United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of
Emergency and
Remedial Response..
EP AIRODIR05-90/123
March 1990
c«fY~
oEPA
Superfund
Record of Decision:
,.
~
Wayne Waste Oil, IN
@ Printed on Recycled Paper
-------
50272.101
REPORT DOCUMENTATION 11. REPORTNO. '12.
PAGE EPA/ROD/R05-90/123
3. Reciplent'8 Ac:ceaalon No.
4. Title end Subtitle
SUPERFUND RECORD OF DECISION
Wayne Waste Oil, IN
First Remedial Action - Final
7. Author(e)
'.
5. Report Dete
03/30/90
6.
8. Perfonnlng o..genlzation Re~ No.
g. Perfonnlng o..gelnlzation Heme end Add.....
10. ProjectlTaeklWork Unit No.
11. Contreet(C) or Grant(G) No.
(C)
(G)
"
12. Sponeorlng Orgenlzatlon Heme end Addre..
U.S. Envlronmental Protection
401 M Street, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20460
13. Type of Report & Period Covered
Agency
800/000
14.
15. Supplementery Note.
16. Abetrect (Limit: 200 worde)
The 30-acre Wayne Waste Oil site is a former oil reclamation operation and municipal
landfill in Columbia City, Indiana. The site lies within the Blue River floodplain, and
a wetlands area is located on site. The site overlies a contaminated unconsolidated
surficial aquifer. From 1953 to 1970, part of the site was operated as a municipal
landfill. From 1975 to 1982, waste oil reclamation activities, which included the
torage and handling of hazardous wastes were conducted onsite. Site features include
~n incinerator, on site disposal pits, buried drums, vacant office buildings, and several
above-ground and underground storage tanks, which contain hazardous material. From 1979
to 1980, an estimated 250,000 gallons of hazardous waste were illegally dumped onsite
and allowed to percolate into the soil. In addition the current landfill cap is not
adequate to prevent exposure of buried landfill material. Removal actions by potentially
responsible parties (PRPs) in 1986 and 1988 resulted in remediation of several onsite
disposal pits, and the removal and offsite disposal of 340 buried drums, the contents of
23 storage tanks, over 12,900 tons of contaminated soil from the onsite pits, and
implementation of site access restrictions. Site investigations by the PRP under a
Consent Order from 1988 to 1989, characterized the location and extent of remaining
(See Attached Paqe)
17. Document Anely.l. L Deecrlptore
Record of Decision - Wayne Waste Oil, IN
First Remedial Action - Final
Contaminated Media: soil, debris, gw
Key Contaminants: VOCs (benzene, PCE, TCE, toluene, xylenes),
phenols), metals (arsenic, chromium, lead)
organics (PAHs,
b. Identifler8l0pen-Ended T erme
c. CooA TI Reid/Group
18. Avellabllily Statement
19. Security Cia.. (Thi. Report)
None
20. Security Cia.. (Thla Page)
None
21. No. of Page.
94
22. PrIce
See ANSl-Z39.18
See Ins/ructions on Revef8e
(Formet1y NTlS-35)
DeperbnentofCo~ce
72 (4-17)
-------
EPA/ROD/R05-90/123
Wayne Waste Oil, IN
E'irst Remedial Action - Final
Abstract (Continued)
contaminated media, and quantified the chemical contaminants at the site. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil, debris, and ground water are VOCs including
benzene, PCE, TCE, toluene, and xylenes; other organics including PAHs and phenols; and
metals including arsenic, chromium, and lead.
c
The selected remedial action for this site includes treating VOC-contaminated soil using
vapor extraction; treating metals-contaminated soil using soil washing or .
sOlidification/stabilization; delineating the area of the municipal landfill; capping
the landfill and constructing a landfill venting system if necessary; covering
PAH-contaminated soil or consolidating the soil under the landfill cap; treating and
disposing of the contents of storage tanks offsite, steam cleaning, and removing the
storage tanks offsite; dismantling the incinerator and disposing of the debris offsite
or within the onsite municipal landfill; pumping and treatment of ground water onsite
using air stripping, or discharging the ground water offsite to a publicly owned
treatment works (POTW); monitoring air, ground water, and surface water; and
implementing institutional controls including deed, land use, and ground water use
restrictions, and site access restrictions such as fencing. The estimated present worth
cost for this remedial action is $5,582,499, which includes an annual O&M cost of
$291,000 for 15 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS: Cleanup levels for soil will be calculated using a
contaminant leaching model. Chemical-specific cleanup levels for ground water are based
on Federal MCLs and non-zero MCLGs including benzene 5 ug/l (MCL), PCE 5 ug/1 (MCL), TCE
, ug/l (MCL), toluene 2,000 ug/l (MCL), xylenes 10,000 ug/l (proposed MCL), and arsenic
o ug/l (MCL).
-------
tlx::tARAT.Iaf Fm 'DIE Rfu.KJ OF tB::ISIaf
srm to.M! AND UXM'Iaf
..layne Reclamati~ and Rec.-jclin;
Columbia City, Indiana
STATa4EN1' C1Y ~ 111m ~
(,
!his decision dooJment represents the selected ~; ;11 actiat for the W~yne
P.eclamation an:! Recyclin; (WRR) site develc:p!d in ao::ordanoe with the
:atprehensive Environmental Response, O:Irpensation an:! Liability Act
(CERCIA), as amended by the SUperfund ~ an:! Reauthorization Act of
1986 '(SARA), an:! the National Oil an:! Hazarda.1s SUbstan::es Pollution
Ccntin;ency' Plan (NCP). .
'!his decision is based upon the contents ot the admini.st:rati ve record for
the WPR site. 'Ibe attached in:!ex (Appen:lix B) identifies the items which
comprise the administnti ve record upon which the selection ot a remedial
action is based.
The State of In:tiana has concurred ~ the selected .=I-.ly.
concurrence is located in Appen:tix C.
'!heir letter of
A$ESSMENI' OF 'DIE SI'1E
Actual or threatened releases of hazardous substances fran this site, if not
addresse:1 by ~lementin; the response action selecta:i in, this roD, may
present an imn.inent arC substantial ermn;erment to pmlic health, welfare,
or the environment.
~Cfi OF 'DIE RD!ED'{
'!his final ~=I-.ly includes treatment of the principal threats posed by the
site by (l) utilizin; SOil VaPJr ExtractiCX1 ted'1ncloqies to extract an:!
treat vcc ccntaminants in soils: (2) soil washin; or iDlncbilizatiorv
stabilizati~ of lead-ccntaminated soils: am (J) extrac:tin; and treatin;
contaminated groun:lwater. In adiition, tank ccntents will be rem:wed an:i
treated. '1h8 DLmicipal lardtill wastes will be c::cntained uraer a ~
SUbtitle D landfill cap. PAH-<:cntaminated soil will be CXNered or
ccnsolidated under the DLmicipal lan:itill cap. 'the function of this l&£l-.Jy
is to reduc8 - th8 risk associated with ~ to the ccnt:aminated soils an:!
the soils' c:cnt:ribJtion to groun:lwater contamination. In addition, this
1 &£uedy will reduce the risk associated with 8)(pOSUre to contaminated
groundwater .
'!be major ~tA-II.eut.s of the selected ._I6Jy include:
o Install an upgraded security fence aram:l the Site
o Deed Restrictions to ensure protection of the tobUcipal
landfill cap
-------
2
o 0:Imt%uctia1, operation and maintenance of a Soil Vapor.
. Extraction (SVE) system in the VOC~ted soil areas
o Delineate and remadiate lead-ccntaminated soils. via soil
washin; or imncbilization;stabilization tec:hnolcqies
o Meni torm; of g'r'OJn:iwater and air
o O::r1stroction, operation and maintenance of a ~ter
extraction and treatmentldisc:haz,;e system
o
Delineate the extent of the Mmicipal Ian:!fill
I
d
o ~ion and maintenance of a RCRA SUbtitle D ~liant
cap aver the DlJnicipal landfill.
o O:wer PAH-c:cntaminated soil or exnsolidate un::!er !tJnicipal
landfill cap
o Remove and treat c:cntents of all a.bcve- and below grc::JUn:1
tanks: delineate the extent of a:::nt:aminatia1 ciue to spills or
leaks associated with the tanks.
o Rencve and dispose of site debris, includinq Cut net limited to
all tanks (abcve-, bel~ and partially buried), tanker
troc:ks, and the incinerator.
I:EX:tARM'ICfi
'!he selected .o:al-.ly is Protective of human health and the environment,
attains Federal and State ~ that are applicable or relevant and
appropriate, and is a:st~ffective. '!his ...,ucdy satisfies the statutozy
preference for rE!II8:1ies that Elrploy treaQDent that rMt~ tcxicity,
mcbili ty , or volume as a principal element and utilizes pet'manent solutions
and alt:elnative treatment technclcqies to the 1I8.y;....",. extent practicable for
this sitae
However, ~nse this ~~ will result in hazarc:b.JS substances (the PAH-
c:cntami.nate:! 8011) ~ c:n-site atxwe ~th-bued levels, as wall as
the lUUc:ipaJ.- I.m1till wasta ~ cn-site, a review will tie ~
within fiV8 Y88n after oo...._~-=l1t of ~ial actic:n to ensure that the
'" ~=Ilcdy 0CI'It:1m88 to prcvide adequate protectiat of human health and the
envircnment.
Date
Valdas V. Adamkus
Reqicnal
Reqion V
3 /~/q(J
,
-------
ICD.UGI C6 EB:ISIaf ~
~ ~~af AND R!L"'ic:LIH:;
I.
srm Ba\CXKI.K)
u
WRR is an approximately 30 acre sita, located a! tbI southeast ~ ot
COluneia City, Indiana (pc:p1lati~ approximately 6000) (Pi.gur8 1). 'Ihe site
incl\D!s apprcximately 20 acres an-rently owned Cy WRR, 6 acres in the north
which WRR sold to HolJres , 02tpany in 1982, am 4 acres ~ the west owned by
C01UIICia City. It is bounded ~ the south am east Cy the Blue Riwr am on
the west am northwest l:1j a cemetery am residential area.
'!be City well field is located ~tely north of the site am provides
drinkirq water to the citizens of COlumbia City. 'lb8 site (~ 2) can be
divided into ~ major areas: the scutheast porti~ designated as the
lower floodplain: t:b8 northeast portion designated as 81 old City lamfill
area; am the centml ard west portion, ~ as th8 uplams. . 'Ih8 lower
floodplain inclu:2s the areas which haw ~ identitier:1 as the "freshwater
pcI"C", "oil dec::anti.n; pit", "tar pit", "sl\.Jdqe ravine", "disoolOt'8:i area",
"t:uried barrel area" am "acid pit". 'lb8 old City lardfill which COlumbia
City operated fran 1953 to 1970, is in the northeut part of the site. Also
inclUCed in this area is the "ink sl\D;e area". '1be uplam area incl\D!s
the rOM inactive WRR office buildin;s an:! fI.1InI!rOJS tanks fran the oil
recyclin:;lreclamaticn operations.
u. SrI!:: ~ AND ~ ACl'IVI'l'IES
In 1975, WRR purd1ase:l approximately 25 acres ot lam ~ the SOJtheast edge
of COlumbia City, incluiirq a 13.6 acre portion that COlumbia City owned
since 1953. WRR ~ its divisiat, Wayne Waste Oil, t&;an cperatin; ~ oil
reclamation tusiness at the site jn 1975. In 1980, the In:!iana State Board
of Health (ISEIi) ts;an iJ'Iv8stigatin; tb8 WRIt sita as a result ot .~
fran a former WRR sployee 1:DIt ~ W8Stes W8r8 tein; ille;ally
~;~ of at the site. ISEIf d8temined that betwen Februa:y 1979 an::l May
1980, WRR filed hauler %'8pOrts statin; that it had ~;~.:eed. of 250,000
gallons of sl\D;8 at th8 Williams CD.D'lty lan:tfill in 8t;f8n, auo. However,
the lardfill had 1m receivec! arrj waste shipaent:s traD WRR durin; that time.
In 1982, WRR 8n:! c:ne ot its principals, Wayne Br:c:x:)t-rt, pleaded guilty to
illegal "depasitin; ot c:cntam:inants" an::l filin; false hauler reports. 'Ibey
were requirer::! tc pay a tine, to tun:) a risk ...---~ of the site, an::l to
pay for cleanup. WRR did not perfom the cleanJp requirer::! under its guilty
plea. .
In December, 1982, the WRR sita was listed on the Naticnal Priari ties List
(NPL). on July 10, 1986, ~tely 100 Potentially ~ible Parties
(~) entered into an Administrative order Cy o:nsent with u.S. EPA (tD:ket
No. V-W-B6~-o14) to CCI'1:b:t a ~ ICticn at the sitae BecIu88 th8
reccJVal was net satisfactorily c:xmplet8d, a TJnilateral Administrative order .
(Docket No. V-W-88-C-oOl) was iS$l~ to a smaller groJp of ~ ~ Febnw:y
17, 1988, requirin; them to ~lete the t'I!IICYal action.
-------
:2
FIGCRE 1
SI'IE I.OCATI~ 1O.P
(1
. O::.:ATJ?
"...iuill.-
~
.
WRR SIT;
INDIANA
~
n,o rth
SCALE: ~.. 10 MI LES
-------
. .-----
~"'"
CiTY
5\4- TIf.!ATMEHT
l.-J P LJ\Nr
~/
CiTy WELL.
~".?
.,
-
-
E ~oS
ROU""{___--.
IUlJ
No a~ I
~.&&. 'I
.... '1
L-.J
~ I'
t-~.. j-
Ot.
"
"
"
" "
_--1,-...... 1 r:
I - " " "
/" /' I: \ . ::
/ : : , ':
I _D or;:" I::"
' / ~--'''" :,
I " ; , ::
' II I "
/,1'11( V ", "
a~~Y - I 1fUHWi" , "
. R,., ="T£ L ' "-," / "
II tV I " , "
'I , '/ , "
' . - - '/, I. "
II --- - , >--:.-- , "
','I', -..... .,:~ 1J"'''''''Sf,.~.1 -\,- I, ',"~
~~~~.f< <:"" If., ~ L.
" --- J ~~-- \ :1
: .. .",... . "
: \ - -- 'Or'~ m :PA~; ~ - j,' i;
" ,~' u '.,~:.::.~< f19'.,7- :.
- - ( u. . ~-< \ W Q "
--------- ----- - u . \. '- I
- - - -', -, ," " '---<:. ------ '-~, \ .' , ~ , - "I
- " " , -- - '- . . . - -
.-- - - - ~; .1: \j=:\ a-~----:]"~-,~:.,~Jo. \ ..... :~. ::
I I , , I' , ,"' ~ - - , , ..", I ---. . .'
" II ~ '.' JA. , .
" ", " ."''''''0'"' 4)'" 11, t "
' ", I -- ""
'. I", '" ....«r.... ", 6CANr""3 II . ..... ~ It
' , I . .1 w'~-., -, "- . ,
@' I :""-. v-... "----- ~ I
" . "I, -s;, , . ,~--. , :
.. II " .. ',\ ,/ JI -. pOr / ,:
.. I " \ I \'=' "" - / "
" GCAK "I" ~. "----___~I --;/ 1'-, .: '.
,'or ". \ "'" -... ,---, ";:-- <'" - '.
" ," \ '.~O/ll \-----', I :'
. , I' . _"A . , ,~- - - - '. I
' , I' . -- ~ , " "
' " , ;:;-" 'Re. "
.. I~j I '-.. '-I :: '--lHfOlJ~O " .." ,~/)
'I I "\ -U 'LI I' ,.... II
. I' -- " d ~;:.-. "g....., ""
~-- -- I /: , :u :,~, L" '::~---' ---- ----~:. \:-
.,- "No', '.. / ,Q I " >- .\
' , I --', .. ~" , , /' "
" " 'dOK 00 ... '-- ;0', -. L~ 'AH". "I L .1" .",,'8" "~<5'" ~J II
' " ", 0 0 IE , '---, ---- ""'~"!!Jill "-::'-", ---" 1 .A"~", " ,
-~' , , ,- --, , . - - " .
" " ~ 0 . - -".,. ---- , '-- , "
", ',-- r--_<~:~, ------~~~-- '----- ...< "
..... " '- -- --'-. -- ---=-- .
'-----, L- -----_J '----- -----=----==- - ~ . .
----------- - - --.: --- --- -- -
-- E A1VEA.-
----- . -_._~!-~- u_- "
.------.
f: LLS WaR 1'"
SlREE1~
,
,
..
~
-
' -----
' ...... --
, - ----
,
_J
---""
. 7..A
I \'l \
~,
R. E c:.' "!) EM"'t IA.l
A.REA.
J{~S'DEH"t'
AR E '"
,",wo RY'
OVNOo4
~'T~ /!J
CIT'C
CEN\~"R"(
A
t
"~"
\ I
-
I::
).
0-<
Z
f'1
,.,
f'1
~
t-'I
H
a
z
'"'1
H
c;)
c:
,.,
f'1
~
,.,
f'1
n
0-<
n
r-'
H
Z
c;)
tV
(J)
H
t-'I
M
~
-------
4
On August 14, 1987, U. S. EPA entered into an Adm:inist.rati ve Order by
Consent (I::cc:ket No. V-W-87-c-018) with aver 100 PRPs to a::n:hJct the RI/FS.
'r.'1e RI was CCIIpleted in June, 1989 an:! the FS was exmpleted in January,
1990. .
t" . S. EPA anticipates sernin; Special Notice Letters p.lrSUant to Section
122 (e) of SARA to apprcximte.ly 260 ~ in April, 199.0. A "geed faith
offer' to cx:n:u::t the remedial design am ~ial actiCl't shculd be received
by the kJercy 60 days after issuance of the ~;"1 notice letters. tUri.rq
this 60 day negotiations periocl, u.s. EPA is subject to a moratorium on .
c::cn1uctin; remedial action acti vi ties at the site. t1pc::n issuance of the
special notice letters, u. s. EPA will begin ne;otiatin; with the PRPs to
conduct'the remedial design an:! remedial actiCl't ni_'""Md in this R8c:x)rd of
Decision.
n
In. CDMJNr1Y REIATICH; HISltm'
u.s. EPA PJblished the P1.~>OSed Plan in acxx::Irdance with CERC:IA Section 117.
!his document an:! the Feasibility Study were made available to the PJblic on
January 22, 1990, at the begimirq of the 30 day PJblic ~'Tt periocl. A
PJblic meetin; was held en February 7, 1990. ~tely thirty-five
people atterdecl the PJblic meetin; an:! expressea their ccncerns. O:mnents
received durin; the cx:mnent periocl, whid1 ended Febtuary 21, 1990, an:l the
responses to those o:mnents are ccntained in the Respa JSi veness SUnInary
(Appen:tix A) .
rv. SCDFE AND R:>IE OF '!HE 1&;.KftSE AC!'Iaf
'!be ~, under the c:1i.rection of the u.s. £PA, have already initiated two
rencva.l I"eSpaI'1Se actias at this site. Rsacval activities ~ the 1986
Administrative Order by C'onsent incl\X3ed EDCCaVatiCl't an:! off-site ctisposal of
a~roxima.tely 7500 tens of contaminated soil in the "oil clEc:antinq pit",
"tar pit" an:l "sludqe ravine"; reID:IVal an:! off-site ni ~ of the c:i:::lntents
of 215 55~lon drums an:! soil frail the ''tIuriecl barrel area" an:l subsequent
bac:kfillin;. Back:fillin; remains to be &:r-. in the "oil dec:antin; pit",
"tar pit" an:l "sl\Jdqe ravine". Remcval activities under the 1988 Unilateral
Administrative Order inclu::Jed excavatiCl't an:! off-site di~ of
~rcximately 5400 ten; of contaminated soil fraD the "diCZOOlored area",
"aci:: pit", "ink sludg8 area" am "sludg8 ravine"; I'1!IIII:JYal am off-site
ctisposal of an actUticnal US drums; n!!IICVal and ott-site d;~ of the
contents of 23 hariza1taJ. tanks; fancilY; of the "oil dec:antin; pit", "sludge
ravine", an::! "t4;-OOlored area"; an:! bac:ktillin; the "acid pit" and "ink
sludqe area" with off-site borrow.
!his R:)D addresses ccnt:aminated soil an::! ~ter in the lower
floodplain an:! uplan:! areas of the site; ~ SUbtitle D closure
~ts for the old COlumbia City landfill; and ~/clearvrelD:lVal of
the remainin; tanks and debris whid1 pose a threat to human health and the
environment. 'Ihese areas were det.e.minea to be a principal threat at the
site because of the potential threat of ciirect CXI'1tact with the seils an:1
the soil' s ~ct on the ~ter. '!be a::ntaminated ~ter is a
principal threat at the site because of the potential for c:1i.rect in;estion
-------
(,
5
of ~ t.hrcu:;h DUnicipal arK:! privata drinkin; water walls. '!his is
the third am final response acticm fer this site. .
v.
SI'I!: ~c:s
'!he RI was c::cn:mcted under the directiCl'1 of U. s. EPA arK:! II»! to determine
the nature and extent of ccntaminatiCl'1 CI'1 the WRR site. '!he field
activities were c::cn:mcted in two phases. Fhase I field activities were
ccn:!ucted at the WRR site between Febroary 22, 1988 arK:! March 24, 1988.
R1ase II field investigations were ccn:iucted between July 25, 1988 am
September 13, 1988. Field aspects of the investigation in::l\Xied: 1) .
surveyin; am ~in; the site: 2} CXII'1duct:in; a sl1~aoe inv8stiqation: J)
excavatin; test pits: 4} canst%Uctin; 1IICI\it.arin; walls: 5} collect.irq
representative scmples of surface soils, surface water, ~;"."It, ani
c;roun:iwater: and 6} CXII'1duct:in; aquifer tests.
'Ibe WRR site is located on top of ~taly 200 fest of ura:tlSOlidated
glacial materials whid1 overlie a shale an:! dclanita bedrock. 'Ihe glacial
materials are primarily c:utwash deposits c:cnsistin; of altematin; layers of
san::l, silt anr:l silty clay. 'Ihe RI i.nt.cpret:.ed the ~~lor;y beneath the
site to be separated into two aquifezs: an ~ water table aquifer, arK:! a
lower CXlnfined aquifer. Hcwever, the c:rcss-secticns presented in the RI
in:iicate that the "semi~inint. layer is net CXX1t.imcus ~ the
site and may actually be a series of san::l, silt and silty clay lenses.
Givan this uncertainty, the interpretatiCl\ of two separate aquifers my be
:incorrect. 'Iherefore, the followin; ~~loqic rt;-'~ion will be
presente::1 .in tenns of one aquifer with an ~ zcne and a lower zone. !he
upper zone is currently net known to be use::l as a water supply scurce, but
the lower zone is the majer water rescurce fer C01Ul7i:)ia City and the
surrcuniin; pcpUatiat. COl\mi:)ia City's DlJnicipal wJ.l field is located
adjacent to the northern limit of the east half of the WRR site. Of the
three wells located in the City's well field, two (Wells j7 arK:! j8) ~ used
alternately by the City to keep the two city water t.cwez:s fillecl. Well #8
p.mps at appraximataly 1500 c;allons per 1Din:ta (cp) ana is located within
100 feet of the site. Its location is shewn CI'1 Figure 2. Well'7, with a
~in; capacity of ataJt 1200 gpII, is lccatad aI:a1t 600 fest northeast of
well '8. Beth walls puIII) ~t8ly 8 to 10 hcurs per day.
Grcun:!water flew in the upper Za18 is trcm WBSt to east. In ~,
grcuxlwater 18 ~ to the west of the site, ana flews tcward the Blue
River. 'n'18 Blua River flews ala1q the eastern and scuthem bcurdaries of
the site.
In the lower zena, the regiCl'1al hydraulic c;radient .in:tic:ates that natural
grcuxlwater flow is fran northwest to saJtheast, and thus 1!NaY !ran the city
wells. Hcwever, when the city wells are p~, tIcth the hcriza1t:al arK:!
vertical hydraulic gradients reverse. Im'inq the ~;,,' Investigation a
~ test was ccnducted to better c:haractarize th8 aquifezs and d8temine
the relationship between the IJA)er (a::ntaminatecl) zena, the lcwer zcme and
the city wells \lhic:h ~ the lower zcne. Attar 8 hems of p.mpirl; in the
lower zone, the gradient beneath the site in:tiaJteS that gran:lwater flow is
fran SOJth to north - tcwaJ:d the city well field. OJrrently, the
-------
6
intensity of' the reqiaW. gradient to the 5a.1theast is higher than the
reversed gradient beneath the site caused by p.mpinq. In additiat,at
current water demands, the city wells are utilizecl less than SO percent of
the time. As a result, the overall gndient is away fraD the city well
field. However, projected in::rea.sed water demands for Q:)l\JDt)ia City (two
new sub:livisions with city water/sewer have recently been developed south
and east of the site) may require the city wells to be- p~ DCre
trequentJ.y. Incraasea PJq)inq ccuJ.d c:ban;8 the overall tlOll dirw:tiat in
the lower Zen!. .
Results of the RI, which was finalized in JUne, 1989, are SUDIIIarized below.
In additi~, analytical X'8SUlts for groundwater, soil borings, surface soil,
~;mA"1t and surface water are surmnarized in Tabl- 1, 2, 3, 4 .a 5,
respectively.
o
SUrface soils in the area of the 'shcctin;J ra.n;e (S8-l8) are
c:::cntaminated with polynuclear arc:matic ~ (PAHs).
'%he highest levels of volatile cm;anic soil c:::cntaminatiat were
detected in the sa.rthwest area of the site &lay; the Blue River
(SB-7jK\19 and SB-40/!'M,4S); in the northem pcrtiat of the site
west of the old City L1ndtill; and the sazt:heast comer of the
site. '%he major ccntami.nants are chlorinated ethenes and to a
lesser extent, chlorinated ethanes, toluene and a.lJcanes.
o
o
'n'1e majority of groundwater c:::cntaminatiat is caused by
d'llorinated ethanes and occ:urs in the same general lc:x:atiat
as the volatile organic soil c:::cntaminatiat. '%he City well is
~leted in the lower zone and when P'~ creates a dcwnward
gndient fraD the ~ c:::cntaminated zme. OJrrently, the lower
Zen! is net c:::cntaminated
o
Magnesium, ~t+m;um, c::hranium, ~~, zinc, and lead were c:1etec:ted at
levels above the ran;es CXIr1Sidered to 1:8 0< .'...:41 in "natural
soils. n In general, the elevated l8Y8J.s of these c::x::qx:unds
coincided with the areas describEd abav8 for the volatile cm;anic
c::x::qx:unds. HcweY&r, c::I18 ~y isolatacS ana of CXI1S1derably
high c..._I~Gtia1S of these elea&nts (partia1larly lead) was
detect:ea ~~i1Mtely midway betaen the "tresneter pcni" an:!
the ncrth8m ban!azy of the sita (SB-17/SB-17A). In additiat,
investi9atiaw in 1987, by the Technical Assistance Team (TAT)
and the ~ Respa!S8 Team (ERr) fcurd elevated levels of
lead in the a:ntents of fc::ur vertical and three hcrizattal tanks,
located just west of the WRR. office, and in the surro.zn:1inq soils.
Resul ts of the TAT 5i!Iq)1inq indicate tha~ the levels of lead fa..ni
in these tanks causes the waste to be ~ c:haracteristic.
CCncentrations of inorganic pi!U'8JDStars in surface water and
~; 1ftaI"Jts traD the Blue Riwr adjacent to the site were net .
significantly above these upstream traD the site bo.mda:y, with
the possible EOO..""eption of ~ and zinc in aar1i1NlY1ts. A slight
increase in cyanide cxn:entrations was ~ adjacent to the
o
-------
7
TAmE 1
St.M!ARY OF ~ AN.\USIS
~
RANGE: OF Ut:U,\,;11:,U
o:n::entrations*
u;jl
Volatile organics
c,
,
4-Met:hy1-2-Pentancne NI>-2 . 2
Aceta'le NI>-270
2-EUtancne NI>-23
~'.ene NI>-7
Cartx:I1 Disulfide ND-2. 3
Chloroethane NI>-1
Chlorofom NI>-12
1.1~d1l0r0ethene NI>-92
1,1-Dichlorcethane ND-630
1. 2-ol.d1lVL'. or, . ANI NI>-8. 4
EthylJ:enzene NI>-1
Tetrachlaroethene NI>-27
1, 1, 1 ~ichloroethane ND-ll
Trich.loroethene NI>-25,000
Toluene NIr3 , 500
Total ~lenes NI>-28
Total-l,2-Dichloroethene NI>-56,000
Ccis- & trans-1.2~d1l0r0ethene
Vinvl Chloride NI>-5, 500
S&ILi. -Volatile Organics
2,4-Dimethylphenol
2-Methyl;i1enol
4-Met:hyl~
Benzoic Acid
Benzyl Alc::cbol
Diethyl~ta
Di-n-art:yl~te
bis (2-Ethylhlxyl) Phthatlate
lsophorone
Napthalene
R1enol
NI>-170
ND-54
ND-120
NJ>86
NI>-2
NI>-26
NI>-82
NI>-160
NI>- 2
NI>-420
ND-6
SDlA'
~
u;jl
S~
~
u;jl
CUTE:RIA
EX(~I-~] JED
NE NE
NE NE
NE NE
5 0 YES
NE NE
NE HE
100** 'RE
7 7 YES
NE NE
5(P) 0 YES
700 (P) 700 (P)
5(P) 0 YES
200 200
5 0 YES
2000 (P) 2000 (P) YES
10000 (P) 10000(P)
70(P)+ 70(P)+ YES
2 G YES
NE
NE
HE
NE
HE
HE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
-------
8
TABU: 1 (0:I'1tinai)
StHWti OF ~ ANALYSIS
cx:Jo!RXJN[)
RANGE OF Dt:u:~J.1:;U
~~~tias*
u;/l
Inarganics
Aluminum
Antim:Iny
Arsenic
R!II...;um.
Cadmium
calcium
C'lranium, total
Q:X)aJ. t
~
C'janide, total
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Man;anese
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
'Ihallium
vanadium
Zinc
~30,200
~32.7
NI>-57.1
NI>-1870
ND-5
48,100-276,000
~17
NI>-5.1
ND-34
~264
ND-10,400
~12
77.9-74,600
ND-1,370
~3.8
ND-37,300
~2.2
ND-4.1
11,200-134,000
ND-2
ND-6.5
ND-79
SDQ .
M""r .
u;/1
HE
HE
50
1000
10
HE
50
HE
1300 (P)
HE
HE
50
HE
HE
HE
HE
10
50
HE
NE
NE
HE
StJolA
tC.G
u;/l
CRITERIA
~CFrnED
HE
NE
HE YES
5000 (P) YES
5(P)
HE
100 (P)
NE
1300(P)
NE
NE
O(P)
NE
HE
HE
HE
50 (P)
NE
HE
NE
NE
HE
* Ranqe PI 5 Bn't81 includes both dcwn;racti8'1t and landfill c;rcundwater
mcni torin; walls.
(a) Sate Drinkin; Water Act May; 1ft 1111 0:rJtaminant x.v.J..
(b) Safe Drinkin; Water Act Ma)t;JI'I1m o:nt:aminant: Level t--h:.
(P) denotes ~. ,",:ee.1 ~.
(c) Water ()ali~ Criteria fer protectiCl\ ot human health trc:a
~CI\ ot water (far 1C>-6 risk).
HE - Not Established.
ND - Not Detected. DetectiCl\ limits presented in Tables 5-1, 5-2 and 5-3.
** ~lies to the class, total TrihalClDethanes of which chlorofom is a
1IAN ~.
+ ~lies to Cis-1,2-dichlorcethene a Cr.~'\ Q'1eJtt of total 1,2-dichlorcethene
-------
9
TABLE 2
StHS1\RY OF SOIL B:mN:; ~IS
Minimum Maximum
Concentration Concentration
Chemical'* (uQ/kq} (uQ/kQ)
Volatiles
Vinyl Chloride 8 8
'" He~hylene Chloride 7 310
Acetone 1.3, 13,000
Carbon Disulfide 3 14
1,I-Dichloroethane 2, 490
Total 1,2-Dichloroethene 1. 82.,000
Chloroform 2 36
2-Butanone 5 81
1,I,l-Trichloroethane 2" 9 ..600
1,2-Dichloropropane 70 1,600
Trichloroethene 1 83.000
Benzene 2 4
Bromoform 4,700 4,700
4-Hethyl-2-pentanone 27 27
Tetrachloroethene 1 5,400
Toluene 22 59.000
Chlorobenzene 24 24
Ethyl benzene 2 1,200
Styrene 3 3
Total Xylenes 14 4,300
1.1,2-!richloroethane 2 2
Semi - Vo lat il es
Phenol 240 240
4-Methylphenol 210 210
Naphthalene 78 3.800
2-Hethylnaphtbilene 83 24,000
Acenaphthene 1, 100 1.600
Di ethyl phthil ate 23 23
Fluorene 1, 300 1..900
Phenanthrene " 41 . 18,000
Anthracene 89"0 4,100
Oi-n-butylphthalate 56 29,000
Fluoranthene 46 28,000
Pyrene 44 24,000
SutylbE"zylphthal~te 21 ,000 21. 000
Benz(a)anthracene 1,300 13,000
Chrysene :,400 13,000
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 76 140,000
Di-n-octylphthalate 85 950
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 65 11. 000
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 65 11 ,000
Benzo(a)pyrene 1,300 12,000
Indeno(1.2,3-cd)pyrene .90 8,100
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 560 E.8C~
~ibe~zo:w=;';. 2,:00 2.200
-------
10
TABU: 2 (CXNl'INCED)
StJMM1;RY OF SOIL IaUN:; ANAUSIS
Minimum Maximum
Concentration Concentration
Chemical* lue/lea) ~
,\
Pesticides/eili .
.
4,4-00£ 27 100
Endrin 19 19
4,4-000 57 57
Aroclor-1248 230 230
Aroclor-1254 640 640
Aroclor-1260 1,400 1,400
Minimum Maximum
Concentration Concentration
Metals ~ --1!Dg&L
Aluminum 1,570 22,600
Arsenic 1.5 36.4
Barium 8.2 516
Beryllium 0.23 0.91
Cadmium 1.2 109
Calcium 1,180 195,000
Chromium, total 3.7 254
Cobalt 1.9 20
Copper J.9 6,890
Iron 4,350 171 , 000
Lead 2.4 7,790
Magnesium 90S 42,700
Manganese - 34.3 1, 460
Mercury 0.028 0.4
Hickel 4.6 300
Potassium 197 12,300
Selenium 1.5 4.5
Silver 0.2 ~.8
Sodium 429 3,120
Thall ium 0.2 1
Vanadium 5 35.3
Zinc 17.6 3,000
Cyan i de , total 2.7 111
-------
11
TAmE 3
SUMMARY OF ~ SOIL NW..YSIS
'.- .. '. . Frequency of HinimwD . . HaximulD
.,
Detection Concentrat1 on..';'. Concentrat i on
Chemical* ~ ~ ~
. Volatiles
10tal 1,2-Dichloroethene 1 .19 19
Chloroform 5 ' '6 22
Trichloroethene 1 6 6
Benzene 1 . 3 3
Toluene 1 72 72
Ethyl benzene 1 45 45
Total Xylenes 1 310 310
Semi -Volat i 1 es 21,600
2-Methylphthalene 1 21,000
Phenanthrene 1 23,000 23,000
pyrene 1 1,400 1,400
Butyl benzyl phthalate 1 140 140
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 5 77 16,000
Pesticides/PCBs
Ga!l1na-Chlordane 1 420 420
Aroclor 1248 4 150 3,400
Metals (maIko) im9LW
Aluminum 6 1,900 12,900'
Arsenic 6 4.9 19.3
Barium 6 20 291
Beryllium 5 0.22 0.91
Cadmium 6 1.3 695
Calcium 6 2,030 146,000
Chromi um, total 6 12.5 4,290
Cobalt 6 1.3 14.3
Copper - 6 3.5 221
Iron 6 4,920 104,000
Lead 6 13.8 265
Magnesium 6 2,360 90,800
Manganese 6 131 2,140
Mercury 1 0.1 0.1
Nickel 6 7.1 525
Potass i UBI 6 568 1,090
S 11 ver 5 1.9 . 13.8
Sodium 3 777 4,400
Tha 11 i um 1 0.49 0.49
Vanadium 6 6.7 122
Zinc 6 95.3 62,800
Cyanide, total 6 30.4 1,920
-------
12
TABU: 4
SlMO.R'i OF SEI>IMDlI' ~IS
Frequency of MinimUII Maxi ilium
Detection Concentration Concentration
~* !IWL.:...lli (uo/~o) (uo/ko)
Volatiles
Vinyl Chloride 1 270 270
1,I-Dichloroethane 2 '.33 1,300
Total 1,2-Dichloroethene 5 3 1,100
Ch 1 oro form 3 3 16
2-Butanone .2 8 39
l,l,l-Trichloroethane 1 3 3
Trichloroethene 3 4 44
Tetrachloroethene 2 . 5 7
Toluene 2 150 210
Ethyl benzene 3 3 33
Total Xylenes 2 5 48
Semi -Volatiles
4-Hethylphenol 1 86 86
Ci-n-butylphthalate 1 27 27
bis(2-ethylhexyl}phthalate 10 50 220
Pesticides-PCBs
Aroclor 1254 2 160 290
Aroclor 1260 1 200 200
Meta 1 s (maIko) (maIko)
Aluminum 18 2,210 9,920
Arsenic 17 2.3 19.7
Barium 18 21.3 80.1
Beryllium 15 0.29 0.85
Cadmium 7 1.3 2.6
Calcium 18 32,600 104,000
Chromi UII, total 18 6.7 39.5
Cobalt 18 2.1 7.1
Copper 18 11.8 247
Iron 18 5,950 22,500
lead 17 3.3 374
Magnesium 18 6,400 30,400
Manganese 18 209 629
Nickel 18 7.2 24.4
Potus i um 18 390 1,410
Silver 7 1.1 1.8
Sodium 1 1,110 1, 110
Thall ium 1 0.95 0.95
Vanadium 18 8 27
Zinc 18 21 397
Cyanide, total 18 4.36 66.4
-------
13
TABU: 5
~ OF SURFACE WM'ER ANALYSIS
(a)
RANGE OF Ut:n~.:.LUI 96-HR »Q:. CRITERI.A
c:a-tFaJND a:N~as* ~. AOJI'E./c::HR:NIC ~t'T'F'I')ED
u;ll \qIl u;ll
volatile organics
Methylene O1loride ~ 99,000 33,000 I 4,950
1, 1-Dic:hloroethane NI>-66 160,000 NE lNE
Total 1, 2-Dic:hloroethene 1-1,600 140,000 NE lNE
SEmi-Volatile Orgcmics
Diethylphthalate ND-O.6 . 110,000 940 I 3.0
Di -n-butylti'1thalate ND-O. 2 73 940 I 3.0
Pyrene ND-O.1 NE NE lNE
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) ti'1thalate ND-O. 6 69 940 I 3.0
Irm'ganics
Aluminum 51.9-331 NE 750 / 87 YES
Arsenic NI>-8 NE 360 I 190
Barium 46.4-105 NE NE lNE
Bezyllium ~1.1 NE 100 I 5.3
Calcium 39,900-129,000 NE NE lNE
ecwer ND-18.1 NE 42 I 26
cyanide, total 20-315 NE 22 I 5.2 YES
Iron 97.4-4,070 NE NE lNE
Lead ND-3.7 NE 262 / 10
Magnesium 14,500-32,000 NE NE lNE
Marqanese ND-2,070 NE NE lNE
Nickel ND-8 NE 3079 I 342
Potassium 2,190-43,100 NE NE lNE
SOdium 4, 130-277 , 000 NE NE THE
Zm: 20-315 HE 2S4 I 230 YES
* Rarge pres e.nted c:cnsists of data fraI1 pc:n:)s am river water semples.
(a) 96-hr LC-50 traD J'c:m:nal WPCF, J'une 1982.
~ - Clean Water Act Ambient Water ~ity criteria, established for the
protectia1 of aquatic life, based a'1 evidence of tcx.ic effects to fresh-
water organisms resultin; fran acute am c::hra1ic exposures.
NE - Not Established.
ND - Not Detected.
-------
14
o
sita as ~ to ~ cn--,L.-Clti~. ~tia1S of
~c parametars (partiOJlarly cyanide) in cn-site surface
waters wre elevated in the wetlard north ot the site, "s11.Xll;e
ravine", an:1 "oil c:Iecantin; pit. II Volatile arganic o......t-~ in a1-
site !lUlt4iments were elevate in th8 ~ 8UrtaQ8 water locatia1S
previaJSly ment.icnsd, an:1 in the "tresbwatar pcn:i."
Althc:u;h this was not di_'~~9d in t:h8 RI, th8 old City Ianttill
lacks ~iata CXJYer to 8nSUnt ~1ianc8 with RCM SUbtitle D
regulatias. 'Ihe limite Wexmation ~ the waste di~
practices imicates that largely DlJnicipal 8alid waste wu
di~ of at the city lan:1till. Hcw8Yer, a:inimaJ. amcunts ot
hazardous substances may have also been di ~ 181 ot at the
laJ'ittill. Given the WRR owner'. slq:py di~ practices an:! the
fact that he request:.ed pemission to di"..... ot sluage material in
the lanclfill in 1975, it is V8%y liJcely that SQD8 waste frail the
WRR site was also c:tisposer:I in the 1an:ft1ll. In tact, the "ink
sludqe ana" is located in an area beli8Yld to be part ot the
DUnicipal lanttill. PUrthemcre, durin; 8alYation ot waste in
the "sl\Xi;1e ravine", solid waste was enccunt:erec! as excavation
P1' ,,--i.aQ northward in the ciirection ot t:h8 DlJnicipa.l lan::!fill.
'1hese facts lead the Iqercj to ccn:J.\Dt that SCID8 wastes frail the
WRR site ware di~ ot in the DUnicipallanc!till. 'Ihe lan1fill
boundaries have not been clearly defined, turther c:Ielineation of
the lanclfill will be c:::cn:!ucted durin; the ~i ~ design.
VI. ~ OF SIT! RI.SRs
I)Jrinq the RI, an analysis was c:::cn:!ucted to estimate the human health or
envi.ramentaJ. risks that COUld result it the CCI1tami.nation at the WRR 5i te
was not cleaned up. '1his analysis is .~ ..... 4u.y refC'%'8d to as a baseline
~ \ss-~ (QJapter 6 ot the RI Repart.). In a:n:hJctin; this
.:IC!~~~, the fQOJS was on the health effects that COUld result frail
direct ~ to the ocntaminants as a result ot the soil CXII1in:; into
c:xrrt:act with the skin, or treat c1irect ingestion ot the soil. 'Ihe
~loC'ti--w1t also tt'Jt"ll.c on the h8a1th eftects that COUld
result traD in:1estion, inhalation, or c1ir8ct d8maJ. a:ntact with the
CXI'1taminated 9'%'OJndwatar trcm a DUnici 1'1 or dr1nk:in; water wall ('l'able 6).
'!he Pn'pOS8 ot an ~ ae~---"'~uL is to analyze the pot.entj,aJ.
adverse h8aJ.th 8tf8Cts, bXh QIt.w1t, m1 tutura, ,.,'-C by hazardcus
substance ra1---- treat a 8ite it IX) acticn W8Z'8 tak8n to ccnt:rcl or
mitigate these reJ."sas. 'Ih8 8Stjate risk a~iatacl with the soil an:!
9'%'OJndwat.er were cI8valcpec1 nuc on the "%'8SCnable 118.";-111 ~..
EDCpeCted to oa:ur urD!r both aJ1..VjI~t m1 tuture larxI-use c:xntitia1S, as well
as the tcxicity ot the CXI1taminants fc:uc at t:h8 sita. '%his methcc1 is
inten:tec1 to estimate a CCI1SelVative expc:B.1r8 case that is stiJ.l within the
range of POSSible ~.
The risks a~soc:iated with ~ to CXI'1taminants t:hra.Jgh the aI:x:Ma
pathways were determined usin; mathematical ~ 15. 'the ~, S calOJlated
an ~ dose in Dq/Ja;Iday for both dUldren an:1 adults Nwed on an
.
-------
15
T AILE 6
SUlaART OF CARCIIOCEIIC AID IOICARCIIOGEIIC RI51
YATIE IECL~TIOI AID IECTCLII'
100CARCIIOGElIC SUICIIROIICCb) IlAZAID IIDICEs'd)
MEDIA PATMWAY MAX AVG CMEMI CAL ..
SURFACE SOILS DERMAL A8S0RPTI01I 3.05 0.19 CYAIiIDE
IIiGEST 1011 0.32 .......
GROUIIDWATER IIiGESTI 011 1.21 0.01Z VIIIYL CIIL.
(MUIIICIPAL DERMAL A8$ORPTI01I ........
WELL USERS) IIiMALATIOIi 2.100 0.041 VIIITL CIIL.
GROUNDWATER I IIGEST 1011 8.Z0 0.16 VIIIYL CIIL.
(PRIVATE DERMAL A8S0RPTI01I T CE AIID
WELL USERS) IIIIIALATIOIi 16.0 0.3Z 1,Z-DCI
suasURF ACE DERMAL A8S0RPTI01I 1.61 0.51 PC8, CTII.
SOILS IIiGESTIOIi 0.30 ........
IOICARCIIOGEIIC CIIOIICC,) IlAZAID IIDICES
"'EDIA PATMWAY "'AX AVG CMEMICAL ..
GROUIIDWATER I IIGEST I 011 1.Z0 0.1Z 1,Z-DCE
(MUIIICIPAL DERMAL A8S0lPTI01i ........
WELL USERS) IIiNALAT 1011 2.30 0.Z3 1,2-0CE
GROUIIDWATER I IIGEST 1011 7.93 0.10 1,2-0CE
(PR I VA TE DERMAL A8S0RPTI01I .......
WELL USERS) INMALATIOII 15.0 1.50 1,2-01:1
CAICllaGEllC IISI(C)
MEDIA PATHWAY UK AVG CHEMICAL ..
SURFACE SOILS DERMAL A8S0lPTI01i 2.ZE-02 2.1E-02 PAM'
IIiGESTIOIi 1.5E-04 1.5E-04 PCI
GROUIIOWATER IIiGESTlOIi Z.3E-03 Z.4E-05 VIIIYL
(MUIIICIPAL DERMAL A8S0RPTIOII 2.5E-06 CMLORIDE
WELL USERS) I IlNALATI 011 6_4E-04 5.9E-06
GIOU8l1)WATU INGEST! 011 1.51-0Z 1.71-04 VIIIYL
(PI I VATE DIRMAL AISOIPTIOI 1.11-05 1.11-07 CIILORIDE
WElL USEn) I.MAUTtOll 4.21-03 4.01-05 'TCE
SUISURFACE DIRMAL AISORPTIOI 5.3E-aZ 3.3E-02 PAN, Pel
SOILS I IGESTI all 9.6E-04 6.0E-04 'AUElIC
.. Indic.te. t~e c~..;~l ~ich CGntr;auted .o.t to the lI.zerd Index (III) or Carcinogenic
lisk vIL~..
(a) Chronic - lefers to a L...-ter. exposure (i.e., 7 year. to Llfeti..)
(b) Subchronfc - Refer. to a reLativeLy short-ter. exposure (I.e., 2 weeks to 7 years)
(c) Carcinogenic Risk' The risk of developing cancer. A risk of 10E-04 (10-10) indicates a
probability of , chlnce in 10,000 of an Individual developing cancer.
(d) Mazlrd Index - The potential for non-carcinogenic toxicologicaL health effects. A
hazard index ar.ater than 1 indicates that it ia likely for individual. to experience
adverse heaLth effects.
laTE:
The e.pre'llon 2.0E-02 cln ILIO be written I' 2.0 . 10-2. loth oi t~.'1 I.presllons
state that two additional person in 100 have the £n1c£I of developing cancer over a
Llfeti.. If exposed to the potentiaL carclno,enic che.icil.
-------
16
TABU: 7
ASSOMPI'Icm Ft:R 0IaJIATI~
OF 'IHE
EXP:SJRE ta;ES
Body Wei9ht ()cg)
Aa1U'
(21-70)
70
AOOT~
(6-20)
'ltaU:R
(o-S)
57
14
Water CcnsI.mptia\ (lId) 2.0
Inhalation Rate (m3!hr) 1.3
Skin SUrface Area (cm2)
for Water O:ntact
2.0
1.0
1.3
1.4
18,200
18,200
6,030
Skin SUrface Area (cm2)
for Soil Contact
3,890(a)
1 x 10-4
9, 650 (b)
1 x 10-4
NA
Soil In;estiat (Ja;jd)
NA
Max.ilmJm Soil AI:;o. - tlation
on Skin (mvcn2) 1.5
1.5
NA
(a) Assumed for ocnst%ucticn ~rker: head, axms and hares e'
-------
17
TABU: 8
~ AND AVEFN:2. EXPOSURE ~as
FOR '!HE WRR INDICATCR OiEMICAS
Aa~I- of
Slto Calldltl-
"'rtrft
F",we
'",uro
'",we
surf- SoHo
r......... of 1..ldeftti to
Cont _I N t «I Gl"OIrdooet or
Fr- IU\lclpol weill
Gr.......urD
r----o ., C_tP'\.CtIOft r....- of 1..ldlfltl to
WOrtO" co COftt_iNt«l COftt_iNt«l Gr"""'ttr
Soill an.Slto fr- 'rl..lu'welll
£......- 'ottlwy
r.,..... ., T.......oen
co Cont_lnot«l
SoHI an-Slto
...dl""
So.DIurfeel Sollc
G~to.b
CuD/ira)
aWf'8t8
ha,ta)
llul-
hall'
Awr...
fUltlL)
llul-
(~)t.,
A_'"
(\JI/k.'
llui-
Cua/l'
Awn..
(ua/l}
Ooto reprowentotlOft
llul-
l!'dleltor o..-teel
VI",I (IIlerl.
lID
lID
Z8
0.1
8
8
'87
2.0
',2-0Ichloroothenl
(toul)
20
"
Z80
Z8
12,000
'70
1.170
"7
T,lcfllor08tll«w
]90
47
130
0.2
as ,000
73
667
1.3
Tol-
520
120
18
0.02
59,000
'70
lZO
0.13
bll(2-etllyllluyl)
pfttllliito
16,000
"0
0.1
0.1
"0, oao
380
5.3
0.67
~rc Il'I09tf1l c
po I 'J'ft.C I eo'
Ir_tlc
h,.:lroel"'"
14,900
,74,900
lID
110
n,900
4.7 . 800
lID
lID
(toul )d
'ol~lortNttd
btgll.."ll
(toUI)
3,400
2.040
lID
lID
2.270
2,270
10
lID
Ca2li""
~
7'00
~
2
~
~
0.03
0.03
110
2
0.2
0.2
Iletll
530
14
0.2
0.07
300
'5
'.3
0..7
(IIr_;""
(toUI)
4,300
15
0.09
0.09
250
12
0.6
0.6
Ar,...;e
'9
1
0.3
0.04
36
9
2.0
0.27
ItN:
63.-
..
0.4
0.01
3,000
56
2.7
0.53
C,...IOI, 10UI
',920
26
'.3
0."
",
12
8.7
1.2
~
.
S_eft 01 eIIU fo' tllll 1_""1 pot""" IftCllo8I8d -foee loil ,_1ft eollectl'Cl _i", .......s , ."" loil 110.'''' '._10' It 0 to
2 fftt 080111 eollectl'Cl OJ"" '-- , or..s 2. SlftCO III Of t1>8 11I"ocl ,oil '_I.. ....1 colloctl'Cl fr.. I _ll ..r.. Of 1111 WU
Itt., Oftl, ,oil IIOrl", ~t. we.1 \lied for ...-etrle .... eolelllltl_. .oll~ .11111' for Ilell l!'dleltor ell..lell ".0 OOtl;~
,.- IUlllr lurfoel er I_'OCI loll _t8.
I>
It....t "01.... fr- ,r"""'". "to coUected .,1,.. ...,. , - 2 - .ol8C'tl'Cl. t- ..h.. .... tll... _It Iplled tPf 0
dliutlOft foetor of 1/200 (1UIlelpol -tor 0..1,) or..s IISO (..,.....tl ..oU _tlr) to ..tl..." c_...trotl- ""tCII ..., OCC\lf' It
poiltU of 'OC""OI' eOfttoct. lofor to sectlOft 3 fOf' Oft oap4_tiGft of tllo dlilltlOft foetorl.
"OI>8tt .01.... fr.. loll IIOrt", doU It oil _ttll coUectl'Cl vi", I..,. , ..., 2 .... ,,'ectl'Cl.
I",L~ onl, e~ c\I,.lft.s II II~ or PD80lbll II~ Clrcl"09«"1 ~ III. I~I'.~II~' A9.-cv for '..llrell on Clrc~r.
volllli for I~"I C~ "'I ,~ .'tllin oeell ._11.
-= ' ,.." OIlecuc
-------
18
assumed frequency of ~ Crable 7) to indicator chemicals. Of all the
c:x::I1p:JImds detectec1 at the site, thirteen indicator d1emicals were identifie:j
as the ~ Which will best l'epresent the c:N8rall risk to PJ,bl:lc
health. 'Ib! average am ma.y;".~ ~ were "sed upon averaqe an:!
~;J'IUm contaminant ccncentraticns of the indicatcr d1emic:als at POints
where exposure cx:IUJ.d ~ crable 8). Results of the risk JII~s---nt for
~ter and soil are briefly suzmnarized below.
~~,.
The major cxmtaminants of CXIrX2rn in the groundwater were 'I'ric:hloroethylene
('!a) and vinyl c:hloride. 'Ia: and vinyl c:hloride are volatile arqanic
~ that are knam.to cause c:amer in laeoratcty ~;1IIa'!II am are
therefore classified as carcinoqens. . 'Ia is a highly D:1bile contaminant
that typically migrates thrcu;h the soil into the groundwater. .
!he averaqe ccncentraticns of 'Ia: and vinyl c:hlcride fcun1 in the
~ter beneath the WRR site resulted in a amulative --, lifetime
cancer risk of 2 x 10-4. In adctition, the may;"."" a:noentratia'1S of 'Ia: an:i
vinyl c:h.loride fcun1 in the groundwater beneath the WRR site resulted in a
CUIm.1lative e.vr-, lifetime cancer risk of 2 x 10-2. '1be 1qercy considers
the risk ran;e of 10-4 to 10-6 to be protective of human health an:1 the
environment. '1be probability of an individual develcpinq cancer aver a
lifetime if exrosed to these chemicals is above the 1qercy's gcaJ. risk
ran;e. 'therefore, qiven the highly D:1bile nature of these ccntam.i.nants an:i
the potential for contamination of the DUnicipaJ. well field, remediation of
the contaminated ~ter is ~~.
In addition, the hazara indices for vinyl c:hloride and 1,2 Dic:hloroethene
are greater than one for many of the 4!)CpOSure scenarios. '!his i.ncticates
that there is a potentia]. for adverse health effects if an intividual is
exposed to these cxmtaminants in the groundwater. .
~
'!he major CXI1"Jtam.inan of a::n:ern in the soils were polynuclear araDatic
h~ (PAHs) am Polychlorinated b~ls (PCBs). PAHs am PCBs are
also classified as c::arc~. PAHs t:ard to be ralativaly i.mcbile
c:xrn:.aminant. that will typically remain in the soil for lcnq periods of
time. '!he l~ of PC:aI tcum at the site an b8.1cw the Agency's
esta.blishea cl88n-Up levels of 10 I:pD fer r8SidentiaJ. areas ana 2S ppn for
in::!ustrial ar8U.
SaJr;Jlinq of the a'2-Site surface soil fcunr:1 that average and 1!Ia.Y; JDJm
ccncentrations of PAHs resulted in a amulative e.-~ lifetime cancer risk
of 2 x 10-2. '1be ~c sub::hraUc hazara in::1ex for the maximum
exposure scenario is greater than awe
In ac:iii ticn, the VOC-c::art:aminated soil sezves as a scurce for CCII'It:irJued
~ter ocntaminatia1 abcve health~ levels. Althcu;b the AYOess
lifetime cancer risk J119SOClated with VCC>-C..d04minated soil is below 10-6 for
direct contact or inqestion, the VOC-c::art:aminated soil CXI'1'tin.J8s to 5e%Ve as
-------
.19
a scurce ~f grcun:!water a:ntaminatia'\. Given the highly 1!Cbile nature of
the voc ocntami.nants, ~i "tia'\ of this soil is T--"'=uy to De protective
of the c;rcun:twatar.
ActuU or threatened releases of ha.zarcbJs substances !ran this site, if not
addressed by the preferred altamative or cne of the ather active --cures
considered, may present an i:aminent an::! substantial f!I'XSanqerment to ~lic
health, welfare, or the envi.-'Mlaut. .
Municiml Ian:ifill
As n;c:t"!'~'Md in the Site C1aracterizatiC21 sectiC21 of this RD, n;~
practices in the JllJnicipallandtill ~.,. to haY8 1:Ieen mainly solid waste
durin; the period of cperatiC21 be.'bJeen 1953 ana 1970. However, durin; this
pericxi of time, qiven that laws W'hidl regulate the "'i~l. of. hazardcus
waste were net in plac8, it is likal.y that small amc::unts of hazardous
substances, and pema;. even ha.zarcbJs wastes ware "'i ~ of in the
lan::ifill. In additicm, the WRR owner's interest in n;~in; sl\d;es fran
his recyclin;J cp!1'at1cn in th8 JllJnicipallandtill ~-u that ~inq in
the mmicipal lan::ltill also ocr:urrecl after 1.975. 'Ihis is ~ by the
fact that the Dadt.ori:1; well (*-12s) located ;~; "tely dcwn;raaient fran
the mmicipal lan::ltill is a:ntaminatad with vinyl chloride at the M:L an::!
1,2-Dic:hloroethene abcY8 the M:L. 'Ihe clcse prcacimity of other "';~1
areas suggests that all of these areas, includirq the JllJnicipal landfill, .
are c:cntri1:utin; to the a:ntaminatiC21 of *-12s. Alt.hcu;h vinyl c:hloride is
peIVaSive thrcu;hcut the site, m:nitorin; wells ;1IiftM;ately up;radient do
not in:licate levels of 1, 2-Dic:hloroethene al::IoYe the!CL. Finally,
literature whid'l has reported C21 the nature of CCI1taminants in ~ter
emittinq fran m.micipal lan::ifills iniicates that there is a hazardcus
~ to the leachate (Br:cwn an::l Ccnnelly, 1988).
VII. tESCmPl'Iai OF ~
Based a'1 the fi.n:tin;s in the RI "'~ L, the follcwin; rc-rlial actiC21
objectives were establisbed far the WRR site to ensure protectia'1 of human
health an:1 the enviJ:c.~L:
~~J:t.,.
o
Minimize pctential tL1t:ur8 risk to public health fraD CXI"ISUIIpticm
of a:ntaminated grcun:lwater.
O..ut..-J. migrat1cn of a:ntaminatad grcun:lwater to the Blue River water
an:1 ~;-'1t. .
o
o
p.:wiI- miqraticn of SI v.1l"face soil CCI1taminants to the
grcun:!water
COrTt.aJr\ina~M Soil
o
Minimize risk to public health an::l envira1ment traD the direct
ccntact with PAM a:ntaminated surface soil.
-------
20
o
P-"~ IX'tent:ial fer ercsia1 an:! transport ot a:l'Jt.am.inated surface
am .'J--1Jrface soil to the Blue RiV8r.
MuniC;~1 ~ill
o
Ensure adequate cxwer is ~ ! ant to prevent 81"08ian an:! ~JSUre
of waste resul tin; in direct a:nt:act er wasb::ut to the river.
SUrfa~ an:! SUbsurface Tank!; an:! o:nt:.ents
o
Eliminate potential mgratiCl\ of tank c::art:8'1t8 to surface an:!
!IiII 'bsurfaoe soil an:1 c;rcun:iwatar.
n ..... -I E1~-lls
'!here are seven r--1; -1 actiCl\ al te.J:natives which haV8 been develc:piIQ to
address the a:l'Jt.am.inatiCl\ at the WAR sitae ~'Vt<'l tar the "No ~a1n
al tematiw, all of the alte%:natives new bein:; exnsidered tar the site would
include a filmPIer' of p ..... rt () .'\ ~. Al tarnatives 2 thrc:u;h 7 include
rem:wal and/er treatment of the tank ccnt:.m1t:s an:1 R::RA SUbtitle D ca;pin; of
the DlJnicipal lan:1till in accordanc8 with Stata of Intiana sanitazy lan:1fill
closure requirements. SOil an:1 c;rcun:iwater in the vicinity of the tanks may
require adcti tia1al irJvestigatiCl\ to delinMte the fIXt8'1t of a:l'Jt.am.inatia1
due to spills or leaks "cu;OC"iated with the tanks. It is ".m1fNld that
adcli tional soil er c;rcun:iwater a:l'Jt.am.inatiCl\ ~l.ld be ad.h. -~ in a similar
manner used in other areas of the sitae
A large amount of debris, includinq the tanks JIIII'1tiawd above, is scattered
thrcughcut the site. 'Ihese materials sho.1ld be evaluated an:! these
detemined to be solid waste am be a::nsolidated an:1 pl~ under the
mmicipal landfill cap. Tanks an:! tanker trucks deteminsd to be
cont.am.inated with hazardcus waste shall be cleaned ar d;~ in
ao::crdanca with ~ 40 c:nt Part 264, 9,q.rt J ard u.c Rule 24. en:. the
ccnt:.m1t:s of the tanks have been rt!DICY81, the tanks shall be staam-cleaned
prier to rem:wal tram the site. If the incinerator is det:eminea to be
ccntaminated with hazardous waste, then it shall be d; -Pltled an:! d;~
of in aa:craanc. with ~ 40 c:nt SUbpart 0 an:1 IAC Rule 29. If the
di~ntl81 1n:in8rat.cr is d8temiz8:l to be a solid waste, it can be
ccnsolidata:! urD8r the DUnicipallandfill cap ar recycle, as ~~iate.
Each alte%:natiw also in::l\D!s ~ter extract:iCl\ and treatment to
health-"-sed l8Y8ls, K:tGs and/ar H:Is. IaI:J-t.am c;rcun:iwatar Dl:lnitorin; in
CCI11;)liance with the requinments of ~ SUbpart F, 40 c:nt Sect.ia1 264.100
will be c:x:tr"rlI~ed to gauge the effectiveness of the selected 1.---:1y. In
aeXliticn, erosic:r\ a:rrt:rol prcvisicn; an:i deed ~~icticn; far protectiCl\ of
the DlJnicipal larCfill cap are required.
It should also be nctecl that the VOC~ted soils at the WRR site were
fani to be sufficiently siJD.ilar to R:RA-listed waste to make R:P.A relevant
ana ~~iate. .
".
-------
21
I.ead-ccntaminated soil was foun:1 in the vicinity of,'SB-17 and SB-17A. In
adc1,itien, high levels .of lead were also fourd in the diked tank area at the
westem en::! of the site. Previcus t.est:in; of the tank ccntents indicate
that the waste is ~-characteristic due to lead. Althcu;h this
ccntaminatien ~""S to be localized, the extent of r--ii~tiCl'1 of this
area will be dete.nnined based en aati tia'2l scmplin;durin; the remedial
design. '!his uncertai1rt:y :ae.y result in a slightly higher a:&t for the
alternatives, if the area of o::I'1tam.i.natCl'1 is laJ:98. ~;,.tiCl'1 of the
lead~ted soil will be adU.....a by either soil washin; or
~ilizationlstabilizatiCl'1 technoloqies. Final determinatiCl'1 of the
~rcpriate technoloqy will be made by u.s. EPA an::! will be bas81 CI'1 reSults
of treatability stu:ties. .
A m~ detailed r1ic:t"'l;.g.c:iat of the ~ijll] actiCl'1 alt.ematives is presented
below. COSts, inclu:ii.n; annual operatiCl'1 and maintenance. (O&M), for each
altez'native are also provided. All cxsts and iJrplementatiCl'1 times are
estimated. .
A] ~.#O~~ive 1: N:) ACl'Ial
capital COSt: $0
Annual o&M COSt: $0
Present Worth: $0
Time to IIfi)1ement:: NeD!
'!be SUperfun:1 PI~.cmI" requires that the "no acticrt" alternative be
evaluated at every site to establish a baseline for oarparison. Under this
alternative, u.s. EPA waIld take no further actia'1 at the site to prevent
exposure to the soil an::! grcundwater c::cntam:inatiCl'1.
AlteI'native 2: ~ ~al AND AIR ::»"DCJ.l"t'J..I'G,I CDI.1I!mIC PM-
~ s:JrIJ5/ CAPPDG ~ s:JrIJ5/ J!KSIal CXIfIR)IS/ IEm
~.u
-------
22
'!he PN!-ocntaminated soil will be CCVered to prevent the incidence of
denial ccntact. VOC-ocntaminated soil will be ~ in acccrdance .with
RC&\ SUbtitle C closure requ:irenents to prevent the incidence of dtmnal
contact an:! reduce CD'rtaminant miqratia\ to the ~ter via
Wil tratian.
In adcli tion, these elements P1 5 S enta:J in the S8Ctian entitled "~ ..... "J
Elements" are incl\.Dll:1 in this alternative.
Alternative 3: GR:XJNI:K\Tm EXmAc1'ICIf AND AIR ;:s~.u«:;j 9:)JI, PlI~ WI'IH
'mEAm> ~ CD'JElmC ~ OOIlJ;/ J!K'SIaf CDmms/ IEED
RE::iD
-------
23
grc:um ~ace. '1he air emissia1S will be treated to' health-based levels.
'1be SVE ani ~ter extraction systsII& will cprate in CXI'1junction for
~rcximately 15 years to meet the clean-up criteria. .
'1be PAH-a:m.aminated soil will be CXJYered to prevent the incidence of
denial contact. In ad:lition, these elements presented in the section
entitled 1I~&1a1 ElSll!l'rt:s" are incl\ZB:i in this alteI'native.
Al~~tive S: ~ ~ AND Am ::fJ.KU't'.J..lIa/ EXCAVATIaf AND
BIOIOOICAL ~ OF ~ SOIII ~ ~ .
&>IIS/ fXSIaf a::tmI)IS/ tEED RES'mICl'ICJfS/ ~ C\PP.DG JDaCIPAL
IANDFII.lI RfXJIJE cnmNIS OF ABJIJEXaXK) AND ~ ~
Capital COSt:
Annual O&M COSt:
Present Worth:
T:iJ1e to ~lE!l!&'1t:
$7,988,170
$ 279,000
$9,927,114
15 years
To reduce the operatinq time for the ~ter extraction am treatment
system presented in Alternative 2, ~tely 30,000 cubic yards of voc-
ccntaminat.ed seils wculd be excavated am bio1oqically treated on-site.
Microorganisms, n.rt::rients, am oxyqen would be SlJA)liec1 to the c:cnt.am:inated
soils to prcmx.e transfonation ani aerd')ic bio1oqic:a.l degradation of the
voc contaminants. '1be area available to OOIElit..\JCt the treament facility is
not large enc:u;h to ao~ ..... .jate all of the c:cnt.am:inated soil at one time.
'lberefore, the exr:avatia'\, treatment am badcfillin; cperaticn; \Ialld need
to be staged. It is estimated that soil treament ~a take ~ to four
years.
Sin::e this alternative involves the excavatiat ard pla~'1t of voc-
ccntaminated soil, the ~ Ian:l D~l Rest:ricti~ (UR) (40 em Part
268) wcula be invoked. 'Iherefore, the a:&t estimate a~c:nmac: a min:imJm
t.echnoloqy disposal unit waac be c::cnst:ructed prior to ~; ~l of the
excavated am treated soil.
'!he PAH-
-------
24
c::cntaminated soil \IO.LlcS be incinerated cm-site usin1 a DCbile infrared unit.
Basm en an average process rate ot 14,000 lb,lhr, the i.ncineratia1 process
wculcS be c:arpleted :in apprcx:imately nine to twelw JIICI1t:hs. It is estimated
that the grcurdwater extractia1 system wcW.cS cperate tor apprcximately ten
years .
For ccst.i.nq p.lt'pOSeS, it is =a1:C!lM-d that the incinerator. ash wculd not be a
RC:RA hazardcus waste and BILIZATI~/STAB.ILIZATION.
'nUs section n; !I:CI'C'~9S the performance ot the preferred altemative against
the nine criteria, nct.in; how it a:q:sres to the other opticns under
oonsideratia1. .
Analvsis
-------
2S
()yer:IIll ~~i,..,. All of the alternatives, with the ~a1 of the "no
action" altemative, ~d provide adequate protectia1 of human health am
the enviramlent by eliJninatinq, reducinq, or '--lL..\Jllinq risk. t:hrcugh
treatment ar en;ineerin; ~ls. '!he preferred alternative \IICUld treat
the volatile arqanic CXIntaminants in the soil and graJndwater, o::Ner the
PAH~ted soil, a%:d cap the 1ILD'\icipal landfil~ to reduce the risks
associated with direct cart:.act and ingestia1 of a::.ntaminated soils an:;Vor
graJndwater .
8ec:ause the "no actia1" alternative is net protective of human health am
the enviramlent, it is net ccnsidered turther in this analysis as an option
for this site. .
~l iance with ~. All alternatives wa.1ld 1IEIet their respective
a~licable or relevant and ~riate requirBDBnts of Federal and State
environmental laws. S:in:8 the preferred alternative \IICUld net involve the
excavation and placement of waste, UR \IICUld net be an ARM. Hcwever, all
options ~d involve the relevant and ~iate ~ requirements.
Di.scharg'e of the treated grourCwater to the Blue River \IICUld 1IEIet the
State's ~ disc:harge limits. No waiver fraD ARARs is r--~ to
iJlplement arrr of the active cleanup optiaw. Soil clean-up levels will be
established to ensure that aJnt.aminant lead'linq into the graJndwater will
net exoeed health-based levels, ~ or !CIs.
LcrI::I-te%m effect.i vel and ~P'WJ!!fICe. ']he preferred al t.ernati ve \oIO.1ld
reduce the inherent ha..zarCs posed by the VtC-c:cntaminated soil and
grourCwater t:hrcugh treatJDent. SVE wa.1ld De an effective method to reduce
contaminant levels in soils because the primry CXIntaminants are VtX::s, which
are effectively treated by SVE. In ad::1itia1, the soil cr:::Ner aver the PAH-
an:! VOC-c:cntaminated soils \IICUld eliminate the direct CCI'1tact threat
associated with these areas. Reacval of the tank a::ntents \IICUld eliminate
the potential for ad::1i tia1al a::.ntaminatia1 of the surrourdinq soil and
qramdwater due to leeks or spills frail th8 tanks.
AlteI71ative 3 \IICUld also be effective in redlJcin; site risks. However,
potential cr:::q:>licaticns with soil tlustUn; are the \4&tL..""ls required to
lower the water table to irCuce upward ~ents frail the lower Za1e, W'hile
at the sam8 t.i8 flush soils atxwe th8 water table. In adr::litia1, the
hetero;Jenea8 nature of the soils in the SOJtheast area of the site may
cause the draiNIg8 gallery to badaJp and discharge to the surface.
Alternatives S am 6 \IICUld effectively rCuc:e site risks t:hrcugh treatment:
howeVer, land,.:ti ~ 1 of the treated material or ash may require lorq-
tam O&M.
Al ternati ves 2 an:! 7 \ICUld eliJninate the direct CX'I1tact threat: hcwever, the
inherent hazards of the waste '-'O.lld remain and CD'Itin.Ie to CCI'1triJ:ute to the
voc ccntamiMti.cn in the grcurDBter. .
'Ibe Dmicipal,lan:!fill cap arC graJndwater m::mt:crirq system will require
lcn;-teIm o&M for all alternatives. Alternatives 5 am 6 are the only
-------
26
alternatives' that WOUld actively treat the PAH-ccnt:am.inata:! soil, fer all
other alternatives these soils WOUld be ocnsolidat:aci un:1er the amicipal
landfill cap er a:wered. Since the DlJnicipaJ. landfill cap will nquire
lonq-term O&M for all of the alternatives, CCI'1t.a.inDent of the PAH-
contami.nata:! soil instead of treatment will net increase the amamt of lon;-
term O&M for Alternative 4.
/ ,
=~~.~ C:U~'o7'~;r~~ ~ tm~I~~~t
of VOC-ccnt:am.inata:! soil to reduce t:.axicity, mcbility, or wl~. 'Ib!
preferred alternative an:l alternative 3 waUd :1nvalw treatment of the VOC:.
contami.nata:! soil via SVE er soil flushin; in CCI1junctiat with c;ram::!water
extractiat an:! treatment.
Al ternati ves 5 an:l 6 WOUld invol V8 bioloqii:aJ. tz'8tmnt: or incineration that
WCUld pemanantly dest.~ the VOC an:l PAH CCZ1taminants. 'Iba treata:! soil or
contami.nata:! ash might need to be t4; c;p.~ of in a RCRA landfill.
Alten1atives 2 an:! 7 achieve no reductiat in tcxicity, mcbility, or wlume
for the VOC-ccnt:am.inata:! soils.
It shcW.d be noted that althaJgh the cap CMIr the 1lmicipaJ. landfill an:1
PAH~taminata:! soil does net affora a reductiat in tcxicity, mcbility, or
volume throJgh treatment, it WCUld significantly reduce infiltration an:1 the
prcductia1 of leachate that cculd migrate off-sita. In adctitiat, the PAHs
are relatively iDDCbile in the soil an:1 therefore will net pose a
significant threat to the c;ram::!water.
Shcrt-t-~"" effect:.i~ . 'Ihe preferred altamatiw and Alternative 3
would require approximately 15 years to adlieve the c;ram::!water clean-up
levels. AlthaJgh Alternatives 5 an:l 6 \Ia1ld aau8Y8 c;rcundwater clean-up
levels quicker, beth of these al tematives require excavatiat whid1 WOUld
pose saxe shcrt-tem risJc:s of expost1t'8 to VOCs durin; the excavation
pr--=s. In adctitiat, rainfall infiltratiat will A'-.t certa:inl.y occur
during the ocnst:ructiat pericx1. 'Ihis cculd incr&ue the migratia1 of
ccntam.iJ'Iant: in the c;rcundwater. GrcuI1water cl8ln-Up levels WOUld net be
achieved for 30 years for Alternatives 2 am 7.
~ 'Ib8 ilI1ividual tachnclcqi- c:18scriI:81 far 8ICh of the
alternatiws-&1"8 a:I'1Yentic:nal am W8ll dmo..t.-atai. 1fcw8v8r, there is sane
a:ncem 0Y8r t:b8 tectm1cal fMSibility of Altamatiw 3 c;iwn the
~"WCU8 nat:ure of the soils. O:rJv8rsely, the preferred altetnative,
Whid1 involwa SVE has been fcurd to be feasible far VOC-ccnt:am.inata:! soil
in a variety of soil cx:n1itions an:l has been !III-'1"tully demamt.-cat.ed in
u.S. EPA's SUperfund Inncvative '1'echnola;y Evaluaticz (SrI!:) P~~.Q!I1.
No unusn,., difficulties in the placement of th8 soil ~ am1ll.1ni.cipal
lan:1fill cap are anticipata:!. However, qiwrt the close P%'CDCiJDity of the
PAH-contaminata:! soil to the DUnicipallamfill the feasibility of
ccnstructing two caps is questionable. It my be mare appl"¥Liate to just
:i.:x=:pcrate the PAH-o:1ntaminated soil urD!r the amicipalJ.amfill cap.
'this can be CCI1Si.dered because the PAH-a:r1taminate:1 soil has net been
-------
.27
. d.isccvered to be a R:RA-listecl waste.
!q)lEmantatiat of Altamative 7, partiC11larly re;arc1in; the di.sd1arge of
effluent to the PaIW, wculc1 require th8 ~- Mlt of Q)l\Bia City ~ use of
its PaIW. In aatiticz, (kulI1Uy ther8 .ua a cpI8ticn of available capacity
for the treatJDent plant. Finally, lack of a l-'I--b._bDient pt~awand
general UT~ tainty regardin; the statu8 of the PC71W maJces iJlplementation of
a disc:harge to the PaIW ~l..
~ 'n1e present-wcrth ccst of the pre.fernd altemative is $S~582,SOO.
!he lowest-c:cst altemative is Altemative 3 at $5,UO,800. ~ mgbest-
cost altemative is Altemative 6 at $U,322,2OO. AltematiV88 2, 5 anj.7
have ~resent-worth ccsts of $S, 483 ,700, $9,927,100, am $6,386, ooQ.,
re;.-pecti vely .
RegaJ:Ui.n; the cappin; of the PAH-a:r1taminat soil i.nstead ofin::iDeratien,
given the prcducticn of a::I'1t.am.inatea ash c:turin; incineratiat, the Telatively .
smUl volume of material ani the imJrj:)ile nature of the PAH-c::a1taminated
soil in it's pt ~sWJt state, CD1ta.inment is th8 m::&t ccst affective method of
rem:win; the direct cx:ntact threat ...-.....; at.ed. with this area.
State a. ~ - -lance. 'Ihe State of Indiana Department of EnvircnmentaJ.
Management supports the preferred al t.emative.
t"nmnrutv ~l.an::e. O::ImIJnity ac::ceptanc8 of the preferred altemative
has been evaluated, and '-Ie have dete.J:mineQ that no m::dlficaticns are
~'MIY as a result of pJblic ,~....~. 'Ihe t1es;:-msiveness $1~ is
included in ~ A of this Record of Decisiat and aa1resses all
c:x:mrents received durin; the 30 day I~ ....-,t peric:d.
DC. 1HE ~ J8'1 ~I":J J ~
'!he preferred altemative for cleanin; up the WRR site is Alternative 4 -
~ EXmAel'Iaf AND ~/ s:m. VUt:R !XIRACl'Iaf AND ~ OF
EFFIDENl'/ c:IMmlC ~ SHlS/ !KSIaf CDfIKJIS/ IEI!D
!
-------
28
~tc': A ~-.,~UID of ~18S" (EPA, Oct.cbar, 1989).
'n1e VOC-or::rJtaminated soil will be ~ i ~ted USinq soil vapor. extraction
t.echnolcqies. 'Iba vapor extractiCl1 \I8lls will be p1~08d t.hrcu;ho.tt the site
in these areas W'hich ~ th8 soil cl&an-q) l8Y8la for VCCs. SbaUd
invest.igatic:ns in the JllmicipaJ. lan:!till area or tank areas reveal VOC-
CX'r1taminated soil, then the soil vapcr extractiCl1 syStem shall be ext:erD:d
to incl\XSe these areas. Soil vapor extractiCl1 will ccnt..inJe until the soil
clean-up levels for VCCs are met. VciticatiCl1 ot th8 soil clean-up will .
oc:x:ur thra.r;h soil bore S21q)linq an:! analysis trc:a th8 grcund surface to. the
top of the water table at th8 ti8 ot 8iSq)linq. Siq)linq methcds shall be
desigr1lj!d to ensure min:iml less ot VOCs durin; th8 Si!lq)lin; 8Y8nt.
VOC~ted soil clean-up levels shall be c:ala1lated for: . benzene,
1, 1-didlloroetJ1ene, 1,2-didll~, ethyJbenzene, t.etrachJ.oroethene,
1,1,1-tridlloroethane, tridllaroethene, toluene, cis-1,2-didlloroethene,
1:nms-1,2-didlloroethane, an:! vinyl d1l0rid8, at a min:im.=. Finalization of
this list shall be ~letea durin; ~i~ design.
Metal (specifically lead) CX'r1taminated soil/sl\D1e shall be tested for the
d1aracteristic ot EP toxicity (40 en SectiCl1 261.24) usinq c::un-ently
aR'rcve::i testinq met:hcColo;;y at the tbD8 ot th8 analysis. 'I!x:Ise
soils/sludqes fan! to be RC:RA cMract:.eristic shall be ~iated usin; soil
wash.in; or imrcbilizatiCUVstabilizatiCl1 technolcqies :in order to ren:ler it
non-d1aracteristic. Treatability stuaies shall be ccn:b::ted in order to
determine the DCSt appropriate treatment technolo;;y tor these CXI'Itam:inant..
Final detetmination of the treatment tedmolo;;y will be made by the }qercy.
Secause the extent of lead CX'r1taminatiCl1 remains unclear, aO:titicnal
~lin; will neec! to be ccn:b::ted :in the vicinity ot SB-17 and SB-17A and
the diJced Vf!rtic:al/horizantal tank areas to cIetemine the tx:Iun:2ry of lead
contamination :in ~ ot the clean-up l8Yels. 'Ibis uncertainty may
brpact the final r--1i ~ actiCl1 cost. .
PAH-contaminated soil as g&nerally de.t1ned :in Figure 2 shall be ccvered :in
order to eliminate th8 di.r8ct. 0CI1tact threat. '!his can be ~tJlished by
either a soil ccver or o..liMoIlidatiCl1 urdar th8 !tJnicipaJ. lazx1fill cap. 'the
aerial extent: ot PAR CX'r1taminatiCl1 shall tie det.eminei1 thraJgh scmplin;
durin; the ~i "1 design.
~ SUWtl, D CAe
'!his sanitazy lan:!till cap will be designed :in ~liance with ~
SUbtitle 0 (40 en Section 257) ard State ot In1iana (329 IAC 2) Solia Waste
Lan:1fill closure requirements. A gas v8l"1t.inq syst8D may also be rec;uiz'ed
to relieve pressure due to gas bUldup beneath the cap. '!his issue will be
addressed in more detail Cturin; the ~ial design pw.. '%he ventinq
system WCUld need to be c:cn:sc:uct:a:I arxl cp&ratad :in a manner that ensured it
did net present a risk to human h8al th or tha envil.... _d;.
waste W'hich is CUU.W1tly unccvered or ~ fraD the lmttill \ICUld be
ccvered :in the o:::urse ot regradinq the surface. A min:im.= wcrJdn;J face will
-------
'AIAMETn
AlIIIGn i a (II II)
ChLoride
SuLfau
A L UIIi nUll
Arsenic
CadaiUli
Copper
Iron
Lud
ThaL I iUII
Zinc
Cyanidl, toUI
Vinyl Chloride
Total.1,Z'Dfchlorolthlnl
Trichlorolthlne
1,1'DichlorOlthanl
bia(Z'Ethylhlayl)Phthltlatl
TltrachlorOlthene
Z.Propanol, 1'[2' (2'Methoay'
1'''ethylethoay)'1-MlthylethoayJ
Furln, Tltrlhydro. [4J
Whole Efflulnt TOlietty
Acutl Toalcity (TUI)
Chronic Toaicity (TUe)
29
T AILE 9
DISCHARGE LIMITS TO THE ILUI RIVIR
FOR THE TREATED EFFLUENT FRo.. WRR
Applicable 'er.it Li.itationa .
in ugll
AY£IAGE
1801-
GIU
1,400
218,000
221,000
180
0.23
2.5
26
985
12
9.4
24'
5.0
104
21
21
22
24
22
2,800
50',000
514,000
419
0.54
5.8
61
2291
21
2Z
560
12
261
54
54
59
51
56
m
[1J, m
[1J
[11
m
m
[1]
[11
[31
[31
[3]
[3]
[3J
[4]
[4J
Report
Report
Report
Report
[5J
[5J
[1J The Ibove.notld para..tlra arl intlndld to be analyzed by a teat ..thod which wiLL measure tne
Quantity of acid.aoluble ..tal prlaent, howlver, an approved anelyticll ..thod for acid-soluOle
.etal la not Ylt aVlllable. Thl per.ittll ahalL ..aaurl Ind rlport thlll parl..tlrs as total
recovlrabll ..tal untfl a tIlt ..thod ia approved which ....urll acld.lolYbll ..taL.
[2] The Li.itltionl for Irllnci Ire bal~ on protlctln, thl ualrl of the rlcliving atrelm from the
Clrcinoglnie propertiea of Irsenic at 10- rilk Llvll. Thl LI.itltiona, howlver, Ire bllo~ the EPA
..thod dltection LI.it C.oL) for Irllnfc Ind ..y be below thl 880ilnt background LlvlL for arsenic
in the rlceivln, Itrl".
The MDL for arllnlc ulfn, I'A ..thod 206.2 (&A, furnlcl) fa 1 Ut/l. Thl per.fttel wilL bl
conlidlrld In cQ8Plilncl wIth the '-"1 liattatlon If Irlenic fl nevlr detlCted in thl effLuent
lbovl the 1 u,/l MDL llwel. Aft Iltlrnltl clal-.~fflc MOL ..y be uaed ff thl per.lttee cln
de80natratl thlt t~. 1 Ut/l llvll II not achllvlbll beclual of ..tria effectl. Thl par.ittee must
de.onltratl thlt aweh Ictlon II wlrranted In IccorCSlncl with thl procedurll apaclfled under
Appendfa I, 40 eF' 'Irt 136, ualn, thl 80It aenaftfvI approved lnalytfcll ..thod.
The blckgrQUftl llvIl for Iralnfc In Indllnl aurflcl Wltlrl varlla fr.. '-5 u,/l. If the
cln de80nltratl thlt thl 880ilnt llvel of Irlenic In thl rIce I V in, atrea. ia conlitently
than the llaltatlon lapeaed above, the par.lt ll.ltatlon ..y be inerelaed to reflect the
blckground llvIl In thl rlcliving atrll..
permittee
higher
Imoient
(31 The ll.itatlons for the above.noted c08PQunG8 Ire baled on thl application of thl federal
treltment require..nta for the Or,anic Oh..lcll, ,t.at;cI, and Synthetic Flberl Cltegory. If the
plrMittee can dl80n&trare thar it ia not econoaically feaaible to inlt.,. tr.lt..nt which is
clplble of Ichilvln, the noted tf8itacionl, altlrnatl trllt8bfllt~ ll.,tltfona ..y be dlveloped.
(4] At thfa ti.. toalclty dlt. ia not IVIIlabl1 for the noted eoapounda, thlrlforl, li.itltions
Ire not proposed. If, In thl futurl, dltl bee...1 availlbil which would Indicate the Levels of
thele c~ Dein, CSiachar,ed are unaafe, thIn li.itat;ona ..y be dlvlloped which insure that
the receivin, Itrll. ia not being adveraely iaplcted by thl dilchlrgl.
(51 The units for thl rlportlng of thl wholl Ifflulnt toaiclty Ire TUI (100/LC10) for Icute
results ,nd TUc (100/NOEL) for chronic reaultl.
-------
30
be maintainSd durin; surface ~ in order to minimize the potential
aiI1;:)orne release of CXI1tami.nant.S. '!his will ensure that \WOrk CXIIpleted at
the site wulcl be cIcne in a """"""" that 1«:UlcI JIIinj",j.. ;isks to "'>dcers an:! .
neamy residents.
As a Pre.lbninary design task, borin;s shall be c:xn:!ucted in order to
detemine.the larxlfill's lateral bamdaries.
~b!" ~ction and ~~
A ~ter extnctia1 system shall be c:p!rataa until ~ter (1)
mets MC:lsJM::t.Gs for c:arc~ Where the ICtG does not equal zero; am (2)
is less than or ec;ual to a 10-6 c:::Lmulative -. lite-tjme cancer risk; arc
Mas, MC:LGs, or a hazard in:!ex ot 1.0, Whichever is DCre st:ri.ngent, for
nonc::arcinoqens thrc:u;bazt the site. ~liance DaUtcrin; shall oa::ur at
MW-14s, ltIo1-9s, MW-Ols, MW-04s am ~10s in order to ensure that the clean-
up levels are met thrc:u;bazt the ccntaminant plume. '1he risk :IU~!:r~~
shall follow p~,A'\1res establi.shed in the "Risk ....~-~ QUQance for
StJPerfun:! Volume I Ib8n Ileal th EIIaluatia.!!anal" (]lAGs) CEPA,l540/l-S9/002)
or any amendments thereof. 'the ~ to be JII:I'1itond an:1 analYZed for
in de~ ~ter clean-up shall be th8 inticatar chlaicals
established durin; the ~;a1 design. '1hese inticatar chemicals shall be
established MSed on the RAGS. As a preJ.~ design task, ~ter
zraUtorin; wells shall be ~led and analYZed fer the full list of d1ernical
pollutants in order to characterize OJ1.o;att ~ter a::n:titia1S.
Ertraction of c:cntaminated ~ter will oa::ur t:hraJgh a system of
extraction wells located thrcughcut the sitae '!his system will be designed
to intercept c:cntaminated ~ter betare it reaches the Blue River or
the ~l\.mlbia City well field. Specific ~ of the extraction system
will be dete:mined durin; ~ial design.
EXtracted ~ter will be treated ~ita with final t4;~ ot the
treated effluent to the Blue River. Limits ter ~ ot the treated
effluent to the Blue River have been 8Stablisbec1 by the II:Df am are
Presented in Table 9. 'l'r8at:ment will IIC8t likaly CICCUr by air strippin;;
~, specitic ~ ot the treatment systa will be detemined
~ ~iL1 cI88i9n- U it can be 8hcIm that tb8 QI1-ia City iI:71W will
have the CIIt..o.ty, willin;r8a, and tchnic:a1 Cllp8bility tar ao ..."Un; an:!
DaUtorinq the ~ ~ter, th8n the U.s. EPA will ccnaider
\.!tilizin; th8 POIW ter ~ ot the ~ ~ter. 'Ihe air
strit:Per shall be designed to treat air 8Dissians.
~ and below--
-------
31
A lcttge aDDmt of debris, in::l\X1in; blt not 1Jmta:1 to the tanks, tanker
trucks and the incinerator, is scattered thrc:u;hcut the sitae 'Ihe materials
shculd be evaluated and those detm:mined to be solic:l waste can be
ccnsolidated and placed urDar the amicipal landfill Cap or sold as scrap.
'Ibcse materials detemined to be OCI'1tam.inated with hazarCcus waste would
need to be cleans1 or c:l:isposed in acc::crdan:2 with R:RA 40 ~ Part 264,
SUbpart J and IAC ~e 24 for the tanks and tankar tz:\rJcs and ~ 40 ~
Part 264, SUbpart 0 and IN: ~. 29 for the 1rr::ineratcr. en:. the a:ntents
of the tanks have been rem:M!Id, the tanks shall be ~1eaJW:l prior to
I'e!!CVal fraD the site. .
M::Jni tbrina SVst.em
o Grc:aJndwater/SUrface water
'lhe x:mpose of grcux1water mcnitorin;J 18 to track the lcx:aticn of
ccnt.aminated grcux1water and 1NUIIClJre the etfectiwness of the renectial
action. Grc:aJndwater mcnitorin; shall occur thrc:u;hcut beth the u;par
and lower zones of the aquifer to mcnitcr the etfectiwness of the
~ i "1 actia1 and the pctential OCI'1tam.inaticn of the city well. In
addi tian, grcux1water mcnitorin; shall occur aroJI'1d the MJnicipal
Lm:ifill. '!he actual mcni torin; system will be detm:mined durin;
~i~l design. Scmples will be taken tram the sanplin; sites twice
per year at a minimJm. Each SClq:)le will be analyzed for a list of
parameters that will be determined durin; design. '!his list is
expected to include the irdicator d1emicals, lead and these d1emicals
hic;hl ighted in Table 1.
Arrj treated grcux1water d.ischarged to the Blue River shall meet the
substantive requirements of Se::ti.a'1 402 of th8 Clean Water Act and the
d.ischa.rge limits established tIy II:EH. !b'\itorin;J of this system and
the Blue River shall also be required to 8S.U:'8 a::mpliance with the
discha.rge limits.
o Air
Certain risks my be d8riV8! by th8 imalaticn of a:ntaminants
fraD exi.st;in; sita a:ntiticns or th8 r--'i JI' ac:ticn. Air emissions
fraD th8 air stripper and seil vapor tIXtracticn system shall be
Da'Utcr8c1 to ensure that tbe levels de net ~ a 10-6 amulative
life-tiJDa cancer risk at the site boun:!a%y or the substantive
requiraaBnts of the Clean Air Act.
~s Restriction
'lhe a---.e restrictions incl~ a fence to 1'M- - ~ the integrity of the cap
and prevent recreatia1al use of the larx1fill, and deed restrictions to
~It..\,jl unac:eptable cn-sita a::rstzuct:icn, partiallarly of drinkinq water
wells anj,Ior tuildin;s in the amicipal lamfill. .
In addition, the c:urrent fence does little to prch.ibit - atto the site.
-------
32
!he fera! ~l be up;raded in order to prevent ~s to the site until, at
a mirU:num, the ctirect ccntact threats have been mitigated.
x.
S'IMUltm ~CH;
Based on the informatien available at this tme, U.S. EPA and ItEM believe
this al temati ve will be able to satisty statUtory I"8QUi.rements to: Protect
human health and the envira1ment, attain ARARa, be CXI8t-e.ffectiva, utilize
permanent soluticns and alternate treaQent tedmo1c:gies or resc:urce
recovexy tad1nola;ies to the ma.v; 1111~ extent practicable.
Protectivo~C!
Al temati va 4 will be protective of human health and the envu w _tt.
Cappin; of the landfill ccntants and PAH-a:ntaminated soil will. eliminate
the direct human ccntact threat. It will also si9N.fic:antly rcwiI~
infil traticn of a:ntaminants to the c;rcundwater and pnIY8nt migraticn of
ocntaminated materials to the Blue River, W8tlards and cn-site pc:rm. In
addition, c;rcundwater ext:ractien and treat:mnt will 8'8Ur8 that the
c;rcundwater is protactiva of the river, the DJnic;~ W8ll field and
eventually arrj potential future private wall users. C8ed ~icticns wcuJ.d
provide assurances that the land beneath the larxtfill will not be
c:ti.st:w:bad. Grcurxiwater DI:IU torin; W8lls \ICUld 98U;8 the protectiveness of
the extracticn;treat:ment system en both sides of the river. Attainment of
the ~il clean-up levels for the VCC and l8lld ocntaminatien will ensure
prot.t=... -ticn of the c;rcundwater.
Atta~ of AJ:x)li~~le or Rel~ and AD:I~i.ate ~.
SARA requires that ~ial actiaw meet: legally applicable or relevant and
appropriate requ.irement,s of other envUW_l8llIILal law. 'Ihese laws may
include: the Taxic SUbstances O:~H~l Act, the Sate Drinkin; Water Act, the
Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the -,source O:nscvatien and RecOvezy
Act (RCRA), and any state law which has stricter requirEaents than the
~ federal law.
A "legally applicable" requirement is CI18 which \ICUld legally apply to the
I'e:SpOhSe actien it that actica were not takan pmaant to Sectica 104 or
Section 106 of CDCtA. A "ralevant and ~~late" ~ is cna
that, while net "applic:abla", is designe to ~y to prcblellll sufficiently
similar that -ita applicatica is at:P1.~iata.
In adctitica to ARARs, many Federal and State envL.WIIiCiIlLal and pJblic health
programs also deve1~ criteria, policies, 9Uiaan:8, and Pl,,,~.eec1 standards
that are not legally applicable, bJt that my provide usetW. information or
rec:::amerxied ~.1ures (referred to as l-ro Be O:nsidered" criteria (TEe».
'Ihese guidance or policy tit'r'I "'-nt.s -y be andder8d and used as
~~riate, where ~...uy to ensur. protactir- . If no ARMs address
a particular situatica, to-be ~Eliiderecl policies, criteria or guidelines
shcuJ.d be used to set cleanup targets.
Table 10 prF&ents a m11lllNU'y of many of the ARARs which will apply to this
-------
CNE-ICAL SPECIFIC AIAIS
C I TA T I ON
40 cn "'1
327 lAC 2.1
ACTIOI SPECIFIC AlAI'
CITATION
40 CFI 50.1 . 50.12
326 lAC 1-4-1
40 CFI 61.01 - '1.252
42 U.S.C. Section 7401 11 lIS.
326 lAC 2
326 laC a
40 CFR 122.44 Ind Stlte
regulation. approved under
40 CFI 131
40 CFR 125
40 cn 122
40 CFI 136.1 - 136.4
33 U.S.C. Section 1251
42 U.S.C. Section 300f
327 lAC 2-1
327 lAC 5
40 CFI 264.213(c)(d)
11 lIS.
11 lIS.
29 cn 1910.120
29 CFI 1926 -
LOCATIOI SPECIFIC AlAI,
C I TA T I ON
40 CFR 264.18Cb)
40 CFI 6
Appendix A
40 CFI 6.302
l' U.S.C. Section 661 11 !Ii.
33
TAILE 10
SUMMARY 0' AUIS
PREREQUISITE FOI APPLICAIILITT
Eltabtllnel -aai8U8 Cont..lna"t Levetl (-CLI)
Ind ..aal8U8 Conta.Inant Lev.t Goal. C-CLGI)
for drinkln, water
Eltabtllnad water quatlty Itandardl for tn.
State of Indiana
PREREQUISITE FOI APPLICAIILITT
Air ..1..lon. .ubj.ct to prl..ry and
S.condary A8blent Air Quetlty Standardl
A8blent Air Quatlty Itand8rdl
Air ..II.lonl lubject to Itandardl for
el,nt hazardoul air pottutantl
Air e.lliloni for VOCI
Point lource dilcharge to waterl of
the Unltad Stetel
Treat.."t, .tora,. or dilpoa.t of ICIA
hazardoua wa.t.1
Conatructlon operations at a nazardoua
waate lite
On-lite conltruction-r.tatad .ctiviti..
PREREQUISITE FOI A"LICAIILITT
ICIA hazardoul waite treat..nt, Itora,. or
dllpolat wlthl" a 100-y.ar ftoodptain
Action that witt occur In a ftoodptal~ end
retatlv.ty ftat area ..jolnln, Inland 8ftd
coaltat watera and otb8r ftoQd-prone ar.aa
ww.
Air
Itr I ppl ng
Air
Itrl ppl ng
Ai,.
It r I ppl nil
SurhcI
waUr
dilch.rge,
"onltorinll
Soit Vapor
Extraction
Conlt ruc t i on
Activltiel
-------
34
remedial actia1. In acW.ti~, the follcwinq is a mere specific description
of envircnmental laws which are lergalJ.y applicable or relevant and .
a~rcpriate to c:lifferent o...u..--=nts of the l--=dy, and an explanatia1 of
how this ~ ial actia1 meets these r8QU:inments. .
o RCRA SUbtitle D Cap
!be State ot In:tiana has jurisdictia1 tor ~ SUbtitle D (40 CIR Sectia1
257), sanitary lan:!1'ill c:peratia1 arx1 clcsure laws. '%his is a:N8red by the
In:tiana Administrative Cede (IAC) 329 IAC 2. 'Iha r&;ulatia1 a;plies to .
these facilities which c:peratecl in aa::crdance with the stated ~
and ~ no reccrd of acceptin; hazarcbJs wasta. 1IUl. U.S. EPA believes
that saDe hazardous wastes may haw been di~9d ot in the larx1till, given
the large amamt of m.micipaJ. waste in the lan:!1'ill, ~ SUbtitle D closure .
is Prctective of human health arx1 the .envirtnDent. '!be exist:inq regulati~ .
seeks to minimize infiltratia1 by specifyinq clay type, and Prauct:.e dninaqe
by specifyinq slopinq arx1 topsoil~. Al t:hcu;h the PAH-
c:cntam:inatecl soil can be c:a1tainId urx2r a soil a::wer, due to its close
Proximity to the m.micipal lan:!1'ill, the SUbtitle D cap can be extemed over
this area to eliminate the ctirect ccntact threat.
I)Jrirq the PJblic a:ImEnt peria:!, it was suggested that the DUnicipaJ.
lardfill was closea by the City in 1970. However, there is no evidence of
this, either in the fom of a closure plan or by visual inspectiC21.
'Ihe.refore, closure of the !llJnicipaJ. landfill shall be a::niucted PJrSUant to
329 IAC 2-14-29, unless evidence, in the fom of a closure plan or by
inspe:-ticn, in::tic:ates that the landfill had been previOJSly ~. If
previOJS closure can be verified, then closure shall be a:n:iucted in
acccrdance with 329 IAC 2-4-4. 'Ihese rec;uirements are ARARs ter the
l!IJn:iciPal1ardfill portiat of the site.
o
Tanks and I.ead-ccntaminated soil
Lead-ccntaminated soil was tc:ux! in the vicinity ot SB-17 and SB-17A. In
addition, high levels of lead WI!r8 also fcuu in the cWcecl tank area at the
wester.n en:! of the site. Pmvioua t8st:inq ot the tank a:ntants in::tic:ate
that the waste is ~-cbaracterist:.c due to 188&1. M8tal (~itiC3lly
lead) CXI1taminated soil/sludge shall be taste tar the charactaristic of EP
toxicity (40 en Sectiat 261.24) usir11 aD:.arttly ~ t8st:inq
methodology at the t.ime ot the analysis. 'Ihcse soils/sludges toun:t to RCRA
characteristic shall be ~; atecl usinq soil washinq or iDIDctIilizatiav
stabilizatiCZl ~loqies in order to ren:Ier it ~cteristic.
'I'reatabili ty sanies shall be a:n:iucted in arcJer to determine the JIDSt
appn:priate treat:Dent; technology far these ccntaminants. Final
determinaticn of the treatment technc10gy will be made by the 1qerr:y.
Tanks determined to be a:ntaminatad with hazardcus waste shall be cleaned or
disposed in a.a::crdance with ~ 40 em Part 264, SPI-pert J and IAC Rule 24.
Once the cantents of the tanks have been ~, the tanks shall be steam-
cleaned prior to removal. !ran the site.
-------
35
Soil Vapor E:xtractia1 an:! TreatD!nt of Air DDisSia1S
o
'!be VOC~ted soil has been detemined to be sufficiently similar to
~-1ist81 waste to make RCRA hazarc:1o.1s waste regulatia1S releYant an:!
~iata. However, ~btia1 of the VOC~ted soil will take
place in-situ, therefore, pla~'1t will net oc:a.zr an:l thus RCRA I.an:l
Disposal Restrictia1S (40 aR Part 268) will not be triggered. 'Ihe effluent
fran the soil vapor extracticn system shall meet all -prcm1lgated National
DUssia1 St.armrds for Ha.zardc:us Air Pollutants ~) (40 aR Part 61),
as 'Mell as In:tiana Air Emissia1S St.armrds (326 DC 2, 8) am shall net .
exoeed & CIJIIIJ.lati ve e.~'" lifetime cancer risk ot 10~ far the in:licator
chemicals established in acx:crCance with the "Risk Ass~-'1t Q11daraa for
SUperfUrx1 Volume I B.mIan Health Evaluatia1 ManJal8 (EPA/540/1-89/002) or arrj
amerdments thereof. 'Ihe soil vapor extractia1 syst8D shall provide for
treatment of the emissions prior to d.isc:haJ:ge into the anti. ~.
o
~ter Extractia1 an:l Treatment
'!his al te%nati ve also incl~ grc:un:!water extractiCl\ an:l treatment to .
health-based levels, ~ and/or M:Is as defined urner the safe Drinking
Water Act (SDlA, 42 tI.S.C. sectia1S 6901 et sea., an:l 40 aR section 141).
Lon;-term grc:un:!water mcnitcrin; in cxmplianca with requirements of RCP.A
SUbpart F, 40 CFR Secticm 264 .100 will be o::rxtucted to gau;e the
effectiveness of the selected .~.
RCRA Secticn 3008 (h) arC SectiCl\ 3004 (u) ana (v), prcvide U.S. EPA the
authority to order corrective action &1: a facilit:y opera1:in; pursuant to
~ frc:m which a release of hazardOJS waste or hazardous waste cxnstituents
has occurred. 'Ihe RCRA c:crrective actiCl\ authority is relevant am
appropriate to the site, as grc:un:!water scmplin; has doomented releases
fran the hazardous waste which was disp:sed t.hrcughcut JZL1Ch of the site.
Grcu1"Xiwater treatment am suJ:&equent n i ~ 1IL1St meet the substantive
requirements of the Natia1al Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES,
40 CFR section 122, 125). Discharqe of treated grc:un:!water to the Blue Ri. ver
shall meet the substantive requirements of 40 att S8ctiCl\ 402 of the Clean
Water Act am shall net ~ applicable ciisc:harg8 limits establisheC by
the State of IncUana (327 IAC 2-1).
o
Floodplain an:! Wetlands Protectic:n
u. S. EPA has a floodplains an:l wtlams policy which regulates c:::cnst.roction
in a floodp1Ai" (si1fti1ar to ~ 40 aR 270.14 (b) (ii) (iv» am fillin; of
wetlarm (40 a1t Part 230). IDpacts to beth the wtlarm am floodplain
will be CXI'1Sidered and minimized to the may;",IIJItI extent practical durin;r the
design phase of this project as stated in Executive order 11990 and 11988,
respectively.
Cost Effec1:iveness
Given the effectiveness and inplementability of soil vapor extraction,
Al t.ernative 4 achieves significant risk reductic:n in a c:arparable or smaller
-------
36
timef~ an:1 ccst than the other treatment cpticn;.
~il= ~ SolU;ions arrl A1~~~+-iV8 'I'ntahnran+- 'I'echmlcxries to
the Maxllrum Ert.snt Pr.!t~i~~l . .
nus alternative utilizes pezmnent solutiaw ancI altemative treabent
technolo;ies to the IDaV;1III1ftII extent practicable, in that it W1O.lld treat the
1Md-. am VCC-o:lr1tam:inate:1 soil an1 grcur:dwatar. 1hia al tematiw prcvides
the best balance of tradeotts amcn;r altamatiws with r&sp...'"t to the
evaluatiC21 criteria in afforcUnq lkWi¥l protectiC21 ot human health an1 the .
environment thrcugh readily ~lement.able means at r&asa1able CCI8t:s. 'Ihis
l~ represents the "';1111'" extent to wtUd1 p&Z:mn81t soluticrw am
treatment can be practicably utilize.
Pref~ tor Trei!ttment: as a ~;Nt.' El~
Alternative 4 satisfies the statutory preference for l"E!IDeQies that splay
treatment that achieves subst:ant.iaJ. risk reduct.iC21 thrcugh treatment of the
principal threat I"emainin; at the site (i.e., the lMd- ancI VCC-cart:aminate:i
soil, grtIIJnClwater, am tank CXIntents) ancI by ~ safe ~ of
other material (J!L1ni.cipal lardtill an:! PAH-a:maminate:1 soil) that will
remain at the site.
However, because this 1.~ will result in hazardcus substances remainin;
on-si te atove health~ levels (the PAH-cart:aminate:1 soil an:! the
fttmicipal Ian:!fill), a review will be a::nb:t:a::i within five years after
cx:amenoement of ~; al actiC21 to ensure that the l.--dy CXII'1tinues to
provide adequate protectiC21 of human health am the environment.
-------
-APPEHDIX A
RESPONSIVENESS SDMMARY
WAYNE RECLAMATIOIf ARD RECYCLDiG
COLDMBIA CIn, IHDIANA
-------
~A
1iUNE ~Qf AND R8:.Ya.m:;
O.JI U'tIUA c::rrr, ~
~~
I. ~ StHWri 0fmM:EW
In aa:=rdan;:e with CDaA Sectia-, U 7, a Plblic 0 .........rJt period was held tran
January 21, 1990 to Febtuazy 22, 1990, to allow ~ parties to cx:mnent
on the United States E:nvUWMI-=a:ttal Protectia-, Iqerr:j'. (U.S. £PA'S)
Feasibility ~ (FS) and Pl'v.cc Plan for a tinal ~y at the Wayne .
Reclamatiat and Recyclinq (WRR) site. At a Februa%y 7, 1990, Plblic meetin;,
U. S. EPA ana IDEM presented the Pl, ¥*Id Plan tar the WRR site, an:swere::1
questions and acx::ept:ed ~nts traD the Plblic.
n. BACIGaJND Qf CI:fIIUmY ~
'!he WRR site is located a-, the southeast edge of Q)J.umbia City, Intiana, the
county seat for ttalitley Camty, In:tiana~ Q)J.umbia City, a small residential
CCImIJnity with a pcpulatia-, of ~tely 6000, li- ~ miles
northeast of Indiana's secc:n1l~ city, Fart Wayne.
P..1blic interest regarclinq the site intensifiEd in ~ 1A..L.:r 1982, When local
officials ana residents learned ot the illegal chemical dur!pin; a'1-Site t7y
the owner and its subsequent listinq a-, the Natiaal Priori ties IJ.st (NPI.,).
There were fOJr key ;~1AS of ~Jnity ccncem:
ISSUE ':J,: While locaJ. officials ana residents believe that their water
~ly is not currently CXIl1taminated, they are c::a1Cemed that the potentiaJ.
for future ccntaminatiat still exists. In 1986, the City's superintendent of
public WOrks POinted 0Jt that city well number 8 (located at the northern
bourdary of the site) is not currently q:.&ratin; at full capacity and.
additional plm;.)in; of this well may increase the d1ances for CXIl1tamination of
the well.
T~7E '2: 'the Blue River flows alcn; the eastem and saIthem edges of the
site. 'Ihere are lU!ercus d;".-u areas within the rivers 10o-year
floodplain. Citizens are CICInC8mEd that shculci a flOOd occur, the
ccntaminant.s 1IIaJld be cUrectly washed into the Blue Riwr, thus pcsin; a
heal th threat to residents alc:n; the river.
T~m '3: S8Y8ral local Officials 8XpreSsecl c:x:ncezn that ~ agencies
had been extJ.--.ly slow to take any actia-, at the WRR site and attrib.rta:i the
delay to a lack of c:ccrainatian between State and Federal agencies. Coluzreia
City officials and residents S--A-j particularly anncyed that reclamation
operations have c:cntinued at the site, esp..;iaJ.ly after the owner had pl~ned
guilty in CXJUrt to illegal opentin; practices.
T~1E t4: In an atterrpt to c:apt:ure a portia-, of the expected ecx:.a.mi.c c;rowth
in the Fort Wayne area, Columbia City has adcpted an ~-sive bminess
1
-------
2
developDent program toenccurage fiDs to locate in or near the city. Local
officials 5~ a:n:mned atoIt the effect the WRR aite might have a1 future
~anic grtM:h in Q:)l~ia City. .
Based a1 M; C1"'11s-c:icns with local officials an:! residents durirq an
availability session in D&:;~, 1989, and the F8brua%y 7, 1990, pJblic
meetirq, questions regardirq Issues '1 an:! .3 were raised. Regcm:tin; Issue
#1, U.S. EPA I'eo::opazded that there is O1rIWttly no a::ittaminatia1 of the
City's well field or the lower zaw of the aquifer in wen it is located.
'Iherefore CXI'1taminatia1 is not likely to 0CCJr betcre the rs--4i.' actia1. is
~lemented. No official pJblic (. .....'11: was rece.ivm at this is8Je. .
Regard.in; Issue '3, the r--1;'" proa!SS for cleaninq up SUperNn &i tes
t..ems'to be len;t:hy. Given the large and cxzplex nature of th8 WRR site, and
the fact that two rem::IVal act.ia\S and an RI/FS W8r8 cxzpleted ~mts for
the len;t:hy time period between site disccYery and the '1{'-'Y~''; T1;J &i te
remediaUan. .
In addition, there is a cxn:em regardirq the City's role as a PRP. '!be
City's involvement stems fran their omer/operator status of the Old City
Landfill, located in the nortneast a:ner of the site. 'Ihe City qerated the
landfill fraD 1953 until 1970, W'hen Indiana State Boarcl of Health determined
that use of the sanitary landfill shcW.d }:)e discx:ntin.Jed.. At the time there
was ocncern that sane imustrial waste, in additia1 to DL1nicipal waste, may
have been di.spcsed at the landfill. 'Ihe .~ calls for c:appirq of this
lamfill.
III. StMO.RY OP SIQaP'ICANl' a:IHN1S ~."rm [I]RDC 'mE IUBLIC a::.Mell'
PEXrOO AND U.s. EPA ~
'!be CCItI!S1ts are organized into the follcwin; catB1Cries:
A. S\J111naIy of c::x::rments fraD the local ~1P1ity
1. o:mnents an the Feasibility Stu:!y and p~. v-::eed Plan
2. Other ~'1ts
B. SUIJIDary of ~'1ts fraD Potentially Pespaisible Parties
1. O.....Af'Its relata! to the MJnicipal Ianrjtill
2. (\ .'.'-Its relata! to th8 ~ Ass---1t
3. 0 "'.''''Ita a1 ~ter cleanup levels
4. (i ...._,ta at 1ead~ted soil and tank CXI1tents
5. n ...._,ts at cleanup of site debris
6. Other ~rrt:s
'!be ~'1ts are ~ in order to effectively ,-rize them in this
dco~rtt. 'Ihe reader is referred to the ;ubJ.ic msetin; transcript an:!
written <~...._,ts which are available at the public informatia1 repositories.
A. ~ OF a:::IHNIS l'KJI '1B! ~ CDKJn'I"{
-------
3
1. t\ -. -d,~ em the -- T'ib;1ity St:uI:!y an:! P....~-
ad Plan
c:.rJMNl': Am I C01;~--"'t in aCtS'''''i'''=J that "MAquata protectiem of human health
and the enviza~tt" in P8;8 13 of ycur 9I1I'I'IIIary (th8 P.k.~~ Plan) means
that the area affected wculc! be suitable far pJblic use as a park, er private
use fer a l::usiness dsvelopDBnt? Wc:W.cI such activitia8 have any adverse
effect en the ~rped areas? What rest.rictia'1S, it arrJ, waUc! be placed on
future use of the area?
~KI'I:m: '1'ed1nically the phrase "adequate protactiem of hr.mIIn health an:!
the environment" means that the preferred 1--4y, Altcnatiw 4, CI1Ce .
i11plementecl, will cl8ilJ'q) th8 sita 80 that any parIICI'\ wanderin; em the site,
perfominq CXI'1Structicm cn-site, ar c!rink:i.nq watar traR a WIll cn-site will
be protect:.eQ. However, CI18 DUSt keep in mind that CCIIplet:a cleamJp of the
site is not predicted far at least 15.}'8U'S. In adltiticm, the cap(s) over
the Dm1icipal landfill an:! .the PAH-ocntaminater:! soil will remain cn-site
forever an:! therefore, will requir8 lana-use r&.L.lctia'1S an:! maintenance on
that area of the site. Generally, these restrictia'1S are to protect the
inpmreable cbaracteristics of the cap so that ccntaminants will not migrate
to the gro.n:lwater er pose a c1ir8ct cr:::ntact thrMt. 'lberefore, CXI'1Struction
an:! well installation in this area shall be pretUbiter:!.
CIJIItEm': '1t1e citizens of this lYWmIIwU,ty an:! th8 broader Fort Wayne area are
c::cnoernec! abc:ut the site an:! wish to participata in an lnfomecl manner, an:!
to seek application fer the TAG (Tedmical A9sistance Grant) program. In
addition, there is c:cncem that FRPs c!cin; the wark may have a finan:ial
conflict of interest, therefore the citizens neecS to be represented.
~~: Given the fact that this site is at the Record of Decision stage,
it is too late tc apply fer a TAG to participate in the RI/FS process;
however, there is still time to qet involvecS in the ~i a.l Desi~
Action P1ase of the project. Technical A9sistance Grants, ar TAGs, provide
up to $50,000 to carmmity ~ wi.sh:inJ to hire c:cnsultants to U1terpret
sanplin; results, reports, an:l other ~-a. 'lhirty-five percent of the
request:ai funciin; aDICIJI'1t JIIJSt be mat:c:h8d by t:h8~. Far ~le, if
$50,000 were requestec!, t:h8 qrcup JIIJSt prgvi.de an addi tiaal $17,500, er
cbtain it fraD 5aDe ct:h8r SCIUrC8. 1h8 mat.dUnq turas may be cbtained fran
in-kin::i scvices an:l 8:'f ari9inata trcm any ncn-f8deral source. ~ camet
be usee to duplicate ti8ld or latICIJ:ataty \lark. '1bIy lilY 1:)8 usecl cnly to
unders1:ard or int:arpret 8Xi.stin; ~-"1ts an:l activiti- a:n::hx:te:1 at the
site. !tJnic:ipaliti., oth8r ~ agenci., ar Potentially Fespa\sible
Parties are not 8liq:ib1e to r8:8ive~. Hcwev8r, ~ officials may
belcnq to a ~~ty group ~ a TAG. 'I'h8 crIIIDer1tQr can c:cntact u. s.
EPA Public Atfain Office at (800)621-8431 between 9:00 a.m. an:! 4:30 p.m.,
central T:iJDe in order to request a (TAG) ~lic:aticm.
Rsqarclinq the ~a.cm that PRPs c!cin; the waz:x may have a financial ocnflict
of interest, U.S. EPA 1IiaUc! oversee all \ICDc which may be a:n::hx:te:1 by PRPs
at the site to ensure that the uaaly is pl.~ly iDplementa:1.
aMmfl': Ya.t (U. S. EPA) are gcin; to identity the overall tcxic azzamts am
the relevant a:n:entrations aa:::crctin; to an EP Taxicity. I ask that you tIy
-------
4
arC maJce ,theSe detm:minatia'& SO ya.l (U.S.EPA) can ~rtien liability. If
you . do a sb.dy that seeks to identity the relatiw tc::Dcicity am the
contribJtien amcunts at the \IIhole site, then you can apportien and allow a De
Minimis settlement, am allow parties that reascnsbly p.tt in SO galla'S
tcwa1'tls this problem to pay SO gallaw of an averall 80lutien to it am net
en:1 in an absolute ~ jacJcst of financial ruin ar payirq tu;e amcunts
to the other settlinq parties. .
1
-------
.
5
be the sole I"eSpaDibility of the citizens of t:hia city to take care of this
situation. .
~~: Since Cc11Jlli)ia City was th8 owner/cperatar of the DUnicipal
lanCfill durin;J the official period of cperatiat bea..n 1953 an:1 1970, the
City will be held liable for at""Pi
-------
6
a1 a p%t.ia'\ ot this site. 'Ihus, the proper dmracterizatia'\ ot the
MJnicipal Iandfill is a closed selid waste lardfill with an open duq)
sectia'\. since open duq)inq of retuse cUd ocx:ur an a p%tian of the
MJnicipal Iandfill follawin;J closure, the a;plicable requirements for closure
of qen duq:& is foun:1 at 329 DC 2-4-4.. .
R&S~: Al thcu;h the Baraneck ~ t:. states that. the DUnicipal lanifill
was closed in 1970 't:rj t:b8 1SII!, it is rx:n: indicated what is meant by the tem
"clOlS81" . Giwn that th8 State, CtI.Inty, an:! City baV8 tailect to prtWide
evidence ot lan:1fill closure in teD& ot it be.in; C'IIn-VCX7V8Z:'8I1, it is very
likely that the tem "closed" siJlply means that cperaticna ""-«1. At the
present tine there is no evidence, in the tam ot a closure plan or by visual
inspSctian that the lan:1fill was ever ~rr-VCCMIr8I1. 'Iheref0r8, t:ba City is
inccrrect in it's assertian that the lan:1fill sbaWi t:. defined as an "open
~", an::l closure shall be in aa:ordanr:::8 with 329 DC 2-14-19. Hcwever, if
infomatian aevelopea durinq the design investigatian indicates that the .
DUnicipallamtill has previously been C"t{'ed, th8n closure shall be in
ac:xxdance with 329 IAC 2-4-4.
a:Mmfl': 'Ihere is no a;plicable requirement tar clCBUr8 ot a scJ.id waste
landfill un:Jer federal law.
~kriSE: Al thcu;h there are no specific regulatians urder federal law for
closure ot a solid waste landfill, the Solid Waste Dist-=U Act (42 U.S.c.
6901-6991i), RCRA SUbtitle D established criteria under W'hid1 States were to
develop Solid Waste Plans. Am::n; the requirements to be mst in establishirq
these plans, is that the State shall provide far the c:lc::sin; or ~ of
all exi.stin; ~ d\.mp; within the State ~ to the requi.nment.s of
Sectiat 4005. 'nw State of Irniana has prcvided for these requi.nment.s by
pra1l.1lgatin; 329 DC 2.
CIH4ENl': 'nw p",. ¥:eed Plan shculd be revisect to delete ar'rf ...~ for the
nunicipal lan:1fill. As nctect in earlier o....-Iata s.Jtmitted an behalf of the
Carmittee a1 NcvE!!li)er 22, 1989 regarc:linq the draft FS Rsport, the 1IIJrticipal
landfill is a separate area which is rx:n: aUy c1i.visible fraD the other areas
at the Site in terms of the alleged ham, tut is also divisible in tams of
the PRPs Who can be Al1qr1 to be nspc:ulible tar creatin; am a:ntri1::utin;
to that ham. ~y, th8 1IUI'\i.c:ipIl lardtill shculd rx:n: t:. :included in
ar'rf Ia) which the Q:lIIli:~r _..1 C' PRPs are ask8:1 to iJIplement.
: Q\ o.~_..J -- 1.5, 1989, U.S. EPA ~m:l to th8 PRP St8erln:;
Calmittae'. -~ 22, 1989 letter as tollawa:
"Althcu;h th8 MJnicipaJ. Ian:1till \IU operated by C01Ulli)ia City
fraD 1953 to 1970, it is :inclu:B:t as part ot the site am, in
keepin; with the 1qercf's policy, will net be dealt with as a
separate er1t%y.
~ yOJr a.ssertian that the cu...",_.t RI/FS set::t:.lors are not
liable for clean up of the ot the Old City Ian:1till, ~c;:r1IDBrtt
of !mIRA ccsts is the PRPs respc:ndbility. All PRPs will be asJcsQ
thrcu;h special notice to a:nb:t the RDjM (:inclu:tinq prI!Yicgs
na1 3E.tt.1or). However, as I intomed ya1 in cur NcM!IIter 2, 1989
-------
7
meetinq', it is the PRP's resl;~.u:a:ibility, not U.S. EPA's, to
address the quest:.ien of ~en."
In aatitien, qiven Mr. Broc:.1t-"1'S (owner of WRR) 8lq::py d;~ practices
and the fact that he requested permissien to di ~ of material in the
lardfill in 1975, it is very likely that waste frail the WRR site was also
ti;~ of in the larxttill. In fact, the ink sl\D;e area is locatea in an
area believed to be part or the amic:ipal lan:1till: an:! sawdust a:ntaminate:!
with volatile materials was cti.sc:cMIrecl by Brad Bradley (previCU8 mM) durin;
the ink slua;e removal at the narthem end of th8 lan:1till en the western
side of the aa::ess road. fUrtbencre, durin; excavatien of waste in the .
slua;e ravine, solid waste was erxnmte:red as excavatiat pro:-~ ncrthwarc1
in the ctirectien of the DJnicipal landfill. 'Ih8s8 facts lead th8 )qercj to
a:n::ltDa that SCIDe wastes trc:m the WRR si~ WII!r8 di~ of in th8 DJnicipal
larxttill.
Rsqardi.nq the request that the Pl. y.ed Plan be t'8Vis8c1, the Pl. ".~ Plan is
net a ~-PJt that will tie mcc1ified. 'Ihe pu%pQ88 of the ~. yJSa.l Plan is to
issue a notice to the public statinq Whid1l~Y the 1qerr::y is ~~in; for
a qiven site. 'Ihe Recorcl of D8cisien and att:achec1 Respcr.siveness SUzD:Dary are
dt'Y"l-T1ts that CIa1Sic1er public ~'1t by either incatporatinq ~riate
c::han;es into the final l:~ or prcvic1i.n; explanatien in respa~ to a
camnent.
2. O...._,ts related to the ~ :as'S" - -IL
SUre is ,,'~ nil.
R!:stUlSE: As is tiiCt"'l1eec in th8 RX>, there is SCID8 questien whether there
are two aquifers separated by a ocnfinin:; ZCIW. 'Ih8 gecloqic c:rcss-sections
presented in the RI Rspcn. t. Wic:ata that the ocnfininJ zcne may net be
~. Given this urDIZ'tainty, U.S. EPA can c:nly agree that ~sed en
the evidence to data OCI'1t:aminatien is locat81S in t:b8 ~ Za18 of th8
aquifer. HcwIv8r, it tba ccntizUn; zcm is net ~, as tba c::rcss-
sectiaw L.jo~, then the likalihooc1 of ccnt:aminanta mic;ratinq dcwrMam into
the lower ~ of the aquifer wtwn the Dlmi.cipal W8ll is pmpin; O8rtainly
exists. ~'re, the fact tbat there an cmnntly 1"1) WIlls located in
the ~ Za8 ot the aquifer does not mean that there will never be arrj
W1e.lls lcx:atecf there in the tut:ure. '%his is ~-$Cially true once the site
soils have been cleaned an:! the DJnicipal landfill has been ~.
'1berefore, a1e cannct acm- that the ''prcbability of ~ is ,,'~
nil. " If there is a potential for ~ to be ~ to the c;rcun:!wate.r
contaminated tIy the WRR site, then the U.S. EPA has an cbligatien to evaluate
tne risk .~~iatea with that ~ eure - as was dcn8 in the ~
~S'Ei~'-"'1t - an:! ~bte arrj "c~iated risks. Since the ~
Assessment detemineQ that the qrcun:jwatar ~ a a.muJ.ative _e
lifetime cancer risk Whid1 rarqed fraD 2 x 10-3 to 2 x 10-5 far DJnicipal
-------
8
well. userS ard trcm 2 x 10-2 to 2 x 10-4 for potential pri vats well users,
the kJercj is obligated to ~;;IIte the ~tar a::ntaminaticn at the WRR
site.
CIH4PM': sin:e there is no a::ntaminaticn detect8:S in the deep aquifer there
is no 01r'r'el1t risk to users of DlJni.ci.pal water ~ Al thcu;h investigaticn; ~
that there is a potential fer flow frc:m the upper ~er to the lower
aquifer W'hen the Dmicipal well is PJq)i.ng, unlesa t:here is a dnmtic (more
than c:Jcul:)le) .increase in usage of the Dmici.pal WI8lla, t:here is no tuture
risk to users of Dmicipal water. Even if PJq)i.ng of the 1IL1nicipal wells.
were to in:rease, the. a:r1taminants that my micp:ate fraD the ~ aquifer to
the lower aquifer ~c1 be diluted by a factcr of at least 200 before they
reached the Dmici~ well. 'Iherefore, the risk at the DlJni.cipal well W1CW.d
be less than 1 x 10-6 fraD 'Ia an:1 vinyl chlaride. ..
~fuSE: As mentia18d abcYe, the iqen::f has an cbligaticn to ensure that
all CJrrent an::\ potential expaPJreS to a:r1taminants that pcse a risk are
addressed. As t4;c:t"'I1S~ below, it is the 1qercy'S p:8ition that there is a
potential future risk to users of the DlJni.cipal wall. .
Since no cala1l.atians were prcvidsd to ~"t this statement that usaqe of
the mmi.cipal well ~d have to be "Da:'e than dcuble" an:1 that dilution
~d oa:ur ''by a factor of 200" before c::art:aminants \IICUl.d read1 the
zrunicipal well, the 1qerC'f has ac:.cnlNWi that this is ba~ en a leakage
CDefficient which was dsYelcped in the RI Rspcrt.. 'Ibe dsvel~ of that
data was based en the assuapticn that there is a twc aquifer system separated
by a confin:in; zone. However, in lookirq at the CJ8Olo;ic crcss-sections
presented in the RI Rep:Jrt, it is questia'1aCle whether there exists a
continuous confinin; zae. In additien, if the ccnfinin; zae is mt
c:cnti.nuoJs, then that \IICUl.d mean that there is aUy CD! aquifer.
F\Jrther1tcre, even if the a::ntaminated ~ter c:culd be diluted "1::Iy. a
factor of 200" by the tiDa it reacnea the DUnicipal WIIIll, the levels of
a::ntaminaticn ~d still be abc:w8 the !C.s/JC.GS far scme of the .
ccntaminants (e.g., 'It:! was detected at a 1I8)l'i'llll1lft ~-=ait..Qtia'1 of 25,000
ppb, a 200 time diluticn woad res.1lt in a ma.v;'IIII1Ift QQuoentratia'1 of 125 ppb.
'Ihe !CL for 'Ia is S :psi), therefore, the maYi'llll1lft ~..cut...Qtia'1 \IICUl.d still be
25 times the !CL.)
c:x:JIII!!Nl': ~ p~. ~ P--'lial Plan fails to state that the probability of
exposure (to a::ntaminate::l soil) is very low. In fact, the risk trc:D PAR-
a::ntaminated 8011 was c:ala1l.ated based en CD! soil 5aq)le c=llected fran the
area of the p:U.ice shcctin; ran;e in an area hMvily ~ with CrJsh.
'Iherefore, the pX.ential for tn5pae-rs to cross this CD! spot en the site
is small. In additia'1, the rn1ftlhA.r of m:uvir1nalA UJcaly to ~ cn the
Site is probably very low, thus turther reducinq the potential for expo5'lre
at the Site. It is anti c~te::i that the rnmner of exposed in:ti v; ,...".1 q \IICUl.d
be ~, thus reducing the prc:t:Iability of crI'ltaCt.
ImSl'UISE: 'Ibe 1qerCJ D1..W~y 1'1; ~J&. u with this (). ....~. 'Ihis issUe \Wc1S
t4; C!J"'! ~eeM ru.mercus times with these PRP ccmuentcrs durin;J their cJsvelqment
am sutmittal of tne abaYe menticnad ~ Assoo--It \/hic:h ~T'S in
-------
9
the Final RI Report.
First, rega.rdin; the J"II~.r of ~les taken in the area of the police
shootin;J ~ (W'here the PAH~ta:1 soil 18 loc:ata:1), awe. soil borin;s
were ~led in this area aml:lCth fc::a.n:l high 18Y8ls of PAH a:I'1tamination.
5ecx:rdly, the police shootin;J ran;J8 area is IJ:!t "heavily overgrown with
brush", in fact, it Dm'8 clcsely ref! -'-les an 01*' field that is easily
ao;,ese jble.
Regard.in; the stat:.Emmt that "the J"I~.r of in1ivit4na1!11 likely to t-.~\a~C: on
the Site is prc:i:Iably very law", there is no buia far this statslllnt. ~~
to the S:Lte is unI~L.ict8d - there .is no fenc8 on the westem tx:a.zrmry of
the site, the gate to the city well fielc1, at th8 narthem en:i of the site is
cpan many han's thrc:u:;bcut th8 day, am th8 gate to th8 site qB1S wide
encu;h to allcw a ~ adult to enter.the site. In addition, the site is
situateci adjacent to a residential area am there have been .~ls of
c:hi.ldren playin; on the site.
Finally, the SUpertund pl.1oiI::f.aw has always desic;nsc1 its rI!I1ECties to be
protective of AU intiv; t'1IUI 1!11 am environmental receptcrs that my be exposed
at a site: a:n;equent1.y, u.S. EPA believes it is ~ to include AU
reasa18bly expecteci ~ in its risk a...----rt:s. Given the
unrestricted ...--e at this site, it is u.S. EPA/s position that the ~
scenarios arr:l cala1lata:1 risks ae.c:t'Y"iata:1 with these scenarios provide a
realistic descriptial of the WRR site risks.
3. O-...-&Ls at ~ cleanJp levels
a:M4EN1': '!he FS, ~c:h U.S. EPA apprcM!Id, reoognizes that ma>r;M1I!I
c::ontaminant levels (1CIs) my net be ~,"¥"iate as ~ter cleanup
'J08ls. As is dccumented on page 47 of the FS, alternate (X.h~I1UQtiat limits
(ACts) cculd be ~,"¥"iata far the Site as c;roundwater cleanup goals., if it
can be shewn thrcu;h turther invest:igatia'\ that all a:I'1taminata:1 c;rcun1water
disd1arqes to the Blue Riwr am has no adverse effect on the river.
~l'U'SE: '1'h8 i.ssu8 ~ th8 use of Aa8 ,,~- !C.s has been ~;c:I"'!1S~
at 1"AJIIIIrQJS occasicna with th8se PRP .~ ....-ntars. All th8 RiM stata:1 in a
NaveIIb!r 2, 1989 JIII8t.in; an:! 0.:-..1 C' 15, 1989 18tt8r rega.rdin; this issue,
AC!.s are inapprcpriate at tbi5 site am the t4i....--ia\ of N:ts for each of
the r--1ia1- IICticn altcnatiws in the FS shall be replaoM with a
c;roundwatar p8I) an:! treat syst8D. 'IbI imIs ~i81 with this c1irectia'\ in
the final FS. In addition, the m:M allClW8Cl far a general ~; c:l"'!1$lc:iat at N:I..s
in the Final FS: hcw8Yer there is no a:n::lusion that AC1s are ~iate for
the WRR site. '1'h8 use of ACts shculc1 net be a:nsidered since it w:uld net be
protective of human health an:1 the envL.,--1IUIIII'1t ar CXI1'ply with ARARs (M::Is in
this case).
'1be March 8, 1990, pJblicatiat of the Natia1al Oil and Hazardcus SUtstances
Pollutiat ~ Plan (10) (40 ~ Part 300) is also very clear an the
use of ACIs. '!be 10 states that N:I..s waUc1 be ~'"¥" iate it cx:n:liticns of
a:RaA Section 121 (d) (2) (9) (ii) are met an:1 clearJJp to !C.s or other
prctective levels is net practicable. 'n1e Prwmble to the NCP provides
-------
10
further explanatia'1 as follOWS:
"ACts shcUld cnly tie used \/hen active restcratiCl'\ of the
~ter to 1ooJ:Is or ncI'1-Z8rO !CI.GS is net practicable..
Clearly, the availability of institutiCl'\al ccntrols in itself is
net sufficient rea.sa'\ to exte.rU the allowarx:e for levels abaYe
dri.nkin;J water st.ardards or ~zero goals: rather ...
institutiCl'\al ~1L...wls are a:nsidered as the sole s.~ c::rUy
\I/here active ~i AtiCl'\ is net practicable..
'n1e FS, ~~ Plan, aM Feccrd of eecisiCl'\ all state that ~ter
extractia'1 aM treatment is technically practic::able to iJIplement. 'Iherefore
the use of ACts instead of !CIs or other health euea levels is net an
~rcpriate cleanup 1SYe1 for th8 WRR site.
a:M4m1': 'n1e (m> Steerin:;) Qmldttee has developed a ~ter mcnitoring
plan (Attachment B of the ~ letter) for the Site to det.eImine if any
c::cntaminated ~ter is migrati.rl;. urD!r the Blua River aM thus to
determine if ACls are ~s.~riata. 'Ihe 1II2\itcrin; plan includes the
installatia'1 aM ~lin; of 1II2\it:orin; wells aM piezc:meter nests at seven
locations cn-site aM off-sita east aM south of th8 Blue River. 'Ihe off-
site wells will tie located direCtly dom;radient of the kncWn areas of soil
aM ~ter c::cntaminatiCl'\. 'the R:)O sho1ld specifically i.nc:mporate the
work plan (Attad'ment B of the . ~ .....Pl'1t letter).
~rQSE: As ~iet"'l]C!c:M in the abaYe ~ aM tespcn;e, the use of ACls at
the WRR site is i.na.wropriate. ~, a ~ review of the W'Ork
plan sutmitted to dete%mine if any c::cntaminated ~ter is migratin;
\J1"der the Blue River 'MaS fourxi to tie inadequate. An inveStiqatiCl'\ of this
nature should also incl\X3e well points in the river aM a ucnitcrin:;J system
that '-'Olld characterize ~ter flew thrt:U;hcUt an entire year (in order
to dete%mine any s-..~ variatiaw in the ~ter flew reqiJDe) .
Finally, it is ~rcpriate to include a wrk plan of any kW in the R:)O.
cnMNl': EPA has ~ed t:h8 need for flexibility in the foaulatiCl'\ of
selected remedies for SUperturd sites. EPA cswm Directive No. 9355.4-03
(oetcber 18, 1989) di-"'-v t:h8 results of an EPA inYestigatiCl'\ of c:ase
studies devel~ frCD data at 19 CDCtA aM ~ facilities. 'Ihe report
points cut that while th8 most ,> .....t'fl 1II!thal for ~ c::cntaminated
~ter- is ext:raCtiCl'\ and treatment "it is otten DCr8 aiffic:W.t than
estimated to achieve cleanJP ~_&tratiCl\ gcals in ~ter." 'Ihe report
~.en:1s that flexibility be in:lu:1sd in the selected s.~ to DCdify the
system b-c:M CI'\ WomatiCl'\ gained durin:;J cperatiCl'\.
'1be R:)C for the site shcW.d adcncW1ED;Je that the in:1ividual pJ:()OeSS
~~, specific cperati.rl; parameters. dJratiCl'\ of cperatiCl'\, clearAJP
goals, aM cther specific aspects of the selected s.a;s:J.y may be DCdifie::i
based CI'\ data obtained durin:;J operatiCl'\ of the system.
'1be clireCtive ncteS that a waiver of 1CLS may be warranted if experience in
cperatirJ;J a ~ter extraetiCl'\ system ~LateS that the system c::annct
practicaDly achieve !CIS.
-------
u
~~: ~ Directiw No. 9355.4-03, CCnsid8raticns in Grt:Jurdwater
~;;IItien at SUperfurd Sites, was i-wad en 0ct.c:Ib8r 18, 1989, in part to
provide z-~.....~tic:ns far DlCCtifyin; t.h8 SUperfurd ~ch to grc::urxtwat.er
remediatien. It is ~ en a study Which l0ak8S at 19' grc::urxtwater
extractien and treabent systems. 'Ihe II'b.I!y detamined. that several factors,
sud1 as system design ar whether ar net there ia ~ leadUn:;J fran the
sc:urce, can limit th8 effectiveness of the ext.aCt.icm system and these n8eQ
to be CCI'1Siderec1 when cSesic;nin; th8 system. Sinca, at this tiJaa, W8 have no
evidence to inticata that the pl- ,"0 Md g:ran:twatar ut.......'tien system will hot
achieve the cleanup stan:ards ~ifi81 in th8 JQ) within the estimated time
frame, it is ~MZy tc a:mialr a waiwr far Ja.. ~, in
light of the fact that th8 Dlmi.ci pal wall fi81cl 18 n8IUtri and th8 ~ "lity
is ccn:emea with pot:antiaJ. a:I1taminat.icl'1 of th8:ir water supply, any
DlXiificaticns tc the cleanup levels shcW.cI net be a::nsiderec1 wi thcut inp.zt
fran the citizens of CclUlltlia City. If infexmtic:n gathered durin;
~lementatien of the l.e-:.dy ~ that a re-evaluatien of the t~y is
r--o;ary, then such a re-evaluatien \IOUlci c:nly occur when sufficient
Wonatic:n t- . ~'- available tc ~ re-evaluat.icl'1.
4. n.....-tLs em the ~ soil arI1 tank a:mt:snts
CXMmfl': 'Ihe CCmnit:t8 has deY8lopsd a work plan far acktitic:nal
investigatien of the Broc:k!!Bn tank area and lead-a:l1taminated soils in the
area of SB-17 and SB-17A. 'Ihe work plan is incl\XJed as Attachment C (of the
PRP's ~.nt letter) and provides details of the varia.1S il'1vestigati ve
o..l~ ~ (soil borin;s and grc::urxtwatar DaUtarin; wells) . 'Ihe CCmnittee
Z-~ ....-'1ds that this wcrk plan be incozporatea into t.h8 R:)[) and that the R:>D
specifically state that the msthccI and extant of r--H ;lltic:n for these areas
will deperx! en results of these st:ur:ii.es.
ms~: '%he 1q!rcj lRZeciates the PRP's interest in Sb.Cyin; the.
ccntaminatien in the tank area; hcwever, u stated previously, it is
inapprcpriat.e tc incozporat.e a waDe plan in the Ja). It is the /tqercy's
pasi tien that the waDe plan far d8linMt.icI'1 of th8 8Xt81t of lead
ccntaminatien shcW.cI be 8U1::111itted with the ~;J\l Design./Rea&:1ial Actic:n
(RDjRA) waDe plan. 'Ib8 PRPs will be qiwn th8 ~~ty to de the waDe
required in the attac::h8:1 Ja) and are ~ tc %"8SI,hw!; t the waDe plan
with the entire K>/RA wert plan, if they c:hx88 to a:rdJct the l--aJf.
It shculc! be not8:1 that the R:X) da8s provid8 far acktitia1al investic;aticns
and treatability 8t:ur:ti- in these areas in ard8r tc better clefizw the area of
ccntaminatien. 'Ib8 Ja) also allCIWB far SCIII8 flexibility in detaminin; Which
treatment tedmclcqy shall be utilizec1.
CDHm': 'Ihe ~ identities the pot:antiaJ. ta:::hnoloqies of soil c:appin;, soil
washin;, and iDm:i;)ilizatic:n far th8 z-_H at.icl'1 of lead~ted soils.
Pend.in; further investigatic:n of the 188d~tad soils ara.ni SB-17,
the R:)[) shculc! net select any specific z-r-'bJ tac:hnology tc ~;;IIte that
area. until the levels and extent of lead cxmaminatic:n in this area are
defined. and a suCsequent sc:reenin; of pctential zw-'ial tachr¥:)loqies is
perfomed, the apprcpriate ~;al response c:annct be detetminea.
-------
12
~~: Given the relatively high levels of lMd (1980 PPD an:! 1650 PPD);
the fact that low levels of lead cc:rrt:am;inatiat have been detec:ted in
mnitorin; well 1 shallow (K¥-ls), \ltUen is loc:ate:1 dcwn;radient fran soil
borin; .17 (SB-17); am the fact that treat:Dent of tha material may be done
in cx:njun::tiat with the treatment for the lead cc:rrt:am;inatiat in the tank
area, it is the NJerci's pcsitiat that soil washin;' or imD:::Cilizatiav
stabilizatia1 waJld be an ~ta treatment t.ed1nala;y. However I as
stated in the Ja), final dete1::minatia1 of the trMOIBnt tad1ncla;y will be
based a1 treatability st1xUes. A soil ocver wa.Ud do nothinq to prevent the
migratiat of the lead to the graJr'Cwater as it ck:I8 lX't create an ~le
laym;-. If it can be demQu18Uated that the lMd in this area (nMr SB-17 ani
SB-17A) 1.8 lX't EP Tc:Dcic, c:ausin; the waste to be ~ c:hanct.arist..c, then
treatment may lX't be r--~. .
5. n .'.'-Its at cleBrq) of site debris
-------
13
cap. 'Ibis ~ ~~ally iDportant here given the ~ salvage value of
many it8D8 at the s~ta \ihic:%1 may be viewed as "d8bria".
~~: '%he R:)I) does net require cleanup of .ita d8bris o:nsidered to be
solid waste or clean scrap metal: haJ!eI.-. it does pnwide that these
materials can be di ~ of CZ1 the DUnicipaJ. larrlfi 1,\ prior to closure or
salvaqed. '!he}qerq enr:xmages that materials 8haUci. be salvaqed ana site
debris, de1:er.mined to be sclid waste, be "'i~ at CZ1 the DUniciral
landfill prior to clOSU1'8 in orcSer to eliminata any n.Usanca.
6. Other n ---.- ils
c:x::tM!NI':. It is %"AO _..._~ that the R:)I) be tl8X:ib1. - to the I8thcci for
treatinq c;rcun:!water p~ fraD the sita. 'Ih8 FS 8bcws that two DISthcds,
air strippinq with cti.scbarge to the Blue River and P.1q)inq to. the C011Jlli)ia
City Publicly OWned Treatment Works (R7IW), are equally ette::tive for
treatinq c;rcun:!water traD the site. '1herefore, selectiCZ1 of the preferred
nethcci can be "ased CZ1 eco.-..aic o:nsideraticns. It is %'111.. -..,~n:Bj that the
final decision CZ1 treatment JDErthcd be DBde durin; the design P1ase of the
project after more aa::urata a:st estimates are deYelq.:!.
~~: '!he 1qerr:;y has o:nsidered this ~"1t ana JI8de pravisia'1S in the
R:)D for ext.ractec1 c;rcun:!water to be tr&ateci or ~ to the RnW for
treatment. licw1ever, it shcW.ci be note:1 that a ci8cisiCZ1 to use the RnW will
be ~ net c:nly CZ1 the RnW's capacity, blt CZ1 their willin;ness to aa:ept
the wastestream ana their. ability to be Dr.ni tored thrc:u;Jh a pretreatment
p~.~. .
-------
APPENDIX B
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
WAYNE RECLAMATION AND RECYCLING.
COLUMBIA CITY, INDIANA
-------
:~r! Ie.
:;,6.1'0
AOK1'ISr.AfrVI "CO'D 1'011
lUll RlCUIArI0. , ."rUl" srrl . D'DA', '0. J
CO~DK'IA Clfr.l'DIAIA
:tIII1.A', PAG'S DAtI fULl UrJO' IIC11111' DOCD"" fr" DOCIDllh
J "/04104 L,tt,r r': ~'tt'r of J.I'r~b,ll,JOi "10"1 IU fT" a ,DSI1A Corrupoad'a~,
lat,ae co eOlp1, 'Jeb Sc"rJa, CO.IJet"
eb, S,ceJoa 106 Ord,r
J "IlZlH ~'cc'r r,: I.S. "A', f.'rd"ISI1A ',ll'OI.,ir,ACCr, C,rrupOidue, 2
r"po." co eb, ,., for SC
Sc"rJa, C~"Jte,,',
ob],ceJo., co eb, '"
IS
'O/021l' 'abli~ co..,ae 1,tt,r C.Arcb,r,eitit'l of f.'rd',DSlPA Corrupoadlle, J
00 eb, ,., 'ropo"d Cola.bu Car
'l,oll".ibilier Scadr
" '0/02120 ~'ce'r r': 'ablic '."11 'C.Oa.,ir,Atc,.. f.'rd"aSlPA C,rrupoodlle, 4
eOI',oe 1,te,r 00 eb, for cb, '" Se"rio,
,.. Propo"d '1,al COlla ell
1",ibJIJer Scudr,'Jcb
Atueb.ue, A.C
8 90/02.':1 L,ce,r r'; PublJC 1..,11 'C.Oua,ir,Aeer' r.lrd"aSI1A Corrupoaduc, S
co..,.e 1,ee,r o. eb, for ebt PIP SC
,.. 'ropo"d '1'01
r'"ibJlitr Scud,
fro. 'jIIJ" B,ll ,ad
CbrJ,eopb,r Oao.ir,
Aecora". for eb, ',P
SC"IJa, CO'.Jtt"
, '2112121 "'0 r,: ftip ',pore J.OiiJ.i., DSIPA G.r,.d,rl"a,DSI'A ',.otudu ,
eolG.bi. Cit, .od re.
"'11. l.dull
'0'. Jlti 114 D,e. 1,
lJU
'OIDOlDO .,.. t" "TI' ',el...- f..,d"USIPA 'H, 'lIotlldu
cil' ..1 ',e,ell":
lit' .i,tlt, r".tdi.,
ca, ,.,ielp.l ,.,dtlll
Ittl ot tbt Il C,
U/UIOJ ',.,p.p,r 'tticl, C.lu.bi. Cit, 'o.t aSIPA '".p.p,r Artlel" ,
'tltt,o b, ,. ',r,a,;,
Jr.,I" 'l.; A"",.,ot
ebat ealld, .fut
"11. ia pl,e, ,t ,.,.
.itb , .du,u"
r,pr",ot,tlCO of oa,
-------
~! .Ja. Z
.Z=.n
jD'I.lSr'ArIV' ,rCO'D I.Dr:
,jr., f,eLA'AfIO. i .,erLeI.G SIf' . alDAf' 10. 1
COLa'.Ij eIfr,IIDIA.j
.7 1'1 1j"5 U rr ' fULl jUrJOR RlCIlll1r Docan.f rr" DOCIUIBU
,ro,. "'CJoa at tb.
rlR Il tf
10/03122 'b, AttidarJt for tb. S. 'rora.Attuat r.Gatt.'otar, 'Dblie Otb.r ,
AffJaac. Sc,pbaa D.
'ro'a, rbo op.rat,d
a .~aaieJp,l .1aadJll
OD prop,rt, tbac J,
Dor tDora " th fIR
Sup,rtaad Sit,
! 7510.103 Ba:ardoa. ra.t' fort f.'roctuD,'U .',port,IStadi,. 10
Sb"c 'itb ",C,
d"erJptioo eo.pl,t,d
b, ra,D' ',cla.atJOD
i "CTClJa"Iac.
1 "105128 DJo:JO '"t R"ult,- foodltu~.el Td, D.Caplic"aS'lA hporUIStadJu lJ
IDCJa,rator Ar,a for CODsalaat,
tbt fa,D' fut' OJI
'rol'cc
3D salWOO "AD r,tJ..tJOD ot tbt l.IroltD i l.DoDC,ll" 1i1, RfpOrti/Stadiu 12
RJ,t j"OCJ't,d rJtb tbt ":,, Ai' aDJ"r'JCT
Or,.aJc COD.tJta,ct, of
'.:ardoo. aad laaJcJpal
f"c, L.adtJll L"cbat,,'
Ba:ardoD' ralt, i '.:.rd-
oa, ,.c,rJ.l., rolal' 5,
IGlber 1, ""
IT 'OIOl/DO '.,a, ItcllllCJOD .ad as"A lor ta, 'aUic ',portilStldi u 13
'fcrcll., 'fOf'I,d 11",
ColalbJ' eJt" I.di.a.
HI 10/01100 lu,jbilit, Stad" r.r:rc 'afJa,.rJDf IDC. ,.. .II'S ,., Groap hport.IStadiu 14
fU IIIlS Siu
C.11..i. Cit" IDdi...
35 '0/02107 Irocrrdil" .t ta, J...bl,rbitlf, '"orticf f.l,d', as"A fnuctJpt 15
r.,., Ifcl'lItJoa ud SurJ e,
l,c"lJD, i."r!DDd
Sit' 'Delie 'f'tJa,
-------
P',t 10.
03/ 28110
IAT', .,CLAIArIo, , "eTeL/" SIrl - UIDArl '0. 1. eOLU.'IA
'ald'o~r D'~a'r.t' tor tbr Ad.,o"tr.t,rr "~ord
..r, aot brra ~OPI,d, bit .., b, r,ri",d .t t.,
'SIIA-"'10' V. CI1CA'0, 1L "
\
rInl AUrlOR DAti
Suprrtaod lab11~'tloa: Suplrtaad lab1lc,tloa 1f107/00
9347.3-011S. Saplrtaad
LDR 'uld, II: Or,rrll.
at 'C'A L.,d DI"o,.l
R"trl~eloa' (LD',}
Sup,rfaad Pabllc,eloa: Sup,rfaad 1abl,:,tioa "107/00
9347.3-0:1S, SUP'~/uad
LDR 'uld, 12: Co.plTla,
rJcb cb, C.llforal' Ll,e
AI,erlceloa, Uad,r LDRs
Sap,r/uad Pabllc.eloa: Sup,rtaad labll:.eioa "107100
9347.3-0J1S. Saplr/aad
LDR 'uldl 13: rrl,:.,ac
Sc.ad.rd, ,ad Nlc.,a.
rr:ba010" Rtqalrr.,acs
Uadlr LDRI
Suplr/aad Pabllc,claa: Sup,rtaad Publlc,cloa "/07100
9347.J-041S. Saplr/uad
LDR Galdr 14: Ca,plTJa,
"Cb cbr 8'..rr RI,crlc-
CJOa, Uadrr LDRJ
Suprr/uad Pabllc,tloa: Sap,r/aod Pabli:,clac IfID7100
9347.J-0515. Suplr/aad
LDR GUld, 15: D,c,r.,a,.,
Ibra LDI, Ir, A"ll~'blr
co C"CLA 'r,poa" A~cloa'
5aprr!a'd Pablic'CIOI: Sup,rlald labllc.tlaa "/D7100
'347.3-0'IS, Sap,r/a,d
LDR 'aId, "A: Obt.llll,
I 5011 .od D,brl' tr"c-
,blllC, ',rl"e, tar
RI"dl,l Actlaa'
Sap,rfaad labllc.tIOI: Sap,rtald "bll~'tioa "/J2IU
9347.;-0715, Saprr!aDd
;DI 'aId, 17: D,t,r.,ala,
~'a LD., .t, "l,r'Dc
ad Approprl.t, to C',eLA
UPOlIf ActJOU
PAI54012-"1a57: IIA "/JDIOO
ftlrlJau, SOIl
"POD', ACCIOD L",l.
-------
141" '0.
OJlUI'O
z
rzru
,..,d 00 'ot,atJ.l
Coat.IJa.at 'J,rltJoa
to 'rolad ..t,r: A
eOlp,.dJI. ot ',..p1,.
IP1/5.011."1001, li,t
A',',.I,at 'li4.a~' tor
Sup,rfaad rolal' II:
'arirol.,at.l ",la.tioo
'nul
"J/5.011."/002, 'J,t
A..,.,.,ot 'aldla~, tor
Sap,rtaad rolul' I:
Ba.'1 ',.ltb 'rlla.tJOI
I.cui {'lrt A}
.Ar., "C£AJAr10. , "ereLl" sIr, . a,aAr, 10. 1. COLD.'1A
"1d'l~r Do~o"lt, tor tb, AdlJIJ'trltJf' "~old .,
b", lot b"a eopJ,d. bot I" br 1"1,.,d .t tb,
DS"A."'10' r. CI1CA'O, 1L
AD riD'
DAr.
itA
"103100
I1A
"112/00
-------
The following index is a reference of documents which are
included in the Administrative Record Index. Attachment 4,
Index to Administrative Record,which can berev1ewed at the
Peabody Free Library, 203 N. Main Street, Columbia City,IN
46725.
The cross reference numbers are: 47,51,73,79,81,82,86,90,98,
120,,124,126,127,130,132,& 134.
-------
Mo.
~m
TBI~I OOCUNIITS All II TII ADNIIISTIATIVI RICOID IIDII.
ATT1CIK£IT '.11011 TO 10KIIISTIAT1'1 IICOID,
IRICH CAI 81 RI'11110 AT THI PIA80DT llEI LIIRARY
2.3 I. KA11 STRIIT,COLUNIIA CITT,II "725
t:lRANI Pl;IS DAfl TITLI AUTHCR RICI PIUT DOCUIlIT un DOCluun
2 87/.5/" Letter to Respoodeats' Bradler, USIPA CorrupOiduce
ProJect CoordlDator
reqardlDq aeeessary
actloDS to cOlplete
the relo'al at the sIte
871::/15 Addltloaal relo'a: .,rk Vllllil I. Hal: BUilD, USiPA corrnpoodeoce
2 881121 i 1 Kelo re: Izplaaatlon Budler, USIPA PUe Inorudn
of hazards Issoclated
nth tbe ute lD Its
present cODdltlon
'1 86:91/2i Relo'a1 :7erslqo~ f1eld ~oDqC. aSEr A Othu
.-
Dotes
86/08;' RespoDdea:s' :~cc~p: Other
of DOUDcarles of !o.~
:ODtallDated areas at
tbe Sl te
36 ! i .' e " 2 5 Relova~ ~verslqn: t1e1d ==ad.ey. C~!PA Other
Dotes frol 2/25/S7 .
9/11/87
252 liit71lt Co:!!ot Order betweea Pleadia,I/Orders
DSiPA IDd III lespoo-
deots to Cooduct sa
Illedlate lel~'al
236 WI'Il' Coaleot Order b't't'~ Pleldil,s/Orders
aSIPl aid 121 les~oldeDts
to coadoct a 11/13
II" Hittite Records ot Illte Reports/Studies
tUDuctloas It
hrDlllsu Oil
ton 1'15-1985
131 U/88/2. lisk AssessleDt t~r 8eriDek Assoclates.lac. ScaaloD,ISI! Reporta/Stadies
tbe IRR. hc.. colulb ia
Car I hduaa
86/83127 Trip report 00 ,eo- Jall:e hrtlett Reporu/Studies
phruell IUrur
cOldQcted br OSIPI
-------
~ . ~ .
19 i ~e
fHISI DOCUR£~TS ARI II TIE ADR1.1STIATIVI RICORO 1IDIJ.
ATfACH!IIT 4.1'011 fa AORI115fIAfl'l RICaRD,
IHICI CAI 81 RI'IIIIO Af fHI PIAIODY rR11 Lll~ARt
2.3 .. RAIl SfRllt.COLUR81& CIff.ll 46725
!.'lRAK' PAGES DAfl fIfU ADfI~I RlCHIUf DOCD!lIf nPl DOCIORBU
11 86/"/15 1'10,,1 ADI1,tical O.B. Blterills Report./Stadiu
Re.alt.: lelo'al
.ute urut
IDal,tlcal results
Dot CODtalDec Ie
KODthl, Reports
86119/31 Salpliaq results of R01 1. lestoa.lac. ReporU/Studiu
4/2/86 fAr .alpllnq ,f
abo'e-qrouad .torlqe
tuks
175 8i1l8l14 lelo'll KOD:bl, Reports SrOOtlla aac 8racl!, Reports/SUdtu
uader RIllS CODSeat ?rder
aDd DSIPA Vrlt:ea
responses to se'eral of
tbese repert!
5@ 87/93!@@ lour :ep~::!: 3/:.;:.'8~. ~e::al! i I~~y Reports/StadlU
3/ :3/87. aDd J/lI/87 0
leetly repor:! OD rele'al
overSlqc:
=2 87/17131 re~bDICll AS!lstan~! ~D'lreSpO~s!.!n~. Reports/Studies
relll ~Ar; 'lD'UODlieDtil
Response fe.I/IITI
Salpl~Dq results of
6/304!87 sl.pllaq
71 87'-18:18 Results of sl.p110q,t 3c:l~9' ICC [avlroDlee: ItporU/Studa.
C01UIDU CHr.IJ
la8i~lPll lelll ".7.
IDd 8
.
-------
~o.
~I~e
ADMIIISTRATIVI RICORD IIDll
IATMI WASTE OIL SIT!
COLJKBIA CITY,IIDIAJA
~:!RAKK PAGIS DATI nTLE AUTHOR UCIPIUT DOCUKUT TYPE DOCIUKBU
82/93/39 Letter r~: Adoptlot of Pic hrd.: EM: Brockaan,IRR,Iac. CorrupoaGuce
Aqreed Orde r
Eo'iroDaeotal KaDaceleo~
Board ot the State of
Ioduoa vs. IaTDe Vane
011 DivlSioo, IRR,Ioc.
82m/8a Letter re: litbdraval at ~lepltSC~, USIPA Brocklln,~RR,Inc. . Corruponduce
Part A (Protective
Filloq)
83/82/81 Letter re: Brockaan I. Beruel,Jr. at OPPJ, ISBR Corrupoaduce
at IRR,Inc. aad Beraaek Beranek Assoclatel
ot Beranek Alsoclates
aqreed that Beranek
would direct tbe
R1Sk Assessaeot tor
layoe ReclalatloD aad
Recycllcq, lac.
!3/92181 Letter r!: Tlo letters Lanoo"D'JoUD, Iblteleatber.Pros.At CarrespoDdeDce
dated 2/1/83 reqardlDq Secllln. n. al. ty
to tbe rlsk assessleat
aqreelu t
83/85/12 Letter re: ConfirllDq Kayar lalker,CltT Beraaek.IIRR,Inc. CorrupondeDee
tbat tbe City lill of Colulbla City,
perllt larae lalte Iadilaa
Recluation ud
lecTclll.,IDC. tbroa,b
tit 4irecu.D ad
laper'iliol 01 1eraaek,
to pllce I telt tell OD
City property DO closer
till 2. teet frol well
".Iith drilliaq rules
IDd re,uhtioDl
83115/13 1etter re: Coaceraed Area Reudut Oppy, ISBI Corrupoaduce
resldent cautioDS
1518 tbat Sil deatbs
bate occorred due to
caDcer,tbe reS1GeDts
lived by tbe Blue Rl,er
Ibere tbe drillloq
occurs, aid laDders if
tbe drilllDq aDd the
deatbs are CODDfcted
-------
! Ho.
H11~
AD"lR1SrRA~IVE RICaRD 11DII
IAT'I IASfl OIL SIrl
COLDH!lA C1fT,IIDlA'A
~!:rRAKr PAGES DArr !lrLl unOR . RlClnur DOCUUIr rnr DOClUlSlR
831'5/16 Letter r!: Had tehpboae 8era~ei,8eratet A111e. It%e1.1S88 Corrupoadeaee
coa'erlatl~cs tc
re,ol'e lisaaderstaadlaq~
tbat derelore1 arouad
tbe ISBB's role 10 tDe
Risk Assessle~t of tDe
IRR.lae. Site
83/95/16 Letter r!: Suuary of 8eraoek,Beraoek Assoc. Nayor Corrupoadeace 8
tbe lalt1al fl0dl0QS io lalker,Colulbia Cty
tbe Rilk Assessleo~ for
tbe COlulbla lell Yield
83118/1' Letter r!: SU.lary Beraaei.Beraoei AI.oe. Oppy, ISSB Corrupoadeaee
ntb respe~t to
salp11a9 tbe surface
of tbe IRR slte 'ltb
report of tbe
prelluaary
ia'ut19at1 ODS
84/811'3 Letter re: rDe lS8H Plchrd. II!!! Brockna.11I Correspoadeace l8
cOlpleted tne re'ie.
of tbe Rlli Assessleot
perforled by Beraaek
A..oeiatel,Iac. for IRR
84/'1/14 Letter reI Liquid Picklrd,II!!8 Broctau,IRR Correspoadnce II
Iadustrial laste BaDler
Peua
84/811f4 Letter re: ISII IUDI,ISlB DeH UDaCb, USIU CorrupoDduee 12
rl(DI.ted that 11,le
'I.i. 011 be coasidered
I' I priOrlt' CIRCLI
for fltare .appleleltll
taDd1a, .bieb la, beeole
I'ailable dur1a, 1'84
H/'l/ll Letter re: Coas1der CoatS,D.S. 80ase of Rep. RueielsbaDs,USIPA Corrupoadnee 13
tbe slte for future
',ppleleatil fuadlD'
'bleb la, beeole
arillable ia 1984
3 84/81/11 Letter re: IRR,lae.1 Lavsoo-Beehu, Ibiteleltber,Jr.,p.A Correlpoadeace 14
11St AlsesSleat Stud, Lawsoa ft.ll.
84/'1/26 Letter re: Ar!a resideot Barr!tt.rbe ~olulbac 8a11 RuekelsblDI,DSIPA Corrupoadeaee 15
-------
k
I; -
ADKIJISTRA!IVB RBCORD IIDll
IAYII IASTI OIL SITI
COLUKBIA CITY,IIDIARA
:ilRAKI PAGIS DATI !!!tI AUTR~R R!CIPIIiT DOCaUIT TYPB DOCIUUIR
coocerned !bout ~~~
delay in eleanlijq ~be
Indultr1aI lalte Slte
1n rhitley County
W81131 Letter ~e: Concernlnq Tboul,USIPA Coats,U.S. Houe of Corrnpndence Ii
tbe proqrell of the Rep.
clean up at tbe ra1ne
lute 011 SHe
W82117 Letter reI 10 resp~nle AduIUI. aSBP A Barrett,Tbe Colnlban Correlpondence 17
to letter dated 1/26/84 Ball
for obtainiaq 1aforlatlon
00 tbe layae laste 011
Site trol tbe USIPA aod
1Dqu1ry OD tbe hazlrd
naloatloD
84/87/16 Letter reI AqreHD1 Lauch.Beranek Assoc. SCU10D,ISBB Com spoDduee 18
to a pcsslble cOlpletloo
date of the R1Sk
Assessleot of rRp.,Inc.
85/82128 Letter reI Proposed 8r~cklan,VRR.Ine. Pickard,IIItB Corruponduce 19
to ha,e the IODltoriDq
lelll tested onee a
year by Idqlo Labs.
in Port Ilyne,ll,to
deterllDe Ihetber
any ot tbe cbellelll
Ire itlill' trol tat
Ihdq! ruiu
85/83/27 Letter reI CleaDup PIID 4. Streeter,ISB! BOlee,aSIU CorrupoDdenee 2t
for laYDe Reelalltion
II. .eeyelinq,Inc.
85/94/15 Letter reI lotificlt.ion CODstIDteIos.US!PA lenDell.Stlte 8ad,et Correspondence 21
of a pr1posed Superfund Aqcy
proleet t~ ~ funded
by tbe iSU A
85/84/22 Letter reI Tbe linilal Pietard,UHB 8roctl.D,IRR,lle. Carrupandenee 22
reqairelents ne!ded
in the Clelnap Plan
and tbe tile table to
follov, I1tb the
Rydroqeoloq1c In'eltl-
qatlon OatllDe lttacbed
-------
! ~o.
1~/ge
ADHIII3TRATIVE RECORD IXDEI
IAr.1 IASTE OIL SIrE
COLUMBIA CIrr,:.DIAIA
!/rRAK! PAGIS DArl rau AUTHOR RlcauJr DOCDKlJr rUI DOCn!BU
85/&4/23 Letter reI Request Kye rs, ISBR AdutQl,USIPA Corrupoadnce 23 '"
thlt th USKPA
iaitlate a Hllr!
for the IaYDe
Reclautioa ud
Recrclia9 (IPLI site
ia ColulAla City, IX
2 851&5/88 Letter reI lequest Stre~ter.IS8H Guerriero, UUP! Corrupuduce 24
for se'eral docaleDts
re,ardia9 the larDe
Reclautioa ud
Recrelia, 51 te
85/85/31 Letter re, Cleuap Plchrd, IBM8 BrocklaD,IRR,IDC. CorrUpoDdeDce 25
PlaDs for the laYDe
ReclnltioD ud
RecYCliD9,lDc. Site
ia Coluabu Car
85/88/17 Letter te: USIPA bas CODstaatelos,DSIPA IRR,lac. CorrupoDdeace 26
doculeDted the releases
or threateaed releases
at hazardous suh.taDces,
pollatuts ud
coatlliDaats at IHR,IDC.
lad i. pllaaia9 to speod
pablie faad. to eODtrol
IDd ia,estl,lte tbese
tireateaed relel.es
85'19'84 L.t~.r rt, USI'! II' Coo.tIDtelos,DSI'! III,lDe. CorrupoDdeaee 27
.,..4 ,.bIie faads to
tat. corr.cti'e actioa
il,01r10, relelse. or
t*rtlteD.d reI else' of
blzardoas jubltlaces,
pollutaats, aad otber
eOGtallaaats at IRR,Iac.
85/99/12 Letter reI laforlatioall LOD90,DSlPA PRP Corrupuduce 28
leetlo, 00 October 2,
1985 at 1:8' p.I. beld
br the USIPA
8S/] "" Letter reI A Ilst of DaSold,8erIDe~ Assoc. hek,ISIB CorrelpOldnce H
docaleDts .hicb 'e~e
SeDt t~ IS8ft dUIIDj
-------
! 10,
19/98
!DKIN~STRAT!VI R!~ORD IIDEt
IAYI! lAST! OIL SITI
COLDKBIA CITY,IIDIAIA
~/rRAKI PAGIS DATE TI!LI AUTHOR RlCIP!IIT. . DOCUKIU nn DOCI 0181 R
~!! ~o.plH:on ~t :h~
R1Sk A!!e!!I~O~ at th~
la,oe Reclalatlon ,
Recyelin9 Sw
85/16/28 Letter u: OSIPA uy Constantelos,USIPA IRR,Inc. Corrupondnce. 38
spe~~ public tunds ~o
tai, correcti,e actlon
in,01'ln9 releases or
threatened releases of
bazardous suhstanees,
pollutantl, and otber
contllioaltl at 'IR,Inc.
85111/31 Letter rei Request tor Ralanujal,Wood,ard- DUlold,Indp.Ctr.Ad.. Corruponance 31
docnlentl referenced Clyde Conlultants Reub
in the Rlil Aisessient
report
851l11tl Letter rt: Request tor Lee, GTE Berun,USIU CorreapODdeace 32
attendaDC~ list.lnvestl-
9ation report aDd a cop,
of the rlsk assesslent
prepared b, Beranek
Auocutn
85/il/t4 Letter re: Interested T. 81001/81001.81001, Lon90,USIPA CorrupoDde.aee 33
Part' ana Potentlally i Fleck
Responslble Part, are
lorkinq toqether to
initiate 10le reledial
actio, ud ue nlin,
for efteDlioi. .1
4uUil"
861t3/24 ~etter reI Ser.el 18 hker.IS1! 8rockllD,1R1 Corrnpondnce 34
a reiteration ot tbe
State' I pOlitioD on
tbe entorcelent of its
Aqreed Order '1tb tbe
operators of IRR aod
to uforl IRR ot ~e
cOlleqa~Dees of not
eooperat1n9
86/84/14 Letter re: IRR,Inc. LOD90,USIU Ball-Breed,Abbott,et CorrelpoDdence 35
Illediate Relo'al .al
Kealure Site Safet1
Plan
-------
! M~. i
99"91
AD!IIISfRAfIVr RICORD IIDEI
rAYII WAsrr OIL SIrl
COLOKBIA CITY,IIDIAIA
~K/n:Allr Pl'IS DArr nnr AuraOR RlCIPUJr DOCUKUf rru DOCIUIIUR
! 15/84/21 Letter reI DSIPA bas Coa.taatelol,USKPA IRR,Iac. Carrupoaduce H <>
doculeated tbe releales
or tbreateoed releasea
of bazardous substaaces,
pollutants and
coatalioaats at rll aod
is plaaoiaq to speod
publlC faads to coatrol
aad iafestiqate tbe.e
tbreateoed releases
"/l4/H Letter reI Volule I - CapUce, usru lalaoajal,loodvard-C Corre.poadeoce 37
Tecbaical Scope of lort lyde
aad Volale II - Istillted
Costs tor tbe 3/3/86
RIllS at tbe layae II.te
Oil Slte bafe been
refieled aad updated
8&'96119 Letter re: PrellliDary RalaouJal & BaroD, Cap 11 ce, DSIP! Correspoadeace 38
Assessleat ot RlSi loodvard-Cl yde
As.ociated vltD Dlolial Conul taots
luraa Coaceatracloos io
Soils litbia aad lear
Abaadoaed IaC10'.rator
layoe la.te Oil Iltb
lip. atUchd
. 86/87118 Letter re: Additioas to leruD, uSin La.,ell,Ge..ler,et.a Corre.poadeoce 39
tbe II/1S lort 1111 litb 1.
tbe 1[/15 'ort P111
Addl.dl.
t ""7/1' Letter re, Order i"led lduhs, USEP A Kllohf,IDlI Correspoadeace 4.
eOleerlil' tb. Ilfae
leeluacioa ADd
lec,clioq,Ioc. site,
pursulat to SeetloD
186111 of the CIICLA
of use
3 86/11/14 Letter re: III ~elofal lall,Breed,Abbott , Petersoa, USIP! Corrupoadeaee 41
Coasut Order Koruo
4 86/88/28 Letter re: ~oll'.ats 00 Bater,HI! CapItee, OSiPA Corrupoaduce 42
lrea. WblCb sbo~ld be
addressed iD up:oliaq II
Iltb laps atta:~ed
-------
Ra. T
~/"-
ADKIJISTRAfIV! RE:ORD IRD!1
IAtl£ IASTE OIL 51!!
COLOK!IA CITY,IRDIARA
Ill!!! Pl'15 DATE ruu AunOR RlCIPIur DOCUIur nn DOCIDKBlR
86/88/28 Le~ter rei RIACr '~rk Grfeoberg, !fcblav Looqo,USlPA Correspooauce 43
PIIG II for the II,De
lute Oil Cue
86119/'1 Letter re: !ddniooll Las.ell,Gessler.leIler, Beruo,DSlrA CorrUpOGdeDCe U
uguture piges H, a1.
reglrdlDg the voluDtary
uodertlilog of the
RI/fS for the IRR Site
2 81181/21 Letter re: Request hur, USIPA IRR,IDc, Correspoodeoce 4S
for loforlltioo a~d
copies of records,
delcrihlng IRR's
involveleDt rith tbe
release of batardous
.ubstaDces, pollutaDts
IDd cootallnaDts
87/04/13 Letter H: CoocHod Zickgrat,::q :f Braaley. USBPA Corrupooduce H
tbat IRR could ~a'e ColUlbla Clty,Iodiaoa
beeo overlooked by
the USEPA io regaris
to tbe '1I,llOg of
tbe IUDlcl,al vells
87/eS/t6 Letter to RespondeDtl' Bra41ey,DSIPA CorrespoDduce 41
Project coordioator
regardioq oecessar,
actlOO. to cOI,let!
the rllo,.l It the site
-
2 87/86/11 Letter rei lotityiDq CODstIDtelos.USIP! IIYDe 'lite Oil conupoDduce 48
111 t..t DO Ipecill
lotice letter lill be
ililed parlDIDt to
SectioD 122 at ~be
So,erfuDd lleodleDts
IDd R'lutboTit1:~Q~
let of 1985
2 81 ,,1/ 3& Letter rt: 10 r~s,oose Adaaius, DSn A COlts,a.5. J'D" of Corrupooduce .,
to ioqulry ~f 7'17/87 Rep,
coocerOlog :be
posSibIlIty of Co1ulbia
City belDg liable 15 I
forler slte ovo!r for
I portloD of th! costs
-------
N~. !
91J.
AD!IHISr~A~rVE RICORD IIDEI
IAYII IASTI OIL SITE
COLUK!IA CrTY,IIDIARA
gj'lR!!I PAGES DATE ruu AU~HOR RBCIFIUT DOCUllir UP! DOCIUUIR
of In,estlqatlnq aod
cleanlng ~p tD! IRR
Sae,
87/"/:3 Letter U: COIUIDU Adukus. USIFA SeDators Laqlr lad Corrupoadeaee . 58
City's request tor Quayle
coaslderatioa of d!
IlallUS 8ta~us,UDd!r
Sectloa 122(q) (11
of Superfuad Aleadleats
lad Relutborlzatloa Act
7 87112115 Add~loaal relo.al vork lilliu.. Hall . 8erna,aSlPA Corrupoadeace 51
88/81/28 Letter re: liDal Site Srooaiaa .tanra B radler, ann Corrupoadeaee 52
Bealtb aad Safe~y Plaa laquuruq lac.
aad Aleaded QAPP Paqes
layae Reclalatioa lad
ReeycliDq,IDC. RIllS
BBle31l6 Letter U: WaYD! Recla- AttorDeys tor Rleke Berua,USIPA Cornspoadeace S3
CorF,StaDadYDe, &
latloa 5 Recrclla;,Iac. a.R. DOllllelley &
Adllalstratl,e Order Sons COlplay
uader S!ctloD 186 ot
CnCLA
88/83/29 Letter re:!stilated J.Adals,Jr.,WlrzYII lareblll,Sidaef & Corrupolldeaee 54
Ilea'atloa Volules IlIqlllUtlDq Austlll
IRR SeetioD 1.6 Order
2 U/85/12 Letter reI Relp~a.e to Adutus, assp A Coats,U,S. Boa.t of CorrespODduce 55
re4.f.t for de alAl11S Rep.
Iittlel.lt ia the latter
ot 1II,Sapertaad Site
3 88/87/27 Letter re: Citf of Zietqrat, Cay ~f BerulI,USIPJ Corrupoadeaee 56
Co 1 albia Ci tr COlulcla C~ty.Cltf
later Suppl, Hall.Ia~una
88/88/13 Letter re: hSt~aq Cay Daqqett, USEH Zicl~rlt,City 1111 Corrupoadeaee 57
latu SUPPl,
U/ta/11 Letter re: Addeodul J.Adlls,Jr. ,VlrzYII 8radley, aSIPA Corrupoadeace 58
to RIllS Or~er 10rk IlIqlllunaq
Plaa Pbase II S:ope
of lort
-------
! la, 9
!9199
ADNIRISTRArIVI RI~ORD IID£1
IATII IASTI OIL SITI
COLUNBIA CITT.IIDIARA
tlrRAKI PAGIS DATI TULI AUnOR UCIPIIIT DOCUKIIT !TPI DOCIUKBH
88189182 J.Utu H: Ruedutloo J.Adns.Jr. .Vanyo Bradley, USIPA Corrupoadeace \9
Project Scbedule laYDe IDqueUlllq
ReclalatioD , RecycliDq
1" Order
.
8818918' Letter re:City of BeruD.USU! Ziciqnf.City CorrupoDdnce 68
Collllbia Clty Hall.e,C.II
later Supply
2 88/89129 Letter reI Request Nyers,Soller , BarDard P nbbakar , IDU CorrespoDdnce i 1
to obtalD asslstaDce
for ~be City of Colulbia
City
88J:81l8 Letter re: Revised J.Adals.Jr. ,larzYD Bradley, Unp! CorrespolldeDce 62
Project Scbedule IRR EDqlllHruq
SectloD 186 Reloyal
ColUIDla City,IDdiaDa
v1th chart attache~
88/:0125 Letter reI Surface later Zl:iqraf.City of Kanabada. IDU CorrupoDdellce 63
at KUD1clpa~ lell Pield Colulbla Clty, City
Ball,IDdiaDa
89181111 Letter reI BDv1rooieDtal Piciard,IUB Ib1teleatber,Off. of Correlpoade~ce 64
NaDaqeleDt Board vs. P.l.
raYDe lut! Oil
16 89119129 Letter reI BvaluatioD Pro sur , lDEK Hukus, uun Corrupolldnce 65
alld COllellts OD tbe
1R11' lade fro, IDIK's
Offictl of Air Kalla,t-
..~t,llt.r laDI,eleDt,
114 Solid IDd BI%ardolll
Illte laDI,eleDt,allo
eOI..lts frol IDII
89;18112 Letter rei USBPA aod Hyae,USBPA HilS, IInTD CorrupoDdnce 66
IDB! ARARI ~~r 1.,lIe III'lDeUlII'
ieclalatloD , RecT:llD,
site
89111122 Letter reI SUbllssioD DueskT , Bal:.IRR Byde. US!P! Corrupolldnce 61
of Draft Peal1b:litT Steer1D' COlllttee
Study Repor~: laYDe
Reclalatloll , Recy:lia,
Si te
82/!1/82 Kno re: Intorllat1oD Nuer. USHA VaDderlaaD.USIPA KnorlDdn 68
-------
q! 10. 11
'19/98
ADKIllSTRArIVI RICORD IRDBI "
IAYII IAsrl OIL SIr!
COLUKBIA CIrY.IRDIAIA
JI/TKAKI PAGES DArl fIfU AU~BOR UCIPun DOCDlllf UP! DOCIDIIHit
on tbe RCRA sta:~! vf
tbe sUDJec: facl1l:Y
"
82/12/13 IIno re: State,f Iblteleltber,Pro..At 1'lorlDdul U
Indiana 'So ID1:ley ty
Couaty
,
83/"/15 lIelo re: Propos!d BerlDei,Beranet A.soc. OPPf,ISBB lelO raDd III 78
lIodificatioa of IRR
Rist Assessleat Based
OD Prellliniry Results:
$lud" luiu
84/91185 Kelo re: Request tor P ictard, HIIB PUrsOD, Attf lelOraadlll 71
laforcelent Actloa GeD, IIIdiul
layae lute Oil
IDale, Couaty
86/96/11 lIelo re: layae Vaste theat,IDU Buct,IDU IInouadul 72
011 tork Plan 11th
ups at:achd
88/92117 lIelo re: Ilplaaatloa Bradley, DSBPA lile IInorladul 73
of bazard. asso:1ated
11th tDe site In ltl
present coadltl,a
88/96/18 ActioD /fno . Adlliu., USEPA CODstaatelo.,USI'A IInorudul 74
htborl%atloD to
Deooli,lte luads for
Sefea Superfuad Site.
75/88/27 larrlltf Dud Gltes,Attf a: LI' IRR,IIC. Other 75
83/84/21 IDdilDI COlleats 00 ISB! 8!raaet A.sociates Otber 76
la,De Illte Rlclllat10D
lad Recfclia, R!led1al
Act10D IIlster PIID
8S/te188 lork AssiqnJeDt AleDdleD: Otber 77
86/85/22 tayat Ia.te 011 Otber 78
Data Inract10n
Guide liD..
23 86/87/21 lelo'a1 o'er'19Dt field Lon,o, U:BPA Otber 79
notu
86/87/22 lort ~laD II Outline hcblav, IDe. Otbtr 88
-------
No. 11
~!G~
ADKIRISTP.A~IVB RICORD IHDB!
VAYII VASTI OIL SITI
COLUKBIA CITY,IRDIAIA
~/!RAKI PAGIS DATB T!~1.I AUTHOR RlCIPIIIT DOCUlIIT TUI OOCIUKUR
86/98,14 aespoud~nts' coucept Otber 81
of boa~daries of sOle
co~tali~ated areas at
the Sl te
J6 87/02/25 Relo'al o,erslqbt field Bradley, aStPA Otber 82
notes frol 2/25/87 .
9/11/87
16 84/92121 Recasal 10rl,Recolleuda- SOlce.USHA Green.Off. of Iqt PleadiDqs/Orders 83
tion of Plea Aqreelent Si1ppo rt
aud Aqreed lindlnqs of
Pact and aecoll~nded
Order
27 86/81/89 Adlinistratl'e Order aSEPA PleadiDqs/Orders 84
by Consent In The
Matter Of: Respondeats
;) 86/06/90 Adllnlstratl,e Order USBP A PleaalDqs/Orde!s 85
bT Cooseot 10 The
Katter Of: Respondents
252 86/87/19 Conseot Order b~t'~!o Pleadioqs/Orders 86
aSEPA and 181 Resp~o.
deDts to Conduct an
Illediate Relo'al
34 86/87/18 Adlinistratl,e Order DSn A Plead1Dql/Orderl 87
br COAI~Dt In tbe
latter Otl atS~OQdeltl
9 86/"/14 ItlfoDdeDts' ObliqltioDI Re~pondent! i USE?A PleadiDqllOrdtrl 8&
aldtr AdliDl.trati,e
Order by Con.eDt for
Itlo,.1 letioD at 'arDe
leelal.tioD i RecTcll09
°111° CIRCLA Slte
113 87/88/i4 AdllDistratl" Order Adalkus.iSIFA ReqloD V Plead1Dql/Orderl 8'
by ConSeD t
In tbe JItter of:
"Ylt ReclalltloD
and Recyeliuq.lnc.
P rocteduq uDder
Section 122 I a! aDd
(dl (31: Ie: RLPS
:36 87/98/14 Cooseot Order bety~eu PleadiDql/Orders "
-------
;e Ro. 12
.n/"
ADKIIISTRAfIVI RICaRD IIDE% -
IAYII IAStl OIL SIfl "
COLUKIIA CltY,IIDIA.A
31/1RA"1 PAGIS DAtI fULl AunOR RlCIPIUt DOCDllllt rnl DOCIUIIBU
USIPA and 121 Respondents
to conduct a RI/FS
93 87/18/14 AdllDistriti,e Order OSEPA PI.ldia,./Order. '1
by ConseDt RI:RI/FS
10 tbe Katter ot:
nl.IDC.
47 88/82117 AdllDlstratl,e Order USEPA Pleldio,./Order. '2
Pursuact to Sectioc 186
ot tbe COlprebeasl,e
la,iroclectal Re.pocse,
COlpecsitioa, aad
LlaDility Act of 1~8' ':
-------
Xo. 13
Q 'U
./
ADMIIISTRATIVI RICORD IID£1
IAYII IASTI OIL SITI
COLUKBIA CITY,IIDIARA
!/!RAM! PAGIS DAT! TITU AuraOR Rlcnun DOCDMIIT TUI DOCIDMBlR
21 82/85/86 IDdiaDa S~a~e Pollce Oas~ead,Io'estlqator BrockaaD,IRR,IDC. Reportl/Studas lit
IDitial Case Report
82/85/18 Indiana State Pollce h~OD!,ctflcH IaYDe lute Oil Reportl/ S tad i e 8 181
SuppleaeDtal Case
Report: ID'lrooleDtal
Act Violatioo .
82/19/25 ! backqroDDd sD'lary ReportS/ Stadies 182
OD li,at laste Oil
Site, Coluabla City,
Indiua
82/121 ee Report OD the cODdltlons US!?A Reporti/Stlld1u 1t3
at 11stlOq lDd the
Statu
62 83/QlI13 Proposed Risk AssesSleat V.8eraaek,Beraaek USBPA,Re910D V RepOrti/Stuaiu le4
for laYDe Recla.atlon & Assocates
R e cy 1 c lD q , 10 c .: 0 1 Ulb 1 a
C~~y, I:dana
8);81/@1 KODthly lork AsslqDI!nt To~zke,rSP~,:H2K Hill Reporu/Studu8 185
Status Report
lTechDlcall, Period:
JaDuar, 1983
12 83/93181 Dratt:Re'le. ot Beranek Reports/Studies 1"
Proposal
2 83"3111 10Dtbly lork lssiqDaeDt Tot%ke,r.SPK,~B2K Bill Reports/ Sudiu 111
Stttlll Report
(hchllicd). Period:
hbrury U83
59 83/e3/28 Kalter Plan tor Risk BeraDek 1sso:~.tes Reports / S udi u 118
11sessaeot at Ilyoe
leciallt:cD and RecyllDq,
Inc.
83/um 10Dthly lark AsslqDleot ro:~it,"~'M.:B2K Bill Reportl/Stlldies 189
StUDs h¥crt
(Technical), Penod:
2/25/83 . 3/24/~3
83/95/e2 Statu8 of IRR R1Sk BeraDek,Be!aotk 1110C. Reports/Studiu 118
AsseSSIut
-------
'e 10. 14
U/ge
ADK1BISTRATIVI RICORD IHD!:
IAtl1 lAST! OIL SIr!
COLOKBIA CITY.IIDIAIA
:!/lRAKI ~AG!S CAT! nru AUTHOR R!CIPIIJr DOCOll1l1 nPI DOCIDUIR
83/15/11 KODtDly lark AsslqDleot 8ernrra Reportl/Stldin III
Statas Report
(TecDDlCal), Period:
3/25/83 . 4/24/83
83/e5/zj lark SDeets aD differeD: Koepper KU.A,aSIPA - l.q100 Reportl/Stadiu 112
t.st resalts for .'ter, V
alr aDd fire for II,De
lute Oil
4 83/um IRR ProJect S~atus BeraDek A,soc1ates,lDC. ReportJ/Stadiu 113
Report
83/88/89 Statos of IRR RISk BeraDet lS!OC1ates,Iac. Reportl/Studiu 114
AssuneDt
8~/e8/12 Resolts at ADalyses Koepper O'uu,OSrPA - Reportl/Stlldiu 115
aD qrollDd aDd surtlee ReqlOD V
later, au, aDd tire
aad erplos10D on layae
lute 011
127 83/88/22 Piaal R!ledlal ActIon csa Hill USBPA Reports/Stadies 1H
/laster P laD for
layne Reclalat10a
aad Reeycliaq S:te
29 83/'1111 SPCC Iasp.c:10D lield lattiD aad StofferlAa, IRR.1IIc. Reportl/Studiu 111
Sbut Iupeetors
84/fl/15 Stltll' ot IRI IlSt Berlaet 1"oeilt!. IeporU/Stadiu 118
ll1n.aut
84/82/16 .Ict,l.boll.e reca.a1 80ic., unu OPPY,!SIB ReporU/Stadin 119
for 11'0' II.t. Oil;
Ittleblfots 1 , a
131 84/88/28 Rist A.S.ssleDt for aeraDet A.sociate.,lac. ScaaloD,ISBI Reportl/Stadiu 12.
tbe fRa.lac.,ColuIDla
City,Iadiau
21 86"118' liaal COllllaity Calp Dresser' Kclee IDe. aSl'A Reportl/Stadin 121
Relatioos Plaos tor
rayae lute Oil
51 86/83/87 loritltloD tor BIds lo~dvard -Clyd. ReportllStadin 122
tor Drillioq aad CODsal:aDts
/loDltoriDq lell
-------
! ~o. 15
19m
ADKIJISTRATIVI RSCORD IIDEI
VAYIS VASTS OIL SITI
COLO!BIA CITY,IIDIAJA
it:PRAKS PAGIS DHI TULI AUTHOR RlCIPIIiT DOCUItIlT TUI DOCIOKUR
IOStallnion at
IRR
56 86/83/13 Proposed Site Safety C.P.. Materlals Corp. Breed,Abbott, i Report./Stadie.. 123
PlaD for IDlvrooleD~al KorqaD
CODtrol Project at
Vayae Reclalatlon ~
RecTclloq,Inc.
ColUlbla City,IN, Site
86/93/27 Trlp report 00 qeo- Janw Bertlett Reporti/Stadiu 124
pbTSlcal sumy
cODducted bT USBPA
193 86/85/81 Site Safety Plan f~r C.H. Kateruls Corp. Breed,Abbott,i leportl/Studiu 125
ID'lroDleDtal Coatrol !orqu
ProJec~ at Vlyne
ReclalatlOQ i RecT~lloq,
IDC. Colulbla C:ty,IJ,
Site: Appendices I.P
.. !6,~91:5 Relo'al Aoa~yt::al C. F.. Kater:a~s Reportl/Studies 126
..
Results: Reaou:
us:e stren
aoalytlcal resu:ts
Dot eODtalDed :n
KODtbl y Reports
8 86/89/3' Sa.pllDq resul:s of Ror P. IeSton,Inc. Reporta/Studiu 127
4/2/8' TAT sl.pilDq of
Ibo,e"qrouDd storlqe
taDka
19 861111.. I.~tbl, lork 1..i9DleDt Rllna]1I Reporu/Stadiu 128
Statll Itport
(l'c~liclll 7185 - 18/86
175 86111114 lelo'11 IODthlT Reports SrooDlaD and Bradley Reporli/StadHs 129
aoder RIllS CooseDt Orde~
IDd USIPA IrltteD
respoa.e, to "f,rai ot
thue reportS
58 87193118 lODr reports: 3/2-11187, "Heal!' Eddy Reportl/Sludies 138
3/13/87, aDd 3/28/87 "
"tily report. OD relo'a1
o,uuqbt
87/87/88 rls IV KODtbly Vork KetcaH i Iddy Reporli/Stadiu 131
IsslqDleDt Status
-------
~! 10. 16
&!I/9I
ADKINISrp.A~I'1 RICORD IIDEI
IAfl1 IASTI OIL SITI
COLUMBIA CITf,IIDIAI!
~rRAKI PAGIS DATI TITLE AUrROR RlCIPIUT DOCUKUT rUI DOCIUUIR
Repor~: July 1987
11th Utichluts
22 87/87131 'echolcal Assistaot Teal IDvirespoo!e.IDc. Report./Studie.. 132
(fAfl/ID'lroDleDtal
Re,poDse feil (IRr)
SalpllDq Results of
6/3-4/87 salpllD9
3 87/88/11 TIS IV KODthly lort htcalt i Iddy Reportl/Stadiu 133
AS.lqoleDt Status
Report: !U9ust 1987
'ith attachleDts
71 87/88118 Results of salp:iD; of Icol09Y aDd ED'lroDleD~ Reportl/Studies 136
Colulbu City.IN
IUDlclpal ,ells ".7.
aDd 8
87/illee TIS IV KOD:hly lork ~ttCilf i Eddy Reportl/Studiu 135
ASl19Dleot Status
Report: 10,eIDe: 1987
87/12188 TIS IV KODthly Wort IttcaJf i ! ddy ReporU/Studiu 136
AII19DleDt Status
Report: Decelber 1987
'itA lelo attacAed
88/81/18 flS IV KODtblJ lort letclit , Idd, .eport.lStudiu 137
A..19DleDt Status
leport. JIDuarJ 1'88
43 88/11/28 '1..1 Site Be.l~b In Re,orti/Stadiu 138
In Sahtr Uu
1...4111 I.,e.t19Itlol
lid '.I.ibi11t, Study
223 88/82/11 liD.l Quality AssurlDce ..rtJD ID91DeerlD9,IDC. IHI Sturu, RepOrti/Stadiu 1H
ProJect Pl.D 101PP/ COIIl tUe
1',De leclllatloD IDd
IeCJCliDt RIllS
Colalbil CitJ,IDdiIOI
183 88/84111 lort PlaD: CIRCLA Rlete Corp, StIDldYDe, IRR IeporU/Stad1u 14.
SectloD 1.6 lelo'li IDC., R.R. DODDelle, i
Order, Mayoe SODS COIP'O" .od
Reclu.tloo ud hutrul fool i
RecJcllD9,Re,islOD: StalplD9 CO..IDC,
-------
k 17
~m
ADKIRIST~ATIVI RICORD 11Dll
IATII VASTI OIL SITI
COLDKBIA CITT,IIDIAIA
!JrRAKB PAGES DAf! fULl AUTHOR RlCIPIllf . DOCUlIiT Ttn DOCIOUIR
Draft
88196'" VR1 lork Plao: Drat: la,oe Rec1alatloo . hportl/Studiu 1U
Report vlt~ JOdlfl:atloo aDd ReqCl1Dq
aUac~unu
:9 88/98'/19 Addendul to RI/15 Vartyn Bnqlneerl~q,Inc. hportl/Stud1u 142 .
Order lork Plan
Pbase II Scope of
Vork for IRR
132 88/98/19 IRI 9&n itlhnu 1 'artYl lu,ineerloq Reportl/Stodiu 143
,it~ Appel;l,el I - (
165 89114198 C!ICLA Sectloa 1" lartya !aqlaeeriD9 IDC. IRR Sectioa 11' itportl/Stad1u 1U
Relo'a1 Or~er VaYD! Respoadts
~eelalatl~~ Rec~~li~;.
Inc.
254 89/e6!89 llul Ruedul lartya Baqlceerloq IDC. VRR Rl/rS PRP _roap RepOrti/Stlld:!1 US
ID,estlqatloo Report
IRR RIm Sa!
Co1uI~la City, :R
Vo1uu ! of III
368 8 9i@6/ ee flul Ruedal lartya Baqloeerloq IDC. IRR Ri/rS PIP Group Reportll Studiu 146
ID,estlqatloa Report
IRI RIfFS SHe
tolllibia tltT,!)
falne II at III
..
181 8911"" liDtl lepart Reaedill IlrtTa loqlaeerlD9 lac. IRI II/IS PIP _roap lepartl/Stadiu 141
IDfuti,ltin
nt IIIlS Site
e.laliil CitT,I.
'al... III of III
181 89/.'/'7 laTae lecla.atloD , SiJoo, USSPA Byde,USIPA-Reqioa' Reportl/Stadiu 1U
Recrclioq Bloloqical
Auusuot OArP
" 89198"8 Alttrtati,es Arrar Valtyn Saqlneerlaq,Iac. VRR RI/rS PIP Graap Ieparu/Stlld1u W
Doclllut
-------
[tl~ 10.
'll8i/"
~~~r
!::eqrated Risk
Infarlatloa Systel
(IRrS! [A COlputer-
!aud Hulth Ruk .
rafarlatiaa Systel
A'illable rhroaqb
(.Mall .. Irocbur~
o~ Ac:ess 11 ;acluded]
111 ';lde far IdeatlfYia9
tle~lp Alteralti'es It
!azardoas laste Sites
loa Spills:Biolo91cal
fruueat
raqlaeerl~q Haadbock
Ear Hazardoas laste
~aclaeratlaa
SedillDt Salpllaq QualIty
Assuraace User's Galde
Groaad.later Proteetioa
:traten
!ealtl Iffe~ts Asse.sleDt
locaal~ts (58 Chelicil
!ro.tilesl '01 28:
~t~lt,!rseaic,
ts~!JtQI,8arial,
:ura!al 'frene, Cldilll,
:ar~ retracaloride,
:UarabeauDe, Cblordlle,
:hlarofon. Coal fin,
:opptr, Cresols. Craaide,
Inr~ 1,1.Diealoroetaaat.
.,2-DicblorotthaDe:Vol 2':
.,1.Oiebloroetbrleae,
.2-DteblorottbrleDe,
:U.1.2.DicUoroetbyleae ,
U,lIitauae,' 1 ,eo 1
tbtra, aelacalorobeazeae.
!I1cblorobutadieae,
~ItcbloroerclopeatadieDe.
!%tflleAt carollal. Iroa
~d COlPOUDdsl, lereDr"
!c:rl Itarl KetaDe,
!t4fleae Chlorlde,
IAiRI VAsrl OIL,COLOMBIA ~IrY.IIDIARA
GUIDAICS DOCOMSRT5 rOR rHE ADNIII5TRATlil R!CORD
HAV! lOT BISR COPISD BUT MAY Sg RIVIIIID AT rH~
. aSIPA RIGIOR V.CHICAGO.IL.
Aur~n
DA~!
ORn
Paclfic RI Lab. Rlalere/CIRL
Boaoer/MoDsanto Research C,rp. 81/'9/81
our
Barth'Starks/a o!
'V,BrOtD/ORD/IARD
84/15/81
Office of Grouad.late{
Pro tectloa
84/88/11
ORD/OBIS/ICAO/OSIIR/OIRR
84/""1
-------
Paqe Ro.
81/85/98
VA?II WASTE OIL.COLU~BIA CIfY,IIDIARA
GUI~ARCI DOCUKllrS FOR TH£ ADKIIISTRATIVI RECORD
BAYI R01 BEll COPIED BUT ~AY BS P.liIIVID AT Tal
USIPA RIGIOR Y,CarCAGC,IL,
nnB AU1~OR DAn
hpbtbahat. Rickel.
PentachloropbeDol. Pbea.l,
Pbenantbreoe: Yol 38:
Polycblorloated Blpbeoyls
(PCBS I , Polycyclic
Arolati: Bydro~arboDs
(PARS!. PyreDe.Seleoial
(aDd COlpouodsl, Sodiul
CyaDlde. Sulfarlc Acid.
2.3. 1.8-TetracblorodibeDto-
p-DioI1D, 1.1,2,2-Tetra-
cbloroetbaot, Tetra-
cbloroetbyhDe. !olane,
1.1. 2-TncbloroetDaDe.
1,1.1-Trl:hloroetbaDe,
!nchloroethylne. 2. 4, S-
!rlch!oropbeDol. 2,4.6-
tncbloropbeool, Tr.uleot
CbrollUi. VlOyl CbloIlde,
"leoe, ZlOC (and
,poDDdsl. rPA/SU/H6/
118H58
Re'l!' of Io-Place OStIR/OIRR/ORD/RIRL B4m/19
~reatleDt TecbDlques
for CODtallDated Sarface
SOlla-Yol. I: hcbolC&l
lulua tlOD
Re'le- ot ID-Place Sil,/Jl1 ilIac. alrilef/KIIL Ull1Jt1
rreltleDt Tecbolques tor
CODtlllDated Surface
SOlls-Yol. 2: 81ciqroQod
IDforlatloD tor ID-Sits -
rrenleDt
Field StaDdard OperatlDq OIlR/BRSO 85/11/11
Procedures Raoual '4-Site
Intry
Field StaDdard Operatloq OERR/BSC~ 85"1111
Procedures !aDual '8-Alr
Suuulluce
Field Staodard OperatiD9 ~IRR / BRSD 85/14"1
- ~edures RaDual "-Vori
d
Yleld S~aodard OperatlDq OSR~/HRSD 85114/81
-------
Paqe 10.
91195/99
rrru
Procedure. "aaual '9-S1te
Safety Plaa
GUlaaDce DOCUI!ot for
Cleaaup of Surface faak
aDd Drn Situ
ReRA/elRe1A Decisloas
!ade oa Reledy SelectloD
RCRAICIRe~A DeclSloDS
Made oa Aeledy Selectloa
[SecoDdary RefereDcej
POIICY 00 rlood PlaIDS
aad letlaac Asse!sleats
for CIRCLA Actloas
~~rlcoloqy Handbook
:11 GUlde tor
~L~.~awa~er SalplIoq
:bellcal.PhYSlcal i
Sloloqical Properties
of COlpouods Preseat
at Hazardous Iiste
SHu
eIRC~A COlplilDce 'itA
Otber ID'lroDIIDtll
Statuu
lodlDqerleat AlseSsleDt
GUldlAce
ladlaqerleDt Alleslleat
GUldlDce [Secoadlry
Reterncej
rleld Screeoio, tor
OrqaDlc CoatlllDlots
ia Silplu frol
Hlzardous Iiste Sites
3aadbook for I'aluatlaq
1eledlal AC:10a fech-
loloqy Plul
IA111 IASfE OIL.COLU~SIA ClrY.IIDIAIA
GDIDAleS DOeD"llrS rOR YRI AD"II1SfRAYIVI p.teoRD
HAV! lOT BIll CO?!ID BOY MAY Sg IIVIIIID AT rag
USIPA RIG101 V.CHICAGO,IL.
AUTHOR
OAT!
eDK'loodvard.Clyde/lestoc/Joba 85/15/28
SOD
lilpatrick/CJlpliaoce
Braach, alP!
"8511'/24
lilpatrlck/C?lpliaace
Braach,OlP!
85/86/24
Hedela~ Jr.,V.I./OIRR Lucero
G/OIPI
85118/.1
LIfe
SYSteu, lac. ,Yrbursh/OIFI
85/18/81
Barcelooa,".J./I~'S
ScaltIORD/IR~
85/H/II
ellieat Asso~lates.lDc.
85/19/27
Porter,~,I,/OS'11
85/1'/'2
Porter,J.I,/OSrll
85/11/22
Porter,J.I,/OSIIR
85/11/22
RottIID.B.I./IDS Corp
Carter ,K/NDIR
86/84/82
CulllDaae Jr.
et,al,'U.S,C'I/I[;
86/96/11
'"
-------
Paqe 10.
91/15 "I
IAYII IASTE OIL.C'LUKBIA CITY.IIQIARA
GUIDAICE DOCD"II~S lOR THI lDKllISTRATlVI RICOP.D
BAYI JOT BEll COPIID BUT KAT BE RIVIIIID AT THE
051PA RIGIOI V.CHICAGO,IL.
!!TLI AOTHOR DATI
ATSDR Bealth 1.,et.lent. Dept of Heal:h aAd HUlaA W'" 16
on IPL Si tea Serv/USDR
GUldelines for Kutaqenlc- IPA W19124
itT Rl.k A.SeISleAt
IFederal Reqlster.
SepLelber H. p. 361861
Guidelines for CarcinoqeD IPI 8' 189124
Ri.k llles.leAt IFederal
Reqi,t.r,Septelber 21,
198', p. 33992)
GuideliDe, for Izpo,ure If A 86"'/21
As,e,slent (Federal
Reqlster,Septelber 21,
1986, p. Hew
!ilD.S for the IPI 86119/21
Se~lth Ri.k Assessleot
of Cbellcal Klztures
(Federal Reqlster.
Septelber 24, 1986,
p. 348H)
GuideliDel tor Health SPI 86/"/24
A..eDSleot of Suspect
De,elopleDtal TOlicaots
(Federal Reqi.t.r,
Septelber 24,198',
p. 34.281
SuperfDDd Public Healtb 01l1/0511R 86111111
l'alultioD laDual
Test Kethods for I'al- OSIIJ 86/11111
uatlRq Solid laste,
Laboratory IIDual
PhYllcal/Chellcal
Metbods,Tbird Idition
l'ololel lA,IB,IC Ind
11)
',I Guiduce on Porter,J.I./OStER 86/12121
~" . tUDd Se lectlon
o! Ruedy
-------
rIVe 10,
tllfS/9I
IAYII IASTE OlL.COLUK8IA ClfY,lIDIA.A
GUIDA.CI DOCU"II~S lOR TSI ADftIIISTRATIVI RECORD
BAYI lOT 8BII COPllD lOT KAY BE REVIIIED AT TBI
aSIPA RIG101 Y,CHICAGO.IL.
r.r..1 AUTHOR DArI
"
altl Omllit, Objecti,es CDK le~eral Prograls 87/'3"1
far Releaial Respo~se Co rp 10IRR IOIf?1
A~'ltlfS: De'elople~t
Process
altL Omllit, Ob,ectl,es CDI! lederal Prograls 87/.3181
f~ l'l,dial aespo~.e Corp/OIiR/OIi'1
ActL'itles: Izalple
SCtllrlOr 11/15 !eti'l-
:ler at 1 Site 11th
C~lAlted Soil.
ud; GroliAdlatfr
!101l Gaidance tor the Porter/OSIIR!OERR,ATSDR 87/'5/14
CO~rU1Aat10n ot ATSDR
Health !.sesslent
!et1'ltles 'l~b the
Superfund Reled1al
? ca.c.!S!
IP!'s Ilplelentation ot Thous.L.!./!PA 87"5/21
::e Superfand Alendlent.
aad Reaathor1zat1oD Ac~
of US,
i«idelines a~d Speclfi- ORD/Qaality AssuraAce K91t 8711'''1
:at10A. tor PreparlD9 SUff
2uality AssuraDce
frog:11 DoealeDtatioD
.ad Disposal £f'ge.t/GIII, ~'ctto'C'PI '7/88/11
'U:nr::10U
!I,dial Actl0D Co.ting ~R!/CB2K 87/1'/81
~ocedares !anual Bill/ORD/KlIL/OSrKa/OI..
COlpeDdUI of Superfund . OIiR/OIPI 87/12181
.eld Operatl0ns letbods
.hocator, Data Vall- BI!,ler/Ylar , Co/SKO/lPA 881121.1
.tW 1uctioaal DII/HSID
ld!11nes for '.a1-
tII~ Or91n1cs ADalyses
~rtllAd Irponre OIRR 88/14/'1
!fIUUt Kanual
:ern GaHuce on Por~er.J.I./JS'ER 88/'5/16
-------
Paqe 10.
81/85198
IAYII IA5rt OIL,COLnMBIA CIrY,IIDIARA
GUIDAICB DOCU!IIT5 lOR r81 A~MIIIsrRArlil RICORD
RA'I lOT I1II COP liD Inr MAY IE RIVIIIID AT rBE
U51PA RIGI01 V,C!ICAGO,IL.
faLl AUTHOR DAU
Potentiall, Respons1ble
Party larticipatioD 1n
Reledial ID,estiqat1ons
aDd leasibility Staaies
" COllunlty Relations in OUR 88m/61
Superfund: A Handbook
(Interil Version I
Laboratory Data Vall- IPA DRI/8leyler/Viar , 88181/81
dation lunctional Co/5!O/B5ID
GUlaeliDel for I'll-
altinq Inorqln1cs
AnalystS
CBRCLA COlpl1clnce ,itb OIlR 88/88188
Otber Lavs Ranual
ll~ld ScreeD1D9 Methods OIRR fHSID 88"91.1
"'.!loql User's Guide
recbooloqy Screeoloq 0511R/OIIR 88189181
;ulde for rreatlent at
CBiCLA Soils aua Sluaqel
GUlaaoce tor Conductioq 0511R 10liR 88/18/'1
RI/~5 under CIRCLI
nser's ;aide to tbe OIRR/CLI Sllple !,It, Otf1ce 11/12111
Contract Laboratory
Proqru
Reqlon , SaperfuDd ;ade,R./IPA 89114/1'
Reledy SelectioD Procell
-------
Paqe Ro.
8!/88/98
AD"IRISrRArI~1 RICORD SAKPLIRGfDAfA IRDII
IAtl! IASTI OIL SITI
DOCDK&RTS ROT COPIID. KAY SI RIVIIIED AT TII
USIPA RIGIOR V OFFICES. CHICAGO. ILLINOIS.,
JAU T Uti WTROR RICIPIUT DOCUUn Tnl
.)
8tf.9f!6 Industrial arqiele lJdustrial I,qieoe Laboratory IRR,Colulbia City SlIplhq/Data
Laboratory Analytlcal
Reqaest
3e/:2f8~ Ivaluatloa of 'RR.lnc. GUlado~,ldqlo La~,Iac. Lal.on,Duntea,et. Sliplin,/Data
slud,e salple lib a1.
reports requested by
158ft and USrPA
81/17f3t later Salple SlIphnq/Data
Ideatificatlon Sbeet
82ftS/l' Chellcal Ilalinatioa ISB! Colulbia City later Salplin,/Data
of later Dept
83ft.!!: Locatloas for Borinqs ISBI Bernek,OPPf i Sliplin,/Dau
for R1Sk Assessleat Scblldt
83fe5/'~ Corr!spoadeace re: Doyle,Chlef ~f ISBft hrnek,hunet Sliplin,/Dau
Appro,al of the attacbed Auoe.
Outllae for ~he
Assesslent Plan re,ardia,
the sOl11 bOlln,
locatIons and overall
plaa
83/'5/13 Te.t Drillinq Report, Peerless-Midlest,Inc. and IDII III Slipliaq/Data
later 'ell Record and
Log
83/'5/2' rest DrilliD9 leport, Peerless-Midlest,Iae. aad IDIR IRR SalpUa,/Data
later le11 leeor. lid
Loq
83/15/25 Test DrilllDq Report, Peerless-Midlest,Iac; and IDIR In SlipliD,/Data
later le11 Record aDd
Log
83/'5/27 later lell Iteord i Peerless-Kidlest,Iae. aad IDII IRR Saaplia9JData
Loq
83/1'1'2 Test Drliliag Report Peerles-Kidlest,IDc. In Slapl1D9JDaU
Iltb later lell Loq
83/86/.S Cbellcal IlaliaatloD IS!! ColalDia City later SalpliDq/Data
of later Dept
-------
Page 80.
81lt8/98
ADMINISrRATIVB ~BCORC SAMPLIIG/CATA 11012
IATMB IASTI OIL SITB
DOCUMENTS NOT COPIBC, KAT 81 RIVIBIID AT THI
USBPA RIGIOI V OllICIS, CHICAGO, ILLINOIS.
OAT! TITLB AUTHOR RBCIPIBn DOCUIIUT TTPI
83/86/21 Corre.pondence re: ~eranei,8eraDek Assoe. OpPT, ISBB Sliplin9/Data
A tiO toot split spoon
salple di'ided Into In
upper toot and 10ler
foot. for tbe IIIrtace
area
83/'6/28 Corre.pondence re: 8erlnek,8erlnek A.sociite. 0PPf,ISBB SlipliDg/Data
SUlllrf of leeting
regardin9 the risk
IsseS.lent and tbe
project .tatns report,
11th Ground,ater rl01
quutlon.
83/.6/28 Letter re: Litbolo91C Beranek,Beranek Aseoelates OPPf,IS88 Sliplin9/Data
anal1s11 ot tbe bore-
boles drilled on tbe IRR
)/'6/38 Correspondence re: DOfle,15BH Bu lDel, Be rane k Snplin9/Data
Kod1ficatioll of Assoc.
atrlte9f for lalpl1n9
tbe IRR sludge trencb
83/87/28 Synthetic Volatile USIPA-DrlllkiD9 later Section SuPl1D9/Dau
Orglnic Contalinaot
Sur,ey 1011Yli. leport
83/17/27 Corre.pondence reI Dolre,UBI 8enuk,lenut Salplin9/Dul
In a9reeeleot litb the luoc
alterltioo ot teltl for
tbe old bitt Irea a..
the poetpoo....t .t
te.t. tor ai9rati.. of
leacbate trot t.e .la9de
ruioe
83/17/29 Corre.pondeoce reI 8fraAek,Ieraoek !.soclates Guiodoo,1d910 Slipli09/DIU
SI.ple. tlten io tbe ~lb,IDc.
.10dge rl,ile .hould
be pruened by
retrigerat1oo tor
preplutioo
"1/88/8' Corre.poodeoce re: Berao!k, Beranek Associate. GUIII,A.D., SuPl109/D1U
Results ot tbe dral Little,IDe.
dOID tut uo 00
8/1/83 at 2, lit 9a1100.
-------
Paqe Ro.
U/es!98
AD~IIISTRATIVI RICORD SAKPLIIG/DATA IIDII
IAYII IASTI OIL SITI
DOCtK!IT! lOT COPIID, KAY SI RIVIIIID AT TII
nS£PA RIGIOI i OFFICES, CBICAGO, ILLIIOIS.
DAn !!!LI AUTBOR RIC I P lilt Doca.IIT TTPI
per 11nute for Sll hours
.~
83/88/'9 Correspondence re: Berane, ,Beranek Associates GUlla,A.D. SlIpl1Dq/Dita
Results of the dral Llttle,hc.
dOln test,I1th graphs
attached
83/1'/18 CorrespoDdence re: Beranek.BeraDei Associates' OPPf, UIB Slipliaq/Data
Salplinq tbe slrtace
ot tbe IRR site aad
a report ot the
prelil1nary la,est1-
qatl0DS
83/18/18 Analytical Results RKA Laboratory BeraDek Alloeiltel SlipliDqlhta
83/11/17 Correspondence re: Data Guna,Artbar D. Little, IDC. 8eraDti,BenDei SlipliDg/Data
a'ailable for anllysls Alloc.
and 10ler aqaifer test
results, 11th qraphs
attacud
83/11/17 CorrespoDdence re: Gusla,Artbur D. L1ttle,Inc. Beuui,8euuk Supliaq/Data
Analysls ot poteatlal Auoc.
lo,eleot ot a plrticle
ot later located directly
below the slud,e rl'10e
83/11/23 CorrelpondeDce re: 8011i0ger,lll Laborltorr 8oarae,BtuDti Sllpliog/DIU
Relults tor tbe IlalYlil Alloc.
ot the tlO slud,e 'Ilpies
recei,ed 8/4/83 for
bezafaleot cbroli..
83/12/13 Correspoodeoci rl.fbe Grlfes,RIA LaboratorT Beuaei,huui Sllplillg/Dau
results,rll diU lid Anoe.
SUlllrT ot tbe letll
aoalysls aid GC Icreeal
0 t nip I tS
83/12/28 StatuI ot IRR Risk IfRi Beraoet ASlociatel SIIPl1119/Dau
Alselslent,Cr1tlcal
Dati OD Slud,e 1.'loe,
Salple Deser1ption
Intorlltlol, ud
AnalTticl1 Results
83/12/2' Drltt: Stitul ot IRR VlR,Inc. Berllei Allociates SIIpl1119/Data
Ruk AuuSlut
-------
Page Mo. 4
11/.8/91
ADYIMISTRATIYI RICORD SAMPLIMG/DATA IRDII
IAfRI WASTI OIL SITI
DocrMERTS MOT COPIED. MAY 81 REVIIIED AT faz
nS£PA RIGI01 V OffICES, CHICAGO, ILLIIOI5.
DATI TITLI AUTHOR RlCIPIUf DOCUIIIT T!PI
84/.1/15 Stltus of IRR Rilk BeraD!t. ASlociates Silplillq 1 Dati
Assunut
84/.5/31 Letter re: Salpliag Betlaet, Beraak Assoclates Oppy ,lSIB SliP l1llq 1 Data
Protocols for tbe
IRR rilk alleSSleat
84/17/.8 Report br Dr. Gasva Berallet,8eraaek ASsoclltes Oppy, 151B Slipliaq/Data
of 7/2/84 recordillq
bil judilellt about
tbe possible hydrologic
ilpact of City lell '8
011 the lIaturll flo.
of qrollDdnter
85/82117 Letter re: Data DuSold,BeraDek Associatel Ibeat,ISBB Snplillq/Data
requested reqlrdlllg
the static nter
le'el leasurelellts
at the VRR 'ltb laps,
qrapbs, alld cbarts
attacbed
85;82/28 Proposal to baTe the L. 8roekuD,IRR,lIIc. Pickard, 11MB Sliplill9/Dlta
loaltor vella tested
ODee a rear hy Idqlo
Laboratories ill lort
Iafu,II
85/.8/2. Chelical IlaliDltioD IS8I C01UIbii Citf later Salplilq/Dlta
of lIur Dept
85/.9/31 Attacblellt 1. '.chl1eal SII,lillq/Dlta
KelorlDdul lort '1'1
De,elopleDt Pbale
layu lute Oil
Colulbia City, II,
vitb lap. IDd tablls
85/11/25 5alpll IDd IIIa11te 3 :illic~. aSIPA Teatel.lIT SlIp!1l1q/Dau
..11. tblt str,e lbe
IUQlcipali tT of
Colalhia City
.111/19 Mno re: Request for CODstaDtelos,USIPA Saaders,USlPl SlIpl1l1q/Data
MUlliclpal DrilltiDq later
Supply It Colulbla Cltf,
-------
Paqe 10.
11/18/91
ADr.IKIsrRATlil RICORD SA"PLIIG/DATA IIDII
fAYl1 IASTI OIL SIrl
DOCfKIRTS lOT COPIID. IAT BI RIVIIIED AT TII
USEPA RIGIOI V OffICIS. CIICAGO, ILLIIOIS.
DATI rInK AunOR RlCIPIIIT DOCDIUT TUE
II '.)
85/12/27 Salples ot DiollD :iciqraf.Board of Voris Kaoaqer Caplice,DSIPA Sliplioq/Data
ADal'Sls traoslltted
frol Zlciqrat ot
Colulbla Car,II
to Caplice of USIPA
86/11/17 Salple Description aad USIPA Sliplillq/Data
SAS DI0llil Salples
86/.3/27 Geopbysical sarvey Bartlett, USIP! file Salplillq/Data
cOllducted ill order
to delllieate .u.pected
areas of burled letall
druls OD slte 11tb lap
attacbed
86/15/12 Salplloq perforled for "yers.Roy ,. lutOD,hc. lu, USIPA SlIpUDq/Data ~
~
eValuatl0a of poteDt~al
releases of suspected
ba%ardous laterlals to
the ell'iroalellt aad/or
populatioa alld tbe
salpllaq activlties
cODducted, Iltb laps
alld tlbles attacbed
86/'5/1' Diolll1,/rurllis Surroqate AaericaD ADalytlcll , TecbDicll Ser rlr SalpUllq/Dlta
Reconry
86/15/28 DiollD rest Rel,lt. . 1"Ilard-Clyde CODJultiDtJ tiP lie! SII,liDq/Dati
IIIclDeratar lru
86/16/11 lelo reI IIYI. 'lite Oil !but, IDn Buck.IDU Sliplillq/Data
lori Plall aDd IIllytical
results frol the te.tlllq
ruuled utall
86/.6/2. Gelleral IlIorqallic iersn , USIPA fAT Sliplillq/Dlta
Cbellstry Sectioll
Dlta Report IDd
IDorqa~ic Allalyses
Data Pactaqe
86/'7/26 Cbelical 1IIIlilatIoil of ISBB Colalbia City later Salp11Dq/DIta
later Dept
86/'7/2' Laboratory Data of OB! La~oratorles Salplillq/Dlta
-------
Page Jo.
81188/98
AD"lRISTRATIVI RICORD SAMPLIJG/DATA 11011
IATII IASTI OIL SITI '.
DocrRIRTS lOT COPIlb, RAT 81 RIYIIIID AT TII
aSEPA RIGIOI , OllIces, CIIC1GO, ILLIIOIS.
DATI TITLI AUTIOR nCHIIIT DOCUlIiT TYn
ADalY'l' COlpatabilltles
86/.7/29 Cbelical 1IIIiDItioa of ISBR COl.lbil City liter Sa.,liI9/Data
hUr Dept
86/'8/85 Reque,t for ADalYles of COlltantelol,aSIPl SIDden, OSIU SII,liD9/Dati
,
MUDicipal DrlDkia9 later
Supply at Colulbia City,
II
86/.8/18 Sallary Report of aSIPA SlI,lia9/Dati
ADalytical Ser,icel
86/.9/" layae II.te Oil USIU Sal' liD91 Dati
Drlakil9 later Alalrsll
Resal ts SUllary
86/89/15 Partial Priority I Salder',aSIP1,Director of ISO lIT Sliplil9/Data
Data
-'/89119 Precl.ioD aDd lccuracr Parker. OSIU OSlPl SUpliDq/Dlta
of ADlly,el for Dati
Set Site 513484
86/.9/19 lilal Data for Priority I SIDders,aSIP1,Director of ISO IItter,OSln SII,liD9/Data
86/.9119 PrecilioD lId lccDracr 05l'l-le9ioa V,CRL SII,liD9/Data
Stateleat,lPI tor tbe
TelllMetal., aad OC
SUIliry Stlteleat for
lIyoe lute Oil
86/.9/38 Letter rer flf cOI.lcte. lyerl,Roy l. lestoD,Iac. Clplice, ISIU SII,liD9/Data
a laipliD9 profrll of
tbe abo,e-9roll. Itorlge
talk, at 11R, litk a
lap aDd table. Ittacbed
81112/26 Let:er re: Correctiol 5klIDer,Pbili,s IDdultries,IDc. BUIID,gSlU SII,liD9/Data
of the ,olaletr1c
cODtributioD. ot "It'
87/16/27 IlorglDic ADalysi. Data Rocky KouDtall lD,lytlcal USIP! SI.,l1D9/Dlta
Paclage
87/'7/13 ADalytical Resultl for SII,liDg/Diu
laYDe Reclilitiol ,
Recyclil9,IIdiaaa
-------
Pafe Ro.
'11t8/98
AD"IIISTRATI71 RICaRD SAKPLIIG/DAfA 11Dll.
IArl1 IASTI OIL SITI
DocrRllfS lOT COPIED. KAr 81 RIVIIIID Af fll
DsrPA IIGIOI v OffICIS, CHICAGO, ILLIIOIS.
DAn fIfL! ADnOR RlCIPIIIf DOCUIllf fTn
87/'7/15 Kelo re: Interil report COlptOD,USIPA,IRT LODfO,nSIP1,RefioD SlI,lhf/Dltl
-------
APPENDIX C
STATE OF INDIANA LE'l"I'£R OF CONCURRENCE
WAYNE RECLAMATION AND RECYCLING
COLUMBIA CITY, INDIANA
-------
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
~~~~ij%1~~
tl :. R ~ 0 : 3 9J .
-
105 South MerIdIan Street
P.o. Box \:101;
IndianaJ)olis 462()(:)'(:)015
TeleJ)hone 317/232.8bC3
Mr. Valdaa V. Adaakua
Regioaa1 Ada1D1atrator
U.S. !DviroD88Dta1 Protection Al8DCY
230 S. Daarbo1'11 Street .
Ch1c&lo, IL 60604
REMEDIAL &
ENFORCEMENT
RESPONSE BRANCH
March 26, 1990
Ra:
Record of Dec1a1on
Wayaa Raclaaationand Racycl1n8 Site
Coluabia City, Indi&D8
Dear Hr. Ada8kua:
The Ind18D8 Department of !Dv1roaaental Manageaent (IDPJO baa reviewed
the u.s. !Dv1roaaenta1 Protection Aleucy'. draft Record of Deci.ion. The
IDEM i8 in full concurrence with the selected reaedial alternative presented
in the docUllent.
The ujor cOIq)oDenta of the .elected reaedy 1Dclude:
In.tall an uPlraded security feDee around the aite.
Conatruct1on. operation and ..1DtenaDee of a Soil Vapor Extraction
(SVE) ayate. in the VOC-cont..1nated ao11 area..
DeliDeate aad r...d1ate lead-contaainated .011. via .011 .aabina or
1-.h1l1zatioa/.tabtl1&ation t8ChDolope..
Coutr\l(;t1.. ope1:at1on &Ad u1Atel18Dee of a 8round vaLer
_eztractioD aDd treataeAt/d1acbarSe .y.ta..
...,... aDd treat conteta of all above- and below ground tanka;
dei.1D8ate the atent of cont_ination due to .pUl. or le.ka
a.meiated wi th the taw.
lle80ft aad ci1.'P0" of a1 te debria, 1Dclud1D& but DOt 11a1 ted to all
tmka (abov~. below-aroUDd ed parc1al1y buried), tanker trucks,
aad the 1DC1Mrator.
Del1D8&te tile atat of the 8U1i1c1pal ledfi1l.
Cover PAH-coataa1Dated 8011 or cODaol1date UDder 8UA1c1pal landfill
cap.
An Equal Opportunity Employer
-------
Mr. Vald.a~ v. .,...IN.
pal8' 'I'Wo
CoaatructioD aDd mainteDance of a RCRA Subtitle D Coapliant cap
over the municipal landfill.
MoDitorina of ground vater aDd air.
Deed re8trictions to ensure protection of the 8uncipal landfill cap.
Our Itaff haa been working clo.ely with leaion V staff in the .election
of an appropriate remedy and i8 .atisfied that the aelected alternative
adequately addre.... the public health, welfare aDd the env1ronaent with
relard to the Wayne leclaaation aDd lacycliaa site.
Plea.. be a08urad that IDEH 1. c0881tteci to accOI8pli8h1na cleanup of all
Iad1ana sttee on the Natioaal Prioritie8 Lilt aDd intends to fulfill all
oblia8t1oaa required by law to achie.,. that loal.
Sincerely,
if5.e(l~
C0I81s81oner
cc:
Tina Hyde, U. S. !PA, Relion V (SHS-ll)
------- |