PB94-963918
EPA/ROD/R03-94/181
September 1994
EPA Superfund
Record of Decision:
Austin Avenue Radiation Site, PA,
6/27/1994
-------
;
. ' .. i
..
RECORD OF DECISION
AUSTIN AVENUE RADIATION SITE
DECL&QTION
SITS HAMB AND LOCATION
Austin Avenue Radiation Site
Delaware County, penns~lvania
STATBHBHT OF BASIS AND PURPOSE
This Record of Decision (ROD) presents the selected remedial
actions for twenty-two (22) properties included in the Austin
Avenue Radiation Site, Delaware County, Pennsylvania (Site). The
remedial actions were developed in accordance with the. statutory
requirements of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensa-
tion, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. ~~
9601 et. sea.. and are consistent with the National Oil and Hazard-
ous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP), 40 C.F.R. Part
300. These remedy selection decisions are based on an Administra-
tive Record compiled for this site (~ index to this Administrative
Record is attached). The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania concurs with
these remedial actions. A copy of the concurrence letter is
attached. . .
ASSESSMEHT OP THE SITE
Actual or threatened releases of hazardous substances from
properties covered by this ROD,. if not addressed by implementing
the response actions selected in this ROD, may present an imminent
and substantial endangerment to public health, welfare, or the
environment.
DESCRIPl':ION OP HE.SELECTED REMEDY
The selected remedial actions identified in this ROD will
mitigate and/or pr~vent human exposure to radiation-contaminated
buildings and soil.. These actions will affect twenty-two (22)
properties, twenty-one of which are contaminated with radioactive
hazardous substances. :
~
The selected remedial actions include the fOllowing maj or
components: .
1.
The removal of contaminated components from the
residential structure located at 346 OWen Avenue and the
repair of the structure.
The removal of contaminated structural components where
practicable, or the complete dismantlement of residential
structures on eighteen other properties followed by
either repair of the structures, replacement of the
2.
"
-------
3.
...
2
structures on those properties, or relocation of the
residents to an offsite location. The property owners
will select repair (where practicable), structure
replacement, or offsi te relocation after this ROD is
issued. The United states will acquire tit~e to each
property:where offsite relocation has been selected by
the residents. At the end of the remedial action, title
to each such property will be transferred to the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
The dismantlement of an addition at the rear of 42 South
Union Avenue and the repair of that building and the
adjacent structure at 44 ~outh Union Avenue, as neces-
sa;y.
Temporary relocatlon of property residents during
contamination removal and structural restoration or
replacement. Building tenants will be relocated.
5. . Removal and offsite disposal of radiation-contaminated
soils at:permitted facilities.
;
4.
6.
7.
8.
9. .
10.
Offsite disposal of radioactive and demolition wastes at
permitted facilities.
Backfilling and revegetation of remediated properties.
Replacement of the storage building that at one time was
135 Austin Avenue.
,f
provision of an offsite structure or equivalent to
replace the building formerly located at 133 Austin
Avenue.
.
Provision of institutional controls in those instances
where soils cannot be removed to a level where the
property is available for unrestricted use and unlimited
access.
STATUTORY DBTBRMINATIONS
The selected remedies are protective of human health and the
environment, comply with Federal and state requirements that are
legally applicable or rel~vant and appropriate to the remedial
actions, and are cost-effective. These remedies utilize permanent
solutions and alternative treatment technologies to the maximum
extent practicable~ However, because treatment of the principal
threats at these properties was not found to be practicable, these
remedies do not satisfy the statutory preference for treatment as .
a principal element.
-------
'.t
!
3
For each property where hazardous substances remain onsite
above health-based levels, the five-year review required by Section
121(0) of CERCLA, 42U.S.C. S 121(0), will apply.
l4V
, Region III
ro-b7-~'f
Date
~rhr
Peter H. Kostmayer
Regional Administra
-------
RIDf1P\ZAL AL'1'BIUIA'1'IVB BCORD 01' DBC1:81:0Jl 8UIDIARY
- AU8'1'1:1t AVJD1UB RADJ:A'1'1:0Jl 81:'1'B
1.
81:'1'8 LOCA'1'1:01t AJID DB8CR1:P'1'1:0Jl
The Austin Avenue Radiation site ("Site") is located on and
near approximately forty parcels in Lansdowne Borough, AIdan
Borough, East Lansdowne Borough, Darby Borough and Upper Darby
Township, Delaware County , Pennsylvania. These parcels, all wi thin
a two-mile radius of the former W.L. CUmmings radium refining
operation ("CUmmings") which was located at the intersection of
South Union Avenue and Austin Avenue in Lansdowne (see Figure 1),
have been contaminated with radium and thorium-contaminated waste
tailings fro~ the defunct refining operation which were used in
building construction and renovation during the early 1900s.
Twenty-two (22) of the parcels that have been placed on the
National Priorities List (NPL) promulgated pursuant to the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, compensation, and Liability
Act of 1980, as amended (CERCLA), and the National Oil and
Hazardous Substances Pollution Contigency Plan, 40 C.F.R. Part 300,
are subject to this Record of Decision. The remaining parcels are
or will be addressed exclusively by removal actions performed
pursuant to section 104 of CERCLA~ 42 U.S.C. S 9604.
The parcels included within the Austin Avenue Radiation site
which are subject to this Record of Decision are as follows:
Lansdowne Borouah
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
216 Wayne Avenue
218 Wayne Avenue
219 Wayne Avenue
237 North Lansdowne Avenue
6 East Plumstead Avenue
10 East Plumstead Avenue
16 East Plumstead Avenue
42 South Union Avenue
133 Austin Avenue
(10) site of the former radium refi~ing
facility at S. Union Ave. and Austin Avenue
UDDer Darbv '1'ownshiD
(11) 500 Harper Avenue
(12) 346 Owen Avenue
(13) 310 Shadeland Avenue
(14) 3723 Huey Avenue
~ldan Borouqh
(15) 64 South Clifton Avenue
-------
2
Bast Lansdowne Borouah
(16) 34 Lewis Avenue
(17) 211 Penn Boulevard
(18) 151 Lexington Avenue
Darbv Borouah
(19) 617
(20) 619
(21) 621
(22) 623
Pine
Pine
Pine
Pine
street
street
street
street
2.
8:J:TB H:J:8TORY
i ;
The history of the Austin Avenue Radiation site is intertwined
with that of a former Superfund site, the Lansdowne Radiation Site,
. which was a twin house located at 105-107 East Stratford Avenue in
Lansdowne, Pennsylvania. . A now deceased professor, Dr. Dicran
Hadjy Kabakjian, owned the house at 105 East Stratford Avenue, and
also worked for cummings while the company conducted its radium
refining operation at the warehouse.
While a professor at the University of Pennsylvania, Dr.
Kabakjian developed a crystallization process for the refining of
radium, and then sold the process to cummings. He worked as a
consultant to cummings until 1924, when he set up his own radium
processing business in the basement of his home at 105 East
Stratford Avenue. The maj or product of his home business was
radium-filled implant needles which were sold to medical
professionals for the treatment of cancer.
The radium refining process developed by Dr. Kabakjian and
practiced at cummings' warehouse used a yellowish, shale-like
material known as carnotite ore. This ore was mined from deposits
in Utah and Colorado. One ton of carnotite ore could produce
approximately one-tenth of a grain of radium. During cummings'
years of operation at the Union Avenue war~ouse, its radium output
is estimated to have been three grams per year. The radium
extraction process generated waste tailings. These tailings
contained two residual radionuclides, radium 226 and thorium 230.
The tailings, which were sand-like waste materials, were either
given or sold to local building contractors and others. During the
seven years that cummings operated at the warehouse, those persons
used the tailings in mortar, stucco, plaster, and concrete which
were used to build or renovate houses in the area. The ore
processing also produced waste liquids containing uranium 238. .
These/liquids were apparently dumped into cesspool systems in the
immediate vicinity of the cummings facility.
-------
3
In 1963, the Pennsylvania Department of Health inspected the
105 East Stratford Avenue house and found extremely high levels of
radiation. In 1964, the U.S. Public Health Service and the
Pennsylvania Department of Health, aided by the u.S. Air Force,
attempted to decontaminate the nouse. In 1984, .EPA and
Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources (PADER) sampling
and monitoring of the structure showed high residual radiation
contamination levels. .An extensive evaluation of the house was
conducted by the u.S. Department of Energy's Argonne National
Laboratory. In 1986, EPA issued a Record of Decision (ROD) which
called for the dismantlement and offsite disposal of the house and
contaminated soils. It was at this time that the location of other
tailings from the operation became an issue as the government
suspected ~at the tailings would contain residual radiation
contamination. No records relating to the ultimate disposition of
those tailings were available.
In May 1991, PADER visited the South Union Avenue/Austin
Avenue location to moni tor for radon because radiation
. contamination had previously been discovered in ~he back yard of
133 Austin Avenue, the property adjacent to the warehouse. During
this visit, radiation survey instruments indicated the presence of
significant levels of radioactive contamination within the house at
that location. PADER obtained soil and wipe samples for further
analysis.
On June 7, 1991, PADER notified EPA of its findings and
requested assistance. A joint PADER-EPA site assessment confirmed
the presence of radiological contamination at 133 Austin Avenue at
levels that warranted immediate action. Based on the data provided
by the PADER analyses and the results of the joint survey, the U.S.
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR)
recommended the relocation of the residents of the house at 133
Austin Avenue and the dismantlement of the warehouse.
On June 19, 1991, a team of radiation specialists from the EPA
National Air and Radiation Environmental Laboratory (NAREL) in
Montgomery, Alabama, arrived to conduct an assessment. The
warehouse and the adjacent residential dwelling (133 Austin Avenue)
were found to be heavily contaminated wi~ radioactive materials.
In November and December of 1991, EPA used a special radiation-
detection van to conduct a 12.5 square mile search in Delaware
County and a small portion of the adjacent City of Philadelphia.
EPA also conducted radiological surveys of the properties which
were suspected to be contaminated. The EPA testing has shown that
approximately 40 properties within a two-mile radius of the site of
the former CUmmings radium processing facility have become
contaminated with radium 226 and thorium 230.
~PA has conducted CERCLA Removal Actions at a number of the
contaminated properties. Removal Actions were selected for those
properties that posed an immediate endangerment and/or which could
-------
4
be addressed using Removal Action authorities within the
constraints of available funding. These Removal Actions have
included the temporary relocation of residents of several of the
properties; complete dismantlement of the warehouse at South Union
and Austin Avenues; dismantlement of the structure at 133 Austin
Avenue; soil removals at a number of the properties; and removals
of plaster, stucco, and concrete at selected properties.
Additional Removal Acti~ns are ongoing.
On July 1, 1993, EPA issued a Proposed Remedial Action Plan
describing five alternatives considered as possible remedial
actions for twenty-one of the parcels subject to this Record of
Decision. The July 1, 1993 Plan also designated EPA's preferred
al ternati ve .for each of the proPerties. EPA requested comments on
the 'Plan and. opened a public comment period. In response to that
Plan, EPA received numerous letters from citizens and public
officials requesting that EPAreconsider its preferred alternatives
for several of the parcels. In addition, EPA gathered additional
information useful in the evaluation of remedial alternatives for
the properties. Following consideration of the .responses to the
first Proposed Remedial Action Plan, and of the above-described
information, EPA issued, on March 2, 1994, a Revised Proposed
Remedial Action Plan for the twenty-two parcels which are subject
to this Record of Decision and opened a public comment period on
the new plan. Notice of a minor modification to the Revised
Proposed Remedial Action Plan was published in local newspapers on
March 30, 1994. A brief discussion of the differences between the
July 1, 1993 Proposed Remedial Action Plan and the March 2, 1994
Revised Proposed Remedial Action Plan is found in section 13 of
this ROD.
3.
COJIMUJIZTY PARTICIPATIOH
The original Proposed Remedial Action Plan, together with
documents supporting that plan (the administrative record file),
were placed by EPA in a public information repository located near
the Si te at the Lansdowne Borough Public Library, Lansdowne,
Pennsylvania and have been available for public review beginning on
July 1, 1993. In addition, Site-rela\:ed documents have been
maintained at the Reqion III office. Notice of the availability of
these documents and a brief description of EPA's Proposed Remedial
Action Plan was published in the PHILADELPHIA INQUIRER on July 1,
1994, and in the NEWS OF DELAWARE COUNTY and the DELAWARE COUNTY
DAILY TIMES on June 30, 1993. In both the Proposed Remedial Action
Plan and the newspaper notifications, the public was advised of the
opportunity for a public meeting. A public comment period was held
from July 1, 1993 to Auqust 31, 1993. A public meeting was held on
July. 19, 1993 at the Yeadon Borough Hall, Yeadon, Delaware county,
penn~ylvania~ Approximately 300 citizens attended that meeting.
-------
5
EPA received more than 750 letters in response to the original
Proposed Remedial Action Plan expressing dissatisfaction with that
Plan. Following careful consideration of these letters and of
additional information relating to the remedial alternatives
described in the July 1993 plan, EPA issued a Revised Proposed
Remedial Action Plan on March 2, 1994. Notification of the
availability of the Revised Plan and the updated administrative
record file was published in the three newspapers noted above. A
public meeting was held on March 15, 1994 at the Beverly Hills
Middle School, Upper Darby, Pennsylvania. On March 30, 1994, EPA
published notice of a minor modification to the Revised Plan
affecting four of the parcels. The notice made clear that comments
submitted during the public comment period could address this
modification., A response to the comments received during the March
2, 1994 through April 30, 1994 public comment period is included in
t;he Responsiveness Summary which is part of this Record of
Decision. Transcripts of both of the public meetings are included
in the Administrative Record for the Site. A brief discussion of
the differences between the July 1, 1993 Proposed Remedial Action
Plan and . the March 2, 1994 Revised Proposed Remedial Action Plan is
found in section 13 of this ROD.
The community participation procedures outlined above were
conducted in compliance with sections 113(k) and 117 of CERCLA, 42
U.S.C. S 9613(k) and 9617. EPA has had extensive contact with
community members from the commencement of response actions at the
Site through the present and has strived to be responsive to all
community concerns.
4.
SCOPE UD ROLE 01' THB RBSPOIISB AC'l'IOIi
This Record of Decision addresses the remedial actions
selected for twenty-two properties within the site that are
presently on the NPL. The properties are in the. municipalities of
Lansdowne Borough, East Lansdowne Borough, Upper Darby Township,
Aldan Borough, and Darby Borough in Delaware County, Pennsylvania
and are identified in Section 1 of this Record of Decision. The
remedial actions selected for these parcels are necessary in order
to respond to environmental and public he~lth threats presented by
contamination at the properties (see Section 5). Eighteen (18)
other properties have been, or are being, cleaned up under EPA's
removal authorities.
EPA is considering appropriate measures to further
characterize .ground water contaminated with uranium recently
discovered (June 1994) in the vicinity of the former cummings
facili ty. EPA does not expect that this ground water contamination
affeqts any of the residential properties listed in this Record of .
Decision. .Remedial actions, if a~y, ~eemed appropriate by EPA to
address th1s ground water contam1nat1on would be announced in a
subsequent Record of Decision.
-------
. .
6
5.
SUMMARY OP SZTB ~RACTBRZSTZCS
The remedial actions selected in this Record of Decision are
intended to address the principal' environmental threat at the
properties presented by the release, or the substantial threat of
release, of hazardous substances from, among other things,
contaminated soils and building materials at each location.
Contamination at each property is summarized as follows:
Lansdowne Borouah
(3)
(4)
(5)
.J'
(1)
216 wayne Avenue - This is a house which was used as a
two-apartment rental property. The renters have been
temporarily relocated by EPA. contaminated areas include
the basement walls, the porch foundation, the fireplace
chimney, and stucco walls. Mortar samples revealed
radium contamination ranging to 637 pico-curies per gram
. (pCi/g). An estimated 104 cubic yards of soil are
contaminated with radium up to 43 pCi/q.
218 wayne Avenue - This is an ,owner-occupied single-
family house in which the owner operated a dental
laboratory. The owner has been temporarily relocated by
EPA. Radiation-contaminated areas include the foundation
walls, support pillars, the chimney, and soil under the
basement floor. Mortar samples revealed radium
contamination ranging to 539 pci/g. An estimated 320
cubic yards of soil are contaminated with radium and show
specific activities ranging to 41.7 pCi/g.
(2)
219 Wayne Avenue - This is a single-family house in which
the owner still resides. Radium contamination is found
in the basement walls, exterior stucco, the porch
foundation, and the fireplace and chimney. Mortar
samples revealed radium contamination rangIng to 647
pCi/g. Approximately 119 cubic yards of soil are
estimated to be contaminated with radium and display
specific activities ranging to 234 pCi/g.
.
42 South union Avenue - The contaminated structure is an
addition to a delicatessen used to store business
supplies. The addition can be removed with minimal
intrusion on the main portion of the building. The
mortar in the brick foundation of the addition has radium
contamination ranging to 240 pCi/g.
6 Bast Pluastea4 Avenue - This is a large single-family -
house in which the owners still reside. Radium
contamination exists in the basement walls and support
pillars and in the porch foundation walls. Mortar
samples display specific activities ranging to 460 pCi/g.
-------
An estimated 197 cubic yards of soil are contaminated
with radium and have specific activities ranging to 123
pci/g.
(6) 10 East Pluastead Avenue -. This is a single-family house
in which the owner still resides. The basement walls and
the stone side walls of the front porch are contaminated
with radium." Mortar between the stones has specific
activities ranging to 249 pCi/g. An estimated 47 cubic
yards of soil are contaminated with radium and have
specific activities ranging to 277 pCi/g.
(7) 16 East Plumstead Avenue - This is a single-family house
in.which the owner still resides. Radium contamination
exists in all basement walls. Mortar samples have
specific activities ranging to 1019 pCi/g. An estimated
53 cubic yards of soil are contaminated with radium with
specific activities ranging to 28.4 pCi/g.
(8) 237 North Lansdovne Avenue - The building at this parcel
is a large single-family house in which the owner still
resides. All basement walls, support columns, the
concrete basement floor, fill material under the concrete
floor, and rubble in a crawl space are contaminated with
radium. Mortar samples have specific activities ranging
to 683 pCi/g. Approximately 153 cubic yards of soil near
the house are contaminated with radium. Specific
activities of soils range to 107 pCi/g.
(9) 133 Austin Avenue - This is a vacant lot measuring 21
feet x 100 feet. The property was cleaned of radioactive
materials by EPA as part of the Removal Action conducted
at the Site. A 3-story house had occupied the lot prior
to EPA's Removal Action. That house was completely
dismantled and disposed of as part of the cleanup of the
property.
(10) Austin Avenue at South Union Avenue - This is an area
formerly occupied by the Cummings processing facility and
includes a portion of the adjacent railroad right-of-way
used by the South Eastern Pennsylvania Transportation
Authority (SEPTA), as well as adjacent portions of South
Union and Austin Avenues. The total land area is
approximately 150 feet x 150 feet. The soils in this
area are contaminated with radium. Specific activities in
the soil samples range to 1471 pCi/g. The contamination
is not uniform over the area, but is found at depths to
24 feet. The contamination also extends under Austin
Avenue and might extend under South Union Avenue. An
estimated 12,000 cubic yards of soils are contaminated.
-------
8
In addition, ground water in the immediate vicinity has
recently been found to be contaminated with uranium
at levels up to 1904 picocuries per liter (pCi/l).
East Lansdowne Borouah
(11) 34 Lewis Avenue - The buildinq at this location is a
sinqle-family house from which the resident owners have
been temporarily relocated by EPA. The property is
extensively contaminated with radium. All basement
walls, the soil under the basement floor, support
pillars, the front sidewalk and the front steps are
contaminated. Mortar in the basement walls has specific
activities ranqinq to 1052 pCi/q. An estimated. 257 cubic
yards of soil are contaminated with radium. Specific
activities of the soils ranqe to 75 pCi/q.
(12) 211 PeDD Boulevar4 - This is a sinqle family house. EPA
has offered the resident owners temporary relocation, but
. they have chosen to remain in the house. The four
basement walls and the porch support columns are
contaminated with radium. Mortar in the basement has
specific activities ranqinq to 1105 pCi/q. Approximately
128 cubic yards of soil are estimated to be contaminated
with radium. Specific activities of the soils ranqe to
180 pCi/q.
(13) 151 LeziDgtoD Avenue - This is a sinqle-family house in
which the upper floor has been converted into an
apartment. The owners still occupy the house. The
basement walls and the plaster on the chimney and
fireplace are contaminated with radium. Specific
activities of the mortar in the basement walls ranqes to
421 pCi/q. An estimated 198 cubic yards of soil are
contaminated and the specific activities ranqe to 118
pCi/q.
UDDer Darby TownshiD
.
(14) 500 Harper Avenue - The buildinq on the property is a
sinqle-family house and the owners have been temporarily
relocated by EPA. The stone walls of the basement, first
floor, and second floor are all contaminated with radium.
Three support columns and the soil/gravel beneath the
concrete basement floor are also contaminated with
radium. specific activities in mortar samples ranqed to
958 pCi/q. An estimated 96 cubic yards of soil outside
the house are contaminated with radium. The specific.
activities of the soils ranqe to 88 pCi/q.
-------
9
(15) 346 OVen Avenue - This is a single-family house which is
currently occupied by the owner. Portions of the
structure contaminated with radium include the concrete
footer of the porch, the stucco on the porch exterior
wall, the west wall foundation footer, and the concrete
slab and associated footers on the northwest 'corner of
the house. The highest specific activity found during
sampling was 479 pCi/g in the porch footer. An estimated
58 cubic yards of soil are contaminated with radium. The
specific activities of the soils range to 127 pCi/g.
(16) 310 Sha4elan4 Avenue - The building at this property is
a mUlti-family rental dwelling with five apartments. The
chimney, fireplaces, porch walls, basement, main entrance
walls, soil under the basement, main entrance floor, and
mortar in the north and south stone walls are
contaminated with radium. Mortar samples revealed
specific activities ranging to 1335 pCi/g. Approximately
6 cubic yards of soils outside the building are estimated
. to be contaminated with radium with specific activities
ranging to 31 pCi/g. .
(17) 3723 Buey Avenue - This is a single-family house in which
the owners still reside. Radium contamination is
extensive and present in all basement walls, the chimney,
the support columns, the east room foundation, the
concrete pad on the south side of the first floor east
room, all second floor stone walls, the third floor west
side stone wall, the front door step and concrete pad,
and the soil under the garage floor. Specific activities
in mortar samples range to 354 pCi/g. An estimated 58
cubic yards of soil are contaminated with radium with
specific activities ranging to 82 pCi/g.
AIdan Borouah
(18) 64 South Clifton Avenue - The building on this parcel is
a single-family dwelling in which the owner still
resides. The stone foundation walls on the north, south,
and west sides of the house, add the support columns on
the east side are contaminated with radium. The soil
under the porch and the mortar in the north wall chimney
are also contaminated with radium. Specific activities
of mortar samples range to 467 pCi/g. Approximately 17
cubic yards of soil are contaminated with radium with
specific activities ranging to 89 pCi/g.
-'
-------
10
Darbv Borou9h
(19) &17/&19 pin. street - This structure is a duplex
(20) currently occupied by the owners. Radium contamination
exists throughout the entire south wall, the entire
firewall which divides the duplex structure, and in a
band (approximately 5-6 bricks wide) at approximately 6
feet above ground across the lengths of the north, east,
and west faces of the duplex. Mortar samples have
specific activities ranging to 671 pCi/g. An estimated
7 cubic yards of soil is contaminated with radium with
sPecific activity of 19 pCi/g.
(21) &21/&23 pine street - Similar to 617/619 Pine Street, the
(22) structure is a duplex occupied by the individual owners.
Radium contamination is present throughout the entire
south, west, and east walls and the south foundation
wall. Specific activities in the mortar range to 567
pCi/g.
&.
SUKMARY OF SITB RISKS
with the exception of the lot at 133 Austin Avenue, all of the
properties listed previously are contaminated with radium 226 and
thorium 230 (remedial action at 133 Austin Avenue is limited to
offsite relocation of the business formerly occupying the structure
dismantled on that parcel). In addition, the property at South
Union Avenue and Austin Avenue (the site of the former cummings
facility) is contaminated with uranium 238. These substances are
radioactive metallic elements and emit both alpha and gamma
radiation. Radium 226 has a half-life of 1,600 years; thorium 230
has a half-life of 80,000 years and uranium 238 has a half-life of
4,500,000,000 years (this means that it will take this long for
one-half of the mass of these contaminants to decay).
Gamma radiation is an external and internal radiation hazard.
It is composed of high energy photons that penetrate through the
skin and, often, through the human body, much like x-rays. Alpha
radiation, comprised of large particles co.posed of two protons and
two neutrons, is the same as the nucleus of a helium atom. These
large particles are associated with a relatively large amount of
energy, but this energy is readily dissipated when it passes
through only a few centimeters of air. It may also be absorbed by
a small amount of matter as thin as a piece of paper or the dead
cell layer on the outer surface of human skin. For this reason,
alpha radiation is an internal hazard to humans and is considered
to be particularly dangerous to the lungs and bones. Both alpha
and g~mma radiation are considered to be carcinogenic to humans.
The radioactive decay of radium 226 results in the production
of radon 222. Radon 222 is a colorless and odorless gas which has
-------
11
a half-life of 3.8 days. The radioactive decay of radon 222
results in the occurrence of several subsequent radioactive
elements - the so-called "radon daughters." These radon daughters
are also alpha and beta emitters and include polonium 218, lead
214, bismuth 214, and polonium 214. .These radioactive elements are
not gases but remain suspended in the air in atomic form. In doing
so, they can become attached to dust and smoke particles which
might potentially be inhaled by people. Upon inhalation, these
radioactive elements lodge in the lung tissue, which has no dead
cell layer to protect itself from the alpha emissions. These alpha
emissions are believed to be a potential cause of lung cancer to
persons exposed to radium contamination.
The threat posed by the contamination at the properties is due
to the significant possibility that radiological contamination may
spread into the environment in an uncontrolled fashion in the
future. The contaminants present within the structures and in
soils outside will most certainly outlast the structures
themselves. As indicated above, radium 226 has a half-life of
1,600 years and thorium 230 has a half-life of 80,000 years.
Before these contaminants cease emitting harmful radiation, the
soils, mortar, stucco, cement, plaster, and other contaminated
materials will very likely be moved off the properties through
renovation or demolition or through other means such as
disintegration or fire. Uncontrolled movement of these materials
creates the risk of further exposure by persons and animals to
radiological contamination. This risk will continue until the
contaminated materials decay completely or until such materials are
removed and properly disposed.
For example, dusts created from repair and renovation work on
contaminated structures could be ingested and inhaled by
construction workers and by nearby residents and visitors in the
surrounding neighborhood. Such repair and renovation work would
probably result in persons being exposed to greater than the non-
occupational inhalation limit of one-tenth of a rem per year (this
does not take into account any other whole body exposure from gamma
radiation that would result from the presence of the radioactive
materials). Contaminated materials removed from the structures
during renovation or demolition and contaminated soils could be
used as fill in other locations resulting in the contamination of
those areas and of persons who may be exposed to them. The
materials could also be disposed of at demolition waste or sanitary
landfills which are not suitable for disposal of radiation-
contaminated materials, resulting in the contamination of these
locations and of persons who may operate such disposal facilities.
A fire at a contaminated structure could result in the release of
radiation-contaminated dusts and the disposal of contaminated
materials in unsuitable locations.
' s
Radium 226, thorium 230, uranium 238, radon 222 and the radon
daughters are all radionuclides. Radionuclides are listed as
-------
12
hazardous substances in federal regulations promulgated at 40
C.F.R. S 302.4 and, therefore, are hazardous substances for the
purposes of the Superfund law. .
Because of the significant possibility that these harmful
contaminants may be moved in an uncontrolled fashion, and thereby
create new risks to human health as a result of such movement well
before the radioactive materials have completely decayed, EPA
believes that actual or threatened releases of hazardous substances
from this Site, if not addressed by proper response actions,
present a current or potential threat to public health, welfare or
the environment.
7.
RZSK ASSBSSKBRT COKCLUSZOH
Actual or threatened releases of radioactive hazardous
substances at the Site, if not addressed by implementing the
response actions selected in this Record of Decision, may present
. an imminent and substantial endangerment to public health, welfare,
or the environment, based on the risks described in section 6.
8.
SUJOIARY 01' AL'1'BRHA'1'ZVBS
This section identifies remedial alternatives identified in
the Revised Proposed Remedial Action Plan and considered for
implementation at each of the twenty-two radiation-contaminated
properties subject to this Record of Decision. With the exception
of the "No Action" alternative, and excluding the remedial action
to be implemented at 133 Austin Avenue, each remedial action
alternative involves, at a minimum, removal, transportation, and
disposal of all radiologically-contaminated building materials and
soils from the property and relocation of persons residing on the
property for at least the duration of the work to be performed at
that location.
In summary, the No Action alternative, which EPA is required
to consider under the NCP, would involve no further remedial action
for that property. The "removal and repai.r" alternative (Alterna-
tive 2) would involve removal of all radiologically-contaminated
material from the property, and measures to restore structures for
continued occupancy. Alternative 3 would permit the parcel owner
to choose either (a) demolition of the radiologically-contaminated
structure and replacement of the structure on the existing lot, (b)
demolition of the radiologically-contaminated structure and
relocation to another parcel, or (c) removal of all radiologically-
contaminated material from the property, and measures to restore
structures for continued occupancy (Alternative 2).
/'
The remedial action al ternati ves are discussed in greater
detail in this section.
-------
13
1.
lIO ACT:IOll
This alternative would involve no further remedial action and
would not require the expenditure of additional funds for remedial
action at the specific property. ~o applicable or relevant and
appropriate requirements (ARARs) are associated with this
alternative.
2.
COll'1'AJaDT:IOH aaoVAL un BU:ILD:ING RSPA:IR
This alternative includes temporary relocation of residents
where required, removal of radiation-contaminated soils and
structural c~mponents of buildings, off site disposal of wastes,
repair of the affected structure, and rehabitation by the
residents.
All soils in residential and potentially residential settings
that have site-related radium 226 contamination in excess of 5
"pico-curies per gram (pCi/g) will also be removed. Properties that
EPA determines are unlikely to become residential will have soils
removed to the 5 pCi/g level if those soils have radium 226
contamination exceeding 5 pCi/g (above background) in the top 15
centimeters and/or 15 pCi/g (above background) in soils below 15
centimeters, averaged over 100 square meters. Institutional
controls to restrict the future construction of residential
dwellings and/or the depth of building footings and foundations
will be implemented if EPA is unable to reduce contamination to the
5 pCi/g level at these non-residential properties.
The costs of this alternative would be different for each of
the properties.
Major federal ARARs for this alternative include 40 C.F.R.
Part 192, Subpart B (standards for Cleanup of Land "and Buildings
Contaminated with Residual Materials from Inactive Uranium
processing Sites) (relevant and appropriate); 10 C.F.R. Part 20,
Subpart D (Radiation Dose Limits for Individual Members of the
Public) (relevant and appropriate); and 40 C.F.R. 5 61.145
(National Emission Standards for Asbestos. Standard for Demolition
and Renovation) (applicable). Major State ARARs include 25 Pa.
Code Chapter 24 (National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants) (limited to adoption of standards set forth in 40
C.F.R. S 61.145) (applicable); 25 Pa. Code 55 123.1 and 123.3
(Prohibition of certain Fugitive Emissions) (Fugitive Particulate
Matter) (applicable); 25 Pa. Code 5 123.31 (emission of malodorous
air contaminants (applicable); 25 Pa. Code 5 123.41 (emission of
visible air contaminants) (applicable); 25 Pa. Code 127.1 (air
contaminant sources) (applicable); and 25 Pa. Code S 219.21(a) (3)
(Maximum Permissible Levels of Radiation from External sources)
(applicable).
-------
14
3.
COBTAJaBAT%OIt -DVM, UD D%SPOSAL MID B%TJDm:
OPT%OIf A: BU%LD%IfG D%SDllTLBIDD1T, COI1TAJaDT%OIf D%8P08AL, UD
BUILDDlG auLACBIIBIIT;
OPT%OIf B: BUILDIIiG D%8DIITLBIIBIJT, COIITAJaDT%Oll D%8P08AL, UD
01'1'8%'1'11 ItBLOCAT I 011 ; OR '
0P'l'%01l C: BU%LD%IIG auUR (AS DI ALTBRDTZVB 2)
For the purposes of this alternative, each propar~y owner
would choose to either have the contaminated structure replaced at
the same location (Op~ioD A); have his/her family relocated to an
offsite parcel containing an existing comparable replacement
structure (Op~ion B); or have the building repaired, where
practicable, as noted above in Alternative 2 (Option C). This
choice would be made by the property owner after issuance of this
Record of Decision, except where EPA has determined that all but
one of the options is impracticable or infeasible (see EPA' s
Selected. Alternatives, below).
All soils in residential and potentially residential settings
that have site-related radium 226 contamination in excess of 5
pico-curies per gram (pCi/g) will also be removed. Properties that
EPA determines are unlikely to become residential will have soils
removed to the 5 pci/g level if those soils have radium 226
contamination exceeding 5 pCi/g (above background) in the top 15
centimeters and/or 15 pCi/g (above background) in soils below 15
centimeters, averaged over 100 square meters. Insti tutional
controls to restrict the future construction of residential
dwellings and/or the depth of building footings and foundations
will be implemented if EPA is unable to reduce contamination to the
5 pCi/q level at these non-residential properties.
Under Option A and Option B of this alternative, contaminated
structures would be completely dismantled and disposed of offsite.
Radiologically-contaminated soil would also be removed and disposed
of offsite.
Under Option A, the Federal Governmellt will fund construction
of a building to replace the structure dismantled by EPA. The new
building will be constructed on the lot previously occupied by the
razed building after all debris and contaminated soils have been
removed from the parcel. The new building will have floor space
approximately equivalent to the floor space of the building that
was dismantled, and will be constructed on the same lot in
accordance with current building codes. It is anticipated that the
newly constructed buildings will retain the same architectural
chara}=ter and "curb appeal" as the existing structures, but will be .
constructed .using modern materials and modern methodologies.
Certain interior and exterior changes might be necessary in order
to meet existing codes, and to accommodate modern construction
-------
15
materials and methods. For example, current stone foundation walls
will be replaced with alternate masonry construction.
The property owners selecting Option A will be presented with,
by the Federal Government, buildinq plans/designs/features which
are as similiar to the current structures as practicable. Each
property owner will participate in the selection of a building
design, materials, and. features for his/her respective property.
Each property owner's selections of designs, materials, and
amenities will be formalized in writing. The Government will then
fund construction of that building. Changes to the design,
materials and features selected by the owner will not be permitted
except to the extent that the owner agrees to pay all costs
associated with such changes and such changes will not
subs~antially delay construction of the building. . Following
completion of the structure, the owner will be relocated back to
the original parcel. The schedule for construction of replacement
buildings cannot be estimated at this time but will depend upon,
among other things, the number of property owners that select
Option Ai the availability of qualified building contractors at the
time the response action .is performed, and the length of time
required to completely dismantle the original structures and clean
the lots. The Federal Government will .cease payment for any
temporary residence at the time the Federal Government determines
that the replacement structure has been completed in accordance
with the plans selected by the owner. The cost of Option A is
different for each property.
Under Option B, EPA will dismantle the contaminated building,
dispose of building and soil wastes offsite, and backfill soil
excavations. No building replacement will take place at the
affected parcel. The Government will acquire the property from the
owner and, if desired by the owner, provide relocation benefits to
which they may be entitled. These benefits include reimbursement
of moving expenses and provision of purchase supplements to enable
the owner to relocate to a comparable replacement property.
With respect to those structures occupied by the owners, a
replacement property available under Option B will be a "comparable
replacement dwelling" within the meaning.of 49 C.F.R. S 24.2(d),
which means that the dwelling will be (1) decent, safe, and
sanitary; (2) functionally equivalent to the razed structure; (3)
adequate in size to accommodate the occupants of the razed
structure i ( 4) in an area not subj ect to unreasonable adverse
environmental conditions; (5) in a location not less desirable than
the location of the razed structure with respect to public
utili ties and commercial and public facilities, and reasonably
accessible to the owner's place of employment i (6) on a si te
typical in size for residential development; (7) on the market and.
avail~ble to the former occupants at the time the relocation must
be performed; and (8) within th~ financial means of the relocated
persons. The owners of propert1es not used as a residence for the
-------
16
owners will be provided wi th a comparable replacement property
which meets the eiqht criteria described above. Offsite
relocations under Op~ion B will be performed usinq procedures and
practices currently used in administerinq the Uniform Relocation
Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act (42 U.S.C.
Chapter 61) and its implementinq requlations (49 C.F.R. Part 24) to
the maximum extent practicable. Under those procedures, ti tIe to
the oriqinal parcel will be acquired by the United states in order
to perform the relocatfon. Pursuant to section 104(j) of CERCLA,
42 U.S.C. S 9604(j), the Commonwealth of pennsysvania must aqree to
accept transfer of the property followinq completion of the
remedial action. The cost of implementinq this option would vary
accordinq to the individual properties involved.
At those parcels where owners select Op~ion C,. EPA will
implement all actions described in Alternative 2, above. The costs
of this alternative would be different for each of the properties.
ARARs for Alternative 3 are the su;, as for Alternative 2.
9.
S1JKMARY OP HB COMPARATIVB ADLYSIS OP ALTBRRATIVBS
This section provides a description of the nine criteria EPA
is required to consider under CERCLA and the NCP in evaluating
remedial alternatives and an analysis of the alternatives
considered by EPA for implementation at the properties covered by
this Proposed Remedial Action Plan. The nine criteria are:
(1)
(2)
(3)
I'"
OVerall Pro~ec~ion of Human Heal~h and BDviroDJDen~. This
criteria addresses whether the remedial alternative can
adequately protect human health and the environment from
unacceptable risks posed by the hazardous substances by
eliminatinq, reducinq, or controllinq exposures to levels
established durinq development of remediation standards.
Comcliance .i~b ARARs. This criteria addresses whether
the remedial alternative can attain applicable or
relevant and appropriate requirements under federal
environmental laws and state environmental or facility
si tinq laws or provide qround!; for invokinq a waiver
established under CERCLA.
Lona-Term Bffectiveness and Permanence. This criteria
refers to the ability of an alternative to maintain
reliable protection of human health and the environment
over time and considers, amonq other thinqs, the
maqni tude of residual risk remaininq from untreated waste
or treatment residuals and the adequacy and reliability
of containment or institutional controls.
-------
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
17
R.due~ioD of Toziei~v. Ko~ili~v. or Volume Throu9h
TreatmeD~. This criteria addresses the deqree to which
an alternative employs treatment methods to reduce the
toxicity, mobility, or volume of hazardous substances at
the site.
8hor~-T.ra Bffee~iveDess. This criteria addresses short-
term impacts -of an alternative on, among others things,
the communi ty , workers, and the environment dur inq
implementation of the al ternati ve until protection is
achieved.
I.plemeD~abili~y. This criteria refers to the ease or
ditficulty of implementing an alternative and includes,
among other things, technical feasibility, administrative
feasibility, and availability of services and materials.
Cos~. This criteria requires evaluation of the capital
costs, annual operation and maintenance costs, and net
present value of such costs. -
S~a~e Aecep~aDce. This criteria requires consideration
of the state's - position and key concerns relating to
EPA's preferred remedial alternative and other
alternatives and the state's comments on ARARs or the
proposed use of waivers.
commUDi~v AeeeataDee. This criteria requires
consideration of the community's concerns on the proposed
remedial action plan articulated during the comment
period.
OVERALL PRCTBClIOIt 0., HUJQJf JIBAL'l'B AIfI) DB BI1VJ:ROIDIBIft'
Alternative 1 (No Action) provides no protection. The
remaining two alternatives provide adequate protection of public
health, welfare and the environment. In Alternatives 2 and 3, all
radiation-contaminated structural componeQts of the buildings will
be removed offsite to a permitted radiation waste disposal
facility. All soils in residential and potentially residential
settings that have site-related radium 226 contamination in excess
of 5 pico-curies per qram (pCi/g) will also be removed.
The cleanup of soils to 5 pCi/g will result in radon 222
concentrations, in future homes built on the affected properties,
which are no qreater than the radon 222 concentrations that would
have resulted if the site-related radium 226 contamination had not
occurred.
-------
18
Properties that are unlikely to become residential will have
soils removed to the 5 pCi/g level as noted above if those soils
have radium 226 contamination exceeding 5 pCi/g (above backqround)
in the top 15 centimeters and/or 15 pCi/g (above backqround) in
soils below 15 centimeters, averaged over 100 square meters.
Properties in this category include streets, parks, and- railroad
rights-of-way.
Alternatives 2 and 3 will render the residential properties
available for unlimited access and unrestricted use. Complete
cleanup of the contamination at the former cummings facility and
the adjacent streets and railroad right-of-way.to the 5 pCi/g level
prescribed for residential properties might prove to be
impracticabl~. Such properties where cleanup to the residential
level is impracticable will require institutional controls to
restrict the future construction of residential dwellings and/or
the depth of building footings and foundations.
COKPL:IAlfCB nTH ARARS
Alternative 1 (No Action) does not trigger ARARs.
alternatives, including EPA's preferred - alternative
property, will comply with all Federal and State ARARs.
The other
for each
LOIIG-TBlUI BPJ'BCT:IVBIIB88 AIm PBRKAIIDCB
The No Action alternative would have no effect on the existing
contamination. Each of the other alternatives will result in the
elimination of the site-related radiation contamination where such
contamination currently exists. Under Alternatives 2 and 3, the
contaminated wastes will be removed offsite to a permitted
radiation waste disposal facility; the properties which are
currently residential will be available for unlimited access and
unrestricted use. The former CUmmings facility property and
streets, parks, and railroad rights-of-way that have radium 226
contamination exceeding 5 pci/g (above backqround) in the top 15
centimeters and/or 15 pCi/g (above backqround) in soils below 15
centimeters, averaged over 100 square meters, may require
insti tutional controls to restrict the future construction of
residential dwellings and/or the depth of building footings and
foundations if EPA is unable to reduce contamination to the 5 pCi/g
level.
RBDUCT%ON OP TOX:IC:ITY, XOB:IL:ITY,
OR VOLUXB TJlROUGB ftBATKBN'r
.J"
No reductions of toxicity, mobility, or volume through
treatment of the wastes are anticipated at this time under any of
-------
19
the alternatives. Radiation-contaminated wastes will be shipped
offsite for disposal at a permitted facility.
8BORT-TBRM BPFBCTrvBHBS8
The No Action alternative would have no short-term
effectiveness. Under Alternatives 2 and 3, the resident owners and
tenants of occupied structures will be relocated during
implementation of the remedial action. The remedial activities
will be conducted so as to prevent radiation exposure to the local
residents and to site workers.
XMPLBKBHTABILITY
The No Action alternative requires no further remedial action
and implementation is therefore not relevant. The remaining two
alternatives are implementable to varying deqrees depending on
structural design and inteqrity and the deqree to which each
affected structure is contaminated. .
Alternative 2 (and Alternative 3,. Option C), building
decontamination and repair, is the least disruptive to the lives of
the affected owners as it will leave the existing residence in
place. However, this alternative is practicable only for 346 OWen
Avenue, 211 Penn Boulevard, 6 and 10 East Plumstead Avenue, and 151
Lexinqton Avenue as these structures are less contaminated relative
to the other affected structures and/or are more readily repairable
given the extent and location of such contamination. At these
locations, Alternative 2 (and Alternative 3, Option C) might
require temporary relocation of residents for up to one year.
Alternative 3, Option A, demolition and rebuilding of the
structures, is implementable for most of the existing structures,
but with certain changes in design. Design change~ would be
necessary because of the unavailability of certain construction
materials and the requirements of current construction codes. The
houses at 500 Harper Avenue and 3723 Huey Avenue, for example, are
stone structures from the basements to the rooflines; this type of
construction is essentially unavailable !oday. In addition, the
small size of certain lots (~, 133 Austin Avenue) will preclude
the construction of replacement structures having equivalent floor
space while complying with current building codes. Further,
Alternative 3, option A, is less implementable than option B
(permanent offsite relocation) and Option C (contamination removal
and building repair) to the extent that Option A would require a
significantly qreater de~ee of management oversight for a longer
period than would be requ~red for the other options and because of .
the poten~ial complicatio~s associ~ted with housing construction.
Note opt~ons A and C w~ll requ~re two relocation events per
structure (relocation off-site during contamination removal and
-------
20
buildinq repair or construction and relocation back to the finished
structure) for those resident owners who have not been relocated
offsite. Option B would, in some cases, entail only one relocation
event (relocation to the Permanent replacement dwellinq).
Relocation to the temporary residence while the affected. structure
is demolished and rebuilt may be necessary for one year or lonqer.
Alternative 3, Option B (permanent off-site relocation) is
readily implementable for all structures, except 42 South Union
Avenue (the structure to be dismantled is a small addition to a
delicatessen for which a comparable structure is not likely to be
available offsite). Unlike Option A (demolition and rebuildinq of
the structures), Option B may in some cases invol ve only one
relocation e.vent where an offsite structure is found prior to
remediation at the affected structure. .
COST
, .
I
The. No Action alternative would involve no .further costs for
remedial action. Alternative 2 (and Alternative 3, Option C),
buildinq repair, was considered to be cost-effective only for 6 and
10 East Plumstead Avenue, 211 Penn Boulevard, 151 Lexinqton Avenue,
and 346 OWen Avenue. Alternative 3, Option A, was considered for
all of the properties except for 133 Austin Avenue (1;he lot at that
location is too narrow to allow rebuildinq under current
ordinances) and the former CUmminqs warehouse buildinq (the
warehouse was structurally deficient for reasons unrelated to the
contamination, and was in danqer of collapse). Option B was
considered for all of the properties except 42 S. Union (an offsite
structure would be an impracticable replacement of the delicatessen
addition at 42 S. Union Avenue) and the former CUmminqs facility
location (see above). Cost estimates to implement the various
al ternati ves are expressed as present values and are shown in Table
1. In that table, EPA' s selected remedies are indicated wi th
asterisks (*). All costs are estimates that may vary accordinq to
the accuracy of current contamination reports, lenCJths of time
required to implement the remedial actions at the individual
properties, actual bids received from remedial contractors and
other factors. ~
The cost estimates listed include the costs of temporary
relocation of residents, where applicable, for Alternatives 2 and
3. The temporary relocation costs are estimated at $2000 per month
for a period of one year. Therefore, the cost estimates for
Alternatives 2 and 3 include an estimated $24,000 temporary
relocation cost per household for owner-occupied dwellinqs. Since
617/619 and 621/623 Pine street are twin houses, each represents
two households. In these instances, the cost estimates for.
Alternative 3, options A and B (repair is not practicable), include
an estimated $48,000 temporary relocation cost to accommodate the
two households in each twin house.
-------
21
. No cost estimates are qiven for any of the properties under
Alternative 2 (or Alternative 3, Option C), except for 6 and 10
East Plumstead Avenue, 211 Penn Boulevard, 151 Lexinqton Avenue,
and 346 OWen Avenue, because buildinq repairs are not feasible.
The cost estimate shown under Alternative 3, Option A, for 42
South Union Avenue is for the demolition, removal, and reconstruc-
tion of an unoccupied addition to a delicatessen. Repairs would be
made to the adjacent property, as required.
,
,
-------
'-
. ~
TABLE 11 PRESENT VALUE ESTIMATES
"
Address Alt. 2 Alt. 3A Alt. 3B Alt. 3C
216 Wayne Ave. N/A *1,031,000 * 930,150 N/A
218 Wayne Ave. N/A *1,325,500 * 1,253,450 N/A
219 Wayne Ave. N/A * 880,500 * 741,450 N/A
237 N. Lansdowne N/A *1,293,600 * 1,077,250 N/A
6 E. Plumstead 924,300 *1,099,800 * 904,900 * 924,300
10 E. Plumstead 619,400 * 857,600 * 636,600 * 619,400
16 E. Plumstead N/A * 897,500 * 695,700 N/A
133 Austin Ave. N/A N/A * 60,000 N/A
42 S. Union N/A * 267,000 N/A N/A
500 Harper N/A *1,075,100 * 936,500 N/A
346 Owen Ave. * 447,200 720,200 533,550 447,200
310 Shadeland N/A * 915,400 * 696,775 N/A
3723 Huey A",e. N/A *1,122,500 * 1,017,425 N/A
64 S. Clifton N/A * 638,400 * 548,750 N/A
34 Lewis Ave. N/A *1,221,700 * 1,123,400 N/A
211 Penn Blvd. 704,500 * 780,700 .* 613,200 * 704,500
151 Lexington 845,900 * 822,800 * 744,525 * 845,900
617/619 pine N/A * 637,200 * 483,100 N/A
621/623 pine N/A * 574,500 * 437,050 N/A
Former Cummings N/A * N/A N/A
Facility property 23,100,000
(SOILS)
,
~
"
I
. t,
-------
23
Most of the properties will require some removal of radiation-
contaminated soil. Soil amounts vary with location. Cost
estimates for soil remediation for the various properties are
included in the estimates shown in Table 1. .
Approximately 12,000 cubic yards of soil are contaminated at
the former cummings facility property at South Union and Austin
Avenues. This soil wiIl be removed and disposed at an estimated
cost of $1920 per cubic yard. Building replacement at this
property (exclusive of the former cummings warehouse which was
structurally deficient for reasons unrelated to the contamination
and was in danger of collapse) is estimated to cost approximately
$60,000, and soil cleanup is estimated to cost $23,040,000, for a
total of $23;100,000. .
The total estimated cost of EPA' s selected al ternati ves ranges
from approximately $36,642,250 (assuming that Option A is chosen by
all property owners to whom it is available) to approximately
. $38,581,200 (assuming that Option B is chosen by all property
owners to whom it is available).
STATB ACCEPTANCE .
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania has reviewed and commented on
a draft of the Record of Decision. The Commonwealth concurs with
the selected remedies. A copy of the concurrence letter is
attached.
COKKUHITY ACCBPTANCB
The preferences for remediation which have been expressed by
the individual property owners verbally and by letter to EPA have
been carefully considered by EPA for the purposes of this Record of
Decision. Numerous citizens and public officials commented on the
Revised Proposed Remedial Action Plan.
10.
THE SELECTBD RBKBDIBS
After careful evaluation of the remedial action alternatives,
the nine criteria set forth in the NCP, and the public comments,
EPA has selected remedial action alternatives for each of the
respective properties subject to this Record of Decision. The
remedial actions will be implemented in accordance with the
Performance Standards identified in Section 11 of this Record of
Decisjon. The remedial actions selected by EPA are as follows:
-------
24
LaDSd01m8 Borouah
216 Wayne Avenue:
218 Wayne Avenue:
219 Wayne Avenue: .
237 North Lansdowne Avenue:
6 East Plumstead Avenue:
10 East Plumstead Avenue:
16 East Plumstead Avenue:
42 South Union Avenue:
133 Austin Avenue:
Alternative 3
Alternative 3
Alternative 3
Alternative 3
Alternative 3
Alternative 3
Alternative 3
Alternative 3Al
Alternative 3B2
The site of the former
~ings facility at S.
Union Ave. and Austin Avenue: Alternative 3A3 .
. Uooer Darbv T01mshi9
500
. 346
310
3723
Harper Avenue:
OWen Avenue:
Shadeland Avenue:
Huey Avenue:
AIdan Borouah
64 South Clifton Avenue:
Bast Lansdowne Borouqh
34 Lewis Avenue:
211 Penn Boulevard:
151 Lexington Avenue:
Alternative 3
Alternat,ive 2
Alternati"e 3
Alternative 3
Alternative 3
Alternative 3
Alternative 3
Alternative 3
1 Replacement of the storage .area addition to the
delicatessen at this property with an offsite storage area would be
impracticable.
2 EPA has determined that a replacement structure cannot be
constructed on this parcel under current building codes.
3 The former cummings facility building would be neither
rebuilt nor replaced with an off-site structure since the building
was. structurally deficient for reasons unrelated to the.
contamination and was in danger of collapse prior to demolition by
EPA. Replacement of the "wood shop" building with an off-site
property would be impractical.
-------
25
Darby Borouah
617 Pine
619 pine
621 Pine
623 Pine
street:
street:
street:
street:
Alternative 34
Alternative 34
Alternative 34
Alternative 34
In summary, at this time the selected alternative for each
property, as described above, is believed to provide the best
balance of trade-offs among the alternatives with respect to the
criteria used to evaluate remedies. Based on the information
available at this time, therefore, EPA believes that the selected
alternatives.~will be protective, will attain ARARs, will be cost-
effective, and will utilize permanent solutions and alternative
treatment technologies or resource recovery technologies to the
maximum extent practicable. The selected alternatives do not
satisfy the preference for treatment as a principal element since
the radiation-contaminated materials will be landfilled at a
permitted offsite disposal facility because the various radioactive
elements cannot be destroyed.
EPA selected Al ternati ve 2, contamination removal and building
repair, for 346 OWen Avenue over Alternative 3 principally because
the contamination within the structure at this property is found at
levels and locations which permit complete remediation with minimal
impact to the building itself. EPA cannot justify complete demoli-
tion of the structure nor permanent off-site relocation under these
circumstances.
Factors which led EPA to select Alternative 3 (which offers,
in most instances, either Government-funded rebuilding of the
structures (OptioD A)i off-site relocation (OptiOD B)i or building
repair in accordance with Alternative 2 (OptioD C» for the
remainder of the properties include implementabil ty and public
acceptance. While structures on several properties may be repaired
without demolishing the entire structure, the work required to
remove contamination in many of these cases involves, among other
tasks, suspension of the structures and excavation of foundations.
For these properties, the difference in.implementablity between
complex repair work and complete demolition is insignificant. The
added management oversight required to rebuild the structures over
that required to provide off-site relocations was weighed against
the almost universal desire by property owners to have a choice in
deciding whether to remain on their property (once cleaned) and by
neighboring residents and community officials concerned about empty
lots in the affected neighborhoods (traditional relocations per-
"4 Rebuilding on-si te can occur only if the owner of each
residence in the duplex chooses this option. A single-family house
cannot be constructed on each lot under current building codes.
-------
1-
26
formed under the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property
Acquisition Policies Act (42 U.S.C. Chapter 61) would result in
off-site relocations and clean, empty parcels which would be turned
over to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania). On balance, EPA
determined that both sets of concerns could be best addressed by
allowing each affected property owner to choose between the three
options offered in Alternative 3.
11.
PBRPORMUICB STAlJDUDS
Performance of the selected remedial actions will result in
removal and disposal of all Site-related radiation contamination
currently in ,the buildings at all of the properties subject to this
Record of Decision. All Site-related soil contamination at resi-
dential and potentially residential properties will be removed so
that no sample of soils remaining following the remedial action
will contain radium 226 concentrations exceeding 5.0 pCi/g. Site-
related contamination in soils on public-use properties that EPA
determines are unlikely to become residential (~, streets and
railroad rights-of-way) will be remediated if radium 226
concentrations in those soils exceed 5 pCi/g in the top 15
centimeters of soil and/or 15 pCi/g in subsoils, averaged over 100
square meters, per the requirements of 40 C.F.R. S 192.12(a). In
those public-use areas which are found to exceed the standards set
forth at 40 C.F.R. S 192(a), soil remediation will be accomplished
such that no sample of soil remaining following the remediation
will contain radium 226 concentrations exceeding the 5.0 pCi/g
standard set in this ROD for residential soils. Institutional
controls to restrict the future construction of residential
dwellings and/or the depth of building footings and foundations
will be implemented if EPA is unable to reduce contamination to the
5 pCi/g level at these non-residential properties.
The remediation of soil areas will include backfilling of
excavations, where appropriate, with clean soil and revegetation to
inhibit soil erosion. Public use areas such as streets, sidewalks,
and railroads will be restored to the uses that those properties
served prior to the remedial action.
.
12.
STATUTORY DB'l'BIUO:HATXORS
This remedy satisfies the remedy selection requirements of
CERCLA and the NCP. The remedy is expected to be protective of
pUblic health and welfare and the environment, complies with ARARS,
is cost-effective, and utilizes permanent solutions and alternative
treatment technologies to the maximum extent practicable. Because
contaminated materials will be transported offsite for landfilling .
at p~rmitted facilities, the remedy does not meet the statutory
preference for treatment as a principal element of the remedy. The
-------
27
following is a discussion of how the selected remedial actions
address these statutory requirements:
Pro~ec~ioD of PUblic B..l~h
&DeS .elfare &DeS ~h. .DvirolU8.D~
The selected remedial actions protect public health and
welfare and the environment by cleaning the properties subject to
this Record of Decision such that levels of radioactive substances
will not exceed health-based criteria.
coapliance .i~h Applicable or Relev&D~
.DeS Appropria~e Requir..eD~8
These standards are considered applicable to the" remedial
actions:
All asbestos removal activities during the remedial actions
will comply with 40 C.F.R. 5 61. 145 (National Emission standards
for Asbestos; Standard for Demolition and Renovation) and 25 Pa.
Code Chapter 24 (National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants) (limited to adoption of standards set forth in 40
C.F.R. 5 61.145). :In addition, all excavation, dismantlement,
demolition, and construction activities will comply with 25 Pa.
Code 5S 123.1 and 123.3 (Prohibition of Certain Fugitive Emissions)
(Fugitive Particulate Matter); 25 pa Code 5 123.31 (emission of
malodorous air contaminants); 25 Pa. Code 5 123.41 (emission of
visible air contaminants); 25 Pa. Code 5 219.21(a) (3) (Maximum
Permissible Levels Of Radiation from External Sources).
These standards are considered relevant and appropriate to the
remedial actions:
Contaminated soils on public use properties will be remediated
if radium 226 contamination in those soils equals or exceeds the
action levels set forth in 40 C.F.R. Part 192, SubpartB (Standards
for Cleanup of Land and Buildings contaminated with Residual
Materials from :Inactive Uranium Processing Sites). Radiation
exposures will comply with the provisions of 10 C.F.R. Part 20,
Subpart D (Radiation Dose Limits for Individual Members of the
Public). .
C08~ Bffec~iv.De88
Once protectiveness has been established, cost effectiveness
is determined by comparing the costs of the alternatives being
considered with the overall effectiveness of each alternative to
determine whether an alternative represents a reasonable value for
the mpney to be spent. The remedies selected are judged to afford
overall effectiveness proportional to their costs such that the
remedies represent good val~es. When the relationship between the
costs and overall effect1veness of the selected remedies is
-------
28
compared to the costs and effectiveness of the other alternatives,
the selected remedies are judged to be more cost effective.
utilisation of Peraan8nt solutions and
Alternativ8 Traata8nt ~8chDologi8s to
the xaziaua Bzt8nt practicable
EPA has determined that the selected remedial actions
represent the maximum extent to which permanent solutions and
alternative treatment technologies can be utilized while providing
the best balance among the other evaluation criteria at this time.
The remedies provide the best balance in terms of the nine
evaluation criteria.
13.
BXPLAllAT:ION OP S:IGNZP:ICAHT CHANGBS
A.
The Pro~osed Remedial Action Plan and Revised Pro~osed
Remedial Action Plan.
On July 1, 1993, EPA issued a Proposed Remedial Action Plan
describing five alternatives considered as possible remedial
actions for twenty-one of the parcels subject to this Record of
Decision. The July 1, 1993 Plan also designated EPA's preferred
alternative for each of the properties. In the July 1, 19~3 Plan,
EPA expressed its preference to remove contamination and repair the
affected structure at only one of the properties, dismantle
contaminated structures and perform off-site relocations at sixteen
properties, and dismantle an additional four contaminated
structures without performing relocation or replacing ~e
structures. Numerous comments from citizens and local officials
requested that EPA consider remedial options that would permit
affected residents to return to newly constructed homes on their
original properties. Comments additionally sought relief for
owners of contaminated commercial structures, who would not receive
a replacement buildings under the URA. EPA also obtained
information relating to repair options not previously considered.
These options enabled the Agency to consider building repairs for
a larger number of affected structures.
.
Following consideration of the responses to the July 1, 1993
Proposed Remedial Action Plan, and of the above-described
information, EPA issued, on March 2, 1994, a Revised Proposed
Remedial Action Plan for the twenty-two parcels which are subject
to this Record of Decision. In the March 2, 1994 Revised Plan, EPA
expanded the number of structures for which repair is practicable
to five, offered most property owners the option of off-site
relocation under the URA or "on-site" relocation into newly
const;:-ucted homes to be built once the lots are cleaned, and.
provided for replacement of commercial structures that would be
dismantled.
-------
29
B.
of
the Revised
ProDosed
Chanaes Followina Issuance
Remedial Action Plan.
In the March 2, 1994 Revised Proposed Remedial Action Plan,
EPA expressed a preference for, amonq other thinqs, the .removal of
contaminated portions of the structures located at 151 Lexinqton
Avenue, 211 Penn Boulevard, 10 East Plumstead Avenue, and 6 East
plumstead Avenue, and the repair of those structures as described
for Alternative 2. After further consideration, EPA announced at
a public meetinq on March 15, 1994 that it would offer the owners
of those properties the choice of options available under
Al ternati ve 3. Subsequent to this announcement, EPA issued a
letter, dated March 23, 1994, to the owner of each property
proposed for remedial action, the municipalities, and the
Commonwealth 'of Pennsylvania explaining the change. Additionally,
an announcement of the chanqe was published in the PHILADELPHIA
rNQUIRER, the NEWS OF DELAWARE COUNTY, and the DELAWARE COUNTY
DAILY TIMES on March 30, 1994.
.
/
-.
-------
./
FIGURE 1
-------
Tne map above of eastern 'Delaware County outlines the tWo-mile radius where EPA's scanner van mc:JSu~ for radium.
-------
.;
RESPONSIVENESS SUMMARY
-------
RBSPOBS:rvBHBSS StJlllmRy
On July 1, 1993, EPA issued a Proposed Remedial Action Plan
describing five alternatives considered as possible remedial
actions for twenty-one of the parcels subject to this Record of
Decision. The July 1, 1993 Plan also designated EPA's preferred
alternative for each of the properties. EPA requested comments
on the Plan and opened a public comment period. In response to
that Plan, EPA received numerous letters from citizens and public
officials requesting that EPA reconsider its preferred
alternatives for several of the parcels. In addition, EPA
gathered additional information useful in the evaluation of
remedial alternatives for the properties. Following
consideration of the responses to the first Proposed Remedial
Action Plan, and of the above-described information, EPA issued,
on March 2, 1994, a Revised Proposed Remedial Action Plan
(Revised PRAP) for the twenty-two parcels which are subject to
this Record of Decision and opened a public comment period on the
new plan. Notice of a minor modification to the Revised PRAP was
published in local newspapers on March 30, 1994. A brief
,discussion of the differences between the July 1, 1993 Proposed
Remedial' Action Plan and the March 2, 1994 Revised PRAP is found
in section 13 of the ROD.
In compliance with sections 113(k) and 117 of CERCLA, the
RevisedPRAP and the Administrative Record file were placed for
public inspection at the Lansdowne Borough Library, Lansdowne,
Delaware County, Pennsylvania. An announcement of the
availability of these documents was placed in three locally-
available newspapers on March 2, 1994 and a Public Comment Period
was held from March 2, 1994 to April 30, 1994. Additionally, a
Public Meeting was held on March 15, 1994 at the Beverly Hills
Middle School, Upper Darby Township, Pennsylvania, and individual
copies of the Revised PRAP were distributed to the individual
property owners whose properties were the subject of the Revised
PRAP, to the affected municipalities, and to the Pennsylvania
Department of Environmental Resources.
, EPA received ten letters responding to the Revised PRAP
during the public comment period, and one set of tax revenue
calculations was received by EPA from a citizen during the March
5, 1994 public meeting. The following i~ a summary of the
significant comments to the Revised PRAP and EPA's responses to
those comments:
Comment: A commentor suggested that the houses that are proposed
for remedial action and that are currently unoccupied should be
the first to be remediated.
Response: The chronology for remedial actions at the various
properties will be determined by several factors including the
actu~l endangerment to any residents still residing at the
properties, the remedial action option selected by the individual
property owners, the schedule designated by the selected remedial
-------
2
action contractor(s), and the manpower needed and available to
perform the remedial action. The sequence of work will be set
during pre-construction meetings among EPA, the u.s. Army Corps
of Engineers and the remedial action contractor.
Comment: A request was made that EPA rebuild houses on all lots
in the Borough of Lansdowne, even in those circumstances in which
the property owner(s) bave chosen off-site relocation.
Response: EPA will rebuild houses only in those instances in
which the owner(s) chose onsite relocation. EPA cannot expend
superfund monies for purposes unrelated to the implementation of
the remedial action. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania will take
title to those properties on which replacement structures will
not be buil~ under this remedial action.
Comment: A request was made that EPA rebuild houses which will
closely duplicate the pre-existing structures on the
decontaminated lots.
Response: EPA intends to rebuild the houses, in those instances
where the owners choose onsite relocation, such that those houses
will have, to the extent practicable, the same architectural
design and "curb appeal" as the pre-existing structures.
Comment: A request was made that EPA conduct further testing for
radiation-contaminated houses in the Borough of Lansdowne.
Response: EPA believes that all site-related soil and structural
contamination within a two-mile radius of the former cummings
facility (Austin Avenue at South Union Avenue) has been
discovered by EPA. EPA believes that the assessment of the two-
mile radius area (comprising approximately 12.5 square miles) was
a very reasonable and practicable approach to identifying the
extent of contamination. EPA is confident that all substantial
soil and structural contamination from the former cummings
operation has been located. EPA has recently confirmed that
groundwater in the vicinity of the former cummings facility is
radiologically contaminated and intends to investigate this
contamination. Such investigation, and apy response actions
which may be performed following such investigation, are not part
of the remedial actions selected in this ROD.
'Comment: A request was made that EPA provide some form of
certification to the owners of the properties specifying that the
properties are free of radiation contamination following the
remedial action.
Response: The remedial action contractor will submit a report
for each of the properties. That report will indicate that the
remedial action requirements designated in the ROD have been
accomplished. The report(s) will be available to the property
-------
3
owners.
Comment: A request was made that EPA provide monthly reports to
the Borough of Lansdowne to inform the Borough of all a~tions
that are being considered or being undertaken by EPA.
Response: EPA intends.to keep municipal and state officials
fully advised of Site-related activities.
Comment: A suggestion
headed by residents be
those houses for which
option.
was made that a non-profit corporation
funded by EPA to perform the rebuilding of
the owners choose the onsite relocation
..
Response: The on-site replacement of structures will be
performed by EPA through the u.s. Army Corps of Enqineers as part
of a remedial action for which EPA is responsible. Close
coordination between EPA, the Corps, and the affected homeowners
during the design phase will ensure that replacement structures
preserve the original character of the structures and surrounding
neighborhoods to the maximum extent practicable. Architects and
building contractors will be selected through appropriate
government procurement practices which will assure that EPA's
remedial action requirements are achieved. Property owners will
have ample opportunity to participate in decisions affecting
replacement of their homes. While EPA may not, as the comment or
points out, have expertise in home building, the Agency will
secure that expertise through existing contracting mechanisms and
will not delegate authority to execute any portion of the
remedial action to a non-profit corporation.
Comment: A commentor requested t-~at local ordinances, including
municipal building codes, should be listed as applicable or
relevant and appropriate requirements (ARARs).
Response: Municipal ordinances, including buildinq codes, are
not ARARs as defined under CERCLA because they are neither
Federal nor state environmental requirements and, as such, are
not listed as ARARs in the ROD. However, construction conducted
by EPA will conform to municipal buildin~ codes to the maximum
extent practicable.
Comment: A commentor expressed concern that residents who are
temporarily relocated for the purposes of the remedial action
will not be adequately provided for.
Response: All temporary relocations will be conducted pursuant
to the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real
Prope~ty Acquisition policies Act of 1970, as amended, 42 U.S.C.
S 4601 et seq., which provides for, among other things, temporary
housing of displaced persons. The temporary relocations will be
conducted through the u.s. Army Corps of Engineers.
-------
4
Comment: A commentor suggested that, for any residential
property for which the repair option is selected, EPA should
repair not only those portions of the property that are
remediated to remove radiation contamination, but also any
uncontaminated areas of the house(s) on which maintenance was
deferred by the owner(s). .
Response: EPA will repair only those portions of each property
that must be destroyed, under the repair option, to remediate the
contaminated portions of each property. EPA may use Superfund
monies to repair damage resulting from contamination but may not
make other repairs to the properties.
Comment: A commentor expressed concern that the entire amount of
a mortgage m1ght become due and payable by the owner(s) in the
event that a house is dismantled for the purposes of a remedial
action.
Response: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has considered this
matter and will work with the mortgagees to assure them that the
loss of collateral (the houses) is temporary and that, in the
cases of onsite relocation, new dwellings will be rebuilt to
continue security for the mortgages.
Comment: A comment or expressed that, in those instances where
onsite relocation is chosen, that EPA should state, at the
completion of the remedial action for each property, that the
property in question is no longer considered by EPA to be part of
the site.
Response: Each property which undergoes remedial action will
remain on the Superfund National Priorities List (the "NPL")
until deleted from that listing through the formal process
required pursuant to the NCP.
Comment: A commentor requested that EPA state in the ROD that
the remedial action selected for the Site is the only action
contemplated to address contamination at the Site.
Response: The remedial actions selected.in the ROD are the sole.
remedial actions that will be implemented at the residential
properties identified in the ROD. EPA does not expect that
uranium-contaminated ground water recently discovered in the
immediate vicinity of the former CUmmings facility affects any of
these residential properties. Remedial actions, if any, deemed
appropriate by EPA to address this ground water contamination
would be announced in a subsequent Record of Decision.
Comment: A commentor requested an explanation of how the present
value shown in the Revised PRAP for 133 Austin Avenue was
determined and also requested that EPA consider increasing that
value.
-------
5
Response: The present value of the property at 133 Austin Avenue
was derived by adding the estimated market value of the property
(uncontaminated) plus a reasonable contingency amount which might
be necessary in order to provide a comparable replacement
property. All real estate transactions relative to this property
will be conducted by the u.s. Army Corps of Engineers using the
provisions of the URA. .
Comment: A. commentor suggested that either the Agency for Toxic
Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) or EPA should make health
surveillance available to the residents of the site.
Response: ATSDR is authorized to implement medical surveillances
pursuant to section 104(i) (9) of CERCLA. Such programs are
initiated where ATSDR determines that there is a significant
increased risk of adverse health effects from exposure to
hazardous substances released from a site. ATSDR has not made
such a determination under section 104(i) (9) of CERCLA and,
therefore, no surveillance is currently planned for this site.
Comment:
houses.
A commentor commended EPA for its proposal to rebuild
Response: EPA has endeavored to be responsive to the community's
concerns throughout the remedy selection process. Onsite
replacement structures will be provided in those instances in
which the property owners choose onsite relocation. No
structures will be rebuilt on those properties for which the
owners choose offsite relocation.
Comment: Homeowners insisted that their houses not necessarily
be repaired as provided in the March 2, 1994 Revised PRAP, but
that they (the homeowners) be afforded a choice among repair of
their dwelling, onsite relocation or offsite re~ocation.
Response: EPA made a change to the Revised PRAP such that the
owners of four of the properties which had been proposed for
repair in the original version of the Revised PRAP would be given
the option of choosing either repair, onsite relocation, or
offsite relocation. .
comment: A request was made .for an extension of the 30-day
public comment period for the Revised PRAP.
Response:
days.
EPA extended the public comment for an additional 30
..'
-------
./
STATE CONCURRENCE LETTER
-------
JUN-27-1994 11:23
FROM DER SE REGION
TO
82155979890
P.12I2
,'&76
'INNSYLVANIA
DEi=;!
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
DEPART~'~T R~lN~R~~L RESOURCES /
555 North Lane
Conshohocken, PA 19428-2233 -
June 27, 1994
Southea8t Regional Office
(610) 832-6212
Mr. Peter H. Kostmayer
Regional Administrator.
U.S. 'EPA - Region III.
841 Chestnut St Building
Philadelphia, PA 19107
Roe: A.ustin Ave NPL Site
~~
r~ '-.;'7-1'1
1- r. J~/(ei>M
- Record of Decision Concurrence
Dear Mr. Kostmayer,
The Record of Decision received by the Department on June
15, 1994 has been reviewed.
The major components of the s~lected remedy include:
*
Removal of contamination and repair of structures at 346
Owen Avenue and 42 and 44 South Union Avenue.
*
Eighteen additional properties will have contaminated
structual components removed or will be completely
dismantled. Tenants will be relocated, owners will
choose repair (if feasible), replacement of structure, .
or permanent relocation.
Following remediation the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
will acqUire title, or make arrangements fo~ transfer of
title to a third party, to those propertie~ in which
owners select permanent relocation.
*
*
Removal and offsite disposal of radiation-contaminated
soils to permitted facilities. Backfilling and
revegetation of remediated properties.
Replacement of storage building at 135 Austin Avenue and
provision of offsite structure or equivalent to replace
the former 133 Austin Avenue.
*
I hereby concur with the EPA's proposed actions, with the.
following conditions:
*
with regard to soil. contamination, the completed final
. .
-------
. -" - - - - - - .... . --I
j"~\o.J1 I Wo'c:.ro:::
:I~ I":~U11..1f'i
,1..1
':='c:.... :,:, ~ .. ='0 ":,u
F'. (J":;
,
Mr. Peter H. Kostmayer
- 2 -
June 27, 1994
,;I'
remedial action must preclude any degradation of ground
water through leaching or other infiltration of
hazardous substances or contaminants addressed by the
R.OD. The Depa;rtment understands that the cleanup
standards for soils contained in the ROD will satisfy
this condition.
*
The Department will be given the opportunity to concur
with decisions related to the Remedial Design and the
Remedial Action to ensure compliance with DER cleanup
ARARs and design specific ARARs.
The Department's design standards are ARARa pursuant to
CERCLA Section 121, 42 a.s.c. S962~, and the Department
maintains the right to enforce those design standards.
.*
*
This concurrence with the selected remedial action is
not intended to provide any assurances pursuant to
CERCLA Section 104(c) (3), 42 U.S.~. 59604(c) (3).
.
Additionally, the Department understands that ground water
contamination has been discovered at the site and that any plan
to address this ground water would be developed in the future.
Thank you for the opportunity to concur with this EPA
Record of Decision. If you have any questions regarding this
matter, please do not hesitate to contact me.
c:c: Mr. Beitler
Mr. Orwan
Mr. Hartzell
Mr. Becker
Mr. Danyliw
Mr. Sheehan
Mr. Ung
Ms. Tremont
Mr. HeS8
File
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
./
,.
-------
II.
*
AUSTIN AVENUE RADIATION
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE *
INDEX OF DOCUMENTS
,.
REMEDIAL ENFORCEMENT PLANNING
1.
2.
Excerpts from "Final Potentially Responsible Party
Search Report/Austin Avenue Radiation Site," 7/~2.
P. 200001-200005.
Letter to Mr. Joseph M. Mince, Mince, Gold & Katcher,
from Mr. Andr~w J. Goldman, U.S. EPA, re: Whether or
not fees for in-house consulting engineers would be
covered by Technical Assistance Grant (TAG) funding,
11/25/92. P. 200006-200015.
'"
Administrative Record File available 6/14/93, updated
6/29/93, 3/2/94, and 6/29/94.
-------
III. REMEDIAL RESPONSE PLANNING
3723 Huev Avenue
/
1.
3723 Huey Avenue Basement and First Floor Plans,
prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc., 7/2/92. P. 300001-
300006. The following are attached:
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
Second & Third Floor Plans;
North & South Cross Sections;
East & West Cross Sections;
North & South Exterior Elevations;
Easo & West Exterior Elevations.
2.
Cost Development Study, 3723 Huey Avenue, 7/24/92.
P. 300007-300021.
3.
Report:- EPA - Lansdowne Proiect. Phase II Soil
Characterization Pro;ect for 3723 Huev Avenue, prepared
by John O. Hamm, 8/10/92. P. 300022-300053.
4.
Memorandum to Mr. Walter Lee, U.S. EPA, from Mr. John.
Hamm, re: Addendum to the Soil Characterization
Report, 8/22/92. P. 300054-300657. The addendum is
attached.
5.
Report: EPA - Lansdowne Proiect. Characterization
Recort for 3723 Huev Avenue, prepared by Darrell J.
Turner, (undated). P. 300058-300139.
42 South Union Avenue
6.
Report: EPA - Lansdowne Proiect. Characterization
Recort for 42 S. Union Avenue, prepared by John O.
Hamm, 6/3/92. P. 300140-300161.
7.
42 South Union Avenue, Basement and First Floor Plans,
prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc., 7/20/92. P. 300162-
300165. The Bar, Garage and Apartment Addition Plan;
North and East Elevations; and South and West
Elevations are attached.
8.
Cost Development Study, 42 S. Union Avenue, 9/4/92.
P. 300166-300181.
9.
Handwritten memorandum to file from Mr. V. Janosik,
U.S. EPA, re: No soil around 42 S. Union Avenue
constituting the reason why no Soil Characterization
Report was compiled, 10/14/92. P. 300182-3001~2.
2
-------
10.
Memorandum to file from Mr. Victor J. Janosik, U.S.
EPA, re: Contamination at 42 S. Union Avenue, 1/6/93.
P. 300183-300183.
500 Haroer Avenue
./
11.
12.
13.
14.
500 Harper Avenue, Basement, First and Second Floor
Plans, prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc., 5/15/92. P.
300184-30018~. The 3rd Floor Plan; North and East
Elevations; and South and West Elevations are attached.
Report: EPA - Lansdowne Pro;ect. Phase II Soil
Characterizatton Recort for 500 Haroer Avenue, prepared
by John O. Hamm, 8/18/92. P. 300188-300222.
Cost Bevelopment Study, 500 Harper Avenue, 8/31/92.
P. 300223-300237.
Report: EPA - Lansdowne Pro;ect. Characterization
Recort for 500 Haroer Avenue, prepared by Darrell J.
Turner, (undated). P. 300238-300302..
151 Lexinaton Avenue
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
151 Lexington Avenue, Basement & 1st Floor Plans,
. prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc., 5/18/92. P. 300303-
300306. The 2nd Floor Plan & Sections; North and South
Elevations; and East and West Elevations are attached.
Cost Development Study, 151 Lexington Avenue, 6/26/92.
P. 300307-300321.
Report: EPA - Lansdowne Pro;ect. Phase II Soil
Characterization Recort for 151 Lexinaton Avenue,
prepared by John O. Hamm, 8/31/92. P. 300322-300373.
Memorandum to Mr. Walter Lee, U.S. EPA, from Mr. John
Hamm, re: Addendum to the Soil Characterization
Report, 9/2/92. P. 300374-300378. The ad~endum is
attached.
Memorandum to Mr. Walter Lee, U.S. EPA, from Mr. John
Hamm, re: Addendum to the Soil Characterization
Report, 9/10/92. P. 300379-300382. The addendum is
attached.
Report: EPA - Lansdowne Pro;ect. Characterization
Recort for 151 Lexinaton Avenue, prepared by Darrell J.
Turner, (undated). P. 300383-300435.
3
-------
L--
6 plumstead Avenue
21.
Report: Draft EPA - Lansdowne Pro;ect.
Characterization Recort for 6 Plumstead
prepared by Darrell J. Turner, 5/7/92.
300476.
Avenue, ./
P. 300436-
22.
6 Plumstead Ave., Basement and Partial Site Plan,
prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc., 6/24/92. P. 300477-
300481. The following are attached:
a)
b)
c)
d)
First
Thi:rld
North
South
and Second Floor Plans;
Floor Plan;
and East Elevations;
and West Elevations.
23.
Cost Development Study, 6 Plumstead Avenue, 7/17/92.
P. 300482-300496.
24.
Report: EPA - Lansdowne Proiect. Phase II Soil
Characterization Recort for 6 E. Plumstead Avenue,
prepared by John O. Hamm, 8/19/92. P. 300497-300538.
10 Plumstead Avenue
..
25.
Report: EPA - Lansdowne Project. Characterization
Recort for 10 Plumstead Avenue, prepared by Darrell J.
Turner, 5/20/92. P. 300539-300609.
26.
10 Plumstead Avenue, Basement and 1st Floor Plans,
prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc., 7/28/92. P. 300610-
300613. The 2nd and 3rd Floor Plans; Basement Sections
and Exterior Elevations; and North and South Exterior
Elevations are attached.
27. Cost Development Study, 10 Plumstead Avenue, 8/7/92.
P. 300614-300628.
28.
Report: EPA - Lansdowne Proiect. Phase II: Soil
Characterization Recort for 10 E. Plumstead Avenue,
prepared by John O. Hamm, 9/1/92. P. 300629-300657.
16 Plumstead Avenue
29.
Report: EPA - Lansdowne Pro;ect. Characterization
. Recort for 16 Plumstead Avenue, prepared by Darrell J.
Turner, 5/12/92. P. 300658-300682.
4
-------
30.
31.
~-- -_.
16 Plumstead Avenue, Basement and First Floor Plans,
prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc., 7/15/92. P. 300683-
300686. The Second and Third Floor Plans; North and
South Elevations; and South and West Elevations are
attached.
Cost Development Study, 16 Plumstead Avenue, 7/24/92.
P. 300687-300703.
Report: EPA - Lansdowne Pro;ect. Phase II Soil
Characterization Reoort for 16 E. Plumstead Avenue,
prepared by John O. Hamm, 8/19/92. P. 300704-300733.
.
237 North Lansdowne Avenue
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
Reoort: Draft EPA - Lansdowne Pro;ect.
Characterization Reoort for 237 N. Lansdowne Avenue,
prepared by Darrell J. Turner, 5/8/92. P. 300734-
300768.
237 N. Lansdowne Ave., Site and Basement Plans,
prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc., 7/9/92. P. 300769-
300775. The following are atta~hed:
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
1st and 2nd Floor Plans;
3rd Floor Plan & Cross Sections;
Exterior Elevation, North;
Exterior Elevation, South;
Exterior Elevation, East;
Exterior Elevation, West;
Cost Development Study, 237 North Lansdowne Avenue,
7/24/92. P. 300776-300792.
Report: EPA - Lansdowne Pro;ect. Phase II Soil
Characterization Reoort for 237 N. Lansdowne Avenue,
prepared by John O. Hamm, 9/11/92. P. 300793-300839.
37.
216 Wayne Avenue
38.
39.
Report: Draft EPA - Lansdowne Pro;ect.
Characterization Reoort for 216 WaYne Avenue, prepared
by Darrell J. Turner, 5/12/92. P. 300840-300893.
Report: EPA - Lansdowne Pro;ect. Phase II Soil
Characterization Reoort for 216 WaYne Avenue, prepared
by John O. Hamm, 7/22/92. P. 300894-300929~
Memorandum to Mr. Walter Lee, U.S. EPA, from Mr. John
Hamm, re: Addendum to the Soil Characterization
Report, 7/23/92. P. 300930-300933. The addendum is
attached.
5
-------
40.
41.
216 Wayne Avenue, Basement and First Floor Plans,
prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc., 7/27/92. P. 300934-
300937. The Second Floor Plan and Plot Plan; North and
East Elevations; and South and West Elevations ar~'
attached.
Cost Development Study, 216 Wayne Avenue, 8/3/92.
P. 300938-300954.
218 Wayne Avenue
42.
43.
44.
45.
218 Wayne Avenue, Basement and First Floor Plans, .
prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc., 6/16/92. P. 300955-
300958. The Second Floor Plan; North & South
Elevations; and East & West Elevations are attached.
Cost Development Study, 218 Wayne Avenue, 7/2/92.
300959-300975.
P.
Report: Draft EPA - Lansdowne proiect. Phase II Soil
Characterization Reoort for 218 Wayne .Avenue, prepared
by John O. Hamm, 7/21/92. P. 300976-301020.
Report: EPA Lansdowne Pro;ect.-Characterization Reoort
for 218 Wayne Avenue, prepared by Darrell J. Turner,-
(undated). P. 301021-301071.
219 Wayne Avenue
46.
47.
48.
49.
Report: Draft EPA - Lansdowne Proiect. .
Characterization Reoort for 219 Wayne Avenue, prepared
by Darrell J. Turner, 5/8/92. P. 301072-301127.
219 Wayne Avenue, Basement and First Floor Plans,
prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc., 7/2/92. P. 301128-
301132. The following are attached:
a)
b)
c)
d)
Second & Third Floor Plans;
North & South Cross Sections;
North & South Exterior Elevations;
East &.West Exterior Elevations.
Cost Development Study, 219 Wayne Avenue, 7/2/92.
P. 301133-301149.
Report: EPA - Lansdowne Pro;ect. Phase II Soil
Characterization Reoort for 219 Wayne Avenue, prepared
by John O. Hamm, 8!-4/92. P. 301150-301190.
6
-------
310 Shadeland Avenue
so.
Report: Draft EPA - Lansdowne Pro;ect. Phase II Soil
Characterization Recort for 310 Shadeland Avenue,
prepared by John O. Hamm, 7/29/92. P. 301191-301215.
51.
310 Shadeland Avenue, Basement and First Floor Plans,
prepared by ~oy F. Weston, Inc., 8/14/92. P. 301216-
301220. The following are attached:
a)
b)
c)
d)
Second and Third Floor Plans;
East and West Elevations;
Exterior Elevation North;
Exterior Elevation South.
52.
Memorandum to Mr. Walter Lee, U.S. EPA, from Mr. John
Hamm, re: Addendum to the Soil Characterization
Report, 9/10/92. P. 301221-301224. The addendum is
attached.
53.
Cost Development Study, 310 Shadeland'Avenue, 10/5/92.
P. 301225-301241.
54.
Report: EPA - Lansdowne Pro;ect Characterization
Recort for 310 Shadeland, prepared by Darrell J.
Turner, (undated). P. 301242-301324.
346 Owen Avenue
55.
346 Owen Avenue, Basement and First Floor Plans,
prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc., 6/16/92. P. 301325-
301328. The Second Floor and Attic Plans; North and
South Elevations; and South and West Elevations are
attached. '
56.
Report: Draft EPA - Lansdowne Pro;ect. Phase II Soil
Characterization Report for 346 Owen Avenue, prepared
, by John O~ Hamm, 7/8/92. P. 301329-301365~
,
57.
Cost Development Study, 346 Owen Avenue, 7/26/92.
P. 301366-301380.
58.
Report: EPA - Lansdowne Pro;ect. Characterization
R~oort for 346 Owen Avenue, prepared by Darrell J.
Turner, (undated). P. 301381-301431.
617. 619. 621 and 623 Pine Street
59.
Report: Draft EPA-Lansdowne Proiect. Phase II Soil
Characterization Re90rt for 617. 619. 621. and 623 Pine'
Street, prepared by John O. Hamm, 7/9/92. P. 301432-
301453.
7
-------
60:
61.
62.
63.
64.
617 Pine Street, Basement, First Floor and Second Floor
IV Plans, prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc., 8/3/92.
P. 301454-301456. the North and East Elevations and
South and West Elevations are attached. /.
619 Pine Street, Basement, First Floor and Second Floor
Plans, prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc., 8/5/92.
P. 301457-301459. The North and East Elevations and
South and West Elevations are attached.
621 Pine Street, Basement, First Floor and Second Floor
Plans, prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc., 8/6/92.
P. 301460-301~62. The North and East Elevations and
South and West Elevations are attached.
Cost ~evelopment Study, 617 Pine Street, 8/7/92.
P. 301463-301477.
623 Pine Street, Basement, First Floor and Second Floor
Plans, prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc., 8/13/92.
P. 301478-301480. The North and East Elevations and
South and West Elevations are attached.
65. Cost Development Study, 619, Piae Street, 8/14/92.
P. 301481-301495. ~
66. Cost Development Study, 621, Pine Street, 8/14/92.
P. 301496-301510.
67. Cost Development Study, 623, Pine Street, 1/21/92.
P. 301511-301525.
68.
Report: EPA - Lansdowne Pro;ect. Characterization
Recort for 617. 619. 621. 623 Pine Street, prepared by
Darrell J. Turner, {undated}. P. 301526-301621.
34 Lewis Avenue
69. . 34 Lewis Avenue, Basement and First Floor Plans,
prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc., 6/19/92. P. 301622-
301625. The Second Floor Plan; North & South
Elevations; and West & East Elevations are attached.
Cost Development Study, 34 Lewis Avenue, 7/2/92.
P. 301626-301640.
70.
71.
Report: EPA - Lansdowne Pro;ect. Phase II Soil
Characterization Reoort for 34 Lewis Avenue, prepared
by John O. Hamm, 9/10/92. P. 301641-301698.
8
-------
72.
73.
Memorandum to Mr. Walter Lee, U.S. EPA, from Mr. John
Hamm, re: Addendum to the Soil Characterization
Report, 9/11/92. P. 301699-301707. The addendum is
attached. /,
Report: EPA - Lansdowne Pro;ect. Characterization
Reoort for 34 Lewis Avenue, prepared by Darrell J.
Turner, (undated). P. 301708-301744. .
64 South Clifton Avenue
74.
75.
76..
77.
78.
79.
64 South Clifton Avenue, Basement Plan and Elevations,
prepared by Ray F. Weston, Inc., 5/4/92. P. 301745-
301746. The Wall Elevations are attached.
Memorandum to Mr. Walter Lee,
S. Turkel, U.S. Department of
the house at 64 South Clifton
P. 301747-301747.
U.S. EPA, from Mr. James
the Army, re: Value of
Avenue, 6/11/92.
Cost Development Study, 64 South Clifton Avenue,
7/9/92. P. 301748-301764.
Report: Draft EPA - Lansdowne Pro;ect. Phase II Soil
Characterization Reoort for 64 S. Clifton Avenue,
prepared by John O. Hamm, 7/15/92. P. 301765-301794.
Memorandum to Mr. Walter Lee, U.S. EPA, from Mr. John
Hamm, re: Addendum to the Soil Characterization
Report, 9/11/92. P. 301795-301799. The add~ndum is
attached. .
Report: EPA-Lansdowne Pro;ect. Characterization
Reoort for 64 South Clifton Avenue, prepared by Darrell.
J. Turner, (undated). P. 301800-301842.
211 Penn Boulevard
80.
81.
82.
211 Penn Boulevard, 1st & 2nd Floor Plans,; prepared by
Roy F. Weston, Inc., 5/4/92. P. 301843-301845. The
2nd Fl. Plan & Sections and Exterior Elevations are
attached.
Cost Development Study, 211 Penn Boulevard, 6/12/92.
P. 301846-301860.
Report: EPA-Lansdowne Pro;ect. Phase II Soil
Characterization Reoort for 211 Penn Boulevard,
prepared by John O. Hamm, 8/4/92. P. 301861-301900.
9
-------
83 -.
Report: EPA-Lansdowne Pro;ect. Characterization ReDort
for 211 Penn Boulevard, prepared by Darrell J. Turner,
(undated). P. 301901-301942.
Additional Information
/.,
84.
85.
86.
87~
88.
89.
90.
91.
Memorandum to Mr. Walter Graham, U.S. EPA. from Mr.
Victor J. Janosik, U.S. EPA, re: Soil cleanup
criteria, 1~/8/89. P. 301943-301944.
EPA Lansdowne Project, Lansdowne, Pennsylvania,
Property Descriptions, prepared by Mr. William
Belanger, U.S, EPA, 1/7/92. P. 301945-301951.
Public endangerment summary entitled "Inhalation Limit
for Radium Tailings at the Austin Avenue Radiation Site
to Achieve 100 MREM Annual Dose to Members of the
General Population," prepared.by Mr. Bill Belanger,
5/13/92. P. 301952-301957.
Memorandum to Mr. Walter Lee, U.S EPA, from Mr. G.R.
Boggs, re: Value estimates for properties at the site,
7/2/92. P. 301958-301959. A table of land and .
structure values and total relocation costs for
properties at the site is attached.
Report: EPA-Lansdowne Pro;ect. Phase II Soil
Characterization. Backaround Determination for
Lansdowne and Vicinity, prepared by John O. Hamm,
6/19/92. P. 301960-301983.
Memorandum to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms.
Felicia F. Dailey, Agency for Toxic Substances and
Disease Registry, (ATSDR), re: A professional health
education presentation entitled "Health Effects of Lo~-
Level Radiation," 9/28/92. P. 301984-302024. The
manual given to each participant of the presentation is
attached. .
Memorandum to Mr. Abe Ferdas, U.S. EPA, from Mr.
Lee, U.S. EPA, re: Recommendations for future
treatment of the properties comprising the site,
10/6/92. P. 302025-302031. .
Walter
Letter to Ms. Donna McCartney, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Clyde
H. Sellers, U.S. Department of the Army, re: Property
value information, 10/9/92. P. 302032-302081. The
following are atta~hed:
10
-------
92.
93.
94.
95.
96.
a)
a memorandum regarding transmittal of the
real estate planning report and the estimated
fee value for properties at the site, d~ted
September 9, 1992; .
a memorandum regarding submittal of the Real
Estate Planning Report for review and
approval, dated June 2, 1992;
b)
c)
a report entitled "Real Estate Planning
Report, Austin Avenue Radiation Site,
Lansdowne Borough, East Lansdowne Borough,
Upp~r Darby Township, Aldan Borough, and
Darby Borough, Delaware County,
Pennsylvania;"
. d)
a memorandum regarding the fee and easement
estate wording to be used in determining fee
acquisition, dated September 28, 1992;
the wording for fee estates and easement
estates;
e)
f)
an excerpt from the Gross Appraisal which
includes the estimate of each property and.
separates the value of the land and
improvements.
Handwritten memorandum to file from Mr. Vie Janosik,
u.S. EPA, re: Radionucleides of concern, 10/21/92.
P. 302082-302083. .
Letter to Mr. Donald Becker, PADER, from Mr. Victor J.
Janosik, u.s. EPA, re: Possible property acquisitions,
11/2/92. P. 302084-302084. .
Memorandum to Mr. Vic Janosik, u.s. EPA, from Ms. Dawn
A. Ioven, U.S. EPA, re: Quantitative risk assessment,
11/5/92. P. 302085-302088. Table 1, Average Radon
Levels and Gamma-Radiation Doses, and Table 2, Elevated
Carcinogenic Ris~s Related to Exposure, are attached.
Letter to Mr. Kevin Hess, Pennsylvania Department of
Environmental Resources (PADER), from Mr. Victor J.
Janosik, u.s. EPA, re: Request for Applicable or
Relevant and Appropriate Requirements (ARARs) for the
site, 12/11/92. P. 302089-302089.
Letter to Mr. Kevin Hess, PADER, from Mr. Victor J.
Janosik, u.s. EPA, re: Request for review and comments-
on the draft Proposed Plan, 1/13/93. P. 302090-302090.
11
-------
97:
Letter to Mr. Victor Janosik, u.s. EPA, from Mr. Kevin
J. Hess, PADER, re: Receipt of the draft Proposed Plan
and transmittal of the state ARARs for the site,
1/21/93. P. 302091-302113. The fOllowing. are
attached:
./
a}
potential state ARAR's;
b}
Attachment 1, Chemical-Specific Requirements;
Attachment 2, Location-Specific Requirements;
c}
d)
Attachment 3, Action-Specific Requirements;
a list of Facilities Approved for the
Disposal of Asbestos Containing Waste.
e}
98.
Letter to Mr. Victor Janosik, u.S. EPA, from Mr. Kevin
J. Hess, PADER, re: Comments on the draft Proposed
Plan, 2/12/93. P. 302114-302115.
99.
Table, Radiochemistry Results, 2/17/93.
302116.
P. 302116-
100. Memorandum to Mr. Anthony Dappalone, U.S. EPA, from Mr.,
Victor J. Janosik, u.S. EPA, re: Soils contaminated
with uranium, 2/24/93. P. 302117-302117.
101. Lansdowne Underground Uranium Analysis, prepared by Mr.
William Belanger, U.S..EPA, 2/26/93. P.302118-302127.
102. Sampling location map, 2/26/93.
Sampling results are attached.
103. Memorandum to Dr. Walter Lee, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Nathan
Glen Adams, Roy F. Weston, Inc., re: Transmittal ot
general description, contamination extent, zoning
compliance, and reconstruction cost information, .
3/19/93. P. 302133-302190. The above information for
the following properties are .attached:
P. 302128-302132.
a) 216 Wayne Avenue;
b) 218 Wayne Avenue;
c) 219 Wayne Avenue;
d} 237 North Lansdowne Avenue;
e} 6 Plumstead Avenue;
f} 10 Plumstead Avenue;
12
-------
m)
n)
0)
p)
q)
r)
s)
t)
u)
g)
h)
16 Plumstead Avenue;
42 South Union Avenue;
/
i)
500 Harper Avenue;
j )
k)
346 Owen Avenue;
3!0 Shadeland Avenue;
1)
3723 Huey Avenue;
64 South Clifton Avenue;
34 Lewis Avenue;
211 Penn Boulevard;
151 Lexington Avenue;
617 and 619 Pine Street;
621 and 623 Pine Street;
a Summary of initial Replacement
Reconstruction and Duplicate Reconstruction
Cost(s) ;
review comments on the supporting data and
project requirements;
a Cost Development Study for all properties.
104. Memorandum to Mr. Vic Janosik, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Dawn
A. Ioven, U.S. EPA, re: Risk-based radium 226 levels,.
4/16/93. P. 302191-302203. The following are attached:
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
Background Soil Sampling Results;
.
Determination of Average Background 226Ra Soil
Concentration;
Radiological Characterizations for Parks in
the Lansdowne Area;
a memorandum regarding risk-based radon
levels, dated March 22, 1993;
a memorandum regarding risk-based radium 226
levels, dated April 14, 1993;
13
-------
f}
a memorandum regarding indoor radon levels,
dated March 18, 1993;
Table 1, Elevated Carcinogenic Risks Refated
to Theoretical Inhalation Exposure. .
g}
105. Letter to Mr. Kevin J. Hess, PADER, from Victor J.
Janosik, u.s. EPA, re: Responses to PADER's comments
on the draft- Proposed Plan, 4/20/93. P. 302204-302208.
A letter dated February 12, 1993 regarding PADER's
comments on the draft Proposed Plan is attached.
106. Memorandum to.file from Mr. Victor J. Janosik, u.s.
EPA, re: Radiation contaminated soil at the former
W.L. Cummings Chemical Company, 4/20/93. P. 302209-
302209.
107. Memorandum to file from Mr. Victor J. Janosik, u.s.
EPA, re: Costs for the disposal of contaminated soil,
4/21/93. P. 302210-302210.
108. Memorandum to file from Mr. Victor J. Janosik, u.s.
EPA, re: Clean up of soils, 4/26/93. P. 302211-
302216. -
..
109~ Letter to Mr. Victor J. Janosik, u.s. EPA, from Mr.
Kevin J. Hess, PADER, re: Comments and questions on
the revised draft Proposed Plan, 5/4/93. P. 302217-
302217.
110. Table, Decay Chain of Uranium to Lead, prepared by Dr.
Bruce Molholt, {undated}. P. 302218-302218.
111. Letter to Mr. Kevin J. Hess, PADER, from Mr. Victor J.
Janosik, u.s. EPA, re: Review of the second draft of .
the Proposed Plan, 6/10/93. P. 202219-302219.
112. Memorandum to file from Mr. Victor J. Janosik, u.s.
EPA, re: Summary of a May 12, 1993 meeting to discuss
cleanup levels for radium 226 in soils, 6/21/93.
P. 302220-302220.
113. Letter to Mr. Keviri Hess, PADER, from Mr. Victor J.
Janosik, u.s. EPA, re: The final Proposed Plan,
6/23/93. P. 302221-302221.
114. Proposed Remedial Action Plan, Austin Avenue Radiation
Site, Lansdowne Borough, Aldan Borough, East Lansdowne
Borough, Darby Borough, and Upper Darby Township,
Delaware County, Pennsylvania, {undated}. P. 302222-
302243.
14
-------
115. Memorandum to Mr. Victor J. Janosik, U.S. EPA, from Mr.
John Sykes, III, Austin Avenue Radiation Site Health &
Safety/Radiation Safety Office, re: Results of off-
site sample cores taken to detect potential off-site
migration of radioactive material, 6/23/93. P. 302244-
302247. Sample results are attached. .
116. Memorandum to file from Mr. Victor J. Janosik, U.s.
EPA, re: Summary of a June 28, 1993 meeting with the
owners of affected properties, 7/6/93. P. 302248-
302248.
117. List of properties affected by the site with a cost
estimate assessment for remedial action, 7/19/93.
P. 302249-302249.
118. Memorandum to Mr. Vic Janosik, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Bill
Bellanqer. U.S. EPA, re: Background information on
soil radium activity, 7/21/93. P. 302250-302253. Two
tables showing soil activity are attached.
119. Memorandum to file from Mr. Victor J. Janosik, U.S.
EPA, re: Summary of a trip to the Montclair/Glenridge
Radiation Site near Newark, New'Jersey to compare
remedial action work at that site with the Austin
Avenue Radiation Site, 8/19/93. P. 302254-302255.
120. Letter to Mr. Michael Pfarr, U.s. Army Corps of
Engineers, from Mr. Gregory Daloisio, Roy F. Weston,
Inc., re: The revised Rehabilitation Evaluation,
9/3/93. P. 302256-302314. The evaluation is attached.
121. Memorandum to Mr. Anthony Dappolone, u.S. EPA, from Mr.
Victor J. Janosik, U.S. EPA, re: Reevaluation of the
"repair" alternative for affected properties, 9/17/93.'
P. 302315-302317.
122. Memorandum to file from Mr. Victor J. Janosik, u.S.
. EPA, re: Summary of a September 9, 1993 meeting with
owners of affected properties, 9/28/93. P. 302318- .
302319.
123. .Memorandum to file from Mr. Victor J. Janosik, u.S.
EPA, re: Status of the NPL listing of several site
properties, 9/29/93. P. 302320-302321.
15
-------
124. Memorandum to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Mr.
EI~iott P. Laws, U.S. EPA, re: ,Request for policy
gu1dance for the proposed remed1al action at the site,
12/17/93. P. 302322-302327. A memorandum dated /,
December 16, 1993 regarding the legal authority to
replace demolished buildings at Superfund sites is
attached.
125. Memorandum to Mr. Anthony Dappolone, U.S. EPA, from Mr.
Victor Janosik, U.S. EPA, re: Zoning ordnances within
Lansdowne Borough, 1/4/94. P. 302328-302328.
126. Letter to Mr. ~evin Hess, PADER, from Mr. Victor J.
Janosik, U.S. EPA, re: Review of the draft Proposed
Plan, 1/21/94. P. 302329-302329.
127. Report: Technical Scecifications for the
Dismantlement. Excavation. Remediation. and Restoration
of Procerties at the Austin Avenue Radiation Site.
Delaware County. Pennsylvania. Volume 1. General
Reauirements, prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc., 2/94.
P. 302330-302613.
128. Report: Technical Scecifications for the
. Dismantlement. Excavation. Remediation. and Restoration~
of procerties at the Austin Avenue Radiation Site.
Delaware County. Pennsylvania. Volume 2. Divisions 2
Throuah 16, prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc., 2/94.
P. 302614-303005. '
129. Drawings Report: Austin Avenue Radiation Site.'
Delaware County. Pennsylvania, prepared by U.S. EPA,
PADER, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and Roy F. Weston,
Inc., 2/94. P. 303006-303140.
130. Ordnance No. 1049, Lansdowne Zoning Ordnance of 1985,
Borough of Lansdowne, Delaware County, Pennsylvania,
(undated). P. 303141-303222.
.
131~ Letter to Mr. Victor Janosik, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Kevin
J. Hess, PADER, re: Comments to the Draft Revised
Proposed Plan, 1/26/94. P. 303223-303224.
132. U.S. EPA Superfund Program Fact Sheet, Revised Proposed
Remedial Action Plan, Austin Avenue Radiation Superfund
Site, (undated). P. 303225-303249.
133. Letter to Mr. Kevin Hess, PADER, from Mr. Victor J.
Janosik, U.S. EPA, re: Transmittal letter for the
revised Proposed R~medial Action Plan and request for
review, 1/21/94. P. 303250-303250.
16
-------
i-
,
. .
134. Letter to Mr. Kevin Hess, PADER, from Mr. Victor J.
Janosik, u.s. EPA, re: Transmittal letter for the
revised Proposed Remedial Action Plan and request for
review and notification of the public comment per~od,
2/24/94. P. 303251-303251.
135. Letter to Mr. Kevin Hess, PADER, from Mr. Victor J.
Janosik, u.s. EPA, re: Notification of the meetings
with the pualic and the issues to be discussed,
2/24/94. P. 303252-303252.
136. Memorandum to Mr. Anthony Dappolone, u.s. EPA, from Mr.
Victor Janosi~, u.s. EPA, re: Information on the
Austin Avenue meetings, 3/2/94. P. 303253-303253.
137. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from 6 East
Plumstead Avenue, re: Request for an extension to the
comment period, 3/3/94. P. 303254-303254.
. 138. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, u.s. EPA, from 10 East
Plumstead Avenue, re: Disapproval of.change in the
Proposed Remedial Action Plan to the homeowner's house,
3/7/94. P. 303255-303256.
139. Letter to Mayor Jack Edmonson, Aldan Borough Municipal ~
. Building, from Mr. Victor J. Janosik, u.s. EPA, re:
Clarification of the alternatives for onsite
replacement of the structures and offsite relocation,
3/8/94. P. 303257-303257.
140. Letter to Mayor Robert Dimond, East Lansdowne Borough
Hall, from Mr. Victor J. Janosik, U.s. EPA, re:
Clarification of the alternatives for onsite
replacement of the structures and offsite.relocation,
3/8/94. P. 303258-303258.
141. Letter to Mayor Daniel Devlin, Darby Borough Building,
from Mr. Victor J. Janosik, U.S. EPA, re:
Clarification of the alternatives for onsite
replacement of the structures and offsite relocation,
3/8/94. P. 303259-303259. .
142. Letter to Mr. John E. Clark, Upper Darby Township
Council, from Mr. Victor J. Janosik, u.s. EPA, re:
Clarification of the alternatives for onsite
replacement of the structures and offsite relocation,
3/8/94. P. 303260-303260.
17
-------
143. Letter to Mr. George Bochanski, Lansdowne Borough
Council, from Mr. Victor J. Janosik, U.S. EPA, re:
Clarification of the alternatives for onsite
replacement of the structures and offsite relocatIon,
3/8/94. P. 303261-303261.
144. Letter to Mr. George Bobnak, East Lansdowne Borough
Council, from Mr. Victor J. Janosik, u.s. EPA, re:
Clarification of the alternatives for onsite
replacement of the structures and offsite relocation,
3/8/94. P. 303262-303262.
145. Letter to Mr. fJohn D. Bellopede, Aldan Borough Council,
from Mr. Victor J. Janosik, U.s. EPA, re:
Clarification of the alternatives for onsite
replacement of the structures and offsite relocation,
3/8/94. P. 303263-303263.
146. Letter to Mr. George Danyliw, PADER, from Mr. Victor J.
Janosik, u.s. EPA, re: Clarification of the
alternatives for onsite replacement of the structures
and offsite relocation, 3/8/94. P. 303264-303264.
147. Letter to The Honorable Nicholas A. Micozzie, State.
Representative, from Mr. Victor J. Janosik, u.s. EPA;
re: Clarification of the alternatives for onsite
replacement of the structures and offsite relocation,
3/8/94. P. 303265-303265.
...
148. Letter to The Honorable Joseph Loeper, State Senator,
from Mr. Victor J. Janosik, u.S. EPA, re:
Clarification of the alternatives for onsite
replacement of the structures and offsite relocation,
3/8/94. P. 303266-303266.
149. Letter to The Honorable Mario J. Civera, Jr., State
Representative, from Mr. Victor J. Janosik,. u.S. EPA,
re: Clarification of the alternatives for onsite
replacement of the structures and offsite relocation,
3/8/94. P. 303267-303267.
150. Letter to Mr. Wilbur Smith, Darby Borough Council, from
Mr. Victor J. Janosik, U.S. EPA, re: Clarification of
the alternatives for onsite replacement of the
structures and offsite relocation, 3/8/94. P. 303268-
303268.
151. Letter to Mayor John J. Rankin, Jr., Lansdowne Borough
Hall, from Mr. Victor J. Janosik, U.S. EPA, re:
Clarification of the alternatives for onsite
replacement of the structures and offsite relocation,
3/8/94. P. 303269-303269.
18
-------
152. Let~e7 to Maror,Margaret Murdo~h, Upper Darby Township
Mun~c~pal Bu~ld~ng, from Mr. V~ctor J. Janosik, U.s.
EPA, re: Clarification of the alternatives for oqsite
replacement of the structures and offsite relocation,
3/8/94. P. 303270-303270.
153. Letter to 151 Lexington
Janosik, U.s. EPA, re:
alternatives for onsite
and offsite relocation,
Avenue, from Mr. Victor J.
Clarification of the
replacement of the structures
3/8/94. P. 303271-303271.
154. Letter to 136 Owen Avenue, from Mr. Victor J. Janosik,
U.s. EPA, re: f Clarification of the alternatives for
onsite replacement of the structures and offsite
relocation, 3/8/94. P. 303272-303272.
155. Letter to 6740 Baltimore Pike, from Mr. Victor J.
Janosik, u.s. EPA, re: Clarification of the
alternatives for onsite replacement of the structures
and offsite relocation, 3/8/94. P. 303273-303273~
156. Letter to 3726 Rosemont
Janosik, u.s. EPA, re:
alternatives for onsite
and offsite relocation,
Avenue, from Mr. Victor J.
Clarification of the
replacement of the structures
3/8/94. P. 303274-303274. -
157. Letter to 10 East Plumstead Avenue, from Mr. Victor J.
Janosik, u.s. EPA, re: Clarification of the
alternatives for onsite replacement of the structures
and offsite relocation, 3/8/94. P. 303275-303275.
158. Letter to 534 San Diego
Janosik, u.s. EPA, re:
alternatives for onsite
and offsite relocation,
Avenue, from Mr. Victor J.
Clarification of the
replacement of the structures
3/8/94. P. 303276-303276.
159. Letter to 6 East Plumstead Avenue, from Mr. Victor J.
. . Janosik, u.s. EPA, re: Clarification of the
alternatives for onsite replacement of the;structures
and offsite relocation, 3/8/94. P. 303277-303277.
160. Letter to 151 Lexington Avenue, from Mr. Victor J.
Janosik, u.s. EPA, re: Clarification of the
alternatives for onsite replacement of the structures
and offsite relocation, 3/8/94. P. 303278-303278.
161. Letter to 623 Pine Street, from Mr. Victor J. Janosik,
u.s. EPA, re: Clarification of the alternatives for
onsite replacement of the structures and offsite
relocation, 3/8/94. P. 303279-303279.
19
-------
162. Letter to 1264 Country Club Drive, from Mr. Victor J.
Janosik, U.S. EPA, re: Clarification of the
alternatives for onsite replacement of the structures
and offsite relocation, 3/8/94. P. 303280-303280.
163. Letter to 216 Haddon Avenue, from Mr. Victor"J.
Janosik, U.S. EPA, re: Clarification of the
alternativee for onsite replacement of the structures
and offsite relocation, 3/8/94. P. 303281-303281.
164. Letter to 911 Greenbriar Road, from Mr. Victor J.
Janosik, U.S. EPA, re: Clarification of the
alternatives lor onsite replacement of the structures
and offsite relocation, 3/8/94. P. 303282-303282.
165. Letter to 310 Shadeland
Janosik, U.S. EPA, re:
alternatives for onsite
and offsite relocation,
Avenue, from Mr. Victor J.
Clarification of the
replacement of the structures
3/8/94. P. 303283-303283.
166. Letter to 16 East Plumstead Avenue, from Mr. Victor J.
Janosik, U.S. EPA, re: Clarification of the :
alternatives for onsite replacement of the structures-
and offsite relocation, 3/8/94. P. 303284-303284.
~
1670. Letter to 211 Penn Boulevard, from Mr. Victor J.
Janosik, U.S. EPA, re: Clarification of the
alternatives for onsite replacement of the structures
and offsite relocation, 3/8/94. P. 303285-303285.
168. Letter to 140 Hilldale Road, from Mr. Victor J.
Janosik, U.S. EPA, re: Clarification of the
alternatives for onsite replacement of the structures
and offsite relocation, 3/8/94. P. 303286-303286.
169. Letter to 219 Wayne Avenue, from Mr. Victor J. Janosik,
U.S. EPA, re: Clarification of the alternatives for
o onsite replacement of the structures and otfsite
relocation, 3/8/94. P. 303287-303287. .
170. Letter to 237 North Lansdowne Avenue, from Mr. Victor
J. Janosik, U.S. EPA, re: Clarification of the
alternatives for onsite replacement of the structures
and offsite relocation, 3/8/94. P. 303288-303288.
171. Letter to 215 Ridley Avenue, from Mr. Victor J.
Janosik, U.S. EPA, re: Clarification of the
alternatives for ortsite replacement of the structures
and offsite relocation, 3/8/94. P. 303289-303289.
20
-------
172. Letter to 64 South Clifton Avenue, from Mr. Victor J.
Janosik, u.S. EPA, re: Clarification of the
alternatives for onsite replacement of the struct~~es
and offsite relocation, 3/8/94. P. 303290-303290.
173. Letter to 621 Pine Street, from Mr. Victor J. Janosik,
u.S. EPA, re: Clarification of the alternatives for
onsite replacement of the structures and offsite
relocation, 3/8/94. P. 303291-303291.
174. Letter to 64 South Union Street, from Mr. Victor J.
Janosik, U.S..EPA, re: Clarification of the
alternatives for onsite replacement of the structures
and offsite relocation, 3/8/94. P. 303292-303292.
175. Letter to 3723 Huey Avenue, from Mr. Victor J. Janosik,
u.S. EPA, re: Clarification of the alternatives for
onsite replacement of the structures and offsite
relocation, 3/8/94. P. 303293-303293.
176. Letter to 201 Buck Road, from Mr. Victor J. Janosik,
u.S. EPA, re: Clarification of the alternatives for
onsite replacement of the struatures and offsite
relocation, 3/8/94. P. 303294-303294.
177. Letter to Mr. Stanley L. Laskowski, u.s. EPA, from 151
Lexington Avenue, re: Comments on the meeting with EPA
concerning the Revised Proposed Remedial Actin Plan,
3/10/94. P. 303295-303299.
178. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Matthew
Schultz, Greater Lansdowne Civic Association, re:
Comments on the decision to rebuild the radium
contaminated homes in eastern Delaware County, 3/13/94..
P. 303300-303300.
179. Information on assessments, submitted by Richard J.
Daisley, 3/15/94. P. 303301-303301.
t.
180. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mayor John
J. Rankin, Jr., re: Comments on the Revised Proposed
Remedial Action Plan, 3/15/94. P. 303302-303303.
181. Handwritten letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from
211 Penn Boulevard, re: Preferred remedy for cleanup,
3/16/94. P. 303304-303304. .
182. Memorandum to file 'from Mr. Victor J. Janosik, u.s.
EPA, re: Public meeting on the Revised Proposed
Remedial Action Plan, 3/16/94. P. 303305-303305.
21
-------
183. Letter to 3723 Huey Avenue, from Mr. Victor J. Janosik,
u.s. EPA, re: Modification to the Revised Proposed
Remedial Action Plan, 3/23/94. P. 303306-303307./,
184. Letter to 64 South Union Street, from Mr. Victor J.
Janosik, U.s. EPA, re: Modification to the Revised
Proposed Remedial Action Plan, 3/23/94. P. 303308-
303309.
185. Letter to 6740 Baltimore Pike, from Mr.
. Janosik, U.s. EPA, re: Modification to
Proposed Reme~ial Action Plan, 3/23/94.
303311.
Victor J.
the Revised
P. 303310-
186. Letter to 3726 Rosemont Avenue, from Mr. Victor J.
Janosik, U.S. EPA, re: Modification to the Revised
Propose~ Remedial Action Plan, 3/23/94. P. 303312-
303313.
187. Letter to 10 East Plumstead Avenue, from Mr. Victor J.
Janosik, U.s. EPA, re: Modification to the Revised
Proposed Remedial Action Plan, 3/23/94. P. 303314-
303315.
188. Letter to 534 San Diego Avenue, from Mr. Victor J.
. Janosik, U.s. EPA, re: Modification to the Revised
Proposed Remedial Action Plan, 3/23/94. P. 303316-
303317.
189. Letter to 6 East Plumstead Avenue, from Mr.
Janosik, u.S. EPA, re: Modification to the
Proposed Remedial Action Plan, 3/23/94. P.
303319.
Victor J.
Revised
303318-
190. Letter to 151 Lexington Avenue, from Mr. Victor J. .
Janosik, u.S. EPA, re: Modification to the Revised
Proposed Remedial Action Plan, 3/23/94. P. 303320-
303321. .
"
191. Letter to 201 Buck Road, from Mr. Victor J. Janosik,
u.s. EPA, re: Modification to the Revised Proposed
Remedial Action Plan, 3/23/94. P. 303322-303323.
192. Letter to 216 Haddon Avenue, from Mr. Victor J.
Janosik, u.s. EPA, re: Modification to the Revised
Proposed Remedial Action Plan, 3/23/94. P. 303324-
303325.
193. Letter to 911 Greenbriar Road, from Mr. Victor 'J.
Janosik, u.S. EPA, re: Modification to the Revised
Proposed Remedial Action Plan, 3/23/94. P. 303326-
303327.
22
-------
.
194. Letter to 310 Shadeland Avenue, from Mr. Victor J.
Janosik, U.S. EPA, re: Modification to the Revised
Proposed Remedial Action Plan, 3/23/94. P. 303328~
303329. -
195. Letter to 16 East Plumstead Avenue, from Mr. Victor J.
Janosik, U.S. EPA, re: Modification to the Revised
Proposed Remedial Action Plan, 3/23/94. P. 303330-
303331. .
196. Letter to 211 Penn Boulevard, from Mr. Victor J.
Janosik, U.S. EPA, re: Modification to the Revised
Proposed Remedial Action Plan, 3/23/94. P. 303332-
303333.
197. Letter to 140 Hilldale Road, from Mr. Victor J.
Janosik, U.S. EPA, re: Modification to the Revised
Proposed Remedial Action Plan, 3/23/94. P. 303334-
303335.
198. Letter to 219 Wayne Avenue, from Mr. Victor J. Janosik,
U.S. EPA, re: Modification to the Revised Proposed
Remedial Action Plan, 3/23/94. P. 303336-303337.
199. Letter to 237 North Lansdowne Avenue, from Mr. Victor
J. Janosik, U.S. EPA, re: Modification to the Revised
Proposed Remedial Action Plan, 3/23/94. P. 303338-
303339.
200. Letter to 621. Pine Street, from Mr. Victor J. Janosik,
U.S. EPA, re: Modification to the Revised Proposed
Remedial Action Plan, 3/23/94. P. 303340-303341.
201. Letter to 64 South Clifton Avenue, from Mr.
Janosik, u.S. EPA, re: Modification to the
Proposed Remedial Action Plan, 3/23/94. P.
303343.
Victor J.
Revised
303342-
202. Letter to 215 Ridley Avenue, from Mr. Victor J.
Janosik, u.s. EPA, re: Modification to the Revised
Proposed Remedial Action Plan, 3/23/94. P. 303342-
303345.
203. Letter to 1264 Country Club Drive, from
Janosik, u.S. EPA, re: Modification to
Proposed Remedial Action Plan, 3/23/94.
303347.
Mr. Victor J.
the Revised
P. 303346-
204. Letter to 623 Pine Street, from Mr. Victor J. Janosik,
U.S. EPA, re: Modification to the Revised Proposed
Remedial Action Plan, 3/23/94. P. 303348-303349.
23
-------
205. Letter to 136 Owen Avenue, from Mr. Victor J. Janosik
U.S. EPA, re: Modification to the Revised proposed'
Remedial Action Plan, 3/23/94. P. 303350-303351./,
206. Letter to 151 Lexington Avenue, from Mr. Victor J.
Janosik, U.S. EPA, re: Modification to the Revised
Proposed Remedial Action Plan, 3/23/94. P. 303352-
303353.
207. Letter to The Honorable Nicholas A. Micozzie, State
Representative, from Mr. Victor J. Janosik, U.S. EPA,
re: Modifica~ion to the Revised Proposed Remedial
Action Plan, 3/23/94. P. 303354-303355.
208. Letter to The Honorable Joseph Loeper from Mr. Victor
J. Janosik, U.S. EPA, re: Modification to the Revised
Proposed Remedial Action Plan, 3/23/94. P. 303356-
303357.
209. Letter to The Honorable Mario J.
Victor J. Janosik, U.S. EPA, re:
Revised Proposed Remedial Action
P. 303358-303359.
Civera, Jr. from Mr.
Modification to the
Plan, 3/23/94.
210. Letter to Mr. George Danyliw, PADER, from Mr. Victor J.~
- Janosik, U.S. EPA, re: Modification to the Revised
Proposed Remedial Action Plan, 3/23/94. P. 303360-
303361.
211. Letter to Mr. Wilbur Smith, Darby Borough Council, from
Mr. Victor J. Janosik, U.S. EPA, re: Modification to
the Revised Proposed Remedial Action Plan, 3/23/94.
P. 303362-303363.
212. Letter to Mr. John J. Rankin, Lansdowne Borough Hall,
from Mr. Victor J. Janosik, U.S. EPA, re: Modification
to the Revised Proposed Remedial Action Plan, 3/23/94.
P. 303364-303365.
213. Letter to Mayor Margaret Murdoch, Upper Darby Township
Municipal Building, from Mr. Victor J. Janosik, U.S.
EPA, re: Modification to the Revised Proposed Remedial
Action Plan, 3/23/94. P. 303366-303367.
214 '0
Letter to Mayor Jack Edmonson, Aldan Borough Municipal
Building, from Mr. Victor J. Janosik, U.S. EPA, re:
Modification to the Revised Proposed Remedial Action
Plan, 3/23/94. P. "303368-303369.
24
-------
215. Letter to Mayor Robert Dimond, East Lansdowne Borough
Hall, from Mr. Victor J. Janosik, U.S. EPA, re:
Modification to the Revised Proposed Remedial Act~n
Plan, 3/23/94. P. 303370-303371.
216. Letter to Mayor Daniel Devlin, Darby Borough Building,
from Mr. Victor J. Janosik, U.S. EPA, re: Modification
to the Revised Proposed Remedial Action Plan, 3/23/94.
P. 303372-303373.
217. Letter to Mr. John E. Clark, Upper Darby Township
Council, from~r. Victor J. Janosik, U.S. EPA, re:
Modification to the Revised Proposed Remedial Action
Plan, 3/23/94. P. 303374-303375.
218. Letter to Mr. George Bochanski, Lansdowne Borough
Council, from Mr. Victor J. Janosik, U.S. EPA, re:
M?dific~ti~n to the Revised Proposed Remedial Action
.I:'.J.an, j/-;'3/~4. i". jUjj'/b-jU3377.
219. Letter to Mr. George Bobnak, East Lansdowne Borough
Council, from Mr. Victor J. Janosik, U.S. EPA, re:
Modification to the Revised Proposed Remedial Action
Plan, 3/23/94. P. 303378-303379.
220. Letter to Mr. John D. Bellopede,
from Mr. Victor J. Janosik, U.S.
to the Revised Proposed Remedial
P. 303380-303381.
Aldan Borough Council,
EPA, re: Modification
Action Plan, 3/23/94.
221. Letter to Mr. Peter Kostmayer, U.S. EPA, from 623 Pine
Street, re: Request for property to be placed on the
top of the list for preference to relocate, 3/25/94.
P. 303382-303382. .
222. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from 214 WaYne
Avenue, re: Concerns of property owners living
adjacent to the condemned sites, 4/24/94. ,Po 303383-
303383. .
223. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from
P. Frank, Reed, Smith, Shaw, & McClay, re:
the Revised Proposed Remedial Action Plan,
P. 303384-303394.
Mr. Robert
Comments on
4/29/94.
224. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Michael
F.X. ColI, re: Comments on the Revised Proposed
Remedial Action Plan, 4/29/94. P. 303395-303398.
25
-------
. - ....-' --.-- -- - -
225. Letter to Mr. Kevin Hess, PADER, from Mr. Victor J.
Janosik, U.S. EPA, re: Transmittal letter for the
draft Record of Decision and request for its revi~w and
comments, 5/12/94. P. 303399-303399.
226. Letter to Mr. Kevin Hess, PADER, from Mr. Victor J.
Janosik, U.S. EPA, re: Transmittal letter for the
draft Respon~iveness summary and request for its review
and comments, 5/25/94. P. 303400-303400.
227. Letter to Mr. Victor Janosik, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Kevin
J. Hess, PADER, re: Review of the draft Record of
Decision, 5/21/94. P. 303401-303402.
228. Memorandum to Austin Group from Ms. Lorie Baker, U.S.
EPA, re: Final NPL listing, 6/8/94. P. 303403-303403.
229. Letter to Mr. Kevin Hess, PADER, from Mr. Victor J.
Janosik, U.S. EPA, re: Uranium contamination of
groundwater, 6/14/94. P. 303404-303408. A facsimile
cover sheet and a Preliminary Report of Analysis dated
June 3, 1994 are attached.
230. Letter to Mr. Kevin Hess, PADER, from Mr. Victor J.
Janosik, U.S. EPA, re: Request for review of the Final
Draft of the Record of Decision, 6/15/94. P. 303409-
303410.
231. Letter to Mr. Peter H. Kostmayer, U.S. EPA, from Mr.
James W. Rue, PADER, re: Concurrence with the Record
of Decision, 6/27/94. P. 303411-303412.
232. Record of Decision, Austin Avenue Radiation Site,
Declaration, 6/27/94. P. 303413-303559.
26
-------
IV.
REMEDIAL RESPONSE PLANNING
1.
Memorandum to file from Mr. Walter Lee, U.S. EPA, ;re:
Pollut~on Report #3 and an Action Memorandum to '
document the approval of a $50,000 removal activation,
6/18/91. P. 400001-400004.
2.
Memorandum to Mr. Donald R. Clay, U.S. EPA, from Mr.
Edwin B. Er~ckson, u.S. EPA, re: Approval of a request
for additional funds for a removal action, 7/23/91.
P. 400005-400028. The following are attached:
a)
a m~orandum regarding the request for
additional funds for a removal action, dated
July 23, 1991;
a memorandum regarding Pollution Report #3
and an Action Memorandum documenting a
$5u,uvu removal activation, aatea June ~~,
1991;
b)
c)'
a site location map;
d)
a diagram of the site;
e)
, a memorandum regarding the revised cost
estimate for survey and site assessment,
dated June 26, 1991;
f)
a memorandum'regarding the cost estimate for
survey and site assessment, dated June 25,
1991;
g)
the Scope of Work for Lansdowne; PA Survey
and Site Assessment;
h)
an Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease
'Registry (ATSDR) Record of Activity, dated
November 13, 1991. ' ;
3 .
Memorandum to Mr. Donald R. Clay, u.S. EPA, from Mr.
Edwin B. Erickson, u.s. EPA, re: Approval of a request
for a change in the Scope of Response for the Removal
Action, 11/21/91. P. 400029-400037. A memorandum
dated November 21, 1991 regarding the request for a
change in the Scope of Work for Removal Action is
attached.
4.
Memorandum to Mr. Donald R. Clay, U.S. EPA, from Mr.
Edwin B. Erickson, U.S. EPA, re: Approval of a request.
for additional funds for the removal action, 11/21/91.
P. 400038-400066. The following are attached:
27
-------
------
5.
a)
a memorandum regarding a request for
additional funds for the removal action,
dated November 21, 1991; /
b)
a site location map;
a diagram of the site;
c)
d)
a u.s. EPA fact sheet regarding the issuance
of a Federal Public Health Advisory, dated
September 30, 1991;
.
a letter regarding the Public Health
Advisory, dated September 6, 1991;
e)
-
f)
g)
the Public Health Advisory;
a memorandum regarding a health consultation
June 28, 1991;
. .
Memorandum to Mr. Don R. Clay, u.S. EPA, from Mr. Henry
L. Longest, II, U.S. EPA, re: Request for a ceiling
increase and exemption from the-$2 million and 12 month
statutory limits, 3/10/92. P. 400067-400108. The
following are attached:
b)
d)
..
a)
a memorandum regarding a request for a
ceiling increase and exemption from the $2
million and 12 month statutory limits,
(undated), with portions underlined;
a memorandum regarding a request for a
ceiling increase and exemption from the $2
million and 12 month statutory limits, dated.
February 14, 1992;
c)
a memorandum regarding a request for a
ceiling increase and exemption f~om the $2
million and 12 month statutory limits,
(undated) ;
e)
a letter regarding EPA's activities at the
site, dated February 5, 1992;
a memorandum regarding a health consultation,
dated January 10, 1992;
f)
Radiation Risks among Relocated and
Non-Relocated Persons at the Austin Avenue
Site, dated January 28, 1992;
28
-------
6.
Basis for Relocation Decisions at the Austin
Avenue Superfund Site, dated January 6, 1992.
Memorandum to Mr. Donald R. Clay, u.S. EPA, from Mr.
Edwin B. Erickson, u.S. EPA, re:. Approval of a request
for a change in the Scope of Response for additional
funds, 7/9/92. P. 400109-400117. A memorandum dated
July 9, 1992 regarding a request fo~ a change in the
Scope of Work and additional funds over the $2 million
statutory limit is attached.
g)
7.
Memorandum to Mr. Donald R. Clay, u.S. EPA, from Mr.
Edwin B. Erickson, u.S. EPA, re: Approval of a request
for additional funds over the $2 million statutory
limit for removal actions, 10/20/92. P. 400118-400129.
A memorandum dated October 20, 1992 regarding the.
request for additional funds over the $2 million
statutory limit for removal actions is attached.
..
29
-------
v.
COMMUNITY INVOLvEMENT/CONGRESSIONAL CORRESPONDENCE/IMAGERY
1.
2.
3 .
4.
5.
6.
7.
8 .
9.
10.
Map, Eastern Delaware County showing the two-mile/
radius where EPA's scanner van measured for radium,
1990. P. 500001-500001.
Newspaper article entitled "Radium: Yesterday's
marvel, tod~y's mess," The PhiladelDhia Inauirer, 1991
P. 500002-500003.
Newspaper article entitled "Private testing triggers
'hot' tip," Daily Times, 6/20/91. P. 500004-500007.
.
Newspaper article entitled "EPA preliminary reports:
Homes near radioactive house safe," News of Delaware.
County, 6/26/91. P. 500008-500008.
Newspaper article entitled "EPA investigates house for
high radiation levels," The PhiladelDhia Inauirer,
6/30/91. P. 500009-500009.
u.S. EPA Fact Sheet, re: Background and EPA activity
information, 7/91. P. 500010~500010.
u.S. EPA Fact Sheet, re: Offering of household
radiation surveys, 7/17/91. P. 500011-500011.
U.S. EPA Fact Sheet, re: Availability of EPA staff to
discuss the site, 7/19/91. P. 500012-500012.
...
u.S. EPA Public Notice, re: Announcement of a public
meeting, 7/27/91. P. 500013-500013.
Newspaper article entitled "EPA: Radiation no
'substantial health risk' to neighbors," News of
Delaware County, 7/31/91. P. 500014-500014.
11.. Newspaper article entitled "EPA rechecks 'hot' house,"
Delaware County Dailv Times, 9/18/91. P. ~00015-
500015.
12.
13.
14.
Newspaper article entitled "Early tests indicate high
radiation level in Lansdowne house," The PhiladelDhia
Inauirer, 9/26/91. P. 500016-500016.
u.S. EPA Fact Sheet, re:
Health Advisory, 9/30/91.
Issuance of a Federal Public
P. 500017-500018.
Newspaper article.entitled "Feds ticket 'hot' house for
cleanup," Delaware Countv Daily Times, 10/1/91.
P. 500019-500019.
30
-------
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
Newspaper article entitled "EPA declares another
Superfund site in Lansdowne," News of Delaware County,
10/2/91. P. 500020-500021. /
u.S. EPA Fact Sheet, re: The radiation scann~r van,
11/5/91. P. 500022-500023. A description of the
scanner van is attached.
.
Newspaper article entitled "'Hot house' owner rips
feds," Delaware County Daily Times, 11/5/91.
P. 500024-500024.
c
Newspaper article entitled "'Hot' warehouse to turn
orange before demolition," Delaware County Daily Times,
11/8/91. P. 500025-500025.
Newspaper article entitled "EPA urged to buy Superfund
hcms~;" Th~ Philadelnhia Inm1ir~r; 11/10/91-
P. 500026-500026.
Newspaper article entitled "EPA searches 4 towns for
missing radium," News of Delaware County, 11/13/91.
P. 500027-500027. A newspaper .article entitled
"Landlord faces foreclosure" is attached.
..
u.S. EPA Environmental News, re: Three new
contaminated locations found by the scanner van,
11/14/91. P. 500028-500029.
Newspaper article entitled "EPA detects tainting," The
Philadelchia Inquirer, 11/14/91. P. 500030-500030.
Newspaper headline entitled "Evacuated, EPA takes
family from 'hot' house," Daily Times, 11/15/91.
P. 500031-500031. .
Newspaper article entitled "EPA orders 2 to evacua~e
house in E. Lansdowne over radiation," The: .Philadelchia
Inauirer, 11/15/91. P. 500032-500033. Two newspaper
articles entitled EPA finds radiation at another site"
and "Senator Spector plans to visit radium site in
Lansdowne" are attached.
Newspaper article entitled "Owners must leave
radioactive home in E. Lansdowne," News of Delaware
County, 11/20/91. P. 500034-500035.
Newspaper article entitled "Family moved out," Daily
Times, 11/21/91. P. 500036-500037. A title page
entitled "Another 'hot' house" is attached.
31
-------
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37."
38.
U.S. EPA Fact Sheet, re: Site background and present
activities, 11/22/91. P. 500038-500039.
","
Newspaper article entitled "Radiation forces 2nd E.
Lansdowne evacuation," The Philadelchia Inauirer,
11/22/91. P. 500040-500040. Two newspaper articles
entitled "3rd radon evacuation" and "More radon tests
near warehouse" are attached.
Newspaper article entitled "EPA broadens search for
radiation in area buildings," The Philadelchia
Inauirer ,- 11/~3/91. P. 500041-500041.
Newspaper article entitled "'Hot' scan expands," Sunday
Times, 11/24/91. P. 500042-500043.
Newspaper article entitled "5 homes in borough
contamiriated," The Philadelchia Inquirer, 11/24/91.
P. 500044-500046.
Newspaper article entitled "EPA to delay Deleo search
for radiation," The Philadelchia Inauirer, 11/26/91.
P. 500047-500047.
Newspaper article entitled "EPA targets 3 more homes," ~
News of Delaware County, 12/4/91. P. 500048-500048.
Newspaper article entitled "Feds ID low-risk find,"
Delaware County Daily Times, 12/4/91. P. 500049-
500049.
U.S. EPA Fact Sheet, re: Health information about
radium and radon, 12/5/91. P. 500050-500051.
Newspaper article entitled "EPA fields questions on
radiation problem," Delaware County Daily Times,
12/6/91. "P. 500052-500052.
,
Newspaper article entitled "Her obsession is
radiation," The Philadelchia-Inauirer, 12/6/91.
P. 500053-500055. A partial newspaper article entitled
"In E. Lansdowne, lives changed overnight" is attached.
Newspaper article entitled "Feds expand radiation scan
into South West Philly," Delaware County Daily Times,
12/10/91. P. 500056-500056. A partial untitled
newspaper article, and two newspaper articles entitled
"More radiation checks" and "EPA expands radiation
tests in Upper Darby, Clifton Heights" are attached.
32
-------
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
Newspaper article entitled "Why radiation wasn't found
in Lansdowne seven years ago," News of Delaware County,
12/11/91. P. 500057-500058. Two newspaper articles
entitled "Two video tapes about radiation available"
and "People tense about radiation, health concerns" are
attached. -
Newspaper a;-ticle entitled "Families invisible threat:
Radium," USA Today, 12/12/91. P. 500059-500059.
U.S. EPA Fact Sheet, re:
P. 500060-500Q61.
Site history, 12/13/91.
Newspaper article entitled "Irradiated Sand Imperils
Penns¥lvania Houses," The New York Times, 12/15/91.
P. 500062-500062.
NewsDaDer article entitled "West Phila. homes rated
safe from radioactivity," The PhiladelDhia Daily News,
12/18/91. P. 500Q63-500063.
Newspaper article entitled "EPA says West Phila. is
free of radiation," The PhiladelDhia Inquirer,
12/18/91. P. 500064-500064.
Newspaper article entitled "'Hot' property to be
razed," Delaware County Daily Times, 12/18/91.
P. 500065-500065.
Sierra Watch Fact Sheet, prepared by Sierra Club
Centennial, 1992. P. 500066-500066.
U.S. EPA Fact Sheet, re:
P. 500067-500070.
Site activities, 1/3/92.
Newspaper article entitled "Survey Finds 25 Homes
Tainted by Radium," The New York Times, 1/5/92.
P. 500071-500072. .
Newspaper article entitled "'Hot' building will be
razed," Daily Times, 1/7/92. P. 500073-500074.
Newspaper article entitled "Feds field 'hot' quires,"
Delaware County Daily Times, 1/8/92. P. 500075-500075.
Newspaper article entitled "4 more radioactive homes
found: EPA's test~ng is complete," News of Delaware
County, 1/8/92. P. 500076-500077.
Letter to residents from Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA,
re: Site activities and parking restrictions, 1/20/92.
P. 500078-500078.
33
-------
53.
54.
55.
56.
-
..-.- - - ---,:,:.:-.- ~..;: :-.:.;.. . .
Newspaper article entitled II 'Hot' houses, II Delaware
Count v Sunday Times, 1/26/92. P. 500079-500080.
/.-
U.S. EPA Fact Sheet, re: Radon testing information,
1/30/92. P. 500081-500082.
Newspaper article entitled "Follow-up testing IDs two
more 'hot' homes, II Delaware County Dailv Times,
1/31/92. P. 500083-500083. A newspaper article
entitled IIRadiation cleanup beginsll is attached.
Newspaper art~cle entitled "Two more houses in Deleo
found to be contaminated," The philadeluhia Inauirer,
1/31/92. P. 500084-500084.
Newspaper article entitled "'Hot' residents want state
aid, II Dailv Times, 2/3/92. P. 500085-500085.
58.. U.S. EPA Fact Sheet, re: A media briefing about the
site, 2/7/92. P. 500086-500086. .
57.
59.
60.
61.
Newspaper article entitled "Another hot house found,"
News of Delaware County, 2/19/92. P. 500087-500087.
Two newspaper articles entitled "EPA finds high
radiation in another home in Deleo" and IIAnother toxic ~
house" are attached.
Newspaper article entitled "'Hot' spots in the park,"
Delaware County Dailv Times, 2/25/92. P. 500088-
500088. .
Newspaper article entitled "Radioactive soil found in
and near Yeadon Park," The philadeluhia Inauirer,
2/25/92. P. 500089-500089.
62. Newspaper article entitled "EPA finds no radiation at
Yeadon swim club," The philadeluhia Inauirer, 3/3/92.
. P. 500090-500090.
63.
Newspaper photograph entitled "'Hot' warehouse
dismantled," Delaware County Daily Times, 3/6/92.
P. 500091-500091.
64.
Newspaper photograph entitled "Radium site cleanup
. continues," The philadeluhia Inauirer, 3/12/92.
P. 500092-500092.
65.
Newspaper article entitled "Tax break sought for
tainted homes," The philadeluhia Inauirer, 3/14/92.
P. 500093-500093.
34
-------
66.
67.
68.
69.
70.
71.
72.
73.
74.
75.
76.
Article entitled "The Mobile Scanner Van Reports for
Duty," (no source cited), 6/92. P. 500094-500095.
,.
U.S. EPA Fact Sheet, re:
P. 500096-500096.
Site activities, 6/92.
Newspaper article entitled "Is soil at Bartol Tract
contaminateg?, " News of Delaware County, 6/17/92.
P. 500097-500097.
Letter to Dr. Walter F. Lee, U.S. EPA, from a resident,
re: Confirma~ion of the residents preference for EPA
to furnish them with a new home pending demolition
8/3/92. P. 500098-500098.
Letter to resident from Mr. Walter F. Lee, U.S. EPA,
re: Clarification of options for remediation, 8/28/92.
P. 500099-500104. A letter dated September II, 1992
regarding a resident's preference for the demolition
option and a letter dated September 19, 1992 regarding
clarification of why EPA can not purchase property are
attached.
Letter to Dr. Walter F. Lee, U:S. EPA, from a resident,
re: Clarification of the three options for remediation~
and preference for the demolition option, 8/28/92.
P. 500105-500107. A memorandum dated August 14, 1992
regarding removal of mortar and samples taken from a
house is attached.
Letter to Dr. Lee, U.S. EPA, from a resident, re: .
Response to review of the Characterization Report for
the residents house and preference for relocation,
9/3/92. P. 500108-500109.
Handwritten letter Mr. Walter Lee, U.S. EPA, from a
resident, re: Remediation option preferences, 9/8/92.
P. 500110-500110.
Newspaper article entitled "Deadly radon threatens
area," The Philadelohia Daily News, 9/29/92.
P. 500111-500111.
Newspaper article entitled "'Hot houses' under review,"
Delaware County Daily Times, 10/5/92. P. 500112-
500112. .
Newspaper article entitled nEPA, owner duel over 133
Austin Ave.,n The Philadelohia Inauirer, 10/8/92.
P. 500113-500113.
35
-------
77.
78.
79.
80.
81.
82.
83.
84.
85.
86.
87.
- .-.- -. -
u.s. EPA Environmental News entitled "EPA Adds Austin
Avenue Radiation Site To Its National Priorities List,"
10/14/92. P. 500114-500117.
/.-
Newspaper article entitled "29 contaminated homes in
Deleo added to Superfund cleanup list," The -
Philadelchia Inauirer, 10/15/92. P. 500118-500118.
Handwritten letter to Walter from a resident, re:
Concerns about radiation in the residents' home,
10/21/92. P. 500119-500120.
Memorandum to. file from Mr. Victor J. Janosik, u.S.
EPA, re: Summary of an October 22, 1992 public
meeting, 10/28/92. P. 500121-500122.
Memorandum to residents from Mr. Thomas C. Voltaggio,
u.S. EPA, re: Invitation to attend a meeting with EPA,
11/9/92. P. 500123-500125. A Superfund Remedial
Process table and the proposed agenda for the meeting
are attached. '
Memorandum to file from Mr. Victor J., Janosik, u.S.
EPA, .re: Summary of a meeting with property owners,-
12/9/92. P. 500126-500127.
Letter to Mr. Victor Janosik, u.S. EPA, from a
resident, re: Choice of remedial option "C" for
demolition and reconstruction, 1/29/93. P. 500128-
500130. A letter dated August 27, 1992 regarding
selection of remedial option B for relocation is
attached.
Letter to resident from Mr. Victor J. Janosik, u.S.
EPA, re: Explanation of the relocation option,
2/12/93. P. 500131-500133. A letter dated January 29,
1993 regarding a choice of remedial option'C is
attached.
Memorandum to file from Mr. Victor J. Janosik, u.S.
EPA, re: Health'consultation session sponsored by
ATSDR, 2/17/93. P. 500134-500134.
Six graphs of radiation dosages theoretically possible
from radiation contaminated soils at the former W.L.
CUmmings warehouse, prepared by u.S. EPA, 3/1/93.
P. 500135-500140. ' ,
Diagram of 135 Austin Avenue, 3/24/93.
500141.
P. 500141-
36
-------
88.
89.
90.
92.
91..
~~.
93.
94.
95.
96.
97.
98.
99.
Letter to Mr. Victor Janosik, U.S. EPA, from a
resident, re: Request for information on site
activities, 4/9/93. P. 5001.42-500142.
/.,
Letter to neighbor from Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, re:
Site activity update, 5/14/93. P. 500143-500144. A
table. of remedial and removal activities is attached.
Map showing the location of the former W.L. Cummings
facility, (undated). P. 500145-500146.
Newspaper article entitled "'Hotter' house," (no source
cited), (undated). P. 500147-5001.47.
Newspaper article entitled "EPA Evacuates home," (no
source cited), (undated). P. 500148-500148.
~~W~~~~~L aL~icl~ ~~titl=~
source cited), (undated).
newspaper article entitled
radius" is attached.
n~,.,,,,-
.... ~ .
u~ ~~~~ ~~~~~~ n {nn
...- ---- ------ -, ,---
P. 500149-5001.49. A
"Feds expand health risk
Newspaper article entitled "More 'hot' houses ID'd,"
Dailv Times, (undated). P. 500150-5001.50.
Newspaper article entitled "Another Lansdowne home
shows high radiation; evacuation urged," The
Philadelchia Inauirer, (undated). P. 500151-500151.
Newspaper article entitled "More 'hot' houses (no
source cited), (undated). P.500152-500152.
Newspaper article entitled "3 more 'hot' homes," (no
source cited), (undated). P. 500153-5001.53.
Newspaper article entitled "Channel 31 tackles
'hothouse~ issue," (no source cited), (undated).
P. 500154-500154.
Newspaper article entitled "EPA starts cleanup at two
sites," The Philadelchia Inauirer, (undated).
P. 500155-500156.
Newspaper article entitled "Radium plant yielded more
sand than believed," The Philadelchia Inauirer,
(undated). P. 500157-500158.
100. Newspaper article entitled "3 'hot' houses found," (no
source cited), (undated). P. 500159-500159.
101. Newspaper article entitled "EPA IDs 'hot houses' ," (no
source cited), (undated). P. 500160-5001.60.
37
-------
102. Newspaper article entitled "Council urged to bar
traffic from street," The PhiladelDhia Inauirer,
(undated). P. 500161-500161.
/.
103. Newspaper article entitled "EPA will delay search in
Deleo for radiation," The PhiladelDhia Inauirer,
(undated). P. 500162-500162.
104. Newspaper article entitled "Daly blasts GOP for cleanup
chaos," (no source cited), (undated). P. 500163-
500163. .
105. Journal artic],e entitled "Radon Contamination Detected
In 25 Philadelphia Area Homes," Nuclear Waste News
(undated). P. 500164-500165.
106. Newspaper article entitled "Radium meeting set," (no
source cited), (undated). P. 500166-500166.
107. Newspaper article entitled "EPA forums on radiation set
. in Delaware County," (no source cited), (undated).
P. 500167-500167.
108. U.S. EPA Fact Sheet, re: Announcement of an
information repository, (undated). P. 500168-500168:
...
109. NPL site description summary, Austin Avenue Radiation
Site, (undated). P. 500169-500169.
110. Fact Sheet, r~: Listing of the site on the NPL,
(undated). P. 500170-500171. A list of property
addresses is attached.
111. U.S. EPA Environmental Advisory, re: EPA Cleans Up
Five Austin Avenue Site Houses, (undated). P. 500172-.
500173.
112. Handwritten note to Walter [Lee], re: Decision to
. relocate, (undated). P. 500174-500174.
113. Handwritten letter to Walter, re: Decision to
relocate, (undated). P. 500175-500178. A handwritten
letter regarding a resident's concerns about
contamination at their home and a Family Day Care Home
Certification of Registration are attached.
114. Newspaper article entitled "Man Has New... In Radium,"
(no source cited), . (undated). P. 500179-500180.
38
-------
115. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. BPA, from Mr. Robert &
Ms. Sarah Cocciardi, re: Comments and questions on
EPA's proposed recommendations and recommended solution
for remedial action at the effected property, 6/29/93.
P. 500181-500181.
116. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. BPA, from Ms.
Joanne Kammer and Harry,o Julia, and Barbara Kammer, re:
Concern about the radiation contamination problem,
6/29/93. P. 500182-500182.
117. Letter to Mr. ~Stanley Laskowski, U.S. BPA, from The
Giovannucci Family, re: Concern about the radiation
contamination problem, 6/30/93. P. 500183-500183.
118. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. BPA, from Ms.
Cathleen C. Daly, re: Concern about the radiation
contamination problem, 6/30/93. P. 500184-500184.
119. Letter to The Honorable Robert P. Casey, State of
Penn~ylvania, from Mr. Robert andoMs.-Susan Hart, re:
Concern about the radiation contamination problem,
6/30/93. P. 500185-500185.
-
120o' Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. BPA, from Ms.
Rosemarie Richardson, re: Concern about the radiation
contamination problem, 6/30/93. P. 500186-500186.
121. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. BPA, from Ms.
Karen McNamara, re: Concern about the radiation
contamination problem, 6/30/93. P. 500187-500187.
122. Letter to The Honorable Robert P. Casey, State of
Pennsylvania, from The Clark Family, re: Concern
the radiation contamination problem, 6/30/93.
P. 500188-500188.
about
123. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA,; from Mr. &
Mrs. Ashton L. Townsley, re: Concern about the
radiation contamination problem, 6/30/93. P. 500189-
500189.
124. Letter to The Honorable Robert P. Casey, State of
pennsylvania, from Ms. Virginia Cullen and Mr. David T.
. Cullen, re: Concern about the radiation contamination
problem, 7/1/93. P. 500190-500190.
125. Letter to The Honorable Robert P. Casey, State of
Pennsylvania, from Mr. Charles & Ms. Joan Lobb, re:
Concern about the radiation contamination problem,
7/1/93. P. 500191-500191.
39
-------
126. Letter to Mr. Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Kenneth &
Ms. Patricia Wright, re: Concern about the radiation
contamination problem, 7/1/93. P. 500192-500192./.
127. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Craig W.
Mann, Sharon Savings Bank, re: Comments on the June
30, 19.93 EPA Public Notice and request for response,
7/1/93. P. .500193 -500193.
128. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Mr.
Robert and Mrs. Mary Jane DiChiacchio, re: Concern
about unsafe ~omes in the Lansdowne neighborhood,
7/1/93. P. 500194-500194.
129. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Ms. .
patriciann E. Lord, re: Concern about the radiation
contamination problem, 7/2/93. P. 500195-500195.
130. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Peter B.
Hill and Ms. Helen N. Hill, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative for cleaning up the radium-
contaminated properties, 7/2/93. P. 500196-500196.
131. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Mr. -
Nicholas J. Arone and Ms. patricia L. Arone, re:
Concern about the radiation contamination problem,
7/4/93. P. 500197-500197.
132. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Ms.
Lucille and Mr. Ryland Hanger, re: Concern about the
radiation contamination problem, 7/4/93. P. 500198-
500198.
133. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Mr. &.
Mrs. Carmen Pratico, re: Concern about the radiation
contamination problem, 7/6/93. P. 500199-500199.
134. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA,. from Ms.
Jane and Ms. Wendy C. Sheeran, re: Concern about the
radiation contamination problem, 7/6/93. P. 500200-
500200.
135. Letter to The Honorable Robert P. Casey, State of
Pennsylvania, from Mr. George P. Butts and Ms. Grace
Butts, re: Concern about the radiation contamination
problem, 7/6/93. P. 500201-500201.
136. Letter to Mr. staniey Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Mr.
William J. Baratta and Ms. Mary Lou Baratta, re:
Concern about the radiation contamination problem,
7/6/93. P. 500202-500202.
40
-------
137. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, u.S. EPA, from Mr.
Richard E. Morrell, re: Concern about the radiation
contamination problem, 7/6/93. P. 500203 -.500203. /..
138. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, u.S. EPA,
Patrick J. Butler and Ms. Susan W. Butler,
about the radiation contamination problem,
P. 500204-500204.
from Mr.
re: Concern
7/6/93.
139. Letter to Mr. Laskowski, u.S. EPA, from Ms. Stephanie
Mouzakitis, re: Concern about the radiation
contamination. problem, 7/6/93. P..500205-500205.
140. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Robert
A. Merieau, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/6/93. P. 500206-500206.
141. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Mr.
u': -1....--' u-_t.._....:.,..,.. ,..~~,.."" 'A"",~...,;,..'!!S T"",,.. ...-0.. ('"'"..,,..0....."-"
....~~..""""-... ...~_.......,.-.......-, ------ --..-----, ----., - - - ---------
about the clean up of commercial properties, 7/7/93.
P. 500207-500207.
142. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Mamie
McCanney, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/7/93. P. 500208-500208.
143. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Susan L.
McGram, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/7/93. P. 500209-500209.
144. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, u.s. EPA, from Mr.
Randal L. Mattern and Ms. Monica Mattern, re: Concern
about the radiation contamination problem, 7/8/93.
P. 500210-500210.
145. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Ms;
Karen E. Roper, re: Concern about the radiation
contamination problem, 7/8/93. P. 500211-500211.
, .
146. Letter to The Honorable Robert P. Casey, State of
Pennsylvania, from Ms. Anna H. Piselli, re:. Concern
about the radiation contamination problem, 7/8/93.
P. 500212-500212.
147. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, u.s. EPA, from Torpey
J. White, re: Concern about the radiation
contamination prob~em, 7/8/93. P. 500213-500213.
148. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, u.S. EPA, from Ms.
DarIa A. Pinte, re: Concern about the radiation
contamination problem, 7/8/93. P. 500214-500214.
41
-------
149. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Amy
& Mr. Al Tielemans, Tielemans, re: Concern about the
radiation contamination problem, 7/8/93. P. 5002~5-
500215.
150. Letter to The Honorable Robert P. Casey, State of
Pennsylvania, from Ms. Carol A. Plichter, re: Concern
about the radiation contamination problem, 7/8/93.
P. 500216-500216.
151. Letter to The Honorable Robert P. Casey, State of
Pennsylvania, .from Ms. Ann M. Boyd, re: Concern about
the radiation contamination problem, 7/8/93.
P. 500217-500217.
152. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Daniel
Coladonato, re: Concern about thoroughness of the
radium test and request for an inside radiation test to
be performed on the Coladonato property, 7/8/93.
P. 500218-500218. .
153. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Ms.
Nancy S. Bendon, re: Concern about the radiation
contamination problem, 7/9/93. P. 500219-500219.
..
154. Letter to The Honorable Robert P. Casey, State of
Pennsylvania, from Mr. Robert G. Faulkner, re: Concern
about the radiation contamination problem, 7/9/93.
P. 500220-500220.
155. Letter to The Honorable Robert P. Casey, State of
Pennsylvania, from Mr. Armand & Ms. Jean Di Rienzie,
re: Concern about the radiation contamin~tion problem,
7/9/93. P. 500221-500221.
156. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms~ Yvonne
H. Adams, .re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/9/93. P. 500222-500222.
, .
157. Memorandum to Mr. Frank Coyle, Mr. Lew Felleisen, and
Mr. Bill Belanger, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Mike Pyles, .
PADER, re: Letters received from Lansdowne residents,
7/9/93. P. 500223-500226. A facsimile cover sheet, a
letter concerning the radiation contamination problem,
and a letter concerning EPA's preferred alternative are
attached.
158. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowki [sic], U.S. EPA, from
Mr. Matthew R. Zarkos, re: Concern about the radiation.
contamination problem, 7/11/93. P. 500227-500227.
42
-------
159. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Ann
Marie and Ms. Winifred Finn and families, re: Concern
about the radiation contamination problem, 7/11/93.
P. 500228-500228. .
160. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Werner
and Ms. Susanna Koethe, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred a~ternative, 7/12/93. P. 500229-500229.
161. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms.
Catherine F. Murray, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alt~rnative, 7/12/93. P. 500230-500230.
162. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Barbara
DiPi~ro, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/12/93. P. 500231-500231.
.. ,....,
.\,,1- .
~~~~~= ~~ M~. ~~=nnp- Nurs~: u.S. EPA. from Mr. John
Hetherington, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/12193. P. 500232-500232.
164. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Helen R.
Bowes, re: Disapproval of EPA'.s preferred alternative,
7/12/93. P. 500233-500233.
165. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Ana
Fong, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,
7/12/93. P. 500234-500234.
166. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Mrs.
Alice C. Borowik, re: Concern about the radiation
contamination problem, 7/12/93. P. 500235-500235.
167. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.s. EPA, from Mr.
Keith B. McLennan, re: Concern about the radiation
contamination problem, 7/12/93. P. 500236-500236.
168. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from; Dr. Wilma
Mitchell, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/12/93. P. 500237-500237. .
169. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Joseph
McMurray, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/12/93. P. 500238-500238.
170. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Gail K.
Wheatley, re: Disqpproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/12/93. P. 500239-500239.
171. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Thomas
A. Wheatley, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/12/93. P. 500240-500240.
43
-------
.
172. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. William
A. Eberle, Jr., re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/12/93. P. 500241-500241.
/
173. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Maureen
c. Eberle, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/12/93. P. 500242-500242.
174. Letter to Mayor Rankin, Borough of Lansdowne, from Mr.
James & Ms. Linda McElroy, re: Concern about housing
values and relocating, 7/12/93. P.500243-500243.
175. Letter to Ms.. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Ruth F.
Rosser, re: Concern about residence destruction and no
compensation, 7/12/93. P. 500244-500J44.
176. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from The Reverend
. & Mrs. Paul Guthweebt [sic], re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, 7/13/93. P. 500245-500245.
177. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Linda R.
Kauthe [sic], re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/13/93. P. 500246-500246.
178. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Ms. -
. ElaYne Smith, re: Concern about the radiation
contamination problem, 7/13/93. P~ 500247-500247.
179. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Ms.
ElaYne Smith, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/13/93. P. 500248-500248. .
180. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. ElaYne
Smith, re: Concern about the radiation contamination
problem, 7/13/93. P. 500249-500249.
181. Letter toMs. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. ElaYne
Smith, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,
. 7/13/93. P. 500250-200250. .
182. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. George
Stom [sic], re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/13/93. P. 500251-500251.
183. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA,
. J. O'Brien and Ms. Joan O'Brien, re:
EPA's preferred alternative, 7/13/93.
500252.
from Mr. Thomas
Disapproval of
P. 500252-
44
-------
184. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Mark J.
Du Frayne and Ms. Rosemary Du Frayne, re: Request for
an extension of the official comment period to prepare
a reasonable response to the proposed plan, 7/13/93.
P. 500253-500253.
185. Letter. to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Ed and
Ms. Mary Beth Sherrier, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, 7/13/93. P. 500254-500254.
186. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. William
McGregor, re: f Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/14/93. P. 500255-500255.
187. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Glen
Toll, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,
7/14/93. P. 500256-500256.
188. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. William
and Ms. Karen Koski, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, 7/14/93. P. 500257-500257.
189. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. John F.
Hughes, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/14/93. P. 500258-500258.
190. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Thomas
McHugh and Family, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/14/93. P. 500259-500259.
191. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Eleanor
S. MacMullen, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/14/93. P. 500260-500260.
192. Letter to Mr. Laskowski, u.S. EPA, from Mr. Robert M.
Melendez [sic], re: Concern about the radiation
contamination problem, 7/14/93. P. 500261-500261.
193. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from'Mr. Charles
Kotze, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,
7/14/93. P. 500262-500262. .
194. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. William
Vanderbilt, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/14/93. P. 500263-500263.
195. Letter to Ms. Le~e Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Charles
& Ms. Elizabeth Kotze, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, 7/14/93. P. 500264-500264.
45
-------
196. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Dr. and Mrs.
Walter Engle, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/14/93. P. 500265-500265. /,-
197. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Dr.
Lenwood B. Wert, re: List of concerns as to EPA's
handling of the contamination problem, 7/14/93.
P. 500266-500271. A letter regarding disapproval of
EPA's handling of site actions and an article entitled
"Case Crumbles in Weaver Trial" are attached.
198. Letter to Ms. .Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. & Mrs.
Michael Foschi, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/14/93. P. 500272-500273. A list of
people who have received copies of the letter are
--___'__3 .
c:L\" \"c:L\";~~I::Y.
199. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Karen
Dyslishi, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/15/93. P. 500274-500274.
200. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms.
Christine T. Burns, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/15/93. P. 500275-500275.
201'. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U. S. EPA, from Mr. Joseph
L. Vetter, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/15/93. P. 500276-500276.
202. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. -Hollie
and Mr. John Palo, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/15/93. P. 500277-500277.
203. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mrs. Hilda -
M. Christman, re: Concern about the radiation
contamination problem, 7/15/93. P. 500278-500278.
204. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from: Mrs. Hilda
M. Christman, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/15/93. P. 500279-500279.
205. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Carolyn
Mooney, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/15/93. P. 500280-500280.
206. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. John H.
Bloom and Ms. Margery S. Bloom, re: Disapproval of
EPA's preferred alternative, 7/15/93. P. 500281-
500281.
46
-------
207. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Dorothea
D. Cathill, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/15/93. P. 500282-500282.
/.-
-.a -- _.-._-~-=
208. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Ms.
Marie A. McCloskey, re: Concern about the radiation
contamination problem, 7/15/93. P. 500283-500283.
209. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Rodney
F. Rafetto, Jr. and Family, re:Disappointment with
the proposal concerning the remediation plan and
response and comments to the proposed relocation action
and remediatidn, 7/15/93. P. 500284-500288. A cover
letter is attached.
210. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Edward
J. Niezgoda and Dennel J. Niezgoda, re: Disapproval of
the remedy for the radiation contamination problem,
7!1=!~~. P. 5002Bq-~nn?Rq.
211. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Gerard
F. Dillon, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/15/93. P. 500290-500290.
-
212. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Richard ~
and Ms. Virginia Goerlach, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, 7/16/93. P. 500291-500291.
213. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. & Mrs.
Stephen Love, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/16/93. P. 500292-500292.
214. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. William
G. Ralston Jr. and Wife, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, 7/16/93. P. 500293-500293.
215. Letter to.Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. John A.
O'Connor, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
. alternative, 7/16/93. P. 500294-500294. ;
216. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mrs. Dawn
Hogan, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,
7/16/93. P. 500295-500295.
217. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Michael
P. Hogan, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/16/93. P. 500296-500296.
218. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Michael
and Ms. Kathleen Lion, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, 7/16/93. P. 500297-500297.
47
-------
219. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Wayne W.
Staulor [sic], re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/16/93. P. 500298-500298". /
220. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Ray
Sharrole [sic], re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/16/93. P. 500299-500299.
.
221. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Fred
Travers, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/16/93. P. 500300-500300.
~
222. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Thomas
S. Bannon Jr., re: "Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/16/93. P. 500301-500301.
223. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Mary
Beth Kingston, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/16/93. P. 500302-500302.
224. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA~ from Mr. George
and Ms. Joan March, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/16/93. P. 5003Q3-500303.
225. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mrs. Anne
. Thomas, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/16/93. P. 500304-500304.
..
226. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Evelyn
Robertson, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/16/93. P. 500305-500305.
227. Letter to Ms~ Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. & Mrs.
Boris Longin, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/16/93. P. 500306-500306.
228. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Cindy
. and Mr. Frank Kirkman, re: Disapproval of, EPA's
preferred alternative, 7/16/93~ P. 500307~500307.
229. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr.
Ellsworth and Ms. Elizabeth Van Arsdale, re:
Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative, 7/16/93.
P. 500308-500308.
230. Letter to Ms~ Leanne Nurse, U.S'. EPA, from Ms.
Katherine Chronaker and Mr. George Chronaker, re:
Disapproval of EPA~s preferred alternative, 7/16/93.
P. 500309-500309.
48
-------
231. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse,
Katherine Chronaker and Mr.
Concern about the radiation
7/16/93. P. 500310-500310.
U.s. EPA, from Ms:
George Chronaker, re:
contamination proble~,
232. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Frances
Schultz, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative., 7/16/93. P. '500311-500311.
233. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mrs.
Elizabeth H. Mullin, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, 7/16/93. P. 500312-500312.
.
234. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mrs. D.S.
Daley, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,
7/16/93. P. 500313-500313.
235. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Brett
~oper [s~cJ, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/16/93. P. 500314-500314.
236. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. James M.
Donovan, Jr., re: Disapproval.of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/16/93. P. 500315-500315.
..
237. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Walter
S. Shultz (sic], Jr., re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, 7/16/93. P. 500316-500316.
238. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Ruth M.
Palm, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,
7/16/93. P. 500317-500317. .
239. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Ruth T..
Schwarz, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/16/93. P. 500318-500318.
240.. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from, Mr. Joe &
Ms. Shirlee Kelly, re: Disapproval of EPA~s preferred
alternative, 7/16/93. P. 500319-500319. .
241. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Robert
M. Boucher, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/16/93. P. 500320-500320.
242. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Patricia
D. Dougherty, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/16/93. P. 500321-500321.
243. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Robert
M. Boucher, re: Concern about the radiation
contamination problem, 7/16/93. P. 500322-500322.
49
-------
.
244. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Neriv
D'Andrea and Mr. Richard D'Andrea, re: Disapproval of
EPA's preferred alternative, 7/16/93. P. 500323-/
500323.
245. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. William
and Ms. Barbara Hare, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, 7/16/93. P. 500324-500324.
246. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mrs. Rose
Trabocco, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/16/93. P. 500325-500325.
~
247. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Pat Deesey,
re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,
7/16/93. P. 500326-500326.
248. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. William
Stone, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,
7/16/93. P. 500327-500327.
249. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Glen
Luskzart, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/16/93. P. 500328-500328.
..
250". Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. John A.
Connor, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/16/93. P. 500329-500329.
251. Letter to Ms.' Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Charles
H. Walter, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/16/93. P. 500330-500330.
252. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Gerald
W. Zell [sic], re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/16/93. P. 500331-500331.
253.. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U. S. EPA, from. Mr. & Mrs.
James J. McElroy, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/16/93. P. 500332-500332.
254. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Sarah
Gowan Sapsis, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/16/93. P. 500333-500333.
255. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. John J.
Connell, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/16/93. P. 500334-500334.
256. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Stephen'
Putnelli [sic], re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/16/93. P. 500335-500335.
50
-------
25~. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Michael
Bradley, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/16/93. P. 500336-500336. .
/
258. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Helena
V. Stanley, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/16/93. P. 500337-500337. -
259. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. & Mrs.
Richard J. Hogg, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/16/93. P. 500338-500338.
. 260.
Let ter to Ms. ~eanne Nurse, U. S. EPA, from Mr. Nicholas
J. Arone and Ms. Patricia L. Arone, re: Disapproval of
EPA's preferred alternative, 7/16/93. P. 500339-
500'339.
261. Handwritten letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from
Ms. Maria George, re: Opposition to EPA's proposed
plan Option #4, 7/16/93. P. 500340-500340.
262. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA,' from I. David,
re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,
7/17/93. P. 500341-500341.
263. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Janice
Affonse Ellrich, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/17/93. P. 500342-500342.
264. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Ms.
Karen A. Ulisniewski, re: Concern about the radiation
contamination problem, 7/17/93. P. 500343-500343.
265. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Karen A.
Ulisniewski, re: Concern about the radiation
contamination problem, 7/17/93. P. 500344-500344..
266. Handwritten note to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from
'Mr. Jack & Ms. Theresa Morris, re: Disapproval of
EPA's proposed plan for the cleanup of radium
contaminated properties, 7/17/93. P. 50034~-500345.
267. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Carol B.
Blanning, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/18/93. P. 500346 -500346'.
268. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Inez C.
Di Fabio, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/19/93. P. 500347-500347.
51
-------
269. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Dorothy
A. Dysleski, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/19/93. P. 500348-500348.
,/
270. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. & Mrs.
Eugene H. Finn, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/19/93. P. 500349-500349.
271. Public Hearing Transcript, Austin Avenue Radiation
Superfund Site, 7/19/93. P. 500350-500602. A
transmittal letter is attached.
.
272. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. & Mrs.
Gerald Giannattasio, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, 7/19/93. P. 500603-500603.
273. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, u.S. EPA, from Mr.
John Connelly, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/19/93. P. 500604-500605.
274. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Douglas
z. Hall, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/19/93. P. 500606-500606.
-
275. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mrs. Dolores~
B. Ward, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/19/93. P. 500607-500607.
276. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Samuel
D. & Ms. Winifred F. Mitchell, re: Disapproval. of
EPA's preferred alternative, 7/19/93. P." 500608-
500608.
277. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from R.
Greenleaf, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/19/93. P. 500609-500609.
278~ Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, fro~ Ms. Julia
McDevitt, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/19/93. P. 500610-500610.
279. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Rhonda
McJett, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/19/93. P. 500611-500611.
280. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Mark W.
Goster, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/19/93. P. 500612-500612.
281. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. John
Connelly, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
. alternative, 7/19/93. P. 500613-500614.
52
-------
282. Letter to Mr. Stanley L. Laskowski, u.S. EPA, from
Senator F. Joseph Loeper, Senate of Pennsylvania, re:
Concern about EPA's preferred alternative of demo~~tion
and permanent relocation, 7/19/93. P. 500615-500615.
283. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mayor John
J. Rankin, Jr., Borough of Lansdowne, re: Comments on
the public meeting and the proposed remedial action
alternative-plans, 7/19/93. P. 500616-500620.
284. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms.
Georgeanna Juliano, Greater Lansdowne Civic
Association, ~e: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/19/93. P. 500621-500621.
285. Letter to The Honorable Nicholas A. Micozzie from Ms.
Georgianna Grentzenberg, re: The radioactivity
problem, disapproval of EPA's activities, and the poor
.. ,~-- -~ -~_.__...~-- ~- T__.....;..........."" "/'Q/Q~ '0 c;nn~?.,-
y,ua.........:! v.a.. ~\"4"",,-g,,-.,,,,,.... ......... ...............---..-, -,--,--- -- ------"
500622. .
286. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Robert
E. Bellwoar, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/20/93. P. 5006Z3-500623.
..
287. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.s. EPA,
Samuel D. & Ms. Winifred F. Mitchell, re:
about the radiation contamination problem,
P. 500624-500624.
from Mr.
Concern
7/20/93.
288. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.s. EPA, from Mr.
Robert M. Boucher, re: Concern about the radiation
contamination problem, 7/20/93. P. 500625-500625.
289. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Patricia
Bellwoar, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/20/93. P. 500626-500626.
290. Letter to Mr. Victor Janosik, U.s. EPA, from Dr.
Lenwood B. Wert, re: Disapproval of EPA's activities,
7/20/93. P. 500627-500635. A copy of the letter, a
letter regarding the crisis situation in Lansdowne, and
an article entitled "Shifting Dirt" are attached.
291. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. patricia
A. Baltadonis and Mr. John V. Baltadonis, re:
Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative, 7/20/93.
P. 500636-500636. .
292. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. & Mrs.
Thomas Colella, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/21/93. P. 500637-500637.
53
-------
.... - ..,. .
. - --'-~--'_L. -
293. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Anne E.
Moran, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,
7/21/93. P. 500638-500638. /.
294. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Gloria
J. Gicking, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/21/93. P. 500639-500639.
295. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Carolyn
McKinney-Croix, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/21/93. P. 500640-500640.
f
296. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. & Mrs.
Matthew DeMaria, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alteraative, 7/21/93. P. 500641-500641.
297. Letter .to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Sarah
Rossi, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,
7/21/93. P. 500642-500642.
298. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Rosemary
West, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,.
7/21/93. P. 500643-500643.
299. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Joan H. "
Graham, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/21/93. P. 500644-500644.
300. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Dr. Blair
Holl, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,
7/21/93. P. 500645-500645.
301. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr.
Christopher J. Harin, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, 7/21/93. P. 500646-500646..
302. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mrs. Edith
. Bootner, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferrf;!d
alternative, 7/21/93. P. 500647-500647.
303. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Donna &
Mr. Kenneth O'Brien, re: Disapproval of EPA's .
preferred alternative, 7/21/93. P. 500648-500648.
304. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA,
P. Lewis, Vacuums Reconditioned, re:
EPA's preferred al~ernative, 7/21/93.
500649.
. from Mr. William
Disapproval of
. P. 500649-
305. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. James R.
Achuff, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/22/93. P. 500650-500650.
54
-------
I
3a6. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Robert
J. Jones and Ms. Michele J. Pressley-Jones, re:
Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative, 7/22/~3.
P. 500651-500651.
307. Letter to President Bill Clinton from Mr. Ji~ and Ms.
Linda McElroy, re: Concerns surrounding EPA's decision
to demolish homes because of radiation contamination,
7/22/93. P. 500652-500653.
308. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Lucille
T. Fisher, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, "/23/93. P. 500654-500654.
309. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Shankar P.
Barua, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,
7/23/93. P. 500655-500655.
310. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse. U.S. EPA. from Mr. & Mrs.
Edward C. Wonell, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/23/93. P. 500656-500656.
311. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Ken &
Ms. Edith Sielsch, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferr~d
alternative, 7/23/93. P. 500657-500657.
..
312. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. & Mrs.
James Bernstein, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/23/93. P. 500658-500658.
313. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Stephen
& Ms. Colleen McKenna, re: Disapproval of EPA's "
preferred alternative, 7/23/93. P. 500659-500659.
314. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Richard
L. Ziegler, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/23/93. P. 500660-500660.
315. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Anne
Cranmer [sic], re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/23/93. P. 500661-500661.
316. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Florence
[sic] Thomas, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/23/93. P. 500662-500662".
317. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Dorothy
Morgan, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/23/93. P. 500663-500663.
55
-------
318. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Stephen
J. Scalia, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/23/93. P. 500664-500664.
./
319. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from A~ Noble and
D. Noble, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/23/93. P. 500665-500665.
320. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms.
Catherine M. Foley, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/23/93. P. 500666-500666.
f
321. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Claire &
Mr. Sam Schmick, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/23/93. P. 500667-500667.
322. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from (sender's
signature illegible), re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, 7/23/93. P. 500668-500668.
323. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Donald
J. DiPaslo, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/23/93. P. 500669-500669.
324. Letter to
. W. Murphy
P.C., re:
7/23/93.
Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Dr. Thomas
and Dr. Norman M. Shanfeld, Murphy-Shanfeld
Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,
P. 500670-500670.
325. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Charles
Berner, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/23/93. P. 500671-500671.
326. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. & Mrs. .
Poorman,. re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/23/93. P. 500672-500672.
327~ Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, fro~ Mr. John
Graham, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/23/93. P. 500673-500673.
328. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mrs. Betty
Zilius, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/23/93. P. 500674-500674.
329. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Carolyn
D. Loeliger, re: Qisapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/23/93. P. 500675-500675.
330. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from (sender's
signature illegible), re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, 7/23/93. P. 500676-500676.
56
....~:-:.
..
-------
. "
331. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms.
Christina Tabbert, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/23/93. P. 500677-500677. /.
332. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. John &
Ms. Marge Rossi, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/23/93. P. 500678-500678.
333. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Shankar
P. Barua and Ms. Lucille T. Fisher, re: Concern about
the radiation contamination problem, 7/23/93.
P. 500679-500679.
334. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Ms.
Florence K. Noll, re: Concern about the radiation
contamination problem, 7/23/93. P. 500680-500680.
335. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. George
'I'.~ "...---~-- --~ u- ,.......~"'-_..: -- u ~......~.tI!!!!It...... ......e.. n': e~'P\'P"\""'''""'''tr~ 1
... ~""~"""'II;;.. ".....\0,6 ....-. -....-..-......- .... _....~---, __a ----I:'~--"--
of EPA's preferred alternative, 7/23/93. P. 500681-
500681.
336. Letter to Ms. "Leanne Nurse, U. S. EPA, from Mr. Walter
and Ms. Florence Batog, re: D~sapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, 7/23/93. P. 500682-500682.
..
337. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.s. EPA, from
David D. and Ms. E. Susan Pollock, re: Concern
the radiation contamination problem, 7/23/93.
P. 500683-500683.
Mr.
about
338. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Susan
Hill, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,
7/23/93. P. 500684-500684.
339. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Margaret
M. Devaney, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/23/93. P. 500685-500685.
340. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Scott &
Ms. Mary Beth Olens, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, 7/23/93. P. 500686-500686.
341. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Gladys
M. Griffis, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/23/93. P. 500687-500687.
342. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Alicia
Lee Scott, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/23/93. P. 500688-500688.
57
-------
.
343. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. John G.
Kowalski, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/23/93. P. 500689-500689.
/,
344. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Jane D.
Sheeran, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred-
alternative, 7/23/93. P. 500690-500690.
345. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Wendy c.
Sheeran, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/23/93. P. 500691-500691.
.
346. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Sarah M.
Gilronan and Mr. James J. Gilronan, re: Disapproval of
EPA's preferred alternative, 7/23/93. P. 500692-
500692.
347. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Emily M.
Leonard and Mr. Matthew B. Leonard, re: Disapproval of
EPA's preferred alternative, 7/23/93. P. 500693-
500693. .
348. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Ellen
Marie Cassidy, re: Disapproval" of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/23/93. P. 500694-500694.
...
349. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Diane
Dibeli, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/23/93. .P. 500695-500695.
350. Letter to Ms. Leanne
E. Kleinberg and Ms.
Disapproval of EPA's
P. 500696-500696.
Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Norman
Margaret S. Kleinberg, re:
preferred alternative, 7/23/93.
351. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA,
Pollock and Ms. E. Susan Pollock, re:
. EPA's preferred alternative, 7/23/93.
500697. .
from Mr. David D.
Disapproval of
P. ~00697-
352. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Mary S.
Forrest, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/23/93. P. 500698-500698.
353. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Nicholas
F. Meloni and. Ms. Kathleen A. Meloni, re: Disapproval
of EPA's preferred alternative, 7/23/93. P. 500699-
500699. .
58
-------
354. Handwritten letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from
Ms.. Lucille K. Stickler, re: Comments on the issues
discussed at the public meeting, 7/23/93. P. 500700-
500701. /.,
355. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr: Chris P.
Felten, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/23/93. P. 500702-500702.
356. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Dorothy
A. Rice, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/26/93. P. 500703-500703.
.
357. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Ann M.
Boyd,_re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,
7/26/93. P. 500704-500704. .
358. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Carol
TT_~__..__...:I -~ . n'; e~""'P\"''''''.~ 1 ,.,..t: 'C'D~' e 'I"'\"...o-Fo..,..".o~
"''''...~w........,....,,,,,.., --. ----rl:"----- -- ---- - 1:"--------
alternative, 7/26/93. P. 500705-500705.
359. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mrs. Alice.
C. Borowik, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/26/93. P. 50070'6-500706. .
360. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Ms.
Dorothy A. Rice, re: Concern about the radiation
contamination problem, 7/26/93. P. 500707-500707.
361. Handwritten letter to The Honorable Robert P. Casey,
State of Pennsylvania, from Mr. Yousuf A. Haq, re:
Request for assistance with the cleanup of radium
contaminated properties and the reconstruction of
homes, 7/26/93. P. 500708~500709.
362. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Carol
Spelkoman, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/26/93. P. 500710-500710.
363. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Patricia
E. Kirlin and Mr. George G. Kirlin, re: Disapproval of
EPA's preferred alternative, 7/27/93. P. 500711-
500711.
364. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Mr.
George P. Kirlin and Ms. Patricia E. Kirlin, re:
Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative, 7/27/93.
P. 500712-500712.
365. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Florence.
Piazza, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/27/93. P. 500713-500713.
59
-------
366. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Mr. &
Mrs. Fred Canale, re: Concern about the radiation
contamination problem, 7/27/93. P. 500714-500714~,
367. Letter to Mr~ Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Mr. &
Mrs. G.A. Mossley, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/27/93. P. 500715-500715.
368. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Chris P.
Felten, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/27/93. P. 500716-500717.
. .
369. Letter to Ms. Leann [S1C] Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr.
Nashid Ali and The Collins-Ali Family, re: Concerns
about the value of life around the Austin Avenue
Radiation Site, 7/27/93. P. 500718-500720. A letter
to President Clinton regarding setting standards for
global cleanup and environmental protection is
attached.
370. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms.
Geraldine C. Laws, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/28/93. P. 500721-500721.
-
371. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Howard
. L. Haines, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/28/93. P. 500722-500722.
..
372. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Mr.
Howard L. Haines, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/28/93. P. 500723-500723.
373. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Ms.
Geraldine C. Laws, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferre~
alternative, 7/28/93. P. 500724-500724.
374. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Nashid
, Ali, re: Request for Superfund help to safely relocate
Mr. Ali and his family away from the site,' 7/28/93.'
P. 500725-500726.
375. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Dorothy
B. Ziegler, re: Request to be relocated as soon as
possible, 7/28/93. P. 500727-500727.
376: Letter to Ms.' Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from'Mr. Richard
and Ms. Marie Harbaugh, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, 7/29/93. P. 500728-500728.
377. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Thomas &
Ms. Susan Gross, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/29/93. P. 500729-500729.
60
-------
378. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. & Mrs.
James J. Doyle, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 7/30/93. P. 500730-500730.
. ./.
379. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Nashid
Ali, re: Comments on the proposed plan, 7/30/93. .
P. 500731-500732. -
380. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Audrey
Blue, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,
8/2/93. P. 500733-500733.
381. Letter to MS.tLeanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Emeralda
DiRenzo, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 8/4/93. P. 500734-500734.
382. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Emeralda
DiRenzo, re: Concern about the radiation contamination
problem, 8/4/93. P. 500735-500736.
383. Letter to The Honorable W. Curtis Weldon, House of
Representatives, from Mr. Michael F.X. ColI, re:
Issues surrounding the Lansdowne community, 8/5/93.
P. 500737-500738. .
..
384'. Letter to Mr. Stanley Loskowski [sic], U.S. EPA, from
Mr. Stephen E. Andrien, re: Questions concerning the
proposal for temporary housing, 8/6/93. P. 500739-
500745. A signed petition regarding the objection to
any and all expansion and/or addition to the business
currently operating and known as "Nova Gardens Inc." is
attached.
385. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Dr. Lenwood
B. Wert, re: Proof of health threats to the public
contained in the properties in Lansdowne, 8/6/93. .
P. 500746-500746.
386. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Thomas
F. Wynne, Jr., re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 8/7/93. P. 500747-500748.
387. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Susan
Keller, re: Concern about the radiation contamination
and EPA cleanup taking place,' 8/9/93. P. 500749-
500749.
388. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Barbara
Vinnacombe, re: Request for Option #3 to be made
available to all houses, 8/10/93. P. 500750-5'00750.
61
-------
.-
389. Meeting Minutes, 8/11/93. P. 500751-500756.
Attendance Register is attached.
An
/,
390. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Nancy
Powell and Mr. Gerald E. Connelly, re: Request to have
EPA reconstruct new homes, 8/20/93. P. 500757-500757.
391. Handwritten.letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from
Mr. Charles & Ms. Irene Rovane, re: Disapproval of
EPA's preferred alternative, 8/23/93. P. 500758-
500759.
392. Letter to Ms..Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. & Mrs.
J. Warren Bullen, Jr., re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, 8/24/93. P. 500760-500760.
393. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Ann
Marie Finn, Mr. Michael F. Finn, Ms. Winifred P. Finn,
and Ms. Kathleen Finn, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, 8/24/93. P. 500761-500761.
394. Letter to Ms. Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Joseph, Mr.
Kevin, and Ms. Barbara Quinn, ~e: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, 8/24/93. P. 500762-500762.
395'. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Harrison
W. App, re: Opposition to EPA's preferred alternative,
8/24/93. P. 500763-500763.
396. Letter to Ms.' Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Jeffrey
Miller, re: Request for Option #3 as an overall
solution to Lansdowne's radiation problem, 8/24/93.
. P. 500764-500764.
397. Handwritten letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from
Ms. Eileen Rudisill, re: Request for Option #3 as the
only viable option, 8/24/93. P. 500765-500765.
398. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA,: from Mr.
CUrt Weldon, Senator Arlen Specter, Senator Harris
Wofford, Mr. Thomas Foglietta, and Mr. Lucien
Blackwell, Congress of the United States, re: Comments
on the preferred options, 8/24/93. P. 500766-500768.
A letter regarding EPA's consideration of all comments
received is attached.
399. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Mark J.
Du Frayne and Ms. Rosemary Du Frayne, re: Disapproval
of EPA's preferred alternative, 8/25/93. P. 500769-
500770.
62
-------
4QO. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Joanne
and Mr. John Covert, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, 8/25/93. P. 500771-500771.
/..
401. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from F.D.
Hennessy, Jr., re: Disapproval of EPA's prefer~ed
alternative, 8/26/93. P. 500772-500772. -
402. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Eileen
A. Rudisill: re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 8/26/93. P. 500773-500773.
403. Letter to Ms. c Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Martin
J. Malone, Ms. Isabel-Lee Malone, and Ms. Isabel M.
Malone, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 8/26/93. P. 500774-500774.
404. Handwritten letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from
Mr. John & Ms. Gloria Carpenter, re: Request for homes
.a....- '-- ---'--_.!'- -.1:.--- ..1-- ~""''''' -,------.:- ---~--_..:I
'-\.I j.,JC J.CI.,,/Uo...,- ca.....,..... w..&.v ......~ '-..w«;;iLl,'&''''''l:' ...~ !:'_.""""...I.....,..w.,
8/26/93.
P. 500775-500775.
405. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from The
Committee for a Radium Free Delaware Valley, re:
Petitions gathered to support Option #3 for rebuildi~g ~
. homes, 8/26/93. P. 500776-500957. The petitions are
attached.
406. Letter to Mr. Victor Janosik, U.S. EPA, from Mr.
B. Barringer, re: Rejection of the proposal to
demolish houses without compensation, 8/27/93.
P. 500958-500958.
Lewin
407. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. George
N. Barton, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 8/27/93. P. 500959-500959.
408. Letter to"Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from" Ms. Mildred
" M. Missanelli, re: Disapproval of "EPA's preferred
alternative, 8/27/93. P. 500960-500960.
409. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mrs.
Patricia Bellwoar and Mr. Robert E. Bellwoar, re: List
of events in the Bellwoar's lives relating to the
radiation contamination, 8/29/93. P. 500961-500966.
410. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Maureen
J. Davis, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 9/2/93. P. 500967-500967.
63
-------
.
I
411. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Joseph &
Ms. Diane Bartley, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 9/8/93. P. 500968-500968. ~,
412. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. & Mrs.'
Kenneth M. Delcamp, re: Disapproval of EPA'S preferred
alternative, 9/8/93. P. 500969-500969.
413. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Ms.
Kristin Yoerg, re: Concern about the radiation
contamination problem, 9/8/93. P. 500970-500970.
. .
414. Letter to Ms. Leann~ Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Suzanne
G. Marti, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alteraative, 9/8/93. P. 500971-500971.
415. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. William
J. Soomio [sic], re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 9/9/93. P. 500972-500972.
416. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U. S. EPA,' from Ms. Patricia
Dean, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative~
9/9/93. P. 500973-500973.
417. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Bette
Lord, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,
9/9/93. P. 500974-500974.
..
418. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. BPA, from Ms. Mildred
Rogel, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,
9/9/93. P. 500975-500975. .
419. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. BPA, from Ms. Jessica
Weir, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,.
9/20/93. P. 500976-500976.
420. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. BPA, from Ms. Kathleen
L. Hammond, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 9/20/93. P. 500977-500977. .
421. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. BPA, from Ene L. .
Marzano, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 9/20/93. P. 500978-500978.
422. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. BPA, . from Mr. John
Hammond, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 9/20/~3. P. 500979-500979.
423. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. BPA, from Ms. .Mildred
Greenwood, William Penn School District, re: Support
for Option #3, 9/21/93. P. 500980-500980.
64
-------
424. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Kimberly
A. DeHaven, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 9/28/93. P. 500981-500981.
/,
425. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. John J.
Kelly, Sr., re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, 9/28/93. P. 500982-500982.
.
426. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mrs. John
Kelly, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,
9/28/93. P. 500983-500983.
.
427. Letter to Mr. Stanley L. Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Mr.
Robert P. Frank, Buchanan Ingersoll, re:
Recommendation of Option #3, 10/22/93. P. 500984-
500987. A letter regarding choosing Option #3 is
attached.
~~o. L=~~=L ~u ~~. 5~~lilcY ~. ~~~kvw~kl, v.~. ~~~,
Leon E. Kleckner and Ms. Agnes Kleckner, re:
Opposition to demolishing homes, {undated}.
P. 500988-500988.
~ -
~~urn ~~.
429. Letter to Ms. Leanne
J. Stanislow and Ms.
Disapproval to EPA's
P. 500989-500990.
Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Edward.
Jacqueline Stanislow, re:
preferred alternative, {undated}.
430. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Judith
R. Pearsall, re: Request to implement Option #3,
{undated}. P. 500991-500991.
431. Handwritten letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from
Ms. Barbara Lord, re: Questions on funding for
Lansdowne, {undated}. P. 500992-500992.
432. Handwritten letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from
Ms. Barbara J. Monroe, re: Disapproval of;EPA's
preferred alternative, {undated}. P. 500993-500994.
433. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms.
Catherine A. Vitti, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, {undated}. P. 500995-500996. A
handwritten letter regarding EPA's job of
. decontaminating the site is attached.
434. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Marianne
, Mercughano Glanzman, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, {undated}. P.,500997-500998.
Handwritten comments regarding EPA's' handling of the
cleanup are attached.
65
-------
435. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Joseph
P. McGuire, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 500999-501000.
/,
436. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mrs. Julie
R. Gardenir, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alter~ative, (undated). P. 501001-501001.
437. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Stephen
McManus, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501002-501002.
.
438. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Joseph
and Ms. Regina Milano, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501003-501003.
439~ Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. BPA, from Mr. Charlie
and Ms. Joan Lobb, re: Disapproval of BPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501004-501004.
440. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. BPA, from Mr. and Mrs.
Joseph Woolten, re: Disapproval of BPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 50~005-501005.
441. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. BPA, from Mr. Brie
Mark Roger, re: Disapproval of BPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501006-501006.
~
442. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. BPA, from Mr. Charles
and Ms. Diane Vallaw, re: Disapproval of BPA's
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501007-501007.
443. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. BPA, from Mr. Paul and
Ms. Debra Murtaugh, re: Disapproval of BPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501008-501008.
444. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. BPA, from Ms. Cora
. Anne Becker, re: Disapproval of BPA's pre~erred
alternative, (undated). P. 501009-501009.
445. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. BPA, from Mr. George
H. Becker, re: Disapproval of BPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501010-501010.
446. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. BPA, from Ms. Jane
Kahmer, re: Disapproval of BPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501011-501011.
447. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. BPA, from Mr. William.
A. and Ms. Joan M. Verna, re: Disapproval of BPA's
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501012-501012.
66
-------
448. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Anthony
M. Smith, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501013-501013.
/,
449. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. David
and Ms. Susan Pollock, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501014-501014.
450. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Phillip
D. Mattox, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501015-501015.
.
451. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms.
Elizabeth A. Rohr, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). .P. 501016-501016.
452. Letter to Ms. Lea~~e Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. and Mrs.
J.M. Cary, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
~l~~=~~~i7~, ~~~=~~~~) - P. =~1~17-5~~~~?
453. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, . from Mr. George
Snoke, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative, .
(undated). P. 501018-501018.
-
454. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Joseph
. P. Dick, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501019-501019.
455. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Loretta
G. Manning, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501020-501020.
456. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Julie
Rood, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,
(undated). P.501021-501021. .
457. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Susan
Baraldi, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferr~d
alternative, (undated). P. 501022-501022.'
458. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Irene
O'Brien, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501023-501023.
459. Letter to MS. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Chuck
and Ms. Laura. English, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501024-501024.
460. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Anne
Marie Tomosky, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501025-501025.
67
-------
461. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. George
J. Snoke, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501026-501026.
/.
462. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Richard
and Ms. Virginia Grulack, re: Disapproval of E?A's
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501027-501027."
463. Letter to M~. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Mary C.
Kelly, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,
(undated). P. 501028-501028.
464. Letter to ThecHonorable Harris Wofford, U.S. Senate,
from Ms. Catherine M. Snyder, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501029-501029.
465. Letter to The Honorable Harris Wofford, U.S. Senate,
from Mr. Joe and Ms. Kay Harris, re: Disapproval of
EPA's preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501030-
501030.
466. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Theresa
M. Little, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501031-501031.
467". Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U. S. EPA, from Ms. Lucy M.
Stewart, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501032-501032.
468. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Elaine
Fairwrathen, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501033-501033.
469. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Susan W.
Pearce, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501034-501034.
470. Letter to"Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Gregory
I. Aiello, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501035-501035.
471. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Ilona F.
Cannan, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501036-501036.
472. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Glenn B.
Jopplin, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undaEed). P. 501037-501037.
473. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Barbara"
J. Ford, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501038-501038.
68
-------
474. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Walter
and Ms. Lynne Miles, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501039-5010~9.
475. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Elliott
Borgman, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred -
alternative, (undated). P. 501040-501040.
476. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Georgia
B. Makiver, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501041-501041.
.
477. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. David R.
Harries, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501042-501042.
478. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Arthur
pavoni, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
c:LJ..'-t::.L.IJ.c:L'-~.V-c, \~ud.Qt..;~~. r. :;G:'~~~-:C1.C~~.
479. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA,' from Ms. Donna M.
O'Brien, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501944-501044.
480. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Nalan L.~
Vaughn, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501045-501045.
481. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Janus W.
Long, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,
(undated). P. 501046-501046.
482. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Anne
Pachelli, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501047-501047.
483. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Edna C.
. Calahan, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferr,d
alternative, (undated). P. 501048-501048.
484. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Andy and
Mrs. Ann Mary Mertow, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501049-501049.
485. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Bishop
Saloman H. Jones, Jr., re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternat~ve, (undated). P. 501050-501050.
486. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Edith
Rad [sic], re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501051-501051.
69
-------
487. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. and Mrs.
Hugh Meehan, re: Disapproval of BPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501052-501052.
/,
488. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from M~. Kathryn
A. Higgins, re: Cisapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501053-501053.
489. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. BPA, from Mr. Michael
J. Sapsis, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501054-501054.
.
490. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Roy G.
and Ms. Myrtle L. Wood, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501055-501055.
491. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. William
A. Hinder, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501056-501056.
492. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. James.
and Ms. Gertrude McCUllough, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501057-501057. .
493.. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Ann
McCullough, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501058-501058.
494. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Rowena
Dunbar, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred.
alternative, (undated). P. 501059-501059.
495. Letter to The Honorable Robert P. Casey, State of
Pennsylvania, from Mr. Joseph Schneberger, re: Concern
about the radiation contamination problem, (undated).'
P. 501060-501060.
496. Letter to The Honorable Robert P. Casey, State of
Pennsylvania, from Ms. Clara Schneberger, Ire: Concern
about the radiation contamination problem, (undated).
P. 501061-501061.
497. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Joseph
F. Schneberger, re: Disapproval of BPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501062-501062.
498. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from
McNamara and Ms. Rosemarie Richardson, re:
of EPA's preferred alternative, (undated).
501063.
Ms. Karen
Disapproval
P. 501063-
70
-------
499. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Karen
Augustine, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, {undated}. P. 501064-501064.
/.,
500. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms.
Elizabeth P. Gorman, re: Disapproval of EPA'-s
preferred alternative, {undated}. P. 501065-501065.
501. Letter to ~s. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Teresa
B. Ritti, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, {undated}. P. 501066-501066.
f
502. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Martin
L. and Ms. Rosy Mary H. McKelvey, re: Disapproval of
EPA's preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501067-
501067.
503. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Aukland
Z!.':'1"'I,:.rrn rt::;,..l - r,:.. n;CI~1"'I"""""''''''''' ",oF 14't):a'e ,.......""-F",,----,,,,~
---&;"---- .---... - -' ----1:"&:"'-_._- -- ---- - 1:'--------
alternative, (undated). P. 501068-501068.
504. Letter.to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Dorothy
McBride, re: . Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alte~ative, (undated). P. 501069-501069.
505-. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Margaret
M. Carley, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501070-501070.
506. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Joseph
M. Biebel, Jr., re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501071-501071.
507. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Roberta
C. Eisenburg, re: Disapproval. of EPA's preferred.
alternative, (undated). P. 501072-501072.
508~ Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, fro~ Ms. Vivian
Greene, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501073-501073.
509. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Robert
and Ms. Maureen Litiorniec, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, {undated}. P. 501074-501074.
510. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Frances
Baselise, re: Dis~pproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501075-501075.
511. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Louis W.'
Schonder, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501076-501076.
71
-------
512. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. George
E. Toyoun, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501077-501077.
;'
513. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. E.J.
Mueller, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501078-501078.
514. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Lorraine
Dundee, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501079-501079.
.
515. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. William
Din [sic], re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501080-501080.
516. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Samuel
Bordarr, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501081-501081.
517. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Claude
E. Campbell, Jr., re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501082-501082.
-
518. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. and Mrs.~
Joseph Varrello, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501083-501083.
519. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Charles
and Ms. Patricia Lausch, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501084-501084.
520. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Armand
and Ms. Jean Rienzo, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501085-501085.
521. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Violet
. M. Weimer, re: Disapproval of EPA's prefe~red
alternative, (undated). P. 501086-501086.
522. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from (sender's
signature illegible), re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501087-501087.
523. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Judith
White, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,
(undated). P. 501Q88-501088.
524. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from The Roths,
re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,
(undated). P. 501089-501089.
72
-------
525. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. and Mrs.
Michael Hiezler, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501090-501090.
/.
526. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. David'
Laun, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alterpative,
(undated). P. 501091-501091.
527. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. and Mrs.
Ashton L. Townaby, re: Disapproval. of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501092-501092.
528. Letter to Ms. ~Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. William
D. Ziegler, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501093-501093.
529. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Karen
McGuire, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501094-501094.
53'0. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U. S. EPA,. from Ms. Theresa
McGuire, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501095-501095.
531. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. and Mrs.~
Donald W. DiSarro, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501096-501096.
532. Letter .to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mrs. Ethel
S. Kirchman, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501097-501097.
533. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Dr. Robert
S. Martin, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501098-501098.
534. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from.Mr. Samuel
. F. Rossi, 're: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501099-501099.;
535. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Carole
J. Leming, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501100-501100.
536. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Mark
Costigan, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501101-501101.
537. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA,. from Mr. Andrew
and Ms. Margaret Endoy, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501102-501102.
73
-------
538. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. W.S.
McDermond, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated).' P. 501103-501103.
./
539. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. and Mrs.
Charles F. Hughes, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501104-501104.
540. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Nicole
C. Hudson, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501105-501105.
.
541. Letter to The Honorable Robert C. Casey, State of
Pennsylvania, from Ms. Nicole C. Hudson, re: Concern
abou~the radiation contamination problem, (undated).
P. 501106-501106.
542. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Marie A.
McCloskey, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501107-50'11.07.
543. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. James J.
and Ms. Ethel' George, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 5011.08-5011.08.-
544. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Frances
Belk, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,
(undated). P. 501.1.09-501.1.09.
545. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Ruth M.
. Sheckler, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 5011.1.0-501.1.1.0.
546. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. .
Josephine M. Coyle, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501.1.1.1.-501.1.1.1..
547. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Jessica
McGuire, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501.1.1.2-501.1.1.2.
548. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Linda S.
Poch, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,
(undated). P. 5011.13-501.1.1.3.
549. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. T.H.
Brittingham, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 5011.1.4-501.1.14.
550. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Warren
and Ms. Jane Lisner, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 5011.15-5011.15.
74
-------
5~1. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Robert
G. Faulkner, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501116-501116. /-
552. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. C.W.
Kunkel, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred -
alternative, (undated). P. 501117-501117.
553. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Margaret
T. Boyle, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501118-501118.
.
554. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Robert
J. Mayer, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501119-501119.
555. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Peter J.
Capper, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501120-501120.
l
55-6. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U. S. EPA, - from Ms. Gloria
M. Daugherty, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501121-501121.
557. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, u.S. EPA, from Mr.
- George Srobe, re: Concern about the radiation
contamination problem, (undated). P. 501122-501i22.
558. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Loretta
M. BYrne, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501123-501123.
559. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Eugene
P. Usavage, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501124-501124.
560. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Virgina
- Cullen, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501125-501125:
561. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Dale
John Stetz, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501126-501126.
562. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. William
J. Savage, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501127-501127.
563. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Robert
J. Palmer, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501128-501128.
75
-------
. - -- ....
"""- -
564. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. BPA, from Mr. Robert
Dye, re: Disapproval of BPA's preferred alternative,
(undated). P. 501129-501129. .".
565. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. BPA, from Ms. Marie
Vilardi, re: Disapproval of BPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501130-501130.
566. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. BPA, from Ms. Ruth V.
Ziegler, re: Disapproval of BPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501131-501131.
.
567. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. John
Pryybjla [sic], re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501132-501132.
568. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Charles
Zepka, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,
(undated). P. 501133-501133.
569. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Michael
D. and Ms. Elizabeth M. Denk, re: Disapproval of EPA':.s
preferred alternative, (undated). P.501134-501134. ;
570. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Roger-V.~
. Tulls, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,
(undated). P. 501135-501135.
571. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Dorothy
Hussler, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501136-501136.
572. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U..S. EPA, from Mr. Kenneth
M. Delcamp, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501137-501137.
573. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr.
. Ferdinand G. Grippo, re: Disapproval of ErA's
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501138-501138.
574. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Charlie
Hamper, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501139-501139.
575. Letter to Ms.. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Glen
Malott, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (unda~ed). P. 501140-501140.
576. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from D. &'M.
Paulay, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501141-501141.
76
-------
577. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Jeanne
Roujensla, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501142-501142.
/
578. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Coni C.
Myer, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,
(undated). P. 501143-501143.
579. Letter to MS. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Michael
J. and Ms. Elizabeth M. Sheils, re: Disapproval of
EPA's preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501144-
501144.
580. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. and Mrs.
C.E. Colleus, Jr., re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501145-501145.
581. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Carol
2)./",/",::am::annn T.11Ca.S. re: Disa.nnrcva.l of EPA's preferred
ait~rnative, (undated). P:-501146-501146.
582. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. William
Thomas, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501147-501147.
583-. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U. S. EPA, from Mr. and Mrs.
C. C. Mershon," re: Disapproval of EPA' s preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501148-501148.
584. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Vincent
" P.M. Berry, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501149-501149.
585. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Debra S.
Weeks, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,
(undated). P. 501150-501150.
586 - Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from, Mr. Benj'amin
and Ms. Janet Van Renoler, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501151-501151."
587. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Cecilia
C. Kenny, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501152-501152.
588. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Miram E.
Manus, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,
(undated). P. 501153-501153.
589. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Justin
C. Sweeny, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501154-501154.
77
-------
590. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA from Mr. Richard
J. Daisley, re: Disapproval of EPA'~ preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501155-501155.
/.
591. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Susan K.
Prager, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501156-501156.
592. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Florence
H. Noll, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501157-501157.
.
593. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. and Mrs.
K. Springer, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501158-501158.
594. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. George
F. Bell, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501159-501159.
595. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Al and.
Ms. Margaret Bodnar,re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501160-501160.
596. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. James
. DeVita, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501161-501161.
~
597. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. John M.
and Mary M. Guidera, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501162-501162.
598. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Joe G.
and Ms. Kathryn M. Ryan, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501163-501163.
599. Letter to.Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Ed
. Stumir, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
. alternative, (undated). P. 501164~501164.'
600. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Ellen
Cassidy, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (~dated). P. 501165-501165.
601. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms.
Charlotte S. Parchall, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternat~ve, (undated). P.501166-501166.
602. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Darrell
Bat, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,
(undated). P. 501167-501167.
78
-------
60~. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Mr.
Mark and Ms. Amanda Milewski, re: Concern about the
radiation contamination problem, (undated). P. 501168-
501168. /.-
604. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Mr.
Robert E. Dougal, re: Concern about the radiation
contamination problem, (undated). P. 501169-501169.
605. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Mr.
John Waldron, re: Concern about the radiation
contamination problem, (undated). P. 501170-501170.
f
606. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Mr.
Willi~m J. Walls, re: Concern about the radiation
contamination problem, (undated). P. 501171-501171.
607. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Ms.
Mary Ann Walls, re: Concern about the radiation
contamination proclem, (unaa~eaj. ~. 5ull7~-50llI2.
608. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Ms.
Tina Harris, re: Concern about the radiation
contamination problem, (undated). P. 501173-501173. - :
609. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Mr.
Eugene L. Smith, re: Concern about the radiation
contamination problem, (undated). P. 501174-501174.
610. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Ms.
Karen F. Stoney, re: Concern about the radiation
contamination problem, (undated). P. 501175-501175.
611. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Ms.
Carol Maby, re: Concern about the radiation
contamination problem, (undated). P. 501176-501176.
612. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Ms.
Molly Malone-Munsell, Ms. Isabell Lee, Mr.;Martin J.,
and Ms. Isabel M. Malone, re: Concern about the
radiation contamination problem, (undated). P. 501177-
501177.
613. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski,
James and Ms. Sarah Brennan, re:
radiation contamination problem,
501178.
u.S. EPA, from Mr.
Concern about the
(undated). P. 501178-
614. Letter to The Honorable Robert P. Casey, State of
Pennsylvania, from Mr. and Mrs. Oliver J. and Ms. Kelly.
Jean McCarron, re: Concern about the radiation
contamination problem, (undated). P. 501179-501179.
79
-------
615. Letter to ~he Honorable Robert P. Casey, State of
Pennsylvan~a, from Ms. Catherine Du Frayne, re:
Concern about the radiation contamination problem;,
(undated). P. 501180-501180.
616. Letter to The Honorable Robert P. Casey, State of
Pennsylvania, from Ms. Sarah J. Baldwin, re: Concern
about the radiation contamination problem, (undated).
P. 501181-501181.
617. Letter to The Honorable Robert P. Casey, State of
Pennsylvania, from Ms. Jane Masterson, re: Concern
about the radIation contamination problem, (undated).
P. 501182-501182. .
618. Letter to The Honorable Robert P. Casey, State of
Pennsylvania, from (sender's signature illegible), re:
Concern about the radiation contamination problem,
(undated). P. 501183-501183.
619. Letter from Mr. Tom and Ms. Catherine Burke, re:
Concern about the radiation contamination problem,
(undated). P. 501184-501184.
620. Letter to The Honorable Robert P. Casey, State of
Pennsylvania, from Mr. Christopher Du Frayne, re:
Concern about the radiation contamination problem,
(undated). P. 501185-501185.
~
621. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Ms.
Emeralda DiRenzo, re: Concern about the radiation
contamination problem, (undated). . P. 501186-501187.
622. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Dr.
Wilma Mitchell, re: Concern about the radiation
contamination problem, (undated). P. 501188-501188.
.623,
Letter to The Honorable Robert P. Casey, S~ate of
Pennsylvania, from Ms. Dora Schultz, re: toncern
the radiation contamination.problem, (undated).
P. 501189-501189.
about
624. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Mr.
Michael Bradley, re: Concern about the radiation
contaminatio~ problem, (undated). P. 501190-501190.
625. Letter to The Honorable Robert P. Casey, State of
Pennsylvania, from 'Ms. Irene Tappi, re: Concern about
the radiation contamination problem, (undated).
P. 501191-501191.
80
-------
626. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Ms.
Margaret A. Zentmyer, re: Concern about the radiation
contamination problem, (undated). P. 501192-5011~~.
627. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Ms.
Carolyn I. Mooney, re: Concern about the radiation
contamination problem, (undated). P. 501193-501193.
628. Letter to The Honorable Robert P. Casey, State of
Pennsylvania, from Mr. Myron E. Jeffkin, re: Concern
about the radiation contamination problem, (undated).
P. 501194-501194.
.
629. 'Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Mr.
Peter B. Markman, re: Concern about the radiation
contamination problem, (undated). P. 501195-501195.
630. Letter to The Honorable Robert P. Casey, State of
pennsvlvania. from Ms. Bettv Smith. re: Concern about
the radiation contamination-problem, (undated).
P. 501196-501196. '
631. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Mr.
Edward R. Stewart, re: Concern about the radiation
contamination problem, (undated). P. 501197-501197.
632. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Mr.
Bruce P. Laryor and Ms. Victoria A. Mott, re: Concern
about the radiation contamination problem, (undated).
P. 501198-501198.
633. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Mr. and
Mrs. Charles R. Simmonds, re: Concern about the
radiation contamination problem, (undated). P. 501199-
501199. .
634. Letter to
Thomas J.
radiation
501200.
Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Mr.
and Ms. Joan O'Brien, re: Concern about the
contamination problem, (undated) '. P. 501200-
635. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Ms.
Anna R. Warren, re: Concern about the radiation
contamination problem, (undated). P. 501201-501201.
636. Letter to 'Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Ms.
LYnn Ronolini, re: Concern about the radiation
contamination problem, (undated). P. 501202-501202.
81
-------
~.. :.'..-..
637. Letter to
Louis and
radiation
501203.
Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Mr.
Ms. Linda Massari, re: Concern about the
contamination problem, (undated). P. 591203-
638. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Mr.
Dennis H. McErlean, re: Concern about the radiation
contaminatiQn problem, (undated). P. 501204-501204.
639. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Ms.
Ruth M. Palm, re: Concern about the radiation
contamination problem, (undated). P. 501205-501205.
~
640. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Mr.
Eugene P. Usavage, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501206-501206.
641. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Mr.
Dougals L. Hall, re: Concern about the radiation
contamination problem, (undated). P. 501207-501207.
642. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski,
James F. and Ms. Rose Shirk, r~:
radiation contamination problem,
501208.
U.S. EPA, from Mr.
Concern about the.
(undated). P. 5012Q8-
..
643. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Ms.
Ruth H. Flannery, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501209-501209.
644. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from T.H.
Brittingham, re: Concern about the radiation
contamination problem, (undated). P. 501210-501210.
645. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Mr.
Walter and Ms. Florence Batog, re: Concern about the
radiation contamination problem, (undated). P. 501211-
501211.
646. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Mr.
Leon E. and Ms. Agnes Kleckner, re: Concern about the
radiation contamination problem, (undated). P. 501212-
501212.
647. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Mr.
William T. Reagel, re: Concern about the radiation
contamination problem,. (undated). P. 501213-501213.
648. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Mr.
Robert M. Boucher, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred.
alternative, (undated). P. 501214-501214.
82
-------
649. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, u.S. EPA, from Ms.
Karen Aulisniewski, re: Concern about the radiation
contamination problem, (undated). P. 501215-501215.
650. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, u.S. EPA, from Ms.
Virginia S. Rank, re: Concern about the radiation
contamination problem, (undated). P. 501216-501216.
651. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Mr.
George and Ms. Katherine Chronaker, re: Concern about
the radiation contamination problem, (undated).
P. 501217-501J17.
652. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, u.S. EPA, from Mr.
George and Ms. Katherine Chronaker, re: Disapproval of
EPA's preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501218-
501218.
653. Letter to Mr- Stanley Laskow~k;; ~-B- BPA; f~~~ M~-
Ruth H. Flannery, re: Concern about the radiation
contamination problem, (undated). P. "501219-501219.
654. Letter to The Honorable Harris ~offord, U. S. Senate, ""
from Mr. Dennis H. McErlean, re: Disapproval of EPA~s
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501220-501220. ~
655. Letter to The Honorable Robert P. Casey,. State of
Pennsylvania, from Ms. Catherine V. Ireland, re:
Concern about the radiation contamination problem,
(undated). P. 501221-501221.
656. Letter to The Honorable Robert P. Casey, State of
Pennsylvania, from Mr. James Lucas, re: -Concern about
the radiation contamination problem, (undated).
P. 501222-501222.
657. Letter to. The Honorable Robert P. Casey, State of
- Pennsylvania, from Ms. Josephine Caulfield~ re:
Concern about the radiation contamination problem,
(undated). P. 501223-501223~
658. Letter to The Honorable Robert P. Casey, State of
Pennsylvania, from Mr. Charles Hampton, re: Concern
about the radiation contamination problem, (undated).
P. 501224-501224.
659. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Douglas
L. Hall, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501225-501225.
83
-------
660. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Cynthia
H. De Conti, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501226-501226. /.
661. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. and Mrs.
James McCarey, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501227-501227.
662. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. and Mrs.
J. Westfield, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501228-501228.
.
663. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Joseph
Westfield, Jr., re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alte~ative, (undated). P. 501229-501229.
664. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Steven
M. Casale, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501230-501230.
665. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA,' from Brother
William R. Rohner, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, {undated). P. 501231-501231.
666. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Brother
. Kevin McManus, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501232-501232.
..
667. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Robert
R. Wilsbach, Jr., re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501233-501233.
668. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Richard
Buccina, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501234-501234.
669. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Paul R.
. Yuzuk, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred,alternative,
. (undated). P. 501235-501235. .
670. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. John J.
McDonnell, Jr., re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501236-501236.
671. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Kevin M.
Stanten, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501237-501237.
672. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. John S.
Lyon, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,
(undated). P. 501238-501238.
84
-------
.
673. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mrs. Deborah
Davis, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,
(undated). P. 501239-501239. /.,
674. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Reverend
Joseph F. Gleason, re: Disapproval of EPA's-preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501240-501240.
675. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Darlene
Boyner, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501241-501241.
c
676. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Mildred
L. Brooks, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501242-501242. .
677. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Shaun A.
Aberatti, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501243-501243.
678. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA,. from Ms.
Geraldine Gooden, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501244-501244.
-
679. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Richard ~
. W. Breese, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501245-501245.
680. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, u.S. EPA, from Mr. Earl R.
Chlul [sic], .re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501246-501246.
681. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. William
Gualli, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501247-501247.
682. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Michael
. A. Pazzuob [sic], re: Disapproval of EPA'$ preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501248-501248.'
683. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, u.s. EPA, from Ms. Rochelle
L. Hoyt, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501249-501249.
684, Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms.
Catherine Kelly, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501250-501250.
685. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Maria M.
Oresbonick, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501251-501251.
85
-------
686. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA,_from Mr. George
P. Martin, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501252-501252."
/,
687. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from M~. Roberta
Martin, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501253-501253.
688. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. John
Waldron, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501254-501254.
" .
689. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. John C.
Waldron, Jr., re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501255-501255.
690. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. John C.
Waldron; re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501256-501256.
69~. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U. S. EPA," from Ms.
Catherine Franklin, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501257-501257.
-
692. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse~ U.S. EPA, from Ms. Barbara ~
Marznet, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501258-501258.
693. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Stuart
Chiff, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,
(undated). P. 501259-501259.
694. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Robert
S. Moore, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501260-501260.
695. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from" Mr. B.J.
Chinofsky, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501261-501261.'"
696. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Pamela
Deary, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,
(undated). P. 501262-501262.
697. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Katie
Dowdell, re:" Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (unda~ed). P. 501263-501263.
698. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Clare
Deary, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,"
(undated). P. 501264-501264.
86
-------
699. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. R.J.
Deary, Sr., re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501265-501265.
/,
700. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Robert
J. Deary, Jr., re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501266-501266.
701. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Charles
Carli, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,
(undated). P. 501267-501267.
f
702. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Robert
P. Whitney, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501268-501268.
703. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Victor
E. Tenaglin, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
;::.1 t"A.,..,.,;::.t";U'A t",.,A;::.t"AA\ 1) c;n, ?~Q-c;n' ?~Q
- - - - - - -- ~ - - . -,
.--------6 -
-- ------ ------.
704. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA,' from Mr. Bennet..
D. Kitts, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 50~270-501270.
705. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from (sender's
signature illegible), re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501271-501271.
706. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Kenneth
S. Weyler, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred.
alternative, (undated). P. 501272-501272.
707. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Damon
Levy, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,.
(undated). P. 501273-50~273.
708. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Matthew
Madden, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferre~
alternative, (undated). P. 501274-501274.
709. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. H.
Nelson Jacobs, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501275-501275.
710. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from M.
Bellantine, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (unda~ed). P. 501276-501276.
711. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Harry B.
Montgomery, re: Disapproval of. EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501277-501277.
87
-------
.
712. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Thomas
Pesses [sic], re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501278-501278. .
'"
713. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Dr. Edgar
Hampton, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred - .
alternative, (undated). P. 501279-501279.
714. Letter to MS. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. David
Clare, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,
(undated). P. 501280-501280.
715. Letter to Ms. 1Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Jan K.
Clark, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,
(undated). P. 501281-501281.
716. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. David
Jeff, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,
(undated). P. 501282-501282.
717. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA,' from (sender's
signature illegible), re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501283-501283.
718. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Linda'A.~
. Salotti, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501284-501284.
719. Letter to Ms. Leanne ~urse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Thomas
Clurge, re: Qisapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501285-501285.
720. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from (sender's
signature illegible), re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501286-501286.
721. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Donna
. Natto, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred, alternative,
(undated). P. 501287-501287. . .
722. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Philip
Sejlin, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501288-501288.
723. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Kenneth
R. Shoop, re:. Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501289-501289.
724. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U;S. EPA, from Mr. Richard
Kauf, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,
(undated). P. 501290-501290.
88
-------
725. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. William
B. Waldren, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501291-501291. /
726. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Don
Sullivan, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred-
alternative, (undated). P. 501292-501292.
727. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Jerald
Shace, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,
(undated). P. 501293-501293.
.
728. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Kenneth
and Ms. Patrice Wright, re: Disapproval of EPA's
prefecred alternative, (undated). P. 501294-501294.
729. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms.
Katherine C. Dunningten, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501295-501295.
730. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA," from Mr. Rocco
Rinaldi, Jr., re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501296-501296.
731. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. John E. ...
McEvoy, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501297-501297.
732. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. John and
Ms. Marylin Delessandro, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501298-501298.
733. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Lance
Gustiano, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501299-501299.
734. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. M.
" Baldassane, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501300-501300.
735. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Jessica
C. Blair, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501301-501301.
736. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Joseph
H. Wentz, re:" Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501302-501302.
737. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from K. Longrgan,
re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,
(undated). P. 501303-501303.
89
-------
738. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Phyllis
A. St. Louis, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501304-501304. /.
739. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Mark Du
Frayne, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501305-501305.
740. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. William
and Ms. Bettie Belkington, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501306-501306'.
.
741. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms.
Jacqueline Calhoun, re: ' Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501307-501307.
742. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms.
Catherine Binck, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501308-501308.
743. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Anne M.
Farrell, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501309-501309.
744. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Joseph
. W. Farrell, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501310-501310.
..
745. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. John C.
Byrne, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,
(undated). P. 501311-501311.
746. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Joan D.
Byrne, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,
(undated). P. 501312-501312.
747. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Jeanne
, Royaski, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501313-501313:
748. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from (sender's
signature illegible), re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501314-501314.
749. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. William
. E. Greed, rei Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501315-501315.
750. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms.
Charlotte Sanders, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred'
alternative, (undated). P. 501316-501316.
90
-------
751. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Robert
and Ms. Susan Hart, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501317-501317. /
752. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. John M.
Guiernan, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501318-501318.
753. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.s. EPA, from Mr. Daniel
T. Coughlin, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501319-501319.
. .
754. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.s. EPA, from Mr. and Mrs.
Mornay Reganat, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501320-501320.
755. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.s. EPA, from Mr. James
Keenan, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501321-501321.
756. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, u.s. EPA,. from Ms. Marjorie
D. Ranch, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501322-501322.
757. Letter to Ms.. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms.
Catherine M. Fitzpatrick, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative,. (undated). P. 501323-501323.
758. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.s. EPA, from Mr. John and
Ms. Jennifer Parisier, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501324-501324.
759. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.s. EPA, from Mr. Hugh and
Ms. Anna McBride, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred.
alternative, (undated). P. 501325-501325.
760. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Cynthia
- O'Donnell, re: Disapproval of EPA's prefefred
alternative, (undated). P. 501326-501326.
761. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.s. EPA, from Ms. Judith
A. McDir, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501327-501327.
762. Letter to Ms.-Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. David
Campbell, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (unda~ed). P. 501328-501328.
763. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Marylin
R. Campbell, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501329-501329.
91
-------
-
764. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Gary
prosalow, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. S01330-S01330.
/,
765. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Eileen
Brown, reo Disapproval of EPA'S preferred alternative,
(undated). P. S01331-S01331.
766. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mrs. Annie
R. Johnson, reo Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. S01332-S01332.
of
767. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Elmer
and Ms. Doris E. Ralston, reo Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501333-501333.
768. Letter to Ms. Leanne NUrse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Karen
Aulianiewski, reo Disapproval of EPA'S preferred
alternative, (undated). P. S01334-S01334.
769. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Myron E.
Jeffkin, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. SO~33S-501335.
-
770. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Robert
E. Dougal, reo Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. S01336-S01336.
771. Letter to Ms. Leanne NUrse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. James
and Ms. Mary saldron, reo Disapproval of EPA'S
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501337-501337.
772. Letter to Ms. Leanne NUrse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. and MrS.
Thomas J. CossentinO, reo Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501338-501338.
773. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Donald
J. Ennis, re: Disapproval of EPA' s preferred
alternative, (undated). P.501339-501339:
774. Letter to MS. Leanne NUrse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Edna
Taylor, re: Disapproval of EPA' s preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501340-501340.
775. Letter to Ms. Leanne NUrse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Estelle
R. wiseley, reo Disapproval of EPA'S preferred
alternative, (unda~ed). P. 501341-501341.
776. Letter to Ms. Leanne NUrse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. James J.
Garber, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501342-501342.
92
-------
:-
777. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mrs. Marie
B. Rodgers, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501343-501343.
.; .'
778. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Richard
Henne, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,
(undated). P. 501344-501344.
.
779. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms.
Katherine R. Shegog, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501345-501345.
.
780. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Stephen
and Ms. patricia pogge, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501346-501346.
781. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Carol A.
Plichter, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501347-501347.
782. Let ter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U. S . EPA,' from Ms. Anna H.
Piselli, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 50~348-501348.
783. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. and Mrs.~
Edward J. Arena, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501349-501349.
784. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Margaret
Hampton, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501350-501350.'
785. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, frqm Ms. Patricia
McCauley, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501351-501351.
786. Letter to. Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from' Mr. David A.
. Biche, CUstom Construction, re: Disapprov?l of EPA's
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501352~501352.
787. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Louis J.
Rufo and Miss Rita D. Rufo, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501353-501353.
788. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mrs. Lora
McEvoy, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (unda~ed). P. 501354-501354.
789. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms'. Jane A.
Hibbler, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501355-501355.
93
-------
790. Letter to Mr. Stanley Laskowski, U.S. EPA, from Mr.
Charles Procal, re: Concern about the radiation
contamination problem, (undated). P. 501356-5013S6.
791. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Ypusuf
A. and Ms. Linda Haq, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501357-501357.
792. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms.
Elizabeth M. Pederson, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501358-501358.
793. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. and Mrs.
Fred Canale, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501359-501359.
794. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from J.S. Pappas
and Ms. Karen Pappas, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501360-501360.
795. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Jack and
Ms. Mary Markle, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501361-501361.
796. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Frank L.'
George, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501362-501362.
797. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. and Mrs.
Donaberger, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501363-501363.
798. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Vincent
and Ms. Rosarine M. Grisafi, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501364-501364.
799. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Kathleen
Hetherington, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501365-501365.
800. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Carol
McCarry, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501366-501366.
801. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Robert
A. Runyen, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501367-501367.
802. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. L.
William A. Sopko, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501368-501368.
94
-------
803. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. JoAnn M.
Sopko, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,
(undated). P. 501369-501369.
./,
804. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Mary Lou
Walchak, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred-
alternative, (undated). P. 501370-501370.
805. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Louis R.
Walchak, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501371-501371.
806. Letter to Ms. -Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Carolyn
Stighonsly, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501372-501372.
807. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. and Mrs.
Thomas J. Williams, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501373-501373.
80'8. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U. S. EPA,. from Mr. George
Davis, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,
(undated). P. 501374-501374.
809. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mrs. Jude-D.~
O'Shea, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, . (undated). P. 501375-501375.
810. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mrs. A.R.
Bohl, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,
(undated). P. 501376-501376.
811. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. John
Schiller, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501377-501377.
812. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Barbara
. Edwards, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501378-501378.;
813. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Virginia
S. Huntsinger, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501379-501379.
814. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. William
. R. Bold, re:. Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501380-501380.
815. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. George
Kington III, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative,' (undated). P. 501381-501381.
95
-------
. -.--.
816. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Joseph
O. and Ms. Susanna M. Kirlin, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501382-5013~2.
817. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Nancy
Halpin, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred -
alternative, (undated). P. 501383-501383.
.
818. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Colin
and Ms. Mary Crawford, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501384-501384.
819. Letter to Ms. fLeanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. and Mrs.
Mahoney, re: Disapproval of EPA's-preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501385-501385.
820. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Scott
Franklin, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501386-501386.
821. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA," from Mr. John and
Ms. Maryrae Schiller, re: Disapproval of EPA's "
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501387-501387.
822. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Barbara ~
J. Maun, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501388-501388.
823. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Janice
M. Rothbone, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501389-501389.
824. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms.
Catherine De Burke, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P.501390-501390. "
" "
825. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from" Mr. Thomas'
" and Ms. Kathleen Moran, re: Disapproval o~ EPA' s .
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501391~501391.
826. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Jules De
Burke, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,
(undated). P. 501392-501392.
827. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Richard
J. and Ms. Beverly A. Mathis, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501393-501393.
828. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mrs.. Phillip
Marsh, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,"
(undated). P. 501394-501394. "
96
-------
.
829. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mrs. Marge
Augustine, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501395-501395.,
/
830. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mrs. Berta
Wraughn, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred-
alternative, (undated). P. 501396-501396.
831. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Timothy
P. Saunders and Family, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501397-501397.
832. Letter to Ms. fLeanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Susan M.
DiParlo, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501398-501398.
833. Letter toMs. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Lou and
Ms. Katharine Farese, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501399-501399.
83'4. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA" from Mr. Walter
and Ms. Mary Merrill, re: Disapproval of EPA's .
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501400-501400.
835. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Yvonne
H. Adams, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501401-501401.
..
836. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. and Mrs.
William Aune, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, '(undated). P. 501402-501402.
837. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Edward
W. and Ms. Viola M. Cox, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501403-501403.
838. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Holland
M. Cerbs, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferFed
alternative, (undated). P. 501404-501404. t'
839. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. and Mrs.
Marshall Aforius [sic], re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501405-501405.
840. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Suzanne
L. Pinto, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated)., P. 501406-501406.
841. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U. S . EPA, from Mr. ,Stephen
and Ms. Colleen McKenna, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501407-501407.
97
-------
842. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, . from Ms. Maria
Griffin, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501408-501408.
./
843. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. and Mrs.
George Morella, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501409-501409.
844. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Paul and
Ms. Alice Stouffer, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative,. (undated). P. 501410-501410.
t
845. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. and Mrs.
Bruno Buir, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501411-501411.
846. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Clotilda
Cappelli, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501412-501412.
847. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA,from Ms. Eileen
Brown, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,
(undated). P. 501413-501413.
848. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Dennis
and Ms. Christine Dumagay, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501414-501414.
..
849. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. John R.
Adcock, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501415-501415.
850. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Louis
and Ms. Linda Masseri, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501416-501416.
851. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Ruth H.
. Flannery, . re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501417~501417.'
852. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Ruth H.
Flannery, re: Concern about the radiation
contamination problem, (undated). P. 501418-501418.
853. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Nancy
Catallo, re: . Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501419-501419.
854. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Tom and
Ms. Ann Antonelli, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred.
alternative, (undated). P. 501420-501420.
98
-------
.
855. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Suzanne
H. Smart, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501421-501421.
/,
856. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. and Mrs.
Fred Canale, re: bisapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501422-501422.
857. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Lindsay
S. Crosby, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501423-501423.
.
858. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Denise
T. Jones, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alte~native, (undated). P. 501424-501424.
859. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. William
Davis, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,
(undated). P. 501425-501425.
. '
860. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA,' from Mr. James F.
and Ms. Rose L.' Shirk, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501426-501426.
861. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Rachel
. Evans, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred alternative,
(undated). P. 501427-501427.
862. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Dorothy
S. Carberry, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501428-501428.
863. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from (sender's
signature illegible), re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501429-501429.
864. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Anna R.
, Warren, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferre~
alternative, (undated). P. 501430-501430.'
865. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Frank
Glorard, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501431-501431.
866. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U. S. EPA,' from Mr. John
Slatheny, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501432-501432.
867. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. George
and Ms. Ruth Landevehr, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501433-501433.
99
-------
868. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Robert
and Ms. Elizabeth Powell, re: Disapproval of EPA's
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501434-501434.
/.,
869. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U. S . BPA, from Mr. and Mrs-. -
William Koskiner, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501435-501435.
870. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Lance
Founew, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501436-501436.
871. Letter to Ms. .Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. John R.
Schiller, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501437-501437.
872. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Michael G.
O'Mossey, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501438-501438.
873. Let ter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U. S . EPA,. from Mr. Joseph
J. and Ms. Catherine A. Lawless, re: Disapproval of
EPA's preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501439-
501439.
~
874. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mrs. Frances
K. Spence, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501440-501440.
875. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Al and
Ms. Amy Tielmans, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501441.-501441.
876. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Charles'
W. Glotfelty, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501442-501442.
.877. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Margaret
Mullery, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501443-501443.
878. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. Robert
E. and Ms. Elizabeth L. Brumbaugh, re: Disapproval of
EPA's preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501444-
501444.
879. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Mary
Gouse, re: Disapp~oval of EPA's preferred alternative,
(undated). P. 501445-501445.
100
-------
8~0. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. William
J. Dyle, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501446-501446.
./
881. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms.
Josephine Caulfield, re: Disapproval of EPA'_s
preferred alternative, (undated). P. 501447-501447.
882. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Ms. Dolores
Benner, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501448-501448.
883. Letter to Ms. -Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from
S. and Ms. Janet Vitello and Children, re:
of EPA's preferred alternative, (undated).
501.449.
Mr. Antonio
Disapproval
P. 501449-
884. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA, from Mr. John and
Ms. Anita Anderson, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 501450-501450.
885. Letter to Ms. Leanne Nurse, U.S. EPA,' from Ms. Betty
Jane Schaeffer, re: Disapproval of EPA's preferred
alternative, (undated). P. 50~451-501451.
886. Article entitled "Off-the-shelf bugs hungrily gobble
our nastiest pollutants," written by Mr. James D.
Snyder, (undated). P. 501452-501453.
887. U.S. EPA Public Notice entitled "EPA Releases the
Revised Proposed Remedial Action Plan for the Austin
Avenue Radiation Superfund Site," 2/28/94. P. 501454-
501454.
888. Transcript of public meeting, Austin Avenue Radiation'
Site, 3/15/94. P. 501455-501489. A cover letter is
attached.
889.' U.S. EPA Public Notice entitled "EPA Modifies the
Revised Proposed Plan for the Austin Avenue Radiation
Superfund Site," (undated). P. 301490-301490.
101
-------
SITE SPECIFIC GUIDANCE DOCUMENTS INCLUDED
3. .
4.
5.
6.
1.
Memorandum to Region I, IV, V, VII, and VIII Waste
Management Division Directors; Region II Emergency. and
Remedial Response Division Director; Region III, VI, .
and IX Hazardous Waste Management Division Directors;
and Region X Hazardous Waste Division Director, U.S.
EPA, from Mr. Don R. Clay, U.S. EPA, re: The role of
Baseline Ri~k Assessments in Superfund remedy selection
decisions, 4/22/91.
OSWER 9355.0-30
2.
Memorandum to.Radiation Program Managers from Mr.
william J. Gunter, U.S. EPA, re: Radium cleanup
guidance, 4/16/92. A report entitled "Relationship
Between Radium Concentration Levels in Soil and Radon
Transport Through Soils into Homes" and a report
entitled "Cleanup Standards for Radium Contaminated
Soils" are attached.
Technical Support Document for the 1992 Citizen's Guide
to Radon, prepared by U.S. EPA, 5/92.'
EPA 400-R-92-001
A Citizen's Guide to Radon (Second Edition), The Guide ~
to Protecting Yourself and Your Family from Radon,
prepared by U.S. EPA, U.S. Department of Health, and
U.S. Public Health Service, 5/92.
Federal Register, Part II, Standards for Remedial
Action at Inactive Uranium Processing Sites, 1/5/93.
Letter to Interested Party from Mr. Gerald. P. Nichols
and Mr. Henry Powsner, New Jersey Department of
Environmental Protection and Energy, re: Subchapter I.I
of the Radiation Protection Code, N.J.A.C. 7:28,
1/20/93. The subchapter is attached.
102
-------
. BIBLIOGRAPHY OF SITE SPECIFIC GUIDANCE DOCUMENTS
1.
Guidance for Conductina Remedial Investiaations and
Feasibilitv Studies Under CERCLA, prepared by,.
OSWER/OERR, 10/1/88.
OSWER #9355.3-01
2.
CERCLA Comoliance With Other Environmental Statutes,
prepared by.J.W. Porter/OSWER, 10/2/85.
OSWER #9234.0-2
3.
CERCLA Comoliance With Other Laws Manual (Draft),
prepared by OiRR, 8/8/88.
OSWER #9234.1-01
4.
CERCLA Comoliance With Other Laws Manual Part II:
Clean Air Act and Other Environmental Statutes and
State Reauirements, prepared by OERR, 8/1/89.
OSWER #9234.1-02
5. .
Suoerfund Exoosure Assessment Manual;
4/1./88.
OSWER #9285.5-1
...... r 1"\t:'"D"D
-~ -----,
T"\-r~1"\:a,..~..:1
... - -.- -- --
6 .
Suoerfund Public Health Evaluatlon Manual, prepared by ~
OERR and OSWER, 10/1/86.
OSWER #9285.4-1
7.
Toxicoloav Handbook, prepared by Life Systems, Inc.,
T.E. Tyburski, and OWPE, 8/1/85.
OSWER #9850.2
8.
Community Relations in Suoerfund:
Version, prepared by OERR, 6/1/88.
OSWER #9230.0-03B
A Handbook (Interim
9.
A Guide to Selectina Suoerfund Remedial Actions,
prepared by OERR/HSCD, 4/1/90.
OSWER #9355.0-27FS
103
------- |