United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of
Emergency and
Remedial Response
EPA/ROD/R04-89/046
March 1989
&EPA Superfund
Record of Decision:
Celanese
(Shelby Fiber Operations), NC
-------
50272-101
REPORT DOCUMENTATION
PAGE
1. REPORT NO.
EPA/ROD/R04-89/046
3. Recipient's Accession No.
4. Title and Subtf tie
SUPERFUND RECORD OF DECISION
Celanese (Shelby Fiber Operations), NC
Second Remedial Action - Final
5. Report Due
3/28/89
. Authors)
8. Performing Organization Rept No.
9. Performing Organization Name and Address
10. Pro|ect/Ta*k/Work Unit No.
11. ContractfC) or Grant(G) No.
(C)
12. Sponsoring Organization Nam and Address
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
401 M Street,.S.W. '
Washington, D.C. 20460
IX Type of Report & Period Covered
800/000
14. '
15. Supplementary Notes
16. Abstract (Limit: 200 words)
The 450-acre Celanese Fiber Operations (CFO) site, is a polyester raw-material
production facility located in Cleveland County, North Carolina. The plant's
facilities include a plant production area, wastewater treatment area, former waste
disposal areas, and a land farm area. The adjacent land is rural, and some residences
are located within 1 mile of the site. The plant began operations in 1960 as Fiber
Industries, Inc. and manufactured polyester polymer chip and filament yarn using the
-hemicals dimethyl terephthalate and ethylene glycol. The plant's waste treatment
icility was constructed in phases concurrent with the manufacturing plant; thus, in
^he years prior to the completion of the treatment facility, chemical wastes were
dumped directly into a drainage ditch. Treated effluent has been discharged to Buffalo
Creek since the mid-1960s when Fiber Industries, Inc. completed construction of the
treatment facility. Celanese Corporation bought the site and facilities in 1983. In
addition to the discharge from the wastewater treatment plant, CFO also discharges
alum-treated bandcaster water directly to Buffalo Creek. Several areas around the
plant have been used for waste disposal, including old burning pits for normal plant
wastes (polyester and trash), a glycol recovery unit (GRU) sludge burial area, two
soak-away ponds used to contain treated sanitary sewage from 1960 to 1969, and a former
(See Attached Sheet)
NC
17. Document Analysis a. Descriptors
Record of Decision - Celanese (Shelby Fiber Operations)
Second Remedial Action - Final
Contaminated Media: soil, sediment
Key Contaminants: VOCs (benzene, TCE), other organics (phenols, PAHs), metals (lead,
chromium)
b. UentMers/Open-BKled Terra
C. COSATI FMoVGroup
18. AvailsbUty Statement
1C. Security das* (This Report)
None
20. Security Class (This Page)
None
21. No. of Pages
125
22. Price
^ ANS1-Z39.18)
See fnetrucD'ona on Renvne
(Formerly NT1S-3S)
Department of Commerce
-------
EPA/ROD/R04-89/046
Celanese (Shelby Fiber Operations), NC
Second Remedial Action - Final
n.6. Abstract (Continued)
rum storage and staging area. Four additional buried waste areas are located to the
north and outside of the main plant perimeter fence: a polymer and fiber landfill, a
construction debris landfill, a 21-acre sludge disposal area, and a drum storage area
which temporarily stored 2,000 to 3,000 drums of waste chemicals and solvents from 1970
to 1978. The drums were removed by 1978. A 1988 Record of Decision addressed
extraction and treatment of contaminated ground water. This second operable unit
addresses source control including contaminated sludge and soil associated with the
glycol recovery unit (GRU) trenches and burn pit areas. The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the soil and sediment are VOCs including benzene and TCE; other
organics including phenols and PAHs; and metals including lead and chromium.
The selected remedial action for this site includes excavation .of 3,710 yd of glycol
recovery unit (GRU) sludges, plastic chips, burn pit residuals, arid sediment with onsite
incineration of contaminated soil and GRU sludges and chemical fixation (solidification)
of incinerator ash, plastic chips, burn pit residuals and sediment, followed by disposal
of the inert, solidified material in the excavated area; regrading and filling of
excavated area; and ground water monitoring. The estimated present worth cost for this
remedial action is $3,500,000; O&M costs were not provided.
-------
COMF1 u'.
OF;
iK
No.
•"***•*.
DECLARATION FOR THE ENFORCEMENT RECORD OP DECISION
SITE; CELANESE FIBERS OPERATIONS
SHELBY, NORTH CAROLINA
Statement of Purpose;
This decision document represents the selected remedial action for this site
developed in accordance with CERCLA as amended by SARA, and to the extent
practicable, the National Contingency Plan. The State of North Carolina
concurs with the selected remedy.
Statement of Basis
This decision is based upon the Administrative Record for the Celanese Fibers
Operations Site. The attached index identifies the items which comprise the
Administrative Record upon which the selection of a remedial action is based.
Description of Selected Remedy:
This is Operable Unit Two of the Remedial Actions to be undertaken at the
Site. The Operable Unit One Remedial Action is excavation and treatment of
contaminated groundwater. Construction of the system is currently underway.
Operable Unit Two addresses the contaminant source at the Site.
- Source control
* Excavation of glyeol recovery unit (CRO) sludges, plastic chips, burn
pit residuals and stream sediments.
* Incineration on-site of contaminated soils and CRU sludges.
• Chemical fixation (solidification) of incinerator ash, plastic chips,
burn pit residuals and stream sediments.
• On-site disposal of inert, solidified material.
* Regrading
• Monitoring
-------
for
appropriate, and ia
Greer C. Tidwell
Regional Administrator
-------
ENFORCEMENT RECORD OF DECISION
SUMMARY OF REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVE SELECTION
CELANESE FIBERS OPERATIONS SITE
SHELBY, NORTH CAROLINA
Prepared By:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region IV
Atlanta, Georgia
-------
XABLE O? CONTENTS
Page Number
1.0 SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION 1
2.0 SITE HISTORY AND ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES 1
3.0 COMMUNITY RELATIONS HISTORY 5
4.0 SCOPE AND ROLE OP OPERABLE UNIT OR
RESPONSE ACTION IN SITE STRATEGY 6
5.0 SUMMARY OP SITE CHARACTERISTICS 6
6.0 DISCUSSION OP CLEAN-UP CRITERIA (ARARS) 9
7.0 SUMMARY OP SITE RISKS 11
6.0 DEVELOPMENT AND SCREENING OP ALTERNATIVES 12
9.0 SUMMARY OP COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OP ALTERNATIVES 33
10.0 SELECTED REMEDY 36
11.0 STATUATORY DETERMINATIONS 37
ATTACHMENTS
1.0 RESPONSIVENESS SUMMARY 1
2.0 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX 2
-------
ENFORCEMENT RECORD OP DECISION
SUMMARY OF REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVE SELECTION
CELANESE FIBERS OPERATIONS SITE
SHELBY, CLEVELAND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
1.0 SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
The Celanese Fibers Operations (CFO) site La a 450-acre property occupied by
a polyester raw-material production facility (Figure 1-1). The site is
located in south-central Cleveland County on North Carolina Highway 198. It
is approximately one mile north of Earl, North Carolina and six miles south
of Shelby. The nearest major city is Charlotte, North Carolina, 35 miles
northeast of Shelby.
The plant facilities consist of the plant production area, wastewater
treatment area, former waste disposal areas, land farm area, and the
recreation and tree farm areas to the south of the main plant.
The majority of the land surface reflects cultural modification by
construction, and by cutting and filling. The original soil profile has
probably been either truncated or covered across much of the site, and was
never conclusively identified as undisturbed during the field investigations
of the RI. The plant production area is predominantly covered with buildings
and paved or gravelled areas. However, to the east, toward the waste water
treatment area, the site becomes more open, with the majority of the land
covered by impoundments, with grass and access roads in between. The sludge
land farm is north of the plant production area and overgrown with coarse
grasses. The recreation area and tree farm to the south have no facilities
related to the plant process.
Adjacent land use is rural; some residences are located within one mile of
the site.
2.0 SITE HISTORY AND ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES
Fiber Industries, Inc., a joint venture of Celanese Corporation and Imperial
Chemicals, Inc., was the original owner of the plant and operated it from
1960 until 1983 when the Celanese Corporation bought out the facility.
Celanese now operates it as Celanese Fibers Operations (CFO).
Operation* at the Shelby facility began in April of 1960. Manufacturing
operation* included the production of polyester polymer chip and filament
yarn. The principal chemicals involved in polymer production are dimethyl
terephthalate and ethylene glycol. Other small quantity additives include
titanium dioxide and antimony.
The CFO waste treatment plant was constructed in phases concurrent with the
manufacturing plant. During part of the early years, chemical wastes were
discharged through a ditch draining in a generally easterly direction. The
ditch began near the western edge of what is now known as the former drum
storage area, and travelled east to the northeast corner of the present
-------
\
Spriag-5
..^ < \r%^ jv
I rA~/>f »•
'mtf
••••*»
/«~— •£ H - ^-^aKF
^r° * jKr :-vteif*ur^^fc
•VXJ"1— " . '/' ] ^^^ ~,
-------
- 3 -
emergency spill ponds. The ditch was replaced with pipee when the waste
treatment plant became fully operational in the mid-1960'a. In 1973, the
plant was .expanded with the addition of a polishing pond, two emergency apill
ponds, and an additional aeration basin. The treated effluent from the waste
treatment plant is piped to a discharge point on Buffalo Creek.
The concrete-lined portions of the waste treatment facility include a
chromate reduction pond which is no longer in use, a digester, three
equalization basins, two aeration basins, and two clarifiers. The unlined
plant units include the three polishing ponds, two sludge ponds, and two
emergency spill ponds.
In addition to the discharge from the wastewater treatment plant, the
Celanese facility also discharges alum-treated bandcaster water directly to
Buffalo Creek. Bandcaster water is used to cook the polymer products. Both
of these discharges are covered by permits from the North Carolina Department
of Natural Resources.
Several areas around the plant have been used for waste disposal. Normal
plant wastes (primarily polyester and miscellaneous trash) were disposed of
in old burning pits located just north of the aeration basins. North and
east of the burning pits, glycol recovery unit (GRD) sludge was buried during
the early 1960's in trenches. Figure 2-1 shows the location of fill areas
and differentiates the fill types. West of the GRO sludge burial area is a
former drum storage and staging area. Solutions which failed to polymerize
were stored here during the early 1960's. The drums were removed in the
mid-1960's, and the storage area was backfilled. Two soak-away ponds located
west of the existing aeration basins were used to contain treated sanitary
sewage during the period from 1960 to 1969.
Four areas of buried waste are located to the north and outside of the main
plan perimeter fence. The polymer and fiber landfill contains primarily
non-hazardous inert materials such as excavation spoil and waste construction
yarn. The construction debris landfill contains items such as old cinder
blocks and steel strapping bands. Approximately 21 acres of the northwest
quadrant of the property have been issued permits by the North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources for sludge disposal since 1978.
In the period from 1970 to 1978, approximately 2000 to 3000 drums of waste
chemicals and solvents, including lab packs, were stored temporarily in the
area known as the drum storage area near the former burning pits. All drums
were removed, from the area by 1978 and sent to outside disposal facilities.
Investigation of the Celanese Fibers Operations Site began in October 1981
when CFO contracted with the firm Soil £ Material engineers, Inc. (SOCK), to
install 23 groundwater monitor wells. In conjunction with the groundwater
monitor well installation program, S&MS also conducted a hydrogeologic
evaluation. Subsequently, CFO initiated a groundwater sampling and analysis
program under the supervision of Davis 6 Floyd Laboratories, Inc.
S&ME also conducted an electromagnetic survey and excavated test pits at the
site.
-------
f - toon i/ATION B
C - ClAMrCft
- OWE STEM
*"• CATION BASM
SP- SLUOCE POND
f- EMERGENCY POND
"•- PW.ISIIWC POND
FIGURE 2-1
OF FILL
-------
- s -
In October 1984, CFO was proposed for BPA's National Priorities List (NPL).
Also in October 1984, there were a series of meetings between the EPA and CPO
to discuss the preparation of a Work Plan for a Remedial Investigation (RI)
and Feasibility Study (FS) by CFO's contractor, S&MB. Concurrent with this,
EPA*s contractor, Camp Dresser £ HcKee, Inc. (COM), prepared a report that
included a review of the data collected during previous site investigations
and identified information deficiencies and data gaps to provide a basis for
development of Remedial Investigation activities. These events resulted in
the submission of a draft Work Plan by S&ME, on behalf of CFO, with final
Work Plan submitted to KPA in November 1985. CFO signed an Administrative
Order on Consent to perform the RI/FS on March 10, 1986. In June of 1986,
the EPA added the site to the NPL.
The RI report for the site was final in July of 1987 and determined that two
areas of the site needed to be addressed: former glycol recovery unit waste
pits.and other scattered disposal pits, and groundwater contaminated by the
waste in those pits. Due to the groundwater contamination and the potential
for it to move off-site, EPA approved SME's proposal for a two-phased
clean-up action. These two phases are identified as Operable Unit One (OU
#1), which focuses on the contaminated groundwater, and Operable Onit Two (00
92), which focuses on the sludges and soils associated with the former glycol
recovery unit trenches and burn pit areas.
The Operable Unit FS for the first operable unit, the groundwater
remediation, was completed in February of 1988. The ROD for that Remedial
Action (OD 91) was signed March 23, 1988, and required extraction and
treatment of contaminated groundwater associated with the site. The
potentially responsible party, Hoechst Celanese, agreed to conduct the
Remedial Action for O0 #1 in a partial Consent Decree June 30, 1988. It has
since been entered with the Court.
The Operable Unit FS for O0 92 Remedial Action was final in February 1989.
This remedial action will address contaminant source control at the site.
A special notice letter for Operable Unit Two (O0 12) was issued by the
Agency and received by Hoechat Celanese on February 15, 1989. Negotiations
are on-going.
3.0 COMMUNITY a^AT^MS HISTORY
Two information repositories have been established for the sitet one in
Earl, North 'Carolina, and one in Shelby. Information is also available in
Atlanta, Georgia, in the EPA Region IV Regional Office. Fact Sheets and
press advisories were prepared prior to each public meeting. Prior to both
Feasibility Study public meetings, public notices ran in local newspapers.
A public meeting was held on September 24, 1985 to present the draft RI/FS
Work Plan to interested parties. A Community Relations Plan identifying a
positive public outreach strategy was developed by Region IV personnel in
October 1985. A public meeting was held on July 21, 1986 to present the
findings of the RI to interested citizens. On February 3, 1988, a public
-------
— - 6 -
meeting was held on the proposed plan and PS for Operable Unit One. This
public meeting opened the 21 day public comment period for the Operable Unit
One Feasibility Study and Proposed Plan.
Numerous 'questions were asked at the meeting and a number of coaments were
received. Few comments were on the selected alternative. The majority of
the comments received were actually requests to have private wells sampled.
These requests were handled by the Cleveland County Health Department in
concert with the North Carolina Department of Human Services. The public
showed a desire for remediation of the site.
Two availability sessions were held on August 16, 198S to present the
Remedial Design Report to the public and to allow them to get information on
a one on one basis. The county commission was briefed prior to the sessions.
On February 16, 1989, a public meeting was held on the proposed plan for
Operable Dnlt Two, and to present the Operable Unit Two Feasibility Study to
interested citizens. This meeting opened the 21 day public comment period on
the Proposed Plan and draft PS.
A Responsiveness Summary was prepared to summarize community concerns and
EPA's community relations activities for the RODs associated with each
Operable Unit.
OPERABLE UNIT OR RESPONSE ACTION IN SITE STRATEGY
This Remedial Action (O0 #2) will address a principal threat at the site
posed by contaminant mass and contaminated soils remaining on-site. The
principal threat at the site from subsequent groundwater contamination was
addressed previously by OO #1. The principal threat of future contamination
of groundwater is addressed by OU 92, the source remediation. Therefore,
this Operable Unit (OO 12) is expected to be the final Remedial Action for
the site.
5.0 SDMMARy OF SITK CHARACTERISTICS
Chemical analyses were performed on soil, groundwater, surface water, and
sediment samples collected at the site during the RI. These analyses
documented the presence of various groups of compounds including phthalates,
phenols, polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), other semi-volatlies,
volatile organic* and metals.
The RI included the collection of soil samples from test borings, well
borings and test pits. These samples were collected from areas suspected of
containing the contaminant sources (disposal fill area), upgradient
(background area) and downgradient areas.
The western terrace of the lawn area adjacent to the wastewater treatment
plant encompasses the GRD disposal pits and former burn pits. This area is
thought to be the primary source of contamination being released to
groundwater and surface water systems. The general location of the disposal
-------
HCfNO
A/'I'HOXIUAIt
EXHHI or
SOU CONTAMINATION
circot mcovinr
SLUDOE Pit
AUfA OF CRU SLUDGE
TMACKMC (SUEAMNCI
• CXISTMC UOMTOH WELL
f QI/X4I7ATION BASH
(I AHf »H
NOIf • ,/
it* BURN rns. ctrcot MCCOVEMY
SLUDGC m* MO MCA Of GMU 51 UOCt
TMACKMG WCNE TAKEN FNOU HSTOWCAL
AEMAL PHOTOS.
FIGURE 5-1
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF CONTAMINANTS
-------
LEGEND
EOMIZATION BASM
C - ClARIFCR
0 • DIGESTER
*H - AERATION DASM
SP - SI UDCE POND
EMERGENCY POND
POLISHMC POND
TEST PIT
SOt. TEST BORMG
no 100
FIGURE 5-2
EXPLORATION POINT LOCATION MAP
00
-------
- 9 -
facilities are shown on Figure 5-1 as interpreted from historic aerial
photographs. Chemical analysis of soil/waste samples collected in this area
documented the presence of phthalates, benzene and other non-phenolic
aromatic compounds, PAHs, phenol, ketone compounds and dibenzofuran. Figure
5-2 is a map of the western terrace of the lawn area and wastewater treatment
plant showing the location of exploratory test pits and test borings.
The soil geochemical data gathered during the RI and presented on the cross-
sections indicate that soil contamination of various degrees extends to
depths in excess of 30 feet below land surface in the probable source area.
Waste volumes were estimated for the GRD sludges and burn pit wastes based on
the visual description of materials encountered in test pits and soil
borings, and the estimated sizes of the pits from the aerial photographs.
These calculations and the results of the expanded characterization study
estimate that about 3,600 cubic yards of GRO sludge and burn pit materials
are buried in the lawn area.
Analysis of stream sediments showed generally similar compound classes to
those present in the fill areas but at lower concentrations. The phthalate
group generally predominated; however, the location showing the highest
organic loading also showed PAHs. The higher concentrations of compounds
were generally on the perimeter streams to the north of the wastewater
treatment plant. These areas were possibly subject to direct overland flow
of waste or contaminated liquid during the early plant operation, may
currently receive some erosional loading from the fill areas, and do receive
storm water runoff from the plant production area. Figure 5-3 shows the
stream sediment sampling points and the concentrations of total HSL organics
measured during the RI sampling.
The total volume in cubic yards (cy) of materials in the source area is
estimated to be:
Plastic
GRU Burn Pit Material Chios ft Solids Total
1800 cy 1200 cy 600 cy 3600 cy
These values include a 20% allowance to account for soil removed while
excavating these materials.
Soil below the GRO and burn pit materials have probably been contaminated by
percolation of precipitation through these waste materials. Some of the soil
would be excavated and remediated along with the source material. However,
some contamination will be left in place because of its depth, and
difficulties associated with excavating it. The contaminated material tends
to liquify when exposed to friction, which complicates deep excavation. It
is anticipated that the residual contamination will be removed by the inner
tier groundwater extraction system after it has been leached to the water
table due to the high solubility of contaminants in water.
-------
NOTE:
- NOT SAMPLED
* NOT DETECTED
SURFACE
SAUPLJNC LOCATION
FIGURE 5-3
ORGANIC CONCENTRATIONS IN SEDIMENT AND
SURFACE WATER SAMPLES
-------
- 11 -
6.0 DISCUSSION OP CLEANUP CRITERIA fARARs)
The requirements in CBRCLA specify that remedial actions comply with
applicable or relevant and appropriate requirements (ARARs). Applicable
requirements mean those cleanup standards or environmental protection
requirements promulgated under Federal or State law that specifically address
a hazardous substance, pollutant or remedial action at a CERCLA site.
Relevant and appropriate requirements means those cleanup standards or other
environmental protection requirements promulgated under Federal or State law
while not "applicable" to a hazardous substance, pollutant or remedial action
at a CERCLA site address problems or situations similar to those encountered
at a CERCLA site.
No ARARs have been established for soils. EP Toxicity testing reported in
the RZ indicated that representative site soils and sludges from the base of
the Emergency Ponds did not leach metals above the threshold value that would
classify them as hazardous and a potential metals contamination source.
However, the RZ analyses did identify a variety of organic compounds in both
the soil/waste and groundwater, documenting the leachability of some
organics.
7.0 SUMMARY OF SZTE RISKS
A suite of indicator parameters was chosen/ according to the guidelines put
forth in the Superfund Public Health Evaluation Manual (EPA, 1986), for
toxological interpretation and review purposes. Generally, this process
directs the selection of chemicals which best represent the hazards
associated with the site based on concentration in the environmental medium
of concern and a relative toxicity constant. Application of this process
resulted in the selection of benzene, trichloroethylene (TCB)
bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate, lead, and chromium as the indicator chemicals.
These were developed by considering the primary route of exposure through
ingestion of groundwater.
Several assumptions were made in performing the health evaluation. Zt was
assumed that chemicals present at the site could be transported off-site in
groundwater and be consumed by persons within a 1-mile radius of the site.
Further, it was assumed that off-site groundwater concentrations of indicator
chemicals would equal the mean concentrations present at the site.
A comparison of the total dally indicator chemical intaxes for an adult and
child was mad* by assuming a daily water Ingestion of 2 liters/day for adults
and 1 liter/day for children. With the exception of bis(2-ethylhexyl)
phthalate, tnls resulted in the estimated total dally Intakes of Indicator
chemicals exceeding that allowed by ARARs for both children and adults.
The greatest non-carcinogenic health risks associated with potential
indicator chemical exposure are due to Ingestion of lead. Zn particular,
young children (less than 6 years old) may be very sensitive to the
neurotoxic effects of lead and should be considered the receptor population
at greatest risk of developing lead intoxication (XPA 1984).
-------
- 12 -
The non-carcinogenic health risks associated with the calculated exposures to
benzene, bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate, and trichloroethylene are considered
minimal. There is no human evidence to suggest that exposure to these
chemicals at the calculated mean concentrations in groundwater would cause
chronic health effects.
Trichloroethylene, benzene and bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate are considered
potential carcinogens. Estimates of the cancer risk associated with
potential exposure to these compounds are considered low. However, the
calculated risk due to exposure to benzene is higher than the risks
associated with exposure to bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate and
trichloroethylene.
The public health assessment performed during Operable Unit One concluded
that with continued release of contaminants from the source into the
groundwater there is the potential for exposure to the indicator chemicals at
levels above acceptable concentration levels and some potential for
carcinogenic risk above the 10 risk level by down-gradient users based on
a conservative scenario.
The comparison of ambient water quality criteria for aquatic life with
concentration observed at stream exposure points indicates that aquatic life
in the surface water in the vicinity of the Celanese Fibers site may
experience toxic effects from exposures to bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate and
chromium. Ambient water quality criteria for bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
indicate that acute toxic effects have been observed in freshwater at 3 ug/L
(EPA, 1986). The concentrations of 20 and 50 ug/L were observed at two
exposure points for bis (ethylhexyl) phthalate. Ambient water quality
criteria for chromium indicate that safe levels of acute and chronic exposure
to chromium are 16 and 11 ug/L for freshwater aquatic life. At one exposure
point, the level of chromium was 63 ug/L, which significantly exceeded
ambient water quality criteria.
8.0 DEVELOPMENT AND SCREENING OP ALTERNATIVES
8.1 INTROPaCTION
This section provides a concise description of how each alternative would
address the site from Initiation of the remedy to completion of site
activities. Remediation of the contaminated soils, burn pit residuals,
sediments, and sludges will addressed.
Applicable technologies are those techniques that may have significant
beneficial site effects. Table 8-1 identifies all the potential alternatives
evaluated in the preliminary screening of technologies. Table 8-2 represents
those alternatives retained for in-depth analyses. Alternatives for detailed
evaluation were selected to represent a range of remedial actions based
upon: overall protectiveness of human health and the environment,
cost-effectiveness, the use of permanent solutions and alternative treatment
technologies to the maximum extent practicable, and treatment that reduces
toxicity, mobility, or volume as a principal element. .All alternatives
considered will meet ARARs or meet the conditions for an ARARs waiver. The
no action alternative is retained whether or not it attains ARARs, as ,
proscribed by SARA, to provide a baseline for comparison of alternatives.
The list of alternatives for detailed evaluation is shown in Table 8-3.
In the evaluation, efforts have been made to identify and quantify potential
factors that may affect the scope and cost of each alternative. For factors
-------
13
Table 8-1
Preliminary Screening of Remedial Technologies
SOURCE REMEDIATION" TECHNOLOGIES C
>• •'
Remedial Technology p
o Capping
o Grading
o Revegetation
o Surface vater diversion
and collection
o Leaching
o Air stripping/vacuum
extraction
o Excavation and removal X
o Thermal destruction X
o Vet air oxidation . X
o-In-sltu treatment X
s
o Composting X
o Land application
o Liquid biological
treatment
o Solidification/fixation
x
No significant beneficial site
effects
No significant beneficial site
effects
No significant beneficial site
effects
No significant beneficial site
effects
SRT-lov contaminant area
remediation
No significant beneficial site
effects
PRT-source remediation
PRT-source remediation
SRT-source remediation
PRT-soil remediation
PRT-sourc; remediation
No sign: '-sat beneficial site
effects
PRT-scurzs ramedia^-lon
SRT-:
'residual remediation
(!) 5
P
N7
FRT
SSI
c^r:3 - GRU, burn pit and plastic chip-
- Psasible for this site
- Not Feasible for this site
- Primary Remedial Technology
- .Supplemental Remedial Technology
-------
14
Table 8-1
(continued)
Preliminary Screening of Remedial Technologies
SEDIKENTS REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES
Remedial Technology P
o Capping
o Vet air oxidation
o Thermal destruction X
o Land application X
o Composting X
o Solidification/Fixation X
o Air stripping
o Excavation/disposal X
NF Commen ts
X No significant beneficial site
effects
X No significant remediation
PRT-source remediation
SRT-source remediation
PRT-source remediation
SRT-source remediation
X No significant beneficial site
effects
PRT-contaminant reduction
F - Feasible for this site
NF - Not Feasible for this site
PRT - Primary Remedial Technology
SRT - Supplemental Remedial Technology
.••5
-------
- 15 -
TABLE 8-2
Summary of Retained Technologies
Glycol Recovery Unit Sludges
Primary Remedial
Technoloqiea
Excavation and Removal off-site
Thermal Destruction
wet Air Oxidation with Effluent Treatment
Composting
Liquid Biological treatment
On-Site Landfill
Supplemental
Technologies
Leaching
On-site treatment
Solidification/Excavation
Activated Carbon
Air Stripping
Filtration
Burn Pit Residuals, Stream Sediments and Plastic Chips
Primary Remedial Technologies
Excavation and Removal off-site
Solidification/Fixation
On-site Landfill
-------
- 16 -
3
'4
5
6
7
8
Table 8-3
for
No Action
On-site Rotary Kiln Incineration with
Off-site Disposal of Residuals
Incineration Off-site
On-Bite Incineration with Chemical Fixation
of Residuals
Wet Air Oxidation wtih Bffluent Treatment
Composting- Static Pile Method
Composting- Windrow Method
Off-site Landfill Disposal
-------
N/A
NO - NOT DETECTED
• • SEDIMENT AND SURFACE
•*ATER SAMPLING LOCATION
DARKER STREAM SEGMENTS
INDICATE THOSE
REQUIRING REMEDIATION
FIGURE 8-1
-1 SEDIMENTS REQUIRING REMEDIATION
-------
- - A / -
that cannot presently be quantified/ assumptions will be presented.
The following are discussed for each alternative:
o engineering considerations
o operation and maintenance
o monitoring
o off-site disposal, permits and transportation
o health and safety
o cost estimates
8.2 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
8.2.1 COMMON REMEDIAL COMPONENT DISCUSSION
Excavation and Reqradinq
Excavation of contaminant mass and contaminated soils is required for all
remedial alternatives discussed, since no in-situ alternatives passed the
initial screen. Based on the findings of the expanded characterization
study, it was determined that excavation for the site should be by front-end
loaders, backhoes or bulldozers. It is assumed that GRU, burn pit residuals,
plastic chips and stream sediments will be excavated using this technology.
The volume of excavated material is assumed to be 1800, 1200, 600 and 110
cubic yards, respectively, for a total estimated volume of 3710 cubic yards.
Following excavation, the site would be backfilled and regraded to promote
drainage. The regrading operation would be accomplished by bulldozers or
graders.
Based on the extensive sampling conducted during the expanded site
characterization study a great deal is known about the materials disposed of
in the source area. The GRU sludges, burn pit residues, and plastic chips
are all highly visible and easily identified by visual inspection. For
treatment purposes material will be excavated to the waste-soil interface and
to a depth of at least an additional two feet until no visible contamination
remains. This should significantly reduce concentrations of indicator
chemicals leaching to groundwater. Residual contamination is anticipated to
be minimal and any leaching to groundwater will be mitigated by the Operable
Unit One puap and treat system.
Contaminated stream sediments were identified in the RI and FS for the first
operable unit. Stream sediment remediation would be needed for each of the
remedial alternatives except the No Action Alternative. The area north of
the wastewater treatment pond is contaminated with some HSL organics (Figure
8-1). The RI found stream sediment contamination in samples representing
depths of about 2 to 4 inches. It is assumed that stream segments
highlighted on the figure will be excavated to a depth of 6 inches for the
purpose of cost estimating. The volume of sediment needing remediation is
estimated at 110 cubic yards. '•
-------
- 19 -
Plastic Chip and Burn Pit Residual
Plastic chip and burn pit residuals are disposed in the same area as, and in
some location*, co-disposed with the CRO waste. Remediation of the plastic
chip and burn pit residuals would be needed for each alternative except No
Action. The chip and burn pit residuals have lower organic content and
thermal value than the GRO sludges (not a factor for composting alternatives)
and are planned for segregation and processing separately from the GRD
material for thermal treatment alternatives. Baaed on the characterization
study, it is estimated that there are about 600 cy of plastic chips and 1200
cy of burn pit residuals for treatment or disposal.
Stream Sediment. Plastic Chip and Burn Pit Residuals
The stream sediments, plastic chips and burn pit residuals are discrete
units/material types which have total ESL organic loadings of less than 1 to
about 24 mg/kg where analyzed, and BTU values generally less than 2000
BTU/lb. A technical need to thermally treat these material has not been
identified, and they are not technically amenable to the treatment processes
evaluated. For thermal treatment alternatives costing purposes, disposal of
these materials off-site at a fully RCRA-compliant secure landfill is
assumed. The off-site disposal cost is included in cost analyses for all
alternatives except Alternative 4 listed in Table 8-3. Alternative 4
considers fixation and on-site landfilling for the stream sediments, plastic
chip and burn pit residuals.
8.2.2 ON-SITE ROTARY KILN INCINERATION WITH OFF-SITB DISPOSAL OF RBSIDOALS
Description
This alternative requires source excavation and replacement with clean fill;
the installation on-site of a rotary kiln incinerator to treat the GRO
sludges; and the off-site disposal of the stream sediments, plastic chips and
burn pit residuals as discussed under "Common Remedial Component Discussion".
Rotary kiln incinerators are cylindrical, refractory-lined shells, capable of
handling a wide variety of solid and liquid wastes. They are fueled by
natural gas, oil or pulverized coal. Most of the heating of the waste is du«
to heat transfer between the combustion product gasses and the walls of the
kiln. The basic type of rotary kiln incinerator consists of the kiln and an
afterburner.
Hastes are injected into the kiln at the higher end and are passed through
the combustion con* as the kiln rotates. The rotation mixes the waste with
combustion ga«es, thereby improving destruction of organic materials. Rotary
kilns often employ afterburners to ensure complete combustion. Most rotary
kilns are equipped with wet scrubber emission controls.
The residence time and temperature depend upon combustion characteristics of
the waste. Residence times can range from a few seconds to an hour or more
for bulk solids. Combustion temperatures range from 1500° to 3000°?.
»
Rotary kilns are capable of burning waste in any physical form. They can
incinerate solids and liquids independently, or in combination, and can
accept waste feed without any preparation. Hazardous wastes which have been
treated in rotary kilns include PCBs, tars, obsolete munitions, polyvinyl
chloride wastes and bottoms from solvent reclamation operations.
-------
Because of ability to handle waste in any physical form and high waste
destruction efficiency/ rotary kilns are a preferred method for treating
mixed hazardous solid residues.
The limitationa of rotary kilns include susceptibility to thermal shock, the
necessity for very careful maintenance, need for additional air due to
leakage, high particulate loadings, relatively low thermal efficiency and a
high capital cost for installation.
Overall Protection of Human Health and the Environment
Removal of contaminated soils and replacement with clean fill would
substantially reduce or eliminate risk posed by dermal, inhalation, and
ingestion exposure to source material at the site.
Removal of the source material would also remove contaminants which could be
released to the groundwater. This would alleviate future groundwater
contamination.
Incineration of CRD sludges destroys contaminants, eliminating a principal
threat. Disposal in a RCRA Subtitle C facility of the ash and the remaining
contaminated materials substantially reduces risk posed by dermal,
inhalation, and ingestion exposure.
Compliance with ARARs
This alternative complies with ARARs.
The GRO sludges would be treated on-site in accordance with RCRA 40 C.F.R.
Subpart O which applies to the mobilization, operation, and closing of
thermal destruction units. These requirements, though not applicable, have
been determined to be relevant and appropriate due to the similarity of the
wastes being managed and the actions being taken. Specific operating
practices necessary to meet the performance objectives would be determined
through a trial burn at the site after the installation of the rotary kiln.
Permits are not required for on-site remedial actions at Superfund sites;
however, any on-site action must meet the substantive technical requirements
of the permit process. This alternative would comply with the Clean Air Act
40 CFR Part 50 concerning particulates and volatile* emissions during
excavation.
The substances transported off-site for disposal in a RCRA Subtitle C
facility are,, not RCRA listed or RCRA characteristic wastes. Landban is not
ARAR. Until the «PA rule-making is completed, the CXRCLA program will not
consider T-JUMII^M to be relevant and appropriate to soil and debris that does
not contain RCRA restricted wastes.
Facilities used for off-site disposal are required by CXRCLA Section 121 (5)
to be in compliance with all pertinent RCRA requirements, that is, to have a
RCRA permit or interim status and have an on-going corrective action for any
-------
- ------- " - 21 -
SWMU (Solid Waste Management Dnit) releases (The Super fund Off-site Policy
provides guidance on meeting this requirement ) .
To Be Considered
The State of Worth Carolina has proposed North Carolina Air Toxic Regulations
as listed in the North Carolina Administrative Code. Title 15, Chapter 2,
Subchapter 20. These will be promulgated in the fall of 1989. If these are
more stringent than Federal standards these will apply to the remedial
action.
Long-term Effectiveness and Permanence
Incineration of the GRO sludges permanently destroys the organic
contaminants. Residuals and non-GRO contaminated materials' disposal at a
RCRA Subtitle C facility is less permanent, since facility containment
structures are subject to failure. No contaminants will remain on-site above
health-based levels after the groundwater remediation (OP #1) is completed.
Reduction of Toxicity, Mobility, or Volume
The primary source materials will be destroyed by incineration, eliminating
toxicity. Nobility and volume are not considered to be reduced by off-site
containment; these effects can only be produced by treatment.
Short Term Effectiveness
Excavation of contaminated materials may increase the risk of inhalation,
dermal contact, and ingest ion exposure during implementation. Incinerator
emissions may have potential short term impacts. Off-site transportation of
stream sediments and burn pit residuals may increase short term risk* to
populations along the transport route.
Implement* ^i
Incineration is a proven technology. This alternative would require a rotary
kiln incinerator installed on-site. Hastes would be fed into the incinerator
at a rate to provide a sufficient retention time for complete combustion.
This alternative would require a test burn prior to full-scale operation.
Air monitoring and analysis equipment would monitor scrubber effluent, solids
residue, combustion gasses, system pressure and temperature and air flow
rates.
State und
The primary issue is public concern about incinerator emissions.
Cost Effectiveness
The cost estimate for this alternative is approximately $3.7 million. A
complete breakdown on the cost estimate can be found In Appendix 12 of the
Feasibility Study Report.
-------
- 22 -
8.2.3 INCINERATION OFF-SITE
Description
Thia alternative requires the excavation of source material and transport of
the GRO material to an off-site incinerator. Contaminated materials would be
replaced with clean fill. The non-GRO material would be landfilled off-site .
as discussed in Section 8.2.1.
Overall Protection of Human Health and the Environment
This alternative is a permanent action for destruction of the GRU source
material.
Removal of contaminated material and replacement with clean fill would
substantially reduce or eliminate on-site exposure and risk posed by source
materials.
Removal of the source material would also remove contaminants which could be
released to the groundwater. This would alleviate future groundwater
contamination.
Disposal in a RCRA Subtitle C facility of the non-GRO source materials
substantially reduces risk posed by dermal, inhalation, and ingestion
exposure.
Compliance with ARARs
This alternative complies with ARARs.
The substances transported off-site for disposal in a RCRA Subtitle C
facility are not RCRA listed or RCRA characteristic wastes. RCRA Landban 40
C.F.R. 268 is not applicable. A Relevant and Appropriate determination is
not performed for remedial alternatives which involve off-site actions.
The GRD sludges would be incinerated off-site in accordance with RCRA 40
C.F.R. Subpart O at a fully-permitted facility. Facilities used for off-site
disposal or treatment are required by CBRCLA Section 121 (5) to be in
compliance with all pertinent RCRA requirement*, that is, to have a RCRA
permit or interim status and have an on-going corrective action for any SHOT
(Solid Haste Management Doit) releases (The Superfund Off-site Policy
provides guidance on meeting this requirement).
This alternative would comply with the Clean Air Act 40 CFR Part 50
concerning particulates and volatile* emissions during excavation.
To Be Considered
The State of North Carolina has proposed North Carolina Air Toxic Regulations
as listed in the North Carolina Administrative Code, Title 15, Chapter 2,
Subchapter 20. These will be promulgated in the fall of 1989. If these are
more stringent than Federal Standards these will apply, to the remedial
action.
-------
- 23 -
Long-term Effectiveness and Permanence
This alternative would have the same long-term effectiveness as Alternative
8.2.2, and would provide the same degree of permanence.
Reduction of Toxicitv. Mobility, or Volume
This alternative would provide the same degree of reduction of toxicity,
mobility, or volume as Alternative 8.2.2.
Short Term Effectiveness
This alternative provides the same short term effectiveness as Alternative
8.2.2, except that transportation off-site of GRD sludge materials involves
more risk than off-site transportation of other contaminated materials due to
the higher concentrations of carcinogens and toxic chemicals.
Implementabilitv
This alternative would use proven technology. Haste disposal rate for the
GRD sludges would be dependent on the capacity of the off-site incinerator.
Ose of a licensed off-site incinerator would be required. The availability
of a local (South Carolina) incineration facility is an issue since South
Carolina has been increasingly resistant to accepting out-of -state waste*.
Cost Effectiveness
The total cost of off-site incineration is dependent on the cost of
incineration and the transportation charges. Quotation* obtained for the
Feasibility Study range from $600 to $1500/ton. Assuming SlOOO/ton, this
alternative cost* $3.9 million. A breakdown of the cost* are contained in
Appendix XX of the Feasibility study Report.
State and Community Acceptance
The primary issue nay be public concern over potential spill* while
transporting the waste through their community.
8.2.4 ON-SITB ROTARY KILN INCINERATION WITH gnmtTOi, FIXATION OF RESIDUALS
Description
This alternative would entail the excavation of source material, incineration
of the GRO material, chemical fixation of the ash and non-CRO source
material, cad replacement of the fixed material on-*ite. Clean fill would be
brought la to rector* the cite to natural grade*.
Overall Protection of Human Health and the Environment
This alternative would permanently destroy ORB sludge contaminants and would
remove or minimize the potential risks associated with the material to be
chemically fixed. Dermal, ingestion, and inhalation contact with cite
contaminant* would be eliminated, and risks posed by -continued groundwater
contamination would be reduced.
-------
Compliance with ARARs
This alternative complies with ARARs.
Based upon the land disposal restriction (Landban) and in accordance with 40
C.F.R. Part 26, RCRA listed or characteristic wastes which are excavated,
treated, and then redeposited in the same unit of contamination constitutes
placement, and therefore Landban is potentially an ARAR.
The GRO sludges would be treated on-site in accordance with RCRA 40 C.F.R.
Subpart O which applies to the mobilization, operation, and closing of
thermal destruction units. These requirements, though not applicable, have
been determined to be relevant and appropriate due to the similarity of the
wastes being managed and the actions being taken. Specific operating
practices necessary to meet the performance objectives would be determined
through a trial burn at the site after the installation of the rotary kiln.
Permits are not required for on-site remedial actions at Superfund sites;
however, any on-site action must meet the substantive technical requirements
of the permit process. This alternative would comply with the Clean Air Act
40 CFR Part 50 concerning particulates and volatilea emissions during
excavation.
The chemical fixation treatment process would occur on-site.
Because fixation would result in a volume increase, and would occupy a larger
area of the site, any lateral extension of the waste disposal area would
require that the entire disposal area comply wtih RCRA 40 C.F.R. 264.228 and
40 C.F.R. 264.221, which are relevant and appropriate. Vertical extensions
of the waste monolith do not create a new waste management area, so 40 C.F.R.
264.228 and 264.221 are not ARAR in this case.
The fixed material is not hazardous as defined by RCRA since contaminants are
bound in the matrix and will not leach. The wastes undergoing fixation are
not RCRA listed or characteristic wastes, and therefore Landban is not
applicable. These materials are not similar to a RCRA hazardous waste, so
Landban is not relevant and appropriate.
To Be Considered
The State of North Carolina has proposed North Carolina Air Toxic Regulations
as listed in the North 7|*7"1
-------
Fixation of the incinerator ash and non-CRO source materials may provide good
long-term effectiveness and permanence. Long-term performance data for this
technology in applications involving organic chemicals is not available;
however, simulation data predict good long-term effectiveness and
permanence. . Mo contaminants will remain on-site above health-based levels
after the groundwater remediation (OO II) is completed.
Reduction of Toxicitv, Mobility, or Volume
GR0 sludge contamination is permanently destroyed in the incineration process
and the volume substantially reduced. Mobility of contaminants in the ash
and non-GRU source materials is reduced significantly by the chemical
fixation process. The volume of solidification materials increases due to
the additional volume of the admixture formulation.
Short Term Effectiveness
Excavation of contaminated materials and the mixing for the fixation process
may increase the risk of inhalation, dermal contact, and ingestion exposure
during implementation. Incineration emissions may have potential short term
impacts.
Implementabilitv
Incineration is a proven technology. Solidification and chemical fixation
have been shown to be effective for incineration ash. Additional bench-scale
or pilot testing may be required to optimize the admixture formulation.
Cost Effectiveness
The cost estimate for this alternative is about $3.5 million. A complete
breakdown of the cost estimate can be found in Appendix IX of the Feasibility
Study Report.
State and Community Acceptance
The primary issue is public concern over incinerator emissions.
8.2.5 WET AIR OXIDATION WITH EFFLOBNT TRBATMSHT
Description
Wet air oxidation refer* to the aqueous phase oxidation of dissolved or
suspended organic materials. Oxidation occurs in an aqueous environment at
temperature* ranging from 350*r to 680*7. This relatively low temperature
oxidation can be accomplished due to the catalytic effect of the water and
the high solubility and diffusiveness of oxygen in water at these
temperatures. The water also serves to moderate the rate of oxidation by
removing excess beat through evaporation. In order to prevent all of the
water from evaporating, the process must be operated at pressure of 300 to
3,000 psig (pounds per square inch gage).
-------
- 26 -
The oxygen required by the wet air oxidation process is provided by an
oxygen-containing gas, usually air, bubbled through the wastewater, thus the
term "Wet Air Oxidation."
Preheated alr-wastewater mixture enters the reactor vessel where the oxygen
present in the air reacts with the organic materials present in the
wastewater. During oxidation of the organics, exothermic heat is released
and raises the temperature of the reactor contents.
The oxidation products are primarily carbon dioxide, water and short chain
organic acids. Sulfur and amino compound are converted to sulfate and
ammonia, respectively, and the exhaust gassea contain no sulfur or nitrogen
oxides.
The wet air oxidation unit produces two side streams; on off gas stream
consisting of carbon dioxide, water vapor and trace organics and an oxidized
slurry stream. The off gas stream requires water scrubbing. The oxidized
slurry stream contains suspended solids and requires settling. Following the
wet air oxidation unit, a clarifier or filtration system would be installed
for removal of the solids. Sizing of the clarifier or filter and
conditioning requirements would have to be determined from solids settling
tests. Non GRO source material will be disposed of off site in a RCRA
Subtitle C facility.
Overall Protection of Human Health and the Environment
Removal of contaminated materials and replacement with clean fill would
substantially reduce or eliminate risk posed by potential dermal, inhalation
and ingestion exposure. Removal of the source material would also alleviate
future groundwater contamination by eliminating a source for continuing
contamination.
Compliance with ARARs
This alternative would comply with ARARs.
The GRU sludges would be treated on-site in accordance with RCRA 40 C.T.R.
Subpart o which applies to the mobilization, operation, and closing of
thermal destruction units. These requirements, though not applicable, have
been determined to be relevant and appropriate due to the similarity of the
wastes being managed and the actions taken. Specific operating practices
necessary to.jwet the performance objectives would be determined through a
trial burn «t the site after installation of the wet air oxidation unit.
Permits are not required for on-site remedial actions at Superfund sites/
however, any on-site action must meet the substantive technical requirements
of the permit process. This alternative would comply with the Clean Air Act
40 CFR Part 50 concerning participates and volatiles emissions during
excavation.
The substances transported off-site for disposal in a RCRA Subtitle C
facility are not RCRA listed or RCRA characteristic wastes. Landban is not
ARAR. Until the EPA rule-making is completed, the CBRCLA program will not
consider Landban to be relevant and appropriate to soil and debris thattdoes
not contain RCRA restricted wastes.
-------
- 27 -
Facilities used for off-Bite disposal are required by CERCLA Section 121 (5)
to be in compliance with all pertinent RCRA requirements, that is, to have a
RCRA permit or interim status and have an on-going corrective action for any
SWMU (Solid Waste Management Onit) releases (The Superfund Off-site Policy
provides guidance on meeting this requirement).
To Be Considered
The State of North Carolina has proposed North Carolina Air Toxic Regulations
as listed in the North Carolina Administrative Code. Title 15, Chapter 2,
Subchapter 2O. These will be promulgated in the fall of 1989. If these are
more stringent than Federal Standards these will apply to the remedial
action.
Long-term Effectiveness and Permanence
Wet air oxidation permanently destroys the organic contaminants. Residuals
and non-GRD contaminated materials' disposal at a RCRA Subtitle C facility is
less permanent, since facility containment structures are subject to
failure. No contaminants will remain on-site above health-based levels after
the groundwater remediation (OU II) is completed.
Reduction of Toxieitv. Mobility, and Volume
The GRD sludge materials will be permanently destroyed.
Mobility and volume are not considered to be reduced by off-site containment;
these effects can only be reduced by treatment.
Short-Term Effectiveness
Excavation of contaminated materials may increase the risk of inhalation,
dermal contact, and ingestion exposure during implementation. Incinerator
emissions may have potential short term impacts. Off-site transportation of
stream sediments and burn pit residuals may increase short term risks to
populations along the transport route.
Short term risks are also introduced in the additional treatment required for
the effluent.
Implementabilitv
This alternative is feasible for use. For fee purposes, the GRO wastes must
be diluted prior to treatment using wet air oxidation. Unlike the
incineration alternatives, this alternative produces substantial effluent
that requires further treatment.
State and Cofn*|iunitv Acceptance
This alternative will probably have more public acceptance than incineration
on-site since it is a closed system treatment process and uses common
technologies for final effluent treatment.
-------
- 28 -
Coat Effectiveness
The coat of wet air oxidation and treatment system for the effluent is
approximately $6.4 million. A cost breakdown is provided in Appendix IX of
the Feasibility Study report.
Wet air oxidation is typically more costly than incineration for liquid
wastes and sludges. Cost effectiveness is poor since the substantial waste
streams produced require the further treatment and are less desirable than
the destruction of contaminants and subsequent disposal of incinerator ash
afforded by incineration options.
8.2.6 COMPOSTING- STATIC PILg METHOD
Description
Contaminated source material would be removed and replaced with clean fill.
This alternative considers composting of the GRO materials and off-site -
disposal of the stream sediments, plastic chips and burn pit residuals as
discussed in Section 8.2.1. Composting is the microbial degradation of the
waste by aerobic metabolism using static piles or windrows. In this
alternative, the GRO sludge is converted to compost in the four-step process
of preparation, digestion, drying and curing using the Static Pile Method.
Initially, the GRO sludge is mixed with a bulking material such as wood chips
or leaves to facilitate handling, to provide the necessary structure and
porosity for aeration, and to lower the moisture content of the biomass to 60
percent or less. Nutrients are added as needed. Following mixing, the
aerated pile is constructed and positioned over porous pipe through which air
is drawn or blown. The pile is covered for insulation. Air monitoring
during the mixing process will assure that volatile organics are not released
above safe levels.
The aeration pile undergoes decomposition by thermophilic organisms, whose
activity generates concomitant elevation in temperature to 60*C (140*P) or
more. Aerobic composting conditions are maintained by drawing air through
the pile at a predetermined rate. The effluent air stream is conducted in to
a small pile of screened/ cured compost where odorous gasses are effectively
absorbed. Air monitoring will assure that VOCs are not released at
unacceptable levels. After about 21 days, the composting rates and
temperature*" decline, and the pile is taken down, the plastic pipe is
discarded, sad the compost is either dried or cured depending upon weather
conditions. Drying to 40 to 45 percent moisture facilitates clean separation
of compost from wood chips. The unscreened compost is spread out with a
front end loader to a depth of 12 inches. Periodically a tractor-drawn
harrow is employed to facilitate drying. Screening is performed with a
rotary screen. The chips are recyclable.
The compost is stored in piles for about 30 days to assure no offensive odors
remain to complete stabilization. The compost is then ready for utilization
as a low-grade fertilizer, a soil amendment, or for land reclamation.
-------
- 29 -
To limit the possibility of degradation of the aquifer and surrounding
streams, leacbate and runoff will be diverted to a collection pond for
subsequent treatment and disposal.
Overall Protection of Human Health and the environment
Removal of contaminated source material and replacement with clean fill would
substantially reduce or eliminate exposure and risk posed by exposure to
hazardous compounds.
In addition to decreasing risks posed by potential dermal, inhalation and
ingestion exposure, removal of the source material would also address future
groundwater contamination by eliminating a source contamination.
Compliance with ARARs
Air monitoring during mixing and aerating of the compost will prevent
releases in accordance with the substantive technical requirements of the
Clean Air Act 40 CFR Part 50 concerning particulates and volatiles emissions
during excavation and remediation activities.
To Be Considered
The State of North Carolina has proposed North Carolina Air Toxic Regulations
as listed in the North Carolina Administrative Code. Title IS, Chapter 2,
Subchapter 20. These will be promulgated in the fall of 1989. If these are
more stringent than Federal Standards these will apply to the remedial
action.
Long-term Effectiveness and Permanence
The static pile method of composting permanently destroys the organic
contaminants. Residuals and non-GRO contaminated materials' disposal at a
RCRA Subtitle C facility is less permanent, since facility containment
structures are subject to failure. No contaminants will remain on-site above
health-based levels after the groundwater remediation (OO fl) is completed.
Reduction of Toxieitv. Mobility, and Volume
Contaminant* in the QR0 sludges will be destroyed.
mobility and volume are not considered to be reduced by off-site containment;
:hese effect* can only be achieved by treatment.
ihort-Term Effectiveness
he alternative poses significant short term risk due to exposure from
nhalation of contaminants since extensive aeration of contaminated soil is
nvolved in implementation. The risk would persist until the remedial action
i complete.
aplamentability
*
oposting is a proven technology for municipal sludge; however, its use for
zardous or industrial waste remediation is limited. Bench scale test
suits are favorable. Pilot testing is recommended to fully evaluate this
-------
- 30 -
technology. Institutional issues associated with this alternative are
disposition of residuals and possibility of contaminated leachate generation
during processing and after reburial.
State and Community Acceptance
This option may have more public acceptance than incineration since it
provides for on-eite treatment and uses a technology familiar to the people.
Cost Effectiveness
The estimated cost of this alternative, including leachate collection and
treatment, is approximately $3.2 million. A cost breakdown is provided in
Appendix XX of the Feasibility Study report.
fl.2.7 COMPOSTING- WINDROW METHOD
Description
This alternative considers composting of the GRU material and off-site
disposal of the stream sediments, plastic chip and burn pit residuals as
discussed in Section 8.2.1.
Composting is the microbial degradation of the waste material by aerobic
metabolism in piles or windrows on a surfaced outdoor area. In this
alternative, the windrow method is considered.
The windrows are turned periodically to provide oxygen for the microorganisms
to carry out the stabilization and to carry off the excess heat that is
generated by the process. Nutrients and water are added as needed.
The composting period is characterized by rapid decomposition of the waste
with air being supplied by periodic turnings of the windrows. The reaction
is exothermic, and wastes reach temperatures of 140*P to 160*7 or higher.
The period of digestion is normally about 6 weeks. This is characterized by
a slowing of the decomposition rate, the temperature drops back to ambient,
and the process is brought to completion.
After the decomposition is completed, the composting operations are similar
to those described for the static pile method in Section 8.2.6.
Overall Protection of Human Health and the environment
This alternative is a permanent remedial action for source material.
Contaminated source material would be removed and replaced with
uncontaminated fill. The GRO material would be treated via composting, and
the non-GRO source material would be disposed of off-site. Removal of
contaminated source material and replacement with uncontaminated fill would
substantially reduce or eliminate exposure and risk posed by exposure to
hazardous compounds. Risks due to soil exposure would be those due to the
background concentrations of chemicals present in the upcontaminated fill.
-------
In addition to decreasing risks posed by potential dermal, inhalation and
ingestion .exposure, removal of the source material would also remove
contaminants which could be released to the groundwater. This would address
future groundwater contamination by eliminating a source for continuing
contamination.
Compliance with ARARs
Air monitoring during mixing and aerating of the compost will prevent
releases in accordance with the substantive technical requirements of the
Clean Air Act 40 CFR Part 50 concerning particulates and volatiles emissions
during excavation and remediation activities.
To Be Considered
The State of North Carolina has proposed North Carolina Air Toxic Regulations
as listed in the North Carolina Administrative Code. Title 15, Chapter 2,
Subchapter 20. These will be promulgated in the fall of 1989. If these are
more stringent than Federal Standards these will apply to the remedial
action.
Long-term Effectiveness and Permanence
The windrow method of composting permanently destroys the organic
contaminants. Residuals and non-GRO contaminated materials' disposal at a
RCRA Subtitle C facility is less permanent, since facility containment
structures are subject to failure. No containments will remain on-site above
health-based levels after the groundwater remediation (OO #1) is completed.
Reduction of Toxicitv. Mobility an**
Contaminants in the GRD sludges will be destroyed.
Mobility and volume are not considered to be reduced by off-site containment;
these effects can only be achieved by treatment.
Short-term effectiveness
The alternative poses significant short term risk due to exposure from
inhalation of contaminants since extensive aeration of contaminated soil is
involved in implementation. The risk would persist until the remedial action
is complete.
Implementabilitv
Composting is a proven technology for municipal sludge; however, its use for
hazardous or industrial waste remediation is limited. Bench scale test
results are favorable. Pilot testing is recommended to fully evaluate this
technology.
Institutional issues associated with this alternative are disposition of
residuals and possibility of contaminated leachate generation during
processing and after reburial.
-------
- 32 -
Community Acceptance
This alternative may have more public acceptance than incineration since it
provides for on-site treatment and uses technology familiar to people.
Cost Effectiveness
The estimated coat of this alternative, including leachate collection and
treatment, is approximately $3.4 million. A cost breakdown is provided in
Appendix IX of the Feasibility Study report.
8.2.8 OFF-SITE LANDFILL DISPOSAL
Disposal
This alternative would entail excavation of contaminant mass and contaminated
soils, replacement with clean fill and regrading, and transport of source
material to a fully RCRA-compliant secure landfill.
Overall Protection of Human Health and the Environment
Removal of source material and replacement with clean fill would
substantially reduce or eliminate exposure and risk posed by exposure to
hazardous compounds.
In addition to decreasing risks posed by potential dermal, inhalation and
ingestion exposure, removal of the source material would also remove
contaminants which could be released to the groundwater. This would address
future groundwater contamination by eliminating a source for continuing
contamination.
Compliance with ARARs
This alternative would comply with ARARs.
The substances transported off-site for disposal in • RCRA Subtitle C
facility are not RCRA listed or RCRA characteristic wastes. Landban is not
ARAR. Until the «PA rule-making is completed, the CXRCLA program will not
consider T-^r^fr*" to be relevant and appropriate to soil and debris that does
not contain RCRA restricted wastes.
Facilities u*ed for off-site disposal are required by CXRCLA Section 121 (S)
to be in compliance with all pertinent RCRA requirements, that is, to have a
RCRA permit or interim status and have an on-going corrective action for any
SWOT (Solid Waste Management Unit) releases (The Superfund Off-site Policy
provides guidance on meeting this requirement).
Long-term Effectiveness and Permanence
Disposal of contaminated material at a RCRA Subtitle C facility is not
permanent, since facility containment structures are subject to failure. No
contaminants will remain on-site above health-based levels after the ,
groundwater remediation (OO II) is completed.
-------
- 33 -
Reduction of Toxicitv. Mobility, and Volume
Toxicity, mobility and volume are not considered to be reduced by off-eite
containment; these effects can only be produced by treatment.
Short-Term effectiveness
This alternative provides the same short term effectiveness as Alternative
8.2.2, except the transportation off-site of GRO sludge materials involves
more risk than off-site transportation of other contaminated materials due to
the higher concentration of carcinogens and toxic chemicals.
Implementability
The implementability and feasibility of this alternative's components have
been discussed previously as being generally reliable and established
technologies.
State and Community Acceptance
The institutional issues with this alternative are whether the source
material is subject to the "Landban." This alternative does not treat the
source/ but moves it to another site. Hence, its acceptability is not as
great as an alternative which treats or destroys at least a portion of the
source.
Cost Effectiveness
The approximate cost of this alternative is $1.9 million. A cost breakdown
is included in Appendix IX of the Feasibility Study report.
9.0 SUMMARY OP COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OP ALTERNATIVES
Overall Protection of Hum<
Incineration provides for the best overall protection of human health and the
environment from hazardous constituents of the GRO wastes, since the
contaminants are destroyed. Off-site disposal of GRO wastes is protective of
human health and the environment since it eliminates the) potential for
exposure to the waste. Wet air oxidation provide* destruction of GRO
contaminants, but not to the same extent as incineration since waste streams
from the process require further treatment. Composting removes contamination
from the soil permanently and destroys some part of the contamination through
biological processes, but also transfers organic contaminants to the air
through aeration and mixing processes, which may represent a hazard.
composting is therefore less protective than wet air oxidation, landfilling,
or incineration options.
Chemical fixation is at least equally protective of human health and the
environment as off-site disposal of non-GRO wastes, since both eliminate
potential for exposure to the waste. Chemical fixation may be more
protective, since contaminants may actually be rendered non-hazardous. This
effect has not been confirmed for organic constituent!.
-------
- 34 -
Compliance with ARARs
All alternatives comply with ARARs. No alternative requires an ARAR waiver.
Long-term effectiveness and permanence
Incineration provides for the best long-term effectiveness and permanence
since the GRO wastes are destroyed. Wet air oxidation provides for
destruction of most of the GRO wastes, but subsequent process waste stream
treatment may be leas effective, therefore less permanent. Off-site disposal
of GRO wastes provides long-term effectiveness in isolating wastes, but
containment structures may be subject to failure, so that this alternative is
less permanent than incineration or wet air oxidation. Composting provides
for partial destruction of wastes, but also transfers contaminants to the
air, providing less effectiveness and less permanence in containing or
eliminating contaminants than other alternatives.
Chemical fixation provides good long-term effectiveness and may provide a
more permanent remedy than containment if the matrix is shown to permanently
alter the contaminants. Field data is not available; however, performance'
testing predicts good long-term effectiveness and permanence. Containment of
non-GRO wastes provides long-term effectiveness in Isolating wastes, but
containment structures may be subject to failure, potentially providing less
permanence.
Reduction of mobility, toxicitv, or volume
Incineration destroys the contaminants, thereby eliminating toxicity and
mobility, and reducing volume. Wet air oxidation also destroys the majority
of the contamination, but subsequent process stream treatment may or may not
result in reduction of toxicity, mobility, or volume. Composting provides
for partial destruction of contaminants, but increases mobility of the
contaminants through the air exposure pathway. Off-site disposal of GRO
wastes does not affect the inherent toxicity, mobility, or volume of the
waste.
Chemical fixation may alter the non-GRO waste contaminants, destroying
toxicity. It increases volume due to the additional volume of the admixture/
and it eliminates the mobility of the waste. Off-site disposal of GRO wastes
does not affect the inherent toxicity, mobility, or volume of the waste.
Short—term effectiveness
All alternatives require excavation of GRO wastes and have short-term impacts
on the environment due to the release of organic contaminants (VOCs) into the
air. Composting alternatives have greater air effects during implementation
since the waste is effectively undergoing aeration. The windrow alternative
would distribute emissions over a larger area as described, while the static
pile method may control release through absorption by the compost material
used as an air filter, or may result in a more concentrated release at the
aeration outlet. Incineration may have short-tern impacts due to
incineration emissions.
-------
- 35 -
Off-site disposal of GRD wastes or off-site incineration of these wastes
involves transportation of the waste, increasing short-term risk to
populations along the transport route.
Off-site disposal of non-GRO wastes involve transportation of the wastes,
also increasing short-term risk to populations along the transport route.
Chemical fixation of the wastes would have short-term risks due to potential
air emissions during the mixing process.
Implementabilitv
Incineration is a proven technology. On-site incineration is subject to
substantive but not to administrative requirements, and is fully
implementable. Off-site incineration may be difficult to implement due to
availability of incinerator capacity in South Carolina. Wet air oxidation
requires dilution of the GRO wastes to meet processing requirements, but is
fully implementable. Composting would require piloting prior to full
implementation. Off-site disposal of GRO or non-GRO wastes is implementable.
Chemical fixation is also implementable at the site for non-GRO wastes.
Cost-Effectiveness
Detailed estimated costs are as follows:
On-site Incineration w/Off-site Disposal
of Residuals and non-GRO Hastes S3.7M
Off-site Incineration and Off-site Disposal
of Residuals and non-GRO Hastes $3.9M
On-site Incineration and Chemical Fixation
of Residuals and non-GRO Hastes $3.5M
Het Air Oxidation w/Off-aite Disposal
of Residuals and non-GRO Hastes $6.4*
Composting-Static Pile Method S3.2M
Composting-Hindrow Method S3.4M
Off-site Landfill Disposal $1.9M
The wet air oxidation alternative does not provide the saae benefit as the
incineration options, yet is more expensive, so that it is not a
cost-effective alternative.
Off-site landfilling is the cheapest alternative, but does not provide for
treating the waste, and does not provide the benefits of other alternatives
in terms of protectiveness, long term effectiveness, or permanence. The
benefits provided by the other alternatives as compared to this containment
alternative Justify additional expenditure. Therefore off-site landfilling
is not the most cost-effective alternative.
-------
The composting alternatives are less expensive than the incineration
alternative* and provide similar benefit, but on a leaser scale. The pricing
of the composting alternatives have not included costs for air monitoring or
for emission control/ should that be necessary. The cost differential
between incineration, which assures maximum benefit, does not maJce composting
more cost-effective. The composting alternatives are less cost-effective
than the incineration alternatives.
The on-eite incineration with chemical fixation of residuals alternative is
the least expensive incineration alternative according to the FS cost
estimates; however, the incineration alternatives do not differ greatly in
cost. The on-site incineration and chemical fixation alternative is more
cost-effective than the other incineration alternatives primarily because it
provides much greater benefit for comparable cost. Long-term effectiveness,
permanence, and protectiveness are improved, short-term risks are reduced,
greater reduction of toxicity, mobility, and volume is achieved, and
implementability is greater than for off-site incineration.
State Acceptance
The State of North Carolina has concurred with the selected alternative.
Community Acceptance
Three citizens attended the public meeting. They voiced some concerns over
the selected remedy by were satisfied with the Agency's response. The only
written comments received by the Agency during the public comment period were
submitted by Hoechst-Celanese. These were addressed in the responsiveness
summary.
10.0 SELECTED REMEDY
The remedy selected for source control at the site is:
* Sxcavation of glycol recovery unit (GRD) sludges,
plastic chips, burn pit residuals and stream sediments.
* Incineration on-site of contaminated soil* and CRO
•ludges.
* Chemical fixation (solidificatioa) of incinerator ash,
plastic chips, burn pit residuals and stream sediments.
• On-site disposal of inert, solidified material.
• Regrading
* Monitoring
This remedy will attain a 106 cancer risk level as it removes the source of
the groundwater contamination. This risk level was established in the
Operable Unit One (groundwater remediation) ROD.
-------
-37-
11.0 STATPATORY DETERMINATIONS
The selected remedy satisfies the requirements of Section 121 of CBRCLA.
Protection of Human Health and the Environment
The selected remedy will permanently destroy 6RO sludge contamints and would
remove or minimize the potential risks associated with the material to be
chemically fixed. Dermal, ingestion, and inhalation contact with site
contaminants would be eliminated, and risks posed by continued groundwater
contamination would be reduced.
Attainment of ARARs
This, alternative will comply with ARARs.
The GRD sludges would be treated on-site in accordance with RCRA 40 C.P.R.
Subpart O which applies to the mobilization, operation, and closing of
thermal destruction units. These requirements, though not applicable, have
been determined to be relevant and appropriate due to the similarity of the
wastes being managed and the actions being taken. Specific operating
practices necessary to meet the performance objectives would be determined
through a trial burn at the site after the installation of the rotary kiln.
This alternative would comply with the substantive technical requirements of
the Clean Air Act 40 CPR Part 50 concerning particulates and volatiles
emissions during excavation.
Because fixation would result in a volume increase/ and would occupy a larger
area of the site, any lateral extension of the waste disposal area would
require that the entire disposal area comply wtih RCRA 40 C.P.R. 264.228 and
40 C.P.R. 264.221, which are relevant and appropriate. Vertical extensions
of thif waste monolith do not create a new waste management area, so 40 C.P.R.
264.228 and 264.221 are not ARAR in this case.
The State of North Carolina has proposed North Carolina Air Toxic Regulations
as listed in the North Carolina Administrative Code. Title 15, Chapter 2,
Subchapter 20 are to be considered. These will be promulgated in the fall of
1989 and therefore may be in place prior to initiation of the remedial
action. If these are sore stringent than Pederal Standards these will apply
to the remedial action.
Cost-Effectiveness
The on-site incineration and chemical fixation alternative is more
cost-effective than the other incineration alternatives primarily because it
provides much greater benefit for comparable cost. Long-term effectiveness,
permanence, and protectiveness are improved, short-term risk* are reduced,
greater reduction of toxicity, mobility, and volume is achieved, and
implementability is greater than for off-site incineration.
•>
Utilization of Permanent Solutions and Alternative Treatment Technologies or
Resource Recovery Technologies to the Maximum Extent Practicable •
The on-site incineration and chemical fixation alternative represents the
maximum extent to which permanent solutions and treatment can be practicably
-------
utilized for this action. Incineration will permanently destroy GRU sludge
contaminants. Solidification or chemical fixation have been shown to be more
permanent demobilization solutions than containment alone.
Preference for Treatment as a Principal Element
The preference for treatment is satisfied by the use of rotary kiln
incineration and chemical fixation at the site. The principal threats at the
site will be mitigated by use of these treatment technologies.
-------
ATTACHMENT
RESPONSIVENESS
SUMMARY
-------
Operations Site
Shelby, North Carolina
Responsiveness Summary
This community relations responsiveness summary is divided into the following
sect ions i
Section I: OVERVIEW. This section discusses EPA's preferred alternative
for remedial action and likely public reaction to this
alternative.
Section II:
Section III:
Section IV:
BACKGROUND ON COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT AND CONCERNS. This section
provides a brief history of community interest and concerns
raised during remedial activities at the Celanese Fibers
Operations site.
SUMMARY OP MAJOR COMMENTS RECEIVED PORING THE PUBLIC COMMENT
PERIOD AND THE EPA RESPONSES TO THE COMMENTS. Both the comment
and EPA's response are provided.
REMAINING CONCERNS. This section describee remaining community
concerns that EPA should be aware of in conducting the remedial
design and remedial action at the Celanese Site.
-------
- 2 -
I.OVERVIEW
At the time of the public meeting and the beginning of the public comment
period, SPA presented ita preferred alternative to the public. This
alternative specified in the Record of Decision (ROD) includes: on-site
incineration of the GRU sludges and contaminated soils; and
solidification of the incinerator ash, burn pit residuals, plastic chip,
and contaminated sediments. The solidified material will be disposed of
on-site.
The community favors remedial action though few citizens expressed a
preference for a particular process.
II.HISTORY OF COMMUNITY CONCERNS
Citizens of the Earl/Shelby area have expressed great interest in
activities relating to the Celanese Fibers Operations site. The citizens
of Earl, North Carolina, with the assistance of Diana Travis and other
staff members of the Clean Hater Fund of North Carolina, organized the
United Neighbors for Cleanup at Earl because of their concern about the
quality of water for their families. Las Brown, Conservation Chair of
the Broad River Sierra Group of Boiling Springs, has also expressed an
interest in the site. Many newspaper articles have been written by Donna
Clemmer of the Shelby Star concerning contamination at the site.
III.SUMMARY OF PUBLIC COMMENTS RECEIVED DPRING PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD AND
AGENCY RESPONSES
Comments raised during the February 16, 1989 Celanese Public Meeting are
summarized briefly below:
Jon Johnston, Chief of the EPA Region IV North Carolina/South Carolina
CBRCLA Unit, encouraged audience members to express any comments or
questions they had. Be stressed that the remedial alternative selected
for the site is proposed and not final. Be also stated that citizens
were welcomed to submit comments in writing or, if they wished to contact
EPA by telephone, EPA staff would save them the cost of a long-distance
phone call by taking their number and immediately returning the call.
The question* raised by one audience member related to the performance of
the incinerator and concern about air quality protection. These
question* and their accompanying responses are paraphrased below and
reported verbatim in the public meeting transcript.
Q/Comnent- I would like to know about the gases that the incinerator
will produce.
A- One of the things that XPA evaluates in any proposed
incineration project or one that we are implementing, is the
destruction and removal efficiency of that incinerator unit.
He do this through trial burns in which the incinerator has to
meet very stringent standards so that any gasses that are
-------
- 3 -
released are not toxic to the surrounding community. We are
talking about the demonstration of a removal efficiency of
99.9999 percent of any hazardous elements in the waste to be
incinerated, prior to actual on-line operation of the
incinerator. Your concern about the gaases is one that EPA
shares; we are very sensitive about making sure that we do not •
move a problem from one medium to another, for example, from
the soil to the air. We do believe that with careful operation
and monitoring of the incinerator, we can ensure that this will
not occur.
Q~ Whose regulations/standards are thoae?
A- Both EPA and State regulations for the destruction and removal
efficiency for the stack gasses that are emitted. You heard
the term ARARs, or applicable or relevant and appropriate
standards, mentioned earlier; in this case air emission
standards and destruction and removal efficiency are ARARs.
Comment- I thought North Carolina's air safety standards were
practically nonexistent.
A- We will follow the more stringent standard, in this case BPA's,
ae the applicable regulation.
Q- la there a problem with building an incinerator, or does it
have to be licenaed?
A- Issuance of a permit or license will not be necessary because
the proposed incinerator ia to be neither a commercial facility
which would accept off-aite waste, nor is it to be permanent.
Although it will not be handled as a permitting or licensing
action, the facility will, however, have to meet the technical
requirements of Federal and State regulations.
Comment- There ia ao much turmoil in North Carolina right now concerning
the siting of incinerators around the atate. Many counties are
rejecting them; they do not want incinerators aa economic
enterprises and here we are about to have a private one right
in our own community.
Response- We are well aware of North Carolina'a aituation and it ia one
that ia not unique to this atate. He do see a difference in
thie caae, however, between permitting a long-term, permitted,
commercial incinerator facility and a short-term incinerator to
deal with a specific problea for a specific tine. When the
problem ia resolved, the incinerator will be moved; it is a
mobile unit, not a dedicated facility.
The Congress has chosen to mandate that, wherever possible, EPA
ia to address problems created by Superfund aitea where thoae
problems are located. In other words, if, we can deal with them
on-aite, we are to do ao. Although we are aware of the concern
about incineration throughout North Carolina, we have been told
-------
- 4 -
clearly by the congress to deal with this problem in a
forthright manner on-aite if we can. Yours is the kind of
comment, however, that is appropriate for us to receive during
the public comment period and consider.
No other questions or comments were expressed at the meeting. For
further detail and clarification on all comments raised during the
meeting, interested persons can refer to the public meeting transcript.
The comment period on the Feasibility Study started on February 16, 1989
(the day of the public meeting) and closed on March 9, 1989. The only
comments received were from Hoechst Celanese on the Agency's preferred
alternative. It should be noted the preferred alternative was taken
directly from the draft Feasibility Study report developed by S & MB for
Celanese. The following comments are portions of the letter submitted by
Hoechst Celanese. The letter in its entirety is included as part of the
Administrative Record at the site. The major comments from the letter
are as follows:
1. Comment
S"ramarv
Based on the findings of the R2 Report and expanded Characterization
Study, it was determined that there were 1800 cubic yards of
GRO/dirt material, 1800 cubic yards of burn pit residues and soils/
and 110 cubic yards of stream sediments requiring remediation at our
site. The FS Report presented several remedial options to these
source materials, with incineration of the GRD material (the major
source of organic contamination) appearing to be the most amenable
approach to remediation. The FS, however, did not clearly depict
whether on-site or off-site was more viable. Because of this,
Hoechst Celanese began to closely examine on-site/off-site
incineration and requested budgetary estimates from several
hazardous material response and disposal operations. Based on this
examination, off-site incineration of the CRO/dirt material and
off-site landfilling of the burn pit residues, soils and stream
sediments are the most beneficial approaches to remediation at the
Hoechst Celanese - Shelby site.
Incineration of the GRD/dirt material is an amenable proven
technology and provides a permanent solution in that all organic
components are destroyed. Disposal of the burn pit residues, soils
and stream sediments at a secure hazardous waste landfill is
recommended as these materials are not technically amenable to
thermal treatment and the organic content is relatively low. More
importantly, the off-site disposal benefits over on-site are
believed to be critical to the timely and positive execution of this
-------
- 5 -
action. Theee benefits are: 1) timely start and completion, 2)
positive community acceptance/ 3) disposal occurs at an established
and proficient facility, 4) minimal delay causing variables, and 5)
it is more economical.
EPA Response
The Agency agrees incineration of the GRO/dirt material is the most
viable alternative. However, based on the analysis provided in this
ROD, the Agency believes on-site incineration with solidification of
the incinerator ash and other contaminated materials is the most
effective alternative for this site.
For purposes of discussion, each benefit identified in the company's
recommendation ia presented separately/ and the Agency's response
follows:
2. Timeliness; It is expected that off-site incineration and off-site
landfilling could be initiated within three months after the ROD is
approved. The only potential regulatory requirement is TSD State
approval/ and should present little problem based on the analyses of
the disposal materials. The time to complete the excavation and
ship all the source materials to off-site facilities would probably
be less than 6 to 12 months based on discussion* with TSD facilities
and hazardous material response operations.
The time frame for on-site incineration of the ORO/dirt material and
on-site fixation of the non-GRO materials and ash is much more
variable and could take up to 30 months to complete, assuming a
contract mobile incinerator is available for the site. It is
anticipated to take at least a year to mobilise an incinerator and
complete all permitting requirements/ including test burns and
analytical evaluation of the off-gasses. After the incineration
portion of the project is complete/ the ash and non-GRU materials
would have to be encapsulated using additional equipment brought
on-site; this would probably account for 5 to 6 months of the job
duration assuming extensive analytical evaluations are not required.
The timeliness of off-site incineration over on-site is in keeping
with the President's Superfund improvement program requesting faster
clean-ups of CXRCLA sites.
KPA Response* The time frame given for on-site incineration is
unrealistic. Some small quantity incinerators can be mobilized in
as little as two days. Incineration of the ORO sludges would take
approximately three months. The solidification of the ash and other
contaminated materials should require no more than a month including
mobilization. Solidification at another Superfund site required
only two months from mobilization to de-mobilization ia solidifying
more than 6/600 cubic yards of material. Considering this material
has been in place for approximately 30 years and the extraction
wells are situated in such a way as to intercept contaminants
-------
- 6 -
migrating from the source, timeliness in this context is not a
serious concern.
3. Neighborhood Impact; Because off-site remediation can be
accomplished much more quickly than on-aite, the community impact
with respect to possible air emissions, noise, and odors from the
excavated areas will be much less. The potential risk for
contaminant release due to off-site transportation accidents is
minimal considering the characteristics of the source materials and
the use of licensed hazardous waste transporters.
The noise associated with the on-site operation of an incinerator
would be 24 hours around the clock, as the operation cannot be
easily started and stopped. In addition, the reburying of
encapsulated residuals may not be perceived by the community as an
adequate elimination of the contamination source.
EPA Response; A public meeting was held in Shelby on February 16,
1989. Only three members of the local community attended. All the
feasible remedial alternatives were presented, and the Agency
presented a preferred alternative. These residents had only three
questions and appeared to be satisfied by the answers given by the
Agency. No written or verbal comments were submitted by anyone but
the company. The Agency, therefore, feels that the public has no
objection to the on-site incineration alternative. The Agency will,
however, make every effort to minimize any potential nuisance or
impact to the local community.
4. Efficiency and Effectiveness of Commercial Disposal Facilities;
Commercial RCRA incinerators blend a variety of waste materials
along with supplementary fuels to assure a consistent feed to the
unit. With a mobile incinerator, the incoming wastes would be
expected to be much more variable, particularly when burning
GRU/dirt mixtures, thus requiring much greater expertise and
attention to achieve the required destruction efficiency. Also,
off-site RCRA incineration facilities are readily available and
South Carolina's Executive Order 69-03 does not apply to in-State
incineration facilities.
Source removal to a secure landfill assures that the Shelby site
groundwater will be protected from any possible further degradation,
and that the property can be utilized without future restriction
one? remediation is complete. RCRA landfills are fully equipped
with double liners, double leachate collection and groundwater
monitoring systems, to assure long-tern protection of the
groundwater. These facilities also have deed restrictions which
prevent future use of the land that would compromise the integrity
of the containment.
Although encapsulation should chemically bind all hazardous
constituents in the soils and residuals, there is enough doubt to
require groundwater monitoring of the burial area indefinitely.
-------
- 7 -
More importantly, the presence of the encapsulated residuals would
not allow development of the property in or near the burial area,
either for Hoechst Celanese expansions or subsequent owners, and
would require long-term maintenance.
BPA Response; Companies contracting to provide mobile incinerators
provide the necessary experienced and properly trained personnel to
assure proper operation of the equipment.
The Shelby site groundwater will be protected if any remedial action
other than the No Action alternative is chosen. Additionally,
disposal of contaminated materials at a RCRA Subtitle C facility is
considered less than permanent, since facility containment
structures are subject to failure.
5. Minimal Delay Causing Variables: In addition to time delaying RCRA
requirements associated with an on-site incinerator identified
earlier, there are other delay causing variables associated with
on-site remediation. These include more extensive monitoring and
analytical programs and the development of more elaborate
operational, health and safety, contingency, and closure plans
specific to on-site remediation than would be required for source
removal only. The procurement of an air permit and petition to
delist the by-products from the incinerator is anticipated to take
at least 4 months. There are also many undefined construction
activities such as utilities supplies for the operation of aa
incinerator and water treatment of incinerator scrubber effluent.
(The groundwater treatment system has not been designed to handle
this additional load.) In addition, long-term surface water
handling and unforeseen maintenance problems could greatly delay
operations.
On-site remediation would also be a greater disruption to unrelated
routine operations at the plant.
EPA Response: Any potential 'delay causing variables" should be
anticipated in the design and their possible impacts on the schedule
minimized. Careful and thorough planning should reduce any
potential delays. Delays due to "undefined construction activities'
or "disruption(s) to unrelated routine operations at the plant"
would have to be more clearly defined in order to determine what
impact If any they would have on the project schedule.
6. IcoBomicsi Attachments to the letter summarize the budgetary
estimates received to-date concerning off-site Incineration of the
GRB/dlrt material with off-site landfill disposal of residuals, and
concerning on-site Incineration with chemical f£sBtioa of residuals
and ash. Attached to each summary is the vendor's proposal. The
following is a summary of the remedial action costst
-------
- 8 -
Vendor Location Coat in SlOOO'a
CSX Services, Inc. Off-site 750 (turn-key)
Chemical Waste Management On-site 1,630 (1)
Chemical Haste Management Off-site 1,546 (turn key)
BNSOO On-site 5,170 (1 and 2)
BNSCO Off-site 3,132 (2)
ThennalKEM Off-site 1,800 (2)
1- Does not include Hoechst Celanese's additional costs of
$500,000 to $750,000 to accommodate on-site remediation
activities over and above off-site.
2- Does not include remediation of non-GRD materials or site
excavation activities.
Based on these budgetary estimates, significant cost savings can be
realized through off-site disposal using CSX or Chemical Haste
Management. Reference the attachments for details of the remedial
approach of each vendor.
EPA Response; None of the estimates provided the Agency subsequent
the draft Feasibility Study Report contain enough detail to be
considered as valid estimates. The draft Feasibility Study Report
offered detailed cost estimates for each alternative (Appendix IX of
the Feasibility Study report). Estimates provided by Hoechst
Celanese since the draft Feasibility Study report was submitted nave
been vague, usually appearing as letters to the company with little
or no detail as to how the estimates were developed.
Clarification of the $500,000 to $750,000 required by the company to
"accommodate* on-site remediation has not been received. This
accommodation expense is provided with no supporting documentation
and therefore must be disregarded as unsubstantiated.
7. Conclusiont The two remedial alternatives presented in the TS
Report that appeared most attractive were on-site Incineration with
on-site fixation, and off-site incineration with off-site landfill
disposal of the soils and sediments. After closer evaluation of
these alternatives, Hoechst Celanese recommends off-site
incineration of the CRO materials and off-site landfill disposal of
the contaminated soils and sediments as the preferred alternative.
The major benefits of this approach, as outlined in the preceding
dieoussion, axe believed to be of considerable advantage over
on-aite remediation.
EPA Responsei The Agency's evaluation of all the alternatives as
presented in the draft Feasibility Study Report developed by S & KB,
Inc., for Hoechst Celanese, resulted in selection of the alternative
presented in the ROD. The information submitted by Hoechst Celanese
during the public comment period has been considered; however, no
new useable information was submitted, therefore the Agency's
preferred alternative remains on-site incineration with
-------
- 9 -
solidification of the incinerator ash, burn pit residuals and
polyester chip.
IV.MMAIKING CONCERNS
The only remaining concern at the site is that the incineration be
conducted in a safe manner. In addition, the Hoechst Celanese Company
prefers to have the incineration occur off-site.
-------
ATTACHMENT
2.0 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
-------
CE3LAJSTESE CORI> SHELBY FIBER
OE>ERAT IONS
(OPERABLE UNIT 2)
NPL Site Administrative Record
Index
As of March 2, 1989
DRAFT
Prepared for
Region IV
Waste Management Division
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
With Assistance from
uu
LABAT-ANDERSON, INCORPORATED
Ittt StrMt, Suit. 2200 • Arlington, vuglala J23M • (703) SU-MM
-------
GEX^ANESE COR:E> SHELBY
FIBER OPERATIONS
(OPERABLE UNIT 2)
NPL SITE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
NOTE
DOCUMENTS I>RIOR TO
— OO3 — OS 9 4 CAN BE FOUND IN
THE OCTOBER 6, 1988
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FOR
OPERABLE UNIT 1
-------
03/01/89 Or«ft looax AutUor t*m» Qrttar ?<_s
CTM mi (WBUBLI OKI 2) OactBMou
Oocaant tuabar: O&-OC1-0271 To 037J 0.^. 01/0«/86
Title: (Mao forwudlag final coHunlty lalation* Plan for to* »it» with ll«t of •mtr«*M-« &i«o •ct^bad)
Typ>:
Author: Aadanoc, Mtfvdith Clark«i ua (PA
R>elpl«nt: aoo»t noo«
Att»ch«d: CXL-001-0273
Ooeiawt luatwr: OCL-001-0622 To M23 j^t,, 03/21/M
Tltla: (Mo*o «n»irlxing ooHiuelty nlctlon* «cUvlu«« to
Author: Aadanoa, Maradlth Clarkai U8 IPA
Raeipicat: aoam: OOB«
OoeuMat Hua<9«r: CTL-001-0700 To 0700 Parent: CXL-001-0653 Data: 03/03/M
Titla: Work Aaaigriaaut Covar Obaat
Typa: OTHER
Author: Aadanoa, NaradJth Clarka: US OA
taelpiaot: DOJM: aooa
DocuMot luabMr: CH-003-H6J To 1194 Faraot: CXL-003-1490 O«Ui: / /
Appudlz vz WMtiaohouM Xoelaaratloa Mport
Typvi PLM
Autftor: tacixovebla, 0 Mi
R«clpl«nt: QOIMI BOM
at Ruabar: OB>-001-0<40 To M43 Meat 04/OC/M
Title: (HOBO ------ '-'-j work co«pi«t*d doriag OJ/OO/M)
Typ«t
Autfiori BcroM, Jata C> tell • Mtwlal tngiautn (MNI)
t
Docu»«nt luabar: C«t-001-07l4 To 0734 Paraati Ob-401-0701 tet«i 01/10/V7
TltO«t (L«ttar •uaMTUiog wrk no^platart dwla« 12/00/M)
Typvs OQMRSflVQIDflPd
Aattari BMOM, JoM Ci Mil • MKMrUl taglaMn (
••clplanti aomi OOMA. .—
••f-
«o orsa
.**•
(l*tt«r fonwtflaf to waOHM Z aad II of draft U «itt
Typ»i
Aat&art BATOM, Join Ct «oll • NrbulAl mgln«ar» (KM)
Mciplaat: nooat BOB*
(31^001-0733 OL-OOl-OMl OS^OOl-0403
-------
03/01/«9
Draft Iad*x Author B«a> oroar
(orntABLI UIZT 2)
nt mattert dX-002-0001 To 0283
Tltla: final •••1H1 X»VMUgatloa Kaport Velio* X -
Type: PLAB
CondiUon: MUUDUU.IA
Author: Barona, Jena C: Boil t »utar 1*1 laglaaan
Raclplant: aona: aona
Tart, Tablaa and
DocuMOt luabar: CXL-002-0284 To 0776
Tltl«: final taMdlaJ InvMU0aUoa taport,
Page: 2
Octal 06/01/1?
Oatai 06/01/87
Volum I, AppwKUz A Utrougb 0
Typ.«
Condition! MMQXXALIA
Autaor: Barona, Joan C: Soil c Malarial taglnMn (B&MI)
Raclpiant: nona: nona
Attacnad: OO-002-0289 OL-002-0290 CKt-002-0305 CXL>002-0306 CB-002-0307 Ott-002-0308 OX-002-0311
CXL-002-0312 OQ.-002-0327 CBr-002-0328 CSL-O02-0332 OL-002-0337 OX-002-0339 OX-002-OJ40
CS1-002-0342 OB.-002-0344 CK.-002-0346 (3L-002-03J1 OL-002-03J3 OL-002-03S7 C&-002-0359
CZL-002-0361 OO.-002-0363 OBt-002-0365 Cft-002-0366 OO-002-0366 CH-002-0370 OL-002-0371
CH-002-0372 Ott-002-0373 CSX-002-0374 OL-002-0375
DaciMat tiatMtt CH.-002-03S1 To 03S4
Tltlci (L«ct«r J-'-p 03/00/86 AtatM taport)
CtZ-002-0284
DftMl 04/06/86
Aut&or: Baron*. Jonn Ct Soil < M«t*ri«l lagiawn (SCMT)
taclplaac: ooa*> aon«
OocUMBt luabv: OKL-002-0370 To 0370 Miami dt-002-0284 MUI 01/10/86
Tita«i (X«tt4tf •uwarliino Kort caqvlvtad daring 12/00/86 aad piaoMd 4«tiTitiM fox 01/00/87)
Author: Barona. Joan Ct Soil 6 Material tnglnaar» (SAM)
Raclpiant: nona:
OociBMOt luaovi CH-002-0777 To 10M
Tit la: final HMMILI •! Inv««tlaaUao Kaport Appandix voluM U
flat* I 06/33/87
r tkraaab 8
FLAJI
CondiUon: MUBOULIA
Authori 8arona, Jofia Ci «oil 6 Mtarlal Bagiaaan (MM)
AAClpiam I QODB I OOD0
Attac&ad: OCL~002-UOQ CK-003-14J1 CB-002-1432 CB.-OO3-1453 OBb-«Oa-16S6 Ok-002-1456
CH-002-1622
17 So OUT
Titlfli (»
Typ»i
Aut&or: Bokay. WU114M *i BB
•aelplaflti nona: oooa
CS&-001-W7S
to r*n««> UM pzojaot ••pH»g
Oac*i 10/04/89
-------
03/01/19
Draft ladax Author law Ordar
UWXT 2)
Paoai 3
Docuaaot lUMbari CB-4W-0002 To 0002 Oatai ll/12/«7
Tltla: (L«ttax forvardloo Plaal Xaport Traaaerlpt of tha Puhlle *u*tlag - ralanaai Plhara OMratloaa Site
lowaatlgatlaa*)
Author: Butlar, Bury Pi Cup
lUelplaot: ooa>: noo«
Att*CB«d: CTL-003-0003
(COM)
Oocuaaot Huabar: CXL-OOJ-1947 To 194*
Tltlct (L*tt*r •upportleo; 8o«ea«t
Data i 02/OI/M
[•i ilal approach to Oparabl* out Two)
Author i
Raeiplanti aoac:
Attachad: 'dL-003-1949
, Noa It n»l«r>««« corporation
DocuMat
CSt-003-1949 To 1953
Pacwti CXL-003-1947
Tltla: (Stata of South Carolina tae»cutiv» Ortar flo. 89-03 x*»^-^ 01/ll/n
rraaraarir «n-1 dlapoaal faellitiaa
LIOAI oociaujrr
Author: Caapball, Carroll A, Jr: SC, fltata of
Raclplaat: oooat BOB*
t VuatMri CKL-003-OSI3 To OS93 Par«ot> CXL-O03-09M
Tit la i Baaath ••••••ant for Caiman Pibara Oparatlon tn lit*
Typa« PLM
Authori Cartar, CftaoryU Ji Ui Oapt of toaltb c
Raclpiaat: noaai nooa
Oauii 07/20/M
OoeuMDt NUMMT: OCL-OOa-0297 To 0297
Tltla: (Lattar attaeblag tha PlaaJ Project Oparatlona Plaa for tha alt*)
01/21/M
Author: Cartar, Larryi •oil I lutarlal tooloavra (UMB)
Raclplant: oooat oat*
Attachadi O&-001-OJ9* CIL-001'OSJ3
Paneti CBr-001-0701
07/00/M)
MM! M/M/M
Typai
Aathori Cartar
Jtaclplaoti aooai
Qt •uatwri C3O-002-03S7 »» 03M
Titlai (lAttar praaarrlnp OS/OO/M MMM Baport)
Parwti OB-003-«»4
OC/OS/M
Typai OURUa^PUH
Anthort Career, larxyi Boil « Hatarlil inginaara (
Haclplaat: oonai
-------
Draft lad** Author la* ordar
(QPBuau WIT 2)
Pagra: 4
DaciOMOC Vaster > OEL-O02-0339 To OJ*0
Titl»t (L«ttar pr«a«if1np 06/00/M (tatai tapart)
Parent: CXL-002-02M
Data: 07/07/M
Typa: HIKHMKIHl'IffWCT
Autaar: Cartor, I-arryi tell « Mataritl Ingin«ari (3*«)
toclplaac: ooaat noo«
Oocuaaot VuaCwr: CH-002-0361 To 0362 Pannti. CZL-OOa-0384
Titl»i (L«tt«r •n^iriilog wort ccvpl«t«d during 07/00/M)
Data: 08/Ot/M
Typ«> OOXRUPORDRMCS
AuUtors C*rt*r, i*rry: Soil c
RaelplMiti oooa: aoo«
InglaMri (SMI)
OocuMOt toabets eZL-001-0001 To 0001
Tltiui (l*tt*r mciofiag Draft Finai tapart for tte
Oat«> 06/01/13
Condi UQO: Miaaaa
AutBor: Clark*, MuwlltA Li US DA
Racipiant: aoa»: aoa«
DocuMDt
Tltl«j (
CXL-001-01JO To 01S6 Parent: CXL-001-0073
ecMBaata to laeorporata la ta* Final ttart Plaa)
Oat«> 10/04/M
it GOmftPOMDJDICX
Atttnar: Clarka, Narvltth Li 01 1PA
clplaats ooa*i
OoeiaHBt matimri CXL-003-lt93 To 1901 Paraeti OBi-003-14M
Tltl«: AppMdlx VII Uniwnlty of (UBtrai Florida InclMratloa tapart
TypBi PXJUT
Autnort C14UIMB, Cbriatlaat Unlvwtslty of Caotral Florida
taslplawti aoaai BOB*
Oatat 10/12/M
OociBMOt luobari OX-001-0639 To M3S
Tltlai (lampapv article tltladi "•oil
Farvot:
03/3t/M
aad Mat**
pl«ta«i at
Aataori UMMK,
taeipiaati aooai B
i ttaifey lUtr
Dt
Tltlftl (
t rm •> on? to OMT
«rtl*I* tlUatft
Farwti
«•!!« to ta twta*
Oatai 04/11/M
-------
03/01/89 Draft ladax Author •«•• ardor
(GFBUB1S UWIT 2) DoCMaata
Dm- 1 Mia Vuatwri (Ki-«6£»lMl To 1961 Oatai 02/11/M
Tltlai *DA to Addnaa Cteaaap of lacardoua Hut* ait«* (artiela tram rtm aaal&y aXar naMp«par)
Type: KM
Autnor: Claaamr, Dooai:
Haclplut: Dona: ooo«
DaevOHOt luaMr: OD.-001-0166 To 0167 P«r»nt; OBr-001-0075 tetat 09/21/tS
Tltl«: (Baadvrltuo l«tt«r •aelo«la0 a U.«t of quMtloa* and oooe«ra>)
Author: Coopar, Jay Bi r*ald«nt
taclplcat: nonai oooa
Oocuaaat MUBbvri CZL-003-05M To 0309 Oatai OJ/2JXM
Tlti»» Oaelaratloa for th» bfore«Mot taoord of Oaelaioo
Typvi uou. oociaanT ....
Autbor: OafilhM, L«« At (U «PA
Raelplaari OOIMI BOB*
AttaclMdi CTL-003-0310
DocvBMDt VuatMr: OO.-001-0593 To 0393 Oatci 03/17/M
Tit l«i (M>Ki d**crlBiog Slta vialt Trip JUport on 02/11/96 aad -^T"»J altaa)
Autnar: Daitoaa, Pati »C Oapt of liaaa toaourca*
lUelplaot: oooai aoaa
Atcae&adi ODr-001-0393
Docuant Wuatwr: O&-001-0393 To 0393 faraot) OBr-001-OS« Oatai 02/11/M
TltOa: saapla Aaaly*«a Xaquaat (for Oaoa tettla proparey)
Typa: QAZk
Autfior: Oaltoaa, Patz K Dope of •oaao taaooreaa
Raclplaat: naoat aoo*
DoctaMBt VUBDV: C3CL-001-063* To MM Batai U/3a/
Tltlai &u*>la Intlyaaa laqMMt (fxoa BaCUa property)
typai Ban
ftuThurT OaAoaA
Kaclplaati ooaat
nt matari QB.-O»««II *> OM4 BaMi 04/09/M
Tltiai (IMMO rtaarrlhlng ait* lo«p«Dtlaa oa 03/2i/M)
eoxuaneoci
Auuwri DaJtoaa, Pati K Dapt of
•aelpiaett ooaai BOB*
-------
Draft Index Author B«B* Order page- 6
nunm (crauau urri jj oectMeu
r: OO-001-OC44 To 0649 tat,. 04/13/14
Title: (Cover lettax ermine log »lt* report* tad reault* of laorgaaic «a«ly»ee of well «od (arlaee water
Typai niHBtmn
CondiUoni KIUDIO
Author: DaHoM, t»t: K 0«pt of BOMB HMOUTCM
Baclpiauti oooai noo«
OocioMat luabar: CZL-001-0268 To 026* Oatai U/06/as
Title: (C«rUfl«d l«tt*r •ppreviog Mtork PLu by Soil and M*tarl*l Knglnoan d«t«d 11/01/aS)
Typa: COKRiaVOIIDBICH
Autbar: Ovviaa, Z&OBM H: ua SPA
H«cipi«nt.- 000*1 acaw
Oociawt Muatar: OX-003-1937 To 1937 PAtcat: cn-003-1933 tetti 01/li/t9
Tltl«: (L«ttar MtiMtlaa co»t» far r«Mdlal MTVICM)
Type: OORRiaPOHDBICS
Author: OuJwa, Robart 0: QU 0«rvlea>, toe.
Mclplaat: aoiw: noo«
Doriiaant luatwr: CEL-001-1912 To 1934 D>t*i 01/11/M
Tltl»i (Covar Imttmr tr«nj«ltu.ng UM final draft raaaiAlllty Study naymt)
rypai oojautaPoroBici
Author: Olana, Mlchalla: a OA
taclpiaat: aoaui aaoa
Oaenant luab«r: OO-003-1934 To 19S4 OatMi oa/Of/M
Title: (Lettavr rvjcetlag Boaehat ralinaaa'a prafaraaca for off-alta laelaatratiao)
Type: CDllXX3POKDn<3
Author: Olann, Michelle: 01 DA
Recipleat: aoaa: none
Oocuaeoc Vuabar: OL-001-0076 To 0077 Paraat: CBr-001-007S Oat** 11/OL/U
Title: (Naao Attaching the reriaad-aork plan for the alta and aaklag far a raapnnee)
Typai
Author: Olorar,
Recipient: nooei i
Wi 0011 • lartarlal iBglnaara (MM)
Title: (Letter
to are
auUritle* at tka alta during ll/OO/M)
Oatai U/U/M
Aotaar: Olovar, avacvtt Vi eail •
Keclpleot: aaaa:
teolaaara (MM)
-------
03/01/89
Draft IM*X Author laa* order
rTTJ>O«l (OnftABLC ORT 2) DOOMOta
Doeunot rueber: CBr-401-0394 To 0399
Title: (Mono proaeatlag atacaa report for the Month of 12/00/flS)
Type: OOKRMKMDBrOI
Author: Slower, Iverett Mi toll * Material toglneari (SUd)
Recipient: none: oon>
Data: 01/M/M
OocvaHOt BuatMr: CKL-001-05M To 0391
Titlai (L«tt*r auaBATixiag th« ««ort on tte CTO/aJi«IBy RI/T8 for
Typ«i conuaPODBiai
Author: Olov«r, tv«r«tt Ni Soil C Natarial tngin««r« (OCMI)
Raclpiaot: aooui DOB*
D*t*t 02/I1/M
of 01/00/M)
OocoHOt lluabv: CXL-001-0594 To 03M Oaut 03/04/M
Titlat (L«tt*r d*»crlbiag work OB tte XZ/ra at th« «it» during tta aontlt of 02/00/«6)
Typ«: aomuapoionci
Author: Olov«r, tv«r«tt tfi flail < Material laglaMra (S4MI>---
Raclplant: aoa«: DOB*
DocuMBt Ru«>«r: OL-001-0701 to 0702
Tltla: (L«tt«r auMari*iag «erk coBpl«t«d on toa Kl/TB durlafl 04/00/M)
Oaut 09/0«/M
Typai COntUPOIDBICI
Autbart Olovar, Ivarvct Vi Ooll « Material toglaMura (fttMB)
Racipianti aoo*i aoaa
Attaeaad: dL-001-0704 CB.-001-0707 CKr-001-0709 Ctt-001-0711 dt-001-0713 dt-OOl-0734
Pag*: 7
Ooeuaaot lUBbar: OL-001-0704 To 070S
ranatt OO-OOi-0701
Batai OC/03/M
Tltl*: (l«ttar auHurisiag work ccaplatad during OS/OO/M)
typ*i
Autnor: aiovar, lv*r*tt Hi toil • Material lngln**r* (MM)
Melpleati ooa*: DOB*
OoeuBBBt VUMbari CB-OCl-070t To 0710
Title: (better iiiaaii lilnp wax* orapletert during OC/OO/M)
rypei eamucem
Datai Ot/10/M
Autaori Olor«r,
eipleati DOOBI i
Vt «ail a •nerial
«• OTU
1-0701
I 10/10/M
Titlai (letter
oszlag 09/oo/M)
Typ*i
AutAori Olover, tvervtt Vi Coll • Material tngineera (MM)
Recipienti 000*1 none
-------
03/01/89
Draft Index Anchor laa» Order
(GFOABLI UWZT 2}
Peg*: 8
OoctBHOt Btiaber: CZL-OOI-0733 To 0733 Parent: OL-001-0701 Date: 12/09/86
Title: (letter *n*a*r1ilig war* completed during 11/00/86)
Author: Olover, Iverett Wt Soil a Material Engineer* (S4ME)
Recipient: none: none
Document BiuUaer: CEZ.-001-0733 To 0733 D*t*i 02/09/87
Title: (Letter *u»Bari*lng work completed during 01/00/87)
Type: OQKRESPOKDBICI
Author: Clover, Everett V: Soil * Material Engineer* (3«MB)
Recipient: none: none
Attached: Cn-001-0748 dL-001-0730 OL-001-0811
Document BuMoer: CEl-001-0748 To 0748 Parent: 31-001-0735 Date: 03/08/87
Title: (Letter ane»irl»lng wort coepletad during 02/00/87)
Type: OOJOUaPOKDWCE
Author: Clover, Everett Wi Soil I Material Engineer* (UME)
Recipient: none: none
Oocuvent lluMber: CBr-001-07SO To 07SO Parent: OL-001-0733 Date: 04/10/87
Title: (letter *UMari«lng wort eoicpleted on the JU/F8 during 03/00/87)
Type >
Author: Qlover, Iverett «t eoll < Material Engineer* (MM!)
Xeclplent: none: none
OocvaMOt lueoer: CEX-001-0733 To 0803 Parent i CEL-001-0751
Title: Plnal Peaalbillty Study Mark Plan n*lane*e Piben operation* Bhelhy, K
Type: PTJV
Author: Olover, Everett »> Boil • Material Engineer! (MM)
Recipienti none: none
Oetei 09/01/17
OocoMot luaDert CB.-001-08U To 0811
Title: (Letter auaaarlsing work
Parent O&-O01-O71S
darlnfl 04/00/87)
Oa«ei OS/11/87
Typei
Author: Olowr, l»e*e<:t •• Mil e
eipieati oooe: acem • •
•Merlal tnglneera (MMI)
Title: (Letter
Typei OOVOUEBPODBVfll
Author: Olover, Ivervtt Vi
clpleati nonei
Parent i dL-003-0384
daring U/00/8S)
Dat*i
•lal tnglneera (
)
-------
03/01/89 Draft Index Autnor ««•• Order p_.. 9
U1TT 2) *
DaciaMBt VUOMT: Ctt-00»-fl3*4 To 0347 Parrot i Ctt-002-0284 Data: 02/11/66
Tltlvi (letter rneMi-lflnp wort during 01/00/16)
Type I
Autnor: alavmi, flvvrett Wi floll « IUt«rlaJ rnjlnxri (SAKI)
R*cipi«flt: none: noo«
OociOHOt IUXMT: CXL-OOJ-0348 To 03SO Fu*aC: OL-002-02S4 taut 03/04/M
Tltl«: (t«tt»r pr**«iUo9 02/00/96 fltatu* Report)
Aucbor: Olov«r, tvwtt w: Soli c >ut«rl«l Ingin»«r« (S«KIJ
R*clpi«nt: oooa: ooo*
«u«b«r: CZL-002-0339 To 0356 P*r*nt: CXL-002-02M taut 04/OC/M
Tltl«! (L«tt«r providing 04/00/89 atitu* Report)
Typ*t
Author: Olov«r, «v«r«tt w: 5otl < Material tnglaawri (OANI)
Roclplwit; aoaa: noo*
OocuMOt MuatMrt CXl-002-0363 To 0364 P»r*nt: CIL-002-02M D*t*t 09/10/86
Tltl«i (L«ttar untmtritiag work eoMplvud during 08/00/M)
Autaort Olov«r, tv«r«tt «i fcil
taelpiaat: aoaai BOM
Dmiaent luaber: OCL-002-0369 To 0365 Parents CZL-002-0264 Datei 10/10/86
Titlei (Letter •ueairUing work completed daring 09/00/86)
4S^M>j • flQJBQCSIOIID^V^X
* f |^ • »M^«««*e^M«r«^rae«*«v" «^
Author: aiover, Iverett Wt toll ( Material tngiaeeri (84NI)
Recipient: none: none
Oocu»*Bt Buaber: dL-002-0366 To 0367 Parents dL-002-0384 Oetei 11/10/86
Titlet (X«tt«r •uHMrlciafl work ooapleted during 10/00/86)
Aaujori alow, Ivmtt Wi aeU • Mcurlal tng DOM
To OMt Pareoti O&-002-O384 Octet U/Ot/86
during 11/00/86)
Typwi
Autnori fllovar, tvwmt Vi Ball 6 itourlal togiaMn (MMI)
•aclpionti nan*i DOOM
-------
03/01/89
Draft Zno0 Author !*•• ordar
ODJUDUI (QFBUBU UWIT 2) OOCUMOU
Paga: 10
DaeoBant matteri CKL-OO3-0371 To 0371 Parent: CZZ.-002-0284
Title: (Letter mean 11 lug work completed during 01/00/87)
Type: CDHUSPODBTO
Author: Olover, IVerett H: toil * Material Engineer* (MM)
Recipient: none: none
02/09/87
OocvOMOt Huaev: CZL-002-0372 To 0372 Puvat: OOr-002-0284 0«tai 03/08/87
Tltl«i (Lcttar •uaMxising wort ce*pl«tad during 02/00/87)
Typ«i CDJWX3PQHD8HCI
Author: Olov«r, Kv«r«tt H> Soil 4 Hit«rl«J tnjlnaan (MM!)
Recipient: 000*1 aon»
Oocuaaot Ruater: CXL-002-0373 To 0373 Parwrt: CH-002-0284 Oat«i 04/10/84
Title: (L«tt«r fnmtriiiag work coBpl«t«d during 03/00/87)
Typ»: OOXUSKHO0CI
Author: 61ov«r, Ivar«tt Vi toll < lUtarlal InglaMrs (Mm; -
taelplcat: aoam: aacm
DociBHOt KUMMr: CKL-002-0374 To 0374 Parantt dL-002-0284 0>t*t OS/10/87
Tltlci (L«ttar *UMMrl*lag uork eo*pl«t«d during 04/00/87)
Typ*: CORUSPORDBICi
Author: Olovw, tvarctt H: Soil < lutarlal ""j1~p*rr (UNI)
Recipient: nonai noa*
OocuMOt MuatMf: OEL-002-0379 To 0376 Pancrti Ofc-002-0784 taut 08/09/87
Tltlas (tMUr •UHMrlslag wort eaMBlat^ daring OS/00/87)
Typ«: aoRRtSPOKDBici
Author: Clov%r, tv«r«tt Mi toll • lutartal toglanr* (MM)
Haelplsnti ooa*: aoo«
OeeuMBt *UBbMr: C3X-003-1939 To 1939 B»t»i 02/08/89
Tltlai (£«ttw traoMUttiag th» Opvahda Uttlt T*o P*MiMUtr Itady ud freoaiiii »Ua Fact
Type: COXXXSPO
Author: HaJ^ahen
Recipient: aoaei ncoe
Attached: OIr-003-lMI-
(CDN)
Ooc
Tltlai PlaU r»a«U)U1ty
cpsratiaa*
.7 «o 0907
03/M/M
Opwmble onit z -
Typ««
Author: lardia, Niehaal Oi toU < NatarlU
taclplant:
-------
03/01/89
Draft Index AoUor laae Order
oruiTMl (OPXUBLI WIT 2) Ooeiaenta
Pag*: 11
Docaeact ffoabert CIL-M3'-OJ07 To 0307 Parent: CEr-002-02t4
Tltla: (Latter forwarding Permit I7341X dated 10/12/63 and anall void 17241)
Type: aomuraonai
Auuor: He lea, Robert f: WC Dept of Batural Reeourcea < Coamuilty nira1n[aauL
Racipiact: oona: none
Data. io/12/«3
HuBfi«r: OO.-002-0308 To 0310 Parwrt: CTL-002-0284 Data: 10/12/83
Tltla: Pvzmit for Uia oiac&arga of 3*«aa, Induatxial Waataa, or OUMT Maataa
Typa: IXGU. OOCUMDT
Auuor: Balu, Robert F: K 0«pt of latural taaourcaa i Couwnlty Ocvadop^uit
Raclpiant: nona: aona
OociaMOt (Tuabar: C3X-001-0273 To 0293 Paraoti OL-001-0271 Oatai 01/01/M
Title: Coamalty Ha-latlooa Plaa for Calaaaaa Titmr* Oparatlooa aita flbalfcy, K
Typ«: PtM
Auuor: Bandar «on, B Michael: ua 0A
Raelpiaati noaat aooa
Oocuaaot Buabar: CXL-001-0713 To 0730. Oat«i 10/23/M
Tltla: (Maao attachioo taglon IV data on apllt aaja^laO
Typa: OOlWMPOKDBiai
Author: Boopomr, Charlie: 08 0A
Recipleat: nonet none
OOClBHBt RUHwr: OO-001-0164 To 0163 Parent: CBr-001-0075 Oat«> M/30/U
Tltla: (Handwritten letter i.'naaair In^ on toe Beating between DA and relineat aad aattng for «PA to
coaacleno* aad watcn dog*)
AuUor: Lavender, Jackie: Celaneae Corporation
Recipient: none: none
't
Document luaoer: CXL-001-06M To 0637
Title: (Letter confirming 04/04/OT
Date: 04/07/M
aatlon reganllng 1I/W ProgxeB at ta* alte)
oarporatlon
oocuaent iruatwr: Ott Oej-OUa flB 01*3 Parent: OL-O01-O075
Title: (Letter aiie»«r1i1ng ooMente on the Draft wort Plaa for Ue aite)
Typei
Oatei M/24/tS
AuUart Link. Donald »t K Oept of •atnral • IcoBomlc
-------
03/01/89 Draft Index Author laa» Order p^,, 12
(or»Aau UWIT 2)
Ooeoaot tnatwr: CXL-O03-194O To 1946 Parent: OL-003-1939 Oatat 02/08/89
Title: operable Oalt fWo P%aalblllty 8tudy and Proposed PLta Pact Sheet - Calaaaae Plhera operation* Site - Cl«v«lAnd
County, Berth
Type: PUUI
Author: Lloyd, Sharon Ls loos XIl«e c BaaUtoa
t: ooo«: aoa«
OocuMUt HuBb«r: OC.-003-1937 To 1957 Data: 02/10/89
Tit la: (Ixaapl* of lattar aaat to •aflti tranaaUtting a public aaaUjv innmira-^Mii and Pact ffhaaT]
Typ«:
Autaor: Lloyd, Saaroo t: Boos Allan t aaalltco
Raelplant: nooai nona
Attacnad: (3L-003-19Si OL-003-1MO
OocuMUt MuBbar: OX-003-0003 To 0111 Pazaot: CIL-003-0003 Data: 07/21/87
Title: final Raport - Tranacri.pt of tna Public Hurting - g»i»~.-» fitera Opaxatlona ait* Baaallil Invaatioation
Typai PtM
Autoort toyld, aharon i: Boos Allan C Hamilton
Raclplant: aea»s nona
Docuaant luabari Oft-OOl-OSM To 0517 Data) 02/07/M
Titlai (Naao rvportiag OB ••aflng hald oa 01/30/86 eoocaffaiag aa*plla0 and analytical prooraB for
InvMtiaation)
Autaor: Lucia, flnirlayj Sell • Material laalnaara (•«•)
lplant t nona: nooa
OoeuBaet Vuabvi CtL-001-07U to 0712 oatai 10/14/86
Tltla: (MBBO oonfirBlog a coavaraatioo raqartllng tna autamittal of to* Paaalhility ttady)
Aittaor: Lucia, Snirlayj •oil • Material taglaMn (04MB)
Raclpivot: none > nona
Document fUBMr: CTL-001-08U To o*U Oetai 09/14/17
Title: (Letter ooaoeniBg to* •wtiag *• Aiacoea raaprwie»« to coBBeota for the C report aad aataUttAl of Plata U
report)
Typei
Autaor: t.iirla, BBUtafi •all • •BtBrlal laoiaeen (MNB)
Recipient: noaei BBBBVv7
OoroBBBt tuBOer: OL-003-U3S to 193* Batei U/OT/M
Title: (Letter aunaUttlag ooBBBOta OB taa Paaalbillty 6 tody
'"""^'•J'*
Autoari Mayroee, v C: Pe.ltBaaa Oorporatioe
Recipient i aoaai none
Atteeaedi O&-003-1937
-------
03/01/19
Draft Index Aut&ar I«M Order
UKTT 2)
Pen*-
Doc
at Vnafeer: C*L-00*-O394 To 1107
oi/01/t9
Title: Final Feasibility Ctudy Report - Operable Unit 2 - Source Notarial - Baac&at Celaaeaa Facility, S&tlby, Bartjj
Carolina - VolaM li Text, Appaadlcee I ThrougH III
Type: PLM
AutHor: Itoye, MlebMl K: Soil « tutorial Ka«iaMri (0«MI)
Atcaebad: CH-003-0786 OB.-003-0804 OKL-003-08H
Ooeiaaat Huab«r: CSL-003-11M To 1469
Tltl«i Final f«*«lbiaity Study taport • Opv4bl* Unit 2 - Some* »ttt*ri*l -
Ctroltu - Valu»» 2: Appsalie**, Appudlco* IV, A Throuflfl C
Dttft 01/01/69
C*UJMM r«ellltr,
, BorU
PLM
Author: H«y»,
Raelplaat: Don*: noo«
Attacnad: CD.-003-1109
Ki Ooil « Itetarltl tng< a»»rm (S&MI)
OB.-003-1210 O&-003-1220 OB.-003-1336
Docu
ot lumbmci CTL-003-1490 To 1931
Datat 01/01/69
Title: Plaal Faaaltlllty study Kaport - oparaJftla Unit 2 - Sourca Mat«n«l - loacturt CaXtnaaa Facility,
Carolina • Voluae 3: Appandlcaa, Appaodlcaa IV, o aol I, V Xhroogb XX
Autnor: Hay*, Klcfiaal K> ioll 4 MatarlAl tefllne«r« (54MI)
Raclplant: ooaai oooa
AttacMd; OX-003-1491 CS.-003-1641 OL-003-1847 CB,-003-166S CB-003-16M CIL-OOJ-1M2 CEb-00)-l»14
Oociaaot luabar: C&-00 1-0606 To 0610
Title: (Let tax axplalniag aa arror MOB oa orlfllnal For» 1 for aaapla ow-017)
Oatai 06/27/67
Typat
Aouar: MeCord, Jobs •> Oavla 4 Floyd
Raclplaati oooa:
OoctBMot U\utHtt Ott-002-14S2 ID 1452 ' Fareoti O&-002-O777
Title i (Lettax aneloalDfi fiaal data oa project 11175-65-1030*)
Oatat U/10/64
Type i
Coodltlaoi
Auuwri NeCord, Jata It Oavla 4
. Raclplant: ooaa: aooa
: Ca>-OjB>U53 IB 14S) Paraoti OO-002-«777
-.-•:
*t .- •
Title: (Lattar llillal •laiillnn '•lillllnn (or lett«r datad 10/U/M)
t U/10/M
Typai GQBIB09DIKS
AutAar: MeCDrt, Jofto It OaVl* •
Keclplant: ooae: DOB*
-------
03/01/19
Drift Iao*x Author •«• ardor
(CTIMBLI UWIT 2)
Pan*- 14
DocoMot Vuabar: OL-OO-14S4 To 14SS . Farantl CB.-002-0777 Bit*: 10/23/M
Tltl*i (Letter •tatlag that all laboratory aaalyMi conducted by Davl* c Floyd, lac and Trtaagl* LIB 1« complete with
list of deflclaBCle* la analytical re*ulta) ^^
Author: Mccord, Joha Bs Davl* c Floyd
Raelplaot: aooa: aoo*
DocuB*nt HuBbcr: OQ.-001-0731 To 0731 tat*: 10/31/86
Tltla: (L*tt*r aacloilng vcrlou* sit* r*port* «ad raiolti of Ihorgaole iaaly>*> of «•!! *~< sorfaea vatar
Typa: OQJOUaPOHDBICT
Condition: KXasnO ATTACBMUrr
Author: Moor*, Ban: UB IPA
Raclplant: 000*1 BOB*
Docuaaat luaoar: CXL-001-0736 To 0736 Oatas 02/12/87
Tltla: (Lattax anclaalng «t*tu» rapart* fro* 10/00/86 to 02/00/87 and PoaalhlUty atady vork Plaa)
CooditiflB I MTStfTliff J^^JJ^OOtDfS
Author: Noora, Ma: US IPA
Raclplant: nooai BOB*
Ooruant IVIMDMT: OO,-001-0737 To 0737 Octal 02/12/87
Titles (l*rtt*r aocloalno •utu* nporu and FaulblUty 8tody work Plaa for r*po*ltary)
Typa: OOIMt8PQ*9BCB
Author: Moor*. Mat Ufl IPA
taclplaat: BOB*: BOB*
DaeioMBt luibar: OtL-001-0741 To 0747 Data: 03/28/87
(tatter providing OOHHDU oa tha Draft MI)
Typ»i
Authors Moor*, Mat U8 IPA
Recipient: 000*1 nan*
t O&-001-0601 Ta 0*04 Panati CBL-M1-07S1
aa tta ffikMibUity ttady Mark Pl*n)
Mtti U/ll/tS
Typai
Authori Moor*,
elplaat: aoaai
DocuHOt muMri OO-M1-OM9 To OtOS P¬t «L-«J1-O751
Tltl«i (l«ttw with naaiin to add to liat amll«d on U/ll/M)
tatMl U/lt/M
Author i Naoxw,
taclplacti 000*1
I M CPA
-------
03/01/19 Or«ft late Author (CM Qrdar Pag.. 13
UKIT 2) ~
DocuMBt Vuafcar: OX-OM-O001 To 0001 Out*! 06/23/17
Titla: (MMBO •nnrmnHtig poJtlle aMting for 07/21/6?)
Author: Hoar«, Mo: 01 EPA
Raclplaot: oooa: aon«
Docuaant Ruaear: CXL-001-0650 To 0691 Oat«; 04/30/66
Title: (tattar daacrl&log tha ov«rvl«v >lt« vl«it on 03/12/S6)
Typ»l
Author: Five*, J«ffr*y A: CJB^I Dr»»»«r c MCKM (OM)
R«cipi«nt: OOM: aao«
OoeuMBt luMfiar: CKt-001-0632 To 0700 Pannt: dL-001-0633 ' Mui OS/07/S6
Tltl«: K«Hdl«l Iov«itl5«Uon/r«««lWllty Study Ov«niglit/T«ebale«l Support Itark P1*D for CaUa«>« Pltar Optrutioo Alt*
, IK VoliaM I
Typ-l FLU
Authors Flare*, J»ffrwy A: CMV OrmMar C McXaa (CDM)
elplaot: noaa: ooo«
OocuMOt Buaftar: OL-001-0653 To 0654 Data: 05/07/M
Tltlct ( Cover Ivttar fozw«rdia0 Ovvnigbt «ad T«eHalc*I Support Mark Flaa)
Typ»i
Author: Flare*, Jutttwy At Ca»p Oraaaar I NeXaa (ON)
Raelplaat: ooaat naoa
Attaebadt CIL-001-OC32 C«L-001-0«96 OO-001-0700
CB.-001-0696 To 0*96 Faraatt OL-001-OC53 Oatat 03/21/M
Titla: (Maao oartlfyiag no Kaon ooofliet of latarMt aMocl«tad trltb tha work •••
Typa: C010Ut8FOD0a
Author: Flaroa, J«ffr*y A: Caap Oraaaar c NeXaa (ON)
Raelplaat: ooaa: oona
Oaeuaaat Vuabar: CKL-001-01M TO 01*9 Faraoti OL-O01-O07S Oatai 10/03/U
Tltla: (N*V9 rwrlawlaa tba Draft n/M Mark Flu
-------
03/01/89
Drift Zadax Autoor Raaa Ordar
(oriiuau uvrr 2)
Paga: 16
OocuHBt Vnbar: OB-flO*-OS«3 To 09U . n«ta: 07/27/M
Tltlaj (Lattar forwarding laaltb Aaaaaaaut for alta)
Typa: OORRK3POBDBH3
Author: Platroaavlcj, Caalaar Vt tgmcy for Toxic aubatajiaaa < OIMMM Jta«lctry (AX8DR)
R*cipl«ut: oocu*: noo«
Att*oa«d: CEL.-003-0583
~-™~— — — •"" •-•-"•^^^^"•••••^-•-« ••*«> J_l_™^ • I I II I I I | • *^»* •>^W*~W«*^^1KA
Raelplant: oooat aoaa
Atucdad: CXL-001-0610
DOCUMBC miabar: CH,-001-0610 To M21 Puaat: JL-001-O609 0«tat 03/10/M
Tltla: Ad«lELi»tx«tiv» Ordar on CoaMat
Typai utaa ooeuxnx
Authors lUvaa, Jack Ii III DA
Xaclplaat: aoaa: oona
Oocuaaot Bupbar: cn-002-0290 To 0301 Panati C«L-002-fl2M Oatai 03/10/M
Tltla: Admloiatrativa Ordar oa Prmaant
Typat uroAi nocuKnrr
Author: Itavaa, Jack It DM IPA
Raclplaat: oooa: aoaa
OocUBant luabar: CK-001-0170 To 0170 ttrmatt O&-001-O07S Oatai / /
Titlai (Maao ~T—*
-------
03/01/S9 Draft Index Author tea* Order Page: 17
<-»r_»«r««» (CFBUHLI UKXT 2) Doctmmnta
Document lumber: CtL-OCJ-0333 To 0933 Parent: OX-001-0397 Date: 07/22/85
Title: (Memo attaching Bmalth aad safety Plan information)
Type: CQRXLSPOHDOCl
Author: font, villlaa Si Plbar ladnaxrlea
Recipient: none: none
Document Huaber: CZL-002-0289 To 0289 Parent: OX.-002-0284 Dates 07/30/S6
Titles (Nemo forwarding Coneaat
Author: ROM, wiiliu BI riter
Recipient: aoems DOD«
Doconot BualMr: CEL-002-03M To 0306 Ptraatt ODr-002-03M 0>t«i 04/19/83
Till*i (Mao regarding raquvt la letter datad 01/11/83 for Part • paxBit application)
Author: ROM, Wllliaa Is Plhmr
Recipient: none: none
nnriiaatir •uabar: CKL-002-0339 To 0339 Pareati OL-002-0284 Oatai 02/02/84
Title: (tettavr reaffirming that eoBpaay doea not ehooea to file a Part • application)
Type: oonuupoiiDnci
Condition: NAMXMLIA
Author: Seller*, H Oi Celanave Corporatloo
Raclplantj none) DOB*
Document lumper: OtL-001-0624 To M33 Beta: / /
Titles OOrm Quality Control Ovmrriew Report Celaneae Pihara Sneltoy, K
Types FLA*
Author: Sloan, Freds US DA
Recipient: none: nan*
OocuMBt luabwr: OL-001-0703 To 9703 Oetai OS/U/M
Titles (Maao attaehiag ovvrlvav oC. 8aa.il In] ectlvltiee durlag 03/24/84 throooa 03/38/M)
Types
Condition: KIHIM
Authors Sloan, FzMU.. OB 0m
Recipient: oooai SMHI..-:.
at •amfiers CBr-091-««M So OBM tews 03/31/M
Titles (Cover letter atteohiag • oooy of a mmMpapar article datad 03/39/M)
Authors Spaaglar, Carl Ms r»1inea« Corporation
Reclpleoti aooet none
Attached!
-------
03/01/19 Draft Indax Author laaa Croar Paoa: 1*
rrtimn (OFEUBLS unr 2)
DacuMat fuafcar: Ob-OOI-0646 To 0646 Data: 04/14/M
Titla: (Lattar •ttaenlaa. eopy of articla dmtad 04/11/86)
Typa: CQHRKSFQIDBai
Author: Spanglar, Carl Hi Calanaaa Corporation
Raclpiant: nona: nan*
Attachad: CXL-001-0647
DoClOHDt RUBbar: CXL-002-030S To 0305 Paranti CXL-002-02M Oat*I 01/11/63
Tltl«: (L«rtt«r r«a^ia*Uo0 pare I of •pplieatloa far basardou* waata facility for norag* eoataiiwn)
Typa:
condition: Kisszxo
Author: Strickland, OH: K Oapt of luaan Raaourcaa
Raclpiant: nona: nona
Docuaant RuBbar: CZL-002-0340 To 0340 Paraat: Cb-002-02S4 Data: M/17/M
Tltla: (Lattar advising that plant haa baan danlad a parait aad all to*
Typa: coKUSPOiDaiCl
Condition: NAMXKALIA
Author: Strickland, OH: K Dapt of Hiaan Raaourcaa
Raclpiant: nona: nona
DaeiMBt Muabar: CXL-001-073« To 073S Data! 02/1S/V7
Tltla: (Lcttar stating that than ar> no OOMMOU oa tha raaaibillty Stody Hark Plan at thia tla»)
Typat COIQIBSPOKDBCI
Author: Swallow, Juna At K Oapt of loan Maaoureaa
Maclplant: aoaai nona
Dociaant •uabv: CXL-001-0749 To 0749 Oatai 03/M/t7
Tltla: (Lcttar axplalaiag Soparfnnd Aaaadaanta and r»inThgr1iM'l"n act of 19M - SABA - and aooooraglng oontaet with
•PA to dlaeuaa iapact of SABA on alta)
Author: Tohin, Patrick Ji OS CTA
Kaclplant: noaa: noaa
Pat«i 04/M/M
Author:
•aeiplaat:
t BMBpar: CXL-001-OSf7 IB 09fl7 Baw U/04VM
Tltla: (IMH attacnlag an ovBcvlav of la^illnj actlvltiaa doriAa 02/09/M aad oa/W/M)
Typa:
Author: vick, lugb C: US OA
Raclpianti aooat aeoa
Attacnad: CU-OOl-OStS
-------
03/01/19
Draft Indax Autaer I«
fTTJIM (OPHUaiS Uirt 2) Docuwita
19
Vuabari 31-003-0311 To 0311
Titla: (Lattar forwarding DDBa pandt)
Paraott CXL-002-02a4
Datai 03/01/tS
type: oonuapoaDaa
Author: Vila*, R Paul: «C Dapt of Batural Raaourea* 4 Coannlcy n»ii»1ii[aaiii
taclplaat: con*: oon*
BuBb«r: CSL-002-0312 To 0326 Parvnt: CXZ«-002-02S4 0«t«i 03/01/fS
Tltl«: Pmrmlt to Olachjirg* w««t*w«t«r Und«r UM ••tioatl Pollutant Diacb&rg* lllMlnation
Typ>: UfiU, UUCVMUTJ
AuUtox: WllB*, R Paul: HC 0«pt of Ictural RHOUTCM C CoBBunlty 0«v«lopBut
Raclpi*at: aoou: ooca
Ooeuant luaMr: CBL-002-0327 To 0327 P«r*ati CH-002-02M
Tltl«i (L«tt«r forwardlog Pwalt f37S4X4 for dlicbcrg* of Air eootMlaut* iata
Oatai 04/04/M
AuUori HtUM, R P«ul: K D«pt of Mtural RMOUTCM «
DOO«
Ooeuaoot «uao«r: CXL-002-032« To 0931 tmtmatt CXL-002-02M
Tltla: Air Permit for tte Dl*ch*T8» of Air Coat«aliuu)t« Into tte Ataocpoar*
Typai UOU UUCUXMT
AiitAart Vila*, R Paul: K Mpt of Batural RasourcM < C<
Raelpl«at: DOM: aaom
Dat«i / /
OoeuHBt luabcr: Ob-002-0332 to 03 3« Panel! OI>-002-02M
Title: (Lattar forwarding •edification* to UM Pvrmlt IK 004992)
Oatai oi/U/M
Autflor: wiUM, R Pault K 0«pt of latural RaaourcM
Raclplant: aooas non»
OocUMOt
Tltl«i (
OL-001-070C TO 070f
rlMaa 04/23/M tluaagfe OC/2S/M
Oatat 07/Ol/M
ln»^i«TlOB at alt*)
OOHQBF09BI
Autaori wilaoa,
Raelplant: oooci
(CBN)
*.
Titlai Appandia I aaalytiaal Data
Typat P1M
Raclplaoti
Parwtt OL-003-09M
Oatvt / /
-------
03/01/19
Draft Ind« Author •«•• ardor
nr JIBUTI (CFKRABLI uni 2) oaeu
Paga: 20
C*L-OM-0«04 TO 0817
Tltla: Appaadlx II KUk iaiaaraant Data
Farant: OEL-003-0594
Data <
Type:
Author: nooa: none
JUcipieat: none: none
DocuMnt BuMar: CZL-003-0818 To 1107
Parant: CXL-003-OS94
0«t«: 01/01/89
Tltla: Appendix III: Fin*! Bxp«od*d Ch«r*ct«rlutlao Study - Olyeel Maaovcry Unit Slodfft «ad Burn Pit ATM - Haacbct
M Facility, Saalby, north Carolina
Typa: PIAV
Author: nona: aoaa
Raclpiant: noaa: ooaa
Ooeuaant luabar: CKL-003-1109 To 1209
Tltla: Appaodlx IV Final Traatafilllty Study - Biological Traa
Calaaaaa Facility, Stalby, Borth Carolina
TypaI FLAB
Author: aoami none
Kaeiplant: oonai oooa
Parmnt: CXL-003-1108 Oatai 01/01/89
;t of tha Olyool Bacovary Unit (ludo*
DocuMOt BuBbari CXL-003-1210 To 1219
Tltla: Appaadlx A Fbotaorapn*
Type i FLAB
Author: noaa: oooa
Maeiplanti nooai nooa
Oocuaant RUBlMr: CXL-003-1220 To 1335
Tit la: Appaadijc B Dally Loga
Typa: FLAB
Author: aooa: nan*
Raclpiant: oooa: nooa
DocuMOt Bueoer: CB.-003-L1J4 To 1489
Tltla: Appendix C Mlerotoai Jhwalta
Typet PLAi
Author: ooaa: aoaa>
Recipient: noaa: DOB»' '
Farant: OL-003-1108
Data: / /
nti Cn-003-llM
Data:
Farant: Ob-003-ilM
Datai / /
Oocuaaot Buatwrt nTL-OHVUtl to 1MO
Title: AppaodUc D Laboratory Analytical .Data
Typa: FLAB
Authart oooa: oona
•aclpiaat!
Faraot: OL-O03-1490
Data t
-------
03/01/19
Draft index Aatnor B«e
(OPIRABU am jj
Page: 21
Document •aaberi CXt-Ofli-U41 To 1646
Title: Appendix I Calculation ftrlafa
Type: nJUl
Author! Done: npfnf
Recipient: none: Done
Parent: 00^003-1490
Oat*i / /
Docuaeat Kuaber: CXL-003-1847 To 1864 Parent: CH-003-U90 Oat*: / /
Title: Appendix v vet Air Oxidation Report
Type: PIA>
Autbor: none: none
Recipient: none: aone
Ooeiaent Huaber: CZL-003-1902 To 1913 Parent: CKL-003-1490 Date: 11/11/M
Title: Appendix VIII TreataAllity Study Report
type: fUOl
Autaor: none: KiSar AMaclatea, Inc.
Recipient: none: none
Oocuaeat Bueoer: CEL-003-1914 To 1931 Parent: OL-003-1490 Date: / /
Titles Appendix IX Alternative Coat Calculatiooa
Type: PLM
Author: none: none
Recipient: none: none
Docueent Vuaber: CZL-003-19SS To 1995 Date: 03/09/99
Title: (Preee reieaee announcing a public Meting to be neld on febraerf !•/ 194)9)
Typei
Author:
Recipient:
Document
Title: (
Type.
Autbor:
Recipient:
none: US OA
: CZL-003-19S6 To 1934
eeect of tbe rebroary 14/ 19t9 public
03/09/99
lag trm tbe
I M 0A
Bt Vuaber:
Title: diet of
Typet OTH0
Autbor: nonet US 0A
clpleot: none:
to UM Parent: (3X-003-19S7
,vw raeeirlng coplee of tbe public
I 03/10/99
eart tbe Pact
-------
03/01/19
Draft Indax Author !*»• Qrtar
(ORMBLI uni 2>
P*g«: 23
OociMKt Vuabar: OO-OOVIMO To 1MO
Tltl«: fnnriiiiini ••IT far tte poblle •at
Typ*: OIBXR
AutBor: ooam: US 0A
R«clpi«nt: oooa: oooa
P«nat< CXL-003-19J7
to M h«ld Ftbruary 16, 1969)
03/10/S9
-------
E CORJP SHELBY
FIBER OPERATIONS
(OPERABLE UNIT 2)
NPL SITE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
NOTE
DOCUMENTS PRIOR TO
CEL—OO3—O594 CAN BE FOUND IN
THE OCTOBER 6, 1988
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FOR
OJPERABLE UNIT 1
-------
Draft loam* Oocaawt iia&tr Qrdar
(OF0ABU OMIT 2) DacM*Bt*
Pag*<
ot tartMri CBr-OOS-0001 To 0001
TltO*i (i*ct*r *aela*iaiB Draft rioal Jteport for uw «it*)
condition < taaaao AHUMR
Authori Clark*, N*r*dita L: us OA
taclpiaat! siapaoa, Oary Ll tell • Material cngi4*ar* (MMI)
0at*i OC/01/tS
c liwter: CB.-001-0002 To 0074 Par*nt: OCL-001-0003
Tltlat rtaal toport CalauM* ftb«r« OparaUeaa 311» forward PlAnniafl 5t«ly
Typat RJUI
Autfior: ooo*t C«Mp OrMMr < NelM (ON)
Recipient: aoaai US OA
t Auteri OO-001-0003 To 0004
(Cow l«tar aubkittiag tb» riaal lUport)
Author i Noterta, Joon LJ Caqp Otvuar f MCKM (COM)
Melpluti wrigat, RUMAII t« Ul OA
Attaobadi CO-001-0002
Oaut 07/22/M
Oat*< 07/23/13
DeciMOt loatari eaa-001-0073 Xe 0263
Tltlai Wbrt Plan Obaiby Facility Oalinw FlMn OpvatiaM «h*l*y, K
11/01/U
«yp»«
Aattori OOMI tell « Mtarlal Saginav* (SCNI)
Raelpiaflti ooo» BOB*
Attacbadi OL-001-007* OB-001-01SO O&-O01-01S7. CB.-O01-OU2 OL-OOl-OlM CB-001-01M CB-001-01M
CKL-001>0170
Dnriaanr Muatar: CB-001-007C To 0077 tarwti C9b-001>{M7S
T1U«> (HMO attacttlafl UM svviMd work plan for tM ait* and aakia0 Cor a
AuUuart aiow«r, IvwKt Vt aeil • MatariaJ tog;
Clark*. N*r*dita ti 0* t»A
Oatai ll/01/«S
OocoMBt KiuMrt CH-001-0150 CD 0154
Tltl*i (N*Bo aooMittiag ooMeta to
l CXL-401-007S
it* ia to* final Mark Man)
Typ.i
Autaori Clark*,
elplaoti
, M aoil « Mnurial
Mt*l 10/047M
at
TiU*l (M
twrs CBr-O01-«U7 Co OUT
acevptiaa draft work plaa
;i Cft-OOl-0073
to r*vi*v tk* nroj«0t
Atttftari BoMy, vuila* «» n OA
Clark*, HaradlU it M OA
I 10/04/1
-------
03/01/69 Draft latec Doeoaent luaber Outer Paoaj 2
UWIT 2)
DoctMot fnatoer: A and nitnaai aod aaklag for 1PA to
oonaclaoc* and vatcn dog*)
Typa:
Autoori Lawaadar/ JaeJUai Calaoaaa Corporatloa
Raclplant: Ciarlta, Marvdltn l« 01 0A
Doctaaat Huabar: OD.-001-01M To 0167 Paraat: CXL-001-0073 Da tat M/21/tS
Tltla: (Bandvrlttae lattar aocloalng a ll«t of quaatlona and ooacama)
Aatnari Coopar, Jay I: raaldaat
Kaelplaat: Clarto, Maradlth Li U8 DA
DocuBaat luabar: OX-001-01M To 0169 Parantt OB-001-OO7S Datai 10/02/iS
Tltla i (MaM raviawlog tba Draft U/TC Work Plan datad M/20/U)
Typat > i mmrpoB
Autaart Piatxoaavies, Caaiaar Vi Aoancy for Toxic •obataaoaa « Dlaaaaa tagictzy (.
Meiplants Ciarlta, Naraditn Li V* DA
BUHbar: C&-001-0170 To 0170 Paranti O9b-001-007S Oatai / /
Titiat (Maae ragaatiag to ba on aaiUag liat for infomatlon en alt* witb handwrittaB aota)
Autnori Khaa, Donald Tt raaidaot
Daelplanti Clark*, Meredith fci Of DA
at ViMbar: CSL-001-0264 To 0267 Datai U/01/65
Tltla» Pact 8beat
Typei PLAI
DOBI
Raclpianti oooei
To OOM Dat»i U/0«/tS
Tltla i (Certified l*tt*r approrlAg Mark Plan by aoll aad Natwiaa tnolneari datad 11/01/tS)
Type i OOMUPQeVaVGI
Antnori Oawia*. Thf»i« Vi a DA
Recipient i tnoalean, Soaan Pi relinin Carporatle
-------
03/01/99
Draft Xadax Oeeoaut
ountB (oriMBU uwrr 2)
i O&-OOI-C3M To 0370
U/12/M
at tto alta during 11/00/9S)
Tltlct (X«tt«r
Jrt^ *
Autftor: Olovvr, tv«prtt Wt Sell < lutarlil tng1r»«ri (SMS)
taelplcat: Cl«rk>, MarwUU L< U3 IPA
Oeeiaaot luatoar: CH-001-0271 To 0372 Datci 01/Of/M
Tltl«> (MMO fazwwdlag final CoHButlty taUtlau PUa for tto ait* witA Uat of >1i1r«a»»«'i alao
TypBI COKMBFOnBCi
Autear« AodwrMo, IMzaditb Clartcaj W OA
Cro«by, LMI K Oopt of
-001-0273
Onriiaant «u«to*r: OO-001-0273 To 0293
Tltl«: CoHuiUty MftUtlou Pl«a for C«l«n«««
Par«nt< OX-001-0271
Operation* 81t«
Oabit 01/01/M
typ.« rum
Autnori Bradwcoa, a KleaMdi us EPA
teclpiwts ooo>:
DocUMOt luatar: CXL-001-0294 TO 0293
TltO«i (Maao pr«»«irliig Stataa nport for tto
0>t«i 01/1C/M
att of U/OO/U)
Antnari Uow, irawtt Wt toil « NctwUl «ngln»«r« (MM!)
»nrt«r»on. Mundlth Clazkci a OA
OoeiOMBt VuMMTi OI-001-029* To OS«J
Tltlai Plnal Project OporatioM Plan Olinan Pltor*
nu
Cn-001-0397
facility ffrilltr.
01/31/M
ooo» toil « Mtarial
eiplaatt ooa>t 01 OA
OocuMBt fluaMwt CSL-001-0297 to 0297
Tltlai (tetter attaching th* flaaJ- frajtat opvatioaa POaa far tto aita)
Btt*f 01/31/M
Aattort Ctfttf,
>Bil •
(MM)
At
OA
-OMJ
OoeaMDt
Tltla-i (
CBr-«ei-«aU fa 0933
attaeaiaa toalt» aad tof*ex
Panoti OB»-001-O3*7
lafanHtien)
Oatvi 07/22/tl
Anttori toaa, MUiM Bi Pltor
Kaclpiaeti fiapaoB, Oary X>< *oil 4 MMrlal
-------
03/01/C9
Draft Xadac OocuMat
(QVIRAUI OBIT 2)
Pa_,
., OL-OOX-43M TO 03*7
oa/07/M
Tltlai (NMD raportlag OB •••Mug tald ea 01/30/86 oaac*ralag Maplia0 ud analytic*! proara for
invMtigatioa)
Author: lucla, aUrlvy: Soil « MatarlAl taglaMn
lUclpl«at: Aafenao, M*x«dltb Clarlwi 08 EPA
DacuMBt lu«b«r: CH-001-05M To 0391
(Z«tur •nMtfisiBg tlM wort oo Uu e»o/atelby JU/W for tlw
onuBmoncB
Authors Uav«r, «v«r«tt Wi 8oU • lUtarial tnglatutm (8MB)
TawBMDd, Ou« Dt !>• DA
D»t»i 02/11/96
of 01/00/M)
DaeuMBt *uab«r: OL-001-0592 To OS92
Titles (MMO dMcrlblog Sit* vuit Trip laport an 02/ll/*« ad
D*Ut 02/17/W
Typat Q'^iroTppBpBiirT
Author: DaJtoaa, Pati BC Oapt of
elpiaati fll»i BOB*
OL-001-0993
: CB-001-OS93 to OS93 tanati Ob-001-OS92
AB*ITM« taquMt (far OH* B«tU« propsrty)
tetvi 03/11/M
Typ»i DA3&
Author > OMOM. F«ti K Otft of
taelpiaati neaas
at matours Ott-OOl-OSM To 09M
TlU«i (X«tur ito«crminq vork an tte U/n «t tto «lt« dorlag tto
(MM)
MMl 03/04/M
of 02/00/M)
Author: Olovw, t»»r«t Vi Coil • Ntt*rlAl
I, OMM Di a 0*
TltO»i
C&-001-0997 Co 0997
«tt*cMac • uiai'ilMi of
t 03/04/M
dul«« 09/OS/M ad 02/M/M)
i Ctt-OOl-0997
/ /
Author i
I na 0A
-------
03/01/99
Draft Index Doeaaant f\mt*x Ordar
(CVBXAaU WIT 2)
fagas S
OocuMot VuatMr: 3L-001-OM9 to 0609 natat 03/10/M
Titlai (laxtax ancloaloa an aacacatad oopy of tha Adalolatratlva ortar for tha alta)
Typai
Author: ftavaa, Jack It Ul DA
Maclplaat: tDOWlaan, Suaaa P:
Attacbad: OL-001-0«10
Corporation
OocuMDt luabv: CB.-001-M10 TO 0621
Tltla: Ad*iniatrativ» Ordar oa Coaaant
Paranti OO-001-M09
Oatai 03/10/M
Typci UOAl
Autaori Mavao, Jack Bi 08 OA
Raclpianti ooaa: nooa
OoeuMOt mimtmii CTL-OOl-OCZZ To 062)
Tit la t (Maao f\um*xitlag ooMBialty raiatlona activitlaa to data)
Oatat 03/21/M
Typai
Autfiori AadarMO, nanditk Clarkai Ul DA
Melpiant: TOMwaad, Oaaa Ol DC DA
OoeoMBt luatoar: OL-001-M24 To Ml)
Tit la i C3DK3A Quality Control Ovwvlav Haport Calaaaaa FlMn •haiby,
Typa, KM
Aataari lloaa, rradi M DA
Raclpiaati noaai
Oatai / /
at luMMT! dt-001-0634 To 0*34
Tltlat (Cow lattar attaealog a oopy of a
Datai 03/ll/M
•papar articla datad OJ/2«/M)
Typai
Autaori Spaa0lar, Carl MI raianaai Corporatioa
Hacipianti ToMMod. Oaaa Di M DA
Attacoadi ClL-001-0633
Ooetvant
Tltla i (l
CH-001-MU TO MU
artlola tlUadi ••ail
0)/a»/M
Typai
Author! a.
•aclplaoti
«e our
Tltlai (Lattar oonflrmlflg 04/04/M
oonrarMtlen raoaroUoe IZ/TC
Da«ai 04/07/M
•t ta» al«a)
Typai
Author i Uarva, J Ai Pal anaaa cerparallon
Mclplaoti Tixiiaanl. Aaaa Oi OS DA
-------
03/01/19
Index Docnaant latter Center
(CFBMBU UIZT 2) nnroMenTi
Page: 6
nrmiB»nt Buaber: CHr-
-------
03/0l/t9
Draft Xadax DocuMat (cater Ontar
CKTJM181 (OPBUBLI UBXT 2) fin IIMIII
PM-, 7
OocuMOt tuatwi a&-00J>0*50 To MSI
Titlo: (L«tt*r ijMrrlhlng; to* ov*rvl«w alt* vi*it on 03/12/86)
T/pot OOXUSPQHDBCI
Author: Plore*, Jitlemy As Cup OrMMT < NcKM (COM)
Raclpiaat: ToMaaod, 0«n« P: US 0A
o*to« 04/30/46
DocuMat Vuatwr: Oft-001-0652 To 0700 Ptratl C1L-001-O653 Octtl OS/07/66
Titlai BnnHal XavMtla4tloB/r*MlMllty Study OWBight/TKhaleAl •apport Mark PI«D for COIMMM Piter Op«atloa aita
OrMMr c MCKM (C9M)
Typas PLAII
Autnor: Plate*, Jetttmy Ai
taelpiaati ooami ua DA
OocUMOt •uatwr: OX-001-0653 To 0654
Tlcl«! (Cov«r a«tt*r forwarOiaf Ovmnigbt «ad Tacfinlcml Support work Plan)
0*t«l OS/07/M
Author i Pi«rc», Jaffrwy At CMP Dma«r 4 NeKa* (ON)
taclplMt: TotAMod, Oaoi Oi (M KPA
AtUeMdt CB-001-0652 OL-001-0696 OO-001-0700
Dt lurtwr: C2L-001-0696 To 0696 Paxwti C&-001-06U
Tltl«: (Mao outlfylag no kBora eeofllct ot latuvat auoclatad with th> nark
Oatoi 03/21/M
Autftori Mcroa, Jttttwr At Cup OrMMr 4 NdtM (CM)
cipiontt CurciA, JoaatMD Oi CMV BrM««r 4 NcXM (OX)
PnriiMnt Vuatar: OL-001-0700 To 0700
tarwti ODV-001-06S3
O*t«i 03/09/M
Authors Unrtorann, Mtradlth Clartot 01 0A
taelpioati aaa*f Cap Or«B««r 4 nrffrrr (OM)
nt VtuMXi OBf-001-0701 to 0703
TlUat (L«tt«r •!!•
BM«l 03/OC/M
Typ«« a
OB tbo K/FS dnriag 04/00/M)
(MW)
Autaari Olow, l*Mp *i •all • MMflrUl
Mclplcatt TDMBMOd, •ijft'Ol OB 0A
<3L-001-C70*» CBp-O01-C707 Ofc-001-0709 Ctt-001-0711 CSb-«Ol-0733 O&-001-0734
Tltloi (
ab-001-0701 To 0703
«tt*cfcloo o*«ri*«r of
OS/1C/W
03/24/
03/26/M)
CoodiUOBi KIMZM
Aothort lloaa, Frcdt ta DA
••elplaati TovnaoBd, OMM Oi M 0A
-------
03/01/69
Draft urter Oocuaanx loBber Order
mzT 2)
Title: (Letter
I-O704 To 0709 Parent: OX-001-0701
iiiBMrtilnu verx eoHpleted during OS/00/66)
Autnari Clover, tverett Wt toll • Material Sngineera (SCMB)
Recipients Townaend, Qena Ot 08 DA
DaeuMot lUBber: OL-001>0706 To 0706
(MMO dMeribiag 06/23/«6 througb 06/25/W oversight iaMpocUoa «t sit*)
Typ.i
DBK3
Author: Hllsao, n»«rl«« It
Melplaat: Piwe*, Jeffrey At
Dr*«>«r « Mela* (ON)
DXMMT 4 MeXee (OM)
Document HuBber: CXL-001-0707 To 0706 Parent: dL-OOl-0701
Title: (Letter «uae*rixlag «ork coipleted during 07/00/66)
Type: OORRKSPQRDOCB
Author: Carter, Larry: toil 6 Material logiaeera (SCMI)
Recipient: Tomaend, fleaa Dt 06 0A
OoBBaeat miaber: CH-001-0709 To 0710
Pareati C&-001-0701
Title« (letter •UBaarlxlng «ork eoipleted during 06/00/H)
Type:
Author: Olover, Iverett V: ton • Material bgineen (MM)
taelpieot: TcwnMnd, Oeaa Ot m 0A
POM: •
Date: 06/05/S6
Date: 07/01/M
Date: M/Ot/M
Date: Ofl/10/66
Doetvent •ober: CSL-001-0711 To 0711 Parenti Ott-001-0701
Title: (letter •aaMTlxlag work eoepleted during 09/00/66)
Author: Oliver, Everett V: toil 6 Material toglaean (MM)
Recipient: Tomeend, Oeoa D: OS 0A
Date: 10/10/66
at luMber: CSL-001-07U To 0712
Title: (Heao ooaf iralng a eoBTanctioa reamrding the cuheittal of
Date: 10/14/66
Peaaihility 6tady)
Type:
Author: tocia, Shixleyi toll •
elpient: TouBeeod, toaa Pi OB •
•nglnean (64MI)
Dt »
Title: (Me
Type:
Authors
Recipient!
13 «e 07JO
ZT««te •• eplit
totai 10/3J/66
lee)
, Charlie: » VA
oaea Ot OS VA
-------
03/01/M Draft Inoax Duuuaaut tmtmi Oroar rmjms 9
(OPBUUI ORT 2) DoctaHota
Dociaont mbar: CB-001-4731 so 0731 Qataj 10/31/M
Tltlai (lattar aocloalaa varloua alta raporc* and raaulta of Inorganic analyse* of veil and •orCaea vatar a*«pla>)
Typo:
condition: naaaa
Author: Noor«, Ban: US D>A
Raetplwit: P»rry, Ooug: Clavaland, 1C, Cooaty of
Donavit luabar: on,-001-0732 To 0733 Paraati OL-001-0701 Data: 12/09/M
Tltlct (Latter siMMrlslag wort eoBplctad during 11/00/M)
Aut&or: Olovmr, tvamt Vi SoU « Natarlal bglaMn (MNI)
Raelplaat: Moor*, Ban: U8 XPA
Doc;aaat luabar: CCL-001-0734 To 0734 Parmoti OCL-001-0701 Oatci 01/10/i7
Tltlai (Lattar «ii»i«rliUg work eooplctad durlAg U/OO/M)
Typa< aoraianmaicx
Authori taroaa, John Ci Soil • Natarlal laglnaan (UMt)
Raciplanti Moora, Bans U8 IPA
at Ruabart OB.-001-073J To 0733 Oatai 03/04/I7
Tltlai (lattar '-'-j wort coiplatad daring 01/00/>7)
Typa:
Autnort Olovar, kVaratt Vt SoU « Matarlai taglaava (MM)
taelplaot: Noora, Bani ua DA
Attachad: OL-001-0744 dL-001-0730 C&-001-M11
at luabar: OL-001-0736 To 073« Oatai 03/U/t7
Tltlai (tattar aaeloalag atataa raporu fro*' 10/00/M to 03/00/r? aad roulMOlty ready Work flan)
Typat
condition i Nzuaa
Autaor: Noora, Bani U« OA
Maeiplanti Lavoodar, Jaeklai Calanaaa Corporation
t luatoart OL-001-O737 To 0)37 Batoi 03/12/t7
Tltlai (lattax annlnalBf cutw raporta aad raaeiMllty atady wort Ilao for ropooltocr)
Typai
Condltloni KlaalM
Aotaori Nooro, BOB I :j_ti BVA
Raclplants forry, Ooof»i OawaJaML BV, Coooty of
ot •near: dZ>-001-O73C To 073* Oatan Oa/lt/t7
TlUai (latter atatlng that toara ara no oooBaota on too PaaalMllty ttady «tark rlaa at tkia tln»)
Typa I CCflRBKaVBVCB
Aatnori awailow, Jona Ai 1C Oopt of toBan Raaooreaa
•aelplant: Noora, Bani (W 0A
-------
03/01/99 Draft ladas Oocuaant timbu Order Pa»»i 10
(OPKRABLI 0*11 3) "-
Bt VUBBBri Oa-OOJ-0739 To 0740 OttBf 02/23/97
Tit a* i (HMO pr«««irlng aoBBMt* aa th* draft RI aad Analytical Data taporu datad 1996)
Typa: aUUUWOBBCS
Author: PlctroMvie*, CaniBw V: Agency far Teaclc 9u>>«tano»« c DIWMM togl*try (AMD*)
Jtaclpiant: Maorv, Ban: US DA
at tUBb«r: Cd-001-0741 TO 0747 Oitat 02/2(/S7
Titles (L«tt«r previdlag oe^Hot« on th« Draft JU)
Authori MOOT*, Ma: 1U OA
taclpiaati l«t«3 durlafl 02/00/17}
Author: OIov«r, fvantt Wt tell < Material toglaMrs (MW) -
Mclpiant: Hoar*, taai U« KPA
DacuBiot IUBb«r: 00^-001-0749 To 0749 Oawi 03/09/97
Titlat (Lvttar atplaXalag luparfuod AaaadMuu aod Mauthorlcatioa Act of 1M4 - lUM - aad MBeongl^ oenuet «ith
9A to diacuu lapKt of
Typ«i
Author: Tobla, Patrick J: Of OA
taeipiaoti Pullan, JAM* Ci r«lin«ti Corporation
DoctMBt BuBbari 00-001-0730 To 0790 Panot: Ott-001-0733 Oat«i 04/10/97
Tltl«< (iMtu •umarlsiaa vark ca»pl«t*l on th« KI/P« darlag 03/00/97)
Author: alow, *v«Mt Vi tell • Natwial bgloMr* (MM)
taelplut: ltoor», too: U9 0A
OoeiaMBt futt»r: OB.-001-07S1 To 0753 0*t*i 04/24/97
Tltl«i (Mtur forwardlag to VblOB* 1 and XI of draft II with OOBMOU fica* B»)
Author: Jtaroa*, JOBS Ci flail • ItofiBdAl BnglBMn (94M)
Mcipioat: NOOTB, •*•!-:•• «n
atb-001-07O» nft-OOI-OOOl C9JL-001-090S
-
it VoBtw: Otb-001-«rS3 «o OtOS Panat: OH-001-O7J1 OBtBl 09/01/97
TltU: final P^aiillitr fltaoy •or* PlM ruiiiMH PUMn
Typ*i PUM
Aathori alow, trmrttt Vi tell 4 Natarlal tng)ii»«rt (CAB*)
OOBBI IM 9»A
-------
03/01/C9 Draft tad** Docnaant luahar Ortar P4_, n
(oraRAnix URT 2)
at Kuban OL-OOr-MOl To M04 Paraot: OL-OOl-0731 Data: 12/11/M
Tltlai (Lattax ia»anr1ng oo taa Faa*lAillty Study Mark Plan)
Typat
Authors Moor*, Mot OX IP*
Raclplant: Olovar/ tv«rrtt Vi Sell * tutorial tnglraan (S4MI)
Dacuaaot ITuaMri OB.-001-MOS To 0109 P*ruti <3t-001-07Sl 0«t«i U/19/M
Tltlat (L«tt«r with eanaat to add to list Mllad oo U/ll/M)
Typat ODJOOaiOBDBiai
Author: Moor*, Bant US IPX
tv«r«tt W: aoll
Doc««nt WuatMTl OL-001-0406 To 0«10 DaUt M/27/i7
Titla: (L«tt*r •rplAinlag «o «rror aad* oo original For* 1 tar M>pl« OW-017)
Author i necord, Jobo •: 0«vi« c Floyd
Olov«r, fv«r»tt Wi aoll « Hit«rl*l tBgiaaor* (SMI)
Oocuaant Vuabar: OL-001-M11 To 0«11 Paran«: OL-001-073S Data: 09/ll/«7
Titla: (l«ttar anaairiling «ork coiplatad during 04/00/17)
Typoj ooxmtaPOaDDO
Author: Olovar, tvaratt Vt Soil • Natarial Inginaan (SiMI)
•acipiant: Noora, Bant us 0A
Ol^-OOl-oaia To MU Oatai OS/14/t7
for tha RX raport and aobmittal of Final KZ
Typoi
Author: Lucia, lnirl«r: tell • Mtarlal tagiaoan (
Mcipiaat: Naora, Baoi IU OA
at laabar: 01-002-0001 To 03*3 Oatai M/01/t7
Tltlai Final naaiillil lovaatioatloa laport Wolnaa I - Tart, Tabla* aod Fl«araa
Typat ruui
Coodltion: MaMOOLZa
Author: Barooa, Joam Ci tail • Mn*zi«l lnglnamr« (MIC)
eiplaati ooaat U
IM »o OTTf Datai M/Oi/VT
Titlai Final «aa»11U XxravUgatloo papore, Appanrt.lT Voloa) I,
Typai PUI
Condition i MJBOUZA
Author: •aroaa, John Ci •oil • Notarial tnglnaan (MM)
Kaetpiaati oooai (U OA
Attacttadi (3L-002-02H dL-002-02»0 CH-O02-030S CSL-OO2-01O* OK-402-OJOT O&-009««XM Ob-002-OJU
01^002-0312 Ot-002-OJ27 Ofc-002-0321 OI-OO2-0332 Ofr-003-OJJT OL^Q2-O)39 OI-002-O340
OL-002-0342 OI-003-0344 OS~002-034« OI.-O02-0331 OL-003-OJS9 . Ofc-OQa-03S7 Ot-002-OJ5«
OL-002-03«1 OB,-002-03«3 Ofc-002-03«5 OI.-O02-O344 OL-003-OJM OL-OO2-4J70
OL-002-0372 OI.-002-O373 OL-002-OJ74 OI-002-037J
-------
03/01/M
Draft ladaac Docoaant inDar Qrdar
urrr 2}
Page: 12
at
Titlet (M
bar: Ctt-OC2-03M to 02M
foiwardiaa Caaeent
Parant: CB-002-02S4
Data i 07/30/M
it)
Type i oomuponna
Author: Moaa, Williaa •> Plbar Xadaatrlea
Recipient: Olover, Iverett HI Soil t Material Engineer! (UMI)
DociBMOt Inaberi OC,-002-0290 To 0)01
Titi« i Maiairtrativ* Oxdar on COM ant
Typ»« LlOftl DOCIMBR
Auttors itavaa. Jack It 08 DA
toelpicnt: Ui*giU«i C*I*BM« Corporation
Paxvoti 3L-002-02M
Oatai 03/10/96
Docuaant luabar: (3L-002-030S To 0309 Paraatt OL-002-02M Oatai 01/11/A3
Tltlat (Lettar raquaatiag part • of applieaUon for basardoua waste facility for •torag* oootaiaan)
Typat comiapoiDna
condition: icsanro AirwaMnrr '
Author: Strickland, 0 Wi K Dapt of BUMB Ilaaourcaa
taeipiaat: Braat. Oaorya: ribar Induatrlaa
OacaMnt luatoer: OL-002-0306 To 030C Parent: OL-002-03M Oatai 04/lf/a3
Tltlat (Maao ~g-""-g requaat la latter dated Ol/ll/U for Part • permit application)
Typat
Author: BOH, VUllaa Bt Piter Xadaatriaa
eipiaatt atricklaad, 0 Wi BC Oept of Boaan Baaourcaa
ot InaMri CB-002-0307 To 0307 Paraoti C«L-002-C2M
Tltlat (Mttar forvardiag Parait I724U datad 10/U/I3 and aball void 17341)
Oatat 10/12/U
Type:
Author i Balaa, ftobart ft K Dapt of lateral Baaoarcaa •
clpiaatt MOM, Williaa Bt Pisar ladaaxrlaa
Oooaant iraMbart 00-002-030* To 0310 Paraett OL-002-03M
Tltlat PaiBlt for tba Dlaefearaw of flaavga, Zadoatrial Maataa, or Otter
Oatai 10/U/U
Typat IM1
Author t lalaa
Baclpiaati aoaai
•Moral
at •uaber:
Tltlai (letter forwardtag
«0 0311
Paraoti C&-002-03M
Oatai 03/01/as
It)
Author: vil«a. a Paul: BC Dapt of lataral
Mclplaeti Pullaa, Jaaaa Ct Calaaaaa CarporaUoo
-------
03/01/19
Draft lodaac Doeuaaat Boater Order
(oranuu u»» 2)
13
at BnaMffi CSL-O03-0312 to 032* Parent* CXL-002-O3*4 Data i 03/01/15
Tltlai Permit to Oiaoaaxv* «fc*tawat«r Oader tte Batiooal Pollutant Dlacharg* Bllalaatiaa
Typei LiaAJ,
Author: VIIJM, II F«ali K Dapt of Urtnral KMOUTCM « r •nnli1
oaa§< 'C«l«n««« Corporatloa
at Ruaber: OD.-002-0327 To 0327 Parent) O&-002-02M Oatei 04/04/M
Title: (Letter forwarding Permit 13734X4 for dlacharye of air coBtaaiaaata into ata
AutUori WlM, • PuUi K 0«pt of natural KMOUTCH c Co«unlCy
Boelplwit: MayroM, V C: Calaaa** Corporation
DocoMOt BuBbar: CTL-002-0321 To 0331 Parwrei aBr-002-02M
TltOai Air P«rmit far tte Dlaebar?* of Air Coaravinaata Into tte Ataoapbar*
Typ*t UOAL Docuwirr
Autaor: Vila*, * Paul: K D«pt of latoral taaourcaa i CoajBuOty 0«v«lopMBit
lUcipiant: OOIMI Calaaaca Corporation
/ /
OoetaMOt luabari CXL-002-0332 To 0336
Tltl»j (L«tt«r forvarding •odificatioaa to
Paraati CXL-002-02M
P«rmit IK 004952)
01/13/M
DBCX
Author i V1UH, II PanlJ K Oapt of latural &HoorcM < riaainlij Dwr*l
, WlUiaa Bi Piter laduatxiaa
Oocnaaat Vuacwri CB1-002-0337 So 0337
Tit la i (HMO attaching tto fiaal BPOH pumit)
Panoti OL-003-02M
Out»t 04/11/U
Typ»t
Condition i touiiro AJTOCBtDT
Authori Pullan, Jaa»* ci
Kacipiaati oonai illaglhla
Corporation
DociaHCt «u«b«r: C&-002-033S To 033«
Titloi (X«ttar rmaffirmlag that
Pazwti O&-002-02M
to fila • Pan • applioatio»
03/02/M
typ«» a
Condition i MM
Author i Milan, • 0(- ralanain OBiuaratiaa
taclpiaoti Btrieftlad* ••«! K Bapt of
Titlat (letter atfvlAiag taat plait fee*
Paracti OL-002>43M
aad all ta* ta»11i»Tl»»M)
i OB/17/M
Author i •tridUaad, 0 «t aC oapt of
eipiaoti Jtaoa, nillaa Bi Plhvr
-------
03/01/19
Draft late oocownt IOOMT Order
(CHRABU UKT 2) ooew
Pwai 14
at toeeert Ott-002-0342 To 0343
Tltlei (tetter inaiarlilny nor* perfi
Pareati CKL-O02-02A4
during U/00/S9)
Data: 01/16/M
Typei
Author: Clover, Iverett Wi aeU i Material Z&glneeri (S«KI)
Recipient: Aadanwo, Itondittt Clarlwi ua IPA
Ooetaant luab«r: CKL-002-0344 To 0347
Titles (t«tt«r •UMMrlsiag Merk darlag Ol/OO/M)
Faxvat: OL-002-02S4
0*t«i 02/11/M
9yp*t OOMUtSPOKDWCl
AuOiori Olov«r, lv«r«tt Vi leU < Material tegiaeeri (SMI)
taclpieati XoMuead, Oena Di 08 IPA
OocuMBt AiMberi CXL-002-0344 To 0350
Titler (tetter preMntlaff 02/00/M Statue Xeport)
Parent! OX-002-02M
Batet 03/04/M
Type i COMUESPO00CI
AutBor; Olover, Iverett vt soil • Material to0laeer« (SCMI}
Xeelpieot: ToMBeead, Oeaa Oi US IPA
Document •uaberi OL-OOJ-0331 To 0394
Title: (letter •UMMrixlag 03/00/S6 Statue taport)
Type i ff^ffliffpfilPCT^**
Auttors larone, John Ct Soil « Material
Recipient: Toimaead, Oeaa Oi OS IPA
Parent i
(SAW)
002-02M
Batei 04/OS/M
Dacaeent lueberi CIL-002-035S To 0394
Tltlei (tetter providing 04/00/S9 Statae Mepert)
Pareott OOr-003-02S4
Datei 04/OS/M
Types
Author: Olover, Iverett «i Soil • Material togineer* (SeMI)
Recipient: Tcweeod, Oeaa Di OS »A
OoctoMot Vuebar:
Titlei (tetter
Typei COM
002-0397 To 039S
tiag 09/00/M
Parent i Ot-OOa-03M
Statae Report)
Aataor: Carter, taxzyt Soil S MMarlal
elpieet! Itmeead, Oeea Bi OS e*ft
Betei OS/09/SS
Pareoti OL-OM-oaM
OeyoO/M
,
Antaori Carter, Larryi Sell -s Material •nglaeera (SM)
•eelpieett Tuxneeiiri. Oena Di OS 0A
Oetei 07/07/M
-------
01/01/69 Draft indA Docua»nt lumbar Ordar Pam, i«
rTTACTil (OPBUail OBIT 2) - —
DocaMBt later i CZb-OOa-0361 To 0363 Farant: OL-002-02M Datat 06/06/M
Titlai (L«ttar amain ting nark oe*pl*tad daring 07/00/66)
Typo I
Authori Carter, Larry i fcll « Material IngiaMr* (&&KB)
Baclpiant: TcwnMad, Owu D: Ufl DA
•uBter: OO.-002-0363 To 0364 Pamrti OBb-002-0264 Oatat 09/10/66
Tltlci (L«ttar auiBarising work coBplctad daring 06/00/66)
Auttert Wow, ivarctt Wi toil • Material KogloMr* (8«MS)
taelplsat: To«B«aad. Quo* Di 08 DA
DoeuHot lu*b«r: CXL-002-0363 To 0365 Parvat: OD>002-0264 Datai 10/10/M
Titla>i (l«ttar au»arislng wort eoaplMad during 09/00/66)
Authori Olov«r, tv«r«tt Vt Soil • *Ut*ri*a tagiaaws (UNI)"
••clpiut! TCMBavad, Oaaa Di IM DA
Oociaoot luMbari CXI-002-03M To 0367 Paraoti C&-002-0264 Oatat 11/10/66
Tltlat (lattax aoMarixing work eoBpl*t«d daring 10/00/66)
Author> Olovar, «w«r«t Wi (oil « iutarl«a toglaMn (MM)
taelplaati Noon, »«nt UI DA
at DwtHjr: OO-002-03M To 03M Panett C&-002-oaM Oatai U/Of/M
Tltlai .(Lvtur '-'-jj work eo*pl«t«d daring 11/00/66)
Autfteri Olorw, Ivwtt Wi aeil • itottflal toglaMn (MM)
taclpioat: Noon, B«DI IM DA
DeevMnt mat*r: CBL-003-0370 To OJ70 Panact OO-002-0364 MtMi 01/10/66
TitlMt (t«tt«r 4-*-g •ark —r1**"* daring 12/00/6* and pianaad aetlTitiM ear 01/00/67)
Typvi ODV
Author: Baroo*. Joba Ct 6uU 6 MMKUI taginaw* (64MI)
ciplanti Moor*, ftasi OB DA
at laibtfi HI OaflHTI So 0171 Panoti O&-O02-O364 Oat»i 03/09/67
Titian (Lcctar •BKMXiafiki wnck iiiBijlMag daring 01/00/67)
Typot
Author i fllow, fnrwtt Vi 6011 6 MtarLtl toglnMn (SAM)
•aclpiasti Moan, MBI M DA
-------
03/01/99
Draft indox Docoau
t later Qroar
(HIT 2)
Fag*: 16
r-0172 to 0373
Parwrti OL-002-02M
Datai 03/06/67
Titl*i (L«tt«r •[[••riling vork eoBpl«t«d during 02/00/87)
Typt* tnmu •• pi-'itrir<*f
Author: olov«r, Iv«r*tt Vi toil • Malarial inglnoarB (UMB)
Racipiaat: Moor*, B«n: US DA
DocuBont luabor: dX-002-0373 To 0373
•uaaarixiag work
FC6BHO
OL-002-02M
taut 04/10/M
Autbor: Olov«r, tv*r«tt Mi ton 4 lUtarUl
JUclpianti Neon, tail oa 0A
during 03/00/67)
(MM)
ot luabvi OX-002-0374 To 0374 Parati OL-002-02M
Titlai (IiMtar auaaarislng work cowplotad during 04/00/67)
Authori aiovar, •vonct Wi toil 4 Malarial •agioaars (MM!) "
tacipiaats Moor*, Moi US 0A
Oat«i 05/10/«7
OL-002-0373 To 0376 Par«rti CSb-002-OaM
Titles (L«ttar •uBBarlsiag wsrt ct«pl«t«l during 09/00/67)
Mt*i 06/M/67
Typ»«
Auuori Blovar, Ivmrvtt tfi toU 6 IUt«rtal tagiaMr* (Mm)
Mclplaatt OI«BB, MlcaaUai U» 0A
t
flnai
OL-002-0777 to 1099
InrwtlgatloB
06/22/rr
Appmndlx Volia* II
* throogh •
Typai PLAI
CODdltlon: MUUZULIA
Author: Baron* , Joan C< toil 6 NatMiAl Inglnaw* (M«)
noMi U« 0A
OOV-002-1100 CB.-003-1491 CBt-002-1452 CB.-002-1453 O&-003-14S4
-1496 CBr-002-1623
at •nabart CBL-OOa-1100 To 1490
TiUai Appaodiz F
Pazvoti Ot-002-0777
Authori aooai
Baciplaatt 000*1
TltOat AppanrtU g
Aataori noaot
»ar«eti CB>-002-«777
i / /
-------
03/01/M
Draft Indaat Docuaant loHbar
(CMMAaLt WIT 2)
at Hater: CBr-a03*>14U To 1432 Panat: OL-002-0777
Tltla: (L«tt*r aocloalag fiaal data oa project I1175-85-10SOA)
(9418)
typaj
ceediuao: KIM no
Autaar: NcCord, John Hi Oavla t Floyd
Raclplut: Luela, 3Mrl«yi Soil c lUt«rl«l
Docuaaot JTuiter: (3L-002-14S3 To 14S3
Titlai
Parvnt: ODr-002-0777
for l«tt*r d«t«d
Autiari MeCord, Jobo at Dmvim » Floyd
Bwlpirati Lucia, SMrl«yi toll C M«t«i*l toglMwv (84MI)
DoctBMDt luabar: OL-002-1434 To 1499
Paxaati
•002*0777
Paoci 17
u/10/M
11/10/M
Oatat 10/23/M
Titlaj (tattar atating tnat all laboratory aaalyvaa conducted by Oarla • Floyd, loo aad Trlaaala Ub la
llac of daflciaoeiaa la aaalycleal rcaulta)
vitb
Aatbori NcCord, Joba •: Oarla • Floyd
Kaclplant: Luela, •blrlayt Boll • Natarlal lnotn«ar» (04MI)
OOCOMDC Vuotwri OKL-002-14S6 To 1621
TJtiai Appaodlx II Orouadwatcr Saapla Collaetlon 3
Typ«: FUW
Aatbori ooaa> ooo«
taelpiaati oooa: BOJM
O&-002-0777 Oat«i / /
02/09/M
f~ BMDt VuatMTi O&-002-U22 TO IMff
Titlaj Appaadlx fl Haaltb aad torlriiiaairil «ffaeta
Typwt VLal
Itaelplaati aoa»i aoo*
Faraoti O&-002-0777
Oaui / /
Tltlai (
n 0&-OOJ-0001 To 0001
o«««i oc/aa/t?
Tltlai (Lcttar forvardlag ttaal
Typai
Aatbor: Batlar, Barry Pi Caap Px
Baclplaot: ¥a«t]«e, laaai W Oa
AttactMdt (3L-003-OOOJ
ipt of tte Public
(CBN)
fiatat U/U/17
fiMn OpvatldM •!«•,
-------
03/01/19
Draft iad*x
Oro*r
BUT 2)
r»g»: It
To 0111 Paraoti QO-003-0002 Datai 07/21/rr
Tltl*i Final Baport - TSBBBerlpt of ta* Fublic Navtiag - r*lin*»j FlMra Op*ratloaa Sit* BBBiillil lavwtlaatloo
Typ*t puur
Author: boyld,. Sbaroa Li Buo* Allan I Hamilton
Racipianti oonai US 0A
Ruabar: CTL-003-0112 To 0116
Tltl«i fact ahMt - CTO aupszfuad Sit* r oparatloa 01 Sit*
of Saalth t Iwao
i 07/90/1
-------
03/01/19
Draft indaoi Oocoaaat Hater Oroar
(OF0AUI OIZT 2)
Paoai 19
M To 1107
Titlai Final Faaalflillty ttoly ftaport - Oparahla Unit 3 - Soon* notarial
• Carolina - VoioM li Mart, Appaadlcaa I Throng* III
Typa« PLM .
Author i Mays. Mienaal Xi loll 4 Matarlal Kaginaara (MM)
aaclpianti DODa: Ufl IPA
Attachad: OL-003-07M CH-003-OM4 OL-003-0411
Oatai 01/Ol/tf
ral maaa Facility, ftelAy, lorefe
DoeiBHOt luab«r: C3X-003-07M To M03
Tltlai Appandia I Analytical Data
Typa: PIM
Autbors aoaai nee*
taclpiaat:
Faraoti OL-003-OSM
Datai / /
at IIUBMri 00-003-0(04 To 0*17
Titlat Appaadix II Riak Aaaaanaot Data
Typat KM
Aatfiar: oon*t nona
toclplaat: ooaat oooa
ParaotJ dL-003-0394
Datat / /
Cai-003-0«H To 1107
Tltlai Appaodlx lilt Final tapanrtart OiaractarliatioB Itady - Olycol
PaeUlty, analby, larta Carolina
Pacvrti OL-003-OS94 Oatai 01/01/M
Unit alodga and »a» Fit
Typa.
Authori aoaat nona
eiplaoti nonai DOB*
CXL-003-110* To 14M
Tltlai Final Faaaibility «tody laporc - Oparanla unit 2 - •ooze* Malarial -
Carolina - VoloBa> 2i AppaodicMa, Appandicaa IV, A ttroagb C
i 01/OI/M
Facility,
Typai
Author: Maya, Mienaal Xt Mil • MatacUl BsgiMan (HMD
Raclpiaat: noaai IM 0A
Attaehadi CXt-003-110t CZL-003-U10 dL-OOJ-1220 C&-O03-U3*
n CBr-001-UM 10 UW
Tltlai Appaadlx XT
- Biological
Carolina
Typa. FLW
Authort Dooat
taclplaati ooeat
DocoHDt VBMMTI C&-003-L210 to U1J
Titlat AppamlU A Faotoffrapaa
Typai FLU
Authori nooai aooa
•aciplaeti nooai aona
Faraeti C«fc-OOJ-UO«
it //
-------
Draft lodax Docuaaat loaficr Order
*•"*«—«- (OraUULI WIT 2) I'll [••in
at laBfcari C&-OOJ-U20 to IMS
Tltlat Appaadlx • DaUy fcag»
Typai FUtf
Haclpiut: aoaai BOM
ParaBti OL-003-11M
Oocuaaot •uabar: OL-003-1336 To 1489
Tltl«: Appudlx C Kieroteoc
Typat PtM
Aucfior: BOM! nea«
taclplMitt
OO-003-11M
20
Data i / /
/ /
tatti 01/01/M
rcelUty, Cteltoy, terra
OEL-003-1490 To 1931
Tltlai Final reaalblllty Study Report - Operable Unit 2 - Searea Material -
Carolina - Volu»a 3: Appaadlcaa, Appaadleaa IV, D aad I, V Thrown XX
Typai ma
Author: Maya, Mleaael Xi Soil • Material ftigtneera (SAME)
Recipient: aoaat US BM
AttacBadi CB.-003-1491 CH-003-1M1 CXL-003-l«47 OB.-003-1M3 C&-003-1S99 OK-003-1902 OBr-O03-1914
Doeuaaat •uabari CB-003-1491 To 1S40
Titlei Appaadlx D Laboratory Analytical Data
Typai PLAI
Autaori aoaai aooe
Recipient: aoaei
Paraoti OtL-OOJ-1490
Oatai / /
at fiabfti OL-003-1S41 *O 1S44
Titles Appaadix • CaleiUatioa Irlafa
Typai PLAI
Autaor: DOM: BOB*
Raclplaoti aoaa: aon*
Oatat / /
at BUMri OO-003-1S47 TO ISM
Tito*i Appaadix V vat Air Oxidation
Typai fLal
AutAors aoaai aaaa
taelplaati aoaai aoaa •:
Datai / /
Titiai Appaadlx VX
IMS SB 1S*4
rareati CBL-003-l4tO
ii //
ration Report
Typai HA*
Aataort Bacberehla, 0 Hi
taciplaott aoaai Soil • Natacial
-------
03/01/S9 Draft laoex Document, ftmtmi Order Faoei 21
nrjurmr tonuui own jj
at tiatoari OBr-009-lfH To 1901 Fareat: C&-003-1490 Datei 10/U/M
Title: Appendix VII University of Central Florid* Incineration Report
Type: FLAV •
Author: Claueea, Chrlatlant Oaivenlty of Cvatral Florid*
taeipl«at: DOO«: Soil < M>t«rl*l laginamn (SCMI)
Oeetaaot IUBb«r: CXL-003-1903 To 1913 P«r»nt! OB^003-1490 Mtti 11/11/M
Tltlct AppMdix VIII TrMtftbllity Study taport
Typst FLAM
Author! DOM: Kltar A«*ocl«ta«, Inc.
toeipiaatt aoasi Haatiagboua*
Ooeuacot luatwr: Ot-003-1914 To 1931 P«z«ati OO-003-1490 tat«! / /
Title i AppMdix IX Alternative Coat Calculation*
Typei FLAM
Authori nonei nooe •- .
•aclpiaats aoaei oooe
Ooeoeot Vuaber: OL-003-1932 To 1934 Oatet 01/11/M
Title; (Cover lettar traaamlttlag the fiaal draft Faaaihllity Stady Beporc)
Type >
Author i Oleon, Klcbellei US DA
taeipieati CroaDy, Leet K Oept of IIBMB Heeoorcee
tssmtot mumtiuet OL-003-193J To 193S aatet oa/07/H
Title i '(Letter eutMittiag coieBata OB the Feaalbillty Study
Typei
Authori Mayroee, M C: rel>neee Oorporatioa
taeipieat: Qleaa. Nlehellei US DA
Attached i OL-003-1937
Doeweot ItietMr: dL-003-1937 To 1*37 tareoti C&-003-U33 Oewi 01/U/M
Title i (X«tter eetiaatlag ooeta for leaeillil aervieee)
Typei
Authori Dvfeee,
Deeipientt
•.rf
ootai ea/et/M
Flea feat Skeet)
tttag th» OperaMe Bkit Two Feaalaillty stady
Typei
Authori eallahan, Fraaoeet Caap Oreaeer • MdCae (OM)
•ecipieat! larvell, Baeei Hi BM
Attaebedi 31^003-1940
-------
03/01/99
Draft Inane Ooaamat Boater
WIT 2)
Pagw: 22
I Cft-003-1940 TO 1944
Parent i OtL-003-1939
Data: 02/04/99
Titles Operable unit Two Peaalaillty Ctody aad Propoaed Plan Pact abeet • "rl mm ribera operation* aite - Cleveland
County, Bortn *»••>'«--
Typei PUkl
Authors Uoyd, abaran Is Boos Allen 4 •—"»—
taclpleat: aones aone
DecuMat BUMMT: OL-003-1947 To 1944
Title < (X«tt«r •upportiag Be*ebat C«lan«M't
Oatei OJ/04/49
naadial approach to Oparmbl* Obit THO)
aomaPODBfCB
Jkutiiari CaldtMll, Dea It C*lana«> Corporatien
taelpicati Olaon. MlcteUai 01 OA
Attacbcdi CH-OOi-1949
Dmiaant Buibcr: CXL-003-1949 To 1933
Titl«i (Btata of aoutH Carolina
la taa atat«)
Parantj «L-003-1947
lv* Otter «o. 49-03
Oatei 01/14/99
tteataaat aad dlapoeal facllltlee
Types LSOU. D3CUMBT
Autnors caapbell, Carroll A, Jrs SC, atate of
Baclplents aeaei
t liutMrs CIL-003-19S4 To 19S4
Titlai (Lattar nj«etlag loaelwt
oatat 02/09/H
•a prafsmea for off-alu laclaaratloa)
ABtAors Olana, Mieaonot 01 0A
taelpiaati NayroM, M Ci Ca3 anaiio Corporatlaa
C&-003-19S5 TO 1933 Dates 03/09/99
Titles (Preaa relaaee ammnrylna a pablle BeeTing to ne bald on Pebnary It, 1409)
Typoi
Autaart
elpiaati
•i M VA
it
at VuatMri CXL-003-USC To 1994
Titian (Innnnnnoiait of tfco r«bnM>y I
Oatai oa/09/9*
I*** pobUe
CTOB tfeB flkaOfer Mar)
Typai
Anttars
ciplaati
Tltloi (
t CB^003-19S7 To US?
la of lattar aaat to
ami oa/io/9*
ttiaa a poalie
ABtoor: Lloyd, Baaroa X,i Booa Allaa 4 BaBOItaa
Bacipiavti ClaBBMT, Ooaaai SaaUvy atar
Attacaed! CH-003-1934 dt-O03-19«0
-------
03/01/M
Draft
it lotbar Qroar
uizx 2) r—IMIH
23
t tatari C*L-ae»-193« To 1939 Parwrti OO-OOJ-19S7
(Hat of Mdla npraMBtatlvw r*e*lviag copi*« of taa public ••rriiig
Typ.i
Author: HOD*t M OA
taclplaot: 000*1 BOB*
Docaont IO^MT: CTL-003-1960 To 1960
Tltlot (AaaouaeaMont for UM poblle
Typot OIBIX
Autnori ooa* t US OA
neaoi DOB*
P«raati CH-003-19J7
to bo bold robniary l», 1M9)
Dat*i 03/10/M
OocuMOt RuatMr: CB,-OOJ-1961 To 1961
Tltlot *SPA to Addroaa Claaaup of Hazardous Waata aita* (artlel* txvm Tto analby «tar
Datas 02/11/M
CLIPPOIO
Author: ClaMor, Oonaai 800107 Star
Raclplant: aoooi OOP*
-------
5E CORJP SHELBY
FIBER OPERATIONS
(OPERABLE UNIT 2)
NPL SITE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
DOCUMENTS !E>RIOR TO
—OO3—OS94 CAJSI BE FOUND IN
THE OCTOBER 6, 1988
AJDMINXSTiRA.TIVE ItECORJD FOR
OPERABLE UNIT 1
-------
03/01/19
Draft lute auaaelagleal Order
WIT 2)
OoeuMot Voatwrt O&-0O1-0170 To 0170 Panats OL-001-007S ttatei / /
Titles (MMO r»g«rMnq to be oo Mlllagi li*t for information OB cite with hjuuVrtrtao note)
Author i JibM, OoaiJd f i r
Jtaclplaat: ca«rk«, MwcdltJ) ts Uf DA
DacuMDt
: CC.-001-039I To 060»
topart
ttnati CBr-001-0597
/ /
Typ*i PUUT
AutAari noa*i Uf KTA
elpituiti
OOCIOHOC muttMr: CXL-001-0624 To Ot33
Vltlei aaOJi gwllty Control Owvlaw taport C*Uo«M flten
Typ«i ruur
Aiittar: Sloan, Fzwdt U8 tPA
taclpiwitt nan* i
/ /
DocuMat luataur: Ctt-002-032* To 0331 MiMtt
Tltl«t Air taixlt for tte 01*ch*rfl» of Air CoatMlaiau Into tte A
xyp«: LIQU ux-uMurr
Autnori WllM, II F«ul: K Oapt of Mtnr«l »aiourco» «
••eiplsnti noa*i C«I«MM Corporatloo
/ /
DociMOt luaovt Oa-OOJ-llOO to 1450
fltla: AppMdlx 9 MdlMat Aaaly«l«
RJUT
I
i
Vanoti OO-Ooa-0777
a*t»i / /
Dt liurtwri O&-OOJ-1431 to 14S5
Title i AppMdlx Q
typ«i nw
AntJuri aooat
»««etl C«t-O02-0777
OM*| / /
at vuaberi e
Title: Append!* •
Typei ntM
Aattart oooei
•MM SB i»31
CBXlerUea *i
CXU-002-O777 On»l /
(ee^le* Uk>* 03/09/M
-------
03/01/19
Draft Index Chronological Order
WIT 2)
Page: 3
laatMr: CXL-00»-1«22 To 1639
Titlei Appendix a Health «nd tni I iiinaaiTil Effect*
Type: PLM •
Author: none: none
Recipient: none: none
Pmruti OEL-002-0777
Date: / /
Ooc
t Ruabttr: CZL-003-OS10 To 0961
Inferc«Mat toeerd of Oaclaloo
Typ»i PLM
Aat&art OOIMI US IPA
Itaelpiantt OOIMI U8 IP*
of
Parent: CB-003-030*
*lt*rn«tlv» Salactloo
/ /
nt MuBtwr: OD.-003-07M to OtO]
Title: Appendix I Analytical Data
Type: PLM
Author: none: none
Recipient: none: none
Parent: CXL-OOJ-OSM
Date: / /
Dociaaat luabex: OL-001-M04 To 0917
Title: Appeadljc II Rlak Aaaeeaaent Data
Typ»i PIJUI
Autoor: none:
Recipient: none:
OoeiMBt VueMr: dL-00)-U10 To 1219
Title: Appendix A Photograph*
Typ»« PLM
Author: noaei aooe
Recipient: none: BOB*
nt •uaber: CB-003-1220 To 1333
Title: Appendix a Dally Logs
Typei PLM
Recipient: none: BAM
' ^c.
Parent: OL-003-0394
Date: / /
Parent: db-003-UM
Date: / /
Parent: OL-O03-UM
Data: / /
nt Bunberi
Title: AppeodiX C
Typei PLM
To 14M
,t*
Parent: OL-OOJ-UO*
/ /
-------
03/01/99
Draft lodax otroaologlcal ordar
(CnMBLS WIT 2) DOCOMDU
Pagas 3
Doctaoot •oafear: C*L-003-14»1 To 1440
Titl«> Appaadlx D Laboratory Analytic*! Data
Typei PLAI
Author: noaat ocna
Racipiant: aona: noea
Paraot: OEL-003-1490
Da tat / /
OocoMOt lumber: OX-003-1S41 To U40
Tltla: AppaadJx I Calculation Briafa
Typat FLAB
Author: nonai
elpiaoti aoaai
Parmntt OL-003-1490
Oatai / /
Ooctaant luabar: OX.-003-1847 To 1164
TltOaj AppaadU v vac Air Oxidation Daport
Typai FLAW
Authort noaat naoa
Meiplaoti aoaat aoea
Paraatt eat-003-1490
Oatai / /
at mater: CEL-003-li«3 To l»94 Paraoti
Tltla i Appaadlx VT MaaTlngttouaa Xaeiaaratloa Maport
003.1490
Datat / /
Author i laeDeveblfl, D Mi IflaaTI option aa
Kaclplaatt ooaat Coll « Matarlal Bnglhaan (UMI) .
at Buattvi CH-003-1914 To 1»31
Tltiai appaadlx DC Altaxnatl»» Coat Cale&latleBa
Typat FLAM
Authori aoaai
•aclpiaati aoaai
Paraoti C&-003-14M
Oatai / /
t luaAari CB-002-OJOS To 030S
Tltlat (Lattar raquaatlag part • of appliaatioa for
Typai
Coodltloni NXttXM
Aathort axrlckUMd. O Vi K
Baclplaot: Braat,
Oat«i Ol/ll/U
«aata fasility Cor
OOCIBMDt
Tltlat (
raoartlag
Authort Moaa. willlai It Pltar Iado«trlaB
Raelplaati ttrlclLlaod, O Vi K Oapt of •avaa
SO not Paraoxi cn-003-«aM
li lanar datad Ol/ll/U for Part I paxmit appllnatlfB)
I 04/19/U
-------
03/01/89 Draft Index Chronologic*! order p__, 4
(OPIRARU WIT 2)
307 ft 0307 Punt: OL-002-0284 Dates 10/U/83
Titles (Latter foxwdloa PesHt 17241* dated 10/13/83 and ahall void 17241)
Types QQXRXKPQiMCR
Author: Belaa, Robert Ps K Dept of latural Resource* 4 Canunlty Development
Recipient: Roaa,.VUlia* •: TUmt Xatfaatrle*
DaeuMDt Huab«r: (31-002-0308 To 0310 Punt: CB.-002-02M D«M: 10/12/83
Tltlat P«zmlt far tte Olsebarg* of flaiMga, IndiutxiAl Wut*«, or Otter
Type: uau. oocimurr
Author: B*!JM, Ratart P: *C 0«pt of I«tur*l RMOUZCW 4
aoaat Pltar lad
OoeuMOt luabui OL-003-0339 To 033* Pu«nt: OL-002-02M Data: 02/02/84
Titles (L«tt*r r*«ffirBla0 tto«t eeMpuy doM not eboo«« to file • Put I application)
Types CQHM8POB>0Ci1
Conditionj MMUZIULZA
Author> tellu«. M Os Caaaaee* Corporation
Recipients Strickland, 0 «s K Oect of HIOMB Reeoureei
OoetaHBt miaber: CB.-002-0373 To 0373 Pareats CZL-002-0284 Dates 04/10/84
Titles (Letter auaBuKing work completed durlnfl 03/00/87)
Types
Author i Olover, Iverett Vs aoU • Material fnjineere (84NI)
Recipient: Moore, Bens U« IPA
Oocoeent Vuaber: OL-002-0340 To 0340 Parents CBr»002-oae4 Dates M/17/84
Titles . (Letter advlaing that plant baa been danied a peralt and all the laplioetiana)
Types
Condi tlont
authors atrlcstlaad, 0 Ms K Dept of taao Reeeureea
Recipient i ROM, Wlllla* Is Plher Industrie*
t luabert OtL-O02-0311 To 0311 Pereots OL-O03-0384 Dates 03/01/85
Title* (Letter forverdiag RTDat pendt)
Types
Author: WUaa, • t«Ot K Depc of Bataral Raeourcee < Co»«uUty Dvrel
Recipient: Pullea, JaBMB> d OeXaaeee Oorporatloo
Titles Peait to DlaeeuDe
Punts O&-002-C284 Dates 01/01/83
the Rational PeUount Dlacharae nsrlaarln
Types IMOO.
Aothar: Vila*. R Pauls K Dept of lataral ReiBiircea «
Recipients nones Celaaaee Corporatioe
-------
03/01/M
looex fhronnlogical Order
(OMRABU OVZT 2)
Peoei 3
Dt mutteri dL-OOa-0337 To 0337
Titlei (Meao attaching tae final DOU permit)
Typei
Parent:
Oatei 04/11/U
Author: Pulleo, Jaeea C: Oelaneae corporation
Recipient: aone: illegible
OoeuMot luabar: OO-001-0001 To 0001
Tlti»: (trtt*r •ncloalng Draft riaal tapert for tte Bit*)
06/01/M
Autbari Clarlo, itondltb It M 0A
0*ry L< OoU « IUt«rl*l tagiatmru (SMU)
OaciaMOt Buatwr: OB-OOl-OOOJ To 0074 Pamti CB^OOl-0003
Titla: riaal teport C«I*n««« riten Op«r«tloB> aita forward Plaoolng
Oatat 07/32/U
Author i aoiMt Cop OrMMr « NB!M (OM)
Recipient i aooai U8 DA
Dt IIMDV: en-001-0003 To 0004
Titlai (Cor«r letter »ateUttino tbe Fio*i Xeport)
Oatei 07/22/W
Aathors Mobarta, JO&B Li Caep Or*eaer «
Decipieot! vrlabt, taMell ti ta DA
Attached! oa-001-0002
(ON)
< ODr-001-OS33 To 0933
attachlag leeltb ud tafecy flan iafonHtioa)
OBr-001-02fl7
Oatei 07/32/*S
TlUet
Typei
Authorj Moea, wiiliae It fiber Xateetrie*
Reelpleat: lUepeeo. Oary !•' *oU • Material tng1 neeri (
Oatei Ot/30/U
aaklaa Car DA to •be
n OO-001-4U2 To OIU
oetei M/24/M
Titlet (LKter
tte Draft
flee for tee alte)
Typei (I«H1H'«I»C1
Antheri Link, Donald Rt 1C Dept of
Reeipiemi Clarta, Naredltb it M DA
-------
03/01/69 Draft Zadax faronologleal ordar Pam. «
wnr J>
DocuMot ffoabari CaV-OOl-OlM to 0167 Panat: Ott-001-0073 Oat*i 09/36/69
Tltlat (BaadtorlctaB l*ttax *Dclaalaa • liat of qa*atlana and concern*)
Typ*:
Author: Caopar, Jay It r**ld*at
Raelpiut: Cl«r)w, MMr*dltfc Li US Bl
Biuttwr: en-001-0168 To 0169 P«r*ati aa-001-OOTS Oaui 10/02/tS
Tltlci (HMO r*vl«wine t&« Draft XI/P8 Work Plan oatad 08/20/83)
Authors Plvtroaawlec, Caalaar Vi aacaey for Toxic SubatancM • Plaaaaa taglnry (AT8CB)
RaelpiMti caarfai, MarvilUi Lt US 0A
Dociaant luabar: CB.-001-0150 To 0136 Parant: OL-001-0079 Batat 10/04/63
Tltla: (Haao autMlttlag coMaata to laeorporata la th« PlaaJ. Mark Plan)
Author i Clark*, Mradlth tt us 0A
Raclpiant: Olovar, kVaratt MI Soil C Natatrlal Bnglaaara (8AMI)
at luMbsrt OL-001-0137 To 01S7 Paraati CXL-001-007S Oatai 10/04/83
Tltlat (MBMO acoaptlng draft work plan and aaklag to r*vlaw tha project aa^illnu plan)
Aothori BoJwy, wnilaa Mi DC 0*
Haclpiaotj Clark*, NaradltA Li US DA
Dt luMbari CD.-001-0073 To 0263 Oatat 11/01/83
Tltl*i .Mark Plaa 8h»lby Facility Oalanaa* Plbara Oparatiaoa 8balfeyf K
Typai FLA!
Author: ooaai Soil 6 Material laglMtn (84JV)
Raclplwtt 000*1 aoa*
Attaehadt OL-001-0076 CB.-001-0150 CXL-001-01S7 OL-001-0163 CBr-O01-O164 dL-001-0166 CBr-OOl-0168
Cn-001-0170
at luatwri dX-001-0076 To 0077 taraett CB-001-0079 Oat*i 11/01/83
Tltlai (Moao attaeolag tto r*rl**d work plan for th* alt* and aaklag for a VHDOBM)
aatoori Olow, l«8BflCC Vt 8oll • Httartal tng1n*ar» (84M)
taclplaati Clarka, MBB8tttfe It Oi m
"«.".'
D awnt laatwri CKb-«n-03M To 0867 0*«*i U/01/89
Titlai Fact 6b
Typai FLA*
AatBori 000*1 U8 OA
Kaclplanti 000*1 BOB*
-------
03/01/S9 Draft Index Chronological Order p—., T
WIT 2) - **'
Oooaut vnaber: OO-O01-02M To 026S Datei 12/06/15
Title: (Certified letter approving Mark Plan by Soil and Material Snglneera dated 11/01/85)
Type.
Author: Oevlae, Tfco*ae Vi OS DA
Recipient: tegaljua, SIMAB Pt r«iin»«« Corporation
OocuBBDt Buatoer: CXL-001-0801 To 0804 Parent: CXL-001-0731 Oatet 12/11/15
Title: (letter ooeeeatiag on the Peealhlllty Study Mark Plan)
Author: Moor*, IflDt UB B>A
R«clpi«nt: aiov«r, tvarrct MI Soil t iut«riAl togiiwan (MNI)
Docuaent luaber: CXL-001-0269 To 0270 Date: 12/12/15
Title: (Letter •'-'-j activities at the alte during 11/00/8S)
comaramua
Autbort olovcr, tvarwtt HI Soli I Material KngiiuMr* (SAM!) ..
ClATK*, MuvdlUl ll US OA
Oocueeot •ueber: OO001-0273 To 0293 Parent! C&-001-0271 Date: 01/017M
Titlei Coemninity Melatlon* Plan for Cel anaee PUber* OparaUona Site Snaltoy, K
Autaori Utatmrtm. • MlebMlt OS 0A
taelplaatt ooa» oen*
Oocoeent Voaberi Ctt-001-0271 to 0272 Oatei 01/OS/M
Title: (Neeo forwarding final Caeeunlty talatlona Plan for the alte with llet of adtfreeeee'a aleo attached)
Typei COMII8MSD0CI
Author: Anrteraon, Meredith Clarke: OS 0A
Recipient: Croaby, Lee: K Oept of laMaa Baeourcee
Attached: CXL-001-0273
nnriieerir laatter: OB-002-0370 Co 0370 Parent i CSL-O02-42S4 Oetei 01/10/M
Title: (Latter anaearlitng work ~7T1""rf daring 12/00/S* end planned acti*ltie* for 01/00/t7)
Typei eauaaetama
Authors Barooe, Joem C« Sell S •nerl*! mglneere (UNI)
elpient:
to to* Pmrmit »K 004993)
Tltlct (Loctax fanwrdlny
Author: wiiav, * Paali SC Oapt of Utar«l
•aclpiMtt BOM, ttUlM si Piter
-------
03/01/09
Draft Xadtoc
Chronologic*! Ordwr
2)
PaMI ,
^*
at •MOWS Ot-001-0294 So 0395
Titlai (HOBO pra« anting itatua report for tho month of U/OO/U)
Author: olov«r, tvcrctt Wi Soil • NatarUl tn j1 n««ri (SMI)
Recipient: AadanoD, itorwlith CLtrk*> UB OA
OoeiOMat >uab«r: OO.-002-0342 To 0343 Putut: CXL-002-02«4
Tltl«i (l«tt*r •UMHrUing wort fmrtormmi durlag 12/00/85)
typ»: aanaavoMDnci
Author: Olovar, »v«r«tt Wi Sail « iut«rlal KcgloMr* (S4MI)
taelpluti And«r»ea, Muwdltb Clwkai US DA
DacuMot fuitwr: OL-001-0296 to 05 »3
Tltlci Fln*l Vroj«et Op«r«tlon» Plu "i1in«n
Typ»: PUUI
Author: aoa» Soil c N«uri«l Ingin««r» (
taelpiMti vami U« tPA
Ptruts dL-001-0397
OocUBBOt HuBbwri CH-001-0297 Co 0297
Tltl«i (tctur «tt*chiafl th« riaaJ Projact opuemtiaa* Plaa for tto «lt»)
Author » C*rt«r/ l«rryi Boil « tUtmrUl tnyltmmn (S«O)
taelpiaott Ano«r»on, Muvdlth ClutMt a 0A
Atueacd: CIL-001-02M dL-001-0333
01/16/M
taut 01/16/M
taut 01/21/M
tattl 01/21/M
DocuMOt luatwr: CKL-001-03M To OS«7
Tltl«: [HMO reporting on »«t1ng iMld on Ol/30/ae eonc«raiflB
tat«t 03/07/M
aad 0*1700*1 progrw for
Author: loci*. Solrloyi «oil • Mt*ri*l Baglaomr* (MW)
ABdo-rooB, Norodltfe Clutoi M 0A
OoeuMOt ItHteri O&-001-09M *o OS91
Tltlot (X«tt*r iiM
03/11/M
ax tto CPO/lhalAy IZ/M for tto aontfe af 01/00/M)
Titlat
Typoi DAB
AuUtori
taclplaati
s» osti r*rwti at-ooi-oaia
(Cor OMO tottl* proporcy)
BO«OI oa/ii/M
, P«ti 1C O«pt of
-------
03/01/19 Draft Index Chronological ordar ttgmt 9
OBIT 2) nnriiaanti
nt Boabart CBL-002-OJ44 To 0347 Paraat: OL-002-02M Oatat 02/11/M
Tltlai (Lattar ••[••riling work daring 01/00/M)
Typo i _ __
Author: Olovar, BVarctt Wi toll t Material togiaaari (UHB)
Kaeipiaat: Townaaad, Qaaa Di Ul BPA
Docuaant Buabar: CTL-001-0592 To 0392 Data: 02/17/M
Tltlai (Haao daaeribiag 9ita Viait Trip Xaport oa 02/11/M and uapllng iltaa)
AutBori OaMoaa, Fat! BC Oapt of Buaaa Baaoorcaa
Bacipiaat: filet aoaa
AttaeBads CBL-001-0393
Ooeaaaet miobari CZL-001-0394 To OS96 Oatai 03/04/M
Tltiai (L«ttar dMcrioiag work OB tte El/78 at taa aiu daring to* «wti of 02/00/M)
AutBori Olovar, tvaratt «i toil < Matarial mgiaacra (S&KI)
Racipiaatt TownMod, Oaaa Di tu 0A
Oocuaaot luabari C&-001-0397 To OS97 Datat 03/04/M
Titlas (HMO attaening aa ovarviaw of •••pllng actlvltlaa dorlag oa/OS/M aad 02/M/M)
Trpa.
Author! Vlck, toga Ci W OA
llaclpianti Clark*, Naradita Li OS BA
Attacbadi CKL-001-OS9*
Oeeuaaat Buabar t CBL-002-034* To 0330 Faracti CH-O02-O2M Oatai 03/04/M
Tltlai (Lattar praaanrlnp 02/00/M Btataa Baeort)
ii
Author: alow, BWatt Wi Boil • Natarial tnfllnaan (MM)
elpiaati TonBaaad, Oaaa Oi OB BPA
at Buabar: dt-001-0700 To 0700 Faraott CaV-OOl-MSS 0«t»i 03/03/M
Title: Mark AMlgoaaat Cowmr Bbaat
Typai omx
Author i Aadaraoa, MBBtfltB eXUkM 01 BPA
DBtti 03/10/M
of >Km Adaiaiateativa Qrdar for tM alta)
Titiai (Latur aanloaug ••
Aothori Bavaa, Jack Bi OB 0A
Baclplaati •-tT1-*-. Buaaa Pi CaOaaaaa Corporatloa
Attacaadi CBr-001-O«10
-------
03/01/19
Draft Index chroaological order
Page: 10
at Jhabers CB-O81-0610 To 0621
Titles AdHnletratl** Order on rnhaent
Type: LICA1 UXUttM
Authori Ravan, Jack li Ui DA
Recipient: none: DOB*
: dL-001-0609
Date: 03/10/M
DociOMOt luaber: CEL-002-0290 To 0301
Titlei Adiiniatrative Order oa Conaent
Type: LICAL axixurr
Author: Ravan, Jack It U3 DA
Recipienti illegible! Celeaeee Corporation
Parent: CXL-002-0264
Date i 03/10/M
Doeweot Rubier: dL-001-0622 To 0623
Title: (Meeo «i»iri«ing ooemunity relatioM eetlvitie* to date)
Date: 03/21/M
Types
Author: Andenoa, Meredith Clarke: OB DA
Recipient: Towneend, Oena Oi US DA
Dnruaent mober: OL-001-0636 To 0639
Title i Sa^le Aaeayeee Heqoeet (froe lettia property)
Type: DATA
Anthers OeKoea, tats K Oept of
Kaelplent: nones
Bates 03/26/M
nt iuaber: OL-001-0696 To 0696 Parent: OL-001-O653
Titles (Meeo oertifylng no knoM ooafllet of Interact aaeoelated with the «ork
Dates 03/26/66
Types
Authors Pierce, Jeffrey As
Recipients Curtia, Jonathan Os
Oreeeer 4 NeXee (CM)
Oreeeer i Nelee (CBN)
at
Titles (
s OL-001-063S TO 0639
article titleds 'Soil aad water
Parents C&-O01-O634
••[illnu ooepleted at
Dates 03/29/66
at
Titles (
lett
34 Co 0634
• oacv of e
Octet 03/31/66
Types ComDoraci
Authors •panaler. Carl Ms
Recipients ToMeead, Oeoa Os 06
Attached: CSL-O01-06J3
ipaper artlele dated 03/29/66)
Corporation
-------
03/01/69 Draft zndn OiraaologicaJ Ontez p.-,, u
WIT 2) OOCMMU
t lumbar: OL~003-O327 To 0327 Faruti OB>-002-0264 Oata>> 04/04/M
(L«tt*r forwarding ratalt 1375414 for diacbarg* of air contaminant* into
Autaor: wila*., X.Fault K Dope of Batural tacourcM « CeaauiLlty
Racipianti MayroM, v Ct ralanaaa CorporaUaa
DacuMOt luab«r: OL-00 1-0636 To 0637 D*t*i 04/07/M
Tltlai (Letter confirming 04/04/86 uOcpbOM eanwuUaa r«g«rdlag KZ/n fngrm •« tto «lt«)
AntAart LAOM, J At €•!«!»«•• Corporctlon
R«cipi«nt: TowB>«ad, Oan« Ot DA IPA
Vuabari CEL-001-0640 To 0643 Oatat 04/Of/M
Titl«i (NMO MM«rlsin« wort eeqUvtad during 03/00/H)
Autbort Baron* , Joan Ct Soil « tut*ri«a EtqinMn (KMI)
taclplanti ToMMad, (tan* Ot l» OA
at •uBtart CfL-OOJ-0331 To 0354 Famti OBi-002-03M MUt 04/Ot/M
Tita«s (t4Kt«tr --- r'-l-j 03/00/M atataa Xapart)
Autaori BCXBM, Joha Ct loll • Maurial Ingln««r» (SAW)
taclpi*ot> ToMMaad, OWM 01 oa 0A
s CH-002-03SS to 0356 »«n«i OL-002-O3M MUi 04/M/M
04/00/M «tttaa toporc)
Aauert Olormr, Ivwvtt Wt Ceil • Nawrial tnglnMn (MM)
elplcntt VowBa*od, dam Oi M 0A
t luabv: OL-001-O644 to 0644 Octal 04/M/M
(NMO dMirrlblng «it4t iMpwttCB oa 03/26/M)
Typ.i
Aataori ftrtrm. »«U K Oapt of
MelpiMtt fiiai K O^t 4Kt
Tltl«t («
Typ.i
CoadlUOBt MIMXM
AutAort
-------
03/01/99 Draft Index rhpni»logleal Order ttam. 12
{CHRAatl WIT J) cm.ie»nta ^
at msebari CB>-401-Ot47 to 0*47 Parent i en-001-Ot46 Octet 04/11/M
Tltlet (•evapaper article tltledi •Orlaklag Wella to ae Teated again*)
Author t CleBeer, Donna i Shelby ater
Recipient: nonx nan*
luatwr: CXL-001-0640 To MM tatti 04/14/M
Tltl«> (Letter Attaching copy of «rtlcl« dated 04/11/M)
Type I UJJUUC3POID0CX
Authari Spangler, Carl Mi Celaneae Corporation
Recipient! Tomaead, Oeaa Oi 0» aTA
Attached I CB.-001-0647
Pnrneent Kuaber: CB.-001-064* To 0649 Oatei 04/1S/M
Tit lei (Cover letter eoclMlag alte reporte ud reaulta of looraanle iinljiei of wall and aorfaee water aavpllog)
Typet
Condition « Niaaao ATTACHHDr
Author: Oeltoaa, Vatt IK Dept of Bwan Keaonrcee
Recipient i Aoaaraon, Meredith Clarkei Oi DA
nt Ituberi OO-001-0630 To 0651 Oatei 04/30/M
Tltlet (letter deeerlalng the overview alte vlait eg 03/U/M)
Typei 1\ "iM
Author i Pleroe, Jeffrey At Caep Oreeeer * MeXae (COM)
•eelpleati Townaead, Peaa Dt M aTA
nt RuBberi CtL-001-0701 To 0702 Oatei OS/M/M
Tltlet (Letter •neaii-lalag Mark rreyietert on the K/T9 doriag 04/00/M)
Type i
Anthari Olover. aVerett Wi loll • Material tng1neer» (MMB)
taelpleati Totmaend, Oeaa Oi BV aTA
Attached: CH-001-0704 dL-OOl-0707 CK-001-0709 att-001-0711 CSL-O01-O7U CK-O01-0734
it Vtuberi OL-OOl-OtU to WOO Parent OL-001-OU3 O«tei 09/07/M
Tltlei neeillil Z«vee«ie«tlm/Feaalklllt7 ttody overal0tt/«eehnleel topport Met Plae for nalenen Pl*er operatlaa site
Z
Typei PUI Sf-
Authort Pleroe, JeCftiv *» Cevy Oreeeer a Ndee (CDN)
at •aeperi CCb-OOl-OfU To M54 Bnei Ot/07/M
Tltlai (Cover letter foroardlag O*eni«ttt aid Teehaleal •oppart Hart Plem)
Typei
Aathort Pleroe, Jeffrey At Caep Oreeeer 4 Ndee (CON)
•eelpleati Taneeed, Qeea Oi M 0A
Attached! CKL-001-OfS2 CK-001-MM CB-001-0700
-------
03/01/89 Draft zadex ttronologlcal Orttar Pan- 13
OMIT 2) Oacrwoti '
at fafcer: OtL-001-070J To 070J Date; 03/U/M
Tltlei (Meae ettecalae owlrev of "tr14"? activities during 03/24/88 taroagb 03/26/M)
Type:
condition: Kxsaara JunoBon
Authori Sloan, Predi Ul ITA
Recipient> Townsead, 0«aa Oi U«
DocUMOt luater: CXL-001-0704 To 070S P«z*ati CXL-OOI-0701 Ottai M/OS/M
Tltl*t (l«tt«r •uawkrlilog wort eoaplctfld daring OS/OO/M)
Autttort 010v«r, Ivarvtt Vi tell I iut«ri«l rnglrturi (MMI)
R«elpi«att ToMUMad, OHM Ot 04 0A
OoeuMat luMwr: CB-002-03S7 To OJSt Pazaati Ol>-002-02M tat*< 06/OS/M
Tltl«i (tettmx pr*MBtlag OJ/OO/M 6tato> taport)
rypas oomapooora .. -----
Autaori CATMT, Larzyi teU « lUtwrlal mglnxra (S4MI)
Raclplant: Tovacaad, OWM Oi Ul 0A
OoeiBHDt luabar: CSL-001-07M To 0706 Dctas 07/01/M
Tltl«i (MK> dMcrlblag 06/23/!« tiuaaab 06/2S/M ovwalgbt InMpccUen «t sit*)
Typ«t
Autbori Wilson, <•»»—•'-» It Cup DIMMT < HdU* (CON)
tociplantt Pl«ro*, Jeffrey Ai CMP On>Mr c MclM (CBM)
OaeuMOt IttMMr: OO-002-03S9 To 03«0 Puvnti OB>002-03M 0>t*t 07/07/M
Title: (tetter preMoUna M/OO/M ttetne Beporc)
Typei
Autnors Crrter, 1*1x71 eoll < N«eri*l toalaeer* (MMt)
Keelpleat: ToMeead. Oeae Oi M BA
DoeuHot hubert CXL-003-OJ*» To 09M FarentJ CKL-002-«2M Oetai 07/30/M
Title i (Maeo foxwerOiag
it
Aataor: MOM, WllIleB It
Keelplenti Olom, li«mc Vi MaU • •tterlai Hialneera (MM)
at moMri III Ml nOT 10 070t PMHCI OI-001-C701 Detei M/Oe/M
•"•^
Tltlei (tetter •oaMrisiag Mrt •ei*leved darlag 07/oo/M)
Typet
Autaori Certer, larrri •ail • Hrcerlal •aglaeer* (•««)
MclpleBti TotAeead, Oeae Oi a BA
-------
03/01/19 Draft Tnrtai chronological Qrdar , Pagai 14
WIT 2) Oocuaaata
at Vuabari OBr-003-03*l CD 0362 Pacaati CXL-002-02M Datas M/OI/M
Titla: (Lattar inaMMiIng nock eoaiplvtad during 07/00/M)
Typai
Author! Cartar, Larryi aeil « Malarial taginaara (MM!)
Baclpiant: Tovnaand, Oaaa Dt Ul OA
«UBbar> OL-001-0709 To 0710 P&raot: OL-001-0701 taut 09/10/M
Titl«i (L«tt*r •n»iri«iag wort c«plat«d during Ot/OO/M)
Typai ^
Author > Olov«r, IvuBtt Wj aoU C lUtmrUl tnginxr* (SMI)
taeipiaati TMmMad, O«M Oi t» 0A
OoeuMot lluaMr: OL-002-0363 To 03*4 remit i on^OOa-03M Mtai 09/10/M
Tltl«: (L«tt«r •iMMrising work ct»pl«t«d during Ot/OO/M)
Autnert Olov«r, tv«r«tt «i aeil t tutorial
Meipiaati TownMOd, O*M Oi US DA
DeeOHBt luabv: CH-001-0711 To 0711 tanoti dL-00 1-0701 OatMl 10/10/M
Iltl»j (intMt muiMrixiag wort ee*pl«t«d during 09/00/M)
Authort Olovw, IvvMt «> SeU * Notarial tagiaaan (MNI)
eipiant: TomMnd, Oaaa Dt ua DA
Dnriiaant luabar: OL-002-038S CD 036S taneti OtL-002-02M Oatai 10/10/M
Titlat (Lattar •uMarlsiag wort eo^laxad during 09/00/M)
Typai
Author« Olovar, tw«r*tt Wi toll • Natarlal bgiaaars (MM)
Raelpianti TowMand, Oaaa Oi Of DA
OocuMOt luabar: cn-001-07U To 07 U Oatai 10/14/M
Titlai (namo confirming a ooavaraatlan raoinUng taa rataittal of tta raaaiaUlty
Typai
ABtnori Locia, •aixlayt •oil • Hnadal Inglnaan (MM)
•acipiaati TOMnaaad, taaa Ol OB Dl>
t Vo^art fiT «M OTU «D 0730 Batai 10/23/M
Titlai (Maw attaebiaa BBfloB IT ana a* a»llt aaapla*)
000K00BDBVCI
Aataort aaopoar, Caarliai M
Xacipianti Teimaaad, Oaaa Di M DA
-------
03/01/»9
Draft ladex Chronological order
(CFBMUI rair 2j
Pao«: 13
I CKb-003-1454 To 1495
Parent» CKb-002-0777
Oatct 10/23/M
Title t (Letter •tatlac t«*t *U laboratory aaalyM conducted by Oavia < Floyd, Zee and Trlaaale Lab i» camlet* with
U«t of defieleMElei la analytical reaulta) ^^
Aauori MeCord. Jala It Oavla < rioyd
Lucia, atUrlcyi floli « Material logioaar* (04NIJ
OoeuiMt luabv: CZL-001-0731 To 0731 Oatai 10/31/M
T1U«> (Letter •oelOMlag varioua alu rvporu and r««ult» of laorgaole tni1]-»«« ot «*U aad •orfaoa water
Typ*i
CooditlOOl KZASOIO ARUSMOfr
Autfior: Moor*, Baat ua 0A
taclplwit: Pmrry, Oougi Cl*v*laad, >C, County of
Docnaat Buaewr: CH-002-03M To 0367 Panatt
Tltlct (L«tt*r ------ ••-'-n wort e«Mpl«t«d durlag 10/00/M)
002-02M
Typ»i
AitUori Oiovar, lv«r«tt Wi Soil < Matarlal BnglnMr* IS4MI)
I*elpl«nt] Neora, Mai ua 0*
titlai
OL-002-1432 TO 1492 »ar«Ot« <3L-003-C7T7
final data on projact H173-«S-109fl»)
aomanonci
Condition i NXsaao
antAari NeCard, Joba a> Oavla • Floyd
Lucia, ablrl«r» aoll i Material
Mt*< 11/10/M
0*Ui 11/10/M
OeciBHBC >UMB«ri dL-002-1493 TO 149) »ar«Btl OL-002-0777
TlUct (L«tt«r llotlna eerrvctloM/addlUeaa for latter dated 10/23/M)
Autoori NeOord, Jota li Oavl* • Floyd
Recipient Locla, »blrl«yi aoll • Material Inglneera (teMl)
Oatei 11/10/M
at lu«B*r:
Tltlet (Letter at
001-0732 to 0733
Typei
Autbori
Recipient!
•i aeU «
Fareoti CIL-001-C701
dorlog ll/OO/M)
lei
Datei U/Ot/M
Titlei (Letter «
darlna ll/OO/M)
Aatbari Olow«r, tverwtt Vi
elpleati Moor*, fteoi oa OA
i U/Ot/l
-------
03/01/M
Draft index Cb
Logic
(craABu unr
at laber: O&-O01-OB03 To M05 Parent: CXL-001-0791
TitOei (Letter with oaMeat to add to liat Mlled ao 12/11/B6)
Type I COBMSMeDBCB
Author: Hoar*, Boat U8 BM
Recipient: Glow, Bverett Wt Boll t Material Engineers (B4MB)
P«r«ot:
durlna 12/00/M)
Oociaent luabar: CZL-001-0734 To 0734
TitOai (L«tt*r •amuulilag wort
Typ*l OOKRISPQIDBa
Author i Baron*, Jobs C: Sola 4 Mitarlal laglMan (StNi)
Meiplwit: Moor*, &•» t» DA
001-0701
Dttat U/lfl/M
taut 01/10/87
OocuMOt lUBtwr: Ott-001-0735 To 073S
Titles (LMt«r •uaurising work
tatai 03/09/S7
darlnfl 01/00/17)
Aatbart alow, Iveratt W< son 4 lUterUl
taeipleoti Nooro, Baai IM 0A
Attached! CKb-001-074« CB,-001^7SO C*L-001-0»11
DoctBMBt Rtuberi OL-002-0371 TO 0371
Title: (Letter •oaeariiing nark coBpleted daring 01/00/17)
CB>-002-02M
Oatet 03/M/rr
Typet
AutBor: Olover, Bverwtt Ws toil • tutorial tegineeri (
Recipient: Moore, Beo: t» OA
Docueent Bueber: CXL-001-0736 To 073* Oetei 02/12/B7
Title: (Letter encloelng etatua reporta froe 10/00/M to 02/00/B7 aad reeaiJbillty Beady Mock Man)
Condition: KIBBZM
Aathori Moore, Ben: OB B
Recipient: Terenrter. Jackie:
Corporation
at •aaberi CBl-OOl-0737 To 07)7
Tltlei (Letter anrlnalap
Typei
Condition: IOMXM
Aattori Moore,
Baeipieati terry.
fe*aihility Btady
of
oetei oa/u/rr
tlae ear repaaltarr)
Ooeaeeot •aeberi CBL-OOl-OTSB flo 07M
Tltlei (Letter etating that there axe ea
Author: •vallow, Joae AJ BC Oept of •
Baeipieati Moore, Beai OB 0A
nu on the neealbUity
Oetei 03/1B/B7
Flaa at tkla tiee)
-------
03/01/M
Draft Index aroaolagleal Order
(OPfBABTil OUT 2) OoeiMBta
Page: 17
at
Title: (
,-073t *0 0740 Oatei 02/23/17
eaeata on the draft U and Analytical Data Beporta dated 19M)
Tyfmt
Antnor: PletreeoMlc*, Caalaar Vi Agency for Toxic auBatanoea * Olaaaaa Reglatry (AMDJt)
Baclpiaati Moon, Bant 0* DA
Dociaent luaber: OC.-001-0741 To 0747
Title: (Letter providing coeeecta on toe Draft U)
Data! OJ/28/17
Typat Q
Author: Noara. Mai Ul DA
Recipient: dlover, tverett H: Soil • Material Biglneara (
at luaber: CXL-OOi-074* To 074* rareati OL-001-073S
Title: (letter •ueBarlxlcg vork eoepleted during 02/00/17)
Type:
Autaor: Uover, BVerett Wi toil • Material Engineer* (MM!)
Heeipieot: Moore, >eoi tu DA
Data: 03/oe/t7
at fuabari CZL-002-0172 To 0372 Pareat: OD>-002>03M
Titlei (tatter •ueBarislag work caqdatad during 02/00/17)
Type: OOmBfOMDaor
Aatnar: fllover, aVerett V: toil • Material tnglneera (MM!)
Xeeipient: Moore, aao: n DA
Date: 03/04/C7
CBr-001-074i TO 074fl
Titlei (Letter eKplaiaiag •nperfnnd
DA to dieenae iapeet of eAMA
ate and
aite)
Harnithnrltitinn Act of 1M4 -
Autbor: Tobla. Fatriek Ji 0* DA
Recipient: Pullea, Jaaea Ci Celanaea Corporation
Date: U/M/«7
vltft
at luaberi OO-001-07SO to 0750
Title: (Letter mam
type:
Aatnari alow,
eipieat:
wi toil •
Parent: OL-001-O733
«/r« dnriag 03/00/S7)
(MMB)
Date: 04/10/r?
at taeber:
Title: (Letter
•e 0719
Z
Type:
AatBor:
Recipient i
At
, Jooa Ci toll •
, Ben: 0» DA
: OL-001-07S3 CB-O01-0401
ZZ of draft U «itfe
1-0*09
Oetei 04/14/CT
-------
03/01/99 Draft Zadax Ouonologtecl Ordw p-g-, 1(
(OP0ABLB UIJ.I 3) DoetBMnta
OoeoMot labors aOi-O01-0753 to QMS Parents CIL-001-07S1 Datai OS/Ol/t?
Tltlas Final r»a«1M11ty ftody Nark Plan ml maia ribon Opcratlonc Sholfey, K
Typ»t
Authors oiovar, twwtt Wi Ooll i tuurlAl •pjiit-rf (SCMI)
RaclplMt: OOZMI D> OA
Paciaant nutt«r: O1-002-0374 To 0374 Pwoti CXL-002-0214 Oatti OS/10/»7
Tltl«J (L«tt«r •uMHTixlng wort eoBpIvtad during 04/00/97)
eonciapoiD0ci
Author: Clovar, lv«rvtt Mi oeil • lUtarUI IngiaMrs (UNI)
teelpiaat: Moor*, laoi US BA
DoeoMOt Vuabwr: Ot-001-Mll To Mil Panott: C«L-001-073S o*ui 05/11/97
Tltlat (L«ttar ———•-•• -g vort ca*pl«t«d daring 04/00/«7)
Typvs
AutBor: «BI U« 0A
Oocianot VuBbari OOr-001-MU To 0*U Datoi 09/14/»7
Tltloi (Ii«ttadr eoneomiag the aaaTlng to dlaenaa raapnnaaa to COMBOU for tho n ropatt and •ahmlttal of Final
zvport)
Autbort Lucia, «hlrl«yi Coil • Material laglnaan (
MclpiantJ Noon, Boat M DA
t luabori Ott-003-0001 To 0293 Oatoi Of/01/97
aaa Haaaillt.1 XtnroaUgatieB Baport volaaa I - tmtt, Tabla* aad Fig
Typai PLA*
Condition i MMXBU.XA
AutBor: Barona, Joan C< Sola • Material laglnaon (
Kaclplantj nea*i M 0A
nt laabor: OO-002-02M CD OTT« Oatot M/01/19
Tltl»i Flaaa •••1H1 lorHtlgatlo* taport, tppanrltw VoloM I, ipaaiiiHi A tkrag* 0
•i
Condltloei •nmar^T-Tr .
Author i Baroo*, JaMticO SoU • lartodal Baglaawa (MM)
Macipioot!
Attaebadl
' 2-0332
ea>ooa-«Mt nr nni mil 01-002-034* OL-OOI-OUI cn-ooa-oiu ov-ooa-oas? eBL-ooa-oj»
oi-ooa-«34n. ov-oa-oiu 00-002-03*3 cn^ooa-«34* e&-«ea-«3M ot-«oj-037o oa-ooa-«37i
00-002-0379 db-Ma-037) OB^-002-0374 O&-OOa-0375
-------
03/01/19
Draft Xadax Chronological Otter
icnuui unr 2)
i*
at ftatttri CBi-003-0973 to 0376 Faraoti CCL-002-02M
Tltlai (Lvttar «n»ir1flng work eoBpiaxad during 05/00/17)
Datas
Typai
Authori Olovar, Ivaratt Wi soil < Malarial faginaan (MM)
Raciplaat: Olana, Mleballai US DA
Dociaaet luabari CXL-002-0777 To 1099 D»t»i 06/22/t7
TlU«t Flaal MMMdial lovwUgatieo taport Appaadix Volia* XX »rr-r"1r P ttrough •
Typ«l FLU
CoodlUoni NkMXULXA
Author: taroo*, Joba Ci Soil « MaurlAl Iagln««r» (StM)
B«cipi«nti aoMt ua DA
Atuchad: OL-002-1100 CH-O02-14S1 OL-002-14S2 CB.-O03-1433 OBr-002-1454 OL-O02-143* OL-002-16U
nt luatar: CB-003-0001 To 0001
Titlai (NMD Maouaclag public aMtlug for 07/21/17)
Bant M/23/OT
Typ«i
Authorj Moors, Bans 01 0*
Mclplutt Thrapaon, Bagaoi IB DA
nt Kuban OL-003-0003 To 0111
TitO«i Tia*l Mvporc - Txsocerlpt of tte rublle Mating
Typ«i FLAB
Authort layld, >h«roB Li
elplonti OOMI (M DA
tcraott aL-003-0003
FUwn
taut 07/21/V7
•it* ••ilial laraitlgatlao
Dt la^MTt CBb-OOl-OaOt To M10
Tltloi (L«tt«r •plaining an •rror oad* on original re
it 0«/27/t7
0»-017J
Author« NeOord, Jote It 0«nri* • Flojd
elploati Olovar, Krvratt Wt Soli • Notarial
Ooe
it lUMbars OL-003-0003 To 0002
(lattar foxiMrdUg
•Ipt of tft*
(OM)
i u/u/rr
•ita.
Tltlai Fact iba«t - OO
it l» DA
lit* 7«a«lbUitT Kady
Author i
taelplaoti
DMMt 0&/01/M
-------
01/01/M Draft ladax Chronological Qrdar tMI J0
(craABu tnrrr 2) -
•atari Ctt-OflJ-0117 to OS07 Oatai 02/24/M
Titlas Flan Paaalfeillty Stady »aport Oparabla Unit X - QreonaMtar Public BMltfc fliiMiaan for ralinaai riban
Oparatiana
Typai PLA*
Antaori Bardia, Hicnaal Oi Boil • NatarUl •ogiaMra (SMI)
MelplMt: ooaa: UB IPA
IUBJMT: OL-003-05M to 0509 tatai 03/23/
Title< 0»cl4r«tlon Cor tto Infarr ••nt >«oort of Oseislan
Typ«i uau. uxuxurr
Aatbori taBihu, LM At Ot IPA
Meipiaats oeaai oena
Attacnadi C3EL-003-OS10
DoctBMnt labar: dL-003-OSU To 0593 Paraoti Ob-003-OSU Dat«i 07/30/M
Titlai Haalth liianaatir for ralinaaa Flban Oparatlaa 0L Sit*
typai PUUI
Aataari Cartar, ChabryU Ji 0« Oapt of laalta « Inu •arrioaa
Dt Voabari CXL-O03-03S2 to 03*2 Datai 07/27/M
TltOai (Latter forwardiaa laalth Aaaaaaaaat far »it»)
Aataori Piatzeaawies, Caaiavr V> Agaoey for Toxic •obataaeaa • Diaaaaa Bagiaxxy (J
Hacipiaati Oraaa, lUehard B> US IPA
Attaebadt OL-003>OSt3
at BUbari OL-003-1MS To 1»01 Paraoti aa-003-14M Datai 10/U/M
Titiai Appaodiz VXI Univaraity of Cantral Plorida lociaaratloo Baport
Tjrpat PUI
Aataers Clanaan. Chriatiaat Oaivwraity of Cantral Plarioa
Raeipiaots aaaat Soil • Matarlal Baoiaaan (S&W)
Ooeiaant tabari Ol^OOl-UOa CD UU Paranti CBr-O03-14W Oatai U/ll/M
Tltlat Appaodlx TXZZ Tzaatakility
it
Aataort
eipianti
IM to UOT Ona« 01/01/M
Titiai Plaal PaaaibUity ttady •apert - Opaxmfcla Obit 2 - Somroa
Cacoliaa - Volo«a li 9mK, Apaaa4ioaa Z Tkroaafe ZZX
Typai PbW
Aataori Mr*, mcnaal KI soil • Hatarial
•aeiplaoti oooai OS BA
Attaebadi CB>-003-07M CK.-O03-OM4 OL-003-Otlt
-------
OJ/01/M
Drift Zodax Chronological Otter
(cnuui unr 2) OOCOMBU
Pagoi 21
la To 1107
Paraoti CXL-003-0994
Oatat 01/01/M
Titloi Appoadlx IIIi Plaal ••p-'"^ eharactariutlon study - Qlyool Baaovory Oolt aiadg* aod lorn Pit Ana - *o*ca*x
raiinaaa facility, abolby, lorta Carolina
Typoi PLAI '
Author i noaoi
at Vuotoort
Titloi Plaal
003-llOa To 14M
tapert » Op«r«bl« Unit 3 - •oorc* N»t«ri«l -
- ValuM 2: Appudlew, AppwxUcw IV, A TtrouflU C
typ*t nu
Aatbari H*y», Nletaa*! Kt Bon < lutwlal tngtiM«r» (MMI)
taciplaat: aoa«i ua 0A
dL-003-llOfl OL-003-1210 CH-OOJ-U20 Ot-003-133*
0«Ul 01/01/M
C«itn«M facility, Stelby, •orth
t luatoor: CH-003-11W To 120t
Titloi Appendix XV final Broataallity ataoy - llologlcal
facility, Baolfcy, •orth Carolina
CXb-003-llM
Qt of tha
Oat«t 01/01/M
OBlt aMadg* -
typai PUUT
Authori aoavi
elplaati ooaai
I CZL-001-1490 CO H31
Tltlai flaal foaalMlity atady Boport - Opoxsbl* Halt 2 -
Carolina - Volwo 3i Appoadieo*, Apponrtlro* IV, 0 aad I, V
Typoi mm
Anthori Hoy*, Nienaol Hi Boil • Notarial tnglnoon (BoNI)
BoelploBti aoooi UB 0A
Attach*)> C&-003-14tl CK-003-1B41 CXL-003-ia47 CK-003-lBaS CBL-O03-ia«
it 01/01/M
radllty,
, Morth
at Katmri CXt-O03-l*32 to 1*34
Tltlai
-------
03/01/99
Draft
Quoaolagical Qrdar
(orouui urn 2}
Pagat 23
ot matter: OL-003-1933 To 1939
Titlai (Lattar mbalttiafl ooBBaota OB tba Paaaibillty atody Baport)
tatat 03/07/W
Typa:
Author i luyroaa, «• Ci Calanaaa Oozporrcioo
taclpluti Olacn, NietaUat OS DA
AttwlMdi Ott-003-1937
Daetaut Dutwr: OL-003-1939 So 1939 tatai 02/Oi/M
(Lflttar craiwaittiag tto Opuabl* Unit me r*Mlbility atady «ad riepeMd tlma F«et •h«*t)
Aatnori HaUatup, rrueMi Ca^ Dra«Mr i Mela* (OH)
taelpiaatx Bacvall, Doaai U DA
Attaebadi 0X^003-1940
nni iiaaiir Buabar: Ctt-003-1940 to 1946
P*r«Bt: CKL-003-1939
Titlai oparabla Unit XMo FaMibUlty Ctady and rxopoaad Plan Pact thaat -
cooncy, lortB Caroltru
Datai 02/Ot/M
Piban Opazatioaa Uta - Clcmlaad
Typa: PUB
Aataor: Uoyd, •haxoa It
Baolplanci nonai m~*^
Ian t HaUfnn
at luabari Clt-OOJ-1947 To 1949
Titlai (Lattar aapporUag loacaat Calaaaaa'a
Oatai 03/04/99
approach to Opnrahla Oftit (MB)
Typa:
Author: CaJdxaU, Don It ralinaaa CorporatioB
taelpiantt Uana, Nieballa: U> DA
Attacaaai C&-003-1949
at luabvi CB-003-19S4 To 1994
Titlai (Lattar rajaetlag loaenat Oalaaaaa'a prafaraaea (or o<(-alta
Oatai ea/09/M
•tlaa)
Typai
Aathort Olana, NiebaUai m DA
Xaclplant: Nayroaa, V Ct Palinaaa Ootporatian
Titlai (H
I OL-003>19S9 To
Oatai oa/09/S*
ta ba bald OB Pabnary 1C, UM)
Typai am,
Antbar: aoaai
taeipiaati oooat
Typai
Autbori
Racipiaati
Datai 03/09/99
CIQB taa aaaOby fltv)
ii Ui DA
-------
OJ/01/M draft zadax Ottoaalogieal Ordar p«o«i 23
(orauui OUT 2)
OoeojMBt tabari C&-003-1S37 To l»37 Oatai 03/10/t9
Titlai (baapla of lattar aaat to aadla traaaaittiag a public aaatiag iimrmnraaanr aad Fact abaat)
Aatbori Uaytf, Muuaa li Boo* Allan < •— "*~-
ei atoUy «t«r
OB,-003-19S» OL-003-1MO
at Vnabari OX-003-193* To 1999 taraoti Ott-003-1957 Oatai 02/10/M
Titlai (Liat of aadla rapraaantativaa racalrlag eopiaa of tba poblle aaaTlnp aBaoaaaajacrt aad tba Fact Ibaat)
Typai
Author: aoaai U8 0A
aaelplaati aoaai BOB*
Docoaaot iruaovi OL-003-1960 to 19M raraoti O&-003-1957 oatai 09/10/M
Tltlai (lininin aaanr for taa public aaaripg to ba bald Pabnaxy It, 1M9)
Aatbori Donei M 0*
Haclplaoti aoaai aaaa
Rt iDatwrt OO-003-19«i To 19«1 Oatai 03/11/
Titlai *0a to Mdraaa Claaasp of Baaardoaa Vaata lita* (arclela tooa Ska aaalby Mar
aatbori Claaaaz, Oeoaat Cbalby atar
elplaati ooaai
------- |