Untied States
Environmental Protecbon
Agency
Office 01
Emergency and
Remedial Response
EPAIROD/R08.881018
October 1987
Superfund
Record of Decision:
Y:6S1-/3563b
Anaconda Smelter/Mill Creek, MT
-------
50272 -10
REPORT DOCUMENTATION Ii. REPORT NO.
PAGE EPA/ROD/R08-88/018
4. T,tle .nd Subtitle
.
12.
3. Reclplent's Accesllon No
SUPERFUND RECORD OF DECISION
Anaconda Smelter/Mill Creek, MT
st Remedial Action
thor(s)
5. Report Dete
10/02/88
6.
8. Perform In. O,..nlz.tlon Rept No
-
9. Performln. 0,.8nlz8tlon N8me 8nd Address
10 Project/Task/Work Unit No
-
--- --
---
11. Contr8cteC) or G'8nt(G) No
eCI
(G)
-
-- ------
12. Sponsorrn. Or.8nlzatlon N.me and Address
U.S. EnVlrOnmental Protectlon
401 M street, S.W.
Nashington, D.C. 20460
13. Type of Report & Perrod Covered
Agency
800/000
14.
15. Supplement.ry Notes
I" All8trKt (Umlt: 200 words)
The 160-acre community of Mlll Creek is located in Deerlodge County, Montana,
immedlately adjacent to the Anaconda Smelter ~PL site. The community of Mill Creek has
been contaminated for over lOa years wlth smelter emissions, fugitive emisslons of flu
dust at the smelter, and contlnued fugitive emissions emanating from adJacent highly
contamlnated sOlls. Settled flue emisslons in the community of Mill Creek, from the now
'Iunct copper smelting operatlon, contaln arsenlC, cadmium, and lead. Environmental
~ing of the community and blological testing of pre-school children, led EPA to
conclude that contaminatlon in the Mill Creek area poses an lmminent and substantial
endangerment to the health of lndlviduals residlng there. In comblnation wlth future
operable unlts for Mill Creek, the goal of this lnterim remediation lS to provide
adequate permanent protectlon for the health of current resldents and interim protection
for future short-term vlsitors to the area. The primary contaminant of concern at this
site is arsenlC. Cadmium and lead are secondary contaminants of concern.
The selected remedlal action for this slte includes: permanent relocation of all
residents (8 homes) with temporary erosional stabllization of dlsturbed areas by
establishing and malntainlng a vegetatlve cover: demolltion, consolidatlon, and
(See Attached Sheet)
17. Document An.lysls a. Dncrtptors
Record of Decision
Anaconda Smelter/Mlll Creek, MT
First Remedlal Action
Contaminated Media: debrls, soil
K~ 1&.Ii\OIiti~TerriW!tals (arsenic)
c. COSATI Field/Group
~\ .1I81:tillty St.tement
19. Security Class (This Report)
Nnnl3
21. No of Pa.es
126
--
20. Securrty Cless (This Pa.e)
N"""'13
22. Prrce
S.. ANSI-Z39 18)
See Instructions on Reve,.e
OPTIONAL FORM 272 (4-77)
(Fo,me,ly NTIS-35)
Department of Comme,ce
-------
EPA/ROD/R08-88/0l8
A~aconda Smelter/Mill Creek, MT
First Remedial Action
16.
ABSTRACT (contlnued)
temporary onslte storage of debris; fenclng and postlng of the entlre site; and
lmplementation of site access and deed restrlctions. The estimated p~esent worth cost
for this remedlal action is $300,000.
-------
RECORD OF DECISION
MILL CREEK, MONTANA
ANACONDA SMELTER
SUPERFUND SITE
FIRST OPERABLE UNIT
OCTOBER 1987
Prepared by:
U.S. EP A
Region VIII
Montana Office
...
EPAO
-------
RECORD OF DECISION FIRST AMENDMENT
Site Name and Location
Anaconda Sme~ter Site, First Operable Unit, Mill Creek,
Montana
Description of Amendment
A health-based performance goal for drinking water at the
tap in Mill Creek was erroneously included on page 48 in the
October 2, 1987, Mill Creek, Montana, Record of Decision (ROD).
This performance goal is not relevant for the sele=ted remedy, as
indicated on page IV.B. of Appendix D of the Mill Creek
Feasibility Study.
Incorrect background levels of arsenic and cadmium in air of
0.23 ng/m3 and 0.6 ng/m3, respectively, were also identified for
health-based performance goals on page 48 of the ROD. The correct
numbers for background levels of arsenic and cadmium in air are
0.01 ug/m3 for each element, as noted on page A-10 of Appendix D
of the Mill Creek Feasibility Study.
A typographical error was made at the top of page 47 of the
Mill Creek ROD. The second "bullet" point on the page should have
been included in parentheses as part of the first.
On page 47 a typographical error was also made concerning
the Federal Water Quality Criteria for copper. The incorrect
value of 0.0055 mg/l for aquatic life is corrected to be 0.0065
mg/l.
The attached amended pages 47 and 48 are hereby substituted
for the original pages in the October 2, 1987, ROD, in order to,
correct these errors.
In addition two additional documents are being added to the
administrative record inventory because they were considered in
development of the Mill Creek Endangerment Assessment. These
documents are:
1 .
December 17, 1985 letter from Dr. Stephen Margolis,
Acting Director, Office of Health Assessment, ATSDR, to
Mr. Robert L. Duprey, Director Waste Management
Division, Region VIII (Administrative Record File No.
2021708,100002 c and d).
.
2.
Endangerment Assessment Mill Creek, Montana, Anaconda
Smelter Site, Final Report, for Internal Review
(Administrative Record File No. 2021708,100002b).
-------
The Responsiveness Summary is also amended to address an
'additional issue as set forth below:
Comment Marqolis (paqe 2, paraqraph 6): "The Endanqerment
Assessment uses the unit risk derived from the Ott study of lunq
cancer as a 'reasonable upper limit' for estimatinq risk. These
data have been rejected by EPA as unreliable for use in lifetime
risk assessment (because of small numbers of deaths, most of them
occurrinq in people with less than 1 year exposure) and should not
be used in that way."
Response: The current endanqerment assessment, as did the
previous version, specifically points out that the Ott study data
were eliminated prior to calculatinq the inhalation unit risk for
arsenic~
Jf
?
,. If' p.
,
Attachments
-------
EXHIBrr 2
RECORD OF DECISION
MILL CREEK, MONTANA
ANACONDA SMELTER
SUPERFUND SITE
FIRST OPERABLE UNIT
VOLUME I
OCTOBER 1987
EPA ,s,
-------
RECORD OF DECISION
SITE NAME AND LOCATION
Anaconda Smelter Slte, Flrst Operable Unit - Hill Creek, Hontana
STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
The purpose of this record of declsion (ROD) is to select a remedial action
for the community of Hill Creek, Hontana. Hill Creek, Hontana is an
operable unit of the Anaconda Smelter National Priorities List (NPL) site.
The Anaconda Smelter Site was placed on the NPL in September 1983. Hill
Creek is located in southern Deerlodge County, southwestern Hontana,
approximately 2S miles west-northwest of Butte, Hontana, 1.5 miles east of
Anaconda, Montana and is immedlately adjacent to the Anaconda Smelter.
Environmental and biologlc'testlng show that the community of Mill Creek,
Montana is the most contaminated Inhablted area around the Anaconda Smelter
NPL site. Mill Creek resldents are constantly exposed to several media
contaminated by arsenic, cadmlum, and lead. Consequently, human health
concerns in Hill Creek are EPA's highest priority for the Anaconda Smelter
site. EPA has concluded that the contamlnation 1n the Hill Creek area
poses an imminent and substantial endangerment to the health of individuals
residing there. Exposure of chlldren to ingestlble forms of arsenic dust
and cadmium, soil, and water in the Hill Creek community would ~ikely
result in elevated cancer rlsks. Exposure to cadm1um and lead n ~oil and
dust also can lead to adverse toxic affects on human health. The prlmary
purpose of the selected remedy for Hill Creek is to provide adequate
permanent protection for the health of current res1dents in Hill Creek,
Montana and interim protection of future short-term visitors in the area.
This record of decislon document describes the selected first operable
unit, interim remedial action for this site of permanent relocatlon wlth
temporary site stabil1zation. This remedy was developed in accordance wlth
the Comprehensive Env1ronmental Response, Compensat1un, and Llabllity Act
(CERCLA), as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorizat10n Act of
-1-
-------
1986 (SARA), and the National Contingency Plan. The State of Hontana and
the Federal Emergency Hanagement Agency (FEHAj have concurred on the
selected remedy of permanent relocation of Hl1l Creek resldents vlth
temporary site stabilization.
STATEHENT OF BASIS
This decision is based upon the admlnistrative record vhich has been
compiled for the Hill Creek Operable Unit, including the follovlng
documents:
o
Final Remedial Investigation Report, Hill Creek Operable Unit,
Anaconda Smelter Slte, September 1987- Prepared by the Atlantic
Richfield Company for U.S. EPA, Region 8.
o
Final Feasibility Study Report, Hill Creek Operable Unit, Anaconda
Smelter Site,~September 1987. Prepared by the Atlantic Richfield
Company for U.S. EPA, Regl0n 8.
o
Final Revised Endangerment Assessment: Hill Creek, Hontana
(Anaconda Smelter Site) September 1987. Prepared by Clement
Associates, Inc. for U.S. EPA, Region 8.
a
Summary of Remedial Alternatives Selection (attached hereto).
o
Responsiveness Summary (attached hereto).
o
Other reports, documents, correspondence, etc. included in the
Administratlve Record (see attached index).
DESCRIPTION OF SELECTED REHEDY
The remedy for Hill Creek, Hontana selected by EPA is the interim first
operable unit remedy of permanent relocation of all Hill Creek residents.
Follow!nl relocation of all residents, the area vill be temporarily
stabilized. The contaminated soils in Hill Creek vill be addressed as part
of the r888dy for the Anaconda Smelter NPL site. The contaminated debrlS
from the relocation or demolition actlvlties viII be consolldated and
temporarily stored vith simllar debrls on Smelter Hill. Final disposltlon
of these materials vill be addressed as part of the final remedy for the
Anaconda Smelter NPL site. Areas dlsturbed by the relocation/demolltion
-2-
-------
activities vill be regraded and revegetated. Operation and maintenance
requirements for the selected alternative will include monitoring and
maintenance of the vegetative cover used to stabilize disturbed areas and
installation and maintenance of a fence around the perimeter of the site.
Short term institutional controls to control access and land use vill also
be implemented.
The selected interim remedy provides adequate protection of the health of
current residents of Hill Creek. This alternative is the most cost
effective alternative considered and vould result in the lovest estimate of
excess risk to public health. This remedy is also environmentally
preferable to all other remedies and is necessary because of the potential
for recontamination of the Hill Creek area from wind blovn dust from
surrounding areas contaminated with arsenic, cadmium, and lead. A
"cleanup" remedy at this time would therefore not be reliable over the long
term. The selected remedy complies with all applicable or relevant and
appropriate Federal and State requirements addressing the interim remedy of
permanent relocation and temporary site stabilization. CERCLA
sub-paragraph 121(d)(4)(a) allows the selection of a remedy that does not
attain a level or standard of control at least equivalent to all legally
applicable or relevant and appropriate Federal and State standards,
requirements, criteria, or limitations if the remedial action selected is
only part of a total remedial action that vill attain such level or
standard of control vhen completed. The Record of Decisions for subsequent
operable unit(s) addressing Hill Creek vill select applicable or relevant
and appropriate requirements associated with permanent remedies. The
evaluation and identification of such requirements in Remedial
Investigation/Feasibility Studies do not represent final EPA
determinations.
In accordance with Section 121(b) of CERCLA, alternative permanent
solutions and alternative treatment technologies vere evaluated (deep
tilling, s01l leaching, etc.). Review indicated that these treatmenf
technologies did not adequately reduce surface contaminant levels belo~
-3-
-------
public health concerns. Hoyever, further testing is needed to evaluate
other technologies~ Innovative technologies and permanent remedies yill be
fully evaluated in RI/FS vork for the final remedy at the Anaconda Smelter
NPL site.
The Anaconda Smelter Superfund site consists of the Anaconda Old Vorks and
Anaconda (Vashoe) Smelter sites, the Arbiter Plant, numerous vaste piles
and vaste ponds, various demolition dumps, and associated areas
contaminated by aerial deposition of smelter stack emissions. The total
Superfund site area covers se~eral tens of square miles. Several operable
units have been designated (40 CFR Sub-section 300.68(c» based on
similarities in the nature of the contamination, the location of the
contaminated media and the ability of areas to be remediated under similar
.
time frames. The Mill Creek Operable Unit is the first operable unit at
the Anaconda Smelter site vhich has received focused attention over the
past year oving to the highest documented level of environmental
contamination of all communities in the area, the demonstrated exposure of
Mill Creek children to smelter contaminants, and the associated risks to
humaq health.
As previously stated, the purpose of the Mill Creek interim remedy is to
provide adequate permanent protection for the health of current residents
in Mill Creek, Hontana and interim protection of the health of future
short-term visitors in the area. Some environmental concerns vill be
addressed vithin the limits of the selected remedy. For example, fugitlve
dust vill be minimized during house demolition and site revegetation
efforts. Bovever, regional contamination problems vhich may remain in Hill
Creek after implementation of the interim remedy vill be addressed under
separate operable units. The final remedy for soils and ground Yater yill
be determined folloving the RI/FS reports for these remaining operable
units.
As required by Section 121(d)(2) of CERCLA and 40 CFR Section 300.68. thE
final remedy vill attain or exceed applicable or relevant and approprlate
-4-
-------
Federal and State public health and environmental standards and will
effectively 81n1mize the release of hazardous substances into the
environment so they do not migrate to cause substantial danger to present
or future public health and the environment (40 CFR 300.68(a)(1).
DECLARATIONS
Consistent vith the Comprehensive Environmental lesponse, Compensation, and
Liability Act of 1980 (CEICLA) as amended by the Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA) and the National Contingency Plan for
oil and hazardous substances (40 CFR Part 300), I have determined that the
selected first operable unit interim remedy at the Anaconda Smelter site,
Mill Creek, Montana operable unit:
o
Provides adequate permanent protection for the health of current
Mill Creek residents and adequate interim protection for the health
of short-term visitors to the area.
o
Complies with all applicable or relevant and appropriate State and
Federal requirements pertaining to the interim remedy of permanent
relocation and temporary site stabilization.
o
For the purpose of the interim first operable unit for Mill Creek,
the II/FS adequately evaluated permanent treatment and alternative
treatment technologies for the purposes of SARA. The statutory
preference for treatment that reduces toxicity, mobility, or volume
vill also be fully addressed in RI/FS work for later operable
units.
o
Is consistent vith CERCLA requirements governing remedial action
(sub-paragraph 121(d)(4)(a), provided the remedial action selected
is part of a total remedial plan that will achieve a set level or
standard of control when completed;
o
Is cost effective; and
o
ViII be consistent with the final remedy for the Anaconda Smelter
site.
This remedy is more cost effective than and environmentally preferable to
the transportation, storage, treatment, destruction, or secure disposltl0n
off-site of the hazardous substances (Section 101(24) of CERCLA). The
-5-
-------
State of Montana h~s been consulted and concurs with the approved remedy.
In addition, the action will require minimal future operation and
maintenance activities to ensure the continued effectiveness of the remedy.
These activities vill be considered part of the approved action. EPA has
not reached agreement with the responsible party at the site to implement
the selected remedy; however, the responsible party has reached an
.cree..nt with several residents to purchase their property and continues
to negotiate with the 8 remaining families in the community. See attached
confidential enforcement analysis.
- ~- ~/.
James. ereI'
Regio Administrator
EPA Region VIII
dZt-.-
.2. ",')
Date
Attachments
-6-
-------
SUMMARY OF REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVE SELECTION
This part of the Record of Decision (ROD), summarizes the information EPA
used and the evaluations conducted to support the selection of the interim
remedy for Mill Cree~, Montana. In addition to the summary text,
Attachments I, II, III, and IV provide EPA's: Responsiveness Summary,
Statement of Findings for Floodplains and Vetlands, Confidential
Enforcement Analysis, and Administrative Record Index, respectively. This
information collectively is EPA's record of decision supporting the
selection of permanent relocation vith temporary site stabilization as the
interim remedy for Mill Creek, Montana.
I.
SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
The unincorporated community of Mill Creek is located in southwestern
Montana at the southern end of Deer Lodge Valley approximately 25 miles
vest-northvest of Butte, Montana and about 1.5 miles east of Anaconda,
Hon~ana (Figure 1). The study area is located immediately adjacent to the
Anaconda Smelter.
Hill Creek (also known as Silica), Montana is located immediately adjacent
to the Anaconda Smelter site. The community covers an area of 160 acres,
70 of which are owned by the Anaconda Hinerals Company (AHC). Host of the
surrounding lands are owned by AHC (Figure 2).
The principal ground water bearing structure in the immediate vicinity of
the sit. is a shallow alluvial aquifer consisting of characteristically
coarse crained fan and floodplain deposits that are moderatly permeable and
hydraulically connected vith surface streams. The study area is in the
Hill Creek drainage, a tributary of Silver Bow Creek, which flows dIrectly
through the Varm Springs tailing pond complex.
-7-
-------
Montana
. MILL CREEK
TO DUA I.OOC!
'TO
u::IST'
CMIK
WARM ~ ~
".I..a.~
.",
,
.",
-
:R
:f
~
~
!
..
I
.. ~
J '
I ,.
C.
\
\
..
~
\
't)~ \
I~
~
-'
.
-.
- _ft.
. ,
Figure
I .
Location of Mill Creek and surrounding communities.
-------
II.
SITE HISTORY AND CURRENT SITE STATUS
A.
Site Sistory
Residents moved into the Hill Creek area due to its close proximity to the
Anaconda Smelter site. The first filine on record for land in the Hill
Creek area vas in 1902. By 1916-1917, a laree part of the Hill Creek area
contained tents, loe houses, and shacks. By 1918, a schoolhouse vas moved
to the Hill Creek community. Eventually, the community vas divided into
the Hillviev lots, as shovn in Fieure 2.
The Anaconda Smelter vas operated for nearly a century beeinnine in 1884
and ceasine in 1980. The smelter vas initially operated by the Anaconda
Copper Company (later renamed the Anaconda Company), and its predecessors
in interest. The Anaconda Company merged vith the Atlantic Richfield
Corporation (ARCO) in 1977. ARCO operated the smelter from 1977 to 1980
and continues to ovn the former smelter site and surrounding areas near
Mill Creek throueh its Anaconda Hinerals Company operating unit.
Ore and concentrates vere processed in the Old Vorks, Arbiter, and Vashoe
Yorks .at various times betveen 1884 and 1980. Ore processing to anode
copper produced vastes that have spread over more than 6,000 acres and
contain elevated concentrations of arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead, and
zinc. ARCO has estimated that the vastes include about 185 million cu.
yds. of tailings, 27 million cu. yds. of granulated slag, and 0.25 million
cu. yd. of flue dust. Locations of vaste piles of these materials in
relation to the community of Hill Creek are shown on Figure 3.
The Anaconda Smelter site vas listed on the National Priorities List (NPL)
on September 8, 1983 (48 Federal Register 40658). Contamination of the
community of Mill Creek vas identified as a problem during the Phase I
remedial investieation. The community has been contaminated from over 10f
years of smelter emissions, fugitive emissions of flue dust located ~t th~
smelter, and continued fugltive emissions from adjacent highly contamlna'ed
-9-
-------
O ANACONOA MINERALS
COMPANY QWNEASHIP
o PRIVATE OWNERSHIP
"
.,
, "'.
.
.
I
t
.
'"
I
.
I
,
I
.
,
\
"-
~
.
,
, ,
, I
"
I ,
\:~
, I
,
..
I,
.
.
,
I
I
,/
,
,
.
I'
- '
- '
. "
I
I
/
"
,
I
.-
,/
.. ,
, .
I
.
=
I
, ,
I .
,
/.
I.
I
,
I
:1 .
~I "
... , ~
C,V
I
o ,.-' 0 ,at
, , .:: f:f\i.J
.
/ ' 1:/-'
I"'" -" /'
-----
.. ., - - -
, -.
- -
- - ""'- - -.. -- -..
--
".
- -".'
- -
. ,
,
~
-
-
---------------
. .. .. -
. - ..
,
,
,
,
-
-
Fi gure 2.
Subdivision of lots in the community of Mill
Creek, MT.
-------
t OLD WORKS I
IER WORKS LOWER WORKS I'
II 5 ~ 3~, \' BLACK SLAG S~~ ~K,: - ,...-
iif.: ". . ... . ." .cs'~ ""-~-
~.iiI[.,~.. =! ~ r ~ ~E.~tr ~tf}-..J
.. --..... ... ~~.
. ~SLAG DUMP ". ""'It .........'\ . J
, -"-. "" 'U '- '..::'r-\
_0' ...... II u~
RED SANDS' -1\1. C1
= . ARBITER
'NDA
,
,
....~
I(I~I'TV'
,
.r -
J
r
,
,
./
I
Fi gure 3.
Location of Anaconda Smelter facilities in relation
to ,..i11 Creek.
~
-------
soils. Durlng soil sampling of communities in the vicinity of the smelter,
in accordan~e vith CERCLA Section 106 Admin1strative Order on Consent
(CERCLA-VIII-84-06), 1t vas d1scovered that Mill Creek had extremely high
levels of arsenic and other heavy metal contaminants vhen compared to other
communities in the area.
The Center for Disease Control (CDC) shaved that pre-school children from
the community of Hill Creek had greater arsenic exposure than children of
another community in the Anaconda area. This conclusion vas made after CDC
conducted urine sampling in March 1985. Sampling vas continued in July of
1985. This urine survey shoved that a CDC attempt to reduce exposure to
house dust in Hill Creek did not reduce the children's urinary arsenic
levels, and the levels 1n the Hill Creek chlldren remained hlgher than
those of children in any other community studied. These elevated urinary
arsenic levels perslsted 1n spite of house cleaning efforts designed by the
CDC and recommendations by both CDC and EPA to residents on hov to reduce
exposure of children to contaminated materials.
Hean urinary arsenic levels 1n Hill Creek decreased after several residents
vere relocated. No persons tested after the move had urinary arsenic
levels above 50 ug/l, a concentration vhich CDC considered to be a "level
of concern". The fact that ch1ldren's urinary arsenic levels before the
move vere so much greater than the levels for adults is consistent vlth the
hypothesis that children can serve as a sentinel population in certaln
circumstances.
A detailed, quantitative endangerment assessment vas prepared by Clement
and Associates, Inc. for Hill Creek, Hontana (in April 1986). This
assessment evaluated the actual and potential exposures of the residents in
Hill Creek to hazardous substances through soil, air, drinking vater, and
household dust pathvays. The results of this study and the CDC study led
EPA to sign an Action Hemorandum on April 29, 1986, requesting funding to
temporarily relocate high r1sk residents of H1ll Creek and remove them from
the threat of harmful exposure posed by the Anaconda Smelter slte.
-12-
-------
Residents of fourteen households have been temporarily relocated under this
action. A urinary arsenic survey vas conducted after residents vere
relocated in the Fall of 1986. Hean urinary arsenic levels in Hill Creek
decreased after residents were relocated. Although 5 individuals had
urinary arsenic levels above 50 ugll (considered to be a "level of
concern") prior to the move, none had urinary arsenic levels above 50 ug/l
after relocation from Hill Creek. The CDC stated that strictly speaking,
one cannot infer from the data that excess arsenic exposure has ceased,
except for around the time of testing. Nevertheless, CDC believes that
their sampling was representative of exposures generally occurring in our
study population and that the relocation has effectively decreased
exposure. The quantitative endangerment assessment was revised in October
of 1987 and continues to indicate significant risks.
In July 1986, AHC agreed to implement an expedited RIIFS focusing on the
human health issues only. Subsequent operable units (regional soils and
regional ground vater) viiI completely address other issues and other areas
of t~e Anaconda Smelter site. This expedited RIIFS was conducted under a
CERCLA S106 Administrative Order on Consent (Docket No. CERCLA VIII-86-07).
During the conduct of the RIIFS, ARCO negotiated vith the Hill Creek
residents to permanently relocate them from the tovn. ARCO has
successfully reached agreement vith all but eight of the families and
continues to negotiate vith those remaining.
B. Quantity, Type, and Concentration of Hazardous Substances Present
The principal waste sources that have contributed to contamination in Hlll
Creek are the result of Anaconda Smelter operations that have occurred for
nearly 100 years. These sources include historic stack and fugitive
emissions and ongoing fugitive emissions from contaminated areas
surrounding the Anaconda Smelter. Information on arsenic and heavy metals
concentrations (ug/g) of the various vaste sources is I1sted bel~".
-13-
-------
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
.........
Flue dust
Slag
Opportunity Tailings
49,900-69,600
498-3,190
36-535
1,130-1,300
4.4-44
1.5-46.5
9,790-14,600
364-4,310
(10-2,290
Analysis of soil, dust, air, and vater samples collected to date at the
Mill Creek site shov extensive contamination by Anaconda Smelter vastes.
Of primary concern are elevated concentrations of arsenic and heavy metals
in soils, drinking vater, and household dust, vith corresponding elevated
urinary arsenic levels of children (tvo to six years old) in Mill Creek.
C. KNOVN OR SUSPECTED RISKS
The community of Mill Creek vas originally comprised of approximately 36
households and had a permanent population of less than 100 people. As a
result of temporary relocation efforts by EPA and ARCO's buyout program,
only 8 residences"are currently occupied. The risk estimates summarized
belov are based in part on the assumption that children betveen the ages of
one to six years old are living in Mill Creek, Montana. This vas the case
until the summer of 1987 vhen ARCO voluntarily permanently relocated the
families vith children of that age. EPA has continued to use the
assumption of the presence of children because of the potential that
additional children could move into Mill Creek or be born in Mill Creek.
EPA has identified significant public health risks for children and adults
posed by exposure to arsenic and heavy metals in soil, drinking vater, air,
and households in the community of Mill Creek. The toxicological
properties of arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead, and zinc are fully discussed
in the Mill Creek endangerment assessment.
Arsenic is a knovn carcinogen that has been associated with an increased
frequency of skin cancer vhen ingested, and lung cancer vhen inhaled.
Cadmium has been associated with an increased frequency of ll1n~ canc~r in
-14-
-------
humans when inhaled. Arsenic and cadmium can be acutely or chronically
toxic, and can be fatal if ingested or inhaled in sufficient quantities by
humans, livestock, and wildlife.
Other~azardous substances of concern at the site include lead, copper, and
zinc. Lead is a cumulative poison which can cause neurological, kidney,
and blood cell damage in humans. Some lead compounds are also animal
carcinogens adversely affecting the lungs and kidneys. At elevated levels,
80me copper and zinc compounds are toxic to a number of animal species,
including humans. Copper and zinc are particularly toxic to fish. Severe
illness andlor death can result from vxposure of humans, livestock, and
wildlife to toxic levels of ersenic, cadmium, and lead.
Currently, there are no uniform national standards identifying what
constitutes a hazardous level of arsenic In 5011. Therefore, it was
necessary to estimate the levels of carcinogenic risk posed by potential
exposure to arsenic in the community of Mill Creek, Montana.
The carcinogenic risk was calculated in accordance with EPA's current
guidelines for carcinogenic risk assessment. The cancer potency factor was
mu1tip~ied by the average lifetime exposure in mg/kg/day, to yield
estimates of lifetime excess risks of cancer resulting from exposure.
Geometric mean concentrations of arsenic, cadmium, and lead in each medium
were used in average case risk estimates, whereas maximum concentrations
for these substances in each medium were used in reasonable maximum risk
estimates. For arsenic and cadmium, daily chemical intake for soil
ingestion, drinking water, and the non-respirable fraction of the
inhalation pathway were summed in order to determine cumulative exposure
for each substance. In the case of lead, a multimedia exposure model
developed in the Mill Creek endangerment assessment was used to linearly
estimate average and reasonable maximum blood lead concentrations in
children. Finally, the cumulative risk estimates for individual substance5
.
were used to assess potential risks associated with multiple chemical
exposures. Carcinogenic r1sks for multiple chemical exposure were
-15-
-------
determined by adding cadmium and arsenic lung cancer risks. Because of the
difference in the two target organs, potential skin cancer risks associated
with arsenlc ingestion were consldered independently from lung cancer
risks.
Non-carcinogenic risks for multlple chemlcal exposure vere estimated by
calculating a cumulative hazard index for ingested cadmium, and inhaled or
ingested lead.
Using this approach, EPA evaluated the risk associated with the no action
alternative for the Hill Creek operable unit in the October, 1987 Revised
Final Endangerment Assessment for Hill Creek, Hontana. Using the average
exposure scenario, the excess risk from all exposure pathways of developing
skin cancer in Hill Creek is 1.5 x 10-4. Similarly, for the reasonable
aaximum exposure scenario the excess skin cancer risk is 2.8 x 10-3. Yith
respect to lung cancer from all exposure pathways, the excess cancer risk
for the average and reasonable maximum exposure scenarios is 1.0 x 10-4 and
1.6 x 10-3 respectively.
The cumulative hazard index for cadmium ingestion and lead exposure ranged
from 0.73 in the average case analysis to 1.96 in the reasonable maximum
case analysis. The hazard index assumes simple additivity of effects and
provides a numerical indication of the nearness to acceptable limits of
exposure or the degree to which acceptable exposure levels are exceeded
(U.S. EPA 1986a). A hazard index greater than 1.0 suggests that exposure
to an individual substance or all substances collectively exceed a
generalized level of concern for a common toxicological endpoint or targe.
organ.
EPA has concluded that the elevated arsenlC levels in the urine of the
children formerly living in Mill Creek demonstrate that they were exposed
to elevated levels of arsenic and other metals associated with the smelter.
The estimated rate of intake of arsenIc (estimates reinforced by the
arsenic levels found In their urIne) suggests that the chlldren's exposure,
-16-
-------
if continued, vould pose substantial risks of adverse health effects,
including cancer. EPA believes that any children moving into or born in
"ill Creek in the future vould be subjected to similar exposure and risks.
No quantitative biologic data have been collected vhich indicate excess
exposure of adults to smelter related contaminants. Adults may ingest
contaminated soil, but they are less likely to be exposed via this route
than are children. Exposure of adults vould occur by inhalation of
airborne contaminants in ambient and household air, and by consumption of
contaminated drinking vater. These exposure routes vould contribute to an
individual's lifetime cumulative dose and may add to substantial risks
already incurred as children.
The available data do not definitively indicate the presence of acute
exposures to arsenic that might cause other adverse health effects, such as
skin lesions or neurological impairment; but such effects could occur if
sufficient amounts of the contaminants vere ingested or inhaled.
Exposure of children in Hill Creek to lead via inhalation and ingestion
vould be sufficient to potentially increase their blood levels of lead to a
range at vhic~ they could be at risk of behavioral or neurological effects.
Although the levels of cadmium in vater and soil samples from the tovn of
"ill Creek are high enough to cause concern, this contaminant may also have
an additive or potentiating effect on other metal contaminants present in
the environment.
EPA is in the process of revising its position on the carcinogenic unit
risk factor for ingested inorganic arsenic. Under any scenario for
revision considered by EPA, significant health risks associated vith
ingestion of arsenic exist in Hill Creek. The most current published EPA
position on the degree of carcinogenicity of ingested arsenic is in the
draft "Special Report on Ingested Arsenic and Certain Human Health
Effects", EPA Risk Assessment Forum, October, 1986. This report va~ relled
on in the Hill Creek RIfFS and Endangerment Assessment as vell as thlS
-17-
-------
Record of Decision. EPA also considers the cumulative carcinogenic and
toxic risk posed by ingestion of arsenic, lead, and cadmium in soil;
drinking water; and inhaled and later swallowed particulate matter to
independently warrant remedial action. Significant risks of lung cancer
from inhalation of arsenic and cadmium also warrant action.
The contamination of the Hill Creek area poses an imminent and substantial
endangerment to the health of any children who ..y reside there (Clement
1987). Exposure of adults to ingestible foras of arsenic in dust, soil,
vater, and food in the Hill Creek community would .ost likely result in
additional elevated cancer risks. Exposure to cadmiua and lead in soil and
dust may also have adverse effects on human health and the environment.
D.
Extent of Contamination
Contamination of soils in the community of Hill Creek is widespread. A
number of investigations have been conducted to determine the spatial and
vertical distribution of arsenic and heavy metals in soils in and around
the community of Mill Creek. An inventory of soils studies for the Mill
-
Creek II/FS is provided in Table 1. Results of soil analyses for Mill
Creek and surrounding communities are summarized in Table 2. The geometric
mean concentration of arsenic, cadmium, and lead in Hill Creek surface
soils are 638 me/kg, 2S mg/kg, and 508 mg/kg. These aean values are
substantially higher than those for surrounding communities (Table 2).
The spatial distribution of contaminants in the Hill Creek area is somevhat
heterogeneous, but widespread. Figures 4, 5, and 6 illustrate the
distribution of arsenic, cadmium, and lead in surface soils in the Mill
Creek are..
Soil profile samples were also collected by AMC as part of the Hill Creek
RI/FS. Summary statistics for arsenic, cadmium, and lead in soil profile
samples are compiled in Table 3. Although the profiles vere sampled to
varying depths and a fev vere sampled in different increments, the data
-18-
-------
TABLE
1.
INVENTORY OF SOILS STUDIES FOR THE HIll CREEK STUDY AREA
... .,a
s...... ......, s..', """"181 ".""u' lA-a. 1'-" -......1 '-I.
,....,.. "'.)ft' ..,. s..ln ........ ..". ""1 h' ,........-, -...'.' ....1,..4 (-,U. 1Ir''''
a"....... .........-. k'HII'''' '-' ..., NIl: """'" I-Ill 1'.-.1( '1'..... '"'' 0 AI, U. ('. (e, ", " IF_'
(........, . 1M 1 """ s.. ,..
,.... ,... ...... .11"" 1oK... . , .. .1111 cr"" ""'; I-I (e' "..1. .,'rot ,.... W. 1 At. U. (.. ... I. ,.. 'h' 8104 ,....1.
,.n, """ . .. NIl: """"'; .....,lIul ,1." I. U_'
.....8104. l"tI I ..er ,...,...-,1 ...11 I.""
...,.,
,.,.. .... ..III I."" Ie, 118\ . . ..III (..... ,8r4' 1-' ..,......... 118. I. ,....1* 0 .'. U. .. ,., SIo8a.I. ,Iu'k u-
,... ,..I", ....1,11181
.......... Il/tI ,......1 er I..
I.'.. I.... ...... II ..... Sa"-le' I ..."1. . .. ......., 1-' ..,..,,-.. IU........ W. I .., U. C.. '-. ... In "....... ...U.
.......... ..", .'" '-11 ....1,11..1 ... I. U_'. "ull.
II." ,......1.. ... '-..
..... 8104 ...1... II( """ ..... 118\ II , ..... I'''' ,.. '-1 ..., .... 'U". ......* 10 At. I'. I.. ... I. ,.. ".1.1... "..I .-
II" "' '."1 "'.1,. '181
lIP"..... 18" ,.... ,---.., " ..III Ir'" ,", 1-' .. ,er....... .UrI. .....w. 0 At. U. (e. ... I. .. SIo8a.I. ,I.'.
II fA .11 1."1 ...... I" . "..-h'. .... ,. ,....... .'. I.. ... ,. ,.....,... ,-
I' .... Ir_'
lIP,....... .... ,.... "'11 I'" II ,"11 I.'" ,8r4 ....... 8104 1-'. 1-.. ...... ,.., ..., k, ....... n ". I.. ... ,. .. S.III -- ...,...
II" "' 1..1 ....... ...._1", .. """'" .. 1-' .... ,..1.1... .-;
..II, (FH' ,.<4 8104 .. """'" .. " I. 0 ,,111 ,- ,..I.,
..,.. .... ,..,..
.,.,....... 18" ..... "'" I'" U .11 n b... ,8r4 ...,... 8104 1-'.1-). '-..'. I". ........ I.".. ,...... 0 At. (.. ... I. .. S.'II - ,..,..
I' ". III 1...1 ...... ''''-'''' .. .....,., 1-'. . ,-, 8104 .... .... ,....,... ,-
,. " .. 11
I.". ,... ""' I.'" ..... ,... . ) ,.... .." ..., "" ,-) .. ,......... I"". ,....1.. At. I'. .. .. ".,...... '."..
"'" ,.11 " II ,.... .... ...11 I."". ) ,. ,......... ""',"181 0 "..'k '.-'.
,.... Met. . .." ., "'11 (..... "". .. II I. . .....,..1.. 0 ,....
..,1 . ....1.. 11.11 b.'"
I.'.. I... ..II' (..... ..... I'" \I I... IIn ,I." ..'I ., ""' ,-) .. ,......... ...,It .....1* ai, u. te, ", .. 51...,... '."..
11/1\ ..., " (.ft' .." .. III( """'" ) I. .......... "'.1,. '181 0 I. ,1..11. "-',
'"1 ,II.. ,. II . ',. I. ............ 0 .....
.."
I...,. I..c. 11.11 (..... "", I'" , I ..., II. .. .11<' .1 , 11111 1-) ..,....-.. 1111". ......* ". ('. .. .. 51........ '."'.
"'1\ ,... It (..... ,.... . .. ,.,...... ""',11181 0 ,",U. u_'.
...111. .. ,. I. '''er.'.'''' 0 .....
,,.,.., I' II I. ,.,...... 0
I. .1 I..
I AddUtionll Soil .rolil. date wer. unqualilied by EPA ulin9 Itatiltieal C08p8rilonl 'u.S. EPA. 1'11.-
quAlity and af. utiliZ.d in lupport 01 the coat analyaia in the ~II Cf..k rs.
'Ita... data ar. conaidefed 1._1 .
.
-------
TABLE 2. COMPARISON OF METALS CONCENTRATIONS IN SURFICIAL SOILS
AT MILL CREEK WITH OTHER NEARBY COMMUNITIESa
Number of Range Geometri c
Mean
Area Samples (mg/kg) (mg/kg)
Hi 11 Creek
As 177 25-4,080 638
Cd 146 2-145 25
Pb 177 12-2,910 508
Anaconda
As 23 28-345 114
Cd 23 1-20 6.8
Pb 23 28-1,510 229
Warm Springs
As 5 20-96 35
Cd 5 <0.4-5.9 1.8
Pb 5 12-297 61
Opportunity
As 14 16-370 106
Cd 14 1-15 4.7
Pb 14 24-5,760 141
Phi 1i psburgb
As 3 11-13 12
Cd 3 0.7-1 0.8
Pb 3 21-28 23
Townsendc
As 3 3.4-5.7 4
Cd 3 0.8-1.4 1.1
Pb 3 30-55 39
a Both qualified and unqualified data (U.S. EPA 1987).
b Control community located 30 mi north of Mill Creek.
c Control community located 110 mi northeast of Mill Creek.
-------
"
. '
,
,
'. I~'
. . . f;- ~~~ '
/1 ,\,,' , ..
"- ","" . ~'
~
'"
\
..
.
. ,
. . ~
k ."','
, ./ ' I/ . '.
. . ¥/ . .
\;:" . -' -' '.. ~ f1' . ;,\
::l' :.~ D /I L ~. ',<~
,. . '~. "',,
"0 XC-. "'~ ,'c~~~~.~ ~ .>
/~ ~ ~ . ::~l~-A~~~ ' q
.~. ~ ,,'{~-_. "S
r 0 ~ ,. .
,'. .. /,l~' ,) ':" ~~~. ~..,
.1 . ':~. . J/X ".' -:.'~ ,~,'''.-J. cREEK '.
. . ..;. ~7-.0I" X . . '
~'<"", C p/' ~~': h . - -..' . .. . .
.", . I "'X ~' -
. '. , . :" - .',' - " - . - ,; - (~
/;t' ,,' ~. h'
, ~l~;:' .<,,'i¥iJ)::)
. .,.--f " r ~,
...-..,;y "
" " ,...------
--' ------
g :,.- - --------..'
- .' --
- ,. ------
o -_.-
.- - - - -
\\
:1
. .
(mg/kg)
.
s200
X 201.1,000
o 1,001.1,500
C > 1,500
Fi gure 4 S
. urface soi 1
arsenic distrib .
ut10n.
-------
"
,
, .
,
, ,t ".' ."
" ).J.'~.;' .'
¥,.. '
II' "~" /
..1;,< ~ ...'
",,'If'11 " '.~. .
'If .,>:~,.."
«x III' .' '.~
, lID / i~ C>~.' . "~
..: . II" , fJ I ' '" '~
.' /.' , ' -. "
, I": ' ' I
C "~ i'''C~~K ;~~.,~, c:
, . \~ PAAK ..'
9 ~ .:~:: ~(J'-9
/~ . ~?f< L3',ci,:~q(~":-..;,,J/J- ,,~,/
/ /1. .~~~\I .' .
r ~\. o_,/~.,t.._-.~~:---_.,-.;~~~::
"'~ ~;r"-, v,'.:.' Q. ,.,,--.
, ~c l~//: c",''' . C ' ", ... ' ..
~ ~,/,' ,'"
l' I .
I ' ' I
.; '''' .. , ' , . .. ." - ' - . , I
. >.;1 -- Q .n-... ~ j .
~ _!/ ,~ . ~~f)~ )
.: ;11'" .,.-,,~
, -jit-" J ...' CADMIUM 30
Figure 5.
Surface s '1 '
01 cadm1um distribution.
-------
t
~
.""
\,
...
.
..
'~ ...'
".. /iJ~ ' ' . ' . . . ,
~!\S~:~y/' .
t~/ ~"\".
~ ",,'I " \:.
:~ -!III /f"~ 9:'" ~'~ .
.. .~..,~
C - ,....z;:! ,..u.'¥;g~~ '.'
. '" ~ ~. CREEK '~'~$
1~'K
,~ ~,:1,'~. ~? ,
,{, ~ 4.#,:~~l"~' . .a!~ X "
. '.71'. . ~ ~ 'I X'. .; ..~ .' ~.," ;,iJ. CliEEJ<'
.. r. . . .
'J', C .' " - . . .
'",- ~ :J" . . . .: liP . . ' ' . . . '
. ",ft./. "'X ~ .,~
)..J/ . . ' :. - .'. ," - . .. .: . ( ,;
/.:: )1. ;.'. {. ." .! '1ixxj\'
. ,'1- ,'- , '
",,' . ,/ .' !~~)
'1../ .~ - . . '" . ' ' ' . ' . ;r - '.,..
/. ~.,.' ,;
.", i' ,'. ,.' ;1'
. i::"""""""
.f -~ ~ ...-.,.
~ :.'// - -- .. - . . . . .
- -,-' ---------
-- . . - .
! "
~
,.
\.
\:\
\
\\
..
IJ
l
./
.'
: ,j"
, . /
, ,
, I
, I
..
I I
, ,
,
,
,
" .
,
,
,
,
,
- .-
- -
.-
I
/.. '
.'
LEAD (mg/kg)
.
S HX)
.
X 101. 500
o 501. 1,000
C > 1,000
Fi gure 6.
Su rface 50' 1
1 lead d'
15tribution.
-------
TABLE 3. CONCENTRATIONS OF ARSENIC, CADMIUM, AND LEAD (mg/kg)
FOR ALL. MILL CREEK SOI~ PROFILES BY DEPTH INCREMENT
Depth Sample Geometric Coefficient of
(in) Size Mean Maximum Variation (%)
Arsenic
0-3 16 592 2,650 12
3-6 16 273 780 12
6-9 16 186 840 15
9-12 15 132 1,020 21
12-15 14 88 320 21
15-18 14 74 2,600 33
18-21 13 55 720 31
21-24 13 53 165 22
24-27 3 15 74 41
27-30 3 8 74 87
24-36 7 47 100 19
36-48 7 22 60 31
Cadmium
0-3 14 17 51 25
3-6 14 11 31 3S
6-9 14 3 24 102
9-12 14 2 18 179
12-15 14 1 11 268
15-18 14 1 23 484
18-21 13 1 8 17,992
21-24 13 1 12 1,106
24-27 3 1 1
27-30 3 1 1
24-36 7 1 8 1,550
36-48 7 1 1
~
0-3 16 369 1,750 17
3-6 16 68 740 33
6-9 16 29 558 42
9-12 15 20 548 39
12-15 14 11 179 34
15-18 14 12 943 52
18-21 13 11 354 45
21-24 13 11 28 25
24-27 3 10 13 15
27-30 3 8 17 26
24-36 7 10 17 13
36-48 7 6 10 14
-------
show similar trends. Arsenic is concentrated in the top six inches. In
the majority of the soil profiles, arsenic concentrations are below 100
me/kg at 18 inches, and approach background levels established for this
area below 42 inches.
For cadmium and lead, the highest concentrations are also found in the top
six inches of the profiles. However, cadmium and lead concentrations
decrease more rapidly with depth than do arsenic concentrations. In the
aajority of the profiles, cadmium levels are less than detection limits
(1.2 or 1.5 mg/kg) below nine inches, and lead levels are within the range
of background concentrations below six inches.
Quarternary alluvial deposits underlie the Mill Creek site and supply
domestic well water for the area. The water table beneath Hill Creek is
,enerally 20 feet or deeper below the ground surface depending upon
seasonal flow. Domestic tap water in Mill Creek has been sampled on three
occasions. The first sampling occurred on December 5 and 17, 1985, and the
second on Hay 20 and 21, 1986, and a third set of samples were collected on
March 24 and 25, 1987.
Resul~s of water analyses are shown in Table 4. All household tapwater
analyses were within U.S. EPA primary drinking water criteria and State of
Montana primary drinking water standards for arsenic, cadmium, and lead.
Bowever, during the Hay 1986 sampling, seven household water supplies were
found to have detectable arsenic levels (Table 4). Cadmium and lead
concentrations were generally at or below detection limits. From a
multiple exposure standpoint all contributions to arsenic exposure are
important to consider. It is likely that wells yielding arsenic
contaminated waters are locally contaminated from soils introduced into the
wells.
Mill Creek, the major surface drainage system in the area, was sampled fOl1t
times between April 1985 and April 1986. as part of the smeltel
investigation. Sampling station locatIons are shown in Figure 7. ArsenlC
-25-
-------
O(C MY
19.5 1986
MOUU SAH'lE SAte'lE
NO. NO. NO.
1
)
Me-Il
Me-I
4
,
Me-l
Me-)
,
II
IZ
Me-'
Me-5
IJ
14
Me-4
15
21
Me-"
Il
I'
Me-"
lO
lJ
Me-21
Me-IO
11
2.
Me-21
Me-'
2S
26
ftC-1l
ftC-II
29
HC-'
)0
He-'
)I
)2
He-IS
II
It( -10
14
ttC}t
H(" He.ll'
118-£.\1-016
\6
MAIeH
I'"
SAMPlE
NO.
Me-IOI lll-'Y-1Il
1tC-10) lll-'"-II]
Me-IOl 221-'"-004
1tC-104
1tC-105 221-511-001
Me-IO'
ItC-U5
ltC-loa
ltC-I"
ltC-1M
ltC-Ill
Me-IIO
1tC-1l'
ltC-III 228-'"-020
1tC-IU
Me-114 221-'"-011
228-'"-018
ftC-121 22'-'"-015
ftC-121 228-'"-016
22'-'"-029
22'-'"-0)0
ftC-1I5
He-I 16
H(-120
H(-II" 118.1;11-0))
ttC.1I8
TABLE 4.
10IAlI
OISS.
(Bet 5 I I'. 1..5.
0( C 19.5 SAIt'U
(UII/lI
Cd
AI
)I
)0
( ')
( ')
( ')
( ')
11
. .
( I
I
( 2
( 2
( 1
( 1
,
. .
2
I
( )
( .
( I
( I
I
.
HILL CREEK WELL VATER ANALYSES
lit»
16
II
c 4
c 4
c 4
c 4
c 4
( 4
'2
18
( 4
( 4
( 4
( 4
'>,
(HI, 20. 21 "1986.
MA' 1986 SAHPlE
( ug/l.
Cd
AI
c 5
c 5
c 5
c 5
c 5
c 5
c 5
c 5
( S
( S
( S
( ')
( ')
( ~
( ."
c )
( )
c )
( )
c )
( )
6
)4
4
( )
( )
( )
( J
. )
lit»
U. S. EPA WftE
(Hlrt~ Z4.2S 19.,.
( 101-.
MAIICH "., SAtRE
(ug/l)
AI Cd lit»
-------~:ii---~:iij--;ii:~:;;i----i-----ii----~-i----~-j--------~----~-S--i-~-j--------i--;:;6--~--i--~i:2----ii----~iii;d-2;-;;-;;;-------------------
D 5 'Il 4 ( 5 ()
, It c I 1 1.1 ( 5 () 10 0.6) ( I (1.2 51 ...... ... - pralllbl, around .."
. ZO (I I I.' (5 4
, (ID (I ( I 4 ( 5 )
. (10 I I (4 (5 )
, (4 (5 ()
D (4 ( 5 4
, ( 5 ( 2 S (4 ( 5 ()
D ( 5 (2 () (4 ( 5 ()
, (II (I (I (4 ( 5 ()
. (10 I I (4 (5 ()
, ( 5 (2 ( ) (4 ( 5 ()
D c 5 c 2 () (4 ( 5 ()
, (10 I ) (4 ( 5 ()
o II 2 ) (4 ( S ()
, (10 (I I (4 ( 5 ()
o clO I I (4 (5 .()
, (4 ( 5 ()
0(4 (5 ()
, ( 5 c 2 c ) c 4 c 5 c' )
o c 5 6 () c 4 c 5 c)
, c 4 c5 4
0(4 c 5 c)
, 11 2.' (4 ( 5 1
o clO 2 4 (4 ( 5 )
1 11 ( 5 ()
o 19 (5 ()
1 c 5 c 2 c) (4 ( 5 ()
0(5 (2 () (4 (5 ()
, ( 5 c Z () (4 ( 5 ()
0(5 c 2 () (4 ( 5 ()
1 c 5 (2 () (4 ( 5 ()
0(5 c 1 c) (4 ( 5 ()
, clO c I I
o clO c I I
1 10 c I I
o 10 c I (I
1 clO c I I
o clO c I 1
1 clO I I
o clO I I
1 (10 (I 2
o (10 (I I
1
o
,
o
I
o
I
II
I
o
2.1 0." ( I cO.2
1.4 D." ( I (0.2
c I 0.54 c I cO.l
IIg
lIEU
0( PI"
(ft.
COtltEIRS
"
"
.J6 to 41 ,r old
SIIare, Mell wllh HOuse M8. ]
10
IZ
Il ,r old
12
6D
At lea,t J ,r old
Haull water fr.. anatonda
III.IZI Yell 'I. II ,r oldi lIeil '2. 15 ,r old
( I 0.68 c I cl.2
( I 1.14 c I cO.2
( I 1.54
I (8.1
I) 0.45 c I c8.2
( I 0.'5 ( I cO.l
c I 0.69 4.) cO.2
( I 0.6' c I cl.2
c I 0.4) ( I cO.2
c I 0.66 ( I
16 0.'>" « i
(0.1
«0.1
6D
Drilled
liS
SIIar. Mell wlt~ Houle M8. I'. 15 ,r old
zs ,r old
Appr.I...tel, 20 ,r .Id
6D
55
At 'ea,t II ,r o'd
Yel' age Ippl. 10 ,r
50
65
llell 1.,II(ed In 191)
110
II
Shlrel Nell with Houle M8. 29
Hind dug. 19.01 or 1950s
III
10 'I' old
'11111
Hend ~U9. 19COs or 19'>Os
Ap~.-pl.d Jul. 1986 A~_- SZ_P~
-------
1s consistently present in Hill Creek
analytical detection limits (4 ug/1).
range between 12 and 32.2 ug/l. Zinc
up to 18 u,/l.
in concentrations above the
Concentrations of total arsenic
has also been detected; values ranged
.
Streambed sediments were sampled in Mill Creek in April and July 1985, as
part of the Anaconda Smelter Remedial Investigation. Trace metal
concentrations in the streambed sediments vere consistently lover than in
the surrounding soils.
Airborne release of hazardous substances occurred duri~g smelter operations
at the Anaconda Smelter. Fugitive transport of dust containing hazardous
substances from the site persist even after smelter shutdovn in 1980. Of
major concern are releases of arsenic, cadmium, and lead because of the
potential human health hazards associated vith these compounds.
Until the fugitive transport of hazardous substances from the Sme1~er Hill
area into the Hill Creek area is remediated, the continued contamination
(or recontamination) of the area vill occur at a rate of 1.5 ug/kg soil per
year. This potential for continued human exposure and recontamination
greatly reduc~s the effectiveness that other alternatives involving soil
excavation (i.e., clean up of the site) might have. Recent Hi Vol air
sampling data indicate that highly contaminated particulates continue to be
deposited on the community despite the efforts to control source materials
on Smelter Hill.
Samples of airborne particulate matter are collected at four locations in
the vicinity of the Anaconda Smelter site using Hi-Vol samplers. The
locations of these sampling stations are shovn on Figure 7. Samples
collected at these sites vere analyzed for total suspended particulates
(T5P), respirable particulate, and trace metal content. The mean and range
of concentrations of arsenic, cadmium, lead, copper, and zinc in airborne
particulate samples collected at each statioft during 1984 are shown on
Table 6.
-27-
-------
"
--
I. \
\.....--
~c;-
MCo7 :--.,.....
"
Clear c..-* _. . ~
\. .'" - -
- "' ~- ~
;
o
,
...
-".
,
o
Figure 7.
W/iAM Sl'RIHGS ~
..' .
.,'
,.
W.- ~- ~ ./""
.'''.~ ...J'
.".. -- .~
K$
:::
,I
'.
.~
:~
::! .J
: Of )
,.
c.
\
\
.J
IM:N
II
MC-I
6 MCoI
wc.7~,\
c//
~
, .
/
.f
I
""--
\
I
@
&
o
AlA MONITORING ST A T10NS
SURFACE WAiER STATlONS
WEL1.S
.
Locations of surface water, groundwater, and
air monitoring stations in the Hi 11 Creek study
area.
-------
TABLE 5. ARITHMETIC AVERAGE AND GEOMETRIC MEAN CONCENTRATIONS
OF TOTAL SUSPENDED PARTICULATES, ARSENIC, CADMIUM,
AND LEAD AT MILL CREEK (ug/m3)a
Arithmetic Geometric
Average Mean
Total suspended
particulates 27 19
Arsenic 0.039 0.015
tadmi um 0.004 0.002
Lead 0.03 0.02
Range of
Concentration
Minimum Max1murn
3
0.001
187
0.681
0.001
0.01
0.112
0.32
a April, 1984 through March, 1986. excluding data collected during the M,ll
Creek Park construction. October 2. 1985 through October 22. 1985.
-------
TAiLE 6. MEAN CONCENTRATIONS AND RANGES OF TRACE ELEMENTS IN
RESIDENTIAL DUST AND INDOOR AIR
Residential Dust
(Vacuumed) Indoor Respira~le
MI/KI Arsenic Arsenic (u,/1I )
Ave (Ian,e) Ave (lan,e)
1111 Creek 264 0.019
(104-386) (0.011-0.131)
Anaconda '8 0.007
Opportunity 62 0.005
-------
A review of current air quality data vas
concentrations for arsenic, cadmium, and
backlround levels were established based
Arizona, Montana, Utah, and Vashington.
conducted to establish background
lead. The folloving estimates of
on data collected by the states of
Element
ul/m3
0.01
0.01
0.04
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
In aeneral, arsenic data collected at the Highvay Junction monitoring
station located east of Anaconda vas a factor of ten (0.1 u'/m3) ,reater
than the background concentration. On December 29, 1984 a maximum of 2.0
ul/m3 of arsenic vas measured at the site. A maximum concentration of
0.681 u,/m3 vas measured at the Mill Creek monitoring station. The
geometric mean concentration fo~ the Mill Creek station vas 0.015 ug/m3
(TablJ 5).
No regulations specifically applicable to arsenic and cadmium that are
applicable to the Mill Creek RI/FS curently exist under the Clean Air Act
or the Toxic Substances Control Act.
Household dust samples collected in selected homes in Mill Creek indicate
that elevated levels of arsenic, lead, and cadmium are present. Daily
exposure to these hazardous substances in household dust is likely.
Results of vacuum dust and indoor respirable dust sampling are summarized
in Table 6.
E. Surface and Subsurface Pathvays of Migration
On the basis of the available data on environmental levels, it can be
concluded that the soil in the Town of Hill Creek is highly contamin~ted
with arsenic and other toxic metals derived from the Anaconda Smelter sIte
Significantly elevated levels of arsenic have also been reported at times
-------
in airborne particulates near the site, in residential dusts, and in the
drinking vater. Other communities around the smelter have been found to
have much lover levels of contamination.
For Mill Creek children, direct ingestion of soil is the most likely route
of exposure to hazardous contaminants from the Anaconda Smelter site. For
adults and children, the important potential exposure pathvays are
inlestion of contaminated drinking vater, inhalation, and inlestion of
airborne dirt and household dust.
The total environmental exposure, and therefore the actual risk, of the
children of Mill Creek to arsenic is compounded by the many routes of
exposure. The combined ingestion of soil, dust, and drinking vater and the
inhalation exposure to airborne arsenic can be considered additive. A
portion of the inhaled particles may also be ingested.
F. Location and Number of Affected Receptors
Public health concerns have been addressed in the Endangerment Assessment
(Clement 1987). The risk assessment identified the general M1ll Creek
populace as a potential receptor of environmental trace metal
contamination, and further identified "ill Creek children as a population
of particular concern because children are likely to ingest appreciable
amounts of soil and because high levels of urinary arsenic have been
measured in "ill Creek children.
III.
ENFORCEMENT (Confidential)
For enforce8ent analysis see confidential Attachment I.
IV.
COMMUNITY RELATIONS
Beginning vith the first nevspaper reports that "ill Creek resid€nt~ ma\ be
relocated, community concern at the Operable Unit has been high. On
-32-
-------
several occasions, new information about the Operable Unit has been front-
paae nevs in area nevspapers and has occasionally attracted full camera
crevs from television stations in Salt Lake City, Utah. An active
community-based aroup, the M1l1 Creek residents Association, vas formed in
May 1986, to present a united front in aaining consideration for vievs of
the residents of M1ll Creek. This aroup presented EPA vith a list of
de.ands, seekina EPA's aareement to consider remedial options that vould
allow some people to stay and others to move out of the community. EPA
.,reed to consider that request. Other demands included mental health care
for residents sufferina from stress related to Superfund activities, and
full replacement value for any Mill Creek homes that EPA may buy during a
permanent relocation.
Durina the course of the RI/FS, EPA representatives, including the director
of the R8gion VIII Vaste Management Division from Denver, have met vith
Mill Creek residents. EPA has had numerous discussions vith AHC, the
aeneral public, and federal, state, and local agencies. Details on
correspondence, meetings,and other interactions among the interested
parties are included in the Responsiveness Summary and the Administrative
Record for the site. All of the interested groups and entities have been
consulted in plannina and conducting the investiaations and evaluations.
All have been invited to and have attended monthly meetings
-------
A public meeting vas held on December 23, 1986, to inform the public of the
availability of 1he Draft RIIFS reports for Mill Creek. The public comment
period of the Draft RIIFS vas scheduled from December 23, 1986, to February
4. 1987. The comment period vas extended from its originally scheduled
period to January 20, 1987.
Key concerns regarding the remedial alternatives considered in the FS are
addressed in the Responsiveness Summary (attached).
The State of Montana and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
have concurred in the selected remedy.
v.
ALTERNATIVES EVALUATION
Mill Creek, Montana is being addressed as an operable unit of the Anaconda
Smelter NPL Site (40 CFR Subsection 300.68(C». Mill Creek is a community
of approximately 160 acres in size vhich is immediately southeast of the
Anaco~da Smelter. The community originally consisted of 37 residences,
hovever, folloving recent acquisition of properties by ARCO, only 8
residences are currently occupied.
EPA does not intend at this time to address all public health and
environmental problems present in Mill Creek. The limited number of
regional environmental issues not addressed in the Mill Creek RI/FS vill be
addressed under subsequent operable units. EPA's primary objective for the
Mill Creek operable unit is protection of the health of the residents of
Mill Creek. This includes both short-term and long-term protection of
public health. Tvo categories of alternatives vere presented in the RIIFS
to support this objective: (1) cleanup alternatives, and (2) the permanent
relocation alternative. For the cleanup alternatives, EPA's objective vas
permanent protection of public health vithin the boundaries of the
community to the maximum ,xtent possible at this time and to not contribure
to environmental problems. For the permanent relocation alternarive. EPA'~
objectives are adequate protection of the current residents of Hill Creek
-34-
-------
consistent with paragraph 121(d)(1) of SARA, supplemented by interim
controls in Mill Creek to minimize short-term public health problems for
current non-residents who may visit or pass through the area. Subsequent
operable units of the Anaconda Smelter NPL site will address the long term
public health and environmental issues associated with regional
contamination problems.
The selected remedy of permanent relocation of Mill Creek residents,
tOlether with temporary site stabilizati~n, was determined in the RIIFS to
be a more reliable remedy over the long term. The selected remedial
alternative is required by Section 101(24) of CERCLA to be "more
cost-effective than and environmentally preferable to the transportation,
stora,e, treatment, destruction, or secure deposition off-site of hazardous
substances or may othervise be necessary to protect the public health or
welfare". The National Contingency Plan (NCP) requires that the selected
remedy be "cost-effective" and one that effectively "mitigates and
minimizes thr~ats to and provides adequate protection of public health and
welfare and the environment" (40 CFR subsection 300.68(i)(I». Unless
specified exceptions apply, the selected remedy must attain or exceed
applicable or relevant and appropriate Federal and State requirements.
Remediation of the environmental effects resulting from the existing ~ite
contamination vill not be a direct objective of the selected remedial
alternative for Mill Creek. Hovever, implementation of the Mill Creek
remedial response vill not cause significant increases in adverse impacts
to the environment. The temporary site stabilization will provide some
environ88fttal protection. Environmental effects of the existing
contamination will be addressed in the Anaconda Smelter site RI/FS.
In accordance with Section 300.68(f) of the NCP, EPA has developed
alternatives which address the following categories:
-35-
-------
Description
. Alternatives for treatment or disposal at an off-site
facility.
Category
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Alternatives vhich attain applicable or relevant and
appropriate public health or environmental standards.
Alternatives vhich exceed applicable or relevant and
appropriate public health or environmental standards.
Alternatives vhich do not attain applicable or relevant
and appropriate public health or environmental standards
but vill reduce the likelihood of present or future threat
from the hazardous substances and which provide
significant protection to public health, welfare, and the
environment. This must include an alternative which most
closely approaches the level of protection provided by the
applicable or relevant standards.
No action alternative.
A total of 12 remedial action alternatives vere developed through the
course of the Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RI/FS) for the
community of "ill Creek, Montana. These 12 alternatives are listed belovo
The s,ecific category (see above) addressed by each alternative is also
included:
Alternative 1:
Alternative 2:
Alternative 3:
Alternative 4:
Alternative 5:
Alternative 6:
Alternative 7:
Alternative 8:
Relocation of all residents.
Category
1*
Complete soil removal from private property
to RCRA facility.
1
Complete soil removal from private property
with on-site disposal.
4
Partial soil removal with on-site disposal,
partial soil till.
4
Partial soil fill and sod cap, partial soil
till.
4
Partial soil fill and sod cap.
4
Common response action.
4
Partial relocation
4
-36-
-------
Alternative 9:
Relocation of houses
4
Alternative 10:
Relocation of sensitive population
4
Alternative 11:
No action
5
Alternative 12:
Complete soil removal vith no future
institutional controls
2 or 3*
. This alternative satisfies AlARs identified for the limited
operable unit and interim remedial action objectives. It
does not address AlARs for a permanent remedy.
.. Vhether alternative meets or exceeds ARAKs depends on depth
of soil removal and replacement.
An additional alternative vhich included temporary
relocation of residents until the permanent remedy vas
implemented vas included in the addendum to the RIfFS.
A summary of the major components of each remedial alternative is included
in Figure 8.
The temedial action alternatives were subjected to preliminary public
health and environmental screening and cost screening pursuant to 40 CFR
Sectio~ 300.68 (g). Through this screening, alternatives which would not
offeroadequate protection of public health and environment were eliminated
from further consideration. Cost screening was conducted to eliminate
alternatives which far exceed the cost of other alternatives and would not
offer substantially greater protection of public health.
An alternative for relocation only of families with children betveen the
.ges of 2 and 6 (alternative 10) vas eliminated because it vould fail to
provide lone-term protection of public health of families who remain, move
into, or visit Hill Creek frequently. The other alternative eliminated
during screening was for complete soil removal from private property ~ith
disposal at an off-site RCRA disposal facility (Alternative 2). This
alternative vou1d provide essentially identical public health ~rote~tlon ~~
disposal of the soil at the Anaconda Smelter site (AlternatlV€ 3) but at
nearly ten times the cost of the on-site disposal alternatives. The No
-37-
-------
"emedlal Acllon Alt..nall".
. "elocellon o' All .
"esldent.
a Complete SoU "emo,," . . . . .
with Oll-SU. Dlspo.al
-- ---. --
3 Comple'. SoH ".mo"aI . . . . .
wUh On-SU. Dlspou'
--
4 P.rllal 5011 "emoval . . . . .
wUh On-SUI Disposal
-
I P.rllal Soil fin. Sod . . . . .
, and Parllal TIll
I
II Parllal Soli fIN and Sod . . . . .
J Common ".SpOll" . . . . .
Acllona Onl,
I Parllal "elocallon . . . . .
. "elocallon 01 Hou... . . .
10 "elocallon o' . . . . .
Sen.tllve Populallon
----
II No Acllon . .
-" Comr.'ele Soli Aemoval. . . . . . . . .
12 'n.' ecllve Inslllullona'
Conlro's
. . .
--
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . .
. . . . .
. . . .
. . .
~- N. ...:'he ~ M -.. "~.T:'i Of i-ouiT J .
~-- Ihl. AIt.rnall". Could b. Combined wllh AIt..nall".. "2 Ihrough "7 --~
~~-
.
. . .
Figure 8.
Summary
of Remedial
Action Alternatives
-------
Action alternative, by definition, vou1d also fail public health and
environmental screening, but for comparison purposes vas retained during
detailed analysis of the remaining alternatives. Detailed technical,
institutional, public health, environmental, and cost analyses vere
performed for the remaining ten remedial action alternatives, including the
No Action alternative. The major findings of these analyses are summarized
in Table 7.
An assessment of the reliability of each remedial alternative vas conducted
and is summarized in Figure 9. For comparison purposes, the remedial
alternatives considered can be divided into 4 general groups as follovs:
Group
No Action
Partial Soil Removal
Complete Soil Removal
Relocation
Alternative I
11
4, 5,
2, 3,
1, 8,
6, 8, 10
12
9, 10
Protectiveness
EPA's Superfund Program has established a 10-6 excess cancer risk as_its
1081 for cancer risk reduction. On a site specific basis, the Agency can
establish a remedial action objective of betveen 10-4 and 10-7 excess
cancers. Soil capping, soil replacement, or relocation of residents vould
bring the estimated skin cancer risk to 4.7 x 10-5 (average case) and 1.7 x
10-4 (reasonable maximum case) vithin the range of 10-4 to 10-7. Only
Alternatives 1 and 12 (or alternative 3 combined vith soil removal or
cappinl on AMC property) vould reduce the excess skin cancer risk to 4.7 x
10-5 (aver..e case) and 1.7 x 10-4 (reasonable maximum case) for all
residents and/or all areas of the site.
The No Action alternative vas rejected because it failed to adequately
protect public health. Alternatives dealing vith partial soil removal Ver€
determined to be unreliable becau~e certain areas in the community vOllld
not be remediated and effective institutional controls vere not available
-39-
-------
TABLE 7.
OetaUed AnllVIII Summary
&.,....-..... .'th'
.... (rI." '-1 C.-c.,.1 I........ I....~ ,...a I ,..., I,.....,'
. "48<1.. .1... hM
1-,' ,'.. ,....- "'41"''''''''' ,..l1li;1.,. I-u.' '''I I.un "" ...""..,,1 '...J.II -... ..... '''''1
-- .
. ........ . ..- l. t " ,... a.-,' eo.... "';:..t." ...',': hs4."'111 -.. '''"'''' 111:'1: ,,,;,"~" ~.: It,...." "'..'" .....1 ........
",,,,.,'1'" """,1' It, ,..1..,-. ,......... -..-., ..... '" C.......,.. '''1 ..,. C.U c." b.. eo.. 10.. e... h.. ... It.. c.,. ~.. (..,
......:.... .. au ..... I .... ......,... .... Au.., .. ... .......,. "..u .'1'''"'' .......:" '.1' M '.11'1' 1...1' I."'" '.8I/'M t.III." 11.1 II.' .18 .. II "'''''''' .',; 'I.'..~
.., '''.U ..-:.. ......... "... ....,., ,..,,1," .,... I. ....t. .""'11 ""1.8' N.'." .,-1." ".-.... ..II" '-lac. ,......1 ~ I ).'''.1(,
"II~" N, .. II.." ., ........, ''1' .... II. ..,.. ,......1; . 1.'0.).5CIIi
,..."" "1'1. .11. .1...... ,....,1: 11.101.-
..... .,...,. ,....,1: ./t...,.8W
. C"".,,"II.. -."0.' . I' , ..a., ,,,,,,.'. MC"" '..h.a ...,..,.:..: ... "''''''1, ...,...., ...1, ,...,.., .'1" t_",es ! "... ...... '..,.., ,. ....Ct I."'" 11.1 .... 1.11 I. II I'e..;.. ...~~..; '..'~..A:
.)..' ..... "t.... a"........" ... ","#tU ''''. ..I h . h.' ...... .. I..... ""'.1' 111.1. II ""'.11 ..... I' .,. Mea ,.....1: ".""".UI
""'~" -'.. '" Afr! ,.......,; "uti ., ........ -II.U ..:8, t.. ",. ,.1' -M 1.11'" I.." 1....1» '.8I/'M 0.111." "' 11.1 I" '" '1. ..,- ,_a..I; 1'.'''.8<01
"II .,......- ... ... U",. h ".., ..~,.....:..'. ...- .," '.""" .'.'..' .,.,." '" ".1' .,..... "'18';' ,......1; au .'~.J.'OC
...." MI'" ...1. '.-c.. IIIC I ..... I."'" I..'" 1.11'" '.".M ,.... II.' 11.1 ... 1.110
-.c.u..", .. .''''' tr....., .1.... "1'1.18 ....... .......
.. ..,.,..-.. .-.
. ','1'" k" '1' ,... " I .. , ""t ""'." 1(<<,.' "I..t. ........,,: .....,..,....., 15", «.....,.., "'... ..II.M 1.11-" 1-.'" '.'1-81 '.8I/.M I. I.." 11.1 11.1 e.18 '.11 I. ..,. "",,"'. . '.''''.-
...., _"~I ..Ua .""."" .,........:. 'a"'" ,,':"'11.... I. .....,.,.,.... . ... ..... .'.I.S' "..'.1' "".1' .,..... u- ..,. ,..".,.; .,.."'.-
.,.~..I. '''''t'- """ .""'",,; Acuu ............ ....,.., "I' I.I..M '.11'81 I."'" I."," I.HI'M 1.111." '''' II.' .... .... .I''''ea ,,,,~.,I: '..111.-
kU ..11 ... ft, "Urle: ,..,. .... .""'" .1.1.. ",..... ",.t." ....... .""ea ......1. 1/.'".-
"...... III( ....... '.11-8' ...... ...,." '."'.11 ,..'" II.' "., C.I' '.18
"""" ."1.. ....... ....... ."1."
., '''''''' k" 'II' ,.. I .. I ...... """" .u... ,,., ..,. ""''''': C...,.., tI'., .. 11-81 ....... I..'" 1....1. '.81/,,, t.'.'" II.' 11.1 1.18 1.11
... ... C... ,... ..'......... ......, ,.....Jc..... a. "'" 011'1." ......11 "".11 ..... II
..a' .... I'U ... """": "'ce.. ...,'.. Pr', '."'M 1.11.81 ...... ,...." I.""" '...,." 11.1 II.' .... .... 11."'.01»
... ... ..."..t" '''.. ..... .........., ....... ....... ""..1. .......
...... MC 1.11-" ,...." ...... I."'" I."," I."," II.' 1/.1 I." ....
"""" ....... ......18 ""'.11 ......
I. ,.,.u.. Ie" "" ... . I. . '"'" ".....e, ac"" ,....... ""''''': W'''' "'r .. ..." '.11-" I..'" 1....1. '.81/ -81 '.'11'" II.' I'" .18 '."
... ... C. .........,. ,.... ... ,,,''',",,,,. .... ..... ....... .,,,.,, ",..... .......
IfI( """1,: Ace... ....,... ...,. 1.11'" 1."'81 I..'" '..,." ,...." ,..,,, ,1.8 11.1 .... 1.18 II. -.-
.... ... ..."..1,...... .It. "",'1, .'.1." ."1." "".11 .......
''''''' 11ft( ....... 1.11-81 1.81'" I."," '.""11 ,.'" ... II.' II.' 1.1' 1.18
.,...,,, .,.... ....." "".11 .. -.."
I. (-- ........ ... . I.... "...'t. IC«'" "".1. '''''''''a: C.",'" ...... '.11'1' 1.11-81 I..," 1."'81 ,...." I." ," II.' 11.1 .... '.18
1&,.... ""'''.1' "..,.., '''' III" ... ..... ........ ....... "'''.11 .......
'''''''''..,. ... .,... .,. 1."'1" ."'" ....... ....." '."'.M ,..'" II.' II.' I." 1.18 ".110.-
...c ""''''': Ac"u .11. ......,., ....... "'1." ........ .......
'...,.,...... ''''''''.111( I."," '."'81 ....... I..," ,...... ,..... II.' 1/.1 II' '"
""''''1 ........ "'1." ....." III .....
I. ......., ...",. ....,...... ..., """ ""c...a"" ""ate """'1,: h. """iI "'" .-... .. ......... ...,.....: ...... ...,,....... . ""'.'" In'''''': ..... .......... -.... . I""'" . ...,. ....,... I,. t. 11.&1"."
....... .......,., 8IC,.. ......'..,.... J 'ar.... ......,., ......,... I.
...1...... ........,.,. I. t--'I, ......,....... .... .......11.., J: ".IIiI."
t.. .. III( ''''''''''': Ace... ...,.1, .. ,'u..... '11"". ,....1)
....'... '" ... ... ,.." t,. '''.'
"".""
..,...."
I' ............. .... . .. , ,..r. ""'c..".-4 ..I.uh' .....; .. "''''' .t....." .... ........ '.II-M '.11'" '..-1' '..,." '.81/," t.'.'" II.' II.' .... I. " 1I."iI.'"
-...., ......'., ."... .,., WI' ".""".., .. ....,... ..,..I. ... '''''' .1".81 .. ".11 ""'.11 ."1."
..'....... ..11 I.....: ..,...
., .u ''''''et ....
II. ... ... ,.. ... .., "'''''''' ... -"I.c.." ~'''''''''''' .., "'''IL'''' .. ......... . II " I..'" ..... 1.".81 ,...... .... "1 .... .... ..,. ..,. ao, "..hu."
.1'1." III.'." .'-1" .1.1...
" (..."" J.8U ......,. I .. J ,..., ""'''1, ..,." .. '.,...",,". ... I.. a.....,..... I I,...... .'1'" . "'1 1.'1." I..'. 1.11,81 I."'.M I.'. -at II.' .., t." '.'1 . ...,. '-..a'. I t.\W.8CIO
.,....' 'n...'" u.'''' ... .....,. ,...""".. ,.,.'" ......... ,. "'. .,." IIJ.' I' ".", "'-1" 01'" ,. .,...,.. ,...a..I. . I .81J.8o»
,."...,....- . ..." ,.. ,.,.... "'1,... .... . II" . 11," . ..,. 1.11"8 I.''','' ''. It II.' ..I ... ... '1,.,. --.....: 11.'''-
1..."h .... .., ..., .....,., 1I..I,f .1.'" 1111.. ,= ..... ,. ., '-ca ,...~..'. "' . It.) ...
" t,.,..,... '.....,e"" "'M "I It . M." ... .1' ,.,,,., .,.,,, ,,1 ... ... . I:
.'''''.'' "",.1 .... I~ ...." -.-. It
-------
Remedial
Alternatives
II' I R.loullon 01 H I I
AlA R esldenl. legend
~ J CompIeI. Soil Removal 2 5 1 10,11 15 11 11 22 H - High POlentlal '01 'Failu..
hom P.ivil. P'Gpe.lr L 10M H H L 10 H M LloM L 10M M
""II'" On-Sil. ()is .81
.4 Pallia' Soli R8II\O\tai 1 5 1 10,"12 15 18 20 22,23 M - Mode.al. Potenllal '0.
..111'1 On - Sil. ()ispoSII. M H H Ulo M M M M Fallu..
P:)'h., Soli 1..
.~ P"lia' Sod f.. Ind 1 5 1 10,12 15 19 19 22,23 L - Low Polenllal '0. Fallu.e
Sod Clp. P''''II Soil M H H H M H H M
',11
'6 Pa.III' So" f.. 5 1 10,13 15 19 19 22,24 NA - C.lte.lon Nol Applicable
Ind Sod Cap M H H H M H H H 10 Remedial -AUernaUve
., Common Respons. M 5 1 9 15 19 19 22, 5
Achon. H H NA M H H H
'1 3 3 31 Llo 3,10 ,15 Llo 3 Llo 3 Llo 3
P.,III' R.'ou8lon M/NA H/NA H/NA' H/NA UlNA H/NA H/NA H/NA
.t M/NA 3 3 3,1 L 103,9,10 ,15 Llo 3 Llo 3 Llo 3
RlIouli0ll 01 HOUI.I H/NA H/NA H/NA M/NA H/NA H/NA H/NA
. II No "cllon M 1 H 5 NA 8 NA 9 15 19 19 22,21
M H H NA
.12 Complel. Soil Removil 2 11 11 10,11 15 11 11 22
"Uumlf\C) Insllluhona' L 10 M L 10 H L 10 H LloH M LloM LloM M
eonlfols ..,.1 nol be Elleclive
AMC Properlv Options
1 5 1 9 15 19 19 22,21
f ellc. and Posl M H H NA M H H NA
1 5 1 10 15 19 19 22,23
I: sl.U,sh Vel}el'hOO M H H H M H H M
--------- - -- 10,12 19 22,23
1 5 1 15 19
1,.1,119 and Re~el}el'h()n M H H H M H H M
-----'. -------- ----- ---- ----- --------'--- ---- ---- 22
1 5 1 10 15 19 19
SOIl/ .II.,,<} w,.n M H H H M H H M
'~t:'\oI.'.WI..11on
-- - - - ------- -- ----- - - " ---- .-' " -j(fiT -'- ---.-- ---
'} 6 1 15 11 91 22
50.1 H~.n()"al, SOIl LloM H H LloH M LI,M lloM M
/,11 ..o./IIp..l'",'I..hOIl
I ----
Figure 9.
Potential Failure Ranking
Matrix
-------
to prevent others from building nev homes in these areas and significant
risk levels vould remain for areas vhere soil vas not removed. Soil
removal to a depth of 18 inches throughout Hill Creek vas identified as
being less reliable and having a greater failure potential than did
permanent relocation or complete soil removal. Complete soil removal vas
considered less reliable than permanent relocation. Several factors lead
to this last conclusion: 1) long-term soil recontamination from adjacent
non-remediated sources, 2) potential failure of vegetative cover and, 3)
potential for continued direct contact if human activity disturbs the
cover. It was concluded that the permanent relocation alternative is
preferable and reliable in protecting the health of current Mill Creek
residents. This alternative provides adequate protection of the health of
these individual (see Table 7). By physically removing residents, direct
contact with contaminants is prevented. The remedy is reliable since there
are no technical components to "fail". In fact, urinary arsenic levels in
all residents that vere temporarily relocated in 1986 have decreased
further indicating the reliability of this alternative.
Cost E~fectiveness
A summary of th~ cost analyse, is presented-in Table 8.
with the lovest cost is Alternative 1: Relocation of all
should be noted that ARCO has currently relocated all but
leaving a net cost of $300,000 to complete this remedy.
The alternative
residents.
It
8 residences,
The cost for Alternative .1 does not, hovever, include the cost of soil'
cleanup. In the Feasibility Study, the cost of permanent relocation
including co.plete removal and replacement of 6 to 42 in. of soil vas
compared to limilar soil removal and replacement vith the residents
remaining in Mill Creek so that EPA could consider vhat the total remedial
costs vould be for Hill Creek vhen the interim remedy costs vere added to
projected costs of a potential final remedy. These comparative costs are
summarized belov:
-42-
-------
TABLE 8.
SUMMARY OF COST ANALYSES a
O&M Total
ae.edial Action Capital Costs Present Vorth Present Vorth
Alternative ($1,000) ($1,000) <$1,000)
Alternative 1A 1,470 20 1,490
Alternative 111 3,840 120 3,960
Alternative 112 5,740 120 5,860
Alternative 113 7,700 140 7,840
Alternative 114 15,240 220 15,460
Alternative 3A 3,300 360 3,660
Alternative 31 4,600 400 5,000
Alternative 3C 6,060 410 6,470
Alternative 3D 11,130 440 11,570
Alternative 4A 2,500 340 2,840
Alternative 41 2,610 350 2,960
Alternative 4C 2,970 360 3,330
Alternative 4D 4,240 390 4,630
Alternative 5 2,320 350 2,670
Alternative 6 1,970 330 2,300
Alternative 7 820 210 1,030
Alternative 8A 1,560 80 1,640
Alternative 811 2,320 130 2,450
Alternative 812 2,780 140 2,920
Alternative 813 3,280 150 3,430
Alternative 814 5,050 190 5,240
Alternative 9 1,820 20 1,840
Alternative 12A 4,140 410 4,550
Alternative 121 6,660 420 7.080
Alternative 12C 8,950 440 9,390
Alternative 12D 11,840 510 18,350
a Costs estimated to within .50% and -30%
-------
Alternative 1
Alternative 12
Soil
Depth
Soil Cleanup vith
Permanent Relocation
Soil Cleanup vithout
Permanent Relocation
6"
12"
18"
42"
5 3,840,000
5 5,740,000
5 7,700,000
515,240,000
5 4,140,000
$ 6,660,000
5 8,950,000
$17,840,000
Costs for permanent relocation are lover for all of the soil cleanup depths
even thoulh this alternative includes the cost of property acquisition.
This is because cleanup can be done at less expense usinl heavy equipment
after homes have been removed, than usinl more labor intensive cleanup
.ethods around houses. In addition, Alternative 1 provides the .reatest
protection to the current residents of Hill Creek by reducinl risks to
background levels. Alternative 1 is therefore the most cost effective
remedy consistent vith Subsection 101(24) of CERCLA. The temporary
relocation alternative (Alternative 113) vould have hilher total costs than
either Alternative 11 or 112 because of the additional costs to temporarily
relocate residents until implementation of the final remedy for the
-
Anaconda Smelter site.
Air quality modeling conducted during this remedial investigation
identified a very real problem of long-term recontamination of the
community of Hill Creek. This modeling identified a rate of
recontamination of the soils in Hill Creek of up to 1.5 ppm of arsenic per
year. The September, 1987 EPA Endangerment Assessment indicates that even
background levels of arsenic in soils pose skin cancer risks of 1.7 x 10-5
(maximum probable scenario). Soils could quickly become recontaminated
above bactcround levels and continue to become vorse. The source of this
recontamination is vindblovn dust from the smelter and surrounding
contaminated areas. Up to 10 square miles is significantly contaminated
with hilh levels of arsenic; vegetation is sparse and vind moves large
quantities of dust and soil. This problem viII be addressed in a later
regional operable unit. The "environmentally preferable" requirement for
permanent relocation in Subsection 101(24) of CERCLA is clearly satisfied.
-44-
-------
Preference for Treatment
Subsection 121(b) of SARA identifies a preference for implementation of
permanent solutions and us~ of alternative treatment technologies.
Alternative treatment technologies evaluated as part of the Mill Creek
IIIPS including a deep tilling of contaminated surface materials and
leachin, of contaminants from surface soils.
A pilot study vas conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of various
tillin, procedures in reducing the surficial soil arsenic, cadmium, copper,
lead, and zinc concentrations. Tvo plots located on Anaconda Minerals
Company property vere selected for the tilling project. Each plot vas
subdivided in half. Four t1111ng techniques vere employed, one on each of
the subplots.
The measurement of surficial soil metals concentrations before and
afte~tilling demonstrate the relative effectiveness of each treatment.
All surficial (0-1 in.) metals concentrations were reduced betveen 30 and
86 percent. A ~ean reduction in soil metals concentrations of 62 percent
vas calculated for all subplots. Hovever, this reduction in soil metals
vas not adequate to reduce exposure risks to acceptable levels.
A bench test vas conducted to evaluate the potential of using
topically-applied vater to leach the surficia~ contaminants farther into
the s01l horizon. Three sites in Mill Creek vere chosen to collect soil
profile s..ples. These sites represent slightly different soil types
throughout the community. It vas impossible to core undisturbed soil
columns. Therefore, columns vere recompacted to original site densities
and land depth intervals.
The results of the soil column leach bench test indicate that the metal
.
concentrations in surficial soils following leaching vould be suffi~lentl.
high to pose an unacceptable risk to public health. For the final
-45-
-------
permanent remedy, addltlonal testlng ~lll be necessary to satisfy
requirements concernlng alternatlve treatment technologies.
Compliance with Other Env1ronmental Laws
Subsection 121(d)(2) of CERCLA and 40 C.r.R. Section 300.68(i) together
require that the lead agency select a cost-effective remedy that
effectively mitigates and minimizes threats to and that provides adequate
protection of public health, welfare, and the environment. Except as
provided in Subsectlon 121(d)(4) of CERCLA, this requires selection of a
remedy that attains or exceeds applicable or relevant and appropriate
federal public health and environmental requirements identified for each
specific site.
A comprehensive analysls of Federal and State ARARs has been conducted to
identify and evaluate ARARs for all remedial alternatives considered in the
Mill Creek RI/FS. It is an attachment to the Feasibility Study report.
The identification of ARARs 1n the ARARs analysis was developed for
purposes of conducting an RI/FS. The following discussion selects the
ARARs that apply only to the selected alternative of permanent relocation
and temporary site stabilizat10n. ARARs associated ~ith a permanent remedy
will be selected in future operable unit decision selecting a final,
permanent remedy. If EPA determ1nes that relocation assistance should be
handled by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the action would
follow the rules pursuant to the Uniform Relocatlon Assistance and Real
Property Acquisitlon Policles Act of 1970 (44 CFR Part 25).
Federal AlARs
~
o
Primary and Secondary National Ambient Air Ouality Standards for
respirable partlculate and lead (40 CFR Part SO).
o
Montanas Air Ouality Bureau's requirements for particulate matter
and construct10n/demollt10n sltes (ARM Sections 16.8.821 and
16.8.1401(3) and (4».
-46-
-------
o
Federal Water Quality Criteria (40 CFR Part 131) criteria
for surface vater quality for aquatic life (Arsenic at
0.19 mq/l, Cadmium at 0.00066 mq/l, Lead at 0.0013 mq/l,
COpper at 0.0065 mq/l, Zinc at 0.059 mq/l).
o
OSHA requirements for an oecupational health and safety
program as vell as qeneral and construction industry
standards (29 CFR Part 1926 and 29 CFR Section 910.32).
o
EPA r8qulations coneerninq proper handlin9 and disposal
of asbestos materials durinq demolition acti~ities (40
cr~ Section 61.140, et seq).
Federal reqUirements reqardinq archaeoloq1cal and
historic preservation (40 elR 'art 6.301(C), 36 eFR Part
800, and 40 CFR Part 6.301(a and c».
o
o
Floodplain and wetland manaqement requirements to
minimize, to the extent possible, adverse 1mpac~s
associated vith activities in the floodplain (40 CFR Par~
6, Appendix A; 40 CF~ Sections 6.302 (a) and (b}i
Executive Order 11990; and Executive Order 119SS).
o
Clean Water Act Section 404 Dredge and Fill requ1reme~ts
(40 CFR parts 230, 231; 33 CfR par~ 323 and 330).
9
Archaeological and Histori~ Preser~at1on Act (16 U.S.C.
Section 469; 40 CFR Section 6.301(b}).
o
National Historic Preservation Act (16 U.S.C. Section
470; 40 erR Sec~ion 6.30t(b); and 36 CFR Part SOO}.
Endanqered Species Act of 1913 (16 a.s.c. Section 153i;
40 CFR Section 6.302(h); and SO erR Part 402).
o
Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (16 O.S.C. Sec~ion
1531; 40 C7R Section 6.302(q)}.
StatQ ARARS
o
o
State Historic Preservation Officer's clearance on
.ur~ace disturbance oc=~rrin9 during demolition of
structures.
o Junk Vehicles - MCA Sec~ions 7 - 10 - 504 and 522.
41
-------
Other Federal and State criteria, advisories, and guidance to ~
considerea:
a.
.
Health based performance qoals of 0.01 uq/m3 tor arsen11
and 0.01 uq/m3 tor cadmium air pollution (natural
backqround levels based in part on EPA carcinogenic
potency factors ("Health Assessment Document for
Inorqanic: Arsenic" March 1984, !PA-600/S-S3-02S1:i
"Updated Mutaqenicity and Carc1noqen1e1ty Assessment of
Cadmium: Addendum to the Health Assessment Cocument for
Cadmium (May 1981 )"i June 1985, IPA-600/S-93-02SF and
EPA's tarqet risk level of 1 x 10-6 and risk range o~ 1
x 10-4 to 1 x 10-7 (Public Health Evaluation Manual,
1986 ) .
b.
See Table 5.2-3 ot Feasibility Study report.
Other Federal Criteria, Advisories, Guidance and Sta~e
Standards in NCP at SO Fed. 189. 47949-47950.
c:.
Ocerable Unit Consistencv vith the Final Remedy
Permanent relocation as a first operable unit is consistent wi~~
any final remedy that EPA may select at a later date (40 C~~
Section 300.6S(c». EPA can elect to clean the vacated towns1:a
in any-manner determined appropriate after the residents have ceen
relocated.
VI.
SZLECTEC REMEDY
Based on the evaluation ot the remedial ac~ion alternatives in
accordance with the NCP (40 CFR 300.68) ana FS quidance,
Alternative No.1, Relocation of All Residents, has been
identified as the preferred remedial ac~1on alternative.
4,.
-------
This alternative involves buyout of all property owners in the town c
Creek and may require condemnation of the community by the United St.
the State of Kontana in order to accomplish the relocation of those
residents who do not wish to relocate. Demolition of structures wou:
conducted and the entire site would be fenced and posted followini
relocation of residents.
Temporary stabilization would be performed followin! demolition of
structures. Disturbed areas of the site would be stabilized from ere
forces by establishin! and maintainin! veletation on those areas.
Because the Kill Creek area is immediately adjacent to hi,hly contam:
areas of the Anaconda Smelter site, there is potential for continued
transport of contaminants into the area. For this reason, and to en~
consistency of the remedy for Hill Creek with that for the remainder
smelter site, it was decided to consider the final remedy in the Hil:
area in conjunction with the implementation of the final remedy for
Anaconda Smelter site.
For the detailed analysis of alternatives, Section 300.68(h)(2) of tJ
specifies that an evaluation of reliability. implementability, and
constructability be conducted. Alternative No.1 would be the most
reliable alternative, being easily implemented with little or no
probability of failure. The alternative is institutionally manageab
Condemnation or other legal procedures could be required to implemen
complet. relocation of residents.
The per8&ftent relocation of all Hill Creek residents is an effective
of eliain.tin, the public health threat to the current resident popu
Total relocation of residents would eliminate the pathways of exposu
the resident population to contam1nated soil, water, and air sources
remedy would therefore effectively mitigate and minimize threats to
provide adequate protection of public health on an interim basis.
-49-
-------
Useful life of this interim remedial action vould be indefinite for the
relocated residents of Hill Creek. For the tovn site, the useful life
vould be until implementaion of the final remedy. Fences and signs vould
be required or replaced as necessary to maintain property access control.
A final remedy vill be required to ensure long-term protection of public
health and the environment.
Total relocation of all Hill Creek residents vould be of moderate
difficulty in terms of implementability. Demolition of all structures at
the Mill Creek site could be readily implemented. Revegetation actions on
disturbed areas could. be easily implemented, but phytotoxicity, semi-arid
climate, or other site limitations could adversely affect the establishment
of a stable vegetative cover.
The time required to implement this remedial action alternative is
dependent on the villingness of the residents to relocate and the
institutional issues associated vith the relocation action. Once
relocation is complete, demolition, fencing, and posting activities could
be i~lemented rapidly.
Total relocation of all Hill Creek residents poses fey safety concerns for
the relocating population. Vorker safety concerns for this alternative
include those concerns associated vith conventional demolition activities,
namely accidental injuries resulting from the use of heavy equipment and
movement of debris. No long-term safety concerns for the resident
,
population are associated vith this remedy.
Iaple.entation of this remedial alternative would not alter the extent of
site contaaination. Potential adverse impacts during implementation
include short-term increases in vindblovn dust associated with demolition
of structures and localized destruction of vegetation and wildlife habitat.
-50-
-------
Constructability, as such, is not applicable to this action.
Consistent with procedures in 44 CFR Part 25, the United States will t
adequate measures to ensure that relocating residents of Mill Creek
relocate in areas which do not pose a significant risk to public healt
It is anticipated that exposure to arsenic and heavy metals at the
relocation sites will be reduced to levels at or near backcround, maki
Alternative No.1 the remedial action alternative with the lowest risk
usinl the health risk assumptions presented in the Endangerment Assess
Baving both the lowest risk and lowest cost (51,700,000 total present
based on market value), relocation of all residents is clearly the mas
cost-effective alternative. In addition, because AMC has aquired all
residences, approximately 5300,000 is necessary to complete the remedy
The alternative would also have minimal environmental impacts and waul
be consistant with any final remedial action.
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
0&" requirements for the selected alternative would be simple and
infre~uent, involving maintenance of fencing and warning signs around
site boundary. Labor requirements for fence and sign maintenance waul
minimal as would materials for repair. The reliability of site
stabilization of areas disturbed during demolition activities would be
dependent on the successful establishment of vegetation on these areas
Certain areas may have levels of contaminants present that would be
phytotoxic. It is anticipated, however, that most disturbed areas ca~
temporarily revegetated, although soil amendments may be necessary. 1
amount of barren so11 remaining in Hill Creek after temporary site
stabilization activities would be minor compared to adjacent areas on
Smelter Bill.
-51-
-------
Operatin, and maintenance costs include maintenance of the ve,etative cover
used to stabiliz~ the topsoil cap and maintenance of the fences around the
perimeter of the area. An allovance of 535,000 per year was made to cover
this cost.
.
ADDITIONAL DATA REQUIREMENT
The State of Montana 1987 Le,islature enacted le,islation fundin, for a
state match; a portion of interest money from the resource indemnity trust
fund. This le,islation also authorized the State to use this interest
money to offer (underwrite) bonds to ~rovide increased fundin, for a State
match, as necessary.
The Montana Department of Health
State Agency responsible for O&H
para,raph).
and Environmental Sciences (MDHES) 1s the
activities and fundin, (see above
SCHEDULE
Activity
Date
...........
Start Enforcement Negotiations
RA Signs Record of Decision (ROD)
Complete Enforcement Negotiationsa
Begin Remedial Actionb
Complete Remedial Action
Sep. 3, 1987
Oct. 2, 1987
Dec. 30, 1987
Jan. 30, 1987
Dec. 30, 1988
a This ti.. frame is the maximum statutory time frame in
sub..ction 122 (e) of CERCLA. The Anaconda Company (AMC) has
alr.ady reached agreement vith all except eight families to
peraanently relocate. Therefore, negotiations should be
complete.
b EPA Region VIII preferred alternative, permanent relocation,
has already been init\ated by AMC. AMC has undertaken this
initiative at its ovn risk. This date reflects furth€l efforts
-52-
-------
needed to complete the remedy. EPA Region VItI preferred
alternative also included stabilization of contaminated soils
and fencing to restrict access.
FUTURE ACTIONS
The community of Mill Creek is included as an operable unit, under the
on-Ioinl Anaconda Smelter site RI/FS. Therefore, remedial actions
recommended for Mill Creek must be consistent with potential actions for
the smelter site. The 160-acre community of Mill Creek vill be included
under future actions taken on the smelter site.
-53-
-------
EXHIBIT 3
Remedial Action Plan
Mill Creek, Montana
I.
General
The Defendant shall implement a program to temporarily
stabilize vacated areas of the community of Mill Creek as
residents are relocated.
The temporary stabilization
requirements are intended to provide temporary protection of
public health and the environment pending completion of a
Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study ("RI/FS") for a
later operable unit for regional soil contamination around
the Anaconda Smelter complex (including the area of Mill
Creek, r~ontana) and selection of a final remedial action.
In
conducting the temporary site stabilization, the D@fendant
-
shall comply with the requirements of section II of the
Remedial Action Plan set forth below.
II.
Temporary Site Stabilization Program
A.
As title to property is transferred to the Defendant by
the residents of Mill Creek or the State, homes and associated
buildings shall be demolished on the property and driveway
asphalt pavement shall be rendered unsuitable for recreational
bicycling, skateboards, etc., through pitting or other means
of roughening the surface.
For properties acquired from
residents by the Defendant, this shall be accomplished with,n
fourteen (14) calendar days of cessation of utility service
to the acquired residence or as quickly as practicable during
the non-construction season (November 1 to April 30).
-------
i i
When title to property is transferred to the Defendant by
the State, demolition of buildings shall be completed within
fourteen (14) calendar days of the transfer or as quickly as
practicable during the non-construction season.
Notwithstanding the above schedule, the Defendant shall not
initiate demolition or site stabilization activities until
the historic preservation procedures in subparagraph III.A.I.
of this Exhibit have been completed.
If such procedures are
completed after the deadlines specified immediately above,
the demolition activities must be completed within fourteen
(14) calendar days of completion of the historic preservation
or as quickly as practicable during the non-construction
season.
Demolition debris from the demolished buildings
shall_be consolidated with demolition debris on the Smelter
Hill remaining from demolition of the Anaconda Smelter and
covered with a temporary cover within fourteen (14) calendar
days of completion of demolition.
The Defendant shall
exped,tiously grade the site(s) of demolished residences and
associated buildings to natural contours and establish and
maintain a vegetative cover.
More specific requirements are
included below.
Compli~nce With Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate
Federal and State Requirements
As the Defendant conducts the demolition and temporarj
B.
site stabilization program, the Defendant shall comply with
the "applicable or relevant and appropriate" Federal and
State requirements as set forth below.
-------
i i i
1 .
Federal Requirements Regarding Archaeological and
Historic Preservation
(Archaeological and Historic Preservation Act (16 U.S.C.
section 469, 40 C.F.R. section 6.301(b)), and National
Historic Preservation Act (16 U.S.C. section 470;
40 C.F.R. section 6.301(b); and 36 C.F.R. Part 800.))
a.
The State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO)
has been consulted with respect to historic and archaeological
resources in Mill Creek~ Montana.
conducted for planning purposes.
A field investigation was
The SHPO has concluded that
Mill Creek does not constitute a historic district, and that
prehistoric remains'are probably not present in the area.
Therefore, the activities outlined here are focused upon
individual structures in the community which may meet the
National Register Criteria (36 C.F.R. Part 60.4).
b.
The Defendant shall conduct an intensive
inventory of properties for structures which predate World
War II.
This inventory shall be conducted prior to any
demolition of Mill Creek homes.
A qualified historian shall
gather information necessary to complete a Montana Historical
and Architectural Inventory form for structures predating
World War II.
If the Defendant or its consultant cannot
obtain access from a Mill Creek residential homeowner, EPA
will assist the Defendant in gaining access consistent with
paragraph IX.B. of the main text of this Partial Consent
Decree.
The information gathered concerning these structures
shall be compiled into a historical and architectural inventory
report and shall be submitted to EPA (Montana Office) with,n
-------
iv
60 days of the date of entry of this Partial Consent Decree
or access to property, whichever is later.
c.
Following a finding by EPA and the SHPO, in
relation to the criteria for listing in the National Register
of Historic Places, if a structure is found to be not eligible
for nomination into the National Register of Historic Places,
no further action is necessary.
The Defendant shall proceed
with demolition.of all buildings on acquired properties within
fourteen (14) calendar days of cessation of utility s2rvice
to the acquired residence or as quickly as practicable
following c~ssation of utility service during the non-
construction season.
d.
If structures are found by EPA and the SHPO to
be eli9ible for the National Register of Historic Places,
then the effects of the proposed house demolition shall be
determined by EPA and the SHPO using the criteria of effect
(section 800.9(a)) and the criteria of adverse effect (section
800.9(b)).
If a finding of adverse effect is made, EPA shall
consult with the SHPO and the Advisory Council on Historic
Preservation to determine an appropriate approach to mitigate
the effects of the Mill Creek demolition.
Upon approval of a
Memorandum of Agreement including mitigation matters by the
Advisory Council, the Memorandum of Agreement shall be
incorporated into this Partial Consent Decree as an enforceable
part thereof, and the Defendant shall comply with the
mitigation measures set forth therein.
-------
v
2.
Federal and State Requirements Regarding Air
Resources
The Defendant shall comply with primary and secondary
national ambient air quality standards for total suspended
particulates and lead (40 C.F.R. Part 50) and Montana's Air
Quality Bureau's requirements for particulate matter and
constr~ction/demolition sites (ARM sections 16.8.821 and
16.8.1401(3) and (4)).
The Defendant shall comply with the
health-based performance goals for both arsenic and cadmium
referenced on page 48 of the Mill Creek ROD, as explained
below.
The purpose of the health-based performance goals is to
ensure that remedial activities, specifically, demolition
and temporary site stabilization activities, do not cause
excessive ambient concentrations of arsenic and cadmium over
the s h 0 rt term.
The health-based performance goals- .:10 not
apply to emissions primarily originating outside the boundaries
of Mill Creek or to emissions originating within Mill Creek
from areas not directly affected by demolition and temporary
site stabilization.
EPA shall bear the burden of proving
that concentrations of arsenic and cadmium above the health-
based performance goals were caused primarily by remedial
activities in Mill Creek.
Compliance with the health-based
performance goals shall be measured at the stationary ambient
air quality monitoring station located in Mill Creek Park in
the community of Mill Creek.
In order to document
noncompliance with the health-based performance goals and
-------
vi
this Partial Consent Decree, the United States must demonstrate
the following:
1.
The 24-hour total concentration of cadmium
exceeded 0.019 ug/m3 or the total concentration of arsenic
exceeded 0.5 ug/m3* as measured by the EPA approved monitoring
and analytical techniques currently used for the monitoring
station and
2.
Visible emissions of dust caused by demolition,
grading, or dumping activities in the absence of other upwind
visible sources were observed moving in the direction of the
monitoring station within the 24-hour averaging period showing
tne exceedance of the arsenic and cadmium.
The Montana Air Quality rules at ARM section 16.8.1401(4)
state that ~reasonable precautions" are to be employed to
control emissions of airborne particulate matter for all
demolition projects.
"Reasonable precautions" must also be
taken when using streets, roads, or parking lots under ARM
section 16.8.1401(3).
The rules define "reasonable
precautions" as follows:
"Reasonable precautions means any r~asonable measure to
control emissions of airborne particulate matter.
Determination of what is reasonable shall be accompllshed
on a case-by-case basis taking into account energy,
environmental, economic, and other costs."
*These numbers were established as a means of proving that an
exceedance of the health-based performance goals were caused
by demolition/site stabilization activities at Mill Creek.
Numbers less than this value represent the observed air
concentrations which occurred 99~ of the time in Mill
Creek during 1984 through 1986. Therefore, exceedances
above these levels would be abnormal for Mill Creek.
-------
vi 1
The following reasonable precautions apply to the Mill Creek
demolition.
Building Demolition
All houses and structures in Mill Creek must be wetted
with water inside and outside prior to building demolition.
At the time a structure is demolished, a dust-suppressing
.
mist shall be applied to control airborne particulates.
Roads and Work Areas
All haul roads shall be watered during the construction
season (May 1 to October 31) as often as necessary to prevent
excessive dust.
"Excessive dust" means airborne particulate
emissions which exceed 50 percent opacity for a perlod of
90 sec..onds.
When watering will not cause safety problems,
all work areas shall also be watered.
Transport of Demolition Debris
Demolition debris shall be wetted in the trucks prior to
leaving Mill Creek.
A 11 demo 1 it i on deb r i s s h all be h a u 1 e d to
the Smelter site where it will be consolidated with demolition
debris from the Smelter Complex located between the Anaconda
11 tailings pond and the slag plle.
Debri s shall be covered
with slag to prevent blowing dust pending final disposition
of demolition debris following the Smelter Hill RIfFS.
EPA has concluded that since the actions in this Remedial
Action Plan are of short and intermittent duration and are
intended to be interim. and since releases from these actions
are difficult to separate from releases from areas adjacent
-------
vii i
to Mill Creek, the required practices listed above, in
conjunction with the monitoring and compliance program, are
consistent with health-based performance goals, which otherwise
relate to long-term, area-wide averages.
3.
Floodplain and Wetland Management Requirements
(40 C.F.R. Part 6, Appendix A; 40 C.F.R. sections 6.302(a)
and (b); Executive Order 11990;. and Executive Order 11988).
Clean Water Act section 404 dredge and fill requirements
(40 C.F.R. Parts 230, 231, 33 C.F.R. Parts 323 and 330).
The community of Mill Creek is located within the 100-
year floodplain of the stream (Mill Creek).
Several of the
homes that will be demolished as part of the implementation
of the remedial action fall within the boundary of the riparian
woodland/shrubland vegetative type, which was determined by
EPA to be a wetland.
As such, several management practices
shall be utilized during the demolition activities.
Demolition
and site stabilization activities will be accomplished in
the following manner to minimize adverse effects to wetland
resources:
Demolition Activities
a.
Mechanized equipment shall be approprlately sized so as
to minimize effects to wetland areas.
The smallest
piece of equipment with the shortest turning radius
shall be utilized around structures where riparia~ trees
and shrubs may be adversely affected.
Whenever possible,
equipment shall work around the riparian vegetation
rather than destroy the veg~tation.
-------
ix
During demolition, equipment shall be transported via
existing roadways.
No new roadways will be constructed.
All equipment shall be kept out of the area within the
ordinary high water mark.
Under no circumstances shall
equipment be allowed to cross the stream or its banks.
All demolition debris shall be removed from the site
within fourteen (14) calendar days of the completion of
demolition of a residence acquired during the construction
season (May 1 to October 31).
Debris from residences
acquired in the non-construction season (November 1 to
April 30) shall be removed within thirty (30) calendar
days of the start of the next construction season.
Site Stabilization Activities
b.
Fallowing demolition of homes and removal of demolition
debris, foundations shall be collapsed and filled.
The
area shall be regraded and smoothed to conform to the
existing topography and to facilitate drainage.
The
area of regrading shall be minimized and shall include
only those areas directly affected by demolition
activities.
Materials which may be brought into the community for
the purposes of fill shall not be waste or contaminated
materials associated with the smelter.
F ill ma t e r 1 a 1
excavated from the current Smelter Hill borrow area may
be used, where the top 75 feet of cover has been removed,
provided EPA has been given 1Q days' notice prior to
removal in which to sample the soils to be used.
-------
x
Riparian vegetation which may have been rendered non-
viable during demolition activities shall be removed
and shall be replaced with like vegetation.
Defendant shall mulch disturbed areas with straw or hay
at the rate of approximately two (2) tons to the acre.
The mulch will be crimped into the graded surface to
reduce blowing dust and to promote revegetation.
Defendant will seed the mulched areas using a seed mix
of grasses consisting of Slender Wheatgrass, Streambank
Wheatgrass, and Canadian Bluejoint.
Seeding will be
conducted during the first growing season after an area
has been mulched.
The spring planting season is
considered to extend from May 1 to June 1.
The fall
planting season occurs from October 10 to October 31.
4.
Re~uirements Concerning Wildlife Resources
(Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 9 1531,
40 C.F.R. ~ 6.302(h), and 50 C.F.R. Part 402); and Fish
and Wildlife Coordination Act (16 U.S.C. 9 1531 and
40 C.F.R. 9 6.302(g).)
,
EPA has concluded informal
consultation per section 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species
Act, as amended, with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has concurred that the
proposed activities in Mill Creek, Montana, will not
adversely affect endangered species or their habitats.
Consultation concerning the effects and necessary
mitigation regarding wetlands and grading and filling
-------
xi
operations also satisfies the requirements of the Fish
and Wildlife Coordination Act.
5.
Requirements Concerning Aquatic Life
(Federal Water Quality Criteria (40 C.F.R. Part 131)
for surface water quality for aquatic life as set forth
on page 47 of the Mill Creek ROD.
The numerical criteria presented in the ROD shall
be more specifically applied according to the direction
provided in the Quality Criteria for Water (1986, EPA
440/5-86-001).
For arsenic, the criteria remains fixed
at 0.19 mg/l for a 4-day average.
The cadmium criteria
shall be 0.00066 mg/l at a hardness of 50, for a 4-day
average.
As hardness varies from this value, the
appropriate criteria shall be determined according to
the equation prescribed in the criteria document.
The
lead criteria shall be 0.0013 mg/l at a hardness of 50,
for a 4-day average.
As hardness varies from this
value, the appropriate criteria shall be determined
according to the equation prescribed in the criteria
document. The copper criteria shall be 0.0065 mg/l at a
hardness of 50, for a 4-day average.
As hardness varles
from this value, the appropriate criteria shall be
determined according to the equation prescribed in the
criteria document.
The zinc criterla shall be
0.059 mg/l at a hardness of 50, for a 4-day average.
As hardness varies from this value, the appropriate
criteria shall be determined according to the equation
-------
xii
prescribed in the criteria document (February 1987
Ambient Water Quality for Zinc, EPA 440/5-87-003).
a.
These criteria only apply to remedial activities
(demolition and temporary site stabilization)
conducted in Mill Creek and do not apply to releases
of hazardous substances originating outside of the
community of Mill Creek as noted on page A-9 of
Appendix D of the Mill Creek Feasibility Study.
Compliance with these criteria shall be evaluated
by utilizing a 4-day continuous average for chronic
toxicity to aquatic life as set forth in the EPA
Water Quality Criteria documents themselves.
The
average shall be calculated based on a minimum of
two grab samples of Mill Creek surface water per
day collected 4 hours apart at a location
approximately 60 feet from the downstream edge of
specific demolition/site stabilization activities
where activities will be conducted within 60 feet
of the stream.
b.
ARca shall collect a grab sampl e of Mi 11 Creek
surface water at the bridge carrying Highway 274
over the stream of Mill Creek on the southeast edge
of the community of Mill Creek on the morning that
demolition or other site stabilization work is
initiated at a residential site in Mill Creek and
for at least three mornings of consecutive working
days thereafter or until the demolition or site
-------
xii i
stabilization work ceases, whichever is later.
The
purpose of these samples shall be to establish
baseline conditions for waters as they enter the
community of Mill Creek.
The samples shall be
collected, handled, analyzed, and reported in a
manner consistent with this Partial Consent Decree.
Analytical results shall be reported to EPA and the
State not later than forty-five (45) calendar days
of the date upon which the last sample in a series
was collected.
c.
In order to document noncompliance with a
water quality criteria, the United States must
demonstrate the following:
1 .
The 4-day average concentration of one of
the criteria was exceeded at the downstream
monitoring point (a showing of no detectable
cadmium or lead using standard analytical
techniques shall be an adequate showlng of
compliance with criteria for those parameters),
,
and
2.
The four-day baseline average at the
Highway 274 bridge does not exceed the water
quality criteria for the parameter for which
exceedance(s) of the criteria at the downstream
monitoring point were detected, and
3.
A discharge or discharges of sediment
resulting from demolition or other site
-------
xiv
stabilization work conducted by the. Defendant
were observed at a time consistent with the
sampling at the downstream sampling point
showing exceedances of the criteria.
d.
EPA has concluded that complying with the
management practices specified concerning wetla~d
resources should prevent exceedances of these
water quality ~riteria.
Requirements Concerning Asbestos
6.
(40 C.F.R. Section 61.140, et seq.)
The Defendant shall comply with these requirements if
asbestos is encountered during demolition.
The Defendant
shall conduct pre-demolition inspections in order to ascertain
the p~esence of asbestos and prepare and submit reports to
EPA and the State documenting the results of the inspections.
These reports shall be submitted not later than fourteen
(14) calendar days following the inspection.
7.
Requirements Concerning Junk Vehicles
(-'Sections 75-10-504 and 522, MCA.)
The Defendant shall comply with these requirements.
8.
~uirements Concerning Occupational Health and
"Safety
(29 C.F.R. Part 1926 and 40 C.F.R. section 910.32)
The Defendant shall comply with these requirements.
Fencing Activities
B.
Defendant shall fence acquired property in Mill Creek to
secure the area from casual entry by the public.
Fencing
shall be conducted during the construction season (May 1 tJ
-------
xv
October 31).
The Defendant shall fence the contiguous portions
of the Mill Creek property currently owned by Defendant as
described in the map which is Exhibit 5 of this Partial
Consent Decree.
Fencing shall consist of six-strand high
tensile smooth wire.
When gates are installed. Defendant
shall provide a secure method to lock gates.
Adequate warning
signs shall be placed on the fence at all gates and at one
hundred (100) foot intervals with the followi~g warning:
"Danger. Contaminated Area--Unauthorized Personnel Keep
Out." Isolated small parcels of land owned by the Defendant
(1 acre or less) which are surrounded by property under
other ownership do not need to be fenced.
Fencing shall be
initiated and completed within thirty (30) calendar days
from t~e date of entry of this Partial Consent Decree if the
date of entry falls during the construction season.
If the
date of entry of this Partial Consent Decree falls during
the non-construction season. then fencing shall be initiated
and completed as weather permits but no later than thirty
(30) calendar days after the start of the next construction
season.
As additional contiguous properties are acquired
from the residents by the Defendant. the United States or
the State. they shall be fenced within fourteen (14) calendar
days of the date when the property is vacated by the residents
during the construction season.
During the non-construction
.
season. fencing shall be completed as soon as weather permits
after the property is vacated but no later than fourteen
-------
xvi
(14) calendar days after the start of the next construction
season.
C .
Maintenance
The Defendant shall maintain the temporary cover over
the demolition debris, the temporary vegetative cover, and
the security fence until such time as EPA, in consultation
with the State, completes the final remedial action for Mill
Creek under subsequent operable units of the Anaconda Smelter
Superfund site.
Maintenance shall include monthly inspection
and any necessary repairs to the fencing, temporary vegetative
cover, and debris disposal site cover.
I I I .
REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
The Defendant shall submit monthly progress reports t~
EPA and the State not later than seven (7) calendar days
from the end of a calendar month documenting the Defendant1s
progress in complying with the requirements of this Remedial
Action Plan.
These reports shall address the permanent
relocation program and the temporary site stabilization
program, including operation and maintenance activities.
The reports shall describe proposed activities for the upcoming
month and the findings of the maintenance inspection.
The
monthly progress reports do not need to include other plans,
reports, or other documents submitted to EPA and/or FEMA
pursuant to this Partial Consent Decree if they are clearly
referenced in the monthly report.
-------
EXHIBIT 4
Cooperative Agreement
Agency (FEMA) and the
Implementation of the
Montana.
Between the Federal Emergency Management
State of Montana (State) for the
Permanent Relocation program at Mill Creek,
A. Authoritv. This Cooperative Agreement is executed pursuant
to the authority of the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended, Executive
Order 12580, and the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real
Property Acquisi~ion Policies Act of 1970, as amended.
B. PurDose. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), in.
conjunction with the State, has selected a remedial clean up
remedy at Mill Creek, Montana due to hazardous material
contamination in the soil, drinking water, and household dust of
the community. As a part of this clean up action, EPA and the
state have determined the need for providing permanent relocation
to all the residents of Mill Creek.
The State of Montana and the Federal Emergency Management Agency
recognize the importance of making this relocation activity a
~cooperative undertaking. It is mutually recognized and ag~eed
~hat this Cooperative Agreement is an attachment to the Partial
Consent Decree which will be filed in United States of America
and State of Montana v. Atlantic Richfield Co., Civil Action
No. , and the effectiveness of this Cooperative
Agreement depends upon the execution of the Partial Consent
Decree by the parties to it. If it is determined that ARca will
not take title to property acquired in Mill Creek pursuant to the
Partial Consent Decree or its attachments, then the portion of
this Cooperative Agreement which reflect a willingness by the
State to accept title to acquired property prior to conveying
such title to ARca will have no effect and will be void.
C. Duties.
(1)
FEMA
ww.:
a.
in carrying
Agreement.
arrangement
Cooperative
Pay for 90% of the expenses incurred by the parties
out actions taken pursuant to this Cooperative
The 90%-(Federal)-10% (State) cost sharing
applies to all actions taken pursuant to this
Agreement unless otherwise specified herein.
b. Provide the State detailed documentation of its costs
Jnd work and those of its agents within 30 days of the completion
f each quarter.
-------
c. Take all actions necessary to accomplish the
acquisition of marketable title for any real property which may
have to be purchased pursuant to this Cooperative Agreement.
Acquisition of marketable title action shall include, but not be
limited to:
(1) Determining the nature of the privately-owned
real property interests in the project and the identity of the
owners of those interest:
(2) Appraising the fair market value of those
interests described in paragraph (1) of this section. This
appraisal shall disregard any decreases in the fair market value
of the properties caused by EPA's having listed Mill Creek,
Montana on the National Priorities List.
(3) Reviewing all titles, title insurance
commitments, deeds and other documents regarding the conveyance
of real property interests in the project prior to the purchase
of such real property interests by FEMA:
(4) Negotiating with the seller to resolve any
problems relating to title indicated by the title commitment
report or any other information so that marketable title is
conveyed by way of a general warranty deed accompanied by c
insurance policy which insures such marketable title:
title
(5) Offering to each owner of a real property
interest described in paragraph (1) of this section, the
appropriate purchase price as determined in paragraph (2) of thlS
section and negotiating the sale of that real property interest:
(6) In regard to all of the above referenced
conveyances, preparing the necessary documents for closing,
including, but not limited to, sales contracts, and deeds:
(7) Presenting to the State before conveyance of
marketable title, the contract for sale, the general warranty
deed, and the title insurance commitment and policy for approval
by the State as to whether they are in proper legal form and
whether they adequately convey the quality of title according to
the terms of this Cooperative Agreement.
d. Take all actions necessary to accomplish the
relocation of the owners and/or occupants of purchased property
pursuant to the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property
Acquisition Policies Act 1970, ~ amended, and that law's
implementing regulations.
e. Exercise the power of eminent domain pursuant to
section 104(j) of CERCLA, as amended, when necessary to acquire
privately owned real property in Mill Creek. However, FEMA only
agrees to assume such responsibility if:
-------
(1) at the time the power of eminent domain has to be
used, the state has not yet obtained such authority pursuant to
the State's commitment in paragraph C(2) (d) of this Cooperative
Agreement, and
(2) at the time the power of eminent domain has to be
used, the state has become able to provide FEMA with an assurance
pursuant to section 104(j) (2) of CERCLA, ~ amended, that it can
and will accept a transfer of whatever interests in real property
FEMA may have acquired by condemnation pursuant to section
l04(j) (1) of CERCLA, ~ amended.
(2)
The State Will:
a. Pay for 10% of all expenses incurred in carrying
out the actions to be taken pursuant to the Cooperative
Agreement.
(1) The 90% (Federal)-lO% (State) cost sharing
arrangement applies to all actions taken pursuant to this
Cooperative Agreement unless otherwise specified herein.
(2) The State's 10% cost share can be made in
whole or in part by using the State's direct matching
contributions as defined in FEMA's Superfund Cost Share
~ligibility Criteria for Permanent and Temporary Relocation, 44
CFR Part 222.
(3) To satisfy its 10% share of the cost, the
State shall perform as follows:
(a) Within 30 days of FEMA's detercminations
of anticipated expenditures for each quarter, the State will
provide FEMA with 10% of the amount so anticipated.
(b) To the extent that the State anticipates
that it will satisfy its cost share for any quarter by matching
contribution, the State will document to FEMA the State's
anticipated matching contributions for the quarter and the
anticipated costs relating to those matching contributions.
(c)
In the event that:
(i) FEMA does not allow all or part of
the matching contribution claimed by the State or,
(ii) The State's matching contribution
does not equal 10% of the total costs of carrying out the FEMA
and State responsibilities under this Cooperative Agreement for a
~iven quarter, then the State will be billed for the difference
~etween its matching contribution and its 10% cost share at the
end of the quarter and shall pay such bill by check within 60
days.
-------
(d) In the event that the State's
contribution for a given quarter exceeds 10% of the total costs
of carrying out ~he FEMA and state responsibilities under this
Cooperative Agreement for such quarter, the excess contribution
may be applied towards any future cost share requirements under
this Cooperative Agreement. However, in no event will FEMA make
any direct payments to the state.
(e) The State shall submit detailed
documentation of the costs of its matching contributions within
30 days of the completion of each quarter.
(4) It is mutually recognized by FEMA and the State
that the Partial Consent Decree to which this Cooperative
Agreement is an attachment contemplates ARCO's reimbursing the
United States all of the United State's costs of conducting a
permanent relocation program at Mill Creek. However, in the
unlikely event that federal and/or state funds must be used in
the course of the Mill Creek permanent relocation program, the
following applies: Within 90 days of final payment for purchase
of property or for relocation assistance on properties purchased
pursuant to this Cooperative Agrement, whichever is later, FEMA
will determine the total costs of actions taken under this
Cooperative Agreement which are subject to cost sharing and the
dollar amount of the State's 10% cost share. If the Stat~'s
matching contribution falls short of the amount owed for its cost
share, the State will pay the amount billed within 60 days of
receiving such bill. If the State's matching contribution
exceeds the amount owed for its cost share, the State may use
such excess to reduce its cost share at other facilities in the
State which are-listed on the National Priorities List
established under CERCLA, as amended. However, in no event will
FEMA make any direct payments to the State.
b. Pursuant to section 104(j) (2) of CERCLA, ~ amended,
take marketable title to all real property acquired by the United
States pursuant to the Partial Consent Decree in the litigation
entitled U.s. et al v. A nt'c 'c 'e d , sucra, to
which this Cooperative Agreement is an attachment at the time of
settlement. Any deed between the United States and the State in
this context will state that the conveyance is pursuant to the
terms of the Partial Consent Decree in the litigation entitled
u.S. et al v. t a tic ic 'eld om an , sucra, to which this
Cooperative Agreement is an attachment and will reference its
filing with the county recorder of deeds.
c. Review all titles, title insurance commitments, deeds
and all other documents regarding the conveyance of real property
interests in the project prior to the purchase of such real
property interests by the United States.
d. Use its best efforts to obtain as expeditiously as
possible statutory authority to exercise the power of eminent
domain for use in remedial actions under CERCLA, ~ amend~.
If
-------
~t becomes necessary to exercise the power of eminent domain at
Mill Creek pursuant to this Cooperative Agreement, and if the
state has obtained such authority by the time the Dower of
eminent domain must be used, then the State agrees. that it will
be responsible for exercising such authority at Mill Creek.
e. Use its best efforts to obtain as expeditiously as
possible statutory authority to enable the State to accept
transfers of interests in real property which the United States
might acquire by condemnation pursuant to section l04(j) (1) of
CERCLA, ~ amended, notwithstanding the mandates of section 77-1-
211(2) of the Montana Code.
f. Coordinate as neceseary with and among appropriate
units of local government.
g. Properly file this Cooperative Agreement with the
County Recorder of Deer Lodge County Montana within 14 days of
the execution of the agreement.
h. Upon receipt of reasonable notice, allow EPA and FEMA
access to real property purchased pursuant to this Cooperative
Agreement after the State has received title to such property.
~uch access will be for purpose of carrying out CERCLA actjvities
In Mill Creek.
D.
.
Proiect Officials and Roles.
(1) The Proiect Manaaer (PM) is designated by the State and
shall be the principal State official involved in the project.
The PM is responsible for assuring State compliance with
responsibilities as outlined in this Cooperative Agreement.
His/her primary contact with the Federal Government is the FEMA
Project Officer.
(2) The ~ (PO) as designated by FEMA is the
point of contact for the State. The PO shall be responsible for
assuring FEMA compliance with responsibilities as outlined in
this Cooperative Agreement.
(3) The lEMA Assistance Officer (AO) shall exercise final
authority to issue changes to the agreement on behalf of FEMA, to
obligate the Federal Government to the terms described herein,
and to administer the terms of the Cooperative Agreement.
(4) ~. The PO does not have the authority to
alter any obligations under this agreement. Be is not authorized
10 make any representations or commitments of any kind on behalf
f the AO or the United States or any of its agencies. Any
circumstances which may arise requiring a change in the terms of
this Cooperative Agreement shall be referred to the AO by the PO
with analysis and recommendations. The AO shall retain final
authority to adopt any changes to the Cooperative Agreement on
behalf of FEMA.
-------
(5 )
Identification:
The Project Manager is:
Name:
Telephone:
Address:
The Project Officer is:
Name: Charles D. Robinson
Telephone: (202) 646-3805
Address: FEMA Headquarters
500 C Street, SW
Washington, DC 20472
Name: Joe D. Winkle
Telephone: (202) 646-3615
Address: FEMA Headquarters
500 C Street, SW
washington, DC 20472
The Assistance Officer is:
E.
Cost Recoverv.
(1) The execution of this Cooperative Agreement does not
create an agency relationship between FEMA and the State.
(2) FEMA and the State agree that, with respect to the
claims which each may be entitled to assert against any third
'person (herein referred to the as the ftpotentially responsible
partyft, whether one or more) for reimbursement of any services,
materials, monies or other thing of value expended by FEMA or the
State for remedial activity at Mill Creek neither FEMA nor the
State will enter into a settlement with or initiate a judicial or
administrative proceeding against a potentially responsible party
for the recovery of such sums except after having given notice in
writing to the other party to the Cooperative Agreement no less
than thirty (30) days in advance of the date of the proposed
settlement or commencement of the proposed judicial or
administrative proceedings. Neither party to this Cooperative
Agreement shall attempt to negotiate for or collect reimbursement
of any remedial costs on behalf of the other party, and authority
to do 50 is hereby ex~ressly negated and denied.
(3) FEMA and State agree to cooperative and coordinate in
efforts to recover their respective costs of remedial actions
taken at the site described herein, including the negotiation of
settlement and the filing and management of any judicial actions
against potentially responsible parties. This shall include
coordination in the use of evidence and witnesses available to
each in the preparation and presentation of any cost recovery
action, excepting any documents or information which may be
confidential under the provisions of any applicable State or
Federal law or regulation.
-------
(4) FEMA and the State agree that judicial action taken by
either party against a potentially responsible party for recovery
of any sums expended in remedial actions under the Cooperative
Agreement shall be filed in the United States District Court for
the judicial district in which the site is located, or in such
other United States District Courts as may be authorized by Sec.
113 of CERCLA, and agreed to in writing by FEMA and the State.
F.
Information On The Site.
(1) At FEMA's request, the State shall make available any
information in its possession concerning the site, pursuant to
State law. If said information was submitted by or to the State
under a claim of confidentiality, said information will be
treated accordingly. Absent such a claim, FEMA may make said
information available to the public without further notice.
(2) At the State's request, FEMA shall make available any
information and reports developed as part of its responsibilities
under this Cooperative Agreement. The State agrees not to
release any information to the public which FEMA has claimed as
confidential and which potentially affects present or planned
enforcement actions, unless the State notifies FEMA and FEMA has
approved of such release.
t.
Third Parties
(1) This Cooperative Agreement is intended to benefit only
the state and FEMA. It extends no benefit or right to any third
party.
(2) FEMA does not assume any liability to third persons with
respect to losses due to bodily injury or property damages that
exceed the limitations contained in the provisions of 28 U.S.C.
Sec. l346(b). The State does not assume liability to FEMA or to
any third person with respect to losses due to bodily injury or
property damages or with respect to losses due to the enforcement
of environmental statutes.
(3) FEMA and the State agree to notify the other party
within 10 days of receipt of services of any action filed by a
third party(ies) against either FEMA or the State, its employees
or agents, as a result of work attempted or accomplished pursuant
to the terms of this Cooperative Agreement.
(4) The State and FEMA may perform their duties under this
Cooperative Agreement, with their own personnel and equipment or
by contracting for the services of other governmental agencies,
.ndividuals, or private entitles.
-------
EXHIBIT 5
.............
ex.IST/NG 4 STRAND
BARBED WIRE
............. NEW 6 S T RAN D
SMOOTH WIRE
Shelter
Site
..
..
...
..
..
.
.......IIIt..
..
..
..
..
,
HeGY.,
Willow.
o
o
.00....
2Il1O-
-------
permanent remedy, additional testing vill be necessary to satisfy
requirements concerning alternat~ve treatment technologies.
Comoliance vith Other Environmental Lavs
Subsection 121(d)(2) of CERCLA and 40 C.F.R. Section 300.68(i) together
require that the lead agency select a cost-effective remedy that
effectively mitigates and minimizes threats to and that provides adequate
protection of public health, velfare, and the environment. Except as
provided in Subsection 121(d)(4) of CERCLA, this requires selection of a
remedy that attains or exceeds applicable or relevant and appropriate
federal public health and environmental requirements identified for each
specific site.
A comprehensive analysis of Federal and State AlARs has been conducted to
identify and evaluate ARARs for all remedial alternatives considered in the
Mill Creek RI/FS. It is an attachment to the Feasibility Study report.
The identification of ARARs in the ARARs analysis was developed for
purposes of conducting an RI/FS. The following discussion selects the
AlARs that apply only to the selected alternative of permanent relocation
and temporary site stabilization. AlARs associated with a permanent remedy
vill be selected in future operable unit decision selecting a final,
permanent remedy. If EPA determines that relocation assistance should be
handled by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the action vould
follow the rules pursuant to the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real
Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (44 CFR Part 25).
Federal AlARs
o
Primary and Secondary National Ambient Air Ouality Standards for
respirable particulate and lead (40 CFR Part 50).
o
Montanas Air Oua1ity Bureau's requirements for particulate matter
and construction/demolition sites (ARM Sections 16.8.821 and
16.8.1401(3) and (4».
-46-
-------
RECORD OF DECISION
MILL CREEK, MONTANA
ANACONDA SMELTER
SUPERFUND SITE
FIRST OPERABLE UNIT
OCTOBER 1987
Prepared by:
U.S. EPA
Region VIII
Montana Office
ItA
EPAO
-------
TABLE
-
LIST OF TABLES
1
2
3
Inventory of Soils Studies for the Mill Creek Study Area ..
Comparison of Metals Concentrations in Surficial Soils
at Mill Creek with Other Nearby Communities ...............
Concentrations of Arsenic, Cadmium, and Lead (mg/kg)
For all Hill Creek Soil Profiles by Depth Increment .......
Hill Creek Yell Vater Analyses ............................
Arithmetic Average and Geometric Mean Concentrations of
Total Suspended Par~iculates, Arsenic, Cadmium, and Lead
a t Mill Creek (ug/m .) ....................................
Hean Concentrations and Range of Trace Elements in
Residential dust and indoor air.
Detailed Analysis Summary.................................
SUllmary of Cost Analyses...............~..................
4
5
6
7
8
IV
PAGE
19
20
24
26
29
30
40
43
-------
FIGl~E
LIST OF FIGURES
1
2
3
Location of Hill Creek and Surrounding Communities """'"
Subdivision of Lots 1n the Community of Hill Creek, Ht .....
Location of Anaconda Smelter Facilities in Relation
to Hill Creek..............................................
Surface Soil Arsen1c Distribut10n ..........................
Surface Soil Cadmium Distribution ..........................
Surface Soil Lead Distribution .............................
Locations of Surface Yater, Ground Yater, and Air Monitoring
Stations in the Mill Creek Study Area ......................
Summary of Remedial Action Alternatives ....................
Potential Failure Ranking Matrix ...........................
4
5
6
7
8
9
III
PAGE
8
10
11
21
22
23
28
38
41
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION
1.0 OVERVIEV
II.... 'I...........""[[[
1.1 Remedial Alternatives ....................................
1.2 Public Reaction to the Preferred Alternatives ............
2.0 BACKGROUND ON COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT ...........................
2.1 The Community Relations Program at the Mill Creek Operable
Un! t of the Anaconda Si te ""'I"."".""".."""""""""""".""""""
2.2 Summary of Major Comments Received and EPA's Respnses
During the Preparation of the Remedial Investigation and
Feasibili ty Study (RI/FS) ................................
3.0 SUMMARY OF PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THE RI/FS AND ENDANGERMENT
ASSESSMENT AND AGENCY RESPONSES ...............................
3. 1 Endangermen t Assesslften t ......................................... II 'I .. II II II II .. II II .. II II
3.. 1. 1 11 sk Assessmen t II II II .. II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II .. II II II II .. II II .. II II .. II II II II
3.1.2 ToxicololY II II II II II II II II .. .. .. II II II .. II II II II II II II II II II II .. II II II II II II II II II .. II II .
3 .. 1. 3 Exposure.... II II II II II II .. II .. II II II II .. II II II .. .. II .. II II II II II II II .. II II .. .. II II II .. II .. ..
3 II 2 Legal Issues II...... II . .. II II II II II II II .. II .. . II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II
3.2.1 Endangerment Assessment...........................
3.2.2 Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate State and
Federal Requirements (ARARs) ......................
3.2.3 General Comments Concerning the Mill Creek Draft
Feasibility Study, Supplemental Legal Concerns ....
3.3 Communi ty Concerns.. II II II II .. II . .. . .. II .. II .. II . II II II .. II .. II II .. II II .. .. II II II II II II II .. II
3.4 Policy Issues ............................................
3.5 Technical Issues.........................................
4.0 HEALTH ASSESSMENT.............................................
5.0 REMAINING CONCERNS............................................
APPENDICES
A - LIST 0' COMMUNITY RELATIONS ACTIVITIES CONDUCTED AT THE SITE PRIOR TO
AND DURING THE PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD
B - LIST 0' COMMENTORS
PAGE
1-1
1-1
1-2
2-0
2-1
2-2
3-1
3-2
3-2
3-7
-------
ATTACHHENT 1
RESPONSIVENESS SUHHARY
HILL CREEK OPERABLE UNIT
ANACONDA SHELTER SITE
ANACONDA, HONTANA
October 2, 1987
-------
1.0
OVERVIEV
This Respons1veness Summary for the Hill Creek Operable Unit of the
Anaconda Smelter Site ~as prepared to document and respond to the lssues
and comments raised by the public regarding act1v1ties of the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Anaconda H1nera1s Company (AHC)
at the smelter site. AHC 1S an operating unit of Atlantic R1chfield
Company (ARCO) and has responsibility ~ithin ARCO for managing the Anaconda
smelter properties. In the State of Hontana, this operat1ng unit is
commonly refered to as "Anacondah or AHC. Ho~ever. because AHC 1S legally
a part of ARCO, all further references 1n the Responsiveness Summary ~111
be noted as ARCO.
EPA prepared an Endangerment Assessmenr (EA) for Hill Creek and ARCO
conducted and prepared a Remed1al Invest1gat1on and Feasibility Study
(RIfFS) to determ1ne the health risks present to residents from
concentrat10ns of arsen1C and other heavy metals that have resulted from
historic smelter activities. A set of remedial alternatives that vould
protec~ the present and future public health and ~elfare of these residents
vas subsequently developed and made knovn to the public. These
alternatives and the pub11C reaction are summar1zed in th1S section.
1.1
REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES
The Agency (EPA) identif1ed th1rteen remedial alternat1ves in the draft FS
for the Hill Creek Operable Un1t. Among these alternatives:, f1ve involved
relocation of residents; four involved removal of contaminated soils; tvo
vould make use of s011 f111 and a sod cap to cover the contam1nated soil;
one called Common Response Actions ~ould requ1re paving of valk~ays and
driveways, replacement of vater supplies, house-cleaning, and replacement
of vater heaters; and lastly. a "no action" alternative meaning EPA vou1d
do nothing at the slte.
1-1
-------
Four of the th1rteen alternat1ves were ldent1f1ed as the lead1ng
alternat1ves. These alternat1ves were: relocat10n of all res1dents;
relocation of all res1dents and residents' houses; part1al relocat10n w1th
complete soil removal and on-S1te d1sposal; and partial relocation with
partial soil removal, on-s1te d1sposal, and part1al sOll t1ll. In order to
fulf1ll its primary objective, the protect10n of public health and welfare
of the current residents of Mill Creek, EPA's preferred alternatives
involved the relocation of all residents. Soil treatments and other such
issues would be considered in the Master RIfFS for the Anaconda Smelter
Site as part of the longer-term public health and environmental issues
remaining after resident relocation.
1.2
PUBLIC REACTION TO THE PREFERRED ALTERNATIVES
At the t1me of the publ1C comment period, Wh1Ch opened in December 1986
with the release of the draft FS and closed February 1987, permanent
relocation was identif1ed as the preferred alternative by EPA.
Subsequently, EPA has chosen relocat1on of all residents as the selected
alternative. It was judged as the most cost-effective and environmentally
preferred alternative that would provide for adequate protection of the
health of the current residents of M1ll Creek.
Publ1C reaction as recorded 1n written comments or v01ced at publ1C
meetings was m1xed. Atlantic R1chfield Company (ARCO) , the responsible
party, expressed, in several wr1tten documents, reservation at the
necessity of relocation based upon data and conclusions in the Endangerment
Assessment document. '
State and local agenc1es also responded to EPA's activ1ties. The
Anaconda-Deer Lodge County Comm1SS1on expressed a preference for voluntary
partial relocation and complete cleanup so that environmental factors would
not be an 1ssue 1n future land use decisions. The Montana Department of
Health and Environmental SCiences (MDHES) supported the selection of the
1-2
-------
four leading alternatives but did not put forth a favored alternative. In
principle, MDHES f~vors remedial actions that are final and lead to site
delisting. EPA received subsequent concurrence from MDHES vhen the
selected alternative vas chosen. Concurrence with the selected alternative
was a1so received from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).
EPA requested that the Agency for Toxic Substance and Disease Registry
(ATSDR) evaluate the RI/FS reports for the Mill Creek operable unit. ATSDR
stated that the selection of Alternative 1, Relocation of all Residents,
would maximally reduce all public health risks. Comments were submitted on
the information used to establish the risk at Mill Creek.
Residents of Mill Creek expressed their reactions to the Agency in various
ways; some commented individually, some through a law firm which
represented twenty-two residents, and some through a Mill Creek resident
who conducted an informal telephone survey. Resident reaction to
relocation was divided. About half were willing to move depending on the
settlement for their property. About a third expressed an unwillingness to
move under any conditions. Others favored soil removal and partial
relocation. Many residents expressed concern about the disruptive effect
site activities had on their personal lives and on the life of their
com~unity. Negative effects on property values and future health problems
were additional issues raised in reaction to the relocation alternatives.
1-3
-------
2.0
BACKGROUND ON COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
2.1
THE COMMUNITY RELATIONS PROGRAM AT THE MILL CREEK OPERABLE UNIT OF THE
ANACONDA SITE DURING THE PREPARATION OF THE RIfFS
EPA's activities at the H1II Creek Operable. Un1t began in late 1984 w1th
the completion of a preliminary Endangerment Assessment in October 1984.
In order to make information on the Operable Unit available to residents of
Hill Creek and to the general public, EPA established information
repositories at the Hearst Free Library and the Metcalf Senior C1tizens
Center in Anaconda, Montana where fact sheets and the project documents
vould be kept. EPA also provided for a resident Community Relations
Specialist to work with the community of Hill Creek, primarily to explain
RIfFS activities to the citizens and to obtain their input. In addition,
during the preparat10n of the RIfFS, EPA representatives met monthly w1th
H11l Creek residents and the H1ll Creek Residents' Assoc1at1on.
EPA also participated 1n local meet1ngs and held d1Scuss1ons w1th ARCO, the
gene~al publlC, and federal, state, and local agenc1es. In addition a
public meeting to discuss the results of the ur1nary arsenic study and a
public meet1ng on Superfund activit1es were conducted by EPA. All of the
above mentioned interested groups and entities were consulted in plann1ng
and conduct1ng the investigations and evaluat10ns for the RIfFS. All were
invited to attend monthly meetlngs of the Env1ronmental Advisory Committee
for the Anaconda Smelter site, vhere EPA presented and discussed
informat10n about the site and options for action. The Envlronmental
Advisory Committee included groups and agencies such as Clty and county
officials, local environmental groups, state off1cials and EPA
representatives. EPA prepared and d1stributed summaries of these meetings,
including EPA responses to issues raIsed by those who attended. EPA also
prepared and distributed six fact sheets w1th information directly relevant
to the Mill Creek Operable UnIt.
2-1
-------
2.2
SUMMARY OF MAJOR COMMUNITY CONCERNS AND EPA'S RESPONSE DURING THE
PREPARATION OF THE RIfFS
Major community concerns that were expressed about the Hill Creek Operable
Unit from October 1984 following the completion of the preliminary EA until
December 1986 when the RI/FS was released and the formal comment period
began can be grouped into five categories. There were questions and
concerns about: 1) the remedial alternatives, 2) health risks, 3) cost and
funding for cleanup, 4) loss of property values and sense of community, and
5) the Superfund process.
Remedial Alternatives
Concernc The Mill Creek Residents' Association expressed concern that the
lack of consensus in the community concerning relocation would negatively
effect EPA's decision-making policy and procedure. Residents felt that
individual needs would not be addressed in the selection of the remedial
alternatives due to this division.
Cleanup alternatives were viewed as not really feasible in the long-run
because of several reasons: wind erosion would cause recontamination from
contaminated areas outside the community, the size of the cleanup area, and
recontamination from property not undergoing cleanup within the community.
There were basic information requests concerning details of EPA's proposed
removal plan and the extent of soil cleanup necessary to adequately protect
children from exposure to contaminated soil.
Response: EPA addressed these concerns in monthly meetings with the Hill
Creek Residents' Association. A community relations specialist was
provided by EPA to provide current information on the EPA's activities and
decisions. EPA prepared and distributed question-answer fact sheets for
the residents of Hill Creek.
2-2
-------
Health Concerns
Concern: Community health concerns focus primatlly on the short- and
long-te~m effects of arsenic exposure on their health, especlally the
health of their children. In particular, they needed information on what
effects of arsenic EPA was studying, where arsenic accumulates ln the body
and what measures EPA had or was going to make ln order to reduce the
exposure to arsenic. Some residents asked about adult exposure to arsenic
and a rancher sited cattle death from arsenic poisoning and asked if humans
were also at risk. Questions were also raised about the health effects of
exposure to elevated concentrations of other metals (cadmlum and lead)
found at the Hill Creek site.
Concerns for pregnant women and other issues related to cancer incidents
were expressed.
Response:
concerns.
EPA implemented the followlng activities in response to these
o
families wlth children age six and under and other families who may
have been at rlsk from arsenic contamlnatlon were relocated pending
implementatlon of a permanent solutlon to the problem;
o
the Hill Creek RIfFS was expedited in order to develop an early
solution to the contamination problem;
o
the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) was asked to assist in
developing the initial study that revealed the hlgh arsenlC exposure
among the children of Hill Creek, and later to address specific
health concerns at two public meetings and with individuals in the
community;
o
ARCO was required to oil the dirt roads in Hill Creek to reduce
residents' exposure to alrborne arsenic-contamlnated road dust.
o
ARca was ordered to limit exposure to contaminatlon by covering flue
dust plIes, monltoring the effectiveness of the flue dust cover,
assurlng controls of dust during demolitlon at the smelter, and
postlng warning signs near areas contalnlng flue dust:
o
Mill Creek homes were provlded with thorough professional
house-cleanlng to reduce the lndoor exposure to arsenic; and
2-3
-------
o
Hill Creek families were informed about precautions they could take
to reduce theIr exposure to arsenIC.
Cost and Funding
Concern: Prior to October 1986 there was concern that funding for the
remedIal action at Hill Creek might not be available due to the delay in
the reauthorization of Superfund. Questions were asked about the amount of
money spent by EPA on the remedial planning efforts thus far and about who
would bare the ultimate cost responsibility for removal and relocation
activities.
Response: EPA officials assured residents that funding was available for
temporary relocation and for the expedited Hill Creek RIfFS and proceeded
on the assumption that Superfund would be reauthorized. Superfund was
reauthorized in October 1986.
Property Values and Stress
Concer~: Negative effects on property values resulting from EPA's
activities was a pressing concern for residents during remedial planning.
They requested that EPA provide full replacement value for their homes if
~ermanent relocation was selected. Residents who wanted to remain in Hill
Creek requested compensation for the devaluation of their property and some
residents were concerned about losing the right to compensation for
permanent relocation If they accepted temporary relocation.
Response: EPA responded to questions by stating compensation rules under
Superfund. Replacement value would be considered and moving costs are
often paid; however, EPA can not provide compensation for losses in market
value for residents who remain in Hill Creek nor compensation for stress.
Temporary relocatIon would not affect compensation for permanent
relocation.
2-4
-------
The Superfund Project Process
Concern: Residents expressed concern over the length of time that passed
before contamination was discovered at the Hill Creek site and the long
process to identify a satisfactory solution to the problem. Some residents
felt data were not always available.
Questions were raised about citizens input into the decision making
process, what factors are considered in selecting a preferred alternative,
separation of families, access to private property, and what recourse
residents might have to reject the selected alternative.
Response: EPA participated in meetings with residents at which these
concerns were raised. EPA solicited input from residents and assured them
it would be considered. Hovever, the protection of public health and
welfare would remain EPA's first priority.
Scientific study is often slov, but EPA attempted to expedite the RIfFS
process as much as possible and release data to the public when it was
finalized.
2-5
-------
3.0 SUHHARY OF PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THE RIfFS AND
ENDANGERMENT ASSESSMENT AND AGENCY RESPONSES
This section summarizes EPA's response to comments received during the
public comment period concerning the Hill Creek Operable Unit. Vritten
comments were received from ARCO in two documents: Comments on Hill Creek
RI/FS CERCLA Docket VIII 86-07, February 3, 1987 and Comments on
Endangerment Assessment: Hill Creek Hontana, Anaconda Smelter Site,
December 1, 1986, and in Attachment 3: Supplemental Legal Concerns,
February 4, 1987. Vritten and verbal comments were received from
individual citizens and their representatives. Comments were also received
from Hontana state and local agencies. ATSDR submitted comments on the
RI/FS as requested by EPA.
EPA has grouped these comments according to topical areas and has prepared
responses to them. The commentor is identified in parenthesis at the end
of each comment. A complete list of individual commentors is found in
Appendix B at the end of the Responsiveness Summary.
3-1
-------
3.1
ENDANGERMENT ASSESSMENT
Comments received by EPA on the Endangerment Assessment are grouped into
the topical areas of Risk Assessment, Toxicology, and Exposure and are
responded to by EPA in the following sections.
3.1.1
RISK ASSESSMENT
Uncertainties Inherent in Risk Assessment
1.
Comment: "...the EA failed to follow EPA guidelines (for the conduct
of risk/endangerment assessments)...(in its) neglect of uncertainties
in risk characterization... Given the high degree of uncertainty (in
the EA risk estimates), it could also be argued that the actual health
risks may be much lower than those estimated." (ARCO)
Response: The EA discussed the uncertainties associated with
estimating the exposure/risks to Hill Creek residents (e.g., bottom of
pp. 46,87). In addition, calculated risks to area residents were
described as "most probable" and "worst case" risk estimates, not as
absolute risks. The finalized PHE manual suggests that uncertainties
should be indicated in the risk assessment. Although the 1986 EA did
address uncertainties, a more detailed discussion of uncertainties has
been presented in the revised EA. Additionally, scientific
publications and reports dealing with the health effects of
contaminants, such as that issued by the Risk Assessment Forum of the
EPA, extensively discuss any uncertaintie, relevant to the issues.
2.
eo..ent: Risk assessment are always based on limited data,
assumptions, and models. The uncertainties inherent in this process
have not been addressed. (ARCO)
Response: Although the original EA addressed the specific
uncertainties associated with the assessment of risks in Hill Creek
3-2
-------
(see response to comment 1 above), a more detailed disCUSSIon of the
uncertainties inherent in the risk assessment process has been
provided in the revised EA. Again, it should be pointed out that
articles published 1n the scientific literature or produced by varIOUS
regulatory agencies commonly include discussions of scientific
uncertainty in order to place issues in perspective.
Studies on the Effects of Exposure
3.
Comment: "The EA failed to consider the fact that there appears to be
no observable adverse health effects to the residents of Hill Creek or
of other communities vith similar or even greater exposures to
arsenic."
(ARCO)
Response: The EA considered the evidence that exposures to
contaminants in Hill Creek have not been shovn to cause acute
toxicities (see p. 87, last paragraph). That has little relevance to
the carcinogenic risks being experienced by Hill Creek residents at
exposure levels too lov to cause acute, readily discernible
toxicities. It must be emphasized that the primary risks identified
at "111 Creek are to children vhose risks of cancer viII not become
apparent for many decades. The long latency of arsenic-induced skin
cancer, combined vith the relatively small population of Hill Creek,
vould make it difficult to discern a statistically valid change in the
number of cancers in Hill Creek residents. Noncarcinogenic health
effects viII also be difficult to identify because of the levels of
exposure and the small numbers of individuals involved.
4.
Co...nt: The Endangerment Assessment does not consider the Hontana
Air Pollution Study (July 1981) that demonstrates a high incidence of
respiratory disease (including cancer) and circulatory disease in the
study area. (Public)
3-3
-------
Response: The purpose of the EA is to assess risks associated vith
current or future use of a particular study area. The Hontana Air
Pollution Study addresses risks that occurred in the past, probably as
a result of the smelter operation. Because the smelter is currently
shut down and is unlikely to reopen, results obtained in the Hontana
Air Pollution Study are not directly applicable to current or future
exposure and were not considered in the EA.
Exposure to Other Environmental Agents
5.
Comment: "Incidence rates of lung cancer due to natural background
sources of exposure are much higher than arsenic and cadmium induced
rates in "ill Creek. According to EPA's radon report, certain regions
of western Montana are likely candidates for elevated radon levels.
The lung cancer mortality risks corresponding to these levels (200
picocuries per liter) range from 440-770 cases per 1000." [Average
radon levels (4 picocuries per liter) can pose risks ranging from
13-50 cases per 1000.J (ARCO)
Response: The existence of background risks to other causes was
irrelevant to the focus of the EA which was the calculation of risks
resulting from environmental contamination. The purpose of the EA vas
to assess the risks associated with contamination from specific
substances at "ill Creek, and to determine whether or not this
contamination poses an imminent and substantial endangerment to public
health, welfare, or the environment, irregardless of other non site-
related risks. If anything, lung cancer risks due to naturally
occurring radon would be additive to these caused by environmental
contaminants, making the lung cancer risks even higher than calculated
in the EA.
3-4
-------
Exposure to "Background" Levels of Contamination in Neighboring Tovns
6.
Comment: Additional perspective on the risk to
Creek would be provided by preparing worst-case
estimates of risk to residents in the reference
residents at Hill
and most probable
communities of
Livingston, Townsend, and Phillipsburg, Hontana.
(ARCO)
Response: The EA addressed the health risks to residents of Hill
Creek that result from the ARCO smelting activities. To compare those
estimates of risk to similar estimates for residents of reference
committees with uncertain environmental contamination would
be inappropriate.
Health Risks
7.
Comment: Vorst-case risk estimates are based on combining maximum
concentrations of contaminants in all media. As it seems extremely
unlikely that the same individual would be exposed to maximum
concentrations in several media, this approach may give unrealistic
estimates of human exposure. (ARCO)
Response: Although it is unlikely that anyone individual would
experience exposure to maximum concentrations of contaminants in the
various media, the EA presented the range of possible risks for
illustrative purposes. The worst-case or highest probable exposure is
used to provide an upper limit to the possible risks.
8.
COm88nt: The use of a time-weighted approach to estimating exposure,
vhich vould allow consideration of difference in contaminant
concentration between high use and low use areas, would have more
accurately reflected risks to Hill Creek residents. (ARCO)
Response: There are no data available to justify the use of the high
use and low use areas proposed by ARCO.
3-5
-------
9.
.
Comment: The Endangerment Assessment falls to demonstrate imminent
and substantial endangerment. (ARCO)
Response: Given the demonstration of high exposures of Hill Creek
residents to carcinogenic and toxic substances, the EA established an
imminent and substantial endangerment.
10.
Comment:
Risks to adults were not adequately addressed.
(Public)
Response: Risks to adults were considered in the EA,
children were emphasized because of the obligation to
sensitive population.
but the risks to
protect the most
11.
Comment: The risk assessment should not be based exclusively on
cancer risks, but should also emphasize other health risks. (Public)
Response: The EA emphasized cancer risks because they were the risks
of greater concern. However, other health risks have been more fully
developed in the revised EA.
Comparison of Concentrations of Contaminants to Applicable or Relevant and
Appropriate Requirements (AlARs)
12.
Comment: "...the EA failed to follow EPA guidelines (for the conduct
of risk/endangerment assessment)...(in its)...failure to compare media
concentrations with requirements, standards and criteria." (ARCO)
Consideration of ARARs is central to the baseline public health
evaluation at Superfund sites, and, therefore, they should be
considered for the Hill Creek assessment. (ARCO)
Response: Evaluation and Identification of "Applicable or Relevant
and Appropriate" Federal and State Requirements for Hill Creek,
3-6
-------
Hontana, CERCLA Site has been prepar~d by the EPA and referenced in
the revised EA.
13.
Comment: The ambient water quality criteria for arsenic (EPA 1980) is
not an ARAR for ground water. (ARCO)
Response: The identification of the drinking water ARAR for arsenic
(water quality criteria vs. HCL) has been deferred to a later operable
unit. See "Evaluation and Identification of "Applicable or Relevant
and Appropriate" Federal and State Requi~ements for Hill Creek,
Hon tana , CERCLA Site".
15.
Comment:
The HCLs are ARARs for drinking water.
Response: As stated in the review of ARARs for Hill Creek
(WEvaluation and Identification of "Applicable or Relevant and
Appropriate" Federal and State Requirements for Hill Creek, Hontana,
CERCLA Site"), HCLs for arsenic, cadmium, and lead are set forth at 40
CFR Section 141.11. These HCLs are not legally applicable to the
current Hill Creek drinking water supply because it is not a public
water system. However, they are potentially relevant and appropriate.
3.1.2
TOXICOLOGY
Inappropriate Cancer Potency Factors with Respect to Ingestion Exposures to
Arsenic.
1.
Co..ent: "of greatest concern is the use of the Carcinogen Assessment
Group model and its estimated potency (unit cancer risk) factor is
assessing lifetime skin cancer risk due to arsenic ingestion in Mlll
Creek." (ARCO)
Response: EPA has reviewed the CAG model and has endorsed it as
relevant and appropriate for use in risk assessments. As is the
3-7
-------
Agency policy with all scientific issues affected by new information,
the potency factor for arsenic was reviewed and was updated as a
result of a series of actions extending over the past year. Based
upon the best available information and on a consensus opinion reached
by the EPA Risk Assessment Forum, the CAG potency factor has been
adjusted. The new value in the October 1986 draft Risk Assessment
Forum Report applies to ingested arsenic and has been used in
estimating risks at Hill Creek.
2.
Comment: "The EA based its estimate of skin cancer from arsenic
ingestion of a Taiwan study which.is known to be flawed because: the
investigators were not 'blinded' as to (exposure);... the Taiwanese
drinking water supply was contaminated with other toxic substances
known (to have effects on the skin);... the exposed population was
racially different...; the Taiwanese study population had nutritional
deficiencies and skin conditions... that might influence the disease
outcome; and the actual exposure levels from food, soil and water,...
are poorly documented..." (ARCO)
Response: It would not have been possible to "blind" a study of this
kind, since it would have involved moving people between villages,
etc. The possible relationship of other contaminants in the well
waters of Taiwan to skin cancer is highly speculative; however, the
relationship of ingested arsenic to skin cancer is firmly established.
The significance of the comment about race is obscure, and its
relevance to the induction of skin cancer by ingested arsenic is
unclear. Helanoma, which has been observed to have different
prevalence rates in various races, is not at issue in Hill Creek. Any
nutritional deficiencies or skin conditions in the Taiwan population
..y veIl be similar to those found in the population found in Hill
Creek. And, finally, the actual exposure levels of the Taiwanese have
been discussed at some length in the CAG document and are felt to be
adequately characterized for risk assessment purposes.
3-8
-------
The Taiwan stu~y of the risks of arsenic in drinking water is not
flawed in the sense that it doesn't provide useful data as implied by
the ARCO comment. As with any study, there are minor deficiencies
that an epidemiologist would wish to avoid in the design of a perfect
study. but the end result of the deliberations of the Risk Forum is a
sClentific consensus that the data are sufficient to indicate a real
human risk of skin cancer from arsenic in drinking water. The October
1986 risk estimate adjusts the unit risk from arsenic ingestion for
survivorship for the lar,er water consumption of Taiwanese as compared
with U.S. males, utilizes a maximum likelihood approach, and employs a
model which is quadratic as well as linear in dose.
3.
Comment: The study 'Feasibility Study to Resolve Questions on the
Relationship of Arsenic in Drinkin, Vater to Skin Cancer' recommended
that the Taiwan based prevalence model should not be used to predict
the risk of arsenic... This study vas not referred to in the EA, nor
was it listed in the table of references, nor was the model modified.
(ARCO)
Response: The "Feasibility Study to Resolve Questions on the
Relationship of Arsenic in Drinkin, Vater to Skin Cancer" (Andelman
and Barnett 1983) was considered durin, the preparation of the EA. It
was not referenced because it is a document that primarily deals with
drinkin, water considerations, whereas the primary exposure of
concern at Hill Creek is with contaminated soil. The su,gested
modification to the CAG risk model for arsenic carcino,enicity
(national differences in incidence and prevalence) was not
incorporated into the EA because the Atency had not yet endorsed these
changes in the model. The Andelman and Barnett report has been
addressed in the new arsenic report by the Risk Assessment Forum and
has been acknowledged in the biblio,raphy of the final EA.
4.
Comment: "The EA appears to have ignored the statements of the EPA
Office of Drinking Vater in its Draft Arsenic 3ealth Advisory dated
3-9.
-------
September 30, 1985, which con~ludes that 'it is judged that ther~ is
currently no suitable quantltative risk estimate for excess cancer due
to cancer ingestion which is applicable to the US...'. The EA does
not in any way attempt to reconcile the risk estimates it derives with
the concern in the EPA draft Document." (ARCO)
Response: Although the EPA Office of Drinking Yater Draft Health
Advisory (HA) was released while the EA was in the final stages of
preparation, the draft views expressed in the HA were considered by
the scientists preparing the EA. The body of evidence supporting the
carcinogenicity of ingested arsenic is overwhelming. Therefore in
order to protect human health it is appropriate to use the CAG
evaluations of the best available data, which, for ingested arsenic,
are in the Taiwan Study. The questions raised about the Taiwan
drinking water epidemiological study, i.e., that there are racial
differences to arsenic induced skin cancer, that there were other
sources of arsenic in the Taiwanese diets, or that there may have been
other carcinogens in the deep well waters, have been considered in
reaching this decision, and have not changed that evaluation, nor have
they prevented the Risk Assessment Forum, which considered the same
issues, from endorsing the CAG approach. Additionally, the draft
Health Advisory has not been adopted as a final Agency position on
arsenic toxicity or on the Taiwan study.
5.
Comment: In addition to the EPA Office of Drinking Yater, EPA
Administrator Lee Thomas also acknowledges the flaws of the Taiwan
based model. In a letter to Senator Paul Laxalt, Administrator Thomas
cited concerns over the deficiencies of the Taiwan model as one of the
bases for his decision to postpone enforcement action under the Safe
Drink!n. Yater Act in Fallon, Nevada. Again the EA fails to
acknowledge or address the position taken by Administrator Thomas.
(ARCO)
3-10
-------
Response: EPA acknowledges this position taken by the Agency.
However, the Risk Assessment Forum is working to resolve these
concerns. The October 1986 draft report of the Risk Assessment Forum
supersedes the draft Health Advisory and the correspondence related to
Fallon, Nevada, and tepresents a new Agency position based on the best
available information.
6.
Comment: "Preliminary results from (an EPA study presented at the)
November, 1986 Annual Heeting of the Society for Risk Analysis
indicate the EPA now believes that inorganic arsenic potency 1s more
than an order of magn1tude less than the value used in the EA."
(ARCO)
Response: The Risk Assessment Forum has recommended that the uca be
moved approximately "one order of magnitude" because of new
assumptions made when calculating the apparent risk. These include 1)
assuming that males performing manual labor in the hot climate drink
3.5 liters of water per day; 2) ad~usting the analysis for surviorship
in the U.S. population; and 3) using both quadratic and linear dose
assumptions to better fit the data to the model. The revisions to the
UCR are designed to respond to issues that have been raised by
interested parties and that they represent the consensus of the Forum.
7.
Comment: ARCO believes that the skin cancer risks in the EA should
have been determined based on mortality rather than morbidity and that
the morbidity/mortality issue would be considered in determining
appropriate remedial measures. (ARCO)
Response: To calculate cancer risks based solely on mortality would
not be protective of human health and welfare. Although ARCO 1S
correct in indicating the much lower mortality for skin cancer than
for other tumors, this lower mortality is primarily due to the ease of
early detection and subsequent treatment. If undiagnosed and not
removed, skin ~ancers can become invasive, metastasizing to various
3-11
-------
internal sites where they are much more lethal. Additionally, the
skin cancers which have been most easily associated with arsenic
exposures are those which occur on non-sun exposed areas. These types
of non-melanoma skin cancer may have a worse prognosis than tumors
occurring on the sun exposed areas, thus these tumors may well have
higher mortality rates than the majority of non-melanoma skin cancers
(as cited in Laerum and Iverson 1981).
In addition, there are new data that implicate arsenic as a cause of
internal cancers, including lung, liver, bladder, and kidney tumors
(Chen et al., 1985; Chen et al:, 1986). These tumors are expected to
have high mortalities.
8.
Comment: "Vith respect to the calculation of excess skin cancer
risks, ARCO notes that there is a extra conservatism in an arsenic
exposure parameter (the parameter "m") used in the CAG model. (ARCO)
Response: The revised arsenic UCR calculated by the Risk Assessment
Forum has addressed this issue by using a different approach in
estimating the shape of the dose response curve at lower exposures.
9.
~omment: The CAG model inappropriately excludes the lower cancer rate
found among females in Taiwan. Omitting these conservatisms would
result in a net reduction in risk estimates of about a factor of ten."
(ARCO)
Response: The CAG model has always considered the cancer rates in
£...les, and the revised UCR developed by the Risk Assessment Forum
has calculated cancer risks for males and females. The emphasis on
males in the EA has been due to the need to protect the most sensitive
population, as there are both male and female residents of Hill Creek.
10.
Comment: "An Argentine study linking very high levels of arsenic in
drinking water with skin cancer has been referred to in the EA in a
3-12
-------
way that obscures the authors' actual conclusions for the sItuation of
interest in Hill Creek." (ARCO)
Response: The comment in the EA referred to the Asto1fi et a1 (1981)
study to put the relative arsenic ingestion levels which were found to
cause arsenic intoxication and skin cancer in perspective, and was not
considering other issues. Although the authors' basis for claiming
that "regular intake of drinking water containing more than 0.1 ppm of
arsenic leads to clearly recognizable signs of intoxication, and
ultimately in some cases to skin cancerR was their review of
observations in Taiwan, Germany, Chile, and Argentina, they concluded
that drinking water containing <0.2 ppm probably was "not sufficient
to cause chronic arsenicism and subsequent cancer" in their Argentina
study. Interestingly, the mortality rate from the high arsenic
regions of Cordoba for cancer was 23.8% versus 15% for the entire
province.
11.
Comment: "The EA's conclusions regarding the risks due to
ingestion at Hill Creek are totally at odds with the EPA's
drinking water standard for arsenic." (ARCO).
arsenic
promulgated
Response: The Agency has compared the total lifetime ingested arsenic
dose in Hill Creek to the HCL and found the Hill Creek dose to be 2.86
ug/kg/day compared to the equivalent HCL dose of 1.43 ug/kg/day.
However, the comparison of total ingested arsenic dose in Hill Creek
to the HCL and the proposed RHCL (HCLG) at Hill Creek is inapproprIate
for the reasons described below. A comparison of soil contaminatIon
to the HCL for arsenic is inappropriate. EPA's "Superfund Public
a.alth Evaluation Hanual (page 58, ICF, October 1986) states that
"AlARs should correspond to the medium (e.g., air, water) for which
they were developed and must be applicable or relevant and appropriate
for site conditions." HCLs are clearly not applicable to soil
contamination. HCLs are required by law to reflect the technological
and economic feasIbility of removing contaminants from drinking water.
3-13
-------
(See Section 1412(b)(4) of SDYA and page 58 of Superfund Public Health
Evaluation Manual). Such considerations are clearly not "relevant and
appr~priate" to soil concentrations at Hill Creek. Technical and cost
considerations of drinking water treatment are simply not relevant to
soil contamination. In addition, the technical and economic
feasibility of soil removal are not a significant issue at Hill Creek.
Such removal is technically and economically feasible.
SARA and the NCP allow identification of cleanup goals that attain or
exceed AlARs (Section 121(d) of SARA, 40 CPR Section 300.68(1) and 50
Fed. Reg. 47919 November 20, 1985). The Agency's Superfund Program
has established a 10-6 excess cancer risk as its remedial action
primary target. On a site specific basis the Agency can establish a
-4 -7
remedial action objective of between 10 and 10 excess cancers. At
Mill Creek the background concentration of arsenic in soils is
approximately 9 to 16 micrograms/gram. This level of arsenic in soil
yields a 1.7 x 10-5 excess cancer risk for the "reasonable maximum
scenario" and 1.7 x 10-6 excess cancer risk for the "average case
scenario". Both of these scenarios yield an excess cancer risk
-4 -7
calculation falling between 10 and 10 excess cancers, and the
"average case scenario" cancer risk is the same as the 1 x 10-6 excess
cancer risk primary target established by the Agency's Superfund
Program. In accordance with the guidance which permits site specific
decisions, EPA has preliminarily identifi~d the background soil
arsenic concentration of approximately 9 to 16 micrograms/gram as the
remedial action objective at Hill Creek.
The primary taret for overall site cleanup to 10-6 excess cancers for
the cumulative dose from all pathways will be used in establishing the
potential cleanup levels for the site. The measure of cleanup success
for drinking water has been preliminarily identified as the detection
limit for arsenic or 4 ug/l. For risk assessment purposes, EPA
assumes that one half the detection limit of 2 ug/l arsenic remains in
the drinking water. aased on the Risk Assessment Forum's October 1986
3-14
-------
draft document addressing the health effects of inorganic arsenic, the
risk associated with this level of drinking water exposure is 1 x 10-4
in males. For soils the arsenic concentration at background levels is
9 to 16 micrograms/gram. The cancer risk associated with this arsenic
level is 1.7 x 10-6 using the average exposure scenario. Similarly,
background concentrations in air correspond to a 5.7 x 10-5 and
1.7 x 10-5 excess cancer risk for arsenic and cadmIum, respectively.
Clearly EPA's primary target of 10-6 excess cancer risk as a
site-specific cleanup target is not appropriate when natural
background levels of these elements exceed a 10-6 cancer risk.
12.
Comment: "EPA has permitted exposures which exceed the drinking water
standard to persist without requiring action." (ARCO)
Response: As discussed above, the arsenic HCL is not the correct
"AlAR" for soils or drinking water at Hill Creek. The HCL for arsenic
is set forth at 40 CFR Section 141.11 at 50 ug/l, but the HCL is not
legally applicable to the Hill Creek drinking water supply because it
is not a public water system. Rowever, the HCL is potentially
relevant and appropriate since it is applicable to alternative public
water systems which may be available to Hill Creek. In addition,
variances granted under Section 1415 of SDYA are granted only where
there is poor raw source water which cannot meet an HCL after
application of the best treatment technology, treatment techniques, or
other means which EPA finds are available taking cost into
consideration. Exemptions granted under Section 1416 of SDYA are
granted only where, due to compelling factors (including economic
factors), a water system is unable to comply with the HCL.
Variances and exemptions can only be granted upon a finding of no
unreasonable risks to health, upon establishment of a compliance
schedule to cause site compliance with the HCL, and mitigation
measures such as medical monitoring, alternative water supplies, etc.,
to protect health during the limited duration of the variances and
3-15
-------
exemptions.
Exemptions"
See "Guidance for the Issuance of Variances and
(Hay 1979, Office of Drinking Water, WSG 64).
In addition, the unique factors pertaining to EPA and State SOW
enforcement discretion at individual community water supplies are not
related to or relevant to CERCLA or Hill Creek, Hontana's problems.
13.
Comment: "Dietary inorganic arsenic intake has been and may be
substantial and may in certain population subgroups exceed arsenic
exposures in Hill Creek." (ARCO)
Response: The intake of arsenic from dietary sources has little
bearing on the risk assessment which is concerned with incremental
environmental risk. Use of the UCR from the Taiwanese study for the
population in Hill Creek requires the assumption that the dietary
levels of arsenic are the same in the two populations. Indeed, if
populations in Hill Creek have a greater dietary intake of arsenic
than the Taiwanese, then the risk estimates should be revised upward
to take into account the additional intake of arsenic from dietary
sources.
14.
Comment: "Elevated urinary arsenic levels are not an adverse health
effect or an indicator of such effects, but are merely an indicator of
arsenic exposure."
(ARCO)
Response: Elevated urinary arsenic is an indicator of higher than
normal arsenic exposure. Given the ~arcinogenicity and toxicity of
arsenic, it is prudent to consider the possible adverse effects in
individuals with higher than normal exposures.
15.
Comment: "Evidence suggests that arsenic metabolism and induction of
adverse effects may operate in a nonlinear fashion. (Some data
suggest) a threshold or non-linear response region may exist for the
induction of cancer." (ARCO)
3-16
-------
Response: The data suggesting a threshold or non-linear dose response
region for the induction of cancer are tenuous at best. The fact that
there is evidence that one pathway of metabolism saturates at high
levels of exposure is hardly convincing given that the mechanism of
arsenic induced carcinogenesis is unknown. The reversibility of some
precursor skin lesions would also be difficult to evaluate. Risk
assessment methods currently in use have no way of incorporating this
latter type of information. The use of the linear non threshold dose
response model is perhaps a conservative assumption (as stated in the
EA); however, no other assumptions with regard to plausible dose
response relationships are either useful or defensible with the
current state of knowledge. When the Risk Assessment Forum applied a
quadratic model to the Taiwan data to compare the goodness-of-fit to
the linear model, the results were quite comparable, indicating that
use of the linear non threshold dose model was appropriate.
Additionally, the progression and reversibility of the early lesion is
totally irrelevant to the metabolism of arsenic. The issue of
nonlinear metabolism was addressed in the Risk Assessment Forum
document which cited evidence that methylation capacity in humans is
not saturated until doses on the order of 600 to 1000 ug per day
(several orders of magnitude over the estimated exposures at Hill
Creek) are reached.
16.
Comment: The discussion of negative epidemiological studies is very
limited, "the EA appears to be selectively excluding studies and
information which contrast with its chosen position in the EA."
(ARCO)
Response: The negative epidemiological studies reported in the
literature were considered in preparing the EA. The studies were
generally flawed and of inadequate quality to detect effects.
Problems with these studies are noted in the Health Assessment
3-17
-------
Document for Inorganic arsenic (EPA (1984) and are included in the EA
by r.ference. Additionally, the other epidemiological studies were
considered by the Risk Assessment Forum as reflected in the October
1986 draft report and were found to be deficient. The Forum
reaffirmed the appropriateness of using the Taiwan study for risk
assessment purposes.
Inappropriate Cancer Potency Factors with Respect to Inhalation Exposure
to Arsenic
17.
Comment: "Overall, the EA risks from arsenic inhalation are
overestimated because the occupational data that EPA used is the basis
for the cancer potency estimate included inhalation exposure to
cadmium as well as arsenic. Separate consideration of cadmium and
arsenic inhalation in Hill Creek results in double counting the risks
posed by these elements. The EA should have taken the effects of
double counting into consideration in the assessment of cadmium and
arsenic inhalation risks." (ARCO)
Response: The UCRs have been developed with an awareness of possible
concomitant exposures to other contaminants. Consequently, the UCRs
have already been adjusted where adequate data exist to make such
modifications. Vhen possible, the UCRs have been based on studies
that have one primary contaminant. Therefore, the UCRs for arsenic
and cadmium are reflections of only arsenic or cadmium exposures and
risks, respectively. See EPA (1984) Health Assessment Document for
Inorganic Arsenic for further detail.
18.
Comment: "in the case of arsenic,... the Agency did not adjust for
the contribution of smoking to the observed lung cancer risk when
calculating the UCR." (ARCO)
Response: The Agency considered the potential contribution of smoking
to lung cancer risk in deriving the UCR for arsenic but did not adjust
3-18
-------
for smoking because the data were often not available. The Agency
considered the evidence sufficient to show that arsenic was
responsible for the increased incidence of respiratory cancer in
exposed workers irregardless of other exposures. (EPA, 1984 Health
Assessment Document for Inorganic Arsenic). The Agency acknowledges
that the unit cancer risk is an upper bound estimate of risk, i.e.,
that actual risks may be lower but are unlikely to be higher than the
UCR. Even if smoking did have an impact on lung cancer rates in the
reported studies, the UCR would be applicable to populations with a
similar population of smokers to that of the work place studied.
19.
.
Comment: "...the Agency did not attempt to apportion the observed
lung cancer incidence among... contributing causes (in deriving the
UCR's for cadmium and arsenic from studies with confounding exposures,
e.g., beryllium, sulfur dioxide). The failure to consider these
additional factors leads to an inflation of the UCRs developed from
these studies which instead of reflecting the results of exposure to a
single substance actually represent the combined effects of exposures
to arsenic, cadmium and smoking as well as other factors." (ARCO)
Response: The Agency considered the potential contribution of other
agents to lung cancer risk in deriving the UCR arsenic. Exposure to
these other agents was not felt to have a significant impact on the
cancer risk attributable to arsenic and the agency considered the
evidence that arsenic was a human lung carcinogen sufficient
irregardless of exposure to other agents. The Agency acknowledges
that the UCR is an upperbound risk estimate. See EP~ (1984) Health
Assessment Document for Inorganic Arsenic.
20.
Comment: ARCO felt that in developing arsenic inhalation UCRs EPA
significantly underestimated exposures to the compounds of concern by
ignoring exposures during non-working hours. CAG did not take into
consideration that the majority of smelter workers lived in nearby
communities and were thus exposed to environmental levels for 16 hours
3-19
-------
per day for 240 days and 24 ~ours per day for essentially the rest of
the year. This failure to account for environmental exposure leads to
an overestimation of the cancer potency. (ARCO)
Response: The available data indicate that environmental levels of
cadmium and arsenic are considerably lower than in the work places
studied. If CAG had used environmental exposures to calculate the
UCRs, the cancer potency values would have been higher. Given the
relatively low exposure in the environment as compared to the high
levels in the workplace, the failure to include environmental,
nonworkplace exposures in the calculation has had an insignificant
effect on the UCR.
21.
Comment: The respiratory health effects including noncarcinogenic
effects of arsenic are not adequately addressed. (Public)
Response: The EA was written to evaluate the current health risks at
Hill Creek. The adverse health effects reported during the operation
of the smelter are not relevant to the purpose of the EA, and no
current data are available on the respiratory health effects in Hill
Creek.
Inappropriate Cancer Potency Factor with Respect to Ingestion Exposure to
Cadmium and the RfD
22.
Comment: The noncarcinogenic hazard index for cadmium exposure was
inappropriately derived as it was based on an HCL rather than en an
ADI or RfD. The HCL represents only a fraction of the ADI. (ARCO)
Response: Vhile it is usually true that the HCL is only a fraction of
the ADI, there are instances where the HCL may approximate the ADI.
In the revised EA, the best available data has been utilized to
develop an ADI for ingested cadmium, including consideration of other
possible sources of cadmium.
3-20
-------
Inappropriate Cancer Potency Factor with Respect to Inhalation Exposure
to Cadmium and the RfD
23.
Comment: "Overall, the EA risks from cadmium inhalation are
overestimated because the occupational data that EPA used as the basis
for the cancer potency estimate included inhalation exposure to
arsenic as well as cadmium. Separate consideration of cadmium and
arsenic inhalation in Hill Creek results in double counting the risks
posed by these elements. The EA should have taken the effects of
double counting into consideration in the assessment of cadmium and
arsenic inhalation risks. (ARCO)
Response: The UCRs have been developed with an awareness of possible
concomitant exposures to other contaminants. Consequently, the UCRs
have already been adjusted where adequate data exist to make such
modifications. Vhen possible, the UCRs have been based on studies
that have one primary contaminant. Therefore, there is no double
counting involved, and it is appropriate to consider the effects of
arsenic and cadmium on lung cancer as additives while evaluating risks
in Hill Creek. See EPA (1984) Health Assessment Document for
Inorganic Arsenic.
24.
Comment: The EA did not use the most up-to-data UCR for cadmium
inhalation which would further reduce the risk estimate. (ARCO)
Response: The best currently available UCR has been used in the EA.
Currently EPA is recommending a UCR or 1.8 x 10-3 (ug/m3)-1 equivalent
to 6.1 (mg/kg/day)-1. This value was reported in the EA but was
inadvertently not used in the risk calculations. A recent document
prepared by the State of California Department of Health Services (CHS
1986) and based on new information provided by Thun (1986) suggests
that the UCR for cadmium may be underestlmated in the EPA CAG
3-21
-------
document. A careful consideration of this new evidence has been
conducted before determining the proper UCR for use for cadmium in the
EA.
2~.
Comment: ARCO felt that in developing the cadmium inhalation UCRs,
EPA significantly underestimated exposures to the compounds of concern
by ignoring exposures during non-working hours because CAG did not
take into consideration that the majority of smelter workers lived in
nearby communities and were thus exposed to environmental levels for
16 hours per day for 240 days and 24 hours per day for essentially the
rest of the year. This failure to fully acknowledge the conditions of
the underlying studies leads to an overestimate of the UCRs thus
developed." (ARCO)
Response: As stated in another response, the available data indicate
that environmental levels of cadmium and arsenic are considerably
lower than in the work places studied. If CAG had used environmental
exposures alone to calculate the cadmium UCR, the cancer potency value
would have been much higher. Given the relatively low exposures in
the environment as compared to the high levels in the workplace, the
failure to include environmental, nonworkplace exposures in the
calculation has had an insignificant effect on the UCR.
26.
Comment: The respiratory health effects of cadmium are not fully
evaluated (Public)
Response: The calculated inhalation exposures of cadmium were not
thou,ht to be high enough to cause acute respiratory health effects in
and of themselves. In other to be more complete, the revised EA has
fully considered such effects.
3-22
-------
Inappropriate Approach To Determine Health Risk Associated with
Exposure To Lead.
27.
Comment: "The EPA states that it has chosen to depart from the
standard exposure assessment procedures because of the extreme
dependence of lead toxicity on its chemical form in the environment
and individual variation in susceptibility to toxic effects. Thus,
the EA concludes the body burdens are more accurate indications of
toxicity than exposure. Since, however, the EA merely estimates body
burden (i.e., blood lead) levels for Hill Creek based on environmental
contaminant levels rather than actually measuring blood lead, it is
uncl.ar floW this approach provides any increase in assessment validity
over using the approach to evaluating health risk based on exposure.
Specifically, the EA suggests that the values used in the multimedia
scenario may underestimate exposure. However, use of one of the data
sets indicates that the model may overestimate exposure. (ARCO)
Response: Nowhere does the EA state that "it has chosen to depart
from the standard exposure assessment procedures because of the
extreme dependence of lead toxicity on its chemical form in the
environment." Dosimetry is critical to risk assessment and the
preferred estimate is the "effective" dose--the dose delivered to the
target which induces the adverse effect. Hore often than not,
however, it is necessary to estimate the "exposure" dose-- the dose to
which an individual is exposed. In the case of lead, it is possible
to get a step closer to the "effective" dose by estimating the dose
which makes it into the blood stream--the blood lead level. Since the
toxicity of lead has been correlated with blood lead levels and shows
a 8uch better relationship to these (the intake "doses"), the EA
estimates the blood lead levels because the toxicity information is
provided in terms of blood lead levels correlated to adverse effects,
e.g., neurotoxicity.
3-23
-------
The apparent variation of the regression coefficients among studies is
discussed in the EA, and the reasons for selection of specific values
are explained. It would not be scientifically justified to use a
regression coefficient from anyone of the studies without considering
the others.
28.
Comment: The intercept term used in the risk estimate for lead of
12.7 ug/dL may result in an overestimation of exposure and risk.
(ARCO)
Response: The intercept term of 12.7 ug/dl vas obtained from a draft
EPA document (EPA 1983). More recent data (CDC, 1985, Preventing Lead
Poisoning in Young Children) sug,est that a value of around 6-7 ug/dl
may be more appropriate. This updated value has been used in the
revised EA.
29.
Comment: The potential health risks associated with exposures to lead
are not sufficiently addressed. (Public)
Response: Toxic effects of lead that are observed at lov exposure
levels are discussed in detail in the EA. Toxic effects that are only
associated vith very high exposure to lead or that are minor compared
to effects occurring at the same or lover levels of exposure are
discussed briefly or not at all in the EA' because these effects are
either considered unlikely to be manifested in the Mill Creek area or
if they did occur would have only a minor impact relative to more
serious effects that would be present. A complete discussion of the
health effects associated vith exposure to lead is beyond the scope of
the EA.
Carcinogens Not Addressed at the Mill Creek Site
30.
Comment:
"Medical data and research indicate that ten metals or
compounds of these metals can be considered carcinogenic."
These
3-24
-------
metals also pose other health risks. However, several of these
were not considered in the EA and the additional or synerglstic
effects of these metals were not considered. (Public)
metals
Response: Arsenic and cadmium are considered carcinogenlc by EPA, are
present at elevated levels in the Hill Creek area, and were therefore
considered as carcinogens in the EA. Lead and zinc are present at
elevated levels in the Hill Creek area but are not considered to be
carcinocenic by EPA and were therefore treated as noncarcinogens in
the EA. (It should be noted that certain lead salts are considered
carcinocenic but the metal itself is not considered to be a
carcinocen.) Certain nickel salts and beryllium are considered
carcinocenic by EPA but were not detected at elevated concentrations
at Hill Creek and were not considered as they would not affect the
excess lifetime cancer risk. Cobalt, iron, and titanium not present
at elevated concentrations at Hill Creek, are not considered to be
carcinocens by EPA, and therefore were not considered. The metals
present at background levels will have no effect on the excess
carcinogenic risk associated with exposure to carcinogens if they
interact in an additive fashion. No information is available on
potential antagonistic or synergistic interactions and therefore such
interactions were not discussed in detail in the EA. However, this
does not preclude EPA from considering the additive effects on
individual organs.
Effect of Interactions Among the Metals Present at the Hill Creek Site
31.
Comment: "...the EA failed to follow EPA guidelines
of risk/endangerment assessments)...(in its) failure
hazard index for multiple chemical exposure. (ARCO)
(for the conduct
to develop a
Response: The development of a hazard index for the multiple chemical
exposure was considered during preparation of the EA but was not
adopted for two reasons. Firstly, the proposed guidelines were not
3-25
-------
yet adopted as Agency policy when the EA was wrltten, and, secondly,
estilllated addi tive toxici tles were thought to be minor compared to the
carcinogenic hazards of arsenic or cadmium, or to the acute toxicitles
of lead. The revised EA has developed a hazard index for multiple
chemlcal exposure.
32.
Comment: "In the EA, the Agency has suggested that the risks
potentially posed to the Hill Creek residents by smelter-related
contaminants may be intensified by the presence of multiple
contaminants. There is no evidence suggesting the enhancement of
adverse effects for the elements of concern due to the presence of the
other contaminants. ...evidence exists that interactions between
these elements (Cd, As) may be slight or antagonistic rather than
addi tive."
(ARCO)
Response: This comment misrepresents the discussion of additive
toxicity on page 90 of the 1986 EA, which simply points out that
contaminants affecting the same organ should be viewed additively
unless there is sufficient data to support another assumption.
33.
Comment: The additive or synergistic interactions among chemicals are
poorly understood at this time. (Public)
Response:
The interactions between the contamlnants of concern at
Hill Creek are poorly understood because there is so little
experimental information. This situation is not likely to be resolved
in the near future because of the inherent study design difficulties.
34.
Comment: The cumulative hazard index for lead exposure and cadmium
ingestion is inappropriate because the toxicological endpoints are
different. (ARCO)
Response: If two agents cause simllar toxicities to an organ by
unknown mechanisms, then it is Agel,cy policy to consider the effec ts
3-26
-------
to be additive. (Guidelines
Chemical Mixtures, EPA 1986;
34014-34023).
for the Health Risk Assessment of
FRSI, No. 185, September 24, 1986; pp.
Potential Beneficial Effects of Arsenic
35.
Comment: "...the EA should have taken into account the possible
beneficial aspects of arsenic ingestion at low doses." (ARCO)
Response: The National Academy of Science report on the possible role
of ingested arsenic as a dietary essential element was evaluated
during the preparation of the EA. It was decided that the evidence
for it being an essential element was not sufficient to incorporate
into the EA, which was considering the adverse effects of the
ingestion of much higher levels of arsenic. The Risk Assessment Forum
has recently evaluated the same issue and has concluded that the data
supporting arsenic as an essential nutritional element is
insufficient.
3.1.3
EXPOSURE
Exposure to Background Concentrations of the Contaminants
1.
Comment:
"The EA fails to note that the ambient air concentrations of
cadmium and arsenic, and hence the estimated inhalation
essentially at background, i.e., the levels which would
absence 01 the smelter." (ARCO)
risks are
exist in the
Response: The September, 1987 Endangerment Assessment/Public Health
Evaluation: Hill Creek, Hontana Anaconda Smelter site presents
airborne concentrations of trace elements in Hill Creek during 1984.
For arsenic durlng 1984 observed average values (82 samples) exceeded
background levels (.01 ug/m3) for both arsenic and cadmium by a fac.or
of 3 (0.039 ug/m3). In addition, the Final Remedial Investigation
3-27
-------
Report for Mill Creek, Montana reports prelimlnary data on particulate
matter and heavy metal concentrations in close proximity to the
Smelter collected from August 1986 to February 1987. These data shov
an average arsenic value of .024 ug/m3 at station MCY. The August
1986 to February 1987 data set also reported maximum cadmium values of
0.043 and 0.031 ug/m3 (at the Kortum Storage and MCY stations,
respectively) vhich exceed the background cadmium concentration
3
reported for vestern states (0.01 ug/m ).
2.
Comment: ". .. the EA failed to follov EPA guidelines (for the conduct
of risk/endangerment assessment] ... (in its] ... neglec~ of
background concentrations of contaminants."
(ARCO)
Response: The EA did not neglect background contaminant levels in its
conduct of the risk/endangerment assessment (e.g., Tables 1 and 10 1n
the EA). As can be seen from these tables, and particularly from
Table 1, concentrations of arsenic, cadmium, and lead are clearly
above expected background levels. See Appendix B, Background Arsenlc,
Cadmium, and Lead Concentrations in Soil, Yater, and Air for Mill
Creek, Montana in the Final RI/FS for background levels. Levels of
contamination found in Mill Creek exceed background levels.
3.
Commen t :
The levels of lead in soil at Mill Creek are comparable to
levels in urban soil.
(ARCO)
Response: Yhether or not lead levels in soil at Mill Creek are equal
to urban levels is,irrelevan~ to vhether or not there is a health
risk. Hovever, EPA is in the process of banning lead in gasollne, and
lead has been removed from a number of other commercial products in
order to lover exposures in urban areas.
3-28
-------
Inappropriate Samples
4.
Comment: "Evaluation of contam1nant levels and exposures at M1II
Creek suffers from numerous deficiencies which call into quest10n the
conclusions for the EA's analysis. ... For example, compar1sons of
data taken by TetraTech and Ecology and Environment (E&E) suggest that
the sample for E&E house number 16 (the source of the maX1mum lead
concentration used in the worst-case analyses) was taken 1n a garage,
which is likely to have sources of lead contamination other than the
smelter. Similarly. TetraTech's data indicate E&E house number 14 ~as
uninhabited at the time of sampling. If this is the case, dust and
dirt are likely to have accumulated in this home." (ARCO)
Response: The choices of which data to use in estimating the possible
exposure levels of residents of Mill Creek were made very carefully
during the preparation of the EA. Data were selected, where possible,
that had been subjected to the full rigors of the EPA data
verification program. The ARCO comment about the inappropriate b1as
injected in the EA by use of an E&E soil sample value for house number
16 needs to be considered in light of other lead soil values in Mill
Creek that were 1n the same range. Consequently, the reported value
of house number 16 has supportive data that substantiate its
appropriateness. Similarly, the comment that house number 14 (E&E)
was uninhabited at the time of sampling does not deny that the levels
of contaminants were high in the house, yere higher after professional
house cleaning, and were similar to those in other sampled houses. It
is also likely that had the house been inhabited at the time of
sampling that normal household activities (i.e., open windows,
inhabitants track1ng dirt into the house, etc.) would have increased
the soil contam1nation levels detected in the house. The issues
raised by ARCO do not constitute "deficiencies" in evaluation of
contaminant levels or exposure in these instances which would "call
into question the conclusions of the EA's analysis." In add1tion,
3-29
-------
much of the data used by EPA was collected by contra~tors employed by
ARCO.and was not identlfied as being of limited value.
5.
Comment: "In a related issue, the EA was inconsistent in its use of
the available data. For example, in calculating mean soil
concentrations, the EA specifically omits the data collected by E&E,
claiming that it might "bias the contamination values toward those in
soils closer to the homes" which the EA suggests were more likely to
have been disturbed by Hill Creek residents (EA, p. 26). Yet later,
the EA uses one of these data points (specifically, the high lead
value questioned above) for use in evaluating the worst-case exposure
scenario."
(ARCO)
Response: The EA was not inconsistent in its use of the available
data. The decision not to use samples collected where soil might have
been disturbed by Hill Creek residents was made to most a~curately
determine possible contamination over time at the residence. The E&E
data is within the same general range, but was not considered to be as
representative as other data. Use of one of the excluded data points
for another purpose is not inconsistent with this approach. As
pointed out above in response to another comment, ample data exist to
justify the use of the lead soil values as an indication of possible
minimal and maximal likely case exposures.
6.
Comment: People on-site are more likely to contact fine material in
soils and, therefore, use of 3-inch soil samples may not be
appropriate. Bossard and Associates collected samples of fine (less
than 45 microns in diameter) from throughout the Hill Creek area,
co.posited these samples into five samples for analysis, and reported
that arithmetic mean concentrations of metals in this soil. These
arithmetic mean concentrations were then compared with the geometric
mean concentrations of metals in 3-inch soil samples. Based on this
comparison, Bossard noted that concentrations of metals in finer soils
are higher than in the 3-inch samples.
(Public)
3-30
-------
Response: Although it is possible that people are more llkely to
contact finer soil particles, it is not possible to conclude
definitively that this is the case. In addition, it is inappropriate
to compare arithmetic mean concentrations with geometric mean
concentrations of metals. Finally, the maximum soil value used in the
worst-case exposure assessment in the EA is the above the arithmetic
mean concentration for soil arsenic and, therefore, use of the Bossard
data would give a value within the range of risks already presented in
the EA.
7.
Comment: Sampling in the Hill Creek area appears to have been
conducted randomly without a defined plan. (Public)
Response: Over the years, there have been many sampling activities
by ARCO and by EPA directed toward defining the environmental hazards
to Hill Creek residents, or toward determining the effects of ARCO
smelting activities on the surrounding area. The more recent
samplings have been designed to specifically determine the levels of
contaminants in media that would present exposure to residents. These
efforts have been successful; they have consistently documented
excessive levels of contaminants and have been found to be
statistically representative. Further sampling efforts might be
required to determine effectiveness of any remedial activities.
Assumptions Inconsistent with EPA Guidance
General Response: Assumptions used in the revised EA have been changed to
be consistent with the finalized PHE manual (EPA 1986) or if the
assumptions are not followed, an explanation of the reason for the
deviation is presented. EPA may depart from the guidance when lt has
adequate reasons to do so.
3-31
-------
8.
Comment: It... the E~ failed to follow EPA gU1del1nes [for the conduct
of risk/endangerment assessment] ... [In its use of 76.2 year lifespan
vs. 70-yr recommended value] ....It (ARCO)
Response: The EA followed the best available EPA guidance in the use
of a 76.2-year lifespan vs. the 70-year lifespan recommended in the
draft publi~ health evaluation document referenced by ARCO. The
recommendation to use 76.2 years came directly from CAG, and is a more
representative number for the present day. However, to be consistent
with current EPA guidelines for site-specific risk assessments
presented in the finalized PHE manual (EPA 1986), a 70-year lifetime
was used to calculate risks in the revised EA.
9.
Comment: It... the EA failed to follow EPA guidelines (for the conduct
of risk/endangerment assessment] ... (in its use of body weights for
children 2-6 of 13 to 22 instead of the 10 to 25 kg recommended) ...."
(ARCO)
Response: As stated in the previous response, the use of body weights
for children 2 to 5 of 13 to 22 kg, instead of 10 to 25 kg recommended
in the public health evaluation guidelines, was based upon the
specific recommendation of CAG at the time the EA was prepared.
However, as noted above, values reported in the finalized PHE manual
were used in the revised EA.
10.
Comment: It... it should be noted that the absorption factor for
arsenic inhalation used by EPA in its calculations for Hill Creek
(0.40) differs from that used by the EPA's CAG (0.30).It (ARCO)
Response: As stated above in response to several comments about the
~
approach or assumptions used in evaluation the exposures of risks 1n
the EA, the percent retention of 0.40 for inhaled arsenic was
suggested by CAG. Given the particulate sizes and the physiodynam1cs
of human respiration, such a factor appears to be correct. H~wever,
3-32
-------
as the figure of 30 percent absorption is presented in the EPA (1984)
Health Assessment Document for Inorganic Arsenic, this value vas used
in the revised EA.
Bioavailability of Arsenic
11.
Comment:
"... the EA should have taken into consideration the reduced
bioavailability of soil-bound arsenic."
(ARCO)
Response: The values used in the EA
bioavailability in ingested soil are
the published literature, and follow
to estimate the arsenic
based upon the best estimates in
normal EPA guidelines.
12.
Comment: The assumption that
arsenic is absorbed following
an overestimation of risks.
between 88 and 98 percent of soil-bound
ingestion is inappropriate and leads to
(ARCO)
Response: As stated above, the listed values, developed in the EPA
(1984) Health Assessment Document for Inorganic Arsenic, vere the best
available in the published, peer-reviewed literature and vere deemed
to be scientifically appropriate for the EA.
13.
Comment:
Bench tests of arsenic extractability vere not considered in
the report (ARCO).
Response: The preliminary data presented by ARCO about the
bioavailability of soil-bound arsenic are not of use for the folloving
reasons: (1) the full conditions of the tests are not known; (2) the
experiments have not been published in the peer-revieved scientific
literature; and (3) there is no evidence presented about the
biological relevance of the rudimentary tests conducted.
There is a dlscrepancy between the description provided 1n the text
and the actual exper1mental data reported 1n Tables 1 and 2 for the
3-33
-------
simulated stomach digestions. The introduction refers to SOP-026
(Te~raTech 1984) as a procedure for digesting soil samples ln HCl (pH
0.8 and pH 2) at 37° ln an attempt to mimic stomach conditlons.
Tables 1 and 2 report on the leaching of metals from soil samples upon
digestion at 37° wlth mlxtures of HN03/H202 and HN03/HCl04 at pH 0.8
and pH 2. A signiflcant difference between the two procedures is the
oxidizing power of the latter combinations relative to HCI solutlons.
A complete, step-by-step description of the digestion procedure was
not available at this time. This would be critical in establishing
how closely the digestion procedures approach the absorption process
under physiologlcal conditions. Absorption through a membrane
represents a non-equilibrium situation because absorbed material is
rapidly removed by the systematic circulation. The digestion
procedure used by TetraTech is suggestive of an equilibrium situation
where the amount measured as leachate represents a partition value
between the liquid and solid phases. Thus, the appearance of metal in
the liquid phase indicates that the material is extractable from the
soil matrix under the conditions used. The question of how to apply
this number to predict bioavailabi1ity is more difficult to answer.
At pH 2, only 30 percent of arsenic is extracted into the liquid phase
in the digestion study. If this information is pertinent to
absorption from the gut, one can presume that under physiological
absorption conditions only 30 percent of the arsenic would be
immediately available for absorption. However, as the metal is
removed from the liquid phase by absorption through the stomach or
intestinal walls, more metal is released from the solid matrlx in
order to maintaln equilibrium. The final absorption number is likely
to be higher than that lnitla1ly determined by the digestion
procedure.
3-34
-------
Calculation of Cadmium Exposure
14.
Commen t: . ". .. the EA made an order of magni tude error 1n
the worst-case cadm1um ingestion level which would result
the risk estimate to veIl belov that correspond1ng to the
drinking vater standard." (ARCD)
es tlma t lng
in reduc1ng
cadmium
Response: This error has been corrected and the revised EA v1ll
reflects the nev value.
Limited Use of the Urinary Arsenic Measurements
15.
Comment: "To date, EPA tias mainly justlfied its concern for public
health and excess skln cancer risk on the urine arsenic results for
children in Mill Creek.
Yet, the EA makes no use of the urine arsenlC
results in calculating its risk estimate."
(ARCD)
Response: The EA dld use the urine arsenic results to verify the
reasonableness of the calculated arsenic exposure in Hill Creek (p.
87), but thls point has been further developed 1n the revised EA.
Under steady state conditions, the concentration of arsenic in urine
corresponds to 60 percent (approxlmately) of the absorbed dose
(Valentine et al. 1979. Buchet et al. 1981, Charbouueau et al. 1981).
From Table 14 (Hill Creek Endangerment Assessment):
Arsenic levels in urlne (ug/liter):
range 12-118 (Mill Creek)
range 4-150 (Anaconda Vest)
range 4-41 (Anaconda East)
Subtract 25 ug As/liter as a reasonable value for dietary contributlon
(IARC Honograph No. 23, pp. 72-73):
ug As/liter urine Ix 1/0.6]
Absorbed As (wg)
Hi 11 Creek
Anaconda Vest
Anaconda East
93
125
16
155
208
27
3-35
-------
Corresponding so11 'concentrat10ns assuming ingestion of 100 mg:
Hill Creek
Anaconda Vest
Anaconda East
As (ppm) in Soil
1,550
2,080
270
The calculat10ns assume 100 percent absorption of arsenic in soil;
lover absorpt10n would lead to higher soil concentrations of arsenic
in order to account for the urinary concentrations measured. This
leads to the conclusion that the bioavailability of arsenic in soil
should be cons1dered h1gh.
From Hill Creek Endangerment Assessment:
o
children 1ngest 100 mg/day of sOlI
o
arsenic concentration 2,180 ppm (highest QA/QC)
541 ppm (geometric mean)
o
absorpt10n fract10n 0.88 to 0.98
o
daily 1ngestion:
(53) ~g
54~g/g soil x 0.1 g soil x 0.80(0.98) . 43
References
Valentine, J.; Kaug, H.R.; and Spivey, G. 1979. Arsenic levels in
human blood, urine, and hair in response to exposure via drinking
vater. Environ. Res. 20:24-32.
Suchey, V.P.; Lauwery. S.R.; and Roels, H. 1981. Urinary excretion
of inorganic arsen1C and its metabolites after repeated ingest10n
of sodium metaarsenite by volunteers. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ.
Sealth, 48:111-118.
Charbouneau, S.H.; Spencer, K; Bryce, F.; and Sandi, E. 1979.
Arsen1C excret10n of monkeys dosed vith arsenic-eonta1n1ng fish
or w1th 1norgan1c arsenic. Bull. Env1ron. Con tam. Toxieol.
20:470-477.
3-36
-------
16.
Comment: "Elevated ur1nary arsenic levels are not an adverse health
effect or ind1cator of such effects, but are merely an indIcator of
arsenic exposure."
(ARCO)
Response: Elevated urinary arsenic is an ind1cator of higher than
normal arsenic exposure. Given the knovn human toxicities or arsenic,
it is prudent to consider vhether individuals shoving evidence of
increased exposures to arsenic (as indicated by elevated urinary
levels) are likely to suffer adverse effects.
17.
Comment: Urinary arsen1C levels in Hill Creek children are high.
They may not be substantially above levels in other locations, but the
Hill Creek enVIronment may be more complex than other areas reporting
high urinary arsenic levels. (Public)
Response: The observed urinary levels of arsenic in children in H1ll
Creek are of concern 1n and of themselves because of the
carcinogenIcity of arsen1C. Additionally. the urinary arsenic levels
may indicate that children of Hill Creek might be susceptible to
other, as yet poorly understood, diseases. The presence of other
contaminants in the Hill Creek environment raises the possibility that
there could be additive or synergistic effects of the contaminants 1n
causing toxicities.
Historical Sampling Data
18. Comment: Air quality sampling data collected prior to cessation of
, smelter activities should have been revieved and included. In
addition, data collected during H1ll Creek construction should have
been included. (Public)
Response: The a1r qualIty in the Hill Creek area vas likely to have
been sign1ficantly dIfferent from current condit1ons vhen the smelter
vas in operatIon.
As the purpose of the EA vas to assess r1sks
3-37
-------
associated vith current
alternatlve, the use of
inappropriate in the EA.
and future exposure under the no actlon
alr data from a former time period yould be
The data collected vhlle the smelter yas in
operatlon may be used in the future.
Form of Arsenic in the Environment
19.
Comment:
Is the arsenic in the soil trioxide or pentoxide?
(Public)
Response: The maJorlty of the arsenic in the soil and ground vater of
Hill Creek appears to be 1n the pentoxide form. This has little
relevance to health lssues, because there is evidence that the
pentoxide form lS converted to the trioxide form in the body prior to
methylatlon (Harafante et al. 1985), and the appearance of arsenic in
the urine is sufficient eVldence of bioavailabllity.
Incidents of Skin Cancer
20.
Comment: the hlgh 1nCldence of skin cancer that vould be predlcted by
EPA's UCR has not been observed in U.S. populations vith elevated
arsenic levels in thelr drinking vater. See Envlronmental Health
Associates, Inc. (1986) An Epidemiologic Investigation of Skin Cancer
in Deer Lodge and Silver Bov Counties, Hontana 1980-1986. (ARCO)
Response:
Assessment.
See reSPQnse to Comment #20 in Section 4.0 Health
21., Comment:~ There lS no evidence in Hill Creek or neighboring
communities that any arsenlC induced skin cancers have actually
occurred. (ARCO)
Response:
See response to Comment #20 above.
3-38
-------
Other Types of Exposures
22.
Comment: Indoor sampling studles vere lnadequate. Indoor exposure
studies should be thorough because people spend much tlme indoors.
(Public)
Response: EPA agrees that indoor sampllng vas not extensive.
Hovever, considerlng the magnitude of the problem at the Hill Creek
area, and that house dust levels may likely correlate vith outdoor
soil levels lt dld not seem necessary to determine levels of indoor
contaminatlon before proceeding vith the EA.
23.
Comment: Exposure to house dust via ingestion or inhalation vas not
directly considered. (ARCO)
Response: ThlS exposure to household dust vas consldered lmplicitly
in the draft EA and dlscussed in more detail in the revised EA.
24.
Comment: EPA notes that lngestion of garden vegetables grovn in
contaminated soil may contribute to exposure, but fails to present
information documenting this route as potentially significant. (ARCO)
Response: Detall on the potential for exposure to soil metals via
ingestion of contaminated vegetables is presented in the revised EA.
25.
Comment: The report fails to address the exposure associated vith
contaminant transport during surface vater run-off. (Public)
Response: Exposure to contamlnants mobllized during surface vater
run-off vas not consldered in the EA because it vas not consldered
likely to be a problem under current use conditions. Hovever, thlS
assumption has been explalned in more detail in the revlsed EA
3-39
-------
3.2
LEGAL ISSUES
Comments on legal issues recelved by EPA have been grouped lnto tnree
categories. They include comments on the EA, comments concerning ARARs,
and comments on the Mlll Creek draft RI/FS.
3.2.1
ENDANGERMENT ASSESSMENT
1.
Comment:
The EA fails to consider a number of key scientlflC studies
and recommendations.
(ARCO)
Response: All studles and recommendatlons available to EPA have been
considered in the revised EA. They have been addressed in a manner
consistent vith the Risk Assessment Forum's evaluation of arsenic.
Apparent confllcts betveen EPA's P!ograms regarding the
carcinogenlcity of arsenic have been resolved.
2.
Comment: EPA failed to follov EPA guidance for conducting
endangerment assessments and publlC health evaluations. (ARCO)
~esponse: EPA has made necessary changes to follov the guidance or
has provlded explanations of vhere the guidance vas not folloved and
vhy. EPA may depart from the guidance vhen it has adequate reason to
do so. The guidance is, after all, guidance.
3.
Comment:
EPA failed to compare media concentratlons to requirements,
standards, and criteria.
(ARCO)
Response: The draft RIfFS reports and EPA's ARARs analysls Supplement
to the RIfFS contain such comparisons. They have also been included
in the revised EA.
4.
Comment: EPA's offlc of Drlnklng Vater, In the Nov. 13, 1985.
proposed RMCL for arsenlC and the draft Health Advlsory for ArsenlC
3-40
-------
and the Adminlstrator of EPA in correspondence pertainlng to Fallon,
Nevada, expressed doubts about the validlty of the Tsenq study and
other studles relled on for the CAG potency factor for arsenlC
ingestion. (ARCO)
Response: EPA acknovledges these positions taken by the Agency.
Hovever, the Risk Assessment Forum has addressed and resolved these
concerns in developlng the revised CAG potency factor for arsenic
ingestion. The above-referenced documents have, therefore, been
superceded by a nev agency position based upon nev information.
5.
Commen t :
EPA has taken
a totally different position vlth respect to
the national drinking vater program and
soil and drlnking vater addressed by EPA under
This is inconslStent. (ARCO)
arsenic regulated under
arsenic in contamlnated
CERCLA at Hill Creek.
Response: The comparison of total ingested arsenic dose and risk ln
Hill Creek to the MCL and the proposed RHCL (HCLG) at Mill Creek is
inappropriate for the reasons discussed belovo
a.
Comparison of sOll contamination to the MCL for arsenlC is
inappropnate. EPA's "Superfund Public Health Evaluation Manual"
(page 58, ICF, October 1986) states that "ARARs should correspond
to the medium (e.g., air, vater) for vhich they vere developed and
must be applicable or relevant and appropriate for site
conditions." MCLs are clearly not applicable to soil
contamination. MCLs are required by lav to reflect the
technologlcal and economic feasibility of removing the contamlnant
from the vater. (See section 1412(b)(4) of SDVA and page 58 of
Superfund Public Health Evaluatlon Manual.) Such consideratlons
are clearly not "relevant and appropriate to soil contaminatlon at
Hill Creek. Technical and cost conslderations of drinklng vater
treatment are simply not relevant to soil contamination. In
addition, the technIcal and economic feasibility of soil removal
are not a slgnlficant issue at Mill Creek.
In addltlon, SARA and the NCP allov identIficatIon of cleantlP
goals that attain or exceed ARARs (sectlon 121(d) of SARA. toO
C.F.R. sectlon 300.68(1) and 50 Fed. Reg. 47919, Nov. 20, 1985).
3-41
-------
b.
As noted earlier, a proposed RHCL (HCLG) for arsenic vas publlshed
on November 13, 1985. This proposal vas folloved by a January 9.
. 1986, Science Advisory Board recommendation and letter from the
EPA Administrator regarding Fallon, Nevada. These documents all
raised issues concernlng the supporting studies for the old CAG
potency factor for arsenic. These documents and proposals vere
all pre-decisional and do not represent f1nal EPA pOS1tions on
arsenic carc1nogen1c1ty. The draft Risk Assessment Forum report
supersedes these statements. In addition, the RHCL for drinking
vater, llke the HCL, 1S not relevant and appropriate for soils.
6.
Comment:
EPA has not enforced HCL violations at communities around
the U.S. vhere varlances and exemptions have been granted.
(ARCO)
Response: Variances granted under section 1415 of SDVA are granted
only vhere there is poor ray source vater vhich cannot meet an MCL
~fter application of the best treatment technology, treatment
techniques, or other means Vh1Ch EPA finds are available, taklng cost
into conslderat10n. Exempt10ns granted under section 1416 of SDVA are
granted only vhere, due to compelling factors (including economic
factors), a vat~r system is unable to comply vith the HCL.
Variances and exemptions can only be granted upon a flnding of no
unreasonable risk to health, upon establishment of a compliance
schedule to come into compllance vith the MCL, and mitigation measures
such a medical mon1toring, alternative vater supplies, etc., to
protect health durlng the limited duratlon of the varlances and
exemptions. See "Guidance for the Issuance of Variances and
Exemptions" (Hay 1979, Office of Drinking Vater, VSG 64).
In additlon, the unique factors pertaining to EPA and State SDVA
enforcement discret10n at individual community vater supplies are not
related to or relevant to CERCLA or Hill Creek, Hontana, problems.
3-42
-------
3.2.2
APPLICABLE OR RELEVANT AND APPROPRIATE REQUIREMENTS (ARARS)
Role of ARAR'S 1n General
1.
Comment: The overr1ding goal of SARA is
environment (sectlon 121(d)(1) of SARA).
by the release or threatened release" are
remedial activ1tles at a site, regardless
requirements are deemed to be the proper
protection of health and the
The "circumstances presented
the foundations of all
of WhlCh Federal or State
ARARs .
(ARCO)
Response: ARCO is correct 1n indicat1ng that section 121(d)(1) of
SARA is an overr1d1ng goal. Section 121(d)(1) may support more
stringent clean-up goals than ARARs. Subparagraph 121(d)(2)(A) of
SARA provides that a remedlal act10n selected by EPA must at least
attain ARARs. Paragraph 121(d)(4) sets forth lim1ted expections to
that requirement.
2.
Comment: EPA must dec1de whether to permanently relocate the
residents of M1ll Creek, Montana, before chooslng ARARs for Mill
Creek.
(ARCO)
Response: Permanent relocat1on is only one remedial alternat1ve
considered by EPA. EPA also evaluated other alternatives, including
alternatives for Var10US degrees of cleanup of the community of M1ll
Creek. The National Contingency Plan ("NCP"), at 40 C.F.R.
subsections 300.68(e), (f), (g). (h), and (i) requires that all
remedial alternatives addressed in an RI/FS be evaluated for
compliance with ARARs. This requires preliminary identif1cation of
ARAIs for purposes of the RI/FS analysis. ARARs associated with
permanent relocat1on have been determined in the ROD. ARARs
associated with permanent remedies will be f1nally determ1ned 1n
future operable un1ts and RODs.
3-43
-------
3.
Comment: SARA states that only promulgated requirements of general
app~icabillty may quallfy as State ARARs. (ARCO)
Response:
EPA agrees Ylth this comment.
4.
Comment: EPA must analyze the purpose for yhich a requlrement yas
designed in evaluating a potential ARAR. (ARCO)
Response: EPA must ldentlfy "applicable" requirements as ARARs if
they otheryise qualify. EPA agrees that it must look to the purpose
of "relevant and approprlate" requirements yhen evaluating them.
Surface Vater Requirements
5.
Comment: The Montana surface yater quality numerical standards
specified in Table 3.2-1 of the draft FS are ~ specifled in the
State yater quality standards regulatlons. The Federal yater quality
criteria are only used as gUldellnes by the State in establishlng
permit effluent llmltatlons. (ARCO)
Response: EPA is evaluating yhether State regulatlons at subsection
16.20.618(3) ARM merely establish Federal yater quality criteria as
guidelines or adopt them as instream criteria as a matter of State
lay. As a practical matter, it appears that the State interprets
Federal water quallty criteria to be guidelines. See ARARs analysls
attached to August 27. 1987 letter from John Vardell (EPA) to Jack
Davis (ARCO) (hereinafter "EPA's ARARs analysis"); 50 Fed. Reg. 47919,
Nov. 20, 1985 and 52 Fed. Reg. 8706, March 19, 1987.
6.
Comment: The State-adopted Federal yater quallty crlterla are only
guidelines under State lay and, therefore, are not ARARs, and maximum
contamlnant levels ("MCLs") are legally applicable State ARARs
(ARCO)
3-44
-------
Response:
EPA clar1fies that MCts apply under State lav only after
conventional treatment of the vater.
above.
Also, see response to Comment ~5
7.
Commen t :
If "legally applicable"
standards exist, EPA cannot
identify more str1ngent "relevant and appropriateh requirements as
ARARs . (ARCa )
Response: EPA d1sagrees v1th th1S comment. Remedial actions must
attain all appl1cable or relevant and appropriate requirements unless
a waiver under sect10n 121(d)(4) of SARA is approved by EPA.
8.
Comment: The State nondegradation requirements cannot be an ARAR for
,Hill Creek because they go veIl beyond a concern for public health and
the environment. (ARCO)
Response: EPA bel1eves that the State nondegradation requ1rements are
not an ARAR for M1ll Creek because the only potential sources of
discharge into the stream of Mill Creek are non-point sources, and
these viII be adequately addressed by best management practices. See
EPA's ARARs analysis.
Ground Vater Requlrements
9.
Commen t :
ARca summar1zed and characterized Montana's ground water
requirements .
MCts are the State ARARs.
(ARCa)
Response: EPA concurs with ARCa's analysis, as discussed elsevhere in
EPA's responses to ARCa comments and 1n EPA's ARARs analysis.
Bovever, EPA has identified a more stringent Federal health based
performance goal for drinking vater at the tap. EPA also addressed
nondegradation requirements for ground vater in EPA's ARARs analys1s
3-45
-------
Hard Rock Soil GUldellnes
.
10.
Comment: ARCO analyzed the State reclamation program's "Hard Rock
Soil Guidelines" and concluded that they are not ARARs. (ARCO)
Response: EPA concurs vith ARCQ's reasoning and conclusion. Hovever,
EPA viII consider the guidelines as another "Criteria, Advisory,
Guidance, or Standard to be Considered."
Perennial Streams and Floodplains
11.
Comment: No Federal counterpart exists to the Montana floodplaln and
floodvay regulatory program (MCA Section 76-5-101, et seq.) in any
statute listed in clause 121(d)(2)(A)(i) of SARA. Therefore, no
comparison can be made concernlng stringency. The Montana perennlal
stream protectlon program (MCA Section 75-7-101, et seq.) is not more
strlngent than the analogous Federal dredge and fill program created
by Section 404 of the Clean Vater Act. (ARCQ)
Response: The federal Floodplain Management Executive Order (E.O.
11988) applies to CERCLA activities and is analogous to the State
floodplain and floodvay management program. This Executive Order is
also incorporated into the Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines (40 CFR Part
230). Hovever, the State requirements are not more stringent than the
Federal. EPA agrees vlth ARCO that the State perennial stream
protection program is not more stringent than the Section 404 program.
EPA also does not believe the State program is more stringent than the
Protection of Vetlands Executive Order (EO 11990) vhich also applies
to CERCLA activlties.
See EPA's ARARs analysis.
Vater VeIls and Use
12.
Comment: ARCO analyzed the State reqUlremen ts and concluded tha t the',
are not properly ARARs. (ARCO)
3-46
-------
Response: EPA concurs Y1th ARCO's analys1s and conclus1ons. HOJe~er
EPA did identify yater yell construction standards at ARM Sect10n
36.21.601, et seq. as State ARARs. See EPA's ARARs analysis.
Solid and Hazardous ~aste
13.
Comment: The State's hazardous waste statutory and regulatory
requirements for hazardous waste are identical to Federal RCRA
Subtitle C requirements. (ARCO)
Response: EPA concurs with the analysis and conclusion. EPA has
responded to ARCO's cr1ticism of Federal RCRA Subtitle C closure
requirements elsewhere.
EPA has evaluated the State's solid waste
management requ1rements separately and concluded that they are not
more strlngent than Federal requirements that are "applicable or
relevant and appropr1ate" for Mill Creek.
Air Emissions
14.
Comment: The State amb1ent air quality standard for Total Suspended
Particulate (TSP) at ARM Section 16.8.821 is more strlngent than the
Federal Primary National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for TSP
at 50 CFR Sectlon 50.6 and less stringent than the Federal Secondary
NAAQS for TSP at 40 CFR Section 50.7. The Secondary NAAQS cannot be
an ARAR because it is based on welfare rather than publ1C health
considerations.
(ARCO)
Response: On July 1, 1987, the former Federal Primary and Secondary
NAAQS were superseded by the new PM10 Primary and Secondary NAAQS for
particulate matter less than or equal to 10 mlcrometers 1n diametet
(See 52 Fed. Reg. 24634, July 1, 1987). The new PH10 Prlmarv and
Secondary standards are ldentical. ARCO's comments on the pre-PMIO
standards are therefore, no longer relevant. The state total
3-47
-------
suspended partlculate standard at ARM Section 16.8.821 lS a part of
the Federally approved and enforceable State Implementation Plan (SIP)
and is, therefore, a potential Federal ARAR. There is insufflclent
data at thlS tlme to evaluate vhether the PM10 NAAQS or the State
standard lS more strlngent so EPA has identifled both as Federal ARARs
for Mill Creek.
See EPA's ARARs analysis.
Underground Storage Tanks
15.
Comment: State and Federal regulations for implementing the Federal
and State Underground Storage Tank programs have not been promulgated.
It is, therefore, imposslble to comment on vhether State requirements
are properly ARARs. (ARCO)
Response: The only State and EPA regulations for underground storage
tanks promulgated by EPA to date pertain to notification requirements
and interim prohibitlons for nev tanks. These do not fit the
circumstances at Mll1 Creek. Regulatlons for tank closure and
corrective action have not yet been promulgated. There are,
therefore, presently no State or Federal ARARs for Mill Creek for
underground storage tanks.
Septic Tank Pumpers and Dlsposal of Septage
16.
Comment: ARM sections 16.14.811 and 16.14.812 appear to be State
requirements in addition to Federal ARARs, but it is impossible to say
if they are ARARs until lt is determined vhether septage vill be
encountered durlng remedlal action at Hll1 Creek. (ARCO)
Response: EPA agrees vith ARCO's reasoning and conclusion that ARM
sections 16.14.811 and 16.14.812 are State requirements in addition to
Federal ARARs. EPA viII consider them to be State ARARs 1f septage ]~
encountered under appropriate Clrcumstances during the course of
remedlal actlon.
3-48
-------
Junk Vehicles
17.
Comment: The shlelding provlslons of ARM section 16.14.201(1) are
State requirements ''In addltion to" Federal ARARs. (ARCa)
Response: EPA concurs with ARCa's reasoning and concludes that the
shielding provlsions will be considered State ARARs if junk vehicles
must be collected and disposed of in conjunction with remedial
actions. EPA also considers the disposal of junk vehicles in a "motor
vehicle graveyard" as deflned at MCA subsection 75-10-522 to be a
State ARAR.
ARARs in Hill Creek Draft RIfFS
18.
Comment 2.8:
do not eXlst.
Cleanup standards for arsenic and heavy metals in sOlIs
(ARCa)
Response: ARca lS correct that there are no nationally applicable,
uniform numerlcal ambient cleanup standards for arsenic and heavy
metals in sOlI. However, through the use of a risk-based approach to
identifying "relevant and appropnate" RCRA Subtitle C closure
requirements through the exercise of best professional judgment (50
Fed. Reg. 47919, Nov. 20, 1985), slte-speciflc soil cleanup goals may
be established. This lS a pure rlsk-based approach within the general
framework of RCRA Subtitle C closure requirements. See also 52 Fed.
Reg. 8706, March 19, 1987 and EPA's ARARs analysis.
19.
COllllent 2.8:
"Relevant and appropriate" requirements do not dlrectly
fit the case at hand.
(ARCa)
Response: EPA's flex1ble approach to tailoring RCRA Subt1tle C
closure "relevant and appropr1ate" requirements for so11 contam1nat10n
3-49
-------
in Mill Creek dlrectly flt the case at hand.
analyslS .
See EPA's ARARs
20.
Comment 2.B.1:
Mlnlng vastes are not currently regulated under
Subtitle D of RCRA.
(ARCO)
Response: Minlng vastes are currently regulated under Subtitle D.
See section 1004(27) of RCRA and defini tions of "solid vaste" at 40
C.F.R. subsection 257.2. See response to Comment #3 in Sectlon 3.2.3
General Comments Concerning Mill Creek, Montana, Draft Feasibility
Study, Supplemental Legal Concerns.
21.
Comment 2.B.2:
Sectlon 264.228 is not relevant because it addresses
surface impoundments, applies to higher concentratlons (of arsenic,
etc.?), and does not provlde for removal and replacement of soil.
(ARCO)
Response: Using a flexible, rlsk-based approach, EPA may use best
professional Judgment to select "relevant and appropriate" RCRA
Subtitle C closure requlrements. 40 C.F.R. sections 264.28 and
264.310 allov optlons of complete removal of hazardous vaste or
partial removal vlth capping of the remaining hazardous vastes. An
18-inch cap over remaining contaminated soil in Mill Creek is
consistent vith this approach. See response to Comment #9 in Section
3.2.3 General Comments Concerning Mill Creek, Montana, Draft
Feasibllity Study, Supplemental Legal Concerns.
22.
Comment 2.B.2:
(AlCO)
No justification for 18-inch cap is given in addendum.
Response: Such justlflcation is detailed on pages 24 and 25 of
October 31, 1986, EPA comm€nts on the draft FS report and summaLlzed
on pages 4, 9, and 10 of the RIfFS supplement.
3-50
-------
23.
Comment 2.8.2: Selective sodd1ng of h1ghly contam1nated areas 1S
consistent with 40 CFR section 264.228. (ARCO)
Response:
effective
rema1ning
Select1ve sodd1ng is not as technically reliable and
over the long term in preserving an adequate cap over
contamination as an 18-inch soil cover because of
phytotoxicity problems with "thinner" caps and a high risk of
incidental d1sturbance of thinner caps by normal human activ1t1es
(gardening, etc.).
24.
Comment 2.8.2: EPA should follow the risk-based approach 1t followed
at the Crystal Chem1cal slte at H111 Creek. The Crystal Chemical site
was in a highly populated area, and H1l1 Creek is not. (ARCO)
Response: EPA has followed the r1sk-based approach as described in
the Crystal Chemical discusslon in the NCP preamble (50 Fed. Reg.
47923, Nov. 20, 1985). The Crystal Chemical site is located in an
industrial park. The commun1ty of H1l1 Creek is a residential area.
The exposure of residents to contaminated soil is a more immediate
problem in Hill Creek than at the Crystal Chemical site. Note: EPA
is no longer relY1ng on the Crystal Chemical preamble discussion other
than as a general 111ustration of how to identify "relevant and
appropriate" RCRA closure requi~ements for contaminated soils because
a Record of Decision (ROD) has not yet been signed for the Crystal
Chemical slte.
25.
Comment 2.8.2: 40 C.F.R. section 264.310 applies only to hazardous
waste sites. EPA should not apply all of section 264.310 to Hill
Creek. (ARCO)
Response: 40 C.F.R. section 264.310 requ1rements may be "relevant and
appropriate" at Hill Creek. See EPA's ARARs Analysls for a full
explanation. EPA dld not apply all of section 264.310 to M1ll Creek.
only the "relevant and appropr1ate" requ1rements. EPA agrees that
3-51
-------
long-term covering 1S cons1stent with the "relevant and appropr1ate
req~irements" of sect10n 264.310 but disagrees vith ARCO over the
extent of the requ1red cover.
26.
Comment 2.B.3: The ARAR for dr1nking water in Hill Creek should be
the HCLG of arsenic of 50 ug/l. (ARCO)
Response: The HCLG (RHCL) for arsenic is only proposed at this time.
EPA failed to note this in the RIfFS supplement. As noted in EPA's
ARARs analysis, EPA has deferred evaluation of vater quality cr1ter1a
as ARARs for drink1ng vater at the tap pending development of EPA
policy for implement1ng subparagraph 121(d)(2)(B) of SARA and has,
instead, identified a health-based performance goal for arsenic in
drink1ng water.
27.
Comment 2.B.3:
EPA should consider the latest information available
in establ1sh1ng a cleanup level based on vater quality criteria.
(ARCO)
Response: See response to Comment #9 above and EPA's ARARs analysis.
Also, see response to Comments #11, #12, and #13 in Section 3.2.3
General Comments Concern1ng Hill Creek, Hontana, Draft Feasibility
Study. Supplemental Legal Concerns.
28.
Comment 2.B.4: ARCO agrees vith EPA that 10-6 is not an ARAR.
Achieving a cleanup primary target of 10-6 for arsen1C and skin cancer
doesn't take into account the mortality rate. (ARCO)
Response: Although 10-6 is not an ARAR, it is a valid means of
implementing sect10n 121(d)(1) of SARA. A risk level of 10-6 is
identifies as a pr1mary target for cleanup 1n EPA's Publ1C Health
Evaluat10n Hanual (October. 1986) on page 125. See response to
Comment #1 in EPA's response in Section 3.2.3 General Comments
Concerning the M1ll Creek, Montana. Draft Feas1b1lity Study,
3-52
-------
Supplemental
Endangerment
mortallty.
Legal Concerns. See response to ARCO's comments on
Assessment for a d1scussion of morbld1ty versus
29.
Comment 2.B.4: Background levels of arsenic are cleanup goals and not
ARARs. RCRA contalns no basis to require cleanup to background
levels. (ARCO)
Response: EPA preliminarily identified background as the cleanup goal
for the purposes of the RIfFS analysis because of the elevated risks
associated vith even background levels of arsen1C 1n soil. These
risks vere calculated using a more recent EPA posit10n on arsen1C
toxicity than vas available vhen the Crystal Chemical site vas
discussed in the NCP preamble. This cleanup level vas incorporated
into the RCRA "storage" closure optlon as a means of defining removal
of all contaminated s01ls." See response to Comment #9 in Section
3.2.3 General Comments Concernlng Hill Creek, Hontana, Draft
Feaslb1llty Study" (see also 52 Fed. Reg. 8706, Harch 19, 1987). This
is cons1stent vith the flex1ble approach to RCRA closure for
contaminated soils illustrated in the NCP preamble discussion of the
Crystal Chemical site. In addltion, the NCP preamble discussion of
Crystal Chemical indicated that "storage" closure could have been
implemented by cleanup to background, even assuming a 100 ppm. arsenic
actIon level vas appropriate (50 Fed. Reg. 47923, Nov. 20, 1985).
30.
Comment 2.B.5: Does EPA intend to relocate people only to locations
where no arsenic can be detected in drinking water? (ARCO)
Response: EPA v1ll take steps to ensure that the health of any
residents relocated pursuant to CERCLA authorlty is adequately
protected.
31.
Comment 2.B.7: The State's nondegradation policy lS more strlngent
than EPA's ant1degradatlon POllCY because lt 1S more speclf1c. (ARCO)
3-53
-------
Response: The Federal regulatlons at 40 CFR sectlon 131.12 addressing
antidegradatlon are not a Federal ARAR because they are not dlrectly
enforceable nor are they expressly cited in section 121(d)(2) of SARA.
Therefore, the State nondegradation policy is not properly analyzed as
being more strlngent than the Federal requirements for purposes of
CERCLA. It is more properly analyzed as belng "in addition to"
Federal requirements. In any event, EPA has concluded the State's
non-degradation policy wlll not be an issue at Hill Creek because any
non-point sources would be adequately addressed by best management
practices. See EPA's ARARs analysls and response to comment #32
immedlately below.
32.
Comment 2.B.7: ARH sectlon 16.20.701(b)(7) specifies that where
pollution occurs from non-point sources, surface water quality
standards vlolatlons from non-polnt sources are not consldered
degradation where reasonable land, sOll, and water management
practlces have been applled. Vere such measures to be applled in Mill
Creek, the State non-degradatlon policy would not apply. (ARCO)
Response: EPA agrees that where reasonable
management practices are applied, the State
do not apply.
land, soil, and water
nondegradation provisions
33.
Comment 2.B.7: Even lf nondegradatlon were consldered "relevant and
appropriate," only activities after December 17, 1982, which would
cause exceedances of water quality standards would have to be managed
under the non-degradation policy. (ARCO)
Response: EPA does not agree. The purpose of the State's
nondegradation requirements is to protect water that is currently of
higher quality than requlred by State standards.
3-54
-------
34.
Comment 2.B.7: The
than EPA's modlfled
section 121 of SARA
considered further.
State's grc~nd water standards are less strlngenr
water quality crlterla for arsenic. Therefore,
suggests that State standards do not need to be
(ARCO)
Response: EPA has deferred the question of whether water quality
criterla are drlnklni water ARARs as noted ear11er. EPA has instead
preliminarily identified a health-based performance goal for purposes
of the RI/FS analysis that is more stringent than the MCL for arsenlC.
See EPA's ARARs analysls.
35.
Comment 2.B.8: MCA section 28-4-336(7) is not applicable to Mill
Creek because the Anaconda Smelter and Ml11 Creek are not mlning
activities.
(ARCO)
Response:
EPA agrees with thlS comment.
36.
Comment 2.B.8: The requirements of MCA section 82-4-336(7) are not
"relevant and appropriate" because the purposes of the Montana Mined
Land Reclamatlon law lS aesthetic and economic rather than protection
of health or the environment.
(ARCO)
Response: EPA does not agree with ARCO's reasonlng or its conclusion.
The Hontana Metal Hine Rec1amatlon Act (MCA section 82-4-301. et seq.)
clearly addresses environmental values, although not in the same
manner or degree as CERCLA. ~ MCA 55 82-4-335(c), 82-4-335(h).
82-4-335(j), 82-4-336(4), 82-4-336(5), 82-4-336(6), and 82-4-336(9).
The requirements of HCA section 82-4-336(7) are "relevant and
appropriate". However, EPA does believe that HCA section 82-4-336(7)
15 not more strlngent than Federal requirements. The language of thlS
provision is a general narrative standard that cannot be easlly
compared to more specific Federal and State ARARs. EPA concludes tha'
thlS general narratlve standard wl11 be satlsfied if the more speclflc
Federal ARARs are compIled wlth.
,
3-55
-------
37.
Comment 2.8.8:
The State Hard Rock SOll Guidelines are not ARARs
because they were not promulgated.
(ARCD)
Response:
EPA agrees w1th this comment.
However, EPA w1ll consider
these requirements as guidance in its evaluation.
38.
Comment 2.8.9: State hazardous and solid vaste laws are not more
stringent than EPA's. If underground storage tanks, septic tanks, or
junk vehicles are encountered during remedial action at Hill Creek,
the relevant State laws are "applicable or relevant and appropriate",
(ARCD)
Response: EPA concurs with this response, except that the State's
current underground storage tank requ1rements are not pertlnent to
Hill Creek.
39.
Comment 2.8.10: The State's 24-hour standard for total suspended
partlculate ("TSP") matter is more stringent than the primary Nat10nal
Ambient Air Quallty Standard (NAAQS). (ARCD)
Response: See response to comment #14 in Section 3.2.2 Applicable or
Relevant and Appropriate Requirements (ARARs). Also see EPA's ARARs
analyslS .
40.
Remedlal activlties ln Hill Creek would not be
Comment 2.8.10:
"stationary sources," so the State TSP standard will not apply.
(ARCD)
Response: EPA d1sagrees. The State and Federal air pollut1on
standard and performance goals 1dent1fied ln EPA's ARARs analys1s ~111
apply.
3-56
-------
41.
42.
Comment 2.B.10: No State air qua~ity permits should be requlred for
remedlal actlvltles in MIll Creek. (ARCO)
Response:
EPA agree~ with thIS comment (section 121(e) of SARA).
Comment 2.B.11: The use of EPA's 1980 water quality criteria for
arsenic for drinking water 15 based partially on ingestion of fish and
shellfish from contamInated surface vater. This criteria should be
revised vhen applied to ground water for drinking purposes. (ARCO)
Response: See earlIer dlSCUSSlon of EPA's position on water quallty
criteria as a drlnklng vater ARAR.
43.
Comment 2.B.11: The use of the carcinogenic potency factor for
arsenIC based on the Tseng TaIwan study IS inapproprIate as set
in ARCO's comments on the Clement Associates, Inc., Endangerment
forth
Assessment for Mlll Creek.
(ARCO)
Response: EPA has recently revised the Endangerment Assessment for
Hill Creek based on the October 1986 draft Risk Assessment Forum
report on arsenic. See responses to ARCO comments on the Endangerment
Assessment in SectIon 3.1. This revised factor derived from the
October 1986 draft report vas used to identify the RCRA "storage"
closure cleanup pool and the health-based performance goal for
drinking water.
44.
Comment 2.B.12: The MCLs for cadmium and lead are identical to the
vater quality criterIa for lead and cadmium for drinking water.
Therefore, the MCLs for lead and cadmium are "relevant and
appropriate". Because the vater quality for arsenic for drinklng
vater is of questionable technical validlty, the MCL for arsenlC IS
also the proper MCI.
Response:
See earller dlscussion and EPA's ARARs analysIs.
3-57
-------
3.2.3
GENERAL COMMENTS CONCERNING THE MILL CREEK, MONTANA, DRAFT
FEASIBILITY STUDY, SUPPLEMENTAL LEGAL CONCERNS
On-Site Vaste Consolldatlon
1.
Comment: ARCO stated that choice of ARARs based on multiple pathvays
of exposure is flayed on both legal and scientific grounds. This
comment is apparently based upon ARCO's position that the endangerment
assessment has exaggerated risks to residents of Mill Creek so that
only permanent relocatlon is an.available option and that reduce risk
estimates of ARCO vould lead to a limlted cleanup of soils and
drinking
the only
for Hill
vater.
ARCO also states that Maximum Contamlnant Levels are
"appl1cable or relevant and appropnate" requirements (ARARs)
Creek. (ARCO)
Response: EPA has revlsed the EA assessment based upon the October
1986 draft R1Sk Assessment forum "Speclal Report on Ingested Arsenic
and Certain Human Health Effects". Even after this revision
significant risks remain, as indicated in the revised EA and EPA's
response to ARCO's comments on the EA. Selection of permanent
relocation of the resldents is based in large part on the
cost-effectiveness of the remedy and the threat of recontaminatlon
rather than a Judgment that an "extreme" risk justifies the "extreme
remedy of permanent relocatlon". Because resldents are exposed to
hazardous substances along several exposure pathvays in Mill Creek, it
is appropriate and necessary to consider the cumulatlve effects of
dose received through those pathvays in preliminarily identifYlng
cleanup goals for the site for purposes of conductlng the RIfFS 1n
order to ensure that cost-effective remedies that are adequately
protective of human health and the envlronment are evaluated.
Consideration of such site-specific factors is consistent vlth rh~
overridlng cleanup ~oal ln sectlon 121(d)(1) of SARA. ThlS approacn
3-58
-------
is also consistent v1th £PA guidance (pages 113 to 123), Superfund
Public Health £valuat1on Manual. October 1986.
Identlfication of a health-based performance goal for drinking vater
at the tap 1n lleu of the MCL for arsen1C based in part on the overall
10-6 primary target and of multiple pathvay exposure is also
appropriate. See £PA's ARARs analysis and Section 121(d)(1) of SARA.
2.
Comment:
It is premature to select ARARs for on-site consolidation.
(ARCO)
Response: On-s1te consol1dat1on of vaste through moving of
eontam1nated soils to the tailings ponds may create add1tional
releases of hazardous substances in the tailings areas. Fugitive dust
emlssions from the freshly dug, loose contaminated soil may occur 1f
it is not covered. Surface runoff problems may occur. It is
appropriate at th1S time to evaluate and preliminarily identify ARARs
for purposes of conduct1ng an RIfFS for the interim storage of piles
of contaminated sOlI pending selection of a final remedy 1n the
selected storage area.
3.
Comment: 40 C.F.R. Part 257 is not a proper ARAR for on-site
consolidation of vaste. Part 257 is not a "standard requirement,
criteria, or llmitatlon" under sect10n 121(d)(2)(A)(i) of SARA because
part 257 requirements are guidelines. (ARCO)
Response: 40 C.F.R. Part 257 is identified in the National
Contingency Plan as a potential ARAR. Part 257 is a promulgated
regulation, implementlng the ban on open dumping in Sect10n 4005(a) of
RCRA which may be enforced by any person under Section 7002 of RCRA.
The requirements of 40 C.F.R. Part 257 are, therefore, not just
unenforceable, advisory guidelines, but are "standards, requ1rements.
criteria, or limltat1ons" vlthin the meaning of SARA. See EPA's ARARs
analysis.
3-59
-------
4.
Comment: Part 257 reqUlrements do not fully address mine ~aste
concerns and contaln criteria which are not approprlate for mlnlng
waste. Compllance with part 257 demonstrates adequate protection of
health and the enVlronment (floodplains and ground water). (ARCQ)
Response: These comments seem contradictory. They admit inadequacies
of Subtitle D, but also state that it adequately protects health and
the environment. The definition of "solid waste" at 40 C.F.R. sectlon
257.2 does include mining waste within the definition of "solid
waste". This includes wastes from air pollution control facilities
such as flue dust from smelter emlssions which has contaminated Hill
Creek (40 C.F.R. section 261.4(b)(7) and 45 Fed. Reg. 76618, Nov. 19,
1980). The contaminated soils are contaminated by solid wastes.
However, as acknowledged by EPA at 51 Fed. Reg. 24501 (July 3, 1986),
"Part 257 is dlrected toward municipal and industrial waste and does
not fully address mlning waste concerns." This point is re-emphasized
in the August 19, 1986 POllCY memorandum from Henry L. Longest III,
titled, "Consideratlon of RCRA Requirements in Performing CERCLA
Responses at Hlnlng Vaste Sltes". That is why EPA is undertaklng the
development of a revlsed Subtitle D program for mining waste. As
noted on page 6 of EPA's RIfFS supplement for Hill Creek at paragraph
III.C.a., Part 257 does not adequately address risks posed by releases
of all hazardous substances of concern at Hill Creek into air or
direct contact by resldents. The only provlsions of Part 257 that are
pertinent to Hill Creek are the floodplains, endangered species,
surface water, State Implementation Plan (SIP), and groundwater
. provisions. These provisions are duplicated or supercede by other
AlARs, criteria, advlsorles, and gUldance (E.O. 11988; 16 U.S.C.
section 1531, et seq.; Federal water quallty crlteria; State water
quality standards; Hontana State Implementation Plan (SIP), and
"relevant and appropriate" RCRA Subtitle C closure require~ents)
EPA, therefore, vlll not consider Subt1tle D as a slgnif1cant ARAR fOL
H111 Creek. See EPA's ARARs analysis for further discussion.
3-60
-------
5.
Comment: 40 C.F.R. section 264.251 requlrements for ~aste plles are
not discussed in the RI/FS supplement. The selection of Section
264.251 as a "relevant and appropriate" requirement is premature. A
specific plan for storage must be developed by EPA and ARCO before
this section can be evaluated. (ARCO)
Response: EPA addressed 40 C.F.R. section 264.251 in October 31,
1986, EPA comments on the draft Feasibility Study. ARCO partially
addressed this comment on page 5-32 of the draft FS report. Because
permanent relocatlon vas selected as a remedy, a detailed plan for
storage of contamlnated soils from Hill Creek is not necessary. If
such storage becomes necessary in the future, it is EPA's intention to
use a flexible approach in applying the technically "relevant and
appropriate" requirements of 40 C.F.R. Part 264.251 in addressing
potential releases of hazardous substances along potential exposure
pathvays. (See 50 Fed. Reg. 47919, Nov. 20, 1985). If an exposure
pathvay is not relevant (e.g., groundvater viII not be contaminated by
the storage plle), EPA viII not require that the relevant (e.g.,
groundvater-related) design and operation ("D and 0") requirements of
40 C.F.R. section 264.251 be met. If an exposure pathvay lS relevant
(e.g., fugitlve dust is a problem), EPA viII require that the relevant
(e.g., ai~-pollution-control-related) "D and 0" requirements be met
(e.g., 40 C.F.R. subsection 264.251(f».
6.
Commen t :
RCM "D and 0" requirements cannot be ARARs under sectlon
121 of SARA (statute and legislative history).
endangerment assessment is flavedo (ARCO)
In addltion, the
Response: As descrlbed in the response to Comment ~5 above, EPA ~lll
use a flexible approach in addressing the "D and 0" requlrements of
RCM Subtltle C as "relevant and appropriate" requirements. The',' 101111
be used ~here they are determined to make good technlcal sense uSlng
best professlonal Judgment. ThlS approach lS not inconslstent ~lth
3-61
-------
subparagr~ph 121(d)(4)(D) of SARA. In addition, the waiver proviS10nS'
o.f subparagraph 121(d)(4)(D) are discretlonary ("The Pres1dent !!!!L
select. . . . " (emphasis suppl1ed». The citation to HR Rep. No.
99-253 at page 211-213 does not appear to be relevant to th1S issue.
Those pages addressed dioxin wastes, State requirements for transfer,
and settlement prOV1Sl0ns.
Cleanup at Hill Creek
7.
Comment: Cleanup of the most stringent level for both drinking water
and soil would be 1mproper because the cleanup of soil and water would
eliminate mult1p1e pathways. Only a relaxation of cleanup
requirements on one pathway would warrant more stringent requirements
on the other, and arsenic at HCL levels is necessary for health 50
cleanup of water would necesslate raising soil cleanup levels. (ARCO)
Response: See response to comment A.1 and response to arsenIc
micronutrient lssue 1n EPA's response to ARCO's comments on the
EA in SectIon 3.1.
8.
40 C. F .R. Part 257 guidelines are not "applicable" to M1ll
(ARCO)
Commen t :
Creek.
Response: See response to Comments #3 and #4 in Section 3.2.3. The
soil in Hill Creek was contaminated in part by a solId waste -- flue
dust. However, SubtItle D IS not considered a significant an ARAR, as
discussed earlier.
9.
Comment: 40 C.F.R. Part 264, Subpart G, and sectIons 264.228 and
24.310 are not "relevant and appropriate" requirements for Mill Creek.
This general comment is supported by several supporting comments ~hich
are summarized belo~ ~ith the assoc1ated EPA response. (ARCO)
a.
In determ1n1ng "relevant and appropriateness," the purpose of the
requ1rements should be evaluated. The purpose of RCRA closure
3-62
-------
requ1rements 1S to address contam1~ation from hazardous ~aste
management. (ARCO)
Response:
ARCO's comment 1S addressed to
the question of Yhether the
EPA does not argue that
that portions of them are
RCRA closure requIrements are app11cable.
they are applicable. It is EPA's posit10n
"relevant and appropriate".
EPA agrees that the purpose should be evaluated. However, ARCO has
evaluated the purpose too narrowly. The purpose of the requirements
is to protect human health and the environment through controlling the
releases ot hazardous yastes, includ1ng hazardous constItuents, to the
enVIronment along exposure pathways (aIr, surface water, ground water,
and dIrect contact). ArsenIc, lead, and cadmium are hazardous
constituents listed in 40 C.F.R. Part 260, Appendix VIII, as well as
hazardous substances regulated under CERCLA. It is not necessary for
the contaminated soils or theIr constituents to be hazardous wastes in
order for SubtItle C to be "relevant and appropriate".
The "relevance
and appropr1ateness" of 40 C.F.R. Part 264, Subpart G, and sect10ns
264.228 and 264.310 for addressing these substances can be evaluated
in a flexible manner through the exercise of technical best
profess10nal Judgment 1n order to determine if they were intended to
apply to circumstances similar to those 1n Hill Creek (SO Fed. Reg.
47919, Nov. 20, 1985). USIng the flexible-pathway-or1ented approach,
it is w1thin EPA's authority to Identify and mod1fy, if necessary, the
"D and 0" RCRA closure requirements referenced as "relevant and
approprIate" requirements for Hill Creek.
In the ARAR analys1s attached to the August 27, 1987 dIrect1ve to ARCO
for preparing the final RIfFS reports for Hill Creek, EPA describes
the two "closure optIons" ava1lable under 40 C.F.R. sect10ns 264.228
and 264.310; 1) "storage" closure under 40 C.F.R. paragraph
264.228(a)(a) and 2) "d1sposal" closure under 40 C.F R. paragraphs
264.228(a)(2) and 264.310(a). EPA has determined that a "storage"
closure such as that descr1hed 1n 40 C.F.R. paragraph 264.228(a)(1)
3-63
-------
vould require excavatlon of contaminated soils to background levels.
See 52 Fed. Reg. 8706, Harch 19, 1987. Because human or other
receptors of the groundvater pathvay are not threatened by
contaminated soils in Hill Creek but human receptors of the air and
direct contact pathvays are, a modified cover or "cap" derived from
closure requirements at 40 C.F.R. paragraphs 264.228(a)(2) and
264.310(a) vas identified as the "disposal" closure RCRA ARAR. An
18-inch cap vas deemed necessary to provide adequate protection from
casual disturbances by residents and to support a vegetative cover
needed to prevent vind and vater erosion from exposure and
transporting the remuning buried contaminated soil. The "cap" vould
be comprised of "clean" soil vith arsenic at background levels in
order to achieve EPA's multiple pathvay risk-reduction primary target
of 10-6. Note: The presence or absence of institutional controls
affects the "rellabllity" rating of the "disposal" closure option.
b.
RCRA closure requirements are not "relevant and appropriate" for
areavide problems such as H1l1 Creek. (ARCO)
Response: The contamlnatlon of soil in Hill Creek vas caused by stack
and fugitive flue dust emission. Regardless of hov arsenic vas
transported to the soil and hov extensive the contaminated area 1S, it
presents very similar public health and environmental problems to
arsen1C as a hazardous constitutuent under 40 C.F.R. Part 60, Appendix
VIII. Hodlfied "relevant and appropriate" RCRA Subtitle C
requirements have been preliminarily identified in a flexible manner
based on the site-specific nature of the risks rather than through
strict literal application of Subtitle C. EPA is not currently
addressing regional ground vater contamination in Hill Creek, and 160
acres does not compare to 210 roadside m11es of PCB contamination.
c.
Mill Creek 1S not a surface impoundment or a landfill. so RCRA
closure "D and 0" requ1rements are not "relevant and appropr1ate"
(ARCO)
3-64
-------
Response: See NCP preamble discussion of flexible approach for
analogizing soil contamination to surface impoundments or landfills at
Crystal Chemical site (50 Fed. Reg. 47923, Nov. 20, 1985). Off-site
soil contam1nation at Hill Creek is not a surface impoundment or
landfill.
d.
RCRA closure standards are not "relevant and appropriate" for
mining sites because EPA determined they are "technically
infeasible or economically impractical". (ARCO)
Response: EPA determined that, ". . . if applied universally.
on a national basis, certain Subtitle C requirements such as ". . .
closure. . . standards. . . may be technically infeasible or
economically impractical to implement because of the quantity and
nature of vaste 1nvolved" in the recent RCRA mine vaste regulatory
determination (51 Fed. Reg. 24500, July 3, 1986). This determination
vas national 1n scope and does not consider the site-specific
conditions at Hill Creek. The modified approach to "closure"
discussed above is ta1lored to provide only environmentally necessary
controls vhich address only the actual documented environmental
and health risks in the most efficient manner. ARCa has not argued or
demonstrated that complete excavation of contaminated soil ("disposal
closure") or partial excavatjon and contaminated sOlI ("storage
closure") in H1ll Creek as described above and in EPA's ARAR analys1s
is "technically infeasible" or "econom1cally impractical." EPA may
consider "relevant and appropr1ate" technical requirements of Subtitle
C of RCRA Vh1Ch appear to be technically feasible at mining sites
(memorandum from Henry L. Longest, III, to Regional Administrators
. ~
dated August 19, 1986, and titled "Consideration of RCRA Requ1rements
in Performing CERCLA Responses at Hining Yaste Sites").
"
e.
The choice of background as a cleanup goal is arbitrary and
capric10us under RCRA. EPA should fol1ov it approach at th~
Crystal Chem1cal slte and use a rlsk-based approach to esrabllsh
an arsenlC cleanup level. (ARCO)
3-65
-------
Response: EPA you1d 11ke to clarify 1ts position concern1ng
ba~kground as a cleanup goal. The Agency's Superfund Program has
established a 10-6 excess cancer risk as its remedla1 actlon prlmary
target. On a site specific basis the Agency can estab11sh a remedlal
-4 -7
act10n obJect1ve of betyeen 10 and 10 excess cancers. At Hill
Creek the background concentrat1on of arsenic in sOlls is
approximately 9 to 16 m1crograms/gram. This level of arsenic in soil
yields a 1.7 x 10-5 excess cancer risk for the "reasonable maximums
scenario" and 1.7 x 10-6 excess cancer risk for the "average case
scenario". Both of these scenarios yield an excess cancer risk
calculation fa1l1ng betyeen 10-4 and 10-7 excess cancers, and the
"most likely scenario" cancer r1sk is the same as the 10-6 excess
cancer risk goal established by the Agency's Superfund program. In
accordance Y1th the guidance yhich perm1ts site speciflc declsions,
EPA has prellm1narlly 1dentlfied the background soil arsenic
concentrate of approxlmately 9 to 16 m1crograms/gram as the remedial
action objective at Hill Creek.
Background yas prelimlnarily identifled as a cleanup prlmary target
because even background levels do not achieve a carcinogenic risk
level of 10-6 considering the soil ingestion exposure pathyay alone.
The calculated rlsk for lngestion of $oil alone using the maximum
probable exposure scenario yields an excess carsenogenlc risk level of
1.7 x 10-5. This does not even conslder risks from ingestion of
drlnking yater or ingestion of inhaled partlculate matter in phlegm.
Background yas considered a reasonable primary target compared to
cleaning up beyond background in order to achieve 10-6.
As we discussed earlier, there are tvo RCRA closure opt1ons for Mill
Creek vhich satlsfy "relevant and appropriate" RCRA closure
requirements: 1) "storage" closure, lnvo1ving excavatlon and removal
of all contaminated 5011 above background and 2) "disposal" c1c~ure.
invo1vlng partla1 excavatlon of contaminated so11, removal. and
replacement Y1th a cap of "clean" soil.
3-66
-------
Both of these means vould help support EPS's overall slte
risk-reduction primary target of 10-6, although, as noted earller, an
absence of effectl~e instltutlonal controls could adversely affect the
reliabillty ratlng of the dlsposal closure option. The risk
calculations used to establish the action level of background for
arsenic in soils for the "storage" closure option vas establlshed
using the more current EPA positlon from EPA's October 1986 Draft R1Sk
Assessment Forum report on Arsenic. EPA used a risk-based approach
similar to that used at Crystal Chemical, using a more current
EPA position concernlng arsenic toxicity using an overall site risk
reduction prlmary target of 10-6 cancer risk and tailoring it to the
climatic conditions ln Hlll Creek.
f.
EPA lS propoSlng 18 lnches of soil removal and replacement to
support a natlve vegetatlve cap, and not RCRA closure standards.
(ARCO)
Response: Natlve vegetation is necessary to protect the cap from ~lnd
and vater erosion as vell as human actlvlty so that it remains
reliable over the long term in preventing dlrect contact by residents
of Hill Creek. As is descrlbed ln E?A's dlrection to ARCO to finallze
the RI/FS reports and EPA's ARAR analysis, this cap is less than a
"full" RCRA cap because groundvater is not an issue and lS based only
on "relevant and appropnate" RCRA closure requirements. It has been
specially tailored to address site-speclfic conditions.
10.
Co.en t :
EPA should not choose an ARAR for ground vater at thlS time.
(ARCO)
Response: EPA agrees because reglonal ground vater contam1nat1on ~lll
be addressed ln a later operable unit. Hovever, resldents would ha-e
remalned 1n H1ll Creek lf a cleanup alternat1ve vould ha e been
selected and they vould drlnk vater. It lS, therefore. necessary to
evaluate cleanup goals for ARARs for drlnking vater !! the l!2 (rather
3-67
-------
than in the aquifer) so that the evaluatlon of cleanup alternatlves in
the RI/FS vould be complete. EPA cannot 19nore risks posed by arsenlC
1n drink1ng vater.
11.
Comment: Section 121(d)(2)(B)(1) of SARA requires consideration of
"the latest informat10n ava1lable" in evaluating vhether vater quallty
criteria are "relevant and appropriate". EPA d1d not evaluate the
latest information available as noted in the November 13, 1985 Federal
Register notice for proposed RHCL for arsenic. (ARCO)
Response: EPA has deferred further cons1derat1on of vater qual1ty
criteria as a drinking vater ARAR pend1ng development of Agency policy
for implementing Section 121(d)(2)(B) of SARA. EPA has instead
preliminarily 1dent1fied a health based performance goal for arsenlC
that 1S more str1ngent than the MCL for arsenic based on Sect10n
121(d)(1) of SARA and mult1ple pathvays of exposure. See EPA's ARAR
analys1s. Note: EPA inaccurately stated that the proposed RHCL for
arsen1C vas f1nal 1n the December 23, 1986 RI/FS supplement for Mill
Creek.
12.
Commen t :
Creek.
EPA selected zero as the vater quality criteria for Hill
EPA 1S question1ng the applicabil1ty of zero-based standard.
(ARCO)
Response: See response to Comment #11 above. Note, hovever, that in
the December 23, 1986 RI/FS Supplement, EPA did not select zero as the
vater quality criteria for Mill Creek. EPA initially chose 2.2
nanograms per liter because 1t is assoc1ated with a cancer risk of
10-6.
13.
Comment: The leglslative history of SARA
criteria are onl} to be applied if an MCL
the pollutant. (ARCO)
shovs that vater quallty
or HCLG does not
e:nsr for
3-68
-------
Response: See response to Comment #11 above.
14.
Comment: The purpose behind MCLs and RMCLs indlcates the proposed
RMCL or HCL for arsenic should be the cleanup goal for Mill Creek.
MCLG's are set at the level with no known adverse health effects.
HCL's are set as close to MCLGs as feasible using the best technology
and treatment techniques avallable taklng costs into consideration,
and SARA requires consideration of technical feasibility. (ARCO)
Response: The proposed RMCL for arsenic is based on outdated
informatlon and 1nterpretations. The October 1986 draft Risk
Assessment Forum report for arsenic reflects the current EPA posit10n
and indlcates that arsenlC can still pose unacceptable risks of cancer
at low doses and that the evidence of a micronutr1ent role for arsenlC
in humans IS Inconclusive and preliminary at best (see Response to
ARCO comments on Endangerment Assessment). Note: MCLGs (RHCLs) do not
take into account unique, site-specific pathways of exposure in
addltlon to drlnklng water such as Ingest10n of s011 contaminated by
arsenic from smelter emissions.
ARCO argues that the HCL for arsenlC was established taklng 1nto
account the best technology and treatment techniques available and
technlcal feas1bllity and that the MCt should, therefore, be selected
as the standard. ARCO has not demonstrated that a health based water
quallty cleanup performance primary target as identlfied in EPA's
ARARs analysis or the equivalent modified water quality criteria
proposed In EPA's December 23, 1986 RIfFS supplement cannot be
achieved for Hill Creek. In fact, the FS has identifIed alternative
vater supplles as a relatively low-cost and feaslble means of
achieving the water quallty cleanup goal at the dr1nkIng water tap In
Hill Creek.
15.
Comment: The pteamble to the NCP indlcates that Safe Drlnklng Vatet
Act requlrements are ARARs for drlnklng water rather than vater
3-69
-------
quality criterla. HCLs are listed as potential ARARs, and MCLGs and
water quallty crlterla are only "other federal crlterla, advIsorIes,
and gUldance and state standards to be consldered." State vater
quality criterla are not enforceable. (ARCO)
Response: As acknowledged by ARCO, SARA has superceded the November
20, 1985 NCP to the extent that it is inconsistent with SARA. See
response to Comment #11 (above) and EPA's ARARs analysls.
3-70
-------
3.3
COMMUNITY CONCERNS
EPA's Activities
1.
Concern: Some H1ll Creek residents have raised concerns about ~hy EPA
decided to study the area in the first place and ~hy it has taken them
so long to get th1ngs done. Many residents said they have lived 1n
the area for a long time ~ith no health problems. No~ that the
smelter is closed, they believe that the air and the enV1ronment are
improving naturally. Some county residents also bel1eve that EPA'~
presence has negatively affe~ted property values and may be
discourag1ng small business owners from moving to the area. Both the
notoriety from med1a coverage of the area and the limitations of the
Superfund program are v1ewed as hamper1ng local econom1C development.
Response: EPA 1S requ1red by law to protect the health and welfare of
residents liv1ng near hazardous waste sites on the National Priorities
List. The RIfFS process 1S des1gned to find the most appropriate yet
cost-effect1ve Solut10n to the risks that these sites present. EPA
extended the study period because of the serious issues that arose
regarding the health effects of arsenic contamination, especially for
small children. On a short-term basis, the study process requires EFA
to be very act1ve in the Mill Creek area. EFA suggests that long-term
benef1ts, especially for those local res1dents determined to be at
risk, will substant1ally outweigh the short-term problems and
inconveniences that may be associated with its efforts.
2.
Concern: A number of residents asked EFA to define its program
objectives in the area. Residents asked how effective the cleanup can
be, given the extent of contam1nation. They believe EFA cannot afford
to clean up the ent1re area. Yet, ~ith too little cleanup. the area
viII rema1n unsafe for elther agrlcultural or residentlal pl1rpo~~s.
3-71
-------
Response: The primary focus of EPA's efforts 1n M1ll Creek 1S
protect1on of publ1C health. EPA's obJect1Ves for Mlll Creek are
stated 1n the FS Report (p. l-4): "The public health protect1on
remed1al response obJectives for Mill Creek differ bet~een these
categories of remedial alt~rnatives: l} remedial alternatives that
involve res1dents remalning in Hill Creek wlth various levels of clean
up, and 2} the permanent relocation of resldents remedial alternative.
The remedlal response object1ve for "cleanup" alternatives is
permanent protectlon of public health. The remedial response
objective for the permanent relocat1on alternative is permanent
protection of the health of the current residents and supplemented by
interlm controls to mln1mlze short-term publlC health r1sks for
current nonresidents. The Haster RIfFS for the AHC Smelter Slte will
address the longer-term publ1c health and environmental issues
remalnlng after the permanent relocation alternatlve (e.g., reg10nal
ground-water contam1nat1on)."
Negative Impact on Personal L1ves
3.
Concern: Residents expressed a h1gh level of satisfaction with the1r
neighbors and w1th the H1Il Creek community and are concerned about
loosing their lifestyle and the relationship they have had with their
neighbors, ln addltion to the country setting of thelr homes.
Response: The "loss of community" that residents may face when they
are asked to relocate also is of concern to EPA.
Assistance will be provided in plannlng for a move and in finding a
suitable replacement property. If possible, thlS replace~ent propertv
will be found ln the Mill Creek vlclnlty, in an effort to mln1m1ze the
disruptive effect on residents' lives.
4.
Concern:
Some res1dents stated the EPA 1S not sens1t1ve to the
emotional 1mpacts of 1tS re~ed1al efforts on ind1viduals and famil1es.
3-72
-------
Some res1dents also are concerned that they are a "test case" for
other hazardous yaste areas in Montana.
Response: EPA 1S sensitive to the circumstances of Mill Creek
resldents. The Mlll Creek site vas glven high priority among the
Anaconda sites and the remedial action process vas evaluated
thoroughly to make sure that all health and safety concerns yere
addressed. EPA has provided a communlty relations speciallst to
assist with local communlcations and to help residents deal yith a
number of other problems and issues. In addition, EPA will work to
assist residents in plann1ng for and dealing with the chosen remed1al
alternative.
5.
Concern: Several commun1ty members have asked lf they wlll be
compensated for the stress they have exper~enced because of .thelr
potential relocation and loss of a sense of community, the potential
for health problems, community disruption from EPA and ARCO
activities. the constant presence of "outsiders" such as securlty
guards, and the long perlod of waitlng for a decision.
Response: There are no provisions in the Superfund lay or regulat10ns
for compensatlon for stress. EPA lS concerned about these issues and
will provide the necessary assistance to help residents plan for any
changes that may occur with selectlon of a remedial alternative.
6.
Concern: Community members have expressed frustration with the EPA
process, which they believe has not provided decisions, concr~te
information, or even reliable general information about the federal
government's plans ln the area. They said that the lnformat1on they
get is often vague and open to 1nterpretation.
Response: The study process at the Mill Creek slte has reqttIre~
con~lderatlon of a broad range of 1ssues before a remedIal alternat1'le
could be selected. Hoyever, EPA has attempted to provIde adequate
3-73
-------
infGrmation to the communIty in formal and informal presentatIons and
make it avaIlable to the publIc for study.
Health and Safety
7.
Concern: The resIdents vho vish to stay in the community have
expressed concerns about vhether it is financially feasible to clean
up the area so that it is safe. They also asked hov they can ensure
that the area viII remain uncontaminated once it is cleaned up.
Simllarly. they are concerned about vhether their residences can be
.effectively cleaned to provide a healthy indoor environment.
Response: The selected alternat1ve vas chosen to protect the health
and safety of res1dents 1n the most cost-effective and environmentally
preferred manner. The potent1al for recontam1nation ~as considered in'
this f1nal select1on. It vas determ1ned that the area and residents'
homes could not be cleaned suff1ciently to ensure their health and
safety. The selection of permanent relocation of all residents as the
remedlal alternat1ve el1m1nates the concerns about the future safety
and cleanl1ness of the H1ll Creek area.
8.
Concern: Some residents expressed strong concern about the near- and
long-term health problems they may experlence because of exposure to
contaminants in the area. They have asked EPA to mon1tor the1r health
over time.
Response: EPA has concluded that a health study in Mill Creek could
not be supported under Superfund. Studies conducted to date are
adequate to assess the nature and extent of the contaminat1on and the
potential health effects. EPA has conveyed to area residents 1n a
letter to Mrs. Peg Patterson, the op1nion of Dr. Sue Binder of the
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) regaLdLng
add1t1onal health studIes. VhlCh stated:
3-74
-------
"I do not thlnk ve should conduct a health study in the
Anaconda area for tvo major reasons. First, the exposures
WhlCh are currently ongolng are substantially less than
those of the past. Data collected at this tlme vould
largely reflect the effects of past exposures and would not
be useful in evaluatlng the effects of current exposures.
Secondly, the population of the Anaconda area is small in
epidemiologic terms. The population having the highest
exposures, for example, children living in Hill Creek, is
extremely small. It is very rare to have interpretable
results from study of such a small population.
If the citlzens of the area are concerned about speclflc
health effects In residents of the area, they may be
interested ln developing their own survey. They can
document factual aspects of problems they think exist in the
area. The "Citlzen's GUlde for Community Health Studies,"
prepared by the State of Hlchlgan, offers guidelines for
developlng such a survey. I would be willing to offer
technlcal asslstance to a group wlshing to proceed with a
survey."
Such a study would make lt posslble for resldents to keep track of
health issues over time. The Communlty Relations Specialist could
assist in setting up a workshop with the DRRS representative and In
making the appropriate materials avallable.
9.
Concern: A commentor who Ilves outslde of Hill Creek but wlthin the
relion that could be affected by EPA activities at Mlll Creek
expressed concern that moving 5011 for a cleanup would cause negatl"e
effects on local alr quallty, and consequently for hlS beehi"e~
3-75
-------
Response: EPA vas avare of the concerns about dust during sOll
re~val for cleanup. Th1S vas gIven consIderation in the decls10n
makIng process. Hovever, there should be no negat1ve effects on local
air quality durIng the implementation of the selective alternat1ve,
the relocation of HIll Creek residents.
10.
Concern: One resldent said that urinary arsenic levels are similar
for his ChIld. vho remalned In his Hill Creek residence. and for
children vho vere temporarily relocated. Given this. he asks if the
temporary relocation effort vas really necessary.
Response: The temporary relocation vas conSIdered necessary to
protect chIldren from potential dangers associated vith contaminants
in the Hill Creek area. Because arsenic is rapidly excreted from the
body, ur1nary arsen1C levels reflect recent exposure. Hovever, a
single measure of the arsen1C level In anyone ind1vidual may not be
indicative of long-term exposure to arsen1C. A serIes of measurements
is needed to make a meaningful judgment of an individual's exposure.
11.
Concern: ResIdents are concerned that they may have to move in order
for EPA to carry out more studIes. SimIlarly, vith a cleanup effort.
some residents ask vhy temporary relocatIon is necessary and vhether
EPA could sImply "clean around them" if sOlI removal is the chosen
remedial alternat1ve.
Response: Temporary relocat1on ot residents vas considered as a
remedial alternative in an RI/FS Report Addendum. Hovever, this
alternative is no longer under considerat1on, thus the public concerns
in .11 are elim1nated. The selected alternative, permanent relocat1on
of all residents of Hlll Creek, is the most cost-effective and
environmentally preferred remedy.
3-76
-------
Property Values and Costs
12.
Concern: Residents expressed strong concerns about ho~ they ~ould be
compensated if they were relocated from Hill Creek. They asked
whether compensation for their properties will be based on market
value or on true replacement value, which provides a similar house and
property. Others have asked lf some people, such as elderly and
retired people, can choose a cash settlement rather than another
house.
Response: The optlons for reloeatlon of residents from Mill Creek
include (1) reloeatlon under the dlreetion of FEMA and (2) voluntary
relocatlon by ARCO. If FEHA manages the relocation process, it would
follov the Unlform Reloeatlon Asslstanee and Real Property Acquisltlon
Pollcles Act of 1970 and related regulations (~~ CFR Part 25). Under
these regulatIons, the FS Report lndicates that property ovners can be
offered falr market value or a higher amount depending on the
relocation offlcials' Judgment of Just compensation. The falr market
value would be based on an appraisal of the property's value prlor to
discovery of contaminatlon in Hlll Creek. Owners can appeal an offer
to the government and can pursue Judiclal reviev. If FEHA does not
manage the relocatlon process, the compensation process can be more
flexible but vill follov the same gUldellnes.
13.
Concern: Several Hlll Creek community members believe the EPA
remedial program has lowered thelr property values. They stated medla
exposure has made the properties unsellable and possibly not
mortgageable. Residents also are uncertain about whether to improve
their homes if they are gOlng to be relocated; as a consequence, many
said that thelr homes are depreciating. They asked ~hen a deC1Slon
will be made about the remedlal alternative and possIble compensatIon
so they can make plans to address any changes that vill result fLom
the deciSIons.
3-77
-------
Response: It is poss1ble that negat1ve publlC1ty about Hill Creek hasi
affected att1tudes tovard property values 1n M1ll Creek. Ho~ever,
under the Superfund guidel1nes relocation compensation is dec1ded on
1ndiv1dual case-by-case bas1s and could be based on property values
before contaminatl0n vas discovered in Hill Creek. In carrying out
the selected alternative conslderation vill be given to res1dents'
concerns.
14.
Concern: Some people in the commun1ty expressed concern that EPA or
ARCa vill relocate current residents, cleanup the property, and then
sell it to others at a profit.
Response: Under the selected alternative of relocat1on of all
res1dents, it is likely that title to the land vould be held by ARCO.
As presented 1n the RIfFS cleanup costs for Ml1l Creek are potent1ally
very h1gh. The potent1al for prof1t 1S considered to be m1nimal.
Permanent cleanup v11l be evaluated 1n the RIfFS conducted for a later
operable un1t.
15.
Concern: Residents stated that there are many other direct costs 1n
add1t10n to the value of the property that may be associated vith
relocation. They asked vhether they vill be compensated for these
other costs, such as higher mortgage payments, moving costs, commut1ng
costs, and 1ncreased utility cost, if they must move.
Response: Under a FEHA relocat10n program, the regulations at 44 CFR
Part 25 noted above also vould provide for compensation of the
increased cost of a comparable residence, and the increased cost of
nev financing under certain circumstances, t1tle transfer expenses (to
the proper governmental body), and mov1ng expenses. Hovever. all
settlements are determ1ned on a case-by-case bas1s.
3-78
-------
Land Use and Env1ron~ental Concerns
16.
Concern: Some res1dents have asked, 1n the event they must relocate,
what would prevent EPA from finding contaminants in their new
neighborhoods and starting the process allover?
Response: If FEHA is the respons1ble agency, the regulations 1t must
follow in relocating residents, include assistance in finding a
comparable replacement dwelling for the people to be relocated. The
FS Report (pg. 5-53) describes the process in the following way: "One
'comparable replacement dwelling' must be made available to the
displaced person and if poss1ble three or more comparable replacement
dwell1ngs. A comparable replacement dwelling is defined as decent,
safe, and san1tary (meets applicable housing and occupational codes),
functionally Slm1lar to the person's dlsplaced house, in an area that
is not subJect to adverse env1ronmental cond1tions and is accesslble
to the person's place of employment, on a site that is typical 1n size
for residentlal development w1th normal site improvement, currentlj
available to the dlsplaced person, and within the financial means of
the displaced person", (44 CFR Part 25, (emphasis added)].
17.
Concern: Local off1c1als expressed concern that the land use
classlflcations given ln the FS Report are inconsistent both with
remed1al response objectlves and local land use plann1ng
respons1b1l1tles. They asked how EPA and ARCO 1ntend to coordlnate
with them regard1ng local land use regulations and guidelines. Local
land use regulat10ns would require that land in Hill Creek, at a
minimum, be returned safely to its intended use, agricultural, or that
an alternative class1flcation be requested. Officials further noted
that the limits to be put on land through EPA's or the State's
authority may confllct wlth the county's tradltlonal prerogatlve to
regulate land use.
3-79
-------
Response: The land use areas in the FS Report ct~ated by ARca to
focus the lnvestlgatlon on the areas of Hlll Creek that ARCa bel1e~ed
were used by people most frequently (high use areas), less frequently
(outlYlng areas) and very infrequently. if at all (ARca-owned areas),
were used to evaluate different degrees of cleanup programs. EPA
indicated re1iabi1lty problems with remed1a1 alternatives based on
these land use categories 1n the FS report and identifled reasons why
this class1fication was not consistent with the remedial response
objectives (Final RIfFS, p. 3.3). EPA qualified this land use
classification scheme throughout the RIfFS by identifying long-term
reliability problems vlth partial cleanup remedial action alternatives
relying upon the ARca land use c1asslfication scheme.
EPA does not intend to supplant traditional land use planning by local
authorit1es. If a need for instltutional controls to supplement
remedlal actlon 1S ldent1fled by EPA in future operable units at the
Anaconda Smelter NPL. EPA v1ll contact the responslble land use
planning author1ties to dlSCUSS alternative approaches. See response
to Comment #7 in Seetlon 3.4 Policy Issues for det.i1ed discussion of
EPA's position.
18.
Concern: Deer Lodge - Anaconda City and County officials have
requested a technical assistance grant to help them understand the
technlcal lssues related to land use ln the county.
Response: A formal application must be filed with EPA before a
technical assistance grant request can be considered. The local
community relations specla1ist, vho vorks under contract to EPA vith
residents living in the vicinity of the Anaconda site can assist
community members with this effort. Grant funds vil1 be ava1lable as
500n as EPA develops and publishes rules for this nev progra~. ThlS
is anticlpated for December 1987.
3-80
-------
19.
Concern:
The director of the Bureau of Solid and Hazardous Yaste of
the Montana Department of Health and Environmental SClences has
indicated his concern that the EPA process has been too narrovly
focused on public health issues and not adequately considered
environmental and welfare issues as required by Superfund.
Response: EPA has followed all of the requirements of Superfund in
revieving and guiding ARCO's work. Public health has been the primary
focus of these efforts, as intended by Superfund. Additional
environmental and welfare is~ues will be furtHer addressed in RIfFS
activities associated with subsequent operable units at the Anaconda
Smelter NPL site.
3-81
-------
3.4
POLICY ISSUES
1.
Comment 2D(1): ARCO expressed concerns that EPA substantlally altered
the public health and environmental screenine summary table (Table
4.4-1) resultine in an analysis which misrepresents the prellminary
screenine of remedial action alternatives. (ARCO)
Response: EPA directed ARCO to make the revisions to Table 4.4-1 in
order that the analysis represented by this table be consistent with
the analyses presented in section 5 of the FS. As EPA ~ecame more
aware of the faulty assumptions supportine alternatives which were
evaluated in the initlal alternatives screenine document, EPA directed
ARCO to make the necessary chanees in the screenine summary which
would make the FS internally consistent.
2.
Comment 2.6:
position that
RIfFS intended
ARCO provided a comment expresslne concern
ARCO remove experimental results presented
to represent partial release of metals in
over EPA's
in the Dra t
the human
eut.
(ARCO)
Response: The extraction procedures used in the "human eut"
experiments had little to do with the conditions of phYS10loeic
effects in the stomach or cut. Absorption of metal throueh the small
and laree intestine results from multi-faceted mechanisms. Host of
the absorption is by facilltated transport plnocytosis. EPA therefore
did not feel that the experimental results should be presented in the
RIIFS.
Failure Criteria of Potential Failure Ranking Hatrix in FS
3.
Comment 5.1: ARCO contends that land uses have a rouehly equal
potential to chanee reeardless of the alternative considered. (ARCO)
3-82
-------
Response: As explained by footnote 17 to Figure 5.~-1, fa1lure of the
remedy resulting from changes 1n land use vould vary depend1ng on the
amount of s01l removed from the site. Clearly if all contam1nants
were removed (42 inch soil removal) there would be a very lov
potential for failure of the remedy even if land use changed.
Conversely, if only 6 inches of soil were removed, leaving a
contaminated substrate, the potential for exposure to contam1nants
(failure of the remedy) would be higher if land use changed to a
higher land use where contaminants could be reexposed through any of
several human activities such as gardening or constructing
foundations.
4.
Comment 5.2: ARca contends the ranking of potential failure for
Alternative 112 is inconsistent with the definition of Alternative
112, which assumes inst1tutiona1 controls v1ll not be affect1ve.
(ARCC)
Response:
EPA disagrees
vith ARca's pos1tion. Clearly if all
(i.e., 42 lnch 5011 removal) there is llttle
to fail regardless of the failure of
This point is presented in footnote 17 to
contamlnants are removed
potential for the remedy
institutional controls.
Figure 5.6-1.
5.
Comment 5.3: ARCO contends the ranklngs in the matrix concerning
potential fallure of vegetation are incorrect because they are based
on an incorrect assumption that 18 inches of suitable root1ng materlal
would be necessary in order for vegetation to survive over the long
term.
(ARCC)
Response: EPA contlnues to disagree with ARCO's position. EPA's
position has been conveyed several times to ARCO. Most recently EPA s
RIfFS addendum and letter of August 27, 1987 respond to th1S concern.
3-83
-------
6.
Comment 5.4: ARCO disagrees that 0.05
deposition in the upper 1 lnch of soil
for recontamination. (ARCO)
to 1.5 mg/kg annual arsenlC
represents a moderate potentla:
Response: EPA's statement that a moderate potential for
recontamination exists (see footnote 22, page 5-14) is based on a long
term perspective. EPA has no assurance that remedial actlon viII
adequately address the expanSlve source areas of contamlnated
soils/vastes upvind from Mill Creek. EPA's recent air monltoring in
Hill Creek indicates that contaminated materials continue to be
imposed on Mill Creek in spite of efforts to cover flue dust plIes and
to cover Smelter Hill vlth clean fill materials. EPA therefore
maintains that a moderate potential exists for recontamination from
annual arsenic deposltlon of contaminated upvlnd areas.
7.
Comment: ARCO has provlded numerous comments regardlng thelr
disagreement vith EPA's decislon to disallov subdividing land use
betveen high, medlum, and lov vith respect to the development of
remedial alternatlves. (ARCO)
Response: It has been and continues to be EPA's pOSltlon that the
basic assumptlon underlYlng the land use division -- that ARCO ~lll
hold title to the land in Mill Creek in perpetulty -- is specious.
EPA fully understands ARCO's rationale for developing the range of
alternatives that it dld. EPA's position is that current land use
does not reflect realistic land use at the conclusion of the remedlal
action let alone one or tvo years after that. It 1s reasonable to
assume that after remediation 1s completed the lands vould be sold by
ARCO. This is consistent vith ARCO's current practice. EPA's mandate
from Congress for permanence (CERCLA 121(d» requires EPA to conslder
the likelihood of different land ovners for the slte. To that
objective, EPA feels that vithout any effective institutional controls
available, ARCO cannot assume llmited future use of the area. The use
of fencing is not ln and of itself a permanent remedy.
Fenclng 15
3-84
-------
used merely to limit access during the establishment of a vegetat1~e
cover.
8.
Comment: ARCO states that changes requested by EPA regarding the
qualification of a stratified land use result in biased analyses
slanting the preferred alternatives to elther permanent relocation or
complete excavation. (ARCO)
Response: EPA disagrees vith ARCO's contention that the results are
biased. The addition of qualifying language clarifies to the public
that EPA does not accept ARCO's posltion that remediation should be
conducted on an ovnership basis rather than a contamination level
basis. EPA's request vas to develop a range of excavation
alternatives based upon concentration of contaminant and depth due to
the extremely tenuous nature of their future land ovnershlp.
9.
Comment: ARCO is unaware of a requlrement for a State-FEHA
cooperative agreement, and the state requirement to assur~ provislon
of adequate off-site disposal facility.
(ARCO)
Response: A Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between EPA and FEMA
dated April 8, 1985 outlines procedures for establishment of
cooperative agreements between States and FEMA concerning State
assurances, roles and responsibillties in permanent relocatlon
actions.
In a fund-financed state-lead remedy, EPA vould also enter into a
cooperative alreement or contract vlth Montana in which CERCLA
l04(c)(3) assurances vould have to be agreed to. ThlS includes
l04(c)(3)(B) vhich vould require Montana to provide off-site disposal
facilities if they are necessary. This provision becomes effective 1n
December 1989. Based upon current schedules this assurance may not be
relevant. The selected remedy includes not only acquis1tlon of
property but the demollt10n of structures as vell VhlCh impl1es
3-85
-------
on-site temporary disposal facilities. If, however, appropr1ate
on-site temporary disposal facilities are not available, the off-Slte
location may be necessary although not expected at th1S tlme.
10.
Comment: A commentor expressed concerns that as part of the remedlal
action at Hill Creek, no contaminated soils should be moved in order
to prevent any airborne contamination. (Public)
Response: EPA acknowledges that there is the potential for
contaminated dust to be released during house demolition or site
stabilization procedures. Best management practices will be
implemented to minimize releases of dust. This short term effect 1S
considered acceptable given the benefit of the risk reduction which
would result from the remedlal action.
11.
Comment: The risk numbers presented 1n the Hill Creek Feas1b1lity
Study are inconsistent wlth the early December, 1986 CAG meetings.
(Public)
Response: Hill Creek Endangerment Assessment and the Feasibllity
~tudy have been revised to be consistent with the October 1986 Draft
Arsenic Risk Assessment Forum Report.
3-86
-------
3.5
TECHNICAL ISSUES
1.
Comment: Activity patterns of people living vithin the site
boundaries should be evaluated to determine a time-veighted average
exposure.
(ARCO)
Response: EPA does not accept ARCO's recommendation to use a
time-weighted exposure assessment. This approach does not support the
objective of the RIfFS for cleanup alternatives to permanently protect
human health vithin the boundaries of Hill Creek. The potential
exists for homes to be constructed throughout the confines of the
community and children may roam videly during play actlvlties. A
clearly delineated boundary bet~een hlgh use and outlying areas vould
be arbitrary and of doubtful validity. This positlon vas previously
stated in Robert L. Duprey's letter to Dr. Richard Krablin dated
October 31. 1987.
2.
Commen t :
It is unrealistic to use the maXlmum values for each medlu~
in calculating the vorst case risk estimate.
(ARCO)
Response: EPA has revised the Endangerment Assessment to include all
applicable environmental data collected in the Hill Creek area. The
vorst case risk estimate is based on the highest concentrations of
contaminants in each medium to vhich residents could potentially be
exposed.
3.
Comment: One of the sources of uncertainty in the risk assessment
model is due to the accuracy and precision of analytical data for the
various environmental medla. (ARCO)
Response: Analytlcal data collected as part of the Mlll Creek RI/FS
vas subJected to strict quallty control and quallty assurance (QA/QC)
3-87
-------
procedures. Only those data that met or exceeded all of the QA/QC
criJeria vere used in the risk assessment model. Although some error
may occur due to variation in analytical results, the error in the
data base upon vhich the risk assessment vas based vas sufficiently
lov to minimize the uncertainty due to analytical var1ability. Refer
to EPA's detailed comments concerning data utilization, transmitted to
ARCO in an August 27, 1987 letter to Jack Davis.
4.
Comment: Another source of uncertainty in the model is the human
activity patterns in lov use non-residential areas. (ARCO)
Response: EPA's goal 1S long term protection of publlC health in Hlll
Creek. Because of the potent1al for futur~ changes in land use and
the videspread nature of the contamination, EPA felt that it vas
appropriate to include data on contamination levels in adjacent
non-residential areas in the risk assessment model.
5.
Comment: The Hontana Yater Quality Act ant1-degradation policy is not
applicable because non-point sources are not considered to be
degradation if reasonable land, soil, and vater management practices
are applled. (ARCO)
Response: Although the State's nondegradation policy for surface
vater vas identified as a State AlAR by Hontana and is set forth at
HCA Sectlon 75-5-303 and ARH Section 16.2.701(1) the nondegradatlon
policy vill not apply. The only potential sources of discharge into
the stream of Hill Creek are non-point sources and these vill be
adequately addressed by best management practices. See EPA's ARARs
analysis.
6.
Comment: If the vater quality anti-degradation policy vere considered
relevant and approprlate, land in Hlll Creek vould have to be manage~
such that no exceedances of vater quality standards occurred.
(ARGO)
3-88
-------
Response: ARCO's comment does not accurately reflect the State
requirements. The State's nondegradation policy is set forth at ~c;
section 75-5-303 and ARM section 16.20.701(1). Subparagraph
16.20.701(1)(b)(1) states that, "Changes in surface vater qual1ty, or
ground vater quality vhether or not applicable ground vater standards
for dissolved substances are violated, resulting from nonpoint source
pollutants from lands vhere all reasonable land, soil, and vater
management or conservation practices have been applied are not
considered degradation." See EPA's ARARs analysis.
7.
Comment: The state's ground vater standard is not more str1ngent than
the applicable Federal standard, and, therefore, need not be
considered. (ARCO)
Response: It is EPA's oplnion that the state's nondegradation policy
is not applicable. See EPA's ARARs analysls.
8.
Comment: The State's 24-hour standard for total suspended
partlculates is not applicable because actions in Mill Creek would not
be considered "stationary sources" or major stationary sources.
(ARCO)
Response: The State's total suspended particulate standard 1S
applicable to any ambient air accessible to the public. For
applicability of the State's TSP standard as an ARAR see EPA's ARARs
analysis and response to Comment 114 in Section 3.2.2.
9.
Comment: Air quality permlts are not required for remedlal actions
under Superfund. (ARCO)
Response: Permits are not required for on-site act10ns taken under
CERCLA. Hovever, these actions must comply vith applicable, relevant
and appropriate standards, guidellnes, and criteria of State and
Federal environmental lavs.
3-89
-------
10.
Comment: The costs for temporary relocation presented in the RIfFS
report supplement lack sufficient detail to allov accurate comparison
of the cost of temporary relocation vith the cost of permanent.
relocation and buyout (Alternative 1A). (ARCO)
Response: Additional detail on the costs for temporary relocatlon
have been incorporated into the Final RIfFS for the H111 Creek.
11.
Comment:
Vhen costs such as for relocation of residents back to Mlll
Creek and common response actions such as house cleaning, vater supply
replacement, and road paving are included with the temporary
relocation option, the cost for temporary relocation for only one year
is roughly equivalent to that for permanent relocation vith buyout.
(ARCO)
Response: A detailed comparison of cost for temporary and permanent
relocatlon is included in the Flnal RIfFS.
12.
Comment: The cost of complete buyout may eventually be included under
the temporary relocation option if permanent re!ocation of Mill Creek
residents were determined to be an appropriate action following
completion of the Smelter RIfFS.
(ARCO)
Response:
EPA agrees.
13.
Comment: The Potential Failure Ranking Matrix
of the FS report fai!s to present an objective
remedia! action alternatlves. (ARCO)
presented on page 5-140
evaluation of the
Response: EPA feels that the Potential Failure Ranking Matrix does
present an objective evaluatlon of the long term effectiveness of
remedlal actlon alternatives. Comments #14 and #15 address specific
concerns regardlng thlS matrlX.
3-90
-------
14.
Comment: Changes made by EPA in the public health screenlng summar}
table (Table 4.4-1) in the FS report misrepresent the prellmlnary
screening of remedial action alternatives. (ARCO)
Response: EPA feels the original analysis vas satisfactory.
the RI/FS health screenlng table vas changed due to additional
analysis/data.
Hovever,
15.
Comment: The matrlx indicates that the potential for change in land
use vould be greater for Alternative 112. Land uses have a roughly
equal potential to change regardless of the alternative considered.
(ARCO)
Response: Alternative 112 vas added to evaluate conditions that vould
result if instltutlonal controls vere ineffectlve. It vas not EPA's
intent to indicate that the potential for land use changes vould be
greater or less for Alternative 112 than for other alternatives. The
Potential Failure Ranklng Matrix in the Final FS, reflects thlS intent
and indicates that Alternative 112 has potential for changes in land
use in accord vith the other alternatives.
16.
Comment: The potential for failure of institutional control for
Alternative #12 is inconsistent vlth the definition of Alternatlve
#12, vhich assumes institutional controls vlll not be effectlve.
(ARCO)
Response: EPA agrees. The potential failur~ of
controls for Alternative #12 is llsted as "High"
Failure Ranking Matrlx in the Final FS.
institutional
in the Potentlal
17.
Comment: It is incorrect to assume a high potential for fallure of
vegetation simply because 18 inches of clean fill materlal would not
be provided under some alternatives. (ARCO)
3-91
-------
Response: Available in~ormation on the soils of the H1ll Creek Slte
provides substantial evidence that arsenic and trace metals are
present at concentrations greatly exceeding background levels and tha:
arsenic and metals in these soils may limit the suitab1lity of these
materials as a plant growth medium. It is therefore correct to
assume, at the FS stage, a high potential for failure for alternatives
which would not provide a suitable plant growth medium withln an
adequate root zone. During the remedial design phase, it will be
appropriate to evaluate available materials for thelr suitability as a
plant growth medium at this site.
Existing field data and evidence available in the literature suggests
that plant productivity and cover may be affected by arsenic, metals,
and other soil sUltab1llty factors. The erosion protectlon afforded
by vegetation may be affected by sOlI factors since these factors have
been shown to influence the establishment and maintenance of an
effective vegetation cover. To be effective, a soil and vegetation
cover must prevent re-exposure of the contaminated soils Wh1Ch would
result from wind and water erOS1on in the absence of such a cover.
EPA recognizes that 5011 or plant growth med1um suitab1lity
evaluations should inclu~e laboratory soil analysis of plant ava1lable
arsenic and metals and should also encompass additional variables. As
an example of applicable suitability criteria, Shafer (1979) prov1des
suitability criteria for land capability classes which include, for a
Capability Class IV soil, root zone depth greater than 50 em, vfsl to
sicl texture, less than 35 percent lithic rock fragment~, greater than
3.5 in. available water holding capacity, a range of drainage classes,
slope less than 15 percent, no erosion hazard to moderate erosion
hazard, electr1cal conductivity less than 4 mlllimhos/cm, sod1um
adsorption ratio less than 20, pH 4.5 to 9.0, and climat1c
3-92
-------
considerations. The draft Montana Department of State Lands topsoll
and subsoil suitability criteria also provide useful guidance in thlS
area.
18.
Comment: An annual arsenic deposition rate estimate of 0.05 to'1.5
mg/kg in the upper 1 inch of soil represents a lov or lov to moderate
potential for recontamination, not a moderate potential for
recontamination as indicated in footnote 22 (page 5-14). (ARCO)
Response: EPA agrees that the modeling results indicate that the
short-term potential for recontamination is lov. Hovever, EPA's goal
is long term protection of public health. If deposition continued
over several decades, as has occurred previously, signif1cant
recontamination of H111 Creek soils could result. Also, it 1S EPA's
understanding that modeling vas based on average wind speeds and
average wind direct10n for the area. There is a potential for
significant recontaminat1on to occur during periods of high winds,
especially if highly contaminated materials such as flue dust were
transported under these conditions. For these reasons, EPA feels that
a moderate potential for recontamination exists.
19.
Comment: Compar1son of vegetation cover class and surfic1al soil
arsenic concentrat10ns indicates that arsenic concentrations vary
greatly for all vegetation classifications.
(ARCO)
Response: EPA agrees. Hovever, no conclusion regarding vegetat10n
responsive to soil contamination can be substantiated by this
observation. The comment references mapping of vegetation Wh1Ch is
comprised of broadly defined mapping units (cover classes) delineated
on the basis of species composition and structure of the vegetat1on.
Each unit includes variat10n 1n species composition, structure,
product1vity. vegetat10n cover, associated soils, land use hlstory.
and other variables. Because of th1S lnherent variat10n 1t 1S
inappropriate to suggest that vegetation 1S indifferent to arsenic or
3-93
-------
other metal concentrations based on the occurrence of wlde varlation
in surface arsenic concentrations within each cover class.
20.
Comment: The EPA conclusions regarding cause-and-effect relationships
between soil concentrations of arsenic, copper, lead, and zinc, and
the lack of vegetation in Hill Creek were obtained using erroneous
reasoning and the inappropriate use of data. (ARCO)
Response: The EPA Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study Report
Supplement appropriately identifies arsenic and metal contamination as
a factor limiting the suitabllity of Hlll Creek soils as a plant
growth medium. Vhile not definitlve on this question, the Hlll Creek
Remedial Investlgatlon Report (ARCO, 1986) also concludes that arsenlC
and metals contamination may have caused barren areas at the slte:
"In addition to the above-mentloned reasons for poor vegetatlon cover.
phytOtOX1City resultlng from elevated salls metals concentratlons may
playa role." The EPA and ARCO appear to be in concurrence that the
Hill Creek soils have elevated concentratlons of arsenlC and metals
and that elevated concentratlons of arsenic and certaln metals may
cause phytotoxic effects.
21.
Comment: Because phytotoxic sOll concentrations cannot be inferred
from literature, and are not known from field sampling, no conclusions
should be made regarding the cause of sparse vegetation in the Hill
Creek area.
(ARCO)
Response: The field observations reported in the Hill Creek Remedial
Investigation Report (ARCO, 1986) include sparse vegetation (Dry
meadov/Bare Areas) in areas east and south of contamlnant source
areas.
Arsenic and certain metals have been shown in the scient1f1c
literature to inhibit plant growth or to be phytOtOX1C. Therefore.
EPA's conclusion that arsenic and metals may occur at Hill Creek at
concentratlons unsuitable for a plant growth medlum 1S ent1rely
justified.
3-94
-------
22.
Comment: A more thorough evaluation of the existlng soil should be
conducted before complete topsoil replacement is prescrlbed.
Furthermore, an analysis of methods to reduce plant-available heavy
metal and arsenic concentrations in existing soil should be conducted.
(ARCO)
Response: If the remedial alternative selected includes topsoil
replacement, additional soil sampling vill be conducted to further
define the nature and extent of contamination. Although the toxicity
of metals to plants is of concern to EPA, the primary focus of the
Hill Creek RIfFS is protectlon of publlC health. Hltigatlon of
environmental impacts in the Hill Creek area vill be addressed as part
of the Anaconda Smelter R1/FS.
23.
Comment: If rooting depth is the crltical variable, revegetatlon
species could be restricted to sod-forming grasses vhich require a
rooting depth shallover than 18 inches. (ARCO)
Response: Use of sod-forming (rhizomatous) grasses vill not reduce
the depth of suitable material needed for an adequate rocting zone
Roots vhich develop from the grass rhizomes of a sod may occupy as
much soil volume as the roots of caespitose (non-rhlzomatous or short
rhizomatous) grasses (Yeaver 1958). Characteristically shallov-rooted
plant species include both rhizomatous and non-rhlzomatous grasses.
Shallov rooted plant species should not be selected for reclamation
because they are inferior for soil stabilization purposes; they yield
greater run-off, as a result of reduced absorption, and produce a
higher erosion risk. Revegetation speCles should be selected to help
provide a permanent, diverse, and effective vegetatlon cover. Specles
selected should be perennial and should have a demonstrated abillty to
reproduce, by seed or other means, in a similar environment.
3-95
-------
24.
Comment: EPA's conclus10n that the current distribution of bare and
vetetated areas on the H1l1 Creek site is determined by concentratlons
of arsenic and heavy metals in soils is not justif1ed and should be
eliminated from the RIfFS. (ARCO)
Response:
See response to Comment .20 in Section 3.5.
25.
Comment: Without an analysis of other factors that may control plant
distribution (e.g., available soil vater, soil pH, available
nutrients, or soil structure), it cannot be concluded that high soil
concentrations of metals preclude the establishment of plant cover.
(ARCO)
Response: Soils which are barren of vegetation occur in the Hill
Creek area. Available information indicates that the suitabil1ty of
these soils as a plant growth medium may be limited by the
concentration of arsenic and heavy metals. It is not necessary to
demonstrate that the eX1sting soils are unsuitable for revegetation
purposes. Rather, it w111 be necessary to demonstrate in the remedlal
design that materials proposed for a plant growth medium at the slte
will meet accepted sU1tability criteria including depth, physical
characteristics, and chemical characteristics.
26.
Comment: The X-HET data are inappropriate for character1zation of
contaminant distr1butions and evaluat10n of potent1al public risks.
(ARCO)
Response: Analysis of variance calculations have demonstrated the
capability of X-HET analyses to distinguish between different
contaminant levels (As, Pb, Cu, and Zn) given the high sample Var1ance
present at the Hill Creek site. X-HET data were used for screen1ng
purposes and not for evaluation of public risk.
3-96
-------
27.
Comment: The X-MET data often lndlcated (especially for arsenic)
concentrations of several hundred ppm vhen concentrations vere
actually at or near background. (ARCO)
Response: Concentration ranges betveen background and 300 ppm are
very close to the analytical detection limit of the X-MET instrument
and subject to uncertainty. Because concentrations within this range
are much lower than anticipated action levels they are considered
insignificant from a screening standpoint.
28.
Comment: X-MET data for lead and copper often indicated undetected
concentrations when concentratlons were actually several hundred ppm.
(ARCQ)
Response:
See response for Comment .27 above.
29.
Comment: In the concentration range between about 1 to 10 times the
X-MET detection limits, the X-HET exhibited sporadically vide positl~e
and negative deviations from results obtained via approved U.S. EPA
methods. (ARCQ)
Response: In most cases. X-HET results within this range were vithln
~20 percent of the CLP results. The X-HET exhlbited optimum preC1Slon
within this range. which is likely to include the contamlnant actlon
levels. This is considered adequate for screening which was the goal
of the analysis.
In addition, the two methods
expected to agree perfectly.
whereas the CLP method is an
are different; the results are not
X-HET analysis is a "total" analysls,
HN03/H202 digestion.
30.
Comment: For concentratlons above about 10 times the X-HET detectlon
limits. the X-HET data tended to be substantially lower than results
obtained via approved EPA methods. (ARCD)
3-97
-------
Response: Concentrations above 10 times X-HET detectlon represent
substantially contaminated samples regardless of precise agreement
vith CLP values. The X-HET technique vas not designed to optimi%e the
precision at highly contaminated levels but, rather, it vas designed
to accurately indicate vhen a sample vas highly contaminated. In thlS
regard, the X-HET technique dld not fail to recognize contamlnation
above 10 times background.
31.
Comment: Columbia Scientific Instruments (CSI)
evaluation of EPA X-HET, quality assurance data
X-HET 840 had been improperly calibrated by EPA
investigation. (ARCD)
concluded based on an
and CSI data that the
during the Hill Creek
Response: The X-HET instrument vas calibrated according to standard
procedures outlined by CSI ln their operating manual and by personnel
trained by CSI. The callbration technique employed for thlS study has
since been verified by Stan Piorek (X~Ray Laboratory Manager at CS!).
The EPA X-HET data agrees very vell vith the data determined
independently by CSI, "thus confirming the correctness of the
approach" (Stan Piorak, personal communication).
32.
Comment: The EPA X-HET soils dzta lacks sufficient accuracy and
precision to be used for the elucidation of contamlnant dlstrlbutlon
for the evaluation of risk levels. (ARCD)
Response: Calculations of analytical precision indicate that the
X-HET technique is capable of distinguishing between contamlnant
levels for the range of As, Pb, Cu, and Zn concentrations present at
the site. The X-HET screening technlque vas meant to identify areas
for further study and not for health risk evaluation.
3-98
-------
33.
Comment: It is doubtful if the house cleaning
the Feasibility Study could adequately purge a
vashing and insulation replacement. (Public)
measures described 1n
home of tOX1C dusts by
Response: The results of professional house cleaning of selected
households as part of a Centers for Disease Control (CDC)
investigation in Hill Creek vere inconclusive. Heasures in addition
to house cleaning that may be necessary include, but are not limited
to the folloving: replacement of attic insulation; palnting of
interior valls; caulking of windovs; cleaning of heating ducts; and
replacement of carpeting.
34.
Comment: If an alternative is selected alloving Hill Creek residents
to remain in the1r present locations, a serious indoor sampllng effort
should be done to assess the risks. A full d~sclosure of the ECOLOGY
AND ENVIRONHENT, INC. indoor"studies should be made. (Public)
Response: A description of the indoor studies conducted for EPA by
Ecology and Environment, Inc. (E&E) is included in a memorandum from
David Franzen (E&E) to Hlke Bishop (EPA), titled "Prelimlnary Results
of the Resident1al Dust and Soil Sampling in Anaconda, Hontana and
Surrounding Communities" (12/2/85). A copy of thlS memorandum is
included in the Administrative Record for the Hill Creek RIfFS and 15
available for inspection by the public. If residents were to remaln
in Hill Creek, additional indoor sampling would be conducted to ensure
that public health goals were met. Consideration of the selected
alternative, relocation of all residents, removes the necessity for
indoor sampling.
35.
Comment: Run-off vaters are known to be important causes of on-goIng
land contamination and livestock loss at the East Helena Superfund
site and should be investigated further in Hill Creek. (Publ1c)
3-99
-------
Response: Unconfirmed reports of livestock and house pet loss due to
dri~king of contaminated vaters have been reported in the area.
Hovever, analyses of surface vaters conducted as part of the Hill
Creek RIfFS do not indicate significant potential for recontamination
of land or potential for livestock loss from runoff vater. Additional
measures to protect livestock and vildlife vill be evaluated as part
of the Anaconda Smelter RIfFS. Run-off control measures vill also be
considered to prevent recontamination of the Hill Creek area.
36.
Comment: Considerable soil data have been collected but data are not
readily comparable due to differences in sample design. (Public)
Response: Several different studies have been conducted to
characterize the nature and extent of soil contamination in the Hill
creek area. Although sampling methods and analytical technlques have
differed somevhat from study to study, -the studies yield consistent
results and indicate videspread contamination of soils in the Hill
Creek community.
37.
Comment:
(Public)
Quality assurance information in the RIfFS is lacking.
Response: Extensive quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC)
procedures vere implemented for all steps in the collection,
transport, analysis, and data reduction of samples collected in
support of the Hill Creek RIfFS. The QAfQC data for the Hill Creek
RIfFS data base is included in the Administrative Record vhich is
available for inspection by the public. In addition, detailed
comments concerning data utilization vas transmitted to ARCO in an
August 27, 1987 letter to Jack Davis.
38.
Comment: Soils metal data appear to be inconsistent because data
described as total elemental analyses presented in Clement (1986) are
3-100
-------
generally less in concentration than corresponding extractable metal
data included in the RIfFS report. (Public)
Response: The digestion procedure used for soil samples collected for
the Hill Creek RIfFS vas a nitric acid/hydrogen peroxide extraction
solution. This method yields the total extractable metals
concentration. The analyses reported in Clement (1986) and the RIfFS
were performed using the same extraction procedure and should be
referred to as "total extractable metals". This discrepancy has been
corrected in the Final RIfFS.
39.
Comment: The gradient in arsenic levels in community soils suggest
that the flue dust storage area vas and is the main source of H111
Creek soil arsenic. (Publ1C)
Response: The elevated soil concentration near the flue dust storage
facility does suggest that this source contributed to the contaminant
levels in the Hill Creek area; hovever, much of the soil contamination
1n the Hill Creek community is the result of historic smelter
emissions.
40.
Comment: Other potentially toxic elements, in addit10n to arsen1C.
lead, and cadm1um, can be emitted from non-ferrous smelting
operations. Analyses for these elements should be performed.
(Public)
Response: Area soils, including samples from Hill Creek, have been
analyzed for the folloving parameters: antimony, arsenic, cadmium,
copper, chromium, iron, lead, manganese, mercury, and Zlnc. Of these
potential contaminants, only arsenic, lead, and cadmium are present at
levels sufficiently high to pose a threat to human health.
3-101
-------
41.
Comment: Future recontamination from surface vaters and fugitive dust
.
could jeopardize the safety of small children and pets and could
contaminate garden vegetables. (Public)
Response: Prevention of recontamination by surface vaters and
fugitive dust vill be included in the remedial action for Hill Creek
and in the Anaconda Smelter RIfFS. Consent agreements betveen ARCO
and EPA have been implemented to reduce fugitive emissions from
potential sources of recontamination such as the flue dust storage
facility and road dust.
42.
Comment: Air quality contamination in 1984 and 1985 are not as
elevated as those from hlstoric data (e.g., 1961). (Public)
Response: Recent air quality contamination (1984 and 1985) vas not as
elevated as historic contamlnation because the smelter has been
decommissioned.
The focus of the Hill Creek RIfFS is to evaluate
existing and future risk and to determine means of reducing that risk.
Historic data vas useful for assessing the source of contaminatlon but
is not a factor in estimating risk or evaluating potential remedles.
43.
Comment: The one-in-three day samples collected in 1984-85 collected
only one third of the avallable particulates, i.e., two-thirds of the
dust episodes associated vith flue dust handling, smelter demolltion,
etc. vere not measured.
(Public)
Response: It is standard, procedUfe to operate a hlgh-volume air
sampler for a 24 hour period every 3 or 4 days. Some dust episodes
would be missed during this period; hovever, continued monitoring over
a period of years vill provide data that are representative of
existing condltlons.
3-102
-------
44.
Comment: Observations at the Kellogg, IC Superfund
cadmium migrates upvard rather than downward within
(Public)
site indlcate that
the sOll proflle.
Response: Numerous factors affect the rate and direction of metal
migration in a soil profile. Normally, the net movement of metals 1n
a soil profile is in a dovnvard direct1on. It is possible that
evapotranspiration at the soil surface could create a "w1cking" effect
causing the net movement of metals to be in an upvard direction. No
evidence of net upvard movement of metals has been demonstrated in the
Hill Creek area.
45.
Comment: The Hill Creek residents, biota and soil were negatively
impacted by airborne contaminants emitted from Smelter operations
during the operation of the Anaconda Smelter (1902-1980). (Public)
Response:
EPA agrees.
46.
Comment: The location of meteorological stations are not clearly
defined in Figure 3. (PubllC)
Response: A figure that clearly shows the locatlon of the
meteorological stations in the area has been included in the Final
RIfFS.
47.
Comment:
represent
have been
The location of existing meteorological stations do not
Hill Creek air patterns. A meteorological station should
installed during the 1984-1986 time period. (Public)
Response: If residents remain 1n Hill Creek as part of the selected
remedy, a meteorological station will be installed to continuously
monitor vind speed and d1rection.
3-103
-------
48.
Comment: The 10 square miles of highest soil contamination should be
platted on a map. ThlS large area of contaminated 5011 could be a
potential source of future contaminatlon for the Hill Creek area.
(Public)
Response: Soil sampling collected during Stage I of the Anaconda
Smelter RIIFS and from previous sampling efforts indicate that the
soil contamination is extensive. Additional sampling is proposed to
further define the nature and extent of this contamination. The
selected remedies for the Anaconda Smelter RIIFS vill address this
potential source of recontamination.
49.
Comment: Any reduction in stack emissions due to installation of the
baghouse occurred after 1975. (Public)
Response:
EPA agrees.
50.
Comment: It vould be more meaningful to lay people if the content of
As, Cd, and Pb in the flue dust vas reported in percent. (Public)
Response: EPA agrees. Table 6 in the Final RIIFS has been revlsed to
express the flue dust concentrations of arsenic, cadmium, and lead in
percentages, rather than parts per million.
51.
Comment: The Federal Primary Drlnking Yater Standard for As is 0.050
mgll, not 0.050 ug/l. (Public)
Response:
RI/PS.
This typographical error has been corrected in the Final
52.
Comment:
report.
Yells listed in Table 12 should be located on a map 1n the
(Public)
3-104
-------
Response: VeIl locations are shovn on a map of approXlmate scale and
are referenced in the text and in Table 12 in the Flnal RI/FS.
53.
Comment: 50il sampling should focus on the fine soil fractlon (e.g.,
minus 325 mesh) vhich is more representative of potential exposure due
to airborne dust inhalation and soil ingestion than the total
fraction.. (Public)
Response: EPA agrees that the fine soil fraction vould be more
subject to airborne transport than larger fractions and therefore,
more likely to be inhaled. 50il sampling methods used by EPA
represent the standard procedure for chemical analysis of SOlld
materials such as soils. The analytical results obtained by using
fine soil fraction fell vithin the same range as EPA's data and
support EPA findings. For the soil ingestion route, hovever,
ingestion vould not be restricted to the flne soil fraction.
Therefore, the standard methods used by EPA are more inclusive and
appropriate.
54.
Commen t :
Contaminated soils in the area of Hill Creek viII act as
future sources of airborne and vaterborne contamination for the Hlll
Creek area~
( Public)
Response: EPA agrees. Hethods of reducing exposure to contaminated
soils in the area vlll be addressed in the Anaconda Smelter RI/FS.
55.
Comment: Even though EPA approved fiberglass filters vere
prior to Harch 1984, these air quality data are usable and
reported. (Public)
not used
should be
Response: One of the objectives of the RI for Hill Creek is to
evaluate the existing and future risk to public health. Alr quality
data collected since smelter shutdovn in 1981 are representatlve of
existing conditlons and have been incorporated into the Flnal RI/FS.
3-105
-------
56.
Comment:
cessation
81storic air quality sampling data collected prlor to
of smelting activities should have been reviewed and
(Public)
analyzed.
Response: The Hill Creek RIfFS focuses on existing and future risk to
public health. Because data collected prior to smelter shutdown are
not representative of eXlsting or future conditions, they are not used
to evaluate existing or future risk to public health.
57.
Comment: A veather station for gathering data on vind speed, vind
direction, and measurable precipitation should have been installed
along vith the Hill Creek Park air sampling station in April, 1984,
vhen a reviev of the Hill Creek area indicated a potential health
problem from arsenlC and heavy metals. (PubllC)
Response: Initlally, data collected at other veather stations in the
area vere thought to be representative of conditions in Hill Creek.
Further analysis of data suggested that-vind direction and possibly
vind speed may be somevhat different in Kill Creek than that at the
existing veather stations. Therefore, if residents vere to rema1n 1n
Kill Creek as part of the selected remedy, a meteorological stat10n
vould be installed to monitor vind speed and direction. It is EPA's
opinion that regional precipitation data are representative of
conditions in Hill Creek.
58-
Comment: The air quality data collected during the Hill Creek Park
construction period is a good indicator of air quality that vould
occur during soil removal and replacement and sodding. It should be
presented. (PubllC)
Response: EPA agrees. These data vere used to evaluate potentlal
risk to human health durlng soil cleanup activlties.
3-106
-------
59.
Comment: The predicted annual increase in soil arsen1C concentrat1on
appears to be very small compared to annual arsenic deposit1on that
occurred in the past. (Public)
Response: Annual arsenic deposition has decreased slgn1ficantly since
smelter shutdown. However, due to the risk associated with arsenic
exposure, one of EPA's goals is to reduce the potential for future
recontamination and exposure to the extent possible.
60.
Comment: The removal of soil (partial or
simultaneous protection of the residents'
difficult to accomplish.- (Public)
complete) and the
health will be extremelj
Response: It would have been necessary to temporarily relocate the
residents if soil cleanup activities were to be conducted in the M1ll
Creek community. EPA considered a plan to relocate resldents only
from the areas where actlve soil cleanup would be underway in order to
minimize the period of temporary relocation for the affected
residents. Public health concerns were the primary consideration 1n
choosing the selected alternatlve, permanent relocation of all
resldents.
61.
Comment: The endangerment assessment states that most of the arsenlC
is in the form of arsenic pentoxlde (not arsenlC trioxide). (Public)
Response:
difficult.
Determination of the oxidation state of arsenlC is
Data indicated that most of the arsenic in smelter
emissions and in flue dust is arsenic trioxide. Oxidation of trioX1de
to arsenic pentoxide may occur in the 5011. It appears that both
forms are present in the soils in Hill Creek. Both oxidat1on states
of arsenic pose a signIficant risk to human health.
3-107
-------
62.
Comment: A veather station should be installed in Hill Creek Park.
Am6ient air sampllng and analysis should be contlnued to deflne the
source and quantlty of contaminants entering the area. (PubllC)
Response:
See response to comment .47 in this section.
63.
Comment: Excavation of 42 inches of material should not be considered
if adequate clean borrov material to replace this excavated material
is not available. (Public)
Response: If the selected remedy lncluded excavation of 42 inches of
material, the Remedlal Deslgn vould have included an investlgatlon to
identify additional sources of clean borrov material.
64.
Comment: A diversion ditch vith sediment traps should be designed and
constructed to dlvert the 100-year preclpltation event around the Hlll
Creek site.
(PubllC)
Response: Considerlng that the selected alternative is the permanent
relocation of all residents of Hill Creek such issues as controlllng
the transport of contaminated sediments are not addressed in the
remedy for this operable unit. Environmental issues may be consldered
in remedies for other operable units at the Anaconda Smelter NPL.
65.
Comment: The proposed boundary of the area excavated is
An irregular boundary incorporating a buffer zone of 300
avay from any homesite should be incorporated. (Public)
unreallstlC.
to 500 fee~
Response: The prlmary objective of the Hill Creek RIfFS is to reduce
exposure and resulting risk to arsenic and other contaminants.
Effective means for controlling exposure and future recontaminatlon
from areas adjacent to homesites vas addressed by EPA in the Final
RIfFS.
3-108
-------
66.
Comment: If any Hill Creek homes are to continue as llvlng quarters
(on-site or off-site), the interlors of some may have to be gutted anc
completely refinished if they are to be sufficiently purged of tOX1C
contaminants. Ordinary cleaning of the homes vill not be effectlve.
(Public)
Response: Studies conducted by EPA indicated that conventional house
cleaning vas relatively ineffective in reducing the concentration of
contaminants in house dust in Hill Creek. Hare comprehensive measures
such as replacement of ceiling insulation, carpeting, painting of
valls, and others vere considered in the selection of the preferred
alternative.
67.
Comment: Vhy is there an optlon for soil removal, soil fill, and
revegetation on ARca property under Alternative 112 (page 5-24,
paragraph 1)1 ThlS doesn't agree vith Alternative 112, top of page
5-49. (Public)
Response: Alternative 112 assumes that instltutional controls vould
be ineffective in the future and residents vould have ready access to
adjacent properties currently ovned by ARCQ. Under this alternative,
soil removal, soil fill, and revegetatlon on adJacent ARCO property
vould be implemented to ensure adequate protection of publlC health.
68.
Comment: The cost of installing and/or operating a veather statlon
and air sampling station(s) in the Hill Creek. area should be included
in the appropriate alternatives. (Public)
Response: These costs viII be included for all remedial a1ternatlves
vhere residents vou1d remain in Hill Creek during and fo110ving
implementation of the selected alternative.
3-109
-------
GENERAL INFORHATION
69.
Comment: Additional sampling and evaluatlon of the brick piles
located about 1/4 mile SE of the Hill Creek study area and lmmediately
adjacent area should be conducted to determine the level of hazard
presented and protective action that should be taken. (Public)
Response: A screening study was conducted In August 1986 to sample
and evaluate potential "hot spots" such as the brick piles described
above. If these studies or other surveys indicate that these
potential "hot spots" pose a potential threat to human health,
activities will be undertaken to effectlvely reduce this potential
threat.
3-110
-------
4.0
HEALTH ASSESSMENT
Comments prov1ded 1n the Health Assessment (HA), February 5, 1987, by ATSDR
to EPA Region VIII on the evaluat10n of the April 1986 M1ll Creek EA and
the draft RI/FS are 1dent1fied and responded to in the discuss10n belovo
1.
Comment: The PHA 1n the RI does not expl1c1tly indicate vhether the
sites for soil sampl1ng vere selected in a random or strat1fied random
fashion. The risk assessment uses representative soil samples derived
from a summat10n of ve1ghted concentrat1ons. A summation of ve1ghted
concentrat1ons 1S valid only for randomly collected samples.
Therefore, the Health Assessment (HA) states that there 1S not enough
informat1on ava1lable to evaluate the accuracy of th1S procedure.
(ATSDR)
Response: Although the sOll sampling has not been randomly performed,
there is a consistency betveen soil sampling results conducted by
various 1nvest1gators that prov1des assurance that the sOIl
contaminat1on levels are representative and descriptive of Mill Creek.
Much of the sampl1ng has been conducted in a nonrandom fashion in
order to best character1ze the soil contamination in yards, gardens.
and play areas, 1.e., those areas most likely to contribute to
exposures to res1dents.
2.
Comment: The RI classifies M1Il Creek as suitable for dr1nk1ng,
culInary use, food process1ng, bathIng, svimmIng, and the groving and
propagation of fIshes and assocIated aquatic life. Hovever, the
report does not characterize the extent of use of Mill Creek vater for
these purposes nor does the report state vhether use of M1II Creek
water for any of these purposes vOllld slgn1f1cant1y contribute to the
total ingestIon of arsen1C or cadmIum. (ATSDR)
4-1
-------
Response: The focused nature of the RI on the contamlnated sOlls of
the Mlll Creek communlty precluded extenslve characterlzatlon of the
relative contamlnatlon of the stream or of its contributlon to the
total contaminant exposures at Hill Creek. Such an evaluation may be
conducted as part of future remedial efforts involving surface vaters
in the Anaconda Smelter area, but preliminary studies have indicated
that the creek plays a mlnor role ln the exposures of residents to
contamlnants.
3.
Comment: The RI states that the sex-specificity of the carcinogenic
potency factor for males leads to an overestimation of the risk. The
RA finds this statement dubious, since the rlsk must be calculated to
protect the most sensitlve subpopulation and a risk calculated for the
populatlon as a vhole may fail °to protect the male subpopulation
adequately. (ATSDR)
Response: To calculate cancer risks for contaminants that have
different carcinogenic potency factors for various subpopulations, the
evaluation should be performed so as to protect the most sensitive
subpopulation.
4.
Comment:
The HCL for arsenic vas derived vithout consideration of
carcinogenicity, and is currently under revislon. Therefore,
comparison of calculated excess skin cancer risk from lngestion of
arsenic at Hill Creek to a similarly calculated rlsk for ingestion of
vater vith arsenic at the HCL is questionable. The RI attempts to
justify this approach by pointing out that "comparative risk estimates
based on regulatory thresholds for noncarcinogenic toxic effects are
considered appropriate in the case of arsenic because it is
potentially an essentlal trace element in the human dlet." (ATSDR)
Response: The comparIson of total ingested arsenic dose 1n M111 Creek
to the MCL and the proposed MCLG) at Mill Creek as inapproprIate. See
response to Comment #11 in SectIon 3.1.2 Toxicology.
4-2
-------
In addit1on, the R1Sk Assessment Forum has recently concluded that
data support1ng arsenic as an essential nutritional element are
insufficient~ See response to Comment #1 in Section 3.1.2 Tox1cology
5.
Comment: The HA reasons that the tap-vater samples from the 2-day
sampling perIods, Vh1Ch shoved levels above the HCL, are probably not
representative of the concentrations in ground vater. These samples
vere taken from older, hand-dug vells, vhich tend to be vider and more
exposed than bored vells; therefore, the elevated contaminant levels
1n these vells most llkely represent surface sOll contaminat1on that
has fallen Into the vater sampled. (ATSDR)
Response: Huch of the vell vater used by Hill Creek residents comes
from older, hand-dug vells that are more susceptible to contamination.
Therefore, the tap vater samples shov1ng elevated levels of
contaminants are appropriate for calculating additive exposures. The
poss1ble contam1nat1on of ground vater in the Anaconda Smelter area
vill be evaluated as part of another operable unIt. See pp. A-15
through A-iS of ARARs analysis.
6.
Comment: The RI should expl1citly state that the contribution of sOll
contam1natlon to surface vater contam1nant levels vas considered and
determined to be noncontributary, since the contrlbution of sOll
contamination to surface vater contaminant levels subsequent to
adverse veather events or flooding is not llkely to be sign1flcant 1n
a semi-arid reglon.
(ATSDR)
Response:
See response to Comment #23 in Section 3.1.3 Exposure.
7.
Comment: Knovn exposure to drInkIng vater v1th arsenic levels above
the HCL and accompanYIng elevated urinary arsenIC levels do not
straIghtforwardly translate Into correspondIng abnormalItIes of
peripheral nerve functIon parameters for the folloving reasons:
4-3
-------
(a) EPA (1986) reported that lnfants exposed to acutely tOX1C
arsenic doses ln povdered m1lk are susceptlble to CNS
disorders.
(b) Baker et al. (1977) descrlbed the difficulty of extrapolatlng
from chron1C arsen1C exposure 1n infants vith elevated ur1nary
arsen1C concentrat10ns to acute CNS disorders.
(c) Southvick et al. (1983) compared peripheral nerve function
parameters of res1dents in an area w1th knovn exposure to
arsenic (abo\. the HCL) in dr1nking water to a control
commun1ty and found no differences.
(d) Vallent1ne (1982) ,howed that most measurements of per1pheral
nerve funct10n in residents of high arsen1C exposure
communIties were sufficiently different from such measurements
1n residents of control communities. However, the former were
still v1th1n the range of normal lImits.
(e) Urinary arsenlC concentrat10ns for children in Hill Creek were
reported 1n the RI to be within the range of values for
H1llard, Utah, and high arsenic exposure communIties from the
U.S. cross-sectional studies. (ATSDR)
Response:
See response to Comment #16 in Sect10n 3.1.3 Exposure.
8.
Comment: The r1sk assessment 1n the RI for inhalation of arsen1C
showed a lung cancer risk for Hill Creek in excess of that for the
control commun1ty but less than the risk from exposure to
background-level concentrations. It 1S not made clear 1n the RI how
concentrations that ostens1bly represent background can yield a higher
risk than risk for a community in which 1ndoor air concentrations are
somet1mes elevated.
(ATSDR)
Response: Levels of arsen1C in the air of Hill Creek are above
background.- See response to Comment # 1 in Section 3.1.3 Exposure.
4-4
-------
9.
Comment: The SA concludes that the control community seems to be
poorly chosen 1f it has a calculated excess lung cancer r1sk from
lnhalatlon of cadm1um 1n excess of the risk for Hill Creek. (ATSDR)
Response:
See response to Comment #8 above.
10.
Comment: In terms of a1r sampl1ng, the RI did not expl1c1tly state
whether sampl1ng adequately represent the effects of possible
increases 1n wlnds on a1rborne concentrations, whether such increase
was too small to warrant consideration, or whether 1t vas othervise
incorporated lnto the calculat1ons.
(ATSCR)
Response: Air sampl1ngs vere taken on set schedules so as to avoid
any biases 1mposed by episod1C or per10dic changes in vind patterns.
Additionally, samplers vere operated during different seasons of the
year in order to assess seasonal changes in vind patterns.
11.
Comment: It 1S not clear hov levels ostensibly chosen to represent
background, or a commun1ty chosen as a control, can have a h1gher r1sk
from ingest10n of cadmium than a community vhere children from 9
months to 5 years of age are assumed to ingest soil vith elevated
cadm1um concentrations.
(ATSCR)
Response: It is difficult to identify a control Montana community,
since many commun1ties in Montana may have higher than normal levels
of various contaminants found at smelter sites due to past mining or
smelting act1v1t1es. The calculated risks associated vith cadm1um
ingestion 1n Mill Creek children vould probably be commensurately
higher if all potent1al sources of cadmium ingestion vere 1dent1f1ed
12.
The statement vas made 1n the RI as to vhether such factors
Comment:
as flSh 1ngest10n should be cons1dered.
(ATSCR)
4-5
-------
Response: It vas felt that f1Sh ingestion vould be a relat1Vp.ly minor
source of contam1nant exposure to Mill Creek residents, and spec1flc
informat1on about lngest10n of locally caught fish vas not available.
13.
Comment: No ment10n is made of any assessment of exposure to radon
daughter that have been found in other communities 1n the area as an
apparent result of the ARCO operation. There is some question vhether
ARCO actually sampled soil for mercury at Hill Creek. (ATSDR)
Response:
See response to Comment #5 in Section 3.1.1 Risk
Assessment.
14.
Comment: No ment10n 1S made of any assessment of exposure to mercury
vhich have been found in other communities in the area as an apparent
result of the ARCO operat1on.
(ATSDR)
Response: The focused assessment dealt vith the contaminants found in
the soils of M1ll Creek that vere previously documented through
various CDC studies of biological samples obtained from residents. To
gather radon data uould have delayed the process, contributing to
increased r1sks to residents. Additionally, relatively fey Hill Creek
houses have basements vhere radon vould accumulate to dangerous
levels.
15.
Comment:
The EP d1smissed consideration of the toxic effects of zinc
and copper as ins1gn1f1cant because, for each, the AVQC is based
solely on organoleptic properties (Clement Associates, 1986). The HA
states that a reV1eV of literature suggests possible significant
toxicity from excessive exposure to copper and zinc or from effects of
metals in comb1nat1on (ATSDR). (References are provided 1n the HA).
Response:
TOX1cology.
See response to Comments #31. 32, 33 in Section 3.1.:
4-6
-------
16.
Comment:
If alternatIve 1, "relocation of all res1dents" were
selected, all publIc health risks would be maximally reduced and no
further assessment of "inadequately" addressed questions in the RI
report would be necessary. (ATSDR)
Response: EPA has chosen "relocation of all residents" as the
selected alternative. However, it is EPA's position that the
assessment in the RIfFS was adequate to select the remedial action for
the first operable unit and further evaluation may be required prior
to selection of the final remedy to address contamination in Mill
Creek.
17.
Comment: A comprehens1ve health assessment should be done after the
Record of DecIsion (ROD) is submitted. (ATSDR)
Response: Although additional evaluation may be required, EPA
preferred to conduct a health assessment during the RIfFS prior
ROD in order to help in the remedy selectIon.
to the
18.
Comment: ATSDR agrees wIth the conclusion that a public health risk
exists at Mill Creek if the CAG is valid. (ATSDR)
Response: EPA has reviewed the CAG model and has endorsed it as
relevant and appropriate for use in risk assessments. The CAG potency
factor has been adJusted based upon the 1986 draft Risk Assessment
Forum report. See response to Comment #1 in Section 3.1.2 Toxicology
for a more detailed discussIon.
19.
Comment: . The following flaws in the study of Tseng et a1. (1968) most
likely result 1n 1naccuracy in the calculation of the actual r1sk:
Flaw 1.
Tseng et a1. (1968) assumed that arsenic laden ve1l Jater ~a~
the only exposure route for arsenic ingest10n in Ta1wan.
of rice, fish, pest control compounds were not considered.
The effects
4-7
-------
Flaw 2. Tseng assumed that Taiwan background arsen1C exposure was the
same as that in the U.S. Later studies show a four or twelve times
higher background of blood arsenic in Taiwan than in the U.S.
(Heydorn, 1970).
Flaw 3.
Racial and nutritional deficienc1es between Taiwan and the
u.s. were not cons1dered.
Flaw 4. Biova1lab1lity of arsenic 1ngested in sOll (H1Il Creek) may
not be the same as that of arsenic 1ngested in drinking water
(Taiwan).
(ATSDR)
Response: Flaw 1. Other sources of arsenic are an uncerta1nty that
cannot be answered defin1t1vely because the information 1S simply not
available. Th1S uncertainty has been considered by the Risk
Assessment Forum draft report October, 1986. The Forum calculated
that the dose-response may have been over-estimated by as much as 30%
if a man in the study population ate one cup of dry rice and two
pounds of potatoes per day and that the amount of water (arsenic
contaminated) required to cook the rice and potatoes was about 1.0
liter. But 1t must be emphasized that such speculations are not
supportable by data, and are, therefore, not adequate for risk
assessment purposes.
Flaw 2. The Heydorn (1970) data are of limited use because of the
small sample size (less than 20) and because the sampling protocol is
unknown. Vithout more data or 1ndependent verification, 1t is
inappropriate to make the assumpt10n that all Taiwanese have higher
background blood arsenic levels than do U.s. res1dents.
Flaw 3.
See response to Comment J2 in Sect10n 3.1.2
Tox1cologv
Flaw 4.
See response to Comment #12 1n Section 3.1.3
Exposure.
4-8
-------
20.
Comment:
Flaws 1n the EPA r1sk assessment model for arsenic ingest10n
are apparently reflected 1n the discrepancy between expected and
observed 1nc1dence of sk1n lesions in U.S. subpopulation in areas
which known h1gh drinking water arsenic concentrations. (ATSDR)
Response: None of the proposed populations of u.s. residents exposed
to elevated arsenic meet the conditions required to see a
statlstically significant elevation in skin cancer rates. The
background levels of skin cancer are sufficiently high enough in the
U.S. that elevat10ns of rates due to arsenic will only be cl1nlcally
or epiermiologically apparent when: 1) there is a large enough
population; 2) there is a hlgh level of exposure over a long period of
time; and 3) the population is not mobile. Given the long latency
period for sk1n cancer induced by arsenic, it may take 20 or more
years to see the first cases.
4-9
-------
5.0
REMAINING CONCERNS
Several concerns have been raised that remained unansvered during the RIfFS
period. The Agency's proposed plan to address them is summarized belovo
1.
Concern:
Are there health risks associated vith contaminated soil
that may have been brought into the City of Anaconda?
Response: Migration of contaminated soil is one area of concern for
EPA. This issue viII be addressed under separate operable units at
the Anaconda Smelter NPL site.
2.
Concern: Vhat are the effects of soil and vater contamination on
local agricultural units, especially ranchers? Vhat actions viII EPA
take if contamination is found?
Response: This issue is not directly related to human health; it is
an environmental issue and viII have to be addressed under the
long-term remedial action. The problems in the Deer Lodge Valley are
far-reaching and cannot be resolved quickly. Hovever, soil and water
sampling and effects on cattle viII be examined during the RIfFS
remedial investigation. Possible responses vould include clearing the
soil of contamination or not alloving grazing cattle in those areas if
problems are identified.
It vould be unlikely that ranchers in the valley would be compensated
for economic loss associated with livestock loses under Superfund. At
other Superfund sites across the country livestock ovners have taken
up such issues with the party or parties believed to be responslble
for creating the contamination problem. Superfund is responsible for
cleanup and data collectlon, but not for compensation to individuals
for losses of livestock and crop production. The data that EPA
5-1
-------
collects are public, hovever, and could be used by private individuals
in pursuit of compensation from other sources. To the extent that
money is allocated to Superfund and to the extent that the issues
relate to problems of health and the environment, EPA viII attempt to
address such problems.
5-2
-------
APPENDIX A
LIST OF COMMUNITY RELATIONS ACTIVITIES
FOR THE MILL CREEK nPERABLE UNIT
-------
APPENDI.< A
LIST OF COMMUNITY RELATIDNS ACTIVITIES
FOR THE MILL CREEK OPERABLE UNIT
1.
EstablIshed 1nformatI0n repo~ltor1es at the Hearst Free L1brary and
the Metcalf SenIor C1tIzen's Center 1n Anaconda (October 1984.
2.
Provided communIty relatIons (CR) aSsIstance to CDC 1n coord1nat1ng
unnary arsenIC study (July 1985, IInober 1986).
3.
Held publIC meet1ng to dISCUSS results of urInary arsenIC study (July
9, 1985).
4.
Prepared and dIstl1buted quest1on-answel fact sheet on Superfund
actIvIties related to MIll Creek (Decembel. 1985).
5.
Held publIc meet1ng on Superfund act1vItIes related to MIll Creek.
ReplesentatIves of EPA, CDC, the CIty and County of Anaconda - Deer
Lodge, the EnvIronmental AdvIsory Comm1ttee (EAC), AMC and Its
consultIng contractor, the Montana AIr Quality Bureau. the local
medIa, and the publIC -- a total of approxImately 80 persons (December
10, 1985).
6.
Distributed CDC lettel to Mill Creek res1dents regard1ng
house-cleanIng (December 22, 1985).
7.
Provided assIstance durIng publ1C comment per10d regardIng the EPA
administratIve order on flue dust (D~cembel lqA5 n Januarv 1986).
8.
Held publIc meetIng to announce emergency l~moval actIon~ at MIll
Creek (January 13, 1986).
A-I
-------
9.
Held EAC meetIng to dISCUSS removal optIons (JanuaLJ 28, 1986).
10.
Held publIc meetIng to dISCUSS conSIderatIons regardIng emergency
responses; I.e., cappIng and soddIng (March 29, 1986).
11.
Held publIC meetIng announcIng deCISIon to relocate (May 1, 1986).
12.
Developed communIty RelatIons plan fOl the Anaconda Smelter sIte (Hay
1986).
13.
Held publIC meetIng WIth the EAC to coordInate FEMA actIons (Hay 29,
1986).
14.
Held EAC meetIng updatIng area resIdents on MIll Creek actIvItIes
(July 24, 1986).
15.
ProvIded for communIty relations specIalIst to attend MIll Creek
Resident's AssocIatIon meetIng to lIsten to concerns and coordInate
with EPA and FEMA (September 17, 1986).
16.
Developed a CommunIty RelatIons Plan for the MIll Creek Operable UnIt
Supplement to the CommunIty Relations Plan fo~ the Anaconda Smelter
SIte (October, 1986).
17.
ProvIded for communIty relatIons specIalIst
contact with HIll Creek resIdents regardIng
with concerns and problems. The communIty
available 24 hours a day from Aprll, 1985.
to contInue personal
progress and assIstance
relatIons specIalIst was
18.
Attended monthly or quarterly EAC meetIngs SInce early 1984, and
preparation of CR summarles Slnce AprIl 1Q85.
A-2
-------
APPENDIX.B
LIST OF COMMENTORS
-------
APPENDIX B
LIST OF COMMENTORS
Anaconda - Deer Lodge County, MOlltana
Arrowhead Aplarles
Aspholn, Audrey, Anaconda Communlty Relatlons Speclallst
Atlantic Rlchfleld Company
Citizens of Anaconda Montana
A Concerned Cltlzen
Jane 8. and Allen P. Dudack
Edwln J. Hamel
Kimberly A and Larry D. Hancock
Timothy L. Harrls
Leslle o. Johnson
Yennle Johnson
Helen Meyer
Rlchard Meyer
Sara Yeinstock - results ot telephone survey
Citlzen~ of Mlll Creek, Montana
Helen and Sylvester Haus
Knlght, Dahood, McLeon and Everett - law flrm reple~entlng Mlll Creek
Resldents, lncludlng Floyd C. Bossard and A. Davld Maughan
Hontana Department of Health and Environmental ~r.lences
Montana Department of Health and Human Servlces
B-1
-------
ATTACHMENT II
STATEMENT OF FINDINGS
FLOODPLAINS AND YETLANDS
Executive Order 11988 requlres Federal agencies carrying out their
responsibilities to consider the potential effects of their actions on
floodplains and wetlands in order to secure the beneficial values of these
areas and to minimize the lmpact of floods on human safety. health, and
welfare. The remedial actlon selected by EPA at Mill Creek, Alternative 1
involves activitles located on the floodplaln of Mill Creek. This
Statement of Findings regardlng Floodplains and Yetlands has therefor been
prepared in compliance with Executlve Orders 11988 and 11990.
Alternative 1, relocatlon of all Mill Creek resldents, involves buyout of
all property owners ln the town of Mill Creek, demolition of structures,
grading of the surface, establlshment of vegetation to stabilize the
surface, fencing, and posting as an lnterlm remedlal measure. Because the
structures to be demollshed are located within the floodplain, there is no
practicable alternatlve WhlCh would not be located in a floodplain. Since
the regrading would not affect the surface elevations or contours in the
floodplain, flood flow characterlstics are not anticipated to be changed
within the floodplain of Mill Creek. Establishment of vegetatlon on the
regraded surfaces wlll minimize potential sedlmentation.
.
The Riparian Yoodland/Shrubland vegetatlon unit described in the Mlll Creek
Remedial Investigation meets crlterla as a wetland. Yhile demolition and
regrading work would take place near these areas, no direct disturbance of
wetlands is anticipated. Eroslon of soils lnto wetland areas is
anticipated to be mlnlmlzed by the establishment of vegetatlon.
II-1
-------
Complian~e vlth State Floodplaln Protectlon Standards
The State identlfied the Montana Natural Streambed and Land PreserVatlon
Act as a State ARAR (MCA Section 76-5-101 et seq.j ARM Section 36.15.101,
et seq.) The purpose of the State Floodvay management regulatlons is to
prevent development vlthin the floodplains vhich could cause a flood hazard
or erosion hazard. Since no structures are proposed to be constructed and
appropriate erosion control measures vlll be implemented, the proposed
action vill be in compliance vith the State Floodplain Protection
Standards.
II-2
-------
A TT ACHMENT II I
CONFIDENTIAL ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS
The Atlantic Richf1eld Company (ARCO) has been ident1fied by EPA as the
primary potent1ally responsible party (PRP) for contamination on and around
the Anaconda Smelter slte including contam1nat10n 1n Hill Creek, Montana.
ARCO conducts its business at th1S slte under the name Anaconda M1nerals
Company ("Anaconda" or AMC). Anaconda is now a unlt of ARca Coal WhlCh lS
in turn a division of ARca. A not1ce letter was sent to ARCa on April 29,
1986 pursuant to 122(e) of CERCLA. Special notice was glven September 3,
1987.
A Section 106 adminlstrative order on consent to conduct an RI/FS on the
entire smelter site was signed w1th ARCa on October 22, 1984 (Docket No.
CERCLA VIII-84-08). A preliminary endangerment assessment prepared to
support this order identifled significant skin cancer r1sks from sOll
contaminated by arsenlC from past smelter em1ssions. This contaminated
soil is found over a several square mile area including the community of
Mill Creek. In the course of RIfFS work conducted under the
above-referenced order, it was found in July 1985 that soils in Mill Creek
were highly contaminated by lead, arsenic, and cadmium.
One of the sources of the contamination in M11l Creek is from fugitive
emissions of flue dust off Smelter Hill, WhlCh overlooks M11l Creek. Flue
dust is the most h1ghly contaminated waste on Smelter Hill. On December
20, 1985 (Docket No. CERCLA VIII-85-09), EPA entered lnto a second Sect10n
106 administrative order on consent with ARca to conduct an initial
remedial measure. This order required ARca to inventory flue dust storage
piles located on Smelter H111 (immediately west of Hill Creek), temporarlly
stabilize and ma1ntaln the piles, and control fug1tlve emissions of flue
dust during movement or transport.
On April 19, 1986, Robert L. Duprey, DHector, \laste Management Dl '1<:10n.
EPA Region VIII, sIgned an actIon memorandum inItIatIng a removal actlon to
III-l
-------
temporar1ly relocate fam1l1es Y1th ch1ldren or other sens1tive indivlduals
and ln1tiat1ng a road dust suppresslon program ln M1ll Creek. On Aprll 29,
1986, a PRP notice letter yas sent to ARCO descr1bing its potent1al
liability under subsection 107(a)(3) of CERCLA as a generator of stack and
fugitive emissions from the Anaconda Smelter yhich contaminated Mill Creek
and offer1ng ARCO the opportun1ty to conduct the temporary relocation and
road dust suppreSSlon programs described in the action memorandum. In a
response dated Hay 2, 1986, ARCO declined the opportunity to conduct the
temporary relocation and accepted the opportunity to conduct the road dust
suppression program.
On June 9, 1986, EPA entered into a third Section 106 administrative order
on consent with ARCO requ1rlng specified road dust suppression measures
(Docket No. CERCLA VIII-86-06). In a fund-financed effort, 14 families
were temporarily relocated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEHA).
On July 1, 1986, EPA entered lnto a fourth Section 106 administrative order
on consent with ARCO requlrlng a special, expedlted RI/FS addressing Mill
Creek alone (Docket NO. CERCLA VIII-86-07). The draft Hill Creek RI/FS was
released for public comment ln December of 1986 with the public comment
period closing on February 4, 1987. EPA received numerous comments from
the residents of H1ll Creek as well as ARCO. ARCO's comments were
voluminous and raised many technlcal and legal issues. Consistent with
their previous posltlon, ARCO contlnued to dispute all aspects of the EPA
risk assessment. EPA has responded to all public comments in the
responsiveness summary.
The EPA Office of General Counsel has indicated that the Agency can compel
ARCO to conduct a permanent relocatlon pursuant to Sect10n 106 of CERCLA.
Negotiation of a Judlclal consent decree pursuant to Section 106 is
anticipated in the near future. Cost recovery under Section 107 of CERCLA
of EPA expenses assoclated ~lth Mlll Creek Ylll be deferred to a later
action. If negot1atlons of a consent decree fall, a fund f1nanced
permanent relocat1on may be pref~rable to a unilateral judicial action.
I11-2
-------
ANACONDA SHELTER SITE
MILL CREEK, MONTANA
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
October 1, 1987
Prepared by
HEIC/
Contract Evidence Audit Team (CEAT)
Prepared tor
Rex Callaway
EPA Reqion VIII
Ottice ot Reqional Counsel
This work is beinq conducted on beha1t ot the Environmental
Protection Aqency's (EPA) National Entorcement Investiqations
Center (HEIC) under EPA contract no. 68-01-7369.
-------
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREE~ MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
1121/91/87 ADMINIS~RATIYE RECORD INDEX' p,
FiLE;.2027~0i.s-==..=NUM8ER~.i0000i=.._..~..DATE~.00i00i00-========PAG;l11
TITLE/SUBJECTl YELLOW COVER SHEET ENTITLEDI SECTION '3-~ STANDARD OPER~'
PROCEDURES (~LL ~PPLICA8LE S~MPLES) !,
~UTHORI NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZ~TIONI NOT INDICATED
ADDRESSEE. NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATIONI NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE I MISCELLANEOUS
------------------------------------------------------------------------.
FILEI 2021601
TITLE/SUBJECT I
AUTHOR.
ORGAN I ZATIONI
ADDRESS£E I
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
REPORT N~~~!~~ E6 ~e~~~NDARD OPE ~+T ~G 1 ~~~~~g~RES PAGES \
DISCUSSION OF (SOPs) TO DESCRIBE PROCEDURES PERFORMED IN 1
FIELD & LAB. PROCEDURES FOR E~CH FIELD TASK HAVE BEEN
DESCRIBED IN A FIELD OPERATION PLAN
-------
~ ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
.~~~;~~~=========.=._.=::~~~~!~!~!~~~Z~~::;~~:2:!~2~~:~:==============~~~;~==;
FILE. 2021601 NUMBER. 100007 D~TE. 12/00/84 PAGES: 3.3
TITLE/SUBJECT. REPORT ENTITLED: lABORATORY ANALYTICAL PROTOCOL
AUTHOR. NOT INDICATED
ORG~NIZATION. TETR~ TECHL INC.
ADDRESSEE. NOT INDICArED
ORGANIZATION, ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC>
DOCUMENT TYPE. REPORT/STUDY
----------------------------------------------------------------------------~-
FILE. 2021601
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION,
ADDRESSEE,
ORGAN I ZAT I ON,
DOCUMENT TY PE .
NUMBER, 100008 DATE. 07/00/84
COVER SHEET ENTITLED: APPENDIX A - CONTR~CT
PROGR~"'\ ST~TEMENT OF WORK, JULY, 1984
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MISCELLANEOUS
PAGES, 1
LABORATORY
------------------------------------------------------------------------~-~~~
FILE. 2021601
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGAN I ZAT I ON.
DOCUMENT TY PE .
" .
NUMBER. 100009 DATE. 07/00/84 PAGES. 228
REPORT ENTITLED: CONTRACT LAeORATORY PROGRAM, STATEMENT OF
WORK
-------
~NACONDA SMELTER SITE
MIll CREE~ MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/87 ADMINIS~RATIVE RECORD INDEX p
.......==,.8.==========....=-==-.=..................=......,.=-==.._=........\
FILEI 2021601 NUMBER I 100014 DATE I 01/00/8~ Pj:\Gfl/!
TITLE/SUBJECT I ~N~COND~ SMELTER R I /FS LABORATORY ~N~L YT I C~L PROTOCOL; ,.,
~MENDMENT TO DOCUMENT CONTROL NO. TTB-030FO '
(CL~RIFIC~TIONS ~ND CH~NGES)
~UTHOAI NOT INDIC~TED
ORG~NIZ~TIONI NOT INDIC~TED
~DDRESSEEI NOT INDIC~TED
ORG~NIZ~TIONI NOT INDIC~TED
DOCUMENT TYPE I REPORT/STUDY
-----------------------------------------------------------------------~
~.'
FILE I 2021601
TITLE/SUBJ'ECTI
AUTHOR I
ORGAN IZ~TI ON I
ADDRESSEE I
ORG~NIZATIONI
DOCUI'IENT TYPE I
NlJII'BER I 10001 ~ DATE I 00/00/00 P~GEc
YELLOW COVER SHEET ENT I TLED I SECT I ON 14-B - GROUNDW~TER \
FIELD OPER~TIONS PLAN (~LL ~PPLICABLE S~MPLES)
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDICATED
MISCELLANEOUS
-----------------------------------------------------------------------~
FILE. 2021601
T 1 TLE/SUBJECT I
AUTHOR.
ORG~NIZATION.
ADDRESSEE I
ORG~NIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 100016 DATE. 04/0e/8~
REPORT ENTITLED. FINAL - FIELD OPERATIONS PLAN
INVESTIGATION SUBTASK - GROUNDWATER SAMPLING
NOT INDICATED
TETRA TECHL INC.
NOT INDICA rED
~NACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC)
REPORT/STUDY
..
PAGES
- MASTER II
-----------------------------------------------------------------------\~
FILE. 2021601
Tl TLE/SUBJECT I
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE I
ORGAN I ZATIONI
DOCUMENT TYPE I
NUMBER. 100017 DATE. 00/00/00 PAGES'
YELLOW CtWER SHEET ENT I TLED I SECT I ON 16-B - HEALTH EFFECTI
SOILS INVESTIGATION DATA REPORT (50-012) . . .
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MISCELLANEOUS
------------------------------------------------------------------------,
FILE. 2021601
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
MJl'lBER. 100018 DATE. 07/ 00/ 8~ . P~GES I'
REPORT ENTITLE!h HEALTH EFFECTS - SOILS INVESTIGATION Dt:ml,
REPORT . .
NOT INDICATED
TETRA TECHL INC.
NOT INDICA rED
ANACONDA MINERALS COI'IPANY (AMe)
REPORT/STUDY
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE I 2021601
TITLE/SUBJECT I
AUTHOR.
ORGANI.ZATION.
, ADDMESSEE.
ORGAN I ZATICW.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
---------
FILE. 2021601
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE I
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUI'IENT TYPE.
AAGESI,
NUMBER. 100019 DATE. 08/00/86
REPORT ENTITLED. QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURES
NOT INDICATED
ROCKY MOUNTAIN ANALYTICAL LABORATORY
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
----------------------------------------------------------
NUMBER. 100020 DATE I 12/0~/84
LABORATORY NOTEBOOK ASSIGNED TO GRETCHEN RUPP
RUPP\ GRETCHEN
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MISCELLANEOUS
AAGESI
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
AN~COND~ SMELTER SITE
, MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
~~~~~~~~=----==-===-==_.__~2~:~:~!~~!:~:.~:~~~2=;~~~~=.=..=.===.======~:~~~==:
~ILE. 2021601 NUMBER. 100021 DATE. 00/00/00 'PAGES. 1
TITLE/SUBJECT. COVER SHEET APPENDIX D - DEEP TILL PILOT STUDY
(MARGINALIA. ANACONDA/MILL CREEK RI REPORT)
AUTHOR, NOT INDICATED
ORG~NIZATION. NOT INDICATED
ADDRESSEE. NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION, NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE, MISCELLANEOUS
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
, FILE. 2021601
TITLE/SU8.1ECT.
AUTHOR.
ORGAN I ZAT ION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGAN I Z~T ION.
DOCUMENT TY PE .
NUMBER. 100022
REPORT ENTITLED. MILL
DEEP TILL PILOT STUDY
NOT INDIC~TED
TETRA TECH!. INC.
NOT INDICArED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
DATE. 09/00/86 PAGES. 16
CREEK RI/FS TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO.~
-------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~~~
FILE. 2021601
TITLE/SU8.1ECT.
AUTHOR.
ORG~NIZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGAN I Z~T ION I
DOCUMENT TY PE .
NUMBER I 100023
COVER SHEET ENTITLED:
TEST
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MISCELLANEOUS
DATE I 00/00/00 PAGES, 1
APPENDIX E - SOIL COLUMN LEACH BENCH
----------~---------------------------------------------------------------~~~=
',PILEI 2021601 NUMBER. 100024 DATE. 09/00/86 PAGES. 21
TITLE/SUBJECT. REPORT ENTITLED: MILL CREEK RI/FS TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO.6
SOIL COLUMN LEACH BENCH TEST
~ AUTHOR I NOT INDICATED
RGANIZATIONI' TETRA TECH!. INC.
ADDRESSEE. NOT INDICA fED
ORGANIZATION. NOT INDICATED
. DOCUMENT TYPE., REPORT/STUDY
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------~
FILE I 2021601
TITLE/SUBJECT I
AUTHOR.
ORGAN I ZATIONI
ADDRESSEE.
ORGAN I ZAT I ON .
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER I 10002~ DATE. 03/07/86 PAGES. 6
DISCUSSION OF TAT MEMBERS PERFORMING QUANITATIVE ANALVSIS
ON SOIL SAMPLES COLLECTED IN ~ILL CREEK MONTAN~ UTILIZING
AN X-MET 840 PORTABLE X-RAY FLUORESENCE AN~LYZER IN A LAB
AT BUTTE ON 2/18/86 - 2/21/86~ ALSO DISCUSSES S~MPLING EVENT
-2 & -3~LAB Q/A~AND SAMPLE CU~TODY AND TRACMING
STEVENSuN PETE"
TECHNICAL'ASSISTANCE TEAM (TAT) REGION VIII
NICHOLS\ FLOYD D.
USEPA-VIII
MEMO
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------~
FILEI 2021603
TI TLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
DQORGAN I Z~T I ON I
CUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 100014 DATE I 07/00/87 PAGES. 440
MDATA UTILIZATION MILL CREEK MONTANA - ANACONDA SMELTER
SITE\ ANACOND~, MONTANAM (CONTAINS APPENDICES A THROUGH F)
NOT INDICATED
CAMP DRESSER & McKEE, INC. (CDM)
NOT INDICATED
USEPA-VIIIb MONTAN~ OFFICE
REPORT/STU Y
--------------------7-------------------------------------------------------~-
-------
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK ~ONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/87 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX p
_=2==============..==._...2.=......==-...-.---.===.==.==============__1
FILE: 2021605 NUMBER: 100002 DATE: 09/30/86 p~
TITLE/SUBJECT: LISTING THE CIRCU~STANCES BEYOND REASONABLE CONTROL OF: I
ANACONDA WH I CH RESUL TED I N THE SUBM I SS I ON OF THE DAT~ ' II
VALIDATION ON SEPTEMBER 19, AND A REQUEST TO NOT BE
~ENALIZED FOR THE' DELAY.
AUTHOR: DAVIS JACK R.
ORGANIZATION: ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC)
ADDRESSEE: WARDELL JOHN
ORGANIZATION: USE~A-V~II, MONTANA OFFICE
DOCUMENT TY~E: LETTER
FILE: 202160~
TITLE/SUBJECT:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------~,
,"'
AUTHOR:
ORG~NIZATIONs
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100003 DATE: 09/24/86 PAG~
REGARD I NG THE CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS RELAT I NG TO THE DAT~ 'I\!
VALIDATION OF NEW DATA GENERATED AND REANALYSIS REQUIRED:!/!
THE MILL CREF~ RI/FS.
LYTLE, CHARLES R.
TETRA TECHk INC.
g~~~5ND~A~IN~RALS COMPANY (AMC)
LETTER
------------------------------------------------------------------------
il~,l
FILE s 2021606 NUMBER s 100001 DATE s 09/11 /86 PAGESJIWIJ
TITLE/SUBJECT: DISCUSSES THE 16 SOIL PROFILES OBTAINED AT MILL CREEK
APPEARING TO BE SUFFICIENT TO DETERMINE A DEPTH OF REMOVA
FOR THE PURPOSES OF A FEASIBILITY STUDY. ALSO DISCUSSES ""
DIFFERENT ACTION LEVELS FOR DEPTH OF REMOVAL
(INTERNAL DOCU~ENT CONTROL NO. 228-TS1-EP-DFWH-1)
AUTHOR: SULLIVAN JEFF
ORGANIZATIONs CAMP DRESSER & McKEE, INC. (CDM)
ADDRESSEEs BISHOP MIKE
ORGANIZATION: USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
DOCUMENT TYPE s LETTER j!
--------------------------------------------------------------------~:I!
FILEs 2021606 NU~BER: 100002 DATE: 09/11/86 PAGJI
TITLE/SUBJECT: DISCUSSES THE 16 SOIL PROFILES OBTAINED AT THE MIl.L. CREit
SITE APPEARING TO 8E SUFFICIENT TO DETERMINE DEPTH 0'
REMOVAL FOR THE PURPOSES OF A FEASIBILITY STUDY. ALSO
DISCUSSES DIFFERENT ACTION LEVELS FOR DEPTH OF REMOVAL.
(INTERNAL DOCUMENT CONTROL NO. 228-TS1-EP-DFWH-1)
AUTHOR: SULLIVAN JEFF
ORGANIZATIONs CAMP DRESSER & ~cKEE, INC. (CDM)
ADDRESSEE. BISHOP MIKE
ORGANIZATIONs USEPA-VIII, ~ONTANA OFFICE
DOCUMENT TYPE: LETTER
-------------------------------------------------------------------_____~i
FILE: 2021606
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUJIISER: 100003 DATE: 12/ 1 ~/ 86 P~GES.
TRANSMITTAL OF TWO DOCUMENTS DISCUSSING THE ADEQUACY OF TH~
MILL. CREEK SOIL PROFILES. DOCUMENT PROVIDES CONCLUSIONS
FOR 80TH DOCU~ENTS TRANSMITTED.
(INTERNAL DOCUMENT CONTROL NO. 228-TS1-EP-DSGW-1)
SULLIVAN JEFF
CAMP DRESSER & McKEE, INC. (CDM)
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
MEMO
-------------------------------------------------------------------------.
FILE: 2021606
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION.
DOCU~ENT TYPE:
PAGES.
NUMBERs 100004 DATEs 12/1~/86E
REPORT ON "ANALYSIS OF SPLIT SAMPLES"
DOCUMENT ANALYZES DATA SPLITS TO ASSESS
WHETHER THE TETRA TECH SOIL PROFILE DATA, CURRENTLY CL~SS-
IFIED AS ESTIMATES, CAN BE UTILIZED.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
-----------------------------------------------------------------------.
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
.10/01/87 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX Page: ~
~===.a=================~==============================--------====----------_:
ILE. 2021606 NU~BER. 100004A DATE. 12/1~7a6---- -PAGES:-8-~-
ITLE/SUBJECT. REPORT ON IIASSESSMENTOF DATA ADEQUACY" .
DOCUMENT ANALYZES THE ADEnUACY OF EXISTING DATA TO
DETERMINE IF SUFFICIENT DATA ARE AVAILABLE TO ACCURATELY
COST THE SOIL REMOVAL REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVE
NOT IND ICATED .
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
AUTHOR:
ORGAN I ZAT ION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGAN I ZAT I ON:
. DOCUMENT TY PE .
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i FILE. 2021606
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
ORGAN I Z~T ION.
. ADDRESSEE.
ORGAN I ZAT I ON:
DOCUMENT TY PE .
NU~BER. 10000~
ATTACHMENT - DISCUSSION
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
D~TE. 00/00/00 PAGES: 17
OF THE VARIOGRA/'II AND KRIGING
------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~~~~
,FILE. 20Z1607
. TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
ORGAN I ZAT I ON.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGAN I ZAT I ON.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 100001 DATE. 10/17 / 8~ PAGES: ;:
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE METHODS AND RESULTS OF THE X-MET
840 XRF ANALYZER CALIBRATION FOR ANACONDA SOIL SAMPLES.
(INTERN~L DOCUMENT NO. 2a8-TSI-EP-BUVM-1)
CHAPPELL!. RICK
NOT INDII.,;ATED
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-~III, MONTAN~ OFFICE
MEMO
----------------------------------------------------------------------------~=
FILE. 2021607
JTLE/SUB.1Ei:TI
, ~UTHOR.
: ORGANIZATION.
I ADDRESSEE.
ORGAN I ZATION.
DOCUMENT TY PE .
NUMBER. 100002 DATE. 10/22/8~ PAGES: 1
RESULTS OF SIX ANACONDA SOIL SAMPLES SENT WITH THE X-MET 640
USING THE CURRENT CALIBRATION. THE SAMPLES WERE ANALYZED TO
CHECK THE ACCURACY OF THE X-MET 840.
(INTERNAL DOCUMENT NO. 22S-TS1-EP-BVDF-1)
CHAPPELL!. RICK
NOT INDII.,;~TED
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-~III, MONTANA OFFICE
MEMO
---------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~
FILE. 2021607
TITLE/SUBJECT.
: AUTHOR.
i ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE I
ORGAN I ZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 100003 D~TE. 03/17/86
SUMMARY OF ALL RESULTS TO DATE OF THE ANACONDA
ANALYZED WITH THE X-MET 840 XRF ANALYZER
(INTERNAL DOCUMENT NO. 2Z8-TS1-EP-CHlH-1)
CHAPPELL RICK' .
C~~P DRESSER & McKEE, INC. (CDM)
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-~III, MONT~NA OFFICE
MEMO
PAGES. 4
SOIL SAMPLES
---------------------------------------------------------------------------~-~
FILE. 2021607 NUMBER. 100004 DATE I 03/17/86 PAGES. 4
TITLE/SUBJECT. SUMM~RY OF ALL RESULTS TO DATE OF THE ANACONDA SOIL SAMPLES
ANALYZED WITH THE X-MET 840 XRF ANALYZER
(INTERNAL DOCUMENT NO. 228-TS1-EP-CHLH-1)
AUTHOR. CH~PPELl RICK
~ ORGANIZATION. CAMP DRESSER & McKEE, INC. (CDM)
ADDRESSEE I BISHOP MIKE
'IDORGANIZATION. USEPA-~I I I, MONTANA OFFICE
'w OCUMENT TYPE I MEMO
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------~
,,-
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONT~N~ OPER~BLE UNIT
10/01/87 ~DMINISTR~TIVE RECORD INDEX P~ge: 7
==================~..=a=~==~a....===--..a.....--a===~a======.======~==~======-
FILE. 2021607 NUMBERs 100004~ D~TEI 03/17/86 PAGES. 4 -
TITLE/SUBJECTs SUMMAijY OF ~LL RESULTS 10 D~TE OF THE ANACONDA SOIL SAMPLES
~NALYZED WITH THE X-MET 1840 XRF ~NALYZER
(INTERNAL DOCUMENT NO. 2a8-TS1-EP-CHLH-1)
CHAPPELL RICK .
C~MP DRESSER & McKEE, INC. (CDM)
BISHOP MIKE '
USEPA-~III, MONTANA OFFICE
MEMO
~UTHORI
ORGANIZATIONs
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 2021607
TITLE/SUBJECT.
~UTHOR .
ORG~NIZ~1'IONI
ADDRESSEE.
ORG~NIZ~TIONI
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER I 10000~ DATE I 07/09/86
DISCUSSION OF XRF AN~LYSIS OF MILL CREEK SOIL
G~/GC RESULTS I
(INTERN~L DOCUMENT NO. 2a8-TS1-EP-CYCA-1)
DOCUMENT INCLUDES FIG.S 1-~ (GRAPHS)
CHAPPELL RICK
CAMP DRESSER & McKEE, INC.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------.
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONT~N~ OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/87 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX PC'ge: E:
.=====================~================-=------=====.=z-=--------~=-----------
~FILEI Z021607 NUMBER: 100010 - ---CATE, OS/23/86------- PAGES~-4---
TITLE/SUBJECT I DISCUSSION OF SAMPLING ACTIVITIES CONDUCTED AT MILL CREEK
MONTANA, INCLUDES SUMMARIES OF THREE SAMPLING EVENTS.
SAMPLES WERE ANALYZED USING THE X-MET 840 FLOURESCENCE
SPECTROPHOTOMETER
WHITTENHAGEN DIANE K.
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TEAM (TAT) REGION VIII
NICHOLSt FLOYD D.
USEP~-V.LII
MEMO
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TV PE .
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE I 2021607
TITLE/SUBJECT.
~UTHOR .
ORG~NIZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORG~N I ZA-T I ON.
DOCUMENT TYPE I
NUMBER I 100010A DATE I 06/11/86 PAGES: 3
DISCUSSION OF MILL CREEK SAMPLE SELECTION FOR CLP METALS
ANALYSIS
CHAPPELLJ,. RICK
NOT INDI~ATED
ERICKSONJ,. JIM
NOT INDI~ATED
MEMO
-------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~~-
FILE. 2021607
TITLE/SUBJECT.
~UTHOR .
ORG~N I ZAT I ON.
ADDRESSEE I
ORGAN I ZAT I ON.
DOCUMENT TY PE .
NUMBER. 100011 DATE. 07/09/86 PAGES: 12
DISCUSSION OF XRF ANALYSIS OF MILL CREEK SOIL SAMPLES AND
GA/GC RESULTS ALONG WITH ~ BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE SAMPLE
PREPARATION, AND CALIBRATION, DOCUMENT INCLUDES FIG.S 1-4
(GRAPHS) .
CHAPPELL RICK
CAMP DRESSER & McKEE, INC. (CDM)
HILLMAN\ JUANITA
USEPA-VJ.II
MEMO
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~-~=
IF.ILE' 2021607
ITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR,
ORG~N I ZAT I ON:
ADDRESSEE I
ORGAN I ZAT I ON I
DOCUMENT TV PE .
NUMBER. 100012 DATEI 00/00/86
APPENDIX B - EVALUATION OF CDM'S X-MET ANALYSIS OF
CREEK SOIL SAMPLES AND GA/GC RESULTS (GRIEB 1986)
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
PAGES: 12
MILL
'---------------------------------------------------------------------------~~=
i FILE. 2021608 NUMBER. 100001 DATE I 11/24/86 PAGES. 1
: TITLE/SUBJECT. REGARDING THE CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY OF THE SAMPLES COLLECTED BY
THE WESTON TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TEAM IN ~ILL CREEK, MONTANA.
~UTHORI ALMGUIST GERALD L.
ORG~NIZATIONI ROY F. WESTON" INC./SPER
ADDRESSEE I CHEATHAM RICHARD
ORGANIZATION' CAMP DRESSER & McKEE, INC. (CDM)
DOCUMENT TYPEs MEMO
I~_____----------------------------------------------------------------------~=
I FILE I 2021608
, TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
CRGAN I ZAT I ON.
ADDRESSEE I
ORG~N I ZAT I ON.
I DOCUMENT TY PE I
, NUMBERs 100002 DATE. 00/00/00 PAGES, 3
~ LIST OF SAMPLE NUMBERS DATE COLLECTED AND THE DATE
RELEASED TO COM. (DATE COLLECTED--RANGING FROM 2/17/86 TO
4/24/861 DATE RELEASED--4/30/86 AND ~/~/86)
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
HANDWRITTEN NOTES
----------------------------------------------------------------------------~~
-------
AN~CONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/87 ADMINISTR~TIVE RECORD INDEX Page-
..a=====.==========~a==............_.....a.a_=====~.=a==-~============== '
FILEs 2021608 NUMBERs 100003 D~TEs 0~/23/86 PAGe jl
TITLE/SUBJiCT. SUMMARY OF SAMPLING ACTIVITIES CONDUCTED AT MILL CREEK, ~
LODGE COUNTY1 MONTANA BETWEEN FEBRUARY 17, 1986 AND
APRIL 241 19~6. CASE. M85643.
AUTHORs WHITTENHRGEN DIANE K.
ORGANIZATIONs TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TEAM
-------
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
, MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
It~~~~~================--~~~!~!~!~~!!~~-~~~~~~_!~~~~-----------------~~~:~-~,
, E~ Z021606 NUMBER;-10000~-------~-DATE~-03/13/87---------PAGES~-7--~
LE/SUBJECT: A COMPLETED SPECIAL ANALYTICAL SERVICES
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONT~N~ OPER~BLE UNIT
10/01/87 ~DMINIS,"R~TIVE RECORD INDEX Pt.
FiLE~=202i60a========NUMBER~=7000i:==~======D~TE~=03i26ie7=========p~Gr;
TITLE/SUBJECTs FEDER~L EXPRESS ~IRBILL INDICATING A PACKAGE WAS SENT Tol
. KATHY HUTCHINSON OF ROCKY MOUNTAIN ANALYTICAL. !
AUTHOR. ASHENBERG DANIEL.
ORGANIZATIONs CAMP DRESSER & McKEE, INC. CCDM)
ADDRESSEE: HUTCHINSON KATHY
ORGANIZATION: ROCKY MOUNTAIN ~NALYTICAL LABORATORY CRMAL)
DOCUMENT TYPE. MISCELLANEOUS
------------------------------------------------------------------------j
FILE. 20?1608 NUMBER. 100014A DATEr 03/24/87 PAGES I;
TITLE/SUBJECTs COPIES OF PAGES FROM A FIELD BOOK INDICATING SAMPLING DAT~
TIME, HOUSE NUMBER, NAME~ AND SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION, AND ~
LIST OF THE SAMPLE ID_, I AG I, BOTTLE LOT I, SAS I, eoe .,~
AND REMARKS. I
ASHENBERG1 DANIEL
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
HANDWRITTEN NOTES
~UTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZ~TION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
------------------------------------------------------------------------.
FILE. 2021608
TITLE/SUBJECTs
AUTHOR.
ORGAN I Z~TIONs
~DDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 10001~ D~TE. 03/27/87 PAGES1:
TRANSMITTAL OF DRINKING WATER SPLIT SAMPLES THAT WERE
COLLECTED AT RESIDENCES IN MILL CREEK BY CAMP DRESSER &
MCKEE INC. ON 3/24/87 AND 3/2~/87, AND A LIST OF SAMPLE
IDENT1FICATION NUMBERSb RESIDENT'S NAMES~ SAMPLE LOCATION
MAP~ AND CHAIN OF CUST DY FORMS. CUNSIGN~D)
ASH~NeERG DANIEL
CAMP DRESSER & McKEE, INC. CCDM)
DOLE STEPHEN E.
ANACbNDA MINERALS COMPANY CAMC)
LETTER.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEs 2021608
TITLE/SUBJECTs
~UTHOR s
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATIONs
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER s 100016 DATE. 00/00/00 PAGE.
A LIST OF HOUSE NUMBERS, RESIDENTS, COMMENTS, AND THE
SAMPLE ID NUMBER, AND A MAP OF THE TAP WATER SAMPLING
LOCATIONS.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MISCELLANEOUS
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEs 2021608
TITLE/SUBJECT.
~UTHOR .
ORGANIZATION.
~DDRESSEEs
ORGANIZATIONs
DOCUMENT TYPEs
NUMBER. 100016A D~TE. 03/24/87E ~GE51
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORDS--DOCUMENTATION OF UNFILTERED
AND ACIDIFIED (WITH HN03) SAMPLES TAKEN FOR THE ANACONDA/
MILL CREEK PROJECT, PROJECT NO. 228.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MISCELLANEOUS
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEs 2021608
TITLE/SUBJECTs
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATIONs
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATIONs
DOCUMENT TYPEs
NUMBERs 100017 DATEs 03/27/87
FEDERAL EXPRESS AIRBILL -- INDICATING A PACKAGE
MR. STEVE DOLE OF THE ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MISCELLANEOUS
P~GE51
WAS SENT i
BY CDM.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
~. MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
~. .10/01/87 ADMINIStRATIVE RECORD INDEX Page: 1-
.===========================---------=====~=========--------------------------
FILE. 2021608 NUMBER.-100017A- DATE: 03;27;87E--------PAGES~-2---
TITLE/SUBJECT. CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD--INDICATION THAT SPLIT SAMPLES ~ERE
RECEIVED ON 4/3/87 AND THE COC RECORD ~AS SIGNED BY A
"STEVE VINCENT"
AUTHOR: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION. NOT INDICATED
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: MISCELLANEOUS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~-~-
FILEI 2021608
TI TLE/SUBJECT .
AUTHOR.
ORGAN I ZAT I ON.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE I
NUMBER I 100018 DATE. 04/20/87 PAGES: 5
SAS -- SUMMARY OF INORGANIC DATA QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIE~ --
REGION VIII: QC REPORT NUMBER ~6786--INDICATING DATA ARE
ACCEPTABLE FOR USE.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------~------~-~~----~-~~-~~=~
ILE: 2021608
ITLE/SUBJECT I
AUTHOR.
ORGAN I ZAT I ON I
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE I
NUMBER. 10001g DATE I 04/14/87
INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEETS - QC REPORT NUMBER
INDICATING ELEMENTS IDENTIFIED AND MEASURED.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
PAGES: 20
56785;
-----------------------------------------------------------------~------~~~~=~
FILE I 2021608
JITLE/SUBJECT I
AUTHOR I
ORG~N I ZAT I ON I
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TY PE .
NUMBER. 100020 DATE I 04/20/87 PAGES. 5
SAS -- SUMMARY OF INORGANIC DATA QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIE~ --
REGION VIII: QC REPORT NUMBER ~6786--INDICATING DATA ARE
ACCEPTABLE FOR USE WITH QUALIFICATIONS NOTED.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
---------------------------------------------------------------------~---~~~~~
FILE I 2021608
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATIONI
ADDRESSEE.
ORGAN I ZAT I ON.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 100021 DATEI 04/14/87
INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEETS - QC REPORT NUMBER
INDICATING ELEMENTS IDENTIFIED AND MEASURED.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
PAGES, 2:
~6766;
-------------------------------------------------------------------------~-~=~
FILE I 2021608
TITLE/SUBJECT I
AUTHOR.
ORGAN I ZAT I ON I
ADDRESSEE.
ORGAN I ZAT I ON I
DOCUMENT TYPE I
NUMBER. 100022 DATE I 04/0g/87 PAGES, 27
INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA P~CKAGE --QC REPORT NUMBER 56766:
INCLUDES COVER PAGE, NARRATIVE, ANALYSIS DATA SHEETS AND
RESUL TS.
NOT INDICATED
ROCKY MOUNTAIN ANALYTICAL LABORATORY (RMAL)
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
----------------------------------------------------------------------------~-
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
. MILL CREEK'r MONT~N~ OPER~BLE UNIT
10/01/87 ~DMINIS R~TIVE RECORD INDEX p II
-=.=-===================.~.=~.~===========_a========================="
FILEr 202161218 NUMBER: 100023 D~TEr 04/0~/87 p~G
TITLE/SUBJECTr INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA PACKAGE -- ac REPORT NUMBER ~G7
.INCLUDES COVER PAGE, ANALYSIS DATA SHEETS, AND RESULTS.
AUTHOR: NOT INDICATED
dRGANIZATION: ROCKY MOUNTAIN ANALYTICAL LABORATORY (RMAL)
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZ~TION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPEr REPORT/STUDY
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021608
TITLE/SUBJECTr
~UTHORr
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORG~NIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 100024 D~TE. 07/0~/86 P~GES'
"COMPILATION OF DATA COLLECTED BY EP~ IN THE VICINITY O~'
MILL CREEKt MONTAN~"--COVER SHEET AND TABLE OF CONTENTS.
NOT INDICA ED
CAMP DRESSER & McKEE, INC. (CDM)
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
-------------------------------------------------------------------------,
FILE. 2021608
TITLE/SUBJECT.
~UTHOR.
ORGANIZATION:
~DDRESSEE.
ORG~NIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER. 10002:5 DATE. 0:5/23/86' P~GES'
"COMPILATION OF D~T~ COLLECTED BY EP~ IN THE VICINITY OF .
MILL CREEKJ. MONTAN~"--SECTION 1. 0--INTRODUCTION AND T~BLE
WHICH LIST~ THE MILL CREEK SURVEY D~TA WHICH ARE PRESENTLY
AVAILABLE.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 2021608
TITLE/SUBJECT.
~UTHOR:
ORG~NIZATION.
ADDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZATIONr
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER: 100026 DATE. 00/00/00 P~GES:
NCOMPILATION OF DATA COLLECTED BY EP~ IN THE VICINITY OF
MILL CREEKL MONTAN~"--SECTION 2.0--(SECTION DIVIDER) .
WESTON-SPE~ (TAT): YARD SOIL S~MPLES AND SOIL PROFILE
AN~L YSES.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021608
TITLE/SUBJECTr
AUTHOR:
ORG~NIZATIONs
ADDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBERs 100026~ DATE: 00/00/00 PAGES:
"COMPILATION OF DATA COLLECTED BY EPA IN THE VICINITY OF
MILL CREEKJ. MONT~N~"--SECTION 2.0--WESTON-SPER (TAT)
Y~RD SOIL ~AMPLES ANALYSIS DAT~ (IN ALPHABETICAL ORDER
BY RESIDENT)
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEs 2021608
TITLE/SUBJECTs
AUTHORs
ORGANIZATIONs
ADDRESSEEs
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPEs
NUMBERs 100027 DATE. 06/04/86 PAGES,
.COMPILATION OF D~T~ COLLECTED BY EP~ IN THE VICINITY OF
MIL1. CREEK MONTAN~I'--SECTION 2. 0--TRANSMITT~L OF THE,
PRELIMINAR~ RESULTS OF SOIL PROFILE ~N~LYSES~ DESCRIPTION'~
SAMPLING DEPTHS, AND SAMPLING 1.0CATION MAP O~ THE COMMUNITY
OF MILL CREEK.
ERICSON JAMES W.
CAMP DRESSER & McKEE, INC. (CDM>
DOLE STEPHEN E.
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC>
LETTER
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONT~N~ OPERABLE UNIT
~~1/87 ~DMINISTR~TIVE RECORD INDEX Page: l~
=======================================-------=========----------------------
F; : a0216~8 NUMBER: 100028 ----OATE: ~6/04/86---------PAGES~-8---
'IITLE/SUBJECT: "COMPILATION OF DATA COLLECTED BY EPA IN THE VICINITY OF
MILL CREEK, MONTANA"--.SECTION 2.0--TRANSMITTAL OF THE
ANALYTICAL RESULTS OF XRF ANALYSES OF SOIL SAMPLES COLLECTED
BY ROY F. WESTON PERSONNEL AT THE MILL CREEK, MONTANA SITE.
(ALONG WITH SAMPLING LOCATIONS MAPS>
CHAPPELLJ,. RICK
NOT INDIL;ATED
ERICSON JIM
NOT INDicATED
MEMO
AUTHOR:
aRGAN I ZAT I ON:
ADDRESSEE:
IIRGANIZATION:
DJm1,JMENT TYPE:
~-----------------------------------------------------------------------~~-
FWE: 2021608
1TIITt.E/SUBJECTI
~UTHOR:
aRGANI ZATION:
ADDRESSEEs
. - 3AN I Z ~ T I ON s
JMENT TY PE :
NUMBER: 100029 DATEs 00/00/00 P~GES: 1
"COMPIL~TION OF DATA COLLECTED BY EP~ IN THE VICINITY OF
MILL CREEK MONTANA"--SECTION 3.0--(SECTION DIVIDER>
E & E SAMPLES: INDOOR PERSONAL AIR, INDOOR ST~TION~RY ~IR,
V~CUUMED FLOOR DUST, AND Y~RD SOIL.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
.-----------------------------------------------------------------~-----~~~
: 2021608 NUMBER: 100030 D~TE. 0~/1~/86 PAGESz 5
'. -.E/SUBJECT: "COMPILATION OF DAT~ COLLECTED 8Y EP~ IN THE VICINITY OF
MILL CREEK,- MONT~NA"--SECTION 380--TRANSMITT~L OF A COpy OF
THE AIR S~~PLING DAT~ PACK~GE FOR THE ANACONDA PROJECT,. AND
THE TABULATED D~TA FOR AIR, SOILl ~ND VACUUM S~MPLES WHICH
CONT~IN SAMPLE NUMBERS ~ND TRAFF C REPORT NUMBERS.
~UTHOR. FR~NZEN DAVE
I~NIZATION. ECOLOGY'& ENVIRONMENT, INC. (E&E> .
, ADDRESSEE: E RICKSON JIM
I~NIZ~TION: CAMP DRESSER & McKEE, INC. (CDM)
.~~~!_!~~~~_:~!!~~---------------------------------------------------------
~s 2021608 . NUMBERs 100031 DATEs 08/23/85E P~GES: 103
11'II1t.E/SUBJECT. "COMPILATION OF DAT~ COLLECTED BY EPA IN THE VICINITY OF
MILL CREEK, MONT~N~"--SECTION 3.0--REPORT OF SAMPLING
ACTIVITIES FOR RESIDENTI~L SOIL AND DUST S~MPLING IN
~NACOND~~ MONT~NA ~ND SURROUNDING COMMUNITIES.
NOT INDI\.,;~TED
ECOLOGY & ENVIRONMENT, INC.
SCHWABb KEITH
NOT IN IC~TED
REPORT/STUDY
AUTHOR:
!IIRGANIZ~TION.
, ADDRESSEE.
", mRGANI Z~TION:
!~IJlDiUJMENT TYPE:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
~l 20~1608 NUMBER. 100032 DATE. 09/04/8~ PAGES. 8
"~II~/SUBJECT. "COMPILATION OF DAT~ COLLECTED BY EPA IN THE VICINITY OF
~ILL CREEK~ MONT~N~"--SECTION 3.0--SUMM~RY OF SOIL SAMPLING
~ND RESULT~ OF S~MPLES TAKEN FROM FIVE HOMES IN THE MILL
CREEK AREA SOUTHEAST OF AN~COND~.
~UTHOR. FR~NZEN D~VE
~~NIZATIONI ECOLOGY' & ENVIRONMENT, INC.
11 ADDRESSEE. BISHOP MIKE
I~RNIZATION. USEP~-~IIIb MONT~N~ OFFICE
, ME NT TYPEs REPORT/STU Y
~~--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/81 ADMINIStRATIVE RECORD INDEXPa
z======================.==.==~====.======.===.===..===.=.=============~I~
FILE I 20Z1608 NUMBER. 100033 DATE I 08/2~/8S PAl. 1=
TITLE/SUBJECT I "COMPILATION OF DATA COLLECTED BY EPA IN THE VICINITY. ... :!
MILL CREEK, MONTANA"--SECTION 3.0--TECHNICAL MEMQRANDUM' I~
. ANALYTICAL RESULTS, RESIDENCE DESCRIPTION AND A DISCUSSI
OF SAMPLING EVENTS. OF SOIL SAMPLES TAKEN IN JULY AND AUGV
198~t AND ANALYZED FOR ARSENIC AT AMC'S LABORATORY IN ~ui
SCHM!DTt CAROLE
NOT IND!CATED
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
MEMO
AUTHOR I
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPEI
-----------------------------------------------------------------------~~
FILE. 2021608
TITl.E/SUBJECTI
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
,"
NUMBER. 10003'+ DATE. 03/10/86 PAGES'
"COMPILATION OF DATA COLLECTED BY EPA IN THE VICINITY OF 'i'
rwt I LL CREEK, MONTANA" --SECT I ON 3. 0--ANAL YT I CAL RESUL TS FOR ~I:
RESIDENTIAL DUST AND SOIL SArwtPLING IN ANACONDA, MONTANA'
AND SURROUNDING COMMUNITIES.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
SCHWABb KEITH
NOT IN ICATED
REPORT/STUDY
FILE. 2021608
TITLE/SUBJECT.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1"
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 10003~ DATE. 00/00/00 PAGES;"
"COMPILATION OF DATA COLLECTED BY EPA IN THE VICINITY OF I,
MILL CREEKb rwtONTANA"--SECTION 4.0--
-------
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREE~ MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/87 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX Page: lS
J=a=======================-======~~===-=--=------=====-------------------c----
ILE: 20Z1608 NUMBER. 100039 - -- -OATE7 00/00/00---------PAGES~ 2---
ITLE/SUBJECT. "COMPILATION OF DATA COLLECTED BY EPA IN THE VICINITY OF
MILL CREEK, MONTANA"--SECTION 4.0--TA8LE 1. URINARY ARSENIC
LEVELS (UG/l) OF MILL CREEK CHILDREN, BY DATE OF COLLECTION,
AND TABLE 2. URINARY ARSENIC LEVELS
NOT LNDICATED
MEMO
-----..-----------------------------------------------------'-'-----------CO~""'CZI eo::. =
flEa 2021608 NUMBER. 100041 D~TE. 00/00/00 PAGES x 2~
TLE/SUB.JECT. "COMPILATION OF DATA COLLECTED BY EPA IN THE VICINITY OF
~1~boER~T~'G~2~I~~A~AM~C~~I~~O~P~TE~!~~~E~~T~gNb~~~;
AUTHOR. NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION. NOT INDICATED
ADDRESSEE. NOT INDICATED
. ORGANIZATIONI NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE. REPORT/STUDY
;Ir~;~-~~~~~~~~-------~~:;~;~-~~~~:~---------~~;~~-~~~~~~~~---------~~~~;~-~---
~TLE/SU8JECT' "COMPILATION OF EPA DATA AND RELATED GAIGC FOR MfLL CREEK,
MONTANA--VOLUME 2 - GA/GC DATA"--COVER SHEET AND TABLE OF
. CONTENTS.
AUTHOR: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION: CAMP DRESSER & Mc~EE, INC. (CDM)
ADDRESSEE. NOT INDICATED
. ORGANIZATION. NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE. REPORT/STUDY
~----------------------------------------------------------------------------~~
I
,FILE. 2021608
I TITLE/SUB.JECT.
AUTHOR.
ORGAN I ZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
I ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TY PE .
NUMBER. 100043 D~TE. 09/04/8~E PAGES: 87
~COMPILATION OF EPA DATA AND RELATED GA.AC FOR MILL CREEK,
MONTANA--VOLUME 2 - GA/QC DATA"--SECTION 1.0--INDOOR AIR
Q~ REVIEW .
AUTHOR. NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION. NOT INDICATED
ADDRESSEE. NOT INDICATED
'DORGAN I ZAT I ON. NOT I ND I CATED
OCUMENT TYPE. REPORT/STUDY
----------------------------------------------------------------------------~~
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONT~N~ OPER~BLE UNIT
10/01/87 ~DMINIStR~TIVE RECORD INDEX PI
......=:_=...=.==.....==...............................................J
FILE. 2021608 NUMBER. 10004:1 D~TE, 07/23/8:1E PAGES
TITLE/SUBJECT, "COMPIL~TION OF EP~ D~T~ ~ND REL~TED GAIGC FOR M.ILL CREE~'I.
MONTANA--VOLUME 2 - GAIGC OATA"--SECTION 3.0--VARD SOIL'
. REVIEW (E&E), GC REPORT NUMBERS :l9~1, :19:10, AND :5949.' I
AUTHOR' NOT INDICATED .
ORGANIZATION, NOT INDICATED'
ADDRESSEE, NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION, NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE, REPORT/STUDY I
------------------------------------------------------------------------.
FILE' 2021608
TITLE/SUBJECT,
AUTHOR,
ORG~NIZATION.
~DDRESSEE.
ORG~NIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER, 100046 D~TE, 00/00/00 PAGESJ
"COMPILATION OF EPA DATA AND RELATED GAIGC FOR MILL CREEK,
MONTANA--VOLUME 2 - G~/GC DATA"--SECTION 4.0--(SECTION '
DIVIDER) CDC URIN~RY ARSENIC D~T~.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDIC~TED
REPORTISTUDY
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 2021608
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR,
ORG~NIZ~TION.
~DDRESSEE.
ORG~NIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER, 100047 DATE. 06/02/86E PAGES.I
"COMPILATION OF EPA DATA AND RELATED GA/GC FOE MILL CREEK'
MONTANA--VOLU"'E 2 - GAIGC DATA"-SECTION 4.0--DESCRIPTION'
OF THE HANDLING OF THE URINE SPECIMENS COLLECTED AS PART 0
THE CDC SURVEYS HELD I N ""ARCH AND JULY OF 1 98~, ~ND ~A COpy
OF THE ANALYSIS RESULTS.
NOT INDICATED
DEPARTMENT OF HE~LTH & HUMAN SERVICES
MCGEEHIN\ MICHAEL
USEPA-VIII
""EMO
-------------------------------------------------------------~---------
FILE. 2021608
TITLE/SUBJECT,
AUTHOR s
ORG~NIZATIONs
ADDRESSEEs
ORG~NIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPEs
NUMBER s 100048 DATE. 00/00/00 PAGES I
"COMP.ILATION OF EPA DATA AND RELATED GAIGC FOR MILL CREE'
MONTANA--VOLU"'E 2 - GAIGC DATA"--SECTION S.0--(SECTION
DIVIDER) SURFACE AND PROFILE SOIL SA"'PLES (WESTON) .
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDIC~TED
REPORT/STUDY
----------------------------~-------------------------------------------
FILEs 2021608
TITLE/SU8.JECTs
AUTHORs
ORGANIZATIONs
ADDRESSEEs
ORGANIZ~TION.
DOCUMENT TYPE I
NU"'BERs 100049 - DATE I 6/26/86E P~GESI
"COMPIL~TION OF EPA DATA AND REL~TED GA/GC FOR MILL CREEK,
MONTANA--VOLU"'E 2 - GA/GC DATAN--SECTION S.0--SURFACE AND
PROFILE SOIL S~MPLES (WESTON) s GC REPORT NUMBERS 229:51-1-1,
AND 229:1H-2.
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDICATED
REPORTISTUDY
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEs 2021608
TITLE/SU8.JECTI
AUTHORs
ORGANIZ~TION.
ADDRESSEEs
ORG~NI ZAT IONs
DOCUMENT TYPEs
NUMBERs 1000~0 ~TEs 06/27/86E P~GESI
.CO"'PILATION OF EPA DATA AND REL~TED GAIGC FOR MILL CREEK,
MONTANA--VOLU"'E 3 - GAIGC DATAN--SECTION :I.0--SURF~CE AND
PROFILE SOIL SAMPLES (WESTON)s GC REPORT NUMBER 229:51-1-3.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT .INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------.
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
. MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERA8LE UNIT
~;~~~~~~~==========~=======~~~;~!;!:~~!~;=~;;~:~=;~~;~=================~:~;~=~~
FILEt 20216~8 NUMBERt 100051 . DATEt 00/~0/00 PAGES: 1
TITLE/SUBJECT: "COMPILATION OF EPA DATA AND RELATED QA/QC FOR MILL CREEK
MONTANA--VOLUME 2 - QA/f)C DATA"--SECTION 6.0--(SECTION '
DIVIDER> HI-VOL AIR DATA (STATE OF MONTANA>
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT; '.JDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
AUTHOR.
ORG~NIZATIONt
~DDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPEt
---------------------------------------------------------------------------~~-
FILE. 2021608
TITLE/SUBJECT.
~UTHOR.
ORG~NIZ~TION.
. ~DDRESSEE :
C'- :.~NIZ~TION:
Df - ~NT TYPE I
NUMBER. 1000~2 D~TEt 08/11/82E P~GESr 16
"COMPILATION OF EPA D~TA AND RELATED G~/QC FOR MILL CREEK,
MONTAN~--VOLUME 2 - GA/GC DATA"--SECTION 6.0--AMBIENT AIR
MONITORING PLAN FOR DEER LODGE VALLEY WHICH WAS DESIGNED TO
GENERATE ADDITIONAL DATA TO DEFINE THE CURRENT AIR nUALITY
STATUS FOR TOTAL SUSPENDED PARTICLES AND INH~LIBLE P~RTICLES
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDIC~TED
NC - rNDIC~TED
NC, iNDIC~TED
REPORT/STUDY
._----------------------------------------------------------------~~-~~~~
2021608 NUMBER. 1000~3 D~TEI 0~/22/a6 PAGES 8 1
!SUBJECT. ;g2~~~~~!~g~u~~ ~P~ g~}~CA~gT~~~~~~gT~~'G~.~~~R~~~~D?:~E~~E
PRECISION/ACCURACY/QA FOR ANACOND~ AREA STATE SITESL 1981
TO PRESENT--THE DAT~ FROM THESE SITES HAVE MET ALL uF THE
STATE-EPA GA REGUIRE~ENTS FOR ~CCURACY.
ORG~NI~~+~g~: ~~+SY~bI~8~ED
ADDRESSEE. RUBICH MIKE
~~~~~~!:!!~~l_~~!!~~~~~::~~-------------------------------------------------~
FILE. 2021608
TITLE/SUBJECT.
~UTHOR.
ORG~NIZATION:
ADDRESSEE I
ORGANI ZATION.
DOCUMENT TY PE I
NUMBER I 1000~4 DATEt 0~/21/96 PAGES. 3
"COMPILATION OF EPA DATA AND RELATED QA/QC FOR MILL CREEK
MONTAN~--VOLUME 2 - GA/GC DATA"--SECTION 6.0--REGARDING T~E
PRECISION/ACCURACY/GA FOR ANACONDA AREA STATE SITES 1~91 TO
PRESENT--THERE IS NO PRECISION DATA AVAILABLE SPECIFICALLY
FOR THE AREAi PRECISION FOR THE STATE IS LISTED.
SCHNEIDER Jt:RRY
STATE DEPARTMENT 'OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
RAISCH BOB
NOT INbICATED
MEMO
----------------------------------------------------------------------------~-
FILE. 202160g
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
ORG~NIZATION.
~DDRESSEE.
DORGAN I ZATION.
OCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 100001 DATE. 12/00/9~ PAGES. 25
~SSEMBLAGE OF AVAILABLE DATA ON METALS CONCENTRATIONS IN
SOILS IN THE VICINITY OF MILL CREEK, MONTANA.
NOT INDICATED
TETRA TECHL INC.
NOT INDICA/ED
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC)
REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 202160g NUMBER. 100002 DATE. 03/00/96 PAGES I 24
TITLE/SUBJECT. SAMPLIN~ AND ANALYSIS OF DOMESTIC WATER WELLS IN THE
VICINITY OF THE ANACONDA SMELTER SITE TO VERIFY THAT
DOMESTIC WELLS HAVE NOT BEEN ADVERSELY AFFECTED 8Y OVERLYING
SOIL CONTAMINANTS. (INTERNAL DOCUMENT NUM8ER TT8 151 FO>
AUTHOR. NOT INDICATED
ORG~NIZATION. TETRA TECHL INC.
ADDRESSEE I NOT INDICA/ED
ORGANIZATION. NOT INDICATED
~:~~~~!_!!~~:_~~~~~!:~!~~!_--------------------------------------------------
-------
AN~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREE~ MONTAN~ OPERABLE UNIT
1121/1211/87 ADMINIStR~TIVE RECORD INDEX ~i\t
.....~===s=====..=....~=..=====..=.==.====-_. ====== ============ ========':;.dl
FILEI 21212161219 NUMBER I 10001213 D~TEI 1217/2~/00 PAGE'~jl
TITLE/SUBJECT I CH~IN OF CUSTODY RECORDS--PROJECT N~ME: MILL CREEK; ~
. PROJECT NUMBER: 228 III
~UTHORI NOT INDICATED
ORG~NIZATION: CAMP DRESSER & McKEE, INC.
-------
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/87 ADMINIS~RATIVE RECORD INDEX Page: c~
..===..=============.=========8============================---===== = ===:. ==.: = ~ --
FILE. a02160~ NUMBER. 100008 DATE. OS/20/86--- PAGES: la--
TITLE/SUBJECT. ~IELD NOTEBOOK DETAILING THE MILL CREEK TAPWATER SAMPLING.
AUTHl ~I ~UPP GRETCHEN
ORGANIZATIONI NOT iNDICATED
ADDRESSEE I NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION. NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE. HANDWRITTEN NOTES
--------------------
FILE. a02160~
TITLE/SUBJECT I
AUTHOR I
ORGANIZATIONI
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION,
DOCUMENT TYPE,
--------------------------------------------------------
. WMBER. 10000~ DATE I 06/03/86
DATA PACKAGE FOR SERVICE REQUEST NUMeER 13876.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
PAGESI 117
------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~=~
FILE, 202160~
TI TLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHor
'4 IZ A T I 0,.. .
)DRESSEE.
H ZATIONI
:NT TYPE.
NUMBER, 100010 D~TEI 06/23/86
TRI="'-"'ITT~L OF RESULTS FOR THE AN~LYSIS OF THREE
SA. S WH I CH WERE RECE I VED ON M~Y 23, . 1 '386.
BOl .GER MARK J.
ROC~f MOU~TAIN AN~LYTICAL LABORATORY (RMAL)
LYTLE CHUCK
TETRA' TECH, INC.
LETTER
PAGES I 2
WATER
-------------------------------------------------------------------~~~~~~-
FIL.~ : ~2.1'".0~ NUMBER, 100011 DATEI 0~/I:i/86E PAGES I 1
TITLL )8 ~T, "APPENDIX D - WEYERHAEUSER/TETRATECH RESPONSES TO REM II/RPM
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION"--APPENDIX COVER.
r.\.n 110R, NOT I ND I CATED
ORGANIZATION, NOT INDICATED
ADDRESSEE. NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION. NOT INDICATED
I DOCUMENT TYPE. REPORT/STUDY
------------------------~---------------------------------------------------~~
FILE. 202160~
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR I
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESS£EI
ORGAN I ZAT I ON.
DOCUMENT TYPE I
NUMBER. 100012 D~TEI 10/06/86 PAGES, 2
TRANSMITTAL OF ALL AVAILAeLE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION AS
REQUESTED ON THE SEPTEMBER I~TH AND SEPTEMBER 24TH MEMORANDA
FROM CDM FOR MILL CREEK DATA VALIDATION.
LYTLE, CH~RLES R. -
TETRA TECH,. INC.
BISHOP MI~E
USEPA-~III, MONTANA OFFICE
LETTER
---------------------------------------------------------------------------~~-
FILE, 202160~
TI TLE/SUBJECT .
AUTHOR,
ORGANIZATION,
ADDRESSEE,
ORGANIZATIONs
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER, 100013 D~TE. 00/00/00 PAGES. 41
PART 2--~ PACKAGE CONTAINING ALL THE AVAILABLE ADDITIONAL
DOCUMENTATION AS REnUESTED ON THE SEPTEMBER l:iTH AND
SEPTEMBER 24TH MEMORAND~ FROM COM.
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDIC~TED
REPORT/STUDY
.,
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE, 202160~ NUMBER, 10001~ D~TE. 10/09/86 PAGES, 1
TITLE/SUBJECT. REGARDING QUESTIONS WHICH HAVE ARISEN CONCERNING FIELD'
PROCEDURES USED BY TETRA TECH AND ITS SUBCONTRACTORS IN THE
MILL CREEK MONTANA REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION. ALL FIELD
PROCEDURE METHODS WERE THOSE SPECIFIED AS STANDARD OPERATING
PROCEDURES AND FIELD OPERATING PROCEDURES FOR ANACONDA.
ORGANI~~+~g~: ~~~~A ~~E~~H1~c.
ADDRESSEE. CHEATHAM HICHARD
ORGANIZATION. CAMP DRESSER & McKEE, INC. (COM)
~~:~~~~!_!!~~!_::~~:~---------------------------------------------------------
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT ~
10/01/87 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX PClge: 2''<1
---z=-=-========================.==~==.===-======a=======================:--- ~~.. ,
FIi:E.-202161~9 NUMBER. 100016 DATE. 10/14/86 PAGES I i-- i
TITLE/SUBJECT. EXPLA1NING THAT ALL LABORATORY ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
DETAILED IN THE LABORATORY ANALYTICAL PROTOCOL DEVELOPED FOR'
THE ANACONDA SMELTER RIfFS ~ERE STRICTLY FOLLO~ED, AND
PERSONNEL PERFORMING THE LABORATORY ~ORK ~ERE ALL ~UALIFIED
ACCORDING TO THE EPA'S CLP REGUIREMENTS.
FROST THOMAS R.
~EYERHAEUSER ANALYTICAL AND TESTING SERVICES
CHEATHAM RICHARD
CAMP DRE~SER & McKEE, INC. (CDM)
LETTER
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------_.
FILE. 2021609
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR:
ORG~N IZAT I ON.
ADDRESSEE.
ORG~NIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 100017 DATE. 10/10/86 PAGES. 1
EXPLAINING THAT ALL LABORATORY ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES ~ERE
FOLLOWED AND THAT THE PERSONNEL PERFORMING THE ACTUAL
LABORATORY ~ORK ARE ALL QUALIFIED ACCORDING TO THE EPA'S
CLP RE~UIREMENTS.
S~~~~~~ED~~~ ANALYTICAL AND TESTING SERVICES
CHEAPHAM RICHARD
CAMP DRE~SER & McKEE, INC. (CDM)
LETTER
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 2021609 NUMBER. 100018 DATE. 00/00/00 PAGES. 1
TITLE/SUBJECT. ~~~i~~g~~LGINF6~~~~1~~HTOI~EDR~~iP~~~EA~g S~~pI5E~!g~~~tI~~~
--APPENDIX COVER.
~UTHOR. NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
ADDRESSEE. NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION. NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE. REPORT/STUDY
;;~~~-~~~~~~~--------:~:;~~~-~~~~~~---------~~~~~-~~~~:~~~---------~~;~;~-:---~
TITLE/SUBJECT. TRANSMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION FOR MILL CREEK RIfFS
DATA ~HICH WAS REGUESTED IN AN OCTOBER 20~ 1986 ~EMORANDU~
FROM CDM ~HICH LISTS 11 ITEMS FROM THE QA~P AND 12 ITE~S
FROM THE LAP THAT REGUIRE "SPECIFIC, DETAILED
DOCUMENTATION."
LYTLE, CHARLES R.
TETRA TECH,. INC.
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-~III, MONTANA OFFICE
LETTER
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 2021609
TITLE/SUBJECT.
~UTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORG~NIZATIONI
DOCUMENT TYPE,
NUMBER. 100020 DATE. 00/00/00
"APPENDIX H - ADDITIONAL DOCUMENT~TION PROVIDED BY
~EYERHAEUSER TO REM II PERSONNEL IN RESPONSE TO REM II
PERSONNEL TELEPHONE REQUESTS"--APPENDIX COVER.
NOT INDICATED .
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
PAGES. 1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 2021609
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 100021 DATE. 11/12/86
FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION OF ADDITION~L DOCUMENTATION
RE~UESTED BY REM II PERSONNEL.
S~~~~~~ED~~~ ANALYTICAL AND TESTING SERVICES
BERNIG WILLIAM
CAMP DRESSER & McKEE, INC. (CD"')
MISCELLANEOUS
PAGES. 6
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~N~CONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONT~NA OPER~BLE UNIT
i~10/01/87 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX Page: .=.:
j-=========================---=-z====-==--------====-------=--------------------
I LE. 2021609 NUMBE~;-li0022 -----~~iE: li;i~;ii --------~~~~~;-~-_.
TLE/SUBJECT. F~CS I MILE T R~NSM I SS I ON OF ADD I T I ONAL. DOCUMENTAT I ON
\ REQUESTED BY REM II PERSONNEL.
~UTHOR: DOXSEE KARl
i( ORGANIZATION: WEYERHAEUSER ANALYTICAL AND TESTING SERVICES
ADDRESSEE: BERNIG WILLIAM
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: MISCELLANEOUS
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE I 20Z 1609
...TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHORI
ORG~N I ZAT I ON:
~DDRESSEEI
ORG~N I Z~T I ON I
DOCUMENT TY PE I
NUMBER I 100023 D~TEI 10/31/86
FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION OF ~DDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION
REQUESTED BY REM II PERSONNEL.
DOXSEE KARl
WEYERHAEUSER ~NALYTICAL AND TESTING SERVICES
EtERNIGb WILLIAM
NOT IN ICATED
MISCELLANEOUS
PAGES. '3
---------------------------------------------------------------------------~--
FILE. 2021609
TITLE/SUBJECT I
AUTHOR.
, ORGANIZATION.
: ~DDRESSEE.I
, ORG~NIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 100024 D~TE. 10/06/86 PAGES. 2
TRANSMITTAL OF ALL AV~IL~BLE ~DDITION~L DOCUMENTATION AS
RE~UESTED ON THE SEPTEMBER 15TH ~ND SEPTEMBER 24TH
MEMORANDA FROM CDM FOR MILL CREEK DATA VALIDATION.
LYTLE, CHARLES R.
TETRA TECH,. INC.
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
LETTER
----------------------------------------------------------------------------~-
FILE. 2021609 NUMBER. 10002~ DATE. 00/00/00 PAGES. 3
TITLE/SUBJECT. "PART 2--ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION 'COMMON TO ALL OF THE DATA
PACKAGES.'"
AUTHOR: NOT INDICATED
"IRG~NIZATION. NOT INDICATED
I ADDRESSEE. NOT INDICATED
I/II~ RG~NI Z~T ION. NOT IND ICATED
:OOCUMENT TYPE. REPORT/STUDY
~--------~-------------------------------------------------------------------~~
FILE. 2021609 NUMBER. 100026 DATE. 00/00/00 P~GES: 6
TITLE/SUBJECT: "~DDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION FOR WEY LOT. 1387& (TAP WATER)"
~UTHOR: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
ADDRESSEE. NOT INDICATED
DORGAN I ZAT I ON I NOT I ND I CATED
OCUMENT TYPE. REPORT/STUDY
""'--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---
I:FILE. 2021&09
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
ORG~NIZ~TION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORG~NI ZATIONa
DOCUMENT TY PE I
NUMBER. 100027
"ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION
TEST SOILS)"
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
DATE. 00/00/00 PAGES: 8
FOR WEY LOT . 1396~ (PRE-LEACH
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
,-'
FILE. 2021609 NUMBER. 100028 DATE I 00/00/00 PAGES: 5
ITITLE/SUBJECT. "ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION FOR WEY LOT . 1397~ (POST-LEACH
TEST SOIL"S AND LEACHATE>"
ORG~NI~~+~g~: ~g~s~~DI~~~~D
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
DO ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
CUMENT TYPE. REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/87 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX Page: 2"1
---=-=---------===-----==========~-====================~==================---~,.~
FILE:- 202160g-- ---NUMBER. 10002~ DATE: 00/00/00 PAGES: 5--=='
TITLi/sUBJECTI ~ADDITlONAL DOCUMENTATION FOR WEY LOT. 14054 (DEEP-TIll
BEFORE) " "
AUTHOR I DOXSEE KARl
ORGANIZATIONI NOT INDICATED
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPEI REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEI 202161Z1~
TITLE/SUBJECT I
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE.
ORGAN I ZAT I ON.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 100030
~ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION
PROFILES)"
DOXSEE KARl
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
DATE. 0121/121121/00 PAGES: 4
FOR WEY LOT. 1411212 (YARD SOIL
------------------------------------------------~-----------------------------
FILE. 202161Z1~
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 100031
~ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
DATE. 00/00/00 PAGES I 2
FOR MC-1W (WEY LOT . 12611)~
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 202161Z1~
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER, 100032
"ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION
AFTER)"
DOXSEE KARl
NOT INbICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
DATE. 00/00/00 PAGES I 6
FOR WEY LOT . 1419~ (DEEP-TILL
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 202161Z1~
TITLE/SUB.1EC1=.
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZ~TION:
ADDRESSEE I
ORGANIZ~TION.
DOCUMENT TYPE I
NUMBER. 100033 DATE. 0~/23/86 PAGES I 1
DISCUSSION OF SAMPLING EVENTS FOR SOIL SAMPLES COLLECTED
BY TAT FROM THE MILL CREEK COMMUNITY, DEER LODGE COUNTY,
MONTANA ON THREE SEPARATE OCCASIONS.
WHITTENHAGEN DIANE K.
TECHNIC~L ASSISTANCE TEAM (TAT) REGION VIII
NICHOLSi FLOYD D.
USEPA-V II
LETTER
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 2021e.0~
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZ~TION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 100034
"ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION
SOILS)"
DOXSEE KARl
NOT INbICATED
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
DATE. 0121/00/00 PAGES I 4
FOR WEY LOT. 14205 (SURFACE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 202161Z1~
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE I
ORGANIZ~TION.
DOCUMENT TYPEs
NUMBER. 10003~ DATE. 10/0~/a6 PAGES I 1
REGARDING QUESTIONS WHICH HAVE ARISEN CONCERNING FIELD
PROCEDURES USED BY TETRA TECH AND ITS SUBCONTRACTORS IN THE
MILL CREEK MONTANA REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION. ALL FIELD
PROCEDURE METHODS WERE THOSE SPECIFIED AS STANDARD OPERATING
PROCEDURES PoND FIELD OPERATING PROCEDURES FOR ANACONDA.
RUPP1. GRETCHEN
TETR~ TECH INC.
CHEATHAM RICHARD
CAMP DRESSER & McKEE, INC. (COM)
LETTER
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
~ILL CREEK MONT~N~ OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/87 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX P~QE: ~-
18======================-==============================================--------
FILE. 202160~ NUMBER I 100036 DATE I 10/14/66 PAGE~:-~---
TITLE/SUBJECT I EXPLAINING THAT ALL LABORATORY ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES -..
DETAILED IN THE LABORATORY ANALYTICAL PROTOCOL DEVELOPED
FOR THE ANACONDA SMELTER RI/FS WERE STRICTLY FOLLOWED, AN:
PERSONNEL WHO PERFORMED THE LABORATORY WORK WERE ALL
QUALIFIED ACCORDING TO THE EP~'S CLP REQUIREMENTS.
FROST THOMAS R.
WEYERHAEUSER ANALYTICAL AND TESTING SERVICES
CHEATHAM RICHARD
C~MP DRESSER & McKEE, INC.
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONT~N~ OPER~BLE UNIT
10/01/87 ~DMINIS'rR~TIVE RECORD INDEX P.ge: 2'
. ~= =:1:8=2==== ===== = ====-= ==_====2 .8.:II:II~==== ===-==== ..=-.:1 ===- -=== == = = ===- ======:: '.l:::\1
FILE. a02160~ NU,.,BER I 100042 D~TE. 10/10/86 PAGES: !
TITLE/SUBJECT. TR~NSMITTAL COVER SHEET
~UTHOR. DOXSEE K~RI
ORG~NIZ~TIONI NOT INbIC~TED
~DDRESSEEI CHE~PHAM~ RICHARD
ORGANIZATION. NOT INDI~ATED
DOCUMENT TYPEs MISCELLANEOUS
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 202160~
TITLE/SUBJECTs
~UTHOR.
ORG~NIZ~TioNs
~DDRESSEEs
ORG~NIZ~TIONs
DOCU,.,ENT TYPE.
NU,.,BERs 100043 D~TE. 10/10/86 P~GES: 1
EXPL~INING THAT ALL LABORATORY ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES ~ERE
FOLLOWED AND TH~T THE PERSONNEL PERFORMING THE ACTU~L
LAaOR~TORY WORK ARE ~LL QU~LIFIED ACCORDING TO THE EP~'S
CLP REQUIREMENTS. .
S~~i~~~EO~~~ ANALYTICAL AND TESTING SERVICES
CHEAPHA,., RICHARD
CAMP DRESSER & "'eKEE, INC.
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONT~N~ OPER~BLE UNIT
n~1/87 ~DMINIS~R~TIVE RECORD INDEX P~ge' ~-
=a===~=~=================================================================~==
FILE. ~0~160~ NUMBER. 100048 D~TE. 10/24/85 P~GES' 2
tItLE/SUBJECT. TRANSMITTAL OF THE RESULTS OF ARSENIC ANALYSES OF MILL CRE~~
. UNFILTERED DRINKING WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED BY THE FIT TEAM'
~UTHOR: BIGHAM GARY N.'
QRGANIZATION. TETRA TECH" INC.
ADDRESSEE. 8ISHOP MIKE
QRGANIZ~TION. USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
~MENT TYPE. LETTER
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE . 202160~
nm..E/SUBJECT.
~UTHOR:
IIIIS,:\N I Z A T ION.
ADDRESSEE.
IIIIE~N I Z~T I ON.
DlDlCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 10004~ D~TE. 00/00/00 PAGES: 1
FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION OF 26 PAGES OF DRINKING WATER
~N~LYSES PROVIDED 8Y ANACOND~. THE DATA NEEDS TO 8E
V~LID~TED ACCORDING TO THE QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN
AND THE L~B AN~LYTICAL PROTOCOL. -
BISHOP MIKE
USEP~-VIII~ MONTAN~ OFFICE
ERICSON JlM
CAMP DRESSER & McKEE, INC. CCDM)
MISCELL~NEOUS
------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~~~
Ft1L.£ I 2021 609
Tt1tL.E/SU8J'ECT I
~UTHOR.
ClRGANIZ~TION.
~DDRESSEE.
C~NIZ~TIONI
C,-"CUMENT TY PE I
NUMBER. 100050
COPIES OF P~GES FROM G.L.
THROUGH OCTOBER 1~86.
RUPP~ GRETCHEN
NOT lNDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDIC~TED
HANDWRITTEN NOTES
D~TE. 00/00/00 PAGES: 30
RUPP'S NOTEBOOK FROM AUGUST 1985
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~
FlU. 2021609
T.!TU:/SUBJECT.
~UTHORI
~~NIZ~TION.
, ADDRESSEE.
~NIZATION:
DC1CJMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 1000~1
TRANSMITTAL OF A LIST
TETR~ TECH WOULD LIKE
CENTER.
SCHMIDT1. CAROLE
TETR~ Tt:.CH1. INC.
ERICSON JIM
CAMP DRESSER & McKEE,
LETTER
D~TE. 07/22/86 PAGES: 1
OF SOIL SAMPLES CNOT ATTACHED> THAT
CDM TO SEND TO WEYERHAEUSER TECHNOLOGY
INC. CCDM)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------~=
nt.E. 2021609
'lTtTiLE/SUB.1ECT.
~UTHOR.
aDlGANIZ~TIONI
ADDRESSEE.
OJIGANI Z~T ION.
I1IIIICJMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 1000~2 D~TEI 08/22/86
TR~NSMITTAL OF THE RESULTS OF THE AN~COND~ SOIL
PERFORMED UNDER SERVICE REQUEST NUMBER 14a0~.
DOXSEE K~RI
WEYERHAEUSER AN~LYTIC~L AND TESTING SERVICES
LYTLE, CHUCK
TETR~ TECH, INC.
LETTER
PAGES. 1
SAMPLES
--------~-------------------------------------------------------------------~
w. 2021609
E/SU8J'ECTI
~UTHOR.
IIIIIIISAN I ZAT I ON.
ADDRESSEE.
~~NIZ~TION'
MENT TYPE.
NUMBER I 1000~3
RESULTS OF THE AN~COND~ SOIL
NUMBER 1420~ CICP ~ND ATOMIC
CHAIN OF CUSTODY INCLUDED.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
D~TE. 07/2~/00 PAGES. 161
SAMPLES FOR SERVICE REQUEST
ABSORPTION D~TA).
~--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK'r MONT~N~ OPER~BLE UNIT
1121/1211/87 ADMINIS R~TIVE RECORD INDEX P
-------
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
110/0!.~~~__----------- ADMINI~TRATIVE RECORD INDEX Pag=: ::.::
FiLE~-2021609--------~UMBER~=i000£0=========DATE~=i~i~~i85=========PAGES~=~=~=
TITLE/SUBJECT: "I NTERLABORATORY COMPAR I SON QC DATA (OCTOBER 1 '385 MILL
CREEK SOILS SAMPLING) "--ANALYSIS DATA FOR SERVICE REQUEST
NUMBER 12'332.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
AUTHOR:
ORGANI ZAT I ON:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGAN I ZAT ION:
DOCUMENT TY PE :
------------------------------------------------------------------------~-----
FILE: 20::: 1609
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGAN I ZAT I ON:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER:
"SECTION .e.-C
COVER SHEET.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MISCELLANEOUS
100061 DATE: 00/00/00 PAGES: :
- RESULTS TRANSMITTAL LETTER (MC-1W) "--YELLOi..
-------------------------------------------------------------------~-~---~~~=-
FILE I 2021609
TI TLE/SUBJECT :
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TY PE I
NUMBER: 100062 DATE I 10/24/6~
TRANSMITTAL OF THE RESULTS OF ARSENIC ANALYSES OF
CREEK UNFILTERED DRINKING WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED
FIT TEAM.
~i~~~MTE~~~YI~C.
BISHOP, MIKE
USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
LETTER
PAGES. 2
MILL
BY THE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------~-~~=
~ILE I 2021609
ITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR I
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGAN I ZAT I ON:
DOCUMENT TY PE :
NUMBER: 100063 DATE I 00/00/00 PAGES I 8
ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR SERVICE REQUEST NUMBER 1397~.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
---------------------------------~--------------------------------------~---~~
FILE. 20Z1609
TI TLE/SUBJECT :
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATIONI
DOCUMENT TY PE I
NU~BERI 100064 DATE I 00/00/00
FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION OF ANALYTICAL DATA ON
11/03/86~ AND 11/12/86.
DOXSEE I\ARI
WEYERHAEUSER ANALYTICAL AND TESTING SERVICES
BERNIGb WILLIAM
NOT IN ICATED
MISCELLANEOUS
PAGES: '3
10/31/66,
----------------------------------------------------------------------------~~
FILEI 20Z160~
TI TLE/SUB.1ECT I
AUTHOR'
ORGANI ZATION I
ADDRESSEE:
DORGAN I ZAT I ON.
OCUMENT TYPE.
NU~BER, 100066 DATE I 00/00/00
MAPPENDIX H - ADDITIONAL DOCU~ENTATION PROVIDED BY
WEYERHAEUSER TO REM II PERSONNEL IN RESPONSE TO REM II
PERSONNEL TELEPHONE RECUESTS"--WHITE COVER SHEET.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MISCELLANEOUS
PAGES I 1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------~-
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
"ILL CREEK MONTAN~ OPER~BLE UNIT
10/01/87 ADMINISTR~TIVE RECORD INDEX P~ge'
FjLE~=202~609========NuMBER~=~00067=========DATE~=09;22;86=========ZAGES~=~1
TITLE/SUBJECT: TRANS~ITTAL OF THE DATA P~CK~GE FOR LEAD REANALYSIS WHICH
COMPLETES THE TRANSMITTAL OF ALL NEW DATA GENERATED FCR THE
MILL CREEK RI/FS.
AUTHOR: LYTLE, CHARLES R.
ORGANIZATION: TETRA TECH,. INC.
ADDRESSEE: BISHOP, ~IKE
ORGANIZATION: USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
DOCUMENT TYPE: LETTER
----------------------------------------------------------------------------. i
FILE: c:0Z1609
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
N'-"BER: 100068 D~TE: 0'3/03/86 PAGES: 1
TR~NS~ITTAL OF THE RESULTS OF THE AN~CONDA SOIL LE~CHING
SAMPLES PERFORMED UNDER SERVICE REQUEST NUMBER 13975.
DOXSEE KAR I
WEYERHAEUSER AN~LYTICAL AND TESTING SERVICES
LYTLE, CHUCK
TETRA TECH, INC.
LETTER
----------------------------------------------~------------------------------
FILE: 2021609
TITLE/SUBJECT:
. AUTHOR:
ORG~NIZATION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
.~BER: 100069 DATE: 08/08/86 PAGES: 6
"LEACHING TEST1. ~NACOND~"--INDIC~TES SCOPE1. APPRO~CH,
APPARATUS DIAGH~M, PREFILLING TUBES DESCRI~TION, AND
S~MPLE DATE,. TIME AND VOLUME USED.
SHELTON} ~IKE
NOT IND CATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
HANDWRITTEN NOTES
--~--------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021609
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100070 D~TE: 00/00/00 PAGES: 267
AN~LYTIC~L D~TA P~CKAGE OF MILL CREEK SOIL S~MPLES
AN~LYZED BY THE LE~CH TEST METHOD. (SERVICE REQUEST
NUMBER 1397~)
NOT INDICATED
WEYERHAEUSER AN~LYTIC~L ~ND TESTING SERVICES
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEz 2021609
TITLE/SUBJECTz
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPEz
NUMBER: 100071 DATE: 08/08/86
ANALYTICAL RESULTS OF AN~CONDA SOIL S~MPLES,
REQUEST NUMBER 14064.
NOT INDICATED
WEYERHAEUSER ~N~LYTIC~L ~ND TESTING SERVICES
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
PAGES, 3
SERVICE
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
~ILE: 20216eg
TITLE/SU8.JECT.
AUTHOR.
ORG~NIZ~TIONI
~DDRESSEE:
ORG~NI ZATIONI
DOCUMENT TYPEz
- NUMBER: 100072
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORDS
FOR THE MILL CREEK RI/FS
NOT INDICATED
TETRA TECH1. INC.
NOT INDICA rED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
DATE: 06/12/86 PAGES: 10
AND S~MPLE ANALYSIS REQUEST FORMS
PROJECT.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTAN~ OPER~BLE UNIT
10/01/87 ADMIN:StR~TIVE RECORD INDEX P~ge: :;
~=========================================------===a=----------=~===----------
(ILE: a~a160~ NUMBER: 100073 --CATE: 00/00/00----- PAGES:-S---
TITLE/SUBJECT: "DEEP TILLING EXPERIMENT - FIELD PROCEDURES" - STEP 1 .
THROUGH STEP 4 WITH A DIAGRAM.
~UTHOR: NOT INDIC~TED
ORGANIZ~TION: NOT INDICATED
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZ~TION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 202 160~
TITLE/SUBJECT I
~UTHOR:
ORGAN I Z~T ION:
~DDRESSEEI
ORG~N I ZAT I ON:
DOCUMENT TY PE :
NUMBER I 100074
COPIES OF ~ FIELD NOTEBOOK
SAMPLING T~KING PLACE FROM
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
H~NDWRITTEN NOTES
DATEI 00/00/00 PAGES: 13
DESCRIBING DEEP TILL SITE
JUNE 11, 1986 TO JUNE 1 a, 1986.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~~
FILE: 2021 e.0~
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHORI
ORGAN I Z~T I ON I
ADDRESSEE:
ORGAN I Z~T ION:
DOCUMENT TY PE I
NUMBER: 10007~
"T~BLE 5 - FIELD D~T~
ANACOND~ RI/FS"--SOIL
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MISCELLANEOUS
DATE: 00/00/00 PAGES: 9
SHEET PHASE II SOILS INVESTIGATION
PROFILE DAT~~
-------------------------------------------------------~--------------------~-
FILE: 202160~
TITLE/SU8.JECT I
~UTHOR:
~ORGANIZ~TIONI
, ~DDRESSEE I
ORG~N I Z~T I ON:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER I 100076 DATE: 08/11/86
TR~NSMITT~L OF REPORT FOR THE MILL CREEK DEEP
SERVICE REQUEST NUMBER 14064.
DOXSEE K~RI
WEYERHAEUSER ~N~LYTICAL AND TESTING SERVICES
LYTLE CHUCK
TETR~' TECH, INC.
LETTER
PAGES: 1
TILL SAMPLES,
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~--~
FILE: 202160~
TITLE/SUBJECT I
~UTHORI
ORGAN I ZAT I ON:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANI Z~TION I
DOCUMENT TYPE I
NU~BER: 100076A DATE I 00/00/00 PAGES: 215
D~T~ P~CKAGE REPORT FOR THE MILL CREEK DEEP TILL SAMPLES FOR
THE ~ILL CREEK RI/FS PROJECT.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 202160~
TITLE/SUBJECT I
~UTHORr
ORGAN I Z~T IONI
ADDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZ~TIONr
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER I 100077
TR~NSMITTAL OF THE PRE-LE~CH
POST-LEACH SOIL ~ND LEACH~TE
DRAFT QA/~C SECTION FRO~ THE
MEMOR~NDU~.
LYTLE. CH~RLES R.
TETR~ TECH,. INC.
BISHOP MIKE
USEP~-VIII, MONTAN~ OFFICE
LETTER
DATEI0~/17/86 P~GESI 1
TEST SOIL DAT~ P~CK~GE THE
DAT~ P~CK~GE~ ~ND ~ COPY OF THE
LEACH TEST T~CHNICAL
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~---
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/67 ~DMINIS'rR~TIVE RECORD INDEX PC\Qe:
-----------=============================================================----: j
FILE--:;02160g NLlltBER: 100076 D~TE: 07/25/66 PAGES ~-i-~
TITLt/5UBJECTa TRANSMITTAL OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS PERFORMED UNDER SERVICE ~
REQUEST NUMBER 13g65.
AUTHOR: DOXSEE KARl
ORGANIZATION: WEYERHAEUSER ANALYTICAL AND TESTING SERVICES
ADDRESSEE: LYTLE, CHUCK
ORGANIZATION: TETRA TECH, INC.
DOCUMENT TYPE: LETTER
----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
FILE: 202160g
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORG~NI ZATI ON:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGAN I ZAT ION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 10007g D~TE: 00/00/00 PAGES: 7
QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL SECTION FROM THE LEACH
TEST TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT IND ICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT /STUDY
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 20216~
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
~BER : 100080 DATE. 06/13/86 PAGES: 208
ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR ANACONDA SOIL SAMPLES PERFORMED
UNDER SERVICE REQUEST NUMBER 13g6~.
CH~IN OF CUSTODY RECORDS INCLUDED.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT /STUDY
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 2021609
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANI ZAT ION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANI ZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100081 DATE: 07/22/86
TRANSMITTAL OF THE RESULTS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF THE
SOIL SR"PLES WHICH WERE RECEIVED ON JUNE 20, 1~86.
BOLLINGER MARK J.
ROCKY MOUNTAIN ANALYTICAL LABORATORY (RM~L)
LYTLE CJ-I.JCK
TETRA'TECH, INC.
LETTER
PQGES: 1
THREE
---~-------------------------------------------------------------------------.
FILE: 20~1609
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGAN I ZAT ION.
DOCUMENT TY PE :
Nl.JIfBER: 10121081 A
RESULTS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF
MILL CREEK RI/FS PROJECT.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
DATE. 06/1g/86E P~GES: 3
THREE SOIL sAM~LES FOR THE
-----------------------------------------------------
-------------------
FILE. 202160'9
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR I
ORG~NI ZATICJh
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATI~I
DOCUMENT TYPE I
NUMBER. 100081B DATE: 0121/0121/00 ~~GESI 13
-TABLE J - ~ERRY'S ~TH TABLF. 21-12 - SIEVE SIZES" AND
-STANDARD METHOD FOR PARTICLE-SIZE ANALYSIS OF SOILS. II
NOT INDI~TED .
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT ISTUDY
----------------------------------------------------.
-------------------
FILE: 20216"9
TITLE/SUBJECTs
AUTHOR:
ORGAN I ZAT I CJI4:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATICN:
DOCUMENT TY PE I
~ER: 100082 DATE: 0121/00/0121
METHOD ~MARY DATES OF ANALYSIS QC CALI8ARATION
YERIFICATION sUMMARYt QC DUPLICATE SUMMARY, AND QC
SUMMARY FOR PROJECT b 1616.
NOT INDICATED
ROCKY ~TAIN ANALYTICAL LABORATORY
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT ISTUDY
PAGES: 4
SPIKE
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OP~R~BLE UNIT
10/01/87 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX P~ge: 2~
~=======================--------========-----------==--------------------------
FILE: 202160~ NUMBER~-100083 -----DATE~-00/00/00---------PAGES~-~---
TITLE/SUBJECT: "SOIL COLUMN LEACH TEST - FIELD AND LABORATORY PROCEDURES"
FIELD PROCEDURES STEP 1 THROUGH STEP S.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
AUTHOR:
ORG~NIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZATION:
DOCUMENT TV PE :
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 20Z160~
TI TLE/SUBJECT a
~UTHORa
ORG~NIZ~TIONI
~DDRESSEEa
ORG~NIZATIONI
DOCUMENT TYPE a
NUMSERI 100084 DATE a 00/00/00
COPIES OF NOTEBOOK PAGES DOCUMENTING MILL CREEK
SAMPLING WHICH TOOK PLACE JUNE 9, 1986 AND JUNE
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDICATED
H~NDWRITTEN NOTES
PAGES: 1 2
RI/FS
10, 1'386.
----------------------------------------------------------------~--------~~~~=
FILEa 2021609
TITLE/SUBJECT I
~THORI
ORG~NIZATIONI
~DDRESSEE.
ORG~NIZATION:
DOCUIENT TYPE a
NUMSERI 10008~ DATEI 00/00/00 PAGES: 8
"TABLE ~ - FIELD DAT~ SHEET PHASE II SOILS INVESTIG~TION
~NACONDA RI/FS"--SOIL PROFILLE D~T~. "DOUBLE RING
INFILTRATION TEST"--RESULTS FROM THt MILL CREEK RI/FS
SOIL LEACH TEST.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MISCELLANEOUS
-------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~==
FILEI 2021609
~TI TLE/SUBJECT a
AUTHOR I
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATIONa
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER I 100086 DATE a 00/00/00 PAGES: 18
COPIES OF G.L. RUPP'S NOTEBOOK PAGES DOCUMENTING WATER
SAMPLING IN MILL CREEK. (PAGES ARE DATED FROM 12/~/8~ TO
1/~8/86)
RUPPI. GRETCHEN
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
HANDWRITTEN NOTES
----------------------------------------------~---------------------------~~~~
FILE. i20i21609
TI TLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE a
ORGANIZATIONI
DOCUMENT TY PE .
NUMBER I 100087 DATEa 03/00/86 PAGES: 9~
"ANACONDA SMELTER RI/FS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO.4 -
DOMESTIC WELLWATER SAMPLING"--THE OBJECTIVE OF THE SAMPLING
WAS TO VERIFY THAT DOMESTIC WELLS HAVE NOT BEEN ADVERSELY
AFFECTED BY OVERLYING SOIL CONTAMINANTS.
NOT INDICATED
TETRA TECH'r INC.
NOT INDICA ED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
----------------------------------------------------------------------------~~
FILEa 2021609
TI TLE/SUBJECT I
t:WTHO R I
ORGANIZATIONa
ADDRESSEE.
DORGANI ZATIONI
OCUMENT TYPE a
NUMBER. 100088 D~TEa 02/20/86 PAGES: 1
TR~NSMITTAL OF THE FINAL REPORT FOR MERCURY ANALYSIS
SUBMITTED UNDER SERVICE REQUEST NUMBERS 13242 AND 13408, AND
~ REANALYSIS OF ONE SAMPLE EACH FROM SERVICE REQUESTS
12611 AND 12932.
SHELTON MIKE
WEYERHAEUSER ANALYTICAL AND TESTING SERVICES
LYTLE CHUCK
TETRA'TECH, INC.
LETTER
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~N~COND~ S~ELTER SITE
MILL CREEK ~ONT~NA OPER~BLE UNIT
1121/1211/87 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX Page: 2
F=LE~=202i609========~R~=7000e;===-=====DATE~=00i00i00=========PAGES~=337.
TITLE/SUBJECT: DATA.~CKAGES FOR SERVICE REQUEST NUMBERS 13408L 13242 OF
ANACONDA WATER S~MPLES, AND ANOTHER DATA PACKAG~ WITH NO
SERVICE REQUEST NUMBER WHICH COULD BE SERVICE REQUEST
NUMBER 12611 AND/OR 12932 AS SPECIFIED IN THE COVER LETTER.
NOT INDI~TED
NOT INDI~TED
NOT INDI~TED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021701
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZ~TION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGAN IZ~T I ON:
DOCUI'tENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 11211211211211 DATE. 1213/01/79 P~GES: as
PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE ~NACONDA SMELTER SITE AND SURROUNDING
BUILDINGS.DOCUMENT ~LSO INCLUDES PHOTOS BY MIKE DAVENPORT
~BOUT TIE SL~G DUMPING ON JUNE-10-11t1980 ~ND A MEMO CONCERN
ING THE SLAG OBSERVATION. DOCUMENT ~ SO INCLUDES PHOTOS OF
SNOW CONTAMINATION AND HANDWRITTEN NOTES
~LKEMA KEN
USEPA-VIII'r MONTAN~ OFFICE
NOT INDICA ED
NOT INDICATED
PHOTO/SLIDE
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 2021701
TITLE/SUBJECT.
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZ~TION.
DOCUMENT TYPE:
~ER. 11210001A DATE. 11/29/79 PAGES: 4
POTENTIAL H~Z~RDOUS WASTE SITE IDENTIFICATION ~ND
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT FORM FOR ORE PROCESSING OPER~TIONS
ON THE ~CONDA COMPANY SITE, ANACONDA MT.
I LLEG I St.E
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
LOG/DAILY REPORT
----------------------------------------------------------------------------_.
FILE. 20~H 701
TITLE/SUBJECT.
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCU~ENT TYPE:
~R: 100001B DATE. 00/00/80 PAGES: 6
A 1981 CENSUS REPORT BROKEN DOWN BY R~CI~L POPULATION FOR
DEER LODGE COUNTY, ~NACONDA DIVISION'r SILVER BOW COUNTY AND
AND BUTTE MONTANA, ~ND CO~BINATIONS HEREOF.
NOT INDICATED
MONTANA DEPART~ENT OF COM~UNITY ~FF~IRS
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT /STUDY
----------------------------------------------------
----------------------
FILE: 2021701
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR,
ORGANIZ~TIONI
~DDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION,
DOCUMENT TYPE.
~ER. 100001C DATE. 00/00/80 PAGES I 1
SUMM~RY OF W~TER QU~LITY SA~PLING - ANACOND~ COPPER CO. POND
SYSTE~~ (FOR WELL . ~~ 1) ON SAMPLING D~TES ~/13/79, 1Z/6/79
3/29/~\ 6/12/60, AND 8/21/80
NOT I NO CATED
NOT INDI~TED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDI~TED
PHOTO/SLIDE
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021701
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZ~TION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
~R: 1000010 DATE: 06/28/82E PAGES I 26
HAZ~RDaJS R~NKING SYSTEM (HRS) FOR THE ANACONDA SMEl.TER
F~CILITY, ANACOND~ MT. DOCUMENT INCLUDES DOCUMENTATION
RECORDS} AND POTENTI~L HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE - SITE
INSPECT ON REPORT
NOT INDICATED
USEP~-~I I I
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT /STUDY
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONT~N~ OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/87 ~DMINIS~RATIVE RECORD INDEX P~ge:
==~=====================-=-~=---=====--==.--=--------------------------------
FILE: 2021701 NUM~E~: i;;001E -- --D~i~;-i~;i~;~~---------~~~~~;-~~-
. TITLE/SUBJECT: POT~NTI~L HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE - SITE INSPECTION REPORT
FOR THE AN~COND~ SMELTER, ANACONDA MT.
~UTHOR: DUNN JIM .
ORG~NIZATION: USEP~-VIII
~DDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
ORG~NIZATION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: REPORT/STUDY
----------------------------------------------------------------------------~-
FILE: 2021701
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100001F D~TE: 0~/01/e3 P~GES: 14S
REPORT ENTITLED: SCREENING STUDY - ANACOND~ SMELTER SITE
AN~COND~,. MONT~NA. (INSERTED INSIDE DOCUMENT IS A COVER
LETTER AND WELL IS9, DAT~ SEE DOCUMENT 1100002)
NOT INDIC~TED
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC)
NOT INDICATED
USEPA
REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~~~~
FILE: 2021701
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100002 DATE: 10/31/83 PAGES~ 2
COVER LETTER TR~NSMITTING DAT~ FOR CHRIST HAVEN WELL 159
THAT PREVIOUSLY HAD AN ELEV~TED MERCURY REPORT. THE LETTER
DIRECTS ATTENTION TO THE F~CT THAT THE SUBMITTED D~TA FOR
THE WELL INDICATES COMPLIANCE OF LESS THAN .001 MG/L.
(DAT~ ATT~CHED ON PAGE 2)
WINDORSKI JIM
AN~CONDA MINER~LS COMPANY (~MC)
WARDELL JOHN
USEPA-v1II, MONTAN~ OFFICE
LETTER
------------------------------------------------------------------------~~-~~~
FILE: 2021701
TITLE/SUBJECT:
! ~UTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER: 100003
REPORT ENTITLED: SCREENING
MAY 1,. 1983 - ~PPENDICES
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
DATE: 0~/01/83 . P~GES: 163
STUDY - ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
------------------------------------------------------------------------~-~~~~
FILE: 2021701
TI TLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR :
ORGANIZATION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER: 100004
uSUMM~RY OF WATER RESOURCES
COPPER COMPANY POND SYSTEM,
BOTZ1. M. K.
HYDRuMETRICS
NOT INDICATED
ANACONDA COPPER COMPANY
REPORT/STUDY
DATE. 02/27/81 PAGES: 223
IN THE VICINITY OF THE ANACONDA
DEER LODGE COUNTY, MONTANA"
----------------------------------------------------------------------------~-
FILE: 2021701
TI TLE/SUBJECT :
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
~DDRESSEE:
DORG~NI ZATION:
OCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 10000~ DATE. 03/11/81 PAGES: ~4
.~NACONDA REDUCTION DEP~RTMENT - ANACOND~, MONTANA - SOLID
WASTE INVENTORY"--INCLUDES THE OBJECTIVE1. SCOPE~ EXCLUSIONS,
RESULTS,. ~NALYTICAL & SAMPLING PROCEDURE~~ REFEHENCES,
~PPENDI~ ~ - SITE D~TA SHEETS, AND APPEND!X B - SITE
LOCATION ~ND MAP.
CREZAN LARRY
HEALTH'AND ENVIRONMENT
NOT INDICATED
USEPA
REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/87 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX P.;\ge: ~
=-:-------==============================================================----.
F I LE~-a02171211 NUMBER z 100006 DATE z 0'3/00/81 PAGES ~-9-=
TITLE/SUBJECTz "PHOTOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE STUDY SITES
WESTERN MONTANA" (TS-AMD-81059) LOCATION OF THE ANACONDA
COMP~NY INDICATED ON MAP, WITH AERIAL PHOTOS OF LOCATION
ATTACHED.
NOT INDICATED
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING SYSTEMS LABORATORY
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MAP/DRAWING/DIAGRAM
AUTHORz
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEz 2021701
TITLE/SUBJECTz
AUTHORz
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATIONz
DOCU/'ItENT TYPEz
NU/'ItBERz 100007 DATE: 00/00/7'3 PAGES: 31
CHEMICAL DESCRIPTION AND CHARACTERISTICS OF ARSENIC,.
CADMIUM COPPER LEAD MERCURY AND ZINC COMPOUNDS IN:
"DANGERbus PROP~RTIES'OF INDUSTRIAL MATERIALS. II (FIFTH
EDITION)
SAX N. IRVING
VAN'NOSTRAND REINHOLD COMPANY
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MISCELLANEOUS
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 2021701
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEEz
ORGANIZATIONz
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 100007A DATE. 08/23/84 PAGES. a
TITLE PAGE FOR THE "REPORT OF SAMPLING ACTIVITIES FOR
RESIDENTIAL DUST AND SOIL SAMPLING IN ANACONDA~ MONTANA AND
SURROUNDING COMMUNITIES". (TDD R8-8~04-0a) ATrACHED IS A
REFERENCE TO DOCUMENT 2021702, 174.
FRANZEN DAVE
ECOLOGY' & ENVIRONMENT, INC. (E&E)
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-V1IIb MONTANA OFFICE
MISCELLANE US
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEz 2021701
TITLE/SUBJECTz
. AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATIONz
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATIONz
DOCUMENT TYPEz
NUMBERz 100008 DATE. 11/00/84 PAGESr 28
HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN FOR ANACONDA SMELTER RI/FS PROJECT ~
DOCUMENT SPECIFIES POLICY AND GUIDANCE FOR THE CONDUCT OF ,
FIELD PERSONNEL TO MINIMIZE HEALTH AND ACCIDENT RISKS ~HILE
WORK I NG.
NOT INDICATED
TETRA TECH1. INC.
NOT INDICA,ED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 2021701
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUlltENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 100008A DATE. 11/00/84E PAGES. 9
ATTACHMENT B - ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY SAFETY/SAMPLING
PLAN. DOCUMENT CONTAINS INTERNAL MEMOS AND TRANSMITTAL OF
OTHER MEMOS CONCERNING THE POSTED ON-SITE SAFETY RULES .AND
HOUSEKEEPING PROCEDURES USED AT WORK
NOT INDICATED
ANACONDA MINERALS COlltPANY (AlltC)
NOT INDICATED
ANACONDA MINERALS COlltPANY (AMC)
MElitO
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 2021701
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATIONz
ADDRESSEEr
ORGANIZATIONz
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 100009 DATE. 12/04/84 PAGESr 148
FINAL QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR ANACONDA SMELTER
RI/FS ANACONDA MONTANA. (INTERNAL DOC.' 77.8LI8.0)
DOCUMENT ALSO CONTAINS AN APPENDIX ENTITLEDz DOCUMENT
CONTROL PROCEDURES WHICH IS A DRAFT
LaVELL~ DOUGLAS W.
CH2M HLLL
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/87 AD,.,INISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX Page; .:
======8===========~===================================------=====--.--------~
FILE. 2021701 NU,.,BER: 100010 DATE I 12/04/84-- --PAGES:-~--
TITLE/SUBJECT. TRANSMITTAL OF THREE COPIES OF REVISIONS TO THE FINAL' .
~UALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN
FRANZEN, DAVE
ECOLOGY & ENVIRONMENT, INC.
AUTHOR. NOT INDfCATED
ORGANIZATION. TETRA TECH~ INC.
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICArED
ORGANIZATION: ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY
DOCUMENT TYPE. REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONT~N~ OPER~BLE UNIT
10/01/87 . ~DMINIS'rR~TIVE RECORD INDEX Page: ~
-_:l.=:I:I==.=:a=====.~=~=.._=.=._.a___--:a::la==~:I:8.:I====..=-=--a.- ==-=== = === = =.=-==,=.
FILE: 2021701 NUMBER: 100012~ D~TE. 07/00/8~ PAGES, 2'
TITLE/SUBJECT: TITLE PAGE FOR d'~N~COND~'r MONTAN~ - JULY 198~ ARSENIC STUDYII\~t
ATTACHED IS A REFERENCE 0 DOCUMENT 2021707, 100003.
~UTHOR: BINDER SUE (M.D.)
ORGANIZATION: CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL (CDC)
ADDRESSEE, NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: MISCELLANEOUS
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE' 2021701
TITLE/SUS.1ECT,
~UTHOR .
ORGf='N IZAT I ON,
ADDRESSEE,
ORG~NIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER: 100012B . D~TE: 09/04/8~ PAGES: 2
FIRST PAGE OF A CORRESPONDENCE REGARDING SOIL SAMPLING IN
THE ~ILL CREEK AREA OF ANACONDA MONTANA TOO R8-8~04-08.
TASULATED CONCENTRATIONS OF ARSENIC AND tEAD IN SOIL~ INDOOR
AIR AND VACUUM OUST SAMPLES. ATTACHED IS A REFERENC~ TO
DOCUMENT 2021702, 173.
FRANZEN DAVE
ECOLOGY" ENVIRONMENT, INC. REFERENCES/APPENDICES INCLUDE:
COMPILATION OF SOIL DATA COLLECTED IN COM~UNITIES NEAR THE
ANACONDA SMELTER AND IN THE CONTROL CO~~UNITIES.
AUTHOR: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION. CAMP DRESSER & McKEE, INC. (CD~)
ADDRESSEE. NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION. USEPA-VIIIb MONTANA OFFICE
DOCUMENT TYPE. REPORT/STU Y
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021701
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR:
ORGf='NIZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 100013A Df='TE. 12/02/8~ PAGES: 25
REGARDING "PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF THE RESIDENTIAL DUST AND
SOIL SAMPLING IN ANACONDA MONTANA AND SURROUNDING
COMMUNITIES". INCLUDES TABULATED CONCENTRATIONS OF ARSENIC:,
LEAD, AND CADMIUM IN INDOOR AIR, VACUUM DUST AND SOIL
SAMPL.ES. (TDD R8-8~ 11-11 ) .
FRANZEN DAVE
ECOLOGY'& ENVIRON~ENT, INC.
-------
~N~COND~ S~ELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
.0/01/87 ADMINIS'rR~TIVE RECORD INDEX P~ge: :=
I============~===========---~=-==~==========----------------------------------
~ILEI 2021701 NUMBER; 100013C . DATE~-12720785---------PAGES~-S---
'ITLE/SUBJECT: REGARDING EVIDENCE OF OFF-SITE SOIL CONTAMINATION FROM
PAST SMELTER EMISSIONS.
(DOCUMENT CONTROL NO. 228-TSI-RJ-CARN-1)
ERICSON JIM
CAMP DRESSER & McKEE, INC. (CDM)
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
MEMO
AUTHOR:
ORGAN I ZAT I ON:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGAN I ZAT I ON :
)OCUMENT TYPE I
.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
~ILE. 2021701
rIfLE/SUBJECT I
NUMBER: 100014 D~TEI 12/00/85 PAGES: 42
REPORT ENTITLED: SUMMARY OF AVAILABLE SOILS DATA MILL CREEK,
MONTANA. (HANDWRITTEN NOTES ON PAGE 13~ ALSO ATTACHED MEMO
WITH RESULTS OF ARSENIC AN~LYSES OF MLLL CREEK DRINKING
W~TER SAMPLES FROM GARY BIGHAM TO MIKE BISHOP 10/24/85
NOT INDICATED
TETR~ TECH'r INC.
NOT INDICA ED
AN~CONDA MINERALS COMPANY CAMC)
REPORT/STUDY
. .
._----------------------------------------------~--------------~--------~~~~~~
~UTHOR.
ORGAN I Z~T I ON I
ADDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZ~TIONI
)OCUMENT TY PE I
~ILEI 2021701
rIfLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR.
ORG~NI Z~TION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORG~N I Z~T ION I
)OCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 100014~ DATE. 02/13/86 P~GE$: 31
"REPORT OF SAMPLING ACTIVITIES FOR RESIDENTIAL INDOOR DUST,
S~MPLING FOR THE MILL CREEK AREA OF ANACONDA, MONTANA"
(TDD R8-8S06-07)
FRANZEN, DAVE
ECOLOGY & ENVIRONMENT, INC. (E&E)
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-~IIIb MONTANA OFFICE
REPORT/STU Y
.--------------------------------------------------------------------~-----~~~
~'ILEI 2021701
rITLE/SUBJECT.
-- AUTHO R I
ORGAN I ZAT I ON I
ADDRESSEE I
ORGAN I ZAT I ON I
)OCUMENT TYPE I
NUMBER. 100014B DATE. 01/17/86 PAGES: 61
TR~NSMITTAL AND A REPORT TITLED: "ANALYTICAL RESULTS
FOR RESIDENTIAL DUST AND SOIL SAMPLING IN ANACONDA,
MONTANAL AND SURROUNDING COMMUNITIES. (TDD R8-8~11-11)
RICHARD~ON STUART
ECOLOGY &. ENVIRONMENT, INC. (EI-E)
SCHWAB, KEITH
USEPA
REPORT/STUDY
.-------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~~
~ILEI 2021701
fITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
ORGAN I ZATION.
ADDRESSEE I
ORGAN I ZAT I ON:
)OCUMENT TY PE .
NUMBER I 10001~ DATE. 03/00/86
REPORT ENTITLED: ANACOND~ SMELTER RI/FS TECHNICAL
MEMORANDUM NO.4 - DOMESTIC WELLWATER SAMPLING
NOT INDICATED
TETR~ TECH'r INC.
NOT INDICA ED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
PAGES, 24
.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
~ILEI 2021701 NUMBER. 100016 DATEI 02/22/84E PAGES I 2
rITLE/SUBJECT. ;g~~~~~!~~~O~u~Ey2~DOF ~~~8~~~~sSC~E~~ROBs~~eigN~~LEASE,
WASTE CHARACTERISTICSL AND TARGETS UNDER THE HEADINGS
GROUNDWATER ROUTE, SU~FACE WATER ROUTE, AND AIR ROUTE.
AUTHOR. NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATIONI NOT INDICATED
ADDRESSEE I NOT INDICATED
)OOCRGANIZATIONI NOT INDICATED
UMENT TYPE. MISCELLANEOUS
.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONT~N~ OPER~BLE UNIT
10/01/87 ~DMINIS'rR~TIVE RECORD INDEX p,age: 3
..==~==========~====.=======~===~===~====.=========~========c===~=============
FILE I 2021701 NUMBER I 100017 D~TE I 1 2/00/84 P~GES I 7';
TITLE/SUBJECT. "ANACONDA SMELTER RI/FS - STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES"
(AN INCOMPLETE COpy IS LOCATED IN THE FRONT POCKET)
AUTHORI BIGHAM GARY N.
ORG~NIZ~TIONI TETRA tECHL INC.
ADDRESSEEI NOT INDICAIED
ORGANIZATION. ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC)
DOCUMENT TYPE: REPORT/STUDY
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 2021701
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
~DDRESSEE.
ORGAN IZAT ION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 100018 D~TEI 00/00/86 PAGES I 36
"ASSESSMENT NOTICE OF PROPERTY SUBJECT TO TAXATION
~NACONDA-DEER LODGE COUNTY"--INDICATES THE OWNER O~ THE
PARCEL~ OWNER INFORMATION, AND A DESCRIPTION OF THEIR
HOLDINI,;S.
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDIC~TED
MISCELLANEOUS
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 2021701
TITLEISUBJECT.
~UTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 100019 DATE. 09/00/87 PAGES. 31E
"FINAL REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION REPORT MILL CREEK, MONTANA
~NACONDA SMELTER SUPERFUND SITE, FIRST OPERABLE UNIT"
(EPA APPROVED VERSION 10/2/87)
NOT INDICATED
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC)
NOT INDICATED
USEPA-VIII
REPORT/STUDY
---------------------------------------------------------------------~-------
FILE. 2021701
TITLE/SUBJECT.
~UTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 100020 DATE. 09/28/87 PAGES I 2a~
"FINAL FEASIBILITY STUDY REPORT MILL CREEK!;. 1I10NT~NA'r
ANACOND~ SMELTER SUPERFUND SITE, FIRST OPEM~BLE UNI
VOLUME I" (EPA APPROVED VERSION 10/2/87)
NOT INDIC~TED
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC)
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FIL.E. 2021701
TITLE/SUBJECT.
~UTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 100021 DATE. 09/00/87 PAGES: 1';~
"FINAL. FEASIBILITY STUDY REPORT "'ILL CREEKL 1I10NTANAt
~N~COND~ SMELTER SUPERFUND SITE FIRSt OPEMABLE UNI
VOL.UME II - APPENDICES" (EPA APPROVED VERSION 10/2/87)
NOT INDICATED .
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC)
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDIC~TED
REPORT/STUDY
----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
FILE. 2021701
TITLE/SUBJECT.
~UTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
~DDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 100022 DATE. 10/00/87 PAGES. 15~
-ENDANGERMENT ~SSESSMENT/PUBLIC HE~LTH EVALUATION.
MILL. CREEK, MONT~NA ~NACONDA SII1ELTER SITE REVISED FINAL
REPORT"
NOT INDICATED
CL.EMENT & ASSOCIATES, INC.
NOT INDICATED
USEPA-VIIIb MONTANA OFFICE
REPORT/STU Y
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/87 ~DMINIS'rRATIVE RECORD INDEX P"'ge: 40
==s=_._======================-=========:-----=-======--=----------------------
~ILE: 20Z1702 NUMBER: 100001 ----CATE: 00/00/84---------PAGES~-3---
rITLE/SUBJECT: "A MULTI-MEDIA RISK ANALYSIS OF LE~D EXPOSURE FROM SECONDA~v
LEAD SMELTER EMISSIONS1. AND RESULTING REMEDIAL ACTIONS":
PRESENTED AT THE 77TH~NNUAL MEETING OF THE AIR
POLLUTION CONTROL ASSOCIATION IN SAN FRANCISCO, JUNE 24-29,
1984.
SIERMAb T.J.b ET AL.
NOT IN ICATE
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
AUTHOR:
ORGAN I ZAT I ON:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGAN I Z A T ION:
)OCUMENT TYPE:
.---------------------------------------------------------------------------~-
~ILE: 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR :
ORG~NI Z~TION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
OOCUMENT TY PE :
NUMBER: 100002 DATE: 03/10/86 PAGES: 1
RESPONSE TO A REQUEST THAT URINARY ARSENIC TESTING BE
OFFERED TO ~LL MILL CREEK RESIDENTS AND THAT A HEALTH STUDY
BE CONDUCTED. THE AUTHOR FEELS THESE TESTINGS AND STUDIES
SHOULD NOT BE DONE.
~~~~~~S ~g~ 6~S~A~E CONTROL (CDC>
BUYNOWSKI1 GEORGE
NOT INDICHTED
MEMO
-------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~~~
~ILE. 2021702 NUMBER: 100003 DATE: 11/06/8~E PAGES: 2
TITLE/SUBJECT: "ARSENIC EXPOSURE IN CHILDREN LIVING NEAR THE FORMER COPPER
SMELTER AT ANACONDA~ MONTANA"--AN ARSENIC EXPOSURE SURVEY
IN MARCH OF 198~ SHuWED THAT MILL CREEK PRESCHOOL CHILDREN
HAVE MORE ARSENIC EXPOSURE THAN CHILDREN FROM ANY OTHER
COMMUNITY NEAR ANACONDA; A RETEST WILL TAKE PLACE IN SUMMER.
ORGANI~~+~g~: ~~~¥~~S ~g~ ~~S~A~E CONTROL (CDC>
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDIC~TED
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
OOCUJltENT TYPE. REPORT/STUDY
~~:;~-~~~~~~;~-------~~:~~~~-~~~~~:---------~~~~~-~~~~~~~~-~-------~~~~;~-~:--
TITLE/SUBJECT.. "APPENDIX 23 - ESTIMATING THE AMOUNT OF SOIL INGESTED BY
" YOUNG CHILDREN THROUGH TRACER ELEMENTS"--TESTING OF A
MODIFIED METHOD TO DETERMINE THE ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF SOIL
INGESTED BY TODDLERS.
g~~~~~s ~~~ ~~S~A~E CONTROL (CDC>
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
AUTHOR:
ORGAN I ZATION:
ADDRESSEE.
ORGAN I ZAT I ON:
OOCUMENT TYPE:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------~
nLE. 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT.
~UTHORI
ORG~NI ZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGAN I ZAT I ON:
OOCUMENT TY PE .
NUMBER: 10000~ DATE. 00/0~/00 PAGES: 16
"ESTIMATING SOIL INGESTION"--THE USE OF TRACER ELEMENTS IN
ESTIMATING THE AMOUNT OF SOIL INGESTED BY YOUNG CHILDREN.
BINDER SUE (M.D. >
CENTERS FOR DISE~SE CONTROL (CDC>
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------~
~ILE: 2021702 NUMBER. 100006 DATE: 03/00/83" PAGES, '3
rITLE/SUBJECTI "IMPLICATIONS OF THE MULTISTAGE THEORY OF CARCINOGENESIS
APPLIED TO OCCUPATIONAL ARSENIC EXPOSURE".VOL 70(3) :4~~-463.
PREDICT~ DIFFERENT RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN EXCESS CARCINOGENIC
RISK AND DURATION OF EXPOSURE, AGE AT INITIAL EXPOSURE AND
FOLLOW-UP TIME SINCE EXPOSURE STOPPED.
AUTHOR: BROWN CHARLES C. ET AL.
ORGANIZATION: JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE (JNCI)
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
~CUMENT TYPE: NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
----------------------------------------------------------------------------~~
-------
ANACOND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/87 ADMINIStRATIVE RECORD INDEX Page: . I
..~================.==~a..==a..===a=========~===.===========================.~_:
FILE: 2021702 NlMBER. 100007 DATE. 01/00/ 8S PAGES I. 42~'
TITLE/SUBJECT. "PREVENTING LEAD POISONING IN YOUNG CHILDREN"--A REPORT ON
LEAD- IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND ITS EFFECTS ON CHILDREN..
AUTHOR. NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION: CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION. NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE. REPORT/STUDY
--------------------~-------------------------------------------------------.
FILE. 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NlJI'BER. 100008 DATE. 04/10/8:5 PAGES: 26
REVISION OF THE DRAFT REVIEW OF THE PRELIMINARY ENDANGERMENT
ASSESSMENT DUE TO ADDITIONAL WORK PLAN DOCUMENTS AND REPORTS
WHICH WERE O~TAINED AND A SITE INSPECTION WHICH TOOK PLACE
ON JANUARY 1:5-18~ 1~8~.
KAY ROBERT L. J~.
CEN~ERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL (CDC)
BINDER SUE (M.D.)
CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL (CDC)
MEMO
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 2021702
TITLE/SUB.JECT.
AUTHOR.
ORG~NIZ~TION.
ADDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100010
-THE MULTISTAGE MODEL WITH A
APPLICATIONS TO CARCINOGENIC
VOL 4(3):163-176.
CRUMP~ KENNY S., ET AL.
RISK RNALYSIS
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
D~TE. 00/00/84 PAGES. 14
TIME-DEPENDENT DOSE PATTERN:
RISK ASSESSMENT II .
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT.
-., AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER. 100011 DATE. 00/00/00 PAGES. 7
-A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY ON MALIGNANT NEOPLASMS OF BLADDER
LUNG AND LIVER IN BLACKFOOT DISEASE ENDEMIC AREA IN TAIWAN"
VOL. :53:J~~-40~.
CHEN~ C.J.L ET AL.
BR. JOURNA OF CANCER
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021702
TITLE/SUB.JECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE.
N\.IImER: 100012 D~TE: 00/00/8~ PAGES; 23
"TITLE 40 - PROTECTION OF ENVIRONMENT - CHAPTER I--
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY"--PART 141: NATIONAL
INTERIM PRIMARY DRINKING WATER REGULATIONS. PAGES 238-283.
NOT INDICATED
CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
I'IISCELu:\NEOUS
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 20217.
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER. 100013 D~TE. 00/00/00 PAGES. 2
-HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENTS FOR CONTAMINATED SOILS" IN: THE
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ~TH NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT OF
UNCONTROLLED HAZARDOUS WASTE SITES. WASHINGTON D.C. NOV.7-g,
DISCUSSES A METHOD DEVISED TO UTILIZE SOIL INGESTION DATA &
CERTAIN HEALTH CRITERIA TO CALCULATE HEALTH-RELATED SOIL CRT
FORD} KARL L., ET AL.
. NOT NDI~TED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~NACONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/87 ,ADMINIStRAT IVE RECORD INDEX' Page: '"
=====================================================---------======----------
fILEI 2021702 NUMBERs 100014 DATEI 00/~~7i~---- P~~~~~-i7--
,TITLE/SUBJECT I "HEAVY METAL EXPOSURE IN POPULATIONS LIVING AROUND ZINC AND'
COPPER SMELTERS". VOL~ 38(5) :264-a~4
~UTHOR: HARTWELL TYLER D. (PH. D. ) . ET AL.
ORG~NIZATION: ARCHIVES' OF ENVIRONMENTAL ~EALTH
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
ORG~NIZATION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEI 2021702
TI TLE/SU8JECT .
AUTHOR.
ORG~NI ZAT ION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATIONI
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER I 10001S DATEI 06/2~/67 PAGES. 10~
"AGDHS - II AIR QUALITY DATA REPORT"--(COMPUTER PRINTOUTS
OF AIR CONCENTRATIONS, WIND SPEEDS, AND TEMPERATURES FOR
ANACONDA VICINITY)
NOT INDICATED
STATE OF MONTANA, DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MISCELLANEOUS
-------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~~=
FILE I 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR I
ORGAN I ZATION.
ADDRESSEE I
ORGAN I ZAT ION I
DOCUMENT TYPE I
NUMBER. 100016 DATE I 00/00/72 PAGES: 16
"ABUNDANCE AND DISTRI8UTION OF LEAD, CADMIUML AND ARSENIC
IN SOILS". PUB. NO. AP-~1. PAGES 6~-e0. THE ~URPOSE OF THE
INVESTIGATION WAS TO DETERMINE THE EXTENT OF CONTAMINATION
OF THE SOILS BY EMISSIONS FROM THE SMELTER OPERATION IN EAST
HELENA.
MIESCH A.T. ET AL.
USEPA,.'OFFICE OF AIR PROGRAMS
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~~
FILE. 2021702
~TITLE/SUBJECT I
, AUTHOR I
ORGANIZATIONs
~DDRESSEEI
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE I
NUMBER. 100017 DATE I 0~/00/79 PAGES: 65
"AN ASSESSMENT OF MINING IMPACTS ON QUALITY OF SURFACE
WATERS IN THE FLINT CREEK RANGE, MONTANA"
INGMAN GARY L.
MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
-------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~=-
FILE. 2021702
TI TLE/SUBJECT .
AUTHOR I
ORGANIZATIONI
ADDRESSEE I
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 100018 DATE. 00/00/00 PAGES. 15
"MONT~NA WATER QUALITY ACT (INCLUDES 197~ REVISIONS)"
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MISCELLANEOUS
--------------------------------------------------~----------------------~~~=
FILE. 202.1702
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE I
ORGAN I ZAT I ON I
DOCUMENT TY PE .
NUMBER. 100019 DATE. 00/00/77 PAGES. 336
-MEDICAL AND BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTANTS:
ARSENIC"
NOT INDICATED
NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~-
-------
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREE~ MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
;~~~;~~~====2=============~~~;~;;!~~~;~;=~~;2:~=;~~;~=================~:2:~. I
FILE: 2\Z121702 NUMBER: 100121e:12I DATE: 1219/121121/80 PAGES: .,: '
TITLE/SUBJECT: .FI~L GENERIC ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEME='NT ON URANIUM ""4
"'ILLING - PROJECT M-26"
AUTHOR: NOT .INDICATED
ORGANIZATION: U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED.
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: R£PORT/STUDY
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 202171212
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 1012112121 DATE: 1211/14/83 PAGES, 4~
.OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE TO INORGANIC ARSENIC (29 CFR PART
1910) "--THIS NOTICE PRESENTS THE FINAL ASSESSMENT OF THE
DEGREF OF RISK FROM OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE TO INORGANIC
~RSENIC AND THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THAT RISK.
NOT IND ICATED
FEDERAL REGISTER
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
III I SCELLANEOUS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 202171212
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 112112112122 DATE: 121121/121121/84 PAGES, 51
-DEPOSITION AND RESUSPENSION". CHAPTER 12 OF "ATOMSPHERIC
SCIENCE AND POWER PRODUCTION". DOE (TIC-27601). DISCUSSES
THE SUBJECT OF THE TRANSPORT OF PARTICLES AND GASES FROM THE
~TMOSPHERE TO ENVIRONMENTAL SURFACES AND FROM THOSE SURFACES
BACK TO THE ATMOSPHERE.
SEJoKL GEORGE A.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT /STUDY
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 202171212
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 112112112123 DATE: 1212/1213/86 PAGES: 5
CC~NTS ON THE CLEMENT'S ENDANGERMENT ASSESSMENT FOR MILL
CREEK MONTANA WHICH THE AUTHOR BELIEVES PRESENTS A
REASONABLE CHARACTERIZATION OF THE RISK IN MILL CREEK, BUT
DOCUMENT COULD HAVE. BENEFITED FROM SO~E ADDITIONAL
INFOR~AT ION.
~ITE PAUL
USEPQ' HEADQUARTERS
DUPREY,. ROBERT L.
IJSEPA-v I I I
LETTER
----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
FILE: 202171212
TITLE/SUBJECTs
AUTHOR:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
~DDRESSE£:
ORG~NIZATION,
DOCUMENT TYPE,
NUMBER: 112112112124 DATE: 11/22/8~E PAGES, 17
CLARIFYING THE REQUIRE~ENT THAT AN ENDANGERMENT ASSESSMENT
BE DEVELOPED TO SUPPORT ALL ADMINISTRATIVE AND JUDICIAL
ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS UNDER SECTION 11216 UNDER CERCLA AND
SECTION 712103 UNDER RCRA. AND ALSO PROVIDES GUIDANCE ON THE
CONTE~T, TIMINGt LEVEL OF DETAIL, FORMAT, AND RESOURCES REQD
PORTER J. WINS ON
USEPA HEADQUARTERS
AE6ION~L ADMINISTRATORS
USEPA, REGIONS I-X
MEMO
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 202171212
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 112101212~ DATE: 1216/2~/8~E PAGES, 17
CLARIFYING THE REQUIREMENT TH~T AN ENDANGER~ENT ASSESSMENT
BE DEVELOPED TO SUPPORT ALL ADMINISTRATIVE AND JUDICIAL
ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS UNDER SECTION 11216 UNDER CERCLA AND
SECTION 7003 UNDER RCRA. AND ALSO PROVIDES GUIDANCE ON THE
CONTENT, TIMING, LEVEL OF DETAIL, FORMAT, AND RESOURCES REQD
plCa~w JACK W.
USEPA HEADQUARTERS
REGIONAL ADMINISTRATORS
USEPA, REGIONS I-X
JI£)II)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONT~N~ OPER~8LE UNIT
10/0:~~:__----------- ~DMINISTR~TIVE RECORD INDEX Page: ~-
-===-----------------===-------======----=--------------------------------- ---
~-ILE: 2021702 NUMBER;-10002~ ---- --DATE;-0~/00/e3---------PAGES~-~---
ITLE/SUBJECT: "U.S. CANCER MORTALITY RATES AND TRENDS1. 1950-1979 -
VOLUME I"--INFORMATION ON MORTALITY RAT!:. BY COUNTY AND STA-::
AND MATER I ALS AND METHODS USED. (EPA-600/ 1-83-015A)
RIGGAN, WILSON 8. (PM. D.) ET AL.
USEPA,. HEALTH EFFECTS RESEARCH LABORATORY
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
AUTHOR:
ORGAN I ZAT I ON:
~DDRESSEE:
ORG~N I ZAT ION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 20a1702
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR.
ORG~N I ZAT I ON:
~DDRESSEE:
ORG~N I ZAT I ON:
DOCUMENT TY PE .
NUMBER. 100027 DATE. 11/28/80 PAGES, ~3
"WATER QUALITY CRITERI~ DOCUMENTSl AVAILABILITY" PART V. EPA
~NNOUNCES THE AVAILABILITY AND PRuVIDES SUMMARIES OF WATER
QUALITY CRITERIA DOCUMENTS FOR 64 TOXIC POLLUT~NTS OR
POLLUT~NT CATEGORIES.
NOT INDICATED
FEDERAL REGISTER
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MISCELLANEOUS
------------------------~----------------------------------------~-------~~-~~
FILEI 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT.
~UTHOR.
ORGAN I ZAT I ON I
~DDRESSEE:
ORG~NI ZATIONI
DOCUMENT TYPE I
NUMBER I 100028 DATE I 00/00/00 PAGES: 2
TRANSMITTAL OF ~N INTERIM POLICY PAPER IN ORDER TO CLARIFY
CERTAIN PORTIONS OF EPA'S AIR QUALITY PERMITTING
RESPONSIBILITIES REGARDING SURFACE MINING OPERATIONS.
MERSON,. ALAN
USEPA=vIII
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
LETTER
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~~
FILE I 2021702.
.tITLE/SUBJECT:
,.. ~UTHOR:
ORGAN I ZATION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORGAN I ZAT I ON:
DOCUMENT TY PE I
NUMBER. 100029
"EPA REGION VIII/INTERIM
REVIEW OF SURF~CE MINING
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
DATE. 00/00/00 PAGES: 44
POLICY PAPER ON THE ~IR QUALITY
OPERATIONS"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~~
FILE. 2021702
TI TLE/SUBJECT I
~UTHORI
ORG~NIZ~TION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORG~N I ZAT I ON.
DOCUMENT TY PE I
NUMBER: 100030 DATE I 08/00/8~ PAGES. 1~6
"ARBITER WORKS DRAFT REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION" (DOCUMENT
CONTROL NO. BAL TTB-053F0)--THE REPORT PRESENTS THE FINDINGS
OF FIELD INVESTIGATIONS ~ND LITERATURE REVIEW, AND THE
CONCLUSIONS REGARDING POTENTIAL PUBLIC HEALTH ENDANGERMENT.
NOT INDICATED
TETRA TECHJ.. INC.
NOT INDICA lED
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC)
REPORT/STUDY
----------------------------------------------------------------------------~~
FILE: 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT I
AUTHOR.
ORG~N I ZAT I ON I
~DDRESSEE.
ORG~N I ZAT I ON.
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER. 100031 DATE I 07/00/86 PAGES. 446
"GEOCHEMISTRY REPORT"--SUMMARIZATION OF THE ~NACONDA SMELTER
TAILINGS COMPOSITIONL HYDROGEOLOGIC SETTINGL SURFACE AND
GROUNDWATER QUALITY ~ND THE RESULTS OF THE ~REDICTIVE
GEOCHEMICAL AND SOLUTE TRANSPORT MODELING.
NOT INDICATED
TETRA TECHL INC.
NOT INDICATED
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC)
REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/81 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX Pag(!: 4'
---z---============a=.~...=..=~~=_m=s=====.============================------
FILE~-Z02110a NUMBER: 100032 DATE: 0'3/00/85 PAGES;-i2;'.
TITLE/SUBJECT: "ANACONDA SMELTER RI/FS - TAILINGS DATA REPORT" (DOCUMENT -~
CONTROL NO. SAL TTS-051D0)--THE GOAL OF THE REPORT IS TO
CHARACTERIZE CONTAMINATION AND PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL
ENVIRONMENTAL PARAMETERS IN SUFFICIENT DETAIL SO THAT AN
ENDANGERMENT ASSESSMENT (EA) CAN BE PERFORMED.
NOT INDICATED
TETRA TECH'r INC.
NOT INDICA ED
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY CAMC)
REPORT/STUDY
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021102
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR:
ORGAN I ZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGAN IZAT ION:
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER: 100034 DATE: 12/00/ 8~ PAGES. 5'3
"ANACONDA SMELTER RI/FS SOILS DATA REPORT PHASE II"--THE
PRIMARY PURPOSES OF THE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION ACTIVITIES
ARE TO CHARACTERIZE CONTAMINATION AND THE PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL
ENVIRONMENTAL VARIABLES IN SUFFICIENT DETAIL TO FACILITATE
THE STAGE I ENDANGERMENT ASSESSMENT.
NOT INDICATED
TETRA TECH'r INC.
NOT INDICA ED
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY CAMC)
REPORT/STUDY
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
FILE. 2021102
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGAN I ZAT ION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 10003~ DATE: 01/00/86 PAGES. 101
"ANACONDA SMELTER RI/FS - SURFACE WATER AND SEDIMENT
INVESTIGATION DATA REPORT - THIRD SAMPLING - FALL 19a~"--THE
GOAL OF STAGE I REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION IS TO CHARACTERI:~
CONTAMINATION AND PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL ENVIRONMENTAL VARIABLES
SO THAT AN ENDANGERMENT ASSESSMENT CAN BE PERFORMED.
NOT INDICATED
TETRA TECH'r INC.
NOT INDICA ED
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY CAMC)
REPORT/STUDY
-------------------------------~----------------------------------------------
FILE. 2021102
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100036 DATE: 10/00/8~E PAGES, 115
"ANACONDA SMELTER RI/FS - SURFACE WATER AND SEDIMENT
INVESTIGATION DATA REPORT - SECOND SAMPLING - SUMMER 198~1I--
THE GOAL OF THE STAGE I REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION IS TO
CHARACTERIZE CONTAMINATION AND PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL
ENVIRONMENTAL VARIA~LES SO THAT AN EA CAN BE DONE.
NOT INDICATED
TETRA TECH'r INC.
NOT INDICA ED
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY CAMC)
REPORT/STUDY
-----------------------------------------------------------~-----------------~
F I1-E : 2021102
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER: 100037 DATE: 07/00/a~ PAGES. 98
"ANACONDA SMELTER RI/FS - SURFACE WATER AND SEDIMENT
INVESTIGATION DATA REPORT - SPRING 19a~"--THE GOAL OF THE
STAGE I REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION IS TO CHARACTERIZE
CONTAMINATION AND PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL ENVIRONMENTAL PARAMETERS
SO THAT AN ENDANGERMENT ASSESSMENT CAN BE PERFORMED.
NOT INDICATED
TETRA TECH'r INC.
NOT INDICA ED
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY CAMC)
REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONT~NA OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/87 ~DMINIS'rR~TIVE RECORD INDEX Page: 4:.
=========================================~======-=====-------=--=-------------
FILE. 2021702 NUMBER. 100038 DATE. 04/0~;i~--- -- --~~~ii~-~---
TITLE/SUBJECT. "THE INFLUENCE OF LEAD, CADMIUM1 AND NICKEL ON THE GROWTH :~
RYEGRASS AND OATS". VOL.. 6a:81-~'3.
~UTHOR: ~LLINSON~ D.W., ET AL.
ORG~NIZ~TION: PLANT ANu SOIL
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 2021702
T I'TLE/SUBJECT I
~UTHOR.
OJfGANI ZATION.
ADDRESSEE I
ORGANIZATIONI
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER. 10003~ D~TEI 07/00/78E PAGES: 4
"ARSENIC LEVELS IN CROPS IRRIGATED WITH WATER CONTAINING
MSMA"--EXAMINATION OF THE POTENTIAL FOR MSMA (MONOSODIUM
METHANEARSONATE)~ AN ORGANIC ARSENICAL POSTEMERGENCE
HERBICIDE, FOR CuNTROL OF IRRIGATION DITCHBANK WEEDS.
ANDERSON~ L.W.J., ET AL.
NOT INDI..~TED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~~
FILE. 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT.
~UTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE I
ORGANIZ~TION.
DOCUMENT TYPE I
NUMBER I 100040 DATE. 00/00/72 PAGES. 3
"TECHNICAL REPORTS - LEAD UPTAKE AND CORN GROWTH WITH
SOIL-~PPLIED LEAD". VOL. 1(1) :'32-94. THE OBJECT OF THE STUDY
WAS TO DETERMINE THE EFFECT OF SOIL-APPLIED LEAD ON
EMERGENCEl. GROWTHL LEAD CONTENT OF GRAIN AND STOVER, AND
GRAIN YIE D OF FI~LD-GROWN CORN.
BAUMHARDT G.R. ET AL.
JOURNAL OF ENVI~ONMENTAL QUALITY
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
---------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~
FILEI 20':1702
TITLE/SUBJECT I
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE I
ORGAN I Z.AT ION I
DOCUMENT TYPE I
NUMBER I 100041 DATE I 00/00/71E PAGES. 15
"TOXIC EFFECTS OF AQUEOUS ~MMONIA COPPER ZINC LEAD
BORON, AND MANGANESE ON ROOT GROWTH". E.W: CARSON", EDITOR,
IN: 'THE PLANT ROOT AND ITS ENVIRONMENT", UNIVER~ITY
PRESS OF VIRGINI~, CHARLOTTESVILLE. PAGES 669-683.
BENNETT" ~.C.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MISCELLANEOUS
---------------------------------------------------------------------------~~-
FILE I 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHORs
ORGANIZ~TIONI
ADDRESSEE.
ORG,::\NIZATIONI
DOCUMENT TYPEI
NUMBER. 100042 DATE I 00/00/7~
"GROWTH AND CADMIUM ACCUMULATION OF PLANTS GROWN
TREATED WITH A CAD~IUM-ENRICHED SEWAGE SLUDGE"
VOL. 4(2) 1207-211
BINGH~M F.T. ET ~L.
JOURNAL'OF EN~IRONMENTAL QU~LITY
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ~RTICLE
PAGES: 5
ON A SOIL
----------------------------------------------------------------------------~-
FILEI 2021702
TI TLE/SUBJECT .
AUTHOR I
ORGANIZ,::\TIONI
~DDRESSEEI
ORG,::\NIZATIONI
DOCUMENT TYPE I
NUMBER. 100043 DATE I 00/00/76 PAGES. 3
"YIELD AND CADMIUM ACCUMULATION OF FORAGE SPECIES IN
RELATION TO CADMIUM CONTENT OF SLUDGE-AMENDED SOIL"
VOL. ~ (1) : ~7-~9.
8INGHA~,- F.T." ET AL.
JOURNAL OF ENvIRONMENTAL QUALITY
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
---------------------------------------------------------------------------~--
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONT~N~ OPER~BLE UNIT
10/01/87 ADMINIStR~TIVE RECORD INDEX Pa e'
.a_---==========2.S==Z8===~a..==~s.~=.=====-=.=======================-_.~-'
FILE;-202i702 PUlBER. 100044 D~TE: 11/00/71 P~GES~-:=~
TITLE/SUBJECTs "CROP RESPONSE TO EXCESSIVE ZINC FERTILIZATION OF ALKALINE ~ ,
SOI~N. YOL. 63:874-876. THE OBJECTIVE OF THIS RESEARCH WAS
TO EVALUATE THE TOLER~NCE OF ENCONOMIC PLANT SPECIES TO
EXCESSIVE LEVELS OF AVAILABLE Zn IN THE SOIL.
BOAWNJ. LOUIS C. L ET ~L.
AG RONuMY JOU RN~
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPERI JOURN~L ART I CLE
~UTHOR :
ORG~NIZATION:
ADDRESSEE.
ORG~NIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEs 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECTs
~UTHOR 1
ORG~NIZ~TIONI
~DDRESSEEI
ORG~NI ZATIONs
DOCUMENT TYPEI
PUlBER. 10004~ D~TE. 09/00/78
"DIFFERENTIAL RESPONSE OF SOYBEAN V~RIETIES TO
~DM IU".. VOL. 70: 7~6-760.
BOGGES~. SAM F ° L ET ~L.
AGRONOI'IT JOURNf:\
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSAAPERI JOURN~L ART I CLE
PAGES: 5
SOIL
. ,
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEI 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT 1
f:\UTHOR 1
ORGf:\NIZ~TIONI
~DDRESSEEI
ORG~NIZATIONI
DOCUMENT TYPE I
PUlER 1 100046 Df:\TEI 00/00/00 PAGES. 18
NCHAPTER 10: THE DISTRI9UTION ~ND MOBILIZ~TION OF MINOR
ElEMENTS IN SOILS" ~ND IICH~PTER 111 ELEMENT~L UPTAKE BY
PLANTSN IN: IIGEOBOT~NY AND BIOGEOCHEMISTRY IN MINER~L
EXPLORATIONN.
BROOKSb R. R.
NOT IN ICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
/It I SCELLANECUS
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEI 2021782
TITLE/SUBJECT.
~UTHOR I
ORG~NIZ~TIONI
~DDRESSEEs
ORGf:\NIZ~TIONI
DOCUMENT TYPE 1
NUMBER I 100047 ~TEI 00/00/8~ PAGES. a
,oGRASS ROOT PENETR~TION IN TOSCO I I PROCESSED OIL SH~LE" IN:
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND ~NNU~L MEETING OF THE AMERIC~N
SOCIETY FOR SURFACE MINING ~ND RECLAM~TION. DISCUSSES
TOSCO II PROCESSED SH~LE REVEGETATION PLOTS ~T THE COLONY
SH~LE OIL PROJECT IN G~RFIELD COUNTY, COLOR~DO.
E4UCKNER1.' DAV I D L. ( Ph. D. )
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNf:\L ~RTICLE
------------------------------------------------~----------------------------
FILE. 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR I
ORGf:\NIZ~TION.
~DDRESSEEI
ORG~NIZATIONI
DOCUMENT TYPE I
~RI 100048 Df:\TEI 00/00/82 PAGES. 4
"A COMPARISON OF C~DMIUM ~ND ZINC ~CCU/itULATION BY FOUR
CULTIVARS OF B~RLEY GROWN IN SLUDGE-~""ENDED SO,ILS"
VOL. 11 (3) s409-411-
CHANG A. C. ET ~L.
JOURNAL OF tNVIRONMENT~L QUf:\LITY
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNf:\L ~RTICLE
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
FILEI 2021782
TITLE/SUBJECT.
~UTHORI
ORG~NIZATIONI
~DDRESSEE.
ORG~NI ZATIC~h
DOCUMENT TYPE.
~RI 100049 DATEs 00/00/82
NCADMIUN AND LEAD CONTENT OF VEGET~BLE CROPS
WITH A HISTORY OF SEW~GE SLUDGE ~PPLICATION"
(SERIES B) 4:231-237
CHIJIIIBL~!l. C. G. 1. ET ~L.
ENVI RO~NTAL IJOLLUT I ON
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURN~L ARTICLE
P~GES. 7
GROWN ON LAND
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~N~CONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/87 ~DMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX Page: 4=
.=~================~=.-===-=--======:~----------=====------~------------------
[FILE I 2021702 NGMBEil-~~~050 ------~~~~: 00/ii7~~- -------~~~~~:-;~--
TITLE/SUBJECT: "ELEMENT CONCENTRATIONS TOXIC TO PLANTS1. ANIMALS,. AND MAN,"---
AN APPRAISAL OF THE TOXICITY HAZARD TO ~LANTS ANIMALS AND
MEAN FROM NATURAL AND MANMADE ELEMENT CONCENTRATIONS OF
NVIRONMENTAL CONCERN. BULLETIN 1466
GOUGH LARRY P., ET AL.
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
~UTHOR:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
ADDRESSEEs
ORG~NIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEI 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT I
~UTHORI
ORG~NIZ~TIONI
~DDRESSEEI
ORG~NIZATIONI
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER I 100051 DATE: 00/00/74 PAGES: 4
"PLANT UPTAKE OF CADMIUM AS INFLUENCED BY CATION EXCHANGE
CAPACITY, ORGANIC M~TTER, ZINC, AND SOIL TEMPERATURE"
VOL. 3(2} :180-183.
H~GHIRI F.
JOURNAL'OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
NOT I ND.I CATED
NOT INDIC~TED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ~RTICLE
--------------------------------------------------------------~--------~~~~~~-
FILEI 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT I
~UTHORI
ORG~NIZ~TIONI
~DDRESSEEI
ORG~NIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER 1 1000~2 D~TEI 0~/00/82
"DIFFERENTIAL ACCUMULATIONS OF CADMIUM AND ZINC BY
HYBRIDS GROWN ON SOIL AMENDED WITH SEWAGE SLUDGE"
VOL. 741469-474
HINESLY,. T.D.,. ET ~L.
~GRONOMY JOURNAL
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
PAGES: 6
CORN
--------------------------------------------------~---------------------~-~~=~
FILEI 2021702
. TITLE/SUBJECT I
~UTHORI
ORG~NIZATION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZ~TIONI
DOCUMENT TYPE:
D~TEI 00/00/73 P~GES: 5
FOOD CROPS ~S INFLUENCED BY VARIOUS
VOL. 417-1~.
NUMBER 1 1000~3
"CADMIUM UPTAKE BY EIGHT
SOIL LEVELS OF CADIltIUIIt".
JOHN M~TT K.
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~-.
FILEI 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT I
~UTHORI
ORG~NIZATIONI
ADDRESSEE 1
ORG~NIZATIONI
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER 1 1000~4 D~TE:
"CADIltIUM CONTAIltINATION OF SOIL AND
VOL. 6(6) I ~~~-~~7.
JOHN M~TT K. ET AL.
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSP~PER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
06/00/72 PAGES: 3
ITS UPTAKE BY OATS"--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~~--
FILEI 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT I
~UTHORI
ORG~NIZATIONI
~DDRESSEEI
ORG~NIZATIONI
DOCUMENT TYPEI
NUMBER. 1000~~ DATE. 11/00/76 PAGES, 1~
-THE UPT~KE OF NATIVE AND APPLIED LEAD BY ALFALFA AND
BROJWtEGR~SS FROM SOIL". VOL. :56:48~-494.
K~R~IIt~NOS R.E. ET AL.
CAN~DIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~NACONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/87 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX Pc1\ge: I<
-=-------===--------==-=.==..===-====~====.-=~=.============~===========----
FILE7-202170Z------- ~Rz 100056 DATEI 00/00/84 PAGES~-i2=
TITLE/SUBJECT I "CELLULOLYTIC ~CTIVITY AND ROOT BIOMASS PRODUr.TION IN SOME 'I
METAL-CONT~MIN~TED SOILS". (SERIES A) VOL. 33:63-74.
AUTHORz KHAN D.H. £T AL.
ORG~NIZATION: ENVI~ONMENr~L POLLUTION
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPEz NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ~RTICLE
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEz 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT I
AUTHORz
ORGANIZATION.
~DDRESSEEI
ORGANIZATIONz
DOCUMENT TYPE I
NlJIItBER: 1000~7
"UPTAKE OF LEAD BY ALF~LFA
11S(6): 455-460.
LAGERWERFFL J.V., ET AL.
SOIL. SCIENt,;E
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDIC~TED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
DATE: 00/00/73 PAGES: 6
AND CORN FROM SOIL AND ~IR"--VOL.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------~
FILE: 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
~DDRESSEEz
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER I 1000~8 DATE. 00/00/65 PAGES: 11
"ARSENIC". IN: H.D. CHAPMAN~ DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA FOR PLANTS
AND SOILS. PUBL.ISHED PRIVAT~LY BY ~UTHOR AT 830 S.
UNIVERSITY DR. RIVERSIDE, CA 92~07. PAGES 13-23
LIEBIGb BEORGE F. JR.
NOT IN IC~TED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
/'ItISCEL.l.ANEOUS
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEs 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATIONs
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPEs
NUilBERI 1000~9 DATE: 00/00/67 PAGES I 22
"CHAPTER 2 - THE AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT" AND "CHAPTER 3 -
BIOTIC RESPONSES TO THE AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT" PAGES 11-~0 IN:
"BIOL.OGICAL. ASSOCIATED PROBLEMS IN FRESHWATER ENVIRONMENTS
MACXENTHUN KENNETH M. ET AL.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE'INTERIOR
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MISCELLANEOUS
-----------~------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR:
ORG~NIZATION:
ADDRESSEE I
ORGANIZATIONz
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBERs 100060 DATE: 08/00/76 PAGES I 10
"C~D""IlJJII IN DIFFERENT PLANT SPECIES AND ITS AVAILABILITY IN
SOILS AS INFLUENCED BY ORGANIC MATTER AND ADDITIONS OF LIME,
PL CdL AND Zn". VOL.. 56 <3> 1129-138.
/'It~CL.E~N,. A. J.
CANADIAN JOURNAL. OF SOIL. SCIENCE
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL. ARTICLE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEs 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATIONs
DOCUMENT TYPEs
NUMBER. 100061 DATEs 00/00/79 PAGESz 4
-THE EFFECT OF SOIL.-ADDED CADMIUM ON SEVERAL. PLANT SPECIES"-
VOL. 8(2)s 229-232.
""ILES1. L.J.
JOURN~L OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ~RTICL.E
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONT~N~ OPER~8LE UNIT
l0/~:~~~_-------- -- ~DMINISTR~TIVE RECORD INDEX P~ge: :
-==--------------=--====----=------------=--------------------------------~---
:ILE: 2021702 NUMBER; 100062------ --CATE;-00/00/77---------PAGES~-2---
TITLE/SU8JECT: "INTERACTIONS OF LEAD AND CADMIUM ON METAL UPTAKE AND
GROWTH OF CORN PLANTS" --VOL. 6 ( 1): 18-20.
AUTHOR: MILLER JOSEPH E. ET AL.
ORGANIZATION: JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
nLE. 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
~DDRESSEE:
ORGAN I ZAT ION:
DOCUMENT TY PE .
NUMBER: 100063 D~TEI 00/00/78 PAGES: 7
"YIELD AND METAL COMPOSITION OF LETTUCE AND WHEAT GROWN ON
SOILS AMENDED WITH SEWAGE SLUDGE ENRICHED WITH CAOMIUM,
COPPER, NICKEL. AND ZINC"--vOL. 7(2): 16~-171.
MITCHE~L G.A. ET AL.
JOURNAL OF ENV~RONMENTAL QUALITY
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
---------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~
FILE: 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT.
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZ~TION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TY PE :
NUMBER. 100063A D~TE. 00/00/75 PAGES, 5
"RESPONSE OF CORN TO ZINC ~ND CHROMIUM IN MUNICIPAL WASTES
APPLIED TO SOIL"--VOL. 4(2): 170-174.
MORTVEDT J.J. ET A~.
JOURNAL OF ENV1RONMENTAL QUALITY
NOT IN[)IC~TED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
---------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~
FILE. 20217'02
T ITLElSUB.1ECT .
~UTHOR.
~ORGANIZATION.
, ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TY PE :
NUMBER. 100064
"EFFECT OF CHELATING AGENTS
LEAD TRANSPORT"--VOL. 8(~).
PATEL,. P.M.L ET AL.
COMMUN. IN ~OIL SCIENCE AND
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
DATE. 00/00/77
ON PHYTOTOXICITY
133-740.
PL~NT AN~LYSIS
PAGES: 8
OF LEAD AND
-------------------------------------------------------------------------~-~~=
FILE: 2021702
T I TLE/SUB.1ECT I
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATIONI
ADDRESSEE.
ORG~NIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE I
NUMBER. 10006~ DATE: 00/00/82 P~GESs 7
"CONCENTR~TIONS OF SIX TR~CE METALS IN SOME M~JOR MINNESOTA
SOIL SERIES"--VOL. 11(3). 416-422.
PIERCE F.J. ET AL.
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENT~L QUALITY
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 2021702
T I TLE/SUB.1ECT .
~UTHOR.
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEEs
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TY PE .
NUMBER. 100066 D~TE. 00/00/00 PAGES. 33
"CHAPTER ~ - ~VAILABILITY OF TRACE ELEMENTS IN THE SOIL"
PART I. IN. "FUNDAMENTAL ASPECTS OF POLLUTION CONTROL AND
AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE" R.J. WAKEMAN. EDITOR.
PURVES D.
NOT INbICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MISCELLANEOUS
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------~
-------
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/87 ADMINIStRATIVE RECORD INDEX Page: ::
===============================~.===~.=~===2S~===============================
FILEs 2021702 NUMBER: 100067 DATE. 00/00/84 PAGES: 15
TITLE/SUBJECT. "ELEMENT CONCENTRATIONS IN SOILS AND OTHER SURFICIAL
MATERIALS OF THE CONTERMINOUS UNITED STATES". PAPER 1270.
AN ACCOUNT OF THE CONCENTRATIONS OF 50 CHEMICAL ELEMENTS IN
SAMPLES OF SOILS AND OTHER REGOLITHS.
SHACKLETTE HANSFORD. ET AL.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGAN I ZAT I ON.
DOCUMENT TYPE:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR:
ORGANI ZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUJI1BE R . 100068 DATE: 02/00/81 PAGES: 10
"UPTAKE OF CADMIUJI1 BY LETTUCE CLactuca sativa) AS INFLUENCED
BY ITS ADDITION TO A SOIL AS INORGANIC FORMS OR IN SEWAGE
SLUDGE". VOL. 61:19-28.
SINGH S. SHAH
CANADiAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 20;21702
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATIONs
DOCUJWlENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100068A DATEs 00/00/72 PAGES. 3
"ARSENIC PHYTOTOXICITY ON A PLAINFIELD SAND AS AFFECTED BY
FERRIC SULFATE OF ALUMINUM SULFATE"--VOL. 1(3): 301-303.
STEEVENS D.R. ET AL.
JOURNAL OF ENViRONMENTAL QUALITY
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEs 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECTs
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATIONs
DOCUJI1ENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100069 DATE. 00/00/81 PAGES. 14
"INFLUENCE OF LEAD, CADMIUM, AND NICKEL ON THE GROWTH OF
MEDICAGO SATIVA CL.)"--VOL. 60: 223-236.
TAYLOR~ R.W.t ET AL.
PLANT RND SOlL
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHORs
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEEs
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUJI1ENT TYPEs
DATEs 00/00/72 PAGES. 17
MACRO- AND MICRONUTRIENT NUTRITION
CO~STAL PLAIN SOILS"--VOL. 36,
AL.
NUJWlBER: 100070
"RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN
OF SLASH PINE ON THREE
331-347.
VAN LEARb DAVID H., ET
PLANT AN SOIL
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
-----------------------------------~----------~-------------------------------
FILE: 2021702
TITLE/SUB.1ECT.
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATIONa
ADDRESSEEs
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUJI1ENT TYPE.
NUMBERs 100070A DATE, 08/00/77 PAGES: ~
"OCCURRENCE AND DISTRIBUTION OF ARSENIC IN SOILS AND
PLANTS"--VOL. 19, 67-71.
WALSH LEO M. ET AL.
ENVIRONJI1ENTAL'HEALTH PERSPECTIVES
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
---------------------------------------------------~--------------------------
-------
~N~CON~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONT~N~ OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/87 ADMINISTR~TIVE RECORD INDEX Page: ~~
~======================-==-=~--============-------8===------------------------
~ILE. 2021702 NUMBER. 100071 -DATE~-00/00/20---------PAGES~-10~
TITLE/SUBJECT: "ROOT DEVELOPMENT IN THE GRASSLAND FORMATION - CORRELATION
OF THE ROOT SYSTEMS OF NATIVE VEGETATION AND CROP PLANTS".
PU9LICATION NUMBER 292.
WEAVER JOHN E.
CARNEG~E INSTITUTION OF WASHINGTON
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MISCELLANEOUS
AUTHOR:
ORG~N I ZAT ION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORG~NIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE I
---------------------------------------------------------------------------~--
FILE. 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHORI
ORG~NIZ~TION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORGAN I Z~TIONI
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100072 DATE. 00/00/~8 PAGES: 24
"SUMM~RY AND INTERPRETATION OF UNDERGROUND DEVELO~MENT
IN NATURAL GRASSL~ND COMMUNITIES"--VOL 28(1) 1 ~5-78.
WE~VER J. E.
ECOLOG1C~L MONOGRAPHS
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDIC~TED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~-
FILEI 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT I
~UTHOR :
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATIONI
DOCUMENT TYPE I
NUMBER. 100073 DATE I 08/12/49 PAGES: 2
"QUANTITATIVE STUDY OF ROOT SYSTEMS IN DIFFERENT SOIL TYPES"
--VOL 110: 164-16:5.
WEAVER .I.E., ET ~L.
SCIENCE
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
------------------------~-----------------------------------------~-~=
FILEI 2021702
T1 TLE/SUBJECT I
~ .:::\UTHOR 1
ORGANIZ.:::\TIONI
ADDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZATIONI
DOCUMENT TY PE :
NUMBER I 100074 DATE I 00/00/84 PAGES 1 10
IIUPT~KE OF ARSENIC ~ND MERCURY FROM SOIL. BY B£RMUDAGRASS
CYNODON DACTYLON"--VOL. 33:133-142.
WEAVER R.W. ET AL. .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLL.UTION
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ~RTICLE
-------~------------------------------------------------------------------~-~~
FILEI 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT I
.:::\UTHOR :
ORGANIZATIONI
.:::\DDRESSEE:
ORG.:::\NIZATIONI
DOCUMENT TYPE I
NUMBER I 10007~ DATE I 00/00/80 PAGES. 6
"ZINC CADMIUM .:::\ND MANG~NESE UPTAKE BY SOYBEAN FROM TWO
ZINC-'~ND CADMIUM-AMENDED COASTAL PLAIN SOILS"--VOL.. 44:
308-313.
WHITE~ M.C.L ET ~L.
SOIL. ~CIENC~ SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ~RTICLE
----------------------------------------------------------------------------~~
FILE. 2021702
T ITLE/SU8.1ECT I
.:::\UTHOR.
ORG~NI ZATION I
~DDRESSEEI
DORG~N I Z.:::\T I ON.
OCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 100076 DATE I 00/00/73 P~GESI 6
-THE CHEMISTRY AND PHYTOTOXICITY OF ~RSENIC IN SOILS: II.
EFFECTS OF TIME AND PHOSPHORUS" VOL. 3712:54-2:59.
WOOLSON\ E.~., ET AL.
SOIL SC1. SOC. AMER. PROC.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
----------------------------------------------------------------------------~~
-------
AN~CONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK'r MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/87 ADMINIS R~TIVE RECORD INDEX Page: It
==================.a==...s.=._.a===.==a.==..=-~======.========--=============
FILE. 2021702 tUGlERI 100077 DATE. 07/00/76 PAGES. ~4~
TITLE/SUBJECTI "QUALITY CRITERIA FOR WATER" (PB-263 943) ~
AUTHJRI NOT INDI~TED ,
ORGANIZATION. USEP~
ADDRESSEE. NOT INDIC~TED
ORGANIZATIONI NOT INDI~TED
DOCUMENT TYPE I REPORT/STUDY
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEI Z021702
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATIONI
ADDRESSEE I
ORGAN I ZATIONI
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER I 100078 DATE: 08/00/76 PAGES. 162
"AIR QUALITY DATA FOR METALS 1970 THROUGH 1974 FROM THE
NATIOPA. ~IR SURVEILLANCE NETWOR~S" (PB-260 90~)
USEPA CONTRACT NO. 600/4-76-041, RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK,
NORTH ~ROLINA.
e~~~~~'OF~r~~DO~.RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
NOT INDI~TED
NOT INDI~TED
REPORT/STUDY
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT I
AUTHOR I
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGAN I ZATIONI
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER I 100079 DATE. 11/00/77
"MULTIMEDI~ ENVIRONMENTAL GOALS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSMENL. VOLUME II. MEG CHARTS AND 8AC~GROUND
INFORMATIUN" (PB 276 920)
NOT INDIC~TED ~
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NORTH CAROLINA
NOT I ND I ~TED
INDUSTRIAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LAS
REPORT /STUDY
PAGES. 4ae
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 2021702
TITLE/SUB.JECTI
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATIONI
ADDRESSEE I
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 100080 DATE. 12/00/77 PAGES. 30S
"AIR QUALITY CRITERIA FOR LEAD" (EPA-600/8-77-017) --THIS
DOCUMENT SUMMARIZES CURRENT 'KNOWLEDGE ABOUT THE
RELATIONSHIPS OF AIRBORNE LEAD TO MAN AND HIS ENVIRON~ENT.
AKLAND GERALD G. ET AL.
USEPA,.:OFFICE OF ~ESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
NOT INVICATED
NOT I ND I CAT ED
REPORT/STUDY
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT I
AUTHOR I
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATIONI
DOCUMENT TYPE I
NlJIItBERI 100081 DATE. 12/00/79 PAGES. 366
"INDUSTRIAL SOURCE COMPLEX (ISC) DISPERSION ,.,ODEL USER'S
GUIDE. VOLUME I" (EPA-4~0/4-79-030)
BOWERS~_J.F.~ ET AL.
H. E. Cl
-------
~NACOND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONT~N~ OPER~BLE UNIT
10/01/87 ~DMINISTR~TIVE RECORD INDEX P~ge: =-
======================~=====================-c----========------------------==
FILE: 2021702 NUMBER I 100083 DATE~-10/00/80---------PAGES~-1~-
TITLE/SUBJECT. "AMBIENT WATER QU~LITY CRITERIA FOR COPPER"
(EPA-440/~-a0-036) OFFICE OF WATER REGUL~TIONS AND STANDARC~
CORITERIA AND STANDARDS DIVISION. WASHINGTON, D.C.
N T INDICATED
USEPA
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 20i:: 1702
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR .
ORGANIZATION.
~DDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 100084 DATE I 10/00/80
"AMBIENT WATER QUALITY CRITERIA FOR ARSENIC"
(EP~-440/S-80-021) OFFICE OF WATER REGULATION AND
CRITERIA ~ND.STANDARDS DIVISION. WASHINGTON, D.C.
NOT INDICATED
USEPA
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDIC~TED
REPORT/STUDY
P~GES: 21:.:'
STANDARDS
--------------------------------------------------------------------~---~~=~--
FILE. 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 10008~ DATE. 10/00/80
"AMBIENT WATER QUALITY CRITERIA FOR LEAD"
CEPA-440/~-80-0~7) OFFICE OF WATER REGUL~TIONS AND
CRITERIA AND STANDARDS DIVISION. W~SHINGTON, D.C.
NOT INDICATED
USEPA
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
PAGES: 16e
STANDARDS
------------------------------------------------------------------------~-~==-
FILE. 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZ~TION.
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER. 100086 DATE. 10/00/80
"AMBIENT WATER QUALITY CRITERIA FOR ZINC"
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONT~N~ OPER~BLE UNIT
1121/1211/87 ~DMINIS'rR~TIVE RECORD INDEX Page: 0::
-.=--=-=--~==============.=====.s-..~~-~.-=_.=========================----- ~
FILE~ 2021702 NUMBER I 1012112189 D~TE. 07/121121/84 P~GEs:-i;=
TITLE/SUBJECT. "CONTR~CT L~BORATORY PROGR~M -STATEMENT OF WORK
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONT~N~ OPER~BLE UNIT
L0/01/87 ~DMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX Page: ::
==================:====--:-=----========-------:----=---a=--=----=-----------
:ILEI 2021702 NUMBER 1-100095 ----OATE;-04/00/85-- ---- -PAGES~-8~--
TITLE/SUBJECT. "GUIDANCE ON FEASIBILITY STUDIES UNDER CERCLA"--A GUIDANCE
DOCUMENT INTENDED TO PROVIDE A MORE DETAILED STRUCTURE FOR
IDENTIFYING EVALUATING AND SELECTING REMEDIAL ACTION
ALTERNATIVES UNDER CERCLA AND THE N~TIONAL CONTINGENCY PLAN.
NOT INDICATED
USEPA, OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
AUTHOR:
ORG~N I ZAT ION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORG~NI ZAT I ON:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
nLEI 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT I
~UTHORI
ORG~N I Z~T I ON I
~DDRESSEEI
ORG~NIZATIONI
DOCUMENT TY PE I
NUMBER I 100097 DATE I 06/00/S~ PAGES: 20~
"UPD~TED MUTAGENICITY AND CARCINOGENICITY ASSESSMENT OF
CADMIUM - FINAL REPORT - ~DDENDUM TO THE HEALTH ASSESSMENT
DOCUMENT FOR CADMIUM (MAV 1981) EPA/600/S-S1/02J"
(EPA-600/8-8J-025F)
ALBERT ROY E. (M.D.)
USEPA,.'OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
--------------------------~--------------------------------------------~~-~~~-
FILEI 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT I
.. ~UTHOR I
CRGANI Z~T I ON I
~DDRESSEEI
ORG~NI ZAT IONI
DOCUMENT TV PE I
NUMBER I 100098 DATE I 09/30/8~ PAGES. 14
"LEAD - HEALTH ADVISORY"--INFORMATION ON HEALTH EFFECTS
ANALVTICAL METHODOLOGY AND TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY THAT WOULD
BE USEFUL IN DEALING WITH CONTAMINATION OF DRINKING WATER.
NOT INDICATED
USEPA,. OFFICE OF DRINKING WATER
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
----------------------------------------------------------------------------~~
FILEI 2021702
~ I TLE/SUBJECT I
AUTHOR I
ORGANIZATIONs
~DDRESSEE :
ORGAN I ZAT I ON:
DOCUMENT TYPE I
NUMBERs 100099 DATE I 10/01/8~ PAGES. 183
"DRAFT SUPERFUND PUBLIC HEALTH EVALUATION MANUAL"--THIS
MANUAL ESTABLISHES A FRAMEWORK FOR ANALVZING PUBLIC HEALTH
RISKS ~T SUPERFUND SITES AND FOR DEVELOPING GOALS FOR
REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES THAT ARE BASED ON ARAR'S OF OTHER
LAWS~ WHERE AVAILABLE, OR RISK ANALYSIS WHERE NOT AVAILABLE.
NOT !NDICATED
CLEMENT & ASSOCIATES, INC.
NOT INDICATED
USE PAL OFFICE OF EMERGENCY AND REMEDIAL RESPONSE
REPORI/STUDY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------~-~
FILEI 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT I
AUTHOR I
ORGANIZ~TIONI
~DDRESSEEI
ORGANIZATIONI
DOCUMENT TYPE I
NUMBER I 100100 DATE I 11/13/8~ PAGES I 87
"NATIONAL PRIMARY DRINKING WATER REGULATIONS; SYNTHETIC
ORGANIC CHEMICALS, INORGANIC CHEMICALS, AND MICROORGANISMS;
PROPOSED RULE (40 CFR PART 141)"
NOT INDICATED
FEDERAL REGISTER
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEI 2021702 NUMBER I 100101 DATE I 0~/00/a7 PAGESz 434
TITLE/SUBJECT I "REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION OF SOILS!.. VEGETATION AND LIVESTOCK
FOR EAST HELENA SITE (ASARCO) E~ST HELENA, MONTANA - EPA
WORK ASS1GNMENT NUMBER 68-SLJ0.0" CONTRACT NO. 68-01-7251-
AUTHOR I NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATIONI CH~M HILL
~DDRESSEE. NOT INDICATED
DORGANIZATIONI NOT I~DICATED
OCUMENT TYPE. REPORT/STUDV
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
RILL CREEK MONT~N~ OPER~BLE- UNIT
10/1211/81 ~DMINISTR~TIVE RECORD INDEX . P~ge:
~_s_================Z8=-==a~~a.s===2====~..~=a=========~=========s==========
FILE. 20;;1702 NtJIIBERI 1001121~ DATE I 08/19/81 P~GES: 1
TITLE/SUBJECT. TR~NS"ITTAL OF 4~ OF THE 123 MILL CREEK RI/FS REFERENCES
TH~T WERE REnUESTED, ~ND ~N ATTACHED LIST SHOWING THE
DISPOSITION OF EACH REFERENCE LISTED.
GLA~S, GREGORY
TETR~ TECH~ INC.
~ISHOP MI~E
USEP~-VIII, MONT~NA OFFICE
LETTER
AUTHOR.
ORGAN I ZATION:
ADDRESSEE.
ORGAN I Z~TION:
DOCUMENT TYPE I
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGAN I ZATION I
DOCU"'ENT TYPE I
NlJIIBER: 100103 DATE: 00/00/121121 PAGES, a0
~ CODIN6 SYSTEM AND A LIST INDICATING THE DISPOSITION OF
REFERENCES WHICH WERE REQUESTED FROM TETR~ TECH FOR THE
ADJIIIN]STR~TIVE RECORD.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDI~TED
NOT ]NDI~TED
NOT INDI~TED
11'1 SCELLANEOUS
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE I 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECTI
~UTHOR.
ORGAN I ZATIONI
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
~RI 1121011214 DATE I 1212/00/12 PAGES. Sg
M~NACCNDA SETTLING POND SYSTE'" ANACONDA MONTANA - A .
PRELIJIfiNARY REPORT ON EXISTING CONDITIONS"--THE OBJECTIVE OF
THE I~STI6ATION WAS TO DETERMINE THE FLOW, VOLUME, AND
nU~LITY OF WATERS IN THE POND SYSTEM AREA.
NOT INDICATED .
~N~A MINERALS COMPANY (AMC)
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDI~TED
REPORT/STUDY
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 2021102
TITLE/SUBJECT,
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGAN I ZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE I
f'UfBER. 10010~ DATE I 1121/18/84 PAGES, 16
RESULTS FROJII A SEPTEMBER ~ 6 AND 1 1984 CURSORY SOIL
SURVEY OF THE AREA AROUND ANACONDAL MONTANA ALONG WITH A
DR~FT MAP OF THE SOIL SAMPLING LOCHTIONS.
RIC~RDS, BART
~NACONDA "INERALS COMPANY CAMC)
WINDORSKI1.. J. C.
NOT INDICRTED
REPO~T /STUDY .
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 2021102
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
ORGAN I ZATIONI
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANI ZATION,
DOCUMENT TYPE I
------------------
FILE. 2021782
TITLE/SUBJECT I
AUTKJRI
ORGANI Z~TION,
ADDRESSEE I
ORGANI ZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE,
f'UfBER. 100106 DATE I 1214/16/86 PAGES, 152
MAN~ - MILL CREEK ENDANGERMENT ASSESS~ENT AIR QUALITY/
~TEOR. DATA--~ISC PRINTOUTS. WORKSHEETS, SPSS CORRELATIONS
DATABASE-
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MISCELLANEOUS
--------------------------------------------------
JiUGERI 10011217
.A~ - JOHNSON'S
(COMPUTER PR I NTOUTS)
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
fit I SCElLANEOUS
"'-
DATEI 1210/00/8~ PAGES: 2B~
CURVE METEOROLOGICAL DATA - 198~1I--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERA8LE UNIT
1~/01/a7 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX Page: :
...=-===============a===---------======---=a---------------------------------
~FILEt 2021702 NUM8ER~-10010a --- DATE~-00/00/00---------~AGES~-~~~
,TITLE/SUBJECT: "ANACONDA - AIR QUALITY SAMPLER DATA 1983-1986"--(COMPUTER
PRINTOUTS)
AUTHOR: NOT tNDICATED
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: MISCELLANEOUS
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECTs
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEEs
ORGAN I ZAT I ON s
DOCUMENT TY PE :
NUMBERs 100109 DATE: 00/00/73 PAGES: 3
"THE INFLUENCE OF SOIL ARSENIC ON THE GROWTH OF LOWBUSH
8LUEBERRY" VOL. 2(3) :33~-337.
ANASTASIA FRANK 8. ET AL.
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONM£NTAL nUALITY
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------~-~--
FILE: 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHORs
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE I
ORGANIZATIONs
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100110 DATE: 00/00/79 PAGES: 16
"ENVIRONMENTAL LEAD AND CHILDREN: THE OMAHA STUDY"--VOL.5:
a~~-a70.
ANGLE CAROL R. ET AL.
JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
----------------------------------------~------------------------------~--~~~-
FILEI 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECTs
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
~ ADDRESSEE:
~ ORGAN I ZAT I ON I
DOCUMENT TY PE .
NUMBER: 100111 DATE I 00/00/67E
"THE DETERMINATION AND DISTRIBUTION OF TOXIC
ARSENIC IN A SILT LOAM"--VOL. 1~1 121-124.
ARNOTT, JAMES T., ET AL.
WEEDS
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
PAGES: 4
LEVELS OF
---------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~
FILEI 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEEs
ORGANIZATIONs
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER: 100112 DATE: 00/00/77 PAGES: 13
"A NATIONWIDE SURVEY OF HEAVY METAL ABSORPTION IN CHILDREN
LIVING NEAR PRIMARY COPPER, LEAD, AND ZINC SMELTERS"--VOL.
106 (4) s 2e.1-273.
BAKER EDWARD L. JR. ET AL.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEI 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECTs
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATIONs
ADDRESSEEs
ORGAN I ZATION:
DOCUMENT TY PE .
NUMBERs 100113 DATE. 04/00/8~ PAGES: 96
"HISTORICAL WATER-QUALITY DATA FOR THE CLARK FORK (RIVER)
AND THE MOUTHS OF SELECTED TRIBUTARIES, WESTERN MONTANA"--
OPEN-FILE REPORT as-le.a.
BROSTEN T.M. ET AL.
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/87 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX P~ge' .
============= ========-============================ =====================~_: I
FILE: 2021702 Pt.IeER: 100114 DATE: 00/00/81 PAGES I 1 i- I
TITLE/SUBJECT: 8TIE A~M LEAD STUDY--LEAD UPTAKE BY 1- TO 3-YEAR OLD 4~
CHILD~ LIVING IN THE VICINITY OF A SECONDARY LEAD SMELTER
IN ~RNHE"'1: THE NETHERLANDS". VOL. 25:441-448. -
BRt..NEKREE t BERT. 1. ET AL.
ENVIRCHEN AL'REStARCH
NOT INDICATED
"I)T INDICATED
M:WSPAPERI JOURNAL ART I CLE
AUTIiO R :
ORGAN I ZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANI ZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
FILE: 20::170::
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTIlJR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANI ZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE.
N.JImER: 100115 DATE: 00/00/84 PAGES: 4B
8THE POTENTIAL FOR HEAVY METAL EXPOSURE FROM URBAN GARDENS
AND SOILS8. IN: J.R. PREER EDITOR "PROCEEDINGS OF A
SyJltPOSILJIIt ON HEAVY METALS iN URBAN' GARDENS" PAGES 37-64.
CHANEY RUFUS L. ET Ale
UNIVERSITY OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMSIA EXTENSION SERVICE
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
Jill SC£LLAtEOUS
--------------------
------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGAN IZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE I
~R: 100116
8~NEHT AND PERSISTENCE
YOL. 15:299-304.
DIO
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREE~ MONT~N~ OPER~BLE UNIT
10/01/87 ~DMINISTR~TIVE RECORD INDEX P~ge: ~
=======================------==_s==s=a==--------------==-------------------~-
FILE: 2021702 NUMBER;-100120 ----DATE~-04/00/83---------PAGES~-~~~
TITLE/SUBJECT: "SUMMIT AND DEER LODGE VALLEYS LONG-TERM ENVIRONMENTAL
REHABILITATION STUDY- BUTTE-ANACONDA, MONTANA - VOLUME
VIII - OPPORTUNITY PONDS"
NOT INDICATED
HYDROMETRICS
WINDORSKI JIM
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC)
REPORT/STUDY
AUTHOR:
ORG~NI ZAT ION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEI 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT I
~UTHOR I
ORGANIZATIONI
~DDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER I 100121 DATE I 00/00/83
"TUMORIGENICITY OF ARSENIC TRIOXIDE TO THE LUNG
GOLDEN HAMSTERS BY INTERMITTENT INSTALLATIONS".
VOL. 21: 1 41 - 1 47.
ISHINISHI~ NOBURU., ET AI...
CANCER LETTERS
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURN~L ARTICLE
P~GES: 7
IN SYRIAN
-----------------------------------------------------------------------~--~~~-
FILEI 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT I
AUTHOR I
ORG~NI ZATION:
~DDRESSEEI
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER: 100122 D~TEI 07/21/86 P~GESI 2
CONTACT REPORT--BILL JENKINS OF THE PEGASUS GOLD MINING CO,
AND PAM DERKEY (?) OF MT. BON WERE CONTACTED REGARDING THE
SUBJECT OF THE GERMAN GULCH.
JENKINS" BILl..
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDIC~TED
REPORT/STUDY
---------------------------------------------------------------~-~~~~
P~GESr 21
FILE. 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT.
~ ~UTHOR:
ORG~NIZ~TIONI
ADDRESSEE.
ORG~NIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100123 DATE: 00/00/84
"TRACE ELFMENTS IN SOILS AND PLAN~S"
KABATA-PENDIAS ALINA (PH.D. )bET AL.
CRC PRESSL BOCA RATON, FLORI A
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
----------------------------------------------------------------------------~~
FILE. 2021702
T ITLE/SU8.1ECT I
~UTHOR I
ORG~NIZ~TION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORG~NIZATIONI
DOCUMENT TYPE I
NUMBER. 100124 DATE. 00/00/84 PAGES. 47
"HEALTH IMPLIC~TIONS OF 2~3\7~8-TETRACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
(TCDD> CONTAMIN~TION OF R~SLD~NTIAL SOIL"--VOL. 14. 47-93.
KIMBROUGH RENATE D. ET AL.
JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT~L HEALTH
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURN~L ARTICLE
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------~
FILE. 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT.
~UTHORI
ORG~NIZATIONI
ADDRESSEE.
ORG~NIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 10012~ DATE I 10/00/62 PAGES. 3~
IIPRELIMIN~RY REPORT ON THE GEOLOGY AND GROUND-WATER'
RESOURCES OF THE SOUTHERN PART OF THE DEER LODGE VALLEY,
"'ONT~NA". BULLETIN 31.
KONIZESKI,. R.L.~ ET AI...
MONT~N~ BuREAU uF MINES AND GEOLOGY
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDIC~TED
REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONT~N~ OPER~BLE UNIT
10/01/81 ~DMINISTR~TIVE RECORD INDEX p~ e'
-=--=================================================================---~-' I
FILE: 20;: 1 702 PUl8ER. 12121126 DATE I 00/00/68 P~GES:-:
TITLE/SUBJECT I -GEOLOGY AND GROUND-W~TER RESOURCES OF THE DEER LODGE'
V~LLEY1..."'ONT~N~". GEOLOGIC~L SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1862.~
~UTHORI KONIZE~I R.L., ET AL. ,
ORG~NIZATION: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
~DDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
ORG~NIZ~TION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: REPORT/STUDY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 22121702
TITLE/SUBJECT I
AUTHOR.
ORG~NI ZATION:
~DDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE.
~BER. 100121 DATE. 00/00/76 P~GESI I
-TR~CE ElFMENT MOVEMENT IN SOILS. INFLUENCE OF SOIL
PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES" VOL. 121 :350-35'3.
KORTEs. N. E. J.. ET ~L.
SOIL ~CIENCt SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL
NOT INDICATED.
NOT INDICATED
NEWSP~PER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
-----------------------------------------------~---------------------------
FILE. 20;:1702
TITLE/SUBJECT.
~UTHOR.
ORGAN I ZATION I
ADDRESSEE I
ORGANI ZATIONI.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NlJItBER. 10012e DATE I 00/00/00 P~GES: 7
841. ARSENIC". IN: W. N. ROM, EDITOR, "ENVIRONMENTAL AND
OCCUPATION~L MEDICINE"
LANDRIGAN PHILIP J.
LITTLE BROWN & BROWN CO., BOSTON
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
.. I SCELlANEOUS
---------------------------------------------------------------------------,
FILEI 20217~
TITLE/SU8JECTI
~UTHORI
ORGAN I ZAT ION I
ADDRESSEE I
ORGAN I ZATIONI
DOCUMENT TYPE I
NUMBER. 100129 DATE. 0~/00/16 P~GESI 1,
-SKIN CANCER AND WATER ~RSENIC IN LANE COUNTY, OREGON"--VOL.
37: 2~23-2S32.
"ORTON, WILLIAM (M.D. >, ET AL.
CANCER
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEI 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT.
~UTHOR I
ORGAN I ZATION I
~DDRESSEEI
ORGANI Z~TIONI
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NLMBERI 100130 DATE I 06/00/11 PAGES: 4
8CLIMATE OF EAST ANACOND~,. MONTANA". CLIMATOGR~PHY OF THE
UNITED STATES NO. 20. CLI~ATOLOGICAL SUMMARY - MEANS
RND EXTREMES FOR PERIOD 1'351-1'374.
NOT INDICATED
NATIONAL OCE~NIC ~ND ~TMOSPHERtC ~DMINISTR~TION (NO~~)
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEI 2021702
TITLE/SU8JECTI
AUTJ.«JRI
ORG~NI Z~TIC»"
~DDRESSEEI
ORGAN I ZATHI..
DOCUMENT TYPE I
DATE. 11/00/14 P~GES: 6
OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE TO ~RSENICALS"
~L.
~8ER. 100131
-RESPIRATORY CANCER ~ND
VOL. 2CJ 12~0-2~~.
OTT,. MARVIN GERALD.~ ET
RRC,... £NY I RON. HEAL J H
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ~RTICLE
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/87 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX P~ge: ~-
==.===============~=====-=-=----===~.~=--=-------=--=a._-=_~=8----------------
fILE: 2021702 NUMBER:-100132 -- --DATE~ 05/00/85 -----PAGES~-lS--
,ITLE/SUBJECT: "A METHOD FOR ESTIMATING MEAN AND LOW FLOWS OF STREAMS IN
NATIONAL FORESTS OF MONTANA". WATER RESOURCES INVESTIGATIONS
REPORT 85-4041-
PARRETT~ CHARLES.,. ET AL.
U.S. GEuLOGICAL SuRVEY
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
AUTHOR:
ORGAN I ZAT I ON:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 20~1702
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE:
ORGAN I ZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 100133 DATE. 0~/00/81 PAGES: 504
"PROCEDURES FOR HANDLING AND CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF SEDIMENT
AND WATER SAMPLES". .TECHNICAL REPORT EPA/CE-81-1.
PLUMB RUSSELL H. JR.
U.S. ~RMY ENGINEER WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT ST. VICKSBERG MS
NOT INDICATED
USEPA
REPORT/STUDY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~
FILE. 2021702 NUMBER. 100134 DATE. 00/00/84 PAGES: 6
TITLE/SUBJECT: "CHIL.DREN'S EXPOSURE TO SMELTER-ASSOCIATED L.EAD, MONTANA
-AND IDAHO". IN: PROCEEDINGS OF THE :lTH NATIONAL CONFERENCE
ON MANAGEMENT OF UNCONTROLLED WASTE SITES. NOV. 7-9. WASH~
INGTON D.C. PAGES 239-242.
SCHIL.LING~ R., ET AL.
NOT INDICHTED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TY PE :
-------------------------------------------------------------------------~-~~~
FILE: 202170~
TITLE/SUBJECTs
AUTHOR .:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TV PE .
NUMBER. 10013~ DATE. 00/00/72 PAGES: 75
"ELEMENTAL. COMPOSITION OF SURFICIAL MATERIALS IN THE
CONTERMINOUS UNITED STATES"--AN ACCOUNT TO THE AMOUNTS OF
CERTAIN CHEMICAL EL.EMENTS IN SAMPLES OF SOIL.S AND OTHER
REGOLITHS. USGS PROFESSIONAL. PAPER ~74-D.
SHACKL.ETTE HANSFORD. ET AL..
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~
FILEs 2021702
T I TL.E/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 100136 DATE: 08/00/77 PAGES: ~
"AIRBORNE ARSENIC EXPOSURE AND EXCRETION OF METHYLATED
ARSENIC COMPOUNDS"--VOL. 19: 89-93.
SMITHL T.J'L ET AL.
ENVIRuNMENT~L HEALTH PERSPECTIVES
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------~
FILE: 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECTr
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER. 1~0137 DATE. 00/00/83 PAGES: 17
"AN EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDY OF ARSENIC IN DRINKING WATER IN
MIL.LARD COUNTY,. UTAH" IN: W.H. L.EDERER AND R.J. FENSTERHEIM
EDITORSt "ARSENIC - INDUSTRIAL, BIOMEDICAL, ENVIRONMENTAL
PERSPEC IVES" PAGES 210-22~.
SOUTHWICK J.W. ET AL.
VAN NOSTRAND REiNHOLD COMPANY
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MISCELLANEOUS
-----------------------------------------------------------------------~----~~
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONT~N~ OPER~BLE UNIT
l0/01/67 ~D"'INISTR~TIVE RECORD INDEX P~ge: E,":
.=aa========..===2=__==_=====:s==============================================:
:'ILE.21212171212 NUMBER. 100138 D~TE. 0g/1S/62 PAGES: 1 -.
rITLE/SUBJECT. TRANSMITTAL OF EIGHT COPIES OF REPORT NO. 2~ PRELIMINARY ~
DESIGN 'OF THE FLUE DUST STORAGE FACILITY FO~ THE ANACONDA
SMELTER. (1 copy ATTACHED>
DEDYCKER PHILLIP
STEFFEN ~OBERTSON AND KIRSTEN
BROWN TOM
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC)
LETTER
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION:
)OCUMENT TYPE:
.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
~ILE. 2021702
. I TLE/SUBJECT .
~UTHORI
ORG~NIZATION.
ADDRESSEE I
ORG~NIZATIONI
)OCUMENT TYPE I
NUMBER. 10013g D~TE. 0g/00/82 PAGES: 127
"PRELIMINARY DESIGN OF THE FLUE DUST STORAGE FACILITY FOR
THE RECLAMATION OF THE ANACONDA REDUCTION WORKS (REPORT
01230/2)"
NOT INDICATED
STEFFEN ROBERTSON AND KIRSTEN
NOT INDICATED
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC)
REPORT/STUDY
.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
~ILE I 2021702
. I TLE/SU8JECT I
~UTHOR.
ORG~NIZATIONI
~DDRESSEEI
ORG~NIZATIONI
~OCUMENT TYPE I
NUMBER I 100140 DATE I 00/00/00 PAGES. 213
"SILVER SOW CREEK DATA (STILLER) - ANACONDA DATA SASE"--
COMPUTER PR!NTOUTS WITH MAPS AND T~BLES INDICATING
SAMPLING SITES.
NOT INDICATED
STILLER AND ASSOCIATES
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
,-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
'ILEI 2021702
'I TLE/SUBJECT I
AUTHOR I
ORGANIZ~TION.
ADDRESSEE I
ORGANIZATION.
IOCUMENT TY PE .
NUMBERl 100141 DATE I 07/00/07 PAGES. 23
"THE DETERMINATION OF ARSENIC AND OTHER SOLID CONSTITUENTS
OF SMELTER sMOKE~ WITH A STUDY OF THE EFFECTS OF HIGH STACKS
AND LARGE CONDEN~ING FLUES"--VOL. 2~(7) I 970-g~8.
HARKINS W.D. ET AL.
JOURNAL'OF THE AMERICAN CHEMIC~L SOCIETY
NOT INDICATED.
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
._----------~-----------------------------------------------------------------
'ILE. 2021702
'I TLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR I
ORGANIZATIONI
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION.
'OCUMENT TY PE I
NUMBER I 100142 DATE. 01/06/6g
"LEACHING OF ARSENIC FROM SOIL". VOL. 17.128-132.
TAMMEs, P.M.~ ET AL. .
NETHER~ANDS ~OURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
PAGES. ~
,-------------------------------~---------------------------------------------
'ILE I 2021702
. I TLE/SU8.JECT I
AUTHOR I
ORGANIZATIONI
ADDRESSEE I
ORGANIZATIONI
OCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER I 100143 DATE I 03/10/72
.SOIL CONTAMINATION AT ANACONDA'r MONTANA I HISTORY
INFLUENCE ON PL~NT GROWTH". MAS ER'S THESIS.
T~S~EY RONALD D.
UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
PAGES. 156
AND
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
1!~~1~~~___---- ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX Page: s~
=--_._---------=============.~====~==============.===----------====-----------
FILE. 2021702 NUMBER. 100144 DATE. 02/00/85----- PAGES:-9---
TITLE/SUBJECTs "MORTALITY AMONG A COHORT OF U.S. CADMIUM PRODUCTION'
WORKERS--AN UPDATE"--VOL. 71(2): 32S-333~
AUTHOR: THUN MICHEAL J. ET AL
ORGANIZATION: JOURNAL OF THE N~TIONAL'CANCER INSTITUTE (JNCI>
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED.
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FIL.E: 2021702
TITL.E/SUBJECTs
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEEs
ORGANIZATIONs
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER: 100145 DATE. 03/00/68
"PREVALENCE OF SKIN CANCER IN AN ENDEMIC AREA OF
ARSENICISM IN TAIWAN" VOL. 40(3) :453-463.
TSENG~ W.P.~ ET AL.
JOURN~L OF rHE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE (JNCI>
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICL.E
PAGES: 1 ~
CHRONIC
---------------------------------------------------------------------~---~~~~~'
FIL.E. 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 100145A DATE. 00/00/66
"GEOL.OGY OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE ANACONDA
DEER L.ODGE COUNTY~ MONTANA". USGS SURVEY 8ULLETIN
WANEK ALEXANDER~. ET AL.
U.S. bEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
PAGES s 1 7
QUADRANGLE
1222-8.
------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~~=-
FIL.E. 2021702 NUMBER. 100146 DATE. 00/00/73 PAGESz 6
TITL.E/SUBJECT. "THE CHEMISTRY AND PHYTOTOXICITY OF ARSENIC IN SOIL.S: I I.
EFFECTS OF ~IME AND PHOSPHOROUS" VOL. 37:a~4-2~9.
AUTHOR. WOOLSON E.A. ET AL.
ORGANIZATION. SOIL. sci. sac: AMER. PROC.
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION. NOT INDICATED
~~~:~~:~!_!!~:!_~:~:~~~:~::~~~~~:_~~!!::~--------------------------------------
FIL.E. 2021702 NUMBER. 100147 DATE: 00/00/83 PAGES: 46
TITLE/SUBJECT. "EMISSIONS, CYCLING AND EFFECTS OF ARSENIC IN SOIL.
ECOSYSTEMS' IN: "BIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENT EFFECTS OF
ARSENIC", FOWLER, EDITOR, PAGES ~1-139.
WOOLSON EDWIN A.
ELSEVIER SCIENCE PUBLISHERS
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MISCEL.L.ANEOUS
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------~-
FILE. 2021702
T I TL.E/SUB.1ECT s
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBERs 100148 DATEs 08/00/77 PAGES. ~
"THE SILVER VAL.LEY LEAD STUDY: THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN
CHIL.DHOOD 8LOOD L.EAD LEVELS AND ENVIRONMENTAL. EXPOSURE"--VOL
27(8). 763-767.
j~~~~~L ~~T~S~YAiR'palLe~ION CONTROL ASSOCIATION
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICL.E
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
ANACOND~ SMELTER SITE ,
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT j
~~~2;~~~===============."=~2~;~;;!~~r~~;=~;;~~~=;~~;~=================~:E:~=;.
FILE: 21212171212 -NUMBER: 10014g DATE: 1218/;::1/87 PAGES: 1 ..
TITLE/SUBJECT: TRANSMITTAL OF A COpy OF SKAAR ET AL. 198~ WHICH IS AN -
UPDATE TO SKAAR 198121--0NE OF THE TETRA TECH-CITED
REFERENCES REQUESTED.
GLASS, GREGORY
TETRA TECH,. INC.
BISHOP MI""E
USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
LETTER
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
--------------------------------------------------------------~--------------
FILE: 20~170~
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 112101S121 D~TE: 00/00/85 PAGES: 41
"MONTANA BIRD DISTRIBUTION"--MONOGRAPH NO.3. SUPPLEMENT
TO THE PROCEEDINGS VOLUME 44.
SKAAR DON. ET AL.
MONTANA ACAbEMY OF SCIENCES
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
-----------------~---------------------------------------~----------------~--
FILE: 20~1702
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 101211S1 D~TE: 00/00/84
"HISTOPATHOLOGY OF EARLY EFFECTS OF ORAL CADMIUM
KIDNEY" VOL. S4: 1S3-161.
AUGHEY E. ET AL
ENVIRONMENtAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
PAGES: ~
IN THE RAT
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT:
, .. AUTHOR:
ORGANIZ~TION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 112101S2 D~TE: 11/00/7S
"ABSORPTION OF LEAD FROM DUST AND SOIL" VOL. St:
BALTROP D. ET AL .
POSTGRAbUAT~ MEDICAL JOURN~L
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSP~PER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
P~GES: 4
801-604.
4
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 21212171212
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
P~GES: 3
NUMBER: 1001SS D~TE. 01/31/7S
"LEAD IN URBAN STREET DUST" VOL. 2~3: 343-34S.
DAY,. J.P., ETAL
NATuRE
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 202171212
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHORI
ORGANIZATIONa
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATIONI
DOCUMENT TYPE a
NUMBER: 1001~6 DATE. 00/00/77 P~GES: 4
"L£AD-IN-DUST IN CITY STREETS" VOL 7: g1-97.
AN ~SSESSMENT OF THE RISK FROM THE LE~D CONTENT OF STREET
DUST IS ATTEMPTED.
DUGGAN M. J.
THE SC}ENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 20217121~
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHO R :
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 1001~7 D~TE. 00/1210/84 PAGES: 5
"RELATION BETWEEN PICA AND BLOOD LEAD IN AREAS OF DIFFERING
LEAD EXPOSURE" VOL. S9: 40-44.
GALLACHER J.E.J. ET AL
ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
ANACONDA SMELT~R SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/87 ADMINIStRATIVE RECORD INDEX Page: =;
===..=================================~=============================-------_::
~FILE: 202170a NUMBER: 1001~8 DATE: 10/00/77 PAGES:-----
'TITLE/SUBJECT: "EPIDEMIOLOGY STUDIES-SELECTED NON-C~RCINOGENIC EFFECTS OF -
INDUSTRIAL EXPOSURE TO INORGANIC ARSENIC-FINAL REPORT"
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONT~N~ OPER~BLE UNIT
10/01/87 ~DMINIStR~TIVE RECORD INDEX Page:
~j~Ek~~B~}~~~:=:;::;;~~~i~~~:~0~~~~=;~::~:;=g~TE~:~0f~0~~i=~::::~:~~~~E~~=7=!4
URB~N CHILDREN" VOL. 10: 415-426.
~UTHORI LEPOW MARTHA L. . ET AL
ORG~NIZATION: ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR.
ORGANIZ~TIONI
~DDRESSEE:
ORGANIZ~TIONI
DOCUMENT TYPEI
NUMBER: 100165 DATEI 08/00/77
"QUANTITIES OF LEAD PRODUCING HEALTH EFFECTS IN
SOURCES ~ND BIOAVAILABILITY" VOL. 1~: 285-2~5.
MAHAFFEY KATHRYN R.
ENVIRONMENTAL HE~LTH PERSPECTIVES
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
PAGES: 11
HUMANS:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR .
ORGANIZ~TION.
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER. 100166 DATE: 00/00/78 PAGES: 37
"ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE TO LEAD" .1.0. NRIAGU EDITOR, THE
BIOGEOCHEMISTRY OF LEAD IN THE ENVIRONMENT, PART B.
BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS. PP. 1-36.
MAHAFFEY KATHRYN R.
ELSEVIER}NORTH-HOLL~ND BIOMEDIC~L PRESS
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MISCELLANEOUS
----------------------------------------------------------------------~------
FILEI 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT.
~UTHOR.
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUI'tENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 100167 DATE. 08/07/79 PAGES: 8
"EXPOSURE TO LEAD BY THE OR~L ~ND THE PULMONARY ROUTES OF
CHILDREN LIVING IN THE VICINITY OF ~ PRIMARY LEAD SMELTER"
VOL. 22: 81-94.
ROELS HARRY A. ET AL
ENVIRONMENTAL RESE~RCH
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ~RTICLE
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEr 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATIONs
~DDRESSEEs
ORG~NIZATION:
DOCUrwtENT TYPE.
NUI'tBER. 100168 DATE. 00/00/82 P~GE5: 6
"THE REL~TIONSHIP OF ENVIRONMENT~L LEAD TO BLOOD-LEAD LEVELS
IN CHILDREN" VOL. 27: 372-383. AN IN-DEPTH STUDY OF THE
DISTRIBUTION OF LE~D SOURCES IN THE RESIDENTI~L ENVIRONMENT
OF 377 CHILDREN IN NEW HAVEN, CONNETICUT.
STARK ALICE D. ET ~L .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESE~RCH
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021702
TITLE/SUB.1ECT.
~UTHOR,
ORGANIZATION,
~DDRESSEEI
ORGANIZATIONs
DOCUrwtENT TYPE.
NUI'tBERI 100169 ~ DATE. 02/00/83
MC~RCINOGENICITY OF CADMIUrwt CHLORIDE AEROSOLS IN
VOL. 70(2)1 367-371.
J~~~~~~AOFS~~~J~ATI6N~t CANCER INSTITUTE
-------
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/87 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX Page: 62
..==---=====================.======================-=-------------------------
:ILE: 20~1702 NUMBER: 100170 DATE: 01;00/80E--------PAGES~-S---
PTLE/SUBJECT: "AGE-SPECIFIC RISK FACTORS FOR LEAD ABSORPTION IN CHILDREN"
VOL. 35(1): 53-58.
AUTHOR: WALTER S.D. ET AL
ORGANIZATION: ARCHIVES OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGAN I ZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGAN I ZAT I ON:
DOCUMENT TY PE :
NUMBER: 100171 DATE: 12/26/6~ PAGES: 53
"DRAFT ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR RESIDENTIAL DUST AND SOIL
SAMPLES IN ANACONDA, MONTANA AND SURROUNDING COMMUNITIES"
(TDD R8-6~ 11-11 )
NOT INDICATED
ECOLOGY & ENVI RONMENT, INC. (E~E)
NOT INDICATED
USEPA
REPORT/STUDY
-------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~~~
FILE: 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR I
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE I
ORGAN I ZAT I ON:
DOCUMENT TYPE I
NUMBER I 100172 DATE: 00/00/00 PAGES: 31
"RESIDENTIAL INDOOR DUST AND YARD SOIL ARSENIC CONCENTRATION
ASSOCIATED WITH COPPER SMELTER DEPOSITION: CORRELATION WITH
URINARY ARSENIC LEVELS IN CHILDREN" (66-67.3)
FRANZEN, DAVE
ECOLOGY & ENVIRONMENT, INC. (EirE)
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------~---------------------------------------------~~
FILEI 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~ AUTHOR:
ORGAN I ZAT I ON:
ADDRESSEE. :
ORGAN I ZAT I ON:
DOCUMENT TY PE I
NUMBER I 100173 DATE I 0g/04/6~ PAGES: 8
REGARDING SOIL SAMPLING IN THE MILL CREEK AREA OF ANACONDA,
MONTANA, TDD R8-6S04-06: TABULATED CONCENTRATIONS OF
ARSENIC AND LEAD IN SOIL INDOOR AIR AND VACUUM DUST
SAMPLES. (PHOTOS OF SAMPLE LOCATIONS NOT ENCLOSED)
FRANZEN DAVE
ECOLOGY'& ENVIRONMENT, INC. (E&E)
E4ISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
MEMO
---------------------------------------------------------------------------~~=
FILEs 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORG~N I ZAT I ON:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGAN I ZAT I ON:
DOCUMENT TYPE I
NUMBER: 100174 DATE I 06/23/64 PAGES: 7~
"REPORT OF SAMPLING ACTIVITIES FOR RESIDENTIAL DUST AND SOIL
SAMPLING IN ANACONDA, MONTANA AND SURROUNDING COMMUNITIES"
(TDD R6-6504-06, EPA ID .MTD 0g32g1656)
FRANZEN DAVE
ECOLOGY' & ENVIRONMENT, INC. (E~E)
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIIIb MONTANA OFFICE
REPORT/STU Y
.----------------------------------------------------------------------------~
FILEI 2021702 NUMBER I 10017~ DATEs 00/00/86 PAGES I 25
TITLE/SUBJECTs "MILL CREEK RI/FS. TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO.~. DEEP TILL
PILOT STUDY" (TTB-167FO)
ALSO REFER TO DOCUMENT 2021601, 100022
AUTHOR: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION: TETRA TECHt INC.
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICA ED
DORG~NIZATION: NOT INDICATED
OCUMENT TYPE: REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK ~ONTAN~ OPER~BLE UNIT
10/01/87 ~DMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX Page: E
.2.==~==========-_.=_._.=_._.....=a..__=_.._.=.....========================:-
FILE: 2021702 NU~BER: 100176 D~TE: 09/00/66 PAGES: 4~-
TITLE/SUBJECT: "TECHNIC~L MEMORANDUM: SOIL COLU~N LEACH BENCH TEST. MILL ~j
CREEK,. MONTANA RI/FS"--DOCUMENTS THE RESULTS OF A 8ENCH TEST ~
DESIGNED TO EVALUATE THE POTENTIAL OF USING TOPICALLY-
APPLIED WATER TO LEACH THE SURFICIAL CONTAMINATING ELEMENTS
FARTHER INTO THE SOIL PROFILE. ALSO: 2021601, 100024
NOT INDICATED
TETRA TECH1. INC.
NOT INDICA rED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCU~ENT TYPE:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZ~TION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCU~ENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100176 D~TE: 12/00/64
"ANACONDA SMELTER RI/FS. LABORATORY ANALYTICAL
CLAP). CDOCUMENT CONTROL NO . BAL TTB-030F0)
NOT INDICATED
TETRA TECH,. INC.
DOLEt STEPHEN E.
NOT lNDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
PAGES: 33~
PROTOCOL"
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100179 D~TE: 10/01/64 PAGES: 134
"FINAL WORK PLAN FOR ANACONDA SMELTER RI/FS" (77.6L16.0)
NOT INDICATED
CH2M HILL.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: .100180 DATE. 12/00/6~ PAGES: 2S
"SUMMARY OF AVAILABLE SOILS DATA - MIL.L CREEK, MONTANA"
CDOCUMENT CONTROL. NO. 8AL TTB-062DO) INCL.UDES ATTACHED
TRANSMITTAL LETTER FROM JAMES C. WINDORSKI TO JOHN WARDEL.L
DATED NOVEM8ER 26, 1~a~.
NOT INDICATED
TETRA TECH1. INC.
NOT INDICAIED
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC>
REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 20Z1702
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER. 100161 DATE. 07/00/6~ PAGES: 36
"HEALTH EFFECTS SOILS INVESTIGATION PLAN DATA REPORT"
(DOCUMENT CONTROL NO.BAL TTB-0~0DO)
NOT INDICATED
TETRA TECH1. INC.
NOT INDICA rED
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC)
REPORT/STUDY
-----------------------------------------------~------------------------------
FIL.E: 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER. 100162 DATE: 07/29/66 PAGES: S0
"INITIAL ALTERNATIVES SCREENING DOCUMENT - MILL CREEK,
MONTANA - REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/FEASIBILITY STUDY"
(IASD>. (JOB NO. 04010-097-30)
NOT INDICATED
DAMES & MOORE
NOT INDICATED
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY CAMC)
REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/87 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX Page' 7~
===.._a=========sa-a===.=D=======================~========----------------~--~
~FILE: 20a170a NUMBER: 100163 DATE: 00/00/66---------PAGES~-23--
,TITLE/SUBJECT: "ANACONDA SMELTER RI/FS TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 4 DOMESTI~
WELLWATER SAMPLING" . -
AUTHOR: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION: TETRA TECH~ INC.
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICAIED
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 20;::1702
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TY PE :
NUMBER: 100164 DATE: 06/00/66
"MILL CREEK RI/FS TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO.1
ARSENIC, CADMIUM,. AND LEAD CONCENTRATIONS IN
AND AIR'
REPORT/STUDY
PAGES~ 27
- ASSESSMENT OF
BASE It ( DOCUMEN T
---------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~
FILE: 2021702
T ITLE/SU8JECT :
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEEs
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TY PE I
NUMBER: 100166 DATEs 00/00/7~ PAGES: 2
"MILL CREEK" IN: UNDER THE SHADOW OF "'OUNT HAGGIN - THE
STORY OF ANACONOA AND DEER LODGE COUNTY FROM 1663 TO 1~76.
PAGES 1e.8-1e.~.
JOHNSONb FLORENCE
DEER LO GE COUNTY HISTORY GROUP
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MISCELLANEOUS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~~
FILE: 2021702
T I TLE/SUB.1ECT :
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATIONs
ADDRESSEEs
ORGAN I ZAT I ON:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER I 100167
TRANSMITTAL OF THE LAST OF
DENNIS SMITH SENT, AND THE
<.. 3~87S431:S~)
LOWE MIKE
CLEMENT & ASSOCIATES, INC.
8ISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIII\ MONTANA OFFICE
ROUTING SLIP
DATEI 09/17/67 PAGES: 2
THE ARTICLES FOUND FROM THE LISi
FEDERAL EXPRESS AIRBILL.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------~=
FILE: 2021702
TI TLE/SUBJECT :
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEEs
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE s
NUMBER I 1001S8 DATEs 00/00/62
"A FOLLOW-UP STUDY OF NERVE CONDUCTION VELOCITIES
EXPOSED WORKERS" VOL. 4: 721-723.
SEPPAELAEINEN ANNA "'ARIA ET AL
NEUR08EHAVIORAL TOXICOLOGY AND TERATOLOGY
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
PAGES: :3
IN LEAD
---------------------------------------------------------------------------~--
-------
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONT~N~ OPER~BLE UNIT
10/01/87 ADMINIStRAT IVE RECORD INDEX Page: i
FiLE~=202i702..=..=.=NUMSER;.i00i8;======..=DATE~=0;i00i82=========PAGES~=;~=4
TITLE/SUBJECTs "I~RC MONOGR~PHS ON THE EVALUATION OF THE CARCINOGENIC RISK
OF CHEMICALS TO HUMANS. VOL a~: SOME INDUSTRIAL CHEMICALS
AND DYESTUFFS" TH1S PUBLICATION REPRESENTS THE VIEWS AND
EXPERT OPINIONS OF ~N I~RC WORKING GROUP WHICH MET IN LYON,
FRANCEL 13-20 OCTOBER 1981. WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION
NOT INuICATED
INTERNATIONAL AGENCY FOR RESEARCH ON CANCER
AUTHOR. ALLINSONb D.W., ET AL.
ORGANIZATION: PLANT AN SOIL
~DDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED.
DOCUMENT TYPE.. NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
PAGES: '3
ON THE GROWTH OF
-------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~~-
FILE: 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZ~TION:
. ~DDRESSEE:
ORGANIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER: 100197 DATE: 00/00/70
"STANDARD METHOD OF TEST FOR M~TERIALS FINER THAN
SIEVE IN MINERAL AGGREGATES BY WASHING" IN: 1970
800K OF ASTM STANDARDS, P~RT 10. P~GES 72-73.
PHILADELPHIAb PA.
NOT INDIC~TE
AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND M~TERIALS
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
PAGES: ~
NO. 200
ANNUAL
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~-~-
FILE: 20Z1702
I TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZ~TION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TY PE :
NUMBER: 100198 D~TE: 00/00/87 P~GES: 4
"STANDARD TEST METHOD FOR MATERIALS FINER THAN 7~-UM
(NO. 200> SIEVE IN MINERAL AGGREGATES BY WASHING" IN:
1987 ANNUAL BOOK OF ASTM STANDARDS VOL. 4.03: 16-19.
PHILADELPHIAb PA., 1987.
NOT INDICATE
A~ERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING ~ND MATERI~LS
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ~RTICLE
---------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~
FILE: 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER: 100199 DATE: 00/00/71 PAGES: 2
"STANDARD METHOD OF TEST FOR SIEVE OR SCREEN ANALYSIS OF
FINE AND CO~RSE AGGREGATES" IN: 1971 ANNUAL BOOK OF ASTM
STANDARDS~ PT 10. PAGES 88-89. PHILADELPHIA, PA.
NOT INDICHTED
AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSP~PER/JOURN~L ARTICLE
---------------------------------------------------------------------------~~-
FILE: 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHO R :
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANI ZATION:
DOCUMENT TY PE :
NUMBER: 100200 D~TE: 00/00/87 PAGES: 5
"STAND~RD METHOD FOR SIEVE ANALYSIS OF FINE AND COARSE
AGGREGATES" IN. 1987 ANNUAL BOOK OF ASTM STANDARDS VOL.
4.03: 42-46. PHILAELPHIA, PA., 1987.
NOT INDICATED
A~ERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
----------------------------------------------------------------------------~-
-------
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
;~~~~~~~.======.==..___.=.~2:;~;~!:~r;~~.~;~2~2=!~2;~====~============~:2:~=:.~
F' I LE: 212121 71212 .NUMBER: 10f21~1211 D~TE: 121121/1210/65 PAGES: 1" ~~
TITLE/SUBJECT: "RATE OF WATER INTAKE IN THE FIELD" IN: METHODS OF SOIL w,
ANALYSIS. PART 1. PHYSICAL AND MINERALOGICAL PROPERTIES. :
C.A. BLACK~ EDITOR. PAGES 197-~f2I9.
AUTHOR: BERTRAND, ~NSON R.
ORGANIZATION: AMERICAN SOCIETY OF AGRONOMY
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
F"I LE: 20Z 1 71212
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 1f21f21~1212 DATE. 0121/0121/65 PAGES: 17
"BULK DENSITY" IN: METHODS OF SOIL ANALYSIS. PART I.
PHYSICAL AND MINERALOGICAL PROPERTIES. C.A. BLACK, EDITOR.
PAGES 374-39121.
EcLAKEJ.. G. R.
AMERI~AN SOCIETY OF AGRONOMY
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MISCELLANEOUS
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
='ILE. 202171212
TITLE/SUBJ'ECT.
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGAN IZAT ION:
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER: 100203
"SOIL CHEMISTRY" PREFACE
eOHN, HINRICH L.J.. ET AL
JOHN WILEY & SON~, INC.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MISCELLANEOUS
DATE: 00/121121/79 PAGES: 3
AND PAGE 298 ON IMPORTANT IONS.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
='ILE. 21212171212
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATIONs
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION.
)OCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER. 112112121214 DATE. 1210/0121/77 PAGES: 6
"THE SORPTION OF LEAD AND CADMIUM SPECIES BY CLAY MINERALS"
VOL. 30: 1417-1422.
FARRAH, HELEN., ET AL
AUST. J. CHEM.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
------------~-----------------------------------------------------------------
~ILE. ZI2IZ1702
rITLE/SUBJ'ECT.
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
:)OCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100206 DATE: 121121/0121/81
"METAL POLLUTION IN THE AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT"
APPENDIX). BERLIN HEIDELBERG NEW YORK
FORSTNER, U., ET AL
SPRINGER-VERL.,AG
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MISCELLANEOUS
PAGES: '3
(COpy OF
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
q LE: 202171212
rITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
ORGAN IZAT I ON.
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
)OCUMENT TY PE :
NUMBER. 11210207 DATE. 08/121121/86 PAGES: 2
"EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDY CONDUCTED IN POPULATIONS LIVING AROUND
NONFERROUS SMELTERJ.. VOLUMES I AND II" VOL 1: PB87-12112183
EPA/60f21/1-81/07f21A ~6~ P. VOL 2: pe87-121091
EPA/60121/1-81/12170B 660 P. (MICROFICHE)
HARTWELL, TYLER D. (PH.D. ).~ ET AL.
RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUT~
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONT~N~ OPER~BLE UNIT
10/01/87 ~DMINIStR~TIVE RECORD INDEX Page: 7-
=a======8=a=======a_--__~8_-.==8-_a.aaa.-=-=-=--=======-==----------=------~--
FILE: 2021702 NUMBER7 100208 - - D~TE: 00/00/S7---------P~GES~-4---
TITLE/SUBJECT: "~ TRE~TISE ON LIMNOLOGY" VOLUME I: GEOGRAPHY PHYSICS
~ND CHEMISTRY. ' ,
~UTHOR: HUTCHINSON G. EVELYN
ORG~NIZ~TION: JOHN WILEY' & SONS, INC.
~DDRESSEE: NOT INDIC~TED
ORG~NIZ~TION: NOT INDIC~TED
DOCUMENT TYPE: MISCELLANEOUS
-------------------------------------------------------~-------------------~-
FILE: 20;::1702
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR :
ORGANIZ~TION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 10020~ D~TE: 00/00/77 P~GES: 4
"MORT~LITY EXPERIENCE IN REL~TION TO ~ ME~SURED ARSENIC
TRIOXIDE EXPOSURE" VOL. 19: 127-130. '
PINTO SHERM~N S. ET ~L
ENVIRONMENTAL HE~LTH PERSPECTIVES
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDIC~TED
NEWSP~PER/JOURN~L ARTICLE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~~-
FILE: 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORG~NIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100210 D~TE:
"HE~VY MET~L POLLUTION IN SOILS OF
ONL Y ) .
~A~~~I~~iEN~~~~~Osocl~T~~S PRESS
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDICATED
MISCELLANEOUS
00/00/81 P~GESI 7~
J~P~N" (T~BLE OF CONTENTS
-------------------------------------------------------------------------~=~~~
FILE: 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR I
ORGANIZ~TION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100211 D~TEI 09/00/83 P~GESx 6
"DIET~RY INTAKE OF LEAD ~ND BLOOD LEAD CONCENTR~TION IN
E~RLY INF~NCY" VOL. 137: 886-891.
RYU, J~CQUELINE E., ET. AL
AM. J. DIS. CHILD.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~=
FILE: 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZ~TION:
~DDRESSe:Er
ORGANIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100212
"~ONT~N~ BIRD DISTRI9UTION,
L~TILONG" PUBLISHED BY P.D.
SKAAR,. P~L~ER DAVID
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
D~TE: 00/00/7~ .
PRELIMIN~RY M~PPING BY
SKAAR.
P~GES: 60
---------------------------------------------------------------------------~~-
FILEr 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZ~TION I
~DDRESSEEI
ORG~NIZ~TION:
DOCU~ENT TY PE :
NU~BER: 100213 D~TE: 00/00/82 PAGES I 28
"DISTRIBUTION OF MONT~N~ AMPHI9IANS, REPTILES, M~MMALS"
(PRELI~IN~RY MAPPING BY L~TILONG)
THOMPSON L~RRY S.
~ONTANA ~UDUBON COUNCIL
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021702 NU~BERt 100214 D~TEI 00/00/81 P~GESI 17
TITLE/SUBJECT: "LEACHING OF MET~LS FROM THE A-HORIZON OF A SPRUCE FOREST
SOIL" VOL. 15: 353-36~.
~UTHOR: TYLER GERMUNO
ORGANIZ~TION: WATER: AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION
~DDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
ORG~NIZ~TION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: NEWSP~PER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
III
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE II'
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPER~BLE UNIT ~
10/01/67 ~DMINIS'rR~TIVE RECORD INDEX . p~ e.i!
-=-====================-..=-==.-.-.-........===.========================2-~JI
FILE: ZIZI2171Z1Z NUMBER: 100C::15 D~TE: '0121/121121/74 PAGES'-- .
TITLE/SUBJECT: "BIOSTAiISTICAL ANALYSIS" PAGES 107-108. WILLIAM D. MCELROy4 I
AND CARL P. SWANSON, EDITORS.
AUTHOR: ZAR JERROLD H. .
ORGANIZATION: PRENTICE-HALL, INC.
~DDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: MISCELLANEOUS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 11Z10~ 16 DATE s 0~ 1011 63 . PAGES: 14
"SCREENING STUDY ANACONDA SMELTER SITE, ANACONDA, MONTANA"
(REFER TO DOCUMENT 20~171Z11, 11Z10001F)
NOT INDICATED
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC)
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATIONs
DOCUMENT TYPEs
NUMBERs 100217 DATE: 00/00/65 PAGES: 78
"~SSESSMENT OF HEALTH EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH AIRBORNE
TRANSPORT OF HAZARDOUS SUBST~NCES FROM THE ANACONDA
SMELTER SITE. FINAL REPORT" (DOCUMENT NO. 228-TS1-RT-BTDZ-2)
(REFER TO DOCUMENT a0~171211, 112112112113)
NOT INDICATED
CAMP DRESSER & McKEE, INC. (CDM)
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEs 20:::1702
TITLE/SUBJECTs
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATIONs
ADDRESSEEs
ORGANIZATIONs
DOCUMENT TYPEs
NUMBERs 11210Z16 DATE: 00/00/84 PAGES: 48
"FINAL PRELIMINARY ENDANGERMENT ASSESSMENT (PEA) FOR
ANACONDA SMELTER RI/FS" (77.6L16.0) .
(REFER TO DOCUMENT 2021706, 100001)
NOT INDICATED
CH2M HILL
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
FILE. 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT.
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER. 10121219 DATE. 00/00/66 P~GES: 13:
"END~NGERMENT ASSESSMENT: ~ILL CREEK, MONTANA ANACONDA
SMELTER SITE. REVISED FINAL REPORT"
(REFER TO DOCUMENT 2021706, 100003)
NOT INDICATED
CLEMENT & ASSOCI~TES, INC.
NOT INDICATED
USEPA-VIII~ MONTANA OFFICE
REPORT/STUuY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT.
~UTHOR.
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100~~0 DATE: 12/02/6~ PAGES:
"PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF THE RESIDENTIAL DUST AND SOIL
SAMPLING IN ANACONDA1. MONTANA!. AND SURROUNDING COMMUNITIES"
(~LSO REFER TO DOCUM~NT 20217~1, 100013A)
HILLMAN, JUANITA
ECOLOGY 8. ENVIRONMENT, INC. (E8.E)
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
MEMO
2~
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPER~BLE UNIT
10/01/67 ~DMINIStR~TIVE RECORD INDEX Page: -
==_.===================------==========----------=====-----------------------
FILE I 2021702 NUMBER~-100221 -----DATE~ 00/0~/84---------PAGES~-~~--
TITLE/SUBJECT: "STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES" ANACONDA SMELTER RIfFS.
(REFER TO DOCUMENT 2021601, 100~02 OR 2021701, 100017)
~UTHOR: NOT INDICATED
ORG~NIZATION: TETR~ TECH~ INC.
~DDRESSEE: NOT INDICAIED
ORG~NIZATION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TY PE :
NUMBER: 100222 D~TEI 06/29/85 PAGES:
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM: SOIL SAMPLES - MILL CREEK AREA
(ALSO REFER TO DOCUMENT 2021606, 100033)
SCHMIDT1. CAROLE
TETRA Tc.CH,. INC.
BISHOP MIKE
USEP~-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
MEMO
---------------------------------------~--------------------------------~-~~--
FILE: 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORG~N IZ~T I ON:
j:lDDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZj:lTION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100223 DATE: 12/00/83
"PROJECT SUMMARY ON MOBILE SYSTEM FOR EXTRACTING
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS FROM EXCAVATED SOILS"
(EPA-~00/S2-63-100)
NOT INDICATED
USEPA .
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
PAGES:
SPILLED
-
----------------------------------------------------------------------------~-
FILE: 20Z1702
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORG~NIZATtON:
~ ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATIONI
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100224
"EV~LU~TION CRITERI~
AREAS. REVISION 1"
NOT INDICATED
USEPA
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
D~TE: 01/0~/65 PAGES:
FOR EXISTING DATA FROM CERCLA STUDY
5
'----------~~~---------------------------------------------------------------~~,
FILEI 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZ~TION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 10022~ D~TE: 10/00/85 PAGES: 66:
"H~NDBOOK OF REMEDIAL ACTIONS AT WASTE DISPOSAL SITES"
(REVISED) EPA/62~/6-65/00~
NOT INDICATED
USEP~
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------~
FILE: 2021702
T I TloE/SUBJECT :
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZATIONI
j:lDDRESSEE:
ORGj:lN I Z AT I ON:
DOCUMENT TY PE :
NUMBER: 100226 D~TEI 06/19/86
"WORK PLAN FOR MILL CREEK SITE MONTAN~"
NOT INDICATED
USEP~
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
PAGES: 57
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE I 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORGAN I ZAT I ON:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANI ZAT ION:
DOCUMENT TY PE :
NUMBER: 100227
"GUIDELINES FOR THE HEALTH
MIXTURES" VOL ~1. NO. 165
NOT INDICATED
FEDERAL REGISTER
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MISCELLANEOUS
D~TE: 09/24/86 PAGES: 33
RISK ASSESSMENT OF CHEMICAL
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONT~N~ OPER~BLE UNIT
10/01/87 ~DMINISTR~TIVE RECORD INDEX P~ge: \11
~I~E~~iBi}~~i:=:::~~:~~M~~~~~~~0i~~;:=:;:::~g~~if=~~~~~;~5::::~:::=PAGES~=~~t
INVESTIG~TION REPORT"
(DOCUMENT CONTROL NO. B~L TTB-05ZD0)
NOT INDICATED
TETR~ TECH'r INC.
NOT INDICA ED
ANACONDA MINER~LS COMP~NY (~MC)
REPORT/STUDY
~UTHORs
ORGANIZATION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEs 202170Z
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR :
ORGANIZATION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100229 D~TEs 11/1c:/8~ PAGES: 1"
TRANSMITT~L AND REPORT TITLED: "~N~COND~ SMELTER RI/FS
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 1L BACKGROUND WELLS ~T THE AN~tONDA
SMELTER SITE" DATED OCTOBE~~ 198~ PROVIDED BY TETR~ TECH,
INC.~ BELLEVUE, WA. (BAL TT~-060D0)
TILM~N R~Y
~N~CONb~ MINERALS COMPANY (~MC)
BISHOP MIKE
USEP~-VIII, MONT~NA OFFICE
LETTER
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECTs
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TYPEs
NUMBER: 100230 DATE:
TR~NSMITTAL OF THE RESULTS OF MILL
SAMPLES, ~N~CONDA.SMELTER RI/FS.
BINGH~M~ F.T.,. ET AL.
TETRA T~CH,. INC.
BISHOP MIKE
USEP~-VIII, MONT~NA OFFICE
LETTER
10/24/8~ P~GES: 2
CREEK DRINKING WATER
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FIL£s 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECTs
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZATIONs
~DDRESSEEs
ORGANIZ~TIONs
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER: 100231 DATEs 10/00/86 PAGES: 66
"SURF~CE WATER ~ND SEDIMENT INVESTIG~TIONL ~NACONDA SMELTER
RI/FS" DATED SPRINGL 1986. UNPUBLISHED D~T~ BY TETR~ TECH,
INC. FOURTH SAMPLINb.
NOT INDICATED
TETRA TECHL INC.
NOT INDICA rED
~NACONDA MINER~LS COMPANY (AMC)
REPORT/STUDY
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEs 20Z1702
TITLE/SUBJECTs
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATIONs
ADDRESSEEs
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPEs
NUMBERs 100232 DATEs 08/00/8~
"SOILS D~T~ REPORTL ~NACOND~ SMELTER RI/FS"
~N~COND~ MINERALS ~OMPANY. tBAL TTa-0~~OOJ
NOT INDICATED
TETRA TECH'r INC.
NOT INDICA ED
ANACONDA MINERALS COMP~NY (~MC)
REPORT/STUDY
P~GES: 132
PREPARED FOR
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEs 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECTs
~UTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE:
OR~NIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBERs 100233 DATE:
"SCREENING STUDY: ~NACOND~ SMELTER
DOCUMENT AVAILABLE UPON RE~UEST
NOT INDICATED
~NACOND~ MINERALS COMPANY (~MC)
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
00/00/84 PAGES,
SITE, ~N~CONDA, MONTANA"
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONT~N~ OPER~BLE UNIT
10/01/87 ~DMINISTR~TIVE RECORD INDEX P~ge: 7E
s==a====================-=-----==---------------------- -----------
FILE: 2021702 NUMBER;-100~34---------DATE7-00/00;83====-----PAGES~=====
~ITLE/SUB.1ECT: "FEASIBILITY STUDY TO RESOLVE aUESTIONS ON THE RELATIONSHIP
OF ARSENIC IN DRINKING WATER TO SKIN CANCER". TECHNICAL
REPORT 84-8t CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, UNIVER-
SITY OF PIT S8URGH. -
DOCUMENT AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST.
ANDELMAN J.B. ET AL
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
~UTHOR:
ORGAN I ZAT I ON:
ADDRESSEE:
ORG~NI Z~TION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEI 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHORI
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGAN I ZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 10023~ D~TE: 08/21/84
"REVIEW OF CH2MHILL ENDANGERMENT ASSESSMENT FOR
~UGUST 21L 1984" BY THE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL
DOCUMENT ~VAILABLE UPON REQUEST.
ANDERSON E.
USEPA HE~DQU~RTERS
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
PAGES:
ANACONDA--
HEAL TH.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~-~~
FILE: 2021702
TITLE/SUB.JECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGAN I ZAT I ON:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGAN I ZAT I ON:
DOCUMENT TYPE I
NUMBER: 100236 D~TE: 00/00/82
"CHILDREN, THE BAROMETER OF ENVIRONMENTAL LEAD"
VOL. 27:3-31\ AS CITED IN USEPA 1984C.
DOCUMENT AVAlLABLE UPON REQUEST.
ANGLEL CAROL R. 9 ET ~L.
ADV. ~EDIATR.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MISCELLANEOUS
P~GES:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------~
FILE I 2021702
.tITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHORI
"ORGAN I ZAT I ON:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANI ZAT I ON I
DOCUMENT TY PE :
NUMBER: 100237 D~TEI 05/06/8~
REGARDING URINARY ARSENIC VALUES REQUESTED BY EPA.
REFER TO DOCUMENT 2021707, 100002
BINDER SUE (M.D. >
CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL (CDC>
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
MEMO
PAGES: 2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~--~
'FILE: 2021702
TITLE/SUB.JECT:
~UTHOR:
ORGAN I Z~T I ON:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGAN I ZAT I ON:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100238 D~TE: 03/00/8~
"MONTAN~ URIN~RY ARSENIC SURVEY" D~TED M~ReH,
COWRITTEN BY S. BINDER,- D. FORNEY, D. PASCAL,
DOCUMENT ~VAIL~BLE UPON REQUEST.
BINDER SUE (M.D.)
CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL (eDC>
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
PAGES:
1985.
ET AL
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021702 NUMBER: 100239 D~TEI 07/00/8~ PAGES: 23
TITLE/SUBJECT: II~NACOND~, MONTANA, JULY, 198~ ARSENIC STUDY", CDC, ATLANTA,
GA.
REFER TO DOCUMENT 20~1707, 100003.
~UTHOR: BINDER SUE (M.D. >
ORGANIZ~TION: CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL (eDe>
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
DO ORGAN I ZAT I ON: NOT I ND I CATED
CUMENT TYPE: REPORT/STUDY
,------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
~~~~~~~~-=================~~~~~~;~~~!~~;=~;;~~~=~~~;~=================~~~::_';I
FILE7-Z021702 NUMBER: 100240 DATE: 00/00/86 PAGES:-3-
TITLE/SUBJ~CTI "ADDeNDUM TO THE JULY URINARY ARSENIC SURVEY: MILL CREE~
FOLLOWUP. " .
REFER TO DOCUMENT 2021707,100004.
AUTHOR: BINDER SUE (M.D.)
ORGANIZATIONs CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL (cec>
ADDRESSEE: MARGOLIS STEPHEN (Ph.D. >
ORGANIZATION: CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL (CDC>
DOCUMENT TYPE: MEMO
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT I
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATIONs
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPEI
NUMBERs 100241 DATEs 00/00/66 PAGES:
"FLORA OF MONTANA~ PART 11"1 DEPARTMENT OF BOTANY AND
MICROBIOLOGY BOZ~MAN MONT~NA.
DOCUMENT AVA~LABLE UPON REQUEST.
BOOTH W.E. ET AL
MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
----------------------------------------------------------------------------~
FILEI 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGAN IZ AT I ON:
DOCUMENT TYPEI
NUMBER: 100242 DATE I 00/00/79
"ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY OF THE ELEMENTS",
-------
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/87 ~DMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX P~ge: E~
-========================================================================-----
~ILE: 2021702 NUMBER: 100246 DATE I 00/00/84 PAGES'-----
~ITLE/SUBJECT: CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS (CFR). 1984. 40 CFR 141, EPA .
NATIONAL INTERIM PRIMARY DRINKING WATER REGULATIONS.
DOCUMENT AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST.
NOT INDICATED
USEPA
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MISCELLANEOUS
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGAN I ZAT I ON:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE I 2021702
TITL.E/SUBJECT I
AUTHOR I
ORGANIZATIONI
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE I
NUMBER: 100247 DATE. 01/24/79
"FUGITIVE DUST EMISSION FACTORS" .
COLLINS, CHARLES A.
WYOMING DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MEMO
PAGES: :;
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~-~~
FILE. 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT I
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATIONs
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANI ZAT I ON:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBERs 100248 DATEs 00/00/76
"DISPERSION-DEPOSITION FROM AERIAL SPRAY RELEASES"
SYMPOSIUM ON ATMOSPHERIC TURBULENCE, DIFFUSION AND
QUALITY. PAGES ~20-Sa7.
DUMBALD R. K.
AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
PAGES: 8
THIRD
AIR
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~~=~
FILE. 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHORs
~ORGANIZATION'
ADDRESSEEI'
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER I 100249 DATE I 00/00/74
"CADMIUM IN THE ENVIRONMENT"~ 2ND EDITION.
DOCUMENT AVAILABLE UPON RE~U~ST.
FRIBERG L.T.
CRC PRESS1.INC.
NOT INDICHTED
NOT INDICATED
MISCELLANEOUS
PAGES:
----------------------------~-----------------------------------------------~~
FILE: 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGAN I ZATION:
~DDRESSEEI
'ORGAN I Z~T I ON:
DOCUrwlENT TY PE .
NUMBER: 1002~0 DATE I 00/00/75 PAGES:
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINANTS OF LEAD 8URDENS IN CHILDREN",
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HEAVY METALS IN THE ENYIRONMENT:
SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGSb TORONTO... CANADA, 10/7:5. INSTITUTE
FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STU IES~ TORuNTO, CANADA.
DOCUMENT AVAILA~LE UPON R~QUEST.
GALKE" W.~.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~-~~
FILEI 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR s
ORGAN I ZAT I ON I
~DDRE5SEEI
DORGAN I ZAT I ON I
OCUrwlENT TY PE :
NUMBER I 1002S1 DATE I 00/00/79 PAGES: 238
"DEER L.ODGE VALLEY DISPERSION STUDY", rwlONTANA AIR QUALITY
BUREAU... HELENA, rwlONTANA.
GELHAU~ J.W. ET AL
rwlONTANA'AIR nUALITY BUREAU
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
----------------------------------------------------------------------------~-
-------
~N~COND~ SME~TER SITE
MI~~ CREEK MONT~N~ OPER~eLE UNIT
~~~~~~~~=============~====~2~~~;;!~~~~~;=~;~2:2=~~2~~=================~:~;~=,_!I
F I ~E: 2021 702 NUMBER: 100~5~ D~TE: 00/00/ 77 P~GES I ,1\
TIT~E/SUBJECT: "FLOR~ OF MONT~NAL CONIFERS ~ND MONOCOTS", MONTANA STATE ~
UNIVERSITY eOZEM~N MT.
DOCUMENT AVAILABLE LpON REQUEST.
AUTHOR: HAHN B.E.
ORGANIZ~TION: MONT~NA STATE UNIVERSITY
~DDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED !
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED I
DOCUMENT TYPE: REPORT/STUDY j
----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1
'I,
FILE: 20;::170~
TIT~E/SUeJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORG~NIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100253 D~TE: 00/00/77 PAGES:
"ARSENIC DETERMINATION AND ARSENIC, LEAD, ~ND COPPER CONTENT
OF MISSOURI SOILS"
DOCUMENT AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST.
HESS R.E. ET AI.
UNIVERSITy'OF MISSOURI, AGRIC. EXP. STN. RES. BULL.
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURN~L ARTICLE
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FII.E: 2021702
TIT~E/SUeJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORG~NIZATION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100~~4 DATE: 00/00/82
"MORTALITY OF ANACOND~ SMELTER WORKERS IN RE~ATION
ARSENIC AND OTHER EXPOSURES"
DOCUMENT AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST.
HIGGINS I. ET AI.
UNIVERS\TY OF MICHIGAN, DEPARTMENT OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
NOT INDIC~TED .
NOT INDIC~TED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTIC~E
PAGES:
TO
----------------------------------------------------------------------------_.
FI~E: 2021702
TIT~E/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZ~TION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORGANIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100~~~ D~TE: 00/00/78 PAGES:
~g~~~~~I~~~Yp6~~a~I6~A~+B~~~ HISTORIC~L EMISSIONS INVENTORY,
DOCUMENT AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST.
NOT INDICATED
HISTORIC RESEARCH ASSOCIATION
NOT INDICATED
MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021702
TIT~E/SU8JECT:
AUTHOR:
ORG~NIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 1002~6 DATE: 00/00/78
"ESTIMATION OF AIR CONCENTRATIONS DUE TO THE
OF SURFACE CONTAMINATION" VOL. 12:797-802.
HORST THOMAS W.
ATOMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
- PAGES: 5
SUSPENSION
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 1002~7 D~TE: 00/00/84 PAGES:
HSUPERFUND AND FUGITIVE DUST: AN ~IR QUALITY STUDY"
DOCUMENT AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST.
IVES J.A. ET AI.
ANACONDA M\NERALS COMPANY
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
I MILL CREEK MONT~N~ OPERABLE UNIT
ill ~~~Z~702~=:=-=~~NUMBE~7~f;~~~;~~;~~~~~;~~~E~~~~~00;83====~====;~G~~~;~=~~
E/SUBJECTI ARSENIC AND RESPIRATORY CANCER IN MAN: FOLLOW-UP OF AN
OCCUPATIONAL STUDY" IN: LEDERER W. AND FENSTERHEIM R.
~DERISTORS~ ARSENIC: INDUSTRIAL, SIOMEbICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL
.. PEC rIVES.
DOCUMENT AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST.
AUTHOR: LEE-FELDSTEIN
~G~NIZATION: VAN NOSTRAND REINHOLD COMPANY
. ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
')GANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
!!' QUMENT TYPE I M I SCELL.ANEOUS
1t--------------------------------------------------------------------------
LEI 2021702 NUMBER I 1002~9 D~TEI 00/00/66 P~GES:
~E/SUBJECTI "~N~LYSIS OF THE POTENTI~L FOR AIRBORNE RECONTAMINATION OF
MILL CREEK, MONT~NA FROM THE RESUSPENSION TR~NSPORT AND
DEPOSITION OF SURF~CE SOIL ARSENIC FROM THE AN~CONDA'SMELTER
S I.TE "
DOCUMENT AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST.
NOT INDICATED
MCVEHIL-MONNETT ASSOCIATES
NOT INDICATED
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC)
REPORT/STUDY
AUTHOR:
")RGANI ZAT I ON I
ADDRESSEE I
IRGANI ZATION I
,CtJ/ltENT TYPE I
-------------------------------------------------------------------------~---
ILEI 2021702 NUMBER I 100260 DATE I 00/00/74 PAGES: 13
ITLE/SU8.1ECTI "DEVELOPMENT OF EMISSION FACTORS FOR FUGITIVE DUST SOURCES"
(EPA-4~0/3-74-037) PAGES 144-162.
AUTHOR I NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION: MR I
ADDRESSEE I NOT INDICATED
~~!:!~~~l_~~~~~!~~!~~~~--------------------------------------------------
~I 2021702 NUMBER I 100261 DATE I 03/00/76 PAGES I 21 ~
ITLE/SUBJECTI "FUGITIVE EMISSIONS FROM INTEGRATED IRON AND STEEL
PLANTS" (EPA-600/2-76-0~0, MARCH)
AUTHOR I NOT INDICATED
)R~IZATIONI MRI
ADDRESSEE I NOT INDICATED
)RGANIZATION. NOT INDICATED
)CUI'IENT TYPE I REPORT/STUDY
._-------------------------------~------------------------------------------~
:LEI 202170Z
:TLE/SUBJECT I
AUTHOR I
IRGANIZATI ON I
~DDRESSEE.
IRGANI ZATION I
ICUI'IENT TYPE.
NUMBER I 100262 DATE I 06/00/76 PAGES.
"BLOOD LEAD LEVELS IN CHILDREN IN TWO BRITISH COLUMBI~
COMMUNITIES" INI HEMPHILL~ D.D.~ EDITOR~ TRACE SUBSTANCES IN
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH I PRO~EEDIN~S OF TH~ U. OF MISSOURI'S
12TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON TRACE SUBSTANCES IN ENVIRONMENTAL
HEALTH, JUNE~ 1976. DOCUMENT AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST.
NERI ~.C. Er AL
u. OF MISSOURI, COLUMBIA
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MISCELLANEOUS
.----------------------------------------------------------------------------
LEI 2021702
TLE/SUBJECT I
AUTHOR:
RGAN I Z A T I ON :
ADDRESSEE I
RGAN I Z A T I ON I
CUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER I 100263 DATEI 03/00/63 PAGES:
REPORT OF THE NHANES II TIME TREND ANALYSIS REVIEW GROUP.
(FROM MEETING IN MARCH~ 1963~ RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NORTH
CAROLINA. AVAILABLE FuR INS~ECTION AT ENVIRONMENTAL
CRITERIA AND ASSESSMENT OFFICE, U.S. EPA, RESEARCH TRIANGLE
PARK\ NORTH CAROLINA>
NOT lNDICATED
NHANES II
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MISCELLANEOUS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
~ILL CREEK ~ONTANA O~ERABLE UNIT
10/01/67 AD~INISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX Page: 8
FiLE~~202i702=====~a_NU~BER~.i002s:==a==~===DATE~~08i28i86=========PAGES~====~
TITLE/SUBJECT: MEMO TD STEPHEN E. DOLE~ SUPERFUND COORDINATOR~ ANACONDA
MINERALS COMPANY. ANACuNDA, MONTANA. SUPPLEM~NTED
SEPTEM8ER 6 1966.
DOCUMENT AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST.
ROTH" URBAN L.
NOT lNDICATED
DOLE STEPHEN E.
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC)
MEMO
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 20~170~
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100265 DATE: 01/22/66 PAGES:
"TO~SOIL ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATIONS, ANACONDA, MONTANA
AREA REPORT"
DOCUMENT AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST.
SCHAFER" WILLIAM M.
NOT IND1CATED
STEPHENSO~ SAM
ANACONDA M~NERALS COMPANY (AMC>
REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 20~1702
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TY~E:
NUMBER: 100266 DATE: 00/00/60
"SUeCLINICAL LEAD NEUROPATHY" VOL. 1:413-420.
DOCUMENT AVAILABLE U~ON REQUEST.
SEPPAELAEINEN ANNA MARIA ET AL
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MEDICINE
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWS~APER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
~AGES:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGAN IZAT I ON:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TY~E:
NUMBER: 100~6a DATE:
"FLUE DUST STORAGE FACILITY, DRAFT
INVESTIGATION REPORT"
REFER TO DOCUMENT 2021702, 100226
NOT INDICATED.
TETRA TECH'r INC.
NOT INDICA ED
ANACONDA MINERALS COM~ANY (AMC>
REPORT/STUDY
0~/00/6~ PAGES: 164
STAGE 1, REMEDIAL
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 20~170~
TITl.E/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORG~NIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TY~E:
NUMBER: 100Z69 DATE: 00/00/66 P~GES:
"TECHNICAl. MEMORANDUM NO. 4. D~TA VALIDATION REPORT"
(TTS-166FO)
DOCUMENT AVAILABLE U~ON REQUEST.
NOT INDICATED
TETRA TECH'r INC.
NOT INDICA ED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021702
TITl.E/SUBJECTI
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TY~E:
NUMBER. 100Z70 DATE: 0~/00/66 ~AGES: 28J
.DR~FT REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION REPORT. MILL CREEK, MONTANA
RI/FS"
REFER TO DOCUMENT 202170~, 100010A
NOT INDICATED
TETRA TECH'r INC.
NOT INDICA ED
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC>
REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONT~N~ OPERABLE UNIT
10/1211/87 ~DMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX Page: e-
==.-.==============~===-=-=======--------------===----------------------------
FILE: 212121702 NUMBER: 100271---------CATEI 07/02/84---------PAGES~-~~--
TITLE/SUBJECT: "FUGITIVE PARTICULATE EMISSIONS" MEMORANDUM FROM COLORADO
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DIVISION,
DENVER\ COLORADO.
TISTINIC T.
NOT I ND I bHED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MEMO
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZ~TION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORGAN I ZAT I ON:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------~-
FILE: 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 11210272
"CO~L MINING EMISSION FACTOR
TRC PROJECT. 12191218-010-1215.
NOT INDICATED
TRC
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDIC~TED
REPORT/STUDY
DATE: 07/00/81 PAGES: 1~5
DEVELOPMENT AND MODELING STUDY"
-----------------------------------------------------------------------~~~-~~-
FILE: 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORGAN I Z~T I ON:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 11210273 DATE: 09/00/84 PAGES:
"~IR QU~LITY CRITERIA FOR LEAD. REVIEW DRAFT. ENVIRONMENTAL
CRITERIA AND ~SSESSMENT OFFICE. EPA/61Z11Z1 8-83-02 88
AVAIL~BLE UPON REQUEST
NOT INDIC~TED
USEPA HEADQUARTERS
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~
FILE: 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZ~TION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORGANIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 11210274 DATE: 10/00/8~
"LAeOR~TORY DATA V~LID~TION: FUNCTIONAL GUIDELINES
EV~LU~TING INORGANICS ANALYSES" WASHINGTON D.C.
AV~ILABLE UPON REQUEST
NOT INDIC~TED
USEP~,. OFFICE OF EMERGENCY ~ND REMEDIAL RESPONSE
NOT INDICATED'
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
P~GES:
FOR
------------------------------------------------------------------------~~-~~=
FILE. 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZATION:
DOCUMENT TY PE :
NUMBER I 10027~ DATE: 00/00/86 P~GES:
"COMPILATION OF D~T~ COLLECTED BY EPA IN THE VICINITY OF
MILL CREEK,. MONT~N~"(DOCUMENT CONTROL NO. 228-TS1-RT-CYTQ-l)
DOCUMENT ~vAILAeLF UPON REQUEST.
NOT INDICATED
USEP~
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
-------------------------------------------------------------~----------------
FILE. 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
ADDRESSEEr
ORGAN I ZAT I ON:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
PAGES:
NUMBER: 10121276
uST~TISICAL PRINCIPLES IN
NEW YORK NY. 91217 PAGES
~VAILABLE UPON REQUEST
WINE R,. e. J.
MCGRAw-HILL BOOK CO.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MISCELL~NEOUS
DATE I 00/00/71
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
~~~~~~~~==========a=_=====~~~!~;;!~~r;~~=~;;~~~=;~~;;=================~:E:~=~~
FILE. 2021702 NUMBERs 100277 DATE: 07/2~/82 PAGES' 1~-' .
TITLE/SUBJECT: TRANSMITTAL OF "AMBIENT AIR MONITORING PLAN FOR DEER LODGE -
VALLEY". DOCUMENT ATTACHED.
AUTHOR: JONES W.S.
ORGANIZATION: ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY CAMC>
ADDRESSEE: R088INS, HAROLD w.
ORGANIZATION: MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
DOCUMENT TYPE: LETTER
----------------------------------------------------------------------------_.
FILEs 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGAN IZAT I ON.
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100278 DATE: 11/00/7~ PAGES: 15
"MONTANA AIR POLLUTION STUDY - A STUDY OF THE FEASIBILITY
OF PERFORMING AN INVENTORY OF HISTORICAL EMISSIONS AT BUTTE
AND ANACONDAL MONTANA, NOVEMBER 1979"
RAISCH ROBERT. ET AL
MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHORs
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100279 DATE: 08/17/79 PAGES: 113
"MONTANA AIR POLLUTION STUDY - UPDATE AND IMPROVEMENT OF THE
EMISSION INVENTORY - NOVEMBER 1979".
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONT~N~ OPER~8LE UNIT
~~~~~~~Z_--------- ~DMINISTR~TIYE RECORD INDEX Page: E~
------------------===--~--=---=======----------.-====----- ----------------
FILE: 2021702 NUMBER~-100283 -------CATEI 00/~0/79====-----PAGES~-~:--
TITLE/SUBJECT: "PHYTOTOXICITY OF ZINC" NICKELL CADMIUM, LEAD COPPER, AND
CHROMIUM IN THREE P~STuRE PLANT SPECIES SUPPLIED WITH
GRADU~TED AMOUNTS FROM THE SOIL" VOL. 27:241-253.
DIJKSHOORN W. ET AL
NETHERLANDS JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
AUTHOR:
ORG~NIZATION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHORI
ORG~NIZ~TIONI
~DDRESSEE.
ORG~N I ZAT I ON.
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100284
"CHEMISTRY AND ECOTOXICOLOGY
CONNELL D.W. ET AL
JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MISCELLANEOUS
D~TE: 00/00/84 PAGES: 7
OF POLLUTION" PP. 354-3E.3.
------------------------------------------------------~-------------------~~--,
FILE: 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT.
~UTHOR.
ORGANIZ~TION:
ADDRESSEE I
ORGANIZATIONI
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 10028~ DATEI 00/00/80
"AERIAL HEAYY METAL POLLUTION AND TERRESTRIAL
IN: ADYANCES IN ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH VOL. II.
A. MACFADYEN, EDITOR. PP. 217-327.
HUGHESt M.K.~ ET AL
~C~DEM!C PRE~S
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDIC~TED
MISCELLANEOUS
PAGES: 1112'
ECOSYSTEMS"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~~
FILE. 20~1702 NUMBER: 100286 DATE: 00/00/83 P~GES: 3~
TlTL£/SU8JECTI IIUPT~KE, TR~NSLOCATION AND PHYTOTOXICITY OF ARSENIC IN
PL~NTS" IN: ARSENIC. W.H. LEDERER AND R.J. FENSTERHEIM,
EDITORS. PP. 348-37~.
ORG~NI~~+7g~; ~~~C~g~9R~~bDR£I~~oEB COMPANY
~ ADDRESSEE: NOT INDIC~TED
ORG~NIZ~TION: NOT INDICATED
OCUMENT TYPE: MISCELLANEOUS ,
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------~
FILE: 20~ 1 702
TITLE/SUBJECT.
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZ~TIONI
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE I
NUMBER: 3001:i:iA
TRANSMITT~L OF SAMPLING
JONES, RICHARD
USEPA-VIII
SMITH CHARLES
CITIZEN(S) OF ANACOND~,
LETTER
DATE. 06/11/86
LOC~TIONS AND RESULTS.
PAGES: 1
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------~
MONTAN~
FILE. 2021703
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTMORI
ORG~N I Z~T I ON I
ADDRESSEE I
ORG~NIZ~TIONI
DOCUMENT TYPE I
NUMBER I 10000~ DATE I 11/14/86 PAGES: 2
REGARDING A REQUEST FOR THE STATE'S ASSESSMENT OF APPLICABLE
OR RELEYANT ~ND APPROPRIATE STATE RE~UIREMENTS FOR THE MILL
CREEK REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION AND FE~SI8ILITY STUDY (RI/FS>.
WARDELL JOHN
USEPA-Y}II, MONTAN~ OFFICE
SCHWINDEN TED
ST~TE OF ~ONTANA, OFFICE OF THE GOYERNOR
LETTER
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONT~NA OPERABLE UNIT
;~~~;~~~===========a======~~~l~!;!:~~r~;=:;;~:~=r~~;:====a============~:S;~=~.'
FILE: 2~217~J ~UMBERs 100008 DATEs 11/26/86 PAGES: 3
TITLE/SUBJECT: A LIST OF APPLICABLE ~ND RELEVANT REQUIREMENTS OF THE
STATE'S SURFACE AND GROUNDWATER NONDEGRADATION POLICY AND
GROUNDWATER CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM TO THE MILL CREEK
SUPERFUND REMEDIAL ACTION.
SHEWMAN FRED
MONTANA'DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
WARDELL JOHN
USEPA-viII, MONTANA OFFICE
LETTER
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCU"'ENT TYPE:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021703
TITLE/SUBJECT.
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORGAN I Z~TION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NU"'BER: 10001~ DATE. 12/18/86 PAGES: 1~
TRANSMITT~L OF THE LISTINGS OF ST~NDARDS ~ND CRITERIA ~
PROVIDED BY THE RESPONSIBLE STATE AGENCIES IN RESPONSE TO A
NOVEMeER 14 1986 REQUEST FOR THE STATE'S ~SSESSMENT OF
~PPLICABLE OR RELEVANT ~ND ~PPROPRIATE REQUIREMENTS FOR
REMEDIAL ACTION AT MILL CREEK.
SCHWINDEN TED
ST~TE OF MONTANA, OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
WARDELL JOHN
USEPA-V~II, MONTANA OFFICE
LETTER
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021703
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZ~TION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 100017A DATE: 03/06/87 PAGES: 2
REGARDING THE ~PPLICABLE OR RELEVANT AND ~PPROPRI~TE
ST~ND~RDS'r LIMITATIONS,. CRITERI~ ~ND REQUIREMENTS OF PROM- .
ULGATED S ~TE OF MONT~NA ENVIRONMENT~L LAWS IN REFERENCE TO
THE MILL CREEK REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION FEASIBILITY STUDY.
REQUESTS ~ MEETING FOR 3/9/87, TO PROVIDE EPA INFORM~TION.
BISHOP MIKE
USEP~-VIII~ MONT~NA OFFICE
JOHNSON HuW~RD .
ST~TE OF MONT~NA, OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
LETTER
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021703
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR.
ORG~NI ZATI ON:
~DDRESSEEs
ORGANIZATION:
DOCU"'ENT TYPEs
NUMBER: 10~~1a DATE: 03/11/87 P~GES: 3
RESPONSE TO MIKE BISHOP'S CONCERNS REGARDING THE MILL CREEK
RI/FS APPLICABILITY OF AIR QU~LITY RULES EXPRESSED IN HIS
MARCH 6L 1987 LETTER.
STERNBERG STAN
MONT~NA DEP~RTMENT OF HEALTH & ENVIRON"'ENTAL SCIENCES
ORR KATHERINE
MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
MEMO
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 2021703
TITLE/SUBJECT.
~UTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
~DDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATIONs
DOCU"'ENT TYPEs
NUMBER. 1~0019
"STATE OF MONTANA ~IR
ROeBINS HAL
MONTANA'DEPARTMENT OF
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MISCELLANEOUS
DATE: 07/00/86
QUALITY RULES"
HEALTH & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
PAGES: 107
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 2021703
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBERt 100020 DATE: 03/1a/87 PAGES: 1
REQUESTING SPECIFIC INFORMATION CONCERNING THE WORKING
~~~I~~~~~NEFO~E~~bi~~C~~~~~'c~~~IE~~~ri"FO~N~I~EPt~~~~IATE",
FEDERAL LAWS REGARDING REMEDIAL ACTIONS FOR MILL CREEk, AND
SPECIFICALLY WORDED LEGAL QUESTIONS.
ORR KATHERINE
MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF H~ALTH & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CALLAWAY REX
USEPA-VI~I, OFFICE OF REGIONAL COUNSEL
LETTER
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONT~N~ OPERA8LE UNIT
~~~~:~~~-------- ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX PAge: =
--------~-------=============================================================
FILE: 20~1703 NUM8ER: 100021 DATE: 04/20/87 PAGES' 1
,TITLE/SU8JECTI TRANSMITTAL OF COPIES OF CAROLE MASSMAN'S LETTER OF APRIL'14
AND THE COMMENTS PROVIDED TO HER FROM VARIOUS DNRC PROGRAM
OFFICERS. (ONE COpy ENCLOSED>
JOHNSON HOWARD '
STATE OF MONTANA, OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
8ISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
LETTER
AUTHOR:
ORGAN I ZAT ION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGAN I ZAT I ON:
DOCUMENT TY PE :
-------------------------------------------------------------------------~----
FILE: 2021703
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORG~N I ZAT I ON:
ADDRESSEE:
ORG~N I ZAT I ON:
DOCUMENT TYPE I
NUMBER: 100022 DATE: 04/14/87 PAGES: 2
TRANSMITTAL OF THE STATE LAW AND RULES WHICH ARE MORE
STRINGENT THAT FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS: CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS
FOR WATER WELLSL FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT REGULATIONS, MINIMUM
STANDARDS FOR STREAMBED PROJECTSL WATER RIGHTS PERMITS, AND
LICENSING OF wELL DRILLERS. (RUL:.S NOT ATTACHED>
MASSMAN, CAROLE
MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES & CONSERVATION
JOHNSON HOWARD
STATE OF MONTANA, OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
MEMO
----------------------------------------------------------------------~--~-~~=
FILE: 2021703
TtTLE/SUBJECT I
~UTHORI
ORGANIZATIONI
~DDRESSEEI
ORGAN I ZAT I ON I
DOCUMENT TY PE :
NUMBER: 100023 DATE I 00/00/00
COMMENTS - STATE REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS
STREAM8EDS WHICH ARE APPLICABLE TO THE MILL
NOT. INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MISCELLANEOUS
PAGES: 1
CONCERNING
CREEK RI/FS.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~-~~
FILE: c:021703
T I TLE/SU8JECT :
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
'ADDRESSEE:
ORGAN I ZAT I ON:
DOCUMENT TY PE :
NUMBER: 100024 DATE: 03/13/87 PAGES: 1
COMMENTS REGARDING FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT REGULATIONS IN
RESPONSE TO EPA'S REQUEST REGARDING THE PROGRAM'S
INVOLVEME~: WITH THE PROPOSED MILL CREE~ SUPERFUND CLEANUP
IN DEER LODGE COUNTY.
HAMILL JOHN
NOT INbICATED
MASSMAN\ CAROLE
NOT INDLCATED
MEMO
----------------------------------------------------------------------------~~
FILE: 2021703
TI TLE/SU8JECT :
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORG~N I Z~T ION:
DOCUMENT TY PE :
NUMBER: 1000~~ DATE: 04/08/87 PAGES: 1
A LIST OF REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS REGARDING THE DRILLING
OF WATER WELLS FOR EPA'S REVIEW OF STATE RE~UIREMENTS WITH
REFERENCE TO THE MILL CREEK REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION AND
FEASreILITY STUDY.
CUTLER DIANA C.
MONTAN~ DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES & CONSERVATION
MASSMAN, CAROLE
MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES & CONSERVATION
MEMO
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 20;21703
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGAN I ZAT I ON:
ADDRESSEE:
!'I0RG~NI ZAT ION:
IJOCUMENT TY PE I
NUMBER: 100026 DATE: 03/19/87 PAGES: 1
A LIST OF THE BOARD OF WATER WELL CONTRACTORS MINIMUM
CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS FOR WATER WELLS RELATIVE TO THE MILL
CREEK REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION AND FEASIBILITY STUDY,
CUTLER DIANA C.
MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES & CONSERVATION
MASSMAN CAROLE
MONTANA'DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES & CONSERVATION
MEMO
----------------------------------------------------~-----------------------~~
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONT~N~ OPER~BLE UNIT
10/01/87 ~DMINISTR~TIVE RECORD INDEX ~~ge: 8~
2-==----==============--=a=====~=======================----=-----------------~
FILE;-2021703 NUMBER: 1000~7 D~TE. 03/30/87- -------PAGES~-l---
TITLE/SUBJECT: RESPONSES TO THE THREE QUESTIONS CONT~INED IN MIKE BISHOP'S
LETTER OF M~RCH 6 1987 REQUESTING INFORMATION ON ST~TE
REQUIREMENTS FOR THE MILL CREEK REMEDI~L INVESTIGATION ~ND
FE~SIBILITY STUDY. THE INFORM~TION ~ROVIDED IS ON WATER
RIGHTS.
GUSE RON~LD J.
MONTAN~ DEP~RTMENT OF N~TUR~L RESOURCES & CONSERV~TION
MASSMAN C~ROLE
MONT~NA'DEP~RTMENT OF N~TUR~L RESOURCES & CONSERV~TION
MEMO
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZ~TION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 2021703
TITLE/SUBJECT.
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZ~TION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER. 1000Z8 DATE. 08/27/87E P~GES: 66
"EVALUATION ~ND IDENTIFIC~TION OF '~PPLICAEtLE OR RELEV~NT
~ND ~PPROPRI~TE' FEDER~L ~ND ST~TE REQUIREMENTS FOR MILL
CREEK MONT~N~, CERCL~ SITE" ~ND TWO ~PPENDICES WHICH
~NALY2E BOTH THE FEDERAL ~ND ST~TE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE
MILL CREEKL MONT~NA SITE.
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDIC~TED
MISCELLANEOUS
-------------~--------------------------------------------------------~-------
FILE: 2021704 NUMBER. 100001 DATE. 12/0~/84 PAGES: 2
TITLE/SUBJECT. SUMMARY OF POINTS OF CONCENSUS CONCERNING COMMUNITY
RELATIONS ~CTIVITIES ~T THE ~NACOND~ SMELTER SITE WHICH
WERE RE~CHED ~T THE MEETING ON NOVEMBER 29, 1984.
ORGANI~~+~g~: ~~~~~~~I~I~EMONT~NA OFFICE
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICA/ED
ORGANIZATION."NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE. MEETING NOTES
----------------------------~------------------------------------------------- ~
FILE. 20Z1704 NUMBER. 100002 DATE. 12/13/84 PAGES: 1
TITLE/SUBJECT. ~N ~GEND~ LISTING THE PRESENT~TIONS TO BE GIVEN BY EP~
MDHES,. SYSTEC, AND ~MC ~T THE ANACOND~ ~DVISORY COUNCIL
MEETING.
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MEETING NOTES
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZ~TION:
~DDRESSEE.
ORGANIZ~TION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEs 20Z1704
TITLE/SUBJECT.
~UTHOR.
ORG~NIZ~TION.
~DDRESSEE.
ORGANIZ~TION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 100003 DATE. 00/00/8~ PAGES: e
"COMMUNITY REL~TIONS PL~N - ~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE -
~N~CONDA MONT~NA"--OUTLINES THE B~CKGROUND (SITE
BACKGROUND COMMUNITY CONCERNS KEY ISSUES) COMMUNITY
RELATIONS OBJECTIVES, ~ND COMMUNITY RELATIONS TECHNIQUES.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDIC~TED
MISCELLANEOUS
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 20~1704
TITLE/SUBJECTs
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZ~TION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORGANIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100004 DATE. 00/00/00 PAGES: 4
"~IR QU~LITY MONITORING EXISTING CONFIGUR~TION" ~ND "~IR
QU~LITY MONITORING NEW CONFIGUR~TION"--M~PS OF S~MPLING
POINTS ~ND T~~LES LISTING THE SITE N~ME MAP LOC~TION,
ST~TE OR COMP~NY RESPONSIBILITY, MONITORING FREQUENCY, ~ND
THE ~IR POLLUTION MEASUREMENTS.
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDIC~TED
M~P/DR~WING/DI~GR~M
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONT~N~ OPER~BLE UNIT
10/01/87 ~DMINIStR~TIVE RECORD INDEX Page: =:
a...a~============z======a__=====================~==--------------------------
FILE: 2021704 NUMBER: 100005 D~TE: 02/Z0/65---------PAGES~-1---
TITLE/SUBJECT: AN AGENDA LISTING THE EPA PORTION OF THE ANACONDA
~UTHOR ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL MEETING.
... : NOT I ND I CATED
ORG~NIZ~TION: NOT INDIC~TED
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
ORG~NIZ~TION: NOT INDIC~TED
DOCUMENT TYPE: MEETING NOTES
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 201:: 1 71214
TI TLE/SUBJECT :
~UTHOR:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TY PE :
NUMBER: 100006
~N ~GENDA LISTING THE
MDHES" ~ND ~MC AT THE
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDIC~TED
MEETING NOTES
D~TE: 01::/1::1/85 PAGES: 1
PRESENTATIONS TO BE GIVEN BY EPA
ANACOND~ ~DVISORY COUNCIL MEETING.
------------------------------------------------------------------------~---~-
FILE: 2021704
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR :
ORG~NIZ~TION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100007 D~TE: 03/21/85 PAGES: 1
~N ~GEND~ LISTING THE PRESENTATIONS TO BE GIVEN BY CDC, EPA,
MDHES~ AMC~ AND THE GOV. ST~FF ~T THE AN~COND~ ADVISORY
COUNClL MEt:.TING.
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDIC~TED
MEFTING NOTES
--------~------------------------------------------------------------------~~~
FILE: 2021704
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
~ORG~NIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 10000S D~TE: 04/0S/SSE P~GES: 1
SUMMARY REPORT ON SITE MONITOR ACTIVITIES - AN~CONDA
DEMOLITION PROJECT FROM APRIL S, 19S5 TO JUNE 21, 1985.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDIC~TED
REPORT/STUDY
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------~
FILE. 2021704
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGAN I ZAT I ON:
DOCUMENT TY PE :
NU~BER: 100009 D~TE: 04/18/SS PAGES: 1
AN ~GEND~ LISTING THE PRESENTATIONS TO BE GIVEN BY EPA
MDHES" ~ND A~C AT THE AN~CONDA ADVISORY COUNCIL MEETING.
NOT INDIC&:\TED
NOT INDIC&:\TED
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDICATED
MEETING NOTES
--------------------------------~--------------------------------------------~
FILE: 2021704
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHO R :
ORG~NI ZAT I ON:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGAN I ZAT I ON:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER. 100010 D~TE: 04/1S/8S PAGES: 2
SUMM~RY MINUTES - EP~ - ADVISORY COUNCIL--TOPICS ADDRESSED
WERE: INTRODUCTION OF THE COMMUNITY REL~TIONS SPECIALISTt
PROGRESS ON HEALtH EFFECTS STUDIES SEWAGE TRE&:\TMENT PLAN
UPD~TE~ W~TER ~UALITY IN THE ALLUVI~L AQUIFER~ UPDATE RI/FS
PROCES~~ DUST CONTROL, AND ON SITE MONITOR RE~ORT.
NOT INDlCATED
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDIC&:\TED
NOT INDIC&:\TED
MEETING NOTES
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------~
-------
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/81 ADMINIStRATIVE RECORD INDEX Page: ,:
-.==------=======._=.=-==...~==.============~...========================------
FILE;-2021104 NUMBER: 100011 DATE: 06/00/85 PAGES~-4--l
TITLE/SUBJECT: "SUPERFUND PROGRAM FACT SHEET - ANACONDA SMELTER SITE"-- ,
CONTAINS AN INTRODUCTION TO SUPERFUND BACKGROUND ON THE
"ANACONDA SMELTER SUPERFUND SITE, INFORMATION ON THE REMEDIAL
INVESIGATION/FEASIBILITY STUDY (RI/FS)~ INFORMATION ON HOW
TO OBTAIN PUBLIC INFORMATION, AND A GLuSSARY OF TERMS USED.
NOT INDICATED
USEPA-VIII~ MONTANA OFFICE
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MISCELLANEOUS
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 20Z1104
TITLE/SU8.1ECTI
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCU/'ItENT TYPE:
NUMBER. 100012 DATE: 06/20/8S PAGES: 3
REGARDING THE EPA'S ANNOUNCEMENT THAT LEVELS OF ARSENIC
FOUND IN CHILDREN'S URINE DURING A RECENT ARSENIC EXPOSURE
STUDY ARE NOT HIGH ENOUGH TO CAUSE IMMEDIATE TOXIC EFFECTS
ALONG WITH AN ATTACHED FACT SHEET WHICH ANSWERS QUESTIONS
ON THE ARSENIC EXPOSURE STUDY.
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIII~ MONTANA OFFICE
NOT INDICA rED
NOT INDICATED
MEMO
------------------------------------------------------------------------------.
FILE. 2021704
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCU/'ltENT TYPE:
NU/'ItBER: 100013 DATE: 06/20/8S PAGES: 1
AN AGENDA AND SU/'ItMARY OF THE ANACONDA/DEER LODGE COUNTY
ENVIRON/'ItENTAL ADVISORY CO/'lt/'ltITTEE MEETING WHICH COVERED ;:"E
TOPICS: HEALTH EFFECTS STUDIES, RI/FS UPDATE~DEVELOPMENT OF
REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES COMMUNITY RELATION ACT1VITIES
CONTENT/FREQUENCY OF ~EETINGS AND ON SCENE MONITOR REPORT.
NOT INDICATED "
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MEETING NOTES
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 20Z1704
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCU/'ItENT TYPEI
NUMBER: 100014 DATE: 07/0g/8S
SUMMARY REPORT ON PRESS BRIEFING AND PUBLIC
REGARDING THE WINTER URINARY ARSENIC STUDYb
MONTANA MARCH 1985. (LIST OF ATTENDEES AN
NOTE FROM THE PRESS>
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MEETING NOTES
PAGES: 3
MEETING
ANACONDA
QUESTIONS OF
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021104
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATIONI
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPEI
NUMBER. 10001S DATE: 07/18/8S PAGES: 1
AN AGENDA LISTING THE EPA PORTION OF THE ANACONDA
ENVIRON/'ItENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL MEETING. TOPICS LISTED:
UPDATE ON THE RI/FS PROCESS PRESENTATION OF THE HEALTH
EFFECTS SOILS DATA REPORT~ COMMUNITY RELATION ACTIVITIES~
ON SCENE MONITOR REPORT, ~ND IMMEDIATE REMOVAL ACTIVITIE=.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MEETING NOTES
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONT~N~ OPER~eLE UNIT
10/01/67 AOMINIStR~TIVE RECORD INDEX Page: ~-
===a================8========---=-=--=~---===--======-------------------------
II~FILE: ~021704 NUMBER: 100016-- --- DATE: 1218/00785---------PAGES~-~---
,TITLE/~UBJECT: "SUPERFUND PROGRAM FACT SHEET - ANACONDA SMELTER SITE"--
INFORMATION ON THE WINTER URINARY ARSENIC SURVEY AND HOW
TO O~TAIN PU~LIC INFORMATION.
NOT INDICATED
USEPA-VIIIt MONTANA OFFICE
NOT INDICA ED
NOT INDICATED
MISCELLANEOUS
~UTHOR:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORG~N I ZAT I ON:
DOCUMENT TY PE :
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021704
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORG~NI ZATION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORGANIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TY PE :
NUMBER: 100017 D~TE: 1218/15/85 PAGES: 5
AN AGEND~ LISTING THE EPA PORTION OF THE ANACONDA
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL MEETING,. AN EPA SUMMARY OF
THE MEETING AND A SUMM~RY REPORT OF THE ON SITE MONITOR
ACTIVITIES OF THE AN~CONDA SMELTER DEMOLITION PROJECT FROM
JUNE 24t 1965 TO JULY 26, 1986.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MEETING NOTES
-------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~~~
FILE: 2021704 NUMBER: 100016 D~TE: 09/19/65 P~GES: 4
TITLE/SUBJECT: AN AGEND~ LISTING THE EPA PORTION OF THE ANACONDA .
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL MEETINGN AN EPA SUMMARY OF
~~~I~~~iE~NgFAT~~M~~~to~B~0~~Ee~E~HBE~OLytTaNMg~6}~~T FROM
JULY 29\ 1965 TO AUGUST 30, 196~.
~UTHORI NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATIONI NOT INDICATED
~DDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZ~TION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: ME~TING NOTES
IJ~:~~-~~~~~~:~-------~::~~~-~~~~~~---------~~~;~-~~~~~~~~---------~~~~~~-~--~
TITLE/SUBJECT: "SUPERFUND PROGRAM FACT SHEET - AN~CONDA SMELTER SITE"--
INFORMATION ON THE ANACONDA SMELTER SITE REMEDIAL
INVESTIG~TION/FEASIBILITY STUDY.
NOT INDICATED
USEPA-VIIIt MONTAN~ OFFICE
NOT INDICA ED
NOT INDICATED
MISCELLANEOUS
~UTHOR:
ORG~NIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~
FILE I 2021704
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTH~I
ORG~N I Z~T I ON I
ADDRESSEE:
DORG~NIZATIONI
OCUMENT TYPE I
NUMBER I 100020 DATE I 10/17/85 PAGES: 4
AN AGENDA LISTING THE EPA PORTION OF THE ANACONDA
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL MEETING,. AN EPA SUMMARY OF
THE MEETING AND ~ SUMMARY REPORT ON THE ON SITE MONITOR
~CTIVITIES OF THE AN~CONDA SMELTER DEMOLITION PROJECT FROM
SEPTEMBER 3~ 1965 TO OCTO~ER 4, 1965.
NOT INDICATeD
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MEETING NOTES
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEr 2021704
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORGANI LATION:
ADDRESSEE:
DORGAN I ZAT I ON:
OCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100021 DATEI 11/04/65E PAGES: 1
SUMMARY REPORT OF THE ON SITE MONITOR ACTIVITIES OF THE
ANACONDA SMELTER DEMOLITION PROJECT FROM NOVEMBER 4, 1985 TO
NOVEMBER 22~ 1985.
NOT INDICATeD
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTAN~ OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/87 ~DMINISTR~TIV.E RECORD INDEX P~g~: g
======================a_=~...==a.=========a-===.========================-----
FILE: 2021704 NUMBER. 100022 D~TE: 10/21/85 PAGES~-~--.
TITLE/SUBJECT. AN AGENDA LISTING THE EPA PORTION OF THE ANACONDA
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL MEETING,. AN EPA SUMMARY OF
THE MEETING AND A SUMMARY REPORT OF THE ON SITE MONITOR
ACTIVITIES OF THE AN~CONDA SMELTER DEMOLITION PROJECT FROM
OCTOBER 10L 1985 TO NOVEMBER 1, 1985.
NOT INDICArED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MEETING NOTES
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORGANIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------~
FILE. 20;:1704
TITLE/SUBJECT.
~UTHOR :
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100023 D~TE: 1a/10/8~ PAGES: 1
A NOTICE THAT THE EPA IS CALLING A SPECIAL COMMUNITY
MEETING FOR TUESDAY DECEMBER 10 TO ALLOW DR. SUE BINDER
TO REVIEW WITH THE PUBLIC THE FINDINGS OF THE SUMMER URINARY
ARSENIC SURVEYl AND AN AGENDA LISTING THE EPA PORTION OF THE
ANACONDA ENVIRuNMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL MEETING.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MEETING NOTES
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: a021704 NUMBER: 100024 D~TE. 12/10/8~ PAGES: 4
TITLE/SUBJECT: "FACT SHEET ON ANACONDA SMELTER SUPERFUND SITE"--INFORMATION
IN A QUESTION AND ANSWER FORMAT INTEDED TO PROVIDE FURTHER
INFORMATION ON PAST AND FUTURE EPA ~CTIONS AT THE ANACONDA
SITE.
~UTHOR: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION: USEPA-VIIILMONTANA OFFICE
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICA rED
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: MISCELLANEOUS
------------------------------------------------------------------------------~
FILE. 2021704 NUMBER: 10002~ DATE: 12/10/8~ PAGES: 10
TITLE/SUBJECT. EPA SUMMARY OF THE ANACONDA/DEER LODGE COUNTy ENVIRONMENTAL
COUNCIL MEETING IN QUESTION AND ANSWER FORMAT USING
QUESTIONS OF NOTE FROM THE PRESS.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MEETING NOTES
AUTHOR:
ORGAN IZAT I ON:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 2021704
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 100026 DATE. 12/20/8~ PAGES: 1
TRANSMITTAL OF A LIST OF HYGIENE MEASURES THAT WOULD HELP
ALL RESIDENTS OF MILL CREEK MINIMIZE THEIR EXPOSURE TO
CONTAMINATED SOILS AND DUST.
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIII'r ~ONTANA OFFICE
NOT INDICA ED
NOT INDICATED
LETTER
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021704
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHO R :
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TyPE:
NUMBER. 100027 DATE: 01/06/86E PAGES, 2
TWO SUMMARY REPORTS OF THE ON SITE MONITOR ACTIVITIES OF THE
ANACONDA SMELTER DEMOLITION PROJECT FROM NOVEMBER 2~~ 1985
TO JANUARY 3, 1986 AND FROM JANUARy 6, 1986 TO FEBRU~RY 7,
1986.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTAN~ OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/87 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX P~ge: ?-
=~=================8.=a===--_~=========--=------a-----------------------------
FILE: 2021704 NUMBER; 100028 -- --DATE:-01/16/86---------PAGES~-1---
ITITLE/SUBJECT: A NOTICE OF A SPECIAL MEETING CALLED BY THE EPA TO DISCUSS
WITH THE RESIDENTS OF MILL CREEK EPA'S CONCLUSIONS
CONCERNING THE POTENTIAL NEED FOR RELOCATION DURING THE
PERIOD PRIOR TO THE PROPOSED SPRING CLEANUP!' AND AN AGENDA
LISTING THE EPA PORTION OF THE ANACONDA ADV SORY MEETING,
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MEETING NOTES
AUTHOR:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------~--
FILE: 2021704
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZ~TI0N:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100029 D~TE: 01/16/86 PAGES: 1
~ NOTICE OF A SPECI~L MEETING FOR THE MILL CREEK RESIDENTS
ONLY TO DISCUSS EPA'S DECISION CONCERNING WHETHER TEMPORARY
RELOCATION OF MILL CREEK RESIDENTS PRIOR TO THE SPRING
CLEANUP IS W~RR~NTEDi AND AN AGENDA LISTING THE EPA PORTION
OF THE ANACONDA ENVI~ONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL MEETING.
NOT INDICATED .
USEP~-VIIIL MONTANA OFFICE
NOT INDICA rED
NOT INDIC~TED
MEETING NOTES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~~,
FILE: 2021704 NUMBER: 100030 D~TE: 01/16/86 PAGES: 1
TITLE/SUBJECT: "FACT SHEET ON AN~COND~ SMELTER SUPERFUND SITE"--DISCUSSES
THE TOPICS OF EPA/AMC FLUE OUST CONSENT ORDER TEMPORARY
RELOCATION OF MILL CREEK RESIDENTS, SPRING CLEAN UP, AND
IMPROVED HOUSEKEEPING.
~UTHOR: NOT INDICATED
ORG~NIZ~TION: NOT INDICATED
~DDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
ORG~NIZATION: NOT INDICATED
,~:~~~~!_!~~~~-~~~:~~~~~~~~~---~---------------------------------------------=
FILE: 2021704 NUMBER: 100031 . DATE: 01/16/86 PAGES: 10
TITLE/SUBJECT: EPA SUMMARY OF A MEETING WITH MILL CREEK RESIDENTS IN
QUESTION AND ANSWER FORM.
AUTHOR: NOT INDIC~TED
ORG~NIZ~TION: NOT INDICATED
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: MEETING NOTES
----------------------------------------------------------------------------~~
FILE: 2021704
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER. 100032 DATE: 01/28/86 PAGES: 1
SUMMARY OF A SPECIAL EAC MEETING--REVIEWED THE INFORMATION
ON MILL CREEK WHICH WAS PROVIDED AT THE JANUARY 16, lS86
PUSLIC MEETING AND DISCUSSED THE MEASURES THE
COUNTY/COMMITTEE SHOULD TAKE lN THIS PROCESS.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MEETING NOTES
~
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------~
FILE: 2021704 NUMBER: 100033 DATE: 02/10/86E PAGES: 1
TITLE/SUBJECT: SUMMARY REPORT OF THE ON SITE MONITOR ACTIVITIES OF THE
ANACONDA SMELTER DEMOLITION PROJECT FROM FEBRUARY l~, 198~
TO MARCH 7L lS86.
AUTHOR: NOT INDICA lED
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
DORGANIZATIONI NOT INDICATED
OCUMENT TYPE: REPORT/STUDY
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------~
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONT~N~ OPER~BLE UNIT
10/01/87 ~DMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX Page: S:
---8--------=-==~====~.========-=====================================---------~
FILE~-2021704- NU~9ER: 100034 D~TE: 02/20/86 P~GES~-2---
TITLE/SUBJECT: EPA SU~M~RY OF THE ANACONDA/DEER LODGE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL
ADVISORY COUNCIL MEETING--TOPICS DISCUSSED WERE THE HUMAN
HE~LTH STUDY, MILL ,CREEK CLEAN UP UPDATE, FLUE DUST,
RI/FS UPDATEb AND COMMUNITY RELATIONS.
NOT INDICATE
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MEETING NOTES
AUTHOR:
ORG~NIZATION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021704
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZ~TION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORGANIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 10003~ DATE: 03/10/86E PAGES: 2
SUMM~RY REPORT OF THE ON SITE MONITOR ~CTIVITIES OF THE
AN~COND~ SMELTER DEMOLITION PROJECT FROM MARCH 10L 1~86 TO
APRIL 4 1986' AND AN AGENDA LISTING THE EPA PORTlON OT THE
ANACONDA ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL MEETING ON APRIL 17,
1 '386.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDIC~TED
REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021704
TITLE/SUB.1ECT:
, AUTHOR:
CRS:\Nt ZA T ION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100036 DATE: 03/27/86
AN ~GENDA LISTING THE EP~ PORTION OF THE AN~CONDA
ENVIRONMENT~L ADVISORY COUNCIL MEETING.
NOT INDICATED
USEPA-VIII~ MONTANA OFFICE
NOT INDICA rED
NOT INDIC~TED
MEETING NOTES
PAGES: 1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021704
T I TLE/SUBJEC'T :
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100037 DATE: 03/27/86 PAGES: 3
EP~ SUMMARY OF THE AN~COND~/DEER LODGE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAl
ADVISORY COUNCIL MEETING--TOPICS DISCUSSED WERE THE HUMAN
HEALTH STUDY. MILL CREEK CLEAN UP UPD~TEL RI/FS UPDATE,
COMMUNITY RELATIONS, ON-SCENE MONITOR REpORT, AND AIR
QUALITY REPORT.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MEETING NOTES
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021704
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100038 DATE: 0~/01/86
"F~CT SHEET - MILL CREEK, MONTANA"--INFORMATION
AND PERMANENT REMOVAL OF RESIDENTS BY THE EP~.
NOT INDICATED.
USEPA-VIII~ MONTAN~ OFFICE
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MISCELLANEOUS
, P~GES: 2
ON TEMPORARY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021704
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100039 DATE: 0~/01/86 P~GES: 2
SUMM~RY OF AN EPA PUBLIC MEETING --A MEETING WAS HELD WITH
THE RESIDENTS OF MILL CREEK AT 6PM AND A PUBLIC MEETING
FOLLOWED AT 7PM, AT WHICH THEY MAINLY DISCUSSED RELOCATION.,
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MEETING NOTES
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTAN~ OPER~8LE UNIT
10/01/67 ~DMINISTR~TIVE RECORD INDEX Page: =:
~================~=a==========================================================
FILE: 2021704 NUMBER: 100040 D~TE: OS/29/86 PAGES: 1
I ~TITLE/SUBJECT: EP~ SUMMARY OF AN EAC MEETING--DISCUSSIONS MAINLY CENTERED
~UTHOR ~ROUND RELOCATION OF MILL CREEK RESIDENTS.
... : NOT INDICATED
ORG~NIZATION: NOT INDICATED
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZ~TION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: MEETING NOTES
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 20~1704
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100041 D~TE: 07/00/66E PAGES: 6
"SUPERFUND PROGRAM FACT SHEET - ANACONDA SMELTER SITE"--
INFORM~TION ON THE MILL CREEK SITE (8ACKGROUND
INVESTIGATIVE STUDY RESULTS EPA ACTION INFORMATION
~V~ILABLE, GLOSSARY OF TERMS, AND PU8LIC CONCERN AND EPA
RESPONSE) .
NOT INDICATED
USEP~-VIII~ MONTANA OFFICE
NOT INDICAtED
NOT INDICATED
MISCELLANEOUS
------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~~=~
FILE: 2021704
TITLE/SUBJECT I
~UTHOR:
ORG~NIZATION:
~DDRESSEEI
ORG~NIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TY PE :
NUMBER: 100042 D~TEI 07/10/66 PAGES: 1
STATING TH~T UNDER THE TERMS OF AN ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER ON
CONSENT ISSUED RECENTLY 8Y THE USEPA\ THE ANACONDA MINERALS
COMPANY H~S ~GREED TO T~KE THE LEAD !N CONDUCTING A THOROUGH
REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND CLEANUP ALTERNATIVES IN
THE COMMUNITY OF MILL CREEK, MONTAN~.
ElISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIII~ MONTANA OFFICE
NOT INDICA rED
NOT INDICATED
MEMO
------------------~---------------------------------------------------------~~
~ILE: 2021704
'ITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORG~N I ZAT I ON:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TY PE :
NUMBER: 100043 D~TE: 07/24/66E PAGES I 1
~GEND~-EP~ PORTION OF QU~RTERLY ANACONDA ENVIRONMENTAL
ADVISORY COUNCIL MEETING.
NOT INDIC~TED
USEPA-VIII~ MONTANA OFFICE
NOT INDICAIED
NOT INDICATED
MEETING NOTES
---------------------------------------------------------------------------~-~
FILE: 2021704
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORG~N I ZAT I ON:
DOCUMENT TY PE :
NUMBER: 100044
"SUPERFUND PROGRAM UPDATE
PU8LIC MEETING TO 8E HELD
OF ~L TERNAT I VES.
NOT INDICATED
USEP~-VIIl
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDIC~TED
MISCELL~NEOUS
D~TE: 0S/00/66 PAGES: 5
-ANACONDA SMEl TER SITE" NOTICE OF
REGARDING THE DRAFT RI/FS. MENTION
---------------------------------------------------------~------------------~~
FILEr 2021704 NUMBER: 100045 D~TE: 10/07/86
TITLE/SUBJECT: TR~NSMITTAL OF DRAFT COMMUNITY RELATIONS PLAN.
AUTHOR: COX MARION
ORGANIZATION: lCF~ INCORPORATED
ADDRESSEE: ERI~SON\ JAMES W.
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDlCATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: MEMO
------------------------------------------------------------~-----------------
PAGES: 1
-------
~NACONDA S~ELTER SITE
~ILL CREEK ~ONT~N~ OPER~BLE UNIT
10/01 /87 ~D~INIStR~TIVE RECORD INDEX Page: c:
-=..-:---================-==z=---=====__aa=-=-=========8================-----
FILE ~ 20a 1 704 NU~BER : 112112112146 D~TE . 10/ 13/ 86E P~GES ;-i,= ~
TITL~/SUBJECT: "PERFORM~NCE OF REMEDI~L RESPONSE ~CTIVITIES ~T UNCONTROLLED'
- H~Z~ROOUS WASTE SITES (REM II). DR~FT COMMUNITY RELATIONS
PLAN. .
SCRIMGEOUR1. DON
REM II REM~DI~L RESPONSE TE~M
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
~UTHOR:
ORG~NIZATION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORGAN I Z~TI ON:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEI 2021704
TITLE/SUBJECT I
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZ~TION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORGANIZ~TIONI
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER. 100046A DATE I 12/19/86
TRANS~ITT~L OF ~0 COPIES OF THE MILL CREEK REMEDI~L
INVESTIGATION REPORT ~ND NOTES LOC~TION OF X-MET
SAMPLE ST~TIONS IN FIGURES 9, 1121, ~ND 11.
BIGHAM GARY N.
TETRA tECH,. INC.
BISHOP MI~E
USEP~-~III, MONT~N~ OFFICE
LETTER
P~GES: 1
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEI 2021704
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATIONI
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCU"'ENT TYPEI
NUMBER I 100047
"MEETING NOTICE" EP~ PUBLIC
RI/FS FOR PUBLIC REVIEW ~ND
NOT INDICATED
USEP~-VIII
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDICATED
MEETING NOTES
DATE I 12/23/86E P~GES: 1
MEETING RELEASING THE MILL CREEK
COMMENT.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------_.
FILE. 202171214
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZATIONI
~DDRESSEE:
ORGANIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER. 100048 DATE: 12/23/86 PAGES. 13
"FACT SHEET-MILL CREEK OPERABLE UNIT" INCLUDES OPTIONS FOR
CORRECTIVE ~CTIONS1.SUMMARY OF REMEDI~L ~CTION ~LTERN~TIVES,
NATURE ~ND EXTENT uF CONT~MINATION.
NOT INDICATED'
USEP~-VIII
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDIC~TED
MISCELL~NEOUS
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021704
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHORI
ORG~NIZ~TION:
~DDRESSEE.
ORG~NIZ~TION:
t:- -UfI'IENT TYPE.
NUMBERs 10121049
REQUEST FOR COfl'lMENTS ON THE
BISHOP fI'IIKE
USEPA-~III,. MONT~NA OFFICE
~SPHOLM\ ~uDREY
NOT IND!CATED
MEMO
DATEs 12/23/86 P~GES: 2
~ILL CREEK, MONT~N~ RI/FS.
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
F _E. 2021704 . NUMBER I 100049~ DATE:
~ ~LE/SUBJECTI "~ILL CREEK RE"'EDI~L INVESTIG~TION
(PUBLIC COMMENT VERSION)
~UTHORI NOT INDIC~TED
. G~NIZ~TIONI ANACOND~ MINER~LS COMP~NY (~MC)
~DDRESSEE. NOT INDIC~TED
ORG~NIZ~TIONI USEP~-VIII
DOCUMENT TYPE: REPORT/STUDY
12/00/86
REPORT"
P~GES: 313
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERA8LE UNIT
10/01/87 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX PagE ~-
=...====2a=====__a_.-=---==8=-==-=------=a~--------------=------==-------- ---
FILE: 2021704 -NUMBER: 100049B---- -OATE;-12/00/S6------ -PAGES~--=~-
TITLE/SUBJECT: "DRAFT FEASIBILITY STUDY REPORTi MILL CREEK, MONTANA,
REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/FEASI8IL TY STUDY." REVISION 2
DECEMBER 1986 (PUBLIC COMMENT VERSION)
NOT INDICATED
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC)
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
AUTHOR:
ORG~NIZATION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZATION:
DOCUMEN T TY PE :
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -
FILE: 2021704
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHO R :
ORG~NIZATION:
. ~DDRESSEE:
ORGAN I ZAT ION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100049C DATE:
REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/FEASI8ILITY
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
12/00/86E PAGES: ..
STUDY REPOR~ SUPPLEMENT
-------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~--
FILE: 2021704
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100049D DATE: 11/26/86E PAGES: ~~
"ATTACHMENT I - APPLICABLE OR RELEVANT AND APPROPRIATE STATE
REQUIREMENTS" AND "ATTACHMENT II - PHYTOTOXICITY STUDIES ANi:
REFERENCES"
NOT INDICATED
STATE OF MONTANA, OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MISCELLANEOUS
-------------------------------------~-----------------------------------~~~~~
FILE: 2021704
TITLE/SUB,JECT:
AUTHOR:
I ~ ORGANIZATION:
, ADDRESSEE I
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TY PE :
NUMBER: 1000~0 DATE: 00/00/00 PAGES: 2
"FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE - HELENA--THE U.S. EPA HAS ANNOUNCED
A PU8LIC COMMENT PERIOD ON PROPOSED SUPERFUND WORK IN MILL
CREEK AT THE ANACONDA SMELTER SITE IN SOUTHWESTERN MONTANA.
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIII~ MONTANA OFFICE
NOT INDICA rED
NOT INDICATED
MEMO
---------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~
FILE: 20:::1704
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 1000:i1
"FOR I~MEDIATE RELEASE
CHILDREN WILL 8E GIVEN
COM~UNITY CONTAMINATED
JONES, RICHARD
USEPA-VIII
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
ME~O
DATE: 00/00/00 . PAGES I 1
- DENVER--FAMILIES WITH SMALL
THE OPPORTUNITY TO MOVE FROM A
WITH ARSENIC AND OTHER METALS. II
----------------------------------------------------------------------------~-
FILE: 20~1704 NUMBER: 1000:i2 DATE: 00/00/00 ~GES: 2
TITLE/SUB,JECT: "FACT SHEET - TEMPORARY RELOCATION OF FAMILIES IN MILL
CREEK,- MONTANA. II
~UTHOR: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: MISCELLANEOUS
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
MIll CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/87 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX Page: gc
=~=-----------===========================.==============================-----:
FILE~-Z021704- NUMBER: 100053 DATE: 01/02/87 PAGES~-l---
TITLE/SUBJECT: TRANSMITTAL OF ORIGINAL TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS OF EPA
MILL CREEK PUBLIC HEARING HELD ON DECEMBER 23, 1986.
AUTHOR: CANDI NORDHAGEN
ORGANIZATION: REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL REPORTER
ADDRESSEE: BISHOP MIKE
ORGANIZATION: USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
DOCUMENT TYPE: LETTER
-------------------------------------------------------------~----------------
FILE: 20;::1704
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 1000~4 DATE: 12/23/86
U.S. EPA PUBLIC HEARING. MILL CREEK OPERABLE
SMELTER SITE - TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS.
CANDI NORDHAGEN
REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL REPORTER
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
COURT DOCUMENT
PAGES: 42
UNIT ANACONDA
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021704
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 1000~5 DATE. 04/14/87
TRANSMITTAL OF MEMORANDUM FROM THE ATSDR CONCERNING
URINARY ARSENIC SURVEY THAT INVOLVED RELOCATED MILL
RESIDENTS.
BISHOP, MIKE
USEPA-VIII~ MONTANA OFFICE
NOT INDICA rED
NOT INDICATED
MEMO
PAGES: 1
THE
CREEK
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 2021704
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER: 1000~6 DATE. 04/0g/87 PAGES: ;2
TRANSMITTAL OF MEMO FROM DR. BINDER CONCERNING THE PRE- AND
POST-MOVE URINARY ARSENIC LEVELS FOR THE CITIZENS OF MILL
CREEK.
MCGEEHIN MICHAEL
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
MEMO
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 2021704
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR I
ORGANIZATIONI
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 1000~7 DATE I 03/03/87
DISCUSSION OF MILL CREEK PRE- AND POST-MOVE
LEVELS.
~~~g~~~E~¥EO~MH~~LTH & HUMAN SERVICES
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MEMO
PAGES: 2:
URINARY ARSENIC
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021705
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE I
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER. 100001 DATE I 02/11/86 PAGES: 1
CONFIRMING TELEPHONE DISCUSSIONS REGARDING THE LETTER DATED
FEBRUARY 7 1986 IN REFERENCE TO OILING ROADS IN THE MILL
CREFK AREA: ANACONDA VIEWS THE OILING AS AN INTERIM MEASURE
AND A COST EFFECTIVE MEANS OF EVALUATING THE SUCCESS OF A
PATHWAY INTERRUPTER AND WILL SEEK A LONGER TERM SOLUTION.
WINDORSK I J. C.
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC>
BIFOSS R. BEN
CITY-COUNTY MANAGER, ANACONDA-DEER LODGE COUNTY
LETTER
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/67 ADMINISTRATIVE.RECORD INDEX Page: 17~
=~=..==============-------=--=--======------------==----- -----------------
FILE: Z021705 --NUM9ER7-100001A ------DATE~-06/30/85===------PAGES~-~---
TITLE/SUBJECT: ADDRESSING ANACONDA'S POSITION AFTER THE 8/28/85 MEETING
CONCERNING THE EPA'S DRAFT ADMINISTRATIVE CONSENT ORDER ON
THE SMELTER SITE SO THAT THERE WILL BE NO MISUNDERSTANDINGS
AND THAT EPA'S EFFORTS CAN BE FACILITATED IN COMING UP WIT~
A SECOND DRAFT ON THE AGREEMENT.
TILMAN RAY
ANACONCA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC)
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
LETTER
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 20:::170~
T ITLE/SUBJECT :
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TY PE :
NUMBER: 100002 DATE: 05/13/66 PAGES: 2
TRANSMITTAL OF A LIST OF ITEMS THE EPA AND ANACONDA MINERALS
COMPANY AGREED TO PROVIDE EACH OTHER OVER THE COURSE OF THE
NEXT FEW WEEKS WHICH WERE DISCUSSED AT THE MILL CREEK RI/FS
MEETING HELD ON MAY 7TH. (LIST INCLUDED)
DOLE STEPHEN E.
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC)
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
LETTER
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~~
FILE: 202170~ NUMBER: 100003 DATE: 0~/26/66 PAGES: 1
TITLE/SUBJECT: REGARDING ANACONDA COMPANY'S USE OF OIL AS A DUST
~~~~R~a~~~+ t~ +~~ S~~~R~~~~~ ~~E~EAe~~ ~N~I~~V?~O~~~~T~eEY
SCIENCES PRIOR TO THE USE OF OIL.
ORGANI~~+~g~; ~a~~~~~NbEgA~~MENT OF HEALTH & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
ADDRESSEE: HALLER PETER H.
ORGANIZATION: KARR~ TUTTLE, KOCH, CAMPBELL, MAWER, MORROW & SAX
DOCUMENT TYPE: LETT~R
~~~~~-~~~~~~~--------:~:;~~~-~~~~~~---------~~~~~-~~~~~~~~---------~~~~~~-~---
TITLE/SUBJECT: ADVISING THAT THE ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY COMPLETED THE
INITIAL APPLICATION OF DUST SUPPRESSANT TO THE ROADSl
ALLEYS, LANES AND DRIVEWAYS ON JUNE 20~ 1966, AND A 1ST
OF AMC'S EFFORTS TO OBTAIN PERMISSION uF THE
LANDOWNERS TO APPLY THE SUPPRESSANT TO THEIR PROPERTY.
DAV I S JACK R.
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC)
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
LETTER
AUTHOR:
ORGAN IZAT I ON:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 20Z170~
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TY PE :
NUMBER: 100006 DATE: 06/20/66 PAGES: 1
REGARDING THE COMPLETION OF THE DUST SUPPRESSION ACTIVITY
ON THE ROADS AND DRIVEWAYS IN THE MILL CREEK AREA BY
ANACONDA-DEER LODGE COUNTY UNDER CONTRACT TO THE ANACONDA
MINERALS COMPANY.
BIFOSS R. BEN
CITY-COUNTY MANAGER, ANACONDA-DEER LODGE COUNTY
DAVIS JACK R.
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC)
LETTER
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/87 ADMINIStRATIVE RECORD INDEX P~ge:10
-.=------------------.--====~==========================================-------
FILE~-2021705--------NUMBER: 100006A DATE: 07/2~/86 PAGES~-85--
TITLE/SUBJECT: "INITIAL ALTERNATIVES SCREENING DOCUMENT - MILL CREEK,
MONTANA. - REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/FEASIBILITY STUDY"--
REMEDIAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES.
NOT INDICATED.
DAMES 6. MOORE
NOT INDICATED
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC>
REPORT/STUDY
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
--------------------------------------------------~---------------------------
FILE: Z0Z170~
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100006B DATE: 07~00/86 PAGES: 74
"AN ANALYSIS OF THE POTENTIAL FOR AIRBORNE RECONTAMINATION
OF MILL CREEK, MONTANA FROM THE RESUSPENSION, TRANSPORT AND
DEPOSITION OF SURFACE SOIL ARSENIC FROM THER ANACONDA
SMELTER SITE"
NOT INDICATED
MCVEHIL-MONNETT ASSOCIATES
NOT INDICATED
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC)
REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 20~1705
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUrwtENT TYPE:
NUrwtBERt 100006C DATE: 07/30/86 PAGES:
TRANSMITTAL OF INITIAL ALTERNATIVE SCREENING DOCUMENT~ AN
ANALYSIS OF AIRBORNE RECONTAMINATION POTENTIAL & A TuPO-
GRAPHIC MAP OF MILL CREEK (NOT ATTACHED>" AS REQUIRED UNDER
EPA ADMIN. ORDER ON CONSENT. CONFIRMS E~TENSION FOR DELIv-
ERY OF A REPORT IDENTIFYING BACKGROUND METAL CONCENTRATIONS.
DOLE STEPHEN E.
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (ArwtC>
NOT INDICATED
USEPA-VIII
LETTER
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 202170~
TITLE/SUB.1ECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUrwtENT TYPE:
~ ~
NUrwtBER: 100006D DATE: 08/01/86 PAGES:
CONTAINS PROGRESS REPORT NO.1 COVERING THE MONTH OF
JULY 1~86.
DAV IS JACK R.
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC)
WARDELL JOHN
USEPA-V~II, MONTANA OFFICE
LETTER
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 20~170~
TITLE/SUBJECTr
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUrwtENT TYPE:
NUrwtBER: 100006E DATE: 08/01/86 PAGES:
NOTIFICATION THAT JACK R. DAVIS AND STEPHEN E. DOLE HAVE
BEEN DESIGNATED PROJECT LEADER AND ALTERNATE, RESPECTIVELY.
DAVIS JACK R.
ANACONDA MINERALS COrwtPANY (ArwtC>
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
LETTER
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEr 202170~
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATIONr
DOCUrwtENT TYPE:
NUrwtBER: 100006F DATE: 08/08/86 PAGES.
NOTIFICATION THAT MIKE BISHOP AND DOUG SKIE HAVE BEEN
DESIGNATED AS PROJECT LEADER AND ALTERNATE LEADER,
RESPECT I VEL Y. (YELLOW TISSUE COPY.)
DUPREY,. ROBERT L.
USEPA-vIII
DAV I S JACK R.
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC>
LETTER .
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/67 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX P~ge:ll~
==a~====82============--=-_.==============--=-=--=-----=======----~-----------
FILE: 2021705 NUMBER: 100007 --DATE~ 08/14/66 ---- PAGES~-l-~-
TITLE/SUBJECT: TRANSMITTAL OF AN INDEPENDENT APPRAISER'S REVIEW OF THE
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE'S APPRAISALS OF THE MILL CREEK
PROPERTIES, AND A SUGGESTION THAT FOR THE PURPOSE OF THE
RI/FS, THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE'S VALUES SHOULD BE USED.
DAV I S JACK R.
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC>
LAMB JERRY
DAMES & MOORE
LETTER
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 202170~
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER: 100006 DATE. 06/13/66 PAGES: ~
REGARDING THE REVIEW OF THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE APPRAISALS
OF THE MILL CREEK SUBDIVISION. AUTHOR FEELS VALUES ARE ON
THE HIGH SIDEt BUT THEY ARE CONSISTENT AND UNIFORM.
LETTER
-------------------------------------------------------------------------~~=~~
FILE: 202170~
TITLE/SUBJ'ECT.
AUTHOR:
ORGAN IZAT I ON.
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER. 100006A DATE. 06/20/66
CONFIRMATION THAT ALL RI/FS REPORTS AND SUBSEQUENT
WILL BE WRITTEN IN SUCH A WAY THAT THE REPORT DOES
IDENTIFY PERSONAL CHARACTERISTICS.
DAVIS JACK R.
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC>
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
LETTER
PAGES:
REPORTS
NOT
1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~~
FILE: 2021 70~
I~TITLE/SU8JECT .
AUTHOR:
ORG~NIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER. 10000~ DATE. 06/22/66 PAGES: 14
LETTER CONCERNING EPA'S RESPONSE TO ANACONDA ~INERALS
COMPANY'S: INITIAL ALTERNATIVES SCREENING DOCUMENT FOR MILL
CREEK; ANALYSIS OF THE POTENTIAL FOR AIRBORNE RECONTAMIN-
ATION OF MILL CREEK; BACKGROUND AS~CD~& PB CONCENTRATIONS IN
SOIL~WATER & AIR; AND MILL CREEK MuNT~NA RIfFS TOPO. MAP
DUPR~Y, ROBERT L.
USEPA
DAV I S JACK R.
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC)
LETTER
----------------------------------------------------------------------------~~
FILE. 202170~
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGAN I ZAT I ON.
DOCUMENT TY PE .
NUMBER: 10000SA DATE: 0~/06/e6
TRANSMITTAL OF ANACONDA RESPONSE TO EPA'S LETTER
AUGUST 22 1~66 REGARDING THE MILL CREEK IASD
RECONTAMINATION AND BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS.
DAVIS JACK R.
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY CAMC)
DUPREY,. ROBERT L.
USEPA-vIII
LETTER
PAGES:
DATED
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------~
FILE: 2021705 NUMBER: 10000SB DATE. 00/00/00 PAGES: 71
TITLE/SUBJECT: "ANACONDA RESPONSE TO EPA COMMENTS ON THE MILL CREEK IASD,
RECONTAMINATION AND BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS" (INITIAL
ALTERNATIVE SCREENING DOCUMENT>
AUTHOR: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION: ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC>
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE. REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
-MILL CREEK MONT~N~ OPER~BLE UNIT
10/01/87 ~DMINISTR~TIVE RECORD INDEX Page:1~:
---:-------============--==========================================-----------~
FILE~-z0217~5 NUMBER: 10000gC D~TE: 09/16/86E PAGES~-35a-
TITLE/SUBJECT: ~NACONDA DRAFT RI/FS M~TERIALS WITH EPA HANDWRITTEN COMMENTS
WHICH WERE PROVIDED TO ANACONDA IN HANDWRITTEN FORM ~T A
MEETING ON SEPTEMBER 16\ 1986 IN DENVER, COLORADO. PACKAGE
INCLUDES A MEMO ANNOUNCiNG THE MEETING~ COPIES OF THE
OVERVIEWS FROM THE MEETING, AND ATTENDHNCE SHEET.
NOT INDICATED
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY CAMC)
NOT INDICATED
USEPA-VIII~ MONTANA OFFICE
REPORT/STUuY
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 202170~
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100009D DATE. 0g/10/8£E PAGES: 2
REGARDING THE REVIEW OF "AN~LYSIS OF THE POTENTIAL FOR
AIRBORNE RECONTAMINATION OF MILL CREEK, MONTANA FROM THE
RESUSPENSION, TRANSPORT AND DEPOSITION OF SURFACE SOIL
~RSENIC FROM THE ANACONDA SMELTER SITE." IN CONCLUSION HE
FINDS THE ARSENIC PROBLEM IN AND ~ROUND MILL CREEK SERIOUS.
NOTAR, JOHN
USEPA-VIII
BISHOP MIKE.
USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
MEMO
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 202170~
TITL..EfSUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGAN IZ~T I ON:
~DDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100009E DATE: 0g/11/86 P~GESI
CONFIRM~TION OF DELIVERY VI~ TELEF~X SEPTEMBER 10, 1986 OF
THE FOLLOWING DR~FT SECTIONS OF THE MILL CREEK RI/FS:
(1) PUBLIC HE~LTH CONCERNS, ~ND (2) DEEP TILL PILOT STUDY.
D~v I S, J~CK R.
ANACOND~ MINERALS COMP~NY C~MC)
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIII, MONT~N~ OFFICE
LETTER
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 202170~
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZ~TION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100010 DATE: 0g/18/86 P~GES: 3
A LIST CONFIRMING ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY'S UNDERSTANDING
OF EPA'S VER8AL COMMENTS RESULTANT FROM THE PRESENTATION.
MEETING OF SEPTEM~ER 16, 1986 IN DENVER.
D~VIS JACK R.
ANACOND~ MINERALS COMP~NY CAMC)
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIII, MONT~NA OFFICE
LETTER
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 202170~
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORGANIZ~TION.
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100010A DATEs 0g/00/86E PAGES: 283
"MILL CREEK REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION REPORT" CFINAL DRAFT
REPORT - DOCUMENT CONTROL NO. TTB 16g FO)
NOT INDICATED
TETRA TECHt INC.
NOT INDICA ED
~NACONDA MINERALS COMPANY CAMC)
REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 202170~
TITLE/SUBJECT I
~UTHORs
ORGANIZATIONs
~DDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATIONI
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 1000108
"DR~FT FEASI8ILITY STUDY
REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION"
NOT INDIC~TED
DAMES & MOORE
NOT INDICATED
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY
REPORT/STUDY
DATE: 10/02/86 PAGES: 215
REPORT - MILL CREEK, MONTANA -
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CAMC)
-------
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/87 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX Page: 1(
s:===================-----=========-----------===----------------------------
~FILE: 2021705 NUMBER: 100011---------DATE:-09/25/86---------PAGES~-5--
,TITLE/SUBJECT: REGARDING ADDITIONAL CLARIFICATIONS TO THE ISSUES DISCUSSED
AT THE SEPTEMBER 16TH EPA/AMC MEETING IN DENVER AND EPA'S
AUGUST a2ND LETTER REQUESTING CHANGES TO THE DRAFT RIfFS FOR
MILL CREEK,. MONTANA, ETC.
8ISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIII,. MONTANA OFFICE
DAVIS JACK R.
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY CAMC)
LETTER
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 202170~
TITLE/SUB.JECT.
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TY PE I
NUMBER I 100011A DATE: 10/14/86
SUMMARY OF STATEMENTS M. BISHOP MADE BY TELEPHONE
OCTOBER g~ AND RESPONSES THERETO.
DAV IS JAl,;K R.
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC>
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
LETTER
PAGES:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------~~-~=
FILE. 202170~
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TY PE .
NUMBER: 100011B DATE I 12/02/86E PAGES: 2~6
"DRAFT FEASIBILITY STUDY REPORT - MILL CREEK MONTANA-
REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/FEASIBILITY STUDY" (REVISION 1)
NOT INDICATED
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC>
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
-------------------------------------------------------------------------~-~~~
FILE. 20~170~
TITLE/SUBJECT I
t
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 10001a DATE I 10/21/86 P~GES: 1
TRANSMITTAL OF A MEMORANDUM FROM RICHARD CHEATHAM THAT
DETAILS INFORMATION THAT IS NEEDED TO VERIFY THAT THE
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY PERFORMED SAMPLING/ANALYTICAL
PROCEDURES ACCORDING TO THE ~NACONDA SMELTER QUALITY
ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN AND LAB ANALYTICAL PROTOCOL.
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIII,. MONTANA OFFICE
DAVIS JACK R.
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY CAMC)
LETTER
---------------------------------~----------------------------------------~~~~
FILEI 20;::170~
TITLE/SUBJECT I
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TY PE .
NUMBER: 100013 DATE: 10/20/86 P~GES: 3
TWO LISTS PRESENTING DEFICIENCIES WITH RESPECT TO QAPP AND
LAP PROJECT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE MILL CREEK, MONTANA RI/FS
DATABASE FOR WHICH TETRA TECH IS TO PROVIDE SPECIFIC
DETAILED DOCUMENTATION THAT THE PROCEDURES HAVE OR HAVE NOT
BEEN PERFORMED AND THAT QA/QC REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN MET.
CHEATHAM, RICHARD
CCJA
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
MEMO
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021 70~
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TY PE :
NUMBER I 100014 DATE I 10/31/86 P~GES: 2
TRANSMITTAL OF EPA'S COMMENTS ON THE ANACONDA MINERALS COMP-
ANY'S (AMC) DRAFT REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION CRI) AND FEASI8IL-
ITY STUDY (FS) REPORTS. ALSO DISCUSSION OF AMC NOT MEETING
THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ORDER AND THE WORK PLAN TO NOT COM-
MENT ON CLEMENT ASSOC.S CEA) UNTIL THE PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD
DUPREY, ROBERT L.
USEPA-VIII
KRA8LIN RICHARD
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY CAMC)
LETTER
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------~
-------
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/87 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX P~ge:l~
--===========================a=======a======-=..=====================-------- I
FILE: 2021705 NUMBER: 100015 DATE: 10/31/86E PAGES~-~4~
TITLE/SUBJECT: REPORT ENTITLED: I. GENERAL COMMENTS ON DRAFT RI REPORTL II. I
SPECIFJC COMMENTS ON DRAFT RI REPQRT FOR MILL CREEK Mr.
PLUS APPENDICES OF XRF ANALYSES AND PHYTOTOXICITY DATA. I
NOT INDICATED
USEPA
NOT INDICATED
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY CAMC)
REPORT/STUDY
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 20~170~
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100015A DATE: 11/07/86 PAGES: 2
INDICATING THAT ANACONDA CANNOT RESPOND TO THE EPA'S
COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT RI/FS AND INCORPORATE THEM INTO THE
RI AND FS DOCUMENTS BEFORE THE DEADLINE OF NOVEMBER 17 DUE
TO FIVE REASONS WHICH ARE LISTED. ANACONDA ANTICIPATES A
DELIVERY DATE OF DECEMBER 2, 1986.
DAVIS JACK R.
ANACONDA ~INERALS COMPANY (AMC)
WARDELL JOHN
USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
LETTER
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 202170~
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZAT ION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100016 DATE: 11/11/86 PAGES: 2
DISCUSSES TWO PROBLEMS: SYSTEMATIC AND PRECISIONAL ERRORS
IN SAMPLE LOCATIONS IN THE DATA SET. AND THE PLACING OF
SAMPLE LOCATIONS ON THE OLD MILL VIEW PLOT MAP WHICH WAS
DRAWN WITH LESS ACCURACY (1:400) THAN THAT OF THE MILL CREEK
RI/FS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP (1:100). RECOMMENDS SOLUTIONS.
BIGHAM GARY N.
TETRA TECH,. INC.
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
LETTER .
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 202170~
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100017 DATE: 11/12/86 PAGES: 2
REGARDING CLARIFICATIONS REQUIRED BEFORE TE-RA TECH CAN
FINALIZE THEIR REVISIONS OF THE RISK ASSESS;1ENT .SECTIONS OF
THE MILL CREFK RI/FS WHICH ARE BASED ON EPA'S COMMENTS ON
DRAFT MILL CREEK RI/FS AND ON CLEMENT ASSOCIATES (1986>
ENDANGERMENT ASSESSMENT FOR MILL CREEK.
BIGHAM GARY N.
TETRA TECH,. INC.
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
LETTER
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 20~170~
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE.
ORGAN IZ AT I ON.
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER. 100018 DATE: 11/12/86 PAGES: 6~
REGARDING THE EPA'S COMMENTS ON AMC'S DRAFT RI AND FS .
REPORTS AND AMC'S INTENT TO REVISE THE DRAFT RI/FS IN
ACCORDANCE WITH EPA'S DIRECTION. (EPA'S COMMENTS ARE
ATTACHED)
DAVIS JACK R. .
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC)
WARDELL JOHN
USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
LETTER
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~NACONDA SMELTER SITE
- MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
1111111*/01/87 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX PC\ge: 1~':.
================:====------========-----------~======-----------------------
LE: 2021705 NUMBER;-100018A -------OATE: 11/14/00---------PAGES~----:
ITLE/SUBJECTI POST-IT NOTE: ORIGINAL LETTER MAILED CERTIFIED MAIL
~UTHOR N101/14/86. CCs NOT DISTRI8UTED.
"" : T INDICATED
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
-DOCUMENT TYPE: HANDWRITTEN NOTES
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE I 20c: 170~
TITLE/SUBJECT I
~UTHOR:
ORGAN I Z~TION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGAN I Z~T I ON:
DOCUMENT TY PE :
NUMBER: 1000188 DATE: 11/14/86
CERTIFIED LETTER GRANTING ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY
TWO-WEEK EXTENSION FOR SUBMISSION OF THE MILL CREEK
REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/FEASIBILITY STUDY.
DUPREY,. R08ERT L.
USEPA-vIII
DAVIS JACK R.
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC>
LETTER
PAGES:
A
....
-------------------------------------------------------------------------~-~~~
....... FILE: 20c:170~
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORGANI ZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGAN I ZATION:
DOCUMENT TY PE :
NUMBER I 100018C DATE: 11/14/86 PAGES:
CERTIFIED LETTER GRANTING ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY
A TWO-WEEK EXTENSION FOR SUBMISSION OF THE MILL CREEK
REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/FEASIBILITY STUDYo (YELLOW
TISSUE COPY. >
DUPREY, ROBERT L.
USEPA-VIII
DAVIS JACK R.
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC>
LETTER
..:;,
---------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~
iIl.EI 202170~
.TLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZAT I ON:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGAN I ZATION:
DOCUMENT TY PE I
NUMBER: 100019 D~TEz 11/19/86 PAGES: 3
CLARIFYING THREE ISSUES RAISED IN A NOVEMBER 12~ 1986 LETTER
FROM MR. GARY BIGHAM. THE CLARIFICATION WAS NE~DED IN ORDER
TO FINALIZE THE RISK ASSESSMENT SECTIONS OF THE RI/FS.
WARDELL JOHN
USEPA-V~II,. MONTANA OFFICE
DAVI S JACK R.
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC>
LETTER
----------------------------------------------------------------------------~~
FILE: 2021705
TITLE/SUBJECT I
AUTHOR:
ORGAN I ZAT I ON:
ADDRESSEE I
ORGAN I Z~T I ON I
DOCUMENT TY PE I
NUMBER: 100020 D~TEI 11/19/86E PAGES: 6
IDENTIFYING AREAS WHERE MISUNDERSTANDINGS HAVE OCCURRED
OR WHERE CLARIFICATION IS NEEDED IN RESPONSE TO THE
NOVEM8ER 1C:~ 1986 LETTER CONCERNING EPA'S OCT08ER 31,
1986 COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT MILL CREEK RIfFS.
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIII,. MONTANA OFFICE
DAVIS JACK R.
ANACOND~ MINERALS COMPANY (AMC>
LETTER
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------~
FILE I 20c: 1705
TITLE/SUBJECT I
~UTHORz
ORGAN I ZAT I ON:
ADDRESSEE:
DORGAN I ZAT I ON:
OCUMENT TY PE :
NUMBER: 100021 DATEz 11/20/86E PAGES: 1
TRANSMITTAL OF A TOPOGRAPHIC MAP (NOT ATTACHED) OF MILL
CREEK WHICH SHOWS THE APPROXIMATE SAMPLING LOCATIONS FOR THE
SURFACE AND PROFILE SAMPLES COLLECTED BY EPA IN FEBRUARY
AND APRIL 1986, RESPECTIVELY, AT THE MILL CREEK SITE.
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIII~ MONTANA OFFICE
BIGHAM GAHY N.
TETRA TECH, INC.
LETTER
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/87 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX P~ge:1Z
=============================~==~==z=====================~=================== -
FILE: 202170~ NU~BER: 1000Z2 DATE: 12/01/66 PAGES: 1
TITLE/SUBJECT: TRANSMITTAL OF THE REVISED DRAFT RI/FS REPORTS (NOT I
ATTACHED> WHICH ANACONDA 8ELIEVES MEETS ALL OF THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER AND OF EPA'S
DIRECTIVES, AND DISCUSSION OF DISCLAIMERS.
DAV I S JACK R.
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC>
WARDELL JOHN
USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
LETTER
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021705
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100023 DATE: 12/01/86E PAGES: 1
A DISTRIBUTION LIST OF THE DRAFT MILL CREEK RI AND FS.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MISCEl.LANEOUS
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021705
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 1000Z4 DATE: 11/28/66 PAGES: 1
TRANSMITTAL OF 20 COPIES OF THE FINAL MILL CREEK RI REPORT
(NONE ATTACHED> WHICH WAS PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
DIRECTION PROVIDED BY THE U.S. EPA IN THE MILL CREEK WORK
PLAN~ ALSO DISCUSSION OF DISCLAIMER.
BIGHHM GARY N.
TETRA TECH,. INC.
DOLE STEPHEN E.
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC>
LETTER
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
FILE: 202170~
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 10002~ DATE: 00/00/00 PAGES: 1
A DISCLAIMER WHICH STATES THAT DAMES & MOORE IS NOT
RESPONSIBLE FOR THE OPINIONS AND CONCLUSIONS CONTAINED IN
THE FEASIBILITY STUDY AND ITS INVOLVEMENT IN THE PREPARATION
OF THE REVISED DRAFT REPORT IN NO WAY CONSTITUTES AN
ENDORSEMENT OR A RECOMMENDATION.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MISCELLANEOUS
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
FILE: 20;:170~
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION,
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER. 10002~A DATE: 1~/00/86E PAGES: 297
"DRAFT FEASIBILITY STUDY REPORT - MILL CREEK MONTANA-
REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/FEASIBILITY STUDY" (REVISION ~>
NOT INDICATED
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC>
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 202170~
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATIONs
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 1000;:6 DATE: 12/01/86 PAGES: 153
"COMMENTS ON ENDANGERMENT ASSESSMENT: MILL CREEK MONTANA
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE"--ANACONDA STRONGLY DISAGREES WITH
THE EA FINDINGS THAT HEALTH RISKS RESULTING FROM EXPOSURE TO
As,.Cd, & Pb PRESENT A SU8STANTIAL ENDANGERMENT TO THE RESI-
DENTS OF MILL CREEK. (ALSO DRAFT (PE> IN ATTACHMENT 2>
NOT INDICATED
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC>
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERA8LE UNIT
10/01/87 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX P~ge: :2=
==~-~.================-============------~---======-----------====----------~-
FILE: 2021705 NUMBER: 100026A----- --CATE: 02/~4/87---- -PAGES~-:---
TITLE/SUBJECT: TRANSMITTAL OF FIVE COPIES OF ATTACHMENT 3 (NOT ~TT~CHED)
OF ANACONDA'S COMMENTS TO THE MILL CREEK RIfFS WHICH EPA
PRESENTED TO THE PUBLIC ON DECEMBER 23, 1986.
DOLE STEPHEN E.
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC)
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
LETTER
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
~RGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEI 2021705
TITLE/SUBJECT I
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 1000268 DATE: 12/23/86
ERRATA TO "COMMENTS ON ENDANGERMENT ASSESSMENT:
MONTANA" ANACONDA SMELTER SITE"
NOT INDLCATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MISCELLANEOUS
PAGES: 1
MILL CREEK,
----------------------------------------------------------------------~--~~~~-
FILEI 2021705
TITL.E/SUBJECTI
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATIONs
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100027 DATE: 12/16/86E PAGES: 11
EXPRESSING CONCERNS THAT HAVE NOT BEEN ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED
IN AMC'S RESPONSES IN THE REVISED DRAFT RI/FS OR THAT HAVE
RISEN AS A RESULT OF CHANGES THAT HAVE BEEN MADE IN THE
RI/FS BY AMC. EPA'S REQUESTED CHANGES WERE GENERALLY MADE
IN THE TEXT~ BUT THERE ARE PROaLEMS WITH CONSISTENCY.
B I SHOP I'll K~
USEPA-VIII,. MONTANA OFFICE
DAVIS JACK R.
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC)
LETTER
---------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~
FILE: 202170~
TITL.E/SUBJECTI
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGI=INIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100028 DI=ITEI 12/19/86 PAGES: 2
REGARDING ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY'S a~SIS FOR DISAGREEMENT
WITH THE CLEMENT ENDANGERMENT ASSESSMENT FINDINGS THAT
HEALTH RISKS RESULTING FROM EXPOSURE TO ARSENIC'r CADMIUM,
AND LEAD PRESENT A SUBSTANTIAL ENDANGERMENT TO HE
RESIDENTS OF MILL CREEK.
DAV I S JACK R.
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC)
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
LETTER
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~-
FILEI 202170~
TITLE/SUBJECT I
AUTHORs
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE I
ORGANIZATIONI
DOCUMENT TYPEs
NUMBER: 100029 DATE I 12/19/86E PAGES: 1
"ANACONDA STATEMENT REGARDING THE MILL CREEK ENDANGERMENT
ASSESSMENT"--INDICATES ANACONDA'S RESULTS OF THEIR REVIEW OF
THE ENDANGERMENT ASSESSMENT FOR MILL CREEK MONTANA BY
ICF-CLEMENT~ AND RAISES SERIOUS QUESTIONS AS TO THE VALIDITY
OF THE ASSE~SMENT.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MISCELLANEOUS
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 202170~ NUMBER: 100030 DATE: 12/31/86 PAGES: 3
TITLE/SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO EP~'S LETTER OF DECEMBER 16, 1986 ~HICH REQUESTEJ
A LETTER EXPLAINING THE EXTENT TO WHICH ANACONDA MINER~LS
COMPANY RESPONDED TO THE EPA COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT RIfFS.
~UTHORs DAVIS JACK R.
ORGI=INIZATION: ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC)
ADDRESSEE: BISHOP MIKE
ORGANIZATION: USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
DOCUMENT TYPE: LETTER
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONT~N~ OPERABLE UNIT
1121/1211 /67 ~DMINISTR~T IVE RECORD INDEX Pilge: 10'
8=============8a=~=~~==s========-============================================:
FILE: 21212171215 NUMBER: 100030A DATE: 12/31/66 PAGES:
TITLE/SUBJECT: PROGRESS REPORT NO.6 COVERING THE MONTH OF DECEMBER 1966.
~UTHQR: DAVIS, ~ACK R.
ORGANIZATION: ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC>
ADDRESSEE: WARDELL JOHN
ORGANIZATION: USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
DOCUMENT TYPE: LETTER
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
FILE: 20~170~
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 112112112131 DATE: 01/12/67 PAGES: 2
TRANSMITTAL OF EPA'S ADDENDUM TO THE MILL CREEK REMEDIAL
INVESTIGATION/FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR CONSIDERATION DURING
THE PUBLIC COMMENT PERIODL AND ALSO COPIES OF REFERENCES
FROM THE ENDANGERMENT ASS~SSMENT WHICH WERE REQUESTED.
(NEITHER ARE ATTACHED>
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-~III,. MONTANA OFFICE
DAV I S JACt'. R.
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC>
LETTER
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------~
FILE: 202170~
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR:
ORGAN IZ AT ION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: lel2le31A DATE: e1/1~/67 PAGES:
EXTENDS THE PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD FOR REVIEW OF THE DRAFT
RI/FS FOR MILL CREEK UNTIL FEBRUARY 4, 1987. (YELLOW TISSUE
COPY. >
~~~8~:blIi~H~ONTANA OFFICE
KRABLIN RlCHARD
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC>
LETTER
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 202170~ NUMBER: 1el2l12131B DATE: 01/30/87 PAGES.
TITLE/SUBJECT. TRANSMITS PRECAUTIONS TO BE FOLLOWED IN THE DEMOLITION OF 4
. HOMES IN MILL CREEK DURING THE WEEK OF 2/2/67. NOTIFIES AMC
THAT AN AUTHORIZED EPA REPRESENTATIVE FROM SYSTEC WILL BE ON
SITE DURING THE DEMOLITION ACTIVITIES TO OBSERVEL TEST, AND
DOCUMENT FUGITIVE DUST EMISSIONS. (YELLOW TISSUt:. COPY.)
~~~8~:b~Ii~H~ONTANA OFFICE
g~~t~ND~~~~N~RALS COMPANY (AMC>
LETTER
AUTHOR:
ORG~NIZATION.
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
FILE: 202170~
TITLE/SUBJECT I
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER: 11210031C DATE: 01/30/87 PAGES,
TRANSMITTAL OF PREC~UTIONS TO BE FOLLOWED IN THE DEMOLITION
OF FOUR HOMES IN MILL CREEK DURING THE WEEK OF FEBRUARY 2
1987. NOTIFIES ANACONDA MINERALS CO. THAT AN AUTHORIZED EPA
REPRESENTATIVE WILL BE ON SITE DURING THE DEMOLITION ACTIVI-
iIES TO OSSERVE, TEST, AND DOCUMENT FUGITIVE DUST EMISSIONS.
WARDELL JOHN
USEPA-V~II,. MONTANA OFFICE
D~VIS JAC/"\ R.
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY CAMC>
LETTER
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
FILE: 202170~
TITLE/SUBJECT I
AUTHOR:
ORG~NIZATION:
ADDRESSEC::
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER. 11210031D D~TE: 00/00/0121 PAGES.
ATT~CHMENT I--DEMOLITION OF HOMES AND STRUCTURES IN MILL
CREEK. ADDRESSES THE FOLLOWING TOPICS: CONTROL OF AIRBORNE
PARTICULATES'r DEFINITIONSb BUILDING DEMOLITIONb ROADS AND
WORK AREAS, R~NSPORT OF EMOLITION DEBRIS, AN DISPOSAL OF
DEMOLITION DEBRIS. .
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MISCELLANEOUS
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
1~/~:/87 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX Page:::
=-=--========================================================================-
FILE: 2021705 NUMBER: 100032 DATEr 02/04/87 PAGES: 1
TITLE/SUBJECT: TRANSMITTAL OF FIVE COPIES OF ATTACHMENT 3 (NONE ATTACHED)
0pF ANACONDA'S COMMENTS TO THE MILL CREEK RI/FS ~HICH EPA
DRESENTED TO THE PUBLIC ON DECEMBER 23, 1986.
OLE STEPHEN E. .
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC)
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
LETTER
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: i::02170~
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100033 DATE: 02/04/87 PAGES. 2
TRANSMITTAL OF FIVE SETS OF ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY
COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT RI/FS ~HICH EPA PRESENTED TO THE
PU~LIC ON DECEMBER 23 1986. DOCUMENT ALSO DISCUSSES
DISAGREEMENT WITH LEVEL OF RISK IN ENDANGERMENT ASSESSMENT.
DAVIS, JACK R.
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY CAMC>
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
LETTER
---~---------------------------------------------~----------------------~~~=~-
FILEr 2021705
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100033A DATEr 02/03/87
REPORT ENTITLED: ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY COMMENTS
MILL CREEK DRAFT RI/FS, CERCLA DOCKET VIII 86-07.
NOT INDICATED
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY CAMC>
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
PAGES:
ON
e::
-----------------------------------------------------------------------~-~~=~~
FILE: 2021705
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100034 D~TEa 02/04/87 PAGES: 40
"ATTACHMENT 3 - SUPPLEMENTAL LEGAL CONCERNS"--CONTENTS:
GENERAL COMMENTS CONCERNING THE MILL CREEK" MONTANA DRA~T
FEASIBILITY STUDY AND COMMENTS CONCERNING wHETHER STATE
STANDARDS~ REQUIREMENTS, CRITERIA, OR LIMITATIONS ARE
PROPER ARIo!R'S.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
-------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~~-
FILE: 2021705
TITLE/SUBJECT r
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TY PE :
NUMBER a 100034A DATE: 02/11/87 PAGES:
PROGRESS REPORT NO.7 ON MILL CREEK, COVERING THE MONTH OF
JANUARY 1987.
DAVIS JACK R.
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC>
WARDELL JOHN
USEPA-v1II, MONTANA OFFICE
LETTER
---------------------------------------------------------------------------~~=
FILE: 202170~
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100034B D~TE: 02/i::4/87 PAGES.
CERTIFIED LETTER CONFIRMING ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY'S
ACQUISITION OF A HOME IN MILL CREEK ~HICH SHOULD 8E
RELOCATED RATHER THAN DEMOLISHED. REQUESTS EPA RECOMMEND
PRECAUTIONS TO BE FOLLOWED IN SUCH A CASE.
DAV IS JACK R.
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY CAMC)
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
LETTER
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/87 ADMINISTR~TIVE RECORD INDEX Page:l~:
-=====================================-=======================================
FILE: 2021705 NUMB£R: 100034C D~TE: 03/02/87 PAGES: ~~
TITLE/SUBJECT: TRANSMITTAL OF A MEMORANDUM FROM DIANE SHORT~ CCJM/DENVER~ ,
WHICH S~MMARIZES EPA'S RECENT REQUEST FOR MOuIFICATIONS Tu
THE DATA BASE FOR THE ANACONDA SMELTER. ENDORSES THE
REQUESTED MODIFICATIONS. (TWO YELLOW TISSUE COPIES. )
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
DAVIS JACK R.
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY CAMC>
LETTER
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021705
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
~DDRESSEE: '
ORGANIZATIQN:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100034D D~TE: 02/18/87 PAGES:
DISCUSSES PROPOSED B~TCH TABLE PORTION OF THE ANACONDA
DATA SASE. INCLUDES: MANNERS IN WHICH THE BATCH TABLE
WILL ADD TO THE UTILITY OF THE DATA BASE DEFINITIONS
OF QUALIFIERS USED BY THE DATA REVIEWER, 'AND AN EXAMPLE
OF A BATCH FILE.
SHORT, DIANE
CCJM
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
MEMO
...
-
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 20C:170~
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100034E D~TE: 03/12/87 P~GES:
ADVISES THAT ANACOND~ MINERALS COMPANY DECLINES TO MAKE
SUGGESTED CHANGES TO THE DAT~ MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR THE
ANACONDA SMELTER, ~ND DISCUSSES RATIONALE FOR THIS DECISION.
THIS LETTER IS IN RESPONSE TO M. B1SHOP'S LETTER DATED
MARCH 2\. 1987.
DAV I S .JACK R.
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY CAMC>
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
LETTER '
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 20C:170~
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORG~NIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100034F DATE: 03/31/87 PAGES:
RECOMMENDS PRECAUTIONS TO BE FOLLOWED BY ANACONDA MINERALS
COMPANY WHEN RELOCATING A HOME FROM MILL CREEK. ENCOURAGES
THE COLLECTION OF SAMPLES FROM A HOME AFTER CLEANING BUT
BEFORE RELOCATION~ TO DOCUMENT THE LEVEL OF CONTAMINATION.
(YELLOW TISSUE CO~Y. >
BISHOP rwlIKE
USEP~-VIII,. MONTANA OFFICE
DAVIS JACK R.
ANACONDA rwlINERALS COrwiPANY (ArwlC>
LETTER
.::
-------------------------------------------------~----------------------------
FILEz 202170~
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100034G DATE: 03/31/87 PAGES:
RECOMrwlENDS PRECAUTIONS TO BE FOLLOWED BY ANACONDA MINERALS
COMPANY WHEN RELOCATING A HOME FROM MILL CREEK. ENCOURAGES
THE COLLECTION OF SAMPLES FROrwi A HOME ~FTER CLEANING SUT
BEFORE RELOCATIONL TO DOCUMENT THE LEVEL OF CONTAMINATION.
(FIRST P~GE OF YE LOW TISSUE COPY; BODY SLASHED THROUGH. )
NOT INDICATED
USEPA
DAVIS JACK R.
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY CAMC>
LETTER
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/87 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX Page:::
=.=~==================----===a===8==--------=========------------------------
FILE: 2021705 NUMBER: 100034H--------DATEI 03/31/87---------PAGES~----
TITl.E/SUBJECTI RECOMMENDS PRECAUTIONS TO BE FOLLOWED BY ANACONDA MINERALS
COMPANY WHEN RELOCATING A HOME FROM MILL CREEK. ENCOURAGE~
THE COLLECTION OF SAMPLES FROM A HOME AFTER CLEANING BUT
BEFORE RELOCATION, TO DOCUMENT THE LEVEL OF CONTAMINATION.
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIII,. MONTANA OFFICE
DAVIS JACK R.
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC)
LETTER
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021705
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 1000341 DATE: 08/10/87 PAGES: 1
REQUESTS REFERENCES FROM ANACONDA MINERALS CO. THAT WERE
NOT AVAILABLE TO EPA BUT WERE CITED IN AMC REPORTS AND ARE
AVAILABLE IN A PROJECT SPECIFIC LIBRARY. THESE DOCUMENTS
HAVE BEEN FLAGGED IN ATTACHMENT 1 WITH AN "*". (ATTACHMENT
NOT INCLUDED>
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIII,. MONTANA OFFICE
DAVIS, JACI', R.
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC)
LETTER
------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~~-
FILE: 2021705
TI TLE/SUBJECT .
AUTHOR:
ORG':\NIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100034J DATE: 00/00/00 PAGES: 22
COMPLETE REFERENCE LIST-- THOSE REQUESTED BY MIKE BISHOP'S
LETTER (AUGUST 10, 1987> ARE HIGHLIGHTED.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
HANDWRITTEN NOTES
-----------------------~---------------------------------------------------~~-
FILE. 202170~
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~ AUTHOR:
, ORGANIZATION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TY PE :
NUMBER: 100034K
PANAFAX REQUEST
~~~~8~VI~I~EMONTANA OFFICE
DAVI S" JACK R.
NOT INDICATED
MISCELLANEOUS
DATE. 00/00/00
P~GES: 1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~~
FILE: 20Z1705
TITLE/SUBJECT:
ALJTHOR:
ORGANIZATION.
~DDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 10003~ DATE: 08/27/87 PAGES: 81
TRANSMITTAL OF EPA COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT RI/FS FOR MILL
CREEK~ ~ONTANA AND ATTACHMENTS 1 THROUGH 4. DATA USABILITY
RESULIS SPECIAL REPORT ON INGESTED INORGANIC ARSENIC
EVALUAT10N AND IDENTIFICATION OF ARARS, AND EXPLANATIONS ON
HISTORIC PRESERVATION REGULATIONS.
WARDELL JOHN
USEPA-v1II,. MONTAN~ OFFICE
DAVIS JACK R.
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC)
LETTER
---------------~-----------------------------------------------------------~-
FILE: 202170~ NUMBER. 100036 DATEs 09/02/87 PAGES: ~
TITLE/SUBJECT: RESPONDING TO QUESTIONS IN REGARD TO THE MOVEMENT OF
MATERIALS OFF SITE FROM MILL CREEK FOR SALVAGE. EPA
RECOMMENDS THAT AMC COMPLY WITH ONE OF THREE OPTIONS LISTED.
AUTHOR: COLEMAN CHARLES
ORGANIZATION: USEPA-viII,. MONTANA OFFICE
ADDRESSEE: DAVIS JACK R.
ORG~NIZATION: ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC)
DOCUMENT TYPE: LETTER
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
ANACONDA S~ELTER SITE
~ILL CREEK ~ONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/67 AD~INISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX Paga..,
FILE~=202i705========NUMBER~=i00037=-=======DATE~=0;;~3;87=========PAGES~=~~~
TITLE/SUBJECTs CONFIRMING VERBAL COMMUNICATION THAT ANACONDA MINERALS ~
COMPANY WILL BE UNABLE TO DELIVER THE FINAL DRAFT RIfFS IN
THE 21 DAY PERIOD REQUIRED BY THE ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER ON
CONSENT DUE TO THE THREE LISTED REASONS. CURRENT ESTIMATE
OF DELIVERY IS 35 DAYS OR OCTOBER 1, 1967.
DAV I S JACK R.
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC)
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
LETTER
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCU~ENT TYPEs
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 202170~
TITL.E/SUBJECTs
AUTHORs
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEEs
ORGANIZATION:
DOCU~ENT TYPEs
NU~BERs 100038 DATEs 0~/04/87 PAGES: 2
RESPONSE TO THE SEPTEM9ER 3" 1~87 LETTER REQUESTING AN
EXTENSION FOR THE CO~PLETION OF THE MILL CREEK RI/FS.
EPA IS WILLING TO GRANT A ONE WEEK EXTENSION. WITH THIS
EXTENSION\ THE RI/FS IS DUE ON THURSDAY SEPTEMBER a4, 1967.
(YELLOW T!SSUE COpy WITH CONCURRENCE IS ATTACHED)
WARDELL JOHN
USEPA-V}II,. MONTANA OFFICE
DAV I S JACt'\ R.
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (A~C)
LETTER
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 202170~ NU~BERs 10003~ DATE. 0~/10/87 PAGESs 16
TITLE/SUBJECT. TRANSMITTAL OF ~CVEHIL-MONNETT ASSOCIATES~ INC. COMMENTS AND
WRITTEN MATERIALS IN RESPONSE TO THE EPA'~ COMMENTS ON THE
MILL CREEK RI/FS REGARDING RECONTAMINATION POTENTIAL. THE
AUTHOR REQUESTS ADVICE ON HOW TO PROCEED.
AUTHOR: DAVIS JACK R.
ORGANIZATION: ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (A~C)
ADDRESSEE: BISHOP MIKE
ORGANIZATION: USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
~~~~~~!_!~~~~_:~!!~~-------------------------------------------------------_J
FILEs 202170~
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATIONs
DOCU~ENT TYPEs
NU~BERs 100040 DATE. 0~/10/a7 PAGES: 1
RESPONSE TO LETTER OF SEPTEM9ER 4 RE-REQUESTING REFERENCE
MATERIALS. TETRA TECH AND DAMES & MOORE WILL RENEW THEIR
EFFORTS AND WILL TRANSMIT THE DOCUMENTS DIRECTLY TO MIKE
BISHOP; IF THE DOCUMENTATION DOES NOT EXIST, THESE WILL
BE SO NOTED.
DAVIS JACK R.
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC>
BISHOP MIKE .
USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
LETTER
---------------------------------------------------------------------------,---
FILE: 202170~
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATIONs
DOCUMENT, TYPE.
NU~BER. 100041 DATE. 0~/14/67 PAGES: 2
INDICATING THAT ANACONDA ~INERALS COMPANY IS UNASLE TO
COMPLETE THE PREPARATION OF THE FINAL RI/FS IN THE 26 DAYS
CURRENTLY APPROVED BY EPAL AND THEY REITERATE A REQUEST FOR
AN EXTENSION TO 3~ CALEND~R DAYS DUE REASONS LISTED.
DAVIS JACK R.
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC)
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
LETTER
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/87 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX Page: 1:
======================================8=_a===================================
FILE: Z021705 NUMBER: 100042 DATE: 09/22/87 PAGES: 2
TITLE/SUBJECT: REGARDING CONCERNS OVER THE DRAFT MILL CREEK PARTIAL CONSENT
DECREE SENT 8Y MR. SCHERER TO R. WYCOFF ON 9/4/87. "MR.
WYCOFF RECIEVED THE TRANSMITTAL LETTER ON 9/9/87 AND ARCO
ACKNOWLEDGES THE INITIATION OF NEGOTIATION UNDER SECTION
12Z(e) OF CERCLA AS AMENDED"
KRABLIN RICHARD
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC)
DUPREY" ROBERT L.
USEPA-vIII
LETTER
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------~----
FILE: Z02170~
TITLE/SUBJECT I
AUTHOR:
ORGAN IZAT I ON I
ADDRESSEE I
ORGANIZATIONI
DOCUMENT TYPEI
NUMBER: 100043 DATE I 09/28/87 PAGES: 2
TRANSMITTAL OF TWO COPIES OF THE FINAL RI/FS FOR MILL CREEK9
MONTANA COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ADMINISTRATIVE
ORDER ON CONSENT. THE LETTER ALSO STATES THAT AMC DOES NOT
WITH EVERYTHING CONTAINED IN THE DOCUMENTS, AND ADDRESSES
CONCERNS ABOUT THE RI/FS PROCESS.
DESAUTELS JEFFREY H.
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC>
CALLAWAY REX
USEPA-VI\I, OFFIC& OF REGIONAL COUNSEL
LETTER
------------------------------------------------------------------------~=~=~-
FILE. 202170S
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPEI
NUMBER: 100044 DATE. 09/29~87
RESPONDING TO THE LETTER OF 9/28/87 REGARDING
OBJECTIONS OF ARCO TO THE MILL CREEK, MONTANA
CALLAWAY REX
USEPA-VI\I, OFFICE OF REGIONAL COUNSEL
DESAUTELS JEFFREY H.
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC>
LETTER
PAGES: ;2
GENERAL
R 1/ FS.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~=~-
FILE: 202170~
TITLE/SUBJECT.
. AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 10004S DATE: 09/00/87 P~GESI 316
"FINAL REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION REPORTL MILL CREEK" MONTANA
ANACONDA SMELTER SUPERFUND SITE, FIR::!T OPERABLE uNIT"
NOT INDICATED
ANACONDA MINERALS COMP~NY (AMC>
NOT INDICATED
USEP~-VIII
REPORT/STUDY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~-
FILE. Z0Z170~
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATIONI
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 100046 DATE: 09/Z8/87 PAGES: 22~
"FINAL FEASIBILITY STUDY REPORT MILL CREEK MONTANA
ANACONDA SMELTER SUPERFUND SITE, FIRST OPERA8LE UNIT
VOLUME I"
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------~~-
FILEI Z0Z170~ NUMBER: 100047 DATE I 09/00/87 PAGES: 133
TITLE/SUBJECT I ~~~~~~D~E~~~~t~kT~u~~~~0NSE~~~~~M~I~s~Ra~~RA~e~TB~~T~
VOLUME II - APPENDICES" (RECEIV~D FROM AMC ON 9/Z8/Sf)
AUTHOR I NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION: ANACONDA MINERALS COMP~NY (AMC>
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION. NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: REPORT/STUDY,
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL C~EEK MONTAN~ OPER~BLE UNIT
10/01/87 ~D~INISTR~T~VE RECORD INDEX Page:ll:
.-~~-------=======--~-==s====a=========================-===========----------,
FiLE;-iiii~05 - ~UMBER: 100048 D~TE. 0~/00/87 ~~iii;-~~~-
TITLE/SUBJECT: "FIN~L -~EMEDIAL INVESTIGATION REPORT MILL CREEK, MONTANA
~N~CONO~ SMELTER SUPERFUND SITE, FIRST OPERABLE UNIT"
(RECEIVED FROM ~MC ON ~/28/87. CONTAINS EPA HAND~RITTEN
REVISIONS/COMMENTS)
AUTHOR. NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION: ANACOND~ MINER~LS COMPANY (~MC)
~DDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
ORG~NIZATION: USEPA-VIII
DOCUMENT TYPE: REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 202170~
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORG~NIZ~TION.
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 10004~ ~ D~TE: 0~/28/87 P~GES: 225
"FIN~L FEASIBILITY ST\..t)y REPORT MILL CREEK MONTAN~
AN~COND~ SMELTER SUPERFUND SITE, FIRST OPERABLE UNITL
VOLUME I" (RECEIVED FROM ~MC ON 9/28/87. CONTAINS E~A
HANDWRITTEN REVISIONS/COMMENTS)
NOT INDIC~TED
AN~COND~ MINERALS COMPANY (AMC)
NOT INDICATED- ~
NOT INDIC~TED-
REPORT /STUDY .
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 202170:5
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 1000~0 DATE: 09/00/87 PAGES: 19~
"FINAL FE~SI91LITY STUDY REPORT "'ILL CREEK "'ONTANA .
AN~COND~ SME~TER SUPERFUND SITE~ FIRST OPERABLE UNIT~
VOLUME II - ~PENDICEa" (RECEIV~D FROM AMC ON 9/28/8r.
CONTAINS EPA HANDWRITTEN REVISIONS/COMMENTS)
NOT INDIC~TED
~N~CONDA MINER~LS COMPANY (~MC)
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDIC~TED
REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021706 NUMBER: 100001 D~TE. 10/23/84 PAGES: 1
TITLE/SUBJECT. TRANSMITTAL QF THE FI~L CERCL~ ~DMINISTRATIVE ORDER FOR THE
AN~CONDA SMELTER SITE ~HICH TOOK EFFECT 10/22/84.
~UTHOR: CALL~WAY REX ~ .
ORG~NIZ~TION: USEPA-VI~IT OFFICE OF ~EGIONAL COUNSEL
ORG~~¥~~~Tg~: ~~~E5~bAP~I~~R~LS COM~ANY (AMC)
DOCUMENT TYPE. LETTER ~.i
-------------------------------------~----------------------------------------
FILE: 2021706
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR.
ORG~NIZ~TION:
ADDRESSEEr
ORG~NIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100002 D~TE: 10/23/84 PAGES: 1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE FOR THE ~TTACHED ~DMINISTR~TIVE
ORDER (DOCKET NO. CERCLA-VIII-84-08) THE ORIGINAL WHICH ~AS
FILED WITH THE REGIONAL HE~RING CLERKb EPA REGION VIII AND
A COpy MAILED TO PETE~ HALLER, AN~CON ~ "'fNE~~L CO.
CALLAWAY REX '
USEPA-VI~IL OFFICE OF REGION~L COUNSEL
HALLER PE rER H.
~N~CONbA "'INERALS COMPANY (~MC)
MISCELL~NEOUS
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEr 2021706
TITLE/SUBJECT.
~UTHOR.
ORG~NIZATION:
~DDRESSEE.
ORG~NIZ~TION.
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER. 100003 DATEr 10/18/84£
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER ON CONSENT IN THE "'ATTER
RICHFIELD COMPANY. ISSUED ON OCTOBER 22, 1984
DUPREY,. ROBERT L. .
USEPA-vIII .
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
COURT DOCUMENT
PAGES: 37
OF ~TLANTIC
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONT~N~ OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/87 ~DMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX P~ge:1;~
s==a====~=========2==--__-==.--=====----------========------------------------
FILE: 2021706 NUMBER. 100004 --------OATE: 10/~1/84---------PAGES:-l~=-
TITLE/SUBJECT: REPORT ENTITLED: FINAL WORK PLAN FOR ANACONDA SMELTER RI/FS -
(INTERNAL DOCUMENT NO. 77.8L18.~> ANACONDA, MONTANA
(VOLUME 1: SCOPE AND SCHEDULE>
NOT INDICATED
CH2M HILL
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
AUTHOR:
ORG~NIZATION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021706
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TY PE :
NUMBER: 100005 D~TE: 10/01/84 PAGES: 1
TRANSMITTAL OF 20 COPIES OF THE FINAL WORK PLAN FOR REMEDIAL
INVESTIGATION/FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR THE ANACONDA SMELTER.
DOCUMENT ALSO STATES THAT THE FINAL WORK PLAN IS A REVISED
VERSION OF THE ~UGUST 21, 1984 DRAFT ~ND INCORPORATES THE
EPA COMMENTS
LOVELL\ DOUGLAS W.
CH2M HlLL
DUNN JIM
USEPA-VIIIb MONTANA OFFICE
REPORT/STU Y
------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~~~=
FILE: 2021706
TI TLE/SU8JECT I
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUM8ERs 100006 DATE: 07r10/8S PAGESg 1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE FOR THE ATTACHED AMENDMENT TO
~DMINISTRATIVE ORDER THE
ORIGINAL AND ONE COpy OF WHICH WAS FILED BY THE REGIONAL
HEARING CLERK, EPA REGION VIII AND A TRUE COpy MAILED TO
PETER HALLER.
ORTEGAb EMILY E.
NOT IN rCATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MISCELLANEOUS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------~~
~FILEI 2021706
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZATION:
DOCUMENT TY PE :
NUMBER: 100007 DATE I 00/00/00
TRANSMITTAL OF A SIGNED COpy OF THE AMENDMENTS TO
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER ON CONSENT
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONT~N~ OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/87 ~DMINISTR~TIVE RECORD INDEX Page:11
========================S====~======,=====::8================================ = ==
FILE: 2021706 NUMBER: 100010 DATE: 12/20/65E' PAGES: 38
TITLE/SUBJECT: ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER ON CONSENT -
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPER~8LE UNIT
10/01/87 ~DMINISTR~TIVE RECORD INDEX ~age::
====================================-=---============--=----------------------
FILE: a0Z1707 NUMBER: 100001 - --- DATE: 03/0~/85E--------PAGES~-1~-
TITLE/SUBJECT: "REPORT ON THE MARCH 1985 ANACONDA, MONTANA URINARY ARSENl:
SURVEY"
AUTHOR: 8INDER SUE CM.D.) .
ORGANIZATION: CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL CCDC)
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: REPORT/STUDY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------.----
FILE: 2021707
TI TLE/SUBJECT :
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZ~TIONI
~DDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100001A DATE: 11/13/84 PAGES: 15
"PRELIMINARY WORK PLAN - AN EPIDEMIOLOGIC EVALUATION OF
LUNG AND SKIN CANCER INCIDENCE IN COMMUNITIES NEAR THE
ANACONDA SMELTER"
NOT INDICATED
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATES, INC.
NOT INDICATED
~NACONDA MINERALS COMPANY CAMC)
REPORT/STUDY
-------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~~-
FILE: 2021707
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100001B DATE: 11/13/84
"PRELIMINARY WORK PLAN - HEAVY METAL ABSORPTION
LIVING NEAR THE ANACONDA SMELTER"
NOT INDICATED
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATES, INC.
NOT INDIC~TED
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY CAMC)
REPORT/STUDY
PAGES: 1 7
IN CHILDREN
----------------------------------~--------------------------------------~~~~~
FILEJ 2021707
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORG~NIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
~ ORGAN I ZAT ION:
~OCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100001C DATE: 11/19/84E PAGES: 46
"ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATES~ INC., QUALIFICATIONS AND
CAPABILITIES", INCLUDES RESUMES uF EHA EMPLOYEES.
NOT INDICATED
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATES, INC.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
----------------------------------------------------------------------------~=
FILE: 2021707
TI TLE/SUBJECT :
~UTHORJ
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TY PE :
NUMBER: 1000010 DATE: 11/28/84 PAGES: 1
A REQUEST THAT THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ASSISTS
IN SELECTING TWO MEM8ERS OF THE SCIENTIFIC PEER REVIEW
COMMITTEE FROM EPA AND CDC PERSONNEL.
TILMAN RAY
ANACONDA MINER~LS COMPANY CAMC)
BISHOP /lUKE
USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
LETTER
----------------------------------------------------------------------~-----~-
FILEr 2021707
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZ~TION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGAN I ZAT I ON:
DOCUMENT TY PE :
NUMBER: 100001E D~TE: 03/14/8SE PAGES: 6
TRANSMITTAL OF COMMENTS PROVIDED BY SUZANNE 8INDER~ M.D.,
WENDY KAYE Ph.D ~ND RICK WAXWEILLER Ph.D FROM CuC
ON THE PROPOSED WORK PLAN BY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATES
TITLED" AN EPIDEMIOLOGIC EVALUATION OF LUNG AND SKIN CANCE~
INCIDENCE IN COMMUNITIES NEAR THE ANACONDA SMELTER."
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIII,. MONTANA OFFICE
TILMAN RAy
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY CAMC)
LETTER
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONT~N~ OPER~BLE UNIT
10/01/87 ~DMINISTR~TIVE RECORD INDEX Page:ll
D--=------===============a.=2==_=~~========~.=====================-----------
FILE;-2021707 NUMBER: 100001F D~TE: 0Z/26/85 -PAGES~-4--
TITLE/SUBJECT: COMMENTS PROVIDED BY GEORGI ~. JONES FROM CDC ON
THE PROPOSED ~ORK PLAN BY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATES
ENTITLED "AN EPIDEMIOLOGIC EVALUATION OF LUNG AND SKIN
CANCER INCIDENCE IN COMMUNITIES NEAR THE ~NACONDA SMELTER",
JONES GEORGI A.
CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL (CDC>
SKO~RONSKI, EDW~RD J.
USEPA-VIII .
MEMO
~UTHOR:
ORG~NIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021707
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORGANIZ~TION:
DOCUI'tENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100001G D~TE: 03/01/83 PAGES: 6
COl't"'ENTS ON SUBI'tITTED D~TA ON THE ANACONDA SMELTER ~ASTE
SITE,. AN~CONDA~ MONTANAb ~HICH ~AS REVIEWED BY A COMMITTEE
OF THE CENTER ~OR ENVIR NMENTAL HEALTH (CDC>.
JONES GEORGI A.
CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL (CDC)
SKOWRONSKI, EDWARD J.
USEPA-VIII
MEMO
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEI 2021707
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUI'tENT TYPE:
NUl'tBER: 100002 DATE I 0~/06/a~ PAGES: 2
TRANSMITTAL AND RESULTS OF THE URINARY ARSENIC ANALYSES. THE
PEOPLE FROM WHOl't THE SAI'tPLES WERE OBTAINED WERE NOT PART OF
THE URINARY ARSENIC SURVEY OF PRESCHOOL CHILDREN AND NONE OF
THE VALUES WERE ELEVATED.
~~~~i=s ~g~ ri~S~A~E CONTROL (CDC)
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIII, MONTAN~ OFFICE
LETTER
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021707
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER. 100003 DATE: 07/00/8~
"ANACONDA" MONTANA JULY 198~ ARSENIC STUDY"
BINDER SuE (M.D.)
CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL (CDC>
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
PAGES: 23
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEt 2021707
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUI'tBER: 100004 DATE: 03/04/86 PAGES: 3
"ADDENDUM TO THE JULY URINARY ARSENIC SURVEY: MILL CREEK
FOLLOWUP." DISCUSSION OF THE ENCLOSED DATA INDICATING THAT
MILL CREEK CHILDERN CONTINUED TO BE EXPOSED TO ENVIRONMENTAL
ARSENIC IN SUMMER AND AUTUMN, 19a~.
BINDER SUE
CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL
BUYNOWSKIL GEORGE
NOT INDIC~TED
MEMO
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONT~N~ OPER~8LE UNIT
10/01/87 ~DMINISTR~TIVE RECORD INDEX Page::~
===================-=-=------=====-----==------===---------------------------
FILE: 2021707 - ~UMBER~-100006---- ---DATE: 03/18/86---------PAGES~-:--
TITLE/SUBJECT: TRANSMITTAL OF THE RESPONSE OF THE CENTER FOR DISEASE
CONTROL TO THE REQUEST 8Y THE ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCI~
OF ANACONDA-DEER LODGE COUNTY FOR A "HUMAN HEALTH STUDY"
DOCUMENT ALSO STATES THAT CDC HAS DECLINED TO CONDUCT THE
STUDY DUE TO SMALL POPULATION SIZE AND PAST EXPOSURE
MCGEEHIN MICH~EL
AGENCY FOR TOXIC SUBSTANCES & DISE~SE REGISTRY (ATSDR)
DUPREY,. ROBERT L.
USEPA-vIII
MEMO
~UTHOR:
ORG~NIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~~--
FILE: 2021707
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT "TYPE:
NUMBER I 100006~ D~TE: 04/07/86 PAGES: 11
REG~RDING CORREL~TION BETWEEN ENVIRONMENTAL S~MPLING RESULTS
(E&E~ ~/8~) AND URIN~RY ~RSENIC V~LUES (CDC, 3/e~),
~N~CuND~~ MONTAN~.
BINDER ~UE (M.D.)
CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL (CDC)
F~LK\ HENRY (M.D.) ,
NOT !NDICATED
MEMO
------------------------------------------------------------------------~~=~~-
FILE: 2021707
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORG~NIZATION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZ~TIONI
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100006B D~TE: 0~/03/86
COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT OF THE MILL CREEK REMEDIAL
INVESTIG~TION REPORT, SPECIFIC~LLY THE DATA ON
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS.
MCGEEHIN MICH~EL
AGENCY FOR TOXIC SUBST~NCES & DISE~SE REGISTRY (~TSDR)
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIII, MONTAN~ OFFICE
MEMO
P~GES: 1
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------~
FILEI 2021707
I TI TLE/SUBJECT :
AUTHO R :
ORG~NIZATION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100007 D~TE: 02/0~/87 P~GES: 16
"HE~LTH ASSESSMENT MILL CREEK, MONTAN~, ~NACOND~ SMELTER
SITE (SI-87-049)."
HUTCHINSON LESLIE J. (M. D. )
AGENCY FOR'TOXIC SU~STANCES & DISE~SE REGISTRY (~TSDR)
MCGEEHIN MICHAEL
AGENCY FOR TOXIC SUBST~NCES & DISEASE REGISTRY (~TSDR)
MEMO
------------------------------------------------------------------------~-~~~~
FILE: 20~1707
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORG~NIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100008 DATE: 04/0~/87 P~GES: 3
TRANSMITTAL AND MEMO FROM DR. 8INDER CONCERNING THE PRE- .
AND POST MOVE URIN~RY ~RSENIC LEVELS FOR CITIZENS OF MILL
CREEK.
McGEEHIN MICHAEL
AGENCY FOR TOXIC SUaST~NCES & DISEASE REGISTRY (ATSDR)
B I SHO P ,.. I KE
USEPA-VIII, MONTAN~ OFFICE
MEMO
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-..,
FILE: 2021708
TI TLE/SUBJECT :
~UTHORI
ORG~NIZATIONr
~DDRESSEE:
ORGANIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TY PE :
NUMBER: 100001 D~TE: 10/12/84 P~GES: 48
FIN~L PRELIMIN~RY ENDANGERMENT ASSESSMENT FOR ANACONDA
SMELTER RI/FS ANACOND~,MONTANA (INTERNAL DOCUMENT. 77.8L18)
NOT INDICATED
CH2M HILL
HALVORSON, MARIE
USEPA
REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTAN~ OPER~BLE UNIT
10/01/87 ADMINISTR~TIVE RECORD INDEX P~ge:1~:
-=------=--==================================~=z=.======================------
FILE~-2021708 - NUMBER: 100002 D~TE: 10/1~/84 P~GES~-i---
TITLE/SUBJECT: TRANSMITT~L OF THREE COPIES OF THE FIN~L PRELT~INARY
ENDANGERMENT ASSESSMENT (PEA) FOR THE ANACONDA SMELTER SITE.
DOCUMEN~ STATES THAT THE FIN~L PEA IS A REYISED YERSION OF
OCT08ER SL1g84 DRAFT PEAl AND THAT IT INCORPORATES EPA
COMMENTS ~ELAYED ONOCTO~ER 11, 1984.
LOYELLi DOUGLAS W.
CH2M H LL
DUNN JIM
USEPA-YIII, MONTAN~ OFFICE
LETTER
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 20~1708
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORG~NIZATION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORGAN IZ~T I ON:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100002A D~TE: 02/03/86 PAGES: 5
COMMENTS ON THE CLEMENT'S END~NGERMENT ASSESSMENT FOR MILL
CREEK MONTANA WHICH THE AUTHOR BELIEVES PRESENTS A
REASONA8LE CHARACTERIZATION OF THE RISK IN MILL CREEK, BUT
DOCUMENT COULD H~VE BENEFITED FROM SOME ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION.
WHITE PAUL
USEPA'HEADQUARTERS
DUPREY,. R08ERT L.
USEPA-vIII
LETTER
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021708
TITL.E/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100003 D~TE: 04/23/86 P~GES: 131
REPORT ENTITLED: END~NGERMENT ~SSESSMENT: MILL CREEK, MON-
T~N~ ~NACOND~ SMELTER SITE - REVISED FIN~L REPORT (INTERN~L
DOCUMENT NO. 2~8-WP1-EP-CKHU-1)
NOT INDICATED
CLEMENT & ASSOCI~TES, INC.
NOT INDICATED
USEP~-VIIIb MONT~N~ OFFICE
REPORT/STU Y
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021708
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
~ODRESSEE:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100004 D~TE: 10/30/86
"SPECI~L REPORT ON INGESTED INORG~NIC ~RSENIC ~ND
HUM~N HE~LTH EFFECTS" (EXTERN~L REVIEW DR~FT)
CONT~INS ~PPENDICES ~ THROUGH D.
LEYINE, TINA
USEP~, OFFICE OF PESTICIDES ~ND TOXIC SUBST~NCES
NOT INDICATED
USEP~ HE~OQUARTERS
REPORT/STUDY
P~GES I 148
CERTAIN
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021709
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORG~N IZ ~ T I ON:
~ODRESSEE:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBERs 100001 D~TE: 00/00/86E P~GESI 2
~ PETITION BY THE RESIDENTS OF MILL CREEK RESIDENTIAL AREA
OPPOSING ~NY PROCESSING OF FLUE DUST ~T THE FORMER SITE OF
THE ANACONDA COMPANY SMELTER.
~RRIGO JOHN
CITIZEN(S) OF MILL CREEK, MONT~N~
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
"'ISCELLANEOUS
'"
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEr 2021709
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORG~NIZATION:
~ODRESSEE:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100002 D~TE: 01/07/86
EXPRESSING THE CONCERNS OF ~ RESIDENT ~80UT
BLOWS FROM THE VAULT ON ~ REGUL~R BASIS ~ND
METHODS OF CONTROLLING THE DUST.
NOLL" KENNETH
NOT lNDICATED
8ISHOP MIKE
USEPA-(;III, MONTANA OFFICE
LETTER
P~GES I 1
FLUE DUST WHICH
THE POTENTIAL
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
~ILL CREEK MONT~N~ OPER~BLE UNIT
10/~~~~~-- ~DMINISTR~TIVE RECORD INDEX P~ge: 1~-
FiLE~-2021;0;========NU~BER~=700003=========DATE~=07;08;86E========~~GES~=7==~
TITLE/SUBJECT: REGARDING ~ RESIDENT'S CONCERN ABOUT THE FLUE DUST ON THE
OSMELTER HILL AND HIS FEELINGS THAT THE PITS SHOULD NOT 8E
~ PENED.
, ~UTHOR: NOLL EDGAR
ORG~NIZATION: NOT iNDICATED
ADDRESSEE: BISHOP MIKE
ORG~NIZ~TION: USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
DOCU~ENT TYPE: LETTER
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021709
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORG~NI ZATION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORG~N I Z~T I ON:
DOCUMENT TY PE :
NU~BER: 100004 D~TE: 01/06/86 PAGES: 1
COMMENTS ON ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER CERCLA VIII-85-09 REGARDING
THE MOVING OF ANACONDA SMELTER SITE FLUE DUST AND NOTES
INDIC~TING THAT THERE WAS NO MOVEMENT DURING THE PERIOD OF
3/1 THROUGH 9/31 FOR ~NY YEAR.
PETERSON PAUL
~RROWHEAb ~PI~RIES
BISHOP MIKE
USEP~-VIII, MONTAN~ OFFICE
LETTER
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~-~~
FILE: 20~ 1709
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORG~NI Z~TION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
DOCU~ENT TY PE :
NUMBER: 100005 DATE: 01/09/86 P~GES: 1
REGARDING THE ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER ON CONSENT, DOCKET NO.
CERCLA-VII-85-09 AND THE CONCERN ABOUT THE 20~ OPACITY
ST~NDARD FOR VISIBLE EMISSIONS OF FLUE DUST. NOTES
ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECONOMIC BENEFITS IF THE FLUE DUST WAS
RENDERED LESS-TOXIC OR NON-TOXIC.
t~~g5~bAR: E~~R LODGE COUNTY
DUPREY ROBERT L.
USEPA REGION VIII, WASTE MAN~GEMENT DIVISION
LETTER
---------------------------------------------------------------------------~--
FILE: 2021709
J.ITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR':
ORG~N I Z~T I ON:
~DDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZATION:
DOCUMENT TY PE :
NUMBER: 100006 DATE: 01/06/86 PAGES: 1
COMMENTS ON ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER CERC~A-VIII-8~-09 WHICH
REGARDS THE MOVING OF ANACONDA SMELTER SITE FLUE DUST AND
NOTES THAT THERE WAS NO MOVEMENT DURING THE PERIOD OF 3/1
THROUGH 9/31 FOR ANY YEAR.
PETERSON PAUL
ARROWHEAb ~PIARIES
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
LETTER
--------------------------------------~----------------------------------~~--~
FILE: 2021709
TITLE/SUBJECT I
AU'iHOR:
ORGAN I ZAT I ON:
~DDRESSEE:
ORGAN I ZAT I ON:
DOCU~ENT TY PE I
NUMBER: 100007 D~TE: 01/07/86 PAGESz 1
EXPRESSING THE CONCERNS OF ~ RESIDENT ABOUT THE FLUE DUST
WHICH BLOWS FROM THE VAULT ON A REGULAR BASIS AND THE
POTENTIAL METHODS FOR CONTROLLING THE DUST.
NOLL" KENNETH
NOT !NDICATED
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIII, MONTAN~ OFFICE
LETTER
----------------------------------------------------------------------------~~
FILE: 2021709 NU~BER: 100008 DATE: 01/08/86E PAGES: 1
TITLE/SUBJECT: REGARDING THE CONCERNS OF ~ RESIDENT ABOUT THE FLUE DUST
ON THE SMELTER HILL AND HIS FEELINGS THAT THE PITS SHOULD
NOT BE OPENED.
AUTHOR: NOLL EDGAR
ORGANIZ~TION: NOT iNDICATED
ADDRESSEE: BISHOP MIKE
ORGANIZATION: USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
DOCUMENT TYPE: LETTER
------u_----------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
AN~CONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTAN~ OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/87 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX Page:122
=a-=-=----==2=====8===2_s==a=======.~=8===:_=s=-====================-----------~
FILE; Z021709 NUMBER: 100009 D~TEI 01/09/86 PAGES;-l---
TITLE/SUBJECT: REGARDING ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER ON CONSENT,. DOCKET NO.
CERCLA-VIII-8S-09 AND THE CONCERN ABOUT THE 20~ OPACITY
STANDARD FOR CISIBLE EMISSIONS OF FLUE DUST. NOTES
ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECONOMIC BENEFITS IF THE FLUE DUST ~AS
RENDERED LESS-TOXIC OR NON-TOXIC.
~~~g5~DAR: ~~~R LODGE COUNTY
DUPREY ROSERT L.
USEPA REGION VIII, WASTE MANAGEMENT DIVISION
LETTER
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 20;;1709
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGAN I ZAT I ON:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100010 DATE: 01/20/86 PAGES: 1
TRANSMITTAL OF A NOTICE FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY
COUNCIL MEETING FOR TUESDAY~ JANUARY 28 1986 AT ePM.
NOTES TH~T MR. BISHOP'S ATT~NDANCE IS NOT REQUIRED.
(NOTICE IS NOT ATTACHED>
BIFOSS R. BEN .
ANACONDA - DEER LODGE COUNTY
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-~III, MONTANA OFFICE
LETTER
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021709
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100011 DATE: 01/28/86 P~GES: 4
RESPONSE TO GOVERNOR SCHWINDEN'S LETTER WHICH ASKED
QUESTIONS PERTAINING TO MILL CREEK~ MONTANA. AN ATTEMPT TO
PROVIDE COMPLETE ANSWERS TO THESE ~UESTIONS HAS BEEN MADE.
WELLES,. JOHN G.
USEPA-vIII
SCHWINDEN TED
STATE OF MONTANA, OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
LETTER
-------------------------------------------------------~----------------------
FILE: 2021709
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATIONI
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100012 DATE: 02/0~/86 P~GES: Z
A REQUEST FROM THE ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCI~ OF
ANACONDA-DEER LODGE COUNTY FOR THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION
REGARDING THE MI~L CREEK CLEANUP: A WRITTEN PLAN OF ACTION
INCLUDING GEOGRAPHIC LIMITS OF THE C~EANUP, A FO~LOWUP
MONITORING P~AN AND A HUMAN HEALTH STUDY.
BIFOSS R. BEN
ANACONDA - DEER LODGE COUNTY
DUPREY ROBERT L.
USEPA REGION VIII, WASTE MANAGEMENT DIVISION
LETTER
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021709
TITLE/SUB.1ECT:
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100013 DATE: 02/07/86 PAGES: 1
REGARDS THE COMPARISON OF A SHORT-TERM SOLUTION TO ROAD
DUST BY OILING ROADS,. TO A LONG-TERM SOLUTION DEVELOPED BY
EPA. MR. BIFOSS REQuESTS A RESPONSE FROM MR. BISHOP.
au:OSS R. BEN
~ONDA - DEER LODGE COUNTY
&l'SHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
LETTER
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021709
TITLE/SUB.1ECT:
AUTHOR I
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATIONI
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100014 DATE: 04/04/86 PAGES: 3
NOTES ADDITIONAL CONCERNS BROUGHT UP BY. A LETTER OF MARCH
26~ 1986 AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL MEETING OF
MAHCH 27 1986. THE CONCERNS ARE THE DELAY IN THE
PREPQRAT~ON OF THE ENDANGERMENT ASSESSMENT, AND THE TWO
REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES.
SIFOSS R. BEN
ANQCONDQ - DEER LODGE COUNTY
DUPREY ROSERT L.
USEPA REGION VIII, WASTE MANAGEMENT DIVISION
LETTER
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
AN~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTAN~ OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/67 ADMINIStRATIVE RECORD INDEX Page:l:
===========================a====================z=============================
FILE: 20Z1709 NUMBER: 100015 DPTE: 04/21/86 PAGES: 1
TITLE/SUBJECT: CONCERNS THE SCHEDULE OF THE MAY MEETING OF THE ANACONDA-
DEER LODGE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL TO COINCIDE
WITH THE EPA'S DECIS.ION ON THE REMOVAL ACTION RESPONSE FOR
MILL CREEK.
BIFOSS R. BEN
ANACONDA - DEER LODGE COUNTY
DUPREY ROBERT L.
USEPA REGION VIII, WASTE MANAGEMENT DIVISION
LETTER
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZ~TION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021709
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100017 DATE: OS/26/86 PAGES: 3
A LIST OF DEMANDS SET FORTH BY THE MILL CREFK RESIDENTS
ASSOCIATION AT THEIR MEETING ON MAY 26 1966. DEMANDS
CONCERN COMPENSATION FOR THOSE RESIDENTS THAT WANT TO MOVEt
THOSE TH~T WANT TO STAY~ AND THOSE THAT ARE RENTING. (A M~P
OF THE LOCATIONS OF RES!DENTS' HOMES IS INCLUDED)
PATTERSON PEG
MILL CREEk RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION
ARRIGO JOHN
NOT INDICATED
MEETING NOTES
-------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~~-
FILE: 2021709 NUMBER: 100016 DATE: 06/2'/66 PAGES x 4
TITLE/SUBJ~CT: RESPONSE TO THE PETITION FROM THE MILL CREEK RESIDENTS
ASSOCIATION WHICH STATED THE RESIDENTS DEMANDS REGARDING
RELOCATION. IT IS NOTED THAT A DECISION CANNOT BE MADE
REGARDING THESE DEMANDS UNTIL THE RI/FS IS COMPLETED. THE
DEMANDS ARE ADDRESSED AS COMPLETELY AS POSSIBLE.
AUTHOR: BISHOP MIKE
ORGANIZATION: USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
ADDRESSEE: PATTERSON~ PEG
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICHTED
DOCUMENT TYPE: LETTER
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------~
~FILE: 2021709 NUMBER: 100019 D~TE: 07/11/86 PAGES: 1
TITLE/SUBJECT: TRANSMITTAL OF MEMORANDUMS THAT HAVE BEEN PROVIDED BY THE
CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL CONCERNING HEALTH/EPIDEMIOLOGIC
STUDIES IN THE ~ILL CREEK AREA.
BISHOP, ~IKE
USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
PATTERSON PEG
MILL CREEk RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION
LETTER
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------~-
FILE: 202170~
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHORI
ORG~NIZATION.
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER x 100020 D~TE: 03/10/66 PAGES: 1
STATES TWO REASONS WHY A HEALTH STUDY AND URINARY ARSENIC
TESTING FOR MILL CREEK RESIDENTS WOULD NOT BE BENEFICIAL AT
THIS TIME. OFFERS ALTERN~TIVE HEALTH STUDIES -FOR THE
RESIDENTS.
BLMDER SUE (M.D.)
~ARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
8U¥NOWSKI~ GEORGE
~ INDICHTED
MEMO
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 202170~ NUMBERs 100021 DATE: 02/07/6' PAGES: 1
TITLE/SUBJECT: REVIEW OF "AN EPIDEMIOLOGIC EVALUATION OF LUNG AND SKIN
CANCER INCIDENCE IN COMMUNITIES NEAR THE ANACONDA SMELTER~
PRELIMINARY WORK PLAN." COMMENTS OF RICK WAXWEILLER, Ph.u.
AND WENDY KAY,. Ph.D. ARE ATTACHED.
AUTHORs BINDER SUE (~.D.)
ORGANIZATION: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
ADDRESSEE: MARGOLISL STEPHEN (Ph.D.)
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDI~ATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: MEMO
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/67 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX Page:12
-...-=================ss===_.=====a=======aa_==========a====a==========------
FILE~ a02170~ NUMBER: 100022 DATF-I 02/04/65 PAGES~-4--
TITLE/SUBJECT: REVIEW,OF "AN EPIDEMIOLOGIC EVALUATION OF LUNG AND SKIN
CANCER INCIDENCE IN COMMUNITIES NEAR THE ANACONDA SMELTER
PRELIMINARY WORK PLAN" BY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATES:
INC.
KAYE WENDY E.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
BINDER SUE (M.D.)
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
MEMO
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZAT I ON:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEs 2021709
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR,
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGAN II AT I ON:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER' 100022A DATE. 11/30/86. PAGES:
SUMMARY OF COMMUNITY CONCERNS. COMMENTS ON DELAY IN THE
RELEASE OF THE MILL CREEK REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/FEASIBILITY
STUDY~ AND A SENSE OF FUTILITY AMONG COUNTY OFFICIALS AND
RES I Dt:.NTS.
ASPHOLM AUDREY
ANACONDA COMMUNITY RELATIONS
~6~ZY~bIE~f~D
MEMO
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE' 2021709
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR,
ORGANIZATION'
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION'
DOCUMENT TYPE,
NUMBER: 100023 DATE. 01/12/87 PAGES: 1
HANDWRITTEN LETTER STATING THAT WINNIE JOHNSON WOULD BE IN
FAVOR OF SELLING TWO PARCELS OF LAND IN MILL CREEK.
JOHNSON\ WINNIE
NOT INDICATED
AUDREY
NOT INDICATED
LETTER
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEs 2021709
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR,
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPEI
NUMBER: 100024 DATE: 01/12/87 PAGES: 1
A HANDWRITTEN VOTE TO SELL FROM LESLIE O. AND WINNIE A.
JOHNSON.
JOHNSON\ LESLIE O.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
LETTER
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 2021709
TITLE/SUBJECT,
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION.
DOCu.-tENT TYPE.
NUMBERs 10002~ DATE. 01/0~/87 P~GES: 1
HANDWRITTEN NOTE STATING OPINION THAT ALL RESIDENTS IN
MILL CREEK~ MONTANA SHOULD BE RELOCATED AND THAT THE LAND
SHOULD BE ~ONDEMNED.
MEYER,. HELEN "'.
NOT INDICATED
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
LETTER
-------------~-------------------------------------------------------------
FILEs 20217~
TITLE/SUBJECT,
AUTHOR s
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER. 100026 DATEs 01/0~/87 P~GESI 1
HANDWRITTEN NOTE STATING OPINION THAT ALL RESIDENTS OF MILL
CREEK, MONTAN~ BE RELOCATED AND THE LAND BE CONDEMNED.
MEYER,. RICHARD W.
NOT INDICATED
BISHOP MIKE
USEP~-VIII, MONTAN~ OFFICE
LETTER
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/67 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX Page: :~~
===..~==========_a=~-==--=-=-=---==-===--~=-----==-=-=--=--------------------
. FILE: 2021709 -NUMBER:-100027- - -DATE: 01713767---------PAGES~-!---
TITLE/SUBJECT: LETTER FROM RESIDENTS OF MILL CREEK REQUESTING PERMANENT
RELOCAT ION. .
AUTHOR: HAUS\ SYLVESTER & HELEN
ORGANIZATION: NOT lNDICATED
ADDRESSEE: BISHOP MIKE
ORGANIZATION: USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
DOCUMENT TYPE: LETTER
---------------------------------------------------------------------------~~-
FILE: 202170'9
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TY PE :
NUMBER: 100027A DATE: 01/13/67 PAGES:
A REQUEST FOR EXTENDING THE PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD ON THE
MILL CREEK REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/FEASIBILITY STUDY.
BIFOSS R. BEN
ANACONbA - DEER LODGE COUNTY
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
LETTER
.:.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------~-~~~~-
FILE: 2021709
TI TLE/SUB.1ECT :
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100026 DATE: 01/1~/67 PAGES: 2
SUPPORTING THE DRAFT MILL CREEK OPERABLE UNIT RI/FS. NOTES
THAT THE MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL
SCIENCES SUPPORTS ACTIONS WHICH ARE FINAL AND LEAD TO SITE
DELISTING. -
DRYNAN JOHN J.
MONTAN~ DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
ElISHOP fWUKE
USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
LETTER
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~~-~
FILE. 202170~
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR,
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 10002'9 DATE. 01/20/67
OPINIONS ABOUT THE PROEILEMS AND SOLUTIONS IN THE
AREA FROM A CONCERNED CITIZEN. (PORTIONS OF THIS
ARE ILLEGIBLE)
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
LETTER
PAGES: a
MILL CREEK
DOCUMENT
-------------------------------------------------------------------------~-~~~
FILE: 202170~
TI TLE/SUB.1ECT :
AUTHOR:
.ORGANI ZATION:
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100030 DATE: 01/21/67 PAGES: 4
COMMENTS ON THE MILL CREEK RI/FS REPORT. DISCUSSES
RELOCATION 18" REMOVAL AND REVEGETATION AND THE PUEILIC
HEALTH IMPLICATIONS. LISTS COSTS FOR ALTERNATIVES lA, lS3,
12C, AND 6B3. 6B3 WAS CHOSEN BY THE AUTHOR.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
LETTER
---------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~
FILE: 202170~
TI TLE/SUB.1ECT:
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE:
,.~ NUMBER: 100031 DATE: 00/00/00 PAGES: ;2
MR. HANCOCK STATES HIS POSITION CONCERNING HIS PREFERRED
REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVE AND GOES ON TO SAY THAT HE WILL NOT
RELOCATE DURING CLEANUP PROCEDURES. (SHOWS URINARY ARSENIC
LEVELS FOR THE HANCOCK FAMILY FOR JUNE AND OCTOBER)
HANCOCK\ LARRY D. & KIMBERLY A.
NOT INDlCATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
LETTER
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONT~N~ OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/87 ~DMINIStR~TIVE RECORD INDEX Page:l~.
-~.===--=-==========s===.==-===========================================-------
FILE: 20Z1709 NUMBER I 100032 D~TE: 01/2Z/87 P~GES~-3---~
TITLE/SUBJECTI STATES THE POSITION OF ANACONDA-DEER LODGE COUNTY ON THE
- MILL CREEK RI/FS WHICH WAS COMPLETED 8Y THE ANACONDA
MINERALS COMP~NY.
BIFOSS R. BEN
ANACONDA - DEER LODGE COUNTY
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
LETTER
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCU.-,ENT TYPE:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEI 2021709
TIT1.E/SUBJECTI
~UTHOR I
ORG~NIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPEI
NUMBER I 100033 DATE I 01/2S/87 P~GESI 1
OFFICI~L COMMENT STATING THAT NO DIRT CONTAINING HEAVY
MET~LS SHOULD 8E MOVED IN ANY W~Y IN ORDER TO PREVENT
~NY ~IReORNE CONTAMINATION. ALSO'APPLIES TO THE PONOS.
PETERSON PAUL
~RROWHEAb ~PIARIES
NOT INDICATED
USEPA-VIII, MONT~N~ OFFICE
LETTER
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE a 2021709
TITLE/SUBJECT I
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZATIONI
~DDRESSEE:
ORGANIZ~TIONI
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER I 100034 DATE I 01/26/87
TR~NSMITTAL OF MILL CREEK FACT SHEETS MILL CREEK
END~NGERMENT ~SESSMENT~ DRAFT MILL CREEK REMEDI~L
INVESTIG~TION,. DRAFT F~ASIBILITY STUDY REPORT, AND
REPORT SUPPLE~ENT. (NONE ~RE ~TT~CHED>
WARDELL JOHN
USEPA-V~II~ MONTAN~ OFFICE
SCHMIDT" D~80RAH
NOT IND!CATED
LETTER
PAGES: 2
RI/FS
------------------------------------------------~-----------------------------
FILEI 2021709
TIT1.E/SUBJECTI
~UTHORI
ORGANIZATIONI
~DDRESSEEI
ORGANIZ~TIONI
DOCUMENT TYPE I
NUMBER I 10003~ DATE I 01/26/87 PAGES: 2
TRANSMITTAL OF TWO ATTACHMENTS WHICH WERE LEFT OUT OF AN
EARLIER LETTER. THEY INCLUDE THE MILL CREEK FACT SHEET
(~TTACHMENTS NOT INCLUDED>, ~ND ~ LIST OF ~DDRESSEES.
W~RDELL JOHN
USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
H~RRINGTON1. D~N
NOT INDICATED
LETTER
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEI 2021709
TITL.E/SUBJECTI
~UTHORI
ORGANIZ~TIONI
~DDRESSEEI
ORG~NIZATIONI
DOCUMENT TYPE,
NUMBER I 100036
ST~TES RESIDENTS PREFERENCE
TH~T THEY DO NOT WANT TO 8E
DUDACKb ~LLEN P. , lONE 8.
NOT IN IC~TED
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDICATED
LETTER
DATE I 01/26/87E PAGES I 1
OF REMEDIAL ACTION ~ND NOTES
RELOCATED.
-------------~---------------------------------------------------------------
FILEI 2021709
TIT1.E/SUBJECT.
~UTHOR a
ORGANIt~TIONI
~DDRESSEEr
ORG~NIZ~TIONI
DOCUMENT TYPE I
NUMBER I 100037 DATE I
HANDWRITTEN RESULTS OF ~ TELEPHONE
ReSIDENTS REGU~RDING RELOCATION.
NOT INOIC~TED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDICATED
TELEPHONE CONVERSATION
01/29/87 PAGES: 4
SURVEY OF ~ILL CREEK
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/87 ADMINISTRATIVE R~CORD INDEX P~ge: l~:
===============z===-a--:----=------------------=-----------------------------
FILE: 2021709 - NUMBER7 100038---------DATE7-02/02/87---------PAGES~-~--
TITLE/SUBJECT: PROPERTY OWNERS' FEELINGS ABOUT REDUCED PROPERTY
~UTHOR HV~LUE AND HIS CHOICE OF REMEDIAL ACTION.
~ : ~MEL EDWIN J.
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: LETTER
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021709
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TV PE :
NUMBER: 100039 DATE: 02/03/87 PAGES: 1
TRANSMITTAL OF THE PUBLIC COMMENTS OF 30 RESIDENT
FAMILIES OF THE MILL CREEK VALLEY AND A LIST OF THE THIRTY
FAMILIES REPRESENTED BY KNIGHT, D~HOOD, MCLEAN, AND
EVERETT.
DAYTON, RAY J.
KNIGHT, DAHOOD, McLEAN & EVERETT
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
LETTER
----------------------------~---------------------------------------~-----~~~=
FILE: 202170~
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORG~NIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TV PE :
NUMBER: 100040 D~TE: 00/00/00
A LIST OF THIRTY MILL CREEK VALLEY RESIDENTS
REPRESENTED BY KNIGHT, DAHOOD, MCLEAN, AND EVERETT.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MISCELLANEOUS
PAGES ~ 1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------~~
FILE: 202170~
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORG~NIZATION:
~ ADDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZATION:
CCUMENT TVPE:
NUMBER: 100041 DATE: 00/00/00
"PUBLIC COMMENTS OF MILL CREEK RESIDENTS"
NOT INDICATED
KNIGHT, DAHOOD, McLEAN & EVERETT
BISHOP MIKE
USE~A-VIIIb MONTANA OFFICE
RE~ORT/STU Y
~AGES: 67
------------------------------------------------~---------------------------~-
FILE: 202170~
TI TLE/SUBJECT :
AUTHOR:
ORG~NIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TVPE:
NUMBER: 100043 DATE: 00/00/00 PAGES: 7
~~~Y~~t~~:N g~EB~~~tO~L~b ~~~~~~1T~C~XE~~~~b~I~~~ ~~~ENIC
MCL GRANTED BY THE STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA TO LIDGERWOOD.
~~~c~~giC~~~D
CALLAWAY REX
USEPA-VIiI, OFFICE OF REGIONAL COUNSEL
MEMO
----------------------------------------------------------------------------~-
FILE: 202170~
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR:
ORG~NIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TY PE :
NUMBER. 100044 D~TE: 02/0~/87 PAGES: 3
HISTORV AND REVIEW OF THE THREE FORKS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY~
REVEALING THAT THREE FORKS WAS NEVER ISSUED AN EXEMPTION uR
VARIANCE FROM THE ARSENIC MCL.
EN8.E BILL
USE~~VIII,. MONTANA OFFICE
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
MEMO
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/67 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX Page:12:
-8..-=====~======~.=-===.==..s-====a._===8.=.=.a_._=_.==z=======-==-----------
FILE~ 2021709 NUMBER: 100045 DATE: 10/19/77E PAGES~-31--
TITLE/SUBJECT: A GROUP OF BACKGROUND MATERIAL REGARDING MAXIMUM CONTAINMENT j
LEVEL OF ARSENIC IN DRINKING WATER AND EXEMPTIONS THEREOF. ,
DOCUMENT CONTAINS AN ENGINEERING REPORT ON DOMESTIC WATER
QUALITY REGULATIONS IN CALIFORNIA,. AND FINDINGS OF FACT
BEFORE THE NEVADA STATE BOARD OF HEALTH.
GASTON JOHN M.
CITY OF BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA, DEPT. OF HEALTH SERVICES
ASLESEN, ROBERT ~.
CITY OF HANFORD, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
LETTER
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 2021709
TITL.E/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 10004~A DATE. 02/06/67 PAGES:
SUMMARY OF COMMUNITY CONCERNS. INCLUDES DIFFICULTY
IN UNDERSTANDING THE EXACT RISKS AS STATED IN THE
~6~6Ry~i~KA~gDe~~~~~i~6N~Sf~g5~~gT~IEcA~I~~~~ ~~gNOMIC
DEVELOPMENTl AND DIMINISHING LAND VAL.UES.
ASPHOLM .AUDREY
ANACONDA COMMUNITY RELATIONS
~6~ZY~bI~~tiD .
J'ltEMO
~
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FIL.E. 2021709
TITL.E/SUB.JECT.
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE,
NUMBER. 10004~B DATE. 03/26/87 PAGES:
ACKNOWLEDGES RECEIPT OF LETTER DISCUSSING PROBL.EMS IN
MIL.L. CREEK AND STATING THAT COPIES HAVE BEEN FORWARDED
TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL. PROTECTION AGENCY AND THE ANACONDA
MINERAL.S COMPANY.
BIFOSS R. BEN
ANACONDA - DEER LODGE COUNTY
HARRIS TIMOTHY L.
CITIZEN
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONT~N~ OPER~BLE UNIT
10/01/87 ~DMINISTR~TIVE RECORD INDEX P~ge:l:
.~=a==s========a==aa=a=_.===a==.==._.=._=._=====a====.=a==z====~=~===========:
FILE: 20Z1709 NUMBER: 100048 D~TE: 06/10/87 P~GES: 1
TITLE/SUBJECT: REG~RDING REMEDI~L ACTIONS AT THE ANACONDA SMELTER SITE.
INDICATES A MEETING ATTENDED 5/13/87. DISCUSSION OF REDUCING
HAZARDS ASSOCIATED WITH TAILINGS IN THE CLARK FORK RIVER
DRAINAGE FLOODPLAIN.. RE~UESTS AN OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW AND
COMMENT ON THE REMEDIAL DESIGN DRAFT.
PHILLIPS GLENN
MONTANA bEPARTMENT OF FISH, WILDLIFE AND PARKS
ElISHOP MIKE
USEPA~VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
MEMO
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZ~TION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORGANIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021709
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZ~TION :
~DDRESSEE:
ORGANIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100049 DATE: 06/10/87 PAGES: 3
TRANSMITT~L OF ~N INTER~GENCY ~GREEMENT BETWEEN THE U. S.
FISH ~ND WILDLIFE SERVICE AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY CONCERNING SUPPORT EXPERTISE FOR THE REMEDIAL
INVESTIGATION/FEASIBILITY STUDIES, ~NACONDA SMELTER SUPER-
FUND PROJECT.
ElISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIII, MONTAN~ OFFICE
JONES BILL.
U.S. bEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, FISH & WILDLIFE SERV~CE
LETTER .
-------------------------------------------------------------------------~~==~
FILE: 2021709
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZ~TION.
~DDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100050 DATE I 09/06/87 PAGES: 3
REGARDING CONCERN ABOUT THE FIN~L CLEAN-UP DECISION AND A
REQUEST THAT THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ~GENCY ~LLOW THOSE
PEOPLE MAKING FINAL DECISIONS TO READ THE LETTERS CONVEYED
BY THE MILL CREEK RESIDENTS.
PATTERSON PEG
CITIZEN(S~ OF ~NACOND~, MONTANA
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIII, MONT~N~ OFFICE
LETTER
----------------------------------------------------------------------------~~
~FILE I 2021710
,T I TLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORG~NIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TY PE :
NUMBER: 100001 DATE: 06/05/66 PAGES: 1
RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR INFORMATION CONCERNING THE TIMING
~ND ~MOUNT OF STATE MATCH NEEDED FOR PERMANENT CLEANUP AND
RELOCATION AT THE MILL CREEK, MONT~NA SITE
WARDELL JOHN
USEPA-V~IIH MONTAN~ OFFICE
~a~~~~~ 5~P~RfMENT OF HEALTH & ENVIRONMENT~L SCIENCES
LETTER
----------------------------------------------------------------------------~~
FILE: 2021710
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORG~NIZATION:
ADDRESSEE I
ORG~NIZATIONI
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100002 DATE: 06/18/86 PAGES. 1
WRITTEN ON BEHALF OF THE RESIDENTS OF THE MILL CREEK
COMMUNITY TO TRY ~ND EXPEDITE THE REMAINING ANALYSIS AND
EV~LUATION OF REMEDI~L ALTERN~TIVES FOR THE SUPERFUND
INVESTIGATION WHICH IS UNDERW~Y.
SCHWINDEN TED -
S~TE OF ~ONTANA, OFFICE OF THE~GOVERNOR
WEt.LES" JOHN G.
US£AA-v I I I
LETTER
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 202171 0
TI TLE/SUBJECT .
~UTHOR:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
ADDRESSEE.
DORG~N I ZAT I ON:
OCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100003 D~TEI 07/10/86E PAGES: 2
RESPONSE TO THE GOVERNORS LETTER CONCERNING QUICK CORRECTIVE
ACTION IN MILL CREEK. BREAKDOWN OF ACTIONS TAKEN THOSE
UNDERWAY AND APPROXIMATE TIME FRAMES FOR FUTURE ACTION.
WELLES" JOHN G.
USEPA-vIII
SCHWINDEN TED
STATE OF ~ONTANA, OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
LETTER
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONT~N~ O~ER~BLE UNIT
10/01/67 ~DMINIStR~TIVE RECORD INDEX P~ge:13:
---=2-------==========================-==================================-----
FILE'-2021710 NUMBERr 100004 D~TEr 07/14/66 P~GESr-l---
tITLE/SUBJECTr REQUESTS THE EP~ TO MOVE AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE TO A
SOLUTION TO PROBLEMS AT MILL CREEK.
AUTHOR: WILLIAM~ PAT
ORG~NIZATION: U.S. CONGRESS
ADDRESSEE: THOMAS, LEE
ORGANIZATION: USEPA
DOCUMENT TY~E: LETTER
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEr 2021710
TITLE/SUBJECTr
~UTHOR:
ORG~NIZ~TIONr
ADDRESSEEr
ORG~NIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TY~E:
NUMBER: 100005 D~TE: 06/13/66 ~AGES: 4
REQUESTS A RESPONSE TO THREE KEY COORDINATION ISSUES WHICH
WERE DISCUSSED AT ~ MEETING ON MAY 21 1966 CONCERNING
PERMANENT RELOCATION OF RESIDENTS OF MILL CREEK AS A VIABLE
PERMANENT REMEDY. RES~ONSE IS RE~UESTED BY SE~T. 2, 1966.
WARDELL JOHN
USEPA-V~II,. MONTANA OFFICE
DRYNAN JOI"IN J.
HAUS~ SYLVESTER & ELLEN
LETTt:.R
-----------------------------------------------------------------------~------
FILEI 2021710
TITLE/SUBJECT I
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
~DDRESSEEI
ORG~NIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPEI
NUMBER: 100006 DATE I 08/1~/66 -. - P~GESr 1
REQUESTS INFORMATION CONC£RNING THE COUNTY'S ~UTHORITY TO
CONDEMN ~RIVATE ~RO~ERTY WHEN DEALING WITH ~UBLIC HEALTH
~ROeLEMS AND WOULD LIKE ~ DISCUSSION RELEVANT TO
STATUTORY AUHORITY AND CASE L~W. ~UTHOR WOULD LIKE A RE-
SPONSE BY SEPT. 23, 1966 WHICH IS THE RELEASE OF DRAFT RIFS
BISHO~ MIKE
USEPA-VIII, MONT~N~ OFFICE
BIFOSS R. BEN
AN~CONbA - DEER LODGE COUNTY
LETTER
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEI 2021710
TITLE/SU8.JECTI
~UTHOR:
ORG~NIZATION:
~DDRESSEEI
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER I 100007 DATE I 08/26/66 P~GES: 1
~ REQUEST FOR SU~~ORT OF ~N~CONDA-DEER LODGE COUNTY TO GAIN
~SSISTANCE FROM THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE IN ORDER TO
GAIN THE PROPER LEGAL OPINION CONCERNING THE CONDEMNATION
OF PRIVATE ~RO~ERTY BASED ON A ~UBLIC HEALTH PROBLEM
~~~8a:b\Ii~H~ONT~N~ OFFICE
~~~~~~A 5~E~RfMENT OF HEALTH & ENVIRONMENT~L SCIENCES
LETTER
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEI 2021710
TITLE/SU8.JECTI
~UTHORI
ORG~NIZATIONa
~DDRESSEEI
ORGANIZATIONa
DOCUMENT TYPE'
---------------
FILEr 2021710
TITLE/SUBJECTr
~UTHORI
ORG~NIZATION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATIONr
DOCUMENT TY~EI
NUMBERs 100008 DATE I 08/27/66 P~GES: 2
CONCERNS THE USE OF INSTITUTION~L CONTROLS IN REMEDIAL
ACTIONS WITH AMC/ARCO AND REQUESTS CERTIFICATION OF THESE
CONTROLS BY THE STATE PRIOR TO THE DRAFT MILL CREEK RI/FS
BEING SENT TO ~UBLIC NOTICE
~8~:b\Ii~H~ONT~N~ OFFICE
_VN~N JOI"IN J.
MDNT~NA DEPARTMENT OF HE~LTH & ENVIRONMENT~~ SCIENCES
LETTER
-----------------------------------------------------------
NUMBERr 10000a~ DATEs 08/27/66 P~GES: 4
RES~ONSE TO AN 6/13/66 REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION OF THE
STATE'S ~OSITION REGARDING CONDEMNATION AUTHORITY~ STATE
MATCH FOR EPA EXPENDITURES, AND ST~TE'S WILLIGNES~ TO
ACCEPT TITLE.
DRYNAN JOHN J.
MONTANA DEP~RTMENT OF HEALTH & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
WARDELL JOHN
USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
LETTER
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
~ILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/87 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX Page:12~
s================---------==--=----------:-=---======-------------==----------
IFILE: 2021710 ----NUMBER:-100008S----- - DATE: 08/29/86-------- PAGES~-11--
TITLE/SUBJECT: TRANSMITTAL OF 8/28/86 MEMO TO URBAN L. ROTH FROM JOHN P.
~UTuOR DAVIS REGARDING ARCO VS. STATE.
~ n : ROTH URBAN L. .
ORGANIZATION: POORE,. ROTH1 & ROBINSON, P.C.
ADDRESSEE: ORR KATHERINE
ORGANIZATION: MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
DOCUMENT TYPE: LETTER
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------~
FILE: 2021 7 1 0
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100008C DATE: 09/12/86E PAGES: 11
REGARDING MONTANA'S AUTHORITY IN SUPPORT OF RESTRICIVE
COVENANTS IN DEEDS AND ZONING AS INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MEMO
---------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~.
FILE: 2021710
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGAN I ZAT I ON:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 1000080 DATE: 09/1~/86 PAGES: 1
CLARIFICATION OF LETTERS DATED 8/13/86'1" 8/26/86~ AND 8/27/86
REQUESTING LEGAL OPINIONS CONCERNING S ATE AND ~OUNTY
CONDEMNATION POWERS AND THE USE OF INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS IN
CERCLA REMEDIES. THIS CERTIFICATION NEEDS TO BE ISSUED 8Y
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OR HIS DELEGATE.
WARDELl. JOHN
USEPA-V~II,. MONTANA OFFICE
DRYNAN JOHN J.
MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
LETTER
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~~
FILE: 2021 7 1 121
TITLE/SUBJECT I
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TV PE :
NUMBER: 100008E DATE: 09/1~/86 P~ESr 3
THREE COPIES OF A REQUEST FOR THE MONTANA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S
OFFICE TO PROMPTLY RESOLVE THREE SETS OF ISSUES REGARDING
STATE LAW. INDICATES THAT THE REQUEST WAS FORWARDED
THROUGH THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL
SC I ENCES.
SPEICHER THOMAS A.
USEPA-VIIIL OFFICE OF REGIONAL COUNSEL
DRISCOLL ~ATRICK
MONTANA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
LETTER
----------------------------------------------------------------------------~~
FILE: 202171 0
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGAN I ZAT I ON:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE I
NU~BER: 100008F DATE: 09/23/86 P~GES: 2
SUMMARY OF A TELEPHONE CALL REGARDING A MEMORANDUM (9/12/86)
WHICH DISCUSSES THE USE OF "INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS" SUCH AS
RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS AND ZONING. MONTANA STATE DEPARTMENT
OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES LEGAL DIVISION PROVIDES
COMMENTS ON THE LIMITATIONS OF STATE LAW.
ORR KATHERINE
~tANA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
RO"ftot.. URBAN L.
~~ ROTH, & ROBINSON, P.C.
LEtTEt<
---------------~------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021710
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANI ZAT I ON:
ADDRESSEE;
DORGAN I ZAT I ON:
OCUMENT TYPE I
NUMBER I 100008G DATEI 11/24/86 P~GESJ Z
REGARDING QUESTIONS THE OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR OF MONTANA
NEEDS ANSWERS TO ABOUT MILL CREEK THE CONDEMNATION OF
PROPERTY, AND THE STATE'S ROLEL R~SPONSIBILITY AND LIABILITY
IN ORDER TO RESPOND TO A FEMA ~EQUEST OF THE STATE'S WILL-
INGNESS TO PARTICIPATE IN PERMANENT RELOCATION OF RESIDENTS.
SCHW I NDEN TED.
STATE OF MONTANA, OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
WELLES" JOHN G.
USEPA-vIII
LETTER
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------~
-------
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK ~ONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/87 AD~INISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX Page:13~
.._8.-..=.a._z..s=-.-a=~..__.2=asa====.=.======a.~===~====8=~=.=_=============
FILE. 20Z1710 NUMBER. 100009H DATE. 02/17/87 PAGES:
TITLE/SUBJECT. ROUTING AND TRANSMITTAL SLIP CONTAINING THE REMARKS:
CDM - P~EASE DELIVER TO MIKE BISHOP - EPA MONTANA
OFFICE (EXPRESS OR HAND CARRY).
CALLAWAYs,. REX
NOT INDII.,;ATED
ERICSON JAMES W.
CAMP DRESSER & McKEE, INC. (CDM)
ROUTING SLIP
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 2021710
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER: 1000081 DATE. 07/30/87 PAGES: 1
CONCERNING THE DRAFT COPIES OF THE RECORD OF DECISION AND
THE ANALYSIS OF APPLICABLE OR RELEVANT AND APPROPRIATE STATE
AND FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE ~ILL CREEK OPERA8LE UNIT OF
THE ANACONDA S~ELTER SITE WHICH HAVE NOT BEEN REVIEWED BY
EPA HEADQUARTERS WHOSE COMMENTS ~AY RESULT IN ~INOR CHANGES.
ElISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIII,. MONTANA OFFICE
RUBICH ~I""E
~ONTAN~ DEPART~ENT OF HEALTH & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
LETTER
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 2021710
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 100008J DATE. 07/30/87 PAGES: 1
CONCERNING THE DRAFT COPIES OF THE RECORD OF DECISION AND
THE ANALYSIS OF APPLICABLE OR RELEVANT AND APPROPRIATE STATE
AND FEDERAL REQUIRE~ENTS FOR THE MILL CREEK OPERABLE UNIT OF
THE ANACONDA SMELTER SITE WHICH HAVE NOT BEEN REVIEWED BY
EPA HEADQUARTERS WHOSE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN MINOR CHANGES.
BISHOP, MIKE
USEPA-VIII,. MONTANA OFFICE
RUBICH MIKE
MONTAN~ DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
LETTER
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 2021710
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATIONs
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 10000~ DATE. 18/14/87 PAGES. 1
AS A FOLLOW UP TO THE PHONE CONVERSATION OF JULY 29s,. 1987 A
DISCUSSION WITH GOVERNER SCHWINDEN TOOK PLACE AND H~
EXPRESSED A WILLINGNESS TO HAVE THE STATE TAKE TITLE TO
PROPERTY AND TO SEEK STATUTORY AUTHORITY FOR PROPERTY
CONDEMNATION AS NEEDED TO ACCOMPLISH RE~EDIAL ACTIONS.
JOHNSON\ HOWARD .
NOT IND!C~TED
ROBINSON CHARLES
FEDERAL E~ERGENCY MANAGE~ENT AGENCY
LETTER
-----------------------~-----------------------------------------------------
FILE. 2021710
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 100010 DATE. 09/18/87
ACKNOWLEDGING THE RECEIPT OF A COpy OF THE EPA'S
NOTIFICATION TO ATL~NTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY PURSUANT
SECTION 122(E) OF CERCL~ AT THE ~ILL CREEK OPERABLE
acoPY OF NOTIFICATION IS ATTACHED>
S"l'EWART ROBERT F.
~. DE~ARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
SCHERER JIM
USEPA-vlII
LETTER
PAGES. 4
TO
UN IT.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK~ MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/87 ADMINISrRATIVE RECORD INDEX P~ge:l;
.....=======.====a____~_=.__...-._=-==.~-====~=====a============Z2===========
FILE: 20Z1711 NUMBER: 100001 DATE I 08/13/87 PAGES: 1
~ITLE/SUBJECTI STATES THAT THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL
SCIENCES SUPPORTS STATE CONCURRENCE WITH THE ROD/ARAR'S
DOCUMENTS. THE DEPARTMENT FEELS THAT RELOCATION PROVIDES
THE MOST EFFECTIVE MEANS OF REDUCING HEALTH RISK TO MILL
CREEK RESIDENTS
DRvNAN JOHN J.
MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
SCHWINDEN TED
STATE OF MONTANA, OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
MEMO
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE I
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE I 2021 71 1
T I TLE/SU8JECT I
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATIONI
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATIONI
DOCUMENT TY PE :
NUM8ERI 100003 DATE I 08/24/87 PAGES: 1
NOTICE THAT REVIEW OF THE MILL CREEK ROD/ARAR DRAFT
DOCUMENTS, BY CONCERNED BRANCHES OF STATE GOVERNMENT,. HAS
BEEN COMP~ETED AND THAT THE STATE OF MONTANA WILL CONCUR
WITH THE ROD. NOTES CONCERN FOR THE RESIDENTS OF MILL CREEK
AND THEIR PROPER TREATMENT
DRYNAN JOHN J.
STATE bEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
SCHERER" JIM
USEPA-VIII
LETTER
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~-~~
FILEI 2021712
T~Tl...EJSU8JECT I
AUTHOR I
ORGAN I ZATION I
ADDRESSEE I
ORGANIZATIONI
DOCUMENT TYPE I
NUM8ERI 300001 DATE I 04/29/86 PAGES I ~
LETTER GIVING ARCO THE OPPORTUNITY TO CONDUCT REMOVAL
ATIVITIES INCLUDING TEMPORARY EVACUATION AND ROAD DUST
SUPPRESS ION.
DUPREY,. ROBERT L.
USEPA-vIII
COX RALPH
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC)
LETTER
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------~
~I LE I 2021 7 12
ITLE/SUBJECTI
AUTHOR I
ORGAN I ZAT I ON:
ADDRESSEE I
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TY PE :
NUMBER I 300002 DATE I 06/10/86 E PAGES: 1
TRANSMITTAL OF THE CERCLA SECTION 106 ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER
ON CONSENT.
DUPREY,. ROBERT L.
USEPA-vIII
KRABLIN RICHARD
ANACOND~ MINERALS COMPANY (AMC)
LETTER
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------~
FILE I 2021712
T ITLE/SUBJECT I
AUTHOR:
ORGAN I ZATION.
ADDRESSEE I
ORGAN I ZATION I
DOCUMENT TY PE I
NUMBER I 300003 DATE. 06/09/86 P~GESI 21
CERCLA SECTION 106 ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER ON CONSENT PERTAIN-
ING TO ROAD DUST SUPPRESSION.
NOT INDICATED .
USEPA-VIII
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
CaJRT DOCUMENT
---------------~---------------------------------------------------------~~
FILE I 2021712
TITLE/SU8JECT I
AUTHOR I
ORGANI ZATI ON I
ADDRESSEE:
DORGAN I ZAT I ON:
OCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER I 300004 DATE. 06/23/86 E PAGES, 1
TRANSMITTAL OF CORRECTED P~GES OF THE CERCLA SECTION 106
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER ON CONSENT AND A COpy OF ATTACHMENT B.
DUPREY ROBERT L.
USEPA REGION VIII, WASTE MANAGEMENT DIVISION
KRABLIN RICHARD
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC>
LETTER
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONT~N~ OPER~BLE UNIT
10/01/87 ~DMINIStR~TIVE RECORD INDEX P~ge:12~
.-=-_.===~==2==a==-_==s~_==a_.-.=========.==_=a~.-===========================:
FILE: 2021712 NUMBER: 300005 D~T~: 00/00/00 P~GES: S
TITLE/SUBJECT. CORRECTED PAGES OF THE CERCLA SECTION 10& ADMINISTRATIVE
ORDER ON CONSENT ~ND ATTACHMENT B OF TH~T ORDER.
~UTHOR: NOT INDICATED'
ORGANIZ~TION: USEPA-VIII
~DDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZ~TION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: COURT DOCUMENT
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORG~NIZ~TION.
~DDRESSEE.
ORG~NIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER: 300006 D~TE: 0~/18/87 P~GES: 1
ADVISING THAT AMC HAS COMPLETED THE DUST SUPPRESSANT AP~LI-
CATION, ~S REQUIRED IN THE ~DMINISTRATIVE ORDER ON CONSENT,
BY M~Y 301. 1987.
DAVIS J~I,,;K R.
AN~CONDA MINER~LS COMP~NY (~MC)
CRISLER CHERYL
USEPA~ OFFICE OF EMERGENCY AND REMEDIAL RESPONSE
LETTEr<
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021712
TITL.E/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORG~NIZATION:
~DDRESSEEI
ORG~NIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPEI
NUMBER: 300007 DATE I 10/22/86 PAGES: 2
~DVISING THAT ~MC H~S COMPLETED THE DUST SUPPRESS~NT ~PPLI-
CATION TO PUBLIC RO~DS ~ND PRIVATE DRIVEW~YS ~S RECUIRED
IN THE ~DMINISTRATIVE ORDER ON CONSENT, BY OCTOBER 30, 1966.
DAV I S .JACK R.
ANACOND~ MINER~LS COMPANY (AMC) .
CRISLER CHERYL
USEPA~ OFFICE OF EMERGENCY AND REMEDIAL RESPONSE
LETTEr<
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FIL.EI 2021712
TITL.E/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR I
ORGANIZ~TIONI
~DDRESSEE.
ORG~NIZATIONI
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER: 300008 DATE I 06/30/86 E PAGES: 3
AMENDMENT ~ND CHANGE TO SCOPE OF WORK FOR REMOV~L ACTIONS AT
THE MILL CREEK MONT~NA SITE. ~S A RESULT OF THfS CHANGE
THE NUMBER OF FAMILIES IDENTIFIED FOR TEMPORARY RELOCATION
IN THE ORIGINAL ACTION MEMORANDUM (04/29/86) IS EXPECTED TO
INCREASE.
.JONES RICHARD
USEPA;. OFFICE OF EMERGENCY ~ND REMEDIAL RESPONSE
DUPREY ROBERT L.
USEPA REGION VIII, W~STE MANAGEMENT DIVISION
MEMO
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021712 NUMBER: 300009 DATE I 04/29/87 E PAGES. 4
TITL.E/SUBJECTI INCREASE OF CEILING COSTS FOR REMOVAL ~CTION ~T MILL CREEK.
MONTANA SITE IN ORDER TO CONTINUE THE TEMPOR~RY RELOCATION
OF RESIDENTS FROM MILL CREEK UNTIL A REMEDY IS SELECTED AND
IMPLEMENTED.
AUTHOR: JONES RICHARD
ORGANIZATION: USEPA;. OFFICE OF EMERGENCY AND REMEDIAL. RESPONSE
ADDRESSEE. DUPREY ROBERT L.
ORGANIZATIONr~PA REGION VIII, WASTE M~NAGEMENT DIVISION
DOCUMENT TYP£.~
------------ ~w ------------------------------------------------------------
,,-
.-1. .
FILE. 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT.
~UTHORz
ORG~NIZATION.
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATIONz
DOCUMENT TYPEz
NUMBER I 300010 . DATE I 12/20/e~ PAGES I 2
PROVIDES A LISTING OF HYGIENE MEASURES TO HELP RESIDENTS OF
MILL CREEK MINIMIZE THEIR EXPOSURE TO CONTAMINATED SOIL AND
DUST. ~LSO PROVIDES A SUMMARY OF ARSENIC LEVELS IN CHILD-
REN'S URINE IN THE ANACONDA AREA (198~).
B I SHOP" MIKE
USEPA-vIII
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
LETTER
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
~ILL CREEK MONT~NA OPER~BLE UNIT
10/01/87 ~DMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX P~ge:::'
==--===========~==-~--==_aa_..================================~==============:
FILE: 2021712 NUMBER: 300011 DATE: 09/0~/86 PAGES: 2
. TITLE/SUBJECT: CONCLUSIONS ~ND RECOMMENDATIONS OF A HEALTH ASSESSMENT PER-
FORMED BY ASTDR ~T EPA'S REQUEST. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
DOCUMENTS REVIEWED, AND A DISCUSSION OF THE CONCLUSIONS AL=:
PROV I DED.
LYBARGER JEFFREY A. (M. D. )
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
MCGEEHIN~ MICHAEL
USEPA-VI1I
MEMO
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCU,.,ENT TYPE:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021712
TI TLE/SUBJECT :
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZ~TION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 300012 DATE: 02/0~/86 PAGES: 2
REQUEST BY THE ENVIRON,.,ENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL THAT EPA PRC-
VIDE: A WRITTEN PLAN OF ACTION~ A "STANDARD OF CLEANLINES~
FOR THE CLE~NUP, AND FOLLOWUP MuNITORING".
BIFOSS R. 8EN
ANACONbA - DEER LODGE COUNTY
DUPREY R08ERT L.
USEPA ~EGION VIII, WASTE MANAGEMENT DIVISION
LETTER .
------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~~~=
FILE: 2021712
TITL.E/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZATION:
DOCUMENT TY PE I
NUMBER: 300013 DATE: 02/12/86
TRANSMITTAL OF A MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET AND
TION SHEET FOR ,.,ONTANA REFINING COMPANY PRODUCT
STINSON, MARCY
MONTANA REFINING CO.
WINDORSKI JIM
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY CAMC)
LETTER
PAGES: 1
SPECIFICA-
DO-4 OIL.
--------------------------~------------------------------------------------~~~
FILE: 20~1712
TI TLE/SUBJECT :
AUTHOR:
~ORGAN I ZAT I ON:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 300014 DATE I 00/00/00
MATERIAL S~FETY D~TA SHEET AND SPECIFICATION
MONTANA REFINING COMPANY PRODUCT DO-4 OIL.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MISCELLANEOUS
P~GESI .3
SHEET FOR
----------------------~------------------------------------------------------~
FILE: 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT I
AUTHOR:
ORGAN I ZAT I ON:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGAN I ZAT ION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 30001~ D~TE: 02/11/86 PAGES: 1
DISCUSSES OF PRICES AND SHIPPING INFORMATION FOR CENEX
PRODUCT 1007 DUST OIL. ALSO TRANSMITS A MATERIAL SAFETY
D~TA S~EET ON THIS PRODUCT.
SMITH, DARRELL D.
CENEX
WI NDORSK I JIM
ANACOND~ MINERALS CO"'PANY CAMC)
LETTER
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------~
FILE: 2021712 NUMBER: 300016 DATE: 00/00/00 PAGES: 2
TITLE/SUBJECT: -~IAL SAFETY DATA SHEFT FOR CENEX PRODUCT 1007 DUST OIL.
AUTHOR: NOT-: IND I CATED
ORGANIZATION: NOT' INDICATED
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
DORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
OCUMENT TYPE: MISCELLANEOUS
I ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
ANACONDA S~ELTER SITE
~ILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/87 ADNI~ISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX Page:13'
-.-.--.-:-==-----=.-..----..-..--.-=----.......---=====----=========-========:
FILE, 2021712 NUMBER, 300017 DATE. 03/18/86 E PAGES: 1
TITLE/SUBJECT. TRANSMItTAL OF CDC RESPONSE TO THE REQUEST OF THE ENVIRON-
~ENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL OF ANACONDA - DEER LODGE COUNTY FOR
A "HU~AN HEALTH STUDY".
DUPREY ROaERT L.
USEPA REGION VIII, WASTE MANAGEMENT DIVISION
MCGEEHINi MICHAEL
USE PA-V I I
MEMO
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCU~ENT TYPE:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
FILEI 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTJotOR .
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE,
ORGANIZATION,
DOCUMENT TYPE,
NUMBER. 300018 DATE. 03/10/86 PAGES: 1
RESPONSE OF CDC TO THE REQUEST FROM THE ENVIRONMENTAL
ADVISORY COUNCIL OF ANACONDA - DEER LODGE COUNTY FOR THE
CONDUCTION OF A HEALTH STUDY.
BINDER SUE (M.D.)
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
BUYNOWSKI, GEORGE
USEPA
MEMO
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
FILE. 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 300019 DATE. 03/26/86 E
RESPONSE TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL'S
REGARDING THE PROPOSED CLEANUP OF THE ~ILL CREEK
DUPREY ROBERT L. .
USEPA REGION VIII, WASTE ~ANAGEMENT DIVISION
BIFOSS R. BEN
ANACONDA - DEER LODGE COUNTY
LETTER
PAGES: 13
REQUESTS
COMMUNITY.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
FILE. 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER. 300020 DATE. 04/04/86
THE ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL'S RESPONSE
OUTLINED IN LETTER DATED MARCH 26, 1986.
BIFOSS R. BEN
ANACONDA - DEER LODGE COUNTY
DUPREY ROBERT L.
USEPA REGION VIII, WASTE MANAGEMENT DIVISION
LETTER
PAGES: 3
TO OPTIONS
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE,
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUfllENT TYPE.
--------------
FILE. 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION.
DOCU~ENT TYPE.
NUMBER: 300021 DATE.
COM~ENTS ON EPA'S INVESTIGATION OF
CREEK~ MONTANA. ANACONDA DECLINES
EVACUHTE THE HOUSEHOLDS, BUT TAKES
DUST SUPPRESSION.
BOWLIN MIKE R.
ANACONbA MINERALS COMPANY
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
. ~ILL CREEK MONTAN~ OPER~BLE UNIT
10/01/87 ~D~INISTR~TIVE RECORD INDEX P~ge: .
=S_---=========--a=_=---za=_=-.--=-------:-=======--------------------------
FILEs 2021712 NUMBER: 300023------ - DATE: 05/a8/86---------PAGES~-1-
TITLE/SUBJECTI LISTS THE INFORM~TION NEEDED FROM AMC BEFORE THEY CAN PRO-
A CEED WITH ROAD OILING IN THE MILL CREEK AREA.
~UTHOR: PEDERSON DICK
ORG~NIZATION: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
~DDRESSEE: H~LLER PETER H.
ORGANIZ~TION: KARR~ TUTTLE, KOCH, CAMPBELL, MAWER, MORROW & SAX
DOCU~ENT TYPE: LETT~R
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~---
FILEI 20;::1712
TITLE/SUBJECTs
~UTHORI
ORG~IZ~TIONI
ADDRESSEE I
ORG~NIZ~TIONI
DOCU~ENT TYPEI
NU~9ERI 300024 D~TEI 06/05/66 PAGES: 1
CONFIRMATION OF TELEPHONE CONVERSATION ADVISING THAT AMC
WILL INITIATE THE DUST SUPPRESSION APPLICATION IN MILL CREEK
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
D~V I S, JACK R.
AN~COND~ ~INER~LS COMP~NY CAMC)
8ISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIII, MONTANA OFFICE
LETTER
------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~~~-
FILEI 20;!171Z
TITLE/SUBJECT I
AUTHOR:
ORG~NIZATIONI
ADDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZATIONI
DOCUMENT TYPEI
NUMBER I 300025 D~TEI .06/05/86
SUBMISSION OF INFORM~TION NEEDED BY THE STATE OF
WATER QU~LITY BUREAU TO APPROVE DUST SUPPRESSANT
DAVIS JACK R.
ANACONDA MINERALS COMP~NY CAMC)
PEDERSON, DICK
STATE OF MONTANA, WATER QUALITY BUREAU
LETTER
P~GESI ~
MONTANA
APPLICATION
---------------------------------------------~---------------------------~~~~-
FILEI 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
~DDRESSEEI
I ORGAN I ZATION:
DOCUMENT TY PE :
NUMBER: 300026 DATE: 10/14/8~
WELL LOG REPORT SUBMITTED BY AMC.
NOT INDICATED
ANACONDA MINERALS COMP~NY CAMC)
NOT INDICATED
MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF N~TURAL RESOURCES & CONSERVATION
REPORT/STUDV .
PAGES: 1
---------------------------------------------------------------------------~~-
FILEI 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT I
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE I
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 300027 D~TE: 00/00/00
SPECIFICATION SHEET AND M~TERIAL SAFETY DATA
MONTAN~ REFINING COMPANY PRODUCT DO-4 OIL.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MISCELLANEOUS
P~GESI :3
SHEET FOR
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEI 2021712
TITLE/SU8J'ECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZ~TIONI
ADDRESSEE I
ORG~NIZ~TIONs
DOCUMENT TY PE I
NUMBER. 300028 DATE I 06/11/86 E PAGES I 1
TRANSMITTAL OF A DESCRIPTION OF SAMPLE LOCATIONS AT THE
ALZIE LIVELY RESIDENCE AND RESULTS OF SOIL SAMPLE ANALYSES
(NOT ATTACHED) UNSIGNED).
.1DES RICH~RD
USEPA;. OFFICE OF EMERGENCY AND REMEDIAL RESPONSE
LfVELy ALZIE
NOT INbICATED
LETTER
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE I 2021712 NUMBER I 300029 DATE I 06/11/66 E PAGES: 1
TITLE/SUBJECT I TRANSMITTAL OF A DESCRIPTION OF SAMPLE LOCATIONS AT THE
D~HL/FABOR RESIDENCE AND RESULTS OF SOIL SAMPLE ANALYSES
CNOT ATTACHEDl UNSIGNED).
AUTHOR: JONES RICHARu
ORG~NIZATION: USEPA: OFFICE OF EMERGENCY AND REMEDIAL RESPONSE
ADDRESSEE I DAHL\ CLARENCE
ORGANIZ~TION: NOT lNDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE I LETTER
---------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~
-------
~NACONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTAN~ OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/87 ~DMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX Page:12
-s-------===s=========ss========================================------------'-
FILE~-20~1712 NUMBER: 300030 DATE. 06/11/86 E ---PAGES~-l--
TITLE/SUBJECTs TRANSMITTAL OF A DESCRIPTION OF SAMPLE LOCATIONS AT THE
WHITEHEAD RESIDENCE AND RESULTS OF SOIL SAMPLE ANALYSES
(NOT ATTACHEDi UNSIGNED).
JONES RICHARIJ
USEPA;. OFFICE OF EMERGENCY AND REMEDIAL RESPONSE
WHITEHEAD~ WILLIAM
NOT INDIC~TED
LETTER
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEr 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECTs
~UTHORs
ORGANIZ~TIONs
ADDRESSEEs
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 300031 DATE: 06/2~/86 PAGES. a
ADDRESSING INQUIRIES MADE BY MILL CREEK RESIDENTS ASSOCI-
ATION ABOUT DELAYS IN REMEDIAL ACTION ~T THE MILL CREEK SITE
DRYNAN JOHN J.
DEPARTMENT OF HE~LTH ~ND ENVIRONMENT~L SCIENCES
~~~~E~~~~K ~~~IDENTS ~SSOCI~TION
LETTER. .
----------------------------------------------------------------------------_.
FILEr 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECTr
~UTHORs
ORG~NIZATIONs
~DDRESSEEs
ORGANIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TYPEr
NUMBERr 300032 DATEr 07/14/86 PAGESs 1
TRANSMITT~L OF ~ LOS ~NGELES TIMES NEWSP~PER ~RTICLE AND
COMMENTS RELATING TO THAT ~RTICLE.
KRABLIN RICHARD
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY CAMC>
DUPREY ROBERT L.
USEPA REGION VIII, WASTE MANAGEMENT DIVISIO~
LETTER .
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------,
FILEr 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECTs
~UTHOR:
ORG~NIZATIONs
~DDRESSEEs
ORG~NIZATIONr
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBERr 300033
NEWSPAPER ~RTICLE ENTITLED:
MOVED" .
NOT INDICATED
LOS ANGELES TIMES
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
DATEr 07/01/86 PAGES: 1
"FAMILIES NEAR SMELTER TO BE
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEs 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT.
~UTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORG~NIZ~TIONz
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBERs 300034 DATEr 07/22/86
EXPRESSING MILL CREEK RESIDENTS ~SSOCI~TION'S
AMC'S ROAD OILING ACTIVITIES.
PATTERSON PEG
MILL CREEK RESIDENTS ~SSOCIATION
DAVIS JACK R.
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY CAMC>
LETTER
PAGES z 1
OPINION OF
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
FILEr 2021712 NUMBERr 30003~ DATEr 08/01/86
TITLE/SUBJECTr-.i,8JBMISSION OF PROGRESS REPORT NO.1 COVERING THE
~y 1986, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ~DMINISTRATIVE
- SENT.
~UTHORI VIS JACK R.
ORGANIZATION. ~NACCNDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC)
ADDRESSEE. W~RDELL JOHN
ORGANIZATION. USEPA-viII, MONTANA OFFICE
DOCUMENT TYPE: LETTER
PAGES. ;2
MONTH OF
ORDER ON
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
10/01/67 MIL~D~~~1~TR~~~~~N~Eg~~~~~~5E~NIT Page:l~
=====================-==============-==============s========================~~
FILE: ~02171a NUMBER: 300036 D~TE: 09/09/86 P~GES: ~
TITLE/SUBJECT: IN ~CCORD~NCE WITH THE ~DMINISTRATIVE ORDER ON CONSENT~
~MC'S ~DVISING OF ~ DEVI~TION FROM THE WORK PLAN REGARuING
DAT~ V~LID~TION.
D~VIS J~CK R.
~NACOND~ MINER~LS COMPANY (AMC)
WARDELL JOHN
USEPA-V~II, MONT~N~ OFFICE
LETTER
~UTHOR:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR.
ORGANIZ~TION.
ADDRESSEE:
ORGAN I ZAT I ON:
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER: 300037 DATE: 00/00/00 PAGES: 2
NEWS RELEASE ST~TING THAT F~MILIES WITH SMALL CHILDREN WILL
BE GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO TEMPOR~RILY MOVE FROM A COMMU-
NITY CONT~MIN~TED WITH ~RSENIC ~ND OTHER MET~LS.
NOT INDIC~TED
USEPA-VIII
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ~RTICLE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------~~=~-
FILE: 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATIONz
DOCUMENT TY PE :
NUMBER: 300038 DATE: 06/00/6~ E
SUPERFUND PROGR~M F~CT SHEET GIVING ~N OVERVIEW
~ND THE ~N~COND~ SMELTER SUPERFUND SITE.
NOT INDIC~TED
USEP~-VIII
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
PAGES: '+
OF SUPERFUND
------------------------------------------------------------------------~~-~~=
FILE: 2021 71 2
TI TLE/SUBJECT :
~UTHOR:
_ORGANIZATION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZATION:
DOCUMENT TY PE .
NUMBER: 300039 DATE: 07/09/e~ PAGES. 3
F~CT SHEET ON THE AN~COND~ SMELTER SUPERFUND SITE ~DDRESS-
ING URINARY ~RSENIC RESULTS, LOW-LEVEL ~RSENIC EXPOSURE, AND
LONG TERM SOLUTION.
NOT INDICATED
USEPA-VIII
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------~=~
FILEI 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT I
AUTHOR:
OAGAN I ZAT I ON.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE I
NUMBER. 300040
F~CT SHEET DISCUSSING
IN MILL CREEK.
NOT INDIC~TED
USEP~-VIII
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
DATE I 00/00/00 PAGES: 2
THE TEMPORARY RELOCATION OF F~MIlIES
-------------------------------------------------------------------------~~-~~
FILEI 2021712 ~BER: 300041 DATE: 00/00/00 PAGES: 2
TITLE/SUBJECT: FAC~ SHEET DISCUSSING THE TEMPOR~RY RELOCATION OF F~MILIES
IN 1ftLL CREEK.
AUTHOR: NO~INDICATED
ORG~NIZATION: USE~-VIII
~DDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
OAG~NIZATIONI NOT INDIC~TED
DOCUMENT TYPE: REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPER~BLE UNIT
10/01/67 ~DMINISTR~TIVE RECORD INDEX Page:14
=-======-~..==_.--.._._a_==-..===-=aa=_=_====================================:
FILE: 2021712 NUMBER: 300042 DATE: 00/00/00 PAGES: 2
TITLE/SUBJECT: FACT SHEET CONCERNING TEMPORARY RELOCATION OF FAMILIES IN
MILL CREEKL MONTANA. BY THE FEMA.
AUTHOR: NOT INDICArED
ORGANIZATION: USEP~-vIII
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: REPORT/STUDY
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
FILE: 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT I
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION I
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATIONI
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER I 300043 DATE I 08/00/6~ E PAGES: 4
SUPERFUND PROGR~M FACT SHEET ABOUT THE ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
DISCUSSING THE WINTER URINARY ARSENIC STUDY, HEALTH EFFECTS
SOIL STUDYL AND PU~LIC INFORMATION.
NOT INDICATED
USEP~-VIII
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
FILE. 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATIONI
~DDRESSEEI
ORGANIZ~TIONI
DOCUMENT TYPEI
NUMBER I 300044 DATE I 10/00/6~ E PAGES I G
SUPERFUND PROGR~M F~CT SHEET ON THE ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
DISCUSSING THE RE"'EDIAL INVESTIGATION/FE~SIBILITY STUDY.
NOT INDICATED
USEP~-VIII
NOT INDICATED
NOT rNDrC~TCD
REPORT/STUDY
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
FILE. 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT I
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZ~TION:
ADDRESSEE I
ORGANIZATIONI
DOCUMENT TYPE I
NUMBER I 30004~ DATE I 12/10/6~
NOTICE OF A SPECIAL COMMUNITY MEETING CALLED BY THE
ALLOW CDC TO REVIEW WITH THE PUBLIC THE FINDINGS OF
SUMMMER URINARY ARSENIC SURVEY.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MEETING NOTES
PAGES: 1
EPA TO
THE
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------,
FILEI 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT I
AUTHOR I
ORG~NIZATION I
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATIONI
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER I 300046 DATE I 12/10/6~ PAGESs 4
FACT SHEET ON THE AN~CONDA SMELTER SUPERFUND SITE ~DDRESS-
ING CONCERNS OF THE RELEASE OF MET~L CONTA"'INANTS.
NOT INDICATED
USEPA-VIII
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
FILEI 2021712 NUMBER I 300047 DATE. 11/04/6~ E
TITLE/SUBJECT. SUMMARY REPORT ON SITE MONITOR ACTIVITIES.
AUTHOR. ~ INDICATED
ORGANIZATION, ~ INDICATED
ADDRESSEE. NOT INDICATED
ORG~NIZ~TION. NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPEI REPORT/STUDY
PAGES I 1
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------,
FILE I 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT I
AUTHOR I
ORGANIZATION:
~DDRESSEEs
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPEs
NUMBERs 300048 DATEs 12/10/6~ PAGES: 4
FACT SHEET ON THE ~NACOND~ SMELTER SUPERFUND SITE ADDRESS-
ING CONCERNS OF THE RELEASE OF METAL CONTAMIN~NTS.
NOT INDICATED
USEPA-V I I I
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------'
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONT~N~ OPER~BLE UNIT
10/01/67 ~DMINISTR~TIVE RECORD INDEX P~gE lL
===.a_======a-=---=-=------------a-======-----==~8==----------------------- --
FILE: a0Z171a- --- NUMBER~-3000S0 ---DATE: 0s7007~e:-E-------PAGES~-~---
TITLE/SUBJECT: F~CT SHEET DISCUSSING TEMPOR~RY RELOCATION OF MILL CREEK
RES I DENTS.
~UT~OR: NOT INDICATED
ORG~NIZ~TION: USEP~-VIII
~DDRESSEE: NOT INDIC~TED
ORG~NIZATION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: REPORT/STUDY
-------------------------------------------------------------------------~---
FILE: 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UT~OR:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 3000~1 D~TE: 09/00/66 P~GES: 5
SUPERFUND PROGR~M UPD~TE ON T~E ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
~DDRESSING TEMPORARY RELOCATION ON MILL CREEK RESIDENTS
REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/FEASIBILITY STUDY, ~ND PU~LIC CO~ME~r
NOT INDICATED
USEPA-VIII
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------~--~--
FILE: 2021712
T1 TLE/SUBJECT .
~UTHOR:
ORG~NIZ~TION.
~DDRESSEE:
ORGANIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER. 3000~a DATE: 03/10/66
"~N~LYTICAL RESULTS FOR RESIDENTI~L DUST ~ND SOIL
IN ANACOND~, MONT~N~, ~ND SURROUNDING COMMUNITIES
R8-e~11-11"
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
PAGES: 62
SAMPLING
TDD
---------------------------------------------------------------------------~~=
FILE. 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT.
~UT~OR.
~ ORGANIZ~TION:
~DDRESSEE.
ORGANIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TY PE .
NUMBER. 3000~3 DATE: 12/00/e~ P~GES. 28
"SUMM~RY OF ~V~ILA8LE SOILS D~T~", MILL CREEK, MONT~NA, DOC-
UMENT CONTROL NO. BAL TTB-062DO.
NOT INDICATED
TETRA TECH!. INC.
NOT INDICA rED
~NACONDA MINERALS COMPANY CAMC>
REPORT/STUDY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~~
FILE. 2021712
TI TLE/SUBJECT I
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORGANIZ~TION.
DOCUMENT TYPE I
NUMBER. 3000~4 DATE I 00/00/00
~~6~1N~~~EKD~~E5~~!bNLa~A~5s~?iEES~~Eo~~~~6~
AND REASONS WHY.
MUNDSTOCK~ WALTER
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ~RTICLE
PAGES :1
THREAT AS
OF FAMILIES
---------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~
FILE. 2021712 NUMBER: 3000~~ D~TE. 11/23/SS PAGES. 1
TITLE/SUBJECT. -I!IA CONSIDERING MOVING MILL CREEK FAI'ULIES", DISCUSSION OF
~ac~TION BY FORMER LOVE CANAL RESIDENT.
~UT~OR. ~ON RIC~
ORGANIZATION. THE. MONT~NA STANDARD
~DDRESSEE. NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATIONs NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE I NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK'r MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/87 ADMINIS R~TIVE RECORD INDEX Page:14,
-===-============_.=_._.=-_.========.======-=========================-------_.
FILE~ 2021712 NUMBER. -300056 D~TE: 12/20/85 PAGES~-l--'
TITLE/SUBJECT. "MILL CREEK RESIDENTS FIND THEMSELVES IN QUPNDRY".1.
DISCUSS tON OF DIFFERING VIEWS ON THE RELOCATION I~SUE.
~UTHOR: MUNDSTOCK WALTER
ORGANIZATION. THE ANACONDA LEADER
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------,
FILE: 202171Z
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
ORG~NIZ~TION:
~DDRESSEE.
ORGANIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER: 300057 DATE: 01/12/66
"SMELTER HILL ~ A LEG~CY OF DANGERS",. DISCUSSION OF
SMITH'S FEARS OF D~NGER TO HER FAMILY FROM ANACONDA
COMP~NY'S SMELTER.
eg~A~NG~e~~~TIMES
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDIC~TED
NEWSP~PER/JOURN~L ~RTICLE
PAGES: 1
MICHELLE
COPPER
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
FILE. 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
ORG~NIZATION.
~DDRESSEE.
ORGANIZ~TION.
DOCUIENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 300056 DATE. 01/12/66
"~RSENIC: SMELTER HILL LEAVES LEG~CY OF DANGER",
TION OF ~RTICLE CONT~INED ON DOCUMENT NO. 300057.
egiA~NG~E~=ATIMES
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
PAGES. 1
CONTINUA-
-------------------------------------------------------------- .-----.
FILEr 202171Z
TI~SU8JECT.
~UTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 300059 DATE. 01/12/86 PAGES. 1
"ARSENIC: MILL CREEKb MONT.l. IN TURMOIL", CONTINU~TION OF
ARTICLE CONTAINED ON OCUMENr NO. 300057.
eg~A~NG~e~~ATIMES
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
FILE a 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECTs
AUTHOR.
ORG~NIZATIONa
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER a 300060 D~TE. 01/15/66 ~S: 1
"""ILL CREEK RELOCATION QUESTION MAY BE ~NSWERED THURSDAY",
DICUSSION OF RELOC~TION AND RESIDENTS REACTION CONCERNING
THE HIGH URINARY ARSENIC LEVELS.
SIMPSON RICH
THE MONTANA ST~NDARD
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSP~PER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
FILE. 2021712 NUMBER. 300061 DATE. 00/00/00 PAGES. 1
TITLE/SUBJECT, .~ILL CREEK FAMILIES WON'T BE RELOCATED", DISCUSSION OF EPA
~8LIC MEETING.
ORG~N I ~~t~=: .:&A~1 s~a~~~ AN
ADDRESSEE. 'NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION. NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE. NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
-------
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/87 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX Page: 14~
==._---========-.=--z=~.--=~-=.=-----~--=--======-~-------:-------------------
~FILE: 2021712 - -- NUMBER:-300062----- - DATE:-01/15/86 --------PAGES~-l---
TITLE/SUBJECT: "MILL CREEK CLEANUP EPA TO CONSIDER TEMPORARY RELOCATION",
DISCUSSION OF THE TEMPORARY RELOCATION OF MILL RESIDENTS,
NOTIFICATION OF MEETING.
BRIESCH ELLEEN
THE ANACONDA LEADER
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE:
ORGAN I ZAT ION:
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER: 300063 DATE: 01/17/86 PAGES: 1
"MILL CREEK MOVE WON'T COME UNTIL MAYb IF EVER"t DISCUSSION
OF EPA'S FAST TRACK TEAM MEMBERS' 60 AY STUDY LN RELATION
TO FEDERAL CLEANUP.
SI"'PSON RICH
THE MONtANA STANDARD
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------~-~~~
FILE: 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE:
ORGAN I ZAT I ON:
DOCUMENT TY PE .
NUMBER. 300064 DATE: 01/18/86
"RISK OF MILL CREEK 'NOT SERIOUS' "b DISCUSSION OF
ISSUE BY OFFICIALS AND RESIDENTS C NNECTED TO THE
SITE.
NOT INDICATED
THE BILLINGS GAZETTE
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
PAGES! 1
RELOCATION
,.,ILL. CREEK
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~-~=
FILE: 20~1712
TITLE/SUBJECT.
. AUTHOR:
ORG~NI ZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE J
NUMBER: 30006~ DATE: 02/21/86 P~GES: 1
"SUPERFUND CUTS MAY AFFECT RE"'~INING CLE~NU~ ACTIVITIESllt
DISCUSSION OF POSSIBLE FUNDING CUTS ~ND THE ~DVERSE EFFE TS
TO THE EPA.
,.,UNDSTOCK WALTER
THE ANACONDA LEADER
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ~RTICLE
---------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~
FILE: 20~1712 NUMBER: 300066 DATE. 02/21/86 PAGES: 1
TITLE/SUBJECT: "CLEANUP MAY BE DELAYED"J. DISCUSSION OF HUMAN HEALTH STUDY
TO BE CONDUCTED BY THE "'uNTANA STATE HEALTH DEPARTMENT.
AUTHOR: MUNDSTOCK W~LTER
ORG~NIZATION: THE ANACONDA LEADER
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE. NEWSPAPER/JOURN~L ARTICLE
---------------- ~- ~-------------------------------------------------~----~--
..~
FILE: 2021712 ~ NUMBER: 300067 DATE I 03/28/86 PAGES: 1
TITLE/SUBJECT. 8f1tH..L CREEK CLEANUP DELAYED"1. DISCUSSION OF FUNDING OF
SUPERFUND BEING DEL.AYED AND rHE IMPACT ON MILL. CREEK
RESIDENTS.
ORGANI~~+~g~; ~~~P~g~TA~Ac~TANDARD
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/87 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX Page:14~
_a.==2...a==.s=.=~===__.a=..._a.~..==..=._---_._.._.a.=-==.=-==.=~.===========
FILE: ~~21712 . NUMBER: 300068 DATE: 0~/02/86 PAGES: 1 4
TITLE/SUBJECT: "KIDS CAN MOVE WHILE EPA ~ULLS MILL CREEK", DISCUSSION OF
RELOCATION OF FAMILIES WITH YOUNG CHILDREN.
AUTHOR: SIMPSON RICH.
ORGANIZATION: THE MONtANA STANDARD
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 300069 DATE: 0~/30/86
"MILL CREEK MOVING MAY START NEXT WEEK"1. DISCUSSION
ORARY RELOCATION; DISCUSSIONS BETWEEN F~MA AND MILL
RESIDENTS.
SIMPSON RICH
THE MONTANA STANDARD
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
PAGES: 1
OF TEMP-
CREEK
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 300070 DATE: 07/10/86 PAGES: 1
"MILL CREEK RESIDENTS PONDER LEGAL ACTION",. DISCUSSION OF
THE MILL CREEK RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION OBTAINING LEGAL
REPRESENTAT ION.
SIMPSON RICH
THE MONTANA STANDARD
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 300071 DATE: 07/10/86 PAGES: 1
"MILL CREEK RESIDENTS PONDER LEGAL ACTION", DISCUSSION OF
MILL CREEK RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION OBTAINING LEGAL REPRESEN-
TATION. .
SIMPSON RICH
THE MONTANA STANDARD
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEI 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATIONI
DOCUMENT TYPEI
NUMBER: 300072 DATE: 0~/1~/8~ PAGES: 1
AGENDA FOR EPA PORTION OF THE ANACONDA ENVIRONMENTAL
ADVISORY COUNCIL MEETING OF 0~/19/8~.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MEETING NOTES
----~------------------~-----~------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021712 NUMBER I 300073 DATE: 00/00/00 PAGES: 2
TITLE/SUBJECTI~ONDA SUPERFUND SITE REPORT ON PRESENT STATUS AND COMPLE-
TION DATE OF THE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/FEASIBILITY STUDY.
AUTHORI~ INDICATED
ORGANIZATION: NeT INDICATED
ADDRESSEE I NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/87 ADMINIStRATIVE RECORD INDEX P~ge::
.-=a_==========-=====-=8aa_=~-===a=a~====a_=_aa_===========================~~
FILE. 20Z171~ NUMBER. 300074 DATE: 08/15/85 PAGES: ~
.TITLE/SUBJECT: EPA SUMMARY OF ANACONDA - DEER LODGE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL
COUNCIL MEETING OF 08/15/85. TOPICS DISCUSSED WERE RIfFS
UPDATE~ SOILS DATA REPORTt COMMUNITY RELATIONS, ON SCENE
MONITO~ REPORT, AND PUSLI COMMENT.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MEETING NOTES
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 300075 DATE. 09/19/85 PAGES: 1
AGENDA FOR THE EPA PORTION OF THE ANACONDA ENVIRONMENTAL
ADVISORY COUNCIL MEETING OF 09/19/85.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MEETING NOTES
-------~----------------------------------------------------------------~-~~_.
FILE. 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER: 300076 DATE. 07/29/85 E PAGES: 1
SUMMARY REPORT ON-SITE MONITOR ACTIVITIES ANACONDA SMELTER
DEMOLITION PROJECT 07/29/85 - 08/30/85.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
----------------------------------------------------------------------~-~~~~--
FILE. 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
ORGAN I ZAT ION-.
ADDRESSEE:
~ ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER, 300077 DATE. 10/17/85 PAGES: 1
EPA SUMMARY OF ANACONDA - DEER LODGE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL
COUNCIL MEETING OF 10/17/8~~ TOPICS DISCUSSED INCLUDE RI/FS
UPDATEb AND OVERVIEW OF SUR~ACE WATER.
NOT IN IC~TED .
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDIC~TED
"'EETING NOTES
------------~--------------------------------------------------------------~~-
FILE: 20a1712
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER: 300078 DATE. 07/09/8~ ~AGES: 3
"SUrwlMARY RE~ORT ON PRESS BRIEFING AND ~UBLIC ,.,EETING REGARD-
ING THE WINTER URINARY ARSENIC STUDY1 ANACONDA, "'ONTANA,
rwlARCH 1985." INCLUDES LIST OF QUEST!ONS ASKED.
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
/flEETING NOTES
---------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~
FILE. 2021712
TI TLE/SUBJ'ECT .
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER. 300079 DATE. 12/10/85 ~AGES: 11
~ SUMMARY OF ANACONDA - DEER LODGE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL
COUNCIL MEETING OF 12/10/85.
N8T INDIC~TED
NOT NDICATED
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDICATED
MEETING NOTES
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONT~NA OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/87 ADMINIStRATIVE RECORD INDEX Page:14
=-----================_=~==2==a_==a8.=======.================================,
FILE~-~0~171~ NUMBER: 300080 DATE. 06/a0/8S PAGES: 1 .
TITLE/SUBJECT. AGENDA FOR EPA PUBLIC MEETING.
AUTHOR~ NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATIONs NOT INDiCATED
ADDRESSEE. NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION. NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: MEETING NOTES
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 202171~
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORG~NIZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 300081 D~TEs 06/a0/8S PAGES: 2
FACT SHEET FOR ANACONDA SMELTER SUPERFUND SITE SPECIFIC
TOPICS DISCUSSED INCLUDE WINTER URINE ARSENIC STUDY AND EPA
PLANS.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MEETING NOTES
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
FILE. 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATIONs
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBERs 300082 DATE. 06/20/8'
NOTIFICATION OF PUBLIC MEETING TO DISCUSS FINDINGS
WINTER ARSENIC URINE STUDY AND FUTURE ACTIVITIES.
BISHOP MIKE
USEPA-VIIIT MONTANA OFFICE
NOT INDICA ED
NOT INDICATED
MEMO
PAGES: 1
OF THE
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
F I"LE s 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT.
~UTHORs
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPe s
. NUMBERs 300083 DATE. 06/00/8' PAGES: J
"SUPERFUND PROGRAM FACT SHEET", FOR THE ~NACONDA SMELTER
SITE. DISCUSSES THE METHOD BY WHICH THE SUPERFUND PROCESS
WORKS.
NOT INDICATED
USEPA-VIII
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
FILE. 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT.
~UTHOR :
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPEs
NUMBER. 300084
"WETLANDS SOLUTION TO SEWER
OF DUCKS UNLIMITED PROPOSAL
SITE.
SIMPSON RICH
THE MONTANA STAND~RD
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSP~PER/JOURNAL ~RTICLE
DATE. 06/21/8~ PAGES. 1
SNAG LONG TIME AWAV"~ DISCUSSION
FOR WETL~ND USE OF M1LL CREEK
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
FILEs 2021712 NUMBER. 30008~ DATE. 06/21/8' PAGESr 1
TITLE/SUBJECT. "ANACONDA CHILDREN P~SS ARSENIC TESTS", DISCUSSION OF
~SULTS OF CDC SURVEY.
AUTHORI'..}CT INDICATED
ORGANIZ~TION'~ MONTANA STANDARD
ADDRESSEEr'M2T INDICATED
ORG~NIZATIONI NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPEs NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
-------
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/87 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX P~ge:l~E
..a__===========~===-=======__=a=a===============._======-======-=============
FILE: 2021712 NUMBER: 300086 DATE: 06/21/85 PAGES: 2
TITLE/SUBJECT: "ELEVATED ARSENIC LEVELS FOUND IN MILL CREEK CHILDREN",
~UTHO DISCUSSION OF CDC STUDY FINDINGS AND FUTURE ACTIONS.
~ R: MUNDSTOCK WALTER
ORGANIZATION: THE ANACONDA LEADER
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORG~NIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE.:
NUMBER: 300087 DATE: 11/21/8~ PAGES: 2
EPA SUMMARY OF THE ANACONDA - DEER LODGE COUNTY ENVIRON-
MENTAL COUNCIL MEETING TOPICS ADDRESSED WERE: REVIEW OF
JULY URINARY ARSENIC STUDY~ REVIEW OF RI/FS PROCESS, ON
SCENE MONITOR REPORT, AND ~UBLIC COMMENT.
NOT INDICATED
ANACONDA - DEER LODGE COUNTY
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MEETING NOTES
-------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~~-
FILE: 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 300088 D~TE: 08/1~/8~ PAGES. 2
EPA SUMMARY OF THE ANACONDA - DEER LODGE COUNTY ENVIRON-
MENTAL COUNCIL MEETING. TOPICS ADDRESSED INCLUDE RI/FS
UPDATEL SOILS DATA REPORT~ COMMUNITY RELATIONS, ON SCENE
MONITO~ REPORT, AND PUBLI~ COMMENT.
NOT INDICATED
ANACONDA - DEER LODGE COUNTY
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MEETING NOTES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~~
FILE: 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 300089 DATE: 06/01/8~ E PAGES: 1
ENVIRONMENTAL INTERVENTION PILOT STUDY FOR MILL CREEK -
ANACONDA, MONTANAb ADDRESSES METHODS TO REDUCE ARSENIC
EX~OSURE IN THE H ME.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
L.ETTER
------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~~=~
FILE. 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZATIONI
DOCUMENT TYPE.
--------------
FIL.E: 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATIONI
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 300090 DATE: 01/16/86 ~GES: 1
NOTICE OF SPECIAL. MEETING FOR MILL CREEK RESIDENTS TO DIS-
CUSS TEMPORARY RELOCATION. AGENDA FOR EPA PORTION OF THE
ANACONDA ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL MEETING.
NOT INDICATED
USEPA-VIII~ MONTANA OFFICE
NOT INDICA rED
NOT INDICATED
~ER
c -------------------------------------------------------~~=~
.t-
, NUMBER: 300091 DATE: 01/16/86 PAGES: 4
FReT SHEET ON ANACONDA SMELTER SUPERFUND SITE TOPICS ADD-
RESSED INCLUDE EPA/AMC FLUE DUST CONSENT ORDER~ DISCUSSION
OF TEMPORARY RELOCATION OF MILL CREEK RESIDENT~, SPRING
CL.EAN UP~ AND IMPROVED HOUSEKEEPING.
NOT INDI~ATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
AN~CONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/81 ADMINISTR~TIVE RECORD INDEX P~ge:14:
~..=.=======.==-~.._..=...==-===-=============.====~=~==.=.====~=============:
FILE: 202111a NUMBER: 300092 D~TE: 01/16/66 PAGES: 9
TITLE/SUBJECT: EPA SUM~ARY OF MEETING WITH MILL CREFK RESIDENTS AND A
PUBLIC MEETING ON THE MILL CREEK ACTION.
AUTHOR: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION: ANACONDA - DEER LODGE COUNTY
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: MEETING NOTES
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
FILE. 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
ORG~NIZATION:
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 300093 DATE: 01/28/86 PAGES: 1
SUMMARY OF SPECIAL EAC MEETING TO REVIEW THE INFORMATION ON
MILL CREEK PROVIDED AT THE JANUARY 16 1986 PUBLIC MEETING
AND TO DISCUSS MEASURES THE COUNTY/CO~MITTEE SHOULD TAKE
IN THIS PROCESS.
NOT INDICATED
ANACONDA - DEER LODGE COUNTY
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICAT.ED
MEETING NOTES
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021712
TITLE/SU8.1ECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER: 300094 DATE. 03/27/86 PAGES: 1
AGENDA FOR EPA PORTION OF THE ANACONDA ENVIRONMENTAL
ADVISORY MEETING OF MARCH 21, 1986.
NOT INDICATED
USEPA-VIII~ MONTANA OFFICE
NOT INDICA rED
NOT INDICATED
MEETING NOTES
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
FILE: 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
ORG~NIZATION:
ADDRESSEE.
ORG~NIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER: 30009~ DATE. 0~/01/e6 PAGES: 16
SUMMARY OF PRIVATE AND PUBLIC MEETINGS BETWEEN EPA AND MILL
CREEK RESIDENTS AND THE PRESS.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MEETING NOTES
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
FILE: 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR:
ORG~NIZATION.
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 300096 DATE: 0~/21/86 E
MILL CREEK RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION MEETING OF MAY
WHICH DEMANDS WERE MADE FOR RESIDENTS THAT W~NT
RESIDENTS THAT W~NT TO ST~Y, AND RENTERS.
NOT INDICATED
MILL CREFK RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
I"tEETING NOTES
PAGES: 2
28, 1986, AT
TO MOVE,
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
FILE: 2021712 .~~'. NUMBER. 300097 D~TE. 00/00/00
TITLE/SU8JECT,'~ DEpICTING STATUS OF OWNER OR RENTER, ~ND
.-STAY" MOVE~ OR UNDECIDED.
AUTHOR I NOT 1NDICAIED
ORG~NIZ~TION. NOT INDICATED
~DDRESSEEI NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE. M~P/DRAWING/DIAGRAM
PAGES: 1
DECISION TO
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONT~N~ OPER~aLE UNIT
10/01/87 ~DMINIStR~TIVE RECORD INDEX Page:1:~
.._--.===================s__a_.=-._.-====a8a~==~=a===.======z=================
FILE: 2~a1712 NUMBER: 300098 D~TE: 00/00/~~ PAGES: 1
TITLE/SUBJECT: M~P OF MILL CREEK AREA DEPICTING STATUS OF RESIDENTS AS TO
DECISION TO ST~Y, MOVE, UNDECIDED, OR RENTAL WHO WANTS TO
MOVE.
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDICATED
MAP/DR~WING/DI~GRAM
~UTHOR:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZ~TION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 300099 DATE: OS/21/86 E PAGES: 2
MILL CREEK RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION MEETING OF MAY 28, 198~, AT
WHICH DEM~NDS WERE MADE FOR RESIDENTS WHO W~NT TO MOVE,
RESIDENTS WHO W~NT TO ST~Y, ~ND RENTERS.
NOT INDIC~TED
MILL CREEK RESIDENTS ~SSOCIATION .
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDIC~TED
MEETING NOTES
-------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~-~
FILE: 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZ~TION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 300100
MAP DEPICTING RESIDENTS
DECISION TO ST~Y, MOVE,
WANTS TO MOVE.
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDIC~TED
M~P/DRAWING/DI~GR~M
DATE: 00/00/00 P~GES: 1
OF MILL CREEK ARE~ AND STATUS OF
RENTER, UNDECIDED, OR RENTAL WHO
------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~~~~
FILE: 202171:=
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
'DOCUMENT TY PE :
NUMBER: 300101
"OPERATING INSTRUCTION X-MET
REVISION 1~ M~RCH 1985"
NOT INDIC~rED
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDIC~TED
REPORT/STUDY
DATE: 01/01/85 E PAGES: 44
840 PORT~BLE XRF AN~LYZER,
---~------------------------------------------------------------------------~~
FILE: 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZ~TION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 300102 DATE: 02/20/86 PAGES: ~
PHOTOGRAPHS AND ASSOCIATED DESCRIPTIONS OF X-MET 840 AND
RELATED INSTRUMENTATION AND PROCEDURES.
NOT INDIC~TED
USEP~-VIII~ MONTANA OFFICE
NOT INDIC~rED
NOT INDICATED
PHOTO/SLIDE
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------~
FILE: 2021 7 1 2
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGAN I Z~T I ON:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 3012111213
POLLUTION REPORT NO.
ACTION TAKEN, FUTURE
~RMATION.
NCT" .INDIC~TED
NOI" INDICATED
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDIC~TED
POLLUTION REPORT
DATE: 04/29/86 E PAGES: 2
1 INCLUDES DISCUSSION OF SITUATION,
PLANS, AND FISC~L AND C~SE PENDING
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTAN~ OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/87 ADMINIStR~TIVE RECORD INDEX Page:15
===s==========~~====.=~=====SDa===_===-~~..~~a~==z========a==================:
FILE: 202171a NUMBER: 300104 DATE: 05/a~/00 E PAGES: 1
TITLE/SUBJECT: POLLUTIDN REPORT NO.2 INCLUDES DISCUSSIONS ON SITUATION
ACTIONS TAKEN, FUTURE ACTIONS AND FISCAL AND CASE PENDING
I NFORMAT ION.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
POLLUTION REPORT
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021712
TITL.E/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 30010~ DATE: 06/0~/86 E PAGES: 1
POL.LUTION REPORT NO.3 WHICH INCL.UDES DISCUSSIONS ON FEMA
AND CDC INTERVIEWS,. DUST SUPPRESSION ACTIVITIES~ RED CROSS
AND STATE DEPARTMENT COUNSELING AS WEL.L ~S FUTU~E PLANS,
FISCAL. AND CASE PENDING INFORMATION.
NOT INDICATED
USEPA
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
POL.L.UTION REPORT
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
FIL.E: 2021712
TITL.E/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR I
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 300106 DATE: 06/26/86 E PAGES: 1
POL.LUTION REPORT NO.4, WHICH INCL.UDES DISCUSSIONS ABOUT
FEMA TEAM REPLACEMENTS FEMA REVIEW OF INTERVIEWS, CDC
HEAL.TH ASSESSMENT, AMENDMENT TO ACTION MEMORANDUM AS WELL
AS INFORMATION ON FISCAL. AND CASE PENDING.
NOT INDICATED
USEPA .
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
POL.L.UTION REPORT
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FIL.E: 2021712
TITL.E/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 300107 DATE: 07/08/86 E PAGES, 1
POLLUTION REPORT NO. ~\ WHICH INCLUDES DISCUSSIONS ON SIGN-
INGOF THE AMENDED ACTION MEMO ATTACHMENT B OF THE IAG
RESIDENTS ARRANGING THEIR OWN ~OVES,. LETTERS AND CHECKS' SENT
TO. RESIDENTS~ CONTINUED CONTACT TO ~INIMIZE CONFUSION, AND
INFORMATION uN FUTURE PLANS ~ND C~SE PENDING.
NOT INDICATED
USEPA
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDICATED
POLLUTION REPORT
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FIL.E: 2021712 NUMBER: 300108 DATE: 07/23/86 E PAGES: 1
TITL.E/SUBJECT. POL.LUTION REPORT NO. 6~ WHICH INCLUDES DISCUSSIONS ON PUBLIC
MEETINGS, MOVING EXPEN~E CHECKS~ RESIDENTS ~PPROVED FOR RE-
LOCATION PROBL.EMS WITH OIL COArING APPLIED BY THE COUNTY
HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT AS WELL AS INFORMATION ABOUT FUTURE PLANS
~D CASE PENDING.
~UTHC8t~ T I ND I CATED
ORGANIZATION,. T INDIC~TED
ADDRESSEE. ""MOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION. NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: POLLUTION REPORT
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 2021712
TITL.E/SUBJECTz
AUTHORs
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 300109 DATE: 08/e7/86 E P~ESI 1
POLREP NO.7 INCLUDES DISCUSSIONS ON FEMA STATUS REPORT ON
TEMP. RELOCATION~ AUTH. TO RELOCATEb AVERAGE MOVING & RENTAL
EXPENSES, BILLS ~OR CLEANING HOUSEH LDS~ REPRESENTATION BY
LAWYERS RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS RAISED ~T 7/~ MEETING APP-
ROVAL OF THE AMENDED lAG, & FUTURE PLANS & CASE INFOR~ATION.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
POLLUTION REPORT
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
AN~CONDA SMELTER SITE
10/01/87 MIL~D~~~I~tR~~~~~N~Egg~SA~~gE~NIT Page:::-
..._=:8~=======--==== -==- ------- -- - -
FILE: 202171~ - =NUMBER~=300ii0======..=DATE; 0e;0;;a6=========PAGES~-~---
~TITLE/SUBJECT: FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY SCORE-BOARD REPORT
~UTHOR NO.3" FOR TEMPORARY RELOCATION OF MILL CREEK RESIDENTS.
... : NOT I ND I CATED
ORGANIZATION: FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: MISCELLANEOUS
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 300111 D~TE: 08/20/86 E PAGES: 1
POLLUTION REPORT NO.8 WHICH INCLUDES DISCUSSIONS ON RE-
LOCATION, BREAK IN TO ONE HOME,. ROAD OIL SITUATION" SECURITY
AND FEMA BEING ON SITE; ALSO INFORMATION ABOUT FUTuRE
ACTIONS AND CASE PENDING IS INCLUDED.
NOT INDICATED
USEPA
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
POLLUTION REPORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~~
FILE: 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER. 300112 D~TE: 10/09/86 E PAGES: 1
POLLUTION REPORT NO.9 WHICH INCLUDES DISCUSSIONS ON: RE-
LOCATIONL FEMA/EPA INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT" WINTERIZATION OF
V~CATED ~ESIDENCES RENT CHECKS FOR SECOND THREE-MONTH PER=
IOD,. AND RESIDENTS'MEETINGS; ALSO INFORM~TION ABOUT FUTURE
PLANS AND CASE PENDING IS INCLUDED.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
POLLUTION REPORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~-~~
FILE: 2021712
.lITLE/SUBJECT:
I
AUTHOR s
ORGAN I ZAT I ON:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGAN I ZAT ION:
DOCUMENT TY PE :
NUMBERs 300113 D~TE. 11/2~/86 E P~ESI 1
POLLUTION REPORT NO. 10, WHICH INCLUDES DISCUSSIONS ON RE-
LOCATION~ COMPLETION OF THE DUST SUPPRESSION APPLICATION,
FEMA EXP~NDITURES AS WELL AS INFORMATION ON FUTURE PLANS AND
CASE PENDING ARE INCLUDED.
NOT INDICATED
USEP~
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
POLLUTION REPORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~-~=
FILE. 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT s
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEEs
ORGAN I ZAT I ON s
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 300114 D~TEs 0~/12/87 E PAGES: 1
POLLUTION REPORT NO. 11 WHICH INCLUDES DISCUSSIONS ON RE-
LOCATION ASSISTANCE,. FEMA EXPENDITURESL EPA/FEMA AMENDED
INTERAGENCY AGREEMENTS, AS WELL AS INFuRMATION ON FUTURE
PLANS,. FISCAL AND CASE PENDS IS INCLUDED.
NOT INDICATED
us&P~
"~NDICATED
. INDICATED
TION REPORT
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021712 NUMBER: 30011~ D~TEs 00/00/84 PAGES. 122
TITLE/SUBJECT: "1984 DUST ABATEMENT INFORMATION"~ INCLUDES SECTIONS ON PRO-
~~SE~B~~E~N~g~~EI~~NANbR~~~~IN~~AA~gT~~~~~!E~LECI+~~~f~~E.
AUTHOR: NOT INDICr-ITED
ORGANIZATION. NOT INDICATED
ADDRESSEEs NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~NACONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/87 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX Page:l:
._._.====..=.._==.=a=_~_..~_s._._-____s=m.__s.=a=...=.=======-===-===========
FILE: 20~1712 NUMBER I 300116 DATE I 02/07/86 PAGES: e
TITLE/SUBJECT I SUPERFUND ACCESS AGREEMENT, MILL CREEK SUR'IEY, AND VISUAL
OBSERVATIONS.
PROPERTY OF GORDON H. BR~NDEN~URGER
~UTHORI NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATIONI NOT INDICATED
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPEI REPORT/STUDY
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEs 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT I
AUTHORs
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZ~TIONI
DOCUMENT TYPEs
NUMBER: 300117 DATE: 02/07/86 P~GES: 7
SUPERFUND ACCESS AGREEMENT, MILL CREEK SURVEY, AND VISUAL
OBSERVAT IONS.
PROPERTY OF GERALD 8. PATTERSON
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEs 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZ~TION.
DOCUMENT TYPEI
NUMBER. 300118
SUPERFUND ACCESS AGREEMENT,
OBSERVAT IONS.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDIC~TED
REPORT/STUDY
DATE. 02/07/86 PAGES: 8
MILL CREFK SURVEY, AND VISUAL
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEs 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER. 300119 DATE. 02/07/86" PAGES: 9
SUPERFUND ACCESS AGREEMENT, MILL CREEX SURVEY, AND VISUAL
OBSERVAT IONS.
PROPERTY OF ALEX L~ TRAY, SR.
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDIC~TED
REPORT/STUDY
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEs 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR,
ORGANIZATION.
~DDRESSEE,
ORGANIZATIONI
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER. 300120 DATE. 02/07/86 PAGES, 8
SUPERFUND ~CCESS AGREEMENT, MILL CREEK SURVEY, ~ND VISUAL
OBSERVATIONS.
PROPERTY OF SYLVESTER ~ND HELEN HAUS.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDIC~TED
REPORT/STUDY
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 2021712 ~ NUMBER. 300121
TITLE/SUBJECTt';:SUPERFUND ACCESS ~GREEMENT,
,.--OBSERVAT IONS.
~UTHORJNOT INDICATED
ORGANIZ~TIONI NOT INDIC~TED
ADDRESSEE. NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZ~TION: NOT INDIC~TED
DOCUMENT TYPE. REPORT/STUDY
DATE I 02/06/86 PAGES. e
MI~L C~EEK SURVEY, AND VISU~L
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTAN~ OPERABLE UNIT
10~01/87 ~DMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX P~ge:1~~
==_8~==========.-=.___a=a2~==s======~~,===.====..=========~====s==============
~ILE: 2021712 NUMBER' 300122 DATE: 02/~7/86 PAGES: 8
TITLE/SUBJECT: SUPERFUND ACCESS AGREEMENT, MILL CREEK SURVEY, AND VISUAL
OBSERVAT IONS.
AUTHOR: PROPERTY OF WILLIAM H. ANDERSON.
ORG~NIZ~TION: NOT INDICATED
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: ~~~O~~~~~B~~D
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 22121712
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGAN I ZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 300123 DATE: 02/217/66 P~GES: 6
SUPERFUND ~CCESS AGREEMENT, MILL CREEK SURVEY, AND VISUAL
OBSERVATIONS.
PROPERTY OF ARLENE BE~USOLEIL.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
--~----------------------------------------------------------------------~-~~
FILE: 22121712
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 300124 DATE: 212/08/66 PAGES: 9
SUPERFUND ~CCESS AGREEMENT, MILL CREEK SURVEY, ~ND VISUAL
OBSERVATIONS.
PROPERTY OF HARRY H. PIESKE.
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------~~=
FILE: 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~ AUTHOR:
,ORGANI ZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANI ZATION:
DOCUMENT TY PE :
NUMBER: 30012~ DATE: 02/218/86 PAGES: a
SUPERFUND ACCESS AGREEMENT, MILL CREFK SURVEY, AND VISUAL
OBSERVATIONS.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------~~=
FILE: 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TY PE :
NUMBER: 300126
SUPERFUND ACCESS AGREEMENT,
OBSERVATIONS.
PROPERTY OF JAMES M. BACON.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
DATE: 02/06/66 PAGES I 6
MILL CREEK SURVEY, AND VISUAL
--------------- ,-------------------------------------------------------------
... .
FILE: 2021712~. NUMBER: 300127 DATE: 02/08/66 PAGES: 8
TITLE/SUBJECT: ~RFUND ~CCESS AGREEMENT, MILL CREEK SURVEY, AND VISUAL
OBSERVAT IONS.
pROPERTY OF LAWRENCE HAUS.
AUTHOR: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
/01/87 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX Page:15~
.=z==============z=========~a===.===============z=========-==================
LE: 20Z1712 NUMBER: 300128 DATE: 02/08/86 PAGES: 8
TLE/SUBJECT: SUPERFUND ACCESS AGREEMENT, MILL CREEK SURVEY, AND VISUAL
OBSERVAT IONS.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
AUTHOR:
JRGAN I ZAT I ON:
ADDRESSEE:
JRGANIZATION:
)CUMENT TY PE :
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CLE: 2021712
ITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION.
OCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 300129
SUPERFUND ACCESS AGREEMENT,
OBSERVATIONS.
PROPERTY OF lONE DUDACK.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
DATE: 02/08/86 PAGES: 8
MILL CREEK SURVEY, AND VISUAL
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
'ILE. 2021712
. I TLE/SUB.JECT :
AUTHOR:
OR~IZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
)OCUIENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 300130
SUPERFUND ACCESS AGREEMENT,
OBSERVATIONS.
PROPERTY OF EVELYN MURRAY.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
DATE. 02/08/86 PAGES: 8
MILL CREEK SURVEY, AND VISUAL
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
=ILEa 2021712
rITLE./SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER. 300131 DATE. 02/08/86 PAGES: 8
SUPERFUND ACCESS AGREEMENT,. MILL CREEK SURVEY, AND VISUAL
OBSERVATIONS.
PROPERTY OF JOSEPH K. SMITH.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEI 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT.
~UTHOR .
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEEs
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 300132 DATE. 02/08/86 PAGES: 8
SUPERFUND ACCESS AGREEMENT, MILL CREEK SURVEY, AND VISUAL
OBSERV~TIONS.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 2021712
TITLE/SUB.JECTI
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE.
ORG~NIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
- NUMBER. 300132~ DATE. 00/00/00 PAGES. 6
VISUAL OBSERV~TIONS REPORT FOR THE MILL CREEK RESIDENCE OF
HAROLD AND MERNICE WOLFE. INCLUDES M~PS OF LOCATIONS OF
MILL CREEK YARDS AND RESULTS OF MISCELLANEOUS AND YARD
S~MPLING FOR ARSENIC IN SOIL.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
10/01/87 ~ILL CREEK'r MONT~N~ OPER~aLE'UNIT
-=--=-========--=----==- ~DMI~!S R~TIVE_R~CORD_!NDEX P~ge:l~~
FILE. 202 7 2 -=-=--=--=====--=-=-====--=============================
. 1 1 NUMBER: 300133 D~TE: 02/0~/86 PAGES" 1~
TITLE/SUBJECT: SUPERFUND ACCESS AGREEMENT MILL CREEK SURVEY AND VISUAL" ~.
08SERVATIONS. ' \,
PROPERTY OF MERNICE WOLFE.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORGANIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
------------------------------------------------------------------------~-----
FILE: 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORGANIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 300134
SUPERFUND ACCESS AGREEMENT,
OBSERV~TIONS.
PROPERTY OF DON DOUCET.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDIC~TED
REPORT/STUDY
DATE: 02/0~/86 PAGES: e
MILL CREEK SURVEY, AND VISUAL
------~---------------------------------------------------------------~-~~~~~~
FILE: 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NU~BER: 30013~ DATE: 02/09~86 PAGES~ e
SUPERFUND ACCESS ~GREEMENT, MILL CREEK SURVEY, AND VISUAL
OBSERVATIONS.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
-----------------------~-------------------------------------------------~~=~~
- .
FILEI 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 300136
SUPERFUND ACCESS AGREEMENT,
OBSERVATIONS.
PROPERTY OF BRUCE AND KATHY
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
DATE: 02/09/86 PAGES: e
MILL CREEK SURVEY, AND VISUAL
HAUS.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~~~
FILE: 202171Z NUMBER. 300137 DATE: 02/09/66 PAGES: 8
TITLE/SUBJECT: SUPERFUND ACCESS ~GREEMENT, MILL CREEK SURVEY, AND VISUAL
OBSERVATIONS.
PROPERTY OF MARTY J. BILLQUIST.
AUTHOR: NOT INDICATED .
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
~DDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZ~TIONI NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: REPORT/STUDY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~-~~
FILE. 2021712 '. NUMBER: 300138 DATE: 02/09/66 PAGES: 8
TITLE/SUBJECT: suPERFUND ~CCESS AGREEMENT, MILL CREEK SURVEY, AND V.ISUAL
OBIII!RVATIONS.
PROPERTY OF OLOF A. AND AVALON F. BILLQUIST.
~UTHOR: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATIONI NOT INDICATED
ADDRESSEE I NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: REPORT/STU~~___------------------------------------------------
-------------------------
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONT~N~ OPER~BLE UNIT
10/01/87 ~DMINIStR~TIVE RECORD INDEX Page:15-
.z.=s============a=.8=~_.==.._a_....___._a.=-==a=~====---=====================
FILE: 2021712 NUMBER: 300139 D~TE: 0a/09/86 P~GES: 8
TITLE/SUBJECT: SUPERFUND ACCESS AGREEMENT, MILL CREEK SURVEY, AND VISUAL
OBSERVAT10NS. .
PROPERTY OF HOWARD HAMEL.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORGAN IZAT I ON:
ADDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 300140
SUPERFUND ACCESS AGREEMENT,
OBSERVATIONS.
PROPERTY OF MRS. WHITEHEAD.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
D~TE: 03/20/86 PAGES: 9
MILL CREEK SURVEY, AND VISUAL
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR:
ORG~NIZATION.
ADDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER. 300141
SUPERFUND ACCESS AGREEMENT,
OBSERVATIONS.
PROPERTY OF ALZIE LIVELY.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDI'CATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
D~TE: 03/20/86 PAGES: 7
MILL CREEK SURVEY, ~ND VISUAL
------------------------------------------------~-----------------------------
FILE. 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT.
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZATIONi
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TY PE'.
NUMBER: 300142
TRANSMITTAL OF ~ SUPERFUND
CLARENCE DAHL~ JR.
MCKEON MICHA~L J.
MICHAEL J. MCKEON, P.C.
NICHOLS~ FLOYD D.
USEPA-VLII
LETTER
DATE: 04/08/86 PAGES: 1
~CCES$ ~GREEMENT SIGNED BY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHORs
ORGANIZ~TION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPEs
- NUMBER. 300143 D~TE. 04/08/86 PAGES: 9
SUPERFUND ACCESS AGREEMENT, "'ILL CREEK SURVEY, ~ND VISUAL
OBSERVAT IONS.
PROPERTY OF CL~RENCE DAHL, JR.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEI 2021712 NUMBER: 300144 DATE. 00/00/00 PAGES: 8
TITLE/SU8.JECTI~PERFUND ACCESS AGREEMENT, MILL CREEK SURVEY, AND VISUAL
,GBSERVAT IONS.
~UTHORI-.oT INDICATED
ORGANIZATIONI NOT INDICATED
ADDRESSEEs NOT INDIC~TED
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
10/01/67 MILL CREEK'r MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
s======--------- ADMINIS RATIVE RECORD INDEX Page:l:~
FILE. ~0;---~---===========~==================ss~~ss=======~==================
~TITLE. ~ ~171~ NUMBER: 300145 DATE: 00/00/00 PAGES' 8
~ /SUBJECT: SUPERFUND ACCESS AGREEMENT MILL CREEK SURVEY AND VISUAL'
- OBSERVATIONS ' ,
AUTHOR: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZAT10N: NOT INDICATED
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: REPORT/STUDY
-------------------------------------------~--------------------------------~-
FILE: 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 300146 DATE: 00/00/00
MILL CREEK SURVEY, AND VISUAL OBSERVATIONS.
PROPERTY OF AVALON BILLQUIST.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
PAGES: g
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~~=~
FILE: 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGAN! ZAT ION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TY PE :
NUMBER: 300147 DATE: 08/26/86 PAGES-: 2
OUTLINING THE PROPOSED ARRANGEMENT FOR ACCOMODATING THE
DESIRE EXPRESSED BY SOME OF THE MILL CREEK~ MONTANA CLIENTS
TO MINIMIZE THE PUeLIC AIRING OF INFORMATIuN LINKING
SPECIFIC HOMEOWNERS AND ADDRESSES TO SPECIFIC LEVELS OF
HAZARDOUS SUeSTANCES DETECTED ON THEIR PROPERTY.
CALLAWAY REX
USEPA-VI\I,. OFFICE OF REGIONAL COUNSEL
DAYTON, RAY J.
KNIGHT, DAHOOD, McLEAN & EVERETT
LETTER
------------------~------------------------------------------------------~~~~~
FILE: 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHO R :
~ORGANIZATION~
, ADDRESSEE:
~ ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
PAGES: 1
NUMBER: 300148 DATE: 00/00/00
CONSENT FOR RELeASE OF INFORMATION FORM (BLANK).
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
------------~------------------------------------------------------------_._~~~
FILE: 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TY PE :
NUMBER: 300148A DATE: 08/26/66 PAGES: 1
CONFIRMING THAT ALL RI/FS REPORTS AND SUBSEQUENT REPORTS
WILL BE WRITTEN IN SUCH A WAY THAT THE REPORT DOES NOT
SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFY SAMPLING LOCATIONS BY NAME AND
ADDRESS OF HOUSEHOLDS.
DOLE STEPHEN E.
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC>
CALLAWAY REX
USEPA-VI~I, OFFICE OF REGIONAL COUNSEL
LETTER
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~~
FILE: 2021712 NUMBER I 300148B DATE: 09/09/66 PAGES: 1
TITLE/SUBJECT. CONSENT FOR RELEASE OF INFORMATION SIGNED BY RAY J. DAYTON,
AND NOTARIZED BY EDWARD G. BEAUDETTE.
AUTHOR: DAYTON RAY J.
ORGANIZATION: KMtGHTb' DAHOOD, McLEAN & EVERETT
ADDRESSEE I NOT IN ICATED
ORGANIZATIONI NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE I REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONT~N~ OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/67 ~DMINISTR~TIVE RECORD INDEX Page:15=
=====================.=~=a__.-_==a.===_=8a.===================================
FILE: 2021712 NUMBER, 300148C D~TE: 00/00/00 PAGES: 1
TITLE/SUBJECT: A LIST OF THE MILL CREEK RESIDENTS REPRESENTED BY RAY J.
DAYTON.
AUTHOR: NOT INDICATED
ORG~NIZATION: NOT INDICATED
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: MISCELLANEOUS
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR.
ORG~NIZATION.
~DDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 300146D
CONSENT FOR RELEASE OF
AND NOTARIZED BY NANCY
D~YTON R~Y J.
KNIGHTb' D~HOOD, McLEAN
NOT IN ICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
D~TE. 10/06/66 P~GES. 1
INFORMATION SIGNED BY R~Y J. DAYTON,
L. DAHOOD.
& EVERETT
---------~--------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT.
~UTHORt
ORGANIZATION.
~DDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBERt 300149 DATE. 03/07/86 PAGES. J"
NOTIFICATION OF T~T MEMBERS PERFORMING QUANTITIVE AN~LYSIS
ON SOIL S~MPLES COLLECTED IN THE TOWN OF MILL CREEK UTILI-
ZING ~N X-MET 840 X-RAY FLUORESENCE ~N~LYZER IN ~ LABORAT-
ORY ~T MONTANA COLLEGE OF MINER~L SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY.
STEVENSON" PETER
USEPA-VII.1
NICHOLS FLOYD D.
ROY F. WESTON, INC./SPER
MEMO
--.---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT.
~UTHORt
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 3001~0 DATE.
S~MPLE PREPAR~TION AND DESCRIPTION
FROM THE MILL CREEK SITE.
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
"'EMO
02/21/66 E PAGES. 9
FOR 17~ SAMPLES TAKEN
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 2021712 NUMBER. 3001~1 DATE. 09/19/86 PAGES. a
TITLE/SUBJECT. OUTLINE OF T~T ~CTIONS PERTAINING TO THE "'ILL CREEK, ,.,T SITE
FROM 01/86 TO 09/86. ~FTER SOIL SAMPLES WERE T~KEN ~ND
~NALYZED BY THE X-MET, T~T DR~FTED AN ACTION ,.,EMO TO FURTHER
ASSIST IN THE REMOV~L OF FAMILIES WITH CHILDREN 6 AND UNDER.
AUTHOR: AL"'~UIST GERALD L.
ORGANIZATION. ROY F. WESTONb INC./SPER
ORG~~?~~~fg~: G~~~~~v~I1H~R
DOCUMENT TYPE. ,.,EMO
-----------------------~------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
ORG~NIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 3001~2 DATE. 0~/00/86 PAGES. 4
TRANSMITTAL OF A SUMM~RY OF SAMPLING ACTIVITIES CONDUCTED AT
~LL CREEK. E~CH OF THE THREE SAMPLING EVENTS THE FOLLOWING
INFORM~TION IS PROVIDED. 1) DATES 2) HINDRANCES 3) EQUIP-
MENT AND DECONTAMINATION PROCEDURES, 4) DESCRIPTION OF LOC-
~TION~ AND ~) SAMPLE DEPTHS.
WHITT~NHAGEN DIANE K.
ROY F. WESTONb INC./SPER
NICHOLS\ FLOY D.
USEPA-V.1II
MEMO
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
10/01/87 ~ILL CREEKr MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
1E===s8===============-----~~:~~!~=~~!IVE RECORD INDEX Page:1E~
TI~Et/~~~j~~~: SAMPLI~~M~~~~o5~0T~~~~;~::=:=g~}iI~i~~00;00=========PAGES~=8=:=
AUTHOR: NOT INDICATED .
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: LOGIDAILY REPORT
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEI 202171Z
TITLE/SUBJECT I
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATIONI
DOCUMENT TY PE :
NUMBER: 3001~4 DATE I 02/17/86 E PAGES: ~8
HANDWRITTEN NOTES ON SAMPLING LOCATIONS, DATA, AND ANALYSES
PERFORMED BETWEEN 2/17 AND 2/1~/86.
SAMPLES.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
HANDWRITTEN NOTES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~~
FILEI 2021712
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE I
ORGAN I ZATION I
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 3001~~ DATE I 02/17/86 E PAGES: ~1
LISTING OF RESIDENTS IN ~ILL CREEK IN RELATION TO SAMPLES
TAKEN~ ATTACHED IS SKETCH OF RESIDENCES TO HELP EXPLAIN
SA""PL~ LOCATIONS. ALSO INCLUDED IS SEVERAL EXAMPLES OF
LETTERS DESCRIBING SAMPLING ANALYSES TO THE RESIDENTS
INVOLVED.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
HANDWRITTEN NOTES
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------~
-FILEI Z021712
III TLE/SUBJECT I
AUTHOR:
ORGAN I ZAT I ON I
ADDRESSEEs
ORGANIZATIONI
DOCUMENT TY PE I
NUMBER: 3001~~B
RESULTS AND LOCATIONS
LIVELY. SAMPLES 18~ -
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
~ISCELL.ANEOUS
DATE I 03/20/86E PAGES: 3
OF SAMPLING ON PROPERTY OF ALZIE
168.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~~~
FILE r 2021 71 2
TITLE/ SUBJECT I
AUTHOR I
ORGANIZATIONI
ADDRESSEEz
ORGAN I ZAT ION I
DOCUMENT TYPE I
NUMBER I 3001~~C
LOCATIONS AND RESULTS OF
WHITEHEAD. SAMPLES la~ -
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MISCELLANEOUS
DATE I 03/20/66E PAGES: a
SAMPLING ON PROPERTY OF WILLIAM
1 ~4.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------~
FILEI 2021712 NUMBER I 3001~~D DATE I 03/20/86E PAGES I 2
TITLE/SUBJECT I SAMPLING LOCATIONS AND RESULTS. PROPERTY OF CLARENCE DAHL
AND BEVERLY FABOR. SAMPLES 176 - 164.
AUTHOR. NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION. NOT INDICATED
ADDRESSEEs NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION' NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPEI MISCELLANEOUS
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONT~N~ OPER~BLE UNIT
10/01/87 ~DMINISTR~TIVE RECORD INDEX Page:1E
._.-=.=====a2=====a~~========a_======-==.=.=====8.===========================:
FILE. 2021712 NUMBER. 3001S5F D~TE. 00/00/00 P~GES: 5
TITLE/SUBJECT I COVER LETTER FOR MILL CREEK RESIDENTS FOR TRANSMITTAL OF
SAMPLING LOCATIONS AND RESULTS.
~UTHORI NICHOLS FLOYD D.
ORG~NIZ~TIONI NOT INDicATED
~DDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
ORG~NIZATION: CITIZEN(S) OF MILL CREEK, MONTAN~
DOCUMENT TYPE: LETTER
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
FILE. 2021712
TITLE/SUB.1ECTI
AUTHORs
ORGANIZATIONs
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 3001~SG DATE: 02/17/86E PAGES: 1
SAMPLING LOCATIONS AND RESULTS FROM PATTERSON PROPERTY.
SAMPLES 1 - ~B.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDIC~TED
MISCELLANEOUS
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 2021712
TITLE/SU8.1ECTI
~UTHORs
ORGANIZ~TIONI
ADDRESSEE I
ORG~NIZ~TIONI
DOCUMENT TYPE I
NUMBER: 3001~~H DATE I 01/17/86
SAMPLING LOC~TIONS AND RESULTS FROM JUDD PROPERTY.
S~MPLES 10 - 12.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
LETTER
PAGES: 1
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
FILE. 2021712
TtTLE/SUB.1ECTI
AUTHORr
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE I
ORGANIZ~TIONI
DOCUMENT TYPE I
NUMBER I 3001~6 DATEs 04/18/86
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD FOR SAMPLING CONDUCTED
CREEK SITE BETWEEEN 2/17 AND 2/19/86.
NOT INDICATED .
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
PAGES: 1
AT THE MILL..
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEr 2021712
TITLE/SUB.1ECTI
AUTMORI
ORGAN IZAT I ON.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATIONI
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER I 3001~7
TWO COPIES OF CHAIN OF
~T THE MILL CREEK SITE
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MISCELLANEOUS
DATE I 02/2~/86 PAGES. 2
CUSTODY RECORD FOR SAMPLING CONDUCTED
BETWEEN 2/17 AND 2/19/86.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEI 2021712 NUMBERs 3001~8
TITLE/SUB.1ECT. D~ILY LOG OF S~MPLES
THE MILL CREEK SITE.
AUTHORs NOT INDICATED
ORG~NIZATIONtdfllQT INDICATED
~DDRESSEEt NOT INDIC~TED
ORG~NIZ~TION. NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPEs LOG/D~ILY REPORT
DATE I 0~/16/86 PAGES: 10
RUN BETWEEN ~/1~-~/12/86 ON X-MET FOR
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEI 2021712
TITLE/SU8.1ECTI
AUTHORr
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER I 3001~9 DATE I 04/23/86 PAGESr 123
ENDANGERMENT ASSESSMENT: MILL CREEK~ MONTAN~ ANACONDA
SMELTER SITE, DOCUMENT CONTROL NO. ~~8-WP1-EP-CKHY-1
CONTRACT NO. 68-01-6939, WORK ASSIGNMENT NO. 131-SL1S.1.
NOT INDICATED
CLEMENT & ASSOCIATES, INC.
NOT INDICATED
USEPA-VIIIL MONTANA OFFICE
MISCELLANEuUS
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
-------
~N~CONDA SMELTER SITE
~0/01/87 MILL CREEKt MONT~N~ OPER~BLE UNIT
===================8~__=_~DM!~IS RATIVE RECORD INDEX Page::~-
ILE' a0'~1714 . - - ==--=========888==_===============================-
. ~ NUMBER: 100001 D~TEI 06/23/87 . P~GES' 4~
TITLE/SUBJECT: TR~NSMITT~L OF A REPORT REG~RDING AN~LYSIS OF RELOCATION' ~
PROJECTS FOR EPA: ISSUES AND PROBLEMS RELATED TO MILL
~UTHOR: ~~I~~ONMO~~~~~.~:DOCUMENT CONTROL NO. 228-TS1-EP-EJMP)
ORG~NIZ~TION: C~MP DRESSER & McKEE INC
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONT~N~ OPER~BLE UNIT
~~~~~~~~==================~2:!~!;!~~~r~;=~;;~~2=!~2;~=================~~~;~l;;~
FILE: 77777777 NuMBER: 100002 D~TE: 06/14/65 PAGES: 25
TITLE/SUBJECT: CFEMAJ REGARDING I~PLEMENTATION OF EPA/FEMA MEMORANDUM OF
UNDERSTANDING (MOU> ON CERCLA RELOCATIONS. ATTACHED IS THE
SIGNED MOU BETWEEN FEMA & EPA DATED 3/29/65 ATTACHMENTS A
& e ON TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT RELOCATION~ AND INSTRUCTIONS
FOR FILLING OUT AN INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT/HMENDMENT.
MCGRAW JACK W.
USEPA ~EADQUARTERS
REGIONAL ADMINISTRATORS
USEPA, REGIONS I-X
MEMO
AUTHOR:
ORG~NIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 77777777 NUMBER: 100003 DATE. 08/08/8~E PAGES: 1a
TITLE/SUBJECT. REGARDING POLICY ON FLOODPLAINS AND WETLAND ASSESSMENTS FOR
CERCLA ACTIONS. ATTACHED IS A MEMORANDUM DATED 11/14/63
REGARDING FLOODPLAIN REQUIREMENTS TO WILLIAM N. HEDEMAN, JR.
OFFICE OF EMERGENCY AND REMEDIAL RESPONSE, FROM DOUGLAS A.
COHEN~ POLICY ANALYSIS BRANCH.
HEDEMHN WILLIAM N. JR.
USEPA,. OFFICE OF EMERGENCY AND REMEDI~L RESPONSE
NOT INDICATED
USEPA, REGIONS I-X
MEMO
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE.
---------~--------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 77777777
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 100004
REGARDING RCRA PERMITS
AMONG RCRA~ CERCLA AND
THOMAS LE~
USEPA HEADaU~RTERS
SERAYDARIAN~ HARRY
USEPA, REGIuN IX
MEMO .
DATE. 11/1~/83 PAGES: a
FOR SUPERFUND SITES, AND COORDINAT10N
OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL STATUTES.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 77777777
TITLE/SUBJECT.
~UTHOR:
ORG~NIZATION.
ADDRESSEE:
ORGAN I ZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER. 10000~ DATE. 10/01/86 PAGES: 20
"36 CFR PART 600: PROTECTION OF HISTORIC PORPERTIES"
REGULATIONS OF THE ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION
GOVERNING THE SECTION 106 REVIEW PROCESS.
NOT INDIC~TED
ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEr 77777777 NUMBER: 100006 DATE. 08/20/84 PAGES: 118
TITLE/SUBJECT: TRANSMITTAL OF SUPERFUND REMOVAL PROCEDURES-REVISION
NUMBER TWO WHICH SUPERCEDES THE SUPERFUND REMOVAL GUIDANCE
REVISION NUMBER ONE.
ORGANI~~~: ~i~~~~NbF~IE~I~~ ~MER~~NCY AND REMEDI~L RESPONSE
ADDRESSEE. NOT INDIC~TED
ORGANIZATICN.~ INDIC~TED
DOCUMENT TYPE. ~1IEMO
------------ ~.~ ~ -----------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 77777777
TITLE/SUB.1ECT.
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100007 DATE: 09/08/64 PAGES: 36
CAOJ "GUIDANCE MEMORANDUM ON USE ~ND ISSUANCE OF
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS UNDER SECTION 106(A) OF CERCLA."
TMOMAS LEE
USEPA,.'OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
REGIONAL ADMINISTRATORS
USEPA, REGIONS I-X
MEMO
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
10/01/87 MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
.¥=.=============---===- ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD 'INDEX Page: ~
FILE. 77777777 --- -========================---====..===================0
TITLE/SUBJECT NUMBER: 100008 DATE: OS/29/87 PAGES' 2
. CARJ REGARDING ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS FOR DECISIONS OF .
~~~OCvL~ RESPONSE ACTIONS. INCLUDES A LIST OF DOCUMENTS FOR
INCLUD~L ACTIONS AND REMEDIAL ACTIONS ~HICH SHOULD BE
LUCEROEDGJ~ET~~ ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD.
USEPA HEAD~UARTERS
DIRECTORS
USEPA, REGIONS I-X
MEMO
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------~--
FILE. 77777777
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 100009 DATE. 04/18/86 PAGES' 7
CARAJ TRANSMITTAL OF THE MILLCREEK MEMORANDUM DATED 3/24ies
REGARDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR GROUND WATER REMEDIATION AT
THE MILLCREEK, PA SITE FROM J. WINSTON PORTER~ ASSISTANT
ADMINISTRATOR, TO JAMES SElF, REGIONAL ADMINI~TRATOR
REG I ON I II.' ,
MLAY MARIAN
USEP~ HEADQUARTERS
DIRECTORS
USEPA, REGIONS I-X
MEMO
-----------------------------------------------------------------------~-~~~~~
FILE. 77777777
n TLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
~ ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION.
OCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 100010 DATE. 04/02/a~ PAGES: 12
CATSDRJ "MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE AGENCY FOR
TOXIC SUBSTANCES AND DISEASE REGISTRY AND THE UNIiED STATES
ENVI.RONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY." SIGNED BY AUTHOR AND AN
INDIVIDUAL ON ,BEHALF OF THE AGENCY FOR
TOXIC SU~STANCES AND DISEASE REGISTRY.
MCGRAW JACK W.
USEPA HEADQUARTERS
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MEMO
------------------------------------------------------------------------~--~~~
FILE. 77777777
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGAN I ZAT ION.
DOCUMENT TYPE I
NUMBER. 100011 DATE. 07/14/86 PAGES: 3
CATSDRJ REGARDING THE ROLE OF ATSDR IN EPA PROGRAMS.
THOMAS LEE
USEP~ HEADQUARTERS
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MEMO
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 77777777
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
ORGAN I ZAT I ON.
ADDRESSEE.
DORGAN I ZAT ION.
OCUMENT TV PE .
NUMBER. 100012 DATE. 0~/14/87 P~GES: 25
CATSDRJ TRANSMITTAL OF FIN~L GUIDANCE FOR THE COORDINATION
OF ATSDR HEALTH ASSESSMENT ACTIVITIES WITH THE SUPERFUND
REMEDIAL PROCESS. OSWER DIRECTIVE 928~.4-02.
-------
~N~CONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONT~NA OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/87 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX P~ge:l~~
._~._sa=~--~2._=a_~-a=~~...___a__.a-.-~~=....===-.-._a======.====~=====~======
FILE: 77777777 NUMBER: 100014 DATE: 03/ZZ/8S' PAGES: 29
TITLE/SUBJECT: CCRJ REGARDING COMMUNITY RELATIONS ACTIVITIES AT SUPERFUND
ENFORCEMENT SITES -~ INTERIM GUIDANCE. GUIDANCE DOCUMENT
ATTACHED.
MCGRAW JACK W.
USEPA HEADQUARTERS
REGIONAL ADMINISTRATORS
USEPA, REGIONS I-X
MEMO
AUTHOR:
ORG~NIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~---
FILE. 77777777
TITLE/SUB.JECT.
AUTHOR.
ORG~NIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANI ZAT'ION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER. 10001~ D~TE: 08/28/8~ PAGES: 3
CCRJ REGARDING COMMUNITY RELATIONS ACTIVITIES AT SUPERFUND
ENFORCEMENT SITES~ USED TO CLARIFY POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
INCLUDED IN THE M~RCH 2Z, 198~ INTERIM FIN~L POLICY ON
COMMUNITY RELATIONS ACTIVITIES AT SUPERFUND ENFORCEMENT
SITES.
LUCE RO GENE A.
USEPA ~EADQUARTERS
DIRECTORS
USEPA, REGIONS I-X
"'EMO
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 77777777
TITLE/SUB.JECT.
~UTHOR .
ORG~NIZATION:
ADDRESSEE.
ORG~NIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 100016
tCRJ TRANSMITTAL OF EP~
ACTIVITIES.
PRICE COURTNEY M.
USEPA'HEADQUARTERS
REGION~L ADMINISTRATORS
USEPA, REGIONS I-X
MEMO
DATE: 11/21/8~ PAGES: 7
POLICY ON PUBLICIZING ENFORCEMENT
------------------------------------------------------------------------~-----
FILE: 77777777
TITL.E/SUB.JECT.
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION.
~DDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER: 100017 D~TE: 04/14/86 PAGES: 2
tCRJ NOTES ON A MEETING HELD APRIL 8, 1986 CONCERNING
SUPERFUND PUBLIC MEETINGS.
SANDERS\ DORIS E.
USEPA-V!II
DUPREY,. ROBERT L.
USEPQ-vIII
MEETING NOTES
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 77777777
TITLE/SU8.JECT.
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER. 100018
tEAJ REG~RDING H~ZARD
LEVELS
AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
IEMO
DATE. 12/01/84 PAGESs
CRITERIA USED TO EVALUATE CONTAMINANT
---------------~-----------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 77777777:i." NUMBER. 100019 DATE. 12/23/84 PAGES. 7
TITL.E/SU8.JECT. tEA] COMMENTS ON H~ZARD CRITERIA USED TO EVALUATE
CONTAMINANT ~EVELS. ATTACHED IS A 10/9/84 MEMORANDUM TO
SENE LUCERO CONCERNING H~ZARD CRITERIA AND A TRANSMITTAL OF
~ LETTER CONCERNING THE USE OF HAZARD CRITERIA AT NP~ SITES
TO GENE LUCERO FROM ROBERT L. DUPREY.
LUCERO GENE A.
USEPA HEADQUARTERS
DUPREY,. ROBERT L.
USEPA-vIII
MEMO
AUTHOR.
ORG~NIZATION.
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
"ILL CREEKTMONTAN~ OPERABLE UNIT
;~~~;~~~=aa===a========.a.~2~!~!;=~~~!~;=~;;~~~=!~~~~-=-----=--- P~ge: :~.
FILE: 77777777 NUMBER: 100020 DAT :-----~----- ---========~====
~TITLE/SUBJECT: tEAJ "SUPERFUND HEALTH ASSESSME~T ~~~aA[~5 PAGES.
AV~ILABLE UPON REQUEST
AUTHOR: NOT INDICATED
ORG~NIZATION: NOT INDIC~TED
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
ORG~NIZ~TION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 77777777
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100021 DATE: 08/00/85 PAGES: 2~.
tEAJ "ENDANGERMENT ASSESSMENT HANDBOOK" PREPARED FOR PRIME
CONTRACTOR, PRC ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT INC. UNDER
CONTRACT. 68-01-7037. INCLUDES MEMORANbuM OF TRANSMITTAL
FROM GENE ~. LUCERO, DATED 9/a0/8~ AND AN ERR~TA OUTLINING
CHANGES "'ADE.
NOT INDICATED
ICAIR,. LIFE SYSTEMS, INC.
NOT INDICATED
USEPA
REPORT/STUDY
-------------------------------------~----------------------------------~-~~~
FILE. 77777777
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 1000Z2 DATE. 08/00/8~ PAGESr 1~3
tEAJ "TOXICOLOGY HANDBOOK, PRINCIPLES RELATED TO HAZ~RDOUS
WASTE SITE INVESTIGATIONS" PREPARED FOR THE PRIME
CONTRACTOR, PRC ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, INC. UNDER
CONTRACT. 68-01-7037.
NOT INDIC~TED
ICAIR,. LIFE SYSTEMS, INC.
NOT INDIC~TED
USEPA
REPORT/STUDY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------~~
~ ILE: 77777777
'1 ITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZ~TION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZ~TION:
DOCUf'IIENT TYPE:
NUf'IIBER: 100023
tEAJ TRANSMITTAL OF
DOCUMENTS.
PORTER J. WINSTON
USEPA ~EADnUARTERS
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDIC~TED
MEMO
DATE: 11/22/8~ ~GES: 221
ENDANGERMENT ASSESSMENT GUIDANCE
---------------------------------------------------------------------------~=
FILE. 77777777
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZ~TION.
DOCUMENT TYPE:
---------------~
NUMBER: 100024 DATE I 06/06/86 PAGES: 2
tE~J "THE SUPERFUND PUBLIC HEALTH EVALUATION DATABASE FOR
PERSONAL COMPUTERS" WHICH IS INTENDED TO ACCOMPANY THE
SUPERFUND PUBLIC HEALTH EVALUATION MANUAL, DECEMBER 18, 1985
DRAFT.
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NO:r INDIC~TED
RIiPORT/STUDY
-----------------------------~---------------------------
~i~ct/~.3t6t~ tEAJ ~~~~~~ITt~~0a~ A REPORTDA!BAT~/~~~~~EFOR EVALUg~~5~s 14
OF POTENTIAL HUMAN EXPOSURE TO CHEMICALS AT UNCONTROLLED
HAZARDOUS WASTE SITES". ALSO ATTACHED IS A DRAFT OF
"GUIDELINES FOR PROVIDING LABORATORY DATA AND QUALITY
CONTROL INFORMATION IN REPORTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES"
AUTHOR: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZ~TION: AGENCY FOR TOXIC SUBSTANCES & DISEASE REGISTRY (ATSDR>
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZ~TION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE. MEMO
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
~ILL CREEK MONT~N~ OPER~BLE UNIT
10/01/87 ~DMINISTR~TIVE RECORD INDEX P~ge:1E-~
..-__.==8=======.==a4~_==8-=---_..==8=a========-===z======.==================~
FILE: 77777777 NUMBER: 100026 D~TE: 06/30/86 P~GES: l~
TITLE/SUBJECT: CEAJ REGARDING ESTABLISHMENT OF THE RISK ASSESSMENT COUNCIL.
ATTACHED IS THE RIS~ ASSESSMENT COUNCIL CHARTER INCLUDING
THEIR OBJECTIVES, ORGANIZATION AND PROCEDURES AND THE RISK
~SSESSMENT FORUM CHARTER.
THOMAS LEE
USEPA HEADQUARTERS
REGIONAL ADMINISTRATORS
USEPA, REGIONS I-X
MEMO
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 77777777
TITLE/SUBJECT.
~UTHOR I
ORG~NIZ~TlON:
~DDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZ~TION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 100027 D~TE: 09/24/86 PAGES: 49
tEA] FEDER~L REGISTER,. PART 111~ "GUIDELINES FOR MUTA-
GENICITY RISK ~SSESSMENT". ~TTA~HED ~RE PARTS IV-VI
GUIDELINES FOR THE HE~LTH RISK ~SSESSMENT OF CHEMICAL
MIXTURES~ FOR THE HEALTH ASSESSMENT OF SUSPECT DEVELOPMENTAL
TOXICANT~L AND FOR EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT.
NOT INDICRTED
USEPA HEADQUARTERS
NOT INDIC~TED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILEI 77777777
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER: 100028
CFEM~] REGARDING PROCEDURES
~GREEMENTS WITH FEMA.
RYANL D~V I D P.
USE PH
IRBYL GEORGE
USE PH
MEMO
DATE. 07/10/86 P~GES: 3
FOR FUNDING INTERAGENCY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 77777777
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
~DDRESSEE.
ORG~NIZATION.
DOCU~ENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100029 DATE: 06/00/8~ PAGES: 178
CFS] "GUID~NCE ON FEASIBILITY STUDIES UNDER CERCLA"
NOT INDICATED
USEPA HEADQU~RTERS
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 77777777
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR.
ORGANIZ~TION.
~DDRESSEE :
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER: 100030 DATE: 11/20/8~
CNCPJ FEDERAL REGISTER - PART II "NATIONAL OIL
HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES POLLUTION CONTINGENCY PLAN',
RULE" .
NOT INDIC~TED
USEP~ HEADQUARTERS
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED.
REPORT /STUDY ,
PAGES: 69
AND
FINAL
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 77777777 . NU~BER. 100031
TITLE/SU8.1ECT. [OSP) REGARDING PROCEDURES
OFF-SITE RESPONSE ~CTIONS.
ORGANI~~+~g~: ~;~S~WHE~~~~A~tERS
ADDRESSEE: REGIONAL ~DMINISTRATORS
ORGANIZATION: USEPA, REGIONS I-X
DOCUMENT TYPE: MEMO
DATE: 0~/06/8~ P~GES: 10
FOR PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTING
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
10/01/87 MILL CREEK MONTANA O~ERABLE UNIT
I~.=============_._=..====_ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX Page:1S:
/I'FILEo 77777777 -=...==:========--===--==============================
. TITLE/SUBJECT: [QAJ ~~~~EIORN: Vi 01 01 032 DATE: 09/02/82E PAGES: 341
MENTS I'S QUALITY ASSURANCE GUIDANCE REQU!RE-
GR~M-0~NDF~R~CEQURES MANUAL", DOCUMENT CONTROL * R8-QAO-82-
NOT IND~CATED 8~/83o
USEPA-VIII
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TY~E:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 77777777
TITL£/SU8.JECT.
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 100033 DATE: 0&/0&/8& ~AGES: 147
CQAJ "DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES FOR THE RI/FS PROCESS"
PRE~ARED FOR THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY AND REMEDIAL RESPONSE
OFFICE OF WASTE ~ROGRAMS ENFORCEMENT AND OFFICE OF SOLID'
WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE. DOCUM£NT I 93~~ 0-7A
LONGEST~ HENRY L.~ II °
USEPA H~AD~UARTER~
DIRECTORS
USEPA~ REGIONS I-X
REPOR J /STUDY
-----------------------~-------------------------------------------------~~~~~
FILEI 77777777
TITLE/SU8.1ECT.
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100034 DATE: 07/30/8& PAGES: 4
CQAJ REGARDING REVIEWS AND APPROVAL OF CERCLA SAMPLING AND
~APP PLANS. FOCUSES ON WAYS TO SPEED UP AND/OR IMPROVE
QUALITY OF QAPP AND SAMPLING PLAN REVIEWS.
LEHR1. JAMES B.
USEP~-VIII
GEISE, EiILL
USEPA-VIII
MEMO
----------------------------------------------------------------------------=~
IIrIILE. 77777777
, I TLE/SU8.1ECT .
~UTHOR:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 10003~ D~TE: 08/19/86 PAGES: 10
[R/CJ REGARDING CONSIDERATION OF RCRA REQUIREMENTS IN
PERFORMING CERCLA RESPONSES AT MINING WASTE SITES.
FEDERAL REGISTER,. "REGULATORY DETERMINATION FOR WASTES FROM
THE EXTRACTION AND BENEFICIATION ORES AND MINERALS," IS
~TTACHED.
LONGEST~ HENRY L.~ II
USEPA H~ADQUARTER~
DIRECTORS
USEPA, REGIONS I-X
MEMO
----------------------------------------------------------------------------~~
FILE. 77777777 NUMBER. 100036 D~TE: 03/00/84 PAGES: 93
TITLE/SUBJECT. CRAJ "SUMMARY REPORT: REMEDIAL RESPONSE AT HAZARDOUS WASTE
SITES"
~UTHOR. NOT INDIC~TED
ORGANIZ~TION: ENVIRONMENTAL L~W INSTITUTE
~DDRESSEE: NOT INDIC~TED
ORGANIZ~TION. USEP~
DOCUMENT TYPE. REPORT/STUDY
-----------------~---------------------------------------------------------~
FILE: 77777777 NUMBER: 100037 D~TE: 0&/00/8~ PAGES: 147
TITLE/SUBJECT. [RD/R~) "EPA GUIDE FOR MINIMIZING THE ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL
EFFECTS OF CLEANUP OF UNCONTROLLED HAZARDOUS-WASTE SITES"
PREPARED UNDER INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT I AD-89-F-2All~.
AUTHOR: NOT INDICATED
ORG~NIZ~TION: PACIFIC NORTHWEST LABORATORY
ADDRESSEE. NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION: USEPA
DOCUMENT TYPE: REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/67 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEXPage:l~
..=a.===.=====:===-~.=a_.=_.==a2==.=-=.=a_._=S2===-===========z==============:
FILE. 77777777 NUMBER. 100036 DATE. 10/00/65 PAGES: ~~~
TITLE/SUBJECT. CRD/RAJ "HANDBOOK - REMEDIAL ACTION AT WASTE DISPOSAL SITES
(REVISED)" PREPARED UNDER CONTRACT" 66-03-3113. INCLUDES
REMEDIAL ACTION DESCRIPTION APPLICATION DESIGN
CONSTRUCTIONb OPERATION, TECHNOLOGY EVALUATION, AND COSTS.
NOT INDICATE
SAIC
NOT INDICATED
USEPA
REPORT/STUDY
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------~
FILE. 77777777
TITLE/SUB.JECT.
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 100039 DATE. 06/00/66 PAGES: 105
CRD/RAJ "SUPERFUND REMEDIAL DESIGN AND REMEDIAL ACTION
GUIDANCE" REVISED EDITION FIRST ISSUE WAS DATED 2/65.
REPORT SU~MARIZES THE STEPS TAKEN-TO PREPARE FOR REMEDIAL
ACTION.
NOT INDICATED
USEPA, OFFICE OF EMERGENCY AND REMEDIAL RESPONSE
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE. 77777777
TITLE/SUBJECT.
- AUTHOR.
, ORGAN I ZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE.
NUMBER. 100040 DATE. 12/24/66 PAGES. 26
CREA/SARJ "INTERIM GUIDANCE ON SUPERFUND SELECTION
OF REMEDY,." PROVIDING GUIDANCE CONCERNING IMPLEMENTATION OF
SARA CLEANUP STANDARDS AND PROVISIONS. ATTACHED IS A TRANS-
MITTAL OF THE REPORT FROM JOHN F. WARDELL, EPA REG. VIII TO
DUANE ROeERTSON~ OF MDHES.
PORTER J. WINS ION
USEPA HEADQUARTERS
REGIONAL ADMINISTRATORS
USEPA~ REGIONS I-X
REPORI/STUDY
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
FILEI 77777777
TITLE/SUBJECT.
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION.
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER. 100041 DATE. 06/00/6~PAGES., 17;::
CRIJ "GUIDANCE ON REMEDIAL INVESTIGATIONS UNDER CERCLA"
PREPARED UNDER CONTRACT. 66-03-3113 TO BE USED IN CONDUCT-
ING INVESTIGATIONS SUPPORTING ENFORCEMENT AND LITIGATION
AS IT PROVIDES A DETAILED STRUCTURE FOR FIELD STUDIES.
NOT INDICATED
JRB ASSOCIATES
NOT INDICATED
USEPA
REPORT/STUDY
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
FILE: 77777777 NU~BERI 100042 DATE I 09/03/66E PAGES. 4
TITLE/SUBJECT I CROD/EDDJ "ROD DECISIONS PERTAINING TO ARSENICL CADMIUM,
AND LEAD SOIL CONTA~INATION" INCLUDES SITE NAMt:. DATE
PROBLEM~ ACTION AND ACTION LEVELS~ AND EPA REGION. ATtACHED
IS A LI~T OF SITES~ THE RESPECTIVt:. EPA REGIONAL AND HEAD-
QUARTERS CONTACTS MND THEIR PHONE NUM9ERS.
AUTHOR. -NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION. NOT INDICATED
ADDRESSEEI NOT INDICATED
ORG~NIZATIONI NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE. REPORT/STUDY
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------~
-------
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIT
10/01/87 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX Page:17~
=._.-===a===aa=a_~___a=_..=__.-~=_===a.a=_._..=.z=._==:a====--================
FILE: 77777777 NUMBER: 100043 DATE: 03/20/84 PAGES. 9
TITLE/SUBJECT: CRPS/NLJ REGARDING PARTICIPATION OF POTENTIALLY RESPONSIBLE
I PARTIES IN DEVELOPMENT QF REMEDIAL INVESTIGATIONS AND
FEASIBILITY STUDIES UNDER CERCLA.
AUTHOR: THOMAS, LEE .
ORGANIZATION: USEPA,. OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
ADDRESSEE: REGIONAL ADMINISTRATORS
ORGANIZATION: USEPA, REGIONS I-X
DOCUMENT TYPE: MEMO
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 77777777
TITLE/SUB.1ECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100044 DATE: 10/12/84
CRPS/NLJ REGARDING PROCEDURES FOR ISSUING NOTICE
A GENERIC SAMPLE STRUCTURE FOR A NOTICE LETTER IS
LUCERO GENE A.
USEPA HEAOQUARTERS
DIRECTORS
USEPA, REGIONS I-X
MEMO
PAGES: 26
LETTERS.
INCLUDED.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~-
FILE: 77777777
TITLE/SUB.1ECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 10004~ DATE: 03/27/8~
CRPS/NLJ REGARDING PRP PARTICIPATION IN RI/FS.
GUIDELINES TO THE SEQUENCE OF EVENTS BEFORE THE
b~~~~oHEgB~aA~tERS
DIRECTORS
USEPA, OFFICE OF EMERGENCY AND REMEDIAL RESPONSE
MEMO
PAGES: a
PROVIDES
RI/FS.
---------~--------------------------------------------------------------~-~~~
FILE: 77777777 NUMBER: 100046 DATE: 02/19/87 PAGES: 14
TITLE/SUBJECT: CSARAJ TRANSMITTAL OF THE RECENTLY SIGNED EXECUTIVE ORDER
ON SUPERFUND IMPLEMENTATION.
AUTHOR: DUPREY ROBERT L.
ORGANIZ~TION: USEPA-~I~I
ADDRESSEE: PICKERELL LORETTA
~~~~~~!:!~~~l_~~!!~~~::~::~::_~:_:~:~~:_------------------------------------~
FILE: 77777777 NUMBER. 100047 DATE: 12/00/81
TITLE/SUBJECT: CTG-GJ "SUPERFUND GUIDANCE MANUAL"
. AUTHOR: NOT INDIC~TED
ORGANIZ~TION: NOT INDICATED
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
Dg~fl~~~~A+~g~: W~~g~T/STUDY -----------------------------------------------
-------------------------------
PAGES: 3'35
FILE 77777777 NUMBER: 100048 OATE: 00/00/84E PAGES. 12
: CTG-GJ PETREX COMPANY ENVIRONMENTAL SURVEYS: INFORMATION
TITLE/SUBJECT: ON GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION AND ANALYSIS METHODS.
INCLUDES COST ESTIMATES FOR SAMPLES.
AUTHOR I N« I ND I CATED
ORGANIZATION: ~INDX IC~TED
ADDRESSEE: .--. ,..
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: REPORT/STUDY -----------------------------------------------
-------------------------------
NUMBER: 100049 OATE: 04/00/8~ PAGES: 248
~IIfELE:/S7U7~J~tt7 CTG-GJ "CHARACTERIZATION OF HAZARDOUS WASTE SITES - A
: METHODS MANUAL~ VOLUME I - SITE INVESTIGATIONS"
AUTHOR: FORD PATRICK~.
ORGANIZATION: GCA CORPORATION
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
Dg~~~~~~A+~~~: ~~~b~T/STUDY -----------------------------------------------
-------------------------------
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SIiE
MILL CREEK MONTAN~ OPER~BLE UNIT
10/01/67 ~DMINISTR~TIVE RECORD INDEX P~ge:171
=~====.==~==========a==Ds=_..a.a~...=.====.=.=================================
FILE: 77777777 NUMBER: 100050 D~TE: 00/00/00 P~GES:
TITLE/SUBJECT: [Q~J REGION 6 QA GUIDANCE ON LEVEL A/B.
AVAILABLE ~PON REQUEST
AUTHOR: NOT INDICATED
ORG~NIZATION: NOT INDICATED
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
ORG~NIZATION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: MEMO
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 77777777
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZ~TIONI
~DDRESSEE:
ORGANIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100051 DATE: 04/22/86E
[TG-GJ "A COMPARISON OF TRACE METAL DETERMIN~TIONS
CONTAMINATED SOILS BY 'XRF AND ICAP SI=IECTROSCOPIES"
KENDALL\ DOUGLAS S.
USEPA-V1II
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDIC~TED
REPORT/STUDY
PAGES: 1 1
IN
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 77777777
T I TL.E/SUBJECT :
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORGANIZ~TION:
DOCU,..ENT TY PE : '
NUMBER: 100052 DATE: 09/10/00E PAGES: 4
[J REG~RDING INTERN~TIONAL P~PER ACL DEMONSTRATION
CONSISTING OF SETTING ACCEPT~BLE RISK LEVELS FOR CARCINO-
GENIC CONSTITUENTS IN ESTABLISHING ALTERNATE CONCENTRATION
LIMITS <~CL).
THOMAS LEE
USEPA RE~DQUARTERS
K~Y MORRIS
USEPA, REGION VII
MEMO
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 77777777
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NU,..BER: 100053 DATE: 10/00/86
[J "SUPERFUND PUEILIC HEALTH EVALUATION MANU~L"
NOT INDIC~TED
USEPA,. OFFICE OF EMERGENCY AND REMEDIAL RESPONSE
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
REPORT/STUDY
P~GESI 165
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 17717771
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
~DDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100054 DATE: 12/13/84 PAGES: 14
INSTRUCTION 86Z0.4: PERMANENT RE~OCATION PROJECTS UNDER.
SUPERFUND. THE INSTRUCTION DEFINES THE FEDER~L EMERGENCY
M~NAGEMENT AGENCY
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
10/0~/S7 MILL CREEKr MONT~N~ OPER~BLE UNIT
=_.==-=-====.=====-=======~2~~~;;.~~;~~;=~;;2:2=!~~~~-------- Page:172
~I~ck/~~~J~~~: "EPIDE~~a~E~ic1~~~E~ATION OF ~~~E~~~~~~~~8~~~:=::=::~~~~~~=8===
WORKERS OF NON-FERROUS METALWORKS. PART I' CORONARY RISK
F~CTORS; PART II: CORONARY HEART DISEASE,,'VOL 77'469-4i~
~ND 51217-51121. . oJ . ....
ORG~NI~Z~TTHIOONR:. TRUSZ-GLUZ~,. MARIA., ET AL
~ ~ PRZEGLAD LEKARSKI
~DDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
ORG~NIZ~TION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 20Z170Z NUMBER: 10121aS8 DATE: 00/00/75 P~GES: 2
TITLE/SUBJECT: "THE EFFECTS OF DIET~RY COPPER, IRON AND ZINC ON THE
TOXICITY OF LEAD IN M~LE RATS" VOL. ~6(8) '3876-8
AUTHOR: KLAUDER D~VID S. . .
ORG~NIZ~TION: DISSERTATION ABSTRACTS INTERN~TIONAL
~DDRESSEE: NOT INDIC~TED
ORG~NIZATION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: NEWSP~PER/JOURN~L ~RTICLE
-----Q-----------------------------------------------------------------_..._~<=:>-- - - ,-
FILE: 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
. ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 1002S9 D~TE: 0~/00/82 P~GES: 11
"~ HISTORICAL PROSPECTIVE MORTALITY STUDY OF WORKERS IN
COPPER AND ZINC REFINERIES" VOL. 24(~>:398-408.
LOGUE JAMES N. ET AL
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSP~PER/JOURNAL ~RTICLE
---------~-------------~~~~-------------------~-------~---------------~--~~~--
FILE: 202170'::
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORG~NIZATION:
ADDRESSEE a
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100a~0 D~TE: 00/00/76 P~ES: ~
"EFFECT OF DIETARY ZINC AND COPPER INTERRELATIONSHIPS ON
BLOOD PARAMETERS OF THE RAT" VOL. 24(4):808-811.
MURTHYi L~LITHA., ET AL
J. AGR C. FOOD CHEM.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPE~/JOURNAL ARTICLE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~~--
FILE: 20Z1702 NUMBER: 10121291 DATE: 08/00/76 PAGES: g
TITLE/SUBJECT: "COPPER MET~80LISM AND THE EPIDEMIOLOGY OF CORONARY HEART
DISEASE" VOL. 14(;2> :221-;2aS.
~UTHOR: KLEVAY LESLIE M., ET AL
ORGANIZ~TION: NUTRITION REPORTS INTERNATIONAL
~DDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: NEWSPAPER/JOURN~L ARTICLE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE 2021702 NUMBER: 100292 DATE: 10/00/73 PAGES: 3
TITLt/SUBJECTI "HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMI~ IN RATS PRODUCED BY ~N INCREASE IN THE
R~TIO OF ZINC TO COPPER INGESTED" VOL. 26:1060-1068.
~UTHORI KLEVAY LESLIE M'1. ET AL
ORG~NIZATION~.tHE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
ADDRESSEE. NOT INDICATED
ORG~NI~A+~~: ~~s~~8~~~}aBRNAL ~RTICLE
DOCUMEN ------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONT~N~ OPERABLE UNIT
10/0a/87 ~DMINIStR~TIVE RECORD INDEX P~ge:173
a==-=S.,=8.2==.=a=========a=a=====.=....=....=~aa=====-==..====================
FILE: a0Z170Z NUMBER: 100293 D~TE: 00/00/77 PAGES: 5
TITL~/SUBJECT: "INFLUENCE OF DIETARY COPPER AND ZINC ON RAT LIPID
METABOLISM" VOL. 25<:5> :1105-110'3.
AUTHOR: PETERING HAROLD G., ET AL
ORGANIZATION: J. AGRIC: POOD CHEM.
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZ~TION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT:
~THOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100a'34 DATE: 09/00/81
COMMUNITY HEALTH ASSOCIATED WITH ARSENIC IN
IN MILLARD COUNTY~ UTAH" :
377-38~.
HARRINGTON MALCOLM. ET AL
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FIl.Et 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZ~TION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCU"'ENT TYJ:)E:
NUMBER: 100297 D~TE: 12/00/7~ PAGES: 4
"PROTECTIVE VALUE OF DIETARY COPPER AND IRON AGAINST SOME
TOXIC EFFECTS OF LEAD IN RATS" VOL. 12:77-80.
KLAUDER DAVID S. ET AL
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR.
ORGANIZATION.
ADDRESSEE.
ORGANIZATION:
DOCU"'ENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100298 DATE: 06/00/67 J:)AGES: 7
"THE EFFECT OF DIETARY MINERAL SUPJ:)LEMENTS OF THE RAT ON
THE
-------
~N~COND~ SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONT~N~ OPER~BLE UNIT
10/02/e7 ~DMINISTR~TIVE RECORD INDEX Page:174
s=...._~._====_==a=-_._.=2==a========-=======~===--=--=======-----------------
_LE: 2021702 NUMBER: 100Z99 D~TE:-0e700/71 ------PAGES~-9---
;T'LE/SUBJECT: "STUDIES OF ZINC METABOLISM IN THE RAT" VOL. 23:93-1iZll.
, ~UTHOR: PETERING, H~ROLD G., ET AL
RG~NIZATION: ~RCHIVES OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
~DDRESSEE: NOT INDIC~TED
ORG~NIZ~TION: NOT INDIC~TED
DOCUMENT TYPE: NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021702
TITL.E/SUBJECT:
~UTHOR:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZATION:
DOCU"'ENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100300 DATE: 00/00/74
"THE INFLUENCE OF DIETARY MANGANESE AND CHROMIUM
SERUM SERULOPLASMIN ACTIVITY, COPPER AND ZINC IN
VOL. 33<3 PART 1) :66e.
O'FLAHERTY, E.J., ET AL
FED. PROC.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL. ARTICLE
PAGES: 1
ON
MALE RATS"
-------------------------------------------------------------------------~--~=
FILE: 2021702
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZ~TION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORG~NIZ~TION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100301 DATE: 00/00/73 PAGES: 1
"EFFECTS OF CADMIUM ON GLUCOSE TOLERANCE AND SERUM
INSULIN ZINC AND COPPER IN MALE RATS" VOL. 32(3 PART 1) :468.
BOO~, R.Ja. ET AL
FED. PROI,,;.
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NEWSP~PER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
---------------------------------------------------------------------------~~=
FILE: 202170~ NUMBER: 100302 DATE: 00/00/73 PAGES: 17
TITLE/SUBJECT: "SKIN CANCER IN CHRONIC ARSENICISM" VOL. 4(4) : 469-4e5.
AUTHOR: YEH SHU (M.D.)
ORG~NIZATION: HUM~N PATHOLOGY
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
ORG~NIZATIONI NOT INDICATED
,~:~~~~!_!!~~!_~~~:~~~~~:~~~~~~~-~~!::~:_------------------------------~-----~r
FILE: 2021702 NUMBER: 100303 DATE: 00/00/7~ PAGES: 9
TITLE/SUBJECT: "A STUDY OF THE COMBINED TOXIC EFFECTS OF ORAL CADMIUM
". AND LEAD IN RATS" PAGES 39~-401 IN: D.O. HEMPHILL, EDITOR
"TRACE SUBSTANCES IN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH-IX"
COLUMBIA MO.
AUTHOR: MURTHY lALITHA., ET AL
ORGANIZATION: UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI
ADDRESSEE: NOT INDICATED
ORG~NIZATION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ARTICLE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE I 2021702 NUMBER: 100304 ~TEI 00/00/73 PAGES: 8
TITLE/SUBJECT: "THE IMPACT OF LOW LEVEL CADMIUM FEEDING ON BLOOD
Q£MICALS IN MALE, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY RATS. II PAGES 30~-311
1HI D. D. HEMPHILL, EDITOR '.TRACE SUBSTANCES IN
8HtRONMENTAL HEALTH-VII" COLUMBIA, MO.
AUTHORI-JfIJ:E1. D. P., ET AL
ORG~NI ZATION&;-.IUitIVt:.RSITY OF CINCINNATI
ADDRESSEE. NOT INDICATED
ORGANIZATION: NOT INDICATED
DOCUMENT TYPE: NEWSPAPER/JOURNAL ART::~:_-------------------------------------
------------------------------------
-------
ANACONDA SMELTER SITE
MILL CREEK MONTANA OPERABLE UNIr
1~/~2/87 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX Pag
===========================~=========================~:=~~~~=============== -
FILE: 2021705 NUMBER: 10~~~1 DATE: 09/26/87 PAGES: 1
TITLE/SUBJECT: TRANSMITTAL OF ~0 COPIES OF THE MILL CREEK REMEDIAL
. INVESTIGATION REPORT WITH CHANGES AS DIRECTED BY THE U.S.
EPA REGION VIII. A COpy OF A POINT-BY-POINT INVENTORY OF
RESPONSES IS ALSO ATTACHED.
GLASS, GREGORY
TETRA TECH,. INC.
DOLE STEPHEN E.
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY
LETTER
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 2021705
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHOR:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 1~0052 DATE: 0~/00/87
"RESPONSES TO U.S. EPA COMMENTS ON THE REMEDIAL
INVESTIGATION/FEASIBILITY STUDY DRAFT REPORT FOR
MILL CREEK1. MONTANA"
NOT INDICATED
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY (AMC>
NOT INDICATED
USEPA-VIII
MISCELLANEOUS
PAGES: 1 iZI
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE: 20217~5
TITLE/SUBJECT:
AUTHO R :
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESSEE:
ORGANIZATION:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NUMBER: 100053 DATE:
"SUMMARY OF FINAL FS CORRECTIONS -
SEPTEMBER 23" 1987" < BUS INESS CARD
PROJECT ENGINEER FOR DAMES & MOORE
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
NOT INDICATED
MISCELLANEOUS
0~/23/87 PAGES: 5
MILL CREEK, MONTANA RI/FS
OF MICHAEL SHAFF RON,
IS ATTACHED'
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- |