-------

-------
              AIR POLLUTION ASPECTS

                        OF

               BIOLOGICAL AEROSOLS
                  (MICROORGANISMS)
                 Prepared for the
   National Air Pollution Control Administration
Consumer Protection & Environmental Health Services
   Department of Health, Education, and Welfare
            (Contract No. PH-22-68-25)
      Compiled by Harold Finkelstein, Ph.D.
               Litton Systems, Inc.
          Environmental Systems Division
                7300 Pearl Street
             Bethesda, Maryland 20014

                  September 1969

-------
                          ABSTRACT






        Biological aerosols—suspensions of microorganisms in




the air—can cause diseases in humans, animals, and plants




and degradation of inanimate materials.  Several typical air-




borne infections of humans include tuberculosis, pneumonia,




the common cold, and influenza.  In addition, there is evi-




dence that biological aerosols and nonbiological air pollu-




tants may act synergistically to produce harmful effects.




Some airborne diseases of animals are tuberculosis, hog




cholera, and Newcastle disease.  Plants are susceptible to




airborne pathogens that cause such diseases as wheat rust,




potato blight, and almond brown rot.  Organic constituents of




protective paint coatings and other inanimate surfaces are




subject to microbial attack and damage.  The present know-




ledge pertaining to the relationships between dose-effect,




viability, survival of microorganisms in aerosols, and other




factors is insufficient for establishing standards for either




indoor or outdoor environmental air concentrations.




       The source of most human and animal airborne pathogens




is the host organism that recently harbored the pathogens.




However, since biological aerosols generally are detrimentally




affected by exposure to the atmosphere, they are usually found




in spaces close to the host.  However, certain plant pathogens




are more resistant to the atmospheric environment, and these




are often rapidly dispersed hundreds of miles by air within a




few days.

-------
       The abatement and control of biological aerosols have



been successful only in environmentally-controlled indoor



spaces.  There has been no adequate way to estimate either



the cost of the effects of biological aerosols, or the cost



of abatement and control.



       The available methods of analysis for biological aero-



sols tend to be specialized according to atmospheric condi-



tions, biological types, and particle size; consequently,



many different individual sampling devices are used.

-------
                               CONTENTS


FOREWORD

ABSTRACT

1.  INTRODUCTION	    1

2.  EFFECTS	    3

    2.1  Effects  on Humans	    3
         2.1.1  Airborne Diseases   	    3
                2.1.1.1  Bacterial  Diseases   	    3
                2.1.1.2  Fungal Diseases  	    4
                2.1.1.3  Viral Diseases   	    4
                2.1.1.4  Hypersensitivity Reactions  ....    6
         2.1.2  Synergistic Effects  	    6
    2.2  Effects  on Animals	   10
         2.2.1  Commercial and Domestic Animals   	   10
                2.2.1.1  Bacterial  Diseases   	   10
                2.2.1.2  Fungal Diseases  	   10
                2.2.1.3  Viral Diseases   	   11
         2.2.2  Experimental Animals  	   11
                2.2.2.1  General Experiments  	   12
                2.2.2.2  Synergistic  Experiments  	   12
    2.3  Effects  on Plants	   15
    2.4  Effects  on Materials	   15
    2.5  Environmental Air Standards  	   16

3.  SOURCES	   17

    3.1  Natural  Occurrence   	   17
    3.2  Production Sources   	   18
    3.3  Product  Sources	   26
    3.4  Environmental Air Concentrations  	   26

4.  ABATEMENT	   3!

5.  ECONOMICS	   40

6.  METHODS OF ANALYSIS	   44

7.  SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS	   47

REFERENCES

APPENDIX

-------
                     LIST OF FIGURES



1.  Daily Bacterial Counts in Urban Area	   62

2.  Hourly Bacterial Counts in Nonurban Area  ....   62

3.  Airborne Organisms in a Surgery Room	   63

4.  Effect of Distance Downwind of Treatment Unit . .   64

5.  Relative Position of Filter and Blower to
    Confine Contamination Inside or Outside Room  . .   65

-------
                       LIST OF TABLES
 1.  Age-Standardized Inception Rates of Incapacity
     Among Men in Three Different Occupational Groups . .   9

 2.  Isolation of Cryptococcus Neoformans 	  21

 3.  Bacteria in Air in New York City, January-June
     1936	„  28

 4.  Average Number of Alternaria Spores at One Site
     in Manhattan, Kansas	° °  29

 5.  Room Contamination in Organisms per Cubic Foot
     at End of One Hour and at Steady State	36

 6.  Resource Costs of Diseases Associated with Air
     Pollution  . . . . o	41

 7.  Common Airborne Bacterial Infections of Humans ...  66

 8.  Common Airborne Fungal Infections of Humans  ....  70

 9.  Viral and Related Agents Presently Recognized
     as the Cause of Human Respiratory Diseases 	  72

10.  Possible Airborne Virus Diseases of Animals  ....  75

11.  Common Laboratory Animals Used in Studies of
     Airborne Disease 	  76

12.  Average Micropopulation per Cubic Meter Found
     Simultaneously During 30-Hour Sampling Mission ...  77

13.  Quantitative Results from the Balloon-Borne
     Direct-Flow Samplers 	  77

14.  Air Dispersion of Small Organisms	78

15.  Recommended Conditions for Use of Common Germicidal
     Substances at Room Temperature (25°C)  ..<><>...  81

16.  Mathematical Model on Hospital Ventilation „ . . 0 .  82

17.  Roughing Filters o .... o ... 0 o . 0	84

18.  Medium-Efficiency Filters  	  85

19.  High-Efficiency Filters  	  87

-------
                 LIST OF TABLES (Continued)


20.  Ultra-High Efficiency Filters 	  89

21.  Penetration of Tl Phage and Bacterial Aerosols
     Through Commercial Air Filters  	  91

22.  Effect of Eradicant Fungicides on Sporodochia
     Production, Conidial Germination, and Blossom
     Blight Caused by Monillia Laxa on Drake Almond,
     1958	93

23.  Tuberculosis Hospital Use	94

24.  Death Rate for the 10 Leading Causes of Death,
     1966	„ . . . o . .  95

25.  Death Rate (1950 to 1966) and Deaths (1965 and
     1966) from Selected Causes	95

26.  Specified Reportable Diseases:  Cases Reported,
     1945-1966 ......... o 	  96

27.  Respiratory Diseases in the United States, July
     1966-June 1967	97

28.  Age-Specific Disease Rates per 100,000 Population
     per Year, 1959-61	98

-------
1.   INTRODUCTION



           Biological aerosols are defined as biological contam-



    inants occurring as solid or liquid particles in the air.



    These particles can vary in size from virus units of less  than



    0.1 (a* to fungal spores of 100 |a or larger.  The particles may



    occur as single, unattached organisms or as aggregates of  or-



    ganisms.  They may also adhere to a dust particle or be sur-



    rounded by a film of dried organic or inorganic material.



    Viable microorganisms are known to occur up to an altitude of



    about 20 miles, and fungal spores have been found in air flights



    over the North Pole.  For the purpose of this report, emphasis



    will be on those micoorganisms occurring as aerosols that  can



    be pathogenic for humans, animals, and plants and can cause



    damage to inanimate materials.  The microorganisms (microbes)



    generally involved are bacteria, fungi (yeasts and molds), and



    viruses.  Other microorganisms—such as algae, protozoa, and



    rickettsiae—generally do not cause disease by transmission as



    aerosols.  Some fungi have been implicated in hypersensitivity



    (allergic) reactions in humans, but this subject is discussed



    in a separate report of this series, "Air Pollution Aspects of



    Aeroallergens."



           The importance of disease transmission by biological



    aerosols has been in part a function of urbanization.  Because



    microorganisms do not generally survive very long as aerosols,
           *        i  \
            |j=micront s;.

-------
airborne transmission of human and animal diseases is limited



to indoor or crowded outdoor spaces.   The appearance of crowded



cities in what had been primarily a low population-density




agricultural society for the previous 1,000 years was a contri-



buting factor in the plague epidemic of 1348.  Since then,



respiratory diseases have been correlated with the extent of



crowded conditions in the cities.  Although progress in modern



medicine dramatically decreased the potential mortality rate



during the influenza pandemic of 1968, the incidence of the



disease demonstrated that we are far from an adequate control



of such diseases.

-------
2.   EFFECTS



           Biological aerosols have been shown to  produce  diseases



    in humans,  animals,  and plants  and microbial  degradation  of



    inanimate materials.  When airborne dissemination is involved



    in transmission of diseases,  the actual number of microorganisms



    dispersed by the host is relatively small,  and if dispersed



    into the open air, the living organisms represent a very small



    fraction of the total ambient air.   These pathogenic micro-



    organisms cannot reproduce in the air and generally do not sur-



    vive long because of adverse  conditions of humidity, temperature,



    and sunlight.  Airborne transmission of human  and animal patho-



    gens is therefore essentially limited to indoor spaces or  to



    closely confined outdoor spaces.  The general  exceptions to



    this fact are certain microorganisms that multiply saprophyt-



    ically in the soil and can be pathogenic to humans and animals.



    These microorganisms are not  dependent upon a  host reservoir



    for survival and can be more  widely dispersed  by air.   In



    general,  the symptoms produced by airborne infectious  agents



    are those of a respiratory disease, but transmission often can



    be by other means and results in symptoms other than respiratory



    ones.



    2.1  Effects on Humans



    2.1.1  Airborne Diseases



    2.1.1.1  Bacterial Diseases



           The  most common airborne bacterial infections of humans

-------
are the following:12'17'38'95'105'112'114

                  Pulmonary tuberculosis
                  Pulmonary anthrax
                  Staphylococcal respiratory infection
                  Streptococcal respiratory infection
                  Meningococcal infection
                  Pneumococcal pneumonia
                  Pneumonic plague
                  Whooping cough
                  Diphtheria
                  Klebsiella respiratory infection
                  Staphylococcal wound infection

The causative agent and the symptoms of each of these diseases

are presented in Table 7 in the Appendix.

2.1.1.2  Fungal Diseases

       The most common airborne fungal infections of humans are

the following:12'17'38'95'105'112'114

                  Aspergillosis
                  Blastomycosis
                  Coccidioidomycosis
                  Cryptococcosis
                  Histoplasmosis
                  Nocardiosis

The causative agent and symptoms of each of these diseases are

presented in Table 8 in the Appendix.

2.1.1.3  Viral Diseases

       The most common airborne viral respiratory diseases of

humans are these:12'17'38.51,91,95,105,112,114

                  Influenza
                  Febrile pharyngitis or tonsillitis
                  Common coId
                  Croup
                  Bronchitis
                  Bronchiolitis
                  Pneumonia
                  Febrile sore throat
                  Pleurodynia
                  Psittacosis

-------
More than 90 viral agents have been identified as the etio-



logical factor in respiratory tract illnesses.  Others remain



yet unrecognized by present laboratory techniques, which at



best identify the causative viral agent in only 50 to 60 per-



cent of respiratory infections.  Table 9 (Appendix) lists the



names of the viral, the one rickettsial (Q-fever),64/113



and related diseases in which airborne transmission is primarily



involved.



       In addition to those diseases listed in Table 9, several



viral diseases in which airborne transmission is at least



partly involved produce symptoms other than respiratory ones.



These are as follows:17'91'105'112



       Mumps is a swelling and tenderness of the parotid glands



that is sometimes accompanied by orchitis.



       Rubella (German measles) is a mild exanthematous disease



of childhood resembling measles.  However, its occurrence in



women during the early months of pregnancy is associated with



a high incidence of congenital malformations.



       Rubeola (measles) is the commonest disease of childhood.



The median number of cases reported per year ,in this country



exceeds half a million.  Rubeola is characterized by a cough



and fever and a macular or maculopapular rash tending to become




confluent.



The transmission of several other viral diseases can be due



in part to airborne contaminated dust and skin scales:  ''91'105

-------
       Variola (smallpox) is characterized by vesicles over



most of the skin surfaces.  Although it is endemic elsewhere



in the world, no confirmed cases have been reported in this



country since 1954.



       Varicella (chickenpox) is a common, highly contagious,



exanthematous disease of childhood that occurs in epidemic



form.




       Herpes zoster (shingles) is similar to varicella but



occurs more frequently in adults.



2.1.1.4  Hypersensitivity Reactions



       A number of fungi, and possibly algae as well, have



been implicated in hypersensitivity (allergic) reactions in



humans.  Evidence has been presented in recent years that



the symptoms of such diseases as farmer's lung, mushroom



lung, and other diseases formerly considered to be infectious



were the results of hypersensitivity responses.  These



syndromes will not be discussed in this report but are in-



cluded in another report in this series,  "Air Pollution Aspects



of Aeroallergens. "



2.1.2  Synergistic Effects



       As modern air pollution information has accumulated,



it has become apparent that increases in respiratory infection



morbidity and mortality of the exposed population may be re-



lated to excessively high levels of nonbiological air pol-



lutants.  That is, the two types of pollutants—biological and



nonbiological—may produce synergistic or potentiating effects.

-------
However, as so often in the study of natural human infections,



one is limited to conclusions based upon medical statistics



on uncontrolled events and situations.  The number of model



situations in which high levels of air pollution were ac-



companied by marked increases in respiratory disease morbidity



and mortality .and adverse weather conditions has been limited.



Conditions in the laboratory with experimental animals are



subject to better control, but there are, nevertheless,



limitations in applying results to human disease processes.



       Several reports are available on the potentiation of



air pollution and influenza.  Both high levels of air pollution



and influenza occurred in London in December 1952 in which



4,000 deaths occurred,73'87 and again in 1958 to 1959.65 The



observations indicated a parallel correlation between the



increase in air pollution and an increase in the disease.



Greenburg et al.,44 in a study of pediatric and adult clinic



visits, found an increase in upper respiratory illness during



the New York City air pollution incident of November 1953.



They investigated the influenza epidemic in New York City



during the fall of 1957 but could not ascertain quantitative



relationships between air pollution and influenza.45 However,



during the period of January 29 to February 12, 1963, another



occurrence of influenza in New York City did show a correlation



with air pollution.  During this period, 809 deaths occurred



in excess of the overall average number of deaths for the

-------
                                                              8
same 15-day periods in 1961, 1962, 1964, and 1965.  This in-



crease in mortality took place primarily in the older age



groups—45 to 64, and 65 and over.45 Dohan25 reported a de-




crease in respiratory illnesses in Pittsburgh in the years



following the intensive efforts to control air pollution.



       Douglas and Waller26 in 1966 reported on a study of a



group of schoolchildren performed as part of the National



Survey of Health and Development in Great Britain.  The pur-



pose of the study was to examine the relationship between



respiratory infections and prolonged exposure in areas of



high and low air pollution.  Douglas and Waller followed the



medical histories of 5,362 children born during the first



week of March 1946 until they reached the age of 15 in 1961.



At that time 4,592 were still living in Great Britain, and



complete medical records were available for 3,866.  The in-



vestigators concluded that upper respiratory tract infections



were not related to the amount of air pollution, but that lower



respiratory tract infections were.  Also, the frequency and



severity of the lower respiratory tract infections increased



with the amount of air pollution exposure, and both boys and



girls were affected equally.  An association between lower



respiratory tract infection and air pollution was found at



each age examined (6,7,11, and 15 years).  There were no dif-



ferences observed between children in middle- and working-class




families.

-------
       Lunn et al.63 collected respiratory illness data on

819 schoolchildren between 5 and 6 years old who had lived in

the Sheffield area most of their lives.  These investigators

reported a relationship between both upper and lower res-

piratory illnesses and air pollution.  However, socioeconomic

factors—such as social class, number of children in the house, and

and sharing of bedrooms—appeared to have little influence upon

the respiratory illnesses among the children.

       Alderson2 presented data from the British Ministry of

Pensions and National Insurance which showed that different

illness patterns existed among individuals of three occupations.

Coal miners had more respiratory illnesses than professional

and technical personnel, who  in turn had more than agricul-

tural workers.  The illness patterns are presented in part in

Table  1.

       The results of animal  experiments in relation to

synergistic effects are discussed in Section 2.2.2, Experi-

mental Animals.
                            TABLE  1

     AGE-STANDARDIZED  INCEPTION RATES  OF  INCAPACITY AMONG
         MEN  IN THREE DIFFERENT OCCUPATIONAL GROUPS2
Diagnosis
Acute upper
respiratory
infection
Influenza
Bronchitis
Men Incapacitated per 100 at Risk
Agricultural
Workers
40
60
47
Coal Miners,
Face Workers
284
234
205
Professional and
Technical Personnel
87
80
51

-------
                                                            10
2.2  Effects on Animals




2.2.1  Commercial and Domestic Animals




       Few diseases of commercial and domestic animals can be




attributed to airborne aerosols.  Most animal diseases are




transmitted by contact by insect bites, and through ingestion




of contaminated food and water.





2.2.1.1  Bacterial Diseases




       Two bacterial airborne diseases of animals are tuber-




culosis (Mycobacterium bovis) of cattle,  swine, sheep, dogs,




and cats, the control of which in the United States has been




by slaughter; and glanders (Actinobacillus (Malleomyces) mallei),




a tuberculosis-like, high-mortality disease of horses, mules,




and asses.11'69'70



2.2.1.2  Fungal Diseases



       Several fungal diseases of animals that may possibly be



             J.-U  * i-i      11,69,70
airborne are the following:




       Aspergillosis occurs in domesticated birds, pigeons,




ducks, and chickens.  It can occur as a superficial infection




of the air sacs, which become covered with a mat of green




mycelium; a nodular tubercle-like mass; or a diffusely infil-




trated pneumonic infection of the lung.  In chicks, an epidemic

-------
                                                             11
form is known as "brooder pneumonia," the source being inhala-

tion of grain and straw heavily contaminated with mold.   A

nodular or pneumonic form can occur also in cattle and sheep,

and especially in horses.

       Cryptococcosis can occur in the lungs of horses and

result in granulomas.   Emmons35 found virulent strains  of

Cryptococcus neoformans in pigeon manure.  It has also been

described as the etiological agent in a severe outbreak  of

bovine mastitis.12

       Coccidioidomycosis is endemic in areas of the South-

west United States.  It occurs naturally in domestic animals,

including cattle, horses, sheep, swine, and dogs, and also

in certain wild rodents (pocket mouse, kangaroo rat, and

grasshopper mouse).

2.2.1.3  Viral Diseases

       The most common viral diseases of animals are as

follows:11'69'70

                  Hog cholera
                  Equine influenza
                  Swine influenza
                  Feline distemper
                  Canine distemper
                  Newcastle disease
                  Infectious bronchitis

       The symptoms of these diseases are presented in Table

10 in the Appendix.

2.2.2  Experimental Animals

-------
                                                             12
2.2.2.1  General Experiments

       Table 11 (Appendix) lists the airborne bacterial and


fungal diseases and the common laboratory animals which have


been used in aerosol studies.  However, the use of laboratory


animals—mice, rabbits, guinea pigs, and monkeys—has generally

been limited in virus aerosol studies because of the specific


host-parasite relationship of viruses.

2.2.2.2  Synergistic Experiments

       Because of the difficulties in studying the potential


synergistic effects of nonbiological and biological air

pollutants on humans, many experiments have been made using

experimental animals exposed to mixtures of artificially pro-

duced aerosols under the relatively controlled conditions of


the laboratory.

       Miller and Ehrlich   studied the effect of ozone on


susceptibility to respiratory infection in mice exposed to

aerosols of Klebsiella pneumoniae and various streptococcus


species.  The mice were also exposed to ozone concentrations

of 0.4 to 4.4 ppm for periods ranging from 3 to 100 hours.

The time between ozone exposure and subsequent aerosol exposure

or challenge was 1 hour.  Exposure to ozone significantly

reduced resistance to infection as measured by mortality rate

                                    QQ
and survival time.  In a later study,   it was found that the


mice's resistance was reduced for as long as 19 hours between


ozone exposure and aerosol challenge.  Coffin and Blommer15

-------
                                                             13
reported that exposure to 0.7 to 0.9 ppm ozone for 2 hours



enhanced mortality to streptococcal pneumonia in mice.  The



exposure to the streptococcal aerosol occurred 30 minutes



following the ozone.  The mortality rate was further enhanced



by exposure of the mice to a cold temperature (6 to 9° C) for




3 hours prior to the ozone and streptococcus aerosol.  The



authors believed that the effect of the cold temperature was



to potentiate the ozone effect.  Thienes et al.    were un-



able to demonstrate a potentiation effect between ozone and



tuberculosis in mice.



       Ehrlich^ has reviewed the effects of nitrogen dioxide



(N02) on the resistance of laboratory animals to K. pneumoniae



infections.  A single 2-hour exposure of mice to 3.5 ppm of



nitrogen dioxide before or after respiratory challenge with



aerosol of f\. pneumoniae significantly increased mortality.



To produce the same effects in hamsters and squirrel monkeys,



35 ppm was required.  The effect of the single 2-hour exposure



was not persistent, and it was observed that normal resistance



to the infection returned within 24 hours after cessation of



the exposure to nitrogen dioxide.  Continuous exposures to



0.5 ppm for 3 months or longer, as well as intermittent daily



exposures over a 30-day period, produced the same effect in



mice as the single 2-hour exposure to 3.5 ppm.  Intermittent



exposure of mice to 0.5 ppm for 6 to 18 hours per day for 6


                                                            33
months also resulted in a significantly increased mortality.

-------
                                                             14
       Henry et al.49 in studying the combined effects of



nitrogen dioxide and K. pneumoniae microorganisms on squirrel



monkeys, reported that a combined stress of 50 ppm N02 and



104 cells of K. pneumoniae—neither in itself fatal—produced



death.  At N02 concentrations of 35 ppm or less,  death did



not occur, but bacterial clearance from the lungs was delayed



or prevented.  Monkeys exposed only to the challenge dosage of



K. pneumoniae showed no bacteria in their lungs 15 to 57 days



following challenge.  However, if preceded with 10 ppm NO,,
                                                         ^


K. pneumoniae could be found in the lungs 19 to 51 days later.



       Coffin and Blommer1  have reported results indicating



that light-irradiated automobile engine exhaust enhanced the



pneumonia mortality rate of mice exposed to a streptococcal



aerosol.

                                          t

       Inert dust particles have been reported to potentiate



infections in laboratory animals.  Tacquet1   observed an



increase in pathogenicity and in the number of mycobacteria



isolated from the lungs of guinea pigs following  inhalation


                               61
of inert carbon dust.  Laurenzi x reported that the natural



clearance of aerosolized staphylococci from the lungs of mice



was impaired by inhalation of cigarette smoke or  intraperitoneal


                                            40

injections of ethyl alcohol.  Green and Kass   have made similar




observations.

-------
                                                             15
2.3  Effects on Plants

       Plants are susceptible to bacterial,  fungal,  and viral

diseases.  Some of these diseases are disseminated by means of

insects, birds, animals, or water; but many—primarily the

fungi—are subject to airborne dispersal.  The following is

a list of such, airborne plant diseases:3'14'22'90'124'129

                  Almond brown rot
                  Azalea flower spot
                  Beet downy mildew
                  Blossom infection
                  Cedar rust
                  Apple rust
                  Chestnut blight
                  Crown rust of oats
                  Downy mildew
                  Leaf spots on tulips
                  Loose smut of wheat
                  Maize rust
                  Onion mildew
                  Potato late blight
                  Powdery mildew on barley
                  Stem rust of wheat and rye
                  Tobacco blue mold
                  White pine blister rust

2.4  Effects on Materials

       Microorganisms are essential in normal decay processes.

Therefore, all material surfaces in contact with the air are

theoretically subject in some degree to microbial degradation

by saprophytic microorganisms.  The most obvious general

example of this is food spoilage, a continual problem.  The

magnitude of this problem is related to the local climate:

maximum spoilage occurs in a-hot, humid climate and minimum

spoilage in a cold, dry climate.

-------
                                                             16
       Saprophytic fungi can grow on the surfaces of many



inanimate materials where there is high humidity-  The or-



ganisms may utilize either the coating or the underlying



surface as food, and may produce corrosive acid or alkali



wastes as a result of their metabolic processes.  These wastes



may in turn attack the surfaces on which they are growing.



For example, the modern field of miniaturized electronics is



faced with this problem:  the miniaturized circuits, unless



protected by varnishes containing fungicides, can be damaged



by the growth of fungi.    Larsen60 in 1957 pointed out that



organic constituents of protective paint coatings may be



subject to microbial attack and damage.



2.5  Environmental Air Standards



       There are no environmental air standards applicable to



biological aerosols at the present time.  Current knowledge



pertaining to the relationship between dose-effect, viability,



survival of microorganisms in aerosols, sampling procedures,



and aerosol production is insufficient for establishing stand-



ards for either indoor or outdoor environmental air concentra-



tions.

-------
                                                                 17
3.   SOURCES



    3.1  Natural Occurrence



           Microorganisms are ubiquitous in nature.  However, all



    microorganisms found in the air had as their original habitat



    either soil, water, humans, animals, or plants.  Microorgan-



    isms become airborne from the soil and from plants  by wind



    disturbances, and from water by wave and wind action.  They



    come from animals through shedding, excreta, and respiratory



    droplets, and from humans through shedding from skin and



    clothing and through respiratory droplets produced by speech,



    coughing, and sneezing.  Some types of organisms are more



    plentiful in the air than others, because of their size



    (i.e., they are small enough to remain airborne), the magni-



    tude of the emission source, the death rate of organisms sus-



    pended in the air,- and other factors.  Microorganisms have



    been found at various altitudes.   Fulton39 in sampling the




    air above San Antonio, reported average peak concentrations



    of 250, 75, and 35 microorganisms per cubic meter at 690,



    1,600, and 3,127 meters' altitude respectively (Table 12,



    Appendix) .  Microorganisms have also been recovered in balloon



    flights up to 90,000 ft.10  (Table 13, Appendix).



           Most of the microorganisms found in the air are



    saprophytic and generally are not pathogenic.  Those which are



    pathogenic, with some exceptions, come from a living host.



    Since they are usually detrimentally affected by exposure to

-------
                                                             18
the atmosphere, they are only found in close proximity to the



host.  However, certain plant pathogens can have rapid and wide-



spread aerial dispersal over hundreds of miles within a few



days.I0?




       The survival of biological aerosols has been studied



rather intensively in recent years, primarily in laboratory



studies.  Most of these studies have been concerned with



bacteria, and relatively little is known of the behavior of



viruses and fungi.  No simple relationship has been found



between the degree of survival and age of the aerosol.  The



half-life of the aerosol is affected by such variable factors



as the species of microorganisms (spore-former or non-spore-



former); metabolic state of the microorganism; the relative



humidity, gaseous composition, and temperature of the air;



radiation; collection method; and others.  Because of the



large number of these variables and their interrelationship,



both the results and the interpretations of aerosol survival



studies are markedly dependent upon the precise technique



employed.^




3.2  Production Sources



       The spread of influenza, the common cold, and other such



diseases in the home, office, or schoolroom is readily apparent.



Similar disease transmission takes place in hospitals as well.



For example, the spread of staphylococcal infections in hospi-



tals has been a considerable problem.  Staphylocoecus aureus

-------
                                                             19
is commonly found in the normal nasal flora of 30 to 50 per-



cent of healthy adults (carriers).    Studies on nasal car-




riers showed that while direct dispersal did not take place to



any great extent under normal conditions, large numbers of



infectious airborne particles might be produced by active



movements.    The bedclothing of carriers also becomes rapidly



infected.77-96 Wilkoff et al.125 studied the viability of



Staphylococcus aureus dispersed by aerosol on various fabrics



(wool blanket, wool abardine, cotton sheeting, cotton knit



jersey, cotton terry cloth, and cotton wash-and-wear material).



He found that staphylococcal populations persisted long enough



(4 to 24 weeks) to be of epidemiological importance.  Davies


         91
and Noble   observed under a microscope that airborne parti-



cles from a hospital ward included many skin scales containing



staphylococci.  In addition, they found that the skin scales



and bacterial content of the air rose significantly during bed-



making .



       Eichenwald et al.34 have described a direct dispersal



of smaller than normal (< 5 |j) particles containing staphylococci



from the upper respiratory tract of newborn infants in a nurs-



ery.  These "cloud babies" had a respiratory virus infection



and, apparently because of the slightly restricted air passages,



were producing "clouds" of staphylococci.  Staphylococci



are commonly found on the healthy skin and, therefore, skin



desquamation is an important source of hospital staphylococci.



Some individuals are prolific dispersers.

-------
                                                             20
       Airborne dust containing streptococci has been found



in hospital wards containing patients with streptococcal in-



fections.  M. tuberculosis has also been found in the dust



of  sanitariums, and the diphtheria organism in floor dust near



diphtheria patients.114




       Gip   was able to isolate airborne dermatophytes from



a commercial bathhouse, a dressing room in an automobile fac-



tory, and a hospital, as well as in a gymnasium during a



basketball game.  However, the role of such isolated derma-



tophytes as exogenous agents of fungus infection is still



open to question.



       Procknow   in 1967 reported isolating Histoplasma



capsulatum annually for 15 years from the dust of an unused



silo.  At the time of its abandonment in 1950, the silo was



the source of histoplasmosis contracted by a farm family of six.



       Emmons36 was able to isolate H. _capsulatum from all 10



soil samples collected in a downtown park in Washington, B.C.



He attributed the presence of the fungus to droppings from



starlings roosting in trees.



       D'Alessio20 reported an urban epidemic of histoplasmosis



which occurred in Mason City, Iowa, in 1962.  The source of



the fungus, proved by the recovery of the organism from the



soil, was a starling roost in the center of town.  The airborne



epidemic had occurred after bulldozing of vegetation in the



area had produced clouds of dust.  It was concluded that about

-------
                                                             21
2,400 schoolchildren and about 6,000 adults had been infected



during the epidemic.



       Virulent strains of Cryptococcus neoformans have been



found in pigeon manure in old pigeon nests and under roosting


      35
sites.   The organism was isolated from 63 of 91 specimens



obtained in arid around Washington, B.C. (Table 2).
                          TABLE 2
              ISOLATION OF CSYPTOCOCCUS NEOFORMANS
                                                  35
Sources of Collection
Warehouse, former barn
Old school building, now offices
Grain mill establishment
Cupola on high school building
Window ledges, Federal and municipal
office buildings
Public parks
Railroad station
Barns (Virginia and Maryland)
Total
Number of
Specimens
Collected
15
10
5
7

18
7
4
25_
91
Number of
Specimens
Positive
14
7
3
7

17
0
1
14
63
       Wells,-^l in the 1930's, concluded from his studies that



bacterial contamination of air by sewage works existed and that



organisms causing respiratory diseases could remain airborne



and viable for long periods of time.  Randall and Ledbetter89



sampled the air of an activated sludge sewage treatment unit



and found that 6 percent of all bacteria emitted by the waste



liquid were of the Klebsiella species, potential respiratory

-------
                                                             22
tract pathogens.  About 40 percent of the viable airborne


bacteria in the immediate vicinity of the activated sludge


units were of a size that permits lung penetration (5 |a or


less).  The bacterial population persisted for a considerable


time and distance (the farthest sampling point being at 100


feet); the distance was strongly dependent on the wind velocity.

                          76
       Napolitano and Rowe   sampled the air of sewage treat-


ment plants and found that in one plant, the unit discharging


most organisms was the aeration tank.  In a second plant,


the comparable units were the trickling filters.  Emitted


bacteria were found at the farthest sampling point, 150 feet


downwind of the unit.  The investigators did not attempt to


isolate pathogens per se.


       Albrecht  demonstrated that the distance traveled and


the number of bacteria found downwind of a trickling filter


were correlated directly with the wind velocity.  Jensen-^"


surmised from his studies that tuberculosis organisms could


become airborne from liquids in a sewage plant and were a


real danger to the operating and supervisory personnel of the


plant.  Dixon and McCabe^4 attempted to determine whether the


incidence of infection in sewage plant workers had increased,


but the results were inconclusive because of incomplete em-


ployee medical records.


       Spendlove10^a has studied the aerosol production in an


animal rendering plant.  He painted slurries of harmless tracer


bacteria (a spore-former and a non-spore-former) onto the

-------
                                                             23
carcasses before the rendering process began, and later col-


lected air samples at various places inside and outside the


plant as processing proceeded.  His results showed that the


rendering process in use created aerosols of viable micro-


organisms.  Both the vegetative and spore-forming tracer or-


ganisms were found in air samples taken inside the plant and at


100 feet downwind from the exhaust stack.  These findings


supported the suspicion that some of the workers in the plant


had become infected with ornithosis at an earlier date when


diseased turkeys had been processed.  Other diseases which


potentially could have been transmitted by this rendering plant


include anthrax, brucellosis, tularemia, glanders, sylvatic


plaque, Q fever, and virus equine encephalitis.  Tnis situation


was a health hazard both to the workers within the plant and


to the population in surrounding areas.


       Many microorganisms—bacteria, yeasts, and molds—are


used in industrial fermentations to produce a number of econo-


mically important materials.  The latter include butanol,


acetone, ethanol, vitamins 62 and B12,lactic acid, amylase,


dextran, diacetyl, acetic acid (vinegar), antibiotics, indus-


trial alcohols, beverage alcohols, citric acid, corticosterone,


and gibberellin, as well as dairy products such as butter,

                                    I O QD
cheese, and various fermented milks. -3'0  However, even though


huge quantities of microorganisms are involved in the production


of these materials, no information was found on these fermentations


as a source of outdoor or indoor air pollution.  Ashe  has

-------
                                                             24
stated that to his knowledge, no industry has been reported to

produce a disease in the general population through air pol-

lution by living organisms.

       Production of vast numbers of spores in periodic waves

is a characteristic of many fungi, and the retention of via-

bility is of fundamental importance, especially during pro-

longed air transport.  High temperature, radiation, and low

humidities may have an adverse effect on spores of many of the

airborne fungi.  Full sunlight is known to decrease the via-

bility of many plant pathogens.    Failure to demonstrate

high germination rate may not be from lack of viability, but

from a lack of nutrient,  '   or presence of inhibitors129

and factors still unknown.

       Murrow et al.   have summarized the most frequently

isolated molds from 41 sampling stations across the country-

No two stations had the same lists, but a basic group of

dominant genera appeared to occur.  These were the following:

                  Alternaria
                  Homodendrum
                  Aspergillus
                  Penicillium
                  Pullularia
                  Phoma
                  Trichoderma
                  Fusarium
                  Helminthosporium
                  Cryptocoecus
                  Rhodotorula

       Similar genera of fungi were observed in Tucson and
               71 Al                       30
Phoenix, Ariz.,  '^ in Albuquerque, N.Mex.   and  in Los

               103
Angeles, Calif.

-------
                                                             25
       Altman et al.  have tabulated the observations of



many investigators on dispersal parameters of fungi pathogenic



for plants.  Their tabulation is reproduced in part in Table



14 (Appendix).



       The extent to which pathogenic fungi will spread is



dependent upon the occurrence of those particular conditions—of



humidity, temperature, winds, and presence of plant host—



that favor a particular disease.  A classical example has



been described by Stakman and Harrar    in which all conditions



were favorable for wheat rust disease.  In 1935, spring was



late, and in northern Texas the rainfall was twice the normal



amount.  Rust (Puccinia graminis tritici) developed quickly.



Spores of the fungus were blown northward and encountered



favorable conditions for development in the late crops of



Kansas and Nebraska.  Furthermore, cold weather in May and



June had delayed the wheat crop in Minnesota and North and



South Dakota.  The first half of July was still wet, but hot,



and when the masses os spores were blown into these fields



from Kansas and Nebraska, wheat rust developed in epidemic



proportions.  It is estimated that 135 million bushels of



wheat were lost in Minnesota, North Dakota, and South Dakota



alone.



       Species of algae and protozoa have been reported as


                                   67 98 99
making up part of the aerial biota.  '  '   Viable samples



have been obtained under extreme environmental conditions,

-------
                                                             26
including rain, heavy snow, and fog during fall, winter, and
                     9
spring.  Brown et al.  found that the quantity of algal cells
in the air exceeded that of mold spores.  However, algal cells
have not been known to cause any infectious disease, and their
role as aeroallergens has yet to Joe definitely established.
3.3  Product Sources
       Although large quantities of microorganisms are pro-
duced as a result of various industrial fermentations, Ashe
stated in 1959 that there has been no evidence so far that
this has resulted in a health hazard to the general popula-
tion.  Except for the observations of Spendlove   a (see
Section 3.2), no other information relating to this point has
been found in the literature.
3.4  Environmental Air Concentrations
       It is not valid to present any one set of values for
the aerial microbial concentration of a given area, such as
a schoolroom or a playground.  Any count is influenced by the
temperature, meteorological conditions, vegetation, human
and animal population, and time of day, as well as by the
inability to determine all types of microorganisms by any one
sampling procedure.  With due consideration to the latter fact,
the following are some values which have been reported.  Table
3  presents the bacterial counts of several areas obtained
                         127
in New York City in 1936.    Figure 1 (Appendix) presents
mean counts of outside air obtained in Detroit for a  3-month

-------
                                                             27
               127
period in 1953.    Air samples collected during the winter



indicated a lower concentration of airborne bacterial particu-



lates than in the spring.  Hourly fluctuation in counts for



air samples collected in an open field of a nonurban area in



Georgia in 1951 is shown in Figure 2 (Appendix).  The fluctua-



tions in the number of airborne microorganisms in a surgery



room due to movement are presented in Figure 3 (Appendix).



       Wright et al.^-27a have reported the results of a pilot



study to evaluate the types and number of viable microorganisms



present in the air of an urban area such as Minneapolis-St.



Paul.  Air samples were obtained at four points (35, 70, 170,



and 500 feet) along a 500-foot television tower by means of



an Anderson sampler.  Sampling was performed at intervals over



a 6-month period, and wind, rainfall, humidity, and temperature



conditions were recorded with each sample.  The mean viable



counts were as follows:



       58 particles per ft3 (2,047 per m3) at 35 ft

       38.4 particles per ft3 (1,355 per m3) at 75 ft

       32.7 particles per ft3 (1,155 per m3) at 170 ft


       22.4 particles per ft3 (790 per m3) at 500 ft



The range of all counts observed was 3.5 particles per ft3



(123 per m3) to 141 particles per ft3 (4,977 per m3), with no



consistent relationships between the counts and any of the



meteorological parameters.  Regardless of altitude, molds con-



stitued approximately 70 percent of the total airborne micro-



flora, bacteria between 19 and 26 percent, and yeast and

-------
                                                              28
actinomycetes the remainder.  A  significant portion of the


viable microorganisms  in the air were in the particle size


range of  3 to 5  \i.


      Microbial  counts in nonurban  areas are usually rela-


tively lower than in urban  areas, and in both areas are


influenced primarily by the degree  of activity and dust in the


immediate area as well as by seasonal and  climatic conditions.




                          TABLE  3


    BACTERIA IN AIR IN NEW  YORK  CITY, JANUARY-JUNE 1936127
Location
Indoor
Schools
Subway
Theater
(nonventilated)
Theater
(ventilated)
Outdoor
Streets
Park
No. of
Samples

707
290
104
149

143
13
No. of
Bacteria
per ft3

29.6
19.2
13.2
3.1

11.2
3.0
Nn . nf Si-r^n-t-nnnnr'i rx=T -F1-.3
All
Types

0.20
0.10
0.04
0.03

0.05

Beta
Hemolytic

0.01
0.0003
0.001
0.0005

0.0001

Alpha
Hemolytic

0.18
0.085
0.38
0.26

0.45

                             QQ
       Randall and Ledbetter, ^ in sampling the air of an


activated sludge sewage treatment unit, found an increase from


about eight viable particles per cubic foot (283 particles per


cubic meter) on the upwind side to 1,170 per cubic foot (17,900


per cubic meter) on the downwind side.  Figure 4 (Appendix)


shows the decrease in numbers with distance downwind from a

               (~> J
treatment unit.

-------
                                                          29
        The number of airborne fungi changes from season to


to season, from day to day, and even from hour to hour.  Table
4 illustrates the average hourly fluctuation observed by





                                                         83,84
               84
Pathak and Pady   of Alternaria spores sampled in Manhattan,
Kansas.  Some fungi appear to have a diurnal periodicity.


One explanation offered for the latter fact is that a single


crop of spores—of Cladosporium, for example—is produced per


24-hour period, maturing at night and ready to be released


just before daylight.  Morning turbulence carrying the spores


into the air for a monitoring peak, e.g., 100 per cubic foot


(3,500 per cubic meter).  Decreasing air turbulence  later in


the day allows the spores to settle, producing a late after-

                           92
noon or early evening peak.
                          TABLE  4


             AVERAGE NUMBER OF ALTERNARIA SPORES

             AT ONE SITE  IN MANHATTAN, KANSAS84
             Time	Number per Ft3


               5 a.m.                       12

               6                             7

               7                             9

               9                            13

             11                            16

               1 p.m.                       17

               2                            13
               5                            16

               6                            19

-------
                                                              30
           Q p
       Pady   found fungus spores present in the atmosphere at


an elevation of 150 feet throughout the year at one site atop

a building in Manhattan, Kans.,  with peaks in July and August.

In summer the number varied from 50 to 700 particles per cubic

foot (1,765 to 24,700 per cubic meter), while in winter they

ranged from 5 to 20 per cubic foot (175 to 700 per cubic meter)

Cladosporium was present throughout the year, comprising the

bulk of the spores in summer.

-------
                                                                 31
4.   ABATEMENT




           The problem of abatement and control of  biological



    aerosols and their effects is a most difficult  one.   In  gen-



    eral,  knowledge is incomplete concerning the various  parameters



    of biological aerosol production,  the survivial and transmission



    of the aerosol, the sampling procedures, and other factors.



    There are further complications when air is not the only route



    by which a given pathogen is spread.  It is often difficult



    to decide just how and when some infections were acquired.  In



    addition, the quantitative nature of the dose-effect  relation-



    ship is influenced by both the host and the pathogen,  as well



    as by the possible synergistic relationships with other  pol-



    lutants.



           The abatement of some diseases,  such as  influenza,  is of



    such complexity that some researchers believe that control will



    be dependent upon individual protection by immunization.10^



    However, attempts have been made to control airborne  infections


                                                          1 9 "3
    indoors by the use of ultraviolet light.  Wells et al.



    reported success in the control of a measles epidemic in Phila-



    delphia in 1941 by irradiating the air of classrooms  with


                                       85
    ultraviolet light.  Perkins et al.,   however,  found  several



    years later that similar attempts at irradiation of class-



    room air did not reduce the incidence of measles.  The early



    success of Wells was attributed to the social structure  of the



    communities where ultraviolet light was used; apparently the

-------
                                                             32
transmission of measles took place primarily at school.  In



later studies, Wells and Holla122 and Wells121 attempted to




approach the broad problem of airborne infections on a



community-wide basis.  They attempted to irradiate with ultra-



violet light the air of public buildings—schools, churches, a



theater, clubs, certain stores, and other places where children



gathered—in Pleasantville, N.Y.  A neighboring community



served as a control.  The results after 4 years showed that the



irradiation had little effect upon the total incidence of air-



borne infections.  In another study, however, ultraviolet light



was used successfully to control influenza in a hospital build-



ing.   One building was irradiated while a similar building




was not.  No attempt was made to control the hospital staff



working in the two buildings.  After 8^ months in 1957 to 1958,



2 percent of the 209 patients in the irradiated group had con-



tracted influenza as compared to 19 percent of the 396 patients



in the control group.  Ultraviolet irradiation has also been



used successfully in special situations, such as above a surgery



table.



       The control of hospital-acquired infections, especially



staphylococcal infections, has become a problem of considerable



magnitude.  There is evidence that suggests that the inhalation



of airborne bacteria in dust has a greater quantitative effect



than inhalation of directly expelled particles in producing



disease.12 Therefore, control measures directed toward the

-------
                                                              33
suppression of dust have been employed, such as use of particle-



retaining oils on blankets and floors in hospitals.  In addition,



the use of residual disinfectants, more frequent changes of bed



coverings, and the use of different fabrics have helped control



transmission.


             10 9
       Selwyn    found that for those spreading staphylococcal



organisms, treatment of the skin with antibiotics greatly re-



duced both dispersal of staphylococci and the risks of acquisi-



tion of the organisms by new patients.  Solberg106 found the



same to be true for nasal carriers in hospital wards.  Washing



the skin with hexachlorophene-containing soaps also reduced



skin dispersal of staphylococci.



       The use of disinfectants to control undesirable micro-



organisms in hospitals and elsewhere is common.  However,



the disinfectants must be correctly used.  Table 15 in the



Appendix, from Jemski and Phillips, 4 lists some common germi-



cides and conditions for their use.



       High-speed photography has dramatically demonstrated the



value of surgical masks in reducing the number of particles



emitted during a sneeze.   However, to minimize discomfort in



wearing them and to improve retention efficiency, newer



masks are being developed and tested.  Guyton and Deker47 tested



the efficiency of masks of different designs.  One type de-



signed for resterilization and reuse had a filtering efficiency



for airborne particles (1 to 5 |j diameter) of 99 percent.  Two

-------
                                                              34
of the disposable types had an efficiency of greater than 80



percent.




       Healthy hospital personnel have been shown to be car-



riers and dispersers of staphylococci.  Control of this problem



has been accomplished either by antibiotic therapy, use of



masks, or removal of these personnel from their positions in



the hospital.



       Within recent years, a number of air-filtration devices



have become commercially available that are capable of re-



moving extremely small particles, including microorganisms.



These devices have been produced in different sizes and ef-



ficiencies.  Units as small as face masks and helmets and others



large enough to be used in air-conditioning systems are avail-



able, with efficiencies of up to 99.999 percent for removal of



submicron particles.          These filters have been used to



remove microorganisms from air in hospitals, commercial fer-



mentation plants, and other controlled environmental systems.



       In designing a filter system for a controlled environ-



ment, the relative position of the blower and filter in the



system is important to avoid leakage of unfiltered air.  Figure



5 (Appendix) shows the positioning of the blower and filter



both when the contamination is inside the room and when the



contamination is outside the room.23 To be of value in a con-



trolled environment, a filter sytem need not be 100 percent



efficient.  Table 5   derived from a mathematical model

-------
                                                             35
(Table 16, Appendix), presents microbial air concentrations



in a 500-cubic-foot room using filters of different efficien-



cies and with different microbial loadings.23 The tabulation



indicates that good reductions in microbial numbers can be



obtained even with less than 100-percent-effective filters,



especially since roughing filters generally are used in con-



junction with the higher efficiency filters.  Some of the



commercially available filters and their characteristics—



efficiency, composition, etc.—are listed in Tables 17, 18



19, 20, and 21 in the Appendix.  The ultra high-efficiency



units are capable of removing 0.1 u viral particles. °'^*



The results of one series of tests are presented in Table 21



(Appendix).



       Public health authorities have made recommendations



for the control of some diseases for which the infectious



agent can survive for extended periods of time in soil and



dust.  For example, in endemic areas of coccidioidomycosis or



histoplasmosis, dust control measures—oiling of roads and



planting of grass—should be practiced, or local areas should



be sprayed with disinfectants.  Individuals from nonendemic



areas should not be brought into endemic coccidioidomycosis



areas for work in dusty occupations, such as cotton pick-



ing or road construction.  Control of pigeons and starlings



should be attempted in areas where histoplasmosis or cryptococ-



cosis are potential hazards.  Protective masks should be worn

-------
                                                             36
                          TABLE 5

       ROOM CONTAMINATION IN ORGANISMS PER CUBIC FOOT

          AT END OF ONE HOUR AND AT STEADY STATE23
% Filter Efficiencya
30
60
90
100
Orqanisms beinq generated per minute
1,000
3.80085
(4.00000)
1.99504
(2.00000)
1.33316
(1.33333)
1.19994
(1.20000)
10,000
38.00852
(40.00000)
19.95042
(20.00000)
13.33163
(13.33333)
11.99946
(12.00000)
100,000
380.08520
(400.00000)
199.50420
(200.00000)
133.31630
(133.33333)
119.99460
(120.00000)
       Assumptions:  5,000 cubic feet in room; clean at start.
Then air changes 10 times per hour through filters.  Complete
mixing obtained at all times.
       •'-'First figure in the body of the table gives concentra-
tion in organisms per cubic foot reached at end of one hour.
The second figure, in parentheses, gives the equilibrium or
steady-state concentration.  For development of the mathematical
solution of this problem, see Table 16, Appendix.

-------
                                                             37
by persons exposed to known or potential sources of infection,



such as the cleaning or destruction of old buildings—chicken



houses, barns, and silos, for example—where starlings and



pigeons have roosted.  All articles contaminated by persons



or animals infected with blastomycosis, tuberculosis, and other



such infectious diseases, as well as their sputum, should be



disinfected prior to disposal.



       Ledbetter   has suggested that elimination of any



potential biological aerosol hazards associated with sewage



treatment units could be effected by enclosing the process



and venting the waste air through an incinerator with the



proper controls for trapping particles and gases.  The cur-



rently available devices for the control of industrial emmi-



sions are discussed in detail in the National Air Pollution



Control Administration report18 "Central Techniques for Particu-



late Air Pollutants."



       The control of mildew and other fungi on painted sur-



faces has not been very successful.    Paint formulas with



zinc, titanium, and tin have been able to retard somewhat the



growth of fungi but have not been completely inhibitory -



       The problem of food storage in recent years has been



solved successfully by the use of refrigeration.  Sulfur dioxide,



benzoates, and other preservatives have also been beneficially




employed.



       There are incidents in which abatement procedures have



been employed before the need was evident.  That is, no information

-------
                                                             38
was available beforehand as to the extent, if any, of a problem,



but abatement was attempted because of "common sense."  For



example, in one report, the requirement of counterguards for



protecting food from aerosols in cafeterias seems to have arisen



without any specific data to show the need for it.  A study



was performed to determine whether the general existing guard



designs were of any value.  The data did indicate that guards



were of value in shielding food from potential aerosols being



dispersed by the patrons.  However, it is still not known how



extensive this problem can be and whether the presently used



designs give sufficient protection.



       Research is continuing to develop fungus-resistant



varieties of crops.  For example, a rust-resistant variety of



wheat was being used in 1935 when a new fungus (race 56)



evolved which ruined the spring wheat.  New rust-resistant



varieties of wheat were used following this epidemic, but in



1953 and 1954 fungus race 15B evolved and attacked these vari-



eties.  Although even newer varieties of wheat are presently



being used that are resistant to races 56 and 15B, wheat rust



races are known that can attack these newer varieties as well.118



Fungicides—such as copper salt mixtures, sulfur powder mix-



tures, organomercurials, organoarsenicals, and organozincs—



are used extensively on crops.90 Table 22 (Appendix) presents




experimental data on the use of an eradicant fungicide.80




Warning services are available for certain diseases—potato

-------
                                                              39
blight (Phytophthora infestans) for example—to tell farmers



when they should spray with fungicides to control the spread



of a disease.  These warnings are based upon records of tem-



perature and humidity or rainfall with consideration of the age



of the crop and the susceptibility of the variety.118 In recent




years, aerial photography also has become a useful tool in the



detection and control of crop diseases.8 Sterilization or



pasteurization of the soil is used when an area has become



heavily infested with a pathogen.  Heat, although expensive,



has been and still is being used, but it is being replaced by



chemicals—chloropicrin, Vapam, Mylone, formaldehyde, D-D mix-



ture, and ethyl and methyl bromides.1^

-------
                                                                 40
5.   ECONOMICS



           Ridker94 has stated that because in many cases there



    are either insufficient or no data concerning the number of



    persons with a disease and very little information available



    concerning the cost of treatment,  the economic loss due to



    the health effects of air pollutants is most difficult to



    estimate.  The task is no less difficult with biological aero-



    sols.   One approach to the problem is to consider the incidence



    and prevalence of certain diseases.  This will at least in-



    dicate the magnitude of the problem and the relative importance



    of the diseases.



           One attempt at estimating a conservative dollar value



    for some diseases is presented in Table  6..   The partial cost



    of tuberculosis is presented in Table 23, Appendix.



           The influenza pandemic of 1918 to 1919 resulted in



    550,000 deaths in the United States alone.  It has been esti-



    mated that one-half of the world population suffered from the



    illness and that 20 million deaths occurred.  The Asian


                                                     12
    flu pandemic of 1957 affected 45 million persons.



           As reported by the United States Bureau of the Census,116



    influenza and pneumonia ranked fifth as a cause of death in



    the United States in 1966, with an average rate of 32.5 deaths



    per 100,000 population.  All other pulmonary diseases as a



    group were 10th in rank, with 14.5 deaths per 100,000 popula-



    tion (Table 24, Appendix).  In 1966, the death rate for

-------
                                   TABLE  6




          RESOURCE COSTS OF DISEASES ASSOCIATED WITH AIR POLLUTION
94


Type of
Cost
Premature
Death
Premature
Burial
Treatment
Absen-
teeism
Total
Costs Associated with Selected Diseases (Millions of Dollars)*
Cancer of
the Re-
spiratory
System

518

15
35

112
680


Chronic
Bronchitis

18

0.7
89

52
159.7


Acute
Bronchitis

6

0.2



6.2


Common
Cold




200

131
331


Pneumonia

329

13
73

75
490


Emphysema

62

2



64


Asthma

59

2
138

60
259
*Using a discount rate of 5 percent.

-------
                                                              42
 tuberculosis  of  all  forms  was  3.9,  and  that  for meningococcal



 disease  was 0.4  (Table  25,  Appendix).



       Data pertaining  to  the  number of cases of  specified



 reportable diseases  in  the United  States are presented in



 Table  26, Appendix.




       It has been estimated that  people in  the United States



 and  Great Britain  suffer from  2  to  10 acute  respiratory  ill-



 nesses each year.     The exact number of such illnesses  reported



 is dependent  upon  the age  of the person and  his environment,



 and  also on the  number  of  symptoms  and  signs each investiga-



 tor  requires  before  he  diagnoses a  respiratory illness.  The



 incidence, the number of days  of restricted  activity, and the



 number of days of  bed rest for several  respiratory diseases



 are  presented in Table  27  (Appendix).     Table 28 (Appendix)


                                                                28
 shows  the age distribution rates of certain  reportable diseases.




       The control of plant diseases is a constant problem.



 Large  epidemics  among crops have occurred in the  past.   An



 epidemic of wheat  rust  in  1925 resulted in a loss of 12  million



 bushels  of wheat,  and another  in 1935 in a loss of 135 million



 bushels.107



       No information has  been found on abatement and control



 costs  pertaining to  biological aerosols.   However, the economic



 advantages of microorganisms in  industrial fermentations are



-considerable.  In  antibiotic fermentation alone,  the broad-



 and  medium-spectrum  antibiotics  had a drugstore and hospital

-------
                                                              43
purchase cost of approximately 200 million dollars, and


penicillin a purchase cost of 50 million dollars annually

                              CO
during the years 1959 to 1964.

-------
                                                                44
6.   METHODS OF ANALYSIS




          The problems of obtaining representative samples  for



    analysis of airborne particles covering the wide range  of atmo-



    spheric conditions, biological types,  and particle size are



    such that no single procedure is adequate for all.  Therefore,



    the methods of analysis tend to be specialized for relatively



    narrow fields of study; consequently,  many different individual



    sampling devices have been -used.  The  best reviews of the sub-



    ject are by Wolf et al.,127 Gregory,46 Noble,78 and May-66



          The methods used for sampling biological aerosols are



    basically the same as the methods used to sample dust and



    other airborne particulates.  However, since the objective  is



    generally to determine the viability of collected particles,



    following collection the samples must  undergo an additional



    step:  growth in a suitable nutrient under proper environmental



    conditions, followed by observation of the growth and evaluation




    of the results.



          Since no one method of analysis  will yield information



    concerning all parameters of a sample, procedures   should  be



    chosen which will yield the information that is of greatest



    concern.  The basic methods are these:



          (1) Sedimentation:93 In this method, particulates suspended



    in the air are allowed to settle either on plain surfaces or on



    surfaces coated with a nutrient medium.  This method can yield



    information on the number of viable particles that have settled



    during the sampling time, and the total number and size of  all



    particles that settle in a given time.  Results will be influenced

-------
                                                             45
greatly by air movement and diameter of the aerosol particles.



      (2) Impingement into liquids:19•37,43,75 Aj_r ^s drawn




through a small jet and is directed against a liquid surface,



and the suspended particles are collected in the liquid.  Due



to the agitation of the particles  in the collecting liquid,



aggregates are likely to be broken up.  Therefore, the counts



obtained by this method tend to reflect the total number of



individual organisms in the air and are higher than the values



obtained by other methods.



      (3) Impaction onto solid surfaces:4'2  Air is drawn



through a small jet(s), and the particles are deposited on



dry or coated solid sufaces or on  an agar nutrient.  Samples



taken by this method have been used to determine total numbers,



size, viable numbers, and variation in numbers per unit of



time during a long sampling period.



      (4) Filtration:72'79'101'111 The particulates are



collected by passing the air through a filter, which can be



made of cellulose-asbestos paper,  glass wool, cotton, alginate



wool, gelatin foam, or membrane material.  The particulates



are washed from the filters and assayed by appropriate micro-



biological techniques.  In this method, the viability of



organisms can be detrimentally affected by dehydration in the



air stream and the results thereby biased.



      (5) Centrifugation:97'120 The particulates are pro-



pelled by centrifugal force onto the collecting surface, which



can be glass or an agar nutrient.  Size and number information



can be obtained by this method.

-------
                                                             46
       (6) Electrostatic precipitation:   Particles are



collected by drawing air at a measured rate over an electrically



charged surface of glass, liquid, or agar.  The total number



of particles or viable number is then determined.




       (7) Thermal precipitation:   Particles are collected by



means of thermal gradients.  The design is based on the princi-



ple that airborne particles are repelled by hot surfaces and



are deposited on colder surfaces by forces proportional to the



temperature gradient.  The particle size distribution can be



determined.



       Because of the great number of different aerosol samples



used by investigators, general agreement was reached at the



International Aerobiology Symposium (sponsored by the Office



of Naval Research and the University of California in October



1963) that data obtained with any specialized sampler should



be correlated with at least some results obtained with a



standard reference sampler.7 The participants at the Symposium



also agreed that the United States Army Chemical Corps all-



glass impinger (AGI 30 Impinger)127 be recommended as the



standard liquid impinger, and that the Anderson Stacked Sieve



sampler4 be recommended as the standard apparatus for impaction




on solid surfaces.

-------
                                                                47
7.   SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS




           Biological aerosols—suspensions of microorganisms in



    the air—can cause diseases of humans,  animals,  and plants,



    and degradation of inanimate materials.  The microorganisms



    generally involved are the bacteria,  fungi (yeast and molds),



    and viruses.  Bacterial and viral aerosols are detrimentally



    affected by the atmospheric environment and, therefore,  air-



    borne transmission of such diseases is  limited to short



    distances and crowded conditions.  Fungi are better adapted



    to aerial dissemination and are known to have been transmitted



    hundreds of miles from their source.



           Generally, the symptoms produced by airborne infectious



    organisms in humans and animals are those of a respiratory



    disease.  The human diseases in this  category include tuber-



    culosis, pneumonia, aspergillosis,  influenza, the common cold,



    and others.  As more data are gathered, there is increasing



    evidence that biological and nonbiological air pollutants are



    capable of producing synergistic effects.  An increase in



    the incidence of respiratory diseases has been reported  in



    metropolitan areas during occasions of  excessively high  air



    pollution.  This potential effect has been confirmed through



    the use of experimental animals in the  laboratory.  For  example,



    mice have been found to exhibit a higher mortality rate  after



    a controlled dosage of Klebsiella pneumoniae when preceded by



    exposure to ozone or nitrogen dioxide.

-------
                                                             48
       Compared to humans, relatively few diseases of animals



are spread toy airborne transmission.  Those that are include



tuberculosis, glanders, aspergillosis,  hog cholera, and New-



castle disease.




       Plants are susceptible both to specific plant pathogens



and to the indigenous saprophytic decay produced by micro-



organisms present in the soil.  Of the plant pathogens, fungi



are the most commonly transmitted by air and in the past have



been the agents for devastating epidemics.  For example, wheat



rust destroyed an estimated 135 million bushels of wheat in



1935.




       Saprophytic microorganisms are ubiquitous in nature.



Consequently, surfaces of material in contact with a humid



environment often show microbial—especially fungal—growth.



       There are no environmental standards applicable to bio-



logical aerosols at the present time.



       Sewage treatment plants have been investigated as a



source of hazardous biological aerosols.  Although potentially



pathogenic microorganisms have been isolated downwind of



sewage tanks, the full significance of this condition is not



as yet known.  Industrial fermentations with microorganisms



produce a number of economically important materials—such as



organic solvents, vitamins, and antibiotics—but no instance



has yet been reported of a disease being transmitted to the



general population as a result of any of these processes.

-------
                                                             49
       It is not valid to present any one value for the aerial



microbial concentration of a given area.  Any count is influ-



enced by the temperature, meteorological conditions, vegetation,



human and animal population, and time of day, as well as by



the inability to determine all types of microorganisms by any



one sampling procedure.  However, some data have been presented



as indicative of certain areas under noted environmental condi-



tions and sampling procedures.



       The problem of abatement and control of biological



aerosols is exceedingly difficult and complex.  Attempts have



been made to control airborne infections indoors by ultraviolet



light irradiation.  Dust control, treatment of carriers with



antibiotics, washing with disinfectant soaps, and the use of



disinfectants and surgical masks have reduced significantly the



spread of airborne disease in hospitals.  Within recent years,



a number of air filtration devices have been made commercially



available that are capable of removing extremely small parti-



cles, including microorganisms.  These devices have been



produced in different sizes and efficiencies and can be used



in air-conditioning systems.  Their full potential in the con-



trol of biological aerosols nas not as yet been realized.



       The control of outdoor airborne infections has been



limited essentially to dust control and location and elimination



of sources for specific outbreaks of certain diseases.  Progress



in the area has been hindered by lack of knowledge concerning



the outdoor transmission of airborne disease.

-------
                                                             50
      There has been no adequate way to estimate the economic



loss due to the effects of biological aerosols.  However, the



economic value of microorganisms in industrial fermentations



is considerable.



      The methods of analysis available for biological aerosols



tend to be specialized for relatively narrow fields of study,



and consequently many different individual sampling devices



have been used.  The basic methods are these:  (1) sedimentation,



(2) impingement into liquids, (3) impaction onto solid surfaces,



(4) filtration, (5) centrifugation, (6) electrostatic precipitation,



and (7) thermal precipitation.



      Based on the material presented in this report, further



studies are suggested in the following areas:



      (1) More studies are needed to delineate the characteris-



tics of biological aerosols with the goal of better under-



standing their production, survival, and dispersal in indoor



and outdoor areas.  For example, what is the relative signifi-



cance of the transmission of a disease—such as influenza—



outdoors as compared to indoors?



      (2) Further documentation of the synergistic effects of



biological and nonbiological air pollutants is warranted.



      (3) Additional information is needed on the value of up-



grading air conditioning systems with filters and ultraviolet



light in schools, office areas,  and other places for control of



biological aerosols.



      (4) Further delineation of the potential sources of



hazardous biological aerosols is necessary.

-------
                                                              51
 REFERENCES

 1.  Albrecht, C. R., Bacterial Air Pollution Associated with
     the Sewage Treatment Process, Master's Thesis, University
     of Florida (1958).

 2.  Alderson, M. R., Data on Sickness Absence in Some Recent
     Publications of the Ministry of Pensions and National
     Insurance, Brit. J. Prevent. Social Med. .21;! (1967).

 3.  Altman, P. L., et al.,  Environmental Biology, Aerospace
     Medical Research Laboratories, Wright-Patterson Air Force
     Base, Ohio (1966).

 4.  Andersen, A. A., New Sampler for the Collection, Sizing,
     and Enumeration of Viable Airborne Particles, J. Bacteriol.
     7^5:471 (1958).

 5.  Andersen, J. D., and C. S. Cox, Microbial Survival, in
     Airborne Microbes, Seventeenth Symposium of the Society for
     General Microbiology^P. H. Gregory and J.L. Monteitn,
     Eds.(Cambridge,Eng1.:  University Press, 1967).

 6.  Ashe, W. F., Exposure to High Concentrations of Air Pollution
     (I) Health Effects of Acute Episodes, Proc. Natl. Conf. on
     Air Pollution, Washington, D.C. Nov. 18-20, 1958, U.S.
     Public Health Serv. Publ. 654 (1959).

 7.  Brachman, P- S., et al., Standard Sampler for Assay of
     Airborne Microorganisms, Science 144:1295 (1964).

 8.  Brenchley, G. H., Aerial Photography for the Study of
     Potato Blight Epidemics, World Rev. Pest Control 3.:68
     (1964).

 9.  Brown, R. M., D. A. Larson, and H. C. Bold, Airborne Algae:
     Their Abundance and Heterogenicity, Science 143:583 (1964).

10.  Bruch, C. W. ,  "Microbes in the Upper Atmosphere and Beyond,"
     Airborne Microbes, Seventeenth Symposium of the Society for
     General Microbiology, P. H. Gregory and J. L. Monteith, Eds.
     (Cambridge, Engl. :  University Press, 1967).

11.  Bruner, D. W., and J. H. Gillespie, Hagen's Infectious
     Diseases of Domestic Animals, 5th ed. (Ithaca, N.Y.:
     Cornell Univ. Press, 1966).

12.  Burrows, W., Textbook of Microbiology, 19th ed. (Philadelphia
     Saunders, 1968).

13.  Casida, L. E., Jr., Industrial Microbiology (New York:
     Wiley, 1968).

-------
                                                              52
14.  Chupp, C., and A. F. Sherf, Vegetable Diseases and Their
     Control (New York:  Ronald Press Co., 1960).

15.  Coffin, D. L., and E. J. Blommer, The Influence of Cold
     on Mortality from Streptococci Following Ozone Exposure,
     J. Air Pollution Control Assoc. lj>_:523 (1965).

16.  Coffin, D. L., and E. J. Blommer, Acute Toxicity of Irradiated
     Auto Exhaust.  Its Indication by Enhancement of Mortality
     from Streptococcal Pneumonia, Arch. Environ. Health 15:
     36 (1967).

17.  Control of Communicable Diseases in Man, 10th ed. (New
     York:  American Public Health Assoc., 1965).

18.  Control Techniques for Particulate Air Pollutants, National
     Air Pollution Control Administration Publ. AP-51, U.S.
     Govt. Printing Office, Washington, B.C. (1969).

19.  Gown, W. B., T. W. Kethley, and E. L. Fincher, The Critical-
     Orifice Liquid Impinger as a Sampler for Bacterial Aerosols,
     Appl. Microbiol. 5_:118 (1957).

20.  D1 Alessio/ D. J., et al., A Starling Roost as the Source of
     Urban Epidemic Histoplasmosis in an Area of Low Incidence,
     Am. Rev, of Respirat. Diseases 92:725 (1965).

21.  Davies, R. R., and W. C. Noble, Dispersal of Bacteria on
     Desquamated Skin, Lancet 11:1295 (1962).

22.  Dawson, W. J., Plant Diseases Due to Bacteria.  (Cambridge,
     Engl. :  University Press, 1957).

23.  Decker, H. M., et al., Air Filtration of Microbial Particles,
     U.S. Public Health Serv. Publ. 953 (1962).

24.  Dixon, F. R., and L. J. McCabe,  "Health Aspects of Waste-
     water Treatment,"  J. Water Pollution Control Federation
     36.:984 (1964).

25.  Dohan, F. C., The Complexity of the Relationship Between
     Air Pollution and Respiratory Health, Proc. Natl. Conf. Air
     Poll. Washington, D. C. (1962).

26.  Douglas, J. W. B., and R. E. Waller, Air Pollution and
     Respiratory Infection in Children, Brit. J. Prevent. Social
     Med. 20:1 (1966).

-------
                                                              53
27.   DuBuy, H. G., A. Hollaender, and M. D. Lackey, A Comparative
     Study of Sampling Devices for Airborne Micro-Organisms,
     Public Health Repts. Suppl. No. 184, Washington, D.C. (1945).

28.   Duffy, E. A., and R. E. Carroll, United States Metropolitan
     Mortality 1959-1961. U.S. Public Health Serv. Publ. 999-AP-
     39 (1967).

29.   Dummer, G. W. A., C. Brunetti, and L. K. Lee, Electronic
     Equipment Design and Construction (New York:  McGraw-Hill,
     1961).

30.   Dupont, E. M., et al.,  A Survey of the Airborne Fungi in
     Albuquerque, New Mexico, Metropolitan Area, J. Allergy
     _39_:238 (1967).

31.   Dworin, M. , A Study of Atmospheric Mold Spores in Tucson/
     Arizona, Ann. Allergy 24:31 (1966).

32.   Ehrlich, R. , Effect of Nitrogen Dioxide on Resistance to
     Respiratory Infection,  Bacteriol. Rev. J30:604 (1966).

33.   Ehrlich, R., and M. C.  Henry, Chronic Toxicity of Nitrogen
     Dioxide.  I.  Effect on Resistance to Bacterial Pneumonia,
     Arch. Environ. Health 17:860 (1968).

34.   Eichenwald, H. P., O. Kotsevalov, and L. A. Fosso, The
     "Cloud-Baby"—An Example of Bacterial-Viral Interaction,
     Am. J. Diseases Children 100:161 (1960).

35.   Emmons, C. W., Prevalence of Cryptococcus neoformans in
     Pigeon Habitats, Public Health Repts.  (U.S.) 75_:362 (1960).

36.   Emmons, C. W., Isolation of Histoplasma capsulatum from Soil
     in Washington, D.C., Public Health Repts. (U.S.) 76:591
     (1961).

37.   Ferry, R. M., L. E. Farr, and M. G. Hartman, The Preparation
     and Measurement of the Concentration of Dilute Bacterial
     Aerosols, Chem. Rev. 44_:389 (1949).

38.   Frobisher, M., Fjundamentals of Microbiology, 7th ed.
     (Philadelphia:  Saunders, 1962).

39.   Fulton, J. D., Microorganisms of the Upper Atmosphere.  III.
     Relationship Between Altitude and Micropopulation, Appl.
     Microbiol. 14:237 (1966).

-------
                                                               54
40.  Gip, L.,  The Indoor Occurrence of Airborne Dermatophytes,
     Acta Derma to-Verier eol. 49_:36 (1966).

41.  Goodman,  D. H. , et al. . A Study of Airborne Fungi in the
     Phoenix,  Arizona, Metropolitan Area, J. Allergy 38:56
     (1966).

42.  Green, G. M., and E. H. Kass, Factors Influencing the
     Clearance of Bacteria by the Lung, J. Clin. Invest. 43:
     769 (1964).

43.  Greenburg, L., and J. J. Bloomfield, The Impinger Dust
     Sampling Apparatus as Used by the United States Public
     Health Service, Public Health Repts. (U.S.) 4_7:654 (1932).

44.  Greenburg, L., F. Field, J. I. Reed, and C. L. Erhardt,
     Air Pollution and Morbidity in New York City, J. Am. Med.
     Assoc. 182:159 (1962).

45.  Greenburg, L., et al., Air Pollution, Influenza, and
     Mortality in New York City, Arch. Environ. Health 15;430
     (1967).

46.  Gregory,  P. H., The Microbiology of the Atmosphere, (New
     York:  Interscience, 1961).

47-  Guyton, H. G., and H. M. Decker, Respiratory Protection
     Provided by Five New Contagion Masks, Appl. Microbiol. 1_1;
     66  (1963).

48.  Harstad,  J. B., et al., Air Filtration of Submicron Virus
     Aerosols, Am. J. Public Health 57;2186 (1967).

49.  Henry, M. C., R. Ehrlich, and W. H. Blair, Effect of Nitrogen
     Dioxide on Resistance of Squirrel Monkeys to Klebsiella
     pneumoniae Infection, Arch. Environ. Health 18:580 (1969).

50.  Hirst, J. M., and G. W. Hurst, Long Distance Spore Trans-
     port,  in Airborne Microbes, Seventeenth Symposium of the
     Society for General Microbiology, P. H. Gregory and J. L.
     Monteith, Eds. (Cambridge, Engl.:  University Press, 1967).

51.  Hornick,  R. B., Viral Infections of the Respiratory System,
     Arch. Environ. Health 14:21 (1967).

52.  Jackson,  R. M. , Fungistasis as a Factor in the Rhizosphere
     Phenomenon, Nature 180:96 (1957).

-------
                                                             55
53.  Jacobson, A. R. , "Viable Particles in the Air," in Air
     Pollution, vol. I,  2nd ed., A. C. Stern, Ed. (New York:
     Academic Preso, p.  419, 1968).

54.  Jemski, J. V., and G. B. Phillips, Aerosol Challenge of
     Animals, T. M. 144, U.S. Army Biological Lab.,  Fort
     Datrick, Md. (1964).

55.  Jennison, M. W. , "Atomizing of Mouth and Nose Secretions
     into the Air as Revealed by High Speed Photography," in
     Aerobiology, American Assoication for the Advancement of
     Science Publ. No. 17 (1942).

56.  Jensen, K. E., Presence and Destruction of Tubercle Bacilli
     in Sewage, Bull. World Health Organ. 10.: 171 (1954).

57.  Kethley, T. W., M.  T. Gordon, and C. Orr, Jr.,  A Thermal
     Precipitator for Aerobacteriology. Science 116;368 (1946).

58.  Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, vol. 14
     (New York:  Wiley,  1967).

59.  Kraemer, H. P., and H. F. Johnstone, Collection of Aerosol
     Particles in Presence of Electrostatic Fields,  Ind. Eng.
     Chem. 4_7.:2426  (1955).

60.  Larsen, R. I., Air Pollution Damage to Paint, Am. Paint J.
     42:94 (1957).

61.  Laurenzi, G. A., J. J. Guarneri, and R. B. Endriga,
     Important Determination in Pulmonary Resistance to Bac-
     terial Infection, Med. Thorac. J22_:48 (1965).

62.  Ledbetter, J. O., Air Pollution from Wastewater Treatment,
     Water Sewage Works 113:43 (1966).

63.  Lunn, J. E., J. Knowelden, and A. J. Handyside, Patterns of
     Respiratory Illness in Sheffield Infant Schoolchildren,
     Brit. J. Prevent. Social Med. 21:7 (1967).

64.  Luoto, L., and R. J. Huebner, Q Fever Studies in Southern
     California.  IX.  Isolation of Q Fever Organisms from
     Parturient Placentas of Naturally Infected Dairy Cows, Public
     Health Repts. (U.S. ) 65_:541 (1950).

65.  Martin, A. E., and W. H. Bradley, Mortality, Fog, and
     Atmospheric Pollution, Month. Bull. Minist. Health Lab.
     Serv. 19_:56 (1960).

-------
                                                              56
66.   May, K. R.,  "Physical Aspects of Sampling Airborne Microbes,"
     in Airborne Microbes, Seventeenth Symposium of the Society
     for General Microbiology, P- H. Gregory and J. L. Monteith,
     Eds. (Cambridge, Engl.:  University Press, 1967).

67-   McGovern, J. P., T. J. Haywood, and T. R. McElhenny, Air-
     borne Algae and Their Allergenicity-   II.  Clinical and
     Laboratory Multiple Correlation Studies with Four Genera,
     Ann. Allergy 24;146 (1966).

68.   McKinley, T. W. , W. C. Henning, and F. B. Hendrix, Effective-
     ness of Counter Guards in Preventing Microbial Contamination,
     J. Environ. Health 31:232 (1968).

69.   Merchant, I. A., and R. A. Packer,- Veterinary Bacteriology
     and Virology, 6th ed. (Ames, Iowa:  Iowa State University
     Press, 1961).

70.   Merck Veterinary Manual, 3rd ed. (Rahway, N.J.:  Merck,
     1967).

71.   Miller, S., and R. Ehrlich, Susceptibility to Respiratory
     Infections of Animals Exposed to Ozone.  I.  Susceptibility
     to Klebsiella pneumoniae, J. Infect.  Diseases 103:145
     (1958).

72.   Mitchell, R. B., J. D. Fulton, and H. V. Ellingston, A
     Soluble Gelatin Foam Sampler for Airborne Micro-Organisms
     at Surface Levels, Am. J. Public Health 44:1334 (1954).

73.   Morbidity and Mortality During the London Fog of December
     1952, Reports of Public Health Medical Service No. 95
     (London:  Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 1954).

74.   Morrow, M. B., G. H. Meyer, and H. E. Prince, A Summary
     of Airborne Mold Surveys, Ann. Allergy 22:575 (1964).

75.   Moulton, S., T. T. Puck, and H. M. Lemon, An Apparatus for
     Determination of the Bacterial Content of Air, Science
     92:51  (1943).

76.   Napolitano, P- J., and D. R. Rowe, Microbial Content of
     Air Near Sewage Treatment Plants, Water Sewage Works 113;
     480 (1966).

77.   Noble, W. C., The Dispersal of Staphylococci in Hospital
     Wards, J. Clin. Pathol. J-5_:552 (1962).

-------
                                                             57
78.  Noble, W. C., "Sampling Airborne Microbes—Handling the
     Catch," in Airborne Microbes, Seventeenth Symposium of the
     Society for General Microbiology, P- H. Gregory and J. L.
     Monteith, Eds. (Cambridge, Engl.:  University Press, 1967).

79.  Noller, E., and J. C. Spendlove, An Appraisal of the Soluble
     Gelatin Foam Filter as a Sampler for Bacterial Aerosols,
     Appl. Microbiol. 4_:300 (1956).

80.  Ogawa, J. M., D. H. Hall, and P. A. Koepsell, "Spread of
     Pathogens Within Crops as Affected by Life Cycle and Environ-
     ment, " in Airborne Microbes, Seventeenth Symposium of the
     Society for General Microbiology, P. H. Gregory and J. L.
     Monteith, Eds. (Cambridge, Engl.:  University Press, 1967).

81.  Padwick, F. W. , Notes on the Limitation of Infection of
     Wheat by Ascospores of Ophiobolus graminis Sacc.  A Possible
     Explanation, Ann. Appl. Biol. 27_:823 (1939).

82.  Pady, S. M. , Quantitative Studies of Fungus Spores in the
     Air, Mycologia 49;339 (1957).

83.  Pady, S. M., C. L. Kramer, and R. Clary, Diurnal Periodicity
     in Airborne Fungi in an Orchard, J. Allergy 39:302 (1967).

84.  Pathak, V- K., and S. M. Pady, Numbers and Viability of
     Certain Airborne Fungus Spores,  Mycologia J57:301 (1965).

85.  Perkins, J. E., A. M. Bahlke, and H. F. Silverman,  Effect
     of Ultra-violet Irradiation of Classrooms on Spread of
     Measles in Large Rural Central Schools, Am. J. Public
     Health 37:529 (1947).

86.  Procknow, J. J. , Pulmonary Histoplasmosis in a Farm Family—
     Fifteen Years Later, Am. Rev. Respirat. Diseases 95 ;171
     (1967).

87.  Public Health Laboratory Service, Laboratory Evidence of
     Influenza in England and Wales During the Winter of 1952-3,
     Brit. Med. J. 2.:1178 (1953)-

88.  Purvis, M. R., S. Miller, and R. Ehrlich, Effect of Atmo-
     spheric Pollutants on Susceptibility to Respiratory Infection,
     J. Infect. Diseases 109:238 (1961).

89.  Randall, C. W., and J. O. Ledbetter, Bacterial Air Pollution
     from Activated Sludge Units, Am. Indust. Hygiene Assoc. J.
     27:506 (1966).

-------
                                                               58
 90.   Rangaswami, G., Agriculture Microbiology (London:  Asia
      Publishing House, 1966).

 91.   Rhodes, A.. J. , and C. E. Van Rooyen, Textbook of Virology,
      5th ed. (Baltimore:  Williams and Wilkens,  1968).

 92.   Rich, S.,  and P- E. Waggoner, Atmospheric Concentration
      of Cladosporium Spores, Science 137:962 (1962).

 93.   Richardson, J. F.,  and E. R. Wooding, The Use of Sedimentation
      Cell in the Sampling of Aerosols, Chem. Eng. Sci. 4:26
      (1955).

 94.   Ridker, R. G., Economic Costs of Air Pollution.  Studies in
      Measurement  (New York!Praeger, 1968).

 95.   Riley, R.  L., and F. o'Grady, Airborne Infection, Trans-
      mission and Control  (New York:  MacMillan Co., 1961).

 96.   Rubbo, S.  J., and J. Saunders, Liberation of Organisms from
      Contaminated Textile, J. Hyg. ^1:507 (1963).

 97.   Sawyer, K. F., and W. H. Walton, The Conifuge—A Size
      Separating Sampling Device for Airborne Particle, J. Sci.
      Instr. 22:272  (1950).

 98.   Schlichting, H. E., Jr., Viable Species of Algae and Protozoa
      in the Atmosphere,  Lloydia 24:81 (1961).

 99.   Schlichting, H. E., Jr., Meteorological Conditions Affecting
      the Dispersal of Airborne Algae and Protozoa, Lloydia 27 ;64
      (1964).

100.   Schwegmann, J. C.,  "National Phenomenon in Air Pollution,"
      Presented at the 56th Annual Meeting of the Air Pollution
      Control Association, Detroit, Mich. (1963).

101.   Sehl, F. W., and B. J. Havens, Jr., A Modified Air Sampler
      Employing  Fiber Glass, A.M.A. Arch. Indust. Hvg. Occupational
      Med. 3_:98  (1951).

102.   Selwyn, S., Cross-Infection in Dermatological Wards, J.
      Hyg. 6,3:59 (1965).

103.   Shapiro, R. S., B.  C. Eisenberg, and W. Binder, Airborne
      Fungi in Los Angeles, California, J. Allergy 3_6_:472 (1965).

104.   Shooter, R. A., M.  A. Smith, and C. J. W. Hunter, A Study
      of Surgical Masks,  Brit. J. Surq. 47_:246 (1959).

-------
                                                               59
 105.   Smith,  D.  T.,  N.  F.  Conant,  and H.  P-  Willett,  Zinsser
       Microbiology.  14th ed.  (New York:   Appleton-Century-
       Crofts, 1963).

 106.   Solberg,  C.  O.,  A Study of Carriers of Staphylocoecus aureus,
       Act a Mad.  Scand.  178fSuppl.  436:1  (1965).

106a.   Spendlove, J.  C., Production of Bacterial  Aerosols in a
       Rendering Plant Process, Public Health Repts. (U.S.) 72:176
       (1957).

 107.   Stakman,  E.  C.,  and J.  G. Harrar,  Principles of Plant Pathol-
       ogy (New York:  Ronald Press, 1957).

 108.   Stuart-Harris, C. H.,  The Present  Status of the Respiratory
       Viruses and Acute Respiratory Disease in Man, Israel J.
       Mad. Sci.  .2:255 (1966).

 109.   Tacquet,  A., et al.,  Erapoussierage Pulmonaire et Infection
       Experimentale par Mycobacterium Kansasii.   1.  Influence des
       Poussieres Inertes et de differentes doses infectantes,
       Pathol. Biol.  Semaine Hop. JL4_:781  (1966).

 110.   Thienes,  C.  H.,  et al., Effects of Ozone on Experimental
       Tuberculosis and on Natural Pulmonary Infections in Mice,
       Am. Ind.  Hyg.  J.  .26:255 (1965).

 111.   Thomas, D. J., Fibrous Filters for Fine Particle Filtration,
       J.  Inst.  Heating Ventitating Enqrs. 2£:35  (1952).

 112.   Thompson,  L. R. ,  Microbiology and  Epidemiology (Philadelphia:
       Saunders,  1962).

 113.   Tiggert,  W.  D.,  A. S.  Benenson, and W. S.  Gochenour,
       Airborne Q Fever, Symposium:  Conference on Airborne
       Infection, Bacteriol.  Rev. 25_:285  (1961).

 114.   Topley, W. W.  C., and G. S.  Wilson, Principles of Bacteriology
       and Immunity,  5th ed.  (Baltimore:   Williams and Wilkens
       Co., 1964).

 115.   Tyrrell,  D.  A. J., The Spread of Viruses of the Respiratory
       Tract by the Airborne Route, in Airborne Microbes, Seventeenth
       Symposium of the Society for General Microbiology, P- H.
       Gregory and J. L. Monteith,  Eds. (Cambridge, Engl.:  Uni-
       versity Press, 1967).

 116.   U.S. Bureau of the Census, Statistical Abstract of the
       United States:  1968,  89th ed., Washington, B.C. (1968).

-------
                                                                60
 117.  U.S.  National Center for Health Statistics,  U.S.  Public
      Health Serv.  1000-Series 10-No. 43 (1968).

 118.  Van der Plank,  J.  E.,  "Spread of Plant Pathogens," in
      Airborne Microbes,  Seventeenth Symposium of  the Society
      for General Microbiology,  P.  H. Gregory and  J.  L.  Monteith,
      Eds.  (Cambridge,  Engl. :   University Press,  1967).

 119-  Washam, C.  J.,  et al..  Evaluation of Filters for Removal of
      Bacteriophages from Air, Appl. Microbiol.  14_:497 (1966).

 120.  Wells, W.. F., Apparatus for Study of Bacterial  Behavior
      of Air, Am. J.  Public Health 23;58 (1933).

 121.  Wells, W. F., Airborne Contagion and Air Hygiene (Cambridge,
      Mass.:  Harvard University Press, 1955).

 122.  Wells, M. W., and W. A.  Holla, Ventilation  in the Flow of
      Measles and Chickenpox Through a Community,  J.  Am. Med.
      Assoc. 142:1337 (1950).

 123.  Wells, W. F., M.  W. Wells, and T. S. Wilder, The Environ-
      mental Control of Epidemic Contagion, I. An Epidemiologi-
      cal Study of Radiant Disinfection of Air in  Day Schools,
      Am. J. Hyg. 3j5:97 (1942).

 124.  Westcott, C., Plant Disease Handbook (Princeton,  N.J.:
      D. Van Nostrand,  1960).

 125.  Wilkoff, L. J., L. Westbrook, and G. J. Dixon,  Factors
      Affecting the Persistence of Staphylocoecus  aureaus on
      Fabrics, Appl.  Microbiol. 17_: 268 (1969).

 126.  Williams, R.  E. O., Healthy Carriage of Staphylocoecus
      aureus.  Its Prevalance and Importance, Bacteriol. Rev.
      .27:56 (1963).

 127.  Wolf, H. W.,  et al., Sampling Microbiological Aerosols.
      U.S.  Public Health Monograph No. 60, Washington,  D.C.
       (1959).

127a.  Wright, T.  J.,  V.  W. Greene,  and H. J. Paulus,  Viable
      Microorganisms in an Urban Atmosphere, J. Air Pollution
      Control Assoc.  I9_:337 (1969).

 128.  Yarwood, C. E., Simultaneous Self-Stimulation and Self-
      Inhibition of Uredospore Germination, Mycologia 48:20
      (1956).

 129.  Yarwood, C. E., "Epidemiology of Plant Diseases," in
      Plant Pathology;   Problems and Progress. 1909-1953
      (Madison:University of Wisconsin Press,  1959).

-------
APPENDIX

-------
                                                                                    62
  30-|
  25-
O  20-
   151
QC
£
O
     23 2425(5 6'9 'lOn'l^ls'ieVls'lds 9 •\d'\3'\4i\51617202'\222324272829'30 4'5 '? '8 '11'121415'18'19'20
      Feb.
                   Mar.
                                              Apr.
 May
                                      DAY SAMPLE COLLECTED
 'NOTE:  Extramural, sieve sampler, heart infusion agar with 5 percent blood added, 37°C incubation for 48 hours, Feb.-May
                                         1953, Detroit, Mich.
                                          FIGURE 1
                    Daily  Bacterial  Counts  in  Urban  Area
                                                                         127
                         6 -|
                              . .   -i—i—n—i—i
                            12  2  4   6   8  10  12  2  4  6   8   10  12
                            N         PM        M        AM        N
                                             TIME
 •NOTE:  Extramural, sieve sampler, heart infusion agar with 5 percent blood added, 37°C incubation for 24 hours, June 27-
                              July 3, 1951, Oatland Island, Savannah, Ga.
                                         FIGURE  2

                Hourly Bacterial  Counts  in  Nonurban  Area
127

-------
 o
n
o
o
0)
V
u
(O
00
     70-,
     50-
     30-
     10-
            20
60
100
 min.
140
180
          1 -  1st patient in
          2 -  2nd patient in
          3 -  Patient rolled over by 5 people
          4 -  Table moved by 5 people
          5    Patient moved on table
          6    Patient rolled back
          7    3rd patient in
                         FIGURE  3
        Airborne  Organisms  in a  Surgery Room
                                                     22

-------
     30-
                                         O Nutrient Agar
                                         ® Emb Agar
                                         • Coliforms
8
2.
©
o
"5
d
20-
     10-
                                       60
                          Distance Downwind (ft)
                                 FIGURE  4
           Effect of  Distance  Downwind of Treatment Unit

-------
                                                                     65
                      A. Contamination Within Room
                 Inside Pressure Should Be Lower Than Outside
                      B. Contamination Outside Room
                 Inside Pressure Should Be Greater Than Outside
                           FIGURE 5
Relative  Position of Filter and Blower to  Confine
      Contamination  Inside or Outside Room

-------
APPENDIX
                                          TABLE 7

         COMMDN AIRBORNE  BACTERIAL  INFECTIONS OF HUMANS12'17'38/95'105'112'114
 Disease
        Causative Agent
      Symptoms and Remarks
 Pulmonary  tuberculosis
Mycnbacterium tuberculosis
Lesions caused by nodules or tuber-
cles are found in the lungs (or
other parts of the body).  In some
cases calcification of the nodules
takes place, and in others there
is a coalescence of the necrotic
tissue
 Pulmonary  anthrax
Bacillus anthracis
Primarily a disease of animals but
also occurs in man.  This is the
most dangerous, although not the
most common, of the three forms of
anthrax.  It is characterized by
many of the symptoms of pneumonia
and often progresses into fatal
septicemia
Staphylococcal
   respiratory  infection
Staphylocoecus aureus
Can result in a gradual cavitating
pneumonia or a fulminating hemor-
rhagic pneumonia
 Streptococcal
    respiratory  infection
Streptococcus pyogenes
May develop into any of a variety
of symptoms, including tonsillitis,
sinusitis, otitis media, broncho-
pneumonia, pharyngitis, or septic
sore throat, and becomes scarlet
fever if the infecting strain pro-
duces erythrogenic toxin
                                                                               (continued)

-------
APPENDIX
                                  TABLE 7 (Continued)

                        COMMON AIRBORNE BACTERIAL INFECTIONS OF HUMANS
Disease
        Causative Agent
        Symptoms and Remarks
Meningococcal
  infection
Neisseria meningitidis
Probably becomes established
initially in the nasopharynx
but clinically develops into a
cerebrospinal meningitis
Pneumococcal pneumonia
Diplococcus pneumoniae
Clinically is nearly always lobar
pneumonia.  However, the infec-
tion may migrate through the nasal
passages or be distributed via the
vascular system to various parts
of the body and give rise to
localized foci of infection.
Death is due to overwhelming inter-
ference with respiration or to
general systemic toxemia
Pneumonic plague
Pasteurella pestis
Although ordinarily spread by the
bite of fleas, it can occur
secondary to glandular plague and
give rise to a primary pulmonary
form transmitted from man to man;
usually fatal
                                                                                   (contined)

-------
APPENDIX
                                  TABLE 7 (Continued)

                   COMMON AIRBORNE BACTERIAL INFECTIONS OF HUMANS
Disease
        Causative Agent
        Symptoms and Remarks
Whooping cough
Bordetella pertussis
Usually a childhood disease which
begins with a catarrhal stage of
a mild cough that progresses in
severity to a paroxysmal stage
characterized by rapid consecutive
coughs and the deep inspiratory
whoop.  In the convalescent stage,
the number and frequency of parox-
ysms gradually decrease
Diphtheria
Corvnebacterium
  diphtheriae
A childhood disease, usually a
local infection of the mucous
surfaces.  The pharynx is most
commonly affected, but infection
of the larynx, or membranous croup,
and nasal diphtheria are not
infrequently observed.  Primary
infection of the lungs and other
parts of the body have been
reported
Klebsiella
  pulmonary infection
Klebsiella pneumoniae
Produces necrotic lesions of the
lung parenchyma and usually is
fatal if not treated
                                                                                   (continued)
                                                                                                03

-------
APPENDIX
                                   TABLE 7 (Continued)

                   COMJVDN AIRBORNE BACTERIAL INFECTIONS OP HUMANS
 Disease
        Causative Agent
        Symptoms and Remarks
 Staphylococcal wound
    infection
Staphvlocoecus aureus
Those surgical wounds which be-
come infected by bacteria
settling from air in the surgery
room.  These organisms may be
derived from the surgical team
or may be carried into the oper-
ting room by air currents

-------
APPENDIX
                                         TABLE  8

           COMMDN AIRBORNE FUNGAL  INFECTIONS OF HUMANS12'17'38'95'105'112'114
 Disease
        Causative Agent
        Symptoms and Remarks
 Blastomycosis
Blastomyces dermatitidis
A chronic granulomatous mycosis
clinically resembling tuberculosis
with coughing, pain in the chest,
and weakness
 Co cc id io idomy co s i s
Coccidioides immitis
Varies in severity in recognized
primary cases from that of a
common cold to cases resembling
influenza.  Many cases are symp-
tomless.  The secondary or pro-
gressive coccidioidomycosis
results in cutaneous, subcutan-
eous, visceral, and osseous lesions
with a high fatality rate
 Cryptococcosis
Cryptocoecus neoformans
                                                             More commonly is a generalized
                                                             infection,  but can also be a
                                                             primary (or secondary) lung in-
                                                             fection.   It may spread from the
                                                             lungs as  well
 Histoplasmosis
Histoplasma capsulatum
A systemic mycosis of varying
severity, with the primary lesion
usually in the lungs.  Clinical
symptoms of the systemic form can
resemble many other diseases
(anemia, leukopenia, Hodgkin's
disease, etc.)
                                                                                 (continued)

-------
APPENDIX
                                  TABLE  8  (Continued)

                     COMMON AIRBORNE FUNGAL INFECTIONS OF HUMANS
Disease
        Causative Agent
        Symptoms and Remarks
Nocardiosis
Nocardia asteroides
A chronic disease resembling
tuberculosis, often initiated in
the lungs but sometimes pro-
gressing to a systemic infec-
tion
Aspergillosis
Aspergillosis fumigatus
A chronic pulmonary mycosis
similar to and sometimes mis-
taken for tuberculosis.  The in-
fection may be secondary, parti-
cularly to tuberculosis.  Pul-
monary infection results from
inhalation of airborne spores
Sporotrichosis
Sporotichum schenckii
A nodular skin infection ulti-
mately forming a necrotic ulcer.
Transmission by inhalation of
spores is rare
                                                                                                -a

-------
APPENDIX
                                                 TABLE 9

       VIRAL AND RELATED AGENTS  PRESENTLY RECOGNIZED  AS  THE CAUSE OF HUMAN RESPIRATORY DISEASES
                                                                          51
Group_
 Number Serotypes
     Causing          Serotype
Respiratory Illness	Name
                  Types of Clinical
                  Syndromes Produced
                          Comments
 1.  Myxoviruses
                      Influenza A
                                             Influenza B
                                             Influenza C

                                             Respiratory
                                             Syncytial (RS)
                  Influenza/  febrile    Causes influenza
                  pharyngitis or        in persons of
                  tonsillitis,          all ages
                  common cold, croup,
                  bronchitis,  bron-
                  chiolitis,
                  pneumonia

                  Bronchiolitis         Most common cause
                  (infants),  pneumonia,  of bronchiolitis
                  bronchitis, common    in children
                  cold,  croup
                                             Parainfluenza
                                        Croup (infants),
                                        bron ch i t i s, common
                                        cold, pneumonia,
                                        bronchiolitis
                                        Type 1 is the
                                        most important
                                        agent in the
                                        croup syndrome
 2.  Adenoviruses
         8
1, 2, 3,  4, 5,
7, 4, 21
Bronchitis, common
cold, pneumonia,
brochiolitis,  febrile
sore throat
                                                                                       (continued)
                                                                                                      vJ

-------
APPENDIX
                                            TABLE  9  (Continued)

       VIRAL AND RELATED AGENTS  PRESENTLY RECOGNIZED AS  THE  CAUSE  OF HUMAN RESPIRATORY DISEASES
Group
 Number Serotypes
     Causing          Serotype
Respiratory Illness	Name
Types of Clinical
Syndromes Produced
    Comments
 3.  Picornaviruses
                                60+
                      Coxsackie A
                      (2, 3, 5, 6,
                      8, 10, 21)

                      Coxsackie B
                      (2, 3, 5)
                      Rhinoviruses
Febrile sore throat,
common cold
Febrile sore throat,
common cold,
pleurodynia

Common cold, bron-
chitis, pneumonia
Most frequently
isolated viruses
in adults with
upper respiratory
infections
                                             ECHO (11,  20)
                                        Febrile  sore throat,
                                        common cold, croup
3a.
4.
Reoviruses
( classification
uncertain )
Herpesviruses
3
3
1
Reovirus
(ECHO-10)
Herpes
Varicella
Minor respiratory
symptoms and diar-
rhea (children)
Pharyngitis ( adults )
Pneumonia
                                                                                         (continued)

-------
APPENDIX
                                           TABLE  9 (Continued)

       VIRAL AND RELATED AGENTS PRESENTLY RECOGNIZED AS THE CAUSE OF HUMAN  RESPIRATORY DISEASES
Group
                       Number Sero types
                           Causing          Sero type
                      Respiratory Illness     Name
                                                              Types of Clinical
                                                              Syndromes Produced
                                                                                        Comments
5.  Chlamydozoaceae*
                                            Psittacosis
                                                              Psittacosis,  pneumonia
6.  Mycoplasmataceae
                                            Mycoplasma
                                             pneumoniae
                                                              Pneumonia (Eaton  agent),
                                                              bronchitis,  bron-
                                                              chiolitis, minor  upper
                                                              respiratory  illness
7.   Rickettsiae
                                            Coxiella
                                               burnetii
                                               (Q fever)
                                                              Pneumonia
         *Not  a  true  virus; nucleic acid core contains both RNA and DNA.

-------
APPENDIX
                                                TABLE 10

                           POSSIBLE AIRBORNE VIRUS DISEASES OF ANIMALS11'69'70
Disease
    Host
 Symptoms and Effects
 Morbidity and
   Mortality
   Control
Hog  cholera
Swine
Fever, stilted gait,
conjunctivitis, diarrhea
As high as 90%
mortality
Immunization
Equine  influenza
Horse
Fever, nasal discharge,
abortion in mares
Low mortality
Immunization
Swine influenza
Swine
Exudative bronchitis
Morbidity almost  None
100%, mortality
2% or less
Feline
Canine
distemper
distemper
Newcastle disease
Cat, mink,
raccoon
Dog, fox,
mink
Chicken,
turkey, ducks,
other fowl
Vomiting, diarrhea,
nasal and eye discharge
Fever, diarrhea,
rhinitis
Coughing , sneezing ,
paralysis of legs, loss
of egg production
Recovery usual
Recovery usual
Morbidity 100%,
mortality 5-50%
Immun i z a t ion
Immunization
Immunization
Infectious bronchitis
Chicken
Rales, wheezing, loss
of egg production
Mortality up to
60% in chicks,
neglible in
older birds
Immunization

-------
                                                                 76
APPENDIX





                                  TABLE 11




 COMMON LABORATORY ANIMALS USED IN STUDIES OF AIRBORNE DISEASE1'54'114
Disease
Pulmonary tuberculosis
Pulmonary anthrax
Staphylococcal respiratory
infection
Streptococcal respiratory
infection
Meningococcal infection*
Pneumococcal pneumonia
Pneumonic plague
Whooping cough
Diphtheria
Pulmonary Klebsiella infection
Staphylococcal wound
infections
Aspergillosis
Blastomycosis
Co cc id io idomy cosis
Crypto co ecus
Histoplasmosis
Nocardiosis
Laboratory Animal
Mouse
X
X

X

X

X

X
X

X
X
X
X
Guinea
Pig
X
X

X

X
X
X
X
X
X

X
X

X
X
Rabbit
X
X
X
X

X

X

X
X
X

X

X
-p
(0
tf










X




X
Monkey
X
X




X



X


X


-P

-------
                                                                77
APPENDIX

                              TABLE 12

    AVERAGE MICROPOPULATION PER CUBIC METER FOUND SIMULTANEOUSLY
                    DURING 30-HOUR SAMPLING MISSION39
                    	Time	
Altitude (meters)   0600-1200   1200-1800   1800-2400    0000-0600

  690                  45           250          200          90

1,600                  25           65           75          50

3,127                  23           30           35          15
                              TABLE 13

             QUANTITATIVE RESULTS FROM  THE  BALLOON-BORNE
                        DIRECT-FLOW SAMPLERS10
                 Altitude               Average Volume
             (thousand feet)	(ft3  air/microbe)

                 10-30                       50-100

                 30-60                      330-500

                 60-90                       2'000

-------
TABLE 14.  AIR DISPERSION OF SMALL ORGANISMS
Disease
(Organism)
(Airborne spores)
Beet downy mildew
(Peronospora sp.)
Blossom infection
(Sclerotinia laxa)
(Bovista plumbea)
Cedar and apple
rust (Gymnosporan-
g-jum sp0 )
Chestnut blight
(Endothia para-
silica)
Crown rust of oats
(Puccinia
coronata)
Downy mildew
( Pseudoperonospora
humuli)
Leaf spots on
tulips
Loose smut of
wheat (Ustilago
tritici)
Maize rust
(Puccinia sorahi)

Onion mildew
(Peronospora
destructor)
Means of
Dispersion
Wind
Wind
Air currents
Air currents
Air currents
Air currents
Wind
Air currents
Raindrop splash
and wind
Air currents
Wind
Air currents
Distances and Units Dispersed
(Horizontal Dispersion)
Degrees north of equator
Fungus colonies on plate
Meters from seed plants
Plants injured, %
Feet from center of
nearest source row
Blossom infection, %
Meters from release
point
Spores caught
Yards from infected
trees
Leaf infections
Feet from spore source
Ascospores found
Feet from inoculum
source
Infections, %
Feet from spore source
Leaves infected, %
Centimeters from
conidia source
Lesions/plant
Meters from spore
source
Smutted heads
Kilometers from spore
source
Plants attacked, %
Feet from onion sets
Lesions/100-ft row
57°30'
3.61
10
28
22
55.7
5
912
0
64
27
23
3
92.9
10
26
I5o2
31.6
2
241
0.5
100
120
1,138
64°20'
0.49
150
8
44
39.1
10
323
55
40
85
11
5
53.4
50
16
34.6
20.1
4
234
205
3
780
98
68°55'
0.48
1,000
1
66
29.3
15
165
110
33
180
8
7.7
35
100
12
5800
1209
24
114
4.5
0.3
1,750
1
71°5'
0.72

68
22.4
20
102
220
26
266
8
10.3
19.5
200
7
79.8
8.5
80
0
6.5
0
2,000
0




440
19

13
0.7
400
3
102.0
Sol



                                                                              CO
                                                                 (continued)

-------
TABLE   14.     AIR   DISPERSION  OF  SMALL   ORGANISMS   (Continued)
Disease
(Organism)
Potato late blight
( Phvtophthora
infestans)
Powdery mildew on
barley
( Erys iphe
qraminis)
Stem rust
(Puce in ia
_qraminj-JL)
Stem rust on rye
(P. qraminis
secalis)
(Tilletia tritici)

Tobacco blue mold
(Peronospora
tabacina)
Wheat stem rust
(Puce in ia
qraminis)
White pine blister
rust (.Gronartium
ribicola)
Means of
Dispersion
Wind
Wind
Wind
Wind
Air currents
Wind
Air currents
Air currents
Distances and Units Dispe]
(Horizontal Dispersion
Centimeters from edge
of infective group
Plants infected, %
Meters from source
Plants affected, %
Feet from barberry
hedge
Grass infected, %
Meters from source plant
g/100 ears
Meters from release
point
Spores cauqht
Yards from source
Plant lesions/1,000
in3 of field
Miles from known source
Spores collected
Feet from gooseberry
bush
Diseased trees , %
30
89
1.5
99
15
100
50
47.6
5
800
0
140
200
13,092
50
75
90
63
3.5
84
125
41
300
92.3
10
168
4
8
360
10,768
150
55
rsed
150
43
5.5
76
225
5
1,000
122.3
15
49
8
1
580
8,883
350
40
(Vertical Dispersion)
Azalea flower spot
(Ovulinia azaleae)
Onion mildew
(Peronospora
destructor)
Air currents
Air currents
Inches above ground
Infections
Altitude, feet
Spores/ft3 air
4
42
100
32
10
28
200
102
18
17
700
451
210
22
7.5
70
325
1
3,000
149.7
20
30
12
0.5
740
7,920
450
36
270
5
8.5
68
425
0.5



940
6,975
650
29

48
0
1,200
801


(continued)'

-------
APPENDIX
                            TABLE  14-  AIR DISPERSION OF SMALL ORGANISMS (Continued)
Disease
(Orqanism)
Wheat stem rust
(Puce in ia
graminis)
Means of
Dispersion
Air currents
Distances and Units Dispersed
(Vertical Dispersion)
Feet above barberry
bushes
Aeciospores caught
Altitude, feet
Urediospores
Elevation, meters
Spore s/cm2 /min
1,000
19
1,000
48,200
30
1,458
2,000
14
5,000
7,730
400
490
7,000
5
10,000
144
600
339
12,000
1
14,000
40
800
231



                                                                                                                      00
                                                                                                                      o

-------
                                                                  81
APPENDIX
                                 TABLE  15

           RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS  FOR USE  OF COMMON GERMICIDAL
                SUBSTANCES AT ROOM TEMPERATURE (25° C)54
Sermicide
Phenol
Lysol
Quaternary ammonium com-
pounds (Roccal, Purasan,
Hyamine, etc. )
Hypochlorites + 1% wet-
ting agent (Naccanol,
etc. )
Caustic sodium hydroxide
Formalin (37%HCHO)
Steam formaldehyde vapor
(closed areas)
beta-Propiolactone vapor
Ethylene oxide gas
Concentration and Exposure Time for
Typical Classes of Microorganisms
Vegetative
Bacteria
5% (5 min)
2% (5 min)
0.1-1.0%
( 5 min )
200-1,000
ppm (1 min)
2% (15 min)
5% so In
( 10 min )
Bacterial
Spores
NRa
NRa
NRa
500-5,000
ppm (5
min)
5% (30
min)
10% so In
(10 min)
Funqi
5% (15 min)
3% (15 min)
NRa
2,000 ppm
(10 min)
10% (30
min)
5% so In
(10 min)
1 ml/ft3 in air with RHb
above 80% ( 30 min )
200 mg/ft3 in air with RHb
above 80% ( 30 min )
300 mg/liter (8-16 hr )
Bacterial
Toxins
NRa
NRa
NRa
NRa
5% soln
(pH 11.5)
(15 min)
5% soln
(10 min)
NRa
NRa
NRa
       aNR = not recommended.
           = relative humidity,

-------
                                                              82
APPENDIX

                              TABLE 16

            MATHEMATICAL MODEL ON HOSPITAL VENTILATION23


Let
  N = number of organisms/ft  present at time t in minutes

  V = volume of room in cubic feet

  K = number of .complete changes of room volume/hour

  b = total number of organisms/minute entering because of human
      presence

  a = efficiency of the filter

Then,

  NKV (1-a) A t = total number of organisms/ft  entering the
  V60             interval A t because of the inefficiency of
                  the filter.

  ]._ b A t = total number of organisms/ft3 entering during interval
  V         At because of contamination from individuals.


  — -g^— A t = total number of organisms/ft3 leaving during A t.

  A N = (total number of organisms/ft3 entering) - (total number
        of organisms/ft3 leaving)
           (1-a)
        60
  A N _ b _ KNa
  At   V   60

  dN _ b _ KaN _
  dt   V   60
= k (1 - aKVN )
  V (    60b~J
  1-aKVN   V "u
    6 Ob

       -aKVdn
   60b [*  6Ob   = [• b dt
       1-aKVN    J  ~V
         6 Ob
                                                      (Continued)

-------
                                                                  83
APPENDIX

                          TABLE  16 (Continued)

              MATHEMATICAL MODEL ON HOSPITAL VENTILATION
  6 Ob In   Cl - aKVN_) =  b t  +  C             If t = 0
  aKV      (.     60b )   v                      N = 0
                                         then, C = 0
_ 6Ob      i 1 - aKVN) _  b_
  aKV      \     60b  f~  v fc

_ 60  -r^   (l ~ aKVN)_ ^
  aK   ^"   J    60b^  u

 In   fl -  aKVN)   _ aKT
     (_     60b ^     60

 Cl -  aKVN) = exp _ aKt
 1      60b  \         60
 6 Ob
 aKV
1 - exp

-------
APPENDIX
                                             TABLE  17
                                        ROUGHING FILTERS
                                                        23
                              (Particle Retention3 10 to 60 Percent-13)


Nomenclature
AAF type HV 2



AAF PL 24 with
type G media

Drico puff-
glass

Farr-Air HP- 2



Farr 44-68




Manufacturer
American Air
Filter Corp. ,
Louisville,
Ky.
American Air
Filter Corp.

Drico Indus-
trial Corp.
Passaic, N.J.
Farr Filter
Co . , Los
Angeles ,
Calif.
Farr Filter
Co.



Media
Adhesive-coated
V- crimped wire
screen mesh

Glass filament


Spun glass
fiber

Pleated cotton
fabric


Crimped screen
and wire mesh

Capacity
cfm/ft2
of Face A
250
to
430

up
to
250
32
to
1,000
250
to
435

250
to
435
Face
Velocity
( f t/min )
300
to
500


250

300


250
to
435

250
to
435
Pressure
Drop
(HoO)
0.004"




0.06 '

0.08"
to
0.11"
0.045"
to
0.115"

0.040"


Maximum
operation
temperature
110°F




250°F

175°F


255°F



275°F


             to five
        "
        "Inclusion of any particular filter in this table does not constitute endorsement by
 the  United States Government or by the authors.

-------
APPENDIX
                                              TABLE  18


                                    MEDIUM-EFFICIENCY FILTERS23

                              (Particle Retention3 60 to 90 Percent13)


Nomenclature
AAF deep bed
Type 100 FG


AAF PL 24
frame
Type 25 FG
Aero solve 45


Expandure





Manufacturer
American Air
Filter Corp. ,
Louisville,
Ky.
American Air
Filter Corp.

Cambridge
Filter Corp. ,
Syracuse, N.Y.
Flanders
Filters,
Riverhead ,
N.Y.


Media
Fiberglass



Fiberglass


Glass fibers


Fiberglass



Capacity
cfm/ft"5
of Face A
50
to
250

50
to
250
up
to
500
250



Face
Velocity
( f t/min )
250



200


250
to
500
250



Pressure
Drop
(H20)
0.24"



0.09"


0.16"
to
0.25'
0.38"



Maximum
operation
temperature
700°F



400°F


400°F


200°F



                                                                                      (continued)
                                                                                                      oo
                                                                                                      en

-------
APPENDIX
                                        TABLE 18 (Continued)
                                                              23
                                    MEDIUM-EFFICIENCY FILTERS
                               (Particle Retention3 60 to 90 Percent")


Nomenclature
Type CA



U-Lok





Manufacturer
Microtron
Corp . ,
Charlotte,
N.C.
Union Carbide
Development
Co., N.Y.,
N.Y.


Media
Polyester/
acetate
adhesive-
coated
Dynel fibers



Capacity
cfm/ft2
of Face A
200
to
250

200
to
500

Face
Velocity
( f t/min )
200
to
250

300



Pressure
Drop
(H20)
0.08"
to
0.13"

0.10"



Maximum
operation
temperature
350°F



180°F



        aOne to five |_i.
        ^Inclusion of any particular  filter in this table does not constitute endorsement by
 the United States Government or by the authors.
                                                                                                   oo

-------
APPENDIX
                                              TABLE 19
                                                             ,23
                                      HIGH-EFFICIENCY FILTERS'
                               (Particle Retention3 90 to 99  Percent13)
Nomenclature
Multi-Pakc
with 50 FG
Deep bed with
50 FG
Micretain
Aerosolve 85
Aero solve 95
Manufacturer
American Air
Filter Corp. ,
Louisville,
Ky.
American Air
Filter Corp.
Cambridge
Filter Corp.
Syracuse,
N.Y.
Cambridge
Filter Corp.
Cambridge
Filter Corp.
Media
Glass fiber
Glass fiber
Glass-asbestos
pleated
Glass fibers
pleated
Glass fiber
pleated
Capacity
cfm/ft~2
of Face A
125
to
250
40
to
200
50
to
250
125
to
500
125
to
500
Face
Velocity
( f t/min )
250
200
Up
to
250
250
to
500
250
to
500
Pressure
Drop
(H?0)
0.42"
0.42"
0.4"
0.22"
to
0.32"
0.35"
to
0.45 '
Maximum
Operation
Temperature
400°F
400°F
22o°F
to
800°F
400°F
400°F
                                                                                                     oo
                                                                                      (continued)

-------
APPENDIX
                                        TABLE  19  (Continued)

                                      HIGH-EFFICIENCY FILTERS
                             (Particle Retention3 90 to 99 Percent*3)


Nomenclature
HP-100



HP-200



Manufacturer
Farr Filter
Co.,
Los Angeles,
Calif.
Farr Filter
Co.


Media
Glass fiber
pleated


Glass fiber

Capacity
cfm/ft^
of Face A
250



250

Face
Velocity
( f t/min )
250



250

Pressure
Drop
(H20)
0.20"



0.38"

Maximum
Operation
Temperature
275°F



275°F

        aOne to five |j-
        ^Inclusion of any particular filter  in this table does not constitute endorsement by
 the United States Government or by the authors.
        GThese filters made to accommodate double thiokness of media.
                                                                                                   03
                                                                                                   CD

-------
APPENDIX
                                             TABLE 20
                                                                .23
                                   ULTRA-HIGH EFFICIENCY FILTERS
                         (Particle Retention3 More than 99.99 Percent13)


Nomenclature
\AF Type F
(glass)


AAF Type F
( ceramic)

Cambridge
Absolute


Magnamedia



Airpure
absolute
glass F 600



Manufacturer
American Air
Filter Corp. ,
Louisville,
Ky.
American Air
Filter Corp.

Cambridge
Filter Corp. ,
Syracuse,
N.Y.
Farr Filter
Co. ,
Los Angeles,
Calif.
Flanders
Filters,
Riverhead ,
N.Y.


Media
Glass fiber
and kraft
paper or alum
sep.
Ceramic asbes-
tos f ib er and
alum sep.
Glass fiber
asbestos paper
sep.

Glass fiber



Glass fiber
(F 600)


Capacity0
cfm/ft2
of Face A
30
to
400

30
to
250
30
to
345

30
to
400

30
to
400

Face
Velocityd
ft/min
68
to
325

250


Up
to
275

Up
to
250

Up
to
320

Pressure
Drop
(H20)
1.0"



1.0"


1.0"



1.0"



1.0"



Maximum
Operation
Temperature
250°F
to
1,000°F

1,600°F
to
2,300°F
800°F



Up
to
1,000°F

850°F




-------
APPENDIX
                                       TABLE 20  (Continued)

                                   ULTRA-HIGH EFFICIENCY FILTERS
                         (Particle Retention3 More than 99.99 Percent-'3)


Nomenclature
Airpure
absolute
ceramic-
asbestos
Ultra-Aire





Manufacturer
Flanders
Filters


Mine Safety
Appliance Co .
Pittsburgh,
Pa.


Media
Ceramic-
asbestos


Glass fiber



Capacity0
cfm/ft2
of face A
50
to
250

35
to
250

Face
Velocity0*
f t/min
Up
to
250

Up
to
250

Pressure
Drop
(H20)
1.0"



0.9"



Maximum
Operation
Temperature
1,60QOF



500°F



        aOne  to  five  u.
        ^Inclusion of any particular  filter  in this table does not constitute endorsement by
 the United States Government or by the  authors.
        cCapacities are  in cfm/ft^ of face area, not total area of filter.
              velocities are fpm for  1 ft  of face area, not media velocity.
                                                                                                  o

-------
APPENDIX
                                            TABLE  21





        PENETRATION OF  Tl PHAGE3 AND BACTERIAL AEROSOLS13  THROUGH COMMERCIAL AIR FILTERS48



Filter type
Ultrahigh-
ef f iciency




Ultrahigh-
eff iciency




Ultrahigh-
eff iciency







Description
Glass micro-fibers
waterproofed ,
plastic base
adhesive, 35 cfm
rated capacity
8" x 8 ' x 3-1/16"
Glass asbestos
fibers with organic
binder, neoprene
type sealer, 30 cfm
rated capacity
8" x 8" x 3-1/16"
All-glass fibers
with no organic
binder, rubber base
type sealer, 30 cfm
rated capacity
8" x 8" x 3-1/16"


Test
Number
1
2
3


Mean
1
2
3


Mean
1
2
3


Mean

Relative
Humidity
%
15
to
20



15
to
20



20
to
25




Test
Air
Flow
25
cfm




25
cfm




25
cfm





Filter
Resistance
( water )
1.04"





0.69'1





0.53"





Penetration
Tl
Phagec
%
3.2xlO~3
4.3xlO~3
4.3xlO~3


3.9xlO~3
1.2xlO~3
6.0x10 4
7.6x10 4


8.5xlO~4
4.6xlO~3
3.9xlO~3
4.7xlO~3


4.4xlO~a
Bacterial
Spores
%
8.7xlO~5
9.6xlO~5
1.4xlO~4


l.lxlO~4
8.4xlO~5
6.1x10 5
7.2x10 5

•— R
7.2x10
4.0xlO~4
1.7x10 4
2.8x10 4

— -1
2.8x10

DOPe
%
0.011





0.02





0.006





                                                                                         (continued)

-------
APPENDIX
                                      TABLE  21 (Continued)
         PENETRATION OF Tl PHAGEa AND BACTERIAL AEROSOLS13 THROUGH COMMERCIAL AIR FILTERS



Filter Type
Ultrahigh-
eff iciency







Description
All-glass fibers
with no organic
binder, rubber base
type sealer, 22 cfm
rated capacity
8" x 8" x 12"


Test
Slumber
1
2
3


Mean

Relative
Humidity
%
15
to
20




Test
Air
Flow
22
cfm





Filter
Resistance
( water )
0.75"





Over-all mean for ultrahigh-ef f iciency filter units
High
efficiency



0.5" thick fiberglass
pads containing 1.25
U diameter glass
fibers

1
2
3

Mean
40
to
45


20ft
per
min*


0.50
0.50
0.51


Penetration
Tl
Phagec
%
l.lxlO"3
1.0x10 3
9.9x10 4


1.0xlO~3
3 xlO~3
1.8
2.0
1.9

1.9
Bacterial
Spores"
%
1.9xlO~3
2.2xlO~3
2.8xlO~3


2.3xlO~3

DOPe

0.002





7 x!0~4
0.23
0.26
0.50

0.33





       aTl phage  aerosol number median  diameter (NMD):  0.1 u.
       bB_. subtilis var. niger spore  aerosol  NMD:  1 u.
       GPrefilter total sampler (impinger  + backup filter) recovery:  10s  phage/liter.
        Prefilter cotton collector  recovery:  105  spores/liter.
       eDOP penetration as  stamped  on filter  unit  by manufacturer.
        Face velocity  (1.5  cfm through  3-3/4  inch  diameter filter pads).
to

-------
APPENDIX
                                       TABLE  22
               EFFECT OF ERADICANT  FUNGICIDES  ON SPORODOCHIA PRODUCTION,
                       CONIDIAL GERMINATION, AND BLOSSOM BLIGHT
                    CAUSED  BY MONILIA LAXA ON  DRAKE  ALMOND,  195880
Fungicide
 Dates of
application
  Average
 number of
sporodochia
 per twig
                                               Twigs
                                               with
                                            sporodochia
             Conidial
            germination
              on agar
           Amount blossom
           blight per 100
           20-inch shoots
              inspected
SPCP
SPCP plus
  LLS
SPCP
Untreated
 12/13/57

 12/13/57
  1/9/58
   4.6

   1.7
   8.8
  14.7
                                                   Orchard No.  1
SPCPa
SPCP plus
LLSa
SPCP
Untreated
12/12/57

12/12/57
1/22/58

0.58

0.94
0.28
2.04
18

16
20
74
94D

26
34
78
21.2

15.7
42.4
93.1
                                                    Orchard  No.  2
100

 48
 76
 96
46C


 1
 3
60
 60.9
 37.8
 78.1
232.0
        aSPCP  is  8.0 pounds of  37% sodium pentachlorophenoxide  in  100 gallons of water
applied at  the rate of 400 gal/acre with an  airblast  sprayer,  and LLS  is  11.2 gal of
32  Baume calcium polysulfide  combined with  SPCP.
        ^Potato dextrose  agar.
        cWater agar.
                                                                                 co

-------
APPENDIX
                               TABLE 23

                     TUBERCULOSIS HOSPITAL USE116
                     (Rates  per 1,000 Population)
                                                                94
Year
1935
1945
1955
1965
1966
Admission
Rate
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.3
0.2
Total D.ays
in Hospital
174.2
164.7
145.9
52.4
39.9
Average Length
of Stay (days)
257.4
253.1
218.9
182.5
168.3
Total Expense
per Patient Day


$7.20
$16.70
$18.27

-------
                                                                  95
APPENDIX
                                 TABLE 24
          DEATH RATE FOR THE 10 LEADING CAUSES OF DEATH,  1966116
                      (Rate per 100,000 Population)
          Disease
Death Rate
          Diseases of the heart
          Malignant neoplasms
          Vascular diseases affecting central
            nervous system
          Accidents
          Influenza and pneumonia
          Certain diseases of early infancy
          General arteriosclerosis
          Diabetes mellitus
          Other diseases of the circulatory system
          Other bronchiopneumonic diseases
   371.2
   155.1

   104.6
    58.0
    32.5
    26.4
    19.9
    17.7
    14.6
    14.5
                                 TABLE 25

DEATH RATE (1950 to 1966) AND DEATHS (1965 AND 1966) FROM SELECTED CAUSES116
^11 causes*
Tuberculosis
(all forms)
Meningococcal
infection
Asthma
Influenza and
pneumonia
( except pneu
monia of
newborn)
Influenza
Pneumonia
Bronchitis
Deaths per 100,000 Population Total Deaths
1950
963.8
22.5
0.6
2.9
_31.3
4.4
26.9
2.0
1955
930.4
9.1
0.6
3.6
27.1
1.7
25.4
1.9
1960
954.7
6.1
0.4
3.0
37.3
4.4
32.9
2.4
1964
939.6
4.3
0.4
2.3
31.1
0.9
30.2
2.8
1965
943.2
4.1
0.5
2.3
31.9
1.2
30.8
,3.0
1966
951.3
3.9
0.4
2.2
32.5
1.4
31.0
3.1
1965
1,828,136
7,934
850
4,520
61,903
2,295
59,608
5,772
1966
1,863,149
7,625
876
4,324
63,615
2,830
60,785
6,151
       *A11 causes listed in the complete table.

-------
APPENDIX
                                          TABLE 26

               SPECIFIED  REPORTABLE DISEASES:   CASES REPORTED,* 1945-1966116
Disease
Diphtheria
Measles
Meningococcal
infection
Pertussis
(whooping cough)
Psittacosis
Streptococcal sore
throat and scarlet
fever
Tuberculosis (newly
reported active cases
1945
18,675
146,013
8,208
133,792
27
185,570

1950
5,796
319,124
3,788
120,718
26
66,494

1955
1,984
555,156
3,455
62,786
334
147,502
76,245
1960
918
441,703
2,259
14,809
113
315,173
55,494
1963
314
385,156
2,470
17,135
76
342,161
54,062
1964
293
458,083
2,826
13,005
53
404,334
50,874
1965
164
261,904
3,040
6,799
60
395,168
49,016
1966
209
204,136
3,381
7,717
50
427,752
47,767
        *Figures  should be interpreted with caution.   Reporting of some of these diseases
 is known to be incomplete and only indicates trends  of disease incidence.

-------
                                                              97
APPENDIX




                             TABLE 27




RESPIRATORY DISEASES  IN THE UNITED STATES, JULY 1966-JUNE 1967117
Incidence
and Effects
Incidence (x 1000)
Days of restricted
activity (x 1000)
Days of bed
disability (x 1000)
Common
Cold
109,713
263,622
109,999
Influenza
55,382
186,514
102,016
Pneumonia
2,013
26,409
16,406
Bronchitis
3,411
19.966
10,392

-------
APPENDIX
                                                     TABLE 28




                   AGE-SPECIFIC DISEASE RATES  PER 100,000 POPULATION PER YEAR, 1959-61
28

-ause
?uberculosis ,
respiratory
. leningococcal
infections
Asthma
Influenza and
pneumonia ( except
of newborn)
Acute bronchitis
Chronic and Unqual-
fied bronchitis
Age distribution
for a standard
million population
Rate per Age Group
0.4
0.22

1.90
0.39
52.95


2.84
1.60


113,320

4-14
0.03

0.20
0.22
2.27


0.14
0.08


197,773

15-24
0.41

0.16
0.39
2.46


0.09
0.08


133,948

25-34
2.18

0.06
0.81
4.12


0.08
0.08


127,247

35-44
5.05

0.06
1.63
8.70


0.16
0.29


134,290

45-54
9.70

0.16
3.44
18.12


0.35
1.06


114,238

55-64
16.00

0.14
7.05
38.81


0.65
3.56


86,839

65-74
23.03

0.15
12.29
101.93


1.10
8.57


61,324


75-84
31.88

0.23
16.91
315.73


2.25
12.79


25,839

85+
36.70

0.19
. 16.08
998.74


7.40
12.68


5,182


All
5.89

0.34
2.69
32.07


0.64
1.63




                                                                                                           00

-------