United States
Environmental Protection
Agency-
Office of
Emergency and
Remedial Response
EPA/ROD/R03-88/061
September 1988
&EPA
Superfund
Record of Decision
Kimberton, PA
-------
-~01)"Z~'JOI -
REPORT' DOCUMENTATION-',''"1:-REPORT NO.
"AGE' EPA/ROD/R03-88/061
. 2.
3. Recipient's Accession No.
4. Title 'and Subtltl.
SUPERFUND RECORD OF DECISION
Kimberton, PA
irst Remedial Action
"f. Author(s)
5. Report Oat.
09/30/88
5.
8. Perlormina Oraanization Rept. No,
i
9. Perlormina O...anintion Name and Address
-l
10. Project/Task/Work Unit No.
-- -- ----
11. Contract(C) or Grant(G) No.
'-'
(C)
(G)
12. Sponsorina Organization Name and Address
U.S. Environmental protection
401 M street, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 2046D
--- ------------1
13. Type 0# Report & Period Covered i
;
Agency
800/000
14.
15. Supplementary Notes
15. Abstract (limit: 200 words)
The Klmberton site is located in the northeastern portion of Chester County,
pennsylvania, near the Philadelphia metropolitan area. The .site encompasses the Monsey
Products ~ompany property .and adjacent properties within the surrounding Village of
Kimberton. Several buried ,lagoons are located on the site. The lagoons ~re in close
proximity to numerous private water supply wells and less than one mile from French
Creek~ which is used for public recreation and fishing. The site had two successive
wners before Monsey products purchased it in 1968. All owners we,re involved in
industrial production. One owner, ciba Products company, a predecessor of CIBA-GEIGY,
operated eight lagoons at the site during its period of Qwnership from 1947 to 1959.
The lagoons received various residues from the manufacturing operations at the time. In
August 1981, VOCs were first detected during routine water quality testing of a private
well on Monsey property. EPA's subsequent investigation in early 1982 indicated that
soil, ground water, and surface water were contaminated by VOCs, including DCE, TCE and
vinyl chloride. The lagoons were identified as a source of contamination, and
subsequently, approximately 2,050 yd3 of con~aminated soil from three former lagoon
areas were excavated and disposed of offsite in September 1984 as part of a site
remedial action plan. The excavations were backfilled, regraded, and revegetated.
(See Attached Sheet)
17.RtPcffl'5't M..'~~c f-sq,~Ptors
Kimberton, PA
First Remedial Action
. contaminated Media: gw
Key contaminants: VOCs
. .
(DCE, TCE, vinyl chloride)
b. Identlfiers/Open.Ended Terms
I COSATI Field/Group
.
.vailability Statement
19. Security Class (This Report)
None
21. No. 0# Pages
83
-------
20. Security Class (This Page)
,None
22. Price
(See ANSI-Z39.18)
See Instructions on Reve".
OPTIONAL fORM 272 (4-771
(Former'y NTI>3S)
Department 0# Commerce
-------
\,:
EPA/ROD/R03-88/06~ '.:,1''-
Pirnberton, PA -' .}:~,
irst Remedial Action~
16. ABSTRACT (contidued)
Furthermore, in ;ece~ber 198.., CIBA-GEIGY and Monsey Products provided 25 residential
and commerical locations with an alternate source of drinking and c9ntact water.
Currently, sampling and analysis has or currenny is being performed in other lagoon
areas to evaluate their potential as sources of ground water contamination. This
remedial action was designed to address the health risk to those residents who may
continue to use ,contaminated private wells. A subsequent ROD will address other sources
of contamination as well as additional ground water remediation. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the ground water are VOCs including DCE, TCE and vinyl
chloride.
The selected remedial action for this site includes: continued provision of an
alternate 'water supply -- either by treating impacted residential and commerical wells
by filtration using granular activated carbon adsorption or by providing below-grade
storage tanks for all water needs (contact and drinking use); and continued monitoring
of impacted wells. The estimated present worth cost for this remedial action is
$3,850,000 with estimated annual O&~ costs of $250,000 to $300,000. ,
'"
-------
DECLARATION FOR THE RECORD OF DECISION
SITE NAME AND LOCATION
KUnberton Superfund Site
Village of KUnberton, Cheste~ County, Pennsylvania
Statement of Purpose
This decision docunent presents the selected renedial action for
the Kiml:erton Superfund 5i te (Site) developed in accordance with the
Canprehensive Envirormemtal Response, Canpensation and Liability Act of
1980, as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of
1986 (CERa.A) , 42 U. S.C. Section 9601 et seq., and to the extent
practicable, the National Contingency Plan (NCP) , 40 C.F.R. Part 300.
Statement of Basis
This decision is based upon and doc1..1l'rented in the contents of the
Administrati ve Record. '!he attached index identifies the i terns which
canprise the Administrative Record. The Cannonwealth of Pennsylvania has
reviewed, commented and concurred on this Record of Decision.
Description of the Selected Remedy
The ranedial alternative presented in this docunent is the first
'operable unit of a permanent remedy for the Kimberton Site. It will
provide a reliable interim solution for the prevention of health risks
to area ~e~~dents associated' with exposure to contaminated groundwater.
The alternative selected requires conbinued monitoring and treatrrent
of contaminated wells on an individual basis. Treatment will consist of
fil tration utilizing granular activated carbon adsorption. Potentially
threatened wells will also continue to be monitored and provided treatment
if appropriate. The contaminant plUltE and source or sources of contamina-
tion will be addressed in a subsequent Record of Decision.
Declaration
The selected ranedy is protective of human health and envirorrrent,
attains Federal and State requirements that are applicable or relevant
and appropriate, and is cost-effective as set forth in Section 121(d) of
CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. Section 9621 (d) . This remedy satisfies the statutory
prefereoces as, set forth in Section 121 (b) of CERaA, 42 U. s.C. Section
9621 (b), for ranedies that employ treatment that reduce toxici ty, mobility
or volume as a priocipal element. Finally, it is detemined that this
remedy utilizes permanent solutions and alternative treabment technologies
to the maximum extent practicable.
This is an interim remedy and will be reevaluated ooce the full
extent of the groundwater contamination has been defined and the source
remediation alternatives have been evaluated.
~ 6~ //- //.
-=:-->-./2 ~~~---
~t:anley L. skowski (3RA00)
Acting Regional Administrator
9-3~-g~
Date
-------
SECTION
III.
VII.
VIII.
XII.
XIII.
Table of Contents
for
Decision Summary
PAGE
I.
INTRODUCTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . .
..1
. . . . . .
II.
SITE NAME, LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION..............................1
SITE HISTORY................ .... ....
. . .. 2
. ... .
. .. .. .. .. ~ .. ..
IV.
ENFORCEMrnT
HIS WRY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~'. . ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
V.
SITE CHARACTERISTICS...................
..... . . .3
. .......'.
A.
B.
C.
GEOLOGY/HYDROLOGY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i':' . . . . . . . . .3
EXTENT OF CONTAMITNATION....... """"""'" . ......7
SU~ OF SITE RISKS............................ '. . . . . . . . . . . .9
VI.
Q)t-MJNITY RELATIONS HISTORY.. .. .. .... . .... ...... . ...... 12
REMEDIAL ALTERNATrvE OBJECTIVES.................................12
DESCRIPTION OF REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES... ...... ...... .............12
IX.
DESCRIPTI~
. ..
OF ARARs........................................... .14
x.
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES................. .... ~ ....15
XI.
DOCUMENTATION OF SIGNIFICANT CHANGES............................16
SELECTED REMEDIAL ALTERNATrvE.............. ~;......... ....... .16
A.
B.
C.
EVAWATION CRITERIA......................................... .16
DETERMINATION OF PREFERRED REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVE. ...... . . 17
STATEMENT OF FINDINGS REGARDING WETLANDS'
~ FLOODPIAINS.................... .'. .. . . . . . . . .. .......
.....17
STA'IDTORY DETERMINATIONS....................................... .18
APPENDIX A. - SUr+1ARY OF ANALYTICAL DATA
APPENDIX B. - RESPONSIVENESS SUMMARY
-------
I.
Introduction
The Village of Kimberton is located in the northeastern portion of
Chester County, Pennsylvania near the Philadelphia metropolitan area
(Figure 1). Numerous danestic and ccmrercial potable well water supplies
have been sempled by the Chester County Health Department aoo analyzed by
the Pennsylvania Depart:rrent' of Ehvirormental Resources (PADER) sioce
January 1982. High levels of chlorinated hydrocarbon chemicalcontamina-
tion has been detected in many of' the sempled wells. A source of this
contamination has been identified as the property currently owned by the
Monsey Corporation which contained several buried lagoons that were
operated by ~~e CIBA-GEIGY Corporation during the 1950's. This site was
evaluated through the Hazard Ranking System (HRS) and subsequently placed
on the, National Pr iod ties List (NPL), a list of hazardous waste sites
targeted for action under the Superfund program, in 1982.
Three of these lagoons have been excavated with contaminated soils
being removed off-site. The lagoons are in close proximity to numerous
private water supply wells and less than one mile from French Creek which
is used for publiC; recreation and fishing. ClBA-GEIGY sempled 67
residential and commercial establishments in August 1, 1985 and found in
sare of these wells various coocentrations of trichloroethylene (TCE),
1,2-dichloroethylene (DCE) and vinyl chloride (VC) which are all consider-
ed hazardous substaoces according to the Comprehensive Envirornental
Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERC!.A). ClBA-GEIGY and Monsey
signed a Consent Order and Agreanent wi tl1 PADER to provide certain
residential and catll'lercial locations with an alternative source o'f drinking
and contact water in December 1986. Ciba Geigy aOO Monsey, in addition,
continue to monitor these and other designated' locations periodically
according to prescribed scmpling and analytical procedures outlined uooer
the terms of the Consent Order. This is a PRPfunded, State-lead
enforcement Site.
II.
Site Name, Location, and Description
The Kimberton Site (Figure 2) encompasses the Monsey Products
Company property, and adjacent properties within the surrounding village
of KL'11berton and the area-wide groundwater contamination. The Monsey
Products Company property is located wi thin the northeast section of
Chester County, on the U.S.G.S. phoenixville 7.5 minute quadrangle at
approximately 75 Degree 34' 30" longitude 40 Degree 071 3" latitude. '!be
Si te is geographically located wi thin the eastern portion of a triangle
formed by PA Route 113 (to the South), Coldstreem Road (to the east) and,
Hares Hill Road (to the north and ~st). '!be town of Kimberton is
centrally located at the cross roads of Hares Hill Road and Old Kimberton
Road, less than 0.2 miles from the MonseyProducts Canpany 'property.
Local physiography is characterized by rolling countryside
generally canprised of small hills and valleys. Site area surface' water
drains toward Freoch Creek, which generally flows from west to east
approximately ~.75 miles to the north of the site. '!be ultimate regional
-------
FIGURE I
SITE LOCATION
MONSEY/CIBA-GE1GY
KiMBERTON.PA.
SOURCE: USGS MALVERN ANO
PHOENIXVILLE.PA. QUADS
i500
PEET
GROUNDWATER
TECHNOLOGY
Figure 1
-------
TtraERM Group.
Scale in Feet
1000 2000
H
_
"""^ "** Approximate Area of Investigation
/fTTTTT} Approximate Boundary of
///////i Ki
mberton NPL Site
Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Quadrangles,
Phoenixvilto and Marvem, PA
Figure 2
-------
- 2 -
drainage basin, of which French Creek is a tributary, is the Schuylkill
River located approximately 3.5 miles to the northeast.'
The Kimberton site is underlain by graphi ti,c gneiss to the southwest
and clastic sedlinentary rocks (shales. sandstones, and siltstones) to the
northeast.
Local hydrogeology primarily consists of a water table aquifer
discharging into local surface streams at topographic lows through a
-- systen of spri~s and seeps. The groundwater mov~nt through deeper,
bedrock zones appears to occur primarily through secondary porosity
(fractures and bedding plane partings) .
III.
Site History
. The property known as the KUnberton site appears as parcel #194 on
the Chester County Tax map shown in Figure 3. The property is currently
owned by Monsey Products CcrnpanYJ Ioc. and was purchased by Monsey in .
1968 from Firmenich Incorporated.
The title search indicates that three canpanies have held title
to t.'1e property presently known as the Kimberton si te:
- Ciba Products Corporation
- Fir.menich Incorporated
- .Monsey Products' Canpany, Ioc.
Corporate research on these three cexnpanies indicates that they
are all involved in industrial production. Ciba Products Corporation
(now CIBA-GEIGY Corporation) produces pharmaceuticals, contact lenses,
herbicides and fungicides, arxl seeds. Firmenich Incorporated is involved
in the production of chemicals and synthetic perfumes an Monsey Products
Company, Inc. produces asphalt, coal tar roofing, dr i veway sealer aoo
autcrnotive undercoatings.
During the period of site ownership by a predecessor of CIBA-GEIGY
(Ciba Products Company) from 1947 to 1959,' a series of eight lagoons were
operated on site. TheSe lagoons, which received various residues frcrn
the manufacturing operations at that time, were ultimately abandoned and
cl'osed. Several of these lagoons were subsequently backfilled or other-
wise I:egraded.
Volatile ol:ganic ccrnpounds were first detected in the groundwater
at Kimberton during routine water quality testing of a pl:ivate well on
the r-t:>nsey property by Chester County Health Department (
-------
The ERH Group.
Monitoring Well Location Map
XX
Monsey Property Boundary
Vv
NOTE.
Weils 1 thnj 4 • Existing Monsey Weils
5 thru 17 - Grounowaier T«cnnotogy |GT) installed Weils (Apr. 1985)
O 18 tnru 21 & 23 inru 26 • GT Installed Weils (Sect 1985)
Scale in F««t
Figure acapiea from Groundwatw Tecfinotoqy. Inc.
Figure 3
LEGEND
• Monitoring Well
0 ISO 300 500
N
-------
- 3
In response to the reported groundwater contamination in the
Borough of Kimberton, EPA conducted a field investigation of local ground-
water, surface water, and soil contattination in the Spring of 1982. This
investigation reported the presence of organic chemicals, including
trichloroethylene (TCE) and trans-l,2-dichloroethylene (CCE), in local
groundwater, surface water, aIx:1 sOllssampled at or near the site. As a
result of the field investigation team's (FIT) report of 23 July 1982,
the Monsey site was placed on the NPL by the EPA.
Investigations conducted by CIBA-GEIGY and Monsey since the initial
detection of organic compounds in water and soil samples have indicated a
gradual release of volatile organic compounds through the subsurface to
the local ground water table. These campoundsgradually migrate with
local groundwater and discharge to surface waters 1 to the north and east
in the Village of Kimber ton. Volatile organid: compounds have 1:Jeen
detected in a number of private weJ)s in an apparenti'downgradient direction
from the Monsey property. Limited, low level surfa'~e Water contamination
has also 1:Jeen detected. in local receptor strecrns.,,'
:1
IV.
Enforcement History
"
:!
, .
. I
',j
Past disposal practices involving hazardo~s i:taoces, which
occurred bet~n 1947 and 1959, have resulted in;'igrou, ter and soil
contamination at this site. In September 1986,,1 PADER which is the
enforcement lead for this site, sent ClEA-GEIGY and ,Monsey letters inform-
I
ing these companies that they were potentially responsible parties (PRPs)
and liable for the contamination at this site. In addition, these letters
sought their participation in the Remedial Investigation and Feasibility
Studies (RIlE'S) process. Both ccmpanies agreed to conduct an RI/FS at
this Site, to provide an alternate source of drinking and contact water
to those residential and ccmnercial locations whose water supply was
impacted by' the Site and to continue to monitor specified locations for
the identified contaminants by entering into-Consent Order and Agreements
with PADER in 1986 and 1987.
V.
site Characteristics
A.
Geology/Hydrogeology
1.
Si te Geology
. Locally, in Kimberton, two predominant fomations exist: A
gr'aphi tic gneiss which is a metamorphic rock of Precambrian age described
as a medium grained gneiss and schist characterized by the presence of
graphite. The other, the Stockton Formation, is a sedimentary unit of
T1:iassic age and consists of locally of grey 'and red siltstones, red
shales, fine to medium g:r:ey and reddish grey sandstones and arkosic
sandstones (Figure 4). The shales and siltstones are sanetimes thinly
interbedded with impure carbonate rock. The contact zone be~n the
graphi tic gneiss and the Stockton Foz:mation lies to the northeast of
Coldstream Road and in an approximate WNW to ESE orientation. It is, for
the most part, ill-defined and has been mapped using drilling logs of the
site monitoring wells. As detez:mined through drilling of the monitoring
wells, the graphitic gneiss has undergone significant mechanical and
. chemical breakdown (weathering).
. 0
-------
TtwERM Group.
Site Geology
STOCKTON FORMATION
GRAPHITIC GNEISS
Scale in Feet
0 ISO 300 - 500
N
TRS • Stockton Formation (Clastic Sedimentary Rock)
gg - Graphitic Gneisa "~"
:':•:•: UnconformaWe Contact Zone
Figure 4
-------
- 4
These processes have worked progressively downward fran the surface
generally creating an upper unconsolidated weatl:1ered zone of decanposed
rock and soil which grades vertically into a crumbly.. gravel-like
material where pieces of sand to boulder-size rocks remain in place in a
clayey matrix. . The weathered' zone was, found to be betY.een 50 feet and 75
-- feet in thickness except in one area where it was only 30 feet thick.
Groundwater was noted to occur almost exclusively within the weathered
portion of the graphitic gneiss (locally on the Monsey Products CanpaEY
~operq). '
'iEathering within the stockton Formation was far less severe with
the ~athered layer generally ranging in thickness fran 5 feet to 15 feet
(Figure 5) .
2.
Hydrogeology
The hydrogeology of' the Kimberton area is typical of the
Chester County region as a whole. Water levels fluctuate in response to
seasonal precipitation and evaporotranspirational trends. The water
table closely mimics topography wi th the dcrninant recharge areas lying
in the higher elevations and discharge zones noted through local springs
and streams at low elevations.
wi t.'1in the area of coocernJ water table conditions exist
wi thin two contrasting (Ii thogically derived) water-bearing units: The
metamorphic graphi tic gneiss (encanpassing the Monsey Products Canpany
,prope,rty) and the Stockton Formation (canprising the downtown Kimberton
area and surrounding properties). As discussed previously! the graphi tic
gneiss is highly weathered to a median depth of 50 feet to 75 feet. The
uoconsolldated upper part of the graphitic gneiss generally has moderate
to low permeability, but contains a considerable amount of water in
storage. Below the uoconsolidated zone the rock is generally solid;
however, sane minerals are heavily weathered, particularly along fractures.
Permeabili ty and storage capacity of the solid fractured rock generally.,
decrease with depth as the degree of weathering decreases. The highest
per.neabil i ty. probably occurs where the uoconsol idated and solid rock
merge. In this transi tional area, openings in rock are formed or enlarged
by the weathering process. St.orage capacity, h~ver, is low because the
rock has limlted porosity.
c:;roundwater movement through the gneiss will tend to
migrate in response to elevational changes in the water table (Figure 6).
The subsurface zone of primary movement is noted wi thin the highly
weathered and fractured upper portion of the gneiss. Ceeper water-bearing
zones are reported to occur at fracture traces (daninantly vertical to
subvertical in profile), and generally receive recharge via vertical
infil tration fran the overlying horizons. Local. well yields wi thin the
graphi tic gneiss range fran 4 - 25 gpn in wells which draw water from the
If.eathered zone, with over 200 gpn reported in several of the deeper wells
(existing Monsey If.ells * 1-4) which may penetrate deeper fractures wi thin
the bedrock gneiss. .
, "
-------
LOCATION OF GEOLOGIC PROFILES
A-8, C-D, A'-O
CHOUMOWATU
TECMMOV.OCV
Figure 5
-------
SOUTH- SOUTHWEST
C
MO
NORTH-NORTHEAST
D
13
H-
OQ
n
m
Ul
n
o
a
n
a.
150
1111
HONIIONTAL SOtLt
GEOLOGIC PROFILE
SECTION C-D
Stockton formation: Conalata locally of grey and red
atltatonea .nd red ahale; fine to medium
grained grey and redish-gray ••ndatonea mnii
• rkocic unditonei. Shales and •iltttonea
•re •oKetioei thinly interbedded xith
mpure carbonate rock.
Hetaaorphic Cneiaa: Ooiiinantly quarti and feldapar xllh varying
aaounta at «.fic» and graphite: eihibit*
lane* of prcftrenlimI weathering.
vt MATC*. LCVtUtoiMi) Jo tin naj
J52] HICHLY *f «'«t«'0 MtTAUOftPMIC •NCI1I
r > jt
' WtATHCWO MtTAMOttrHC tNCIll
uiHitcmmic MOHOCK »«iu
HO11 VIDTKAL SCALI IS FlVf
TlMf J HONIIONTM. JC»Lt
STOCKTON
WtMHCRCO IOM( IIOCKTON rORUATIOM
CKOUNDWATEM
TEOINOtOCV
-------
NORTH-NORTHWEST
A1
ISO-i
H-
OQ
H
n>
n
o
a
NORTH-NORTHEAST
GEOLOGIC PROFILE
SECTION A'-D
ISO
ricr
HMIIONTAL 1CALC
Slochlon for«ntion: roniitla loc*lly of grey ind red tiltslonrv
•nd red ihslei fine to Medium qrelncd qtty
end rtddi«h grey •inditanr* *nd arkoair
sandstones. Shales and ailtstones are
9o*eii«ra thinly interbedded Mith iwpurr
carbonate rock.
m. ««ita LtvtL d.it.O MMPT IMS
^£] 1IOCKTOH fOUUATION (UNCHffIHIMIKUD)
*" I
• '-• I *[*TMIREO IOHI STOCKTON fOMUItTION
MOTf ViKTICLt »C*H IS riVC
TIMCS HOUIIONTAL IC«Lt
CMOUNDWATCH
TECHNOLOGV
-------
NORTH-NORTHWEST
SOUTH- SOUTHEAST
B
00
c
m
Ul
o
o
MONSEY PWOOUCTS
BUILDING
too
GEOLOGIC PROFILE
SECTION A-B
Stockton foroitlon: Conniti locill|f of grey »nd red
•tltatonet and red vhalej fine to Mediu*
Qreintd qrey end reddlth*qr«y ••ntfitonea and
irkoiic lenditone*. Shalei and lillatonea
are io"tll«c« thinly interbedded Kith
Impure carbonate rock.
Hetaaorphic Cnaiaa: DoMlnantly quarti and feldapar Kith varying
aaounta of oafica and graphite) enhlbita
lone* of preferential "leathering.
w*itx LfvCLIi. f.nl X) Jtr'i»as
HMMLY WC*THCRCO UCrXMOArHK *N(lf 1
uojtLr WI*IHH«IO ucTMNwmic awtm
IMOIArNCIKO U(TAMOMPMC MOtlOCK OWIJJ
STOCKTON rOMUtriON (UNOIf fFHtHII*TCO|
WE«rH(D(D IONC STOCKTOH FO*MATION
HOTIiVfMTKAl. SUtt IS flVI
TIMCS HORIZONTAL SCALC
-------
WATER TABLE ELEVATION (in feet above sea level)
30 JULY 1986 .
GXOUNDVATBt
TBCMNOLOSV
Figure 6
-------
- 5 -
'!be &eper fracture zones have site specific significance
due to t.'1e potential for increased water transmission. Hydraulic comnunica-
tion wi thin upper weathered zones of the graphitic gneiss is 1 ikely.
ASsociated groundwater gradient/movement is considered to be directionally
controlled through water gradient elevational changes (as observed wi thin
monitoring wells and inferred through regional interpretations of ground-
water moverrent). Specifically, groundwater moverrent locally within the
graphi tic gneiss am suspect fracture zones are regionally interpreted in
a north-north easterly direction fran the Monsey property and downtown
Kirnberton area, toward French Creek.
The Stockton Formation generally consists of interJ:edded '"
samstones, siltstones, and shales. The inter bedding and fracturing has
caused extremely anisotropic and heterogeneous hydraulic characteristics
associated wi th this formation. Groundwater is largely tranSl'li tted :dong
J:edding planes, fractures and joints. Water withdrawal rates noted for
wells locally penetrating the Stockton have yielded l:etween 2 and 20 gpn,
depending upon the nature, location and depth ,of 'M:lls.
a.
Groundwater Movanent
Groundwater elevations of both on-site (Monsey Products
Canpany property) and off-si te moni tor ing 'M:lls 'M:re measured fran the
top of secure casings using electrical water level detectors (Figure 7).
Field surveys were performed to accurately determine the horizontal
coordinates and vertical elevations (tied into U.S.G.S. bench mark datum
located in downtown Ki~rton) of well casings. ' Respective field, data
transposed onto prepared base maps provided a basis for the following
interpretive c01:relations relative to groundwater movement within the
Monsey Products Canpany p'roperty and 'adjacent Kirnberton area:
- 'Ibe occurance of groundwater is under water table condi-
tions at depths ranging fran approximately 2 feet to 50 feet below land
surface.
water table elevations mirnica subdued version of surface
topography; increased groundwater elevations correlating to areas of
high topographic elevations such as ridges and knolls; reduced groundwater
elevations occurring daninantly in topographic' low areas characterized by
streans, creeks, and/or springs.
- Local groundwater recharge of significance to the MJnsey
property and adjacent Kimberton area occurs from both vertical infiltra-
tion onto related surface areas and directionally fran adjacent topographic
high areas; daninantly from the south of route 113, fran the north of
Hares Hill Road, and fran the east of downtown Kimberton (up topographic
gradient from the easterly direction of, the unnamed creek/marsh area).
-------
Th«ERM Group.
Additional Test Well Locations
Scale in Feet
N
0 t50 300 500
NOTE
Wetis 1 mru 4 - Existing Mousey Wetts
5 tnru 17 • G/oonowarer Technology (GT) insa««a Wefts (Apr '985)
IS mru 21 & 23 tnru 26 • GT InsiaMd W«t» (S»». 1985)
27 • GT Insulted Moratonng We« (Jan 24. 1966)
28. 29 - GT Proposed Monitoring Wed Locaoon
30.31.32 • GT Proposed O«o Momtonng Wen Lxxaocjn
Figure adaoted from GroundwaHr Tecfmotogy. me
LEGEND
•Existing Monitoring W
A Additional Test Well
t
Figure 7
-------
r-, -
- 6 -
- ~oundwater discharge locally occurs through surface
springs, seeps, and creeks to small streams located within local
topographic lows. One such discharge area is located adjacent to the
northwest boundary of Monsey's property as an unnaned creek flowing to
. the northeast through the center of Kimberton (Stream "A"; Figure 8).
Another such discharge area exists to the northeast of Monsey property as
a minor unnamed creek flowing. to the northwest and eventually converging
wi th Stream "A" (Stream "B"; Figure' 8) . . A third local groundwater
discharge occurs to the southeast of Monsey property, again as an unnamed
minor creek in this case flowing generally southeast from the site area
(Strecm "C"; Figure 8). .
.- Groundwater gradient and ground water flow are
directionally controlled in response to elevational changes in the 'Hater
table. Under natural, non-pumping condi tions, the predaninant ground
water gradient fran the Monsey property ranges directionally from the
northwest clockwise through the southeast, toward the above noted ground
water discharge zones.
- PhysiocheTIical parameters rreasured fran area monitoring
wells as baseline water quality characteristics (pH, TDS, and chloride)
appear to fall wi thin background ranges.
b.
Surface Water
.
, )
The local surface waters can be divided into three
unnamed strecms (Figure 8) emanating wi thin and/or flowing througn the
central Kimberton area. For clarity, the streans have been designated as
follows:
-' Stream A: A small, permanent stream (the pr imary stream
in the center of Kimber ton) flowing generally south to north adjacent to
the northwestern boundary of Monsey property. This stream is primarily
spring fed west of the site from sources at - and upstream of the
gneiss/clastic contact zone. Estlinated average stream flow in this area
ranges seasonally fran 0.5 to 4 cubic feet per second (cfs). A
significant iocrease in stream volume occurs upon its confluence wi th the
outfall fran Gotwals Pooos. Estimated flow downstream of this confluence
ranges fran 8 to 12 cfs. . .
- Stream B: An apparent minor intemti ttent stream which
appears to originate from a spring proximal to the 1950 location of the
Kimberton town dump. The temtinus of this strean is not visible on aerial
photograpbs but it is believed to become confluent wi th Stream A.
Estlinated flow down the headwaters is 0.1 to 0~5 cfs. Downstream
flow has not been observed, but is not anticipated to be significant.
- Stream C: A tributary- of French Creek which flows south
of t.~e intersection of Route 113 and Cold Stream Road. This strean
derives a major volume of its flow from topographically high areas to the
south of the study area. Strean flow appears to be intermi ttant upstrean
of Cold Strean Road. However, a significant iocrease in strean flow
results from. a major spring located roughly 300 feet downstream of Cold
Strecm Road with flows estlinated at 0.5 to 2 cfs.
-"
-------
- 7 -
B.
Extent of Contamination
1.
Drum Removal
In'mid 1982, the PRPs supervised the excavation and removal
of fifty-seven 55-gallon drums from an abandoned, on-site septic system
formerly used to serve the plant's wastewater needs. These drums contained
offspecification asphaltic materials which had been used as partial back-
fill for the collapsed septic pit sometilne earlier~ The drum removal
program, conducted in conjunction with DER, consisted of removal of all
drums from the pit area, procurement of samples from five representative
drums for analysis, procurement of post-excavation soil samples for
analysis, and appraisal of possible relationship of groundwater
contamination to the drum burial.
The drum excavation, removal, and disposal program was
successfully canpleted in November 1982. Soil samples procured beneath
the excavation floor indicated no extensive migration of organic compounds
from 'the area.
The preliminary hydrogeologic assessment conducted by the
PRPs recommended' a more definitive off-site investigation of the ground-
water regime surrounding the site. This is currently being canpleted.
.
Lagoon Excavation
2.
As a result of soil sanpling conducted during preliminary
site assessment activities, three areas were identified within Monsey
property with relatively high levels of organic canpound contamination.
Study of available historic aerial photographs confirmed that the three
areas \oJere former treatment lagoons. These three areas, identified by
Groundwater Technologies, Inc. (GTI) as Lagoons 6, 7, and 9 were charac-
terized by materials of similar ,chemical canposition and physical appear-
ance (Figure 9).
Upon review of this information and at the request of PADER,
a progrCitl was. undertaken by the PRPs toexcavateJ remove, and dispose of
soils fran these three former lagoon areas as part of a site ranedial
action program. .
The excavation progrCitl was finalized during August and
early September 1984. Actual site excavation was initiated on September
17 and canpleted on Septanber 25. Site backfilling and restoration were
completed on October 8.
upon canpletion of the excavation program on September 25,
1984, a total of 143 truckloads of contaminated soil had been excavated
fran the site representing approximately 2,050.cubic yards of material.
All excavated materials were confirmed as received at the licensed TSD
facility operated by CEmS International, Ioc. in Niagara Falls, New York.
-------
Th« ERM Qftxjp.
CM
Site Area Stream Flow and Spring Locations
Stream A
Estimated Flow Rata
8-12 (cfs)
Estimated Flow Rata
0.1-0.5 (cfs)
Estimated Flow Rata
Fitzstmmons
/ HZ
Scale m Feet
0 150 300 500
Intermittent Stream
? Inferred Location of
Subsurface Conduit
• Spring Locations
• GT1 Sample Locations (1982)
A ERM Sample Locations (1985)
— '— Flow Direction -
Figure 8
-------
LABORATORY
(SHOWER FACILITIES)
BACKFILL MATERIAL
BORROW AREA
TEMPORARY SITE
TRAILER
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
•i I INTERPRETATION AND
FIELD SURVEY VERIFIED
I 1 LAGOON LOCATION
RESTROOM FACILITY
CLEAN-UP AREA
EXCAVATED AREA
EXCAVATED LAGOON AREAS,
SEPTEMBER 1984
GROUNDWATER
TECHNOLOGY
Figure 9
-------
. -. .
- 8 -
Excavation limits v.ere determined in the field by visual
assessment and through photoionizer measurements procured along the base
and sides of each excavation. Upon canpletion of the excavation program,
representati ve soil samples v.ere obtained fran pi t floors and walls in
the presence of PADER or EPA and sample splits were provided to PADER for
analysis. Subsequent to this process, marker. horizons t-.1ere placed in
each excavation and backfilling was initiated. Site backfilling and
restOI:ation were initiated on. September 26 and completed on October 8
with ~'e application of vegetative cover material.
The canbinabon of visual assessment, low-level recorded
photoionizer readings, and analytical resul ts of post-excavation soil
samples all indicate the lagoon excavation remedial action program was
successful. in removing potential source materials of ground water
contamination from the current Monsey site. Data obtained during and
subsequent to the excavation program indicate a minimum of 95 percent
reduction in total volatile organic canpound concentration in these
forrrer lagoons. . ..
CUrrently, sampling and analysis has/is being performed in
.
. other lagoon areas identified on the Monsey property. J1
3., Groundwater Contamination 1
Monitoring wells
a.
During the period fran April through Septemter 1985, a
total of 21 monitor i09 !Nells v.ere installed in Kimterton wi thin and in
the primarily downgradient direction fran the general area of current
Monsey property (Figure 7). '!he well installation program was designed
to provide' defini bon of local hydrogeology in relation to contaminant
movement in the area.
This groundwater monitoring program included the design
and supervision of monitoring well installation. Local permits and,
where applicable, third""party pemission were obtained prior to. well
installation. Pr9per well installation specifications and decontamination
procedures were established and revie
-------
TOTAL VOLATILES ISOCONCENTRATION ( PPb )
23-26 JUNE -1986
GHOUNDWATEH
TECHNOU3CY
-------
o.
- 9 -
Additio~l groundwater monitoring wells were installed between
February and July 1988 during the Supplemental Remedial Investigation to
further define the contaminant plume migration (Figure 7) .
.b.
Residential and Private wells
In August 1985, a program of residential and private
well sampling in the central Kimberton area was initiated. Results of
this initial sampling program indicated the presence of volatile organic
compounds, prlinarily trichloroethylene (TCE), dichloroethylene
(OCE), and vinyl chloride (VC) , within the water supply of a number of
local residences and commercial establishments. As a result of this
sampling program, alternative water supplies have been provided to a
total of 25 locations within the Borough of Klmberton. CUrrently 23
locations receive alternative water supplies (Figure 11) ~
The collection of data through the ongoing sampling
program has and continues to provide useful information on groundwater
plume definition and migration pattern.
4.
Surface Water Contamination
Surface water quality investigations have been conducted,on
Stream A south of Klmberton Road by Ecology and Envirorment, Inc. in
April 1982 (as part of EPA I s FIT study) and. by GTI as part of the .
preliminary site, investigation conducted late that same year. Analytical
data fran stream sanples procured during these studies revealed the
presence of low levels of VOCs downstream of the Cold Stream Road bridge.
These resul ts, together with analyses fran samples of springs taken by
GTI linnediately north of the bridge, indicated that VOCs may be entering
the stream primarily fran spring discharges. .
Stream A sampling conducted by ERM in eecember 1985, in the
downstream direction to a point bnmediately beyond the confluence of
Stream A with effluent fran Gotwals Pond, confirmed the presence of VOCs
within the stream but with somewhat different distribution. The current
stream sampling program is concerned with defining the source(s) of'VOCs
in Stream A as well as delineating distribution of VOC canponents. Similar
sampling and analysis will be undertaken for Streams B and C which have
not been the subject of quantitative investigation to date. The surface
water study is designed to characterize surface water flow wi thin the
study area to better def ine preferred zones of ground water di scharge and
contaminant movanent.
C.
~y of Site Risks
Trichloroethylene, dichloroethylene,. and vinyl chloride are
considered the main contaminants of concern at this site. Acute inhalation
exposure to TCE causes central nervous system depression. TCE is classified
as a probable human carcinogen. Vinyl chloride is classified as a human
car inogen.
"
\.
. ~
. 'J(' .
. !
I)
/ .
/,
}
-------
Kiirfcerton Rd
TOTAL VOCs (ppb)
(April, 1988 Data)
Q ND
S 1-10
1L. - 100
B 101 - 1000
10QH- " . '
KIMBERTON, PA
Figure 11
-------
- HJ -
Potential exposure pathways to humans from the use of
contaminated groundwater include:
ingestion of ground water
- inhalation of volatile chemicals released during water use
direct dermal contact with contaminated water
Persons at risk of exposure to the contaminants in groundwater
include those who have and use contaminated or threatened private wells.
Tables 2 and 3 were developed after a review of the elBA-GEIGY residential
well .sampling results of August 1985 near the KLmberton Site. Of the
twelve volatiles assayed, three are of toxicological conc~rn:
TCE
OCE
VC
trichloroethylene
dichloroethylene .
vinyl chloride (chloroethylene).
These three chlorinated ethylenes have carcinogenic potencies
which vary over three orders of magnitude:
-6 . (ppb) TCE equivalence
HJ arancer n sk
TCE ,t 2.7 1
OCE 0.033 82
ve 0.015 180
That is, molecule for molecule, ve is 180 times as potent in
cancer induction as '!'CE. Hence, 10 ppb contamination with ve is mote
carcinogenic than 1000 ppb contamination with TCE.-
In the following analysis, contamination by TCE, CCE a~ ve for
the most severely affected wells is expressed as multiples of 10
risks and added together for a ~tion of carcinogenic risk. Six
stations exceed a cumulative 10 multiple risk of 500 (i.e., individual
risk is over 5 per 10,000). Three additional stations have even higher
cumulative risks (0.1, 0.5 and 0.7 percent individual risks) (See
Table J).
In additional to these 9 stations with high cumulative risks,
there are several stations with marginal risk (See Table ~.
'-"
o
-~
~~. ..
-------
.
~\.
. \;
- 11 -t-.
. /;
Table .tl
RISK ASSESSMENT OF HIGHLY CONT~INATED WELLS (KIMBERTON)
. - J
Name TCE* OCE VC TOTAL** Individual
Risk
Rev. Munz 182 182
C. Amidon 230 333 563
E. Blank 259 485 267 1011 0.1%
'c. R. Davis 248 424 672
D. Doran 226 5.45 771
J. Effgen 215 455 670
Altemose 107 242 349
P. K. ~ry 667 1273 4933 6873 0.7%
D. Ku1p 1041 606 3333 4980 0.5%
M. Ludwick 256 364 6UJ (tefore GAC)
Moore/Yeager 222 515 737
. H. E. Pifer 285 285
C.' Wilson 48 91 139
T. pfau 121 121
. 6
* Values expressed as multiple of 10- (heoce; cancers per million) .
** CUmulative cancers per million lifetime consumers of respective water.
. -4
All of the above .\aiells represent greater than 10 risk and must te
avoided intnediately for drinking and bathing. In addition, suspension of
water for_~ther domestic use in the three cases where individual risk
exceed 10 (0.1%) would te recattnended.
Table 2...
RISK ASSESSMENT OF rmERATELY CONTAMINATED WELLS
Nane TCE OCE VC TOTAL
G. Epps 91 91
C. Fish~r 61 61
K. Phillips 5 61 66
E. Rittenbaugh 61 61
D. Sands 91 91
-------
- 12 -
VI.
community Relations History
The main carmuni ty coocerns for the affected residents and
businesses revolve around the issues of:
l.
2.
3.
Groundwater contamination on and off-site
Quali ty of alternate water supplies
Desire of affected residents to remain on private
wells .
Remedial Alternative Objectives
VII.
The major objective of the remedial action taken at the K1mberton
site i? to provide a safe drinking and contact water source to those
i.rnpacted by the groundwater contamination. Based on this objective
various mitigation and source control technologies were.screened to
provide a limited number of technologies applicable to remedial action at
the site. 'I'l1t: criteria used in this decision making process are the
nine evaluation criteria as specified in Section 121 of SARA.
VI II .
Description of the Alternatives
Summary of Remedial Alternatives
The Center for Disease Control (CDC) has previously reviewed the
initial sampling data collected by CIBA-GEIGY in August.l985 which
included 67 residential and commercial establishments. CDC at that time
certified 12 wells as being unfit for human consumption and also supported
alternative water 'supplies and additional monitoring which had already been
initiated by PADER. The Supplemental Remedial Investigation is continuing
to fully identify the contaminant source(s) as well as the full extent of
groundwater contamination. The findings of this Supplemental Remedial
Investigation will be addressed in a subsequent Proposed Remedial Action
Plan.
Three alternatives were specifically developed to address the
health risk to those residents Who may continue-to utilize contaminated
private wells. These alternatives were identified and evaluated according
to specific criteria required by CERCLA.
No Action
The NCP requires that the no-action alternative (i.e. no treatment)
be considered to provide a worse case basis for ccmparison with other
al ternatives. To not continue the current treatment progrcm would not be
protecti ve of human health in the short and long-term. The public health
problem would continue into the foreseeable future.
Ai ternati ve 1:
No Further Action
Under this alternative, residential and commercial establishments
having contaminated wells would continue to receive treatment on an
individual basis by filtration utilizing granular activated carbon
adsorption. Two additional commercial establishments would continue to
receive alternate water in 1iIelow grade storage tanks. A groundwater
monitoring program would a~ continue which allows periodic reassessment
-------
- 13 -
of the extent of contamination and the concentrations of hazardous
substaoces contained in the groundwater. Both treatrtent and moni tor ing
are being performed by ClBA-GEIGY and Monsey in accordance with a Consent
Order with PADER. Based upon a review of current volatile organic chanical
analytical data, this technolOgy has served to reduce to below detectable
levels the hazardous substances found in the groundwater obtained fram
contaminated wells.
- Estlinated Annual costs: $250,000 - 300,000.
- Estimated ]rnplementation timeframe: 2-30 years
- Present Worth: $3,850,000,
A human health evaluation was performed and it was determined that
in several instances trichloroethylene, dichloroethylene and vinyl chloride
exceeded acceptable concentration levels at the contaminated wells prior.
to treatment. Human exposure to these contaminants in groundwater may
lead to adverse health effects. Following treatrrent, the 'Nater falls
within acceptable levels for all 3 contaminants. Therefore, this
alternative is appropriate because it would be protective of human health.
This is an interbn remedy and will be reevaluated once the full extent of
the groundwater contamination has been defined and the source remediation
alternatives have been evaluated. A range of two to thirty years has
been est1mated as the'length of time that residents and commercial
establishments will need to use an alternate water source for costing
purposes.
, ,
I '
Al ternati ve 2:
Temporary Drinking Water
,
I.
The use of a temporary drinking water source for potable water
(i.e. bottled water) is a potential alternative to be i~planented until
such time that a permanent al ternati ve water supply can be provided for
the residents and commercial establishments or the contaminant plume has
. been remediated. A range of two to thirty' years has been estimated as
the length of time that residents and commercial establishments will need
to use an alternate drinking water sources for costing purposes.
Bot~ed water can be suppl ied through del i very to each of the 23
affected locations. '!he average daily demand for each residence was
established for drinking am cooking purpose only. Temporary supply to
meet all danestic water needs is bnpractical since a majority of bottled-
water vendors supply five or six gallon storage containers mounted on a free-
standing dispenser (bulk storage and dispensing facilities for purchased
water would be required to provide alternate contact water for each
residence). Therefore, under Alternative 2, all other domestic water
needs (Le. sanitary, bathing, washing, etc.) would continue to be met
through the existing contaminated well supplies.
The provision of a temporary water supply to meet drinking and
cooking needs would reduce health risks resulting from the ingestion of
contaninated well water. However, risks associated with airbor~ and
dermal exposure would continue. The magnitude of the health risk fram
inhalation and deDDal absorption is expected to be comparatively small
for a two-year linplementation period and would increase proportionately
-------
- 14 -
wi th increased exposure.
year s has been used.
For costing purposes the range of two to thirty
Estbnated Annual Costs:
Estimated Timeframe:
Present W<;>rth:
$130,000
. 2...30 years
$2,002,000
Alternative 3: Water Canpany Service Connections and Water-
Extension (Public Water Supply)
Both the Phoenixville System and Citizens Utility currently supply
.water to a portion of the residences in the Kimberton area.
Neither Company's existing water distribution systems currently
extend to the area in which the contaminated wells are located.. Address-
ing the problem of the contaminated residential ~lls by replacement wi th
a public water supply would require the extension of the water supply
service system (s) . .
The facilities to extend the wa~er system(s) include approximately
8,000 feet of water main and 23 service connections. The location of
water mains and appurtenances for the water service would be finalized
dur ing the design phase.
The linplementation of this alternative would necessitate
abandorrnent aoo sealing of the individual residential wells in accordance
with the PADER Standard Specifications for Sealing for Abaooooed wells.
Extension of the existing system is technically feasible and
linplernentable, however, same members of the community prefer to continue
using their own private wells containing the carbon filter systems. The
capital cost for expanding the water canpany system(s) is estlinated at
$1,300 ,000 . The phys ical expansi on of these f ac il i ties could be
linplernented in six to nine months. including design, approval, and
construction of the system. Six additional months are necessary for
administrative purposes, such as securing contracts.
Dnplementation of this alternative would canpletely eliminate risk
due to exposure to contaminated grouoo water of residents using the
contaminated groundwater for drinking and contact water. It is a viable
al ternative am represents a pennanent solution for providing a drinking
water source that meets all criteria for the protection of human health.
~ Estbnated Annual O&M costs:
- Estimated timeframe:
- Present Worth:
- 0 -
1-2 years
$1,300,000
IX.
A.
Description of Major ARARs
Federal
Safe Dr inking Water Act
- M:Ls
Clean Water Act
- Ambient Water Quality Criteria
: 4 . .~ ~
-------
. .
- 15 -
state
Pennsylvania Clean.
. Streams Law - Section 402
- Ambient Water Quality Standards
Pennsylvania Rules and
Regulations
Title 25 Chapter 93
B.
Addi t10nar Requirements for Protectiveness
The selected site. ranedy must consider and be consistant with the
following:
Federal Executive Order 11988,
Floodplain Management
40 C.F.R. Part 6, Appendix A
Action to avoid adverse
effects, minimize
potential harm, restore
and preserve natural and
beneficial value.
Federal Executive order 11990
Protection of Wetlands,
40.C.F.R. Part 6, Appendix A
Action to minimize
destruction, loss, or
degradation of wetlands.
Federal Clean water Act
Differential Ground-
water Policy Class IIA
aquifer.
New Jersey Coastal Plain
Sole Source Aquifer
Action to minimize adverse
aqui fer impacts
x.
Comparative Analysis
Alternative number l.includes the continued provision of an
alternate water supply (either by carbon filtration treabment or below
grade storage tank) for all water needs (contact and drinking uses) and
continued monitoring of those impactea wells. In addition, this
alternative is protective of human health, complies with the identified
ARARs, reduces toxicity, is implementable and provides the most cost.
effective solution for the short-teDn since the source of this contamina-
tion is to be ultimately remediated. This alternative has been accepted
by the State.
Alternative number 2. provides for continued use of contaminated
supplies, but includes the provision of an alternate drinking and cooking
water supply by bottled water and continued monitoring of those impacted
wells. These provisions would reduce health risks resulting from the
ingestion of contaminated well water, however, risks associated with
airborne and dermal exposure would continue. This alternative is
implenentable, but does not reduce the toxicity, mobility or volume of
contaminants, would be effective by eliminating ingestion exposure in the
short and 10ng-teDn and would comply with identified ARARs. HotNever,
both-the contact and inhalation exposures would remain so therefore, this
remedy would not be protective in either the short or long-term.
-------
"
- 16 -
Alternative number 3 requires the provision for a public water
supply as the alternate drinking and contact water source. This
alternative would be protective of human health, complies with sPecified
ARARs, is effective both long and short term, implementable and cost
effective. It does not, however, reduce the toxicity 1 mobility or volune
of the contaminants. In addition, further information needs to be
suppl ied by the Supplemental Remedial Investigation before the total
impact of this option can be assessed (i .e. area-wide developitent and
water needs and the impact of pumping and treating groundwater on-site on
tne~loCal- groundwater flow pattern) .
XI.
Documentation of Significant Changes
No significant changes to the preferred alternative presented in
the proposed plan have occured.
XII.
Selected Remedial Alternative
A.
Evaluation Criteria
Section 121 of SARA and the current version of the National
Contingency Plan (NCP) (50 Fed. Reg. 47912, November 20, 1985) establish a
variety of requirarents t;:ertaining to raredial actions under CERaA. The
following nine criteria were used in the evaluation of the remedial action
"al ternatives at Kimberton: '
- OVerall protection of human health and the environment
addresses whether or not a ranedy provides adequate protection and
describes how risks posed through each pathway are eliminated, reduced or
controlled through treatment, engineering controls, or institutional
controls.
- Compliance with ARARs addresses whether or not a'ranedy will
meet all of the applicable or relevant, and appropriate requirements of
other Federal and State environmental statutes and/or provides ground for
invoking a waiver.
- Long-term effectiveness and t;:ermanence refers to the abil i ty
of a remedy to maintain reliable protection of human health and the
envirot'1Ilental over time ooce cleanup goals have been met.
- Reduction of toxici ty, mobili ty or volume is' the anticipated
- performan::e -of the treatment technologies a raredy may anploy.
- Short-term effectiveness addresses the period of tbDe needed
to achieve protecti on, and any adverse impacts on human heal th and the
environment that may be posed during the 'construction and implementation
period until cleanup goals are achieved.
, - rmplanentabili ty is the technical am administrative
feasibility. of a raredy, iocluding the availability of materials and
services needed to implement a particular option.
-------
- 17 -
- Cost includes estimated capital and operation and maintenance
costs and net present worth costs.
- State Acceptance indicates whether, based on its review of
RI/FS and Proposed plan, the State concurs on, opposes, or has no comment
on the preferred alternative at the present ttrne.
- Carmuni ty Acceptance wi 11 be assessed in the Record of
Decision following a review of the public ccr.ments received on the
Administrative Record and Proposed Plan.
B.
Determination of Preferred Remedial Alternative
The preferred alternative is alternative number 1. This
alternative selects continued .use of individual well treatment by
granular activated carbon adsorption--as required by PADER's 1986 Consent
Order wi th the PRPs.
The preferred alternative provides complete protection, in the
short-t~rm, to groundwater users by treatment of the water at the individual
wells. Long-tem effectiveness will be obtained by implementing addi tional
remedies identified in the next operable unit which will be available for
public carment once developed. The PRPs idientified at this Site will
continue to maintain carbon filters and water. via below grade tanks which
provides both drinking am contact water, which upon chemical analysis
achieves the current standards.
EPA I in consul tati on wi th PADER, has made a prel imi nary
determination that the preferred alternative provides the best balance of
tradeoff with resPeCt to the nine criteria. The preferred alternative is
anticipated to meet the following statutory requirements to:
Protect human heal th and the envi ronnent
- Attain ARARS
- Be cost-effective
Utilize peDnanent solutions and alternative treatment
(or resource recovery) technologies to the maximum
practicable
extent
In smmary, at this time the preferred alternative is i::elieved
to provide the i::est balance of trade-offs among al ternati ves wi th resPeCt
to the criteria used to evaluate ranedies. Based on the. infonnation
available at this time, therefore, EPA and PADER i::elieve the preferred
alternative would i::e protective, would attain ARARS, would i::e cost-
effective, and would utilize permanent solutions arxi alternative
treatment technologies or resource recovery technologies to the maximum
extent practicable.
SChedule
'!be anticipated schedule for completion of the Supplemental
Ranedial Investigation and Feasibility Study is Spring 1989. Rat1edial
Design am Construction for the final ranedy is anticipated to c~nce
in Fall 1989.
-------
- 18 -
C.
statanent of Findings Regarding wetlands and Floodplains
The focus of this decision is to provide an interim remedial
alternative for the contaminated groundwater, defined as the first
operable unit for this site. Further work at this site will consider the
impact of contamination on wetlands, floodplains and surface water. A
wetlands assessment will be performed during the next phase of this
project.
XIII.
The statutory Determinations
A.
Protection of Human Health and the Environment
The selected ranedy will reduce and control the amount of ground-
wa.tercontamination which will ensure adequate protection of human health
and the environment. No' unacceptable short and long-ter.n risks or cross-
media impact will be caused\)y implementation of the remedy.
Based on a review of volatile organic' chemical analytical data
fram collected groundwater samples from impacted off-site wells and given
'.the vinyl chloride concentrations in the untreated groundwater, the use
of ,granular activated carbon filters has proven to be successful in
reducing the concentrations of the copt;aminants of concern (TCE, CCE, VC)
to non-detectable levels. .
B. Attainment of ARARs
The selected remedy will attain the applicable or relevant and
appropriate requirements and are as follows:
Feder al.
Safe Drinking Waste Act
- t'CLs
Clean Water Act
- Ambient Water Quality Criteria
State
Pennsylvania Clean
Streams Law - Section 4~2
- Ambient Water Quality Standards
Additional Requirements for Protectiveness
'!be selected si te ranedy is consistent wi th the following:
Federal Executive Order 11988,
Floodplain Management
40 C.F.R. Part 6, Appendix A
- Action to avoid adverse
effects, minimize potential
harm, restore and preserve
natural beneficial value.
Federal Executive Order 11990,
Protection of wetlands, 40 C.F.R.
Part 6, Appendix A
- Action to minimize
destruction, loss, or
degradation of wetlands.
Federal Clean water Act
- Differential Groundwater
Policy Class IIA aquifer
-------
- 19 -
New Jersey Coastal Plain.
Sole Source Aquifer
- Action to minbnize aquifer
impacts
C.
Cost-effectiveness
The selected remedy provides overall effectiveness commensurate
to its costs such that it represents value for the money. The PRPs are
maintaining the current systems described in the selected remedial
alternative in compliance with the PADER Consent Order and Agreement.
This is a cost savings to the government.
Utilization of permanent solutions employing alternative
technologies to the maximum extent practicable
D.
The selected remedy is the most appropriate solution for this
operable unit and represents the maximum extent to which permanent
solutions and treat~entcan be practicable utilized. ~
E.
Preference for treatment as a principal element
The preference is satisfied since treatment is ~~e principal
element of the chosen alternative.
-------
APPENDIX A
-------
'" ?fau
Summary of Analy~ical Da~a for Domes~ic Well and Carbon Sys~em
All concen~ra~ions ~g/l. par~s per billion. ppb.
Analyses by EPA ~e~hods 601 and 602. OR 624 (indica~ed by.) .
MID A samples refer :0 be~ween primary and secondary ~anks.
RAW I
Sample Tap I
Sampling To~al I
Da~e Gallons ABC I
-----------------------------------1
09/13/95 4 15 NO I
10/03/95 4 15 NO I
01/27/96 156 NO I
OS/21/96* 4634 NO 10 NO I
09/20/96. 7979 BHDL 20 ND I
11/20/86. 11120 BHDL 10 NO I
2/16/97. 14410 BHDL BMCL NO I
5/ 4/87. 22150 BMDL BMDL NO I
7/27/97- 25250 BHDL 10 NO I
10/20/97. 29180 BHDL 20 NO I
1/11/88- 32670 BHDL 10 ND I
4/8/88- 41700 NO EMCL ND I
KEY
------------------------
blank space - no~ applicable
--- - indica~es no~ sampled
NO - none de~ec:ed
A l.l-Oichloroe~hene
3 1.1.1-Trichloroechane
C - '!'oluene
o - Me~hylene
Issue Date:
MIO A I
Sample Tap I
- - - - - - - - I
ABC I
----------------1
. I
I
NO NO NO I
NO NO NO I
NO BMDL BMDL I
NO NO NO I
NO NO NO I
NO NO ND I
ND NO NO I
NO ND NO I
NO NO ND I
NO ND ND I
AFTER CARBON
Sample Tap'
I
I
I
ABC D I
~--~-----------~----I
I
I
NO NO I
NO NO I
NO NO I
NO .. NO I
NO NO I
ND NO I
NO NO I
NO NO I
ND SMeLl
NO NO I
'7
1
NO
NO
ND
NO
NO
NO
ND
NO
ND
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
ND
NO
NO
ND
NO
000147
-------
Ferrell/Fischer
Summary of Analytical Data for Domestic Well.
All concentrations ug/l, parts per biltion, ppb.
Analyses by EPA methods 601 and 602, OR 624 (indicated by.) .
Sampling
Date
RAW Sample Tap
A
B
c
----------------------------------
8/14/85
5/21/86-
8/20/86-
11/21/86-
2/16/87-
5/ 8/87-
8/ 4/87-
10/26/87-
1/18/88 -
4/7/88-
ND
NO
ND
ND
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
ND
ND .
ND
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
KEY
------------------------
ND - none detected
A - trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
9 - Trichloroethene
C - l,l,l-Trichloroethane
Issue Date: S /~/? Y .
/
/~~
000148
-------
.J. EtfQ'en/AJ.c.88088 . lU.aD8I''tOn CoWlUy Iou.
t~y of Anal":'lc.al !)aU t02 0cae8C.1G ..11 aM Cuban SyR-
All conC8ftu&tlOn8 "'Q/t. pan.. per bl1l10t1, ppa.
AM1Y.8 by irA au"" 601 aM 102. C8 U.t (1ncU.cac.M by -).
..tD A -.1'1" relu c.o bet._n 02181U'y an4 ..Clcutd.u'y tAlli8. 1.t~ !\an4 c.raJ.18 .. you ~a08 C.h8 -.,.c._.
"10 . -.01- r.tv too -c._n pl'wary ano "CDnGarY t.&I\88o r1Gnc. /'1.8114 tol'un .. you (ace toM _yn_.
U .... 1n41cac... tlrn _.011,n; p8rto~ IOUOWllUI r'808dd1.ll;.
1 1 1 1
IAII _18 Y~'. 1 "10 A _18 Y~ 1 "'0 1 _18 Y~ 1 ~. CAUC8 s-Ole!'ap 1
_11"" YCK&1 - - - _....---- - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - ,
"".. t:::811oe A c: 0 1 .. 1 A I c: 0 . , .. 1 I J 1 1 0 I , 1 A I c: 0 I , c: I , J 1
1 ------------------------1 --------1 -----------------------:""--1
1112/81 2tO UO 101 1 1 1
1110'1' ItS1 UO 110 131 lID 10 lID 10 10 10 ID 10 ID 101 lID 10 lID 101 -- -. -- --I
1117/1. 202" - - - - -I lID 10 ID 10 lID , III 10 lID 10' ID 10 ID " ID ... lID 10 ID I' 10 10 ID 10/
112'7/1' ""'7' -I ID 1 ID 10 lID 10 10 10 ID 101 lID 10 ID 101 lID 10 lID 10 ID 10 10 10 ID 101
21 J/I' ..'U - - - - -I 1 2 ID 10 ID 10 ID 2 ID 101 ID 10 ID 10' ID 10 ID 10 ... 10 ID 10 lID 10'
2/1 'I" 121"0 -I ID , ID 10 ID 10 ID 10 ID 101 ' "0 ID 101 lID 10 lID 10 ID 10 ID 10 110 101
2124/1' 1$21$) - - - -- -I ID , ID 10 ID Iii ID 10 10 101 12 10 ID 101 10 10 ID 10 ID 10 lID 10 II) 101
21 1/1' 1-""" --I ID .. lID 10 ID 10 lID' 10 10 101 U 10 ID 101 lID 10 ID 10 110 10 10 10 ID 101
JI10/1' 1,U01 - - - - -I ID ]I ID 10 ID 10 ID 10 lID 101 " 10 1 101 ID 10 ID 10 10 10 10 10 ID 10'
1/1 '''' 211902 -I ... " ID 1 1 10 10 10 lID 101 n 10 1 101 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 101
U 1/24/" 2.tJJ12 -I ID 10 ID 10 ID 10 ID 10 ID 101 ID 10 lID 101 ID 10 ID 10 lID 10 ID '0 10 101
111111' J12"Q --I ID 10 ID 10 ID 10 10 10 ID 101 ID 10 ID 101 ... 10 10 10 ... 10 10 .0 ... 101
., ".. "8522 -- - - -- --I ID 2 10 10 ... 10 ... 10 10 101 1 10 ID 10' ID 10 ID 10 ID 10 ID 10 ID 101
4/1418' 222510 2.0 210 ... 10 101 ID 13 lID 10 ID 10 ID 10 10 101 . 10 ... 10' - - - --,
tn1/" HUn - -- -- -- --, ... .. ID 10 1 10 10 10 ID 101 2C 10 ID 101 ID 10 10 10 ID 10 ID 10 ID !f01
41%1"1 JI1H, --I ... 120 ID 10 ID 10 ... . ... ..., 17 1 2 101 ... 10 ... 10 ... 10 ID 10 ... 1101
II 51" 40ntO - - -- -- --I ID 170 2 1 2 10 ... 10 ... 10' 120 1 2 10' ID 10 10 10 10 10 NO 10 10 101
5/tZ/" 440'41 - -- --I ID 210 2 10 2 10 10 10 10 10' 110 1 2 10' ... 10 ... 10 10 10 NO 10 NO 'liD I
U 5/1'''' --I ... 10 ID 10 ID 10 ID 10 ID 101 lID 10 ID 101 10 10 10 10 ... 10 ." 10 II) 101
5/22"" "'411 uo 200 1IC1, 10 10""" 10' 10 10 ... 10 lID 10 lID 10 ... 101 10 10 ... 10, "" 10 ... 10 ... 10 NO 10 ." 101
" ),,, "0)4' --I 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10' ' "0 10 10' 10 10 10 10 lID '0 10 10 10 1DI
" "" '1'450 -I ... 10 ... 10 10 10 ID 10 10 101 2 10 ID 101 10 10 10 10 !ID 10 ID 10 lID 101
6/16'" 610"3 -- - --I ID 10 ... 10 10 10 !ID 10 ID 101 U 10 ID 101 "" 10 50 10 lID 10, 10 10 ..c 101
6/21'" Ut.J11 -- -- -- -- -I "" . ID 10 10 10 ID 10 ID 10' 22 10 lID 101 ID 10 ID 10 ID 10 ID 10 10 ~Ol
6/)0/" ""111 -- -- -- -- --I 10 21 lID 10 lID 10 ... 10 10 MOl so 10 10 101 10 10 ID 10 10 10 10 10 10 !'I 0 I
'1 1/" UGtll - -- -- --I 10 1) ID 1 2 10 10 10 ID 101 U 10 1 101 lID 10 10 10 10 10 '." 10 ID 101
1/141/" 7lU20 - -- -- -- --I 10 120 ID 10 1 10 ,10 10 ID 101 "0 10 1 10' 10 '0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 101
U 1/21/" """0 -I ... 10 10' 10 10 10 !ID 10 liD 101 10 10 10 10' "" 10 ID 10 10 10 ID 10 "" 10'
11211". 812"0 20. 280 IIcn. lID 10 IMDL 101 10 10 10 10 10 lID .IID 10 "" 101 IIIIDL 10 10 101 ID 10 ... 10 "" 10 ID 10 NO <0'
"2'''' ""00 --I ID 2 10 10 10 10 'ill 10 ID 101 , 10 10 10, -- - -- -- -- -- -- --,
" '"' '40"" -- - -- -- --I liD 21 ... 10 ID 10 1~ 10 1111 101 ., 10 "" 10' -- -- -- -- - -- -- --,
tl2"" 1 00 '"0 --I -- -- -- - -- -- --I -- -- -- --I 10 10 ... 10 10 10 lID 10 ID 101
U "10'" 1031141 --1- 10 10 ... 10 10 10 '-\0 10, ID 101 ID 10 ID 10' ... 10 ID 10 10 10 10 10 NO 10'
10/2'''' 1151'710 -- -- - -- --I 10 . ID 10 ... 10 :~ 10 lID 101 ' "0 10 10' -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --,
U 11/211"- 12"'20 200 2 iO IfC)I, lID 10 IIIIDI. 101 10 10 "" 10 10 10 -'II 10 ID 101 ID 10 ID 10' lID 10 10 10 10 10 NO 10 lID 10'
1212'"' 13'''''SO -- -- -- -- --I ID ) ID 10 "" 10 ,.0 10. NO 101 1 10 10 .101 -- -- -- -- -- --,
%I 2/81 UOZU'O -- -- --I -- -- -- 'liD --, -- --, ... 10 10 10 ... 10 NO 10 10 101
U 2/ 41t1- 15]4660 - -- - - --, lID 10 ... 10 10 10 10 10 101 10 10 ID 101 10 10 ID 10 10 10 ID 10 10 !lOI
21161". 15"'10 110 210..,.,1. ID !fO I!IMDI, 10' "" 10 10 10 ... 10 )1) 10 ID 10' ID 10 ID 10' NO 10 ID 10 10 10 lID 10 10 !IIDt
)J tll1 1 "2110 - -- -- -- -- -- --I 10 . 10 10 10 10 r'P 10 "" 101 . 10 III 10' - - -- -- -- -- -- --,
" 1/.1 1 ""70 - -- -- -- -, -- -- -- -- --, -- - - -, ID 10 III 10 ID 10 ID 10 ,10 101
U ., 2/17 1111110 - -- -- -- --I ID 10 "" 10 !III 10 >0 10 2 101 ID 10 10 101 ID 10 lID 10 ID 10 ID 10 10 10'
51 1/"- 1 tu'''o iao 210 1lCl1o ID ,MO 8MDL 101 1U) »mL. lID 10 10 10 ~ 10 10 10' IIIIDL 10 lID 10' !Ill 10 lID 10 10 10 10 10 III 101
5122/81 2020100 - -- -- -- --, 10 :10 10 10 2 10 :10 10 lID 10' K 10 1 101 ID 10 10 10 1111 10 lID 10 10 101
U 512'1" 2040'10 -- - - -- -- -- --, ID 10 ID 10 ... 10 OIl 10 2 10' ID 10 ID 10' 10 10 lID 10 ID 10 lID 10 ID 10/
6I2S111 216'120 - -- -- -- --, 10 ) II) 10 10 10 -~ 10 l2 10' '2 ID lID 10/ - -- - - -- - -- -,
1/21/81 2113110 - -- -- -- --, -- -- -- -- -- - - -;; 1-;~: -- -- -- --, lID ID III 10 III !It! 'Ill 10 ID 10'
U 1/22/11 nlt300 - --1- - --, ID 10 ID 10 ID 10 ~ lID ID 10 ID 10' ID II) ID 10 ID 10 ID 10 ID 101
1/14/81-' 24)1'20 220 100 .8IC)L ID 10...... 10' -- -- -- - - -- --, -- -- -- --I -- -- - -- -- -- -- - -- --,
1/11/81 24$JO'0 -I ID I lID 10 lID 10 ... 10 2 J 10' 2 10 lID 10' - -- - -- -- -- - --I
U " 2/81 UZO"O --, ID 10 ID 10 ... 10 *' 10 1m 801 ID 10 lID 101 -- - - -- -- - -- --,
10/ 2/11 2 "0'44 --I lID If "" 10 10 10 ,12 10 lID 11 lID 10 ID 101 - -- -- -- -- -- - --I
10/20/11. 2141S40 no 410 ...,L ID .0 8mL 101 -- -- -.-.- -- - --I -- --I -- - -- -- -- -- -- - -- --,
/21/81 21"'010 - -- -- -- -- - -, -- - -- -- -- -- ...... -- -- --I -- - -- -, ID 10 II) 10 "" 10 .. 10 "" .01
'04/" 2810410 -, lID 2 10 10 lID 10 IIID lID eO 101 La La La 1.11, III 10 ID 10 10 10 ID 10 ID 101
ZO/" 2810250 -I ID 10 ID 10 lID ID lID 10 lID' 101 1 10 ID 10' -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - -- --,
"I' 2"0"10 -, - - - - - -I - - - -I ... 10 ID 10 lID 10 ",,' 10 ID 10'
110'" 2 "'5]0 --I lID 10 lID 00 lID 00 ID 10 lID lID' "" 10 ID 101 lID 10 ID 10 ID 10 10 10 10 101
1/0"". )111310 -I ID 2 ID 10 lID 10 ID ID ID 10' ID 10 ID 101 -- - - --,
1/11/". 2122410 210 ) '0 JlC)lo lID 10 ID 101 - - -- - - -I -- - -- --, -- - -- - -- -- -- -- -- --j
1/2"1'. 21uno --, - -- - - -- -I -- - - -I ID 10 lID 10 ... 10 lID 10 '10 101
U 1/2"11. 2150400 --I ID 10 III) 10 10 10 lID ID III 101 10 ID 801 10 ID ID 10 ID 10 "" 10 ID "DI
2/2"". 2102200 --I "" 10 10 10 IDI 10 ID 10 III 101 10 ID 10' -- - - - -- -- -- - -- --,
3/1"". 211U10 -I -- - -- - - -- - --I -- - - --I lID 10 III 10 III 10 "" 10 "" 101
'" 1/1"". )]12560 --, 10 10 ID 10 ID 10 !ID 10 ID 101 ID 10 ID 10' ID 10 ID 10 10 10 NO 10 10 "01
4/0.11.. 15256)0 2)0 210 ...,L ID .0 8tDL 10' -- - -- - -- -- -- -I -- --, -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --,
!
-------
!'lID A Ji&M.pl..
MID B sAmplea
c. R. Davis' sons
summary oC Analytical Data Cor Domastic Wall and carbon System
All concentrations uq/l. PArts per ~illion. ~~D.
Analyses Dy ~PA mathods 601 and 602, or 624 (Indicatad Dy '),
reter to betw..n pr~ry ~nd ieeondary ~ank., left hand train A' you face the Jy.tam.
reter to bet...n primAry ~nd .econdary tank', riqht hand train al you face the 'Y1t...
R8 - indicata. Cir.t samplinq perCormed Collowinq reD8ddinq.
I MID A I MID B I I
ItA. Sasple Tap I sample Tap I Sample Tap 1 Al"!'ZR CAABOK Sample Tap 1
Sampl1nq Toul I -I - 1 I
Dat. C;allona A B C 0 IS P C; I A B P I A B P C; H I A B C 0 ~ !" C; I
-----------------------------------------------------1 ---------------1 -------------------------1 -----------------------------------1
1114/15 670 780 14 J 1 HI) HI) 1 1 1 I
1/17/86fl) 480 620 10' HI) HI) lID HI) I I I 1
1/27186fl) 500 730 HI) HI) HI) lID HI) I I I I
21 5/86 39750 ---I HI) 1 HI) t HI) 1 HI) HI) HI) I 2 2 HI) HI) HI) HI) HI) I
2/17/86 43950 ---I lID HI) lID 1 HI) HI) HI) HI) HI) I 1 J HI) HI) NO HI) NOI
5/22186. 69990 550 620 BMDL HI) HI) BMDL HI) I HI) HI) HI) 1 HI) HI) HI) HI) HI) 1 MD MD HI) HI) If 0 lID IfDI
1/21/86. 100550 5JO 770 BMDL MD MD BMDL HI) I HI) HI) HI) 1 HI) HI) HI) HI) MDI MD HI) HI) MD HI) HI) MDI
11/20/86. 1J1010 490 750 10 HI) MD MD BMDLI HI) HI) MDI HI) If!) HI) If!) If!) 1 MD HI) HI) MO HI) If!) MDI
2/10/87' 121 490 720 BMDL MD If!) BMDL BMDLI MD MD HI) I HI) HI) If!) MD HI) I HI) HI) MD HI) MD lID MDI
51 4/87. (J) 7910 520 710 BMDL HI) HI) BMDL BMDLI HI) If!) BMDL I HI) If!) BMD L HI) MDt NI) NI) NI) HI) MD MD IfDI
7/27187. 29890 600 760 10 MD NI) BMD L BMDLI NI) MD BMDLI HI) If!) 10 MD MDt MD MD If!) HI) MD MD MDI
~B 1/17/87. 4JOOO ---I NI) MD HI) I HI) NI) HI) MD MDt ---I
10/20/87. 58010 JIO 610 BMDL If!) HI) NI) MDt MD NI) If!) I HI) MD NI) MD MD. NI) MD MD NI) MD MD MD.
1/11/... 76520 470 760 BMDL NI) MD BMD L I!KDL I HI) NI) NI) I MD MD MD MD I!KDL I MD MD MD If!) MD, MD MDI
416/... 114610 620 640 I!KDL NI) NI) If!) HI) I If!) MD HI) I NI) MD MD MD MDI MD MD MD NI) MD MD MDI
KEY ReD8d Ga110n
------------------------ O~t. ~e.dinq
1 - .1qniCie. new well installed ln 1/1,.
2 - flow meter w.. removed from service by ownar.
) - new mater w.. in.talled on 4/14/11.
blanx space - not applicable
--- - indicate. not .ampl!p
NO - none Qet8ctad
A - ~r1chloro.then.
B - ~ran.-l,2,-Dlchloro.than. ;
C - l,l-Cichloroethena 'I
D - l,2-DlchloroproPAne 'I
E - 1,1, l-Trichloroac.hane . -.J
!" - Vinyl <:hlorlda c:..J.,!/
C; - l,2-Dichloroethane ~ ~ ,. c-..A'~
1saue Data: S;//~/ff I -4 ~
-------
D. Sands
Summary of Analy~ical Da~a for Domestic Well and Carbon Sys~em
All concen~ra~ions uQ/1, par~s per billion, ppb.
Analyses by EPA me~hods 601 and 602. OR 624 (indica~ed by .j.
MID A samples refer to be~~een primary and secondary tanks.
RAil I
Sample Tapl
SamplinQ Total -I
Date Gallons ABC I
------~-------------~------------I
8/12/85 3 l' 91
10/ 3185 3 2 91
2/03/86 1008 ---I
5/22/86* 21135 ND NO BMDLI
8/~1/86* 42539 BMDL NO BMDLI
11/20/86*- 60180 BMDL NO BMDLI
2/10/87* 75994 BMDL NO BMDLI
5/ 8/87* 91480 BMDL ND BMDLI
7/31/87* NA BMDL NO BMDLI
10/26/87. 124460 NO ND BMDLI
:/18/88* 139210 BMDL NO BMDLI
4/06/88~ 153700 NO NO BMDLI
KEY
I AFTER CARBON .,
I Sample Tap I
-I -I '
A B CI ABC I
---------------1' ------~-----------I
I . 1
I ..1
Nt) NO I Nt) NO ND ,
Nt) BHOLI Nt). NO Nt) I
Nt) NO I Nt) NO ND I
Nt) NO I ND NO ND I
Nt) NO I Nt) NO ND I
ND NO I ND NO ND I
ND BMDLI ND ND NO I
Nt) SHOLl ND ND ND I
NO SHOLl ND. ND NO I
ND SHOLl ND ND NO I
NO
NO
NO
Nt)
NO
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
MID A
Sample Tap
------------------------
blank space - no~ applicable
--- - indicates not sampled
NO - none detected
A - l,l-Dichloroethene
a - l,l-Dichloroethane
e - l,l,l-Trichloroethane
Issue Date: ~/;~/~~
I /
9" ' ~./ .
. J--/~~
/ 7 /
000151
-------
MalON . 1'88081'
5\&8&1'Y ot AAa.l~lca.1. Oac.a !fU OcaeU,lc ..11 and c:.uban SY.C.
AU conC8nCl'aC101t. :Jq/l.. pAn.' pel' b1Ulon. pptt.
""a1y... by UA _t:.hOli. 601 and. 602. 01 U. U.ndlcat.84 by.).
MtD A '.1'.1." l'.t.1' t:.o Dec......n ;l1'18&1'Y 8110 '8CO~y tana.. l.t~ han4 tl'&1.n .. yo" t..08 U. .y.t_.
MID 8 '-0.1.8. 1'8tW :0 Mc.....n pr18&1'Y MO MCOn4&ry t..&lW.. rlQ'M' t\&fto t.r&1n .. you t&c:8 U\8 .y.ce.
U ~ .1.n4J.caCa. UrIc. ..-pllN; pet'toned tolloW11'111 1'--41,..
.... 1 MtD" 1 "10 I 1
_1.e-r... 1 Se'01. Tag 1 _1.e TOIl 1
Ta..l - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - 1
C&11o". " " 0 r Q 1 .. . C 0 I .r I 1 .. . " o. I r I I
1 ----------1 ---------------1
600 260 11 1 3 10 101 I I
S50 260 10 10 10 ID 101 -- .- -- -- --I -I
un - --I 10 10 10 10 10 10 lID 1 10 10 10 lID 80 10 101
tS!O - - - -- -I 10 1 80 80 lID 2 801 80 80 80 80 10 10 101
uno ..0 320 10 IIIDJ. _L 10 301 10 _L 10 10 lID 10 lID 1 10 IIIDL 8D 80 80 80 101
32330 600 350 20 110'-10 lID 101 IID_L 10 80 10 80 -801 - ND 8mt. 10 lID 10 lID 101
uno "0 210 10 IIIDJ. _L ID 801 lID _L ID 10 10 80 801 80 IIIDL 10 ID 10 lID 101
51120 no no 20 IIIDJ. -L ID 201 ID -L 10 10 lID 10 101 _L 10 10 10 - 10 lID IDI
U550 - - - -- --I IID-L 10 10 lID 10 101 10 lID 10 10 10 ID 101
'U.. 390 300 10 IIIDJ. _L ID 201 ID 80 10 10 80 10 801 10 IIIDL 10 80 10 lID 101
'UtO no 380 10 !MDt. IIG~- NO 301 10 I>C)L 10 10 80 80 lID 1 -L IIIDJ. 10 ID 10 80 101
"'20 510 260 10 IIIDL _L ID _LI lID I>C)L lID 10 lID 10 lID 1 .0 IIIDL 10 NO 80 80 .01
uno 520 280 10 IIIDL -L tID IJI)LI lID -L ID 80 lID 8D 8101.1 »CL MDt. 80 lID 80 IID IIICL I
IOU50 SlO 300 ".U. IMDt. IICL 10 801 8IDL IICL 10 .0 80 10 801 »1)1. MDL 10 10 10 80 101
---
.... C8&J.!on.
'_11"<1'
:>a..
II12/1S
11/14/15
11/27/15
11101"
5/2111'.
1120/"-
11/20/".
211""-
U 31 2/87-
51 C/.'-
"2""-
10/20/81-
i/ll/"-
C/O"..-
"u
------------
blani: ~ - not. aoOJ.lc.Ul.
-- - 1.tIcUc:.atA. not:. ~.1.'"
!fC - non. 4I8c..c::t.8d.
A - 1'rlcJ\J.orOl8U.".
S - trM.-1.2.-01c~OZOl8t.han.
C - 1.1-01d\lo.1"08CheM
i) - 1. 1-01c.hlo~t.n.u.
r. - 1. %-Olc.blorap,l'opan.
r - rol...en.
~ - Vlnyl 0\101'1-
a - *r.J\yl.... ~1~1-
I..". 081;.8:1
-----------
1/ 2/11
,$3.10
.0 /)/;-
.~~~I
/ j
&I"rU C&UCII I
_1.e T. 1
- - - - - - - - - - - I
.. . " 0 I r Q I
---------------1
I
10 80 lID 10 lID 10 lID 1
80 10 lID 80 lID .0 801
80 10 ID 80 10 .0 801
lID 10 ID .0 lID 10 lID 1
80 .0 lID 80 80 .0 80'
10 80 l1li 80 lID .0 10'
lID 10 ID 10 10 10 801
- -- -- -- --I
IIIDJ. _L ID ID 10 .0 80,
IIIDL_L l1li 10 lID 80 801
80 10 lID .0 lID 00 801
lID 80 80 80 80 10 801
10 10 lID 10 ...- 8D 801
000152
-------
.. Kapwaac I K. E. Pif.r
su=sary aC An.1y~ic.1 C.~. Car Came.tlc ..11 .nc C.rban Sy.~em
All conc.ntr.~ion. uq/l, par~. per billion, ppo.
An.ly... by EPA ~.~hac. 601 anc 602. OR 624 (lnclc.~.c Dy .).
retor to between pri~ry and ..conaary tan.., 18ft ~and tr~in .. you race the system.
reter tQ betw.en pr~~ry Ana lecondary tanka, riqht nand train .. you face the .yat...
RB - lnclc.~.a Clr.~ .a~p1lnq p8rCa~.c Callawinq r.beddlnq.
!tIC A ..mp1u
MIC B aamp1u
RAIf i
SaIOpl. T.p 1
S.mpllnq Ta~.l -I
Cac. Gallana ABC C & r I
---------------------------------------------------,
1/~3/15 770 670 lID lID lID lID I
10/21/15 640 620 7 2 3 HCI
III 221 15 3290 lID I
1/27186 12316 HOI
5/21/86. 27297 740 670 SllDI. If!) SllDI. lID I
8/20/86. 39220 670 760 SllDI. lID BMDI. lID I
11/20/86. 50230 670 710 SllDI. BKDI. BKDI. HO I
RB 12/23/16. 54182 ---I
2I~0/87. 60221 760 830 BllDI. lID BMDI. NOI
51 8/87. 70770 750 770 BllDI. !ID BMI:I. HO I
81 4187. 82000 510 780 BMDI. BKDI. BMDL BMI:LI
RB 8/18/87. 14500 ---I
10/26/870 92910 510 650 !ID !ID HC NO I
1/11181. 104410 660 710 BllDI. !ID BHDI. HOI
~S 2/16/.'. 101120 ---t
4/07/81. 116240 620 690 BHDL !ID !ID HCI
.!{"!y
------------------------
~l.r.x 'pace - not applicable
--- - in~lcat.. not lampled.
ND - ~on. detected
A - ~r1Ch~oro.tn.n.
3 - ~ran.-l,2,-01chloro.th.n.
~ - :,l-cicnloroetnana
J - 1,2-0ichloroprop.ane
e - 1. 1, l'.~Trich'loro.th&n.
: - 1.2-D~chlara.~h,n.
:..u. C.U: :S!;;;.../p j
::/ I
:!
!tIC A I MIC B t AFTER CARBON I
SaIOpl. T.p I SUlp1. Tap t SUlp18 T.p I
- I - 1 -I
A B C C & I A B C " & I A B C " & r I
-------------------------, -------------------------, ------------------------------/
I I I
---I ---I 2 2 !ID !ID lID !lD1
!ID 2 !ID !ID !ID I 1 4 ND HC NCI lID lID !ID 111) lID !ID I
I 4 !ID lID .HCI 1 6 !ID !ID !ID I !ID !ID !ID !ID NC lID I
BKDI. 10 lID MD NCI BHDI. 20 !ID !ID MDI MD !ID !ID !ID lID !fD I
BHDI. 20 He !ID HOI BMDI. 20 !ID N'c !ID I !ID !ID HC lID He HDI
BHDI. 10 !ID !ID NCI BKDI. 20 !ID HC NDi !ID' !ID lID !ID !fD lID 1
!ID NC !ID HC NCI !ID !ID !ID HD HOI ---I
HD BHDI. !ID !ID NCI !ID BMDI. !III !ID NDI !ID !ID lID !ID HD HDI
!ID BHDI. !ID !ID HD I !ID BHDI. !ID NO !ID I !ID !ID !ID HD HD HD I
BMDI. 20 NC NO NCI BHDI. 20 !ID !ID NOI NC HD !ID HD HD !ID I
HD !ID !ID !ID NDI !ID !ID ND !ID NOI
HD BHDI. NO !fD !fCI !ID BHD L !ID !ID NOI HD HD !fC !ID HD NOI
!ID 10 !ID lID HD I ND BHD L !ID !ID !ID I ND !ID NO HD lID !fD I
BHD L !3MCI. HD !ID !ID I ND !ID NO NO !ID I ---I
BMDL BMDI. !ID !ID HD I 20 BHDI. NO !ID HCI HD NO !ID !ID !fD '!ID I
Rebec GAllon
~~t.. ~eadlnq
----------------------
~2/221U 53990
8/17/87 84390
2115/11 101..0
1~~LJtr
(/
: j
"of
tl
j
. I
00015~
-------
. C. AnU~on/T. "o'~er - Cr1cke~ Corner
Summary ot An.1y~lc.1 O.~. 'or 00M8.~1c .e11 .nd C.rbon Sy.~..
All concen~r.~1one uq/1, plr~. per b11110n, ppD.
An.ly.e. by ~PA ~e~hod' 601 .n~ 602, OR 624 (lnd1c.ted by ...
MID A sampl.. reter ~o betw.en prim.ry ~n~ .econdAry t~n.,. lert hand tr~ln al you fAce the system.
MID B saspl.. reter ~a between primary and lecondary tankl. riqht hand train AI you face the .yat...
I I I
RAIl S&IIIIle Tap I KIO A S&llple Tap I MIO II S&llple Tip I
SlJIIplinq Tot.l -I -I -I
0&1:8 Gallon. A IS C 0 II .. I A II C 0 II .. I A II C 0 II .. 1
--------------------------------------------------1 ------------------------------1 ------------------------------1
1114185 620 610 11 2 2 NOI I I
:1/07185 230 600 540 NO NO NO NOI --I ---I
11/27185 560 ---I NO MD NO NO NO MDI NO NO NO NO NO NOt
S/2l/U' 3111 570 530 BllDL NO BIID!. NOI NO MD 'MD NO NO NOI MD MD NO NO NO NO I
1/20/U' 4550 610 740 10 ND" BllDL NOI NO MD NO MD NO NOI NO NO NO NO NO NOI
:1/20/16' 5120 400 480 BllDL NO NO BMDLI NO MD NO MD NO NOI NO ND NO ND NO NOI
2110/17' 6950 340 370 BMD!. ND NO NOI ND MD ND ND ND NOI NO ND ND ND NO NOI
51 1117' 8130 650 630 BMDL NO NO NOI MD MD NO NO NO NOI ND NO NO NO NO NOI
II 5187' 9200 470 550 BIID!. NO ~O NOI NO ND ND ND NO NDI NO NO NO NO ND NOI
:0/27187' 10400 410 510 ND NO NO NDI NO MD NO NO ND NDI NO NO NO NO ND NOI
1/191'" 11170 560 110 BMD!. ~O NO ~Ol NO MD ND NO ND NOI NO NO NO ND NO NOI
4/011'" 12190 440 540 BIID!. NO NO NOI ND NO ND ND ND NOI ND ND NO ND ND NOI
KEY
ArTER CARBON SlJIIple ~'p I
-,
A II COli .. I
------------------------------,
i
MDI
NDI
NDI
MDI
MDI
NOt
MDI
MDI
MDI
MDI
MDI
------.-----------------
~l~nk space - not appliC&ble
--- - inai~t.. not l&Mp18a
~ - ~on. d.t8~.d
A trichloroethane
3 - ~:&nl-l.2.-Dicnloroeth.n.
= - i,l-DicnIara.thene
~ - 1,2-01chlaropropane
~ - 1. 1. l-Trlc:-:loroeth.ne n ~ ~-d;;-
F - 1.2-0ichloroetnan., , J ~ -.
:..ue ~.te: !,:://.l;f;r,.....- c-'- '~/~' ~-". 1
. ./ ' / . .
. "..../ l/
ND
ND
NO
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
MD
NO
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
000154
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
MD
NO
ND
NO
ND
NO
MD
MD
NO
MD
ND
MD
ND
NO
ND
NO
NO
NO
-------
" R. Adams
Summary "of Analytical Oata for Domestic Well and Carbon
Ali concentrations ug/l, parts per billion, ppb.
Analyses by ~PA methods 601 and 602, OR 624
MIO A samples refer to between primary and secondacy tanks.
System
(indicated by .).
RAW I MIO A I AFTER I
Sample Tap I Sample Tap I CARBON Tap I
Sampling Total -I - I -I
Oate Gallons ABC I ABC I ABC I
------------------~-----------------('---------------I ---------------1
8/12185 8 5 21 I . I
10/ 4/85 2 1 21 I I
3/17/86 8585 ---I NO NO NO I NO NO NO I
5/21/86* 32655 NO NO NO I NO NO NO I NO NO NOI
8/20/86* 60659 BMDL BMDL BMDLI NO NO NO I NO NO NO I
11/21/86* 94010 10 BMDL NO I NO NO NO I NO NO NO I
2/10/87* 126666" NO NO NO I NO NO NO I NO NO NO I
5/ 4/87* 159028 ND NO NO I NO NO ND I NO ND NO I
7/27/87* 195390 BMDL NO NO 1 ND NO NO I NO NO NO I
10/20/87* 225820 10 BMDL NO I BMDL BMOL NO I NO" NO NDI
1/11/88* 255910 NO ND NO I ND NO NDI NO NO NDI
4/06/88* 286560 ND NO NO I NO NO NDI ND ND NDI
KEY
--------------------------------
blank space - not applicable
--- - indicates not sampled
ND - none detected
BMDL - Below minimum detection
A - Trichloroethene
a - trans-l,2,-Dicn10roethene
C - Tetrachloroethene
si ;l-
/
limit
Issue Date:
~L*
/
. 4.t .
000155
-------
E. A. Solomon
Summary of Analytical Daea for Domestic Well and Carbon Syseem
All concentrations ug/l, parts per billion, ppb.
Analyses by EPA methods 601 and 602, OR 624 (indicated by -) .
MID A samp:es refer to bee ween primary and, secondary tanks.
RAW . ...... l MID A I AFTER CARBON 1
Sample Tap I Sample Tap I Sample Tap I
Sampling Total 1 I I
Date Gallons A 8 C D I A 8 C D I A B C D I
--------------------------------------1 --------------------1 --------------------1
2/ 3/86 190 53 3 11 I I
3/24/86 984 ---I ND ND ND. NDI ND ND ND NDI
5/21/86* 131D7 250 70 BMDL NDI ND' ND ND NDI ND NO NO NDI
8/2.0/86*. . .27120 280 110 BMDL NO I ND ND ND NO I ND NO NO. NO I
11/20/86* 41210 230 70 BMDL BMDLI NO NO .NO NDI NO ND NO NOI
2/16/87* 52240 210 50 BMDL NDI NO BMDL NO NOI NO NO NO NO I
5/ 8/87* 62930 280 70 BMDL BMDLI NO BMDL ND NOI NO NO NO NO I
8/ 4/87- 76140 280 70 BMDL NO I NO BMDL NO NDI NO NO NO NOI
10/26/87* 87810 240 60 NO NO I NO ND NO NDI ND NO NO NOI
1/19/88* 103880 190 60 NO NO I NO 3MDL NO NO I NO NO ND NOI
4/7/88* 118670 270 60 NO NO I BMDL3MDL NO NO I NO NO ~D NO I
KEY
------------------------
blank space - not. applicable
--- - indicaees not sampled
NO - none detected
A - Trichloroethene
3 - trans-1.2-0ichloroethene
C - l.l-Oichloroethene /
D - 1. 2~Oichloroeeh~e 'J 0.. -:- !
Issue Date: 51r~?Y" .1.~-t(,.un
I / /: /:J
1../
. .
000156
-------
5umrr.ary ==
,\:1
~. Adams - Kimber Hall
A~aly~ical Oa~a for Oomes~ic Well and Carbon Sys~em
co~cen~ra~ions ~g/l, par~s per Dillion, ppo.
A~alyses by SPA methods 601 and 602, OR 624 (i~dicated by -).
primary and secondary tanks, lef~ hand trai~ as you face the system.
primary and secondary tanks, right ~and train as you face the system.
~!O A samples refer to betNeen
~!D S samples refer ~o cetNeen
RAW ~!O'A i M!O B 1 AFTER 1
Sample Tap Sample Tap 1 Sample Tap 1 CARBON Tap. I
Sampling 1'otal I I -I 1
Oa~e Gallons A S ~ I A S c I A S c I A S C 0 I
~ ---------------------------------1 -------------'--1 ---"----.-------- 1 --------------------1
8/14/85 2 8 . ~O I 1 I I
10/ 4/85 2 8 NO I I I I
2/19/86 27495 ---I ~D ~O 121 NO NO NO 1 NO NO NO 11
5/21/86* 70279 SMD!.. 10 NOI ND NO NOI NO NO NO I NO NO NO ND i
8/20/86* 110813 ~O 10 ~Ol ~O NO NOI NO NO NO I .NO NO ND NO!
11/20/86* 153440 S~.DL SMD!.. NO I ND NO NOI NO NO NO I NO NO NO NDI
2/11/87* 203260 SMD!.. SMD!.. )10 I ND NO NOI ~O NO NO 1 NO NO NO NO I
5/13/87* 263080 SMD!.. SMD!.. NDI NO NO NOI ND ~O NO I NO NO NO NO I
8/14/87- 315300 SMD!.. 10, NO I ;!D NO NO I ~O 31-'.D!.. NO 1 NO ND NO NO I
:0/26/87'* 35'0240 NO 3MDL N;)I ND NO NDI NO 3MD!.. NO I NO NO NO NO I
1/19/88* 392050 8~L SMD!.. NDI ~:J 3MDL NO I ND 3MD!.. NO I NO NO NO N:JI
4/07/88* 426270 3MD!.. SMD!.. SMDLI NO 3~CL NO I ~D SMI;:" NO! ~D ND ND NO I
KEY
------------------------
blank space - not, applicable
--- - indicates not sampled
NO - none detected
A - 1,1-0ich10roe~hene
3 - 1,l,l-1'richloroe~hane
C - Trichloroethene
D - Tetrachlor.:thene !~ ~ +C'/
Issue Oa~e: .:> I~/p~ \J.- C+j4A; ~
I / . I: / I
l../ ,;
G>
".
000 15 <1
-------
".aver
s~ry at Analytical Oa~a !ar ~am..~ic ~.ll.
All canc.n~racian. uq/l. par~. p.r Qil::or.. ppb.
Analy... by ePA m.c~a4. 601 an4 602. OR 624 1:r.4ic.~.4
SaJ!\pU:lq
:lat.
RAil S...ph Tap
A
a
----------------------------------
1/12/15
5121/86'
1/20116'
11/20/16'
2110117'
51 4/17'
7/27/17'
10/20/17'
1111/17'
416111'
!lEY
------------------------
!II)
!II)
!II)
!II)
!II)
!II)
!II)
!II)
!II)
!II)
!II)
!II)
!II)
!II)
!II)
!II)
!II)
!II)
!II)
ND
~ - ~on8 d.~.c~ed
A - crana-l,2-01chloro8thene
3 - !riChloro.t~ene
~ - l,l,l-!r1chlcroe~ha . ~
. ruu. Oau: sf.. rf
,.
QY 'J.
c
!II)
!II)'
!II)
!II)
!II)
!II)
!II)
!II)'
HD
HD
~~
v
l:;
00015.8
-------
:i~:le / Eddinger
Summary of Analy:ical Da~a :~r :cmes:ic Well.
All cor.cen~=ations ug/l" par':.s per oillion, ppb.
Analyses by EPA methods 601 a~d 6Q2, OR 624 (indicated ~y "').
RAW Sample Tap
Sampling
Date
A
B
----------------------------------
8/14/85
5/22/86'"
8/20/86'"
11/20/86*
2/16/87*
5/ 8/87'"
8/ 4/87*
10/27/87*
1/23/88'"
4/18/88'"
KEY
ND
ND
NO
BMOL
ND
ND
NO
NO
ND
ND
ND.
. NO
ND
BMOL
ND
ND
BMDL
ND
NO
ND
------------------------
NO - ~or.e de~ected
A - Trichloroethene ~
3 - trans-I, 2-0iChlo/rOether.e ~. L ..
Issue Date: S /I~/ Y'f'" S1-. h~~,v . 11
/ I . I f
. ' L/ I
.: ,".
000159
-------
K. ?hi:lios
Su~~ary of A~a:ytical Data for Domestic Well and Carbon System
, All concentrations ug/l. parts per billion, ppb.
Analyses by SPA ~ethods 601 and 602. OR 624 (indicated by *).
MID A samples refer to between primary and secondary tanks. .
RAW I
Sample Tap I
Sampling Total - I
Date Gallons ABC D I
-------------------------------~--------I
8/14/85 16 '3 1 2 I
10/ 7/85 16 3 1 ND I
4/21/86 ,6736 I
5/21/86* 10884 30 BMDL ND ND I
8/21/86* 23678 20 BMDL ND ND I
11/20/86* 35040 10 BMDL ND ND I
2/10/87* 44180 30 BMDL ND ND I
5/14/87* 53810 20 3MDL ~O NO I
8/ 4/87* 98990 20 B~~L ND ND I
10/26/87* 120180 10 ND NO NO I
1/18/88* 129300 10 ND ~O NO I
4/6/88* 136390 20 3MDL ND ND I
KEY
------------------------
blank space - not applicable
--- - indicates not sampled,
ND - none detected
A - Trichloroethene
B - trans-1,2,-Dichloroethene
C - Chloroform
D - Dibromochloro eth~ne
Issue Date:
;Lf-; ;'
. /,
/ '
/
MID A
Sample Tap
I
I
I
ABC D I
--------------------1
I
1
NDI
NDI
NDI
NDI
NDI
:-.IDI
NDI
NDI
NDI
:-.IDI
ND
ND
ND
BMDL
NO
ND
ND
ND
:-.ID
ND
ND
ND
ND
--ND
ND
ND
NO
NO
NO
NO
ND
NO
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
NO
ND
AFTER CARBON
Sample Tap
I
I
I
ABC D I
--------------------1
I
I
NO I
NDI
NDI
NDI
NDI
NDI
NDI
NDI
NDI
NDI
ND
:-.ID
NO
BMDL
ND
ND
ND
:-.ID
:-.10
:-.10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND'
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
000160
-------
G. Epps
Summary of Analytical Data for Domestic Well and Carbon System
All concentrations ug/l. parts per billion. ppb
Analyses by EPA methods 601 and 602. OR 624 (indicated by *) .
MID A samples refer to between primary and secondary tanks.
RB - indicates first sampling performed following rebedding.
RAW I MID A 1 AFTER CARBON 1
Sample Tapl Sample Ta~ 1 S~mple Tap I
Sampling Total I 1 1
Date Gallons A B I A B 'I A B 1
----------------------------1 -------------1 --------------1
I 1 1
08/14/85 3 121 1 1
10/03/85 4 15/ I I
1/27/86 1467 ---I ND ND 1 ND ND I
5/22186* 42722 BMDL 201 ND ND I ND ND 'I
8121/86* 102597 9MDL 101 ND ND I ND ND I
11120/86* 138470 9MDL 101 ND ND I ND ND 1
2110/87* 169689 BMDL 101 NO NO I NO NO I
51 4/87* 199706 NO 9MDLI NO 3MDL I NO NO 1
7/27/87* 236950 NO BMDLI NO 10 I NO NO 1
RB 8/18/87* 244800 ---I NO NO I I
10/20/87* 268060 BMDL BMDL I NO NO I NO. NO I
1/11/88* 295250 NO 3MDLI NO NO I NO NO I
4/15/88* 330870 NO BMDLI NO 3MDL 1 NO NO 1
KEY Rebed Gallon
---------------------- Date Reading
blank space - not applicable ---------------------
--- - indicates not sampled 8/17/87 244500
NO - none detected
A - 1.1-Dichloroethene
B - 1.1. I-T'iChl~"~,"ane?r '"" L:2b---
Issue Date: 1/~/7/ ,,~ ,;,
L/
- .
000161
-------
C. Fisher / A. Hawkes
Summary of Analy~ical Oa~a for Domestic Well and Carbon Sys~em
All. concen~ra~ions ug/l.par~s per billion.ppb
Analyses by EPA methods 601 and 602. OR 624 (indicated by *) .
MID A samples refer to be~ween primary and secondary ~anks.
RAW I MID A I AFTER CARBON I
Sample Tapl Sample Tap I Sample Tap I
Sampling Total I -I I
Date Gallons ABC I A B, C I- ABC I
---------------------------------1, ---------------1 ---------------1
9/12195 1 2 41 I I
10/ 7/95' i 2 41 I I
4/ 7/96 16361 ---I ND NO NDI ND ND NDI
5/22196. 27445 NO ND BMDLI NO NO 1'101 NO NO 1'101
9/20/96. 59000 NO NO BMDLI NO ND NDI ND NO NO I
11/20/96. 103050 BMDL NO BMDLI NO NO NO I NO NO NO I
2110/97. 162369 BMDL NO NO I ND NO 1'10'1 NO NO NO I
5/ 4/97" 207359 BMDLNO BMDLI ND ND NOI NO NO 1'101
7/27/97" 226930 ND NO BMDLI ND NO NO I NO NO NDI
10/20/97" 257250 ND NO BMDLI ND ND 9MDLI NO NO NDI
1/11/99" 294650 ND NO BMDLI NO NO 3MDLI NO NO NO I
4/1/88" 302680 NO NO 1'101 NO NO 1'101 NO NO NOI
KEY
------------------------
, "
blank space - np~ applicable
--- - indica~es no~ sampled
NO - none detected
A - trans-1.2-Dichloroethene
B - 1.1-0ichloroethene
C - 1,1.1-rrichlJroe}hane
Issue Date,: Si /J/ ? r \,
Jk7c:r
"
000162
-------
O. Lowrey - S1;n of the Bear Apart..enu
Summary of Analytical Oata for Oo..e.tic well an~ C.rcon Sy.te..
All concentration. uq/l. part. per billion. ppb.
An.ly.e. by erA ..ethod. 601 .n~ 602. OR 624 (indic.ted by "J.
MID A .ample. reter ~a beCv..n primAry ~nQ .econdary ~Anx.. left hand train a. you Caee the .y.tam.
MID 8 .&Sple. reter to betw..n primery and ..condary tanx.. r1qht hand train a8 you tace the .y.t...
RA.
Saaple Tap I MID A I PlID 8 I AFTER CAR80N I
saapl1nq Total - - I Saapllnq Tap I SAJllpl1nq Tap I Saapl1nq Tap I
Cat. Callon. II 8 C D B I II 8 C 0 I A 8 C D I II 8 C 0 e I
----------------------------------------------1 --------------------1 --------------------1 -------------------------1
1/13/85 16 20 1 2 NO I L I I
101 4/85 2 3 NO .NO NO I I I I
3/ 3/16 10125 t NO NO NO NOI NO ND ND NDI ND NO ND ND NDI
5/22/86" 45740 NO BMDL NO BMDL ND I ND ND ND NDI ND ND ND NDt NO !ID ND NO !ID I
1/20/16" NO ND ND BMDL ND I NIl NIl ND NDI ND ND ND HDI ND NIl HD NIl 111:)1
11/21/16" 1342'0 NIl ND ND ND ND , ND ND NO NDI ND ND ND NDt ND NIl NIl ND NDt
2/18/87" 171130 NIl BMDL ND BMDL BMDL I NIl NIl NO NDt ND ND He NDt ND !ID ND NIl NDI
5/ 1/17" 221160 ND ND ND ND HD I NIl HD HD HDI ND ND ND HDI ND ND ND ND HDI
1/ 4/87" 20450- BMDL BMDL ND BMDL BMDL t ND ND ND !lDt ND ND ND NDI ND NO NO ND NDI
10/27/87" 301350 NO HD ND BMDL NO I ND ND ND HDt ND ND ND NDI ND NO ND ND NDt
1/11"'. 306330 HD BMDL ND BMD L ND I ND ND ND !lDt HD ND ND NDI He !ID ND HD NDI
4/15/11" 400010 !ID ND ND BMD L ND I ND ND ND Nel He ND HD NDt He HD ND HD NDt
~y
------------------------
blank 'pAce - not ~ppliCAbl.
--- - indiCAt.. not .Ampled
NO - non. cetacted
A - Trichloroethen.
e - tran.-l.2,-Olchloro8thene
C - 1.1-Dichloroeth.ne
e - l~l.l-~rlchloro.th.n. ~
e - 1.1-Olchloro8t ene /
"."0 ,.,,, £ZJI?0-~i '7J
/ / .! .' I'
. L- / i
. .
000163
. .
-------
MID A samples refer
MID B samples refer
Rev.Munz 1 Centennial Evangelical Lutheran Church
Summary of Analytical Data for Domestic Well and Carbon System
All concentrations ugll, parts per billion, ppb.
Analyses by EPA methods 601 and 602, OR 624 (indicated by -).
to between primary and secondary tanks, left hand train as you face the system.
to between primary and secondary tanks, right hand train as you face the system.
I
RAW I MID A I MID B I AFTER I
Sample Tap I Sample Tap I Sample Tap 1 CARBON Tapl
Sampling Total -I -I -I -I
Date Gallons A B 1 A B I A B I A B I
------------------------------~--I -------------";'-1 ---";'---~-------I ---------------1
8/13/85 6 28 I 1 1 1
101 3185 7 25 I 1 1 1
1/17/86 1222 1 ND ~D I ~D ~D 1 ~D ND 1
5/21/86- 58350 BMDL 20 I ~D ~D I ~D ~D I ~D ND I
8/21/86* 96932 BMDL 20 I ~D ~D I ~D ND I ND ND 1
11/21/86* 138360 BMDL 10 1 ND ND I ND ~D I ND ND 1
-2110/87* 177265 BMDL 20 I ND ND I ND ND I ND ND I
51 4/87* 212510 BMDL 10 I ND ND I ~D ND 1 ND ~D 1
7/27/87* 252540 3MDL 10 I ND ND I ~D BMDL I ~D ND 1
10120/87* 288630 BMDL 10 I ND 3~.DL I ND 3MDL I ND ND I
1/11/88* 324100 ND 10 1 ND 3MDL 1 ND 3MDL I ND ND I
4/08/88* 361480 ND 10 I ND 3MDL I ND 3MDL I ND ND I
KEY
------------------------
blank space - not applicable
--- - indicates not sampled
ND - none detected
A - 1.l-Dichloroethene
3 - l,l,l-Trichloroethane
Issue Date: ~~Dl;l~~
I /
~4
000164
-------
. E. iUttenbaugh
Summary of Analytical Data for Domestic Well and Carbon System
All concentrations uq/l. parts per billion. ppb.
Analyses by EPA methods 601 and 602. OR 624 (indicated by -).
MIO A samples refer to between primary and secondary tanks.
RAW I MIO A I AFTER CARBON I
Sample Tl,p I Sample Tap I Sample Tap I
Sampling Total I I -I
Date Gallons A B C I A B C 1 A B C I
-----------------------------------1 ---------------1 ------------------1
8/13/85 2 10 NO 1 I I
10/ 7/85 3 10 NO I I I
2/ 3/85 1777 1 NO NO NDI ND. ND NO I
5/22/86- 20204 BMDLBMDL ND 1 NO NO NO 1 NO NO NO I
8/21/86- "39576 NO BMDL ND I ND ND NO 1 NO NO NO I
11/20/86* 52970 ND BMDL ND I NO NO aMDLI NO ND NO 1
2/16/87* 66750 ND BMDL NO I NO ND NO I NO NO NO 1
5/15/87" 80810 NO 'SMDL NO I ND NO 10101 NO ND NO 1
7/27/87- 100220 ND BMDL NO I ND ND BMDLI ND ND ND 1
10/26/87* 117670 NO BMDL ND I ND ND ' ND I ND ND ND I
In8/88- 134920 ND BMDL ND I ND BMDL NDI ND ND ND I
417/88- 143470 ND BMDL ND I ND BMDL NDI ND ND ND I
EY
------------------------
~lank space - not applicable
--- - indicates not sampled
~D - none detected
A - l.l-Dichloroethene
3 - l.l.l-Trichloroethane ].
c: - Trichloroe~hene Q '/) .
Iss\;e Date: ~i;;k?." :J;~
:./ / I'
t
D
000165
-------
MID A ._1'1"
'" to 8 ..1'1"
I. 81.an8 .. K.l.aMl't.on A800D
JU88ary ot Al'lalyt.1cal ~t.a tor Oc8..uc -11 and CartJon 5yat.
All canceat.ru1on8 \J.Q/1* puu per bl1l1O.ft. pptt.
Anal,... by tlA ..hDci8 601 &M 602. CI U4 U.ncL1C8te4 by".
c.t.r toO bec._n 5)1' wary.... MODndaI'y t.&A):.. 1.tt hand. tra1Jl ... )"Ou "aC8 the .yac.a..
retv t.o _c._n pt'18UY and. ..aon4&ry t..ani:a. r1Qht i\aIId. t.r&1n .. yO\l face tJ\e .yat..
U - 1,",1oaC... t'1rac. ..pli.n, tol108'1.nq re.....1.nq.
I I I -
.... _.18 T,. I MIO A I_pl. Tap I MIO I _.18 T,. ' ~. ~_.~1~ ~~
_11"" '1'0..1 - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - I - - - - - - - - 1 - -
Dece (;&110" A 8 C 0 131 A 8 C & r 13 I " 8 C. 0 I r 131 " 1 C . r 13
t I ------------1 ----------------
"'12'" 700 140 11 8D 8D 1 41 I I
10IZt/85. 700 1000 10 III 8D III 101 I I
11/22'"' 700 340 410 , , 2 2 801 8D lID 10 10 10 101 - -- --I 10 10 10 ID ' 10 ID
2/11/1' ]]10 J70 700 I 4 I 1 101 8D lID 80 lID 80 lID I IJ 10 8D ID ID 801 -- -- --
J 1 J/" JIU -- -- - - --I -- - -- -- --I -- -- --I ID 10 8D 10 ID 10 ID
5/22/1'. nu J70 no _L 8C1o 10 IID..,L I 8D IIM)L .. 10 lID 80 101 IIM)L 8mL 10 10 80 lID 101 10 10 ID 10 10 10 10
1/20/". 10tIG J70 530 BICIL lID 10 lID BICILI 8D!IIC)L 10' 10 10 ' 10 lID I 10 20 10 10 10 lID IDI ID 10 lID 10 lID 10 ID
:.lIZO/I'. 21210 220 JIO IYCL 8CL 10 ID IIM)LI 10 IIM)L 8D 10 8D 10 '101 IIM)L 20 10 ID 80 ID ""' lID 10 10 10 10 10 lID
U 12IZ"I,- 2t21O -- -- -- -- -- -- --, III 10 10 10 10 10 lID I ID 8mL 10 lID 10 lID 10' -- -- -
Zl10/11- I"M 100 500 10 ID 10 10 101 8m!. IIM)L 8D 10 10 10 lID I IIM)L 8mL 10 lID 10 10 101 lID '0 8D 10 10 10 lID
51 "11- JlllO 200 tOO 8ICJL 8D 80 10 8MDLI 8mL 10 8D 10 10 10 101 10 40 10 10 ID lID 101 10 10 8D 10 10 10 lID
... $/22/"- tOIOO - -- - -- -- - -I 10 80 lID 10 10 10 101 10 10 10 8D 10 lID 101 -- - --
"' ./11- t,,70 270 t ZO "'1. IMDL 8D lID 118)1. I 8D 10 1111 10 lID 10 101 IIM)L 10 10 10 10 10 101 8D 10 8D 10 lID 10 1111
... 1/14/11- . "00 - - -- -- - - -I _L_L 10 10 10 10 101 1IC)1. IIIIDL 10 10 10 10 101 -- - --
10IZI/"- . .'130 '..D ..ND '''D "'110 "110 '.'80 ...DI 8D 10 ID 10 ID 10 101 10 ID 10 10 10 ID 101 lID 10 ID 10 10 10 lID
1/1""- nllO 170 !to IIC)L ID 10 10 101 8D 10 10 10 ID ID 101 10 ID ID lID ID 10 101 III) 10 10 10 10 10 lID
.1'1"- 51700 310 5408MDL ID 10 IID8MDLI ID 10 181 10 lID 10 11111 10 ID 10 8D 10 10 101 10 10 10 10 lID 10 ID
II." ... <:.&11<0.
-------- DIU -.u""
Blana 8p8G8 - !"lOt. 8;lp11aaa18
-- - 1.ntiJ,cat.8. noe. MllplM
110 - non. ci8t.acc.-
A. - 'l'r lcAJ,orOl8c.h....
I - u8ll8-l* 2. -01cAloraec.h8ft8
C - 1* 1-01chlol"08't.2Wne
o - 1. Z-01dllo.roec.h&ne
& - 1. Z-D1cAloroozapan.
: : t~n:::::::-- ;t. zp
.. - ......IY818 1"
-------
W. N. Marchionne
Summary of Analyeical Data for Domestic Well and Carbon Syseem
All conceneraeions ug/l, pares per billion, ppb.
Analyses by EPA methods 601 and 602, OR 624 (indicaeed by -).
MID A samples refer Co bee ween primary and secondary eanks.
RAW I MID A I AFTER CARBON I
Sample Tapl Sample Tapl Sample Tap I
Sampling Total - I - I I
Dace Gallons A .S I A S 1 A S I
----------------------------1 ----------1 --------------------1
8/13/85 2 91 I I
10/ 4/85 2 111 I I
2117/86 2040 ---I ND NDI ND ND I
5/21/86* .17907 ND SMDLI ND NDI ND ND I
8/21/86* 33805 ND BMDLI ND NDI ND ND I
11/21/86* 49252 ND 3MDLI ND NDI ND ND I
2110/87- 62361 ND BMDLI ND NDI ND ND 1
5/ 8/87* 77230 ND SMDLI ND NDI ND ND I
8/ 4/87* 91260 ND SMeLl ND NDI ND ND I ..
~0/26/87* 105790 ND BMDLI ND NDI ND ND I
1/18/88* .120700 ND BMDLI ND NDI ND ND I
4/6/88- 133970 ND BMDLI ND NDI ND ND I
KEY
------------------------
blank space - not applicable
--- - indicates noe sampled
ND - none deeeceed
A - l.l-Dichloroethene
B - 1,1, 1-Tdch1"o~}hane ~ ~ / ~
-/ /-y /
Issue Date: ,.5 ./~/ -f., ,':t .../1cL
-------
KID A .."'pl..
KID 8 .ample.
K. I.uclvick
summary o! An~ly~i~l DACA for Oo",e.clc .ell oncl CArbon Sy.tem
All concencracion. uql1, parca per bl11ion, ppb.
Analy.e. by erA ",ecaOcl. 601 Ancl 602, OR 624 (inclicacecl by "I.
reter ~o b.~w..n pr~&ry and .8candary tank., lett hand train .8 you !ac8 the sYI~.m.
reter ~o b8~w..n prLmAry and .8conaary tank., riqht hand train .a you face the .y.t8m.
R8 - lnclicaCe. !ir.t .ampllnq per!ormecl !ollovlnq rebeclclinq.
RAIl I MID A I MID 8 I
Sample Tap I Sample Tap I Sample Tap I
supl1nq Tot.l I - I - 1
OUe ~llon. A 8 C D B r CO I A 8 C 0 B I A 8 C 0 B I
--------------------------------------------------------1 -------------------------1 -------------------------1
1/13/85 690 700 12 3 2 HD NOI I I
III 7/15 431 620 590 NO NO NO NO NOI I I
11/27115 2313 ---I 2 4 NO HD NOI 7 10 NO NO NOI
1/ 3/86 5144 ---I 2 4 NO NO NOI 9 13 NO NO NOI
1/27/16 6952 ---I 2 4 NO HD NOI 5 9 NO NO NOI
5/21/16' 16095 690 670 10 HD!!MDL!!MDL !!MDLI BMDL BMDL HD NO NOI BMDL 20 HD HD NOI
1/21/86' 23511 610 710 10 lID BMD L NO BMDLI NO BMDL NO NO NOI BMDL 20 HD HD 1101
11/20/86' 30670 570 "0 10 ND HD HD !!MDLI NO 10 NO ND NOI IIIIDL 20 NO NO NOI
RB 12123/86' 33242 ---I NO NO NO NO NOI ND NO NO NO NOI
2110/87' 37011 550 610 BMDL ND NO HD NOI NO NO NO 110 NOI NO NO NO NO NOI
51 1117' 44030 570 650 BMDL HD ND lID NOI NO BMD L HD HD NOI HD !!HI) L HD NO HDI
II 4/87' 52240 590 100 10 !!MD L!!MDL NO NOI NO BMDL NO HD NOI ND !!HI) L NO NO NOI
10/26117' 59660 570 760 NO 110 HD liD HDI NO!!MDL NO HD HDI HD !!MD L HD HD NOI
1/11/11' 67720 690 770 BMDL 1I0!!MDL liD HDI BMDL 20 NO NO NOI !!HI)L 20 HD HD NOI
;US 211"11' 70560 ---I HD NO NO HD NOI NO NO NO HD HDI
416/11' 75520 630 650 BMDL liD liD NO HDI NO !!MD L HD HD NDI HD !!HI) L HD HD HDI
gy
Al'TZII CARBClN 1
Sample Tap I
1
A 8 C D B r CO 1
-----------------------------------1
I
NO NO NO ND HD lID lID I
HD NO NO HD lID NO lID I
I NO ND HD NO lID NO I
lID NO NO liD NO lID HD I
NO HD NO HD HD HD NO I
HD HD NO ND 110 110 lID 1
HD NO NO NO HD lID HDI
---I
NO HD HD HD HD lID lID I
HD NO HD HD 110 HD HD I
NO HD !I'D HD 110 HD HD I
!I'D 1ID HD 110 110 HD HDI
HD !I'D 110 110 HO 110 110 I
---I
110 110 110 110 110 110 1101
------------------------
Dat..
RUclinq
blAnk 'p~ce - noC opplic~b1e
--- - indicat.. not J&mpled
ND - non. detected
A - Tri~~!oro.th.n.
9 - trans-l,l,-D1cnloro8thene
C - I,I-Olchloroecaene
o - l,2-01chloroprop.ne
B - l,l,I-Trlchloroeth~ne
~ - Vinyl Chloride
e; - 1.2-Dlchlo oeca e .
;l, r/
---------------------
12/22/86
2/15/88
33110
70440
:..U8 Cat.:
'/\ I cL-
~7kf
000168
-------
.j
~:.r.nc. Mil.on , 50n.
summary ot Analy~lcal ~a~a tor Oom..~ic ..11 .n~ Carbon SY.~8M
All conc.n~ration. uq/l. ~rt. per billion. ppb.
Analy... by EPA m.t~o~. 601 an~ 602. OR 624 lin~icat.~ by ').
reter ~o b.~w..n pr~mAry an~ .econdary ~&n.., lert hand train al you !aC8 the .v.tam.
reter to between primAry ana .8condary tank., r1qht nand train AI you race the .y.taa.
R8 - in~CAt.. tir.t .ampl1nq p.rtorme~ tollovinq rlbe~~1nq
HID A 'AmPl..
HID B .AmPl..
RAIl 1
Sample hp 1
Suapllnq Tatal - 1
Oac.. Gallan. A B C 0 r; 'i CO K 1
----------------------------------------------------------1
'/13/15 130 130 3 7 !fO IfD IfD IfDI
1l/22/15 2Z50 ---I
12/13/15 8675 ---,
1/27/85 266'9 ---I
5/21/86' 77083 100 100 BHDL BHDL BKDL BHDL BHDL BHDLI
8121/'6* 117840 130 140 BHDL BHDL IfD IfD IfD IfD 1
ll/ZO/86* 154986 110 140 BHDL BHDL NO NO NO IfD 1
2/16/87* 188274 120 140 BHDL BKDL NO !fO IfD NO 1
R8 3/02/.7* 193600 ---I
5/ 4117* 217400 110 120 IfD BHD L NO NO NO NOI
7/27/17* 247880 110 21 0 BHDL BHDL !fO NO NO NO 1
10/Z0/87* 274410 140 110 BHDL BHDL NO NO NO NO 1
1/11/". 30Z1I0 90 120 111) BHDL Np NO 111) NO 1
R8 1/29188' 3010Z0' ---I
4/6/88* 3J3610 IZO 140 NO BHD L IfIJ IfIJ 111) IfIJI
!':Ey
------------------------
R.be~
Dac..
~l.nx .pace - ~ot applic&Dle
--- - indicat.e. not sampled
NU - non. d.t.~.4
A - Trichloroethene
e - tran.-l,2,-Olchloroethene
C - 1,1-Clchloro8thene
~ - 1, 1,1, -rrichloroec.nane
! - Chloromethane
:- - Brom0JD8t..t\ane
~ - Vinyl Chlori~. /"""'\ - .--......, c-/
iI - Chloro.thln~ h . ) . \7 z-
: nUl Oat.: Si/,..l P.r 2/ .L' e-/.j
I I j'
HID A 1 MID B I A'iTU CARBO" I
Slapl. Tapt SuqUl TIp 1 Sample Tap I
- 1 -I - 1
A B 1 A 8 0 1 A B C 0 r;' 'i CO K I
----------1 --------'------1 ------------~---------------------------I
I 1 I.
NO NOI HtI NO Htli HtI HtI HtI NO NO HtI NO Htli
HtI 111)1 IfD NO Htli NO HtI NO NO HtI HtI HtI IfIJI
IfIJ 11 80 NO Htli HtI HtI HtI 111) NO NO HtI Htli
NO Htli HtI NO Htli NO NO HtI HtI HtI NO NO NOI
NO BHD L 1 BHDL BHDL NOI 111) HtI NO HtI 111) NO NO Htli
NO 111)1 NO BHDL NOI 111) NO NO NO NO 111) HtI NOI
NO 201 120 130 BHD L 1 NO HtI NO NO HtI NO NO NO 1
111) 111)1 111) NO NOI ---I
NO 111)1 111) NO NO 1 NO 111) 111) NO NO NO IfIJ IfIJI
111) BHD L I 111) 1ft) NOI NO NO 1ft) 1ft) 1ft) IfIJ NO 801
1ft) BHDLI NO !1M!) L !1M!) L I NO 111) NO 1ft) 1ft) 1ft) IfIJ !f1)1
111) 301 HtI BHDL NOI NO HtI NO NO HtI IfIJ 111)' ~ IfIJ 1
IfIJ NOI !1M!) L NO NOI .._-j
IfIJ NO 1 HtI 111) Ift)! HtI 111) NO HtI IfIJ IfIJ IfIJ IfIJI
CAll on
~...c1.1.nq
31 '2117
1/28/88
----------------------
1934 70
307600
O'b0169
-------
~. ~or~n - ~auqer. Kardware
s~ry 0: ~~.:I~ical :.~& for Oom..~ic .e11 and C.r~Qn Sy.~am
All concen~:a~ion5 ~q/l, pAr~J per billion, ppb.
Anoly.e. by ePA ~ethod. 601 and 602. OR 624 (indicated by "I.
reter to b8~veen prL~ry and .econaary tan~J, left hand ~r.in a. you face ~ne .y.~.m.
refer :0 be~ween pr:~ary .r.a secondary tanxJ, riqht nand ~rain a. you face ~ne Jys~em.
~8 - indica~.s ~~. firs~ .~plinq perforMed followinq.rebeddinq.
RAW Soaple 'I'op I
Soapl1nq 'I'otol -I
Dote G.Uon ABC 0 e I I
---------------------------------------------------1
1/12/85 610 660 !II) !II) HO !II) I
10/14/85 700 610 13 2 HO HOI
11/14/85 2430 no 460 12 2 2 NOI
11/27/15 6355 ---I
:1/27/15 6365 ---,
11/27/15 6375 ---I
12/06/15 1596 ---I
12/13/15 9500 ---I
:2/20/15 10650 ---I
12/27115 11130 ---I
11 3/16 14001 ---I
1/10/16 15691 ---I
1/17/16 :7116 ---I
1/27/16 :9467 ---I
21 3/16 21012 ---,
2/10/16 22320 ---,
2/17/16 22920 ---,
2/24/16 25133
31 3/16 26556
3/10/16 21155
3/:7/16 29515
3/24/16 32252
3/31/16 33670
41 7/16 35497
4/14/16 36958 ---
4/21/16 31941
4/21/16 42020
5/12/16 46837
5/22/86" 4"05 660 650
6/ 3/16 52810
6/:6/86 56573
11 7/16 62677
7/21/86 66553
8/ 4/16 70370
~ 1125/16" 77550
::/20/86" 100400
2110/87" :10'835
~a 3/ 2/17" 122650
~ 13/27/87" 121910
1~~2;~:~: ~:~~:: ::: :~:
~s - ./1.1.,- 173150
10/20/17" :'0790 710 180
RB 1~/04/"- 19'540
:/11/11* 221230 560 580 10 YO
~ 4/06/11* 257710 500 600 !II) HD
HID A .amDl..
MID B ....pin
---
10
710
450
520
690
640
590
10 !fI)
10 BMDL
10 'BMDL
10 aHDL
10 BMDL
20 BMDL BMDL
~"(
------------------------
biank .p.ce - not appliCAble
--- - lndica~e. no~ sAmpled
YD - non. aetected
A - !richlorQ.~hene
3 ~ran.-l,2,-Dichloroethene
C - 1,1-01chloroethene
~ - 1,2-01chloroeth.ne
e - 1,2-0ichlcropropane
F - Methylene Chloride
e; - -:'01a8n.
H - retracnloroethene
I - 1.1.1-T:;_~10:;e;~
:soue OHe: ~//I ?
IfD
Nv
MID A
s...ple Tap
---I
-.-- i
--_1
I
I
A B G H I
--------------------,
., 1
I
!fI)1
!II) ~
!fI)1
lID I
!II) I
lID I
!fI)1
!fI)1
lID I
!fI)1
!fI)1
lID I
YOI
lID I
11
11
!fI)1
K171
If 0 I
KOI
KOI
KOI
If 0 I
NOI
If 0 I
IfDI
1/01
!fI)1
!ID I
!fI)1
!fI)1
!ID I
!ID I
!fI)1
!fI)1
YOI
!fI)1
!fI)1
!fI)1
!fI)1
!fI)1
If 0 I
!fI)1
If 0 I
If 0
Kv
Nv
KD
KD
KD
ND
---I
-~-I
---I
---I
---I
---I
---t
NDI
---I
2 !II)
2 lID
!fI) lID
lID lID
2 !ID
2 HD
2 lID
2 !II)
3 lID
, lID
4 !fI)
4 YO
6 !ID
4 2
4 !fI)
!fI) 4 !fI)
YO 4 !fD
KD 5 !fD
3 , !fI)
~D 4 NO
KD 6 KD
If 0 6 IfD
KO 4 !fI)
!fI) 8 !ID
3 10 !fD
1/D 6 !fD
KO BMDL !fI)
If 0 1 !ID
2 , KD
1 10 ND
4 13 !fI)
8 !fI)
YO !ID IfD
Kv 3MDL YO
NO 9HDL !ID
KD !fD ND
HO 3MDL !ID
YO 3MDL !fI)
IfD 10 !fI)
KD BMDL !fI)
KD BI
-------
M!D A samples
M!D a samples
>.I. ~ooney
Summary of Ana:y~~cal Oa~a for Oomes~~c Well ana Carbon Sys~em
All concen~ra~:ons ug/l, par:s per bl11lon, ppb.
Analyses by ~?A ~ethoas 601 and 602, OR 624 (lnalcatea by *).
refer ~o be~ween pr~mary ana secondary tanks, left hand ~rain as you face the system.
refer ~o between prlmary ana secondary ~an~s, right hand train as you face the sys~em.
Ra - indicates firs~ sampling performea followlng rebedding.
RAW I M!D A ! MID a 1 AFTER CARBON I
Suq:»le Tapl Sample Tapi Sample Tapl Sample Tap I
Sampling Total - I - I - I -I
Oate Gallon8 A a I A a I A a I A a I
-------------------------------1 ---------1 . ---------- 1 ------------1
12/27/85 4020 20 4601 YD 11 YD 61 ND ND 1
1/ 3/86 9047 --I NO NDI NO NDJ NO ND 1
1/21/86 21001 ---I NO 11 ND 11 NO NO. I
2/19/86 32177 ---I NO 21 NO 41 NO ND I
3/ 3/86 37540 ---I NO 21 NO 31 YO ND 1
3/10/86 40011 ---I YO 21 NO 31 NO Nt) 1
3/11/86 44019 ---I YO 31 ND 31 NO NO 1
3/24/86 47482 ---I YO 31 NO 31. NO NO ,
3/31/86 50666 ---I NO 51 NO 131 NO ND I
4/14/86 58074 ---I YO 61 NO 71 YO ND 1
4/21/86 61673 ---I NO 61 NO 71 YO ND 1
4128/86 65255 ---I ND 41 NO 51 NO NO 1
5/ 5/86 70420 ---I NO 81 NO 51 NO NO 1
5/22/86* 78156 110 12001 NO 3MDLI NO SMDLI NO NO 1
6/ 9/86 ---I NO 81 YO 101 NO NO 1
6/30/86 94484 ---I NO 111 NO 131' NO NO 1
7/14/86 100719 ---I NO 171 NO 171 NO ND 1
7/28/86 107363 ---I NO 281 NO 151 NO Nt) 1
8/11/86 113265 ---I NO 211 NO 251 NO NO 1
"a 8125/86* 120270 100 18001 NO 3M0LI NO SMDLI NO NO 1
11/26/86* 159190 50 7601 NO :01 NO 101 NO Nt) 1
Ra 12/23/86* 170110 ---I NO NDI NO NO I 1
2118/87* 194730 50 6601 NO 3I'!OLI 'NO 3M0LI NO Nt) f'
5/ 8/87* 226030 * 80 1400 I NO 3M0LI NO aMDLI NO NO 1
7121/87* 227540 160 25001 NO 301 NO 201 **120**1700 1
"a 8/11/87* (l) 140 ---'I NO 201 NO SMDL 1 1
"a 9/ 2187* 6340 ---I NO 3MOLI NO SI'.D L 1 1
10/26/87* 24640 130 21001 NO aMDLI NO SMDLI NO NO 1
1/18/88* 42640 70 9601 NO ~Ol NO 101 NO '3MDLI
<'.B 2116/88* 214250 ---I NO ~ID I NO 101 1
<'.B 3/9/88* 222960 ---I NO 3MDLI NO 191 1
RB 3/31/88* 232110 ---I ---I NO 3MDLI NO Nt) 1
4/15/88* 236660 80 12001 NO 101 NO 3MDLI NO Nt) 1
!(£y
-----------------------
"ebed
Date
Gallon
Reading
'ank space - not applicable --------------------
.- - lnaicates not sampled 8/19/86 117800
,0 - none aetectea 12/22/86 169600
.. - results inalcate an analytical 8/14/87 (1) 0
aiscrepancy from an unaetermined error~
(1) - A new water meter was 9/ 1/87
lnstallea with 150980 gallons 2/15/88
already recorded. 3/ 8/88
A - Trichloroethene 3/30/88
Iss:e -o:::~s-?//-:~~~~7eth~ .])~ J~vr;;7
/' {, /
5150
213720
222360
231710
00017J.
-------
, J. E!!qen
I ~cal Da~a for Domes~~c Well and Car~on Sys~em
~ All concen~ra~~ons uq/l, pa~S per b1.11~on, ppb.
I Analyses by E?A 601 and 602, OR 624 (1.nd1.ca~ed by *).
and secondary ~anks, lef~ hand ~ra1.n as you face ~he sys~em.
and secondary tanks, r1.qht hand ~ra1.n as you face the sys~em.
.rst samplinq performed followinq rebeddinq.
MID A MID B
sample Tap I sample Tap I AFTER CARBON Sample Tap 1
- -I -I -I -1
F I A B F I A B 1 A a C D E F I
----I --------------1 ---------------1 ---------------------------------1
NDI 1 .1. I
---I ND ND NOI NO 1 .1 NO 2 NO ND NO 3 1
---I 2 6 NOI 2 NO 1 NO NO NO NO NO 2 1
NOI NO 10 NOI NO 10 NO NO NO NO NO ND I
NDI NO aMDL NOI BMDL 10 NO NO NO NO NO BMDL I
NOI BMDL 20 NOI 10 30 NO NO NO NO NO NO I
---I NO Nt) NOI NO NO I
NOI NO aMDL NO I NO BMDL Nt) NO NO NO NO ND I
NO I NO SHOL NOI NO BMDL Nt) NO NO NO NO Nt) I
NO I NO aMDL NOI BMDL 10 NO NO NO NO NO NO I
---I NO SMDL NO I NO NO --- 1
NOI NO ND NOI NO NO ND NO NO NO NO ND 1
NO I NO .ND. BMDL I NO ND NO NO NO ND NO ND I
NOI NO NO NO I NO NO ND NO NO ND NO NO 1
Gallon
;
-------
APPENDIX B
-------
~1t.O Sl'4~"
; A 'i
\_i
10), ...41
4( "."..c.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAl PROTECTfON AGENCY
REGION III
&41 Chestnut Building I
Philad~lphia. ~ennsylYania 1910~
RESPONS IVENESS SUMMARY FOR THE
PROPOSED R&~EDlAL ACTION PLAN
AT THE KIMBERTON SUPERFUND SITE
EAST PIKELAND TOWNSHIP, CHESTER COUNTY
PENNSYLVANIA
September 30, 1988
-------
III.
- .~.
RESPONSIVENESS SUMMARY FOR THE
PROPOSED REMEDIAL Al.'TION PLAN
AT THE KIMBERTON SUPERFUND SITE
EAST PIKELAND TOWNSHIP, CHESTER COUNlY
PENNSYLVANIA
Table ot Contents
f. .'.
I.
Introduction
II.
Summary ot. Community Relations Activities
'iVr"i tten CanrnentS'
Attachment I.
Proposed Remedial Action Plan
for the Kllnberton SUperfund Site
-------
1:$4-5£ J~ '!
/- \
/ .
I. IntrodO~tion
The Ki~rton site occupi~ approximately one acre and is located in the
northeastern portion of Chester County in the Village of Kimberton. .
Domesti~ and commercial well\~ater samples have detected high levels of
chlori ' ted hydrocarbon chemi al contamination. A source of this contami-
nation has been identified as the property currently awned by the Monsey
Corpo tion which contained s eral buried lagooQs that were operated by
Cbrporation during the 1950's. An investigation of the site and
further sampling studies have evealed the presence of assorted volatile
organic carpounds. The Kimber on site was added to the Supe.t+;und National
Priorities List (NPL) in 1982.
II.
Summary of Cormrunity Iela ions Activities
A.nurnber of publi~ meetings re conducted during 1981-82 by the Pennsylvania
Department of Environmental Re ources and EPA to discuss the results of
preliminary water sampling and the possible cleanup actions that may be taken.
In cooperation with PADER, and Monsey Products, Inc. conducted
additional public meetings and provided briefings to local officials to inform
them of the site investigation results. In 1985, both companies established
interim water supJ;>lies for 23 families and also provided carbon ,~~~ti~ Cl,i>f7r",/;,,?
systems. In August of 1988, PADER and EPA notif~ed area. residents t at the .
Proposed Remedial Action Plan was available for review/comment by placing an
advertisement in the August 26, 1988 edition of the Chester County Daily Local
News. In addition, the proposed plan was mailed to all citizens in the area
whose names were on the site mailing list. A public meeting to discuss the
Proposed Remedial Action Plan was also offered to area requests. However,
requests for such a meeting were never received.
III.
written Cbmments
Ne i ther PADER nor EPA rece i ved wr i t ten carrnents on the Proposed Remedial
Action Plan for the Kllnberton SUperfund S~t~.
..<,,", :
-------
-- --------------.--- ---
. ' 1timberton SUperfund Site Proposed Iel8Hal Action Plan
Presented by ~lvania Department of EnvirOl'lllE!Dtal Resources
and the tJnited States Enviromental Protection Agency
~~.J.CII
This proposed remedial action plan has been prepared by the Pennsylvania
Department of Envirormental ReSources (PADER) and the United States Environ-
mental Protection. Aqency (EPA) as part of PACER and EPA' s Superfund public'
outreach efforts.' This proposed plan presents actions that PACER and EPA have
considered with regard to public concern related to the K.imberton Site in the
Village of Kimberton, Chester County, Pennsylvania. 'lbese actions were
identified by several Remedial Investigation reports and were evaluated
based on: 1) the extent of the contamination problem at ~'e site, 2) the poten-
tial risks to the public health and the environment and 3) the steps to be
. taken to correct the problem. This ?roposed plan is the first of two operable
units for this site. The first unit, the subject of this ?roposed ?lan, deals
with selection of a remedy ~~at ?rovides a drinking ~ter source for certain
locations. The second alternative operable unit is focusing on elimination/
control of this contamination source.
The proposed plan begins with a brief history of ~~e Kimberton site,
followed by a surmary of each of the ranedial alternatives PADER and EPA have
considered for dealing with the groundwater contamination at this site, PACER's
and EPA's rationale for reconm~ing and, in sane cases eliminating anyone of
these re-oedial alternatives is inch~ed in each of the sunmaries. In addition,
~~is plan identifies the preliminary decision on a preferred alternative and
explains the rationale for the preference. EPA and PADER are seeking public
ccmnent on these remedial alternatives currently under consideration. At the
conclusion of this proposed plan, a glossary of ter:ms that may be unfamiliar to
the general public is provided.
SITE DFS:RIPrION AND HIS'roaY
The village of Kimberton is located in the northeastern portion of
Chester County, Pennsylvania near ~"e ~iladglphia rtetropoli tan. area. NlInerous
danestic and ccmnercial potable well water supplies have been sampled by ~~e
'. Chester County Health Department and analyzed by PADER since January 1982.
High levels of chlorinated hydrocarbon chemical contamination has been detected
in many of the sampled wells.. A source of this contamination has been id@ntified
as the property currently CM'1ed by the Monsey Corporation which contained several.
buried lagoons that were operated by the Ciba~igy Corporation during the 1959's
(see figure 1). .
'nlree ~ tbMe lagoons have been excavated with contaminated soils being
, "removed off-eita. 'lbe lagoons are in close proximity to mmerous private.
~ater supply 811. and less than one mile frem French creek which is used for
public recreation and fishing. 'Ciba-Geigy sampled 67 r:esidential and camnercial
establishments in August 1, 1985 and found in same of these wells various
concentrations of trichloroethylene (TeE), 1,2-dichloroethylene (OCE) and
~
-------
I
~2 -
'inyl chloride (VC) 'oIi1ich are all considered hazardous Substances according to
the Canprehensive Envirormental' Response, Canpensation and r.i.abili ty Act (CEOCI:A).
Ciba Geigy and f't:)nsey signed a Consent order and Agreement wi th PADER to provide
certain residential and caDDercial locations with an alternative source of drinkin~
and contact water in DecEmber 1986. Ciba Geigy and f't:)nsey in addition continue
to !1I:)ni tor these and other designated locations periodically according to a pre-
scribed sampling and analytical procedures outlined under the ,ter:ms of this Consent
Order.
'n'lis 5i te ~s evaluated through the - Hazard Ranking' Systau (HRS) and sub-
sequently placed 'on the National Priori ties List (NPL) a list of hazardous waste nn-
si tes targeted for action under the Superfund program, in 1982.
o
o
c::; ~!;1
JI
o / i
o I
I
o
0
~ 0
00 Q
a
Q ~ 00 .~
o:a
0°
Oq
t..
o
<:>
<:)
.
SIT! MEA
.,to-)
,..aoV
LAGOON AREAS - ~
FIGURE 1:
KIMBERTON STUDY AREA
I
I ,
-------
- 3 -
COl'KJNITY ROLE IN THE SEUX:TION PROCESS
This proposed plan is being distributed to solicit public comment regarding
the proposed remedial alternatives to clean up 'the contamination at this site.
Detailed infOCDation on all of the material discussed here may be found in the
the docuoents contained in the Administrative Record (AR) for the site. Copies
of these doommts _are available for review at the following information repository
location: ' - , . ,
The East Pikeland To~hip Municipal Building
Rapps Dam ,Road
KUnberton, PA 19442
The public cannent period will run from August 25, 1988 to Septe:nber 23,
1988. Wri'tten comnents, questions and requests for information can be sent t::>:
Gene Pine, Project Officer
Bureau of Waste ManagE!T\ent
PA Cept. of Ei'lvirormental -
Resources
Fulton Building, 7th ~loor
3rd and UJcust Streets
Harrisburg, PA 1712"
. ,717-783-7816
EVALUATION CRITERIA
, .
I i
with PADER oversight, Ciba Geigy' and Monsey are currently condu::ting a
Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RIfFS) of the site which began in
1985 and is anticipated to be completed in late 1988. Several alternatives
addressing water supply have been evaluated against the following nine
evaluation criteria:
- Overall rotection of human ,health and the environment addressing whether
or not a r y provl e5 te protectlon scribes how risks posed
through each pathwy are eliminated, redu::ed or controlled through
treatment, engineering controls, or institutional controls.
- ~liance with ARARa addressing whether or not a remedy wi 11 meet all of
appl1c:able or relevant and appropriate requirements of other Federal
. and State envirOl1l&1tal statutes and/or provides grounds for invoking a .
wai VWJ: .
- Lo~ effectiveness and pemanence referring to the ability of a
r maintain reliable protectlon of h\.lDan health and the envirorment
over tia8 ax:e cleanup goals have been met.
-------
~ 4 -
- Reduction of toxici , mobil i . or volume is the anticipated perfonnance
o treatment technologl~s a remedy may employ.
- short-tezm effectiveness addresses the period of time needed to achieve
protection, and any adverse impacts on human health and the envirorment
that: may be" posed during the construction and implementation period until
cleanup goals are achieved. . '
- Implanentabili ty is the technical and administrative feasibility of a
remedy, lncl~ing the availability of materials and services needed to
implement a ?articular option.
- Cost includes estimated capital and operation and maintenance costs and
net present worth costs.
State Acceptance indicates Whethe~, based on its review of RIlE'S and
Proposed plan, the State concurs-on, opposes, or has no corcment on the
preferred alternative at the present time.
- Camroni ty Acceptance will be assessed in the Record of Decision following
a reY1ew of the public comments received on the Administrative Record and
PrOpose9 Plan.
S~Y OF ~IAL ALTERNATIVES
, .
I '
The Center fo~ Disease Control (CDC) has previously reviewed the initial.
sanpling data collected by Ciba-Geigy in August 1985 which incl\.~ed 67 residential
and Catrnercial esta~list'ments. ax: at that time certified l2wells as being
unfit for human consUDption and also supported alternative water supplies and
addi tional troni toring which had already been ini dated by PADER. '!be Ranedial In-
vestigation is continuing to fully identify the contaminant source (s) as W1Iell as
the full extent of ,groundwater contanination and will be addressed in a subsequent
,proposed Remedial Action Plan. '
Three alternatives were specifically developed to address the health risk to
those residents who may continue to utilize contaminated private W1Iells. 'l'hese
alternatives were identified and evaluated according to specific criteria required
by CEBCIA.
ALTERHMTIB 1: bI) FUR1'HER ACTION
, ,
Under this att8mative, residential and cacmercial establist1Dents having contamin-
ated wella..w5 continue to receive treatment on an'individual basis'by filtration
utilizing ~1~r activated carbon adsorption. A groundwater monitoring program
woold also continue which allows periodic reassessment of the extent of contanination
and the coD:enuations of hazardous substances contained in the grouxx:!water.
Bothtreat:ment and IOOni toriD; are being perfotmed by Ciba~igy and ~~ in
accordance with Consent order with PADER. Based upon a review of current ground-
. water data, this technology has served to reduce to non-detectable levels the
hazardous substances found in the groundwater obtained frail contaninated wells.
Estimated Construction costs: 9
Estimated Annual ~H costs: $259,009 - 399, "99
Estimated Implementation timeframe: 2-39 years
-------
- 5 -
A hunan .health evaluation was perfocned and it 'NaS detetmined in several
instances, trichloroethylene, dichloroethylene and lJinyl chloride exceed acceptable
concentration levels. Hunan exposure to these contaminants in groundwater may
lead to adverse health effects. .Therefore, this alternative is appropriate because
it would be protective of human health and the envirorment. This is an interim
remedy and will be reevallJ:ated once the full extent of the groundwater contamination
has been defined and the source 'ranediation alternatives have been evaluated.
.-'.
ALTERNATIVE 2:
TEMPORARY DRINKING WATER
The use of a temporary drinking water source for potable water (i .e. bottled
water) is a potential alternative to be linplemented until such time that a per-
~anent alternatilJe water supply can be ?rolJided for the residents and commercial
establislTnents or the contaminant plume has been remediated. A range of t'Ne to
t...'1irty years has been estimated as the length of time that residents and corrmercial .
establishments ~ill need to use a temporary drinking water sources.
80ttleq water can be supplied through delilJery to each of the 23 affected
locations. The alJeragedaily demand' for each residence was established for
drinking and cooking purposes only. Temporary ~upply to meet all domestic 'Nater
needs is linpractical since a majority of bottled~water lJendors supply five or six
gallon storage containers .oounted on a free-standing dispenser (i.e., bulk
storage and dispensing facilities for purchased 'water would be required for each
residence). Therefore, under AlternatilJe 2, all other domestic water Deeds (i.e.,
sani tary, bathing I washing, etc.) 'IoOuld continue' to be met through the existing
contaminated well supplies.
The provision of a temporary water supply to meet drinking and cooking needs,
woold reduce health risks resulting fran the ingestion of contauinated well
water. tk)wever I risks associated with airborne and de1:mal exposw:e would
continue. The magnitude of the health risk fran inhalation and dennal absorption
is expected to be comparatilJely small for a two-year implementation period and
would increase proportionately with increased time of exposure. '
Estimated Construction Cost:
Estimated Annual ~M
Estimated Timeframe:
- 3 -
$133,009
2-39 years
ALTERNATIVE 3: WATER aJo!PANY SERVICE CONNB:'1'IONS AND WATER-MAIN EXTENSION
(PUBLIC WATER SUPPLyt
Both t:b8 IboeDixv1l1. SystaD and Citizens Utility currently supply water
to a portiCII of the residences in the Kiaeerton area.
'l1'1e bot!t ~ny' s existing water distribution systems do not currently
extend to the area in which the contaminated wells are located. ~essing the
problem of the contauinated residential wells by replacanent with a FAJblic ;..ater
supply would require the extension of the water supply service system(s) .
The facilities to extend the water system(s) include approximately 8,~gg
feet of water main and 23 service connections. 'the location of water mains and
appurt~s for the water service would be finalized during the design phase.
-------
- 6 -
The Unplementation of this alternative would necessitate abandonment and
sealing of the individual residential wells in accordance wi th the PADER Staooard
Specifications for Seal~ng of Abandoned Wells. .
Extension of the existing system is a technically feasible 'and Lmplementable,
however, same member~ of the community prefer to continue using their own private
wells containinq th~carbon filter systams~ The capital cost for expaooing the
water canpany systan{s) is estimated at $1,399, "9". 'the physical expansion of
these faci li ties could be implemented in six to nine months including design,
a9Proval, and construction of the systan. Six additional months are necessary
for adminis~rative purposes, such as securing contracts.
Implementation of this alternative would completely eliminate risk due,to
exposure to contaminated ground water of residents using the contaminat~ ground-
water for drinking and contact water, It is a viable alternative and represents a
pecnanent solution for providing a drinking water source that meets all cri teria .
fo~ the protection of human health.
Esti~ted Construction Cost:
Estimated Annual C&M:
Estimated Timeframe:
$1,300,009
- 3 - '
1-2 years
PRELIMINARY DE'I'ERMINATION OF PREFERRED Rn1EDIAL ALTEBNATlVE
I,
The preferred alternative is alternative number~. 'this alternative selects
continued use of individual well treatment by granular activated carbon
adsorption as per"1?ADER's Consent order. Based on new information or public
cannents, EPA, in consultation with PACER, may tOOdify the preferred alternative
or select another response action presented in this Plan. " The public, therefore,
is encouraged to review and conment on all of the alternatives identified in this
Proposed Plan. The Administrative Record should be consulted for more information
on these alternatives.
This alternative provides complete protection, in the short-ter.m, to the
groundwater users by'treatment of the water at the individual wells. UJt1g-
ter.m effectiveness will be obtained by Unplementing additional alternatives
identified in the next operable unit ...aich will be available for public c::mnent '
once developed.
EPA, in OOD8Ultatioa with PACER, has made a preliminary determination that
the prefe:a8d: altamative provides the best balance of trade-off with re;;pect to
the nine cr1t8ia. If selected, the preferred alternative is anticipated to meet
the followiD) statutory requirements to:
- Protect h\mm health and the envirorment
- Attain ARARs
- Be cost-effective ,
- utilize pe~nt solutions and alternative treatment
(or resource recovery) technologies to the maximuu
extent practicable
-------
- 7 -
SUM9JUZI~ THE STA'lUrORY FINDINGS
In summary, at this time the preferred alternative is believed to provide
t.,e best balanc:e.of-trade-offs aoongalt!!!rnatives with respect to the criteria
~sed to evaluate-remedies. Based on the information available at this time,
therefore, EPA and PADER believe the preferred alternative would be protective,
would attain ~, would be cost-effective, and would ~tilize oermanent
50l~tions and alternative treatment teChnologies or resource r~very
technologies to the maxirnun extent practicable. 0
NEXT STEPS
Following the concl~sion of t.,e 3G-day ~lic comment ?eriod on this
proposed renedy, a Responsiveness Surrrnary ioIi11 be prepared. The Res?On-
siveness S~ry summarizes citizen's comments on the proposed remedy ana PADER 0
and EPA' s responses to these coetments. 'Ibereafter, PADER and EPA wi 11 prepare a
formal decision document that sunmarizes the decision process and the selected
remedy. This docunent will inclooe the RespOnsiveness Sumnary. Copies will be
made available, for public review, in the infocnation repository ~isted
previously.
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
Administrative Record CAR) - A legal document that contains information on a
Superfund site. '!be AR serves as the basis for the selection of a Superfund
response action, and this record is available to the public.
o ARARs - Applicable or relevant and appropriate Federal, State or
other pranulgated public health and envirormental requirement.
CERCLA - Canprehensive Envirormental Response, Canpensation, and Liability
Act established a Trust Fund for the purposes of cleanup at hazardous waste
sites identified on the National Priority List.
Feasibility St~ - 'n1e purpose of this study is to identify and screen
cleanup alternatives or riiDedial action, and to analyze in detail the technology
and costs involved with the various alternatives.
Natioaal Cco~inqency Plan (OCP) - Contains the regulations that govern 0 the
SUperfUlXi pcogma. '
o Natioaal Priorities List (NPL) - EPA's li~t of the nation's top priority
hazardous waste SlteS that are eligible to receive federal money for response
under superfund.
Remedial Desi~ - An engineering phaSe that follows the RecOrd of Decision
when technical draWlngs and specifications are developed for the subsequent
remedial action at a site on the National Priorities List (NPL).
.>
-------
- 8 -
Remedial Investigation (RI) - '!be purpose of this study is to gather the
data necessary to detetIDlne the type and extent of contamination at a Superfund
'site.
Superfund - 'lb! catIDOn name used for the Canprehensive Enviromental
Response, C~tion, and Liability Act, also referred as the Trust fund. The
Superfund proqrjD was establ ished to help pay for cleanup of hazardous waste
sites and to take' legal action to force those responsible for the sites to clean
t.'a'II up. .
, .
I !
. .
-------
APPENDIX C
-------
KIMBERI'ON SITE
AaotINISTRATIVE RECORD * **
INDEX OF IXCUMENI'S
. S ITE IDENI'IFICATICN
Pre1Uninary Assessment and Site Inspection Reports
1)
2)
Site Inspection Report, 6/23/82.
P. 1-10.
Report: Hazard Rankirq System ~el of Kllrberton, TOO No. F3-8206-10,
EPA No. PA-423, prepared by Mr. David A. Nickerson, Ecology and Environment, Inc.;
7/23/82. P. 11-40.
3)
,
,
,I
Report: A Site Inspection of Kiroerton, ToP No. F3-8203-22, EPA No. PA-423,
prepared by Mr. GrE!Qq Crystall, Ecolooy and',',Envircrurent, Inc., and Mr. Joseph G.
McGovern, Ecology and Environment, Inc., 7/23/8~. P. 41-167. '
. :i
Report: A Toxico1cqical Impact Assessmen.t dE Kllrbertoo TeE Lagoons,
TOO Ner. F3-8203-22A, EPA No. PA-423, prepared by Mr. Gregg Crystall, Ecclcgy
and Environment, Inc., Mr. Kenneth G. Syrrmsi) Ecolcgy and Envircrunent, Inc.,
and Mr. Josep~ G. McGovern, Ecology and Env~fcrunenr' Inc., 8/31/82. P. 168-288.
'I r
"/ I
I ,
4)
..1
*
.Administrative Record available 8/15/88.
**
Supporti~ SatlpliI'VJ Data is stored at the Regioo III Central Regiooal
I.aboratory.
.1
';..
"
-------
REMEDIAL ENFORCEMENr PtANNING
Signed Order 0 "0
1)
Letter to Mr. Bradford F. Whitman, Dechert, Price and Rhoads, fran Ms.
Melinda J. Holland, Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resoorces,
re: transmittal of signed Ccnsent Orders, 12/19/86. P. 1-53. The
Consent Orders are attached.
2)
Letter to Mr. Bradford F. Whitman, Dechert, Price and Rhoads, fran Mr.
Douqlas F. Brennan, Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources,
re: transmittal of final Consent Order and h;}reerrent, 7/9/87. P. 54-83.
The Second Consent Order and ~reement is attached.
3) . Letter to Mr. . Bradford F. Whitman, Dechert, Price and Rhoads, and Mr.
Be'njamin G. Stonelake, Blank, Rane~1 Canisky and McCauley, re: negotiatirq
the prcposed Consent ~reement and I:~sent Order, 9/30/87. P. 84-85.
. .
2
..,~
. o.
-------
- - - . 2)
REMEDIAL RESPONSE PIANNI~
Remedial InvestiQation Reports
1)
Report: Hyrlrcgeolcgical Assessment on Ground'Eter Conditions in Kbrberton,
~sylvania, prepared by Mr. Paul M. Yaniga, GrC\Jl"ld'Eter Technolcgy, Inc.,
and Mr. William Smith, Gr()..lnd~ter Technoloqy, Inc., 1/31/83. P. 1-107.
RepOrt: Remedial Action Plan, Excavation of ~oons 5,7, and 9 at Monsey
Products Ccmpany, Kbrberton, Pennsylvania, prepared by Groundwater Technolcgy,
Inc., 9/14/84. P. 108-125.
3)
Report: Revised Ground'Eter r-tnitoring Prcqram, KirrtJerton, Pennsylvania,
(Previous Submission 17 Mav 1983), prepared by Mr. Frank Aceto, Groundwater
- TechnolCQY, Inc., and Mr. Ra'fl"Ol1d CXlchaine, Enviroomental Resources Man~ement, Ir
2/26/85. P. 126-153.
4)
Report: Revised Ground\oolater r-tnitoring Prcqram, KirrtJerton, Pennsylvania,
(Previous Submission 17 May 1983), prepared by Mr. Frank Aceto, GrC\Jl"ldwater
Techno1cgy, Inc., and Mr. Raym::x'\d CXlchaine, Enviroorrental Resalrces Man~errent,
Inc., 2128/85. P. 154-168. . -
5)
Report: Mdendun to Remedial Action Prcqram of 4 February 1985, Excavation
ot !.a:Joons 6,7, and 9 at Mcnsey Products CattPanv, Kllrberton, Pennsylvania,
prepared by Gralnd'Eter Technolcgy, Inc., 4/3/85. P. 169-457.
6)
Reoort: Interim Status Report, Ground\oolater ~itorirQ Pra]rCl'l\, KiIrbertcn,
Penrisylvania,. prepared by Mr. Frank Aceto, Gralnd'Eter Technolcgy, Inc.,
and Mr. Mark J. Wrigley, GrC\Jl"ld'Eter Techno1cgy, Inc., 12/23/85. P. 458-694.
7)
Report: Report of FindirQs, Ground'Eter M:nitoring Prcgrams, Kbrt>ertcn,
Pennsylvania, prepared by Mr. Frank Aceto, GrC\Jl"ldwater Techno1cgy, Inc.,
and Mr. Mark J. Wrigley, Gralnd\oolater Technolcgy, Inc., 10/16/86. P. 695-1034.
Reoort: Work Plan For Canp1etien of The Remedial Investigation and
Feasibility Study, KiIrCerton, Pennsylvania, prepared by Envirorunental-
Resources Managerent, Inc., and GrC\Jl"ldwater Technolcgy, Inc., 7/87. P. 1035-1385.
CorrespOOElence and Supportirq Locunentatien
8)
1)
Letter to Mr. Eugene W. .Pine, Pennsylvania Departmerit of Environmental
Resa.1rces, fran Mr. J. Stewart Johnsen, CIBA-GEIGY, re: transmittal of the
Data Review Pac~es, 6/22/87. P. 1-9. The Data Review Packages are attached.
Letter to Mr. ~ene W. Pine, Pennsylvania Department of Envirolluental
Resources. fran Mr. J. SteWirt Jchnsa1, ClBA-GEIGY, re: transmittal of the
canputer sunnary whid1 includes the results of GN:. system s~ling, 7/20/87.
P. 10-11. The carpJter sumnary is attached.
2)
3)
Letter to Mr. E~ene W. Pine, Pennsylvania Department of Envirolluental
Resoorces, frem Mr. J. SteWirt Jdmson, ClBA-GEIGY, re: transmittal of the
carouter sumnary of the analytical results fran the GAt: system s~ling,
8/17/87. P. 12-13. The c~ter sumnary is attad1ed. .
3
.~
-------
4)
Letter to Mr. Eu;;ene W. I:>ine, Pennsylvania r.'epartment of Environmental
Resoorces, fran Mr. J. Ste\l6rt Johnson, ClBA-GEIGY, re: transmittal of the
: canputer sumnary of the analytical results ootained fran the quarterly
sarrpling,8/17/87. P.14-39. The canputer sumnary is attached.
5)
Letter to Mr. Eu;;ene W. Pine, J?ennsylvania r.'epartment of Environrrental
Resairces,. fran Mr. J. Ste\l6rt Johnson, ClBA-GEIGY, re: transmittal of the
ranaininq analytical sllIT1T1aries and Woe pack~es for the quarterly samplir1g,
9/11/87. P. 40-63. The analytical sumnaries and ONOC packages are attached.
6)
Letter to Mr. Etqene W. Pine, Pennsylvania r.'epartInent of Envirornnental
Resoorces, fran Mr. J. Ste\l6rt Jdmson, CI8A-GEIGY, re: transmittal of the'
canputer surrmary which includes the latest results fran the GAC system
sampling, 9/21/87. P. 64-65. The cartpUter surrmary is attached.
7)
Letter to Mr. Eu;;ene W. Pine, Pennsylvania r.'epartment of Environrrental
Resoorces, fran Mr. J. Ste\l6rt Johnson, ClBA-GEIGY, re: transmittal of
the cc::rnpu ter surrmary of the ana 1 yt ica t resu 1 ts oota ined f ran the J. Mocney
residence and ERM's Data Packaqe Review, 9/21/87. P. 66-69. The cat'lp.Jter
summa~ and the Data Package Review are attached. .
8)
Letter to Mr. Eugene W. Pine, Pennsylvania Department of Envircrnrental
ResaJrces, fran Mr. J. Sterwart Johnsen, ClBA-GEIGY, re: transmittal of the
cC1'f1)Uter summary of the analytical results ootained fran the Octc::ber
1987 quarterly samplirvJ of the GAC systE!!!S, 11/20/87. P. 70-96. The cat'pUter
summary is attached.
Letter to Mr. Eugene W~ Pine, Pennsylvania Department of Environmental
ResaJrces, fran Mr. J. Ste\l6rt Johnsen, ClBA-GEIGY, re: transmittal of the
canpute'r sumnary of the analytical results ootained fran the January 1988
quarterly sampling of the GAC systemS, 2/29/88. P. 97-132. The ccrrpJter
summary is attached.
9)
10) Letter to Mr. ElQene W. Pine, Pennsylvania Department of Enviroranental
ResaJrces, fran Mr. J. Ste\l6rt Johnson, ClBA-GEIGY, re: transmittal of the
January 1988 quarterly sarpling WOC Data Review Package and the January-
February 1988 Rebeddirq Data Package, 3/21/88. P. 133-142. The QA/OC
, . Review Package and the RebeddirvJ Data Pack~e are attached.
11) Letter to Mr. Elgene W. Pine, Pennsylvania Department of Envircnmental
ResaJrces, fran Mr. J. Stewart Johnsat, ClBA-GEIGY, r'e: transmittal of the
c~ter surmary ~ich includes the results ,of the GAt: system sarl1;)ling,
5/19/88. P. 143-145. The caTQUter sumnary is attach~. .
12) Letter to Mr. Elgene W. Pine, Pennsylvania Deoartment of Envircnmental
ResaJrces, ~ran Mr. J. Stewart Johnsat, CIBA-GEIGY, re: transmittal of the
c~uter sumnary of the analytical results ootained fran the April 1988
quarterly ~ling of ~e GAC systems, 5/19/88. P. 146-172. The CCJr'plter
Sumtlar{ is attached.
4
".:'"
'1>
-------
13) Let~er to Mr. Eugene W. Pine, Pennsylvania Department of Environmental
Resoorces, fran Mr. J. SteWlrt Johnson, CIBA~EIGY, re: transmittal of
the ~ter S\.lnl'l\ary ~ich includes the May 17 and 18 results of GAC .
system sarrplinq 6/13/88. P. 173-175. The caTPliter surrmary is attached
14) Letter to Mr. Eu::;ene W. Pine, -Pennsylvania Department of
Resources~ fran Mr. J. SteWlrt Johnson, CIBA~EIGY, re:
April 1 qA8 quarterly sarnplio;} OA/r::x:. Data Review Package,
The OA/OC Data Review Packaqe is attached.
Environmental
transmittal of the
6/20/88. P. 176-189.
. I
.,.
5
...~
-------
GENERAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENTS *
l)
2)
."Promulgatiotl of Situ ~rom Updates t-4," Federal Register, dated 6/t0/86.
"Proposal of Update 4," Federal Re~ister, dated 9/t8/85.
3)
Memorandum to U. S. EPA from Mr. Gene Lucero regarding community relations
at Superfund Enforcement sites, dated 8/28/85.
4 )
Groundwater Contamination and Protection, undated by Mr. Donald v.
Feliciano on 8/28/85.
5)
Memorandum to Toxic Waste Management Division Directors Regions I-X from
Mr. WilHam Hedeman and Mr. Gene Lucero re: Policy on Floodplains and
Wetlands Assessments for CERCLA Actions, 8/6/85.
6)
7)
Guidance on Remedial Investigations under CERCLA, dated 6/85.
Guidance on Feasibility Studies under CERCLA, dated 6/85.
8)
9)
"Proposal of Update 3," Federal Register, dated 4/l0/85.
Memorandu~ to Mr. Jack McGraw entitled "Community Relations Activites
at Superfund Sites - Interim Guidance," dated 3/22/85.
lO)
ll)
'.Proposal of Update 2," Federal Register, .dated tO/tS/84
EPA Groundwater Protection Strategy, dated 9/84.
l2)
Memorandum to U.S. EPA from Mr. William Heckman, Jr. entitled
'.Transmittal at Superfund Removal Procedures - Revision 2," dated 8/20/84.
13)
14 )
"Proposal of Update 1," Federal Register, dated 9/8183..
Community Relations in Superfund: A Handbook (interim version), dated
9/83.
15 )
'.Propo8al. of lint lIfatl'onal Priority Lht," Federal Register, dated
12/30/82.
16)
l7)
"Expanded Il!11b11!ty Li8t," Federal Re~ister, dated 7/23/82.
"Interim Priorities List," Federal Register, dated 10/23/81.
la}
Uncontrolled Hazardou8 Waste Site Ranking System: A User's Manual
(undated).
t9)
20)
Field Standard Operating Procedures - Air Surveillanc8 (undated).
Field Standard Operating Procedures - Site Safety Plan (undated).
. Located in EPA Region ~II office.
-,.
-------
'P~1;rra I -~-
, ,;11: ",' 4~
J 198& ',1)
.)i .
PEN N S Y L.. "'NIe~%er;,;.:1t Clvis/on
~.. ,.
"'/ ~~-
. "-'.;a"
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES
Post Office Box 2063 .
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120
September 29, 1988
(
Deputy Secretary for
Environmental Protection
Stephen R. Wassersug, Director.
Hazardous Waste Management Division
EPA Region III
841 Chestnu~ Building.
Philadelp~ia, PA 19107
.(717) 787-5028
Re: Letter of Concurrence
Kimberton Superfund Site, Record Of Decision (ROD)
Dear Mr. Wassersug:
The Record Of Decision for the first operable unit
at the Kimberton site has been reviewed by the Department. We
agree that the actions already being implemented by the
responsible party, pursuant to the existing consent. order with'
the Department, meets all necessary requirements for this'
operable unit. I hereby concur witp the EPA's proposed remedy,
with the. following conditions:
*
The Department will reserve our right and
responsibility to take independent. enforcement actions
pursuant to state law.
This concurrence with the selected remedial action is
not intended to provide any assurances pursuant to SARA
Section 104(c)(3).
*
Thank you for the opportunity to concur with this EPA
Record Of Decision. If you have any questions regarding this
matter please do not hesitate to contact me. .
si7;e~ .
~~CClell~
-I
'.;. .
. A '
------- |