71-30
    Exhaust Emission Analysis of the
Williams Research Gas Turbine Volkswagen
                May 1971
           Leonard D. Verrelli
Bureau of Mobile Source Pollution Control
         Office of Air Programs
     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

-------
Vehicle Tested



The Williams Gas Turbine, 131-Q, regenerative turbine auto-



motive engine was mounted in a 1965 Volkswagen squareback




test bed.  The engine utilizes a two stage turbine to



develop 70 horsepower.  It incorporates the standard VW



automatic transmission coupled to the engine through a gear



reduction system.  Non-leaded gasoline was used as fuel for



these tests.






Test Conducted



The standard 1972 Federal test procedure using the LA 4-S4



driving cycle with constant volume sampling was used.






The 1200 cfm CVS used for this test was modified slightly



by blocking off the CVS filters and drawing dilution air



from the room with mixing occurring at the vehicle exhaust



outlet.






Oxides of nitrogen were measured using both the wet chemical




modified Saltzman technique and the chemiluminescence



instrument.  Carbon monoxide was measured using non-dispersive



infrared and hydrocarbons were determined using both the



cold and hot flame ionization detector.  Concentrations of



all pollutants were measured in the CVS bag and hydrocarbon



concentration was monitored continuously in the raw exhaust



using the hot flame ionization detector.

-------
                          - 2 -

Emission Results

The normal practice of subtracting the concentration of the

background hydrocarbons in the dilution air from the hydro-

carbon concentration measured in the CVS bag could not be

used in this study.  When sampling from low emission

vehicles the hydrocarbons in the dilution air can contribute

a major portion of the total hydrocarbons and the straight

subtraction correction is no longer rigorous.  Since the

volume flow of the engine was known an alternate more

correct calculation procedure could be used.


The concentration  (Ct) of the diluted sample in the CVS bag

can be expressed as follows:         !

                 Ct = Ce Y^ + Cb ^ "' Ve         (!)
                         Vt        Vt

Where:

    Ct = concentration of total sample in bag

    Ce = concentration of integrated undiluted exhaust
         volume

    Cb = concentration of background contaminant dilution
         air

    Vt = volume of total sample (exhaust plus dilution air)

    Ve = volume of exhaust


Equation (1) can be rearranged solving for concentration

of exhaust  (Ce):

                               Vt - Ve
                 Ce = (Ct - Cb —ITT	-)

-------
                          - 3 -


The weight of emission (gm/mi)  of each pollutant is obtained

from:


    W = K Ce
        Where:  K = constant relating weight of emission
                    to volume of exhaust per mile


              Ve  = volume of exhaust per mile



Four LA 4-S4 tests were run, there was one aborted test

because of a leaking exhaust manifold.  There is some

question to the validity of test #1 due to suspected sample

contamination.



In Table 1 comparisons are made of all three tests using
                                     !
the 1972 Federal test procedure. . Hydrocarbons in tests #2

and #3 are consistent, but in test #1' the value is consider-


ably higher possibly reflecting the hydrocarbon contamination

mentioned above.  Carbon monoxide data is inconsistent, and

nitrogen oxides also show a slight inconsistency.



In keeping with report policy for tests such as these


oxides of nitrogen will be reported as N02 and an overall

value will be arrived at by averaging two sets of data.



Conclusions

By averaging two sets of data it was determined that the

test vehicle did meet the 1975 standards; however, it should

be noted that some slight inconsistencies do exist.

-------
                          - 4 -




Because a new combustor design had been incorporated in the




engine it was unadvisable at this time to perform a larger



number of tests.  Until such a series of tests can be



performed to substantiate the data collected during this



short test, a positive determination of emission levels



cannot be made.






The driveability of this turbine car did not compare to a



conventional internal combustion engine vehicle.  Very



little engine retardation was evident; acceleration was



smooth but not rapid.

-------
                          Table  1


                 1972 Federal Test Procedure

HC gpm
CO gpm
C02 gpm
NO gpm
NO 2 gpm
Test #1*
12-1448
.89
1.78
1086.5
1.44
2.21
Test #2
12-1449E
.36
5.4
1094.5
• 1.55
2.30
Test #3
12-1455
.32
3.6
988.4
1.27
1.95
Average of tests #2 and #3:

 HG gpm          CO gpm          NO2 gpm             NOX**

   .34             4.5             2.12             1.81


NOX corrected for Humidity:

     Test #1               Test #2              Test #3

       1.92                 1.97                 1.65
gpm indicates calculated mass in grams per mile.
* not used in calculations because of possible effect from
  the sample contamination on emissions;

** NOX corrected for humidity.

-------