United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Municipal Environmental Research
Laboratory
Cincinnati OH 45268
EPA-600 2-79-1476
September 1979
&EPA
Research and Development
Managing Small
Water Systems: A
Cost Study
Volume II
-------
RESEARCH REPORTING SERIES
Research reports of the Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, have been grouped into nine series. These nine broad cate-
gories were established to facilitate further development and application of en-
vironmental technology. Elimination of traditional grouping was consciously
planned to foster technology transfer and a maximum interface in related fields.
The nine series are:
1. Environmental Health Effects Research
2. Environmental Protection Technology
3. Ecological Research
4. Environmental Monitoring
5. Socioeconomic Environmental Studies
6. Scientific and Technical Assessment Reports (STAR)
7. Interagency Energy-Environment Research and Development
8. "Special" Reports
9. Miscellaneous Reports
This report has been assigned to the ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TECH-
NOLOGY series. This series describes research performed to develop and dem-
onstrate instrumentation, equipment, and methodology to repair or prevent en-
vironmental degradation from point and non-point sources of pollution. This work
provides the new or improved technology required for the control and treatment
of pollution-sources to meet environmental quality standards.
This document is available to the public through the National Technical Informa-
tion Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161.
-------
EPA-600/2-79-147b
September 1979
MANAGING SMALL WATER SYSTEMS: A COST STUDY
Volume II
by
James I. Gillean
W. Kyle Adams
ACT Systems, Inc.
Winter Park, Florida 32789
Robert M. Clark
Drinking Water Research Division
Municipal Environmental Research Laboratory
Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
Contract No. 68-03-2071
Project Officer
Robert M. Clark
Drinking Water Research Division
Municipal Environmental Research Laboratory
Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
MUNICIPAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY
OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45268
-------
DISCLAIMER
This report has been reviewed by the Municipal Environmental Research
Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and approved for publica-
tion. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the
views and policies of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, nor does
mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or
recommendation for use.
ii
-------
FOREWORD
The Environmental Protection Agency was created because the public and
the federal government were increasingly concerned about the dangers of
pollution on the health and welfare of the American people. Noxious air,
foul water, and spoiled land are tragic testimonies to the deterioration of
our natural environment. The complexity of that environment and the inter-
play among its components require a concentrated and integrated attack on
the problem.
Research and development is that first step in problem solution, and
involves defining the problem, measuring its impact, and searching for
solutions. The Municipal Environmental Research Laboratory develops new
and improved technology and systems: 1) to prevent, treat, and manage
wastewater, solid and hazardous waste, and pollutant discharges from
municipal and community sources; 2) to preserve and treat public drinking
water supplies; and 3) to minimize the adverse economic, social, health,
and aesthetic effects of pollution. This publication is a product of that
research and is a most vital communications link between the researcher and
the user community.
The Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974 establishes primary health-
related standards and secondary aesthetic-related but noneforceable
guidelines for drinking water supplies. These standards will bring about
a fundamental examination of the way water is handled before it is
delivered to the consumer. Many of these changes will have an economic
impact on the affected water utilities. This report provides detailed
information on the current costs of water supply for 23 selected small
water utilities. In addition to providing information on the individual
supplies, data are aggregated to provide projections of the relative impact
of various strategies that might be undertaken to satisfy the Act's
requirements. The data and associated analyses are presented in two
volumes. Volume I is a summary of selected data from the study along with
analyses of the data. Volume II contains detailed in-depth information for
each utility studied.
Francis T. Mayo
Director
Municipal Environmental Research Laboratory
-------
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This two-volume report presents the results of an in-depth review of
the financial data and operations of 23 selected small water utilities
located in the Environmental Protection Agency's Regions III, V, and VI.
Volume II contains basic data for 23 and represents the results from EPA
contract 68-03-2071.
The effort required that 30 small utilities be visited and data ga-
thering attempted. Twenty-three or 77 percent of the utilities provided
data to the level that at least a limited computer printout could be pro-
duced. The data from six of the remaining seven utilities either were not
available or were mixed with other data so that it could not be separated.
At the other utility, no one was available from whom to gather the data.
(The water utility person forgot the appointment.)
Of the 23 utilities from which data were gathered, only 14 (61
percent) had records that provided reasonable detail for ten years of
history. Only 11 (48 percent) had any record of KWH. Generally, it was
possible to obtain or estimate man-hours at small utilities since so few
people were involved. At only three utilities (13 percent) was it
impossible to obtain or estimate the man-hours.
Two (9 percent) of the 23 utilities were privately owned. Very lit-
tle difference existed between the documentation of public and private
owned utilities. The quality of data generally remains constant from
utilities within a state but varies considerably between states. The
Texas utilities had significantly better documented data than the util-
ities from the other states.
Volume I of this report contains a summary of the small utilities'
data, a statistical evaluation of the factors affecting the cost of water
supply, and an evaluation of the cost impact of add-on technologies to sa-
tisfy the requirements of the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA). This repre-
sents an in-house analysis of the data collected under Contract 68-03-
2071.
Data were collected for a 10-year period on the four major operating
and maintenance (O&M) components plus three other significant O&M elements
and the capital costs associated with depreciation and interest. The four
major O&M cost components are support services, acquisition, treatment,
and delivery. Although the three significant O&M elements, chemicals,
payroll and power, are intrinsic to each of the four major components,
they are considered separately in the area of their individual impact on
iv
-------
operating expenses. Depreciation expense for each major cost component is
examined as to its relative capital intensiveness.
The amount of revenue-producing water (RPW) is used in all calcula-
tions because it is the basis of water utility income and is useful in
making comparisons between utilities. At the same time, it can be con-
verted to reflect the total amount of treated water.
Total costs and the amount of RPW on a MGD basis for the latest year
of record are provided for each of the 23 utilities in Table 1. Special
taxes for private utilities such as real property are not included in
these data.
Individual and comparative analyses of the cost variables reveal cer-
tain trends. The distribution category remains the most significant cost
component, though other components have increased more rapidly. Labor
costs represent a significant part of total O&M costs and in many cases
have more than doubled over the study period. A mathematical ratio re-
lates labor cost and productivity to capital productivity and cost. In
this manner, the cost impact of increased output is examined in relation
to payroll and capital expenditures. In addition, the effect of inflation
on the utility budget is also analyzed.
Using historical cost trends and costs of new treatment technologies,
the cost for meeting requirements of the SDWA can be examined. Figure 1
shows the average costs for meeting the requirements of the SDWA. On the
average, the costs for the 23 utilities shows an increase of less than 5
percent; however, extreme increases of more than 100 percent occur, as
discussed in the text of Volume I.
This information in conjunction with the analyses presented in this
volume is intended to aid utility managers in decisions related to in-
creased output, effects of inflation, and implementation of the SDWA re-
quirements.
This report is submitted by ACT Systems, Inc. in fulfillment of
Contract No. 68-03-2071 under the sponsorship of the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency.
-------
TABLE 1. COST ANALYSIS SUMMARY FOR LATEST YEAR OF RECORD
<
H-
Cost Categories ($/mil gal)
Revenue-producing
Utility water Support
(MGD) Services
Down ing town
Great Valley
Honey Brook
Audubon
Manassas
Manassas Park
Culpeper
West Dundee
Algonquin
Lake Zurich
Burlington
Lowell
Lebanon
Batavia
Belton
Georgetown
Taylo-r
Bell County WCID #1
Killeen
Denton
Colony MUD #1
Dallas County WCID #6
Cockrell Hill
0.86
1.05
0.11
0.39
1.25
0.28
0.71
0.34
0.27
0.68
0.06
0.42
0.67
0.13
0.98
0.86
0.78
15.28
4.39
6.35
0.12
0.92
0.28
174
223
34
373
103
303
96
42
71
131
285
173
133
91
122
157
12
62
35
782
199
166
Acquisition
49
223
116
218
135
106
0
159
118
124
152
141
78
317
16
97
28
181
46
386
274
394
Treatment
172
112
38
16
477
0
351
12
21
110
119
117
128
1
13
31
27
1
138
64
0
0
Distribution Interest Total
243
201
94
124
268
72
368
160
307
273
536
671
729
335
290
428
50
230
167
3194
272
204
15
81
119
227
439
135
133
0
264
0
139
116
298
33
58
95
22
94
88
396
203
26
653
840*
401
957+
1423*
616
948
373
715
781
638
1231
1218
1366
778
500
809
139
568
475
4821
948
791
Taxes of $26/mil gal not included
+ Taxes of $2/mil gal not included.
-------
1400- -
CO
§ 1200-
1000- -
o
SB
H
**- £
2.2
v> o
o c
U JI
12
o c
E ?
*£ T3
~n
^ <
w
^ 800-
CO
H
U
*~s
| 600-
H
M
^ 400-
H
O
H
200-
^xx^xxxx^^
8
1O
-------
CONTENTS
Disclaimer ii
Foreword iii
Executive Summary iv
Figures x
Tables x
Abbreviations and Symbols xi
Metric Conversion Table xi
Acknowledgments xii
1. Introduction 1
2. Data Collection, Display, and Utility Selection . 4
3. Region III Water Utilities 6
Downingtown Water Utility 7
Great Valley Water Company 10
Honey Brook Water Utility 10
Audubon Water Company 12
Manassas Water Utility 14
Manassas Park Water Utility 16
Culpeper Water Utility 19
4. Region V Water Utilities 21
West Dundee Water Utility 22
Algonquin Water Utility 22
Lake Zurich Water Utility 25
Burlington Water Utility 28
Lowell Water Utility 28
Lebanon Water Utility 30
Batavia Water Utility 30
5. Region VI Water Utilities 35
Belton Water Utility 36
Georgetown Water Utility 36
Taylor Water Utility 39
Bell County WCID #1 42
Killeen Water Utility 44
Denton Water Utility 44
Colony MUD #1 46
Dallas County WCID #1 48
Cockrell Hill Water Utility 50
References 53
Appendix A. Processed Data for Region III Water Utilities . 54
Appendix B. Processed Data for Region V Water Utilities . . 133
Appendix C. Processed Data for Region VI Water Utilities . . 203
IX
-------
FIGURES
Number Page
1 Average production cost for all utilities with
estimated cost of add-on technology vii
2 Small water utilities studied 2
3 Schematic diagram of Downingtown water system 9
4 Schematic diagram of Great Valley water system .... 11
5 Schematic diagram of Honey Brook water system .... 13
6 Schematic diagram of Audubon water system 15
7 Schematic diagram of Manassas water system 17
8 Schematic diagram of Manassas Park water system. ... 18
9 Schematic diagram of Culpeper water system 20
10 Schematic diagram of Dundee water system 24
11 Schematic diagram of Algonquin water system 26
12 Schematic diagram of Lake Zurich water system 27
13 Schematic diagram of Burlington water system 29
14 Schematic diagram of Lowell water system 31
15 Schematic diagram of Lebanon water system 32
16 Schematic diagram of Batavia water system 34
17 Schematic diagram of Belton water system 38
18 Schematic diagram of Georgetown water system 40
19 Schematic diagram of Taylor water system 41
20 Schematic diagram of Bell County WCID #1 43
21 Schematic diagram of Killeen water system 45
22 Schematic diagram of Denton water system 47
23 Schematic diagram of Colony MUD #1 water system .... 49
24 Schematic diagram of Dallas County WCID #6 water system 51
25 Schematic diagram of Cockrell Hill water system .... 52
TABLES
Number
1 Cost Analysis Summary for Latest Year of Record
2 Region III Small Systems Utilities Profile. . .
3 Region V Small Systems Utilities Profile. . . .
4 Region VI Small Systems Utilities Profile . . .
VI
8
23
37
-------
ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS
Cost
kwh
Maximum day/
maximum hour
MGD
mil gal
Price
Retail service area
RPW
SDWA
Source water
SMSA
Treated water
expense of water production
kilowatt hours
maximum day flow for the year in MGD/maximum
hour flow for the year in MGD
million gallons per day
million gallons
amount charged user
area in which water is retailed by the utility
revenue-producing water. The water measured as
metered consumption and paid for by wholesale and
retail customers in the service area
Safe Drinking Water Act (sometimes refered to
as the Act)
raw water from ground or surface supply
standard metropolitan statistical area
the amount of water treated through the water
utility's treatment plant
METRIC CONVERSION TABLE
English Units
Metric Equivalents
1 foot
1 mile
1 sq mi
1 mil gal
1 $/mil gal
0.305 meters
1.61 kilometers
2.59 sq kilometers
3.79 thou cu meters
0.26 $/thou cu meters
XI
-------
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The cooperation, active support, and sustained interest of many people
made the study described in this report possible. In particular, the fol-
lowing individuals are to be acknowledged.
From the regional offices of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency:
James F. Manwaringj Office of Water Supply
Kogi Suto, Region III
F. Donald Maddox, Region V
Joseph Harrison, Region V
Charles Sever, Region VI
State representatives:
Hugh Eggborn, State of Virginia
John Garland, State of Virginia
Marvin Saillard, State of Illinois
Ernest L. Burcham, State of Indiana
Steve P. Ellison, State of Texas
From the participating water utilities:
Harvey Minnigh, Downingtown Municipal Water Works
Thomas G. Keys, President, Great Valley Water Company
William Freeman, Water Commissioner4 Honey Brook Water Utility
William J. Cheatley, Audubon Water Company
Clyde Wimmer, Director of Public Works, Manassas
Gene Moore, City Manager, Manassas Park
Claude Huffman, Town Manager, Culpeper
Ray Johnson, Superintendent of Public Works, West Dundee
Howard Fish, Water Works Superintendent, Algonquin
Del Hosier, Village Manager, Lake Zurich
John Turk, Plant Operator, Burlington
John Bartholomew, Plant Operator, Town of Lowell
Charles Guard, City Manager, Lebanon
Don Winemiller, Superintendent, Batavia Waterworks
R. K. Utley, City of Belton
Rex Wootan, City of Georgetown
Carl G. White, Manager, Bell County WCID #1
Adolph Grieger, City of Taylor
Otis A. Page, Water Superintendent, Killeen
Earl Jones, Water Superintendent, Denton
xii
-------
Frank D. Graham, District Manager, Colony MUD #1
Wanda Gaddis, Office Manager, Dallas County WCID #6
Cecil W. Thompsonj Water Superintendent City of Cockrell Hill
Special acknowledgments are extended to Mr. Ted Pope, Manager of the
Water Division of Orlando Utilities Commission, Dr. Billy P. Helms,
Assistant Professor of Finance, University of Alabama, and Mr. Nolan Reed,
President of Nolan Reed Associates, Orlando, for providing reviews in the
formative stages of the study and to Gwen Manley, Barbara Melchiore, Miriam
Bondorosky, Rick Rabon, and Dot Loental of ACT Systems for their assistance
with the manuscript.
xiii
-------
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
The SDWA will bring about a fundamental examination of the way
drinking water is handled before it is delivered to the consumer. The
Act establishes primary health-related standards and secondary, but not
enforceable, aesthetic guidelines for drinking water supplies. Throughout
the Act, emphasis is placed on the need to consider the economics of water
delivery.
In response to this need, the Municipal Environmental Research
Laboratory (MERL) of the U.S. EPA Office of Research and Development initi-
ated a two-year study of selected water utilities to collect and analyze
cost data from at least one Class A water utility (revenues greater than
$500,000/ year) in each of the 10 U.S. EPA regions. The results of this
effort are reported in The Cost of Water Supply and Water Utility
Management.
The information developed in this study of the large utilities was
found useful and questions were raised about the costs of water delivery in
small utilities. In 1976, a one-year study was initiated as a pilot
program to determine whether the same types of information could be
obtained from small utilities and documented in a format similar to that
used for the Class A water utilities.
This pilot study was accomplished in EPA Regions III, V, and VI.
Figure 2 identifies the location of the 10 small utilities selected in each
region. Under the program, a personal visit was made to each utility to
ensure data validity. One objective of the effort was to determine the
feasibility of gathering cost and operational information from a utility in
a one-day visit. For this reason, the sample utilities selected were
clustered within an area to comprise approximately a one-week work effort.
It was determined that with appropriate preparation, in-depth information
can be gathered from a small utility in one day.
A computer program was developed utilizing the raw data from each
utility to identify and print out the information to the functional areas
of acquisition, treatment, and delivery. These subsystems are common to
all water supply delivery systems and provide a common base for data
collection. Another category common to all utilities is support services,
the management or administrative function which completes the framework of
an institution that insures an adequate supply of safe drinking water.
This institution is most commonly called a water supply utility.
-------
Figure 2. Small water utilities studied,
-------
Costs are categorized as either operational or capital expenditures.
Operating costs are assigned to the following functional areas: 1) acqui-
sition, 2) treatment, 3) delivery, and 4) support services. The first
three functional areas are related to the physical delivery of water and
the fourth, support services, relates to the overall integrative responsi-
bility of utility management. Operating costs include labor, maintenance,
and materials. For example, if the utility includes a treatment division,
laboratory personnel costs are included in the treatment costs category;
but management costs for the division are included in the support sevices
category. Support services include all administrative and customer
services required to manage the water utility and collect revenues but do
not include services directly related to the physical process of delivering
water.
Capital costs are assumed as depreciation and interest for the plant
in service. Depreciation is based on the historical cost of the facility
divided by its useful life and not on the cost required to reproduce the
facility; therefore, lower costs are associated with the older utilities.
Interest costs are the dollars the utilities must pay for bonds or other
money raising mechanisms.
Revenues are not considered in this report. All of the data reported
relate only to the cost of water supply and do not include broader aspects
related to the elasticity of demand or optimal pricing policies of water
supply. All costs reported are based on RPW pumped by the utility during
the time period covered by the data collected.
This report is prepared in two volumes. Volume I contains summary
information and analyses of the factors affecting the cost of water supply
and Volume II contains the basic data from each selected utility.
-------
SECTION 2
DATA COLLECTION, DISPLAY, AND
UTILITY SELECTION
DATA COLLECTION
All data were collected by a contract representative who visited each
utility and reviewed all information recorded with a utility representa-
tive. In every case, data were collected in the format maintained by the
utility. Where the water utility was maintained as an independent oper-
ation from any other service, it was necessary only to obtain an under-
standing of the information recorded in the financial system along with the
operations of the utility. Where an organization provided water service
along with other serviceSj such as sewerage, it was necessary to identify
and separate the proportion of certain costs attributable to the water ac-
tivities from costs related to other activities. This was accomplished by
working with utility representatives at the utility to identify each line
item containing combined costs. These costs were then allocated to the
water supply operation and to the other operations based on an allocation
technique.
An important reason for direct contact with each utility was to insure
data validity. Direct contact allowed in-depth discussions between the
data collector and utility personnel. This assured that the utility repre-
sentatives had a clear understanding of the program objectives, the analy-
tical techniques and terminology used, and the importance of obtaining
valid information.
At each utility, the procedure followed was to obtain the maximum
amount of data for the past ten years including the latest completed fiscal
year. Many of the utilities visited did not have detailed financial re-
cords of their activities over a ten-year period. At some utilities, de-
tailed records were maintained only for the two preceding years with less
detailed records maintained for an extended period of time. In such cases,
detailed information was obtained as available; and general information was
gathered for the remaining time period.
The data collected in a given utility were analyzed and processed in a
format comparable between utilities. These data were then carefully
evaluated by the data collector to assure that accuracy was maintained in
processing. Results were then reviewed by representatives of each utility,
and changes were made as required to accurately reflect the utility's
operation. As a result of this review, the information received
-------
the approval of the utility management as an accurate reflection of their
system.
DATA DISPLAY
The raw data were keypunched and processed through a computer program.
The appendices contain the printouts for each of the utilities. The print-
out contains 18 pages. In a normal printout fanfold, each time a page is
turned, two pages are in a position to be observed. The printout is so de-
signed that the upper page reflects descriptive information about the data
shown on the page below. The odd-numbered top page contains the same de-
scriptive information regardless of the utility represented. Because of
this repetitionj the odd-numbered pages are included in the appendices only
for the Downingtown system, the first utility printout in Appendix A.
Each utility printout displays all the information useful to the re-
port. Where information was not available at the utility, a double dash
() appears in the display. Under certain conditionSj it was possible to
determine total cost, but such costs could not be assigned to support ser-
vices, acquisition, treatment, and delivery. In these cases, the total
cost appears in its column, but the supportive information for the function
does not appear and is replaced by the double dash. This means that the
total cost is considered accurate, but the detailed information was not
adequate to allocate the cost to the subfunctions.
UTILITY SELECTION
Ten small water utilities in each of the participating EPA Regions
were selected for inclusion in the study. The selection of the 10 util-
ities in each region was made by the respective EPA Regional Water Supply
Office. In most cases, decisions were made in conjunction with state water
supply personnel. After selection, each utility was contacted by telephone
and by letter. Cooperation was obtained, and data were collected and pro-
cessed. The remainder of this report is a description by region of the se-
lected utilities and their processed data.
-------
SECTION 3
REGION III WATER UTILITIES
The EPA Region III Water Supply Office selected five small water
utilities in Virginia and five in Pennsylvania to participate in the study.
The Pennsylvania utilities were selected by the EPA Regional Office and the
Virginia utilities were selected by the EPA Regional Office in conjunction
with the State of Virginia. The following utilities were selected for
implementation.
1. Downingtown Water Utility
Downingtown, PA
2. Great Valley Water Company
Malvern, PA
3. Honey Brook Water Utility
Honeybrook, PA
4. Audubon Water Company
Norristown, PA
5. Manassas Water Utility
Manassas, VA
6. Manassas Park Water Utility
Manassas Park, VA
7. Culpeper Water Utility
Culpeper; VA
8. Borough of Malvern Water Company
Malvern, PA
9. Purcellville Water Utility
Purcellville, VA
10. Leesburg Water Utility
Leesburg, VA
-------
All 10 utilities were visited and cooperated in the study; however,
adequate data to accomplish the objectives of this study were available at
only the first seven of the utilities listed above. Processed data for
these utilities are shown in Appendix A, and each of the seven EPA Region
III utilities is described in this section of the report. Table 2 provides
a general profile of each utility.
DOWNINGTOWN WATER UTILITY
Location and Operation
The Downingtown Water Utility is owned and operated by the Borough of
Downingtownj Pennsylvania, located approximately 25 miles west of
Philadelphia. The water system serves a population of approximately 8,300
people in a retail service area of 3.0 square miles. During the period
from 1966 through 1975, the RPW for the utility decreased 21 percent from
402 mil gal in 1966 to 316 mil gal in 1975. In 1975, the average cost for
RPW was $653/mil gal. Of this amount, 83 percent was O&M expense and the
remainder was depreciation and interest. Because of the decrease in RPW
and accelerating operating cost, the total cost/mil gal increased sig-
nificantly during the past 10 years. In 1966, it cost only $211 (1966
dollars) to produce 1.0 mil gal RPW.
The System
The Downingtown Water Utility utilizes surface water as its source.
The utility has two intakes. One of these, along with a pumping station
which transmits the water to the treatment plant, is located at Beaver
Creek. The other is located at Copeland with the reservoir and treatment
plant. The reservoir and treatment plant have been in existence since 1926
with no major modifications. One hundred percent of the water is subjected
to the following treatment processes: 1) sedimentation, 2) coagulation, 3)
filtration, and 4) chlorination. A small amount of water (about 2 percent)
is also treated with activated carbon. The finished water is supplied to
an open earthen reservoir which has a capacity of 3.75 mil gal. From this
reservoir, water is distributed to the customers. In 1955, a booster pump-
ing station was constructed and in 1965, two elevated ground storage tanks
were added to the system, one in the northern portion of the distribution
system and one in the south. Each of these storage tanks has a capacity of
2.0 mil gal.
Sixty percent of the pipe in the ground was installed prior to 1950
with about 20 percent being installed prior to 1925; 32 percent was in-
stalled between 1950 and 1966; and the remaining 8 percent was installed
during the last 10 years. As can be seen from these figures, the system
has continued to expand physically even though the RPW has decreased.
The Downingtown system is connected with the Whitford Water Company, a
well system, so that treated water can be purchased under emergency condi-
tions. Each year a minimum amount of water is purchased for the purpose of
testing the meters and the connecting facilities. Figure 3 is a simplified
-------
TABLE 2. REGION III - SMALL SYSTEMS UTILITIES PROFILE
oo
Utility
Downingtown
Great Valley
Honey Brook
Audubon
Manassas
Manassas Park
Culpeper
Population
x 1000
8.3
16.5
1.4
6.7
15.0
6.8
7.5
Area
Sq Mi
3.0
40.0
0.8
8.0
2.0
8.0
Accounts
x 1000
1.9
3.3
0.3
1.2
3.1
1.8
2.1
RPW
Mil Gal
316
383
41
142
455
103
260
Percent
Purchased
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
Source
(Ground/
Surface
S
G
G
G
S
G
S (99%)
-------
IfGENO
Pumping
[ [ Treatment
tZj Cle.ir Well
I ' [lev
alert Storage
Creek or River
Reservoir
I I - Distribution
1 _ J Prpssurp Tank
firlhpn
V Well
V / Reaction Basin
I I Pressure filter
Figure 3. Simplified schematic diagram of Downingtown Water Utility.
-------
schematic diagram of the Downingtown Water Utility. The processed data are
in Appendix A.
GREAT VALLEY WATER COMPANY
Location and Operation
The Great Valley Water Company is a privately owned utility with its
headquarters in Malvern, Pennsylvania, 15 miles west of Philadelphia. The
water system serves a population of approximately 16,500 in an estimated 40-
square mile area. This area includes all or part of nine townships. During
the period from 1966 through 1975, the RPW for the utility increased 560 per-
cent from 58 mil gal in 1966 to 383 mil gal in 1975. In 1975, the average
cost for RPW was $840/mil gal not considering the specialized taxes associa-
ted with the private utility. These taxes amounted to $26/mil gal, thus in-
creasing the cost with special taxes to $867/mil gal. Of this amount 67 per-
cent was O&M expense and the remainder was depreciation, interest, and taxes.
The System
The Great Valley Water Company consists of 11 independent systems in-
cluding a total of 20 wells and 17 pumping stations. Water is delivered
directly to the consumer from the pumping stations where the water is drawn
from the wells. Chlorine is added to the water at each of the pumping
stations. At three of the pumping locations there is the capability of
adding Aquadine to sequester iron. Aquadine is added continuously at one
station and periodically at the others, depending upon the condition of the
source water. The largest of the 11 independent systems provides water to
approximately one-half of the service population. This large system con-
tains a 600,000-gal and a 300,000-gal storage tank. Two of the remaining 10
systems also have storage facilities. One of these is an 850,000-gal
storage tank, and the other is a 15,000-gal storage tank. In the remaining
eight systems, all water is pumped directly to the consumer from the well
sites. There is no repumping.
Figure 4 is a simplified schematic diagram of the Great Valley Water
Company system. The processed data are shown in Appendix A. The processed
data reflect the integration of the 11 systems. The systems are independent
only from the standpoint that they are not physically connected. The finan-
cial and operational records are combined. Labor hours, payroll, and chemi-
cal costs were not separately identifiable for 1966 and 1967. No records
were maintained for kwh.
HONEY BROOK WATER UTILITY
Location and Operation
The Honey Brook Water utility is owned and operated by the Borough of
Honey Brook, Pennsylvania, located approximately 20 miles west of
Philadelphia. The water supply system serves a population of approximately
10
-------
IfCtND
I I Ttp.ifmrnl
t1 dm WPII
L_J flPvalPl) Mmjt'.p
Creek nr River
~\ \ - Distribution
I_J Pressiirp T^nfc
\7
V Fjrlhfn Rp>,prvnii
V Well
Rp.irhnn
PIP\I,IIIP hllrr
W.i(p
V
(2 Systems)
(8 Systems)
(1 System)
Figure 4. Simplified schematic diagram of Great Valley Water Company system.
-------
1,400 in a 0.75-square mile service area. During the period 1969 through
1975, the RPW for the utility increased 58 percent from 26 mil gal in 1969
to 41 mil gal in 1975. In 1975, the average cost for RPW was $401/mil gal.
Of this amount, 47 percent was O&M expense and the remainder was deprecia-
tion and interest. The relatively high depreciation and interest are
attributed to the fact that the system was constructed recently.
The System
Originally, the Honey Brook utility was a spring-fed gravity system
with no storage facility. During 1967 and 1968, a new water system was
developed. This new system consists of two well fields each containing two
wells and a standpipe with a capacity of 570,000 gal. One well provides 99
percent of the water and the other wells are used as a back-up. Pumps pull
the water from the well and deliver it directly to the consumers or place it
in storage, depending upon the demand. All water is treated with chlorine
at the well sites.
The utility has only one man on the payroll. Maintenance of the dist-
ribution system is by contract. In 1975, 416 hours of maintenance were re-
quired for the distribution system. Monitoring of the distribution opera-
tion is accomplished by telemetry. Figure 5 is a simplified schematic dia-
gram of the Honey Brook Water Utility. The processed data are in Appendix A.
The processed data reflect information from 1969 through 1975. Data
prior to this time relate to the transition effort and the old system;
therefore, these data are not compatible with the information pertaining to
the new system and are not included in this report. The utility does not
maintain records of kwh usage.
AUDUBON WATER COMPANY
Location and Operation
The Audubon Water Company is a privately owned company with its head-
quarters located in Norristown, Pennsylvania, about 15 miles northwest of
Philadelphia. The water system serves a population of approximately 6,700
in the Norristown area. During the period 1966 through 1975, the RPW for
the utility increased 468 percent from 25 mil gal in 1966 to 142 mil gal in
1975, and the average cost for RPW was $957/mil gal. This cost does not
consider the special taxes associated with private utilities. When the real
property taxes are included, the cost rises to $959/mil gal. Of this amount,
61 percent was for O&M expense and the remainder was depreciation, interest,
and taxes. In 1973, the amount of interest paid by the utility increased
tenfold from approximately $2,000 to $20,000 a year. The increased interest
expense reflects the acquisition of a long-term debt in the principal amount
of $352,000 at 9.5 percent which was required in mid-1973-for expansion.
The System
The Audubon Water Company operates two independent water systems, one
12
-------
UGIND
f J Pumping
| | Trp.ilmpnt
i Well
t [Ipvfltpil
Creph m RIVPT
Reservoir
~\ I Distribution
Pressure
\7
V^ [arlhpn Rpservmt
V Well
\ ___ J Reaction Basin
I _ I Pressure filter
V
v
(2 Well Fields)
2 Wells each
Figure 5. Simplified schematic diagram of Honey Brook Water Utility.
-------
with three wells and the other with seven wells. The water is drawn from
the ground and distributed into the system in one operation by pumps at the
well sites. There is no storage. All water is chlorinated at the well
site. Figure 6 is a simplified schematic diagram of the Audubon water sys-
tem. The processed data are in Appendix A.
From the standpoint of total cost, the financial records of the
Audubon Water Company were complete for the last 10 years. Prior to 1972,
however, cost could not be identified by categories of support services,
acquisition, treatment, and distribution; therefore, only total cost values
are shown prior to 1972. Payroll cost and man-hours prior to 1973 were not
available, and kwh were not maintained prior to 1974.
MANASSAS WATER UTILITY
Location and Operation
The Manassas Water Utility is owned and operated by the City of
Manassas, Virginia, approximately 25 miles southwest of Washington, D. C.
The water system serves a population of approximately 15,000 in an 8.0-
square mile service area. During the period 1972 through 1975, the RPW for
the utility increased 20 percent from 378 mil gal for 1972 to 455 mil gal
for 1975. In 1975, the average cost for RPW was $l,423/mil gal. Of this
amount, 39 percent was O&M expense and the remainder was depreciation and
interest. The high depreciation and interest are attributed to the recent
major capital expenditure discussed in the following subsection.
The System
Originally, Manassas Water Utility acquired its source water from
wells. The old system consisted of as many as 11 wells; however, problems
were encountered in using ground water because of a falling water table.
Construction of a treatment plant and a new dam which created a reservoir
was initiated in 1968 and completed in 1970. With the completion of the
new facilities, the use of ground water was phased out.
The reservoir located on Broad Run has a capacity of 5.7 mil gal and
includes 780 acres of surface area. The water from the reservoir is deli-
vered to a nearby treatment plant which has a present capacity of 4.0 MGD
and is capable of being expanded to 8.0 MGD in the future. One hundred
percent of the water is subjected to the following treatment processes: 1)
aeration, 2) sedimentation, 3) coagulation, 4) filtration, 5) chlorination,
6) activated carbon, and 7) fluoridation. Though not presently in use, the
wells are maintained as a standby source of supply. Occasionally, well
water is used for flushing operations.
Treated water is transmitted approximately 10 miles from the treatment
plant to the city in a 24-inch diameter pipe. During the daytime (the only
hours the treatment plant is normally operated), water is pumped directly
from the treatment plant into the distribution system and into storage. A
ground level reservoir holds 2.5 mil gal, and two elevated tanks hold
14
-------
LfCEND
mping
I 1 Treatment
h~1 Oar Well
L_J [IPlMfd Slni.iPP
_*">» Crfpk nr Bivpr
Vv
^7^ RPIPHOH
| {
I ^ Pressurp T
-------
0.3 mil gal and 0.05 mil gal, respectively. At night, the treatment plant
and pumps at the plant are usually closed down, and water is supplied into
the system by pumps located at the ground level reservoir. Figure 7 is a
simplified diagram of the Manassas Water Utility system. The processed
data are in Appendix A.
In 1970, the utility acquired the Liberia Water System consisting of
predominantly flat rate customers. The switch from ground to surface
water as a source, the acquisition of the new water system with predo-
minantly flat rate customers, and a change in the fiscal year period for
accounting made the financial records prior to the year 1972 difficult to
compare with the records from that point forward. For this reason, the
financial information documented in this report is for the period 1972
through 1975 only. Treatment cost, payroll, and power cost were
identifiable as separate items for only the two latest years. No record
of kwh was maintained.
MANASSAS PARK WATER UTILITY
Location and Operation
The Town of Manassas Park, Virginia, located approximately 20 miles
southwest of Washington, D. C., owns and operates the water supply system.
The system serves a population of approximately 6,800 in a 2.0-square mile
service area. During the period 1966 through 1975, the RPW for the
utility increased 37 percent from 75 mil gal in 1965 to 103 mil gal in
1974. In 1974, the average cost for RPW was $616/mil gal. Of this
amount, 51 percent was O&M expense and the remainder was depreciation and
interest.
The System
The Manassas Park Water Utility consists of four wells, an elevated
storage tank, and a distribution system. No treatment of any type is
performed on the water distributed into the system. In the processed data
shown in Appendix A, the water identified as treated water is actually the
amount of water withdrawn from the wells and pumped into the distribution
sys tern.
The system maintains a connection with the Manassas Water utility in
order to obtain water under emergency conditions; however, this connection
is seldom used. Figure 8 is a simplified schematic diagram of the
Manassas Park water system.
From an operations and accounting standpoint, the Manassas Park Water
Utility is combined with the sewer system and in some cases with the
streets sanitation, and parks departments, all served by one maintenance
shop. Because of this, it was necessary to make some assumptions in
identifying specific costs. Since no treatment occurs, no costs are
incurred in the treatment category. The utility does not maintain records
of kwh used.
16
-------
LEGEND
o --.
I I Treatment
\~~\ Clear Well
L_J Elevated Storage
=r^^
Creek or Ruer
Resenoir
I | Distribution
L3 Pressure Tank
Earthen Rpsprvoif
V Well
\___/ ReacMon Basin
I _ I Preuurp filter
Storage
Treated Water
Figure 7. Simplified schematic diagram of Manassas Water Utility system.
-------
LFGtNO
00
f J Pumpins
I I Treatment
II Clear Well
L_J Flpi.ilfrt SI
orjje
Creek or River
d«sei»oir
| | Distrihulion
L_3 Pressure Tank
V
V Earthpn RPSPTVOIT
V Well
\ j Reaction Ba^in
I 1 Preunrp (iller
Treated Wale
V
(4 Wells)
Figure 8. Simplified schematic diagram of Manassas Park Water Utility.
-------
CULPEPER WATER UTILITY
Location and Operation
The Culpeper Water Utility is owned and operated by the City of
Culpeper, Virginia, approximately 60 miles southwest of Washington, D. C.
The water system serves a population of approximately 7,500 in an
8.0-square mile service area. During the period 1966 through 1975, the
RPW of the utility increased 78 percent from 146 mil gal in 1966 to 260
mil gal in 1975. In 1975, the average cost for RPW was $948/mil gal. Of
this amount, 73 percent was O&M expense and the remainder was depreciation
and interest.
The System
The Culpeper Water Utility acquires all water from a free-flowing
stream through an intake located at its treatment plant. Two reservoirs
located upstream from the treatment facility stabilize the flow of the
stream. The utility incurs no operating or depreciation expenses from the
reservoirs since they were built with federal funds for flood control. A
small well located at the treatment plant provides raw water into the
water supply intake when additional water is required. The small well
operates approximately 20 days per year and supplies about one percent of
the total water. There is also a larger well for use in an emergency.
There has been no occasion to use this larger well in 15 years.
Raw water from the intake flows directly into the treatment plant.
All water is subjected to the following treatment processes: 1)
sedimentation, 2) coagulation, 3) filtration, 4) chlorination, and 5)
flouridation. The system experiences a periodic iron and manganese
problem. This is a seasonal problem and is believed to be a result of
eutrophic conditions found in the lake located about one mile above the
intake. The iron and manganese often impart a yellowish-brown-to-black
color to the water and tend to precipitate in the mains.
All pumping is accomplished at the treatment plant. The pumps move
water into the distribution system under pressure and deliver it directly
to the consumer. Additional water is stored in three separate 0.5-mil gal
elevated storage tanks.
The Culpeper Water Utility converted to a computerized billing system
in mid-FY 1973-74, providing complete billing records for FY 1974-75.
These records show RPW amounted to 259,844 mil gal as compared with the
treatment plant records for the same year showing 477,010 mil gal of water
treated. These figures indicate a water loss of 46 percent which is
unusually high.
Figure 9 is a simplified schematic diagram of the Culpeper water
system. The processed data acquired from the system are in Appendix A.
The utility did not maintain a record of kwh usage.
19
-------
IfGfNO
ho
O
( J Pumping
I _ I Treatment
Clear Well
L_J Elevated Storage
1 Cr«k or Ri»pr
I | Dislnhulion
' i Pressure Tank
V
V Earthen Reservoir
V Well
\ / Reaclion Basin
I 1 Prf;sliif filter
Moiaje
treated Water
Figure 9. Simplified schematic diagram of Culpeper Water Utility.
-------
SECTION 4
REGION V WATER UTILITIES
The EPA Region V Water Supply Office elected to have four small water
supply systems in the Cincinnati area and five in the Chicago area
participate in the program. The specific utilities were selected by the
EPA in conjunction with appropriate state water supply personnel. Four of
the water supply utilities in the Chicago area are in Illinois and one in
Indiana. All of the utilities in the Cincinnati area are in Ohio. The
utilities selected to participate in the program are as follows.
1. West Dundee Water Utility
West Dundeej IL
2. Algonquin Water Utility
Algonquin4 IL
3. Lake Zurich Water Utility
Lake Zurich, IL
4. Burlington Water Utility
Burlington, IL
5. Lowell Water Utility
Lowell, IN
6. Lebanon Water Utility
Lebanon, OH
7. Batavia Water Utility
Batavia, OH
8. Williamsburg Water Works
Williamsburg, OH
9. Warren County Water Department
Lebanon, OH
21
-------
All nine utilities were visited and cooperated in the program; however,
adequate data to accomplish the objectives of this program were available at
only the first seven of the utilities listed above. The processed data for^
the seven utilities are shown in Appendix B. Each of the EPA Region V util-
ities for which data were processed is described in this section of the re-
port. Table 3 provides a general profile of each utility.
WEST DUNDEE WATER UTILITY
Location and Operation
The West Dundee Water Utility is owned and operated by the City of West
Dundee, Illinois, located approximately 20 miles west of Chicago. The water
system serves a population of approximately 3,500 in a 0.7-square mile ser-
vice area. During the period 1969 through 1975, the RPW for the utility
increased 12 percent from 112 mil gal in 1969 to 125 mil gal in 1975. In
1975, the average cost for RPW was $373/mil gal. Of this amount, 79 percent
was O&M expense and the remainder was depreciation.
The System
The West Dundee Water Utility draws its source water from two well
fields. Ninety-seven percent of the water utilized in the system comes from
one well field with the other system primarily providing back-up. At the
primary well site, the raw water is chlorinated, fluoridated, and aerated.
At the other well site, the water is chlorinated and fluoridated only. The
water is pumped directly from the wells into the distribution system. There
is also a 100,000-gal elevated storage tank within the distribution system.
Figure 10 is a simplified schematic diagram of the West Dundee water system.
The processed data are in Appendix B.
A combined water and sewer fund is maintained in West Dundee. Informa-
tion was available from only 1969 forward and was in such a format that it
was difficult to identify costs to the level of support services, acquisi-
tion, treatment, and distribution. Because of this, only total O&M cost is
provided for all years except the latest year, 1975. The utility did not
maintain records of labor man-hours. Information such as power cost and kwh
were available for only the year prior to 1969 and are included in the
processed data.
ALGONQUIN WATER UTILITY
Location and Operation
The Algonquin Water Utility is owned and operated by the City of
Algonquin, Illinois, located approximately 20 miles west of Chicago. The
water system serves a population of about 4,000 in a 2.5-square mile service
area. During the period 1965 through 1974, the RPW for the utility increased
by 39 percent from 70 mil gal in 1965 to 97 mil gal in 1974. In 1974, the
average cost for RPW was $115/mil gal. Of this amount, 84 percent was O&M
22
-------
TABLE 3. REGION V - SMALL SYSTEMS UTILITIES PROFILE
U>
Utility
West Dundee
Algonquin
Lake Zurich
Burlington
Lowe 1 1
Lebanon
Batavia
Population
x 1000
3.5
4.0
6.8
0.4
5.3
10.0
2.1
Area
Sq Mi
0.7
2.5
3.5
0.3
4.0
6.7
2.1
Accounts
x 1000
1.0
1.2
2.0
0.1
1.6
2.5
0.6
RPW
Mil Gal
125
97
249
21
152
246
47
Percent
Purchased
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Source
(Ground/
Surface
G
G
G
G
G
G
S
-------
UCfND
C ) Pumpin
I I Treatme
nt
Clear Well
L_) flfv.ilrd Stnriee
Creek or River
I [ Oistcihulion
L_3 Prtssurp Tank
n Rpsprvnir
V ttpll
\ _ J Reaction Ba^m
I _ | Prptuirr Fillpr
Irpjtfrt
(2 Well Fields)
Figure 10. Simplified schematic diagram of West Dundee Water Utility.
-------
expense and the remainder was depreciation and interest.
The System
The Algonquin Water Utility acquires its source water from two well
fields. The water from one well field flows into an infiltration gallery
and then into a 40,000-gal collection reservoir. During this process,
chlorinej fluoride, and polyphosphate are added. High service pumps draw
from the collection reservoir and pump the water into the distribution
system. At the other well field, water is pumped directly into the distri-
bution system after chlorine and polyphosphate are added. The distribution
system contains three standpipes which have a storage capacity of 450,000
gal, 390,000 gal, and 175,000 gal, respectively. Figure 11 is a simplified
schematic diagram of the system. The processed data appear in Appendix B.
Cost data were available over the entire 10-year period, but the record
system was not adequate to identify these costs as support services,
acquisition, treatment, or distribution cost for any given year; therefore,
the O&M costs are given as annual totals only on the cost summary report
normally produced to identify the cost/mil gal of support services,
acquisition, treatment, and distribution. Man-hours were available for only
the two latest years and kwh records for only the latest year.
LAKE ZURICH WATER UTILITY
Location and Operation
The Lake Zurich Water Utility is owned and operated by the Village of
Lake Zurich, Illinois, located about 20 miles west of Chicago. The water
system serves a population of approximately 6,800 in a 3.5-square mile ser-
vice area. During the period 1968 through 1975, the RPW for the utility
increased 38 percent from 181 mil gal in 1968 to 249 mil gal in 1975. In
1975, the average cost for RPW was $781/mil gal. Of this amount, 44 percent
was O&M expense and the remainder was depreciation and interest.
The System
The Lake Zurich utility acquires its source water from four wells.
Under normal operating conditions, three of the four wells provide an
adequate source of water. The water is pulled from the wells, treated with
chlorine and polysulfate, and pumped directly into the distribution system.
The distribution system contains three storage facilities: two elevated
tanks with capacities of 58,000 and 500,000 gal respectively, and a
500,000-gal standpipe. Figure 12 is a simplified schematic diagram of the
Lake Zurich water system. The processed data appear in Appendix B.
The financial records of the utility were maintained in a format inte-
grating water utility costs with the sewer system and other municipal costs.
Because of this, it was difficult to identify costs to the level of support
services, acquisition, treatment, and distribution. Only the total cost was
obtained for the years 1969 through 1974. More detailed records were
25
-------
LEGEND
f J Pumping
I I tre.itment
II Clear Wpll
(__] [Ipnifrt Storaee
»i Rufr
| j Oistrihution
L_3 Pressure Tank
\7
V Earthen Reservoir
V Well
\ / Reaction Basin
I J Pressure Filter
Morale
Irtaterl Water
V
Figure 11. Simplified schematic diagram of Algonquin Water Utility system.
-------
IEGIND
r j Pumping
I I Trpatmrril
b| Clear Well
I ] Elevated Stnrage
n Rivpr
Reservoir
I [ Distribution
I i Pressure lank
Earthen Reset»oir
V Well
\___y Reaclinn Basin
I I Prcuiiie Filler
^*^.S^ btOUfP
Treated WS|PI
(4 Wells)
Figure 12. Simplified schematic diagram of Lake Zurich Water Utility.
-------
available for the latest year (1975) allowing for the allocation of costs.
Payroll cost and man-hours were not available for any year; power cost and
utilization of kwh were available for the latest year only.
BURLINGTON WATER UTILITY
Location and Operation
The Burlington Water Utility is owned and operated by the Village of
Burlington, Illinois, located 20 miles west of Chicago. The water system
serves a population of 384 in a 0.25-square mile service area. During the
period 1966 through 1975, the RPW of the utility decreased 9 percent from 22
mil gal in 1966 to 20 mil gal in 1975. In 1975, the average cost for RPW
was $638/mil gal. Of this amount, 82 percent was O&M expense and the re-
mainder was depreciation.
The System
The Burlington Water Utility obtains its source water from one well.
The raw water is treated with chlorine, Aquadine, and fluoride and then
stored in a 55,000-gal ground storage reservoir. The water is pumped from
the reservoir through a 3,500-gal pressure tank and into the distribution
system. Figure 13 is a simplified schematic presentation of the Burlington
water system. The processed data are in Appendix B.
Records were not maintained of the number of kwh utilized by the util-
ity. Chemical costs prior to 1969 could not be separated or identified.
LOWELL WATER UTILITY
Location and Operation
The Lowell Water Utility is owned and operated by the City of Lowell,
Indiana, located approximately 15 miles south of Gary, Indiana. The water
system serves a population of approximately 5,300 in a four-square mile
service area. During the period 1966 through 1975, the RPW of the utility
increased 65 percent from 92 mil gal in 1966 to 152 mil gal in 1975. In
1975, the average cost for RPW was $l,231/mil gal. Of this amount, 76
percent was O&M expense and the remainder was depreciation and interest.
The System
The Lowell utility acquires water from three wells, each approximately
280 feet deep. The water is pumped from the wells, aerated, chlorinated,
and stored in one of two 60,000-gal reaction basins. Three high service
pumps move the water from the basins through pressure filters and into the
distribution system. The purpose of the sand pressure filters is to remove
sulfur from the water. There are two 200,000-gal elevated storage tanks in
the distribution system.
28
-------
IfCfNO
VO
PumpiriR
1 J Treatment
til Clp.ii Wpll
I J [Imlrrt Stnr
agp
Creek or River
Reservoir
| | Distribution
l_] Pressure Tank
v/
V Earthen Rpsprvnir
V Well
\ / Reaction (U'.in
L J Prpsswe f iltpi
Treated Water
Figure 13. Simplified schematic presentation of Burlington Water Utility
system.
-------
A simplified schematic diagram of the system is shown in Figure 14 and
the processed data are in Appendix B.
The Lowell Water Utility uses a single entry bookkeeping system to
document financial information. Records for total costs were available for
the entire time period of the study; however, sufficient details to allocate
expenses to support services, acquisition, treatment, and distribution were
available for only 1974 and 1975. A record of kwh was maintained; however,
the 1967 data were not available.
LEBANON WATER UTILITY
Location and Operation
The Lebanon Water Utility is owned and operated by the City of Lebanon,
Ohio, located approximately 15 miles northeast of Cincinnati. The water
system serves a population of approximately 10,000 in a 6.7-square mile
service area. During the period 1966 through 1975, the RPW of the utility
decreased 18 percent from 299 mil gal in 1966 to 246 mil gal in 1975. In
1975, the average cost for RPW was $l,218/mil gal. Of this amount, 54 per-
cent was O&M expense and the remainder was depreciation and interest.
The System
The Lebanon Water Utility acquires its source water from the ground. At
the time of the study, the operation included six wells; however, two were
scheduled to be closed down. Water is pumped from the wells into a treatment
plant where it is chlorinated and passed through sand filters and a coke
aerator. The water then flows into a 300,000-gal clear well. High service
pumps lift the water from the clear well into the first pressure level area
of the distribution system. Two of four booster pumps located at the clear
well move water into the second pressure level area and one moves water
directly from the first level to the third pressure level. One booster pump
is on standby. Two additional pumps located in the system move water from
the second pressure level into the third pressure level area of the
distribution system. The three storage facilities in the system consist of
two 0.5-mil gal standpipes and one 1.0-mil gal storage tank.
Figure 15 is a simplified diagram of the Lebanon water system. The
processed data are in Appendix B.
In general, all necessary data were available; however, the total cost
for chemicals was identifiable for only the years 1974 and 1975.
BATAVIA WATER UTILITY
Location and Operation
The Batavia Water Utility is owned and operated by the Village of
Batavia, Illinois, located approximately 25 miles west of Chicago. The water
30
-------
ICGEND
Pumpine
f | Tr
eatment
tU Clear Well
' ' [levaleit Storage
=r^-^
N Creek or River
Reservoir
. I I Distribution
L_D Pressure Tank
^f Earthen Reservoir
V Well
\ J Reaction Basin
I I Pressure Filler
Morale
Ireateit Water
(3 Wells)
Figure 14. Simplified schematic diagram of Lowell Water Utility.
-------
UCIHO
Pumping
I _ I Trrjtmtnt
tlj Clm W»H
L_) flojlfd Slorajt
Ciefk 01 Rixr
Reservoir
-| I Distribution
l__J Pressure link
V fiilhen Re^er.oir
V Well
\ 1
\ I Reaction Bjsin
I 1 Piesime lilln
O<-,.
Figure 15. Simplified diagram of Lebanon Water Utility.
-------
system serves a population of about 2,100 in a 2.10-square mile service
area. During the period 1966 through 1975, the RPW of the utility de-
creased by 6 percent from 50 mil gal in 1966 to 47 mil gal in 1975. In
1975, the average cost of RPW was $l,366/mil gal. Of this amount, 68
percent was O&M expense and the remainder was depreciation and interest.
The System
The Batavia water system uses surface water drawn from a natural
stream by three intake pumps with a total capacity of 350 gal/minute. All
water is subjected to the following treatment processes: 1) sedimenta-
tion, 2) filtration, and 3) chlorination. The intake pumps move the raw
water directly into one of two 90,000-gal carbonation chambers which have
a four-hour retention time. The water then flows through filters and into
a 150,000-gal clear well. There are four filter beds, each with 96 square
feet of surface area. Two 750-gal/ minute high service pumps draw the
water from the clear well and pump it into the distribution system.
Storage facilities in the distribution system consist of two ground
storage tanks with a capacity of 150,000 gal and 100,000 gal,
respectively.
A simplified schematic presentation of the system is shown in Figure
16 and the processed data are in Appendix B.
Documented cost information was available for the years 1970 through
1975; however, sufficient information to identify costs to the level of
support services, acquisition, treatment, and distribution was available
for only the two latest years. Some information, such as water consump-
tion and manhours, was available for the entire 10-year period and is
included in the computer reports.
33
-------
UCENO
f J Pumping
I I [rpalmpnf
\~~\ Cleat Well
' ' Eleifllerl Slnr.)Ep
' Creek or River
Reservoir
L._! Presiiire T^nlt
\7
V fjrlhpn RPSPI»Dir
V Well
\ / Reaction Basin
Pip'.MI IP Fill pi
SloiaRp
Figure 16. Simplified schematic presentation of Batavia Water Utility.
-------
SECTION 6
REGION VI WATER UTILITIES
The EPA Region VI Water Supply Office elected to have 10 small water
utilities in the State of Texas participate in this program. These utili-
ties were selected by the EPA Regional Office in conjunction with Texas
state water personnel. The following utilities were selected for
participation.
1. Belton Water Utility
Belton, TX
2. Georgetown Water Utility
Georgetown, TX
3. Taylor Water Utility
Taylor, TX
4. Bell County WCID #1
Killeen, TX
5. Killeen Water Utility
Killeen, TX
6. Denton Water Utility
Denton, TX
7. Colony MUD #1
Denton County, TX
8. Dallas County WCID #6
Dallas, TX
9. Cockrell Hill Water Utility
Cockrell Hill, TX
10. Lewisville Water Utility
Lewisville, TX
35
-------
All 10 utilities were visited and adequate data were collected at the
first nine utilities listed to accomplish the objectives of this program.
The processed data for these nine utilities are included in Appendix C.
Each EPA Region VI utility for which data were processed is described in
this section of the report. Table 4 provides a general profile of each
utility.
BELTON WATER UTILITY
Location and Operation
The Belton Water Utility is owned and operated by the City of Belton,
Texas located 20 miles west of Temple, Texas. The water system serves a
population of approximately 10,650 in a 6.88-square mile service area.
During the period 1970 through 1975, the RPW for the utility increased 31
percent from 273 mil gal for 1970 to 358 mil gal for 1975. In 1975, the
average cost for RPW was $778/mil gal. Of this amount, 93 percent was O&M
expense and the remainder was depreciation and interest.
The System
Originally, the Belton Water Utility was a well system; however, in
1970 the system started purchasing treated water from Bell County WCID #1.
The contract to purchase water from the Bell County system requires a fixed
monthly payment plus a fee/1000 gal. In 1975, the monthly fixed payment was
$6,190.19 and the fee was $0.095/1000 gal. The total amount paid for pur-
chased water that year was $113,327.
Bell County WCID #1 owns and maintains a 4.0-mil gal storage tank.
Water flows by gravity through a four-mile pipeline to the City system. The
Belton utility maintains an 800,000-gal ground storage tank for emergency
purposes. Basically, the water flows by gravity from the WCID #1 storage
tank directly to the consumer. The water is rechlorinated by the Belton
utility after it is received from Bell County. Figure 17 is a simplified
schematic presentation of the Belton water system. Processed data are in
Appendix C.
The data obtained from the utility begin with the year 1970, concurrent
with the establishment of the new water system utilizing purchased water.
The amount of treated water (purchased water) was available for the latest
year only.
GEORGETOWN WATER UTILITY
Location and Operation
The Georgetown Water Utility is owned and operated by the City of
Georgetown, Texas, located approximately 20 miles southwest of Temple. The
system serves a population of about 10,000 in a 6.02-square mile service
area.
36
-------
TABLE 4. REGION VI - SMALL SYSTEMS UTILITIES PROFILE
Utility
Belton
Georgetown
Taylor
Bell County WCID #1
Killeen
Denton
Colony MUD #1
Dallas County WCID #6
Cockrell Hill
Population
x 1000
10.6
10.0
9.6
40.4
46.8
1.6
13.8
3.5
Area
Sq Mi
6.9
6.0
10.2
2.8
32.3
0.4
7.0
1.0
Accounts
x 1000
3.3
2.8
3.5
0.042
11.0
11.6
0.5
3.8
1.0
RPW
Mil Gal
358
314
286
5,579
1,601
2,318
43
337
102
Percent
Purchased
100%
0
0
100%
100%
100%
0
100%
100%
Source
(Ground/
Surface
S
G
G
S
S
S (98%)
G
S
S
-------
U)
00
UCfNO
r J Pumpinj
I _ I Treatme
nt
Clear Well
LJ Elevated Storage
.."^X Crpph or River
V>
*^\ Reservoir
I I Distribution
I i Piessure Tank
V
V tarthen Reservoir
V Well
\ / Reaction Basin
I I Pressure Filtei
Morale
Treated Walei
Figure 17. Simplified schematic presentation of Belton Water Utility system.
-------
percent from 462 mil gal in 1971 to 314 mil gal in 1975. In 1975, the
average cost for RPW was $500/mil gal. Of this amount, 79 percent was O&M
expense and the remainder was depreciation and interest.
The System
The Georgetown Water Utility acquires its source water from four
wells. The water is pumped from the wells, chlorine is added, and the
water is moved to a 200tOOO-gal clear well. From the clear well, water is
pumped into a 750,000-gal storage tank and into the distribution system by
four pumps all located at the clear well.
Figure 18 is a simplified schematic presentation of the Georgetown
water system. The processed data are in Appendix C.
Cost data for O&M were available from 1968; however, the amount of
RPW was not available prior to 1971. Chemical cost was not identifiable
as a separate line item. Power cost and kwh were available for the two
latest years only.
TAYLOR WATER UTILITY
Location and Operation
The Taylor Water Utility is owned and operated by the City of Taylor,
Texas, located approximately 20 miles south of Temple. The water system
serves a population of approximately 9,600 in a 10.24-square mile service
area. During the period from 1966 through 1975, the RPW for the utility
increased 54 percent from 186 mil gal in 1966 to 286 mil gal in 1975. In
1975, the average cost for RPW was $809/mil gal. Of this amount, 60
percent was O&M expense and the remainder was depreciation and interest.
The System
The utility obtains its raw water from four wells ranging in depth
from 3,000 to 3,300 feet. Water is pumped from the wells to one of two
ground storage reservoirs, both at one central location. Chlorine is
added to the water just prior to storage. There is also a 1.0-mil gal raw
water storage tank at one of the well sites and water from this tank also
is pumped to the two centrally located reservoirs. Three distribution
pumps move the water from the reservoirs through the distribution system.
Two elevated storage tanks in the distribution system have a capacity of
400,000 and 500,000 gal, respectively.
Figure 19 is a simplified schematic diagram of the Taylor water
system. The processed data are in Appendix C.
Information related to treated water (the amount of water pumped from
the wells) was available for the latest year only. Records of kwh usage
were available for only the last five years.
39
-------
.c-
o
UGfNO
f J Pumping
I _ I frenfmpnl
h~1 a, w>ii
L__) (iPt.ilfd Slnrj
Crffk ni Rivpr
-ff-
Cb r,,,,,,,, T,m
V
V tiutnpn Rpsmnir
V Wfll
V~~7 » , «
X- ./ Kracnnn o^sin
1 1 Pressure Filtpr
Figure 18. Simplified schematic presentation of Georgetown Water Utility system.
-------
LEGEND
f J Pumping
I I Treatment
td Clear Well
LJ Elev
ated Storage
Creed or River
Reservoir
| I Distribution
L_D Pressure Tank
Earthen Reservoir
V Well
\___y Reaction Basin
I 1 Pressure Fillet
o
Storage
Treated Water
Figure 19. Simplified schematic presentation of Taylor Water Utility system.
-------
BELL COUNTY WCID #1
Location and Operation
The Bell County Water Collection and Improvement District (WCID) #1
operates in Bell County, Texas with its headquarters in the City of
Killeen. The water system provides water to a total of 42 customers,
including seven major water systems (six municipal systems plus Fort
Hood). Water is wholesaled to the municipal systems and provided to Fort
Hood at no cost. Although water is furnished to Fort Hood at no cost,
this water is considered as RPW because the arrangement is part of the
lease agreement. The remaining connections are primarily minor connec-
tions, such as farms crossed by the distribution pipeline. Essentially,
the water district does not include a distribution system, but furnishes
water to consumers through their own distribution systems. During the
period 1966 through 1975, the RPW of the utility increased 79 percent from
3,120 mil gal in 1966 to 5,579 mil gal in 1975. In 1975, the average cost
for RPW was $139/mil gal. Of this amount, 73 percent was O&M expense and
the remainder was depreciation and interest.
The System
A large portion of the original system was built by the U. S. Army to
provide water to Fort Hood. The Army now leases the system to Bell County
WCID #1 which operates, maintains, and improves the equipment and facil-
ities. In return, the Army is paid for the lease and also receives water
for Fort Hood at no cost.
The district purchases from the Brazos River Authority all raw water
except that supplied to the Fort Hood Army Base. Water for Fort Hood is
received at no cost.
Water is drawn from an impoundment on the Brazos River and lifted ap-
proximately 135 feet to the treatment plant located on a bluff near the
impoundment. All water undergoes the following treatment processes: 1)
sedimentation, 2) coagulation, 3) filtration, 4) chlorination, and 5)
fluoridation. Following this treatment, the water flows into a clear well
and is pumped into the transmission main. The City of Killeen and Fort
Hood are located at the end of the 17-mile transmission line. There are
three storage tanks in the WCID #1 system. A 4.0-mil-gal storage tank
located near the treatment facility is connected to the Belton Water
Utility through a 4-mile pipeline owned by WCID #1. Two elevated storage
tanks with a capacity of 5.0 mil gal each are located near Killeen at the
end of the transmission system.
Two booster stations, one located about midway on the pipeline and
the other near the City of Killeen, move the water through the trans-
mission line. Figure 20 is a simplified schematic presentation of the Bell
County WCID #1 water system. The processed data are in Appendix C.
The costs associated with this water system are somewhat different
42
-------
-C-
U>
UCfNO
Q J Pumping
I I Treatment
t~~l Clea.rWell
L_J [Ifyjl
led Storage
» Creek or Riier
Reservoir
-\ \ Distribution
L_D Pressure land
Earthen Reservoir
V Well
\ / Reaction Basin
I I Pressure filter
<^^> Mora
rage
Treated Water
rvJ
Figure 20. Simplified schematic presentation of Bell County WCID #1 water system.
-------
from the lease rather than as depreciated capital. The cost of the lease
is included as a part of O&M cost. Depreciation is for the improvement
and expansion of the facilities implemented by the Bell County WCID.
Financial records were maintained to the depth required for identifying
support services, acquisition, treatment, and distribution costs for the
latest five years only. The O&M costs prior to 1971 are shown as totals.
The utility did not maintain records of kwh utilization.
KILLEEN WATER UTILITY
Location and Operation
The Killeen Water Utility is owned and operated by the City of
Killeen, Texas, located 20 miles west of Temple. The system serves a
population of approximately 40,350 in a 2.8-square mile service area.
During the period 1967 through 1975, the RPW for the utility increased 66
percent from 966 mil gal in 1967 to 1,601 mil gal in 1975. In 1975, the
average cost for RPW was $568/mil gal. Of this amount, 75 percent was O&M
expense and the remainder was depreciation and interest.
The System
The Killeen utility acquires all of its water from Bell County
WCID #1. Treated water is supplied into the Killeen system through three
connections to the WCID #1 transmission lines. Each of the connection
points provides water to ground storage reservoirs with capacities of
0.25, 2.0, and 11.0 mil gal, respectively. A separate pumping station
moves water from each of the reservoirs into the lower distribution plane
and into a storage reservoir with a capacity of 0.4 mil gal. From this
reservoir, another pumping station moves the water to a higher distri-
bution plane. There are four elevated storage tanks in the distribution
system. Three of these tanks located in the lower distribution plane have
a capacity of 1.0, 0.5, and 0.25 mil gal, respectively. The fourth sto-
rage tank is located in the higher distribution plane and has a capacity
of 0.5 mil gal. Figure 21 is a simplified schematic diagram of the
Killeen water system. The processed data are in Appendix C.
Financial records reflecting the operational cost of the system were
available for only nine of the 10 years studied. Because adequate records
were not available, no cost information is given for the year 1966.
Records of kwh usage were not maintained by the utility.
DENTON WATER UTILITY
Location and Operation
The Denton Water Utility is owned and operated by the City of Denton,
Texas, located 15 miles northeast of Dallas. The system serves a popu-
lation of about 46,800 in a 32.3-square mile service area. During the
44
-------
UCIND
Oi
Pumping
LJ ir"im"it
tU Clfar WP!|
Qi^«.w
' Crffli or Ri»fi
-| ^ - flistrihntinn
' Prf^iirr T^nh
\7
V Farlhfi P*1^'rvnir
V W.ll
V^ I Rf^rlinn B,vm
I 1
I I PrruHie fillpf
Figure 21. Simplified schematic presentation of Killeen Water Utility System.
-------
period 1966 through 1975, the RPW for the utility increased 57 percent from
1,477 mil gal in 1966 to 2,318 mil gal in 1975. In 1975, the average cost
for RPW was $475 /mil gal. Of this amount, 55 percent was O&M expense and
the remainder was depreciation and interest.
The System
The utility acquires approximately 98 percent of its raw water from a
surface source and about 2 percent from a ground source. The surface
source is the Garza-Little Elm Reservoir where the utility has rights to
store 21,000 acre feet of water and to divert 11,000 acre feet annually.
The reservoir is located approximately 12 miles southeast of the City. In
addition, the Denton utility has a contractual arrangement with the City of
Dallas to withdraw annually from the same reservoir a specified amount of
Dallas' raw water. On an annual basis, this equals an average of 13 MGD.
This contract will expire in 1980. The utility also maintains seven wells
in usable condition.
Denton's raw water intake structure is located on the Hickory Creek arm
of the Garza-Little Elm Reservoir. The water flows by gravity from the re-
servoir down Hickory Creek and is removed at the intake which has a capacity
of 60 MGD. The treatment plant is located near the intake in the south-
eastern area of the town. All water is subjected to the following treatment
processes: 1) sedimentation, 2) filtration, 3) chlorination, and 4) fluor-
idation. Approximately 20 percent of the water is subjected to an activated
carbon process. High service pumps move the water out of the treatment
plant into the distribution system. Distribution system storage tanks with
capacities of 0.36, 1.0, and 2.0 mil gal, respectively are maintained at
three locations within the service area. Two elevated storage tanks are
located in the distribution system and booster pumping stations are located
throughout the City. Figure 22 is a simplified schematic presentation of
the Denton water system and the processed data are in Appendix C.
The Denton Water Utility delivers raw water to the power plant at the
same rate charged for treated water; therefore, the RPW shown includes some
water that was not treated. Because of this, the ratio of RPW to treated
water is unusually high; in fact, RPW exceeded treated water for the year
1974.
Information relating to the usage of kwh was not available. For other
than the latest year, the O&M information available did not allow accurate
allocation to the functions of acquisition, treatment, distribution, and
support services; therefore, only total cost is shown in the processed data.
COLONY MUD #1
Location and Operation
The Colony Municipal Utility District (MUD) #1 is owned by the citizens
residing in the district, a political subdivision of the State of Texas.
46
-------
LEGEND
Pumping
I I Trealmei
nt
Clear Well
Q Elev
ated Storage
Creek or River
Reservoir
I | Distribution
L 1 Pressure Tank
Earthen Reservoir
V Well
\ _ / Reaction Basin
I _ I Pressure Filler
Treated Water
Figure 22. Simplified schematic presentation of Denton Water Utility system.
-------
Colony is a private development of Fox and Jacobs, Inc. designed primarily
for residential homes and small commercial establishments. The organi-
zation started selling houses in the district in June 1974, and the water
district was established to serve the area. The Colony is located 26 miles
north of Dallas and a portion of its land fronts on the Garza-Little Elm
Reservoir. The water system served a population of approximately 1,550 in
a 0.44-square mile service area in 1975. The Colony MUD system has been in
existence for only one year. During that year the RPW amounted to 43 mil
gal. It is expected that the population will expand rapidly. Projections
call for more than doubling the population in 1976. In 1975, the average
cost of RPW was $4,821/mil gal. Of this amount, 20 percent was O&M expense
and the remainder was depreciation and interest. The high depreciation and
interest are attributed to construction of the entire system with present
day dollars and the fact that the system is built to support a considerably
larger population than is presently served.
The System
The Colony MUD #1 system acquires its raw water from two wells: 1)
Trinity Sands well is approximately 2,400 feet deep with a maximum capacity
of 750 gal/minute, and 2) Paluxy well is 1,350 feet deep with a maximum
capacity of 200 gal/minute. The distribution system contains a 400,000-gal
ground storage tank and a 500,000-gal elevated storage reservoir. The
distribution system consists of 6-inch and 18-inch pipelines and is
designed to support further expansion and provide adequate pressure
throughout the system. Figure 23 is a simplified schematic presentation of
the Colony MUD #1 water system. The processed data are in Appendix C.
Data shown are for the one year of operation. The fiscal year of the
organization made it necessary to obtain the operating expenses by
utilizing the last half of one fiscal year and the first half of the next
year in order to document a complete year of operation.
DALLAS COUNTY WCID #6
Location and Operation
The Dallas County Water Collection and Improvement District (WCID) #6
is owned by the citizens residing in the district, a political subdivision
of the State of Texas located primarily in the unincorporated areas of
Dallas County outside the City of Dallas. The system serves a population
of approximately 13,800 in a 7.0-square mile service area. During the
period 1966 through 1975, the RPW for the utility increased 112 percent
from 159 mil gal in 1966 to 337 mil gal in 1975. In 1975, the average cost
for RPW was $948/mil gal. Of this amount, 65 percent was O&M expense and
the remainder was depreciation and interest.
The System
Originally, Dallas County WCID #6 acquired its source water from wells,
48
-------
IFGtHO
Pumpins
I ] Trpalmpnl
tU Clear Wf II
' * Elevated Storage
Creek nr River
Bf;er»oir
-j [ Distribution
I ^ Prfssnrp T^nk
[arlhpn Rpsprvoir
V Well
\ _ / Reaction Ba^in
I - 1 Pressnip Filler
Morale
treated Water
V
(2 Wells)
Figure 23. Simplified schematic presentation of Colony Municipal Utility District //I system.
-------
Approximately three years ago, the phase-out of ground source operations
was completed and at the present time all water is purchased as treated
water from the Dallas Water Utility.
Water is passed from the Dallas utility to WCID #6 through a metered
connection and is stored in a 2.0-mil gal ground storage tank. The water
is then pumped from the ground storage tank into a 750,000-gal elevated
tank where it flows into the distribution system.
Figure 24 is a simplified schematic presentation of the Dallas County
WCID #6 water system. The processed data are in Appendix C.
The amount of treated water (purchased water) was available for the
latest year only.
COCKRELL HILL WATER UTILITY
Location and Operation
The Cockrell Hill Water Utility is owned and operated by the City of
Cockrell Hill, Texas, an island city located within the city limits of
Dallas. The water system serves a population of approximately 3,500 in a
1.0-square mile service area. During the period 1969 through 1975, the
RPW for the utility decreased 17 percent from 123 mil gal in 1969 to 102
mil gal in 1975. In 1975, the average cost for RPW was $791/mil gal. Of
this amount, 90 percent was O&M expense and the remainder was depreciation
and interest. The high O&M ratio is attributed to the fact that this sys-
tem is primarily a distribution system which purchases treated water under
pressure from another utility as discussed in the following subsection.
The System
The Cockrell Hill Water Utility's source is treated water from the
Dallas Water Utility. Treated water is received into the Cockrell Hill
system from four 6-inch connection mains. The water is received under
pressure and distributed directly to the consumer; therefore, the system
requires no pumping, treatment, or storage within its boundaries. The
City of Dallas maintains two elevated storage tanks near the city limits
to feed water into the Cockrell Hill distribution system.
Figure 25 is a simplified schematic presentation of the Cockrell Hill
water system. The processed data are in Appendix C.
The processed data include information for only the years 1969
through 1975. Adequate financial and operational records were not avail-
able for prior years.
50
-------
LEGEND
f J Pumpine
I J Treatment
tU Clear Well
L J Elevalrrl Sloraee
J "~^» Creek or River
^'3\ Reservoir
1 | Distribution
l_] Pressure Tank
^r Earthen Reservoir
V Well
\ J Reaction Basin
1 1 Pressure filler
^^s' Storage
Treated Water
C^
LJ
Figure 24. Simplified schematic presentation of Dallas County Water Collection
and Improvement District //6 water system.
-------
LEGEND
Pumpine
| | Treatment
t~~\ Clear Well
L_J Elevated Storage
=!^^
Cr«k or Ri»er
Reservoir
I [ Distribution
' i Pressure Tank
Earthen Reserioir
V Well
\ _ I Reaction Basin
I _ I Pressure Filler
Storage
Trealerl Water
Figure 25. Simplified schematic presentation of Cockrell Hill water Utility system.
-------
REFERENCES
1. Quarles, John R., "Impact of the Safe Drinking Water Act," Journal
of the American Water Works Association, Vol. 68, No. 2, February 1976,
pp. 69-70.
2. Clark, Robert M., Gillean, James I., and Adams, W. Kyle, "The Cost of
Water Supply and Water Utility Management: Volume 1, "Municipal
Environmental Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development,
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45268,
EPA-600/5-77-015a, November 1977.
53
-------
APPENDIX A
This Appendix contains small water utilities printouts for Region III
water systems. The first system printout is the complete 18-page format.
The printouts that follow are the cover and data pages only for each
system. If explanantion of a data element is required, refer to the
first printout.
U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WATE1 SUPPLY COST STUDY
EPA CONTRACT 68-03-2071
FOR
BOROUGH OF OOUNINGTDHN
3-3-003
W 6/76
EPA PROJECT OFFICER
ROBERT CLARK
HATER SUPPLY RESEARCH D1V.
MUNICIPAL ENVIRONMENTAL
RESEARCH LABORATORY
26 WEST ST.CLAIR STREET
CINCINNATI . OHIO <.5260
TELEPHONE: (M3> 68<>-7209
ACT SYSTEMS PROGRAM MANAGER
WILLIAM KYLE ADAMS
SUITE 200
807 WEST HORSE BLVD.
WINTER PARK, FLORIDA 32769
TELEPHONEI (305) 6<.
-------
3-3-002
W 6/7S>
BOROUGH OF ODnNINGTOWN
SYSTEM FACTS
THE SYSTEM FACTS REPORT IDENTIFIES THE PARAMETERS OF THE MATER UTILITY UNDER
STUDY. THE DEPORT INCLUDES THE POPULATION, SIZE OF THE SERVICE AREA, NUMBER
OF CUSTOMERS, SOURCE HATER INFORMATION, PERTINENT TOPOGRAPHICAL DATA. AND
FLO. INFORMATION FDR THE YEAR DESIGNATED IN THE HEADING. INFORMATION IN
THIS REPORT IS ON A FISCAL YEAR BASIS. FISCAL YEAR 197^-75 FOR EXAMPLE IS
DESIGNATED 1975 THROUGHOUT THE PRINTOUT. THE IMPLEMENTATION DATE IS THE
DATE THAT DATA WAS COLLECTED AT THE UTILITY.
ALL UMITS IN THIS REPORT ARE IN EV&LISH
THE FOLLOWING TABLE CONVERTS THE UNITS TO METRIC
Ul POUNDS PER MILLION GALLONS TO MILLIGRAMS PER LITER OR
<-" PARTS PER MILLION MULTIPLY BY 0.12
MILLION GALLONS TO THOUSAND CUBIC METERS MULTIPLY BY 3.79
i, MH, OR KWH/M1LLION GALLONS TO >, MH, OR
HUH/THOUSAND CUBIC METERS MULTIPLY BY o.26
FEET TO METERS MULTIPLY BY 0.3D
MILES TO KILOMETERS MULTIPLY BY 1.61
SQUARE MILES TO SBUARE KILOMETERS MULTIPLY BY 2.59
NOTE! BECAUSE OF COMPUTER DESIGN, ACTUAL VALUES AND PRINTED NUMBERS MAY
VARY SLIGHTLY
-- INDICATES THAI THE DATA WAS NOT AVAILABLE
PAGE 1
-------
3-3-002
</ 6/76
Ln
BOROUGH OF DOHNINGTOUN
SYSTEM FACTS
1976
POPULATION - SMSA
COUNTY
CITY OR TOIIN
RETAIL SERVICE AREA
AREA OF RETAIL SERVICE AREA
NUMBER OF METERS
NUMBER OF ACCOUNTS
NUMBER OF FLAT RATE ACCOUNTS
PURCHASED WATER - RAM
TREATED
SOURCE HATER - GROUND
SURFACE
PIPE IN SYSTEH
ELEVATIONS - INTAKES
TREATMENT PLANTS
SERVICE AREA MIN.
SERVICE AREA MAX.
REVENUE PRODUCING MATER
TREATED HATER
PAX. DAY
MAX. HOUR
FISCAL YEAR
IMPLEMENTATION DATE
PROCESSING DATE
NONE
315239
eiOD
8268.
3.00 SO Ml
1872.
1872.
0.
D MG
0.36 MG
0.0 *
100.0 «
20 MI
250 FT
345 FT
24<- FT
500 FT
315.5770 It
390.5600 MG
1 .40 MG
1.51 MG
12/31
<./ 6/76
5/27/76
PAGE
-------
3-3-002
-------
3-3-002
4/ 6/76
Ln
00
BOROUGH OF DDNN1N&TDWN
10-YEAR KEY 0 C M COST ANALYSIS
.
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACUUIS ITION
TREATMENT
DISTRlbUTION
TOTAL
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
OISTR] bUTIUN
TOTAL
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACOUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRI8UT IDN
TOTAL
1966 1967
9252. 17220.
8359. 7729.
16031. 19735.
17710. 20836.
51351. 65520.
23. 37.
21. 17.
40. 43.
44. 45 .
128. 142.
18.02 26.28
16.28 11.80
31.22 30.12
34.49 31.80
100.00 100.00
1968
19824.
9020.
23299.
17181 .
69324.
41 .
19.
49 .
36.
145.
26 .60
13.01
33.61
24.78
100.00
1969
COST/YEAR
21791 .
8865.
29155.
21303.
81113.
CDST/MG
44.
18.
58.
43.
163.
* OF TOTAL
26 .86
10.93
35.94
26.26
100.00
1970
27914.
8964.
34137.
26048.
97062.
55.
IB.
67.
51.
191 .
28 .76
9.24
35.17
26.84
100.00
1971
39557.
10177.
38146.
29142.
1 17021.
88.
23.
85.
65.
262 .
33. oD
8. 70
32.60
24.90
100.00
1972 1973
47254. 58876.
12677. 16805.
48256. 49909.
24395. 31154.
132581. 156745.
126. 177.
34. 51.
129. 150.
65. 94.
355. 472.
35.64 37.56
9.56 10.72
36.40 31.34
18.40 19.88
100.00 100.00
1974
35024.
19375.
54447.
43299.
202145.
254.
58.
163.
129.
604.
42.06
9.58
26.93
21.42
100.00
1975 «
5187b.
1398J.
52854.
52841.
171560.
164.
44.
167.
167.
541.
30.24
8.15
30.91
30. JO
100. DO
-------
3-3-OOZ
BOROUGH OF DONNINGTDNN
TREATMENT INFORMATION
THE WATER TREATMENT INFORMATION REPORT PROVIDES INFORMATION ON HATER TREAT-
MENT PROCESSES THAT THE UTILITY IS CURRENTLY USING, ALONG NITH ASSOCIATED
COST. THE TREATMENT INFORMATION IS DIVIDED INTO THREE PARTS. THE FIRST.
TREATMENT PROCESSES, LISTS THE TYPES OF TREATMENT THAT ARE USED BY THE UTIL-
ITY: THE SECOND, TREATMENT CHEMICALS, IDENTIFIES THE CHEMICALS USED PER
MILLION GALLONS OF TREATED HATER DURING THE LAST YEAR; THE THIRD, TEN-YEAR
CHEMICAL COST ANALYSIS, PROVIDES THE TOTAL COST OF CHEMICALS USED DURING
EACH YEAR FDR THE PAST TEN YEARS. THE AMOUNT OF HATER THAT HAS TREATED. THE
BILLED CONSUMPTION, THE CHEMICAL COST IN DOLLARS PER MILLION GALLONS TREATED
HATER. AND THE CHEMICAL COST IN DOLLARS PER MILLION GALLONS OF BILLED CON-
SUMPTION.
PAGE 5
-------
BOROUGH OF OOWNINGTONN
TREATMENT INFORMATION
10-YEAR CHEMICAL COST ANALYSIS
3-3-032
4/ 6/76
TREATMENT PROCESSES
SEDIMENTATION
COAGULATION
FILTRATION
CHLORINAT ION
ACTIVATED CARBON
t MATER TREATED *
100. »
100. X
100. X
100.*
2.»
« TREATMENT CHEMICALS
CHLORINE
CARBON
LIME
ALUM
COPPER SULFATE
LB/MG TREATED
35.8
i.a
<>6.6
157.5
0.0
TOTAL COST
TREATED WATER
BILLED M&
S/MG TREATED
i/MG BILLED
1966
3500.
444.
402.
8.
9.
1967
3800.
472.
461.
8.
8.
1968
4021.
497.
479.
8.
8.
1969
6162.
516.
498.
12.
12.
1970
4834.
520.
507.
9.
10.
1971
4458.
SOD.
447.
9.
10.
1972
4500.
485.
374.
9.
12.
1973
4052.
474.
332.
9.
12.
1974
6682.
445.
334.
15.
20.
U75«
7437.
391.
316.
19.
23.
PAGE
-------
3-3-002
*/ 6/76
BOROUGH OF OOHNINGTOHN
RAH/TREATED HATER OU»LITY INFORMATION
THE RAH/TREATED HATER OUALITY REPORT PRESENTS HATER 3USLITY INFORMATION PER-
TINENT TO THE SAFE DRINKING MATES ACT. THE STANDARDS ARE LISTED BELOH.
INTERIM PRIMARY MCL'S IMG/LI
PROPOSED StCDNOARY STANDARD (MG/L)
ARSENIC
BARIUM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
LEAD
MERCURY
NITRATE IN)
SELENIUM
SILVER
FLOURIDE
AVG. MAX. DAILY
TO 53.8
TO 58.3
TO 63.8
TO 70.6
TO 79.2
TO 90.5
ENDRIN
L INDANE
METHOXYCHLOR
TOXAPHENE
2.4-D
2.4,5-TP
TURBIDITY
0.05
1 .
0.010
0.05
0.05
0.002
10.
0 .01
0.05
AIR TEMP.
2.<>
2.2
2.0
1.6
1.6
1 .<.
0.0002
0.00<,
0.1
0.005
0.1
0.01
1 UNIT
COLOR
ODOR
CHLORIDE
COPPER
FOAMING AGENTS
IRON
MANGANESE
SULPHATE
ZINC
PROPOSED RADIATION
RADIUM 226
GROSS BETA
GROSS ALPHA
RADIUM 228
STRONTIUM 90
IODINE 131
TRITIUM
15 UNITS
3 T.O.N
250.
0.2
0.05
0.3
0.05
250.
5.
STANDARD
3 PCI/L
10DO PCI/L
15 PCI/L
5 PCI/L
3 PCI/L
2 PCI/L
8 X 10EOWL
DATA INCLUDED IN THE OUALITY REPORT IS IN ONE OF TH«EE FORMATS:
1. THE RESULTS OF A SINGLE TEST ON RAy AND/OR TREATED HATER WITH THE DATE.
2. THE RANGE OF RESULTS OF MORE THAN ONE TEST OVER THE PAST 12 MONTHS FOR
RAW AND/OR TREATED HATER. NO DATE IS GIVEN IN THIS CASE.
i. THE RANGE OF RESULTS OF MORE THAN ONE TEST AT M3RE THAN ONE MATER SOURCE
OR SITE IN THE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM. THE TEST DATE IS PRINTED OUT.
PAGE 7
-------
3-3-002
W t>/76
BOROUGH Of OOHNINGTOWN
RAW/TREATED HATER QUALITY INFORMATION
(UNITS ARE THE SAME AS SHOHN ON PAGE ABOVE)
CONSTITUENT RAH 0
-------
3-3-002
</ 6/7S
BOROUGH OF DOtrNINGTOUN
10-YEAR LABOR COST ANALYSIS
THE TEN-YEAR LABOR COST ANALYSIS INCLUDES THE FOLLOnIMG INFORMATION ON AN
ANNUAL BASIS FOR THE PAST TcN YEARS:
PAYROLL 1 - DIN LABOR COST
MAN HOURS - TOTAL MAN HOURS WORKED
MG BILLED CONSUMPTION - REVENJE PRODUCING WATER
l/MG - PAYROLL DIVIDED BY MG BILLED CONSUMPTION
MH/MG - MAN HOURS DIVIDED BY BILLED CONSUMPTION
»/MH - PAYROLL DIVIDED BY MAN HOURS
PAGE
-------
3-3-002
*/ 6/76
BOROUGH OF OOWNINGTQMN
10-YEAR LABOR COST ANALYSIS
1966
1967
1966
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
197<,
1975
PAYROLL I
HAH HOURS
MG BILLED CONSUMPTION
WHO
MH/HG
i/MH
11000.
27.
36261. 41035. 4<.870.
11000. 11000. 11000.
1.
5.43 6.89 7.98 6.97 7.52 7.12
-------
3-3-002
BOROUGH OF DOKNINGTOMN
10-YEAR POKER COST ANALYSIS
THE TEN YEAR POtrER COST ANALYSIS INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION ON AN
ANNUAL BASIS FDR THE PAST TEN YEARS:
POWER » - POKER COST
KKH - KILOWATT HOURS USED
S/MG - POKER COST DIVIDED BY MILLION GALLONS BILLED CONSUMPTION
KWH/MG - KILOKATT HOURS CIIVIDEO BY MILLION GALLDNS BILLED CONSUMPTION
Ln
PAGE 11
-------
3-3-002
4/ kilt,
BOROUGH OF DOWNINGTOMN
10-YEM< POKER COST ANALYSIS
196.6
1967
1969
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
197*
1975
POWER
K H H/MG
11056.
7433.
27.
18.
11526.
7155.
25.
16.
12349. 14128. 1353<.. 16534. 19505.
8256.
19.
17.
27.
15.
37.
17.
52.
18587.
817<. .
56.
25.
24907.
7724.
74.
23.
24143.
5403.
77.
ON
-------
3-3-002
</ e>/7s
BOROUGH OF OOxMNGTOWN
10-YEAR DEPRECIATION COST ALLOCATION
THE TEN YEAR DEPRECIATION COST ALLOCATION REPORT INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING
COST FOR The LAST TEN YEARS. TrIESE COST ARE ALLOCATED TO THE UTILITIES
FUNCTIONS OF SUPPORT SERVICES, AOU5ITION. TREATMENT AND DISTRIBUTION.
DEPRECIATION COST » - ANNUAL DEPRECIATION COST IN DOLLARS
DEPRECIATION COST 1/Mt - DEPRECIATION COST DIVIDED 3Y M6 BILLED CONSUMPTION
DEPRECIATION COST * OF TOTAL - DEPRECIATION COST OF A UTILITY FUNCTION AS A
PERCENT OF TOTAL DEPRECIATION COST
INTEREST COST - INCLUDES INTEREST t (TOTAL ANNUAL INTEREST COST IN DOLLARS)
AND INTEREST COST i/*t {INTEREST COST DIVIDED BY MILLION
GALLONS BILLED CONSUMPTION)
PAOE 13
-------
3-3-OD2
4/ 6/76
BOROUGH OF OOHNINGTDWN
10-YEAR DEPRECIATION ALLOCAT10S
»
1966 1967 1968
1969
1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 «
DEPRECIATION COST »
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACJUISIT ION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
1941. 2057. 2173.
971. 1028. 1086.
971. 102e). 1086.
15531. 16456. 17381.
19414. 20570. 21726.
2288.
1144.
1144.
18306.
22882.
DEPRECIATION COST
SUPPORT SERVICES
gj ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
5. 4. 5.
2. 2. 2.
i. 2. 2 .
39. 36. 36.
48. 45. 45.
5.
2.
2.
37.
46.
DEPRECIATION COST *
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
10.00 10.00 10.00
5.00 5.00 5.00
5.00 5.00 5.00
80.00 80.00 80.00
100.00 100.00 100.00
10.00
5.00
5.00
80.00
100.00
INTEREST COST
INTEREST $
INTEREST l/MG
13955. 10445. 9628.
35. 23. 20.
9128.
18.
2404. 2519. 2635. 2751. 2866. 2982.
1202. 1260. 1317. 1375. 1433. 1491.
1202. 1260. 1317. 1375. 1433. 1491.
19230. 20155. 21080. 22005. 22930. 2385*.
24038. 25194. 26350. 27506. 2B662. 29613.
l/MG
5. 6. 7. 8. 9. J.
2. 3. 4. 4. 4. 5.
2. 3. 4. 4. 4. 5.
38. 45. 56. 66. 69. 74.
47. 56. 71. 83. 86. 9 i .
OF TOTAL
10. OD 10.03 10.00 10.00 10.00 10. JO
5.00 5.00 5.00 5. DO 5.00 5. 3D
5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5. DO
80.00 80.00 80.00 80.00 80.00 80. DO
100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100. DO
1
8447. 7743. 7016. 6313. 5499. 470*.
17. 17. 19. 19. 16. 15.
PAGE 14
-------
3-3-002
</ 6/76
BDROU&H OF OONN1NGTOWN
10-YEAR CAPITAL AND OPERATING CDST 414LYS1S
THE TEN-YEAR CAPITAL AND OPERATING COST ANALYSIS PROVIDES THE FOLLOWING
ANNUAL COSTS FOR THE PAST TEN YEARS:
DIM - OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE COSTS
DEPRECIATION - ANNUAL DEPRECIATION COST (ORIGIONAL COST - STRAIGHT LINE
METHOD)
INTEREST - ANNUAL INTEREST COST ON BOTH SHORT- »ND LONG-TERN DEBT
TOTAL - SUM OF THE ABOVE COSTS
»/MG - TOTAL DIVIDED BY MG BILLED CONSUMPTION
»/MG 1975 DOLLARS - i/MG ADJUSTED TO 1975 VALUES USING T"IE C3NSUHER
PRICE INDEX
SPECIAL TAXES - REAL PROPERTY TAXES (NOT INCLUDED IN TOTAL)
OlM * OF TOTAL - OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE COST AS A PERCENT OF TOTAL
PAKE IS
-------
3-3-002
4/ 6/76
BOROUGH Of DOHNINCTOHN
10-YEAR CAPITAL AND OPERATING COST ANALYSIS
TOTAL
l/MG
t/NG 1975 DOLLARS
SPECIAL TAXES
0 t M t OF TuTAL
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
0 C M 51351. 65520. 69324. 81113. 97062. 117021. 132581. 156745. 202145. 171560.
DEPRECIATIUN 19414. 20570. 21726. 22862. 24038. 25194. 26350. 27506. 28662. 29818.
INTEREST 13955. 10445. 9628. 9128. 8447. 7743. 7018. 6318. 5499. 4704.
84720. 96534. 100678. 113124. 129547. 149958. 165949. 190569. 236306. 206082.
211. 210. 210. 227. 256. 335. 444. 574. 707. 653.
350. 337. 326. 334. 355. 446. 573. 694. 770. 653.
0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 3.
60.61 67.87 6S.86 71.70 74.92 78.04 79.89 82.25 85.54 83.25
PAGE 16
-------
3-3-002
BOROUGH OF DOWNINGTOWN
CURRENT YEAR COST SUMMARY
THE COST SUMMARY PROVIDES THE SUPPORT SERVICES. AQUSITIQN, TREATMENT. DIS-
TRIBUTION, INTEREST, TOTAL. TAXES AND TOTAL WITH TAKES Of HATER ON A DOLLARS
PER MILLION GALLONS BASIS. THE SUMMARY ALSO PROVIDES THESE COSTS ON A PER-
CENT Of SUB-TOTAL AND PERCENT Of TOTAL BASIS.
THE TAXES IDENTIFIED BELOW INCLUDE ONLY REAL PROPERTY TAXES WHICH ARE USUAL-
LY FOUND IN PRIVATE UTILITIES. IF THESE TAXES 00 NOT EXIST THE SUB-TOTAL
AND TOTAL ARE EQUAL.
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION
THE TOWN PUMPS WATER FROM BEAVER CREEK AND HAS A SECOND GRAVITY INTAKE AT
COPELANO. WATER IS TREATED AT A PLANT CONSTRUCTED IN 1926. WATER THEN
FLOWS TO A 3.75 HO EARTHEN FINISHED WATER RESERVOIR. WATER IS THEN BOOSTED
INTO THE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM. THERE ARE TWO 2.9 MG TANKS IN THE SYSTEM.
PAGE 17
-------
3-3-002
BOROUGH OF DOMN1NGTOHN
COST SUHHARY FOR 1975
'SUPPORT SERVICES* ACQUISITION « TREATMENT DISTRIBUTION INTEREST TOTAL TAXES TOTAL H/TAX
»/MC 174. *9. 172. 2<.3. 15. 653. 0. 653.
X OF TOTAL 26.62 7.51 26.37 37.22 2.28 100.00
* OF TOTAL 26.62 7.51 26.37 37.22 2.28 100.00 0.00 100.00
W/TAX
NJ
IN SUMMARY:
DURING THE PAST 10 YEARS, » 1906232. TOTAL COST IN 1975 DOLLARS PRODUCED
<>1SO. HG WATER FOR AN AVERAGE COST OF t 459./ H& (1975 DOLLARS!
PAGE 18
-------
U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
HATER SUPPLY COST STUDY
EPA CONTRACT 68-03-2071
FDR
GREAT VALLEY HATER COMPANY
3-3-001
4/ 5/76
EPA PROJECT OFFICER
ROBERT CLARK
WATER SUPPLY RESE»RCH DIV.
MUNICIPAL ENVIRONMENTAL
RESEARCH LABORATORY
26 WEST ST.CLAIk STREET
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45260
TELEPHONE: (5131 684-7209
ACT SYSTEMS PROGRAM MANAGER
WILLIAM KYLE ADAMS
SUITE 200
807 HEST MORSE BLVD.
WINTER PARK. FLORIDA 32789
TELEPHONE: oosi 6*4-3900
UTILITY REPRESENTATIVE
MR. THOMAS G. KEYS. PRESIDENT
GREAT VALLEY WATER CO.
453 LANCASTER PIKE
MALVERN, PENNSYLVANIA 19355
215-644-3595
REGIONAL REPRESENTATIVE
MR. JIM MANHARING
WATER SUPPLY BRANCH
JS EPA
6TH t WALNUT STREETS
PHILADELPHIA. PA 19106
215-597-7736
-------
3-3-001
<./ 5/76
GREAT VALLEY MATER COMPANY
5Y5TEH FACTS
1975
POPULATION - SMS4
COUNTY
CITY OS TOHN
RETAIL SERVICE AREA
AREA OF RETAIL SERVICE AREA
NUMBER QF METERS
NUMBER UF ACCOUNTS
NUMBER OF FLAT RATE ACCOUNTS
PURCHASED UATER - RAW
TREATED
SOURCE HATER - GROUND
SURFACE
PIPE IN SYSTEM
ELEVATIONS - INTAKES
TREATMENT PLANTS
SERVICE AREA MIN.
SERVICE AREA MAX.
REVENUE PRODUCING WATER
TREATED MATER
MAX. DAY
MAX. HOUR
FISCAL YEAR
IMPLEMENTATION DATE
PROCESSING DATE
28COOO
16500.
43.00 SO Ml
3315.
3315.
0.
0 MG
0 MG
100.0 *
D.O >.
85 MI
200 FT
610 FT
363.2700 M&
435.4110 MG
12/31
4/ 5/76
5/27/76
PAGE
-------
3-3-001
<./ 5/76
GREAT VALLEY MATER COMPANY
10-YEAR KEY 0 t M COST ANALYSIS
1966
1967
1963 1969 1970
COST/YEAR
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
1
01 SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
31540.
1025'..
4863.
3274.
49931.
544.
177.
84.
56.
862.
63.17
20.54
9.74
6.56
100.00
43499.
8135.
4716.
5453.
61803.
soa.
95.
55.
64.
722.
70.38
13.16
7.63
8.82
100.00
35215.
16477.
8256.
2921.
62869.
254.
119.
59.
21.
453.
56.01
26.21
13.13
4.65
100.00
37675.
26794.
9267.
7513.
81250.
COST/M&
233.
165.
57.
46.
502.
X OF TOTAL
46.37
32.98
11.41
9.25
100.00
39303.
29833.
9924.
8307.
87367.
231.
176.
58.
49.
514.
44.99
34.15
11.36
9.51
100.00
50511.
38723.
14648.
10131.
114013.
217.
166.
63.
43.
489.
44.30
33.96
12.85
8.89
100.00
53566.
35733.
18618.
13870.
121787.
199.
133.
69.
52.
453.
43.98
29.34
15.29
11.39
100.00
61444.
41839.
21801.
25454.
150538.
199.
135.
70.
82.
487.
40.82
27.79
14.48
16.91
100.00
70546.
61123.
32853.
32902.
197424.
186.
161.
87.
87.
521.
35.73
30.96
16.64
16.67
100.00
78767.
71926.
39665.
33536.
22391'...
206.
138.
133.
87.
584.
35.19
32.12
17.71
14. }8
100. DO
PACE
-------
CREST VALLEY HATER COMPANY
TRPATMENT INFORMATION
3-3-001
4/ 5/7!>
TRtATMtNT PROCESSES
CHLOxINATlON
STABILIZATION
* kATER TRtATEu TRtATMENT CHEMICALS LB/HO TREATED »
100. t
100. t
10-YEAR CHEHICAL COST ANALYSIS
0
TOTAL COST
TREATED NATER
BILLED MC
$/MG TREATED
S/MG BILLED
1966 1967 196B
4085.
65. 112. 163.
58. 86. 139.
25.
29.
1969
4729.
193.
162.
24.
29.
1970
6014.
243.
170.
25.
35.
1971
8539.
276.
233.
31 .
37.
1972
10065.
306.
269.
33.
37.
1973
12972.
358.
309.
36.
42.
1974
22322.
399.
379.
57.
60.
1975.
29590.
435.
383.
S3 .
77.
-------
3-3-001
<»/ 5/76
GREAT VALLEY KATER CQHPANY
RAH/TREATED HATER QUALITY INFORMATION
(UNITS ARE THE SAME AS SHOKN ON PAGE ABOVE)
CONSTITUENT
0
NITRATE IN)
TURBIDITY
COLOR
CHLORIDE
IRON
MANGANESE
» RAW
HIM.
.02
0.12
1.0
12.0
.01
<0.01
10/20/7* ° TREATED 10/20/74 «
MAX. TEST MIN. MAX. TEST *
5.0
3.8
1.0
29.0
2.0
0.2
PAGE
-------
3-3-001
4/ 5/76
GREAT VALLEY WATER CDHP4NY
10-YEAR LABOR COST ANALYSIS
1968
1969
1970
1971
197,!
1973
1974
1975
00
PAYROLL i
MAN HOURS
MG BILLED CONSUMPTION
»/HC
37661. 43609. 4596'.. 55750. 62969. 86927. 92631. 108002.
8320. 10400. 10400. 10400. 14560. 14560. 16640. 1664D.
139. 162. 170. 233. 269. 309. 379. 383.
271. 269. 271. 239. 234. 281. 245. 282.
60. 64. 61. 45. 54. 47. 44. <3.
H.53 <,.19 1..42 5.36 4.33 5.97 5.57 6.'4?
PAGE 10
-------
POWER »
K M H
i/HC
K M H/MG
3-3-001
*/ 5/76
GREAT VALLEY HATER COMPANY
10-YEAR PC.NER COST ANALYSIS
1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 197<. 1975
5569. 6b9. 1.51,52.
75.
68.
71.
79.
85.
87.
107. 119.
-------
00
o
3-3-001
4/ 5/76
GREAT VALLEY yATER COMPANY
10-YEA3 DEPRECIATION ALLOCATION
1966 1967 1968
1969
1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 . «
OEPxECI ATION COST 1
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
1268. 1528. 2147.
2536. 3056. 429<..
634. 764. 1073.
8241. 9932. 13954.
12679. 15281. 21"t68.
2459.
4918.
1229.
15982.
24568.
DEPRECIATION COST
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACUUI S1TION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
22. 18 . 15.
44. 36 . 31 .
11. 9. 8.
142. 116. 100.
219. 179. 155.
15.
30.
8.
99.
152.
DEPRECIATION COST »
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
10.00 10.00 10.00
20.00 20.00 20.00
5.00 5. CO 5.00
65.00 65.00 65.00
100.00 100.00 100.00
10.00
20.00
5.00
65.00
100.00
INTEREST COST
INTEREST 1
INTEREST $/Mt
0. 2776. 3698.
0. 32. 27.
8186.
51.
3026. 3636. 4106. 4753. 5046. 6715.
6051. 7272. 8212. 9507. 10093. 13431.
1513'. 1618. 2053. 2377. 2523. 3353.
19667. 23633. 26689. 30897. 32802. 43650.
30257. 3635J. 41060. «753i. 50n64. 6715*.
»/MG
18. 16. 15. 15. 13. 18.
36. 31 . 31. 31 . 27. 35.
9. 8. 8. 8 . 7. ?.
116. 101. 99. 100. 87. 114.
178. 156. 153. 154. 133. 175.
OF TOTAL
10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.30
20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.39
5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.30
65.00 65.00 65.09 65.00 65.00 65.00
100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
$
6196. 21150. 29068. 29359. 33882. 30905.
36. 91. 108. 92. 89. 81.
-------
1-3-001
4/ 5/76
GREAT VALLEY HATER COMPANY
10-YEAR CAPITAL AND OPERATING COST ANALYSIS
1966 1967
1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973
1974 1975
0 I K
DEPRECIAT ICN
INTEREST
TOTAL
»/HG 1975 DOLLARS
SPECIAL TAXES
0 t M t OF TJTAL
49931. 61803. 62869. 81250. 87367. 114013. 121787. 150538. 197424. 223914.
12679. 15281. 21468. 24588. 30257. 36358. 41060. 47534. 50464. 67154.
0. 2776. 3698. 8186. 6196. 21150. 29068. 28359. 33882. J0905.
62610. 79859. 88036. 114023. 123820. 171522. 191915. 226431. 281771. 321973.
1080. 933. 634. 704. 729. 736. 714. 732. 744. 84D.
1794. 1502. 983. 1035. 1013. 979. 921. 886. 811. 843.
0. 0. 0. 0. 3613. 6242. 9447. 9479. 9668. 10149.
79.75 77.39 71.41 71.26 70.56 66.47 63.46 66.48 70.07 69.54
PAGE 16
-------
3-3-001
<./ 5/76
GRE4T VALLEY WATER COMPANY
COST SUMMARY FOR 1975
"SUPPORT SERVICES* ACQUISITION ' TREATMENT DISTRIBUTION « INTEREST « TOTAL TAXES TOTAL W/TAX *
S/MG 223. 223. 112. 201. 81. 840. 2(>. Bf>7.
* OF TOTAL 26.56 26.51 13.36 23.97 9.60 100.00
* OF TUTAL 25.74 i5.70 12.95 23.24 9.31 96.94 3.06 100.00
H/TAX
00
IN SUMMARY:
DURING THE PAST 10 YEARS. 1 2087463. TOTAL COST IN 1975 DOLLARS PRODUCED
2187. MG WATER FOR AN AVERAGE COST OF » 954./ MG (1975 DDLLARSI
-------
u. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
HATER SUPPLY COST STUDY
EPA CONTRACT 6B-03-207J
FDR
HONEY BROOK BOROUGH
3-3-003
*/ 7/76
CO
EPA PROJECT OFFICER
ROBERT CLARK
MATER SUPPLY RESEARCH D1V.
MUNICIPAL ENVIRONMENTAL
RESEARCH LABORATORY
2t> NEST 5T.CLAIR STREET
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45260
TELEPHONE: ism 68<.-7209
ACT SYSTEMS PROGRAM MANAGER
WILLIAM KYLE ADAHS
SUITE 200
807 WEST NORSE BLVD.
UINTER PARK. FLORIDA 32789
TELEPHONE: i3os> 6<.
-------
3-3-003
-------
HONEY BRObK BURUUGH
10-YEAK KFY 0 L f CtiST ANALYSIS
3-3-003
*/ 7/7(>
1966
1967
00
Ln
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACUU1S1TION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
196tf 1969 1970
COST/YEAR
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
769.
1699.
1040.
3149.
6857.
COST/M&
29.
73.
40.
121.
263.
» Of TOTAL
11.21
27.69
15.17
(.5.93
100.00
758.
2063.
1148.
2403.
6372.
27.
72.
40.
84.
223.
11.90
32.37
18.01
37.72
100.00
1163.
2505.
963.
2327.
695B.
35.
75.
29.
70.
209.
16.72
36.00
13.64
33.4<>
100.00
1237.
2788.
945.
2366.
7336.
32.
73.
25.
62.
192.
16.87
36.00
12.68
32.25
100.00
1197.
3275.
1217.
1497.
7185.
26.
77.
29.
35.
170.
16.65
45.58
16.93
20.93
100.00
1246.
3764.
1199.
3881.
10090.
28.
86.
27.
88.
229.
12.35
37.30
1 1.89
38.47
100.00
1403.
4001.
1365.
98S.
7756.
34.
97.
33.
24.
189.
18.09
51.59
17. i3
12.72
100.90
PACE 4
-------
CO
HUNE Y BknuK BCR CUI.H
TREATMENT INfUP«»T I UN
TREATMENT PROCESSES
CHLORlNATION
WATER TREATED
100.*
' TREATMENT CHENi:»LS
CHLORINE
LB/1G TREATED
1.*
10-YEAR CHEMICAL COST ANALYSIS
3-3-003
<./ 7/76
TOTAL COST
TREATED WATER
BILLEO MG
i/MG TREATED
i/MG BILLEO
1966 1967 1968 1969
91.
31.
26.
3.
4.
1970
229.
3*.
29.
7.
8.
1971
303.
39.
33.
a.
9.
1972
320.
75*
6.5.
'*9.
-.1 .
13.
16.
-------
3-3-003
<»/ 7/7f>
HONEY BROOK BOROUGH
RAN/TREATED HATER QUALITY INFORMATION
(UNITS ARE THE SOME AS SHOkN ON PAGE ABOVE)
CONSTITUENT * RAW 03/08/74 < TREATED 03/08/74
KIN. "14X. TEST « NIN. HAX. TEST
NITRATE (N) i,.65
IRON <0.05
oo
PAGE B
-------
3-3-003
*/ 7/7i
HONEY BROOK BOROUGH
10-YEAR LABOR COST ANALYSIS
1970
1971
1972
1973
197*.
00
00
PAYROLL 1
HAN HOURS
MG BILLEU CONSUMPTION
S/MG
MH/M&
»/MH
1606.
2b.
62.
16.
3.66
15.
1692.
(.It..
33.
51.
12.
"..07
1718.
10.
"..13
1945.
1975
1922.
ID.
PAGE 10
-------
3-3-003
*/ 7/76
HONEY BROCK BOROUGH
10-YE4R POKER COST 4NM.YSIS
1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 197<. 1975
POWER 1
1639. 1965. 2435. 2739. 3219. 3661. 3951.
K b ri/MO
00
69.
73.
72.
PAGE 12
-------
*
SUPPURT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
01 STRIBUTION
TOTAL
SUPPORT SERVICES
>£> ACJUISIT10N
O
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
INTEREST I
INTEREST WHO
3-3-003
*/ 7/76
MONEY BROOK BCROUGH
10-YEAR DEPRECIATION ALLOCATION
1966 1967 196b 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 197". 1975
DEPRECIATION COST t
0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. ).
930. 886. 872. 844. 813. 677. 775.
230. 221. 218. 211. 203. 169. 1»«.
3".50. 3322. 3271. 3164. 3051. 2538. 2907.
".600. 4430. 4361. 4218. 4067. 3384. 3B7S.
DEPRECIATION COST J/MC
0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
35. 31. 26. 22. 19. 15. U.
9. 8. 7. 6. 5. 4. 5.
132. 116. 93. 83. 72. 58. 73.
176. 155. 131. 110. 96. 77. 9V.
DEPRECIATION COST * OF TOTAL
0.00 0.00 O.DD 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.33
20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20. DO
5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
75.00 75.00 75.00 75.00 75.00 75.00 75.30
100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.30
INTEREST COST »
6514. 6275. 6026. 5768. 5499. 5219. 4927.
250. 219. 180. 151. 130. 119. 119.
PACE 14
-------
3-3-003
4/ 7/76
HUNEY BROOK BOROUGH
10-YEAR CAPITAL AND OPERATING COST ANALYSIS
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
0 I M
DEPRECIATION
INTEREST
TOTAL
l/HG
WHO 1975 DOLLARS
SPECIAL TAXES
C I M X OF TOTAL
6857. 6372. 6958. 7336.
4600. 4430. 4361. 4218.
7185. 10090.
4067. 3384.
6514. 6275.
6026.
3876.
5768. 5499. 5219. 4927.
17971.
689.
1013.
0.
38.16
17077.
597.
830.
0.
37.31
17346.
519.
691.
0.
40.11
17322.
.453.
584.
0.
42.35
16751.
396.
475.
0.
42.89
18693.
425.
463.
0.
53.98
16559.
431.
401.
D.
46.34
PAGE 16
-------
3-3-003
4/ 7/76
HONEY BROCK BGROUoH
COST SUHNARY FOR 1975
» 'SUPPORT SERVICES' ACOUIS1TION » TREATMENT » DISTRIBUTION INTEREST TOTAL UXES TOTAL H/TAX
WHO 34. 116. 38. 94. 119. 401. 0. 431.
X Of TOTAL 8.1.7 28.84 9.42 23.51 29.76 100.00
X OF TOTAL 8.47 i8.84 9.42 23.51 29.76 100.00 0.00 100.00
U/TAX
to
IN SUMMARY:
DURING THE PAST 7 YEARS, » 152772. TOTAL COST IN 1975 DOLLARS PRODUCED
254. hG MATER FOR AN AVERAGE COST OF t 602./ KG (1975 DOLLARS)
-------
U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WATER SUPPLY COST STUDY
EPA CONTRACT 68-03-2071
FOR
AUDJBON HATER COMPANY
3-3-004
«./ 8/76
CO
EPA PROJECT OFFICER
ROBERT CLARK
MATER SUPPLY RESEARCH 01V.
MUNICIPAL ENVIRONMENTAL
RESEARCH LABORATORY
26 WEST ST.CLAU STREET
CINCINNATI. OHIO 1.5260
TELEPHONE: 1513) 684-7239
ACT SYSTEMS PROGRAM MANAGER
U1LLUH KYLE ADAMS
SUITE 200
807 MEST NORSE 3LVD.
WINTER PARK. FLORIDA 32739
TELEPHONE: oosi 6<.<.-390o
UTILITY REPRESENTATIVE
MR WILLIAM J CHEATLEY
AUOUBON WATER CO
420 W GERMANTOWN PIKE
NORRISTOWN PA 19401
215-275-6730
REGIONAL REPRESENTATIVE
MR JIM MANWARING
WATER SUPPLY 9RANCH JS EPA
REGION III
6^ C WALNUT STREETS
PHILADELPHIA, PA 19106
(215)597-7736
-------
3-3-00".
</ 8/7b
AUDUB3N HATER CDNP4NY
SYSTEM FACTS
1976
POPULATION - 5MSA
COUNTY
CITY OR TOWN
RETAIL SERVICE AREA
AREA OF RETAIL SERVICE AREA
NUMBER OF HETERS
NUM&ER OF ACCOUNTS
NUMBER OF FLAT RATE ACCOUNTS
PURCHASED HATER - RIiU
TREATED
SOURCE HATER - GROUND
SURFACE
PIPE IN SYSTEM
ELEVATIONS - INTAKES
TREATMENT PLANTS
SERVICE AREA MIN.
SERVICE AREA MAX.
REVENUE PRODUCING HATER
TREATED HATER
MAX. DAY
MAX. HOUR
FISCAL YEAR
IMPLEMENTATION DATE
PROCESSING DATE
6703.
0.00 SO HI
1191 .
1191 .
0.
0 MG
0 H&
100.0 *
0.0 *
20.0 HI
75 FT
325 FT
142.0870 MG
16fc.9t.50 MG
.693 MG
12/31
</ 8/76
5/27/76
PAGE
-------
AUDUBON HATER COMPANY
10-YEAR KEY 0 t M COST ANALYSIS
3-3-00*
4/ 8/76
1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971
COST/YEAR
1972
1973
1974
1975
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
10440. 16394. 21063. 24805. 39247. 36949.
COST/MG
413.
470.
440. 370. 455.
* OF TOTAL
382.
30058.
12725.
3237.
3576.
49596.
281.
119.
30.
33.
463.
60.61
25.66
6.53
7.21
100.00
38529.
14656.
4074.
6080.
63339.
269.
102.
28.
42.
442.
60.93
23.14
6.43
9.60
100.00
52149.
20902.
1982.
6157.
91190.
366.
147.
14.
43.
570.
64.23
25.74
2.44
7.58
100.00
52473.
23397.
1801.
5965.
93639.
369.
145.
13.
42.
589.
62.74
27.97
2.15
7.13.
100.30
PAGE
-------
3-3-004
</ 6/74
AUDUBON MATER COMPANY
TREATMENT INFORMATION
TREATMENT PRuCESSES
CHLORINATION
HATER TREATED
100. *
TREATMENT CHEMICALS
IB/NO TREATED
10-YEAR CHEMICAL COST ANALYSIS
1967 1968 1969 1970
1966
1971
1973
197!,
1>75«
TOTAL COST
TREATED hATER
BILLED Mb
»/MG TREATED
l/MG BILLED
25.
35.
35.
67.
67.
86.
86.
1 !<
107.
158.
105.
162.
1.
1.
147.
-------
3-3-00*
</ 9/76
AUOJBON WATER COMPANY
RAW/TREATED HATER QUALITY INFORMATION
(UNITS ARE THE SAKE IS SHOWN ON PAGE ABOVE)
CONSTITUENT « RAH 03/26/76 « TREATED 03/26/76
MIN. HAX. TEST « MIN. HAX. TEST
NITRATE IN) .05 2.S
CHLORIDE 1<>.0 18.0
IRON <0.05
-------
3-3-00<.
<./ 6/76
AUOU80N HATER COHP'NY
10-YEAR LABOR COST ANALYSIS
1967
1971
1973
197".
1975
PAYROLL »
HAN HOURS
MG BILLED CDNSOMPTIDN
V/HO
MH/HC
V/MH
107.
9279. 8953. 12195.
4992.
65.
35.
1 .66
CD
-------
3-3-00*
*/ 8/76
AUOUBON HATER COMPANY
10-YEAR POWER COST ANALYSIS
»»»*»*»«»«»»**»«**»**»»»»>*»»»»*»»*«»*»»*»*»«**»»»»*»>»>**»**»*****»***»*»************»
« 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 197* 19TS
POKER i 2935. 2926. 3267. 3S56. 5222. 6908. 9220. 9922. 13482. 15073.
K k H .... -_ -- 39*5. 3559.
1/ht 116. 8*. 68. 53. 61. 71. 86. 69. 98. 10b.
K N H/MG -- -- -- -- 28. 25.
PACE 12
-------
3-3-00
-------
3-3-00*
*/ 8/76
TOTAL
S/HG
J/MO 1975 DOLLARS
SPECIAL TAXES
0 I M X OF TOTAL
AUOUBON MATER COMPANY
10-YEAR CAPITAL AND OPERATING COST ANALYSIS
1966
0 I H 104*0.
DEPRECIATION 3108.
INTEREST 1*51.
1967
1639*.
3957.
129*.
1968 1969
21063. 2*805.
5*18. 7020.
1612. 2617.
1970
392*7.
8206.
19*5.
1971
369*9.
2562.
2016.
1972
*9596.
1390S.
1711.
1973
63339.
16372.
19211.
197*
81190.
18867.
32873.
1975
83639.
20169.
32200.
1*999. 216*5. 28093.
5»*. 620. 587.
986. 998. 910.
0. 0. 0.
69.60 75.7* 7*.98
3***2. *939B. *1S26. 65212.
51*. 573. *29. 609.
755. 796. 571. 786.
0. 0. 0. 455.
72.02 79.*5 84.98 76.05
98922. 132931. 136037.
691. 933. 957.
836. 1017. 957.
237. 159. 267.
6*.03 61.08 61.50
PAGE 16
-------
3-3-00*
*/ 8/76
AUDUBON KSTER COMPANY
COST SUMMARY FOR 1975
SUPPORT SERVICES' ACQUISITION » TREATMENT DISTRIBUTION « INTEREST TOTAL « TAXES TOTAL H/TAX
373.
OF TOTAL
* OF TOTAL
N/TAX
218.
12.11
22.73
12"..
12.92
12.89
0.20
100.00
o
NJ
IN SUMMARY:
DURING THE PAST 10 YEARS, » 76253*. TOTAL COST IN 1975 DOLLARS PRODUCED
893. HG WATER FOR AN AVERAGE COST OF I 95<>./ H& 11975 DOLLARS)
PAGE 18
-------
U. 3. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WATER SUPPLY COST STUDY
EPA CONTRACT 68-03-2071
F3R
CITY OF NANASSAS
3-*-001
3/29/76
O
OJ
EPA PROJECT OFFICER
ROBERT CLARK
WATER SUPPLY RESEARCH OIV.
MUNICIPAL ENVIRONMENTAL
RESEARCH LABORATORY
26 WEST ST.CLAIR STREET
CINCINNATI. OHIO
-------
3-4-001
3/39/71.
CITY OF MANASSAS
SYSTEM FACTS
1975
POPULATION - SMSA
COUNTY
CITY OR TOWN
RETAIL SERVICE AREA
AREA OF RETAIL SERVICE AREA
NUMBER OF METERS
NUMBER OF ACCOUNTS
NUMBER OF FLAT RATE ACCOUNTS
PURCHASED HATER - RAM
TREATED
SOURCE HATER - GROUND
SURFACE
PIPE IN SYSTEM
ELEVATIONS - INTAKES
TREATMENT PLANTS
SERVICE AREA M1N.
SERVICE AREA MAX.
REVENUE PRODUCING WATER
TREATED HATER
MAX. DAY
MAX. HOUR
FISCAL YEAR
IMPLEMENTATION DATE
PROCESSING DATE
300
-------
3-4-001
3/29/76
CITY OF MANASSAS
10-YEAR KEY OEM COST ANALYSIS
1966
1967 1968 1969 1970 1971
COST/YEAR
1972
1973
1974
1975
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
COST/MG
9070. 6369.
6966. 1949.
91620. 99943.
72687. 71757.
180341,. 18001"..
25059. 2722V.
1675. 2131.
105111. 132032.
B1029. B8506.
212874. 24994:..
24.
18.
243.
193.
47B.
17.
5.
263.
189.
475.
57.
4.
238.
184.
482.
63
>
290
19*.
549
OF TOTAL
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
5.03
3.86
50.60
40.30
100.00
3.54
1.08
55.52
39.86
100.00
11.77
0.79
49.38
38.36
100.00
10.99
0.37
52.32
35.il
100.30
PAGE
-------
o
ON
TREATMENT PROCESSES
AERATION
SEOIMENTAI ION
COAGULATION
FILTRATION
CHLORINATION
ACTIVATED CARBON
FLUORIOATION
COAGULATION
TOTAL COST
TREATED WATER
BILLED MG
»/MG TREATED
l/MG BILLED
3-*-001
3/29/76
CITY OF MANASSAS
TREATMENT INFORMATION
« * HATER TREATED » TREATMENT CHEMICALS LB/MG TREATED
100.*. CHLORINE 66.9
100. t FLUORIDE 33.4
100. 1 CARBON 21.1
100. * LIME 25.7
100.1 COPPER SULFATE 6.1
100. < SODA ASH 320.3
100. X AL SULFATE 323.2
100. * PHOSPHATE 16.9
10-YEAR CHEMICAL COST ANALYSIS
1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 197". 1J75»
36785. *«.5S3.
*08. 527. 539. 5S7.
378. 379. (.<!. 455.
72. 33.
88. 98.
-------
3-*-001
3/Z9/TS
CITY OF MANASSAS
RAW/TREATED HATER QUALITY INFORMATION
(UNITS ARE THE SANE AS SHOWN ON PAGE ABOVE)
* CONSTITUENT
ARSENIC
BARIUM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
LEAD
MERCURY
NITRATE (N)
SELENIUM
SILVER
FLUORIDE
ENORIN
LINDANE
METHOXYCHLOR
TDXAPHENE
2.4-D
2.
-------
3-d-OOl
3/29/76
CITY OF NANASSAS
10-YEAR LABOR COST ANALYSIS
1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971
19755.
203. 232.
82. 71. 69.
2.87 3.39
PAGE ID
-------
3-4-001
3/29/76
CITY Of NANASSAS
10-YEAR POKER COST ANALYSIS
1966 1967 1966 1969
1970
1971 1972
1973 1974 1975 »
POWER J
K M H
1/MG
K M H/MG
28315. <>3<>33.
6
-------
3-4-001
3/29/74
CITY OF MANASSAS
10-YEAR DEPRECIATION ALLOCATION
1967
1968 1969 1970
DEPRECIATION COST »
1971
1973
1974
1975
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACOUISIT10N
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
DEPRECIATION COST 1/MG
19148. 19260. 19483. 19901.
57444. 57781. 58448. 59402.
82336. S2B20. 83775. 85142.
32551. 32743. 33121. 336il.
191479. 19260i. 19.3S
DEPRECIATION COST \ Of TOTAL
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
INTEREST »
INTEREST S/M&
INTEREST COST 1
10.00 10.00
30.00 30.00
43.00 43.00
17.00 17.00
100.00 100.DD
224002.
593.
215767.
569.
10.00
30.00
43.00
17.00
100.00
222904.
SOS.
10.30
30.DD
43.DO
17.30
100.DO
200169.
439.
PACE 14
-------
3-4-001
3/29/76
CITY OF HANASSAS
10-YEAR CAPITAL AND OPERATING COST ANALYSIS
1966
1967 1968
1969
1970 1971 1972 1973 197* 1975
0 I H
DEPRECIATION
INTEREST
TOTAL
l/MG
S/MG 1975 DOLLARS
SPECIAL TAXES
D I M A OF TOTAL
180344. 18001
-------
3-4-001
3/29/76
CITY OF MANASSAS
COST SUMMARY FOR 1975
SUPPORT SERVICES* ACOUISITION » TREATMENT * DISTRIBUTION INTEREST TOTAL TAXES TOTAL H/TAX *
l/MG 103. 135. 477. 268. 439. 1423. 0. 1423.
X OF TOTAL 7.2«> 9.50 33.51 18.85 30.88 100.00
OF TOTAL 7.2i 9.50 33.51 18.85 30.88 100.00 0.00 100.00
N/TAX
IN SUMMARY!
DURING THE PAST < YEARS. I 2816035. TOTAL COST IN 1975 DOLLARS PRODUCED
4. MG HATER FOR AN AVERAGE COST OF V 1703./ It 11975 DOLLARS)
-------
U. S. ENVIRONMENTS!. PROTECTION AGENCY
HATER SUPPLY COST STUDY
EPA CONTRACT 68-03-2071
FOR
CITY OF MANA5SAS PARK
3-4-002
3/30/76
EPA PROJECT OFFICER
ROBERT CLARK
HATER SUPPLY RESEARCH DIV.
MUNICIPAL ENVIRONMENTAL
RESEARCH LABORATORY
26 HEST ST.CLAIR STREET
CINCINNATI , PHIO <.5260
TELEPHONE: 15131 684-7209
ACT SYSTEMS PROGRAM MANAGER
WILLIAM KYLE AOAHS
SUITE 200
907 WEST MORSE BLVD.
WINTER PARK, FLORIDA 32769
TELEPHONE: (3D5) 644-3900
UTILITY REPRESENTATIVE
MR GENE MOORE
CITY MANAGER
103 MANASSA5 DRIVE
MANASSAS PARK. VA. 22110
703-361-6160
STATE REPRESENTATIVE
MR. HUGH EGGBORN
REGIONAL ENGINEER
BJREAU OF SANITARY ENGINEERING
1D9 GOVERNORS STREET
RICHMOND, VIRGINA 23219
PHONE (BOO 7S6-6277
REGIONAL REPRESENTATIVE
1R JIM MtNUARING
HATER SUPPLY BRANCH US EPA
REGION III
6TH C WALNUT STREETS
PHILADELPHIA, PA 1910i
215-597-7736
-------
3-4-002
3/30/7(>
CITY OF MANASSAS PARK
SYSTEM FACTS
1975
POPULATION - SMS*
COUNTY
CITY QR TOHN
RETAIL SERVICE AREA
AREA OF RETAIL SERVICE AREA
NUMBER OF METERS
NUMBER OF ACCOUNTS
NUMBER OF FLAT RATE ACCOUNTS
PURCHASED HATER - RAH
TREATED
SOURCE HATER - GROUND
SURFACE
PIPE IN SYSTEM
ELEVATIONS - INTAKES
TREATMENT PLANTS
SERVICE AREA MIN.
SERVICE AREA MAX.
REVENUE PRODUCING HATER
TREATED WATER
MAX. DAY
MAX. HOUR
FISCAL YEAR
IMPLEMENTATION DATE
PROCESSING DATE
30045<.0
151000
2.00 SO MI
1800.
ieoo.
0.
D KG
0 MG
100.0 »
0.0 »
16 MI
225 FT
389 FT
103.1800 MG
177.6000 MG
6/30
3/30/76
5/27/76
-------
3-4-002
J/3D/76
CITY OF NANASSAS PARK
10-YEAR KEY 0 t M COST ANALYSIS
1965 1966 1967 1966 1969 1970
COST/YEAR
1971
1972
1973
1974
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACE.U1S1T10N
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
12761.
4456.
0.
3038.
20256.
169.
59.
0.
40.
268.
11941.
4170.
0.
2843.
18953.
156.
55.
0.
37.
248.
13661.
4770.
0.
3253.
21683.
174.
61.
0.
41.
277.
14070.
4913.
0.
3350.
22334.
COST/MG
180.
63.
0.
43.
286.
» OF TOTAL
15819.
5524.
0.
3766.
25109.
201.
70.
0.
48.
320.
17903.
6252.
0.
4263.
28418.
223.
79.
0.
53.
35V.
19735.
6892.
0.
4699.
31325.
243.
85.
0.
56.
3B6.
17452.
6094.
0.
4156.
27702.
167.
59.
0.
40.
266.
16380.
5720.
0.
3900.
26000.
169.
59.
0.
40.
268.
20419.
7131.
3.
4862.
32412.
19).
69.
3.
47.
31*.
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TRtATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
63.00 63.00 63.00 63.00
22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00
100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
63.00 63.03 63.00 63.00 63.00 63.30
22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.03 22.33
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30
15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.33
100.00 100.00 10&.00 100.00 100.00 100.33
PACE
-------
CITY OF MANASSAS PARK
TREATMENT INFORMATION
3-4-002
3/30/76
TREATMENT PROCESSES
HATER TREATED
TREATMENT CHEMICALS
IB/MO TREATED
10-YEAR CHEMICAL COST ANALYSIS
TOTAL COST
TREATED HATER
BILLED HO
t/HG TREATED
I/KG BILLED
1965
0.
108.
75.
0.
0.
1966
0.
109.
76.
0.
0.
1967
0.
112.
78.
0.
0.
1968
0.
111.
78.
0.
0.
1969
0.
112.
79.
0.
0.
1970
0.
115.
80.
0.
0.
1971
0.
116.
81.
0.
0.
1972
0.
U9.
10*.
0.
0.
1973
0.
139.
97.
0.
0.
197...
0.
178.
131.
0.
0.
PAGE
-------
3-<»-002
3/30/74
CITY DF HANASSAS PARK
RAH/TREATED WATER BUALITY INFORHATION
(UNITS ARE THE SAME AS SHOWN ON PAGE ABOVE)
CONSTITUENT » RAM / / * TREATED / /
HIN. MAX. TEST tIN. HAX. TEST
PAGE a
-------
PAYROLL »
HAN HOURS
MG BILLED CONSUMPTION
i/HG
MH/M&
1/MH
3-4-002
3/30/76
CITY OF NANASSAS PARK
10-YEAR LABOR COST ANALYSIS
1965
1966
1967
1970
1971
1972
1973
6289.
1.01
89.
82.
1.08
90SO.
6240.
78.
115.
80.
1 .45
6240.
1.55
9384.
6240.
79.
119.
79.
1.50
9879. 13157.
6240. 6240.
93. 81.
123. 162.
76. 77.
1.59 2.11
1974
13667. 14069. 16243.
6240. 6240. 624).
104. 97. 1D3.
131. 145. 157.
60. 64. 60.
2.19 2.26 2.t>0
00
PACE 10
-------
VO
3-4-002
3/30/7<>
CITY OF HANASSAS PARK
10-YEAR PONER COST ANALYSIS
1965 1966 1967 1966
1969 1970
1971 1972 1973 197*
POXER i
K * rl
t/MG
K M M/HG
6507. 6447. 7043. 6457. 6070. 6338. 5123. 5248. 4810. 5825.
86.
90.
77.
78.
63.
50.
50.
PAGE 12
-------
3-4-002
3/30/76
CITY OF NANASSAS PARK
10-YEAR DEPRECIATION ALLOCATION
o
1965 1966 1967
1968
1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974
DEPRECIATION COST I
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
8669. 8669. 8729.
3027. 3027. 3048.
0. 0. 0.
2064. 2064. 2078.
13760. 13760. 13855.
8795.
3071.
0.
2094.
13961.
8614. 8829. 8832. 8883. 8933. 1080*.
3078. 3083. 3084. 3102. 3120. 3773.
0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 3.
2099. 2102. 2103. 2115. 2127. 2572.
13991. 14014. 14020. 14100. 14160. 17149.
DEPRECIATION COST »/MC
SUPPORT SERVICES
NJ ACQUISITION
0
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
115. 114. 111.
40. 40. 39.
0. 0. 0.
27. 27. 27.
182. 180. 177.
113.
39.
0.
27.
179.
DEPRECIATION COST *
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
63.00 63.00 63.00
22.00 22.00 22.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
15.00 15.00 15.00
100.00 100.00 100.00
63.00
22.00
0.00
15.00
100.00
INTEREST COST
INTEREST »
INTEREST i/Mt
22577. 21703. 20853.
299. 264. 266.
19918.
255.
112. 110. 109. 85. 92. 135.
39. 38. 38. 30. 32. 37.
0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 3.
27. 26. 26. 20. 22. 25.
178. 17!,. 173. 135. 146. 16i.
0^ TOTAL
63.00 63.00 63.00 63.00 63.00 63.30
22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.33
0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30
15.00 15.00 15.00 15.30 15.00 15.33
100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.30
I
18983. 18048. 17028. 16006. 14996. 139S3.
242. 225. 210. 153. 154. 135.
-------
3-4-002
3/30/76
CITY OF NANASSA5 PARK
10-YEAR CAPITAL AND OPERATING COST H1ALYSIS
*
0 t M
DEPRECIATION
INTEREST
TOTAL
J/MG
»/MG 1975 DOLLARS
SPECIAL TAXES
0 t M * OF TUTAL
1965
20256.
13760.
22577.
S6592.
750.
1282.
0.
35.79
1966
18953.
13760.
21703.
5**16.
713.
1184.
0.
34.83
1967 1968 1969 1970
21683. 22334. 25109. 28418.
13855. 13961. 13991. 14014.
20B53. 19918. 18983. 180*8.
56392. 56213. 58083. 60*79.
719. 721. 739. 753.
1158. 1118. 1087. 10.
171*9.
13965.
6352D.
61S.
671.
D.
51.03
PAGE 16
-------
3-*-002
3/30/76
CITY OF MANA5SAS PARK
COST SUMMARY FOR 197*
SUPPORT SERVICES' ACQUISITION « TREATMENT « DISTRIBUTION INTEREST TDTAL TAXES TOTAL H/TAX
OF TOTAL 49.15
OF TOTAL 49.15 17.17 0.00 11.70 21.98 100.00 0.00 100.00
W/TAX
106.
17.17
17.17
0.
0.00
o.oo
72.
11.70
11.70
135.
21.98
21 .98
616.
100.00
100.00
NJ
NJ
IN SUMMARY:
DURING THE PAST 10 YEARS. » 828003. TOTAL COST IN 1975 DOLLARS PRODUCED
853. MG HATER FOR AN AVERAGE COST OF » 971./ MO (1975 DOLLARS)
PAGE 13
-------
U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
HATER SUPPLY COST STUDY
EPA CONTRACT 68-03-2071
FOR
TOHN OF CULPEPER
3-4-003
3/31/76
U)
EPA PROJECT OFFICER
ROBERT CLARK
MATER SUPPLY RESEARCH DIV.
MUNICIPAL ENVIRONMENTAL
RESEARCH LABORATORY
26 NEST ST.CLAIR STREET
CINCINNATI. OHIO 45260
TELEPHONE! (513) 684-7209
ACT SYSTEMS PROGRAM MANAGER
WILLIAM KYLE ADAMS
SUITE 200
807 WEST MORSE BLVD.
WINTER PARK. FLORIDA 32789
TELEPHONE: 13051 644-3900
UTILITY REPRESENTATIVE
MR. CLAUDE HUFFMAN
TOMN MANAGER
118 W. DAVIS STREET
CULPEPER. VIRGINIA 22701
(703)-825-4700
STATE REPRESENTATIVE
MR. JOHN GARLAND
REGIONAL ENGINEER
BUREAU OF SANITARY ENGINEERING
109 GOVERNERS STREET
RICHMOND. VIRGINIA 23219
(804) 786-0277
REGIONAL REPRESENTATIVE
MR. JIM MANMARING
HATER SUPPLY BRANCH
U. S. E. P. A.
REGION III
6TH t WALNUT STREETS
PHILADEPHIA, PA. 19106
(215) 597-7736
-------
3-4-003
3/31/76
TOWN OF CULPEPER
SYSTEH FACTS
1975
POPULATION - SMS*
COUNTY
CITY OR TOWN
RETAIL SERVICE AREA
AREA OF RETAIL SERVICE AREA
NUMBER OF METERS
NUMBER OF ACCOUNTS
NUMBER OF FLAT RATE ACCOUNTS
PURCHASED WATER - RAW
TREATED
SOURCE WATER - GROUND
SURFACE
PIPE IN SYSTEM
ELEVATIONS - INTAKES
TREATMENT PLANTS
SERVICE AREA MIN.
SERVICE AREA MAX.
REVENUE PRODUCING WATER
TREATED WATER
MAX. DAY
MAX. HOUR
FISCAL YEAR
IMPLEMENTATION DATE
PROCESSING DATE
NONE
20000
7269
7500.
8.00 SO Ml
2132.
12.
0 MG
0 MG
1.0 t
99.0 t
35 MI
35* FT
380 FT
340 FT
540 FT
259.8440 MG
447.0100 MG
1.47 HG
1.51 MG
6/30
3/31/7*
5/27/76
FMf I
-------
N3
t_n
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACCUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACCUISITION
TRtATMfcNT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACCUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
3-4-003
3/31/76
TOtiN OF CULPEPER
10-YEAS KEY 0 t M COST ANALYSIS
1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 «
COST/YEAR
2847. 4108. 2482. 3265. 3812. 5610. 14615. 14487. 20596. 24920.
o. o. o- o. o. o. o. o. o. o.
17147. 18746. 14697. 19388. 2*074. 30916. 34843. 45238. 57536. 64341.
19276. 23197. 19042. 21951. 32043. 29073. 37151. 37569. 51374. 6993i.
39269. 46051. 36221. 44604. 59929. 65599. 86609. 97295. 129506. 179197.
COST/HC
19. 25. 15. 18. 21. 28. 68. 72. 88. 96.
0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 3.
117. 114. 90. 107. 132. 152. 162. 225. 247. 325.
132. 141. 117. 122. 176. 143. 172. 187. 221. 269.
269. 280. 223. 247. 329. 323. 402. 484. 556. 690.
X OF TOTAL
7.25 8.92 6.85 7.32 6.36 8.55 16.87 14.89 15.90 13.91
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
43.66 40.71 40.58 43.47 40.17 47.13 40.23 46.50 44.43 47.07
49.09 50.37 52.57 49.21 53.47 44.32 42.89 38.61 39.67 39.03
100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
PAGE 4
-------
TREATMENT PROCESSES
SEDIMENTATION
COAGULATION
FILTRATION
CHLORINATION
FLUQRIOATION
TOTAL COST
TREATED WATER
BILLED MG
WHO TREATED
i/MG BILLED
TOKN Of CULPEPER
TREATMENT INFORMATION
« t MATER TREATED TREATMENT CHEMICALS *
100.* CHLORINE
100.* LIME
100. * ALUM
100. X SODA ASH
100. * H2SIF6 ACID 23*
10-YEAR CHEMICAL COST ANALYSIS
1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971
4077. 4125. 2226. 4173. 3755. 6358.
251. 283. 260. 310. 317. 349.
146. 164. 163. 180. 182. 203.
16. 15. 8. 13. 12. 18.
28. 25. 14. 2?. 21. 31.
3-4-003
3/31/76
LB/NG TREATED
48.0
121.3
409.6
307.1
44.2
1972 1973 1974 1975*
6633. 13720. 14754. 33262.
371. 346. 400. 447.
215. 201. 233. 2SO.
18. 40. 37. 74.
31. 68. 63. 128.
PAGE
-------
NJ
CONSTITUENT
ARSEnIC
oARIUM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
LEAD
M:RCURY
NITRATE IN)
SELENIUM
SILVER
FLUORIDE
CdLOk
COPPER
IRON
MANGANESE
SULPHATE
GROSS &ETA
TQHN OF CULPEPER
RAh/TREATEO HATER QUALITY INFORMATION
(UNITS ARE THE SAME AS SHQ»i\ ON PAGE ABUVEI
RAW
MIN. MAX.
/ /
TEST
TRtATEB
MIN. MAX.
3-
-------
PAYROLL »
HAN HOURS
HG BILLED CONSUMPTION
NJ
00
3-4-003
3/31/76
TOUN OF CULPEPER
10-YEAR LABOR COST ANALYSIS
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
197<>
20485. 23288.
10400. 10400.
146. 164.
140. 142.
71. 63.
1.97 2.24
19341. 25215. 29666. 43140. 45903. 54770.
10400. 14560. 14560. 14560. 16640. 18720.
163. 180. 182. 203. 215. 201.
119. 140. 163. 213. 213.
64.
1.86
81 .
1.73
163.
80.
2.04
213.
72.
2.96
77.
2.76
272.
93.
2.93
1975
72649. 80941.
18720. 20803.
233. 260.
312. 311.
80. 80.
3.88 3.39
PAGE 10
-------
3-4-003
3/31/76
TOWN OF CULPEPER
10-YEAR POHER COST ANALYSIS
1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 »
POWER 1
7828. 8756. 7277. 9428. 9359. 10421. 10794. 12339. 13935. 17013.
N>
53.
45.
51.
51.
61.
60.
PAGE 12
-------
TOWN OF CULPEPER
10-YEAR DEPRECIATION ALLOCATION
1966 1967 1968
1969
1970 1971
3-4-003
3/31/76
1972 1973 1974 1975
DEPRECIATION COST »
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
0. 0. 0.
0. 0. 0.
3050. 3551. 4542.
11444. 13326. 17047.
14494. 16879. 21589.
0.
0.
5118.
19209.
24327.
DEPRECIATION COST
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACuUlSITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
0. 0. 0.
0. 0. 0.
21. 22. 26.
78. 81. 105.
99. 103. 133.
0.
0.
28.
106.
135.
DEPRECIATION COST *
SUPPCRT SERVICES
AC.UISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRI uUTIDN
TOTAL
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
21.04 21.04 21.04
78 .96 78.96 73 .96
100.00 100.00 100.00
0.00
0.00
21 .04
78.96
100.00
INTEREST COST
INTEREST »
INTEREST S/MC,
15800. 23900. 23600.
108. 145. 145.
23200.
129.
0. 0.
0. 0.
5531. 5837.
20757. 21907.
26288. 27744.
1/MG
0. 0.
0. 0.
30. 29.
114. 108.
144. 137.
OF TOTAL
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
21.04 21.04
78.96 78.96
100.00 100.09
1
22800. 22400.
125. 110.
0. 0. 0. 0.
o. o. o. o.
5944. 6102. 6464. 6849.
22307. 22902. 24260. 25699.
28251. 29004. 30724. 32543.
0. 9. 0. 0.
0. 0. 0. 0.
28. 30. 28. 24.
104. 114. 104. 99.
131. 144. 132. 125.
0.00 0.00 0.00 O.D9
0.00 0 .00 0.00 O.DD
21.04 21.04 21.04 21.34
78.96 78.96 78.96 78.96
100.00 100.00 100.00 100.09
22029. 21657. 23909. 34629.
102. 108. 103. 133.
PAGE 14
-------
u>
0 t M
DEPRECIATION
INTEREST
TOTAL
i/MG
S/MC 1975 DOLLARS
SPECIAL TAXES
0 t M * OF TOTAL
3-4-003
3/31/76
TOMN OF CULPEPER
10-YEAR CAPITAL AND OPERATING COST ANALYSIS
1966 1967 1968 1969
1970
1971 1972
1973
1974 1975
39269. 46051. 36221. 44604. 59929. 65S99. 86609. 97295. 129506. 179197.
14494. 16879. 21589. 24327. 262S8. 27744. 28251. 29004. 30724. 32543.
15800. 23900. 23600. 23200. 22800. 22400. 22029. 21657. 23909. 34629.
69563. 86830. 81410. 92131. 109017. 115743. 136889. 147956. 184139. 246374.
476. 528. 501. 511. 598. 570. 636. 736. 791. 948.
790. 851. 776. 750. 832. 758. 820. 690. 662. 948.
0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 3.
56.45 53.04 44.49 48.41 54.97 56.68 63.27 65.76 70.33 72.73
PAGE 16
-------
s-fc-003
3/31/76
TOfcN OF CULPEPER
COST SUMMARY FOR 1975
SUPPORT SERVICES* ACQUISITION « TREATMENT « DISTRIBUTION INTEREST TOTAL TAXES TOTAL H/TAX
l/MG
1 OF TOTAL
* OF TOTAL
W/TAX
96.
10.11
10.11
0.
0.00
0.00
351.
37.01
37.01
368.
38.82
38.82
133.
14.06
14.06
948.
100.00
100.00
0.
0.00
948.
100.00
u>
N3
IN SUMMARY:
DURING THE PAST 10 YEARS. » 1625059. TOTAL COST IN 1975 DOLLARS PRODUCED
1943. KG WATER FOR AN AVERAGE COST OF $ 834./ MG (1975 DOLLARS)
PAGE 18
-------
APPENDIX B
This Appendix contains small water utilities printouts for Region V
water systems. If explanantion of a data element is required, refer to
Appendix A.
U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WATER SUPPLY COST STUDY
EPA CONTRACT 68-03-2071
FOR
WEST DUNDEE
5-1-001
6/22/76
EPA PROJECT OFFICER
ROBERT CLARK
HATER SUPPLY RESEARCH DIV.
MUNICIPAL ENVIRONMENTAL
RESEARCH LABORATORY
26 WEST ST.CLAIR STREET
CINCINNATI. OHIO 45260
TELEPHONE: <5i3) 684-7209
ACT SYSTEMS PROGRAM MANAGER
WILLIAM KYLE ADAMS
SUITE 200
807 WEST MORSE BLVD.
WINTER PARK, FLORIDA 32789
TELEPHONEl (305) 644-3900
UTILITY REPRESENTATIVE
MR. RAY JOHNSON
SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
VILLAGE HALL
102 S. SECOND ST.
WEST DUNDEE. ILLINOIS 60118
(312) 426-6161
STATE REPRESENTATIVE
MR. MARVIN SAILLARD
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTCTN ENGINEER
FIELD OPERATIONS
DIV. OF PUBLIC HATER SUPPLIES
33 5. STOLP AVE.
AURORA, ILLINOIS 60506
(312) 896-5001
EPA REPRESENTATIVE
MR. f. DONALD MADDOX
U. S. EPA
230 S. DEARBORN!
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604
(312) 353-7736
133
-------
5-1-001
6/22/76
WEST DUNDEE
SYSTEM FACTS
1975
POPULATION - SMSA
COUNTY
CITY OR TOWN
RETAIL SERVICE AREA
AREA OF RETAIL SERVICE AREA
NUMBER OF METERS
NUMBER OF ACCOUNTS
NUMBER OF FLAT RATE ACCOUNTS
PURCHASED WATER - RAH
TREATED
SOURCE HATER - GROUND
SURFACE
PIPE IN SYSTEM
ELEVATIONS - INTAKES
TREATMENT PLANTS
SERVICE AREA M1N.
SERVICE AREA MAX.
REVENUE PRODUCING HATER
TREATED HATER
MAX. DAY
MAX. HOUR
FISCAL YEAR
IMPLEMENTATION DATE
PROCESSING DATE
276000
3500
3500.
0.70 SO Ml
1000.
1000.
0.
0 MG
0 MG
100.0 X
0.0 *
17.5 MI
725 FT
712 FT
780 FT
124.6170 MG
163.2830 MG
.637 MG
4/30
6/22/76
7/26/76
PAGE
-------
WEST DUNDEE
10-YEAR KEY 0 t M COST ANALYSIS
1966
1967
1968
1969
COST/YEAR
1970
1971
1972
5-1-001
6/22/76
»»»»»»»«*»»»
1973 1974 1975
»»»**»»»«»
U)
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATHENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIbUTION
TOTAL
23737.
COST/MG
29155.
41106.
20682.
36719.
28645.
212.
* OF TOTAL
177.
339.
250.
5000.
17000.
1350.
13450.
36803.
6.20
3.!>7
36.55
100.30
PAGE
-------
BEST DUNDEE
TREATMENT INFORMATION
5-1-001
6/22/76
TREATMENT PROCESSES
AERATION
CHLORINATION
FLUOR10ATION
* HATER TREATED
99.X
100. *
100. *
TREATMENT CHEMICALS
CHLORINE
FLUORIDE
LB/MG TREATED
23. «
*.«
10-VEAR CHEMICAL COST ANALYSIS
1967 196S 1969 1970
1971
1972
1973
197*
1»75»
TOTAL COST
TREATED WATER
BILLED MG
S/MG TREATED
»/HG BILLED
--
150. 158.
112. 118.
.-
--
677.
153.
115.
'>.
6.
715.
156.
117.
5.
6.
738.
149.
111.
5.
7.
900.
157.
6.
1160.
163.
125.
7.
9.
PAGE
-------
5-1-001
6/22/76
WEST DUNDEE
RAW/TREATED MATER OUALITV INFORMATION
(UNITS ARE THE SAME AS SHOWN ON PACE ABOVE)
» CONSTITUENT
*
ARSENIC
BARIUM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
LEAD
MERCURY
NITRATE IN)
SELENIUM
SILVER
FLUORIDE
CHLORIDE
COPPER
IRON
MANGANESE
SULPHATE
ZINC
GROSS BETA
GROSS ALPHA
RAH 02/17/76 * TREATED
» MIN. MAX. TEST * M1N. MAX.
0.00
6.5
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0000
0.0
0.00
0.00
0.6
2.3
0.01
0.1
0.01
2.
0.0
25.9*-2.5
l5.6*-3.2
02/17/76
TEST
0.00
7.3
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0001
0.1
0.00
0.00
1.3
5.8
0.00
0.0
0.00
3.
0.0
22.5+-Z.3
12.8»-2.9
PAGE 3
-------
I-1
to
00
5-1-001
6/22/76
NEST DUNDEE
10-YEAR LABOR COST ANALYSIS
1966 1967
1966
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
197* 1975
PAYROLL 1
MAN HOURS
MG BILLED CONSUMPTION
t/MG
MH/MG
2477. 297*. 4259. 27*4. 3735.
112. 116. 115. 117. 111. 11*. 125.
22. 26. 38. 2*. 3D.
PAGE 10
-------
5-1-001
6/22/76
WEST DUNDEE
10-YEAR POWER COST ANALYSIS
» 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972
POWER S 5653. 7191. 7876. 6592. 8727. 8724.
K W H 411170. 518400. 560918. 443724. 546067. 518501.
»/M6 ~ -- 71. 56. 76. 75.
K H H/MG -- ~ 5021. 3757. 4767. 4449.
1973
10743.
600961.
97.
5401.
1974
13148.
571339.
115.
4992.
1975
1503*.
629591.
121.
5052.
PAGE 12
-------
WEST DUNDEE
10-YEAR DEPRECIATION ALLOCATION
1966 1967 1968 1969
1970 1971
1972
5-1-001
6/22/76
1973 1974 1975
DEPRECIATION COST »
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACuUlSI TI 3N
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
INTEREST 1
INTEREST i/Ml,
180.
2610.
180.
6030.
9000.
DEPRECIATION COST
2.
23.
2.
54.
81.
DEPRECIATION COST *
2.00
29.00
2.00
67.00
100.00
INTEREST COST
0.
0.
180. 180.
2610. 2610.
130. 180.
6030. 6030.
9000. 9000.
t/MG
2. 2.
22. 23.
2. 2.
51. 53.
76. 79.
OF TOTAL
2.00 2.03
29.00 29.00
2.00 2.00
67.00 67.00
130.00 100.00
1
0. 0.
0. 0.
180.
2610.
180.
6030.
9000.
2.
22.
2.
52.
77.
2.00
29.00
2.00
67.00
IOC. 00
0.
0.
188. 192. 193.
2722. 2790. 2804.
188. 192. 193.
6289. 6445. 647».
9387. 9620. 9670.
2. 2. 2.
24. 24. 23.
2. 2. 2.
57. 56. 52.
84. 84. 78.
2.00 2.00 2.00
29.00 29.00 29.33
2.00 2.00 2.00
67.00 67.00 67.00
100.00 100.00 100.30
0. 0. 3.
0. 0. 3 .
PAGE 14
-------
5-1-001
6/22/76
WEST DUNDEE
10-YEAR CAPITAL AND OPERATING COST ANALYSIS
* 1966 1967 1968 1969
0 I K -- 23737.
DEPRECIATION 9000.
INTEREST -- -- -- 0.
TOTAL ~ -- 32737.
S/M6 -- -- 293.
*/M6 1975 DOLLARS -- -- -- 431.
SPECIAL TAXES -- -- 0.
0 t M * OF TOTAL 72.51
1970
2915S.
9000.
0.
38155.
323.
449.
0.
76. 41
1971
41106.
9000.
0.
50106.
437.
582.
0.
82.04
1972
20682.
9000.
0.
29682.
255.
329.
0.
69.68
1973
36719.
9387.
0.
46106.
414.
501.
a.
79.64
1974
28645.
9620.
0.
3826S.
334.
364.
0.
74.86
1975
36800.
9679.
0.
46470.
373.
373.
D.
79.19
PAGE 16
-------
5-1-001
6/22/76
WEST DUNDEE
COST SUMMARY FOR 1975
SUPPORT SERVICES* ACOU1S1T10N TREATMENT DISTRIBUTION INTEREST ' TOTAL TAXES TOTAL N/TAX
S/HC
t OF TOTAL
* OF TOTAL
H/TAX
42.
11.18
11.18
159.
42.62
42.62
12.
3.32
3.32
160.
42.89
42.89
0.
0.00
0.00
373.
100.00
100.00
0.
0.00
373.
100.00
-P-
NJ
IN SUMMARY:
DURING THE PAST 7 YEARS. » 350056. TGTAL COST IN 1975 DOLLARS PRODUCED
811. hG MATER FOR AN AVERAGE COST OF 1 431./ NG (1975 DOLLARS)
PAGE 18
-------
U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
MATER SUPPLY COST STUDY
EPA CONTRACT 68-03-2071
FOR
AL&ONOUN
5-1-002
6/23/76
EPA PROJECT OFFICER
ROBERT CLARK
HATER SUPPLY RESEARCH OIV.
MUNICIPAL ENVIRONMENTAL
RESEARCH LABORATORY
26 WEST ST.CLAIR STREET
CINCINNATI. OHIO 45260
TELEPHONE: (513) 684-7209
ACT SYSTEMS PROGRAM MANAGER
NlLLItH KYLE ADA1S
SUITE 200
807 WEST MORSE BLVD.
WINTER PARK. FLORIDA 32789
TELEPHONE: oos) 6*4-3900
UTILITY REPRESENTATIVE
MR. HOWARD FISH
WATER WORKS SUPERINTENDENT
VILLAGE HALL
2 SOUTH MAIN ST.
ALGONQUIN. ILLINOIS 60102
(312) 658-4322
STATE REPRESENTATIVE
MR. MARVIN SAULARO
ENVIRONEMNTAL PRTCTN ENGINEER
DIV Of PUBLIC WATER SUPPLIES
33 S. STOLP AVE.
AURORA. ILLINOIS 60506
1312) 896-5001
EPA REGIONAL REPRESENTATIVE
MR. F. DONALD NADDOX
U. S. EPA
230 S. DEARBORNE
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604
(312) 353-7736
-------
5-1-002
6/23/76
ALSONOUN
SYSTEM FACTS
1975
POPULATION - SMSA
COUNTY
CITY OR TOHN
RETAIL SERVICE AREA
AREA OF RETAIL SERVICE AREA
NUMBER OF METERS
NUMBER OF ACCOUNTS
NUMBER OF FLAT RATE ACCOUNTS
PURCHASED WATER - RAH
TREATED
SOURCE HATER - GROUND
SURFACE
PIPE IN SYSTEM
ELEVATIONS - INTAKES
TREATMENT PLANTS
SERVICE AREA MIN.
SERVICE AREA MAX.
REVENUE PRODUCING HATER
TREATED HATER
MAX. DAY
MAX. HOUR
FISCAL YEAR
IMPLEMENTATION DATE
PROCESSING DATE
N.A.
120000
1.300
4000.
2.50 SO
1200.
1200.
0.
0 KG
0 MG
100.0 *
0.0 *
736 FT
890 FT
96.9860 MG
149.5200 MG
.650 MG
12/31
6/23/76
7/26/76
PAGE
-------
5-1-002
6/23/76
ALGONQUN
10-YEAR KEY 0 t H COST ANALYSIS
> 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 197<>
COST/YEAR
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL 18320. 20809. 28000. 27123. 32815. 46028. 43083. 48591. 50849. 5824*.
COST/M6
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL 261. 259. 325. 300. 407. 593. 505. 558. 560. 601.
* OF TOTAL
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
PACE <
-------
TREATMENT PROCESSES
CHLORINATION
FLUORIOAT1 UN
STABILIZATION
TUTAL COST
TREATED WATER
SILLED Mb
i/Mb TREATED
»/MG SILLED
5-1-002
6/23/74
ALGONOUN
TREATMENT INFORMATION
« * HATER TREATED » ' TREATMENT CHEMICALS L8/H& TREATED
ICO.* CHLORINE 25.4
100.* FLUORIDE <..5
ICO.* D-SOL V-&RANULAR 16.1
10-YEAR CHEMICAL COST ANALYSIS
1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 197<.«
172D.
112. 128. 1*1. 178. 131. 142. 1<.8. 179. 179. 150.
70. 80. 86. 90. 81. 78. 85. 87. 91. 97.
12.
18.
PAKE
-------
S-1O02
t/23/7t
ALGONOUN
RAH/TREATED HATER OUALITY INFORMATION
(UNITS ARE THE SAME AS 5HOKN ON PACE ABOVE I
« CONSTITUENT
u
BARIUM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
L:AO
MERCURY
NITRATE IN)
SILVER
FLUORIDE
CHLORIDE
COPPER
IRON
MANGANESE
SULPHATE
ZINC
GROSS BETA
GROSS ALPHA
A
» MIN.
0.2
0.00
0.0
0.00
<0.0005
3.*
0.0
0.2
23.
0.0
0.0
0.0
63.
0.0
2*-l
0»-0
RAH 11/02/71 « TREATEO 11/02/71
MAX. TEST » MIN. MAX. TEST
7.
0.00
0.0
0.00
<0.0005
0.0
0.0
1.0
5.4
0.0
0.05
0.0
0
0.0
l**-3
7*-2
PAKE I
-------
5-1-002
6/23/76
AL40NOUN
10-YEAR LABOR COST ANALYSIS
1965
1966 1967
1970
1971
1972
1973 1971.
P»YKULL S
HAN HOURS
KG BILLED CONSUMPTION
1/MC
OO
7
-------
5-1-002
ALGONOUN
10-YEAR PDHER COST ANALYSIS
> 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1973 1971 1972 1973 1974
POWER $ 3407. 3388. 3779. 3839. 3372. 3716. 4576. 5920. 58B3. 6813.
HUH ------ 317141. 355063.
S/MG 49. 42. 44. 42. 42. 48. 54. 68. &5. 73.
K X H/M& -- 3492. 3661.
PACE 12
-------
«
5-1-002
6/23/76
ALtONOUN
10-YEAR DEPRECIATION ALLOCATION
1965 1966
1967
1968
1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 »
DEPRECIATION COST t
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
25. 25.
313. 313.
25. 25.
887. 887.
1250. 1250.
112.
1405.
112.
3989.
5619.
115.
1434.
115.
4072.
5736.
DEPRECIATION COST
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACOUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
0. 0.
4. 4.
0. 0.
13. 11.
18. 16.
1-
16.
1.
46.
65.
1.
16.
1.
45.
63.
DEPRECIATION COST »
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACOU1SITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
2.00 2.00
25.00 25.00
2.00 2.00
71.00 71.00
100.00 100.00
2.00
25.00
2.00
71.00
100.00
2.00
25.00
2.00
71.00
100.00
INTEREST COST
INTEREST t
INTEREST »/Ht
4433. 4266.
63. S3.
4386.
SI.
4344.
48.
115. 115. 115. 119. 130. 153.
1434. 1434. 1434. 1484. 1625. 191*.
115. 115. 115. 119. 130. 153.
4072. 4072. 4072. 4214. !>6l6. 5437.
5736. 5736. 5736. 5936. 6501. 765}.
l/MG
1. 1. 1. 1. 1. I.
16. 18. 17. 17. 18. 23.
1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 2.
SO. 52. 46. 48. 51. 56.
71. 7<>. 67. 68. 72. 79.
OF TOTAL
2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.30
25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.09 25.53
2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.30
71.00 71.00 71.00 71.00 71.00 71.00
100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.30
t
4310. 4246. 4252. 4131. 4060. 342i.
53. 55. 50. 47. 45. 35.
PACE 14
-------
5-1-002
6/33/74
ALSONOUN
10-YEAR CAPITAL AND OPERATING COST ANALYSIS
0 (. M
DEPRECIATION
INTEREST
TOTAL
S/NG
t/HG 1975 DOLLARS
SPECIAL TAXES
U t M X OF TOTAL
1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970
18320. 20809. 28000. 27123. 32815. 46028.
1250. 1250. 5619. 5736. 5736. 5736.
4433. 4266. 4386. 4344. 4310. 4246.
24003. 26325. 38005. 37203. 42860. 56010.
342. 328. 441. 411. 531. 722.
585. 544. 711. 638. 781. 1003.
0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
76.32 79.05 73.67 72.91 76.56 82.18
1971 1972
43083. 48591.
5736. 5936.
4252. 4131.
53071. 58658.
622. 674.
827. 869.
0. 0.
81.18 82.84
1973
50849.
6501.
4060.
61410.
676.
818.
0.
82.80
1974
58244.
7659.
342S.
69329.
715.
77».
0.
84. )1
PACE 16
-------
5-1-002
ALODNOUN
COST SUMMARY FOR 197*
'SUPPORT SERVICES" ACQUISITION < TREATMENT « DISTRIBUTION INTEREST TOTAL
TMES TOTAL W/TAX
* OF TOTAL
* OF TUTAL
H/TAX
715.
100.00
100.00
715.
0.00 100.00
IN SUMMARY:
DURING THE PAST 10 YEARS, t 640580. TOTAL COST IN 1975 DOLLARS PRODUCED
84*. HG MATER FOR AN AVERAGE COST OF t 758. / MO (1975 DOLLARS)
-------
U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
MATER SUPPLY COST STUDY
EPA CONTRACT 68-03-2071
FOR
LAKE ZURICH
5-1-003
6/24/76
EPA PROJECT OFFICER
ROBERT CLARK
MATER SUPPLY RESEARCH DIV.
MUNICIPAL ENVIRONMENTAL
RESEARCH LABORATORY
26 WEST ST.CLAIR STREET
CINCINNATI. OHIO 45260
TELEPHONE: ism 684-7209
tCT SYSTEMS PROGRAM MANAGER
WILLIAM KYLE AOA1S
SUITE 200
807 NEST NORSE BLVD.
WINTER PARK, FLORIDA 32789
TELEPHONE: (305) 644-3900
UTILITY REPRESENTATIVE
MR. DEL HOSLER
VILLAGE MANAGER
VILLAGE HALL
61 HEST MAIN STREET
LAKE lUklCH. ILLINOIS 60047
(312) 438-5143
STATE REPRESENTATIVE
MR. MARVIN SAILLARD
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER
OIV. OF PJBLIC WATER SUPPLIES
33 SOUTH STOLP AVENUE
AURORA. ILLINOIS 60506
(312) 896-5001
EPA REGIONAL REPRESENTATIVE
MR. F. DONALD MAODOX
U. S. EPA
230 S. DEARBORNE
CHICAGO. ILLINOIS 60604
(312) 353-7736
-------
$-1-003
Ui
LAKE ZURICH
SYSTEM FACTS
1975
POPULATION - SMS*
COUNTY
CITY OR TOHN
RETAIL SERVICE AREA
AREA OF RETAIL SERVICE AREA
NUMBER OF METERS
NUMBER OF ACCOUNTS
NUMBER OF FLAT RATE ACCOUNTS
PURCHASED WATER - RAM
TREATED
SOURCE HATER - GROUND
SURFACE
PIPE IN SYSTEM
ELEVATIONS - INTAKES
TREATMENT PLANTS
SERVICE AREA MIN.
SERVICE AREA MAX.
REVENUE PRODUCING HATER
TREATED WATER
KAX. DAY
MAX. HOUR
FISCAL YEAR
IMPLEMENTATION DATE
PROCESSING DATE
67»9
4789.
3.50 SO MI
2035.
2035.
0.
0 MG
0 MG
100.0 t
0.0 X
15 MI
855 FT
2<>?.2000 HG
323.0900 MG
4/30
PAGE
-------
f-1-001
4/24/76
LAKE ZURICH
10-YEAR KEY DIM COST ANALYSIS
Ui
»»!»»»»*»»**»»*»»»»»»*»»*»«»»»»*»*»»»*»»**»»*»»»******»»**»*»***»»»»»*
> 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975
COST/YEAR
SUPPORT SERVICES -- -- -- ~ -- -- 15563.
ACQUISITION -- -- -- " 25000.
TREATMENT -- ~ -- -- -- 4231.
DISTRIBUTION ~ ~ -- 40000.
TOTAL 24379. 36752. 56055. 82193. 77061. 746*1. 8479*.
COST/NC
SUPPORT SERVICES « -- i2.
ACQUISITION -- -- .. 103.
TREATMENT -- 17.
DISTRIBUTION « -- -- -- Hi.
TOTAL -- « 133. 194. 2*3. 362. 338. 342. 340.
* OF TOTAL
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
18.35
29. ve
47.17
100.13
PACE 4
-------
LAKE ZURICH
TREATMENT INFORMATION
5-1-003
6/2*/76
TREATMENT PROCESSES
CHLORINATION
* HATER TREATED
100. <
TREATMENT CHEMICALS
CHLORINE
LB/MG TREATED
37.1
10-YEAR CHEMICAL COST ANALYSIS
^
TOTA1 COST
TREATED MATER
BILLED Mb
S/NG TREATED
»/MG BILLED
1966 1967 196S 1969 1970
_
185. 163. 201. 206. 21<>.
1«1. U3. !».
--
1971
225.
198.
--
..
1972
..
259.
227.
.-
1973 197<« 1975»
2367.
250. 275. 323.
228. 21«. 2^9.
7.
».
PACE
-------
5-1-001
» mm
LAKE ZURICH
RAW/TREATED WATER QUALITY INFORMATION
(UNITS ARE THE SANE AS SHOWN ON PACE ABOVE)
CONSTITUENT
BARIUM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
LEAD
NITRATE
-------
S-I-OOJ
4/24/76
LAKE ZURICH
10-YEAR LASOR COST ANALYSIS
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
197*
1975
PAYROLL *
MAN HOURS
HC SILLED CONSUMPTION
t/MC
MH/M6
111 .
111.
1S9.
22S.
21*.
OO
PAGE 10
-------
5-1-009
6/Z*/76
LAKE ZURICH
10-YEAR PONER COST ANALYSIS
1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 197Z 1973 197* 1»75 *
POWER 1
K H H
»/HG
K H H/MG
1173870.
Ln
VD
PAGE 12
-------
LAKE ZURICH
10-YEAR DEPRECIATION ALLOCATION
1966 1967 1968 1969
1970 1971
1972
5-1-003
6/24/76
1973 1974 1975
DEPRECIATION COST *
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACOUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
SUPPORT SERVICES
O-, ACQUISITION
0
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACuuismoN
TREATMENT
OISTR1BUTION
TOTAL
INTEREST t
INTEREST i/MG
(96.
1792.
jsa.
14696.
1792*.
DEPRECIATION COST
S.
10.
2.
80.
98.
DEPRECIATION COST «
5.00
10.00
2.00
92.00
99.00
INTEREST COST
23884.
114.
1165. 1217.
2330. 2433 .
<>66. 487.
19109. 19952.
23304. 24332.
i/MC
6. 6.
12. 12.
2. 2.
101. 101.
123. 123.
OF TOTAL
5.00 5.00
10.00 10.00
2.00 2.00
92.00 82.30
99.00 99.00
I
28770. 3M44.
152. 1S3.
1403.
2807.
561.
23016.
28068.
6.
12.
2.
102.
124,
5.00
10.00
2.00
82.00
99.00
54*. ".2.
240.
1849. 2139. 2197.
3699. 4277. 4394.
740. 855. 879.
30329. 35073. 3646).
36987. 42771. 43939.
8. 10. 9.
16. 20. 18.
3. 4. 4.
133. 161. 146.
162. 196. 174.
5.00 5.00 5.30
10.00 10.00 10.00
2.00 2.03 2.3}
82.00 52.00 S3. 33
99.09 99.03 103.33
69593. 68991. 65895.
305. 316. 2ii.
PASE 14
-------
5-1-003
6/24/76
LAKE ZURICH
10-YEAR CAPITAL AND OPERATING COST ANALYSIS
*
0 t H
DEPRECIATION
INTEREST
TOTAL
l/MG
»/MG 1975 DOLLARS
SPECIAL TAXES
0 t H » OF TOTAL
1966 1967 1968 1969
24379.
17922.
2086*.
63186.
346.
508.
0.
38.58
1970
367S2.
2330*.
28770.
S8826.
(.70.
653.
0.
41.38
1971
$6055.
24332.
36166.
116553.
589.
783.
0.
48.09
1972
82193.
28068.
5*442.
164703.
726.
937.
0.
49.90
1973
77061.
36987.
69593.
183640.
80S.
973.
0.
41. Vi
1974
74641.
42771.
68991.
186403.
853.
930.
0.
40.04
1975
84794.
4393».
65895.
194627.
781.
781.
3.
43.57
PAGE IS
-------
S-J-003
(v/2*/76
LAKE ZURICH
COST SUMMARY FOR 1975
-SUPPORT SERVICES' ACQUISITION TREATMENT DISTRIBUTION INTEREST TOTAL TAXES TOTAL K/TAX
l/MG 71. 11$. 21. 307. 264. 761. 0. 7*1.
* OF TOTAL 9.12 IS.10 2.63 39.29 33.16 100.00
* OF TOTAL 9.12 IS.10 2.fc3 39.29 33.»& 100.00 0.00 100.00
K/TAX
ON
KJ
IN SUMMARY:
DURING THE PAST 7 YEARS. * 1203844. TOTAL COST IN 1975 DOLLARS PRODUCED
1492. HG HATER FOR AN AVERAGE COST OF » 807./ MG (1975 DOLLARS)
PAGE 19
-------
U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
MATER SUPPLY COST STUDY
EPA CONTRACT 68-03-2071
FOR
BURLINGTON
5-1-004
6/25/76
U)
EPA PROJECT OFFICER
ROBERT CLARK
HATER SUPPLY RESEARCH 01V.
MUNICIPAL ENVIRONMENTAL
RESEARCH LABORATORY
26 NEST ST.CLAIR STREET
CINCINNATI. OHIO 45260
TELEPHONE:
-------
5-1-00*
6/25/76
BURLINGTON
SYSTEM FACTS
1975
POPULATION - SMSA
COUNTY
CITY OR TOUN
RETAIL SERVICE AREA
AREA DF RETAIL SERVICE AREA
NUMBER OF METERS
NUMBER OF ACCOUNTS
NUMBER DF FLAT RATE ACCOUNTS
PURCHASED WATER - RAW
TREATED
SOURCE NATER - GROUND
SURFACE
PIPE IN SYSTEM
ELEVATIONS - INTAKES
TREATMENT PLANTS
SERVICE AREA MIN.
SERVICE AREA MAX.
REVENUE PRODUCING HATER
TREATED HATER
MAX. DAY
MAX. HOUR
FISCAL TEAR
IMPLEMENTATION DATE
PROCESSING DATE
N.A.
251005
390
384.
0.25 SO Ml
8.
D M&
0 MG
100.0 *
0.0 1
910 FT
935 FT
20.5000 M&
24.11*0 MG
.080 MG
6/30
6/25/76
7/26/76
PAGE 2
-------
Ln
5-1-004
6/25/7*
BURL1N6TON
10-YEAR KEY 0 C M COST ANALYSIS
1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971
COST/YEAR
1972
1973
1974
1975
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
0 ISTRI6UTIGN
TLTAL
746.
1238.
0.
2987.
4971.
34.
56.
0.
134.
223.
15.00
24.90
0.00
60.10
100.00
667.
1523.
0.
22S6.
4446.
33.
75.
0.
111.
218.
15.00
34.26
0.00
50.74
100.00
675.
915.
0.
2910.
4500.
33.
45.
0.
143.
221.
15.00
20.33
0.00
64.67
100.00
651.
1082.
50.
3691.
5673.
COST/KG
42.
S3.
2.
181.
279.
» DF TOTAL
15.00
19.06
0.86
65.06
100.00
571.
1246.
55.
1933.
3804.
28.
61.
3.
95.
186.
15.00
32.75
1.45
50.80
100.00
681.
1414.
72.
2374.
4542.
33.
69.
4.
116.
223.
15.00
31.14
1.60
52.27
100.00
957.
1549.
50.
3825.
6381.
47.
76.
2.
188.
313.
15.00
24.27
0.78
59.95
100.00
1050.
1420.
100.
4430.
7000.
51.
70.
5.
217.
343.
15.00
20.29
1.43
63.29
100.00
1722.
1696.
990.
4204.
8612.
76.
75.
44.
185.
379.
20.00
19.69
11.50
48.81
100.03
2682.
2195.
2145.
3706.
10723.
131.
137.
105.
181.
523.
25.30
20. Vi
19.99
34.55
100.33
PAGE
-------
ON
BURLINGTON
TREATMENT INFORMATION
TREATMENT PROCESSES * t WATER TREATED ° TREATMENT CHEMICALS *
CHLORINAT10N 100.* CHLORINE
FLUORIDATION 100.* FLUORIDE
AOUADINE
10-YEAR CHEMICAL COST ANALYSIS
1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971
TOTAL COST -- 50. 55. 72.
TREATED MATER 26. 24. 24. 24. 24. 24.
BILLED MG 22. 20. JO. 20. 20. 20.
t/MG TREATED 2. 2. 3.
WHS BILLED -- -- 2. 3. < .
5-1-004
6/25/7b
LB/MG TREATED »
18.7
37.9
15.1
1972 1973 1974 1375*
50. 89. 990. 21i5.
24. 24. 27. 24.
20. 20. Z3. 20.
2. 4. 37. S9.
2. 4. 44. IDS.
PAGE
-------
5-1-00*
6/25/74
BURLINGTON
RAM/TREATED HATER DUALITY INFORMATION
(UNITS ARE THE SANE AS SHOKN ON PACE IBOVE)
* CONSTITUENT
ARSENIC
BARIUM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
LEAD
MERCURY
NITRATE IN)
SELENIUM
SILVER
FLUORIDE
CHLORIDE
COPPER
IRON
MANGANESE
SULPHATE
ZINC
GROSS BETA
GROSS ALPHA
* RAM 02/17/76 » TREATED
* MIN. MAX. TEST * MIN. NAX.
0.00
2.3
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0000
0.3
0.00
0.00
0.6
1.5
0.00
0.2
0.00
0.0
0.0
127*-2.2
14.5+-3.0
02/17/76
TEST *
0.00
0.1
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0000
0.1
0.00
0.00
1.1
7.3
0.02
0.1
0.00
4.
0.0
5.0»-1.5
2.2+-1.*
PAGE 8
-------
PAYROLL »
HAN HOURS
MC BILLED CONSUMPTION
1/HC
MH/HG
5-1-OD4
6/25/76
BURLINGTON
10-YEAR LABOR COST ANALYSIS
1966
1967
1966
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
714.
372.
21 .
32.
17.
1.92
372.
20.
41.
16.
2.26
372.
2.26
1130.
372.
20.
55.
18.
3.04
1180.
372.
20.
58.
ia.
3.17
372.
18.
1200.
372.
20.
59.
18.
1283.
372.
20.
63.
13.
3.45
372.
23.
90.
It..
5.48
1975
2243.
372.
20.
139.
19.
6.02
00
PAGE 10
-------
5-1-004
6/25/76
BURLINGTON
10-YEAR POKER COST ANALYSIS
1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975
POWER »
K W H
i/MG
K M H/MC
1238. 1523. 915. 1082. 1246. 1414. 1549. 1420. 1696. 219$.
56.
75.
45.
53.
61.
76.
70.
75. 107.
PAGE
-------
5-1-004
6/25/76
BURLINGTON
10-YEAR DEPRECIATION ALLOCATION
1966 1967 1968
1969
1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975
DEPRECIATION COST $
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACOUI SI T10N
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
0. 0. 0.
265. 287. 303.
88. 96. 101.
1415. 1532. 1617.
1769. 1915. 2021.
0.
303.
101.
1617.
2021 .
DEPRECIATION COST
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
0. 0. 0.
12. 14. 15.
4. 5. 5.
64. 75. 79.
80. 94. 99.
0.
15.
5.
79.
99.
DEPRECIATION COST *
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACOUISIT10N
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
0.00 0.00 0.00
15.00 15.00 15.00
5,00 5.00 5.00
90.00 80.00 80.00
100.00 100.00 100.00
0.00
15.00
5.00
80.00
100.00
INTEREST COST
INTEREST t
INTEREST »/NG
605. 495. 385.
27. 24. 19.
275.
13.
0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 3.
303. 303. 303. 303. 332. 353.
101. 101. 101. 101. 111. 119.
1617. 1617. 1617. 1617. 1769. 1883.
2021. 2021. 2021. 2031. 2211. 2353.
S/Mt
0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 3.
15. 15. 15. 15. 15. 17.
5. 5. 5. S. 5. i.
79. 79. 79. 79. 76. 92.
99. 99. 99. 99. 97. 115.
OF TOTAL
0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30
15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15. 3D
5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
80.00 80.00 80.00 80.00 80.00 80.33
100.00 100.00 100.00 100,00 100.00 100.00
1
110. 110. 0. 0. 0. 3.
5. 5. 0. 0. 0. 0.
PACE 14
-------
5-1-00*
6/25/76
BURLINGTON
10-YEAR CAPITAL AND OPERATING COST ANALYSIS
1966
1967
1968
1969'
1970
1971
1972
1973
197*
1975
0 t H
DEPRECIATION
INTEREST
TOTAL
»/MG
t/NG 1975 DOLLARS
SPECIAL TAXES
0 [ M » OF TOTAL
4971.
1769.
60S.
7345.
330.
548.
0.
67.68
4446.
1915.
495.
6857.
337.
342.
0.
64.85
4500.
2021.
385.
6906.
339.
525.
0.
65.16
5673.
2021.
275.
7969.
391.
574.
0.
71.19
3804.
2021.
110.
5935.
291.
404.
0.
64.09
4542.
2021.
110.
6673.
327.
435.
0.
68.06
6381.
2021.
0.
8402.
412.
531.
0.
75.95
7000.
2021.
0.
9021.
442.
535.
0.
77.60
8612. 10728.
2211. 2350.
0. 3.
10823.
477.
519.
0.
79.57
13078.
639.
. 633.
3.
82.33
"AGE 16
-------
BURLINGTON
COST SUMMARY FOR 1975
5-1-00".
6/35/76
SUPPORT SERVICES' AC6UIS1TION TREATMENT « DISTRIBUTION INTEREST
TOTAL TAXES
TOTAL H/TAX
> OF TbTAL
« OF TLTAL
/TAX
20.51
124.
19.48
19.48
110.
17.30
17.30
373.
0.
0.00
0.00
b3B.
100.00
100.00
0.00
638.
100.00
IN SUMMARY:
DURING THE PAST 10 YEARS. » 1091.06. TOTAL COST IN 1975 DOLLARS PRODUCED
208. MG MATER FOR AN AVERAGE COST OF t 525./ MG (1975 DOLLARS)
PACE 16
-------
U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
HATER SUPPLY COST STUDY
EPA CONTRACT 68-03-2071
FOR
TOWN OF LONELL
5-2-001
6/21/76
EPA PROJECT OFFICER
ROBERT CLARK
MATER SUPPLY RESEARCH DIV.
MUNICIPAL ENVIRONMENTAL
RESEARCH LABORATORY
26 WEST ST.CLAIR STREET
CINCINNATI. OHIO 45260
TELEPHONE: (sisi 684-7209
ACT SYSTEMS PROGRAM MANAGER
WILLIAM KYLE AOAMS
SUITE 200
807 WEST MORSE BLVD.
WINTER PARK, FLORIDA 32789
TELEPHONE: oosi 644-3900
UTILITY REPRESENTATIVE
MR. JOHN BARTHOLOMEW
PLANT OPERATOR
507 JOE MARTIN RD.
LOWELL. INDIANA 46356
(219) 696-7794
STATE REPRESENTATIVE
MR. ERNEST L. BURCHAM
DIV. OF SANITARY ENGINEERING
1NO. STATE BOARD OF HEALTH
1330 W. MICHIGAN STREET
INDIANAPOLIS. IND. 46206
(317) 633-4888
EPA REGIONAL REPRESENTATIVE
MR. F. DONALD HADOOX
U. S. EPA
230 S. DEARBORNS
CHICAGO. ILLINOIS 60604
(312) 353-7736
-------
5-2-001
6/21/76
TOWN OF LOWELL
SYSTEM FACTS
1975
POPULATION - SMSA
COUNTY
CITY OR TOWN
RETAIL SERVICE AREA
AREA OF RETAIL SERVICE AREA
NUMBER OF METERS
NUMBER OF ACCOUNTS
NUMBER OF FLAT RATE ACCOUNTS
PURCHASED HATER - RAH
TREATED
SOURCE HATER - GROUND
SURFACE
PIPE IN SYSTEM
ELEVATIONS - INTAKES
TREATMENT PLANTS
SERVICE AREA M1N.
SERVICE AREA MAX.
REVENUE PRODUCING HATER
TREATED HATER
MAX. DAY
MAX. HOUR
FISCAL YEAR
IMPLEMENTATION DATE
PROCESSING DATE
N.A.
5*6253
3839
530*.
d.OO SO MI
1612.
1612.
0.
0 MG
0 MG
100.0 *
0.0 *
16 MI
151.7000 MG
26<>.3400 MG
.796 MG
.86". MG
12/31
6/21/76
7/26/76
PAGE
-------
TOWN OF LOWELL
10-YEAR KEY 0 C H COST ANALYSIS
5-2-001
6/21/76
1966 1967
Ol
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
1968 1969 1970
COST/YEAR
1971
1972 1973
1974
1975
35584. 40000. 46640. 48057. 59966. 71737. 90038. 102464.
COST/MC
385.
476.
502. 496. 534.
* OF TOTAL
630.
713.
695.
32033.
14528.
12159.
33767.
92487.
206.
93.
78.
217.
595.
34.63
IS.71
13. IS
36. 51
100.00
42709.
21362.
1355S.
63327.
1409S2.
282.
141.
89.
417.
929.
30.30
15.16
9.t>2
44.93
100.90
PAGE 4
-------
TOWN OF LOWELL
TREATMENT INFORMATION
> TREATKENT PROCESSES » * yATER TREATED « TREATMENT CHEMICALS
AERATION 100.* CHLORINE
FI LTRAT10N ICO . *
CHLOR1NATIDN 100.*
10-YEAR CHEMICAL COST ANALYSIS
* 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971
TUTAL COST 6000. 6000. 6767. 6105. 6558. 5379.
TREATED HATER 109. 120. 130. 139. 147. 180.
BILLED M& 92. 84. 93. 97. 112. 11*.
»/MG TREATED 55. 50. 52. 44. 45. 30.
t/MG BILLED 65. 71. 73. 63. 58. 47.
5-2-001
6/21/76
L8/M& TREATED
211.8
1972 1973 1974 1975*
5000. 3185. 5060. 6954.
191. 237. 238. 264.
126. 147. 155. 152.
26. 13. 21. 26.
40. 22. 33. 46.
PAGE
-------
CONSTITUENT
ARSENIC
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
LEAD
NITRATE IN)
SILVER
FLUORIDE
CHLORIDE
IRON
MANGANESE
SULPHATE
LlHC
TOKN OF LOWELL
RAH/TREATED MATER OUALITY INFORMATION
(UNITS ARE THE SAME AS SHCWN ON PAGE ABOVE)
RAW
MIN. MAX.
02/12/75 »
TEST
TREATED
MIN. HAX.
<.02
69
0.3
47
.05
12/01/75
TEST
.02
.5
3.8
96
0.1
<.02
51
5-2-901
6/21/76
PAGE S
-------
5-2-001
6/21/76
TOMN OF LOWELL
10-YE4R LABOR COST ANALYSIS
1968
1970
1971
1972
1974
1975
PAYROLL 1
MAN HOURS
MC BILLED CONSUMPTION
i/HG
MH/MG
13774. 14000. 21195. 21452. 22080. 27293. 32000. 42940. (.3255.
8".. 93. 97. 112.
167. 228. 222. 196.
1 1 < . 126.
240. 253.
291.
278. 294.
PAGE 10
-------
5-Z-001
6/21/76
TOWN OF LOWELL
10-YEAR POKER COST ANALYSIS
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
POKER $
K W H
l/HG
K U H/MG
3413. 4000. 4393. 6550. 7405. 6811.
157188. 242073. 292237. 317386. 387600.
37. 48. 47. 68. 66. 60.
1701. 2603. 3019. 2824. 3403.
9000. 10568.
00000. 473674.
71. 72.
3167. 3214.
9347. 13796.
490360. 561123.
60. 91.
3153. 3699.
PACE 12
-------
TUMN QF LOWELL
10-YEAR DEPRECIATION ALLOCATION
1966 1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
5-2-001
6/21/76
1974 1975 *
DEPRECIATION COST S
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
210. 220.
735. 770.
1890. 1980.
7665. 8030.
10500. 11000.
228.
798.
2052.
8322.
11400.
368.
1288.
3312.
13432.
18400.
DEPRECIATION COST
SUPPORT SERVICES
h-1
CO ACQUISITION
O
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
2. 3.
8. 9.
20. 24.
83. 96.
114. 131.
2.
9.
22.
89.
123.
4.
13.
34.
139.
190.
DEPRECIATION COST *
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
2.00 2.00
7.00 7.00
18.00 18.00
73.00 73.00
100.00 100.00
2.00
7.00
18.00
73.00
100.00
2.00
7.00
18.00
73.00
100.00
INTEREST COST
INTEREST i
INTEREST S/MC
7260. 70400.
79. 838.
6800.
73.
21059.
218.
388.
1358.
3492.
14162.
19400.
t/MG
3.
12.
31.
126.
173.
OF TOTAL
2.00
7.00
18.00
73.00
100.00
1
23623.
210.
408.
1428.
3672.
14892.
20400.
4.
13.
32.
131.
179.
2.00
7.00
18.00
73.00
100.00
23199.
204.
428.
1498.
3852.
15622.
21400.
3.
12.
30.
124.
169.
2.00
7.00
18.00
73.00
100.00
22716.
180.
448.
1S68.
4032.
16352.
22400.
3.
11.
27.
111.
152.
2.00
7.00
18.00
73.00
100.00
22204.
151.
468. 492.
1640. 1723.
4216. 442'i.
17099. 17942.
23423. 24578.
3. 3.
11. 11.
27. 29.
110. 118.
151. 162.
2.00 2.30
7.00 7.00
16.00 18.00
73.00 73.00
100.00 100.00
21692. 21160.
139. 139.
PASE 14
-------
00
TOTAL
»/MG
»/HG 1975 DOLLARS
SPECIAL TAXES
0 I M * OF TOTAL
5-2-001
6/21/75
TOWN OF LOWELL
10-YEAR CAPITAL AND OPERATING COST ANALYSIS
» 1966
0 I H 3558*.
DEPRECIATION 10500.
INTEREST 7260.
1967
40000.
11000.
70<>00.
1968
46640.
11400.
6800.
1969
48057.
18400.
21059.
1970
59966.
19400.
23623.
1971
71737.
20400.
23199.
1972
90038.
21400.
22716.
1973
102464.
22400.
22204.
1974
92487.
23423.
21692.
1975
140952.
2457S.
21160.
53344. 121400. 64840. 87516. 102989. 115336. 134154. 147068. 137602. 186691.
577. 1445. 697. 904. 916. 1013. 1062. 998. 885. 1231.
958. 2327. 1081. 1329. 1274. 1347. 1370. 1207. 965. 1231.
0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 3.
66.71 32.95 71.93 54.91 58.23 62.20 67.12 69.67 67.21 75.50
PACE 16
-------
5-2-001
6/21/76
TOWN OF LOWELL
COST SUMMARY FDR 1975
SUPPORT SERVICES* ACQUISITION » TREATMENT » DISTRIBUTION INTEREST TOTAL * TAXES TOTAL M/TAX
»/NG
X OF TOTAL
X OF TUTAL
N/TAX
23.14
152.
12.36
12.36
9.63
536.
43.53
43.53
139.
11.33
11.33
1231.
100.00
100.00
0.
1231 .
100.00
00
N3
IN SUMMARY!
DURING THE PAST 10 YEARS, » 1497395. TOTAL COST IN 1975 OOLLARS PRODUCED
1173. MG WATER FOR AN AVERAGE COST OF 1 1276./ MG (1975 DOLLARS)
PACE It
-------
U. S. ENVIRONMENTS!. PROTECTION AtENCY
HATER SUPPLY COST STUDY
EPA CONTRACT 68-03-2071
FOR
CITY OF LEBANON
5-5-002
6/15/76
00
U)
EPA PROJECT OFFICER
ROBERT CLARK
WATER SUPPLY RESEARCH 01V.
MUNICIPAL ENVIRONMENTAL
RESEARCH LABORATORY
26 WEST ST.CLAIR STREET
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45260
TELEPHONE! (5131 684-7209
ACT SYSTEMS PROGRAM MANAGER
WILLIAM KYLE ADA1S
SUITE 230
807 WEST MORSE BLVD.
WINTER PARK. FLORIDA 32789
TELEPHONE: oosi 6*4-3900
UTILITY REPRESENTATIVE
MR. CHARLES GUARD
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF LEBANON
CITY BUILDING
LEBANON. OHIO 45036
(513) 932-30*0
EPA REGIONAL REPRESENTATIVE
MR. F. DONALD NADDOX
U. S. EPA
230 S. DEARBORNS
CHICAGO. ILLINOIS 60604
(3121 353-7736
-------
5-5-002
6/15/76
00
CITY OF LEBANON
SYSTEM FACTS
1975
POPULATION - SMSA
COUNTY
CITY OR TOWN
RETAIL SERVICE AREA
AREA OF RETAIL SERVICE AREA
NUMBER OF METERS
NUMBER Of ACCOUNTS
NUMBER OF FLAT RATE ACCOUNTS
PURCHASED WATER - RAH
TREATED
SOURCE HATER - GROUND
SURFACE
PIPE IN SYSTEM
ELEVATIONS - INTAKES
TREATMENT PLANTS
SERVICE AREA MIN.
SERVICE AREA MAX.
REVENUE PRODUCING MATER
TREATED WATER
MAX. DAY
MAX. HOUR
FISCAL YEAR
IMPLEMENTATION DATE
PROCESSING DATE
90000
10000
10050.
6.70 SO Mi
2 (.65.
2466.
0.
0 MG
0 MG
100.0 X
0.0 *
33 MI
690 FT
670 FT
965 FT
245.7800 MG
429.0000 MG
60 MG
12/31
6/15/76
7/26/76
PAKE
-------
00
CITY OF LEBANON
10-YEAR KEY OEM COST ANALYSIS
1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973
COST/YEAR
SUPPORT SERVICES 14318. 14304. 23736. 20732. 28666. 28594. 28S18. 313*8.
ACOUISITION 4937. 8052. 8562. 10083. 11974. 11638. 12199. 19591.
TREATMENT 5578. 8753. 9217. 10879. 13311. 12542. 13014. 20463.
DISTRIBUTION 26656. 25683. 25475. 30208. 45870. 43867. 51231. 61490.
TOTAL 51490. 56792. 66990. 71902. 99821. 96640. 104962. 132891.
COST/HG
SUPPORT SERVICES 48. 43. 65. 49. 82. 66. 83. 94.
ACQUISITION 16. 24. 24. 24. 34. 27. 35. 59.
TREATMENT 19. 26. 25. 25. 38. 29. 38. 61.
DISTRIBUTION 89. 77. 70. 71. 130. 101. 149. 184.
TOTAL 172. 171. 185. 168. 284. 222. 305. 398.
X OF TOTAL
SUPPORT SERVICES 27.81 25.19 35.43 26.83 28.72 29.59 27.17 23.59
ACOUISITION 9.59 14.18 12.78 14.02 12.00 12.04 11.62 14.74
TREATMENT 10.83 15.41 13.76 15.13 13.34 12.98 12.40 15.40
DISTRIBUTION 51.77 45.22 38.03 42.01 45.95 45.39 48.81 46.27
TOTAL 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
5-5-002
6/15/76
197-. 1975 «
32315. 37077.
19344. 25773.
20152. 26581.
67387- 71463.
139198. 160887.
117. 151.
70. 105.
73. 108.
244. 291.
503. 65$.
23.22 23.05
13.90 16.32
14.48 16.52
48.41 44.42
100.00 100.00
PACE 4
-------
CITY OF LEBANON
TREATMENT INFORMATION
s-s-002
6/15/76
TREATMENT PROCESSES
AERATION
FILTRATION
CHLDRINAT10N
« < NATER TREATED TREATMENT CHEMICALS LB/MC TREATED
100. t CHLORINE 8-5
100.*
100. t
10-YEAR CHEMICAL COST ANALYSIS
1967 1968 1969 1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
00
cr.
TnTAL COST
TREATED WATER
BILLED MC
1/MG TREATED
t/HG BILLED
344.
Z99.
390.
332.
425.
363.
454.
427.
464.
352.
544.
436.
536.
345.
433.
334.
555.
387.
277.
1.
2.
995.
429.
246.
2.
4.
PACE
-------
5-5-00.2
6/I5/T4
CITY DF LEBANON
RAN/TREATED MATER OUALITV INFORMATION
(UNITS ARE THE SAME AS SHOWN ON PAGE ABOVE)
» CONSTITUENT
ft
BARIUM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
LEAD
NITRATE INI
SILVER
FLUORIDE
TURBIDITY
COLOR
CHLORIDE
COPPER
FOAMING AGENTS
IRON
MANGANESE
SULPHATE
il NC
GROSS BETA
GROSS ALPHA
RAW 12/12/7* TREATED
M1N. MAX. TEST * HIM. MAX.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.09
0.
0.32
9.4
1 .
43.
0.
0.0
2.0
0.13
92.
0.
12/12/7* «
TEST
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.19
D.
0.28
0.*
1.
*0.
0
0.0
0.11
0.
9*.
0.
0.
0.
PAGE
-------
00
00
PAYROLL 1
MAN HOURS
M& BILLED CONSUMPTION
HH/MC
5-5-002
6/15/76
CITY CF LEBANON
10-YEAR LABOR COST ANALYSIS
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
26677. 30576. 34942. 40697. 50302. 55876. 63200. 67769. 73372. 79309.
19760. 19760. 19760. 21840. 21840. 21840. 23920. 28080. 26000. 23920.
299. 332. 363. 427. 352. 436. 345. 334. 277. 246.
89. 92. 96. 95. 143. 128. 183. 203. 265. 323.
66. 60. 5
-------
5-5-OOZ
6/15/76
CITY OF LEBANON
10-YEAR POWER COST ANALYSIS
1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971
1972
1973
197*
1975
POKER $
K W H
t/MG
* M H/MG
12805. 14034. 13115. 15938. 26742. 18080.
743109. 844302. 872622. 1011622. 1982123. 1025990.
43. 42. 36. 37. 76. <>1.
2482. 2545. 2405. 2369. 5637. 2355.
16296. 17414.
981578. 934798.
47. 52.
2848. 2797.
16161. 16222.
867541. 670803.
58. 66.
3137. 3543.
£
VO
PACE 12
-------
5-5-002
6/15/76
CITY OF LEBANON
10-YEAR DEPRECIATION ALLOCATION
1966 1967 1968 1969
1970 1971 1972 1973 197-. 1975
DEPRECIATION COST »
SUPPORT SERVICES 5190. 5235. 5282. 5319.
ACQUISITION 8304. 8376. 8451. 8510.
TREATMENT 2076. 2094. 2113. 2127.
DISTRIBUTION 88230. 88995. 89790. 90417.
TOTAL 103800. 104700. 105635. 106373.
DEPRECIATION COST
SUPPORT SERVICES 17. 16. 15. 12.
ACQUISITION 28. 25. 23. 20.
TREATMENT 7. 6. 6. 5.
DISTRIBUTION 295. 268. 248. 212.
TUTAL 347. 316. 291. 249.
DEPRECIATION COST *
SUPPORT SERVICES 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
ACQUISITION 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00
TREATMENT 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
DISTRIBUTION 85.00 85.00 85.00 85.00
TOTAL 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
INTEREST COST
INTEREST » 7812. 6674. 6237. 5800.
INTEREST »/MG 26. 20. 17. 14.
5354. 5380. 5407. 5436. 5456. 5503.
8566. 8608. 8651. 8697. 8730. 8603.
2141. 2152. 2163. 2174. 2183. 2203.
91011. 91460. 91921. 92406. 92757. 93500.
107072. 107600. 108142. 108713. 109126. 110000.
i/HC
15. 12. 16. 16. 20. 22.
24. 20. 25. 26. 32. 36.
6. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9.
259. 210. 267. 276. 335. 380.
304. 247. 314. 325. 395. 449.
OF TOTAL
5.00 5.00 5.00 S.OO S.OO 5.00
8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00
2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.30
85.00 85.00 65.00 85.00 85.00 85.00
100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.30
$
11350. 2S725. 2212k. 43712. 30312. 28S03.
32. 66. 64. 131. 110. lli.
PACE
-------
TOTAL
»/MG
»/HC 1975 DOLLARS
SPECIAL TAXES
0 I N » OF TOTAL
5-5-002
6/15/76
CITY OF LEBANON
10-YEAR CAPITAL AND OPERATING COST ANALYSIS
1966
OIK 51490.
OEPRECIATIuN 103800.
INTEREST 7812.
1967
56792.
104700.
6674.
1968
66990.
105635.
6237.
1969
71902.
106373.
5800.
1970 1971
99821. 96i>!
107072. 107600.
11350. 28725.
1972
104962.
108142.
22126.
1973
132891.
108713.
4371Z.
1974
139198.
109126.
30312.
1975
160887.
110000.
2850).
163102. 168166. 178862. 184075. 218243. 232965. 235230. 235316. 278637. 299387.
545. 507. 493. 431. 621. 535. 683. 854. 1008. 1218.
904. 816. 764. 634. 863. 711. 881. 1033. 1098. 1219.
0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
31.57 33.77 37.45 39.06 45.74 41.48 44.62 46.58 49.96 53.74
PACE 16
-------
5-5-002
6/15/76
CITY DF LEBANON
COST SUMMARY FOR 1975
'SUPPORT SERVICES' ACQUISITION TREATMENT » DISTRIBUTION INTEREST TOTAL TAXES TOTAL W/TAX «
S/M& 173. 141. 117. 671. 116. 1218. 0. 1218.
* OF TOTAL 14.22 11.55 9.61 55.10 9.52 100.00
* OF TOTAL 14.22 11.55 9.61 55.10 9.52 100.00 0.00 100.00
N/TAX
IN SUMMARY!
DURING THE PAST 10 YEARS. » 2954304. TOTAL COST IN 1975 DOLLARS PRODUCED
3409. MC MATER FOR AN AVERAGE COST OF t 867./ MG 11975 DOLLARS)
PACE It
-------
U. 5. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WATER SUPPLY COST STUDY
EPA CONTRACT 68-03-2071
FOR
VILLAGE OF BATAVIA
5-5-004
6/17/76
VO
OJ
EPA PROJECT OFFICER
ROBERT CLARK
WATER SUPPLY RESEARCH OIV.
MUNICIPAL ENVIRONMENTAL
RESEARCH LABORATORY
26 WEST ST.CLAIS STREET
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45260
TELEPHONE! (513) 684-7209
ACT Sf-STEMS PROGRAM MANAGER
WILLIAM KYLE ADAMS
SUITE-200
607 WEST MORSE BLVD.
WINTER PARK. FLORIDA 327B9
TELEPHONE: nos) 6*4-3900
UTILITY REPRESENTATIVE
MR. DON UINEMILLER
SUPERINTENDENT
BATAVIA WATERWORKS
389 MAIN STREET
BATAVIA. OHIO 45103
(513) 732-2020
E F A REGIONAL REPRESENTATIVE
MR. f . DONALD MAODOX
U. S. EPA
230 S. DEARBDRNE
CHICAGO. ILLINOIS 60604
(312) 353-7736
-------
5-5-00*
6/17/76
VILLAGE OF BATAVIA
SYSTEM PACTS
1975
POPULATION - SMSA
COUNTY
CITY OR TOHN
RETAIL SERVICE AREA
AREA OF RETAIL SERVICE AREA
NUMBER OF METERS
NUMBER OF ACCOUNTS
NUMBER OF FLAT RATE ACCOUNTS
PURCHASED MATER - RAM
TREATED
SOURCE MATER - GROUND
SURFACE
PIPE IN SYSTEM
ELEVATIONS - INTAKES
TREATMENT PLANTS
SERVICE AREA MIN.
SERVICE AREA MAX.
REVENUE PRODUCING HATER
TREATED HATER
MAX. DAY
MAX. HOUR
FISCAL YEAR
IMPLEMENTATION DATE
PROCESSING OATE
95725
2100
2100.
2.10 SO MI
bOO.
600.
0.
0 MG
0 MG
0.0 *
100.0 *
10 MI
<.6.9800 MG
58.0140 MG
.2*0 MG
.520 MG
12/31
6/17/7S
7/26/76
PAGE 2
-------
t_n
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
5-5-00*
6/17/7*
VILLAGE OF BATAVIA
10-YEAR KEY OEM COST ANALYSIS
1966
1967 19*8 1969 1970 1971
COST/YEAR
1972
1973
197*
33679. 3*766.
37868.
36690.
COST/MG
705. 717.
780.
760.
6761.
2*15.
627B.
328*1.
*B296.
136.
48.
126.
660.
970.
1975
6126.
3188.
5688.
29753.
»3755.
130.
*7.
121.
633.
931.
X OF TOTAL
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACOUISIT1JN
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
14.00
S.OO
13.00
68.00
100.00
14.00
5.DO
13.00
68.30
100.90
PAGE
-------
VILLAGE OF BATAVIA
TREATMENT INFORMATION
5-5-00*
6/17/76
TREATMENT PROCESSES
SEDIMENTATION
FILTRATION
CHLOR1NATION
« * HATER TREATED
100. *
100. *
100. *
TREATMENT CHEMICALS
CHLORINE
CARBON
LIME
ALUM
C02
LB/MG TREATED
37.6
0.8
1532. B
375.0
49.1
10-YEAR CHEMICAL COST ANALYSIS
VD
TUTAL COST
TREATED HATER
BILLED MG
$/MG TREATED
t/MG BILLED
1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973
2715.
62. 66. 68. 63. 59. 60. 60. 60.
SO. 61. 55. 51. 48. 48 . 49. 48.
46.
56.
1974
3987.
61.
50.
65.
80.
1975*
__
S3.
47.
--
__
PAGE
-------
5-5-00*
6/17/76
VILLAGE OF 6ATAVIA
RAH/TREATED HATER QUALITY INFORMATION
(UNITS ARE THE SAME AS SHOWN ON PAGE ABOVE)
*»»»*»»»»»*«>**»*»*»»****»»»**»»»»»***»*»***»*»»»»»*»»»***»**»»«»»»
CONSTITUENT « RAM / / TREATED / /
* MIN. MAX. TEST MIN. MAX. TEST *
PAGE a
-------
VILLAGE OF BATAV1A
10-YEAR LABOR COST ANALYSIS
5-5-004
6/17/76
1967
1»69
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1»75
PAYROLL I
MAN HOURS
HC BILLED CONSUMPTION
»/MO
MH/MG
V/HH
6240.
50.
124.
6240.
102.
6240.
6240.
51.
6240.
48.
114.
16413.
4160.
48.
339.
86.
3.95
4160.
18551.
4160.
48.
184.
86.
4.46
17509.
4160.
50.
352.
84.
4.21
4160.
47.
89.
00
PAGE 10
-------
5-J-OO*
6/17/76
VILLAGE OF BATAVIA
10-YEAR POKER COST ANALYSIS
»*****»***»******»**#******»»*********»******»*»*#**»****»***»»*»»*»»*»**
* 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 *
«»»*»»»*»***»*»»»*»*»*»*«»»*»****»»**»»*»»*»»»»**»**»*»*»»»»*»*»»*»*****»*«****»*»»*»*»
POWER i -- ~ -- -- *91*. «952.
K H H
»/MC -- « -- -- 102. »9.
K H H/NG
VO
VO
PAGE 12
-------
5-5-004
6/17/76
VILLAGE OF BATAV1A
10-YEAR DEPRECIATION ALLOCATION
1966
1967
1968 1969 1970
DEPRECIATION COST »
1971
1972
1973
1975
O
o
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
INTEREST t
INTEREST t/MG
--
--
--
--
--
DEPRECIATION COST
__
--
--
-_
--
DEPRECIATION COST *
-- ._
--
--
INTEREST COST
..
--
120.
1380.
300.
4200.
6000.
t/MG
3.
29.
6.
88.
126.
OF TOTAL
2.00
23.00
5.00
70.00
100.00
1
14750.
309.
121.
1387.
301.
4220.
6029.
2.
29.
6.
67.
124.
2.00
23.00
5.00
70.00
100.00
14600.
301.
127.
1455.
31t>.
442B.
6326.
3.
30.
7.
91.
130.
2.00
23.00
5.00
70.00
100.00
14450.
298.
127.
1458.
317.
4438.
6340.
3.
30.
7.
92.
131.
2.00
23.00
5.00
70.00
100.00
14300.
296.
128.
1471.
320.
4476.
6395.
3.
30.
6 .
90.
128.
2.00
23.00
5.00
70.00
100.00
14150.
284.
128.
1476.
321.
4491.
641S.
3.
31.
7.
96.
137.
2. DO
23.10
5.00
70.00
100.00
14003.
299.
PAGE 14
-------
TOTAL
*/MG
S/HG 1975 DOLLARS
SPECIAL TAXES
0 t M * OF TOTAL
5-5-00*
6/17/76
VILLAGE OF BATAVIA
10-YEAR CAPITAL AND OPERATING COST ANALYSIS
* 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970
0 t M -.-.-. 33679.
DEPRECIATION -- -- 6000.
INTEREST -- -- -- 14750.
1971
34766.
6029.
14600.
1972
37868.
6326.
14450.
1973
36690.
6340.
14300.
1974
48296.
6395.
14150.
1975
43755.
6415.
14000.
54429.
1139.
1SS3.
0.
61.88
55395.
1143.
1520.
0.
62.76
58644.
12C1.
1559.
0.
64.57
57330.
1188.
1437.
0.
64.00
68841.
1383.
1507.
0.
70.16
64173.
1366.
1366.
0.
68.19
PACE 16
-------
5-5-00*
4/17/76
VILLAGE OF BATAV1A
COST SUMMARY FOR 1975
» 'SUPPORT SERVICES* ACOUISITION « TREATMENT DISTRIBUTION INTEREST TOTAL TAXES TOTAL N/TAX
»/MG 133. 78. 128. 739. 298. 136*. 0. 1366.
> OF TOTAL 9.75 5.71 9.36 53.36 21.82 100.00
X OF TOTAL 9.75 5.71 9.36 53.36 21.82 100.00 0.00 100.00
M/TAX
N3
O
IN SUMMARY:
DURING THE PAST 6 YEARS, $ <»33557. TOTAL COST IN 1975 DOLLARS PRODUCED
290. MG WATER FOR AN AVERAGE COST OF S 1<.96./ MG (1975 DOLLARS)
PAGE 18
-------
APPENDIX C
This Appendix contains small water utilities printouts for Region VI
water systems. If explanantion of a data element is required, refer to
Appendix A.
U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
HATER SUPPLY COST STUDY
EPA CONTRACT 68-03-2071
FOR
CITY OF BELTON
6-5-001
5/10/76
EPA PROJECT OFFICER
ROBERT CLARK
HATER SUPPLY RESEARCH DIV.
MUNICIPAL ENVIRONMENTAL
RESEARCH LABORATORY
26 NEST ST.CLAIR STREET
CINCINNATI. OHIO 45260
TELEPHONE! (513) 684-7209
ACT SYSTEMS PROGRAM MANAGER
WILLIAh KYLE ADAMS
SUITE 200
B07 WEST MORSE BLVD.
WINTER PARK. FLORIDA 32789
TELEPHONE: (305) 644-3900
UTILITY REPRESENTATIVE
MR. R. K. UTLEY
CITY OF BELTON
P 0 BOX 120
BELTON. TEXAS 76513
817-939-2611
STATE REPRESENTATIVE
MR. STEVE P. ELLISON
DOMESTIC WATER SUPPLY PROGRAM
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING
TEXAS OEPT. HEALTH RESOURCES
1100 W. 49TH ST.
AUSTIN. TEXAS 78756
EPA REGIONAL REPRESENTATIVE
MR. CHARLES SEVER
WATER SUPPLY OFFICE
US. EPA
SUITE 1100
1600 PATTERSON
DALLAS. TEXAS 75201
214-749-1962
203
-------
6-5-001
5/10/76
NJ
o
CITY OF BELTON
SYSTEM FACTS
1975
POPULATION - SMSA
COUNTY
CITY OR TtJuN
RETAIL SERV ICE AREA
AREA OF RETAIL SERVICE AREA
NUMBER OF METERS
NUMBER OF ACCOUNTS
NUMBER OF FLAT RATE ACCOUNTS
PURCHASED WATER - RAH
TREATED
SOURCE HATER - GROUND
SURFACE
PIPE IN SYSTEM
ELEVATIONS - INTAKES
TREATMENT PLANTS
SERVICE AREA NIN.
SERVICE AREA MAX.
REVENUE PRODUCING HATER
TREATED HATER
MAX. DAY
MAX. HOUR
FISCAL YEAR
IMPLEMENTATION DATE
PROCESSING DATE
220757
172757
9800
10653.
6.88 50 MI
3289.
3329.
<.0.
0 MG
427.885 MG
0.0 \
100.0 t
700 FT
NONt
500 FT
650 FT
357.6910 MG
427.3850 MG
5/31
5/10/76
6/ 1/76
PAGE
-------
CITY DF BELTON
10-YEAR KEY 0 t H C3ST ANALYSIS
6-5-001
5/10/76
1967
1970
1971
1972
1973
1975
K>
O
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACUUISITIQN
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISIT13M
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
CGST/YEAR
24947.
32493.
769.
44292.
102501.
23173.
79997.
546.
87198.
190913.
24614.
98753.
56.
146456.
259885.
25579.
107456.
12.
62211.
215258.
34338.
106684.
334.
79149.
22050S.
31979
113327
463
113327
259096
COST/KG
91 .
119.
3.
162.
375.
t OF TOTAL
24.34
31.70
0.75
43.21
100.00
76.
263.
2.
287.
627.
12.14
41.90
0.29
45.67
100.00
85.
341.
0.
506.
933.
9.12
36.59
J.02
54.27
100.00
84.
351.
Cr.
268.
703.
11.38
49.92
0.01
38.19
100.00
115.
357.
1 .
265.
737.
li.57
48.38
0.15
35.89
100.00
89.
317.
i .
317.
12.34
43.74
0.18
43.74
100.00
PAGE
-------
CITY OF HELTON
TREATMENT INFORMATION
6-5-001
5/10/76
TREATMENT PROCESSES
kATER TREATED «
» TREATMENT CHEMICALS
CHLORINE
10-VEAK CHEMICAL COST ANALYSIS
LB/HC TREATED
15.9
CHLORINATION
TJTA,
Tflc AT
Bl LLE
»/MC
i/MG
COiT
rO MATER
D MG
TREATED
BILLED
1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 U71 197c
769. 5",S. 56.
--
273. 304. 2o9.
3. 2. 0.
1973
12.
--
306.
--
D.
197*
334.
--
299.
--
1.
1 J75»
463.
<>2S.
353.
1 .
1 .
PAiE 6
-------
6-5-001
5/10/76
CITY OF RELTON
RAH/TREATED HATER QUALITY INFORMATION
(UNITS ARE THE SAME AS iHOWN ON PAfcE ABOVE)
CONSTITUENT » RAW / / TREATED 02/11/75
« MIN. MAX. TEST « MIN. MAX. TEiT
SELENIUM 2.2
FLUORIDE 0.70
CHLORIDE 28.0
SULPHATE 23.0
NJ
O
PAGE
-------
CITY DF BELTON
10-YEAR LABOR COST ANALYSIS
6-5-001
5/10/76.
1967
I960
1969
1970
1971
1973
197*.
1975
NJ
o
00
PAYRuLL »
HAN HOURS
MG BILLED CONSUMPTION
»/MC
HH/MG
<.8775. 38951. 3187;.
20362. 208i2.
273.
179.
76.
2.3<.
30<..
J89.
110.
72.
1 .53
".1895.
20862.
306.
137.
68.
450S".. 51124.
20862. 20862.
299. 353.
151. 1<.3.
70.
58.
2.16
-------
CITY OF BELTON
10-YEAR POWER COST ANALYSIS
6-5-001
5/10/76
1966
1967
1968
1970
1971
1972
1973
197*
1975
POWER I
K W H/MC
N5
O
PAGE
-------
.
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTA^
INTEREST I
INTEREST l/MG
CITY OF 6ELTON
10-YEAR DEPRECIATION ALLOCATION
1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971
DEPRECIATION COST »
737. 737.
0. 0.
0. 0.
6633. 6633.
7370. 7370.
DEPRECIATION COST »/HG
3. 2.
0. 0.
0. 0.
24. 22.
27. 24.
DEPRECIATION COST X OF TOTAL
10.00 10.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
90.00 90.00
100.00 100.00
INTEREST COST i
13515. 13207.
49. 43.
6-5-001
5/10/76
1972 1973 1974 1975
737. 737. 737. 737.
0. 0. 0. 0.
0. 0. 0. 0.
6633. 6633. 6633. 6633.
7370. 7370. 7370. 7370.
3. 2. 2. 2.
0. 0. 0. 0.
0. 0. 0. a.
23. 22. 22. 19.
25. 24. 25. 21.
10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 O.DO
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30
90.00 90.00 90.00 90.30
100.00 100.00 100.00 100. DO
12900. 12575. 12232. 11B9D.
45. 41. 41. 33.
PAGE 14
-------
ro
TOTAL
»/MG
i/MG 1975 DOLLARS
SPECIAL TAXES
0 I H » OF TUTAL
6-5-001
5/10/76
CITY OF 6ELTON
10-YEAR CAPITAL AND OPERATING COST ANALYSIS
1966 1967 1968 1969 1970
0 t M ------ 102501.
DEPRECIATION -- -- -- -- 7370.
INTEREST -- -- -- 13515.
1971
190913.
7370.
13207.
1972
269885.
7370.
12900.
1973
215258.
7370.
12575.
197»
220505.
7370.
12232.
1975
25909S.
7i7D.
11893.
123386. 211491. 290155. 235203. 240108. 27B35D.
452. 695. 1003. 768. 803. 77i.
628. 92(>. 1294. 929. 875. 778.
0. 0. 0. 0. U. 3.
83.07 90.27 93.01 91.52 91.84 93.38
PAGE 16
-------
6-5-001
5/10/76,
CITY OF BELTON
COST SUMMARY FDR 1975
"SUPPORT SERVICES" ACQUISITION TREATMENT » OISTRIBUTION « INTEREST « TOTAL
TAXES » TOTAL H/TAX *
Of TUTAL
OF TUTAL
h/TAX
91 .
11.75
11.75
317.
1.0.71
40.71
335.
-------
U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
MATER SUPPLY COST STUDY
EPA CONTRACT 68-03-2071
FDR
CITY OF GEORGETOWN
6-5-002
5/11/76
Ni
M
U>
EPA PROJECT OFFICER
ROBERT CLARK
WATER SUPPLY RESEARCH DIV.
MUNICIPAL ENVIRONMENTAL
RESEARCH LABORATORY
26 JEST ST.CLAIR STREET
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45260
TELEPHONE: (5131 684-7209
ACT SYSTEMS PROGRAM MANAGER
WILLIAM KYLE ADAMS
SUITE 200
807 WEST MORSE BLVD.
WINTER PARK, FLORIDA 32789
TELEPHONE: (305) 644-3900
UTILITY REPRESENTATIVE
MR. RcX WQOTAN
CITY UF GEORGETOWN
PO BOX 409
GEORGETOWN. TEXAS 78626
517-863-2113
STATE REPRESENTATIVE
MR. STEVE P. ELLISON
DOMESTIC MATER SUPPLY PROGRAM
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERINP
TEXAS DEPT HEALTH RESOURCES
1100 *. 49TH ST.
AUSTIN.TEXAS 78756
EPA REGIONAL REPRESENTATIVE
U. CHARLES SEVER
WATER- SUPPLY OFFICE
US EPA
SUITE 1100
1630 PATTERS3Y
DALLAS. TEXAS 75231
214-749-1962
-------
6-5-002
CITY OF GEORGETOWN
SYSTEH FACTS
1975
POPULATION - SMSA
COUNTY
CITY OR TOWN
RETAIL SERVICE AREA
AREA OF RETAIL SERVICE AREA
NUMBER OF METERS
NUMBER OF ACCOUNTS
NUMBER OF FLAT RATE ACCOUNTS
PURCHASED WATER - RAH
TREATED
SOURCE MATER - GROUND
SURFACE
PIPE IN SYSTEM
ELEVATIONS - INTAKES
TREATMENT PLANTS
SERVICE AREA MIN.
SERVICE AREA MAX.
REVENUE PRODUCING WATER
TREATED MATER
MAX. DAY
MAX. HOUR
FISCAL YEAR
IMPLEMENTATION DATE
PROCESSING DATE
N.A.
<,«.000
8300
10000.
6.02 SO MI
2629.
2829.
0.
0 *G
0 HG
100.0 *
0.0 t
<.2 MI
7*0 FT
680 FT
800 FT
313.5680 NO
589.7970 MG
3.74 MG
H.A.
8/31
5/11/76
6/ 1/76
PACE
-------
CITY OF GEORGETOWN
10-YEAR KEY OEM COST ANALYSIS
6-5-002
5/11/76
1966
1967 1966 1969 1970 1971
COST/YEAR
1972
1973
1975
SUPPURT SERVICES
ACuUlSlTlON
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
13723.
3009.
2437.
54758.
73896.
16412.
2250.
1800.
40949.
61411.
18673.
2772.
2217.
50444.
74106.
1950S.
2772.
2217.
so*:.;..
74942.
28534.
3752.
3002.
68295.
1035B4.
27316
4295
3436
78165
113212
31274. 36993.
4105. 4377.
3284. 3501.
74717. 79655.
113381. 124531.
CDST/MG
Ul
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
OISTR1BUTIUN
TOTAL
SUPPuRT iErtVKES
ACJUIS1TION
TREATMENT
OISTRlDUTlliN
TOTAL
* OF TOTAL
42.
6.
5.
109.
162.
78.
10.
t>.
187.
283.
7}.
12.
10.
226.
327.
83.
11.
9.
199.
302.
119
1*
11
25*
397
13
'+
3
74
100
.57
.07
.26
.10
.00
26
3
2
66
100
.73
.66
.93
.68
.1)0
25
3
2
68
100
.20
.74
.99
.07
.00
26
3
2
67
100
.03
.70
.96
.31
.30
27
3
2
65
100
.55
.62
.90
.93
.00
24
3
3
69
100
.13
.79
.03
.04
.00
27.
3.
2.
65.
100.
58
62
90
90
00
29.71
3.51
2.31
63.96
100.30
PAGE
-------
CITY OF GEORGETOWN
TREATMENT INFQRNAT1 ON
5/11/7t>
TRLATMENT PROCESSES
CrlLGiUNATIuM
* »4TEk TREATED
1 C 0 . >.
CHEMICALS
LB/H& TREATED
10-VEA* CHEMICAL COST ANALYSIS
ivfcv 197J
1972
197
-------
t-5-002
5/11/76
CITY OF GEORGETOWN
RAW/TREATED WATER OUALITY INFORMATION
(UNITS ARE THE SAME AS SHOtiN ON PAGE ASDVE)
CONSTITUENT * RAH / / « TRtATED 12/29/75
« WIN. MAX. TEST » HIM. MAX. TEST
NITRATE (Nl 27.D
FLUOklJE 0.2
1RCN 0.02
MANGANESE <0.05
SULPrtATE 19.0
PAGE 8
-------
CITY OF &EDROETO.N
10-YEAR LABOR COST ANALYSIS
6-5-003
5/11/76
1969
197J
1975
PAYROLL
MAN n3URS
M5 B 1 .-LEJ LONSUMPT ION
V/M&
MH /MG
3S501.
2.05
1 6 t'-. G . 1 6 b '» 3 .
53.
PAGE 10
-------
6-5-002
s/iim
CITY Of GEORGETOWN
10-YEAR POWER COST ANALYSIS
1966
1967 1968 1969 1970
1971
1972
1973
197*
1975
POWER I
K M rl
i/MG
K k rt/MG
982. 15*D.
143B371. 835691.
3. i.
3836. 2665.
VO
PAGE 12
-------
S3
M
o
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
INTEREST »
INTEREST i/MG
6-S-002
s/n/76
CITY OF GEORGETOWN
10-YEAR DEPRECIATION ALLOCATION
1966
19*7
1968 1969 1970
DEPRECIATION COST >
1971
1972
1973
1974
INTEREST COST 1
6100.
5994.
12090.
18137.
39.
18000.
49.
1744B.
50.
16897.
45.
197S
1700.
850.
680.
13770.
17000.
1704.
852.
681 .
13800.
17037.
DEPRECIATION COST
1580.
790.
632.
12799.
15801.
l/HG
1460.
730.
584.
11826.
14600.
1340.
670.
536.
10854.
13400.
1361.
681 .
544.
11025.
13611.
1380.
690.
552.
11178.
13800.
1403.
700
563
11341
14001
--
--
--
--
DEPRECIATION COST
10.00
5.00
4.00
81.00
100.00
10.00
5.00
».oo
81.00
100.00
--
--
* OF TUTAL
10.00
5.00
4.00
81.00
100.00
3.
2.
1 .
26.
32.
10.00
500
4.00
81.00
100.00
i, .
I.
1.
30.
37.
10.00
5.00
4.00
81.00
100.00
4.
2.
2.
32.
39.
10.00
5.00
4.00
81 .00
100.00
4.
2.
1.
30.
37.
10.00
5.00
4.00
81.00
100.00
^ .
2.
I.
3i.
45.
10.00
5.00
4. 3D
81.00
100.30
18210.
58.
PACE 1*
-------
NJ
N3
0 I M
DEPRECIATION
INTEREST
TOTAL
1/MG
$/MG 1975 DOLLARS
SPECIAL TAXES
Cl t H * OF TOTAL
6-5-032
5/11/76
CITY Of GEORGETOWN
10-YEAR CAPITAL AND OPERATING COST ANALYSIS
1966
1967
1966
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
73896. 61*11. 7*106. 749*2. 103584. 113212. 113381. 124531.
17000. 17037. 15801. 1*400. 13*00. 13611. 13800. 14031.
6100. 599*. 12090. 18187. 18000. 17*48. 16897. 18213.
96996. B***2. 101998. 107729. 13*984. 14*271. 144078. 156742.
233. 369. *16. 33*. 503.
310. *76. 50*. 419. 503.
0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 3. 3.
69.57 76.74 78.47 78.69 79.«5
PAGE 16
-------
6-5-002
5/11/76
CITY OF GEORGETOWN
COST SUMMARY FDR 1975
SUPPORT SERVICES' ACQUISITION * TREATMENT . DISTRIBUTION « INTEREST » TOTAL * TAXES » TOTAL H/TAX «
OF TOTAL
X OF TOTAL
h/TAX
122.
2"..50
13.
2.59
2.59
290.
58.05
58.05
58.
11 .62
11 .62
500.
100.00
100.00
0.
0.00
500.
100.00
IN SUMMARY:
DURING THE PAST 5 YEARS, » 805763. TOTAL COST IN 1975 DOLLARS PRODUCED
1862. MG HATER FDR AN AVERAGE COST OF 1 '«33./ Mi 11975 DOLLARS)
PAGE 18
-------
U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AOENCY
HATER SUPPLY COST STUDY
EPA CONTRACT 68-03-2071
FOR
CITY OF TAYLOR
6-5-003
5/12/76
ro
NJ
EPA PROJECT OFFICER
ROBERT CLARK
WATER SUPPLY RESEARCH D1V.
MUNICIPAL ENVIRONMENTAL
RESEARCH LABbRATORY
26 NEST ST.CLAIR STREET
CINCINNATI. OHIO 45260
TELEPHONE: (513) 684-7209
ACT SYSTEMS PROGRAM MANAGER
WILLIAM KYLE AOAMS
SUITE 200
807 WEST MORSE BLVD.
WINTER PARK, FLORIDA 32789
TELEPHONE! (305) 644-3900
UTILITY REPRESENTATIVE
MR. AOOLPH GRIEGER
CITY OF TAYLOR
PQ BOX 810
TAYLOR. TEXAS 76574
512-352-3675
STATE REPRESENTATIVE
MR. STEVE P. ELLISON
DOMESTIC WATER SUPPLY PROGRAM
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING
TEXAS DEPT. HEALTH RESOURCES
1100 W. 49TH ST.
AUSTIN. TEXAS 78756
EPA REGIONAL REPRESENTATIVE
HR. CHARLES SEVER
WATER SUPPLY OFFICE
US EPA
SUITE 1100
1690 PATTERSON
DALLAS, TEXAS 752D1
214-749-1962
-------
4-5-003
5/12/7&
ho
NJ
CITY OF TAYLOR
SYSTEM FACTS
1975
POPULATION - SMS'
COUNTY
CITY OR TO»N
RETAIL SERVICE AREA
AREA OF RETAIL SERVICE AREA
NUMBER OF METERS
NUMBER OF ACCOUNTS
NUMBER OF FLAT RATE ACCOUNTS
PURCHASED HATER - RAM
TREATED
SOURCE MATER - GROUND
SURFACE
PIPE IN SYSTEM
ELEVATIONS - INTAKES
TREATMENT PLANTS
SERVICE AREA M1N.
SERVICE AREA MAX.
REVENUE PRODUCING WATER
TREATED WATER
MAX. DAY
MAX. HOUR
FISCAL YEAR
IMPLEMENTATION DATE
PROCESSING DATE
N.A.
39000
951i
9616.
SO »U
35<.2.
0.
0 MG
0 MG
100.0 *
0.0 *
N.A.
565 FT
530 FT
500 FT
620 FT
285.6820 MG
393.2790 MC.
2.629 NG
N.A.
9/30
5/12/76
6/ 2/76
PAGE
-------
CITY OF TAYLOR
10-YEAR KEY OEM COST ANALYSIS
6-5-003
5/12/76
N5
ho
1966
1967
1968 1969 1970
COST/YEAR
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATKENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACOUIS1TIDN
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
28262.
122*7.
3768.
49930.
94206.
152.
66.
20.
268.
506.
30.00
13.00
4.00
53.00
100.00
27082.
11736.
3611.
47845.
90274.
122.
53.
16.
215 .
406.
30.00
13.00
4.00
53.00
100.00
31156.
13501.
4154.
55043.
103854.
176.
76.
23.
311.
586.
30.00
13.00
4.00
53.00
100.00
30754.
13327.
4101.
54332.
102513.
COST/MG
123.
53.
16.
217.
409.
* OF TOTAL
30.00
13.00
4.00
53.00
100.00
42800.
18547.
5707.
75614.
142668.
154.
67.
21.
272.
513.
30.00
13.00
4.00
53.00
100.00
42476.
18406.
5664.
75041.
1415S8.
142.
62.
19.
251.
474.
30.00
13.00
4.00
53.00
100.00
34205.
14822.
4561.
60428.
114015.
120.
52.
16.
212.
400.
30.00
13.00
4.00
53.00
100.00
40299.
17463.
5373.
71194.
134329.
95.
41.
13.
168.
317.
30.00
13.00
4.00
53.00
100.00
35401.
15340.
4720.
62542.
118003.
128.
55.
17.
226.
427.
30.00
13.00
4.00
53.00
100.00
41644.
18046.
5553.
73571.
136814.
146.
63.
19.
258.
4B<>.
30.31
13.01
4.0:
53.0i
100.0'
PAGE 4
-------
CITY OF TAYLOR
TREATMENT INFORMATION
6-5-003
5/12/76
TREATKENT PROCESSES
CHLQRINATION
I HATER TREATED «
100.*
TREATMENT CHEMICALS
CHLORINE
LB/NG TREATED
55.7
10-YEAR CHEMICAL COST ANALYSIS
1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1V71 1972 1973 1974 1975*
TUTAL COST
TRcATED KATES
BKLtO MC
»/MG TREATED
$/KG BILLED
2
-------
6-5-003
5/12/7&
CITY OF TAYLOR
RAK/TREATED WATER OUALITY INFORMATION
(UNITS ARE THE SAME iS SHCKN ON PAGE ABOVE)
CONSTITUENT * RUN 12/--/75 » m»TEO 12//75
* MIN. MAX. TEST * HIM. MAX. TEST
NITRATE (N) <-0<, <.0<.
FLUORIDE 2.8 3.0
SULPHATE ill 255
N5
N)
PACE 3
-------
N3
00
PAYRULL 1
MAN HOURS
MG SILLED CONSUMPTION
»/NG
6-5-003
5/12/74
CITY 01- TAYLOR
10-YEAR LABOR COST ANALYSIS
1966 1967 196B 1969
1970 1971
1972
197*.
51802. 49772.
296*0. 29640.
186. 222.
276. 224.
159. 133.
1 .75
1 .68
52153. 54157.
29640. 29640.
177.
66861. 61688. 63632.
29640. 2964J. 29640.
278. 299. 285.
240. 207. 223.
107. 99. 104.
2.26 2.06 2.15
159.
70.
2.28
258.
107.
2.41
1975
67463. 71429. 7486S.
29640. 29640. 2964D.
277.
PAGE 10
-------
6-5-003
5/12/76
CITY OF TAYLOR
10-YEAR POWER COST ANALYSIS
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
197Z
1973
1974
1»75
6446.
35.
2281 ,
10.
6971.
39.
6776.
27.
8<,56.
30.
K W H/H6
8496.
44600.
28.
149.
7820.
43760.
27.
153.
8591.
44340.
20.
105.
10997.
42360.
40.
153.
1329*.
39520.
47.
138.
N5
PA6E 12
-------
6-5-003
5/12/76
CITY OF TAYLOR
10-YEAR DEPRECIATION ALLOCATION
» 1966
1967 1968 1969
1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 «
DEPRECIATION COST »
SUPPORT SERVICES 1850.
ACQUISITION 5550.
TREATMENT 1850.
DISTRIBUTION 27750.
TOTAL 37000.
SUPPORT SERVICES 10.
CO
Q ACQUISITION 30.
TREATMENT 10.
DISTRIBUTION 149.
TOTAL 199.
SUPPORT SERVICES 5.00
ACQUISITION 15.00
TREATMENT 5.00
DISTRIBUTION 75.00
TOTAL 100.00
INTEREST S 8632.
INTEREST t/MC 46.
1950. 2050. 2150.
5850. 6150. 6450.
1950. 2050. 2150.
29250. 30750. 32250.
39000. 41000. 43000.
DEPRECIATION COST
9. 12. 9.
26. 35. 26.
9. 12. 9.
132. 174. 129.
175. 231. 171.
DEPRECIATION COST *
5.00 5.00 5.00
15.00 15.00 15.00
5.00 5.00 5.00
75.00 75.00 75.00
100.00 100.00 100.00
INTEREST COST
7915. 7250. 6719.
36. 41. 27.
2250. 2350. 2950. 3050. 3150. 3253.
6750. 7050. 8850. 9150. 9450. 9753.
2250. 2350. 2950. 3050. 3150. 3253.
33750. 35250. 44250. 45750. 47250. 48750.
45000. 47000. 59000. 61000. 63000. 65003.
i/HC
8. 8. 10. 7. 11. 11.
24. 24. 31. 22. 34. 34.
8. 8. 10. 7. 11. 11.
121. 118. 155. 108. 171. 171.
162. 157 207. 144. 228. 223.
OF TOTAL
5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.35
5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5. 3D
75.00 75.00 75.00 75.00 75.00 75. DO
100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
5632. 3377. 30450. 27211. 27544. Z7192.
20. H. 107. 64. 100. 95.
PAGE 14
-------
to
TOTAL
l/MG 1975 DOLLARS
SPECIAL TAXES
U t M \ Of TUTAL
6-5-003
5/12/76
CITY OF TAYLOR
10-YEAR CAPITAL AND OPERATING COST ANALYSIS
* 1966
0 L M 9*208.
DEPRECIATIUN 37000.
INTEREST 8632.
1967
9027*.
39000.
7915.
1966
103851..
41000.
7250.
1969
102513.
*3000.
6719.
1970
1*2668.
*500G.
5632.
1971
1*1588.
*7000.
337!.
1972
11*015.
59000.
30*50.
1973
134329.
61000.
27211.
1974
118003.
63000.
275**.
1975 . «
13881'*.
65000.
27192.
139S39. 137189. 15210*. 152232. 193300. 191965. 203*65. J225*0. 2085*7. 231006.
751. 617. 858. 607. 695. 6*3. 71*. 526. 75*. 809.
12*6. 99*. 1331. 892. 966. 855. 921. 636. 822. 809.
0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 3.
67.37 65.80 6H.28 67.3* 73.81 73.76 56.0* 60.36 56.58 60.09
PACE 16
-------
6-5-003
5/13/76
CITY OF TAYLOR
COST SUMMARY FOR 1975
SUPPORT SERVICES" ACQUISITION » TREATMENT < DISTRIBUTION INTEREST TOTAL » TAXES * TOTAL M/TAX
157.
OF TUTAL
OF TuTAL
X/TAX
97.
12.03
12.03
3.61
428.
52.95
52.95
95.
11 .77
11.77
609.
100.00
100.00
0.
0.00
839.
100.00
NJ
IN SUMMARY:
DURING THE PAST 10 YEARS. S 2426616. TOTAL COST IN 1975 DOLLARS PRODUCED
2684. MG MATER FOR AN AVERAGE COST OF S 904./ KG I 1975 DOLLARS)
PACE IS
-------
U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WATER SUPPLY COST STUDY
EPA CONTRACT 68-03-2071
FOR
BELL CO WCID»1
6-5-004
5/13/76
N3
OJ
EPA PROJECT OFFICER
ROBERT CLARK
WATER SUPPLY RESEARCH OIV.
MUNICIPAL ENVIRONMENTAL
RESEARCH LABORATORY
26 WEST ST.CLAIR STREET
CINCINNATI. OHIO 45260
TELEPHONE: ism 684-7209
ACT SYSTEMS PROGRAM MANAGER
WILLIAM KYLE ADAMS
SUITE 200
807 WEST MORSE BLVD.
WINTER PARK, FLORIDA 32789
TELEPHONE: oosi 644-3900
UTILITY REPRESENTATIVE
MR CARL G. WHITE
MANAGER
BELL COUNTY WCIO HI
P 0 BOX 43
KILLEEN. TEXAS 76541
817-526-6343
STATE REPRESENTATIVE
MR. STEVE P. ELLISON
DOMESTIC WATER SUPPLY PROGRAM
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING
TEXAS DEPT. HEALTH RESOURCES
1100 W. 49TH ST.
AUSTIN, TEXAS 76756
EPA REGIONAL REPRESENTATIVE
MR. CHARLES SEVER
WATER SUPPLY OFFICE
U S EPA
SUITE 1100
1600 PATTERSON
DALLAS. TEXAS 75201
214-749-19*2
-------
4-5-00*
5/13/76
N)
U)
BELL CQ »CID»1
SYSTEM FACTS
1975
POPULATION - SMSA
COUNTY
CITY DR TOnN
RETAIL SERVICE AREA
AREA OF RETAIL SERVICE AREA
NUMBER OF METERS
NUMBER DF ACCOUNTS
NUMBER OF FLAT RATE ACCOUNTS
PURCHASED VATER - RAU
TREATED
SOURCE HATER - GROUND
SURFACE
PIPE IN SYSTEM
ELEVATIONS - INTAKES
TREATMENT PLANTS
SERVICE AREA MlN.
SER VICE AREA MAX .
REVENUE PRODUCING HtTcR
TREATED yATER
MAX. uAY
MAX. HOUR
FISCAL YEAR
IMPLEMENTATION DATE
PROCESSING DATE
220757
172757
NONE
0.
0.00 SO MI
42.
1.2.
0.
580.Ob MG
0 MG
0.0 ».
100.0 t
17 MI
600 FT
735 FT
735 FT
880 FT
5578.90*0 MG
5802.0600 MG
26.» MG
28.5 MG
4/30
5/13/76
t/ 1/76
PAGE
-------
Ol
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATKENT
DISTRIBUTIUN
TOTAL
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
6-5-004
5/13/76
BELL CO UCID«l
10-YEAR KEY DIM COST ANALYSIS
1966 1967 I960 1969 1970 1971
COST/YEAR
1972
1973
1974
27608*.. 320558.
361509. 260650. 321275.
COST/MG
10"..
92.
33915. 40419. 50051.
821.45. 91623. 59889.
99935. 96069. 95089.
142280. 149739. 160001.
35S596. 378050. 405030.
1975
77728. 61382.
113547. 139260.
111025. 117565.
193244. 245529.
495544. 563734.
8.
20.
24.
34.
85.
8.
19.
20.
31.
79.
10.
20.
19.
32.
81.
15.
22.
21.
37.
95.
11
25
21
44
1D1
* OF TOTAL
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
9.i6 10.69 12.36
23.00 24.29 24.46
27.97 25.41 23.43
39.68 39.61 39.50
100.00 100.00 100.00
15.69 10.J9
22.91 24.73
22.40 20.35
39.00 43.>5
100.00 100.3D
PAGE 4
-------
BELL CO HC1D01
TREATHENT INFORMATION
6-5-004
5/13/76
» TREATMENT PROCESSES
SEDIMENTATION
COAGULATION
FILTRATION
CHLORINATION
FLUORIOATION
t HATER TREATED « TREATMENT CHEMICALS LB/NG TREATED
100.* CHLORINE 37.9
100. * FLUORIDE 8.0
100.*
100. X
100.*
10-YEAR CHEMICAL COST ANALYSIS
OJ
ON
TOTAL COST
TREATED HATER
BILLED MG
t/MG TREATED
S/MG BILLED
1966
29522.
3245.
3120.
9.
9.
1967
22014.
3209.
3085.
7.
7.
1968
21993.
3629.
3489.
6.
6.
1969
18721 .
3979.
3826.
5.
5.
1970
22423.
3634.
3495.
6.
6.
1971
25243.
4366.
4198.
6.
6.
1972
21868.
4973.
4762.
4.
5.
1973
18972.
5220.
5019.
4.
4.
1974
234BO.
5429.
5220.
4.
4.
1975»
25479.
5832.
5579.
4.
5.
PAGE
-------
6-5-00<.
5/13/7&
BELL CO HCIDK1
RAH/TREATED HATER QUALITY INFORMATION
(UNITS ARE THE SAME AS SHOWN ON PAGE ABOVE)
CONSTITUENT « RAM 12//75 * THEATEO 12//75
» MIN. MAX. TEST * HIM. MAX. TEST
NITRATE (N) 1.5 2.3
FLUORIDE 0.3 i.o
CHLORIDE 25.0 29.0
IRUN <.06 C.02
SULPHATE 22.0 22.0
U>
PACE
-------
to
CD
PAYROLL »
MAN HOURS
M& BILLED CONSUMPTION
i/MC
6-5-004
5/13/76
SELL CQ KCIDK1
10-YEAR LABOR COST ANALYSIS
1966
1967
196i)
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
56404. 62473. 62435.
16640. 16640. 16640.
3120. 3085. 3<.99.
16. 20 . 16.
5. 5. 5.
3.39 3.75 3.75
63699. 68244.
16640. 18928.
3B26. 3495.
17. 20.
4 .
5.
3.83 3.61
7514S. 68722. 75975.
18928. 1892B. 18928.
4198. 4782. 5019.
18. 14. 15.
5. 4. 4.
3.97 3.63 4.01
87856.
13928.
5220.
1975
97131.
18923.
5579.
17.
PAGE 10
-------
N3
LO
VO
6-5-00*
5/13/76
BELL CO WCID»1
10-YEAR POWER COST ANALYSIS
1966 1967 1968 1969
1970
1971 1972 1973 197*. 1975 *
POWER 1
65799. 64145. 101698. 77168. 104238. 126846. 131597. 150340. 178317. 254533.
S/HG
21.
27.
29.
30.
PACE 12
-------
6-5-00*
5/13/76
BELL CO HCIDtl
10-YEAR DEPRECIATION ALLOCATION
1966 1967 1968
1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975
DEPRECIATION COST »
SUPPURT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
527. 3800. 3770.
1791 . 12921 . 12818 .
4110. 29643. 29405.
4110. 29643. 29405.
10538. 76008. 75397.
3770. 3666. 4075. 4335. 4335. 4335. 4335.
12818. 12465. 13955. 14739. 14739. 14739. 1473J.
29405. 28597. 31785. 33813. 33813. 33813. 33813.
29405. 28597. 31785. 33S13. 33813. 33J13. 33813.
75397. 73325. 81501. 86700. B6700. 86700. 86703.
DEPRECIATION COST 4/HG
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
0. 1 . 1 .
1. 4. 4.
1. 10. 8.
1. 10. 8.
3. 25. 22.
1 . 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1.
3. 4. 3. 3. 3. 3. 3.
8 . 8. 8. 7. 7. 6. !>.
8. 8. 8. 7. 7. 6. b.
20. 21. 19. 18. 17. 17. 16.
DEPRECIATION COST 1 Of TOTAL
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
5.00 5.00 5.00
17.00 17.00 17.00
39.00 39.00 39.00
39.00 39.00 39.00
100.00 100.00 100.00
5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.03 5.00 5. DO
17.00 17.00 17.00 17.00 17.00 17.00 17.30
39.00 39.00 39.00 39.00 39.00 39.00 39.33
39.00 39.00 39.00 39.00 39.00 39.00 39.33
100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.30
INTEREST COST »
INTEREST i
INTEREST »/MG
15232. 153920. 150134.
5. 50. 43.
147573. 145692. 150695. 140248. 135739. 132462. 124025.
39. 42. 36. 29. 27. 25. 22.
PAKE 14
-------
6-5-004
5/13/7!)
BELL CO HCIDD1
10-YEAR CAPITAL AND OPERATING COST ANALYSIS
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
197*
1975
DIM
OEPRECI ATIuN
INTEnEST
TOTAL
»/h& 1975 DOLLARS
SPECIAL TAXES
Cl I M * UF TUTAL
27608*. 320556. 361509. 260650. 321275. 358596. 378050. 4D5030. 495544. 563736.
10538. 76008. 75397. 75397. 73325. 81501. 86700. 86703. 86700. 8i70D.
15232. 153920. 150134. 147573. 1*5692. 150685. 1<>02<.8. 135739. 132462. 12<,025.
30185*.. 550486. 587040. 483620. 540293. 590781. 604999. 627468. 714706. 77446D.
97. 178. 168. 126. 155. 141. 127. 125. 137. 139.
161. 287. 261. 186. 215. 137. 163. 151. 149. 139.
0- 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 3.
91.46 58.23 61.58 53.90 59.46 60.70 62.49 64.55 69.34 72.79
PAGE 16
-------
6-5-00*
5/13/76
BELL CO HCIDKl
COST SUMMARY FOR 1975
SUPPORT SERVICES' ACQUISITION TREATMENT DISTRIBUTION INTEREST TOTAL TAXES TOTAL H/TAX
0. 139.
* OF TOTAL
"
19.55
19.55
50.
36.07
36.07
22.
16.01
16.01
139.
100.00
100.00
X OF TUTAL 8.(.9 19.88 19.55 36.07 16.01 100.00 0.00 100.00
y/TAX
-C-
K5
IN SUMMARY:
DURING THE PAST 10 YEARS, » 7638113. TOTAL COST IN 1975 DOLLARS PRODUCED
-------
U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
HATER SUPPLY COST STUDY
EPA CONTRACT 68-03-2071
FDR
CITY OF KILLEEN
6-5-005
5/14/76
NJ
.{>
U>
EPA PROJECT OFFICER
ROBERT CLARK
WATER SUPPLY RESEARCH BIV.
MUNICIPAL ENVIRONMENTAL
RESEARCH LABORATORY
26 NEST ST.CLAIR STREET
CINCINNATI. OHIO 45260
TELEPHONE! 1513) 684-7209
ACT SYSTEMS PROGRAM MANAGER
WILLIAM KYLE ADAMS
SUITE 200
807 WEST MORSE BLVD.
WINTER PARK. FLORIDA 32789
TELEPHONE: (305) 644-3900
UTILITY REPRESENTATIVE
MR. OTIS A. PACE
WATER SUPERINTENDENT
CITY OF KILLEEN
400 NORTH 2ND ST.
KILLEEN. TEXAS 76S41
817-634-2191
STATE REPRESENTATIVE
MR. STEVE P. ELLISON
DOMESTIC WATER SUPPLY PROGRAM
DIVISION Of ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING
TEXAS OEPT. HEALTH RESOURCES
1100 W. 49TH ST.
AUSTIN. TEXAS 78756
EPA REGIONAL REPRESENTATIVE
MR. CHARLES SEVER
WATER SUPPLY OFFICE
US EPA
SUITE 1100
1630 PATTERSON
DALLAS. TEXAS 75201
214-749-1967
-------
6-5-005
5/14/76
NJ
-P-
CITY DF KILLEEN
SYSTEM FACTS
1975
POPULATION - SMSA
COUNTY
CITY OR TOWN
RETAIL SERVICE AREA
AREA OF RETAIL SERVICE AREA
NUMBER OF METERS
NUMBER OF ACCOUNTS
NUMBER OF FLAT RATE ACCOUNTS
PURCHASED HATER - RAW
TREATED
SOURCE MATER - GROUND
SURFACE
PIPE IN SYSTEM
ELEVATIONS - INTAKES
TREATMENT PLANTS
SERVICE AREA N1N.
SERVICE AREA MAX.
REVENUE PRODUCING HATER
TREATED HATER
MAX. DAY
MAX. HOUR
FISCAL YEAR
IMPLEMENTATION DATE
PROCESSING DATE
220757
172757
".5358
40357.
2.80 SO
11025.
11025.
0.
0 M6
1826.10 H&
0.0 *
100.0 *
128 MI
1025 FT
925 FT
1601.0390 MG
1626.0980 M&
8.426 HG
N .A.
9/31
5/14/76
6/ 1/76
PAGE
-------
CITY OF KILLEEN
10-YEAR KEY 0 I M COST ANALYSIS
6-5-005
5/14/76
1966
1967
NJ
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TRfcATIENT
OISTRI3UT1LN
TOTAL
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
1968 1969 1970
COST/YEAR
1971
1972
1973
197*.
1975
29953.
206890.
1736.
156563.
395141 .
31 .
214.
2.
162.
409 .
7.58
52.36
0.44
39.62
100.00
38483.
222829.
1429.
136913.
399655.
39.
224.
1.
136 .
401.
9.63
55.76
0.36
34.26
100.00
51401.
259097.
1899.
200777.
513173.
COST/MG
43.
219.
2.
170.
433.
* OF TOTAL
10.02
50.49
0.37
39.12
100.00
70422.
268679.
1713.
163387.
504201.
59.
226.
1.
1.37.
423.
13.97
53.29
0.34
32.41
100.00
67677.
297161.
2362.
212669.
579869.
49.
215.
2.
15=..
419.
11.67
51.25
0.41
36.68
100.00
67319.
290786.
1957.
201358.
561421.
46.
208.
1.
144.
401.
11.99
51.79
0.35
35.87
100.00
69976.
255650.
20B6.
236118.
563831.
47.
172.
1 .
159.
379.
12.41
45.34
0.37
41.88
100.00
80434.
263920.
922.
285888.
631165.
48.
159.
1.
172.
380.
12.74
41.81
0.15
45.30
100.00
91933.
289157.
1663.
2V6934.
679694.
57.
181.
1.
185.
42$.
13.53
42.54
0.24
'«3.i9
ICO. 00
PAGE
-------
CITY OF KILLEEN
ThEATMENT INFORMATION
ho
*-
ON
6-5-005
5/14/76
« TREATMENT PRuCESSEi » 1 hATER TREATED » TREATMENT
CHEMICALS »
CHLdRINATlON 100.'. CHLORINE
10-YEAR CHEMICAL COST ANALYSIS
1V66 1967 1968 1969
TOTAL COiT 1736. 1429. 1899.
TREATSO UATER -- 1061. 109*. 1302.
BILLED MO -- 966. 995. 11 64 .
S/M& TREATED -- 2. 1. 1 .
i/MG BILLED -- 2. 1. 2.
1970 1971
1713. 2362.
1310. 1521.
1191. 1363.
1 . 2.
1. 2.
LB/MG TREATE3
5.3
1972 1973 197i 1?75«
1957. 2086 . 922. 16bO.
1540. 1636. 1BO"». 1826.
1401. 14S9. 1660. 1631.
1. 1. 1. 1 .
1. 1. 1. 1.
PAOE
-------
6-5-005
5/14/75
CITY DF KILLEEN
RAW/TREATED WATER QUALITY INFORMATION
(UNITS ARE THE SAME IS SHOWN ON PAGE ABOVE)
CONSTITUENT o RAW II* TRtkTEU 06/25/75
» MIN. MAX. TEST » MIN. MAX. TEST
NITRATE (N) 1-2
FLUORIDE 0.7
CHLORIDE 35.0
MANGANESE <0.05
GROSS BETA 9.0+-1.B
GROSS ALPHA <2
PA&E B
-------
.p-
OO
PAYROLL 4
MAN HOURS
M& BILLED CONSUMPTION
»/M&
HH /Mb
6-5-005
5/14/76
CITY OF KILLEEN
10-YEAB LABOR COST ANALYSIS
1966
1967
1968
1969
1 J
1971
197J
1973
1974
1975
a6370. 96030. 1 1 3 B b 1 . 13333B.
'.78'.0. <(78<>0.
966. 995. 1181.. 1191.
89. 97. 96. 112.
50. 1.8. 40. 40.
1.81 2.02 2.38 2.79
1»403>«. 11.0580. 1552*3. 169371.. 185563.
1.992'J. ii9920. 4992D. 1.9920. 1.992J.
13B3. 11,01. 1*89. Io60. 16D1.
10".. ICO. 1C1.. 102. lib.
16. 36. 34. 30. 31.
2.89 2.82 3.11 3.39 3.72
PAGE 10
-------
CITY OF KILLEEN
10-YE4R POWER COST ANALYSIS
6-5-005
5/14/76
1966 1967
1969 1970
1971
1973 1974 1975 »
POWER 1
9836. 10325. 12930. 14828. 14487. 14061. 1558b. 20963. 26256.
K H ri/MG
VD
10.
10.
11.
12.
ID.
10.
10.
13.
IS.
PAGE 12
-------
6-5-005
5/14/76
CITY Of K1LLEEN
10-YEAR DEPRECIATION ALLOCAT13N
#
1966 1967 196d
1969
1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975
DEPRECIATION COST »
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TRcATHtNT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
4618. 4351.
0. 0.
0. 0.
41566. 39157.
46184. 435D7.
4964.
0.
0.
44678.
49642.
DEPRECIATION COST
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMfcNT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
5. 4.
0. 0.
0. 0.
43. 39.
48. 44.
H .
0.
0.
38.
42.
DEPRECIATION COST t
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
10.00 10.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
90.00 90.00
100.00 100.00
10.00
0.00
0.00
90.00
100.00
INTEREST COST
INTEREST t
INTEREST WHO
23693. 22980.
2S. 23.
22249.
19.
4974. 5202. 5732. 6203. 5938. 7913.
0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 3.
0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 3.
44766. 46819. 51592. 55625. 53442. 71215.
49740. 5J021. 57324. 62027. 59380. 79127.
l/MG
4. 4 . 4. 4. <* . 5.
0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 3.
0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 3.
38. 34. 37. 37. 32. 44.
42. 38. 41. 42. 36. 49.
OF TOTAL
10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.30
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
90.00 90.00 90.00 90.00 90.00 90.30
100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 103.33
t
21499. 20704. 55880. 56851. 55171. 150365.
18. 15. 40. 38. 33. 9*.
PAGE 14
-------
TOTAL
WMG
i/MG 1975 DOLLARi
SPECIAL TAXES
0 I M * LF TUTAL
6-5-005
5/14/76
CITY OF KILLEEN
10-YEAR CAPITAL AND OPERATING COST ANALYSIS
1966 1967 1968
0 t M 395141. 399655.
OEPRECIAT1DN 46184. 43507.
INTEREST -- 23693. 22980.
1969 1970
513173. 504201.
49642. 49740.
22249. 21499.
1971
579869.
52021.
20704.
1972
561421.
S7324.
55880.
1973
563831.
62027.
56851.
1974
631165.
59380.
55171.
1975 *
679684.
79127.
150365.
465018. 466143. 585064. 575440. 652595. 674625. 682710. 745716. 909176.
482. 468. 494. 483. 472. 482. 459. 449. 563.
775. 726. 726. 671. 627. 621. 555. 490. 568.
o. o. o. o. a. c. o. o. i.
84.97 85.74 87.71 87.62 98.86 83.22 82.59 84.64 74.76
PACE 16
-------
6-5-005
CITY OF KILLEEN
COST SUMMARY FOR 1975
SUPPORT SERVICES* ACOU1S1T10N « TREATMENT » DISTRIBUTION INTEREST TOTAL
TAXES TOTAL W/TAX »
* DF TJTAL
CiF TJTAL
N/TiX
62.
10.98
10.98
181.
31 .80
31.80
0.18
40.49
16.54
16.54
568.
100.00
100.00
0.
0.00
100.DO
IN SUMMARY:
DURING THE PAST 9 YEARS, i 7417405. TOTAL COST IN 1975 DOLLARS PRODUCED
11871. KG WATER FOR AN AVERAGE COST OF * 625./ H& (1975 DOLLARS)
PAGE 18
-------
U. 5. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
HATER SUPPLY COST STUDY
EPA CONTRACT 68-03-2071
FOR
CITY OF DENTON
6-5-006
5/17/76
ISJ
Ol
U>
EPA PROJECT OFFICER
ROBERT CLARK
WATER SUPPLY RESEARCH DIV.
MUNICIPAL ENVIRONMENTAL
RESEARCH LABORATORY
26 VEST ST.CLAIR STREET
CINCINNATI. OHIO 45260
TELEPHONE) (513) 684-7209
ACT SYSTEMS PROGRAM MANAGER
WILLIAM KYLE ADAMS
SUITE 200
S07 MEST MORSE BLVD.
WINTER PARK. FLORIDA 32789
TELEPHONE: oos> 6<.<.-3900
UTILITY REPRESENTATIVE
MR. EARL JONES
HATER SUPERINTENDENT
CITY OF OENTON
215 EAST MCKINNEY
DENTON. TEXAS 75201
817-382-9601
STATE REPRESENTATIVE
MR. STEVE P. ELLISON
DOMESTIC MATER SUPPLY PROGRAM
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING
TEXAS DEPT. HEALTH RESOURCES
110 H. «9TH ST.
AUSTIN, TEXAS 78756
EPA REGIONAL REPRESENTATIVE
MR. CHARLES SEVER
HATER SUPPLY OFFICE
US EPA
SUITE 1100
1600 PATTERSON
DALLAS. TEXAS 75201
2H-749-1967
-------
6-5-006
5/17/76
Ln
-p-
CITY OF DENTON
SYSTEH FACTS
1975
POPULATION - SMSA
COUNTY
CITY OR TOHN
RETAIL SERVICE AREA
AREA OF RETAIL SERVICE AREA
NUMBER OF METERS
NUMBER OF ACCOUNTS
NUMBER OF FLAT RATE ACCOUNTS
PURCHASED HATER - RAH
TREATED
SOURCE HATER - ORC/UND
SURFACE
PIPE IN SYSTEM
ELEVATIONS - INTAKES
TREATMENT PLANTS
SERVICE AREA MIN.
SERVICE AREA MAX.
REVENUE PRODUCING HATER
TREATED HATER
MAX. DAY
MAX. HOUR
FISCAL YEAR
IMPLEMENTATION DATE
PROCESSING DATE
3400000
95000
*6800
«6815.
32.30 SO MI
11591.
11591.
0.
2737.68 MG
0 MG
2.0 *
98.0 «
170 MI
500 FT
550 FT
7BO FT
2318.1360 MG
2641.2670 MG
16.5 MG
18.5 HG
9/30
5/17/76
6/ 1/76
PAGE
-------
6-5-006
5/17/76
CITY OF DENTON
10-YEAR KEY 0 t M COST ANALYSIS
Ul
Ol
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973
COST/YEAR
1974
1975
280000. 293025. 310470. 341147. 383381. 443732. 456016. 435370.
COST/MG
557652.
190.
174.
186. 179.
* Of TOTAL
167.
183.
183.
181.
194.
55683.
100945.
255353.
191B74.
603855.
24.
4i.
110.
83.
260.
9.22
16.72
42.29
31.77
100.00
PAtE 4
-------
CITY OF DENTON
TREATMENT INFORMATION
6-5-006
5/17/76
TREATMENT PROCESSES
SEDIMENTATION
FILTRATION
CHLORINATION
ACTIVATED CARBON
FLUORIDAT10N
X HATER TREATED
100. X
100. X
100.X
20.X
100. X
TREATMENT CHEMICALS
CHLORINE
FLUORIDE
CARBON
LIME
IRON
CALGON
POLYMER
LB/MG TREATED
50.7
5.1
24.4
179.3
160.7
20.2
2.3
10-YEAR CHEMICAL COST ANALYSIS
Ni
Ul
e
TOTAL COST
TRtATEO WATER
BILLED MG
»/MG TREATED
»/MG BILLED
1966
3016*.
1507.
1477.
20.
20.
1967
37467.
1717.
1633.
22.
22.
1968
37834.
1704.
1670.
22.
23.
1969
47052.
1940.
1901 .
24.
25 .
1970
47335.
2341.
2294.
20.
21.
1971
51314.
2479.
2429.
21.
21 .
1972
55934.
2547.
2496.
22.
22.
1973
41256.
2447.
2399.
17.
17.
197'*
55453.
2490.
2875.
22.
19.
U75«
76183.
2641.
2318.
21 .
33.
PAGE
-------
6-5-006
5/17/7&
CITY OF DENTON
RAN/TREATED WATER QUALITY INFORMATION
(UNITS ARE THE SANE AS SHOWN ON PAGE ABOVE)
CONSTITUENT « RAW 12/08/75 * TREATED 12/08/75
« M1N. MAX. TEST M1N. . 1AX. TEST
NITRATE IN) 0.7 0.5
FLUORIDE 0.3 0.7
CHLORIDE 28 31
IRON .30 .02
SULPHATE 32 <.0
Ol
PA6E 8
-------
ho
Ul
00
PAYROLL »
MAN HOURS
MG BILLED CONSUMPTION
J/HG
MH/MG
l/MH
6-5-006
5/17/76
CITY OF OENTON
10-YEAR LABOR COST ANALYSIS
1966
1967
1966
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
197*.
1975
105468. 124292. 165591. 179333. J13553. 228113. 198121. 215103. 281100.
59800. 59800. S9800. 61880. 63960. 66040. 68120. 70200. 70200. 72280.
1477. 1683. 1670. 1901. 2294. 2429. 2496. 2399. 2875. 2318.
63. 74. 87. 78. 88. 91. 83. 75. 121.
40. 36. 36. 33. 28. 27. 27. 29. 24. 31.
1.76 2.08 2.68 2.80 3.23 3.35 2.82 3.06 3.99
PAGE 10
-------
CITY OF OENTUN
10-YEAR POKER COST ANALYSIS
6-5-004
5/17/76
1966 1967 1966 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973
197-*
1975 «
POUER V
3504
-------
CITY OF OENTON
10-YEAR DEPRECIATION ALLOCATION
.
1966 1967 1968
1969
1970 1971
6-5-006
5/17/76
1972 1973 1974 1975 *
DEPRECIATION COST >
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
18822. 19939. 13299.
4183. 4431. 2955.
46009. 48740. 32509.
140118. 148436. 99005.
209132. 221547. 147768.
13306.
2957.
32525.
99052.
147839.
DEPRECIATION COST
SUPPORT SERVICES
Ni
ON ACQUISITION
O
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
13. 12. 8.
3. 3. 2.
31. 29. 19.
95. 88. 59.
142. 132. 88.
7.
2.
17.
52.
78.
DEPRECIATION COST X
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
9.00 9.00 9.00
2.00 2.00 2.00
22.00 22.00 22.00
67.00 67.00 67.00
100.00 100.00 100.00
9.00
2.00
22.00
67.00
100.00
INTEREST COST
INTEREST »
INTEREST S/MG
66209. 69623. 68017.
45. 41. 41.
68017.
36.
14271. 14218.
3171. 3160.
34884. 34756.
106237. 105849.
158562. 157983.
i/MG
6. 6.
1. 1.
15. 14.
46. 44.
69. 65.
OF TOTAL
9.00 9.00
2.00 2.00
22.00 22.00
67.00 67.00
100.00 100.00
t
90666. 86809.
40. 36.
16864. 18217. 21909. 26350.
3748. 4048. 4869. 5856.
41224. 44531. 53555. 64412.
125547. 135618. 163099. 196164.
187383. 202415. 243431. 292782.
7. 8. 8. 11.
2. 2. 2. 3.
17. 19. 19. 29.
50. 57. 57. 85.
75. 84. 85. 12i.
9.00 9.00 9.00 9.33
2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00
67.00 67.00 67.00 67.30
100.00 100.00 100.00 100.30
80418. 122633. 133124. 204223.
32. 51. 46. 3B.
PASE 14
-------
TOTAL
»/MG
t/MG 1975 DOLLARS
SPECIAL TAXES
Q £ H * OF TUTAL
6-5-006
5/17/76
CITY OF OENTON
10-YEAR CAPITAL AND OPERATING COST ANALYSIS
1966
0 C M 280000.
DEPRECIATION 209132.
INTEREST 66209.
1967
293025.
221547.
69623.
196B
310470.
147768.
68017.
1969
341147.
147839.
68017.
1970
383381.
158562.
90666.
1971
443732.
157983.
86809.
1972
456016.
187383.
80418.
1973
435370.
202415.
122633.
1974
557652.
243431.
133124.
1975
603855.
292782.
'04220.
555341. 584195. 526255. 557003. 632609. 688524. 723817. 760418. 934207. 1100857.
376. 347. 315. 293. 276. 283. 290. 317. 325. 475.
624. 559. 488. 431. 383. 377. 374. 384. 354. 475.
0* 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 3-
50.42 50.16 59.00 61.25 60.60 64.45 63.00 57.25 59.69 54.95
PAGE 16
-------
CITY OF OENTUN
COST SUMMARY FOR 1975
6-5-OOi
5/17/76
"SUPPURT SERVICES' ACQUISITION ' TREATMENT * DISTRIBUTION « INTEREST
TOTAL » TAXES * TOTAL W/TAX »
* OF TUTAL
* OF TUTAL
M/TAX
35.
7.45
7.45
9.70
138.
20.05
29.05
167.
35.25
35.25
18.55
18.55
475.
100.00
100.00
0.
100.00
ON
IN SUMMARY:
DURING THE PAST 10 YEARS. S 9264940. TOTAL COST IN 1975 DOLLARS PRODUCED
21542. KG WATER FOR AN AVERAGE COST OF t 430./ Ht (1975 DOLLARS)
PACE IB
-------
U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WATER SUPPLY COST STUDY
EPA CONTRACT 68-03-2071
FOR
COLONY HUD NO. 1
6-5-007
5/19/76
EPA PROJECT OFFICER
ROBERT CLARK
WATER SUPPLY RESEARCH DIV.
MUNICIPAL ENVIRONMENTAL
RESEARCH LABORATORY
26 WEST ST.CLAIR STREET
CINCINNATI. OHIO 45260
TELEPHONE! (513) 684-7209
ACT SYSTEMS PROGRAM MANAGER
WILLIAM KYLE ADAMS
SUITE 200
607 WEST MORSE BLVD.
WINTER PARK, FLORIDA 32789
TELEPHONE: oosi 644-3900
UTILITY REPRESENTATIVE
MR. FRANK 0. GRAHAM
DISTRICT MANAGER
COLONEY M. U. D. NO. 1
P 0 BOX 996
LEWISVILLE. TEXAS 75067
214-377-9181
STATE REPRESENTATIVE
MR. STEVE P. ELLISON
DOMESTIC WATER SUPPLY PROGRAM
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING
TEXAS DEPT. HEALTH RESOURCES
1100 W. 49TH ST.
AUSTIN. TEXAS 78756
EPA REGIONAL REPRESENTATIVE
HR. CHARLES SEVER
WATER SUPPLY OFFICE
JS EPA
SUITE 1100
1600 PATTERSON
DALLAS. TEXAS 75201
214-749-1962
-------
6-5-007
5/19/76
COLONY MUO NO. 1
SYSTEM FACTS
1975
POPULATION - SMSA
COUNTY
CITY OR TDNN
RETAIL SERVICE AREA
AREA OF RETAIL SERVICE AREA
NUMBER Of METERS
NUMBER OF ACCOUNTS
NUMBER OF FLAT RATE ACCOUNTS
PURCHASED WATER - RAW
TREATED
SOURCE WATER - GROUND
SURFACE
PIPE IN SYSTEM
ELEVATIONS - INTAKES
TREATMENT PLANTS
SERVICE AREA MIN.
SERVICE AREA MAX.
REVENUE PRODUCING WATER
TREATED WATER
MAX. DAY
MAX. HOUR
FISCAL YEAR
IMPLEMENTATION DATE
PROCESSING DATE
3400000
9500
N.A.
1552.
0.4<, SO NI
485.
<.85.
0.
0 MG
0 MG
100.0 *
0.0 *
N.A.
570 FT
570 FT
537 FT
570 FT
42.9100 MG
68.6200 MG
.623 MG
1.30 MG
3/31
5/19/76
6/ 2/76
PAGE
-------
6-5-007
5/19/76
COLONY MUO NO. 1
10-YEAR KEY D £ M COST ANALYSIS
1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1971. 1975 1976
COST/YEAR
SUPPORT SERVICES -- -- 2600*.
ACQUISITION 4500.
TREATMENT -- -- 2755.
DISTRIBUTION -- -- -- -- -- -- 7505.
TOTAL -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,075*.
COST/MG
SUPPORT SERVICES -- -- -- -- -- _- -- -- 606.
ACUUIS1TIJN -- -- .- -- 105.
TREATMENT -- -- -- -- .. .. .. -. 6!(.
DISTRIBUTION -- -- -- __ .. .. ._ 175.
TOTAL ~ -- -- -- .. _. .. 955.
* OF TOTAL
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
63.91
11.3".
6.75
18.1.0
100.00
PAGE
-------
6-5-007
5/19/76
COLONY MUD NO. 1
TREATMENT INFORMATION
TREATMENT PROCESSES
CHLORINAT10N
KATER TREATED
100.*
TREATMENT CHEMICALS
CHLORINE
LB/MG TREATED
10-YEAR CHEMICAL COST ANALYSIS
t>8 1969 1970 1971
1967
1972
1973
197S
1976»
NJ
O\
TOTAL COST
TREATED MATER
BILLED MC
S/MC TREATED
i/MG BILLED
6i2.
b9.
<>3.
9.
15.
PACE 6
-------
6-5-007
5/19/76
COLONY MUD NO. 1
RAM/TREATED HATER QUALITY INFORMATION
(UNITS ARE THE SAME AS SHOWN ON PAGE ABOVE)
CONSTITUENT * RAW / / » TREATED 06/03/75
* WIN. MAX. TEST KIN. MAX. TEST
NITRATE IN) <.*
FLUORIDE 0.9
CHLORIDE 270
SULPHATE 68
ho
ON
PAGE 8
-------
6-5-007
5/19/76
COLONY MUD NO. 1
10-YEAR LABOR COST ANALYSIS
1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 197". 1975 1976
Os
00
PAYRu'.L i -- -- -- -- 13865.
MAN HOURS -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3120.
MG BULED CONSUMPTION -- -- -- -- -- -- *3.
S/MG -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 323.
HH/MG -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 73.
PACE 10
-------
6-5-OJ7
5/19/76
COLONY MUO NO. 1
10-YEAR PDUER COST ANALYSIS
1967 1968
1969
1970 1971 1972 1973 197<» 1975 1976
6003.
30?B3b.
K » H/MG
7057.
PACE 12
-------
I
o
INTEREST »
INTEREST t/MG
6-5-007
5/19/76
COLONY MUD NO. 1
10-YEAR DEPRECIATION ALLOCATION
« 1967 196t) 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976
DEPRECIATION COST *
SUPPORT SERVICES -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 7531.
ACLUIS1T10N -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1J050.
TREATMENT -- -- 0.
DISTRIBUTION -- -- 129537.
TOTAL -- -- -- -- -- -- ~ -- 150625.
DEPRECIATION COST »/HC
SUPPORT SERVICES -- -- -- -- 176.
ACCUISITION -- -- -- -- -- 281.
TREATMENT -- -- -- -- -- -- 3.
DISTRIBUTION -- -- 301?.
TOTAL -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3513.
DEPRECIATION COST X OF TOTAL
SUPPORT SERVICES -- ~ -- -- -- -- 5.00
ACCU1SITION 8.00
TREATMENT 0.30
DISTRIBUTION -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 66.00
TOTAL -- -- -- -- 99.00
INTEREST COST $
17003.
39i.
PAGE
-------
NJ
0 C M
DEPRECIATION
INTEREST
TOTAL
S/MG
i/Ht 1975 DOLLARS
SPECIAL. TAXES
C L M * GF TUTAL
6-5-007
5/19/76
COLONY MUO ND. 1
10-YEAR CAPITAL AND OPERATING COST ANALYSIS
1967
1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973
197*
1975 1976
(.075!..
150625.
170DD.
208379.
0.
19.56
PAGE 16
-------
COLONY HUD NO. 1
COST SUMMARY FOR 1976
6-5-007
5/19/76
'SUPPORT SERVICES" ACIUIS1TION TREATMENT » DISTRIBUTION INTEREST
TDTAL « TAXES TOTAL H/TAX «
* OF TtlTAL
OF TOTAL
h/TAX
782.
16,21
16.21
8.00
64.
1.33
1.33
3194.
66.24
66.24
396.
8.22
8.22
4821.
100.00
100.00
0.00
100.00
IN SUMMARY:
DURING THE PAST 1 YEARS. » 189625. TOTAL COST IN 1975 DOLLARS PRODUCED
43. KG MATER FOR AN AVERAGE COST OF » 4419./ M& (1975 DOLLARS)
PAGE 18
-------
U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
HATER SUPPLY COST STJDY
EPA CONTRACT 68-C3-2071
FOR
DALLAS COUNTY KC1D NO 6
6-5-008
5/20/76
hO
J
CO
EPA PROJECT OFFICER
ROBERT CLARK
WAHR SUPPLY RESEARCH OIV.
MUNICIPAL ENVIRONMENTAL
RESEARCH LABORATORY
26 HEST ST.CLAIR STREET
CINCINNATI, OHIO (.5260
TELEPHONE: (515) 684-7209
ACT SYSTEMS PROGRAM MANAGER
WILLIAM KYLE AOAMS
SUITE 200
807 WEST NORSE BLVD.
WINTER PARK. FLORIDA 32769
TELEPHONE: oosi 644-3900
UTILITIES REPRESENTATIVE
MRS NANOA GAOOIS
OFFICE MANAGER
DALLAS COUNTY WC1D NO. 6
BALCH SPRINGS
2936 HICKORY TREE RO.
BALCH SPRING. TEXAS 75180
214-286-4*77
STATE REPRESENTATIVE
MR. STEVE P. ELLISON
DOMESTIC KATER SUPPLY PROGRAM
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING
TEXAD OEPT. HEALTH RESOURCES
1100 W. 49Tri ST.
AUSTIN, TEXAS 78756
EPA REGIONAL REPRESENTATIVE
MR. CHARLES SEVER
WATER SUPPLY OFFICE
US EPA
SUITE 1100
1600 PATTERSON
DALLAS, TEXAS 75201
214-749-1962
-------
6-5-00*
5/20/76
DALLAS COUNTY WCID NO 6
SYSTEH FACTS
1975
POPULATION - 5MSA
COUNTY
CITY OR TOKN
RETAIL SERVICE AREA
AREA OF RETAIL SERVICE AREA
NUMBER OF METERS
NUMiiEk OF ACCDUKTS
NUMbER JF FLAT RATE ACCOUNTS
PURCHASED WATER - RAW
TREATED
SOURCE HATER - GNQUND
SURFACE
PIPE IN SYSTEM
ELEVATIONS - INTAKES
TREATMENT PLANTS
SERVICE AREA MlN.
SERVICE AREA MAX.
REVENUE PRODUCING WATER
TREATED HATER
MAX. DAY
MAX. HOUR
FISCAL YEAR
IMPLEMENTATION DATE
PROCESSING DATE
16000
13800.
7.00 SO MI
3750.
3750.
0.
0 NG
3<.l.
-------
6-5-008
5/20/76
DALLAS COUNTY hCIO NO 6
10-YEAR KEY 0 C M COST ANALYSIS
1966
1967
1968 1969 1970
COST/YEAR
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
NJ
Ul SUPPORT S-RVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTS,.
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACOUIS1T1CN
TRbATMENT
DISTRI8UTIIJN
TOTAL
27732.
8979.
393.
16220.
53325.
175.
57.
2.
102.
336.
52.01
16.84
0.74
30.42
100.00
29610.
9099.
252.
22322.
61282.
174.
53.
1 .
131.
360.
48.32
14.85
0.41
36.42
100.00
28498.
25176.
157.
15810.
69641.
149.
132.
1.
83.
365 .
40.92
36.15
0.23
22.70
100.00
35701.
32665.
146.
19126.
87640.
COST/KG
148.
135.
1.
79.
363.
! OF TOTAL
40.74
37.27
C.17
21.83
100.00
35505.
47806.
150.
18983.
102444.
141.
190.
1 .
75.
407.
34.66
46.67
0.15
18.53
100.00
42731.
47557.
228.
23808.
114324.
151 .
169.
1 .
34.
405.
37.38
41.60
0.20
20.82
100.33
54999.
68491 .
39.
33207.
156736.
167.
209.
0.
131.
477.
35.09
43.70
0.02
21.19
100.00
68648.
79200.
35.
34158.
182044.
192.
221 .
0.
95.
509.
37.71
43.51
0.02
18.76
100.00
76806.
84301.
0.
38424.
199532.
225.
247.
0.
113.
586.
36.49
42.25
0.00
19.26
100.03
61372.
8997D.
3.
56631 .
208024.
182.
267.
3.
163.
613.
29.50
43.25
0.30
27.25
100.30
PAGE
-------
DALLAS COUNTS «C10 NO a
TkEATIENT I Nf U<*MJT I ON
6-5-008
TREATMENT PROCESSES « * KATER TREATED « » TREATMENT CHEHIC4LS
LB/Mt, TREATED
10-YEA.v CHtHICAL COST
1966 1961 i96d 1S69
1973 1971
197*
1973 1974
1975°
TDTAi. COST
TREATED uATER
BILLED H&
»/MG TSEATEO
t/NG BILLED
393.
159. 170.
1.
157.
191.
1*6. 15D.
252. 262. 328. 358.
1 .
0.
0.
0. D.
3*1.
<.!. 337.
0.
0. 0.
PAGE 6
-------
6-5-003
5/20/7b
D4LUS COUNTY WCID NO 6
RAH/TREATED WATER QUALITY INFORMATION
(UNITS ARE THE SAME AS SHOWN ON PACE ABOVE)
CONSTITUENT * RAW / / » TREATED / /
* HIM. MAX. TEST * HIM. 1AX. TEST
S3
PAGE 8
-------
PAYRUIL 1
h«N HOURS
MG BILLED CONSUMPTION
6-5-008
5/20/76
DALLAS COUNTY *CID NO 6
10-YEAR LABOR COST ANALYSIS
1966
1967
1963
19b9
197J
1971
1972
1973
197*
27982. 31161. 27992. 32019.
12118. 13151. 11221. ,1679.
159. 170. 191. 241.
176. 183. 147. 133.
76. 77. 59. 48.
2.31 2.37 2.49 2.74
34667. 41032.
11721. 13164.
252. 292.
134. 145.
47. 47.
2.96 3.12
1975
53205. 56531. 68316. 72131.
15349. 16866. 18269. 1856i.
326. 358. 341. 337.
162. 158. 201. 2H.
47. 47. 54. 55.
3.47 3.35 3.74 3.89
00
PACE 10
-------
N3
»-J
VO
6-5-008
5/30/76
DALLAS COUNTY UCID NO 6
10-YEAR POWER COST ANALYSIS
1966
1967
1966
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
POWER S
K h ri
l/HG
K » ri/M&
7579. 7779. 6623. 5728. 7*00. 7407. 5115. 6381.
711867. 729145. 562640. 531542. 680159. 670930. 415456. 495676.
48. 46. 36. 24. 29. 2t>. 16. 18.
4481. 4282. 2949. 2203. 2701. 2378. 1265. 1385.
5370. 5225.
371341. 291961.
16.
1090.
16.
669.
PAGE 12
-------
6-5-008
5/ZO/76
DALLAS COUNTY WCID NO 6
10-YEAR DEPRECIATION ALLOCATION
1966 1967 1968 1969
1970 1971 1972 1973 197* 1975
DEPRECIATION COST $
SUPPORT SERVICES 21*5. 2275. 2*37. 2567.
ACOUISITION 825. B75 . 937. 987.
TREATMENT 0. 0. 0. 0.
DISTRIBUTION 13530. 1*350. 15375. 16195.
TOTAL 16500. 17500. 18750. 19750.
DEPRECIATION COST
SUPPORT SERVICES 1*. 13. 13. 11.
00 ACOUISI TUN 5. 5 . 5. H.
O
TREATMENT 0. 0. 0. 0.
DISTRIBUTION 85. 8*. 81. 67.
TOTAL 10*. 103. 98. 82.
DEPRECIATION COST *
SUPPURT SERVICES 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00
ACuUlSlTILN 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
TREATMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
DISTRIBUTION 82.00 82.00 82.00 82.00
TOTAL 100.00 100.00 100.00 IOC. 00
INTEREST COST
INTEREST 4 2*115. 237*0. 23320. 22900.
INTEREST S/M& 152. 139. 122. 95.
2600. 2981. 36*7. 5*3. 5586. 5531.
1000. 11*7. 1*03. 209. 21*9. 2127.
0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 3.
16400. 18805. 23005. 3*26. 35236. 3*885.
20000. 2293*. 28055. *178. 42970. 425*2.
WMG
10. 11 . 11. 2. 16. 15.
4. *. H. 1. 6. b.
0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 3.
65. 67. 70. 10. 103. 134.
79. 81. 85. 12. 126. 126.
OF TOTAL
13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.30
5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.30
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.33
82.00 32.00 82.00 82.00 92.00 82.30
100.00 100.00 100.00 100.30 100.00 100. 3D
S
22*00. 61320. 72*44. 71094. 6974*. 69394.
89. 21*. 121. 199. 205. 233.
PAGE 1*
-------
00
TOTAL
»/MG 1975 COLLARS
SPECIAL TAAEi
(J t t x OF TL.TAL
6-5-008
5/20/76
DALLAS COUNTY KCID NO 6
10-YEAR CAPITAL AND OPERATING COST ANALYSIS
1966
DIM 53325.
DEPRECIATION 16500.
INTEREST 24115.
1967
61283.
17500.
23740.
1968
69641 .
18750.
23320.
1969
87640.
19750.
22900.
1970
102444.
20000.
22400.
1971
114324.
22934.
61326.
1972
156736.
28055.
72444.
1973
182044.
4178.
7109'+.
1974
199532.
42970.
69744.
1975 »
208024.
42542.
6839*.
93940. 10-2522. 111711. 13029C. 144843. 198583. 257235. 257316. 312245. 318963.
5'1- 602. 586. 540. 575. 704. 783. 719. 917. 94S.
982. 969. 908. 794. 800. 936. 1010. 870. 999. 943.
°- 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
56.77 59.77 62.34 67.27 70.73 57.57 60.93 70.75 63.90 65.22
PAGE 16
-------
6-5-008
5/2D/76
DALLAS COUNTY WCID NO 6
COST SUMMARY FDR 1975
'SUPPORT SERVICES' ACQUISITION » TREATMENT DISTRIBUTION « INTEREST « TOTAL * TAXES TQTAL H/TAX *
i/MG
X OF TUTAL
* OF TOTAL
H/TAX
199.
20.98
20.98
274.
2B.67
28.87
0.
O.QD
0.00
272.
28.71
28.71
203.
948.
100.00
100.00
948 .
100.00
00
Ni
IN SUMMARY:
DURING THE PAST 10 YEARS, » 2453620. TOTAL COST IN 1975 DOLLARS PRODUCED
2659. KG WATER FOR AN AVERAGE COST OF 1 923./ M5 (1975 DOLLARS)
PACE IB
-------
U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
HATER SUPPLY COST STUDY
EPA CONTRACT 68-03-2071
FOR
CITY OF CDCKRELL HILL
6-5-009
5/20/76
00
LO
EPA PROJECT OFFICER
ROBERT CLARK
WATER SUPPLY RESEARCH DIV.
MUNICIPAL ENVIRONMENTAL
RESEARCH LABORATORY
26 NEST ST.CLAIR STREET
CINCINNATI. OHIO 45260
TELEPHONE! (513) 684-7209
ACT SYSTEMS PROGRAM MANAGER
WILLIAM KYLE ADAMS
SUITE 200
807 WEST MORSE BLVD.
WINTER PARK. FLORIDA 32769
TELEPHONE: oosi 644-3900
UTILITY REPRESENTATIVE
MR. CECIL W. THOMPSON
WATER SUPERINTENDENT
CITY OF CUCKRELL HILL
4125 WEST CLARENDON
DALLAS. TEXAS 75211
214-330-6333
STATE REPRESENTATIVE
MR STEVE P. ELLISON
DOMESTIC WATER SUPPLY PROGRAM
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING
TEXAS DEPT. HEALTH RESOURCES
1100 W 49TH ST.
AUSTIN, TEXAS 78756
EPA REGIONAL REPRESENTATIVE
MR. CHARLES SEVER
WATER SUPPLY OFFICE
US EPA
SUITE 1100
1600 PATTERSON
DALLAS. TEXAS 75201
214-749-1962
-------
6-5-009
5/20/7!.
00
CITY OF COCKRELL HILL
SYSTEM FACTS
1975
POPULATION - SMSA
COUNTY
CITY OR TOWN
RETAIL SERVICE AREA
AREA OF RETAIL SERVICE AREA
NUMBER OF METERS
NUMBER OF ACCOUNTS
NUMBER OF FLAT RATE ACCOUNTS
PURCHASED WATER - RAW
TREATED
SOURCE WATER - GROUND
SURFACE
PIPE IN SYSTEM
ELEVATIONS - INTAKES
TREATMENT PLANTS
SERVICE AREA M1N.
SERVICE AREA MAX.
REVENUE PRODUCING WATER
TREATED WATER
MAX. DAY
MAX. HOUR
FISCAL YEAR
IMPLEMENTATION DATE
PROCESSING DATE
3500
3500.
1.00 SO HI
1040.
10*0.
0.
0 KG
116.118 MG
0.0 t
100.0 *
27 -U
NONE
NOME
101.7500 MG
107.1080 Ml
N.A.
N.A.
9/30
5/20/76
6/ 2/76
PAGE
-------
CITY OF CDCKRELL HILL
10-YEAR KEY D C > COST ANALYSIS
6-5-009
5/20/76
1966
1967 1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
N3
00
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACJUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
SUt>PURT SERVlCiS
ACJU1S1T10N
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACJUIS1T10N
TRtATKENT
UISTR1OUT ION
TOTAL
COST/YEAR
9143.
43566.
0.
9735.
62444.
COST/Kt
74.
354.
0.
79.
508.
>. OF TOTAL
14.64
69.77
0.00
15.59
100.00
12377.
42715.
0.
12054.
67146.
85.
292.
0.
82.
459.
18.43
63.61
0.00
17.95
100.00
13520.
42566.
0.
12170.
68256.
118.
372.
0.
106.
596.
19.91
62.36
0.00
17.33
100.00
16013.
44926.
0.
13714.
74653.
139.
389.
0.
119.
647.
21.45
60.18
O.CO
18.37
100.00
6934.
41918.
0.
13676.
62529.
65.
393.
0.
123.
587.
11.09
67.04
0.00
21.87
100.00
8589.
44603.
0.
13745.
66937.
76.
393.
0.
121.
569.
12.83
66.63
0.00
20.53
100.00
16603.
40111.
3.
15302.
72023.
163.
39'*.
1.
153.
70J.
23.36
55. S9
0.30
21.25
100.30
PAGE
-------
CITY OF COCKRELL HILL
TREATMENT INFORMATION
(,-5-009
5/20/76
TREATMENT PROCESSES
HATER TREATED
TREATMENT CHEMICALS
LB/HG TREATED
10-YEAR CHEMICAL COST ANALYSIS
-
TOTAL COST
TREATED NATEK
BILLED M&
1/MG TREATED
S/MG BILLED
1966 1967 1968 1969
0.
129.
123.
0.
0.
1970
0.
15*.
!<,&.
0.
0.
1971
0.
121.
115.
0.
o.
1972
0.
12Z.
115.
0.
0.
1973
0.
112.
107.
0.
0.
197',
0.
120.
114.
0.
0.
U75»
0.
137.
1D2.
).
0.
PAGE
-------
6-5-009
5/20/76,
CITY OF COCKRELL HILL
RAW/TREATED HATER CUALITY INFORMATION
(UNITS ARE THE SANE AS SHOW1 UN °AG£ A30VE)
CONSTITUENT « RAW II' TREATED 12/15/75
M1N. MAX. TEST * MIN. MAX. TEST
NITRATE IN) 0.9
FLUORIDE 0.8
CHLORIDE 33
ISDN 0.16
SULPHATE 50
00
PACE 6
-------
6-5-00*
5/20/7i
CITY OF CDCKRELL HILL
10-YEAH LABOR CQST ANALYSIS
1966
196B
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
CD
CO
PAYROLL I
MAN HOURS
MG BILLED CONSUMPTION
t/NG
10359.
2080.
123.
84.
17.
12*35.
20SO.
146.
89.
14.
6.22
14322. 15362.
2093. 2090.
115. 115.
125. 133.
Id. 16.
6.89
7.39
13278.
2090.
107.
125.
20.
6.38
13496.
1975
2093.
132.
191 .
23.
8.37
PAGE ID
-------
CITY OF COCKRELL HILL
10-YEAR POWER COST ANALYSIS
6-5-009
5/20/76
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1975 «
0.
0.
0.
0.
K » H/MG
0.
0.
0.
03
VO
PACE 12
-------
6-5-009
5/20/76
CITY OF CDCKRELL HILL
10-YEAR DEPRECIATION ALLOCATION
0
1966 1967 1968 1969
1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975
DEPRECIATION COST 1
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
SUPPORT SERVICES
ACQUISITION
TREATMENT
DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL
INTEREST I
INTEREST l/MG
226.
0.
0.
4296.
4522.
DEPRECIATION COST
2.
0.
0.
35.
37.
DEPRECIATION COST *
5.00
0.00
0.00
95.00
100.00
INTEREST COST
3424.
28.
226. 255. 255. 258. i78. 287.
0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 3.
0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
4296. 4851. 4851. 4894. 5288. 5443.
4522. 5106. 5106. 5152. 5566. 5735.
WHO
2. 2. 2. 2. 2. 3.
0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 3.
0. 0. 0. 0. 0. ).
29. 42. 42. 46. 47. Si.
31. 45. 44. 48. 49. SS.
OF TOTAL
5.00 5.03 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.30
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
95.00 95.00 95.00 95.00 95.00 95.00
100.00 100.03 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
s
3341. 3231. 3094. 2956. 2819. 2691.
23. 28. 27. 28. 25. 26.
PAGE 14
-------
6-5-009
5/20/76
CITY Of COCKRELL HILL
10-YEAR CAPITAL AND OPERATING COST ANALYSIS
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
0 I M
DEPRECIATIUN
INTEREST
TOTAL
i/MG
»/M& 1975 DOLLARS
iPtCIAl TAXES
D I M * UF TDT4L
62444. 67146. 68256. 74653. 62529. 66937. 72022.
452Z. 4522. 5106. 5106. 5152. 5566. 5735.
3424. 3341. 3231. 3094. 2956. 2819. 2691.
70389.
573.
842.
0.
88.71
75009.
513.
713.
0.
89.52
76593.
669.
893.
0.
89.12
82853.
718.
926.
0.
9U.10
70637.
663.
902.
0.
88.52
75322.
663.
723.
0.
88.87
B0435.
791.
791.
3.
89. 5^
PAGE 16
-------
6-5-009
5/23/76
CITY OF CDCKRELL HILL
COST SUM1ARY FOR 1975
"SUPPjRT SERVICES" ACQUISITION " TREATMENT < DISTRIBUTION » INTEREST » T3T4L < T4XES » TOT1L N/T4X >
»/H(j lbt>. 394. 0. 2J4. 26. 791. 0. 7*1.
* uF TuT4L 21.00 49.37 0.00 25.SO 3.3? 100.CO
'. OF TuTAL 21.00 49.87 j.OJ 25.80 3.33 100.00 0.00 103.00
M/TAX
N>
IN SUMMARY:
DURING THc PAST 7 YEARS, I 664494. TOTAL COST IN 1975 DOLLARS PRODUCED
821. MG HATER FOR AS AVERAGE COST OF 1 809./ Hi, (1975 DOLLARS)
-------
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
{Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
1. REPORT NO.
EPA-600/2-79-147b
3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
MANAGING SMALL WATER SYSTEMS: A COST STUDY
Volume II
5. REPORT DATE
September 1979 (Issuing Date)
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHOR(S)
James I. Gillean, W. Kyle Adams, Robert M. Clark
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
ACT Systems, Inc.
807 West Morse Blvd.
Winter Park, Florida 32789
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
1CC614, SOS 1, Task 35
11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
68-03-2071
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
Municipal Environmental Research LaboratoryGin.,OH
Office of Research and Development
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
Final
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
EPA/600/14
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES,
See also Volume I, EPA-600/2-79-147a.
Project Officer: Robert M. Clark, DWRD, Cincinnati, OH 45268, (513) 684-7488.
16. ABSTRACT
A study to determine the economics of water delivery was completed in 12 selected
Class A (revenues greater than $500,000/year) water utilities and is reported in
The Cost of Water Supply and Water Utility Management. Vols. I and II, EPA-600/5-77-015a
and 015b, November 19.77. The effort provided valid data on large water systems but
raised questions about the costs associated with small utilities.
As a follow-up to the earlier effort, a study of 23 selected small water utilities
was undertaken to determine the economics of water delivery. Data were collected from
seven to nine small utilities in each of three U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Regions.
Volume I of this report is an in-house effort that provides summary information
and in-depth analyses of the utilities studied. All utilities are analyzed in
aggregate, and factors affecting the cost of water supply are examined. An evaluation
of the hypothetical 1980 impact of the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974 is also provided
Volume II contains the basic data from each of the 23 utilities studied atad con-
tains the results from the contractual effort. Services of each utility are divided
into three functional areas common to all water supply delivery systems: acquisition,
treatment, and delivery. These areas provide a common basis for collecting and com-
paring data. Costs are categorized as either operating or capital expenditures.
This report is submitted by ACT Systems, Inc. in fulfillment of Contract
No. 68-03-2071 under the sponsorship of the U.S. EnvtronTtiani-al Pmf-Pfr-fnn Aoon^r
7.
KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
DESCRIPTORS
b.IDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
c. cos AT I Field/Group
Benefit Cost Analysis; Cost Analysis;
Cost Centers; Cost Comparison; Cost
Estimates; Economic Analysis; Economic
Factors; Forecasting; Incremental Costs;
Interest; Productivity; Regression
Analysis; Taxes; Water Distribution; Water
Production; Water Supply; Depreciation;
Primary Standards
Chemical Cost; Labor Cost;
Operating & Maintenance
Cost; Revenue Producing
Water; Safe Drinking
Water Cost; Secondary
Standards; Water Delivery
13B
14A
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
Release to Public
19. SECURITY CLASS (ThisReport)
Unclassified
21. NO. OF PAGES
307
20. SECURITY CLASS (This page)
Unclassified
22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (Rev. 4-77)
293
iir PII UTinG OFFICE: is»-657-146/5482
-------
uted States
vironmental Protection
lency
Environmental Research Information
Center
Cincinnati OH 45268
Postage and
Fees Paid
Environmental
Protection
Agency
EPA 335
ficial Business
nalty for Private Use, S300
Special Fourth-Class Rate
Book
Please make all necessary changes on the above label,
detach or copy, and return to the address in ihe upper
left hand corner
If you do not wnsh to r»c«ivt these reports CHECK MERE D,
detach, or copy this cover, and return to the address in Ihe
upper leh hand corner
EPA-600/2-79-147b
------- |