State Air Pollution Implementation Plan Progress Report, January 1 to June 30, 1976


EPA-450/2-76-026
October 1976
          STATE AIR POLLUTION
         IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
           PROGRESS REPORT,
       JANUARY 1 TO JUNE 30, 1976
        U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
            Office of Air and Waste Management

-------
                                    EPA-450/2-76-026
             STATE AIR POLLUTION

             IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

              PROGRESS REPORT,

         JANUARY 1 TO JUNE 30, 1976
               Prepared by

    U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency
     Office of A1r and Waste Management
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Research  Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711


                  and

    U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency
          Office of Enforcement
            Washington, D.C.
    U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
     Office of Air and Waste Management
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711

              October 1976

-------
This report has been reviewed by the Office of Enforcement and the Office of
Air Quality Planning and Standards of the Environmental Protection Agency and
approved for publication.
Document 1s available to the public through the National Technical Information
Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161.
                    Publication No. EPA-450/2-76-026

-------
                               FOREWORD

     This is the seventh in a continuing series of reports assessing the
progress made by states in implementing the Clean Air Act, specifically
section 110.  Although the report is primarily intended to cover the-first
six months of calendar year 1976, more recent information is provided when
available.
     The State Implementation Plans (SIPs) were published in 1972 with an
attainment date, in most cases, of May 1975.  Measurable increments of
progress are occurring at a slower rate than in the first years these
plans were in effect.  The most generally available procedures and technology
have been or are being implemented for the most part; remaining problems are
not yielding as easily to solution.  Some of the procedures and technology
that have been implemented have been challenged in court, and litigation has
affected progress, both by delaying implementation and enforcement and by
extending EPA's responsibilities to such programs as prevention of signifi-
cant deterioration and increased attention to air quality maintenance.
Situations that were not anticipated when the Clean Air Act was amended in
1970, such as the energy crisis, have required that different approaches
be developed, and this development takes time.
     This series of reports has undergone a change in format that reflects
the changing direction and emphasis of EPA's campaign for clean air.  The
first four reports followed similar formats and generally presented infor-
mation summarized by EPA region with national totals.  The fifth report in
the series was the first one to be published after the attainment date,
and it provided detailed information by state for the first time.  The
sixth report was primarily a summary report, with certain topics singled
out for special focus.  This report, like the fifth report, provides
detailed information by states.  This report focuses on the attainment/
non-attainment determinations and the subsequent calls for SIP revisions
that were made.

-------
                            CONTENTS

                                                                Page

LIST OF TABLES	      v1

LIST OF FIGURES	     vii
ABBREVIATIONS  	    viii

  I.  SUMMARY	       1
      State Implementation Plan Revisions  .... 	       1
      Air Quality Trends 	       2
      Stationary Source Compliance 	       2
      Control Agency Support .... 	 .       3
      New Source Review  	 ......       3

 II.  OVERVIEW OF STATE PLANS  	       5
      Development of State Implementation Plans  .......       5
      Trends in Air Quality, 1970-1975 	       8
      Stationary Source Compliance 	      11
      New Source Review  	      19
      Sulfur Dioxide Emission Regulations  	      24
      Air Quality Monitoring	      25
      Air Pollution Episodes	      32
      Control Agency Support 	      32
III.  STATE PROFILES	      39
      Introduction 	      39
      Region I
        Connecticut	 .      42
        Maine	 .      45
        Massachusetts	      48
        New Hampshire	      51
        Rhode Island	      54
        Vermont	      57
      Region II
        New Jersey	      62
        New York	      65
        Puerto Rico	      68
        Virgin Islands  	      71
      Region III
        Delaware	      76
        District of Columbia 	      79
        Maryland	      82
        Pennsylvania	      85
        Virginia	,      88
        West Virginia	      91

-------
                     CONTENTS (continued)
                                                          Page
Region IV
  Alabama	       96
  Florida	       99
  Georgia	      102
  Kentucky	      105
  Mississippi  	      108
  North Carolina	      Ill
  South Carolina	      114
  Tennessee	      117

Region V
  Illinois	      122
  Indiana	      125
  Michigan	      128
  Minnesota	      131
  Ohio	      134
  Wisconsin	      138
Region VI
  Arkansas	      142
  Louisiana	      145
  New Mexico	      148
  Oklahoma	      151
  Texas	      154
Region VII
  Iowa	      158
  Kansas	      161
  Missouri	      164
  Nebraska	      167
Region VIII
  Colorado	      172
  Montana	      175
  North Dakota	      178
  South Dakota	      181
  Utah	      184
  Wyoming	      187
Region IX
  American Samoa 	      192
  Arizona	      195
  California	      198
  Guam	      201
  Hawaii	      204
  Nevada	      207
Region X
  Alaska	      212
  Idaho	      215
  Oregon	      218
  Washington	      221

-------
LIST OF TABLES
Table v\ Page

Part II •;--..'• .- •.. ,- •• - •• ' -•'- • '•.• r • " '•' '
II-l. National Attainment/Non-Attainment Status
of AQCRs and State Portions 6

I1-2. Compliance Status of Major Emitters, by
Region, July 1, 1976 13

II-3. Status of Compliance with Emission Limitations,
Major Polluting Steel Processes vs. All Major
Stationary Source Installations, September 1976 . 18

II-4. Current Status of NSR Program Responsibilities . . 21

II-5. S02 Control Regulation Relaxation for Power Plants. 26

11-6. Monitoring Sites Reporting Data (1975) 29

II-7. Numbers of Sites at Which Monitoring Has Been
Conducted, 1970-1975 31

II-8. Monitoring Sites Reporting Data Meeting Annual
Summary Criteria (1975) 33

II-9. Summary of Air Pollution Episodes for January
Through June 1976 35

Part III. (Tables A-D are given for each of the 55 states.
See Table of Contents for page number of states.)

A. Attainment Status of National Ambient Air Quality
Standards by Air Quality Control Region

B. Status of Selected Portions of the State Implementation
Plan

C. Comparison of FY 1977 Projected Needs and Actual
FY 1976 Resources

D. Summary of State Enforcement Activity (June 30, 1976)
VI

-------
                             ijst or FIGURES

Figure                                                        Page
!•].  Trends of FQMF Indicators  qf  Enforcement Activity  ,  ,  ,   14

-------
                              ABBREVIATIONS

AQCR                Air Quality Control Region
AQMA                Air Quality Maintenance Area
CO                  carbon monoxide
EPA                 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
FGD                 flue gas desulfurization
HC                  hydrocarbons
NAAQS               National Ambient Air Quality Standards
NESHAP              National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air
                      Pollutants
N02                 nitrogen dioxide
NSPS                New Source Performance Standard
NSR                 New Source Review
OAQPS               Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
0                   oxidants
 /\
PSD                 Prevention of Significant Deterioration
SIP                 State Implementation Plan
S02                 sulfur dioxide
State               Refers to the District of Columbia and four U.S.
                      territories as well as the 50 states
TSP                 total suspended particulate
                                vl if

-------
                            ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

     The preparation of this report resulted from information provided
by the state and local air pollution control agencies, the Environmental
Protection Agency Regional Offices, and various EPA Headquarters groups.
     As with earlier reports relating to State Implementation Plan
progress, this edition continues to be a joint effort between the
Division of Stationary Source Enforcement, Office of Enforcement, and
the Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Office of Air and
Waste Management.
     Information on enforcement activities was provided by the Division
of Stationary Source Enforcement, Office of Enforcement.  Additional
specific information on EPA air programs can be obtained by contacting
the EPA Regional Offices.

-------
                           I.   SUMMARY

STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN REVISIONS
    EPA and the states have been engaged in an intensive effort to identify
those areas not. attaining the  national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS)
by the attainment date (May 31, 1975, for most states)  and to ascertain the
reasons for non-attainment. The Clean Air Act requires that whenever the
Administrator finds the State  Implementation Plan (SIP) to be "substantially
inadequate" a revision to the  SIP must be called for.  In most areas of the
country, EPA issued calls for  revisions to attain and maintain the standards
on June 30, 1976.
    Many areas of the country  showed attainment of the standards; no SIP
revisions were necessary for those air quality control  regions (AQCRs) or
state portions of interstate AQCRs.*  The greatest number of AQCRs and state
portions showing attainment were for nitrogen dioxide (308), sulfur dioxide (256)
and carbon monoxide (233).  Substantially fewer AQCRs and state portions attained
the standards for oxidants (143) and total suspended particulates (124).
    There were 246 calls for SIP revision for attainment/maintenance for
specific pollutants.  Non-attainment of the oxidant standard accounted for
calls for revision in 114 AQCRs or state portions.  Seventy-eight calls for
revisions were made for TSP.  There were also calls for revisions for CO
(41), S02 (12), and N02 (1).
    There were only 25 pollutant specific calls for revision for maintenance
only.  However, the calls for  revision for attainment described above also
included maintenance provisions.  There were 11 calls for TSP maintenance
revisions alone and 11 calls for sulfur dioxide maintenance revisions
alone.  There were also calls  for maintenance revisions for CO (2),
oxidants (1), and N02 (1).

*The figure of 313 AQCRs and state portions of interstate AQCRs is used
here rather than the figure of 247 AQCRs because some AQCRs overlap
state boundaries.  Different state portions of the same AQCR could therefore
have a different attainment status.

-------
      The state summaries indicate that there are a number of AQCRs or state
 portions which are not attaining the standards but where no SIP revision is
 being called for:  100 for TSP, 34 for S02, 37 for CO, 56 for 0 , and 3 for
 N02.   In most cases no revisions were called for because the EPA* Regional
 Offices felt that full compliance with the existing SIP would bring
 attainment.
     Many states have adopted less restrictive S02 emission regulations since
January 1975.  Revision efforts were directed toward major fuel burning
installations, electric utilities in particular.  Important factors causing
this included the limited quantity and high cost of low sulfur fuels and
the realization by many states that their regulations were more restrictive
than needed to attain and maintain the national ambient air quality
standards for sulfur dioxide.

AIR QUALITY TRENDS
     From 1971 to 1975 TSP levels have decreased by four percent annually.
In the Northeast and the Great Lakes areas the improvement has been even
faster.  S02 concentrations have decreased by an average of 30 percent
since 1970.  Improvement in CO levels from 1970 to 1975 has been seven
percent annually in California and five percent annually in the rest of
the nation.  Long-term trend data for oxidants is not available but short-
term trend analysis (1973-1975) shows improvement in the East and in
California in particular.  N02 levels have shown mixed trends.
STATIONARY SOURCE COMPLIANCE
     Enforcement of standards at stationary sources has focused on the
21,930 major emitters which account for about 80 percent of all air
pollution from conventional stationary point sources.  By July 1, 1976, EPA
and the states had brought 19,833 of them into compliance or placed them
on enforceable schedules leading to compliance in the near future.  Com-
pliance levels have climbed from 84 percent to about 90 percent during
FY 1976.  In the past six months EPA has taken 395 enforcement actions and
completed 4,079 investigations, including plant inspections, opacity obser-
vations, emission tests, and formal  inquiries for evidence.

-------
      States  report that in  the last six months  they have  conducted over
 87,000 investigations  of compliance status  and  have taken 9,771 enforcement
 actions,  including 7,081 notices  of violation and 2,690 enforcement orders
 or civil/criminal  actions.
      Despite all  of this enforcement activity,  1,611  major sources still
 violate emission  limits or  compliance schedules and nearly 500 must be
 inspected to determine their compliance status.

CONTROL AGENCY SUPPORT
     The gap between the need for and availability of state and local  air
pollution resources to attain and maintain ambient air quality standards
continues to exist.  The state air pollution aqencies estimated in 1973
that 9500 man-years were necessary to accomplish  the implementation plans
in 1975 and that approximately 10,350 man-years would be necessary to
accomplish revised implementation plans  in 1977.  The shortfall,  using
the 10,350 man-year estimate as the base in FY  1976, showed that  approxi-
mately 66 percent of the manpower and 73 percent  of the funds were actually
available to responsible control agencies.  In  FY 1976 control agency
resources increased by approximately $9.2 million and 300 man-years over
1975.

 NEW  SOURCE REVIEW

      New  source review (NSR)  requirements are being implemented through
 four types of  programs:
      1.  to  review stationary  sources whose construction  or modification
 would  interfere with the attainment  and maintenance of national ambient
 air  quality  standards.
      2.  to  review sources whose construction or  modification would cause
 significant  deterioration (PSD) of  air  quality.
      3.  to  review sources whose construction or  modification would cause
 the  emission of a  hazardous  air pollutant in excess of a  prescribed
 limitation.
      4.   to  advise whether a  source will comply with standards of perform-
 ance  of new  sources when in  operation.
                                  3

-------
     EPA distributed guidelines to its' Regional  Offices to recommend a
consolidated approach by the Regional Offices to preconstruction reviews
of new sources until states adopt their own procedures or have been delegated
EPA authority.  The Regions have developed interim  programs to review new
sources for PSD and have encouraged states to take  complete responsibility
for new source review.

-------
                        II.   OVERVIEW OF STATE PLANS

DEVELOPMENT OF STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLANS (SIPs)
     Since the attainment date for National  Ambient Air Quality Staridards
(May 31, 1975, for most states) EPA and the states have been engaged in an
intensive effort to identify those areas not attaining1standards and to
ascertain the reasons for non-attainment.  Preliminary assessments of the
areas not expected to attain were given in a previous report of this series.
A major part of the effort to ascertain the reasons for non-attainment was
the effort to determine SIP "adequacy."  Section  110(a)(2)(H)(ii) of the
Clean Air Act as amended requires that SIPs provide "for revision, after
public hearings, of such plan ... whenever the Administrator finds on the
basis of information available to him that the plan is substantially in-
adequate to achieve the national  ambient air quality primary or secondary
Standard which it implements" (emphasis added).  In most areas of the
country, EPA issued calls for revisions to attain and maintain standards
on June 30, 1976.
     This report summarizes the calls for revisions and also indicates those
Air Quality Control Regions (AQCRs) where standards have not been attained
but where the SIP has not been determined substantially inadequate-  SIPs
may fall into any of four different categories:  attainment, revision for
attainment and maintenance, revision for maintenance only, and non-attain-
ment (See Table II-l).  In AQCRs where calls for  attainment and maintenance
were issued the state will have to revise the SIP to include, as needed to
meet and maintain national standards, all achievable emission limitations
by July 1, 1977.  Any other controls needed to meet and maintain national
standards (which may include transportation and land-use measures)
must be submitted by the state by July 1, 1978.  Nationally, there were
246 pollutant specific calls of this type but there were only 25 pollutant
specific calls for maintenance revisions only.  Finally, there were 230
pollutant specific non-attainment decisions where a call for revision was
not needed at this time.  Altogether, of the 313  AQCRs and state portions,
245 will not attain standards for one or more pollutants.

-------
                   TABLE II-l.  NATIONAL ATTAINMENT/NON-ATTAINMENT
                           STATUS OF AQCRs AND STATE PORTIONS
SIP Status                    TSP      SO,      CO      Ov       NOV
                                         £               XX

Attainment                    124      256      233     143      308


Revisions for
Attainment/
Maintenance                    78       12       41     114        1

Revisions for
Maintenance                    11       11        2       0        1

Non-Attainment-
no revisions                  100       34       37      56        3
                              313      313      313     313      313

-------
     It should be noted that the discussion below and the AQCR specific
information presented in the state summaries is based on the calls made on
or before June 30, 1976.  It is currently expected that there will be
additional calls for some areas for both attainment/maintenance and
maintenance alone.  This is primarily the result of insufficient data being
available at this time.
Revisions for Attainment/Maintenance
     As noted above, there are currently 246 pollutant specific ealls for
SIP revisions for attainment/maintenance.  Non-attainment of the oxidant
standard accounts for nearly half of these calls, with 114 AQCRs or state
positions being affected.  The large number of affected AQCRs results in
part from the calls for statewide revisions for many states in Regions II,
III, and V.  Because of the transport problems, it is now recognized that
to attain the oxidant standard hydrocarbon controls will need to be in-
stituted over wide areas.  The second largest number of calls were made for
total suspended particulate (TSP).  These calls were made for 78 AQCRs and
state portions.  A review of the calls indicates that additional point source
controls and fugitive dust control were the measures most frequently rec-
ommended.  The control of fugitive dust will be a relatively new program for
most control agencies and will involve agencies in controlling construction
sites, reentrained street dust, unpaved roadways, and other fugitive sources.
There were calls for CO revisions in 41 AQCRs or state portions.  Half of
these calls were in Regions I and IX.  There were 12 calls for S02 revisions.
These calls generally recommended additional point source controls.  Finally,
there was one call for an N02 revision.  This plan revision is needed in
Los Angeles.
Revision for Maintenance
     As noted above, there were only 25 pollutant specific calls for re-
visions for maintenance alone.  However, the calls for attainment revisions
also involved requests for maintenance provisions.  There were 11 calls of
TSP maintenance revisions alone.  These calls combined with the 78 calls for
attainment/maintenance revisions cover 80 of 159 air quality maintenance areas
(AQMAs) which were designated for particulates.  For S02 there were 11 calls for
maintenance revisions alone.  This combined with the 12 attainment/maintenance

-------
calls will cover 28 of the 61 designated AQMAs for S00.  There were only 2
calls for CO maintenance revisions.  However, when combined with thp r.n revisions
noted above this means that all 24 designated CO AQMAs are covered.  For oxidants,
there were no calls for a maintenance revision alone.  At this time, it
appears that all 49 designated AQMAs will have plans prepared.  However,
there is some uncertainty since some of the statewide calls for 0  revisions
                                                                 /\
involved requests for further study.  There was only 1 call for an N0£
maintenance revision.  This means that 2 of the 5 AQMAs designated for NOp
will have SIP revisions.
     An analysis of the calls for SIP revisons indicates that, for S02, CO,
and 0 , there may eventually be more calls for maintenance revisons than
     J\
designated AQMAs.  This results from the fact that several Regional Offices
have called for maintenance revisions for these pollutants in AQMAs which
were not originally thought to have maintenance problems.  It is expected
that, once studies currently underway are completed, there will be
additional calls for maintenance revisons in some areas.
Non-Attainment
     As the state summaries indicate, there are a number of AQCRs or state
portions which are not attaining standards but where no revision to the SIP
has been called for.  This situation occurs in 100 AOCRs or state portions
for TSP, 34 AQCRs or state portions for S0?, 37 for CO, 56 for 0 , and 3
                                          £-                     /\
for N02.  The reason for the majority of these situations was a decision
by the appropriate Regional Office that compliance with the existing SIP
would result in attainment.  However, in some areas the regions are awaiting
the results of on-going studies before calling for SIP revisions.
TRENDS IN AIR QUALITY, 1970-1975
     Considerable progress in achieving the National Ambient Air Quality
Standards has been made for total suspended particulate (TSP), sulfur
dioxide (S0?), carbon monoxide (CO), and oxidants (0 ).  In contrast,
           L*                                        A
trends in nitrogen dioxide (N02) have been mixed.  Currently, an extensive
national historical data base is available for total suspended particulate
and sulfur dioxide.  The national data base for carbon monoxide is limited,
consisting of 102 monitors having three to five years of data.  For oxidants
and nitrogen dioxide, historical data are also limited and the geographical
distribution is very sparse.

                                     8

-------
Total Suspended Particulates (TSP)
     Based on TSP data collected at approximately 1800 monitoring sites,
the estimated number of people exposed to total  suspended particulate
levels in excess of the annual primary standard decreased from 73 million
in 1970 to 49 million in 1974.  This is an improvement of 24 million
fewer people (33 percent) exposed to levels above the standard.   Based on
the same 1800 monitoring sites, TSP trends from 1971  through 1975 have
declined showing a general improvement of 4 percent per year.  There have
been some geographical differences with the northeast and Great Lake areas
improving at even higher rates.  Trends in some of the western states have
been fairly stable, probably due to fugitive (wind blown) dust and to some
extent due to secondary particulates caused by photochemical reactions,
such as in Los Angeles and San Francisco.
     An analysis of the New York-New Jersey-Connecticut AQCR showed that
between 1971 and 1974 approximately 7 million fewer people were exposed to
                                                              3
TSP levels in excess of the primary health standard of 75 pg/m .   This
improvement affected the total population, as well as the school-age and
elderly populations.
Sulfur Dioxide (S02)
     The most recent S02 ambient data based on 545 monitoring sites show
that concentrations in urban areas have decreased by an average of 30 per-
cent since 1970.  The improvement occurred rapidly in the 1970-1973 period
and then levelled off as many areas came into compliance.  Major point
sources located outside of urban areas, such as smelters, pose the greatest
threat to S02 NAAQS at the present time.
Carbon Monoxide (CO)
     Carbon monoxide trends were examined at 102 monitoring sites from
24 states.  Of these, 42 were located in California which is indicative
of the well-established air quality monitoring program in that state.  The
overall picture of sites with three or more years of data between 1970 and
1975 clearly indicates improvement.  Eighty-one percent of the California
sites showed improvement while 78 percent for the rest of the country
showed improvement.  The rate of improvement appears greater in  California

-------
with a median rate of 7 percent per year versus 5 percent for the rest
of the nation based on four or more years of data. This is consistent with
more stringent California CO emission standards.
Oxidants (Ov)/0zone (0,)
A
-------
STATIONARY SOURCE COMPLIANCE
Enforcement of State Plans
The Clean Air Act establishes a strict schedule by which EPA and states
are to abate air pollution. With few exceptions (most notably sulfur oxide
emission limitations for the States of Illinois and Indiana), each state
has enforceable emission limitations for stationary installations, the
source of the large majority of all particulate (TSP) and sulfur oxide (SO )
A
pollution produced by man. These limitations are designed to reduce ambient
pollutant concentrations to levels protective of health and welfare. The
Act generally allows three years from the date of State Implementation
Plan (SIP) approval for EPA and states to implement SIP emission limitations
and achieve the primary (health-related) National Ambient Air Quality
Standards (NAAQS). Except for portions of a few states, where extensions
of up to two years have been granted for one or more pollutants, the primary
standards were to have been achieved by May 31, 1975.
To reach the target air quality levels, state, local, and Federal en-
forcement programs have the responsibility for ensuring that stationary
sources attain and maintain compliance with emission limitations established
by SIPs. Enforcement responsibilities for state-developed, EPA-approved
emission limitations are shared by EPA and the states. The Clean Air Act
recognizes that states have primary responsibility for achieving clean air
within their jurisdictions. When states do not enforce air pollution
control regulations, however, the Act requires EPA to take action. In
accordance with the intent of the Act, the EPA air enforcement program is
designed to ensure that all sources achieve compliance with applicable
regulations. EPA bolsters state air enforcement efforts by supporting
state control agencies through control agency grants, providing specialized
skill and expertise or special contractual efforts, and by taking enforce-
ment actions against selected sources when the states cannot or will not
enforce.
Enforcement of regulations at stationary sources is an immense task
since it is estimated that over 200,000 such sources are now subject to SIP
emission limitations. Of that number, however, about ten percent are major
emitters (facilities individually capable of emitting over 100 tons of a
pollutant each year). As a class, these sources produce over 80 percent
11
-------
of all air pollution from conventional stationary point sources. Therefore,
enforcement programs have first focused on ensuring compliance by such
emitters in order to have the greatest impact on reducing emissions in the
least amount of time. Concentrated efforts expended in this area have
resulted in a highly successful program. As shown in Table II-2, by
July 1, 1976, EPA and states had identified 21,930 such major sources and
had brought 19,833 of them into compliance or placed them on enforceable
schedules leading to compliance in the near future. The previous progress
report predicted that compliance levels would climb from 84 percent to
about 90 percent during FY 1976; the prediction is now fact. A Federal
commitment to enforcement was involved in this increase in compliance
levels. In the past six months EPA has taken 395 enforcement actions.
Federal investigations of compliance status also reflect the effort on the
part of EPA to ensure compliance by stationary sources. In the six-month
period ending June 30, 1976, EPA completed 4,079 investigations (including
plant inspections, opacity observations, emission tests, and formal in-
quiries for evidence, based on the authority of Section 114 of the Act).
Figure 1 illustrates the continuing progress being made in each of these
areas.
State actions are responsible for the bulk of an increase in the
number of major sources brought into compliance. Most of these actions
have been initiated independently, but in some cases occurred as a result
of Federal stimulation. States report that in the last half-year they
have conducted over 87,000 investigations of compliance status and have
taken some 9,771 enforcement actions (7,081 notices of violation and 2,690
enforcement orders or civil/criminal actions). This emphasis on enforce-
ment activity by states has resulted in significant increases in the number
of major sources brought into compliance.
However, 1,611 major sources still violate emission limits or compliance
schedules, and nearly 500 must be inspected to determine their compliance
status. These remaining violators are expected to be the most difficult
sources to bring into compliance because they are often large sources
which have demonstrated a reluctance to make necessary commitments to
curb emissions to the atmosphere. In addition, most of the remaining
major violators and most of the major sources of unknown status are
12
-------
Table II-2. COMPLIANCE STATUS OF MAJOR EMITTERS, BY REGION July 1, 1976
REGION .
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
TOTAL
TOTAL
IDENTIFIED
SOURCES .
1,140
1,805
2,998
4,612
4,434
1,726
1,548
653
2,214
800
21,930
TN COMPLIANCE
WITH
STANDARD .
.939
1,472
2,526
4,042
3,401
1,471
1,316
526
1,950
711
18,354
WITH
SCHEDULE .
72
87
220
152
438
71
165
79
130
65
1,479
TOTAL IN
COMPLIANCE
'NUMBER .
1,011
1,559
2,746
4,194
3,839
1,542
1,481
605
2,080
776
19,833
%a .
89
86
92
91
87
89
96
93
94
97
90
OUT OF COMPLIANCE
NOT
MEETING
SCHEDULE .
22
84
100
10
40
17
13
3
11
13
313
NO
SCHEDULE .
70
101
148
389
378
98
19
40
44
11
1,298
TOTAL OUT OF
COMPLIANCE
NUMBER .
92
185
248
399
418
115
32
43
55
24
1,611
%a .
8
10
8
9
9
7
2
7
2
3
7
UNKNOWN
COMPLIANCE
STATUS
NUMBER .
37
61
4
19
177
69
35
5
79
0
486
%a
3
3
0
0
4
4
2
1
4
0
2
Calculated as percentage of total major sources identified.
-------
20,000
16,000
12,000
8,000
4,000
0
A
JUNE
1974
A

D
# of sources in compliance with standards or a schedule as of date indicated.

Cumulative # of EPA field surveillance actions

# of sources not meeting a schedule or not on a schedule as of date indicated.

# of sources of unknown compliance status as of date indicated.
Figure 1-1. Trends of Four Indicators of Enforcement Activity
14
-------
located in AQCRs that are not expected to attain the primary NAAQS for TSP
and/or SO in the near future. Thus, despite decided progress in SIP en-
/\
forcement, state and Federal tasks with respect to compliance by large
sources are not yet complete.
MAJOR SOURCE CATEGORIES
Several categories of major sources are still posing substantial prob-
lems across the nation in not achieving compliance with emission limitations
within the time limits prescribed by the Clean Air Act. Notable among these
sources are coal-fired power plants, integrated iron and steel manufacturing
plants and coking facilities, and primary non-ferrous smelters. EPA has
undertaken special efforts to achieve compliance by these sources and con-
tinues to take actions to require owners and operators to bring their plants
into compliance with emission limitations. In general, these three source
categories have the most difficult air compliance problems because of the
amount of control required and the associated costs of the control techniques
that need to be applied. However, these industries account for about one-
third of the total emissions of particulates and about two-thirds of the
total point source emissions of sulfur dioxide; for this reason, compliance
by all of these sources is crucial to the attainment of the NAAQS in many
AQCRs.
Coal-Fired Power Plants
Control of emissions from power plants is essential to the attainment
of the health-related ambient air quality standards for SO in many areas
/\
of the nation. As a class, coal-fired steam electric plants emit about
half of the total SO produced by all sources. Three years ago it became
X
increasingly apparent to EPA that progress to meet applicable state SO
A
emission limitations by this sector of industry was lagging severely. At
that time, it was estimated that approximately 50 percent of the coal-fired
power plants in the nation were violating applicable SIP emission limitations,
Supplies of low-sulfur coal were reported to be insufficient to assure
nationwide compliance with SO regulations, and utilities were extremely
A
reluctant to use flue gas desulfurization (FGD) to remove SOV from stack
/\
emissions while burning high-sulfur coal.

15
-------
National public hearings were held in the fall of 1973 to determine
the validity of the utilities' contentions regarding alternate means of
compliance. After hearing testimony from a variety of expert witnesses
and other interested parties, the hearing panel concluded that the basic
technological problems associated with FGD had been solved or were within
the scope of current engineering and, further, that FGD could be applied
at a reasonable cost. At that time, 44 such systems were installed, under
construction, or planned around the country. As a measure of EPA's
effectiveness in cleaning up SO emissions from power plants, in less than
/\
three years this figure has more than doubled to A total of 113 plants, 27
of which are operational, 23 of which are under construction, and 63 of
which are in some stage of planning. These FGD-controlled units total
nearly 43,000 megawatts (MW) of generating capacity: that represents about
half the estimated FGD capacity needed to achieve full compliance with SO
A
regulations by 1980.
Accompanying this increased utilization of FGD, significant progress
has been made in improving S0£ compliance levels. Of the 406 coal-fired
power plants (producing approximately 150,000 MW) in this country, 41
(21,441 MW) are located in Ohio where a new SO plan has recently taken
J\
effect. Another 28 (12,311 MW) are situated in Indiana where a circuit
court recently vacated the SO plan, although the State Supreme Court has
/\
not yet ruled on the case. An additional 29 (15,109 MW) are in Illinois,
where portions of plans for both TSP and SO have been invalidated. Of the
X
remaining 308 plants (about 100,000 MW), 84 (50,000 MW) are known to be out
of compliance and 224 now comply with final emission limitations or abate-
ment schedules. Excluding the 98 plants of questionable status in the
three states mentioned above, the data represent a national compliance
level of 73 percent by number, but only about 50 percent by electrical
generating capacity.
Iron and Steel Mills/Coke Plants
The iron and steel inddstry presents one of the most difficult compliance
problems for state and Federal air pollution enforcement programs. There
are over 200 steel and coke-making installations in the United States, most
of which produce iron and steel (and may or may not produce coke), while
the remainder produce solely coke to be used in metallurgical and other -
16
-------
industries. Nearly all of these installations are located in areas where
the primary NAAQS are not expected to be attained.
Within steel facilities are a number of basic processes, each of which
presents tough technical problems to control. The processes that are the
greatest sources of air pollution in the industry are by-product coke
batteries, sinter lines, blast furnaces, open hearth furnaces, basic oxygen
furnaces, and electric arc furnaces. There are nearly 1,000 of these major
emitting steel processes; they characterize the basic means of producing
iron and steel and are the subject of intensifying EPA and state enforcement
attention. As indicated in Table II-3, the steel industry lags behind
other stationary sources in complying with SIP requirements; 30 percent of
the industry's 960 major polluting processes have yet to comply with SIP
emission limitations and/or compliance schedules while the level of non-
compliance for all major stationary source installations stands at seven
percent.
To spearhead enforcement activity, EPA has selected priority plants
based on individual size (emissions), potential for interregional impact,
and utilization of new technology. Monthly task force meetings are held
to coordinate enforcement actions and to track progress towards meeting
regulatory requirements.
Primary Non-Ferrous Smelters
Most of the Agency's problems in assuring compliance by the 27 non-
ferrous smelters in this country have centered in the western U.S., where
six SIPs for sulfur dioxide affecting 13 smelters were disapproved in
1972 as inadequate to meet the NAAQS. Regulations have been or soon will
be promulgated for all of these units. These regulations thus far have
resulted in three challenges under Section 307 of the Clean Air Act, the
initiation of a study on economic impact and technical feasibility, and
a temporary shutdown pending an appeal of a court decision. The promulgated
regulations require application of reasonably available control technology
and, if necessary, allow the interim use of supplementary control systems
(SCS) until adequate constant emission control techniques become available.
Each smelter using SCS is further required to conduct a research and
development program to hasten the evolution of such technology.
17
-------
Table II-3. STATUS OF COMPLIANCE WITH EMISSION LIMITATIONS
MAJOR POLLUTING STEEL PROCESSES VS ALL MAJOR STATIONARY SOURCE INSTALLATIONS3
SEPTEMBER 1976
MAJOR STEEL PROCESSES .
Coke Batteries
Sinter Lines
Blast Furnaces
Open Hearth Furnaces
Basic Oxygen Furnaces
Electric Arc Furnaces
TOTALS

All major stationary
source installations'5
TOTAL
NUMBER ,
218
55
191
139
66
291
960

21,930
STATUS WITH RESPECT TO EMISSION
LIMITS AND/OR COMPLIANCE SCHEDULES
IN COMPLIANCE .
99
42
140
80
40
236
637 (66%)

19,833 (90%)
IN VIOLATION .
116
13
48
52
21
41
291 (30%)

1,611 ( 7%)
UNKNOWN STATUS
3
0
3
7
5
14
32 (3%)

486 (2%)
00
aThis comparison shows the compliance status of the steel industry in the most favorable
light, since the compliance status of individual processes within steel facilities is being
compared to the status of total installations with major potential air pollution problems (the
source of the stationary source compliance figures is the EPA formal reporting system; under
this system a facility having several processes, only one of which is in violation or of unknown
status, must be classified as in violation or unknown as a whole).

bFacilities individually capable of emitting over 100 tons of a pollutant each year.
-------
Regarding the S(L compliance status of the remaining 14 units: new
regulations have recently been proposed or promulgated for three; there
is no applicable regulation for three others; two are operating under consent
orders; SIP revisions have been requested involving two additional smelters;
two others are operating in compliance; and the remaining two units are under
state enforcement actions (one is constructing a new acid plant while the
other has been shut down).
Nine of the 27 smelters currently operating are in compliance with TSP
emission limits or abatement schedules; seven are under continuing study by
a state or region; five are challenging the applicable regulation; three
are under consent orders; and the remaining units have recently completed
construction of new facilities which are believed to be in compliance.
NEW SOURCE REVIEW
Pursuant to the authority of the Clean Air Act, requirements have been
developed for the preconstruction review of specified new or modified
stationary sources of air pollution. Provisions for a preconstruction re-
view are defined for the following situations:
(1) to prevent the construction or modification of a stationary
source that would interfere with the attainment and maintenance
of national ambient air quality standards (SSR);
(2) to prevent the construction or modification of a source that
would cause significant deterioration of air quali.ty (PSD);
(3) to prevent the construction or modification of a source that
would emit a hazardous air pollutant in excess of a prescribed
limitation (NESHAP); and
(4) to provide technical consultation, upon request, to advise
whether the source will comply with standards of performance
for new sources when in operation (NSPS).
The first two preconstruction review requirements were intended under
the Clean Air Act to be part of the legally enforceable SIP. To date, all
but five states have procedures completely approved by EPA to prevent new
sources from interfering with the attainment and maintenance of ambient
standards. Most provisions of the five partially approved programs were
also approved and are being implemented by the states or local agencies.
19
-------
The.requirements for Federal PSD regulations originated from litigation
by the Sierra Club. EPA was consequently under a restrictive time schedule
to promulgate regulations and had no time for the normal process of first
publishing 40 CFR Part 51 guidance. As a result, all state plans were
initially disapproved for PSD. Federal regulations are still in effect for
all states (North Dakota will soon have the first approved PSD plan).
Implementation of the Federal promulgation similarly rests at the regional
level for all states except Georgia which has been delegated this authority.
The Clean Air Act places the program responsibility for NSPS and NESHAP
with EPA. EPA has developed and continues to develop emission and/or equip-
ment standards in these areas for new or modified stationary sources. The
review responsibility can be delegated and has been in the case of 24 states.
These delegations, however, are often partial ones since most states do
not want the review of all NSPS source types (current and future) and cannot
make their regulations apply to sources retroactively.
The implementation of the four NSR requirements has therefore been
carried out by different groups and has lacked the advantages of a consoli-
dated program. Even where EPA or the state has program authority for more
than one of the reviews, different groups within the state or region are
often involved with their implementation.
In March 1976, EPA distributed guidelines to the Regions to recommend
that a consolidated approach to preconstruction reviews of new sources be
taken by the Regions until states have adopted their own legally enforceable
procedures and/or been delegated EPA authority. Shortly thereafter,
guidance for the delegation of NSR authority to state and local agencies
was also distributed.
During the first half of calendar year 1976, the Regions used this
guidance to:
(1) develop an interim program to review new sources for PSD and
coordinate it with other regional and state programs involving
NSR where possible, and
(2) emphasize and encourage states to take complete responsibility
for the NSR. (Table II-4 summarizes their success to date).
As states assume greater roles in the actual implementation of NSR
responsibilities, regional resources now devoted to actual new source review
20
-------
Table II-4J CURRENT STATUS OF NSR
PROGRAM RESPONSIBILITIES
Region
I

III

Connecticut
Maine
Massachusetts
New Hampshire
Rhode Island
Vermont
New Jersey
New York
Puerto Rico
Virgin Islands
Dist. of Columbia
Delaware
Maryland
Pennsylvania
Virginia
West Virginia
Alabama
Florida
Georgia
Kentucky
Mississippi
North Carolina
South Carolina
Tennessee
NSPS
D
D
D
D
I
D
N
D
N
D
-
N
-
N
D
I
D
-
D
N
N
D
N
N
NESHAP
D
D
D
D
I
D
N
D
N
D
-
N
-
N
D
I
D
-
D
N
N
D
N
N
PSD SSR
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
I A
A
A
I A
A
A
A
D A
N A
N A
N A
N A
N A
A - Adopted state regulations; D
N - Negotiating for authority; I
21
Delegated EPA authority
Interested in requesting
authority
-------
Table II-4 (continued). CURRENT STATUS OF NSR
PROGRAM RESPONSIBILITIES
Region
V

VII

VIII

Illinois
Indiana
Michigan
Minnesota
Ohio
Wisconsin
Arkansas
Louisiana
New Mexico
Oklahoma
Texas
Iowa
Kansas
Nebraska
Missouri
Colorado
Montana
North Dakota
South Dakota
Utah
Wyoming
NSPS
N
D
D
N
D
N
-
N
-
N
N
D
I
D
N
D
I
D *
D
D
N
NESHAP
N
D
D
N
I
N
-
N
-
N
N
N
-
N
-
D
I
I
-
N
-
PSD
-
I
I
-
-
I
-
-
-
I
-
-
-
N
-
I
I
N
I
-
I
SSR
A
-
A *
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
-
A
*Action pending
A - Adopted state regulations;
N - Negotiating for authority;
D - Delegated EPA authority
I - Interested in requesting
authority
-------
Table II-4 (continued). CURRENT STATUS OF NSR
PROGRAM RESPONSIBILITIES
Region
IX Arizona
California
Hawaii
Nevada
Guam
American Samoa
X Alaska
Idaho
Oregon
Washington
NSPS
I
D **
I
I
-
-
-
D
D
D
NESHAP
I
D **
I
-
-
-
-
-
D
D
PSD
-
I
-
-
-
-
-
I
I
N
SSR
-
N
A
-
A
A
A
A
A
A

TOTALS:
Adopted State Regulations
Negotiating for Authority
Delegated EPA Authority
Interested in Requesting
Authority

16
24

17
17

8
1

50
1

**14 delegations to local governments

A - Adopted state regulations; D - Delegated EPA authority
N - Negotiating for authority; I - Interested in requesting
authority
23
-------
may be shifted to overseeing state and local NSR programs. Consequently,
Regions will be involved with general program audits, guidance for state
program coordination, and will be providing technical support to states
during difficult review situations. Future headquarters guidance will be
directed toward this type of regional role.
SULFUR DIOXIDE EMISSION REGULATIONS
Since January 1975, several states have proposed changes to their
emission limitations for sources of sulfur dioxide (S02). These actions
have included deletion of requirements that some S02 sources meet the next
increment of S02 reduction set forth in the State Implementation Plan,
postponement of the date by which subject sources must meet a tightened
emission limit, and establishment of less restrictive emission limits for
SOn sources which may result in actual emission increases.
In general, the S02 emission regulation revision efforts were directed
toward major fuel burning installations and electric utilities in particular.
There are three factors which undoubtedly affected decisions by the states
to revise their regulations. First and foremost was the limited quantity
and high cost of low sulfur fuels. In an attempt to minimize the impact on
air quality from a shortage of low sulfur fuel EPA established a Clean
Fuel Policy (1972) which encouraged those states which could safely switch
to alternate fuels to do so and thus make the limited quantity low sulfur
fuels available in areas which needed such fuels to attain and maintain the
National Ambient Air Quality Standards. Subsequent to the Clean Fuels Policy
the Energy Supply and Environmental Coordination Act was passed by Congress
in 1974.
The second factor affecting state decisions to modify S02 emission
standards was the general economic instability which occurred during this
period. The rapid rise in the cost of low sulfur fuel coupled with an
anticipated increase in unemployment resulting from the phase-out of high
sulfur fuel production facilities precipitated state action to modify
standards so that local or less expensive fuels could be used.
A third factor was the realization by many states that their regulations
were more restrictive than needed to attain and maintain the National
Ambient Air Quality Standards for sulfur dioxide.

24
-------
The general policy on relaxation of sulfur dioxide emission regulations
is:
1. The basis for approval must be whether the national primary standard
will be attained and maintained in accordance with the Clean Air Act. The
secondary standard must be attained within a reasonable time.
2. EPA will cooperate with national energy programs to the fullest
extent possible consistent with the timely attainment and maintenance of
standards, although the Agency is concerned about possible increases in
ambient sulfate levels.
.From January 1975 through October 1976, twelve states submitted fifteen
proposed SIP revisions which would relax SC^ regulations for power plants.
During the same period nine of those SIP revisions have been approved.
Table II-5 lists those states involved in SIP actions which have resulted
in relaxation of emission limits for power plants.

AIR QUALITY MONITORING
Standing Air Monitoring Work Group (SAMWG)
In September 1975, the Deputy Administrator of EPA directed that a stand-
ing group be created to perform an in-depth review of air quality monitoring
activities conducted by EPA and state and local agencies pursuant to
regulations -issued under the Clean Air Act. Representation included all
EPA offices involved with monitoring, plus state and local control agency
representatives.
The goal of the SAMWG is to conduct a comprehensive review of the State
Implementation Plan air monitoring activities, both ambient and source.
The objective of the study is to identify priority monitoring issues for
presentation in decision papers for agency approval and subsequent changes.
In addition, a five-year monitoring strategy guideline will be developed.
The approach of the study is to identify adequate levels of air quality
data for priority air pollution control programs with minimum resource
allocation.
25
-------
Table II-5.
S02 CONTROL REGULATION RELAXATION FOR POWER PLANTS
ro
State
Alabama
District of
Columbia
Florida
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Maryland
Proposal
Date
1/13/76
6/29/76
8/15/75
5/2/75
2/24/76
12/16/75
1/30/75
Approval
Date
Pending
Pending
4/19/76
Pending
Pending
5/10/76
12/5/75
Nature of Revision
Certain counties were reclassified so that emission limits
for sources in those counties could be relaxed from 1.8
to 4. Ibs. S02/106 BTU heat input.
Delays requirement for reducing sulfur in fuel from 1.0%
to 0.5% until one year after EPA approval.
Relaxes sulfur content of solid and liquid fuels for
different sources and areas of the state depending on con-
centration of sources and ambient S02 levels.
The new regulation, by source size and county, relaxes
limitations for certain counties.
Emission limits for solid fuel burning equipment relaxed
to 6.0 Ibs. S02/1Q6 BTU after 7/31/75 and 5.0 Ibs S02/106
BTU after 7/31/78. Emission limits for liquid fuel burn-
ing equipment relaxed to 2.5 Ibs S02/1Q6 BTU.
Sulfur content of fuels relaxed for some sources and areas
and tightened for others according to local problems.
Permanent elimination of requirement to change from 1% to
Maryland
10/6/75
3/1/76
.5% sulfur residual fuel oils for entire state except
Baltimore AQCR where elimination is for 1 year.

Relaxes sulfur content of solid fuels from 1 to 2.1% and
residual fuel oils from 1 to 2% for entire state except
Baltimore and National Capital AQCRs.
Maryland
7/29/76
Pending
Permanent elimination of requirement to change from 1%
to .5% sulfur residual fuel oils for Baltimore AQCR.
-------
Table II-5 {continued). S02 CONTROL REGULATION RELAXATION FOR POWER PLANTS
ro
State
Massachusetts
Mew Jersey
Proposal
Date
10/7/75
5/21/76
Approval
Date
12/5/75
7/12/76
Nature of Revision
Sulfur content of fuel requirements for Boston Air
Control District relaxed until July 1, 1977.
Relaxes, until 6 months after EPA approval, sulfur

Pollution
in fuel
New Jersey
New York
7/29/76
5/25/76
Pennsylvania 5/10/76
10/1/76

7/20/76
limitations for facilities in Salem, Cumberland, and Cape
May Counties.

Relaxes, until 6 months after EPA approval, sulfur in fuel
limitations for one source in Cumberland County.

Relaxes until May 31, 1977 sulfur in fuel limitations for
three power plants in Suffolk and Oswego Counties.

Delays until 10/1/76 the requirement to lower the allow-
able sulfur content of fuel oil from .5 to .3%.
Virgin Islands 5/13/76
7/12/76
Relaxes sulfur in fuel limitations to 2.0% for St. Thomas
and St. John and 1.5% for St. Croix.
-------
In January 1976, SAMWG developed specific plans for carrying out these
objectives. Ten issue/decision papers are being developed:
1. Evaluation of the Need for Tape Sampler Instruments
2. General Background Paper on Air Monitoring
3. Strategy Issues for Improved SC^ Monitoring
4. Strategy Issues for Improved HC-03 Monitoring-
5. Ambient Monitoring for Point Sources
6. Strategy Issues for Improved N02 Monitoring
7. Strategy Issues for Improved CO Monitoring
8. Non-Criteria;Pollutant Monitoring -- General Strategy
9. Strategy Issues for Improved TSP Monitoring
10. Flow and Handling of Air Quality Data
In addition to work on these papers, SAMWG has developed regional,
state, and local program guidance for FY 1977 and FY 1977 program guidance
for EPA headquarters.
Monitoring Data
Tables II-6, 7, and 8 reflect the status of data for calendar
year 1975 which has been successfully incorporated into the National Air
Data Bank, as of September 14, 1976.
Table II-6 lists, by state, the numbers of TSP, N02, hydrocarbon,
oxidant, CO, and S02 sites at which monitoring was conducted during 1975,
as evidenced by the submittal of any_ data to EPA through September 14, 1976,
All states and jurisdictions except American Samoa have submitted data for
at least one pollutant. The numbers of sites will be slightly larger than
the numbers of actual monitors in use as a consequence of relocating some
equipment during the calendar year. Both the old site and the new site
contribute to the count, even though a single instrument has produced both
sets of data. The number of such moves is not known-- possibly in the
neighborhood of 5% of the totals, nationally.
The total numbers of reporting sites are beginning to stabilize in
1975. During the early '70s, when many state and local networks were being
established, the numbers of monitoring sites were increasing substantially
from year to year (Table II-7).
28
-------
Table 11-6. MONITORING SITES REPORTING DATA
(1975)
State
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
TSP
90
24
68
54
92
80
83
18
9
157
65
14
36
166
111
51
63
125
35
32
79
67
140
78
31
57
53
48
40
31
66
71
304
145
32
326
71
49
144
17
22
N02
25
2
15
22
96
4
48
1
6
67
34
22
1
99
76
17
50
122
21
3
70
58
35
22
3
19
15
15
2
12
13
2
24
122
9
149
22
2
34
5
29
Total
hydro-
carbons
3
1
3
0
55
6
1
0
0
8
1
0
0
2
0
0
0
5
0
0
7
0
0
0
0
11
1
0
1
0
4
0
10
0
0
4
0
2
0
0
0
Oxidant
7
1
11
0
112
6
17
0
3
14
1
1
0
31
6
7
7
11
7
1
11
21
4
10
4
20
7
2
5
3
8
5
16
3
0
29
4
4
30
0
2
CO
7
5
14
0
72
8
13
0
2
11
2
1
1
18
5
3
8
13
2
1
13
10
9
7
0
11
4
3
4
3
22
11
29
1
0
15
3
6
32
0
2
so2
44
7
29
18
75
8
70
17
3
106
46
13
10
148
91
30
50
142
25
33
75
82
60
45
21
21
39
18
3
17
32
42
167
125
9
188
32
14
60
15
28
29
-------
Table II-6 (continued). MONITORING SITES REPORTING DATA
(1975)

State
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Guam
Virgin Islands

TSP
75
23
107
115
28
13
166
64
48
122
47
3
5

N02
59
3
107
95
8
0
15
4
2
30
6
4
0
Total
hydro-
carbons
0
0
0
12
0
0
0
0
0
8
0
0
0

Oxidant
3
0
12
14
7
1
19
6
1
15
0
0
0

CO
3
0
8
13
6
2
12
10
0
18
0
0
0

so2
69
8
72
100
22
4
87
33
36
72
10
4
4
Total 4060 1726 145 509 443 2579
(No data - American Samoa)
30
-------
Table I1-7. NUMBERS OF SITES AT WHICH MONITORING HAS BEEN CONDUCTED,
1970-1975
TSP S02 CO Ox N02
1970 1283 403 73 51 S

1971 2044 729 133 82 £
-o
1972 2975 1311 191 162 ij

1973 3762 2008 299 265 S

1974 4281 2555 433 431 1537

1975 4060 2579 443 509 1726
31
-------
Table II-8 lists, by state, the numbers of TSP, N02, hydrocarbon,
oxidant, CO and S02 sites for which sufficiently complete data have been
reported for the year to afford the calculation of a statistically representative
annual mean. This criterion is primarily relevant to those polutants having
a standard based on the annual mean - TSP, S02, and N02. Although the
annual mean of data from a CO monitor is not of critical interest, substantial
blocks of missing data can preclude conclusive statements about the prevalence
of violations or the certainty of compliance. The same could be contended
for oxidant/ozone monitors except that strong seasonality renders the expecta-
tion of violations extremely small in some areas during the winter months.
Accordingly, several northeastern states schedule monitoring only during the
warmer months when measurable oxidant levels occur; thus by design they do
not collect a complete year's data for this pollutant.
The District of Columbia, Nevada, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and American
Samoa are absent from Table II-8 indicating that the EPA data bank con-
tained no complete 1975 data for any pollutant from these areas as of
mid-September, 1976.

AIR POLLUTION EPISODES
In the period January 1, 1976, to June 30, 1976, there were 111 air
pollution episodes in 12 states in 6 EPA regions. Seventy-eight episodes
were recorded in California alone. High oxidant/ozone levels were
responsible for 91 of the total episodes. The remainder of the air pollution
episodes were scattered among TSP, CO, S02, and TSPxS02. Table 11-9 summarizes
the number and type of air pollution episodes by EPA regions and states.
CONTROL AGENCY SUPPORT

At the end of FY 76 resources for all state and local control agencies,
including those not receiving any Federal support, totaled approximately
7,500 man-years and $157.2 million. The Federal Government contributed
approximately $55.2 million (35 percent of the monetary resources) through
Federal program grant assistance, Federal assignees, and special demonstration
grants and contract assistance.
32
-------
Table 11-8. MONITORING SITES REPORTING DATA
MEETING ANNUAL SUMMARY CRITERIA (1975)
State
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
TSP
11
15
46
41
60
55
51
13
8
55
10
17
138
73
46
49
94
20
14
64
39
98
63
21
45
16
36
30
4
26
8
127
13
237
1
46
3
15
71
1
97
N02
7
1
0
1
51
2
31
0
4
31
0
0
56
38
5
34
104
0
2
51
47
23
16
1
1
1
8
10
0
0
0
88
0
85
3
2
0
14
47
1
34
Total
hydro-
carbons
0
0
0
0
40
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
Oxidant
0
0
1
0
71
5
0
0
3
1
0
0
5
0
3
2
5
0
0
0
9
0
1
2
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
7
0
3
0
0
2
0
5
CO
1
3
5
0
56
5
2
0
1
1
0
0
3
0
2
6
8
0
1
0
8
7
5
0
1
0
2
1
0
1
0
0
0
7
2
3
0
2
0
0
2
so2
7
4
6
15
29
5
31
7
5
34
8
5
78
40
20
36
104
12
17
50
59
45
33
12
3
6
8
14
8
20
7
92
2
108
2
9
3
15
53
1
47
33
-------
Table II-8 (continued). MONITORING SITES REPORTING DATA
MEETING ANNUAL SUMMARY CRITERIA (1975)

State
Total
hydro-
TSP N02 carbons Oxidant CO S02
Texas 60 14 1 7 0 52
Utah 12 4 0 446
Vermont 80 0 000
Washington 56 3 0 66 12
West Virginia 33 0 0 0 0 23
Wisconsin 51 2 0 5 5 26
Wyoming 18 1 0 004
Guam 34 0 004
Virgin Islands 40 0 000

Total 2122 827 49 150 150 1187

(Incomplete data: American Samoa, District of Columbia, Nevada, Pennsylvania,
Virginia)
34
-------
Table II-9. SUMMARY OF AIR POLLUTION EPISODES FOR
JANUARY THROUGH JUNE 1976
Area
Region I
Connecticut
Entire state
Fairfield Co.
New Haven Co.
Pollutantb Jan
Ox 0
0 0
0* 0
#
Feb
0
0
0
of Episodes3
Mar April May
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
June
1
1
1
Region II
None reported for any pollutant

Region IIIC
None reported for any pollutant

Region IV
Alabama
Jefferson Co.
Kentucky
Cambell , Canton, and
Boone Co's.

Region V
Illinois
Madison Co.
Chicago

Indiana
Floyd and Clark Co's.
TSP
O
O
O
Ohio
Belmont, Columbiana,
Jefferson, and Monroe Co's. TSPxS02
Cleveland TSPxS02
Miami and Montgomery Co. Ox
Lawrence Co. TSP
Cincinnati Ox
Cleveland Ox
Dayton Ox
Youngstdwn Ox

Wisconsin
Southeast District Ov
0 0
0 0
1 1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ld
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
2
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
0 0
35
-------
Table II-9 (continued) SUMMARY OF AIR POLLUTION EPISODES
FOR JANUARY THROUGH JUNE 1976
# of Episodes9
Area Pollutant'3 Jan Feb Mar April May June
Region VI
None reported for any pollutant

Region VII
None reported for any pollutant

Region VIII
Colorado
Denver CO 100000

Utah
Magna S02 ld 0 0 0 0 0

Region IX
California6
Los Angeles Co. Ox 0 0 0 1 10 13d
Orange Co. Ox 0 0 0 1 5 4
Western San Bernadino Co. Ox 0 2 2 0 9 13
Western Riverside Co. Ox 000058
Eastern Riverside Co.f Ox 00001 2
Los Angeles Co. CO 200000

Region X
Alaska
Fairbanks CO 110000
Idaho
Boise
Kellogg

CO
S02

1
0

0
1

0
0

0
0
If not otherwise indicated, episodes are for the Alert stage.

Ox = oxidant/ozone
T§P = total suspended particulate
CO = carbon monoxide
SOp = sulfur dioxide
TSPxS02 = the numerical product of the concentrations of TSP and S02-

cRegion III reports Warning and Emergency Stage episodes only.

Warning stage was attained.

eEach day of episodic levels is tallied as a distinct episode in
California.
f
Portion of Riverside Co. outside the Los Angeles Air Quality Control Region.

36
-------
In these agencies approximately 6800 man-years and $152.2 million
are used in the traditional operational air pollution control programs.
The remainder of the man-years and dollars are expended by non-federally
supported~control agencies mainly in the area of local compliance by minor
sources and in some instances in research and development in areas such as
ambient air monitoring and development of inspection/maintenance programs.
The resources needed to maintain and attain standards have continued
to outstrip existing manpower and dollar availability. In those agencies
primarily responsible for SIP accomplishment which receive some Federal
government support, estimates indicate that needs approximating 10,300
man-years and $210 million now exist for FY 1977. These estimates were
provided by the states in 1973 and reflect a minimal increase over
estimates for 1975, provided at the same time, of 9500 man-years and
$192 million. Predictive methods (based on manpower models developed in
1967 and 1975) also indicate that resource needs now are in the range of
10,000 man-years.
The 1977 resource estimates indicate increases necessary to assist
areas with problems in attaining national ambient air quality standards,
new source reviews, and controls related to automotive pollutants. These
resources are not only allocated to help state and local agencies with
traditional monitoring and enforcement programs but also to develop
increasingly complex control programs affected by energy tradeoffs,
social and economic considerations, and long-range transport of air
pollutants such as photochemical oxidants. In addition, the control
agencies will be developing long-term attainment and maintenance plans
that may include strategies for control of minor sources and non-traditional
sources such as industrial fugitive emissions and urban reentrainment
as well as strategies associated with transportation and land use.
At the end of FY 1976, state and local control agencies had available
approximately 66 percent of the manpower and 73 percent of the funds stated
as being needed by 1977. Since 1973, the amount of Federal dollars
available has remained relatively constant at approximately 51.5 million,
with the 1976 allocation receiving a slight increase to $55.2 million and
with the 1977 budget anticipated to increase to $55.5 million. Total
37
-------
funding increased over 1975 by approximately 6 percent ($9.2 million) and
man-years of effort increased by 4 percent. These increases were approxi-
mately 50 percent of the increases experienced for each of the two
previous years.
REFERENCES
1. SIP Progress Report, January 1 to June 30, 1975, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, EPA-450/2-75-008, September 1975.
38
-------
III. STATE PROFILES

INTRODUCTION
This section presents, in a state-by-state format, information on
attainment of national ambient air quality standards, SIP development,
resources, source compliance and enforcement activities. Data are presented
primarily in a series of tables. States are arranged by EPA Region. No
attempt is made to provide a comparative analysis of any state's program
and progress in relation to the activities of any other state.
Table A presents for each state the attainment status of each AQCR or
interstate portion of AQCR for TSP, S02> CO, Oxidant and N02- These tables
are based on information provided by EPA Regional Offices as of September
15, 1976. The tables indicate attainment, SIP revision for attainment and
maintenance, SIP revision for maintenance only, and non-attainment with no
call for a SIP revision.
Table B is a summary of the status, as published in the Federal
Register, of three portions of each state's SIP: regulations for review of
new stationary sources, transportation control measures, and emission
limitations for TSP, S02, HC and ML. The status of emission limitations
is given for stationary sources and does not include any transportation
control measures.
Table C compares resources needed in FY 77 (based on SIP projections)
to resources actually available for FY 1976. The comparison is given for
both man-years and dollars. The projected resource needs are derived from
data provided by Regional Offices in December 1973 that reflect revisions
to implementation plans which generally require additional manpower. These
estimates have not necessarily been formally submitted as resource revisions
to the SIPs. Additional manpower is needed for such plan revisions as
transportation controls, new source review programs, air quality maintenance
39
-------
plan development, significant deterioration activities, and the additional
monitoring and evaluation requirements.
Man-years are in terms of equivalent man-years estimated by Regions
from program information and agency inquiries and are based on the projected
number of budgeted and on-board positions that would be available in 1976.
Dollar amounts incorporate state and local funds (including state funds to
local agencies) as well as federal funds for state and local agency grants.
These amounts do not include federal support to states from other sources
such as contract and research funds and associated non-federal expenditures.
Table D gives the compliance status of major installations (facilities
capable of emitting over 100 tons of a pollutant each year) in each state
and a summary of enforcement actions taken by state and local agencies.
40
-------
EPA REGION I
CONNECTICUT
MAINE
MASSACHUSETTS
NEW HAMPSHIRE
RHODE ISLAND
VERMONT
41
-------
TABLE A

CONNECTICUT
Attainment Status of National Ambient Air Quality Standards

by Air Quality Control Region
^ ^_ Pollutant
AQCR — ^^^^
041 . Eastern Connecticut
042. Hartford-New Haven-Springfiel
Interstate (Conn, portion)
043. New Jersey -New York-Conn.
Interstate (Conn, portion)
044. Northwestern Connecticut
TSP

d
AR

so2

Ox
AR
AR

AR
AR
N02

"X" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS, but no call for
a SIP revision.

"AR" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS and a call for
a SIP revision for attainment and maintenance.

"MR" indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS, however, a SIP
revision for maintenance is necessary.

A blank indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS and no calls for
SIP revisions.
42
-------
CONNECTICUT

Table B. STATUS'OF SELECTED PORTIONS OF THE

STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SIP Portion
Status
New Source Review-
Transportation Measures
Indirect source review regulation
approved on 2/13/76.

Measures are required for Hartford-
New Haven-Springfield AQCR and New
York-New Jersey-Connecticut AQCRs.
Emission Limitations
Approved
Section 51.13 only because PSD is disapproved nationwide. See
section on new-source review in SIP Overview for more details.
Table C. COMPARISON.OF FY 1977 PROJECTED NEEDS AND

ACTUAL FY 1976 RESOURCES
Resources
Resource needs projected for FY 1977
Actual resources available in FY 1976
Man-years
271
131
Dollars (xlO3)
$5,386
2,851
43
-------
CONNECTICUT
Table D. SUMMARY OF STATE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY (June 30, 1976)'
MAJOR INSTALLATIONS
(Facilities capable
of emitting over
100 tons of a pol-
lutant each year)
237
Status with respect to emission
limits and/or compliance schedules
In compliance
219
In violation
17
Unknown
1
INVESTIGATIONS OF COMPLIANCE STATUS 97/1/75 to 6/30/76)
T! Formal written inquiries
2. Field investigations
TOTAL
CASE DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS (7/1/75 to 6/30/76)
Ti Notices/citations of violation issued —
2. Administrative orders issued ,
3. Civil/criminal proceedings initiated
TOTAL
1,700
2,106

3,806
1,165
79
1,259
'Formal Reporting System - State Activity Report,"
EPA Office of Planning and Management,
Program Reporting Division, June 30, 1976.
Number represent state and local enforcement activity.
44
-------
TABLE A

MAINE
Attainment Status of National Ambient Air Quality Standards

by Air Quality Control Region
" -^_ Pollutant
AQCR ' ^^_^^
107. Androscoggin Valley Interstat
(Maine portion)
108. Aroostock
109. Down East
110. Metropolitan Portland
111 . Northwest Maine
TSP
a
AR

so2

N02

"X" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS, but no call for
a SIP revision.

"AR" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS and a call for
a SIP revision for attainment and maintenance.

"MR" indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS, however, a SIP
revision for maintenance is necessary.

A blank indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS and no calls for
SIP revisions.
45
-------
MAINE
Table. B. STATUS OF SELECTED PORTIONS OF THE
STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SIP Portion
Status
New Source Review
Approved
Transportation Measures
Emission Limitations
None required

Approved
Section 51.18 only because PSD is disapproved nationwide. See
section on new source review in SIP Overview for more details.
Table C. COMPARISON OF FY 1977 PROJECTED NEEDS AND
ACTUAL FY 1976 RESOURCES
Resources
Resource needs projected for FY 1977
Actual resources available in FY 1976
Man-years
42
23
Dollars (xlO3)
$816
$386
46
-------
MAINE

Table -D. SUMMARY OF STATE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY (June 30, 1976)'
MAJOR INSTALLATIONS
(Facilities capable
of -emitting over
100 tons of a pol-
lutant each year)
147
Status with respect to emission
limits and/or compliance schedules
In compliance
105
In violation
26
Unknown
16
INVESTIGATIONS OF COMPLIANCE STATUS 97/1/75 to 6/30/76)
TT Formal written inquiries... 239
2. Field investigations 189
TOTAL
CASE DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS (7/1/75 to 6/30/76)
1. Notices/citations of violation issued...
2. Administrative orders issued
3. Civil/criminal proceedings initiated....
TOTAL
a"Formal Reporting System - State Activity Report,"
EPA Office of Planning and Management,
Program Reporting Division, .June 30, 1976.
Number represent state and local enforcement activity.
428
1
3
3
47
-------
TABLE A

MASSACHUSETTS
Attainment Status of National Ambient Air Quality Standards

by Air Quality Control Region
" -~~ ^_ Pollutant
AQCR — "^~-~-^
042. Hartford-New Haven-Spring-
field (Mass, portion)
117. Berkshire
118. Central Massachusetts
119. Metropolitan Boston
120. Metropolitan Providence
Interstate (Mass, portion)
121. Merrimac Valley-South New
Hampshire Interstate
(Mass, portion)
TSP

MR
AR
AR
AR

MR
so2

MR
MR

MR
CO

AR
AR

AR
Ox

AR
AR
AR
AR

AR
N02

"X" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS, but no call for
a SIP revision.

"AR" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS and a call for
a SIP revision for attainment and maintenance.

"MR" indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS, however, a SIP
revision for maintenance is necessary.

A blank indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS and no calls for
SIP revisions.
48
-------
MASSACHUSETTS

Table B. STATUS OF SELECTED PORTIONS OF THE

STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SIP Portion
Status
New Source Review
Approved
Transportation Measures
Emission Limitations
Removal of court suspension of TCP
regulations on 3/10/76 for Metro.
Boston AQCR.

Promulgation for S02 (12/75-sulfur
content of fuel), approved for other
pollutants.
aSection 51.18 only because PSD is disapproved nationwide. See
section on new source review in SIP Overview for more details.
Table C. COMPARISON OF FY 1977 PROJECTED NEEDS AND

ACTUAL FY 1976 RESOURCES
Resources
Resource needs projected for FY 1977
Actual resources available in FY 1976
Man-years
189
126
Dollars (xlO3)
$3,090
1,854
49
-------
MASSACHUSETTS

Table D. SUMMARY OF STATE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY (June 30, 1976)'
MAJOR INSTALLATIONS
(Facilities capable
of emitting over
100 tons of a pol-
lutant each year).
561
Status with respect to emission
limits and/or compliance schedules
In compliance
511
In violation
39
Unknown
11
INVESTIGATIONS OF COMPLIANCE STATUS 97/1/75 to 6/30/76)
T Formal written inquiries ... 3,477
2. Field investigations.. 4,866
TOTAL
CASE DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS (7/1/75 to 6/30/76)
Ti Notices/citations of violation issued —
2. Administrative orders issued... ,
3. Civil/criminal proceedings initiated
TOTAL
8,343
1,937
13
1,962
"Formal Reporting System - State Activity Report,"
EPA Office of Planning and Management,
Program Reporting Division, June 30, 1976.
Number represent state and local enforcement activity.
50
-------
TABLE A
NEW HAMPSHIRE
Attainment Status of National Ambient Air Quality Standards

by Air Quality Control Region
~~~~~~-~-«-^^_ Pollutant
AQCR ^~^^^— _
107. Androscoggin Valley Interstat
(New Hampshire portion)
121. Merrimac Valley -Southern
New Hampshire Interstate
(New Hampshire portion)
149. New Hampshire
TSP
3
AR

so2

CO
AR

NOz

1,,
X" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS, but no call for
a SIP revision.

"AR" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS and a call for
a SIP revision for attainment and maintenance.

"MR" indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS, however, a SIP
revision for maintenance is necessary.

A blank indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS and no calls for
SIP revisions.
51
-------
NEW HAMPSHIRE

Table B. STATUS OF SELECTED PORTIONS OF THE

STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SIP Portion
Status
New Source Review
Approved
Transportation Measures
None required
Emission Limitations
Promulgation for TSP (11/75),
approved for other pollutants
Section 51.18 only because PSD is disapproved nationwide. See
section on new source review in SIP Overview for more details.
Table C. COMPARISON OF FY 1977 PROJECTED NEEDS AND

ACTUAL FY 1976 RESOURCES
Resources
Resource needs projected for FY 1977
Actual resources available in FY 1976
Man-years
29
22
Dollars (xlO3)
$435
300
52
-------
NEW HAMPSHIRE
Table D. SUMMARY OF STATE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY (June 30, 1976)'
MAJOR INSTALLATIONS
(Facilities capable
of emitting over
100 tons of a pol-
lutant each year)
66
Status with respect to emission
limits and/or compliance schedules
In compliance
63
In violation
2
Unknown
1
INVESTIGATIONS OF COMPLIANCE STATUS 97/1/75 to 6/30/76)
T! Formal written inquiries
2. Field investigations
TOTAL
CASE DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS (7/1/75 to 6/30/76)
T! Notices/citations of violation issued —
2. Administrative orders issued
3. Civil/criminal proceedings initiated
TOTAL
6
210

216
44
11
3

58
Formal Reporting System - State Activity Report,"
EPA Office of Planning and Management,
Program Reporting Division, June 30, 1976.
Number represent state and local enforcement activity.
53
-------
TABLE A

RHODE ISLAND
Attainment Status of National Ambient Air Quality Standards

by Air Quality Control Region
AQCR
Pollutant
TSP
SO,
CO
N02
120. Metropolitan Providence
Interstate (R.I. portion)
AR
MR
AR
AR
"X" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS, but no call for
a SIP revision.

"AR" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS and a call for
a SIP revision for attainment and maintenance.

"MR" indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS, however, a SIP
revision for maintenance is necessary.

A blank indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS and no calls for
.SIP revisions.
54
-------
RHODE ISLAND
Table B. STATUS OF SELECTED PORTIONS OF THE
STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SIP Portion
Status
New Source Review
Approved
Transportation Measures Measures required; hearing 11/75
Emission Limitations
Approved
Section 51.18 only because PSD is disapproved nationwide. See
section on new source review in SIP Overview for more details.
Table C. COMPARISON OF FY 1977 PROJECTED NEEDS AND
ACTUAL FY 1976 RESOURCES
Resources
Resource needs projected for FY 1977
Actual resources available in FY 1976
Man-years
28
18
Dollars (xlO3)
$323
318
55
-------
RHODE ISLAND

Table D. SUMMARY OF STATE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY (June 30, 1976)*
MAJOR INSTALLATIONS.
(Facilities capable
of emitting over
100 tons of a pol-
lutant each year)
73
Status with respect to emission
limits and/or compliance schedules
In compliance
66
In violation
5
Unknown
2
INVESTIGATIONS OF COMPLIANCE STATUS 97/1/75 to 6/30/76)
T Formal written inquiries 151
2. Field investigations 223
TOTAL
CASE DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS (7/T/75 to 6/30/76)
T Notices/citations of violation issued —
2. Administrative orders issued.
3. Civil/criminal proceedings initiated
TOTAL
374
8
5
J_

14
"Formal Reporting System - State Activity Report,"
EPA Office of Planning and Management,
Program Reporting Division, June 30, 1976.
Number represent state and local enforcement activity.
56
-------
TABLE A

VERMONT
Attainment Status of National Ambient Air Quality Standards
by Air Quality Control Region
AQCR
Pollutant
TSP
SO,
CO
N02
159. Champlain Valley Interstate
(Vermont portion)

221. Vermont
AR
AR
"X" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS, but no call for
a SIP revision.

"AR" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS and a call for
a SIP revision for attainment and maintenance.
"MR" indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS, however, a SIP
revision for maintenance is necessary.
A blank indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS and no calls for
SIP revisions.
57
-------
VERMONT

Table B. STATUS OF SELECTED PORTIONS OF THE

STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SIP Portion
Status
New Source Review
Approved
Transportation Measures
None required
Emission Limitations
Approved
aSection 51.18 only because PSD is disapproved nationwide. See
section on new source review in SIP Overview for more details.
Table C. COMPARISON OF FY 1977 PROJECTED NEEDS AND

ACTUAL FY 1976 RESOURCES
Resources
Resource needs projected for FY 1977
Actual resources available in FY 1976
Man-years
23
11
Dollars (xlO3)
$480
270
58
-------
VERMONT

Table D. SUMMARY OF STATE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY (June 30, 1976)a
MAJOR INSTALLATIONS
(Facilities capable -
of emitting over
100 tons of a pol-
lutant each year)
56
Status with respect to emission
limits and/or compliance schedules
In compliance
47
In violation
3
Unknown
6
INVESTIGATIONS OF COMPLIANCE STATUS 97/1/75 to 6/30/76)
T! Formal written inquiries 0
2. Field investigations. 87
TOTAL
CASE DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS (7/1/75 to 6/30/76)
T. Notices/citations of violation issued —
2. Administrative orders issued •
3. Civil/criminal proceedings initiated
TOTAL
87
9
8
2

79~
"Formal Reporting System - State Activity Report,"
EPA Office of Planning and Management,
Program Reporting Division, June 30, 1976.
Number represent state and local enforcement activity.
59
-------
EPA REGION II
NEW JERSEY
NEW YORK
PUERTO RICO
VIRGIN ISLANDS
61
-------
TABLE A

NEW JERSEY
Attainment Status of National Ambient Air Quality Standards

by Air Quality Control Region
"~~~'~~-— -^_ Pollutant
AQCR ~^ — -^^^
043. New Jersey -New York-Conn.
Interstate (N.J. portion)
045. Metropolitan Philadelphia
Interstate (N.J. portion)
150. New Jersey
151. Northeast Pennsylvania-
Upper Delaware Valley Inter-
state (N.J. portion)
TSP

AR
MR

MR
so2

AR
X

X
Ox

AR
AR

2
AR'
N02

"X" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS, but no call for
a SIP revision.

"AR" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS and a call for
a SIP revision for attainment and maintenance.

"MR" indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS, however, a SIP
revision for maintenance is necessary.

A blank indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS and no calls for
SIP revisions.
2
No or insufficient air monitoring data available. Attainment status
is based on one or more of the following considerations:
(a) diffusion model
(b) emission inventory
(c) historical or incomplete data base
(d) measured air quality in adjacent AQCRs.
62
-------
NEW JERSEY

Table B. STATUS OF SELECTED PORTIONS OF THE

STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SIP Portion
Status
New Source Review
Approved
Transportation Measures
Emission Limitations
State submittal approved on 7/7/76
for storage of volatile organic
liquids.

EPA promulgation (7/73) for HC,
approved for other pollutants.
Section 51.18 only because PSD is disapproved nationwide. See
section on new source review in SIP- Overview for more details.
Table C. COMPARISON OF FY 1977 PROJECTED NEEDS AND

ACTUAL FY 1976 RESOURCES
Resources
Resource needs projected for FY 1977
Actual resources available in FY 1976
Man-years .
246
190
Dollars (xlO3)
$4,915
4,346
63
-------
NEW JERSEY

Table D. SUMMARY OF STATE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY (June 30, 1976)'
MAJOR INSTALLATIONS
(Facilities capable
of emitting over
100 tons of a pol-
lutant each year)'
666
Status with respect to emission
limits and/or compliance schedules
In compliance
608
In violation
43
Unknown
15
INVESTIGATIONS OF COMPLIANCE STATUS 97/1/75 to 6/30/76)
T"!Formal written inquiries 1,957
2. Field investigations 21,212
TOTAL
CASE DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS (7/1/75 to 6/30/76)
T. Notices/citations of violation issued —
2. Administrative orders issued.,.. .,
3. Civil/criminal proceedings initiated
TOTAL
23,169
209
1,744
204

2,157
a"Formal Reporting System - State Activity Report,"
EPA Office of Planning and Management,
Program.Reporting Division, June 30, 1976.
Number represent state and local enforcement activity.
64
-------
TABLE A

NEW YORK
Attainment Status of National Ambient Air Quality Standards
by Air Quality Control Region
~"--~— ^^_ Pollutant
AQCR ^-^-^_
043. New Jersey -New York-Conn.
Interstate (N.Y. portion)
158. Central New York
159. Champlain Valley Interstate
(N.Y. portion)
160. Genesee-Fingerlakes
161. Hudson Valley
162. Niagara Frontier
163. Southern Tier East
164. Southern Tier West
TSP
AR
AR

MR
AR
AR
MR
AR
so2
AR2

4
X^

AR4
MR3
AR4
AR4
CO
MR3
X
2
t-

X
X

Ox
AR
AR

AR
AR
AR
AR
AR2
AR
N0£
X4

2
2
"X" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS, but no call for
a SIP revision.

"AR" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS and a call for
a SIP revision for attainment and maintenance.

"MR" indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS, however, a SIP
revision for maintenance is necessary.
A blank indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS and no calls for
SIP revisions.
2
No or insufficient air monitoring data available. Attainment status
is based on one or more of the following considerations:
(a) diffusion model
(b) emission inventory
(c) historical or incomplete data base
(d) measured air quality in adjacent AQCRs.

Non-attainment of the NAAQS and a call for a SIP revision for maintenance
only.
4
Point source or other localized problem.
65
-------
NEW YORK

Table B. STATUS OF SELECTED PORTIONS OF THE

STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SIP Portion
Status
New Source Review
Approved 9/15/75
Transportation Measures
Emission Limitations
Approval of HC measures involving sol-
vent reformulation, recalculation of auto
emissions and deletion of inspection/
maintenance of light duty vehicles for
Genesee-Finger Lakes AQCR on 10/31/75
Rulemaking for S02 (6/75), approved for
other pollutants.
aSection 51.18 only because PSD is disapproved nationwide. See
section on new source review in SIP Overview for more details.
Table C. COMPARISON OF FY 1977 PROJECTED NEEDS AND

ACTUAL FY 1976 RESOURCES
Resources
Resource needs projected for FY 1977
Actual resources available in F-Y 1976
Man-years
1,129
720
Dollars (xlO3)
$28,822
17,555
66
-------
NEW YORK

Table D. SUMMARY OF STATE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY (June 30, 1976)'
MAJOR INSTALLATIONS
(Facilities capable
of emitting over
100 tons of a pol-
lutant each year)
990
•Status with respect to emission
limits and/or compliance schedules
In compliance
852
In violation
99
Unknown
39
INVESTIGATIONS OF COMPLIANCE STATUS 97/1/75 to 6/30/76)
T. Formal written inquiries °
2. Field investigations 33,491
TOTAL
CASE DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS (7/1/75 to 6/30/76)
T. Notices/citations of violation issued
2. Administrative orders, issued ,
3. Civil/criminal proceedings initiated
TOTAL
33,491
1,617
55
0

1,672
Formal Reporting System - State Activity Report,"
EPA Office of Planning and Management,
Program Reporting Division, June 30, 1976.
Number represent state and local enforcement activity.
67
-------
TABLE A

PUERTO RICO
Attainment Status of National Ambient Air Quality Standards

by Air Quality Control Region
AQCR
Pollutant
TSP
SO,
CO
N02
244. Puerto Rico
AR
MR
"X" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS, but no call for
a SIP revision.

"AR" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS and a call for
a SIP revision for attainment and maintenance.

"MR" indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS, however, a SIP
revision for maintenance is necessary.

A blank indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS and no calls for
SIP revisions.
2
No or insufficient air monitoring data available. Attainment status
is based on one or more of the following considerations:
diffusion model
emission inventory
historical or incomplete data base
measured air quality in adjacent AQCRs.
68
-------
PUERTO RICO

Table B. STATUS OF SELECTED PORTIONS OF THE

STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SIP Portion
Status
New Source Review
Approved
Transportation Measures
None required
Emission Limitations
Deficient in part for S0£ (9/75),
approved for other pollutants.
Section 51.18 only because PSD is disapproved nationwide. See
section on new source review in SIP Overview for more details.
Table C. COMPARISON OF FY 1977 PROJECTED NEEDS AND

ACTUAL FY 1976 RESOURCES
Resources
Resource needs projected for FY 1977
Actual resources available in FY 1976
Man-years
77
45
Dollars (xlO3)
$800
721
69
-------
PUERTO RICO

Table D. SUMMARY OF STATE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY (June 30, 1976)'
MAJOR INSTALLATIONS.
(Facilities capable
of emitting over
TOO tons of a pol-
lutant each year)
137
Status with respect to emission
limits and/or compliance schedules
In compliance
89
In violation
42
Unknown
6
INVESTIGATIONS OF COMPLIANCE STATUS 97/1/75 to 6/30/76)
TT Formal written inquiries 219
2. Field investigations 1,626
TOTAL
CASE DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS (7/1/75 to 6/30/76)
Y.Notices/citations of violation issued...
2. Administrative orders issued.. —
3. Civil/criminal proceedings initiated
TOTAL
1,845
42
101
3

146
"Formal Reporting System - State Activity Report,"
EPA Office of Planning and Management,
Program Reporting Division, June 30, 1976.
Number represent state and local enforcement activity.
70
-------
TABLE A

U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
Attainment Status of National Ambient Air Quality Standards

by Air Quality Control Region
AQCR
Pollutant
TSP
SO,
CO
N02
247. U.S. Virgin Islands
"X" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS, but no call for
a SIP revision.

"AR" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS and a call for
a SIP revision for attainment and maintenance.

"MR" indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS, however, a SIP
revision for maintenance is necessary.

A blank indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS and no calls for
SIP revisions.
2
No or insufficient air monitoring data available. Attainment status
1s based on one or more of the following considerations:
(a) diffusion model
(b) emission inventory
(c) hi«
historical or incomplete data base
(d) measured air quality in adjacent AQCRs.
Point source or other localized problem.
71
-------
VIRGIN ISLANDS

Table.B. STATUS OF SELECTED PORTIONS OF THE

STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SIP Portion
Status
New Source Review
Approved for a]l except public
comment provisions (9/10/75)
Transportation Measures
None required
Emission Limitations
Approved
aSection 51.18 only because PSD is disapproved nationwide. See
section on new source review in SIP Overview for more details.
Table C. COMPARISON OF FY 1977 PROJECTED NEEDS AND

ACTUAL FY 1976 RESOURCES
Resources
Resource needs projected for FY 1977
Actual resources available in FY 1976
Man-years
10
7
Dollars (xlO3)
$165
138
72
-------
VIRGIN ISLANDS

Table D. SUMMARY OF STATE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY (June 30, 1976)a
MAJOR INSTALLATIONS
(Facilities capable
of emitting over
100 tons, of a pol-
lutant each year)
12
Status with respect to emission
limits and/or compliance schedules
In compliance
10
In violation
1
Unknown
1
INVESTIGATIONS OF COMPLIANCE STATUS 97/1/75 -to 6/30/76)
TFormal written inquiries 0
2. Field investigations .... 15
TOTAL
CASE DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS (7/1/75 to 6/30/76)
T. Notices/citations of violation issued —
2. Administrative orders issued
3. Civil/criminal proceedings initiated...;
TOTAL
15
17
1
0

18"
^"Formal Reporting System - State Activity Report,"
EPA Office of Planning and Management,
Program Reporting Division, June 30, 1976.
Number represent state and local enforcement activity.
73
-------
EPA REGION III
DELAWARE
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
MARYLAND
PENNSYLVANIA
VIRGINIA
WEST VIRGINIA
75
-------
TABLE A
DELAWARE
Attainment Status of National Ambient Air Quality Standards

by Air Quality Control Region
AQCR
Pollutant
TSP
SO,
CO
N02
045. Metropolitan Philadelphia
Interstate (Delaware portion)

046. Southern Delaware
AR

AR
"X" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS, but no call for
a SIP revision.

"AR" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS and a call for
a SIP revision for attainment and maintenance.

"MR" indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS, however, a SIP
revision for maintenance is necessary.

A blank indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS and no calls for
SIP revisions.
76
-------
DELAWARE

Table B. STATUS OF SELECTED PORTIONS'OF Tl.c

STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SIP Portion
Status
New Source Review
Transportation Measures
Approved

ACTUAL FY 1976.RESOURCES
Resources
Resource needs projected for FY 1977
Actual resources available in FY 1976
Man -years
48
24
Dollars (xlO3)
$670
525
77
-------
DELAWARE

Table D. SUMMARY OF STAft ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY (June 30, 1976)*
MAJOR INSTALLATIONS
(Facilities capable
of emitting over
100 tons of a pol-
lutant each year)
53
Status with respect to emission
limits and/or compliance schedules
In compliance
52
In violation
1
Unknown
0
INVESTIGATIONS OF COMPLIANCE STATUS 97/1/75 to 6/30/76)
T. Formal written inquiries
2. Field investigations..
No data
TOTAL
CASE DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS (7/1/75 to 6/30/76)
Ti Notices/citations of violation issued —
2. Administrative orders issued
3. Civil./criminal proceedings initiated
No data
TOTAL
a"Formal Reporting System - State Activity Report,"
EPA Office of Planning and Management,
Program Reporting Division, June 30, 1976.
Number represent state and local enforcement activity.
78
-------
TABLE A
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Attainment Status of National Ambient Air Quality Standards

by Air Quality Control Region
AQCR
Pollutant
TSP
SO,
CO
N02
047. National Capital Interstate
(D.C, portion)
AR
AR
AR
"X" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS, but no call for
a SIP revision.

"AR" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS and a call for
a SIP revision for attainment and maintenance.

"MR" indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS, however, a SIP
revision for maintenance is necessary.

A blank indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS and no calls for
SIP revisions.
79
-------
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Table B. STATUS OF SELECTED PORTIONS OF THE
STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SIP Portion
Status
New Source Review'
Approved
Transportation Measures
Emission Limitations
Measures promulgated for .National
Capital AQCR

Approved
aSection 51.18 only because PSD is disapproved nationwide. See
section on new source review in SIP Overview for more details.
Table C. COMPARISON OF FY 1977 PROJECTED NEEDS AND
ACTUAL FY 1976 RESOURCES
Resources
Resource needs projected for FY 1977
Actual resources available in FY 1976
Man-years
54
22
Dollars (xlO3)
$980
487
80
-------
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Table D. SUMMARY OF STATE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY (June 30, 1976)'
MAJOR INSTALLATIONS
(Facilities capable
of emitting over
100 tons of a pol-
lutant each year)
35
Status with respect to emission
limits and/or compliance schedules
In compliance:
26
In violation
9
Unknown
0
INVESTIGATIONS OF COMPLIANCE STATUS 97/1/75 to 6/30/76)
T. Formal written inquiries —.. — .
2. Field investigations .....
TOTAL
CASE DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS (7/1/75 to 6/30/76)
Ti Notices/citations of violation issued —
2. Administrative orders issued ,
3. Civil/criminal proceedings initiated
TOTAL
No data
No data
"Formal Reporting System - State Activity .Report,"
EPA Office of Planning,and Management,
Program Reporting Division, June 30, 1976".
Number represent state and local enforcement activity.
-------
TABLE A
MARYLAND
Attainment Status of National Ambient Air Quality Standards

by Air Quality Control Region
~~~" • — -^_ Pollutant
AQCR ^^~^^-^^
047. National Capital Interstate
(Md. portion)
112. Central Maryland
113. Cumberland-Keyser Interstate
(Md. portion)
114. Eastern Shore
115. Metropolitan Baltimore
116. Southern Maryland
TSP

so2

AR
AR

AR
AR
AR
AR
N02

"X" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS, but no call for
a SIP revision.

"AR" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS and a call for
a SIP revision for attainment and maintenance.

"MR" indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS, however, a SIP
revision for maintenance is necessary.

A blank indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS and no calls for
SIP revisions.
82
-------
MARYLAND

Table B. STATUS OF SELECTED PORTIONS OF THE

STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SIP Portion
Status
New Source Review
Transportation,Measures
Emission Limitations
Approved

» ;
Approval of Stage I HC regs. for sources
having > 20,000 gal/month throughput.
Fed. regs. remain 'in effect for sources
< 20,000 gal/month.
Approval of S02 limitations for point
sources over 100 million BTUs/hr. to
3.5 lb/]06 for solid fuel and 2.0% of
residual fuel oil.
Deletion of 0.5% sulfur-in-fuel limit
for Metro. Baltimore AQGR.
aSection 51.18 only because PSD is disapproved nationwide. See
section on new source review in SIP Overview for more details.
Table C. COMPARISON OF FY 1977 PROJECTED NEEDS AND

ACTUAL FY 1976 RESOURCES
Resources
Resource needs projected for FY 1977
Actual resources available in FY 1976
Man-years
212
169
Dollars (xlO3)
$3,975
3,609
83
-------
MARYLAND
Table D. SUMMARY OF STATE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY (June 30, 1976)'
MAJOR INSTALLATIONS
(Facilities capable
of emitting over
100 tons of a pol-
lutant each year)
224
Status with respect to emission
limits and/or compliance schedules
In compliance
212
In violation
12
Unknown
0
INVESTIGATIONS OF COMPLIANCE STATUS 97/1/75 to 6/30/76)
T!Formal written inquiries
2. Field investigations ...........
No data
TOTAL
CASE DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS (7/1/75 to 6/30/76)
T. Notices/citations of violation issued —
2. Administrative orders issued
3. Civil/criminal proceedings initiated
No data
TOTAL
a"Formal Reporting System - State Activity Report,"
EPA Office of Planning and Management,
'Program Reporting Division, June 30, 1976.
Number represent state and local enforcement activity.
84
-------
TABLE A

PENNSYLVANIA
Attainment Status of National Ambient Air Quality Standards

by Air Quality Control Region
" — *--'-^_ Pollutant
AQCR ^^—^_
045. Metropolitan Philadelphia
Interstate (Pa. portion)
151. Northeast Pennsylvania-
Upper Delaware Valley Inter-
state (Pa. portion)
178. Northwest Pennsylvania-
Youngstown Ihterstate
(Pennsylvania portion)
195. Central Pennsylvania
196. South Central Pennsylvania
197. Southwest Pennsylvania
TSP

AR
AR
AR
AR
so2

AR
CO

AR
Ox

AR
AR
AR
AR
N02

"X" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS, but no call for
a SIP revision.

"AR" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS and a call for
a SIP revision for attainment and maintenance.

"MR" indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS, however, a SIP
revision for maintenance is necessary.

A blank indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS and no calls for
SIP revisions.
85
-------
PENNSYLVANIA

Table B. STATUS OF SELECTED PORTIONS OF THE

STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SIP Portion
Status
New Source.Review
Transportation Measures
Emission Limitations
Approved

Approval of Stage I HC regs. for sources
having > 20,000 gal/month throughput.
Federal regs. remain in effect for
.sources < 20,000 gal/month.

Regulations for zinc smelters approved.

Delay in effective date of 0.3% sulfur-
in-fuel limit for state until 10/1/76
approved on 5/10/76.
Section 51.18 only because PSD is disapproved nationwide. See
section on new source review in SIP Overview for more details.
Table C.. COMPARISON OF FY 1977 PROJECTED NEEDS AND

ACTUAL FY 1976 RESOURCES
Resources
Resource needs projected for FY 1977
Actual resources available in FY 1976
Man-years
523
379
. Dollars (xlO3)
$11,758
8,289
86
-------
PENNSYLVANIA

Table D. SUMMARY OF STATE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY (June 30, 1976)a
MAJOR INSTALLATIONS
(Facilities capable
of emitting over
100 tons of a pol-
lutant each year)
1,852
Status with respect to emission
limits and/or compliance schedules
In compliance
1 ,684
In violation
165
Unknown
3
INVESTIGATIONS OF COMPLIANCE STATUS 97/1/75 to 6/30/76)
Y. Formal written inquiries. .. .
2. Field investigations No data
TOTAL
CASE DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS (7/1/75 to.6/30/76)
Y.Notices/citations of violation issued...
2. Administrative orders issued
3. .Civil/criminal proceedings initiated
No data
TOTAL
"Formal Reporting System - State Activity Report,"
EPA Office of Planning and Management,
Program Reporting Division, June 30, 1976.
Number represent state and local enforcement activity.
87
-------
TABLE A
VIRGINIA
Attainment Status of National Ambient Air Quality Standards
by Air Quality Control Region
~~~~~""-~— -^_ Pollutant
AQCR - — --^^^
047. National Capital Interstate
(Virginia portion)
207. Eastern Tennessee-Southwester
Virginia Interstate
(Virginia portion)
222. Central Virginia
223. Hampton Roads
224. Northeastern Virginia
225. State Capital
226. Valley of Virginia
TSP

X
X
X

X
X
so2

AR
AR
AR
AR
AR
AR
N0£

"X" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS, but no call for
a SIP revision.
"AR" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS and a call for
a SIP revision for attainment and maintenance.
"MR" indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS, however, a SIP
revision for maintenance is necessary.
A blank indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS and no calls for
SIP revisions.
88
-------
VIRGINIA
Table B, STATUS OF SELECTED PORTIONS OF THE
STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SIP Portion
Status
New Source Review
Approved
Transportation Measures
EPA promulgation for National Capital
AQCR.
Emission Limitations
Approved
aSection 51.18 only because PSD is disapproved nationwide. See
section on new source review in SIP Overview for more details.
Table C. COMPARISON OF FY 1977 PROJECTED NEEDS AND
ACTUAL FY 1976 RESOURCES
Resources
Resource needs projected for FY 1977
Actual resources available in FY 1976
Man-years
325
145
Dollars (xlO3)
$4,557
2,667
89
-------
VIRGINIA
Table D. SUMMARY OF STATE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY (June 30, 1976)'
MAJOR INSTALLATIONS
(Facilities capable
of emitting over
100 tons of a pol-
lutant each year)
572
Status with respect to emission
limits and/or compliance schedules
In compliance
554
In violation
18
Unknown
0
INVESTIGATIONS OF COMPLIANCE STATUS 97/1/75 to 6/30/76)
T. Formal written inquiries.
2. Field investigations
TOTAL
CASE DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS (7/1/75 to 6/30/76)
T.Notices/citations of violation issued...
2. Administrative orders issued
3. Civil/criminal proceedings initiated
TOTAL
"Formal Reporting System - State: Activity Report,"
EPA Office of Planning and Management,
Program Reporting Division, June 30, 1976.
Number represent state and local enforcement activity.
No data
No data
90
-------
TABLE A
WEST VIRGINIA
Attainment Status of National Ambient Air Quality Standards

by Air Quality Control Region
~~~"~"~--— ->^_ Pollutant
AQCR ' — -— ^^^^
103. Huntington-Ashland-Portsmoutl
Ironton Interstate (W.Va.
portion)
113. Cumberland-Keyser Interstate
(W. Virginia portion)
179. Parkersburg-Marietta Inter-
state (W. Va. portion)
181. S teubenvi lie-Wei rton-
Wheelinq Interstate (W. Va.
portion)
231. Allegheny
232. Central West Virginia
233. Eastern Panhandle
234. Kanawha Valley
235. North Central West Virginia
236. Southern West Virginia
TSP
X

so2

X
CO

Ox
AR
AR
AR
AR
AR
AR
AR
AR
AR
AR
NOz

"X" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS, but no call for
a SIP revision.

"AR" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS and a call for
a SIP revision for attainment and maintenance.

"MR" indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS, however, a SIP
revision for maintenance is necessary.

A blank indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS and no calls for
SIP revisions.
91
-------
WEST VIRGINIA

Table B STATUS.OF SELECTED PORTIONS OF THE

STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SIP Portion
Status
New Source Review
Approved (11/10/75)
Transportation Measures
None required
Emission Limitations
Approved
aSection 51.18 only because PSD i.s disapproved nationwide. See
section on new source review in SIP Overview for more, details.
Table C. COMPARISON OF FY 1977 PROJECTED NEEDS AND

ACTUAL FY 1976 RESOURCES
Resources
Resource needs projected for FY 1977
Actual resources available in FY 1976
Man-years
138
65
Dollars (xlO3)
$2,108
1,109
92
-------
WEST VIRGINIA

Table D. SUMMARY OF STATE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY (Ju'ne 30, 1976)a
MAJOR INSTALLATIONS
(Facilities capable
of emitting over -
100 tons of a pol-
lutant each year)
262
Status with respect to emission
limits and/or compliance schedules
In compliance
218
In violation
43
Unknown
1
INVESTIGATIONS .OF COMPLIANCE STATUS 97/1/75 to 6/30/76)
T;Formal written inquiries..
2. Field investigations.... '......• No data
TOTAL
CASE DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS (7/1/75 to 6/30/76)
T. Notices/citations of violation issued —
2. Administrative orders issued..
3. Civil/criminal proceedings initiated
No data
TOTAL
"Formal Reporting System.- State Activity Report,"
EPA Office of Planning and Management,
Program Reporting Division, June 30, 1976.
Number represent state and local enforcement activity.
93
-------
EPA REGION IV
ALABAMA

FLORIDA

GEORGIA

KENTUCKY

MISSISSIPPI

NORTH CAROLINA

SOUTH CAROLINA

TENNESSEE
95
-------
TABLE A

ALABAMA
Attainment Status of National Ambient Air Quality Standards

by Air Quality Control Region
" — -— ~^_ Pollutant
AQCR ' ^^^^
001. Alabama and Tombigbee Rivers
002. Columbus-Phenix City Inter-
state (Alabama portion)
003. East Alabama
004. Metropolitan Birmingham
005. Mobil e-Pensacola-Panama City
Southern Mississippi Inter-
state (Alabama portion)
006. Southeast Alabama
007. Tennessee River Valley-Cumber
land Mountains Interstate
(Alabama portion)
TSP

X
AR

X
so2

X
CO

N02

"X" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS, but no call for
a SIP revision.

"AR" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS and a call for
a SIP revision for attainment and maintenance.

"MR" indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS, however, a SIP
revision for maintenance is necessary.

A blank indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS and no calls for
SIP revisions.
96
-------
ALABAMA

Table B. STATUS OF SELECTED PORTIONS OF THE

STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SIP Portion
Status
New Source Review
Approved
Transportation Measures
None required
Emission Limitations
Revised p.m. limit for Portland Cement
plants approved 5/11/76.

Revised limitations for SO, for sulfuric
acid plants approved 5/27/76.
aSection 51.18 only because PSD is disapproved nationwide. See
section on new source review in SIP Overview for more details.
Table C. COMPARISON-OF-FY 1977 PROJECTED NEEDS AND

ACTUAL FY 1976 RESOURCES
Resources
Resource needs projected for FY 1977
Actual resources available in FY 1976
Man-years
168
99
Dollars (xlO3)
$2,655
1,819
-------
ALABAMA
Table D. SUMMARY OF STATE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY (June 30, 1976)(
MAJOR INSTALLATIONS
(Facilities capable
of emitting over
100 tons of a pol- .
lutant each year)
816
Status with respect to emission
limits and/or compliance schedules
In compliance
799
In violation
17
Unknown
0
INVESTIGATIONS OF COMPLIANCE STATUS 97/1/75 to 6/30/76)
Y. Formal written inquiries .. 140
2. Field investigations 5,967
TOTAL
CASE DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS (7/1/75 to 6/30/76)
T Notices/citations of violation issued —
2. Administrative orders issued
3. Civil/criminal proceedings initiated
TOTAL
6,107
53
4
3

60
"Formal Reporting System - State Activity Report,"
EPA Office of Planning and Management,
Program Reporting Division, June 30, 1976.
Number represent state and local enforcement activity.
98
-------
TABLE A

FLORIDA
Attainment Status of National Ambient Air Quality Standards

by Air Quality Control Region
~^~~^-*^__ Pollutant
AQCR ~~- — -^_^^
005. Mobil e-Pensacola-Panama City
Southern Mississippi Inter-
state (Florida portion)
048. Central Florida
049. Jacksonville-Brunswick Inter-
state (Florida portion)
050. Southeast Florida
051. Southwest Florida
052. West Central Florida
TSP

X
so2

X
CO

X
X

X
N02

"X" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS, but no call for
a SIP revision.

"AR" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS and a call for
a SIP revision for attainment and maintenance.

"MR" indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS, however, a SIP
revision for maintenance is necessary.

A blank indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS and no calls for
SIP revisions.
99
-------
FLORIDA

Table B. STATUS OF SELECTED PORTIONS OF THE

STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SIP Portion
Status
New Source Review
Approved
Transportation Measures
None required
Emission Limitations
Approval of change in SOJimitations
(relaxation) for power pfants in all
counties except Duval, Escambia and
Hillsborough on 4/19/76. (307 challenge)
Section 51.18 only because PSD is disapproved nationwide. See
section on new source review in SIP Overview for more details.
Table C. COMPARISON OF FY 1977 PROJECTED NEEDS AND

ACTUAL FY 1976 RESOURCES
Resources
Resource needs projected for FY 1977
Actual resources available in FY 1976
Man-years
235
115
Dollars (xlO3)
$4,097
2,562
100
-------
FLORIDA
Table• D. SUMMARY OF STATE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY (June 30, 1976)'
MAJOR INSTALLATIONS
(Facilities capable
of emitting over
100 tons of a pol-
lutant each year)
435
Status, with respect to emission
limits and/or compliance, schedules
In compliance
407
In violation
26
Unknown
2
INVESTIGATIONS OF COMPLIANCE STATUS- 97/1/75 to 6/30/76)
1.. Formal written inquiries... , 201
2.' Field investigations 3,126
TOTAL
CASE DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS (7/1/75 to 6/30/76)
1. Notices/citations of violation issued —
2. Administrative orders issued.. ,
3. Civil/criminal proceedings initiated....
TOTAL
3,327
180
29
42

251
"Formal Reporting System - State Activity Report,"
EPA Office of Planning and Management,
Program Reporting Division, June 30, 1976.
Number represent state and local enforcement activity.
101
-------
TABLE A
GEORGIA
Attainment Status of National Ambient Air Quality Standards

by Air Quality Control Region
~""~" — u>_ Pollutant
AQCR ^ ^•^-_
002. Columbus-Phenix City Inter-
state (Georgia portion)
049. Jacksonville-Brunswick
Interstate (Georgia portion)
053. Augusta -Ai ken Interstate
(Georgia portion)
054. Central Georgia
055. Chattanooga Interstate
(Georgia portion)
056. Metropolitan Atlanta
057. Northeast Georgia
058. Savannah-Beaufort Interstate
(Georgia portion)
059. Southwest Georgia
TSP

so2

N02

"X" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS, but no call for
a SIP revision.

"AR" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS and a call for
a SIP revision for attainment and maintenance.

"MR" indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS, however, a SIP .
revision for maintenance is necessary.

A blank indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS and no calls for
SIP revisions.
102
-------
GEORGIA

Table B. STATUS OF SELECTED PORTIONS-OF THE

STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
•SIP Portion
Status
New Source Review3
Approved
Transportation Measures
None required
Emission Limitations
Section 51.18 only because PSD is disapproved nationwide. See
sect'ion on new .source review in SIP Overview for more details.
Table C. COMPARISON OF FY 1977 PROJECTED NEEDS AMD

ACTUAL FY 1976 RESOURCES
Resources
Resource needs projected for FY 1977
Actual resources available in FY 1976
Man-years
131
86
Dollars (xlO3)
$2,602
1,738
103
-------
GEORGIA
Table D. SUMMARY OF STATE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY (June 30, 1976)'
MAJOR INSTALLATIONS
(Facilities capable
of emitting over
100 tons of a pol-
lutant each year)
303
Status with respect to emission
limits and/or compliance schedules
In compliance
281
In violation
22
Unknown
0
INVESTIGATIONS OF COMPLIANCE STATUS.97/1/75 to 6/30/76)
T!Formal written inquiries ™
2. Field investigations... 1,702
TOTAL
CASE DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS (7/1/75 to 6/30/76)
1.. Notices/citations of violation issued...
2. Administrative orders issued.
3. Civil/criminal proceedings initiated
TOTAL
1,780
31
12
3

46
a"Formal Reporting System - State Activity Report,"
EPA Office of Planning and Management,
Program Reporting Division, June 30, 1976.
Number represent state and local enforcement activity.
104
-------
TABLE A

KENTUCKY
Attainment Status of National Ambient Air Quality Standards

by Air Quality Control Region
~~"~~" — - _^_ Pollutant
AQCR ^.^^^
072. Paducah-Cairo Interstate
(Kentucky portion)
077. Evansville-Owensboro-Hender-
son Interstate (Kentucky
portion)
078. Louisville Interstate
(Kentucky portion)
079. Metropolitan Cincinnati Inter
state (Kentucky portion)
101. Appalachian
102. Bluegrass
1 03 . Hunti ngton-Ashl and-Portsmouth
Ironton Interstate (Kentucky
portion)
104. North Central Kentucky
105. South Central Kentucky
TSP

X
_
X
X
X

so2

N02

"X" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS, but no call for
a SIP revision.

"AR" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS and a call for
a SIP revision for attainment and maintenance.

"MR" indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS, however, a SIP
revision for maintenance is necessary.

A blank indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS and no calls for
SIP revisions.
105
-------
KENTUCKY

Table B. STATUS OF SELECTED PORTIONS OF THE

STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SIP Portion
Status
New Source Review
Approved
Transportation Measures
None required
Emission Limitations
Entire set of regulations approved
on 5/10/76. (307.challenge)
Section 51.18 only because PSD is disapproved nationwide. See
section on new source review in SIP Overview for more details.
Table C. COMPARISON OF FY 1.977 PROJECTED NEEDS AMD

ACTUAL FY 1976 RESOURCES .
Resources
Resource needs projected for FY 1977
Actual resources available in FY 1976.
Man-years
201
141
Dollars (xlO3)
$3,592
2,641
106
-------
KENTUCKY
Table D. SUMMARY OF STATE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY (June 30, 1976)(
MAJOR INSTALLATIONS
(Facilities capable
" of emitting over
100 tons of a pol-
lutant each year)
774
Status with respect to emission
limits and/or compliance schedules
In compliance
516
In violation
258
Unknown
0
INVESTIGATIONS OF COMPLIANCE STATUS 97/1/75 to 6/30/76)
T Formal written inquiries.. 199
2. Field investigations 3,749
TOTAL
CASE-DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS (7/1/75 to 6/30/76)
TiNotices/citations of violation issued...,
2. Administrative orders issued ,
3. Civil/criminal proceedings initiated
TOTAL
3,948
224
39
79

342
"Formal Reporting System - State Activity Report,"
EPA Office of Planning and Management,
Program Reporting Division, June 30, 1976.
Number represent state and local enforcement activity.
107
-------
TABLE A

MISSISSIPPI
Attainment Status of National Ambient Air Quali.ty Standards

by Air Quality Control Region
"~~ — •— ^_ Pollutant
AQCR "^^-^_
005. Mobil e-Pensacola-Panama City
Southern Mississippi Inter-
state (Mississippi portion)
018. Metropolitan Memphis Inter-
state (Mississippi portion)
134. Mississippi Delta
135. Northeast Mississippi
TSP
X

so2

Ox
X

N02

"X" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS, but no call for
a SIP revision. '

"AR" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS and a call for
a SIP revision for attainment and maintenance.

"MR" indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS, however, a SIP
revision for maintenance is necessary.

A blank indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS and no calls for
SIP revisions.
108
-------
MISSISSIPPI
Table B. STATUS OF SELECTED PORTIONS OF THE
STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SIP Portion
Status
New Source Review
Approved
Transportation Measures
None required
-Emission Limitations.
Approved
Section 51.18 only because PSD is disapproved nationwide. See
se.ction on new source review in SIP Overview for more details.
Table C. COMPARISON OF FY 1977 PROJECTED NEEDS AND.
ACTUAL FY 1976 RESOURCES
Resources
Resource needs projected for FY 1977
Actual resources available in FY 1976
Man-years
79
48
Dollars (xlO3)
$1,240
656
109
-------
MISSISSIPPI
Table D. .SUMMARY OF STATE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY (June 30, 1976)'
MAJOR INSTALLATIONS
(Facilities capable
of emitting over
100 tons of a pol-
lutant each year)
333
Status with respect to emission
limits and/or compliance schedules
In compliance
237
In violation
78
Unknown
18
INVESTIGATIONS OF COMPLIANCE STATUS 97/1/75 to 6/30/76)
TFormal written inquiries. 58
2. Field investigations 132
TOTAL
CASE DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS (7/1/75 to 6/30/76)
T. Notices/citations of violation issued —
2> Administrative orders issued
3... Civil/criminal proceedings initiated
190
0
11
0
TOTAL
11
a"Formal Reporting System - State Activity Report,"
EPA Office of Planning and Management,
Program Reporting Division, June 30, 1976.
Number represent state and local enforcement activity.
n a
-------
TABLE A
NORTH CAROLINA
Attainment Status of National Ambient Air Quality Standards
by Air Quality Control Region
""~'~~^-— -^^_ Pollutant
AQCR ^~— ^^^^
136. Northern Piedmont
165. Eastern Mountain
166. Eastern Piedmont
167. Metropolitan Charlotte In-
terstate (North Carolina
portion)
168. Northern Coastal Plain
169. Sandhills
170. Southern Coastal Plain
171. Western Mountain
TSP

so2

N02

"X" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS, but no call for
a SIP revision.
"AR" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS and a call for
a SIP revision for attainment and maintenance.
"MR" indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS, however, a SIP
revision for maintenance is necessary.
A blank indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS and no calls for
SIP revisions.
Ill
-------
NORTH CAROLINA
Table B. STATUS OF SELECTED PORTIONS OF THE
STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SIP Portion
Status
New Source Review
Approved
Transportation Measures
None required
Emission Limitations
Approved
Section 51.18 only because PSD is disapproved nationwide. See
section on new source review in SIP Overview for more details.
Table C. COMPARISON OF FY 1977 PROJECTED NEEDS AMD
ACTUAL FY 1976 RESOURCES
Resources
Resource needs projected .for FY 1977
Actual resources available in FY 1976
Man -years
225
123
Dollars (xlO3)
$3,845
2,769
112
-------
NORTH CAROLINA
Table D. SUMMARY OF STATE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY (June 30, 1976)'
MAJOR INSTALLATIONS
'Facilities capable
of emitting over
100 tons of a pol-
lutant each year)
865
Status with respect to emission
limits and/or compliance schedules
In compliance
826
In violation
39
Unknown
0
INVESTIGATIONS OF COMPLIANCE STATUS 97/1/75 to 6/30/76)
T! Formal written inquiries 81
2. Field investigations 4,015
TOTAL
CASE DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS (7/1/75 to 6/30/76)
\. Notices/citations of violation issued —
2. Administrative orders issued
3. Civil/criminal proceedings initiated
4,096
54
82
1
TOTAL
137
a"Formal Reporting System - State Activity Report,"
• EPA Office of Planning and Management,
Program Reporting Division, June 30, 1976.
Number represent state and local enforcement activity.
113
-------
TABLE A
SOUTH CAROLINA
Attainment Status of National Ambient Air Quality Standards

by Air Quality Control Region
~ -— -^_ Pollutant
AQCR "^-^^
053. Augusta -Ai ken Interstate
(South Carolina portion)
058. Savannah-Beaufort Interstate
(South Carolina portion)
167. Metropolitan Charlotte In-
terstate (South Carolina
portion)
198. Camden-Sumter
199. Charleston
200. Columbia
201. Florence
202. Greenville-Spartanburg
203 . Greenwood
204 . Georgetown
TSP

MR
so2

N02

"X" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS, but no call for
a SIP revision.

"AR" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS and a call for
a SIP revision for attainment and maintenance.

"MR" indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS, however, a SIP
revision for maintenance is necessary.

A blank indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS and no calls for
SIP revisions.
114
-------
SOUTH CAROLINA
Table B. STATUS OF SELECTED PORTIONS OF THE
STATE:IMPLEMENTATION .PLAN
SIP Portion
Status
New Source Review
Approved
Transportation Measures
None required
Emission Limitations
Approved
aSection 51.18 only because PSD is disapproved nationwide. See
section on new source review in SIP Overview for more details.
Table C. COMPARISON OF. FY 1977 PROJECTED NEEDS AND
ACTUAL FY 1976 RESOURCES
Resources
Resource needs projected for FY 1977
Actual resources available in FY 1976
Man-years
130
71
Dollars (xlO3)
$2,237
1,206
115
-------
SOUTH CAROLINA
Table D. SUMMARY OF STATE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY (June 30, 1976)'
MAJOR INSTALLATIONS
(Facilities capable
of emitting over
100 tons of a pol-
lutant each year)
239
Status with respect to emission
limits and/or compliance schedules
In compliance
236
In violation
3
Unknown
0
INVESTIGATIONS OF COMPLIANCE STATUS 97/1/75 to 6/30/76)
Y. Formal written inquiries 0
2. Field investigations.... 1,076
TOTAL
CASE DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS (7/1/75 to 6/30/76)
1. Notices/citations of violation issued
2. Administrative orders issued ,
3. Civil/criminal proceedings initiated
1,076
123
0
0
TOTAL
123
"Formal Reporting System - State Activity Report,"
EPA Office of Planning and Management,
Program Reporting Division, June 30* 1976.
Number represent state and local enforcement activity.
116
-------
TABLE A

TENNESSEE
Attainment Status of National Ambient Air Quality Standards

by Air Quality Control Region
""" — - w^_ Pollutant
AQCR ^--^
007. Tennessee River Valley-
Cumberland Mountains Inter-
state (Tennessee portion)
018. Metropolitan Memphis Inter-
state (Tennessee portion)
055. Chattanooga Interstate
(Tennessee portion)
207. Eastern Tennessee-Southwester
Virginia Interstate
(Tennessee portion)
208. Middle Tennessee
209. Western Tennessee
TSP

X
X
X
so2

X
X

X
AR

N02

"X" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS, but no call for
a SIP revision.

"AR" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS and a call for
a SIP revision for attainment and maintenance.

"MR" indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS, however, a SIP
revision for maintenance is necessary.

A blank indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS and no calls for
SIP revisions.
117
-------
TENNESSEE
Table b. STATUS OF SELECTED PORTIONS OF THE
STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SIP Portion
Status
New Source Review
Approved
Transportation Measures
None required
Emission Limitations
Approved
aSection 51.13 only because PSD is disapproved nationwide. See
section on new source review in SIP Overview for more details.
Table C. COMPARISON OF FY 1977 PROJECTED NEEDS AND
ACTUAL FY 1976 RESOURCES
Resources
Resource needs projected for FY 1977
Actual resources available in FY 1976
Man-years
203
142
Dollars (xlO3)
$3,380
2,453
118
-------
TENNESSEE
Table D. SUMMARY OF STATE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY (June 30, 1976)'
MAJOR INSTALLATIONS
(Facilities capable
of emitting over
100 tons of a pol-
lutant each year)
705
Status with respect to emission
limits and/or compliance schedules
In compliance
579
In violation
126
Unknown
0
INVESTIGATIONS OF COMPLIANCE STATUS 97/1/75 to 6/30/76)
V. Formal written inquiries. 286
2. Field investigations 5,131
TOTAL
CASE DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS (7/1/75 to 6/30/76)
T^ Notices/citations of violation issued
2. Administrative orders issued ,
3. Civil/criminal proceedings initiated....
TOTAL
5,417
251
62
4_

317
a"Formal Reporting System - State Activity Report,"
EPA Office of Planning and Management,
Program Reporting Division, June 30, 1976.
Number represent state and local enforcement activity.
119
-------
EPA REGION V
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
OHIO
WISCONSIN
121
-------
TABLE A
ILLINOIS
Attainment Status of National Ambient Air Quality Standards
by Air Quality Control Region
~""---w^_ Pollutant
AQCR -^-^
065. Burlington-Keokuk Interstate
(Illinois portion)
066. East Central Illinois
067. Metropolitan Chicago Inter-
state (Illinois portion)
068. Metropolitan Dubuque Inter-
state (Illinois portion)
069. Metropolitan Quad Cities In-
terstate (Illinois portion)
070. Metropolitan St. Louis Inter-
state (Illinois portion)
071. North Central Illinois
072. Paducah-Cairo Interstate
(Illinois portion)
073. Rockford-Janesville-Beloit
Interstate (Illinois portion)
074. Southeast Illinois
075. West Central Illinois
TSP

X
so2

AR
AR

AR
AR
AR
N02

Table.B. STATUS OF SELECTED PORTIONS OF THE

STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SIP Portion
Status
New Source Review
Approved
Transportation Measures Measures promulgated for Chicago AQCR.
Emission Limitations
CO strategy disapproved 6/73; approved
for other pollutants.
Section 51.18 only because PSD is disapproved nationwide. See
section on new source review in SIP Overview for more details.
Table C. COMPARISON OF FY 1977 PROJECTED NEEDS AND

ACTUAL FY 1976 RESOURCES
Resources
Resource needs projected for FY 1977
Actual resources available in FY 1976
Man-years
637
352
Dollars (xlO3)
$14,800
7,738
123
-------
ILLINOIS
Table D. SUMMARY OF .STATE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY (June 30, 1976)'
MAJOR INSTALLATIONS
(Facilities capable
of emitting over
100 tons of a pol-
lutant each year)
1,518
Status with respect to emission
limits and/or compliance schedules
In compliance
1 ,464
In violation
44
Unknown
10
INVESTIGATIONS OF COMPLIANCE STATUS 97/1/75 to 6/30/76)
T Formal written inquiries • 506
2. Field investigations... 2,099
TOTAL
CASE DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS (7/1/75 to 6/30/76)
T. .Notices/citations of violation issued —
2. Administrative orders issued.. ,
3. Civil/criminal proceedings initiated—,
TOTAL
2,605
69
0
30

99
"Formal Reporting System - State Activity Report,"
EPA Office of Planning and Management,
Program Reporting Division, June 30, 1976.
Number .represent state and local enforcement activity.
124
-------
TABLE A
INDIANA
Attainment Status of National Ambient Air Quali.ty Standards
by Air Quality Control Region
— — ~*^^ Pollutant
AQCR ~-l_^^^
067. Metropolitan Chicago Inter-
state (Indiana portion)
076. East Central Indiana
077 . Evansvi 1 1 e-Owensboro-Hender-
son Interstate (Indiana
portion)
078. Louisville Interstate
(Indiana portion)
079. Metropolitan Cincinnati
Interstate (Indiana portion)
080. Metropolitan Indianapolis
081. Northeast Indiana
082. South Bend-El khart-Benton
Harbor Interstate (Indiana
portion)
083. Southern Indiana
084. Wabash Valley
TSP

X
X

X
so2

X
X
X
CO

AR
AR

AR
AR
AR

AR
AR
AR
NOe

Table B. STATUS OF SELECTED PORTIONS OF THE

STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SIP Portion
Status
New Source Rev.iew
EPA promulgations (5/73 and 2/74)
Transportation Measures
EPA promulgation (4/74) for
Indianapolis AQCR.
Emission Limitations
Disapproval of regs. for. control of
HC from stationary sources on 5/6/76.
aSection 51.18 only because PSD is disapproved nationwide. See
section on new source review in SIP Overview for more details.
Table C. COMPARISON OF FY 1977 PROJECTED NEEDS AND

ACTUAL FY 1976 RESOURCES
Resources
Resource needs projected for FY 1977
Actual resources available in FY 1976
Man-years
180
160
Dollars (xlO3)
$2,338
2,866
126
-------
INDIANA
Table D. SUMMARY OF STATE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY (June 30, 1976)'
MAJOR INSTALLATIONS
(Facilities capable
of emitting over
100 tons of a pol-
lutant each year)
762
Status with respect to emission
limits and/or compliance schedules
In compliance
593
In violation
78
Unknown
91
INVESTIGATIONS OF COMPLIANCE STATUS 97/1/75 to 6/30/76)
1. Forma-1 written inquiries , 618
2. Field investigations 4,220
TOTAL
CASE DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS (7/1/75 to 6/30/76)
T.Notices/citations of violation issued...,
2. Administrative orders issued..
3. Civil/criminal proceedings initiated.—
TOTAL
4,838
436
82
18

536
"Formal Reporting System - State Activity Report,"
EPA Office of Planning and Management,
Progranf Reporting Division, June 30, 1976.
Number represent state and -local enforcement activity.
127
-------
TABLE A
MICHIGAN
Attainment Status of National Ambient Air Quality Standards

by Air Quality Control Region
"--— -^_ Pollutant
AQCR -^-L^ ^^
082. South Bend-El khart-Benton
Harbor Interstate (Michigan
portion)
122. Central Michigan
123. Metropolitan Detroit-Port
Huron
124. Metropolitan Toledo Inter-
state (Michigan portion)
125. South Central Michigan
126. Upper Michigan
TSP

X
so2

AR
AR

AR
AR
AR
N02

X" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS, but no call for
a SIP revision.

"AR" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS and a call for
a SIP revision for attainment and maintenance.

"MR" indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS, however, a SIP
revision for maintenance is necessary.

A blank indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS and no calls for
SIP revisions.
128
-------
MICHIGAN
Table's. STATUS OF SELECTED PORTIONS OF THE
STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SIP Portion
Status
New Source Review
EPA promulgation (10/72),
Transportation Measures
None required
Emission Limitations
Approved
Section 51.18 only because PSD is disapproved nationwide. See
section on new source review in SIP Overview for more details;
Table C. COMPARISON OF FY 1977 PROJECTED NEEDS AND
ACTUAL FY 1976 RESOURCES
Resources
Resource needs projected for FY 1977
Actual resources available in FY 1976
Man-years
267
157
Dollars (xlO3)
$5,730
4,388
129
-------
MICHIGAN
Table D. SUMMARY OF STATE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY .(June 30, 1976)'
MAJOR INSTALLATIONS
(Facilities capable
of emitting over
100 tons of a pol-
lutant each year)
455
Status with respect to emission
limits and/or compliance schedules
. In compliance
438
In violation
14
Unknown
3
INVESTIGATIONS OF COMPLIANCE STATUS 97/1/75 to 6/30/76)
V. Formal written inquiries 0
2. Field investigations 2,562
TOTAL
CASE DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS (7/1/75 to 6/30/76)
Ti Notices/citations of violation issued —
2. Administrative orders issued ,
3. Civil/criminal proceedings initiated....,
TOTAL
2,562
2,237
20
52

2,309
"Formal Reporting System - State Activity Report,"
EPA Office of Planning and Management,
Program Reporting Division, June 30, 1976.
Number represent,state and local enforcement activity.
130
-------
TABLE A
MINNESOTA
Attainment Status of National Ambient Air Quali.ty Standards

by Air Quality Control Region
" - — -__ Pollutant
AQCR ^-^—-^
127. Central Minnesota
128. Southeast Minnesota-La Crosse
Interstate (Minnesota portion
129. Duluth-Superior Interstate
(Minnesota portion)
130. Metropolitan Fargo-Moorhead
Interstate (Minnesota portion
131. Minneapolis-St. Paul
132. Northwest Minnesota
133. Southwest Minnesota
TSP

i
X
X
X
so2

Ox
Ak

AR
AR
AR
AR
AR
AR
N02

"X" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS, but no call for
a SIP revision.

"AR" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS and a call for
a SIP revision for attainment and maintenance.

"MR" indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS, however, a SIP
revision for maintenance is necessary.

A blank indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS and no calls for
SIP revisions.
131
-------
MINNESOTA

Table B. STATUS OF SELECTED PORTIONS OF THE
STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SIP Portion
Status
New Source Review
Approved
Transportation Measures
Measures for Minneapolis-St. Paul AQCR.
Emission Limitations
Approved
Section 51.18 only because PSD is disapproved nationwide. See
section on new source review in SIP Overview for more details..
Table C. COMPARISON OF FY 1977 PROJECTED NEEDS AND

ACTUAL FY 1976 RESOURCES
Resources
Resource needs projected for FY 1977
Actual resources available in FY 1976
Man-years
108
41
Dollars (xlO3)
$1,136
1,342
132
-------
MINNESOTA

Table D. SUMMARY OF STATE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY (June 30, 1976)a
MAJOR INSTALLATIONS
(Facilities capable
of emitting over
100 tons of a pol-
lutant each year)
392
Status with respect to emission
limits and/or compliance schedules
In compliance
355
In violation
20
Unknown
17
INVESTIGATIONS OF COMPLIANCE STATUS 97/1/75 to 6/30/76)
Ti Formal written inquiries .... 1,030
2. Field investigations. 638
TOTAL
CASE DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS (7/1/75 to 6/30/76)
1.•.Notices/citations of violation issued —
2. Administrative orders issued..
3. Civil/criminal proceedings initiated
1,668
No data
TOTAL
"Formal Reporting System - State Activity Report,"
EPA Office of Planning and Management,
Program Reporting Division, June 30, 1976.
Number represent state and local enforcement activity.
133
-------
TABLE A
OHIO
Attainment Status of National Ambient Air Quality Standards

by Air Quality Control Region
" ~~ — ^^_ Pollutant
AQCR "~"^^.
079. Metropolitan Cincinnati Inter
state (Ohio portion)
103. Huntington-Ashland-Portsmoutl-
Ironton Interstate (Ohio
portion)
124. Metropolitan Toledo Inter-
state (Ohio portion)
173. Dayton
174. Greater Metropolitan Clevelan
175. Mansfield-Marion
176. Metropolitan Columbus
177. Northwest Ohio
178. Northwest Pennsylvania-Youngs
town Interstate (Ohio portion
179. Parkersburg-Marietta Inter-
state (Ohio portion)
180. Sandusky
181 . Steubenville-Wierton-Wheeling
Interstate (Ohio portion)
TSP
X
X

X
X

X
X
X
X
X
X
so2

X
X

X
CO
X

X
AR
AR

Ox
AR
AR
AR
AR
AR
AR
AR
AR
AR
AR
AR
AR
N02

"X" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS, but no call for
a SIP revision.

"AR" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS and a call for
a SIP revision for attainment and maintenance.

by Air Quality Control Region
"" — — - — ^_ Pollutant
AQCR ^^_^^^^
182. Wilmington-Chillicothe-Logan
183. Zanesvi lie-Cambridge
TSP
X

so2

X
CO

-
Ox
AR
AR
N02

"X" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS, but no call for
a SIP revision.

"AR" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS and a call for
a SIP revision for attainment and maintenance.

"MR" indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS, however, a SIP
revision for maintenance is necessary.

A blank indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS and no calls for
SIP revisions.
135
-------
OHIO

Table B. STATUS OF SELECTED PORTIONS OF THE

• STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SIP Portion
Status
New Source Review
EPA promulgation (4/74)
Transportation Measures
Measures promulgated for Cincinnati
AQCR
Emission Limitations
HC strategy disapproved, S02 strategy
promulgated (8/76), approves for other
pol1utants.
aSectiori 51.18 only because PSD 1s disapproved nationwide. See
section on new source review 1n SIP Overview for more details.
Table C. COMPARISON OF FY 1977 PROJECTED NEEDS AND

ACTUAL FY 1976 RESOURCES
Resources
Resource needs projected for FY 1977
Actual resources available in FY 1976
Man-years
505
359
Dollars (xlO3)
$8,384
5,300
136
-------
OHIO

Table D. SUMMARY OF STATE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY (June 30, 1976)'
MAJOR INSTALLATIONS
(Facilities capable
of emitting over
100 tons of a pol-
lutant each year)
934
Status with respect to emission
limits and/or compliance schedules
In compliance
629
In violation
250
Unknown
55
INVESTIGATIONS OF COMPLIANCE STATUS 97/1/75 to 6/30/76J
T! Formal written inquiries °
2. Field investigations 5,802
TOTAL
CASE DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS (7/1/75 to 6/30/76)
TNotices/citations of violation issued...,
2. Administrative orders issued.
3.. Civil/criminal proceedings initiated....
5,802
No data
TOTAL
"Formal Reporting System - State Activity Report,"
EPA Office of Planning and Management,
Program Reporting Division, June 30, 1976.
Number represent state and local enforcement activity.
137
-------
TABLE A

WISCONSIN
Attainment Status of National Ambient Air Quality Standards

by Air Quality Control Region
" •*-— .^_ Pollutant
AQCR ^^^^^--^_
068. Metropolitan Dubuque Inter-
state (Wisconsin portion)
073 . Rockford-Janesvi 1 1 e-Bel oi t
Interstate (Wisconsin
portion)
128. Southeast Minnesota-La Crossc
Interstate (Wisconsin portior
129. Duluth-Superior Interstate
(Wisconsin portion)
237. Lake Michigan
238. North Central Wisconsin
239. Southeastern Wisconsin
240. Southern Wisconsin
TSP

) X

X
X
X
X
so2

AR
AR
AR
AR
AR
N02

"X" Indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS, but no call for
a SIP revision.

"AR" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS and a call for
a SIP revision for attainment and maintenance.

"MR" indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS, however, a SIP
revision for maintenance is necessary.

A blank indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS and no calls for
SIP revisions.
138
-------
WISCONSIN

Table B. STATUS OF SELECTED PORTIONS OF THE

STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SIP Portion
Status
New Source Review'
a
Approved
Transportation Measures
None required
Emission Limitations
Approved
aSection 51.18 only because PSD is disapproved nationwide. See
section on new source review in SIP Overview for more details.
Table C. COMPARISON OF FY 1977 PROJECTED NEEDS AND

ACTUAL FY 1976 RESOURCES
Resources
Resource needs projected for FY 1977
Actual resources available in FY 1976
Man-years
92
71
Dollars (xlO3)
$2,308
1,756
139
-------
WISCONSIN
Table D. SUMMARY OF STATE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY (June 30, 1976)'
MAJOR INSTALLATIONS
(Facilities capable
of emitting over
100 tons of a pol-
lutant each year)
373
Status with respect to emission
limits and/or compliance schedules
In compliance
360
In violation
12
Unknown
1
INVESTIGATIONS OF COMPLIANCE STATUS 97/1/75 to.6/30/76)
T. Formal written inquiries
2. Field investigations—
TOTAL
CASE DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS (7/1/75 to 6/30/76)
T Notices/citations of violation issued —
2. Administrative orders issued...
3. Civil/criminal proceedings initiated....
TOTAL
39
575
614
0
26
14
40
a"Formal Reporting System - State Activity Report,"
EPA Office of Planning and Management,
Program Reporting Division, June 30, 1976.
Number represent state and local enforcement activity.
140
-------
EPA REGION VI
141
ARKANSAS
LOUISIANA
NEW MEXICO
OKLAHOMA
TEXAS
-------
TABLE A

ARKANSAS
Attainment Status of National Ambient Air Quality Standards

by Air Quality Control Region
--*^_ Pollutant
AQCR "~^^---^_
016. Central Arkansas
017. Metropolitan Ft. Smith Inter-
state (Arkansas portion)
018. Metropolitan Memphis Inter-
state (Arkansas portion)
019. Monroe-El Dorado Interstate
(Arkansas portion)
020. Northeast Arkansas
021 . Northwest Arkansas
022. Shreveport-Texarkana-Tyler
Interstate (Arkansas portion)
TSP
AR

AR
AR

so2

N02

"X" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS, but no call for
a SIP revision.

"AR" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS and a call for
a SIP revision for attainment and maintenance.

"MR" indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS, however, a SIP
revision for maintenance is necessary.

A blank indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS and no calls for
SIP revisions.
142
-------
ARKANSAS
Table B. STATUS OF SELECTED PORTIONS OF THE
STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SIP Portion
Status
New Source Review
Approved
Transportation Measures
None required
Emission Limitations
Approved
Section 51.18 only because PSD is disapproved nationwide. See
section on new source review in SIP Overview for. more details.
Table C. COMPARISON OF FY 1977 PROJECTED NEEDS AND
ACTUAL FY 1976 RESOURCES
Resources
Resource needs projected for FY 1977
Actual resources available in FY 1976
Man-years
65
24
Dollars (xlO3) .
$1,226
711
143
-------
ARKANSAS
Table D. SUMMARY OF STATE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY (June 30, 1976)
MAJOR INSTALLATIONS
(Facilities capable
of emitting over
100 tons of a pol-
lutant each year)
49
Status with respect to emission
limits and/or compliance schedules
In. compliance
34
In violation
7
Unknown
8
INVESTIGATIONS OF COMPLIANCE STATUS 97/1/75 to 6/30/76)
Y.Formal written inquiries ..
2. Field investigations
1
86
TOTAL
CASE DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS (7/1/75 to 6/30/76)
Y.Notices/citations of violation issued —
2. Administrative orders issued —
3. Civil/criminal proceedings initiated
87
1
0
0
TOTAL
"Formal Reporting System - State Activity Report,"
EPA Office of Planning .and Management,
Program Reporting Division, June 30, 1976..
Number represent state and local enforcement activity.
144
-------
TABLE A
LOUISIANA
Attainment Status of National Ambient Air Quality Standards

by Air Quality Control Region
"""""" -— -^_ Pollutant
AQCR ~~^--^_
019. Monroe-El Dorado Interstate
(Louisiana portion)
022. Shreveport-Texarkana-Tyler
Interstate (Louisiana portior
106. Southern Louisiana-Southeast
Texas Interstate (Louisiana
portion)
TSP

) AR

so2

AR
N02

"X" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS, but no call for
a SIP revision.

"AR" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS and a call for
a SIP revision for attainment and maintenance.

"MR" indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS, however, a SIP
revision for maintenance is necessary.

A blank indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS and no calls for
SIP revisions.
145
-------
LOUISIANA

Table B. STATUS OF SELECTED PORTIONS OF THE

STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SIP Portion
Status
New.Source Review
Approved
Transportation Measures
None required
Emission Limitations
Approved
Section 51.18 only because PSD is disapproved nationwide. See
section on new source review in SIP Overview for more details.
Table C. COMPARISON OF FY 1977 PROJECTED NEEDS AND

ACTUAL FY 1976 RESOURCES
Resources
Resource needs projected for FY 1977
Actual resources available in FY 1976
Man -years
72
22
Dollars (xlO3)
$1 ,098
711
146
-------
LOUISIANA
Table D. SUMMARY OF STATE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY (June.30, 1976)'
MAJOR INSTALLATIONS
(Facilities capable
of emitting over
100 tons of a pol-
lutant each year)
425
Status with respect to emission
limits and/or compliance schedules
In compliance
341
In violation
64
Unknown
20
INVESTIGATIONS OF COMPLIANCE STATUS 97/1/75 to 6/30/76)
T! Formal written inquiries
2. Field investigations
TOTAL
CASE DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS (7/1/75 to 6/30/76)
1. Notices/citations of violation issued...;
2. Administrative orders issued
3. Civil/criminal proceedings init-iated
195
276
471
0
10
0
TOTAL
10.
Formal Reporting System - State Activity Report,"
EPA Office of Planning and Management,
Program Reporting Division, June 30, 1976.
Number represent state and local enforcement activity.
147
-------
TABLE A
NEW MEXICO
Attainment Status of National Ambient Air Quality Standards

by Air Quality Control Region
-- — ._ Pollutant
AQCR -"-^^
012. Arizona -New Mexico Southern
Border Interstate (New
Mexico portion)
014. Four Corners Interstate
(New Mexico portion)
152. Albuquerque-Mid Rio
153. El Paso-Las Cruces-Alamogordo
Interstate (New Mexico
portion)
154. Northeastern Plains
155. Pecos-Permian Basin
156. Southwestern Mountains-
Augustine Plains
157. Upper Rio Grande Valley
TSP
AR
AR
AR
AR

MR
so2
X

AR
AR
MR

AR
Ox

N02

"X" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS, but no call for
a SIP revision.

"AR" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS and a call for
a SIP revision for attainment and maintenance.

"MR" indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS, however, a SIP
revision for maintenance is necessary.

A blank indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS and no calls for
SIP revisions.
148
-------
NEW MEXICO

Table B. STATUS OF SELECTED PORTIONS OF THE

STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SIP Portion
Status
New Source Review
Approved
Transportation Measures
None required
Emission Limitations
Approval of S02 limits for coal burning
equipment on 2/24/76 because of court
action.
Section 51.18 only because PSD is disapproved nationwide. See
section on new source review in SIR Overview for more details.
Table C. COMPARISON OF FY 1977 PROJECTED NEEDS AMD

ACTUAL FY 1976 RESOURCES
Resources
Resource needs projected for FY 1977
Actual resources available in FY 1976
Man-years
56
43
Dollars (xlO3)
$1,197
934
149
-------
NEW MEXICO
Table D. SUMMARY OF STATE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY. (June 30, 1976)'
MAJOR INSTALLATIONS
(Facilities capable
of emitting over
100 tons of a pol-
lutant each year)
. 34
Status with respect to emission
limits and/or compliance schedules
In compliance
18
In violation
6
Unknown
10
INVESTIGATIONS OF COMPLIANCE STATUS 97/1/75 to 6/30/76)
T. Formal written inquiries.
2. Field investigations...;
TOTAL
CASE DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS (7/1/75 to 6/30/76)
T. Notices/citations of violation issued
2. Administrative orders issjued
3. Civil/criminal proceedings initiated ..
0
52
52
12
4
2
TOTAL
18
"Formal Reporting System - State Activity Report,"
EPA Office of Planning and Management,
Program Reporting Division,. June 30, 1976.
Number represent state and local enforcement activity.
150
-------
TABLE A
OKLAHOMA
Attainment Status of National Ambient Air Quality Standards
by Air Quality Control Region
"""" ~—*^_ Pollutant
AQCR — UI^
017. Metropolitan Ft. Smith
Interstate (Oklahoma portion'
022. Shreveport-Texarkana-Tyler
Interstate (Oklahoma portion)
184. Central Oklahoma
185. North Central Oklahoma
186. Northeastern Oklahoma
187. Northwestern Oklahoma
188. Southeastern Oklahoma
189. Southwestern Oklahoma
TSP

X
'
X
X

so2

N02

None required
Emission Limitations
Approved
aSection 51.18 only because PSD is disapproved nationwide. See
section on new source review in SIP Overview for more details.
Table C. COMPARISON OF FY. 1977 PROJECTED NEEDS AND
ACTUAL FY 1976 RESOURCES
Resources
Resource needs projected for FY 1977
Actual resources available in FY 1976
Man-years
120
57
Dollars (xlO3)
$1,478
1,036
152
-------
OKLAHOMA

Table D. SUMMARY'OF STATE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY (June 30, 1976)'
MAJOR INSTALLATIONS
(Facilities capable
of emitting over
100 tons of a pol-
lutant each year)
120
Status with respect to emission
limits and/or compliance schedules
In compliance
103
In violation
12
Unknown
5
INVESTIGATIONS OF COMPLIANCE STATUS 97/1/75 to 6/30/76)
Y.Formal written inquiries
2. Field investigations
TOTAL
CASE DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS (7/1/75 to .6/30/76)
Y. Notices/citations of violation issued —
2. Administrative orders issued ,
3. Civil/criminal proceedings initiated
46
229
275
15
2
2
TOTAL
19
a"Formal Reporting System - State Activity Report,"
EPA Office of Planning and Management,
Program Reporting Division, June 30, 1976.
Number represent state and local enforcement activity.
153
-------
TABLE A

TEXAS
Attainment Status of National Ambient Air Quality Standards

by Air Quality Control Region
"""" -— *^^ Pollutant
AQCR ^^^^^^
022. Shreveport-Texarkana-Tyler
Interstate (Texas portion)
106. Southern Louisiana-Southeast
Texas Interstate (Texas
portion)
153. El Paso-Las Cruces-Alamogordo
Interstate (Texas portion)
210. Abilene-Wichita Falls
211. Amarillo-Lubbock
212. Austin-Waco
213. Brownsville-Laredo
214. Corpus Christi -Victoria
215. Metropolitan Dallas-Fort
Worth
216. Metropolitan Houston-
Gal veston
217. Metropolitan San Antonio
218. Midland-Odessa-San Angel o
TSP

MR
AR

AR
AR
AR
AR
AR

so2

X
X

X
X
X
X

N02

"X" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS, but no call for
a SIP revision.

"AR" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS and a call for
a SIP revision for attainment and maintenance.

"MR" indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS, however, a SIP
revision for maintenance is necessary.

A blank indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS and no calls for
SIP revisions.
154
-------
TEXAS

Table B. STATUS OF SELECTED PORTIONS OF THE

STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SIP Portion
Status
New Source Review
Approved
Transportation Measures
Emission Limitations
Measures being prepared for Austin-Waco,
Corpus Christl, Houston-Galveston, Dallas,
San Antonio, El Paso.

Stage I HC regulations for Houston-Galveston,
Dallas-Ft. Worth, and San Antonio AQCRs went
into effect 8/31/76.
Section 51.18 only because PSD is disapproved nationwide. See
section on new source review in SIP Overview for more details.
Table C. COMPARISON OF FY 1977 PROJECTED NEEDS AND

ACTUAL FY 1976 RESOURCES
Resources
Resource needs projected for FY 1977
Actual resources available in FY 1976
Man-years
876
474
Dollars (xlO3)
$17,514
9,963
155
-------
TEXAS
Table D. SUMMARY OF STATE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY (June 30, 1976)'
MAJOR INSTALLATIONS
(Facilities capable
of emitting over
100 tons of a pol-
lutant each year)
1,135
Status with respect to emission
limits and/or compliance schedules
In compliance
1 ,046
In violation
52
Unknown
37
INVESTIGATIONS OF COMPLIANCE STATUS 97/1/75 to 6/30/76)
T.Formal written inquiries
2. Field investigations '.
TOTAL
CASE DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS (7/1/75 to 6/30/76)
T. Notices/citations of violation issued —
2. Administrative orders-issued
3. Civil/criminal proceedings, initiated
TOTAL
22
1,079

"1,101
238
2
3

243
"Formal Reporting System - State Activity Report,"
EPA Office of Planning and Management,
Program Reporting Division, June 30, 1976.
Number represent state and local enforcement activity.
156
-------
EPA REGION VII
IOWA

KANSAS

MISSOURI

NEBRASKA
157
-------
TABLE A
IOWA
Attainment Status of National Ambient Air Quality Standards
by Air Quality Control Region
~~ •— -^_ Pollutant
AQCR """^^ ^^
065. Burlington-Keokuk Interstate
(Iowa portion)
068. Metropolitan Dubuque Inter-
state (Iowa portion)
069. Metropolitan Quad Cities
(Iowa portion)
085. Metropolitan Omaha-Council
Bluffs Interstate (Iowa
portion)
086. Metropolitan Sioux City
Interstate (Iowa portion)
087. Metropolitan Sioux Falls
Interstate (Iowa portion)
088. Northeast Iowa
089. North Central Iowa
090. Northwest Iowa
091 . Southeast Iowa
092. South Central Iowa
093. Southwest Iowa
TSP
X

AR
AR
X
X
AR
X

X
AR

so2

X
X

N0£

Table B. .STATUS OF SELECTED PORTIONS OF THE

STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SIP Portion
Status
New Source Review
Transportation Measures
Emission Limitations
Approved

None required

Approved
Section 51.18 only because PSD is disapproved nationwide. See
section on new source review in SIP Overview for more details.
Table C. COMPARISON OF FY 1977 PROJECTED NEEDS AND

ACTUAL FY 1976 RESOURCES
Resources
Resource needs projected for FY 1977
Actual resources available in FY 1.97&
Man-years
68
42
Dollars (xlO3)
$1 ,073
998
159
-------
IOWA
Table D. SUMMARY OF STATE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY (June 30, 1976)'
MAJOR INSTALLATIONS
(Facilities capable
of emitting over
TOO tons of a pol-
lutant each year)
392
Status with respect to emission
limits' and/or compliance schedules
In compliance
244
In violation
9
Unknown
139
INVESTIGATIONS OF COMPLIANCE STATUS 97/1/75 to 6/30/76)
T~Formal written inquiries 4
2. Field investigations 1,523
TOTAL
CASE DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS (7/T/75 to 6/30/76)
T! Notices/citations of violation issued —
2. Administrative orders issued
3. Civil/criminal proceedings initiated
TOTAL
1,527
219
25
1

245
"Formal Reporting System - State Activity Report,"
EPA Office of Planning and Management,
Program Reporting Division, June 30, 1976.
Number represent state and local enforcement activity.
160
-------
TABLE A
KANSAS
Attainment Status of National Ambient Air Quality Standards
by Air Quality Control Region
" •— - --^_ Pollutant
AQCR ^-^^^^^
094. Metropolitan Kansas City
Interstate (Kansas portion)
095. Northeast Kansas
096. North Central Kansas
097. Northwest Kansas
098. Southeast Kansas
099. South Central Kansas
100. Southwest Kansas
TSP
AR
X
X
X

so2

CO
X
X

Ox
X

N0£

"X" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS, but no call for
a SIP revision.
"AR" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS and a call for
a SIP revision for attainment and maintenance.
"MR" indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS, however, a SIP
revision for maintenance is necessary.
A blank indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS and no calls for
SIP revisions.
161
-------
KANSAS
Table B. STATUS OF SELECTED PORTIONS OF THE
STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SIP Portion
Status
New Source Review
Approved
Transportation Measures
None required
Emission Limitations
Approved
aSection 51.18 only because PSD is disapproved nationwide. See
section on new source review in SIP Overview for more details.
Table C. COMPARISON OF FY 1977 PROJECTED NEEDS AND
ACTUAL FY 1976 RESOURCES
Resources
Resource .needs projected for FY 1977
Actual resources available in FY 1976
Man-years
52
45
Dollars (xlO3)
$868
824
162
-------
KANSAS
Table D. SUMMARY OF STATE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY (June 30, 1976)c
MAJOR INSTALLATIONS
[Facilities capable
of emitting over
100 tons of a pol-
lutant each year)
669
Status with respect to emission
limits and/or compliance schedules
In compliance
666
In violation
1
Unknown
2
INVESTIGATIONS OF COMPLIANCE STATUS 97/1/75 to 6/30/76)
T^ Formal written inquiries 13
2. Field investigations • 4,901
TOTAL
CASE DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS (7/1/75 to 6/30/76)
1. Notices/citations of violation issued...,
2. Administrative orders issued
3. Civil/criminal proceedings initiated
TOTAL
4,914
106
106
2

214
"Formal Reporting System - State Activity Report,"
EPA Office of Planning and Management,
Program Reporting Division, June 30, 1976.
Number represent state and local enforcement activity.
163
-------
TABLE A
MISSOURI
Attainment Status of National Ambient Air Quali.ty Standards

by Air Quality Control Region
~~""" • Pollutant
AQCR ~^^--^
070. Metropolitan St. Louis Inter-
state (Missouri portion)
TSP

AR
094. Metropolitan Kansas City
Interstate (Missouri portion)
537. Northern Missouri
138. Southeast Missouri
139. Southwest Missouri
AR
X

so2

NOz

"X" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS, but no call for
a SIP revision.

"AR" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS and a call for
a SIP revision for attainment and maintenance.

"MR" indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS, however, a SIP
revision for maintenance is necessary.

A blank indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS and no calls for
SIP revisions.
164
-------
MISSOURI

Table B. STATUS OF SELECTED PORTIONS OF THE

STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SIP Portion
Status
New Source Review
Approved
Transportation Measures
Measures submitted for St. Louis AQCR.
Additional measures still required.
Emission Limitations
Approved
aSection .51.18 only because PSD is disapproved nationwide. See
section on new source review in SIP Overview for more details.
Table C. COMPARISON OF FY 1977 PROJECTED NEEDS AND

ACTUAL FY 1976 RESOURCES
Resources
Resource needs projected for FY 1977
Actual resources available in FY 1976
Man-years
231
115
Dollars (xlO3)
$3,854
2,146
165
-------
MISSOURI
Table D. SUMMARY.OF STATE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY (June 30, 1976)'
MAJOR INSTALLATIONS
(Facilities capable
of emitting over
100 tons of a pol-
lutant each year)
259
. Status with respect to emission
limits and/or compliance schedules
. In compliance
246
In violation
13
Unknown
0
•INVESTIGATIONS OF COMPLIANCE STATUS 97/1/75 to 6/30/76)
Y.Formal written inquiries °9
2. Field investigations 9>054
TOTAL
CASE DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS (7/1/75 to 6/30/76)
Y. Notices/citations of violation issued —
2. Administrative orders issued..., —
3. Civil/criminal proceedings initiated
9,123
709
33
247
TOTAL
989
"Formal Reporting System - State Activity Report,",
EPA Office of Planning and Management,
Program Reporting Division, June 30, 1976.
Number represent state and local enforcement activity.
166
-------
TABLE A
NEBRASKA
Attainment Status of National Ambient Air Quality Standards
by Air Quality Control Region
*~~^~~^-^^_ Pollutant
AQCR — ~^-^
085. Metropolitan Omaha-Council
Bluffs" Interstate (Nebraska
portion)
086. Metropolitan Sioux City
145. Lincoln-Beatrice-Fairbury
146. Nebraska
TSP

AR
X
X
X
so2

N0£

"X" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS, but no call for
a SIP revision.
"AR" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS and a call for
a SIP revision for attainment and maintenance.
"MR" indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS, however, a SIP
revision for maintenance is necessary.
A blank indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS and no calls for
SIP revisions.
167
-------
NEBRASKA
Table B. STATUS OF SELECTED PORTIONS OF THE
STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SIP Portion
Status
New Source Review
Approved
Transportation Measures
None required
Emission Limitations
Approved
Section 51.18 only because PSD is disapproved nationwide. See
section on new source review in SIP Overview for more details.
Table C. COMPARISON OF FY 1977 PROJECTED NEEDS AND
ACTUAL FY 1976 RESOURCES
Resources
Resource needs projected for FY 1977
Actual resources available in FY 1976
Man-years
48
35
Dollars (xTO3)
$856
583
168
-------
NEBRASKA
Table D. SUMMARY OF STATE ENFORCEMENT'ACTIVITY (June 30, 1976)'
MAJOR INSTALLATIONS
(Facilities capable
of emitting over
100 tons of a pol-
lutant each year)
390
Status with respect to emission
limits and/or compliance schedules
In compliance
325
In violation
9
Unknown
56
INVESTIGATIONS O.F COMPLIANCE STATUS 97/1/75 to 6/30/76)
T! Formal written inquiries
2. Field investigations
TOTAL
CASE DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS (7/1/75 to 6/30/76)
Y. Notices/citations of violation issued —
2. Administrative orders issued. ,
3. Civil/criminal proceedings initiated
TOTAL
109
1,135

1,244
149
'10
4

163
a"Formal Reporting System - State Activity Report,"
EPA Office of Planning and Management,
Program Reporting Division, June 30, 1976.
Number represent state and local enforcement activity.
169
-------
EPA REGION VIII
COLORADO
MONTANA
NORTH DAKOTA
SOUTH DAKOTA
UTAH
WYOMING
171
-------
TABLE A

COLORADO
Attainment Status of National Ambient Air Quality Standards

by Air Quality Control Region
~"~~~---— -^_ Pollutant
AQCR ^
014. Four Corners Interstate
(Colorado Portion)
034. Comanche
035. Grand Mesa
036. Metropolitan Denver
037. Pawnee
038. San Isabel
039. San Luis
040. Yampa
TSP

AR
AR
AR
AR

so2

AR
AR

N02

"X" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS, but no call for
a SIP revision.

"AR" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS and a call for
a SIP revision for attainment and maintenance.

"MR" indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS, however, a SIP
revision for maintenance is necessary.

A blank indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS and no calls for
SIP revisions.
172
-------
COLORADO

Table B. STATUS OF. SELECTED PORTIONS OF THE

STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SIP Portion
Status
New Source Review
Approved
Transportation Measures
Measures promulgated for Denver AQCR.
Emission Limitations
Approved
aSection 51.18 only because PSD is disapproved nationwide. See
section on new source review in SIP Overview for more details.
Table C. COMPARISON OF FY 1977 PROJECTED NEEDS AMD

ACTUAL FY 1976 RESOURCES
Resources
Resource needs projected for FY 1977
Actual resources available in FY 1976
Man -years
109
91
Dollars (xlO3)
$2,278
1,778
173
-------
COLORADO
Table D. SUMMARY OF STATE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY (June 30, 1976)'
MAJOR INSTALLATIONS
(Facilities capable
of emitting over
100 tons of; a pol-
lutant each year)
302
Status with respect to emission
limits and/or compliance schedules
In compliance
294
In violation
7
Unknown
1
INVESTIGATIONS OF COMPLIANCE STATUS 97/1/75 to 6/30/76)
T! Formal written inquiries
2. Field investigations
TOTAL
CASE DEVELOPMENT.ACTIONS (7/1/75 to 6/30/.76)
T.Notices/citations of violation issued...
2. Administrative orders issued
3. Civil/criminal proceedings initiated....
4
981
985
31
15
1
TOTAL
47
"Formal Reporting System - State Activity Report,"
EPA Office of Planning and Management,
Program Reporting Division, June 30, 1976.
Number represent state and local enforcement activity.
174
-------
TABLE A
MONTANA
Attainment Status of National Ambient Air Quality Standards

by Air Quality Control Region
~~— -— -^_ Pollutant
AQCR — ~~^~-^
140. Billings
141. Great Falls
142. Helena
143. Miles City
144. Missoula
TSP
AR
X
X
AR
AR
so2
AR

CO
AR

N02

"X" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS, but no call for
a SIP revision.

"AR" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS and a call for
a SIP revision for attainment and maintenance.

"MR" indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS, however, a SIP
revision for maintenance is necessary.

A blank indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS and no calls for
SIP revisions.
175
-------
MONTANA

Table B. STATUS OF SELECTED PORTIONS OF THE

STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN .
SIP Portion
Status
New Source Review
Approved
Transportation Measures
None required
Emission Limitations
Proposal for S02 (10/75), approved for
other pollutants. .
Section 51.18 only because PSD is disapproved nationwide. See
section on new source review in SIP Overview for more details.
Table C. COMPARISON OF FY 1977 PROJECTED NEEDS AND

ACTUAL FY 1976 RESOURCES
Resources
Resource needs projected -for FY 1977
Actual resources available in FY 1976
Man-years
30
31
Dollars (xlO3)
$705
556
176
-------
MONTANA
Table D. SUMMARY OF STATE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY (June 30, 1976)'
MAJOR INSTALLATIONS
(Facilities capable
of emitting over
100 tons of a pol-
lutant each year)
48
Status with respect to emission
limits and/or compliance schedules
In compliance
40
In violation
7
Unknown
1
INVESTIGATIONS OF COMPLIANCE STATUS 97/1/75 to 6/30/76)
V. Formal written inquiries
2. Field investigations
TOTAL
CASE'DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS (7/1/75 to 6/30/76)
T. Notices/citations of violation issued —
2. Administrative orders issued
3. Civil/criminal proceedings initiated....
0
362
362
18
10
1
TOTAL
29
a"Formal Reporting System - State Activity Report,"
EPA Office.of Planning and Management,
Program Reporting Division, June 30, 1976.
Number represent state and local enforcement activity.
177
-------
TABLE A
NORTH DAKOTA
Attainment Status of National Ambient Air Quality Standards

by Air Quality Control Region
— -~~^_ Pollutant
AQCR ' — ^-^^^
130. Metropolitan Fargo-Moorhead
Interstate (North Dakota
portion)
172. North Dakota"
TSP

so2

N02

"X" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS, but no call for
a SIP revision.

"AR" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS and a call for
a SIP revision for attainment and maintenance.

"MR" indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS, however, a SIP
revision for maintenance is necessary.

A blank indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS and no calls for
SIP revisions.
-------
NORTH DAKOTA

Table B. STATUS OF SELECTED PORTIONS OF THE

STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SIP Portion
Status
New Source Review9
Approved
Transportation Measures
None required
Emission Limitations
Approved
aSection 51.18 only because PSD is disapproved nationwide. See
section on new source review in SIP Overview for more details.
Table C. COMPARISON OF FY 1977 PROJECTED NEEDS AND

ACTUAL FY 1976 RESOURCES
Resources
Resource needs projected for FY 1977
Actual resources available in FY 1976
Man-years
23
11
Dollars (xlO3)
$256
228
179
-------
NORTH DAKOTA

Table D. SUMMARY OF STATE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY (June 30, 1976)a
MAJOR INSTALLATIONS
(Facilities capable
of emitting over
100 tons of a pol-
lutant each year)
47
Status with respect to emission
limits and/or compliance schedules
In compliance
26 .
In violation
21
Unknown
0
INVESTIGATIONS OF COMPLIANCE STATUS 97/1/75 to 6/30/76)
TT Formal written inquiries.
2. Field .investigations
TOTAL
CASE DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS (7/1/75 to 6/30/76)
T Notices/citations of violation issued
2. Administrative orders issued ,
3. Civil/criminal proceedings initiated
14
174
188
9
10
0
TOTAL
19
"Formal Reporting System - State Activity Report,"
EPA Office of Planning and Management,
Program Reporting Division, June 30, 1976.
Number represent state and local enforcement activity.
180
-------
TABLE A
SOUTH DAKOTA
Attainment Status of National Ambient Air Quality Standards

by Air Quality Control Region
' — — ^_ Pollutant
AQCR ' ^^-^_
086. Metropolitan Sioux City
Interstate (South Dakota
portion)
087. Metropolitan Sioux Falls
Interstate (South Dakota
portion)
205. Black Hills-Rapid City
206. South Dakota
TSP

MR
AR

so2

N02

"X" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS, but no call for
a SIP revision.

"AR" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS and a call for
a SIP revision for attainment and maintenance.

"MR" indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS, however, a SIP
revision for maintenance is necessary.

A blank indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS and no calls for
SIP revisions.
181
-------
SOUTH DAKOTA
Table B. STATUS OF SELECTED PORTIONS OF THE
STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SIP Portion
Status
New Source Review
Approved
Transportation Measures
None required
Emission Limitations
Approved
aSection 51.18 only because PSD is disapproved nationwide. See
section on new source review in SIP Overview for more details.
Table C. COMPARISON OF FY 1977 PROJECTED .NEEDS AND
ACTUAL FY 1976 RESOURCES
Resources
Resource needs projected for FY 1977
Actual resources available in FY 1976
Man-years
13
7
Dollars (xlO3)
$245
136
182
-------
SOUTH DAKOTA

Table D. SUMMARY OF STATE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY (June 30, 1976)a
MAJOR INSTALLATIONS
(Facilities capable
of emitting over
100 tons of a pol-
lutant each year)
46
Status with respect to emission
limits and/or compliance schedules
In compliance
8
In violation
35
Unknown
3
INVESTIGATIONS OF COMPLIANCE STATUS 97/1/75 to 6/30/76)
T! Formal written inquiries.,
2. Field investigations
TOTAL
CASE DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS (7/1/75 to 6/30/76)
T Notices/citations of violation issued —
2.- Administrative orders issued ,
3. .Civil/criminal proceedings initiated
TOTAL
a"Formal Reporting System - State Activity Report,"
EPA Office of Planning and Management,
Program Reporting Division, June 30, 1976.
Number represent state and local enforcement activity.
0
154
154
2
5
0
183
-------
TABLE A
UTAH
Attainment Status of National Ambient Air Quality Standards

by Air Quality Control Region
~^—~ ^_ Pollutant
AQCR — "^--^
014. Four Corners Interstate
(Utah portion)
219. Utah
220. Wasatch Front
TSP

AR
AR
so2

N0£

"X" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS, but no call for
a SIP revision.

"AR" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS and a call for
a SIP revision for attainment and maintenance.

"MR" indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS, however, a SIP
revision for maintenance is necessary.

A blank indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS and no calls for
SIP revisions.
184
-------
UTAH

Table B. STATUS OF SELECTED PORTIONS OF THE

STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SIP Portion
Status
New Source Review
Transportation Measures
Emission Limitations
EPA promulgation of public comment
provisions for NSR regulations for
Wasatch Front AQCR.

EPA promulgation for Wasatch Front
AQCR (11/73).

EPA promulgations for S09 and TSP
(10/74 and 9/74), TSP promulgation
(smelter) 11/75, approved for other
pollutants.
aSection 51.18 only because PSD is disapproved nationwide. See
section on new source review in SIP Overview for more details.
Table C. COMPARISON OF FY 1977 PROJECTED NEEDS AND

ACTUAL FY 1976 RESOURCES
Resources
Resource needs projected for FY 1977
Actual resources available in FY 1976
Man-years
38
23
Dollars (xlO3)
$636
517
185
-------
UTAH

Table D. SUMMARY OF STATE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY (June 30, 1976)'
MAJOR INSTALLATIONS
(Facilities capable
of emitting over
.100 tons of a pol-
lutant each year)
94
Status with respect to emission
limits and/or compliance schedules
In compliance
77
In violation
15
Unknown
2
INVESTIGATIONS OF COMPLIANCE STATUS 97/1/75 to 6/30/76)
Ti Formal written inquiries
2. Field investigations..
TOTAL
CASE DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS (7/1/75 to 6/30/76)
T^ Notices/citations of violation issued —
2. Administrative orders issued ,
3. Civil/criminal proceedings initiated
503
504
16
4
2
TOTAL
22
"Formal Reporting System - State Activity Report,"
EPA Office of Planning and Management,
Program Reporting Division, June 30, 1976.
Number represent state and local enforcement activity.
186
-------
TABLE A

WYOMING
Attainment Status of National Ambient Air Quali.ty Standards

by Air Quality Control Region
""""" *-— ^_ Pollutant
AQCR ~~^^--^_
241 . Casper
242. Metropolitan Cheyenne
243. Wyoming
TSP

AR
so2

N02

"X" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS, but no call for
a SIP revision.

"AR" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS and a call for
a SIP revision for attainment and maintenance.

"MR" indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS, however, a SIP
revision for maintenance is necessary.

A blank indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS and no calls for
SIP revisions.
187
-------
WYOMING
Table B. STATUS OF SELECTED PORTIONS OF THE
. STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SIP Portion
Status
New Source Review
Approved
Transportation Measures
Emission Limitations
None required

Approved
aSection 51.18 only because PSD is disapproved nationwide. See
section on new source review in SIP Overview for more details.
Table C. COMPARISON. OF FY 1977 PROJECTED NEEDS AND
ACTUAL FY 1976 RESOURCES
Resources
Resource needs projected for FY 1977
Actual resources available in FY 1976
Man-years
19
15
Dollars (xlO3)
$360
358
-------
WYOMING

Table D. SUMMARY OF STATE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY (June 30, 1976)*
MAJOR INSTALLATIONS
(Facilities capable
, of emitting over
100 tons of a pol-
lutant each year)
77
Status with respect to emission
limits and/or compliance schedules
In compliance
73
In violation
4
Unknown
0
INVESTIGATIONS OF COMPLIANCE STATUS 97/1/75 to 6/30/76)
V. Formal written inquiries
2. Field investigations
5
417
TOTAL
CASE DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS (7/1/75 to 6/30/76)
Ti Notices/citations of violation issued
2. Administrative orders issued ,
3. Civil/criminal proceedings initiated
422
5
0
0
TOTAL
"Formal Reporting System - State Activity .Report,"
EPA Office of Planning and Management,
Program Reporting Division, June 30, 1976.
Number represent state and local enforcement activity.
189
-------
EPA REGION IX
AMERICAN SAMOA
ARIZONA
CALIFORNIA
GUAM
HAWAII
NEVADA
191
-------
TABLE A

AMERICAN SAMOA
Attainment Status of National Ambient Air Quality Standards

by Air Quality Control Region
AQCR
Pollutant
TSP
so2
CO
245. American Samoa
"X" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS, but no call for
a SIP revision.

"AR" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS and a call for
a SIP revision for attainment and maintenance.

"MR" indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS, however, a SIP
revision for maintenance is necessary.

A blank indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS and no calls for
SIP revisions.
192
-------
AMERICAN SAMOA
Table B. STATUS OF SELECTED PORTIONS OF THE
STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SIP Portion
Status
New Source Review
Approved
Transportation Measures
None required
Emission Limitations
Approved
Section 51.18 only because PSD is disapproved nationwide. See
section on new source review in SIP Overview for more details.
Table C. COMPARISON OF FY 1977 PROJECTED NEEDS AND
ACTUAL FY 1976 RESOURCES
Resources
Resource needs projected for FY 1977
Actual resources available in FY 1976
Man-years

Dollars (xlO3)

193
-------
AMERICAN SAMOA

Table D. SUMMARY OF STATE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY (June 30, 1976)'
MAJOR INSTALLATIONS
(Facilities capable
of emitting over
100 tons of a pol-
lutant each year)
No data
Status with respect to emission
limits and/or compliance schedules
In compliance
-
In violation
-
Unknown
-
INVESTIGATIONS OF COMPLIANCE. STATUS 97/1/75 to 6/30/76)
Y.Formal written inquiries—........*..
2. Field investigations ....
No data
TOTAL
CASE DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS (7/1/75 to 6/30/76)
Y.Notices/citations of violation issued —
2. Administrative orders issued
3. Civil/criminal proceedings initiated
No data
TOTAL
"Formal Reporting System - State Activity Report,"
EPA Office of Planning and Management,
Program Reporting Division, June 30, 1976.
Number represent state and local enforcement activity.
194
-------
TABLE A
ARIZONA
Attainment Status of National Ambient Air Quality Standards
by Air Quality Control Region
" --^_ Pollutant
AQCR "^^-^
012. Arizona-New Mexico-Southern
Border Interstate (Arizona
portion)
013. Clark-Mohave Interstate
(Arizona portion)
014. Four Corners Interstate
(Arizona portion)
015. Phoenix-Tucson
TSP

X
X
so2

z
CO

AR
Ox

AR
N02

Table B. STATUS OF SELECTED PORTIONS OF THE

STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SIP Portion
Status
New Source Review
Approved, except for Pima County.
Transportation Measures
Measures in effect for Phoenix-Tucson
AQCR.
Emission Limitations
EPA promulgations for S02 (3/73 and 3/74),
TSP (5/73), proposal for S02 from
smelters (10/75), approved for other
pollutants.
Section 51.18 only because PSD is disapproved nationwide. See
section on new source review in SIP Overview for more details.
Table C. COMPARISON OF FY 1977 PROJECTED NEEDS AND

ACTUAL FY 1976 RESOURCES
Resources
Resource needs projected for FY 1977
Actual resources available in FY 1976
Man-years
130
66
Dollars (xlO3)
$1,914
1,788
196
-------
ARIZONA
Table D. SUMMARY OF. STATE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY (June 30, 1976)c
MAJOR INSTALLATIONS
(Facilities capable
of emitting over
100 tons of a pol-
lutant each year)
394
Status with respect to emission
limits and/or compliance schedules
In compliance
371
In violation
10
Unknown
13
INVESTIGATIONS OF COMPLIANCE STATUS 97/1/75 to 6/30/76)
T. Formal written inquiries . 2
2. Field investigations 6,258
TOTAL
CASE DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS (7/1/75 to 6/30/76)
Y. Notices/citations of violation issued
2. Administrative orders issued.... ,
3. Civil/criminal proceedings initiated
TOTAL
6,260
103
2
38

143
Formal Reporting System - State Activity Report,"
EPA Office of Planning and Management,
Program Reporting Division, June 30, 1976.
Number represent state and local enforcement activity.
197
-------
TABLE A
CALIFORNIA
Attainment Status of National Ambient Air Quality Standards

by Air Quality Control Region
"~ -^_ Pollutant
AQCR ~~~"~~^^^_
023. Great Basin Valley
024. Metropolitan Los Angeles
025. North Central Coast
026. North Coast
027. Northeast Plateau
028. Sacramento Valley
029. San Diego
030. San Franscisco Bay Area
031. San Joaquin Valley
032. South Central Coast
033. Southeast Desert
TSP

AR
X
X
X
AR
AR
AR
AR
X
AR
so2

AR
AR
AR
AR

X
X

X
X
X
X
X
X
N02

"X" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS, but.no call for
a SIP revision.

"AR" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS and a call for
a SIP revision for attainment and maintenance.

"MR" indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS, however, a SIP
revision for maintenance is necessary.

A blank indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS and no calls for
SIP revisions.
198
-------
CALIFORNIA

Table B. STATUS OF SELECTED PORTIONS OF THE

STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SIP Portion
Status
New Source Review
Transportation Measures
Emission Limitations
EPA promulgation (4/73) for part of state.

Measures in effect for San Diego, Los Angeles,
San Joaquin Valley, Sacramento Valley and San
Francisco Bay Area AQCRs. Extension of final
compliance date for Stage I vapor recovery con-
trols on 3/4/76 for specified sources.
EPA proposals for TSP (9/22/72), approved for
other pollutants.
aSection 51.18 only because PSD is disapproved nationwide. See
section on new source review in SIP Overview for more details.
Table C. COMPARISON OF FY 1977 PROJECTED NEEDS AND

ACTUAL FY 1976 RESOURCES
Resources
Resource needs projected for FY 1977
Actual resources available in FY 1976
Man-years
1,270
1,184
Dollars (xlO3)
$34,870
31,044
199
-------
CALIFORNIA

Table D. SUMMARY OF STATE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY (June 30, 1976)a
MAJOR INSTALLATIONS
(Facilities capable
of emitting over
100 tons of a pol-
lutant each year)
1,637
Status with respect to emission
limits and/or compliance schedules
In compliance
1,545
In violation
34
Unknown
58
INVESTIGATIONS OF COMPLIANCE STATUS 97/1/75 to 6/30/76)
T Formal written inquiries
2. Field investigations
TOTAL
CASE DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS (7/1/75 to 6/30/76)
1. Notices/citations of violation issued —
2. Administrative orders issued
3. Civil/criminal proceedings initiated
TOTAL
8,304
52,105

60,409
4,398
13
1,602

6,013
a"Formal Reporting System - State Activity Report,"
EPA Office of Planning and Management,
Program Reporting Division, June 30, 1976.
Number represent state and local enforcement activity.
200
-------
TABLE A
GUAM
Attainment Status of National Ambient Air Quality Standards

by Air Quality Control Region
AQCR
Pollutant
TSP
SO,
CO
N02
246. Guam
"X" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS, but no call for
a SIP revision.

"AR" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS and a call for
a SIP revision for attainment and maintenance.

"MR" indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS, however, a SIP
revision for maintenance is necessary.

A blank indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS and no calls for
SIP revisions.
201
-------
GUAM
Table B. STATUS OF SELECTED PORTIONS OF THE
STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SIP Portion
Status
New Source Review
Approved
Transportation Measures
None required
Emission Limitations
Approved
Section 51.18 only because PSD is disapproved nationwide. See
section on new source review in SIP Overview for more details.
Table C. COMPARISON OF FY 1977 PROJECTED NEEDS AND
ACTUAL FY 1976 RESOURCES
Resources
Resource needs projected for FY 1977
Actual resources available in FY 1976
Man-years
8
8
Dollars (xlO3)
$143
119
202
-------
GUAM
Table D. SUMMARY OF STATE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY (June 30, 1976)'
MAJOR INSTALLATIONS
(Facilities capable
of emitting over
100 tons of a pol-
lutant each year)
8
Status with respect to emission
limits and/or compliance schedules
In compliance.
4
In violation
4
Unknown
0
INVESTIGATIONS OF COMPLIANCE STATUS 97/1/75 to 6/30/76)
Y.Formal written inquiries
2. Field investigations....
0
44
TOTAL
CASE DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS (7/1/75 to 6/30/76)
Y.Notices/citations of violation issued...
2. Administrative orders issued.... ,
3. Civil/criminal proceedings initiated.—
44
No data
TOTAL
"Formal Reporting System - State Activity Report,"
EPA Office of Planning and Management,
Program Reporting Division, June 30, 1976.
Number represent state and local enforcement activity.
203
-------
TABLE A

HAWAII
Attainment Status of National Ambient Air Quality Standards

by Air Quality Control Region
AQCR
Pollutant
TSP
SO,
CO
N02
060. Hawaii
AR
1,,
X" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS, but no call for
a SIP revision.

"AR" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS and a call for
a SIP revision for attainment and maintenance.

"MR" indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS, however, a SIP
revision for maintenance is necessary.

A blank indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS and no calls for
SIP revisions.
204
-------
HAWAII

Table B. STATUS OF SELECTED PORTIONS OF THE

STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SIP Portion
Status
New Source Review
Approved
Transportation Measures
None required
Emission Limitations
Approved
Section 51.18 only because PSD is disapproved nationwide. See
section on new source revisw in SIP Overview for more details.
Table C. COMPARISON OF FY. 1977 PROJECTED NEEDS AND.

ACTUAL FY 1976 RESOURCES
Resources
Resource needs projected for FY 1.977
Actual resources available in FY 1976
Man-years
29
12
Dollars (xlO3)
$420
407
205
-------
HAWAII

Table.D. SUMMARY OF STATE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY (June 30, 1976)*
MAJOR INSTALLATIONS
(Facilities capable
of emitting over
100 tons of a pol-
lutant each year)
96
Status with respect to emission
limits and/or compliance schedules
In compliance
95
In violation
0
Unknown
1
INVESTIGATIONS OF COMPLIANCE STATUS 97/1/75 to 6/30/76)
Y. Formal written inquiries
2. Field investigations.
TOTAL
CASE DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS (7/1/75 to 6/30/76)
T. Notices/citations of violation issued
2. Administrative orders issued-.
3. Civil/criminal proceedings initiated
2
35,4
356
15
9
0
TOTAL
-24
"Formal Reporting System - State Activity Report,"
EPA Office of Planning and Management,
Program Reporting Division, June 30, 1976.
Number represent state and local enforcement activity^
206
-------
TABLE A
NEVADA
Attainment Status of National Ambient Air Quality Standards

by Air Quality Control Region
"" "— • — -^_ Pollutant
AQCR ~~^--^_
013. Clark-Mohave Interstate
(Nevada portion)
147. Nevada
148. Northwest Nevada
TSP

X
X
X
so2

AR
Ox

N02

"X" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS, but no call for
a SIP revision.

"AR" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS and a call for
a SIP revision for attainment and maintenance.

"MR" indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS, however, a SIP
revision for maintenance is necessary.

A blank indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS and no calls far
SIP revisions.

"Y" Indicates an adequate SIP, smelter closed.
207
-------
NEVADA

able B. STATUS OF SELECTED PORTIONS OF THE

STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SIP Portion
New Source Review
Status
EPA promulgation (4/73) for Washoe
County.
Transportation Measures.
Measures in effect for Clark County.
Emission Limitations
EPA promulgation for S02(2/75),
disapproved for TSP (no promulgation
to date), approved for other pollutants.
Section 51,18 only because PSD is disapproved nationwide. See
section on new source review in SIP Overview for more details.
Table C. COMPARISON OF FY 1977 PROJECTED NEEDS AND

ACTUAL FY 1976 RESOURCES
Resources
Resource needs projected for FY 1977
Actual resources available in FY 1976
Man-years
39
29
Dollars (xlO3)
$618
528
208
-------
NEVADA
Table D. SUMMARY OF STATE ENFORCEMENT.ACTIVITY (June 30, 1976)'
MAJOR INSTALLATIONS
(Facilities capable
of emitting over
100 tons of a pol-
lutant each year)
. 79
Status with respect to emission
limits and/or compliance schedules
In compliance
65
In violation
7
Unknown
7
INVESTIGATIONS OF COMPLIANCE STATUS 97/1/75 to 6/30/76)
Y. Formal written inquiries .CT.... 222
2. Field investigations , 1,366
TOTAL .
CASE DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS (7/1/75 to 6/30/76)
T7Notices/citations of violation issued...
2. Administrative orders issued
3. Civil/criminal proceedings initiated
TOTAL
1,588
87
26
31

144
a"Formal Reporting System - State Activity Report,"
EPA Office of Planning and Management, .
Program Reporting Division, June 30, 1976.
Number represent state and local enforcement activity.
209
-------
EPA REGION X
ALASKA
IDAHO
OREGON
WASHINGTON
211
-------
TABLE A

ALASKA
Attainment Status of National Ambient Air Quality Standards

by Air Quality Control Region
~~~~ -*^_ Pollutant
AQCR ^^^^^—~_
008. Cook Inlet
009. Northern Alaska
010. South Central Alaska
Oil. Southeastern Alaska
TSP
X
X2

X
so2

CO
X
X

N02

"X" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS, but no call for
a SIP revision.

"AR" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS and a call for
a SIP revision for attainment and maintenance.

"MR" indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS, however, a SIP
revision for maintenance is necessary.

A blank indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS and no calls for
SIP revisions.
2
Secondary standard only.
212
-------
ALASKA

fable B. STATUS OF SELECTED PORTIONS OF THE

STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SIP Portion
Status
New Source Review
Approved
Transportation Measures
EPA promulgation for Northern Alaska
AQCR.
Emission Limitations
Revisions needed for CO, approved for
other pollutants.
aSection 51.18 only because PSD is disapproved nationwide. See
section on new. source review in SIP Overview for more details.
Table C. COMPARISON OF FY 1977 PROJECTED NEEDS AMD

ACTUAL FY 1976 RESOURCES
Resources
Resource needs projected for FY 1977
Actual resources available in FY 1976
Man-years
15
16
Dollars (xlO3)
$622
489
213
-------
ALASKA
Table D. SUMMARY OF STATE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY (June 30, 1976)'
MAJOR INSTALLATIONS
(Facilities capable
of emitting over
100 tons of a pol-
lutant each year)
78
Status with respect to emission
limits and/or compliance schedules
In compliance
77
In violation
1
Unknown
• 0
INVESTIGATIONS OF COMPLIANCE STATUS 97/1/75 to 6/30/76)
T. Formal written inquiries
2. Field investigations •
TOTAL
CASE DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS (7/1/75 to 6/30/76)
T. Notices/citations of violation issued —
2. Administrative orders issued ,
3. Civil/criminal proceedings initiated
22
165
187
40
2
16
TOTAL
58
"Formal Reporting System - State Activity Report,"
EPA Office of Planning and Management,
Program Reporting Division, June 30, 1976.
Number represent state and local enforcement activity.
214
-------
TABLE A
IDAHO
Attainment Status of National Ambient Air QuaH.ty Standards

by Air Quality Control Region
' — -— -u^_ Pollutant
AQCR ^^^~-— _
061 . Eastern Idaho
062. Eastern Washington-Northern
Idaho Interstate (Idaho
portion)
063. Idaho
064. Metropolitan Boise
TSP
AR

AR
X
X
so2
AR

X2
Ox

N02

"X" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS, but no call for
a SIP revision.

"AR" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS and a call for
a SIP revision for attainment and maintenance.

"MR" indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS, however, a SIP
revision for maintenance is necessary.

A blank indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS and no calls for
SIP revisions.
o
Preliminary analysis; data base inadequate to serve as basis of control
strategy development.

215
-------
IDAHO

Table B. STATUS OF SELECTED PORTIONS OF THE

STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SIP Portion
Status
New Source Review
Approved
Transportation Measures
None required
Emission Limitations
Disapproval of S02 regulations for
acid plant at J. R. Simplot & Co. on
6/9/76.
aSection 51.18 only because PSD is disapproved nationwide. See
section on new source review in SIP Overview for more details.
Table C. COMPARISON OF FY 1977 PROJECTED NEEDS AND

ACTUAL FY 1976 RESOURCES
Resources
Resource needs projected for FY 1977
Actual resources available in FY 1976
Man-years
31
19
Dollars (xlO3)
$615
447
216
-------
IDAHO .

Table D. SUMMARY OF STATE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY (June 30, 1976);
MAJOR INSTALLATIONS
(Facilities capable
of emitting over
100 tons of a pol-
lutant each year)
101
Status with respect to emission
limits and/or compliance schedules
In compliance
99 •
In violation
2
Unknown
0
INVESTIGATIONS OF COMPLIANCE STATUS 97/1/75 to 6/30/76)
Y. Formal written inquiries
2. Field investigations
TOTAL
CASE DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS (7/1/75 to 6/30/76)
T. Notices/citations of violation issued —
2. Administrative orders issued..... ,
3. Civil/criminal proceedings initiated....
5
290
295
11
0
4
TOTAL
15
"Formal Reporting System - State Activity Report,"
EPA Office of Planning and Management,
Program Reporting Division, June 30, 1976.
Number represent 'State and local enforcement activity.
217
-------
TABLE A
OREGON
Attainment Status of National Ambient Air Quality Standards

by Air Quality Control Region
' -- — ^^_ Pollutant
AQCR ~~^^^^— _
190. Central Oregon
191 . Eastern Oregon
192. Northwest Oregon
193. Portland Interstate (Oregon
portion)
194. Southwest Oregon
TSP
X2
X2

AR
AR2
so2

N02

"X" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS, but no call for
a SIP revision.

"AR" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS and a call for
a SIP revision for attainment and maintenance.

"MR" indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS, however, a SIP
revision for maintenance is necessary.

A blank indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS and no calls for
SIP revisions.
2
Secondary standard only.
218
-------
OREGON

Table B. STATUS OF SELECTED PORTIONS OF THE

STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SIP Portion
Status
New Source Review
Approval if Indirect Source Plan on
2/4/76.
.Transportation Measures
Approved
Emission Limitations .
Approved
Section 51.18 only because PSD is disapproved nationwide. See
section on new source review in SIP Overview for more details.
Table C. COMPARISON OF FY 1977 PROJECTED NEEDS AND

ACTUAL FY 1976 RESOURCES
Resources
Resource needs projected for FY 1977
Actual resources available in FY 1976
Man-years
229
130
Dollars (xlO3)
$3,834
2,126
219
-------
OREGON
Table D. SUMMARY OF STATE'ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY (June 30, 1976)(
MAJOR INSTALLATIONS
(Facilities capable
of emitting over
100 tons of a pol-
lutant each year)
360
Status with respect
limits and/or compl
In compliance
346
to emission
iance schedules
In violation
.14
Unknown
0
INVESTIGATIONS OF COMPLIANCE STATUS 97/1/75 to 6/30/76)
Y. Formal written inquiries
2.. Field investigations
TOTAL
CASE DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS (7/1/75 to 6/30/76)
T. Notices/citations of violation issued —
2. Administrative orders issued
3. Civil/criminal proceedings initiated
0
479
479
12
3
9
TOTAL
24
"Formal Reporting System - State Activity Report,"
EPA Office of Planning and Management,
Program Reporting Division, June 30, 1976.
Number represent state and local enforcement activity.
220
-------
TABLE A

WASHINGTON
Attainment Status of National Ambient Air Quality Standards

by Air Quality Control Region
— -<-. Pollutant
AQCR ^^^-^-_
062. Eastern Washington-Northern
Idaho Interstate (Washington
portion)
193. Portland Interstate
(Washington portion)
227. Northern Washington
•
228. Olympia-Northwest Washington
229. Puget Sound
230. South Central Washington
TSP

X
•
X4
X
X2
X2
X
so2

N02

"X" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS, but no call for
a SIP revision.

"AR" indicates non-attainment of an applicable NAAQS and a call for
a SIP revision for attainment and maintenance.

"MR" indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS, however, a SIP
revision for maintenance is necessary.

A blank indicates attainment of an applicable NAAQS and no calls for
SIP revisions.
2
Secondary standard only.
q
Preliminary analysis; data base inadequate to serve as a basis of
control strategy development.

Primary standard violation from non-SIP monitor—source oriented.
221
-------
WASHINGTON

Table B. STATUS OF SELECTED PORTIONS OF THE

STATE IMPLEMENTATION. PLAN
SIP Portion
Status
New Source Review
Approved
Transportation Measures
Promulgations for Seattle and Spokane
AQCRs.
Emission Limitations
Approved
Section 51.18 only because PSD is disapproved nationwide. See
section on new source review in SIP Overview for more details.
Table C. COMPARISON OF FY 1977 PROJECTED NEEDS AND

ACTUAL FY 1976 RESOURCES
Resources
Resource needs projected for FY 1977
Actual resources available in FY 1976
Man-years
280
121
Dollars (xlO3)
$5,592
3,023
222
-------
WASHINGTON
Table D. SUMMARY OF STATE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY (June 30, 1976)'
MAJOR INSTALLATIONS
(Facilities capable
of emitting over
TOO tons of a pol-
lutant each year)
261
Status with respect to emission
limits and/or compliance schedules
In compliance
254
In violation
7
Unknown
0
INVESTIGATIONS OF COMPLIANCE STATUS 97/1/75 to 6/30/76)
1. Formal written inquiries..
2. Field investigations...... ....
TOTAL
CASE DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS (7/1/75 to 6/30/76)
T. Notices/citations of violation issued
2. Administrative orders issued
3. Civil/criminal proceedings initiated :
TOTAL
0
290
290
1,285
5
680
1,970
a"Formal Reporting System - State Activity Report,"
EPA Office of Planning and Management,
Program Reporting Division, June 30, 1976.
Number represent state and local enforcement activity.
223
-------
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
(Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
1. REPORT NO.
EPA-450/2-76-026
3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSIOI*NO.
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
State Air Pollution Implementation Plan Progress
Report, January 1 to June 30, 1976
5. REPORT DATE
October 1976
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHOR(S)
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO
9. PERFORMING ORG'XNIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air ani
Waste Management, Office of Air Quality Planning and
Standards, Research Triangle Park, N.C., and Office of
Enforcement. Washington, D.C.
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air and Waste Management
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Research Triangle Park. N.C. 27711
13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
Progress, 1/1 to 6/30/76
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
16. ABSTRACT
This report presents data for each state on the attainment/non-attainment status and
calls for revision to the State Implementation Plan (SIPs) by Air Quality Control
Region (AQCR) and state portion of interstate AQCRs for all criteria pollutants,
status of selected portions of the State Implementation Plans, resources (manpower
and funding), and compliance status of selected source categories. One hundred
twenty-four AQCRs or state portions have attained the TSP standard, 256 the SO?
standard, 233 the CO standard, 143 the oxidant standard and 308 the NO, standard
The other AQCRs or state portions require either SIP revisions for attainment and
maintenance, SIP revisions for maintenance only, or require no revision but are
classified as non-attainment areas. Since the last report in this series (EPA-450/2-
76-006, April 1976), the number of major emitters identified has increased to 21,930;
90 percent of these are now in compliance with either an emission standard or an
acceptable compliance schedule.
7.
KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
DESCRIPTORS
b.lDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS C. COSATI Field/Group
Air Pollution
Air Quality Monitoring
Air Quality Standards
State Implementation Plans
Enforcement
8. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
Release unlimited
19. SECURITY CLASS (ThisReport)'
Unclassified
21. NO. OF PAGES
224
20. SECURITY CLASS (Thispage)
Unclassified
22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73)
224
•U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE:1976-740-110/302 Region 4
-------