RESEARCH CORPORATION
SUMMARY REPORT
AIR POLLUTANT EMISSION INVENTORY
FOR THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Prepared under
Contract No. 68 - 02 - 0049
JANUARY, 1972
Prepared for
NEW HAMPSHIRE
AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY
Concord, New Hampshire
and
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
OFFICE OF AIR PROGRAMS
Raleigh, North Carolina
toward a better environment
-------
Ulaldt":,,
RESEARCH CORPORATION
SUMMARY REPORT
ON
AIR POLLUTANT EMISSION INVENTORY FOR THE
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
by
Paul Morgenstern
Josette C. Goldish
Ronald G. Orner
January 1972
Prepared for
New Hampshire
Air Pollution Control Agency
Concord, New Hampshire
and
Environmental Protection Agency
Air Pollution Control Office
Raleigh, North Carolina
359 Allston Street 0000 Cambridge 0000 Massachusetts 0000021390000 617/868/3940
-------
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Walden Research Corporation gratefully acknowledges the cooperation
of the New Hampshire Air Pollution Control Agency,in many phases of this
project. The assistanc~ by other departments in the State of New Hamp-
shire in providing reports and copies of unpublished data also was of
great aid to the study. The work was supported under Contract No. 68-
02-0049 by the Environmental Protection Agency.
n
ii
WALDEN RESEARCH CORPORATION
-------
Section
I
II
III
IV
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX B
APPENDIX C
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Ti t1 e
INTRODUCTION
.. .......................................
METHODOLOGY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
A. Survey Area and Grid Coordinate System ...........
B. Fuel Consumption by Stationary Sources ...........
,. . Res; den t i a 1 ..................................
2 . COlTUTle rc; a 1 ...................................
3. Manufacturi ng ................................
4. Commercial and Industrial Point Sources ......
5. Steam-Electric Uti~ities .....................
C. Transportation Sources ...........................
1. Automat; ve ...................................
2 . A 1 rc r aft. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3 . Ra; 1 ro ads. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4. Vessels......................................
D. Industrial Process Loss ..........................
E. Gasoline and Solvent Evaporation .................
F. Refuse Disposal..................................
G. Emission Factors and Fuel Parameters .............
H. Reactive Hydrocarbon Emissions ...................
I. Grid Square Summaries ............................
J. All owab 1 e Emi ss ions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
RESULTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CONCLUS IONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
REFERENCES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .
COORDINATE TRANSFORMATION BETWEEN ADJACENT UTM GRID
SYSTEM SECTORS.......................................
POLITICAL JURISDICTION CODES .........................
REGIONAL POPULATION SUMMARIES ........................
; i i
Page
1
3
4
4
5
6
7
7
8
8
8
8
9
9
9
9
10
10
11
11
12
13
13
14
16
17
21
WALDEN RESEARCH CORPORATION
-------
Figure
1
2
3
4
5
6
.7
8
9
Table
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
LIST OF FIGURES
Caption
State of. New Hampshire Air Quality Control Regions ...
Subdivision of Total Fuel Consumption into User
Ca tegori es and Type of Use...........................
Grid System for Southern New Hampshire Showing Grid
Square Numbers and UTM Coordinates in km .............
Relative Distribution of Particulate Emissions by
Source Category......................................
Relative Distribution of SOx Emissions by Source
Ca tegory .............................................
Relative Distribution of Carbon Monoxide (CO) Emis-
sions by Source Category.............................
Relative Distribution of Hydrocarbon (HC) Emissions
by Source Category...................................
Relative Distribution of NOx Emissions by Source
Category................................."........... .
Statewide Distribution of Point Sources ..............
LIST OF TABLES
Title
Emissions Inventory Summary for the State of New
Hampshire, Merrimack Valley, Southern New Hampshire
Interstate Air Quality Control Region - Data Repre-
sentative of Calendar Year 1970 ......................
Emissions Inventory Summary for the State of New
Hampshire, Central New Hampshire Intrastate Air Qual-
ity Control Region - Data Representative of Calendar
Yea r 1 970 ............................................
Emissions Inventory Summary for the State of New
Hampshire, Androscoggin Valley Interstate Air Quality
Control Region - Data Representative of Calendar Year
1970 .................................................
Fuel Parameters......................................
Distribution of Solvent Sales ........................
Hydrocarbon Emission Inventory for Southern New
Hamps h ; re ............................................
iv
Page
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Page
32
35
38
41
42
42
WALDEN RESEARCH CORPORATION
-------
I.
INTRODUCTION
This report presents a summary of the results from an inventory of
air pollutant emissions within the State of New Hampshire. The survey
is based on information collected previously by the New Hampshire Air
Pollution Control Agency and supplemented by additional data assembled
during the current study. The contaminants considered included sulfur
* ** ***
oxides, carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, hydrocarbons, and par-
ticulates. Estimates of the annual emission of these pollutants were
developed for the year 1970 and are summarized in this report.
The State of New Hampshire is divided among three Federally desig-
nated [1,2J Air Quality Control Regions (AQCR) as shown in Figure 1:
(1) Androscoggin Valley Interstate AQCR (Maine-N.H.)
Political jurisdictions within New Hampshire
Coos County
(2) Central New Hampshire Intrastate AQCR
Political jurisdictions within New Hampshire
Carroll County
Grafton County
(3) Merrimack Valley - Southern New Hampshire Interstate AQCR
( Ma s s . - N . H. )
Political jurisdictions within New Hampshire
Bel knap County
Chesire County
Hil1sborough County
Merrimack County
Rockingham County
Strafford County
Sullivan County
This report presents the emissions within each of these Regions summarized
by source type. A supplementary data report provides similar tabulations
*
Primarily expressed as
**
Primarily expressed as
***
Primarily expressed as
sulfur dioxide.
nitrogen dioxide.
methane.
1
WALDEN RESEARCH CORPORATION
-------
of the emissions by source type for each municipality in the state.
The inventory data also have been summarized into a network of 77
grid squares for the Southern New Hampshire AQCR, supplemented by a
statewide list of approximately 464 specific point emission sources.
The grid square and point source information has been prepared in the
form of punch card decks to facilitate further computer processing.
2
WALDEN RESEARCH CORPORATION
-------
II.
METHODOLOGY
The methodology used to prepare the inventory conforms with the
rapid survey techniques developed by the National Air Pollution Control
Administration [3,4]. In its simplest form, the basic plan of this ap-
proach consists of first determining the consumption of fuels according
to combustion sources for power, space heating, and other industrial
process needs. The emission of pollutants arising from this set of
sources is estimated by the application of appropriate emission factors
in conjunction with selected fuel composition parameters. For the case
of particulate emissions, the factors also take cognizance of the reduc-
tion affected by existing installed control devices.
All pollutant emissions in the region can be broadly categorized as
that from stationary sources and that from non-stationary (transporta-
tion) sources. The latter category includes all modes of combustion
powered transportation including automobiles, buses, trucks, trains, ves-
sels, and aircraft. Stationary sources may also be classified into dif-
ferent user categories and type of use as illustrated in Figure 2. The
major categories of source types shown include domestic (residential),
commercial, institutions, manufacturing, and steam-electric utilities.
Most of these can be further classified as point sources which represent
individual establishments using very large quantities of fuel, as distin-
guished from area sources which represent, collectively, a large number
of smaller sources distributed over the survey district. The basic struc-
ture for classifying fuel consumption shown in Figure 2 was used in the
current inventory. Aside from its general utility, this system allows
for a subsequent comparison of the survey results with those completed in
a similar manner for other control regions.
Solid waste refuse disposal represents an additional source of pol-
lutants included in the inventory. Estimates of pollutant emissions
arising from combustion of the solid waste material by muni.cipal incin-
erators, open burning dumps, and backyard burning, are derived in a man-
ner similar to the previous source types, e.g., by using appropriate
emission factors.
3
WALDEN RESEARCH CORPORATION
-------
In addition to emissions from combustion sources, contaminants may
be discharged into the atmosphere as a consequence of industrial process
operations. Process loss emission factors are commonly given in terms
of production volume or weight of raw material processed, type of proc-
ess equipment, control devices, etc. The current survey included these
emissions in its scope when the appropriate process factors were avail-
able.
A.
SURVEY AREA AND GRID COORDINATE SYSTEM
The Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) coordinate system of the
U.S. Army Map Service [5] has been used to locate emission sources in the
State. The State of New Hampshire is covered by two such zones of the
UTM system (zones 18 and 19), and since the coordinate system for each
zone differs, it was necessary to modify the UTM system for the western
portion of the State in order to provide a consistent system throughout.
This modification consisted of extending the zone 19 coordinates to the
western border of the State. The equations for the extended coordinate
system relative to the zone 18 coordinates are given in Appendix A.
A network of grid squares was established for locating and sum-
marizing the emissions from area type sources in the Southern New Hamp-
shire AQCR. Four different size grid squares were used in this network.
The smallest grid square is 2 km on each side and was used to summarize
the emissions in the most highly urbanized metropolitan areas of the re-
gion. A square 4 km on each side was used to summarize the emissions in
the outer sectors of metropolitan areas, while 8 and 16 km squares were
used for the remaining rural parts of the region. The total network con-
sists of 77 contiguous grid squares. The location of each grid square
is given by the UTM coordinates of the center of the square. This grid
square network is shown in Figure 3.
B.
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY STATIONARY SOURCES
A survey was conducted on annual fuel consumption by stationary
sources within the State during 1970. These data were assembled from a
4
WALDEN RESEARCH CORPORATION
-------
mail and telephone questionnaire survey conducted by the New Hampshire
Air Pollution Control Agency, and supplemented with information published
in various reference sources. These results are given in Tables I-III
and show total fuel consumption summarized by region and by user category.
The sources of these data and the basis for further subdivision into city
and town estimates are presented in the following sections.
1.
Residential
The combustion of fuel by residential sources is primarily
for space heating during the winter months, and other domestic uses
throughout the year such as hot-water heating and cooking. The major
types of fuel used for this purpose are coal, distillate heating oil,
and natural gas.
The consumption of fuel for space heating can be calculated
from information on the number of dwelling units using coal, oil, or
natural gas. These fuel use patterns were developed in the current study
by updating of Bureau of Census [6] data collected during the 1960 cen-
sus. The updating considered both the changes in the total number of .
dwelling units within the past decade, and the trend toward increased
use of oil and natural gas for home heating with a decline in the use
of coal.
Changes in the number of housing units were based in part on
advance tabulations from the 1970 census for the cities and towns with at
least 10,000 inhabitants [7]. For the remaining cities and towns in the
State, advance population tabulations from the 1970 census were used to
derive 1970 housing units [8]. Trends in new heating unit installations,
and in the conversion of older burner units were derived from a comparison
of 1960-1970 reports on residential oil burners in use [9], and sales of
coal by retail dealers [10]. These trends were applied to the updated
housing unit file to produce a base for calculating 1970 home heating
fuel oil and coal consumption. The adjustments were made separately for
Standard Metropolitan Statistical Areas (SMSA) and for non-SMSA areas
within the State to reflect differences in fuel use patterns within these
5
WALDEN RESEARCH CORPORATION
-------
areas. Consumption of natural gas was obtained directly from utility com-
pany sales data.
The calculation of fuel oil and coa1* consumption for space
heating purposes considered regional and local differences in annual heat-
ing degree-days [11]. Non-space heating use of fuel for hot water heating
and cooking also was included in the computations.
2.
Commercial
The commercial category constitutes fuel consumption by a
broad range of business, semi-public, and public facilities, primarily
for satisfying space heating requirements. It includes retail and whole-
sale trade establishments, financial, real estate and insurance business
operations, as well as numerous personal and business service industries.
Also included in this grouping are recreation, entertainment and athletic
facilities as well as semi-public institutions such as hospitals, univer-
sities, cultural and religious centers. Public buildings comprising this
class include local, State, and Federal offices, primary and secondary
schools, fire and police stations, public works buildings, post offices,
etc.
The consumption of distillate oil was estimated from total
shipments of heating oil to New Hampshire during 1969 reported by the
Bureau of Mines [12] and extrapolated to 1970. This extrapolation was
based on a review of the trend in shipments over the past eight years.
Separation of the commercial component from the total was based on ex-
perience with previous inventories [13] which indicated that 10 percent
of the #2 oil shipments and 100 percent of the #4 oil shipments represent
~ reasonably reliable procedure. Consumption of residual fuel oil by com-
mercial sources also was estimated from total heating oil shipments [12].
In this case, partitioning was made on the basis of combined commercial
employment relative to total employment [14].
*
Estimates of anthracite coal for residential use were derived from tabu-
lations supplied by APCO based on shipments reported by the Commonwealth
of Pennsylvania, Department of Mines. .
6
WALDEN RESEARCH CORPORATION
-------
Gross consumption of bituminous coal by commercial sources
was assembled from Bureau of Mines tabulations [10] and extrapolated to
1970 again based on the trend observed from a review of shipments in
earlier years. Estimates of anthracite coal use for commercial heating
were derived from tabulations supplied by APCO from shipments to New
Hampshire cities and towns as reported by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
Department of Mines.
Fue.1 use by large commercial boilers was inventoried sepa-
rately from questionnaire information as described in Section B.4. The
balance between this reported point source fuel, and the gross regional
totals estimated above, was classified as consumption by area sources.
Further partitioning of this area source fuel was based on city and town
commercial employment data [14].
3.
Manufacturing
Combustion of fuel by manufacturing sources is for the pur-
pose of satisfying both space heating requirements and process needs.
Gross consumption of distillate oil, residual oil, coal, wood, and pro-
pane gas was compiled from the questionnaire file assembled by the New
Hampshire Air Pollution Control Agency. Industrial use of natural gas
was obtained directly from utility company sales information.
Fuel use by individual large manufacturing sources was in-
ventoried separately as described below. The balance between this point
source fuel and the gross regional totals was classified as consumption
by area sources. Partitioning of this area source fuel was based on city
and town industrial employment data [14] adjusted for the employment by
point sources.
4.
Commercial and Industrial Point Sources
Point sources are defined as those industrial establishments
and other boiler installations within the State which consume large quan-
tities of fuel, and thereby may represent large local air pollution emis-
sion sources. Detailed information on these facilities was obtained from
7
WALDEN RESEARCH CORPORATION
-------
i~
I
the State Agency questionnaire file and supplemented by an extensive tele-
phone survey.
dicating
nated as
All questionnaire responses were
annual air pollutant emissions of at
combustion point sources.
reviewed and only those in-
least 10 tons were desig-
Steam-Electric Utilities
5.
Steam-electric utilities constitute a large class of fuel
use in the State, and also provide the most accurately reported data.
Fuel use by each power plant was obtained from questionnaire data, and
supplemented by information from Federal Power Commission Reports [15J.
C.
TRANSPORTATION SOURCES
1.
Automotive
Estimates of air pollutant emissions from automotive traffic
in the State were based on total sales of motor fuels derived from 1969
tax records and extrapolated to 1970 [16]. This was separated into rural
and urban travel based on statewide vehicle-mile figures [17]. Finally,
consumption of diesel fuel by trucks, trailer-tractors, buses, etc., was
estimated from the vehicle-mile data* based on a consumption factor of
5. 1 mi / ga 1 .
2.
Aircraft
Estimates of total air traffic at municipal and private air-
fields in the State were obtained through the New Hampshire Aeronautics
Commission [18J. These totals were partitioned further into commercial
and private traffic on the basis of airline schedules. Airline schedules
also were used to classify aircraft type for commercial traffic. Infor-
mation on air traffic at Pease Air Force Base was not made available dur-
ing the course of this study.
*
Traffic by diesel-powered vehicles was assumed to be 2 percent of the
total.
8
WALDEN RESEARCH CORPORATION
-------
3.
Ra i 1 roads
Total consumption of residual oil and diesel fuel by rail-
roads for steam and power was obtained from previously cited Bureau of
Mines tabulations [12] extrapolated (decreased) to 1970. These values
were distributed among the cities and towns in the State on the basis
of industrial employment.
4.
Vessels
Consumption of diesel fuel by motor ships was similarly ex-
tracted from Bureau of Mines reports [12] and extrapolated to 1970.
Residual fuel oil use by steamships was estimated from waterborne ship-
ping information reported by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers [19]. Both
residual oil and diesel fuel were distributed among navigable waterways
in the State on the basis of the traffic data reported by the Corps of
Engineers.
D.
INDUSTRIAL PROCESS LOSS
The discharge of pollutants into the atmosphere from raw mate-
rial processing can arise from a broad class of industrial operations.
The development of reliable estimates of emissions from these sources
often requires a detailed knowledge of the individual plant design,
method of operation, production data, and installed control equipment.
The existing file of questionnaires were reviewed and only those indi-
cating annual emissions of at least 1 ton were inventoried. Where ad-
di~iona1 information was required to evaluate the source, the State
Agency performed further telephone contact.
E.
GASOLINE AND SOLVENT EVAPORATION
Emissions of gasoline due to evaporation during storage,
handling, and marketing operations were estimated from the application
of appropriate emission factors [20] to gasoline sales data.
The emission of solvent vapors from the application of surface
coatings, dry cleaning and degreasing operations, and other industrial
9
WALDEN RESEARCH CORPORATION
-------
processes using solvents was estimated from city and town population data
and an assumed per capita value of 30 1b/yr [21]. This per capita value
is composed on the average of 50.9% for surface coatings (paint), 7.0%
for dry cleaning, 16.5% for degreasing and 25.6% for all other miscella-
neous uses. A summary of 1970 population counts is given in Appendix C.
F.
REFUSE DISPOSAL
The weight of household refuse was estimated from city and town
population data "and an assumed per capita generation of 5 1b/day. These
estimates were further adjusted for the seasonal influence of tourism.
The methods for disposal of this waste was assumed to be 95% in municipal
facilities, and 5% by backyard burning in towns with less than 20,000 in-
habitants; cities with greater than 20,000 inhabitants were assumed to
provide 100% disposal in municipal facilities. Communities with less
than 40 residents were assumed to use only backyard burning disposal
methods. Industrial waste inventoried from the point source question-
naire file was added to the municipal disposal load.
An incinerator study conducted by the State Agency is currently
in its initial phase. Since no substantial data were available, on-site
incineration was estimated from city and town population data and an as-
sumed per capita generation of 2 1b/day [22].
G.
EMISSION FACTORS AND FUEL PARAMETERS
Computation of pollutant emissions from the combustion of fuel,
combustion of solid waste, or raw material processing operations was per-
formed by the application of appropriate emission factors. A compilation
of these emission factors has been assembled and published by the Environ-
mental Protection Agency [20]. These factors were used in estimating
emissions for the current study.
Fuel parameters on sulfur content and ash content reported by
the specific sources inventoried were used in estimating emissions.
Where no such values were reported, and for the calculation of emissions
from area sources, the values given in Table IV were used [22].
10
WALDEN RESEARCH CORPORATION
-------
H.
REACTIVE HYDROCARBON EMISSIONS
A partitioning of total hydrocarbon emissions from all sources
was made on the basis of an assigned reactivity designation to the vari-
ous hydrocarbon species. This assignment classified all hydrocarbon
emissions other than solvent vapors to be in the reactive class [21J.
For solvent vapors, a special telephone survey was conducted to charac-
terize compound use patterns. The principal classes of solvent users
considered were surface coating (paints), dry cleaning, and degreasing.
The average percentage distribution of sales reported are presented in
Table V. A fourth unspecified class containing all miscellaneous uses
for adhesives, printing inks, etc., could not be easily resolved because
of the highly specialized marketing of these products by manufacturers
and distributors. Consequently, they were all assumed to be reactive
compounds.
The census of manufacturers shows annual shipments of paint by
New England firms to be nearly equally distributed between industrial use
and trade use. Applying these shipments data as weighting factors to the
partitioning between solvent base and water base paints produces an over-
all distribution of 33.6% for water base and 66.4% for solvent base. This
differs slightly from the national average which is 25% for water base and
75% for solvent base.
Applying the results of this special survey to the per capita
solvent use produces an overall weighted distribution of 74% reactive
and 26% non-reactive.
I.
GRID SQUARE SUMMARIES
To facilitate the subsequent use of the emission inventory for
the purpose of investigating control strategies by means of computer sim-
ulation modeling, the city and town summaries for Southern New Hampshire
(including the town of Lebanon) were distributed into the grid square net-
work described previously. This distribution was performed on the basis
of land use surveys where detailed data were available from planning
agencies [23J. Land use summarized by class of use, i.e., residential,
11
WALDEN RESEARCH CORPORATION
-------
commercial, manufacturing, transportation, etc., for census tracts or
traffic zones were used to proportion the city and town emissions totals
into grid squares. Because the census tracts, traffic zones, and grid
squares represent a smaller scale than the city and town level, the spa-
tial resolution of emissions should be enhanced. For communities with-
out equivalent land use data, U.S. Geologic Survey maps were used to
partition community emissions into grid squares.
The distribution of emissions into grid squares was applied only
to area sources. All other emission sources which were individually in-
ventoried were not included in the grid square summaries. These included:
Commercial and manufacturing fuel burning point
Process emission sources
Municipal incinerators and open burning dumps
Steam-electric utilities
Airports
sources
The complete inventory consists of 77 grid square summaries and 464 in-
dividual emission sources. The distribution of these point sources is
illustrated in Figure 9. A list of political jurisdiction numbers used
for coding the city or town location for point and area sources is- given
in Appendix B.
J.
ALLOWABLE EMISSIONS
Allowable emissions of sulfur oxides and particulates were cal-
culated for all point sources. Two sets of allowable emission calcula-
tions were performed. The first of these was based on existing New
Hampshire Air Pollution Control Commission Regulations. Another set of
allowable emission computations was based upon the Federal Model Regula-
tions [24]. The results from these calculations were entered into the
point source data punch card decks.
12
WALDEN RESEARCH CORPORATION
-------
III.
RESULTS
A summary of the annual emissions by source type for each Air Qual-
ity Control Region is presented in Tables I, II and III. The relative
contribution by each source category for the five pollutants mentioned
is shown in Figures 4-8. Further resolution of the area source emissions
within the AQCR's into city and town values is provided by the data tabu-
lation in a Data Supplement to this report.
The results derived from partitioning total hydrocarbon emissions
into reactive species for the Southern New Hampshire AQCR is presented
in Table VI.
IV.
CONCLUSIONS
An inventory of fuel use and emission estimates for the year 1970
has been prepared for the State of New Hampshire. The inventory has
been summarized in this report on a Regional basis. A supplementary
data report provides similar machine tabulations of fuel use and emis-
sions for each municipality in the State. Summaries of fuel use and
emissions also have been prepared for a network of grid squares, and
list of point sources. All data used to prepare the inventory are
available in the form of computer punch cards and machine tabulations.
The composite of all tabulations provides a comprehensive picture of
air pollutant emissions in the Air Quality Control Regions.
13
WALDEN RESEARCH CORPORATION
-------
REFERENCES
1.
2.
3. Ozolins, G. and R. Smith, A Rapid Survey Technique for Estimating
Communit Air Pollution Emissions, U.S. Dept. of HEW, PHS Pub. No.
999-AP-29, Cincinnati, Ohio October 1966).
4.
Bierbaum, P. J. and M. J. Gedgaudas, Air Pollutant Emission Inventor
Techniques, (Unpublished draft report, U.S. Dept. of HEW, Natl0nal
Air Pollution Control Administration.
5. The Universal Transverse Mercator Grid, Dept. of the Army Tech. Manual
DA TM-5-237, Chapter 13, Hq., Dept. of the Army, Washington, D.C.
6.
United States Census of Housinf+1 1960, Vol. I, State and Small Areas,.
New Hampshire, Final Report HC -31, U.S. Dept. of Commerce,
Washington, D.C. (1962).
7.
1970 Census of Housing, General Housing Characteristics, New Hamp-
shire, Advance Report HC(Vl)-31, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Washington,
D.C. (November 1970).
8. 1970 Census of po~, Final Population Counts, New Hampshire,
Advance Report PC Vl -3 , U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Washington, D.C.
(November 1970).
1I0il Burner Installations," Fueloil and Oil Heat, Vol. 30, No.4,
Heating Publishers, Inc., Montclair, N.J. (April 1971).
10. Minerals Yearbook, 1968, Vol. I-II, Metals, Minerals and Fuels, U.S.
Dept. of Interior, Washington, D.C. (1969).
9.
11.
Economic Area Profile (for Economic and Planning Areas), State of
New Hampshire, Dept. of Resources and Economic Development, Concord,
N.H. (1969-1970).
12.
Sales of Fuel Oil and Kerosene in 1969, Mineral
Bureau of Mines, Dept. of Interior, Washlngton,
14
WALDEN RESEARCH CORPORATION
-------
REFERENCES (continued)
13.
Ehrenfeld, J. R., et al., Systematic Study of Air Pollution from
Intermediate-Size Fossil-Fuel Combustion Equipment, Final Report
under EPA Contract No. CPA 22-69-85, prepared by Walden Research
Corp., Cambridge, Mass. (March 1971).
Private Communication, Economic Analysis and Reports (unpublished),
State of New Hampshire, Dept. of Resources and Economic Development,
Concord, N.H. (1969-1970).
14.
15.
Steam-Electric Plant Air and Water Quality Control Data for the Year
Ending December 31, 1969, Report to the Federal Power Commission,
FPC Form 67, Washington, D.C.
Analysis of Motor-Fuel Usage in Calendar Year 1969, U.S. Dept. of
Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Bureau of Public
Roads, Washington, D.C. (July 1970).
16.
17.
18.
Private Communication, New Hampshire Aeronautics Commission, Concord,
N. H. (May 1971).
19.
Waterborne Commerce of the U.S., 1968, Part 1, Dept. of the Army,
Corps of Engineers, Waltham, Mass.
McGraw, M. J. and R. L. Duprey, Compilation of Air Pollution Emission
Factors, Preliminary Document, U.S. Dept. of HEW, Environmental Pro-
tection Agency, Research Triangle Park, N.C. (April 1971).
20.
21.
Private Communication, Environmental Protection Agency, Region I,
Boston, Mass. (July 1971).
22.
Private Communication, State of New Hampshire Air Pollution Agency,
Concord, N.H. (1971).
23.
Metropolitan Manchester Planning Study, Vol. II, New Hampshire Dept.
of Resources and Economic Development, prepared by Wilbur Smith and
Assoc. (1967).
24.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards, EPA, Federal Register, Vol.
36, No. 67, Washington, D.C. (April 7,1971).
15
WALDEN RESEARCH CORPORATION
-------
APPENDIX A
COORDINATE TRANSFORMATION BETWEEN ADJACENT
UTM GRID SYSTEM SECTORS
The Universal Transverse Mercaptor (UTM) grid coordinate mapping sys-
tem is based on division of the globe into sectors which are 6 degrees in
longitude. One of these division lines occurs in the western half of the
State of New Hampshire along the 72°W meridian of longitude. To avoid an
ambiguity in the coordinate location of the sources inventoried through-
out the State, a continuous system was constructed by extending the sec-
tor grid system east of the 72°W longitude across the western part of the
State. An empirical set of transformation formulae were developed to per-
form the conversion. The equations are:
XE = Xw . cos e - YW . sin e + Xo
(1)
YE = YW . cos e + Xw . sin e + Yo
(2)
where
Xw is the true UTM horizontal coordinate (km) of a point west of
now
Yw is the true UTM vertical coordinate (km) of a point west of
now
XE is the equivalent horizontal coordinate (km) of the point in
the extended grid coordinate system
YE is the equivalent vertical coordinate (km) of the point in the
. extended grid coordinate system
e has the fixed value -4.141316 degrees
Xo has the fixed value -821.260 km
Yo has the fixed value +66.2102 km
The accuracy of this transformation is better than 0.1 km over the region
of interest.
16
WALDEN RESEARCH CORPORATION
-------
APPENDIX B
POLITICAL JURISDICTION CODES
- 17
WALDEN RESEARCH CORPORATION
-------
TABLE B-1
POLITICAL JURISDICTION CODES FOR THE MERRIMACK VALLEY-
SOUTHERN NEW HAMPSHIRE AQCR (REGION NO. 121)
i ~t'.:;!,~~1 T QI./:. I I REGIONi iiollT'1 CAl-r- r"6"N .- I I;<.EGIONI I
POll TICAL .1:'. EG IONI POLITICAL "f.lJld/l! I POll TI CAl TOWN
I IJURI sOlcnoNI i I IJURISOICT IONf"--- 1'1 IJUPISDICTIONI Iq IJURISDICTIONI I:
I III I 29 I AlhJN I I 121 1 52 1 HANCHEST - I. I 121 I 73 1 CERR Y , I 121 I 99 1 GRAN THAfw I
.'. --- . '_.0. , .
I ~ll I 2') I P.A~"S TEA I I 121 I 45 I !WASON I I 121 1 72 I E. KINGS I I 121 I 95 I Ur-;GCON I
I 12i I 29 1 &E.L/lcrn II 121 I ...-- 53..._1. HERR IMAC... '- I 121 I 74 I EPPING i I 121 I 95 I tEMPS TER I
I 121 I 29 I CE!~T tP Ii I I 121 1 54 1 MILFORD I I 121 I 75 I EX:: rtr< I I 121 I 99 I Nf.IIP(j~T I
I 121 I - -.. 33 .... - I GllfCi y I I 121 I 61 I EPSO" I I 121 I 71 I SANOOioN I
I 121 I 35 I STI~rr.A~() II 121 I 6'j .. -.- I FRANKLIN I I 121 I 86 I SEABRCCK I -..-"- --.-.-..----
I 121 ,- 35 I Still f ~AN II 121 I 62 I "fNNIKER I I 121 1 72 I SOUTH HA I
I 121 I - 35 .-- - I SIJR~Y II 121 -- 1____..62 ------ 1 Hill __I I 121 I .- -12: . -- I STRATIiAH I -- --------- --------
I 121 ' 1,1 I S~,~NZ~Y II 121 I 66 I HOOK SE T r I I 121 I 87 I "INOHAM I
I 121 I 4l I TROY I I 121 I 67 I kCPKINTO I I 121 I 88 I BAQRINGT I.. .. - -- -"'... ----------
I 121. I 43 I IoI1LPCLE I I 121 I 61 I LCUDCN ' I 121 I 89 I [)OVE~ I
.
I 121 I -- 35 .' WE 5 TlACRE II 121 1 .-... -- 62 ..---- I N[IcBURY _I. I 121 I 90 I OURHAfII I .--- -_ .. ---.-----.--
1 ~21 I 44 I "INCHEST II 121 I 68 I N~." lOND I I 121 I 91 I FARf'lINGT I
I 121 1._.... 45.__1 A"Hf.aFI E '1'121 I 71 1 ATI
-------
TABLE B-2
POLITICAL JURISDICTION CODES FOR THE CENTRAL NEW HAMPSHIRE
INTRASTATE AQCR (REGION NO. 149)
I iJURISOICTliJN,.-_n II
I 149 I 1 I ALBANY II
I l't9 I 2 I B.6RTlETT II
I 149' 3 " BROO~FIE I I
, 11,9 I 4 'CHATI-!AM II
I 1,.9 I -- _n ~ _H'__- I CONWAY I I
: i49 I 6 I EA10N----"11
i 149 I 7 , EFFlliGtU II
I 149 I 8 'FRtECOM I I
I 149 I 9 , HALES LC I
I 149 I 10 -. I HARTS LO ,
, 149_'..__-- 11-____---.1 JACKSC"n__L___--- ----.-- - ..-..
I 149' 12 I MADISON I
I 149 I 13 I ~CULTONB I
I 14~ I 14 I CSSIPEE I-
1149 I 15 I SM.OWICH I
I 149 I 16 I T AMIoGRTH I .
I 149 __I -- 11 ----- I 1l.F 10"'BC I -- ...-' ---- --- - . - _n.. "-------
'l't9 I 18 I WAKEFIEl f-
I 149 I 19 I WOlFF.eCA I
I 149 I 20 I ALE )cANDR ,
, 149..1 21 I ASHLAND I
I 149 I' 22 I eATH I
I 149 I 23 I BENTON .L ----_.-._----- ------ ---
I 14~ I 24- -- I BETHLEHE I
'149 I 25 , 8P.IDGEWA I - - - ---- -- -
I l't9 I 26 I 8R IS TOL I
I 149 I 21 I CAIi'PTOt\ I - -------.--.-- - --. --------.---
I 149 I 28 I CANUf\ I
1149 I 29 I DORCH EST 1______---------------.-
I 149 I 30 - I EASTCN I
I 11,9 I ~1 I ElLSWORl I
I 149' 32 I ENf-IELD I ---- . -- -
I 149 I B I FRANCO.; I -----
I 149 I 34 I GRAfTON'-
1149 I 3'5_._.- I GkCTlN -_I"':"'--__H__--.n_H -----
I 14ti I H I HAN:~ER I
I i4~ I .;7 I HI1VEI
-t
o
Z
'I:
-------
TABLE B-3
POLITICAL JURISDICTION CODES FOR THE ANDROSCOGGIN
VALLEY INTERSTATE AQCR (REGION NO. 107)
IkEGIONI POLITICAL
'OUN .
~
,.
r-
C
ITI
Z
XI
ITI
(II
~
XI
(")
:J:
(")
o
XI
~
XI
,.
-4
o
Z
1 IJUR-isriicT iONI 1
i 1,,-; I 1 1 ATKI~SCN 1
1 1C7 I 2 I 8EANS GR I
1 101 1 J 1 HANS PU 1
I 1(1 1 ~ 1 eERLIN 1
I 101 1 -- -.--- 5. I CA!'HIR lOG I.
I 101 I 6 I CARROll I
I 107 I 7 I CHANDLER 1
I lQ7 1 8 1 ClAPKSlI1 1
1 lC7 I 9 1 CCLEeRCG 1
1 107 1 lC I CCLUMBIA 1
I 107 ..1. --.- il...___1 CRAWFORC 1
1 107 I 12 1 CUTTS CR 1
1 107 1 13 1 OAL TON I
11;}7 1 1't..n"'1 DIXSGRA 1
1 lC7 1 15 I CIXVILlE 1
I 107 1 16 1 ()U!'l~,ER 1
! lC7.1______17._._.._1 E~ROLo_1
1 lC7 1 18 1 ER\lUGS 1
I lC7 I 19 . I GROVE TeN 1
I 107 1 20 -I GCRt-IAfi 1
I 107 I. 21... 1 ifFF£:RSC 1
! 101 I 22 I K IU.[NNY I
I 107 ,_. - B ._..1 lAI\CASTE I
I ~\J7 I 24 1 LCW t eu I
-! 107 Lh..h..25' . 1 "A~Tl"S I
1 lC7 1 26 1 ~IlA" 1
1101 '-_..27 :0. 1 "ILlSFIE 1
1 IJ7 I 28 1 ~CRT~U"e I
I 10 1_..29..:_1 CDHL 1
I 1~7 I 30 I PINKHAM'S I
11(;1 1.._--.31 I PITTSBLIR I
I IG7 1 32 1 RANDOLPH 1
I In 1 - --... 33 1 SA"GfNTS I
1 107 1 3~ 1 SHEle~R" 1
1 :107 1____35 I STARK 1
1 IG7 1 36 1 STE~ARi5 I
I 101 ,. 37 , ~T~A1FCR I
i 107 1 3~ 1 suc~~ss I
I i 'J 7 I 3'> ; T!-if ~ ,:;, '.:. i
I 1J7 I' 40 1 ..:::NhC:..i I
1.I.o~ '-.._--.itl. I IoiHIHFIr' :
N
o
. - _.- -"--...------.
-------
1- -
APPENDIX C
REGIONAL POPULATION SUMMARIES
21
WALDEN RESEARCH CORPORATION
-------
'TABLE C-l
REGIONAL POPULATION SUMMARIES
Region
Population
Androscoggin Valley
Central New Hampshire
Southern New Hampshire
TOTAL
34,291
73,462
629,928
737,681
22
WALDEN RESEARCH CORPORATION
-------
Coos
c...o~
!IoUUIVAH
CkC\tHltt
."1 L 5801l0U(,"
Androscoggin Valley Inter-
state Air Quality Control
Region (Me.-N.H.)
Central New Hampshire Intra-
state Air Quality Control
Region (Remaining Area)
Merrimack Valley-Southern New
Hampshire Interstate Air Qual-
ity Control Region (Mass.-
N.H.)
Figure 1.
State of New Hampshire Air Quality Control Regions.
23
WALDEN RESEARCH CORPORATION
-------
Figure 2.
Subdivision of Total Fuel Consumption into User
Categories and Type of Use (After Ref. 3).
24
WALDEN RESEARCH CORPORATION
-------
Figure 3.
Grid system for Southern
New Hampshire showing grid
square numbers and UTM co-
ordinates in km.
)f
Base Map
with'
County and Town Lines
4952:
+9~-
4-BW
4-804
. f71B
4-772.
47~
.. "7 +-0
'"
I
3Z.Z.
j
3~8 .
~+
471..4
2'0£ .
7.
8C"",C .... .......c:.
2~~
~+z.
2G8
.l.7+
z.'fO'
1D"
.
.
25
-------
N
~
On-Site Incineration 0.6%
. Process
Losses
78.9%
Residential 1.3%
+Process
Losses 3.3%
~ Transportation
'Muni ci pa 1
Incineration 0.9%
1.0%~
Central N.H. Intrastate
Air Qual ity. Control Region
Androscoggin Valley Interstate
Air Quality Control Region
. Transportation 5.5%
. Municipal Incineration 4.0~
& Ind 6.2%
Merrimack Valley-Southern N.H. Interstate
Ai r Qual ity Control Region
Figure 4.
Relative Distribution of Particulate Emissions by Source Category.
-------
N
.......,
. Process Losses 1.9%~
On-Site Incineration < O.l%~
, Residential 4.5%---...
Open Burning 0.1%"
Transportation 0.4%-- ~
Open Burning 1.6%
Incineration 0.9%
Central N,.H. Intrastate
Air,Quality Control Region
Androscoggin Valley Interstate
Air Quality Control Region
....Municipal Inciner~tion 0.1%'
~Transportation 1.4% '
~Open Burning 0.2%
Process Losses 0.5%
On-Site Incineration 0.2%
Merrimack Valley-Southern N.H. Interstate
Ai r Qual ity Control Region
Fi !1ure 5,
Rf'lntiVf' Oistribution of SO., Emissions by Source Category.
-------
Comm-Inst1 & Ind <0.1%
On-Site Incineration 0.4
Residential 0.3%-..
Process Losses 1.4%
Incineration 0.4%
~
~Residentia1 0.3%
Comm-Inst1 & Ind 0.1%
Municipal Incineration <0.1%
N
00
Central N.H. Intrastate
Air Quality Control Region
Steam-Electric 0.2%
Process Losses 0.5%
On-Site Incineration 0.4%
Residential 0.2%
Municipal Incineration 0.4
Comm-Inst1 & Ind < 0.1
Transportation
92.8%
Merrimack Valley-Southern N.H. Interstate
Air Quality Control Region
Fi gu re 6.
Androscoggin Valley Interstate
Air Quality Control Region
Relative Distributi.on of Carbon Monoxide (CO) Emissions by Source Category.
Ii
-------
N
U)
Residential 0.7%
On-Site Incineration 0.4%
Comm-Instl & Ind 2.9%
Process Losses 15.5%
On-Site Incineration 0.5%
Residential 0.7%
Comm-Instl & Ind 0.2%
. Municipal Incineration 0;3%
Central N.H. Intrastate
Air Quality. Control Region
Androscoggin Valley Interstate Air
Quality Control Region
Steam-Electric 0.5%
On-Site Incineration 0.6%
Municipal Incineration 0.7%
Comm-Instl & Ind 0.4%
esidential 0.6%.
Figure 7.
Merrimack Valley-Southern N.H. Interstate
Air Quality Control Region
Relative Distribution of .Hydr9carbon (HC) Emissions by Source Category.
-------
(AI
o
Trans portat i on
86.3%
Incineration < 0.1%
Open Burning 2.7%~
Residential 2.3%
On-Site Incineration 0.4%
On-Site Incineration 0.8%
Central N.H. Intrastate Air
Quality Control Region
Androscoggin Valley Interstate
Air Quality Control Region
Incineration 0.6%
Residential 2.5%
Process Losses 0.2%
. Open Burning 1.8%
Municipal Incineration 0.2%
Merrimack Valley-Southern N.H. Interstate
Air Quality Control Region
Figure 8.
Relative Distribution of NO Emissions by Source Category.
x
-------
Fi gure
9.
Statewide distribution
of point sources.
o
Base rv1ap
with.
County and TOVJn Lines
............
31
-------
TABLE I
EMISSIONS INVENTORY SUMMARY
FOR THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, MERRIMACK VALLEY - SOUTHERN NEW HAMPSHIRE INTERSTATE
AIR QUALITY CONTROL REGION - DATA REPRESENTATIVE OF CALENDAR YEAR 1970
Source Category Tons of Pollutant/Year Fuel Etc.
Part S02 CO HC NOx Quantity Units
1. Fuel Combustion
A. Res i denti a 1 Fuel-Area Source
1. Coal 20 71 78 19 8 3 ,1 33 tons
2. Di sti 11 ate Oi 1 1 ,1 31 8,143 566 339 1 ,357 226,207 thou gal
3. Natural Gas 37 1 39 16 148 3,944 mil cu ft
4. Wood
w 5. Other
N 6. Total 1 ,1 88 8,215 683 374 1,513
B. Comm-Inst1 & Ind
La. Coal-Area Source 86 128 74 18 13 3,673 tons
b.' Coal-Point Sour~e 64 215 31 7 23 5,663 tons
2. Coke-Point. Source
3.a. Distillate Oil-Area Source 260 1 ,249 4 52 1 ,041 34 ,701 thou gal
b. Distillate Oil-Point Source 43 400 1 9 171 5,694 thou gal
4.a. Residual Oil-Area Source 99 1 ,506 1 13 258 8,612 thou gal
b. Residual Oil-Point Source 762 10,873 7 100 2,011 66,631 thou gal
5.a. Natural Gas-Area Source 14 ° 6 22 106 1 , 588 mi 1 cu ft
~ b. Natural Gas-Point Source 4 0 0 8 34 399 mil cu ft
,... 6. Process Gas-Point Source
0 7.a. Wood-Area Source 8 0 1 1 3 564 tons
ITI
z
::u b. Wood-Point Source 255 0 30 18 94 18,083 tons
ITI 8.a. Propane-Area Source 4 ° ° 9 27 1 ,402 thou gal
(J).
ITI b. Other-Point Source
»
::u 9. Total 1,599 14,371 155 257 3,781
(")
:I:
(") C. Steam-Electric Power Plant
0
;0
-0 1. Anthracite Coal
0
;0 2. Bituminous Coal 11 ,766 48,697 550 165 9,900 1 ,1 00 thou ton
»
-4
(5 .
Z Included under process losses
-------
TABLE I (Cant.)
Source Category Tons of Pollutant/Year Fuel Etc.
Part S02 CO HC NOx Quantity Uni ts
I. C. Steam-Electric Power Plant
3. Di sti 11 ate Oil
4. Residual Oi 1 298 1 3,039 1 186 3,9.14 74,550 thou gal
5. Natural Gas
6. Other
7. Total 12,064 61 ,736 551 351 13,814
D. Total Fuel COnDustion 14,851 84,322 1 ,389 982 1 9 , 1 08
II. Process Losses
A. Area Sources {Solvents) 0 0 O. 9,448 0 9,448 tons
B. Point Sources 4 ,1 00 442 1 ,633 4,432 94
III. Solid Waste Disposal
w
w A. Inci nerati on
1. a. On Site-Area Source 816 175 1 ,165 350 350 233,031 tons
b. On Site-Point Source 14 1 19 15 2 2,269 tons
2. Municipal, etc.-Point Source 942 71 1 ,267 446 144 82,094 tons
B. Open Burning
1. a. On Site-Area Source 138 9 732 258 52 17,231 tons
b. On Site-Point Source
2.a. Dumps-Area Source
b. Dumps-Point Source 2,847 172 1 5 ,1 08 5,333 1 ,065 357,247 tons
~ C. 1. Other-Area Source
».
r- 2. Other-Point Source
0
f'T1
Z D. Total Solid Waste Disposal 428 18 ,291 6,402 1 ,613
:0 4,757
f'T1
(/J
f'T1
»
:0
(')
::r
(")
0
:0 *
~
0 Incl udes process fuel use of 3600 tons coal, 2219 thou gal residual oil, 850 thou gal distillate oil, and 420
:0
» tons coke.
-t
0
Z
-------
Source Category
TABLE I (Cont.)
Tons of Pollutant/Year Fuel Etc.
Part S02 CO HC NOx Quanti ty Units
1 ,128 683 271,486 48,848 37,482 3,416 mil vehi c 1 e-
miles
212 382 2,758 552 2,886 1 6,974 thou gal
32 83 478 43 29 86 thou L TO
2 6 6 5 7 182 thou gal
3 35 2 6 3 220 thou gal
o 0 0 3, 1 00 0 3 ,1 00 tons
1 ,377 1 ,189 274,730 52,554 40,407
IV. Transportation-Area Source
A.1. Motor Vehicles-Gasoline
w
~
2. Motor Vehicles-Diesel
B. Off-Highway Fuel Usage
C. Ai rcraft .
D. Rai 1 roads
E. Vessels
F. Gasoline Hnd1g.Evap. Losses
G. Other
H. Total Transportation
V. Miscellaneous-Area Sources
A. Agricultural Burning
B. Other
C. Total Miscellaneous
VI. Grand Total
A. Area Source
B. Point Source
C. Total
3,958
21,128
25,086
12,388
73,993
86,381
276,918
19,125
296,043
63,056
10,762
73,818
43,741
1 7 ,481
61,222
~
r-
o
",
Z
::0
",
CJ)
",
)0
::0
(")
:I:
(")
o
::0
~
::0
~
o
z
-------
TABLE II
EMISSIONS INVENTORY SUMMARY
FOR THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, CENTRAL NEW HAMPSHIRE INTRASTATE AIR QUALITY
CONTROL REGION - DATA REPRESENTATI VE OF CALENDAR YEAR 1970
Source Category Tons of Pollutant/Year Fuel Etc.
Part S02 CO HC NOx Quantity Uni ts
I. Fuel Combustion
A. Residential Fuel-Area Source
1. Coal 3 11 12 3 1 484 tons
2. Di still ate Oi 1 181 1,303 90 54 217 36,188 thou gal
3. Natural Gas 0
4. Wood
5. Other
U) 6. Total 184 1 ,314 102 57 218
U1
B. Comm-Instl & Ind
1. a. Coal-Area Source 10 15 9 2 2 436 tons
b. Coal-Point Source 13 64 7 2 4 1 ,300 tons
2. Coke-Point Source
3.a. Distillate Oil-Area Source 32 153 0 6 128 4,251 thou gal
b. Distillate Oil-Point Source 1 6 0 0 3 90 thou gal
4.a. Residual Oil-Area Source 14 214 0 2 37 1 ,227 thou gal
b. Residual Oil-Point Source 21 331 0 3 55 1 ,819 thou gal
5.a. Natural Gas-Area Source 0
~ b. Natural Gas-Point Source O
r 6. Process Gas-Point Source
c 7.a. Wood-Area Source 1 0 0 0 0 61 tons
I'T1
z b. Wood-Point Source 46 0 8 4 17 3,809 tons
:::tI
I'T1 8.a. Propane-Area Source 0 0 0 1 2 128 thou gal
CJ)
I'T1 b. Other-Point Source
)10
:::tI 9. Total 138 783 24 20 248
("')
:I:
("') C. Steam-Electric Power Plant
0
:::tI
" 1. Anthraci te Coal
0
:::tI 2. Bituminous Coal
)10
-I
0
Z
-------
TABLE II (Cont.)
Source Ca~egory Tons of Poll utant/Year Fuel Etc.
Part S02 CO HC NOx Quantity Units
I. C. Steam-Electric Power Plant
3. Distillate Oil
4. Res i dual Oi 1
5. Natural Gas
6. Other
7. Total
D. Total Fuel Combustion' 322 2,097 126 77 466
'II.. Process Losses
A. Area Sources (Solvents) 0 0 0 1 ,101 0 1 ,101 tons
B. Point Sources 39 0 0 225 0
III. Solid Waste Disposal
(N A. Incineration
0\
La. On Site-Area Source 94 20 134 40 40 26,814 tons
b. On Site-Point Source
2. Municipal, Etc.-Point Source 7 0 12 29 1 917 tons
B. Open Burning
1. a. On Site-Area Source 27 2 143 51 10 3,369 tons
b. On Site-Point Source
2.a. Dumps-Area Source
~ b. Dumps-Point Source 533 34 2,818 997 214 66,432 tons
,... C. 1. Other-Area Source
c
ITI 2. Other-Point Source
z
:0 Total Solid Waste Disposal
ITI D. 661 56 3 ,1 07 1,117 265
CJ)
ITI
,.
:0
(')
:I:
(')
0
:0
~
0
:0
,.
-j
0
z
-------
Source Category
TABLE II (Cont.)
Tons of Pollutant/Year Fuel Etc.
Part S02 CO HC NOx Quantity Un its
129 78 31 ,154 5,605 4,301 392 mil vehic1e-
miles
19 35 252 50 263 1 ,548 thou gal
18 10 47 10 15 13 thou LTO
o 1 1 0 1 17 thou gal
o
0 0 0 356 0 356 tons
166 124 31,454 6,021 4,580
IV. Transportation-Area Source
A.1. Motor Vehicles-Gasoline
W
'-I
2. Motvr Vehicles-Diesel
B. Off-Highway Fuel Usage
C. Ai rcraft
D. Rai 1 road
E. Vessel s
F. Gasoline Hnd1g Evap. Losses
G. Other
H. Total Transportation
V. Miscellaneous-Area Sources
A. Agricultural Burning
B. Other
C. Total Miscellaneous
VI. Grand Total
A. Area Source
B. Point Source
C. Total
510
678
1,188
1 ,832
445
2,277
31,795
2,892
34,687
7,271
1 ,270
8,541
5,002
308
5,310
:e
»
,...
c
/TI
Z
::0
/TI
CII
/TI
»
::0
(')
::r
(')
o
::0
"
o
::0
»
-t
o
Z
-------
TABLE II I
EMISSIONS INVENTORY SUMr~RY
FOR THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, ANDROSCOGGIN VALLEY INTERSTATE AIR QUALITY
CONTROL REGION - DATA REPRESENTATIVE OF CALENDAR YEAR 1970
Tons of Pollutant/Year Fuel, etc.
Source Category Part. S02 CO HC NOx Quantity Units
I. Fuel Combustion
A. Residential Fuel-Area Source
1. Coa 1 2 6 7 2 1 276 tons
2. Distillate Oil 97 698 48 29 116 19,390 thou gal
3. Natural Gas
4. Wood
5. Other
eN 6. Total 99 704 55 31 117
(» B. Comm-Instl and lnd
1. a. Coal-Area Source 4 6 4 1 0 173 tons
b.. Coal-Point Soufce
2. Coke-Point Source.
3. a. Distillate Oil-Area Source 12 60 0 2 50 1,669 thou gal
b. Distillate Oil-Point Source 2 7 0 0 .6 207 thou gal
4. a. Residual Oil-Area Source 5 95 0 1 15 496 thou gal
b. Residual Oil-Point Source 986 14,386 9 129 2,572 85,745 thou gal
5. a. Natural Gas-Area Source
b. Natural Gas-Point Source
~ 6. Process Gas-Point Source
:a- 7. a. Wood-Area Source* 0 0 0 0 0 20
r tons
o
".. b. Wood-Point Source
:z
::II 8. a. Other-Area Source 0 0 0 1 2 89 thou gal
"..
CJ'J b. Other-Point Source
"..
:a- 9. Total 1,009 14,554 13 134 2,645
::II
(")
:x:
(")
C> *
::0
-0 Less than 1/2 ton emissions
0
::0
).
~
0
7.
-------
TABLE III (Cont.)
Source Category Tons of Pollutant/Year Fuel Etc.
Part S02 CO HC NOx Quanti ty Un i ts
I. C. Steam-Electric Power Plant
1. Anthracite Coal
2. B i tumi nous Coal
3. Di still ate Oil
4. Res i dual Oi 1
5. Natural Gas
6. Other
7. Total
D. Total Fuel Combustion 1 , 1 08 15,258 68 165 2,762
II. Process Losses
A. Area Sources (Solvents) 0 0 0 514 0 514 tons
w B. Point Sources 6,000 291 250 220 0
\0
III. Solid Waste Disposal
A. Incineration
La. On Site-Area Source 46 10 65 20 20 1 3,099 tons
b. On Site-Point Source 0
2. Municipal, Etc.-Point Source 0
B. Open Burni ng
1. a. On Site-Area Source 14 1 73 26 5 1 ,726 tons
b. On Site-Point Source
~ 2.a. Dumps-Area Source
,... b. Dumps-Point Source 357 20 1 ,900 670 134 44,722 tons
o
FT1
Z C. 1. Other-Area Source
::a
FT1 2. Other-Point Source
en
FT1
)00 D. Total Solid Waste Disposal 417 31 2,038 716 159
::a
"
:I:
"
0
::a
~
0
::a
)00
-I
0
Z
-------
TABLE III (Cont.)
Source Category Tons of Pollutant/Year Fuel Etc.
Part S02 CO HC NOx Quantity Units
I V. Transportation-Area 'Source
A. 1. Motor Vehicles-Gasoline 63 38 15,259 2,745 2 , 1 06 192 mil vehic1e-
miles
2. Motor Vehicles-Diesel 13 24 175 35 183 1 ,078 thou gal
B. Off-Highway Fuel Usage
C. Aircraft*
D. Rai 1 road 0 0 0 0 0 11 thou gal
E. Vessels 0
F. Gasoline Hnd1g Evap. Losses 0 0 0 174 0 174 tons
G. Other
H. Total Transportation 76 62 15,434 2,954 2,289
~
0 V. Miscellaneous-Area Sources
A. Agricultural Burning
B. Other
C. Total Miscellaneous
VI. Grand Total
A. Area Source 256 938 15,631 3,550 2,498
B. Point Source 7,345 14,705 2 ,1 59 1 ,019 2,713
C. Total 7 ,601 15,643 17,790 4,569 5,211
~
r
o
IT!
Z
::0
IT!
VI
IT!
»
::0
(')
:I:
(')
o *
~ Less
o
::0
»
-t
o
Z
than 1/2 ton emissions
-------
TABLE IV
FUEL PARAMETERS
Fuel. Sulfur Ash
(percent) (percent)
Northern New Hampshire
Coal
Bituminous 2.60 10.0
Anthracite 0.70 10.6
Residual Oil 2.40
Di sti 11 ate Oi 1 0.50
Natural Gas 0.001 Neg.
Central and Southern
New Hampshire
Coal
Bituminous 2.60 10.0
Anthraci.te 0.70 10.6
Res i dual Oil 2.20
Distillate Oil 0.50
Natural Gas 0.001 Neg.
41
WALDEN RESEARCH CORPORATION
-------
TABLE V
DISTRIBUTION OF SOLVENT SALES
Use Reactive Non-Reactive
Paint
Industrial 100% solvent base 0% water base
Trade 35% solvent base 65% water base
Dry Cleaning 10% stoddard solvent 90% perchlorethylene
Degreasing 85% trichlorethylene 15% trichlorethane
TABLE VI
HYDROCARBON EMISSION INVENTORY FOR SOUTHERN NEW HAMPSHIRE
Emissions (tons/yr)
Source Category Reactive Non-Reactive Total
Transportation. 49,454 0 49,454
Fuel Combustion 982 0 982
Solid Waste Disposal 6,402 0 6,402
Organic Solvent Users 6,991 2,457 9,448
Industrial Process 4,432 0 4,432
Gasoline Marketing 3 , 1 00 0 3 , 1 00
TOTAL 71 ,361 2,457 73,818
42
WALDEN RESEARCH CORPORATION
------- |