•> United States
Enviiwu
Afloney
Office rf
Eniorgency snd
Response
September 1987
Superfund
Record of Decision:
Kane & Lombard,
-------
11
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
(I'lHU f'Hd I"'""cllo,,, 0II11t~ ,..m. b6fon ,0",,,,,,;1.11
1. ..I'O..T NO. 12. 3. "ICI"INf'S AcceSSION ""0.
~PA/ROD/R03-87/037
'T"'I ANa SU.TIT"'I S. ""dIU OATI
~UPERFUND RECORD OF DECISION - '30 lQA7
Kane & Lombard, MD '0 'I..IIO"WING C"GANIZA TION COOl
~ First Remedial Action
7. AUTHO".S) .. 'I..IIO..W,NG O"GANIZAfION "1i'O"T ""0.
~. 'I"IIO..WING O"GANIZATION NAMI A,.,O AOOIIISS Jo. '''OG..AM II.IMINT NO.
". ...~'" "..-'" J IQ..ANT Ne.
12. S'ONSOIIING AGINCY NAM' ANa AOO"ISS 13. TYI" Oil "II'O"T ANa '1"100 COliU'EO
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Final ROD Report
401 M Street, S.W. 1.. 1'0,.,8O'IIINQ AOINCY coo.
Washington, D.C. 20460 800/00
". IU"LIMINTA..., NOT IS
.
I'" A88T..Ac:T
The Kane and Lombard site is an 8.4-acre parcel of undeveloped lan!3 in Balt.imore,
Maryland. Dumping and burning of construction debris, domestic trash and drums~occurred
at the site from 1962 until 1967 when the city passed an ordinance prohibiting the "pen
hurning of refuse. Illegal dumping continued from 1967 un t il approximately 1984, during
Lch time many citations were issued for i.llegal burning on the property. In 1980
,',ciryland State inspectors observed between 400 and 500 drums, the majority of which were
rusted, damaged and contained holes. Following an onsite property assessment, EPA
authorized the immediate removal of 1,163 drums in 1984. Of those, 822 drums were
classified as empty and 341 drums contained contaminants which included: benzene,
toluene, xylene, PABs, PCBs and heavy metals. Approximately six inches of soil below
the drums were removed and disposed offsite. The site was stabilized by regrading,
capping and revegetation. Currently soil and qround water are contaminated with these
prior drum contaminants.
The selected remedial action for this site fncludes: removal of drums, hot spots and
contaminated soil (approximately 67,000 yd3); site cleaning and removal of vegetation
to facilitate the construction of subsurface containment/diversion structures;
construction of a~1e:t...~ay.~r:-:80:U cap; construction of drainage system; clearing of
drainage ditch a-lo~g:':easti:~f~e;;of; the site; development of necessary surface water
(See Attached sheet-)l':;'~~'~i.~"b:;?~ >C.
<.'~ . . -". .' .-:-_~~:r.~-. :';' ~/;' -
~~;,::: ~. . -, .. '''-r - .
~7. . '-; "': .':.'7~if -/ :.IIt...'", WO"OS ANa OOCUWINT ANA&. "111
~ oUCttl8!TOQ' ." '" b.IOINTIIIIIJI8SIO",N 1118010 f'''''' C. COlA fl FietdiCtoup
J. "-
Decision .. . - -
Record of
Kane & Lombard, MD
First Remedial Action .
Contaminated Media: gw, soil
Key contaminants: Voca, PCBS, PAHS,
organics, heavy metals
IST"'8UTION STATIWINT ". SICU'IIIT., ~&.AS8' Thu R,porr, 2'. NO. 0" 'AG~~
one
- 20. SIC\,I'IliTY CLASS ,TIt"~, 22. '''ICI
/ None
.". ,- 222t.1 (8.... 4.77)
""."10"'. .0"'10,.... O..O...T.
-------
EPA/ROD/R03-87/037
Kane & Lombard, MD
First Remedial Action
16. ABSTRACT (continued)
run-off management facilities; and ground water monitoring. The estimated capital cost
for this remedial action is $4,692,660 with annual O&M of $28,930.
-------
J!1
~
De:LARATION E'eR THE RECORD OF DOCISION
Site Name and Location
Kane and tanbard Superfund Site - Source Control East Baltimore, Maryland. .
Statement of Purpose
This decision document represents the selected reoedial action for
this site developed in accordance wi th CERCtA, as amended oy SARA, and to
the extent practicable, the National Contingency I?lan.
. ,
The State of Maryland has concurred' on the selec~ed- .remedy.
Statement of Basis
This decision is based upon the ad~inistrative rscord (index
attached). The attached index . identifies the items which comprise t.'1e
aaninistrative. raccr~. upon: wi'tr~ the selection 06- a remedial::action'~ is" ba.sed.
-' .~ w . - . ~ ~; ..:;;:~-
. <
"'.'w
lJescriptlon of' the SelectedRenedy
- .
-::.. ~-.
- %: ~~::: .
This remedy focuses only on the ~ and tJJMbard property becaus$' Z2":.
adjacent properties are in the process of being investigated by the Stata
of Maryland. Ground water in the area will be deferred il"1 this ~rd of
Decision until. further investigations. on these other potential sites are
concluded.
The selected site remedy does not attempt to ensure cornplianc~ ~it~
311 ~, but will be consistant, to the extent practicable, wit~ those
action specific ARARs.
The selected rattedy consists of the. following:
*
~t1Oval. of' :1rums and .hot spots, conta..~inated soil on t.'1e si t~.
* ~S:ite ::l_q~ng and rawval of "Jegetatiol'\ to the '!xtant necessa=:.r
":?~#-!fd~f~.~ns~«:tion r,f t.,e f1eCeSsary ~1tponents. .
~ ~~--~'~;~~:':~~~~~;'~:_~,-~:~1~'~~ ~~--~~ .
.~~~;~;~~c:Ons't&1i:tfiorlr of subsurface containment/1iversion structures co
..~-.i:.tbO~tn;.Ot~@fl&; t.,e uncontroll~ lateral :nigration of oro:sently
~;:~::)1~tam.irnifed: shallo'", ~round ;..star' fro'"!1 the site, and Jrel/ent ~1e
";;,;-:.![.:taterati}!t'~harge Elow - '1f unc:Jr. :~~i~.3i:~1 ;-c~~.:..,c .vat:r i:1t~ t.:'e
waste area.
* Construction of "i ~ul til~yaJ: soil cap over t.:'e area to ~:>r~l!ent
~'e in!ilt=3tio~ of ~rsci9itation and surface .~ter int~ ci.e
wast~ .3rea.
* Construction of a drai~age 3Yst~.
-------
* Clearing of drainage ditch along the east side of the site.
* Development of necessary surface watsr runoff management facilities,
* Continued ground water monitoring of the site.
DECLARATION
The selected remedy is protective of human health and the environment,
attains Federal and State requirements that are applicable or relevant
and appropriate, and is cost-effective. By removing the identified hot
spots, this remedy satisfies the preference for treatment that reduces
toxicity, mobility, or volume as a principal element.
JaroesM. Sen
Regional administrator
-------
Site Description and Summary of
Remedial Alternative Selection
for the Kane s Lombard Superfund Site
Introduction
The overall objective of the Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study
(RI/FS) was to collect information needed to evaluate actual and potential
risks to receptors from exposure to site-related contamination in soil,
surface water, or ground water. This information supported a feasibility
study of remedial alternatives for controlling sources of contamination on
the Sane and Lombard site. Because of the absence of nearby domestic
supply walls, this investigation did not include the collection of data
needed to evaluate alternatives for active aquifer restoration.
Furthermore, the investigation focused^only on the Kine & Lombard property
because adjacent properties are in the process of being investigated by the
state of Maryland. Ground water in the area will be deferred in this
Record of Decision (ROD) until further* investigations .on these.- other
potential sites are concluded. - v--. .;..;„
Site Location and Description.-^
The 'Kane and> Lombard site is an 8-. 4 acre "parcel of \ini|6velbped,is &jo&l*^<^ea&t~tel:tinGte with an
index map of the vicinity of the Ka:\e?*aa& ~'' ~
• •' '
Between 1962 and 1971, the si^- w|-€»cayia^i^^^j;r.ejEit?^.^nth solid
and hazardous wastes. Befeweeri?7lahi9&
surface of the site;. In l^. :
graded> capped^^aiui. fenc«£^^r,-«rt this' action
removed the^dite
-------
Fit ORE 1 MAP OF L _ NMORE IN THE VICINITY OF
Tiir iriiir urn i^
-------
-2-
Th~re are t:,ree relati1/ely 9E=rr:1eable water-i:>earing zones llnderlyi:1g
the Kane and tJ;Jr.!bard site to a <1e!?th of 15~ feet. '!'he first WC'ter-bearing
zooe consists of fill, sandy silt, and silty clay between 1k1 and 40 fee'~
deep. A 25-8" foot thick layer of silty clay, clay, and sandy silty clay
separates the first and second wate!:-bearing zones. The second water-
bearing zone consists of sandy silt and silty sand between 50 and 120 feet
deep. A layer of clay to sandy silty clay 'approximately 2fI feet thick
separates the second and third wate!:-bea!:ing zones.' The third wat::::r-
bearing zone consists of sand and silty sand over 130 feet deep.
Site History
Pt:ior to about 1920 the area now occupied by the rane and tA1'.bard si te
was undeveloped woodlands. eased on a comparison of topography bet-Neen
1922 and 1968, approximately te~ feet of fill was, dist;ibuted on the site
, after 1922. ' ,
-
!n 1962, ~war::i and Harietta ~raeI and Albert and Cele Laroay
acquired the r~ope7ty .~p,a.- 111~~E.1~;-~ -~~~~ r~v~1:i8l. J~J62.:. df~~ ;E?~e;5 .>...
Sl te. In' JUne' 19";~7- Of.1:Wo~:,_..822.1;~, ~....r;~.. cl~SSl :~,~.;tS~erng~l'j -- C~n,t:~-;t1...~
~a~ts int:t~, .~~~J,:~~:~...:i/,->~.~:~;~~ -':_--~,-;,~' ~~,_._,.:,';~ ,~- ;,:::._."._-~--"-
:'!n ~to~r;~J~~~fr-t.~~~:~:!:~ ~~~ ~11;~Uc:-¥o:)~ t.,e~ '~~:t~~~a3J: -?Fior!tt~s- i:.jst
('.!pc.). A RIns'-:~~:~~:a;tcr5e~.. ~9~.an;f:/ic!s 9~?1.eteg---tn~ ,~~~~19~7., -,!:1_,--
~.ori 1. '1387, the: --hit'e<. -.oJas - 3C:¥r., 6)::::aded cinc :1'l"1:~s~Eij j'j' ::?\ b5~irii~i.~ .-
- ~ - - =
erosion. " ,
Cur!:ent 51.':;- 'Status
. -...-.- ~
- - ., - ..;. - ". 4 ::..-
- . . .
. '-- .~-,-~ ~..
, -'
." '-:~.:-;:" .. :...- ...;..-- -
-------
-3-
Fi::7ure 2 illustrates t:.'1e aoot:oximate locations of t."1e on-5i t~ soil 5a.~oles.
Table 1 suwmarizes t.'1e nurnb~rs of samples in 'Nhich organic contaminants
were r1etected, and the t:'1ini:nurn, mean, and 1IaXi~ conC'~ntrations of t."1e
contaminants. organic compounds were detected in 90 percent ot the
shallow soil samples (19 of 21 samples), 93 percent of t."1e test pit samples
(28 of 39 samples), and all of the 17 soil-boring Samples analyzed. The
most COLl\oonly occurring canpounds or chenical groups were phthal~tes, -
polynuclear arauatics, toluene, mapthalene, PCBs, isophorone, carbon
disulfide, and pesticides, In all, 59 different organic \.:ompounds were
detected in at least one of the soil samples. -
Table 2 smmarizes the minimun, mean and rnaxlmun concentrations of
inorganic compo\mds detected in the 73 soil S&-nples. Of the 17 inorganic
consti tqents analyzed for, 13 were detected in at least 85 percent of t."1e
samples, less catm:)nlydetected inorganics include beryllium, cadmium,
m~cury , and silver.
Three distinct water-bearing zones were identified underlying the
site: ~ perched zone 10 to 40 feet deepia semi-confined zone
approximately 199 feet deepi and a secoru.:3 semi~nfi~ zone approximately
13~ feet deep. - -
. ... - . >
, The first water-burinq zone ,consrsts of the lowiK-. portion of' the,'" -'i"-
fill layer and a sl,lty layer' at the~top'of the Arundel clay. Grounctwate~
in this' zone flows to the northeast: at a rate betweerl 0.2, and 11::8. -'-, :
feet/day. Ground wa~ fr'aa the ~ite, may flow 'th~o,U9h a ar~f~e cUJ.v.rt':';',
and a buried stream valley toward" Hlu;rlng. Run,.~ -' ~:9r9~ 'Witte,t' in, ~e"~'
Za1e is sanewhat contaminated by arfphatic" ('up- to 67 ucj/I') and 'aranatk
(UP. to 647 ug/l) organic;s. ~e",_!9n~"" has.~ ~~si9J:@t~--as a- Class" UI
A aquifer beCause ft probabfy 3~O"es: no1: haY~- a-,.$uffic~t~ are.at: extept ~o
provide an ad~te yie.ld- fo.~_'~~~tlc,. ~,:~.r;-:JMPP,~}~;. ~'~"- - '..-, T_- ~-
. . ...' ~ - . - - -. - '-="I -. .. .... . .....'
The second water'~&eari~cj::'z~~_,dor$ts.ts j:)f- i.f.i~:~""'~~QCarn:SangY: si Lt.,
~t ~robably r~r~~ ~~t~o,~'.oi; ~-' Pa~~ep#-,!8~'tfi?n'< .Gr~uii!~ Water. '-
~n thl~: zone flows-;-~- '~;-ro!-:~':t~t~,.a~ ~~J~Lte:j,~~~:-;1~!}.: an~ ~;.}. :,<..;:. .:. . '':-'
_oot/day,~ ~~~9~~ 5~.!=he zorle a~~~lo ~P'F1~;J;;!o:l fr~..~}~~ =r:= '.
sout."1east andc:-wes~~-1'hfi~~ ~Y!'!?e"liY~i~ll{:a
-------
~-- ---
--
-,
--.
-
----
-
---
---
. \--=------~-------......:.'" '," .- - ---1
- ~::.,. --:;;..---
, ...2 " -------= -... :
. so. 1 .so..' - - -$"". \ .
\ .', " " ,~..,/., .~... ---': .~~\. \
\ - - . = ..... -.. ......- -.. -. ~- \
- \ ......' ..... .""......-.::;:\
'\..... -' ....... '.... -..... ' , .
/' ' --,~ -. \~':
. ,. ..'" ,~
.. ~\ . . ',. ....." - .' . ~ ...... - ,..../;:'-. ..:. .~ I,'
'V-.....-~ _.~- ~.~ /' .' .~.. ,. .~..i,'
",' . -.'....... ~.,... - ~
;'::'~_/~/<~.. -, ./'~~.... '.= --, rl:,"
1'"\ -.-.........
\ " /' -, ~ ...,.
-\ . _/--r~. -. ....-~/, ~ ~ i ~
/' . i. ' - ./ ----- . .nt-W
'" ''',.:,'.. ,-: ,...' ..... . - .~.V I!
~ ,,_. -'~) ...~. ..~:-~'~ .~=: ,.'~,a.
/ .;:4£,~~.;r. ",,~1t,'~ ..",' 88o". .~,. .-- I I
"'.,:'I,.~t,"~" ., ' ", ' " ~- V'
./' .' ~;..' c' '. I '. '.'. . - .' . t'.
F.-';""''''~;;' '!7'~' . ,,,< '.' " .;.;." - ,....
'':;,f'~~~.-.~ ~.",.<".~ "".' '''''''.....::'''... --. .~ ttNa I
.~ .~~,,, ~.' -''''''''''';'~,.K: ,aJ. ~ -: ~". ;.~_? '.' ::: '. I,'
1'-~ .:::. S -... -. ~ .....""', '. ..... 1""
.-: :: ;':;.J~ ...~~.~~~~. .
:; ;; ; ;; ::! ~ g 2', ..~~~.~~.. J' .-
...... ...,' t .9 ""' -c ~ =: - '-..~,
~%.:..=~~ ~tM..fIItf%
-..c ~ ~ - ~ 'f.-' ~..- ~ -. ' ~"::.:::
..; --.,.. ~ -' ,"':.::.1 . .
<:r. .~ ~ ..,;
\
~ :;:,
..
- '
...... ;: ?'f-" -:0 :t')
...
.:
t.
.
~~ ~,,-,~~l:~
~ .... ~ ":: --...
4.>
... -
a
-
;::;
. -
",
.. ~ --
2SD-t
. Sca8e in F...
~ 'nen . .~ Fe«
FIGURE a.
LOC~Tl0NS OF ON-SITE SOIL UMPLES
-------
'i .:;'9\
I ~ ' < ~ . !"~.'l .
,,' , '
,. ,,""', ,,;.., '.;',", . ~ ;~, '
'4.'I.;I,:'~ft,:;~.f;':,,: SUMMA ItV Of CONCEN 'IA liONS
" .'}~)yt:~::~'~'i';'1~;:{.!";.' DE T E C T ED ,IN SOIL ( IN
~~:~/"'~" i '" ...,~.; ~ f~.!, . ,:.:.a.'~ ~t{\/:t. ' ~,
"~.\-':.fJ-",,~,,"~1~''';!:Ja..\'',,'' '~ f t
. ~;5:~r '~~~j{1'.~,~j:~\~Ji-~'-'\';'" ' . .
:j ''i~'';'',j ,,: ,{ I ,. j.;:'>';'c r:
':;[.}/'t,,f' :t:;.>~t',j~~;~~'?4'" ' ~ Q
~ "'fi,;r;jii:'~".";' >, .'\.)'''' \iJ ~
; I ':;~Ki1~*"'~~: 'h!:'\F;";7~!. ~
l A 8 f l .4'~f;1~~rt ~{t;~,~~,~:1" /
\ \ ", ~ ,. ~
.r ! \' 0' C)
'. : 1 C ..lOA 0 f 0 It .. \ \, \! ~5 "
,,; ,C'AAB~N OISULfIDE\ \'" '\" ~,
.! ' 'AAN~-1 ,2-DICHlOIOET,.,EftE \ \ ~
. 8 T It I C HlO,..Oe'..ENf ~, \ '~
" i 4-ItfTHVL~2-'ENTANONf \. ;
,~ ; :~~~:~:;~;~~~1 \\ l jt~Q
':') t ',';'!"DICHlOlt08~NlfNE t\ ~
: 'J,j-P:IC"lOR:)~'NIIDINf '\ ~
j !TO~Uf"E ."erNYl BENZENe) \
III I; ;~ :i.;~V~E~~ S'D. "£11 NVl BENZ iNfS~ '
',: ~ . ~ ~UfV~;"ENZ£"l'E\ 't
:., Xi r. "H~NQL ',.H~pIO'~ 8£ NZ (,.1) '\'
10. ~ ' '\~-H( fl~'4-fJp"fNq~ ';: ' \t, ""
~' ?",~:-"hi"L.'O)"(NOl""
, "f~f I~"L1o.p~jeNoL
~"!' ~ I T'IROP'..tCNO~ ~~'~
2 , 4~ 0, I N,I J. 'lOJ..9,tu ENE
NA'H'HALENe
2-"ETHVlNAP"'HALENf
150'HORON£
AC UUPtlfHeN£
ACENAPHittvL'ENE
ANTHAACE..e
I
"it ~o CA) ANftUUCENE
D- ''4~O ~'A,,#,"A"TttRACf~~
r ~ HI~TjH. f kif: 'i ' ," ;
, I
"
t. .
.,
I
. I
'" !
;
!
, ~
......... -.. . ',,,. ...
A,
N
"
6
'12 I.
f 2
~' .
J, .i
1 f,
7 ,>
1
1
]6
7 :i
"
6,
4
4
1
,.." 4
1
. .
17. ;"
7 :"1- ':' ,
15 ,"
7 .\ ,-\.>1;. \ 'i'"~""
~'-,': 1.1 .
1
19
"J
6
1',
Of ~.GA~IC C~N'A"INANTS
UG/IC6.
"
t
NfAN MINIMUM "A" INUit
VALUE VALUE
2. 1 140
]0 l J10
4 2 6
2 2 2
60] 5 1830
2 2 l
51 J 180
510 570 510
.120&100 120000 120000 '
489195 1 17000000
l5587~ 2 .400000
100" J ]60000
151. 40 410
19 55 110
5J 5' 51
528 140 1100
570 570 570
660 660 660
4 JJ J5 4000
Il4 42 ]20
)108 41 21000
914 62 5100
250 J4 140
2088 31 20000
J511 12 "-'\00
1118 1 SO 00
(, 11 'i 11 :1,~ 000
-------
T A ~L f .
.-
,.
SUH"AAY Of CONCENT.ATrONS Qf O~GANIC CONTA"IHAHTS
DETECTED IN SOIL CIN U6/K6)
. . .
.r~~{~!Y1~Y~
" " ~-j t~'~'''' ~ '1 \;\'1 'V J.,I ~ ~t1 I
,':~:t~;~I'~~;;N;:'\ ~;I .,~.!t::;;;.';?~Ji; I
..~\;~ 1,';J\ ,:\ J,Ti~!\'t~~"llj!i~1 III.'
-',':,/""',, '-, -, t:'S -\', II \1-
=: : ~ ~ f (~~,~ =:~:;,~;~~lt~~.~I~~!:~~l:":P" f,. A N I"a f,. f )
INOCt40 1 l~I.(;c"\i.\).\!,j;'a;fHf w
fLUORENE' (2~%4~:EN:ifN'..i,u» j
. fio< " r~ J j,
fLUORANIHE.NE;(~Q' " ~
9ENIO (tI,.nt')fCb~~~N'''fN£ ~(-,
DENIO (G,~~Fr~~fl.LfNf)
o 18iNIOfUa,'A'N.t.H t HIM ~ /
OIMETHYl ~~T"AlAJE JJ
01- H- (tU' "t.~ ~r,..'f.. Al A TE ! <~
815 (l-fTH..l;Kftc~Y&!:~) """UlATE ~;:
8UIVLt1f NzY;a.:)d'HntAl AJE ~ ~
D I-N-OC rYLC.1p,"""~AL AlE .~.
. N-NITAOSOO,.'PJttEHr:lA..INf :';
OlE lOA I II - q: It tHH P Q~ . . ~
" ,4 - 0 Df ~~ \Ii 'i'J!\'b ~ &fhl S "
<
1.,1.-000 t)1J1{~4e~~! ~\~
4,1.-001 ,~~~~tL '!
C HLONDAHE \;ifmH viiH.. d,~
ARO'CHlOA 1 ~4d
ARoeNlO. 1254
AROCHLOA 114;OH~
LAc)EL
I;~
,,'~ . I .
c' ~ ~ ~ r. 1 '. 0 i ,} t, 1 ~ !
. .;~ 0 a L. :. tJ \ ,I {,. ~. \ ~
,1.
N HE AN . "INI"U" "'.I"U" '
VALUE VALUe
" 41.21 32 84000
,)0 2410 48 41000
l4 1819 48 26000
1...1 1911 60 6500
11. 6124 l!l 120000
,SQ 4551 11 81000
i ~.Z.1 1910 41 25000
o II ~ 112; 41 1.000
~ ~. <;. :~ll 190 190 190
..~.5!, 1065 10 9600
,~~ 121 4 J '-4 210000
4.1.;, Z19lS 44 940000
.~ f: !'\ 290 240 1"0
~.I 5JOO 1600 9100
l 41 45 "8
t!Q. 61, 6J 61
.i 100 160 160
.4., 66.. 24 92
{i t""' ..
6 358 20 1100
10 110~ 190 '''000
IS. \>'11» r145a 61 1JOO
.. 1 1100 1100 1100
'1:
"",
. .
I
"
.t ~. !I,'~' ," 1~, ...
..'l~"">.:::''::'''-=.ll
-------
, I
TABLf a. SUMMAAY 01 CONt~HT.A'IO~S 01 INOAGAMIC CONTAMINANTS
DfTECTeD 1M SOil SA~'LfS '10M TfS' 'ITS (IN M"«,) .
'n
i .
I
, "', l!'
i . ,'\ I J 1) " L A3.~((~!i.~,!:t;'.~~}?~\.
, I .,' ~ ~t'l~\~~;r~(":-!4.<'~>~~~~:i~~;':\~'
. ;1. 11~ j.!. ,~~,: .~ti~:'1-..:;"\.'.,Ji,;i"/"':'.'~
..! ~- - - *~~?: ';~:~,:Y'i.'~~:~~'~:f, t:'~~~~.':'.
11.1 t~1I '\". 1 ,Jf ,a\.'j,:.'-,t"i";':-" I,'.,'s'.j.:'r,,
, t- ....~.r', ~\)...~..~" '~!r
, 1'1 n: \ t1 G'h AlU8.I~"UM,'.'~:..\t'1!. )0
Ir:..~ ." I;', I,-,:r h,,:, '", Ir..."1..,. - r"~
. .~. . 6) 1J.a .A I ~.I:~".": 2~;~~j0G\~: 2 J
. ..' Ii \HI a A II;..o'M':0". ,'.Ji"/,~";,,,i 19
. ," \' , b " ,. R f i,..:i ~ii,,, ~':~"~$~f< 1 J
jlr~.'ll.1tll1 CADIIIUII. 16
,\ . v. , A .~ lH ~~ ,.C~AIf'f HIM 1.1' ~~ ni ~ JO
,~& .1.1 \J( ~ A~C08~At!;'T,ti '" 11. t',. 29
IW t /.\ I .~ lli\!"; }~U",~Ej...a ,H ,: il ~ . 50
,..d: ~.,' ~ ~ It".O"'''~J'UM' t<.~r.I~1Qf ~.Hi 29
() j 1!\-141';~htll:o,.a!~l1r\! k~ )0
~\j; \1 ~ .uu!' IltEk.:OI{{! \J! ~ JO
;\ j I' f 141 (j ~ HiMAf4lHf SlUM J)
,., ,1 Pi A. I.' "."GA"e~i1 {i>JH J()
~F~~Q d~.M~.~6iiU~~t~~~& 1~
U IH:;;) v 'H ~I":ft"fl JO
~- OV~~~t S'tVfRlW1~~~t~\~ J
'~~'-Q I~SO.'d~~J ~A;I~& 10
\H ~~ 'J ~ If PVA'HAO i1,t.. . 10.,
~At.::(.~E H1ln,e'J U~~\::'1-~) ~~!lS\i1I2!AJ:O'Utr.~H l
N
. ' ; ~ f
. 'J "t I
;, \ "t ~.;} ,
:' (, W~ 'It) t ;,! ~
"EA~ MINIMUM "'.IMU"
VALUE VALUE
"'~6 1720 14100
24 1 166
5'9 16 6310
5 , 81
1.1 J 89
28J\2 15Z l21000
:1] 2 59
~9;2 14 1190
'2,.7 4 1990
J 728,1 2t.OO 117000
101~ 1 13600
1613 251 6810
')6' )4 1220
,1 0 2
171 9 45JO
" 2 17
5Q1! 19 ]210
l5, ,. 41)
915 J6 lQ]OO
.'
, .
.. ,I'. .~ I, t,
or' ~..' ,,,_(1\'1, '" !" 'I,'
')oj' 'I' ,"'" ...
<;:,}':.2;:;'~
-------
-4-
~
Figure 3-1 and 3-2 depict locations of on-site and off-site :nonitor
wells. .
'there is no ir.mediate heal th threat to the c:a1IIIUni t:y fran ground-water
since residents are Supplied with drinking fAIIt:er by the City of Baltimore.
Ground-water cont:a:nination may be an important issue relative to potential
future use of the ground water W1derlyinq the si t:e, and the potential effect
of migration of contaminated ground water beyond the site boundaries.
The proxL~ity of Patterson High School and recreational facilities
makes direct contact exposures a potentially significant threat. This
threat is redu::ed by ,the presence of the clay silt cap that covers most
of the site and the fence which surrounds the site. Receptors related to
the Francis Scott ~y Medical Center and other nearby properties have mre
limited pOtential for direct contact exposure to contamination at t.~ sit~.
~lternative Evaluation
- .
'l11e remedial action objectives arisinq frcm the public health '-, ,~-f..
evaluation are the following: (1) eliminate, or reduce to acceptable rfak-
based levels, soi 1. contaminants which represent potential public ~l th::,f ~.~::~~~:: ~.
threats via direct exposure to the contaminated materials 'and (2) e1.i..'Dinata-; "
or reduce to acceptable risk based levels, ground water cOntaminants whi6h~
represent potential publi~ health threats under the assuqtption of future
consumptive use of the second wate; bearing zone underllfi'ng ~ site. .
Contaminants of concern -include vinyl chloride, trtchlor.Qethylene, benzene,
nicks)., and cadmium. The first water bearing zone is ~t considered a
potential source qf drinking water. Of :tIajor import:anqe tq the second of
t..'1ese objectives'is the possibility of reqional ground~water contamination,
arising from the variety of otheJ;.. potential haZardous ,waste sites in t;.,e
near vicini t:y of the iQme and LOmbard -property. ~ -$8CQnd '!ajor cons idera-
tion is t.~e fac,to-~'J.j: the~ne- and ~rd si teJ'en6Ompasseso~ly a ~~tion
of the excava.t:i'onr!f'1l known -to have exts~ln=~(rarea-:-=-~a=;~~}~ ~f .
the. ~t~ntial for other contributio[\$ >o~~quoo .water .~<.tl~i.Q~~.iQri;t';!.thi:3
~~O?~ ~~ Jimited 1:0 ~~si~er~ti9n ~~soUr:=a ~trol~r,;~~~~t!~. tQ'f'~UP~ ~::
i\!ll~lnata ~"1~c~~~~?ut,~~~ ~th8. ~ and ~ti~;.Q?~reqlooa.l"T9r?blems.
.' "."~-:1:;'fF\'t..":;-:{~~£:~~~ t ~4 -:~12:r.;.'!~ .
Ba~~~¥A~,~~~~j~ti ves, ~1.Inerowi ':~~9" .C;OI!~~-.a1. ternati v~s ~7e
'k-r78ned .~$~~!J:i[~~~"~~,~~~1:-ted n\.r.!ber of ~l ta:~~l.?~~~ ~~~tJ-c£ap'\e for r~e(ha..
actlons ;,,~td:!ie~¥si,te'~:';;-:i-.!;ome of these .31 terna tl \/e9~re re::tOved from further
<,:~nsidera.ti?oftHiasea!;~6{t;$i~te-~i f ic info~tion and otherJicomb,¥iiti './e
t:ri teria. '."'The$if;itnef~c:riterla include: ef;f~tiveness,O' ~:5!-",~~tab'i:lity
~OO" cost. 'J-'t'~ (~~.I.:. .".;1>;'1 :
;~
:;P:::-'-5~ :::~':-~'- ~
_i1'~ ~(\~!3~ ~2~~\~
-.
:;
~~~.? -.. ;.i~:~"1 -:
~~-r...:;.
. ~< ...-,...~
. -:." '!E!i'~
~ -r-~:; ::..--..-","~~:' ,,-r'i"'EiV\t
--..... ...
-~~ ::~~ ~-::!'~~~: :~
~M fe"\;- ~-~~
- ~'1-'...,..
-~~:: :"- 0> - --.
.....- :." '-=~r'~~..,...-
...~-:-=-.- --:::: .:-=-:-.. --:;.
..~~ .~--~
- .
- -.,. -', .~- .o:;...~
:<....-:1'..-:
..,~. -'""-
. ~ ",--"=-" -:
-..
, .
-------
MoniWr Wt
-------
J
J
3
1
1
J
1
1
1
i
i, £.,; -si,,I ,x: ~ ' -"-
SHeloca"
Groundwater Monitor'
13W-032 WW Site 13; Screened
to a Deptfi of 32 Feet
1 i
1 Mile
>i
FIGURE J-2 LOCATIONS OF OFF-SITE MONITOR WELLS
-------
-J-
{/
~
~e alter:1ati'les that 'Ner~ dis~iss_>d from retention are presented below
wit~ the justification for eli:nination. A roore detailed discussion of each
can be found in the feasibility study.
Al temati ve
. Reason (s) for Elimination
- 1CRA c.andfill
Higher implementation efforts
without providing increased security.
tong-tam operation. and maintenance.
Land Disposal Requlations complicate
on-site staging of excavated materials
for red i sposa 1. High cost.
Soil Flushing
. ;~ ,,'
Long temt remediation is questionable.
Less effective and unreliable.
Not. effective in removing metals
'frcn the soils' nor~, contributing
to their Umnobi1rzati~n in the'soil
matrix.' Not effective;:-on -~face
contaminati'on. .;., -
- 8ioloqical Land Treatment
Land Fatming
- ... ~~-.... .
Unreliacle-~nOt.~.f.fect:i ve
in 'reooviD; or '1mnot)ll-i'ztnq;.. ~tal con.~
...;.... ts -'",- .c.
,looI:aul~ . .". - ~.
. ;~--_...
The alternatives that hciv:~'--been, re~i-n8d for further analySis are:
,->
In-Si te Biorec:lamation,
<
--... "".-.
Al terna ti ve 1"
. '.
-,,<
.
.-;.7C' .
- '--'-~Nb .~ction~Wi th drainageway :naintenance
. arxi long-teC1°-mcni toring. .
~ ..---... ~- ._- .'
.- ~ -- .
Cont3inment- MUltilaye:C3p
Alternative 2 '.
...
Alternative.) .
",!,,'
l'~ - ~~~:~ ;~9-- .1I{f; ~~
~ ....,
E:cC:.-: 'at ion/Inc:inera tion
a .'lff:-site disposal
~..-.,.-";ff:-si.te~i-ncinez;aticn
Altemati; ,4;!~;~~:+;;:,~]==:::~~:ion
~terna,ti~.!:~'~fi~';-;?~i,:~~;';~:i-':;~;\J'f':;;" In 31tu VItrlflcatlon
". .;:: -:~t?;~~:;:::'~~1rl~>;' . .' . ~ ~;.
To~ .ana\]:'~f:~.,;.,~;~~tl~/~S,-.m-~y~l~tlcn '~s conduc:tag t."1at",:
considered ~;\~~:,t~~:~~ts of t;."1e....~.:~~.~und ~~~Cnents .~hd ~~!i,
?e~'Jthori%at'fqn~~jF!;S:'~)i?'of'.!9~6 Y\d..~~~ t:'.lrrl:!rtt Jersion of t:.'e~'Jatio(lai
CO'1tingenc:y Plan (~~t ~-(5"'-E!ed. Reg. 479 ~.2, ~vet1ber 20, 19135). Three ".
OJ, Jad ca tegor ies Wars ~Used for the evaII":':; ::ion :r... af fecti veness, .
. 1 . . 1 . d " $I< . -
-.. l~; ~.::~~'::w~>~Z:~~:'&.">t:...~'B~~~~;"'-r,,",-q-~~~ ,,4g-.i~i"~ .x..:~-~D.":;'~
-. . ~~.
:~-::1I' _... ~ '" .t ~;.£').;"S-;':"'~:.:i: ?
',;
~ -: ~~~Ji~ :
-... . . t.
. .
.<.-
"
.~
. '? ~~- .'.:. "'. .;., ~
.-;:.~- ".' : .,;''r- -I, "- .
~
. _.-:-",
':......
- . .
- ..,~\....- ::......."
. .
- --- .. ---
::. ~ --.-:::=::=-~-=:--~-~ ~.:~~. -::-=--
-,
. ..-~ '.--
.~"-_. .~~
-'.:I;;;..~ ..-::t'..!"7;;,~->-,~~~;'.~:::~!?:~ :~:"r~;~.
:...Z~. _..~
."" ~.~. -;'"1
. ; -. ..... -0'-
."';"-_."'~_oI:
-------
~
-6-
~-1it~in these categoties thete ate factots that considet the shott-tee and long-
term effects 'of each alternative. The evaluation is presented in detail in
the Feasibility Study. 'n1e following is a su:rmary of the evaluation:
~ternative 1. - No Further Action
The ~p tequires that the no further action alternative be consideted. .
Implementability
Although designated as a no futthet action alternative, in that no
tenedial steps ate taken with tespect to the wastes temaining on-site, this
alternative does incla maintenance. of the existing fence (which has been
subject to damage) and cap (which has been subject to erosfen) in order to
prevent their deterioration and subsequent re-exposure of the wastes. .
In addition, the remaining waste materials and debris at the surface of
the si te (in the drainageway) are to be temoved. .
.
Under this alternative, Waste materials would not be t8D0ved -fran th.
site,. destroyed, or further i:tmObilized. Waste would continue t:o C'(!)ntact~
and presumably leach into, the fitst water beating zone, and whateve.~' . '''. -' .
degree of tain-water infiltration . exists-wi t:h the present cap' would~c;.~' ,;.,:-._~'..
continue. Sam .upon observed erosion of t:be'.cap, its intergr.ity-l1iight b!'"'
expected to diminish even with maintenance. ..Overall,. this alternative
':oIi11 not be 'ptotective. .., It should be. noted.. th.at a'll' aluernatives include
these essential steps, alt."1ough.. themnitor:ing: pernodmay vaty.:
- . '!'_- ...
.. . .
. ~.::". 3:~~::t. ~J
. ...- -
Since no waste remecHat~on measuras will be iInplemented, t~~nical ...
feasibility and availability are not an issue.
4.:: ~i:.. -~~~ ~J~ ;'=r: ._~ ~~L ."
.~.;.
Effectiveness
'*
- -~ y:; :: .-.. ~= -r ;!.;.~~~.~. ;~ _&-;..r;t!.:=-~ :-If"'"~~:- _0_: ~.::
The existi:1g conttol st%i~s'~.5t,~taecs.ttetW1:'ndt' ,,eet' :;:C~~SlJbti tia C
criteria Eor ~ntainment and control of oonta~inants.
'*
. _:;~ ..::":c:;i$v~:-''".'';.~!~L5::~~''~,~, 3'-'fS~~tiac-..,~ 1": :~::-.':J::;...'~:~c::
The e:ublic;and;:,.the~.S;~~:09P.Csedit:h,i:s :a1:.tel!natNe:;::stric:e ;t-i~tt~, if any,
red\l:tio~~,.i~:..v.irornental- _impac:ts: .c:Ouldr-ri,'1 :>rofjra::1 in ='!a:uatin'J
i "~!'1din'J -:hanges in 'leal t;, risks i:;; 'l:1c~r'::~in r:ue ':.'J ~1: c,xJtantial
'?t~senc~ ~f :1ear~y 0Ef-sit~.c~nt~~i.,a~t scr~~~es.
-------
-7-
CiJst
Capital Cost - $624,~60
Present WOrth* - $428,45"
. * AsS\m!S )g years maintenance (waste left in place) .
The high cost for the disposal of debris arises fran the assumption
that these materials have been contaminated, for example, by runoff from
the site, and therefore require disposal in a R:RA landfill. It may be
t.'1at these r.aterials could be disposed of in a Subtitle D landfill rather
than a RCRA landfill. Unit cost for disposal in a nonhazardous fill are
estimated to be $45 per cubic yard (as opposed to $203 ~r cubic yard for a
RCRA land fill) resulting in maximum potential savings, for diS9Qsal of
2016 cubic yards, of approxiately $319,000. This would result in a total
capital cost of approximately $225,000 rather than $624,069. This saving
would be partly offset by expense incurred .in sampling and testing of the
debris and sediment which would be necessary to. obtain ac:ceptanc:e at a
~onhazardous landfill.
Alternative 2 - Containment
. This alte~native is based upon the concept of r81lOving t.'- remaining
drums and hot spots of contaminated soils, and isotating the ~stes';" in
?lace,' from contact with .ground and surface. water'" as~ a meansTof r~ucin4
or elilninating their conuibution to'-~tercontamination~" This. alter.natIve
fcx:uses upon positive actions to"-'rec1u::e' the hazard 'posed:-by-those was6as,~
by preventing their contact wi,th water. Direct eonta~.th- tlie wa$ta ~
,tta~erials is> prevented in essentially the same way as under: to'!e no action
alternative, by- site ,security..:(ttSsures; however, the iopo~~--of ~'ese
controls is height;!1ed b~Lthe' need,to:-:naintatn .tl'e",in~ity"of-t.'e contai!'1-
1tEnt structures'. 1':"'\e essential elements of this alternati',e include t:.~e
following: - '-::'-"'.~':'::?<": -, ". _a.:.~' ~'---er.:< .:.:.;. ::;~..~
:~i;2.e'.:.-o-: -+'~'"::..;3-.o-~
:.. ::~ "" _..:. ".I~~ ~_-r 'f..
..~ ~- .-.
--:-.:-::r
*
Removal of irurns and hot spots on site~
':;2~€r~. -:":'~-;;:':' ~
---,----- -_. -
*
Site cleanLI'1g and re:ooval of vegetation to the extant necessat:y far
cons.tructi',,)r.t' o-f'f'tme !1eCeS~l:::'~~f1ents:E 2C-:i.:D.:;:: :-:.';::'~"::>'.5 >; -
. t~j-~snL~t"'C~ - ~ ~ 1 ~~~~O:> 5~ ,:1'f'lI'.itj1f! i ~~!!~-:; ~(':: ~ .-:::;~- ~ 2~'
* ConsUuction of subsurface contairment/diversi"n structures ~ both
Qrevetit ;:cthe,~~1:e~bidsl&_al<::nti~.atlOft'-"'of.;preSer1tly ~CGntaml'na Cad
Sha'~:~~i9~"~~'~~t:e~ ~awit.y. -, tro:\\;;4:M-rs i t£e.; ~m~(.;:~1i'!"ent} - t:::\~ ;.ra:,ta,,~l
recn.rg.;3~~O\il:~oes~1,1!ICOat3.~ ina t.ad -grOu."'1d:~.tari i'nto~: the -,\last3" '1raa .
;~~~:~::::._~':,:~'_~~1;~_~':~ >~"~~ti 1i~i:," , ~::2 ~~~ -i~;:: - ~'.~- ~ ~
* Coiiitrd.~~-~~&;9f;~:ai ~ulti-ta~r 09 over t.~a dre.:! 1:0 ~r.:vent t..1e
inf"i.1.tt:ratl:_:':f..'Qfi.oreci:oit.~~toa:~.!nd surface. 'Nat3r-~t.~tQ'"t:i,c. "i.Vt!tsta.
are~5;f".:/;,;;"'l:' :,":<.',:,::r. .. .
:~-:~::';.~ :.:--_::.~- _..:- ._~.:..~.... ~"..£:~.~:~s:~s
-,e: ~~;:.
:"5'..:r .:.:.. .. ,::r 'if
* Construct~)n of a drainage syst~.
- ~ - --;:::-
~:;:- --
:. . - -: } r: ~ ~ ~
-- --:- ..._'~.- -
.. ,_. - -
* Cl.aa-ring 0':-Jr,:linaq= :::.:lt~~:1 ',!lQt!lg' t::."1-e:-~ase 51::3 ,)~:::\.~ ::;-i ta;' ;
- -....... .:. .
--. .~~-_.~"-.
-: ~~ : ..(~_.:. ~i:.. ~~"'... --:~
-
*
Cevelo~nt of ne-::ess.:lr:! 3~r face ,Jat.:r :='.l:1of:~anag~::nt. Eaci!.i ti;s ~
.. -. -... '-..-
.
-,;.
-------
11
-B-
*
::>ntinu_>d:]::ound ;..;acar ,~1Onl tonng of t.,e S1 te.
Imp lementabil i ty
.. Construction of a subsurface barrier along the north boundary must
consider continuing structural intergri ty and chenical compatibili ty
of the structure because of its construction through the waste.
Furthennore, t.'1is barrier will be located in relatively close
proximity to tanbard Street, and may be subjected to vibration
from traffic. The potential for differential settlement and
possible damage to the cap must also be considered. Cost for
this construction ~y be more difficult to estimate because of t.1e
potential variations from ordinary barrier wall construction.
..
Any of these cap options wi 11 improve the perfo:tmance of the
existing single-layer cover by exhibiting, substantially lower
permeability, and greater resistance to erosi.on'.
~essary depths of barrier walls wi 11 run from 20 feet on the north
boundary to approximately 55 feet on the so.utlt.. These, depths are
wi thin the range of conatructability for such structures.,
~
.. .~
..
.
.
..
The capacity of the existing stoanwater 'drainag.e system, and
consequently t.'1e requirement tor on-site~ water storage" may
require additional investlgation.
, -
. - . - .-"
" .
- .
E ffectl veneSS
. ~_. .' '"
':: -:?C
. ".~,4'\i.:;i~=.;j:
.~- --
..
To the ex~nt. that:. these.. !DI!_ur.es- orewent:. ~ migJiationi of: water
througn the sit'e "N8ste"~te~lals.~-- 'thi:S-~al~rna~:iYer:Can"be: eX?8Cted
to reduce. signif.iCaPtly'J t..~e".gr9:und~ ~t#~;"CQ~j.M.t.ion:arrri.s1ng
from this 59ufF-~~.t~ .-:; ',.~;~::::;;z'~" --.r::~~y~ -: "'Oi.j~/.:--,>-, '
..
Renoval of t."le drums and hot spots ;oIill r-adu::e t.'1e toxicity, ~
. :'!Iobility and vol~ on t.l-te site. '!'he new C3p '..,ill ~lso' c~nstit:lte'
.~~~ addi ~t?pa;~:,!?~~l~ !~~EF i~5t:L"":,~~~n~."h.~~ ~~~:~~id:.
'A...equat~. - ?:)t:~~crnen t ~,3!1~:.'r:) ~~tl~~!)...at...:: r.a...4~!':I~j, 'I. ~~;.,e-~ .GQS 1.",- as:
comoarad' to 'oC?ier' alternatives (.~mich, ti.:
-------
-9-
.~
*
~~der ~,is o~tion, a relatively ~11 amount of eXc3vated '~st=s, .
from the Carrier construction on the northern Ooundary, will r~ain
for reburial. If these cannot be incorporated wi th the rest of t.,e
fill for capping, they wi 11 be disposed of off-site. Addi tional
debris fran the renovation of the drainage ditch will require
disp:>sal. Land Disposal ~irE!nents concerninq disposal might be
applicable depending upon timeframe. If disposal oc:curs before
NovEltlber 1988, this will not be an issue.
*
~nort-teen Unpacts likely to arise from ~,is alternative will
likely be limited to those associated with the construction
activity itself, in teens of noise, odor, traffic and other
nuisance conditions, and maybe considered minor.
. .~ ,.'
*
tong-tam issues to consider include the need for ~riodic cap
~n~, ma.naqement, potential ground water trJjnitoring.
Discharge of contaminated water from the ffrst'water bearing zone
to the nearest publicly-o~ed treatment works via the ci ty sewer
system will require consultation with city anddstate agenc:i.:.
The 1'D8I911i tude of these discharges' shoUld' ~t be""' a 9roblen, due to
their small vol\m!S and low concentrations'. " " " ,.
" -"
*
*
The implementation of the contairment alternative can be expecte4: '
to contribute to~ a: redu:tion in' t.'1e" ,publ~ic health" risk assoc:iatect . "
wit.~, direct contact: wfth the wa~~~~~., ~O'., or '; ~; - ~. c - n .~.c,'
Potential negative Unpact arises from the fact ~~at the. wastes. are,
not permanently destroyed or L"!IDObilized, nor removed from:'the"':site.
*
* Cleaning"- of wooded= areas;; oii...sfte" Would 'detra-ct ft1:Jf.f v~,sU91" aest.,etics
- of this'. s:1 t~,. HOWever', -limit'inq:~e CaP::t9~"~J~ at~as~ of"', .
IJnacceptable contaafina€10n :.ai:!7Shown i:1" Flq~~.. .4-," M~ni~iZa$; the
disruption of existi"g vsgetation, and reduces""t.'Hs impact-.
:-.=. -:1~~'~-:. ~ - .:'~~ ~:~-:..~"!a j-:~;f <:)(},: ,?:-gr ~-ij . .:;~= :~. ~.. F; -. --
. - .: _'.LOA :;-r-:~ .,-i:::r-" ~~.,.. .s': i.a;'~~ ~-:..: "'7i-:~- ~.~l ~r:z. -..";
TaOles~ 3-~C ahfj:;1J=o2 S:-~!fj;ze-~.=os~!~s~i~ta~':;:_'~,:-;~ "~- ;1~.~$~gt~~~-:Gfr ."";. ~:: ~,;.~ ~.o : 5aoq;t;-i~ ~~ '.::}f:S j~- - _i ~~:---
7he..'t:.~~13;tte1~t al:ernati'/e :",ould invol'/e JesulJct.ioo of Ot3anic
conta.'ttinant$i:~ah(i::seoa~eitSn ~af ~tils fro'; tfie:-,~"n:S',-"~nd~ WOuld: li:<~l 'I ~
~sed' uEOn:_:ij~fY~~~J#Y:~~ncH?OgY~' ." Ho~il~r~", ot:~e~: ~rt~!'J~a f~16rJsshould
i1so ~"-~~:~~~~~~1;Xn;);.'1~',:desf;h"2?n~e~ ~-- ~!~?rii'.a:Y-"i4:\~t~]~~ti~ri 09ti-'ns
u~er' t.~is' altetnative;:',«)u!d=5e=- (1:) -oil-sfle "f~ciC1eraticn 'utilitio9' ~
transportable' ~i ln 'oo.:i~neri~ f'.J.1fcn :wou~d{~bt!':'~QSt;Uc;~~~~n1~q~~eed on-
site for, t."1e duta~i'on=6f~t.~e-cfe~riup ~ffore'~a~d'-- pr~~~EQi~ati,ori of
e:.ccavat:ed ~terial$ to ~n <)ff-3i ta ::7~~~~.:t:::at~~ b€i~erat:or :acfli to].
Included as a :J,3seli:1e in ::1is '1'::!:~ll .11~rn;jti';~ ~s t:."~ su~o?ti')n -,e 0::-
~it~ -:1is?,sal of all e:
-------
Remaining Fill Area -.^
Barrier WalMOption)
v
Subsurface)
S/B Barrier Wai
anage
tOitcn
Clean Out and Dispose of
Oeoris m Drainage Ortch: Repair
Banks as Necessary
Fill TnicHn«sa: Gr««t«f Than 10 F««t
Monitor W«N
TtttPH
Cap Area
Drain ^X
1 men • i30P««t
FIGURE ^ ALTERNATIVE 2 - CAP/3ARRIER WALL CONTAINMENT
-------
:" :
DESCRIPTION
: QUANT I TV
: UNIT COST, ,
a[[[a...
TOUL COST. .
"ul ti lIY.,.
: - g,.lnull,. bll', U8-
: - 1~. ~''''''Ibility jail, 248 -~
(p.,....bility (10 c8/1.C)- '~:.-
: - Iynth.ti c Ii n.,. ,32,0,.000 ,.-f. : ,
: - d,.lin,. I..,.,. (I:~~d), 128 : ' ci
(~.r"lbi1 i ty )10" C8/1'C-):,,:'~-: .: e~1if
: - ,.ot'ltil. #IIU.tc:; 320,OOQ,:.I;""'"
~. ~t;
<18,8 #i 11, .. t~lf'-!gq). - - :-;~ . '!(, ~
3 : &al V.~t~~" . ~:~, ~~:":.~,_~jr'-~~'~':'12- t~l~- . '00/.10.'
, _: ~~','. - :j,.C~~.- '~~:"':';':'-':"1 - ,.::../: -'. .
4 : MIU't"C. ta'(:;- ':'. P~c~>~~>'~~~~~,Lft -; --",
: a SOll./I.ftt.,IUt,l t. Sly,..""" WI'1J=~'"..----,,, "~'''_A''': ,~-,4 ' , I
"0. . . '- '. -r.z.: ..- 4. ~ _.? ~ --._.;-.c;~ .. -c:. -_.... 0"-'; Jf .
: - lou,~hO _li,cS''',-~ '~~,f!i:..a&:-':"e;~~:;:,;,..~~~;"O~'-<~>.jf. :', -'~ 81 ~;f :
: '- '11.t. lid. r 4;1:0 ft::-I~:::3"...:::f..t~-?L~~: ':-~"'-tf;--'3"'Qp'~ f .' :. B 1 .f :
: - ...( It~tf;;~~q~~ft,t,~~i~:S;~f;;tb~~~~!, ,;O,t:~~. f. : ;.,-~8;;r1~ :.
n~,.t'."r~il~!~~7~~ f~£~~~r~~~~~~'I~f. ~/ 11/1f. :
(1 ,,~.1~.~d'~~5~'~'~ b:~.~.tt~. *~~1~--=-.~..0.:~~~. >..;:):j~ . ~I I
~ ..._- - .,...J'::._..""...~"F~" --~':C~.f_~ ~ , I
':-:~ ~ ~ ('~i ~ {;:;";;7=':""'~j~~~t;.::..:r-''--./''''' I
: ° t'It'~ji~~i>~~"~- -----=-.~5~~.:r: .d': :
: - la~~:"T?~~j?~;~-Wi!i;~~.r2~?'. 3. : 1 , 1 00' '1'. :
: - ..,t~':l~.~'J..i':::'r:",i,,,~')~-..::"{~~;i;;":';':~~;~Y : 11 : 1 t 100 'I.,~c~ ;
: - d:'.' ,~,:d(;~~':':'::?,;~::,:'~'i;:/:.'";,:7:. ': -",:t<1
~ : D..I t .re :'Ct 'p!.cti.d'j-..~..-*r ii~~a[n.'::~' -.
-,' ,..c:av,,,.,:_'m.8p,':ttt"'''81i;-:<. T-===--=~I"='=-=~~6' :;~::1:-=
. : R."'d..}~~;.~i.~j({~~Z:$i-:~~-l;f~_::' .: ; -3', soo I~=;'.:J: t ~ ~~h;!9j~.>~~ ~~
~ ~ '~ i1'1' -,:"\ '.c'i" ...". C'"""'-'" ,
- ~ +' ..~,,-:~'tCtj.;'$~ijC C'~~c ' ~y:-~:;: ~~-f/~'. ~~';'4~~a:-~n;).~~4-! ~~f~ ~~j£'. 1
7 : Cl..,., ct".inlq. .~,~:tc:.t( ,(.as~--:\.n"""i"'" -"'C", ,: 2,010 c:. y.: .'~(~C;..,.y!~M.:
.o;.;.o'~" -,...d,.J:. -l5t~:c.. _~I~- -n ,.,.. ~ ~ --,.u-
: A 1 t.,. n at i 'I', 1) . .-'r'.T~~-..r,.'1> ,.", ';~',",,'" : J '""0..1) 'r;.l'. -=- '
'0 ,~~,t:;t~~~a ~ "'~' ~- :.~-.. ~.,. '-'
I .. - I
1w I 3e~l::\. ::;Z:r- G.~...;~:t::
I a: "onitar ._,...'ils (insid.lnd outsld. --=~2~t:'~ -~... E:~'O'OO=t'8~-=-<=:"""'"
I SIB ..11) . ~...,.~~~:==-==-~::5 :
I : 8....... . . . ............... .. .. . . . . .... . .. ...... . .. .. . ... .ii'.~'ii ...~ ............ .. .. .... . .
SIt'. Cl.lrlng
o grlsslAnd,
: 0 tr..s
b"ulh
&. 1 AC.
1.3 iCe
1,SI)01.c:. '
2,000/IC.
2 : CI~ Conltruction
: I.
~1~ha1t s
g,.lnula,. bal.
Ilphllt - 08
3','00 I.y.
,
I
I'
,
18/1. .,.
- 128
, I
.
: b.
Concr.t.
g,.Anullr b.s.
Ilphal t. - ..
3',SOO I.y.
22.70/sy
- 12.
-, .
: c.
3','00 I..,.
-36".y.
: -
:.-~ .. ..:r-
- -
. -~--~-, ' ._--.rA,aL,E-,-~~,\-_~-
~;;..-..,...-.,.
~ -- Cl~_::'--
". , .
-:"' -.
.- -.....
4:1'....
,-
- ~,"
.'
jJ
1
,q .18 ~
S2,&
(I
II
'lt39,000 (b
S81&.~/)O
S1 ,278,000 (I
~.
..~.
.It.OO.o
"2'2.000 (a
1:11 4 ! a 0 t) ! i
';1 So! aoo
-------
.... - . ..,...rI
,i ....... _..' ..,..., ,\ I
:.--....i"'~",
."'''' ~ I"'\, ...: ~
-- ,"w",,",,'I'Ic;."'i
TEM : DESCRIPTION : QUANTITY: UNIT COST, S : TOUL C057, S
Z:.8[[[
: Enqin..rlnq ov.rlit. p.rlonn.l
: through i.pl...nt.tion Ph'I.(2
: ' p.rlonl, 1 Y.ir')
4,000
';S/hr.
U80,000
10 : Suboptionl
: Subaptian . - Sit. e1..ri"9,
: 8ulti1,y.r e.p, S/9 ..11 on lauth,
: "It, north sid.l, g'I v.ntl,
: de..i.ring of p.rch.d zon.,
: rlv.g.t.tion, cllir dr.in'9' diteh, :
: 8onitor ..111, .ngin..rI4v.rtight.
'2,021,600
I
"
: Suboption b ~ Sit. e1..ring,
: .,ph.lt e.p, 5/8 ..11 an louth,
: "It, north lid.s, 9.1 V.~tl,
: d...t.ring of p.reh.d zon., ~
: r.v.g.t.tion, el..r dr.in.g. ditc.L-:
: 8onitor ..111, .n9in..r/ov.rlight.
11,970,000
. I
,
t'.
"
k
I
.
.
4 ~- .
: Note: 1)' For eaner.t. c.p, .dd
: S177,~OO to luboption b. 2) For
: ..11 an ..st lit., .dd '1S6,800
: lith.r lubaptian.
"
f,--
l'
. 'J,-
.' ;q:£. lL .
SLI.;:
to
:~
. ! .. :
~
. .~.-,:
~ .. -:;:F--:- -
I
. ~ ~ ;-.
,
04t-"i ;'~ %"" . - -...;..:a -",:, .:
I .
I~ . ~~v ::' -,' ';
,
.
I
It'". ;0; ....
1e:;".{:,
: ~obi1i:.tion/D..abi1izltion ,<22%)
: Construction ..n.g,.,nt, sit.
: lervic.,
: .. subop ti on .
: b. suboption b
,I
..,,~
~. ~~!i ..
I
, , .
, .
"'-'0')' .,..
- : +, :; ': "~ S!ir1 0 , 15 O.~:
1434 ,8:0'~
. -',\ - : - v
12 : TeclH'ology r!lp.l':!ln~.~ion,f,
: d.signs, p1.nl, sp.cificlrion~~
: r.gul.tory approval, i"su~."C~
: t:onds. ~Irilits (221)
: . . I U bop t ion I, ~
: b. .Ub..ti.~~~~~:f~~
1 3 : 0 v.,. n. & d It'~ :"to~;!,,~,~("!O'P~:{'~:- .
!:: :~::~~:~:~t:~i~~~; ; m'"< ,.: :;: "'~:~~; :;~~
t4 : CQntinq.r'!CY (2~1~~~~ " u_.-- -----:'------._----~-_L----_'__--_H--_':-' _--n~"---
: I. sub~ption I . ifl,," ~.. . -5. '!9::~~t:;1}::'~6 ,." -... :~. -.: S~~~,,~OC"
: b. suboption b : : ."~~'. -..I.e. ,.::S~9""l~O"
1~~ti~
.
... 'I,,,
-.'..; ~.~J.
I
I
~.:
-------
ALTERNATIVE 2 - PRELIPUNARY ESTIrtATE 0' Op.ERATIN6 AND "~INTEHAHCE COSTS -- CONTAIN"EHT~
, ,
[Tell! :
DESCRIPTION
a[[[
J
1 : Sleu~ity inlpletion, qu.~t.~lYI B
: hr/eye1.
2 : "onito~ing - ~ ..111 .n.lylle.l
1~ ..111, ..t.~ l.v.l only
I 0 L.bo~1 ,..plin9 S ..111 .nnuilly
30 hou~, pl~ eyell
: 0 An.lytic.l: VOA/INA/..tll,
S ..111 plus bl.nk/du,lieltl
: 0 Explnsll, InnulI
~ : "'Iintlnine.
: 0 FlnCI rolpli ~
: 0 VIg.tltion eont~ol
4 : Rlporting/docu..ntltion
: 0 Llbo~: qUI~tl~ly insplction
2 h~/cyell
: 0 L.bo~ - Innull 9~ound ..t.~
.onito~ing 24 hr/eyell
5 : Oplrating pO.lr, ,..ov.l of
: plrehld ground .Itl~
: 0 Illet~ie USlgl roltl
: 0 sirovie' connlction
b : SlJotot.l
7 : Ad.inistrIUv. (.UI,),. ,.,-,.',..,
8: Contlng.ney (z~!f~'~J~~
9 : ANNUAL TOTAL,- (~cuft;CI"'d.)f: ~..7::t.,;'
10 : Pro",nt .o~t~f'.{-~~:'~':~:~:'l~:,~~':':
: QUANT ITY
: UNIT COST, .
: TOTAL COST, S
...r
32 h~.
3S/h~.
30 h~. 3S/h~.
7 9S0/1.
: Lu., su. SOO
I'
I
"
I
2S0 ft/y~
3S, SOG/I. y.
r 6/ ft
f~.24It.y.
I' '.,; .,
I
I '
I" "
~~. -:::"",,1.:. .
. ~?
I' ~
I
,.
B h~'.
,: :~.~ '. .i~:~ =~. .
,:.. ~ :: -~.
1- - '-'-o! ~r; -:' .
I
3Slh'~.'
.' .
I.. '
I
I
.. I
24 ~I".
3S/h~. .
"I.t~""'-
I-
I
I.. ... ~~
I
I~
." ":'..
..<". .';.
,
- '" . - .
. ...: ...
I
. : - . '.i'~ -~Od'!
I
.] ~~; f
I
11)
I1,OSO
S6,b50
'500
It , ~OO
. '8,S20
"~-
>
. 1280
1600 Ic.-"~ : O.063/1c.-"~
:' ~.: :, .~!07'larftn-' .:~::.:: ,;. '.,
t-".,1~~.'t~.=~~.~ .-J :,..."t},,~a-:
. , , '
~:,<1.c.:'~{J'iH ! .f;VQ"t'j.,<;b S'2\J,~Q";
,:,:,~.'i3'; .\,!:-~';
I
~ " ~: : r.J-o-tJ~
~ .~ .-tJ~ .:";J~
'.
SlOl
S 1'02
~S3,100
. " ? . Ii -~.; ; !
I
: . .5',170
1. .. ., ~ ...~, ~ ".. -.
j
- ~""'" ....
: "':.:'1~';'-~
I
',29,930"
I 1247,930
- ~:- ' " ~,' - :; - -
-~-------_._~-._._.__..~~-------
-----~-----------------------------------------------------
~ssu..s 30 ,'ir, mllnt."~n~1 I..st.s l,ft in pliel...
-------
-lu-
9
The ther~l treat~ent technology ~ould be expecced to exceed source
control cleanup cri teria for the ~~enti Hed contaminants. However,
depending upon the configuration of the kiln and accessory equipment,
concern IDaY arise over a1 r emissions of volatile materials, including heavy
=stals. To 80.. extent, such emiasions will be controlled by flue-gas
devices such as wet precipitators or baghouse filters.
As an alternative, One of the kiln-based innovative technologies, such
as roasting, or chloride volatilization may be pursued 'further. The former
would noc separate metals fro~ soils, but would immobilize them within.
Since these are based upon rocary kiln technologies, their costs ~y, at a
conceptual level, be expected to be only slightly higher than conventional
incineration processes, due to the additional chemical or ~terial handling
equipment. Rowever, substantial investigatory/pilot work would be
necessary before selecting these altern',tives.
, {
All waste materials would be excavated under this alte.macive. Since
excavation along Lombard Street will expose the face of the remainder of
the fill which continues to the north" stabilizatiott and capping, of this
face would be requi red, both as an inte_rilll ,pro.t.ecti ve 'lDeasure during,-
excavation, and to prevenc' futurelnte~act!on 6etween ~hose wastes and the
treated area~ on-~i tee Temporary structural support__of the exposed face'-!:
~y be required ~oprevent ,colla:pse of ,the; r,oad base:., -
- -.. - - . - - ~""-'''.~ - ,
The~g~~eral' outU'ne:-to a ttierul~t:r.alt_n~ itof t~,:::~~~t~d LoIII,bard: "
site would'-incl'ude the_- fotl0w,t:ng' o.£-:rat_~~~s:",;::: " ,'~'}'~~ - '
* rtemoval ot' the', clecin- ~or1:i6rt~t €f!st-fn{ ~p. ~ 'tcf~bI-s~ave-d' :-for ~e~
burl-a 1. :: -: ::.o~'- ~ ":~,. -:: ~'=- - - ':;f''3 -::. ,- .::::; .~:: .--s,,- ,.--::~ - :c' " .-
,,,-" ~ .6~: '. ...;Ct: ~)u': 1.t::- - ::"~ ::;::;9':' ~~.f- - :';~j-: :..-::
~"
:.r,
- .- .
-::. -!... ....:
* Exca'li,itron of'--f1Ir~ p'r~$" ..:io-nt'amiif~i:~"J sub~:'dilS:~ :--":~rr '- '.
:.. ~ - ~ _. ,- ~~ -:6- . ~ ~ ::-: ~ J--~cZ.i..~a --.~!~-. ..-:_-~.;~ '~::... :J~~--". - <.. :;';...i- : ~
* S;tabi 11 zati"o;n--ind' :~ap-p?~C6"f :;*Posal of c~nl:,1~i.n.:itp.d residue!'!.
)ff-~it~ ~C~A land-
*
~learin~ of the dr~inaqe ~itch ~long I:he eas: ~tJa
f)f t:le si:~.
*
~!ake\lp ~iick:ill (i~cl.u\:i:\,~ !:Or) .;oil), :;:,,~Jil1{ "l11d
\/e;;et,ltL )rt.
-------
~
~bile ~~is evaluation is based pri.~rily upon rotary kiln technology,
there are other incinerat'ic", processes under develot;:ment which :nay warrant
consideration in the implementation phase. One such process is t.'1e infrared
incineration process which may present the capability for substantially
higher throughput rates. Canpatibility of this equipaent with the wastes
present at the ~ and Lombard site would require investigation.
I~lementability
The ability of incineration to destroy organics identified at the Erane
and taabard site is reasonably certain. Of somewhat greater concern is the
ability to recapture metals fram the flue gas and prevent or minimize air
emissions. The present;:e of chlorinated organics ~y also require the use
of wet neutralization"equipment (caustic scrubber) to minimize emissions.
In sum, the basic incinerator t.,":Iuld likely be supplemented by t:.'1e incorpora-
tion of a secondary canbustion chamber, caustic scrubber precipi tation!baghouse
fil ter and other appropriate devices. A trial burn would .likely be needed
to determine the nature of the off-gas, and obtain necessary. air permits.
A major consideration in determining the feasibility and cost
effectiveness of incineration i:s the. material t:hro~tz::ate of the
system, and the BTU content of the material being 6~.~-" ~ on-site s~,il
materials are likely to have a nE{gllgible BTU and high asp c:pritent and .-
therefore may be a costly material to incinerate. Truly mobile {i.e., :,'
trailer mJuntec1L ,systems ~e limi~ by._thesize'of,_.theinci~ator...i-tsetf,
and' have limited ~capaci ty, on -the or~r' of toris"of sOl;1d ~ste' per hour'.
For this reason, a fairly large acale iriciner'ation project'fike the Fane
and UJmbard site.'NO.uld invo.lyeth,e erec.tiOJl,-on-sAte. Q.f;~tr~r~le
iocinerator compbnents; at the "'end cif t:ne projeCt,'-the~ system wQuld be
disasser.tbled and re:noved. Throughput :ates in such a system :~y'be in t.~e
area of five tons per- hqqr. Pe~ent j.pst;411.ation..s\.u;p .~ .wo~ld exist at
anoff-si te TSD facirrty::~;":,-I"':' ~......~;.;" ~":::;-'~f! .:..:-"5. -
'"." ~-.~'..~~:if~"- } .:""J - (~.£~ ~tJDr; OjL:~ .. ~i' ;J'V :.~,i':J -~ ~B~;~~..' i.~ to!, .=.: -: ,:';.;:: '. 1 .
~;(c~..jatiorr.9~ 1;'i~, (1 r~ :t1i1t~r l.~.~~..at. ,.t;1~..:\ane ""n;'tr~\1bard ~31.te ',-11. ~ ~
~Pllcatedha b..'.Y...'~. n..-~~~Qs~{U1,~ej,~~o~$~1~ ~~t}i.~~l...o¥~:~~~;~~~onsl '
Known to, i, .:~-" -".'" ~', . :;J.i-... UCu \AI ~ Wl. no - on. y maKe. I;,ua --I.~a
excavati:~ni;;~i~j~A;~f'i~'~t;:~~n,~Q!J~
-------
-12-
a
;'1
Effecti ';eness
*
This alternative might be expected to exceed the applicable SARA
based source control criteria and result in permanent site
remediati~n requirlng relatively minimal post-remediation main-
tenance .
*
t.ong-tem involvement wi th the site after closure would be
r~lativelyli~ited.
Short-term i~pacts are likely to arise from ~'e incineration
process itself, wi~, respect to potential air emissions.
The ability of the incinerator off-gas cleaning devices to ~t
applicable air'emission standards should be addressed during
the design and trial bum phases.
*
*
Even with the probability of !tEetinq air pollution standards, .
this alternative could meet with sane degree of local or comnunit"j
opposition during the actual implementation-. This' opposition' 2Y
be largely overcome by effective public education effort concerning
the air emissions', and by'demonstrating' the pemaMnt' natUre of ~e,
cleanup effort. - - ~:~ -
~: I"
*
Since this'alternative reSults in' the' off:'site.:aisOOsaf of:'at: leait-,' ;C~:
.. ~ _.. .
SQ,. materials (the pr&-sorted debris which cannot be incineratedr, ,,-
all such materials ~t go to a facility which is' per.uitted and
operated in accordance wi th Federal and State hazardoUs wa~te dis-
posal :equlations. - ~thermste'" the shipment" of:- ;1IaEe'ria ts to those
facili ties must' be.: performed:' in': accordance' wi t.'1' $tate' arid C:-E"ederal
Department of Transportat16n:c. (DOT)' regulations- fOi- shiPment, .
handling, and tracking of hazardous wastes.
.. "..c ': - --.'£!7/ -.'';:' ...... - - .-.t.: -'.i.:'.~.--'",- :
1-'.'
-:~..
*
This alternative is likely to result in localized, short-te~<
i:!!pacts ty.picad;~ of:- a:fhea¥d:)ns~ruCtion project';: "";]' t.I1' ~~5pect
. . - ~ ~ ~in -qrOI.1l'1~,-" ,.:.,.' --~ '';C-:
:. 4. -.- - -.
. :.;S~ ~ .-~ ~- :.-"-
*
!n addition to the 'un~rtain:eff~ti~feness wi€., respect -to ';rol.md
'Natar re:~edia:hn,. t.~e 7'tential ~:-'::ucad :ro:n t.,e i:1cl:1er:itor '1ust :)P. ,::ot1si;,!.ared i:'1 t.,eir ,H~~)c)5a~. .
-------
Cost
-
An e,,'~luation of costs associated wi th this alternative is coneained
in Table 4-1 and 4-2.
Altemati.,e 4. -'Excavation/Extraction
Tbis alternative involves excavation of contaminatea fill materials
followed by an extraction (soil washing) process to separate contaminants
from the soil, leaving a product sufficiently decontaminated to per~t on-
site reburial. Implementation of this alternative would involve the
following major operations:
. *
*
Removal of the clean portion of the existing cap, to be saved for
reburial.
*
Excavation of contaminated fill and subsoils.
*
Staging of excavaced materials in ~ cleared'are~ of the site.
*
. .
Stabilization/capping of exposed fill fac~alang Lombard Street.
..
Presorti!)g for removal of large debris and,.of'f-si!.te disposal of '.
de bri s.. Debri sremoval is requi red to avoi d. damage co equi pment '-~
*
Screening/-chani~l shredding to achieve:. unifonP s1II8U:.fragments.
*
... -, .. _..... .
-._:.... --~ .:G.. .. -
tJrocessing.-'of shredded was-tes in "~oiJ- was:n. equ1pment~..: .-'
*
...~ "- .vi . .~- ~.~
Treat~nt of wash. str~ams~ bY,::"'pp'rop~ate technology=: (sudr.'.as
reverse osmosis. or. C:art?~~~bs!,rp~f1;9,t\'h.~ Wash, wate;r~will.:be." recycled
to the wash: proce~~.L wi ~h ca~cen~r"~.e-lr~g~nerat1;t ser.eallb IH)~ di spasa!.
- z. ~/:'4;,;;;:.:5~' .:: ~
:~:::~
- .-.,..", -
.... - - -".
~ - ...
*
~ampling of washed materials co verify adequacy of treatment.
.... - '" ." ~ ~ -~.-.~C;~' ~ ~. -,', , ~.."
. "';"'-, ~'::..;- ~ -: i :: - ~J2 -:"; ......... :..; '#... :: ,~ .. ... -- - - - - - -
On-si, t~ ~ ~!~~~!.i~ -:"l'f ~,!e~~~:~~_e~'ia~sf!!?::~ecess:i.rYi ~~l1p::.e,t.tl tl') be
o~t;JI'\~d I')tf'7si~~:"i' .;':;~~f.' ~r""" . :~::::.::;: :~;~, 06 :.-r . ~': .:.';', ::.
. -..:- - -:-'~5- ;..;= :;~":;,5ftL: fm6 ~;~t.: :a .;~a9~ ~ l:b~ :'~b-e..;~:: - :=:£.:
* Reburial of clean cap materials.
- _~~;2~T~t..3. J!~f.r:.~,..~,::c :):J .Js~::ec:~:::-9 '?: ;"~~ori:~ 9~l.i;;r~'""'5': -~ ~.;.~~:- ...
* C;~!;~.~'~;ifg!";:;~~~~i1~f~~ntg!-A~h?~!Ql1gr'tae1:eaaC.L&tda~l)f::t'hei'9i te.
," Zt~-,: [:4~'J~,~~~~~:~f:~tf~i;~r~~"-~':-~'Pt-; :~-:~X9 :...:: -~-.i3 ~s~ f! :.i:t~::~:~~r' ~=~~-
*.. Cra41~g:(ieM'.g~.1:,~ti~lon... ~:.. c: ':- .: ~ ::.- .~. - - - ~ .
ronleaant~:!t!:1~~!51:~' " ,:~ -- - :::.~:'~, ~~~~:~::z~~- ~"'~~:~::.-
* Should::~t!~=,~am~f1 ng,p~ograrn _tt:\di cate;. that\:c~" tam1'l'\'at'lIort' ;,tn- some
EractbJns has' not been sufficiently reduc,ed, off-':Jt~t'.a:"ritsrstjsal
may ~ re'1uired. Should che I/I')lu::te ()f ~l1ch ~a:~:."t,d:3 prf)';!! !:() ~)t!
subs tan c.Lt.le, :tny p~t~!\.t. i'~' J;,"-,:td v..s!'\>t3.gt! -');CtL:: ~'t:$ :1'pp r;).t':;l':~"JV~ r:. . di to: ~ t
~:n -'!.nd di~~!1o:i:'i~~.'.11')'11tl.I:t.~~1.:' ~;.:'los;t..:':''':':'-s.:-:-. -'..
:II'
--
..
. -::-'~~;-: ~ -.
.. ..
_. .,
. -.... ~
....
~"';. - ....~
. .
.
-------
"
A~TERNArlvE 3 - PRE~I~INARY ESTI~A~E, ,CAPITA~ COST -- EXCAVATION/INCINERATION
'1
..
IrE~ : DESCRIPTION : QUANT;TY : UNIT COST, S : TOT~~ C~Si, i
- [[[
I
I
: Excav.tion
: CII.t: overburdln (cl,1 (11"1 for
: r,burlll>
: Cont..ir..t,d fill .nd subsoil
I
-,
2 : 'r.sbrt debris
: D1SpOI.I in RCRA fill
3 : Fill dispos.l option.
: (9',900 c.y. . 121,400 i-em 1
: SU80PTI~H A - OFF.SITE DISPOSAL
: 0 dlSpos.1 in of~-'ite RCRA l.ndfill:
: a b.ckfill, cle.n fill
: Subtot.l Subption A
SU80PTIQN 8 - OFF.SITE INCINERATION I
I-
I
: 0
: a
. I
.
tr.nsport Ind incinlrltion
blCkfill, cleln fill
: Subtotal Option 8
: SU80PTION C - ON-SITE INCINERATIO~
: 0 ",chinic.l shredder, 1~ t/h,..
~ a Inciner.tion in tr.nsport.bll
': InClnerlter unit
: a Off-site .sh disPol.I ~RCRAI
: Q Tnt n9 -a~. incine,..tl( wl.'te
for reburi.l, one SI8PJ, plr
'00 co. y. (YaA/8ItAJ"",t.),~l
:' a Rlbu,.I.11 an....:i:l.~i.f::'lncln,."lt.d
f .. t.,. i I.{ -('I,.lij..~::3.~~5~-~,;,,;~:a-1 U.I
r educt i a,ft. Otf:~I:n:ct~.,,.:i:t:ro~r
: - a C 1 e. ft ..'k 'UP.:j:gl:.~';;X?~;.:~~}l'
: Su b tat. f O'p t i a'" -C:' ,'.,- --~ :. ::'j.'( :,'
"
I
I.
I
4' :'" C. pIc ant. i nile:. t 110ft 9 ~ a . tu r ct
: Street fill f.ee
: Concrete or .sph.lt c.p
-: Grading/Vagltatian
- . .' - . .. -
b :-Cll4r drainaql dlt,c:n (as 1n
:.,~\tfrnitlv, 2)
,
.-
I
'..
121',400 tan, ("
100,680 c.y. I:::.
,
.: .:::":: ~.". :o::~(?
~.: ~.
.
I
,
, -
00~0 c.y.
It/e.y.
S/C.Y.
IS/e.y.
230/c.y.
1 7 3! to"
1~j cr.'Y.'
- -
: 't.....
. ~ -.1. - -
306/ton
, 12/c.y.
., 1; .ri -
~ ~.~
'.
u..e.~
:.iJ~ ~ .... :.. - J
tans 1e_:j,J~{ton -
ton, :9f_,jo~;0!~an
I
I
I .
, .,
'''''
- ~ ~.' ..
I-
.- ,
'24,200
1473, l~O
S10,q~0
U ,087,900
121,1)02.200
U,20e,lbO
'22,210,300
~
-
137,148,400
s~,20e.l:0
I
':.. ..
~.
:!. s~a,3'c,~oO
I
... ...j
I
, .
I
.. .. .
I
-,
'1,821,000
, .,4,290,000
t-
_'~{j t :
.
,
1 r3lton~ . ,,: . " . ;")-
1,000 8..
'2;,060
s:OO,:)OO
I
, iue~~~~ ~~~~~~~C
,. I
4@ljGq~ft~~"i :;:~~'-.
I I
. c-.~ ~-G~i,. ." . ~ ~: .3; ~ - ..
I S.OO/e.y.
12/e.y.
p
S314,~OO
. -
S4~3, ::0
I
~~f-'~ ~ :. j- 0 'i;ift1.. <#' ";) - ..-
I I
'\,e:.!£~~-~ ~1~. ~- -~_r
, ,
I I
- I
........-<11>-;:11 .-.1
- . -. .,.:--.c. -
,-- . C'~~", - ", ",or, .-, ~. ---..:..!""_,~ "-~- .- -.
94,030 c.y.
4,730 e.y.
4,730 c.y,
121,400. tOftS :,
100,080 c.y. :
I
I'
121,401)
1~1,400
,-
I
I
"
100 tan
, 200
-------
ALfERNATtvE 3 - PRELI"tNARY ESTt~ArE, CAPfTAL COST -- EXCAvATtON/tNCINiRAT10N
i!
~
: HE" :
DESCRIPTION
: QUANTITY
: TOTAL COST,
\
I..
: UNIT COST, .
[[[~.....
1 I "onita~ ..111
. I
1
9 I Eftg1ft..~iftg aY'~lit. p.~sann.l
; t"~au,h i.pl...ntltion phi.' (2
: p.rsonl, 3 Y'I~I .ach
9 : Subtotal (round.d) bll.d upon fi 11
: disposil options (Ill oth.r it...
: c:a..on)
: '~bopti on A
.; Subopti on 8
: Subopti on C
I
I
1
I
- Off-sit. dispoSJl I
- Off-tit. incin'~ltion ;
- On-9it. incin.ration
10 : ~abili%atio"/D..ebilization 122~)
: Conlt~uction .Inlf...nt, sitr
: 'w.I-yie..
I
. ,
: I.
: b.
Off-sit. dispes.l
Off-lit. incin'~ltien
On-lit. incin.ration
: c.
G .0<'
I'
. '
11 :. T.chnology I.pl...ntltion,
: d.signl, pl.nl, sp.cificltianl,
; ".gulltorYlp'p~o"ll, i nlurlne.
: bends, p.r.its (22%)
: I.
: b.
: C:~
Off-sit. dispesil
. ,. ~.oQ .
Off-sit. incin.ration -
Oft-sit. i~cin'~ltion: !~~:
.,...J"
.' '. t- ...,.
"I " .J ~
't)'(.; d . .~ ~1,l
,
,
,.
~~1 :'OJ
. .
~: : :.,.,."..cs .nc!' Pro11t (lOll
.... ; 1.', . : .
o-a::: .
,.
I
I I. .Off-li t. di 1'01&1 . "
: b. Off...it'd;",c~""r~:t.~Ii~~;; .
: c:. On'-I1 t'l,~t~.C:~~~:.~.;~i.it'f.~'<~
~. . ':-..." - :>~'''' . r'. }::;~ '-~...:
. '~~-':'~'- '~,~ .< -
l3 : Conti n,.ncy,,4;(2~'~)~?'i;:', ", .~:, -
: . :~..~:::~::;;:j;~~~:;;L:'~\':-'"
: . . t' .. f - t rt':.ft,.j,o,~~l;~'::!-i;Y'
: b. r.H.;.sit. i"C'i"nlrltion
: c. 'In-tite incin.ration'
. ..
,
. .:,;; . -.. ...
-"f -
.
:;. ;~ ~
I
.1-
I;'"
I
14 : iOTAL (round.a)
: I.
Off-'it.di~pas.l
Off-ut,. inclntrltion
On-Sit. lnCln.r.tion .
f ~
I
~. . ~ =:
I
: b.
: c:.
5
5,000 .1.
'2',00'
I '
12,000 hr.
45/hr.
'540,OO!
I
1
I
,
,
,.
,.
1
'24,992,101
'41, 199,201
J29,939,20(
I
, .
,.
, .
.,
,
I
"
,
I
,.
'.
~.
,
... .....' ~ ~~
, ,.
,
.~: '5,490', .)5!
:: :.'"", Ob3, 82t
1 ..t '6~,5_8' ,o2r
,/'
,'.
.
,'.
~
_.',"
".
I
. ~ :1i11 , ','~:
,
I
. J .
.
to
- n ~ .
" ~... .
- .. - -
'5,no,O~i
1]
'9.,003, a2'
'o,~Sb,~:
, I
.' .. .f. ... '9 .:. ~ ~ .. ~ {; ..- -; ~
1 . I
f" . j&:~d..:.a"t: ~... ~. - "!::o: ... - .,./ . ~
. l' - ,
. .., , '. .I. - ':it..~ . '., ..
. I
;\~::R' ..be~-:-f ~, ~q~ ~. '} - ~
. - - I
. - t .
:}j/H\.~lg!v'f)...(}n-i;).H '0 ,:'\ "~9 :..
~g~ ~'t'fiC.&,C (}:--: ~~u-'-"",;~.fil, ..~~
: Ii- tfi t':<~'\ !2t'tta' ~ev ' I:. . ~'2, 498, 21l
~0 "[>"0" .J..,' .~ .,>0' .,J ::"'~~1r.
-------
~NATIVE 3 - PRELI"INAAV ESTI"ATE OF OPERATIN& AND "AINTENANCE COSTS -- eXCAVATION/INCIN,
TE" :
DESCRIPTION
: QUANTITV
I
1
: UN IT COST, I
1
I ,
: TOTAL COST,
- ~..............................~[[[
1
,
o S.c:u,.ity inlp.c:tion, qu.rt.,.l y 8 hr/: 32 hr. 3S/hr.
I
2 I /'tonitorinq - , ".111 innud 1 y - 0
. 0
I 0 l.iDor: U8plinq 30 hINt's p.,. cyel.1 30 hr. 3S/hr.
I
"
1 I'
I 0 And yti cd I IJQA/8NA/8.tdl 7 9S0/..
0
, ..11 I P 1 UI Ishn Ie I dup 1i c: it.'
S1,12'
Sl ,O~,
'0, b'l
: 0
Exp.n'.s
: LUlp IU.
I
,..
I
- I
~ :
"00
S~O(
3 : "Iint.nine.
1
,.
:.,
- I .
. I
I
.. I
, I,
I
,
"
. :.-r
I'
I
"
. I'
I
k
: 0 F.ne. ,..pd,..
: a V.q.tition eont,.ol
2S0 ft/y"
29,000 I.y.
111ft
O. 241 t~~y...,
I: -..' ..:.
- eo ~,~ .
..t,~O(
Ie, 97 (
. : R.po,.t ~ nCJ/Doeu..ntat io,,",'
::...: .:; :~."".
c
.~. -: ~::! -""-
- - ,..
o
, I
. '-. '''~.J
-~
-~ :. ~ ~_....~::
. ..,'
. .... . '-
, '
: a LiDO":' qUI~t:.,.lV i"lp.c~.io-n- .;-:: '-::1:--::: :'8' h'f!-'.,,_,,;-
2 hr:-/cye1..-, "0. .:-::: :~..; ,: ,: ;::~- :'"'- -..;i: :.;.
I. .~ ~: 3SlfiF;
S29C
:~ ~ - ~
.... -= --::,
: - ~ _.: ja;; ~;
.
': ~ / ~:........::{
. ! - .-. .. --
.
: 0 I..bo,. '- innual CJ,.ou~~~~.t;~
: tonito,.ing 24 h,./eyel. '
~ .~€r:1;fz,,:,
. -2.~J:I'I":,~:;:
I:; ,,: ;;~:3"S l"r . :;; , .
sa~(
~.~ ~ - :; ; <)'j
. ~~," G.:...:.;;'
. I
,
...
--:1~£.-
:"1;~:.:"~~C~ r;:':'.r-
. ..Z'..'::':'
5 : ANNUAL TOT~L~'("~QiQnd,.d),'~
;U(;
~:. _: ~:
. : £:~ i ~ ;c r: .:,.- '. ~ ~
~..~L 1- .,'-..:: ~. ~":;;~'- .
.
.,'
S19.~1
, I 0
. . - .... ('. .. r - -' -,..... r.- - ~ ;.,.. '1; -; ~-" . '~
it: P",s...nt-IfO,.t,!'t., ;.;,~'- ;ls:~:!;jI>t:' O:::"...:.9~1:gmC.~:;:' ..E>~"1.uC$~: .!L..<:! ..,a, ---, :' ~!:,::
.. ~- .,..._.,,~.... ". ",..-,r!.-- <"'_~.~~.r.'!!t'_~ J..!~~ _h~:!:!.~r:.~~ ~
- _.- --- - ---"'---..- -~~.- ~-~!4":1:..-:~-~=-~:=,:!!~'~~~i!-!!I'..!!P....~,..;.~ ._,-,-"""'--8!:~" . - ..-- --.....----- -- ~------ ---- - -- - - - -
-Allu..1 S y", 8.i.lttiftMC;~j~~;Jci,'~!~....djJatt,anl- r....d'riF'p'ttilu fltis1',"y y~'ir:S'~':
':';~l'II{:~~~r ", ~~:E ~:;<': :~' : ::: - '_: ~ -:'<~"::
. ~ ....- .- -: ~ - ~ . .- -. _.'.. """~. c ;:'z ~"!.G': :: £; -:~t?;}1S:: ~r:
'.~~ - -;. ~- .,:.! - ._~.... ,,---
--
- ..~.;- -......~ ,:;~ ~:;.' : - :.Esf':':-? ~ . :"7":::,~ -. "~""::':1..l' --:-f=~:;"
.
-------
. .,.
1:
!h~ process will likely resule in relatively small weight and volume
reductions in the washed materials (on the order of 10% for
contaminated soils washing) that would help to ainimize the volume
of makeup fill required; ho~ver, the total reduction in volume for
fill may be somewhat larger due to the removal of debris during
screening. ' ,
.
The process will result in a volume of final discharge wash water
for disposal. This water may be suitable for discharge to sewers.
Remaining technical uncertainties with respect to necessary
extraction solutions and effectiveness must be addressed in a pilot
test program.
.
Based on maee~al processing rate and pre-wash materials handling
req,uirements, the implementation phase of this technology is
, expected to last 2.5 to 3 years.
.
Implementation of this process involves, several relatively com-
plex unit ~perations, including presorting and shredding, the
wash process itself, the recovery and treatment of the wasn
solutions, and the need for testing of residual materials prior
to reburial. The applicability of all of these steps eo che, type~
of wastes at the Kane and Loll1bard si ce should also be examined:- .
in che pilot program.
, Effect! veness
; .~
- -. .~ '~FP:-
~~.;~- ~~:;. ~~.~~~.~.~..-: ~;.'
.
Soil washing/extra'ccion, has che potential for"'at'least -riteetrng; and
possibly exceeding, soil cleanup criteria. It can also be expected
to substancially reduce> t:he coneri butiort~ o,f"':tne;' [{ane 'iridutOmbard $i t~
to ground water concentrations of most of the identified '0 - -': ,-
contaJUinants; however, the poss1bil1ty of achieving ,ground waeer
c:leanup~oals by' thi,s- a~~ion cannot be a:d'ckessed1; , , - -\ -"~ '
~ .:....; \ .'1 ~ ~,~: ~ -. .. U : .4 ~
.
Treated soi Is ruy retain some low concent r.~tio"s of contaminants md
ehe '....ash solutions (501 ventj) may leach out i:t, tne 1';~Ij'tljr...r:~ ,'. ~. -
'if
:lhile off-jite 'reburial of some: treated ItJaceda1s coulcf"'c'otfcer:v~I9Pi~
be, req,~i.uA-,...t~ -t.r.a&t8nt-sftou.ld~ appreac:h"'che-s'cac'e'ct-go-ar-of -re~- ,,"
, d\f~P'~~\~~;~'~J~~;;~M~J~r: YOil~"'otf!ff4IC(!S9Qens~dered ,,~o~ '()f'f~~ce: "~ ,!<,
, ~~.~,~i~~~i~~f~J~~j,}~~-- ~ ~ ~. ~,~ .,
The'
-------
Cost
-
-1: .
'*
As c~is technology resulcs in per~nent 5ep~ration of wasces from che
site, long-term impacts and issues are likely to be limited to any
post-remediation monitoring required to assess ground water'
tmprovement and, detect reconcamination by penetration of
the barrier along the north boundary of the site. .
*
Off-site disposal of presorted debris, treatment process
concentrate streams, and any l~successfully decontaminated wastes
will require compliance with U.S. and State DOT requirements for
handling, transport, and tracking of hazardous wastes. With conven-
tional wash water treatment systems such as reverse osmosis or deioni-
zation, both the volumes and the concentrations of the concentrate/
regenerant streams can be quite high, and disposal of chese volumes
can add to the cost and complexity of the project.
*
Local discharge of final, tre~:~d, wash waters will require an NPDES
or local sewer discharge approval.
*
Since this alternative will result in removal of contaminants from
the si te, it !DaY prove ef fecti.ve.. 111 minimizing future th.reats to
public health and welfare ar1s~ng., f~om the' lCane and Lombard s1t:e:'."~~
. However. the perf'ormanc:e of the systea In _eting clean-up g~als f;
should be demonstrated prior~ ~~ !,,,,}ementatioq~ . '. ~':..' " .i.-f
. ~ . ,<" .~ :t .. . ; .;."'-, 1t ~ ~-.;-:,. .~6
'... :;#? ... ~ :. d
--:: - .. .; -~ . ~:; .:::. ...~..:} ~. ''':' -:';! ., '-- .;
" ~. -;.. .", J .~" ~ ~ '!: - .~, . "\;~ . ~ .; ,"
Cost evaluation Ear 1mpleMP.nt~tto~ of this alternative 19 ~res~nt~d in
Tables 5-1 and 5-2. w'hile the 90il wash process has "e.~t\;; ,,~:i~~ck ;\~ a.,(;,U,~i.~d;b<: ~ .
rtumber of t~stallations, the techn-icTlle 1's rel<1ti',ely new, ~nd th~ cost
of' 1~p1~!:lent.'ici.on, "at'ffce! ~ne~ and~ to~f:1d st ce 1'ta;r.~he,~~fE~;rli!ltt! J%"1es,q}.;lt.;, '!?,~ ;.;z'iL;' ,
: 4 t..' ~ -, '+ ~ ~ t ". :, ~ttfi ~ i ~~tt:g- .; ~ --; ~~{)-e ":~:; ~ :i2.Z~.~
AI ternatl ve '$.:",~:.,~n.;:,~t;C::~t;rr~a~ment (Vi cri f1 ca~l C)n~: '". :. ~ : ~"fl .:, - ij. zj~ <'''''' '. ~" . ~ "'6
-~- - ._~-:~':f~~~~~;~*~\::~:':~~~~ .; # ~,~- ~~I ~ :~_.~ ~ 4
'!'hi.s ai~~.'tn4t:~~~-~im'Pfo?ys .'in il1nO'l4Cive 90i1 tre4t~nt t~chnology,
'-~'" --;::, '; = 0 "....:., ,;...? ../';-"' .'--Y ,;",.;'::""";'--..::
vitd f1cac:f01Y..,:;',.ln~;':aikac;teriip.t co -'tchieve auequate contairtr.tent or treat:ne!1t " .
t)f contar.tt~~~~~#:=tF{)~~2t~~, ref\ui :e~e~~~ E~S e~ca""~5;,i,;)~,\ ;:lE :t11e(;t 'ol~;;,,~e;, }n~.~ ~. '.: <~.
';l1bsequent~;J:'e~~roject~d case..; :tre 'ior.te~Y'hat 1l\1CI!!:'t:,d.i\. t"lrth~r:'!ore 1 ..,.,. . .~"'-
;l"plicatioi'\ of ehe rroc~ss C) c:~e hi:~l)l:! '1etl.!r:<1~enec)l1s fi 1.1. ~3c~t't~i~':_- ,-'
:.lou.lde: re!1ui re i~vesti'.;at!)r~' ,'lnu "i t,-)t :-'~tuJi~c;, :1nd the cosf' :lnd 'ci~~!) re'll1i:f.J - -
Eor this de"ell)p~ent '..,orl< ~h:)Uld :,~ ~I)nsidp.reci.
. -
,- .
-.:.
.'"'" '.
-------
ALTERNATIVE 4 ~ PRELI"INARY ESTI"ATE, CAPITAL caST -- EXCAVATION/EXTRACTION
'DESCRIPTION : gU~NTITY. I UNIT COST,' : TOTAL COST, s
[[[
. I I
I I I
: Excavation
: 0 CI..n ov.rburd.n (Clp)
(IIV' for r.buri.l)
: 0 Cont..in.t.d fill Ind lubsoil
0,0'0 c.y. 4.00/c:.y. '24,200
94,030 c.y. '.OO/c:.y. '473,1S0
4,730 c.y. 1'.00/c.y. '70,9'0
4,730 c:.y. 230/c:.y. U,104,690
: Pr.osort d.bris
: Dfspos. in RCRA fill
: Soil W.sh
: (89,900 cy . 124~0 tons)
: Llboratory .v.lultion .nd
: prOCISS d.v.lop..nt
I'
I
I
I
.
I'
I
I' - ~-.
I
'1'0,000
'IS~,OOO
: - L.bor.tory ICII.
: - Pilot Icl1.
1 Lu.p' IU.
I LU811 SU8'
,.
I
: 0 ..chlnic.l Ihr.dding, l' ton/hr
(to .void .quip..nt ~...9' .nd
: incr..s. c:ontact b.t...n solv.nt'
: .nd c:ont..in.nts)
.",
,
: ~u.p Su. t
121,4~0 tanl :
--
...,~~
l'It~~nl
, 'l',.$2tlj, 000
. I .
'. -~
~ ,'" .
I
'..
- -
: Soil .Ish piOC:'IS, 89,900 c:y
,
.
.': - - 89~ 90~- c: .~'.:
.. ~ .. .-.- - ~ -:;.
I
: 0 lnclud.s tr..ta.ntlrlcyCl, of
..sh solution .nd dispos.l of
conC:lntrlt,'r.gln.r.nt solution.
Approxia.t.ly 100 c:y/d.y::-,--:..:-::.,,- "'~;:.~ :':'.';?1i>:"~:-:4.:;"'; --,." ---~-- : '"
"-.,..~ J(-~J ~'_f..,:)~-rr .1':'~~ :"rc? 1...r:: ~.... ..'~ - -~ ~£:~ -;: ::.~-~:: ~
: Dis"oll1 O.f tr..',t.d ..'f.,.i.-l" ., "r.~'-:.~ ~,,:. . ".__L ,
,. (~ f'" n.r1 ... Go" l' - ~ ~ p .... ~ ~"""';-'..;..: ..-
- - ~.' d' ='~, ~ ; ::.: : t;~: ~:. -~'~~~"~~~\3~~' ~:~.v; ~ '.;"-: ":.: ':.~~ (r;r. '.
: 0 teltin9 O~ .~sh.d ..~.rl.riOn. r 200 : 1,000 I..: '200,000
I..pl. p.r :500 c:.y. 1..,1. ~"d.( ,: - ~"'~'r,.-.~L9~~ .~ ?-',r - .1 .,- .'.>~',..'
Inl1 YI. fat' YOA/8NA/,j.t.:t,.~:df~~'cf; ~ril- H'.. -..-"'. i" -, .. --. '-
: a.:::::: ):J~~ti~/'~i3~A~o~~; ::,", ,[ :~.- :~~ :>~: :~. )~:'c~- ,
: 0 reburiil of .il''1~~I;~,iJ~:r&;~:i',+,-i!~I...=,:.' SO,900.=~!y.. ,2. .;»-.:5.(C::~Y""L'::-:;;JCJ.: ':;- S404t.-~OO
104 vo1u.. r.duc:.t:iQft~t:;-.~-- "-'..~'~,"} .~:.'-;. '. '~.....:L ..:o~ ~~; ,='<;l;$O:.J . .
: 0 r.burial of C:lp ~~:,-;'~-r:r: ,r -:-' ',-!O.~f~.,.y~a:;JJ~=~:::~~lC'~l' .;:>:#.:.1: 2~': ." .~3:Q.t:2'0
: 0 c:1.ln ..k.up fill~ -:<-"0-::' 1'~'~~!~r~'~'~.;: L=,-~ 12{~J:!.y~"c ::cL;=,:"S.104,lOtJ
I . I
- -; :.; , .. : ': ~ ;'" ~: -.. ~ ~ £, :;. ~~ - Q -;(: - J f:' -
I . r - - f
. "'.- }. . . - ,- ~
"
I"~
I
I'
I
""""1.~ - ~ -..".,
9~1 c:... y ...:
-
~ I - -
t -; ~ ~
I
I~ -
U,'40,:500
t'
I
.
. -:,...so.
-0
: Cap/cont.lns.nt .lonL Lo.bard
: Str..t fill flCI
: 0 concrltl or iSph.1t Cip
.' ,
. ~ I ,
.~. ........ -. - I
"9,000 .s.y,..' ~
~ ~ ~..-" i' .;...
,: 2 01 i;~ t:, ~,
1
. .:{
.
."
" .
Ii 60 ,.:)00
I'
I -:. ~
I
. -.;.t
: Srading/V'9.t.tlon
b ae:.
a,100/ac.
S~2,200
-------
.~
-.
~L1~~N~1!¥E 4 - PRELI~INARY ESTI~ATE, CAPITAL COST -- EXCAVATION/EXTRACTiON
E~' : DESCRIPTION : QUANTITY: UNIT COST,' : TOTAL COST, .
[[[
I ,
, I
9 : "onltor ..111
s
~,OOO II.
'25,000
lO : Enqln..rinq/ov.rsit. plrso"n.l
: t~rou;n i.pl,.,nt.tion in ph'l. (2
: p.rsons, 3 y,ars ..ch)
12,000 hr
I
I'
I
I
I
I
4~/hr
"40,000
11 : Subtot.l
. I
I
S 1 4 , 3 2 0 , 4'~ 0
12 : "Obili:ltion/O.8oDilization (22X)
: Conltructlon .'n~9...nt, lit.
: s,rvlC'S
..
I
',.
I
S3,I'O,~0f)
- ,
,
13 : T"hnolo;y I.pl,.,nt,tion,
: d.li9n" pl,nl, sp.cifi~.tionl,
: r'gul.tory approv.l, inlurlnCI .
: bondi, p.r.its <221t
S3;150,~OO
,
'. 1'-
,.
,
. .
~:
.~.-
: . - ,,' - ~ 1 , 43:2 '. 4 , /)
"-.. - ..
,.'
.,
I
14 : Ov.rhl.d .nd Profit - ---- .-.-.-.,;..;. -....- ~.,*".~:~--.....-.... -.... -_.-.0 --..;....: - - - ...~
~._-..~- ........,;........
~;c. .:: 1!~ti>.: 1i~!>.4~.
-------
t1
~TF.~NATlve 4 - PReLI~INARV ESTI~ATE OF OPERATING ANQ ~AINTENANCE COSTS -- EXCAVATION/EXT~~C~
I
1 .
TE" 1
DESCRIPrION
: QUANT ITV
I UNIT COST, .
I TorAl COST, .
[[[
1 I Sleu,.ity inlpletion, qu.,.tl,.ly, S h,.1 32h,. 3~/h,. S1 , 120
I
I
1
2 I "onita,.in9 - :5 ",.111 .nnud 1 y
I
.. I
I - I
I a l.bo,.: u8p1in9, 30 hou,.1 pI,. eye1: 30 h,. 3~/h,. S1 ,0:50
I
I 0 And yti cd: IJQA/8NA/..tdl 7 'SO/la '0,050
I
:5 .1111 pl,,' tl uk/dupl i cat I 1
I'
1
I'"
I 0 hplnsl', annual I I.".p s". 1 :500 '500
I I I
I .
1 I
1
1
3 ' ",intln,nel I
I ~ ~
I
I - ~ >.
I 0 FlnCI ,.Ipii,. 2'0 It Iy,.' 1 '~ft. I ' U ,SOO
I 1 1 -
I a Vl9lt.tian c:antrol 29,000 I.,y. 0.24/sy - Sli ,.970
I
.~ 1
\ '1 ,"
4 : .R.pa,.ting/Daeu.lntatiaft
, a Labar: quart.rly inlp'letion 8 hr. 3,/h,.. s'
I
2 ",./eyell I
}
1 I I
.., - ~ ~.=-... - - -.... ... - -... . ..1- - " . . -. '.> . ."
I a 1..110" - .nnud q,.ound .,tl" 24 h,.. 3~/hr. 1840-
I
fttonitaring 24 hr(c:yell. I -'
J >.:~;, ~..J.:1'"
I
.
:5 .: ANNUAl. TOTAL (raund.d) S19,Y10
b I Pru.nt .0." t". 1 S ~ 3 , e ': "
I I
-------
-16-
. <1
~
j
t~e treatment to be achieved by in-situ vitrification consi$ts of
imnobilization of metals within a crystalline matrix, and volatilization,
followed by combustion/oxidation, of organics. The actual perfor~ce of
the process in capture/destruction of organics must be demonstrated prior
to implementation.
Implementation of this alternative involves the following steps:
*
Removal of clean portion of existing cap, saved for replacement.
*
In-situ vitrification of contaminated fill area, extending into
subsoi 1 layer.
*
Replacement of 'clean cap materials, plus makeup fill and cover
soil as required.
*
Grading/vegetation.
Implementability
, - '
Literature reports indicate that vitrification of contaminated soils:;::
results in the formation of a stable glasslike and c~y.talline ~ss which~
is qui te rest stant to leaching, and weathering COma" et- aI",. lQS3). It ~'
should therefore, in such applications.- res~lt in an tjtssent1.all1. 'permanen~~~>;
remedial technology, as long' as' no future use of the property would req~lre'
excavation. . -- ._. , .
--
. ~....' ""'.-~. '-."
Testing has der.1onstrat'e<;t': that- th~, I~~i' process:. is,- eifeC:ti~e a~ depths
up to 10-13 meters (33- to' ~_3- feet-) (6~ e,t,~~!. 1983),.which.-t.~ adeguate for
the wastes at' the Kane and Lombard' site. -A' major 'Jncertainty .in~ the
application of ISV or any in-situ process t~-material like' that at the
Kane and Lombard si te involve~ - th~ h~;e!og~!Je~,ty ~Qf2:..'t.he m.a~erial~~and the
capabi 11 ty' of- the tec~not~~¥ to' ~eal W1'~Q.~'''i9ta=~p'ac:~1'' an~;a!~~Q,!;inui ties.
Li t~rature rept)rts indicat~- that""'ln-s!tiJ-v'i't:ti Hcatia" - is not: stgnifi.:a~t 1/
aff~cted by metal i"clusions unless a full elect ric31 short '-d r~uI t occurs,
and tOtetal fractions as h1~h as. 5% of J;he~;Qta~ ~~i~ht,:naY'-~; ac,a.Qmr.todatt.!d.
..-~... ..... ~.. ..." ~ ".ol":;:"" ">:;'~P"':" '. - _A't ,. '..-7.., _..0- -...-..-.-.-.-.
r.~~e~t;tnd.. cortc:e,~~~~~~Fu~'!OtU::~f.g~ t~r~~t~a"!h~ ~nssgJ~~~:1 whe.;;:t~Jit.
'11. t n ficatl 0.':':0.',... ~~i'~:~Yn.t>ai ~tnf'~of" t'~{:~~.111ot:j~~~:t/~b~~;{n ~Ch~=~s~,~?-~ . t~~ :;i tl ;1\ay
azfect rsv o,er3tions. -E~er6y requlrements and cost W1ll lncrease due to
the necessi t f for evaporating t~is :uoi.~~ur~~~ .If ~. I:!le,ct;~ical sno.rt ~
circuit is;..chieved the p~6C~S~ _'!i-l~ be ,~c.:onip'roJ!ii.sed.. ,=:-;-'-~'---=- _:'-7
.- - . ~- '-':" -:-~ - ~.-"';;-~ - -~- '-. ----..- ...-- .-
. - - . . -, ;;0-- ~ " '" - .- ' -.: - -: -:
1'~~ ~ql1i ;J'T\e!H Ef)r - r3~: has .'1:>pare~t ry -:Il.n.ct(~;-\:e.g .~~.rL J,~.Ir£r\:{"t_e,,:: irq.
However, operations i:)rt the scal= ri.~ces.<;ary '.1:t -fl,e -;';::';n= ;:md' LOMbard .;i to:
have apparentl)' ;,\ot :)een demonstt':ued.
-:.
-------
~er3tional ~autions dhich should ~ considered in the irnol~ntation
of ISV- rray inclooe potential for accidental gas release due to. hood
failure, and precautions associated with high tenperature and high voltage
equi~t.
Current infoz:mation on the processing rate for vitrification indicates
that complete vitrification of the Kane and taDbard site, assuuing 24
hours/day of operation, would take 4.5 i'9ars.
While research and pilot testing of this process indicates promise for
. application in heterogeneous materials it has not been demonstrated for
highly heterogeneous landfill materials such as are present at ~'e ~ne and
Lanbard site. Substantial developuent work will be required prior to this
selection of this option.
Effectiveness
* This alternative is likely to achieve or, exceed cleanup levels for
organics in ,soil, and will substantially reduce contribution of all
contaminants (organics and metals) to ground water;, as with other
09tions, the degree of ground water remediation to be achieved is
difficult to quantify.. The irmobilization ~f metals. in tl,. crystalline
matrix, will reda:e- inc:identa.l exposure' to- these. contaminants, bUt
any future use such as cons'tr,~ion whlch.requfr~. excavation~ ofi
the material may result- in some ha.zard:-'- . ~, nativ!l, of. the solidified
mass 08Y itSelf" obvia~ ~? ~ture ~.,-: . ~ ... ,~'~' ,..'
. - -
* Government and local opposition to this alternative as a long tap!
solution would likely_be limit~. to. co,~rn- o.ve~, long-te;m.,-
prohibi tion' of fUture . land- uis~~, as 'Alith: Certain oth~- options-.
Gong-term impact ~n t~~s; of tJ1ain~,~nC:e. ~n~<;gri~g;or, ~rye~.llance
should be' relatively., lo~. ~: - . - ' ',: -:.~ ~-~ ' '. '. ~r. ::' ; ': - . - . -
- - -.::t ~:;, 4~.c :~- - ~ - ..... - -: ~. - ~.... -
. -- 4~' ~ '"~-::- }~~ ,;, .e-:'"'I ..-- ~ ...,'" ~f)~.;- - :';....2 ~.:.:. ::-,~-,. "'--' ~..:
* Short term f.~cts on :t:1ie sUrrounc:Unc;' oor.muni.ty. 'AlQuld. be\; ~~ose' .
reL!ted'~ to 'Cons~rUc;'i~8:j~~~~lJ~~es_~!t- ~;~f~~~r (no,i~e:,-.. odQ~',~ ' ..
traffic) .". "---.' .* _."~-: ~: -':.- 7"",~;:t,"~.~ '.,c..j -'"-
'. . .-4... ::':.:'" ,~...,.. ;",~1J~ P ~;::... .....! -".:....".-......-- - _0.... ~
" ~.- ..t_.. ''', '. '." -.~"''' "!" {-'~;J~.r:: .:~ ...-,F,- ~ ,!~..t,~" Z'~ ~r:(. ~ ~~: ': - ~ . . ~;:- ...
* . '1atar~~1:3 'ri!~.~y~~o; Off~~~99.J;ted.of~05r~~-,~r;::~~is~ a:~~rr:ta~i'le
wou~~~'.~' l~i~:~ ~ ~~;~D5~! .~~~~ 4,~1!<;'~~')9ut, ~'1! - ~!~1;~r}g; . '.
'dral~e~d1fCfi'", :~e::'materrafs woulCS~ _unles~ sapl1"9rCOuld estaollsh
o~if~~,~.i~~/:~.".iia.. ~,4i ~~;~q9~~~n~~~~re~2re~~~~~J~~ "to.. .
f~riI:;;}Jridi~~~:<'.AJ1"~~egw.at;~ons:' ::.=~ -'.. '", .'- .:,
~~~;~i2f45;;~~;-~"-~ ~.~~~:~,~,:j~~"~~ , -, '-'. - - -- ~t ~ ~.;~. - - . ~..'~
* ~~~~1:J;~~~~i~,~1,.~ouid a9~ar to ?ro~ide ad~ate iong-te~' ~ro-
'teCt~~;~f,~~t'J(:, 1eal t:~ ~nq. ~1~ ~'lirqQr.l~t, ,,:so ~ lO.~g _as.: t.1=-
sOl'ialffEid,;1w'ii<7ts !sft intact 0 ar.d" in "9taee. ,~ . _:. . .
~ -.:.'" .'::' .-S :-:-'.::: ~-;;.._:-.:;;- ..:~~~.~~ ,.~~..........,~..t=l'" .- ..~
.. -I ~i ~1 - ~ - ~ r "":": .~ > - ~ ..::. -; - . ...":'~ ": ...: ~ ::: - . ~ '::
* As long as -a'fr' ~,iss,i~f'!~~~r~j~the ,pf;~.~~,-:1o_~ ~~~s,,!ff~;i\'ely
~n1 consistent!? co"tralr~;~1e'~&j~ee ~= 3hort-te~
(i~?1e.':'~r1t3ti:)n ?hase) ~zard ~o 9l;oUc; :iealt:",2cd. ,::'1=,~"'Jito~e~t
- ,.: . -". ,....., ." : -' - ::.- - - ... - -' - -
S.10~h(1 not :-:e ~xces~ I'l~., ~.- - ~ . -~; ;... -:' : ~- - ""',' -
,,~ '.-
-------
-18-
>;3
-'
:ost
Cost evaluation for implementation of ti1is alternative is contained in
Tables 6-1 and 6-2. Cost for the actual vitrification process have been
developed fran vendor contact, and should be considered speculative in the
absence of testing and detailed treatability analysis.
Reccrc'Mended Al ternati ve
Section 121 of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization A.ct (S~)
of 1986 and ~~e current version of the National Contingency Plan (NCP) (5~
Fed Reg. 47912, NOv~r 20, 1985) establishes a 'lariety of requirements
relating to the level of cleanup for remedial actions under CERLCA.
Applying the current~luation criteria (irnplementability, effactiveness,
and cost that was previously described under each of the five
~lternatives), we rec-"'IIU1!nd ~~t Alternative 2 be implemented at t:.,e Bane
and Lanbard Superfund Si te.
This re!:ledy is a source control action for !:he si te. r~ound water i.,
the area will ~ deferred in this Record of Decision until further
investigations on other potential, si,tes in the nearby area are concluded.
This remedy does not at:tempt: to ensure caapliance with all ARARs for the
entire 3i te, but: will be consi!ttant", to the extent: practicable" wtt:n' those
action specific~. CEr..A ~,l2l provides that under certain "
circumstances an 'otherwise app:Ucable-or> relevant and,'appropriate
requirement can be waived. These waivers! apply only to the attainment' of
t."1e MAR, other statutory. requirements, such as t:.~at remedies be protective
of human healt.' and-:!the enviro~~, cannot be waived. CERCrA ~ 12>1 (d)'(4).
provides waivers which~re considered in: recommencing this alternative.
The following,waiver;s are a9p-li:caRl:e.~to this site: -1}21nterilu rernedy;~ 2)
greater risk to health or, the envirorxnent:, 3} technic~l icpracabilit:y a[1u'
4) fund balancing.
i.....
."' ~. ~
Alternati~'e'~ is a source control, r~y and can be 'lie'...ed 3S ,1n i:'lter:.,~
reroedy becaUSe ,~~t.\t1d water ,i.C1i ~ tsgc:ond! and ~,~,,:o;'1j.~ "~te~ '~'U~..;:>a;- .
;ddr~ss~ ,~t t:,e ~nclusi,!)" of to,e ino,oestj.:J.3tio!'1 (1: ct;,er ~2Q~aq~;,t;~L .~~:;.r~~-3z.- ~ .
."-,.' .t '
Al te~~,~;'(~~~J"~;1.~=5 possibl y prov~ide pecanent solutions to t:"le;;: ~ . - -;
. site: ho~((;f.'~81"~;t~~~;~.ociated with the implementation of t.1ese
alt~r1'1ati'ie$~;;:!?-r9~!~:,:~~!':?i~'eater ri5:( to t..:'e heal~h .:m~ ~ ~'9 ~~~r"on:!1e.nt ':ia
,~ir e'!lissiQ~~;'~q~~~~\i~~l~ent:.3tion of ~ternatfY~.: 2~ Jf'i\~<1~~', '
~.t7~~~~~.~.:;,~~~~J~~:~:~:tf~f1~." , ~ -: -
jUs to>. &iE!~ij~rrtto~ja.-:roUI't of :-:onstr:JCtion ''1ateri.~l and =eoris ~l.1rYed
on-si t~, to':3f';'fi;cca~/a:tton:r:~ir~ under \1 t~_rnati'l':~<1a~~ ~,~t"4!;':~, !~o.uLj. b,e- ,;" , ,~
t~hnicalll L~racticable ~nd costly. ~lcernati¥eef~~~~~;~~S~ .o.~~a~ving . ,-
selected hot S?ots itientified in t:.,e geo9hysic3l:i$~E~~~~ :~~pl:~q:J <;-
analyses, 'lersus t.1S P.ntir~~i':e .~nd is less cost!:!. .~~.'-
. ,...... - . . ... .
-:'aole :3 li 3tS 3tat'.ltcry r~';...ii c-:.:ia"ts.'In1
;1 t~r:'1at:i.,~ 2.
;.~-;;,{s
"\??~ ~C3j::; - ':_:).
...A.... . .:;,."-J.,
- ... - -
-------
.Q
ALTERNATIvE ~ - PRELI~INARY ESTI"ATE, CAPITAL COST -- IN SITU YITRIFICATIO~
t r t
t t .
:TEM : DESCRIPTION : QUANTITV : UNIT caST,' : TOTAL COST, ,
[[[~..........&.
1 : Sit. p~.p.~.tion
: R.~oy. el..ft'oYI~burdln (e.p)
:
, - . - "I"' """N-r.J;<:- <..
-:-' " :. - ! .... --6 ,."i'v:""'C'. y~.,,-
,;.. .
,... '-
20'~fel~yi" . ;.-1 - -'
-S409,2~O
.-
-.
.:=~--::.~-::.: ~'S ;;----
I!'~~ .....-:: :..: =:~ '. ..:::
;: .
-. ,
- - ~
. ~~ ~ :.:;-- ~. - ~ . : :.. ~ - ..
i : ~a"itar w8lls S ,,~OO/.i.: ,
---. -.;::'"r .:~~-": :-:f, :... ;:.~~.t~~ -'-C'"!,~ ~:;~-'::;~ ~ ~l ~ .~\ -= ::-'1G:f .1~-
a : En I) i n 1'~i:",/aY.r.ti. t.I'" i~onft".1f;: :;r1.e, :t:':C:'.~03, 0:0'01 ",.i., ~-:?3i 'x-4SJJ1fi".~:'" i::::', f - - ~ £'.: 1900 , 001)
: th~ouqh. i dip rl'.ln tiUio"~ pft'ii8'"j', ~(}r~u:;: .:~.: \--~;'B-:10I'-z':rI. 1:-'€t;~2~;' -:S<"'~Fr.s <
.. ' ...-..."....,) ~-1".:-...- :;",. -..,...... "'r-,.-'g,~"+"""'I e.r'" ~.... ~~~,r~"."-"""---- ~,:.."""'" ""0 --1',- -~"'<#".>#""',4.
plrsan.t,,- .. Ylars. Ii'.. ,-:;'--' - "'---".'I.J... ". . - .~ ,'.,. ""--'. ,.'. -. ,'..-.
" . I. I ' I
9 : Subtat.r'.f:i.' "-:"~~~!;~:.i-"4'.7'~-,'r:~~:r~3C ~t.;-,vc-:q \(-=:::~aacq : Fr.s =,.i: ~~:'-":;::;;=-f~~ 127 S92 000
:',~~~r:~~;~i~~~.~~~~f:~~~!;::~' s>rf: "!~ j~; ~=Gi~p :~ t'J ~.{-.:t ~'E'v'T--,'~~- ''::',~ ' -
10 : ~obi l.i zltianln:i...ti;ttZ::.~fi'Qft,'.o(~22t'r''''':.:' =: : ~~_. :£,j::;:'~::: - "'::: - ~ ~~' : :""16' 070' 240
: ~:~: ~~~: ti,~n_~~_~~~'1: £ ~ - -~ ~": o~ :~:. :~: ::~~.I ,~:r~ -~:"~,~:~: T .~. .,' ,
11 I T.chnalaC)y hfi'l..;,;'t;tia'n~~;':'s.--.:.::.;--: 15:::"11. :-S'1i:,~'Sc:: :,h':'':J-£',-e':Jl':-- .'.:--: .:e:.-,,- 070 240
... . , - ' . . . . -- - ., , , ,
rhsignt, -plut, IP.~iHC:itio"'i~.'£~~s:;:-f' .-{..:~~C':) :::~'.f.7-~":'5::-:_~<:2>~;:-- "-r:""'-'c:..
: !'19ul itOr-y i~p~oYll ~::rn,u,i~el:.=' ~'~:Je::':~~ =~: 2: -~~ ~f:=~r -,,~=:~-.~ r-- - -
: bonds, per-.lts (22%) , - ~'--' c,,,,:. ~~ ...;.. -:::.-.-; ~.-:-,. :" ::'<_J_~'_:::- :-::;:- -...
J:~,OOO
12 : Oyerhead I"~ ~rQfit~i10ii7 .
... ~ . - ~
-
,-'
.
Y. -.::: ... . ~ - ....::,"'"
-. --- . .. -- ... -
:.: ;~'::"E:;-~ ~~ i .
- . I
. .,
.
S2,7~9,ZI)O
r
13 : Contlnqenc:y (2~1)
. ,
Sb,Sge,
"
.
-~
15 : T~TAL (round.d)
U~,3a9,100
-------
~
.RNATIVE S - PAELI"IMARY ESTI"ATE OF OPERATIN& AND "AINTENANCE COSTS -- IN SITU VITRIFIC
'rE":
DESCRIPTION
I QUANT ITY
I UNIT COST, .
,
I TOTAL COST, .
--.-[[[
. I
, ,
: S.~urity in'~.ction, qu.rterly, 8 hrl
32 hr.
3'/hr.
U , 120
2 :
~onltorlnq - S ..115 .nnu.lly
: 0 ~.borl ,..pling, 30 ~~url per ~y~ll
I
30 hr.
t
3'/hr. 11 ,050
950/.. $0,050
SOO S~I)O
: 0
Anilyticilt YOA/aNA/..t.l,
~ .111, plus bllnk/dupli'.te
, .
,
7
: 0 E~pln'.', .nnuII
.: Lu.p: sua
".
I.
I
I'
;;
I
l-
I
I
::.. .- ~~-
~
I
.." I
I
3 : "Iintenuce
-
...... "
1'-
: 0 FlnCI rlplir .'
: . oVlgltltion control
- ,- -..
I
-- ~
. 25:0 f. t./:y~'
2~';~OOO' t:; y..
ilf~f
.~. -:::.. ..:. 0"'0 2:41,:"
, .
.
.,.
'1.
.1
.- I
'U, ~oo
. a , 910 .'
--
. -.":.,
...,
: Ihpor t tngl Dacu.ent.Uan,
..'" ~.._-
I -
1-
. :_~.- =
.tf"'-"91,"'" -:~. .
"~ ..-_. "...~... ~-
.~-
- ~:-.1~
;,
:~:'i~:1iJ2 . ~~....=
.. -.':
I
: 0 Llbor: qUArterly inspection
2 t'I.r I c: yc 11
::--.::.:..
l .
f..
'.:..:. &~.h." .2=. - : :-;~..::.G .3 Sifh',.,.
I ..
I
S290
.'
- --- --',' -.- .;..~ ~~- -; --~ ~.'~ -:.- :::::": -
- -..:"- - G.~ < - .-. ..J~" .
: 0 I.lba,. - In~ud 9.rauft~_...~;~,e~ : .,-.;. t-:~!".r:-: 2.jf" ",.=.?;;~:: .:..:.:y-r:' 3!1.h~".
",on 1 tQr i nq., .24. h~/:~"':'t~l ~-::-:... - -; ::.~ . I~::' .,<~.. :. . .., ;:~~c::,s"c.,: ? z...;
t. .
.
1840
- "'"-~ I -""'""'C't £'--:~I';--~C#";":;'~ ~--!-. "'- ,
~-'~ i; .; ~j~"'; . .:gf;.-~ ,ti -- --- ~
5 : .aNNUAl. r.~Ul.., (r:o:y-,'d:ed).~,o£;':'':<',-;:-:: (~ ;j~.\.;~~;0 .~~~". =:.r"':tr:?:ro.; ;;'~~A1.:':':;~':";- ~. .
. ~ .1t~ :I~':,;('n' ;'zC-;" ;::: .i:~l~::f'-:]~ .:-,,''':~-:;£\'o~::'.4$ :~, -'!~-~~.:.~.:.':'~S"~f:'-"~-
o : i' ~ !.~"" t ..or ~t'I.. - ,. "'- "'. '91. "'':)l<.. .-- ;":.a=....r.: ~ . .':6.:-;- ""~ -;::'!,; '.'-: .1i;.1
-------
-~~-
Thi~ alternativ~ ~onsists of the EolloNing:
'*
~val of dr\.J!ts and hot spots contaminated soil on the site.
Site cleaninq and removal of vegetation to the extent necessary fut
construction of the necessary caDPJr"ents.
'* Construction of subsurface contairment/di version structures to both
ptevent the uncontrolled latetal migration of presently contaminated
shallow ground water fro.'!\ the site, and prevent the latetal recharge
flow of uncontaminated ground watar into the waste area.
'*
'* Construction of a multilayer soil cap over the area to prevent ~'e
infiltration of precipitation and surface water into ~e ~ste area.
'* Construction of a drainage system.
'* Clearing of drainage tiitch along the' east side of the site.
Devel~t of neoessay surface water runoff management facilities~
* Continued ground water mnitorinq of the site.
'*
The conceptual developnent of this alternative is presented in E'iguie
4. This configuration has. been developed to provide, to the extent:: :,.. ';;0
possible, c:anplete on-site management of surface water.' .'-,,--"-' .,~
Along the eastern- boundary oft.1ote- fill, ground watatcdntainment is
provided by the subsurface slurry wall. Along the nort.1ot boundary (Lombard
5treet) a sirnila~ subsurfac~. bartier is used. ;;;. - :'!:: i . , ~ .. -,," -;J
. ;
In t.,is region, hO~'ler, t.,e wall must be construCted through Eill
materials, whiqh: COr:tplicates~ the~construc:tion p~cfc!essqH:Soil~,:~f~ol'les' ~:: -,
uncertainites r~ardinq wall continui~l, and raises C'O'nbirhs'over' it.3 lc.,g-
t:eO\ physical and chemical intergrity.. Ho~ver, t:her~ are .'t '/ari,~.t;:l of , '
cC"'ltolications and unknowns ',.mid\ should ~ considered. ~£rL!lfege't'irn:luce t~:e'
. incr~ased a~ount f1E ~xca"ation r~ired 1:0 war\{ .3rourid ouri~j. I1bj~=':~, '::--:.~.
olnimo'.vn ~cditional slurt"1 which :nay' be ':1eeded to achieve an effec"Cfve' -seif.
in, the. porous;".fUl.,.. ~,t:.'1e-requir:ement-for-disposa'l'-of'~t8S"excav~it8d: - .'-
from the ~;:'~'%:t,.~.f~.\,r:t.Pla<:8"ll!nt wi1t;~ :immrted. :Ei"t't '(:asLoppoSed" to~ t:h~'" -
, ,': %/::.'- ',;S," .-'.- ": -. ~'-'~-q.. -,; .'-""-,. "- .: ,"-- .. .
~ore co:mlOnSFeU~JEt;~f::~~ e: its '1atural El.:J'N.
~ ..
-------
-2G-
following construction of the subsurface contai~~nt/diversion system,
the site will be capped to prevent infiltration of precipitation. <.:ap
construction will include the construction of drainage channels and
appropriate grading to direct runoff to the east for discharge in the
existing drainage ditch along the eastern boundary.
'!'he first water bearing zone contained wi thin the site will be
dewatered by the placement of a shallow sump in the northeast area of the
confined zone, to intercept this water as it flows naturally to the
northeast. ~ new cap system and subsurface barrier/wall wi 11 minimize
entry into the site and the shallow sump will 'Nithdraw existing 'Hater from
the shallow zone. Current evidence indicates that this zone will drain,
- over a period of years at a declining rate. Since this water is
contaminated it will nOt be di$:harged directly to the surface or storm
sewers. The preferential disposition for this relatively small flow wr.~id
be discharge to the sanitary S8W!r system and hence to thE! municipal waste
'ollater treatment plant, under an; agreement wi th the ci ty. This proposal has
~n discus~ with. t."1e- state and ~ ~ity. .
Ccmcarison of Remedial Alternative-
-
Table 7 provides~a canparison of the five remedial .alternatives
described. in the ROC. -. . -
-.
Schedule
~ .... .. .
~'C7'.,..~-.:. ~ ; ~ ,:,
.r-> -
. "!. ~: :~-7 -'! 3~
c _0'" 4
~';I . -:.'? -1 0 <1:
- ~ ~J - .:to
~ - w .~ .;~ ~.;';~
""
-c:> - .-.
..:~....-:
ofe"::"~ -
. ~.., ." ~ J .
: ~ i;;; : ~ ~ten1bei l~g~
,r?7:J i:;:. Z ~ ; .~ ~ :. OJ;' .'~ -:- .... :.-;
;- -;;-n~-=-.~ .;~.;~--.;
" '" - OCtocer 1:98-7>-
c
Concurrence of ~t>-
Negotiations, ,,ii t.'1 PRPs .
- ., - -- .-.- --- -.--.- - :--,~~ -- -- ;' -.....-.
Initiate Design Phase ~~
...;. ~~ -;:), .,
.~ .t;: ~<:.A""'" -'- ~.
--~Q:I._- ..
.... 1 t ~. 0- .o'rl"~ ..-.a
-~p e. e :~_~l;~ 5 ~~q.- 17<'" ~
-;;0':- ;~~=~~-~~ i~~r
. . ~ l) ~ Lr U ~ -.",. .....
~. '... e. - .::;; ..I -:r: 0 <:, .
ci- ...
~.. (.,,-C;
~-~ ~~
. <
... ~
~ ~ -~
-.r
~-
. .
" .,...~
- ...
... Q
~ ~
~ - -- - - - - _.- - - - # - -- - - - -. -~ - - - ~ --:. .
- ; 1) ...
-:>.:.. ,...
.. --
. .... - .. - .
~
<:;J i> ~
... - "
. ~ -""
-.. -' -..p -
i,
.
.~-
... J..~- .
. ...
-
. .
-. ..-_iJ-
?
..).. .
cecember 1987~
.- - - - - - - - - - -
JanuaI"j 19,88:-;
-
. -
.1une lJ~8,.~~~:
-- .*..::0:-,
- 4. 'CLt; C:
.0 =- -~-(I
f '~}.n"
~.tJ~t.1St ~1'-I:Ji.:~ ~
::/:;"",<.1
(j ::.,. "-'~
c..,a_~-(t
lJ =-4:1 c:: _.
-- ......
- ~,.-.:.
~ -.-"" 0-
.. -..
c r" D --
;: 40 _f> "-:!....~
... .. -.c ..
-07"';-0.
.... -.II p --
~~O~,,~
-' lOa .« -
,;
-.
- - - -.-
. ,
,
..
<>
-
- .
. .
"'.
~ .
. .
..~
- .
. .
'- ~
. -
- -.
....
.. ~~ -
.;; ~" - ~
~'\" - ".;!--f"-
': .... ~
:--.t:... ~
-~4- A ~
- ,
-~-
-------
IAIU "
.
a: cin t .. n.ut'
[[[
Al (UIIAIIII( : 'IIUUI I UCHlIlUl CD8ISIIUAIIOIIS I 1lilillUIIOILAl I 'UILIC NUlIN' I CO..(III I
I IIOI'N I I COll8 aUAII8II. I (IIVIIOIIfllIlIAL 1"UEIi I I
I con. I I I I I .
I. (HousallDIlI I I I I
;---------------j-----------j-:---'--------------------------j-------------------------------j-------------------------------j--------------------j-
:ND A'taDII I ",on I ',echaua", a." , a....h"o. tI I Unll." lARA 'u...U... I ... .e,...ec..' ,duc8l..'a .1 I..f ..t telle.". I
I I,'.",,,,,,,,,,,,,,, . cod,.h .11 cll ,. ... ..., I .u... ...... '1".. uu,t . .f' eu". I
I e;\.:~: ".,' " "': I ."ltcallh ,..ul,...... .., I '.r .ccurrl., "a, ..'urea I c ..a-u, crU.,h. I
II ',£..'~..a...~uo,..,' I h ,cu,""h II .. 1."'1. a.t "u"'... ... . h I I
1,1: ".!E:u"e,,~.'~i'~!t,.. tI "4""'" I ......,.. I ",.c"II., I I
I ",e, \!:r' ,,',"..' :,~, ""'.;' I, I I
I -:~I':, ' ':.:," 'i "', I e I I
I '1',:I.t~"r.".... .. ....t.,.., I ".ue,.. "cll.eul. a I.Ch..n...... ..u.. ..t I I
I .'1 i..'" ..U,:;;',,,, .uau".. ., . "."'h.,..h., ... .co...ec I II .ar ,.i.... .. .e....aunt I I
I 1'~,'C""A'.">'''.;tr.....' ...., I c....t.... to ".t'lCh4I. I a..., . ,rou.. ..te, ., .a, I ~
I ): cCji!4,UO"I"l8',,,,"ut'd '" I Ulou," ,...th.ar I .."e,.......a e.,.ct.,' I
d,:,.t..U.,\.~. !tU.;"'h~, I I CD...."t..ul ..11 t."., I I I
'Hcol!t.;,j."'I!.~';~~~.'. ~J' I ".g, .... I I I
tl~~~;tI:;:~l':','lf'I',;':!,: :,..,:,.;.I',~ (~I It' i I I I
;.,n\,":.:~..." :\(11;'{" !'. ~~ . ,..lIIlc."....... .., h I I I
'.' ! ", ,'" ,.' : \ tt.> I ,.IIC.U."'.' .I.c. .. I I I
I iI. t: . ,.11..,8I.n I. ""'''.1 I I I
. ~ I' .....,.. .. ..81",... . I I 1
I ( . r:~ ,,. . ;."01 ~:...a .., II. h...... If I I.
. " , " I ,..,10.-..... .. ,,,. .. . I I I
I I ,.gl...1 ".,"'... I.
I I' I, I I
I 1.,I....'."../c'.,"uc'.IIla.t,1 'ot..t..a ,.,.et. ,.,.,..~. I '..ua. ,.,uc."I,.e.ec,.", I I..f ..t ..4,... I
. ., c.,t.l. ,.,.c', I.u'.u,'.c. I I .." c..'..I..' .. ., ".u.. . ..1 ca...-u, I
I CD..,.h' ",,,,,Ucft.. I" .. ...c..."... co......,... I ..h, .lIte,1I .,a.. 'ro. tII. I c,U.'I'. ' .
I .... co",",,'' . ..h, ,.. U,.. ...., I .... ... L...." .a.., ht I IUU a hi, I
I I ...,.., ..., lid., lI'all I ....c. .. ."..,...1 ".ud I co..,IIIY" ,. I
I 0 .....i,.. ..,t., "".c..I.'I,1 ., .u. ca,. '.'11 I ..a., IIU.t'., e. .e .,cua, t. I ,..uc,... e. I
. ..u,.....t.' . """""'''.'It''. I ,,..tet. I tutu,. ..,u. .. I
I. lI.hu", t. ...hll I I' I coAt..e...... .. I
. ."..CtUl. '''''III ,.,t.... ..1. I'.cll."... c.aa.ct.. I .,'uc'I.. e. 11..1'11 tll,..t I ".u.. ..t.,. I
I hnll" II ..,.,a h. I II.,. ., ,roll.' ...., 1 'n. . ,.ct c....et I I
I I ".au... AI .IC... O. I lea..""c".. II" .C,..,..I I .
'I c'r".' t'CII..a." I. I ao.ooo ", .., ,.,.e,. 1 .'1... ..a, .,.. al. ,.11 I .
. ,. ,tl".a, .'r.I", ..,..,. I ,.,.e, II.'" c... ., I .cc.,. .. .at. ... .""" .. I .
I I 11.,,11114 ",uhU... I I. .. uta. .It.,.dh.. I I
. I.,a......".. .IU "".h. I aO.50.oa. 1 I I
. ..".,.a ".'f .. ,.,I..lc I ,..I.tl".a, alttl. ,.'..ta.a I I
. .,'."...co ., c..h....... I. A"lIu.a. .'0,...", " .., .,.,,,,, ,....c II..UII., I I
. ,'.UII' ..te, ",...,. "'''.,' ....,...., ,.Uc, ' .."an...." I.,.et .u,.., I I
. ... III, ,.v.av. ... ...".1 .:' ,..u,.. co..a..,.u... 10,1....hU.. ".... I I
. ... ......c. If .t., ....., .", I ,I I < , ' I I
. ...co.".'"", ~.II'" ....,1\, .. .If-.I" ...,...a.. ' '.r ..el.,. a. I.., ..,. I I
I ....,....t II "'III'.'. F~ I c.oh.',,". ..h,e,.. 1 e. .,'U, .. c.... ...At I I
. ' I 'I! I ,.,.a,.. co.,'It~,. '.atll I".,..c,..r.. ." ,.,..U e. I I
I So.. ...u.t .. ...-.... ". liS ... ...".... H',' nc.....h..... ., .a.. I I
. 'iI,.,,1 .. .IC,,,.'U I, ,.,....u..,. "I .114/., trou.' .,h,.' I
I ..h,lth ,., .. ~~..u'J~.' / I , a ! I I
I I . I ' I I
. A"lauIIIIU, .. ~".c".""lCa;. . ..,.,.".. ., . ..-.u. I lII.ul. n.ult 8' .....".11, I Uhlr ,. .Iead I
I fa, 8.. '''''lIch.. of if, r. I.."..,;.t., ,.,u,a.. I ea.,..,- ,,,......, I ..U ca...-.., .
I ."...c. .. ','f'~.""'''' I~' I c..rah.co .UIi h..,.1 ..4 a i...".I,j..hllc,'.. ., I c,U.,h. Uha, I
I n,hl.1 ,.to. ha .., . I.. . .It ,..It, "..ht,I'.". 1 U.".hlAh. ..u..a., ..'I . to '''''''.'''11, I
I ...111... .... . " II,'" I ICi... .. ""'r'h.. 'I .11.0'" I "il,",.-.' ,.. . ... ,,'ucl., I ,,'uco I
I "............. .....h.. ...." I .., ."~.ui" t, .." ,. ":', 1',.liI,Ii'. t.....e..... to I ca....e........ .
: .. ...,.u.'. ' i!J r" I IIICI."tto",~''''I''., I "a.ita.''''''1 .".cl .. I ,'.u.. ...., .,.. I
I ' !" . I, " :,::,:",,,,~:, I '.ltl',.to' "..., ...., .u.a.." I ... .a. L..II.,' I
I Alh,... h. ,roc..... ..,,11 <, I I I,...,..a: ~"~'IICU", ... ,.1:8~., '. .""Cilit t. ,,...,,. I .u.. . .
I "..11,.... .."'81'., ',I :' I .~.t "f: I. ~c~.'...~,.:.a,'~ " I ". I .
. InhnU....., ".I;.J.It.~ ;,' ':~.ec """.,co C",r,I',~',(~~,-! I ' I I
. ...... '" .u......;.t ' . 115 US 260H... ..,,1,.. a '.".'''1 .., ..,"h. I I'
. ,.n,t..,., It. .. ,.t I ..,ilhta... .., If",...." 11:r'ch .,11.., ra.", I I
I "."."'11. ' I COInh.II.. II...,...,!\. I:.. ..10.. Ir.. '.c,..,.880.. I .
I . 6....a..c.. IC... .".""... I I I
. Con.truc..IIUIt, .. on'"'' I 10.5"0". ',', I ,.,e... 01 .,.. uu,,"". I .
. "lCh,.,..., II .....lI., 111;1' I. 1 ,.. .'0"'. .. .h,.. I
. ,."t",.lr 80. tllra..,I, ,u' I Off-.... . II .. ID.. I..."",,, .. ...,hco ,......,.. I
I "'leUr .,.... II, '118 . ....,....,. '.,.. c.o.lhnc. I ..."'.1.' .. '''.-01. 0' II' .
I 11~!'''I,~n .~~o~~~~II. ~~" I ~"h.~~,~n.~ "."lInll 101 I ,,'uhn. .. 1:0.".1.111"" .
IS,'"
I. .
84,941
.
.
.
, .
.
.
.
.
-------
, ,
i..:'
UIL~ '1
Ul' '. '
..............................~....~[[[~....................................
"UUIIA1IV( "'UUII 1 '. :W1C.'C~,~Cti"IUAHOIiS I ..I. ".'I,u'l0."" I 'UlliC IlEAUIt' tOI"llili
MOil" I !;:';":;;1..:';~i;"";;"r';, ' I I '011111"" I IIIVIIIO....I.Ul'IIiUU
: (05" . "I"~ 't'.;:),'.".'.", . i ,'. .."',1. ,:"01, t, ',' I
, IIII.OUSA..1811 ,)I.!:'t::;:f;;,>,it.:<:\ .: :'..' I
..-------------~--~-----------~-~-~~~~~~~~~~~-~----------------~--~---~-~--~~----~-~----------------------------------------------------------------
: : I t:'I'\ I ,c'i, ,';.';;:'~j"""'~'J Ii' I I
:ih.'..1 I 8,'~.~,t,'..,"".':,","'~I'.'''"' .11' I """",","',', ,,,.., .., I I, I
: I,..".n' I '''''..''1''';'''''''' .. I ,....It, 'I I;'..'.'U .. I I 1
Ilcon"lIu.dl I ''',','';t.." 'i.",..t_,',""I'" I ""...IUV......IH...., ,- I I I
: Ie..." ,..te.\ct..~4' . Iolt. I \' (J"\' .,. ~ '\ ,<, ,. ~ ' I I-I
I "(,:;",,1.J':.",',,Jl;;:;:.ut.'JIIClI>- I 811.u" ,..uU .. ,.,.....t ,I I I
I ...,"II"."f:"~".""'''At,IIj'h'''U I '1...,,,,,.-, .., u.h.I..h.. I I I
I .'Oit,' "h.hr.""'''''''''",.",. .1, '''''...)"..'.'' '.h"U, I I 1
I ...11 IU"'.."."..,. i I .' ~"...a..., .. ',.,''. hDtl.,. I I I
I , I,ll''' /-, I v.., 1; t \J~"'! '~\}' I ."t." .. ....-..1.. . . , 'I
I &'8(1 h' ,.,.a,.. t. ".,. .( I I '. I I I
I .u':. .11'.", """'fr.'laW,.". II ".. I I H". . 'J'" I I I
1"...4...1:..11., .,,8t'I7"0 t~1.'I1'''''<1 I.'. " II' ,Ill> I I I
I . I I'IJ"~ i . ~ I> ~'"
I , .." ",., , I I "f t " .. ," ~ q I I I
US,'" I ','Of';I.h" ",~.....t,.. ''',''''''''''''] ':'~.""""."'" ,.,..,.. I. ."... ,..uU a. r"."r" I U...I, h ...t., I
1 ..", .11'. ..,CIt :,.'.',118:' I .I'rou', "...., U,."au,. I ,...ch.. I. p.' , ... ,. I .lu.1 IOU I
1 'PfHu"'.,rJ'_.I;c.:")~ I ,~. U'-"''',hCI\'''' ,......, I "'reat ,.,.u,' "'''I c..hct I C....-U, "U.'" 1
I .. ,ac860.. n.hll...,. I .',HII...hc'.'ult;, ......... I ,..h. .'he .. ,..."c 1 Uhl, t. I
1"011801.18, ...,16..,1", I .'~~.."I"''''I!''' '..,f .,.-, , ,...u. .",... .,.. ,,.... I ..,..,..'h", 1
: I i,I,'~...I;. ,..."..;V~",a 0>1 I '."U'" . ,...." II .11.."., I ,,'uc. 1
I I '".el,'." ,''c,."> ",.~h"','r.", ..., I , .. 9~ ,I I c,.",'.."o..' I
I It.,..,..., ,0'i'"..t...'..,t,8I'(JI"" I CUh,I:". ."alllH'h' .. .... . I .."''''IIJ "I". ,.t.....1 1 I,.... ..h, .,.. I
I I I.h".... ';'"f''' ,... I Ir..,.. ..t.,,,,.,, ,.,.,... ..., ..,.. .. ,....e ,,,,.., ., I u. ... L..II.,. I
. i I I ..,.. \..... ,tee'" :o,t... I C.I";""'.' ;..,. U8 '.... I .nane...hl '.,ac' ..., h, I ..... I
I I ..'" W,~ '.'..8 alllh,!,!,,,,! .811 , 1 ...""".,1',1.', ,.,.1....... I ,."......u... "..U.. I 1
I ~JA'IJI '8C.W""I(8i...a",~,~ijt>~" I I .'I"IA ,,~,ij! . I c..,..a..... .... ..h, .,. I I
I I I "..1' ,...." .. r.,.....t I ....,.. .",."..,.1,. I I
I I 'II.t ..."., ",.a,.... . I '8" II"'. .. co. ..1...... I I I
I 1111I1",Nt1\!); I ".11".. "."a..' '.'8.'''' I ..,.... .. ri,.. ..U"'".. I I
I I li\1i!J *'1 5...""."" ,,.-..,,.., ..,1 1 of co........, "..J L .11.,. I ... .h,.,. .. ...,.. I 1
I I i~!)i,qM I ,,,,,,.,",, .1 ..11 .. I s~,.., II 1I"...4~.'''' ! ' I '''"h'' .. I.,IIU ,.,..,... 1 I
, ..I~j ..,,1 . "t1F.4'U;.~1 ,.',,'...hll,,~~'U.flt"~:A"~'''t1!~1J11 I I ',' "':'" I ....,....t .. ,...-... ... .1, 1 I
., "n..I. . . .'.... ,,,I .co.,H,c....., "."~"""''''''1.'''''''' l.lH ,... ,.,....... ,., 1oc.', I .....,... .. c.....I...h. I I
1 1 .. ,"" I 0".."10. ...,,., I 1 1
I I h'.II' lIu .. ....,.., fI.. I 18,1......".. , .... I I.
: .1 .1.11, L.....,. I".., '.,ul'" I . -". ,I I I I
I I .... Ih.Uo"u"I.,. I I I I
1 I I I I 1
I I 5..,'a., ,.,:1"" t. w"", I I 1 I
1 ' .u. "". '" '0' ,.h,.., . I ' I I I
I I ",,"u18. ,I I 1 I
I I I I I I
I I tUII'" .. ,...'18' '''.,t I I I.
I I '.f.." .11 "'181 '11, ou." ,II' I I I I
I . " . llleeu', .., ., lIu,,' I I I I
I I ,..". I I I 1
I I I I I I
I I On-u'. ,.lIu,18' I'r ,....It III I I I 1
I I c.n'inud eo."ca 0 ,,,,'uel I I I I
'I 1 CDllh....."" .11' . If, It 1 I 1 1
-------
" , .
, 9 . ~ t. ~..'
Lt' q "..
, .
. ,
, ...-.. d ' i\ ..
. ! t. ," !.) ..,
~~lt:j;'~~~'i,t{,';'::' :,f
. "" (.\ .t.~. :,,',\) ,'" 4'!
I ~.. ,,",: . ';~ft:'1>'" I,: ;';.;,>\, . dr' . .fAIU PJ
~ ~!f;',-~~~~~~~,: "':"~'..'~'~~~i I. -:-'.' . ", t 4 i ~ , ~ ,:d ,:. . -'
..............~..........~.~~~~..~~.~~~.~.~~.~~~~....,.",~~,.~~,...!.....~..~...,....~.......................~.................................'
Al '(IINA II II( : '8UlIIlj i"I'{'~ ~h:1f~,"'ltAL, "... IPAtIO... I I 1...I1UIIOldl . ' ,uaue IIUL IHI I COIIII.I 1
I ..011.. I \;t:;'~;/'l,.,~j?,;('J,,\{.' ,",',)j' ~(I . ," , I,' , ''', CO"I.£I~II"'. I, IIVIIIUHII..IAl ',,"U I I
I [051. I ~I\:;'~..,~,,;,~,~ ',,>.",t',\.I"O ,,'Q I ,. ,,,..' I I I
: I III "OUSU"'" ", '-'>0' ~ Y I" ~ . 1 . h.\.. , . .' I I
.. .. ........ .. .. -.. .... ... -.. .. .... ........ - - - - -,- .C'-i-~-~~ ,":,. -...~-~~-~-,~..,.,~-~~-:~_................... "," ~... - -"!!':-t~~~- ~-- "'I: ":"'" -~;':. ~---"t~- ----------- - - --.............- - ----------- -......... --.. -- --.. -- --- -- - - - -........-
: :, . ' I t' ,'", ' ,. '" . . " . I
Iln..'u I "',n.. I. I"".,"""."'''''''..~!J ' I Uh., a. ...a "." .'U.' I ......84 ,....U .. r.,.....a I Uhl" a. ...a., I
Ilru'un' : I "b.....''''''.' "'~(fat~..jl.ltf\t" c,;ca...~.., cr.".''''~ . Ie'.cU.. I. ,"I C ....".. I ..u.. .".." I
:11I1"I'I(.'lonll'>.,,_e..., ','''''It''~ "1;... ;1,;"11.(,..61'.,.., '.'IIU ' . ''',.at U,..." .Ir.d e....ea I ch'.-II' crlte,.. I
I. ' I hl,'jlbJU' \,.bt!i~(>',.,o .~.~ .1,..", 'CI!.'....'."'" .If.et I,...,. "U"..,II ...,..,. I Ie ..61. ...... I
': ,I..... ,.a.."'.')l."."".H""., I ~I".., ,tr.........,~ .C,""" I c.,,",..cU.. . ,,.cld84 I. . h"... ...dl'."'. I
: rl. ,."''''',,,','',, _I~:.a" ... I I ......... I .., .....81, .u.ea .. ,.."lie I I
1 I .M","""':hl.",..(~,,~h.' I ,I,,! d' "1" I """" "',... ".. I"".' I I
I. ' ,"......I;u'. tif~H~1i",O' , ~;I"'.II'" ,..., ...1& .. '''''''''''' I ..te, .. ......... I Uh', a. I
I I 4'11 "t ".. \~ CQlD.1,oG~llo~.,o I ("".'...,...a, ""'..'."U" .. I I ........"....., I
I I ..,~. 10.. ,.....tt',,'~ ,.'..8IQOII :h,,"""'J''';\'1.:1 OfJ .. .N.qb, I I 'I ..c."."., "U,I'.Io. ..... I I
: I I'. 'D. ,....., ,.,....... I {I" ,'tI.,..1 "".'''.' ... I I
1 I <'wh "",,,,,"\'"I'>IJ,,.,,,3- , lllnerC"".."."",.,,,,,..,, . I I
I I II,'",:...."". .,q..,..".." a. tI\ "'..'II".)~.~11~.C8 .U" 'IIU I I I
I I t'~!"I"tI...ull ,..".,..,.,....., I ..:;;'..",... '.. ..'~'... ".II.'J.I I I
I 1"'0" .iI. a' .,.,...; I ("'.:Jr,!,! \"..,,1 JIJ .,.u~ '"1 ,I I I
I I ,1".\ II' ..iI;~ ::,J090;>_f1) "'~6('''f' I I 011-''', ...,.... .f .... " I I
I I <'910" 0,0 l'UI5.;JUv.lt,'o,o"(,J,,~ 1 ,'~'..t."i'. ."r,.,,,,,... C~....C. I I I
I ! "". ,'llIn, Q~ !'IOU gjt' I "'.UII U.'~, .,.,! ..,,1..' .., , I I I
I I ,to'... "bI, I ~, {;t O. qq},~ l...tS 1'>;;1) I it"r,.",''''~'J ~ ~ 0, '~ ~.. '. I I
I I I I I I I I
I I . ,.,"..."16.. ,..... .., I I
\ ".qJfi,j\?' ~?lI: I , I ,....II III ,..II"e' I I
1\ f'(' ~ 0 I ' I ca."'."r,a.'''" .., a. I I I
I ,'>{.II. II I I I ..", a."... ..... '.cII.. .1' ... I I I
""""" 1(" ,'''1 I, I.. ..~ : ",.GlltO'H"'''' 1 I CD"C".'.".,:;....-,...... I I I
" . ... .1 ", . , '" -. I ' ~, . . . " " ' ' '., I. . . I
:' I I . I.ph......... 11...84 ""I, I I I
: I I I "" ..... lA, ......,. I I I
: I I I U......."... II'. .f "~."" I I I
: I I I ' -. I. I
...............~......................~.............................................~..~.....~.......~..............................................
, I
., .
I .
, '/
I
i 1 :. q. (> <1)
.1 .,141'".
~ '
,
.'
!'!to.; ~,~fll' .,
-------
"1
J
Table R
Selected Action - Specific Probable ARAR Requirements
for Alternative 2 - Recommended Alternative
for the Kane and Lombard Site
Action,
Requirements
Citation
Cappi ~
Placement of a cap over waste
requires a cover desi~~ed and
cons t ruct ec1 to:
40 CFR 264.310 (a)
264.228 (a)
o Provide long-term minimization
migration of liquids throug.h
t he capped. area;
o Function wi.t h minimum maintenance;
..
.'
.
o Promote dra1nag,e and r.U nimiz,e'
eros1ono~ ..a~r~sion of tct\e, cover;
. ?:~..; .
. -
o Accomoda~~ settling.: and subs,id,ence
so that the cover's integrity is
mai nta! ned; and
,...
. --
o Have .~ :pe.rmea~~JJ*i5~~ J.ess than .o.r
eQ.ual, t-Q.t,he'.:>P-.e:t',tte ~bJ \ i,C'y oJ; :a;n¥
bot tom l1nttr system. o:rJ: nac:ura,1~:-
sub-soils present.
'. .-"
~1.. -.; -=- -: ~ qO r :: ~ r1 !: ~~-l. :"';- ~". - .... ,!.~ ~.
o -~~'s,tiric;t :,pp.s~~::!.Qll~slu~~. u.~e ,,).f:,~ . >
prl)perty .'1S l1eCeS:i3:'y c') pt"~\".!!1C
- ': '1.5i:4Jftag.~ ",I:,Q; ,:~J\tt 1CO¥.4UI'e'j. ':' 9 ~ :; -' -:: .
.~i.\~~~:~i5.~P - or ~J
O'-Pfe~ent run-on and run-off from
'c-~-'.a~ma~in~. cove.!:',.
~i) r.FR 1"'':'.:!; :.,
J.: ., '0:-:,..-
:!Y"""_"
-. ,.:~-£ ~
~;) cn 2A4. 2:~ (~)
:"Ij c:~ :l6':'.31:..\ (":)
. .
. :-:%.":. _:q~::: -. ~:- :;)._'~~
Clos'ure wi th~'z.! .;~...~];:'t1i~ni~~~'1: J.t- .':Q.I:t.~1..,.i naC;.l:!rl
t".:!S t ~ in ., lace~ ',~ -.- '~:. --.'. .
( . .
(:iyhrid Closure) .'- ~ <.- j,--'. :' l& .,-;.
r.!a:: e:r.ia'ls.
5 ~ FR :~ 7 ! ::
: ~!arc~ 19, 1.,-17)
-..~"'.: 1~~A ~
. -
w - ..... -.
- - .."' . - - .
Acpti cat ion or c.l)ve.!:'...and. !,ost,-closure
"'Ioni to ri.,\1 :~:tsed on .~~?OS ure pat h~.la:..( 5)
"'I!~ ,,:')nl:~!,-;.'
52 ~ >"12
( 'f:t t" C ~ l'~, ! :);-; ;" )
. _. --
-------
1
I
Action
Conso l1dation
Removal of drums
and contaminated
"hot spot" areas.
Discharge to POTW
~
Table ~ Continued
Requirements
Citation
Placement on or in land outside unit
boundary or area of contamination will
trigger land disposal requirements and
restrictions.
40 cn 268 I
(Subpart D)
* Land Disposal Restriction
The selected remedy involves placement and treatment of
soils and de~=is wastes. Placement of wastes or treated
residuals is prohibited underRCRA Land Disposal
Restric~ions (LOR) unless cer!atn treatment standards are
,met. LDR standards have not been promulgated for soil
and debris wastes, but when published, the standards may
be applfcable or relevant and' appropriate. Despite the
absence of ~pec1ffc: treatment standards, the treatment
method employed as part of this remedial action; sati"fies
the statutory requirement to,--... substantially diminish
the toxicity of the waste or substantially reduc:e, tne, ,
UkelHiOod' of-m1g.Tat'1on of Haiardous constituen,,~s~ fr,btJa. .
t'he wa'st:e 90 e:h.I' 's'nort-t'erm'and long-term threat,s" to
human health and the environment are n11nlm1zed.",
[~sec'; J004', "(mT -H.:S .'W .A:" r '.:::-:. . -' ~
. .
::'.I'~ ~ j.: :
~(.,
. -
-
-"~ .
. ~~
Pollutants that pass-throu~h the POTW
'wi t~nou;t L:..t'eaemen,~~;.:.t;~t:er'f~'re' W'tth ?O~.[
c;flfe i.tt fc)n,. '(j,r,.. icoltt;atlifna t: e~ E'~W""s 1 ud g e
.t t:e; ;pr,.o:n:i 1):j:t .e<1'; ? " ~', : ;',1 - :x.: J'::
41) C:-R 403.5
.~:~!~~n ~__f,~-~Ud
Specific nrl)hibit1ons i)r~cludo:! ~ho:!
r! i scna t:f~; 'fffiJpn r:- t'iftJ,fTff';s ~fd ~I:".j:.-r-~(;'; :: h 'it: :
:r:~u=-:-~: .... ...~ ~.G ~S-::9-."'t ~;- : -: - ~(..":"-~
, .;.Create .Ii f;11e..~'::'o'r~pt'dstro.tfi'''tt'i:za'rd in the
.>:j~:S;f~~~~2~:,~~~g~~:. ~-~n ..-. -~-r.::, ~.~O.:.~~ '
, . ':<"~d,j{",::"f~./;+~'-'~~Ar'e C') rros 1 ve (pft' < 5 .,Il). :..~ "'fo. :
. ,..~~I!'~'f$~~<,..,..t ;,~..'" ,re.oJuH'!"~ I,,' .rnt."r;..r.,..,,-
~ .
o Are di3chaqec' at a flow r3tt! and/or- - :",-:. ..:.
conCt!~rr~~1on that will r=sult in
- .
, ~ ,~. i." r:'~'''''f'~ r.~n'ce /' ii'nd ": -', . "-..: . : : :,':',
- ~ .1.'
.. - - ~ .-
... --
- -.-.... - -
) 1>:c.:"'.:'i:j~ ~',... 1:-~!!\j1~r iNlr,~' 'Jr. :"a:):.~~:a:~r
.:'1:: .;:ri ~:~ tiH i:r~at.,e~t ;"'l:H't tl~.:lr: '",olli~
-~.
-------
Action
Table 8 Conci~ued
Requirements
result 1n interference, but in no
case raise the POTW influent temper-
ature above 1040 F (40°C).
° Dischar~e must comply with local
POTW pretreatment prog~am, including
POTW-specific pollutants, spill
prevention program requirements, and
reporti~ and monitor1n~ ,requirenents.
o RCRA permdt-by-rule requirements must
be compiled wi,t,b for discharges of ,
RCR~ hazardous' ~stes to PQTWs by truck.
rail, or dedi cted pi pe. -
""..' ~-...
Ground'-wat er
,Diversion
(Slurry Wall)
. ,
'Excavation of 5011 for consi~uction of
'slurry warl may trigger cleanup or land
disposal restrictions.
... .
Ope'rat ion and
maintenance,
(0, &; ~n
Ci tation'
4U CFR 403.5 and
local POTW regu-
lat ions.
40 CFR 268
(Subparc D)~
40'-CFR' 268
(Subpart D)
c,
- . ~ - ~
""'_.- --..~...
?ost-closure care to ensure that the site 40 CF~
1.5 ma1"rttain-edE:tnd-=:mot'Htored. ~-~ 3"::;: '.' .,'-
:2 ""~. I
,-:-: ~.'
. .
--,.;::Oc:
.--
"1--_: -
- .' .~
-;;-4~l: ....;;;;, .~:t"'!~:':::~~ 'C ~.:: :~~ ~:
"..l~,::.rl.""~ E:-:":';i:i}.~:': .1 \: : ~'"5:=.': ::~=
. :'"\4
.:~:;s: :'_..
- -
-. .; ''t L
:)9.:. 6C' ~ 2 :.-
3:.::: .::;~
t ~:'~~ ~.._-
-:.sr: !~~
~~: .;;~:. .:.~::.. ~_.::.~fr: '\:..9-~ j ':c-02
~ -'~ - 1& ~'1 ~~_: ~r: £=
::;c, . IE
~"" 1 , ~ ,,,. t-,.,~p!~~. ~fh~ ~~ !(:.~; ?,tf~~roJ.u~ ~at~n-
. .--: '.. -":"-t"~"" :..-...:e:v:...:, ~!t
~ ...: .::...
. .
~.Pi ~
::
"F-... -..
. -!-.;..--
.;...i ~.A~~~oot
A
-
~
- - - : . .: ;. .!E ~:: i.;~: ; e~ ~-
::
~... . - .
-_:-.~.; ;~-:;~iw:"
. -
-
- ;. - :-~~-; :.. '?~ e .;,,"? ~ ~ :::
-
-
-
- ..
-: - -, - .
, -
- '
~....
..... . --,
..
.'
-------
1
FINAL RESPONSIVENESS SUMMARY
KANE AND LOMBARD SITE
BALTIMORE, MARYLAND
From August 30, 1987 through September 28, 1987, the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) held a public commen~ period on the Feasibility Study
(FS) for the Kane and Lombard site in Baltimore, Maryland. The purpose of
this document 1s to summarize comments on the FS expressed by residents, local
officials, and ot.har interested' parties during the public comment period and
to provide EPA 'response~ to those comments.
. <
This responsiveness summary 13 divided into the following sections:
. Section I
Site Backgrouncr. ~is section provides a brief site
his~ry ~d discusses EPA "s preferred alternative for
remedial action.
~ -
~.
~
.-
Section II
Summary otJ!!Jor Comments and EPA ReSDOnS.,s.., All
c~mments .are categQrJ,zed by. r."dIiViiit toPicS'~~f ~PA
response~ to. the~~ commen.ts also are prov.id~'~~ -.
. ~
.7: .:
I. SITE BACKGROUND
.. .... . ..... - ..... -
. . ,*..;.,.... - . c.- :. - -. - -
The Kane a nd Lombard s it~ . is ,an. 8.. 4;- aCl'e. parcel Oir undeveloped land
located in Baltimore, Maryland. The sit~ is bounded on the north by Lombard
Street, on the south by Patterson High School, on the east by recreational
fields, and to the west by a trucking' company. Located in the Orangeville
section of the city, the site is situated less than U2 mile from a
residential area 3nd the Francis Scott Key Medical Center.
.. ~
. 'ccording to site records, the Kane and Lombard site was used to dispose
of constructlQJt."",d'/d_11tion dear 1s, household truh, and industr ial wastes.
The Site~-cam.~t:q-~,~~"::~ttentlon of the State of Maryland in 1980 when several
hundreddrtl"'.ii)ler,e.a.t.~'ove.red on site. Followir.g unsuccessful efforts oy the
State to. for~'~t.t~:q.Wiier.'; to clean up the site, EPA r-emoved approximately 1200
. .:-. .~ '-,' - '-'~"',..~_:"", ,"
drums and' .tn.~~surrace::~:'$o"1;'l; l.ayer f'room the s 1 te . EP A then stab 11 ized the s i ':e
by r-egradtrfg:,.';cov,'r&1r.t")\e"sl~e wi~h a clay cap, and revegetat:ing the site
area. In 1984, theKar e and Lombard site was added' to EP A's National
Priorities List (NPL) and in October 1985, contractors to EP~ began a Remedial
Investigation/Feasibility Study (RI/FS) of the si~e. .
. .
Remedial investigation ac:i4i:i~s at the site Lnclude~ ~xamir.ation of ~~~
site's history and currer.t condi:tons ~ith respect to ~urface characteristic~.
subsurface sQii and geologic char~ct:e'ristics I and surf3ce 3nd subsurface '...a~~:-
characteristics. The RI then char3.c:~r~z~d :he chemical contamination
remaining at the site by sampi~~g si:e soils and ground ~ater and assessed :~~-:
- public heal:h threat posed ~1 :he s~:e.
I .
I
-------
~
2
Using information collected during the RI, EPA developed an FS that
describes and evaluates alternatives for addressing contamination at the site.
These alternatives -- known as remedial alternatives -- were evaluated on the
basis of how easily they could be iMplemented, how suc~essfUlly they could
protect public health and the environment, and how much they were likely to
cost. A~ part of the FS, a variety of te~hnologies for controlling sources of
contamlnant~ were screened and applied to the alternatives proposed for
addressing contamination at the Kane and Lombard site. Because of the
presence of other, off-site sources of contamination, the FS was limited in
scope to considering the contaminated soil sources at the site. Described in
detail in the FS report, these alternatives are summarized in the Proposed
Remedial Action Plan (PRAP). The PRAP presents a brief summary of the
remedial alternatives developed- in the FS report, identifies an alternative
preferrej by EPA, and provides the buis for-the Agency's preference.
After careful consideration of the proposed remedial alternatives, EPA's
preferred alternative for addressing contamination at the Kane ancLombard.
site is Alternative 2: Containment. This alternative would involve:
- .
~'
.
Clearing the site;
.
.;:
. ~-
... - ~- -~ " ..,
'. .0-;
-
~,
-,
'. .;:~~
:~:"-
- - <0>
.
Removing drums on the site;
-,. ~ ".-
.,
Constructing ~ -s,lurZ!y, wall below .the surtac..:-ot- 'ttie,'sife
to contain, cont~~nated ground water. wiitt\i~ th. 51-fe arid ' '
divertuncontaminat..~,,~,groun~:,water away' t~olii':thtf:si:te'; --
° "z'.;. 3,..: .;..~ ~ -.. ~ '-': ~ m~ ,., -- -"]J. .
.
Constr.uc;ting a .cag andd'raj;nage, ,channels', to:~revent.
precipitation from seeping through contaminateeVma:t'er'faTs;'
and '
, ,
'~a~'!'~ '".1: '.'" ;~"~J ;'9';;':"':'- :'< -..,-
- ~ ....... -- .. - -- ~~~~ .. ~
,m .- .~\~i.:('~ ..~~~w &r:-~~~D ~,6:-$~~ ."":.:':::4 :-i:Vv'O~" .~:-';'~~~~.3~:; -
..." i 1 e no reduc t forr .:.o~ ~o~hEtr£ £m~dJ f'::,i-;::a:.t>~on :o:£~ s;t:e:- ic'Ont'am~i:rfa~t'io~ -taKe-S-- ;j rs£ e' .
this alternacive focuses on isolating the wastes, in place, from contact ~jth
ground; or sur~~O~hwa~r':!fl-~~tJ -artS;~oI ,r..eAw:'inl/ oe _f.18fft'a.t'1rnf' theR:' ~--
contrfbut1~~: ~~p",~~..r\c~t.~!j\"'2.t 1-o~o': , B~ 1mpi.ement1nl,;st,t"~;~4feur~1-ty; 'mea:Su~~s,
direct contac~'o,d;th'd~aj,te:;.ma--ter ioa1's; _wHl. b:e p.rev.ented;r: --" ::'~ - .
,'~~}f:~_T:~;~-:;ri~41[~:- ' .; - '; . ~ -' -- ~... J~; '.. ~~~: -' .
II, SUMMA~Yi:_O~~jMAJ:QRhCO,M,MEN:rS: ANt); e~~ ReS_P:ONS~S~-~- - .
~~' .....~" .:.' -',: -~ 4~~..~ -:"; ~ '~: ::"'~j:-'~r:-t :-::J"::"'_.-' :.~ ."~J_..!.. ::-~:-' ~..:
EP'A held :.. -pu;rr~- ~oirlmen t" p.iirlod:1Qn the 'f{atif ~d~~7nbar1.F$~ rep.oF"t-:' :-Er~m
.r . <3, ~~.J ,-
August' 30, , 98"- to" Septembei--28,- ~1 9'87 . h ~-pUtrl'i'c me~t'i~k' w~s: heJst ~~ th~~ -
?acterson High School on Septemcef-> 10:: -1~-51 at i:'0
-------
v
..
~
3
preferred alternative. Following this presentation, EPA answered questions
from the citizens about the proposed remedies ana the cleanup of the site.
EPA participated in a follow-up meeting on Sept~ber 21, 1981 at 9:00
a.m. in the offices of Congressman Benjamin Carain (Marylana - D1str1ct 3) to
t:.ief the congressman ana, his staff on the proposed ana preferred remeaial
alternatives. The meeting was attenaed by representatives from EPA; staff
trom the MDHHH Waste Management Administration, Public Information, ana
Community Relat10ns offices; ana citizen representatives trom the East~ood
Civic Association and the BEDCO association.
Questions,. cOllllDent.s, and concerns received during both meetings and
throughout the.comment period are summarized below: and are categorized by
, !"~levant topics. Each coment is followed by EPA"'s'response.
ON-SITE COH'l'AMIHATtOIi
gUest~on:
Many residents asked what chemicals EPA round at the site.
Resoonse: EPA stated that no contamination was found 1n eit~er the air or the
surface water at the site; however~ the soi» 'at.the-slte~w&S contaminatedcw1th
both organic and inorganic chemicals. The, primary contaminant found' 1n '
surface and ,~bsuroface so,i1s'W&! lead'. Othe.t-contamlnants-rSUrid in the soil
1ncluded poly-nuclear. aromatics, (-fHA's»', phthaltat'es; foluerie'~ inorganic,
compounds, ,~d polychlorinated o\tpheny:ls tPcssr'~~_: -: .,,:.: ."'~.'.;.. . ,
. .-
Question: Several residents asked what chemicals continue to remain on si':e.
.. .'...:.:'~::~ :~:.:..: :~"~.z ;<;, ~~,~:41;:,!_. ~:: .-?.;. ~~, .. .:.:.s -: ~L"'~ ~ ~:~... ~~: ~
~esoonse: EPA 'sta'ted that four to tive .tr«re;1~s1,4rema-f~id1::'on -ift~ at':er, ~he
~!"gency removal actiQn. These drums were found ':0 contain r.o~-~ci:..,:
i~er:. cherl!:i~a"l- r.~~tawes'!:-and;:d'o~ ri'o:t [pi:e~e'n;e.:aYn-eiJJ?~iV-;t~rea"~; :;:':~S-" ::. ~ ....
. - ~. ... --,.. d}.~ '4-~ ,""1-;;,0 ~--= ~::\:&ft!""'-""" -.:... <,.-.,"", "-;:_'"; :'. .
-... ,,. -.. ;:,-".."';"Il ~ r.-. ~l% ~""~..J' &fi.r" ':;.....\;01'""" -- .t...... .....~~J .... .,
- ......-. ,.. t:..~~'~ ir1l1. .,0 ... -- _. . . .' , . ,~
guest ~on':'~,~ ~Yj',:r~Sc1~8I:t,~a:' .tJPf!UaR '4cncfifrtt tha~th*' o{-""'~J'e.p~t3~:Jl!tr~ssj;ng :'0: area
chUdre:t- ttt-a.;Jt. th~ s:rte~~s"'illegal: to e.!1~ter.w~t~~,t~'p...r1Di.s.st,Cf.n: ancf::thac..-
unaUtho~'i%'ed""e~:t:-y c6u.~a:'pose' ~ ~~~.l :h- r iS~-'>5: :9~ .: . jO" :', -';.' . -: '.
.~ . - - -~ -. ~. O"J ,-" .::~...= .-: ~-:,': -~;~\' 4[;: ~~:::!.?~-::~.. ~.)::--........... ~_. .
Quest; ion: Several: ir.d1~1 i.dual~. 3~,gie.s,t;~~.::.th~::: ~nw::".e:~i:e;1'ts: :.eL :',~~/e~ ':~a:. ::-.-:
site had' been c.lear,ea--up= by<:.,':hec J 9.8~ emer;g.e~C'¥ r~¥g.Jya:oJ..ion:" and> wer~
surpr ised to learn' tr.at. :;PJ\,' ;,la:-::-:~d~ aC:.:E ':.-cior.al ~,~: Lo"o- a'~ tr.e. s:. ':e',
';:PA' S.a~e.4 .~a~' "\ooe' ,,,~"c' "
-. "".. '"J ..., ~ to .", ..., . . :'\!t ..., .. . .
. - .
~ I' ""~ -,,",.. ;_:"'Q"'S "';":"g ,",,!Q~"'.-'--
..5:. a..a. .;-. .......a.",~ c ':'~~.__.'- .. .,..-. . .... . ... -.~. :...
".. --
- ?escor:se:
-------
.~
ij
emergency site are often left with the impression that once the emergency
r-emoval action is complete that the site is cleaned-up. EPA,noted that after-
the 1984 emergency removal actions, the Agency distributed a fact sheet
explaining that the emergency actl~ns had eliminated any ~ediate health
threat, and that the site wu stabilized. The fact sheet also explained the
RIfFS process that EPA must undertake to develop a long-term remedial plan for
Superfund sites. EPA also noted that during the interim period between 1984
and the release of the final RIfFS report, EPA contractors regraded the
temporary cap and re-seeded the site several times.
Question:
air.
One resident asked if contamination at the site could effect the
ResDonse: EPA said, that there' had, bee~ no detection of air emissions or air
contamination at th~ site.
Question: Several individuals asked what'- the current risk' would be' to an
indlvi'dual who entered the site...
-?,.
-
ResDOnse: EPA stated that there would be virtually no health risk to any"one
who siMply walked across_the-site~ and~the: only' health risk thit existea~ou1d~
restil t from the inges.tion - of con tamina tad - so 11 . '%;ff ~:;;.;.
- . -. }..--: 0 ~ .= ..-.-"=r ~ "..:.:..- ~}..~":
"'. ...;.'"' »
Residents also"asked hO\lf:'long, the. contamtnat1on will stay in the
; ,.... ,;
, '
.
Quest+on:
ground.
'"
..~- :;'; 'f~-: tl:.:': 2-
- . ,
- .... .. - .... ~
-::1~ -.:, .;...: ~-:.;., =~."" ~~.:: .f :'--1 .:, ~ ;.-~ -' -.. ::- - - ,-
Response: The metals that w~~e=-f,01;U1d lr:a.the ground 'at the. Kane:and.Eombard.
site will remain in. ~hat ~oq,~V!t.rtuallyd~or.ever~,;.EPA stated that tl'i~ 'r b51( of
exposure to the metals 'that were buried in the soil ''''as extremeIy.-'slight 'and
that exposure to lead, the metal that poses the greatest health threat, mu~t
occur .for a 'long p'~ri()d::otct~"f:~..f.oce any adver.se ,health eff.Etcts wdti'J:cr~~.'::.
develop. =:?Aalso stated thit the prog.oSed.<>;claYr ,cap::;;.t!q~.. the 'site loiouId'."-'
~liminate any risks of exposure of residents to the contaminants. '
-.., ~
.~-...: ..... ...-:;':" -~ so! ':.'~;B~~ ~f!~~'&:'$-rj' 5n~ .~~. ;-~-;r~ .j~;-.G;~ :-.-..,:: ~.~;:q:~..;'~
~uest :.or.::' ~ .:-es.~,dent.aske,~ -'o!..Q.a~r~~.e.:bt'" i>~k o~~exposu~~ ~~.O', '~e$ir~en't'3 ;j'a:s .~rom
. the' Sl' t' e . - _. ..... - --- ' .. . "" ... .c..... -4." - ..... -.. -.. -- .
:,:~!~~"-; ? ~f~.~ii13~:' " ' "
ResDonse',:'~ 5~i~!s~n4~~_that) ~h4li~on:ly- hea.J:thr"isk:.f!rom .tne 's'tte was:~expdsure
to leadtha'~~":Would-,o'ccur''::if indi'/iduals '~ere on top of the site ~and: wet"~ .
exposed. to~,~ci~~:~f:Q~ii<1FS~'il fot" a lengthy period of time. or directly.
ingeste(r~';he'r-,cf:;:¥;;'>~~P~C~J1f~lim.eqctl't:~~ ~~e ~~it:e pased,n'O'hea-l ~hi::thre'a;:- '':'0;' ~
residents'l.iV:~~t~.tt_1!~~I!E!:L~re.a Q~ ...ttte):I(afJe-~andd_ombard .s,it'e.. ~."'.: :"'~..:::
. ':,.
.
'1ROUND-WATER. ISSUES- ,",-"- G'::---'~ "".....:; "', :::;':,",E'->"~"::,~~'" ~.3.''':'", ':,
:- ..... ~ -....--.....'-'" w- ~ . -
..,~:. :"'::: : - "3-;: - ....- .: ::.."
-
Ouest ion: Residents asked if grour.d-water contami~at:on a~ the Kane ar.d
Lombard si:e ~as,.sii,n,i,~ic~.t.-,;- ':'..:,::~~ :-:-;':".. ::'.'_. -, ",:'i- .- -
j .
--:.. 7,":: ~ ~~ .~= ';".-- L-:'.""~'':; ;'::'--. .~2.-. -=
Rescons.e: E?-; -staiect. that:, ~the 'p~roP.o~ed r~m~i'a-l; ace=-i-:on- a'.t" t11'&' l<'ane' ancj; _..
Lombard' s i ':e does :lot speci,f Leal!.! addr~~s ~he cl~an-up 0 f g,r:ound:-~;..;a-':e:- .
- conta.'!Iir.a:Lan :eeause ~:-ound '...a.te:- ~:i ::he- ~~~r.ea-: ::S~ ;"::'10wrt. ':;) :e. co~ta:ni.r.a.:e':
,. (pote~tLally from ache:- J~':es Lr. ':~e area as ~eli ~s the ~ar.~ and Lo~ta~1
-------
:i1
~
5
site). Area ground-water contamination will be the subject of a greater EPA
study aiMed at treating and cleaning up area ground water. EPA responded ~hat
Alternative 2 best addressed additional ground-water contamination b~
preventing the seepage of surface water through the contaminated so11 thus
preventing contaminants from entering the ground water and by utilizing a
slurry wall to divert the existing contaminated ground water in the first
ground-water zone (known as the first barrier zone) to a local waste water
treatment plant. This plant is designed to treat water more severely
contaminated that the water that would be collected at the Kane and Lombar~
site.
Quest~:
water.
Residents also asked what chemicals were contaminating the ground
Resconse: EPA responded that the site ground water is contaminated prUDarily
with org~n1cs. '.
9uest~on: Residents expressed concern that the Backwater Treatment Pl~t,
targeted to receive the diverted ground water troll the first water barr-ter-
zone under the Kane and ~olDbard site, could not handle the additional waste.
'. .., '"".~ - ,.?
Resconse: EPA responded that - the plant currently is'- undergoing a maJ9r" ~
upgrade that will add to the plant!s.'capacity. Agency starr also not'8d\tbt'
EPA and the State will monitor the plant and analyze its performanc.~. regaroing
its ability to accept and treat~contaminated ground water' f'roll' the s.1-te". .:.1'he
technical feasibility of sending contaminated water collected at the KAne ar.d
Lombard site also will be examined 1n the design phase of" the s!!lecte~_,_.
remedial alternative. If tht~ review ind1cat~s that the-preferred reme~t~l
alternative is feasible, the' plan must be approved b}rboth the State- and._~he
City of Sal t imo r e . - - ' ": - .." - - - J . .. .. . -, h ~.. , ' - -' , '
Question:
:reat:nent
4; . ~":'...- :~ ~.::.. . ~ ~ ..' + .. ~ . ,. -. ... "t ~. - ...-
Residents _a.sked;~her.e the dtve~ted~grourid~wa€~? ~ould~gd'~~ti:;~~e
!)lan t ',s u!)grade:: is:~compJ;ete.;;>-.: .~r,- ;; S" - "', ~ .:. :Z-.i . -..:. .; ~ - 3'.'-;-::
:~~;; ~~; ...; ~;.~~::..~-i*'"':'; ~,":~~-...;~~ :c. -~,-~..'" -i:. ~:£;~-:...~--~
~~soo~se: E?A stated ~hat if the treat~ent ~:a~t is in r.or.-ccmc:iance ~l:~
existing env~~onment'al ;sunc:tardsp th.~gf!o'und'.:water.'ici61!e'etedO'at" the~-:'~a~e:-~d
Lombard site,;wou~,~- b~. tZ:~~,~ed on sit..~~. ~ ~-
Ouest ion: ,~,;~~sohiinf, a:"-~~'L~PAt;to;-:d'e~rcr.:lb~' 'the ~c:nara-c'~e'frS€idi -of" th~~~i~r.St
oarrier %O~~~:,~i~~::'-~~"o_~_:-;"'~' , ~";~;:~;-~'o: - 0" :..~,-'~~~c~ : :~;;~'-
Response: ePA;~~.hf':~~~,:;he :'f'i!r:,st',wa'e'r.'':~a:f€rr-er zone -fs appfoxraTa:irl :'~n~
feet deep and, ~s' ,f'ound'-to],:re:' .con~:am'ina.te'd~--w4.th or'garHc c'om~c5'undS.~:' ::.~~;. ~
Ouestlon: Several residents asked if the contaminated gro~~wi8;~~cd&¥&~~
ef'fect animals and rish.
- - .
: .") ~ ~.-
-~:.. ~~
.... --.
- - . - - -
.
---.-- ---
Resoonse: ' EPA stated ':ha: ::,e ~ge,~c:r Io/as co~ce:"-rfed: aeoUot ::':~e' -p~otec:'£'cn -~:
animals and fish from contami~ation at :he site and resconded ':hat -
contaminated, ground: wat'er :-:-~m :t~'e'-sj,,:~e~ couT-de-~'f~c~- ar.:::~.a'fS: ar.:.j; :-~~~~-~_.~O~.~
gr'Jund '.tater '..as not ~i.'/e-r-':-:d ~r:j ':r~a-:ed. ::?';1. ~oi:'l':.~d au: '':.ha~ :~~ ~r'J;:c.s'~:
- al ':.ernat i 'Ie ~ould addr~ss ':h is: i.-ss~e-.
-------
6
Question: Several residents expressed concern that the proposed remedy could
cause the sewaae pipes carrying the diverted ground water to break.
Specifically, residents wanted to know how this diversion system would'ce
monitored. .
Response: EPA stated that the sewage pipes used to drain the ground water
from the site would ce tested for leakage. EPA noted that the specifications
for the proposed alternative would be examined in the design phase ana tha: a
design that did not meet accepted standards would not be implemented.
Question: Residents expressed concern that city residents were still
consuming area ground' water, noting that an EPA report has Unpiied several
area drinking water wells were still active.
Resconse: EPA noted that the draft FS had indicated that ,there were several
ground-water wells 1n the area; however, subsequent investigations found ~hat
none of these wells are still in use, thUs city residents .ar.e not us~ng water
from these wells and no threat exists rrom contaminatedgr~~d,water.
orr-SlTE COttrAMIIiATIOli
'£'<
...~
Question.: A resident asked if other areas 'surroundfng the Kane 'an'd'Lombard'
site would be investigated by EP~. '7; - ..; , - .~ .
. .,..,. -
Resconse: EPA stated that other properttes tn tne area or:th;~ite (notably
the Picorp property across L.ombard Street) would bef, inv~.~.tig~.te4, by E.PA' for
possible remedial action. EPA stated that each or-~ne properties that were
suspected of being contaminated wer~ considered ~~Ra~ate.from,~~e Kane and
L.ombar.d s:lt'e: and, wou'ld' need'-:to' 'tfelnvistrg~ted~an:d -ranke'a on the. Na.tl'onaL'
Prior it ies L. ist (NPL) before cleanup could beg.in. EP A also sta tede> 'tha: the
Agency would pursue an expedited rapldng, ~!. .t11e. P,l.9_o.rp_.p.ro'p"er:t~ on. ,:r.e !~~L,.
howe,vltt. EPA could' n~t;~p"re<11c.t a-::';'s'tectf<.i'c':'da;t-!!:J9r:'tit~:~a.c~:-~o.n;. ~ :-3, ~~'..~
-.~ ~.oq,."",,~.. -- :.~ ~ .~ ~'9.s... .,....~-..J - -:t.- ~- ~~_......,,::., - --
Quest i~n ~: <1\-. re's:i~:e~~ ;a~kea; why"-':He? \oirro1~?a~i~ ~~~?r.'-6;::C~.h~i~~~a. on~ 3 -L~~
.~ .... -~-~. ~-'~"C: l!:!:": ..~:;£A~ .-:1 r;.-.r....~\~ ~~~-- 5, .........-..-- ..
~:=~:e ~.;~~:{~~~l~tt.:~~~~~~~~:~~:~~:~.,~~~~~!~~hd
separate s~Ud,'1.~~-~ere~;n.:eaed 1:0 address potentia~ cont~ina~,ion at eac~ si~e.
::~i~/r',(7;~'-; i'f the-, ar:-'ea:'play1.ng: n~.ld~- bad bee!'!".
t;ested... ,.,;)._;~.~.:~::t~:~~>~,~~~~~;:': ':._:-~ ;':, ""'.:.~~'~~~ ;r:; -:;- ~,;;-~~,'_.
Resconse: EPA stated that the playing rields_~ur~9~Od~og_tte~~~te had-~een
test.ed and that: no.. haza{'doiis con'taminant's~had~beenJ:>'foun~t "'- EPA: rurth'et: -S'ta~e-:
that there was' no rlsk-:-of'Sf'Uturl! contaminatIon 'becal:1~~-:tfi~"'lead_in;:he_soi:' ~:
':he si':e :.;as'"locked''' !.n~o ';hat7:ofr~n~~;;;~~!~,~~r,~;~r~~;.~a~~{f~om :::~ 3~:,:.
. ',.. ':_..0' -."~ ..,... ..
~ -...- - Cl'" .-- - "! .- .,.,.
Question: One r~sident-asked ;;;r.a~-~e~1! ~ccep~aSY~ bacKgrour.a-le~els
contaminants discove~l!d.
. fQt: ::-:e
Resc:or:se:
E?~ stated that :or
~.;3d,
:r.e-~ri~ar7 'con~~~i~an:
.j isc~'/I!~~d
:~ ::-.~-:
-------
{!
7
soil at the site, background levels along the East Coast are typically 1 - 200
parts per million (ppa), city levels are typically 500 -1500 ppa, and the
levels detected at the site are 1000 - 1500 ppa. EPA said that long-term
exposure to levels of 1000 ppa or greater can result 1n elevated level~ of
lead in blood.
Question:
the site.
A resident asked if there were any additional risks associated wi:h
Response: EPA stated that there were none.
Question: Residents noted that a recent Baltimore Sun. article implied that
residents living' in the Village of Orangeville were effected by,contamination.
Response: EPA stated that there is no evidence that the Village of
Orangev1l1e is effected by contamination from Kane, and'-L.omcard site. In
. addition, EPA stated that the Agency do~s not know where;;, the, newspaper .
received that information, but spec~lated that since,the Kane,and ~ombard site
is located within the Orangeville "section of Salt1JDor.~_:th._newspap.r had
interred that the Vlllqe ot Oranlevil~e was effected by contamination. ...
. .,.,:~:~..!=:~-,..-~:
Question: A resident asked if there were any reports of long-term health~'~:
. impacts from past eXP-Qsure to. ;he site., - ~~ ;,""",:,,~:: /( , ,
. . ~ -- ",-... - -... ...
~ ~ . - ~.8 . ,,:':: i.;,. .. .. .
Response: EPA stated that they were not aware of any reported health probl~ms
that could be related to the sit,e.,.:.. -~n ',-"~ -'0::: '-~-.;,.:;a;~:. ~.._- '.d
. :~"'. ... ~a_- ,,_.J.~ .."
SELECTION: or AGTERNATIV~-
')~
:~._?""'~~ ~,...~~.
- -.:.
~:~..:..: .... ~- .-...
- .
.~~~ .. ~~...: t.:--l:': ~ :.
, ", ' - -:'c _.c:.- 0 -. .-
"
. . .. -' - .....-/ .:1-.;,' ?"';~'j 'n;OC-~'. ~'l;J:..+" :~-'''~~ :::.. -; . --~....- ~ ~-
Quest i.on.,: Ma!\y~ res i:_~e,~~s': ~~"ce:~,,~!~~ ~~~.,~~r~h..eEO -e~p"l~~>inJ -\tnY' Ut,ernat:i 'Ie; ,2 r:ad
been chosen' . - , .'" ,--u.., , - - . ..C
. ~~ .~~-$..J ""'vCJ"t "1.o.',;.S.~- '..~~$~ ....'''l~... "';-.,..- . ---..
. ..' -.". -'....~: ~..'"'t..J. .....";;J _..0.. ~ ...;/'....- :..... .:..... -:..:~""I".- - .,. /- ~.
_...~,... . . ., - -...,~~- ~€;. -:t~: 1f." r''''~'j~i:~~ ;9.. --':,:,~,,~':': ...6 :;)&t..> 'Io.~.. ~.- -~.... ,," .....
Resconse:' 'E?~, st:a~'e~~ ,!:!t~~ej\"'r~terFrta;~i;1'~'::-~4ti~' :;.setec.t:.t!qj ~~eca.u:le) l,t-:::' cou~:. ',~e
i.:nple!nented i:n"a" t'i:lieIY- mannerJ: ~utH1zed a proven technology; protec:e~
~ia~~~l:~ i~_~f~h:~~i~~;~it~~o\~~ ~i~{:~~~~~~~~O~8i~ g~:~~~~a~~;:f~~Et~:~~~ ~ ~
ad~r~s~,~~,S~~,~~~~~~r:,.?~o~~Jn~JeI\i-.)M1c1Z1tS\9yj..sh ~.qortAtj"j1c.t.rt:'r_or~_'~~.:_...:
reasonablecost.~.~,.. " ..,,; . -"1-"'''''''' "=9"-<;>' . >t' --"q
.,_..-. "~~.".\;.~;.-~~;}i'.:::'-',~~t'{/f!;~~~:'~~:i~i3 ""::.:oc -~G~:~£;' :~ '~~~,,:,:n ~-<:~.H ::_~. J:::' 4..~-'~~'~:
Quest~on. Ac',0~u14~~tJ~~ '~ltlng ~hat ~he site had been capped wi~h clay af~er
the 198IPcm,.r8'ttcY,:r~~v~J:~ ~C~iQGS an~;h~~t~is- C3P: oaC rJ!q.ui:'r'ed p~~~hi:r.i,
asked it.' tne~~~~';.Cap{~ouldtlast ~ong. enough' to prctec: res idents from:: s:i(t;e~
con taminat'ioi(~ln'~-th~~tuture. .
~ . . .~ - T" r ~~. - -1~ "......---- "~Q-.T5..of~ ~C;'3 ''''~2~.'': ;£.:.)
. ~ -" ..-.._~';,::o,..-::?"'If~ - ?f'Ii;'t#..1. :::..", !:_.., .~~~ ,.0:.,:;.),. .0,. ~~. --.--------
Rescon~e : E? ~ ~ stat~9:,~na~~~;~e;~~a~: c~p' -pj~c~q 0lk ~h~ J;it~.. af.~e-: the emerger.cy
reMo'ial a~t i.ons-w~~ t~~H~C?~~~y, a~~::.t~a.E:, ~;~ caQ:: g1at1rted~ rQro.t~.ez.~on~~;t~r~;.,-
,remedial respon$e,~oura ce_lJf a dJffet"er.t:;ge~~i!:l ~;,-i~h"bas~o.een~u.se~,-:'.
e~ter.si'lely andbee~ pfo'len to-S~,~tfic~i'le. SPA also seaced :hat the cap
Ioiould be monicor:-ed for,3t ~er'iod_,of 30-/.~a~~:-~n~'_~fJ~t~t;~:ca!, could':e,f"ea~:-~-:
. .. ."~..,. -:> . . - 0." ~ .... - -
if r.ecessary. - . .-: 0:--'.':(:-:;:" -, ,.'
Se'leral resi:er.ts '...ar.:e-:...:o i<::?w,',.jhy'-!;h~.coO:~i~a:e1 so~: 3: :::-=
Question:
-------
~
8
site could not be excavated.
~. EPA stated that the Superfund "Amendments and Reauthorization Act of
1986-rSARA) was written to emphasize permanent on.site treatment rather than
excavation and removal. EPA also cited the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA) that bans land disposal of hazardous wastes after November '9~8.
An additional concern regarding excavation of the Kane and Lombard site is the
length of time that this operation would require (EPA estimated that
excavation would require the removal of 8 cubic acres of soil), and the
potential for spreading contamination through soil and dust that this action
could cause. Finally, EPA stated that with excavation, it is virtually
impossible to ensure tnat 100~ of all contamination would be removed, thus the
site could potentially still require addltlonalremediatlon after excavati~~.
" .
Question: Several residents inquired if the type" of cap proposed for the ~ane
and Lombard site was In use at any other sites In the area.
Response:
Landfill.
EPA answered that this-type of cap Is used' at the Sully Roaa~
~
.1-. ~.- ~-
Question: An Individual aslced if the proposed cap wO\tld- caus~ s.urr~ce wa~er
runoff problems at the site. ~ .. :y:'"
" "
- - .
=::r::"<... .:_:t
Response: EPA said that no runoff/erosion problems currently exist at the"
site and that ~gency staff do not foresee the cap creating new runoff
problems. As-part of the prelerr.ed~remed1al act~on~5the' site-would be- . -
regraded to min~ize any future p~oblem wIth both runoff-and erosfon or the
top soil and/or clay cap. . -. . .
.- - -...
. -
:.- ~
- - -, _J.." ..... -.,.. "":""-:~.- _. . i:.'''' . ~ -.. ;"'-. ---~ -.". ,it :-: '. -. .;.:- '" --..... ~ -. . ,; ".f cu
Quest ion: Sever-al _r~s id~t~~;w~r;;~co;ce~neO :;that: -~~e - c"fai '~C:ap :oicuJ:fc:To~<-::"'{i::
long enough to protect future area residen"ts;~~' - ~"": ~:: .~. : .1-"':.- - - , ~ --
2esconse:. EPA, stated :hat' bhe<:csp ioIoa1jtj' !Se;"':norfjft'6'F~cf - irli'UJaJfll and .thai"':'@~~a::y
, - - .. - - ... - - ~--;, - -... -. 0:;. "" . ~ "0., ~-t;:t -'j."':J -"'-~~,..
pro b 1 ems aros.!!t '-c:~h:' ~calt c cou.J;
-------
~
9
the 30 year design life of the ~emedial ~esponse. EPA also stated that the
Superfund law, which regulates hazardous waste sites, is designed to oversee
the treatment and proper disposal of wastes at .hazardous waste sites for the
life of the threat from contamination. '
~: One individual asked who would be responsible tor the health and
safety or area residents if an unanticipated probleM arose with the prererred
alternat.ive some time in the future. .
Response: EPA responded that even though the site will be monito~ed by the
State, EPA would be responsible. ror correcting any naw in the remedial
alternative and would:maintain the authority to act imIIsedlately if such a
situation evolved.
guest~on: An individual asked if any special security measure would be taken
a t the site to preven ~ future dump-ing..
Response: EPA stated that no specific security measures would be established.
at t.he Kane and t.olllbarcLsit~ other than' maintaining the. existinl fance. A.s
part ot the operation and maintenance pha8e, however, the site will receive
regular inspections. EPA further noted that citizens can help protect the.
site by reporting unU3ual 9r increasec2 activity at the;: sit'e:durlng this:. ptiue .
. of the cleanup. . ~... . .. ~,. -:~!f
DISPOSITIOII or UJm
. .
~ :. - ~ ...-"-
. ~ . . ~.
-
. ""0:...
~ .... .- :. ~..
. ~--.... .....- .
.,.....,,~ . ; .'!~--.-c.~ ,:..~... ~.... . .., - .'~..... ...:.. ,...:..,
Quest~: A .resident :asked-: wh.o _g~ed;the!;lsit'e': peoperty"andi:.why" the"'-ownerfs)
was not being. to required to-p'a~:for~cleantlp'costi. i. ~~--;;.;' - .: .. .
,.:,:, >.s~:.
" -
- .
Reseonse: EPA ~espon<1ed that the owners name could not be ~elecised, .but..EPA
was involved 1n enforcement action to ~ecover the costs~ol~t~e~c~e~riap-r~&m
the owner. EPA stated that the cleanup had commenced prio~ to t:he :-eco':er-y of'
~hose costs. :~.o .;,t;at -:..~E!A ~~u~~.~~t4Q'H~ze.")the '\st.~e9~ ...artd'Z~r.ote"Ct - numan ,tiea.E.:~!.a.nd
':he ~nvir-onmer.t 1n a timely man:'\er,O)Z::,~~': ~-='--:.f ~-..,:.;-. ;:;5.::-'"::;; j': .,~-.;:~::- -~. h
Question.: One. res,ide.n'bukeG-what IiLOttl~ b,e.,:dorre wtttt tt'teGRandCittei:~,tfi.:.:::':":
constz:'~ctLon. :.;~~ r~_~~~k~~rn.~,~.v~EwU[compl.t!.',;' - SlJec$f;rcally;' ~tn.2res rden t
asked .wha.t. th&1,lancti.\~\t1tct\i\,' ~ .t-or' iirt.J:h:e. ~~ce,. ,Ls:£>- -:::'-:.; .--1~~~ ,.:~~. :;~:.a ~':':':":Oj':: 3 ;:-:,--
. Reseonse:. EU;.'~:~4t~(~r;,~~it.K~'.tt.. dO,es 'no.t} .hav,e:-t i;c;]:e 'to; tl'te. r~ncf;.-tnerefor'!.':~'!
Agency cou14';i~~~iPIk!?lt!~,~,~~p.~~i::ft.Q;.-answer',: .eaA \IfOint:e~ OU~; "how-ever,- ~ha~
any futureuj,-';"otJ ~tf.I:;I:aJJd',;;~-la. ~need sto' rec'~Ho"., .a;.:1:and:-use pep~1:'t' ff80rr .E?',\' o~
. ."-' ....,,- ."'.' ~'.- ---. ~ . - .~.. '.- .. .
the State, and':'thatany:-proposed future uses would be examined ca.reful: y to
ensure that the, use. p-os~ .nQ,r:.th,r,eat, tQ}.human> t'te.al~tf .a'ftd '.;~tf~~en:*;rrona1en,,::;',,~::.:EPA
f'u~ther noted that 'because of the nature or the contamination at the Kane and
Lombar-d site:, and tl1e ef~~:t o't: a: .p,ermanentir-capft .'th.e. .s:~e coijir~' bet.i's.ed1as": a
scorage. area., f'o'r.,J:ustr:_eScs~cS" ~~~ ''::he:',ic'mr!':.:f. Q~: -the' s:lt!e ,-Ire. :;;~*e -:c'1.ai":ca~p-: ~~s.
covered by an asphalt cap. . Q' ~. _.
_.._-~~~:: ~~
: .: .~ ~ ~ '. ;:. ",? .
-- -- ~
- -
~.'
..
-------
~
10
SCHEDULE or CL!AIIUP
R.s1d.nt~ as~ed when EPA. expected the cleanup to begin.
Question:
Response: EPA responded that the Record of Decision (ROD) was expected to be
signed by the end of September 1987, and 120 days later, E~A and the State
expected to cegin the design of the selected remedial alternative for the Kane
and Lombard site. Construction of this design could begin within one year of
this step, and the preferred remedial alternative (Alternative 2) would take
about one year to complete.
. .
," .. -...
-: &ii:~r.'
- -;-.: -
- - __0
7
.... .... :. - '14~
. .
- - .
-'
'~".I~ ~-
o! ; ~ ~ ~-.'C
- .
~ .:. . ~ ~ :'J :::. ~ ;' ~ .. ...
"~~T'~ '-~if'~:~:': ~ '.- .~i =" .1. >::~ ~--
~~ :.-5..A
. ~'~..~:E -:_':.:'--';~.--".4 ~
~:_.~~--p ~~?::
. 1-~;~..:.;.~~q;r:
. ~g ~1:;n,5~~.~
-- ."""V
. .::"!'. - ~
=,---~--
--- --,- --
.-"";:" ctD~!f~ . ~ iW .. '"j~ .11e~: ~ s.,l
_.'~5~r.: .=,
d.$:=..;1 ~ _~jl:z..- ;~-S'1.1Z ~:nd~rnJ' ~~~
...~':..to
.:: '~srl'qs-j- ~
""!:.',
" ."..
-,
.. - ._.- ,
--
9r:G~
;~ zS,,!~,~1:~
::-~-:"'
..
;l~~~'j?f.'q.c":tQ .~
",- "'r",. '$""':;)."'~Q) ",!~v:sJ{- 'r/ -
-
j -J-: .:.
!-'
.......-.-.;
;.. :...
-or .8!i~;=- 2
-
.
....- - "- ~-
:~
~:. J"-""'.:
. ; -,; 2:.-
- <
..
. -
. .;ji:; ;;:'--5.-:-:;C!~m o-~
;:;$!'-;:::
~ .. :':!'.. ~
-------
~
~
KANE AND LOMBARD STREET~ DIUMS
SARA ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD .
INDEX OF DOCUMENTS
Site Identification
1) Memorandum to Mr. Ed Shoener from Hr. Harry Compton regarding soil vapor
survey, dated 10/15/86. Soil vapor results and map are attached to
memorandum.
2) Report: Potential Hazardous Waste Site Inspection. dated 5/16/84.
3) Chronology of events at Kane and Lombard site, dated 5/1/84.
4) Potential Hazardous Waste Site Identification, dated 4/30/84.
5) Complaint and Order filed by Mr. and Mrs. Azraeland Ms. Cele Landay
with the Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, dated
10/23/83.
lemedial lesponse Planning
:,-.
Jr.'"
~
1) Letter. to Mr. lonald Nelson from Hr. Tho..s Voltaggio regarding
chronology of events since the lemedial Investigation/Feasibility Study,
dated 7/16/87.
2) Report: ~dial Investigation Report for the Kane and Lombard Street
Site Volume I - Technical leport. dated 5/87.
3) Report: lemedial Investigation Report for the Kane and Lombard Street
Site Volume II - Appendices, dated 5/87.
4) Memorandum to lis. Stephany Del Re' from Mr. Gary Sheehan regarding July
1986 te~t pit program at Kane and. Lombard. Street Site. dated 9/15/86.
5) Permit: light of Entry by Raven Corporation and Sky .propartie., dated
7/31/86.
.~~~:)T~t~?~~;.,. .St;~~:~
6) Record of CO-Uft1.4:.;tiotf':~-,~Meeting With Mr. Richard Mason, dated 7/30/86. .
~\~:::il~~:'i.. :.~~:~~'~f'~':~
7) ~tter to,. Hr;~jaf~~rd.M4sqJL from Ms. Stephany Del Re'regarding permission
. to take sampte.t~date4~~tiGV86.
- ".~~~.~-:., ";:.~' -' - .
8) Letter to Mr. Kinloch N. Yellot III from Ms. Stephany .De~ Ie' regarding
permission to take samples, dated 7/23/86.
9) Memorandum to Ms. Stephany Del Re' from MS. Tracy Lacosta and Mr. Charles
Kufs regarding results of Phase RI .- I sampling. dated 7/21/86. Sample
results are attached to memorandum.
. Administrative Record available 7/31/87.
1
-------
"
10} Statement of Work/Spec~ficationa regarding soil sampling, dated 7/14/86.
11) Repore: Initial Site Evaluation and Work Plan for Kane and tombard
Remedia11nve.t1gation/Feasibility Study Volume I, dated 5/29/86.
and tombard Remedial Investi ationl
13) Report:
Historical Development of Kane and Lombard Site, dated 5/19186.
14} Letter to Mr. Thomas Voltaggio from Mr. John Koontz regarding comments
on x:esedial work plan, dated 5/14/86.
15) Letter to Hr. John Koontz f~08 Hr. Tho..s Voltaggi~ regarding draft work
plan, dated 4/10/86.
16) Memorandum to Ks. Stephany Del Re' from Mr. Cbarles Kufs r.garding. 0
Addendum number one to the revised Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study
work plan. dated 4/1/86. 0 - .~~.
17) MelDOrandum to Me.o Stephany Del ..' fro. Mr. Charle. lull regardIng Icat.
co_ents on Kane and Losbard s1te.- work plan.- dated 3'1-11-18".-'
.' . -. . .: ---, "=2.~~ - ~- -
18) Letter to Mr. Tho... Voltaggio froom Mr. John KooQ~z_z:.g,rd1~I,file ~e"I.~~-
for the work plan, dated 3/10/86. ., -'" ~ - . 0, -, - ~~. 0 . -
- 0'3 -
.Jor' -
..;
J) Memorandum to Ms. Stephany Del Re' from Mr. Chartes -Xuf~~reg~rd!ng results
of the site contamination survey, dated 1/16/86. Map~ an~ soil s~mp'le
8uIIIIDaries are attached-to~memorandum." :..' -~'- o~ 0"'; . - 0-
20} Brief ing . for Ms.o' $tep~~y.~~!: -~!!_': ':{t!~:..-Mr .!_Il~; ::RU:~:'r.e_gii.Jrni:-~t'esu{i~; .of. :. - :. ~ .
geophysical--survey at Kane and Lombard site. dated' 1=2/3'0/85'.-" . 0 --=-.- -.--
. .'
Memorandum to !is. Stephany Del Re' from!'ir. CharleS' i~.ts' ~re~ia-:i~;irii rOesu"lts >.-
of the geophysical survey of the Kane and Lombard 51 te, ~It~e_d. ~12/:}Ji85 .." ~ :-?,p
Maps and charts are attached to memorandum. . +'-.- '- .- - o' -:.
22) Memorandu1Do~ t~i_o.~Sctep~r€;~'],')-. '\:.:-tt'oii Hi:;' Cb&:r1~'\:.~~Jil!"ra1.~I;", :-0 -.(; \ ~~ ,'-
results of .1,~..,.)'~.10D:-<.....smen~,~a'r.-eCf n""2!18~~ 'Map.~a.na~ pho~ograpJts
are attached-t"~!~~;~~d?~(' :~~;~., 3'. . .~:")J'~--":' ~:~-~-~;~~~ ':'~~~
23) Report: Work. 'Plaft~;fcfrUne;J_an'ct' I;olllbal'Cf- '51te:1remeCila.lA Inye'$~"1-gatlonl
o Feasibility StuCl-y~-VolWleI.cdated 6/5/85. -';'-"~--
21)
. .
24) Memorandum to Ms... S.tephany" Del-; Re:':..ftoaa;_~t;:: R.. ~ .I;e;;~.'!te.lrl8.i2.riij.E'dl~gi---
schedule of deliverables~' dated4/29 /85...::" .:".:.' - -==.~~~, 3:;; ~:L -,---'
-']--:~'
.-.- --
25) Action memorandum to Mr. Stanley Lask.owsk.i from MryoStepnen Was-siis~g':
regarding authorization to proceed with a Remedial Investigation/Feasibili~: -
Study at Kane and Lombarq site, dated 3/21/85.
-~) Letter to Ms. Stephany Del Re' from ~r. Guy Hager regarding review and
-recommendation of Investigation and Feasibility ~tu~y, dated 3/21/85.
2
-------
~
"".I
27) Report: Public Health Evaluation (undated).
Emergency Removal Response
1) Daily log notes, dated 6/6/87 to 3/30/87.
2) Letter to Mr. Bob Caron from Mr. Warren Black regarding ERCS delivery
order at Kane and Lombard site. dated 3/26/87.
3) Memorandum to Dr. J. Winston Porter from Mr. James M. Seif regarding
request for exemption from six 'month limitation and continuation of
removal activit!'es at Kane and Lombard site, dated 1/22/87.
4) CDCLA i_ediate removal p-ollution r,a2orts, dated 6/5/85., to' 3/6/84.
5) Letter to Mr. Richard Warren from Mr. Thomas P.Eichler regarding
imediate removal action at the site,. dated' 6/15/84.
-;Ji": .
Kane and Lombard Streets Haaardou.' Was~e Site'
7) Report: '11181 Report of AnAlYtical Servic.. f,or Pro~'ect: 1828 - 116 .-
Kane and Lombard Street Site. dated 6/13/84.
1: ,'?
i;"-:fO"
.j '~.";,,
'.- - "'::-1 . ~ ~... :..:-. ... ~ ,,,-
to Mr;"Tho... p~ Eichler from Mr. Warren K~ Rich regarding iimpllng
dated 5/15/84. Chronology of events. letter. envelope. and notice
are attac:hed,.to l.tter.~~""': . :::1. =~:~ '...~~ ~~.. jLr:~-.~7.~ - - .....
~"" ". -. .. - - . -;: ... or ~ . -' - ~
." ".. :. ~ ;- .."1 ~ £? ,,~ ,. . ~:.... .,' o~... ,~~ _: ~ ~ - . ,\.;" ::...' ~-:::;.;....:. J; -: - ~
9) Air and Cont'ractor MOnitor Log. dated 5/1~L84<;to;:,.61r4"84.;)c ,'- ~ <_!L.
Recrc .,.Kari.",.'aft'ct.:.~1I6ard '!!tri'etjl" -: '''''.~£~ &'!Mio~,'&~;},OO~-.~~:J; l~\;$V~~';~:1>=:'=~~;:~~,.~ ~"'~~
12) AS! Log'.'daLt'ed'51~r84. - . .:!lUbiJs'oEf~at ~5 :-:,r!"'5...j~13 9HS ?.. ."'..- .Hi?> -,,~
13) He1lOr.nd~.~ .t~~~~i-l~.~~J~~.~J J~!l!> Mri~{ ~., .Elehrert.r..I.ra;l~~ U8~tiIf1.e.trOitoc:2
for' a pprot~1:;r~(4:~;!"@t~.{8J _re~~:v'~;l -,eU~1\.: tda.t'.cb~S'I.;,4 /i84~.~ ""Fulfcf-1ifg reque s't.,",
maps. cOtl#ta~!tt;~~~'~~:-~J'ifhi.P'hotographs are attached., ~rc.!}~;,' ~~ -:; -:. ..-"::" - ': ,.
. . . ' ':%;.~~':t>.:J.t'\):~:~jlh1:~~~: ., "" ..
14) Record of~~~~p~~~~~:~j!~qt~~~1~.:~ ');1 JJ;~ . <.'
. -. ,.- ..
-. .
.:~:-r.c..::
~-- .... '$
~ -: :aU::;-:"'"
~~..E )~~~ :--
.. .,.. -.. .
..... ~ ."
;I. .
3
-------
Community Involvesent
1) Record of Co88uDication from Ms. Jill Bloom regarding information on Kane and
. Lombard, elated 8/13/86.
2) Excerpt from the Hazardous Waste Site Repo~ regarding the planned Remedial
Inve8tigatioD at Kane and Lombard site, dated 6/23/86.
3) PreS8 release from U.S. EPA regarding commencement of Remedial Investigationl
Feasibility Study, dated 6/9/86.
4) Fact sheet regarding EPA role at Kane and Lombard site, dated Spring 1986.
S) Kane and Lombard on-site d1.c~~8ions regarding ..etiDi. with community
8mbers, dated 5/8-9/86.
-
'- .
6) Me1llOrandum to Ma. Rachel Pohl from Mr. Ronald Nelson regarding Kane and
Lombard draft community ~elations.p~, dated 12/4/'~. '~
. .
7) Fact sheet regarding work completed _at 81t~, dated .7/85!. ~ ia
o' -
. . "'i..:- - .. ~ '.4 ",.. -:.. -i-:
8) Fact sheet regarding-health and environmental infQt'1II8tion, dated 6/261.84. J:
9) Clo.e-out m8110 for leaDe and' Lombard pu6ii~ -m~ting;' d~'{ed -6/26/84. :~:: ~:t
'0) Public Notice regarding comm~itl ,..et.in& co_nceming,;~~. ~~r.40_u.\ wast-e'
cleanup at'- the Kane and- tombard' -s'fte, -d8ted'~6126l~4 .-:: ~? - ~::: . :"'} - '2- . ~ .
11) Agenda for the Kane and Lombard sit.e .pJ1bl_1c. ._e.ting"if '~t~e.dJ 6;!t:2fs'18~~.g-:, - . Q . - .
.-- :.;';.;GJo:.. ~;"::-~~~ ;;'.-:::c :'t.-~ "'lo:}.--: '.,~'")-:j-~ :.-:...f!!'J,=
12) Press release from U.s. EPA r_,ardlng completion of cleanup at the Kane and
Lombard site, elated 61}~(~~4~. ~~;;~ ,-9~ ~(;£L.;_c:j~':.r~~(A.. ..i.<::W~/ ~~ .~ ',:l1':P.
13) Fact sheet regarding the X.De'l~f ~p~rd.~IJt:(".-~Z!E~~~ "'.f~~'~ c~..nup~;~ dat'ed~
6/25/84. r~. .J-'~ .-. , .
.....r::> .. - .- . -... ~...:J"8 ---~
Y . -- fr'r)"an. . 'b"='"r~~ l-A~"'; .1"\,0:-1 ~ :;:...":-f!",'9:r~ \.~~.;:V~~;:.. ",,:...';. ....... :J .',:'" -
14) congressional:3.~~irY!~.~tJSi'"lita'iDg tTie ICane, ~~~:1~!lH~r4: p~blic~meet1ng=F'-
dated 6122/8.,.~~;:.:.;.- !..:i;:. ::, '.:;>' .
. );, .Z2::0':"'i~;=,,'J:}l/-''':.'''~.':~~'~:.
is) Press re1ea'~j)~~!c)ii' U~$.:;~~~t; regarding public meeting at ~ne and.;; ~mbard:,rez-.:.-wo:. -;
site, ~ted_~~~;~~~J~.\~:~,}K:~({._..,~~,,- _.....~.,,~-, ~~Ql~~~:~~~V;~ .". :~-
16) Press relea..~~to.,~~t~t?;~!:~rt~a~~.~~~t~~~~;~~~~l~~~!B~:Mencal:Hyg1ene,
regarding com1!le:i~~ ~~f ;~ne'~~~d I:~!I~a~l<.ti\~!ft~R~~d~t~.d~~I~~'~8j~:i ...qd ,~~4:1 .Hy.g:lene,,'
regarding prosp"~~iv!"i~lIIo"!.~.t.~~ :Wa'ife~,,'at' ~~ft~a~..~.I!~a~ct~St~.e~t,s)I2~. ~ '.~:;"-
dated 6/1'/84"., .- . - - - .'- - . - : .
'8) Fact sheet regarding health effects allegedly caused by the removal
of . hazardous .waste and tt!~ previous. .accWDuclat1on:.of wali;.te ~t.;..the: site-,
da ted 5/31/84. : '-' . - -- . - . - - .'.'0 0 . .
~ --. --......-
.- ,
-
4
-------
~
~
19) Memorandum to Ms. Helen Przybylski from Ms. Linda Smeyne regarding
weekly update on t-=../"~':.-;: .
27) Congressional Inquiry/Request regarding- !nt:o~~~on in Pt..ss ,rel....e ,,~dated<'-. .
5/7/84. .. - J.
-
. - - - -,' ~",' ..'fl ,~. ~-K.' ~.,.~ ..'.' .
28) Fact sheet regarding 1:lIIiIIedlate-re!iQval:"of na.urdo.U8..was.t.e$ aC-'Kane; and ,', ~
Lombard Streets, dated 5/7/'84'.<' -- .,.: ...J L, -.' ....,.-. - , "
. ,
.- - -. - '." ~~...:l - -:,:3~-: ;13 ~.~:l,,",f "J ~ ... --
29) Press release from' U..-S. EP~'regardrrfg- TIIIIIUt(f!ate removal of drums at Kane and
Lombard Streets Sice in Bal.tillOre, ~.t.ed .~.!l/8!t',~ .'. ~C": ,'r. ., '"..q', '" ..'.' ': ,~o':, c,' ,.
1) Suamary of coticeftr:ra~i.o'it.~'ic-"f inorganic COilp'OUDd~ _and "s\Jb$urfac;e -~sO;il. i...-: - 6:' ;5~~
.' ._~..:~. ¥.. ~~.~;:..., .;-~~...., .{10i":-" - ~.. ;c<;....., : -c~.\'. £J;:- ~ ; :.,....- ..-J ... - - . - - .
dated. 9./12/86., Su~ry ,in;~~ad~s ~~~~~~j~~~ .0Z!.'1!a~,,<~.!. ::.~~btl.!1:9U.gh ~t:.... - --'-.'-:
SD-18, SS-oI througli SS~S ;'~TP-A' rhr6u'n TP~, and TP-P through TP-Y.
- "":'1~ - - .J': f.: ..."'~
~ - -':. '"'~- - -r"" ~ a... "'to '1 ~J-~ :,.;Q': ~ ':'~,;Q.,-..:. j
~~~l~~~Kuf:s frOtA .~.. -.~~~~1je' .n\-:'~li,:~~e'4z:.~~~i;~"-:~ v- .0" :)":
801- 'through CE- 818; and CE 8r9' through CE 829, 4a.1ted .. ;:':. < -
2) Memorandum to MI".
sample numbei~ CE
7/18/86.
'. * '" ~ '"
.....J;r .
:Ht::J~~~
- .~ ~ ~ : ~ £ ... ~. ~ ~g,. ~:--=.{ ; ': .::.. . j"t : ~ ~ r: ,-'
-~~
*
.. .. .. ~l~;;'. -
Data supporting the- sUlDDlary sheets 'is l'oc:!ced '-at the "EPA Reg~on III: Cenc-ral",
~egional. Laboratory in Annapolis, Maryland.
~..
5
-------
~-
'-'1
'1
I
3) Memorandum to Mr. Stephen Wassersug from Mr. Carroll Wills regarding results
of RCRA characteristic tests for wastes from the Kane and Lombard Streets
Site, dated 6/26/84.
4) Me80randu. to Dr. T.. O. Meigls from Dr~ J. H. Lowry regardinl ICIA ignitability
aDd EP tozicJty characterization ana1y.i. result. tor drua .&ap1e. collected
fro. lane and Loabard, dat4d 6/2'/84.
5) Meaorandum to Mr. Bob Caron frOli Kr. Daniel Donnelly regarding .a.p11ng,
dated 6/6/84.
6) Memorandum to Mr. Daniel Donnelly from Mr. John Austin regarding samples
840517-01, 840511-03, 840511-04, and 840521-01, dated 6/5/84. Raw data sheets
. and chain of cuatody reports are attached to memorandum.
1) MemoraDdum to Hr. Daniel Donnelly frOil Hr.. B. A.= SallllOn8 regarding .a.ples
840'11-01, 340517-03, 840517.-04, 840'2 r-o 1 , and 840522-01, .dated 5/25/84.
Pesticide/PCIs priority pollutant compound detectioD~lait. are attached to
memorandum.
8) Memorandum to Mr. Daniel Donnelly fro. Kr. 1ic~pr.i.ch:relarding ...ples
840517-01 throqh 840'17-04-, dated 5/21"/84. .
- -
..: - . -: -. - .
.... . ~
,1
.J
~
.::
_,4 --- - --. ..
--
~":.:.~~.
.'--. - - -
- _. . .
~. ... - - . .. ~
- - .. --' -'.
- -
:.5....-
~-:'_7-.~1 .:..~~.
- -
---..--- . - - -~-",'
~ .,--;:.. .
-~~~--.a-~~~'--~~~ --.:~~~ ....:..~:. --=-~-,~~..;..
- io-'""''''':i';'.-
""-~
":''= -:~. . :.~
~ ~~~~~~-..i-~ -
"'...;'~~
~ --,-,~
"i..- ... ......,.'5. .
~. J"", ----'
..:!.... .....J. ,#....,...
. -...-
.. --- ..
- --~ -~ L-~"i ~
~.~..{:'~\01 :9.J~-
. ~!Zi.1"e':~~. ~5-=:?b9,
1 l";~);": ~/-:;.~: ~ ~-:"- ~.~ ~,;:~-=. ..
.... ~ ~ t>. ~ R "'"n'" . -,0. "1 .,4 < -- -:: _."'...A- f7 ... , :: -;
. ; !"'t..-<;. .i<'~~t':;.... ""-=J;;.. . ",,,,,.,,
-------
GEN~ GtJlDAOCE r:.ca.J.1EN!S *
1) "Promulgation of Sites from Updates l-~,ft Federal Register, datea 6/10/~6.
2) .Pr~al of ~te 4,. Federal Register, dated 9/lb/Q5.
) l'1eJrOrandum to U. S. EPA fran Mr. Gene Lucero regarding CCIIIIIJnity relations
at Superfund Enforcement sites, dated a/2~/6~.
4) Groundwater Contamination and Protection, updated by Mr. Conalci V.
Fellclano on a/~~/as. .
:
5) QJidance on Femeeial Investigations under CDCIA, dated u/85.
G) ~dance on Feaswility Studies under CEICIA, dateci 6/85.
i) .p~~al of Update 3,. Federal Register, ~ted 4/rU/85.
S) ~1e1'll:)randur.1 to U. S... EPA fran Mr. Jack McGraw entitled .CaraJnit~i Felatiol'\S
Activities at Supertund Sites - Interim Guidance,. dated 3/22/85. .
~) .PrC9CJUl of Update. ~',.' Federal Register, dated '1..0/1.51t~ .
10) EPA Groundwater Protection Strategy, dated 9/ij4.
. "-:: .
11) Menm'andum to U. S. £fA fran l<1r. William N. Heckman, Jr. entitlecL,.--rt'aJisr.tittAl
at Su~rfunci Rerroval ProcedurGS - Revision 2,. dated g/2'w/o..
. 12) .Pr'cposal of U~te 1," Fe:?~'~;\:,~1>~:~:'::.::.' .:'.."
'. :.~:.:.;::}~) Field' S~CL.¥~atiric;
.' ,t-' ' . ;~;~<.". -' 'l~~:\'\~f~;~w~,r::':f :<;<-~.-:~-,_.,~jt~~i£-,~;;. '<.>. ~. .
.' .' l~) Field'~:~td'::~~atl~
. . -. , -' ~ }'"
Procedures- Air SUrleillance (undatt!C).
Procedures- Site Safety Plan. (undatca).
. .
*Loca~~~ in u. S. ~?A ~ion III o~tlce.
,.
------- |