UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
JAN 2 6 1996
OFPICB OF
SOLID VCVSTB AND SMKRGKHCY
RSSPONSB
SUBJECT:
FROM:
TO:
Puroose-
OSWER Directive No. 9835.15c
Revise z. Policy c.. Performance of Risk Assessments
During, Remedial /-investigation/Feasibility Studies
(RI/F|
-------
related deliverables that EPA was to provide PRPs to allow them
to complete the RI/FS; and No. 9835.15b issued on September 1,
1993, which gave EPA Regions the option of allowing PRPs to
perform the risk assessment under certain specified conditions.
Since issuing the 1993 Directive, PRPs have been allowed to
perform the risk assessment at most sites. The Agency's
experience with these risk assessments has shown that with
appropriate oversight, PRPs can perform acceptable risk
assessments. EPA has found that letting the PRPs perform the
baseline risk assessment can be the most effective and efficient
way to complete, the RI/FS.
New Policy
EPA has determined that it will generally be appropriate
for PRPs to conduct the risk assessment at most sites, subject co
adequate EPA oversight. EPA maintains its rights not to let PRPs
perform the risk assessrent in certain circumstance under section
104(a)(1) of CERCLA which states that "no remedial investigation
or feasibility study (RI/FS) shall be authorized except on a
determination by the President that the party is qualified to
conduct the RI/FS."
Although this new policy does not require a Headquarters
Consultation, the Regions should continue to consider the six
criteria presented in Directive No. 9835.15b, and listed below
(slightly modified), when deciding whether or not to allow the
PRPs to perform the risk assessment:
o EPA's prior experience with the requesting PRPs at this or
other sites and in particular whether excessive oversight
and revisions were necessary when that PRP previously
conducted a risk assessment;
o PRP or PRP contractor's experience in conducting acceptable
human health and ecological risk assessments at Superfund
. sites,- - s
o PRP or PRP contractor's willingness- to. follow current
Superfund risk assessment processes and guidances;
o PRP or PRP contractor's demonstrated ability to submit data
to EPA. in the proper format;
o Available EPA resources and schedule for RI/FS completion;
and
o Level of public concern at the site.
We anticipate that there may be some sites where EPA will
not allow the PRP. to perform the risk assessment based on an
evaluation of these six criteria. If any Region wishes to
-------
consult with HQ on making such a. determination using these
criteria, they may consult with David Bennett, OERR Senior
Process Manager for Risk at (703) 603-8800.
Regions may amend existing RI/FS Consent Orders to allow
PRPs to conduct the risk assessment as long as this will not
significantly delay completing the RI/FS.
This administrative reform complements other reforms that
are designed to make the Superfur^d program faster, fairer, and
more efficient. Under another reform, EPA is exploring ways to
reduce oversight of PRPs that have performed high quality work
and have cooperated with EPA throughout the cleanup process.
Further Information
If you have any questions about this policy, please contact
Stephen Ells at (703) 603-8822.
NOTICE: The policies set out in this memorandum, are intended
solely as guidance. They are not intended, nor can they be
relied upon, to create any rights enforceable by any party in
litigation with the United States. EPA officials may decide ta
follow the guidance provided in this memorandum, or to act at
variance with the guidance, based on analysis of specific site
circumstances. The Agency also reserves the right to change this
guidance at any time without public notice.
cc: Regional Superfund Branch Chiefs
Regional Superfund Toxics Integration Coordinators
Regional Biological Technical Assistance Group Coordinators
------- |