EPA-670/2-73-053-6

August 1973
                      Environmental Protection Technology Series
                           RECOMMENDED  METHODS OF
          REDUCTION, NEUTRALIZATION, RECOVERY OR

                      DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
                               Volume V Pesticide and Cyanide
                                  Office of Research and Development
                                 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                                          Washington, D.C. 20460

-------
                                           EPA-670/2-73-053-6
                                           August 1973
              RECOMMENDED METHODS OF

        REDUCTION, NEUTRALIZATION, RECOVERY

          OR DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE

    Volume V.  National  Disposal  Site Candidate
    Waste Stream Constituent Profile Reports -
         Pesticides and  Cyanide Compounds
                        By
R.  S.  Ottinger, J.  L.  Blumenthal,  D.  F.  Dal  Porto,
     G. I.  Gruber,  M.  J.  Santy,  and C.  C.  Shih
                 TRW Systems Group
                  One Space Park
         Redondo Beach,  California  90278

              Contract No.  68-03-0089
            Program Element No.  1D2311

                 Project Officers

               Norbert B. Schomaker
                   Henry Johnson
   Solid and Hazardous Waste Research Laboratory
      National  Environmental Research Center
              Cincinnati, Ohio  45268
                   Prepared for
        OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
       U.S.  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
              WASHINGTON, D.C.   20460

-------
                              REVIEW NOTICE

     The Solid Waste Research Laboratory of the National Environmental
Research Center - Cincinnati, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has
reviewed this report and approved its publication.  Approval does not
signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of
this Laboratory or of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, nor does
mention of trade names of commercial products constitute endorsement or
recommendation for use.
     The text of this report is reproduced by the National Environmental
Research Center - Cincinnati in the form received from the Grantee; new
preliminary pages and new page numbers have been supplied.
                                       n

-------
                             FOREWORD
     Man and his environment must be protected from the adverse
effects of pesticides, radiation, noise and other forms of pollu-
tion, and the unwise management of solid waste.  Efforts to protect
the environment require a focus that recognizes the interplay between
the components of our physical environment—air, water, and land.
The National Environmental Research Centers provide this multidisci-
plinary focus through programs engaged in:

               a    studies on the effects of environmental
                    contaminants on man and the biosphere, and

               0    a search for ways to prevent contamination
                    and to recycle valuable resources.

     Under Section 212 of Public Law 91-512, the Resource Recovery
Act of 1970, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is charged
with preparing a comprehensive report and plan for the creation of
a system of National Disposal Sites for the storage and disposal of
hazardous wastes.  The overall program is being directed jointly by
the Solid and Hazardous Waste Research Laboratory, Office of Research
and Development, National Environmental Research Center, Cincinnati,
and the Office of Solid Waste Management Programs, Office of Hazard-
ous Materials Control.  Section 212 mandates, in part, that recom-
mended methods of reduction, neutralization, recovery, or disposal
of the materials be determined.  This determination effort has been
completed and prepared into this 16-volume study.  The 16 volumes
consist of profile reports summarizing the definition of adequate
waste management and evaluation of waste management practices for
over 500 hazardous materials.  In addition to summarizing the defini-
tion and evaluation efforts, these reports also serve to designate a
material as a candidate for a National Disposal Site, if the material
meets criteria based on quantity, degree of hazard, and difficulty of
disposal.  Those materials which are hazardous but not designated as
candidates for National Disposal Sites, are then designated as candi-
dates for the industrial or municipal disposal sites.
                                 A. W. Breidenbach, Ph.D., Director
                               National Environmental Research Center
                                          Cincinnati, Ohio
                                 in

-------
                             TABLE OF CONTENTS



                                 VOLUME V



                     NATIONAL DISPOSAL SITE CANDIDATE

                 WASTE STREAM CONSTITUENT PROFILE REPORTS


                     Pesticides and Cyanide Compounds


                                                                      Page
Pesticides
Aldrin (13), Chlordane (484), Dieldrin (149),  Endrin  (170),
  Heptachlor (496) 	     1

ODD (136), DDT (137), Benzene Hexachloride (55)   	    29

2,4-D (135)  . .  . .	    55

Demeton (491), Guthion (495), Methyl  Parathion (274),
  Parathion (321)  	    73

Dinitro Cresol (162)	101


Cyanides

Cadmium Cyanide (84), Calcium Cyanide (91),  Copper Cyanides  (120),
  Cuprous Cyanide (128),  Cyanide (129),  Lead Cyanide  (239),  Nickel
  Cyanide (295),  Potassium Cyanide (344),  Silver Cyanide  (370),
  Sodium Cyanide  (387), and Zinc Cyanide (457) 	   115

-------
                            PROFILE REPORTS ON
               HIGHLY CHLORINATED HYDROCARBON PESTICIDES

                          THE POLYCHLOROCYCLODIENES

              Aldrin (13). Chlordane. (484), Dieldrin (149).
                      Endrin (170), Heptachlor (496)

                                I.   GENERAL
                                Introduction

     The polychlorocyclodiene insecticides are hignly chlorinated cyclic
hydrocarbons with endomethylene structures prepared  by the Diels-Alder
diene reaction.  The development of these insecticides was largely the
result of the work of J.  Hyman and his associates dating from 1945,  although
chlordane is said to have been discovered  independently by Riemschneider
in Germany at about the same period.   '      The polychlorocyclodiene
insecticides are very extensively used for the control of grasshoppers,
cotton insects, household insects, and as soil insecticides.

     The polychlorocyclodiene insecticides have not  fared too well in
recent years as their tendencies for growth are being overcome by
obsolescence and by attrition owing to the competition from new products
which are more economical, less toxic to higher animals, and more readily
degradable.   The production figures for the aldrin-toxaphene group of
insecticides are as follows0449'1610:
                  Annual  Production (thousand Ib)
  I960       1961      1962       1963       1964      1965      1966      1967
90,671    103,763    106,276    105,986   105,296   118,832   130,470    120,183
In 1970 only 88,641,000 Ib of insecticides of the aldrin-toxaphene group
              1718
were produced.     The aldrin-toxaphene group includes all five poly-
chlorocyclodiene insecticides discussed in this Profile Report, and
toxaphene.  The production figures thus illustrate the rise and decline

-------
of these pesticides, especially when the total  organic pesticides market
is still rapidly growing.

                              Manufacture
     Aldrin.  The main method of producing aldrin is the reaction of
hexachlorocyclopentadiene with an excess of bicyclo-[2.2.1]-2,5-heptadiene
at 100 C1618:
                 H                                H      Cl
                       H   CS
                           Cl
Cl
'C!
                                 C!,
CO
The bicyclo-[2.2.1]-2,5-heptadiene required is obtained by the Diels-Alder
reaction between cyclopentadiene and acetylene at 250 to 360 C and 4  to 20
            1 fil R
atm pressure     :
                                                    H
                           CH
 Shell  Chemical  Company  at  Denver, Colorado, is the only U.S. producer of
 aldrin.1718
      Chlordane.   Chlordane  is manufactured by the reaction of hexachloro-
 cyclopentadiene with cyclopentadiene at 80 to 90 C to form hexachlorodi-
 cyclopentadiene (chlordene), followed by the subsequent chlorination of
 the  chlordene  at  50 to 80 C1618:

-------
                                                           H
                                                               4-  Cl,
                                 Cl
Velsicol  Chemical  Company at Marshall, Illinois is the only U.S. producer
of chlordane.

     Dieldrin.   Dieldrin is obtained in 90 percent yield  by the oxidation
of aldrin by organic  peracids or hydrogen peroxide in acetic acid.  Like
aldrin, the only U.S.  producer of dieldrin is Shell  Chemical  Company at
Denver, Colorado.
acid1617:
     Endrin.   Endrin  is  produced by the oxidation of isodrin  with peracetic
                           +   cmcooH -*
   Cl
whereas the insecticide  isodrin is obtained by the condensation of cyclo-
                                                                 1 fil R
pentadiene with  1,2,3,4,7,7-hexachlorobicyclo[2.2.1]-2,5-heptadiene    :
              H
                                                            H
    Cl
H

H
H

H
                                 H.,
Cl
H

-------
     Heptachlor.  Heptachlor  is produced by the substitutive chlorination
of chlordene.  The reaction proceeds at low temperatures and in the
                                                 1 fil R
presence of  silica gel or other similar catalysts     :
                                                                    HC8
  Ci
 Like endrin,  the  only  U.S.  producer of  heptachlor  is Velasciol Chemical
 Company  at  Memphis,  Tennessee.
                                    Uses
      Aldrin  is  a broad spectrum insecticide  used  for  the  control of insect
 pests of fruits, vegetables,  cotton,  and  as  a  soil  insecticide  and for
 soil  treatment.   Chlordane is used as an  agent to control various chewing
 pests and especially to protect nohmetallic  materials  from  termites under
 tropical  conditions, and also for the control  of  soil  insects and certain
.pests of vegetable and soil  crops.  Dieldrin is more  stable and residual
 than  aldrin  and is used in addition for the  control of grasshoppers,  insects
 of public health importance,  termites, and for mothproofing.  Endrin  is
 especially used for the control of lipidopterous  larvae attacking cotton,
 field,  and vegetable crops.   It is also used to control the black-currant
 bud mite, against which all  other insecticides are  ineffective, and as a
 zoocide.   Heptachlor has much the same spectrum of  effectiveness as chlordane
 and is  used  to  control soil-inhibiting pests such as  wireworms  and gray
 sugarbeet weevil, grasshoppers, and also  as  an insecticidal additive  to
 seed  disinfectants.   In recent years  the  more  effective heptachlor is
 gradually displacing chlordane?509'1618
                                     4

-------
                  Sources and Types of Pesticide Wastes
     The sources of pesticide wastes may include the following    :  (1)
pesticide manufacturers; (2) pesticide formulators; (3) pesticide whole-
salers; (4) professional applicators; (5) cooperage facilities that  re-
condition drum; (6) agricultural  users;  (7) government facilities that
store, transport, and use pesticides; (8) urban and suburban home and
garden users; (9) commercial and  industrial  processes including those from
rug and fabric treatment facilities manufacturing plants, hospital,  etc.

     In general, pesticide wastes can be classified as either diluted or
concentrated wastes.  Diluted pesticide waste include those generated in
the waste waters of the manufacturers, formulators, agricultural runoffs,
and possibly spent caustic solutions used to clean empty pesticide con-
tainers.  Concentrated pesticide  wastes include any unused or contaminated
pesticides, pesticide materials left in containers after emptying, sludges
formed in treating waste water containing pesticides, sawdust or straw used
to soak up accidental pesticide spills.

     Polychlorocyclodiene pesticides appear as waste stream constituents
in varied forms and compositions.  Typical waste streams containing
heptachlor, chlordane, dieldrin and endrin are as follows:
     Aldrin containing liquid wastes from spill  cleanup and floor
     washings;
     Solid wastes  containing 0.5  percent aldrin;
     Aqueous  waste containing dieldrin  in the ppm range;
     Solid waste containing 0.5 percent dieldrin;
     Liquid waste  containing approximately 12 percent NaCl, 2  percent
     NaOCl, 2 percent NaOH  and chlordane in  the  ppm range;
     Solid waste containing 0.5 percent chlordane;
     Aqueous  waste containing 0.5 ppm heptachlor;
     Solid waste containing 0.5 percent heptachlor;
     Aqueous  slurry containing 2.5 percent heptachlor and
     10 percent diatomoceous earth;
     Solid waste containing 0.5 percent endrin.
More detailed  information  relating  to  the forms  and quantities of poly-
chlorocyclodiene  pesticides  is presented  in  Volume titled  "Waste Forms
and Quantities".
                                  5

-------
                     Physical and Chemical Properties
     The physical and chemical properties of aldrin, chlordane, dieldrin,
endrin, and heptachlor are included in the attached worksheets.  It should
be noted that dieldrin is the epoxide of aldrin, and endrin is the endo,
endo-isomer of dieldrin. Chlordane exists in two isomeric forms, the
a-trans and the B-cis.

                             2.  TOXICOLOGY
     The symptoms of polychlorocyclodiene pesticide  poisoning in insects
resemble those of DDT, and are displayed by hypersensitivity, hyperactivity
with violent bursts of convulsions, and finally complete prostration with
convulsive movements.  However, the site of these disturbances lies in the
ganglia of the central nervous system rather than in the peripheral nerves
as with DDT.  The precise biochemical lesion responsible for the toxic action
of the polychlorocyclodiene  insecticides is unknown, but it has been theorized
that it is related to the absorption and critical fit of the active compounds
into the  pores of nerve membranes to produce convulsant actio.n.  The poly-
chlorocyclodienes are all readily absorbed by the insect cuticle.

     All the polychlorocylodiene insecticides are toxic to higher animals
and poisoning could be caused by ingestion, inhalation, or absorption through
the skin.  The use of aldrin, dieldrin, and endrin is not permitted in the
Soviet Union.1618

     Acute poisoning of aldrin may cause renal damage, tremors, ataxia, and
convulsions followed by central nervous system depression, respiratory failure,
                                                          149?
and death.  Prolonged exposure may lead to hepatic damage.

     The fatal dose of chlordane to man is unknown, but has been estimated
to be between 6 and 60 gm.   Acute poisoning may be.characterized by
irritability, convulsions, and deep depression.  The dangerous chronic
 dose in man is also unknown, although it has been established that continued
ingestion causes degenerative changes in the li:y.er. .  .°-'1

-------
     The effects of dieldrin and aldrin are similar both quantitatively and
qualitatively in animals as well as in man.  Persons exposed to oral  dosages
which exceed 10 mg/kg frequently became acutely ill.  Symptoms may appear
within 20 minutes and in no instance has a latent period of more than 12
U             *•   A °766
hours been confirmed.

     Endrin exhibits toxic effects similar to aldrin and dieldrin.
     Acute poisoning of heptachlor may be characterized by tremors, ataxia,
convulsions, renal damage, respiratory failure, and death, the latter re-
sulting from ingestion of or skin contamination with 1 to 3 g.  There are
also some indications that like chlordane, chronic poisoning with small
                                 1492
dosages may cause hepatic damage.      Oxidation of heptachlor leads to the
more toxic epoxide, and the reaction takes place readily in animals and
Possibly in insects.  It is probable that the effect of heptachlor is based
on the reaction of its epoxide with the vital systems in animals and insects.

     The acute oral and dermal LDnn values of the polychlorocyclodiene in-
secticides to rats have all been well established (Table 1).  The acute oral
LDgg values range from 8 mg/kg body weight for endrin to 430 mg/kg body
weight for chlordane, and because all the polychlorocyclodiene insecticides
are readily absorbed through the skin, their dermal LD™ values are usually
                                                         1277
less than twice the corresponding acute oral LDgQ values.      The American
Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists 1971 recommended Threshold
                                            o            2?1}
Limit Values (TLV) for the compounds in mg/M  of air are    : aldrin, 0.25;
chlordane, 0.5;.dieldrin, 0.25; endrin, 0.1;• heptachlor, 0.5.
     The 48-hour Median Tolerance Limits (TL ) for the polychlorocyclodiene
insecticides for various types of fresh water organisms have been established
by the Federal Water Pollution Control Administration (Table 2). These data
are  indicative of  the water pollution  hazards associated with the use of the
polychlorocyclodiene insecticides.

     The oxidative conversion of aldrin and heptachlor to their much more
stable epoxides is an important reaction in both plant and animal tissues.
                                     7

-------
                                                         TABLE 1
                                     ACUTE ORAL AND DERMAL LD,n VALUES OF POLYCHLOROCYCLODIENE
                                                INSECTICIDES FOR WHITE
00
Insecticides

Aldrin
Chlordane
Dieldrin
Endrin
Heptachlor
Oral LD5Q
Males
39
335
46
18
100
(mg/kg) •
Females
60
430
46
8
162
Dermal
Males
98
840
90
18
195
LD5Q (mg/kg)
Females
98
690
60
15
250

-------
          TABLE 2
48-HOUR TL  VALUES FROM BIOASSY
         "m
 (in micrograms per liter)
                          536
Insecticides
Aldrin
Chlordane
v Dieldrin
Endrin
Heptachlor
Stream
Invertebrate
Species
P.
P.
P.
P.
P.
Californica
Californica
Californica
Californica
Badia
TLm
8
55
1.3
0.8
4
Cladocerans
Species
D.
S.
D.
D.
D.
Pulex
Serrulatus
Pulex
Pulex
Pulex
TLm
28
20
240
20
42
Fish
Species
Rainbow t.
Rainbow t.
Bluegill
Bluegill
Rainbow t.
TLm
3
10
3.4
0.2
9
Gammarus
Lacustris
TLm
12,000
80
1,000
4.7
100

-------
The half-lives of aldrin or heptachlor on alfalfa are less than one day,
but that of dieldrin is 7 days, and of heptachlor epoxide is 8 days.
Heptachlor fed to animals is concentrated about 20 times and stored as
heptachlor epoxide.  All the other polychlorocyclodiene insecticides are
                                              0449
also stored in the body fat in various levels.     Epoxidation and accu-
mulation in animal tissues of these insecticides lead to undesirable bio-
logical magnification in food chain organisms, thus posing serious problems
of environmental contamination even when they are only present in small
quantities.

                            3.  OTHER HAZARDS

     The polychlorocyclodienes are relatively chemically stable compounds.
However, a small amount of hydrogen chloride is given off when chlordane
is acted on by water, and this must be taken into consideration when it is
stored in a metal container.  Moist chlordane strongly corrodes metals, and
small amounts of epichlorohydrin are often added to chlordane for the purpose
                                                     1 fil R
of tying up the hydrogen chloride evolved in storage.

     The fire hazards associated with the polychlorocylodiene insecticides
usually depend only on the solvents employed in their formulation.  When
heated to decomposition, however, they emit highly toxic fumes of hydro-
gen chloride and other chlorinated products.

                4.  DEFINITION OF ADEQUATE WASTE MANAGEMENT
                      Handling, Storage, and Transportation

     Since all the polychclorocyclodiene insecticides are toxic to man by
inhalations ingestion.or skin contact, great care must be exercised in
their handling.  The use of rubber gloves, goggles, a respirator, and full
protective clothing is recommended in the handling and application of these
insecticides, and any material spilled on the skin should be immediately
removed with plenty of water and soap.  If clothing has been contaminated,
it should be removed as soon as possible and the skin washed as above.

-------
     The polychlorocyclodiene insecticides should be stored in cool, dry,
well-ventilated places, and away from any area where the fire hazard may
be acute.  Outside or detached storage is preferred.  Proper warning signs
should be posted in storage areas.

     Aldrin, dieldrin, and endrin are classified as Class B poisons by the
Department of Transportation, and the rules and regulations governing their
transporation are given in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 49-
Transportation, Parts 71-90. °278 Chiordane and heptachlor are less toxic
and not classified by the Department of Transportation and no specific rules
governing their transportation are prescribed.
     The National Agricultural Chemicals Association has established a
Pesticide Safety Team Network with Area Coordinators throughout the country
to provide nationwide 24-hour service .  The network became operational
on March 9, 1970 (with a central telephone number-[513]-916-4300) and
should be consulted in all cases of accidents, spills, leakage, fires,
and other types of disasters involving the polychlorocyclodiene insecticides.

                             Disposal/Reuse

     Contaminated or degraded polychclorocyclodiene insecticides could not
be practically considered for reprocessing.  The safe disposal of the in-
secticides is defined in terms of provisional limits in the atmosphere and
a potable water source/or marine habitat.  The provisional limits are as
follows:
Contaminant                                                     Basis
  in Air                  Provisional Limits             for Recommendation
Aldrin                      0.0025 mg/M3                        0.01 TLV
Chiordane                   0.005 mg/M3
Dieldrin                    0.0025 mg/M3                           .,
Endrin                      0.001 mg/M3
Heptachlor                  0.005 mg/M3
                                     11

-------
Contaminant in
Water and Soil          Provisional Limits     Basis for Recommendation
Aldrin                  0.012 ppm  (mg/1)       Stokinger and Woodward Method
Chlordane               0.025 ppm  (mg/1)       Stokinger and Woodward Method
Dieldrin                0.012 ppm  (mg/1)       Stokinger and Woodward Method
Endrin                  0.005 ppm  (mg/1)       Stokinger and Woodward Method
Heptachlor              0.025 ppm  (mg/1)       Stokinger and Woodward Method

     The point source strategy of  monitoring waste effluents is suggested
as the best current solution of minimizing water pollution by the poly-
                              l fil ?
chlorocyclodiene  insecticides.      Analysis of a combination of stream
water, mud, and aquatic life is considered as inadequate because of the
persistence of these compounds, which makes it difficult to relate the
presence of the pesticides to the  time and place of their introduction.

               5.  EVALUATION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES

                        Dilute Pesticide Wastes

     Option No.1  - Adsorption with Powdered Activated Carbon.*  The
effectiveness of  powdered activated carbon on the removal of polychloro-
                                                                     0441
cyclodiene insecticides from water has been reported by Robeck et al,
Sigworth,     and Whitehouse.      Robeck et al investigated initial
dieldrin and endrin concentrations in the 0.5 to 10 ppb range and found
that final reduction of the pesticide level to 0.25 ppb could be accomplished
with powdered activated carbon dosages of 30 to 60 ppm.  Sigworth's studies
were conducted with initial chlordane concentrations of 50 ppm, and he
concluded  that 10 ppm carbon dosages in a treatment plant would accomplish
over 99 percent removal of chlordane and at least 90 percent removal of
most of the pesticides that are extensively used today.  Whitehouse
investigated  the  effects of carbon dosage and contact time on aldrin and
dieldrin removal  from water, with  initial aldrin and dieldrin concentrations
*  The contaminated carbon could be regenerated in a multi-hearth furnace
   under a controlled atmosphere at temperatures in excess of 1600 F,  so
   that the adsorbed impurities are voltalized and selectively oxidized
   from the surface of the carbon.

-------
of  0.0066  ppm  and  0.0040  ppm  respectively,  and showed  that  over 90 percent
removal of pesticides  could be  obtained  after one  hour and  carbon dosage
of  100 ppm in  the  case of aldrin  and  200 ppm in the  case  of dieldrin.   The
necessary  carbon dosage and the associated  degree  of removal  of heptachlor
should be  in the same  range as  those  for chlordane.  Based  on the results
of  these studies,  the  addition  of powdered_actiyated c^rbog to a liquid
                                   1      ~~~    ——_"-—=.    .----••-.  .      i    -^
_so 1 ution foUo we_Oy_s t i>rjjTg_jind_^^
treating dilute polychlorocyclodiene  pesticide wastes.

      Option No.2 - Adsorption with Granual  Activated-Carbon Beds.* The
effectiveness  of granular activated-carbon  beds to remove dieldrin and
                                                        0441
endrin from water  has  been investigated  by  Robeck  et al.       Following
passage through two carbon columns,  it was  found that  initial  dieldrin
concentrations of  4.3  ppb and 0.5 ppb could be reduced to 0.05 ppb and
well  below 0.01 ppb respectively.  Endrin removal  was  also  reported to
be  over 99 percent.  Treatment  of waste  carbon beds  has been practiced
by  Fisons  Pest Control  Ltd.,  in England  since 1955,1035'1631  where 99
percent removal of the pesticides are obtained.  The treated effluent  is
diluted with river water  before discharge to the river, and the results
of  government  biological  surveys  indicated  no effects  of  the discharge
on  the river.  Because of the adequate contact time  provided and the fact
that  it is a well  established chemical engineering unit operation,
adsorption with granular  activated-car.bon beds should  be  considered as
one of the most satisfactory  methods  for treating  dilute  polychlorocyclo-
diene pesticide wastes^

      Option No.3   - Acid Hydrolysis.  Whitehouse  reported  that below  a
pH  value of 3  the  concentration of aldrin and dieldrin in water rapidly
decreased.      Aldrin, dieldrin, and endrin have  also been reported to
                                                          1 fil R
undergo decomposition  in  the  presence of acid by Melnikov.       However,
based on the limited information  available  to date,  .acid  jiydrolysis could
only  be considered as  a POJjSJjalj^^
and endrin.	   _
*   The contaminated carbon could  be  regenerated in a multi-hearth furnace
    under a controlled  atmosphere  at  temperatures in  excess  of 1600 F,  so
    that the absorbed impurities are  voltalized and selectively oxidized
    from the surface of the carbon.

                                  13

-------
                                                      0442
     Option No.4 - Chemical Oxidation.  Buescher et al     examined the
effects of various chemical oxidants on aldrin and dieldrin.   They
concluded that aldrin in saturated aqueous solutions were readily and
completely removed by chlorination, potassium permanganate, and ozonation,
up to 85 percent removed by aeration, and not removed at all  by peroxides.
Among the chemical oxidants tested, potassium permanganate was found to
be the most efficient and a one mg/liter dosage could result in the
complete removal of aldrin in 15 minutes contact time.  In the case of
dieldrin, the pesticide concentration in saturated solutions was decreased
by approximately 80 percent by ozonation and aeration.  In a concurrent
                                                                      t\
                                                                      -0441
and independent study,     Whitehouse also found that aldrin and dieldrin
were removed by aeration to a significant extent.  Robeck et al  in 1965
found that chlorine and potassium permanganate at 1  to 5 ppm did not reduce
dieldrin or endrin, although ozone doses of 10 ppm did reduce 10 ppb
dieldrin in water to 5 ppb.  The more recent study by Leigh in 1969
showed that potassium permanganate in 40 mg/liter dosage was effective in
removing heptachlor over a wide range in pH and a reasonable length of
time, and heptachlor removals of more than 80 percent in less than 5 hr
were observed.  The same study also indicated that chlorine was  much
less effective than potassium permanganate in removing heptachlor,
whereas endrin was not removed by potassium permanganate, potassium
persulfate, or chlorine.  Based on the results of these studies, it may
be concluded that potassium permanganate^addition Jp_j^te_wjter^ij^as
effecti ve mejUTSj)f^emp^^
be used for removing aldrin,.

     Option No.5 - Anaerobic Degradation.  The anaerobic degradation of
aldrin, dieldrin, endrin, and heptachlor has been investigated by Hill
            l fi?ft
and McCarty.      They concluded that all the polychlorocyclodiene
insecticides studied experienced some degradation under suitable anaerobic
conditions, and with the exception of dieldrin, the degradation was also
more rapid than under the corresponding aerobic conditions.  Experiments
conducted with thick anaerobic sludge at 95 F and large doses of pesticide
mixtures indicated that 40 ppm aldrin added could be completely degraded
in 56 days, 150 ppm endrin in 30 days, and 10 ppm heptachlor in 20 minutes,
whereas dieldrin showed little or no degradation. Both endrin and heptachlor

-------
formed extractable degradation products, but these pesticides and their
extractable degradation products together were still less persistent than
aldrin under anaerobic conditions.  Based on these experimental results,
                                      residence time shoulbe considered
as an a d e q uate me thgd f o r_lr^ating_^j Jjjt j_ajdxjn , e n ^ijij_jor_j)e gtachj lo r
wastes^

     Option No. 6 - Removal by Surface Active Agents.  The removal of
aldrin and dieldrin from water by the use of surface active agents to
                                                   0445
produce a foam has been investigated by Whitehouse.      The amount of
removal accomplished by foaming with a given dose of surface active agent
                                                      *=._ z« — —  -    --— ^ — ~_-i
was found to be increased as the pHdecreased.  Of the three types of
surface active agents tested, alky! benzene sulfonate (anionic), Dowfax
9M9 (nonionic), and Aerosol C-61 (cationic), the jca-tloj]JJL,when applied in
7 to 14 mg/liter dosages effected greater than 90 percent removal of both
aldrin and dieldrin (when aldrin and dieldrin were initially present in
concentrations of 0.02 ppm and 0.035 ppm respectively).  The results of
these studies demonstrated the value of the process as a near future
treatment method for aldrin, dieldrin, and possibly other types of
pesticides.

     The other treatment processes for the removal of polychlorocyclodiene
insecticides from water that have been investigated i ncl ude jdsorptj o_n _with
clay and coagulation and filtration.  Whitehouse     showed that the removal
of aldrin and dieldrin by adsorption with clay or chemical coagulation was
not totally effective and only of the order of 10 to 50 percent.  Robeck et
  0441                                      "   c======i
al     reported 55 percent removal for dieldrin and 35 percent removal for
endrin by coagulation and filtration when the pesticides were initially
present in 1 to 10 ppm concentrations.  These
pesticide wastes.
               ^                             dilute polychlorocyclodiene
                                  15

-------
                       Concentrated Pesticide Wastes

     Option No.1 - Incineration.  The complete and controlled high
temperature oxidation of polychlorocyclodiene insecticides in air or
oxygen with adequate scrubbing and ash disposal  facilities offers the
greatest immediate potential for the sa f e jjjs Ejosal^rof_pesticjdes.   The
research on incineration of pesticides conducted by Kennedy et al  at
Mississippi State University has led to the conclusion that temperatures
at or near 1,800 F will be sufficient to degrade 99.5 percent of dieldrin
and 99 percent or more of most reagent grade pesticides and commercial
pesticide formulations.           It is expected that either a rotary kiln
or liquid combustor, depending upon the waste form, followed by secondary
combustion and scrubbing would be an acceptable disposal method.  Primary
combustion should be carried out at a minimum of 1,500 F for at least 0.5
seconds with secondary combustion at.a minimum of 2,200 F for at least
1.0 sec.  In the case of dieldrin, the volatile products identified from
burning of the formulation at 1,650 F include carbon monoxide, carbon di-
oxide, chlorine and hydrogen chloride.  The equilibrium product distributions
resulting from the thermal decomposition and combustion of aldrin at atmo-
spheric pressure and three temperatures, 2,190 F (1,200 C), 1,470 F (800 C),
930 F (500 C), have also been computed using the TRW Chemical Analysis
Program (Table 3).  The results also indicate the possible formation of
hydrogen chloride, but that at high air/fuel ratios, complete combustion is
approached and both methane and carbon monoxide are only present in small
quantities.  As the same combustion products will be obtained in the incin-
eration of other polychlorocyclodiene insecticides, an adequate gas clean up
system to remove chlorine and hydrogen chloride must be installed to al-
leviate the air pollution problem.  The abatement problem may be simplified
by ensuring against elemental chlorine formation through injection of steam
or methane into the combustion process.  Incineration is also one of the
principal means of disposing heptachlor and endrin manufacturing wastes at
                                    1 -i of:
Velsicol's Memphis, Tennessee plant.      In addition, combustion units
designed for the disposal of chlorinated organic wastes and capable of
recovering chlorine in the form of usable hydrogen chloride have been de-
veloped, and a 7,000 Ib/hr plant is now under construction for E.  I. du Pont
de Nemours & Company in Victoria, Texas by Union Carbide Corporation.

-------
                                                   TABLE  3
                                EQUILIBRIUM COMPOSITION OF  ALDRIN/AIR  SYSTEM
                                 (1  ATM PRESSURE)  MOLE FRACTION,  GAS PHASE*f
Kt %
Pesticide Temp,
100 1200
800
500
70 1200
800
500
50 1200
800
500
20 1200
800
500
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
CH4
9.222-4
2.256-2
1
2.730-4 1
4.302-3 1
2
2
1.262-3 2
5
5
1 . 260-4 2
CO
-
.573.1
.502-1
.572-2
.396-1
.259-1
.129-2
.878-2
.619-2
.579-2
co2
-
.-
3.220-3
6.191-2
-
7.280-3
1.136-1
1.450-1
1.476-1
1.667-1
H2
1.428-1
1.411-1
1.010-1
' 7.831-2
7.679-2
4.409-2
4.468-2
4.371-2
2.388-2
2.403-3
4.986-3
7.545-3
^


1.
3.

1.
2.
1.
1.
9.
40
-
-
508-3
357-2
-
291-3
463-2
459-2
200-2
426-3
HC1
8.572-1
8.579-1
8.765-1
4.708-1
4.731-1
5.178-1
2.688-1
2.711-1
3.063-1
1.019-1
1.019-1
1.034-1
Condensed
Phase Graphite
HCN N2 Mol/100 G Feed
-
1.978-4 2.933-1
2.948-1
3.226-1
1.844-4 4.467-1
4.506-1
5.090-1
6.773-1
6.773.1
6.871-1
3.
3.
3.
1.
2.
2.
0.
0.
1.


0.
288
286
246
991
003
202
911
937
279
-
-
045
The data format used is an exponential form, i.e., X.XX-Y is equivalent to X.XX  10
Mole fractions less than io~^ are indicated by -.
                                                                                  -Y

-------
Properly designed and operated incineration is therefore considered as the
best present and near future method for the disposal of concentrated poly-
chlorocyclodiene pesticide wastes.

     Option  No. 2  -  Chemical  Degradation.   The use of chemical reagents
to  decompose concentrated  pesticide wastes to less  toxic forms has  been
                                                     I 7QO
investigated by Kennedy  et al  and Sweeny  and  Fischer.      The Mississippi
State work showed that liquid  ammonia and metallic  sodium or lithium  would
completely decompose  dieldrin,  but the  reagents are dangerous to use  and
the toxicity of the degradation products  is not known.  Sweeny and  Fischer
demonstrated that all five polychlorocyclodiene insecticides in this
Profile  Report  could  be  substantially degraded by the  mildly acidic
reduction of zinc powder or zince-copper  couple;  however, the degradation
products have not yet been identified and the soluble  zinc ions formed are
toxic and pose  another environmental problem.  Aldrin,  dieldrin, endrin,
and heptachlor  are  all resistant to the action of caustic alkalies, and
chlordane is only partially degraded under the influence of caustic
         l fil ft
alkalies.       Based  on  the results to  date,  chemical  degradationj:ould
 not_bg  reconOTejidjdj|sjejjEj^                     of  concentrated  poly-
      Option  No. 3  -  Sanitary Landfill.    Soil  burial  of  polychlorocyclodiene
 pesticide  wastes, because of their extended  persistance of  up  to  six years,
 is  not  a satisfactory means of disposal.   In the  case of aldrin and
 heptachlor,  their activity is extended through the  formation of their
 respective metabolites,  dieldrin and heptachlor epoxide.  Both dieldrin
 and heptachlor epoxide are more chemically inert  and persistent than the
 pesticides they derive from, and heptachlor  epoxide is  also more  toxic
                                  1618
 than heptachlor to  all  organisms.       Sani tary 1 andf i 1 1 , should JbJbecaffi£e
 be  only consid^r^dJ^Jkbe^djsjj^] ^.-^I^j^lLjMIBliiJi65  of
                                         are^ acceptable_frpm a  geologic
 and  ground-Mater hydro 1 o

-------
       Option No.4 -  Deep-well.  Although all  the polychlorocyclodiene insecticides
  are  practically  insoluble  in water,  their persistence  and  stability in water
  and  the  potential contamination of ground water make deep-welj__at_best_a
  questionable mejihj^^                                    Deep-well dis-
  posal  of chlordane  manufacturing wastes  is  currently practiced  at  VelsicoTs
                          1735
  Marshall,  Illinois  plant.      The method is  not  recommended  by the National
  Working  Group  on Pesticides,    and  should  be considered only under special
  situations  where hazards would be nonexistent.

C     The disposal of  polychlorocyclodiene pesticide wastes in open pits, ]
 \lagoons, unapproved landfill sites ,  and by on-site burning or  deep sea
  burial are not recommended practices because  of the  obvious  contributions
  to air and water pollution.                                         "*"~"=c
  s=s=»
       To summarize,  the adequate  methods for treating  dilute  polychloro-
  cyclodiene pesticide  wastes are:  (1) adsorption with  powdered activated
  carbon; (2) adsorption with granular activated-carbon beds;   (3) potassim
  permanganate addition for removing  aldrin or heptachlor;  (4)  ozonation
  for removing aldrin;  and (5) anaerobic degradation for removing aldrin,
  endrin, or heptachlor.  The only adequate method for the disposal  of
  concentrated polychlorocyclodiene pesticide wastes is incineration.

                   6.  APPLICABILITY TO NATIONAL DISPOSAL SITES

       The future of the polychlorocyclodiene  insecticide market  is
  relatively  unclear at the present moment.  However, there is sufficient
  quantities  of degraded and surplus material  (due mainly to restrictions
  placed  upon its utilization)  to warrant that these pesticides  be
  considered  as candidate waste stream constituents for national  disposal.
  Treatment facilities used to  dispose of other  types of pesticide  wastes
  at  National Disposal  Sites are generally also  adequate to handle  the
  polychlorocyclodiene insecticides.   For the  treatment of  dilute
  polychlorocyclodiene pesticide wastes,  the recommended processes  are:
                                      19

-------
Process                       Order of Preference                 Remarks

Activated-carbon bed          First Choice               Demonstrated tech-
                                                         nology; recommended
                                                         unit operation at
                                                         National Disposal
                                                         Sites.

Potassium permanganate        Second Choice              Only applicable
addition                                                 for removing aldrin
                                                         and heptachlor.

The only process recommended for treating concentrated polychlorocyclodiene

pesticide wastes at National Disposal Sites is incineration.
             A

     It should be noted that both the activated-carbon bed process and

incineration could also be employed in the treatment of other types of

polychlorocyclodiene pesticide wastes, such as alodan and isodrin wastes.

-------
                             7.   REFERENCES


0062. Kennedy, M.  F.,  B.  J.  Stojanovic, and F.  L. Shuman, Jr.   Chemical  and
        thermal methods for disposal  of pesticides.   Residue Reviews^
        29:89-104, 1969.

0063. Kennedy, M.  F.,  B.  J.  Stojanovic, and F.  L. Shuman, Jr.   Chemical  and
        thermal aspects of pesticide  disposal.   Journal  of Environmental
        Quality. l(1):63-65. Jan. 1972.

0206. Lichtenstein, E. P.  Persistence and degradation of pesticides in  the
        environment.   ^Scientific Aspects of Pest Control.  Publication
        No. 1402.  National Academy of Sciences—National  Research Council,
        1966.  221 p.

0225. American Conference of Governmental Industrial  Hygienists.   Threshold
        limit values  for 1971.  Occupational Hazards,  p. 35-40,  Aug.  1971.

0278. Code of Federal  Regulations,, Department of Transportation.   Title  49,
        Parts 71-90.   Washington, Superintendent of Documents, U. S.
        Government Printing Office, 1967.  794 p.

0441. Robeck, G. G.,  K. A, Dostal, J. M. Cohen, and J. F. Kreissl.   Effec-
        tiveness of water-treatment processes in pesticide removal.
        Journal of American Water Works Association,  57(2):181-189,
        Feb. 1965..

0442. Buescher, C. A., J. H. Dougherty, and R.  T. Shrinde.  Chemical
        oxidation  of  selected organic pesticides.  Journal of the Water
        Pollution  Control Federation, 36(8):1,005-1,014, Aug.  1964.

0445. Whitehouse,  J.  D.  A study of the removal of pesticides  from water.
        Research Report No.  8.  Water Resources Institute, University of
        Kentucky,  Lexington, Kentucky, 1967.  175 p.

0448. Working Group on Pesticides.  Ground disposal  of pesticides:   the
        problem and criteria for guidelines.  PB 197144.   Washington,
        U. S. Government Printing Office, 1970.  62 p.

0449. Finkelstein. H.   Preliminary air pollution survey of pesticides; a
        literature review.  Report No. NAPCA-APTD-69-44, PB 188-091.  Silver
        Springs, Maryland, Litton Systems, Inc., Oct. 1969.   169  p.

0509. Metcalf, R.  L.   The chemistry and biology of pesticides. Jn_
        Pesticides in  the environment,  v. 1.  Part 1.  Ed.  by R. White-
        Stevens.  New  York, Marcel Dekker, Inc., 1971.  p. 1-144.

0536. Water quality criteria.  Report of the National Technical Advisory
        Committee  to  the Secretary of the Interior.   Washington,  Federal
        Water Pollutiorr Control  Administration, Apr.  1, 1968.   234 p.

-------
                          REFERENCES (CONTINUED)


0619. Working Group on Pesticides.  Proceedings;  National  Working Conference
        on Pesticide Disposal, Beltsville, Maryland, June  30 and July  1,
        1970.  Washington, U. S. Government Printing Office, 1970.   141 p.

0620. Working Group on Pesticides.  Information available  on disposal  of
        surplus pesticides, empty containers and  emergency situations.
        Washington, U. S. Government Printing Office, 1970.   52 p.

0621. Working Group on Pesticides.  Summary of interim guidelines for
        disposal of surplus or waste pesticides and pesticide containers.
        Washington, U. S. Government Printing Office, 1970.   25 p.

0766. Sax, N. I.  Dangerous properties of industrial materials.  3d ed.
        New York, Reinhold Publishing Company, 1968.  1,251  p.

1035. Lambden, A. E., and D. H. Sharp.  Treatment of effluents  from the
        manufacture of weedkillers and pesticides.  Manufacturing Chemist,
        31:198-201, May 1970.

1277. Bailey, J. B., and J. E. Swift.  Pesticide  information and safety
        manual.  Berkeley, California, University of California, Agricultural
        Extension Service, 1968.  147 p.

1433. Kirk-Othmer encyclopedia of chemical technology.  2d ed.   22 v.  and
        suppl.  New York, Interscience Publishers, 1963-1971.

1492. Merck and Company, Inc.  The Merck index of chemicals  and drugs.
        Rahway, New Jersey, 1960.  1,634 p.

1610. Pesticides:  present and future.  Chemical  Engineering, 76(8):133-140,
        Apr. 7, 1969.

1612. Nicholson, H. P.  Pesticide pollution control.  Science,  158:871-876,
        Nov. 11, 1967.

1616. National Agricultural Chemicals Association.  Safety manual for  handling
        and warehousing Class B poison pesticides.  Washington, 1969.   13  p.

1617. Metcalf, R. L.  Organic insecticides-their chemistry and mode of
        action.  New York, Interscience Publishers, Inc.,  1955,  392 p.

1618. Melnikov, W. N.  Chemistry of the pesticides.  New York,  Springer-
        Verlag, 1971.  480 p.

1628. Hill, D. W.,  and P. L. McCarty.  Anaerobic degradation of selected
        chlorinated hydrocarbon pesticides.  Journal of the Water Pollution
        Control Federation, 39(8):1,259-1.277, Aug. 1967.

-------
                          REFERENCES  (CONTINUED)


1629.  Leigh, G.  M.   Degradation of selected chlorinated  hydrocarbon  in-
        secticides.   Journal  of the Water Pollution  Control  Federation,
        41(11):R450-R460,  Nov.  1969.

1631.  Sharp. D.  H.   The disposal  of waste materials  in the pesticide in-
        dustry.   !TI Disposal  of industrial  waste  materials:   papers  to be
        read at the  Conference  at Sheffield University.   17th-19th April,
        1956.   London, England, Society of Chemical  Industry,  1956.   p. 9-15.

1635.  Sigworth,  E. A.   Identification and removal  of herbicides  and  pesti-
        cides.   Journal of American Hater Works Association,  57(8):1,016-
        1,022,  Aug.  1965.

1718.  United States  Tariff Commission.  Synthetic  organic chemicals,  United
        States  production  and sales,  1970.   TC Publication 479.  Washington,
        U.  S.  Government Printing Office, 1972.   262 p.

1734.  Personal  communication.  W.  J.  Anthony,  Velsicol Chemical  Company, to
        C.  C.  Shih,  TRW Systems,  May  18, 1972.

1735.  Personal  communication.  L.  Nelson, Velsicol Chemical  Company,  to
        C.  C.  Shih,  TRW Systems,  May  18, 1972.

1736.  Personal  communication.  K.  Schulz, Velsicol Chemical  Company,  to
        C.  C.  Shih,  TRW Systems,  May  18, 1972.

1737.  Personal  communication.  B.  Kitchens, Shell  Chemical Company,  to
        C.  C.  Shih,  TRW Systems,  May  19, 1972.

1743.  Halswitt,  C.,  and J.  A. Mraz.  HC1 removed  from chlorinated organic
        waste.   Chemical Engineering. 79(11):80-81,  May  15,  1972.

1782.  Sweeny,  K. H., and J. R.  Fischer.  Investigation of means  of controlled
        self-destruction of pesticides.  Environmental Protection Agency,
        Water Quality Office, Water Pollution  Control Research Series 16040
        ELO.  Washington,  U.  S. Government Printing  Office,  June 1970. 128 p.
                                  23

-------
                                  HAZARDOUS WASTES PROPERTIES
                                          WORKSHEET
H.M.
H. M. Name  Aldrin (13)
         1,2,3,4,10,10-hexachloro-
IUC Name 1,4,4a,5,8,8a-hexahydro-1,4-endoexo-
               5,8 dimethanonaphthalene
Common Names
                                                               Structural Formula

                                                                      Ji,
Molecular Wt.
Density (Condensed)
                 364.92
Melting Pt.    104 C
                                                         (1)
Boiling Pt.
                                G>
        Density (gas)
Vapor Pressure (recommended 55 C and 20 C)
 6X10"6 mm
                  25 C
                      (2)
Flash Point
               _         Autoignition Temp.

Flammability Limits in Air (wt %)    Lower _
Explosive Limits in Air (wt. %}
                                     Lower
                        Upper_

                        Upper_
Solubility

    Cold Water 20 X 10
                         mg/liter
  Hot Water
  Ethanol_5_g/10Qml
                                                   (1
    Others: Highly soluble in acetone, amyl acetate, benzene,  dipentene.  dichloroethane,
                     xylene, toluene, and carbon tetrachloride.  0),  (2)
Acid, Base Properties	
Highly Reactive with_
Compatible with  Alkalies and water at room temperature.'  '
Shipped in     1  and 5 gallon cans. 45 gallon drums
ICC Classification  Poison B
                                                 Coast Guard Classification  Poison B
 Comments  The technical  product is a brown mass containing 82% of aldrin,  1?-13*  analogs  and
about 5% various other compounds.	
References  (1)  1617

            (2)  1618

            (3)  0442

-------
H.M.
H. M. Name Chlorodane (484)
2,3,4,5,6,7,8,8-octachl
IUC Name endomethylene-2,3,3a,4,

HAZARDOUS WASTES PROPERTIES
WORKSHEET
oro-4,7- Structural Formula
7,7a-hexahydroindene Cl H
ri ^PSJI 1
^ iii i i i o i
Common Names Hexachlorodicyclopentadiene HClCCll 1
Chloroindan
Molecular Wt. 409.75
Density (Condensed) 1.61 (
Vapor Pressure (recommended 55 C
1 X10"5 mm (3 25 C
Flash Point
clNix"sjtrx^"H
Melting Pt. 104-108 C^ Boiling Pt.
a 25 C ^ Density (gas) &
and 20 0
2 mm @ 175 C fTech. product^ @
Autoignition Temp.
Flairanability Limits in Air (wt %) Lower Upper
Explosive Limits in Air (wt. %)
Solubility
; Cold Water practically insoli
Lower Upper
ible^Hot Water Ethanol
Others: highly soluble in aromatic hydrocarbons and their haloaen derivatives, kPtnnps
esters, kerosene, ethers (l;,(Z)
•. Acid, Base Properties A <:mflll amo'int of HC1 is giupn nff ^n chlordane is actpd on hy
water and moist chlordane strongly corrodes metals. (2)
• Highly Reactive with

Compatible with

Shipped in 1- and 5-gallon cans,
ICC Classification
• Comments Technical chlordane is
but the product when rpfinpd is a
^emulsions or solutions in oraanic
»
45 gallon drums
Coast Guard Classification
a dark brown visrnus liquid with cedar-like odor
palp yellow liquid. It is employed in thp fnmm nf
solvents of pptroleum oritfin.(2)

: References (1) 1617
(2) 1618
25

-------
                                  HAZARDOUS WASTES PROPERTIES
                                          WORKSHEET
H. H. Nante Dleldrin (149)
        1,2,3,4,10,10-hexachloro-t,7,-epoxy-l ,4,
IUC Nana4a,5.6,7,8,83-00tahydro-1.4-exo-S.8-
        dimethanonaphthalene
Common Names
                                                               Structural  Formula
                                                                 "CT
Molecular Wt.
Density (Condensed)
                  382.93
Melting Pt.  175-176 C

  	Density (gas)_
                                                           (2)
Boiling Pt._
   G>
Vapor Pressure (recommended 55 C and 20 C)

1.8 X10"7 mm  
-------
                                  HAZARDOUS WASTES PROPERTIES
                                          WORKSHEET
H. M. Name  Endrin(170)
          1,2,3,4,10,10-hexachloro-6,7-epoxy-
IUC Name  1.4.4a.5.6.7.8.8a-octahvdro-.4-endQ.endo-
          5,8-dimethanonaphthalene
Common Names
                                                               Structural Formula
                                                                  •Cl
Molecular Wt.    382.93
Density (Condensed)	G
Vapor Pressure (recommended 55 C and 20 C)
              P 25 C
                                     Melting Pt.   200 C (decomp.)2^Boiling Pt.
                                             Density (gas)	@	
2X10~7mm
Flash Point	Autoignition
Flammability Limits in Air (wt %)    Lower	
Explosive Limits in Air (wt.  %)      Lower	
                                                             Upper_
                                                             Upper
Solubility
    Cold Water 0.19 ppm
                        (3)
                                       Hot Water
                                                                      Ethanol
    Others:    Highly soluble in most organic solvents.
Acid, Base Properties	
Highly Reactive with
Compatible with_
Shipped in  25 gallon fiber drums (dry powder), 1-and 5-gallon cans, 45 gallon drums (solution
ICC Classification   Poison B                    Coast Guard Classification
Comments  The technical grade product is brown and contains not less than 85% of the
principal compound		
References (1) 1617
           (2) 1618
           (3) 0441
                                            27

-------
                                   HAZARDOUS WASTES PROPERTIES
                                           WORKSHEET


 H. M. Name Heptachlor  (.496)
            1,4,5,6,7,8,8-heptachloro-3a,4,.7,7a-                 Structural  Formula
 IUC Name   tetrahyd ro-4.7-methanoi ndene

 Common Names
 Molecular Wt.   372-28 _    MeTting Pt.    95'96 c         Boiling Pt.
 Density (Condensed)             & __ Density (gas) _ & _
[; Vapor Pressure  (recommended 55 C and 20 C)

I 3XTO"4 mm     0    25 C^
 Flash Point _         Autoignition Temp. _

 Flammability Limits in Air  (wt %)    LoWer _ = _    Upper
 Explosive Limits in Air  (wt. %)      Lower _ ,_    Upper
 Solubility
                                                                                     (2)
     Cold Water practically insoluble   Hot Water	   Ethanol   4.!
     Others: highly soluble in aromatic hydrocarbons, halogenated hydrocarbons,kerosene, acetone
             carbon tetrachloride.  (1),(2)
 Acid, Base Properties	.	
 Highly Reactive with_
 Compatible with  water and resistant to the action of caustic alkalies.
 Shipped in   25 gallon fiber drums (dry powder). l-and5-gal1on cans and
              45 gallon drums (solutions)
 ICC Classification _  Coast Guard Classification ___

 Comment-;   The Pure compound is white crystalline material.  The technical grade product is
  a waxy mass that contains 65-72% heptachlor and 28-:-35% relat.Pri compounds,
 References  (1)

             (2)    1618

-------
                           PROFILE REPORTS ON
               HIGHLY CHLORINATED HYDROCARBON PESTICIDES
           Benzene Hexachloride (55), ODD (136), DDT (137)

                               1.   GENERAL

                                Introduction

     Both DDT and benzene hexachloride (BHC) were first synthesized in the
last century but it was not until  much later, around 1940,  that their in-
secticidal properties were discovered.      DDT has had unprecedented
development as a synthetic insecticide since then because of its unusual
combination of properties of broad spectrum insecticidal action, ease of
                                                      *
manufacture, prolonged stability and residual activity , and relatively
low mammalian toxicity.  It was one of the first pesticides manufactured
on a large scale and easily holds  the record for total volume of any organic
pesticide ever  produced.  Benzene hexachloride is known to have eight ster-
eoisomers, but only one, the Y-isomer, is an active insecticide.  The y-
isomer is also known as 1 indane and mixtures that contain 99 percent of the
y-isomer are known as 1 indane.  The technical grade BHC product containing
10 to 50 percent Y-isomer is seldom used now. ODD (TDE) is one of the meta-
bolites of DDT.  It is somewhat less effective against most insects, but
has the advantage of lower acute toxicity to warm-blooded animals and fish.

     Although the growth of chlorinated hydrocarbon insecticides has been
phenomenal in the past, in recent  years they have not fared well because of
the competition from new products  which are better, cheaper, less toxic,
and more readily degradable, and the trend is towards a decreasing share
of the total pesticide market.  The U.S.  production figures for DDT, BHC,
and 1 indane from the year 1960 to  1967
  This is not necessarily considered as a desirable effect any more.

-------
                       Annual  Production (Thousand Ib)

             1960    1961    1962    1963    1964    1965    1966    1967
DDT        164,180  171,438167,032178,913140,783140,783141,349  103,411
BHC         37,444   25,080  12,022   6,778   6,000  	     6,000
Llndane      6,900    7S700   3=400   1,800   	   -—      	—

     The production figures for BHC include those of its y-isomer lindane.
Individual production figures for ODD are not available, but based on the
quantities used on crops?449 it is estimated that 12,400,000 Ib of ODD were
manufactured in 1964.  These production figures illustrate the decline of
both BHC and DDT-BHC has been gradually displaced by the dieldrin-heptachlor
class of compounds that  are more specific and effective, while the production
of DDT has been fluctuating and is now well below its peak of the early 1960's.
In 1970 only 59,316,000 Ib of DDT were produced.1718
                              Manufacture

     Benzene Hexachloride.  BHC is normally made by the photochemical
                                                                       l fil ft
chlorination with ultraviolet light irradiation of the reaction medium.
The chlorination is typically carried out in a reaction vessel fitted with
a mercury lamp, at atmospheric pressure and a temperature of 20 to 60 C.
The crude product after  initial purification contains up to 24 percent y-
isomer, and lindane is obtained following further fractional crystallization.
Today the only BHC producer in the United States is Hooker Chemical
Corporation, Niagara Falls, New York.0449'1690'1691
      DDT.   The principal method of producing DDT is the condensation of
 chlorobenzene  with chloral  in  the  presence of a  dehydrating agent  such
                              1 /-"] o
 as concentrated sulfuric acid     :
                 2  C1C,HC  +  C  CKCHO	^{C1C,H.)_  CHCC1-, +
                      D  b        O            D *f  i       -3
                         <*    /                  ^

                    V  0' ;        30
                            o

-------
There is, however, considerable variation in process equipment,  design,
reactant concentrations, and methods of purification in DDT manufacture.
The only remaining U.S. producer of DDT is Montrose Chemical Company  in
                     1522
Torrance, California.
     ODD. ODD is produced by the condensation of chlorobenzene with dichloro-
acetaldehyde, which must be quite pure and not contain chloral  as  an
impurity    :
                         CHC12CHO	"(CICgH^ CHCHCL2

                                             C--\L\^
                                       \-  -  /
Both Rohm and Haas and Allied Chemical have discontinued their ODD manufact-
uring operations.  ODD is not currently produced in the United States.

                                   Uses
     BHC was used extensively in the control  of grasshoppers,  cotton  in-
sects, wireworms and other soil  pests but its application is now in the
process of being almost phased out completely.   However, the pesticide
containing 99 to 100 percent of the y-isomer of BHC, known as  lindane,  is
still utilized in combined formulations with other disinfectants for  seed
treatments and with DDT to control the Colorado potato beetle  and other
pests.

     DDT has been employed for the control  of hundreds of species of  in-
sect pests of orchard, garden, field, and forest, as a mosquito larvicide,
as a residual spray in dwellings for malaria eradication, and  as a dust
                                                                1433
applied to humans in mass delousing programs for typhus control.      ODD,
although usually a less effective insecticide than DDT, is superior for
the control of such insects as mosquito larvae, tomato hornworms, and the
red-banded leaf roller.
                                   31

-------
                     Sources and Types of Pesticide Wastes
     The sources of pesticide wastes may include the following
(1) Pesticide manufacturers; (2) pesticide formulators; (3) pesticide
wholesalers; (4) professional applicators; (5) cooperage facilities that
recondition drums; (6) agricultural users; (7) government facilities that
store, transport, and use pesticides; (8) urban and suburban home and
garden users; (9) commercial and industrial processes including those from
rug and fabric treatment facilities manufacturing plants, hospitals, etc.

     In general, pesticide wastes can be classified as either diluted or
concentrated wastes.  Diluted pesticide wastes include those generated
in the waste waters of the manufacturers, formulators, agricultural runoffs,
and possibly spent caustic solutions used to clean empty pesticide containers,
Concentrated pesticide wastes include any unused or contaminated pesticides,
pesticide materials left in containers after emptying, sludges formed in
treating waste water containing pesticides, sawdust or straw used to soak
up accidental pesticide spills.
      Chlorinated  hydrocarbon  pesticides  appear  as waste  stream  constituents
 in  varied forms and  compositions.   Typical  waste streams  containing DDT
 are as  follows:
      30 percent DDT;  10  percent  trichloroethane and  benzylchlorophenol;
      60 percent mixed hydrocarbons
      10 percent DDT;  11  to  18 percent  DDT decomposition  products;
      5  percent benzensulfonic acid;  30 percent  aqueous sulfuric acid
      DDT (unknown amount);  aqueous  waste containing  Na2S04
 More detailed information relating  t&  the forms and  quantities  of waste
 chlorinated  hydrocarbon  pesticides  is  presented in the Volume titled
 Waste Forms  and Quantities,
                                    32

-------
                      Physical  and Chemical  Properties
     The physical  and chemical  properties of lindane,  ODD,  and  DDT are
included in the attached worksheets.   The compound DDT can  exist in 27
isomeric forms, depending on the position of the substituted chlorine form.
The physical and chemical properties  given in the attached  worksheet are
for that of the p,p'-isomer, 2,2-bis(p-chlorophenyl)-l,1,  1-trichlorobenzene
which makes up about 70 percent of the technical grade of DDT,  and is  the
most active insecticidal principal.  The technical grade DDT has a much
lower melting point of around 90 C and is composed of at least  thirteen
identifiable compounds (Table 1).
                                 33

-------
                            TABLET0445
        APPROXIMATE COMPOSITION OF TECHNICAL DDT04if5

                                                        Approximate
        	   Compound	     Percentage

l,l,l-Trichloro-2,2-bis(p-chlorophenyl) ethane (p,p'-DDT)    63-77

1,1, l-Trichloro-2-(o-chlorophenyl-2-(p-chlorophenyl) ethane
    (o,p'-DDT)                                             8~21

l,l-Dichloro-2,2-bis(p-chlorophenyl) ethane (p,p'-TDE)        0.3-4.0

1, l-Dichloro-2-(o-chlorophenyl)-2-(p-chlorophenyl) ethane
    CO,P'-TDE)                                             °-04

l-o-Chlorophenylethyl-2-trichloro-p-chlorobenzene sulfonate  0.1-1.9

2-Trichloro- 1-p-chlorophenylethanol                         0 . 2

Bis(p-chlorophenyl) sulfone                                  0.03-0.6

o-Chloro-crp-chlorophenylacetamide                         0.01

o-Chloro-a-o-chlorophenylacetamide                         0.01

Chlorobenzene                                              0.3

p-Dichlorobenzene                                          0.1

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloro-2-(p-chlorophenyl) ethane               present

Sodium p-chlorobenzenesulfonate                            0.02

Ammonium p-chlorobenzenesulfonate                         0.01

Inorganic                                                   0.01-0.1

Unidentified arid losses                                     5.1-10.6
                              34

-------
                             2.   TOXICOLOGY

     The insecticidal activity of DDT is related to the ease with which
it is absorbed by the insect but despite years of intensive research,
the critical biochemical lesion  is unknown.  DDT affects peripheral  sensory
organs to produce violent trains of afferent impulses that produce hyper-
activity and then convulsion of the insect.  The paralysis and death  that
ensue are thought to occur from metabolic exhaustion or from elaboration
of a naturally occuring neurotoxin.  The exact modes of action of both
ODD and lindane on insects are not known, but it has been suggested that
like DDT they may interact with  the pores of the lipoprotein structure
       V
of the insect nerve, causing distortion and consequent excitation of
          ,          .   .   0509
nerve impulse transmission.

     DDTs ODD, and lindane are all of only moderate toxicity to higher
animals.  DDT and ODD are readily absorbed from the intestinal tract,
and may be taken into the lung and readily absorbed when occuring in the
air in the form of an aerosol or dust.  DDT, ODD, or lindane in solution
may also be absorbed through the skin.

     Acute poisoning of DDT may result in tremors of the head and neck
muscles, tonic and clonic convulsions, cardiac or respiratory failure,
and death.  The estimated oral fatal  dose is 500 mg/kg body weight of the
solid material, with death occuring in 2 to 24 hours.  Effects of chronic
poisoning may include hepatic damage, central nervous system degradation,
                                                                    1492
agranulocytosis, dermatitis, weakness, convulsions, coma, and death.

     ODD is less toxic to humans than DDT.  Acute poisoning of ODD produces
lethargy but no convulsions.  The estimated fatal oral dose is 5g/kg body
weight.  Chronic poisoning leads to atrophy of the adrenal cortex and liver
damage.1492

     Acute poisoning of lindane may be indicated by dizziness, headache,
nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, tremors,  weakness, convulsions, dyspnea,
cyanosis, and circultory collapse.  The estimated oral fatal dose is

                                      35

-------
150 mg/kg body weight.  Topical use may cause local  sensitivity reactions,
and vapors may irritate the eyes, nose, and throat.   Some evidence suggests
that chronic toxicity may cause hepatic damage.

     The .acute oral and dermal LD5Q values of DDT, ODD, and lindane to rats
have all been well established (Table 2).  The acute oral ID™ value of DDT
and lindane is of the order of 100 mg/kg body weight, but for that of the
                                                1277
less toxic ODD is around 3400 mg/kg body weight.      The American Con-              , />
ference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists 1971 recommended Threshold   P     f}^>^
                                            3           0225               Pr01*1
Limit Values (TLV) for the compounds in mg/M  of air are    : DDT, 1.0;    J
lindane, 0.5.  No TLV for ODD is given, but because of its lower toxicity
to humans, it is felt that the established TLV for DDT would also serve
as an adequate criterion for DUD.

     The 48-hour Median Tolerance Limits (TL ^ for DDT, ODD, and lindane
for various types of fresh water organisms have been established by the
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration  (Table 3).  These data
are indicative of the water pollution hazards associated with the use
of the three insecticides.

     Of special concern recently are the stability and lipoid solubility
of the highly chlorinated hydrocarbon insecticides, wh'ich cause them to
accumulate in animal tissues and to be magnified in concentration through
food chains.  Although the presence of DDT, ODD, or lindane in animal,
bird, or fish tissues has not been proven to produce any direct toxic
effects, the residues do interfere with calcium deposition in eggs,
thus causing thin-shelled eggs to be laid and leading to a loss in
                  0449
bird reproduction.      Furthermore, it has been suggested that following
changes in feeding conditions, fish may draw on their fat reserves which
in turn may release into their metabolism concentrations of DDT, ODD,
or lindane that may then prove to be lethal.

-------
                    TABLE 2.
    ACUTE ORAL AND DERMAL LDcn VALUES OF HIGHLY
                            50                     ,_77

CHLORINATED HYDROCARBON INSECTICIDES FOR WHITE RATS!^7/
Insecticides

DDT
ODD
Lindane
Oral LD5Q (mg/kg)
Males Females
113 118
(3400)
88 91
Dermal LD™ (mg/kg)
Males
	

1000
Females
2510
(4000-rabbits)
900
                    TABLE 3.
            48-HOUR TLm VALUES FROM  STATIC  BIOASSAY


            (in  micrograms  per liter)
Insec-
ticide
DDT
ODD
Lindane
Stream
Invertebrate TL
Species
P.
P.
P.
Californica
Californica
Californica
19
1100
8
Cladocerans
Species TLm
D.
D.
D.
pulex
pulex
pulex
0.36
3.2
460
Fish Gammarus
Species TL Lacustris
TL
ILm
Bass 2.1
Rainbow t 9
Rainbow t 18
2.1
1.8
88

-------
                            3.   OTHER HAZARDS

     All three insecticides are relatively stable to the action of heat.
When heated to decomposition, however, they emit highly toxic fumes of
chlorine, hydrogen chloride, and possibly phosgene in the case of lindane.

              4.   DEFINITION OF ADEQUATE WASTE MANAGEMENT

                  Handling, Storage, and Transportation
     Care should be exercised in handling DDT, ODD, or lindane because of
their toxicity and the dangers of absorption through the skin.  The use of
rubber gloves, goggles, a respirator, and protective clothing is advisable
in the handling and application of these insecticides, and any spilled on
the skin should be removed as soon as possible with plenty of water and soap.

     DDT, ODD, or lindane should all be stored in well ventilated areas, away
from any foodstuffs, feeds, or any other material intended for consumption
by humans or animals, and preferably in a separate building.   Ample warning
signs should be posted in storage areas.
     No Department of Transportation shipping labels are required for DDT,
     and lindane, as tl
considered as minimum.1
ODD, and lindane, as the hazards in shipping these insecticides are generally
                      0619
     The National Agricultural Chemicals Association has established a
Pesticide Safety Team Network with Area Coordinators throughout the country
to provide nationwide 24-hour service.  The network became operational on
March 9, 1970 (with a central telephone number [513]-916-4300) and should
be consulted in all cases of accidents, spills, leakage, fires, and other
types of disasters involving DDT, ODD or lindane.

                              Disposal/Reuse
     Contaminated or degraded DDT, ODD, or lindane could not be practically
considered for reprocessing.  The safe disposal of these insecticides is
                                     38

-------
defined in terms of provisional limits in the atmosphere and a potable
water source and/or marine habitat.  The provisional limits are as
follows:
Contaminant in           Provisional Limits      Basis for Recommendation
     Air	
     DDT                 0.01 mg/M3                     0.01 TLV
     ODD                 0.01 mg/M3                     0.01 TLV
   Lindane               0.005 mg/M3                    0.01 TLV

Contaminant in           Provisional Limits      Basis for Recommendation
Water and Soil
     DDT                 0.05 ppm (mg/1)         Stokinger and Woodward Method
     ODD                 0.05 ppm (mg/1)         Based on similar compounds
   Lindane               0.025 ppm (mg/1)        Stokinger and Woodward Method

     The point source control strategy of monitoring waste effluents is
suggested as the best current solution of minimizing water pollution by
                      I c~t 
-------
                                   1635               0445
water has been reported by Sigworth     and Whitehouse,    and the removal
of lindane from water by Robeck et al     and Sigworth.      Sigworth's
studies were conducted with initial concentrations of 5 ppm DDT and 25 ppm
lindane, and he concluded that 10 ppm carbon dosages in a treatment plant
would accomplish 90 percent removal of most of the pesticides that are
extensively used today.  Whitehouse investigated the effect of carbon
dosage and contact time on DDT removal from water, with initial DDT
concentration of 0.0044 ppm, and showed that over 90 percent DDT removal
could be obtained after one hour and carbon dosages above 100 ppm. Robeck
et al investigated initial lindane concentrations of 10 ppb and found that
90 percent of the lindane could be removed with powdered activated carbon
dosage of 30 to 70 ppm.  The necessary dosage and the associated degree of
removal of ODD should be in the same range as those for DDT.  From the
results of these studies, it is seen that the addition of powdered
activated_carbon to a liquid solution followed by stirring and filtration
                                                                    , or
     Option No. 2 - Adsorption with Granular Activated-Carbon Beds.*  The
effectiveness of granular activated beds to remove DDT and lindane from
water has been investigated by Robeck et al .       Following passage through
two carbon columns, it was found that initial concentrations 0.1  ppb DDT
and 7.7 ppb lindane in water were reduced to below €.01 ppb.  Treatment of
waste water containing a variety of pesticide wastes with granular activated-
carbon bed has been practiced by Fisons Pest Control Ltd., in England since
1955,    '     where 99 percent removal of the pesticides are obtained.  The
treated effluent is diluted with river water before discharge to the river^
and the results of government biological surveys indicated no effects of
the discharge oh the river.  Because of -the adequate contact time provided
and the fact that it is a well established chemical engineering unit
operation, adsorption with granular activated-carbon beds should be considered
as one of the most satisfactory methods for treating dilute DDT, ODD, or
lindane wastes.
* The contaminated carbon could be regenerated in a multi-hearth furnace
  under a controlled atmosphere at temperatures in excess of 1,600 F, so
  that the adsorbed impurities are voltalized and selectively oxidized
  from the surface of the carbon

-------
     Option No.3-Coagu1ation and Filtration. As early as 1945 Carol lo     showed
that coagulation, sedimentation, and filtration could be used to remove from
80 to 90 percent of the DDT in a water supply originally containing 0.1 to
10 ppm suspended DDT.  The treatment apparently did not remove DDT in sol-
ution or extremely fine suspension, but complete removal (to less than
0.001 ppm) was effected when intimate contact with 1.65 to 15.0 ppm activated
carbon was provided for fifteen minutes after coagulation and sedimentation
and before filtration.  The coagulants used in Carollo's study include alum,
ferric chloride, and ferric sulfate, and the effectiveness of the method
was demonstrated by the zero percent kill of A. aegypti (mosquito larvae)
                                                   0441
in treated water in 48 hours.  In 1964 Robeck et al    reported that 97
percent removal of 10 to 25 ppb DDT could be achieved by the conventional
treatment with coagulation followed by sand filtration, whereas lindane
                                                 0445
was not removed.  The recent study of Whitehouse,    however, indicated
that chemical coagulation alone was not effective in removing organic
pesticides from water.  Chemical  coagulation followed by sand JHJJxation
                                  A^Jdjoil^ltEilliJ^^
adequate method for removing DDT or ODD (which is similar in chemical
structure to DDT) from water, but not for lindane.
     Option No.4-Alkaline Hydrolysis. Lindane has been reported by Metcalf
            i fil ft
and Melnikov     to undergo dehydrochlori nation in an alkaline environment
to produce primarily 1 ,2,4-trichloroethane.  Leigh      observed that more
than 98.5 percent of the lindane was removed at a pH of 11.5 in 6.5 hr.
Metcalf1617 and Melnikov1618 also reported that DDT is dehydrochlorinated
readily in alkaline solution with the formation of an insecticidally in-
ert compound, whereas Leigh     found that complete removal of DDT could
be obtained at a pH of 11.1 in less than 24 hr.  ODD is similarly de-
hydrochlorinated in alkali to form 292~bis-(p-chlorophenyl )-l-chloroethylene,
although at a slower rate than DDT- the hydrolysis rate constants of DDT
and ODD at 20 C being 0.0248 liter/sec/mole and 0.00567 liter/sec/mole
respectively.       From this information, it is apparent that _§lkaJLin£-
hy dro lysis in a propjerJLy^ejijinedjgu.j^                          i den ce .time
is an adequate process forj^ea^ng;=^i;lyle^.DDT,^jDDp, or lindane wastes.
                                  41

-------
     Option No.5-Anaerobic Degradation. The anaerobic degradation of UUT.DDD
                                                      1 fi?R
and lindane has been investigated by Hill and McCarty.       They concluded
that under suitable, biologically active, anaerobic conditions the de-
gradation of DDT, ODD, or lindane was far more rapid than under corresponding
aerobic conditions.  Anaerobic degradation in thick sludge at 95 F lowered
the lindane concentration from 10 ppm to 5 ppm in 1 day, and to 0.5 ppm in
2 days.  Under the same conditions DDT was converted almost immediately to
ODD; the ODD was then degraded gradually but steadily and had a half-life
of less than one week.  Hill and McCarty also observed that the degradation
of lindane and ODD appeared to follow first-order kinetics, and based on
this assumption, the anaerobic degradation rate constants for lindane and
ODD are 0.7/day and 0.1/day respectively at 95 F.  It was also shown that
temperature changes from 67 F to 95  F produced no significant effects on
the degradation rates of DDT and ODD, although lindane degraded much more
rapidly at the higher temperature.
     Option No.6-Remova1 by Surface  Active Agents. The  removal of pesticides from
water by the use of surface active agents to produce a foam has been invest-
igated by Whitehouse.     Although DDT, ODD, or lindane were not included
in the study, the results with aldrin and dieldrin showed that up to 90
percent removal was attainable and demonstrated the value of the process as
a possible near future treatment method for other types of pesticides.

     The other treatment processes for the removal of DDT, DDD, or lindane
from water that have been investigated include adsorption with clay, chemical
                                     0445
oxidation, and aeration.  Whitehouse    showed that the removal of DDT and
BHC by adsorption with clay was not  totally satisfactory and only of the
order of 20 to 25 percent.  Buescher et al   ' examined the effects of various
chemical oxidants on lindane, and concluded that calcium hypochlorite,
hydrogen peroxide, and sodium peroxide had no measurable effect on lindane,
whereas potassium permanganate and ozone could remove only part of the
lindane present.  Robeck et al in 1965    found that chlorine and potassium
permanganate at 1 to 5 ppm did not reduce .DDT or lindane9 and that at re-
latively large and impractical concentrations, ozone did reduce DDT or
lindane somewhat, but the by-products formed and their toxicity were un-
known.  The more recent study by Leigh in 1959     confirmed the earlier

                                       42

-------
findings, and showed that none of the oxidants used—potassium permanganate,
potassium persulfate, or chlorine—were significantly effective in removing
lindane or DDT from water.  The removal of DDT and BHC from water by
                                                            0445
aeration was found to be a significant factor by Whitehouse,     but again
removal was only partial.  These processes are therefore considered as
inadequate methods for treating dilute DDT, ODD, or lindane wastes.

                     Concentrated Pesticide Wastes
     Option No.l - Incineration.  The complete and controlled high
temperature oxidation of DDT, ODD, or lindane in air or oxygen with
adequate scrubbing and ash disposal facilities offers the greatest
immediate potential for the safe disposal of these pesticides.  The
research on incineration of pesticides conducted by Kennedy et al  at
Mississippi State University had led to the conclusion that temperatures
at or near 1,800 F will be sufficient to degrade 100 percent of DDT and
99 percent or more of most reagent-grade pesticides and commercial
pesticide formulations.           It is expected that either a rotary
kiln or liquid combustor, depending upon the form of the waste, followed
by secondary combustion and aqueous caustic scrubbing would be an
acceptable disposal method.  Primary combustion should be carried  out
at a minimum of 1,500 F for at least 0.5 seconds with secondary combustion
at a minimum temperature of 2,200 F for at least 1.0 second.  In the case
of DDT, the volatile products identified from burning of the formulation
at 1,650 F include carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, chlorine and hydrogen
chloride.  The equilibrium product distributions resulting from the
thermal decomposition and combustion of DDT at Atmospheric pressure and
three temperatures, 2,190 F (1,200 C), 1,470 F (800 C), 930 F (500 C),
have also been computed using the TRW Chemical Analysis Program (Table  4).
The results again indicate the possible formation of hydrogen chloride,
but that at higher air/fuel ratios, complete combustion is obtained and
neither methane nor carbon monoxide are found.  As the same combustion
products will be obtained in the incineration of ODD or lindane, an
adequate gas clean up system to remove chlorine and hydrogen chloride
must be installed to alleviate the air pollution problem.  The abatement

-------
                                           .  TABLE 4.
                               EQUILIBRIUM COMPOSITION OF DDT/AIR SYSTEM
wt %
Pesticide Temp. CH«
100 1200
800
500
70 1200
800
>, 500-
b
50 1200
800
500
20 1200
800
500
C 2.331-4
C 3.617-3
C 6.596-2
C 1.000-4
C 1.541-3
C 2.372-2
C
C 6.191-4,
C 8.854-3
C
C -
C . . -
CO
_
-
1.205-1
1.148-1
1.143-2
2.039-1
1.924-1
1.790-2
-
- •
-
co2
_
-
-
1.880-3
3.275-2
-
5.280-3
8.033-2
1.040-1
1.044-1
1.055-1
H2
2.853-1
2.795-1
1.726-1
1.867-1
1.824-1
1.035-1
1.185-1
1.156-1
6.325-2
-
-
-
H20



2.
5.

2.
5.
5.
6.
8.
_
-
-
736-3
733-2
-
907.3
486-2
514-2
129-2
321-2
7
7
7
4
4
5
2
2
3
1
1
7
HC1 HCN
.144-1
.169-1
.614-1
~H,&3^C
.678-1 / 2.673r4
.706-1
.210-1
.969-1 2.771-4
.995-1
.397-1
.236-1
.123-1
.096-2
Condensed
Phase Graphite
N2 Mol/lOOG Feed
_.
-
^
2.
2.
3.
3.
4.
6.
6.
6.


246-1
260-1
502-1 .
802-1
837-1
351-1
656-1
688-1
757-1
1.706
1.696
.\ 1.522
0.840
0.851
1.039
0.119
0.147
0.517
-
-
-
The data format used is an exponential  form, i.e;, X.XX-Y is equivalent to X.XX 10
Mole fractions less than 10   are indicated by - .
                                                                                  -Y

-------
problem may be simplified by insuring against elemental chlorine formation
through injection of steam or methane into the combustion process.
Incineration with scrubbing has also been used successfully in the
disposal of highly chlorinated hydrocarbon wastes from the manufacture
of chlorinated solvents.      Properly designed and operated incineration
is therefore considered as the best present and near future method for
the disposal of concentrated DDT, ODD, or lindane wastes.

     Option No.2 - Chemical Degradation.  The use of chemical  reagents to
decompose concentrated pesticide wastes to less toxic forms has been
investigated by Kennedy et ai°062»0063 and Sweeny and Fischer.1782  The
Mississippi State work showed that liquid ammonia and metallic sodium or
lithium would completely decompose DDT, but the reagents are dangerous to
use and the toxicity of the degradation products are not known.  Sweeny
and Fischer demonstrated that the degradation of DDT can be effected by a
mildly acidic solution of zinc powder or zinc-copper couple.  The principal
degradation product is bis(p-chlorophenyl) ethane, or DDT with all three
aliphatic chlorines removed; however, although this material has been
stated to be void of the neurotoxic effects of DDT, it nevertheless
processes insecticidal properties and thus detoxification of DDT is not
complete.   In the same study, Sweeny and Fischer also found that lindane
could be completely degraded by the mildly acidic reduction of zinc
powder, although the degradation products have not been identified.
Caustic alkalies have been used to decontaminate DDT, ODD, or lindane
containers, but their actions on the concentrated pesticide wastes at
ambient temperatures are relatively slow and involve the evolution of
                          I c~l O
noxious hydrogen chloride.      Based on the results to date and the
effectiveness of incineration by comparison, chemical degradation could
not be recommended as a method for the disposal of concentrated DDT, ODD,
or lindane wastes, especially when large quantities of these pesticide
wastes are involved.

     Option No.3 - Sanitary Landfill. Soil burial of DDT, ODD, or lindane
wastes, because of their extended persistence of up to four years, is not
a satisfactory means of disposal.  The method should only be considered
                                    45

-------
for the disposal of small quantities of pesticide wastes, and only at
approved sanitary landfill sites that are acceptable from a geologic and
ground water hydrology standpoint.

     Option No.4 - Deep well.  Although DDT9 ODD, and lindane are all
only sparingly soluble in water, their persistence and stability in water
and the potential contamination of ground water make deep well at best a
questionable method for the disposal of these pesticides.  Deep well
disposal of pesticide wastes is not recommended by the National Working
Group on Pesticides,    and the method should be considered only under
very special situations where hazards would be nonexistent.

     The disposal of DDT, DDD9 or lindane wastes in open pits, lagoons, un-
approved landfill sites, and by on-site burning or deep-sea burial  are not
recommended practices because of the obvious contributions to air and water
pollution.

     To summarize,  the adequate methods for treating dilute DDT, ODD, or
lindane wastes  are:  (1)  adsorption with powdered activated carbon;  (2) ad-
sorption  with  granular activated-carbon beds,  (3) coagulation  and filtration
for  DDT,  or ODD;  (4)  alkaline hydrolysis; and  (5) anaerobic degradation.
The  only  adequate method for the  disposal of concentrated DDT, ODD,  or lin-
dane wastes is  incineration.

                6.   APPLICABILITY  TO NATIONAL DISPOSAL  SITES

      Although  the  use of DDT,  ODD,  and lindane are  rapidly declining,
 there  are sufficient degraded  and surplus quantities  (due  mainly to
 restrictions placed upon their  application)  in the  DOD and civilian
 sectors to warrant  that  these materials  be  considered  candidate  waste
 stream constituents for  national  disposal.   The treatment  facilities
 used to dispose of  other types  of pesticide wastes  at  National  Disposal
 Sites  are generally also adequate to handle DDT,  ODD,  or lindane wastes.
 For  the treatment of dilute DDT,  ODD,  or  lindane  wastes, the  recommended1
 processes are:

-------
Process
Activated-Carbon
Beds
Alkaline Hydrolysis
Order of Preference
    First Choice
    Second Choice
      Remarks
Demonstrated technology;
recommended unit operation
at National Disposal Sites.
Demonstrated technology;
also applicable to other
types of pesticides that
are readily hydrolzyed in
alkaline medium.
The only process recommended for treating concentrated DDT, ODD, or lindane
wastes at National Disposal Sites is incineration.  Both chemical de-
gradation with strong alkaline solution and sanitary landfill are not con-
sidered suitable for the disposal of large volumes of concentrated pesticide
wastes.

     It should be noted that the activated-carbon bed process could also be
employed in the treatment of other types of dilute pesticide wastes of the
DDT or BHC family.  Alkaline hydrolysis, on the other hand, does not have
the same general applicability.  For example, DDT analogs such as
hexachlorobenzene and methoxychlor both degraded  very slowly in alkaline
medium.  To dispose of other types of  concentrated highly chlorinated
hydrocarbon wastes, incineration is again the only recommended process.
                                       47

-------
                             7.  REFERENCES
0062. Kennedy, M. F., B. J. Stojanovic, and F. L. Shuman, Jr.  Chemical and
        thermal methods for disposal of pesticides.  Residue Reviews,
        29:89-104, 1969.

0063. Kennedy, M. F., B.. J. Stojanovic, and F. L. Shuman, Jr.  Chemical and
        thermal aspects of pesticide disposal.  Journal of Environmental
        Quality, l(1):63-65, Jan. 1972.

0206. Lichtenstein,  E. P.  Persistence and degradation of pesticides in the
        environment.  J_n Scientific Aspects of Pest Control.  Publication
        No. 1402.  National Academy of Sciences—National Research Council,
        1966.  221 p.

0225. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists.  Threshold
        limit values for 1971.  Occupational Hazards,  p. 35-40, Aug. 1971.

0441. Robeck. G. G., K. A. Dostal, J. M. Cohen, and J. F. Kreissl.  Effec-
        tiveness of  water-treatment processes in pesticide removal.
        Journal of American Hater Works Association, 57(2):181-189,
        Feb. 1965.

0442. Buescher, C. A., J. H. Dougherty, and R. T. Shrinde.  Chemical
        oxidation of selected organic pesticides.  Journal of the Water
        Pollution Control Federation, 36(8):1,005-1,014, Aug. 1964.

0445. Whitehouse, J. D.  A study of the removal of pesticides from water.
        Research Report No. 8.  Water Resources Institute, University of
        Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, 1967.  175 p.

0448. Working Group  on Pesticides.  Ground disposal of pesticides:  the
        problem and  criteria for guidelines.  PB 197144.  Washington,
        U. S. Government Printing Office, 1970.  62 p.

0449. Finkelstein. H.  Preliminary air pollution survey of pesticides; a
        literature review.  Report No. NAPCA-APTD-69-44, PB 188-091.  Silver
        Springs, Maryland, Litton Systems, Inc., Oct. 1969.   169 p.

0509. Metcalf, R. L.  The chemistry and biology of pesticides.  Jji
        Pesticides in the environment,  v. 1.  Part 1.  Ed.  by R. White-
        Stevens.  New York, Marcel Dekker, Inc., 1971.  p. 1-144.

0536. Water quality  criteria.  Report of the National Technical Advisory
        Committee to the Secretary of the Interior.  Washington, Federal
        Water Pollution Control Administration, Apr. 1, 1968.  234 p.

0619. Working Group  on Pesticides.  Proceedings; National Working Conference
        on Pesticide Disposal, Beltsville, Maryland, June 30 and July 1,
        1970.  Washington, U. S. Government Printing Office, 1970.  141 p.

-------
                          REFERENCES (CONTINUED)


0620. Working Group on Pesticides.   Information available on  disposal  of
        surplus pesticides, empty containers and  emergency situations.
        Washington, U. S.  Government Printing Office,  1970.   52  p.

0621. Working Group on Pesticides.   Summary of interim guidelines  for
        disposal of surplus or waste pesticides and pesticide containers.
        Washington, U. S.  Government Printing Office,  1970.   25  p.

0766. Sax, N. I.  Dangerous properties of industrial  materials.   3d ed.
        New York, Reinhold Publishing Company, 1968.   1,251 p.

1035. Lambden, A. E., and  D. H. Sharp.  Treatment of effluents  from the
        manufacture of weedkillers  and pesticides.   Manufacturing  Chemist,
        31:198-201, May 1970.

1277. Bailey, J. B., and J. E. Swift.  Pesticide  information  and safety
        manual.  Berkeley, California, University of California, Agricultural
        Extension Service, 1968.   147 p.

1433. Kirk-Othmer encyclopedia of chemical  technology.  2d ed.   22  v.  and
        suppl.  New York,  Interscience Publishers,  1963-1971.

1492. Merck and Company, Inc.  The  Merck index of chemicals and  drugs.
        Rahway, New Jersey, 1960.  1,634 p.

1522. Personal communication.  G. A. Dimichele, Montrose Chemical  Company,
        to C. C. Shih, TRW Systems, Apr. 12, 1972.

1610. Pesticides:  present and future.  Chemical  Engineering, 76(8):133-140,
        Apr.  7, 1969.

1611. Weiss,  C. M.  Organic pesticides and water pollution.   Public Works,
        95(12):84-87, Dec. 1964.

1612. Nicholson, H. P.  Pesticide pollution control.   Science,  158:871-876,
        Nov.  11, 1967.

1617. Metcalf, R. L.  Organic insecticides-their chemistry and  mode of
        action.  New York, Interscience Publishers, Inc., 1955.   392 p.

1618. Melnikovj W. N.  Chemistry of the pesticides.  New York,  Springer-
        Verlag, 1971.  480 p.

1628. Hill, D. W., and P.  L. McCarty.  Anaerobic degradation  of selected
        chlorinated hydrocarbon pesticides.  Journal  of the Water Pollution
        Control Federation, 39(8):1,259-1,277, Aug. 1967.
                                      49

-------
                          REFERENCES (CONTINUED)
                                       \

1629.  Leigh.  G.  M.   Degradation of selected chlorinated hydrocarbon  in-
        secticides.  Journal of the Water Pollution Control  Federation,
        41(11):R450-R460, Nov. 1969.

1631.  Sharp,  D.  H.   The disposal of waste materials in the pesticide in-
        dustry.   J^n Disposal of industrial waste  materials:   papers  to be
        read at the Conference at Sheffield University.  17th-19th April,
        1956.  London, England. Society of Chemical Industry, 1956.   p. 9-15.

1634.  Carollo, J. A.  The removal of DDT from water supplies.  Journal of
        the American Water Works Association, 37(12):1,310-1,317.  Dec. 1945.

1635.  Sigworth, E.  A.  Identification and removal  of herbicides and  pesticides,
        Journal  of American Water Works Association, 57(8):1,016-1,022,
        Aug.  1965.

1690.  Personal communication.  R. Adams, Diamond  Shamrock Corporation, to
        C. C. Shih, TRW Systems, May 9, 1972.

1691.  Personal communication.  R. Goldman, Hooker Chemical Corporation, to
        C. C. Shih, TRW Systems, May 9, 1972.

1695.  Personal communication.  R. Cheves, Rohm and Haas, to C.  C.  Shih,
        TRW Systems, May 9,.1972.

1718.  United States Tariff Commission.  Synthetic organic chemicals, United
        Stated production and sales, 1970.  TC Publication 479. Washington,
        U. S. Government Printing Office, 1972.  262 p.

1782.  Sweeny, K. H., and J. R. Fischer.  Investigation of means of controlled
        self-destruction of pesticides.  Environmental.Protection  Agency,
        Water Quality Office, Water Pollution Control Research Series 16040
        ELO.   Washington, U. S. Government Printing Office, June 1970.   128 p.
                                  50

-------
'' ••'' 	 — - -•••>! . •.. A.-*l-mis-d»» il^.1, .jAjm iMJmJJU-Jt -^UiBB^.tl^.'.'^J JJ>,JLa*.,i.'^. .JittJJjm >mm.... ^ M1«^J«*. --JMUmj. A.. .-u..ia^ J3t.a- .»UI*JUMJ™»..I
HAZARDOUS WASTES PROPERTIES
feSORKSHEET
H. M. Name Lindane (Benzene Hexachloride) («} .- Structural Formula
IUC Name y-1 ,2,3,4,5,6-Hexachlorocyclohexane
Common Names y-isomer of BHC
Molecular Wt. 290.84 Melting Pt. 112-11C
Cl
H/\VH H I
\ J \
H
icO) Boiling Pt.
t*.i. -MRAJ^-
'•
Density (Condensed) 1.85^ *' 9 Density (gas) 0
Vapor Pressure (recommended 55 C and 20C') :
9.4 X 10"6 mm @ 20' C § 0
Flash Point Autoignition Temp.
Fl alienability Limits in Air (wt %) Lower
Explosive Limits in Air (wt. %) Lower
Solubility
Cold Water 0.001 % (1) Hot Water
Upper
Upper
Ethanol
:
Others: soluble in acetone, ethyl acetate, benzene, xylenel'; '
Acid, Base Properties




;
Highly Reactive with

Compatible with actions of heat, light, and stable to oxidation



Shipped in paper bags and fiber drums of various sizes
ICC Classification Coast Guard Classification 1
Comnw>nt5 The cure v-1somer is an almost odorless white
(formulated as solutions, aerosols, wettable powders, and

crystalline material. It is
emulsifiable concentrates.





References (1) 1617, p. 214-215. I
i . ' .
51

-------
H. M. Warns DDD (136)

HAZARDOUS WASTES PROPERTIES
WORKSHEET
Structural Formula
IUC Name 2t2-bis-(p-chloroDhenyl )-l , dichloroethane
Common Names TDE, dichlorodiohenyl dichloroethane \ / i \ y-C'
Molecular Wt. 320.1
Density (Condensed)
Vapor Pressure (recommended 55
Flash Point
Flammability Limits in Air (wt
Explosive Limits in Air (wt. %)
Solubility
Cold Water
\=/ | N 	 /
HCC1?
Melting Pt. 112C^ Boiling Pt.
@ Density (gas) @
C and 20 0
§ 
-------
                                  HAZARDOUS WASTES PROPERTIES
                                          WORKSHEET
H. M. Name DDT  (27 possible isomers)(137)
IUC Name 2,2-bis-(p-chlorophenyl)-l,1-trichloroethane
                                                               Structural Formula
Common Names Dichlorodiphenyl  trichloroethane.ethane
             dicophane,  chlorophenothane
Molecular Wt.  354-5
Density (Condensed)  1.6
                                &
 Melting Pt.   1Q8.5-109C        Boiling Pt._
	Density (gas)	9	
Vapor Pressure (recommended 55 C and 20 C)
                      '*               1 mm
 1.9 X10"7mm
                                                  185
Flash Point
               	         Autoignition Temp.
Flammability Limits in Air (wt %)     Lower	
Explosive Limits in Air (wt.  %)
                                     Lower
                         Upper_
                         Upper_
Solubility
    Cold Water 0.001 mq/l
                         ^
                                       Hot Water
                                  Ethanol
    Others: soluble in ketones, esters of the lower fatty acids, aromatic hydrocarbons, and
            halogen derivatives of hydrocarbons^'>
Acid, Base Properties	
Highly Reactive with
Compatible with  actions of heat.  Pure DDT does not decompose below 195 C, but the technical
material decomposes at about 100 c
                                  12)
Shipped in  fiber drums, bags, tins, and bottles.
ICC Classification
                                                 Coast Guard  Classification
 Comments  Colorless crystals or white to slightly off white nowdpr.   Technical  DDT contains
approximately 70 percent of p.p'-DDT which is thp mn^t pffprtivp insecticide principal.   Tn
application. DDT is formulated as dusts, concentrated emulsions, wettable powders,  preparation
for fine-droplet spraying, and aerosols.	
References (1)  1513
           (2)  1617
                                              53

-------
                               PROFILE REPORT

                                 2,4-D (135)

                                 1.   GENERAL

                                Introduction

      The discovery of the growth regulating properties of the chlorinated
 phenoxyacetic acids  in 1944 and their subsequent employment as herbicides
 began the modern era of selective chemical weed control.  These compounds
 are selective to broad-leaved weeds  in cereals and could be absorbed from
 soil as pre-emergent herbicides.  The growth regulating action is shared
 by a group of hundreds of related molecules all derived from the same
 parent substance, 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid or 2,4-D.  In fact, to
 permit the proper application and formulation of 2,4-D, the amine salts
 and esters of the acid have been generally used instead of 2,4-D as such.

      The chlorophenoxy groups of herbicides which includes 2,4-D, 2,4,5-T
 (2,4,5-trichlorophenoxy acetic acid) and MCPA (2-methyl-4-chlorophenoxy
 acetic acid) comprise approximately  half the total domestic herbicide
 market.  The U. S. production  figures for 2,4-D from  the year 1960  to  1967
 in thousands of pounds are:0449'1610

                   Annual U. S.  Production (thousand Ib)
    1960     1961     1962      1963     1964     1965      1966     1967
§>  361,315   43,392    42,977   46,312   539714   63,320  68,182   77,139

                                                            171ft
 However, in 1970 only 43,576,000 Ib  of 2,4-D were produced.      The pro-
 duction figures thus illustrate the  gradual declining importance of 2,4-D
 as a base material for herbicides.
                                   55

-------
                               Manufacture

     2,4-D is generally prepared by the condensation reaction of monochloro-
acetic acid and 2,4-dichlorophenol in an alkaline solution at atmospheric
pressure, 60 to 80 C, and a residence time of 6 to 8 hr in a jacketed stirred
reactor:1610
                                                 •*• Nad  4-
     Large scale commercial facilities for the manufacture of technical
grade 2,4-D in the United States include the following1774' 1775'  1776s
1777, 1778, 1779, 1780.

     Dow Chemical Company, Midland, Michigan
     Rhodia Inc., Chipman Division, Portland, Oregon
     Transvaal Inc., Jacksonville, Arkansas

The Transvaal  plant was formerly operated by Hercules Inc.

                                   Uses

     The chlorophenoxy acids are active by contact and by translocation
from leaves to roots of perennial weeds and are used as pre-emergent appli-
cations to the soil for control of young seedlings.  They are also effective
for aquatic weed control, for the elimination of unwanted vegetation, and
are selective against many broad-leaved annual weeds in cereal and grass
      0509
crops.

     In addition, 2,4-D and its derivatives have also found important uses
in related fields such as thinning of fruit, prevention of preharvest drop,
fruit setting, promotion of rooting and postharvest decay prevention.

-------
                  Sources  and Types of Pesticide Wastes

     The sources of pesticide wastes may include the  following:      (1)
pesticide manufacturers; (2) pesticide formulators; (3) pesticide whole-
salers; (4) professional applicators;  (5) cooperage facilities that recon-
dition drum; (6) agricultural users; (7)  government facilities that store,
transport,  and use pesticides; (8) urban  and suburban home and garden
users; (9)  commercial  and industrial processes including those from rug
and fabric treatment facilities manufacturing plants, hospitals, etc.

     In general, pesticide wastes can  be  classified as either diluted or
concentrated wastes. Diluted pesticide wastes include  those generated  in
the waste waters of the manufacturers, formulators, agricultural runoffs,
and possibly spent caustic solutions used to clean  empty pesticide con-
tainers.   Concentrated pesticide wastes include any unused or contaminated
pesticides, pesticide materials  left in containers after emptying, sludges
formed in  treating waste water containing pesticides,  sawdust or straw used
to  soak up  accidental pesticide  spills.

     Unlike most pesticides, 2,4-D  is also used as an  aquatic herbicide
and applied directly to lakes, rivers, irrigation waterways, and other
surface waters  for weed control,  thus posing a potential water  pollution
problem.  2,4-D has been reported to persist for several months in lake
waters.1757

      Chlorophenoxy  pesticides  appear  as  waste stream constituents  in varied
 forms  and  compositions.   Typical waste streams  containing chlorophenoxy
 compounds  are as  follows:
      Solvents including toluene  and xylene  containing 1  to 5 percent
      2,4-D and/or 2,4,5-T
      Organic  waste  containing 20 to 25 percent  2,4-D; 20 to 25  percent
      2,6-D; 10 to 15  percent mono-  and trichlorophenoxy acetic  acids
      Still bottoms  containing 2,4-D,  2,6-D  and  chlorophenols.
      Solid wastes  containing 0.5 percent 2,4-D

                                   57

-------
More  detailed  information  relating  to  the  forms  and quantities of waste
chlorophenoxy  compounds  is  presented in  the  volume titled Waste
Forms  and  Quantities.
                        Physical and Chemical Properties
     The physical and chemical properties of 2,4-D are summarized in the
attached worksheet.

                               2.  TOXICOLOGY

     2,4-D is of moderate, acute toxicity to mammals.  The acute oral and
dermal LDrn values to the rat  have been reported to be 375 and 1500 mg/kg
                         1277
body weight respectively.      Inhalation of 2,4-D dusts and sprays is
                                                               0449
relatively harmless, and percutaneous absorption is negligible.

     Chronically 2,4-D is of low toxicity, ?.rid can be ingested b'y animals
and man in daily dosages approaching those which produce acute toxic
effects when given only once.  Thus, the cumulative effects of 2,4-D are
minimal.

     The American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists 1971
                                                                   n f)99£
recommended Threshold Limit Value (TLV) for 2,4-D in air is 10 mg/M .

     The 48-hour Median Tolerance Limit (TL.) for 2,4-D established by the
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration for various types of fresh
water organisms in micrograms per liter are:    P. Californica (stream
invertebrate), 1,800; Daphnia pulex (cladocerans), 3,200; Rainbow trout
(fish), 960; and Gammarus lacustris, 1,800.  These .data are indicative of
the hazards to aquatic life associated with the use of 2,4-D.
                                     58

-------
                           3.   OTHER HAZARDS

     As an organic acid, 2,4-D is corrosive and reacts with  metals  and
bases.  When heated to decomposition, highly toxic fumes of  hydrogen
chloride and other chlorinated products are emitted.

                  4.  DEFINITION OF ADEQUATE WASTE MANAGEMENT
                       Handling, Storage, and Transportation
     Although 2,4-D is only mildly toxic to humans, the use  of rubber
gloves, goggles, and a respirator is recommended in its handling and
application.  Storage of 2,4-D should be in a cool, dry, well-ventilated
area, away from acute fire hazards, and with proper warning  signs posted.
No Department of Transportation shipping labels are required for 2,4-D,
                                                                    0278
as the hazards in shipping 2,4-D are generally considered as minimum.

     The National Agricultural Chemicals Association has established  a
Pesticide Safety Team Network  with Area Coordinators throughout the
country to provide nationwide  24-hour service.  The network  became  opera-
tional on March 9, 1970 (with  a central telephone number - [513] 916-4300)
and should be consulted in all cases of accidents, spills, leakage, fires,
and other types of disasters involving 2,4-D.

                                Disposal/Reuse
     Contaminated or degraded  2,4-D could not be practically considered
for reprocessing.  The safe disposal of 2,4-D is defined in  terms of  the
recommended provisional limits in the  atmosphere and potable water source
and/or marine habitat.  These recommended provisional limits are as follows:
                                                              Basis for
Contaminant in Air            Provisional Limit            Recommendation
      2,4-D                      0.1 mg/M3                    0.01 TLV
   Contaminant in                                             Basis for
   Water and Soil             Provisional Limit            Recommendation
      2,4-D                    0.5  ppm (mg/1)              Stokinger and
                                                           Woodward Method
                                  59

-------
              5.  EVALUATION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES

                         Dilute Pesticide Wastes

     Option No. 1 - Adsorption with Powdered Activated Carbon.*  The effec-
tiveness of powdered activated carbon on the removal of 2*4-0 from water has
been examined by Aly and Faus't,     Sigworth,     and Whitehouse.      Aly
and Faust constructed adsorption isotherms for 2,4-D in accordance with the
Freundlich equation, from which the amount of activated carbon required
to reduce the 2,4-D concentration in water from 10 ppm to 1 ppm and 0.1 ppm
was calculated to be 85 mg/liter and 318 mg/liter respectively.  Sigworth's
studies were conducted with initial 2,4-D concentrations of 1 and 6 ppm;
however, the results obtained were inconclusive because of the possibility
of employing inaccurate analytical procedures.  Whitehouse investigated
the effects of pHs contact time, and carbon dosage on 2,4-D removal from
water, and showed that with an initial 2,4-D concentration of 100 ppm over
90 percent removal of 2,4-D could be achieved at pH values lower than 3.2
after one hour of mixing and a carbon dosage of 300 mg/liter.  With a lower
2,4-D initial concentration of 10 ppm, a pH of 6, and one hour contact
time, 90 percent 2,4-D removal could be obtained with a carbon dosage of
120 mg/liter and 99 percent 2,4-D removal with a carbon dosage of 320 mg/
liter.  Based on the results of the studies of Faust and Aly and Whitehouse,
the addition of powdered activated carbon to a liquid solution (preferably
at a lower pH) followed by stirring and filtration is an adequate method
for treating dilute 2,4-D wastes.

     Option No. 2 - Adsorption with Granular Activated-Carbon Beds.*  Al-
though the effectiveness of granular activated-carbon beds to remove 2,4-D
from water has not been discussed in the literature per se, Robeck et al
     *The contaminated carbon could be regenerated in a multi-hearth furnace
under a controlled  atmosphere at temperatures in excess of 1600 F, so that
the adsorbed impurities are  voltalized and selectively oxidized from the
surface of the carbon.

-------
reported that following passage through the carbon columns, the concentration
of 2,4,5-T (which is simply 2,4-D with an additional aromated chlorine) in
                                           0441
water was reduced from 3.6 ppb to 0.05 ppb.      Treatment of waste water
containing a variety of pesticide wastes with granular activated-carbon
beds have been practiced by Fisons Pest Control Ltd. in England since 1955,
where over 99 percent removal of the pesticides are obtained.    '
The treated effluent is diluted with river water before discharge to the
river, and the results of government biological surveys indicated no
effects of the discharge on the river.  In the United States, both Rhodia
and Dow utilized granular activated-carbon beds in the treatment of their
2,4-D manufacture waste water.     '      Activated-carbon bed adsorption
was also originally employed as the treatment procedure for the waste
water from 2,4-D manufacture at the Naugatuck Chemicals plant, Elmira,
Ontario, Canada,    although the method was later abandoned due to the
high treatment cost associated with the removal of dichlorophenol at that
time (1951).  Because of the adequate contact time provided and the fact
that it is a well established chemical engineering unit operation, adsorp-
tion with granular activated-carbon beds should be considered as one of
the most ^ju.s£a£4cu?y-j!iej^_dj_j^
     Option No. 3 - Biological Degradation.  The biological treatment of
2,4-D waste water has been investigated by Mills1630 and Sidwell.1781  Mills
reported that 2,4-D acid could be oxidized by bacterial action in the
laboratory, but his pilot plant work with trickling filter and activated
sludge systems were mainly concerned with the removal of dichlorophenol
from the 2,4-D manufacture waste water, and no data on the removal of
2,4-D were given.  Si dwell described the Jacksonville, Arkansas project
on joint treatment of municipal waste water and 2,4-D manufacture waste
water from the Transvaal Inc. plant.  Pretreatment of the industrial
effluent included processing through a crushed limestone filled neutrali-
zation ditch and an in-plant equilization pond, and a final pH adjustment
to 7.2 by automatic addition of slaked lime slurry in a continuous stirred
pit.  The combined municipal-industrial waste water containing 2 to 4.2 mg/
liter phenoxy acids was then treated in an aerated lagoon and stabilization
pond system before discharge to the receiving stream.  Although the
removal of chlorophenoxy acids by the lagoon and pond system ranged from

-------
only 49  to  80  percent,  the  stabilization  pond  effluent with  typically  1.1
mg/liter chlorophenoxy  acids  was  considered  to be  good quality,  as sub-
stantiated  by  the  results of  the  biological  surveys  of the upper receiving
stream conducted in  December  1969 and December 1970.  The continuous suc-
cessful  operation  of the  aerated  lagoon  - stabilization  pond system at
Jacksonville,  Arkansas  indicates  that 2,4-D  containing waste water when
combined with  sewage could  be adequately  treated by  biological methods.
                                                                       _—-—^
     Option No. 4  -  Ion Exchange.  The use of  ion  exchange columns to  re-
move the sodium salt of 2,4-D from water has been  examined by Aly and
       1 c oc
Faust.       The results of  their  studies  showed that the sodium  salt of
2,4-D when  present in relatively  high concentrations (120 mg/liter) could
be  completely  removed from  water  by strongly basic anion exchange resins,
and indicated  that neutralization of 2,4-D to  its  sodium salt followed by
passage  through ion-exchange  columns is  an adequate  method for treating
dilute 2,4-D wastes.

     Option No. 5  -  Removal by Surface Active  Agents.  The removal of  pes-
ticides  from water by the use of  surface active agents to produce a foam
                                     0445
has been investigated by Whitehouse.      Although 2,4-D was not included
in  the study,  the  results with aldrin and dieldrin showed that up to 90
percent  removal was  attainable and demonstrated the  value of the process
as  a possible  near future treatment method for other types of pesticides.

     The  other treatment methods  for the  removal of  2,4-D from water that
have been investigated  include  adsorption with  clay, chemical coagulation,
and chemical oxidation.  The  works  of Faust  and Aly,      Schwartz     and
Whitehouse0445 all  suggested  that adsorption  with  clay was  an unsatisfactory
method for  removing  2,4-D from  water.  Faust and Aly    '     examined the
effects  of  chemical  oxidants  on 2,4-D compounds  and concluded that both
chlorine  and potassium  permanganate  were  ineffective in  the  removal  of
2,4-D compounds from water.   The  laboratory  studies  of Faust  and Aly
also showed that chemical coagulation with alum and  ferric sulfate doses
up  to 100 ppm were ineffective  in removing 2,4-D.   These processes are
therefore considered as inadequate  methods for  treating  dilute 2,4-D
wastes.

-------
                      Concentrated Pesticide Wastes

     Option No. 1 - Incineration.   The complete and controlled high temper-
ature oxidation of 2,4-D in air or oxygen with adequate scrubbing and ash
disposal facilities offers the greatest immediate potential for the safe
disposal of pesticides.  The research on incineration of pesticides con-
ducted by Kennedy et al at Mississippi State University has led to the
conclusion that 2,4-D approached complete combustion at temperatures as
low as 1,110 F and identified carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, chlorine
and hydrogen chloride as the volatile products from burning of the 2,4-D
formulation at 1,650 pou06^»0053  jhe equilibrium product distributions
resulting from the thermal decomposition and combustion of 2,4-D at atmos-
pheric pressure and three temperatures, 2J90 F (1,200 C), 1,470 F (800 C),
930 F (500 C) have also been computed using the TRW Chemical Analysis
Program (Table 1).  The results also indicate the possible formation of
hydrogen chloride, but that at higher air/fuel ratios, complete combustion
is approached and both methane and carbon monoxide are only present in
small quantities.  It is expected that either a rotary kiln or liquid
combustor, depending upon the form of the waste, followed by secondary
combustion and aqueous or caustic scrubbing would be an acceptable disposal
method.  Primary combustion should be carried out at a minimum of 1,500 F
for at least 0.5 seconds with secondary combustion at a minimum temperature
of 2,200 F for at least 1.0 second.  The abatement problem may be simplified
by insuring against elemental chlorine formation through injection of steam
or methane into the combustion process.  Incineration is also being con-
sidered by Rhodia, Inc., Portland, Oregon as a possible means of disposing
the solid and semi-solid wastes generated in 2,4-D manufacture.      In
addition, combustion units designed for the disposal of chlorinated organic
wastes and capable of recovering chlorine in the form of usable hydrogen
chloride have been developed, and a 7,000 Ib/hr plant is now under con-
struction for E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Company in Victoria, Texas by
Union Carbide Corporation.      Properly designed and operated incineration
is therefore considered as the best present and near future method for the
disposal of concentrated 2,4-D wastes.
                                 63

-------
                                                TABLE 1.
                              EQUILIBRIUM  COMPOSITION  OF 2,  4-D/AIR SYSTEM

                                (1  AtM PRESSURE) MOLE FRACTION, GAS PHASE*"1"
Wt %
Pesticide
100

70


50


20


Temp.
1200
800
500
1200
800
500
1200
800
500
1200
800
500
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
:C
C
C
C
C
CH4
2.329-4
3.522-3
4.171-2
1 .'002-4
1.520-3
1.832-2
-
6.T67-4
7.594-3
-
-
1 .045-3
CO
4.283-1
3.883-1
2.812-2
4.010-1
3.661-1
2.772-2
3.820-1
.3JS08-1
2.762-2
7.792-2
7.012-2
2.771-2
co2
1.574-4
2.151-2
1.982-1
1.380-4
1.912-2
1.925-1
1.253-4
1,756-2
1.911-1
1.560-1
1.638-1
1.9.24-1
H2
2.852-1
2.758-1
1.373-1
1.870-1
1.81-2-1
9,099-2
1.189-1
1.154-1
5.858-2
8.168-3
1.656-2
2.173-2
H20
2.530-4
1.400-2
1.870-1
1.585-4
8.671-3
1.222-1
1.000-4
5.292-3
7.836-2
4.322-2
3.543-2
2.916-2
KC1
2.859-1
2.967-1
4.077-1
1.875-1
1.930-1
2.499-1
1.192-1
1.220-1
1.522-1
5. 198- 2
5.199-2
5.300-2
HCN

-
2.671-4 2
2
2
2.772-4 3
3
4
6
6
6
Condensed
Phase Graphite
N2 Mol/ 100 G Feed
_
-
.238=1
,304-1
.983-1
.794-1
.883-1
.845-1
.621-1
.621-1
.750-1
2.575
2,667
3.297
1.472
1.558
2.213
0.554
0.633
1.293
-
-
0.056
*The data format used is an exponential form, i;;e. X.XX-Y  is .equivalent to  X.-XX10
 Mole fractions less than 10   are indicated by -.

-------
     Option No. 2 - Chemical Degradation.  The use of chemical reagents to
decompose concentrated pesticide wastes to less toxic forms has also been
investigated by Kennedy et al.     '      The Mississippi State work showed
that liquid ammonia and metallic sodium or lithium would completely decom-
pose 2,4-D, but the reagents are dangerous to use and the toxicity of the
degradation products are not known.  The action of caustic alkalies would
only hydrolyze 2,4-D to the corresponding salts, and no further degradation
could be obtained.  Based on these results and the superiority of inciner-
ation by comparison, chemical degradation could not be recommended as a
method for the disposal of concentrated 2,4-D wastes.

     Option No. 3 - Application to Soil Surface.  Research on the reduction
of 2,4-D waste process liquors into biologically inactive compounds by means
of application to and degradation in the soil surface has been conducted
at Alkali Lake in eastern Oregon under the direction of R. L. Goulding of
                                        IJC.A ly^t;
Oregon State University since late 1969.     '      The results of the
study to date suggested subsurface injection of 2,4-D as a useful, economic
approach to control airborne losses of the waste component, and indicated
clearly the apparent degradation of 294-D by soil microorganisms when
applied at the rate 250 Ib/acre equivalent of 2,4-D.  Data derived from
samples taken from the actual test plots showed that the 2,4-D concentra-
tion in the soil layer subjected to subsurface injection has declined from
an initial 135 ppm to 30 ppm after a 480-day period.  The Oregon State
work in progress thus provides strong support to the adequacy of the
soil surface application as a disposal method for concentrated 2,4-D
wastes.

     Option No.  4 - Deep Well.  Although 2,4-D is only sparingly soluble in
water,  its persistence and stability in water and the potential contamination
of ground water make deep well at best a questionable method for the disposal
of 2,4-D.  Incidents of ground water contamination that persisted for over
3 years leading to the damage of lawns, shrubs and crops, as a result of
the penetration of the 2,4-D waste water through permeable sediments after
                                                         0446
being discharged to rivers or lagoons have been reported.     Deep well

-------
disposal of 2,4-D wastes is currently being practiced at Dow Chemical
                           •I 77D
Company, Midland, Michigan,     but the method is not recommended by the
National Working Group on Pesticides,    and should be considered only
under very special situations where hazards would be nonexistent.

     The disposal of 2,4-D wastes in open pits, lagoons, unapproved land-
fill sites, and by  on site burning or deep sea burial are not recommended
practices because of the obvious contributions to air and water pollution.

     To summarize, the adequate methods for treating dilute 2,4-D wastes
are: (1) adsorption with powdered activated carbon; (2) adsorption with
granular activated-carbon beds; (3) biological degradation; and  (4) ion
exchange.

     The adequate methods for the disposal of concentrated 2,4-U wastes
are (1) incineration, and (2) soil surface application.
                   6.  APPLICABILITY TO NATIONAL DISPOSAL SITES

     It is anticipated that disposal systems to handle both dilute and
concentrated 2,4-D will still be required at National Disposal Sites
located near formulators, users, and especially agriculture centers in
the near future.  The dilute 2,4-L) wastes that will require treatment
include spent cleaning solutions for 2,4-D containers and any other 2,4-D
contaminated waste water.  The concentrated 2,4-D wastes that will require
treatment include any surplus, contaminated, partially or fully degraded
pesticides.

     The processes recommended for the treatment of dilute 2,4-D wastes at
National Disposal Sites are:

-------
Process

Activated-
Carbon Beds
Ion Exchange
Biological
Degradation
  Order of Preference

     First Choice
     Second Choice
     Third Choice
           Remarks

Demonstrated technology on commercial
scale; also adequate for removal of
the sodium salt and esters of 2,4-D
and most other types of pesticides
from waste water.

Demonstrated technology; requires
neutralization to the sodium salt
first and not adequate for the
removal of the 2,4-D esters from
water.

Demonstrated technology on commercial
scale; requires dilution with muni-
cipal sewage before treatment in
aerated lagoons and stabilization
ponds.
     The processes for the treatment of concentrated 2,4-D wastes at

National Disposal Sites are:
Process

Incineration
Soil Surface
Application
Order of Preference

    First Choice
    Second Choice
            Remarks

Demonstrated technology; applicable to
the disposal of organic pesticide wastes;
possibility of recovering chlorine in
the form of usable hydrogen chloride.

Demonstrated technology; also applicable
to the disposal of other types of herbi-
cides that are degradable by soil micro-
organisms.
      It  should be noted that  the activated-carbon bed and biological
degradation  processes could also be employed in the treatment of other
types  of dilute aryloxalkylcarboxylic acid wastes, such as 2,4S5-T and
MCPA  wastes.  To dispose of other types of concentrated arloxalkylcar-
boxylic  acid wastes, because  of the lack of supporting data on soil
surface  application, incineration is the only recommended process.

-------
                             7.  REFERENCES
0062.  Kennedy, M. V., B. J. Stojanovic, and F. L. Shuman, Jr.   Chemical
         and thermal methods for disposal of pesticides.   Residue Reviews,
         29: 89-104, 1969.

0063.  Kennedy, M. V., B. J. Stojanovic, and F, L. Shuman, Jr.   Chemical
         and thermal aspects of pesticide control.  Journal of Environ-
         mental Quality. 1  (1): 63-65, Jan. 1972.

0225.  American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists.
         Threshold limit values for 1971.  Occupational  Hazards, p.35-40,
         Aug. 1971.

0278.  Code of Federal Regulations.  Title 49--transportation, parts 71
         to 90.  (Revised as of January 1, 1967).  Washington, U.S.
         Government Printing Office, 1967.  794p.

0441.  Robeck, 6. G., K. A. Dostal, J. M. Cohen, and J.  F. Kreissl.
         Effectiveness of water treatment processes in pesticide removal.
         Journal of American Water Works Association, 57(2): 181-199,
         Feb. 1965.

       Whitehouse, J. D.  A study of the removal of pesticides from water.
         Research Report No.8, Water Resources Institute, University of
         Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, 1967.  175 p.

       Faust, S.D., and 0. M. Aly.  Water pollution by organic pesticides.
         Journal of American Water Works Association. 56(3): 267-279,
         Mar. 1964.

       The Working Group on Pesticides.  Ground disposal  of pesticides:
         the problem and criteria for guidelines.  Washington, U.S.
         Government Printing Office, 1970. 55 p.

       Finkelstein, H., Comp. Air pollution aspects of pesticides.
         Report prepared for the National Air Pollution Control
         Administration by Litton Systems, Inc., Bethesda, Maryland
         under Contract No. PH-22-68-25.  Washington, U.S. Government
         Printing Office, 1969.  173 p.

0509.  Metcalf, R. L.  The chemistry and biology of pesticides, In_
         pesticides in the environment, v.l part 1. Ed.  by R. White-
         Stevens.  New York, Marcel Dekker, Inc., 1971.  p.1-144.

0536.  Water quality criteria.  Report of the National Technical Advisory
         Committee to the Secretary of the Interior.  April 1, 1968.
         Washington, Federal Water Pollution Control Administration.
         234 p.
0445.
0446.
0448.
0449.

-------
0620.  The Working Group on Pesticides.   Information available on disposal
         of surplus pesticides, empty containers and emergency situations.
         Washington, U. S. Government Printing Office, 1970.  52 p.

0621.  The Working Group on Pesticides.   Summary of interim guidelines  for
         disposal of surplus or waste pesticides and pesticide containers.
         Washington, U.S. Government Printing Office, 1970.  25 p.

1035.  Lambden, A. E., and D. H. Sharp.   Treatment of effluents from the
         manufacture of weedkillers and  pesticides.  Manufacturing Chemist,
         31: 198-201, May 1960.

1277.  Bailey, J. B., and J. E. Swift.   Pesticide information and safety
         manual.  Berkeley, California,  University of California,
         Agricultural  Extension Service, 1968. 147 p.

1610.  Pesticides: present and future.   Chemical Engineering, 76 (8):
         133-140, Apr. 7, 1969.

1618.  Melnikov, W. N.  Chemistry of the pesticides.  New York, Springer-
         Verlag, 1971. 480 p.

1630.  Mills, R.E.  Development of design criteria for biological  treat-
         ment of an industrial effluent  containing 2,4-D waste water.
         Proceedings; l4th Industrial Waste Conference, Purdue University,
         Lafayette, Indiana, 1963.  p.340-358.

1631.  Sharp, D. H.  The disposal of waste materials in the pesticide
         industry.  J_n_ Disposal of industrial waste materials: papers
         to be read at the Conference at Sheffield University. 17th-19th
         April, 1956.   London, England,  Society of Chemical  Industry,
         1956. p. 9-15.

1635.  Sigworth, E. A.  Identification and removal of herbicides and
         pesticides.  Journal of American Water Works Association, 57(8):
         1016-1022, Aug. 1965.

1636.  Aly, O.M., and S. D. Faust.  Removal of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic
         derivatives from natural waters.  Journal of American Water Works
         Association.  57(2): 221-230, Feb. 1965.

1718.  United States Tariff Commission.   Synthetic organic chemicals:
         United States production and sales, 1970.  Washington, U.S.
         Government Printing Office, 1972.  262 p.

1743.  Halswitt, C., and J. A. Mraz.  HC1 removed from chlorinated organic
         waste.  Chemical Engineering.   79 (11): 80-81, May 15, 1972.

1754.  Goulding, R. L.  Waste pesticide  management annual progress report,
         July 1, 1970 - April 12, 1971.   Environmental Sciences Center,
         Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon.  8 p.
                                     69

-------
1755.   Goulding, R. K.,  M.  L.  Montgomery,  and W.  S.  Stanton.   Waste
         pesticide management interim progress report,  26  January, 1972.
         Environmental  Health Services Center, Oregon  State University,
         Con/all is, Oregon.  34 p.

1756.   Schwartz, H. G.   Adsorption of selected pesticides  on  activated
         carbon and mineral  surfaces.   Environmental Science  and  Tech-
         nology, 1(4):  332-337, Apr.  1967.

1757.   Schwartz, H. G.   Microbial  degradation of  pesticides in aqueous   .
         solutions.  Journal of Hater Pollution Control  Federation,
         39(10): 1701-1714,  Oct.  1967.

1774.   Personal communication.  A. Livingston, Blue  Spruce Co.  to C.C. Shin,
         TRW Systems, May 25, 1972.   2,4-D  manufacture.

1775.   Personal communication.  G. Lawrence,  Diamond Shamrock Chemical Co.
         to C. C. Shih,  TRW  Systems,  May 26,  1972.   2,4-D  manufacture.

1776.   Personal communication.  D. Robinson,  Rhodia  Inc.,  Chipman Division
         to C. C. Shih,  TRW  Systems,  May 25,  1972.   2,4-D  manufacture
         waste treatment.

1777.   Personal communication.  R. Gitschlag, Rhodia Inc., Chipman Division
         to C. C. Shih,  TRW  Systems,  May 25,  1972.   2,4-D  manufacture
         waste treatment.

1778.   Personal communication.  F. Chase,  Dow Chemical  Co., to C. C. Shih,
         TRW Systems, May 26, 1972.   2,4-D  manufacture  waste  treatment.

1779.   Personal communication.  W. Reynolds,  Hercules  Inc., to C. C. Shih,
         TRW Systems, May 26, 1972.   2,4-D  manufacture  waste  treatment.

1781.   Sidwell, A. E.  Biological  treatment of chlorophenolic wastes.
         Environmental  Protection  Agency,  Water Quality Office, Water
         Pollution Control  Research Series  12130  EGK.   Washington, U.S.
         Government Printing Office,,  June 1971.  177 p.

1789.   Aly, O.M., and S. D.  Faust.  Studies on the  removal of 2,4-D  and
         2,4-DCP from surface waters.   Proceedings;  18th Industrial
         Waste Conference,  Purdue  University, Lafayette, Indiana, 1963.
         p.6-8.
                                  70

-------
                                  HAZARDOUS WASTES PROPERTIES
                                         WORKSHEET


H. M. Name    2.4-i) (135)
                                                              Structural Formula
IUC Name  2,4-Ui chlorophenoxyaceti c  acid
Common Names
                                                           rr1
Molecular Wt.     221.05	   Melting Pt.     13S-14Qr.       Boiling  Pt.

Density (Condensed)	@	Density (gas)	@	

Vapor Pressure (recommended  55  C  and 20 0

    0.4 mm    &
Flash Point	        Autoignition Temp.
Flammability Limits  in  Air  (wt %)    Lower	    Upper_

Explosive Limits  in  Air (wt. %)      Lower	    Upper_
Solubility
    Cold Water    0.06% at 25C         Hot Water                      Ethanol
    Others:   Highly soluble in ether, benzene, carbon tetrachloride,  acetone, and tetra and
             pentachloroethanes vt'
Acid, Base Properties     A typical organic acid that readily  forms sodium,
     and ammonia salts.
Highly Reactive with
Compatible with
Shipped in  fiber drums and bags.
ICC Classification	  Coast Guard Classification
Comments   2,4-D Is a white crystalline substance when pure and has practically no odor;
   technical grade compound, however, smells more orlp^^ lii»»
References (1) 0509

           (2) 1618
                                             71

-------
                             PROFILE REPORTS ON
                         ORGANOPHOSPHORUS PESTICIDES

           Methyl  Parathion (274).  Parathion (321),  Demeton (491),
                               Guthion  (495)

                               1.   GENERAL

                               Introduction

     The practical  development of organophosphorus insecticides  is  largely
due to the original  extensive work of G.  Schrader beginning in  1937.   Thou-
sands of organophosphorus compounds of many types have been evaluated  for
insecticidal properties and the current commercially used compounds include
insecticides that are marketed in multimillion pound quantities.  The  num-
ber of highly toxic  organophosphorus compounds is virtually limitless  and
their suitability as insecticides depends on their physical and chemical
properties and how safely they may be employed.  Of the four organophosphorus
insecticides included in this Profile Report: parathion and methyl  parathion
represent the two most widely used broad spectrum organophosphorus  insecti-
cides, demeton is one of the more successful plant systemic insecticides,
and Guthion is one of the most toxic organophosphorus insecticides  with
prolonged activity.

     Organophorphorus insecticides are among the fastest growing products
in the pesticide industry.  The U.S. production figures for parathion  and
methyl parathion from the year 1960 to 1967 are:0449'1610
 Parathion
 Methyl  Parathion  1^94
Annual Production (Thousand Ib)
1960 1961 1962 1963 1964
7,434
11794
8,423 8,786 — — 12,768
18£27 16,156 15^99 18£40
1965
16,607
29; 11
1966
19,444
35,862
1967
11,361
33344
                                   73

-------
Individual production figures for Guthion and demeton are not available,  but
                                      0449
based on the quantities used on crops,     it is estimated that 4,142,000
Ib of Guthion and 377,000 Ib of demeton were manufactured in 1964.   The four
organophosphorus insecticides investigated in this Profile Report  accounted
for approximately 60 percent of the total organophosphorus insecticide
production in 1964.0449

                               Manufacture
      Parathion  and Methyl  Parathlon.  Both  insecticides are manufactured from
sodium p-nitrophenolate; parathion by reacting 0,0-diethyl phosphorothio-
chloridate with the sodium compound, and methyl  parathion from the  reaction
                                        1 f\ 1 ft
of the equivalent 0,0-dimethyl compound     :
         (R0)2   P  Cl  +  NaO-/  V-NO?   -»  (R0}2 P -0-^   V--N0? + NaCl
This process is usually carried out in aqueous medium or in organic solvents
(chlorobenzene, xylene, aliphatic ketones).  The phosphorothiochloridates
necessary for the synthesis of the parathions are prepared by reacting the
appropriate alcohol with phosphorus pentasulfide, followed by chlorination
1618
                     4 ROM + P2S5  -» 2(RO)2 PSH + H2$


                2(RO) PSH + 3 C12  -» 2(RO)2 PCI + 2HC1 + $2C12

     Large scale commercial facilities for the manufacture of parathion and
                                                            1592  1531
methyl parathion in the United States include the following     '     :

     Kerr-McGee Chemical Corporation, Hamiltion, Mississippi
     Kerr-McGee Chemical Corporation, Los Angeles, California
     Monsanto Chemical Company, Anniston, Alabama
     Stauffer Chemical Company, Mount Pleasant, Tennessee
                                      74

-------
     Demeton.   Demeton is produced by the reaction of 0,0-diethyl  phosphoro-
thiochloridate with 2-hydroxydiethyl  sulfide in the presence of sodium hydroixde
                                 1 filfl
or carbonate of the alkali metals    :
                   (C2H50)2  P Cl  + HOCH2CH2 SCgHg + NaOH
f,
                                                     NaCl
Demeton contains approximately two parts of the thiono-isomer and one part
of the thiol-isomer, and the thiono-isomer compound obtained is partially
isomerized directly in the process of preparation.
     Guthion.  Guthion is produced by the reaction of the N-halomethyl
derivatives of azimidobenzoyl with salts of dimethyldithiosphosphoric
acid1618:
                        (QUO),     a       |             2       32 + NaBr
                           3  2        -»
When the methylbromo derivative is used, Guthion is obtained in almost
quantitative yield.  The 4-oxo-3,4-dihydro-l,2-,3-benzotriazine necessary
for the synthesis can be prepared from the amide of anthranilic acid by
                                           ifil ft
the action of sodium nitrite in acid medium    :
                      +HN02           -            N     .:         +2H2°
                                   75

-------
     Both demeton and Guthion are manufactured by Chemagro Corporation at
their Kansas City, Missouri facility.

                                   Uses
     The principal application areas of the four organophosphorus in-
secticides have been summarized by Van Wazer     (Table 1).

                    Sources and Types of Pesticide Wastes
     The sources of pesticide wastes may include the following   :
     (1) Pesticide manufactures; (2) pesticide formulators;  (3) pesticide
wholesalers; (4) professional applicators; (5) cooperage facilities that
recondition drums; (6) agricultural users; (7) government facilities that
store, transport, and use pesticides; (8) urban and suburban home and home
garden users; (9) commercial and industrial processes including those from
rug and fabric treatment facilities manufacturing plants9 hospitals, etc.

     In general, pesticide wastes can be classified as either diluted or
concentrated wastes.  Diluted pesticide wastes include those generated in
the waste waters of the manufacturers, formulators, agricultural runoffs,
and possibly spent caustic solutions used to clean empty pesticide con-
tainers.  Concentrated pesticide wastes include any unused or contaminated
pesticides, pesticide materials left in containers after emptying, sludges
formed in treating waste water containing pesticides, sawdust or straw used
to soak up accidental pesticide spills.

       Organophosphorus  pesticides  appear  as waste  stream constituents
  in  varied  forms  and  concentrations.   Typical  waste  streams containing
  organophosphorus  pesticides are as  follows:
       Aqueous  slurries  containing  10 percent  mixed Malathion   •
       and Parathion;  5  to  7 percent  mixed intermediates;
       3  to  4  percent  carbaryls;  5  to 10 percent  diatomoceous
       earth;  3  to  5  percent organic  solvents

-------
                    TABLE 1  162°
APPLICATION AREAS OF ORGANOPHOSPHORUS INSECTICIDES
Crops
Insecticides
Guthion
Methyl
Parathion
Parathion
Demeton
Cotton
X
X '
X
x •
Fruits,
Fruit, Deciduous
Citrus & Nuts
X

X X
X
Grasses Orna-
& Forage ments


X X
X X
Sugar
Small Cane
Potatoes Grains & Beets

X
XXX
X '
Soy Stored
Beans Crops Tobacco Vegetables
X
X
X X X


-------
     Solid wastes containing 0.5 percent parathions
     Process solution containing 10 percent demeton and Guthion.
     Solid wastes containing 0.5 percent demeton and Guthion.
More detailed information relating to the forms and quantities of waste
organophosphorus pesticides is presented in the Appendix Volume titled
Waste Forms and Quantities.

                   Physical and Chemical Properties

     The physical and chemical properties of the four organophosphorus
insecticides are included in the attached worksheets.  Since demeton
contains a mixture of 0,0-diethyl 0-(and S-) ethyl-2-thioethyl phosphoro-
thioates, individual property worksheets for the thiono-isomer and the
thiol-isomer are also attached.

                            2.  TOXICOLOGY

     All the organophosphorus insecticides function by the common mechanism
of cholinesterase inhibition.  The enzyme cholinesterase is an essential
constituent of the nervous system not only of the Insecta but also of all
higher  animalss  and  when  inhibited  is no longer able  to  carry out  its normal
function of rapid removal  and destruction  of the neurohormone acetylcholine
from the nervous synapse.  As a  result,  acetycholine  accumulates and disrupts
the normal  functioning  of the nervous system,  giving  rise to  the typical
cholinergic systems  associated with  0-P  poisoning.   In insects the  poisoning
leads to hyperactivety, tremors,  convulsions,  paralysis, and  death.   In
higher  animals,  these cholinergic effects  are  translated into muscarinic
effects such as  nausea, salivation9  lacrimation and myosis; nicotinic effects
such as muscular fasciculations,  and central effects  such as giddiness,
tremulousness, coma, and  convulsions.      The  symptoms of poisoning are
usually rapid in onset, and death caused by respiratory failure can occur
within a few minutes to several hours following  exposure.  In cases of
oral ingestion death has  been essentially instantaneous.
                                  78

-------
     The four organophosphorus insecticides included in this Profile Report
are all highly toxic and exhibit similar toxicity symptoms, although the
toxicity of methyl parathion for higher animals is somewhat lower and both
methyl parathion and Guthion penetrate the skin with greater difficulty than
parathion or demeton.  All four organophosphorus insecticides can be absorbed
through the skin and excessive skin contact can lead to death.  Special
precautions should be taken to prevent both skin contamination and inhalation.

     The relative acute oral and dermal LD5Q values of the four organo-
phosphorus insecticides to the rat range from 2 to 14 mg/kg and 7 to 220
mg/kg and are representative of the hazards associated with the use of
specific insecticides (Table 2).  Demeton contains both the thiol-isomer
and the thiono-isomer, and the thiol-isomer has been identified to be far
more toxic than the thiono-isomer; the respective acute oral LDKn values
                                1618
to the rat are 1.5 and 30 mg/kg.      The American Conference of Governmental
Industrial Hygienists 1971 recommended Threshold Limit Values (TLV) for the
compounds  in  mg/M3 of air are0225:parathion, 0.1; methyl parathion, 0.2;
demeton, 0.1; Guthion (azinphosmethyl)0.2.
     The 48-hour median tolerance limits (TLm) for the organophosphorus
insecticides for various types of fresh water organisms have been established
by the Federal Water Pollution Control Administration (Table 3).  To provide
reasonably safe concentrations of these materials in receiving waters,
application factors of 1/100 should be used with these values.  Another
comparision of the toxicity of the organophosphorus insecticides to fish
life are their 96-hour TL  values for the bluegill sunfish in mg/liter:
                                                         1611
parathion, 0.095; methyl parathion, 1.9; Guthion, 0.0052.      These data
indicate that Guthion is the most toxic of the organophosphorus insecticides
to fish life, and possibly to other forms of aquatic life.
     Most of the organophosphorus insecticides do not accumulate in animal
tissues.  However, Guthion has been found in fish several weeks after being
exposed in laboratory experiments to sub-lethal concentrations in water.

-------
                                 TABLE 2

                     ACUTE  ORAL  AND  DERMAL  LD
                                            50
                                                VALUES
           OF  ORGANOPHOSPHORUS  INSECTICIDES  FOR WHITE RATS
                                                         1277
Insecticides
Pa rath ion
Methyl Parathion
Demeton
Guthion
Oral LD5f)
Males
13
14
6.2
13
(mg/kg)
Females
3.6
24
2.5
, 11
Dermal
Males
21
67
14
220
LD5Q (mg/kg)
Females
6.8
67
8.2
220
                                 TABLE  3

                  48-HOUR TLm  VALUES  FROM STATIC BIOASSAY
                       (in micrograms  per  liter)
                                               0536
Insecticides
               Stream
               Invertebrate
               Species
                       Cladocerans    Fish
                TL_               TL
                       Species
m
               Gammarus
          TLm  Lacustris
m Species   m        TLm
                                11     D.  pulex   0.4 Bluegill  47         6


                                      D.  magna   4.8 Bluegill  8000

                                      D.  pulex   14  Bluegill  8181

                                 8     D.  magna   0.2 Rainbow t.  1U     0.3
Parathion

Methyl
Parathion
       *
Demeton

Guthion
P.Californica
P.Californica
 * This is listed as demelton in.the orginial  table.
                                  80

-------
                             3.   OTHER HAZARDS
     Parathion and metyl  parathion are unstable to heat.   Parathion should
not be heated above 100 Cs and methyl  parathion may explode at 120 C.   For
an adequate safety margin, methyl parathion should not be heated above
55 C.      When heated to decomposition, all four organophosphorus in-
secticides emit highly toxic fumes of nitrogen oxides, phosphorus, and
sulfur compounds.

     The fire hazards of organophosphorus insecticides are relatively  slight
and are far outweighed by their health hazards.  Parathion has a flash point
   ©
of about 120 C, and 80 percent methyl  parathion in xylene has a flash  point
of 46 C.  The hazards from fires involving organophosphorus insecticides
have been investigated     and it was  concluded that:  first, most of the
insecticide is destroyed by decomposition before it can evaporate; second,
over 90 percent of the evaporting insecticide is destroyed by the flames;
and third, the evaporating portion is considerably diluted by the time it
reaches anyone.  When all these factors are considered, it is apparent
that a fire involving tons of organophosphorus insecticides may occur  without
causing serious injury to anyone nearby.

                4.  DEFINITION OF ADEQUATE WASTE MANAGEMENT

                   Handling. Storage,  and Transportation

     Great care should be exercised in handling the organophosphorus in-
secticides because of their high toxicity and the dangers of absorption
through the skin.  The use of rubber glovess goggles, a respirator, and
other protective clothing is advisable.  Any material spilled on the skin
should be immediately removed with plenty of water and soap.  If clothing
has been contaminated, it should be removed as soon as possible and the
skin washed as above.      Periodic examination of blood cholinesterase
levels is also of value in the early detection of over-exposure.

-------
     Organophosphorus insecticides should be stored in well  ventilated
areas in a separate building, away from any foodstuffs, feeds, or any other
material intended for consumption by humans or animals.      In addition,
they should not be stored near sources of heat such as furnaces, heating
kettles, and steam lines.  Ample warning  signs should be posted in storage
areas.

     Adequate procedures for the transportation of parathion and methyl
parathion have been established by the Department of Transportation.
Label requirements, as well as the maximum quantites permitted to be
shipped in one outside container, are also specified.  Although shipping
regulations for demeton and Guthion are not specifically mentioned in
                                                                          9
the reference, the same rules governing the transportation of the parathions
should also apply here.

     The National Agricultural Chemicals Associations has established a
Pesticide Safety Team Network with Area Coordinators throughout the country
to provide nationwide 24-hour emergency service.  The network became operational
on March 9, 1970 (with a central telephone number:  [513] 916-4300) and
should be consulted in all cases of accidents, spills, leakage, fires, and
other types of disasters involving Organophosphorus insecticides.

                              Disposal/Reuse

     Contaminated or degraded Organophosphorus insecticides could not  be
practically considered for reprocessing.  The safe disposal of the
insecticides  is  defined  in terms of provisional limits in the atmosphere
and  a potable water source and/or marine  habitat.  The provisional
limits are as follows:

-------
Contaminant                                                      Basis for
  in Air                  Provisional Limits                   Recommendation
Parathion                     0.001 mg/M3                        0.01(TLV
Methyl Parathion              0.002 mg/M3                        0.01 TLV
Demeton                       0.001 mg/M3                        0.01 TLV
Guthion                       0.002 mg/M3                        0.01 TLV

   Contaminant                                                   Basis for
In Mater and Soil         Provisional Limits                   Recommendation
Parathion                   0.005 ppm (mg/1)                    Stokinger &
                                                                  Woodward Method
Methyl Parathion            0.01 ppm (mq/1)                     Stokinger &
                                                                  Woodward Method
Demeton                     0.005 ppm (mg/1)                    Stokinger &
                                                                  Woodward Method
Guthion                     0.01 ppm (mg/1)                     Stokinger &
                                                                  Woodward Method

     The recommended criterion for release of the organophbsphorus
insecticides to the water environment is so low that none of these
insecticides (with the possible exception of methyl parathion) should
be applied directly in or near the marine habitat without danger of
causing damage.  To meet the provisional limits, effluents from plants
treating waste water containing the organophosphorus insecticides must
normally be diluted in municipal sewers (with an approximate dilution
ratio of 10:1) or large creeks or holdings ponds before discharge to
lakes, rivers, or oceans.

     The permissible criteria for the organophosphorus insecticides in
the surface water for public water suppl-ies, however, is much higher and
the limit  established relative to parathion is expressed as 0.1 mg/liter
parathion equivalent.       This equivalence is the ratio that a given
cholinergic insecticide has to parathion as unity in its cholinesterase
inhibiting properties.
  These limits have been set with relation only to human intake directly from
  a related domestic water supply and do not take into account the consequence
  of higher and possible objectionable concentrations in fish available to be
  eaten by man.

-------
           5.  EVALUATION OF CURRENT AND NEAR FUTURE DISPOSAL PROCESSES

                          Dilute Pesticide Wastes
     Option No.1 - Adsorption with Powdered Activated Carbon.   The effectiveness
of powdered activated carbon on the removal of parathion from water has
been reported by Robeck et al    and Sigworth.      Robeck et al investigated
initial parathion concentrations ranging from about 1 to 10 ppb and found
that over 99 percent of the parathion could be removed with powdered activated
carbon dosages of 5 to 20 ppm.  Sigworth1s studies were conducted with higher
initial parathion concentrations of 10 ppm and concluded that 5 ppm carbon
dosages in a treatment plant could be expected to give 75 percent removal.,
whereas dosages of 10 ppm would accomplish 90 percent removal of most of
the pesticides in extensive use today.  The necessary carbon dosage and
the associated degree of removal  for methyl parathion, demeton, and
Guthion should be in the same range as those for parathion.  Although the
addition of powdered activated carbon to a liquid solution followed by
stirring and filtration is not necessarily the best method when large quantities
of aqueous wastes have to be dealt with-, the procedure is indeed an adequate
and acceptable technique for treating dilute organophosphorus pesticide
wastes.
                                                                  *
     Option No.2 - Adsorption with Granular Activated-Carbon Beds.   The
effectiveness of granular activated-carbon beds to remove parathion from
                                                 0441
water has also been investigated by Robeck et al.      Following passage
through two carbon columns, it was found that the parathion concentration
in water was reduced from 11.4 ppb to 0.05 ppb.  Treatment of waste water
containing a variety of pesticide wastes with granular activated-carbon
bed have been practiced by Fisons Pest Control Ltd., in England since
1955,          where over 99  percent removal of the pesticides  is obtained.
The treated effluent is diluted with river water before discharge to the
river, and the results of government biological surveys indicated no effects
 *
   The contaminated carbon may be regenerated in a multi-hearth furnace under
   a controlled atmosphere at temperatures in excess of 1,600 F, so that the
   adsorbed impurities are voltali zed and selectively oxidized from the surface
   of the carbon.

-------
of the discharge on the river.  Chemagro's organophosphorus pesticide
plant at Kansas City, Missouri, which also manufactures demeton and
Guthion, is at the present considering the installation of granular
activated-carbon beds for the treatment of waste water generated at the
plant.      Because of the adequate contact time provided and the fact
that it is a well established chemical engineering unit operation,
adsorption with granular activated-carbon beds should be considered as
one of the most satisfactory methods for treating dilute organophosphorus
pesticide wastes.

     Option No.3 - Alkaline Hydrolysis.  All the four organophosphorus
insecticides considered in this Profile Report are readily hydrolyzed in
alkaline medium.  Ketelaar reported the hydrolysis constants of parathion
and methyl parathion in alkaline solution at 15 C as 0.00215 and 0.0092
liter min   mol~ , respectively.      The actual reaction rate is
bimolecular and depends on the hydroxyl ion concentration in the solution.
The half life times for parathion and methyl parathion in a 1 N hydroxide
                                                                     1 /-I o
solution are 32 min and 7.5 min respectively.  According to Melnikov,
the time for 50 percent hydrolysis of the thiono-isomer of demetion at
20 C and pH 13 is 75 min and that of the thiol-isomer is 0.85 min.  The
hydrolysis rate of Guthion in alkaline medium is not available directly,
                 1 fil ft
although Melnikov     indicates at pH 5 50 percent of the Guthion is
hydrolyzed at 20 C in 240 days and that in alkaline solution Guthion
breaks down several times faster.  From this information, it is apparent
that alkaline hydrolysis in a properly designed mixing tank with sufficient
residence time is an adequate process for treating dilute parathion,
methyl parathion, and demeton wastes.  The Kerr-McGee Los Angeles Plant,
which manufactures parathion and methyl parathion, treats its waste
water by alkaline hydrolysis in a tank followed by a holding lagoon
                                        1529
before discharge to the municipal sewer.

     Option No.4 - Activated Sludge Treatment.   Stutz     and Coley and
Stutz1039 reported the biological treatment of waste water containing -
parathion and methyl parathion manufacturing wastes by the activated
sludge process at Monsanto's Anniston, Alabama plant.  The processing
                                   85

-------
steps for waste treatment involve chlorination, holding in a raw waste
lagoon, limestone neutralization, and pH adjustment with soda ash or
caustic before feeding to the activated sludge unit.  Plant effluent
analysis indicates parathion concentrations less than 0.1  mg/liter, and
since the effluent is discharged into a relatively large creek (with an
approximate dilution ratio of 100:1) and then to a river,  a factor of
safety for fish toxicity of at least 100:1 is provided.  The biological
treatment of waste waters containing demeton and Guthion with an
aerated lagoon preceding the activated sludge unit has been investigated
by Lue-Hing and Brady on the pilot scale,     and the system developed
was found to be totally effective for detoxification.  As  a result of the
successful study, a full scale design with a two-stage activated sludge
process has been proposed as the secondary waste water treatment unit at
Chemagro's Kansas City, Missouri organophosphorus pesticide manufacturing
facility.  As of today, however, Chemagro is still conducting studies with
a 1/5 full scale aeration tank in its secondary waste water treatment
effort.      With proper biological acclimation, the activated sludge
process preceded by the necessary primary waste treatment steps is an
adequate and satisfactory method for treating dilute organophosphorus
pesticide wastes.

     Option No.5 - Removal by Surface Active Agents.  The removal of
pesticides from water by the use of surface active agents to produce a
                                         0445
foam has been investigated by Whitehouse.      Although organophosphorus
pesticides were not included innthe study, the results with aldrin and
dieldrin showed that up to 90 percent removal was attainable and
demonstrated the value of the process as a possible treatment method
for other types of pesticides.

     The other treatment processes for the removal of organophosphorus
insecticides from water that have been investigated include coagulation
followed by sand filtration, and chemical oxidation with chlorine, potassium
                        0441
permanganate, and ozone.      Organophosphorus insecticides are not removed
by coagulation and filtration, and in the case of parathion, chemical

-------
oxidation will sometimes render the more toxic paraoxon as a product.
These processes are therefore considered as  inadequate methods for
treating dilute organophosphorus pesticide wastes.

                      Concentrated Pesticide Wastes

     Option No.l - Incineration.  The complete and controlled high
temperature oxidation of organophosphorus insecticides in air or oxygen
with adequate scrubbing and ash disposal facilities offers the greatest
immediate potential for the safe disposal of these pesticides.  The
research on incineration of pesticides conducted by Kennedy et al at
Mississippi State University has led to the conclusion that temperatures
at or nearvl ,800jF will be sufficient to degrade 99 percent or more of
most reagent-grade pesticides and commercial pesticidal formulations.     '
      It is expected that either a rotary kiln or liquid combustor,
depending upon the form of the waste, followed by secondary combustion
and scrubbing would be an acceptable disposal method.  Primary combustion
should be carried out at a minimum of 1,500 F for at least 0.5 seconds
with secondary combustion at a minimum temperature of 2,200 F for at
least 1.0 second.  The equilibrium product distributions resulting from
the thermal decomposition and combustion of parathion at atmospheric
pressure and three temperatures, 2,190 F (1,200 C), 1,470 F (800 C),
930 F (500 C), have been computed using the TRW Chemical Analysis Program
(Table 4), and the results indicate the possible formation of objectionable
                                            &
combustion products such as hydrogen sulfide  and phosphorus oxides.  As
the same combustion products will  be obtained in the incineration of the
other three organophosphorus insecticides, an adequate gas clean up
system must be installed to alleviate the air pollution problem.  Monsanto's
Anniston, Alabama parathion and methyl parathion manufacturing facility
uses incineration to dispose of its semi-solid residue wastes, and has
proven that an aqueous scrubbing system followed by a mist eliminator is
effective in recovering 99.9 percent of the phosphorus pentoxide.
*
  A higher air/fuel ratio will lead to the formation of sulfur dioxide
  instead of hydrogen sulfide.
                                   87

-------
                                                       TABLE 4
                                  EQUILIBRIUM  COMPOSITION  OF PARATHION/AIR SYSTEM
                                   (1  Atm Pressure) MOLE FRACTION,  GAS PHASE**1"
                                                                                                       Condensed
Wt. %                                                                                                  Phase Graphite
Pest1c1dt   Temp.      CH^        CO       COo	H2       O      HCN     H=S       N;       P40£   Mol/IOOG Feed
    100     1200 C   6.584-4   3.784-1    1.229-4   4.795-1  3.834-4  1.572-4  5.140-2  3.025-2      -          1.693
             800 C   1.224-2   2.812-1    1.129-2   5.142-1  1.890-2     -     9.095-2  4.631-2  2.316-2        2.298
             500 C   1.460-1   1.983-2    9.855-2   2.568-1  2.467-1     -     1.322-1  6.622-2  3.314-2        2.748
     70     1200 C   3.384-4   3.693-1    1.171-4   3.438-1  2.683-4  3.417-4  3.538-2  1.993-1      -          0.740
             800 C   5.736-3   2.937-1    1.230-2   3.520-1  1.351-2     -     6.082-2  2.446.1  1.564-2        1.199
             500 C   6.884-2   2.170-2    1.181-1   1.764-1  1.854-1     -     8.288-2  3.254-1  2.081-2        1.800
     50     1200 C   1.795-4   3.632-1    1.132-4   2.504-1  1.921-4  3.700-4  2.424-2  3.208-1      -          0.105
             800 C   2.854-3   3.020-1    1.301-2   2.483-1  9.799-3     -     4.195-2  3.695-1  1.092-2        0.461
             500 C   3.465-2   2.319-2    1.347-1   1.251-1  1.405-1     -     5.545-2  4.719-1  1.395-2        1.123
     20     1200 C      -      8.885-2    1.109-1   3.222-2  9.896-2     -     9.140-3  6.484-1  5.013-3
             800 C      -      6.655-2    1.342-1   4.287-2  7.917-2     -     1.913-2  6.521-1  5.042-3
             500 C   5.524-3   2.581-2    1.669-1   4.995-2  6.245-2     -     2.017-2  6.637-1  5.132-3        0.022
~*SiialT amounts  of CS2,  COS, P2, P4, and $2 are also present at 1200  C.
  The data format used  is  an exponential form, i.e.
 t                          -4
 Mole fractions less than 10   are Indicated by -.
                                                                                -Y
The data format used  is  an exponential form, i.e., X.XX-Y is  equivalent to X.XX 10

-------
The other major air pollutant of concern, sulfur dioxide, is undoubtedly
removed by the same system.  Properly designed and operated incineration
is therefore considered as the best present and near future method for
the disposal of concentrated organophosphorus pesticide wastes.

     Option No.2 - Chemical Degradation.  The use of chemical reagents to
decompose concentrated pesticide wastes to less toxic forms has also been
investigated by Kennedy et ai.0062>0063 The Mississippi  State work has shown
that: (1) sulfuric and nitric acids are not effective in destroying the
organophosphorus pesticide malathion; (2) sodium hydroxide from 2N.to 8N
concentration will break down malathion sufficiently to yield inorganic
phosphates; and (3) liquid ammonia and metallic sodium or lithium will
completely decompose  malathion, but the reagents are dangerous to use
and the toxicity of the degradation products are not known.   Based on the
results to date, treatment with sodium hydroxide is the only recommended
chemical method for the disposal  of concentrated organophosphorus pesticide
wastes.

     Option No.3 - Sanitary Landfill.  Soil burial of organophosphorus
pesticide wastes, because of their relatively short persistence time in
                            D7f)fi DdRR
soil of one to three months,    '     is a satisfactory means of disposal
provided the site is acceptable from a geologic and ground water hydrology
standpoint and has been approved as a sanitary landfill  by appropriate
                                                                       ;ra1
                                                                          0448
authorities.       The practice of disposing large quantities of concentrated
pesticides at any one sanitary landfill site, however, is not recommended.

     Option No.4 - Deep Hell.  Although a properly planned, properly designed,
properly constructed, and properly operated deep well disposal installation
is an expensive investment, it may still be the only economic alternative
for pesticide manufacturers and large f emulators to dispose of large
volumes of pesticide wastes from productive operations,  however, the
method is uneconomical for the occasional disposal of small volume  pesticide
wastes.  The solubility in water of the four organophosphorus insecticides
considered in this report are: parathion, 24 ppm; methyl paration, 50 ppm;

-------
demeton, 60 ppm; Guthion, 30 ppm.  Because of the potential contamination
of ground water, deep well disposal of organophosphorus pesticide wastes
is not recommended by the National Working Group on Pesticides,     and
the method should be considered only under very special situations where
hazards would be nonexistent.

     The disposal of organophosphorus pesticide wastes in open pits,
lagoons, unapproved landfill sites, and by on-site burning or deep-sea
burial are not recommended practices because of the obvious contribu-
tions to air and water pollution.

     To summarize, the adequate methods for treating dilute organophosphorus
insecticides are:  (1) adsorption with powdered activated carbon;  (2) adsorption
with activated-carbon beds;  (3) alkaline hydrolysis (except for Guthion);
and  (4) activated  sludge  treatment.  The adequate methods for the disposal
of concentrated organophosphorus pesticide wastes are: (1) incineration;
(2)  chemical degradation  with  2N to 8N sodium hydroxide solution; and (3)
approved sanitary  landfill.

             6.  APPLICABILITY TO NATIONAL DISPOSAL SITES

     It is anticipated that disposal systems to handle both dilute and con-
centrated organphosphorus pesticide wastes will  be required at National
Disposal Sites located near pesticide manufacturers, formulators, and users
and especially agriculture centers.  The dilute pesticide wastes that will
require treatment will include spent cleaning solutions for pesticide
containers and any other pesticide contaminated waste water.   The con-
centrated pesticide wastes that will require treatment include  any surplus,
contaminated, partially or fully degraded pesticides.

-------
     The process recommended for the treatment of dilute organophosphorus

pesticide wastes at National Disposal Sites are:

Process                   Order of Preference                Remarks
Activated-carbon Beds
Activated Sludge
Alkaline Hydrolysis
First choice
Second Choice
Third Choice
Demonstrated technology; also
adequate for removal of most
other types of pesticides from
waste water.

Demonstrated technology;
however„ other types of
pesticides in waste water
may be toxic to bacteria
specially acclimated for
treating organophosphorus
wastes.

Demonstrated technology; but
not applicable to pesticides
that are not readily hydrolyzed
in alkaline medium such as
Guthlon.
      The  only process  recommended  for treating  concentrated  organo-

 phosphorus  pesticide wastes  at National  Disposal  Sites  is  incineration.

 Both  chemical  degradation  with strong alkaline  solution and  sanitary

 landfill  are  not considered  suitable  for the disposal of lar*je  volumes

 of concentrated  pesticide  wastes.


      It should be noted  that the  activated-carbon bed and  the activated

 sludge processes are also  applicable  to  the treatment of other  types of

 dilute organophosphorus  pesticide  wastes, such  as TEPP  and malathion

 wastes.  To treat other  types of  concentrated organophosphorus  pesticide

 wastes, incineration is  again the  only recommended process.

-------
                            7.  REFERENCES
0062. Kennedy, M. V., B. J. Stojanovic, and F. L. Shuman, Jr.  Chemical
        and thermal methods for disposal of pesticides.  Residue Reviews,
        29:89-104, 1969.

0063. Kennedy, M. V., B. J. Stojanovic, and F. L. Shuman, Jr.  Chemical
        and thermal aspects of pesticide disposal.  Journal of Environmental
        Quality, T(l):63-65. Jan.  1972.

0206. Lichtenstein, E. P. Persistence and degradation of pesticides in
        the environment.  J.n_ National Academy of Sciences—National
        Research Council Publication No. 1402, 1966. p.221-229.

0225. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists.
        Threshold limit values for 1971.  Occupational Hazards,
        Aug.  1971.   p.  35-40.

0315. Smith, W. M., and J. 0.  Ledbetter.  Hazards from fires involving
        organophosphorus insecticides.  American Industrial Hygiene
        Association Journal, 32(7):468-474, July 1971.

0441. Robeck, G. G., K. A. Postal, J. M. Cohen, and J. F. Kreissl.
        Effectiveness of water-treatment processes in pesticide removal.
        Journal of American Water Works Association, 57(2):181-199, Feb. 1965.

0445. Whitehouse, J. D., A study of the removal of pesticides from water.
        Research Report No. 8, Water Resources Institute, University of
        Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, 1967.  175 p.

0448. The Working Group on Pesticides.  Ground disposal of pesticides:
        the problem and criteria for guidelines.  Washington, L). S.
        Government Printing Office,  1970.   62  p.

0449. Finkelstein, H.  Preliminary air pollution survey of pesticides; a
        literature review.  Report No. NAPCA-APTD-69-44, PB 188-091.  Silver
        Springs, Maryland, Litton Systems., Inc., Oct. 1969.  169 p.

0509. Metcalf, R. L.  The chemistry and biology of pesticides,  In
        Pesticides in the environment,  v.  1.  Part  1 and 2.  Ed. by R. White-
        Stevens.  New York, Marcel Dekker,  Inc., 1971.  p. 1-144.

0536. Water Quality Criteria.  Report of the National Technical Advisory
        Committee to the Secretary of the Interior.  April 1, 1968.
        Washington, Federal Water Pollution Control  Administration. 234 p.

-------
                        REFERENCES (CONTINUED)


0620. The Working Group on Pesticides.  Information available on disposal
        of surplus pesticides, empty containers and emergency situations.
        Washington, U. S. Government Printing Office, 1970.   52 p.

0621. The Working Group on Pesticides.  Summary of interim guidelines for
        disposal of surplus or waste pesticides and pesticide containers.
        Washington, U. S. Government Printing Office, 1970.   25 p.

0766. Sax, N. I.  Dangerous properties of industrial  materials.  3d ed.
        New York, Reinhold Publishing Company,  1968.   1,251  p.

1035. Lambden, A. E., and D. H. Sharp.  Treatment of effluents from the
        manufacture of weedkillers and pesticides.  Manufacturing Chemist,
        31:198-201, May 1960.

1036. Lue-Hing, C., and S. D. Brady.  Biological  treatment of organic
        phosphorus pesticide waste-waters.   JTI^ Proceedings;  23rd Industrial
        Waste Conference, Purdue University, 1968.  p.1,166-1,177.

1037. Stutz, C. N.  Treating parathion wastes.   Chemical  Engineering
        Progress, 62(10):82-84, Oct.  1968.

1039. Coley, G., and C. N. Stutz.   Treatment of parathion wastes and  other
        organics.  Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation,
        38(8):1,345-1,349, Aug. 1966.

1277. Bailey, J. B., and J. E. Swift.   Pesticide information and safety
        manual.  Berkeley, California, University of California,
        Agricultural Extension Service, 1968.  147 p.

1492. Merck and Company, Inc.  The Merck index of chemicals  and drugs.
        Rahway, New Jersey, 1960.   1,643 p.

1529. Personal communication.  S.  Clift, Kerr-McGee Chemical Corporation,
        to C. C. Shih, TRW Systems, Apr. 14, 1972.

1531. Personal communication.  J. Bell, Monsanto Chemical Company,  to
        C. C. Shih, TRW Systems, Apr. 14, 1972.

1610. Pesticides:  present and future.  Chemical Engineering, 76(8):
        133-140, Apr. 7, 1969.

1611. Weiss, C. M. Organic pesticides and water pollution.  Public  Works,
        95 (12): 84-87, Dec. 1964.
                                93

-------
                        REFERENCES (CONTINUED)


1613. Ketelaar, J. A.  Chemical  studies on insecticides II-the hydrolysis
        of 0 O'^dimethyl-and-dimethyl-0"-p-nitrophenyl  thiophosphate
        (parathion and dimethyl  parathion (E605)).   Recueil  Travaux
        Chemiques de Pays-Bas, 69: 649-658, 1950.

1615. National Agricultural Chemicals Association.   Safety guide for
        warehousing parathions.   Washington, 1968.  19 p.

1617. Metcalf, R. L. Organic insecticides; their chemistry and mode of
        action.  New York, Interscience Publishers  Inc.,  1955.   392 p.

1618. Melnikov, W. N. Chemistry of the pesticides.   New York,
        Springer-Verlag, 1971.  480 p.

1619. Personal communication.  L. Frisbie, Chemagro Corporation, to
        C. C. Shih, TRW Systems, Apr. 19, 1972.

1620. Van Wazer, J. R.  Phosphorus and its compounds,  v. 2.  New York,
        Interscience Publishers, Inc., 1961.  1*100 p.

1631. Sharp, D. H.  The disposal of waste materials in  the pesticide
        industry.  I_n_ Disposal of industrial waste materials:   papers
        to be read at the Conference at Sheffield University.
        17th-19th April, 1956.  London, England, Society of Chemical
        Industry, 1956. p. 9-15.

1635. Sigworth, E. A. Identification and removal of herbicides and
        pesticides.  Journal of American Water Works Association,
        57(8):1,016-1,022, Aug. 1965.
                               94

-------
H. M. Nams Methyl Parathion (274]
IUC Nams 0D0-dim2thyl 0-n-nitronh
Common Mamas OnO-dimsthyl 0-4-nit
Molecular Ht. 263.21^
Density (Condensed) 1.358 @
Vapor Pressure (recommended 55 C
(2)
0.05 nun @ 109 C
Flash Point 46 cI^JLj,,,.^ a
Flanunability Limits in Air (wt %)
Explosive Limits in Air (wt. g)
• Solubility
Cold HaterSS mg/liter at 25 C
HAZARDOUS WASTES PROPERTIES
WORKSHEET
Structural Formula
enylphsophorothioate c
ronhenyH thi ophosphate (CH30)2 PO^\N02

Melting Pt. 36 Ct2) Boiling Pt. ?
20 C(2^ Density (gas) 9 '•
and 20 0
-5 (2)
0.97X10 3nun3 20 C 0
Autolgnition Temp.
Lower Upper j
Lower Upper
(2)
1 ; Hot Mater Ethanol !
Others: xylene
Acid, Base Properties

Highly Reactive with heat and may
explode at temperatures above 120 C

Compatible with

Shipped in one to ten gallon cans and 55 qallon steel drums
ICC Classification Poison B
Coast Guard Classification Poison B I
• Commant<; A white solid, commercial methvl parathion is a liquid j^msisting of 8Qt n*»thyl !'
parathion and 20% xvlene. Decomposes at tenneratures ahnvo ambient and roav develop sufficient
internal pressure to cause the container to ruotuire wiolentlw.


References (1) 0766 \
(2) 1618 ?
(3) 1615
95

-------
                                  HAZARDOUS IdASTES PROPERTIES
                                          WORKSHEET

H. H. Name  p^thinn (321)
                                                               Structural Formula
IUC Name  Q.O-diethyl O.p-nltrophenvlphosphorothioate
Common Names Ethyl Parathion. 0.0-diethyl 0-4-nitrophenvl
             thiophosphate
(c2H5o)2   P  o r   j NOZ
Molecular Wt.    291.27^	    Melting Pt.      6 C^           Boiling  Pt.  375 C
Density (Condensed)  1.26       @  25/4 C	Density (gas)	@	
Vapor Pressure (recommended 55 C and 20 C)
  (L57 X10"5mm@   20 C^_          0.6 mm    @ 157-162 C^         	@	
Flash Point 	         Autoignition Temp.	
Flammability Limits in Air (wt %)    Lower	    Upper	
Explosive Limits in Air (wt.  %)      Lower    	    Upper	

Solubility
    Cold Mater  24 mg/liter^2'	  Hot Water	   Ethanol  soluble
    Others: benzene, xvlene.phthalates. glycols, esters, hetones, toluene,  chloroform,
           "carbon tetrachloride,  animal and vegetable oilsU )
Acid, Base Properties	
Highly Reactive with heat, parathion should not be heated above 100 C and may explode
  at  higher  temperatures	
Compatible with
Shipped in   one to ten gallon  cans  and  55  gallon  steel drums
ICC Classification   Poison B	  Coast Guard Classification  Poison B
 Consents  Yellowish liquid.   It emits highly  toxic  fumes  of nitrogen oxides, phosphorus
  and sulfur when heated to decomposition.	:	
References  (1)   1492
            (2)   1618
            (3)   1615
                                          96

-------
                                  HAZARDOUS WASTES PROPERTIES
                                          WORKSHEET

H. H. Kms   Demeton  (491)
          000-diethyl 0-(and S-) ethyl-2-thioethyl             Structural Formula
IUC Nam. phosphorothioates
Common Names  Systox,, E-1059
PSO
Molecular Wt.  258.34^             Melting Pt. 	    Boiling Pt._
Density (Condensed) 1.1183'2)   @	Density (gas)	
-------
                                  HAZARDOUS WASTES PROPERTIES
                                          WORKSHEET

H.  M. Name  Demeton (thiol-ismoeH (491)
                                                               Structural Formula
IUC Name Q.Q-diethvl  S-2-(ethv1thio)-ethv1
         Phosphorothfoate
Common Names  Svstox (thiol-isomer)	
         0,0-diethyl S-2-ethyl mercaptoethyl
         thiophosphate
                                                                     SCH
                                                                        2
Molecular Wt.  258.34^	    Melting Pt. 	    Boiling  Pt._
Density (Condensed) 1.132^    @	Density (gas)	9	
Vapor Pressure (recommended 55 C and 20 C)
 1 mm	9 128 C(2)           0.25 nn    @100 C(3)           2.6 X10"  mm  9   20
Flash Point 	         Autoignition Temp.	
Flammability Limits in Air (wt %)    Lower	    Upper	
Explosive Limits in Air (wt.  %)      Lower	    Upper	

Solubility
    Cold Water  0.02-0.2%^	  Hot Water	   Ethanol_
    Others:	Highly soluble in most organic solvents
Acid, Base Properties	
Highly Reactive with
Compatible with_
Shipped in_
ICC Classification    Poison B                    Coast Guard Classification
 Comments	Colorless oil
References  (1)  1492
            (2)
            (3)
            (2)   1617
                 1618
                                           98

-------
                                  HAZARDOUS WASTES PROPERTIES
                                          WORKSHEET


H. H. Name  Dematon (thiono-isomer)(491)
                                                               Structural Formula
IUC Name  Q.Q-diethvl Q-? fethvlthioUethyl
          phosphorothioate
Common Names   Q.Q-diethyl 0-2-ethvl mercaptoethyl_	
               thionophosphate , systox  Ithiono-isomer)
Molecular Wt.  258-34	    Melting Pt. 	    Boiling Pt.
Density (Condensed) 1.119^J    9	Density (gas)	9	

Vapor Pressure (recommended 55 C and 20 C)

 1 mm	@  123 V2\       2.5 X1Q"4 mm  @  20 C^3^           Q.4 nm      @ Iflfi P.
Flash Point 	         Autoignition Temp.
Flammability Limits in Air (wt %)    Lower	    Upper_

Explosive Limits in Air (wt.  X)      Lower	    Upper_


Solubility
    Cold Water 0.002-0.02%U)	  Hot Water   	            Ethanol
    Others: Highly soluble in organic solvents, including the petroleum hydrocarbons.

Acid, Base Properties	
Highly Reactive with     Isomerizes very readily to form the thiol-isomer
Compatible with_
Shipped in
ICC Classification   Poison B	  Coast Guard Classification,

Comments  A colorless liquid when pure	
References  (1)  1492

            (2)  1617
            (3)  1618
                                               9,9

-------
Flammability Limits in Air (wt %)    Lower_
Explosive Limits in Air (wt.  %)      Lower
                                  HAZARDOUS HASTES  PROPERTIES
                                          WORKSHEET
H. M. Name   Guthion (49.5)
         0,0 dimethyl S-(l ,2,3-benzotriazinyl-4-keto)-
IUC Name 3-methyl phosphorodithioate
Common Names Azinphosmethyl	 	.	
                                                               Structural  Formula
Molecular Wt.  317.34
                     (1)
Density (Condensed)
                                     Melting Pt.    73-74C
                                    	Density  (gas)
                                                         (1)
Boiling Pt.
Vapor Pressure (recommended 55 C and 20 0
                  20 C^2)
 2.2X10"7 mm
Flash Point
                                   Autoignition Temp.
                                                             Upper_
                                                             Upper_
So'lubil ity
    Cold Water 0.003 %
                      (2)
                                       Hot Water
  Ethanol  soluble
                                                                                      (1)
    Others: soluble in methanol, propylene glycol,  xylene  and  other organic solvents
Acid, Base Properties	
Highly Reactive with_
Compatible with
Shipped in  one to ten gallon cans and 55 gallon steel  drums
ICC Classification Poison B
 Comment*;   A white solid/ '
and wettable powders for spraying in aqueous solutions.
                                  •	  Coast Guard  Classification	
                              It is usually marketed In.tbe form of emulsive  concentrates
References  (1)   1492
            (2)   1618
                                          100

-------
                             PROFILE REPORT
                           Dinitro Cresol (162)

                              1.   GENERAL
                              Introduction

     Dinitro cresol (4,6-dinitro-o-cresol, DNOC) belongs to the class of
dinitrophenol compounds with a wide range of biocidal action and are useful
as insecticides, acaricides, herbicides, and fungicides.  Potassium dinitro-
o-cresylate, marketed in Germany in 1892, was the first synthetic organic
insecticide.  The compounds in use today are all derivatives of 4,6-dinitro-
2-alkylphenols and their salts or esters.

     Current production of DNOC is only at the rate of 20,000 to 30,000
Ib/year,     and indications are that it is being displaced more and more
by its homologs, and primarily by 2,4-dinitro-6-sec-butylphenol (DNBP,
dinoseb).   DNBP has the advantages of being  less explosive,
somewhat less toxic to man and domestic animals, and more effective in
controlling plant pests, plant diseases, and weeds.  DNBP surpasses DNOC
almost three times in insecticidal and herbicidal effect, and because of
the lower dosage, the cost of treatment per unit of area is substantially
lower.  Less of the DNBP compound remains on the plants, and the hazard in
using it is decreased.  Although this Profile Report is principally
concerned with DNOC, the waste management techniques discussed will also
be generally applicable to DNBP.

                              Manufacture

     DNOC is produced by the direct nitration of o-cresol with a nitrating
mixture at a low temperature, or in some cases, the o-cresol is first
sulfonated with concentrated sulfuric acid before the nitration.
     Blue Spruce Company, Basking Ridge, New Jersey, is the only U.S.
manufacturer of technical grade ONOC.
                                101

-------
                                   Uses
     DNOC is used in agriculture to control plant pests and diseases,  and
for the treatment of fruit trees before opening of the buds, either in the
form of emulsions with oils or more often in the form of aqueous solutions
of its salts.  In the control of weeds DNOC is used exclusively in the
form of aqueous solutions of the salts, and good results are obtained  in
                                                                1618
weed control in plantings of flax, grains, and some other crops.

                      Sources and Types of Pesticide Wastes

     The sources of pesticide wastes may include the following    :
(1) pesticide manufacturers; (2) pesticide formulators; (3) pesticide
wholesalers; (4) professional applicators; (5) cooperage facilities that
recondition drums; (6) agricultural users; (7) government facilities that
store, transport, and use pesticides; (8) urban and suburban home garden
users; (9) commercial and industrial processes including those from rug
and fabric treatment facilities manufacturing plants, hospitals, etc.

     In general, pesticide wastes can be classified as either diluted  or
concentrated wastes.  Diluted pesticide wastes include those generated
in the waste waters of the manufacturers, formulators, agricultural runoffs,
and possibly spent caustic solutions used to clean empty pesticide con-
tainers.  Concentrated pesticide wastes include any unused or contaminated
pesticides, pesticide materials left in containers after emptying, sludges
formed in treating waste water containing pesticides, sawdust or straw
used to soak up accidental pesticide spills.

                          Physical and Chemical Properties

     The physical and chemical properties of DNOC are described in the
attached worksheet.                                                   •
                                     102

-------
                              2.  TOXICOLOGY

     The dinitrophenols are biologically active because of their ability
to uncouple oxidative phosphorylation.  As a result insects poisoned by
DNOC undergo pronounced increases in the rate of respiration, which may
reach 3 to 10 times normal, and they die from metabolic exhaustion because
of their inability to utilize the energy provided by respiration and
glycosis for the conversion of ortho-phosphate to high energy phosphate
bonds.0509

     DNOC is also highly toxic to man and animals and a number of fatalities
have resulted from its use in medicine, industry, and agriculture.  It is an
accumulative poison in man and is excreted very slowly.  The symptoms of
poisoning include a feeling of warmth, excessive perspiration and thirst,
general debility and weariness, acute distress, collapse, and death followed
by almost instantaneous rigor.  Opacity of the lens of the eye has been
produced in laboratory animals following chronic poisoning by DNOC and has
occurred occasionally in humans taking this compound for reducing purposes
in the past.1617

     The acute oral and dermal LDcn values of DNOC to the rat are 30 and
                                 5 1277
600 mg/kg body weight respectively.       The chronic toxicity of DNOC has
also been extensively studied, and it was established that a DNOC concen-
tration of 100 ppm can be tolerated in the diet with no measurable
effects.0509'1617

     The American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH)
1971 recommended Threshold Limit Value (TLV) for DNOC in air is 0.2 mg/M3.0225

     The 48-hr Median Tolerance Limits (TLm) for DNOC established by
the Federal Water Pollution Control  Administration for various types of
fresh water organisms in micrograms per liter are    : P. Californica
                                                                     »
(stream invertebrate), 560; and Rainbow trout (fish), 210.  These data
are indicative of the hazards to aquatic life associated with the use
of DNOC.
                                 103

-------
                             3.  OTHER HAZARDS
     DNOC forms highly water soluble salts with caustic alkalies,  ammonia,
and organic amines, and these salts, when in the dry  state,  explode  readily
                         I c"l O
from shock or detonation.
                  4.  DEFINITION OF ADEQUATE WASTE MANAGEMENT

                       Handling Transportation,  and  Storage
     DNOC is highly toxic and is rapidly absorbed through the intact  skin
when used in the form of oil solutions.   Work with DNOC should be carried
out with the strict observance of necessary precautionary measures, and
the use of rubber gloves, goggles, a respirator, and other protective
clothing is advisable.  Special care should be exercised in handling  the
salts of DNOC because of their explosive nature.

     DNOC should be stored in cool, dry, well ventilated places and away
from any area where the fire hazard may be acute.  Outside or detached
storage is preferred.  Proper warning signs should be posted in storage
areas.1616

     DNOC is classified as a Class B poison by the Department of
Transportation and the rules governing its transportation are given  in
the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 49--Transportation, Parts
71-90.0278

     The National Agricultural Chemicals Association has established  a
Pesticide Safety Team Network with Area Coordinators throughout the
country to provide nationwide 24-hr service.  The network became
operational on March 9, 1970 (with a central telephone number
[513] 916-4300) and should be consulted in all cases of accidents,
spills, leakage, fires, and other types of disasters involving DNOC.

-------
                              Disposal/Reuse

       Contaminated or degraded DNOC could not be practically considered
  for reprocessing.  The safe disposal  of the pesticide is defined in terms
  of the recommended provisional limits in the atmosphere and potable
  water source and/or marine habitat.   The recommended provisional limits
  are as follows:

  Contaminant and                                                Basis for
   Environment              Provisional Limits                 Recommendation
  DNOC in air                   0.002 mg/M3                      0.01 TLV
  DNOC in water and soil      0.01 ppm(mg/l)                  Stokinger and
                                                              Woodward method.

               5.  EVALUATION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES

                          Dilute  Pesticide Wastes

     Option No.l  - Adsorption with Granular Activated-Carbon  Beds. Treatment
of waste water containing DNOC with activated-carbon columns has been
practiced by Fisons Pest Control  Ltd., in England since 1955s1035'1631
where over 99 percent removal of  the pesticide is obtained.  There are
six adsorption towers, each 7 ft  6 in. in diameter and 25 ft high overall,
capable of containing 7 to 10 tons of activated carbon.  The activated
carbon employed is normally 10 to 20 B.S.S. mesh and the flow rate through
the towers normally 3S000 gal/hr, and the spent carbon is reactivated in
a conventional rotary furnace.  The nominal concentrations of DNOC in the
plant effluent are 60 to 190 ppm before treatment and 0.1 to 0.6 ppm after
treatment.  The treated effluent is diluted with river water before
additional treatment in trickling filters and an aeration system followed
by discharge to river.  No further removal of DNOC from the waste water is
observed in the biological treatment stages, but the results of governmental
biological surveys indicated no effects of the discharge on  the river thus
                                 105

-------
indicating the adequacy of the activated-carbon treatment by itself.
Because of the proven capability and the fact that it is a well established
chemical engineering unit operating, adsorption with granual activated-
carbon beds should be considered as one of the most satisfactory methods
for treating dilute DNOC wastes.

      Option No.2 - Adsorption with Powdered Activated Carbon.  Although the
 use of powdered activated carbon to remove DNOC from water has not been
 investigated directly,  the effectiveness of DNOC adsorption with  granular
 activated-carbon beds and the results of the related studies on powdered
 activated carbon adsorption of other pesticides conducted by Robeck et al,
 0441Sigworth,1635 and Whitehouse     indicate that the addition of powdered
 activated carbon to a liquid solution followed by stirring and filtration
 is an adequate method for treating dilute DNOC wastes.

      Option No.3 - Biological Degradation.  Southern Dyestuff Company,
 Charlotte, North Carolina, has demonstrated on the pilot plant scale
 that waste waters containing nitrophenols could be successfully treated
                              1450
 in an activated sludge unit,      and is presently in the process of
 installing a complete waste treatment facility including an activated
 sludge unit, an aeration system, and a chlorination stage to handle their
 manufacturing waste streams.      In the opinion of Southern Dyestuff,
 waste waters containing DNOC could also be adequately treated by the same
 system.1805

      Option No.4 - Eli Lilly Process.  R.H.L. Howe of Eli Lilly and Company
 has developed a patented process for removing nitrophenols and nitroanilines
 from waste waters.     The process consists of acidifying the waste stream
 to a pH of less than about three, adding an absorbent material to take up
 the colored components, adding a metallic oxide or hydroxide to adjust the
 pH to more than about five and also to form a precipitate, and separating
 the mixture into an effluent and a sludge or foam (scum).  The resulted
 effluent is free of nitrophenols and nitroanilines and can then be treated
                                                1OQO  1974
 by conventional techniques.  According to Howe,    s      the process is
 also applicable to the treatment of waste waters containing 100 ppm to a

-------
few weight percent DNOC, and the treated effluent would be non-toxic to
fish life and safe to any receiving sewer or water course.

     Option No.5 - Light Catalyzed Chlorine Oxidation.  The effect of ultraviolet
radiation on the rate and extent of chlorine oxidation of 2,4-dinitrophenol
                                               0887 1804
has been briefly investigated by Meiners et al.    '     The results with
initially 38 ppm 2,4-dinitrophenol (15 ppm total organic carbon) indicated
the rapid degradation of the compound (practically 100 percent elimination
in 8 min) and the fairly rapid decrease in the total organic carbon (53
percent in 10 min), and demonstrated the value of the process as a near
future treatment method for dilute DNOC wastes.

                         Concentrated Pesticide Wastes

     Option No.l - Incineration.  The complete and controlled high temperature
oxidation of DNOC in air or oxygen with adequate scrubbing and ash disposal
facilities offers the greatest immediate potential for the safe disposal
of the pesticide.  The research on incineration of pesticides conducted by
Kennedy et al at Mississippi State University has led to the conclusion
that DNBP approached complete combustion at temperatures as low as 600 C
and identified carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and ammonia as the
volatile products from burning of the DNBP formulation at 900 C.     '
Because of the similarity in chemical structure of DNBP and DNOC,
temperatures not far above 600 C should also be sufficient to degrade DNOC
and the same combustion products should be obtained.  It is expected that
either a rotary kiln or liquid combustor, depending on the waste form, fol-
lowed by secondary combustion and scrubbing would be the best current and
near future method for the disposal of concentrated DNOC wastes.  Again,
primary combustion should be carried out at a minimum of 1S500 F for at
least 0.5 second with secondary combustion at a minimum temperature of
2,200 F for at least 1.0 second.
      Option  No.2  - Chemical  Degradation.   The  use of  chemical  reagents  to
decompose concentrated  pesticide wastes  to  less  toxic forms has  also
been  investigated by Kennedy et al.     '     The Mississippi  State work showed
that:  (1) DNBP was altered structurally  by  sodium hydroxide but  the spectrum

-------
 produced was  not resolved;  (2)  80  percent  of  the  DNBP were decomposed when
treated with the sodium biphenyl reagent prepared by heating a mixture
of metallic sodium, anhydrous toluene, and the dimethyl  ether of ethylene
glycol-,  (3) 93.8 percent DNBP degradation were obtained when the pesticide
was treated with liquid ammonia and metallic sodium.  Although liquid ammonia
and metallic sodium would probably also completely decompose DNOCS the reagent
is dangerous to use and the toxicity of the degradation  products are not
known.  Based on the results to date, chemical degradation could not be
recommended as a method for the disposal of concentrated DNOC wastes.

      Option No.3  - Sanitary Landfill.  Although data is not available on the
persistence of DNOC in soil, the pesticide readily forms water soluble
ammonium, sodium, potassium, and calcium salts and poses the problem of
potential ground and surface water pollution.  Sanitary landfill should
therefore be considered only for the disposal of small quantities of DNOC
wastes,  and only at approved sites that are acceptable from a geologic and
ground water hydrology standpoint.

      Option No.4  - Deep Well.   Although DNOC  itself is only sparingly soluble
in water, the potential contamination of ground water by the water soluble
ammonium, potassium, sodium, and calcium salts of DNOC makes deep well,
at best,  a questionable method  for the disposal of DNOC.  Deep well disposal
is not recommended by the National Working Group on Pesticides,    and
should be considered only under special situations where hazards would be
nonexistent.

    The  disposal  of DNOC wastes in open pits,  lagoons, unapproved landfill
sites, and by onsite burnings or deep-sea  burial  are not recommended
practices because of the obvious contributions to air and water  pollution.

    To summarize, the adequate  methods  for treating dilute DNOC  wastes  are
either adsorption with granular activated-carbon  beds or adsorption  with
 powdered activated carbon.  The only adequate method  for the  disposal  of
 concentrated  DNOC wastes  is incineration.  Based  on the information  to
date, activated  sludge treatment,  the Eli  Lilly process, and  light  catalyzed
 chlorine oxidation could  all  be considered only  as  possible  near future
methods  for  treating dilute DNOC wastes.

-------
              6.  APPLICABILITY TO NATIONAL DISPOSAL SITES

     DNOC and its homologs, because of their relatively high'toxicity and
widespread use and distribution as a pesticide in the farming communities,
are candidate waste stream constituents for National Disposal Site
treatment.  The recommended unit operation for disposal of dilute
dinitrophenol waste is adsorption with activated carbon in either
powdered or granular form while the only operation judged adequate
for concentrated dinitrophenol waste disposal is controlled incineration.

     It should be noted that both the activated carbon and incineration
processes are generally applicable to the disposal of most pesticides.
They are therefore expected to be utilized at National Disposal Sites
which handle pesticides and are located near agricultural centers and
pesticide manufacturers.
                               109

-------
                            7.  REFERENCES

            0
0062. Kennedy, M. V., B. J. Stojanovic, and F. L. Shuman9  Jr.  Chemical
        and thermal methods for disposal of pesticides.   Residue Reviews,
        29: 89-104, 1969.

0063. Kennedy, M. V.9 B. J. Stojanovic, and F. L. Shuman, Jr.  Chemical
        and thermal aspects of pesticide control.  Journal of Environmental
        Quality, 1 (1): 63-65, Jan. 1972.

0025. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists.  Threshold
        limit values for 1971. Occupational Hazards, p.  35-40, Aug.  1971.

0278. Code of Federal Regulations.  Title 49—transporation, parts 71  to 90.
        (Revised as of January 13 1967).  Washington, U.S. Government
        Printing Office, 1967. 794 p.

0441. Robeck, G. G., K. A. Dostal, J. M. Cohen, J. F. Kreissl.   Effectiveness
        of water treatment processes in pesticide removal.  Journal of
        American Water Works Associations, 57: 181-199, Feb. T9&T.~*~

0445. Whitehouse, J. D.s A Study of the removal of pesticides from water.
        Research Report No. 8, Water Resources Institute, University of
        Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, 1967.  175 p.

0448. The Working Group on Pesticides.  Ground disposal  of pesticides:  the
        problem and criteria for guidelines.  Washington, U.S.  Government
        Printing Office, 1970. 55 p.

0509. Metcalf, R. L.  The Chemistry and biology of pesticides,  In pesticides
        in the environment.  V. 1 Part 1. Ed. by E. White-Stevens.  New
        York, Marcel Dekker, Inc., 1971. p. 1-144.

0534. Jones, H. R.  Environmental control in the organic and petrochemical
        industries.  Park Ridge, New Jersey, Noyes Data Corporation, 1971.
        257 p.

0536. Water quality criteria.  Report of the National Technical Advisory
        Committee to the Secretary of the Interior.  April 1, 1968.
        Washington, Federal Water Pollution Control Administration. 234 p.

0620. The Working Group on Pesticides.  Information available on disposal
        of surplus pesticides, empty containers and emergency situations.
        Washington, U.S. Government Printing Office, 1970. 52 p.

0621. The Working Group on Pesticides.  Summary of interim guidelines for
        disposal of surplus or waste pesticides and pesticide containers.
        Washington, U.S. Government Printing Office, 1970. 25 p.

-------
                           REFERENCES - CONTINUED

0887. Meiners, A. F., E. A. Lawler, M.  E. Whitehead, and J.  I.  Morrison.
        An investigation of light-catalyzed chlorine oxidation for
        treatment of waste water.   Robert A.  Taft Water Research Center
        Report No. TWRC-3.  Washington, U.S.  Government Printing Office.
        1968. 128 p.

1035. Lambden, A. E., and D. H. Sharp.   Treatment of effluents  from the
        manufacture of weedkillers and pesticides.  Manufacturing Chemist.
        31: 198-201, May 1960.

1277. Bailey, J. B., and J. E. Swift.  Pesticide information and safety
        manual.  Berkeley, California,  University of California, Agricultural
        Extension Service, 1968. 147 p.

1433. Kirk-Othmer encyclopedia of chemical technology,  2d ed.  v 11.  New
        York, Interscience Publishers,  1966.  899 p.

1450. Personal Communication.   F.  Huber, Southern Dyestuff Company to
        W. Kendrick, TRW Systems,  Apr.  26, 1972.  Treatment  of  aqueous
        waste streams containing dinitrophenol.

1616. National Agricultural Chemicals Association.  Safety manual  for
        handling and warehousing Class  B poison  pesticides.   Washington,
        1969. 13 p.

1617. Metcalf, R. L. Organic insecticides—their chemistry and  mode  of
        action.  New York, Interscience Publishers Inc., 1955.  392 p.

1618. Melnikov, W. N.  Chemistry of the  pesticides.  New York,  Springer
        Verlag, 1971.  480 p.

1631. Sharp, D. H.  The disposal of waste materials  in  the pesticide
        industry.  Jj^ Disposal of industrial  waste materials:  paper  to
        be read at the Conference at Sheffield University.  17th-19th
        April, 1956.  London,  England,  Society of Chemical Industry,
        1956. p. 9-15.

1635. Sigworth, E. A.  Identification and removal of  herbicides  and
        pesticides.  Journal of American Water Work  Association, 57
        (8): 1016-1022. Aug. 1965.

1802. Personal communication.   R.  Howe, Eli Lilly and Company to C.  C.  Shih,
        TRW Systems, June 5, 1972.   Dinitrocresol removal  from  water.

1804. Personal communication.   A.  Meiners, Midwest Research  Institute to
        C. C. Shih, TRW Systems, June 5, 1972.   Light-catalyzed chlorine
        oxidation of dinitrophenols.

1805. Personal communication.   F.  Huber, Southern Dyestuff Company to
        C. C. Shih, TRW Systems, June 5, 1972.   Dinitrocresol waste
        treatment.
                                 ill

-------
                       REFERENCES - CONTINUED

1964.  Personal communication. A. Livingston, Blue Spruce Company to
        C. C. Shih, TRW Systems,, June 12, 1972.  Dinitro cresol manufacture.

1974.  Personal communication.  R. Howe, Eli Lilly and Company to C. C. Shih,
        TRW Systems, June 8, 1972.  Dinitrocresol and nitrophenol waste
        treatment.

-------
                                   HAZARDOUS WASTES PROPERTIES
                                           WORKSHEET
 H. M. Name    Omitro Cresol (162)

 IUC Name  2-4-dinitro-6-methvlphenol
 Coimnon Names  4.6-dinitro-O-cresol, PNC. DNOC
                                                               Structural Formula
 Molecular Wt.   198.1
                                     Melting Pt.    86.4C
                                                        (2)
                                                 Boiling Pt..
 Density (Condensed)
                                @
                          Density (gas)
 Vapor Pressure (recommended 55 C and 20 0
   5.2 X 10~5mm<8  25 C
                     (2)
 Flash Point
                                   Auto1gn1t1on Temp._
 Flaranabllity Limits in Air (wt %)    Lower_
 Explosive Limits in Air (wt.  %)      Lower
                                                             Upper_
                                                             Upper_
Solubility
	             (?}
    Cold Mater 0.0128%u;
     Others:
          	  Hot Water_
soluble in acetone and benzene
                                                                       Ethanol   4.3* at  15  C
                                                                                            (3)
 Acid, Base Properties  DNOC is a pseudo acid and readily forms water soluble sodium,
   potassium, calcium and ammonium saltsO)
 Highly Reactive with
 Compatible with_
 Shipped in_
 ICC Classification
                            Poison B
                              Coast Guard Classification
  Comments    DNOC  is a yellow  crystalline substance in the pure <:tatp.
C
 References  (1)   509
             (2}  1618
             (2>  1433
             (3)
                                        113

-------
                            PROFILE REPORT

    Cadmium Cyanide (84), Calcium Cyanide (91).  Copper Cyanides  (120).
    Cuprous Cyanide (128), Cyanide (129), Lead Cyanide (239),  Nickel
    Cyanide (295). Potassium Cyanide (344).  Silver Cyanide (370).
    Sodium Cyanide (387). and Zinc Cyanide (457)

                             1.   GENERAL

     The cyanides listed above are included  in a combined Profile  Report
because they respond in similar fashion to disposal  processes  due  to  the
cyanide group present in each of the compounds.

     Hydrocyanic acid (215), hydrogen cyanide (218), and mercuric  cyanide
(254) are not included in this combined Profile Report, but are  included
in separate reports because of the special disposal  problems these
compounds present.

     The majority of cyanide-containing waste streams are discharged
from the electroplating industry and include liquid, slurry, sludge,  and
solid forms depending upon the degree of concentration.  Rinse waters
from copper electroplatings for examples may be concentrated by  passing
through evaporators.  In this case, the waste may be a crystalline solid
containing 15 percent by weight copper in copper cyanide and sodium
cyanide salts (40 percent solids by weight)  with traces of other metals.
A typical concentrated liquid waste from copper electroplating rinse
waters may contain 2 percent copper cyanide, 6 percent sodium  cyanide„
sodium sulfonate, hydrocarbons and zinc phosphate in 83 percent  water.

     A characteristic concentrated liquid waste stream containing  cyanide
wastes from zinc electroplating may be 0»8 percent cyanide 1n  1  percent sodium
hydroxide containing 3(300 ppm of zinc and 165 ppm nickel.  A characteristic
                                115

-------
 sludge may contain 20 percent sodium ferrocyanide with 2 percent zinc and
 insolubles, and 50 percent water.

      It  is estimated that there are 21 ,323 9 600 Ib of cyanide wastes and
 2,106,000 Ib of copper wastes generated in the electroplating industry
 each  year.  The geographic distribution of these wastes is shown in
 Volume 14S the volume titled, "Waste Forms and Quantities."

                             Calcium Cyanide

      Pure calcium cyanide is known only in the laboratory.  A crude
 cyanide  containing 48 to 50 percent cyanide expressed as sodium cyanide
 is the only important calcium cyanide of commerce at the present time.
 It is sold in the form of black or gray flakes, powder, or cast blocks
 and is known as black cyanide or under trade names such as Aero Brand
 cyanide, Cyanogas, and Aerocase 28.  Physical/chemical properties are
 summarized in the attached worksheet,

     Calcium cyanide is prepared by a process in which calcium cyanamide
is caused to react with the carbon present in crude calcium cyanamide in
the presence of salt:
                   CaCN2 + C        Ca(CN)2

The temperature for the reactions i ,OOOC, is attained through the use of
an electric furnace.  The melt is quick-cooled on a flaking wheel, which
rapidly chills the product to prevent reversion to cyanamide.  This product
is sold in the form of a dark gray flake or is melted and cast into molds
for sale as bricks.

     The more important uses for black cyanide are as follows:
     (1)  Cyanidation of Gold and Silver from Ores - Metallic gold and silver
         dissolve  in cyanide solutions in the presence of oxygen to form

-------
         the corresponding cyano complexes.   The dissolved gold and silver
         are reprecipitated with zinc dust as a sludge which is refined
         to obtain pure gold, silver and the other metals present.   The
         zinc added is converted to zinc cyanide which in an alkaline
                                                             1158
         solution, complexes  as per the following reaction:
             2 Zn (CN)2 + 4 OH" + [Zn(CN)4)]2  + [Zn(OH)4]2

    (2)  Depressor in Froth Flotation - Black cyanide in solution has the
         property of rendering certain minerals less amenable to flotation
         (it depresses zinc in lead-zinc ores, zinc and iron in complex
                                                       1 -i CQ
         lead-zinc-iron ores, and iron in copper ores).
    (3)  Fumigation of Citrus Groves„ Greenhouses, etc.
    (4)  Commercial Production of Hydrogen Cyanide - Black cyanide  is
         acidified and the evolved hydrogen cyanide-water mixture is
         concentrated by distillation.
    (5)  Manufacture of Ferrocyanides.
    (6)  Case Hardening of Steels - In case hardening (carburizing), a
         high carbon surface layer is imported to a low carbon  steel by
         heating up to 1,600 F in a molten bath containing Ca(CN^» NaCl,
         CaO, and carbon.1146
                             Cadmium Cyanide

     Cadmium cyanide crystallizes as a colorless rhombic crystal.   It may
be prepared in the laboratory by treating cadmium sulfate  with  an alkali
metal cyanide or by dissolving cadmium hydroxide in aqueous hydrocyanic
acid.  Its main use is in the form of a complex in electroplating  with
cadmium for rust protection.  Because of high losses during purification,
cadmium cyanide is not prepared commercially in dry form, but usually as a
solution of sodium cyanocadmate, Na~[Cd(CN)9].  This is formed by  dissolv-
                                             1433
ing cadmium oxide in sodium cyanide solution.<     Physical/chemical
properties are summarized in the attached worksheet.
                                 117

-------
                            Copper Cyanides

     Copper forms two cyanides„ cupric cyanide,  CufCN)^,  and  cuprous
cyanide, CuCN.  Cupric cyanide is a yellow powder which is  unstable and
rapidly decomposes at ordinary temperatures giving off cyanogen and
forming 2 CuCN • Cu(CN).. 5 H20.  Only the more  stable cuprous  compound  is
an item of commerce9 and therefore, only this compound will be  discussed
in this Profile Report.
     When pure, cuprous cyanide is a white insoluble compound.   Its
principal uses are in electroplating, medicines  removal of  oxygen  from
molten metals (particularly copper), insecticides, underwater  paint, and
organic nitrile separation.  In solutions for electroplating  of copper,
cuprous cyanide is placed in solution by formation of complex ions with
excess soluble cyanide.
                                                                     1433
     There are several methods for the preparation of cuprous cyanide.
In one method cupric sulfate solution is reacted simultaneously with
aqueous solutions of sodium hydroxide and sodium hydrogen sulfite  to
reduce the cupric ions.  A sodium cyanide solution is then  added and  the
cuprous cyanide precipitated, filtered, washed and air dried.  Another
preparation method used today is to treat alkali cyanide solution  with
cuprous chloride.  Commercial preparation of cuprous chloride is accom-
plished by reducing cupric chloride with scrap copper in the  presence of hot
sodium chloride brine.
     Chemical/physical properties are summarized in the attached worksheet.

                               Lead Cyanide

     Lead cyanide is a white crystalline material that is slightly soluble
in aqueous solutions of ammonium salts, ammonium hydroxide, hot nitric
acid, and alkali cyanides.   It has  been used to a small extent as  an insec-
ticide and  in electroplating for producing a smutty effect in green gold
deposits.  It is not generally available commercially, but is best prepared
for use by slowly addingB with stirring, a cold solution of sodium cyanide

-------
and sodium hydroxide to lead acetate dissolved in cold water.   The precipi-
tated lead cyanide is allowed to settle, washed and drieds if to be stored.
Physical/chemical properties are summarized in the attached worksheet.

                              Nickel Cyanide

     Nickel cyanide is a light green powder that is present, either as the
tetrahydrate, Ni(CN)3 • 4 1^0, or as 2 Ni(CN)2 • 7 H20.  It is hydroscopic
but at 200 C becomes anhydrous.  It reacts with alkali and alkaline earth
cyanides to form soluble orange or yellow tetracyanonickelates.  Nickel
cyanide is usually prepared by the action of an alkali metal  cyanide on  a
solution of a nickel salt.
     Nickel cyanide is not used in electrodeposition of the metal, because
nickel cannot be deposited from an aqueous solution of the pure alkali
nickel cyanide complex.  Nickel cyanide is added to plating baths for the
electroplating of other metals such as gold or silver to make harder
deposits, or in zinc-plating baths to enhance the brightness.   It also is
used in small quantities as an anticorrosion agent.      It reacts with
alkali metal and alkaline earth metal  cyanides to form nickelocyanides.

     Physical/chemical properties are summarized in the attached worksheet.

                             Potassium Cyanide

     Potassium cyanide is a white, crystalline,, deliquescent solid that is
less subject to hydrolysis in aqueous solution than is sodium cyanide.
Potassium cyanide is made either by neutralization of potassium hydroxide
with hydrogen cyanide or by the Beilby process which utilizes the molten
carbonate.  The overall reaction is as follows:
                                            A
                         K2 C03 + 4C + 2NH3 -f 2KCN + SCO + 3H20
     Potassium cyanide is often used in preference to sodium cyanide for
electroplating silver and copper.  The reasons for this preference are:
     (1) the potassium bath can be operated over a wide current-density
        range;        '         ;''      '  ''
                                  119

-------
    (2) a lower metal content is required for a comparable  current-
        density range and electrodeposit appearance;
    (3) it has a greater tolerance to organic contaminants; and
    (4) it permits higher carbonate concentrations.   Potassium
        cyanide also finds some use in mixtures with  sodium cyanide  for
        nitriding steel.1146
     Physical/chemical properties for potassium cyanide are summarized in
the attached worksheet.

                              Silver  Cyanide
     Silver cyanide, AgCN or Ag  (CN) , is a white odorless powder that
                               X     X
has a complex structure.  Silver cyanide reacts with solutions of soluble
metal cyanides to form a very slightly dissociated complex union [Ag(CN)2].
This complex is formed in the cyanidation of silver ores and in electro-
plating.  The complex is decomposed by alkaline sulfides with precipitation
of silver sulfide and by reaction with mineral acids with precipitation
                                                     11 co
of silver cyanide and liberation of hydrogen cyanide.
     Silver cyanide is usually manufactured by adding an alkali metal
cyanide to a solution of silver nitrate according to the following
reaction:
                       Ag N03 + Na CN -> Ag CN 4- + Na N03
The principle use of silver cyanide is in electroplating.
     The physical/chemical properties for silver cyanide are summarized in
the attached worksheet.

                             Sodium Cyanide

     Sodium cyanide is a hardB white crystalline solid.  At high tempera-
tures, it does not ignite in contact with air? this permits its use in high
temperature metal treatment.  Its applications include metal treatment,
electroplating baths and synthesis of organic intermediates.  Its use in

                                   120

-------
extraction of  low-grade gold, silver and molybdenum ores account for only
a small part of the total use.

     Most sodium cyanide is manufactured either by the neutralization of
hydrogen cyanide with sodium hydroxide or by the Castner Process described
as follows:

      1)   Sodamide  is  formed  from sodium and ammonia:
                       2NH3  + 2Na -»• 2Na NH£ + H2
      2)   Sodamide  reacts with carbon  at 350=400 C  to form sodium cyanamide:
                       2 Na  NH2 + C -»• Na£ CN2 + 2H£
      3)   At  temperatures of  about 700 Cs the sodium cyanamide reacts with
 further quantities of carbon to form  molten cyanide:
                       Na2 CN2 + C  ->  2Na CN 1433
      Physical/chemical properties for sodium cyanide are summarized in the
 attached  worksheet.

                               Zinc Cyanide

      Zinc  cyanide  is  a white solid.   It is very stable when dry and can be
 heated in  the  absence of air to 1000  C without decomposition.  In the
 presence  of  air it decomposes at 800  C.  It dissolves easily in solutions
 of soluble cyanides to form  complexes such as:
                       K2[Zn(CN)4]  and Na2 [Zn(CN)4] • 3H20
 Zinc  cyanide is prepared by  a number  of processes.  One involves its prep-
 aration from zinc  oxideB sulfuric acid9 and sodium cyanide according to
 the following  equations:
                       ZnO + H2 S04+  Zn S04 + HgO
                       Zn S04 + 2NaCN+ Zn(CN)2+ + Na2 S04
 It may also  be prepared by treating a solution of  zinc acetate with hydro-
 gen cyanide.   As a waste considerable zinc cyanides as Na9[Zn(CN)A]9 is
                                                             1433
 formed in  gold and silver ore processing with sodium cyanide.

-------
     The principal uses for zine cyanide are in electroplating, and
occasionally in medicine. Its physical/chemical properties are summarized
in the attached worksheet.

                            2.  TOXICOLOGY

     Volatile cyanides resemble hydrocyanic acid physiologically, inhibiting
tissue oxidation and causing death through asphyxiation.  The non-volatile
cyanide salts are of high toxicity systemically, if they are ingested. Care
should be taken to prevent the formation of hydrocyanic acid.  Daily expo-
sure to cyanide solutions may cause a "cyanide" rash characterized by
itching, and by muscular, papular, and vesicular eruptions.  Exposure to
small amounts of cyanide compounds over long periods of time may cause loss
of appetite, headache, weakness, nausea, dizziness and symptoms of the
upper respiratory track and eyes.  The Threshold Limit Value (TLV) (ACGIH)
recommended is 5 milligrams per cubic meter of air.

     The toxicity of the various metal ions that combine with the cyanide
ion has been extensively discussed in the report "Water Quality Criteria".
Even if the cyanide ion concentration is reduced to near zero, the concen-
tration of the metal ions remaining must be considered.  Therefore, con-
centration limits have been established for the metallic ions in public
water supplies.  The permissible and desirable limits for cyanide and
metal ions are summarized below.
                              Permissible               Desirable
        Constituent          Criteria, mg/1           Criteria, mg/1
         Cadmium                 0.01                 Absent
         Copper                  1.0                  Virtually absent
         Lead                    0.05                 Absent
         Silver                  0.05                 Absent
         Zinc                    5                    Virtually absent
         Cyanide                 0.20                 Absent

-------
                           Aquatic Toxicity

     A discussion not only of cyanide ion toxicity but of the toxicity
toward aquatic life of all the metal ions covered as cyanides in this
Profile Report is also included in the report "Water Quality Criteria".
The toxicity of cyanides towards aquatic Tife increases rapidly with a
rise in temperature.  Fish can recover from short exposure to concentrations
of less than 1.0 mg/1 of cyanide ion if removed to water free of cyanides.
Fish appear to be able to convert cyanide to thiocyanate, an ion that is
not inhibitory to their respiratory enzymes.  The complex cyanides formed
by the action of cyanide with zinc or cadmium salts are much more toxic  than
sodium cyanide.  However, the reaction between cyanide and nickel produces
a cyanide complex less toxic than sodium cyanide at high pH levels.

                            3.  OTHER HAZARDS

     Cyanides evolve hydrocyanic acid rather easily when acidified.   HCN
is a flammable gas and is highly toxic.  Carbon dioxide from the air is
sufficiently acid to liberate hydrocyanic acid from cyanide solutions.

                4.  DEFINITION OF ADEQUATE WASTE MANAGEMENT

     Adequate procedures for safe handling and storage of cyanides as
                                                                   1562
concentrated or dilute solutions are described in detail by Graham.
His book provides recommended procedures for building design, equipment
design, ventilation, employee safety, design of storage containers,  and
material specifications.  The U. S. Department of Transportation (DOT)
classification and shipping regulations for the various cyanides covered
by this Profile Report are summarized below:
Compound           :            Shipping Regulations
Cadmium Cyanide  ;    Cadmium cyanide is not normally prepared commercially
                     iii the dry form, but usually as a solution of sodium
                     cyanocadmates by dissolving cadmium oxide in sodium
             •••"••• cyanide solutions.  See "Sodium Cyanide".

-------
 Compound

 Calcium Cyanide
 Cuprous Cyanide
 Lead Cyanide



 Nickel Cyanide


 Potassium Cyanide


 Silver Cyanide
 Sodium Cyanide
 Zinc Cyanide
        Shipping Regulations

Calcium cyanide is shipped in steel  drums as a
Class B poison.  It must be protected from moisture
because it decomposes slowly.  Also, it usually
contains calcium carbide which will  liberate
acetylene upon contact with moisture.

Cuprous cyanide is usually packed in fiber drums in
wooden kegs.  It is a toxic item and should carry
warning labels as recommended by the Manufacturing
Chemists  Association.  It may be shipped by freight
express or motor truck but is not mail able.

Lead cyanide is not usually manufactured on a large
scale.  It is shipped under the same regulations as
cuprous cyanide.

Nickel cyanide is shipped as a Poison B under a
poison.label.

Potassium cyanide is shipped as a Poison B under a
poison label.

Silver cyanide is packed in cardboard tubes or in
fiber containers.  It may be shipped by express but
is not mailable.  It is a restricted item and must
carry a warning label similar to that recommended
by the Manufacturing Chemists  Association.

Sodium cyanide is shipped in iron drums and smaller
containers packed in drums.  Container cars can also
be used.  Drums and packages are shipped under a
poison B label.  Carload shipments carry a placard
labeled "Dangerous".

Zinc cyanide is shipped under the same regulations
as cuprous cyanide.
     A definition of acceptable criteria for disposal of cyanide salts must
also take into account acceptable criteria for not only the release of
cyanide ion but also the release of the associated metallic constituents
into streams or sewage works.  Most industrial states have laws regulating
the discharge of waste streams from metal processing works and plating
operations.  Laws are being enacted that reduce the quantities of waste
that may be discharged, but in many cases there are not definite standards
for acceptable wastes.  The severity of the waste nuisance varies with:

-------
      0)  Volume and toxicity of wastes produced  (as metal ions
          free of cyanide).
      (2)  Nature of receiving waters,
      (3)  Minimum flow of the natural streams, or
      (4)  The process used in the sewage plant.

           l 'ifi?
      Graham      includes information (Table 1) which compares the
concentration of constituents in typical plating rinse wastes with
standards set by some states.  Future laws will lower the range of
permissible concentrations.
     The safe disposal of the metal cyanides is defined in terms of the
recommended provisional limits for the residual metal cyanides and the
disposal process product soluble metal ions in the atmosphere., in potable
water sources, and in marine habitats.  These recommended provisional
limits are as follows:
Contaminant in
     Air	
Cadmium cyanide
Calciura cyanide
Copper cyanide
Lead cyanide
Nickel cyanide
Potassium cyanide
Silver cyanide
Sodium cyanide
Zinc cyanide
Contaminant in
Water and Soil
Cadmium cyanide
Calcium cyanide
Copper cyanide
Lead cyanide
Nickel cyanide
Potassium cyanide
Silver cyanide
Sodium cyanide
Zinc cyanide
Provisional Limit
0.002 mg/fT as Cd
0.05 mg/M3 as CN
0.01 mg/M3 as Cu
0.0015 mg/M3 as Pb
0.01 mg/M3 as Ni
0.05 mg/M3 as CN
0.0001 mg/M3 as Ag
0.05 mg/M3 as CN
0.05 mg/M3 as CN
Provisional Limit
0.01 mg/1 as .CN
0.01 mg/1 as CN
0.01 mg/1 as CN
0.01 mg/1 as CN
0.01 mg/1 as CN
0.01 mg/1 as CN
0.01 mg/1 as CN
0.01 mg/1 as CN
0.01 mg/1 as CN
Basis for Recommendation

      0.01 TLV
      0.01 TLV
      0.01 TLV
      0.01 TLV
      0.01 TLV
      0.01 TLV
      0.01 TLV
      0.01 TLV
      0.01 TLV
Basis for Recommendation

Drinking Water Standard
Drinking Water Standard
Drinking Water Standard
Drinking Water Standard
Drinking Water Standard
Drinking Water Standard
Drinking Water Standard
Drinking Water Standard
Drinking Water Standard
                              125

-------
                              TABLE  1
            CONCENTRATION OF CONSTITUENTS  OF TYPICAL  DILUTE PLATING
                RINSE WASTES COMPARED  WITH SOME  STATE STANDARDS1562


        Plating Wastes            Range  of Permissible Concentration,ppm
Constituent  Concentration, ppm   Effluent to              Influent* to
              (Avg)       (Max)   Streams	In  Streams  Sewage Works
CN
Cu
Zn
Cd
Ni
Pb
PH
30
20
15
15
25
0
Varies
500 None to 0.5
100 1
50
50
200
30
Varies 6.5-9.5
None to 0.2
0.4
0.3 - 1.5
0.3
-
0.35
6.3 - 9
2
1 • * 3
-
-
1-3
0.1
5 - 6.5
* Influent after dilution and mixing with all  other wastes.
                               126

-------
                 5.   EVALUATION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT  PRACTICES

     Much of the information in the literature on the volume and composition
of electroplating, metal treating, metal finishing wastes, and mining wastes
refers to the large  or intermediate-size plants that do routine operations.
There are wide variations in both volume and composition from plant to
plant.  This is because the waste streams from these plants are the product
of local plant conditions and practices such as dragout, rinsing techniques,
recovery methods employed, and the admixture of other waste streams.  There
is little or no information on the volume and composition of wastes encoun-
                                                           078"?
tered in the smaller plating shops that do general plating."'00

              Recovery and Conservation of Water and Cyanide

     Any expedient that prevents the loss of chemicals or removes them from
the waste stream in  reusable  or resalable form may be considered as a
recovery operation.  In recovery processes the metal ion can be recovered
as well as sodium cyanide.  In some localities water is valuable and its
recovery may be economically attractive.

     Evaporation Methods.  The evaporation of collected plating rinses for
return to plating baths is an attractive process.  Cyanide wastes have been
concentrated (by distillation of H20) to recover the metal  and cyanide
values for reuse in the plating process. The distillate generated is used
as rinse water.   In many cases the recovery of the cyanides by this tech-
nique is economically feasible when the values of the cyanides and water
               1 *ifi?
are considered.       When feasible, this method is recommended because
resources are conserved and landfill  is not required for disposal.
     Ion-Exchange Methods.  Ion exchange has been successfully applied to
mixed wastes (chromium and cyanides) by the use of a duel bed process. In
this process the waste stream is first passed through a cationic exchanger
to absorb metals, help break up complex metal cyanides and generate free
hydrogen cyanide, and then through an anionic exchanger to absorb the
                           0783
liberated hydrogen cyanide.       The concentration of cyanide in the waste
                                    127

-------
 stream must be below about 5 percent.   Regeneration—the removal  of
 cyanides and metals from the resins--must be done periodically.   The
 is accomplished by passing sulfuric acid and/or sodium hydroxide through
 the resins to redissolve the cyanides and metals.  Regenerated solutions
 are generally concentrated but still  toxic.   If they are to be discharged,
 they require chemical treatment, but because they are concentrated treat-
 ment may be carried out batchwise in small tanks.  In many cases recovery
 of the metals as cyanide is economically feasible.

      Chemical Recovery Methods.   Chemical recovery methods are not widely
 used, except for precious metals.  In plating, metal treating, or mining
 the precious metals are nearly always recovered.  Silver is plated from
                                                                1 *ifi?
 cyanide solutions or precipitated by the addition of zinc dust.
 Copper is precipitated from cyanide solutions by the addition of hydrazine.
 Nickel and copper are precipitated at elevated temperatures at a pH above
 3.5 by the addition of iron.0783

                                                      1112
      Waste - Plus - Waste Method.  George arid Cochran     describe a method
 for the recovery of six metal cyanides.  Addition of an acid waste to an
 alkaline cyanide waste was investigated for five different combinations of
 cyanide wastes.  At the optimum final  pH values of the mixtures, the metal
 cyanides were almost quantitatively precipitated.  The pH was adjusted by
 the addition of acid rinse water and lime.  No evolution of hydrogen
 cyanide was detected.  The waste-plus-waste technique, though not in com-
 mercial use, is attractive because no reagents for recovery are required
 of the metal cyanides and the effluent may be treated to reduce residual
 cyanide content via chlorination or electrolytic oxidation.

                          Cyanide Destruction

     The chemical destruction of cyanides in liquid waste streams has
received a great deal of attention and numerous methods have been proposed.
Some of the more attractive methods are briefly discussed in the following
paragraphs.  For dilute cyanide wastes, chlorination under alkaline condi-
tions is generally favored; too mich heat Is generated if the technique is

-------
used on concentrated wastes and undesirable and dangerous side-reactions
will take place unless the operation is carried out very slowly, or the
waste is first diluted.  When considerable amounts of concentrated wastes
must be treated, e.g.9 from cyanide heat-treating, the wastes must be
diluted or another method for cyanide destruction such as electrolytic
oxidation must be used.

     Chiorination.  Oxidation of cyanides by the hypochlorite ion (which
may be furnished  by either chlorine or sodium or calcium hypochlorite)
proceeds in three stages.    '

         CM" + H* + OC1"  -* CNC1 + OH"                               (1)
         CMC! + 20H" -> CNO" + Cl + H20                               (2)
         2CNO" + 30C1~ + H20 ->  2C02 + N£ + 3C1" + 20H"          .     (3)

     Reaction (1) is very fast; reaction (2) is very slow below pH 9 unless
excess hypochlorite is presentj at pH 10 or higher it is rather rapid and
oxidation to the cyanate stage  is complete in 5 minutes or less, provided
no nickel ion is present.  If nickel is present,, reaction (2) is not com-
pleted in less than 30 minutes,, and then only if 20 percent excess reagent
is used.  Reaction (3) is very  slow above pH 9 requiring at least an hour,
and many hours if the  pH is 11  or more.  The best practice is to adjust the
pH to 8.5 and allow 1  hour reaction time.    About 10 percent excess hypo-
chlorite should be useds or destruction of the cyanides will be incomplete.
     The heavy metals  present will be precipitated as hydroxides or carbonates
in total chlorination  treatment.  An exception is copper which will not be
precipitated in wastes containing copper and rochelle salts unless suffi-
cient calcium is also  present as chloride or hydroxide„ so that the tartrate
will be precipitated as the calcium salts thus allowing precipitation of
copper.  It has been shown that iron cyanide complexes are not destroyed
by chlorination and that a cyanide residual reappears on long standing
(100 hours).

-------
     Total chlon'nation (i.e.9 to N2 and C02) does not lend itself readily
to continuous treatment processes because current control methods are not
adequate.  If a packaged cyanide treatment system is employeds continuous
operation for oxidation to cyanate (1,000 times less toxic than cyanide) is
possible.      A second system is required for oxidation of cyanatess with
appropriate holding time due to the slow reaction.

     Kastone Process.  DuPont has introduced a process which appeals
primarily to small plant operators using cyanide baths to plate zinc or
cadmium.  This process oxidizes cyanides to cyanates and simultaneously
precipitates zinc or cadmium complexes by simple filtration.  The Kastone
Process  uses a proprietary peroxygen formulation that contains 41 percent
                                                    0484 0485
hydrogen peroxide with trace amounts of stabilizers.  ij-T^~t^  jne cyanates,
though 1,000 times less toxic than cyanides, cannot be discharged into most
natural  streams.  Therefore, this process has only limited application.
   /—
  <   Electrolytic Oxidation.  Automatic electrolytic oxidation units are
marketed by Research Control, Inc., for complete decomposition of cyanide
ion content in waste streams.      Some difficulties have been reported
with this unit for dilute solutions, but this problem has been circum-
vented by using a semi conductive bed in the cell.  The bed serves as an
intermediate electrode that provides in effect more than a million anode
and cathode sites per cubic foot.

     Radiation Decomposition.  A patent has been  issued  for destroying
cyanides by gamma radiation which serves to rupture the  CsN triple bond
and converts the cyanide ion  into hai
is not in commercial use at present.
                                                       0287
and converts the cyanide ion into harmless by-products.       This method
     Conversion of Cyanides to Ferrocyanide by Ferrous Sulfate.  The
formulation of less toxic cyanide complexes such as ferro and ferricyanides
has been used as a method for disposing of cyanide waste waters.  This pro-
cess involves the use of iron salts to form complex compounds with the free
cyanide in the wastes.  These cyanide complexes are precipitated and
removed as sludge.  The major advantage of this treatment method is that

-------
it is relatively inexpensive where waste ferrous sulfate is available.
However, considerable quantities of sludge are formed, and the treated
solutions are strongly colored.  There is also evidence that ferrocyanides
may decompose to free cyanide  in the presence of sunlight.  The
regeneration of cyanide  can then contaminate the receiving stream.

     Reaction with an Aldehyde.  A patent has been  issued for the removal
of cyanide  from a waste  stream by reaction with an  excess of an aldehyde
                           1791
according to the following    :

                 KCN + CH20  (aqueous) + H20 -»- HOCH2CN + KOH
                 CNCH2OH + KOH + H20 + HOCHgCOOK +  NH3

It is claimed that nearly all  cyanides,  even stable complexes,  are des-
troyed in this manner.   However, though the reaction products are not toxic,
there is the problem of disposal  of the organic compounds formed.

     Ozonation.   Ozonation is reported to be more economical  and easier to
control than chlorination.  Ozonation, however, oxidizes cyanides only to
the cyanate in accordance with the reaction given below.
                         3CN~ + 03 +3CNO"
                                                         I CCO
The oxidation of the cyanate is too slow to be practical.

     Acidification.   Waste acid solutions have been used to acidify cyanide
waste solution.   Air is then passed through the solution and  the liberated
hydrogen cyanide is discharged up a high stack or is passed through a
burner.  This method is not recommended  because of the danger involved.

     Lagooning.   Though the methods discussed above are available for
treating cyanide wastes,  lagooning of cyanide wastes from small  and medium
sized metal  processing  and plating operations is widely practiced.   For
example, in the Los Angeles area commercial  waste disposal  companies col-
lect cyanide wastes and truck these wastes to a large abandoned rock quarry.
If precious metals, such as silver, are  present, these are first removed
by salvage companies.   :
                                   131-

-------
     The use of lagoons for cyanide wastes cannot be recommended because
the cyanides may some day leak into underground water supplies and the
wastes, if acidifieds will liberate hydrogen cyanide.

               6.  APPLICABILITY TO NATIONAL DISPOSAL SITES
     The oxidation of cyanides in alkaline solution by chlorine or hypo-
chlorites is an acceptable method for destroying cyanide.   However,
because cyanide wastes are generated by a large number of metal treating
operators, some of whom are small., in some cases proper treatment is an
economic burden and not always complete.  It is, therefore, recommended
that National Disposal Sites have the capability for treatment of cyanide
wastes by the use of the  chlorination techniques.
     Additional research  is recommended to establish operations that will
permit recovery of the various metals, and either recovery or destruction
of the cyanide.  A study  is also recommended  of the economics associated
with the various recovery methods proposed or now in use .
                                 132

-------
                             7.   REFERENCES


0287. Byron, R. F.  Radiation decomposition of waste cyanide-solutions.
        U. S. Patent 3,147,213.

0484. Martin, Jr., M. H.   Kastone process.   Washington,  Environmental
        Science and Technology,  5(6):496-497, June 1971.

0485. Zeroing in on plating wastes.   Chemical Week, 107(25):54-55,
        Dec. 16, 1970.

0536. Federal Water Pollution Control  Administration, U.  S.  Department of
        the Interior.  Report on the  committee on water  quality criteria.
        Apr. 1, 1968.  234 p.

0586. Eckenfelder, Jr., W. W.  Industrial water pollution control.
        McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1966.

0783. Battelle Memorial Institute.  A state-of-the-art review of metal
        finishing waste treatment.  PB-203 207.  Ohio, Nov.  1968.   88 p.

1111. Grune, W. N.  Plating and  cyanide waste literature review.  Water
        Pollution Control Federation  Journal, 40(6):1,180-1,198, June 1968.

1112. George, L. C., and A. A. Cochran.  Recovery of metals  from electro-
        plating wastes by the waste-plus-waste method.  Technical  Progress
        Report 27.  Pittsburgh9  Pennsylvania, Aug. 1970.   12 p.

1146. Camp, J. M., and C. B. Francis.   Liquid carburizing.  The Making,
        Shaping and Treatment of Steel.  U. S. Steel Company, 1961.

1158. Henglein, J. A.  Chemical  technology.  Oxford, England, Pergamon
        Press, 1969.  894 p.

1309. Harshaw Pollutronics.  Improving todays environment for a better
        tomorrow.  Cleveland, Ohio,  The Harshaw Chemical  Company.

1433. Kirk-Othmer encyclopedia of chemical  technology.  2d ed.  22  v.  and
        suppl.  New York, Wiley-Interscience Publishers, 1963-1971.

1562. Graham, H. K.  Electroplating engineering handbook.  2d ed.   Westwood,
        New Jersey, Metals and Plastics Publications, Inc.,  1962.   773 p.

1791. Morico, J. L.  Process for the  destruction of cyanide  in waste
        solutions.  U. S. Patent No.  3,5059217.  Apr. 7, 1970.  7 p.
                                  133

-------
                                  HAZARDOUS fc!ASTES PROPERTIES
                                          WORKSHEET

H. M. Name    Cadi urn Cyanide (84)
                                                                Structural  Formula
IUC Name      Cadi urn cyanide
Common Names
Cd(CN)
                                                                     2
Molecular Wt.       164.45	    Melting Pt.  7200 decomposes   Boiling Pt.
Density (Condensed)  2.226      @  20  	C_ Density (gas)	9	
Vapor Pressure (recommended 55 C and 20 C)
              0                               @                                (
Flash Point	Autolgnltion Temp.
Flammability Limits in Air (wt %)    Lower	    Upper_
Explosive Limits in Air (wt. %)      Lower	    Upper_

Solubility
    Cold Mater  1-71 at 15 C	  Hot Water	   Ethanol    si  sol
    Others:  Alkali cyanide or hydroxide solutions
Acid, Base Properties	
Highly Reactive with_
Compatible with    Most metals
Shipped in_
ICC Classification  Poison B < 200 Ib.           Coast Guard Classification Poison  B Label
 Comments    Usgd, jn bright copper electroplating-
            Readily forms complex cyanides.
References  (1) 1433

-------
                                  HAZARDOUS WASTES PROPERTIES
                                          WORKSHEET


H. M. Name    Calcium  cyanide  (91)            .
                                                               Structural Formula
IUC Name      Calcium  cyanide

Common Names  "Black cyanide"     	
Molecular Wt.    92.12	    Melting Pt.   1840 C           Boiling Pt._

Density (Condensed)	@	Density (gas)	-	@	

Vapor Pressure (recommended 55 C and 20 C)
Flash Point 	^	         Autoignition Temp.
Flammability Limits in Air (wt %)    Lower	-	    Upper_

Explosive Limits in Air (wt.  %)      Lower	-	    Upper_


Solubility
    Cold Hater Partial hydrolysis      Hot Hater	   Ethanol_

    Others:	

Acid, Base Properties  I" water becomes alkaline due to hydrolysis	
Highly Reactive with   weak acids to give HCN,  decomposes  in  moist air.   Solution  alkaline.
 Reacts with CQ? of air.	
Compatible with
Shipped in   4 oz to 100 1b metal  container
                    Poison label
ICC Classification  Class B poison	  Coast Guard Classification
Coiranents      Article of commerce  contains  40-50%  Ca(CN)?
References (1) 1433
                                              135

-------
                                  HAZARDOUS WASTES PROPERTIES
                                          WORKSHEET

H. M. Name   Copper cyanide  (120)
                                                               Structural Formula
IUC Mama     Cupric cyanide
Common Names
Cu(CN)
                                                                  2
Molecular Wt. 	115.61          Melting Pt.    Decomposes        Boiling  Pt._
Density (Condensed)	@	Density (gas)	9	
Vapor Pressure (recommended 55 C and 20 C)
Flash Point	         Autoignitlon Temp.
Flammability Limits in Air (wt %)    Lower	    Upper_
Explosive Limits in Air (wt.  %)      Lower	    Upper_
Solubility
    Cold Hater       Inso1 •	  Hot Water	:	   Ethanol     sol,
    Others:  Soluble  in  acids or. bases, sol in cyanide  solution
Acid, Base Properties	
Highly Reactive with  Acid to give HCM.  Not sjfcabie^can b& dried.
Compatible with_
Shipped in  Glass bottles, special drums.
ICC Classification    None.	  Coast Guard Classification,
Commen ts	:	
              Not normally an  item of commerce.
References  (1)   1433
                                          136

-------

                                   HAZARDOUS WASTES PROPERTIES
                                          WORKSHEET
H. M. Name  Cuprous cyanide (128)
IUC Warns    Cuprous cyantde
Common Names
                                                                Structural  Formula
                                                                    CuCN
                  89.56
Molecular Wt.
Density (Condensed)  2.92
                                     Melting Pt
                                                      474 C
                                                                    Boiling Pt.
                                G>  20
                                             Density  (gas)
 Vapor Pressure (recommended  55  v  and  20 0
Flash Point
                                   Autolgnitlon Temp.
Flammabllity Limits in Air (wt %)     Lower
Explosive Limits in Air (wt.  X)      Loaer
Solubility
    Cold Hater
                      Insol
                                       Hot Mater     Insol
                                                             Upper_
                                                             Upper_
                                                                      Ethanol
     Others:   Sol  in NH^OH, alkali cyanide  solutions
 Acid,  Base Properties      None
Highly Reactive
                       Decomposed by HNO, and dil HC1.
Compatible with
                       Metals, glass
 Shipped  in    10Q-1b drums
ICC Classification   None
Comments
                                                 Coast Guard Classification
 References (1)
ias;
                                               137

-------

                                  HAZARDOUS WASTES PROPERTIES
                                          hflRKSHEET
H. M. Name  Lead cyanide  (239)
IUC Name    Lead cyanide
                                                               Structural Formula
Common Names
                                                                Pb(CN),
Molecular Wt.
Density (Condensed)
                  259.23
                                     Melting Pt.      decomp.        Boiling Pt._
                                @ __ Density (gas) _ 9 _
Vapor Pressure (recommended 55 C and 20 Q)
Flash Point
                                   Auto1gn1tion Temp.
Flammability Limits in Air (wt %)    Lower
Explosive Limits in Air (wt. %)      Lower
                                                             Upper_
                                                             Upper_
Solubility
    Cold Mater  slightly soluble       Hot Water
    Others:     decomposes In arid;
Acid9 Base Properties
                                                                      Ethanol
                                            in NaCN solution
Highly Reactive with   ac1ds
Compatible with_
Shipped in   wooden kegs, fiber drums
ICC Classification   none
                                                 Coast Guard Classification    none
           used in metallurgy
References (1)  1433

-------
                                  HAZARDOUS WASTES PROPERTIES
                                          KDRKSHEET



H. M. Name   Nickel cyanide (295)

             ... ,  ,                     •                       Structural Formula
IUC Wane     Nickel cyanide
Common Names
Ni(CN)
                                                                         2
Molecular Wt.      -[82.81 _    Melting Pt.   losses  HgO @200 C  Boiling  Pt.  decomposes

Density (Condensed) 146. a _ @_2Q_ _ C_ Density (gas)     _ & __


Vapor Pressure (recommended 55 C and 20 C)
Flash Point _ - _         Autolgnition Temp.   -


Flammability Limits  in Air (wt %)    Lower _ ; _    Upper

Explosive Limits in  Air (wt.  %)      Lower _ - _    Upper
Solubility
    Cold Water        Insol.            Hot Water                      Ethanol
    Others:   Slight sol,  in  dil  acid.freely  in  alkali  cyanide,  ammonia and ammonium carbonate.


Acid, Base Properties	
Highly Reactive with      acids.
Compatible with_
Shipped jn  Wooden  kegs,  glass  bottles, fiber drums, paper sacks.
                                                                              HPoison Label
ICC Classification   Poison Label.  Poison B<20Qlbcoast Guard  Classification  Poison B (2)

Comments     Used  in  nickel plating.  Commercial salt  usually contains 20-25% water.	
References (1)   1433
                                            139

-------
                                  HAZARDOUS WASTES PROPERTIES
                                          WORKSHEET
H. M. Name   ^otessjurn cyanide (344)
IUC Mama     Potassium cyanide

Common Names
                                                               Structural  Formula
                                                                     KCN
Molecular Ht.
                     65.11
                                     Melting Pt.      634 c
Density (Condensed)  ]-52       @  20  _^ _ Density (gas)_
Boiling Pt..
Vapor Pressure (recommended 55 C and 20 Q
Flash Point
                                   Auto1gnit1on Temp.
Flammabllity Limits in Air (wt %)    Lower_
Explosive Limits in Air (wt.  2)      Lowsr_
                                                             Upper_
                                                             Upper_
Solubility
    Cold Hater  33 qm/100 ml
    Others:
                                                                       C
                                       Hot Water   50 gm/lQQ ml  at TQQEthanolSO qm/100 ml
Acid, Base Properties    Strongly alkaline in aqueous solution. pH of 0.1N
 aq.soln. = 11.0
Highly Reactive with    CO, in a1r9 acids, metal salts, oxidizers
Compatible with     most metals at room temperature
Shipped in_
ICC Classification  Poison B. Poison label
            Article of commerce. 95% KCN
                                                 Coast Guard Classification  Poison B,
                                                                            Poison label
References  (1) 1433

-------
m.^.^-.-A.-^^a'^J..!, .
                                   HAZARDOUS MASTES PROPERTIES
                                           t&RKSHEET


 H.  H.  Mama  Silver cyanide(370)
                                                                Structural Formula
 IUC Kms    Silver cyanide
 Ccjmnon Wamss
 Molecular felt.      133.90(1)         Melting Pt.      320 C dec.(1)  Boiling  Pt._

 Density (Condensed)     3.95     @  20   C    Density (gas)	?	

 Vapor Pressure  (reconnietided 55  C and 20  (3

              9                         -     ©	                   -      C
 Flash  Point	        Auto1gn1t1on Jmp._
 Flanonablllty  Limits  in Air  (wt %)    Lowar	=	    Upper_
 Explosive Limits  in  A1r  (wt.  %)      Lo^sr	=	    Upper_

 Solubility
    Cold Uater    Insol.	 Hot Mater  Insol.	  Ethanol   Insol,
    Others:     Insol.  dil.  acids„  sol,  in alkali cyanides

Acid, Base Properties	
Highly Reactive with     Darkens  on  exposure to air.   HC1  releases to HCM.
Compatible with
Shipped in	
                                                                             Poison B
ICC Classification    Poison  B, Poison Label      Coast Guard Classification  Poison label
 Comments.
 References  (1)  1433
                                               141

-------
HA
H. H. Name Sodium cyanide (387)
IDC Name Sodium cyanide
Common Names
Molecular Ht. 49.02
ZARDOUS WASTES PROPERTIES
WJRKSHEET
Structural Formula
NaCN

Melting Pt. 560 C Boiling Pt. 1500 C
Density (Condensed) 1.60(cubic)g 20 C Density (gas) - 9
Vapor Pressure (recommended 55 C and
0.76 mmHg @ 800 C^
20 0
3.34 g 900 C ^ 36 mmHg @ 100 C^
Flash Point - Autolgnition Temp. -
Flammability Limits in Air (wt %)
Explosive Limits in Air (wt. %)
Solubility
Cold Water 32-8 gm/100 ml at
Lower - Upper
Lower - Upper
r(D
10 Hot Water 45 gm/100 ml at 34.7 tthanol si. sol.
Others: v- sol in lq- %
Acid,, Base Properties Strongly alkaline..

Highly Reactive with yhpn hpat-j>rf
reacts with molten NaCN. Is a aood
S Si ntroconrp nf fy^Arac nf Co r\v* U4 HArnmn^c-ar A 4 w»
redutijna substance. Reacts with acids to liheratP HPW
Compatible with most materials of construction.

Shipped in 25 Ib oackaoes. 100
ICC Classification Po1son C1ass B
ConraB»nt< Sold as 30% soln, 73-752,
,. 160. 200 Ib drums
Coast Guard Classification Poison Class B
96-98% briquettes „ qranular
References  (1)  1433
                                      142

-------
                                  HAZARDOUS WASTES PROPERTIES
                                          WORKSHEET


H. H. Name     Zinc cyanide   (457)
                                                               Structural Formula
IDC Name       Zinc cyanide
Common Names
Zn(CN)
                                                                     2
Molecular Wt.     117.42	    Melting Pt.    uPrnmp Ann r      Boiling Pt._

Density (Condensed)	@	Density (gas)	@	
Vapor Pressure (recommended 55 C and 20 Q)
Flash Point 	         Autoignition Temp.
Flammability Limits in Air (wt %)    Lower     	    Upper
Explosive Limits in Air (wt.  %)      Lower	    Upper_

Solubility
    Cold Water 0.00058g/100g @18 C     Hot Water	   Ethanol   Insoluble

    Others:    Soluble  in dilute mineral acids.

Acid, Base Properties	
Highly Reactive with
Compatible with_
Shipped in_
ICC Classification  Poison B - Poison Label       Coast  Guard  Classification	Poison  B

Commen ts	„	
References (1)  1433
                                            143

-------
 BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATA
 SHEET
                     1. Report No.
                      EPA-670/2-73-053-6
                                                                   3. Recipient's Accession No.
4. Title and subtitle  Recommended  Methods of Reduction,  Neutralization,
 Recovery, or Disposal of Hazardous Waste.   Volume V, National
 Disposal Site  Candidate Waste Stream Constituent Profile
 Reports - Pesticides and Cyanide Compounds
                                                                     5. Report Date

                                                                     Issuing date  - Aug.  1973
                                                                     6.
7. Amhorcsj R.  s.  Ottinger, J.  L.  Blumenthal,  D.  F.  Dal Porto,
 G.  I. Gruber,  M.  J. Santy,  and C. C. Shih	
                                                                     8- Performing Organization Kept.
                                                                       No-  21485-6013-RU-OO
9. Performing Organization Name and Address


 TRW Systems  Group, One Space  Park
 Redondo Beach,  California   90278
                                                                     10. Project/Task/Work Unit No.
                                                                     11. Contract/Grant No.


                                                                        68-03-0089
12. Sponsoring Organization Name and Address
 National Environmental Research  Center
 Office of Research and Development
 U.S. Environmental Protection  Agency
 Cincinnati,  Ohio  45268
                                                                     13. Type of Report & Period
                                                                        Covered

                                                                        Final
                                                                     14.
15, Supplementary Notes

 Volume V of 16  volumes.
16. Abstracts
This volume  contains summary  information and  evaluation of waste  management methods  in
the form of  Profile Reports for pesticides and  inorganic cyanides.   These Profile
Reports were prepared for either a particular hazardous waste stream'constituent or  a
group of related constituents.   Each Profile  Report contains a discussion of the
general characteristics of the  waste stream constituents, their toxicology and other
associated hazards, the definition of adequate  management for the waste material,  an
evaluation of the current waste management practices with regard  to their adequacy,  and
recommendation as to the most appropriate processing methods available and whether the
waste material  should be considered as a candidate for National Disposal, Industrial
Disposal, or Municipal  Disposal.
17. Key Words and Document Analysis. 17o. Descriptors
Pesticides
Inorganic Cyanide  Compounds
National  Disposal  Site Candidate
Hazardous Wastes
17b. Identifiers/Open-Ended Terms
17C.COSATI Field/Group   06p.
                                   .  Q7C; 07E; ] -jg .  -,
18. Availability Statement
Release  to public.
                                             - 144 -
                                                          19.. Security Class (This
                                                            Report)
                                                              UNCLASSIFIED
                                                              ~...^-~-...~-~.. ... ~-
                                                          20. Security Class (This
                                                            Page
                                                          	 UNCLASSIFIED
                                                                             21. No. of Pages

                                                                                  150
                                                                               22. Price

-------