FINAL REPORT
CONTROL STRATEGIES FOR
SET II POLLUTANTS
KANSAS CITY IAQCR
AND
S. CENTRAL KANSAS AQCR
-------
PEDCo - ENVI RO N M ENTAL
SUITE e . ATKINSON SQUARE
CINCINNATI. OHIO 45246
513/771-4330
FINAL REPORT
CONTROL STRATEGIES FOR
SET II POLLUTANTS
KANSAS CITY IAQCR
AND
S. CENTRAL KANSAS AQCR
Prepared For
The Environmental Protection Agency
Durnam, North Carolina 27701
Authorization:
Contract No. 68-02-0044
Task Order No.4
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page Number
SUMMARY
. . . .
. . .
. . . . . .
. . . .
. . . .
1
EMISSIONS DATA
. . . .
. . . .
. . . . .
. . . .
5
GROWTH DATA
. . . .
. . .
. . . .
. . .
. . . . .
6
POST-1970 EMISSION CONTROLS
. . . . . .
. . . . .
8
ADJUSTMENT OF APPENDIX I CURVES TO .
REFLECT LOCAL AUTOMOTIVE GROWTH RATE.
. . . . .
10
Appendix 1 - Summary of provisions of Proposed Amendments
to Kansas Air Pollution Control Regulations
(July 1971).
Appendix 2 - Calculations for Control Strategy 3
Appendix 3 - Methodology for Calculation of Emissions
Required to Meet The Federal Air Quality
Standards
Appendix 4 - Calculations for Control Strategies 1 and 2
-------
S UMJYlARY
Strategies for Set II pollutants were run for the
South Central Kansas AQCR and the Kansas City Interstate
AQCR.
The Summary Tables are. included herein (Tables 1
and 2).
The "Additional Controls" used in the strategy
consisted of the Proposed Kansas Regulations (summarized
in Appendix 1) only.
Missouri does not propose emission
standards for Set II pollutants.
Thus no "Additional
Controls" were put on the Missouri Portion of the KCIAQCR.
In short, the strategies used to compile the Summary Tables
are as follows:
KANSAS CITY IAQCR
Strategy 1
Kansas and Missouri-Federal Motor Vehicle
Standard only
Strategy 2
Missouri-Federal Motor Vehicle Standard
only
Kansas-Federal Motor Vehicle Standard and
proposed Kansas regulations
SOUTH CENTRAL AQCR
Strategy 1
Federal Motor Vehicle Standard only
Strategy 2
Federal Motor Vehicle Standard and
proposed Kansas regulations
As the Summary Tables show, both regions will meet the
Federal Arnbient Air Quality Standards by 1975 under
- 1 -
-------
Strategy 1 with the exception of carbon monoxide in the
KCIAQCR.
Even under Strategy 2, the standard will not be
met in that region.
A third strategy was used which imposed a 90% reduction
on process sources in Missouri.
While that approach reduced
1975 emissions by 7.7 tons per year, it is not significant
in the overall picture.
The resultant overall reduction
is 33% which is very close to the 1975 reduction using
Strategy 2.
The calculations for Strategy 3 are attached
(Appendix 2).
The methodology used in calculating the emissions
required to meet the Federal Ambient Air Quality Standards
is
attached (Appendix 3).
The calculations for Strategies 1 and 2 are attached
(Appendix 4) and the rational for determining control rates,
growth rates and the motor vehicle emission rates, all of
which are used in the calculations, are in the body of this
report.
In general, the Federal Air Quality Standards will be met
in both regions by 1975 without the imposition of controls on
stationary sources.
The Kansas City AQCR will not meet the
carbon monoxide standard until sometime in 1976, with or with-
out controls on stationary sources, and therefore it will be
necessary to seek a two-year extension under Sec. 51.30 of
EPA's regulations, (36 FR 22405).
- 2 -
-------
TABLE -
SUMMARY OF CONTROL STRATEGY ANALYSIS
S. CENTRAL (WICHITA) AIR QUALITY CONTROL REGION
COa
Air I
Quali ty 1
Standard'
}Jg/m3
EX1.st1.ng i
Measured. j
Concentrat1.on,
}Jg/m3 I
5 .'1 b
40, 1 Hr
1 0, 8 Hr.
Oxidants 160
190c
NO
x
w
100
99d
Existing:
Emissions!
I
Emissions! Emissions After
Required j Application of
to Achieve i Federal Motor
Standards: Vehicle Program
I 1975 1977
1188, 000. 138,000
280,400
-
71,300e
59,900
48,500
40,700
75,300
74,600
67,900
-
-
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
Concentration in mg/m3 .
Second highest 8 hr. average
Second highest 1 hr. average; highest 1 hr.
Annual arithmetic mean (NASN data from 7-70
Hydrocarbons
3
average = 210 }Jg/m
to 7-71)
Emissions After Applicatic
of Any Additional
Control Measures
1975
1977
188,000
138,000
42,700
37,800
73,000
67,100
-------
I
~
I
TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF CONTROL STRATEGY ANALYSIS
KANSAS CITY AIR QUALITY CONTROL REGION
Air I EXlsnng I Existing I Emissions ! Emissions After I Emissions After App1ica
i ! i : Application of
Quality , Measured Emissions i Required of Any Additional
i . i
Standard I Concentra tlon; I to Achieve ! Federal Motor Control Measures
~g/m3 ~g/m3 I I I
Standards j Vehicle Program
I 1975 1977 1975 1977
COa 40, 1 Hr 16.6- i::I.,C 689,200 414,QOO I 475,000 344,000 475-,000
10, 8 Hr I 344,000
_..._~
168d f I
Oxidants 160 186,400 181,000 142,000 127,000 136,000 121,000
NO 100 57 e 306,400 - 3~6~000 349,000 346,000 346,000
x
tic.
a)
. .. / 3
Concentratlon ln mg m
b)
Based on 8.hr. value
c)
Second highest 8 hr. average same as highest 8 hr. average
Second highest 1 hr. average; highest 1 hr. average = 200 ~g/m3
d)
e)
f)
Annual arithmetic mean (NASN data from 7-70 to 7-71)
Hydrocarbons
-------
EMISSIONS DATA
S. Central AQCR
The emission data on which the strategies are based
were obtained from the Kansas Statewide Inventory (a) and
represent
emissions for the base year 1970.
Kansas City IAQCR
The emission data on which the strategies are based
were obtained from Appehdix D(b) and represent emissions
for the base year 1970.
(a)
Statewide Inventory for Air Pollution Emissions,
State of Kansas, 1970, Final Report. .
PEDCo Environmental Specialists Inc. Cincinnati,
Ohio. December 31, 1971.
(b)
Compilation of Appendix D
Quality Control Region ,
Environmental Specialists
December 27, 1971.
for Kansas City Air
Final Report. PEDCo
Inc. Cincinnati, Ohio.
-5-
-------
GROWTH DATA
General
Emissions for each AQCR were separated into 'basic
categories.
It was determined that each category will
increase its uncontrolled emissions in direct proportion to
some single demographic factor.
This relationship is as
follows:
Category
Demographic Factor
Industrial & Commercial
Power Plants
Process Losses
Solid Waste Disposal
Gasoline Handling
Solvent Emissions
Agricultural Burning
Fuel
Manufacturing employees
Generating Capacity
Manufacturing employees
population
Manufacturing
Manufacturing
population
employees
employees
Emissions not falling into one of the above categories
were listed as miscellaneous and were assigned a ,growth rate'
\
of zero.
These sources are vessels, railroads, ~nd residential
fuel burning.
Table 12.
Demographic
Factor
Mfg. employees
GROWTH RATES FOR S. CENTRAL AQCR
Growth Rate
% per yr.
0.56
Generating Capacity
6.00
Source
Wichita-Sedgwick Co.
Metro. Plan. Dept., p.13
Wichita-Sedgwick Co.
Metro. Plan. Dept., P.13
Private communication
with Jack E. Alumbaugh,
Industrial Development
Office, City of Wichita
Population
1.20
-6-
-------
Table ;1..3.
GROWTH RATES FOR KANSAS CITY AQCR
Demographic
Factor
Mfg. employees
Population
Generating capacity
Growth Rate
% per year
2.60
3.00
8.00
Source
Metro. Bul. #3, p.17
Metro. Bul. #3, p. 9
Private communication
with Mr. Terney, Kansas
City Board of Public
Utilities, Kansas City,
Kansas, October 1971
-7-
-------
POST-1970 EMISSION CONTROLS
General
Both Kansas and Missouri forbid open burning under their
present regulations.
Missouri does not anticipate the
adoption of any other regulations (Post-1970) directly' affecting
Set II pollutants.
Kansas has regulations specifically
limiting CO, HC, and NO emissions pending.
x
These are
referred to as Post-1970 Controls.
It is estimated that the
new regulations would ~educe emissions as follows:
Reduction, %
CO HC NO
x
o 0 0
o 0 5
90 70 0
o 0 0
o 0 0
. .
o 0 '0
Source
Indus. & Comm..fue1 burn.
Power plants
Process losses
Solid Waste incin.
Gasoline handling
Solvents
A summary of the proposed regulations is attached
(Appendix 1 ) .
Regulation 28-19-23 controls HC emissions from fuel tanks
greater than 40,000 gal. capacity.
It is estimated that 75%
are presently uncontrolled (Kansas Statewide Inventory, Sec. 3.3.7).
Thus the regulation would reduce emissions by approximately 70%
-8-
-------
(.90 X .75).
The balance of the regulation controls vapor
blowdown and ethylene waste gas streams.
These are not
significant sources in the two regions.
It was therefore
determined that an overall process emissions (including gasoline
storage) reduction of 70% would be attributable to the
regulation.
Regulation 28-19-24 controls CO emissions from foundries
and refineries.
Afterburners will reduce emissions by 90%.
The only other major CO emitting process is carbon black
production.
Overall, a 90% reduction in process emissions is
warranted since there are no carbon black plants in either
region.
Regulation 28-19-25 limits emissions from nitric acid
plants.
There are no nitric acid plants in either region
therefore process NO
x
emissions are not reduced.
Regulation 28-19-31 limits NO
x
emissions from indirect
heating units.
However the upper limit is as high as un-
controlled emission rates under proper firing conditions and
little impact is seen from the regulation.
Impact is estimated
to be 5% reduction.
-9-
-------
ADJUSTMENT OF APPENDIX I CURVES
TO REFLECT LOCAL AUTOMOTIVE GROWTH RATE
General
Figures 1 through 3, Appendix I, 36 FR 15500, are based
on a national average traffic growth rate of 5% per year.
The
growth rates for Wichita and Kansas City metropolitan areas are
3.1%a and 3.8%b respectively. The Appendix I curves can be
adjusted to reflect this difference in growth rate by multiplying
the plotted values by the ratios of the actual growth to the
assumed (5%) growth.
~hus, using 1967 as the base year, the
plotted value for 1975 for Wichita should be multiplied by
the fraction i + (8 X 0.031)
+ (8 X 0.050) .
The recalculated emission rates for each region is as
follows:
Table 14. RECALCULATED VALUES FOR AUTOMOTIVE EMISSION RATES
ANNUAL POLLUTANT
AQCR YEAR GROWTH RATE
% HC CO NO
x
S. CENTRAL 1970 3.1 0.85 0.92 1. 09
(WICHITA) 1975 3.1 0.49 0.63 0.96
1977 3.1 0.35 0.44 0.72
1970 3.8 0.88 0.95 1.12
KANSAS CITY 1975 3.8 0.51 0.65 1.01
1977 3.8 0.37 0.46 0.76
These. adjusted values are shown on Figures 1 through 3.
a)
Correspondence from E.P. Landman, State Highway Commission
of Kansas, dated September 20, 1971.
Correspondence from R.P. Turner, U.S. Department of Transportation,
dated October 8, 1971.
b)
-10-
-------
1915 1911
YEAR
Figure 2. Carbon monoxide emJsslon rates from urban vehicles In United States.
projected from 1967 base of 1.
1.0
...
t-
""
0:
~ 0.6
::E
...
c
...
~ 0.4
i
o
III
1.0
uJ
t-
""
0:
~ 0.6
EE
...
c
...
:! 0.4
""
~
c
;II
o
ml
1.2
~ 0.8
~
%
~
~ 0.6
~
...
~
~ 0.4
0.1
ADJUSTED NORMALIZED EMISSION RATES FOR
S. CENTRAL AND KANSAS CITY AQCR's
o
m7
)
m5 1911
YEAR
m~
1710
Figure 1. Hydrocarbon emission rates from urban vehicles In United States.
projected from 1967 base of 1. .
mo
1380
o
1961
1970
Figure 3. Nitrogen oxides emission rates from urban vehicles in United States.
projected from 1967 base 011.
-11,-
U8S
1985
A - I
-------
APPENDIX 1
SUMMAR Y OF PROVISHONS OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO .
KANSAS AIR POLLUTION CONTROL REGULATIONS (July 1971)
28-19-1 (Amendment): Intended!fo define intent of Ambient Air Quality Standards.
New definition is consistent with intended application of such standards by the
federal government.
28-19-2 (Amendment): Revises ~lefinition of Total Suspended Particulate and
Sulfur DioxIde and defines additiqnal pollutants.'
28-19-3 (Amendment): Changes I~xisting ambient air quality standard for sulfur
dlOxide and establishes new state standards for carbon monoxide, photo-chemical
oxidants, hydrocarbons, and nitrogen dioxide. All proposed standards are the
same as nationally applicable fecteral "secondary" standards which have been
promulgated to protect the public welfare from any known or anticipated adverse
effects associated with air polluti~on.
28-19-4 (Amendment): Makes ali~ standards applicable throughout the state.
28-19-6 (Amendment): Revises policy statement regarding emission regulations
to encourage application of best ~~o~trol procedures available at any time.
28-19-7 (Amendment): Redefine~3 "alteration" of emission sources to include
operatlonal changes, as well as physical changes, to equipment which may
substantially increase the amoun~ of emissions.
28-19-8 (Amendment): Lowers l,~vel of S02 and/or 803 and indirect heating
capacIty that must be reported and expands list of pollutants which must be
reported to include oxides of nitI1.ogen, carbon monoxide, and hydrocarbons.
28-19-11 (Amendment): Provides for temporary excessive emissions which
result from malfunctioning of prpcessing equipment, as well as control equipment.
28-19-12 (Amendment): Requires that stack testing be conducted in accordance
wIth federally approved proceduI'les and provides that regular, fixed monitoring
may be required for certain SOUI'lces. This latter provision is required t6 comply
with federal law.
28-19-15 (New): Exempts certaip new stationary sources from state control which
WIll be dTrectly subject to federa! control.
. . ,
28-19-22 (New): Establishes liIYi~its on sulfur compound emissions from: (1) sulfuric
acid plants, (~) non-ferrous sme~ters, and (3) combustion of process gases (other
than for indirect heating, secondary product recovery and control of odors from
low BTU streams). .
28-19-23 (New): Establishes cortrol requirements concerning sources of
hydrocarbon emission including: (1) gasoline and petroleum distillate storage
tanks, (2) ethylene production, or utilization, plants, and (3) storage and
processing operations which emit more than 50 pounds of hydrocarbons per day.
28-19-24 (New): Establishes cor;.trol requirements for carbon monoxide emissions
from foundries and refineries. . .
(over)
-------
APPENDIX 1 (continued)
28-19-25 (New): Establishes limits on emissions of oxides of nitrogen from
nitric acid plants.
28-19-30 (Amendment): Requires that emissions from indirect heating equipment
be tested in accordance with federally approved procedures.
28-19-31 (Amendment): Establishes limits on sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide
emissions from indirect heating units. The sulfur dioxide restrictions become
applicable to systems placed in operation after January 1, 1972, and the nitrogen
oxide limits become applicable to units placed under purchase contract after
January 1, 1972.
28-19-42 (Amendment): Requires that incinerators be tested in accordance with
federally approved procedures.
. 28-19-55, 28-19-56, 28-19-57, 28-19-58 (New): Provide for an emergency episode
Plan, as requlred by federal law. Vanous "action" levels are established and the
development of emergency pollution curtailment plans, by major pollution sources,
is required.
-------
APPENDIX 2 - STRATEGY 3
RESULTS OF FED. MOT. VEH. CONTROL
PROGRAM FOR CARBON MONOXIDE POLLUTANT
KANSAS CITY AQCR (KAN. & MO.)
WITH POST-1970 CONTROLS IN KANSAS AND MISSOURI
SOURCE CATEGORY
! ~
!Indus. and Comm. Fuel 100 118 1.3 1.5 I 1.5 I
I I
Ipower Plants 100 140 156 5.3 7.4 i 8.3 I
I
I ! I
10 113 118 I 8.7 0.9 0.9 I
Process Losses I
ISOlid Waste Disposal I
100 115 121 0.9 1.0 i 1.1
i
,
jOther - Open Burning 0 0 0 I 14.4 O ! 0
! I
Misc. 100 100 100 17.5 17.5 i 17.5
(a) Percent of emissions
after enforcement of
post-1970 regulations
(b) Percent of 1970 emissions
(c) Sum of Tables 4-17 & 4-20
I
TOT ALS --;.
48.1
I
28.3 I 29.3
I
197N Total
1970 Total
"
/
I
o . 58 to. 6071
GF75 GF77
FROM APPENDIX I CURVE
2
FROM EMISS. INVENTORY:
Motor Veh. Emiss
F70 = Total Emiss
E75 = 0.65
E77 = 0.46
E70 = 0.95
643,100 -
= 691,200 - 0.930
E75
E70
0.65
( F 7 0 ) + (1- F 7 O) (GF 7 5) = O. 9 5 (0. 9 3 0 ) + ( 1- 0 . 93 0 ) O. 5 8 7
=
0.636 + 0.041 = 0.67
E77
E70
0.46
(F 70) + (1- F 70) (GF 77) = O. 95 ( 0 . 930) + (1- 0 . 930) O. 607
= 0.450 + 0.042 = 0.49
-------
APPENDIX 3
METHODOLOGY FOR CALCULATION OF EMISSIONS REQUIRED
TO MEET THE FEDERAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
Emission reductions required to meet the Federal Air
Quality Standards were calculated using the proportional
model (36 FR 15490) for NO and CO while the 0
x x
standard
is met based upon HC reductions as set forth in Appendix J
(36 FR 15502) .
The values used for existing air quality
were as follows:
Pollutant Reading
NO Annual arithmetic mean
x
CO Second highest 8 hr. average
o Second highest 1 hr. average
x
The rationale for using the second highest reading for
CO and 0 is that the Air Quality Standards for these
x
pollutants is based on maximum concentration not to be
exceeded more than once per year.
Thus the Air Quality
Standard is based on the second highest reading and
strategies must be calculated accordingly.
The r~quired percentage reduction for NOx and CO was
first calculated by the equation:
A - C
A - B
x 100
where:
A = Existing air quality at the locating having
the highest (NOx) or second highest (CO and
o ) measured concentration in the Region.
x .
-------
B = Background concentration (assumed to be zero
for all Set II pollutants)
C = National Standard
Oxidant strategies were based on the reduction of
hydrocarbons per Fig. 1, Appendix J (36 FR 15502)(Attached Figure
3-1) .
Emissions required to achieve the Air Quality Standards
were then calculated by multiplying the existing emissions
times one minus the percentage reduction required.
Table 3-1 summarizes the reduction calculations.
TABLE 3-1.
SUMMARY OF REDUCTION CALCULATIONS FOR
SET II POLLUTANTS FOR S. CENTRAL KANSAS
AND KANSAS CITY AQCR'S
S. Cen. Kan. AQCR Kansas City AQCR
NO CO 0 NO CO 0
x x x x
Existing air quality 99 5.1 190 57 16.6 168
National standard 100 10 160 100 10 160
Percent reduction to
meet AQS - - 16b - 39.8 3b
Existing emission, 75.3 280.4 71.3Cj306.4 689.2 186.4
1000 TPY
Emission required to I 59.9 414 181
meet AQS, 1000 TPY a I a a
j
(a)
(b)
(c)
Existing emissions are less than the required amount
See Figure 3-1
Hydrocarbon emissions
-------
ApPENDIX J
c
a:
""
c
'"
;
-'
~
~
""
:; 80
:>-
~IJ
O:u
u~
""~
~~
~ ~ 60
!:!:;(
::>0
0-,
~~
'f:;i
~5 40
~o
"'~
"'0
sf
"'a:
~~ 20
~ 1(,
Q
>-
0:
;!; 30
110
100
0.10
1. haUl PHOTOCHEMICAL OXIDANT CONCENTRATION, pp",
0.15 0.20 0.25
200
250 JOO 310 400 410 Soo
S~co,..O Hl(;tiB~l.. hour PHOTOCHEMICAL OXIDANT CONCENTR/lTION.p./",3
SSO
600
'"
o
;:.
'-'
::>
Q
...
a:
Figure 1. Required hydrocarbon emission control as a function of photochemical oxidan.t concen-
tration. (Reference: Air Quality Criteria for Nitrogen Oxides, AP-S4, Environmental Protection
Agency; Washington, D.C., January 1971.) .'
Figure 3-1 - Appendix J Method for Determining
Hydrocarbon Emission Reductions
-------
APPENDIX 4
Control Strategy Calculations
for
Set II Pollutants
for
South Central Kansas AQCR
and
Kansas City IAQCR
Strategies 1 and 2
-------
TABLE' 4--1
RESULTS OF FED. MOT. VEH. CONTROL
PROGRAM FOR HYDROCARBONS
S. CENTRAL KAN. (WICHITA) AQCR
WITHOUT POST-1970 CONTROLS
Contro' Growth ff
SOURCE CATEGORY actor ---. --- .
a 197 1 I
100 103 104
!
'Indus. and Corom. Fuel
I
I
Ipower Plants
!process Losses
I
Isolid \'laste Disposal (Incin
I
:Other - Open Burning
I
Gasoline Handling
Solvents
Misc.
(a) Percent of emissions
after enforcement of
post-1970 regulations
(b) Percent of 1970 emissions
FROM APPENDIX I CURVE
E75=0.49
E77=0.35
E70=0.85
100
130
142
o
2.0
1.4
5.3
0.6
4.2
3.1
4.6
4.7
25.9
"
/
- 45,400 = 0.64
- 71,300
1975
2.1
1.8
5.4
0.6
o
3.2
4.7
4.7
22.5
0.868
GF75
FROM EMISS. INVENTORY:
Motor Veh. Emiss
F70 = Total Emiss
L.
1090 TPY I
I 1977 I
I
2.1 I
2.0 I
5.5 I
i
o . 7 I
I
I
I
3.2 I
4.8 I
I
4. 7 i
i
I
i
;
o
i
o . 8 551
GF77
100
103
104
E75
E70
00..4895 (0.64) + (1-0.64) 0.868
( F 7 0 ) + (1- F 70) (GF 7 5) =
E77
E70
100
106
108
o
o
100
103
104
100
103
104
100
100
100
TOTALS --1-
197N Total
1970 Total
1
= 0.369 + 0.312 = 0.68
0.35
(F 70) + (1- F 70) (GF 77) = 0 . 85
(0.64) + (1-0.64) 0.855
=
0.264 + 0.308 = 0.57
-------
TABLE 4-2
RESULTS OF FED. MOT. VEH. CONTROL
PROGRAM FOR CARBON MONOXIDE
S. CENTRAL KAN.. (WICHITA) AQCR
WITHOUT POST-1970 CONTROLS
SOURCE CATEGORY Emissions 1000 TPY
1971:) I 1977
,
iIndus. and Comm. Fuel 100 103 104 0.5 0.5 9.5
!
,
ipower Plants 100 130 142 0 0 0
I
I
Iprocess Losses 100 103 104 1.1 1.1 1.1
ISOlid Waste Disposal (Incin. )100 106 108 2.1 2.2 2.3
;Other - Open Burning I. 0 0 0 11.9 0 0
I
Agricultural Burn. 50 106 108 1.5 0.8 0.8
Misc. 100 100 100 13.8 13.8 13.8
~
(a) Percent of emissions
after enforcement of
post-1970 regulations
(b) Percent of 1970 emissions
TOTALS --} 30.9 18.4 18.5
0.596 I I
197N Total \ 0.5981
1970 Total -:
GF75 GF77
FROM APPENDIX I CURVE
2
FROM EMISS. INVENTORY:
Motor Veh. Emiss
F70 = Total Emiss
E75 =
E77 =
0.63
0.44
E70 =
0.92
249,500
= 280,400 = 0.89
E75
E70
( F 7 0 ) + (1- F 70) (GF 7 5) =
~:~~ (0.89) + (1-0.89) 0.596
=
0.608 + 0.066 = 0.67
E77
E70
0.44 (0 )
(F70) + ('1-F70) (GF77) = 0.92 .89 + (1-0.89) 0.598
=
0.425 + 0.066 = 0.49
-------
TABLE 4-- 3
RESULTS OF FED. MOT. VEH. CONTROL
PROGR~1 FOR NITORGEN OXIDES
S. CENTRAL KAN. (WICHITA) AQCR
~VITHOUT POST-1970 CONTROLS
SOURCE CATEGORY
, I I
,
!Indus. and Comm. Fuel 100 1104 10.0 10.3 I 10.4 I
i I I
, i I
!Power Plants 100 130 1142 14.0 18.2 I 19.9
Iprocess Losses I !
I I
100 103 104 9.1 9.4 I 9.5 I
I
ISOlid Waste Dlsposal(Incin.)100 ' I
106 108 0.6 0.6 ! 0.7 I
I !
;Other - Open Burning 0 0 0 0.9 0 0
!
Misc. 100 100 100 1.9 1.9 1.9
(a) Percent of emissions
af~er enforcement of
post-1970 regulations
(b) Percent of 1970 emissions
TOTALS --f.
36.5
40.4
42.4
197N Total
1970 Total
\.
/
I
. 1 .11 I 1.16 i
GF75 GF77
FROM APPENDIX I CURVE
3 :
FROM EMISS. INVENTORY:
Motor Veh. Emiss
F70 = Total Emiss
E75 =
E77 =
0.96
0.72
E70 =
1. 09
=
38,800
75,300
= O. 52
E75
E70
0.96 )
( F 7 0 ) + (1- F 70) (GF 7 5) = 1 . 0 9 (0 . 5 2 + ( 1- 0 . 5 2 ) 1. 11
= 0.456 + 0.532 = 0.99
E77
E70
0.72
(F70) + C1-F70) (GF77) = 1.09 (0.52) + (1-0.52) 1.16
= 0.342 + 0.556 = 0.90
-------
--. - -- --. ..
TABLE 4-4
RESULTS OF FED. MOT. VEH. CONTROL
PROG~~ FOR HYDROCARBONS
S. CENTRAL KAN. (WICHITA) AQCR
WI~ri P0b~-l97v (PKu~08~u)CUNTROLS
~
1000 TPY I
SOURCE CATEGORY I
,
I i
19711 ; 1q77
.
I 100 I i
i Indus. ana. Comm. Fuel 103 104 I 2.1 ' ,2.1
,
I '
, '
ipower Plants 100 130 ~142 1.4 1.8 i 2.0
I i
I Losses 30 103 104 I 5.3 1.6 I 1.7 I'
jprocess I
I ' I
!SOlid '
Waste Disposal (Incin '1) 100 106 108 0.6 0.6 ! 0.7
I
;
;Other - Open Burning 0 0 0 4.2 0 0
I
Gasoline Handling 100 103 104 3.1 3.2 3.2
Solvents 100 1103 104 4.6 4.7 4.8
Misc. 100 100 100 I 4.7 4.7 4.7
I
I
(a) Percent of emissions TOTALS ~ 25.9 18.7 19.2
after enforcement of
post-1970 regulations I
197N Total I
\. L~. 722' 0 . 74 Q "
(b) Percent of 1970 emissions 1970 Total ~ I
GF75 GF77
FROM APPENDIX I CURVE
1
FROM EMISS. INVENTORY':
Motor Veh. Emiss
F70 = To~al Emiss
E75 =. 0.49
E77 =
E70 =
0.35
=
45,400
71,300
= 0.64
0.85
E75
E70
( F 7 0 ) + (1- F 70) (GF 7 5) =
0.49
0.85 '(0.64) +(1-0.64) 0.722
= 0.369 + 0.260 = 0.60
E77
E70
(F70) + ('1-F70) (GF77) =
~:~; (0.64) + (1-0.64) 0.740
= 0.264 + O.?hh = O.C;~
-------
TABLE 4-- 5
RESULTS OF FED. MOT. VEH. CONTROL
PROGRAl\l FOR CARBON MONOXIDE:
S. CENTRAL KAN. (WICHITA) AQCR
WITH POST""'1970 (PROPOSED) CONTROLS
E~~~~~tGr.Q'::'tb._3_~J Emissions I 10~0 TPY
I a 19 1 ....197S l 1 q77
I 100 1103 104 I' 0.5 0.5 '0.5
100' 1130 142
SOURCE CATEGORY
. ,
:Indus. and Corom. Fuel
ipower Plants
I
jprocess Losses 10
ISOlid Waste DisposaHlncin.) 100
jOther - Open Burning 1 0
!
Agricultural Burn.
50
100
Misc.
(a) Percent of emissions
after enforcement of
post-1970 regulations
(b) Percent of 1970 emissions
FROM APPENDIX I CURVE
2
E75 =
E77 =
E70 =
0.63
0.44
0.92
o
103
I
, I
104 I 1.1
L.
I
,
I
I
I
o
i 0
I
"
106
2.1
I
0.1 I, 0.1
t
i
2.2 ~ 2.3
I
i
0 i 0
!
I
':
0.8 i 0.8
13.8 13.8
\.
/
17.4
LO.562
GF75
I
\17.5
108
o 111. 9
106 108 I 1.5
100100 113.8
I I
TOTALS ~ 30.9
o
197N Total
1970 Total
I ;
J '
t 0.566:;
GF77
FROM EMISS. INVENTORY:
Motor Veh. Emiss
F70 = Total Emiss
249,500
= 280,400 = 0.89
E75
E70
( F 7 0 ) + (1- F 7 0) (GF 7 5) =
0.63
o . 9 2 (0 . 89 ) + (1- 0 . 8 9 ) O. 56 2
,8
=
E77
E70
0.608 + 0.062 = 0.67
0.44 (
(F70) + ("1-F70) (GF77) = ,0.92 .0.89) + (1-0.89) '0.566
=
0.425 + 0.062 = 0.49
-------
TABLE 4-6
RESULTS OF FED. MOT. VEH. CONTROL
PROGRAM FOR NITROGEN OXIDES
S. CENTRAL KA1\I. (WICHITA) AQCR
vVITH POST-1970 (PROPOSED)CONTROLS
Contra . . . I l-
I
actor Gr_Qwtb_3_.E./ 1000 TPY I
SOURCE CATEGORY f
a 197 1 ...1975 I 1977
.
,
, ..
: Indus. and Carom. Fuel 100 103 1104 10.0 10.3 ! 10.4
I
(
IPower Plants 95 130 142 I 14.0 17.3 ! 18.9
I
i . I
I 100 103 104" I 9.1 9.4 9.5
Iprocess Losses
iSOlid Waste Disposal(Incin.)100 106 108 0.6 0.6 0.7
i
!Other - Open Burning 0 0 0 I 0.9 0 0
I I
i
I
100 100 I 1.9 1.9 1.9 1
I
Misc.
100
I
, I
(a) Percent of emissions
after enforcement of
post-1970 regulations
(b) Percent of 1970 emissions
FROM APPENDIX I CURVE
3 :
E75 =
0.96
E77 =
E70 =
0.72
1. 09
I
TOTALS ~ 36.5, 39.5 41.4
197N Total \. 1. 08 1.13
1970 Total (
GF75 GF77
FROM EMISS. INVE.NTORY:
Motor Veh. Emiss
F70 = To~al Emiss
38,800
= 75,300
= 0.52
E75
E70
0.96
( F 7 0 ) + (1- F 7 0) (GF 7 5) = 1 . 0 9 . ( 0 . 5 2 ) + (1- 0 . 5 2 ) 1..0 8
,.
E77
E70
"
=
-0 . 4 5 6 + O. 519 = O. 9 7
0.72
(F70) + ('1-F70) (GF77) = . 1.09 (0.52) + (1-0.52)' 1.1~
= 0.342 + 0.544 - 0.89
-------
TABLE 4-7
RESULTS OF FED. MOT. VEH. CONTROL
PROGRAM FOR HYDROCARBONS
KANSAS CITY AQCR (KAN. & MO.)
WITHOUT POST-1970 CONTROLS
SOURCE CATEGORY
!
!Indus. and Comm. Fuel
,
I
Ipower Plants
'Process Losses
[SOlid Waste Disposal
I
IOther - Open Burning'
Gasoline Handling
Solvents
Misc.
(a) Percent of emissions
after enforcement of
post-1970 regulations
(b) Percent of 1970 emissions
(c) Sum of Tables 4-13 & 4-16
FROM APPENDIX I CURVE
E75 = 0.51
E77 = 0.37
E70 = 0.88
100
Emissions ,C 1000 TPY
197'1 ! lq77
118 11. 4 12.9 I 13.5
I
140 156 3.0 4.2 I 4.7
I I
113 118 I 30.2 34.1 !. 35.6
/
I
I
115 121 .2 . . 2 ' .2
J
i ,
0 0 5.7 0 i 0
I
I
I
113 118 8.6 9.7 i 10.1
,
113 ' 118 5.5 6.2 6.5
100 100 8.7 8.7 8.7
TOTALS -> 73.3 76.0 t 79.3
197N Total 'I. 1. 04 1. 08
1970 Total (
GF75 GF77
FROM EMISS. INVENTORY:
F70 Motor Veh. Emiss
=
Total Emiss
100
100
100
o
100
100
'I 100
1
= 112,900 = 0.606
186,20,0
E75
E70
0.51
( F 70) + (1- F 70) (GF 75) = 0 . 88 (0. 606 ) + (1"" 0 . 6 0 6 ) 1. 0 4
E77
E70
=
0.350 + 0.409 = 0.76
(F70) + (1-F70){GF77) = ~:~~ (0.606) + (1-0.606) 1.08
= 0.254 + 0.426 = 0.68
-------
TABLE 4-8
RESULTS OF FED. MOT. VEH. CONTROL
PROGRAM FOR CARBON MONOXIDES
KANSAS CITY AQCR (KAN. & MO.)
WITHOUT POST-1970 CONTROLS
:Controt Growth
actor --- ---
a 1 7
100 113 1118
100 140 156
SOURCE CATEGORY
!
iIndus. and Corom. Fuel
I
I
,
Ipower Plants
I
Iprocess Losses.
jso1id Waste Disposal
I h .
JOt er - Open BurnJ.ng
Misc.
100
I 10:
100
'I
(a) Percent of emissions
after enforcement of
post-1970 regulations
(b) Percent of 1970 emissions
(c) Sum of ~ab1es 4-14 & 4-17
FROM APPENDIX I CURVE
2
E75 = 0.65
E77 = 0.46
E70 = 0.95
113
115
I
118 I
lcns
1.3 1.5
5.3 7.4
8.7 9.9
0.9 1.0
14.4 0
17.5 17.5
1000 TPY
! 1q77
\
!
I 1.5
,
i
! ' 8.3
r 10.2
I
!
i 1.1
i
J
,
I
I
i
, 17.5
o
, 38..6
197N Total
1970 Total
"
/
0.77510.794 !
GF75 GF77
0.636 + 0.054 = 0.69
0.450 + 0.055 = 0.50
121
o
100
o
100
E75
E70
TOTALS ---t-
48.1
37.3
( F 70) + ( 1- F 70) (GF 75) = ~ : ~ ~ ( 0 . 930) + ( 1- 0 . 930) 0 . 775
=
E77
E70
FROM EMISS. INVENTORY:
F = Motor Veh. Emiss
. 70 Total Emiss
= 643,100 = 0.930
691,200
(F70) + (1-F70)(GF77) = ~:~~ (0.930) + (1-0.930) 0.794
=
-------
TABLE 4-9
RESULTS OF FED. MOT. VEH. CONTROL
PROGRAM FOR NITROGEN OXIDES
KANSAS CITY AQCR (KAN. & MO.)
WITHOUT POST-1970 CONTROLS
c
SOURCE CATEGORY Emissions 1000 TPY
r
I
! i
.
i Indus. and Comm. Fuel 100 113 118 128.3 145.0 I 151. 4
i i
I I
!power Plants 100 140 156 I 81. 7 114.2 I 127.6
I I I
Iprocess Losses 100 113 118 2.6 3.0 I 3.1
,
I
I
Solid Waste Disposal 100 115 121 0.5 0.5 !, 0.6
I
I I
jOther Open Burning 0 0 0 1.0 O ! 0
- I
I
I
I Misc. 100 100 100 8.5 8.5 i 8.5
I
i
I
I
I
FROM APPENDIX I CURVE
3
TOTALS --} 222.6 271.2 291.2
19 7N Total 1. 22 I 1. 31 I
" I
1970 Total ( I
,
GF75 GF77
FROM EMISS. INVENTORY:
F = Motor Veh. Emiss
70 Total Emiss
(a) Percent of emissions
after enforcement of
post-1970 regulations
(b) Percent of 1970 emissions
(c) Sum of Tables 4-15 & 4-18
E75 =
E77 =
E70 =
1. 01
0.76
1.12
= 83,~00 = 0.273
306,300
E75
E70
1. 01
( F 70 ) + (1- F 7 0) (GF 7 5) = 1. 12 ( 0 . 2 7 3 ) + (1- 0 . 27 3 ) 1. 2 2
= 0.246 +0.887 = 1.13
E77
E70
0.76
(F70) + (1-F70)(GF77) = 1.12
(0.273) + (1-0.273) 1. 31
=
0.185 + 0.952 = 1.14
-------
TABLE ,4-10
RESULTS OF FED. MOT. VEH. CONTROL
PROGRAM FOR HYDROCARBONS
KANSAS CITY AQCR (KAN. & MO.)
WITH POST-1970 CONTROLS
SOURCE CATEGORY
Emissions c 1000 TPY
I
!
'Indus. and Comm. Fuel
.
I
,
IPower Plants
!proces's Losses
I
jsolid Waste Disposal
,
)Other - Open Burning
I
I
,
r
.
i
i
I
I
I
t
11. 4 12.9 I
I
I
3.0 4.2 I
30.2 28.8
I
I
,
. 2 .2 i
I
5.7 0 i
I
I
I
8.6 9.7 i
5.5 6.2
8.7 8.7
TOT ALS --f 73.3 70.7
197N Total \. 0.964
1970 Total (
GF75
Gasoline Handling
Solvents
Nisc.
(a) Percent of emissions
after enforcement of
post-1970 regulations
(b) Percent of 1970 emissions
(c) Sum of Tables 4-16 & 4-19
!
GF77
FROM APPENDIX I CURVE
1
FROM EMISS. INVENTORY:
Motor Veh. Emiss
F70 = Total Emiss
E75 = 0.51
E77 = 0.37
E70 = 0.88
=
112,900 - 0.606
186,200
E75
E70
0.51
( F 7 0 ) + (1- F 7 0) (GF 7 5) = 0 . 8 8 ( 0 . 60 6 ) + ( 1- 0 . 60 6 ) o. 9 6 4
=
0.350 + 0.380 = 0.73
E77
E70
(F 70) + (1- F 70)( GF 77) = ~: ~~ ( 0 . 606) + ( 1- 0 . 606) 1. 01
= 0.254 + 0.398 + 0.65
13.5
4.7
30.1 I
I
.2 I
o !
I
10.1 I
6.5 I
I
8. 7 !
1
73.8 i
I
1. 01 I
j
-------
TABLE 4-11
RESULTS OF FED. MOT. VEH. CONTROL
PROGRAM FOR CARBON MONOXIDE
KANSAS CITY AQCR (KAN. & MO.)
WITH POST-1970 CONTROLS
SOURCE CATEGORY
(a) Percent of emissions
after enforcement of
post-1970 regulations
(b) Percent of 1970 emissions
(c) Sum of Tables 4-17 & 4-20
TOTALS -;.
48.1
c 1000 TPY
! I
1975 lq77 I
1.3 1.5 I 1.5 I
I I
5.3 7.4 ! 8.3
I
r I
8.7 8.6 l 8.9 I
!
\ I
0.9 1.0 ! 1.1 I
I i
, I
14.4 0 I '0
' I
I . I
!
17.5 17.5 i 17.5 I
i
I
i
I
I
I
i
36.0 37.2 i
i
o . 7481 0.77j
I
GF75 GF77
"
/
!
:Indus. and Comm. Fuel
I
I
IPower Plants
Iprocess Losses
ISOlid Waste Disposal
jOther - Open Burning
i
r
I
!
I
!
I
Misc.
197N Total
1970 Total
FROM APPENDIX I CURVE
2
FROM EMISS. INVENTORY:
F = Motor Veh. Emiss
70 Total Emiss
E75 = 0.65
E77 = 0.46
E70 = 0.95
643,100
- 691,200 = 0.930
E75
E70
0.65
( F 7 0 ) + (1- F 7 0) (GF 7 5) = 0 . 9 5 ( 0 .9 3 0) + ( 1- 0 . 9 30 )
0.748
= 0.636. + 0.052 = 0.69
E77
E70
(F 70) + (1- F 70) ( GF 77) = ~: ~~ (0.930) + (1- 0 . 9,3 0) O. 773
= 0.450 + 0.054 = 0.50
-------
TABLE 4.-12
RESULTS OF FED. MOT. VEH. CONTROl.
PROGRAM FOR NITROGEN OXIDES
KANSAS CITY AQCR (KAN. & MO.)
WITH POST-1970 CONTROLS
SOURCE CATEGORY
Emissions c 1000 TPY
I
128.3 145.0 I
I
81. 7 113.6 I
2.6 3.0:
\ .
I
.0.5 !
!
o !
I
!
8.5 I
I
jIndus. and Comm. Fuel
i
I
IPower Plants
jprocess Losses
I
ISo1id Waste Disposal
I
iOther - Open Burning
I
0.5
1.0
Misc.
8.5
151.4 II
126.9
I
I
3.1 I
I
0.6 I
o !
I
8.5 I
I
i
I
,
(a) Percent of emissions
after enforcement of
post-1970 regulations
(b) Percent of 1970 emissions
( c) Sum 0 f .T ab 1 e 4 -18 & 4 - 21
TOTALS ~ 222.6 270.6 290.5
I
197N Total \. 1. 22 1. 30 I
I
1970 Total (
GF75 GF77
FROM APPENDIX I CURVE
3
FROM EMISS. INVENTORY:
Motor Veh. Emiss
F70 = Total Emiss
E75 = 1.01
E77 = 0.76
E70 = 1.12
=
83,700 = 0.273
306,300
E75
E70
- 1. 01
(F 70) + (1- F 70) (GF 75) - 1. 12 (0. 273) + (1- 0 . 273) 1. 22
= 0.246 + 0.887 = 1.13
E77
E70
0.76
(F 70) + (1- F 70) ( GF 77) = 1. 12 ( 0 . 273) + (1- 0 . 273) 1. 30
= 0.185 + 0.945 = 1.13
-------
TABLE 4-13
RESULTS OF FED~ MOT. VEH. CONTROL
PROGRAM FOR HYDROCARBONS
KANSAS CITY AQCR
KANSAS PORTION
WITHOUT POST-197o. CONTROLS
ontro' G th obf
row. ~
actor ---'---'- .
a 975
I-
10.0.0. TPY I
I I
1975 I 1G77
I I
0..6 0..7 I 0..7 I
I
I I
0..6 0..8 I 0..9
6.6 7.5 7.8
!
0..2' 0..2 ' 0..2
i
I
1.9 0. ' 0.
\
I
3.0. 3.4 i 3.5
4.4 5.0. 5.2
4.7 4.7 4.7
SOURCE CATEGORY
I
i Indus. and Comm. Fuel 10.0. 113 118
,
I
I
IPower Plants 10.0. 140. 156
10.0. 113 1181
jprocess Losses
ISOlid Waste Disposal 10.0. 115 121
j
\Other - Open Burning 0. 0. 0.
I
Gasoling Handling 10.0. 113 118
Solvents I 113 118
Misc. 10.0. 10.0.
I
(a) Percent of emissions TOTALS ---;.
after. enforcement of
post-197o. regulations 197N Total
(b) Percent of 1970. emissions 1970. Total
22.0.
22,3
"
/
23.0.
I i
1.0.11 1.0.41
GF75 GF77
FROM APPENDIX I CURVE
1
FROM EMISS. INVENTORY:
Motor Veh. Emiss
F7o. = Total Emiss
E75 = 0. . 51
E = 0..37
77
E7o. = 0..88
=
33,0.0.0. = 0..60.0.
55,0.0.0
E75
E7o.
0..51
( F 7 0. ) + (1- F 7 0.) (GF 7 5) = 0. . 8 8 ( 0. .'60. 0) + (1- 0. . 6 0. o.. ) 1. 0. 1
= 0..348 + .0..40. 4 = o.. 75
E77
E7o.
(F 70.) + (1- F 70.)( GF 77) = ~ : ~ ~ ( 0. . 60. Q,) + ( 1- 0. . 600.) 1. 0. 4
= 0..252 + 0..416 = 0..67
-------
.l j \..L.JJ.JJ J 1. J.. £.}
RESULTS OF FED. MOT. VEH. CONTROL
PROGRAM FOR CARBON MONOXIDE
KANSAS CITY AQCR
KANSAS PORTION
WITHOUT POST-1970 CONTROLS
SOURCE CATEGORY 1000 TPY
l.
FROM APPENDIX I CURVE
2
FROM EMISS. INVENTORY:
Motor Veh. Emiss
F70 = Total Emiss
E75 = 0.65
E77 = 0.46
E70 = 0.95
=
184,200 = 0.905
203,600
E75
E70
( F 70 ) + (1- F 7 0) (GF 7 5 )
=
~:~~ (0.905) + (1-0.905) 0.845
=
0.618 + 0.080 = 0.70
E77
E70
(F70) + (1-F70)(GF77) = ~:~~ (0.905) + (1-0.905) 0.855
= 0.437 + 0.081 = 0.52
-------
TABLE 4-15
RESULTS OF FED. MOT. VEH. CONTROL
PROGRAM FOR NIT.ROGEN OXIDES
KN~SAS CITY AQCR
KANSAS PORTION
WITHOUT POST-1970 CONTROLS
ontro G th Q
actor ~°V!.._2-
a 1975 1
100 113 118
.I..
SOURCE CATEGORY
!
!Indus. and Cornm. Fuel
,
3.1
iPower Plants 100 140 156 8.7
I I
I 100 113 118 I 1.2
jprocess Losses
I 100 115
iSolid Waste Disposal 121 0.3
i
I Open Burning
'Other - 0 0 0 0.2
j
Misc. 100 100 100 I 5.2
(a) Percent of emissions
after enforcement of
post-1970 regulations
(b) Percent of 1970 emissions
TOTALS ~
18.7
197N Total
1970 Total
\.
/
FROM APPENDIX I CURVE
3
3.5 I 3.7
I
12.2 I 13.6
!
1.4 ~. 1.4
I .
!
0.3 ' 0.4
i
I
0 ' 0
I
i
I
5.2 i
5.2
22.6
I
I
I
I
24.3 !
I
1. 30 I
I
GF77
1. 21
GF75
E75 =
1. 01
FROM EMISS. INVENTORY:
Motor Veh. Emiss
F70 = Total Emiss
E77 = 0.76
E70 = 1.12
= 25,800 = 0.579
44,506
E75
E70
( F 70) + (1- F 70) (GF 75) = ~ : ~ ~ ( 0 . 579 ) + ( 1- 0 . 579 ) 1. 21
=
0.521 + .0.510 = 1.03
E77
E70
0.76
(F70) + (1-F70)(GF77) = 1.12 (0.579) + (1-0.579) 1.30
=
0.392 + 0.548 = 0.94
-------
TABLE 4-16
RESULTS OF FED. MOT. VEH. CONTROL
PROGRAM" FOR HYDROCARBONS
KANSAS CITY AQCR
MISSOURI PORTION
WITHOUT POST-1970 CONTROLS
ontro G tl 0
row 1 15
actor --
a 1
1000 TPY
1975 ( lCi77 ,
I I
12.2 12.8 I
I
I
I i
3.4 ! 3.8
I I
I I
26.6 ( " 27.8 i
I I
~ i
! I
o I 0 I
, I
o i 0
I
I I
! 1
I 1
4.0 4.0
1.2 1.3
6.3 6.6
SOURCE CATEGORY
1 and Corom. Fuel
IIndus. 100 113 118 10.8
I
I
,Power Plants 100 140 156 I 2.4
,
Iprocess Losses 100 113 118 23.6
Solid Waste Disposal 100 115 121 0
I
'Other - Open Burning 0 0 0 3.8
I
1
I Misc. 100 100 100 4.0
,
I
' Solvents 100 113 118 1.1
I
,
I 118 I
Gasoline Handling 100 113 5.6
I
(a) Percent of emissions
after enforcement of
post-1970 regulations
(b) Percent of 1970 emissions
TOTALS ----;.. 51.3 53.7 56.3
197N Total 1. 05 I
\. 1. 08.
1970 Total (
GF75 GF77
FROM APPENDIX I CURVE
1
FROM EMISS. INVENTORY:
Motor Veh. Emiss
F70 = Total Emiss
E75 = 0.51
E77 = 0.37
E70 = 0.88
79,000
= 131,200 = 0.609
E75
E70
( F 70 ) + (1- F 70) (GF 7 5) = ~ : ~ ~ ( 0 . 60 9 ) + ( 1- 0 . 60 9 ) 1. 0 5
= 0 . 3 5 2 + "0. 412 = o. 7 6
E77
E70
(F 70) + (1- F 70)( GF 77) = ~ : ~ ~ ( 0 . 609) + ( 1- 0 . 609) 1. 08
=
0.256 + 0.423 = 0.68
-------
'l'ABLE 4 -17
RESULTS OF FED. MOT. VEH. CONTROL
PROGRAM FOR CARBON MONOXIDES
KANSAS CITY AQCR
MISSOURI PORTION
WITHOUT POST-1970 CONTROLSr
ontrot Growth .f
a~tor ~~~5Ti-; .
~
I
i
SOURCE CATEGORY
, I
j Indus. and Corom. Fuel 100 1131 118 0.5 0.6 0.6
i
I
, I
I
ipower Plants I 100 140 1561 5.2 7.3 ! 8.1
i I I .
I
I I 1181 1
jProcess Losses 100 113 7.4 8.4 i. 8.7
ISOlid Waste \
Dispos al (Incin .1) I
100 115 121 0 . 0 I 0
i
I !
i f
jOther Open Burning 0 0 0 11. 0 0 ' 0
,
I
!
Misc. 100 100 100 4.6 4.6 I 4.6
(a) Percent of emissions
after enforcement of
post-1970 regulations
\;,) PC.rcent of 1970 emissions
TOTALS ~ 28.7 20.9 22.0
197N Total \. 0.728 0.7671
1970 Total -:
GF75 GF77
FROM APPENDIX I CURVE
2
FROM EMISS. INVENTORY:
Motor Veh. Emiss
F70 = Total Emiss
E75 =
E77 =
E70 =
0.65
0.46
0.95
=
458,900 = 0 941
487,600 .
. E75
E70
0.65
( F 70 ) + (1- F 70) (GF 7 5) = O. 9 5 (0. 9 41) + ( 1- 0 . 9 41 ) O. 7 2 8
= 0.645 + 0.057 = 0.70
E77
E70
0.46
(F 70) + (1- F 70)( GF 77) = O. 95 (0. 941) + ( 1- 0 . 941) O. 767
= 0.454 + 0.060 = 0.51
-------
I-~----.._-~.
SOURCE CATEGORY
i ( I
1Indus. and Corom. Fuel 100 113 118 125.2 141. 5! 147.7 I
'
,
I 1
IPower Plants 100 140 156 73.0 102 . O! 114.0
I l
100 113 118 I 1.4 1.7
Iprocess Losses 1. 6 I
i
\
iS01id Waste Disposal 100 115 121 0.2 \ 0.2
0.2 ;
I
I
:Other - I
Open Burning 0 0 0 0.8 0: 0
I I
I
Mics. 100 100 100 3.3 3.3 i 3.3
I
!
I I
I
I I
I
I I
(a) Percent of emissions TOTALS ~ I \
203.9 248.6 266.9
after enforcement of I
i
post-1970 regulations 197N Total 1. 22 I 1. 31 I
\. !
emissions 1970 Total ( i
(b) Percent of 1970 GF75 GF77
FROM APPENDIX I CURVE
3
FROM EMISS. INVENTORY:
Motor Veh. Emiss
F70 = Total Emiss
E75 =
1. 01
E =
77
E70 =
0.76
1.12
57,900 -
= 261,800 - 0.221
E75
E70
1. 01
(F 70) + (1- F 70) (GF 75) = 1. 12 ( 0 . 221) + ( 1- 0 . 211) 1. 22
= 0.199 + 0.950 = 1.15
E77
E70
0.70
(F70) + (1-F70)(GF77) = 1.12 (0.221) + (1-0.211) 1.31
= 0.138 + 1.02 = 1.16
-------
- ....L...- - --- -
TABLE 4-19
RESULTS OF FED. MOT. VEH. CONTROL
PROGRAM FOR HYDROCARBONS
KANSAS CITY AQCR
KANSAS PORTION
WITH POST-1970 CONTROLS
I
iIndus. and Comrn. Fuel
!
IPower Plants
Iprocess Losses 30
Isolid Waste Disposal (Incin'l) 100
I . ~
IOther - Open Burning I 0
Gasoline Handling 11100
Solvents 100
I
1100
100
1100
.I..
1000 TPY
1975 ! ]q77
113 0.6 0.7 f 0.7
I
,
140 0.6 0.8 i 0.9
I
I .
113 6.6 2.2 ! 2.3
I .
i
, I
115 121 0.2 0.2 I 0.2
I
,
0 0 1.9 0 ' 0
,
I
I
I
113 118 3.0 3.4 3.5
113 118 4.4 5.0 5.2
100 110 4.7 4.7 4.7
SOURCE CATEGORY
Misc.
(a) Percent of emissions
after enforcement of
post-1970 regulations
(b) Percent of 1970 emissions
TOTALS --} 22.0 17.0 17~5
I
197N Total \. 0.773 0.7951
( . .
1970 Total
GF75 GF77
FROM APPENDIX I CURVE
1
FROM EMISS. INVENTORY:
Motor Veh. Emiss
F70 = Total Emiss
E75 = 0.51'
E77 = 0.37
E70 = 0.88
=
33,~~0 = 0.600
55,000
E75
E70
0.51
(F70) + (1-F70) (GF75) = 0.88 (0.600) + (1-0.600) 0.773
=0.348 ... 0.310 = 0.66
E77
E70
0.37
(F70) + (1-F70)(GF77) = 0.88 (0.600) + (1-0.600) 0.795
= 0.252 + 0.318 = 0.57
-------
TABLE 4-20
RESULTS OF FED. MOT. VEH. CONTROL
PROGRAM FOR CARBON MONOXIDE
KANSAS CIT);" AQCR
KA1~SAS PORTION
WITH POST-1970 CONTROLS
ontro G th 0
row '6
actor _. I
a 19 5 I
100 113 118
SOURCE CATEGORY
I
iIndus. and Corom. Fuel
I
:
IPower Plants
!process Losses
jSOlid Waste Disposal
I
jOther - Open Burning
i
, .
.
"
!
Misc.
0.8
1000 TPY
1975 I 1 q77
0.9 I 0.9
I
I
0.1 1.0.2
.
,
0.2 ) 0.2
100 140 156
I
10 113 1181
11°: 115 121
o 0
I
100 100 100
0.1
1.3
i .
I
, 1. 0 :
I
I
o :
0.9
1.1
3.4
o
12.9
I
I
12.9 I 12.9
TOTALS ~
(a) Percent of emissions
after enforcement of
post-1970 regulations
(b) Percent of 1970 emissions
FROM APPENDIX I CURVE
E75 =
E77 =
E70 =
0.65
0.46
0.95
19.4
15.1
15.3
I
0.77~ 0.7881
GF75 GF77
197N Total
1970 Total
"
/
2
FROM EMISS. INVENTORY:
Motor Veh. Emiss
F70 = Total Emiss
184,200 -
= 203,600 - 0.905
E75
E70
( F 70 ) + (1- F 7 0) (GF 7 5 )
E77
E70
=
~:~; (0.905) + (1-0.905) 0.778
= 0.618 + 0.074 = 0.69
0.46
(F70) + (1-F70)(GF77) = 0.95 (0.905) + (1-0.905) 0.788
= 0.437 + 0.075 = 0.51
-------
TABLE 4-21
RESULTS OF FED. MOT. VEli. CONTROL
PROGRAM FOR NITROGEN OXIDES
KANSAS CITY AQCR
KA1\ISAS PORTION
WITH POST~1970 CONTROLS
ontro Growth
actor -------
a 19 5
1000 TPY
r
3.5 I 3.7
I
I
11.6 f ,12.9
1.4 i 1.4
I .
\
0.3 i 0.4
,
SOURCE CATEGORY
I
iIndus. and Cornm. Fuel 100 113 118 3.1
,
J
!power Plants 95 140 156 8.7
I
,Process Losses 100 113 1181 1.2
ISOlid Waste Disposal 100 115 121 0.3
f
I
iOther - Open Burning 0 0 0 0.2
Misc. 100 100 100 5.2
o i
I
I
i
5.2
o
5.2
(a) Percent of emissions
after enforcement of
post-1970 regulations
(b) Percent of 1970 emissions
TOTALS --:>- 18.7 22.0 23.6
197N Total \. 1.18 1. 26
1970 Total -:
GF75 GF77
FROM APPENDIX I CURVE
3
FROM EMISS. INVENTORY:
Motor Veh. Emiss
F70 = Total Emiss
E75 =
E77 =
E70 =
1. 01
0.76
1.12
=
25,800 = 0.578
44,500
E75
E70
1. 01
( F 70) + (1- F 70) (GF 75) = 1. 12 (0 . 578) + ( 1- 0 . 578) 1. 18
=
0.521 + 0.498 = 1.02
E77
E70
0.76
(F70) + (1-F70)(GF77) = 1.12 (0.578) + (1-0.578) 1.26.
= 0.392 + 0.532 = 0.92
------- |