AIR POLLUTANT
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE
Public Health Service
Environmental Health Service
ป
-------
Office of Air Programs Publication No. APTD-0881
-------
METROPOLITAN INDIANAPOLIS
AIR POLLUTANT
EMISSION INVENTORY
prepared by:
Alan J. Hoil'raan
u.s. DEPARTMENT: OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE
PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE "
Consumer Protection and Environmental lies 1th Service
Natiorial Air Pollution Control Administration
Division of Air Quality and Emission Data
Durham, North Carolina
December, 1968
-------
_ ACKNOWLEDGMENT ........
We acknowledge with appreciation the contributions of Local and State
agencies in the gathering of data for this report. In particular,
we are grateful for the use of data and personnel assistance
furnished by the following:
1. Indianapolis Bureau of Air Pollution Control.
2. Indiana State Air Pollution Control Board.
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
~ " Page
Preface 1
Introduction 7' 3
Summary of Emissions 4
Study Area . 7
Coordinate System 11
Discussion of Results 13
Fuel Combustion by Stationary Sources 13
Transportation 24
Refuse Disposal 30
Industrial Process Losses 30
'
Point Source Emissions 30
Methodology 34
Fuel Consumption by Stationary Sources . . 34
Transportation 35
Refuse Disposal ... 35
'
Industrial Process Losses ..... 36
' Emissions by Grid . . . 38
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(CONTINUED)
Page
Emission Density 44
References 51
Appendix 53
-------
FIGURES
FjLgure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
1-
2:
3:
4:
5:
6:
7:
8:
9:
Indianapolis Grid Coordinate Map
Location of Point Sources in The-
Indianapolis Study Area
Population Density for the Study Area . . .
Sulfur Oxide Emission Density from All
Sources
Particulate Emission Density from All
Sources
Carbon Monoxide Emission Density fro-
.All Sources
Hydrocarbon Emission Density from All
Sources Surveyed
Nitrogen Oxide Emission Density from All
Page
8
12
37
45
46
47
48
49
Sources 50
-------
TABLES
Page
Table 1: Summary of Air Pollutant Emissions
in the Indianapolis Study Area 6
Table 2: Area and Fopulation Characteristics for
the Study Area 9
Table 3: Summary of Fuel Consumption in
Stationary Sources ... 14
Table 4: Summary of Fuel Consumption by
Jurisdiction for Stationary Sources ... 15
Table 5: Sulfur and Ash Contents of Fuels
Consumed in the Area 17
Table 6: Summary of Fuel Consumption in Steam -
Electric Utilities ..... 18
Table 7: Summary of Air Pollutant Emissions from
Fuel Consumption in Stationary Sources . 19
Table 8: Summary of Air Pollutant Emissions from
Fuel Consumption in Stationary Sources . 20
Table 9: Air Pollutant Emissions from Fuel
Consumption in Stationary Sources by
Jurisdiction .,.......-._._.;.. 22
Table 10: Vehicle Miles and Motor Fuel
Consumption in the Study Area 25
Table 11: Aircraft Operations for the Indianapolis
Study Area 26
table 12: Summary of Air Pollutant Emissions
from Motor Vehicle Sources 27
-------
Table 13^.
Table 14r
Table 15:
Table 16:
Table 17:
TABLES
(CONTINUED)
Air Pollutant Emissions from -
Aircraft at Weir Cook Field .
Solid Waste Disposal by Jurisdiction
for the~Study Area -. . .
Air Pollutant Emissions from Solid
Waste Disposal Practices . . . .
Summary of Point Source Emissions
by Season for the Study Area
Summary of Total Emissions by Season
for the Study Area
Page
29
. 31
32
39
41
-------
PREFACE
This report, which presents the emission inventory of the
Indianapolis metropolitan area, is another in a series of studies
outlining the sources and emissions of air pollutants for major
metropolitan areas in the country. These reports provide estimates
of total emissions of oxides of sulfur, particulates, carbon
monoxide, hydrocarbons and oxides of nitrogen. The emissions of
these pollutants are delineated with respect to source type,
season of the year; as well as their geographical distribution
within the area. These surveys are also intended to determine the
present level of emissions and status of their control in metropolitan
areas.
The general procedure for these surveys is based on the rapid
1
survey technique. The Study Area is divided into grid zones that
serve as the basis for locating sources and reporting their emissions.
All sources of pollution are classified into two general groups i.e.
point sources and area sources. All sources that emit large quantities
of air pollutants are considered individually and located specifically
within the Area. This group, which generally contains about fifty
to one hundred sources, typically includes large industries,
-------
INTRODUCTION
The information and data presented in this report were gathered
in cooperation with the Indiana State Air Pollution Control Board
and the Indianapolis Bureau of Air Pollution Control during a survey
conducted in October,1968. The data obtained in this study is
representative of 1967 and emission estimates presented herein
should be considered as describing.the levels and conditions during
1967.
For the purposes of this survey, a Study Area consisting of
eight counties in the Indianapolis metropolitan area was selected.
The Study Area is made up of one Standard Metropolitan Statistical
Area which covers 3,080 square miles and included a 1967 population
of over one million people.
The Study Area was subdivided into 46 grid zones ranging in si^e
from 25 square kilometers in the heavily populated- and industrialized
areas to 400 square kilometers in the outlying areas.
Although specific individual source information was obtained for
over 50 sources, only the largest 29 were considered as point sources.
These 29 sources are the most significant emitters in the Study Area.
-------
SUMMARY OF EMISSIONS
An estimated 1,142.000 tons of the five major pollutants are
emitted annually in the Study Area. .All major sources excluding
organic solvent evaporation were included. in this survey. Breakdowns
of this total with respect to specific pollutants as well as the type
of sources emitting these pollutants are given in Table 1 and are
summarized below.
Pollutant Type:
Oxides of Sulfur: Total Tons per year, 163,940
Industrial Process - 3%
Particulates:
Industry 207,
Transportation 2%
Other . 970
Total tons per year, 78,410
Transportation ' ' 57,
Industrial Process 137o
Refuse TL
Steam - electric 5TL
Industry ' 10%
Other B'l
-------
Carbon Monoxide:
Hydrocarbons: _
Nitrogen Oxides
Total Tons per year, 756,730
Road vehicles 82%
1 oฐ/
Industrial Process J-J/ฐ
Solid Waste 37ฐ
97
Other 2/0
Total Tons per year, 74^430
Road vehicles 91%
Stationary fuel use 3%
Other 67ฐ
Total Tons per year, 68,750
QQ7
Road vehicles Jy'ฐ
Steam - Electric Utilities 27%
Industrial Fuel use 18%
Other
-------
Table 1 SUMMARY OF AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS
IN THE INDIANAPOLIS STUDY AREA,
1967 (Tons/Year)
Source
SO
PART.
. CO-
HC
X
NO
Transportation
Gasolin.e
Diesel
Evaporation
Aircraft
Stationary Fuel
: Combustion
Industry
Steam - Electric
Residential
Commer ic al and
. -Institutional
Solid Waste
Industrial Process
TOTAL
2,280
1,640
640
neg.
157,160
33,090
107,700
9,940
.
6,430
neg.
4,500
163,940
4,360
2 , 190
1,770
...ADO
58,870
7,750
44 , 100
3,560
.
3,460
5 , 180
10,000
78,410
622,510
516,280
970
---
5,260
9,560
1,450
460
4,350
.
3,300
27,660
97,000
756,730
69,340
43,110
2,180
23,030
1,020
2,470
.520
180
1,070
700
1,620
1,000
74.430
27,340
23,300
3,560
480
36,240
12,510
18,340
2,700
2,690
3,570
1,600
68,750
r-
-------
- STUDY AREA
As shdwn in Figure 1, the Study Area encompasses the city of
Indianapolis and includes the following eight counties: (1) Boone,
(2) Hamilton, (3) Hancock, (4) Hendrick, (5) Johnson, (6) Marion.
(7) Morgan and (8) Shelby. Over 72 percent of the Study Area's
1967 population of 1,050,000 were residing in the urban area of
Marion County. The.1960 and 1967 populations of each of the eight
counties are presented in Table 2. Comparison- of 1960. and 1967
population shows an increase of 11.4 percent as compared to an
increase of 10.9 percent for the United States during the same period.
The major manufacturing industries of the Area are those
concerned.with the automotive industry and heavy machinery. The
greatest portion of this heavy industry is located in the city of
Indianapolis or in Marion County.
The Indianapolis Study Area is situated in the central part
of the state and is located on mostly level or slightly rolling
terrain. This situation along with the fact that precipitation
is well distributed throughout the year, make the area suitable
for fanning.
The climate is continental, with warm summers and moderately
cold winters. In the winter the wind speed averages about 12 m.p.h.
r, n
-------
1
I MADISON ' DELAWARE
I
N
0 ;. 10 15 20 55
'i^Sa
inif ES
50
Figure 1. Indianapolis study area.
-------
Table 2 AREA AND POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS FOR
THE INDIANAPOLIS STUDY AREA, 1967
1967 1960 Area
Population Population 70 inc. or deer. Sq. Mi.
TOTAL
1,052,400
944,475
11.4
Pop. der.sity
Persons 'Sc. Mi.
Boone
Hamilton
Hancock
Hendricks
Johnson
Marion
Morgan
i
Shelby
29,700
47,500
32,800
49,800
51,900
762,000
41,500
37,200
27,543
40,132
26,665
40,896
43,704
697,567
' 33,875
34,093
.
t "70*3
+ 7.0J
+ 18.35
+ 23.0
+ 21.8
+ 18.8
i ft O
+ 9.^
+ 22.5
ft i
+ 9.1
427
401
305
417
315
400
406
409
69.6
118.5
107-5
119.4
164. S
1,905.0
102.2
90.9
.
3,080
-------
out of the vest - northwest whereas the rest of the
prevailing wind direction is southwest at 10 e.p.r,-
10
-------
,~ COORDINATE SYSTEM
Grid coordinates based on the Universal Transverse Mercator
system were used in this study to show the geographical distribu-
tion of sources and emissions. As shown in Figure 2, the Study
Area was divided into 46 grids of three different sizes - 25, 100,
and 400 square kilometers.
Different size grids are used to limit the number of grid
zones and yet allow a satisfactory definition of geographical grada-
tion of emissions in areas where the majority of pollution occurs.
f ... .-
For this' reason the 25 square kilometer grids are used in the downtown
" ^ . . areas, where the density of emissions would change abruptly within
short distances. In areas primarily rural in nature, the use of
small zones are not as important.
As illustrated in Figure 2 each grid line is identified by a
coordinate number. The north - south and the east - west coordinates
ซ '
.-.. are expressed in meters.
* The point sources are identified by both horizontal and vertical
coordinates to the nearest 100 meters. The grids are identified by
the coordinates of the geographical center.
-------
43 r
i
"44
BOONE CO.
I
30
I
I ....
i,
11 i
HEh
6 L
MOR
1
1
1 1
1
1
31
12
DRICKS CO.
7 -
CAN CO.
2
'
.
-
451
1
1
46
HAMILTON CO.
38
i
1
32
MARION
23
19
24
20
1.3
!
39
35
33
CO.
25
21
16
14
36
34 '
26
22
17
15
JOHNSC
3
1
L
40
37
r
27
18 1
"1
)N CO.
"!
I
l
1
28
4
1
L-
1
HANCOO
SHI
42
29
CO.
.
10
ELBY CO.
"
1
.5 '
""1
r1
i
i
^370000
520000
540000
560000
530000
GOOOOO
10
10
miles
10 ' 0
10
kilometers
Figure 2. Indianapolis grid coordinate map.
-------
DISCUSSION OF RESULTS
All the sources of air pollution considered in this survey
fall into one of the foil-owing four categories :_1
1. Fuel combustion in stationary sources
2. Transportation
3. Refuse Disposal
4. Industrial process losses
Each of these categories are considered individually in this
section and also in the subsequent section where data sources are
given and methods of calculation are discussed.
. It is important to note that the estimates presented herein
and especially in the process loss category are, in most cases,
partial totals. This steins from the inavailability of emission
factors as well as appropriate production data. In the case of
hydrocarbon emissions where gasoline evaporation-was included
but solvent evaporation was not, the totals are considerably lower
than actual values. The results should be viewed with these limitations
in mind.
Fuel Combustion by Stationary Sources
Tables 3 and 4 present the fuel consumption within the Study
Area. As shown in these tables, coal is the primary fuel used in the
-------
Table 3 SUMMARY OF FUEL CONSUMPTION IN
STATIONARY SOURCES FOR THE STUDY
AREA, 1967
Source
Steam - electric
i
Industry
Residential
Coal
1,000's Tons
1,805
1,050
170
Residual Fuel
Oil (106 gal.)
0.1
12.4
neg.
Distillate
Fuel Oil
(106 gal.)
0
12.2
150.3
Natural Gas
108 Ft.3
0
123.0
291.2
Commercial and
Institutional
115
neg.
45.0
94.5
TOTAL
3,140
12.5
207.5
508.7
14
-------
Table"" 4 SUMMARY OF FUEL CONSUMPTION BY 'JURISDICTION FOR
_ STATIONARY SOURCES IN THE STUDY AREA, 1967
County
Distillate Fuel Oil
106 gal.
Res. Ind. C&I
Residual
Fuel Oil
6
10 gal.
1,000
Res.
Coal
s -- Tons
a
Ind. C&I
Natural Gas
108 Ft3
Res. Ind. C&I
- Boone
Hamilton
Hancock
He nd ricks
1
.Johnsqn
Marion
Morgan
Shelby
4.9
9.2
3.9
8.3
7.5
106.0
5.1
5.4
0.2
0.3
0.1
neg.
0.2
11.0
0.1
0.3
1.5
2.0
0.5
1.0
0.5
34.0
2.0
3.5
0.2
0.4
0.1
neg.
0.3
11.0
0.1
0.4
8
11
7.
8
8
107
12
9
neg. neg.
65 neg.
neg. neg.
neg. neg.
10 neg.
1,920 115
870 neg.
neg. neg.
6.5
6.5
7.4
7.3
8.7
.. 241.5
6.4
6.9
1.8
3.0
1.3
0.3
2.8
109.0
1.1
3.7
1.9.
2.2
1.4
1.7
2.3
80.0
1.6
3.4
V; TOTAL
. 150.3 12.2 45.0 ' 12.5
170 2,855 115 291.2 123.0 94.5
a. includes steam - electric power plants
b. neg = negligible
Res = Residential
Ind = Industrial
C&I = Commercial and Institutional.
-------
area. During 1967, about 220 million gallons of oil, 51 billion
cubic feet of gas and 3,140 thousand tons of coal were burned
within the Study Area. In terms of the total energy supplied,
coal accounted for 49 percent, fuel oil 20 percent and natural
" 3,4 '
gas 31 percent. The average physical characteristics of the
fuels are summarized in Table 5. -
The industries and steam - electric utilities are the largest
fuel users in the Area. During 1967, they consumed more than 90
percent of the coal and 25 percent of the natural gas.
The fuel consumption by steam - electric utilities is
presented in Table 6. This also shows the type of control equipment
5
and estimated efficiencies. Since most of the control equipment
is old, the efficiencies are low.
Natviral gas and fuel oil are of about equal .importance as
fuels to provide heat for homes and apartments. As shown in
Table 7 about 44% of the units use gas and 49% were heated by
distillate fuel oil. The use of coal is significant but its use
is declining. Since I960 the number of dwelling-units burning
6.
coal has decreased by almost two thirds. The number of homes
heated by fuel oil has remained just about constant over the sasie
period.
The emissions resulting from the burning of these fuels are
summarized in Table 8 and by jurisdiction in Table 9; The use of
fuels is the largest source of- sulfur oxides in the Area accounting
16
-------
. Table 5 SULFUR AND ASH CONTENTS OF FUELS
CONSUMED IN THE INDIANAPOLIS STUDY AREA, 1967
Fuel
7. Sulfur
7, Ash
Coal
Commercial and
Retail
Industrial
Electric Utility
Metallurgical
Residual Fuel Oil
Distillate Fuel Oil
Natural Gas
1.0 - 2.2
1.4 - 3.4
1.8 - 3.5
0.8
1.7
0.28
"o.ooos
5.8 - 6.5
6.2 - 8.0
7.6 - 8.6
4.5
17
-------
Table 6 SUMMARY OF FUEL CONSUMPTION IN STEAM -
ELECTRIC POWER PLANTS IN THE STUDY 'AREA, .1967,
Plant
E. W. Stout
Perry K & W
H. T. Prichard
Noblesville
Coal
1,000's Tons
820
50
870
65
Fuel Oil
1,000's gal.
0
0
0
130
Natural Gas
106 Ft3
0
0
0
0
:
Controls
ESP and Mechanical
Mechanical
ESP and Mechanical
Mechanical
Overoll
Estimated
Efficiency
60
50
70
60
TOTAL
1,805
130
a. ESP - Electrostatic Precipitator
b. Mechanical - Mechanical collectors; consists of cyclone
collectors or baffles, separately or in
combination.
-------
Table 7 SUMMARY OF DOMESTIC HEATING
UNITS BY FUEL TYPE FOR TIIE STUDY
AREA 1967
.County
Boone
Hamilton
Hancock
Hendricks
.Johnson
Marion
Morgan
Shelby
Total Units
9,UO
13,250
8,970
13,320
13,700
215,110
10,600
10,440
Coal
1,100
1,500
1,000
1,200
1,200
17,000
1,700
1,200
Oil
4,200
7,900
3,450
7,540
6,950
103,200
4,770
4,920
Gas
3,840
3,850
4,520
4,580
5,550
94,910
4,130
4,320
TOTAL
294,530
23,300
142,930
128.SOD
IS
-------
Table 8 SUMMARY OF AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS
FROM FUEL CONSUMPTION IN STATIONARY
SOURCES FOR THE STUDY AREA, 1967 (Tons/Year)
Source
SO
- X
Part.
CO
HC
lid
X
Industry
Coal
Fuel Oil
Natural Gas
TOTAL
Residential
Coal
Fuel Oil
Natural Gas
TOTAL
Commercial and
Institutional
Coal
Fuel Oil
Natural Gas
TOTAL
31,150
1,940
neg.
33,090
6,580
3,350
10
9,940
5,440
990
neg.
6,430
7,410
230
110
7,750
2,770
600
190
3,560
-..
3.030
340
90
3,460
1,430
20
neg.
1,450
4,190
150
10
4,350
3,250
50
neg.
3,300
500
20
neg.
520
840
230
neg.
1,070
650
50
neg.
700
10.200
990
1,320
12,510
670
910
1,120
2?700
520
1,620
550
2,690
.20
-------
Table 8 SUMMARY OF AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS
FROM FUEL CONSUMPTION IN STATIONARY
SOURCES FOR THE STUDY AREA, 1967 (Tons/Year)
(CONTINUED)
Source SO
X
Part.
CO -
HC
NO
X
Steam-Electric
Coal . 107 , 700
Fuel Oil neg.
Natural Gas 0
Total 107,700
TOTAL
Coal 150,870
Fuel Oil 6,280
Natural Gas 10
44,100
neg.
0
44,100
57,310
1,170
390
460
neg.
0
460
9,330
220
10
180
neg.
0
180
2,170
300
neg.
18,340
neg.
0
18,340
29,730
3,520
2,990
Total
157,160
58,870 - 9,560'
2,470
36,240
-------
TABLE 10 VEHICLE MILES AND MOTOR FUEL CONSUMPTION IN
THE STUDY AREA, 1967
County
' Boone
Hami 1 ton
Hancock
Henclricks
Johnson
Marion
Morgan
Shelby
Total
Gasoline
1000's gal. /year
11,000
20,620
11,770
15,980
26,050
331,700
14,020
12,660
443,800
Diesel
1000's gal ./.year
940
1,760
1,000
1,360
2,220
28,240.
1,200
1,030
37..800
Total vehicle Miles
1000's/day
380
720
410
560
910
11,550
490
440
15,460
-------
TABLE 11 AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS AT
WEIR-COOK FIELD, 1967
Itinerant Operation/Year
Air Carrier 80,631
GeneraT ~ 37,487
Military ' 2,468
Total 170,583
Local
General 44,858
Military . 4,479
Total " 49,337
Total 219,923
Total Air Carrier . 80,631
Total General . 132,345
Total Military 6,947
Total 219,923
2C
-------
TABLE 12 SUMMARY OF AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS FROM MOTOR VEHICLE
SOURCES IN THE STUDY AREA, 1967 (TOMS/YEAR)
COUNTY
Boone
Hami.lton
Hancock
Hcndricks
Johnson
SOURCE
ga-soline
Diesel
Evaporation
Total
Gasoline
Diesel
Evaporation
Total
Gasoline
Diesel
Evaporation
Total
Gasoline
Diesel
Evaopration
Total
Gasoline
Diesel
Evaopration
Total
SO
40
~ 20
--
60
80
30
--
110
40
20
--
60
60
20
CO
90
40
--
130
PART .
50
50
__
100
100
80 .
--
180
60
50
".
110
80
60
--
140
130
100
--
230
27
CO
8,980
- 20
__
9,000
18,440
60
18,500
11,600
30
--
11,630
15,230
40
--
15,320
25,140
60
--.
25,200.
liC
710
50
570
1,330
1,430
100
1,070
2,600
890.
60
600
1,550
.1,170
80
830
0 ooo
t- j ซ_'O L.'
1,920
130
1,350
3,400
NOX
570
90
--
660
1,090
160
--
1,250
620
100
--
720
84C
130
--
970
1,360
210
--
1,570
-------
TABLE 12 SUMMARY OF AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS FROM MOTOR VEHICLE
SOURCES iN THE STUDY AREA, 1967 (TONS/YEAR)
COUNTY "
Marion
Morgan
Shelby
Total
Study
Area
SOURCE
Gasoline
Diesel
Evaopration
Total
Gasoline
Diesel
Evaopration
Total
Gasoline
Diesel
Evaporation
Total
Gasoline
Diesel
Evaopration
Total
SOX
1^230
470
1,700
50
20
__
70
50
20
__
70
1,640
640
__
. 2,280
PART .
1,640
1,320
--
2,960
70
60
--
130
60
50
--
110
2,190
1,770
--
3,960
co - -
512,800
~700
--
513,500
12,570
30
--
12,600
11,500
30
--
11,500
616,280
970
~-T~
617,250
MiC
35,170
1,630
17,200
54,000
960
70
730
1 ,760
1,600
60
660
1,600
43,110
2,180
23,030
68,320
ซ!O /
i<0x
17,400
2,650
--
20,060
750
no
--
860
770
100
__
770
23,300
3,560
--
26,360.
*._ =
applicable
-------
TABLE 13 AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS FROM AIRCRAFT
AT"WEIR COOK FIELD, 1957 (TS-YEAR)
- - - - - '-- ---'--- ' - - - ' ' -. ... __ _
Type of
Operation
Air Carrier
General
Aviation
Military
Total
SOX
Neg.
Neg.
Neg .
Neg,
PART .
325
70
5
400
CO
1,000
4,050
"210
5,260
HC
200
760
40
1.020
NOX
250
220
10
480
-------
source of pollution. In 1967, they accounted for 99 percent of the
carbon monoxide, 98 percent of the hydrocarbons, 98 percent of the
oxides of nitrogen, 91 percent of the particulates and 100 percent
of the sulfur oxides (of the total transportation emissions). Diesel
fuel powered vehicles were an important source of hydrocarbons and
oxides of nitrogen.
The emissions from aircraft, although small, may be significant
in that they occur at one location rather than throughout the area
as is the case for motor vehicles.
Refuse Disposal
The estimated tonnages of refuse disposal is summarized in Table 1-
Nearly all of the refuse is disposed of by open or on site burning.
However, after January 1, 1968, there was a ban on open burning and
it is hoped that a municipal incinerator will be in operation later
in the year. The estimates were determined by applying a percapita
8
generation rate of 4.5 Ib. per day. These are rough estimates and
should be considered as such.
The emissions from refuse burning are.summarized in Table 15.
Industrial Process Losses.
Emissions in this category were found by applying emission factors
to production rate data for the various industries. The emissions are
presented in Table 1.
Point Source Emissions.
Total point source emissions which included both fuel burning
and process information are presented in Table 16. Point sources
-------
TABLE 14 SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL BY JURISDICTION
FOR THE INDIANAPOLIS STUDY- -
AREA, 1967 (TONS/YEAR)
COUNTY
Boone
Hami 1 ton
Hancock
Hendricks
Johnson
Marion
Morgan
Shelby
Total
1967
Population
29,700
47,500
32,800
49,800
51,900
762,000
41,500
37,200
1,052,400
Refuse
Generated3
24,390
39,000
26,940
40,900
42,620
625,750
34,080
30,550
864,230
Amount
Burned
18,290
29,250
20,210
30,680
" 31,960
469,300
25,560
22,910
648,160
Non-combustibles
6,100
9,750
6,730
10,220
10,660
156,450
8,520
7,640
216,070
*a=Refuse generated at the rate of 4.5 lb. per person per day
b= on-site incineration or open burning
31
-------
TABLE 15 AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS BY JURISDICTION FROM SOLID
HASTE DISPOSAL FOR THE INDIANAPOLIS-STUDY AREA, 1967 (TONS/YEAR)
COUNTY
Boonc
Hamilton
Hancock
Hendricks
Johnson
Marion
Morgan
Shelby
Total
SOX
0
0 -
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
PART.
145
"235
160
245
255
3,760
200
180
5,130
CO
780
1,270
860
1 ,300
1,380
20,000
1,100
970.
27,660
- - -HC -
45
: 75
50
75
80
1,170
65
60
1 ,620
ซ0x
100
150
no
170
175
o con
ฃ,_:...
140
125
3,G73
r: 9
V- >'<
-------
collectively accounted for the following percentages of the total
pollutants:
Sulfur Oxides: 90%
Particulates: 81% - - -
Carbon Monoxide: 14%
Hyd.orcarbons: 4% -
Nitrogen Oxides: 49%
r-. O
30
-------
METHODOLOGY - - '
The following discussion is a summary of procedures used in the
Indianapolis emission inventory.
' Fuel Consumption by Stationary Sources
The local air pollution agencies were contacted as to the use
of fuels in the major industrial, commercial and institutional
establishments under their jurisdiction. The large industrial facilities
and steam electric utilities consumed 91 percent of the coal but only
11 percent of the oil and 24 percent of the gas. On the basis of
this information 95 percent of the coal and 10 percent of the residual
fuel oil burned in the area was accounted for by point sources. The
balance of the fuel was distributed to the three area source categories
of fuel consumption: (1) residential, (2) commercial - institutional
(this includes federal facilities) and (3) industrial.
The amount of fuel burned for home heating purposes was calculated
using the procedure described in the Rapid Survey Technique. The
method includes such variables, as total annual degree days, average
number of rooms per dwelling unit, and the number of units using
each type of fuel. It was assumed that all fuel oil burned for
residential use was distillate.
Commercial - institutional fuel consumption figures were not
available except in the case of natural gas usage in Marion County.
Fuel oil was determined by substracting residential fuel oil from
34 .
-------
county totals of residential and commercial sales supplied by the
Fuel Oil Institute. Institutional coal usage was found by
subtracting residential coal usage from the retail coal usage figures
supplied_by a local coal company.
Transportation
Emissions from this category were found by the application of
two different method depending on the type of information available.
In Marion County vehicle mile data were available through a
9
Transportation Study done in 1964. These vehicle miles of travel
were apportioned to the grid system by means of traffic flow maps
which were supplied by the Transportation Agency.
The vehicle miles were updated to 1967 and adjusted to account
for the fact that not all secondary roads were included. It was
estimated that the Transportation study accounted for 857, of the total
vehicle miles.
In the other seven counties, vehicle mile information was not
10
available and thus gasoline consumption _. was used" to find vehicular
emissions. The gasoline consumed in each county was apportioned on
a grid basis.by population.
Emissions from diesel jspwered vehicles were determined by diesel
fuel consumption in each 'county. These emissions were apportioned
on a grid basis by assuming they were proportional to gasoline emissions.
Refuse Disposal
Emissions in this category were determined by assuming a percapita
generation rate of 4.5 pounds -of refuse per day. By personal contact with
35
-------
local agencies it was found that no large incinerators or large
open burning dumps were in operation in the Area. Thus all disposal
was assumed to be on-site incineration or open burning and emissions
were apportioned on a grid bases by populations
Industrial Process
f *ป
The various industries in the Area were contacted as to their
fuel use and production rates. From this information, industrial
process losses were determined for processes where emission factors
were available. The totals in this category are by no means complete
since time did not permit a thorough contacting of all industry in
the Area. However, information on most of the major industries was
available and this should represent a large percentage of the total
in this category.
The following is a brief description of the number and types of
industry contacted. All the large foundries in the Area supplied
production data. Of these six foundries, which ranged in size from
200 to 250,000 tons per year, only two had any air pollution control
equipment. Four concrete or asphalt batching plants were surveyed,
of which only one had control equipment. There was one glass
manufacturing plant and one oil refinery which was not equipped with
a waste heat boiler. In addition several grain handling and storage
elevators were contacted. However emissions from these facilities
were not significant.
Figure 3 shows the location of the major point source emitters
in the Study Area.
of)
-------
1
,
-
BOONE CO.
i
:"
1
<
,
I,
j
j HEt>
I
.
}
I
/
> MOF
1 ,
1
,
-
DRICKS CO.
_J
CAN CO.
13
'
.
H
en
HAMILTON CO.
ซs.
X
L MARION
X X
XX
Ci
CO.
X.
A 'v
XX
X
T"
JOHNSt
1
1
f
1
X
X
X,
/N.
\
1
1
1
___
J-
1
)N CO.
1
I
1
-
HANCOO
CO.
SHELB^LCO.
'
1
f
1
1
1
I
I
4370000
4350000
4430000
4410000
4390000
N
520000
540000
560000
58ฐ000
600000
10
10
miles
10 0 10
kilometers
o Commercial
X Industrial
Q Power plant
Figure 3 .Location of Point Sources
f. I1';'
0 -'
-------
Emissions by Grid
Table 17 presents the total emissions from all sources for each
of the 46 grids in the Indianapolis Study Area. The previous sections
of the report describe how each category was .apportioned by grid.
These subtotals were added to the point sources to arrive at the total
emissions" per day. -The Appendix describes the/.procedure for the
calculation of the annual as well as the summer and winter emission
averages for a point source. However, the same procedure, with
some modifications for transportation, is used for area sources as
well.
30
O
-------
TABLE 16 SUMMARY OF POINT SOURCE EMISSIONS BY SEASON FOR THE INDIANAPOLIS STUDY AREA, 1967 (TOMS/DAY)
Horizontal -Vertical
Category Coordinates S
Power Plant
Pov/er Plant
Industrial
Industrial
Industrial
Industrial .
Industrial
Industrial
Industrial .
Commercial
Industrial
Industrial
> Connnercial
' Pov/er Plant
Industrial .
Industrial
Industrial
Industrial
Industrial
, Industrial
i
Industrial
55000
56900
'56730
56650
57230
57050
56700
56510
56350
56970
56950
57350
57100
57100
. 57250
57060
57100
57300
57140
57640
57380
. 43710
43960
43990
43990
43990
43993
44003
44035
44015
44033
44015
44018
44035
44024
44011
44013
44003
44016
44010
44030
44068
126'.81
149-. 40
1..64
2.50
3.77
' 0.41
21.53
3.31
1.00
5.73
2.28
--
1.75
9.30
1.90
1.90
0.68
2.14
0.13
1.90
SOX
VI
126.81
149.40
2.26
' '3.71
5.22
3.17
28.45
4.37
1.33
18.41
I 3.32
--
5.52
9.30
5.36
' 5.36
1.51
3.61
0.18
5.36...
A
126.81
149.40
1.93
3.12
4.43
2.04
25.33
3.89
1.25
11.45
2.85
--
3.44
9.30
3.80
3.80
1.14
2.85
0.16
3.80
S
49.20
61.11
0.57
0.88
1.32
0.14
2.62
0.69
0.35
2.33
0.80
0.07
1.82
4.75
0.43
0.33
0.24
0.67
0.04
0.40
0.51
,
PART.
[!
49.20
61.11
0..79
1.30
1.83
1.11
3.14
'0.91
0.49
7.49
1.16
0.07
5.84
4.75
1.22
0.94
0.53
1.14
0.06
1.13
\ 0.51
o
O
A
49.20
61.11
0.68
1.09
1.56
0.71
2.90
0.81
0.44
4.66
1.00
0.07
3.63
4.75
0.87
0.67
0.40
0.90
0.05
0.80
-"tf.51
c
s
0.60
0.56
0.04
0.07
0.10
0.01
87.72
0.09
0.03
3.42
0.06
1.03
1.03
0.04
0.05
0.05
0,02
0.06
0.01
0,05
CO
W
0.60
0.56
0.06
0.10
0.1.4
0.08
88.41
0.11
0.04
11.07
0.09
1.03
3.30
0.04
0.14
0.14
0.04
0.09
0..01
0.14
A
0.60 .
0.56
0.05
0.08
0.12
0.05
88.10
0.10
0.03
6.P-5
0.07
1.03
2.05
0.04
0.02
0.10
0.03
0.07
0.01
0.10
S
0.24
0.23
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.00
0.71
0.03
0.01
. 0.63
0.02
--
0.21
0.01
0.05
0.02
0.01;
0.02
0.01
0.02
IIC
W
0.24
0.23
0.02
0.03
0.05
0.03
0.94
0.04
0.01
2.20
0.03
--
0.66
0.01
0.03
0.05
0.01
0.03
0.01.
0.05
A
0.24
0.23
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.02
0.83
0.03
0.01
1.37
0.03
--
0.41
0.01
0.03
0.03
0.01
0.03
0.01
0.03
S
23.84
22.47
0.29
0.44
0.66
0.07
14.17
0.59
0.18
-0.55
0.40
--
0.16
1.40
0.33
0.33
0.12
0.38
0.21
0.33
f'.'Oy
W
.23.84
22.47
0.40
0.65 '
0.92
0.56'
18.72
0.78 '
0.24
1.76
0.58
--
0.53
1.40
0.94
0.94
0.27
0.63
0.28
0.94
A
23.84
22.47
0.34
0.55
o.?.-;
0.36'
16.67
O.f.,9
0.22
1.10 .
o.'so""'-
--
0.33
1.40
0.67
O.G7
0.20
0.50
0.25
0.67
-------
TABLE 16 SUMMARY OF POINT SOURCE EMISSIONS BY SEASON FOR THE INDIANAPOLIS STUDY AREA, 19G7 (TONS/PAY)
Horizon :al -Vertical
Category Coorh'nates
.Industrial
Industrial
Industrial
Industrial
Industrial
Industrial
Power Plant
57 ;30
58 '.'00
58 ;oo
58150
56430
58780
44020
44063.
44015
44003
44070
44185
44390
S
1.52'
4.25,
4.97.
0.7GJ
1.52*
12.50
6.87
SOX
u
2.14
5.25
8.84
6.30
5.67
12.50
6.87
A
1.90
4.72
7.09
3.80
3.80
12.50
9.51
S
0.53
1.49
1.60
0.27
0.53
0.14
4.05
PART.
1.1
0.75
1.84
2.85
2.21
1.99
0.14
4.05
A
0.67
1.66
2.23
V.33
1.33
0.14
5.60
S
0.04
0.11
0.11
0.02
0.04
171.30
0.05
CO
W
0.06
0.14
0.20
0.17
0.15
171.30
0.05
A
0.05.
0.12
0.16
1.10
0.10
171.30
0.06
S
0.01
0.04
0.04
0.01
0.01
2.75
0.02
"S
0.02
0.05
0.07
0.06
0.05
2.75
0.02
A
0.01
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
2.75
0.03
S
0.27
.0.75
0.90
0.13
0.27
4.38
1.82
W
0 . 33
0.92
1.60
1.10.
0.99-
4.38
1.82
A
0.33
0.83
1.28.
0.67
0.67
4.38
2.53
40
-------
TABLE 17 SUMMARY OF TOTAL EMISSIONS BY SEASON FOR THE INDIANAPOLIS STUDY AREA, 1967 (TOMS/DAY)
Grid
1
2
3
4.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
^ 13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Area
.KM2
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
100
25
25
25
25
100 '
25
25
S
0.00
0.11
0.08
0.06
0.01
0.04
128.69
0,28
0.17
0.16
0.04
0.33
155.96
0.17
0.03
A n o
ป to
0.18
0.20
0.19
34.20
SOx
W
0.18
1.40
0.61
0.42
"0.26
0.47
129.93
1.09
1.25
1.98
0.46
2.20
'159.61
0.55
0.54
10.89
1.72
0,86
1.82
59.44
A
0:il
0.69
0.32
OJ22
0.19
0.24
127.52
1.11
0.67
1.05
0.25
1.22
155.64
0.35
0.26
7 ,.78
0.88
0.50
1,.'43
47.07
S
0.03
25.40
0.25
'0.18
0.05
0.14
50.72
1.15
0.57
0.62
,0.13
1.04
64.46
0.39
0.17
2.50
0,68
0.51
0.50
7.91
PART.
H
0.10
25.87
0.43
0.29
0.14
0.30
50.72
1.65
0.80
1.26
0.27
1.57
65.62
0.47
0.34
4.65
1.16
0.67 .
0.95
15.24
A
0.07
25.62
0.34
0.24
0.11
0.22
57.82
1 .40
0.73
0.94
0.20
1.32
64.19
0.44
0.25
3.64
0.91
.0.60
0.87
11.52
S
1.41
. 15.76
11.45
8.54
1.93
5.76
22.43
54.00
32.03
26.23
. 5.26
59.59
68.77
33.19
6.39
67.78
39.70
39.31
44.33
189.03
CO
.W
1,25
12.85
9.02
6.70
1.56
4.65
17.93
42.02
24.88
21.04
4.21
47.51
52.28
25.15
5.17
52.54
30.88
30.13
33.80
174.55
. A
1.35
15.15
10.88
8.11
1.85
5.42
21.42
51.03
30.27
25.06
5.02
58.00
65.86
31.15
6.10
64.03
37.54
36.94
41.72
187.17
S
. 0.19
2.27
1.67
1.25
0.27
0.83
2.99
. 6.75
4.05
3.54
0.76
7.81
8.93
4.27
0.73
7.84
4.57
5.05
5.18
11.60
HC
W
0.16
' 1.89
1.33
0.99
0.23
0.68
2.46
5.30
3.18
2.90
0.61
6.08
7.00
3.26
. 0.64
6.11
3.61
3.86
3.98
11.11
A
0.19
2.21.
1.59
1.19
0.27
0.80
2.89
6.41
3.85
3.42
0.73
7.40
8.47
4.01
0.75
7.48
4.36
4.75
4.90
9.90
S
0.11
1.28
0.92
0.68
0.15
0.46
25.54
'3.46
2.01
1.91
' 0.42
3.83
27.70
1.99
' 0.43.
4.30
2.13
2.37
2.26
19.98
NOX
w
0.21
1.28
0.35
0.63
0.34
0.46
25.61
3.37
.1.87
2.10
. 0.48
3.56
27.52
1..GO
0.46
4.82.'
2.07
1.Q7
2.87
26.85
A
0.21
1.34
0.93
0 . 68
0.34
0.49
25. 3G
3.57
2.03
2.17
0.51
A . 92
27.51
1.90
0.4G
4.77
2.19
2.30
3.17
24.30
41
-------
TABLE 17 SUMMARY OF TOTAL EMISSIONS DY SEASON FOR THE INDIANAPOLIS STUDY AREA, 1%7 (TONS/DAY)
Grid
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
23
29
30
31
"32
33
!34
35
36
37
38
39
4-0
41
Area
r\i i
25
25
25
25
25
25
100
400
400
400
400
100
25
25
25
25
100
100
100
lOO^xT
400 --
S
18.58
.2.23
0.12
0.21
0.57
1.88
12.05
0.13
0.03
0.03
0.07
12.72
0.20
. \
0.18
0.12
,0.07
0.22
0.02
0.05
0.04
0.07
- SQx
W
36.66
10.02
1.65
.3.35
5.36
6.22
31.07
1.20
0.47
0.36
0.41
13.91
2.55
1.87
0;65
0.51
2.33
0.32
1.28
0.53
0.66
A
27.94
6. '59
1.'31
2.'l3
o 90
-J . do
4.46
22.52
0.63
0.23
0.13
0.23
13.31
1.76
1.15
0.36
0.26
1.19
0,16
0.64
0;30
0.34
S
10.25
1.77
. ,0.36
0.83
' 2.23
1 .82
5.55
0.47
0.10
0.13
'o.is
0.75
0.68
0.65
0.33
0.21
0.97'
0.12
0.26
0.16
0.26.
PART.
V!
17.94
3.36
0.30
1.37
3.62
3.17
11.85
0.36
0.25
0.24
. 0.29
1.04
1.38
1.12
0.48
0.34
1.55
0.22
0.67
" 0.33
0.47
A
14.03
2.95
0.71
1.49
3.03
2.63
9,03
0.65
0.17
0.13
0.25
0.89
1.15
0.92
0.40
0.28
1.20
0.17
0.47
0.26
0.36
S
195.37
121.10
28. 7G
76.25
185.39
135.30
111.17
24.63
4.01
4.85
12.40
21 2. '40
77.06
53.23
27.22
15.17
39.89
6.28
8.79
8.27 .
. 14.40
CO
W
152.23
93.32
22.01
58.76
141.48
103.41
86.23
18.62
3.31
3.90
9.68
202.82
58.89
40.89
20.79 .
11.70
31 .47
4.95
7.34
-.. G.53
,11.27
A
184.93
114.22
27.09
71.91
174.32
127.28
105.10
22.43
3.87
4.64
11.90
210. CO
72.42
50.18
25.60
14.31
37.88
5.97
8.51
7.87
. 13.65
S
' 17.60
10.83
3.34
6.79
16.62
12.12
12.94
' 2.96
0.53
0.07
1.62
..7.98
6.80
5.52
3.17
1.76
4.98
0.79
1,06
1.03
1.82
HC
I!
14.23
8.56
2.59
5.37
12.90
9.44
10.26
2.36
0.43
0.57
1.25
6.79
5.35
4.29
2.44
1.37
4.00
0.63
. 0.94
0.83
1.44
A
16-.93.
10.32
3.17
6.43
15.74
11.50
12.34
2.33
0.56
0.68
1.52
7.70
6.54
5.23
2.99
1.66
4.77
0.76
1.05
0.98
1.73
S
9.01
4.29
1.53
2.47
5.77
4.43
7.95
1.50
0.32
0.39
0.75
8.83
2.37
2.25
1.40
0.80
2.57
0.39
0.60
0.53
0.90
W
11.81
5.86
J.49
n.46
i.3'1
'1 1 . 09
1 54
0.33
0.39
0.32
6.61
3.16
2.60
- 1.21
0.73
2.56
0.39
0.83
0..63
0.87
A '
11.23
. 5.72
2. '4 2
3.5G
6.35
5.59
10.41
1.C4
0.34
0.40
0.91"
6.39
3.37
2.73
.1.33
0.30
2.67
0.41
0.79
0.6G
0.93
- n
-------
*
r
Grid
42
43
44
'45
46
Area
n2
IM'I
. 400
400
400
400
400
S
0.02
0.04
0,11
0.10
6.99
TA2LE 17
SOX
W
0.40
0.70
1.07
1.29
9.04
SUMMARY
A
0.19
0.34
0.54
0.64
10.10
OF TOTAL
S
0.07
0.15
0.43
0.31
4.96
EMISSIONS
PART.
W
0.20
0.42
0.06
0.69
5.30
BY SEASON
A
0.12
0.27
0.63
0.49
6.67
FOR THE
S
3.05
5 .81
16.03
13.21
24.50
INDIANAPOLIS
CO
W
2.53
4.86
12.95
10.64
21.85
STUDY AREA
A '
2.95
5.74
15.35
12.65
23.65
, 1967
S
0.43
0.83
2.30
1.91
2.58
(TONS/DAY)
HC
W
0.36
0.72
1.88
1.57
2.07
A
0.42
0.82
2.22
1.85
2.47
NOx
S W
0.24 0.2!i
0.46 .0.49
1.32 '..35
1.06 '.03
3.24 1...18
A
0.2G
0.50
1.39
1.09
3.98
43
-------
TABLE 16 SUMMARY OF POINT SOURCE EMISSIONS BY SEASON FOR THE INDIANAPOLIS STUDY AREA, 1967 (TOMS/DAY)
Horizontal -Vertical
Category Coordinates S
Pov/er Plant
Power Plant
Industrial .
Industrial
Industrial
Industrial
Industrial
Industrial
Industrial .
Commercial
Industrial
Industrial
Coniinercial
Pov/er Plant
Industrial
Industrial
Industrial
Industrial
Industrial .
Industrial
Industrial
55000
56900
'56730
56650
57230
57050 '
56700
56510
56350
56970
56950
57350
57100
57100
. 57250
57060
57100
57300
57140
57640
57380
43710
43960
43990
43990
'43990
43993
44003
44035
44015
44033
44015
44018
44035
44024
44011
44013
44003
44016
44010
44030
44068
126'. 81
149,. 40
1,.64
. 2.50
3.77
' 0.41
2.1.53
3.31
1.00
5.73
2.28
--
1.75
. 9.30
1.90
1.90
0.68
2.14
0.13
1.90
__ .
SOX
W
126.81
149.40
2.26
''3.71
5.22
3.17
28.45
4.37
1.38
18.41
i 3.32
--
5.52
9.30
5.36
' 5.36 .
1.51
3.61
0.18
5.36
--
A .
126.31
149.40
1 . 93
3.12
4.43
2.04
25,33
3.89
1.25
11.45
2.85
--
3.44
9.30
3.80
3.80
1.14
2.85
0.1.6
3.80
__
S
49,20
61.11
0.57
0.88
1.32
0.14
2.62
0.69
0.35
2.33
0.80
0.07
1.82
4.75
0.43
0.33
0.24
0.67
0.04
0.40
0.51
PART.
W
49.20
61.11
0..79
1.30
1.83
1.11
3.14
'0.91
0.49
7.49
1.16
0.07
5.84
4.75
1.22
0.94
0.53
1.14
0.06
1.13
-. 0.51
A
49.20^
61.11
0.68
1.09
1.56
0.71
2.90
0.81
0.44
4.66
1.00
0.07
3.63
4.75
0.87
0.67
0.40
0.90
0.05
0.80
0.51
S
0.60
0.56
0.04
0.07
0.10
0.01
87.72
0.09
0.03
3.42
0.06
1.03
1.03
0.04
0.05
0.05
0.02
0.06
0.01
0.05
--
CO
w
0.60
0.56
0.06
0.10
0.14
0.08
88.41
0.11
0.04
11.07
0.09
1.03
3.30
0.04
0.14
0.14
0,.04
0.09
0.01
0.14
--
A
0.60
0.56
'0.05
0.08
0.12
0.05
88.10
0.10
0.03
6.85
0.07
1.03
2.05
0.04
0.02
0.10
0.03
0.07
0.01
0.10
--
S
- 6.24
0.23
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.00
0.71
0.03
0.01
0.68
0.02
--
0.21
0.01
0.05
0.02
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.02
HC
W
0.24
0.23
0.02
0.03
0.05
0.03
0.94
0.04
0.01
2.20
0.03
--
0.66
0.01
0.03
0.05
0.01
0.03
0.01
0.05
--
A
0.24
0.23
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.02
0.83
0.03
0.01
1.37
0.03
--
0.41
0.01
0.03
0.03
0.01
0.03
0.01
0.03
.-
S
23.84
22.47
0.29
0.44
0.66
0.07
14.17
0.59
0.18
-0.55
0.40
--
0.16
1.40
0.33
0.33
0.12
0.38
0.21
0.33
-.-
V-'
.23.84
22.47
0.40
0.65'
0.92
0.56
18.72
0.78
0.24
1.76
0.58
--
0.53
1 .40
0.94
0.94
^ V.27
0.63
0.28
0.94
--
A
23.84
22.47
0.34
0.55
0.7'?
0.36
16.67.
O.C9
0.22
1.10
0.50
"--
0.33
1.40
0.67
0.67
0.20
0.50
0,25
0.67
--
or-
-------
TABLE 16 SUMMARY OF POINT SOURCE EMISSIONS BY SEASON FOR THE INDIANAPOLIS STUDY AREA, 19G7 (TONS/DAY)
.*
Horizontal -Vertical
Catcnory Coordinates
Industrial
Industrial
Industrial
Industrial
Industrial
Industrial
Power Plant
57630
53200
,'58150
58400
58150
5G430
58780
44020
44063
44015
44003
44070
44185
44390
S
1.52'
4.25,
4.97:
0.76J
1.521
12.50
6.87
SOX
u
2.14
5.25
8.84
6.30
5.67
12.50
6.87
A
1.90
4.72
7.09
3.80
3.80
12.50
9.51
S
0.53
1.49
1.60
0.27
0 tC*
O . Jo
0.14
4.05
PART.
U
It
0.75
1.84
2.85
2.21
1.99
0.14
4.05
' A
0.67
1.66
2.23
1.33
1.33
0.14
5.60
S
0.04
0.11
' 0.11
0.02
0.04
171.30
0.05
CO
W
0.06
0.14
0.20
0.17
0.15
171.30
0.05
A
0.05
0.12
0.16
1.10
0.10
171.30
0.06
S
0.01
0.04
0.04
0.01
0.01
2.75
0.02
HC
W
0.02
0.05
0.07
0.06
0.05
2.75
0.02
A
0.01
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
2.75
0.03
S
0.27
0.75
0.90
0.13
0.27
4.33
1.82
NOX
W
0.3S
0.92 .
1.60
1.10
.0.99
4.38
1.82
A
0.33
0.83
0.67
0.67
4.38
2.53
40
-------
,* TABLE 17 SUMMARY
-id
1
2
3
4.
5
6
7
8
9
10
n
1.2
13^
14
*
15
16
17
18
19
20
Area
KM?
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
100
25
25
25
25
100
25
25
S
0.00
0.11
0.08
0.06
.0.01
0.04
128.69
0.28
0,17
0.16
0.04
0.33
155.96
0.17
0.03
4.43 .
0.13
0.20
0.19
34,20
SOX
u
0.18
1.40
0.61
0.42
0.26
0.47
129.93
. 1.09
1.25
1.98
0.46
2.20
'159.61
0.55
0.54
10.89
l'.72
0.86 -
1.82
59.44
A
Dill
. 0.69
0.32
0^22
i
0.19
0.24
127.52
. 1.11
0.67
1.05
0.25
1.22
155.64
0.35
0.26
7,. 78
0.88
' 0.50
1..43
47.07
OF TOTAL
S
0.03
25.40
0.25
'0.18
0.05
0.14.
50.72
1.15
0.57
0.62
,0.13
1.04
64.46
0.39
0.17
2.50
. 0.68
0.51
0.50.
7.91
EMISSIONS
PART.
W
0.10
25.87
0.43
0.29
0.14
0.30
50.72
1.65'
0.80
1.26
0.27
1.57
65.62
0.47
0.34
4.65
1.16
0.67
0.95
15.24
BY SEASON FOR THE
A
0.07
25.62
0.34
0.24
0.11
0.22
57.82
1.40
0.73
0.94
0.20
1.32
64.19
0.44
0.25
3.64
0.91
0.60
0.87
11.52
S
1.41
15.76
11.45
8.54
1.93
5.76
22.43
54.00
32.03
26.23
5.26
59.59
68.77
33.19
6.39
67.78
39.70
39.31
44.33
189.03
INDIANAPOLIS STUDY AREA, 1967
CO
H
. 1.25
12.85
9.02
6.70
1.56
4.65
1 7 . 93
42.02
24.88
21.04
4.21 .
47.51
52.28
25.15
5.17
52.54
30.88
30.13
33.80
174.55
A.
1.35
15.15
LO.88
8.11
1.85
5.42
21.42
51.03
30.27
25.06
5.02
58.03
65.86
31.15
6.10
64.03
37.54
36.94
41.72
187.17
S
0.19
2.27
1.67
1.25
0.27
0.83
2.99
6.75
4.05
3.54
0.76
7.81
8.93
4.27
0.73
7.84
4.57
5.05
5.13
11.60
(TONS/DAY)
HC
W
0.16
1.89
1.33
0.99
0.23
. 0.68
2.46
5.30
3.18
2.90
0.61
6.08
7.00
3.26
. 0.64
6.11
3.61
3.86
3.98
11.11
A
0.19
2.21
1.59
1.19
0.27
U.80
2.89
6.41
3.85
3.42
0.73
7.40
8.47
4.01
0.75
7.48
4.36
4.75
4.90
9.90
S
0.11
. 1.28
0.92
0.68
0.15
0.46
25.54
3.46
2.01
1.91
0.42
3.83
27.70
1.99
0.43
4.30
2.13
2.37
2.26
19.98
NOx
W
0.21
1.28
0.85
0.63
0.34
0.46
25.61
3.37
1.37
2.10
0.48
3.56
27.52
1.60
0.46
4.82
2.07
1.97
2.87
26.85
A
0.21
1.34
0.93
0.68
0.34
0.49
25.36
3.57
2.03
2.17
0.51
4.92
27.51
1.90
0.46
4.77
2.19
2.30
3.17
24.30
41
-------
TABLE 17 SUMMARY OF TOTAL EMISSIONS BY SEASON FOR THE INDIANAPOLIS STUDY AREA, 1967 (TONS/DAY)
Area
rid KM2
?1 25
12. 25
?3 25
;?T 25
&5 25
ke 25
b 100
23 400
29 400
PO 400
31 400
32" 100
33 25
34* 25
35 25
36 25
37 100
38 ' 100
39 100
40 - lOO^x-,'
41 400
. S
18.53
,2.23
0.12
0.21
' 0.57-
1.88
12.05
0.13
0.03
0.03
0.07
12.72
0.20
\
0.18
'0.12
,0.07
0.22
0.02
0.05
0.04
0.07
SOx
W
36.66
10.02
1.65
.3.35
5.36
6.22
31.07
1.20
0.47
0.36
0.41
13.91
2.55
1.87
0;65
0.51
' 2.33
0.32
1.28
0.53
0.66
A
27 . 94
6.;59
2.'l3
3.23
4.46
22.52
0.63
. 0.23
0.13
0.23
13.31
1.76
1.15
0.36
0.26
1.19
0,16
0.64
0.30
0.34
S
10.25
1.77
. . ,0.36
Ooo .
.00
2.23
1.32
5.55
0.47
0.10
0.13
'o.is
0.75
0.68
0.65.
0.33
0.21
0.97
0.12
0.26
0.16
0.26
PART ,
V!
17.94
3.36
0.30
1.87
3.62
3.17
11.85
0.86
0.25
0.24
0.29
1.04
1.38
1.12
0.48
0.34
1.55
0.22
0.67
0.33
0.47
A
14.03 .
2.95
0.71
1.49
3.03
2.63
9,03
0.65
0.17
0.13
0.25
0.89
1.15
0.92
0.40
0.28
1.20
0.17
0.47
0.26
0.36
S
195.37
121.10
28.76
76.25
185.39
135.30
111.17
24.63
4.01
4.85
12.40
212.40 '
77.06
53.23
27.22
15.17
39.89
6.28
8.79
8.27
14.40
, ,.42
CO
. ' w
152.23
93.32
22.01
53.76
141.48
103.41
86.28
18.62
3.31
3.90
9.68
202.32
58.89
40.89
20.79
11.70
31.47
4.95
7.34
6.53
,11.27
A
184.98
114.22
27.09
71.91
174.32
1 27 . 28
105.10
22.43
3.87
4.G4
11.90
210.00
72.42
50.18
25.60
14.31
37.88
5.97
8.51
7.87
13.65
S
17.60
10.83
3.34
6.79
16.62
12.12
12.94
2.96
0.53
0.07
1.62
7.98
6.80
5.52
3.17
1.76
4.98
0.79
1.06
1.03
1.32
HC
11
14.23
8.56
2.59
5.37
12.90
9.44
10.26
2.36
0.48
0.57
1.25
6.79
5.35
4.29
2.44
1.37
4.00
0.63
0.94
0.83
1.44
A
16.93-
10.32
3.17
6.48
11 .74
11.50
12.34
2.83 '
0.56
0.68
1.52
7.70
6.54
5.23
2.99
1.66
4.77
0.76
1 .05
0.98
1.73
S
9.01
4.29
1.53
2.47
5.77
4.48
7.95
1.50
0.32
0.39
0.76
8.88
2.37
2.25
1.40
0.80
2.57
0.39
0.60
0.53
0.90
NOx
W
11.81
5.86
2.26
3.49
6.46
5.34
11.09
1.54
0.33
0.39
0.82
6.61
3.16
2.60
1.21
0.73
2.56
0.39
0.83
0.63
0.87
A
11.23
5.72
2.42
3.56
6.35
5.59
10,41
1.'64
0.34
0'.40
0.91
6.39
3.37
2.73
1.33
0.30
2.67
0.41
0.79
0.66
0.93
-------
TAELE 17 SUMMARY OF TOTAL EMISSIONS BY SEASON FOR THE INDIANAPOLIS STUDY AREA, 1967 (TOMS/DAY)
Area
rid KM2
2 400
3 400
1 .400
5 400
5 400
S
0.02
0.04
o,n
i
0.10
6.99
SOX
W
0.40
0.70
1.07
1.29
9.04
A
0.19
0.34
0.54
I
0.64
i
10.10
S
0.07
0.15
0.43
0.31
4.96
PART.
w '
0.20
0.42
' 0.06
0..69
. 5.30
A
0.12
0.27
0.63
0.49
6.67
S
3.05
5.81
16.03
13.21
24.50
CO
W
2.53
4.86
12.95
10.64
'21.85
A
2.95
5,74
15.35
]
12.65
23.65
S
0.43
0.83
2.30
1.91
2.58
HC
VI.
0.36
0.72
1.88
1.57
2.07
A
0.42
0.82
2.22
1.85
2.47
S
0.24
0.46
1.32
1.06
3.24
NOx
W
0.25
0.49
1.35
1.03
3.18
A
0.2
0.5
1.3
1,0'
3.9;
-------
EMISSION DENSITY
Emission densities on a grid basis were obtained by dividing
the total, emissions in each grid by the grid area. This gives
an emission density in tons of pollutant per square mile per day.
Figures 5 through 9 present the results of these calculations
for each of the five surveyed pollutants.
44
-------
_
L
_L
i
HAMILTON CO.
HENDRiCKS
t
)
1
mmmmxM
4450000
MOR<3>
\ '.'.''.'.'.''.'
ill
co.
'.-. \
4^30000
4410000
439:000
4370000
j
N
people/mi^
Q < 50
520000
540000
560000
10
580000
10
10
n 1 1 1 e s
o
i EkJ 50 - 500
fTT!] 500 - 2500
HI 2500-5000
P5! 5000 - 7500
kilometers
Figure 4. Population density for the Indianapolis study area, 1967.
-------
520
I
1
1
e
U -.
1
(
000
1
HEN
1
.
\ MOR
1
1
DONE CO.
DRICKS CO.
r *"
..
six
f. ; Xv.
.'.:'.:
'.'v.x'.''.X'.''X .':.'.'.''.'.'.':::;;)
W;'&&wXฐxฐx'xฐX'X'Xฐ3
5^ฎSS$:$|::S:'i$5J$^xซ
^^^x^Vi^^i^xSxS^ '
._
1
1
!
L
540000 560000
1C
fc^f"
10
tr , *- ^
HAMIL
vXf.v'
!yIyX'
'X- "-.''
______
JOHNSC
ijiiiiji!!jiljl|iii!jijjijij
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
roซ;coi;:.i:.;:;i:;ii;i;
i?ii^
i
j
)N CO.
1
I
f!
i
i
I
-_^^ _
I
-
L_ 1
f
^
i
HANCOCK co.
i
T
SHI
580000
0 10
miles
0 10
Jk^un
. \
kilometers
1
;LBY-CO.
i
SULFUR OXIDES,
ton/mi 2. Jay
L_j < 0.01
ฃ3 0.01 - 0.05
EHJ 0.05 -0.15
|ง 0.15 - 0.45
jj% 0.45 - 0.90
HJ 0.90 - 5.0
4430000
4410CCO
4330CCO
Figure 5. Sulfur oxide emission density from all sources in the Indianapolis study area, 1907.
-------
520
r~
i
i
(
i
i
E
HEN
"H
i
<
i
>
000
MOP
1 ,
DONE CO.
DRiCKS CO.
fi-xii-^S-:-:-:-:-:-:-.-:-:-:-:-:
.
'::
|
: '-:::
r
]
i
::>:*
::
'1
i
i
i
;-:::-:->xฃj!:
HAMIL
11
***)*!
-.-.'..
,-.'.,*.'.'.
'.'.'.''.',''
m
::::::::
i|
JOHNSC
540000 560000
10
t=>=
fe^to-;' ;S:|||;
r
j !
-1
)N CO.
1
I
-
i
r i
j (
HANCOCK CO.
I
SH!
580000
0 10
^ปt i -) ^ ?
mi les
10 0 10
t-M CZซ ' 1
^ fenf"rrvl- f^A - - 1
kilometers
1
ILBTTCO.
4.70000
PARTICIPATES,
ton/mi 2-doy
ฃ]0.01 - 0.05
00.05 - 0.10
1
00.10 - 0.25
HO. 50 - 2.00
4430000
4410000
4390000
Figure 6. Particulato emission density from all sources in tho Indianapolis study area, 1957.
-------
I
r
j
1
1
E
1
1
1
1
I,
1
HEN
1
1
) 1
/
MOF
I
1 ^
1
1
1
--,-x-x :-:-
OdNECO.- 1
-TT ../ ;;. .'....:'.
::XvXvX:x x-x-x-x-x-x .
t< ttxy?i/:*: : pry: ::::::::;
kJ rvi'^*f^'i- t, w- ; ;
I111111B
.";:;;*" I !";; 1 :; r i i ;:;;.';;;;;
:x;x;;>;^^ix-:;^xT^
Illliiiil
CJANti^b.::-^:x::ix:x:
..'. ,
.'..-..
x-x:::
:x'S:
5?
;. ' ;. ...'
f:<
:
**
.
.-.- . .
:;>:>;:;
;:;x;xi
-' Iy *.*;*;
, ;; :/... .
\l-M -::-.
Lซ '^~~^.
HI
;:;=*
m.
xx-|
: ' 1
i
ppi
:::X::;X;::
t
x:xx:x
i:;:::i:;:;$;Siii
: |i : :;
i^w-iisijii
"..:;:. :.'m
SHSxK
111
111
111
xx.xx:x|
***m~<^n
:x::->Sx-:j
, -1-
mm i
H t
[;:i|;|illlli|:||i
::::;:i:i::x::;:;x;x;: HANCOCK CO.
i.-:;::x:x:::x:x::::::::-:-:-:-x-: ::::::
;::;:;:;i^ j
,-:':::::^.
520000 540000 550000
10
^^lllliiiifilllitl
i||||S|!]
K-;::::i
|||||
;;;;!;;!!;;:i;yi;;;;!;;;;;;i;;!;;;;;;;i;
llllllll
|Sj;Sjs$fi[i
L.
530000
_
0
miles
:-X;.-:;:-X;X;X;X;X;X_X;X;xซ
Ilil^illl
4J7UU1-U
J
Ak
'T)
r
CARBON MONOXIDE.
ton/mi^-doy
.
< 0.07
' r^-,
{Tj 0.07 - 0.20
_
^j 0.20 - 0.80
0.80 - 3.20
10
=j _
M 3.20 - 9.60
10 0 10
t C-I ซ!. 1 1
kilometers
9.60 - 20.00
Figure 7. Carbon monoxide emission density from all sources in the Indianapolis study area, 1967.
-------
1
~ r~" i f r- ........:...::'V.:.j .:! , 4450000
i
i
i
i
I
i
1
HEN
vX'X'x-'X'X'- ' X;X-X-;- '>;-
:-::x-x-x::-x^::.:x:.:::::::-:x ': :.
1
|
I ง1 ililiil -
!:XfiA:MiLTON CO.
i|iii:i;;l;;||;i;i:g;||gi;:;iiS;:;i|| 1
IlipH
1 H
iiijjpilijlJjijSIiBiffi
WKiim J
:.:-:-x-:-:-:-:-x-:-:-x-:-:-:-:-:-x.-:-:|x-::::.:.:.: :.-- ''' : ;":""" ::':"-"'j ; ...;......-... . /--rrrrr .-. 1 ; ^4T"CP
Illllll i|| || | ' yjjjjjjjjj
PRICKS CQ.-; xxHAMCOCK CO.
^X;X;X-Xx-;Xy. . ;.;.;. ;.;.;::-!: X^-";-:--- ,' .*'*v'r. .-. : '- v:-^-:-^:iS^ii;S^-;-X'x'X-t'X-XvXv X'X'X'X-X-
1
1 1
L
\
/
1
*
MOR
-- -|
'1
1
I
1
m^m^f^'::'-' ['''. -^'': ' ' ""^ ' ": ^^^ ; j i ill I!; j i 3 : xx-ixxxxxx^x : isHji!;:!:;;;!
J
S:X;X::::;Xx:;:-x;:;X:X;X;:;i':: iox ; : . : ;. :. . .:.!. -Ks: :::::::):::::::::: :j.;.:x::.::;:;::':::x;::::x-XXxX::x::X:
ix;:x;x;x;::x;:;f::X::.::.:::x:X;:::;X;:vX;.v.::| ' Z29^'-C
IVl^iiiil-i-iyl'X'l'X-'.'XvX'X'!'!
SA&>e&x;:::i:v::x:i:;:x:x'::::
iliii ;:; ; ' ;i-' 9i-
'.'.'.'. -I'X-X'i'i-X'i'X-x-.-'-i-i-x^'i'X'X-i'i'X-i-.-x- ;-;-i'!-x-!-.->x-!-x ! ^ >'>! -i-i-x-x- ! x '";-'"
i iiiiii illiiliii iliilfiilllflll
:-:-:-i:x-:-X':-:-:-:-:-x-:-X'X-:-:^-xt-:-:vX-:-:-:.:':v:|':-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:->jX-:-X':-:':-:-:':-X':-:----v.->x-:- 1
i^x^x^ S:;:s;:;;;;;:;;;:;;;;}X ;:;:;;:;;;:;:;:;:;;;;;:;:;: ;::;;;Si
-1 - ' > 4370000
J
x>:x | /f
1
; i i i |;i ;
|| | HYnpnrApRn^ N
ton/mi2-day
520000 540000 560000 ggoooo :LJ U'U'
E3 0-01 - 0.05
OJ 0.05 - 0.20
'ฃ_. 9 'ฐ HI 0.20 - o.s:
rrn*es tmป
1P_ ฐ 1ฐ p:? 0.50 - 1.00
kilometers pw
ฃj i.oo - 2.0:
-
ซ Figure 8. Hydrocarbon emission density from all sources surveyed in the Indianapolis ?tjdv ar=-. '-37.
-------
... -
ซ
r
ป
1 ~"
1
,
I
1
1
1
!,
.
-
JOONE CO.
x
i
lillill
:::::x::::::;x:x;Xx:-:X:;:'-;::x
i
4 -
T
^ 1
i
MOR
1
1
!
:x:x:;XxX:.:.:.:.:.x-:.Xx;-:-:
l|Sili|;llli|:i;
:H: :x::::x:x:x:x:;:;:x:!::';:
.I'l'l-;'' ^^ '_ i
>:::>:::.-:" f . ~V--x-- ::.- :-: .
:xix::'- >:-'':...- .-;"' i.
jji^^f^jj^
"
f
1
1
1
1
!
111
1
?
t;x- i
.-.;. .-.'
':.-
1
.>x :
,-...:
:-,-
tr : : :
V
;: ;; -.->
fx : ix x
I ;;;;;
1 11
:::: :::: -:;
IyS ::;:x
:::: :: :
520000 540000 560000
10
t^
nor act.
10
ts^A?
: !'.-! ':!' :
HAMIL
TON;COX:
|X:-x-:-:-:-:-:-:-:::
li
flil||||||.ifi
. "." 'r~":ri:r: :::::: ::::
.-..;:-.-.-.*^v-;<
;.:;:-:;:v:;X:X;:;
::::::::: :::::
:'-'.'^^งj:j:x':|^
::|:;X;:;:: :: '::.
... ::'.: .-X\'^'XvX ^* -X*
.XXvv-:'::x :-::;- ; :!:::: i : : : -1
m
iilllll
:x:x:x:::x. ;:x :-: x -x-. . }
gjigSS x;;;xxx;xxxx;
:::-:X;-:-:-:-:- :-:-;-::-:vX:x;::/::
:;i^ci-fMsoM ca^H
iSS^iS:: ^ixx^Sx:::::^
I
^4 1 4450000 "
x-x-x x>xi
xj
xxxx;xx:|
r " i ' "i
1 f
':ix;;x;x:x;x;;;;x;:x;;x'x::x::;:xx;:;:::! i
ix.xxxxxxxxx <<', i
SX-XHANCCC< co.
?:.xxxx:xx;xxxxx;xxx:x, j |
-., x. .-.... .;;';-;-;;'-;; '.'.'.'.-'.-'.-'.'.'. '.* \
ง;:::::::::;.:: :::::::. i
:-;:::::::::. . -....-.. j \
-..-.'. . ..'.'.'. '. - xx ...
mm-^:
x;xxxxx:x:x-:xxx:x::, --"- - ซ9ซW
illlllil
'.-*. ','.'. ...'..'..x .'.,.',..'..
:;:':
S-xviiiiSi
1
580000
0
0 10
ta'~ 't-'l 1
kilomettirs
X':x;x>;x:x . x:
.LSTTt!i;x;x;xix;x
::.::::::::::: .-..-.- -.-.: 4370000
/
! ^
NITROGEN OXIDES, N
ton/mi ^-doy
[^| 0.01 - 0.05
1^3 0.05 - 0.10
10 | 0.10 - 0.25
ฃ3 0.25 - 0.50
ฃ3J 0.50 - 3.00
Figure 9. Nitrogen oxide emission density from all sources in the Indianapolis study ?.'3a, 195 ~-
-------
REFERENCES
1. Ozolins, G. an(TSmith, R., Rapid Survey Technique for Estimating
Community Air Pollution Emissions, Department of Health, Education,
and Welfare, Public Health Service, October 1966.
2. Duprey, R. L., Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors,
Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health
Service, April 1967.
3. Personal contact with local coal dealers and suppliers,
October 1968.
4. Burner Fuel Oils, Mineral Industry Surveys, United States
Department of the Interior, Bureau of Mines, 1965.
5. Personal contact with the Indianapolis Bureau .of Air Pollution
Control, October, 1968.
6. Census of Housing, United States Department of Commerce, Bureau
of the Census, 1960.
7. Air Traffic Activity for 1967, Department of Transportation,
Federal Aviation Administration.
8. Personal contact with NCUIH, United States Department of Health,
Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, August 1968.
. 51- . . . . ' .-
-------
9. Indianapolis Regional. Transportation and Development Study,
1966.
10. Retail Trade Special Report, Census of .-Business, United States
ปs
Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, 1963.
11. Highway Statistics~ United States Department of Transportation,
Federal Highway Administration, Bureau of Public Roads,
1965.
r 0
-------
_
STATE BOARD OF HEALTH
INDIANAPOLIS
Address Reply to:
Indiana Slate Board of llcuitu
1330 West Michigan Street
Indianapolis, Indlaiia 46207
November k, 1968
Mr. Clyde B. Morita, Sr^Asst. San. Engr.
National Air Pollution Control
Administration
NIAPEC Section
Ull West Chapel Hill Street
Durham, North Carolina 27701
Dear Mr. Morita:
Attached is information for the proposed Indianapolis Region,
including Marion County and the seven contiguous counties . This
material includes: .
1. One sheet of notes on Shelby County with process information
on Pittsburgh Plate Glass Compar? y .
2. Comprehensive data, provided by Mr. Leo M. Lototzky, of
Pickands Mather & Company, on coal usage in the eight counties being
studied. This is categorized as Commercial and Retail, Industrial, and
Utilities, including data on ash and. sulfur content.
3. Comprehensive data, provided by Mr. John E. Cockley, of
Indiana Gas Company, Inc., on gas usage in the six contiguous counties
that they service. This is categorized as Commercial arid Retail, and
Industrial. It includes typical winter and summer usage to enable you
to form an opinion on needs for space heating requirements . Hancock
County gas usage for 1967 was 1,578,000,000 cubic feet, according to the
Greenfield Gas- Company, Inc.
We were unable to obtain any information on fuel, oil usage for this .
proposed region through the Indiana Petroleum Council, since only a portion
of the fuel oil distribution is handled by members of the Council. The
information you -have from the Oil Fuel Institute of Central Indiana will
have to suffice.
We trust that these data will enable you to complete, the survey.
If we can be. of further assistance,, please contact us.
Very truly yours ,
.MLOlson/fht
Ends.
Harry D,VWilliams, Director
Air Pollution Control Division
/n
-------
-:-ซ*>
t^c^\^_ZL_/gl?
m.-j.-j~..;rฃ.,;
i^,-^j.u;'.--ii^=ฃ.,; .-uw-ii^i; -*-.*!, v._ijrr-*^ปปiw .-. u^. u-:^.
a
,.vru^-->i^.'.-.
J
^...^/)k'! x./>; /*
/ /
^S^3J7
i
! I
m.
t
!!
?>!?
<-
6 A
y. 6
//i>.-//uj
"/ ///j y-
. X -&
f
-r /
^.^.
------- |