55-379 < 5.20-27.56 0.44-14.5
Arsenic 2.20-147 3.8-7.4 2.20-65.0
Beryllium 0.82-1.00 <0.58-0.61 0.52-1.10 .
Cadmium <0.61-10.4 <.78-6.2 <0.49-6.8.
Chromium (Total) 107-20,700 57.1-520 43.1-5400
Cobalt 15.8-51.9 15.6-60.7 13.2-39.8
Copper 88.5-75,100 400-6720 253-15,600
Lead 26.3-573 9.0-518 9.40-975
M
-Nickel 229-15,700 173-31,900 233-3230 .-4
Silver < 0.76-5.6 < 1.0-2.6 <0.20-15.7
Thallium < 0.48- < 25 < 0.52- < 0.72 0.49-6.60
Zinc 116-1280 63.4-2090 64.2-2550
Cyanide < 0.64-229 0.83- < 1.3 < 0.59-249
tAll values are in mg/kg.
1:::::::::jj,:j::::j:::::\j.::::::\\:j':\!j:$.iEsi,:;$:?nlti.:::;::;;:i:if;f1.lli:m;: ;;~ID.ltlltw'~ilil~Dlt :::~D!:11~~:;;N:K~::$.:;::\:ii;;: filillil:;:tIIIJliDi
:::1;,::::.:::::::::::::j::::'::j::::jjjjj:j::j:::tj:::::::::'!l9.i.1;i,~;\::::::\:j::;::::::j;;t[:rt~:::;ill: ;;;;i~fifi~iliiliM~;1;\~;t.g'ilmfti,!;:tfJ.H~;M[:m::::;;' ::~i,~(iff.1111!lt~::@1:.,;,::' i~t ,::':i::I:*:ili::~::::;::
"
-------
It is likely that the PAHs in the surface soils bf the swale resulted from PAHs in the
Slough.
3. Soil Results Summary
Site related contamination was primarily inorganic, and mainly limited to the surface
soil of the impoundment area. This area was covered with a layer of plating waste.
There was little or no site related contamination in the layout area, the outfall swale soils,
or the Slough sediments.
Low levels of volatile organics were found in the impoundment area. The source of
these contaminants is unknown, but probably the result of the industrial activities in the
site vicinity. PAHs were found in the impoundment area, the outfall swale, and the
Slough. Th6-PAHs on the site probably resulted from contamination from MLK Boulevard.
The sourc~ of the P AHs contamination in the swale sediment, and the sediment of the
Slough is unknown; but likely was not related to historical activities at the site.
C. Results of Groundwater and Surface Water Investigation
Samples of groundwater taken during early site investigations (see Section III)
indicated that contamination from the site (chromium, nickel, and lead) was Widespread in
the Troutdale and shallow aquifers in the vicinity of the site. However, the results of the
RI indicated that the contamination has dissipated.
1. Water Level Elevations
The water table was found at two elevations. A shallow aquifer with water at .15
feet above mean sea level was found beneath the impoundment area (wells IB-6 and IB-8)
and to the northeast of the site (well MW-10A). The Troutdale aquifer was found at 10
feet above mean sea level throughout the area. The pond water level was at 15 feet
above mean sea level, the same level as the shallow aquifer. .
2. Inorganics
'...'.
Concentrations of inorganics exceeding background values were detected in all
groundwater samples. Concentrations were relatively low, and only a few of the inorganic
contaminants exceeded either promulgated or proposed Maximum Contaminant Levels
(MCLs) for groundwater (drinking water standards).
The highest concentrations of potential plating waste derived contaminants
(chromium, nickel, and lead) were detected in the mQnitoring wells installed in the shallow
aquifer adjacent to the pond (wells 1806 and 1808). Ta~le 2 presents the analytical results
for samples collected from these wells. . Only nickel was found above MCLs lexceeding
the nickel standard of 100 ppm in 18-6). Samples collected froni monitoring welfs"in the
-------
Table 2 .
Inorganic Analytical Results
Monitoring Wells IB06 and IB081 .
-=-~~
Arsenic 4.10 1.8 <3.00 5.80
Berjllium < 1.00 < 1.00 < 1.00 < 1.00
Cadmium <3.00 <3.00 <3.00 < 3.00
Chromium <5.00 <5.00 17.9 15.8
Chromium + . <0.90 <10.0 < 1.00 < 10.0 .
Cobalt 9.5 4.5 < 5.00j 5.50
Copper 11.7 <7.07 67.9! 49.9
Lead 9.4 6.4 14.5 7.60
Manganese 3010 2510 5310 3960
'Nickel 655 690 29.0 45.0 ~
......
Thallium <2.00 <2.00 <2.00 <2.00
Zinc 223 257 36.9 20.2
1 All values are in ug/kg.
-------
Troutdale aquifer zone generally contained lower concentrations of the potential plating
waste derived contaminants. Results from several wells are shown in Table 3.
Manganese concentrations in the Troutdale aquifer were significantly elevated
above background levels both upgradient (Le. 11,800 ppb in MW07C, and 17,300 ppb in
MW048) and downgradient (Le. 17,700 ppb in MW-13A). The source of the manganese
is unknown, but it was not associated with plating operations at the site.
Water samples collected from three water supply wells had detectable
concentrations of arsenic, cobalt, copper, lead, and zinc. The localized groundwater flow
in the area indicates that these contaminants were not migrating from the Allied site, and
all results were below applicable MCLs.
The_f!1etal concentrations detected in the pond surface water samples were similar
to levels detected in the shallow groundwater samples from the impoundment area (18-6
and 18-8). The inorganics analytical results of the impoundment area surface water are
presented in Table 4.
There were no significant trends in metal concentrations detected in the surface
water samples collected from the Slough that can be associated with releases from the
site. Nickel was detected downgradient from the site (maximum 24 ppb). However, there
was no nickel detected in the groundwater from the wells nearest the Slough. The
remaining contaminant levels were below detection limits or were similar upstream and
downstream from the site.
3. Organic Compounds
Two volatile organic compounds were detected above MCLs during the
investigation. Trichloroethene was detected in water samples from MW12C (maximum 6
ppb) slightly above the MCL of 5 ppb during both sampling events. This well monitors
groundwater in the Troutdale aquifer northeast of the impoundment area. This compound
was not detected in the water samples collected from the other wells. Carbon tetrachlo-
ride was detected at 13.5 ppb in MW16A in the January water sample (above the MCL of
5 ppb). This compound was also detected in April water samples from five wells, ranging
in concentration from 0.2 to 2.0 ppb. A number of other organic compounds were
detected at low concentrations (below MCLs) in the wells including chloroethane,
1,2-dichloroethane, chlorobenzene, 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene, toluene, and
tetrachloroethene. The organic contaminants were probably related to the industrial
activities in the site vicinity. .
Volatile organic compounds were not detected in the January pond water samIJles.
Chloromethane was detected at low levels in the. April sampling event (maximum 2.0 ppb).
,
-------
Table 3
Inorganic Analytical Results
Monitoring Wells MW08A, MW13A, and 18101
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Chromium +
Cobalt 11.90
Copper 12.0
Lead 2.80
. Manganese 11,700
Nickel < 20.0
Thallium <2.00
Zinc 12.0
1 All val~es are in ug/kg.
:,:~'~:::~:~::'.::'19nUgrlni:::}%~lljjj.g~~ji::;:::::jt: :j;;iliij;i;::;j;1;lIijfi!r::;~:::: """.:;i!J.i1i.tll~::~t~~r, ;j;j:ii:::i~m::ri::::)i,;iI9iiit!ii!ng::ml:}.m:...A1:~:*:~]~;:i;:::iij::::.
:"':'::'.:::::.:.:::[in~!'il.:::~~:..:.~::::::.;::. :.:.::.::j:::jj:::::..:.i::!pi~t:::.:::i:::~::::::::j::::: .:::j:::ij::::::::::::lj::liuU:!lli.ii!filllm: :::i:iii::mi:::::::j::IRrU)i::mj;:j~::t;:: !::r::::j::i:11~ingg~1!::!!::::::::::::::~ :j::j;:::::l~m::~flpm~::jr~i:ijj!:!:ji::!!:j;
<4.7 <2.00 7.30 9.90 6.60 <2.90
< 1.00 1.50 < 1.00 1.30 < 1.00 < 1.00
<3.00 <2.20 4.50 4.10 <3.00 3.5"
<5.00 <2.00 <5.00 2.90 <5.00 <2.00 .
<0.70 < 1.00
< 5.00 < 2.00
< 10.0 <7.00
4.00 4.5 .
590 572
< 20.0 < 16.0 .
< 2.0 < 2.00
36.1 87.2
<16.9
<25.0
<2.00
9690
<16.0
< 1.00
22.2
9.40
<10.0
4.60
11,900
.<20.0
<2.00
<10.0
6.40
<7.00
8.00
9300
<16.0
<2.00
46.9
"
.-4
-------
Table 4
Inorganic Analytical Results
Impoundment Area Surface Water1
.tll_iii='~~..
Arsenic 3.20 < 1.00 3.30
Beryllium '< 1.00 < 1.00 < 1.00
Cadmium <3.00 <4.40 <3.00
Chromium .' 20.1 16.8 15.9
Chromium + 23.8
Cobalt : <5.00 <2.00 <5.00
Copper : 188 121 171
Lead <3.20 1.80 <3.90
Manganese 125 70.7 115
Nickel 440 206 364
Thallium .<2.00 <2.00 <2.00
Zinc 57.0 23.9 49.6
tAll values are in ug/kg.
]M~:::::!lilpfUJI:m]m; . .
1.90
< 1.00
<2.0
10.0
2.00
<6.20
113
<2.00
83.1
229
< 1.00
32.4
3.30
< 1.00
<3.00
15.9
<5.00
167
<4.10
114
368
2.00
47.0
I
!
. ,
I,
.
--
<2.10
. 110
<2.00
'87.6
210
< 1.00 .
34.9
co
-------
Concentrations of three voiatile orgahic compounds were detected in the Slough
surface water samples collected during both sampling events. The maximum
concentrations were cis-1, 2-dichloroethane (0.8 ppb), trichloroethane (2 ppb), and
tetrachloroethane (3 ppb). No semi-volatile organic compounds were detected.
4. Surface Water and Groundwater Results Summary
. '. .. '.',". Conta~i~ation le~els' resultir;'lg f~~m si.te activ.ities appear to nave decr~aSed from. . . -
j~;:i'~"i~~~~6~~:~~~~_~2f~4~~iJ1t~~~y,..,;,....,..
. wells were below MCLs. The sh~ill()w aquifer beneath the site contain'ed elevated levers of' .
nickel. Concentrations in IB-6 were above the MCL for nickel (100 ppb). Nickel
concentrations in the pond water were also elevated. Manganese is the other.
contaminant.of note in the groundwater. High levels were found in the Troutdale .aquifer
upgradient and downgradient from the site. The source of the manganese is unknown.
VII. REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR ADDRESSING SITE RISKS
. .
EPA's National Oil and Hazardous Substance Contingency Plan (NCP), found in 40
C.F.R. Part 300, requires that the site's remediation goals are protective of human health
and the environment. For water, contaminant concentrations are compared to existing
criteria such as the Safe Drinking Water Act Maximum Contaminant Level Goals (MCLGs).
However, there are no corresponding criteria for soils. Federal remediation standards for
cancer-causing chemicals are usually established by setting contaminant concentrations
at levels that ensure cancer risks are maintained at or below acceptable I.evels. The EPA
acceptable risk range for an increase in the potential number of cases of cancer is
between one-in-ten-thousand excess cancers per ten thousand people, and one-in-one-
million excess cancers per one million people. For non carcinogenic toxic effects, the
effects from the contaminants are measured by a .Hazard Index., and cleanup levels are
set at a Hazard Index of 1. An exceedance of the Hazard Index of 1 indicates that there
may be toxic effects from exposure. Adverse health effects would not be expected if the
Hazard Index is less than or equal to 1.
VIII. SUMMARY OF SITE RISKS
A. Risk Assessment Rationale
The risks to human health and the environment at the Allied Plating Superfund Site
Prior to the Removal Action are described in the site-specific Remedial Investigation
Baseline Risk Assessment, which was completed in 1992 by URS Consultants, Inc., for
EPA, using EPA guidance. This document contains a Human Health Risk Assessment
(Risk Assessment) and an Ecological Evaluation. The Risk Assessment followed a four
step process: .1) an evaluation of data to identify co'ntaminants which are qtpo~e~tial
concern at the site, 2)' an exposure assessment to identify current and potential exposure
-------
" .
. .
.' ."
, "
I ...-'
, .
pathways and exposure estimates, 3) a toxicity assessments for the chemicals of potential
concern to determine concentrations having adverse effects, and 4) a risk
characterization, which integrates the three earlier steps to summarize the current and
potential risks posed by hazardous substances at the site,
The results of this Risk Assessment were used to determine the need for a
'. Removal Action at the 'site. "Following the Removal Action, a final evalu.ati0rl of t~~
.:~ :,: residu~1 site risks V-jas' perfocmed :to ~nsur~ that the site met the .selected ,clean.up ,. . , ' , ...,,'."
~~~J~~' ectiv.~,...;t7he':~S'u~o" t~" "'Ii' ' ,0" ...«(., 'sl(A$SA~sment~e:.discussedJ)eJp~~.~, >t'
, "'f~;,~~:. "f.'<'~' o".~:,~.J:~o.I"~~'~">j\f. ...-i". 0 0 .' . .' :y.~,~,~~o~4~;,!....~f'~"'''!
, " ErreslJ sopt- the :T1na nsK eva1ua on are. IscuSse, 0'1'1 SeCtton ox; ',~ '''', '. : ~.", " . " ", """. .,..'
. .' .'. .- ,,~.... '",' , ~. . .' . . .', ". ° .' ;.. . "", ,'.':':. ' .0.'." ,; .
B. Determination of Contaminants of Concern .
The s-oits, groundwater and surface water at the Allied Plating Site were sampled
during the RI for potential contaminants, including metals, inorganics, and volatile and
semi-volatile organics. The results were compared to EPA Region 10 preliminary
screening concentrations (comparison concentrations for determining the significance of a
contaminant) for water and soil. For the most part, screening concentrations for soil were
based on a carcinogenic risk of 1 x 10.7 or a noncancer Hazard Index of 0.1; and those
for water were based on a carcinogenic risk of 1 x 1 O~ or a noncancer Hazard Index of
0.1. The contaminants that were not eliminated on the basis of screening concentrations,
were included in the risk assessment as contaminants of potential concern.
The contaminants of potential concern identified in the risk assessment included
the following: for soils, antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, copper,
lead, mercury, nickel, and cyanide; for groundwater, manganese.
C. Exposure Assessment
The objective of the exposure assessment was to estimate the type and magnitude
of exposures from the site. This included identifying land usage, exposure routes,
potentially exposed populations, estimating exposure point concentrations (contaminant
concentrations that the affected individual is exposed to), and describing assumptions
about exposure frequency and duration of exposure.
1. Land Usage
The site is currently used for industriaJ purposes. It can be distinguished by two
primary areas: the -Layout Area- and -'mpoundment Area-. The layout area is occupied
by a crane maintenance facility. The impoundment area, occupying the northern end of
the site, contained a pond, which was known to have received plating wastes fro'm the
Allied Plating facility. This area is not used as part. of current site operations.
.
-------
Drinking water in the vicinity of the'site is provided by the city of Portland. Nearby
water supply wells are used for industrial processes and irrigation.
In the future, it is most probable that the area will remain industrial. However,
residential use of the area is a remote possibility. Therefore the risk assessment
examined both a future industrial and a future residential scenario.
2. Exposure Pathways
Land uses were used to determine exposure pathways for contact with the
contaminants. Exposure pathways and associated assumptions for each land use are
identified in Table 5 and Figure 5. These exposure pathways were then combined into
the following scenarios:
Current Industrial Scenario: Employees would receive exposures dermally, via
ingestion, or by inhalation of contaminants in soil. Because exposure to
contaminated groundwater currently does not occur, groundwater was not
assessed as a possible route of exposure.
Future Industrial Scenario: In addition to the exposures described above, the
scenario assumes the ingestion of groundwater.
Future Residential Scenario: Residential exposure pathways are the same as the
Future Industrial pathways. In addition, because residential usage of potable water
is likely to include bathing, inhalation of volatile contaminants from groundwater
was an additional pathway considered for the residential scenario.
3. Exposure Point Concentrations:
Exposure point concentrations were estimated for average and reasonable
maximum exposures. The average case exposure (ACE) represents average exposure
associated with the site. The reasonable maximum exposure (RME) is a worst case
estimate of exposure which is still within the range.of..ppssible exposures. EPA guidance
recommends that decisions regarding remediation at Superfund sites should be based on
RME estimates rather the average, since a significant portion of the population may
experience exposures higher than the ACE. However, an evaluation based on the
average is useful for illustrating the degree of uncertainty associated with the RME. ACE
and RME cases were evaluated for the residential land use scenario. Only the RME case
was evaluated for the industrial scenarios.
For the exposure point concentrations, the arithmetic averages of the contaminant
concentrations were used for the purpose of estimating average exposures (ACE) and the
upper 95 percent confidence limit of this average was used to estimate re~!Jn~bl.e
-------
Table 5
Summary of Pathway-Specific Exposure Assumptions'
::.::.:~i!'~!~~~:.:::i:illlj!:i:llil:i:jii::jll.j!.:i;i!::!:~I~~~~....::I...I..j.j;~~li"11.Y~:li:
Soil Ingtition
Pan. Inhalation
G. Water Ingtition
Inhalation (VOC)
All Pathways
Exposure Prequency days
Ingestion Rate mg/day
PEF m Ikg
Inhalation Rate m Iday
Exposure Prequency days
Ingestion Rate L/day
Exposure Prequency days
Inhalation Rate m Iday
Volatilization C. L/m
Exposure Time minutes
Exposure Frequency days
Exposure Duration yr
Body Weight kg
child
adult
100 50
IJE+O IJE+O IJB+.
20 20 20
275 350 250
1.4 2.0 I
275 350 .250
15 15 . . -
J . J
10 10 - .
275 350 N
N
". 6
9 24 2.S
15
70 70 70
.. "
child
adult
child
adult
a Taken Crom U.S. EPA (1991h) and U.S. EPA (19918) guidanc:e unless otherwise Indic:ated.
b Current industrial scenario: 1900 c:m2. Puture Industrial scenario: 5000 c:mZ'
c: See Sec:tion 6.5.4 oC RI.
d Taken rrom U.S. EPA Interim Guidanc:e ror Dermal Risk Assessment (U.S. EPA, 1991c:).
ACE Average case exposure.
RME Reasonable maximum exposure.
I
-------
~'''''''''''''-'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''':~'''''''''''''''''''''''''''',.,.,."".,.""",,,'.."'.-.'.. ".",.-.-..".,.,.,..,.,.,,,,,.,.,.,.,.,,,,,.,.,,,,""""'.'''''''''''''''-''-'-'''-~'''''~'-'-'-'4-'''-AA;.~#>''''''''''''-'''''''''''~"""""'''''''''l'...-.....".......,,,,.....,............,...,...,.....,.,.'.. ,'."-'.'...'.'.',"""'."',""'" .','","",,"'.'.
>
w
a:
:::>
(f)
o
Q..
X
W
t-
<..>
w
a:
a
:z
~ .
~
,
i
Air
WIND TRANSPORT
~
VOlA1UZATION
'.'.',""-'.'.'.','.'.'.'.'.'.'.','.','..'.'.'.
."",-,."",.,...,.,-,."""-""",,,'","""-.1","","''''...................'''''-',-,,--'......-.-._n,""".'A"""'.V.l".'.'...,..-.I"........'.'.'....'.v.-.'.""-,,,,'...'.'.','.-.v.".'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'...-...'.'.''''''.'.'"""-'.I".,.,...............-_v."""'''''''''''''''''~
.,
w
<..>
a:
:::>
o
(f)
Upper
Aquifer
lower.
Aquifer
~
1
I
~
;
,
,
i
~
~
i
~
>
~
j
~
~
>
.l
~
~
t
{
I
~
. !
"-'...-.n'oVo/'..-.-.--_...--....d:
Ingestion
r
;
~
~
~
<
~
!
;
~:
i
i
I
i
~
Soils
Groundwater
PEROOlATION
lEAKAGE
~
< W ;
:: a: ~
i ~ Ii
., ~
, x
l W
~ t- ~
~ <..> }
! W ~
~ a:. ~
< - ~
~ a ~
L__.J~M~'" ~
Dennal Contact
.'
I . .
. ' ", . .
'. . . .' .
. - .
. .
. f-<;;%\~~-~~;(?.
.,.' Huma~.H~lth~.EijM;tsure Pathways
". ".. : : ~., .,' :" ~ . -. ',' '. ~ ': ". .~" . .". . .'. -, . .', '. . .
. AIled Ptdng .
Portland: Oregon
..: ~
. '.
-.
.. ".
.: :~' .", . ~.::. ",.. .
:.: ;'" '.::.-~. ,::"
~ -:',"'., .:~;. . i-;;..~:'t.
.:.-;;.",.~:,,,, ~_I'-
. ".:~ :~'\;'.:~".
. .:~<: .':,:~{" .':=-:
-
<~.;.:{;'?~l~~ ~..,.
23
, ."
. ';':.
- :~:':'i.,::...
-------
maximum exposure (RME). These values are shown in Table 6.
For current land use, the exposure point concentrations for soil were calculated
using concentrations found in surface soil samples. The use of surface soil data assumes
minimal disturbance of surface soil from site activities.
For future land use, the exposure point concentrations for soil were <::alculated
using concentrations found in surface, shallow, and composite samples taken from
depths ranging to 3 feet. The use of soil samples from these depths assumes that
construction of industrial or residential facilities on the site, along with grading, will result
in disturbance of soils resulting in exposure to different soil depths, and mixing of soils.
As the probability of using the shallow aquifer for a drinking water source was
minimal, only...data for the Troutdale aquifer wells located on site were used for the
. purposes of evaluating the risk of consuming groundwater under future land use
scenarios.
D. Toxicitv Assessment
1. Cancer Risks
Excess lifetime cancer risks were determined for each exposure pathway by
multiplying the exposure level by the chemical-specific cancer potency (slope) factors.
Chemical-specific cancer potency factors have been developed by EPA from human'
epiGemiological or animal studies. This information was obtained fr9JT1 EPA's Integrated
Risk Information System (IRIS) and the Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables
(HEAST). Risk estimates calculated from these potency factors reflect a conservative
"upper boundu estimate of the risk posed by potentially carcinogenic compou~ds. That is,
the true risk is very unlikely to be greater than the risk predicted and could be
substantially lower. The resulting risk estimates are expressed in scientific notation (i.e. 1
x 10~. for 1/1,000,000; indicating that, in this example, an individual is not likely to have
greater than a one in one million chance of developing cancer over his/her lifetime as a
result of site-related exposure). Current EPA practice assumes Carcinogenic risks are
additive between chemicals when assessing exposure to a mixture of hazardous
substances. Therefore, cancer risks have been summed across chemicals and across
exposure pathways.
The carcinogens at the site were arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, hexavalent
chromium, and nickel. .
2. Noncancer risks
. .
Potential concern for noncarcinogenic effects of a single contaminant JD a single
medium is expressed as a Hazard Quotient. A Hazard .Quotient is calculated by' diViding
-------
Table 6
Exposure Point Concentrations
u~.?, . ,.;.' N "
...."..N ',......-., "
Wf.X~9!.1 $iW~." ~>, ')19111, -...-, .,~" ". IJji
. '. ....... .. ''''',
AIIt1moIIy .5.11B+04 1.19B+o.s 1.98B + 04 3.91B+04 .5.32B+03 8.CI5B+03 4.1OB+CO 6.108+ 03 - - Not. 1 Not. 18+04
Anellie 4.468+04 8.01B+04 UtB+04 3.43B+04 1.778+03 3.118+CO 339B+03 4.S8B+03 - - o.as 1 . 48+1 8B+CO
BeryitilllD 7.508+01 8.9S8+01 7.43B+01 8.06B+02 9.358+01 1.208+03 1JIB+02 9091B+02 6.21841 7.70841 0.02 28+1 '18+1 18+.5
Caclmlum 3.418+03 5.748+CO 1.238+03 3,.06B+03 1.048+02 1.418+CO .5.'NB+02 . 1.108+02 2.938+00 3.2'78+00 Not. 28.+0 2.18+S Not.
OuomIum +. .5.698+ 06 1.068+07 2.608+06 4.10B+06 4.2'78 +04 1.768+04 12OB+04 $.268+04 - - Not. 48+3 Not. 48+3
O"omlum06 4.Q9B+04 7.648+04 1.8'78+04 2.9S8+04 3.07B+02 6.3OB+02 2.3OB+02 3.798+02 - - Not. 28+1 48+2 Not.
{.-Cobalt 3.13B+04 4.358+04 1.S7B+ 04 3.OOB+04 2.61B+04 3.1'78+04 2.238+04 16,38+04 6.698+00 9.008+00 - - Not. US+,
Copper 1.89B+07 3.638+07 8.89B+06 1.418+07 U4B+o.s 6.13B+1I5 2.62B+o.s 4.79B+05 - - Not. S8+2 Not. 28+'
LcacI 1.808+o.s 2.868+o.s 1.7SB+o.s 2JIB+o.s .5.188+04 9.998+04 S.99I!+04 6JQB+04 .5ASB+OO 7.348+00 Not. Not. NA Not.
ManPD- - - - - - - - - 4.788+03 6.68B+CO Not. 18+2 Not. m+,
N"1Ctc1 43.58+06 a.so8+06 3.198+06 ~.os8+06 7,428+o.s 1,418+06 . .s.t18+o.s 9.128+o.s - ';- Not. 78+1 28+4 .58+.5
'IbaIlI1IID 3.31B+03 6.83B+03 1.878+03 3.07B+03 2.778+02 3.06B+02 2.7SB+02 S.QSB+02 9.66&01 t.008+00 Not. G.3 Not. 28+S
Catboo Tetn- - - - - - - - - aJ3B.Ol U78+oo G.3 m+o .58+2 28+4
cII10rlcIe
OIlorolorID - - - - - - - - .5.71841 7A6S41 G.3 28+1 18+4 m+.5
cPAli I.4.5B+03 1.478+03 I.39B+03 1.598+03 - .;.. lASB+CO 1.sOB+03 - - 0.7 Not. 68+0 Not.
ACE .. ~\'Cn&C - upoIure
RMB . ReuoDable awdmum exposure
If'\
N
-------
the human dose by the reference dose (RiO) or other suitable benchmark for
noncarcinogenic health effects. RfDs, expressed in units of mgjkg-day, are estimates of
lifetime daily exposure levels for humans, including sensitive individuals, that are not
expected to cause an appreciable risk of harmful effects during a lifetime. Estimated
intakes of chemicals from environmental media (e.g., the amount of a chemical ingested
from contaminated drinking water), can be compared to the RfDs. RfDs are derived from
human epidemiological studies or animal studies to which uncertainty factors have been
applied (e.g., to account for the use of animal data to predict effects on humans). RfDs
used in this risk assessment are from IRIS. The Hazard Quotients from site
contaminants are then added within a media or across all media to which a population is
likely to be exposed. This produces the Hazard Index. Adverse health effects are not
expected to occur if the Hazard Index is less than 1. As the Hazard Index increases
above 1, adverse effects become more likely.
The chemicals at the site which could cause noncancer toxic .effects were
antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, trivalent and hexavalent chromium, cobalt, copper,
and nickel.
E. Risk Characterization
Estimated risks from all scenarios are shown in Table 7
1. Sitewide Risks
The sitewide risks for current and future land use represenfihe sum of risks from
exposure to impoundment area soil, I~yout soil, and groundwater on site.
Assumptions were used to estimate the proportion of time spent in each of the
two areas on site based on site usage. These assumptions were as follows:
current Industrial scenario: 5 percent of time spent in the impoundment area
and 95 percent. in the layout area
'....'-.
future industrial scenario: 50 percent of time spent in the impoundment area and
50 percent in the layout area, and ingestion of g~oundwater
future residential scenario (ACE): 25 percent of time spent in the impoundment
area and 75 percent in layout area, and ingestion of groundwater
future residential scenario (RME): 50 percent of time spent in the impoundment
area and 50 percent in the layout area, and ingestion of groundwater.
Carcinogenic risk for all scen~rios was less than or equal to 1 x 10-4. r- -
-------
.,
Table "7
Carcinogenic Risk and Non Carcinogenic Risk Indices for Risk Assessment Scenarios
:~~'m;~t "~~~i~b"{ 0.23 lx10~ 1.18 ; 8x10~ 0.18 8xl0~
~4t t~&;~::~:~~f~~~i;~;~~~::;;~J;:;. 1.2 ~xlO~ 0.55 4xl0~ 0.14 8xl0~ 0.86 bl0'"
4.39 lxl0~ 3.45 1x10~ 0.49 4x10~ 1.41 4x10""
1~(~:If.mi~f.]~~~~W' 1.3 lxl0~ 0.71 1xl0~ 0.16 4xl0" 1.01 5x1r
scenario,",>.,".,"'W~;~iK' ~i~~~~~i;~";J:;:i:t]
.....
N
-------
Noncarcinogenic Hazard Indices exceed a Hazard Index of 1 except the current
industrial land use scenario, which was less than 1.
The Risk Assessment determined that the risk associated with the site resulted
from the contamination in the impoundment area. The risks from the two site areas and
groundwater are discussed below.
2. Impoundment Area
The carcinogenic risks associated with the industrial and future residential ACE
scenarios were less than 1x10-4. The future residential RME risk was greater than 1x10-4.
The contaminants contributing to the majority of the carcinogenic risks were arsenic,
nickel, chromium +6, and PAHs.
Hazard Indices for both the current industrial and future residential RME scenarios
exceeded 1. The future industrial and future residential ACE scenarios were less than 1.
The chemicals contributing to the majority of the Hazard Indices were copper, nickel,
cobalt, arsenic, and antimony.
These risk values were based on exposure to an averaged concentration and
include assumptions related to mixing the soil based on potential site activity. The plating
waste in the impoundment area was present as a surface layer." Therefore a separate
analysis was run to determine the risks associated with one of these "hot spots".
Table 8 shows the RME soil concentrations of inorganic contaminants of concern
compared with the concentrations in Location 1526, a sample of plating waste in the
impoundment area. The table also shows the noncarcinogenic Hazard Indices and the
carcinogenic risks associated with these contaminant concentrations. The residential and
industrial Hazard Indices exceed one (12.21 for residential exposure and 1.77 for industrial
exposure). The majority of the risk resulted from copper, nickel and arsenic. The cancer
risk from the plating waste were greater thai11x10-4 for the residential scenario and less
than 1 x1 0-4 for the industrial scenario.
"a;'.,
3. Layout Area
The carcinogenic risk values for layout area soil were below 1x10-4. The major
contaminants contributing to the risk were nickel, P AHs, arsenic, and beryllium.
" Noncancer Hazard Indices were less than 1. Chemicals contributing to these
Hazard Indices were cobalt, nickel, antimony, "arsenic. and copper.
r
-------
Table 8.
Risk Results for Inorganic Contaminants 01 Potential Concern in Hot Spot
I;c...~.
AIIlimony \.\98+05 1.&\8+04 0.66 o.U 0.10 - ' , - 1918+04 '..18t04 a.oo 0,)6 0.13 - -
Atwnic '.0\8+04 1.448 + 03 \.&0 0.1) 0.23 2.98134S S~64S '.4'8tOf 1."8t03 U.o 0..1 L'76 ,... ,4.UB044
Beryllium I.9SS + 02 &.1OS + 02 0.92 '.69E4S 0.00 7.02s.47 "~1W7 '.068+02 1J08+02 1.02 S.98004 ~ SM8006 SJ98.CIS
C.dmium $.74S+03 7.74S+03 US O.~ 0.00 1.64 s.47 2.218047 '.060+03 7.'48-43 2.S, G.02 o.os 1.48&07. . 1'HB47
Qromium.) 1.06S+07 \.74S+07 \.64 0.00j 0.0\ - 4.\OOt06 1.'H8t07 4.24 G.02 CI.OI - '. -
,-
o.romium~ 7.64S+04 \JZS+03 \.n 0.007 0.0\ \.~E4S 2.S1e.GS 2.9$8+04 1.n8t05 ..., 0.02 0.09 'Jm411 4J68.4S
Coball 4J$S+04 4J\8+04 \,04 0.16 0.17 - - 1OO8+0f 4J\8+04 1JO 0.16 G.34 - -
Copper 3.638 + 07 7.O\S+07 \,93 0.48 0.93 - - \.4\8+07 7.o\Bt07 .' 437 lJ9 6,91 - -
Lud U6E+Cti 4,0\S+03 \,40 - - - - U1Bt03 4.o18t05 , t.60 - - - -
Nicke' 8J08+06 9J98+06 \.\0 Ul 0.23 U4E4S U6B04S S.03B+06 939B+06 l.u 0.92 1.71 ' 3J84S' U680QS
Thallium 6.&38+03 USB + 04 \.83 0.04 0.09 - - '.078 t 03 1.2.58+04 4.07 O.U o.6S - -
TOT AI. b 1.18 1.77 4E4S 18004 14' 12.21 2&Of U1B-4
"
0'\
N
. 15-26 is a sample of plating waste from the impoundment area
b Risk numbers have been rounded for the table, column totals calculated from unrounded numbers.
I,
-------
4. Groundwater
The carcinogenic risks associated with groundwater ingestion were below 1x10-4.
Beryllium contributed the majority of the risk. However, beryllium was not found on site at
elevated levels, and therefore its presence in the groundwater was assumed to result from
non-site related factors.
..
The Hazard Index under the future residential RME scenario exceeded 1. The
majority of the risk was from manganese, which was located at high concentrations in the
groundwater both upgradient and downgradient from the site.
The shallow aquifer beneath the impoundment area contained nickel above federal
drinking water standards. Because the aquifer is shallow and not widespread, it is
unlikely that the shallow aquifer would be used for a drinking water supply well.
Therefore, the risk from nickel was not included in the Risk Assessment.
F. Risk Assessment Uncertainties
The accuracy of the risk characterization depends in large part on the accuracy
and representativeness of the sampling, exposure, and toxicological data. Most
assumptions were intentionally conservative, so the risk assessment will be more likely to
overestimate risk than to underestimate it. Uncertainties and their origins are discussed
below.
1. Data Evaluation
Several of the factors adding uncertainty to the estimates tend to result in
overestimation of the exposure. These include: the directed nature of the sampling
program, the use of upper 95th percentile confidence limits or the reasonable maximum
exposures (RME) for the source concentrations, the use of many 95th-percentile values in
the exposure estimation calculations, and the use of the steady state assumption for
source concentration estimates.
''''-'.
One factor that could lead to underestimation of the exposures is the use of
sample quantitation limits that could result in missing low concentrations of some
compounds that might pose significant risks. The cumulative effect of all exposure
uncertainties most likely is to overestimate rather than underestimate th~ true potential. .
exposures.
2. Toxicity Assessment Uncertainties
The basic uncertainties underlying the assessment of the toxicity of a chemical
indude uncertainties arising from the design, execution or relevance of the ~_cien~fic
studies that form. the basis of the assessment; and uncertainties involved in extrapolating
-------
from the underlying scientific studies to the exposure situation being evaluated, including
variable responses to chemical exposures within human and animal populations, between
species, and between routes of exposure. Risks were assumed to be additive across
multiple chemicals. In reality, exposures to multiple chemicals can cause risks that are
less than additive (antagonism) or more than additive (synergism). However, in the
absence of data on a specific chemical mixture, the assumption of additive risk is
commonly used. Assuming additive risks may underestimate or overestimate risk.
G. Human Health Risk Conclusions
Based on the Risk Assessmp,nt, the Allied Plating facility was a moderate risk site.
The plating waste layer in the impoundment area posed a Hazard Index above 1 for both
the residential and industrial scenario (12.21 for residential and 1.77 for industrial), and a
cancer risk);Jreater than 1x10-4 for the residential scenario (5.21x10-4).
The layout area posed an acceptable risk; Hazard Indices were less than 1 and
. carcinogenic risk was less than 1 x1 0-4. Groundwater posed a carcinogenic risk less than
1x10-4. The Hazard Index associated with drinking the groundwater was associated with
manganese which is not a site related contaminant, and therefore would not be the focus
of any site specific remedy..
IX. ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT
A. Ecoloaical Profile
Ecological conditions in the vicinity of the Allied Plating site can be categorized into
the following three kinds of habitats:
An urban industrial area, which includes the site itself, a backfiil area north of
the site, and bordering properties to the south, east, and west of the site;
A riparian area (the bank of the Slough) that occurs to the north of the
backfill area; and .
The Columbia Slough.
The urban industrial area contains sparse habitat suitable for fish and wildlife
populations. Bullfrogs were seen in the pond, and vegetation in this urban industrial.area
has been limited to shrubs, brush, and dense blackberry patches along fence rows.
Riparian communities occur nearly continuously along the entire length of the
Slough. These vegetative communities are highly valued ecological resources because
they act as a buffer between the. slough waters and adjacent lands. Veg~~~tiv~ r~parian
.
-------
communities also provide habitat for a variety of wildlife species, and are important in the
life history of numerous birds, mammals, fish, reptiles, amphibians, and insects.
The Columbia Slough is a turbid, slow-moving, tidally influenced stream. Animal
communities that are highly dependent on the slough habitat include plankton, benthic
invertebrates, fish, birds and mammals.
8. Data Evaluation
For soils and sediments, the focus of the qualitative evaluation was on relative
concentrations of contaminants in soil as judged by comparisons with available
information for background levels, or available sediment quality values. The major
limitation to this approach is that relative ranking based on elevations above background
may not rep!esent relative ranking based on potential toxicity.
For surface water, the evaluation of chemical contaminants was based on
comparisons with chemical-specific ambient water quality criteria (AWQC) for the
protection of aquatic organisms.
C. Ecological Assessment
Based on their site to background ratios of 10 to 100, and available toxicity
information, the trace metals chromium, selenium, arsenic, and mercury in site soils from
the impoundment area had the highest potential toxicity to wildlife.
Based on site.:to-background and ratios of 10 to 100, PAHs were the substances of
greatest concern from the riparian area. The PAHs are not site related.
For the Slough sediments, with the exception of 2-butanone, average
concentrations of all chetnicals of potential concern for which sediment quality values
were available exceeded their corresponding sediment quality values. However, within the
site vicinity, the upgradient and downgradient sediment contaminant concentrations were
similar, therefore contamination could not be linked wfth certainty to the site.
For pond surface water, average concentrations of the following substances
exceeded AWQC values: beryllium, cadmium, hexavalent chromium, copper, nickel and
lead. These comparisons indicate that metal contamination concern in the pond water'
were potentially hazardous to aquatic biota.
For groundwater, the maximum concentrations of bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate and
cadmium exceeded AWQC.
For the Columbia Slough, concentrations of cadmium and lead in the surface water
exceeded AWQC values. However, because of the general poor water quafity 'conditions
-------
in the Slough, and the number of other potential contaminant sources, it is doubtful that
increased levels of cadmium and lead in Slough surface waters can be attributed solely to
historical activities at the Allied Plating site.
x. REMOVAL ACTION
A. Determination to Perform a Removal Action
The Risk Assessment determined that the impoundment area ~as responsible for
the majority of the risks associated with the site. The layer of plating waste covering the
impoundment area posed a potential health threat. The risk associated with the plating
waste in the impoundment area met the criteria for a Removal Action. After consideration
of other potential cleanup options, EPA determined that remediating the site as a pre-
Record of De:cision Removal Action was the preferred option.
The prospect of performing the pre-ROD Removal Action for final site cleanup was
approved by the EPA Superfund Revitalization Organization at EPA Headquarters under
the Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM) program. A Removal Action Memo
which approved the Removal Action was signed in October 1992. EPA signed an
interagency agreement (lAG) with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Missouri
River Division, to perform the Removal Action at the Allied Plating site using the USACE
Rapid Response Program. The Rapid Response Program is a quick turnaround contact
mechanism for site cleanup. .
8. Action Levels
The selected goal of the Removal Action was to clean the site so that the Hazard
Index would be less than or equal to 1, and the excess cancer risk would' be less than or
equal to 1 x1 0-4 for the industrial scenario. EP A determined that the use of the industrial
scenario was appropriate based on the fact that the site and vicinity historically were, and
currently are used for industrial purposes, and would likely stay that way in the Mure. In .
addition, Mure use of the property for building residences would require filling the
impoundment area to the grade of the layout area or the. grade. of MLK Boulevard
(between 5 and 30 feet of fill). Thus, there would not be contact with any residual
contamination.
'Based on information from the Risk Assessment, the contaminants which posed
the majority of the site risk were antimony, arsenic, copper and nickel. Their removal
would leave the site at an acceptable risk level. The action levels for the Removal Action
were based on the assumption that these four major contaminants were present in
equally distributed concentrations. Thus, with four contaminants, the cleanup levels were
set at 1/4 the individual contaminant values equal to a Hazard Index of 1 (these values
were lower than those corresponding to the acceptable cancer risk). The ra!i.onale for
this approach is that the cleanup would result in a Hazard Index that at moSt would be 1
-------
(4 x 1/4), this assumes an additive effect from the chemicals. Excavation continued until
concentrations were below the following:
Antimony
Arsenic
Copper
Nickel
200 mg/kg
150 mg/kg
20,000 mg/kg
10,000 mg/kg
The site remediation progress was monitored and evaluated using an X-Ray
Fluorescence Spectrophotometer (XRF), a field screening tool. Confirmational samples to
provide substantiation that the removal objectives were met were sent to an EPA
approved lab for analysis.
-
C. Removal Action Boundaries
The impoundment area was divided into four sections for the Removal Action
(Figure 6). The delineations were based on the equipment and procedures needed for
each area.
Flat Area - the west side of the pond, relatively dry area covered with dead,
dry grass and approximately six inches of plating waste
, '
Burn Pit - a shallow disposal pit at the south end of the pond containing
burned debris, plating waste and soil
Pond - surface liquid impoundment containing approximately two feet of
water and plating waste contaminated sediment
East Hillside - the steep slope leading to MLK Boulevard, covered with
brush, debris, and a six inch layer of plating waste.
D. Removal Activities
1. Excavation of Contaminated material
Cleanup at the site commenced on Friday, October 23, 1992. The first step of
cleanup was the dewatering and exCavation of the pond. Because the summer preceding'
the Removal Action had been hot and dry, the pond volume was approximately 20% of
the level found during the RI. A six inch pump was used to pump the liquids and
sediments from the pond to a mixing tank where ferric chloride and lime were added to
coagulate the solids. The resulting slurry was then pumped through a filter press to
remove the solids. The filter cake. (from the pond sediments) was stockpil~jor .disposal
and the water placed into 20,000 gallon. baker :tanks for storage. When needed to Sid in
-------
-
I
I
-
I
L
, '
I
-.-
-.-
-1---
-.-
-1-
'--l:,:-
-1-.
".: ;'"
.-
, I
'I'
~ . '..
. .,,\:-
'~';(~~.J/" " I
.....' ,.' .
" . ~. '.
~":::':.\~",:', '
,"':,",i\i:H'~':~' ' ,
" '/<~.'
. ./'" :::;;~:....:!:~~. ;
~ ~\))~ft¥':. """ ',:, "',:
'"
:t.,' .
",
..
'","
."
"
50
I
o
I !
GRAPHIC SCACEl~~
(CONTOUR INTERVAL'. 1 FOOT)
/
.,
, ,'/'
/'"
,,~
0",..... "",n1
Figure 6
A ,.tlnn 1i',YI'nvntion Locations
/
: ~ ;
'~2a..'.;;.~.
. NORTH "~,:, ':.: ! :
,
~
~'
,
,
, I
, ,. . 0'
-------
'.
sediment removal, the water was pumped'through a filter, the pH was adjusted, and the
water was piped back to the pond where the pressure from the resulting water jet was
used to slurry the sediments.
During the dewatering process, as the water level dropped, an excavator pushed
the exposed surfaces of the pond edges toward the center of the pond. The combination
of slurrying the sediments, pumping out water and sediments, and "squeegeeing" of the
sediments to the middle, allowed the edges of the pond to be continually backfilled with
12" to 18" diameter rock (brought in from a local quarry), bringing both ends toward the
middle, culminating in complete backfill. At the end of the process, all of the pond water
had been removed and stored in baker tanks. 70,000 gallons of pond water and 120
tons of filter cake produced from the dewatering operation were generated for disposal.
The flat area was excavated to a depth of six inches which included grass, plating
waste and soil around the grass roots. Approximately 285 tons of soil and debris were
excavated.
The burn pit was excavated to a depth of three feet and then backfilled with 6" to 9"
diameter rock. Approximately 175 tons of soil and debris were excavated.
The excavator was used to scrape six inches to one foot from dry sediment areas
around the perimeter of the pond during pond dewatering. Approximately 280 tons of soil
were excavated.
Backfilling of the pond allowed access to the east hillside for the excavator to
scrape six inches of debris, plating waste, and soil from alQng the sloped hillside area.
The approximate volume of soil and debris removed for disposal on the east hillside was
190 tons.
. The impoundment area Oncluding the former pond) was then backfilled with one
foot of 6" to 9" diameter rock. The rock was leveled and graded with a bulldozer so that
no low areas were visible. Approximately 5600 tons of rock were placed as backfill.
Following backfill, the east hillside was sprayed with a -State specification grass seed
mixture to prevent erosion.
2. Disposal
The solid waste was either classified as debris contaminated with FOO6 plating
wastes for landfilling without treatment under the Hazardous Debris case-by-case capacity
variance, or as soil contaminated with FOO6 waste requiring stabilization prior to landfilling.
Approximately 1100 tons of material was disposed of at Envirosafe Services, Inc., in
Grandview, Idaho.
,
-------
The 70,000 gallons of water from the pond was disposed of at Tektronix, a treatment,
storage and disposal facility in Beaverton, Oregon.
3. Final Site Analysis
Based on the results of the confirmational samples which were taken when the XRF
samples indicated the areas were clean. the cleanup exceeded the cleanup goals. The
results of the confirmational samples are shown in Table 9. The locations of these
samples and the XRF samples are shown on Figure 7.
Following the completion of the Removal Action. EPA conducted a risk assessment
on the contaminant concentrations remaining in the surlace soils of the impoundment
area. The analysis assumed a lifetime exposure to the remaining residual contaminant
concentrations. The results are shown in Table 10 (see also Appendix B). Under the
industrial scenario. the impoundment area poses a risk of 8x10-o and a Hazard Index of
0.35. For the residential scenario. the impoundment area poses a risk of 8x10-5 and a
Hazard Index of 2.5. These numbers are extremely conservative and were calculated to
provide a worst case scenario. The actual risk likely would be much lower based on the
fact that 1) the remaining contamination is now under one or more feet of rock. thus
preventing direct exposure to it; and 2) the area fills with water, and is below the
surrounding grade, and so Mure residential or industrial use would require additional
backfilling, resulting in covering the residual contamination by an additional 5 or more feet
of backfill.
4. Deed Restriction
Followi~g the Removal Action. the site owner placed a deed restriction on the
property to prevent the use of the shallow aquifer for drinking water purposes, The deed
restriction contains the following language: .
The undersigned as owners of said tracts agree to burden the above described
real property with a restriction prohibiting the use of a well for drinking water unless
the top of the screened interval is deeper than 20'. below mean sea level, and the
water from the well is tested to ensure that it meets drinking water standards
before use. .
The required interval in the deed restriction will prevent screening of future wells in
the shallow aquifer.
XI. DETERMINATION THAT NO FURTHER ACTION IS APPROPRIATE
EPA's determination of No Further Action for the Allied Plating Site is based on the
following: .
~
37
-------
Table .9
Removal Action Confirmattonal Sampling Results
!
,
.. , .:'A4.:-"'..,:::;'~7i::;:i:~~;:i:: i~::I~Q';!:I~I:: itm~:1~jl~;;1.
Analyte 'AI
Arsenic 17.8 16.4 20.4 17 29.8 23 40.9 12 24.7 19.6 12 33.6
Cadmium 2.66 2.07 1.97 1 1.91 2.12 4.72 1 ' 3.73 2.17 0.91 3.72.
:
Chromium 76.6 76.1 2220 2010 1150 1280 . 5590 166 861 210 219 SUO
Copper 553 460 4580 3200 7300 7290 12000 876 4270 1930 318 11800
co
Lead 226 169 96.5 73.1 71.4 43.1 203 103 158 127 72.7 234. M
Nickel 912 756 1720 973 2840 2300 4960 586 2210 5410 722 2260
Antimony 3 3 14 14 4.5 6.1 36.5 3 3 3 3 37.3
-------
o 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
AA . . . .-
Flat Area
A .. . . .. . .. . . \
.
Pond
B . . . . . . . . . .
c
.
.
.
.
..
.
..
..
..
D .. . . .. . . .. .. A
Burn pit 0
("
E . . . . . .
Hillside
F . . . . .
",,'
..
G .. . .
H
.
.
.
.
.. conf irmational sample
.
~
o
SCALE
-u
.
50 FU:I'
--'
..-
... .......,.," ..-...'".
Figure 7
Removal Action
~,.rl>l>nlnn rant1 ""n..f':p.-~.I~__I "-...--"
-------
Table 10
Residual Risk for the Post Removal Impoundment Area
I
"
Milit.:..
Antimony 3 26 26
Arsenic 12 28 28
Cadmium 1 . 5 2 3 3
Chromium 76 5590 1581 13,161 5590
Copper 318 12,000 4548 21,817 12,000
Lead 43 234 , 131 190 190
Nickel 586 5410 2137 3928 3928
1 97 23 199 97
Risk Totals
0.2
0.3
0:02
0;06
1.2
0.03
7.7x10.$ 0.05 .8.2xl0~
0.003 . .
0.008
0
0.16 ~
'.
0.10
0.002
7.7x10.s 0.35 8.2xl0~
0.7
0.02
2.6
1 Minimum concentration measured in confirmation samples.
2 Maximum concentration measured in confirmation samples.
. 3 Mean concentration calculated from confirmation samples.
4 95% upper confidence limit valu~ calculated from the confirmational samples. ,
5 Exposure Point Concentration: value is either the 95% UCL value of the confirmational samples, or if the 95% UCL
-------
1) The Removal Action achieved a soil cleanup level in the impoundment area.
which left the health threat associated with site related contaminants well below a
1x10-4 excess cancer risk and a Hazard Index of 1 for the industrial scenario. EPA
expects the site usage to remain industrial in the future.
2) The results of the Remedial Investigation and Risk Assessment indicated that all
other areas of the site were below a 1x10-4 risk and below a HazardJndex of 1 for
all scenarios.
3) Site related groundwater contamination above federal drinking water standards
was present in only one well, which was contaminated with nickel. The well was in
the shallow aquifer in the vicinity of the pond. The concentration of nickel is
expected to drop now that the source of contamination has been removed (the
plating_waste). No one is currently drinking the water, and the deed restriction
should- prevent future use of the groundwater.
4) Although the manganese in the groundwater poses a potential health threat, the
contaminant is widespread in the groundwater in the area and is not related to the
historical activities at the site.
Based on EPA's Risk Assessment for the site, which shows that the Removal
Action resulted in a risk in the 10-0 range, and a Hazard Index of less than 1 for the
selected industrial scenario, EP A believes that no remedial action is necessary at this site
to protect human health and the environment. In light of EPA's decision not to select a
remedial action, the requirements of Section 121 of CERCLA including the ARARs
provisions of Section 121(d)(2) of CERCL4. are not triggered.
XII. CESSATION OF GROUt-.lDWATER MONITORING
Although nickel, a site related contaminant, was found in the groundwater beneath
the site, EPA does not plan to perform additional groundwater monitoring. This decision.
is based on the following:
0...:.-
1) The plating waste which was the source of site related contamination in the
groundwater has been removed from the site. Therefore, any remaining .Ievels of
contamination in the groundwater are expected to decrease. -
2) Only one well contained nickel above federal drinking water standards. The well
is in the shallow aquifer beneath the impoundment area. It is unlikely that this
aquifer will be used for a water supply well. The residences and businesses in the
area are on the city water supply, and the deed restriction should keep the shallow
aquifer from being used in the future. Although both the shallow aquifer and
deeper aquifer beneath the site contain concentrations ofmanganes~_abqv~ health
based levels, the. manganese is not site related~ ... .
-------
XIII. 5 YEAR REVIEW
A 5 year review will be conducted to ensure that the land use for the site remains
industrial.
XIV. EXPLANATION OF SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES
There are no differences from the preferred alternative in the Proposed Plan.
"~: .. .
..0.
.
-------
Appendix A
Responsiveness Summary
--
. ...: . ~ .
-------
I. Overview
Allied Plating Respbnsiveness Summary
The purpose of this Responsiveness Summary is to summarize and respond to
comments received during the comment period held by the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) from April 26, to May 26, 1993, regarding EPA's Proposed pian for no
further action for the Allied Plating Superfund site. The Proposed Plan was based on
information in the Remedial Investigation report prepared for the site, and on the
documented results of a Removal Action taken at the site from October 20, to November
10, 1992. These documents were made available to the public in the Administrative
Record, located in the information repositories maintained in the EPA Records Center in
Seattle, and ~t Portland State University's Miller Ubrary, and the N.E. Neighborhood
Association in Portland, Oregon. The notice of availability of these documents was
published in The Oregonian on April 29, 1993. The proposed Plan and newspaper notice
offered the option of having a pubic meeting. However, a meeting was not requested by
the public.
II. Background on Community Involvement
To date, the following community relations activities have been conducted by EPA
at the Allied Plating site:
February 1987
,
September 1987
March 1990
November 1990
June 1991
October 1991
October 1992
EPA distributed a fact sheet announcing the nomination of the site to
the National Priorities Ust.
Community Relations Plan published, which included interyiews from
the community and local officials. . ,
EP A released a fact sheet announcing the site was placed on the
National Priorities Ust.
EPA distributed a fact sheet announcing the beginning of the AI field
work.
EPA released a fact sheet, describing the preliminary results of the AI.
Community Relations Plan Schedule updated.
EPA.mailed a fact sheet announcing the beginning of the Aemoval
Action at the site.
~
-------
April 26, 1993
EPA mailed the Proposed Plan for No Further Action. In the
Proposed Plan, EPA offered the opportunity for a public meeting. No
request was made.
April 28, 1993
EP A published a newspaper notice in The Oregonian announcing the
Public Comment Period and the opportunity for a public meeting.
April 26, 1993
Public Comment Period begins.
May 26, 1993
Public Comment Period ends.
June 1993
Responsiveness Summary prepared.
III. Summary- of Public Comments and Lead Agency Response.
There were no public comments submitted during the public comment period held
from April 26 to May 26, 1993. There was no request for a public meeting, and no oral
comments were made.
-------
"
. .
Appendix B
Post Removal Risk Assessment
. ~. " .
-------
,,\I:;'..,
,f.. ~.{.
;-- ~ &0
~~~
o '"
~.
" o~
«'-1- ,\:
'AI( "00\(;.<'
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION 10
1200 Sixth Avenue
Seattle. Washington 98101
June 3, 1993
~ E C E ~ \IT ~.,. :)
Reply to
Attn. of:
ES-098
JU~ .0..4. 19SJ
MEMORANDUM
SUPERfUND Rf}~fDIAL 8:-:;\;,;C;.,
SUBJECT:
Residual Risk Calculations for Allied Plating Soil
Carol sweene~
Health and Environmental Assessment Program; ESD
.:
FROM:
TO:
Kevin Rochlin, Remedial Project Manager
Superfund Remedial Branch, HWD
The attached tables provide calculations of risk for soil
left on site after the removal.
Because a layer of gravel was emplaced following the removal
so that the contaminated soil surface is covered, there is not a
complete pathway for human exposure. . Under these current
conditions there is little exposure to this soil and therefore
little risk.' In response to your request for quantitative
evaluation of risk based on the concentrations in the residual
soil layer, calculatio~s are shown in the attached tables using
the concentration data that you provided. These exposures. and
risks would only occur if the gravel were removed or disturbed so
that the soil surface. became available for human contact.
Other assumptions inherent in the attached calculations
include the following:
"";':.
- Locations sampled are representative of the distribution of
contaminant concentrations throughout the site, and
distribution of contaminant concentrations is approximately
lognormal.
- An exposed individual moves throughout the site with an
equal chance of contacting soil with any of the
concentrations from the distribution.
- The exposed individual lives or works at the site for a
chronic time 'period and. has a'rea~onably high contact rate
and exposure frequency,., consistent;.: , ~.it;.h. reasonable maxi1num" . '..
exposures eRNE). in'; SUPerfund "S~ndard' Default Exposure:," '"
Factors (05.WER Direc.tive:" No." 928~~'6~03,"19~1) . .
.'
."
-------
Results
Table 1 shows concentrations of inorganics in soil for
twelve sampling points (data provided by you) and summary
statistics for this data set. Based on this data and assumptions
identified above, exposure point concentrations were developed
using 95% Upper confidence limit on the mean (calculated.
according to OSWER Directive No. 9285.7-081), or, if this
statistic exceeded the maximum sample, using the maximum sample
concentration. Table 2 presents EPA reference doses and cancer
potency slope factors for oral exposure to these contaminants,
exposure point concentrations, and RME risks for residential and
industrial exposure scenarios.
For the residential scenario, the highest hazard quotient
(HQ) calculated is for copper, with a result of 1.2. The HQ for
nickel is 0.7. Considering the low precision associated with
reference doses, both of these HQs could be said to equal one.
Exposures to Copper exceeding the reference dose are associated
with gastrointestinal distress, an adverse but not very severe
effect. The reference dose for nickel incorporates uncertainty
and modifying factors totaling 300, which means that the no
observed effect level is lower than the exposure calculated here
by a factor of 300. .
For the industial scenario, no non-cancer hazard quotient
exceeds 0.2.
Uncertainties in this Assessment
- The chronic RME factors do not represent short-term higher
exposures that may occur for a child with a high soil
ingestion rate. Chronic risk calculations therefore may not
be protective against effects from a contaminant such as
cyanide with potential for acute or subchronic effects.
- These risk calculations represent exposure to contaminants
through a single pathway, incidental ingestion of soil.
Other pathways of exposure, such as dermal contact or
inhalation of dust, would result in additional exposure to
an individual at the site. However,- these other pathways
are expected to contribute much less than the ingestion
pathway. The physical characteristics of the site are such
that there is little potential for generation of airborne
dust, as documented in the remedial investigation (RI)
report, and therefore little potential for inhalation of
contaminants.. Dermal absorption of inorganic contaminants
is in general expected .to be small relat~ve t~ ingestion'
exposures for soil... Therefore, ~.this single-pathway
quantitative. assessment .isbelieved to be protective of all
pathway~ of exposure. ..
-------
Different species of chromium have different toxicity, but
speciation of chromium in soil is uncertain. Reference
doses for non-cancer effects of chromium are different for
hexavalent vs. trivalent chromium. Risk calculations in
Table 2 provide an estimate assuming that most chromium in
residual contaminated soil is trivalent, with one percent of
chromium in soil hexavalent, consistent with information on
speciation provided in the RI.
- EPA has not evaluated oral carcinogenicity of chromium.
Attachments (2)
.
-------
EPA Region 10, 6/3/93
Table 1.
Allied Plating Residual Soil Contamination:
Concentrations and Summary Statistics
Che"mlcal Concentration (ma/ka) M1n Mu Mun 95UCLlo9
Arsenic 18 16 12 17 20 34 25 30 20 41 23 12 12 41 22 28
Cadmium 3 2 1 1 2 4 4 2 2 5 2 1 1 5 2, 3
Chromium" 77 76 166 2010 2220 5110 861 1150 210 5590 1280 219 76 5590 1581 13161
Copper 553 460 876 3200 4580 11800 4270 7300 1930 12000 7290 318 318 12000 4548 21817
Lead 226 169 103 73 97 234 158 71 127 203 43 73 43 234 131 190
Nickel 912 756 586 973 1720 2260 2210 2840 5410 4960 2300 722 586 5410 2137 3928
Antimony 3 3 3 14 14 37 3 5 3 37 6 3 3 37 1 1 26
Cyanide 1 1 4 7 13 19 23 55 1 1 38 97 1 1 97 23 . 199
Samele Location A1 A4 D1 A10 A7 G1 D4 C6 D7 C9 C8.A D9.A
I
I
-------
EPA Region 10, 6/3/93
Table 2.
Allied Plating Residual Risks:
Risk Calculations for Residential and Industrial Exposure to the
Contaminated Soil Layer
Toxicity Reference Values Risk Calculation Results
Cancer Potency Non.Cancer Effects Exposure
Weight of Point RESIDENTIAL \ INDUSTRIAL
Chemical ~ Evidence ~ BlQQ !J&ME Confldencf~ Concentration J:Q Bl1Is . J:g BW
ArsenIc 1.7 E+O (a) A I (b) 3.0 E.4 (c) 3 med I (b) 28 0.3 7.7 E.5 0.05 8.2 E.6
C~dmlum NA 5.0 E.4 (c) 10 high I (b) 3 0.02 0.003
ChromIum Cr III NA 1.0 E+O (c) 1000 low I (b) 5590 0.06 0.008
.. Cr. VI NA 5.0 E.3 (c) 500 low I (b) 56
Copper NA 3.7 E.2 (c) H (b) 12000 1.2 0.16
Lead NA NA 190 NA
Nickel NA 2.0 E.2 (c) 300 med I (b) 3928 0.7 0.10
Antimony NA 4.0 E.4 (c) 1000: med I. (b) 26 0.2 0.03
CyanIde NA 2.0 E.2 (c) 500 I (b) 97: 0.02 0~002
Fqotnotes:
(a) Cancer potency slope lactor lor oral exposure, /(mg/kg.day).
(b) Sources 01 toxicity data are: I = Integrated Risk Information System, EPA on.line database.
H = Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables, EPA.ECAO, 1992.
(c) Relerence dose lor oral exposure, mg/kg.day: .
-------
Appendix C
State Letter of Concurrence with the
No Further Action Decision
'-.".
-------
Appendix D
Administrative Record Index
-
'.;--
. .
-------
06/24/93
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
Page
1
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
HEADING:
1. o.
SITE IDENTIFICATION
SUB-HEAD:
1. 1.
Correspondence
- 0000014 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 03/08/78 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Stephen Carter/
ADDRESSEE: Robert S. Forman/
DESCRIPTION: Letter re: first draft of proposed pollution control system for
Allied Plating
1. 1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
1
- 0000003 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 04/18/78 PAGES:
AUTHOR: William P. Sells/
ADDRESSEE: Ernest P. Stierly/Allied Plating
DESCRIPTION: Letter regarding elimination of all potentially hazardous waste
discharges to the holding ponds adjacent to Allied Plating
1. 1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
1
- 0000004 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 04/26/78 PAGES: 1
AUTHOR: E.P. stier1y/Allied Plating
ADDRESSEE: William P. Sells/Oregon Dept. of Environmental Quality (DEQ)
DESCRIPTION: Letter stating that Mr. Stierly doesn't believe Allied Plating
is discharging hazardous waste and requesting set of guidelines
as to what DEQ considers a hazardous waste
1.1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
- 0000005 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 06/14/78 PAGES:
AUTHOR: William P. Sells/DEQ
ADDRESSEE: Ernest P. Stierly/Allied Plating
DESCRIPTION: Reply to Stierly's 4/26/78 letter listing laboratory
from samples taken from the holding pond, requesting
contact City of Portland in regards to connection to
sewer
1. 1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
1
results
stierly to
-------
06/24/93
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
Page
2
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
- 0000006 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 07/20/78 PAGES:
AUTHOR: William P. Sells/DEQ
ADDRESSEE: Ernest P. Stierly/Allied Plating
DESCRIPTION: Letter documenting outcome of 7/13/78
and DEQ
1. 1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
1
meeting between Stierly
- 0000007 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 08/01/78 PAGES: 1
AUTHOR: Rodney Lewis, Jr./McMenamin, Joseph et al
ADDRESSEE: William Sells/DEQ
DESCRIPTION: Letter confirming conversation of 7/28/89, granting Allied
Plating an extension to submit program for discharge of waste
1. 1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
- ~000008 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 09/20/78 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Robert E. Gilbert/DEQ
ADDRESSEE: Ernest P. stierly/Allied Plating
DESCRIPTION: Letter staing that stierly must submit
10/20/78
1. 1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
2
a detailed plan by
- 0000010 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 10/11/78 PAGES: 2
AUTHoR: Rodney Lewis, Jr./McMenamin, Joseph, et ale
ADDRESSEE: William Sells/DEQ
DESCRIPTION: Letter requesting a meeting to discuss compliance with DEQ
standards
1. 1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
- 0000009 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 10/18/78 PAGES: 2
AUTHOR: Rodney Lewis, Jr./McMenamin, Joseph, et ale
ADDRESSEE: William Sells/DEQ
DESCRIPTION: Letter explaining steps Allied Plating was taking to meet
compliance schedule timeline
1.1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
-------
06/24/93
u. S. Environmental Prote9tion Agency, Region 10
Page
3
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
1. 1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
- 0000011 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 11/18/78 PAGES: 1
AUTHOR: Patrick Raney/Testing Laboratory
ADDRESSEE: Allied Plating/
DESCRIPTION: Cover memo for results of sampling
1. 1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
- 0000012 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 11/~/78 PAGES:
AUTHOR: William P. Sells/DEQ
ADDRESSEE: Rodney Lewis, Jr./Attorney at Law
DESCRIPTION: Letter agreeing to an extension of
schedule
1
time to submit compliance
1.1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
- 0000013 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 12/04/78 PAGES: 2
AUTHOR: Rodney Lewis, Jr./McMenamin,
ADDRESSEE: William Sells/DEQ
DESCRIPTION: Letter regarding compliance
Joseph, et al.
schedule
1. 1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
- 0000015 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 02/01/79 PAGES:
AUTHOR: William P. Sells/DEQ
ADDRESSEE: Rodney Lewis, Jr./
DESCRIPTION: Letter confirming receipt of
schedule
1
12/4/78 letter outlining compliance
1.1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
- 0000016 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 06/14/79 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Bob Forman/
ADDRESSEE: Bill Sells/DEQ
DESCRIPTION: Cover letter for
2
proposed system at Allied Plating
1. 1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
- 0000017 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 10/10/79 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Fred Bromfeld/DEQ
ADDRESSEE: 1
DESCRIPTION: Status of enforcement action taken by Northwest Region at Allied
Plating
-------
06/24/93
u. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
Page
4
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
1.1.
- 0000018 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 12/19/80 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Robert E. Gilbert/DEQ
ADDRESSEE: Ernest P. Stierly/Allied Plating
DESCRIPTION: Cover letter for application for
Facilities Permit
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
1
Water Pollution Control
1. 1.
- 0000019 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 03/02/81 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Robert E. Gilbert/DEO
ADDRESSEE: Ernest P. stierly/Allied Plating
DESCRIPTION: Letter requesting additional information
Control Facilities Permit
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
1
for Water Pollution
1.1.
- 0000020 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 03/06/81 PAGES: 1
AUTHOR: E.P. Stierly/Allied Plating
ADDRESSEE: Gentlemen/Allied Plating
DESCRIPTION: Letter re: waste lagoon
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
1.1.
- 0000021 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 03/06/81 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Kenneth D. Feigner/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Ernest P. Stierly/Allied Plating
DESCRIPTION: Letter stating that Mr. Stier~y must determine whether
exhibitis any of characteristics of hazardous waste as
in the CFR
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
2
waste
defined
- 0000022 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 07/02/81 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Robert E. Gilbert/DEO
ADDRESSEE: Ernest P. Stierly/Allied Plating
DESCRIPTION: Letter noting that if Allied Plating fails to sub~it information
immediately, the DEO will initiate enforcement action
1. 1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
-------
06/24/93
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
Page
5
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
1.1.
- 0000023 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 07/29/81 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Linda Dawson/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Ernest P. Stierly/Allied Plating
DESCRIPTION: Letter returning hazardous waste
correction
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
1
permit application for
1.1.
- 0000024 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 08/17/81 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Charles H. Gray/DEQ
ADDRESSEE: Ernest P. Stierly/Allied Plating
DESCRIPTION: Letter advising that failure to comply
information could result in imposition
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
1
with request for
of civil penalties
1.1.
- 0000025 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 02/05/82 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Charles Clinton/DEQ
ADDRESSEE: Ernest P. Stierly/Allied Plating
DESCRIPTION: Letter noting two options available
from Allied Plating
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
2
for disposal of wastewater
1. 1.
- 0000026 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 02/23/82 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Ernest P. Stierly/Allied
ADDRESSEE: Charles R. Clinton/DEQ
DESCRIPTION: Letter choosing option 1
Frame Begins
1. Ends
1
1
Plating
from Clinton's 2/5/82 letter
1.1.
- 0000027 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 07/13/82 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Charles R. Clinton/DEQ
ADDRESSEE: Don Johnson/Allied Plating
DESCRIPTION: Letter re: groundwater monitoring
5
Frame Be.gins
1
Ends
1
- 0000028 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 10/17/83 . PAGES:
AUTHOR: Charles Clinton/DEQ
ADDRESSEE: Ernest P. Stierly/Allied Plating
DESCRIPTION: Letter stating that if changes are made to the
a new permit application shall be submitted
1. 1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
1
-------
06/24/93
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
Page
6
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
1. 1.
- 0000001 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 11/04/83 PAGES:
AUTHOR: C.R. Clinton/
ADDRESSEE: File/
DESCRIPTION: Chronology 1973 - 1983
Frame Begins
o
Ends
o
2
- 0000029 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 11164/83 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Charles R. Clinton/DEQ
ADDRESSEE: Folger Johnson/U.S. Bankruptcy Court
DESCRIPTION: Letter stating that DEQ would like to see that paying of
consultants drill monitoring report be made a high priority
1.1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
1
1.1.
- 0000030 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 05/07/84 PAGES:
AUTHOR: C. R. Clinton/DEQ
ADDRESSEE: File/
DESCRIPTION: Update on status of Allied Plating
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
2
1.1.
- 0000031 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 05/31/84 PAGES: 3
AUTHOR: V. Joe Poor/Pacific Metal Finishers, Inc.
ADDRESSEE: Fred BOlton/DEQ
DESCRIPTION: Letter stating that residue from Allied Plating may be
contaminated
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
1.1.
- 0000032 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 07/05/84 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Charles E. Findley/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Fred Hansen/DEQ
DESCRIPTION: Letter requesting that DEQ conduct a thorough investigation at
Allied Plating
4
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
- 0000033 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 08/01/84 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Fred Hansen/DEQ
ADDRESSEE: Charles E. Findley/EPA -.
DESCRIPTION: Letter stating that inspection of Allied.Plating has
no violation of hazardous waste regulations
1.1.
1
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
-------
06/24/93
u. S. Environmental Prote~tion Agency, Region 10
Page
7
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
1. 1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
- 0000034 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 08/08/84 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Charles R. Clinton/DEQ
ADDRESSEE: V. Joe poor/Pacific Metal
DESCRIPTION: Letter sharing results of
1
Finishers, Inc.
sampling done at Allied Plating
1. 1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
- 0000035 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 09/r7/84 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Charles E. Findley/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Stan HOdes/Transmission Exchange Company
DESCRIPTION: Letter requesting Part B application
3
1. 1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
- 0000036 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 10/01/84 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Stan Hodes/
ADDRESSEE: Charles E. Findley/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Letter stating Mr. Hodes' position
site
2
as owner of Allied plating
1. 1.
Frame.Begins
1
Ends
1
- 0000037 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 10/31/84 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Charles Findley/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Stan Hodes/Transmission
DESCRIPTION: Letter stating that EPA
4
Exchange Co.
cannot retract request for Part B
1. 1.
Frame Begins
o
Ends
o.
- 0000002 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 11/07/84 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Fred Wolf/EPA
ADDRESSEE: George Hofer/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Report of observations and recommendations
Plating facility visited on 11/5/84
1
concerning the Allied
1. 1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
- 0000038 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 11/26/84 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Paul Day/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Bill Kor3ak/city of Portland
DESCRIPTION: Record of Communication re: Storm
2
-------
06/24/93
u. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
Page
8
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
1. 1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
- 0000039 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 12/03/84 PAGES: 6
AUTHOR: H. Philip Eder/Eder & Schmidt
ADDRESSEE: Paul Day/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Letter transmitting questions from Stan Hodes
1.1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
- 0000040 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 12/1~/84 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Janet O'Hara/EPA
ADDRESSEE: H. Philip Eder/Eder & Schmidt
DESCRIPTION: Letter answering questions in Mr.
2
Eder's 12/3/84 letter
1. 1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
- 0000041 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 12/20/84 PAGES: 2
AUTHOR: H. Philip Eder/Eder & Schmidt
ADDRESSEE: Janet O'Hara/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Letter stating that if the law requires Mr. Hodes to clean up
the material left upon his land then he is resigned to that fact
1. 1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
- 0000042 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 01/10/85 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Charles E. Findley/EPA
ADDRESSEE: H. Philip Eder/Eder & Schmidt
DESCRIPTION: Letter advising that due date
2
for Part B application
- 0000043 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 01/17/85 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Ernest A. schmidt/DEQ
ADDRESSEE: H.S. Coulter/Oregon Dept. of Transportation
DESCRIPTION: Letter request ion Dept. to submit documentation indicating
whether they have any owndership in the Allied Plating facility
2
Frame Begins
'.
1
Ends
1
1. 1.
- 0000044 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 02/18/85 PAGES: 1
AUTHOR: Bryan M. JOhnson/Seton, Johnson & Odell
ADDRESSEE: Janet O'Hara/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Letter stating that Seton, Johnson & Odell has been retained by
Stan Hodes and requesting all technical i,nformation"'that EPA has
1. 1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
-------
06/24/93
u. S. Environmental Prote~tion Agency, Region 10
Page
9
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
1. 1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
- 0000045 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 02/22/85 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Janet B. O'Hara/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Bryan M. Johnson/Seton, Johnson & Odell
DESCRIPTION: Cover letter for technical information
2
1.1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
- 0000046 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 04/03/85 PAGES: 2
AUTHOR: Bryan M. Johnson/Seton, Johnson
ADDRESSEE: Harry Edmonds/City of Portland
DESCRIPTION: Letter regarding procedures for
sewer
& Odell
connecting to the city sanitary
1. 1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
- 0000047 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 06/04/85 PAGES: 1
AUTHOR: Bryan M. JOhnson/Seton, Johnson & Odell
ADDRESSEE: Janet O'Hara/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Letter stating that Seton, Johnson & Odell is no longer
retained by Stan Hodes on the Allied Plating project
being
1. 1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
- 0000048 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 06/07/85 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Janet Baker O'Hara/EPA
ADDRESSEE: stanley HOdes/Transmission
DESCRIPTION: Cover letter for data sent
1
Exchange Co.
1.1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
- 0000049 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 06/20/85 PAGES: 1
AUTHOR: Thomas E. Bottenberg/City of Portland
ADDRESSEE: Stan Hodes/
DESCRIPTION: Letter confirming City's position regarding the pumping of the
Allied Plating pond
1.1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
- 0000050 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 07/09/85 PAGES:
AUTHOR: George C. Hofer/RCRA
ADDRESSEE: stanley Hodes/Transmission Exchange Co.
DESCRIPTION: Letter requesting information to be. supplied on the..potential
for the public to be exposed to hazardous wastes through
releases at Allied Plating
-------
06/24/93
U. S. Environmental Prot~ction Agency, Region 10
Page
10
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
1. 1.
- 0000052 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 07/17/85 PAGES: 2
AUTHOR: Clyde Carlson/Consulting civil Engineer
ADDRESSEE: Stanley HOdes/Transmission Exchange Co.
DESCRIPTION: Brief summary of Mr. Carlson's thoughts relative
of the hazardous site occupied by Allied Plating
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
to the closure
- 0~00053 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 08/07/85 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Charles E. Findley/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Owner/Operator/Allied Plating Inc.
DESCRIPTION: Requirements due to amended interim
facilities
1.1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
5
status land disposal
- 0000054 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 08/15/85 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Stan Hodes/
ADDRESSEE: Laura Hamilton/DEQ
DESCRIPTION: Letter advising DEQ of reason for Hodes
"completeness review dated 5/24/85"
1.1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
3
delaying answer to the
- 0000055 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 10/31/85 PAGES: 3
AUTHOR: J. B. Boyd/Oregon Dept. of Transportation
ADDRESSEE: Charles E. Findley/EPA .
DESCRIPTION: Cover letter and attached sketch map of the fencing plan for
security at the Allied Plating s~~e
1. 1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
- 0000056 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 01/27/86 PAGES: 2
AUTHOR: Terrence E. Beleunes/Century Environmental Services
ADDRESSEE: Tom Bottenburg/city of Portland
DESCRIPTION: Letter re: closure of hazardous waste impoundment at
Plating
1.1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
Allied
-------
06/24/93
u. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
Page
11
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
- 0000057 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 02/04/86 PAGES: 1
AUTHOR: Harry G. Edmonds/City of Portland
ADDRESSEE: Terrence E. Beleunes/Century Environmental Sciences
DESCRIPTION: Letter denying request to pump Allied Plating pond into
of Portland sanitary sewer system
1. 1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
the City
- 00Q0058 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 02/18/86 PAGES:
AUTHOR: J. B.Boyd/DOT
ADDRESSEE: Charles E. Findley/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Letter transmitting rough
1.1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
1
draft prepared by Reidel Environmental
- 0000059 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 03/20/86 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Laura Hamilton/DEQ
ADDRESSEE: George Toombs/Oregon State Health Division
DESCRIPTION: Letter forwarding data from the Allied Plating
assistance in interpreting the data
1.1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
2
site, requesting
- 0000060 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 05/07/86 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Fred Hansen/DEQ
ADDRESSEE: Larry Rulien/DOT
DESCRIPTION: Letter requesting meeting
1. 1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
1
- 0000061 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 05/15/86 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Janet O'Hara/EPA
ADDRESSEE: File/
DESCRIPTION: Summary of 5/12/86 Allied
1. 1.
. Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
1
Plating Meeting
1.1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
- 0000051 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 07/13/86 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Charles E. Findley/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Stanley HOdes/Transmission Exchange Co.
DESCRIPTION: Letter stating that all available information has
to Hodes' consulting engineers
2
-------
06/24/93
u. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
Page
12
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
1. 1. - 0000062 Microfilm Reel Frame Begins 1 Ends 1
DATE: 01/20/87 PAGES: 2
AUTHOR: Michael Watson/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Joan Shafer/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Overview of data from Allied Plating
1. 1. Microfilm Reel Frame Begins 1 Ends 1
PAGES: 15
- 0000063
DATE: 01/7.-7/87
AUTHOR: Stan Hodes/
ADDRESSEE: Ernesta Barnes/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Letter pointing out
errors in EPA's 1/22/87 press release
1. 1. - 0000064 Microfilm Reel Frame Begins 1 Ends 1
DATE: 02/20/87 PAGES: 1
AUTHOR: Robie G. Russell/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Stan Hodes/
DESCRIPTION: Reply to Stan Hodes letter of 1/27/87
1. 1. - 0000065 Microfilm Reel Frame Begins 1 Ends 1
DATE: 03/02/87 PAGES: 2
AUTHOR: Stan Hodes/
ADDRESSEE: Robie G. Russell/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Replay to Robie Russell's 2/20/87 letter
1.1.
- 0000066 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 03/04/87 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Stan Hodes/
ADDRESSEE: Fred Hansen/DEQ
DESCRIPTION: Letter commenting on inspection
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
1
report dated 1/7/87
- 0000067 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 03/04/87 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Stan Hodes/
ADDRESSEE: Robie G. Russell/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Letter commenting on
1. 1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
1
-------
06/24/93
u. S. Environmental Prote~tion Agency, Region 10
Page
13
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
1. 1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
- 0000068 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 03/09/87 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Stan Hodes/
ADDRESSEE: Russell H. Wyer/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Letter stating that data generated by the Oregon DOT and DEQ
replaces old data and should be made a part of the record
1
1.1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
- 0000069 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 03/11/87 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Stan Hodes/
ADDRESSEE: Janet O'Hara/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Letter expressing interest in knowing
firm CH2MHill contracting with EPA to
1
more about engineering
work on Allied Plating
1.1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
- 0000070 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 03/12/87 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Stan Hodes/
ADDRESSEE: Russell H. Wyer/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Letter commenting on inspection
3
report of 1/7/86
1.1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
- 0000071 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 03/13/87 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Fred Hansen/DEQ
ADDRESSEE: Stan Hodes/
DESCRIPTION: Reply to Mr. Hodes 3/4/87
2
le~ter concerning inspection report
1.1.
. Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
- 0000072 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 04/02/87 PAGES:
AUTHOR: stan Hodes/
ADDRESSEE: Fred Hansen/DEQ
DESCRIPTION: Response to Mr. Hansen's
inspection report
1
3/13/87 letter concerning the
1.1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
- 0000073 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 04i27/87 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Terrence Beleunes/
ADDRESSEE: Phil Wong/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Letter stating century West's involvement with
Plating site, stressing that data released was
final QA/QC audit
2
the "Allied
-------
06/24/93
u. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
Page
14
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
1. 1.
- 0000074 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 05/01/87 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Philip Wong/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Terrence Belunes/Century
DESCRIPTION: Response to Mr. Belunes'
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
1
West Engineering
letter of 4/27/87
1. 1.
- 0000075 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 05f26/87 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Fred Hansen/DEQ
ADDRESSEE: Stan Hodes/
DESCRIPTION: Letter attempting to clarify Mr. Hodes' understanding of how
environmental protection programs work and his responsibilities
as a property owner
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
1
1. 1.
- 0000076 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 06/03/87 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Stan Hodes/
ADDRESSEE: Robie G. Russell/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Letter stating that Mr. Hodes' permission will be required
before CH2MHill contractors will be allowed to enter the Allied
Plating site, and stating other conditions that must be adhered
to
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
1
1.1.
- 0000077 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 06/16/87 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Stan Hodes/
ADDRESSEE: Fred Hansen/DEQ
DESCRIPTION: Letter discussing Mr. Hodes acceptance
hazardous waste at Allied Plating site
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
3
of responsibility for
1. 1.
- 0000078 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 07/16/87 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Thomas Miller/DEQ
ADDRESSEE: Phil Wong/DEQ
DESCRIPTION: Cover letter for "Groundwater Elevation Data",
observations made on 7/14/87 visit to site
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
2
-------
06/24/93
u. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
Page
15
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
- 0000079 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 07/17/87 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Tom Miller/DEQ
ADDRESSEE: Stanley HOdes/Transmission Exchange Co.
DESCRIPTION: Cover letter for groundwater water level measurements, stating
observations made on 7/14/87 site visit, and expressing concern
about potential worker exposure
1. 1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
2
- 0000080 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 07/17/87 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Edward G. Woods/DEQ
ADDRESSEE: stan HOdes/Transmission Exchange
DESCRIPTION: Letter giving additional direction as to what activities are
allowed at the site prior to finalizing the Superfund cleanup
1.1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
2
- 0000081 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 11/10/87 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Tom Miller/DEQ
ADDRESSEE: Phil Wong/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Letter requesting information
Responsible Parties (PRPs) at
1. 1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
1
that EPA may have on potentially
the Allied Plating site
- 0000082 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 02/05/88 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Philip Millam/EPA
ADDRESSEE: C. Scott Parish/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Memorandum re: Allied Plating NP~/RCRA Eligibility
1.1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
4
- 0000083 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 03/15/89 PAGES: 12
AUTHOR: Bruce Long/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Chuck Shenk/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Memorandum re: Closure and
Plating, Portland, Oregon
1. 1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
-------
06/24/93
u. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
Page
16
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
- 0000084 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 11/15/89 PAGES:
AUTHOR: stan Hodes/
ADDRESSEE: Philip Millam/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Letter requesting
attorney in 9/87
1.1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
2
EPA to reconsider offer made by Mr. Hodes
- 0000085 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 11/16/89 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Stan Hodes/
ADDRESSEE: Philip Millam/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Letter requesting that EPA keep Mr.
issues regarding the Allied Plating
1.1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
2
Hodes better informed of
site
- 0000086 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 12/04/89 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Stan Hodes/
ADDRESSEE: Philip G. Millam/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Letter explaining why
fraudulent
1. 1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
3
the "Preliminary Health Assessment" is
- 0000087 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 12/14/89 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Philip Millam/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Stan Hodes/
DESCRIPTION: Letter explaining that EPA cannot accept Mr. Hodes offer
settlement, and updating him on the status of the Allied
site
1.1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
2
for
Plating
- 0000088 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 12/22/89 PAGES: 16
AUTHOR: Stan Hodes/
ADDRESSEE: Philip Millam/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Letter commenting on issues
1.1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
-------
06/24/93
u. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
Page
17
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
1. 1. - 0000089 Microfilm Reel Frame Begins 1 Ends 1
DATE: 01/10/90 PAGES: 1
AUTHOR: Kevin Rochlin/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Stan Hodes/
DESCRIPTION: Cover letter for RI/FS scoping Report
1. 1. - 0000090 Microfilm Reed Frame Begins 1 Ends 1
DATE: 08/67/90 PAGES: 3
AUTHOR: Stan Hodes/
ADDRESSEE: Kevin Rochlin/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Letter making observations and comments about Allied Plating
1. 1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
- 0000091 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 09/28/90 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Stan Hodes/
ADDRESSEE: Kevin Rochlin/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Letter re: Money being wasted on current
plans for the Allied Plating site
2
studies and future
1. 1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
- 0000092 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 10/02/90 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Stan Hodes/
ADDRESSEE: Kevin Rochlin/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Letter requesting copy of
Natural Resource survey"
2
"Health Assessment" and "Preliminary
SUB-HEAD:
1. 2.
Background - RCRA and Other Information
1. 2.
Microfilm Reel
PAGES:
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
- 0000014
DATE: 07/12/78
AUTHOR: DEQ/
ADDRESSEE: /
DESCRIPTION: Pollution
1
Complaint made by Bob Purdy, OSHA
1. 2.
Microfilm Reel
PAGES:
Frame Begins
o
Ends
o
- 0000001
DATE: 08/20/79
AUTHOR: EPAI
ADDRESSEE: 1
DESCRIPTION: Inventory
1
-------
06/24/93
u. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
Page
18
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
1. 2.
- 0000002 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 10/01/79 PAGES: 13
AUTHOR: Oregon Dept. of Environmental
ADDRESSEE: /
DESCRIPTION: Enforcement Referral
Frame Begins
o
Ends
o
Quality (DEQ)/
1. 2.
Microfilm Reel
PAGES:
Frame Begins
o
Ends
o
- 0000003
DATE: 11f29/79
AUTHOR: EPA/
ADDRESSEE: /
DESCRIPTION: Potential
1
Hazardous Waste site Log
1. 2.
- 0000004 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 05/06/80 PAGES:
AUTHOR: EPA/
ADDRESSEE: /
DESCRIPTION: Hazardous Waste
Requirements
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
2
site Evaluation of Section 311 Cleanup
1. 2.
- 0000005 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 12/19/80 PAGES: 16
AUTHOR: Lloyd A. Reed/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Ernest P. Stiely/Allied Plating
DESCRIPTION: RCRA Notification Letter
Frame Begins
o
Ends
o
1. 2.
Microfilm Reel
PAGES: 1
Stierly/Allied Plating
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
- 0000011
DATE: 12/29/80
AUTHOR: Ernest P.
ADDRESSEE: /
DESCRIPTION: Application for a Water Pollution
Control Facilities Permit
1. 2.
Microfilm Reel
PAGES:
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
- 0000012
DATE: OS/21/81
AUTHOR: /DEQ
ADDRESSEE: /
DESCRIPTION: Polution
1
-------
06/24/93
u. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
Page
19
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
1. 2. - 0000013 Microfilm Reel Frame Begins 1 Ends 1
DATE: 04/02/82 PAGES: 4
AUTHOR: DEQ/
ADDRESSEE: /
DESCRIPTION: Water Pollution Control Facilities Permit
1. 2. - 0000006 Microfilm Reel Frame Begins 0 Ends 0
DATE: 02/~2/83 PAGES: 3
AUTHOR: EPA/
ADDRESSEE: /
DESCRIPTION: File Review
Checklist
- 0000007 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 11/21/84 PAGES: 17
AUTHOR: Paul Day/EPA
ADDRESSEE: George Hofer/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Allied Plating, RCRA
Meeting, November 5,
1. 2.
Frame Begins
o
Ends
o
Inspection and Part B Pre-Application
1984
1. 2. - 0000008 Microfilm Reel Frame Begins 0 Ends 0
DATE: 12/13/84 PAGES: 2
AUTHOR: DEQ/
ADDRESSEE: Stanley Hodes, Shirley Hodes/
DESCRIPTION: Notice of violation and Intent to Assess civil Penalty
- 0000009 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 03/26/85 PAGES: 3
AUTHOR: Seton, Johnson & Odell Inc./
ADDRESSEE: Stan Hodesl
DESCRIPTION: Allied Plating site Part B Permit Application
Hazardous Waste Surface Impoundment
1. 2.
Frame Begins
o
Ends
o
to'Close Abandoned
- 0000010 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 09/18/85 PAGES: 85
AUTHOR: Laura Hamilton/DEQ
ADDRESSEE: Stan Hodes/
DESCRIPTION: Letter stating DEQ's decision to evaluate exposure information
from Mr. Hodes and Oregon Dept. of Transportation .'
1. 2.
Frame Begins
o
Ends
-------
06/24/93-
u. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
Page
20
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
SUB-HEAD:
1. 3.
Notification/Site Inspection/CERCLIS
1. 3.
Microfilm Reel
PAGES:
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
- 0000002
DATE: / /
AUTHOR: EPA/
ADDRESSEE: /
DESCRIPTION: Surface
Report)
1
Impoundments Site Inspection Report (Supplemental
- 0000001 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 04/24/81 PAGES:
AUTHOR: EPAI
ADDRESSEE: 1
DESCRIPTION: Form 1 General Information
1. 3.
Frame Begins
o
Ends
o
8
- 0000003 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 11/14/85 PAGES: 7
AUTHOR: Neil Mullane, Laura Hamilton/DEQ
ADDRESSEE: 1
DESCRIPTION: Inspection Report for Allied Plating conducted on 11/14/85
1. 3.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
SUB-HEAD:
1. 4.
Preliminary Assessment (PA) Report
Microfilm Reel Frame Begins 0 Ends 0
PAGES: 1
Hazardous Waste Site Ten~~tive- Disposition
Microfilm Reel Frame Begins 1 Ends 1
PAGES: 5
1. 4.
- 0000002
DATE: 05/30/80
AUTHOR: EPA/
ADDRESSEE: 1
DESCRIPTION: Potential
1. 4.
- 0000003
DATE: 04/19/82
AUTHOR: IEPA
ADDRESSEE: /
DESCRIPTION: Potential
-------
06/24/93
u. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
Page
21
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
1. 4.
- 0000001 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 07/01/89 PAGES:
AUTHOR: EPA/
ADDRESSEE: /
DESCRIPTION: Potential Hazardous
Assessment
Frame Begins
o
Ends
o
1
Waste site Identification and Preliminary
SUB-HEAD:
1. 5.
Site Investigation
Microfilm Reel Frame Begins 0 Ends 0
PAGES: 13
Hazardous Waste Site Inspection Report
Microfilm Reel Frame Begins 0 Ends 0
PAGES: 10
Hazardous Waste Site Inspection Report
Microfilm Reel Frame Begins 0 Ends 0
PAGES: 10
Report
1. 5.
- 0000001
DATE: 04/23/82
AUTHOR: EPA/
ADDRESSEE: /
DESCRIPTION: Potential
1. 5.
- 0000002
DATE: 08/26/82
AUTHOR: EPA/
ADDRESSEE: /
DESCRIPTION: Potential
1. 5.
- 0000003
DATE: 01/07/87
AUTHOR: /
ADDRESSEE: /
DESCRIPTION: Inspection
1. 5.
"
Frame Begins
o
Ends
o
- 0000004 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 02/26/87 PAGES: 12
AUTHOR: Laura Hamilton/DEQ
ADDRESSEE: Chuck Rice/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Cover letter and accompanying
RCRA Site Inspection Report
SUB-HEAD:
1. 6.
-------
06/24/93
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
Page
22
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
1. 6.
- 0000002 Microfilm Reel
DATE: / / PAGES: 88
AUTHOR: /
ADDRESSEE: /
DESCRIPTION: Ground water sampling data
1. 6.
- 0000003 Microfilm Reel
DATE: / / PAGES:
AUTHOR: DEQj
ADDRESSEE: /
DESCRIPTION: Various data submitted by DEQ
6
1. 6.
- 0000004 Microfilm Reel
DATE: / / PAGES: 37
AUTHOR: /
ADDRESSEE: /
DESCRIPTION: Water Well Reports/Data
1. 6.
- 0000009 Microfilm Reel ABEIOO
D~TE: / / PAGES: 1
AUTHOR: /
ADDRESSEE: /
DESCRIPTION: Allied Plating Water Samples
1. 6.
- 0000010 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 08/15/78 PAGES:
AUTHOR: IDEQ
ADDRESSEE: I
DESCRIPTION: Special Survey Data Sheet,
Laboratory Data Sheet
9
Frame Begins
Frame Begins
Frame Begins
Frame Begins
Frame Begins
o
Ends
o
o
Ends
o
o
Ends
o
1
Ends
1
1
Ends
1
Field Laboratory Analysis Report,
1. 6.
- 0000005 Microfilm Reel ABE100
DATE: 03/04/81 PAGES: 1
AUTHOR: Nilda Lum/Weyerhaeuser Laboratory
ADDRESSEE: I
DESCRIPTION: Inorganic Regional Data Assessment
Frame Begins
- Soil Sample
1
Ends
1
-------
06/24/93
u. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
1. 6.
- 0000012 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 08/20/81 PAGES: 1
AUTHOR: C. L. Chang/Aqua Tech Laboratory
ADDRESSEE: Allied Plating/
DESCRIPTION: Chemical analysis of plating wastewater,
7/24/81
Frame Begins
Page
23
1
Ends
1
sample collection
- 0000011 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 01/+2/82 PAGES:
AUTHOR: DEQ/
ADDRESSEE: /
DESCRIPTION: Ground Water Quality Sample Collection Form
1. 6.
Frame Begins
1
- 0000001 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 02/01/85 PAGES: 91
AUTHOR: Ecology and Environment (E
ADDRESSEE: /
DESCRIPTION: Soil and Water Samping Data
1. 6.
Frame Begins
& E)/
1. 6.
- 0000006 Microfilm Reel ABE100 Frame Begins
DATE: 08/27/86 PAGES: 1
AUTHOR: George L. Toombs/Oregon Dept. of Human Resources
ADDRESSEE: Laura Hamilton/Oregon Dept. of Environmental Quality
DESCRIPTION: Results of groundwater collected 4/28-30/86
- 0000007 Microfilm Reel ABE100 Frame Begins
DATE: 06/03/87 PAGES: 14
AUTHOR: Stan Hodes/
ADDRESSEE: Russel H. Wyer/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Cover letter and enclosed water quality data summary
1. 6.
- 0000008 Microfilm Reel ABE100 Frame Begins
DATE: 04/26/90 PAGES: 10
AUTHOR: /
ADDRESSEE: /
DESCRIPTION: List of samples shipped and analyses
1. 6.
1
Ends
1
o
Ends
o
1
Ends
1
1
Ends
1
1
,Ends
-------
06/24/93
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
SUB-HEAD:
1. 7.
1. 7.
Century West Engineering Report
- 0000001 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 09/04/87 PAGES: 25
AUTHOR: Century West Engineering Corp./
ADDRESSEE: /
DESCRIPTION: Description of the Current Situation: Summary Report
SUB-HEAD:
1. 7. 1.
-
1. 7. 1. - 0000001
DATE: / /
AUTHOR: Century West
ADDRESSEE: /
DESCRIPTION: Appendix B -
Frame Begins
Appendices
Microfilm Reel
PAGES: 36
Engineering/
Frame Begins
Remedial Investigation Boring Logs
1. 7. 1. - 0000002
DATE: / /
AUTHOR: Century West
ADDRESSEE: /
DESCRIPTION: Appendix C - APSI Sampling Plan
1. 7. 1. - 0000003
DATE: / /
AUTHOR: Century West
ADDRESSEE: /
DESCRIPTION: Appendix D -
Microfilm Reel
PAGES: 87
Engineering/
Frame Begins
Microfilm Reel
PAGES: 63
Engineering/
Frame Begins
Previous Lab Analysis
1. 7. 1. - 0000004
DATE: / /
AUTHOR: Century West
ADDRESSEE: /
DESCRIPTION: Appendix E - Results of Laboratory Analysis
1. 7. 1. - 0000005
DATE: / /
AUTHOR: Century West
ADDRESSEE: /
DESCRIPTION: Appendix F -
Microfilm Reel
PAGES: 184
Engineering/
Frame Begins
Microfilm Reel
PAGES: 0
Engineering/
Analytical Laboratory QA/QC Procedures.
Frame Begins
Page
24
o
Ends
o
o
Ends
o
o
Ends
o
o
Ends
o
o
Ends
o
o
Ends
-------
06/24/93
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
Page
25
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
1. 7. 1. - 0000006
DATE: / /
AUTHOR: Century West
ADDRESSEE: /
DESCRIPTION: Appendix G -
Microfilm Reel
PAGES: 14
Engineering/
APSI - Monitoring Well Construction Diagrams
Frame Begins
o
Ends
o
1. 7. 1. - 0000007
DATE: / /
AUTHOR: Century West
ADDRESSEE: / -
DESCRIPTION: Appendix H -
Microfilm Reel
PAGES: 15
Engineering/
APSI Monitoring Wells Rising Head Test Results
Frame Begins
o
Ends
o
1. 7. 1. - 0000008
DATE: / /
AUTHOR: Century West
ADDRESSEE: /
DESCRIPTION: Appendix I - APSI Field Data Logs
Microfilm Reel
PAGES: 22
Engineering/
Frame Begins
o
Ends
o
1. 7. 1. - 0000009
DATE: / /
AUTHOR: Century West
ADDRESSEE: /
DESCRIPTION: Appendix J -
Microfilm Reel
PAGES: 58
Engineering/
APSI Closure Design Calculations
Frame Begins
o
Ends
o
1. 7. 1. - 0000010
DATE: / /
AUTHOR: Century West
ADDRESSEE: /
DESCRIPTION: Appendix K -
Microfilm Reel
PAGES: 11
Engineering/
APSI Post Closure Ground Water Monitoring Programs
Frame Begins
o
Ends
o
SUB-HEAD:
1. 8.
Comprehensive Groundwater Monitoring Program
Evaluation
1. 8.
- 0000001 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 04/28/86 PAGES: 152
AUTHOR: DEQ/
ADDRESSEE: EPA/
DESCRIPTION: Comprehensive Groundwater Monitoring
Inspection, Allied Plating Hazardous
conducted 4/28-30/86
Frame Begins
o
Ends
o
Program Evaluation
-------
06/24/93
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
SUB-HEAD:
1. 9.
Closure/post-closure Plan
1. 9.
- 0000001 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 01/27/86 PAGES: 114
AUTHOR: Century Environmental Services/
ADDRESSEE: Reidel Environmental Services/
DESCRIPTION: Closure/Post-Closure Plans, Allied
Frame Begins
Plating Site
Page
26
o
Ends
-------
06/24/93
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
Page
2
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
HEADING:
2. O.
REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/FEASIBILITY STUDY
SUB-HEAD:
2. 1.
Correspondence
2. 1.
- 0000023 Microfilm Reel 1
DATE: / / PAGES: 1
AUTHOR: Kevin Rochlin/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Bob Banbickle/Dept. of Transportation
DESCRIPTION: Cover letter for information sent [Copy
attached tooriginal]
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
of revised Workplan
2. 1.
- 0000001 Microfilm Reel 1
DATE: 01/25/90 PAGES: 1
AUTHOR: Edward J. Kowalski/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Lucinda Moyano/Oregon Attorney
DESCRIPTION: Cover letter for RI/FS Scoping
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
General's Office
Report
2. 1.
- 0000002 Microfilm Reel 1
DATE: 03/07/90 PAGES: 2
AUTHOR: Kevin Rochlin/EPA
ADDRESSEE: stan Hodes/
DESCRIPTION: Cover letter and attached postal receipt for RI/FS Scoping
report
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
2. 1.
- 0000003 Microfilm Reel 1
DATE: 09/26/90 PAGES: 1
AUTHOR: Kevin Rochlin/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Stan Hodes/
DESCRIPTION: Letter appraising Mr. Hodes of c~rrent travel situation
affecting EPA
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
2. 1.
- 0000004 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 12/10/90 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Stanley Hodes/
ADDRESSEE: Kevin Rochlin/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Letter requesting copies
Workplan Attachments
1
3
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
-------
06/24/93
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
Page
28
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
2. 1.
- 0000005 Microfilm Reel 1
DATE: 12/27/90 PAGES: 1
AUTHOR: Dan Saltzman/Enviromental Management Solutions (EMS)
ADDRESSEE: Kevin L. Rochlin/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Letter formally notifying EPA that EMS will be serving as
technical advisors to Stan Hodes
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
2. 1.
- 0000006 Microfilm Reel 1
DATE: 01/03/91 PAGES: 2
AUTHOR: Ke~in Rochlin/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Filel
DESCRIPTION: Memorandum re: Use of Specific
Plating Superfund site RIIFS
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
Leaching Tests During the Allied
2. 1.
- 0000007 Microfilm Reel 1
DATE: 01/22/91 PAGES: 2
AUTHOR: Terry L. Steinborn/URS Consultants
ADDRESSEE: Kevin Rochlin/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Letter re: Filtration of Groundwater
site
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
Samples at Allied Plating
2. 1.
- 0000008 Microfilm Reel 1
DATE: 02/08/91 PAGES: 1
AUTHOR: Terry L. Steinborn/URS Consultants
ADDRESSEE: Kevin Rochlin/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Correction to letter of 1/22/91
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
2. 1.
- 0000009 Microfilm Reel 1
DATE: 03/01/91 PAGES: 1
AUTHOR: Dan Saltzman/Environmental Management Solutions (EMS)
ADDRESSEE: Kevin Rochlin/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Letter reiterating EMS' desire to review 1st round groundwater
monitoring results prior to beginning 2nd round
. ~rame. Begins
1
Ends
1
2. 1.
- 0000010 Microfilm Reel 1
DATE: 04/03/91 PAGES: 2
AUTHOR: URS consultantsl
ADDRESSEE: EPA/
DESCRIPTION: Additional Phase 2 soil sampling specifications
Frame Begins
1
Ends
-------
06/24/93
U. S. Fnvironmental Protection Agency, Region 10
Page
29
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
2. 1.
- 0000011 Microfilm Reel 1
DATE: 04/23/91 PAGES: 4
AUTHOR: Larry H. Zinky/URS Consultants
ADDRESSEE: Diana Phelan/Shannon & Wilson
DESCRIPTION: Letter containing modifications
scenario
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
to the existing AP soil sampling
2. 1.
- 0000012 Microfilm Reel 1
DATE: 05/06/91 PAGES: 8
AUTHOR: Larry H. Zinky/URS Consultants
ADDRESSEE: Kevin Rochlin/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Letter re: Custody History of
Impoundment Sediment Samples
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
Archived Allied Plating
2. 1.
- 0000013 Microfilm Reel 1
DATE: 10/24/91 PAGES: 1
AUTHOR: Kevin Rochlin/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Stan Hodes/
DESCRIPTION: Letter updating Mr. Hodes on status of project at Allied Plating
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
2. ~. . . - 0000014 Microfilm Reel 1
DATE: 11/05/91 PAGES: 1
AUTHOR: Kevin Rochlin/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Mike Stevens/Associated Crane Company
DESCRIPTION: Letter apprising of status of moving the drums
EPA's field sampling out of the crane yard
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
left during the
2. 1.
- 0000015 Microfilm Reel 1
DATE: 11/07/91 PAGES: 16
AUTHOR: Priscilla Anderson/URS Consultants
ADDRESSEE: Carol Sweeney/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Cover letter and attached key portions of "A Review and Analysis
of Parameters for Assessing Transport of Environmentally
Released Radionuclides through Agriculture"
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
-------
Page
06/24/93
u. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
30
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
- 0000016 Microfilm Reel 1
DATE: 03/23/92 PAGES: 1
AUTHOR: Kevin Rochlin/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Robert Van VickIe/Oregon Dept.
DESCRIPTION: Letter updating Mr. Van VickIe
Remedial Investigation
2. 1.
- 0000017 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 03/2~/92 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Kevin Rochlin/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Stan Hodes/
DESCRIPTION: Letter updating Mr. Hodes
Remedial Investigation
1
1
2. 1.
Frame Begins
Ends
1
1
of Transportation
on progress of the Allied Plating
Frame Begins
Ends
1
1
on progress of the Allied Plating
- 0000018 Microfilm Reel 1
DATE: OS/21/92 PAGES: 2
AUTHOR: Stan Hodes/
ADDRESSEE: Kevin Rochlin/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Letter requesting specific
2. 1.
Frame Begins
Ends
1
1
documents
- 0000020 Microfilm Reel 1
DATE: 06/15/92 PAGES: 1
AUTHOR: Kevin Rochlin/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Stan Hodes/
JESCRIPTION: Cover letter for additional copy of the Remedial Investigation
for the site
- 0000021 Microfilm Reel 1
DATE: 07/13/92 PAGES: 7
AUTHOR: Kevin Rochlin/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Jill Kiernan/Oregon Dept. of E~vironmental Quality
JESCRIPTION: Response to 6/25/92 letter regarding the Risk Assessment
- 0000019 Microfilm Reel 1
DATE: 06/12/92 PAGES: 1
AUTHOR: Kevin Rochlin/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Stan Hodes/
DESCRIPTION: Cover letter for RI/FS reports
2. 1.
2. 1.
2. 1.
. ". . :. .'':'.'~
Frame Begins
Ends
1
1
Frame Begins
Ends
1
1
Frame Begins
Ends
1
1
--- ..:.'.
.
-------
06/24/93
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
Page
31
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
2. 1.
- 0000022 Microfilm Reel 1
DATE: 08/19/92 PAGES: 1
AUTHOR: Kevin Rochlin/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Stan Hodes/
DESCRIPTION: Cover letter for 3 documents
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
2. 1. - 1001008 Microfilm Reel Frame Begins 1 Ends 1
DATE: 08/24/92 PAGES: 1
AUTHOR: Division of State Lands (OR)/
ADDRESSEE: / -
DESCRIPTION: Waterway Project Permit Review
SUB-HEAD: 2. 2. Work Plan/scoping Report
2. 2. - 0000003 Microfilm Reel Frame Begins 0 Ends 0
DATE: 01/01/90 PAGES: 43
AUTHOR: URS Consultants/
ADDRESSEE: EPA/
DESCRIPTION: Allied Plating site RI/FS Scoping Report
2. 2. - 0000004 Microfilm Reel Frame Begins 0 Ends 0
DATE: 01/01/90 PAGES: 223
AUTHOR: URS Consultants/
ADDRESSEE: EPA/
DESCRIPTION: Allied Plating site RI/FS Scoping Report Appendices
2. 2. - 0000001 Microfilm Reel Frame Begins 0 Ends 0
DATE: 08/08/90 PAGES: 92
AUTHOR: URS Consultants/
. ADDRESSEE: EPA/
DESCRIPTION: Work Plan Investigation/Feasibility
for Remedial
Study Workplan
- 0000002 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 08/08/90 PAGES: 272
AUTHOR: URS Consultants/
ADDRESSEE: EPA/
DESCRIPTION: Attachments Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study Workplan
2. 2.
Frame Begins
o
Ends
-------
06/24/93
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
Page
32
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
2. 2.
- 0000005 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 04/01/91 PAGES: 165
AUTHOR: URS Consultants/
ADDRESSEE: EPA/
DESCRIPTION: Remedial Investigation/Feasibility
(Appendix C has been placed in the
Administrative Record)
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
Study Work Plan (Revised)
confidential portion of the
2. 2.
- 0000006 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 04/01/91 PAGES: 404
AUTHOR: URS Consultants/
ADDRESSEE: EPA/
DESCRIPTION: Attachments to Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study Work
Plan (Updated)
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
2. 2.
- 0000007 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 08/15/91 PAGES: 35
AUTHOR: URS Consultants/
ADDRESSEE: EPA/
DESCRIPTION: Allied Plating Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study Work
Plan (Revision NO.4)
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
SUB-HEAD:
2. 3.
Trip Report
2. 3.
- 0000002 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 04/23/90 PAGES: 13
AUTHOR: Terry L. Steinborn/URS
ADDRESSEE: Kevin Rochlin/EPA
DESCRIPTION: URS Trip Report covering visit conducted 4/17 through 4/19/90
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
2. 3.
- 0000001 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 06/07/90 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Kevin Rochlin/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Stan Hodes/
JESCRIPTION: Cover letter and attached URS Trip
6
Frame Begins
o
Ends
o
Report for April 1990
-------
06/24/93
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
Page
JJ
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
SUB-HEAD:
2. 4.
Confidential
2. 4.
- 0000001 Microfilm Reel
DATE: / / PAGES: 54
AUTHOR: URS Consultants/
ADDRESSEE: EPA/
DESCRIPTION: Appendix C : Remedial Investigation/Feasibility
Budget (Confidential portion of Admin. Record)
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
Study Project
SUB-HEAD:
2. 5.
XRF Analysis
2. 5.
- 0000001 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 07/07/92 PAGES: 254
AUTHOR: Kevin Rochlin/EPA
ADDRESSEE: /
DESCRIPTION: XRF Analysis of Surface Soil Contaminant
at the Allied Plating Site Final Report
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
Distribution and Depth
SUB-HEAD:
2. 6.
Remedial Investigation
2. 6.
- 0000001 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 04/13/92 PAGES: 235
AUTHOR: URS Consultants/Shannon & Wilson, Inc./MED-TOX Associates, Inc.
ADDRESSEE: EPA/ .
DESCRIPTION: Remedial Investigation Allied Plating Site, Portland, Oregon
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
2. 6.
- 0000002 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 04/13/92 PAGES: 186
AUTHOR: URS Consultants/Shannon & Wilson,
ADDRESSEE: EPA/
DESCRIPTION: Remedial Investigation
site, Portland, Oregon
. F::rame Beg ins
1
Ends
1
Inc./MED-TOX Associates, Inc.
Appendices A, B, C, and D Allied Plating
2. 6.
- 0000003 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 04/13/92 PAGES: 364
AUTHOR: URS Consultants/Shannon & Wilson,
ADDRESSEE: EPA/
DESCRIPTION: Remedial Investigation Appendix
Plating Site, Portland, Oregon
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
Inc./MED-TOX Associates, Inc.
-------
06/24/93
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
Page
34
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
2. 6.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
- 0000004 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 04/13/92 PAGES: 768
AUTHOR: URS Consultants/Shannon & Wilson, Inc./MED-TOX Associates, Inc.
ADDRESSEE: EPA/
DESCRIPTION: Remedial Investigation Appendix F Data Validation Reports,
Volume 1 Allied Plating Site, Portland, Oregon
- OaOO005 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 04/13/92 PAGES: 812
AUTHOR: URS Consultants/Shannon & Wilson, Inc./MED-TOX Associates, Inc.
ADDRESSEE: EPA/
DESCRIPTION: Remedial Investigation Appendix F Data Validation Reports,
Volume 2 Allied Plating site, Portland, Oregon
2. 6.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
- 0000006 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 10/02/92 PAGES: 20
AUTHOR: URS Consultants/
ADDRESSEE: EPA/
DESCRIPTION: Appendix G Risk Assessment Tables
2. 6.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
Addendum
- 0000007 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 10/12/92 PAGES: 78
AUTHOR: URS Consultants/
ADDRESSEE: EPA/
DESCRIPTION: Remedial Investigation Baseline Risk Assessment
2. 6.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
Addendum
SUB-HEAD:
2. 7.
Feasibility study (Draft only)
- 0000001 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 05/13/92 PAGES: 109
AUTHOR: URS Consultants/
ADDRESSEE: EPA/
DESCRIPTION: Draft Allied Plating Feasibility Study
2. 7.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
SUB-HEAD:
2. 8.
-------
06/24/93
u. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
Page
35
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
2. 8.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
- 0000001 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 02/03/92 PAGES: 46
AUTHOR: URS Consultants/
ADDRESSEE: EPA/
DESCRIPTION: Allied Plating Preliminary
screening of Alternatives Report
2. 8.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
- 0000002 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 04/~6/92 PAGES: 15
AUTHOR: John W. Buckley/URS Consultants
ADDRESSEE: Kevin Rochlin/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Cover letter and attached Draft
Alternatives
On-Site Remedial Action
SUB-HEAD:
2. 9.
Work Plan for Removal and Disposal (incorporated
by reference)
2. 9.
Microfilm Reel
PAGES: 582
the Army, Corps of Engineers/
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
- 0000001
DATE: 03/29/93
AUTHOR: Dept. of
ADDRESSEE: EPA/
DESCRIPTION: (This document is incorporated by reference only - see Allied
Plating Removal Administrative Record File 1.6, document #
0010004 for actual copy) Volume 1 : Final Project Work Plan for
the Removal and Disposal of contaminated Material
2. 9.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
- 0000002 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 03/29/93 PAGES: 407
AUTHOR: Dept. of the Army, Corps of Engineers/
ADDRESSEE: EPA/ .
DESCRIPTION: (This document is incorporated by reference only - see Allied
Plating Removal Administrative Record File 1.6, document #
0010005 for actual copy) Volume 2 : Final Project Work Plan for
the Removal and Disposal of Contaminated Material
2. 9.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
- 0000003 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 03/29/93 PAGES: 582
AUTHOR: Dept. of ~e Army, Corps of Engineers/
ADDRESSEE: EPAI '
DESCRIPTION: (This document is incorporated by reference only - see Allied
Plating Removal Administrative Record File 1.6, Doc. # 0010006
for actual copy) Volume 3 : ,Final Project Work Plan for the
-------
06/24/93
u. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
Page
-------
06/24/93
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
Page
37
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
HEADING:
4. O.
STATE COORDINATION
SUB-HEAD:
4. 1.
Correspondence
4. 1.
Frame Begins
o
Ends
o
- 0000001 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 02/03/87 PAGES:' 2
AUTHOR: Kathryn Davidson/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Delores Streeter/Intergovernmental Relations Division
DESCRIPTION: Let~er notifying of potential Superfund project, 60 day
period
comment
4. 1. - 0000002 Microfilm Reel Frame Begins 1 Ends 1
DATE: 03/17/87 PAGES: 3
AUTHOR: Delores Streeter/State of Oregon
ADDRESSEE: EPA/
DESCRIPTION: Oregon Intergovernmental Project Review
Frame Begins 1 Ends 1
- 0000003 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 04/13/92 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Debbie Bailey/DEQ
. ADDRESSEE: File/
DESCRIPTION: 4/8/92 meeting with City of Portland Representatives
4. 1.
6
4. 1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
- 0000005 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 04/13/92 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Debbie Bailey/DEQ
ADDRESSEE: File/
DESCRIPTION: 4/8/92 meeting minutes
2
SUB-HEAD:
4. 2.
ARARs
4. 2.
. Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
- 0000001 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 01/15/92 PAGES: 200
AUTHOR: Sally Puent/oregon Dept. of Environmental Quality (DEQ)
ADDRESSEE: Kevin Rochlin/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Cover letter and attached packet of information on the
prelimina~~ list of ARARs - a summary describing the ARARs is
-------
06/24/93
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMIN1STRATIVE RECORD INDEX
-
Fage
-------
06/24/93
U. S. Environmental Prot~ction Agency, Region 10
Page
39
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
HEADING:
5. o.
ENFORCEMENT
SUB-HEAD:
5. 1.
Correspondence
- 0000001 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 08/14/87 PAGES:
AUTHOR: D. Henry Elsen/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Lee M. Hess/Swire, Riebe & Hess
DESCRIPTION: Letter stating EPA's conditions for a
that unless these conditions are met,
5. 1.
Frame Begins
o
Ends
o
2
good faith proposal, and
EPA will conduct the RI/FS
- 0000002 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 08/26/87 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Lee M. Hess/Swire, Riebe
ADDRESSEE: D. Henry Elsen/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Letter setting out their
5. 1.
Frame Begins
o
Ends
o
3
& Hess
client's (Stan Hodes) position
- 0000003 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 08/27/87 PAGES: 2
AUTHOR: Lee M. Hess/Swire, Riebe...
ADDRESSEE: Henry Elsen/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Cover letter for Scope of Work submittal
5. 1.
Frame Begins
o
Ends
o
- 0000004 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 08/28/87 PAGES:
AUTHOR: D. Henry Elsen/EPa
ADDRESSEE: Lee. M. Hess/Swire, Riebe...
DESCRIPTION: Letter responding to Mr. Hess'
5. 1.
Frame Begins
o
Ends
o
2
letter of 8/26/87
5. 1.
Microfilm. Reel
PAGES:
Wong/EPA
Frame Begins
o
Ends
o
- 0000005
DATE: 09/01/87
AUTHOR: Philip M.
ADDRESSEE: File/
DESCRIPTION: Memorandum stating that if owner does
within 60 days, then EPA will conduct
initiated for EPA funding
1
not submit a proposal
-------
06/24/93
u. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
Page
40
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
5. 1.
Frame Begins
o
Ends
o
- 0000006 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 09/01/87 PAGES:
AUTHOR: D. Henry Elsen/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Lee M. Hess/Swire, Riebe...
DESCRIPTION: Letter stating that EPA will
good faith proposal
1
not extend the 9/8/87 deadline for
- 0060007 Microfilm. Reel
DATE: 09/08/87 PAGES: 8
AUTHOR: Lee M. Hess/Swire, Riebe...
ADDRESSEE: Henry Elsen/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Cover letter and accompanying
5. 1.
Frame Begins
o
Ends
o
good faith proposal
- 0000008 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 09/15/87 PAGES:
AUTHOR: D. Henry Elsen/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Lee M. Hess/Swire, Riebe...
DESCRIPTION: Letter stating 2 conditions
continue negotiations
5. 1.
Frame Begins
o
Ends
o
1
that must be met in order for EPA to
- 0000011 Microfilm Reel 1
DATE: 09/18/87 PAGES: 7
AUTHOR: Lee M. Hess/Swire, Riebe & Hess
ADDRESSEE: Edward J. Dunn/John R. Boomer/Richard J. Price/Jay T.
Waldron/Roger Westendorf/Lyle Cerney
DESCRIPTION: Letter and attachments discussing expense estimate from Century
West and deadline for submitting.a~etailed work plan to EPA
5. 1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
- 0000009 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 09/25/87 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Lee M. Hess/Swire, Riebe
ADDRESSEE: Henry Elsen/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Cover letter and attached
5. 1.
Frame Begins
o
Ends
o
6
copy of Industrial Indemnity's letter
- 0000012 Microfilm Reel 1
DATE: 01/28/88 PAGES: 1
AUTHOR: D. Henry Elsen/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Lee M. Hess/swire, Riebe and Hess
DESCRIPTION: Letter .stating that Hess' offer of
consideration and that Monica Kirk
to the case
5. 1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
settlement is under
-------
06/24/93
u. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
Page
41
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
5. 1.
- 0000010 Microfilm Reel 1
DATE: 02/11/88 PAGES: 5
AUTHOR: Monica Kirk/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Lee M. Hess/Swire, Riebe
DESCRIPTION: Letter re: Allied Plating Settlement,
enclosed
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
Consent for Access form
- 0000014 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 03/10/88 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Lee M. Hess/Swire, Rieve
ADDRESSEE: Monica J. Kirk/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Cover letter and attached
5. 1.
1
4
& Hess
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
Voluntary Consent forr Blocks Hand L
- 0000013 Microfilm Reel 1
DATE: 07/22/88 PAGES: 2
AUTHOR: Yone C. McNally/Oregon Dept. of Environmental Quality
ADDRESSEE: Monica Kirk/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Letter re: DEQ Administrative Actions Against Allied Plating, et
al .
5. 1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
- 0000015 Microfilm Reel 1
DATE: 11/14/88 PAGES: 6
AUTHOR: Monica Kirk/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Lee M. Hess/Swire, Riebe & Hess
DESCRIPTION: Letter re: offer made on behalf of client, and
the property owner's responsibility to acquire
Associated Crane and Truck Parts ',.
5. 1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
noting that it is
access from
- 0000016 Microfilm Reel 1
DATE: 11/02/89 PAGES: . 1
AUTHOR: Stan Hodes/
ADDRESSEE: Philip Millam/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Letter re: EPA's letter of 10/30/89, noting present attorney and
advising that he may not be able to meet stated deadline
5. 1.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
-------
06/24/93
u. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
Page
42
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
5. 1.
- 0000017 Microfilm Reel 1
DATE: 11/09/89 PAGES: 1
AUTHOR: Marvin S. W. Swire/Sussman, Shank, Wapnick, Caplan & stiles
ADDRESSEE: Monica Kirk/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Letter confirming that the time be extended to reply to
communication asking for field studies on property
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
5. 1.
- 0000018 Microfilm Reel 1
DATE: 11/14/89 PAGES: 2
AUTHOR: Monica Kirk/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Marvin swire/Sussman, Shank, et al
DESCRIPTION: Letter stating terms that EPA can consider, and confirming
extension of time to respond to EPAs request for access to the
site
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
5. 1.
- 0000019 Microfilm Reel 1
DATE: 11/17/89 PAGES: 3
AUTHOR: Jeffrey R. Spere/Sussman, Shank, et al
ADDRESSEE: Monica Kirk/EPA
DESCRIPT~ON: Letter granting access to portions of the property
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
5. 1.
- 0000020 Microfilm Reel 1
DATE: 01/24/90 PAGES: 1
AUTHOR: Edward J. Kowalski/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Jeffrey R. Spere/Sussman, Shank, et al
DESCRIPTION: Letter inquiring whether RI/FS Scoping Report was
stating that EPA needs a signed co~y of an access
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
received, and
agreement
SUB-HEAD:
5. 2.
Notice Letters and Responses
- 0000001 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 09/02/82 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Alexandra B. Smith/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Ernst Stierly/Allied Plating
DESCRIPTION: CERCLA 104 (e) information request
5. 2.
Frame Begins
o
Ends
o
-------
06/24/93
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
Page
43
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
5. 2. - 0000002 Microfilm Reel Frame Begins 0 Ends 0
DATE: 01/31/85 PAGES: 1
AUTHOR: H.S. Coulter/Oregon Dept. of Transportation (DOT)
ADDRESSEE: Ernest A. Schmidt/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Letter re: state's ownership of property
Frame Begins 0 Ends 0
- 0000003 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 03/95/85 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Robert A. Sandmann/DOT
ADDRESSEE: Ernest A. Schmidt/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Letter re: state's boundaries
requesting a meeting
5. 2.
1
near Allied Plating, and
5. 2. - 0000004 Microfilm Reel Frame Begins 0 Ends 0
DATE: 12/10/85 PAGES: 2
AUTHOR: J. B. Boyd/DOT
ADDRESSEE: Charles E. Findley/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Response to 11/20/85 Information Request
5. 2. - 0000005 Microfilm Reel Frame Begins 0 Ends 0
DATE: 05/05/87 PAGES: 4
AUTHOR: Charles E. Findley/EPA
ADDRESSEE: J.B. Boyd/DOT
DESCRIPTION: CERCLA 104 (e) notice letter
5. 2. - 0000006 Microfilm Reel Frame Begins 0 Ends 0
DATE: 05/05/87 PAGES: 4
AUTHOR: Charles E. Findley/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Stan Hodes/
DESCRIPTION: CERCLA 104 (e) notice letter
5. 2. - 0000007 Microfilm Reel Frame Begins 0 Ends 0
DATE: OS/27/87 PAGES: 1
AUTHOR: D. Henry Elsen/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Lee M. Hess/Swire, Riebe...
DESCRIPTION: Cover letter for copies of information request sent to Hess's
client, St;an Hodes
-------
06/24/93
u. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
44
Page
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
5. 2.
- 0000008 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 06/05/87 PAGES:
AUTHOR: J. B. Boyd/DOT
ADDRESSEE: Philip Wong/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Response to 5/5/87 notice
4
letter
5. 2.
- 0000009 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 06/05/87 PAGES: 1
AUTHOR: Lee M. Hess/Swire, Riebe...
ADDRESSEE: Charles E. Findley/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Letter stating that 5/5/87 notice
5/29/87, requesting until 6/29 to
5. 2.
- 0000010 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 06/05/87 PAGES: 2
AUTHOR: Wendy A. Robinson/Dept. of
ADDRESSEE: Henry Elsen/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Response to 5/5/87 notice
Justice
letter sent to DOT
Frame Begins
o
Ends
o
Frame Begins
o
Ends
o
letter was not received until
submit response
Frame Begins
Ends
o
o
5. 2. - 0000011 Microfilm Reel Frame Begins 0 Ends 0
DATE: 06/15/87 PAGES: 1
AUTHOR: D. Henry Elsen/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Lee M. Hess/Swire, Riebe...
DESCRIPTION: Letter granting extension to respond to 5/5/87 letter
Frame, Begins 0 Ends 0
5. 2.
- 0000012 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 06/17/87 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Lee M. Hess/Swire, Riebe
ADDRESSEE: Phil Wonq/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Partial response to 5/5/87 notice letter
3
5. 2.
- 0000013 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 06/29/87 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Lee M. Hess/Swire, Riebe
ADDRESSEE: Phil'Wong/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Supplement to previous response
1
Frame Begins
o
Ends
-------
06/24/93
u. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
Page
45
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
5. 2.
- 0000014 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 07/01/87 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Lee M. Hess/Swire, Riebe
ADDRESSEE: Phil Wong/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Correction to error on deed
Frame Begins
o
Ends
o
1
5. 2.
- 0000020 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 07/e6/87 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Charles Findley/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Lee M. Hess (Attorney for stanley HOdes)/Swire, Riebe & Hess
DESCRIPTION: Letter stating that RI/FS is determined to be necessary at the
Allied Plating Site, offering Mr. and Mrs. Hodes 60 days to make
a good faith proposal to conduct the RI/FS
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
3
5. 2.
- 0000021 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 07/06/87 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Charles Findley/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Herbert and Gloria Sugg/
DESCRIPTION: Letter stating that RI/FS is determined to be necessary at
Allied Plating Site, offering Mr. and Mrs. Sugg 60 days in
to make a good faith proposal to conduct the RI/FS
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
3
the
which
5. 2.
- 0000015 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 07/28/87 PAGES: 3
AUTHOR: John s. Karpinski/Attorney at Law
ADDRESSEE: Phillip Wong/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Response to 7/6/87 request for information
Frame Begins
o
Ends
o
5. 2.
- 0000016 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 02/10/88 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Charles E. Findley/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Lee M. Hess/swire, Riebe...
DESCRIPTION: Cercla 104 (b) request for information
Frame Begins
o
Ends
o
2
5. 2.
- 0000017 Microfilm Reel
10/30/89 . PAGES:
Phil Millam/EPA
Stan Hodes/ .
Notice letter that EPA will not accept settlement offer, will
not enter into negotiations for PRP RI/FS, and, is providing
formal notice of EPA conducted RI/FS
Frame Begins
o
Ends
o
DATE:
AUTHOR:
ADDRESSEE:
DESCRIPTION:
-------
06/24/93
u. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
Page
46
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
5. 2.
- 0000018 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 11/02/89 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Stan Hodes/
ADDRESSEE: Phil Millam/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Letter stating that Mr.
of 11/20/89
Frame Begins
o
Ends
o
1
Hodes may not be able to meet deadline
5. 2.
- 0000019 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 11/07/89 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Monica Kirk/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Wendy A. Robinson/Oregon Dept.
DESCRIPTION: Letter notifying that EPA does
of negotiation with DOT
Frame Begins
o
Ends
o
1
of Justice
not intend to commence a period
SUB-HEAD:
5. 3.
Access Agreements
5. 3.
- 0000001 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 09/06/90 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Kevin Rochlin/EPA
ADDRESSEE: A.F. Grabhorn/
DESCRIPTION: Request for permission to drill and maintain monitoring wells;
enclosures
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
7
5. 3.
- 0000002 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 09/06/90 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Kevin Rochlin/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Ted and Elizabeth Lamm/
DESCRIPTION: Request for permission to
enclosures
7
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
drill ~nd'mairitain monitoring well~;
5. 3.
- 0000003 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 09/06/90 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Kevin Rochlin/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Manager/Nabisco
DESCRIPTION: Request for permission to drill and maintain monitoring wells;
enclosures
7
Frame Begins
1
Ends
-------
06/24/93
u. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
Page
47
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
5. 3.
- 0000004 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 09/06/90 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Kevin Rochlin/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Navistar International Corp./
DESCRIPTION: Request for permission to drill and maintain monitoring wells;
enclosures
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
7
- 0000005 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 09/06/90 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Kevin Rochlin/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Owner or Manager/Plew's Demolition and Construction, Inc.
DESCRIPTION: Request for permission to drill and maintain monitoring wells;
enclosures
5. 3.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
7
- 0000006 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 09/17/90 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Kevin Rochlin/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Elizabeth Lamm/
DESCRIPTION: Confirmation that Mrs. Lamm has agreed to allow EPA to install
wells on her property
5. 3.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
1
- 0000007 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 09/26/90 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Kevin Rochlin/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Owner or Manager/Plew's Demo~ition and Construction, Inc.
DESCRIPTION: Second request for permission to gain access and install
monitoring wells on Plew's property
5. 3.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
4
- 0000008 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 09/26/90 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Kevin Rochlin/EPA
ADDRESSEE: stan B. Collins/
DESCRIPTION: Request for permission to drill and maintain monitoring wells;
enclosures
5. 3.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
4
-------
06/24/93
u. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
Page
48
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
5. 3.
- 0000009 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 10/09/90 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Kevin Rochlin/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Al Grabhorn/
DESCRIPTION: Confirmation that Mr. Grabhorn has agreed to allow EPA to
install wells on his property - signed agreement and letter
attached
3
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
5. 3.
- 0000010 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 10/09/90 PAGES: 3
AUTHOR: A.F. Morton/Nabisco Brands, Inc.
ADDRESSEE: Kevin Rochlin/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Cover letter and attached signed
Right-of-Entry to Property"
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
"Consent for Access and
s. 3.
- 0000011 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 10/11/90 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Kevin Rochlin/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Gene Plew/
DESCRIPTION: Letter requesting permission to access property and install
monitoring well and stating that EPA has the authority to do
this
3
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
s. 3.
- 0000012 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 10/19/90 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Kevin Rochlin/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Gene Plew/
DESCRIPTION: Letter requesting access
request for access
2
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
to two wells not included on original
5. 3.
- 0000013 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 10/22/90 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Stan B. Collins/
ADDRESSEE: Kevin Rochlin/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Letter resending request
7
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
.
for access to property
-------
06/24/93
u. S. Environmental Prot~ction Agency, Region 10
Page
49
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
5. 3.
- 0000014 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 10/22/90 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Kevin Rochlin/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Terry Steinborn/URS Consultants
DESCRIPTION: Letter delaying field work for one week
required to obtain court ordered access
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
1
due to additional time
to the property
5. 3.
- 00~0015 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 10/23/90 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Kevin Rochlin/EPA
ADDRESSEE: A.F. Morton/Nabisco
DESCRIPTION: Letter acknowledging receipt of
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
1
access agreement
5. 3.
- 0000016 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 10/26/90 PAGES: 1
AUTHOR: H. Philip Eder/Reeves, Kahn & Eder
ADDRESSEE: Dean B. Ingemansen/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Letter listing terms under which Eder's client (Stan Hodes) will
allow access to property
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
5. 3.
- 0000017 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 10/30/90 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Kevin Rochlin/EPA
ADDRESSEE: site file/
DESCRIPTION: Letter documenting 10~30/90
Associated Crane, lessee of
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
1
telephone conversation with
the Allied Plating site
5. 3.
- 0000018 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 11/01/90 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Dean B. Ingemansen/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Plew's Demolition/
JESCRIPTION: Letter explaining statutory authority under which EPA may
access to property, includes another request for access
5
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
gain
- 0000019 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 11/09/90 PAGES: 3
AUTHOR: H. Philip Eder/Reeves, Kahn & Eder
ADDRESSEE: Dean B. Ingemansen/EPA
>ESCRIPTION: Cover letter and attached signed "Consent' for Accessand
, Right-of-Entry to Property"
5. 3.
Frame Begins
1
Ends
-------
06/24/93
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
Page
50
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
5. 3.
- 0000020 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 11/16/90 PAGES: 1
AUTHOR: Franz Rotter/High Tech Recycling Systems Corporation
ADDRESSEE: /
DESCRIPTION: Signed "Consent for Access and Right-of-Entry to Property"
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
5. 3.
- 0000021 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 11t~6/90 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Kevin Rochlin/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Goerge Helm/Street System Management
DESCRIPTION: Letter requesting permit to drill and
intersection of NE Mallory Avenue and
2
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
sample 1 borehole at the
NE Halleck Street
SUB-HEAD:
5. 4.
Deed Restriction
5. 4.
- 1001006 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 04/13/93 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Kevin Rochlin/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Stan Hodes/
DESCRIPTION: Letter requesting that deed restriction
property as soon as possible
1
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
be placed on the
5. 4.
- 1001007 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 04/15/93 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Kevin Rochlin/EPA
ADDRESSEE: H. Philip Eder/Reeves, Kahn & Eder
DESCRIPTION: Addition to the Deed Restriction
1
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
5. 4.
- 1001005 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 04/28/93 PAGES: 2
AUTHOR: H. Philip Eder/Reeves, Kahn & Eder
ADDRESSEE: Kevin Rochlin/BPA
DESCRIPTION: Cover letter and enclosed copy of the
Restrictions
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
-------
06/24/93
u. s. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
:
Page
-------
06/24/93
u. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
Page
52
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
HEADING:
6. O.
HEALTH ASSESSMENTS
SUB-HEAD:
6. 2.
ATSDR Health Assessments
6. 2.
- 0000001 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 07/19/88 PAGES: 2
AUTHOR: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry/(ATSDR)
ADDRESSEE: /
DESCRIPTION: Pr~liminary Health Assessment for Allied Plating, Portland,
Oregon
Frame Begins
o
Ends
-------
06/24/93
U. S. Environmental Prot~ction Agency, Region 10
Page
53
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
HEADING:. 7. O.
NATURAL RESOURCE TRUSTEES
SUB-HEAD:
7. 1.
Correspondence
7. 1.
- 0000001 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 10/20/88 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Robert Pavia/NOAA
ADDRESSEE: Bruce M. Diamond/NOAA
DESCRIPTION: NOAA's Preliminary Natural Resource Survey for
(Confidential portion of this document located
Headquarters, Seattle, WA)
Frame Begins
o
Ends
o
7
Allied Plating
at EPA Region 10
SUB-HEAD:
7. 2.
Preliminary Natural Resource Survey
7. 2.
- 1001004 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 04/09/93 PAGES: 21
AUTHOR: Jonathan P. Deason/U.S. Dept. of the Interior
ADDRESSEE: Randall F. Smith/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Cover letter re: Preliminary Natural Resources Survey and
attached "Background and Technical Support Information"
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
-------
06/24/93
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
Page
54
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
HEADING:
8. O.
CONGRESSIONAL/PRESIDENTIAL INQUIRIES
SUB-HEAD:
8. 1.
Correspondence
8. 1.
- 0000001 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 03/07/85 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Stan Hodes/
ADDRESSEE: President Reagan/
DESCRIPTION: Letter to inform President of
3
Frame Begins
o
Ends
o
serious problem at Allied Plating
8. 1.
- 0000002 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 03/17/85 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Stan Hodes/
ADDRESSEE: President Reagan/
DESCRIPTION: Letter stating the Hodes
Plating
5
Frame Begins
o
Ends
o
family's thoughts in regard to Allied
8. 1.
- 0000003 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 04/04/85 PAGES:
AUTFOR: Ernesta B. Barnes/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Bob Packwood/U.S. Senate
DESCRIPTION: Response to 3/19/85 letter
2
Frame Begins
o
Ends
o
8. 1.
- 0000012 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 02/02/87 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Joan Shafer/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Representative Ron Wyden/ .
DESCRIPTION: Cover letter for Superfund public docket for the Allied Plating
facility, 1/22/87 Federal Register announcing proposal to
include Allied Plating to the NPL
1
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
8. 1.
- 0000011 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 03/17/87 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Stan Hodes/
ADDRESSEE: The President/
DESCRIPTION: Letter stating
Plating
2
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
Mr. Hodes' observations of situati~n at Allied
-------
06/24/93
u. S. Environmental Prot~ction Agency, Region 10
Page
55
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
8. 1.
- 0000004 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 04/09/87 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Fred Hansen/DEQ
ADDRESSEE: Mark Hatfield/U.S. Senate
DESCRIPTION: Response to 3/31/87 letter
Frame Begins
o
Ends
o
1
- 0000005 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 06/~/87 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Philip M. Wong/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Ron Wyden/Congressman
DESCRIPTION: Cover letter transmitting
8. 1.
Frame Begins 0 Ends 0
1
copy of EPA's file on Allied Plating
Frame Begins 0 Ends 0
2
8. 1.
- 0000006 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 08/25/87 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Stan Hodes/
ADDRESSEE: President Reagan/
DESCRIPTION: Letter asking for a de minimis settlement
8. 1.
- 0000007 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 10/07/87 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Tom Miller/DEQ
ADDRESSEE: Margaret Carter/Representative, Oregon,
DESCRIPTION: Letter transmitting Community Relations
Frame Begins
o
Ends
o
1
Legislative District 18
Plan
8. 1.
- 0000008 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 11/13/87 PAGES: 10
AUTHOR: Stanley Hodes/
ADDRESSEE: Mark Hatfield/U.S. Senate
DESCRIPTION: Letter re: hexavalent chrome,
Frame Begins
o
Ends
o
sample charts enclosed
- 0000009 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 12/08/87 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Stan Hodes/
ADDRESSEE: Robie Russell/EPA
)ESCRIPTION: Letter in response to
8. 1.
Frame Begins
o
Ends
o
1
8/25/87 letter to President Reagan
-------
06/24/93
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
Page
56
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
8. 1.
- 0000010 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 03/30/88 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Tim Brincefield/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Merrie H. Buel/Field Representative for
DESCRIPTION: Letter transmitting Community Relations
Frame Begins
o
Ends
o
1
Congressman Ron Wyden
Plan
8. 1.
- 0000014 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 12f19/89 PAGES: 4
AUTHOR: Mark O. Hatfield/United States Senate
ADDRESSEE: Robie Russell/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Letter requesting review and response to attached letter from
stan Hodes
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
8. 1.
- 0000013 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 01/05/90 PAGES:
AUTHOR: Robie G. Russell/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Honorable Mark O. Hatfield/United States Senate
DESCRIPTION: Letter in response to the 12/19/89 request from
constitutent, Stan Hodes
2
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
Hatfield's
8. 1.
- 0000015 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 04/25/90 PAGES:
AUTHOR: stan Hodes/
ADDRESSEE: Richard Darman/Office of Management and Budget
DESCRIPTION: Letter stating that EPA has involved Mr. Hodes in an expensive
Remedial Investigation that by reasonable standards should not
take place
8
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
8. 1.
- 0000016 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 10/23/90 PAGES: 3
AUTHOR: Walter G. Gilbert/Office of the Inspector General
ADDRESSEE: Kevin Rochlin/EPA
DESCRIPTION: Cover letter and attached copy of letter sent to Stan Hodes
reqardinq his allegations of EPA mismanagement of the Allied
Plating Superfund Site
Frame Begins
1
Ends
-------
06/24/93
u. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
-
Page
-------
06/24/93
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
Page
58
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
.
HEADING:
9. O.
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
SUB-HEAD:
9. 2.
Community Relations Plan
9. 2.
- 0000001 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 09/01/87 PAGES: 34
AUTHOR: EPA/
ADDRESSEE: /
DESCRIPTION: Fi~l Community Relations Plan
Frame Begins
o
Ends
o
9. 2.
- 0000002
06/19/91
EPA/
/
Superfund
Microfilm Reel
PAGES:
1
Frame Begins
1-
Ends
1
DATE:
AUTHOR:
ADDRESSEE:
DESCRIPTION:
Community Relations Plan Addendum Site Schedule Update
SUB-HEAD:
9. 3-.
Fact Sheets and Press Releases
9. 3.
- 0000002 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 01/22/87 PAGES:
AUTHOR: EPA/
ADDRESSEE: /
DESCRIPTION: News release
5
Frame Begins
o
Ends
o
9. 3.
- 0000003 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 01/22/87 PAGES:
AUTHOR: EPA/
ADDRESSEE: /
)ESCRIPTION: News release
3
Frame Begins
o
Ends
o
9. 3.
- 0000001
DATE: 02/02/87
AUTHOR: EPA/
ADDRESSEE: /
IESCRIPTION: Fact Sheet
Microfilm Reel
PAGES:
1
Frame Begins
o
Ends
o
-------
06/24/93
u. S. Environmental Pro~ection Agency, Region 10
Page
59
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
9. 3.
- 0000004 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 03/02/90 PAGES:
AUTHOR: EPA/
ADDRESSEE: /
DESCRIPTION: Fact Sheet Allied Plating
2
Frame Begins
o
Ends
o
9. 3.
- 0000005 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 11/01/90 PAGES:
AUTHOR: EPA/
ADDRESSEE: /
DESCRIPTION: Superfund Fact
Oreqon
1
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
Sheet: Allied Platinq Superfund Site,
Portland,
9. 3.
- 0000006 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 06/19/91 PAGES:
AUTHOR: EPA/
ADDRESSEE: /
DESCRIPTION: Superfund Fact Sheet:
investiqate the extent
Superfund Site
2
Frame Beqins
1
Ends
1
Allied Plating: EPA is continuing to
of contamination at the Allied Platinq
9. 3. ,. - 0000007 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 10/19/92 PAGES:
AUTHOR: EPA/
ADDRESSEE: /
DESCRIPTION: Superfund Fact Sheet: Allied Platinq : On 10/21/92 EPA will
beqin a removal action to excavate and dispose of contaminated
soil from the Allied Plating Superfund Site
1
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
SUB-HEAD:
9. 4.
Newspaper Articles
9. 4.
- 0000001 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 01/23/87 PAGES: 1
AUTHOR: Michael Rollinqs/The Oreqonian
ADDRESSEE: /
)ESCRIPTION: Newspaper article "EPA names Portland sludqe pond for Superfund
Cleanup"
Frame Beqins
1
Ends
1
-
-------
..
06/24/93
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
Page
60
.
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
SUB-HEAD:
9. 5.
Public Notices
9. 5.
- 1001002 Microfilm Reel
DATE: / / PAGES:
AUTHOR: /
ADDRESSEE: /
DESCRIPTION: Newspaper notice announcing the Public Comment Period on
Proposed Plan for Allied Plating Superfund Site - 4/28-5/28/93
1
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
SUB-HEAD:
9. 6.
Proposed Plan
9. 6.
- 1001001 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 04/29/63 PAGES:
AUTHOR: EPA/
ADDRESSEE: /
DESCRIPTION: The Proposed
5
Frame Begins
1
Ends
1
Plan - PUblic Comment Period 4/28-5/28/93
-------
06/24/93
U. S. Environmental prot~ction Agency, Region 10
Page
61
ALLIED PLATING - REMEDIAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
HEADING: 10. O.
TECHNICAL SOURCES AND GUIDANCE DOCUMENTS
SUB-HEAD: 10. 1.
EPA Guidance
10. 1.
Microfilm Reel
PAGES:
Frame Begins
o
Ends
o
- 0000001
DATE: 08/01/90
AUTHOR: EPAI
ADDRESSEE: /
DESCRIPTION: List of
4
Guidances Used
SUB-HEAD: 10. 2.
State Guidance
10. 2.
- 0000001 Microfilm Reel
DATE: 09/09/88 PAGES: 88
AUTHOR: Fred HansenlDEQ
ADDRESSEE: Environmental Quality Commission (EOC) I
DESCRIPTION: Agenda Item X, 9/9/88, EOC M~eting, Executive Summary of Staff
Report Requesting Adoption of Proposed Remedial Action Rules
Regarding Degree of Cleanup and Selection of the Remedial
Action, OAR Chapter 340, Division 122
Frame Begins
o
Ends
o
SUB-HEAD: 10. 3.
Technical Sources
10. 3.
- 0000001 Microfilm Reel
DATE: I I PAGES:
AUTHOR: I
ADDRESSEE: /
DESCRIPTION: 3 page excerpt on Chromium
Frame Begins
o
Ends
o
3
10. J.
- 0000002 MicrofilmReel
DATE: 07/06/90 PAGES: 11
AUTHOR: Pat Cirone/EPA
ADDRESSEE: Superfund Remedial Project Managers
JESCRIPTION: Memorandum re: Detection Limits for
Frame.Begins
1
Ends
1
and OSC'sIEPA
Human Health Risk Assessment
------- |