MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE
                                                  REPORT
                       OPEN DUST SOURCES AROUND
                         IRON AND STEEL PLANTS
                            SPECIAL REPORT
                              ADDENDUM
                             Prepared for:

               Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory
                     Environmental Protection Agency
                         Research Triangle Park
                          North Carolina  27711

                     Under Contract No. 68-02-2120
                         MRI Project No. 4123-L
                            Special Report
                    Date Prepared:  February 4, 1977
                                 by

                       Midwest Research Institute
                         425 Volker Boulevard
                      Kansas City, Missouri  64110
MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE 425 VOLKER BOULEVARD, KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI 64110  •  816753-7600

-------
MRI-NORTH STAR DIVISION 3100 38th Avenue South, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55406 • 612 721-6373
MRI WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005- 1522 K STREET, N.W. • 202 293-3800

-------
                                                          600R77009
                         OPEN DUST SOURCES AROUND
                           IRON AND STEEL PLANTS
                               SPECIAL REPORT
                                  ADDENDUM

                                Prepared for:

                Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory
                       Environmental Protection Agency
                            Research Triangle Park
                             North Carolina  27711
                       Under Contract No. 68-02-2120
                           MRI  Project No. 4123-L
                               Special Report
                      Date Prepared:  February 4, 1977
                                    by

                         Midwest  Research Institute
                            425 Volker Boulevard
                        Kansas City, Missouri  64110
MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE  425 VOLKER BOULEVARD, KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI 64110 • 816753-7600

-------
                                PREFACE
This report addendum was prepared for the Environmental Protection Agency
(Mr. Robert V. Hendriks, Project Officer) to present the results of a sur-
vey of open dust sources around an iron and steel plant.  The work was per-
formed in the Environmental and Materials Sciences Division of Midwest
Research Institute under EPA Contract No. 68-02-2120.  This report was
written by Dr. Chatten Cowherd and Mr. Russell Bohn.
Approved:

MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE'
L. J. Shannon, Director
Environmental and Materials
  Sciences Division
February 4, 1977
                                     11

-------
                           TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0       Introduction 	  1

2.0       Unpaved Roads  	  1

               2.1  Source Extent  	  1
               2.2  Correction Parameters  	  4

3.0       Aggregate Storage Piles  	  5

               3.1  Loading Onto Piles	7
               3.2  Vehicular Traffic  	  7
               3.3  Wind Erosion	8
               3.4  Load-out	9

4.0       Wind Erosion of Exposed Areas	9

5.0       Summary of Dust Emissions	10

References	'14



                             List of Tables


No.                              Title                                Page

 1        Experimentally Determined Fugitive Dust Emission Factors  .  .  2

 2        Plant D - Road Emissions	3

 3        Plant D - Storage Pile Emissions 	  6

 4        Plant D - Open Area Emissions	11

 5        Plant D - Summary of Open Dust Source Emissions	12

 6        Plant D - Unit Emissions	13
                                     iii

-------
1.0  Introduction

     Significant quantities of fugitive dust may be emitted from storage
     piles, vehicular traffic, and wind erosion of exposed areas around
     iron and steel plants.  Reliable estimates of these emissions require
     the use of (a) data on source extent and/or activity levels and
     (b) emission factors which have been appropriately corrected for local
     climatic conditions and silt (fines) content of the emitting surface.

     Table 1 lists the measures of source extent, the basic emission fac-
     tor formulae, and the correction parameters associated with each per-
     tinent source category.  The mathematical expressions for each emis-
     sion factor were derived from field measurements described in reports
                                                  1-3 /
     prepared by Midwest Research Institute (MRI).	   Supporting informa-
     tion for several of these factors is presented in EPA's Emission Fac-
     tor Handbook.—  The factors presented in Table 1 describe emissions
     of particles smaller than 30 u in diameter, the approximate effective
     cutoff diameter of a standard high volume particulate sampler (based
     on particle density of 2 to 2.5 g/cnr).—'

     This report presents the results of a survey of open dust sources at
     a representative iron and steel plant, designated as Plant D.  Sur-
     vey results and procedures are given below for each source category,
     following the format used in the report for Plants A and B, dated
     November 2, 1976, and in the report for Plant C, dated January 11,
     1977.
2.0  Unpaved Roads

     Table 2 lists source extent and activity factors, emission factor cor-
     rection parameters, and calculated emission rates for specific unpaved
     roads lying within the property boundaries of Plant D.  The plant had
     no paved roads within its boundaries.

     The experimentally determined emission factors for unpaved roads given
     in Table 1, with an additional correction for vehicle weight, were
     used to calculate fugitive dust emissions.  The appropriate measure
     of source extent is vehicle-miles traveled.
2.1  Source Extent

     The following steps were used to develop the inventory of roads, ve-
     hicle types, and mileage traveled:

-------
                   Table 1.   EXPERIMENTALLY DETERMINED  FUGITIVE DUST EMISSION FACTORS
                                                              a/
Source category

Aggregate storage
 (sand and gravel;
 crushed stone)

Unpaved roads
Paved roads
Wind erosion
    Measure of extent

Tons of aggregate put
  through storage cycle
Vehicle-miles traveled
  (light duty)
Vehicle-miles traveled
  (light duty)
Acre-years of exposed
  land
 Emission factor—
   (Ib/unit of
  source extent)

      0.33
    (PE/100)2
0-49 
-------
                                                   Table 2.  PLANT D - ROAD EMISSIONS
Roads
Unpaved

Road length-'
(miles)
10.6
Source extent
Vehicle class:
Light Duty A
Medium Duty B
Heavy Duty C
A
B
C

Vehicle-miles
traveled'1
(miles/day)
720
WO
120

Vehicle weight
correction
(based on
observation)
1.0
3.5
8.0
Correction factors
Vehicle speed-'
(mph)
20
20
15

Road surface
silt content—'
(%>
10
10
10

Emission
factor
(Ib/VMT)
2.3
8.1
13.7
Emissions-
Dally
emissions
(tons /day)
0.8
1.8
0.8

Yearly
emissions
(tons/year)
292
657
292
  Total
               10.6
                                                 1,280
                                                                                                                                     3.4
                                                                                                                                                   1,241
a_/ Determined from plant map.
b/ Data obtained from plant personnel.
c_/ Assumed value.
d/ All emissions are based on partlculates less than 30 n  In diameter.

-------
     1.   Unpaved road segments with specific  surface  and  traffic  charac-
         teristics were identified by plant personnel,  and  the  length of
         each segment was determined from a map of the  plant.

     2. •  The types and sizes of the vehicles  traveling  on unpaved roads
         were specified by plant personnel.

     3.   Figures on the daily mileages traveled by each vehicle type were
         furnished by plant personnel.

     All  of the roads at Plant D boundary are slag surfaced.  As  indicated
     in Table 2, total unpaved road mileage within the  plant  is 10.6 miles.
     These roads were indicated to be in good condition throughout the
     plant and to be regularly maintained.

     Vehicular traffic at Plant D was comprised of three  basic  vehicle
     types:

     *  Type A - light duty, 36 vehicles (automobiles and pickup trucks).

     *  Type B - medium duty, 22 vehicles (flatbeds and other medium
                 sized trucks).

     *  Type C - heavy duty, 6 vehicles (larger trucks  with load capacity
                 greater than 25 tons).

     As indicated by plant personnel, these vehicles  travel over all the
     unpaved roads in the plant.  Thus, no specific plant road  segments
     were identified as having higher than average traffic  volumes.

2.2  Correction Parameters

     Because of adverse weather conditions during the time  of the survey,
     it was not possible to obtain representative samples of road surface
     dust from which to determine silt content.  Therefore, a silt content
     of 10% for the road surface material was assumed.   Average vehicle
     speed was estimated by plant personnel and the number of dry days per
     year for the plant locale was determined from the  Climatic Atlas.—'

     Because the experimentally determined emission factors for unpaved
     roads were developed for light duty vehicles, it was necessary to
     apply vehicle weight correction multipliers to account for increased
     emissions from medium duty and heavy duty vehicles.   It was assumed
     that emissions increase in proportion to vehicle weight.  Ratio of
     average empty truck weights to average light duty vehicle weight
     (4 tons) were used as correction multipliers, because trucks travel
     at higher speeds during the unloaded portions of travel cycles.

-------
3.0  Aggregate Storage Piles

     An inherent part of the operation of integrated  iron and  steel  plants
     is the maintenance of outdoor storage piles  of mineral  aggregates
     used as raw materials, and  of process wastes.  Storage  piles  are usually
     left uncovered,  partially because of the  necessity  for  frequent trans-
     fer of material  into or out of storage.

     Dust emissions  occur at several points in the storage cycle—during
     loading of material onto the pile, whenever  the  pile is acted on by
     strong wind currents, and during load-out of material from the  pile.
     Truck and loading equipment traffic  in the storage  pile areas are
     also a substantial source of dust emissions.

     Table 3 gives data on the extent of  open  storage operations involving
     primary aggregated materials at Plant D.   This information was  devel-
     oped from (a) discussions with plant personnel,  (b)  plant statistics
     on quantities of materials  consumed, and  (c) field  estimations  during
   ,  the plant survey.

     The emission factor for aggregate storage piles  given in  Table  1 was
     derived from field measurements of dust emissions from  active and  in-
     active storage  piles of sand, gravel,  and crushed stone.  The  major
     operational contributions to storage pile emissions  were  found  to  be:

     1.  Loading onto piles from dumptrucks,

     2.  Vehicular traffic around piles during 90-day storage,

     3.  Wind erosion during 90-day storage, and

     4.  Load-out from piles to  dumptrucks utilizing  high loaders.

     As expected, the quantity of emissions is directly  proportional to
     the amount of material put  through the storage cycle.
     Because aggregate storage operations in the iron and steel industry are
     similar to operations described above, the experimentally determined
     emission factor and operational contributions were used as a basis for
     the development of estimated emission factors for each material/operation
     combination.  In each case, the factor was adjusted to the content of
     silt (fines) in the given aggregate and to the degree of material-
     handling equipment activity in comparison with the operations used in
     the sand and gravel and crushed stone industries.

-------
                                           Table 3.   P1ANT D - STORAGE PILE EMISSIONS




Material
in
storage
low vola-
tility
coal
High vola-
tility
coal
Iron ore
pellets
Screened
iron ore
Coke breeze
Screened
limestone/
dolomite
Dolomite
stone
Total

Source
Amoun t
In
storage
(tons)—


25,000


30,000

50,000

66,600
40,000


5,000

12,000
216,600

extent Correction factors
Annual Duration
thruput Silt of Load-in
(million content storage (Ib/ton
tons)^ (%)-' (days)^' stored)


0.05 5.5 180 0.2


0.06 2 360 0.1

1.8 13 10 0.3

.0.4 19 60 0.5
0.04 7 90 0.2


0.14 9^ 13 0.2

0.04 1.5-' 45 0.04
2.49
Emission factors-
Total
Vehicular Wind storage
traffic erosion Load-out cycle
(Ib/ton (Ib/ton (Ib/ton (Ib/ton
stored) stored) stored) stored)


0.3 ' 0.9 0.2 1.6


0.1 0.7 0.1 1.0

0.7 0.1 0.5 1.6

£' 1.1 0.7 2.3
0.7 0.6 0.3 1.8


0.9 0.1 0.3 1.5

0.1 O.I 0.1 0.4




Yearly
emissions
(tons/year)


40


30

1,440

460
36


105

a
2,119
a/ Data obtained from plant personnel.
b/ Assumed silt content based on sieving of similar materials.
£/ Calculated from data obtained from plant personnel.
d/ Assumed value.
e/ Determined negligible.
I/ All emissions are based on participates less than 30 u in diameter.

-------
     During the survey, weather conditions prohibited the collection of
     representative samples of the storage.materials to be analyzed for
     silt content.  Storage pile silt content values were assumed to be
     the same as the values obtained for similar materials previously sized
     at other steel plants.

     Table 3 presents the emission factors for the storage of primary aggre-
     gate materials used in integrated iron and steel plants.  The rationale
     for the derivation of the emission factor expression for each operation
     is given below.
3.1  Loading Onto Piles

     The method of loading onto storage piles at Plant D consisted of uti-
     lizing front-end loaders for the coke breeze and screened stone piles;
     a stacker for the iron pellet piles; and an overhead gantry/clamshell
     drop for the screened iron ore, large stone, and for the coal piles.
     The front-end loader and gantry drop method of loading onto the piles
     is considered comparable to the operations for which field measure-
     ments were performed.  The stacker method of pile formation was judged
     to emit less dust than the emission-tested load-in process, so an activ-
     ity factor of 0.75 was incorporated into the load-in emission factor
     equation.  Based on these assumptions, the following equation was used
     to derive emission factors for the procedure of pile load-in:

                          EFX = 0.04 (S/1.5) K

     where     EFi = emission factor (Ib/ton of material transferred)

              0.04 = experimentally determined emission factor for loading
                       of sand and gravel
                   x
                 S = silt content of given aggregate material  (percent)

               1.5 = silt content of emission-tested material  (percent)

                 K = activity factor (0.75 for iron pellets, 1.0 for all
                       other materials)

3.2  Vehicular Traffic

     Vehicular traffic around emission-tested aggregated storage piles,
     consisting of truck and high-loader movements associated with
     load-in and load-out, was generally more intense than traffic
     around storage piles at the iron and steel plant.  The following
     stored aggregate materials were assigned a reduced traffic-related
     activity factor:

-------
               Screened iron ore:  K = 0 (no vehicular traffic)

                Iron ore pellets:  K = 0.5

                            Coal:  K = 0.5

                     Large stone:  K = 0.5

     The coal, coke breeze, and screened stone storage piles at Plant D
     were worked in a manner similar to the emission-tested aggregate,
     and were thus assigned a K-factor of 1.

     Based on these considerations, emission factors for traffic around
     the storage piles were calculated using the following equation:


                              - 0.13 (S/1.5)
                          C,Cn ~           „— JS.
                            2     (PE/100)2

      where    EF9 = emission factor (Ib/ton of material stored)

                PE = "Thornthwaites precipitation-evaporation index (93)

                 S = silt content of given aggregate material (percent)

                 K = activity factor

     The value 0.13 Ib/ton was the factor experimentally determined for
     vehicle-generated emissions around the emission-tested aggregate
     piles.  These test piles had an average silt content of 1.5% and the
     area where the testing occurred had a PE index of 100.


3.3  Wind Erosion

     The correction factors deemed to be appropriate for dust emissions
     generated by wind erosion were silt content, PE index, and length of
     time material is in storage.  The silt content and PE index were ra-
     tioed in the same manner as for the traffic-related factor.  Because
     the relationship of emissions to duration in storage was assumed to
     be linear, the correction multiplier is simply a direct ratio between
     the duration of given material in storage, and the 90-day estimate of
     duration for emission-tested aggregate materials.  These assumptions
     are incorporated into the following equation:

-------
                                 (PE/100)2

     where     S = silt content of given stored material  (percent)

              PE = Thornthwaites precipitation-evaporation index  (93)

               D = duration of material in storage (days)

     The value 0.11 Ib/ton was the factor experimentally determined for wind
     erosion from piles with a silt content of 1.5% stored for 90 days in
     a locality having a PE index of 100.
3.4  Load-out
     The method of loading out from the piles at Plant D consisted of uti-
     lizing either a front-end loader pickup and dump into a conveyor bin
     (coal, ore pellets, coke breeze, and stone piles) or a gantry/clamshell
     removal and dump into a rail hopper car (iron ore) which released the
     material onto an undergound conveyor.  The activity level (K-factor)
     for these two methods was judged to be similar in nature to the
     emission-tested load-out process.

     Based on these considerations, emission factors for aggregate load-out
     were calculated by the following equation:
                          EF/ = O.Q5  v~, I..-, v
                            4.              '  Js.
                                   (PE/100)2

     where     EF4 = emission factor  (Ib/ton of material  stored)

                 S = silt content  of  stored material  (percent)

                PE = Thornthwaites precipitation-evaporation  index  (93)

                 K = activity factor  =  1

     The value 0.05 Ib/ton was the factor experimentally  determined for
     load-out of storage piles with a silt content of 1.5% in a locality
     having a PE index of 100.


4.0  Wind Erosion of Exposed Areas

     Unsheltered areas of bare ground around plant facilities are subject
     to atmospheric dust generation by wind erosion, whenever the wind ex-
     ceeds the threshold velocity  of  about 12 mph.  The bare ground area

-------
     within the boundaries of Plant D was estimated to be 10% of the  plant
     property, based on discussions with plant personnel during the plant
     survey.  To account for the sheltering effect of plant structures,  the
     effective exposed area was taken to be 7.5% of the plant property.

     As indicated in Table 1, the parameters which influence the amount  of
     dust generation by wind erosion are soil erodibility,  silt content  of
     the surface soil, precipitation-evaporation index, and fraction  of
     the time wind speed exceeds 12 mph.  The soil erodibility factor (47)
     and the surface silt content (15%)  were derived from previous  sieving
     of similar surface soil materials at another steel plant.  Thornthwaites
     precipitation-evaporation index for Plant D was determined to be 93.—
     Finally, the value for the fraction of time the wind speed was greater
     than 12 mph (25%) was obtained from weather records.-  The results
     from wind erosion of Plant D's exposed areas are presented in  Table 4.
5.0  Summary of Dust Emissions

     A breakdown of calculated emissions from open dust sources at Plant D
     is presented in Table 5.   For Plant D,  the largest contributing source
     was the iron ore pellet piles.  Unpaved roads were also a major contrib-
     utor to Plant D's dust emissions inventory.   The remaining sources  have
     relatively minor impact.   Table 6 gives Plant D's emissions from open
     dust sources, stated on a per ton of steel produced basis.  Expressing
     emissions in this manner is useful when comparing the emissions from
     steel plants of various sizes.
                                     10

-------
                                                      Table 4.  PI ANT D - OPEN AREA EMISSIONS
Wind erosion
Plant D open areas

Total
plant
area
(acres)
1.1003-7
Source extent
Total
open
area
(acres)

Effective
open area
fraction
0.75*/

Soil
credibility
(tons/acre -year)
47k/
Correction
factors
Surface soil
silt content
(I)
IS*/


Mind
id/
speed—'
0.25

PE
Index^
93

Emission
f ac tor
(Ib/acre-year)
917
Emissions-'
Dally
emissions
(tons/day)
0.1

Yearly
emissions
(tons/year)S'
37
a/ Data obtained from plant personnel.
b/ Based on sieving of similar materials.
c/ Assumed value.
d_/ Fraction of the time the wind speed Is greater than 12 mph.
e_/ Thornthwaltes precipitation-evaporation Index
{_/ Based on participates less than 30 u In diameter.
g/ Yearly emissions = dally emissions multiplied by number of dry days per year.

-------
       Table 5.  PLANT D - SUMMARY OF OPEN DUST SOURCE EMISSIONS


                                                                 Percentage
           Source              Tons of particulate per year—      of total

1.  Unpaved roads                         1,241                      37

2.  Wind erosion - open areas                37                       1

3.  Storage piles

      Low/high volatility coal               70                       2
      Iron ore pellets                    1,440                      42
      Screened iron ore                     460                      14
      Coke breeze                            36                       1
      Stone piles                           113                     	3

  Total all open sources                  3,397                     100
a/ Based on particles less than 30 u in diameter.
                                     12

-------
               Table 6.  PIANT D - UNIT EMISSIONS
                                Pounds of particulates— per
	Source	       short ton of steel produced

Unpaved roads                               1.7

Wind erosion - open areas                   0.1

Storage piles                               2.8

  Total                                     4.6
a/ Based on particles less than 30 u in diameter.
                                 13

-------
                              REFERENCES
1.  Cowherd, C., Jr., K.  Axetell,  Jr.,  C.  M.  Guenther,  and G.  A.  Jutze,
      Development of Emission Factors for  Fugitive Dust Sources,  EPA
      Publication No-. EPA-450/3-74-037, June  1974.

2.  Cowherd, C., Jr., C.  M.  Guenther, D. Nelson,  and N. Stich, Quantifica-
      tion of Dust Entrainment From Paved  Roadways, Final Report  Draft,
      EPA Contract No. 68-02-1403  (Task 7), March 31, 1976.

3.  Cowherd, C., Jr., C.  M.  Guenther, D. Nelson,  and K. Walker, Develop-
      ment of a Methodology and Emission Inventory For  Fugitive Dust For
      the Regional Air Pollution Study, EPA Publication No.  EPA-450/3-
      76-003, January 1976.

4.  Compilation of Air Pollution Emission  Factors, U.S. Environmental
      Protection Agency,  Publication AP-42, October 1975.

5.  Climatic Atlas of the United States, U.S.  Department of Commerce,
      Environmental Science Services Administration, Environmental  Data
      Service, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington,  D.C., June
      1968.
                                  14

-------