4>EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Radiation and Indoor Air Washington, DC 20460 EPA 402-R-02-003 June 2002 Long Term Hydrological Monitoring Program: Amchitka, Alaska 2001 ------- Long Term Hydrological Monitoring Program Amchitka, Alaska 2001 Max G. Davis and Terry L. Mouck P ""'1"1 ..,,'"",...- I !~,"" i,Ut t..~a i v' U.S. EPA Library L''''' \I""~..l~ t"j <:'~'111g (}...) 'w - -~ .), ,I L' - Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy under Interagency Agreement DE-AI08-96NVl1969 RADIATION AND INDOOR ENVIRONMENTS NATIONAL LABORATORY OFFICE OF RADIATION AND INDOOR AIR U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY P.O. BOX 98517 LAS VEGAS, NV 89193-8517 ------- NOTICE The information in this document has been funded wholly, or in part, by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EP A) through Interagency Agreement (IAG) DE-AI08-96NV 11969 from the United States Department of Energy (DOE). This document has been subjected to the Agency's peer and administrative review process, and it has been approved for publication as an EP A document. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. 11 ------- ABSTRACT Surface water samples were collected on the island of Amchitka, Alaska, from July 31 through August 4,2001, as part of the Environmental Protection Agency's Long Term Hydrological Monitoring Program. The samples were scanned for the presence of gamma-ray emitting radionuc1ides, and analyzed to determine tritium concentrations. Both conventional and enrichment tritium analytical methods were used. No man made gamma-ray emitters were detected, and results of the tritium analyses are consistent with historical values. Trends in decreasing concentration levels of tritium appear to be due to radioactive decay as well as dilution. 11l ------- This page left blank intentionally IV ------- CONTENTS Page Notice. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Abstract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111 Figures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VI Tables. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. ... . .... . . . .. . . .. . . . . . .. . . . ..o . VI Acronyms and Abbreviations . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . .... . .. .... .... . .. .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . V11 Acknowledgments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V111 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . .. . . . . . .. . .. .. .. .. . ... . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 History. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Sampling Sample Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 . . .. . . [[[ 6 Water Analysis Results [[[ 6 Conclusions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . " . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 References . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Glossary of Terms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . .. . .. .. . . .. . . ... . .. .. .. . .. . . . .. . . . . . . .12 Appendix A (Standard Operating Procedures) Appendix B (Summary of Analytical Procedures) ------- FIGURES Page 1. Location of Amchitka Island, Alaska. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2. Amchitka Island and Camp Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3. LongshotJMilrow Surface Ground Zero Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 4. Cannikin Surface Ground Zero Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 TABLES Page 1. Sampling Locations Established at the Longshot Site. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 2. Sampling Locations Established at the Milrow Site. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 3. Sampling Locations Established at the Cannikin Site. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 4. Sampling Locations Established to Provide Background Data. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 VI ------- DCG DOE EPA g 3H 3H+ HpGe lAG keV kg kt L LTHMP m MDC MeV mm mL MT aRIA pCi/L PHS R&IE SGZ SOP USGS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS Derived Concentration Guide U.S. Department of Energy U.S. Environmental Protection Agency gram tri ti urn enriched tritium high purity germanium gamma detector Interagency Agreement kilo electron volts = thousand electron volts kilogram, 1000 grams kiloton (TNT equivalent) liter Long-Term Hydrological Monitoring Program meter minimum detectable concentration million electron volts minute milliliter = one thousandth of a liter Megaton = 1,000,000 tons equivalent TNT Office of Radiation and Indoor Air picocuries per liter = 10-12 curies per liter = 1/1,000,000,000,000 curies per liter U.S. Public Health Service Radiation and Indoor Environments National Laboratory surface ground zero standard operating procedure U.S. Geological Survey vii ------- ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors would like to acknowledge Dennis Farmer, Richard Flotard, Pat Honsa, Rose Houston, and the staff of the hydrological monitoring program, EP A, for their dedication to quality and their tireless work in the execution of the sampling project. In addition, we would like to give a special thank you to Dr. Vernon Hodges, PhD, Chemistry, University Nevada, Las Vegas (UNL V) for his extramural review of this report. Vlll ------- INTRODUCTION Under an Interagency Agreement (lAG) with the DOE, the EPA's Radiation and Indoor Environments National Laboratory (R&IE) located in Las Vegas, NV. conducts a Long Term Hydrological Monitoring Program (LTHMP) to measure radioactivity concentrations in water sources near the sites of underground nuclear explosions. The results of the LTHMP provide assurance that radioactive materials from the tests have not migrated into drinking water supplies. This report presents the results for the samples collected from July 31 through August 4,2001, on Amchitka Island, Alaska. History Three nuclear detonations were conducted on Amchitka Island in the Aleutian Island chain of Alaska. See Figure 1 for location of Amchitka Island, Alaska. Project Longshot, conducted on October 29, 1965, was an 85-kt yield test emplaced at 2359 ft depth. It was a Vela Uniform Program, designed to investigate seismic phenomena. Project Longshot resulted in some surface contamination, even though the chimney did not extend to the surface. Project Milrow, conducted on October 2, 1969, was an approximately 1-MT "calibration test" of the seismic and environmental responses to the detonation of large-yield nuclear explosives. The emplacement depth of Project Milrow was 3990 ft. Project Cannikin, conducted on November 6, 1971, was a proof test of the Spartan antibalistic missile warhead with less than a 5-MT yield emplaced at 5875 ft depth. See Figures 2, 3, & 4 for sampling locations. Amchitka Island is composed of several hundred feet of permeable tundra overlaying tertiary volcanics. The ground water system consists of a freshwater lens floating on seawater; estimates of the depth to the saline freshwater-interface range from 3900 to 5250 ft (Chapman and Hokett, 1991). It is likely that any migration from the test cavities would discharge to the nearest salt water body, Project Milrow to the Pacific Ocean, and Projects Longshot and Cannikin to the Bering Sea (Chapman and Hokett, 1991). The sampling locations on Amchitka Island are shallow wells and surface sampling sites. Therefore, the monitoring network for Amchitka Island is restricted to monitoring of surface contamination and drinking water supplies. Sampling Sample collection on Amchitka was conducted between July 31 and August 4,2001. Field collection procedures and sampling locations are described in standard operating procedure (SOP) CER-203, and the Amchitka, Alaska Long Term Hydrologic Monitoring Plan. All samples were collected with the exception of several wells that were plugged or mud pits that were filled. However, samples were taken at or near the original sample location. The samples will provide background information for future sampling efforts. . 1 ------- ~ ~ ... ~ ~~Cl£' ! ~- -- . -- -- S/£3tR/4 o o l BEAUFORT SEA I), I ~ I . CANADA I I D .--..-.. NORTH PACIFIC OCEAN I I I I UNITED ~ STATES SAN FRANCISCO I ~ ro ~ en ro ~ "'=' I:: ro - en - ro ~ .- ...c: u S -< ...... o I:: .s:2 ...... ro u o ~ N ~ QJ ... ~ ~ ------- ";' e Surface Ground Zero (B] Water Sampling Locations Map is not to scale . ~ : ::~J;h~j~~~:~i ;a!:,'\,:(: .. : ,. ~..~, .)': ::;,.",',,'.,< ~ . ",' :,~JiJimlliiiimiiliiilj. .= Enginee~s p~ I Engineer Rd. (B] Water Sampling Locations Map is not to scale 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 Figure 2. Amchitka Island and Camp Area 3 ------- ~ N e Surface Ground Zero IjJ Water Sampling Locations . . . . ream ... 11113 . LINEAR / FRACTURE / Cleve. nger \4 Creek ~ III ~ .... ~ Map is not to scale Map is not to scale MILROW LONG SHOT I o Surface Ground Zero ~ Long Shot Pond 3 EI Water Sampling Locations - Streams \ Figure 3. LongshotlMilrow Surface Ground Zero Area 4 ------- , l- S Lf + N 8 Surface Ground Zero o Water Sampling Locations Map is not to scale Figure 4. Cannikin Surface Ground Zero Area 5 ------- Sample Analysis Radiochemical laboratory procedures used to analyze the samples collected for this report are summarized in R&IE's SOPs listed in Appendix A, and for procedures summary see Appendix B. These include standard methods to identify natural and man-made gamma-emitting radionuclides, tritium, plutonium, strontium, and uranium in water samples. Two types of tritium analyses were performed: conventional and electrolytic enrichment. The enrichment method lowers the minimum detectable concentration (MDC) from approximately 300 pCiIL to about 5 pCiIL. An upper limit of activity of 700 - 800 pCiIL has been established for the tritium enrichment method because sample cross-contamination becomes a problem at higher levels. In late 1995, it was decided that a maximum of 25 percent of all samples collected would be analyzed by the low-level enrichment method. This decision was based on the time required for analysis, budgetary constraints, and an assessment of past results. Under the cUlTent sampling and analysis protocol for the site, all samples are initially screened for tritium activity by the conventional method, and selected samples are enriched. At this time, only sampling locations that are in position to show migration are selected for enrichment. Sufficient sample is collected from new sampling locations to perform all routine analyses, and a full suite of other radiochemical determinations including assays for strontium-90, plutonium, and uranium. Water Analysis Results The gamma-ray spectrometric analysis results indicate that no man-made gamma-ray emitting radionuclides were detected in any samples collected from the three sites: Cannikin, Longshot, and Milrow. Tritium concentrations above normal background at Longshot ranged from 542:t 10 pCiIL at GZ #2 to 16 :t 4 pCiIL at Pond #3. The level at GZ #2 is well below the 20,000 pCiIL level defined in the U.S. EPA Drinking Water Regulation (40 CPR 141). Long term trends in tritium concentrations on Amchitka Island, Alaska, follow a decreasing trend established from prior LTHMP sampling. Tritium values for the samples are given in Tables 1,2,3, and 4. Conclusions Tritium concentrations on Amchitka Island, Alaska, follow a decreasing trend established from prior LTHMP sampling. At locations around the Longshot SGZ where contamination is known to exist, concentrations continue to decrease faster than would be expected from tritium decay alone, indicating that dilution is also an important factor. 6 ------- Table 1. Sampling Locations Established at the Longshot Site (Figure 3). Sample Collection Emiched Tritium Tritium (0) Gamma Spectrometry (b) Location Date pCilL :t 2 SD (MDC) pCilL + 2 SD (MDC) pCilL (MDC) WL-l 7/31/01 18:t 135 (222) ND (1.6) WL-2 7/31/01 69 :t 136 (222) ND (1.8) GZ-l 8/03/01 Gamma only ND (1.6) GZ-2 8/03/01 542 :t 10 (7.0) ND (1.9) EP A-I 7/31/01 32 :t 136 (222) ND (1.9) Surface Locations Reed Pond 8/03/01 Gamma only ND (1.6) Mud Pit No.1 8/03/01 96 :t 137 (222) ND (1.9) Stream(c) Mud Pit No.2 8/03/01 Gamma only ND (1.5) Spring(C) Mud Pit No.3 8/03/01 14:t 4.1 (6.3) ND (1.6) Spring(C) Stream East of Longshot 8/03/01 110:t 136 (221) ND (1.9) Stream West ofGZ 8/03/01 11.5 :t 4.0 (6.0) ND ( 1.5) LS Pond No.1 8/03/01 36 :t 135 (221) ND (1.8) LS Pond No.2 8/03/01 110:t 136 (221) ND (1.9) LS Pond No.3 8/03/01 16 :t 4.0 (6.0) ND (1.7) LS Pond No.4 8/03/01 123 :t 142 (230) ND (1.6) Vegetation 8/01/01 118:t 142 (230) (a) Indicates results are less than MDC. (b) No gamma radionuc1ides detected above MDC. (c) (Seep or spring, grab sample at or near original sampling location. Sampling locations have been removed or plugged. (ND) Non-detected MDC for gamma represents J37Cs. 7 ------- Table 2. Sampling Locations Established at the Milrow Site (Figure 3). Sample Collection Enriched Tritium Tritium (a) Gamma Spectrometry(b) Location Date pCiIL :t 2 SD (MDC) pCiIL :t 2 SD (MDC) pCi/L (MDC) W-l 8/02/01 Sample from stream (well plugged) Gamma only ND (1.6) W-2 Stream(c) 8/02/01 -14:t 135 (222) ND (1.8) W-3 Pond(C) 8/02/01 18:t 135 (222) ND (1.6) W-4 Well Removed (No Sample) W-5 Well Removed (No Sample) W -6 Pond(c) 8/02/01 50 :t 136 (222) ND (1.5) W-7 Well Removed (No Sample) W -8 Stream(C) 8/02/01 9 :t 135 (222) ND (1.7) W -9 Stream(c) 8/02/01 73 :t 136 (222) ND (1.8) W-IO Well Removed (No Sample) W -11 Pond(c) 8/02/01 Well Plugged 69 :t 136 (222) ND (1.6) W-12 8/02/01 9.0:t 135 (222) ND (1.6) W-13 Stream(C) 8/02/01 4.6 :t 134 (221) ND (1.6) W-14 Well Removed (No Sample) W-15 Well Removed (No Sample) W-16 Pond(C) 8/02/01 14:t 134 (221) ND (1.5) W-17 Well Removed (No Sample) W-18 8/02/01 -23 :t 133 (221) ND (1.6) W-19 Well Removed (No Sample) Surface Locations Heart Lake(c) 8/02/01 Well Plugged (Gamma only) ND (1.8) Duck Cove Creek 8/01/01 -18:t 134 (222) ND (1.6) Clevenger Creek 8/01/01 41 + 136 (222) ND (1.5) (a) (b) (c) Indicates results are less than MDC. No gamma radionuclides detected above MDC. Seep or spring, grab sample at or near original sampling location. Sampling locations have been removed or plugged. (ND) Non-detected MDC for gamma represents J37Cs. 8 ------- Table 3. Sampling Locations Established at the Cannikin Site (Figure 4). Sample Collection Enriched Tritium Tritium(a) Gamma Spectrometry(b) Location Date pCifL :t 2 SD pCifL :t 2 SD (MDC) pCifL (MDC) (MDC) HTH-3 7/31/01 13.6 :t 4.0 (6.3) ND (1.8) Surface Locations Cannikin Lake, north 7/31/01 15 :t 4.2 (6.5) ND ( 1.5) Cannikin Lake, south 7/31/01 13.5 :t 4.6 (7.0) ND (1.9) Ice Box Lake 8/01/01 15 :t 4.2 (6.5) ND (1.9) Stream SW Cannikin GZ(c) 8/01/01 59 :t 136 (222) ND (1.6) DK-45 Lake 8/01/01 -59 :t 133 (221) ND (1.5) DK-45 Veg 8/01/01 208:t 144 (230) Decon Pump Well Removed (No Sample) Decon Sump Well Removed (No Sample) Constantine Spr Removed (No Sample) Pumphouse RX-Site Spr(C) 8/04/01 Removed (No Sample) ND (1.5) TX-Site Spr 8/04/01 9.0:t 136 (221) ND (1.8) TX-Site Water Well Removed (No Sample) Tank House White Alice Creek 8/01/01 13 + 4.2 (6.5) ND (1.5) (a) Indicates results are less than MDC. (b) No gamma radionuclides detected above ~C. . . . . (c) Seep or spring, grab sample at or near ongtnal samphng location. Samplmg locatiOns have been removed or plugged. & D7C (ND) Non-detected MDC lor garnrna represents s. 9 ------- Table 4. Sampling Locations Established to Provide Background Data. Sample Collection Enriched Tritium Tritium(a) Gamma Spectrometry(b) Location Date pCi/L :t 2 SD (MDC) pCi/L :t 2 SD (MDC) pCiIL (MDC) Army Well No. I 8/04/01 41 :t 135 (221) ND (1.9) Army Well No.2 8/02/01 41 :t 135 (221) ND (1.6) Army Well No.3 Well Removed (No Sample) Army Well No.4 8/01/01 82 :t 136 (221) ND (1.7) Site E Hydro Well Removed (No Sample) Site D Hydro Well Removed (No Sample) Surface Locations Jones Lake 8/04/01 87 :t 137 (222) ND (1.6) Constantine Spr 8/04/01 17 :t 4.2 (6.4) ND (1.9) Clevenger Lake 8/02/01 64 :t 135 (221) ND (1.6) Rain Sample 8/03/01 41 :t 135 (221) Rain Sample 8/04/01 133 :t 137 (221) (a) Indicates results are less than MDC. (b) No gamma radionuclides detected above MDC. (ND) Non-detected MDC for gamma represents I37Cs. 10 ------- REFERENCES Chapman, J.B. and S.L. Hokett, 1991, Evaluation of Groundwater Monitoring at Offsite Nuclear Test Areas, DOE Nevada Field Office Report DOE/NV/l0845-07, Las Vegas, NV. CHA1991 Code of Federal Regulations, 1988, Drinking Water Regulations, Title 40, part 141, Washington D.C. CFR88 Corley, J.P., D.H. Denham, R.E. Jaquish, D.E. Michels, A.R. Olsen, D.A. Waite, 1981. A Guide for Environmental Radiological Surveillance at U.S. Dept. of Energy Installations, DOE/EP- 0023. Office of Operational Safety Report, US. Department of energy, Washington, D.C. DOE81 U.S. Atomic Energy Commission. Project (Cannikin. May, 1971 (internal document). U.S. Department of Energy, Nevada Operations Office, Health Physics Division, Environmental Branch. Long-Term Hydrologic Monitoring Program Amchitka Island, Alaska. Las Vegas, NY: US. Department of Energy, Nevada Operations Office; NYO-242; 1982. US. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Radiation and Indoor Air. Amchitka, Alaska Long Term Hydrologic Monitoring Plan. Las Vegas, NV: US. Environmental Protection Agency, Radiation and Indoor Environments National Laboratory. Submitted to US. Department of Energy April, 1997. 11 ------- GLOSSARY OF TERMS Background Radiation The radiation in man's environment, including cosmic rays and radiation from naturally- occurring and man-made radioactive elements, both outside and inside the bodies of humans and animals. The usually quoted average individual exposure from background radiation is 125 millirem per year in mid-latitudes at sea level. Curie (Ci) The basic unit used to describe the rate of radioactive disintegration. The curie is equal to 37 billion disintegrations per second, which is the equivalent of 1 gram of radium. Named for Marie and Pierre Curie who discovered radium in 1898. One microcurie (Ilei) is 0.000001 Ci. Isotope Atoms of the same element with different numbers of neutrons in the nuclei. Thus 12C, BC, and 14e are isotopes of the element carbon, the numbers denoting the approximate atomic weights. Isotopes have very nearly the same chemical properties, but have different physical properties (for example 12C and Be are stable, 14e is radioactive). Enrichment Method A method of electrolytic concentration that increases the sensitivity of the analysis of tritium in water. This method can be used for samples containing less than 800 pCiIL of tritium.. Minimum Detectable Concentration (MDC) The smallest amount of radioactivity that can be reliably detected with a probability of Type I and Type IT errors at 5 percent each (DOE 1981). Tritium A radioactive isotope of hydrogen that decays by beta emission. Its half-life is about 12.5 years. Type I Error The statistical error of accepting the presence of radioactivity when none is present. Sometimes called alpha error. Type II Error The statistical error of failing to recognize the presence of radioactivity when it is present. Sometimes called beta error. 12 ------- APPENDIX A Standard Operating Procedures for the Center for Radioanalysis & Quality Assurance RQA-302 RQA-602 RQA-603 RQA-604 RQA-606 Standard Operating Procedure of Gamma-Ray Detector Systems. Tritium Enrichment Procedure. Standard Operating Procedure for 89Sr and 90Sr in Water, Air Filters and Milk. Standard Operating Procedure of Convention Tritium in Water. Analysis of Plutonium, Uranium, and Thorium in Environmental Samples by Alpha Spectroscopy. 13 ------- APPENDIX B Summary of Analytical Procedures Type of Analysis Analytical Equipment Counting Analytical Period (Min) Procedures Sample Size Approximate Detection Limie HpGe Gammab HpGe detector calibrated at 0.5 keV/ channel (0.04 to 2 MeV range) individual detector. Efficiencies ranging from 15 to 35%. 100 Radionuclide concen- tration quantified from gamma spectral data by online computer program. 3.5L Varies with radionuclides. 3H Automatic liquid scintillation counter 300 Sample prepared by distillation. 5 to 10 mL 300 to 700pCi/L 3H+ Automatic liquid Enrichment scintillation counter (LTHMP samples) a The detection limit is defined as the smallest amount of radioactivity that can be reliably detected, i.e., probability of Type I and Type II error at 5 percent each (DOE 1981). b Gamma spectrometry using a high purity intrinsic germanium (HpGe) detector. 300 Sample concentrated by electrolysis followed by distillation. 250 mL 5 pCi/L Geometry* Matrix Volume Isotope Typical MDA Values for Gamma Spectroscopy (100 minute count time) Marinelli Model Water Density 3.5 Liter Units MDA Isotope Ru-106 Sn-113 Sb-125 1-131 Ba-133 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ce-l44 Eu-152 Ra-226 U-235 Am-241 4.56E+Ol 4.92E+Ol 5.88E+Ol 4.55E+Ol 9.65E+00 4.71E+00 1.07E+0 1 5.38E+00 1.24E+Ol 5.64E+00 9.06E+00 430G 1.0 glrnl pCi/L MDA 4.76E+Ol 8.32E+00 1.65E+0 1 8.28E+00 9. 16E+00 6. 12E+00 6.43E+00 7 .59E+0 1 2.86E+Ol 1.5 8E+0 1 1.01E+02 6.60E+Ol Be-7 K-40 Cr-51 Mn-54 Co-57 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 Disclaimer The MDA's provided are for background matrix samples presumed to contain no known analytes and no decay time. All MDA's provided here are for one specific *Germanium detector and the geometry of interest. The MDA's in no way should be used as a source of reference for determing MDA's for any other type of detector. All gamma spectroscopy MDA's will vary with different types of shielding, geometries, counting times and decay time of sample. 14 ------- |