PB97-963130
                                 EPA/541/R-97/094
                                 January 1998
EPA   Superfimd
       Explanation of Significant Difference
       for the Record of Decision:
       Bendix Flight Systems Division
       South Montrose, PA
       11/22/1996

-------
           EXPLANATION OF SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES
            BENDIX FLIGHT SYSTEMS DIVISION SUPERFUND SITE
        SOUTH MONTROSE, SUSQUEHANNA COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
A.    Introduction

   The Environmental Protection Agency, Region III (EPA) is issuing this Explanation of
Significant Differences (ESD),  pursuant to  its authority in  Section  117(c) of the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as
amended  (CERCLA),  42 U.S.C. § 9617(c), and the National Oil and  Hazardous
Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP), at 40 C.F.R. § 300.435(c)(2)(i), for the
September 30,1988, Record of Decision (ROD) (no. 197, Section III, in the Administrative
Record Index for the Site) issued for the Bendix Flight Systems Division Superfund Site
(Site)  in South Montrose, Pennsylvania.  EPA is the lead agency for the  Site and the
Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) is the support agency.
EPA has identified an  aspect of the Site remedy that is appropriate to change through
this ESD. EPA has determined that this change does not fundamentally alter the remedy
selected in the ROD with respect to scope, performance, or cost.  This ESD will become
part of the administrative record file located  in EPA Region III and the offices of the
Susquehanna Planning Commission at the addresses listed below in Section F.
B.    Summary of Site History. Contamination Problems, and Selected Remedy
    The Bendix Superfund Site is an active aircraft instrument manufacturing plant.  From
 1952 to 1978, solvents used in degreasing operations were disposed into the onsite
 wastewater treatment system, into a series of earthen trenches and onto  the ground
 surrounding the  plant. The disposal practices resulted in contamination of the soil and
 groundwater,  with  chemicals  including trichloroethylene  ("TCE"),  perchloroethylene
 ("PCE"), 1,1,1-trichloroethylene ("TCA"), vinyl chloride, benzene, and xylene (hereinafter
 collectively referred to as "VOCs").  The contaminants are  "hazardous substances" as
 defined in Section 101(14) of CERCLA.

 For a more detailed summary of site history, and contamination problems, see Sections
 III (page 1) and V (page 2) of the ROD.  For a description of the remedy as set forth in
 the ROD, see Section XII (page 24).
 C.    Significant Differences: Rationale

      Selected Remedy for the Contaminated Soil Areas.

      There are two majors areas of VOC contaminated soils at the Site; the area to the
 east of the Bendix plant, and the area to the west of the plant. The selected remedial

-------
alternative for the soils on the east side of the plant was excavation and mechanical
aeration, and for the soils on the west side of the plant the selected remedy was vacuum
extraction.  One of the main reasons vacuum extraction was selected for the west side
of the plant was because there were numerous buried utilities in this area making soils
excavation  and  aeration  (as  selected for  the  east side)  both  hazardous and
environmentally inefficient.  In 1991 a vacuum extraction and soil dewatering pilot study
was performed to assess the effectiveness of this technology and to gather information
for designing the site remedies.  This study and other remedial work at the Site found
vacuum extraction to be technically and physically impractical due to the nature of the
soils in this area (glacial till).  Furthermore, the impediments to excavation  and soil
aeration, i.e. the buried utility lines, were removed by relocating them overhead.

Therefore, the reponsible party requested that the remedy be changed to provide for soil
excavation and aeration on the west side of the plant instead of vacuum extraction. EPA
has decided that it is appropriate to make this change.  This BSD modifies the Record
of Decision; however, the attainment levels and levels of protection remain unchanged.

In summary, this ESD allows for the same remedial action (i.e mechanical soils aeration)
to occur for soils on the west side of the plant as was specified in the Record of Decision
for  the east side  of the plant.

D.    Affirmation of Statutory Determinations

    Considering the new information tr  : has been developed and the changes that have
been made to the selected remedy, EPA believes that the remedy, as modified by this
ESD, remains protective of human health and the environment, complies with Federal
and State requirements that are applicable or relevant and appropriate to this  remedial
action, and is cost-effective. In addition, the revised remedy utilizes permanent solutions
and alternative treatment technologies to the maximum  extent practicable for this Site.

E.     Support Agency Comments

       The above changes to the remedy have been coordinated with representatives of
PADEP pursuant to  40  C.F.R.  §  300.435(c)(2)(i).   PADEP verbally concurred  on
November 13, 1995 with changes to the selected remedy as described in this ESD.

F.     Public Participation Activities

    As required by 40 C.F.R.§ 300.435(c)(2)(i), notice of this ESD will be published in the
local newspaper. This ESD is part of the administrative record file and is available for
review at the two locations identified below:
                                                              AR30168I

-------
E.   Support Agency Comments

     The above changes to the remedy have been coordinated with
representatives of PADEP pursuant to 40  C.F.R. S300.435(c)(2)(i).
PADEP verbally concurred on November 13, 1995 with changes to the
selected remedy as described in this ESD.


F.   Public Participation Activities

     As required by 40 C.F.R.S 300.435(c)(2)(i), notice of this
ESD will be published in the local newspaper.  This ESD is part
of the administrative record file and is available for review at
the two locations identified below:

          United States Environmental Protection Agency
                           Region  III
                     841 Chestnut Building
                Philadelphia,  Pennsylvania 19107
                         (215)  597-3037
                 Hours: 8:30 a.m.  to 5:00 p.m.
                     Monday through Friday


              Susquehanna County Planning Commission
                        31  Public  Avenue
                       Montrose, PA  18801
                         (717)  278-4600
                 Hours: 8:00 a.m.  to 5:00 p.m.
                     Monday through Friday
'i
                                    .e&t-^.
ate                        Thomas C. Vol/tagcpip,  Djj?e'ctor
                           Hazardous WasxaJlM:ngg^ment Division
                                                 AR3GI682

-------