Fate of Priority Pollutants in Publicly
Owned Treatment Work: Documentation for
TOXET Data Set
Burns and Roe Industrial Services Corp,
Pararaus, NJ
Prepared for
Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, DC
Oct 79
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Technical Information Service
-------
REPORT DOCUMENTATION
PAGE
i. REPORT NO.
EPA 440/1-79-301
PBS1-228C24
4. TW« and SuWttU
Fate of Priority Pollutants In Publicly owned
Treatment Work - Documentation for TOXET Data Set
1979
7. Author*))
Howard Feller
Orf»miatlon R«ot- No.
9. P«rfafmln« Onjmiutton Nwn* and Addr
10. Pnt«a/Ta«k/Wani Unit Mo.
Burns and Roe. Industrial Services Corporation
283 Route 17 South
Paramus, New Jersey 07650
11. ComncttC} or OnnttO) No.
(O
(CD
12. Sooowrma; Organisation Nun* and Addntas
13. Type of R«oort & Pvnod Cav»r»d
US EPA
401 M Street, SW
Washington, O.C.
20460
13. 3u0pt«m«nnrs Not**
IS. Abstract (Umrt 200 wroa)
The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has Initiated a program to study the
occurrence and fate of 129 selected toxic organic and Inorganic pollutants (priority
/pollutants) by means of a sampling program, at 40 publicly owned treatment works
(POTW's). The first phase of this work was a pilot study at two POTX's to select the
parameters of interest and establish detailed technical procedures that will be used
for the overall project. In this report, data obtained from the two POTU's selected
for the pilot study are presented. Since these two plants have different proportions
of Industrial contributions and priority pollutant levels in POTW influents is
examined. Additionally, other specific phinomena were studied, including the overall
removal of toxic pollutants, removal of toxic pollutants, removal mechanisms,
concentration of toxic pollutants 1n sludge and the formation of chlorinated
hydrocarbons during chlorine hydrocarbon during chlorine disinfection. EPA protocol
for collection, sampling and analysis of priority pollutants was followed for each
procedure performed in the study, except where noted. Detailed of specific goals of
the pilot study are outlined below.
17. Doeumont AndyiM a. OncrlDtor*
Publicly owned treatment works, TOXIC pollutants, inorganic, organic, data systems.
a. ldantl1t«n/OpwvCna*d Torn*
PHOOUCT OF:
NATIONAL TECHNICAL
INFORMATION SERVICE
U.S. OEPHHTHEIH OF COMUEIICE
SMIMflElO. (». 21S1
COSAT1 FMd/Grauo
It iv.il.oiMty
Release Unlimited
21. No. of ?*«•*
20.
_
AgCOCV 22- "re.
oflinn Q
S*« ANS.-i39.Iff)
FO*M Z77 (4-771
AUG 10 198 r™ •"""—
LIBRARY
-------
ATTENTION
AS NOTED IN THE NTIS ANNOUNCEffiNT,
PORTIONS OF THIS REPORT ARE NOT LZGISLZ
HOWEVER, IT IS THE BEST REPRODUCTION
AVAILABLE FROM THE COPY SENT TO NTIS.
1<
-------
SECTION I
-------
INDEX
DATA SET: Publicly owned Treatment Works - Burns and Rowe
TABLE OF CONTENTS
DESIGN
Fate of Priority Pollutants
in Publicly Owned Treatment
Works: Pilot Study
I. Sutmiary and Conclusions
Summary
Conclusions
II. Introduction
Establishment of Sampling Techniques
Establishment of Appropriate Sampling
Points
Development of Analytical Protocol for
Samples
Fate of Priority Pollutants in POTW's
SECTION I
Page
1
1
1
3
3
3
-------
III. Plant Selection 5
Plant A 5
Plant B 5
IV. Sample Point Description 7
Plant A 8
Plant B. -. 10
V. Sampling u
Sampling Frequency 13
Sampling Techniques 13
Sampling Collection Procedures 13
Protocol and Protocol Modificatios 13
Data Sunmary 16
Major Trends 16
VH. Analysis of Results 19
Fate of Priority 19
Result of Sampling Frequency and Sampling
Point Selection Experiments 30
Potential of Additional Sample Points 33
-------
LIST OS" TABLES Nuntoer Title Page
IV-1 Sampling Frequency at Plant A 7
TV-2 Sampling Frequency at Plant 3 3
VI-1 Sunnary. Percent Occurrences of Organics
Pollutants - Plant A 17
VI-2 Sumnary Percent Occurrences of Organics
Pollutants - Plant B 18
VII-1 Percent Occurrences of Priority Pollutants
Plant A 20
VTI-2 Percent Occurrences of Priority Pollutants
Plant B 22
VII-3 Plant A. Data Surrmary Week 1 Average 23
VH-4 Plant B. Data Sunmary 24
VII-5 Plant A. Mass Balance Weekly Summary 26
VH-6 Plant B. Mass Balance Weekly Sunmary 28
VII-7 Plant A. Effect of Chlorine on Priority
Pollutant Concentrations 30
VII-8 Plant B, Effect of Chlorine on Priority
Pollutant Concentrations 31
VII-9 3-aour Composites vs. Metals
Concentrations 32
-------
LIST OF FIOJRES Number Title Page
f7-l Influent Sampling Point at
Plant A 9
17-2 Prechlorinated Effluent
Sampling Point Plant B 11
17-3 Final Effluent Sampling Point
Plant B 12
V-l Automatic Sampler 14
-------
- QOALUY ASSURANCE FOR LABORATORY
ANALYSIS OF PRIORIT? POLLUTANTS
i Preface
ii List, of Tables
ill List: of Figures
iiii Acknowledgements
i
II GE^EPAL GtlALITY' CUNI'KJL CCNSEEPATICNS AMD ANALTTIC^L
MEIECECaJCGIZS
EL! PRIOKTIY POUUTSOT LABOHATOKf QCRLnY CCNTSDL
IV PERFOIWANC COWJ1HJL LECTS FOR PRIORITY POLLCTANTS
-------
13.
TABL£ OF CONTENTS
Page
PREFACE , • ™
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Chapter
I IMPORTANCE OF QUALITY CONTROL
l-l
1.1 General • }•[
1.2 Quality Assurance Programs ' • f'^
1.3 Analytical Methods }*-
1.4 Reference • • • • l**
2 LABORATORY SERVICES -•!
2.1 General M
2.2 Distilled Water M
2.3 Compressed Air --5
• 2.4 Vacuum 2-5
2.5. Kood System 2-5
2.6 Electrical Services 2-6
2.7 References . • . . 1-6
3 INSTRUMENT SELECTION 3-1
3.1. Introduction 3-1
3.1 Analytical Balances 3-1
3.3 pH/Setecrive-Icn Meters 3-3
3.4 Conductivity M*ters 3-6
3.5 Turbidimeters (Nepheiometers; ... . . . 3-~
3.6 Spectrometers 3-3
3.7 Organic Carbon Analyzers .... 3-13
3.3. GiS Chromatograpos 3-14
.3.9 . 'References 3-1 a
4 GLASSWARE . i-|
4.1 General' . . ^.\
4.2' Types of Glass-ware .... 4-2
4.3 Volumetric Analyses 4-3
4.4 Federal Specifications for Volumetric Glassware • 4-J.
4.5 Cleaning of Glass and Porcelain ... . . j_5
4,6 Special Geaning Rsqutrements 4-0
~.~ Disposable Glassware . . 0.7
4.8 Speciaiizid Glassware 4-r
4.9 Fritted Wire . . ^
4.10 References . . .1.9
•^ REAGENTS. SOLVENTS. AND GASES . ' 5-1
5.1 Introduction . 5,1
5.2 Reagent Quality . : • . . _-,;
-------
14.
5-3 Elimination of Determinate Errors
5.4 References
QUALITY CONTROL FOR ANALYTICAL PERFORMANCE
6.1 Introduction
6.2 The Industrial Approach to QC
6 J Applying Control Qiarts in Environmental Laboratories
6.4 Recommended Laboratory Quality Assurance Program
6.5 Outline of a Comprehensive Quality Assurancs Program
6.6 Related Topics
6.7 References - • -
DATA HANDLING AND REPORTING
7.1 Introduction
7.2 The .Analytical Value
7.3 Glossary of Statistical Terms . .
7.4 Report Forms
7.5 References
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR TRACE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Sampling and Sample Handling
SJ Extract Handling
8.4 Supplies and Reagents •. . .
3.5 Quality .Assurance
3.6 Reference
SKILLS AND TRAINING
9.1 General
9.2 Skills
9.3 Training
10 " WATER AND WASTEWATER SAMPLING
10.1 Introduction
10.2 .Areas of Sampling
10.3 References
RADIOCHEMISTRY
11.1 Introduction
11.2 Sample Collection ... . .
11.3 Laboratory Practices
11.4 Quality Control
1 1.5 References
MICROBIOLOGY
12.1 Background ...
12.2 Specific N'esds in Microbiology
12.3 Intralaboratory Quality Control . .
12.4 Intsriaboratory Quality Control • .-
1 2.5 Development of a Formal Quality Assurance Program
1 2.5 Documentation of" 2 Quaiicy Assurance Program
M
-------
IS.
12.7 Oiain-ofXTustody Procedures for Microbiological Samples .... 12-3
12.8 Reference* 12-10
13 AQUATIC BIOLOGY 13-1
13.1 Summary of General Guidelines 13-1
13.2 Discussion 13-2
13J Reference 13-*
14 LABORATORYSAFcTY , 14.1
14.1 Law and Authority for Safety and Health 14-1
14.2 EPA Policy on Laboratory Safery 14-5
14.3 Laboratory Safety Practices 14-7
14.4 Report of Unsafe or Unheaithful Condition :. 14-15
14.5 References 14-15
Appendix A-Suggested Cheddist for the Safety Evaluation of E?A Laboratory Arcas A-t
-------
ASSURANCE PLANS Section II
I. Sludge Analytical Protocol
Page
1.1 Scope and Application 1
1.2 Summary 1
1.3 Apparatus and Reagents 2
1.4 Sanpling and Preservation 4
1.5 Preparation of Purgeable Organic
Free Water 5
1.6 Preparation of Standards 6
1.7 Saitple Preparation and Purging 10
1.3 Analysis of the Sample Purge 12
1.9 Purgeable Organics Analytical Quality Assurance 12
1.10 Data Handling 15
II. Method for Semi-volatile Organics 26
2.1 Scope and Application 26
2. 2 Surmary 26
2.3 Apparatus 27
2.4 Reagents 28
2.5 Preparation of Standards 30
2.6 Sanpling and Preservation 30
2.7 Sanple Extraction 31
2.3 Extract dean-up 33
2.9 Saitple Extract Analysis 35
2.10 Extractable Organics Analytical Quality Assurance 37
2.11 Data Handling 41
-------
Appendix 51
in. Quality Assurance for Laboratory Analysis of 129 Priority Pollutants
17. Priority Pollutant Methodology Quality Assurance Seview
Page
1. Abstract
2. Introduction 2
3. Analytical Methodolcgy 3
4. Quality Assurance Requirements 5
5. Interlaboratory Comparison 9
6. Purgeable Organic Compounds 10
7, Phenolic Acids 12
8. Base/Neutrals Ccmpunds 14
9. Pesticides 17
10. Metals 17
11. Cyanide and Total Phenols 17
12. Summary and Conclusion 18
V. Evaluation, of Begion VH Data Set
-------
Water EPA-440/1-79-300
Fate of Priority
Pollutants in
Publicly Owned
Treatment Works
Pilot Study
by
Howard Feiler
Burns and Roe Industrial Services Corporation
283 Route 1 7 South
Paramus, New Jersey 07652
Project Officer
R. Dean Jarman
Effluent Guidelines Division
Water Planning and Standards
Office of Water and Waste Management
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Washington DC 20460
-------
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Acknowledgement is made to Burns and Roe Industrial Services
Corporation, Paramus, New Jersey, the EPA contractor for the project.
The following members of the technical staff made significant
contributions to the overall project effort and execution of the sampling
program: Howard D. Feiler, Paul Storch, Henry Celestino, Gary Martin,
and Mark Sadowski.
The Environmental Protection Agency personnel contributing to this
effort were Project Officer, Dean Jarman, Office of Research and
Development, Center for Environmental Research Information;
Assistant Project Officer, Arthur Shattuck, Effluent Guidelines Division;
Jeffrey Denrt, Effluent Guidelines Division, and Thomas O'Farrell, Office
of the Deputy Assistant Administrator for Water Planning and
Standards.
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS |. Summary and Conclusions 1
Summary 1
Conclusions , 1
II. Introduction 3
Establishment of Sampling Techniques 3
Establishment of Appropriate Sampling Points 3
Development of Analytical Protocol for Samples 4
Fate of Priority Pollutants in POTW's 4
III. Plant Selection 5
Plant A 5
Plant B 5
IV. Sample Point Description 7
Plant A 8
Plant 3 10
V. Sampling 13
Sampling Frequency 13
Sampling Techniques 13
Sampling Collection Procedures 13
Protocol and Protocol Modifications 13
VI. Data Summary 16
Major Trends 16
VII. Analysis of Results 19
Fate of Priority Pollutants 19
Results of Sampling Frequency and Sampling Point
Selection Experiments 30
Potential of Additional Sample Points 33
-------
LIST OF TABLES Number ™e
IV-1 Sampling Frequency at Plant A 7
IV-2 Sampling Frequency at Plant B 8
VM Summary. Percent Occurrences of Organic
Pollutants—Plant A 17
VI-2 Summary Percent Occurrences of Organic
Pollutants—Plant B IB
Vll-1 Percent Occurrences of Priority Pollutants—Plant A 20
Vll-2 Percent Occurrences of Priority Pollutants—Plant B 22
VII-3 Plant A, Data Summary Week 1 Average 23
VII-4 Plant B. Data Summary 24
VII-5 Plant A. Mass Balance Weekly Summary 26
VII-6 Plant B. Mass Balance Weekly Summary 28
VII-7 Plant A. Effect of Chlorine on Priority Pollutant
Concentrations 30
Vtl-8 Plant B. Effect of Chlorine on Priority Pollutant
Concentrations 31
VII-9 8-Hour Composites vs. Metals Concentrations 32
IV
-------
LIST OF FIGURES Number Title
IV-1 Influent Sampling Point at Plant A 9
IV-2 Prechlormated Effluent Sampling Point Plant B 11
IV-3 Final Effluent Sampling Point Plant 8 12
V-1 Automatic Sampler 14
1>*N
/'
-------
I. SUMMARY AND
CONCLUSIONS
Summary
The purpose of this report is to
present the results of a two-plant
pilot study designed to determine
future operating parameters to be
used during a study of the fate of
priority pollutants in publicly
owned treatment works
(POTW's). The scope of the overall
project is anticipated to
encompass 7-day, 24-hour
sampling at 40strategically
located POTW's, representing a
variety of municipal treatment
technologies, size ranges, and
percentages of industrial flow. A
major goal of the project is to
characterize the impact of toxic
pollutants, from all sources, on
POTW operations. In addition the
effect of secondary treatment on
priority pollutants will be studied.
The pilot study was conducted at
two POTW's with significantly
different characteristics. These
two plants provided contrasts in
many areas, including size,
percent industrial flow, age,
operation, sludge conditioning
methodology, and capacity
utilized. .. '
During the two-plant program the
analytical and logistical factors of
field sampling were tested to
determine the optimum field
methodologies and also to ascer-
tain the feasibility of studying
other aspects of POTW
operations. Additionally, prelimin-
ary information regarding the
incidence, impact and fate of
priority pollutants in POTW's was
developed. The data obtained
from this study will impact the
pretreatment regulations for
indirect dischargers as to credits
allowed (if any) for acceptable
treatability or removal of toxics in
POTW's.
Conclusions
1. A significantly higher
incidence of organic priority
pollutants was observed at
the more industrial Plant A as
compared to the essentially
non-industrial Plant 8.
2. Seven of nine metallic priority
pollutants were found to have
higher average concentra-
tions in the Plant A influent.
3. Of nine organic priority
pollutants measured in Plant
A's influent at an average
concentration greater than 10
fjg/l, eight were reduced by a
minimum of 50 percent.
Organic priority pollutants at
Plant 8 occurred at such low
levels that percent removal
data could not be determined.
4. Metallic priority pollutants
were removed over a broad
range of efficiencies at both
plants.
5. The following priority
pollutants were concentrated
in the residues generated at
Plant A: cadmium, copper,
lead, nickel, zinc,
acenaphthene, dichlorobro-
momethane, 1,2-benzanthra-
cene, 3,4-benzofluoranthene,
fluorene and pyrene.
Similarly, at Plant 8,
chromium, copper, lead,
nickel, zinc, acrylonitnle,
dichlorobromomethane and
3,4 benzofluoranthene were
concentrated in the sludge.
6. Refractory, but volatile
organic priority pollutants
such as benzene, 1,1,1-
trichloroethane, ethylben-
zene, toluene and
trichloroethylene were well
removed but not concentrated
in plant sludges, suggesting
air stripping as a possible
removal mechanism.
-------
7. Daily variation of influent
metallic priority pollutant
concentrations was observed
at both POTW's, but the vari-
ation was most pronounced
at Plant A. Metals concentra-
tions increased during the
latter parts of the work week
and dipped during weekends.
Similar effects were recordec
for conventional pollutants,
but, in general, for organic
priority pollutants, levels
were too low to permit
observation of trends.
8. The 8-hour versus 24-hour
composite experiment that
was carried out on the Plant A
influent showed that there
was no appreciable difference
between daily concentration
values of organic priority pollu-
tants. However, at the more
industrial Plant A, metals
concentrations were found to
be significantly higher during
the 0800 to 1600 (8:00 a.m. to
4:00 p.m.) period.
9. Sampling and analysis of
prechlonnated effluent
samples produced evidence
that formation of toxic
chlorinated hydrocarbons in
chlorine contact chambers
and receiving streams does
occur.
10. The mass loading of priority
pollutants in the floatables
and sludge filtrate was
found to be very small, as
compared to the mass
loading in total POTW
residues.
-------
II. INTRODUCTION
The United States Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) has
initiated a program to study the
occurrence and fate of 129
selected toxic organic and
inorganic pollutants (priority)
pollutants) by means of a
sampling program, at 40 publicly
owned treatment works
(POTW's). The first phase of this
work was a pilot study at two
POTW's to select the parameters
of interest and establish detailed
technical procedures that will be
used for the overall project. In this
report, data obtained from the two
POTW'S selected for the pilot
study are presented. Since these
two plants have different
proportions of industrial flow,
the relationship between indus-
trial contributions and priority
pollutant levels in POTW influents
is examined. Additionally, other
specific phenomena were
studied, including the overall
removal of toxic pollutants,
removal mechanisms, concentra-
tion of toxic pollutants in sludge
and the formation of chlorinated
hydrocarbons during chlorine
disinfection. EPA protocol' for
collection, sampling and analysis
of priority pollutants was followed
for each procedure performed in
the study, except where noted.
Details of specific goals of the
pilot study are outlined below.
Establishment of Sampling
Techniques
An effort was made during
sampling at the pilot facilities to
determine the procedure best
suited for obtaining the most
representative samples from each
treatment plant over the course of
the entire 40-plant program. The
effort focused on determining an
appropriate sample frequency for
obtaining the most representative
picture of wastewater
fluctuations which occur at a
typical sewage treatment facility,
as well as determining which
days would yield the most
representative samples, should
the final sampling plan be limited
to less than seven days of
sampling per week.
Establishment of Appropriate
Sampling Points
Determination of the appropriate
sampling points to be used in the
remainder of the 40-plant
program was another focus of the
pilot study. Samples were taken
at different intermediate points in
the wastewater treatment
processes to ascertain which
sampling points would provide
the best information on the fate of
priority pollutants as they pass
through the POTW.
'Guidelines Estaolisning Test Procedure* for the
Analysis of Pollutants. To be puolisned cn trie
Ftdarat Regular. Proposed Amendments to
40CFRPan136.
-------
Development of Analytical
Protocol for Samples
Another goal of the pilot study
was to provide samples to be used
in analytical protocol
development. The present EPA
protocol for the analysis of
industrial waste water samples is
not specifically suitable for
evaluation of municipal
wastewater or sludge samples.
For example, analytical
techniques for municipal sludges,
which are characterized by high
solids content, require different
techniques from those required
for the cleaner effluent streams or
industrial wastewaters for which
the protocols were originally
developed. To assure that
repeatable and accurate results
are obtained throughout the
duration of the 40-plant study, the
samples collected during the pilot
work were provided to analytical
laboratories for the experimental
development of new protocol
procedures. Replicate analyses
were completed using different
methods in order to develop
appropriate procedures to be used
for the full study.
Fate of Priority Pollutants in
POTW's
A further goal of the pilot program
was to develop preliminary
conclusions on the fate of the
priority pollutants in POTW's.
These conclusions will be
substantiated as the sampling
progresses through the 40-plant
schedule and a detailed technical
report will be forthcoming after
completion of the project.
-------
III. PLANT SELECTION
For the pilot study, two
conventional activated sludge
facilities were chosen for
evaluation. Plant A is a 120
Mgal/d design capacity plant with
approximately 70 percent of its
organic loading and 30 percent of
its flow contributed by industry,
while Plant B is a 15 Mgal/d
design capacity plant with approx-
imately 2 percent industrial flow.
The following is a characteriza-
tion of the two POTW's sampled
during the pilot study.
Plant A
The design capacity of Plant A is
300 Mgal/d primary flow and 120
Mgal/d secondary flow. Under
normal dry weather conditions,
the flow through this system
varies between 85 percent to 90
percent of its secondary capacity.
During the first week of sampling
at the plant, the flow averaged
only 91.0 Mgal/d.
The original primary treatment
facility was constructed in 1924,
and most of the sewers are as old
or older than the primary system.
It is estimated that the collection
system is 60 percent separate
sewers and 40 percent combined
sewers.
The treatment unit operations at
this conventional activated sludge
POTW begin with gravity flow
from the drainage area to the bar
screens and grit chambers, from
which lift pumps elevate the
wastewater for gravity flow
through the rest of the plant. After
the lift pumps, the wastewater
passes through pre'-aeration,
primary settling, clarification, and
into the aeration chambers. After
aeration, clarification, and
chiorination, the wastewater is
discharged to a local stream.
Sludge handling at this POTW
involves primary sludge
thickening by gravity thickeners,
secondary sludge thickening by
dissolved air flotation (DAF).
vacuum filtration and
incineration. During the sampling
period at Plant A, the primary
sludge flow averaged 323,000
gal/d and the secondary (waste
activated) sludge flow averaged
1.5 Mgal/d.
Industrial contributions to the
flow are primarily from several
major industries: pharmaceutical
manufacture, petrochemicals,
plating operations, and
automotive foundries. Also
contributing to Plant A's sewage
collection system are some coking
operations and some food
processing plants.
Plant B
The design capacity of Plant 8 is
15 Mgal/d, but under normal
operations between 3 and 10
Mgal/d receive secondary
treatment. During the sampling
period of this pilot study the .
influent flow to the facility
averaged 8.09 Mgal/d
(56,635,000 gallons during the
period August 6 to 13. 1978). This
18-year-old treatment facility
(updated and expanded most
recently in 1973) is designed for a
discharge with an effluent quality
of not more than 10 mg/l
biochemical oxygen demand and
1 2 mg/l of suspended solids. The
average biochemical oxygen
demand and total suspended
solids discharges during the week
of sampling were 25 mg/l and 1 9
mg/l, respectively.
-------
The treatment unit operations
utilized at this conventional
activated sludge facility are as
follows: Wastewater flows from
the sewer system to a diversion
chamber from which it is pumped
to a height which allows gravity
flow to the rest of the plant. The
wastewater then passes through
parallel detritus tanks (grit
chambers), comminutors. pre-
aeration chambers and into the
primary settling tank. After
primary settling, wastewater
flows to the aeration tanks,
secondary settling, chlorination,
and is discharged.
The pcimary sludge flow at this
POTW is pumped to sludge
holding tanks where it is
combined with the thickened (via
OAF) waste activated sludge.
From this point, the combined
sludge passes to the sludge
conditioning facilities where it is
heated and pressurized prior to
vacuum filtration. The decant
from the sludge conditioning
system and the filtrate is either
returned to the sludge
conditioning building, or bled to
the head of the aeration tanks.
The filter cake is incinerated with
the resulting ash being slurned to
a diked lagoon on the plant
property.
During the sampling period, the
primary sludge flow averaged
29,400 gal/d (205.860 gallons
over the 7-day period). Sludge
was usually pumped once per 8-
hour work shift, and samples
were taken during each pumping.
The waste activated sludge was
usually wasted only one time per
week; the one time it was pumped
during the sampling period, a
sample was collected after the
pumping. The estimated flow
during that one pumping was
8,000 gallons. (No accurate flow
reading for this pumping was
available.)
The sewer system for Plant B
consists primarily of combined
sewers, broken down into four
main trunk lines covering the far
sections of the 29.4-square mile
(or 22.5 according to POTW
handout) drainage area. The
sewer lines are mostly concrete
construction and average 20
years in age, with some lines
being over 50 years old. The age
of the sewer lines accounts for
the estimate that as much as 40
to 50 percent of the total flow to
the POTW can be attributed to
infiltration in the subsystems and
interceptors, according to the
facilities plan, completed under
the authority of Section 201 of the
Clean Water Act (PL 95-217).
The industrial contribution to the
wastewater flow to Plant B can be
considered minimal, because the
areawide waste treatment
management plan under Section
208 of the Clean Water Act lists
the zoning breakdown of the
drainage area as 96.6 percent
residential, 1.0 percent retail
business and offices, and 2.4
percent industrial. The industries
associated with this drainage
area are grain elevators, oil and
fuel terminals, machine tool and
metalworking companies, box and
insulation companies, and one
major chemical facility with its
own National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) dis-
charge permit. With such a small
industrial flow. Plant B is con-
sidered to give a general approxi-
mation of a typical residential
treatment facility.
23<
-------
IV. SAM RLE POINT
DESCRIPTION
In an effort to determine the
priority pollutant loads on the
different waste streams within
the two POTW's studied, several
additional sample points were
selected that would not normally
be evaluated. The results of these
analyses will be discussed in a
following section of this report.
At Plant A. nine sampling Points
ware used, as listed m Table IV-1.
Samples were taken on seven
consecutive days at the major
points (influent, sludges,
effluent), and an additional seven
consecutive days at the influent
only. (Extra influent samples were
taken for analyses of 8-hour
versus 24-hour compositing of
influent. See Section VII.)
TABLE IV-1. SAMPUNG FREQUENCY AT PLANT A
Grabs for VOA. O&G Type of
Point
Influent
Effluent
before
Chlorination
Final
Effluent
Primary
Sludge
Secondary
Sludge
Floatadles
(scum)
Combined
Sludge
Tap Water
Vacuum Filter
FHtrate
Collection Method
Automatic Sampler
Automatic Sampler
Automatic Sampler
Manual Composite
Automatic Sampler
Manual Composite
Manual Composite
One Time Grab
One Time Grab
Cn and Phenol
6 times daily
6 times daily1
6 times daily
6 times daily3
6 times daily3
6 times daily3
None (proportion
of primary
secondary)
One Time Grab
One Time Grab
Composite Samples
3, 8-hr composites
24 hr
24 hr
24 hr
24 hr
24 hr
24 hr
N/A
N/A
Duration
7 days
days 5-7*
7 days
7 days
7 days
7 days
7 days
1 day
1 day
'Volatile organic analysis (VOA) grabs only
2Chlorination system was not operative day 1, and had chlorine leaks days 2. 3, 4
•'Composited by laboratory
-------
At Plant B, seven separate waste
streams were sampled, as listed
in Table IV-2. As at Plant A. seven
days of sampling were
undertaken at Plant B to observe
variations over the course of a
complete week.
Each sample point that was
chosen best characterized the
wastewater at a particular stage
of treatment. An effort was made
to choose the sample points in
such a way that any extraneous
factors which might affect the
validity of the sample would be
eliminated. This involved
selecting sampling points that
allowed collection of samples
before settling, volatilization, or
contamination from other waste
streams could occur In instances
where more than one parallel
stream flowed through the same
treatment process, the sample
was taken at the junction of the
parallel streams if it was
accessible In all sampling, the
EPA procedure for obtaining
screening samples was used as
the guide for gathering samples,
and any deviation from the
aforementioned procedure was
documented.
The individual sampling points
used at Plant A and nature of the
wastewater that was sampled
were as follows:
Plant A
Influent
Influent samples were obtained
from one of four parallel flow grit
chambers (usually only two in
operation at one time) after the
bar screens. The influent flow to
Plant A was pumped to a wet
well. Prom there it flowed by
gravity and was split into several
parallel streams prior to passing
through the bar screens and into
the grit chamber. An automatic
sampler was set up at the grit
chamber (Figure IV-1) to draw
equal aliquots over the 8-hour
composite period during the first
week and over the 24-hour
composite period during the
second week. Tubing for the
samples was positioned inside a
fixed conduit which was mounted
to the safety railing around the
grit chambers in such a way that
the conduit could be adjusted
vertically to keep the submerged
end approximately one foot below
the surface of the flow in the grit
chamber. The daily flow
fluctuations and the adjustments
and openings and closings of (he
other grit chambers would affect
the level of the flow in the grit
chamber from which the sample
was being extracted. Thus, to
keep the exposed end of the
TABLE IV-2. SAMPLING FREQUENCY AT PLANT B.
Point
Influent
Effluent
before
Chlonnation
Final
Effluent
Combined
Sludge
Secondary
Sludge
Secondary
Sludge after
DAF thickening
Collection Method
Automatic Sampler
Automatic Sampler
Automatic Sampler
Manual Composite
One Time Grab
One Time Grab
Cn and Phenol
6 times daily
6 times daily
6 times daily
3 times daily'
One Time Grab
One Time Grab
Composite Samples
24 hr
24 hr
24 hr
24 hr
N/A
N/A
Duration
7 days
7 days
7 days
7 days
1 day
1 day
Tap Water
One Time Grab
One Time Grab
N/A
1 day
'Composited by laboratory
8
-------
Figure IV-1.
Influent sampling point
at Plant A.
sample tubing below the top layer
of wastewater flow, the conduit
was checked and adjusted, if
necessary, at least once every
four hours. Samples for the
fractions that were not
automatically composited were
grabbed via a glass dipping
pitcher at the sample midstream
point where the tubing was
positioned. Influent flow readings
were supplied by the treatment
plant after the sampling period
was complete.
Primary Sludge
Samples for the primary sludge
were taken from the main line
between the primary settling
tanks and the sludge conditioning
system. Samples were taken
every four hours for both the
composites and the grabs, with
the composite portion of the
sample being held in a 3-gallon
container and kept on ice at the
sample point. A sludge flow
totalizer was located adjacent to
the sample valve and provided
sludge flow information for each
sample period.
Floatables (Scum)
Thefloatables samples, which
were taken from the primary
settling tanks, represented the
material which had been
skimmed off the tanks and had
accumulated at the discharge end
of the primaries. These samples
were obtained by manually
dipping into this floating layer
each sample period.
Secondary (Waste Activated)
Sludge
The secondary sludge samples
were taken from a lift pump
tower. This tower provided the
only access point to the secondary
sludge before it flowed (by gravity)
to the DAF thickener. An
automatic sampler was set up on
this tower to obtain the composite
samples. Totalizer readings were
read at the secondary control
building and were recorded for
each sample period.
Combined Sludge
The combined sludge sample was
a flow-proportioned composite
sample of the primary and waste
activated sludges. A total of 1600
ml of sludge was composited for
each 4-hour grab sample period.
The ratio of primary sludge to
waste activated sludge was
determined by the flow rate of
each sludge during the preceding
four hours. Each sludge allotment
was measured in a graduated
beaker and transferred to a 3- ,
gallon container for storage in an
ice bath for the 24-hour sample
period.
Pre-chlorinated Effluent
Samples of the pre-chlorinated
effluent were taken immediately
upstream of the chlormation
point. The chlorine is added to the
effluent stream underground, and
a piece of conduit was positioned
at the sample point with the
instream end upstream of the
chlorine contact point.
Chlorination facilities were not
operational during the first few
days of the sampling and,
consequently, no samples of The
pre-chlorinated effluent were
obtained until July 26. Once the
sampling was begun at this point.
-------
a small chlorine gas leak
developed, and it was judged
unsafe to enter the 10-foot access
hole to gather the grab samples.
To remedy this problem, an
additional sampler was set up to
collect the grab fraction samples
(volatile organic analyses—VOA's
only) from the stream and deliver
them to the surface
Final Effluent
The final effluent sample point
was located at the discharge end
of the chlorine contact chamber,
JUST prior to the overflow weir to
the river Composite samples,
where appropriate, were collected
with an automatic sampler,
utilizing a conduit to fix the intake
tube's position.
Vacuum Filter Filtrate
One grab sample was taken of the
vacuum filter filtrate from the
vacuum discharge line in the filter
building. {All sample bottles were
filled as grabs at this one time.)
Each filling yielded approximately
250 ml of sample. No values for
the flow of this waste stream
were available.
Tap Water
A single grab sample for all
parameters was taken of the tap
water in the Plant's laboratory
sink The sample point was
considered representative of the
city water supply.
The individual sampling points at
Plant B and the nature of the
wastewater sampled are as
follows'
Plant B
Influent
The influent sample point was at
the head end of the grit chambers
(detritus tanks). At this point an
automatic sampler was set up
with the sample tubing secured
inside a stationary conduit so as
to maintain the wetted end in a
position in the center of the
turbulent zone. This area was
subject to surges of wastewater
flow, and a secure placement of
the tubing was the only way to
obtain a representative sample of
the influent. The grab fractions for
the influent were obtained via a
glass pitcher which was dipped
directly into the wastewater. Flow
readings of the influent flow rates
were supplied by the treatment
plant after the sampling period
had been completed. Additional
parallel sampling at the sampling
point was done by another EPA
contractor who is also sampling
wastewater collection systems for
priority pollutants.
Combined Sludge
The combined sludge sample was
to be a flow composite of the
primary sludge and the secondary
sludge, but until the last day of
sampling, there was no secondary
sludge being wasted. Thus, the
sludge sample for the first six of
seven days was only primary
sludge, and the seventh sample
was a flow-proportioned
composite of both the primary and
secondary sludges.
The primary sludge sample point
was a tap off of the sludge pump
which was used to transport the
primary sludge from the raw
sludge well to the sludge holding
tanks. The pumping of the sludge
was not a continuous operation
and required that samples be
taken during the three daily
pumping periods. The samples
were grabbed from the tap on the
pump (after an appropriate purge
time) after an initial startup period
of between 10 and 1 5 minutes
and before the end of the
pumping period when the sludge
would become too watery to yield
a representative sample. The
primary sludge flow was read in
the sludge pumping building each
time a sample was grabbed.
The secondary sludge samples
were taken only on the last day of
sampling, as this was the only
time during the 7-day sampling
period when any secondary
sludge was wasted. Two samples
of the secondary sludge were
grabbed, one before and one after
the thickening process. With each
sample, an appropriate amount
(by flow) was composited with the
primary sludge sample for that
time period. The secondary sludge
sample prior to thickening was
grabbed as it flowed into the
holding tank (after pumping frcm
secondary clanfiers). The
secondary sludge sample, after
thickening, was grabbed by
dipping into the surface layer of
thickened sludge on the discharge
end of the sludge thickening unit.
No accurate flow measurements
of the flow of this secondary
sludge were available. Therefore,
an operator estimate was used for
the flow information.
W
-------
Pre-chlorinated Effluent
The pre-chlorinatedeffluent
sample point was located in the
discharge trough of the secondary
clarifiers after all the flows of the
clarifiers had converged and were
flowing to the chlorination
chamber. An automatic sampler
was set up at this point (Figure
IV-2) to obtain the composite
sample. The automatic sampler
tubing was also secured with
conduit facing into the
wastewater flow. The grab
samples were taken at the same
sample point.
Rnal Effluent
Thefinal effluent sampling point
was at the overflow weir of the
chlorine contact chamber just
prior to the flow into the
discharge fiume (Figure IV-3). The
sample point was approximately
20 feet below ground level, and
samples were collected with an
automatic sampler and a glass
beaker dipping pole. As with the
other automatic sampler points.
the sampler tubing was rigidly
held by a fixed piece of conduit
facing upstream.
Tap Water
One tap water sample was taken
at Plant B to obtain background
information on the city water
supply. The sample point chosen
was the water tap in the sludge
concentration tank's control
building, which was being used
as a staging area by the sampling
crew. Each of the sample bottles
was filled directly from the tap.
Figure IV- 2. Prachtorinnad affluent sampling point PWnt 8.
-------
Figure IV-3. Final effluent sampling
point Plant B.
-------
V. SAMPLING
Sampling Frequency
The sampling activities at both of
the pilot study POTW's were
scheduled over a 1 -week period
so that information could be
gathered on operational and
pollutant loading variations on
individual days.
Sampling at Plant A spanned 14
days. Saturday, July 22, 1978 to
Saturday, August 5,1978, with
the general all-points samplng
taking place onlyduring the first
seven days and sampling of the
influent only during the second
seven days. Similarly, at Plant B,
the seven days of sampling were
Sunday, August 6,1978 to
Sunday, August 13.1978.
To obtain a cross section of
pollutant levels through the
treatment plants, multiple grabs
were taken during each 24-hour
sampling period (0800-0800). As
a result grab samples were taken
six times daily (1000,1400,1800,
2200,0200, 0600). During the
second week at Plant A when only
the influent was being sampled,
grab times were moved ahead
two hours to coincide with the 24-
hour composite (0800.1200,
1600. 2000, 2400, 0400).
Sampling Techniques
Identical sampling techniques
were used at both POTW's
throughout the study, and unless
noted below, sampling protocols
developed by the EPA were
followed.
To obtain the most representative
sample from each sample point,
automatic samplers (Figure V-1)
were used wherever possible to
gather frequent, equal-sized
sample aliquots. This procedure
was only possible where flows
were continuous and accessible
to automatic sampling equipment.
At each POTW, the influent and
effluent streams were easily
accessible and could be sampled
at points where the flow was
representative of the total plant
influent and effluents, respective-
ly. On the other hand, a sample
point for primary sludge at Plant A
posed special problems where
waste flow was confined to a
pipe; thus, as a result, the only
feasible method for retrieving a
sample involved opening a gate
valve. Because the valve tended
to clog, repeated opening and
closing was required to avoid
backups or blockages. For such
sample points manual
compositing had to be employed.
Each sample point presented its
own peculiarities and had to be
handled individually. No single
standard technique coud be
developed to cover all sample
points under all situations.
Sample Collection Procedures
For those samples which could be
collected using automatic
samplers, tubing was changed
once per day. and sampler blanks
were run at the beginning of each
day's new composite. The
automatic samplers were
calibrated to pull sample aliquots
of at least 100 ml at time intervals
not to exceed 30 minutes.
Composites in the automatic
samplers were collected in 2.5-
gallon glass jars which were kept
in an ice bath at 4°C for the entire
24-hour period of sampling.
3CK
13
-------
Figure V-1. Automatic Mmpt*r.
For those composite samples
which could not be gathered by
automatic samplers, aliguots
were taken with the regular grab
samples and composited into jugs
which were kept in an ice bath at
At sample points in the two pilot
study POTW's. except for the two
tap water sample points and the
vacuum filter filtrate sample point
at Plant A. the sample containers
were filled via an intermediate
gathering beaker of glass or
stainless steel. The intermediate
beakers were used to obtain the
most representative sample.
while maintaining accuracy and
safety. Safety was an important
factor, since many sampling
points were constructed in a
fashion that precluded direct
collection of grab samples. Stain-
less steel and glass beakers were
used exclusively as the interme-
diate beakers because these two
materials are defined in the EPA
sampling protocol as having
characteristics such that they will
not contaminate the samples, nor
will they contribute any extra
pollutants by deterioration or
breakdown that might be detected
in the wastewater analysis. Each
sample point at each plant had its
own beaker to eliminate cross
contamination, and each
sampling container was
thoroughly rinsed with new
sample prior to each sample
collection.
14
-------
At the two tap water sample
points the flow from the taps
could be regulated so as to
facilitate direct filling of the
sample containers. At the vacuum
filter filtrate sample point in Plant
A, the only way to obtain a sample
was off of the vacuum line. By
inserting a plastic bonJe (which
had been used repeatedly for this
purpose) into an exposed air port,
a disruption of the vacuum
caused some of the filtrate to be
deposited in the bottle. This
plastic bottle was thoroughly
rinsed with sample prior to each
use.
Protocol and Protocol
Modifications
Samples from both plants were
collected in accordance with EPA
protocols, including the proper
preparation of bottles, the
addition of prescribed
preservatives and the collection of
appropriate sampler blanks. All
samples were shipped by air to
the appropriate laboratories
within prescribed time limits and
were analyzed according to
protocols for organic analysis.
Metals from influent and effluent
samples were analyzed according
to protocols developed by EPA for
priority pollutants. Metals from
influent and effluent samples
were analyzed by EPA's Region
VII laboratory, using Plasma
Atomic Emission Spectroscopy
supplemented with flamsless
atomic absorption spectrophoto-
metry, where appropriate.
Organic priority pollutants from
influent and effluent samples
were analyzed by an EPA contract
laboratory utilizing liquid-liquid
extraction and gas chromatog-
raphy-mass spectroscopy (gc-ms)
for the acid and base neutral
fractions, electron capture gas
chromatography for pesticides,
and purge and trap followed by
gc-ms for volatile organics. All
sludge samples were analyzed bv
the EPA contractor laboratory
who developed some of the
specific protocols for priority
pollutant analysis of sludge
samples during the study.
Conventional pollutant analyses
for all samples were performed by
a branch office of this same
laboratory in a different city.
The aforementioned protocol was
followed as closely as possible
during the pilot study but, in
certain instances, modifications
were required to suit individual
sampling situations. Specific
modifications to the protocol are
discussed below.
The protocol states that Teflon
tubing should be used on all
automatic sampler applications.
For this initial screening vinyl
tubing was used instead. This
tubing was thoroughly purged
with distilled water prior to its
use, and a sampler blank was run
on each piece of tubing daily at
each site before the sampler was
started.
The method of grabbing samples
via an intermediate vessel is a
modification to the protocol for
fractions such as oil and greasa,
where the sample container is
supposed to be filled directly from
the wastewater stream. This
modification was made forsafety
and practical reasons since
positioning of the sample
container into most of these
waste streams was either
impossible or very dangerous, and
the induced error through use of
an intermediate beaker was of
lesser consequence. In all cases
where an intermediate beaker
was used, it was used exclusively
at one point for the duration of
sampling at the plant, and it was
repeatedly purged with fresh
sample at each sample period.
15
-------
VI. DATA SUMMARY
Major Trends
The priority pollutants detected in
the influents, effluents, and
sludges of the two pilot POTWs
are depicted in Tables VI-1 and
VI-2. These tables point out the
predominance of the solvents and
the phthalates in the influents. In
Plant A's influent, eight of the ten
most prominant pollutants were
solvents, with only one phthalate
and phenol detected in more than
80 percent of the samples. In
Plant B, the smaller industrial
contribution is evident in that only
six of the ten most prominent
pollutants are solvents, with the
remaining four being phthalates.
Phenol was not among the ten
most common pollutants at Plant
B.
The sludge and effluent data in
these tables also show that many
priority pollutants are
concentrated in residues, while
others are removed by different
mechanisms.
The occurrence of selected
conventional and priority
pollutants in Planr A's influent.
effluent and sludges is
presented in Section VII. The
organic pollutants with the
highest concentration in the
influent were benzene, 1,1,1 tri-
chloroethane. chloroform, ethyl-
benzene, bis (2-ethylhexyl)
phthalate, tetrachloroethylene,
toluene and trichloroethylene. All
of these parameters were
reduced by an average of 50
percent or more during treatment,
and all except chloroform were
detected in one or more of the
sludges. Metallic priority
pollutants which occurred at
relatively high levels in Plant A's
influent included chromium,
copper, lead, nickel and zinc.
These metals were all reduced at
least 50 percent during
treatment, and all were detected
at high levels in both the primary
and secondary sludge.
A data summary of the weekly
average concentration of selected
conventional and priority
pollutants from Plant B is
presented in Section VII. No
organic priority pollutant occurred
at an average of over 20^ig/l in
the plant's influent. The organic
pollutants which were present in
the highest concentrations.
however, were benzene.
methylene chloride, and bis (2-
ethylhexyl) phthalate. Methylene
chloride values must be viewed
with some suspicion since this
substance was used as a bottle
preparation additive. Metallic
priority pollutants which were
present at over 50jjg/l in the
influent included chromium,
copper, cyanide and zinc. (For this
discussion, cyanide has been
classified as a metallic priority
pollutant.)
16
33<
-------
TABLE VI-L
SUMMARY
PERCENT OCCURENCES OF ORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS
PLANT A
P PARAMETER NAME
TOLUENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
rETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROFORM
9ENZENC
3ISi2-ETHYLH,
PHENOL
ETHYLBENZENE
1» Ir 1-TRICHU'
t.l-DICHLOROI
DI-N-eUTYL F'
NAPHTHALENE
1.2-rRANS-DI
PHEfJANTHRENE
SNTHRACENE
OIETHYL PHTHALATE
IfJ-DICHLOROBENZENE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
5UTYL BENZYL PHTHAi
1 ,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
PYRENE
FLUOREN6
?ENTACHLOROPHENOL
FLUORANTHENE
iiJ-OICHLOR08ENZENE
1i1-DICHLOROETHANE
CHLOROBENZENE
CHRYSENE
1r2-BENZANTHRACENE
3ISC2-CHLOROETHYOX'
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
ACENAPHTHENE
1.1.2-TRICHLl
INDENOC1,2>3
i,2:i.4-oiBEi
1>12-BENZOPERYLENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
CHLOROMETHANE
1 > 2-DICHLOROPROPANE
PARACHLOROMETA CRl
2.4ri&-TRICHLOROFHI
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
1,2,1-TRICHLOROBEi
TRICHLOROFLUOROME'
0ICHLOROBROMOMETHANE
1 <2-[HCHLOROETHANE
3.4-SENZOFLUORAffTHl
CHLORODISROMOMETHANE
2'4-OIHETHYLPHENCL
J.J'-OICHLOROB!
2-CHLOROPH6NOL
ACRYLONITRILE
NOTES:
4AME
*IDE
:NE
rLENE
n.> PHTHALATE
ETHANE
7 7C100) 7
90)
S5'
73)
'41
74)
74 )
71)
"*1 )
42)
43>
33)
3S)
39)
331
2?)
29 %
2° '
24)
20)
13)
10)
10)
10)
10)
10)
7)
3)
5)
S)
3)
3)
3)
3")
S)
3)
3)
3)
3)
2)
21
2)
0)
0)
0)
0)
0)
0)
OTHERWISE
40
40
40
->-
7
40
7
7
i
7
7
7
7
7
•*
^
7
~
7
40
7
7
7
40
7
40
7
7
7
7
7
•7
40
7
7
7
7
7
40
40
40
7
40
7
7
7
40
SPECIFIED
PRIORITY POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED MERE NOT D6CTED
23 (
30 (
33 (
4
3
7
3
3
2
1
1 1
3<
2C
4(
1C
1C
~(
1 .
0(
1 (
1 1
1C
0(
0(
0<
0<
1C
1C
oc
0(
1 1
oc
' 'O'C
oc
oc
oc
oc
oc
2C
9(
0(
0(
2(
1(
1 (
1C
oc
IN
43)
75)
33)
57)
43)
19)
43)
43)
2?)
14)
14)
43)
29)
57)
14)
14)
43)
141
0)
3)
14)
14)
0)
0)
0)
0)
14)
14)
0)
0)
14)
0)
0)
0)
0)
0)
0)
0)
3)
23)
0)
0)
S)
14)
14)
14)
0)
ANY SAMPLES
7(
OC
100)
0)
SECONDARY SLUDSE
SAMPLES TIMES
ANALYZED DETECTED
(PERCENT)
7 2C 29)
7 7C100)
7 1( 14)
7
7
7(100) 7
6(
2C
36)
29)
•S
S
7 7(100) 7
7
7
-7
'
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
'
•"
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
4<
2(
OC
SC
3 (
6(
a(
0(
0(
oc
1C
0(
•4C
3C
1 (
OC
0 C
4C
OC
4(
AC
OC
2(
0(
0(
0(
0(
OC
OC
OC
OC
OC
OC
OC
oc
OC
oc
oc
37)
2?)
0)
71)
43)
36)
86)
0)
0)
0)
14)
0)
96)
43)
14)
0)
01
37?
0)
96)
86)
0)
29)
0)
0)
0)
0)
0)
0)
0)
0)
0)
0)
0)
0)
0)
0)
0.)
7(100)
oc
SC
3(
oc
oc
oc
oc
0)
71)
43)
0)
0)
0)
0)
7
7
3
3
7
5
3
3
3
5
3
•3
5
3
5
5
•^
5
7
S
S
3
7
3
7
3
S
3
3
5
7
40
3
j
7
7
7
^
7
9-
5
7
S( 71)
OC 0)
4( 37)
2i 40)
1C 20)
2C 29)
0( 0)
OC 0)
0( 0)
1C 20)
OC 0)
2C 40)
2< 40)
OC 0)
oc o)
oc o)
oc o)
OC 0)
OC 0)
OC 0)
1C 20)
OC 0)
OC 0)
OC 0)
0( 0)
0( 0)
OC 0)
oc o>
2< 29)
oc o>
OC 0)
1C 20)
1C 20)
OC -0)
OC 0)
0( 0)
0( 0)
OC 0)
oc 0)
oc 0)
0( 0)
OC 0)
OC 0)
0( 0)
6C 96)
OC 0)
1C 20)
1C 37)
OC 0)
OC 0)
OC 0)
1C 14)
34<
17
-------
TABLE VI-2
SUMMARY
PERCENT OCCURENCES OF ORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS
PLANT B
5-30-79
PP PARAMETER NAME
67 BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
66 BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
85 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
23 CHLOROFORM
44 METHYLENE CHLORIDE
70 DIETHYL PHTHALATE
6S DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
23 1.2-DICHLOROBENZENE
86 TOLUENE
4 BENZENE
69 ni-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
65 PHENOL
55 NAPHTHALENE
84 PYRENE
81 PHENANTHRENE
78 ANTHRACENE
71 DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
39 FLUORANTHENE
38 ETHYLBENZENE
29 1,1-DItHLOROETHYLENE
87 TRICHLOROETHYLENE
11 1.1.1-TRICHLOROETHANE
64 PENTACHLOROPHENOL
54 ISOPHORONE
36 2-6-DINITROTOLUENE
27 1F4-DICHLOROBENZENE
26 1.3-niCHLOROBENZENE
10 1.2-DICHLOROETHANE
48 DICHLOROBROMOMETHANE
51 CHLORODIBROMOMETHANE
13 1r1-DICHLOROETHANE
7 CHLOROBENZENE
32 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE
77 ACENAPHTHYLENE
76 CHRYSENE
74 3.4-BENZOFLUORANTHENE
72 1F2-BENZANTHRACENE
58 4-NITROPHENOL
57 2-NITROPHENOL
28 3.3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
3 ACRYLONITRILE
INFLUENT
SAMPLES TIMES
ANALYZED DETECTED
(PERCENT)
6 6(100)
6
42
42
42
6
6
6
42
42
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
42
42
42
42
6
6
6
6
6
4
4
4
4
4
4
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
42
6(100)
41(
40(
39 (
5(
5(
5(
32 (
31(
4(
4(
4(
3(
3(
3(
3(
3(
18(
16(
14(
10(
1(
K
1(
1(
1<
5(
4(
3(
2(
2(
1(
0(
0<
0(
0(
0(
0(
0(
0(
98)
95)
93)
63)
83)
83)
76)
74)
67)
67)
67)
50)
50)
50)
50)
50)
43)
38)
33)
24)
17)
17)
17)
17)
17)
12)
10)
7)
5)
5)
2>
0)
0)
0)
0)
0)
0)
0)
0)
FINAL
SAMPLES
ANALYZED
8
8
41
41
41
8
8
8
41
41
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
41
41
41
41
8
8
8
8
8
41
41
41
41
41
41
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
41
EFFLUENT
TIMES
DETECTED
(PERCENT)
4( 50)
7(
23 (
38 (
39 (
3(
5(
3(
29 (
10(
1(
7(
3(
0(
0(
0(
2(
0(
2(
14(
1(
K
1(
0(
0(
0(
4(
6(
IK
IK
1(
0(
0(
2(
K
0<
K
2(
3(
K
0(
68)
56)
93)
95)
38)
63)
38)
71)
24)
13)
88)
38)
0)
0)
0)
25)
0)
5)
34)
2)
2)
13)
0)
0)
0)
50)
15)
27)
27)
2)
0)
0)
25)
13)
0)
13)
25)
38)
13)
0)
COMBINED SLUDGE
SAMPLES TIMES
ANALYZED DETECTED
(PERCENT)
7 0( 0)
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7(100)
6(
0(
66)
0)
7(100)
0(
0(
0(
6(
6(
0(
1 (
3(
5(
5(
5(
0(
0(
2(
0(
0(
0(
0(
0(
0(
0(
0(
0(
7(
2(
0(
0(
0(
0(
2(
5(
2(
0(
0(
0(
K
0)
0)
0)
86)
86)
0)
14)
43)
71)
71)
71)
0)
0)
29)
0)
0)
0)
0)
0)
0)
0)
0)
0)
100)
29)
0)
0)
0)
0)
29)
71)
29)
0)
0)
0)
14)
NOTES:
ALL UNITS UG/L UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED
PRIORITY POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DECTED IN ANY SAMPLES
35<
18
-------
VII. ANALYSIS OF
RESULTS
Fata of Priority Pollutants
Impact of Industrial
Contribution on Influent Quality
As previously outlined. Plant A
accepts a large proportion of its
total flow from industrial sources,
whereas Plant B treats practically
no heavy industrial wastewater.
Tables VII-1 and VII-2 summarize
the individual influent data points
for these two plants. An examina-
tion of the two tables shows a
Significantly higher incidence of
priority pollutants in Plant A as
compared to Plant 8. In total, 52
organic priority pollutants were
found in the Plant A influent,
while in the Plant B raw
wastewater only 33 were
detected. Similarly at Plant A, 18
organic priority pollutants were
measured at above the detection
limit but at Plant 8 only five were
found at above detectable levels.
It was also found that Plant A
influent contained 21 organic
priority pollutants which were
absent in the Plant B influent;
only two organic priority pollu-
tants were found exclusively in
the Plant 8 raw wastewater.
Twenty orgamcs found in both
raw wastewaters had higher
average concentrations in the
Rant A influent, but only six
organic priority pollutants
common to both raw wastewater
streams were more concentrated
in the Plant B influent. It is also
interesting to note that 13 of the
20 organics found at higher
average concentrations in the
predominantly industrial Plant A
influent are solvents.
36<
Nine metallic priority pollutants
were detected in the influents to
both plants. Seven of these were
found to have higher average
concentrations in both influents;
only zinc was measured at a
higher level in Plant 8, as
compared to Plant A influent. It
should be noted that the tradi-
tional (conventional and non-
conventional) pollutant
parameters (BOD, COO, TSS,
residue, etc.) were also
consistently higher in the Plant A
raw wastewater, as compared to
the Plant 8 influent.
Removal of Priority Pollutants
Tables VII-3 and VII-4 depict
percent removals for conven-
tional, non-conventional and
priority pollutants at Plants A and
8. During the week of sampling,
Plant A achieved good removals
of conventional pollutants. 800
was reduced from an average
influent concentration of 201
mg/l to 13 mg/l (94 percent) and
TSS from 140 mg/l to 20 mg/l
(86 percent). Priority pollutant
metals that were present in
detectable amounts were also
removed reasonably well.
Antimony, arsenic, beryllium,
selenium and thallium were
never found above their detection
limits in influent or effluent
samples and percent removals
could not be calculated.
Chromium and cooper both were
reduced to less than 50jug/1 (90
and 86 percent removal, respec-
tively). Cadmium, nickel, and zinc
were removed somewhat less
effectively (59 to 65 percent sach,
on an average). Lead and silver
were both reduced to below their
detection limits, accounting for
the wide range shown in Vtl-3 for
their percent removals. Nine
organic priority pollutants were
detected in Plant A's influent at
an average of over 10^g/'l. Sight
of the nine (benzene; 1,1,1-tri-
chtoroethylene; chloroform; ethyl-
benzene; bis(2-ethyihexvl)
19
-------
TABLE VII-1
PERCENT OCCURENCES FOR PRIORITY POLLUTANTS
SAMPLE F-OINT:
5/30/70
PP PARAMETER
1 ACENAPHTHENE x
4 BENZENE
6 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
7 CHLOROBENZENE
8 1.2.4-TR1CHLOROBENZENE
» HEXACHLOROBENZENE
10 1.2-DICHLOROETHANE
11 1 . 1 .1-TRICHLOROETHANE
13 1.1-DICHLOROETHANE
11 1 . 1 .2-TRICHLOROETHANE
21 2.4.0-TRICHLOROPHENOL
22 PARACHLOROMETA CRESOU
23 CHLOROFORM
25 .2-D I CHLOROBENZENE
26 .3-DICHLOROBENZENE
27 f4-DICHLOROBENZENE
29 .1-DICHLOROETHYLENE
30 . 2-TRANS-DICHLOROETMYLENE
32 .2-DICHLOROPROPANE
38 ETHYLBENZENE
39 FLUORANTHENE
43 BIS(2-CHLOROETHYOXY) METHANE
44 METHYLENE CHLORIDE
45 CHLOROMETHANE
47 BROHOFORH
48 PICHLOROBROMOMETHANE
49 TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
51 CHLORODIBROMOMETHANE
52 HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
35 NAPHTHALENE
64 PENTACHLOROPHENOL
65 PHENOL
66 BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
47 BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
68 DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
69 DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
70 DIETHYL PHTHALATE
71 DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
72 1.2-BENZANTHRACENE
73 BENZO (A)PYRENE
76 CHRYSENE
77 ACENAPHTHYLENE
78 ANTHRACENE
79 1,12-BENZOPERYLENE
80 FLUORENE
81 PHCNANTHRENE
B2 1.2:S.6-DIBENZANTHRACENE
83 INDENOd ,2.3-C.D) PYRENC
84 PYRENE
85 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
86 TOLUENE
87 TRICHLOROETHYLENE
114 ANTIMONY
115 ARSENIC
117 BERYLLIUM
118 CADMIUM
119 CHROMIUM
120 COPPER
121 CYANIDE
122 LEAD
123 MERCURY
124 NICKEL
125 SELENIUM
126 SILVER
127 THALLIUM
NOTES: i> ALL
SAMPLES
ANAL YZED
28
82
82
82
2E
28
82
82
82
82
28
28
82
28
28
28
82
82
82
82
28
28
82
82
82
82
82
82
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
82
82
82
23
23
23
23
23
23
84
23
23
23
23
23
23
UNITS IN
-wunatK Uf— —
TIMES
DETECTED
(PERCENT)
21 7)
81 ( 99)
6< 71
91 11 )
1 ( 4)
1 ( 4 '
1 £ 1 )
71i 87)
19> 23)
3< 4)
11 4)
1 l 4>
79 ( 961
15( 54)
6'- 21)
1 4 ( 50 >
601 73)
69C 84)
2< 2)
75( 91)
8 ( 29)
2< 7>
82 < 100)
2( 2)
11 1 )
1< 1)
2< 2)
1( 1)
1 1 4)
23< 82)
71 25)
27C 96)
26 < 93)
11< 39)
19< 68)
1( 4)
I7( 61)
11 < 39)
S< 18)
1 ( 4)
5< IB)
11 4)
21< 75)
1( 4)
B( 29)
21< 75)
2( 7)
2( 7)
10( 36)
81< 99)
81 ( 99)
81 ( 99)
U6/L UNLESS
TIMES
DETECTED
ABOVE MIN
0< 0)
45( 55)
1< 1)
01 0)
0< 0)
0> 0)
01 0)
45( 55)
0( 0)
1 ' 1 )
0' 0)
0< 0)
67 ( 82)
0< 0)
0< 0)
0< 0)
5( 6)
18( 22)
0( 0)
281 341
0( 0)
0( 0.'
20 < 24)
0( 0)
0< 0)
0< 0)
0( 0)
0< 0)
0( 0)
1( 4)
0< 0)
9( 32)
14( SO)
1( 4)
1( 4)
0< 0)
0( 0)
0< 0)
0( 0)
01 0)
0( 0)
0( 0)
0( 0)
01 0)
0( 0)
0( 0)
0< 0)
0< 0)
1< 4)
S8( 71)
S6( 68)
49( 60)
OC 0)
O< 0)
0( 0)
21 ( 91)
23(100)
23(100)
57 ( 68)
16( 70)
1S( 65)
22 < 96)
0( 0)
18( 78)
01 0)
OTHERWISE
2) METALS AND CLASSICAL POLLUTANTS ARE
AVERAGE.
0- I
288- 292
0-
0-
0-
0-
0-
15-
1-
LT
0-
0-
43-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2 -
-
0-
e-
0-
0-
0-
0-
0-
0-
i-
i-
13-
25-
1-
1-
0-
1-
1-
0-
0-
0-
0-
1-
0-
1-
1-
0-
0-
3-
47-
35-
28-
1-
1-
1-
LT
124-
S5-
0.0-
LT
1-
LT
1-
NOTET
1
1
1
1
1
18
2
3
1
1
44
5
2
5
7
11
1
27
2
1
16
1
1
1
1
1
1
8
2
19
29
4
8
1
6
3
1
1
1
1
7
1
2
7
1
1
6
30
38
32
SO
50
2
12
450
191
128
61
0.3
98
SO
8
SO
NEWER REPORTED
MEDIAN
37
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
AS MOT
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
10
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
21
10
N-D
5
10
10
N-D
10
N-D
N-D
10
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
10
N-D
10
5
N-D
10
N-D
10
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
10
N-D
N-D
10
N-D
N-D
N-D
16
13
11
SO
50
2
9
372
154
24
41
0.3
66
SO
9
SO
DETECTED
MINIMUM
N-D
N-D
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-t'
N-D
N-ti
N-D
N-[l
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
10
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-P
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
30
50
2
2
63
35
10
20
0.2
10
SO
2
SO
MAXIMUM
LT 10
5*00
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
39
10
10
10
10
220
10
270
10
10
440
10
10
10
15
64
10
990
10
10
100
10
10
10
10
10
10
13
10
200
230
12
44
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
84
1SOO
440
440
SO
SO
2
39
1360
864
1280
216
0
347
SO
18
SO
3) POLLUTANTS NOT DETECTED ARE NOT LISTED
4) PP - PRIORITY POLLUTANT NUMBER
N-D - NOT BETECTEB
LT - LESS THAN
37<
20
-------
PERCENT OCCU«NaSL™"«ORITr
PLANT
—NUMBER OF—
SAMPLES
ANALVZED
PP
PARAMETER
TIMES
DETECTED
.PERCENT)
TIMES
DETECTED
ABOVE MIN.
AVERAGE
129 ZINC
BOD(MO-L)
COB(MG-L)
TOC(MQ-L)
OIL » GREASECNO-L)
TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS(MG-l>
TOTAL SUSP. SOLIDS(MO-L)
TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDS(MO-L)
TOTAL VOL. SUS. SOLIDS<«0-L
AMMONIA NITROOEN
ALUMINUM
BARIUM
IRON
MANGANESE
CALCIUM(MO-L)
MAONESIUM(MG-L)
MOTES:
MEDIAN
--18
130
433
240
40
LT
23 23(100) -44
17 27(1OO> 213
34 24<100> -»31
27 27(100) 203
79 79(100) 4»
S3 33( 99) LT 129 <
27 27(100) 939 970
^7 27(100) 175 130
27 27 < 100) 232 240
37 27(100) 113 39
•*7 27(100) '230 4300
^3 23(100) 1440 I'OO
23 23(100) 129 131
13 23(100) 2990 1770
23 23(100) 104 107
23 23(100) 33 97
23 23(100) 27 29
1) ALL UNITS IN UB/L UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED
-) METALS AND CLASSICAL POLLUTANTS ARE NEVER REPORTED AS NOT DETECTED
3) POLLUTANTS NOT DETECTED ARE NOT LISTED
4, pp - PRIORITY POLLUTANT NUMBER
N-0 - NOT DETECTED
LT - LESS THOM
23
32
190
39
13
6
670
77
130
36
3400
243
64
404
16
33
17
503
430
630
340
340
5200
1300
540
940
390
19000
2420
203
26000
134
102
33
phthalate; tetrachloroethylene;
toluene, and tnchloroethylene)
were reduced by a minimum of 50
percent. Only phenol was not
effectively removed. Carbon tetra-
chlorideand 1,1.2-trichloro*
ethane were each measured at an
average concentration of several
micrograms per liter (yg/l) in the
influent, and were not detected in
any effluent samples, resulting irt
a computed 100 percent removal.
During the week of sampling.
Plant B achieved modefate
removalsof BOO and TSS (74
percent and 30 percent, respec-
tively). The influent values for
these para meters (95 and 97
mg/l) were approximately half
those of Plant A. Metals at Plant B
occurred at relatively low levels.
Antimony, arsenic, beryllium,
selenium and thallium were not
measured above their detection
limit in either influent or effluent
samples. Cadmium and silver
were both reduced from several
l*g/\ to below their detection
limits. Cadmium, copper and zinc
were reduced effectively,
between 69 and 81 percent. Lead
and nickel were removed less
effectively. Organic priority pollu-
tants at Plant B occurred at such
low average concentrations that
percent removal data were not
meaningful.
Concentrations of Priority
Pollutants in Sludge
The concentrations of
conventional and priority pollu-
tants in primary and secondary
sludge and floatables for Plant A
are also indicated on Table V1I-3.
Most of the metais occurred in
high concentrations in both the
primary and secondary sludge.
Cadmium, copper, lead, nickel
and zinc were each found in
primary sludge at concentrations
over 100 times greater than their
concentration in the influent.
Alimony, arsenic, and beryllium,
which were never measured
above their detection limit in the
influent, were all measured in the
primary sludge. Chromium and
cyanide were found in the primary
sludge at 30 to 50 times their
influent concentration. Chromium
had a higher than expected
concentration in the secondary
sludge.
38<
-------
TABLE VI3-2
PERCENT OCCURENCES OF PRIORITY POLLUTANTS
SAMPLE POINT:
NUMBER Of
SAMPLES TIMES TIMES
ANALYZED DETECTED DETECTED
PF'
4
10
11
13
23
25
2c
27
29
22
Si-
SB
39
44
46
11
34
55
64
63
66
e*7
68
69
70
71
78
81
84
85
86
B7
114
115
117
lie
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
PARAMETER
BENZENE
CHLOROBENZENE
1 .,2-DICHLOROETHANE
1.1.1 -TPICHLOROETHANE
1 . 1-lUCHLOKOETHANE
CHLOROFORM
1 . 2-DICHLOROBENZENE
! , 3-D I CHLOROBENZENE
1 .4-IiICHLOROBENZENE
1 . 1 -DICHLOROETHrLENE
1 .?-IiICHLOROPROPANE
2.6-DINITROTOLUENE
ETHYLBENZENE
FLUORANTHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
DICHLORO BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROD I BROMOMETHANE
1SOPHORONE
NAPHTHALENE
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENOL
BISI2-ETHYLHEXYL ) PMTHALATE
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
ANTHRACENE
PHENANTHRENE
PYRENE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TR I CHLOROETHYLENE
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
THALLIUM
ZINC
BOD(MO-L)
COD(MG-L)
TOC(MG-L)
OIL 1 GREASE(MG-L)
TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS(MG-L)
TOTAL SUSP. SOLIOS(MG-L)
TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDSlMG-L)
TOTAL VOL. SUS. SOLIDS(MO-L
AMMONIA NITROGEN
ALUMINUM
BARIUM
IRON
MANGANESE
CALCIUM(MG-L)
MAONCSIUM(HO-L)
NOTES:
(PERCENT! ABtl'.'E M1N.
42 31( 74! 4( 1C)
42 2( 5) 0( 0)
42 3( 12) 1( 2)
42
42
42
6
£•
6
42
42
o
42
6
42
42
42
6
6
6
6
6
6
t
o
6
6
6
6
6
42
42
42
7
7
7
7
i
7
41
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
40
42
7
7
7
, 7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
1) ALL UNITS
2) METALS AND
3) POLLUTANTS
10( 24)
40 ( 95)
5< 83)
li 1"
lo. 38'
1 I ~" ^
11 17)
18( 43)
3< 30 >
39 ( C3;
41 10)
3( •»)
1 > 1"'
4( 67)
1 ( 17)
4 ( 67>
6 ( 1 00 '
6(1OO>
5< 83)
4. 67!
51 83)
3< 30)
3( 50)
3. 30)
3( SO)
41 ( 98)
32( 76)
14( 33)
IN UG/L UNI
CLASSICAL
0' 0)
0( 0)
0< 0>
0( 0)
0( 0)
0( 0)
Oi 0>
01 0>
0' 0'
0( 0)
0' 0)
3< 121
0< 0)
01 0)
0( 0)
0( 0 )
0( 0)
0( 0>
3( 30)
0( 0)
0( 0)
O( 0)
01 0)
0( 0)
0( 0)
o( o>
O( 0)
0( O)
1( 2)
01 0)
0( 0)
0( 0)
0( 0)
6( 66)
7(100)
7(100)
34 ( 83)
2( 29)
3( 71)
7(1OO)
0( 0)
2( 2V)
0( 0)
7(100)
7(100)
7(100)
7 ( 1 00 )
40(100)
40 ( ?3>
7(100)
7(100)
7 ( 1 00 )
7(100)
7(1OO)
7(100)
7(100)
7(100)
7(100)
7(100)
7(10O)
.ESS OTHERU1
POLLUTANTS
NOT DETECTED ARE NOT
AVERAGE
7- 14
0- 1
0- 1
1- 2
0- 1
1- 9
1- 8
O- 1
0- 1
1- 3
0- 1
0- 1
1- 4
i- ;
6- 14
0- 1
0- 1
0- 1
1- 6
0- 1
1- 6
8- 14
1- 10
1- 8
1- 6
1- 8
1- 3
1- 3
1- 3
1- 3
1- 9
1- 8
1- 3
1- 50
1- SO
1- 2
LT 4
71
34
77- 78
16- 30
0.0- 0
30
1- SO
1- 2
1- SO
278
93
183
70
24
LT 20
619
97
143
34
11700
337
74
1640
280
69
15
[BE NOTED
ARE NEVER
LISTED
MEDIAN
LT 10
N-D
N-D
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
.3
LT
LT
LT
REPORTED
N-D
N-D
10
10
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-Ii
5
10
N-D
N-D
N-P
10
N-D
10
1
10
10
10
10
3
3
3
3
10
10
N-D
SO
SO
2
4
67
55
66
20
0.2
31
30
2
30
302
96
180
69
26
12
610
87
140
42
11000
432
73
1370
271
68
14
AS NOT
MINIMUM
N-D
N-Ii
N-D
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
DETECTED
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-fi
N-Ii
N-D
N-Ii
N-D
N-[i
N-D
N-D
N-D
10
10
N-D
N-D
N-Ii
N-li
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
30
SO
2
2
12
39
10
20
0.2
11
SO
2
SO
111
73
130
6t
S
1
310
33
88
27
9000
262
37
110O
235
67
14
MAXIMUM
260
LT 10
13
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
180
10
10
10
10
10
10
19
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
37
10
30
50
2
9
131
72
240
79
0.
48
30
6
30
439
130
230
82
48
160
730
220
200
120
17000
1410
93
3610
334
73
16
4) ff - PRIORITY POLLUTANT NUMBER
N-D - NOT DETECTED
LT LESS
THAN
39<
22
-------
TABLE VII-3
PLANT A
•DATA SUMMAftY-UEEK 1 AVERAGE
DATE
JULY 79
JULY 79
JULY 78
JULY 78
JULY 78
JULY 78
JULY 78
JULY 79
JULY 79
JULY 79
JULY 78
JULY 79
JULY 78
JULY 79
JULY 79
JULY 79
JULY 78
JULY 78
JULY 78
JULY 78
JULY 79
JULY 79
JULY 79
JULY 79
JULY 78
JULY 78
JULY 79
JULY 79
JULY 79
JULY 79
JULY 79
JULY 79
JULY 79
JULY 79
JULY 78
JULY 79
JUL/ 79
JULY 79
JULY 78
JULY 78
JULY 78
JULY 78
JULY 78
JULY 78
JULY 78
JULY 78
JULY 79
JULY 78
JULY 78
JULY 79
JULY 79
JULY 79
JULY 78
JULY 79
JULY 79
JULY 78
JULY 78
JUL r ?8
JULY 79
JULY 78
JULY 78
JULY 73
JULY 78
JULY 79
JULY 79
JULY 79
JULY 78
JULY 79
JULY 73
JULY 79
,-ULY 79
JULY 79
JULY 79
JULY 79
JULY 78
JULY 78
jULY 78
JULY 79
JULY 78
_ULY 79
JULY 79
-ULY 79
JULY 79
PP
1
4
4
7
9
9
10
11
13
14
21
23
24
23
26
27
23
29
30
32
34
39
39
43
44
43
48
49
31
32
33
44
43
44
47
48
49
70
71
72
74
77
79
79
30
31
32
33
34
as
34
37
114
113
117
119
119
120
121
122
123
123
•126
127
128
PARAMETER
ACENAPHTHENE
ACRYLONITRILE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
CHLOROBCNZENE
1 . 2>4-TRICHLORO>CNZENE
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
1.2-OICHLOROETHANE
1 . 1 , 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
1 . 1-OICMLOROETHANE
1 . 1 . 2-TRICHLOROETHANE
2 / 4 . 4- TR ICHLOROPHENOL
PARACHLOROMETA CRESOL
CHLOROFORM
2-CHLOROPHENOL
1 .2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1 .3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1.4-DICHLOROBENZENE
3.3--OICHLOROeENZIOINE
1.1-DICHLOROETHYLENE
1 , 2-TRANS-OICHLOROETHYLENE
1 . 2-DICHLOROPROPANE
2 • 4-0 IMETHYLPHENOL
ETHYLBENZENE
FLUORANTHENE
BIS<2-CHLOROETHYOXY) METHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
CHLOROMETHANE
DICHLOROBROMOHETHANE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROOISROMOMETHANE
HEXACHLQROBUTADIENE
NAPHTHALENE
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENOL
3IS<2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
BUTYL BENZYL PHTMALATE
DI-N-9UTYL PHTHM.ATE
DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
1 . 2-9ENZANTHBACENE
CHRYSENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
ANTHRACENE
I . 12-9ENZOPERYLENE
TLUORENE
PHENANTHRENE
1/2:S.4-OIBENZANTHRACENE
INDENO(1.2.3-C.O> PYRENE
PYRENE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
.ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
THALLIUM
ZINC
90DIHGM.)
COD < NO-L)
TOC(MO-L)
OIL t CREASE t NO-L)
TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS(MO-L)
TOTAL SUSP. 30L1BS
-------
DATE
AUG.
AUG .
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG .
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG .
AUG .
AUG.
AUG .
AUG .
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG .
AUG .
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG,
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUO.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
78
78
78
76
78
76
78
76
76
7B
76
7E
76
-"a
^fc
'8
78
76
78
••8
76
78
7B
76
7£
76
76
78
76
76
78
78
78
78
78
78
76
78
78
-"6
76
78
76
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
76
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
Pf PARAMETER
3 ACCYLONITRILE
4 BENZENE
10 1 .2-DICHLOROETHANE
11 1 t 1 . 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
23 CHLOROFORM
23 I .2-PICHLOROBENZENE
2s> 1 .l-PICHLOROdENZENE
27 1-4-P1CHLOROBENZENE
26 3.3--DICHLOROBENZIDINE
2« 1 , l-PICHLORDETHYLENE
30 1,2-TRANS-PICHLOROETHYLENE
36 2,6-PINJTROTOLUENE
38 CTHYLBENZENE
39 FLUOKANTHENE
47 BRONOFORM
46 PICHLOF.OHROMOMETHANE
M CHLORODIBROMOMETHANE
54 ISOPHORONE
5" 2-NITROPHENOL
56 4-NITROPHENOL
e>4 FENTACHLOROPHENOL
60 PHENOL
70 PIETHYL PHTHALATC
71 DlnETHrl PHTHALJTE
7? 1 . 2-HENZANTHRACENC
74 3r4-fENZOFLUOKANTHENE
76 CHRYSENE
77 ACENAPHTHYLENE
78 ANTHRACENE
81 PHENANTHfiENE
64 PYRENE
83 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
86 TOLUENE
67 TRICHLOROETHYLENE
115 ARSENIC
117 BERYLLIUM
118 CADMIUM
119 CHROMIUM
120 COPPEF
121 CYANIDE
122 LEAP
123 MERCURY
124 NICKEL
123 SELENIUM
126 SILVER
127 THALLIUM
128 ZINC
BOD(MG-L)
COP(M6-L>
TOCCHG-L)
OIL 1 GREASE (hG-L)
TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS
TOTAL SUSF . SOLIDS(MG-L)
TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDS(MG-L)
TOTAL VOL. SUS. SOLIDS
AMMONIA NITROGEN
ALUMINUM
BARIUM
IRON
MANGANESE
CALCIUM(MO-L)
nAONESlUM(MG-L)
INFLUENT
N-P
0-
0-
-
N-P
N-P
*'-
o_
<~
«.—
o-
N-|»
N-li
I--]'
W-[l
o-
o-
f—
o-
) -
0-
0-
L r .0
4-
-J
54
T7-
16-
L u-3
30
0-
1-
o-
278
03
163
70
24
20
619
97
143
54
117OO
537
74
1*40
260
69
IS
I
2
10
e
2
2
4
-.
4
"~,
1
1
~
2
U
'f
e
'•j
5
5
3
10
V
3
30
5
78
30
SO
3
SO
TABLE VII-4
PLANT I
DATA SUMMARY
EFFLUENT FINAL
PRE CL- EFFLUENT
N-P
L 2
1 1
L 10
L I
L 3
N-ti
L 2
0.3
N-P
I *• .'j
N-P
L 2
L r
N-P
L 8
L 34
L 4
L «•
L 1 1
L 7
L c
L 3
L 1
N-P
N-II
N-P
L 1
N-P
N-P
N-P
L 5
L 5
L 0.3
L 50
L 2.0
L 2
26
11
NOT RUN
L 23
L 0.2
21
L 30
L 7
L 30
83
20
32
2°
MOT RUN
NOT RUN
496
12
7
1830
74
36
198
194
64
14
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
N-P
.
0.5
10
4
f
N-P
1
3
N-P
N-P
1
N-P
N-p
3
3
N-L
4
14
1
9
Q
6
4
3
I
N-D
1
3
N-D
N-D
N-D
6
7
0.3
50
2.0
2
"•»
10
141
20
0.2
20
30
2
30
52
23
37
33
8
4
364
19
136
12
3300
54
23
iee
166
63
14
PERCENT
REMOVAL
N-P
0- 91
N-P
N-P
33-100
69
81
S-10O
33
0- 84
81
74
69
33
66- 67
11- 84
9
80
3
78
72
90- 91
66
89
34
6
7
OS-'30/79
SECONDARY COM&INEIi TAF
SLUDGE SLUDGE MATER
N-D
N-P
N-P
N-P
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
N-P
N-P
NOT RUN
V
NOT RUN
N-P
35
N-tl
NOT PUN
NOT PUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT PUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
N-P
25
N-P
NOT RUN
-868.0
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
337
NOT RUN
MOT RUN
NOT RUN
MOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
MOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
MOT RUN
L 330
8
MOT RUM
NOT RUN
MOT RUN
MOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
MOT RUN
NOT RUN
41
N-P
N-P
N-D
N-P
N-P
N-P
N-P
N-P
N-P
N-P
~
N-P
N-P
74
c
W91
N-P
N-P
N-Ll
4
1490
N-P
N-P
N— p
N-P
N-P
8
43
8
N-D
91
91
43
61
336
N-D
39
149
L 12.0
303
8110
1070C
1690
7390
L 5.1
31OO
L 28
L 79
L 2
L 26700
8460
324OO
11900
3310
464
23400
21700
14300
12100
76900
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
"
L
L
L
N-P
N-P
N-P
N-p
75
10
N-P
N-P
N-P
N-P
N-Ii
N-P
N-P
N-P
30
10
N-Jl
20
N-P
N-P
N-P
N-P
10
10
10
1C
N— I'
10
N-P
N-P
N-P
N-P
N-P
N-P
N-D
N-D
N-P
10
N-P
30
50
-'.0
2
5
6
10
20
0.2
10
30
2
30
7
10
1
22
7
6
30O
3
85
2
74OOO
108
40
108
3
40
9
DAF
BLANKET
N-P
1 0
N-P
N-P
N-P
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
N-P
N-fc
NOT RUN
10
NOT RUN
230
N-P
33
N-II
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
13
230
N-P
NOT RUN
-888.0
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
2870
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
1100O
2800
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
MOT RUN
NOT RUM
NOT RUN
HOT RUN
ALL UNITS UO/L UHLfSS OTNeRUISE NOTEt: PP-PfllORITY POLLUTANT NUMBER: N-P WOT DETECTED:
MOT RUN INDICATES SAMPLES "ERE MOT COLLECTED OR D*TA MAS NOT BE£N RECEIVED
PRIORITY POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED WERE MOT DETECTED IN »MY S*MP1_ES
L- LESS THAN
24
-------
Several organic priority pollutants
that were detected at very low
concentrations in the influent
accumulated in the primary or
secondary sludge. Among them
were acenaphthene(0 to l^ig/1
average in the influent and 189
jug/I in the primary sludge); 1,2-
benzathracene (less than 1 and
479); 3,4-benzofluoranthene (not
detected and 675); fluorene (less
than 3 and 313); and pyrene (less
than 3 and 757).
Data from Plant B indicated the
same general trends (Tab(e VI1-4).
Chromium, copper, lead, nickel
and zinc were found in the
combined sludge at approximately
TOO times their concentration in
the influent. Arsenic, cadmium,
cyanide, mercury and silver also
accumulated in the sludge, but
occurred at overall lower levels.
Antimony, beryllium, selenium
and thallium, which were never
measured above their detection
limits in the influent, were all
found at concentrations below 50
fjg/\ in the sludge. Consequently,
no conclusions regarding build-up
of these metals in the sludge can
be developed.
Several organic priority pollutants
present at very low levels in
influent also were concentrated
in the sludge. They included
acrylonitrile (not detected in the
influent and 41 fjg/l in the
combined sludge); dichlorobromo-
methane (0 to 1 and 74); and 3,4
benzofluoranthene (not detected
and 43).
Mass Balances
Additional information correlating
the influent and sludge concen-
trations of priority pollutants is
indicated in Tables VII-5 and VII-
6. These tables show the
approximate pounds of each
pollutant present in the influent,
effluent and sludge from Plants A
and B, respectively. For Plant A
there was moderately good agree-
ment On the pounds entering and
leaving the POTW for most
conventional parameters and
metallic priority pollutants.
However, copper, lead and zinc
balanced poorly. Most metals did
show a tendency to accumulate in
the sludge. The pounds of
cadmium, chromium, copper,
lead, nickel, silver and zinc in the
primary and secondary sludge
were each 2 to 15 times the
amount calculated to be in the
final effluent. An average of less
than one pound per day of
antimony, beryllium, selenium
and thallium was measured in the
sludge of Plant A. Arsenic was
detected in Plant A's sludges at
over four pounds per day despite
the fact that it had never been
measured above the detection
limit in the influent.
For many organic priority pollu-
tants, the mass balance data
support the removal mechanisms
of either oxidation, biodegrada-
tion or air stripping. The most
striking example is chloroform,
where none was detected in any
sludge samples, despite an
overall reduction from 37 to 38
pounds per day in the influent to
less than 16 pounds per day in the
effluent. Similar tendencies were
exhibited for other refractory but
volatile pollutants, such as
benzene; 1,1,1 -trichloroethylene;
ethyl benzene; tetrachloroethyl-
ene; toluene; and trichloroethyl-
ene. Organic compounds which
seemed to build up in the sludge
include acenaphthene; dichloro-
bromomethane; chlorodibromo-
methane; 1,2-benzanthracene;
3,4-benzofluoranthene; anthra-
cene; and fluorene.
Overall, Plant B had lower
concentrations of priority pollu-
tants than Plant A and the
accumulation of materials in the
sludge was less pronounced. Of
the metals, only chromium,
copper, lead and zinc accumu-
lated to some degree in the
sludge, and all were present in
greater quantity in the combined
sludge than in the final effluent.
There were insufficient data
upon which to draw many
conclusions regarding organic
priority pollutant removal
mechanisms or accumulation in
sludges at Plant B. No organic
priority pollutants were present
at an average of over one pound
per day in Plant B's influent, or
combined sludge.
Mechanisms for Toxic Pollutant
Removal
Removal of toxic pollutants in a
POTW can occur as a result of
various physical, chemical or
biological processes that take
place within the treatment
system. The exact combination
of these phenomena affecting
any particular priority pollutant
depends largely on the nature of
the pollutant itself.
25
-------
»p PARAMETER NAME
: ACENAPMTHENE
3 ACRYLONITRILE
4 BENZENE
6 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
•> CHLOROBENZENE
B 1,2.4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
° HEXACHLOROBENZENE
1C 1 O-DICHLOROETHANE
11 IT 1.1-TRICHLOROETHANE
13 1 .1-DICHLOROETHANE
14 1 T1.2-TR1CHLOROETHANE
21 2 «4 .fr-TRICHLOF:L>f*HENOL
2r h-AkflCHLOROMFTis CRESOL
23 CHLOROFORM
24 2-CHLORDPHENOL
2i I.;-PICHLOROKEN;EHE
lc 1.3-DICHLOROhENZENE
27 1.4-PICHLOROBENZENE
28 3.3 -D1CHLOROBENZIPINE
29 1.1-DICHLOROETHYLENE
Vj 1.2-TRANS-DICHLOROETHTLEWE
32 1 .2-PICHLOROPROPANE
}4 2.4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
ETHYLHENZENE
FLUORANTHENE
KIS<2-CHLOM>ETHYO«Y>
nETHYLENE CHLORIDE
CHLnROHFTHANE
UICHLOROflROnOMETHANE
IHICHLOrVOFLUOROMfTHANE
CHi.ORODIBROMOMETHANE
HEXACHLOROKIITAHIENE
NAF'HTHALENE
F-ENT ACHL OROPHENOL
PHENOL
HS(2-ETHVLHEXrL' PH
BUTYL BENZYL PHTMALATE
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
PI-N-OCTYL PMTHALATE
70 PIE1HYL PHTHALATE
71 MMETHYL PHTHALATE
••2 1.2-HENZANTHhflCENC
->4 3,4-HENZOFLUORAMJHENE
-o CHRYSENE
7-» ACENAPHTHTLENE
78 ANTHRACENE
79 1,12-BENZOPERYLENE
80 FLUORENE
81 PHENANTHRENE
82 1.2:3.«-DIBENZANTHRACENE
83 INPENOU.2.3-C.D) PYRENE
84 PYRENE
BI TCTRACHLOROETHTLENE
86 TOLUENE
8- TRICHLOROETHYLENE
114 ANTIMONY
111 ARSENIC
117 BERYLLIUM
18 CADMIUM
1" CHROMIUM
20 COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAH
MERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
THALLIUM
TABLE VII-5
PLANT A
MASS BALANCE
yEEKLY SUMMARY (LB/DAY)
TOTAL OUT
FINAL EFFLUENT PRIMARY SLUDGE SECONDARY SLUDGE
E
.-
IS
-%^
3
0.36
4.7
2 . e
0.72
N-D
0.72
0.36
5. 4
0.36
— n . 2
1.4
0.36
0.36
2.S
43
17
22
38
38
1.5
V.I
337
148
14
43
0.26
75
38
6.3
38
FLOWS (MOD):
0.46 -
0.035-
0.58 -
0 . OV9-
O.OA4-
0.029-
12
0
0
0
0
0
0.023-
0.062-
0
1
0
« .A
0.84
0
0.-
0.50 -
1.6
15
IS
0.001-
0
0
0
0
1.3 -
1.8 -
1.3 -
-.3 -
0.84 -
4.3
0.12 -
o.oro-
•> _
1.8 -
0.79 -
0.78 -
0.47 -
4.2 -
0.22
11
296
340
4. f
146
0.24 -
108
0.3 -
2.3 -
0.022-
IHFLUENT
PRIMARY SI
SECONDARY
0.46
0.03:
4.1
0.099
N-Ii
N-I>
N-n
N-ll
5.3
0.029
N-II
N-II
N-II
la
1 .
1 .
1.
•> t
1 .
•j.
1.
N-D
1.1
5.9
3.2
N-P
11
N-P
2. 1
0.37
0.4
N-D
3.8
2.7
19
18
3.2
4.3
1.1
2.1
1.1
2 .4
1.8
2.4
N-I<
7.5
H-D
1.9
7.5
1.2
1.2
6.3
7.5
7.3
7.1
38
41
1.7
11
2TS
339
11
161
0.34
107
38
3.8
37
_
.UOOE
SUWBE
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
.L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
VI. 25
0.334
1.4?
N-P
N-P
3.5
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-rj
3.2
N-P
N-D
N-D
N-D
16
1 . 1
1.1
1.1
2.1
1.1
5.4
1.3
N-P
1.1
5.1
3.2
N-P
7.8
N-D
1.7
0.37
N-D
N-D
3.2
1.1
17
12
3.2
4.3
1.1
2.1
1.1
1.1
N-D
1.1
N-P
3.2
N-P
1.1
3.2
1.1
1.1
4.3
6.7
6.5
4.3
37
37
1.5
3.6
34
20
8
i:
0.300 L
30
37 L
1.3
37
0.44
N-D
0.46
0.039
N-D
N-P
N-D
N-D
0.0*4
0.029
N-D
N-P
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-P
N-P
N-D
0.023
0.042
N-D
N-P
0.740 L
N-P
N-P
0.6
N-P
0.15
N-D
0.046
N-D
0.53
0.21
0.25
6
0.001
N-P
N-D
N-D
N-D
1.2
1.8
1.3"
N-P
4.2
N-D
0.84
4 .2
N-D
N-P
2
0.790 L
0.77
0.770 L
0.390 L
3.4
0.1
3.3
39
209
1.700 L
126
0 . 008 L
36
0.028 L
0.068
0.006 L
N-D
0.031
0.12
0.07
N-P
N-D
N-D
N-P
N-D
N-P
N-P
N-D
N-P
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-II
N-D
N-P
N-P
0.044
N-D
N-D
3
N-P
0.48
N-D
0.36
N-P
0.049
1.4
0.83
0.51
N-D
N-P
N-P
N-P
N-p
N-P
0.001
N-D
N-D
0.054
N-P
N-P
0.054
0.12
0.0*8
N-D
0.087
0.026
0.009
0.27
0.77
0.12
4.2
221
110
0.91
20
0.031
41
0.28
2.2
0.016
26
-------
pp PARAMETER NAME
128 ZINC 1'
BOD(MO-L)
COD
TOC(MG-LJ
OIL I SREASE
TOTAL VOL. SUS. SOLIDS
AMMONIA NITROGEN
ALUMINUM
BARIUM
IRON
MANGANESE
CALCIUM
-------
PLANT B
TABLE UIl-o
MASS BALANCE
WEEKLY SUMMARY (LB/DAY)
5-30-79
»P PARAMETER NAME
3 ACRYLONITRILE
4 BENZENE
7 CHLOROBENZENE
10 1.2-DICHLDROETHANE
II 1-lr1-TRICHLOROETHANE
13 1.1-DICHLOROETHANE
3 CHLOKOFORH
:.2-DICHLDROBENZENE
1.3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1 -4-PICHLOROBENZENE
3.3--PICHLOROBENZIPINE
1 . 1-PICHLOROETHYLENE
31 1.2-PICHLOROPROPANE
3t 2>e-PINITROTOLUENE
2S ETHYLBENZENE
39 FLUORANTHENE
44 METHYLENE CHLORIDE
48 PICHLOROBROMOMETHANE
II CHLOROPIBROMOMETHANE
34 ISOPHORONE
55 NAPHTHALENE
57 2-NITROPHENOL
SB 4-NITROPHENOL
64 PENTACHLOROPHENOL
65 PHENOL
66 BIS12-ETHYLHEXYL> PHTHALATE
67 BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
68 DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
69 DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
70 DIETHYL PHTHALATE
71 DIHETHYL PHTHALATE
72 1,2-BENZANTHRACENE
74 CHRYSENE
77 ACENAPHTHYLENE
7B ANTHRACENE
81 PHENANTHRENE
84 PYRENE
85 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
36 TOLUENE
87- TRICHLOROETHYLENE
114 ANTIMONY
115 ARSENIC
117 BERYLLIUM
118 CADMIUM
119 CHROMIUM
120 COPPER
121 CYANIDE
122 LEAP
123 MERCURY
124 NICKEL
125 SELENIUM
126 SILVER
127 THALLIUM
128 ZINC
BOD(MD-L)
COD(MG-L)
TOC(MO-L)
OIL I BREASE(MD-L)
TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIBS(MG-L)
TOTAL SUSP. SQL1DS
TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDS(MG-L)
TOTAL VOL. SUS. SOLIDS(MG-L)
AftMONIA NITROGEN
INFLUENT
TOTAL OUT
FINAL EFFLUENT COMBINED SLUDGE
N-P
0.480- 0.910
0 - 0.032
0.021- 0.085
0 - 0.160
0 0.032
0 - 0.640
0 0.560
0 - 0.110
0 0.110
N-Ii
0 0.2oO
0 O.Olo
0 0.110
0 0 . 290
0 - 0.340
0.42O- 0.960
0 O.064
0 0.048
0 - 0.110
0 0.450
N-D
N-D
0 0.110
0 - 0.450
0.570- 0.910
0 u.670
0 - 0.560
0 - 0.450
0 0.560
0 - 0.340
H-II
N-H
N-D
0 - 0.340
0 - 0 . 340
0 0.340
0 0.660
0.059- 0.560
0 - 0.220
0 3 . 4OO
0 3.400
0 - 0.130
0.290- 0.310
4.8OO- 4. BOO
3.600- 3.600
5.20O- 5.300
1.1OO- 2.000
o.oi4- o.oie
2 . OOO- 2 . OOO
0 - 3.400
0.087- 0.180
0 3.400
19. OOO- 19. OOO
6370
12300
4710
1640
1.3
41700
6550
9610
3660
787
0.011- 0.011
0.16O- 0.280
N-D
0 0 . 098
0 0.033
N-D
0.056- 0.680
0 0 . 250
0 0.340
N-P
0 0.084
0 0.180
N-Ii
N-P
0.001- 0.050
N-P
0.0o4- 0.700
0.019- 0.230
0.002- 0.180
N-P
0.023- 0.280
0 - 0.250
0.84O- 0.920
0 - O.084
0.130- 0.720
0.380- 0.970
0 0.340
0 - 0.420
0 - 0.084
0 0.250
0 - 0.170
0.002- O.O60
0.002- 0.086
0 - 0.170
0.023- 0.023
0.023- 0.023
0.012- 0.012
0.016- O.440
0.087- O.SSO
0 - 0.016
0.010- 3.400
0.039- 3.400
0.003- 0.140
0.079- 0.210
3.600- 3.600
3.500- 3.500
9.900- 9.900
1 . 900- 3 . 200
0.001- 0.015
2.10O- 2.1OO
0.007- 3.400
0.049- 0.1*0
0 - 3 . 4OO
10.000- 10.000
3840
12200
S300
1460
0.4
44400
6910
12800
3900
242
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
N-Ii
0.270
N-P
0.096
0.033
N-P
0.680
0.250
0.340
N-P
0.084
0.180
N-P
N-Ii
0.04
-------
A sometimes overlooked
mechanism for the removal of
inorganic priority pollutants via
biological processes is the
uptake of trace quantities of
these pollutants as mtcronutri-
ents. These materials may find
their way into the biomass as a
result of being complexed and
incapsulated in a material that is
consumed by cells.
In summary, in terms of organic
priority pollutant removal, the
preliminary findings presented
herein indicate that aside from
standard physical and biological
removal mechanisms, atmos-
pheric stripping of refractory
volatile organics appears to be a
significant phenomenon.
Aromatic volatiles, which are
resistant to biodegradation, were
removed from the treatment
system, but not concentrated in
the sludge. It appears, therefore,
that these materials were air
stripped.
Polynuclear aromatics (PNA),
which are also biologically diffi-
cult to remove, exhibited a
different fate in the two POTW's
studied. PNA's are less volatile
than the other aromatics on the
priority pollutant list, yet these
materials were removed.
However, the PNA's were
concentrated in sludges at the
two plants. This seems to
indicate that for these less
volatile refractory materials, air
stripping is not an important
removal mechanism. Further
evaluations of removal mechan-
isms will be earned out over the
full 40-plam program.
Formation of Chlorinated
Hydrocarbons
At both POTW's sampled during
the pilot study, treated waste-
water was collected immediately
before chlorination and at the
plant outfall after chlorine
disinfection. Samples of the
chlorinated final effluent were
split creating duplicate aliquots
for analysis. One set was
analyzed as collected from the
outfall. The other set of samples
was preserved by adding
sufficient thiosulfate to consume
any residual chlorine.
The purpose of collecting dupli-
cate effluent samples, as de-
scribed above, was to study the
possible formation of chlorinated
hydrocarbons. If the preserved
sample was found to contain a
lower concentration of a chlori-
nated priority pollutant than the
unpreserved sample, it was
concluded that formation of
chlorinated hydrocarbons might
continue in the receiving stream
after discharge.
In Table VII-7 for Plant A and
Table VII-8 for Plant 8, summaries
of data showing the formation of
chlorinated priority pollutants
across the disinfection process
are presented. In total, evidence
of the formation of chlorinated
hydrocarbons was detected in 49
individual grab sample sets over
a 3-day period at Plant A and in
B9 grab sample sets over one
week of sampling at Plant 3.
By far the most common situation
was one in which the chlorinated
priority pollutant was not detected
in the pre-chlorinated sample but
was found at below the detection
limit in either Of the final effluent
samples, or both. Usually this type
of result would be considered
insignificant; however, since the
analyses presented herein were
compiled utilizing gc-ms, the
results obtained are meaningful.
With gc-ms, the identification of
an organic molecule is based on
an analysis of ion fragments
observed in mass spectra. If no
ion fragments for a particular
molecule at a specified gc
detention time are observed, the
result is reported as "not
detected." This is significantly
different from the results that are
reported at "less than 10." For
these analyses, some fragments
were found but not at proper
levels to assign a concentration
even though the material was
probably present. Therefore, for
parameters that go from not
detected to a value below the
detection limit, formation of the
chlorinated molecule may be
indicated.
The predicted higher chlorinated
hydrocarbon concentrations in
unpreserved samples as
compared to preserved samples
did not occur in a consistent
manner.'However, over the
course of the full 40-POTW
program it is expected that more
definitive data on these
phenomena will be developed.
46<
23
-------
TABLE VII--1
PLANT A 5-30-79
CHLORINE ON PRIORITY POLLUTANT CONCENTRATIONS
PRE- UHPRESERVED PRESERVED
SAMPLE
KATE TIME
7-26-78 1600
•"-27-78 1UOO
"-2/-7B 1800
7-28-7B 1000
7-26-78 1400
7-29-7B 0200
7-29-78
7--7-?B
-2»-7e
~-2'-'e
--2> -78
'-27-78
7-27- 7e
7-28-7E
•"-2B-76
V-2b- 78
7-2B-7B
7-2B-78
7-29-7B
7-27-78
'-27-7H
'-27-'B
7-27-7B
'•-1B-78
--28-78
/-2B-78
7-28--"8
7-29-78
C.60O
0800
0800
0800
O800
14OO
1800
O6OO
lOOu
1400
1800
1800
0200
020 POLLUTANTS UHICH DID NOT EXHI6IT INCREASED
CONCENTRATIONS AFTER CHLDRINATION ARE NOT LISTED
3) PP - PRIORITY POLLUTANT NUHBEK
LT LESS THAN
N-D NOT DETECTED
NOT APP. NOT APPLICABLE ( EXTRACTABLE PARAMETERS)
Results of Sampling Frequency
and Sample Point Selection
Experiments
Through the first seven days of
sampling at Plant A influent
composites were taken every
eight hours, starting at 0800 on
Saturday, July 22, 1978 and
running through 0800 on
Saturday, July 29.1978. During
the second week of sampling at
Plant A the composites were
changed to cover the entire 24-
hour (0800 to 0800) period. On a
daily basis the averages of the
three 8-hour composites match
the corresponding 24-hour
composites. The composites
which end at 1600 and 1200 have
consistently higher loadings than
the composites ending at 0800.
This phenomena is particularly
evident in the metals
concentrations which exhibited
much higher concentrations
during the working hour
composites (0800 to 1600) than
during the other two 8-hour
periods. Table VII-9 shows this
phenomenon for the first week of
sampling at Plant B.
This phenomenon would follow
the diurnal variation in the
wastewater flow and the work
day of the industrial dischargers,
combined with the detention time
of the sewer system. This timed,
higher loading of the priority
pollutants, which were not
detected in the Plant B sampling,
is further evidence of the contri-
bution from the industrial
discharges which was present in
Plant A's system, but not in Plant
B's system.
47<
30
-------
TABLE VII-
PLANT B
EFFECT OF CHLORINE ON PRIORITY
POLLUTANT CONCENTRATIONS
PRE-
UNPRESERVED PRESERVED
—SAMPLE
DATE TIME
8- 9-78 OOOO
B-13-78 0400
3- ,'-78 0200
3- ?-"3 1000
3-11-78 100O
3-11-79 08OO
-)- 3-79 0800
9- *-79 0900
9-13-78 OBOO
3-13-79 0800
9- 7-'8 0200
$-10-73 10OO
d- 1 o-">9 14OO
3-10-78 1800
3-11-78 0400
3-11-78 1400
3-11-79 2200
3-12-79 1400
3- a-. '3 1400
n- '-~a 0200
3- 3-78 1000
3- ?-79 1800
J- 1-79 J20O
3- 7-78 0200
3- -"-78 1400
3- 3-79 0400
3- 3-79 10OO
9- 8-79 1400
3- 3-79 1300
3-10-79 1800
9-11-78 1800
3-11-73 2200
3- 4-79 1000
3- a-78 14OO
1- 4-79 1800
3- 4- '9 2200
3- 7-79 0400
3- 7-78 1400
3- 3-79 0400
3- 3-78 1400
3- 3-78 1800
3-11-79 1800
1- 7-79 0800
3- i-79 1000
3- 5-73 1800
3- 4-78 2200
3- 7-78 0400
3- 7-78 1400
3- 9-78 [OOO
3- 3-78 1400
9- 3-78 1900
9- 9-79 1000
3- 9-79 1800
3-10-78 1400
3-11-78 2200
3-12-78 1000
3-13-78 0200
3- 7-78 0400
3- 3-79 1000
PP PARAMETER NAME
11 1,1.1-TRICHLOROETHANE
13 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
23 CHLOROFORH
23 CHLOROFORM
23 CHLOROFORH
23 l.Z-DICHLflROBENZENE
24 1,3-D1CHLOR06ENZENE
J4 1,3-OICHLOROBENZENE
24 U3-OICHLOROBENZENE
29 3,3--«lCHLOROBENZI»INE
29 . 1-OICHLOROETHYLENE
29 .1-DICHLOROETHYLENE
29 ,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE
79 . 1-OICHLCROETHYLSNE
29 .1-OICHLOROETHYLENE
2« 1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE
79 1, 1-OICHLOROETHYLENE
29 1,1-tllCMLClROETHYLENE
44 NETHYLENE CHLORIDE
44 HfTHYLENE CHLORIDE
44 METHYLENE CHLORIDE
44 (1ETHYLENE CHLORIDE
-18 DICHLUROBROrtOHETHANE
48 DICHLGROBRCmOnETHANE
40 DICHLOROBROHOnETHANE
413 OICHLOROBROnOHETHANE
46 OICHLDROBROnanETHANE
4d DICHLOROBRQnOMETMANE
48 DICHLORUBRanOHErHAHE
48 DICHLOROBRanOHETHANE
46 DICHLOROBROnanETHANE
48 DICHLOROBROHOnETHANE
=:i CHLOROniBROHOHETMANE
:i CHLORODIBROnOHETHANE
31 CHLORODIBROMOHETHANE
11 CHLORODIBROflOdETHANE
31 CHLORODIBRONOHETHANE
31 CHLORODIBROnOnETMANE
31 CHLQRODIBROnOnETHANE
31 CHLORODIBROHOnETHANE
31 CHLORODIBRONOHETHANE
31 CHLORODIBROHOnETHANE
44 PENTACHLOROPHENOL
3S TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
33 fETRACHLOROEfHYLENE
as TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
3S TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
31 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
9S TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
33 TETRACHLdROETHYLENE
35 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
35 TETRACHLQROETHYLENE
35 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
35 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
85 TETRACHLOROETHYLEN6
3S TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
85 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
37 TRICHLORQETHYLENE
37 TRICHLOJKJETHYLENE
NAT ED
FINAL
IENT EFFLUENT
N-D
N-0
N-D
N-D
10
N-0
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-0
N-D
N-0
N-0
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-0
N-D
N-D
N-0
N-D
N-0
N-0
N-0
N-D
N-D
N-0
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-0
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-0
N-0
N-D
N-0
N-D
N-D
N-0
N-0
N-0
N-D
N-0
N-D
N-0
N-D
N-0
N-O
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
Lf
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
N-0
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
N-D
N-0
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
19
N-D
N-Ci
10
10
10
10
N-0
N-0
10
N-D
10
N-D
10
N-D
10
10
10
10
N-D
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
N-0
N~0
N-0
N-0
N-0
10
FINAL
EFFLUENT
LT 10
N-D
LT 10
LT 10
3*
NOT APP.
NOT APP.
NOT APP.
NOT APP.
NOT APP.
LT 10
LT 10
LT 10
LT 10
LT 10
LT 10
LT 10
LT 10
LT 10
LT 10
LT 10
LT 10
LT 10
LT 10
LT 10
LT 10
N-0
LT 10
LT 10
LT 10
•.. N-0
LT 10
LT 10
LT 10
N-0
LT 10
LT 10
LT 10
LT 10
LT 10
LT 10
N-0
NOT APP.
LT 10
N-0
LT 10
LT 10
N-0
LT 10
LT 10
N-0
LT 10
N-0
LT 10
LT 10
LT 10
LT 10
LT 10
N-0
Unless diurnal variation and the
effect of sewer detention time are
to be subjects of further study, the
additional sampling effort and
analysis expense to do three or
more complete sets of composites
per day do not seem to be
warranted. Satisfactory results
may be obtained with a daily
composite.
Variation Between Various Days
of the Week
The presence of and variation in
influent pollutant concentrations
over the weekly sampling period
showed a few general trends. At
Plant A the priority pollutant
metals, especially chromium,
copper and nickel, showed a
marked increase during the
middle and latter pans of the
Monday-Friday work week, and
their concentrations dipped
during the non-working day
composites. The same general
trend with the metals was noticed
at Plant B, but with the smaller
industrial contribution and the
smaller wastewater flow, the
concentrations were not as large,
and similarly, the variations not
as pronounced.
A general trend for the
conventional parameters (BOO
and TSS) was not established at
either of the pilot plants. Both of
the aforementioned conventional
pollutants fluctuated up and down
throughout the 2-week period at
Plant A and the 1 -week period in
Plant 8 to such an extent that no
meaningful conclusions could be
drawn on the daily conventional
pollutant variation.
ES: 1) ALL UNITS IK Ufl/L UNLESS OTHERylSE NOTED
2> POLLUTANTS UHICH DID NOT EXHIBIT INCREASED
CONCENTRATIONS AFTER CHLORINATION ARE NOT LISTED
3> PP - PRIORITY POLLUTANT NUflBER
LT - LESS THAN
N-0 - NOT DETECTED
NOT APP. - NOT APPLICABLE ( EXTRACT ABLE PARAMETERS)
31
-------
TABLE VII-9 8-HOUR COMPOSITES VS. METALS CONCENTRATIONS1
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
'All units jjg/l
2Bottle broken
3LT = less than
July
0800
LT23
76
35
LT20
LT10
23
July
0800
6
361
101
LT20
27
149
20 — July 23
1600 2400
7 5
151 133
228 94
LT20 LT20
39 32
1 24 116
26 — July 27
1600 24002
30
1025
333
110
273
473
July 23 — July 24
0800 1600* 2400*
9
63
70
32
19
303
July 27 — July 28
0800 1 600 2400
9 22 12
321 870 364
152 207 119
LT20 117 21
20 269 54
303 362 347
July 24 — July 25 July 25 — July 26
0800
LT2
100
105
LT20
31
135
July 28
0800
9
372
157
33
75
197
1600
6
884
267
139
260
162
2400 0800 1 600
3 8 13
139 428 1360
128 154 864
LT20 41 216
43 39 347
379 1 90 503
24OO
11
563
205
29
66
223
— July 29
1600
39
455
154
44
63
345
2400
18
311
120
86
98
204
Due to the very low
concentrations of the organics in
most of the samples, little correla-
tion on a daily basis could be
drawn from the organic results.
The variation of toluene during
the first week at Plant A showed
increased concentrations during
the work week, but during the
second week, this trend was not
shown. With the majority of the
analytical results reported as less
than 10fjg/\ for these organics,
there would have to be a very
heavy organics discharger to the
system on a regular basis for
these organic results to show any
kind of a trend worthy of definitive
32
conclusions. The one organic
pollutant which did show up with
values consistently above the
detection limit was chloroform,
with a trend toward higher values
at the end of each sample week at
Plant A (except for the composite
ending on Thursday each week).
The values for chloroform in Plant
B were always below the detec-
tion limit so a similar comparison
could not be made.
Therefore, as discussed above, it
is apparent that day-by-day
differences may be more readily
apparent in treatment facilities
with larger industrial contribu-
tors, and the amounts of the
priority pollutants which are
being contributed by the residen-
tial contributors are small enough
to be diluted below the detection
concentrations by the time they
reach the treatment plants.
Source sampling at industrial
dischargers and selected
sampling under controlled condi-
tions (i.e., new sewer, little
groundwater inflow, etc.) of
49<
-------
totally residential areas, may yield
trends for those priority pollutants
which are introduced into sewers.
Potential of Additional Sample
Points
During the first week of sampling
at Plant A and the week at.Plant
3, certain additional points were
sampled to scan for priority
pollutant levels which might
impact mass balances calculated
for these or future plants. In addi-
tion, certain other waste streams,
should they be accessible, may
yield sufficient information to
warrant future sampling.
Sludge Dewatering/Tnickening
Recycle Streams
This waste stream is usually
readily accessible in the sludge
handling system of each POTW
and can be sampled to obtain an
indication of the level of pollu-
tants which are recycled for
further biological treatment.
Samples of the filtrate at Plant A
show that the priority pollutant
concentrations in these streams
are generally of such small
magnitude that they do not
warrant the effort in obtaining
them.
If this type of waste stream is
recycled in such a way so as to,
affect another sample point,
background sampling should be
practiced, on a case-by-case basis
only, to provide a total picture of
the flow of priority pollutants
through the POTW
Floatable
The pollutant levels in the float-
ables samples taken at Plant A
and the corresponding sludge
concentrations correlate reason-
ably well. However, since the
volume of floatables removed
from the wastewater is very small
when compared to the sludge
volumes, additional samples of
this type are not deemed neces-
sary.
Primary Effluent
One of the principal goals of the
40-plant sampling effort is to
determine the fate of priority
pollutants by calculating mass
balances. A more accurate calcu-
lation can be made if all factors
are expressed in the same terms
(i.e.. liquid flow in mg/l rather
than solids in mg/kg). To
accurately calculate mass
balances through the primary
treatment process, a sample point
in the primary effluent will be
needed.
Tap Water
The tap water sample is a neces-
sary background sample which
should be obtained at each POTW
so that a total understanding of
what pollutants are already in the
water prior to its use may be
ascertained.
Effluent Before Chlorination
Since the use of chlorine as a
disinfecting agent has been
questioned because of the
possible formation of chlorinated
hydrocarbons, the collection of
effluent before chlori nation could
offer a means of obtaining valua-
ble information. Should a
chlorinated hydrocarbon be
detected in ail the samples
throughout the POTW (influent,
sludges, effluent), its fate would
still be in question as to whether
it was removed in any of the treat-
ment processes or if it was
generated in the disinfection
process. This doubt on the fate of
such compounds would be
resolved should the wastewater
be sampled both before and after
chlorination.
Digester Supernatant/ Heat
Treatment Recycle Streams
Both of these waste streams are
concentrated flows which are
liable to contain very high con-
centrations of conventional, non-
conventional and selected priority
pollutants. Neither of these
streams was sampled at either of
the pilot plants, but each could
yield valuable data on the
processes involved and how they
impact the fate of priority pollu-
tants in POTW's.
T ul GOVWWWTWWTMCOWICtan -
33
-------
Water EPA^440/1-30- 301
Fate of Priority
Pollutants in
Publicly Owned
Treatment Works
Interim Report
by
Howard Feiler, P.E.
Burns and Roe Industrial Services Corporation
650 Winters Avenue
Paramus, New Jersey 07652
Program Manager
Thomas P. O'Farrell
Project Officers
Robert M. Southworth, P.E.
Arthur E. Shattuck
Effluent Guidelines Division
Water Regulations and Standards
Office of Water and Waste Management
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Washington DC 20460
-------
DISCLAIMER
The purpose of this interim report is to present the data from the first 20
cities in EPA's study to sample and analyze for the 129 priority pollutants
at POTWs in 40 cities. Although the report includes a summary of conclu-
sions, the reader should be informed that these are preliminary and based
on only one-half of the data. Final conclusions will be presented in the
final report based on the data from 40 cities.
ii
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section
I Summary and Preliminary Conclusions 1
Summary *•
Preliminary Conclusions 2
II Introduction 3
Background 3
Purpose 3
III POTW Selection <*
Selection Criteria 4
POTW Characteristics 5
IV Sampling 16
Sampling Frequency 16
Sampling Techniques 16
Sample Points 17
V Data 24
Overall POTW Data 24
VI Evaluation of Analytical Results 35
Impact of Industrial Contribution on 35
Influent Quality
Treatment or Removal of Priority 35
Pollutants in POTW's
Reduction of Priority Pollutants by 39
POTW Treatment Processes
POTW Priority Pollutant Mass Balances 39
Daily Variation of Influent Pollutant 42
Concentrations
Effect of Rainfall 42
Formation of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons 45
Pollutants Detected in Sludges When 45
Not Measured in the Influent
Correlation of Influent and Effluent 48
Concentrations
APPENDIX A - CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION CURVES 50
Figure A-l (Benzene, 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 50
Chloroform)
Figure A-2 (1,2 trans-Oichloroethylene, 51
Ethylbenzene, Methylene Chloride)
Figure A-3 (Tetrachloroethylene, Toluene, 52
Trichloroetnylene)
iii
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont'd)
Section
Figure A-4 (Phenol, Bis(2-Ethylhexyl) 53
Phthalate, Naphthalene)
Figure A-5 (Butyl Benzyl Phthalate, 54
Di-N-Butyl Phthalate, Diethyl Phthalate)
Figure A-6 (Cadmium, Chromium, Copper) 55
Figure A-7 (Cyanide, Lead Mercury) 56
Figure A-8 (Nickel, Silver, Zinc) 57
APPENDIX B - ANALYTICAL DATA RESULTS 58
Summary, Mass Balance, Percent Occurrence
of Pollutant Parameters (Plants 1 through 20-)
'j
54 <
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Table No. Title Page
1 POTW Characteristics 6
2 Summary of Number of Samples Taken at Each 18
Plant
3 Occurrence of Priority Pollutants in POTW 25
Influent Samples
4 Occurrence of Priority Pollutants 1n POTW 29
Secondary Effluent Samples
5 Occurrence of Priority Pollutants in POTW 32
Raw Sludge Samples
6 Summary of Percent Removals Achieved by 37
Secondary Treatment
7 Reduction of Conventional and Priority 40
Pollutants by POTW Treatment Processes
8 Mass Balance Summary 41
9 Daily Average Concentrations of Pollutants 43
in POTW Influents
10 Effect of Rainfall on Influent Metals Loading 44
11 Formation of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons During 46
Chlorine Disinfection
12 Summary of Priority Pollutant Occurrence in 47
Sludge When Not Detected in Influent
13 Correlation of Influent and Effluent 49
Concentration
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure No. Title
1 Correlation of Influent Total Metals 36
Concentration to Percent Industrial Flow
2 Cumulative Distribution Curves 38
55<
-------
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The Environmental Protection Agency personnel contributing to this effort
were Project Officer, Robert M. Southworth, Effluent Guidelines Division;
Program Manager, Thomas P. O'Farrell, Office of the Deputy Assistant
Administrator for Water Regulations and Standards; and former Project
Officers, Arthur E. Shattuck, Effluent Guidelines Division, and R. Dean
Jarman, Office of Research and Development, Center for Environmental
Research Information.
Additionally, we gratefully acknowledge the following Environmental
Protection Agency personnel for their valuable assistance and guidance:
Robert B. Schaffer, Director, Effluent Guidelines Division; Jeffery D.
Denit, Deputy Director, Effluent Guidelines Division; and John E. Riley,
Branch Chief, Effluent Guidelines Division.
Acknowledgement 'is also made to Burns and Roe Industrial Services
Corporation, Paramus, New Jersey, the EPA contractor for the project. The
following members of the technical staff made significant contributions to
the overall project effort and execution of the sampling program: Howard
D. Feiler, Paul J. Storch, Henry M. Celestino, Gary C. Martin, and Mark V.
Sadowski.
vi
-------
I.
SUMMARY AND PRELIMINARY
CONCLUSIONS
SUMMARY
In 1978, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) initiated
a program to study the occurrence and fate of the 129 priority pollutants
in 40 Publicly Owned Treatment Uorlcs (POTW's). The first phase of this
work was a two-plant pilot study designed to set operating parameters for
the remainder of the 40 POTW study. In October 1979, EPA's Effluent
Guidelines Division published a report summarizing the findings of the
pilot study work: "Fate of Priority Polluants in Publicly Owned Treatment
Works-Pilot Study" (EPA-440/1-79-300).
In this Interim report, data from the two pilot study POTW's plus 18 addi-
tional POTW's are presented. All 20 plants provided a minimum of secondary
treatment. At most of these 20 plants, a minimum of six days of 24 hour
sampling of influent, effluent, and sludge streams was completed. Each
sample was analyzed for conventional, selected non-conventional, and
priority pollutants.
Beyond presenting the occurrence and concentration of priority pollutants
in the 20 POTW's other specific phenomena and relationships are evaluated
in this report. These items include:
o Impact of industrial contribution on influent quality.
o Treatment or removal of priority pollutants in POTW's.
o Reduction of priority pollutants by POTW treatment processes.
o POTW priority pollutant mass balances.
o Daily variation of influent priority pollutant concentration.
o Effect of rainfall on priority pollutant levels in POTW influents.
o Formation of chlorinated hydrocarbons during chlorine disinfec-
tion.
o Quantification of pollutants found in sludges, but not detected in
POTW influents.
o Correlation of influent to effluent priority pollutant levels.
-------
PRELIMINARY CONCLUSIONS
1. A total of 93 priority pollutants were detected at least once in POTW
influents.
2. In general, the higher the industrial contribution to a POTW, the
higher the concentration of metallic priority pollutants in the POTW
influent.
3. Based on the 20 POTW data base, 50 percent of secondary treatment
plants achieved at least 76 percent reduction of total priority
pollutant metals, 85 percent reduction of total volatile priority
pollutants, and 70 percent reduction of total acid-base-neutral
priority pollutants.
4. Tertiary treatment processes reduced priority pollutants slightly
better than secondary processes. Primary treatment was less effective
that either secondary or tertiary processes. Activated sludge and
trickl'ing filter processes were about equally effective in reducing
priority pollutants.
5. Metallic priority pollutant mass balance was good, but some organic
priority pollutants in the influent were always not accounted for in
the effluent or sludges. This indicates that, in general, a portion of
organic priority pollutants are biodegraded or, in the case of
volatiles, stripped out of the wastewater.
6. The mass loading of priority pollutants in POTW influents was higher on
weekdays than on weekends.
7. Heavy rainfall increased metallic priority pollutant mass loading at
POTW's with combined sewer collection systems.
8. Certain priority pollutant chlorinated hydrocarbons increased in
concentration during chlorine disinfection.
9. Some pollutants not measured in POTW influents were regularly measured
at high levels in the corresponding sludge streams.
10. For many conventional and priority pollutants, as influent con-
centrations increased, effluent concentrations also increased.
-------
II.
INTRODUCTION
BACKGROUND
Priority pollutants enter navigable waters from a variety of point and non-
point sources. Prior to the initiation of this project, only scattered
data existed on the impact, occurrence, and removal of toxic pollutants in
POTW's. Very little was known about the quantity of toxic pollutants
entering receiving streams from POTW's or the ability of POTW's to treat or
remove toxic pollutants.
In this Interim Report, data obtained at the midpoint of the 40 POTW study
are presented. A total of 632 samples were collected to make up the 20
plant data base. Each sample was analyzed for conventional and selected
non-conventional pollutants, as well as 129 organic and inorganic priority
pollutants. The preliminary findings presented in the Interim Report and,
to an even larger extent, the final conclusions for the full 40 plant study
will provide valuable insights into the quantity and fate of toxic pollu-
tants in POTW's.
PURPOSE
The purposes of the 40 POTW study are to determine:
1. The quantity of priority pollutants in raw sewage.
2. POTW removal efficiencies for priority pollutants.
3. The quantity of priority pollutants in resulting sludge streams.
This report presents results of the analyses of samples collected at the
first 20 of the 40 POTWs.
-------
III.
POTW SELECTION
SELECTION CRITERIA
A goal of this project is to obtain priority pollutant data representative
of the type of secondary treatment facilities that will exist after comple-
tion of EPA's Construction Grants Program. Primary factors considered in
selecting the plants include:
1. Treatment processes
2. POTW size
3. Amount of industrial contribution
4. Type of industrial contribution
5. POTW operating efficiency
6. Actual flow as a percent of design capacity
7. POTW location representing all EPA regions.
The 40 POTW's selected for this survey represent the full spectrum of com-
mon secondary treatment processes as reflected in the 1978 EPA Needs
Survey. However, since activated sludge and trickling filter plants are
most prevalent, the 40 plants are heavily weighted with those types. Less
common treatment processes, such as a rotating biological contactor and an
aerated lagoon, are also included. Within the 20 plant data base, modifi-
cations of the activated sludge process such as contact stabilization,
Kraus, and pure oxygen are represented as well as some advanced waste
treatment processes, notably tertiary mixed media filters.
Although according to the Needs Survey the most numerous POTW's are in the
smallest size range, plant selection favors plants over 5 MGD. Two factors
serve as the basis for generally including only POTW's over 5 MGD. First,
although there are relatively fewer large POTW's, the large plants treat
the bulk of wastewater. In addition, the General Pretreatment Regulations
primarily affect only POTW's larger than 5 MGD.
Actual flow as a percent of design capacity is also an important selection
criteria. Plants operating well below capacity do not give a fair repre-
sentation of priority pollutant treatment _or removal. Although a few of
the 20 POTW's operated at a low percentage of their indicated design capa-
city, these plants generally had a significant percentage of the treatment
processes off-line during the week of sampling. For example, at Plant 2,
only half of the primary treatment capacity was in use when the plant was
sampled. Likewise, at Plant 8, only seven of ten primary and five of nine
secondary clarifiers were in operation. At Plant 19, routinely, only 65
percent of the design capacity is on-line.
4
60<
-------
With regard to industrial flow, POTW's ranging from zero to more than 50
percent industrial contribution are included. Similarly, industries in
most of the 34 industrial categories currently under review by the EPA
Effluent Guidelines Division are covered by the study. Few plants always
meet the 30/30 BOD, TSS secondary treatment requirements, but POTW's are
only selected if their operation is reasonably good. Finally, POTW's from
each EPA region are included. The number of plants selected are in propor-
tion to the total number of POTW's in that region. As a result, the more
densely populated regions are more heavily represented.
POTW Characteristics
In the following para-graphs short summaries describing the treatment pro-
cess for each of the first 20 plants covered in this Interim Report are
presented. Table 1 includes information on the basic characteristics of
each POTW. Each of the 20 POTW's provided some form of secondary treat-
ment, and every plant chlorinated its effluent before discharge. Some of
the POTW's practice in-plant chlorination for odor control. These opera-
tions were generally suspended during the week of sampling.
Plant No. 1
This wastewater treatment facility provides secondary treatment utilizing
the conventional activated sludge process. This POTW can provide primary
treatment for flows up to 300 MGD.
The treatment unit operations begin with gravity flow from the drainage
area to the bar screens and grit chambers, where lift pumps elevate the
wastewater for gravity flow through the rest of the plant. After the lift
pumps, the wastewater passes through pre-aeration, primary settling, and
into the aeration chambers. After aeration, clarification, and chlorina-
tion, the treated effluent is discharged to the receiving stream.
Sludge handling at this plant involves primary sludge thickening by gravity
thickeners, secondary sludge thickening by dissolved air flotation (DAF),
vacuum filtration and incineration.
Plant No. 2
At Plant No. 2, wastewater flows into a diversion chamber, where it is
pumped through a rising well and elevated to a height that allows gravity
flow to the rest of the plant. Following the rising well, the wastewater
passes through parallel grit chambers, comminutors, pre-aeration cnamcers,
and into the primary settling tank. After primary settling, wastawater
flows to aeration tanks, secondary clarifiers, chlorination basins, and is
then discharged. During the sampling period, Plant 2 had only half of Its
primary clarifiers and aeration tanks in use. This is why the flow at this
plant is reported as only 53 percent of the plant's design cacacity,
although for the units in use the actual flow is much closer to full capa-
city.
-------
ro
A
TABLE I
POTW CHARACTERISTICS
PUNT
Biological
Treatment
Process
Secondary
Design Flow, MGD
Avg. Dally Flow,
MGD, (Historical)
Avg. Dal ly Flow,
M6D(I) (Actual)
$ Combined/
Separate Sewers
BOD,mg/l,
lnf/EH(l)
TSS, mg/l
In»/Elfcl)
% Industrial
Contribution
Major
Industrial
Contributors
1
AS
120
105
91.3
40/60
215/13
175/20
30
Pharm. ,
Petro-
chemical,
Plating,
Foundries,
Coking,
Foods
2
AS
15
8-10
8(3)
100$
Comb
95/14
97/9
5
Grain
Storage,
Oil/Fuel,
Terminals,
Machine
Tools,
Metal work
3
AS
14
10-11
10.6
•100$
Comb
134/14
265/44
io
Poultry
Process,
Plastics,
Textiles
4
AS
120
80-85
83.7
50/50
152/22
164/43
7
Beverages,
Plating,
Palntllnk
Chemicals,
Foods,
Paper,
Photo
5
AS
25
26
21.7
100$
Sep
138/13
147/12
10
Auto.
Man.
Hospitals,
Plating,
Paper,
Photo
Process
6
AS
7.4
7
7.1
100$
Sep
263/18
632/27
38
Plastics +
Synthetics,
Foundry,
Bakery
7
AS
66
50
48.6
10/90
169/29
135/18
15
Plating,
Auto.
Plants,
Furniture
Man.
8
AS
50
20-25
22.8<2>(3>
100$
Sep
238/42
205/69
10
Auto.
Man.
9
AS
60
45-50
51.8
100$
Comb
113/5
149/14
10
Firearms
Man.
to
AS/TF
30/12
20/0
l6.5/6.9(3)
100$
Sep
242/16
222/16
5
Elec.
Plating,
Metal
Assembly,
Too UOle
Shops,
Plastics
Process
(I) Actual recorded value through total treatment (secondary or tertiary) during sampling periods.
(2) 2 MGD treated by trickling filter.
(3) See summary description In text
-------
TABLE I (Continued)
POTVi CHARACTERISTICS
PLANT
a
00
A
Ulolo
I00<
Com.
194/13 TF
194/9 AS
129/9 TF
129/8 AS
25
Paint,
Plating,
Aircraft
Han.
18
AS
100
82
62.6
too*
Coo.
206/37
266/21
50
Breweries,
Plating,
Canneries,
SI aughter-
houses
19
Pure (>2
AS
120
70
67.8<3>
loot
Sep.
379/37
187/22
20
Food
Process.,
Plating,
Leather
F 1 n 1 sh 1 ng
20
AS + AWT
143
100
119.3
toot
Sep.
247/6
421/5
15-22
Canning
Elec.
Paint
Man.
Deter.
Han.
(I) Actual recorded value through lolol treatment (secondary or tertiary) during sampling periods.
(2) Suo summary description In text
-------
Primary sludge at this POTU is pumped to sludge holding tanks where it is
combined with the thickened (via DAP) waste activated sludge. From this
point, the combined sludge passes to the sludge conditioning facilities,
where it is heated and pressurized prior to vacuum filtration. The decant
from the sludge conditioning system and the filtrate from the vacuum filter
are bled to the head of the aeration tanks. The filter cake is inci-
nerated, with the resulting ash being slurned to a diked lagoon on the
plant property.
Plant No. 3
At this POTW, the influent is prechlorinated, when required, and all
incoming sewer lines join together prior to the bar screens. The flow
splits through two parallel screens, and then into two wet wells. The flow
is then lifted from these wet wells and continues through the plant by gra-
vity flow. The two flows undergo grit removal and are joined together
along with various recycle flows at the feed to the primary settling tanks
(no pre-aeration is utilized). Primary effluent flows to the aeration
tanks, and after aeration, to one of two covered secondary clarifiers.
Flows from the clarifiers are combined prior to chlorination, and the
chlorinated effluent flows through one of two parallel chlorine contact
chambers. The two effluent streams overflow to a common outfall sewer that
discharges to the river 100 feet from shore.
Primary sludge is collected by a bottom scraper that runs continuously and
the sludge is pumped to a gravity thickener that concentrates it to eight
percent solids. Waste activated sludge is fed to a DAF unit where it is
thickened to two percent solids. The two treated sludges are pumped to the
sludge dewatering area where lime and ferric chloride are added and vacuum
filters produce a filter cake that is trucked to a landfill.
Plant No. 4
This POTW also utilizes the conventional activated sludge process.
Wastewater enters through one of three sewer trunk lines, which are each
monitored by a magmeter. The influent is prechlorinated for the purpose of
controlling odors at the plant. Recycle lines from the centrifuge and the
anaerobic digester flow into one of the influent lines before the three
lines are combined. From here, the flow splits into four parts, through
bar screens and four aerated grit chambers. After recombination, the flow
next passes through the primary clarifiers, secondary aeration tanks
(diffused air), secondary clarifiers, and the chlorine contact chamber, and
is discharged to the receiving stream.
The primary sludge, consisting of four to five percent solids, is pumped
continuously to anaerobic digesters. Secondary waste activated sludge is
pumped to DAF thickeners where 1t is concentrated to six to seven percent
solids. The DAF subnatant is returned to the aeration tanks. The
thickened secondary sludge is sent either to the anaerobic digesters or to
centrifuges. At the centrifuges, a polymer is added before the sludge is
-------
thickened. Thickened sludge 1s sent to an incinerator, which is fueled by
methane from the digesters. Ash from the incinerator is landfilled.
Plant No. 5
Plant 5 uses the conventional, or plug flow, activated sludge process. The
POTW is capable of providing primary treatment for an additional 50 MGD
during peak wet weather flow periods. Routinely, approximately two-thirds
of the plant's flow receives secondary treatment while the rest receives
only primary treatment and chlorlnation.
Treatment unit operations begin with gravity flow through mechanically
cleaned bar screens. Four centrifugal raw wastewater pumps lift the
wastewater approximately 35 feet into the plant where it then flows by gra-
vity through the various treatment units. The flow is split, passing
through two parallel grit removal basins, four comminutors, four primary
clarifiers, six aeration tanks, and then through the four secondary clari-
fiers. The secondary effluent is chlorinated and discharged to the
receiving stream.
This treatment facility stabilizes waste sludge by using a three-stage
anaerobic sludge digestion system. Digested sludge is disposed of in four
5-acre sludge storage basins. Digester supernatant is returned to the pri-
mary clarifiers. Methane gas from the digesters is utilized to fuel a
generator that provides power to operate blowers and pumps.
Plant No. 6
Wastewater is pumped to Plant 6 where it flows by gravity through
mechanically-cleaned bar screens and grit chambers. From the grit cham-
bers, the influent is pre-aerated and flows by gravity to the primary
clarifiers. The primary treated wastewater then receives secondary treat-
ment in contact stabilization tanks where it is mixed with return sludge
that has been aerated. The mixture flows to the secondary clarifiers where
settled solids are returned to the sludge aeration basin.
Waste activated sludge is withdrawn from the secondary clarifiers and is
pumped to OAF thickener units. The thickened slugde is combined with pri-
mary sludge and is pumped to a two-stage anaerobic digestion system.
Subnatant from the DAF units and digester supernatant are recylced back to
the contact stabilization tanks. Digested sludge is either hauled to land-
fill or dried in sludge drying beds.
Plant No. 7
At this conventional activated sludge plant, treatment begins when the flow
from various influent sewer lines passes through bar screens and through
four parallel grit chambers. The combined wastewater from the grit cham-
bers then splits and passes through primary clarifiers arranged as two
parallel systems. Primary effluent is aerated in aeration basins and the
9
65 <
-------
mixed liquor flows to the secondary clarifiers, after which the effluent is
chlorinated and discharged.
Primary sludge and waste activated sludge are removed from the primary
tanks and are pumped to two digesters used only as holding tanks. Sludge
from these tanks is pumped to a heat treatment system, which generally runs
continuously. Heat treated sludge is gravity thickened to 18 percent
solids and is then vacuum filtered to 50 percent solids. The heat treat-
ment decant, the thickener overflow, and the vacuum filter filtrate are
returned to holding tanks and are gradually recycled to one of the primary
systems. The gravity thickeners and vacuum filters do not run con-
tinuously. Conditioned sludge is incinerated.
Plant No. 8
This facility uses a combination of trickling filter and activated sludge
processes to provide secondary wastewater treatment. Microscreens and re-
aeration basins provide additional advanced wastewater treatment. The
trickling filter process treats approximately 2 MGD with the remaining flow
being treated by the activated sludge process. Half of the aeration tanks
were not in use during the week of sampling, because plant flow had not
approached design capacity. This is why the actual POTW flow is only 34
percent of the plant's design capacity.
Raw wastewater entering the plant initially passes through bar screens and
aerated grit chambers before receiving treatment in primary clarifiers.
From the primary clarifiers, wastewater passes through the aeration basins
or trickling filters, secondary clarifiers, microscreens, re-aeration
basins, and chlorine contact tanks prior to discharge.
Waste activated sludge and trickling filter humus are thickened using air
flotation (DAF) and are then combined with primary sludge. The combined
sludge is then heat treated and dewatered using vacuum filters. Filtered
sludge is incinerated.
Heat treatment decant and vacuum filter filtrate are recycled to the plant
influent upstream of the bar screens. DAF subnatant is recycled to the
primary settling tank effluent.
Plant No. 9
This POTW treats wastewater using the conventional activated sludge pro-
cess. The treatment process consists of screening, shredding, grit remo-
val, primary treatment, activated sludge secondary treatment, final
settling, and chlorination. The unit operations used in the sludge handl-
ing system include thickening, filtration (belt and vacuum), and incinera-
tion.
Ash produced during incineration is sluiced to one of two lagoons, and is
periodically hauled from these lagoons to a local sanitary landfill.
10
-------
Plant No. 10
Plant 10 provides wastewater treatment using a combination of the activated
sludge process and trickling filter process. The plant also operates a 9
MGD sand filter for tertiary treatment. All of the filtered water is sold
as irrigation water, and none is discharged. Tertiary filter backwash is
sent to the head of the trickling filter plant.
Influent to the POTW enters from several sewer lines, is combined in a wet
well, and then divides between the two plants. Bar screens, grit chambers,
and comminutors are utilized before primary treatment. The wastewatar then
passes through primary clarifiers. In the activated sludge plant, the
wastewater flows to one of three aeration tanks. Each tank utilizes both
mechanical and diffused aeration, and feeds one of four secondary clari-
fiers. The secondary clarifiers incorporate a chlorine contact chamber,
which is concentric to the tanks. Wastewater flows outward from the
overflow weir along the circumference of the tank. After chlorination, the
flow from the secondary tanks recombines prior to discharge.
Primary sludge from the activated sludge plant is degritted, gravity
thickened, vacuum filtered and pumped to an anaerobic digester. Overflow
from the gravity thickener is returned to the secondary system, and vacuum
filter filtrate is recycled to the primary influent. Return activated
sludge is recycled to the aeration tanks, and waste activated sludge (along
with scum) is centrifuged and pumped to an aerobic digester. The centri-
fuge thickens sludge from 1/Z to 2 percent solids, and the centrate is
returned to the primary effluent.
After primary treatment, the wastewater in the trickling filter plant flows
through one of three trickling filters (two are currently in use). Two
filters have redwood media and one has rock media. The effluent from the
filters is recombined and flows to the secondary clarifiers. Effluent from
the clarifiers flows through one of two chlorine contact chambers before
discharge. Secondary sludge from the trickling filter plant is returned to
the head of the primary tanks in the trickling filter plant.
Combined sludge from the primary tanks is pumped to an anaerobic digester.
All digested sludge from both the aerobic and anaerobic digestars is
trucked to a landfil1.
Plant No. 11
Raw wastewater entering this trickling filter facility first flows through
bar screens, grit chambers, and then additional bar screens. The influent
is both pre-aerated and prechlorinated, before it undergoes primary treat-
ment in one of four primary clarifiers. After primary treatment, the
wastewater is recombined and flows to one of eight trickling filters.
Trickling filter effluent flows to the secondary clarifiers and is then
chlorinated and piped to a drainage canal which flows to the receiving
stream. Trickling filter effluent receives a low dosage of chlorine prior
to secondary clarification for algae control.
11
67<
-------
This POTW also operates a post treatment system for some secondary effluent
by means of an activated sludge plant. Most of this water is used inter-
nally by the plant for equipment cleaning and lawn sprinkling. At times,
some of this activated sludge effluent is discharged with the total plant
effluent. One secondary clarifier is used exclusively for the post treat-
ment system.
Secondary sludge is recycled back to the primary clarifiers. Combined
sludge from the primary clarifiers and the waste activated sludge from the
post treatment system are anaerobically digested without intermediate
thickening or dewatering. Digested sludge is pumped to drying beds.
Skimmings are currently hauled away and dried sludge is sold as fertilizer.
Plant No. 12
The treatment unit operations at this facility begin with raw sewage
passing through bar screens, and then flowing to one of ten primary clari-
fiers. After primary clarification, the wastewater flows to mechanically
aerated basins and then to the secondary clarifiers. Final -treated
effluent from the secondary clarifiers passes through a chlorine contact
chamber and is discharged.
Primary sludge is' cyclone centrifuged for grit removal before it is com-
bined with the waste activated sludge. Combined sludge is then thickened
in gravity thickeners, dewatered on vacuum filters, and then hauled to a
landfill.
Plant No. 13
In addition to secondary treatment, this conventional activated sludge
plant provides advanced wastewater treatment by passing secondary effluent
through mixed-media filters. As the influent enters the plant, it passes
through bar screens, grit chambers and then splits at a ratio of two to one
into two parallel primary and secondary treatment systems.
Effluent from the secondary clarifiers flows to screw pumps where it is
lifted to mixed-media filters. The wastewater then flows by gravity
through the filters and is discharged. The primary and waste activated
sludges are combined and then anaerobically digested. Digested sludge is
applied as fertilizer to farmlands.
Plant No. 14
This treatment plant provides secondary treatment using the activated
sludge process. As the wastewater enters the plant, it passes through bar
screens, comminutors and is then pumped to an aerated grit chamber.
Wastewater then passes through primary clarifiers and an aeration tank.
From the aeration tank, the wastewater passes through secondary clarifiers,
and a chlorine contact chamber prior to discharge.
12
68<
-------
Waste activated sludge Is recycled to the primary clarifiers. The combined
sludge is pumped to a nearby plant for final disposal after it has been
digested by a two-stage anaerobic digestion system.
Actual flow is reported as only 54 percent of design capacity at this
plant. The correct percent of design capacity in use is much higher
because certain sections of the plant were off line during the week of
sampling.
Plant No. 15
This 45 year old treatment facility provides secondary treatment using a
fixed nozzle 1 1/2 acre trickling filter. Uastewater enters the plant via
two trunk lines: one transmitting only domestic flow; and the other
carrying all of the industrial flow. The two lines receive separate treat-
ment in aerated grit chambers, then are combined and flow to six parallel
primary tanks. Primary effluent is gravity fed to the trickling filters
and is followed by three parallel secondary clarifiers. Effluent from the
secondary clarifiers is pumped to a 2 1/2 acre polishing lagoon. A section
of the lagoon is baffled for use as a chlorine contact chamber.
Return sludge and digester decant are returned to the head of three of the
six primary tanks. The sludge from the primary tanks is pumped to
digesters, and is eventually dewatered on drying beds.
Plant No. 16
This POTW provides wastewater treatment using a unique combination of two
parallel trickling filter plants, followed by additional activated sludge
treatment, and mixed-media filtration. Of the nearly 150 MGD treated,
approximately 80 MGD receive tertiary treatment while the remainder receive
only secondary treatment.
The parallel plants are serviced by separate interceptors. Both systems
provide grit removal, and primary clarification. One system uses a two-
stage trickling filter configuration, and the other system uses a standard
single-stage trickling filter. Both systems provide secondary clarifica-
tion and pump part of their effluent to the teritary system. The remaining
effluent is combined with tertiary effluent, and is then chlorinated and
discharged.
Waste sludge from the trickling filter plants is treated by anaerobic
digestion and sludge from the teritary plant is treated by aerobic
digestion. Digested sludge is then pumped 22 miles for subsoil injection.
Plant No. 17
This plant was originally constructed as a trickling filter POTW, but has
been enlarged with the installation of a parallel activated sludge plant.
-------
The two parallel plants have a common head works but separate effluent
1ines.
The treatment unit operations of the trickling filter plant begin with grit
removal, followed by primary clarification, secondary treatment, and then
secondary clarification. The activated sludge plant treatment unit opera-
tions begin with grit removal, followed by primary clarification, aeration,
and secondary clarification. Influent flow is regulated to each system by
automatic gate valves. The activated sludge plant treats approximately two
thirds of the total plant influent.
Primary and secondary sludge from the trickling filter plant is combined
with primary sludge from the activated sludge plant and is then thickened
and anaerobically digested. Waste activated sludge from the activated
sludge plant is aerobically digested. All digested sludge is sent to a
lagoon.
Plant No. 18
Plant No. 18 provides secondary treatment using the activated sludge pro-
cess. When influent enters the POTW, it first passes through a grit remo-
val chamber and bar screens. After this preliminary treatment, the
wastewater flows to one of eight primary clarifiers. Primary effluent then
flows through aeration tanks to one of eight secondary clarifiers. Final
secondary effluent is chlorinated* with contact occurring in a three-mile
long underground discharge sewer.
Primary sludge is processed by cyclone degritters, gravity thickeners, and
anaerobic digesters. The waste activated sludge is centrifuged before
aerobic digestion. All digested sludge is stored in a lagoon for land
application. Sludge from two -other POTW's, accounting for approximately
ten percent of the total sludge, is pumped to this plant and treated in the
digesters.
Plant No. 19
This POTW, recently upgraded from a primary to a secondary treatment faci-
lity, utilizes the high purity oxygen activated sludge process. Wastewater
is prechlorinated in an influent wet well, passes through bar screens, grit
chambers, aerated grit chambers (high flow periods only), primary sedimen-
tation, and into the pure oxygen reactors. Secondary effluent after clari-
fication is chlorinated and then dechlorinated using sulfur dioxide before
discharge to a 1-1/2 mile underground outfall sewer.
Waste activated sludge is centrifuged and combined with the primary sludge
for anaerobic digestion. Digested sludge is vacuum filtered. The digester
supernatant and vacuum filter filtrate are combined with other recycle
lines (scum thickener supernatant, grit dewatering overflow, and cooling
water from the oxygen generator) and returned to the headworks prior to the
bar screens.
14
70<
-------
Although the actual flow is reported as only 55 percent of design flow,
since entire treatment units were not in operation, this percent is low.
True plant utilization was much higher.
Plant No. 20
This advanced wastewater treatment facility currently uses the Kraus nitri-
fication modification of the activated sludge process. Wastewater enters
this facility in three trunklines, combining just prior to bar screens.
After screening, the wastewater passes through eight parallel grit tanks
and into a set of 26 primary sedimentation tanks. Effluent from primary
settling is combined and flows to the 16 aeration tanks and to a system of
26 secondary clarifiers. Effluent from all clarifiers is comoined
underground and flows to one of two parallel nitrification systems.
Nitrified effluent is pumped to four mixed media filters. Filtered
effluent is chlorinated and dechlorinated prior to discharge.
All recycle lines (filter wash water, drying bed decant) enter the system
at the discharge from the grit tanks. Waste activated sludges and nitrifi-
cation sludges are OAF thickened, combined with the primary sludge, and
digested anaerobically. The digested sludge is dewatered on drying beds.
-------
IV.
SAMPLING
SAMPLING FREQUENCY
A six day sampling period, excluding Sundays, was selected for this study
based on both the findings of the Pilot Study and logistic and budgetary
factors. Consequently, for 16 of the 20 POTW's covered, six days of
sampling were completed. At Plants 3 and 8, only, four days of sampling
were completed. For Plant 3, the shorter sampling period was planned to
permit analytical capacity for three 8-hour influent composites per day.
At Plant 8, POTW operating problems necessitated shortening the sampling
program. The only exception to no Sunday sampling was a set of samples
collected at Plant 9 on a Sunday. This sample was collected to coordinate
sampling periods with another EPA project occurring simultaneously in the
same city.
The two POTW's covered in the Pilot Study (Plants 1 and 2) were sampled for
a longer period of time and more intensely than those sampled afterward.
At Plant 1, influent, effluent, and sludge streams were sampled over 24
hours for seven consecutive days. Influent was collected three times daily
as 8-hour composites during the first seven consecutive days, and then as
one 24-hour composite daily for an additional seven days. At Plant 2,
seven consecutive days of 24-hour sampling were completed.
SAMPLING TECHNIQUES
Generally, uniform sampling techniques were used at the POTW's sampled in
this study. These techniques are described in detail in the Pilot Study
report. To obtain the most representative sample from each sample point,
automatic samplers were used wherever possible to gather frequent equal-
sized sample aliquots. This procedure was only possible where flows were
continuous and accessible by automatic sampling equipment.
At the early plants, automatic sampler tubing was changed daily and sampler
blanks were run before beginning each day's new composite. Later in the
program, for budgetary reasons, this procedure was discontinued, with fresh
Teflon tubing used only when a sampler was set up at a new collection
point. The automatic samplers were calibrated to pull sample aliquots of
at least 100 ml, at time intervals not to exceed 30 minutes. The actual
quantity and frequency of sample aliquots was governed by the depth of the
waste stream relative to the automatic samples. Composites in the automa-
tic samplers were collected in 2.5-gallon glass jars that were kept in an
ice bath at 4°C for the entire 24-hour period of sampling.
16
-------
In those cases where wastewater or sludge flows were intermittent or not
pumpable, such as primary sludge, grab sampling was practiced. Grab
samples were also taken where prescribed by EPA's sampling protocol. All
grabs were collected at least six times a day, and often more frequently.
On occasion, as dictated by sample point configuration, samples were
grabbed via an intermediate vessel. This method of sampling is a modifica-
tion to the protocol for fractions, such as oil and grease, where the
sample container is supposed to be filled directly from the wastewater
stream. This modification was made at a few sample points for safety and
practical reasons since positioning of the sample container into most of
these waste streams was either impossible or very dangerous, and the
induced error through use of an intermediate beaker was of lesser con-
sequence. In all cases where an intermediate beaker was used, it was used
exclusively at one point for the duration of sampling at the plant, and it
was repeatedly purged with fresh sample before each sample was collected.
SAMPLE POINTS
Sample points were selected to characterize both the Influent and effluent
stream toxic pollutant levels, toxic pollutants in sludge and, by combining
these data, toxic pollutant mass balances through the POTW-. Other sample
points were selected to best characterize wastewater and sludges at par-
ticular stages of treatment. At each plant, an effort was made to select
sample points in such a way that any extraneous factors that mignt affect
the validity of the sample would be eliminated. This involved selecting
sample points that allowed sample collection before settling, volatiliza-
tion, or contamination from other waste streams or recycle flows.
Table 2 lists all samples taken during the 20-plant program. In the
following paragraphs each sampling point type is briefly described.
Influent (Total) - Generally, total influent samples were collected prior
to pre-aeranon, grit removal, or recycle streams such as digester decant.
To avoid automatic sampler tube fouling where possible, influent samples
were collected downstream of bar screens. When access to the influent was
such that representative samples could not be taken via automatic samoling,
grab composite aliquots were collected every two hours. When a total
influent sample was not available prior to any interferences or because of
access problems or multiple influent streams, upstream samples of seoarate
flows were taken and manually composited to create a total influent sample.
17
73<
-------
oo
TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF NUMBER OF SAMPLES
TAKEN AT EACH PLANT
PLANT 1 THROUGH 10
SAHPLE LOCATION
INFLUENT (TOTAL)
SECONDARY EFFL. (UNCHLORINATEO)
SECONDARY EFFLUENT (CHLORINATED)
SECONDARY EFFLUENT (OTHER)
PRIHARY SLUDGE (RAW)
PRIMARY SLUDGE (THICKENED)
PRIHARY SLUDGE (DIGESTED)
COMBINED SLUDGE-RAU FROH PRIMARY
COHDINED SLUDGE (UNTREATED)
COMB, SLUDGE-SECONDARY THICKENED
COMBINED SLUDGE (BOTH THICKENED)
COMBINED SLUDGE (DIGESTED)
COMBINED SLUDGE (HEAT TREATED)
WASTE ACT, SLUDGE (UNTREATED)
WASTE ACT, SLUDGE-DAF THICKENED
W.A.S. (OTHER THICKENED)
SECONDARY SLUDGE (UNTREATED)
TAP WATER
HEAT TREATMENT DECANT
GRAVITY THICKENER OVERFLOW
VACUUM FILTER FILTRATE
FLOTABLES
COMBINATION OF SOURCES
1
28
3
7
7
2
7
7
7
-
3
12
4
4
-
4
6
_
6
-
3
6
_
6
_
A
6
_
6
A
a
4
4
3
4
4
10
6
A
6
4
TOTAL
SAMPLES
87
24
52
4
22
4
4
14
13
11
4
IB
10
14
1
2
4
3
10
1
1
7
2
TOTAL
320
-------
C/l
SAMPLE LOCATION
INFLUENT (TOTAL)
INFLUENT (OTHER)
PftlHARY EFFLUENT
SECONDARY EFFL. (UNCHLORINATED)
SECONDARY EFFLUENT (CHLOKINATEb)
SECONDARY EFFLUENT (OTHER)
TERTIARY EFFLUENT (CHLORINATE!')
PRIMARY SLUDOE (RAU>
PRIMARY SLUDOE
&
3
3
_
1
„
3
-
_
-
-
1
_
16
6
6
_
_
i
_
6
_
_
^
-
6
-
-
1
_
17
6
_
_
-
6
6
-
6
_
-
6
-
6
-
1
_
IB
&
-
.
t>
-
-
-
-
^
-
-
-
4
t
_
TOTAL
19 20 SAMPLES
66 60
18
6 »2
66 33
6 39
- - 6
6 IB
66 31
4
21
- 6
- - 6
66 42
6
1 - 6
2 2
TOTAL
312
-------
Influent (Other) - At three of the plants covered in this Interim Report,
additional influent points were sampled. At Plant 14 an additional set of
samples was taken on the industrial side influent. At Plant 15 an addi-
tional set of samples was taken at the City's second treatment plant
(domestic sewage only). Plant 16 plant had two treatment trains that were
both sampled independently. The same criteria were used in choosing the
Influent (Other) points as were applied to the Influent (lotal) points.
Primary Effluent - At two of the 20 POTW's, primary settling tank
overflows, prior to secondary treatment, were sampled. In both instances,
automatic samplers were set up in the channel between primary and secondary
treatment. The channels represented the well-mixed combined effluent flow
from all primary tanks.
Secondary Effluent (Unchlorinated) - At 11 of the 20 plants, samples were
collected prior to chlorine disinfection. This sample was collected either
at the secondary clarifier overflow or in the channel leading to the
chlorine contact chamber or discharge pipe. In the majority of plants the
next step in the treatment process was chlorine disinfection, but in some
plants additional treatment prior to disinfection was practiced. At other
plants the unchlorinated effluent was the last accessible sampling point
before final discharge.
Secondary Effluent (Chlorinated) - This sample point represents the
effluent from the chlorine contact chamber, prior to discharge to the
receiving water.
Secondary Effluent (Other) - Two of the 20 POTW's had two chlorinated
effluent discharge conduits; one each for separate activated sludge and
trickling filter processes. One of the points was considered secondary
effluent (chlorinated) and for clarity the other was labeled "Secondary
Effluent (Other)." Automatic samplers were used at both points.
Tertiary Effluent (Chlorinated) - Three of the plants covered in this
Interim Report utilized mixed media filtration as a tertiary treatment
step. At each of these plants an additional sample was taken after the
mixed media filters. In each case the wastewater was chlorinated after the
filters and prior to the accessible sample point.
Primary Sludge (Raw) - At each plant an attempt was made to sample the pri-
mary sludge as it was removed from the primary settling tanks, before any
further treatment. Samples of the sludge were always collected as grab
composites for two reasons: sludge consistency and lack of continuous
availability. The majority of these samples were taken from taps either on
the sludge pumps themselves or on the lines conveying the sludge to storage
or further treatment. Occasionally, the sludge point would be in a rising
well controlled by telescoping valves. The consistency of this sample
varied depending upon the means utilized by the respective plants for
drawing the sludge from the primary tanks. Samples were taken so as to
attempt to represent the average sludge consistency. This involved
20
76<
-------
collecting sludge grabs spaced over the- sampling day, or grab composites
spanning definite pumping periods.
Primary Sludge (Thickened) - At two of the plants the raw primary sludge
was not accessible, necessitating collection of prtmary sludge after gra-
vity thickening. Sampling procedures and techniques for this point were
the same as the sampling procedures for the raw primary sludge.
Primary Sludge (Digested) - At one plant the raw primary sludge was pumped
directly to digesters, with no accessible intermediate taps or valves for
sampling. Consequently, a sample of the digested primary sludge was taken.
This sample was collected from a pump tap as a manual grab composite.
Combined Sludge (Raw from Primary) - A number of plants recycle their
secondary siuoge directly back into the primary settling tanks. At these
plants a combined sludge sample was taken in the same manner described pre-
viously for primary sludge. These samples were composited directly from
the primary tanks, prior to any sludge conditioning.
Combined Sludge (Untreated) - At one of the 20 POTWs sludge from the pri-
mary tanks was not accessible and a sample of the sludge after it had com-
bined with the waste activated sludge was taken. At another plant a manual
flow composite sample of both primary and waste activated sludges was taken
and analyzed as a combined sample of the total waste sludge being removed
from the system.
Combined Sludge (Secondary Thickened) - This sample is the same as
"Combined Sluage - Untreated" except that the wasted secondary sludge had
already been thickened prior to combination with the primary sludge.
Combined Sludge (Both Thickened) - At the two plants where sludge from the
secondary settling tanks was not immediately accessible, samples were taken
after the sludge had been gravity thickened and combined with the thickened
primary sludge.
Combined Sludge (Digested) - At three of the plants covered in this report
tne secondary sluage by itself was not accessible prior to digestion, so
that a combined sludge sample after digestion was taken.
Combined Sludge (Heat Treated) - In an effort to explore the effects of the
heat treatment process on toxic pollutants in sludge treatment, sludge
samples from two heat treatment systems at POTW's covered in this study
were sampled.
Combined Sludge (Other) - At one plant which had two parallel treatment
trains, two separate primary settling tank sludges were sampled. At this
particular plant, the primary tank sludges included the waste secondary
sludges because the waste secondary sludges were recycled to the head of
the primary settling basin.
21
77<
-------
Waste Activated Sludge (Untreated) - Waste activated sludge (WAS) sample
points varied from plant to plant, depending on WAS stream accessibility.
At some plants, WAS was accessible in rising wells prior to sludge con-
ditioning. If the rising wells were sufficiently mixed, automatic samplers
were used to gather WAS samples. At plants without rising wells, or when
the well was not mixed, samples were taken from taps on the sludge pumps.
Often, however, there were no accessible sampling points on the WAS line.
In these cases, since WAS and return activated sludge are usually iden-
tical, samples were taken from the return sludge pumps or return sludge
lines.
Waste Activated Sludge (DAF Thickened) - At one plant covered in this
report, an additional sample of the waste activated sludge was taken after
it had been conditioned in a dissolved air notation system. This was a
single grab sample.
Waste Activated Sludge (Other Thickened) - At another POTW, two manually
collected composite samples were taken of the waste activated sludge after
centrifugation. The samples ..were taken from a tap on the pump conveying
the thickened sludge to the digesters.
Secondary Sludge (Untreated) - These samples represent the trickling filter
humus collected at two of the plants covered in this report. Manual com-
posite samples were taken at both plants because sludge consistency and
availability prevented using automatic sampling.
Nitrification Sludge - One of the 20 POTW's followed its activated sludge
process with nitrification. At this plant two grab samples of the waste
nitrification sludge were taken. These samples were taken directly from
the waste sludge pumps as single grab samples.
Heat Treatment Decant - At the two plants sampled that conditioned the
sludge by heat treatment, decant or supernatant samples from the heat
treated sludge holding tanks were manually composited to correspond to the
"Combined Sludge (Heat Treated)" samples taken from the same plant. At
Plant 7, these samples were taken from a sample tap on the side of the
decant tank (gravity flow), while at Plant 8 the decant samples were
grabbed from the sludge decant tank overflow weir.
Gravity Thickener Overflow - A single grab sample of the overflow from the
gravity thickener was .taken at Plant 3. The sample was taken directly from
the overflow weir.
Vacuum Filter Filtrate - A single grab sample of the filtrate from the
vacuum filter at Plant 1 was grabbed from the pressure line from the
filters. All fractions were filled as one grab sample via an intermediate
vessel.
Fleatables - Also at Plant 1, a complete set of samples of the skimmings
from the primary settling tanks was taken. Manual composite samples were
22
-------
gathered by dipping into the floating layer at the collection end of the
primary settling tanks.
Combination of Sources - At Plant 10, two manual composite samples of the
aerobic digester feed were taken. The sample was a combination of the
thickened waste activated sludge and the floatables. Manual samples were
taken at this point from a tap on the sludge feed pump.
Tap Water - Background samples of the domestic water as supplied to the
plants' service areas were taken at 9 of the 20 plants covered in this
report. Samples were taken at a frequently used sink within the plant pre-
mises. The tapwater was allowed to run for a period of time prior to
sample collection.
23
-------
V.
DATA
OVERALL POTW DATA
At the first 20 plants of the 40 plant study, 632 individual samples were
collected and analyzed for toxic pollutants. Combining data from all
liquid and sludge samples, in total, 103 toxic pollutants were measured at
least once at levels above their detection limits. The toxic pollutants
never found include acrolein, benzidine, hexachloroethane, hexach-
lorocyclopentadiene, nitrobenzene, several ethers, all nitrosoamines, endo-
sulfans and metabolites, endrin and metabolites, all but two PCB mixtures,
and toxaphene.
Tables 3 and 4 present occurrence data and concentration ranges for POTW
influent and secondary effluent samples. In influent samples across the
20-plant data base, 93 toxic pollutants were measured at least once above
their detection limits. Likewise, in secondary effluents, 84 toxic pollu-
tants were found at levels above their detection limits. Finally, of the
24 toxic pollutants found in more than 50 percent of the influent samples,
all were detected less frequently in effluent samples.
In all, 76 toxic pollutants were found in raw sludges. For the purposes of
this discussion, raw sludges include thickened sludges. Table 5 summarizes
the occurrence of these pollutants in sludges across the 20 POTW data base.
Twelve of the 15 most frequently occurring and most highly concentrated
toxic pollutants in raw sludge are metals.
Figures A-l to A-8 in Appendix A present cumulative distribution curves of
pollutant removal and effluent concentration for selected priority pollu-
tants. These curves are discussed in Section VI.
Tables B-l to B-60 in Appendix B present detailed data summaries for each
of the 20 POTW's. For each plant, a Summary of Analytical Data is included
which presents averages of each pollutant parameter found at each sample
point covered. A Mass Balance is also included for each POTW. In these
tables, the average pounds per day of each pollutant entering the POTW are
tabulated, as well as the daily pounds exiting the POTW. Finally, for each
POTW, a Summary of Percent Occurrence 1s presented that tabulates the per-
cent of times each pollutant was found at each sampling point at each
plant.
24
80<
-------
TABLE 3
OCCURRENCE OF PRIORITY POLLUTANTS
IN POTU INFLUENT SAMPLES
CD
h*
A
PARAMETER
ZINC
COPPER
CYANIDE
CHROMIUM
TOLUENE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROFORH
HETHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
BIS<2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
1»1r1-TRICHLOROETHANE
NICKEL
ETHYLBENZENE
SILVER
PHENOL
LEAD
CADMIUM
MERCURY
BENZENE
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
1P2-TRANS-HICHLOROETHYLENE
NAPHTHALENE
1 r1-DICH1QRQETHANE
1 r 1-MCHLOROETHYLENE
1
-DICIH OR06EN2ENE
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
ANTHRACENE
NUHBER OF PERCENT
SAMPLES OF TIMES
ANALYZED DETECTED UNITS MINIHUHU)
146
146
150
146
152
152
152
152
152
152
152
146
152
146
152
146
146
146
152
152
152
152
152
152
152
152
152
152
152
100
100
99
99
98
97
96
95
95
94
91
87
B6
84
63
79
71
70
68
63
62
59
58
55
40
35
30
27
27
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UG/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
NG/L
UO/L
UG/L
UO/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
23
34
3
8
2
2
1
1
1
2
1
11
1
2
1
16
1
200
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
HAXIHUH
7680
1190
2500
2380
500
1100
430
11000
860
390
1600
1930
448
77
380
935
1800
3900
1560
105
33
140
97
150
24
243
440
94
93
-------
TABLE 3 (CONT.)
OCCURRENCE OF PRIORITY POLLUTANTS
IN POTW INFLUENT SAMPLES
00
PARAMETER
PHENANTHRENE
GAMMA-BHC
1r 4-DICHLOROBENZENE
ARSENIC
ANTIMONY
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
METHYL CHLORIDE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
CHLOROBENZENE
1r 2-DICHLOROPROPANE
DICHLOROBROMOMETHANE
PYRENE
2r4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
FLUORANTHENE
DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
lr2-DICHLOROETHANE
SELENIUM
VINYL CHLORIDE
1F1p 2-TRICHLOROETHANE
PCB-1242
HEPTACHLOR
1r1r2r2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
FLUORENE
2»4»6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
ALPHA-BHC
1>2r4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
NUMBER OF PERCENT
SAMPLES OF TIMES
ANALYZED DETECTED UNITS MINIMUM! 1)
152
152
152
146
146
152
152
152
152
152
152
152
152
152
152
152
152
152
146
152
152
152
152
152
152
152
152
152
27
23
23
16
14
13
12
11
11
11
10
9
9
9
9
9
8
B
8
7
6
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
UO/L
NO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UG/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UG/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UG/L
UO/L
UO/L
NO/L
NG/L
UG/L
UO/L
UO/L
NO/L
UO/L
1
20
2
2
1
5
3
2
1
1
1
5
1
3
1
5
5
1
1
28
2
2300
80
3
5
1
50
3
MAXIMUM
93
500
200
00
192
18
270
1900
5
5
4
84
55
92
22
5
210
59
20
3900
135
49600
500
52
5
6
3000
32
-------
TABLE 3 (CONT.)
OCCURRENCE OF PRIORITY POLLUTANTS
IN POTW INFLUENT SAMPLES
CD
CO
/\
PARAMETER
PARACHLOROMETA CRESOL
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
2-CHLOROPHENOL
CHRYSENE
1F 2-BENZANTHRACENE
CHLORODIBROMOHETHANE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
METHYL BROMIDE
1t3-DICHLQROPROPYLENE
INDENO PYRENE
BERYLLIUM
IBOPHORONE
HEXACHLORGBENZENE
BENZO (A)PYRENE
ACENAPHTHENE
11,12-BENZOFLUORANTHENE
BIS<2-CIILOROETHYOXY> METHANE
lr!2-BENZOPERYLENE
lr2(5r6-DIBENZANTHRACENE
3,4-BENZOFLUORANTHENE
ALPRIN
PCB-1254
4.4'-DDD
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
DIELDRIN
2r«-DINITROTOLUENE
OHLOROETHANE
NUMBER OF
SAMPLES
ANALYZED
152
152
132
152
152
152
152
152
152
146
146
152
152
152
152
152
141
146
146
150
152
152
152
152
152
152
152
PERCENT
OF TIMES
DETECTED
5
5
5
4
4
4
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UG/L
UO/L
UG/L
UG/L
NG/L
NG/L
NG/L
NG/L
NG/L
UG/L
UG/L
MINIMUM(l)
1
1
1
5
5
1
45
18
4
5
1
5
1
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5000
3400
310
230
30
5
3
MAXIMUM
31
12
5
5
5
2
1000
130
8
5
4
18
20
10
5
5
5
35
5
5
5000
5500
770
500
40
8
5
-------
TABLE 3 (CONT.)
OCCURRENCE OF PRIORITY POLLUTANTS
IN POTW INFLUENT SAMPLES
00
£*
A
ro
oo
PARAMETER
THALLIUM
BETA-BHC
DELTA-BHC
1•2-DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE
2r4-DINITROPHENOL
ACENAPHTHYLENE
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
2r6-DINITROTOLUENE
BROHOFORH
NUMBER OF PERCENT
SAMPLES OF TIMES
ANALYZED DETECTED UNITS
146 UO/L
152
152
152
152
152
NO/L
NO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
152 1 UO/L
152 1 UO/L
152 1 UO/L
MINIMUM(l)
4
1000
500
10
7
5
5
5
1
MAXIMUM
A
1000
500
10
7
5
5
5
1
(1) MINIMUM OF VALUES ABOVE DETECTION LIMIT ONLY
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY-TO BE VERIFIED
-------
TABLE 4
OCCURRENCE OF PRIORITY POLLUTANTS
IN POTU SECONDARY EFFLUENT SAMPLES
00
CT
A
PARAMETER
ZINC
COPPER
CYANIDE
BIS<2-ETHYLHEXYL> PHTHALATE
HETHYLENE CHLORIDE
CHLOROFORM
CHROMIUM
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
NICKEL
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
1.1t1-TRICHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
CADMIUM
GAHMA-BHC
LEAD
MERCURY
SILVER
PHENOL
BENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
DICHLOROBROMOMETHANE
1,2-TRANS-DICHLOROETHYLENE
ANTIMONY
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
ARSENIC
NUMBER OF PERCENT
SAMPLES OF TIHE8
ANALYZED DETECTED UNITS MINIMUMU)
130
130
126
129
130
130
130
130
130
129
130
130
130
130
130
130
129
130
129
130
130
130
130
130
129
129
130
129
130
98
96
94
91
88
88
84
82
81
59
57
54
48
37
36
35
33
28
27
21
21
19
15
15
14
13
13
12
12
UG/L
UO/L
UG/L
UQ/L
UO/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
NG/L
UG/L
NG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
21
3
2
2
1
1
2
0
11
1
1
1
0
2
10
20
200
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
MAXIMUM
1200
243
2211
370
1570
61
178
320
579
92
370
97
1100
G2
840
217
1100
19
89
29
11
5
12
69
52
6
11
10
72
-------
TABLE 4 (COMT.)
OCCURRENCE OF PRIORITY POLLUTANTS
IN POTW SECONDARY EFFLUENT SAMPLES
00
O
A
PARAMETER
1f2-DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLORODIBROHOMETHANE
ALPHA-BHC
SELENIUM
METHYL CHLORIDE
ANTHRACENE
PHENANTHRENE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1t1-DICHLOROETHANE
1t4-DICHLOROBENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
NAPHTHALENE
i»3-DICHLOROBENZENE
2r4-DICHLOROPHENOL
BETA-BHC
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
PYRENE
CHRYSENE
1,2-BENZANTHRACENE
PCB-1242
BERYLLIUM
1F1»2r2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
CHLOROBENZENE
1r 2-DICHLOROPROPANE
ACENAPHTHENE
DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
FLUORANTHENE
NUMBER OF PERCENT
SAMPLES OF TIMES
ANALYZED DETECTED UNITS HINIMUH(i)
12?
130
130
130
130
129
129
130
130
129
130
130
129
129
129
130
130
129
129
129
130
130
130
130
130
120
129
129
129
9
0
e
e
7
6
6
5
5
5
5
5
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
UO/L
UO/L
NO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
NO/L
UO/L
UG/L
UO/L
UO/L
NO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
1
1
20
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
5
5
1
40
1
5
75<
5
5
5
HAXIMUM
27
5
740
103
440
32
32
200
3
9
47
14
5
5
3
70
e
5
5
5
2600
12
5
3
1
2
13
5
5
-------
TABLE 4 (CONT. )
OCCURRENCE OF PRIORITY POLLUTANTS
IN POTW SECONDARY EFFLUENT SAMPLES
00
PARAMETER
2-NITROPMENQL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENQL
PARACHLOROMETA CRESOL
2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
ALDRIN
It12-BENZOPERYLENE
4-NITROPHENOL
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
ISOPHORONE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
3r3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
FLUORENE
2,4-DINTTROTOLUENE
HETHYL BROMIDE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
INDENOU,2r3-CfD> PYRENE
lf2ISf6-DIBENZANTHRACENE
2-CHLOROPHENOL
4.6-DINITRO-O-CRESOL
HEPTACHLQR EPOXIDE
PCB-1254
4>4'-DDD
CIILORDANE
DIELDRIN
HEPTACHLOR
1r1f2-TRICMLOROETMANE
NUMBER OF PERCENT
SAMPLES OF TIMES
ANALYZED DETECTED UNITS MINIMUMU)
129 2 UO/L
129 2 UO/L
129 2 UO/L
129 2 UQ/L
130 2 NO/L
123 2 UO/L
129 2 UG/L
129 2 UO/L
129 2 UG/L
129 2 UO/L
129 2 UG/L
129 2 UO/L
129 2 UG/L
130 2 UG/L
130 2 UG/L
123
123
129
129
130
130
130
130
130
130
UG/L
UO/L
UO/L
UG/L
NG/L
NG/L
NG/L
NG/L
NG/L
NG/L
130 1 UG/L
3
2
1
1
1000
4
S
7
S
5
S
1
1
37
58
5
5
S
2
500
500
230
200
40
30
6
MAXIMUM
5
5
4
1
5000
4
100
10
12
5
5
5
2
190
58
5
5
5
2
500
500
230
200
40
30
&
(l)MINIMUM OF VALUES ABOVE DETECTION LIMIT ONLY
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY-TO BE VERIFIED
TWO SECONDARY EFFLUENTS INCLUDED FOR PLANTS 10 AND 17
-------
TABLE 5
OCCURRENCE OF PRIORITY POLLUTANTS
IN POTH RAW SLUDGE SAMPLES
00
00
A
PARAMETER
CYANIDE
COPPER
ZINC
CADMIUM
SILVER
CHROMIUM
NICKEL
TOLUENE
LEAD
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
ARSENIC
ANTIMONY
SELENIUM
MERCURY
ETHYLBENZENE
BENZENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
1f2-TRANS-DICHLOROETHYLENE
ANTHRACENE
PHENANTHRENE
PHENOL
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
PYRENE
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
1*1-DICHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
FLUORANTHENE
NAPHTHALENE
BERYLLIUM
NUMBER OF PERCENT
SAMPLES OF TIMES
ANALYZED DETECTED UNITS MINIMUM(l)
200
200
201
200
200
200
200
203
201
203
202
193
194
199
205
205
205
205
203
203
203
201
203
203
203
205
205
203
203
202
98
98
98
98
97
96
95
95
95
95
94
89
80
78
73
69
63
62
53
53
52
50
46
45
42
42
37
34
33
32
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UG/L
UO/L
UG/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
NO/L
UO/L
UG/L
UO/L
UG/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UG/L
UO/L
UG/L
UO/L
UG/L
UO/L
UO/L
UG/L
UG/L
60
100
410
12
15
110
12
1
80
20
5
3
5
110
1
1
1
1
6
6
19
1
6
14
4
1
1
8
11
2
MAXIMUM
245000
180000
1100000
95000
6450
160000
84000
42300
170000
35000
6000
200O
140000
690000
4200
694
3308
96000
3200
3200
17000
4690
1700
1600
45000
2885
2800
1200
5200
65
-------
TABLE 5 (CONT. )
OCCURRENCE OF PRIORITY POLLUTANTS
IN POTU RAW SLUDGE SAMPLES
OD
CJ
CJ
PARAMETER
1 r 2-BENZANTHRACENE
CHRY8ENE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1»1•1-TRICHLOROE THANE
1f1»2t2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
CHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROFORM
THALLIUM
1» 2-DICHLOROPRQPANE
lr4-DICHLOROBENZENE
DICHLOROBROMOMETHANE
li2~DICHLOROBENZENE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYL CHLORIDE
1r2>4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
1r3-DICHLOROBENZENE
FLUORENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
3r4-B£NZOFLUORANTHENE
1r 1-DICHLOROETIIYLENE
METHYL BROMIDE
CHLORODIBROMOMETHANE
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
ACENAPHTIIENE
DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
NUMBER OF PERCENT
SAMPLES OF TIHES
ANALYZED DETECTED UNITS MINIHUMU)
203
202
204
205
203
205
205
200
204
203
205
203
205
205
205
203
203
205
203
203
203
203
205
200
204
203
205
203
203
26
25
19
18
1<4
15
15
14
13
12
12
10
10
9
9
8
8
8
7
7
7
6
5
5
5
4
4
3
3
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UG/L
UO/L
UO/L
U6/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UG/L
9
9
8
34
7
20
2
5
10
38
10
7
38
31
27
2
1
33
10
14
5
6
37
MAXIMUM
1500
1500
42000
1900
1044
290
40
31
103
12000
260
1319
113
71000
6100
950
6000
4300
1900
1300
786
2400
14000
30000
75
298
940
4600
1024
-------
TABLE 5 (CONT.)
OCCURRENCE OF PRIORITY POLLUTANTS
IN POTW RAW SLUDGE SAMPLES
o
A
PARAMETER
2-CHLOROPHENOL
lrlr2-TRICHLOROETHANE
11F12-BENZOFLUORANTHENE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
ACRYLONITRILE
lr2-DICHLOROETHANE
BENZO (A)PYRENE
2 F 4 F 6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
1»12-BENZOPERYLENE
1F215r6-DIBENZANTHRACENE
INDENO(l»2f3-C»D) PYRENE
4.4'-DDE
1F 3-DICHLOROPROPYLENE
NUMBER OF PERCENT
SAMPLES OF TIMES
ANALYZED DETECTED UNITS
203
203
204
203
203
205
205
203
203
203
203
203
203
203
203
205
205
3
3
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
-------
VI.
EVALUATION OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS
IMPACT OF INDUSTRIAL CONTRIBUTION ON INFLUENT QUALITY
The amount of Industrial discharge to the 20 POTW's ranged from less than 5
percent to a maximum of 50 percent of their average flow (see Table 1).
Review of the influent priority pollutant data reveals that, 1n general,
the higher the industrial contribution, the greater the concentration and
to a lesser extent the greater the occurrence of priority pollutants in
POTW Influents. Figure 1 1s a plot of the sum of influent priority pollu-
tant metal concentrations versus percent industrial contribution. Although
there is a fair amount of data point scatter, the least squares fit has a
large positive slope (R=0.491, slope - 72.86 ug/1/%). This indicates a
tendency for total metals concentrations to increase when percent
industrial flow increases. The fits were not as good for the sums of other
priority pollution fraction sums (organics, volatiles, base-neutrals,
acids). This may be because a straight line does not describe the data or
because of inaccuracies in the percent industrial figures.
TREATMENT OR REMOVAL OF PRIORITY POLLUTANTS IN POTW's
In the Appendix, Figures A-l to A-8 present cumulative distributions for
the percent removal and effluent concentrations for the 24 priority pollu-
tants most prominent in POTW influents. Table 6 summarizes the data pre-
sented in Appendix A for pollutants where 10 or more usable data points are
available. In Table 6 and Appendix A, percent removals are presented for
two subgroups of analytical data: removals when the priority pollutant
level in the influent was measured at a plant average level greater than
zero, and removals when the plant average influent pollutant concentration
was always measured above 10 ug/1. In Table 6, the number of data points
for each subgroup is indicated by N. Minimum percent removals and effluent
levels can be read directly from Appendix A figures for any desired percent
of POTW's in the data base.
Table 6 shows that, when present at any measurable level, 50 percent of the
POTW's samples achieved minimum priority pollutant metal removals ranging
roughly between 32 and 81 percent. For common organic priority pollutants,
50 percent of the POTW's achieved minimum removal between 53 and 90 per-
cent.
Figure 2 presents cumulative distributions for the three major priority
pollutant fractions. These curves summarize the data presented in Appendix
A and in Table 6. In Figure 2, all less-than values were averaged as zero
35
91-
-------
FIGURE 1
CORRELATION OF INFLUENT TOTAL METALS
CONCENTRATION TO PERCENT INDUSTRIAL FLOW
10000
I I
I I I
8000
6000
o
I
4)
O
O
4000
2000
10
20 30
Industrial Flow
4 0
5 0
36
-------
TABLE 6
SUMMARY OF PERCENT REMOVALS ACHIEVED BY SECONDARY TREATMENT
CO
CJ
A
Influents > 0 Mg/l
Percent of
50
75
Plants
80
90
Influents
2 10 Mg/l
Percent Removal
N
20
20
20
20
20
18
19
20
20
20
20
20
19
20
20
18
17
19
20
20
91
91
82
77
71
85
81
54
53
80
90
85
71
81
53
52
55
32
71
78
83
87
76
46
62
82
70
31
33
50
67
71
67
68
0
0
0
17
50
66
83
84
71
45
61
69
50
27
33
25
57
50
64
64
0
0
0
9
43
65
79
74
62
40
59
38
0
0
0
0
25
0
44
59
0
0
0
0
0
55
Median
91
92
83
77
71
86
61
55
53
82
92
86
73
82
54
53
55
32
73
80
N
20
20
20
20
20
16
12
16
18
15
17
16
19
20
20
18
17
18
10
20
Median
91
92
83
77
71
88
89
55
60
86
94
90
75
82
54
55
55
32
81
80
Parameter
BOO
TSS
COD
Total Phenols
TOC
1,1,1 Trtchloroethane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Bis (2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
Trichloroethylene
Chromium
Copper
Cyanide
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Silver
Zinc
Notes: Plant averages used as basis for percent removal calculation.
N - Number of ddta points Included.
Values reported below their detection limit were averaged as 0 In Influents,
and as the detection limit In effluents.
-------
FIGURE 2
CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION CURVES
ACID BASE / NEUTRALS VOLATILES
1OOn , 1OO
METALS
CO
CD
5O 1OO
SO
100
so
o *. * * ' * * * * * *
100 o
so 100
,-. 1OO
A
o
V
at
SO
eg
«t 5 o
UJO V
100
so
too
50
O SO 1OO O SO 1OO O
% of Plants
so 100
Notes: A11 less than values averaged as 0.
-------
to avoid attaching significance to pollutants that were not present in
either the Influent or effluent samples. This procedure will slightly
overstate removal of pollutants measured near their detection Unrit, but
these cases have minimal Impact on the totals presented 1n Figure 2.
REDUCTION OF PRIORITY POLLUTANTS BY POTU TREATMENT PROCESSES
Table 7 summarizes the average of the individual POTW percent removals for
selected conventional and priority pollutants achieved by the major treat-
ment processes. For pure oxygen activated sludge, one plant's data are
included. Primary and tertiary effluents were sampled at two plants while
twelve activated sludge processes and three trickling filter processes were
evaluated.
Table 7 shows that among the treatment processes examined, tertiary treat-
ment removed 16 of 24 priority pollutants better than either trickling
filter or activated sludge processes. For pure oxygen activated sludge
processes, less than half of the removals (10 of 24) were higher than
either trickling filter or activated sludge removals. Three-quarters of
the trickling filter removals (18 of 24) were better than the corresponding
activated sludge removals. Primary treatment appears to be generally less
effective than secondary treatment processes in removing the 24 selected
priority pollutants.
At two of the POTW's (10 and 17), parallel activated sludge and trickling
filter plants treated common influent streams. At both plants, the
effluent streams were completely separate allowing for a true comparison of
removal efficiencies. The trickling filter and activated sludge conven-
tional pollutant removals were all within six percentage points of each
other. For the 32 priority pollutants measured in the influents, 13 were
treated to the same degree by both processes, 8 priority pollutants were
better removed by activated sludge, 11 were better removed by the trickling
filter process. The only priority pollutants that had large differences
between trickling filter and activated sludge removals were tetrach-
loroethylene (trickling filter 13 points higher) and chromium (activated
sludge 34 points higher).
PQTW PRIORITY POLLUTANT MASS BALANCES
As described in Section V, mass balances for each conventional, nonconven-
tional, and priority pollutant are included in Appendix A, In these mass
balance tables, pollutants biodegraded or otherwise treated should show a
lower mass exiting the plant than entering it. For conservative pollu-
tants, such as metals, which cannot be degraded, but only transferred to
sludge streams, in theory the mass balances should show the same pounds
into the plant as leaving it. Table 8 summarizes the mass balance for five
POTW's where the percent difference between total pounds of total metals in
the incoming and outgoing streams were within ten percent. At these five
plants, it is assumed that the balances for all other pollutants arg
equally accurate.
95 <
-------
Fraction
Conventional*
Organlei
0-3
/\
Metals
TABLE 7
REDUCTION OF CONVENTIONAL AND PRIORITY POLLUTANTS BY POTW TREATMENT PROCESSES
Percent Removal
Parameter
BOD
Total Suspended Solids
COD
011 and Grease
Benzene
1,1,1 - Trlchloroethane
Chloroform
1,2 - Trans-Dlchloroothylene
Ethyl benzene
Methyl one Chloride
Tetrachloroethyl ene
Toluene
TrIchloroethylene
Phenol
Naphthalene
Bis (2-Etnylhexyl) Phtholate
Butyl Benzyl Phthai ate
DI-N-Butyl Phthlate
Dlethyl Phthlate
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Cyanide
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Silver
Zinc
Pr Imary
Treatment(l)
17
39
13
52
23
47
23
66
25
14
-
-
30
55
0
-
36
99*
II
_
0
24
57
-
-
-
17
27
Trickling
Fllter(2)
93
94
62
69
96
92
60
98
92
47
78
87
96
96
99+
54
97
0
96
74
74
89
81
94
99+
25
95
80
Activated
SludgeO)
95
94
90
89
95
87
79
57
92
77
82
71
89
13
28
78
48
31
10
92
91
90
71
74
54
60
83
86
Activated
SludgeM)
90
88
80
90
99+
38
It
99+
80
27
-
96
44
99+
99+
40
99+
99+
99+
99+
76
84
53
99+
86
18
99+
83
Tertiary
TreatroentCS)
95
98
91
71
99+
99
25
99+
98
92
98
99
99
99
-
60
99+
64
99+
99+
87
88
-
97
86
51
99+
87
(I) Two Plant data base
(2) Three Plant data base
(3) Seventeen plant data base
(4) One plant data base
(5) Three plant data base
-------
TABLE 8
Mass Balance Summary
(Pounds/Day)
Metals
Total Organic;
Volatlles
Base Neutrals
Process
s
-01
A
Plant No. In
2 35.9
5 97.2
7 649
£ II 510.2
20 936.8
Out
32.6
91.5
610.2
549.1
917.6
I
-9
-6
-6
+8
-2
In
6.6
176.3
155.4
185.3
320.1
Percent
Out Difference In
4.9
103.2
80.2
45.3
80.8
-26
-41
-48
-76
-75
3.2
168.9
64.6
159.3
263.2
Percent
Out Difference
2.3
95
23.2
19.6
45.1
-28
-44
-64
-88
-83
is.
3.4
7.4
90.8
26
56.9
Percent
Out Difference
2.6 -24
8.2
57
25.7
35.7
til
-37
-1
-37
Activated Sludge
Activated Sludge
Activated Sludge
Trickling Filter
Activated Sludge
-------
Table 8 shows that total priority pollutant metals mass deficiencies ranged
between a gain of eight percent and a loss of nine percent, while total
organics were always lost. For total organic priority pollutants, losses
ranged between 26 and 76 percent.
For the total volatile priority pollutants, mass was always lost. For the
volatiles, percent loses ranged between 28 and 88 percent. For the base-
neutral priority pollutants, mass balance differences ranges between a gain
of 11 percent and a 37 percent loss. At each plant, more organics were
lost than metals and more volatiles were lost than either total organics or
base-neutrals.
The results discussed above support the concept that metals are conser-
vative in a treatment process while organics are either biodegraded or
otherwise lost. The greater loss of volatiles compared to total organics
or base-neutrals also supports the idea that volatiles may be stripped out
of the wastewater during aeration in addition to being biodegraded.
DAILY VARIATION OF INFLUENT POLLUTANT CONCENTRATIONS
Table 9 presents the daily average concentration of selected conventional
and nonconventional pollutants and the sum of the toxic pollutant analyti-
cal fraction concentrations in influent samples. With the exception of
Sundays, at least one 24-hour composite influent sample was taken on each
day of the week at each POTW, providing a minimum of 20 data points to make
up the average for each parameter. Less than ten Sunday samples were taken
and these were mostly 8-hour composites at Plant 1.
Table 9 does not reveal any particular concentration trend among the five
working days. None of the five days of the week showed a consistently
higher or lower concentration. However, for every toxic pollutant fraction
(except pesticides) as well as BOD and COD, the Friday and Monday averages
were always higher thair the Saturday or Sunday average. The Sunday data
should be viewed cautiously because of the abbreviated data base it repre-
sents. Comparing averages for the five working days with the weekend
levels, in each case the work week average was higher than any Saturday or
Sunday average.
EFFECT OF RAINFALL
During the week of sampling at five of the 20 POTW's, at least one day of
heavy rainfall occurred. Table 10 presents the influent total priority
pollutant metals loadings at these plants before and after the rainfall day
and the average of all other days' loadings. Three of these five plants
have combined sewers, one has separate sewers, one is half combined and
half separate. At Plants 4, 6 and 14, it was raining on the first day of
sampling; at the other two plants, at least one day of dry weather sampling
was completed before rainfall began.
42
98<
-------
TABLE 9
DAILY AVERAGE CONCENTRATIONS
OF POLLUTANTS IN POTW INFLUENTS
f rt
w
tO *>
A "
Fraction
BOD (ng/l)
COO <«g/l)
Phenols, Total (yg/l)
Volatile* (,ig/l)
Base Neutrals (jig/I)
Acids (|ig/l)
Toxic Metals (yg/l)
Pesticides (ng/l)
H
193
447
94
536
98
30
1646
424
T
196
523
77
598
57
20
1778
2171
W
206
401
80
1047
90
10
1835
2178
Th
204
575
108
450
74
18
(882
2743
f_
182
546
216
401
72
24
1819
330
Sa
150
362
64
243
65
14
1123
1344
Su
121
250
55
36^
49
7
520
0
W-F
Average
196
496
IIS
606
78
20
1792
1569
-------
TABLE 10
EFFECT OF RAINFALL
ON INFLUENT METALS LOADING
Inf1uent Pounds of Total Metals
PLANT NO.
4
6
9
14
18
SEWER
TYPE
50% Combined
Separate
Combined
Combined
Combined
DAY OF
HEAVY
RAINFALL
1287
354
197
171
825
DAY AFTER
HEAVY
RAINFALL
402
336
101
125
250
AVERAGE
OF ALL
OTHER DAYS
391
547
231
151
271
44
100<
-------
Table 10 shows that at each plant with combined sewers the loading on the
day of heavy rainfall was significantly higher than the loading on the
following day. At the one POTW with separate sewers, the loading on the
day after rainfall was only marginally lower. Table 10 also presents the
average of influent total metals loadings. For three of the four combined
sewer plants, this loading was lower than the heavy rainfall day's loading.
At Plant 6, which has separate sewers, the average of other days was con-
siderably higher-
FORMATION OF CHLORINATED HYDROCARBONS
Table 11 presents a summary of occurrences where the secondary or tertiary
chlorinated effluent had a higher concentration of a chlorinated hydrocar-
bon than the corresponding prechloMnated secondary effluent.
Inconsequential data points were excluded from consideration by specifying
that the post chlorinated sample had to exceed the prechlorinated sample's
detection limit. Most of the pollutants in Table 11 with less than ten
reported occurrences of higher chlorinated hydrocarbon levels can be
explained by some normal degree of variation between concentrations within
the same order of magnitude. Control tests run on some frequently
occurring nonchlorinated compounds also indicated several instances of con-
centration increase through chlorination.
For chloroform, there were 28 instances where it increased in concentration
through the chlorination process. The average prechlorinated concentration
was 5 ug/1 for these occurrences, and the average chlorinated effluent was
14 ug/1. For dlchlorobromomethane, there were 16 instances where it
increased (from 2 ug/1 to 9 ug/1, average). Methylene chloride, gamnia-3CH,
and chlorodibromomethane also increased more often than can be explained by
random variation.
POLLUTANTS DETECTED IN SLUDGES WHEN NOT MEASURED IN THE INFLUENT
Table 12 presents a summary of the priority pollutants that were detected
in one or more sludge streams but were not detected in the corresponding
influent sample. In many cases this occurs because the influent con-
centrations were too low to be measured, but the pollutant may have con-
centrated sufficiently in the sludge stream to be quantified. For examole,
arsenic and antimony were both detected in less than 20 percent of all POTW
influent samples. However, both were detected consistently in sludge
streams. Arsenic was detected 56 times in a primary sludge at an average
concentration of 397 ug/l when it was not detected in the influent. It was
also detected 39 times 1n combined sludges (85 ug/l average) and 60 times
in secondary sludges (331 ug/1) under the same conditions.
45
-------
TABLE 11
FORMATION OF CHLORINATED HYDROCARBONS
DURING CHLORINE DISINFECTION
Parameter
1,1,1, Trichloroethane
Chloroform
1,1, Dichloroethylene
Methylene Chloride
Methyl Chloride
Dichlorobromomethane
Chlorodibromomethane
Tetrachloroethylene
Trichloroethylene
Aldrin (ng/1)
Gamma-BHC (ng/1)
Number of Occurrences
3
28
3
15
2
16
10
9
5
5
11
Prechlorinated
Effluent
Average^)
27
5
1
28
195
2
1
9
7
1200
53
Chlorinated
Effluent
Average^)
33
14
3
45
390
9
10
13
12
4400
109
(1) All units ug/1 unless otherwise noted.
46
102<
-------
TABLE 12
SUMMARY OF PRIORITY POLLUTANT KCURRENCE
IN SLUDGE WHEN NOT DETECTED IN INFLUENT
Pollutant
Arsenic
Antimony
Selenium
Pyrene
Anthracene/Phenanthrene
Benzo anthracene/chrysene
Fluoranthene
Beryl!ium
Cadmium
Benzene
1,2-trans Olchloroethylene
D1-n-butyl Phthalate
Vinyl Chloride
Butyl Benzyl Phthalate
Chlorobenzene
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,2-01chloropropane
Mercury
Lead
Naphthalene
Ethyl benzene
Nickel
Chloroethane
Methyl Chloride
Oi chlorofluoromethane
No. of Times
Detected in any
Sludge
!
ie
»
Stream(l)
94
91
91
73
72
52
52
47
39
38
38
34
31
29
29
25
25
24
22
22
21
19
19
16
15
Avg. Cone.
In Primary
Sludge(l)
397 (56)
221 (53)
123 (47)
190 (31)
350 (33)
388 (20)
152 (21)
22 (22)
425 (26)
9 (25)
504 (30)
354 (21)
2120 (17)
1260 (15)
13 (9)
467 (12)
9 (7)
93 (13)
12100 (9)
259 (9)
180 (13)
4960 (13)
12400 (8)
287 (6)
775 (6)
Avg. Cone.
In Combined
Sludge(l)
85 (39)
42 (31)
43 (26)
60 (13)
1590 (7)
39 (5)
48 (10)
9 (8)
95 (26)
2 (14)
37 (11)
88 (6)
260 (7)
487 (4)
6 (6)
8 (10)
(0)
31 (18)
1700 (13)
313 (3)
4 (5)
1740 (9)
2060 (2)
15 (2)
46 (6)
Avg. Cone.
In Secondary
Sludged)
331 (60)
303 (59)
1340 (57)
180 (45)
411 (40)
177 (30)
140 (34)
15 (43)
436 (17)
79 (18)
706 (11)
555 (14)
1820 (9)
804 (11)
81 (20)
37 (10)
31 (18)
135 (13)
8630 (15)
755 (11)
337 (12)
4440 (9)
1490 (12)
98 (10)
633 (6)
Note: All concentrations are in ug/1.
Values in parentheses are the- number of such occurrences,
(1) When not detected in influent.
47
103 <
-------
The pollutants in Table 12 include metals, volatile and base neutral
priority pollutants. Those with the highest concentration in the primary
sludge when not found in the influent were chloroethane, lead, nickel,
vinyl chloride, and butyl-benzyl phthalate. These five pollutants and
selenium also had the highest average concentration in secondary sludges.
The same five pollutants plus naphthalene and anthracene/phenanthrene were
also the highest in combined sludge streams.
CORRELATION OF INFLUENT AND EFFLUENT CONCENTRATIONS
For all of the priority pollutants that occurred in over 50 percent of the
influent samples, the correlation between plant average influent con-
centration and effluent concentration was tested. Table 13 presents the
results for metal and volatile priority pollutants. For the acid and base-
neutral fractions, no meaningful correlations were calculated. This is
probably because the individual pollutants in these fractions were present
at very low levels; frequently below or near their detection limits. Only
bis-2-ethylhexyl phthalate had an average influent concentration of over 20
ug/1. Its regression coefficient was 0.581 with a slope 0.325 and an
intercept of 8.5. For several other parameters the correlations were
excellent, and on average they were good, considering the data base inclu-
des only 20 plants.
For all metals except mercury, the slope of the line computed by the least
squares fit was between 0.04 and 0.52, indicating that half or more of an
incremental increase in influent concentration would be removed.
Interestingly, the highest slope was obtained for nickel, which also had
the lowest median removal of the common heavy metals (see Table 6).
The volatile priority pollutants exhibited the same general tendencies as
the metals. Correlation coefficients ranged between 0.262 and 0.937. The
slopes of the best fit line ranged between 0.03 and 0.8.
Based on the data in Table 13, it is reasonable to conclude that for many
priority pollutants an increase in the influent concentration will result
in an increase in effluent concentration.
48
104<
-------
TABLE 13
CORRELATION OF INFLUENT AND EFFLUENT CONCENTRATION
Correlation
Coefficient
Metals (R)
Cadmium
Nickel
Zinc
Copper
Cyanide
Chromium
Lead
Si 1 ver
Mercury
Volatiles
Tetrachloroethylene
Trichloroethylene
Chi oroform
Trichloroethane
Toluene
Dichloroethylene
Methyl ene Chloride
Ethyl benzene
0.995
0.915
0.834
0.657
0.633
0,573
0.509
0.204
-0.13
0.937
0.891
0.886
0.778
0.749
0.616
0.324
0.262
Slope of
Best Fit
Line
0.058
0.515
0.105
0.074
0.225
0.040
0.175
0.048
-0.062
0.317
0.099
0.529
0. 157
0.804
0.148
0.072
0.033
Intercept
2.7
16.2
52.1
17.3
113
22.3
24.9
2.46
459
-3.91
2.23
0.64
0.27
-20.5
2.23
33.4
1.88
49
-------
FIGURE A-1
Benzene
1,1.1,- Trichloroethane
Chloroform
h^
O
A
.en
o
A\
!
100
°'| I I I M I I I
0 20 40 60 80 100
0.
When two curves are presented, dashed line - Plants with influent average
concentration >10.
MINIMI
0 20 40 60 80 100
30 _ .,
o
c
r~
•-«
3
O >
t/> ~o
—I m
70 z
»-. o
CO l-i
o
ya
III I I
0 20 40 60 80 100
-------
FIGURE A 2
1.2 Trans Diclilofoulliylene
H-
S5
A
I
en
Elhylbonzene
0 20 40 60 80 100
I I I I I I I I '|
0 20 40 60 BO 100
0 20 40 60 80 100
I I I I I I I I I
20 40 60 80 100
100
Meihylene Chloride
Mil 11 I i 0
0 20 40 60 80 100
0 20 40 60 80 100
% of Plants
Nolus: Nunibur adjacent to cuivo represents mmibor of dula points includud.
Solid line - Plants with influuitt avoraye concenlralions>0.
Mfhon two curv/us iiio prusentud, dashed line - Plants with influunl average
concentration > 10.
-------
Tetrachloroethylene
I I I I I I I I I
0 20 40 60 80 100
100
FIGURE A-3
toluene
I I I I I I I I I
Trichloroelhylene
20 40 60 80 100
11111)111
0 20 40 60 80 100
en
to
G
00
A
a
3 3
£ S
Notes:
160
•
120 -
90 -
60 -
30 .
0 "
0
V0
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 '
20 40 60 80 10
300
240
180-f
120--
100 I
0
0
20
I I I I I I III'
20 40 60 80 100
% of Plants
Number adjacent to curve represents number of data points included.
Solid line - Plants with influent average concentrations>0.
When two curves are presented, dashed line - Plants with influent
average concentration >10.
11 rrrrm=
20 40 60 80 100
-------
FIGURE A 4
Phenol
Bis(2 Elhylhexyl) Phthalate
Naphthalene
o
o
A
g
i
0)
a.
0)
u
g
O
20 40 60 BO 100
100
80
60
40
20
0
- - \-A 9
I I I iT I I 14
0 20 40 60 80 100
I M M M i
0 20 40 60 80 100
40 60 BO 100
% of Plants
Notes: Number adjacent to curve represents number of data points included.
Sol nl 11 no - PUnls will) influent avtiruge concunlralions>0.
Wliun two cuivut> uiti piubunitjcl, (Jdbhod line - Plants with influent average
conctintralion >10.
10
8 •+-
6
4
2 _ .
0
I ) I M I I I
40 60 80 100
I M i I M I I
0 20 40 60 flO 100
-------
FIGURE A 5
Butyl Benzyl Phthalate
Di-N-Butyl Phlhalate
Dielhyl Phthalale
6
(1111)111
0 20 40 60 80 100
0 ' I I Oil fM I
0 20 40 60 80 100
20 40 60 80 100
O
A
m
g
I
I I I I I I I I I
0 20 40 60 80 100
30 •+
20 40 60 80 100
i I I I I I I I I
20 40 60 80 100
% of Plants
Notes: Number adjacent to curve represents number of data points Included.
Solid line - Plants with influent average concentrations'^.
When two curves are presented, dashed line - Plants With influent average
concentration > 10.
-------
. s
c c
0) 0)
- g
£ o
ui (j
Cadmium
II II II Mi
0 20 40 60 80 100
100
80--
60-
404
20
0
16
I I I I I I I I I
0 20 40 60 80 100
FIGURE A 6
Chromium
100
0'MINIMI
20 40 60 80 100
20 - -
60 80 100
% of Plunls
Notes: Numbur adjacent (o curve represents number of data points included.
Solid line - Plants with influent averaoe concentrations > 0.
When two curves are presented, dashed line - Plants with influent
average concentiation'MO.
Copper
100
o' 11 l I II I I I
0 20 40 60 80 100
20
0 20 40 60 80 100
-------
FIGURE A-7
Cyanide
Lead
I
I I I I I I I I I
0 20 40 60 80 100
100
I 1 M M I) I
Mercury
0 20 40 60 80
I I I I I I M I
20 40 60 80 100
fO
A
en
CM
ft
M
c
o
1000
0 'MINI
0 20 40 60 80 100
20
0 20 40 60 80 100
% of Plants
Notes:
Number adjacent to curve represents number of data points included.
Solid line - Plants with influent average concentrations>0.
When two curves are presented, dashed line - Plants with influent average
concentration x-10.
I I I I I I I I I
20 40 60 80 100
-------
FIGURE A 8
Nickel
Silver
Zinc
g
A
!
0)
I
A
-
£ <§
i I I I I I i I
0 20 40 60 80 100
0 20 40 60 80 100
100
Mini M
0 20 40 60 80 100
I I I I I I I I I
0 20 40 60 80 100
Notes:
% of Plants
Number adjacent lo curve represents number of data points included.
Solid line - Planls willi inllnonl uvuiuue concenlrtillons >0.
When two curves uie presunlud, dashud lino - Plants with influent average
concent) alien ^"10.
100
I I I I M I I I
0 20 40 60 80 100
20 40 60 80 100
-------
SUHCAhY UF ANALYTICAL LAIA
1
FRACTION PARAMETER
CONV. BOO
TOTAL SUSP. SOLIDS
COD
OIL C GRtASE
NUN-CDNV, TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS
TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDS
TOTAL VOL. SUS. SOLIDS
AMMONIA NITROGEN
TUC
VOLATILES ACRYLUNITRILE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLURItE
CHLOROBEN2ENE
,2-DICHLORUETHANE
,1,1-TRICHLOROETMAIJE
,1-OICHLOROETHANE
, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
HLOROFORH
,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE
,2-TiUNS-DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,2-01CHLOROPRUPANE
ETHYLBEN2ENE
METMYLENE CHLORIDE
METHYL CHLORIDE
BROHOFORH
01CHLOROBROMOHE T HANE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOR0010ROMOHETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TULUENE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
ACiOS. 2,4.6-TRlCHLOROPIIENOL
PARACMLOROMETA CRESOL
2-CHLOROPHENOL
2t4-OIMETHYLPH£NOL
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENOL
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED HERE NEVER DETECTED
L-LESS THAN! N-D NOT OLTECTEDI
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY TO BE VERIFIED
UMIS IKFLUtM
MG/L
HG/L
Ht/L
MG/L
UG/L
MG/l
MG/L
MG/L
MC/L
HG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
Ut/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
215
175
4i3
50
ISO
937
2S>2
113
7
2li>
L 100
1*3
1
1
0
IB
1
5
46
4
6
0
2b
12
0
0
0
0
0
51
21
2t
0
0
I 50
I 50
1
16
L
L
I
L
L
I
I
L
L
L
t
L
SllUNCiAKY PCNT
tf-fLULNI REM.
13
20
66
5
13
634
262
14
5
(,!>
100
3
5
5
5
3
5
5
19
4
1
5
4
6
5
5
1
0
5
5
4
4
50
50
1
1
i
21
94
09
BU
L SO
L 50
L 50
112
6B
L
L
L
L
L
L
I
L
I
L
L
L
L
L
1900
3255
7biO
Ibb56
M2
11057
9U5
2962
6
2250
2
42
7
5
5
2
5
5
5
5
4
5
51
243
5
5
61
5
25
72
79
23
50
50
50
50
230
7
OJ
rn
(/>
C
-------
SUMMARY Uf ANALYTICAL UUA
FRACTION CAKAMEItK
UASt-NlUI. ACtNAPHTHtNE
1.2,4-TRlCMLOROBENJ£N£
HEXACHLORUUEN2ENE
1.2-OICHLORUBEN/ENL
1 ,3-GICHLORUtiENUlJt
1,4-OICHLOftOBENZENE
3,3<-OICHLOROBEN2IDlNE
FLUQRANIHENE;
B1S<2-CHLOKOEIHYOXYI ME I HAKE
HEXACHLOKOBUIA01ENE
NAPHTHALENE
0IS(2-EIHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
BUTYL BEN2YL PHTHALATE
OI-M-Btmi PHTHALATE
OI-H-GCm PHIHALAU'
OUIHYL PIIIHALATE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
1.2-BtNJANTHKACENE
BENid (AIPYKENE
3.4-BENZOfLUORANTHLNE
ClIKYSENE
ACENAPHIHYLENE
ANTHRACENE
1.12-BEN20PERYLENE
FLUORENE
PHENANTHRENE
1 ,215,6-UlBENlANTHMACEllE
II.OENOI l,2,3-C,Ot PYKEHE
PYRENE
MLlALi kNTIHONY
ARSENIC
BLRYLLIUH
CAUnlUH
CHHIIMIUM
COI'Ptk
CYANIDE
LEAD
HERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED MEKE NEVER UEICCUD
L-IESS TIIANi N-0 NQI DETECTED!
PKELIHINANY OAIA UNLY 10 BE VtUtUU
PLANT 1
SLCUt.OAt-Y PCNI HK1MAKY CUMblNLO SECONUA^Y
UNITS IhfLUEN! EffLUEM REM. SLUUCE SLUDGE SLJDCL FLQIAbLES
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UL/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/l
0
0
c
3
1
3
I 25
1
0
0
4
2V
2
t,
0
3
2
1
0
I 4
1
0
4
0
1
4
0
0
s
I 50
I 50
L 2
\i
450
191
71
55
276
91
L 5u
L 10
L 10
I 10
1
I
1
1
2
L 25
1 10
7
50
40
40
67
50
50
50
40
o7
90
86
90
64
59
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
I
L
117
10
10
10
10
10
25
10
25
10
195
2231
1
10
10
10
10
479
10
t75
479
10
1572
25
313
1572
50
50
754
146
1263
37
I.J20
14571
77429
627
4*657
1000
13343
5
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
I
L
L
L
L
L
I
I
I
I
I
75
10
10
10
10
10
25
10
25
10
23
1240
10
10
10
10
10
250
10
299
250
10
642
25
133
342
50
50
349
66
176
12
599
17bo6
24243
NQI RUN
11029
m
31H6
5
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
I
I
I
10
10
10
10
10
10
25
to
2!»
10
\
42
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0
lu
10
4
25
10
4
10
fc
10
25
67
10
322
19917
£917
59
179B
333
3700
<2
I
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
I
L
t
I
I
L
L
L
1U9
10
10
10
10
10
25
10
25
10
421
511
100
5
10
10
10
1B6
10
137
100
10
lllb
25
2
lllb
5u
50
192
4
23
1
32
443b
16C6
50
112
2Ct
411
3
-------
SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL UA1A
PLAN! I
FRACTION
METALS
PARAMETER
SILVER
THALLIUM
ZINC
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L L
UG/L
INFLUENT
e
50
L
L
SECONDARY
CFFLULM
2
SO
90
HCNT
REM.
75
(,6
PK1MAHY
SLUUGE
25
129714
CJMBIHtD
SLUDtb
02
1
47857
SECUNDAKY
SLUUGL
207
14717
FLU1A8LES
2
N-C METALS ALUMINUM
BARIUM
CALCIUM
IRON
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
UG/L
UG/L
M&/L
UG/L
H&/L
UG/L
mt
129
63
2990
27
104
203
50
79
392
27
111
61
5
87
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
SOT HUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NUT KUM
NOT RUN
NUT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUI.
NUT RUN
NUT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NUT RUN
HOI rtUN
NUI RUN
NUT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT KUN
NUT RUN
NHl RUII
NUT kUN
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED HERE NEVER DETECTED
L-LESS THANI N-0 NOT DETECTED;
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY- —TU BE VERIFIED
-------
MASS BALANCE IN LBS. PEK t'AY
UEEK 1 DATA ONLY
PLANT 1
FRACTION
CONVENTIONAL 8
NON-CONVENT10NAL8
VOLATILES
K
H
A
PARAMETER
BOD
TOTAL SUSP. SOLIbti
COD
OIL I GREASE
TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS
TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDS
TOTAL VOL. SUS. SOLIDS
AHHONIA NITROGEN
TOC
ACRYLON1TRILE
BENZENE
CARDON TETRACHLORIPE
CHLORObENZENE
1.2-DICHLOROETHANE
1.1.1-TRICHLOROETHANE
I*I-DICHLORO£THANE
1f1>2-TRICHLOROETHANE
CHLOROFORM
It1-DICHLOROETHCLENE
li2-TftANS-bICHLOKOETHYLENE
1 > 2-DICIILOROPROPANE
ETHYLBENZENE
HETHVLENE CHLORIDE
HETHYL CHLORIDE
DICHLOROUROHOMETHANE
TRICMOROFLUOROHE THANE
CHLORQDIDROMOHETHANE
U'TRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
2.4.6-TRICHLOROPIIENOL
PARACHLOROHETA CRESOL
2-CHLOROPHENOL
2>4-DIHETHYLFH£NOL
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENOL
ACENAPIITHENE
I .2.4 TRICHI (IKtlbLN/ENE
HEXACHLORQbENZENE
1,2 DICHI ORObEN/ENE
1.3 OICHl
-------
FRACTION
BASE-NEUTRALS
03
A
NETALS
NON-CONV. METALS
MASS BALANCE IN LB9. PER PAY
WEEK 1 DATA ONLY
PLANT 1
PARAMETER
BIS<2-CHLOROETMYOXY> METHANE
IIEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
NAPHTHALENE
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTVL PHTHALATE
DIETHVL PHTHALATE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
1r2-BENZANTHRACENE
3 > 4-BENZOFLUORANTHENE
CHRYSENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
ANTHRACENE
1r12-BENZOPERYLENE
FLUORENE
PHENANTHRENE
1.2I5>6-DIBENZANTHRACENE
INDENOU»2.3-CrD> PYRENE
PYRENE
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
THALLIUM
ZINC
ALUMINUM
BARIUM
CALC1UH
IRON
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
INFLUENT
.4
.2
3.2
23.7
1.7
4.3
.2
2.4
1.4
.4
N-D
.4
.2
2.7
.2
1.1
2.7
.2
,2
1.3
N-D
N-D
N-D
8.9
337
148
12.3
• 36,7
.2
74.1
N-D
3.8
N-D
192
1030
96.3
62329
2437
20039
76.2
TOTAL OUT
N-D
N-D
2.1
16.7
1.6
2.2
.3
1.1
.5
i.e
L 0.1
1.0
N-D
5.9
N-D
1.3
3.9
.6
.6
4.2
.7
4.2
.2
10.6
293
337
7.4
144.4
.3
107.2
.3
2.3
L 0.1
572
_
-
-
-
-
-
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
N-D
N-D
1.6
10.3
1.6
2.2
.3
1.1
.5
.5
N-D
.3
N-D
1.6
N-D
.5
1.6
.5
.3
2.2
N-D
N-D
N-D
3.1
33.1
20.7
3.0
N-D
.3
30.7
N-D
N-D
N-D
68.6
154
37.7
60375
298
20197
84.0
PRIMARY
6LUDOE
N-D
N-D
.5
3.9
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
N^D
N-D
1.3
1.8
1.3
N-D
4.2
N-D
.8
4.2
N-D
N-D
2.0
.4
3.4
L 0.1
3.3
38. B
206
1.7
123
L 0.
35.
L 0.
L 0.
L 0.
346
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
SECONDARY
SLUDOE
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
.3
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
.1
L 0.1
N-D
.3
.0
.1
4.2
221
110
.7
19.3
L 0.1
40.9
.3
2.2
L 0.1
157
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED HERE NEVER DETECTED
L-LE8S THAN* N-D NOT DETCCTEDI
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY TO BE VERIFIED
-------
PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF POLLUTANT PARAMETERS
PLANT 1
3
PARAMETER
bENZENE
1 .1 . 1-TR1CHLOROETHANE
OIL OROFORM
ML'THYLENE CHLORIDE
lEIRACHLOROETHYLENE
10LUENE
IKICHLOROETHYLENE
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
ZINC
ElHYLbENZENE
NICKEL
1.2-TRANS-DICHLOROETHYLENE
PHENOL
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYLk PHTHALATE
CADMIUM
I.1 DICHLOROETHYLENE
NAPHTHALENE
SILVER
ANTHRACENE
PHENANTHRENE
MERCURY
IEAD
IlI-N-bUTYL PHTHALATE
DIETHYL PHTHALAIE
1,2 UICIIl ORObENZENE
1.4-bICHLORObENZENE
l.l-DICHLOROETHANE
bllTVL bENZVL PHTHALATE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
PYRENE
CHLORObENZENE
PENTACHLOROFHENOL
tLUORANIHENE
It UOKENE
1.3 DICHLORObENZENE
CARliON TETRACHLORIDE
1.2 -bENZANIHRACENE
CHRYSENE
I,I.2-TRICHLOKOETHANE
METHYL CHLORIDE
TRICHI OROFLIIOROMETHANE
ACtNAIHTHENE
blS(2 CHIOROEIHYOXY) METHANE
1.215.4 IlIbENZANTHRACL'NE
INDLIUH 1 .2.3-C.D) PYRENE
1 ,2 111 Till OROt THANE
I .2 MLIII OKOPROPANE
UMJfHIl OI.H
li! I.Ill OHObROHOMETHANE
I CHI U.I AMIS NOT LISTED UERE NOT
UNCONFIRMED PESTICIDES UERE ASSUMED NOT
NUHbLKS IN PARENTHESES ARE THE NUHbER OF
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY 10 HE VERIFIED
INFL- PRECL SEC.
UENT EFFL EFFL
100 (28) 33 ( 3) 84
100 (28) 100 ( 3) 100
100 (28) 100 ( 3) 100
100 (28) 100 ( 3) 100
100 (28) 100 ( 3) 100
100 (28) 100 ( 3) 100
100 (28) 100 ( 3) 100
100 (23) 100 ( 3) 100
100 (23) 100 ( 3) 100
100 (26) 0 ( ) 100
100 (23) 100 ( 3) 100
94 (28) 0 ( 3) 100
94 (23) 100 ( 3k 100
93 (28) 0(3) 43
93 (28) 100 < 3) 100
93 (28) 100 ( 3) 100
91 (23) 47 < 3k 71
69 (28) 100 ( 3) 100
82 (28) 0(3) 43
78 (23) 0(3) 0
73 (28) 0(3) 43
73 (28) 0(3) 43
74 (23) 33 ( 3) 100
70 (23) 0(3) 0
48 (28) 33 < 3k 37
41 (28) 0(3) 29
54 (28) 0 ( 3k 14
SO (28) 0 < 3k 29
43 (26) 0(3) 0
39 (28) 0 < 3k 43
39 (28) 0(3) 14
34 (28) 0(3) 57
29 (28) 0(3) 0
29 (26) 47 ( 3) 14
29 (28) 0(3) 43
29 (26) 0(3) 14
21 (26) 0(3) 14
18 (26) 0(3) 0
16 (28) 0 (3) 14
16 (28) 0(3) 14
11 (26) 0(3) 0
7 (26) 0(3) 0
7 (26) 0 ( 3k 14
7 (28) 0(3) 0
7 (28) 0(3) 0
7 (26) 0(3) 14
7 (26) 0(3) 14
4 < 26) 0(3) 0
4 (26) 0(3) 0
4 (26) 0(3) 0
4 (26) 0(3) 57
DETECTED AT ANY SAMPLE POINT
PRIM.
SLDG
7k 100
7) 57
7) 0
7) 100
7) 100
7k 100
7) 100
7) 100
7k 100
7k 100
7k 100
7) 100
7) 100
7) 43
7k 29
7k 84
7k 100
7k 29
7) 71
7k 100
7k 84
7k 64
7k 29
7k 100
7k 0
7) 0
7k 0
7k 0
7k 57
7k 14
7k 0
7k 71
7k 0
7) 14
7) 0
7) 43
7) 0
7k 29
7k 64
7) 84
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 57
7) 0
7k 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 100
COMb
SLDG
7) 0
7) 0
7k 0
7) 0
7) 0
7k 0
7) 0
7) 100
7) 100
7k 0
7k 100
7k 0
7k 100
7k 0
7k 17
7k 83
7k 100
7) 0
7k 30
7k 100
7k 83
7k 83
7k 29
7k 100
7k 0
7k 0
7k 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7k 0
7) 47
7k 0
7) 17
7k 0
7k 33
7k 0
7k 0
7k 47
7k 47
7k 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) SO
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
6EC.
SLDO
SO
0
0
100
83
33
17
7) 100
7k 100
) SO
71 100
k 33
7k 100
) 0
4k 20
4k 40
7k 100
k 0
4k 20
7k 100
4k 40
4k 40
7k 17
71 100
4k 0
4k 0
4k 0
4k 0
k 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
> 0
4k 20
4k 0
4) 0
4) 0
) 33
4) 0
4) 0
) 0
k 0
k 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 20
4) 20
) 0
) 0
) 0
( ) 83
FLOT-
A6LE6
4) 84
4) 14
4) 0
4) 100
4) 71
4) 64
4) 71
4) 100
4) 100
4) 0
4) 100
4k 84
4k 100
4k 29
3k 29
3k 84
4) 100
4k 0
! Sk 37
I 4) 84
I Sk 100
I 3k 100
( 4) 14
(4) 84
( S) 14
( 3) 0
( 3k 0
( 3) 0
( 4) 0
( S) 43
( 3k 0
(3) 100
( 4) 0
( S) 29
( 3) 0
( Sk 14
( Sk 0
(4) 29
S) 84
5) 84
4k 0
4) 0
4) 0
5) 43
Sk 0
5k 0
S) 0
4) 0
4) 0
( 4) 0
(4) 84
TAP
WATER
7) 100 ( 1)
7k 0 ( Ik
7k 100 ( Ik
7k 100 ( Ik
7k 100 (Ik
7) 100 ( 1)
7k 0(1)
7) 0(1)
7) 0(1)
7k 0 ( Ik
7k 0 ( Ik
7k 0(1)
7) tOO ( Ik
7k 0 ( Ik
7k 100 < Ik
7k 100 ( 1)
7k 100 ( Ik
7k 100 < 1)
7) 0 < Ik
7k 100 ( I)
7k 0 < Ik
7k 0 < Ik
7k 100 ( 1)
7k 100 ( 1)
7k 100 ( Ik
7k 0(1)
7k 0 < 1)
7k 041k
7k 0 < Ik
7k 0 ( Ik
7k 0 4 Ik
7k 0 ( Ik
7k 0(1)
7) 0 ( Ik
7k 0<1>
7k 0 ( 1 k
7k 0 ( Ik
7k 100 ( 1)
7k 0(1)
7k 0 (Ik
7k 0 4 Ik
7k 0 1)
7) 0 1)
7) 0 1)
7k 0 1)
7) 0 1 >
7) 0 1 )
7) 0 1 >
7) 0 1 >
7) 0 1)
7) 100 1)
DETECTED
SAMPLES TAKEN
-------
32
PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF POLLUTANT PARAMETERS
PLANT 1
PARAMETER
CHLORODIBROHOMETHANE
2 r 4. A-TRICMLOROPHENOL
PARACHLOROMETA CRESOL
lr2>4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
DI-N-OCTVL PHTHALATE
BENZO (A)PVRENE
ACENAPHTMYLENE
1>12-BENZOPERYLENE
ACRYLONITRILE
2-CHLOROPHENOL
2.4-D1HETHYLPMENOL
3r3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
3.4-BENZOFLUORANTHENE
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUM
SELENIUM
THALLIUM
INFL- PRECL
UENT EFFL
4 (28) 0
4 (28) 0
4 (28) 0
4 (28) 0
4 (2BI 0
4 <2B> 0
4 <2S) 0
4 (28) 0
4 (2BI 0
4 (28) 0
0 (281 0
0 (28) 0
0 (29) 33
0 (28) 0
0 (28) 0
0 (23) 0
0 (23) 0
6 (23) 0
0 (23) 0
0 (23) &
SEC.
EFFL
3) 0
3) 0
3) 0
3) 0
3) 0
3) 0
3> 14
3) 0
3) 0
3) 0
3) 0
3) 14
3) 14
3) 14
3) 0
3) 0
3) 0
3) 0
3) 0
3) 0
PRIM.
EL DO
7) 43 <
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7> 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 71
7) 100
7) 100
7) 100
7) 43
7) 100
COMB
BLDO
7) 0
71 0
7> 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7> 0
7) 0
7> 30
7) 100
7) 100
7) 100
7) 29
7) 43
SEC.
SLPO
> 67
A) 0
6) 0
A) 0
6) 0
6) 0
4) 0
*) 0
6) 0
A) 0
) 17
A) 0
4) 0
A) 0
«) 20
7) 100
7) 100
7) 100
7) 83
7) 83
FLOT-
ABLES
A) 71 (
5) 0 <
3) 0 <
3) 0 (
3) 0 <
3) 0 (
5) 0
3) 0
5) 0
5) 0
A) 14
5) 0
3) 0
S) 0
5) BA
A) 2?
A) 43
A) 100
6) 2?
A) 8A
TAP
UATER
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) O
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7> O
7> 0
7) 0
7> 0
7) 100
7> 0
7> 0
7) 0
7) 0
1)
1)
1)
I)
1)
1)
1)
1>
1>
1)
1>
1)
1>
1)
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED MERE NOT DETECTED AT ANY SAMPLE POINT
UNCONFIRMED PESTICIDES WERE ASSUMED NOT DETECTED
NUMBERS IN PARENTHESES ARE THE NUMBER OF SAMPLES TAKEN
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY-TO BE VERIFIED
-------
SUHHAM OF ANALYTICAL C.A1A
PL AN I 2
FRACIIUN
CONVENT IUNALi
NON-CONVENTIONAL*
VOLAIILES
H>
/A
CNT
REH.
05
91
79
67
US
a
8
69
bJ
70
100
100
•jb
4C
SO
l^J
JS
l'n£ CL
LF'LUENT
20
12
i2
MJT t-UN
KOI f ON
496
1<9
7
70
29
I 100
1
0
1
t
L •.
4
1
L 1
0
4
1
0
1
3
i
0
e>
33
i
4
1
1
L 10
L ;s
L 25
L 10
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
I
L
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
CUMUlNED
SLUOGE
U4S7
21714
3242)
J^Sl
464
2!>571
I42b6
12100
12707
ll'il'l
41
33
t»
i
5
5
5
5
5
2
247
74
5
9
bl
3 Jo
b
iO
5C
to
4
IG
10
10
2S
25
1G
-------
SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL DATA
PLANT 2
FRACTION
BASE-NEUTRALS
o>
en
METALS
NON-CONV. METALS
.PARAMETER
ISOPHORONE
NAPHTHALENE
BISI2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHIIULAlt
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
DtrN-BUTYL PHTMALAU
DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
OIETHYL PHTHALAIE
D1HETHYL PHTHALATE
1,2-BENZANTHRACENE
BEMZO (A)PYRENE
3i4-BENZOFLUOKANIHENt
11,12-BENZOFLUORANIMENE
CHRYSENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
ANTHRACENE
PHENANTHRENE
PYRENE
ANTIHONV
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CHROHIUH
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
THALLIUM
ZINC
ALUMINUM
BARIUM
CALCIUM
IRON
HAGNESIUH
MANGANESE
UNITS
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/t
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
NG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/l
UG/L
UC/L
MG/L
UG/L
MG/L
UG/L
INfLUEN
I
4
10
5
-------
PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF POLLUTANT PARAMETER!2
PLANT 2
Co
A
PARAMETER
tENZENE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYLbENZENE
METHYLENE CULORlbE
TETRACIILOROETHYLEHE
TOLUENE
BI8(2-ETHYLHEXYL> PHTHALATE
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
CllhQHIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
NICKEL
ZINC
1 .1•I-IRICHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLEME
bI-N-t>UTYL PHTHALATE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
CAOHIUH
PHENOL
1,2-DICIILORObENZENE
NAPHTHALENE
MERCURY
1.1-bICHLOftOETHYLENE
D1CHLOROBROHOHETHANE
bl-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
1,2-UICHLOROETHANE
FLUORANIHENE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
PYRENE
CHLORObENZENE
1.1-blCHLOROETHANE
CHLORObliiROHOMETHANE
ANTHRACENE
PHENANTHRENE
LEAD
SILVER
1,2-bICHLOKOPROPANE
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
1.J-blCHLORObENZENE
1,4-bICIILORObENZENE
2,6-bINITROTOLUENE
ISOPHORONE
bENZO (A)PYRENE
3,4-bENZOFLUORANIHENE
I 1.12-bENZOFlUOKANTHENE
ACHYl ONITKIL*
1 . 3 -IiICHLOROf'RUPYLENE
liKOHOf UkM
IK ILHLORUI-LUUKQME THANE
111 CHI UhUblFLUOKUHE fHANE
1' Nl TKOHIENOL
rOlLUTANIS NOT LISTEb MERE NOT bETECIEb
UNCONFlRMEb PESTICIbES UERE ASSUMED NOT
NUMbtKS IN PARENTHESES ARE THE NUHbER OF
F-KELIHINARY bATA ONLY-TO *E VERIFIED
INFL-
UENT
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
86
86
64
86
86
71
71
71
71
57
57
57
43
43
43
43
29
29
29
29
29
29
29
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
0
0
o
0
0
0
PftE CL
EFFL.
7> 43
7) 86
7> 29
7) 100
7) 86
7) 100
7> 86
7) 43
7) 100
7) 100
7) 0
7) 100
7) 100
7) 14
7) 43
7> 57
7) 29
7) 0
71 100
71 14
7) 14
7) 17
7) 43
7) 57
7) 29
7> 2V
7) 0
7) 29
7) 0
7) 14
7) 0
7) 43
7) O
7) 0
7) 17
7) 17
7) 0
7) 43
7> 29
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 14
7) 0
7) 71
SEC.
EFFL
7) 57
7) 100
7) 29
7> 86
7) 100
7) 100
7) 86
7) 57
6) 100
4) 100
) 100
6) 100
6) 100
7) 14
7) 14
7) 57
7) 29
6) 0
7) 86
7> 29
7) 29
4) 29
7) 57
7) 84
7) 14
7) 29
7) 0
7> 29
7) 0
7) 0
7> 0
7) 57
7> 0
7) 0
6) 14
6> 14
7) 0
7* 14
7> 57
7» 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7> 0
7> 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7> 0
7) 43
COM*.
SLliO
7) 86
7) 0
7) 29
7) 100
7) 86
7) 86
7) 100
7) 14
7) 100
7) 100
7) 100
7) 100
7> 86
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 100
7) 14
7) 0
7> 43
7) 29
7) 0
7) 100
7) 0
71 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 71
7) 0
7> 0
7> 29
7) 71
7) 71
7) 100
7) 86
71 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 71
7) 0
7> 14
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
( 7> 0
SEC. bAF.
SLDO 8LDO
7) 100 1) 100
7) 01) 0
7> 100 1) 100
7) 100 11 100
7> 0 1) 100
7) 100 1) 100
7) 0 > 0
7) 0 ) 0
7) 0 > 0
7) 0 ) 0
7) 100 1) 100
7) 0 ( > 0
7) 0 < ) 0
7) 0(1) 0
7) 0<1) 0
7) 0 < > 0
7k 0 ( > 0
7) 0 ( > 0
7) 0 < > 0
7) 0 ( > 0
7) 0 < ) 0
7) 0 ( ) 0
7) 0 < 1) 0
7) 100 ( 1) 100
7) 0 < ) 0
7> 0 < 1) 0
7) 0 < > 0
7) 0 < > 0
7) 0 ( > 0
7) 0 < I) 0
7) 0(1) 0
7) 0<1> 0
7) 0 ( > 0
7) 0 ( > 0
7) 0 ( ) 0
7) 0 ( > 0
7) 0(1) 0
7) 0 ( > 0
7) 0 ( > 0
7) 0 ( ) 0
7) 0 ( > 0
7) 0 ( ) 0
7) 0 ( > 0
7) 0 ( > 0
7) 0 ( ) 0
7) 0(1) 0
7) 0(1) 100
7) 0(1) 100
7) 0(1) 0
7) 0(1) 100
(7) 0 ( ) 0
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
>
>
>
>
1)
)
>
1)
1)
>
)
)
k
>
1
I
I)
1)
)
1)
)
)
)
1)
1)
1)
1
1
1
1
1
1
TAP
WATER
0
100
0
100
0
100
100
100
0
100
0
0
100
0
0
100
too
0
100
too
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
1 0
1 0
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
I)
I)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
I)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1 )
1 )
1 >
( 1)
AT ANY SAMPLE POINT
DETECTEb
SAMPLES TAKEN
-------
PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF POLLUTANT PARAMETERS
PARAMETER
4-NITROFHENOL
3r3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
1 . 2-BENZAMTHRACENE
CIIRYSENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUM
SELENIUM
THALLIUM
INFL-
UENT
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
0
0
7)
7)
7>
7)
7)
7)
7)
7)
7)
7)
PLANT
\
PRE CL
EFFL,
43 (
0 (
14 (
14 (
14 <
0 <
0 (
0 (
0 <
0 <
2
7)
7)
7)
7)
7>
A)
«)
A)
6)
6)
SEC.
EFFL
29
14
14
14
29
0
0
0
0
0
7)
7)
7>
7)
7)
7>
7>
7)
7)
7)
COMB.
SI HO
0
0
29
29
0
too
100
94
86
43
7)
7>
7)
7)
7)
7)
7)
7)
7)
7)
SEC.
SLOO
0 < I
0 (
0 <
0 <
0 <
0
0
0
0
0
DAF.
SLEIO
0 (
0 (
0 <
0 <
0 <
0 (
0 (
0 1
0 <
0 (
TAP
MATER
) 0
) 0
) 0
> 0
> 0
> 0
) 0
) 0
> 0
> 0
I)
1)
1 )
1 )
1)
1)
1>
1)
1)
1)
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED AT ANY SAMPLE POINT
UNCONFIRMED PESTICIDES WERE ASSUMED NOT DETECTED
NUMBERS IN PARENTHESES ARE THE NUMBER OF SAMPLES TAKEN
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY-TO BE VERIFIED
-------
MftSB BALANCE IM LBS. Ff«
PLANT 2
FRACTION
CONVENT IONALB
NON-CONVENTIONAL8
VOLATILE8
PARAMETER
BOD
TOTAL SUSP. SOLIDS
COD
OIL I GREASE
TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS
TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDS
TOTAL VOL. SUB. SOLIDS
AHHONIA NITROGEN
TOC
ACRYLONITRILE
BENZENE
CHLOROBENZENE
1f2-DICHLOROETHANE
1 . 1 f 1 -TRICIILOROETHANE
Irl-DICHLOROETHANE
CHLOROFORM
1.1 -DICIILOROETHYLENE
1t2-DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYLBENZENE
HETHYLENE CHLORIDE
DICHLOROBROHOME THANE
CHLORODIBROMOMETIIANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
2-NITROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENOL
1.2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1.3-DICHLOKOBENZENE
1>4-DICULOROBENZENE
3>3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
2.4-DINITROTOLUENE
FLUORANTHENE
IBOPHORONE
NAPHTHALENE
BI8(2-ETHYLHEXYL> PHTHALATE
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-BUTYL PM1HALATE
DI-N-OCTYL HIIHAI A1E
DIETMYL PHHIAIATE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
1.2-BENZANTHKACENE
-------
MASS BALANCE IN LBB. PER DAY
PLANT 2
FRACTION
BABE-NEUTRALS
METALS
NON-CONV. METALS
PARAMETER
3>4-BENZOFLUORANTHENE
11t12-BENZOFLUORANTHENE
CHRYSENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
ANTHRACENE
PHENANTHRENE
PYRENE
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUM
CADHIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
THALLIUM
ZINC
ALUMINUM
BARIUM
CALCIUM
IRON
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
MOLYBDENUM
SODIUM
TIN
TITANIUM
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
INFLUENT
L 0.1
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
L 0.1
.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
.3
4.8
3.6
5.2
1.1
L 0.1
2.0
N-D
L 0.1
N-D
IB. 7
36.2
3.0
3928
111
828
18.9
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
SECONDARY
TOTAL OUT EFFLUENT
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
0.1 N-D
N-D N-D
O.
0,
0.
0.
O.
0.
0.
O.
0.
3.
3.
1O.
2.
Ot
2.
0.
0.
0.
10.
L 0.1
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
J.3
.7
9.4
.2
L 0.1
1.3
N-D
L 0.1
N-D
3.5
3.4
1.7
4400
12.7
818
11.8
.4
404
.4
.4
.4
.4
COMBINED
SLUDGE
L 0.1
N-D
L 0.1
N-D
L 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
2.1
2.8
.5
1.9
L 0.1
.8
L 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
6.9
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED WERE NEVER DETECTED
L-LESS THAN! N-D NOT DETECTED!
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY TO BE VERIFIED
-------
OF ANALYTICAL DATA
PLANT j
I KAC I I UN
CONVENTIONAL*
NON-CONVENTIONALS
VOLATILE^
ACIO LXIKACI
UASt-NLUIKALS
PAKAHCTCK
UQD
TOTAL SUSP. SuLILS
COO
UIL C GKEAit
TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS
TOTAL OISS. SJLlOS
SEIREAbLC SULIOS
TOTAL VOLAIILt SuLIUS
VOLATILE DISS. SOLIbS
TOTAL VOL. SUS. SOLIDS
AMMONIA NITROGEN
TOC
ittNZENt
1 ,1.1-IKlCHLUkUt IHAUt
1. I-OICIILOHQEIIUNI
CHIUROFUKM
1 , l-DICHLOKGLIH«LlNE
1 ,2-OlCHLOfiOPKLif'Al.t
EIIULbENKN'E
HtTMYLENE CllliJHIt/L
MEIMVL CHLOK1UE
OICHLOKOBKOHOHE THAKL
IK ICMLURi)FLUl
1615
38020
b076
NUT KUN
205t> 7
2619
17662
31
15194
2
N-0
N-0
N-0
N-C
N-0
96
1
N-0
N-0
N-0
N-0
IfcOl
54
N-0
N-D
30
4310
N-0
N-0
N-U
N-0
23
-------
SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL DATA
PLANT 3
FRACTION
BASE-NEUTRALS
to
METALS
PARAMETER
NAPHTHALENE
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL> f'HTIULATE
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATt
OI-N-BUTYL PHTHALAIE
DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
D1ETHYL PHTHALATE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
1>2-BENZANTHRACENE
BEN20 (AIPYRCNE
3,4-OENiUFLUGHANTHENE
11,12-BENZOFLUORANTMbNE
CHRYSENE
, ANTHRACENE
FLUORENE
PHENANTHRENE
PYKENE
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BtRYLLlUH
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANlDt
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
ZINC
ALUMINUM
BARIUM
BORON
CALCIUM
COBALT
IRON
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
MOLYBDENUM
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED MERE NEVER DETECTED
L-LESS THAN I N-D NOT DETECTED! .
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY- TO BE VERIFIED
NON-CONV. HETALS
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
tiG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
iJG/L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
UG/l
UG/L
NG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UC/L
HG/L
UG/L
UG/L
MG/L
UG/L
UG/L
INFLUINI
3
29
6
7
4
5
2
0
0
0
0
a
2
I 10
2
0
L 4
3
t 1
4
2V
295
96
97
L 1000
59
I 4
2
317
23U4
116
20V
24
26
12026
*
303
147
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
SECUNDARY PCNT
EFFLUENT REM.
10
5
10
5
10
1
10
10
10
3
5
to
10
10
10
io
4
5
0
6
10
43
138
44
1030
89
4
4
61
2S1
1
256
19
11
233
3
23
151
=\1
29
BO
06
as
55
81
09
V9
11
21
58
98
25
92
t
L
t
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
I
I
I
L
L
L
t
PRE CL
EFFLUENT
10
9
10
3
10
1
10
10
10
5
5
10
10
10
IG
10
4
2
5
1
7
39
S3
30
1000
42
4
4
70
79
1
252
27
6
116
3
17
152
PHIHARY
SLODCt
78
3CJ
57
263
N-D
(4-0
N-D
15
H-u
N-0
N-D
15
260
10
260
66
130
403
13
i'3i
5000
25667
20530
6833
47333
647
2U
417
27667
NUT KUN
NOT RUN
NOT HUH
NOT RUN
NUT RUN
NOT HUH
NUT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT kUN
COMblNID
SLUDGE
N-D
157
N-D
37
N-D
N'D
N-D
N-0
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
104
N-0
104
32
52
US
10
42
4750
20500
7223
1475
29250
478
12
368
16000
NUT RUN
NOT IS UN
NOT KUN
NUT RUN
NOT RUN
NUT kUN
NUT kUN
NOT kUN
NUT KUN
-------
Yl I C;1L 0,'U
IL
H£H.
UO/i
so
15'.
71
66
J
3
?U
PK1MAKV
SLUDCL
HOI KUN
NUT KUIJ
t.UI BUN
NOT KUN
NllI RON
COHblNi.ll
SLUDCfc
NOi KUN
NO) KUU
NO! RUN
NO I KUN
/I
I'llIlUIANIS Mill LISUD kltKL NtVtK JL
1-ltSS 1HANI N-U NQI DtlECTLUi
fHU KIIIMM Urtlrt UNLr- TO B£
-------
HASS BALANCE IN LBS. PER DAY
PLAN1 3
FRACTION
CONVENTIONALS
NON-CONVENTIONAL9
VOLATILE9
A
PARAMETER
BOD
TOTAL SUSP. SOLIDS
COD
OIL S GREASE
TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS
TOTAL DISS. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDS
VOLATILE DISS. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOL. SUS. SOLIDS
AMMONIA NITROOEN
TOC
BENZENE
111.1-TRICHLOROETIIANE
Irl-DICHLOROETHANE
2-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER
CHLOROFORM
Irl-DICHLOROETIIYLENE
1.2-DICHLOROFROPANE
ETHYLDENZENE
HETHYLENE CHLORIDE
METHYL CHLORIDE
DICMLOROBROMOMETHANE
TRICMLOROFLUOROME THANE
CHLORODIBROMOME THANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
VINYL CHLORIDE
PENTACHLOROFHENOL
PHENOL
t > 214-TRICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1f4-DICHLOROBENZENE
FLUORANTHENE
NAPHTHALENE
BIS<2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-BUTYL FHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
1i2-BENZANTHRACENE
BENZO
-------
MASS BALANCE IN IBS. HER DAY
PLANT 3
I KALI ION
HtTALB
CO
H"
/I
NON-CONV. HEtALS
PARAMETER
3.4-bENZOFLUOfcANlMENE
11i12-bENZOFLUOKANTHENE
CHRYSENE
ANTHRACENE
FLUURENE
rilENANCIIKENE
PYRENE
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUM
CADHIUH
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
2INC
ALUMINUM
BAR 1UM
BORON
CALCIUM
COBALT
IRON
MAONESIUM
MANUANESE
MOLYBDENUM
bODIUM
TIN
TITANIUM
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
INFLUENT
L 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
.2
N-D
.2
L 0.1
N-D
.2
N-D
.4
2.3
23.1
8.3
e.s
3.3
N-D
L 0.1
28.0
210
10.2
25. 5
2154
2.3
1062
371
30.2
13.0
5077
3.6
14.1
6.3
.3
IU1AL OUT
N-D
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
N-D
L 0.
L 0.
L 0.
L 0.
L 0.
.3
3.0
13.2
6.3
4.6
e.o
I 0.1
.2
12.7
_
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
.3
.8
3.8
3.2
3.9
7.8
N-D
N-D
S.4
22.1
.1
22.7
1636
.9
IS. 3
243
2.0
13.3
5USO
.4
.3
2.3
.3
COMBINED
SLUDOE
N-D
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
N-D
L 0.
L 0.
L 0.
L 0.
L 0.
L 0.
2.2
9.4
3.3
.7
.2
L 0.1
.2
7.3
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
PRIMARY
SLUUUE
N-U
N-D
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
4.
3.
1.
0.
O.
4.6
NOT RUN
NQ1 RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
N01 RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
IKIMAKY bl UlUJt UtIANUlY IB NUT INUlll'LH IN IIII Al
HIlllJIANIb Nil) I Ibltli UthE NtVLI. HtlkClELl
I I L tili IIIANI NO NO I Ht ILCIt li*
MVtl IHINAkY flAIA ONLY 10 bE UtRIKJLD
inn COLUMN (INCLUDED IN COMBINED
-------
PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF POLLUTANT PARAMETERS
PLANT 3
! CO
• A
PARAMETER
1•1.1-IRICHLOROETHANE
CHLOROFORM
HETMYLENE CHLORIDE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL> PHTHALATE
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
ZINC
BENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
PHENOL
CADMIUM
NICKEL
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
1.1-DICHLOROETHYLENE
NAPHTHALENE
DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
ARSENIC
ANTHRACENE
PHENANTHRENE
SILVER
1.1-DICHLOROETHANE
1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
1.2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1> 3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-D1CHLOROBENZENE
FLUORANTHENE
1,2-BENZANTHRACENE
BENZO (A)PYRENE
3.4-BENZOFLUORANTHENE
11>12-BENZOFLUORANTHENE
CHRYSENE
PYRENE
METHYL CHLORIDE
DICHLOROBROHOHETHANE
CHLORODIBROMOHETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
PENTACHLOROPHEHOL
1,1,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
FLUORENE
ANTIMONY
BERYLLIUM
MERCURY
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED HERE NOT DETECTED
UNCONFIRMED PESTICIDES WERE ASSUMED NOT
NUMBERS IN PARENTHESES ARE THE NUMBER OF
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY-TO BE VERIFIED
INFL- PRE CL SEC. PRIM. COMB. TAP THICKENER
UENT EFFL. EFFL BLDO SLOG UATER OVERFLOW
100 47
100 (10) 100
100 (ID 100
100 (10) 47
too too
71 (11) 0
71 (111 0
71 (11) 0
70 (lOt 47
70 (10) 67
62 (11) 73
82 (It) 23
73 (11) 0
33 (11> 0
43 (ID 0
43 (11) 0
40 (10) 33
34 (11) 0
34 (11) 0
30 (10) 0
(11) 6
(ID 0
(It) 0
(11) 0
(11) 0
(ID 0
(11) 0
(11) 0
(11) 0
(11) 0
(11) 0
(11) 0
(11) 9
0 (11) 0
0(11) 0
0 (11) 0
0 (11) 0
6 (ID o
0 (ID 0
0 (11) 0
0 (1O> 0
0 (10) 0
0 (10) 0
4) 30
4) 23
4) 100
4) 0
4) 100
3) 100
3) 100
4) 100
3) 100
3) tOO
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
3) 73
3) 100
4) 23
4) 23
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
3) 0
4) 0
4) 9
3) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 23
4) 25
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
3) 0
3) 25
3) 0
4) 33
4) 0
4) 33
4) 0
4) 33
4) 100
4) 33
4) 33
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) 47
4) 33
4> 67
4) 100
4) 100
4) 47
4) 0
4) 47
4> 47
4) 0
4) 0
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) 0
4) 33
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 33
4) 100
4) 33
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 33
4) 100
4) 33
4) 0
4) 0
4) 47
4) 0
4) 47
4) 33
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
3) 0
3) 0
3) 23
3) 100
3) 73
3) 73
3) 0
3) SO
3) 100
3) 100
3) 100
3) 100
3) 100
3) 25
3) 73
3) 100
3) 100
3) 100
3) 0
3) 0
3) 0
3) 0
3) 0
3) 0
3) 100
3) 100
3) 100
3) 100
3) 0
3) 0
3) 0
3) 0
3) 0
3) 0
3) 100
3) 0
3) 0
3) 0
3) 0
3) 0
3) 100
3) 0
3) 0
3) 0
3) 0
3) 23
3) 0
3) 0
3) 100
3) 100
3) 75
4> 0 ( D 100
4) 100 ( 1) 100
4) 100 ( D 100
4) 0
4) 0
4) 100
4) 0
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
4> 0
4) IOO
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 100
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
1) 100
D 100
1) 100
1) 0
1) 100
1) 100
1) 100
1) 100
1) 100
1) 100
1) 0
1) 100
1) 100
1) 0
D 100
i> too
1) 0
1) 100
1) 100
D 0
D 0
1) 100
D 0
1) 0
1) 0
D 0
1) 0
D 0
1) 0
1) 0
1) 0
1) 0
1) 0
1) 0
D 0
1) 0
1) 0
1) 0
D 0
D 0
D 0
1> 0
1) 0
D 0
D 0
1) 0
1) 0
1) 0
1 )
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
1)
1)
D
D
D
D
D
1)
D
D
1>
D
D
D
D
D
1)
D
D
1)
D
D
1)
1)
1 )
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
1 )
1)
D
D
D
D
D
D
CTED AT ANY SAMPLE POINT
NOT DETECTED
ER OF SAMPLES TAKEN
-------
PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF POLLUTANT PARAMETERS
PLANT 3
PARAMETER
SELENIUM
INFL-
UENT
PRE CL
EFFL.
SEC.
EFFL
PRIH.
SLDO
COMB.
SLDO
TAP
WATER
THICKENER
OVERFLOW
(10)
0 ( 41 100 ( 3> 100 < 4)
< 1)
( I)
H-
CO
CO
A
NOT IISTEO WERE NOT DETECTED AT ANY SAMPLE POINT
UNCONFIRMED PESTICIDES UERE ASSUMED NOT DETECTED
NimbL'RS IN PARENTHESES ARE THE NUMBER OF SAMPLES TAKEN
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY-TO BE VERIFIED
-------
FRACTION
CONVENT IONALS
NON-CONVENTIONAL;
VOLATILE*
ACID EXTRACT
BASE-NEUTRALS
SUHMAHY CF ANALYTICAL DAtA
PLANT 4
PARAMETER
BOO
TOTAL SUSP. SOLIDS
COO
OIL t GREASE
TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS
TOTAL DISS. SOLIDS
SETTLE ABLE SOLID!,
TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDS
VOLATILE 01SS. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOL. SUS. SOLIDS
AMMONIA NITROGEN
TOC
BENIENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIOE
CHLOROBENZENE
,2-OICHLOROETHAIJE
,1,1-TRICHLOHOETHANE
iti2-TRICHLOROETHANE
, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOKOHMANE
HLOROFORM
tl-OICHLOKOETHVLENE
, 2-TRAIJS-D1CHLOROETHYLENE
.2-DICHLOROPROPANE
ETMYLBEN/ENE
HETHYLENE CHLORIDE
DICHLOR03ROMOMETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TR1CHLOROETHYLENE
VINYL CHLORIDE
2t4-OIMEIHYLPHENUL
2-N1TROPHENOL
2.4-D1N1TROPHENOL
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENOL
ACENAPHTHENE
UN M s
MG/L
HG/L
MG/L
MC/L
UC/L
MG/L
MG/L
HL/L
HG/L
HG/L
HG/L
HG/L
MG/L
UG/l
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UC/L
1NFLULM
L
L
L
L
t
I
L
t
L
L
152
It*
3*3
117
123
402
252
5
I7H
bO
tie
9
99
1
2
1
2
264
2
IB
e
13
25
1
44
282
1
385
36
497
33
3
2
50
9
16
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
I
L
L
L
SECONDARY PC^tl
EFFLUENT RcM.
22
43
81
16
2U
276
207
0
11 i
5)
29
0
3D
1
2
1
2
89
2
2
3
3
7
1
1
128
1
134
0
37
33
1
2
50
5
1
86
74
76
36
77
31
18
too
37
27
75
11
62
69
89
63
77
72
98
55
a5
100
93
67
44
94
COMBINED
SLUUGt
16300
59667
597b3
1012B
677
63583
1790
NOT RUN
34683
1050
29933
207
14538
40
270
N-D
N-0
507
441
43
1
2347
54993
4
1467
142
b4
958
984
467
N-0
N-D
N-0
N-0
25
103
UI&G3TEO
SLUDGE
5500
41917
34()63
9048
1158
45917
659
NUT RUN
21533
405
15067
523
11602
20
N-D
252
65
37
N-3
194
N-0
3
9800
7
910
16
K'l)
10
1647
120
27
14-1)
37
200
II -0
70
UG/L
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED HERE NEVER DETECTED
L-LESS THAN! N-0 NOT DETECTEDI
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY^ TO BE VERIFIED
L 4
L 4
N-0
65
-------
SutirtAKY (j| ANALYTICAL LAI*
PLANT 4
fKACIICJN
BASE-NLUIHALS
HLSI ICIULS
tit 1*1 i
1 ,2-DlCllLOkCbLI^Lt.t
l,3-OICHLO>4
11 1.5
6 o7
I do
3
j
a
u
3
2
3
3
3
15
<:
3J
20
b
163
5'J
5 )
2
I -jO
29 64
17 c,4
1 > CH
S3 5o
450 b4
7 i5
50
3 113
J23 ^0
SLJUCE
262
25<:
Hit
114
l.-u
64k>
IllCb
2650
427
K-Li
N*u
16
23
23
la
N-u
to2
H
c02
N-3
121
L 1000
L 1000
I 1030
I 1000
m
403
25
516
17SUC
lOoOO
193
41000
360000
256?
20
lit 7
143333
UldSlLU
SLuUCE
116
1C
4; >
•SI
N-J
<45
H437
H*00
33
H-'J
N~l/
59
25
i">
t9
2b
37S
^6
37t<
N-13
90
L 1000
L 1000
L 1 000
L 1000
116
333
30
660
25U33
11333
407
V>333
4o3333
3063
23
-------
SUMMARY |JF ANALYTICAL DATA
PLANT 4
FRACTION
NON-CUNV. METALS
PARAMETER
ALUMINUM
BARIUM
CALCIUM
IKON
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
SODIUM
UNITS
INFLUtl.1
StCtNOARY PCNT
EFI-LUINT HEM.
CUHDINED
SLUDGt
OlGI-.SItC
SLUDGE
UG/L
LG/L
MG/L
LG/L
MG/L
UG/L
MG/L
2*60
133
11
73bU
3
633
3i
5U*
33
Jb
23!>S
2
179
29
76
75
tiH
J3
72
•J
NOT F.UN
NUT kON
KOI FUN
NOT FUU
KOI F.UN
NOT KUM
NOT RUN
NOT RLN
KOI RUN
NOT KUf.
NCIF NUN
NUT RUH
NOT RUN
NUT KUN
5TT oo
CO o
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED HtKE NEVER UEILCTEO
L-LESS THANI N-0 NOT OETECTtUl
PRELIHINARY DATA ONLY- TO BE VERIFIED
-------
MASS I ,>Nq£ IN LbS. PER PAY
PLANT 4
1-hACTION
LONVENIIONALS
NUN-CONVENTIONALS
VOLATILEb
CO
•O
/I
PAkAMETER
TOTAL SUSP. CtlllDS
COD
OIL t GKEAiiE
TOTAL T'tlENOlS
TOTAL BOLIbS
TO1AL DISS. SOLIUS
TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDS
VOLATILE HISS. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOL. SUS. SOLIDS
AMMONIA NITKOOEN
TOC
BENZENE
CARBON TETKACULOMDE
Ctll.OKODENZENE
1 ,2-mCHLOKOETIIANt
1 > 1 , 1 - IK I CHLOROE THANE
\>\, 2-TRICHLOKOETHANE
lr 1 .2>2-TETfcACHLOK-O£THANE
CHLOROETIIANE
BIBICMLOKOME IHYl > ETHER
2-CHLOKOETIIYL VINYL ETHER
CHLOROFORM
1 . 1-DICHLOKOETHYLENE
1 . 2-TRANS-tiICHlOROETHYLENE
1 ,2-DICHLUROF-ROPANE
ETHYL BENZENE
HETHYLENE CHLORIDE
DICHLORObKOMOHETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
VINYL CHLORIDE
2. 4-OIMETHYl PHtNOL
2-NITROPHENOL
2.4-bINITROf'HtNOL
F'ENTACHLOKOI IIENOL
PHENOL
ACENAPHTHtML
1,2 lilCHI ,OKTI[itN7LNE
I , J bICHt OKUl'tN/l Ht
1 .4 II I CHI UKOLiLN?ENE
FLIUIRANrilLNE
ACID EXIKACT
-NEU1RA1 8
NAHUIIA1 LIJL
t.imuiNLD UlllblJE OUAN11IY Id Mill INLMIUitU IN TOTAL OUT COLUMN (INCLUHLD IN DIBESTED SLUDOE)
MK1IIIANIS NOT LISIEU WtKE NEVER liEIECIED
I Ittiti THAN* N-b Nil I l>ULCILLl>
I Ivtl IM1NARY bATA ONLY ---1O fc£ V£f;IFILb
INK1.UENT
105745
113996
239031
81691
85642
2B02B3
173351
123757
35778
B 1342
6.4
49237
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-0
198
N-D
12.8
N-D
NOT RUN
N-0
3.5
8.7
17.4
N-0
30.9
197
N-D
268
25.0
346
N-D
1.4
N-D
N-D
3.8
9.8
N-D
73.4
N D
9.4
N 1
N-D
35.3
1UTAL OUT
2U734
1JUU2
141763
33451
22333
307411
145738
131552
41103
57871
7.1
53404
L 0.1
N-0
.6
.2
41.9
N-D
1.3
L 0.1
L 0.1
2.1
2.2
29.4
L 0.1
2.3
89.0
N-D
93.2
4.1
24.2
L 0.1
N-D
L 0.1
.3
N-D
.5
.2
4.4
L 0.1
2.9
. 1
1 .4
1 . 1
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
14*90
29632
56591
11039
19438
192665
144092
77740
40090
20219
5.8
26611
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
61.8
N-D
1.0
N-0
NOT -RUN
N-D
2,1
2.2
3.1
N-D
N-D
89.0
N-D
93.2
1.5
23.9
N-D
N-D
N-D
W-0
N-D
.3
N-D
4.1
N-D
1.8
N-D
L 0.1
N-D
DIGESTED
SLUDGE
13744
104750
85174
22412
2893
114744
1444
53812
1013
37452
1.3
28993
L 0.1
N-D
.4
.2
L 0.1
N-D
.5
1- 0.
L 0.
L 0.
L 0.
L 0.
24.5
L O.I
2.3
L O.I
N-D
L 0.1
4.4
.3
L 0.1
N-D
L 0. 1
.3
N-0
.2
.2
.3
L 0.1
1.1
.1
N-D
1 . 1
SLUunt
304B8
99405
99599
16874
1127
105930
2982
57782
1742
49849
.3
S9707
L 0.1
,4
N-D
N-D
.8
.7
L 0.1
N-0
NO
N-D
L 0.1
3.9
91. A
L 0.1
2.4
.2
.1
1.6
1.4
.8
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
.2
N-D
.5
.4
1.9
.2
H Ll
1 .1
-------
MASS BALANCE IN LBS. PER PAY
PLANT 4
FRACTION
BASE-NEUTRALS
PESTICIDES
HETAL8
g*
NON-CONV. METALS
PARAMETER
N-NITROSGDIHE1HYLAMINE
BIS(2-ETIIYLMEXYL> PHTHALATE
BUTYL BENZYL PlirilALATE
DI-N-BUTYL PHTMALATE
DIETHYL FHTHALATE
li2-BENZANTHRACENE
3t4-BENZOFLUORANTHENE
11.12-BENZOFLUORANTHENE
CHRYSENE
ACENAPMTHYLENE
ANTHRACENE
FLUORENE
PHENANTHRENE
INDENO PYRENE
PYRENE
DIELDRIN
HEPTACHLOR
ALPHA-BHC
GAMMA-DMC
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
ZINC
ALUMINUM
DARIUH
CALCIUM
IRON
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
SODIUM
INFLUENT
N-D
21.5
11,5
12.3
5.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
.2
N-D
,2
.6
N-D
L O.t
L 0.1
N-D
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
1.6
54.0
32.4
25.6
BB.3
.?
14.2
N-D
12.2
344
1715
105
11272
5130
1775
163
22077
T01AL OUT
2.1
29.0
12.2
4.4
.2
L 0.
L 0.
L 0.
L 0.
L 0.
, '
L 0.
,
N-D
.2
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
.1
.3
.8
L 0.1
1.9
05.7
50.2
V.I
160
-
12.7
L 0.1
8.2
585
_
-
-
-
-
-
-
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
I 0.1
7.7
1.2
4.3
.2
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
.3
20.3
11.7
8.1
36.7
.3
5.0
N-D
2.3
156
407
26.3
25216
164?
1374
125
20452
DIGESTED
SLUDGE
N-D
21.1
11.0
L 0.1
N-D
L 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
.7
I 0.1
.7
N-D
.2
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
.3
.8
L 0.1
1.6
65.4
38.3
1.0
123
NOT RUN
7.7
L 0.1
5.7
42?
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
CUHDINED
SLIIIiUr
N -D
13.4
4.4
.7
N-D
0.1
0.1
O.t
0.1
1.0
0.1
1.0
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
.2
.7
L 0.1
.7
27.4
18,0
.3
613,3
NOT RUN
4.3
L 0.1
3.3
23?
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NO I RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
COMBINED SLUDGE QUANTITY IB NOT INCLUDED IN TOTAL OUT COLUMN (INCLUDED IN DIGESTED SLUDGE)
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED WERE NEVER DETECTED
L-LESS THANI N-D NOT DETECTEDI
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY TO BE VERIFIED
-------
PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF POLLUTANT PARAMETERS
PLANT «;
PARAMETER
1.1.1-IR1CHLOROETHANE
CHLOROFORM
1.2-TRAN8-BICHLOROETHYLENE
HETHVLENE CHLORIDE
TR1CMLOROETHYLENE
PENTACIILORPPHENOL
PHENOL
1 i 2-DICHLOROBENZENE
NAPHTHALENE
BIS42-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
OI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
DIETMYL PHTHALATE
CHROMIUM
COPPER
LEAD
MERCURY
SILVER
ZINC
I.1>2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
f~k 1.1-DICHLOROETIIYLENE
f i ETHYLBENZENE
*~ TOLUENE
V*V CO 1.4-DICHLOROSENZENE
A l*» CYANIDE
NICKEL
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CADMIUM
2,4-DIMCTIIYLPHENOL
OAMMA-DHC
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
ANTHRACENE
PHENANTIIRENE
INDEN041.2.3-C.D) PYRENE
DIELDRIN
IIEPIACHLOR
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
CHIOROBENZENE
1.2-DICHLOROETHANE
I , I .2-TRICHLOROETHANE
1,2-bICHLOROFROPANE
01 CHI OROBROMOHE1HANE
VINYL CHI OR1DE
2 NIlkOt-HENOL
2.4 DIN!IRGPHENOL
ACLNAFUIHENE
1 . J IMI 111 OKOBLNZENE
M UUKANIIItNE
1SOHIOKONE
1,2 bENZANIHKACENE
lOUUIAHIS NOT LISTED UERE NOT
UNCONFIRMED PESTICIDES UERE ASSUMED NOT DETECTED
NUHbEKS IN PARENTHESES ARE THE NUMBER OF SAMPLES TAKEN
FKELIMINARY DATA ONLY-TO BE VERIFIED
INFLUENT
100
100
100
100
100
100
too
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
63
63
61
63
63
63
63
47
67
SO
SO
17
17
17
17
17
17
Q
o
Q
0
Q
Q
Q
0
o
Q
0
4>
4>
4)
4>
A)
4)
4>
4>
4»
4>
4>
4>
4>
A)
4)
At
4)
4>
4>
4>
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4>
4>
4)
4)
0 ( 6 >
0 < 4>
0 44)
0 < 6>
CTED AT ANY
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
100
100
100
100
100
0
SO
SO
0
100
63
100
33
too
too
63
100
33
100
30
63
0
17
SO
47
33
100
17
0
47
0
0
0
Q
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Q
0
0
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4>
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
6)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4>
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4>
41
4>
4)
4)
41
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
0 < 4>
0 ( 4)
33 < 4)
0 ( 4)
SAMPLE POINT
COMBINED
SLUDGE
50 (
17 <
100 4
100 (
too <
30 (
47 <
SO (
100 (
too <
47 (
63 (
0 <
100 (
100 <
100 <
100 <
100 <
too <
40 (
33 (
63 (
100 <
47 <
100 (
100 (
63 <
100 (
0 (
0 <
0 <
100 (
100 <
0 (
0 <
0 (
100 (
33 <
0 (
0 <
40 (
17 <
30 (
0 (
0 (
0 <
0 <
33 (
63 (
0 <
33 (
4)
4)
4)
4)
3)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
3)
4)
4)
3)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4>
4>
4)
4>
4)
41
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
41
4)
3)
4>
4>
4>
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4>
4>
DIGESTED
SLUDGE
17
0
B3
30
33
0
30
SO
100
100
100
33
0
too
100
100
100
100
100
33
17
too
100
47
100
100
33
100
0
0
0
too
100
0
0
0
63
0
47
17
0
33
0
17
33
17
17
17
47
0
33
< 4>
( 4)
( 4)
( 4)
( 4>
< 4)
< 4)
( 4)
< 4)
( 4)
( 4>
( 4)
< 4)
( 4)
< 4>
< 4)
< 4>
( 4)
( 4)
( 41
( 4)
( 4)
< 4)
4 4)
< 4)
< 4)
< 4)
< 4)
( 4)
( 4)
< 4)
< 4>
( 4)
< 4>
< 4)
< 4)
( 4)
( 4)
< 4>
( 4)
< 4)
4 4)
( 4)
( 4)
4 4)
( 4)
< 4)
4 4>
4 4)
< 4)
4 4)
-------
PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF POLLUTANT PARAMETERS
PLANT 4
PARAMETER
3r 4-BENZOFLUORANTHENE
11r12-BENZOFLUORANTMENE
CHRY6ENE
ACENAPHTIIYLENE
FLUORENE
PYRENE
ALPHA-BHC
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUM
SELENIUM
INFLUENT
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
«>
4)
A)
4)
6)
A)
At
A)
At
A)
A)
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
0
0
O
0
At
A)
At
• At
61
At
At
At
At
t 61
I At
COMBINED
ELUDOE
17 <
17 (
33 (
0 <
33 (
83 (
0 (
100 <
100 (
100 <
100 (
At
At
6t
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
DIGESTED
SLUDGE
17 <
17 (
33 (
17 <
17 (
100 1
0 <
100. <
100 1
100 (
100 (
A>
4)
4)
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
oo
O
A
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED UERE HOT DETECTED AT ANY SAMPLE POINT
UNCONFIRMED PESTICIDES UERE ASSUMED NOT DETECTED
NUMBERS IN PARENTHESES ARE THE NUMBER OF SAMPLES TAKEN
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY-TO BE VERIFIED
-------
SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL [>ATA
PLANT 5
I RACIION
LONUENIIUNALS
NUN -C UNVEN TIONAL8
VOLATILEB
CO
tn
PARAMETER
bOU
TOTAL SUSP. SOLIDS
COb
OIL t GREASE
TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS
TOTAL DISS. SOLIDS
SEITLEADLE SOLIDS
TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDS
VOLATILE DISS. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOL. BUS. SOLIDS
AMMONIA NITROGEN
TUC
ilENZENE
CHLOftOBENZENE
1. l.l-TRICHLOROETHANE
l>If2.2-TETHACHLOROETHANE
2-CHLOftOETHYL VINYL ETHER
CHLOROFORM
1>I-DICHLOROETHYLENE
1r2-TRANS-DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPAME
1.3-DICHLONOPROPYLENE
ETHYLDENZENC
HETHYLENE CHLORIDE
HETHYL CHLORIDE
01 CIILOHObkOttOHE THANE
CHLOROll I BROHOHE THANE
TEIftACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
VINYL CHLORIDE
2i 4-OICIILOROPHENOL
2.4-DIHETHYLPHENOL
PENTACHLOROPHENQL
PHENOL
ACENAPHTMENE
1 ,2-DICHLOKOliENZENE
I ,4-OJCHl ONOB£N2£HE
F1UOMANTIIENE
NAPHTHA1 ENE
Dili (2 LTHYLHEXYL) PHTHALAIE
DUTVL bUUM PHTHALAIL
111 N-bUI YL PH1HAI ATE
DI N OCItl PHIIIALATE
DIE1HYL PHIHALAIE
(OltUIANrS NOT LISTED UEKE NEVER DETECTED
L tlSS THANi N-D NOT DETECTED)
IhELIHINARY DATA ONLY TO bt VERIFIED
ACID EXTRACT
UASE-NEUIfcALa
UNITS
NG/L
MO/L
HO/L
HG/L
UO/L
MO/L
MG/L
HL/L
HO/L
HO/L
HO/L
HO/L
HO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UQ/L
UO/L
UO/L
UG/L
UQ/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
INFLUENT
I
I
I
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
I 3D
147
374
33
30
86?
742
7
480
340
120
12
64
5
0
19
1
8
12
0
2
0
4
10
474
34
3
1
115
37
49
33
1
0
S
1
4
S
S
3
3
28
6
3
4
2
L
L
I
L
L
I
L
I
L
L
L
L
L
L
I
L
I
I
L
L
I
SECONDARY PCNT
EFFLUENT REN.
13
12
48
3
a
693
683
1
371
340
11
7
14
1
1
3
1
a
7
i
2
1
2
1
468
34
2
1
26
0
14
33
1
1
S
0
4
S
S
3
3
4
2
2
4
2
91
92
82
91
73
22
8
84
23
91
42
78
80
84
42
30
90
31
33
77
100
71
100
79
67
33
conn.
SLUDGE
13471
24433
33283
4168
?9
29864
3431
992
4S7
2424
19182
33
7327
42
N-D
N-D
40
N-6
2
22
1341
8
N-D
146
101
43
N-D
3
14
199
143
3292
N-D
N-D
N-D
27
20
3
13
N-D
118
3398
430
N-D
47
N-D
PIOESTEH
SLUDGE
3182
17438
12712
2746
238
18407
1016
860
161
339
8362
419
1273
5
1
2
43
0
6
N-D
22
N-D
N-0
73
11
9
N-0
1
N-D
124
2
117
4
N-D
i
48
13
N-D
6
10
32
4170
IS2
N-D
40
N-D
-------
SUHMARr OF ANALYTICAL DATA
PLANT 5
FRACTION
BASE-NEUTRALS
PESTICIDES
METALS
H-
A
NON-CONV. METALS
PARAMETER
ANTHRACENE
PMENANTMRENE
PTRENE
BETA-PMC
GAMMA-BHC
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
ZINC
ALUMINUM
BARIUM
CALCIUM
IRON
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
SODIUM
UNITS
UO/L I
UG/L L
UG/L I
NO/L L
NG/L I
UO/L L
UO/L I
UO/L
UO/L
UG/L
UO/L
UG/t
UO/L
UO/L
UG/L I
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
MG/L
UO/L
HO/L
UO/L
HG/L
INFLUENT
3
3
2
1000
1000
50
30
1
*
102
70
12
67
1?
50
23
24P
817
101
74
1S92
20
234
B9
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
L 3
L 3
L 2
12
55
L 50
L 50
L 2
1
35
31
5
4
L 10
I 50
2
44
155
54
70
274
27
203
87
PCNT
REM.
L
L
83
46
54
58
?4
17
91
73
81
47
5
77
4
13
2
COMB.
6LUDOE
92
92
10
1000
1000
55
78
4
385
8317
3000
221
8967
1077
S3
1103
23833
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
DIGESTED
SLUDGE
102
102
9
L 10OO
L 1000
52
49
4
312
7747
2747
28
9147
1240
41
BOO
241A7
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED MERE NEVER DETECTED
L-LESS THAM* N-D NOT DETECTED!
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY TO BE VERIFIED
-------
MASS BALANCE IN LB8. PER PAY
PLANT
FRACTION
CONVENTIONAL8
NON-CONVENTIONAL 8
VOLATILE8
PARAMETER
BOO
TOTAL SUSP. SOLIDS
COD
OIL I OREABE
TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS
TOTAL DI8S. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDS
VOLATILE DI68. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOL. BUS. SOLIDS
AMMONIA NITROOEN
TOC
BENZENE
CHLOftOBENZENE
If1rI-TRICHLOROETHANE
ltlt2>2-TETRACHLOROETHAHE
2-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER
CHLOROFORM
1.1-DICHLOROETHYLENE
li2-TRAN8-DICHLOROETHYLENE
1'2-DICHLOROPROPANE
1.3-DICHLOROPROPYLENE
ETHYL BENZENE
HETHYLENE CHLORIDE
HETHYL CHLORIDE
DICHLOROBROHOMETHANE
CHLORODIBROMOHE THANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
VINYL CHLORIDE
2.4-DICHLOROPHENOL
2.4-DIHETHYLPHENOL
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENOL
ACENAPHTHENE
I>2-DICHLOROBENZENE
I>4-DICHLORObENZENE
FLUORANTHENE
NAPHTHA! ENE
BI8(2-ETIIYI HEXYL) PHTHALATE
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALA1E
OI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-OC1YL PHIHALATE
DIETHYL PHtHAI ATE
t, LUNIl/llw IftEAIHENT SYSTEM ONLY
bl UDOE f-LOUS ADJUSTED TO APPHOXIHATE FLOU UNDEROOINO SECONDARY TRATMENT ONLY
COMBINED SLUDOE IS NOT INCLUDED IN TOTAL OUT COLUMN
POLLUTANIS NOT LISTED UERE NOT DETECTED
I -I ESS THAN! N-0 NOT DETECTED!
PKELININARY DATA ONLY---TO BE VERIFIED
ACID EXTRACT
bASE-NEUTRALB
INFLUENT
24890
24449
47323
3938
3.4
139934
133307
84343
44774
21391
2139
11433
1.0
L 0.1
3.4
.2
N-D
2.2
L 0.1
.4
I 0.1
.7
1.9
122
N-D
.3
.1
20.7
4.7
8.8
N-D
N-D
L O.I
N-D
.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
.4
3.0
1.0
.3
N-D
.3
TOTAL OUT
4755
24683
30294
4338
1 .8
131173
124339
44V8I
43222
13030
1912
4333
L 0.1
L 0.1
.3
L 0.1
L 0.1
1.3
N-D
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
.2
84.3
L 0.1
.4
.1
4.4
.3
2.3
.2
L 0.1
N-0
L 0.1
L O.I
L 0.1
N-D
1 0.1
I 0.1
t O.I
7.0
.2
N-D
L O.I
H-D
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
2249
2189
12293
4SO
1.4
123110
122921
44733
44714
2009
1319
2349
L 0.1
1 0.1
.3
N-D
N-D
1.3
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
84.3
N-D
.4
.1
4.4
L O.I
2.3
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
L O.I
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-0
1 .1
N-D
N-D
N-D
H-D
DI8ESTED
SLUDGE
4304
24494
18001
3888
,4
24043
1438
228
308
11841
393
1804
L 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
L O.I
t O.I
N-D
t 0.1
N-D
N-D
.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
N-D
L 0.1
N-D
.2
I 0.1
.2
L 0.1
N-D
1 0.1
L 0.1
1 0.1
N-0
L 0.1
L 0.1
I 0.1
3.9
.2
N-D
I 0.1
N-D
COMBINED
SLUDGE
11749
19817
24452
3139
L 0.1
22389
2372
492
1819
14380
23.9
3443
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
O.I
N-D
N-D
0.1
N-0
O.I
O.I
1.2
0.1
N-D
.1
0.1
0.1
N-D
0.1
0.1
,1
.1
2.3
N-D
N-D
H-D
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
N-0
O.I
2.7
.3
N-0
0.1
N-D
-------
MASS BALANCE IN IBS, PER DAY
PLANT 5
FRACTION
BASE-NEUTRALS
PESTICIDES
HETALB
NON-CONV. HETALB
p-
M^l
^^^
A
PARAMETER
ANTHRACENE
PHENANTHRENE
PYRENE
BETA-BHC
OAHHA-BHC
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUH
CADHIUH
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
ZINC
ALUMINUM
BARIUM
CALCIUM
IRON
MAGNESIUM
MANOAHEBE
SODIUM
INFLUENT TOTAL
N-D
N-D
N-D L 0.
M-D L 0.
N-D L 0.
N-D L 0.
N-D 1 0.
.2 L 0.
SECONDARY
OUT EFFLUENT
N-D
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
DIGESTED
SLUDOE
L 0
N
.1
.1
•1
-D
N-D
L 0
L 0
L 0
1.0 .5* .1
16.4 17.3 4.3
12. 7.3 3.4
2. .7 .7
12. 13.7 .7
2. 1.8 N-D
N- 1 0.
I N-D
4.2 1.4 .3
44. S 44.0 11.8
147
18.1
13223
213
4748
42,2
14014
27.7
9.4
12333
47.2
4748
34.4
13484
It
3
L 0
13
1
L 0
1
34
NOT
NOT
NOT
NOT
NOT
NOT
NOT
.1
.1
.1
,4
.0
.7
.1
.0
.8
.1
.1
.2
RUN
RUN
RUN
RUN
RUN
RUN
RUN
COMBINED
SLUDGE
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
0.1
0.1
0.1
N-D
N-D
0.1
0.1
0.1
.3
6,2
2.2
.2
A. 7
.8
0.1
17.7
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
SECONDARY TREATMENT SYSTEM ONLY
SLUDOE FLOWS ADJUSTED TO APPROXIMATE FLOU UNDERGOING SECONDARY TRATMENT ONLY
COMBINED SLUDOE IS NOT INCLUDED IN TOTAL OUT COLUMN
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED HERE NOT DETECTED
L-LE8S THAN) M-D NOT DETECTEDI
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY TO BE VERIFIED
-------
PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF POLLUTANT PARAMETERS
PLANT 5
CT
A
PARAMETER
llENZENE
I p1.1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CHLOROFORM
1,2 TRANS -bICHLOROEIHYLENE
ElHYLbENZENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
blClll QRObROMOME THANE
TEIKACHLOROETHVLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
bIS<^-ETIIYLHEXYL> PHTHALATE
bUIYL BENZYL PHIHALATE
CAliniUH
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
SILVER
I INC
PHENOL
I,3-UICHLOROFROPYLENE
NAPHTHALENE
BI-N-bUIYL PHIHALATE
DIETUYL PHTHALATE
NICKEL
I . 1 • 2.2- IE TRACIILOROC THANE
CHLORObJBROHOHETHANE
2t 4-bIHETHYLPIIENOL
KERYLL1UH
CHLOROBENZENE
1.1-KICHI OROETHYLENE
1 , 2 DICIIl OROPKOPANE
2 CIILOROETHYL UINYL ETHER
HtTIIVL CHLORIDE
VINYL CHLORIDE
2. V DICIH OROCHENOL
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
ACENAPHTHENE
1.2 DICHLORObENZENE
1 , 4-IilCHLOROElENZENE
fLUORANTUENE
Ul-N-OCIYL PHTHALATE
ANIHRACENE
PHENANIHKENE
PYKENE
bt TA-bllC
linttHrt UIIC
AMIIHONY
AKtiLNIC
btlENIUH
POIIIIIANIS NOT LISlEli UEKE NOT IiETECTLb AT ANY SAMPLE POINT
UNLONMRhED PESTICIDES UEKE ASSUMED NOT DETECTED
NUHtitKS IN PARENTHESES ARE THE NUHbER OF SAMPLES TAKEN
IhtllHINAKV DATA ONLY-TO BE VERIFIED
INFLUENT
100
too
100
too
too
too
too
too
too
too
too
too
too
too
too
too
too
100
100
63
67
so
so
so
50
33
33
33
33
17
17
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4>
4)
A)
4>
4>
4>
4)
At
4>
6)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
A)
4)
4)
A)
A)
A)
41
4)
A)
A)
A)
A)
4)
A)
A)
A)
A)
4)
A)
A)
A)
A)
6)
4>
A >
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
SO
47
too
0
33
too
63
too
33
too
100
0
17
100
100
63
17
33
100
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
33
0
0
33
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
so
0
0
0
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4>
4)
4>
4)
4>
4>
4»
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4>
4)
4>
4>
4>
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
COHblNEb
SLUDGE
too (
0 <
33 (
100 (
100 <
63 (
0 <
33 (
100 <
63 (
100 <
33 <
100 (
100 <
100 <
too <
100 <
100 <
100 <
33 <
0 (
SO (
0 (
0 (
100 (
20 4
20 <
0 (
too <
0 <
33 1
33 <
0 (
100 (
SO (
0 (
0 <
17 <
17 <
33 <
0 <
33 (
47 (
47 (
33 (
0 <
0 (
40 (
100 (
too <
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
41
4)
4)
4)
4>
4>
4)
S>
3)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4>
4>
4)
4)
4)
3)
4)
4)
DIGESTED
SLUDGE
47
17
33
63
100
63
0
0
100
33
100
17
100
100
100
100
too
100
100
17
0
33
0
0
too
75
17
0
100
17
0
0
17
47
17
17
17
33
0
17
17
17
63
63
17
0
0
too
too
too
< 4)
( 4)
< 4)
( 4)
( 4)
< 4)
( 4)
( 4)
( 4>
I 4)
( 4>
< 4)
< 4)
< 4)
< 41
< 4)
< 4)
( 4>
< 4>
1 4)
< 4>
( 4)
4 4)
( 4)
< 4)
< 4>
< 4)
( 4)
< 4)
( 4)
< 4)
< 4>
< 4)
< 4)
< 4)
< 4)
( 4)
( 4)
< 4)
< 4)
< 4)
( 4)
< 4)
( 41
( 4)
( 4)
( 4)
< 4)
< 4)
< 4)
-------
SUMHAFY UF ANALYTICAL DATA
(•LiNT 6
FKACT1UN
CONVENTIONAL*
NON-CONVbNTIONALS
VOLATILES
«>
o
PARAMETER
600
TOTAL SUSP. SOL I OS
COD
OIL t GREASE
TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS
TOTAL OISS. SULIOS
SETILEAOLE SOLIDS
TOTAL VOLATKc SULILS
VOLATILE D1SS. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOL. SUS. SOLIDS
AMMONIA NITRUliEN
TOC
DEN/tNE
CARBON TETKACIILUKlDE
CHLOROOEN2CNE
i2-01CHLOROETHANE
, 1,1-TRICIILURUETHANE
.1-OICIILURObTHANt
,l,2-TRICIILOHOfc!MAf.[
, 1,2.2-ILIRACHLOKUEIHAIIE
HLOROE TrIANL
HLOKOFOMM
.1-DICHLOROETHYLENt
(2-TRANS-DlCHLORUEThYLENt
ETHYL3ENZENL
METHYLENE CHLJftlOL
METHYL CHLUKIOE
01CriLOROHROMOME THANt
TR1CHLOROFLUOKOHETHANE
TLTRACHLOKOEIHYLCNE
TOLUENE
TRICHLUKULIHYLENt
VIMYL CHLOBIDU
PARACHLOROMETA CKESUL
2>4-OICHLUPOPHEt.L'L
PENTACHLORUPHCKUL
PHENOL
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED HERE NEVER CEUCltL
L-LESS THANI N-0 NOI DETECIEDI
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY- TO BE VERIFIED
ACIO EXTRACT
uum
MG/L
hG/L
MG/L
MC-/1
UG/L
HO/L
MG/L
UL/L
MG/L
M&/L
IfC/L
MG/L
Mt/L
UG/l
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UC/L
L'G/L
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UC/L
LG/L
H.fLULNI
26)
632
90
1
3i
33
1
6
y
1V1
467
IC96
9
1
IS
1
SICUNUARY
EFFLUCNT
18
^7
131
t
38
683
646
17
1)^
117
lu
12
»0
0
L 2
L 1
1
47
1
I I
L 1
I IS
3
0
9
I 1
23
L 34
0
6
a
i)
b4
101
1
L 1
2
0
(>CrU
KLH.
93
>6
rt<,
•)6
08
•>o
5
•17
(I
27
97
40
90
100
91
()•>
')8
50
100
n
38fc
4936
4672
53717
4bl8
1625
4139f.
36i
41017
62
24006
12
10
G
N-0
33
212
N-D
N-0
167
N-0
N-D
t)7B
317
64
N-0
N-D
N-0
51'
475
32
J40GO
N-0
N-t,
h-D
Kti'ti
UIGtSUI!
SlUPGt
lt>B56
4775d
51 7(17
494H
7420
49232
114J
1775
37662
445
37250
585
25625
11
M-D
0
N-0
N-0
N-0
h-\l
1
1800
N-0
N-U
116
392
I.-U
1833
-------
SUIIHAfcY lif ANALYTICAL LAlA
HANI t>
fRACIlON
BASE-NEUTRALS
H
!f*
/I
MLIALS
NON-CUNV. MLtALS
PAKAH£I£R
ACCNAPilIHENt
1 ,3-OICHLOkQbEN^uht
1.1-OltHLOKUBtNjENl
2.1-OINItRQTOLUtNt
NAPHHULEHL
BlS(2-ETIIKLHtXYL) HHIHALAU
BUTYL BEN/YL PKIHALAIE
OI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
OlETMYL PHIIIALATE
CHRYSENE
ANTHRACENE
1.12-bENZQPERYLENE
FLUORENE
PIIENANIHRElJt
AN 1 1 HOMY
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
GIROHIUH
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
ScLENIUM
SILVER
ZINC
ALUMINUM
BARIUM
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE'
SOOIUM
(Hi I T S
UU/l
UG/L
UG/L
tu/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/l
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
LG/L
UG/L
UG/L
NG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
hG/L
UG/L
hC/L
UG/L
UC/L
INILJuM
1
3
1
1
1
61
L 5
38
16
I 5
I 5
52
6
L 5
52
I 5G
I 50
L £
1076
I3'>0
76G
19S
3233
701
L 50
15
i3to
302
56
7363
15
265
111
SECLNIURY
CFeLUEliI
1
L 1
L 1
1
L 2
9
0
11
2
1
1
11
1
0
11
L 50
L 50
L 2
65
62
17
3U1
1U
200
291
L 50
3
175
131
31
1b
121
13
151
131
£i!!
67
U6
71
i>7
11
d3
79
91
96
91
91
91
56
uO
90
-M
90
lu
91
1 i
,7
5
PKIMAxY
S4.UOGL
N-0
IJ-0
N-C>
U-J
N-3
'.200
1500
513
N-0
565
5t>5
1505
N-G
N-0
1505
393
313
11
8250G
71333
51333
2<123
Iol67
601611
1700C
lt>^
t23
36G6t 7
NOT KUN
1.01 RUN
NCI tUN
(JOT I-UU
NOT fU<4
NOT KUN
NOT RUN
CIG.STll.
SLU'J&E
N-0
N-0
N-0
N-li
(I-U
108b
N-0
N-0
N-0
12
62
99^
N-0
N-0
991
3'-U
212
9
79b33
73033
16O30
17597
966?
1U666f
17500
152
802
365000
NUT RUN
NOT HUN
NUI KUN
i;ci KUN
NUI RUN
NOI RUN
NOT RUN
NUT LISTED hJLKt NLVLK DC It L HO
L-LCSS lilAN) N-D NUT ULILCUUI
I'KtLIMINAKY HAIA ONLY- 10 8E VERIFIED
-------
MASS BALANCE IN IBS. PER DAY
PLANT 4
FRACTION
CONVENTIONAL8
NON-CONVENTIONALS
VOLATILEB
PARAMETER
BOD
TOTAL SUSP. SOLIDS
COD
OIL I GREASE
TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS
TOTAL DI88. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDS
VOLATILE DI88. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOL. BUS. SOLIDS
AHHONIA NITROGEN
TOC
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
CHLORODENZENE
1>2-DICHLOROETHANE
1.1t1-TRICHLOROETHANE
Irl-DICHLOROETHANE
1f1r2-TRICHLOROETHANE
1t1i2r2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
CHI.OROETHANE
CHLOROFORM
Irl-DICHLOROETHYLENE
lr2-TRAN3-DICHLOROETHYLENE
ETHYLBENZENE
HETHYLENE CHLORIDE
HETHYL CHLORIDE
DICHLOROBROHONETHANE
TRICHLOROFLUOROHETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
VINYL CHLORIDE
PARACHLOROHETA CRE80L
2.4-DICHLOROPHENOL
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENOL
ACENAPHTHENE
1t3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1t 4-DICHLOROBENZENE
2r4-DINITROTOLUENE
NAPHTHALENE
BIS<2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
1,2-BENZANTHRACENE
PRIMARY SLUDOE IB NOT INCLUDED IN TOTAL OUT COLUMN
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED MERE NOT DETECTED
L-LEB9 THANI N-D NOT DETECTED)
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY TO BE VERIFIED
ACID EXTRACT
BASE-NEUTRALS
INFLUENT
13447
37140
53141
3184
10.2
80349
37844
39944
9439
31149
1157
22945
L 0.1
H-D
N-D
.4
24.3
.5
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
.3
2.3
2.1
L 0.1
1.9
2.0
L 0.1
.3
.3
11.2
29. «
99.9
.3
L 0.1
.9
L 0.1
L 6,
,
L 0.
L 0.
L 0,
3.8
N-D
2.2
.9
N-D
TOTAL OUT
3605
8729
15449
869
3.3
47320
38143
13390
4948
£463
794
4173
L 0.1
N-D
L 0.1
L 0.1
2.8
L 0.1
N-D
L 0.1
.3
.2
L 0.1
.4
L 0.1
1.3
N-D
t O.I
.4
t 0.1
1.3
3.8
11.0
L 0.1
N-D
L 0.1
.3
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
I 0.1
N-D
1.1
I 0.1
.4
.1
L O.I
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
1078
1568
7704
127
2.2
40138
37972
7743
6881
1078
706
2333
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
2.8
I 0.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
.2
L 0.1
.4
N-D
1.3
N-D
I 0.1
.4
i 0.1
1.2
3.8
3.9
L 0.1
N-D
L 0.1
L 0.1
L 0,1
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
N-D
.3
L 0.1
.4
.1
L 0.1
DIGESTED
SLUDGE
2527
7141
7763
742
1.1
7382
171
5447
46.7
5583
87.7
3842
L 0.1
N-D
L O.I
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
.3
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
L 0.1
I 0.1
3.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
.3
H-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
.6
N-D
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
PRIMARY
SLUDGE
5455
15396
14609
1496
1.4
14109
1383
12415
114
12300
24.3
7200
L
L
L
t
L
I
I
L
I
L
O.I
0.1
O.I
H-D
0.1
0.1
N-D
N-D
0.1
N-D
N-D
.3
O.I
0.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
O.I
.1
O.I
10.2
N-D
N-D
N-D
.3
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N^D
1.4
.4
.2
N-D
.2
-------
MASS BALANCE IN LBS. PER DAY
PLANT 4
FRACTION
llASE-NEUTRALS
ME ML B
NOH-C0NU. METALS
8
PARAMETER
CHRYSENE
ANTHRACENE
I.I2-BENZOPERYLENE
FLUORENE
PHENANTHRENE
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
ZINC
ALUMINUM
BARIUM
CALCIUM
IRON
MAGNESIUM
MANOANEBE
SODIUM
INFLUENT
N-D
3.0
.]
N-D
3.0
N-D
N-D
N-D
43.3
81.8
44.7
3.8
11.7
.2
41.2
N-D
,y
290
140
17.8
3284
433
882
14. 8
8312
TOTAL OUT
1
L
L
I
L
L
I
L
0. 1
.7
0. 1
0.1
.7
0.1
O.I
0.1
13.8
14.7
9.7
23.3
2.3
O.I
19.9
0.1
.3
82.4
_
-
-
_
-
-
-
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
L 0.1
.4
L 0.1
L 0.1
.4
N-0
N-D
N-D
3.8
3.4
2.8
22.9
1.1
L O.I
17.3
N-D
.2
27. V
7.9
1.8
2723
24.8
743
8.9
7841
DIGESTED
SLUDOE
t 0.1
.1
N-D
N-D
. 1
I 0.1
I O.I
I 0.1
12.0
11.1
4.9
2.4
1.4
L O.I
2.4
L O.I
.1
34.7
NOT RUN
MOT RUM
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
MOT RUN
NOT RUN
MOT RUN
PRIMARY
SLUDOE
.2
.3
N-D
N-0
.5
t 0.1
I O.I
24.7
22.9
19.4
A. 6
4.8
.2
S.I
L 0.1
.2
114
MOT RUM
MOT RUN
MOT RUM
NOT RUN
MOT RUN
NOT RUN
HOT RUM
PK1HARY BlUDOt IS NOT INCLUDED IN TOTAL OUT COLUMN
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED
I I ESS THAN! N-D NOT DETECTED*
PHELIMINARY DATA ONLY TO BE VERIFIED
-------
PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF POLLUTANT PARAMETERS
PLANT A
I I
PARAMETER
J.2-TRANB-DICHLOROETHYLENE
METIIYLENE CHLORIDE
METHYL CHLORIDE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
VINYL CHLORIDE
PENTACHLOROPHENOL ,
DIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL> PHTHALATE
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
SILVER
ZINC
1r1r1-TRICHLOROETHANE
Irl-DICHLOROETHANE
CHLOROFORM
ANTHRACENE
PHENANTHRENE
BENZENE
If1-DICHLOROETUYLENE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
PARACHLOROHETA CREBOL
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
1r2-DICHLOROETHANE
ETHYLBENZENE
DICHLOROBROMOMETHANE
PHENOL
1 rl.2-TRICHLOROETHANE
2r4-DICHLOROPHENOL
ACENAPHTHENE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1r 4-DICHLOROBENZENE
2.4-DINITROTOLUENE
NAPHTHALENE
1>12-BENZOPERYLENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
CHLOROBENZENE
1r1F2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
1,2-BENZANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE
FLUORENE
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED UERE NOT DETECTED
UNCONFIRMED PESTICIDES UERE ASSUMED NOT
NUMBERS IN PARENTHESES ARE THE NUMBER OF
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY-TO BE VERIFIED
INFLUENT
100 < A)
too < A>
100 ( 6)
too ( A>
ipo
100
100
too
too
100
100
100
100
too
100
loo
100
100
63
83
83
83
83
47
A7
67
67
67
50
33
33
33
33
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4)
4)
A)
4)
4)
«>
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
6)
4)
4)
6)
4>
4)
A)
4)
4)
A)
4)
4>
4)
6)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
6)
A)
4)
A)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
A)
4)
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
100
too
0
33
100
100
100
33
B3
100
100
too
67
67
83
100
17
100
too
47
100
83
83
17
17
83
50
50
83
17
0
33
33
0
0
SO
0
0
33
0
17
0
0
0
0
17
33
33
17
0
4)
4)
4)
6)
4)
A>
4)
A)
4)
4)
4)
61
A)
4)
4)
A>
4)
A)
A)
A)
*>
4>
A)
4)
6}
A)
4)
A)
4)
4)
4)
6)
4)
4)
6)
4)
4)
A)
A>
6)
4)
6}
A)
A)
A)
A)
A)
A)
6)
.4)
0 ( 4)
PRIMARY
SLUDGE
47
A7
0
100
100
83
too
0
100
100
100
too
100
100
too
100
100
100
33
83
0
100
100
100
0
o
0
o
47
Q
100
0
100
0
0
o
Q
0
o
0
0
17
17
0
17
83
too
100
0
100
too
A)
4)
A>
4)
4)
4)
A)
4)
A)
A)
4)
A)
6)
4>
A)
4)
4)
4)
4)
A)
A)
A)
4)
4)
4)
A)
A)
4)
A)
A)
4)
A)
4)
4)
A)
A)
A)
A)
4)
4)
A)
A)
4)
4>
4)
A)
A)
4)
4)
4)
A)
DIGESTED
SLUDGE
100 ( A)
83 ( A)
0 ( 4)
100
100
33
100
0
100
100
100
too
100
100
100
100
too
100
0
0
0
80
80
A7
0
0
0
0
0
0
too •
0 '
A)
A)
4)
4)
A)
S)
A)
A>
A)
A)
A)
A>
A)
A)
4>
A)
A)
A)
S>
5)
A)
A)
A)
A>
5)
5)
A)
A>
A)
100 ( A)
0 ( A)
0 ( 6)
0 ( 5)
0
o
0
0
Q
0
17
17
47
Q
20
20
0
100
100
3>
5)
5>
5)
5)
A)
A>
A)
A)
5)
5)
5)
3)
A)
A)
CTED AT ANY 8AHPLE POINT
NOT DETECTED
ER OF SAMPLES
TAKEN
-------
PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF POLLUTANT PARAMETERS
PLANT 6
SECONDARY PRIMARY DIGESTED
PARAMETER INFLUENT EFFLUENT SLUDG? SLUDGE
bERYLLIUM 0 < 4) 0 (4) 100 ( 4) 100 ( 4)
SELENIUM 0 < 4) 0 (4) 106 ( 4) 100 < 4)
to
en
IOLLUTANIS NUI LISTED UERE NOT DETECTED AT ANY SAMPLE POINT
UNCONFIRMED PESTICIDES UERE ASSUMED NOT DETECTED
NUHIfEfvS IN PARENTHESES ARE HIE NUMKER OF SAMPLES TAKEN
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY'TO BE VERIFIED
-------
SUWAKY IF ANALYIIC/.L UATA
FRACTION
CONVENTIOHALS
NON-CONVENTIONALS
P-
A
VOLATILES
PARAMETER
(500
TOIAl SUSP. SJL1CS
COD
OIL t GRLASL
TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS
TOTAL DISS. SULIOi
SETTLtAGLL SOLIDS
TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDS
VOLATILE UISS. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOL. SUS. SCLIDS
AflHUHIA NllRbGEN
IOC
BENZENE
CHLOROBENZENE
,1,1-TRICHLURUETHANt
• 1-OICHLDKOtfHAr.l
,1,2,2-TETRACIILCf.OCTHANt
HLOROFORH
.Z-TRANS-UICHLOROiTNYLtNt
•2-OICHLORCPROPANE
,3-OICHLOfiOPROPYLtNE
ETHYLBtHZENE
MEIHYLENE CMLJRIut
OICHLOKOOIFLUURUMETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLtNE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHYLENL
PENTACHLOKCiPriENOL
PHENUL
1.2-DICHLOR03ENZEHE
1,3-DICHLUROBENZENL
H-OKMLUHOuEHZbNE
FLJORANTHENl
NAPHTHALENE
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTLD JERE NEVER OEIhtlEO
L-LESS THAN! N-U NOT DETECTED!
ACID EXTRACT
BASE-NEUTRALS
UIJITS
KI-/L
•10 /L
HG/L
IIG/L
UG/L
l!b/L
Ht/L
^L/L
HG/L
Mt/L
HG/L
KG/L
HG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/l
UL-/L
L.G/L
UG/L
UG/l
tO/L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
LG/L
UL/L
CG/L
UG/L
UG/L
Ul/L
UG/L
LG/L
INILUfllT
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
If.
135
320
41
55
Uli
7ie
j
32V
225
1U5
13
c5
1
5
49
1
«i
5
2
5
5
22
36
5
15
15
17
27
15
3
11
11
5
U
L
I
I
t
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
StCl'IOAKY PCtl! CDMPlNED
EFHUENT KIM. bLUOGt
13
11
"*
0
f)4 >
•33 1
1
234
271
1*
H
'*
5
5
7
5
5
1
>
5
5
5
23
5
3
1
*
251
jth)
11
11
11
U
11
33 27'ib4
"7 35057
70 520U1
7H 7933
J5 1133
2 41246
*26i:
t.7 670
14 27934
2243
l>7 22103
257
b3 9050
V5
b
dh H-D
352
it
JO 7
1517
N-U
(J.-D
n 2100
3t B
32
10 1
•13 4615
76 2
1000
173
233
35
2b
143
Ib3
MEftT
TREATED
SLUPOE
26 >l J
5 7 Ji2
960^
3512
34 >23
9'j7fc
34i
23131
7551
15217
51->
U433
507
1
M-3
M-i>
tl-'J
N-0
2H3
b
55
4fc>
1
11-11
15
2343
7
N-U
1717
50
N-n
10
li
lu
L
I
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
I
L
L
L
ME/11
IKLAlMtl.T
UlC UN 1
2 3 7*7 *
20110
53J
4122
1 'i 1 1 1
1 12 M
33
11 4 Jt
9IJ61
lbI5
433
(>7b7
it,
0
5
5
i
3
t
'j
5
13
3a
^
5
03
5
250
907
17
100
1OG
50
2
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY- TO BE VERIFIED
-------
OF ANALYTICAL OAlA
PL Aid 7
FRACTION
BASE-NEUTRALS
C/I
Co .3
HEULS
PArfAHLTEK
blS(2-ElHYLHLXrL) f-MlMALAU
dill If L bCUm HHIHALAlt
01-N-bUlYL HlllHALiU
OltTHYL ClllhALAU
CHRYSENE
ANrilkACLNL
PHEHtNIHrtll.l
PYRENE
HEPIACHLOK
IIEPIACHLOR LHuXIUL
CAHHA-bllC
UELIA-tHC
AhllHONY
ASSCN1C
atliYLLIUH
CADMIUM
CYANIDE
LEAO
HEKCUHY
NICKEL
SILVER
IUALL1UH
I INC
ALUMINUM
AAKIUH
NUN-CCNV. HE I XLS
CALCIUM
COUALI
IKOU
rtAGHt SUM
MANuANC SL
MJLYUUEUUM
I'UILUIANIj NUT IISIEO rftKE NEVLR utllL
I -LESS lilAhi N-0 NJT OEIELTlUi
CKILIHINARY DATA ONLY- TO 1IE VER1FIEI)
Oil ITS
UC/L
LC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
NC/L
NC/L
liC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UL/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
NC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
L.C/L
UC/L
CC/L
UC/L
UC/L
MC/L
UC/L
UC/L
MC/L
UC/t
U,/L
INILUihT
217
7
3
7
L 5
L 5
L 11
L 11
L 5
417
b3
SCO
U3
6
L 3
0
5
223
42
72
loco
345
I 3
5
L 25
61V
164
t>4
J5 >l
74
11
3463
20
62
17
L
L
E
L
L
L
L
L
I
L
L
L
I
SECONDARY f'CNT
Ef-l-LUENT <•)
11
11
11
5
5
11
11
5
1000
83
iOO
1000
3 ?0
3
3
i,
52 L'2
39 J3
24 4)
4J 35
1JOC
325 a
3
1 •».>
25
lOd 33
J7 ul
23 13
/!»»
72 3
10 9
40 / 1)6
IS 5
60 3
I'j 12
COMBINED
SLUOCE
11257
1162
31C
N-D
153
153
t-7
l>27
160
L 1000
L 1000
L 1000
L 1000
1403
332
L 10
*99
72667
45633
2503
44167
2050CO
27333
lij
111
I 10
12b333
NUl KUN
KOI KUN
KOI kUN
NUT KUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
f.OI KUN
I.UT KUN
U3I KUI4
HEAT
TREATED
SLUDGE
IU117
731. I
2oS L
N-D L
25 L
25 L
iu7 L
407 L
14 L
L 1000
I 1060
I 1030
L 1COO L
1C4I
207
I 10
31 J
rj<, >OC
35333
27H
6133
140500
2ou67
S3
Ib5
t lu
9fcli33
NUl HUM
UUI KUU
KCT KJN
NOT KUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
hOI KUN
Nbl Kbit
NiJI KLjl,
HEAT
IrfcAIMLNT
DECANI
HID
100
100
100
50
50
IvIJ
100
50
333
63
167
1000
54
56
1
139
956f<
5701
49
171U
1000
9330
l>
t 7
52
32602
15523
935
1005
3ob
190
<. 601-1
10
1104
154
-------
5UMIIARY OF ANALYTICAL OAtA
PLANT I
FRACTION
NON-CONV. HLIALS
PARAHETEK
SODIUM
UN
TITANIUM
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
UN I T S
INUUtUT
SELLHUARY
EFFLUtNT
I>CWT
'(EM.
COMUINEO
SLUOCE
HEAT
TREATED
SLUM3E
lit* I
ISEATMtNT
UECANl
Mi./L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
131
23
7
13J
13
t
'(3
It'JT KUIt
NUT MJti
NUT KUN
NOT KUN
NOT RUN
NCT KUN
NOT HL'J
NOT KUN
NUT F:UN
NOT RUN
.'91
171
1U
00
POLLUTANTS NUT LISTED MERE NEVER JEIECTLD
L-LESS THANI N-D NOT DETECTtDk
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY- TO BE VERIFIED
-------
MASS BALANCE IN LBS. PER DAT
PLANT 7
FRACTION
CONUENTIONAL8
NON-CONVENTIONAL8
UOLATILE8
ci
A
10
us
ACID EXTRACT
BASE-NEUTRALS
jl 1C IlitS
PARAMETER
BOD
TOTAL SUSP. SOLIDS
COD
OIL I GREASE
TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS
TOTAL DISS. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOLAIILE SOLIDS
VOLATILE DISS. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOL. BUS. SOLIDS
AMMONIA NITROGEN
TOC
BENZENE
CHLOROBENZEME
>IfI-TRICHLOROETHANE
fI-OICHLOROETHANE
• If 2t2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
CHLOROFORM
.2-TRANS-DICHLOROETHYLENE
>2-DICHLOROPROPANE
.3-DICHLORQPROPYLENE
ETHYLBENZENE
HETIirLENE CHLORIDE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENOL
I>2-DICHLOROBENZENE
I>3-DICHLOROBENZENE
I.4-OICHLOROBEMZENE
FLUORANTHENE
NAPHTHALENE
BIS<2-ETHYLHEXYL> PHTHALATE
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
I.2-BENZANTHRACENE
CIIRYSENE
ANTHRACENE
PIIENANTHKENE
PYRENE
HEI-TACHI OK
HEPTACHLOR tPOX I HE
INFLUENT
46330
34318
132922
14394
22.3
348970
290474
133327
91021
42304
3040
24180
.3
N-D
19.7
.3
N-D
1.9
.8
N-D
N-D
8.8
14.3
N-D
4.2
4.2
4.9
N-D
3.9
1.4
N-D
N-D
N-D
3.4
87.7
2.7
1 .0
2.7
N-D
N-D
N-Ii
N-D
N-D
.2
L 0.1
TOTAL OUT
124447
151127
252939
34532
7.9
310270
351219
228744
117814
94192
4473
44733
,4
L 0.1
2.7
1.4
. 1
.3
7.4
N-D
N-D
8.4
9.4
.1
1.3
19.3
l.S
4.1
,7
1.0
.1
.1
.4
.7
82.3
4.8
1 .3
N-D
.4
.4
3.4
3.4
.7
N-D
L 0. I
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
11377
7140
39080
3747
3.2
340879
333718
114028
108407
3420
3420
9349
N-D
N-D
2.7
N-D
N-D
.3
1.2
N-D
N-D
N-D
9.4
N-D
1.3
.3
1.3
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
34.1
N-P
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
I O.I
COMBINED
SLUDOE
112870
143947
213879
32783
4.7
149391
17301
114718
9209
90772
1033
37144
.4
L 0.1
N-D
1.4
.1
L 0.1
4.2
N-D
N-D
8.4
t 0.1
.1
L O.I
19.0
L 0.1
4.1
.7
1.0
.1
.1
.4
.7
44.2
4.8
1.3
N-D
.4
.4
3,4
3.4
.7
N-D
N-D
MtAl TREATED SI IJDGE IS NOT INCLUDED IN TOTAL OUT COLUMN
IOILUIANIS NOT LISTED UERE NOT DETECTED
I LESS THAN) N-D NOT DETECTED!
TKELIH1NARY DATA ONLY TO BE VERIFIED
HEAT
TREATED
SLUDOE
43838
96499
16007
3.9
380M
15958
38337
12430
23331
639
14030
L
I
I
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
I
0.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
.3
O.I
0.1
0
• D
O.I
N-D
O.I
3.9
O.I
N-D
2.9
O.I
N-D
0.1
O.I
0.1
14.9
1.2
.4
N-D
O.I
O.I
.7
.7
O.I
N-D
N-D
-------
MASS BALANCE IN LB8. PER DAY
PLANT 7
FRACTION
PESTICIDES
METALS
NON-CONV, HETAL8
o
o
PARAMETER
GAMMA-BHC
DELTA-BHC
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
ZINC
ALUMINUM
BARIUM
BORON
CALCIUM
COBALT
IRON
HA8NE8IUN
HANOANE8E
MOLYBDENUM
SODIUM
TIN
TITANIUM
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
INFLUENT
.2
L 0.1
2.6
N-D
L 0.1
2.0
117
90.1
14.8
20.9
.4
139
N-D
2.1
2 SO
iee
33.9
307
29891
4.3
1402
8O29
24.9
4.7
32944
9.2
2.7
57. 3
1.3
TOTAL OUT
.2
N-D
6.9
1.4
1.0
4.1
319
204
20.0
200
1.2
242
.4
1.0
870
_
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
.2
N-D
1.1
N-D
1.0
2.1
20.7
1S.S
9.7
18.7
.4
130
N-D
.3
43.3
34.9
9.2
314
28773
4.1
144
7429
24.1
4.0
52129
3.3
1.4
33.0
1.1
COMBINED
SLUDGE
N-D
N-D
S.8
1.4
N-D
2.0
298
188
10.3
181
.8
112
.4
.7
327
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
HEAT
TREATED
SLUDGE
N-P
N-D
.3
N-D
.5
93 i 3
SB-,?
.5
10.2
.2
34.4
.2
.3
145
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
HEAT TREATED SLUDGE IS NOT INCLUDED IN TOTAL OUT COLUMN
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED
L-LESS TMANI N-D NOT DETECTED*
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY TO BE VERIFIED
-------
MASS BALANCE IN US. ft* DAI
THROUGH HEAT TREATMENT SYSTEM
PLANT 7
FRACTION
CONVENTIONALB
NON-CONVENTIONAL8
VOLATILEB
C/I
rj
A
ACIO EXTRACT
BASE-NEUTRALB
PESTICIDES
PARAMETER
BOD
TOTAL SUSP. SOLIDS
COD
OIL I GREASE
TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS
TOTAL DIS8. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDS
VOLATILE DIES. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOL. SUB. SOLIDS
AHHONIA NITROGEN
TOC
BENZENE
CHLOROBENZENE
r1-DICHLORGETHANE
.1.2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
HLOROFORH
f2-TRANB-DICHLOROETHYL£NE
> 2-DICHLOROPROPANE
, 3-DICHLOROPROPYLENE
EIHYLBENZENE
HCTHYLENE CHLORIDE
DICHLORODIFLUOROHETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENOL
I>2-DICHLOROBENZENE
I>J-OICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
FLUORANTHENE
NAPHTHALENE
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL> PHTHALATE
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATC
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
1.2-BENZANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE
ANTHRACENE
PHENAN1HRENE
PYRENE
HEPTACHLUR
liter AC HI OK tPOX IDE
GAMMA-bHC
COMBINED
SLUDGE
112870
143947
213879
32783
4.7
149391
17301
114718
9209
90772
1033
3714*
1 0.
1.
f
I 0.
4.
M-
N-
e.
L 0.
L 0.
19.0
L 0.1
4.1
.7
1.0
.1
.1
.4
.7
46.2
4.B
1.3
.4
.4
3.4
3.4
.7
N-D
N-D
N-D
TOTAL OUT
43142
44929
118109
14380
10.3
73182
28033
30891
23246
27087
1324
23470
.8
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
.9
1 0.1
I 0.1
.8
t O.I
N-D
t 0.1
4.0
L 0.1
N-D
3.9
.1
N-D
L O.I
L 0.1
L 0.1
18.3
1.2
.4
I 0.1
1 O.I
.7
.7
I O.I
L 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
HEAT
TREATED
SLUDGE
48334
43838
94499
14007
3.9
38014
13938
38337
12430
23331
839
14030
.0
I 0.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
,3
L 0.1
L 0.1
.a
L 0.1
N-D
L O.I
3.9
t 0.1
N-D
2.9
L 0.1
N-D
L 0.1
1 O.I
1 0.1
14.9
1.2
.4
I 0.1
I O.I
.7
.7
L O.I
N-D
N-D
N-D
HEAT
TREATMENT
DECANT
IS004
3091
21410
573
4.4
13148
12077
12334
10418
1734
443
9420
L 0.1
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
1.0
L O.I
N-D
N-0
N-D
L 0.1
1 .4
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
L O.I
L 0.1
I 0.1
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED UERE NOT DETECTED
L-IES8 THAN* N-D NOT DETECTED*
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY TO b£ VERIFIED
-------
MASS BALANCE IN LBS. PER DAY
THROUGH HEAT TREATMENT SYSTEM
PLANT 7
FRACTION
METALS
NON-CONV. HETALS
;• cc
A
PARAMETER
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
THALLIUM
ZINC
ALUMIHUH
BARIUM
BORON
CALCIUM
COBALT
IRON
MAGNESIUM
HANOANESE
MOLYBDENUM
SODIUM
TIN
TITANIUM
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
COMBINED
SLUDGE
3.8
1.4
N-D
2.0
298
189
10.3
>B1
.8
112
.6
,7
M-D
527
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
TOTAL OUT
1.8
.4
L 0.1
,4
103
45.0
.6
12.0
.2
43.0
.2
.3
L 0.1
200
_
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
HEAT
TREATED
SLUDGE
t .7
.3
N-D
.3
93.3
38.?
.3
10.2
.2
34.4
.2
.3
N-D
145
NOT-RUN
NOT-RUN
NOT-RUN
NOT-RUN
NOT-RUN
NOT-RUN
NOT-RUN
HOT-RUN
NOT-RUN
NOT-RUN
NOT-RUN
NOT-RUN
NOT-RUN
NOT-RUN
HEAT
TREATMENT
DECANT
L 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
.1
10.3
4,1
L 0.1
1.8
L 0.1
10.4
L 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
33.0
14.7
1.0
1.1
331
.2
49.3
73.2
1.2
.2
174
.4
.2
.7
L 0.1
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED
L-LESS THANI N-D NOT DETECTED!
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY TO BE VERIFIED
-------
PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF POLLUTANT PARAMETERS
PLANT 7
PARAMETER
1.1.1 TRICHLOROETHANE
t IHYLBENZENE
HETHYLENE CHLORIDE
TEIRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOI DENE
NAPHTHALENE
BIS<2-ETHYLHEXYL> PHTHALATE
GAMMA-BHC
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
MERCURY
ZINC
CHLOROFORM
1 . 2-TRAN8-DICt
33 < 6)
33 ( At
17 ( 4>
17 < 4)
17 < 4)
17 ( At
0 ( At
0 (A)
0 < At
0 t At
0 < At
0 < At
0 ( At
0 t At
0 (At
0 < At
0 (6)
0 (At
0 ( At
0 < At
0 (At
0 I At
0 (At
SECONDARY
EFFL
100 At
0 At
100 6t
83 At
33 At
0 At
100 At
100 At
100 At
63 At
83 At
100 At
100 At
SO At
A7 At
tOO At
0 At
0 At
63 At
03 At
33
A7
0
0
0
0
0
33
0
17
0
33
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
0 ( At
COMB.
SLDO
0 < At
83 < A)
too
17
100
33
100
0
too
100
100
100
100
t?
100
33
30
0
100
100
100
too
100
33
0
100
too
too
too
0
0
0
17
30
0
0
17
17
17
17
63
63
63
too
100
At
At
it
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
3)
At
At
At
I At
I At
At
I At
At
At
( At
63 < At
100 ( A)
100 < At
0 (At
HEAT
TREATED
SLUDGE
0 ( 4>
83 ( At
SO ( At
47 ( At
100 < At
17 < At
100 < 4>
0 < 4)
100 ( At
100 ( 4)
t OO < A t
100 4 At
100 < At
0 4 At
100 (At
SO ( 4)
83 < 4>
0 ( 4)
100 < At
100 < At
100 t At
100 < 4)
100 t At
17 ( 4)
0 < At
0 < 4)
63
too
63
0
0
0
17
0
60
17
0
0
0
17
17
17
17
100
100
17
100
100
4>
4)
4>
4>
4)
4)
At
S>
3)
At
At
At
At
1 4)
4)
At
At
At
( At
At
At
At
0 ( 4)
DECANT
0
too
33
0
100
17
too
33
too
too
too
63
too
0
too
0
100
A7
too
100
too
too
too
33
o
0
0
100
0
17
0
A7
n
0
Q
0
Q
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
A)
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
100 < 4)
100 ( At
-------
SUMHAHY OF ANALYTICAL OAIA
I'LAM
FRACTION PARAMETER
CONV. 800
TOTAL SUSP. SOLIDS
COO
OIL C CREASE
NUN-CONV. TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS
TOTAL OISS. SOLIDS
SETTLEABLE SOLIDS
TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDS
VOLATILE OISS. SOLIOS
TOTAL VOL. SUS. SOLIOS
AMMONIA NITROGEN
TUC
VOLATILES ACRYLONITR1LE
BENZENE
CHLOROUEHZENE
1>1 ,1-TRICHLUROtTHANE
1,1-OICHLOROETHANE
1,1,2-IRICHLORUETHANE
l,1.2,2-TETi«CHLORUETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
CHLOROFORM
1,1-OICHLOROETMYLENE
I,2-TRANS-OICHLOROUHYLtNE
1,2-OlCHLOkOPROPANl
ETHYLBENZENE
HETHYLENE CHLORIDE
METHYL CHLORIDE
METHYL BROMIDE
OICMLORUDIFLUOROMETHAIIE
TbTKACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLUROETHTLENE
VINYL CHLORIDE
ACIOS. 2,4-DICHLOR'JPHCNOL
PCNIACHLUROPHENOL
PHENOL
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED MERE NEVER DETECTED
L-LESS THANI N-0 NOT DETECTEm
PRELIMINARY PATA ONLY- TO BE VERIFIED
UN 1 T S
MC/L
MG/L
Mt/L
HC/L
UC/L
MG/L
MC/L
ML/L
Ml/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UL/L
UL/L
UC/L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
Uo/L
UC/l
L
I
L
L
I
t
I
I
L
L
I
INFLUENT
23b
i.05
5*4
US
7i
•Jib
723
4
453
3C9
144
Ifc
nt
IV
2
I
33
I
2
1
15
B
I
2
1
ie
J4
34
6
31
:«.
22V
3C
33
0
Ifc
9
L
L
L
L
L
L
I
L
L
L
L
L
L
I
SfcCOI.DAKY PCIH TMMARY
tHLULM KEM. SLUUGE
33
25
1&
5
5
t
3
5
2000
5
5
1259
2
>5->
5
5
5
VM
J
7635
5
250
N-D
823
610
55833
1B9IUO
293667
12375
7150
I94996
7553
Vti)
109432
5/33
102933
709
17333
165
773
33
13
I 1
I 5
li
L 5
L 5
5
eo3
3
l<6b
L 5
125
5
Ib93
2vJ
41575
105
L 5
N-0
1300
U3d
I
L
L
I
L
I
L
L
L
L
I
I
I
L
L
HEAT
TREATMENT
DECANT
9i7U
273
16333
31.
3200
10590
10317
1
£942
0774
172
900
f>767
19
«:2
1
J
1
2
1
15
1
1
2
1
7
19
34
6
30
2
1R25
2
33
6!)
334
-------
H> S
IMACIIUN PAKAMLICK
bAiL-NtUI. AtLNAHllllltNt
HLXtCMLQKObENlLNL
2-CilLDKU;uPHniALEtiL
I .2-OICHLOKUi)EN2CllL
1 ,i-01CHLOKObtia£HL
I ,4-OICMLURUbtNJENL
fLUUKANflltNt
tltXACIItJkObUrAOItrlt
NAPIIIHALLNt
ClS<<-LT!irLl!tX»L I PHIHALAR
UUTYL DtrUTL PHlMALAll
OI-N-bUIYL PHIHALA1L
OltrtUL PIIIHALAlE
OIHEIMYL PHIHALAU
1 ,2-ULN/ANlMKACtNE
HtlALi
CMRYSENE
ANlllKACtNt
PIltNANlHKLNc
PVRENL
ANIIMUNY
ARSENIC
btKVLLIUM
CAUH1UM
ClIKOHlUh
CUPPC4
ClTAIIlOt
LtAU
HLHCUKY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILYLP
ZINC
N-C HLIALS ALUHII.UH
LAMIUM
CALCIUM
IKON
MACNLSIUH
SUM
UMI i
UC/L
uC/L
Uu/L
UL/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
Ut/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
01 /L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
MC/l
UC/L
MC/L
hif
L
L
L
L
L
I
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
t
Y Gf At.AI
PLAN1
INFLUIM
»t
<,
j
4
2
1
1
t
It
^3
ic
2
2
t
3
25
3
2
2
3
5C
5C
2.
2
2tt
337
11
J50
417
M.
I;
17tt
li'/t
1J9
t>4
Isco
i;.
LYl
I
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
I
L
I
L
L
L
L
I
I
L
I
L
1CAL LilA
t
StCUI.uAKY
Iff LULlll
10
9
3
2
2
3
t
7
,
<,
t
j
^5
3
3
i
to
50
3
2
tt>
101.
6'j
92
67
68
64
74
43
45
92
71
(.3
66
t /
SLUUGE
N-i)
N-J
l.-u
N-U
N-U
(,-0
t)l7
r.-j
Ic33
17COO
34667
IOC 7
N-3
J17
433
N-u
433
550
£50
'A3
1277
1033
33
470
Ild667
14C667
i'7t 7
C5667
2COOOO
71003
t'33
»l 7
913333
K-U
K-t)
K-D
K-Ll
l.-l.
iLUuCL
1150
195
4 JO
230
475
325
oOO
6 75
1159
io?oo
1 7775
1045
^4-0
liu
7io
N-0
750
1505
1565
734
U15
695
22
*50
101250
120500
3340
93750
I725CO
oOOJO
17o
160
715000
N-0
N-U
14-0
n-0
N-U
lit A I
1KEATLU
SLUDCt
N-U
N-C
N-0
I.-U
N-J
N-0
577
N-u
fcb6
<.U200
33425
16i>6
N-0
N-u
I lrl
11
119
(.90
(.90
7c6
Itt25
1463
44
760
1'juODO
iU25uJ
1526
95250
105000
9200J
J2i
leu
1 jJt».00
N-D
N-0
N-D
N-'J
N-U
I
I
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
I
L
L
I
L
L
I
L
L
L
L
I
I
HEAT
TREATMENT
DECANT
10
9
'
-
2
2
3
b
2
b
3
3
4
L
'i
25
3
3
3
3
iuO
500
2
2
1155
212
44
192
225
6945
500
2
7495
1323
373
lie
1'MuC
Jj
NUI L1SILO HtKt NtVtK .iL
L-LtSS IMANI (1-0 HOI OLICCHUj
[IATA ONLY- TO HE VEKIFIE1I
-------
SUHM*KY UF ANALYTICAL (JAIA
PLAM f
FRACTION PARAMETER
— —---k-_ •»-»-•-»_»
N-C METALS HANGANESt
SODIUM
UNITS INFLUENT EFFLUENT
PCNT
RtM.
Ot/L
MO/L
1VO
lin
152
139
PklMARY
SLUDGE
H-U
N-D
SLUOGL
N-0
J-D
lit A I
TKtAltl/
SLUOGt
N-D
K-C
MEAT
TREATMENT
DECANT
97
A:
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED MERE NEVER OETECTtb
L-LESS THAN; N-O NOT DETECTED:
F-RELIMINARY DATA ONLY- TO SE VERIFIED
-------
MASS BALANCE IN LB8. PER DAY
PLANT B
ENACTION
CONVEMT10NAL8
NON-CONVENTIONALB
VOLATILES
CD
CO
A
ACID EXTRACT
BASE-NEUTRALS
PARAMETER
BOD
TOTAL SUSP. SOLIDS
COD
OIL I GREASE
TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS
TOTAL DIS8. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDS
VOLATILE DIBS. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOL. SU8. 80LID8
AMMONIA NITROGEN
TOC
ACRYLONITRILE
BENZENE '
CHLOMOBEN2ENE
111 »I-IRICHLOROETHANE
I.I-DICHLOROETHANE
If1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
I.1.2i2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
CHLOROFORM
1.1-DICHLOROETHYLENE
I.2-TRAN8-DICHLOROETHYLENE
1.2-01CHLOROPROPANE
ETHYLBENZENE
HETHYLENE CHLORIDE
METHYL BRONIDE
DICIILORODIFLUOROME THANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOftOETHYLENE
VINYL CHLORIDE
2•4-01CHLOROPHENOL
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENOL
ACENAPHTHENE
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
2-CHLORONAPHTIIAI ENE
lr2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1.3-OICHLOROBENZENE
1> 4-DICHLOROBENZENE
FLUORANTHENE
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
NAPHTHALENE
BI8(2-ETHYtHEXYl ) PHTHALATE
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
INFLUENT
43008
38802
103092
21841
13. A
173863
137061
63732
38463
27289
2937
22331
N-D
.3
N-D
6.2
.2
N-D
N-B
N-D
1.3
N-D
N-D
.2
2. B
2.6
N-B
N-D
4.9
43.3
S.6
N-D
L O.I
3.3
1.6
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
.2
N-D
2.3
6.3
9.3
.3
TOTAL OUT
4B64V
I2B209
217413
39368
6.0
247*81
133206
141028
34300
82138
4818
30302
I O.I
1.4
N-D
N-D
L O.I
t 0.1
N-D
3.0
2.1
N-D
1.9
I 0.1
.8
1.3
N-D
.7
L 0.1
66.0
I O.I
.4
I O.I
4.4
1.0
1.7
.3
.6
.4
.7
.3
.9
1 .0
1 .7
17.0
27.5
2.3
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
7843
13123
39984
2338
2.4
141373
128249
60737
30788
9949
3838
9760
N-D
1.4
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
2.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
.3
1.3
N-D
N-D
L O.I
34.6
L 0.1
N-0
L 0.1
3.2
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-0
N-D
N-D
1.3
.8
.7
COMBINED
SLUDGE
40784
113086
177429
34810
3.4
124408
4957
80291
3312
72189
980
20742
L 0.1
L O.I
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
L O.I
N-D
3.0
N-D
N-D
1.9
L O.I
.3
N-D
N-D
.7
L 0.1
11.4
L O.I
.4
N-D
1.2
.9
1.7
.3
.4
.4
.7
.3
.9
1 .0
1.7
13.7
24.7
1 .4
PR I MART
SLUDGE
24490
80748
37833
1 .4
87093
4843
33783
2949
49918
130
10746
0.1
0.1
O.I
O.I
.1
N-D
0.1
M-D
O.I
O.I
1.0
0.1
.4
N-D
O.I
1.1
0.1
s.a
0.1
N-D
N-D
1.7
.6
M-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
.4
N-D
1 .4
12.7
26.0
.8
PRIMARY SLUDGE IS NOT INCLUDED IN TOTAL OUT COLUMN
POUUTAMTS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED
I-LESS THAN! N-D NOT DETECTED!
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY TO BE VERIFIED
-------
HAB8 BALANCE IN LBS. PER DAY
PLANT 8
FRACTION
BASE-NEUTRALS
METALS
NON-CONV. METALS
2
s
PARAMETER
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
IrZ-BENZANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE
ANTHRACENE
PHENANTHRENE
PYRENE
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
ZINC
ALUMINUM
BARIUM
CALCIUM
IRON
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
SODIUM
INFLUENT
.4
N-D
tf-D
N-0
.3
.3
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-»
48.3
63.9
2.1
42.4
L 0.1
80.9
M-D
2.5
324
242
102
10184
1033
274B
3S.9
24484
TOTAL OUT
M-D
,2
1.1
1.1
2.3
2.3
1.1
t.S
1.0
L 0.1
.7
148
202
9.4
144
.3
133
3.2
.4
1147
87.9
33.1
11134
344
2748
28.8
24294
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
N-D
M-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
M-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
14.0
20.3
.8
14.0
N-D
44.4
4.9
,2
94.7
89.9
33.1
11134
344
2748
28. B
24294
COMBINED
SLUDGE
N-D
.2
1.1
I .1
2.3
2.3
1.1
1.3
1.0
L 0.1
.7
132
181
4.4
14B
.3
90.0
.3
.2
1072
N-b
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
PRIMARY
SLUPOE
N-D
.2
.3
.3
.4
.4
.7
1,0
.B
L 0.1
.4
89.0
103
2.1
49.2
.2
33.2
.2
.1
4BS
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
M-D
N-D
N-D
PRIMARY SLUDGE IB NOT INCLUDED IN TOTAL OUT COLUMN
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED HERE NOT DETECTED
L-LE8S THAN* N-D NOT DETECTED*
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY TO BE VERIFIED
-------
PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF POLLUTANT PARAMETERS
PLANT B
CT;
• i
Wl
A
PARAMETER
1.1. I IRILII1 OROEIIIANE
1.1 DICIIIOROETUANE
Clll OROFOKM
1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE
E Mm BENZENE
nCIHYLENE CHLORIDE
U IRACHLOKOETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
PHENOL
NAPHTHALENE
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
I I (ill
MERCURY
NICKEL
SILVER
Z INC
BENZENE
PENTACHl OROPHENOL
UIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL> PHTHALATE
DI N-DIITYL PHTHALATE
DIETHYL PIUHAIATE
2, 4-DICHLOROPIIENOL
I.4-DICHLOROBENZENE
H UOK'ANTHENE
AN1IIRACENE
PHENANTHRENE
ACRYLONIIRILE
LHLORODENZENE
1,1.2-TRICHLOROETHANE
1.1.2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
CHLOKOETHANE
1 , 1-DlCmORQETHYLENE
I,2 TRANS DICHI OROETHYLENE
METHYL CHLORIDE
METHYL BROMIDE
KJCHl OKOtdf LUOROME IHANE
VINYL CIUORIDE
ACENAPIITHENE
HEXACHI ORObENZENE
1' Clll ORONAPH1HALENE
I ,1' DICHIOR06ENZENE
I . J III CHI IlKObtNZENE
III XACHI HKOlillTAllIEUE
UIMLIUYI f III MAI ATE
I .-' DENZANTHKACENE
IILNZO (A)PYRENE
I 01 I UTANTS NOT LISTED UERE NOT DETECTED
UNCONFIRMED PESTICIDES UERE ASSUMED NOT
NUMBERS IN PARENTHESES ARE THE NUMBER OF
PKLI IMINARY DATA ONLY'IO BE VERIFIED
INFL-
UENT
100
100
100
100
100
too
100
100
too
100
100
100
too
too
100
100
100
too
100
100
75
75
75
SO
SO
25
25
25
23
25
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CTED
NOT
£R OF
SEC
EFFL
( 4)
( 4 »
( 4)
< 4)
< 4)
( 4>
( 4)
( 4)
< 4>
< 4)
< 4)
( 4)
< 4)
< 4(
( 4)
< 4)
( 4)
< 4)
< 4)
< 4)
1 4)
< 4)
< 4)
< 4)
( 4)
( 4)
< 4)
( 4)
( 4)
< 4)
< 4)
( 4)
( 4)
< 41
< 4>
< 4)
< 4)
( 4>
( 4)
( 4)
( 4>
< 4)
< 4)
( 4)
( 4)
( 4)
( 4)
< 4)
< 4)
( 4)
AT ANY
0
0
100
0
SO
100
23
100
23
SO
0
75
100
100
SO
100
0
100
23
100
25
100
100
75
0
25
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
< 4)
( 4)
< 4>
( 4>
< 4)
< 4)
( 4)
( 4)
< 4)
( 4)
( 4)
< 4)
< 4)
< 4)
( 4)
( 4)
< 4)
( 4)
< 4)
( 4)
C 4)
( 4)
( 4)
< 4)
< 4)
( 4)
( 4)
( 4)
< 4)
< 4>
< 4)
( 4>
( 4)
( 4)
< 4)
( 4)
( 4)
( 4)
< 4)
( 4)
( 4)
( 4)
< 4)
( 4)
< 4)
( 4)
( 4)
( 4)
( 4)
( 4)
SAMPLE
PRIM.
SLDO.
47 3)
100
33
47
100
0
100
100
47
47
100
100
too
100
100
100
100
100
100
too
47
47
100
47
0
0
0
100
47
47
33
100
0
33
0
47
100
0
33
47
0
0
0
0
o
o
0
33
33
3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
31
3)
3)
3)
3)
3k
3>
3)
3»
3)
3)
3)
3>
3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
3>
3»
3>
3>
3)
3>
3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
0 ( 3)
POINt
COMB.
SLl'G
0 (4)
2S (4)
0
100
100
0
50
100
73
73
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
75
75
100
0
Q
25
too
75
73
25
o
SO
0
73
o
100
4)
4)
4)
4>
41
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
0 < 4>
0 (4)
SO < 4>
SO (4)
23 < 4)
25 < 4)
25 < 4)
25 < 4)
25 4 >
25 4)
25 4)
SO 4)
0 4)
HEAT
TREATED
SLUDGE
25
0
0
23
100
0
100
100
100
30
73
100
too
100
100
100
100
too
100
100
100
so
100
100
0
0
0
100
75
75
75
IOO
0
75
0
23
100
25
23
too
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50
SO
< 4)
( 4)
( 4)
( 4)
( 4)
( 4)
( 4)
< 4)
< 4)
< 4)
< 4)
( 4)
( 4)
( 4)
( 4)
( 4J>
( 40
< 4)
< 4)
< 4)
< 4)
( 4)
< 4)
< 4)
< 4)
( 4)
< 4)
< 4)
( 4)
( 4>
< 4)
< 4)
41
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
< 4)
< 4)
< 4)
< 4)
< 4)
< 4)
( 41
( 4)
( 4)
DECANT
0
0
0
0
too
100
0
100
75
100
23
0
100
too
100
100
SO
too
0
too
100
too
23
0
0
so
0
0
0
0
0
30
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
( 4)
( 4>
( 4)
( 4)
< 4)
( 4)
< 4)
( 4)
( 4)
< 4)
( 4)
< 4)
( 4)
( 4)
< 4)
< 4)
( 4)
< 4)
< 4)
< 4)
< 4)
< 4)
( 4)
(4)
< 4)
< 4)
< 4)
< 4)
( 4)
< 4)
( 4)
( 4)
< 4)
< 4)
( 4)
( 4)
( 4)
( 4>
( 4)
< 4)
( 4)
< 4)
( 4)
( 4)
< 4)
< 4)
< 4>
( 4)
( 4)
( 4)
DETECTED
SAMPLES
TAKEN
-------
PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF POLLUTANT PARAMETERS
PLANT B
PARAMETER
CMRYSENE
PYRENE
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
SELENIUM
INFL-
UENT
O O-O O O O o
4)
4)
4)
41
4>
4)
4)
SEC.
EFFL
0 (
0 (
0 (
0 <
0 (
0 (
ZS (
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
PRIM,
SLDO.
33
100
too
100
100
100
100
3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
COMB.
SLDO
SO
100
100
100
100
100
100
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
MEAT
TREATED
SLUDOE
30
100
100
too
100
100
100
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
DECANT
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
•8
A
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED AT ANY SAMPLE POINT
UNCONFIRMED PESTICIDES WERE ASSUMED NOT DETECTED
NUMBERS IN PARENTHESES ARE THE NUMBER OF SAMPLES TAKEN
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY-ID BE VERIFIED
-------
SUMMARY
fhAC 11 UN
CUNVtNIIUNALS
NUN-CONVLN110NALS
VOLAIILES
cn
•vj
A
AC III tXlhACI
.)ASi.-HtlJIKALS
PARAMETER
BOO
IOIAL SUSP. SOLIDS
COO
OIL i CREASE
TUTAL PHENOLS
JOIAL SOLIDS
IOIAL UISS. SJLIUS
SEIILEABLE SOLIDS
IOIAL VOLAIILi. SuLIOS
VOLAIILE OISS. SOLIDS
IOTAL VOL. SOS. SOLIDS
AMMONIA NIIROGEN
IOC
BEN/ENE
CARBON lEIKACilLUKlOE
CHLOROBEN2ENE
l.l.l-IRlCHLOKOLMUNk
I.I-OICMLOROEIHANE
1,1,2-IRICMLOKOEIUANL
1.1.2,2-IETRACHLUKOEJHANE
CMLOROLIHANE
CHLOROFORM
1, 2-lRANS-DICIILORGf THYLENE
1.2-OICHLOKOPrfOPANE
EIHYLBENJENE
HLIMYLENE CHLJiUOL
HEIHYL CHLOKIOE
HEIHYL BROMIDE
ILIRACHLOROElMYLtNE
IOLUENE
IKICIILClKUL IHYLLNL
VINYL CIILUkll>L
PAKACHLOROMLIA CKLSOL
4.6-0 IN IIkU-0-CKtSLL
PHENOL
lit XACHLUKUCINIENL
FLJUKANltlLUL
le ANALYTICAL DATA
PLANT 9
UNI IS INHUtNl
fcC/L
MC/L
MC/L
HC/L
UC/L
MC/L
HC/L
HL/L
HC/L
HC/L
HC/L
HC/L
HC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
L
L
L
L
L
I
I
L
I
I
L
113
267
36
67
455
234
9
190
54
131
10
66
1
1
5
5
6
1
5
4
5
5
1
5
2
5
4
a
33
5
2
50
2
20
10
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
SECONDARY PCNI
EFfLUENI REH.
5
14
36
6
7
292
235
1
66
50
9
3
12
4
5
1
5
5
1
5
5
2
5
5
1
5
2
5
0
0
5
5
50
0
60
20
lu
96
91
67
a3
90
36
89
65
7
93
70
86
96
50
100
100
as
PRIMARY
SLUOCE
10666
39536
49361.
1563
657
40697
1162
NOI (
-------
SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL DATA
PLANT 9
FRACTION
BASE-NEUTRALS
METALS
p-rv,
•
GO
A
NUN-CONV. HLTALS
PARAMETER
BISI2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
OI-N-BUTYL PHIHALATE
OIETHYL PHTHALATE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
1,2-BENZANTHRACENE
BENZO (A)PYRENE
11,12-BENZUFLUORANTHENE
CHRYSENE
ANTHRACENE
PHENANTHRENE
PVRENE
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
SELEN1UH
SILVER
ZINC
ALUMINUM
6ARIUH
BORON
CALCIUM
IRON
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
MOLYBDENUM
SODIUM
TIN
TITANIUM
VANADIUM
UNI IS
UC/L
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/l
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
NG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
HG/L
UG/L
MG/L
UG/L
UC/L
HG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
INFLUENT
5
20
13
11
20
10
10
10
10
20
20
10
0
2
1
3
55
70
82
91
1000
36
2
11
160
577
115
M5
29
1505
7
16V
36
46
20
27
4
I
L
I
L
t
I
L
I
I
L
L
L
I
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
20
20
16
2
20
10
10
10
10
20
20
10
0
2
1
Z
3
26
27
17
1000
2%
2
1
57
9B
34
m
27
372
I
91
7
46
26
6
2
PCNT
REM.
82
33
95
63
67
81
34
91
64
83
70
10
7
75
46
78
50
PRIMARY
SLUDGE
2017
767
110
7
11
11
50
10
N-0
92
92
72
40
37
1 L
257
7333
11633
30523
6200
114667
4767
47
126
25963
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT DUN
NOT RUN
NOT SUN
NUT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
N01 RUN
SECONDARY
SLUDGE
460
47
12
8
5
8
N-D
N-D
B
16
16
12
14
19
6
152
2197
39 CO
440
2250
46333
656
40
328
4800
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
I<1)1 RUN
MOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED HERE NEVER UEIECTEO
L-LE5S THANI N-0 NOT DETECTED!
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY TO BE VERIFIED
-------
MASS BALANCE IN L6S. PER DAY
PLANT 9
fKACFION
CONMENTIONALS
NUN-CONVENTIOHAL8
VOLATILES
cr,
cc
A
PARAMETER
BOD
TOTAL 6USP. SOLIDS
COD
OIL t GREASE
TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS
TOTAL DI88. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDS
VOLATILE DIES. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOL.. BUS. SOLIDS
AMMONIA NITROGEN
TOC
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
CHLOROBEN2ENE
ItIiI-TRICHLOROETHANE
1>1-DICHLOROETHANE
I•1> 2-TRICHLOROETHANE
I i I .2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
CHLOROFORM
If2-TRAN8-DICHLOROETHYLENE
I.2-DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYLBENZENE
METHYLENC CHLORIDE
METHYL CHLORIDE
METHYL BROMIDE
TEIRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
VINYL CHLORIDE
PARACHLOROHETA CKE60L
4'4-DINlTRO-O-CRESOL
PHENOL
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
FL.UORANTHENE
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL> PHTHALATE
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
DIMETHYL PllfHAtATE
1 • 2-BENZANTIIRACENE
BtN/0 (A)PYNEHE
II . 12-BENZOFLIJORANIIIENE
CHKY9ENE
ANIIIKACENE
PHt~NANIHfcLN£
PYRENE
PU1IUTAN1S NOT LISTED UERE NOT DETECTED
1-1 ESS 1HANI N-D NOT DETECTED)
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY TO BE VERIFIED
ACID EXTRACT
BASE-NEUTRALS
INFLUENT TOTAL
48739
15458
44221 52994
114993 68744
13318 4188
SECONDARY
OUT EFFLUENT
2014
4183
13534
2733
28.8 S.I 3-0
196238 173377 125996
100898 103979 101401
81840
23373
36382
4099
37232
43913
22044
39133
1483
17181
28479
21719
4027
1294
3034
3 1.9 1.9
4 N-D N-D
N-0 .2 .2
N-D L 0.
N-D L 0.
9.
8 .
4 10.
N-D 10.
| ,
7 .
N-D
N-D 1 0.
2,
2 .
2 10.
8 1.
N-D 7.
1.
3.
14.
7 CO.
3 4.
3 10.
N-0
N-D
.4
N-D
N-D
.7
N-D
N-D
.4
N-0
1.0
N-D
L 0.1
. 1
N-D
N-0 2.3 N-D
.8 N-D N-D
N-D
.1
.9 2.3 N-D
N-D L 0.
H-
1.
N-
3.
4.
N-
N-
N-
N
N-
N-
N-
N-
0 L O.I
N-D
N-D
9 3.4 N-D
D .3 N-D
4 4.1
t 6.0
3 .9 .9
D L 0.
D L 0.
D L 0.
D L 0.
D 1 0.
D
D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N D
N-D
N-D
D L 0.1 N-D
PRIMARY
SLUDGE
4524
14447
20341
439
.3
14950
484
12773
144
12609
43.0
4348
t 0.1
N-D
I 0.1
I 0.1
L 0.1
N-D
L 0.1
6.9
N-D
.2
L 0.1
I 0.1
1 0.1
.3
4.7
L 0.1
.7
I 0.1
2.4
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
N-D
I O.I
1.2
.3
L O.I
L 0.1
L 0.1
1 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
N-D
L 0. 1
L 0.1
L O.I
SECONDARY
SLUDOE
8918
30344
32649
794
1.8
32431
2094
22461
163
22497
148
777V
N-D
N-D
N-0
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
3.3
N-D
t 0.1
N-D
L O.I
N-D
N-D
2.4
N-D
3.6
I 0.1
t O.I
H-D
N-D
2.3
L 0.1
L 0.1
2.2
.2
L 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
-------
MASS BALANCE IN LB8., PER PAY
PLANT
TRACTION
METALS
NON-CONV. METALB
o
A
PARAMETER
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
NERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
ZIHC
ALUMINUM
BARIUM
BORON
CALCIUM
IRON
MAGNESIUM
NAHOAHESE
MOLYBDENUM
SODIUM
TIN
TITANIUM
VANADIUN
INFLUENT
L O.I
.7
N-D
1.4
23.7
30.1
35. 2
37.2
N-D
14.3
.6
4*7
47.0
247
47. 3
42.7
12298
447
2747
73.1
N-D
17773
8.4
11.4
t.S
TOTAL OUT
.2
1.0
L 0.1
1.7
15.1
34. B
24.3
20.4
.2
17.0
.8
1.7
SB. 3
_
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
L O.I
.7
N-D
.7
1.4
11. 1
11. 5
7.1
N-D
10.7
.4
.2
24. 3
42.4
14.4
34.4
11307
141
2977
37.3
2,7
17773
N-D
2.4
.B
PRIHARY
SLUDGE
L 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
.1
3.1
4.7
12.7
2.4
I 0.1
2.0
L 0.1
L 0.1
10. B
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
SECONDARY
SLUDGE
I 0,1
I O.I
N-D
.7
10.4
18.8
2.1
10.7
.2
4.1
.2
1.4
23.2
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
HOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
HOT RUN
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED HERE NOT DETECTED
L-LESS TIIANI N-D HOT DETECTED!
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY TO BE VERIFIED
-------
PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF POLLUTANT PARAMETERS
PLANT »
PARAMETER
101 UtHl
IRICMLOROETHYLENE
blETIIYL PHTHALATE
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
NICKEL
SII VCR
ZINC
CHLOROFORM
ARSENIC
1 • I .2 TRICIILOROETIIANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
PHENOL
CADMIUM
SELENIUM
BI8<2-ETHYLHEXYL> PHTHALATE
UIM BUTYL PIITHALATE
MEdltL CHLORIDE
PARACHLOROHETA CRE60L
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
1 . 1.2.2 TETRACHLOROETHANE
ETHYLbENZENE
HETHYLENE CHLORIDE
ANTIMONY
till OkObENZENE
I > 1 > I-TRICIIl OROETIIANE
I. I DirilLOROETIIANE
CHL OROETIIANE
I ,2-IRANS-DICIII OROETHYLENE
I .2-DICHLOROPROPANE
METHYL BROMIDE
VINYL CHLORIDE
4.4-D1NIIRO-0-CRESOL
HLXACIH OKObLNZENE
FLUORANTHENE
DUTYL BENZYL PIITHALATE
DIMETHYL PIITHALATE
1. 2-BENZANTHRACENE
BENZO (A)PVKENE
11.12 -BENZOFLUORANTHENE
CIIRYSLNE
ANIIIRACENE
I III NANIHKfNE
IYKLNE
ui KYI i urn
HI Kl (Hi »
INFLUENT
100
too
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
too
83
83
47
47
47
47
47
50
SO
33
3]
17
17
17
17
17
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
33
0
50
33
100
100
33
100
so
100
B3
100
17
17
0
83
SO
0
33
33
0
so
0
0
17
0
17
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4>
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
PRIMARY
SLUIiQE
100
100
17
83
83
100
100
83
83
83
0
100
0
100
17
83
too
too
47
33
0
47
0
J7
100
33
100
SO
17
83
too
47
47
100
100
0
0
30
83
17
17
17
14
0
SO
SO
SO
17
100
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
41
4)
4)
4)
4>
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
7>
S)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
SECONDARY
SLUbOE
100
47 <
17
83
83
100
100
83
83
83
0
100
0
0
83
83
too
83
17
0
0
0
0
0
SO
0
83
0
0
0
33
83
0
SO
17
0
17
17
33
17
17
0
0
17
33
33
17
0
100
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4>
4>
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
( 4)
inilUIANIS NOT LISTED UERE NOT DETECTED AT ANY SAMPLE POINT
UNCONFIRMED PESTICIDES UERE ASSUMED NOT DETECTED
NUMBERS IN PARENTHESES ARE THE NUHbER OF SAMPLES TAKEN
IKEIIHINARY DATA ONLY-TO BE VERIFIED
-------
SUtlHAKY UF ANALYTICAL ItAIA
PLAM 10
UMFLl PU1NIS INLY
FRACTION
CONVENTIOMALS
NON-CONVENTIONALS
VOU TILES
T
PARAMETER
UUO
TOTAL SUSP. SUL10S
OIL t CREASl
TOTAL PHENOLS .
TOTAL SOLIDS
TOTAL DISS. SOU I OS
TOTAL VOLATILE SOLU'S
AMMONIA NlIKOCEM
TOC
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDi
1,1,1-TRICHLOKOETHANE
1,1-DICHLORUETHANE
CHtOROETHANE
CHLOROFORM
1,2-OICHLOROPKOPANE
EIHYLBLNIENE
METHYLENE CHIUK IDE
METHYL CHLORIDE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
VINYL CHLORIOt
PHENOL
1,2,1-TRICHLOKUBENZENE
1.2-D1CHLOROBENZENE
1.3-DICHLOROBEN/ENE
1,4-OICHLOROGcNlENE
NAPHTHALENE
BISI2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTIIALATE
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
OI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
OIETHYL PHTHALA1E
11,12-eEUZOFLUORAMHENE
1,12-BENZOPERYLENL
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED HERE NEVER DETECTED
L-LESS THANI N-0 NOT DETECTED)
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY- TO BE VERIFIED
AC10 EXTRACT
BASE-NEUTRALS
UNITS
tiC/l
CC/L
MG/L
UO/L
HG/L
HG/L
MG/L
MG/L
HC/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UO/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
tt/l
UG/L
UG/L
UC/L
UC/L
LC/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
SECONDARY PCNI
IhFLUtM EFFLULHI KEM.
242
222
71.
6*
050
633
27V
24
1M
0
0
3
I
1
9
0
4
31
50
5
12
56
L 10
9
1
3
1
3
3
86
3
5
3
0
I 2C
tb -)3
10 13
17 77
16 75
51* J6
489 23
12U ->4
9 03
J3 M
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
67
0
89
3 35
92
20
)2
98
0
I 1 09
L 5
I 3
I 3
I 3
I 2 33
9 70
L 2 33
6
L 3
L 10
L 20
L
L
L
L
I
L
L
L
L
L
I
L
L
I
I
I
L
L
L
L
PRE CL
EFFLUENT
NOT FUN
NOT KLIN
NUT f.u:<
NUT F.UN
NOT RUN
NOT KUN
NUT KUN
NOT RUN
NOT kUH
0
6
34
10
3
1
1
10
1
f
3
3
3
2
IB
2
7
1
10
20
I
L
L
L
L
L
L
I
I
L
L
L
L
L
L
I
I
I
T. F.
EFFLUENT
23
1't
17
116
623
b9l
129
I'l
•.6
1
1
1
1
10
2
1
1
50
10
3
0
1
10
0
5
3
3
3
2
8
2
7
3
10
0
-------
HEIALS
2!
A
.,„
fKE CL
UNllS
INKULNl
. -000
ALPMA-bHC
bETA-BHC
GAMMA-BHC
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
HERCUMV
NICKEL
SILVER
ZINC
NON-CONV. NEIALS ALUMINUM
MANGANESE
SODIUM
NC/L
M./L
NC/L
NC/L
NC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
NC/L
UC/L
UC/L
L J°
I 60
1 JO
i £, f
HC/L
UC/L
MC/L
971
40
ir
98
109
jo
oO
10
10
U
1
32
11
163
3
60
35
i
73
Ma
19
35.
M
95
t)0
T. F-
EfFLUENl
....
M
*)0
US
ao
A |
» 1
91
/5
65
D5
J*
41
33
3
27
L 30
L 60 t
L JO
3
hOI KUN
NOI KUN
NOT BUM
NOT RUN
NOT »UN
NOI KUN
NOI KUN
NOI KUN
NOI KUN
»*ot t>(i»4
NOI KUN
NOI KUN
NOI KUN
NOT KUN
NOI KUN
NOT RUN
7
3b
. 10
1
J 7
• *
6
10
I J.O
1" *
"I
0
11
1
56
43
13
35
79
16
.90
96
NU1 OtfECILUl
- T0 B
-------
SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL DATA
PLANT 10
SLLDCE SAMPLE POINTS ONLY
FRACTION
CONVENT1UNALS
NON-CONVENTIONALS
VOLATILES
PARAMETER
BOO
TOTAL SUSP. SOLIDS
OIL t CREASE
TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS
TOTAL UISS. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOLATILE S3LIOS
AMMONIA NITROGEN
TOC
ACRYLONITRILfc
BENZENE
CHLOROBENZENE
l.l-UICHLOROETHANt
1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETUANE
CHLOROETHANE
CHLOROFORM
1,1-OICHLOROtTHYLENE
1.2-TRANS-OICHLURCETHYUNE
1,2-DICHLOROPKOPAKE
ETHYLBENZENE
HETHYLENE CHLURIUE
METHYL CHLORIDE
METHYL BROMIDE
OICMLOROBROMOMiTHANt
01CHLOROOIF LUURUME TIlANL
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOKOETHYLENE
VINYL CHL3K10L
PHENOL
ACENAPHIHENE
HCXACHLOROBENZENE
FLUORANTMENE
NAPHTHALENE
BISI2-ETMYLHCXYL) FHTIIALATL
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED MERE NEVER JETltHO
L-LESS THANI N-D NOT DETECILDI
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY TO 8E VEMFIEX
ACID EXTRACT
BASE-NEUTRALS
UMTS
HC/L
MC/L
HC/L
UC/L
HC/L
nc/i
HC/L
HC/L
HC/L
UG/L
UC/L
U(./l
Ub/L
UC/L
UC/L
UO/L
UC/L
UC/L
LC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
tG/L
LC/L
UC/L
UC/L
I'C/L
UC/L
LC/L
UO/L
LC/L
Ut/L
»i(,/L
UC/L
DICtSIED
SLUDCE
6276
2BV50
290
716
18344
300
12071
70u
7570
N-0
4
4
N-n
N-0
N-0
1
N-b
866
0
119
N-0
2
N-t>
1
N-0
N-D
2524
0
11
mi
N-0
N-D
Id
51
3722
CUMBINEO PCNl
SLUDGE REM.
5556 11
J21.CO
295
473 3*
23375
HOT RUN
23178
41. n
16264
N-D
11
1 75
6
N-0
N-D
N-U
N-J
536 38
1
45 62
37
N-0
M-'J
N-0
H-0
1
3042
2
105
123 9.)
N-0
40
14-3
•4-iJ
3301)
.WASTE
ACTIVATED
SLUUCE
ta333
HOI KUM
109
715
11469
NOT RUN
BO 19
37
3694
3
1
N-D
N-0
N-D
N-0
N-0
N-0
H-0
N-D
N-0
N-D
16
121
N-0
N-0
1
701
1
N-l)
N-D
N-D
N-0
N-0
N-U
U60
SECONDARY
SLUDGE
239
555
56
41
1244
043
6tO
25
206
N-D
0
N-D
0
0
N-0
0
0
N-i)
N-0
1
1
N-D
N-0
N-0
62
19
12
10
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-0
N-0
K-\j
3':'«
T. F.
SLUDGE
NUI HUN
5500
271
430
1 1329
II tCO
9400
23
t-ni
N-D
1
N-U
N-b
N-0
150
N-0
N-U
15
N-D
1
N-0
N-0
250
N-D
N-U
N-U
2342
N-0
N-U
l.'OO
9
N-0
1)
N-U
lObO
-------
SUMHAkY Of ANALYTICAL DATA
PLANT 10
SLUbCE SAMPLE HOINIS ONLY
FRACI I UN
BASE-NEUTRALS
MtULS
•vl
01
/\
PARAMETER
BUTYL UENm PMIHALAIE
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALAIE
DIETHYL PHTHALAIE
1.2-bENZANIHKACENt
CHRYSENE
ANTHRACENE
fLUORENE
PHENANTHHENE
PYKENt.
ANUHQNY
ARSENIC
BEHYLL1UH
CADMIUM
CHHQMlUh
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
HERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
2 INC
UNITS
UL/L
L.C/L
t(,/L
tC/L
L.C/L
Ut/L
Ut/l
LC/L
CC/L
UC/L
UC/L
liu/L
UC/L
UG/L
UC/L
UC/L
LC/L
KC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UICCSIEO
SLUOCC
lib
ii
*3
N-l>
N-U
79
ie
79
IB
»1
U
1
87b
7017
16200
516CO
7140
^2b3J
ii!7
176
50b
45700
COHblNEO
SLUOCE
db
it
U-J
6i
o5
47
N-0
<, 1
H
I0a
27
4
143
looo
7150
69167
6150
*»bOO
3^0
2JJ
*5
21500
PCNT
REH.
16
41
SI
34
76
79
56
14
5i
t>6
91
53
MASIt
ACTIVATED
SLUDGE
110
N-D
N-0
38
36
5050
100
5050
31
10
M
4
660
6450
7950
1675
4450
34000
1J5&
111
265
16350
SECONDARY
SLUOCE
14
4
N-0
N-D
N-D
11
N-U
11
N-D,
a
2
2
24
175
S65
440
288
L 12030
2e
29
92
1903
T. f.
SLUDGE
47
50
N-0
16
16
395
N-0
395
22
20
23
4
244
2800
4400
2445
2600
16600
560
225
550
8600
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED UENE NEVER OEILCTED
L-LESS THAN! N-0 NOT DETECTED!
PKLLIMINAKV DATA UHLY TO BE VEKlfliU
-------
HASS BALANCE IN IBS. PER DAY
PLANT 10
FRACTION
COHVEHTIOHALS
NON-CONVENTIONALS
VOLATILEB
8
ACID EXTRACT
PARAMETER
BOD
TOTAL SUSP. SOLIDS
OIL I OREA8E
TOTAL PHEHOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS
TOTAL DISB. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDS
AMMONIA NITROOEN
TOC
BEHZEHE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
CMLOROBEMZEHE
IfItl-TRICHLOROETMANE
1rI-DICHLOROETMAHE
I•112 »2-TETRACHLOROETHAHE
CHLOROETHANE
CHLOROFORM
Itl-DICHLOROETHYLENE
1.2-TRAMS-DICHLOROETHYLENE
1>2-DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYLBENZENE
HETHYLEHE CHLORIDE
METHYL CHLORIDE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHAHE
TETRACHLOROETHYLEHE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHYLEHE
VIHYL CHLORIDE
PHEHOL
BASE-NEUTRALS 1i2i4-TRICHLORODEHZEHE
HEXACHLOROBEHZEHE
1r2-DICHLOROBEHZEHE
1.3-DICHLOROBEHZEHE
1r 4-DICHLOROBEHZEHE
HAPHTHALENE
BIB<2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
,,,,'., DI-H-BUTYL PHTHALATE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
112-BENZANTHRACEHE
11f12-BENZOFLUORAHTHEHE
CHRY8ENE
ANTHRACENE
It12-BENZOPERYLEHE
PHENAHTHREHE
PYRENE
BALANCE AROUND TRICKLING FILTER PLANT ONLY
SECONDARY SLUDGE IS NOT INCLUDED IN TOTAL OUT COLUMN
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED HERE NOT DETECTED
L-LESB THAN» N-D NOT DETECTEDI
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY—-TO BE VERIFIED
INFLUENT
13758
I2B13
4318
3.7
47071
34953
16106
1397
6 SB I
L
L
L
t
L
L
L
L
O.I
0.1
H-D
.2
0.1
N-D
O.I
.9
H-D
M-D
0.1
• a
4.6
2.9
H-D
.3
.7
3.2
N-D
.9
0.1
N-D
.2 .
0.1
.2
.1
9.0
.2
.3
.2
N-D
0.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
TOTAL OUT
2733
9753
1032
6.B
42273
12444
1120
6743
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
1
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
O.I
N-D
0.1
N-D
O.I
N-D
N-D
.1
N-D
.1
0.1
O.I
2.7
N-D
N-D
.2
.0
0.1
O.I
0.1
N-D
O.I
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
1.4
0.1
.4
N-D
0.1
N-D
0.1
0,1
0.1
0.1
0.1
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
1347
BOB
938
6,7
35792
34213
7424
HOB
2477
N-D
H-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N^D
N-D
.1
N-D
H-D
N-D
N-D
2.7
N-D
H-D
.2
L 0.1
H-D
N-D
I O.I
N-D
N-D
H-D
H-D
N-D
N-D
.9
N-D
.4
H-D
H-D
H-D
H-D
N-D
L 0.1
N-D
H-D
COMB I MED
8LUDOE
1388
B147
73.7
.1
6341
NOT RUN
9042
12.3
4044
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
0.1
N-D
0.1
H-D
0.1
M-D
H-D
H-D
N-D
.1
0.1
O.I
O.I
H-D
H-D
0.1
.8
O.I
0.1
0.1
H-D
0.1
H-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
.7
0.1
0.1
N-D
0.1
N-D
0.1
0.1
N-D
O.I
0.1
SECONDARY
SLUDGE
2V. 9
69.3
7.0
L 0.1
193
105
79.0
3.1
39.8
0.1
H-D
H-D
M-D
O.I
0.1
H-D
0.1
0.1
H-D
0.1
O.I
H-D
0.1
O.I
O.I
0.1
H-D
H-D
H-D
H-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
0,1
O.I
0.1
H-D
N-D
H-D
H-D
O.I
N-D
0.1
H-D
-------
MASS BALANCE IN LB8. PER PAT
PLANT 10
FRACTION
PESTICIDES
METALS
NON-CONU. METALS
PARAMETER
DIELDRIN
4.4--DDD
BETA-BHC
OAMMA-BHC
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
ZINC
ALUMINUM
BARIUM
CALCIUM
IRON
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
SODIUM
INFLUENT
N-D
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
M-D
N-D
N-D
.1
.*
4.2
47.5
1.9
t O.I
.2
N-D
.9
12.0
34.2
4.S
2319
41.1
1212
9.7
427J
SECONDARY COMBINED
TOTAL OUT EFFLUENT SLUDGE
I
L
I
L
L
L
I
L
L
L
0. L 0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
,
.
2 ,
27.
1 »
0.
•
0.
0.
L 0.
L 0.
L 0.
N-
N-
M-
.
.
,
9.
»
L 0.
,
N-
L 0.
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
.4
l.B
17.3
1.9
I 0.1
L O.I
L 0.1
L 0.1
a. t 3.2 *•*
2.9 NOT RUM
.8 NOT RUM
2040 MOT RUM
4.4 NOT RUN
1039 NOT RUN
9.2 NOT RUN
3342 NOT RUN
SECONDARY
8LUDOE
L
L
L
I
I
t
L
L
I
I
I
N-D
M-D
N-D
N-0
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
M-
0.
0.
0.
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
MOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUM
MOT RUM
NOf RUM
DAI ANLE AROUND 1HICMINU FILTER PLANT ONLY
bLCUMOAHY SLUDGE IS NOT 1NCLUDEU IN TOTAL OUT COLUMN
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED UERE NOT DETECTED
1-LEGS THANI N-D NOT DETECTED*
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY TO BE VERIFIED
-------
PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF POLLUTANT PARAMETERS
PLANT 10
00
/I
ro
PARAMETER
CHLOROFORM
METMYLENE CHLORIDE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TRICIILOROETHYLENE
PHENOL :
BIS<2-ETHYLHEXYL> PHTHALATE
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
COPPER
CYANIDE
MERCURY
ZINC
1fIrI-TRICHLOROETHANE
ETHVLBENZENE
1i4-DICHLOROBEHZENE
OAMHA-BHC
CHROMIUM
SILVER
1.1-D1CHLOROETHANE
METHYL CHLORIDE
NAPHTHALENE
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
LEAD
1.2-DICHLOROBENZENE
CADMIUM
lr2.4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
NICKEL
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
1>2-DICHLOROPROPANE
1>3-DICHLOROBENZENE
11.12-BENZOFLUORANTHENE
ACRYLONITRILE
CHLOROBENZENE
1>1.2.2-TETRACHLOROETHAHE
1>1-DICHLOROETHYLENE
1.2-TRAN8-DICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYL BROMIDE
BICHLOROBROHOHETHANE
DICHLORODIFLUOROHETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
ACENAPHTHENE
HEXACIILOROBENZENE
FLUORANTHENE
1r2-8ENZANTHRACENE
CHRY6ENE
ANTHRACENE
1.12-BENZOPERYLENE
FLUORENE
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED HERE NOT DETECTED
UNCONFIRMED PESTICIDES WERE ASSUMED NOT
NUMBERS IN PARENTHESES ARE THE NUMBER OF
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY-TO BE VERIFIED
INFL-
UENT
100
100
100
100
100
too
100
100
100
too
100
100
83
83
83
83
83
83
47
47
47
47
47
47
SO
SO
33
33
17
17
17
17
17
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
PRECL
EFFL
4) 47
4> 100
4) 83
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
41 .100
4) 0
4) 0
5) , 0
4> 0
4) 0
4> 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 17
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) O
4) 100
4) 33
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
41 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
41 0
4) 0
4» 0
4> 6
4) 0
4) 0
4) 9
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
4) 0
4> 0
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
4) 0
SEC.
EFFL
( 4) 83
< 4) 100
4) 83
4> 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 100
4> 0
1 47
) 100
> 40
> too
4) 0
4> 0
4) 0
41 47
> 100
> 33
4) 0
4> 17
4> 0
4) 100
4) 0
) 17
4) 0
> 33
4) 0
) 83
41 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
4> 0
4> 0
4) 0
4> 0
4> 0
4> 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4> 17
4> 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
4) 0
4) 0
T.F.
EFFL
4) 83
4> 100
4> 100
4) 17
4) 0
4) 17
4) 100
4) 0
4) 100
3) 100
3> 17
4> 100
4) 0
6) 0
4) 0
4) 83
4> 47
4) 17
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 100
4) 0
4) 17
4) 0
4) 17
4) 0
4> SO
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
4) 0
4» 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 17
4> 0
DIG.
6LPG
4) SO
4> 0
4) 0
4) 100
4> 17
4> 47
4) 100
4) 17
4) 100
5> 100
4) 100
4> 100
4) 0
4) 100
4) 0
4) 0
4) 100
4) 100
4) 0
4) 17
41 17
4> 17
4> 33
4) 100
4) 0
4> 100
4) 0
4> 100
4> 100
4) 0
4) 0
4) 17
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4> 17
4> 0
4) 0
4) 100
4> 0
4> 17
4) 0
4) 47
4) 0
4) 0
4> 17
4> 0
4) 0
4) SO
4) 0
41 17
SEC.
3LDO
4> 0
4) 0
4) 50
4> 100
4> 50
4) 0
4> 100
4> SO
4) SO
5) 100
4) 100
4) 50
4) 0
4) 0
41 0
4) 0
4) SO
4) SO
4) 0
4> SO
4> 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 100
4> 0
41 50
4) 0
4) SO
4) 100
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) SO
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
4> 0
4> 100
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
4) 30
4> 30
4) 30
4) 0
4> SO
UrtSt
SCUM
2) 0
2) 0
2> 0
2) 100
2) 0
2) 50
2) 100
2) SO
2) 100
2) 1OO
2> 100
2) 100
2) 0
2) 100
2) 0
2) 0
2) 100
2) 100
21 0
2» 0
2) 0
2) 50
2) 0
2) 100
2) 0
2) 100
2> 0
2) 100
2) 100
2) 0
2) 50
2) 0
2) 0
2) 0
2) 0
2) 0
2) 0
2> 0
2) 100
2) 100
2) 0
2) 0
2> 0
2) 50
2) 0
2) SO
2> SO
2) 30
2) 100
2) 0
( 2) 0
T.F.
SLPO
2) 23
2) 100
2> 100
2> 73
2) 100
2) 0
1> 100
2) 25
2> 100
2) 100
2) 0
2> 100
2> 0
2) SO
2) 0
2> 0
2) 73
2) 100
2) 23
2) 0
21 0
2) 23
2) 0
2) 100
2) 0
2) 73
2) 0
2) 73
2) 23
2) 0
2) 0
2) 0
2> 0
2) 0
2) 0
2) 0
2) 23
2) 23
2) 0
2) 0
2) 0
2> 100
2) 0
2> 0
( 2) 0
< 2) 0
( 2) 0
( 2) 0
( 2) 25
( 2) 0
( 2) 0
COMB.
SLDO
4> 0
4) tOO
4) 25
4> 100
4) 50
4) 30
4> 73
4) 25
4> SO
3) 100
4) 100
4» 30
4> 0
4) 100
4> 0
4> 0
4) 50
4» 30
4) 100
4) 0
4) 0 :
4) 23
4) O
4) 100
4) 0
4( 30
4) 0
4) 50
4) 100
4) 0
4) 0
4> 25
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 50
4> 0
4) 0
4) 75
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 75
4> 0
4> 23
4) 0
4) 25
4> 25
4) 50
4> 0
( 4) 0
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
2)
3»
2>
2>
4)
4>
4>
4)
2>
2)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
2)
4)
2)
4)
2)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4>
4>
4)
4>
4>
4>
4)
4)
AT ANY SAMPLE POINT
DETECTED
SAMPLES TAKEN
-------
PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF POLLUTANT PARAMETERS
PLANT 10
PARAMETER
I-IIENANIIIRENE
PYRENE
DlELDfclN
4.4' -DDD
At CIIA bllC
fcEIA-miC
ANTIMONY
ARSEMIC
BERYLLIUM
SELENIUM
INFL-
UENT
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
PRECL
EFFL
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
At 0
A) 17
A) 0
4> 0
A) 0
A) 0
6) 0
6EC.
EFFL
4) 0
A) 0
4> 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
> 0
> 0
> 0
> 0
T.F.
EFFL
6> 0
At 0
4> 1?
A) 17
4> 0
A) 1 7
A) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
DIO.
SLDO
4) SO
4) 17
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 100
4> 100
A) 30
4) 100
SEC. UASt
SLtlG SCUM
4> SO ( 2) 100
A) SO ( 2) SO
4) 0 < 2) 0
4) 0(2) 0
4) 0(2) 0
4) 0(2) 0
4) SO < 2) 100
6) 30 < 2) 100
4) SO < 2) SO
4) 100 < 2) 100
T.F. COMb.
6LDO SLt'G
2) 25 (4) 50 ( 4)
2) 0 < 4) 50 < 4)
2) 0 < 4) 0(4)
2) 0(4) 0(4)
2) 0(4) 0 < 4>
2) 0(4) 0(4)
2) 25 ( 4) 100 ( 2)
2) 23 ( 4) 100 (2)
2) 25 (4) SO ( 2>
2> 100 < 4) 100 ( 2)
CD
/\
ho
GJ
lUILUIANIb NOT LISTED UERE NUT DETECTED AT ANY SAMPLE POINT
UNCONFIKMED PESTICIDES WERE ASSUMED NOT DETECTED
miMUEKS IN PAREN1IIESES ARE THE NllhbtK OF SAMPLES TAKEN
KKLLIM1NARY DATA ONLY-TO BE VERIFIED
-------
SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL UAU
PLANT 11
FRACUUN
CONVENTIONAL;
NON-CONVENT IONALS
VOUTILES
PARAMETER
BOO
TOTAL SUSP. SOLIDS
OIL C GREASE
TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIbS
TOTAL OISS. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDS
AHHONIA NITROGEN
TOC
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLOKIOE
CHLOROBENZENE
1.1»1-TRICHLOROETHANE
1,1-OI,CHLOROEIHANE
CHLORDJE THANE
CHLOROFORM
li2-IRJANS-DICHLOROETIirLENE
1,3-DllcHLOROPROPYLENE
ETHYLBIENZENE
HETHYLENE CHLORIDE
METHYL CHLORIDE
DICHLOROBROMOHETHANE
TRICHLOROFLUOKOHETHANE
TETRACHLOROEIHYLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROEIHYLENE
2,4-DIHETHYLPHENOL
PHENOL
ACENAPHTHENE
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
1.2-DICHLOROHENZENE
NAPHTHALENE
B1SI2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALAU
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-BUTYL PHIHALATE
D1ETHYL PHIHALATE
1,2-BENZANIHRACENE
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED HERE NEVER DETECTED
L-LESS THAN! N-D NOT DETECTED!
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY —TO BE VERIFIED
ACID EXTRACT
BASE-NEUIRALS
mills
HG/L
HG/L
HG/L
UG/L
HC/L
HG/L
HG/L
MG/L
HG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/t
UG/L
U(./L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
OG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UC/L
OG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
I
I
INHUEI
99
171
66
292
1920
1127
292
IB
72
33
5
9
170
6
5
5
3
3
10
90
5
5
5
55
50
73
2
15
10
4
10
3
52
1
4
2
5
,1
L
L
I
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
I
L
L
FRE-CL PCNT
LFFLUENT REM.
27
1*
9
60
1166
1109
203
10
30
1
5
5
12
0
5
1
0
5
1
21
5
5
5
7
2
3
25
30
10
3
0
10
59
10
2
1
5
73
92
86
77
12
2
30
44
58
97
93
100
80
100
90
77
07
96
96
25
50
50
I
L
I
L
I
L
L
L
L
L
L
SECONDARY COMBINED
EFFLUENT SLUOGE
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUM
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUM
NOT RUN
NOT FUN
2
2
5
13
0
5
1
0
5
1
30
5
0
5
II
7
5
25
30
10
0
10
10
51
0
2
0
5
5555
78250
773
322
35600
NOT RUH
26238
51
6770
401
N-0
125
N-0
223
517
N-0
744
N-0
193
1055
94
N-0
3
2
503
4
N-0
173
153
N-0
N-0
32
3683
213
41
N-D
22
SECONDARY
SLUDGE
1JI5
13->6
33
20
2122
NOT RUN
886
16
370
2
N-0
6
N-b
TO
N-0
N-0
17
3
11
33
5
N-0
0
1
8
5
N-0
300
H-0
N-0
N-0
N-D
924
N-0
N-0
N-0
N-0
-------
SUMMARY Of ANALYTICAL DATA
PLANT H
K
-------
HASS BALANCE IN LB8. PER DAY
PLANT 11
FRACTION
CONVENTIONALB
NON-CONVENTIONALS
VOLATILE8
00
A
PARAMETER
DOD
TOTAL SUSP. SOLIDS
OIL a GREASE
TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS
TOTAL DIBS. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDS
AMMONIA NITROGEN
TOC
BENZENE
CHLOROBENZENE
l>t»l-TRICHLOROETHANE
l»t-DICHLORO£THANE
CHLOROETHAHE
CHLOROFORM
,t»2-TRAHS-DICHLOROETHVLEHE
tr3-DICHLOROPROPVLENE
ETHVLBENZENE
HETHYLEHE CHLORIDE
METHYL CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROFLUOROHETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TftlCHLOROETHYLENE
2r4-DINETHYLPHENOL
PHENOL
ACEHAPHTHENE
HEXACHLOROBEHZENE
1,2-DICIILOROBENZENE
NAPHTHALENE
BI8<2-ETHYLHEXYL> PHTHALATE
BUTYL BEHZYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
lr2-BENZANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE
ANTHRACENE
PHENANTHRENE
ALDRIN
ALPHA-BHC
BETA-BHC
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
CADHIUH
CHROMIUM
SECONDARY BLUDBE IS NOT INCLUDED IN TOTAL OUT COLUMN
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED
L-LESS THAN I N-D NOT DETECTED!
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY TO BE VERIFIED
ACID EXTRACT
BASE-NEUTRALS
PESTICIDES
METALS
INFLUENT
31422
34B41
21113
73.3
423224
341408
93392
344*
J3I98
-10.7
N-D
34.4
1.9
N-D
1.4
l.A
N-D
3.3
29.?
N-D
N-D
17.4
16.0
23.3
.3
4.7
N-D
1.1
N-D
1.1
14.6
.2
1.4
.6
N-D
H-D
2.3
2.3
.5
.2
L 0.1
.4
9.2
2.7
48. 8
TOTAL OUT
14148
82762
3393
22.0
40V421
-
?1170
3098
18342
.4
.1
4.0
.3
.3
.4
.8
N-D
.3
7.8
L 0.1
L 0.1
2.4
1.0
1.0
N-D
.2
.2
.9
L 0.1
L 0.1
22.7
.2
.3
.2
L 0.1
L 0.1
.3
.3
.4
N-D
N-D
1.1
10.3
3.0
44.2
PRE-CL
EFFLUENT
8395
4343
2822
21.7
373833
333408
44943
3047
9348
.2
N-D
4.0
.1
H-D
.4
L 0.1
N-D
.3
4.7
H-D
N-D
2.4
.3
1.0
N-D
N-D
N-D
iV
L 0.1
N-D
18.8
N-D
.3
.2
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
.4
N-D
N-D
1.0
10.3
2.3
14.3
COMBINED
SLUDGE
35S3
7B219
773
.3
333B4
NOT RUN
26227
30.4
8774
.4
.1
N-D
.2
.3
N-D
.7
N-D
.2
1.1
I 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
.3
L 0.1
N-D
.2
.2
N-D
N-D
t 0.1
3.9
.2
I 0.1
N-»
L 0.1
L 0.1
.3
.3
N-D
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
.2
.5
29.9
SECONDARY
SLUDGE
637
698
16.4
L 0.1
1060
NOT RUN
443
IBS
0.1
0.1
N-D
O.I
N-D
N-D
0.1
O.I
O.I
O.I
0.1
0.1
O.I
0.1
O.I
N-D
.1
N-D
H-D
N-D
N-D
.3
H-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
0. 1
O.I
0.1
.6
-------
MASS BALANCE IN LBB.
PLANT 11
PER IIAV
FRACTION
METALS
NON-COHV. METALS
00
CO
A
PARAMETER
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
ZINC
ALUMIHUH
BARIUM
BORON
CALCIUM
COBALT
IRON
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
MOLYBDENUM
SODIUM
TIN
TITANIUM
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
INFLUENT
78.3
22»
30.8
.2
20,3
I.I
6.1
«2.y
290
57. 1
71.4
28643
28.1
JOB
11399
14. 8
22.1
44814
33.4
4.3
2.8
,2
TOTAL OUT
47.7
27B
49.0
.4
19.3
1.0
2.7
72.0
_
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
PRE-CL
EFFLUENT
19. Q
90.7
40.4
I 0.1
13.4
,9
2.2
31.1
101
17.1
80. 9
23924
37.8
48.9
28394
12.7
28.8
43424
24.7
1.7
2.8
4.9
COMBINED
SLUDGE
47.9
179
8.4
.3
3.9
.1
.3
40.9
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
SECONDARY
SLUDGE
.8
.2
I 0.
L 0.
t 0.
L 0.
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
HOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
tiLLUNUAKY SLUUOE 18 NOT INCLUDED IN TOTAL OUT COLUMN
POILU1ANTS NOT LISTED UERE NOT DETECTED
I-LESS THAN! H-D NOT DETECTED)
•"•'LIMINARY DATA ONLY TO BE VERIFIED
-------
PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF POLLUTANT PARAMETERS
PLANT 11
PARAMETER
1rIf1-TRICHLOROETHANE
Irl-DICHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLQROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
ANTHRACENE
PHENANTHRENE
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM-
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
ZINC
BENZENE
1,2-TRANS-DICHLOROETHYLENE
ETHYLBEHZENE
HETHYLENE CHLORIDE
!-• PHENOL
£> NAPHTHALENE
00 BIS<2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
CHLOROFORM
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
2.4-DIHETHYLPHENOL
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
ALDRIN
MERCURY
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
ALPHA-BHC
BETA-DHC
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
CHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROETHANE
1i3-DICHLOROPROPYLENE
METHYL CHLORIDE
DICHLOROBROMOMETHANE
TRICHLOROFLUOROHETHANE
ACEHAPHTHENE
1> 2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1>2-BENZANTHRACENE
CHRY6ENE
IIEPTACHLOR
OAMHA-BHC
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED HERE NOY DETECTED AT ANY SAMPLE POINT
UNCONFIRMED PESTICIDES HERE ASSUMED NOT DETECTED
NUMBERS IN PARENTHESES ARE THE NUMBER OF SAMPLES TAKEN
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY-TO BE VERIFIED
INFL-
UENT
100
100
100
100
100
too
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
too
100
100
100
too
B3
83
03
93
83
83
83
47
67
SO
33
33
33
17
17
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
PRE CL.
EFFL
4) 100
4> 33
4) 100
4> 50
41 100
4) 47
4) . 0
6) 0
4> 100
4) 100
4) 100
41 100
4) 100
A» 100
4) 109
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) tOO
4) 47
4> 17
4) 33
4) .83
4) : 0
4> 0
4) 100
4) 83
4) 33
4> 0
4) 33
4> SO
4> 17
At 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 17
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
SEC.
EFFL
4> 100
4> 17
4> 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) 93
4)
*>
4)
4>
4»
4)
4)
4>
4)
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
4) 0
4) 100
4) 17
4> 83
4> 47
4) 0
4» 0
4) 100
4) 33
4) 33
4) 0
4) 17
4) 83
4> 0
4) 17
4) 0
4) 0
4) 33
4> 0
4> 0
4> 0
4) 0
4) 17
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 17
4) 33
COMB.
SLDO
4> 0
4> 100
4) 47
4) 100
4) 47
4> 33
.4) 33
4) 33
100
100
too
, 100
100
too
100
100
100
100
100
4) 100
4) 100
41 100
4) 83
41 50
4) 17
4) 100
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
4) 0
) iOO
4) 33
4> 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 47
4) 83
4) 0
4) 50
4> 0
4) 17
4) 17
4) 0
4> 17
4) 17
41 0
4) 0
SEC.
' SLDO
4> 0
4) 100
4) 47
4) 100
4> 47
4) 0
41 0
4) 0
4» IOO
4> 100
4> IOO
4> 100
4) 100
4) 100
4> 100
4) 17
4> IOO
41 100
4) 100
4> 83
4> 17
4) 33
4> 47
4) 17
4) 0
4) 100
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 47
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
4) 50
4> 0
4) 17
4> 33
4> 0
4) 17
4) 0
4> 0
4> 0
4) 0
4) 0
( 4> 0
4>
4>
4>
4>
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4>
4)
. 4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4>
( &)
( 4)
-------
SUMMARY Qf ANALYTICAL DATA
PLANT
FRACTION
CONVENIIONALS
NON-CONVENT10NALS
H-
CD
VULAIILES
PARAMETER
BOO
TOTAL SUSP. SOLIOS
COO
OIL t CREASE
TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS
TOTAL OISS. SUL10S
SEITLEABLE SOLIDS
TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDS
VOLATILE OISS. SOU OS
TOTAL VOL. SUS. SULIDS
AMMONIA NITROGEN
TOC
BENJENE
CARBON TETRACHLOKIDl
CHLOROBEN2ENE
,2-OICHLOROEIHANE
.1.1-TMICIILOaOETHANt
,1-OICHLQKOEIHANE
.li2-IRICHLOHOEThANE
•1.2.2-IETRACHLukOCTHANE
HLOROETHANE
HLOROFOKM
,2-TRANS-OICHLOKOETHYLENE
,2-OICHLOROPkOPAKE
ETHYLBEN2ENE
HETHYLENE CHLUKlOt
HEIHYL CHLORIDE
IR ICHLURQFLUOKOntlltANE
01CHLOROOIF LUUROHE THANE
TETRACHLUROElMYLtNE
TOLUENE
IKICHLOROEIIirLE'NE
VINYL CHLOK10C
2-CHLOROPHENOL
PHENOL
AGIO EXTRACT
BASE-NLUIRALS 1.2-0
PULLUIANIS NOT LISTED HERE NEVER LiEUCILD
L-LLSS THANI N-D NOT OETEClEOi
PKELIHINARY DATA UNLY — TO BE VERH-ILU
UNITS
HC/L
HC/L
HC/L
HC/L
UC/L
HC/L
HC/L
HL/L
HC/L
HC/L
HC/L
HC/L
HC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
iNf LULNI
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
I
106
178
372
46
36
1055
83C
6
310
192
90
18
59
4
10
41
10
1
10
31
23
100
10
0
5
L
I
L
I
L
I
I
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
SECONDARY PCNI
EFFLUENT rt£H.
10
14
107
9
20
835
613
0
1'Jb
164
9
13
17
0
0
1
1
22
10
1
10
8
7
28
10
,
1
90
92
71
80
47
21
2
100
38
4
90
28
71
84
67
50
90
46
74
70
72
BO
I
1
I
L
t
I
L
L
L
L
L
I
L
PRIMARY
EFFLUENT
75
90
267
33
83
940
844
1
233
212
61
17
50
1
1
1
1
34
1
1
1
10
2
1
1
5
58
10
1
10
56
36
61
10
1
4
PRIMARY
SLUDGE
959
4150
4773
NOT RUN
51
4434
5333
66
2961
2533
2942
31
508
2
N-D
1
1
0
23
0
N-D
7
N-0
292
0
24
11
2
5
6
N-0
113
0
17
N-0
N-0
SECONDARY
SLUDCE
2563
9825
12240
NOT RUN
50
9043
NOT RUN
521
6394
NOT RUN
6375
24
1683
1
N-0
1
N-0
N-0
0
N-0
1
N-0
0
1
N-0
N-0
3
N-0
1
N-0
N-0
14652
N-0
292
N-0
400
UC/L
10
L 10
N-0
N-0
-------
SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL DATA
PLANT 12
. FRACTION
BASE-NEUTRALS
.PESTICIDES
METALS
GO
ff>
A
NON-CONV. HETALS
PARAMETER
FLUORANTHENE
ISQPHORONE
NAPHTHALENE
BISI2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
BUTYL BENZYL PHIHALATE
DI-N-BUTVL PHTHALATE
DI ETHYL PHTHALATE
1,2-BENJANIHRACENE
CHRYSENE
ANTHRACENE
PHENANIHRENE
PVRENE
ALPMA-BHC
CAHHA-BHC
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUH
CADHIUH
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
HERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
THALLIUM
ZINC
ALUMINUM
BARIUH
CALCIUH
IRON
HAGNESIUH
MANGANESE
SODIUM
UNITS
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
NG/L
NG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
NG/L
UC/L
UC/L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
MC/L
UC/L
HC/L
UC/L
HG/L
INFLUENT
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
9
16
2
20
3
3
3
30
37
145
50
2
17*
414
922
691
SB
517
16V
50
4
100
1615
366
24*
B4
2686
32
109
1*5
I
t
L
I
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
I
SECONDARY PCNI
EFFLUENT KEH.
3
16
2
10
5
27
42
50
2
15
4B
66
375
24
200
121
50
2
100
267
36
94
76
257
32
77
140
50
63
27
71
91
66
91
56
59
61
26
50
83
90
61
10
91
29
3
PRIMARY PRIMARY
EFFLUENT SLUDGE
L 3
3
1
21
L 5
I 6
L 6
L 3
L 3
1
1
L 3
33
39
266
147
153
251
440
688
177
185
533
272
134
2
134
1100
329
329
79
1705
32
248
143
4
N-0
8
425
II
16
to
N-0
N*D
37
37
11
N-0
N-D
1113
11
L 6
970
3217
6183
2940
122
8333
677
17
80
17
12083
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
SECONDARY
SLUOGt
7
N-0
6
965
N-0
7
47
13
13
5
5
39
N-0
N-D
1297
19
L 6
10046
28620
44540
3370
400
17167
3172
41
144
16
66560
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOt RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED HERE NEVER DETECTED
L-LESS THANI N-D NOT DETECTED!
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY —TO BE VERIFIED
-------
MASS BALANCE IN UBS. PER PAY
PLANT 12
M1f2>2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
HLOROETHANE
HLOROFORH
•2-TRAN8-OICHLOROETHYLENE
.2-DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYLBENZENE
HETHYLENE CHLORIDE
HETHYL CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROFLUORONETHANE
DICHLOROD1FLUOROHETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROEIHYLENE
VINYL CHLORIDE
2-CHLOROPHENOL
PHENOL
1> 2-DIPHENYLHYDRAZIHE
FLUORANTHENE
NAPHTHALENE
BI6<2-ETHYLHEXYL> PHTHALATE
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
1i2-B£NZANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE
ANTHRACENE
PHENANTHKENE
PYRENE
INFLUENT TOTAL
324*5 13740
55707 48031
116203 63934
14245
11.7 6.4
329440 304032
259209
99231 91438
39976
28062 32330
5423 4MB
18482 11829
N-D 1 0.
N-D L 0.
N-D L 0.
N-D L 0.
19. B 3.
.2 .
N-D 1 0.
N-D L 0.
.3 10.
.9
.3 1 .
N-D 1 0.
3.2
12.7 7.
N-0 1 0.
N-D L 0.
N-D 1 0.
9. A 2,
7.3 37. (
31.2 8.
N-D .1
.1 N-l
l.S
.3 N-
N-D L 0.
.5 L 0.
4.1 7.
N-D L 0.
N-D L 0.
N-D
N-D L 0.
N-D 1 0.
N-D
N-D
N-D
SECONDARY
OUT EFFLUENT
2948
4373
33S28
2759
6.2
240761
2S3803
61746
37415
2739
3903
S362
N-D
N-0
N-D
N-D
3.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
H-D
.3
N-0
N-D
N-D
A. 9
N-D
N-0
N-0
1 2.4
> 2.2
I 8. 6
3 N-0
J N-0
t N-D
9 N-D
N-0
N-D
3.0
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-0
N-D
2 N-D
2 N-D
2 N-D
PRIMARY SECONDARY
SLUDGE SLUDGE
4795 5977
20742 22916
23857 28549
NOT RUN NOT RUN
.3 •»
22159 21093
26654 NOT RUN
14798 14914
12660 NOT RUN
14702 14869
157 36.4
2341 3926
N-D L 0.1
L 0. t 0.1
L 0. L 0.1
L 0. N-D
L 0. N-0
L 0.1
1 0. N-0
N- L 0.1
1 0. N-0
N- I 0.1
1. L 0,1
L 0. N-D
N-D
L 0. I 0,1
1 0. N-0
L 0. I 0.1
L 0. N-0
N- N-D
34.2
L 0. N-D
1 0. .7
N-D N-D
N-D .9
N-D N-D
L 0. L 0.1
L 0. L 0.1
2. 2.3
1 0. N-0
L 0. L 0.1
L 0. .1
N-D L 0.1
N-D I 0.1
.2 L 0.1
.2 I 0.1
L 0.1 L 0.1
POLLUFANTS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED
L-LE8S THANI N-D NOT DETECTED)
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY TO BE VERIFIED
-------
MASS BALANCE IN IBS. PER DAY
PLANT 12
FRACTION
PESTICIDES
METALS
NON-CONV. HETALS
H"
r/i
8
/I
PARAMETER
ALPHA-BHC
OAMHA-BHC
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
CADHIUH
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
THALLIUM
ZINC
ALUMINUM
BARIUM
CALCIUM
IRON
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
SODIUM
INFLUENT
I 0.1
I O.I
43.3
H-D
34. 3
12?
288
278
18.1
.2
Sl.l
H-D
1.3
N-D
304
114
76.1
24133
902
10100
34.2
49190
TOTAL OUT
L 0,1
L 0.1
21. 6
I Oil
32.6
78.2
142
140
8.9
L 0.1
48.5
.2
.7
.1
299
_
-
-
-
-
-
-
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
L O.I
L 0.1
13.0
N-D
4.6
14.9
24; 9
117
7.4
N-D
37.7
H-D
H-D
H-D
83.3
11.2
29.4
23688
80.4
9944
23.9
43837
PRIMARY
SLUDGE
N-D
N-D
3.6
L O.t
4.8
16.1
30.9
14.7
.6
L 0.1
3.4
u 0.1
.4
L 0.1
60.4
NOT RUH
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUH
NOT RUN
HOT RUN
NOT RUN
SECONDARY
SLUDGE
N-D
N-D
3.0
L 0.1
23.4
67.2
104
7.9
.9
L 0.1
7.4
L 0.1
.3
L 0.1
153
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUH
HOT RUN
NOT RUN
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED HERE NOT DETECTED
L-LES9 THANI N-D NOT DETECTED*
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY TO RE VERIFIED
-------
PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF POLLUTANT PARAMETERS
PLANT 12
GT
C£
A
to
CJ
PARAMETER
1. I . 1-IRlCHLOROEIHANE
CHLOROFORM
Him bENZENE
HETHYLENE CHLORIDE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
PHENOL
61642-ETHYLHEXYLk PHTHALATE
ANTIMONY
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
ZINC
TRICHLOROETHYLEME
SILVER
I.I-DICHLOROCTHANE
NAPHTHALENE
OAMHA-BHC
2-CHLOROPHENOL
ALPHA-bHC
CHLOROETHANE
1 ,2 TRANS-OICIILOROETHYLENE
1.2-DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
CHLORObENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROEIHANE
1i1.2-TRICHLOROETHANE
I.1.2r2-TETRACHLOROETHAN£
1,2-DICHLOKOFROPANE
METHYL CHLORIDE
TRI CHI OfcOFl UOROME THANE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
FLIIORANTHENE
1SOPHORONE
BUTYL bENZYL PHTHALAIE
DI N-bUIYL PHTHALATE
[lit THVL PHTHALATE
I.2-bEN2ANIHRACEN£
LHR'YSENE
ANTHRACENE
I lit HAHllll.LNt
^ VM HE
/IK SI III!.
bt h VI L II/M
SLI LN1IJM
hOLIUTANTS NOT 1ISTED UERE NOT HEIECIED
UIK 4INFIKMED PESTICIDES UERE ASSUMED NOT
NIIHbt'RS IN PARENTHESES ARE THE NUHbER OF
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY.-TO BE VERIFIED
INFL-
UENT
100 (
100 <
100 <
100 (
100 (
too <
too <
100 (
100 (
100 (
100 <
100 <
100 <
100 (
100 (
100 <
100 <
63 <
83 (
47 (
SO (
SO <
33 <
33 (
17 <
17 (
17 4
0 <
0 4
0 <
0 <
0 <
0 <
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
4)
4)
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4)
4k
4k
4k
4k
4)
4k
4k
4)
4k
4)
4)
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4)
41
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4)
4k
4k
4)
4)
4k
4)
4k
4)
4)
4)
4)
4k
4)
4)
f R-IM.
EFFL
100 4 5k
100 4 5k
100 4 3k
100
100
100
63
too
too
100
100
100
100
100
63
100
100
100
so
60
33
47
0
33
0
0
0'
o
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
17
Q
o
0
o
0
17
17
0
17
3k
3k
3k
4k
4k
4k
4)
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
3k
4)
3k
4k
4k
4k
4k
Sk
3k
4k
9k
3k
3k
Sk
3k
3k
3k
5k
Sk
5k
3k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4)
4k
17 44k
17 44k
SEC,
EFFL
100 4 4k
100 4 4k
0 4 4k
100 ( 4k
100 4 4k
47 4 4k
0 4 4k
100 4 4k
47 4 4k
100 4 4k
100 4 4k
100 < 4k
100
33
0
too
100
100
0
0
0
47
0
17
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
4)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Q
0
0
Q
0
0
o
0
4k
4k
4k
4k
41
4k
4)
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4)
4k
4k
4k
4k
PRIM.
SLDG
33 4k
0
63
100
0
100
0
100
100
100
too
100
100
17
83
100
too
33
100
63
17
o
0
0
33
100
o
too
0
33
SO
17
0
17
17
63
30
100
33
0
17
SO
33
0
0
SO
so
so
100
0
100
4)
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4)
4k
4)
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
SEC.
SLDQ
0
17
0
17
0
100
17
100
100
100
100
100
100
17
100
100
100
0
100
17
17
0
0
o
0
33
o
63
0
30
0
0
33
0
0
17
0
too
33
0
0
17
SO
SO
so
17
17
83
100
0
4k
4)
4k
4k
4k
4k
4)
4k
4k
3k
5k
3k
4k
4k
4k
3k
3)
4k
3k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4)
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4)
100 4 4k
AT ANY SAMPLE POINT
DETECTED
SAMPLES TAKEN
-------
PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF POLLUTANT PARAMETERS
PLANT J2
INFL- FRIMi SEC. PfllM. SEC.
PARAMETER UENT EFFL EFFL SLDP SLDO
THALLIUH 0 { il 17 < 6) 0 < 6> »7 ( A> 47 I t>
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED MERE NOT DETECTED AT ANY SAMPLE POINT
UNCONFIRMED PESTICIDES HERE ASSUMED NOT DETECTED
NUMBERS IN PARENTHESES ARE THE NUMBER OF SAMPLES TAKEN
PRELIMINARY DATA OHLY-IO BE VERIFIED
-------
SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL DATA
PLANT 13
FKACT1ON
CONVENIIONALB
NON-CONWENT I ONALB
VQLATILE8
H-
A
ACID EXTRACT
BASE-NEUTRALS
CtSllLIDtS
PARAMETER
BOD
TOTAL SUSP. SOt. IbS
COD
OIL I OREASE
TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL 60LIDB
TOTAL DIBS. SOLIDS
SEITLEABLE SOLIDS
TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDS
VOLATILE DISS. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOL. BUS. SOLIDS
AMMONIA NITROGEN
TOC
BENZENE
1 > I (1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CHLOROFORM
1.2-TRANS-DICHLOROETHYLENE
E fHYLBENZENE
HETHYLENE CHLORIDE
DI CHLOROflROHOME THANE
TRICHLOROFLUOROHETHANE
CI4LORODI BROHOHEIHANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
IRICHLOROETHYLENE
2>4-DINITROPHENOL
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENOL
FLUORANIHCNE
NAPHTHALENE
BI8<2-ETHYLHEXYL> PHTHALATE
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
1r2-BENZANIHRACENE
11112-BENZOFLUORANTHENE
CHRY8ENE
ANTHRACENE
FLUOMENE
PIIENANTHRENE
PYRENE
OAHHA-BHC
PCB-1242
f-CB-1254
UNITS
HO/L
HO/I
HO/L
HO/L
UO/L
HO/L
HO/L
HL/L
HO/L
HO/L
HO/L
HO/L
HO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
US/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
NO/L
NO/L
NO/L
INFLUENT
L
I
L
1
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
I
L
L
L
L
L
49
ISO
245
34
27
891
704
4
230
194
103
17
49
1
1
7
1
3
3
1
1
1
11
10
4
I
3
1
3
2
12
3
2
3
3
10
3
3
3
3
3
100
23033
1483
I
L
L
I
I
I
1
L
L
L
L
1
I
t
L
L
L
L
I
L
L
L
L
PRE-CL
SECONDARY PCNT
EFFLUENT REM.
IS
13
49
13
13
739
493
1
123
130
7
2
9
3
1
0
3
2
V
3
2
3
3
10
S
3
3
3
3
14
273
300
78
91
82
38
44
17
2
73
47
33
93
88
82
84
47
100
91
90
63
47
100
23
99
44
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
I
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
TERTIARY
EFFLUENT
10
4
34
12
17
720
722
1
141
170
3
1
9
1
1
8
1
1
I
3
1
1
0
1
1
3
1
1
3
2
14
3
2
3
3
10
3
3
3
3
3
19
62
83
PRIHARY
6LUDOE
8330
93000
33847
4223
231
36370
12300
998
28143
3730
34230
133
8447
13
N-D
N-D
38
24
34
N-D
43
N-D
N-B
eaio
N-D
N-D
N-D
402
113
12
3131
270
178
N-D
07
34
87
173
20
173
130
N-D
N-D
N-D
SECONDARY
6LUDOE
4784
38293
22247
417
44
27410
NOT RUN
868
13127
NOT RUN
77790
13
343O
4
N-D
N-D
1
N-D
23
N-D
17
N-D
N-D
9322
N-D
N-D
N-D
291
33
43
1479
278
13
7
N-D
H-D
N-D
143
N-D
143
32
N-D
N-D
N-D
r-OILUTANTS NOT LISTED UERE NEVER DETECTED
LI ESS THAN! N-D NOT DETECTED)
PERCENT KEMOVAL BASED ON PRECHLORINATED SECONDARY EFFLUENT
PKEl IH1NARY DATA ONLY TO BE VERIFIED
-------
SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL DATA
PLANT 13
FRACTION
HETALB
NON-CONV, HETALS
*
PARANETER
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
THALLIUM
ZINC
ALUMINUM
BARIUM
CALCIUM
IRON
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
SODIUM
UNITS
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
NO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
HO/L
UO/L
NO/L
UO/L
HO/L
INFLUENT
L 50
L 90
L 2
35
117
2122
SB
47
I 10
L 50
?
L 100
233
2543
130
88
2212
34
I3B
42
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
PRE-CL
SECONDARY PCNT
EFFLUENT REH.
30
30
2
3
24
333
20
200
10
50
2
100
30
102
4?
BO
113
32
113
5?
?5
79
74
44
78
87
»3
42
?
?5
4
17
5
L
L
L
I
L
L
L
I
L
L
TERTIARY
EFFLUENT
50
30
2
5
34
4454
20
200
10
50
2
100
35
103
2?
BO
SI
31
4?
SB'
PRIMARY
SLUDGE
102
378
344
22217
33100
104117
24000
84033
4047
47
303
5
104317
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
SECONDARY
SLUDGE
34
192
153
9247
14747
29033
10447
33000
2110
50
916
4
43317
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED UERE NEVER DETECTED
L-LESS THAN! N-D NOT DETECTED!
PERCENT REMOVAL BASED ON PRECHLORINATED SECONDARY EFFLUENT
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY TO BE VERIFIED
-------
HA88 BALANCE IN LBS. PER DAY
PLANT 13
FRACTION
CONVENTIONAL8
NON-CONVENTIONALS
PARAMETER
BOO
TOTAL SUSP.
COD
OIL I OREASE
SOLIDS
VOLATILE8
Co
/I
ACID EXTRACT
BABE-NEUTRALS
TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL BUI 108
TOTAL DI8S. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDS
VOLATILE DI88. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOL. SUB. SOLIDS
AMMONIA NITROGEN
TOC
BENZENE
1.1.I-TRICHLDROETHANE
CHLOROFORM
1r2-TRAHS-DICHLOROETHYLENE
ETHYLBENZENE
HETHYLEHE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHTLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
2>4-DINITROPHENOL
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENOL
FLUORANTHENE
NAPHTHALENE
BI6(2-ETHYLH£XYL> PHTHALATE
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
OI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
1.2-BENZANTHKACENE
11.12-BENZOFLUORANTHENE
CHRYSENE
ANTHRACENE
FLUORENE
PHENANTHRENE
PYRENE
OAHHA-BIIC
PCb-1242
PCB-1234
AN1 ItlONY
ARSENIC
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED MERE NOT DETECTED
I IES8 THANI N-D NOI DETECTED)
MIEI IHINARY DATA ONLY TO BE VERIFIED
ht IAI S
INFLUENT
8773
19073
31732
4431
3.4
113493
90000
29230
24704
13382
2124
4224
N-D
U 0.1
.9
N-D
,3
.3
N-D
1.1
1.3
.a
.1
.4
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
1.4
N-fl
.3
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
3.2
.2
N-D
N-D
N-D
7.0
TOTAL OUT
173430
1003944
388774
I922B
2.9
794071
-
403744
-
1971884
333
94387
. 1
N-D
.1
I O.I
L O.J
.4
.4
I 0.1
242
N-D
N-D
I 0.1
7.4
.9
1.1
44.6
7.0
.8
.2
L O.|
L 0.1
1 O.|
3.7
I 0.1
3.7
.9
I O.I
L O.I
N-D
.»
b.O
4. I
243
PRE-CL
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
1423
1483
S407
1704
1.7
81818
74943
13444
14421
79B
144
942
N-D
N-0
.1
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
N-D
L O.I
N-D
N-D
N-D
I 0.1
t 0.1
N-D
N-D
1.0
N-D
.3
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-0
L O.I
L 0.1
N-0
N-D
N-D
N-D
.4
PRIMARY
SLUDGE
4243
47481
24923
2112
.1
29273
4247
14044
1874
27114
74.4
4232
L O.I
N-D
N-D
L O.|
L 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
H-D
4.4
N-D
N-D
N-D
.3
L 0.
t 0.
1.
.
L 0.
N-
L 0.
L 0.
L 0.
L 0.
L 0.
L 0.
L 0.
N-D
N-D
N-D
L O.I
.2
.2
II 1
SECONDARY
BLUDOE
149342
9349BO
334444
13410
1.1
484960
NOT RUN
376034
NOT RUN
1943972
312
91213
.1
N-D
N-D
L O.I
N-D
.4
.4
N-D
238
N-D
N-D
N-D
7.3
.8
1.1
42.0
4.9
.4
.2
N-
N-
N-
3.
N-
3.
.6
N-D
N-D
N-D
.8
4.8
3.9
232
-------
HAB8 BALANCE IN LBS. PER DAY
PLANT 13
FRACTION
HETALS
NON-CONV. HETALS
PARAMETER
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
BELENIUH
SILVER
THALLIUM
ZINC
ALUMINUM
BARIUM
CALCIUM
IRON
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
SODIUM
INFLUENT
14.9
270
7.3
L O.I
N-D
N-D
1.2
N-D
2V. 7
327
14.5
11194
292
4270
17. S
7991
TOTAL OUT
39?
B39
27S
.8
53.7
1.3
23.1
,1
11BB
_
-
-
-
-
-
-
PRE-CL
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
2.6
tl .5
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
3.3
20.2
5.4
B900
12.5
3490
12.7
4537
PRIMARY
SLUDGE
14.3
52.0
13.0
I 0.1
3.0
L 0.1
.2
L 0.1
33,2
HOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
HOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
SECONDARY
SLUDGE
349
726
242
.8
52.7
1.3
22.9
.1
1132
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
B
**
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED HERE NOT DETECTED
L-LES9 THAN* N-D NOT DETECTEDI . >
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY TO BE VERIFIED
-------
PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF POLLUTANT PARAMETERS
PLANT 13
A
PARAMETER
CHI OROFOKM
METHYIENE CHLORIDE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
8IS<2~ETHYLHEXYLt PHTHALATE
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
t EAD
SILVER
ZINC
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
ETHYLBENZEME
Dl N-6UTYL PHTIIALATE
PCB-1242
1.1.1-IRICHLOROETHANE
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENOL
PCB-I23«
MERCURY
2.4-DINITROPHENOL
BENZENE
I,2-TRAN8-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BICHLOROBROHOHE THANE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
CIIL ORODI BfcOHOHE THANE
FLUORANTIIENE
NAPHTHALENE
BUTYL BENZYL PHIHALATE
1)1 ETHYL PHIHALATE
1.2-BENZANTHRACENE
11.12-bENZOFLUORANTHENE
CHfcYSENE
ANTHRACENE
FLUORENE
PHENANTHRENE
PYRENE
OAHMA-BHC
ANTIHONY
AK8ENIC
CADHIUH
NICKEL
3Ei ENIUH
IIIAtl 1IIH
INFL-
UENT
100
100
100
100
100
too
100
100
100
100
100
83
47
67
67
30
33
33
33
33
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Pfc£ CL.
EFFL
At 67
At 17
At 50
At 0
41 100
At SO
At 83
At 100
At 0
At 0
At 100
At 0
At 0
At 100
At 33
4) 0
4) 17
4) 17
4> 0
At 0
A) 0
A> 0
At 0
A> 0
A) 0
A> 0
A) 0
A) 0
A) 0
A) 0
A) 0
A> 0
At 0
4) 0
A) 0
A) 0
A) 0
A) SO
A) 0
A) 0
A) 0
4) 0
A) 0
4) 0
TERT.
EFFL
A> 100
A) 33
A) 17
A) 0
A) 100
A) 0
At 100
A> 100
A) 0
A> 0
A) 100
A) 0
A) 0
A) 100
A) 17
A) 0
At 33
A) 30
A) 17
A) 0
At 0
At 0
At 0
At 100
At 0
A) A7
At 0
At 0
At 0
At 0
At 0
At 0
At 0
At 0
At 0
At 0
At 0
At 30
At 0
At 0
At 0
At 0
At 0
At 0
PRIM.
BLDQ
At 0
A) 83
A) 0
A) 100
At 83
At 100
At 100
At 100
At 100
At 100
At 100
At 0
At 83
At 30
At 0
At 0
At 0
At 83
At 0
At 100
At 0
At |00
At 83
At 0
At 30
At 0
At 30
At 17
At 33
At 0
At 33
At 33
At 33
At 83
At 33
At 83
At A7
At 0
At 100
At 100
At 100
At 100
At 100
At 33
SEC.
SLBG
At 0
At 83
At 0
At 100
At 83
At 100
At 100
At 100
At 100
At 100
At 100
At 0
At 0
At 33
At 0
At 0
At 0
At 83
At 0
At 100
At 0
At 83
At 17
At 0
At 30
At 0
At 17
At 17
At 33
At 17
At 0
At 0
At 0
At 17
At 0
At 17
At 17
At 0
At 100
At 100
At 100
At 100
At 100
At 33
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
31
At
At
At
3t
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
3)
At
A)
At
At
At
At
fUllUIANTS NOI LISTED UERE NOT DETECTED AT ANY SAMPLE POINT
UNCONFIRMED PESTICIDES WERE ASSUMED NOT DETECTED
NUHbERS IN PARENTHESES ARE THE NUMBER OF SAMPLES TAKEN
>KLI IMINARY DATA ONLY-TO BE VERIFIED
-------
SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL DATA
PLANT 11
FRACTION
CONVENTIONALS
NON-CONVENTIONALS
VOLATILES
H- •*"
G °
en .
PARAMETER
BOD
TOTAL SUSP. SOLIDS
COO
OIL C CREASE
TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS
TOTAL OISS. SOLIDS
SETTLEABLE SOLIDS
TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDS
VOLATILE DISS. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOL. SUS. SOLIDS
AMMONIA NITROGEN
TOC
ACRYLONITRILE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLQRIDE
CHLOROBENZENE
.2-OICHLOROETHANE
,1,1-TRlCHLOROETHANE
HLOKOFORH
.1-OICHLOROETHYLENE
•2-TRANS-DICHLOROETHYLENE
i2-DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYLBENZENE
HETMYLENE CHLORIDE
METHYL CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROFLUOROHETHANE
TETRACHLOROETIIYLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
2t4-OICHLOROPHENUL
PHENOL
BENZIDINE
2.4-DINITROTOLUENE
FLUORANTHENE
NAPHTHALENE
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED HERE NEVER DETECTED
L-LESS THANI N-D NOT DETECTED!
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY TO BE VERIFIED
ACID EXTRACT
BASE-NEUTRALS
UNITS
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
UG/t
HG/L
MG/t
ML/L
MG/L
MG/L
Mt/L
HG/L
HG/l
U&/L
UG/l
UG/t
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
INFlUtNT
261
190
573
31
21
791
632
16
323
123
156
7
222
t 100
9
10
L 5
I 5
74
27
13
5
0
23
2058
7
L 5
25
73
73
0
6
I 20
1
L 20
1
10
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
I
L
L
L
L
L
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
13
9
61
9
7
502
506
1
104
68
6
5
50
too
3
5
5
5
1
12
5
5
5
5
46
20
5
0
1
0
50
60
20
20
20
20
83
PCNT
REM.
95
95
89
71
67
37
20
9*
68
45
96
29
77
6?
lo
99
56
62
78
98
100
99
100
OTHER
INFLUENT
261
511
3233
40
35
1263
528
28
577
NOT RUN
389
18
300
14
3
2
1
11
L 5
2
L 5
L 5
L 5
1
10
0
I 5
13
120
7
4
6
L 20
0
L 20
L 20
9
COMBINED
SLUOGE
1068B
64525
43920
1608
304
38072
NOT RUN
917
20283
NOT RUN
37286
66
10145
N-D
N-0
N-D
N-0
N-O
N-0
N-0
N-0
49
N-0
303
124
N-D
9
N-0
26857
N-D
N-0
1528
N-0
N-0
14
N-D
2687
SECONDARY
-SLUOGt
2/60
11616
11462
397
83
8922
NOT RUN
633
5249
.NOT RUN
9072
22
1709
N-D
0
N-0
N-D
N-0
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-0
N-&
1
0
N-D
N-0
N-0
1952
N-0
N-0
387
1
N-D
N-D
N-D
1268
-------
SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL DATA
PLANT H
fHACIION
1>ASE-NEUTRALS
PESTICIDES
MtlALS
H-
CD
NON-CONV. METALS
PAHAHtTER
BUTYL BEN2YL PHTHALATE
OI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
D1ETMYL PHTHALATE
ANTHRACENE
PHENANIHRENE
PYRENE
4,4'-UDI
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUM
CAOHIUH
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
THALLIUM
I INC
AL UH INUM
BARIUM
UUHON
CALCIUM
COBALT
IRON
MACNESIUM
MANGANESE
HULYBOENUM
SODIUM
TIN
TITANIUM
VANADIUM
¥ UK I UH
UMTS
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
NC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
NC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
MC/L
UC/L
UC/L
HC/L
UC/L
UC/L
MC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
SECONDARY PCNT
INHUtuT EFFLUENT REM.
1
10
1
1
0
I 10
L 1000
5
4
L I
L 2
155
291
337
7
333
394
6
7
1
799
1507
112
571
58
103
5043
16
231
57
91
79
176
9
4
L 20
3
L 20
L 20
L 20
L 10
L 1000
2
1
0
L 2
19
29
160
11
L 1000
266
L 2
0
L 1
90
213
15
368
54
124
427
15
163
31
66
36
22
7
4
70
60
IS
68
90
53
32
67
100
89
86
87
36
7
92
6
29
46
3
54
68
22
OTHtfc COMBINED
INFLUENT SLUOCE
I 20
3
0
I 20
L 20
I 10
200
9
27
1
6
1138
669
596
416
2667
546
5
219
3
2633
11236
643
639
60
67
30683
19
674
103
70
187
601
25
9
N-0
12
N-0
34
34
41
N-0
138
107
L 6
297
32950
32267
41783
7250
33633
3056)
14
243
2
149833
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
SECONDARY
SLUOCE
N-0
N-0
N-0
N-0
N-0
28
N-0
80
36
L 6
26
3650
1550
883
1817
21500
3750
7
119
L 10
20417
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT HUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT HUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
HlllUJIAIIIi NUT LISTED MERE NEVER UEIECILD
L-LESS IIIANI N-0 1401 OL1ECIEUI
PKtLlHINAMY UAIA UNLIT 10 BE VlKIFUU
-------
MABB BALANCE IN LB8. PER DAY
PLANT 14
FRACTION
CONVENTIONALB
NON-CONVENTIONAL8
VOLATILE3
CD
A
PARAMETER
BOD
TOTAL SUSP, SOLIDS
COD
OIL I GREASE
TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS
TOTAL DISS. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDS
VOLATILE DISS. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOL. BUS. SOLIDS
AHHONIA NITROGEN
TOC
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
1•1•I-TRICHLOROETHANE
CHLOROFORM
1r1-DtCHLOROETHYLENE
1.2-TRANS-DICHLOROETHYLEME
I.2-DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYLBENZENE
HETHYLENE CHLORIDE
METHYL CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROFLUOROHETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
2,4-DlCHLOROPHENOL
PHENOL
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
FLUORANTHENE
NAPHTHALENE
BI8(2-ETHYLHEXYL> PHTHALATE
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
ANTHRACENE
PHENANTHRENE
PYRENE
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
SECONDARY SLUDGE IS NOT INCLUDED IN TOTAL OUT COLUMN
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED
L-LESS THANI N-D NOT DETECTED!
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY TO BE VERIFIED
ACID EXTRACT
BASE-NEUTRAL8
METALS
INFLUENT
24214
17724
53470
2072
2.0
73813
58743
30088
11307
H537
484
20481
t
t
4.
2.
t.
.
t 0.
2.
172
.4
N-D
2.3
4.8
4.8
L 0.1
.5
L 0.1
N-D
L 0.1
.7
L 0.1
.7
L 0.1
t 0.1
L 0.1
N-D
.5
.4
N-D
N-D
14.5
27.1
31.4
.7
TOTAL OUT
8344
43854
34728
2014
.8
72174
-
23235
-
25407
554
11457
.3
N-D
L 0.1
1.1
N-D
I 0.1
N-D
.2
4.4
1.7
L 0.1
L 0.1
18.0
1 0.1
N-D
1.0
N-D
L 0.1
N-D
7.5
N-D
.3
N-D
L 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
.3
.2
L 0.1
.2
23.8
24.2
42.7
5.8
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
1244
ess
5440
807
.4
44803
47177
7718
4277
540
478
4474
.3
N-D
L 0,1
1.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
4.3
1.7
N-D
L 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
7,7
N-D
.3
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
.2
L 0,1
L 0.1
N-D
1.8
2.7
14.7
1.0
CONFINED
SLUDGE
7122
42797
27248
1205
.2
25371
NOT RUN
13517
NOT RUN
24847
57.5
4741
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
1 0.1
N-D
.2
L 0.1
N-D
I 0.1
N-D
17.7
N-D
N-D
1.0
N-D
I 0.1
N-D
1.8
N-D
I 0.1
N-D
L 0.
I 0.
1 0.
L 0.
L 0.
N-D
.2
22.0
21.5
27.8
4.8
SECONDARY
SLUDGE
22771
74740
75480
3304
,7
74323
NOT RUN
43724
NOT RUN
75571
180
14234
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
H-D
N-D
N-D
0.1
0.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
14.3
N-D
N-D
3.2
N-D
N-D
N-D
10.4
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
.2
,7
.3
N-D
.2
30.4
12.7
7.4
15.1
-------
MASS BALANCE IN LB9. PER t'AY
PLANT 14
METALS
NON-CONU. HETALS
PARAMETER
MERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
THALLIUM
ZINC
ALUMINUM
BARIUM
BORON
CALCIUM
COBALT
IRON
MAGNESIUM
HANOANE6C
MOLYBDENUM
SODIUM
TIN
TITANIUM
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
INFLUENT
L 0.1
34.7
.4
.7
L O.I
74.3
141
10.3
93.1
3411
9.4
471
1442
21.3
3.3
B303
7.3
14.4
.a
.4
TOTAL OUT
L 0.1
4S.2
.6
.2
L O.I
ioa
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
N-D
24.8
N-D
L 0.1
N-0
B.4
19.9
1.4
34.3
304?
11.3
39.9
1348
13.2
2.9
8143
3.4
2.1
.7
.3
COMBINED
SLUDGE
I 0,1
20.4
I 0.1
.2
L 0.1
99. a
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
SECONDARY
SLUDGE
.2
31.2
I O.I
1.0
N-D
170
NOT RUM
NOT RUN
HOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
03
A
CJ
btCOMDAKV SLUbOE IS NOT I MCI DUE [I IN TOIAL OUT COLUMN
I-IHIUIAHIS HOI LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED
1 -LESS I It AH I N-D HOI DETECTED!
PttELIMINARY DATA ONLY TO BE VERIFIED
-------
PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF POLLUTANT PARAMETERS
PLANT 14
§
PARAMETER
1.1 > 1-TRICIILOROETHANE
CHLOROFORM
11 2-TRAMS-DICHLOROETHYLENE
TETRACHLOROETHYLCNE
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYLf PHTHALATE
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
NICKEL
SILVER
ZINC
HETHYLENE CHLORIDE
TOLUENE
PHENOL
ETHYLDENZENE
TRICIILOROETIIYLENE
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
BENZENE
t.l-DICHLOROETHYLENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
1.2-DICHLOROPROPAHE
METHYL CHLORIDE
2.4-DICHLOROPHENOL
2i4-D1NITROTOLUENE
NAPHTHALENE
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
ANTHRACENE
PHENANTHRENE
LEAD
MERCURY
SELENIUM
THALLIUM
ACRYLONITRILE
CHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
DICHLOROBROHOHETHANE
TRICHLOROFLUOROHETHANE
FLUORANTHENE
PYRENE
4r1'-DDT
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
INFL-
UENT
.100
100
100
100
100
100
too
too
too
100
100
100
100
83
S3
93
47
47
47
sa
30
33
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
OTHER
INFL.
4) 0
4) 47
4> 0
4) 100
4) BO
4) 100
At 100
4>. 100
4> 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
i> 100
4> 47
4) 100
4) 100
4) SO
4) 33
4) BO
4> SO
4) 0
4) 20
4) 33
4) 0
4) 17
6) 17
4) 20
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 100
6) 100
4) 17
4) 1?
4) 17
4) 17
4» 17
4> 0
4) 0
4) 0
41 0
4) 17
4) 47
4) 83
SEC.
EFFL.
4> 17
4) 100
4) 0
4> 33
3) 100
4) 100
4) 33
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
4> 100
4) 33
4) 100
4) 47
4) SO
4> 0
4) 0
4> 33
3) 40
4> 63
4) 0
S) 0
4) 0
4> 0
4) 17
4) 0
S) 0
S> 0
S) 0
S> 0
S) 0
4) 17
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
S) 0
S) 0
4> 0
4) 17
4) 0
CllHB.
sum
( 4> 0
1 4> 0
( 4> SO
4> 0
51 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) IOO
4) 100
4> 17
4> 100
3) 100
4> IOO
4) 0
3) 17
4) 0
4) 0
S) 6
4) 0
41 0
4> 0
3» 0
S> 0
9) 0
3) 0
S) 17
3) 17
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) 17
4) 0
4> 0
4> 0
4> 0
4) 17
S) 17
3) 33
4) 0
4) 0
4) 100
SEC.
BLDG
4> 0
4> 0
4> 0
4) 0
4) 100
4> IOO
4) 100
41 100
4> 100
4) 100
4) 10O
4) 100
4) 100
4) 17
4) 100
4) 47
4) 33
41 0
4) 0
4) 17
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4> 100
4> 100
4) 83
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 17
4) 0
4) 0
4) 100
TAP
WATER
4) 0 <
4) 100
4> 0
4) 0
4) 100
4) 100
4) 0
4) 100
4> 100
4) 0
4> 0
4> 0
4> 100
4) 0
4) 100
4) 0
4> 0
4) 0
4) IOO
4) IOO
4> 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4> 100
4) 0
4> 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 100
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
4) 0
4) 0
1 )
1)
1 >
1>
1)
1)
1>
1)
1)
>
1)
11
1)
1>
1)
1)
1)
1>
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
I)
l>
1>
t>
1)
1)
1)
1)
1>
1)
1)
1)
1>
1)
1>
1)
1)
1>
1)
( 1)
< 1)
( 1)
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED AT ANY SAMPLE POINT
UNCONFIRMED PESTICIDES WERE ASSUMED NOT DETECTED
NUMBERS IN PARENTHESES ARE THE NUMBER OF SAMPLES TAKEN
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY-TO BE VERIFIED
-------
SUHMAKY Of ANALYTICAL GAIA
PLANT 1!>
CONVENT lllNALS
NON-CONVENTIONALS
VOLATILE*
O
ACID EXIKACI
BASE-NEUTRALS
PARAMETER
BOO
TOTAL SUSP. SOLIDS
COO
OIL I CREASE
TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS
TOTAL 01SS. SJLias
SEITLtAfiLE SOLIUS
TOTAL VOLATILc SJLIOi
VOLATILE UISS. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOL. SUS. SOLIbS
AMMONIA NITROGEN
TOC
BENIENE
l,<>-DICriLUKUETHAi4t-
1.1,1-THICHLUrfOLIHAKE
1. 1-OICHLOROE IHANt
CHLOROFORM
1 il-OICliLUHUt IHYLt-Nt
l,2-TRANS-UIC,U_OI
-------
SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL DA IA
FLANT 15
FRACMON
BASE-NEU1RALS
PESTICIDES
METALS
o
A
NON-CONV. METALS
PARAMETER
PHENANTHRENE
PVRENE
OIELORIU
IIEPTACHLOR
CAHHA-BHC
PCB-1242
PCB-125*
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
ZINC
ALUMINUM
BARIUM
CALCIUM
IRON
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
SODIUM
LH1IS
UC/L
UC/L
t.O/L
NC/L
NC/L
NG/L
M./L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
liC/L
UO/L
LG/L
UC/L
UC/L
NC/L
UC/L
UC/L
tC/L
UC/L
LC/L
UG/L
MC/L
UC/L
MG/L
UC/L
MC/L
INFLOUNI
I 3
L 3
7
L 200
27
4133
L 3600
L 50
L 50
L 2
1
9
56
125
9
463
96
L 50
11
145
569
104
47
732
6
67
39
I
t
I
I
I
t
L
I
L
L
L
SECONDARY KCNT
EFFLUENT RtH.
3
3
150
5
43
817
03
50
50
2
2
5
25
6>0
20
200
13
50
t
36
111
32
49
252
7
60
37
80
44
57
59
86
32
75
00
69
66
Jl
5
Uliltf
INFLUENT
L 3
L 3
L 330
20
67
9708
75
L 50
L 50
I 2
I 2
23
b4
147
15
417
2
L 50
11
343
615
bO
45
619
7
90
46
CtMIMNED
SLUUCL
68
2H7
H-li
N-0
N-0
N-0
H-D
2
-------
FRACTION
COHVtHfIOHALS
NON-CONVENTIONAL8
VOLATILE8
to
o
CO
/\
ACID EXTRACT
BASE-NEUTRALS
PESTICIDES
PARAMETER
BOD
TOTAL SUSP. SOLIDS
COD
OIL I GREASE
TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS
TOTAL DI8S. SOLIDS
TOTAL OOLAIILE SOLIDS
VOLATILE DI68. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOL. 8US. SOLIDS
ANMONIA NITROGEN
TOC
BENZENE
•2-DICHLOROETHANE
>ItI-TRICHLOROETHANE
,I-DICHLOKOETMANE
HLOROFORH
t1-DICHLOROETHYLENE
t2-TRAN8-DICHLOROETHYLENE
r2-DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYLBENZENE
NETNYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENOL
HEXACHLOfcOBENZENE
Fl UORANTHENE
BI8<2-ETHYLIIEXYL> PHTHALATE
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-6UTYL PHTHALATE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
11.12-BENZOFLUORANTHENE
ANTHRACENE
PHENANTHRENE
PYRENE
DIEIDRIN
KEPT ACM OR
GAHMA-BHC
PCB-1242
FCU-1254
AN IIhONY
ANSENIC
MASS BALANCE IN LBS. PER DAY
PLANT IS
INFLUENT TOTAL OUT
6303
7199
13812
1944
3524
14234
13400
732
1 .8 2.
24930
12308
6340
3782
4931
374
8980
t
I 0.
3.
L 0.
,
L 0.
HE L 0.
L 0.
,
N-
(
.
•
t
•
24788
-
11143
-
9392
407
4473
I 0.
4
1
N-0
,
L 0.
L 0.
1
1
1
N-0
I 0.
1
N-D
L 0.
*
1
1
N-0
•
,
L 0.
1
1
1
N-D
N-
N-D L 0.
N-l
ATE .1
.
> 1 0.
» 1.
t 0,
.3
.2 L 0.
N-D 1 0,
N-D 1 0.
N-D L 0.
N-D 1 0.
L 0.
N-
N-D L 0.
t 0.
L 0.
.2 L 0.
N-D 1 0.
N-D L 0.
N-D
D
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
D
1
1
1
1
1
1
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
344
1442
3242
201
2.4
19787
13822
4813
1297
840
402
3490
N-D
N-D
.1
N-D
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
.1
N-D
, |
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
.3
N-D
L 0.1
I 0.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
I O.I
I O.I
L O.I
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
COMBINED
SLUDGE
2938
14772
10138
331
L 0.1
7001
NOT RUN
4328
NOT RUN
8332
4.3
983
L O.I
N-D
N-D
L O.I
N-D
N-D
I 0.1
N-D
L 0.
I 0.
N-
L 0.
.
L 0.
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
I 0.1
i
L 0.
L 0.
N-
L 0.
L 0.
L 0.
L 0.
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
.1
OTHER
INFLUENT
2333
4371
9042
927
2.4
14009
9444
5723
3221
3174
313
SOU
N-D
N-0
.1
N-0
.2
N-D
0.1
N-D
O.I
.3
0.1
O.I
N-D
O.I
0.1
0.1
N-D
N-D
.4
0,1
.1
.2
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
0.1
O.I
.3
0.1
N-D
N-D
OIIIER INFLUENT IS NOT INCLUDED IN TOTAL OUT COLUMN
POILUFANIS NOT LISTED UERE NOT DETECTED
1 ItSS THAN* N-D NOT DETECTED*
PKEI IHINARY DATA ONLY TO BE VERIFIED
-------
FRACTION
HETALS
NABS DALANCE IN LB8. PER DAY
PLANT IS
NON-CONV. HETALS
PARAHETER
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
ZINC
ALUMINUM
BARIUM
CALCIUM
IRON
HAONEBIUN
HANOANE3E
BODIUM
INFLUENT
N-D
I 0.1
.3
3.2
4.B
.3
I O.I
3.2
N-D
.4
7,9
31.2
S.7
234?
40.1
347
4.B
2138
TOTAL OUT
L 0.1
L 0.1
1.3
S.S
33.4
1.7
L 0.1
1.4
L 0.1
L 0.1
17.2
_
-
-
-
-
-
-
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
N-B
N-0
N-D
1.3
23. B
N-D
N-D
.0
N-D
N-D
2.0
6.6
l.B
2814
12.7
304
2. A
1973
COMBINED
SLUDOE
L 0.1
I 0.1
1.3
4.2
7.6
1.7
t O.I
.4
L 0.1
L 0.1
15.2
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
OTHER
INFLUENT
N-D
N-D
.4
1.7
4.0
.4
0.1
0.1
N-D
.3
9.4
14.8
1.4
1238
17.0
192
2.S
1243
OTHER INFLUENT IS NOT INCLUDED IN TOTAL OUT COLUMN
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED
L-LEBS THAN* N-D NOT DETECTEDI
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY TO BE VERIFIED
-------
PERCENT OCCURRENCE Of POLLUTANT PARAMETERS
PLANT IS
O
en
A
PARAME1ER
DENZENE
1.1iI-TRICHLOROETHANE
UILOKOFORM
MtTHVLENE CHLORIDE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHt OKOEtlirLENE
b!6<2 ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
DI-N-bUTYL PIITHALATE
DIETHYL PIITHALATE
COPPER
CYANIDE
HILUER
ZINC
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
CHROMIUM
MERCURY
NICKEL
EMIYLbENZENE
PENTACULOROPHEMOL
PHENOL
PCfi-1242
2-1RANB-DICHLOROETHYLENE
1 -bICHLOROETHANE
EAb
2-DICIILOROETMANE
1 -DICIILOROETHYLENE
2-DICHLOROPROPANE
OIELDRIN
GAHHA-bHC
CAt'HIUH
11CHLOKUDROMOHE THANE
IRICHI OKOFlUQROMETHANE
IIEXACHI OROBENZCNE
H UURANTHENE
II.12-BENZOFLUORANTHENE
ANIHRACENE
PHENANIHRENC
PYKENE
IIEPTACIILOR
PCb-1234
AN1IMONY
A I. tit MIC
btKVI I IUM
btl LIIIIIH
INFL-
UENT
100
100
100
100
100
too
100
100
100
too
100
too
100
100
83
81
61
ei
47
67
47
47
30
11
11
17
17
17
17
17
17
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4>
6)
6)
6)
6)
41
4>
4)
4)
4)
4>
3>
4)
4)
4>
4>
4)
4)
4»
4)
4>
4)
4»
4>
4>
4>
4)
4>
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
41
OTHER
I NFL.
0
too
100
ei
100
0
100
100
100
100
100
100
47
100
81
too
100
17
SO
17
so
81
13
0
11
0
0
0
0
17
0
0
SO
0
0
Q
0
0
0
17
17
0
0
0
0
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
3)
4>
4>
4)
4>
4)
4>
4)
4)
4>
41
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
SEC.
£FFL
0
47
81
100
100
SO
0
too
81
17
100
100
11
too
0
0
0
81
0
0
17
31
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
31
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
17
0
0
0
0
4>
4>
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
S)
4)
4)
4)
4»
4>
4)
4>
4>
4>
4>
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
41
4>
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
cone.
SLOG
too
0
0
100
so
100
100
100
100
0
100
100
100
itoo
100
100
100
100
too
0
0
0 \
73 ]
75
100
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
23
73
23
SO
50
73
0
0
100
100
25
100
4>
4>
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
3>
2>
3>
4>
4>
1>
4)
11
4)
4)
4>
4)
! 4)
1 4)
I 4)
[ 4>
4»
1 4)
4)
4>
3>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4>
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
TAP
HATER
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
too
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 )
t>
1)
1 )
1)
1 )
< 1>
< 1)
< 1)
< 1)
< 1)
< 1
< 11
< 1)
( 1)
< 1)
( 1)
< 1>
( 1>
< 1)
< 1 )
( 1)
( 1)
( 1)
< 1)
< 1)
< 1)
( 1>
< 1)
< 1)
( 1)
< 1)
< 1)
< »
< 1)
< u
< 1)
< I)
( 1)
( 1 )
( 1)
( 1)
( 1)
( 1)
< 1 )
KMllMANIfl NOT LISTEli ULfiE NOT DETECTED AT ANY SAMPLE P01NI
UNCONMKHEb PEbTICIDES UERE ASSUMED NOT DElELTtD
NL'MDEKS IN PARENTHESES ARE THE NUMbEK OF SAMPLES TAKEN
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY-TO bE VERIFIED
-------
SUMMARY Or ANALYTICAL DATA
PLANT 16
01
O
FRACTION PARAMETER
CONV.. POD
TOTAL SUSP. SOLIDS
COD
OIL I GREASE
NON-CONV. TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS
TOTAL DISS. SOLIDS
SETTLEABLE SOLIDS
TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDS
VOLATILE PISS. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOL. SUS, SOLIDS
AMMONIA NITROGEN
TOC
VOLATILES BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
CHLOROBENZENE
1»2-D1CHLOROETHANE
Irlri-TRICHLOROETHANE
It1-DIGMLOROETHANE
lil.2-TRICHLOROETHANE
IiI,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
CHLOROFORM
i•\-DICHLOROETHYLENE
lf2-TRANS-DICHLOROETHYt.ENE
1r 2-DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYLBENZENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
METHYL BROMIDE
DICHLOROBROHOMETHANE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
VINYL CHLORIDE
ACIDS. 2.4.4-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2.4-DICHLOROPHENOL
2»4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
PENTACHLOROF'HENOL
PHENOL
BASE-NEUT. 1>2-DICHLOROBENZENE
Ir3-D ICHLOROBENZENE
1.4-DICHLOR08ENZENE
FLUORANTHENE
NAPHTHALENE
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED MERE NEWER DETECTED
L-LESS THAN! N-D NOT DETECTED!
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY TO BE VERIFIED
UNITS
MO/L
MO/L
MO/L
HG/L
UO/L
MO/L
MO/L
ML/L
MO/L
MO/L
MO/L
HO/L
MO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
L
L
t.
I
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
INFLUENT
214
217
553
41
34
734
481
12
284
47
144
17
84
i
2
1
0
21
0
0
10
37
1
1
1
t
38
20
0
1
44
33
13
20
2
1
2
3
32
18
3
3
3
1
28
4
L
L
L
t
I
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
SECONDARY FCNT
EFFLUENT REM.
11
14
121
4
IS
470
430
1
43
48
It)
9
21
1
28
0
1
0
0
S
20
0
1
2
1
2
20
2
2
0
1
1
2
3
?
3
2
7
2
95
?3
78
85
SB
34
4
92
7fr
94
47
75
100
23
83
87
94
97
85
47
97
89
75
50
OTHER
INFLUENT
282
198
447
34
40
714
531
8
315
77
132
12
144
i
377
t 1
0
52
3
L t
L 10
41
0
9
L 1
51
92
7
0
3
138
131
171
11
2
1
9
17
103
80
17
37
L 3
47
44
5
L
I
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
TERTIARY COMB.
EFFLUENT SLUDGE
11
4
43
12
11
424
445
t
109
50
3
9
19
0
0
7
1
1
1
0
5
20
1
1
1
0
1
20
2
2
2
4
1
2
3
3
3
2
4
2
150BI
54474
50400
3400
144
31591
NOT RUN
983
24479
NOT RUN
43583
120
2771
4
N-D
3
N-D
N-D
35
N-D
N-D
1
N-D
305
1
77
77
N-D
N-D
N-D
12
117
240
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N^D
N-D
N-D
ISO
1217
48
238
2317
355
COHP.
SLUDGE -2
21041
42112
84800
4933
393
44287
NOT RUN
997
34381
NOT RUN
51147
43
3833
14
N-D
7
N-D
N-D
598
N-D
N-D
4
N-D
733
4
412
111
N-D
N-D
N-D
241
418
1927
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
92
N-D
N-D
3727
203
3100
3150
577
-------
LUMHAfiV OF ANALVTICAI
PLANT 14
KACF ION f ARAHE UK
DI-N-IlUIYL FIITHAl ATE
BIETHYL FMIIIAl ATC
1 . 2-&EN2AF4FHRACENE
6ENZO 5
N-D
05
82
85
283
283
89
N-D
N-D
N-D
240
218
10
2627
19883
22533
36417
27490
75667
530?
28162
1373
43667
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
lOHLIIANTS NOT LISTED HERE NEVER DETECTED
L LESS THAN) HI' NOT DETECTED!
f KELIMINARY DATA ONLY TO E
-------
MASS BALANCE IN LB8. PER PAY
PLANT 14
A
PARAMETER
OOP
TOTAL SUSP.
COD
OIL I GREASE
SOLIDS
TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS
TOTAL DISS. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDS
VOLATILE DISS. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOL. 8U9. SOLIDS
AMMONIA HITROOEH
TOC
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLOR1DE
CHLOROBENZEHE
,2-DICHLOROETHANE
.t.1-TRICHLORUETHAHE
.1-DICHLORDETHAHE
rIt2-TRICHLOROETHAHE
,1.2r2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
HLOROFORH
rl-DICHLOROETHYLEHE
r2-TRANB-DICHLOROETHYLENE
r2-DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYLBEHZEHE
METHYLEHE CHLORIDE
METHYL BROHIDE
DICIILOROBROHOHE THAHE
TRICHLOROFLUORUHE THAHE
TETRACHLOROETHYLEHE
TOLUEHE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
VINYL CHLORIDE
2•4.4-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2t4-DICHLOROPHEHOL
2>4-DIHETHYLPHEHOL
PEHTACHLOROPHEHOL
PHEHOL
lr2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1>3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1> 4-DICHLORODENZEHE
FLUORAHTHENE
NAPHTHALEHE
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL> PHTHALATE
BUTYL BEHZYL PHTHALATE
DI-H-BUTYL PHTHALATE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED MERE NOT DETECTED
L-LESS THANI N-D NOT DETeCTEDI
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY TO BE VERIFIED
INFLUENT
1
203243
205434
524703
30562
34.0
198234
434428
270728
44724
195040
14120
7933B
.9
1.4
M-D
.2
19.4
.2
.3
N-D
34.8
H-D
.9
N-D
5.8
34.3
N-D
.2
N-D
43.4
31.3
12.3
N-D
N-D
.8
N-D
2.8
29.9
14. B
N-D
2.5
N-D
.8
24.1
3.3
2.5
5.8
INFLUENT
2
73187
31224
172914
8489
10.4
185712
137814
81703
19929
39511
3134
37307
.3
97.7
N-D
L 0.1
13.4
.4
N-D
N-D
10.4
L Oil
2.2
N-D
13.1
23.9
1.7
L 0.1
1.2
35.8
33.9
44.3
2.9
.5
.3
2.4
4.4
24.4
20.4
4.3
9.4
N-D
12.1
11.9
1.2
2.9
1 .5
TDTAL IN
274430
254482
497419
47251
44.4
883944
594242
352431
44455
194551
19274
114445
1.2
99.1
N-D
.2
33.0
.8
.3
N-D
47.4
L O.I
3.1
N-D
18.7
40.2
1.7
.2
1.2
79.4
45.2
54.4
2.9
.5
1.1
2.4
7.2
54.5
37.4
4.3
12.1
N-D
12.9
38.0
4.5
5.4
7.3
TOTAL OUT
44770
149371
242432
25944
13.7
417095
-
213834
-
134493
10935
31728
L 0.1
.8
.2
N-D
.4
.8
.2
.4
8.1
N-D
1.4
L 0.1
1.0
4.0
H-D
N-D
H-D
1.5
1.1
3.4
N-D
H-D
N-D
N-D
4.8
.1
1.8
.2
4.4
.4
4.3
11.8
1.3
1.7
N-D
TERTIARY
EFFLUENT
13284
3032
74483
14089
13.0
511433
537394
132034
40583
3422
10447
22542
N-D
.8
.2
H-D
.4
N-D
.2
.4
8.1
N-D
N-D
H-D
.4
5.8
N-D
H-D
H-D
1.2
.4
.4
H-D
H-D
H-D
H-D
4.8
H-D
1.8
H-D
H-D
H-D
H-D
4,2
H-D
.4
N-D
COMBINED
SLUDGE
25144
84437
79844
5705
.2
50059
NOT RUN
38789
NOT RUN
49042
190
4391
L 0.1
N-D
L 0.1
H-D
H-D
I 0.1
H-D
H-D
L 0.1
H-D
.5
L 0.1
.1
.1
H-D
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
.2
.4
N-D
H-D
N-D
H-D
H-D
H-D
H-D
.2
1.9
L 0.1
.4
3.7
.4
.3
M-D
COMBINED
SLUDGE 2
24322
77702
104093
4172
.5
55403
NOT RUN
43011
NOT RUN
44009
78,4
4795
t 0.1
H-D
I 0.1
H-D
N-D
,7
H-D
N-D
L 0.1
N-D
.9
t 0.1
.5
.1
N-D
H-D
H-D
.3
.5
2.4
H-D
H-D
H-D
H-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
4.7
.3
3.9
3.9
.7
1.0
) N-D
-------
nflbi VALANCE IN LtB. PER DAY
PLANT
o
05
A
PARAMETER
I'2-BENZAHTIIRACENE
BEM20 (A)PYRENE
CIIRYSCNE
ANTHRACENE
PMENANTIIRENE
PYRENE
4.4--DOD
ALPHA-BMC
OAHMA-BMC
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
2INC
ALUMINUM
BARIUM
CALCIUM
IRON
MAGNESIUM
HANOANE8E
UODIUH
INFLUENT
1
N-0
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-0
L O.I
L O.I
M-D
24.6
N-D
4.4
37. a
124
249
108
.4
72.4
N-D
4.8
203
1301
138
308IQ
1221
3931
44.8
83131
INFLUENT
2
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
L O.I
N-D
N-D
N-B
N-D
7.1
44.2
47.4
79.4
34.2
.4
24.0
N-0
17.8
89.2
210
30.4
9440
432
1297
14.7
18414
TOTAL IN
N-0
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-0
N-D
.1
1. 0,1
M-D
24.8
M-D
11.9
122
172
349
144
1.0
94.4
N-D
24.4
292
1311
189
40438
1439
3248
41.9
101947
TOTAL OUT
. 1
.1
.7
.7
.2
L 0. 1
L O.I
.2
.8
1.7
L O.I
4.2
34.9
91.4
230
83.0
.4
74.3
39.4
1.9
123
_
-
-
.
-
-
-
TEKIIAKY
EFFLUENT
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
L O.I
I 0.1
.2
N-D
N-D
M-D
N-D
23.8
4.0
172
4.8
.2
49.4
N-D
M-D
37.2
18.9
12.9
19429
132
4831
38.2
98421
COMDINED
SLUDGE
L 0.1
N-D
L 0.1
.3
.1
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
.9
1.4
L O.I
.9
7.8
17.2
32.4
41.8
L O.I
4.1
.2
.2
30.9
NOT RUN
HOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUM
NOT RUM
MOT RUN
COMBINED
SLUDGE 2
.1
N-D
. I
.4
.4
, 1
M-0
N-D
N-D
.1
.3
L O.I
1.3
24.9
28.2
49.4
34.4
t. 0.1
4.4
39.2
1.7
94.4
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUM
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED UERE NOT DETECTED
L tESS THAN! N-D NOT DETECTED!
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY TO bE i/EKIFIED
-------
PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF POLLUTANT PARAMETERS
PLANT 16
PARAMETER
If If1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CHLOROFORM
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
BI8<2-ETHYLHEXYL> PHTHALATE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
CADHIUH
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
SILVER
ZINC
BENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
J.2-TRAN8-DICHLOROETHYLENE
PHENOL
1.2-DICHLOROBENZENE
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
NAPHTHALENE
8AMHA-BHC
ARSENIC
1f2-PICHLOROETHANE
It1-DICHLOROETHANE
1>1r2-TR1CHLOROETHANE
DICHLOROBROHOHETHANE
2f4-DICHLOROPHENOL
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
1f 4-DICHLOROBENZENE
ALPHA-BHC
CHLOROBENZENE
1r1t2t 2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
It1-D1CHLOROETHYLENE
1f2-BICHLOROPROPANE
METHYL BROMIDE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
CHLORODIBROHOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
2f4r6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2f4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
1r 3-DICHLOROBENZENE
FLUORANTHENE
1f 2-BENZANTHRACENE
BENZO (A)PYRENE
CHRY8ENE
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED
UNCONFIRMED PESTICIDES HERE ASSUMED NOT
NUMBERS IN PARENTHESES ARE THE NUMDER OF
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY-TO BE VERIFIED
JNFL- OTHER SEC. TERT. COMB. COMB, TAP
UEMT INFL. EFFL EFFL, BLPB SLDG-2 MATER
100
100
100
100
100
too
too
100
100
100
100
100
100
too
100
100
too
83
B3
67
47
67
67
SO
33
33
33
33
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
0
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4> 67
4) 10O
4) 100
4) 100
4) 83
4> 100
4> 100
4) 10O
At 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
6) 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) 47
4) 100
4) 47
4) 100
4> 100
4) 100
4> B3
4) 67
6> 100
6) 0
4) 0
6) 17
6) 100
6> 0
6) 17
6) 17
6> 67
6) 67
6) 17
6) 0
4) 0
6) 33
6) 0
6) 33
6> 67
4) 0
6) 33
6) SO
4) 17
6) SO
6) 0
6) 0
4) 0
6) 0
6> 17 ( 6) 33
6) 100 < 6) 50
4) 100
6) 10O
6) 83
6) 67
4) 100
4) 17
f > SO
4) 100
i) 100
») 10O
6) SO
6> 83
4) 100
4) 100
6) 100
4> 0
6) 33
6) 0
4) 17
6) 33
4) 0
6) 83
6) 100
6) 0
6) SO
6) 17
6) 0
6) 0
4> 0
6) 33
4) 0
6) 17
6) 0
6) 83
4) 17
6) 17
6) 0
6) 0
6) 0
4) 0
6) 0
6) 0
6> 0
4) 17
6) 0
6) 0
6) 0
4) 0
4) 100
6) SO
4) 33
4) 33
6> 50
6> 0
4> 0
6> 10O
6> 63
6) 100
6) 17
6) 100
6> 100
6) 0
4) 100
6> 0
4) 0(6) 0
6) 17 ( 4> 50
4) 100
4) SO
6) 83
6) 100
4) 100
6) 0
6) 100
6) 100
4) 100
6) 100
6> 100
6) 67
6> 100
6> 100
6> 100
6) 100
6) 33 < 6> 100
6) 0 < 6) 100
6) 0 ( 6» 0
6) 17
6) 0
6) 17
6) 17
6) 0
6) SO
4) 0
6) 0
6) 0
4> 17
4) 0
6) 0
6> 33
4) 0
6) 50
6) 17
4) 17
6) 0
6) 0
6> 0
6> 0
4) 0
6) 0
4) 0
6) 0
6) 0
6) 0
4) 0
6> 0
6) 0(6) 0
4) 0
4) 100
4) 100
6) 0
4) 83
6) 0
6) 100
4) 0
6) 100
4) 0
6) 0
6) 0
6) 0
4) 17
4) 0
6) 67
4) 0
6) 0
6> 17
6) 0
6) 0
6) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
6) 17
6) SO
4) 17
6) 0
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) 0
6) 100
4 > 1 00
41 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) 67
4) 100
6) 100
4) 10O
6) 100
4> 100
4> 100
4) SO
6) 0
4) 100
6) 100
4> f
4) 100
4) 0
4) 100
4) 0
4) 100
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
6) 0
4) SO
4) 0
4) SO
6) 0
4) 0
6) 33
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
6) 0
6> 0
6> 0
6) 0
4> 100
4) 83
6) 17
4) 17 < 4) 83
4) 0
6> 100
4) 0
6) 0
6) 0
6) 0
4) 0
6) 0
4) 0
6) 0
6) 0
6> 0
6) 0
4) 0
6) O
4) 0
6) 0
6) 0
6) 0
4) 0
6> 0
6) 0
6) 0
4) 0
6) 0
6) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
6) 0
4) 0
4) 100
6) 0
6) 0
6) 0
6> 0
6) 0
4) 0
6> 0
6) 0
6) 0
6) 0
6) 100
4> 0
6) 0
6> 0
6) 0
6) 0
6) 0
6> 0
6) 0
1)
1)
|
1
1
t
>
>
1)
i>
1)
)
>
)
)
1)
)
)
>
1)
1>
1)
1)
)
>
>
)
1)
1)
I)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
>
)
CTED AT ANY 8AHPLE POINT
NOT DETECTED
ER OF SAMPLES TAKEN
-------
f'ERCENJ OCCURRENCE Of POLLUTANT PARArtETlRb
PLANT 14
PARAMETER
ANIIIRACCNE
f HENANTHRENE
IrKtNE
H. « ' -flllll
ANTIMONY
BERYLLIUM
SELENIUM
INFL-
UENT
0 (
0 I
0 (
0 (
0 (
0 (
0 (
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
OTHER
INFL.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
SEC.
EFFL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
li)
4)
4)
4)
1ERI
EFFL
0
0
0
17
0
0
0
.
< 4)
( 4)
( 4)
( 4>
( 4)
< 4)
< 4)
COMB.
SLOG
100
100
SO
0
100
47
eo
4)
4)
4)
4)
S>
4)
3)
COMb
Sl-liO-
100
too
83
0
too
so
too
T
4)
4)
4)
4>
5)
4)
3>
TAf
WAT
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
en
01
HIIIIHANTS NOT LISIEb UEKE NOT DETECTED AT AN* SAMPLE POINT
nm.ONf IfvMtti PESTICIDES WERE ASSUMED NOT I'EIECIED
miHbt-'KS IN PARENTHESES ARE THE NUMBER OF SAMPLES TAKEN
l-KELIMINAftr [(ATA ONLY-TO b£ VERIFIED
-------
SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL DATA
PLANT II
FRACTION PARAMETER
CONY. BOD
TOTAL SUSP. SOLIDS
COD
UIL C GREASE
NON-CONV. TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS
TOTAL DISS. SOLIDS
SETTLEAULE SOLIDS
TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDS
VOLATILE DISS. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOL. SUS. SOLIDS
AMMONIA NITROGEN
IOC
VOLATILES BENZENE
CARBON TETKACHLORIDE
.I.1-TRICHL010ETHANE
il-DICHLUROETHANE
tn ,1.2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
01 HLUROFURH
i2-TRANS-DlCHLOROETHYLENE
,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYLDENZENE
HETHYLENE CHLORIDE
METHYL CHLORIDE
DICHLORODIF LUOKOME THANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENt
TOLUENE
TR1CHLOROETHYLENE
ACIDS. PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENOL
BASE-NEUT. FLUORANTHENE
NAPHTHALENE
BISJ2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTMALAlE
BUTYL BENZYL PHIHALATE
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
1,2-BEN/ANTHRACENE
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED HERE NEVER DETECTED
L-LESS THANJ N-0 NOT DETECTED!
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY---TO BE VERIFIED
UMTS
HG/L
HG/L
MG/L
HG/L
UG/L
HG/L
HG/L
ML/L
HG/L
Ht/L
HG/L
HG/L
HG/L
UG/L
UG/L I
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L I
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L L
UG/L I
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L L
IMLUINT
19*
129
77C
35
39
629
4t2
25
237
U'J
95
30
95
1
1
5*
1
1
2
3
1
31
22
25
20
124
7<
12
29
16
3
3
24
3
2
4
5
L
L
I
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
I
L
StCObDAKY
tFFLUtNT
13
9
127
21
22
441
444
1
ae
eo
t
IB
28
6
25
20
4
2
L
IB
1
3
2
9
2
3
3
5
PCNT
REM.
93
93
84
40
44
30
4
96
63
27
94
53
71
100
67
97
73
»7
97
92
38
94
33
63
33
25
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
I
I
L
L
I
L
L
OTHER
EFFLUENT
9
e
170
16
16
425
419
1
74
63
7
21
25
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
1
3
16
25
20
22
e
I
19
1
3
2
5
2
3
3
5
PRIMARY
SLUCGE
1695
1603
3320
152
66
2328
NOT RUN
97
1619
NOT RUN
1321
26
283
1
1
4
14
NTD
N-D
97
N-0
15
50
17
3
1
40
15
N-D
1B5
N-D
N-D
461
27
M-0
N-0
N-0
COMBINED
SLUDGE
45536
169167
64067
6817
448
55264
NOT RUN
1000
42101
NOT RUN
12V36J
108
4270
7
N-D
73
65
32
N-0
1620
79
307
479
N-D
47
14
517
20
177
63
169
707
5956
910
239
N-0
111
SECONDARY
SLUO&E
2819
3893
5687
488
173
3996
HOT RUN
913
2974
NOT RUN
3500
24
1179
0
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
51
N-0
21
1
N-D
5
N-D
833
2
N-D
580
N-0
112
1395
N-D
7
N-D
N-0
-------
SUHKAkY Of ANALYTICAL UAlA
PLANT 17
I-RACIIUN PARAMEUK
BASE-NEUI.
ANIHMACLhE
PHLNANTHKENc
CO
A
PESTICIDES MEPlACHLOk
ALPHA-UHC
6EIA-6HC
CAMMA-bHC
HEIALS ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
CAOMIUM
CHROHIUH
COPPLR
CYANIDE
LEAU
MtKCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
/INC
N-C HEIALS ALUMINUM
bARIUM
CALCIUM
1KUN
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
SODIUM
UMIS
UC/L
OC/L
UG/L
UG/L
NG/L
NC/L
NC/L
NC/L
UG/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UG/L
UC/L
NC/L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UC/L
MG/L
UG/L
MG/L
UC/L
MG/L
H.fLUtNI
L 5
L 3
I 3
I 3
2to
10
L 400
22
I 5C
I 50
27
100
1U5
277
ai
350
34
I 50
2C
272
956
110
55
1103
9
130
53
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
I
SECONDARY
IffLbtlH
5
3
3
a
100
50
20
21C
50
50
4
34
35
133
11
200
22
50
2
51
116
39
50
216
*
104
54
PCNT
HEM.
65
69
61
52
66
43
35
90
dl
66
65
9
60
20
OHiER
EFFLUEN
L 5
L 3
L 3
L 3
I 200
26
12
L 120
I 50
L 50
L 2
34
12
54
I 20
L 200
44
L 50
I 2
30
76
47
52
161
«
107
54
PRIMARY
I SLUDGE
N-0
31
31
N-0
N-0
N-0
N-0
N-0
L 50
16
78
177
596
537
592
19167
104
L 100
05
1163
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT HUN
COM81NEO
SLUDGE
111
460
460
165
N-0
N-0
N-0
N-0
156
282
1362
S717
16100
67517
12300
47000
1592
166
2900
31233
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NUT RUN
NOT RUN
HOT RUN
NOT RUN
SECONDARY
SLUDGE
N-0
N-D
N-0
N-D
N-0
N-0
N-0
N-0
L 50
16
357
610
1663
960
1167
24167
284
L 100
277
3317
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NUT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
H1ILLUIANIS NO I LISIEO MERE NEVE.K OLULTIU
L-ltSS IMANI N-0 NOT OtlLCHL/i
PRLLIIIINAKY UAIA UNL Y 10 6E VtKIMU
-------
MASS BALANCE IN LBB. PER DAY
PLANT 17
FRACTION
CONVENTIONALS
NON-CONVENTIONALB
VOLATILES
CO
PARAMETER
BOD
TOTAL 6USP. SOLIDS
COD
OIL I OREASE
TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS
TOTAL DIBS. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDS
VOLATILE DISS. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOL. BUS. SOLIDS
AMMONIA NITROGEN
TOC
DENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
lrl>l-TRICHLOROETHANE
1 r 1 -DICHLpROETIIANE
CHLOROFORM
I.2-TRANS-DICHLOROETHYLENE
ETHYLBENZENE
HETHYLENE CHLORIDE
NETHYL CHLORIDE
DICHLORODIFLUOROHETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENOL
NAPHTHALENE
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL> PHTHALATE
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
ANTHRACENE
PHENANTHRENE
HEPTACHLOR
ALPHA-DHC
BETA-DHC
OAMHA-BHC
ARSENIC
CADMIUM
CHROMIUH
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED
L-LESS THAN) N-D NOT DETECTEDI
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY TO BE VERIFIED
ACID EXTRACT
BASE-NEUTRALS
PESTICIDES
METALS
INFLUENT
23715
15733
95224
4245
4.7
77042
36392
29021
13327
lisa*
4494
11474
.1
N-P
4. 6
,1
.3
,4
3.0
2.7
H-D
N-D
IS. 2
9.8
1.5
3,4
2.0
.4
2.9
.3
.2
.3
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
L O.I
N-D
L O.I
N-D
3.3
13.2
22.4
33.9
9.9
L O.t
4.2
TOTAL OUT
12031
12447
34248
37BI
3.1
48493
-
21121
-
10499
2338
4057
I 0.1
I 0.1
L O.I
L 0.1
.4
.3
I 0.1
1.0
L 0.1
L O.I
.3
1.4
L o.i
2.1
1.4
.1
4.7
.1
.4
N-D
.1
.1
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
N-D
L 0.1
1.2
5.9
8.8
19.6
5.3
.1
3.5
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
1392
1041
13392
2351
2.4
34001
34327
10794
9794
735
2204
3429
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
N-D
,4
N-D
N-D
,8
N-D
N-D
.5
42
N-D
2.1
L 0.1
N-D
1.1
N-D
,4
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
I 0.1
N-D
N-Ii
.3
4.2
4.3
14.2 "
1.4
N-D
2.7
PRIMARY
SLUDOE
4917
4542
IJ55I
420
.3
9501
NOT RUN
4409
NOT RUN
3391
104
1133
L 0.
L 0.
L 0.
L 0.
N-
.
L 0.
.
L 0.
L 0.
L 0.
.2
L 0.1
N-D
.8
N-D
1.9
.1
N-D
N-D
.1
.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
.3
.7
2.4
2.2
2.4
L 0.1
,4
SECONDARY
SLUDOE
3522
4844
7105
610
.2
4993
NOT RUN
3714
NOT RUN
4373
30.0
1473
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
L O.t
L 0.1
N-D
L 0.1
N-D
1.0
L 0.1
N-D
.7
.1
1.7
N-D
L O.i
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
.4
1.0
2.1
1.2
1 .3
L 0.1
.4
-------
MASS BALANCE IN L§8, ft ft DAY
thAt 11 OH
MEIALS
NUN-CONV. METALS
PARAMETER
SILVER
ZINC
ALUMINUM
BARIUM
CALCIUM
IKON
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
SODIUM
PLANT 17
INFLUENT
TOTAL OUT
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
PRIMARY
SLUDGE
2.4
33.3
117
13.4
4753
135
1102
is.»
4310
15.0
.2
4.2
14.2
4.7
6143
24.4
12.8
4592
.3
4.7
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
SECONDARY
SLUDOE
.3
4.1
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
M
A
I (II IIIIA/IIS NOT LISTED Ut kt NO! l>tltCIt[i
L-IESS THAN* HI) NOT DETECTED)
f h'tLIMINAhV DATA ONLY TO &£ VERIFIED
-------
PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF POLLUTANT PARAMETERS
PLANT 17
fg
PARAMETER
1>1i1-TRICMLOROETHANE
CHLOROFORM
1>2-TRANS-DICHLOROETHYLENE
ETHYLRENZENE
HETHYLENE CHLORIDE
TETRACMLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
PHENOL
BIS<2-ETHYLIIEXYL) PHTHALATE
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
MERCURY
SILVER
ZINC
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
NICKEL
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
1i1-DICHLOROETHANE
NAPHTHALENE
BENZENE
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
HEPTACHLOR
ALPHA-BHC
8AHHA-BHC
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
1>1r2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
1r 2-DICHLOROPROPANE
METHYL CHLORIDE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
FLUORANTHENE
4•2-BENZANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE
ANTHRACENE
PHENANTHRENE
PYRENE
BETA-BHC
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
SELENIUM
INFL-
UENT
too
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
too
100
100
100
83
83
67
67
SO
30
33
33
17
17
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
SEC.
EFFL.
4) 33
4> 100
6> 0
6} 0
4) 100
4) 100
4) 67
( 6) 0
( 4) 47
( 41 100
4) 47
4) 63
4) 100
61 100
4) 33
4> 0
4) 33
4) 100
4) 47
4) 83
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
4) 0
4> 0
4) 83
6) 0
4) 0
6) 0
4) 0 ,
4) 0 *
4) 0
4> 0
4) 0
4) 0
6) 0
4) 0
61 0
4> 0
4) 0
61 33
4) 0
6) 0
4) 0
OTHER
EFFL
4) 100
4) B3
4) 0
At 67
4) 100
4) 100
4) SO
4> 47
4) SO
4) 100
61 0
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 83
4) 67
4) 100
4) 0
6) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 83
4) 0
4) 17
4) 0
61 0
61 0
4) 0
4) 0
61 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 17
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
PR I M .
SLtiO.
4) 17
4) 0
4) 100
4) 100
4) SO
4) 17
4) 100
4) 100
4) 33
4) 100
4) 100
61 SO
4) 100
3> 100
4) 100
4) 33
4) 83
61 100
4) 0
61 100
4) 17
4» 0
61 100
61 0
4> 33
4» 0
4) 0
4) 0
61 0
4) 17
4) 0
4) 0
61 33
4> 17
4) 0
4) 0
61 0
4) 33
4) 33
61 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 33
61 0
COMB.
SI. DO
4) 50
4) 0
4> 100
4) 100
4> 03
61 SO
4> 100
4) 17
4) SO
61 100
61 100
61 100
4) 100
4) 100
SI 100
4) 100
61 100
4) 100
4) 33
4) 100
4) 100
4) 0
4) 83
61 S3
4) SO
61 100
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 33
4> 100
4) 0
4) 33
4) 100
4> 83
4> 83
4) 83
61 83
4) 100
4) 0
S) 100
4) 100
5) 100
SEC.
51 DO
4) 0
4) 0
4> 83
4> 63
4> 17
4) 0
6) 100
4) 17
4) 47
4) 83
4> 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) SO
4) 100
4 ) 1 00
4) 0
4) 100
4) 0
6) 0
4> 0
4) 17
61 17
4) 17
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
4) 17
4) 0
4> 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
( 4) 0
( 5> 0
( 4) 17
( S) 0
TAP
WATER
4) 0 <
4> 100
4> 0
61 0
61 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
4) 0
4> 0
4) 0
4) 100
4) O
4> 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
4> 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 100
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
4) 0
4) 0
61 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
( 4) 0
( S) 0
( 4) 0
( S) 0
1 )
1)
1)
1)
1)
11
\ >
1)
1)
1)
1>
1)
1)
>
1)
1)
1)
I)
t>
1)
1>
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
t)
1)
1>
1>
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1>
1)
1)
1)
1)
( 1)
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED AT ANY SAMPLE POIMT
UNCONFIRMED PESTICIDES WERE ASSUMED NOT DETECTED
NUMBERS IN PARENTHESES ARE THE NUMBER OF SAMPLES TAKEN
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY-TO BE VERIFIED
-------
SUHMAKY Of ANALYTICAL DATA
PLAN1 16
CONVENT|ONALS
NUN-CUNVLNlIONALS
VULAIILES
BOO
TOTAL SUSP. SULIDS
COO
OIL C CREASE
TOTAL PHENOLS
10IAL SOLIDS
TOTAL OISS. SOLIDS
SETILEABLL SULIOS
TOIAL VOLAI ILL SOLIDS
VOLATILE UISS. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOL. SUS. SOLIDS
AHHONIA HI IROCEN
TOC
DEH2ENE
1 ,2-OICHLUfcUEIrUI*(:
1,1.1-TRlCHLONOEIHANL
1. I-OICHLOKOt IHAUt
1,1,2,2-TETKACHLGfcOElHANE
CHLOROFORM
1 ,2-TRANS-OICilLO^OLlHYLENl
MtltmCNt CHLOHIOL
TRICHLOKOFLUOKOHLlHANt
lEIHACllLOKOLlHYLExE
IQlUtt.t
IRICHLOKQtlMYLLNL
2-CHLUHOPHENOL
2 ,4-DICIILOkOPllLNLL
2,4-OlMEIIIYLPIIEIlLlL
ACID EXINACI
BASt-NLUIKALS NAPHIMALthL
B1S12-E IHYLHLXYLI PHIIIALAIt
ttUlYL BENiYL PHlMALAIt
01 -N-BUFYl CM1IIAI AIL
111 -N-UCI n HII MM Alt
UlLlllYL flllllUAlc
HIIL I HI 41.1 1, Nil) lliHU titKL NLVtK UtllCHO
1-llbS IIUNi N-U Illll bill I HIM
I Ml Inn.AKY ii4i* i./.i* 10 hL vlklMUi
UNITS
MC/L
MC/L
HC/L
MC/L
UC/L
MC/L
MC/L
ML/L
MC/L
MC/L
MC/L
MC/L
MC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
SECONDARY PCNJ
INFLUENT EFFLUENT KEM.
20B
260
717
46
5b
47b
216
11
l«,e
102
152
10
162
9
0
63
2
L 1
2
L t
12
SO
0
9
34
23
0
2
0
1
20
2
70
4
s
3U
I J
37 82
21 92
82 89
17 63
12 79
279 42
239
t 1 91
42 79
57 44
15 90
7 30
36 78
I
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
tt9
86
50
100
92
3 74
56
97
a?
50
L 2
I 5
0 100
L 2
4b 31
L 2 50
2 50
2 l>5
L 3
PRIMARY
SLUOCE
25243
162900
97333
9100
624
84607
NOT fcUN
997
44464
NOT *UN
96700
67
662
44
N-0
174
15
277
19
227
832
44
44
N-0
3V 8
245
20
144
N-0
N-0
113
311
4225
1231
35 J
94
H-D
SECONDARY
SLUDGE
6554
17933
17547
653
61
11039
NOT RUN
994
7511
NOT RUN
12866
10
369
1
N-0
N-0
4
12
N-0
4
6
2
N-0
N-0
31
3
N-0
N-0
t>-0
N-D
223
N-0
HO 72
44
J7
111
131
-------
SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL DATA
PLANT 16
BASE-NEUTRALS
^PESTICIDES
METALS
r\>
NON-CONV. METALS
PARAMETER
U2-BENZANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE
ANTHRACENE
FLUORENE
PHENANTHRtNE
PYRENE
CHLORDANE
ALPHA-BMC
GAHHA-BHC
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
ZINC
ALUMINUM
BARIUM
CALCIUM
IRON
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
SODIUM
UNITS
UG/L L
UC/L L
UC/L I
UC/L I
UG/L L
UG/L I
NC/L I
NG/L
NG/L
UG/L L
UG/L I
UG/L
UC/L
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
NG/L
UG/L
UG/L L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
HG/L
UG/L
MG/L
UG/L
HG/L
INFLUENT
5
5
3
3
3
3
2000
25
12
SO
SO
2
51
117
169
136
517
2*
50
15
330
4910
111
16
4103
4
162
45
L
I
I
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
SECONDAKY
EFFLUENT
5
5
3
3
3
3
33
52
63
50
50
2
11
6
11J
23
200
14
50
3
75
417
17
13
366
3
93
49
PCNT
HEM.
13
78
95
33
83
61
42
80
77
92
85
19
91
25
43
PRIMARY
SLUDGE
137
137
1123
214
1123
109
N-D
N-D
N-D
223
350
347
3350
14733
25250
25500
203333
1348
123
1078
32333
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
SECONDARY
SLUDGE
N-0
N-D
N-0
N-0
K-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
50
57
143
563
3283
5233
5200
4833
352
L 100
558
13950
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED HERE NEVER DETECTED
L-LESS THANI N-D NOT DETECUDI
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY---TO BE VERIFIED
-------
MASS BALANCE IN LBS. PER DAY
PLANT 18
F Ft ACT I OH
CONVENTIONAL8
MON-CONVENTIONAL8
VOLATILES
¥ K
A <**
ACID EXTRACT
BASE-NEUTRALS
I Ifal ft ll't H
Ml IAI S
PARAMETER
BOD
TOTAL SUSP, SOLIDS
COD
OIL I GREASE
TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS
TOTAL DISS. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDS
VOLATILE DISS. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOL. SUB. SOLIDS
AMMONIA NITROGEN
TOC
BENZENE
Ir2-DICHLOROETHANE
If I>|-TRICHLOROETHANE
ItI-DICHLOROETHANE
It If2f2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
CHLOROFORM
1f2-TRANB-DICHLOROETHYLENE
EIHYLBENZENE
HETHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICMLOROFLUOROMETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
2-CHLOROPHENOL
2f4-DICHLOROPHENOL
2t 4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
PEHTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENOL
NAPHTHALENE
BIS(2-ETHYLIIEXYL » PHTHALATE
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTVL PHTHALATE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
I,2-BENZANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE
ANTHRACENE
FLUORENE
PHENANHIfttNE
PYKENE
CHI OKhANE
Al CHA-6IIC
CAMHA-DHC
ANTIMONV
INFLUENT
108374
139444
373712
23813
30.3
249257
112609
103249
33189
790S3
S215
84213
4.8
I O.I
32.4
.9
N-D
.9
N-D
4.3
24.0
L 0.1
4.S
17.4
11.7
L 0.1
1.0
.2
.7
10. S
.9
34.4
1 .8
1.9
19. 8
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-0
H-0
I 0,1
L O.I
NO
TOTAL OUT
84984
300539
230814
22928
7.4
291139
-
103443
-
177384
3597
21342
L 0.1
N-0
S.I
L 0.1
.3
, i
.3
1 .0
7.0
L O.I
2.2
.4
2.0
L 0.1
.3
N-D
N-0
1 .1
.4
44.0
1 .4
1 .3
2.3
.4
.2
.2
1 .3
.2
1 .1
, 1
L O.I
L O.I
L O.I
. 5
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
19207
1IOSS
42740
8491
4.3
143374
124428
21901
29723
7822
3474
18484
N-0
N-D
4.9
N-D
N-0
L 0.1
N-0
N-0
4.9
N-D
2.2
N-D
1 .7
N-0
.3
N-0
N-D
I O.I
N-D
24.8
N-0
.8
I.I
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-U
L 0.1
I O.I
L O.I
N-D
PRIMARY
SLUDGE
29438
213298
113310
10412
1.0
98449
NOT RUN
31834
NOT RUN
115104
78.3
1003
I O.I
N-0
.2
L 0. 1
.3
L O.I
.3
1 .0
L O.I
L 0.1
N-D
.5
,3
L 0.1
.2
N-D
N-D
. 1
.4
4.9
1 .4
.4
. 1
N-D
.2
.2
1 .3
.2
1 .3
. 1
N-D
N-D
N-D
.3
SECONDARY
SLUDGE
34341
74184
74344
3423
.3
44894
NOT RUN
31910
NOT RUN
34440
43.2
1431
L 0,1
N-0
N-D
L 0.1
L 0.1
N-0
L 0. I
L O.I
L 0.1
N-D
N-0
.1
t 0.1
N-0
N-0
N-0
N-D
.9
N-0
34.3
.2
.3
1.3
.4
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
.2
HIIIUIANTB NOT LISTED UEKE NOT DETECTED
I ItSS III AH I N-D NOT DETECTED!
rhll IMINAKY DATA ONLY TO BE VEMFILi'
-------
FRACTION
NETALS
NABS BALANCE IN LDS. PER DAY
PLANT IB
NON-CONV. METALS
PARAMETER
ARSENIC
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
ZINC
ALUMINUM
BARIUM
CALCIUM
IRON
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
60DIUN
INFLUENT
N-D
1.2
24.7
61. t
88.0
70,7
.3
12.4
N-D
7.6
172
2560
5B.O
8343
2140
1912
84.3
23205
TOTAL OUT
.4
1.0
12.1
34.4
110
63.9
.3
10.4
.1
S.O
13*
_
-
-
-
-
-
-
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
N-D
N-D
3.4
3.3
58.9
12.1
.1
7.3
N-D
1.3
38.8
218
8.8
4844
191
1391
48.4
25438
PRIMARY
SLUDOE
,4
.4
4.1
17.2
29.4
29.7
.2
1.4
.1
1.3
37.7
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
SECONDARY
SLUDGE
.2
.4
2.4
13.9
22.2
22.1
L 0.1
1.3
N-D
2.4
S9.3
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
8
O
CTl
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED MERE NOT DETECTED
L-LEBS THANI N-D NOT DETECTED)
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY TO BE VERIFIED
-------
PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF POLLUTANT PARAMETERS
PLANT 18
to
to
FARAHETER
1,1,1 TRICUIOKOETHANE
HEIHYLENE CHLORIDE
TE1RACHLOROETHYLENE
IOLUENE
IKILItl OkOEIHYLEME
CHROHIIIH
COPPER
CVANIbE
I EAb
HERCUKY
NICKEL
ZINC
BENZENE
CHLOKOFORH
ETHYLBENZENE
PHENOL
BI8(2-ETHYLHEXYL> PIIIHALAIE
BUHL BEN2YL PHTMALATE
SILVER
GAMMA bllC
CAbMlUH
If1-DICHLOROETHANE
NAPHIIIALENE
bl-N bUTYL PHIHALATE
til-N OCIYL PHIHALATE
1 .2-blCHLOROETHANE
IR1 CHIOROFLU080HE THANE
2 CHI OfcOPHENOL
2.4 -bICHLOfcOPHENOL
2>4-bIHETHYLPH£NOL
PtHIACIIC QHOPHEHOL
A1PIIA bllC
1iI.2.2 lETRACHLOROEIHAHE
1.2-TRAN8-DICHLOROETHYLENE
blEIHYL PHTIIALATE
1,2 llLH/ANIIIRACENE
CHRY8ENE
ANMIRACENE
U (/UhtHE
PHENANTHRENE
PYRENE
CHLOKbANE
AN1 IHIINY
AKSENIC
bll ENIUH
INFL-
UENT
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
63
83
63
83
63
63
63
67
SO
33
33
33
33
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
( 4>
( 4t
< 4>
< 4)
I 4>
( 4)
< A)
( A>
( A>
< 4>
< A)
< 4)
( 4>
( 4>
< 4)
I A>
< 4)
< 4>
( 4>
( 4>
( 4»
< 4>
< 6)
< 4>
( 6)
( 4>
< A)
( A)
( 4)
( A)
( At
< 4»
( A)
< 4)
< 4»
( 6)
( 4>
< 6)
( 4>
( A)
( 6)
( A)
( A)
( A)
( A)
SECONbAKY
EFFL.
100
63
too
0
too
too
63
100
47
S3
83
too
0
17
0
17
63
0
47
too
0
0
0
47
17
o
Q
Q
17
0
o
33
o
Q
o
o
Q
o
Q
0
o
t 7
Q
Q
Q
4)
4)
4>
4)
4>
4>
4)
4>
4>
i»
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4>
4>
4)
4)
4>
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4>
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
PRIH.
SLDO
100 < 4)
100 < 4)
0
100
too
100
100
100
too
100
100
too
100
47
63
63
100
63
too
0
too
33
100
100
17
0
100
33
100
o
o
4)
83
too
0
too
100
too
47
100
too
0
too
100
47
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
SEC.
SI DO
0 <
83 (
0 <
100 (
40 <
too <
100 <
100 (
too <
17 (
too (
too <
33 <
0 (
33 (
too <
too <
33 (
too (
0 <
too <
SO (
0 <
47 <
33 (
0 (
0 <
0 <
0 <
0 <
0 <
0 <
83 <
30 (
17 (
0 I
0 (
0 (
0 (
0 (
0 (
0 (
too <
too <
0 (
4)
4)
4)
4)
S>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4>
4)
4)
TAP
UATER
0 ( 1)
100 < 1)
100
0
0
0
100
Q
Q
0
Q
100
0
too
0
0
|00
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 )
1 )
1)
1)
1)
)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1 )
1 )
t)
1 )
1)
1)
1)
1)
1 )
1)
1)
1>
1)
I)
1 )
1 )
1 )
1 >
1>
>
1
1 )
1 )
I II! I MIAMI S Hill tltilLb UEKE HUI 1'MLCIEb AT ANY brtHI-l E FOINI
LJIVl OHI IKHLU ttbllCll/ES UEKL AL,MII1t|j NO! I'tltt.llu
NlinbEMi IN t AKLNTHEUEb AKE THE NimbtK lit SAIUIES IAMN
IKM1HINARY bATA UNI r 10 lit VIKIMtl'
-------
SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL DATA
PLAN! 19
.FRACTION
CONV.
"NON-CONV.
PARAMETER
0>
BUD
TOTAL SUSP. SOL I OS
CUD
OIL C GREASE
TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS
TOTAL DISS. SOLIDS
SETTLEABLE SOLIDS
TOTAL VOLATILt SOLIDS
VOLATILE 01SS. SOLIUS
TOTAL VOL. SUS. SOLIDS
AMMONIA NITROGEN
TOC
VOLAT1LES BENZENE
CHLQRCOENIENE
1,2-DlCHLORUETHANE
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
I,1,2,2-TETSACHLJRUtlHANE
CHLOROFORM
1,2-TRANS-DICHLORUETHYLENE
1,2-D1CHLOROPROPANE
ETHYLBENZENE
HETHYLENE CHLORIDE
METHYL CHLORIDE
METHYL BRUHlOt
TRICHLOKOFLUOhOMETHAWE
OICHLURODIFLUOROMETIIANt
TETKACHLORUETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLORUETHYLENE
VINYL CHLORIDE
ACIDS. 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2-CHLOROPHENOL
2i4-DICHLOROPHENOL
2,4-OIMETHYLPHENOL
PENTACIILUROPHENOL
PHENOL
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED MERE NEVER OEUCUO
L-LESS THANI N-D NOT DETECTED;
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY TO BE VEKIFIEL
UNITS INFLUENT
MG/L
HG/L
MC/L
MG/L
UG/L
HG/L
HG/L
ML/L
HG/L
HG/L
MG/L
MG/L
HG/L
UG/L
UG/l
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
379
IB7
7t 3
• 112
258
1061
745
t
3tO
9'..
134
34
211
4
3
1
49
0
L 1
It
5
2
21
93
32
I 20
0
167
15
60
32
IS
L 2
2
L 2
2
I 5
130
L
t
I
L
t
L
L
L
L
L
L
SECONDARY PCMT
EFFLUENT REH.
37
22
141
15
35
762
722
1
12B
109
13
19
17
1
I
1
30
0
1
16
I
I
4
66
340
36
1
20
18
3
18
20
2
1
1
1
5
0
90
88
DO
87
86
28
3
UB
66
90
44
68
75
6T
39
11
80
50
81
27
88
95
44
50
50
100
PRIMARY
EFFLUENT
325
132
698
37
271
1007
671
1
336
79
77
20
187
3
2
1
31
1
0
14
2
1
20
66
574
110
0
130
22
61
25
72
0
3
0
1
I 5
57
L
L
L
L
I
L
L
I
L
I
I
PRE CL PRIMARY
EFFLUENT SLUDGE
45
29
146
16
48
756
674
I
120
82
21
25
73
1
4
3
61
375
42
|
20
18
2
17
20
2
1
1
3
5
0
1-9693
79583
9-4400
7920
684
58303
NOI RUN
1000
40131
NOT RUN
47550
97
981
15
N-0
N-D
115
10
657
29
7
N-D
336
32
N-D
N-0
M-D
N-0
H-0
980
376
N-0
5
28
12
N-0
20
501
SECONDARY
SLUDGE
8989
22500
21734
512
205
18044
NOT
984
RUN
13354
NOT
RUN
13667
52
675
2
N-D
N-D
67
19
1
19
341
N-D
14
29
N-0
N-D
N-D
N-0
N-D
32
28
N^D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-0
M-0
118
-------
SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL DATA
PLANT
Co ^
A
tkAUIUH PARAMLIEK
bASE-NEUT. 1,2,4-rRlCMLORUbENJENE
1,2-OICMLOROBLNZENE
1 .3-01CHLOKOJEMENE
I .S-OICHLOROatNZENE
FLUURANIIIENE
NAPHItULtNE
B1SI2-ETHYLH£XYL) PHTHALAlf
bUKL BEU2YL PHTHALAIE
UI-N-BUTYL PillMALAIt
DI-N-OCIYL PHIHALATE
DIEIIIYL PIITHALATE
ANTHRACINt
PHENANTHRENt
PYHENE
PESTICIDES 4,4'-UOE
4,'i<-L)l)0
HEPIACHLUR
CAHHA-bHC
MLIALS ANIIHUNY
AKSLNIC
CAOHIUH
CIIKOHIUH
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
MEKCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
I INC
N-C MEIALS ALUMINUM
bARIUM
CALCIUM
IRON
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
iUIIIUM
UN 11 i
UC/L
UG/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
NC/L
NG/L
NC/L
NC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
NC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
MC/L
UC/L
MC/L
UC/L
MC/L
II.HUtM
L
I
L
I
I
L
t
L
I
I
L
5
7
5
2
4
3
Jj
19
I
S
3
5
S
*
200
Ub
35
105
SO
50
9
107
9b
714
47
too
54
50
1C
224
3i54
120
2b
2035
16
10
150
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
SCCUN'DAhV PCNT
EFFLULIH REM.
5
5
5
2
4
3
20
3
4
5
b
S
5
4
200
300
100
57
50
50
2
2t
16
337
50
03
44
50
5
38
337
16
25
643
16
111
152
29
39
64
46
70
76
64
53
66
19
50
63
91
65
11
59
22
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
I
I
L
L
L
PRIMARY
tFFLUENT
5
6
5
1
4
4
36
12
4
2
3
5
5
4
200
300
100
120
50
50
6
63
64
509
10
6t»3
58
50
10
249
298tt
IOJ
27
2257
16
125
148
L
L
L
L
L
I
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
I
L
PRE CL PRIMARY
EFFLUENT SLUOCL
5
3
5
1
4
3
20
3
4
5
5
5
5
4
200
300
100
26
50
50
2
23
15
247
50
100
45
25
5
43
325
18
25
656
16
109
149
479
911
300
519
114
471
5038
3428
377
19
N-U
229
229
32
H-0
N-0
N-0
N-0
150
265
917
5350
12363
166000
12363
219000
2042
147
650
26363
NOT KUN
NOT RUN
NOT KUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NO! RUN
NOT f>UN
SECONDARY
SLUDGE
64
112
41
70
32
2
1914
N-0
21
6
N-0
N-0
N-0
11
,1667
N-0
N-D
N-0
82
131
2727
1343
2917
33917
5100
79167
346
17
410
16963
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
fllllUUNli NUI L1STLO UE.U NtVth UClLCIU)
I-IESS THAN! N-D NUI DtTECItUi
PKLLIMINAKY JAli UNLY II) Ut VEMMLL
-------
MASS BALANCE IN LBB. PER PAY
PLANT 19
FRACTION
CONVENTIONALS
NON-CONVENTIONALS
VOLATILE*
PARAMETER
BOD
TOTAL SUSP. SOLIDS
COD
OIL t GREASE
TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS
TOTAL DISS. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDS
VOLATILE DISS. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOL. BUS. SOLIDS
AMMONIA NITROGEN
TOC
BENZENE
CHLOROBENZENE
1>2-DICHLOROETHANE
1>1>1-TRICHLOROETHANE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
1.1r2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
CHLOROFORM
I>2-TRANS-DICHLOROETHVLENE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYLBENZENE
HETHYLENE CHLORIDE
METHYL CHLORIDE
HETHYL BROMIDE
TRICHLOROFLUOROHETHANE
DICHLORODIFLUOROHETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
VINYL CHLORIDE
2r4r6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2-CHLOROPHENOL
2r4-DICHLOROPH£NOL
2r4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
PEHTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENOL
lr2r4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
lr2-DICHLOROBENZENE
lr3-DICHLOROBENZENE
lr4-DICHLOROBENZENE
FLUORANTHENE
NAPHTHALENE
BIB<2-ETHYLHEXYL> PHTHALATE
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED
L-LE59 THANI N-D NOT DETECTEDI
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY TO BE VERIFIED
ACID EXTRACT
BASE-NEUTRALS
INFLUENT
21404?
10S330
408143
43394
H4
597225
420348
214614
53842
75848
19202
I1BB83
2.1
1.7
.7
27.5
.2
H-»
10.4
2.9
.8
12.0
52. 4
is.i
N-D
.2
74.1
8.6
34.0
17.9
10.9
N-D
1.2
N-D
1.0
N-D
73,4
N-D
4.0
N-D
1.3
N-D
1.4
IB. 4
10.5
.7
N-D
1.7
TOTAL OUT
138702
383547
48228S
32374
22.8
714432
-
274824
-
230811
11273
45452
L 0.1
N-D
.8
17.8
.2
1.6
9.4
2.4
.4
3.3
38.9
192
21.4
N-D
N-D
10.4
4.1
11.2
N-D
L 0.1
L 0.1
.6
,4
L 0.1
2.3
1.7
5.7
1.0
2,6
.5
1.2
38.3
8.4
I.I
L 0.1
N-D
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
20803
12237
7V82I
8440
19,5
430452
407841
72197
61540
7248
10637
38028
N-D
N-D
.8
17.0
I 0.1
N-D
9.2
N-D
.4
2.4
38.4
192
21.4
N-D
N-D
10.4
I.S
10.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
.6
.4
N-D
L 0.1
N-D
2.5
N-D
.0
N-D
N-D
11.0
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
PRIMARY
SLUDGE
49212
198879
235904
19792
1 .7
145698
NOT RUN
100287
NOT RUN
118827
241
2451
I 0.1
N-D
N-D
.3
t 0.1
1.6
L 0.1
L 0.1
N-D
.8
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
2.4
.9
N-D
L 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
N-D
I 0.1
1.3
1.2
2.3
.7
1.3
.3
1.2
12.6
8.6
.9
L 0.1
N-D
SECONDARY
SLUDOE
68887
172431
144558
3924
1.6
138282
NOT RUN
102340
NOT RUN
104734
395
5173
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
.5
.1
L 0.1
.1
2.6
N-D
.1
.2
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
.2
.2
N-D
H-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
.9
.5
.9
.3
.5
.2
L 0.1
14.7
N-D
.2
L 0.1
N-D
-------
MASS BALANCE IN L6S. PER DAT
PLANT 19
m AC u UN
BASE-NEUTRALS
PESTICIOEfi
METALS
NOM-CONU. METALS
A £
PARAMETER
ANTHRACENE
PHENANTHREME
PYRENE
1.4'-DDE
4.4'-DDD
HEPTACHLOR
OAMHA-BHC
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
ZINC
ALUMINUM
BARIUM
CALCIUM
IRON
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
SODIUM
INFLUENT
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-B
L O.I
L O.|
L O.t
N-D
N-D
4.9
40.3
SS.I
403
24.5
.3
30.4
N-0
5. 6
124
200?
67.7
15429
114V
9131
80.9
84904
TOTAL OUT
.4
.4
.2
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
L O.|
1.0
1.7
23.2
38.4
42.1
920
70.0
1. 1
32.6
.3
3.2
217
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
M-D
L O.I
N-0
N-D
N-0
14.7
a. a
190
N-0
L 0.1
23.0
N-D
N-D
21.2
190
9.9
14308
474
9131
42.4
85437
PRIMARY
SLUDGE
.4
.4
I 0.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
.4
.7
2.3
13.4
30.9
470
30.9
.3
3.1
.4
2.1
43.9
NOT RUM
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
SECONDARY
SLUDOE
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
L 0.1
«-D
N-D
«-»
.4
1.0
20.9
10.3
22.4
240
39.1
.4
2.7
,1
I.I
130
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED
I ILS6 MIAN* N-0 NOT DETECTED!
I'M! IMINAKY DATA ONLY TO BE VERIFIED
-------
PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF POLLUTANT PARAMETERS
PLANT 1?
PARAMETER
BENZENE
1.1r1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYLBENZENE
HETHYLENE CHLORIDE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TR1CMLOROETHYLENE
PHENOL
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
MERCURY
NICKEL
ZINC
CHLOROBENZENE
1,2-TRANB-DICHLOROETHYLENE
If 2-DICIILOROPROPANE
B1S<2-ETHYLHEXYL> PHTHALATE
CAOHIUH
SILVER
2-CHLOROPHENOL
NAPHTHALENE
OAMHA-BHC
LEAD
2.4-DIHETHYLPHEHOL
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
1•2-D1CHLOROETHANE
1,1-PICHLOROETHANE
METHYL CHLORIDE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1.2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1r 4-DICHLOROBENZENE
TRICHLOROFLUOROHETHANE
DICHLORODIFLUOROHETHANE
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
4r4'-DDD
HEPTACHLOR
1r1r2*2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
METHYL BROMIDE
2>4>6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2.4-DICHLOROPHENOL
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
1>3-DICHLOROBENZENE
FLUORANTHENE
'DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
ANTHRACENE
PIIENANTHREHE
PYRENE
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED HERE NOT DETECTED
UNCONFIRMED PESTICIDES HERE ASSUMED NOT
NUMBERS IN PARENTHESES ARE THE NUMBER OF
PRELIMINARY DATA OHLY-TO BE VERIFIED
INFL- PRIM. PRE CL. SEC. PRIM. SEC. Trtf
UENT EFFL. EFFL EFFL. SLUG SLOG WATER
100
100
too
100 '
100
100
ioo
100
100
too
100
loo
100
100
too
too
63
83
B3
B3
03
83
67
47
47
67
SO
50
33
33
33
33
33
33
17
17
17
17
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6> 100
4) 100
«) 100
6) 100
6) 100
4) 100
6) 100
6) 100
6) 100
4) S3
4) 100
4) 100
6> 100
4) 100
41 100
4) 100
6) 03
6) 03
4) SO
4> 03
4> 100
6) 100
6) 03
4) 03
At 67
4) 17
6) 50
4) 30
6) 33
4) 33
4) iOO
4) 33
6) SO
6) 17
6) 17
6) 17
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
6) 17
6> 17
6) 17
6) 17
6) 0
6) 0
6) 0
6) 0
6> 17
6) 0
4> 0
0 < 6) 0
4) 0
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
4> 100
4) 100
4) 100
6) 03
6) 17
6) 0
4) 03
6) 100
6) 100
6) 33
4> 100
6) 83
4) 0
4) 0
4) 83
4> 100
6) 0
4> 0
6) 0
6) 0
6) 33
4) 0
6> 67
6) 0
6) 33
6) 33
6> 100
4) 0
4) 33
6) 17
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
6) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 33
4) 0
4) 33
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
6) 0
6) 0
4> 100
4) 100
6) 63
4) 100
4) 100
4) 03
6) 100
4) 17
4> 0
4) IOO
6) 100
6 ) IOO
6) 33
6> 100
4) 03
4) 0
4) 0
4) 67
6) 100
6) 0
6) 0
6) 0
6) 0
6) SO
6) 0
4) 17
6) 0
6) 33
6) 17
6) 03
4) 0
6) SO
6) 17
6) 0
6) 0
6) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 33
4) 0
6) 33
6) 0
6) 0
6) 0
4> 0
6) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
4) 47
6) 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
4> 0
4) 100
4) 100
6) 100
4) 100
6) IOO
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
4> 100
6) tOO
6) 0
6) 17
4) 0
6) 100
4) 100
4) 100
6) 03
6> IOO
6> 0
4) 100
6) 0
6) 0
6) 0
6) 33
6) 0
6) 0
4) 100
6) 100
4) 0
6) 0
6) 100
6) 0
4) 0
6) 100
4) 0
6) 33
4) 50
4) 33
4) IOO
4) 100
4) 100
4> 17
4) 100
4) 47
4) 100
4> 100
4) 03
4) 100
4) 0
4) 100
4) 47
4) 03
4) 0
4) 100
4) 100
6> 100
6) IOO
4) IOO
4) 100
4) 0
4) 100
4) 0
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) 0
4> 17
6) 0
6) 100
6) 0
6) 0
6) 0
4) 100
4) 0
4) 0
4) 100
4) 100
4) 0
4) 0
4) 33
4) 0
4) 0
4) 33
4) 0
4) 0
6) 0
4) 0
6) 03
4) 67
6) 100
6) 17
4) 0
4) 100 < 4) 0
4) IOO ( 6) 47
4> 0 < 1)
4) 0(1)
4) 100 ( M
4) 0(1)
4) IOO ( 1)
6) 0 < l>
4) 0
4) 0
6) 0
4) 0
4) O
6> 100
4) 100
6) 0
4) 0
4) IOO
6) 0
4> 0
4) 0
6) 0
6> 0
4) 0
4) 0
6) 0
1)
1 >
1)
l>
1 >
1>
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1>
1 )
4) 0 < 1)
6) 0(1)
6) 0 < 1)
6) 0
6) 0
4) 0
6) 0
6) 0
4) 0
6) 0
6) 0
6) 0
6) 0
6) 0
6) 0
6) 0
6) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
1)
1)
l>
1>
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1>
1)
1)
1)
1)
1>
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
4) 0(1)
6> 0 ( 1)
CTED AT ANY SAMPLE POINT
NOT DETECTED
ER OF SAMPLES TAKI l|
-------
PERCENT OCCUKkENCE OF POLLUTANT PARAMETERS
PLANT 1»
fAKAMCILK
4.<'-DDE
AHTIHONV
AHSENIC
SELENIUH
INFL-
UENT
0
0
0
0
( 4)
( 4)
( 4)
PRIH.
EFFL.
0
0
0
0
( 4)
( 4)
< 6)
PRE CL.
EFFL
0
0
0
17
( 4)
< 4)
SEC.
EFFL.
0 I
0 I
0
0
( 6)
( 4)
PRIH.
SLDG
0
100
100
63
*>
SEC.
SLI'G
17 <
100 <
100 (
17 <
TAP
UATElt
0
0
0
0
( 1)
( 1)
MIIIIIIAHIS HOI LISItU ULKt NUT Iitlttltd AT ANr 6AHHLE POINl
Ml/I ONI H.HLLP PISIICIOtS UtKL ASSUMEb HU [ IiEltCltii
HllMbihS IN PARENTHESES ARE THE NUMbEfc OF SAMPLES
tktllHIHAKr DATA UNIV-IO bt I'tKIKItti
-------
SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL DATA
PLANT 20
.FRACTION
CONV.
NON-CONV.
PARAMETER
VOLATILES
•vl
ro
00
A
AC1U5.
BOD
TOTAL SUSP. SOLIDS
COO '
OIL C CREASE
TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS
TOTAL OISS. SOLIDS
SETTLEABLE SOLIDS
TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIUS
VOLATILE OISS. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOL. SUS. SOLIDS
AMMONIA N1TROCEN
TOC
BENZENE
CARBON TtTRACHLURIDE
l.ltl-TRICHLOROETHANE
1,1-OICHLOROETHANE
CHLOROFORM
1,2-TRANS-OICHLUROETHYLENE
EIHYLBENZENE
HETHYLENE CHLORIDE
METHYL CHLORIDE
METHYL BROMIDE
BROMOFORM
DICHLOROBRUMOMETHANE
DICHLOROUIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLORODIBROMOMETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
VINYL CHLORIDE
2»4»6-TRKHLOROPHENUL
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
PHENOL
BASE-NEUT. I,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DlCHLORUBEN/ENE
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED HERE NEVER DETECTED
L-LESS THAN! N-0 NOT DETECTED!
PRELIMINARY DATA UMLY---TO OE VERIFIED
UNITS
HG/L
HG/L
MG/L
MG/L
UG/L
HG/L
HG/L
HL/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
HC/L
MG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L I
UG/L I
UG/L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L L
INFLUENT
2*7
421
750
32
85
Ilb3
798
21
415
eo
256
Ib
90
2
1
32
3
5
2
5
51
5
37
1
1
40
0
15
23
31
13
1
0
0
9
It
5
I
I
I
L
L
I
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
SECONDARY
EFFLUtMT
21
13
41
12
50
757
741
1
100
92
7
13
16
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
14
25
20
1
1
19
1
1
1
0
20
1
0
1
0
5
5
PCNT
REM.
91
97
95
63
41
36
7
96
76
97
2»
84
50
97
67
60
50
80
73
46
52
93
96
100
100
6*
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
I
I
I
I
L
L
L
TERI1ARY
EFFLUENT'
8
5
40
e
21
612
794
1
119
101
2
1
14
1
1
1
1
24
1
1
2
25
20
2
19
17
14
1
1
1
20
1
1
1
1
5
5
PRIMARY
SLUDGE
15833
67833
41067
5337
194
58947
NOT RUN
998
35750
NUT RUN
43750
70
1304
II
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-0
507
61
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-0
N-D
N-0
197
309
N-0
N-D
N-D
N-D
53
3oa
88
SECONDARY
SLUDGE
7543
16986
9613
1623
127
B827
NUT RUN
983
(Oil
NO I RUN
10208
27
583
K-0
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-0
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-0
N-0
N-0
N-0
N-0
53
N-D
N-0
N-D
N-0
N-0
60
7
N-0
NIIRIMCA1IUM
SLUDGE
8350
25084
9960
270
118
8499
NOT RUN
870
6089
NOT RUN
16167
a
335
N-D
N-0
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
H-0
N-0
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-0
N-0
N-D
N-D
125
N-0
N-0
N-D
N-0
N-D
23
N-D
N-0
-------
SUMMARY Of ANALYTICAL OAIA
PLANI 20
IKiCIlUN PAKAHtlbK
ftASE-NtUI. FLUORANIHENE
____ . _ _ ISOPIIORONE
NAPHIHALLNE
blSIJ-EItlYLIIEXYL ) PlIIHJLAlt
BUHL BfN/YL PHIMALAU
OI-N-BUTYL PHTHALAIE
OIETHYL PIUIIALATE
1.2-bENlANIHRACENE
I 1,12-bENZQFLUORANIHENt
CHRY1.ENL
ACENAPHTHYLENE
ANTHRACENE
1.12-bENiOPERYLENE
FLUORENE
PHENANTHRENE
PYRENE
PESTICIDES 4.4--UUO
HEPTACHLUR tPOXlOE
ALPHA -BMC
CAHHA-UhC
htlM-S ANTIHUNY
ARSENIC
CADMIUM
CHRQHIUH
CUPPER
CYANIDE
LtAU
NEHCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUH
SILVER
l(Ht
N-L HEIALS ALUMINUM
OARIUH
CALCIUM
I RUN
HACMLSIUH
UNITS
UC/L
UC/L
UG/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
NC/L
NC/L
NC/L
NC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UG/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
NC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
HC/L
UC/L
MC/L
UC/L
1M-LUCNI
I
I
I
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
I
t
I
4
6
3
24
b
3
3
5
5
5
10
5
25
5
5
4
52
38
50
113
50
9
2
39
its
f,}
26
761
63
50
7
370
27*0
125
40
2925
2i>
61
L
L
L
L
L
I
L
L
L
L
I
L
I
L
L
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
L
I
I
SECONUAkY PCNT
EFFLUENT REH.
4
10
3
6
3
*
S
5
5
5
10
5
2i
15
5
4
3CO
100
50
72
50
50
2
1
9
i7
bO
200
21
50
5
36
91
44
43
96
24
60
75
63
56
97
95
64
74
67
29
90
97
65
10
97
a
26
L
L
L
L
L
I
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
I
I
L
I
I
L
L
TERTIARY PRIMARY
EFFLUENT SLUOCE
4
10
3
9
3
4
5
5
5
5
10
5
25
5
5
4
600
200
22
125
50
50
2
5
10
1565
5o
200
14
50
5
3d
31
39
43
19
2*
4
10
N-0
H-0
2357
U27
200
12
N-0
N-0
N-0
N-0
37
N-0
N-0
37
10
N-0
N-0
N-0
N-0
186
258
86
3433
14433
30050
6467
127b52
3200
134 L
773
27617
NUT RUN
NOT kUN
NOT RUN
NO! RUN
NOT RUN
ttU I KUN
SECONDARY NITRIFICATION
SLUOCE SLUDCt
N-0
N-0
N-0
671
N-0
N-0
8
N-0
N-0
N-0
N-0
3
N-0
N-0
3
N-0
N-0
N-0
N-0
h-0
10
76
46
V98
3500
2917
1420
24167
632
100
247
8750
KOI RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
365
N-0
170
425
N-0
N-0
54
70
20
70
305
700
65
250
700
310
N-C
N-0
N-0
N-0
L 50
115
16
1010
2450
1650
1600
19500
775
I 100
165
5950
NUT
NOT
NOT
NOT
NUT
NUI
RUN
RUN
RUN
RUN
RUN
RUN
PULLUIAHIS NUI LISILO MlKt NLVtK JtllCILU
l-IESS IHANI N-D NOT OLTECTEUi
r«lllHlNAKY (JAIA QNLY --- 10 UE VERlFILb
-------
SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL DATA
PLANT iO
SECONDARY PCNT TERTIARY PRIMARY SECONDARY NMRIFICATIIIN
FRACTION PAKAMETEK UNITS INFLUENT EFFLUtM KEM. EFFLUENT SLUDGE SLUDGE SLUDGE
N-C HETALS SODIUM HG/L 13,! U5 139 NOT RUN NOT RUN NOT RUN
Co
o
POLLUTANTS NUT LISTED HERE NEVER DETECTED
L-LESS THAN» N-0 NUT DETECTEDI
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY- — TO BE VERIFIED
-------
MASS BALANCE IN LSS. PER DAT
PLANT 20
tHACTION
CONVENTIOMAL8
NUN-CONVENTIONAL 8
VOLATILE8
ui
ACID tXIKACI
UASE-NLUIKALB
I Llil ICll'tS
PARAMETER
BOD
TOTAL SUSP. SOLIDS
COD
OIL 1 GREASE
TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS
10TAL DISS. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDS
VOLATILE DISS. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOL. SUS. SOLIDS
AMMONIA NITROGEN
TOC
BENZENE
CARBON TETKACHLORIbE
1 i 1 . 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
1.1-OICHLOROETHANE
CHLOROFORM
1. 2-TfcANS-DICHLOftOETHYLENE
ETHYLBENZENE
NETIIYLENE CHLORIDE
HEIMYL CHLORIDE
METHYL BROMIDE
DICHLOROBROMOMETHANE
DICHLOROblFLUOROHETHANE
CHLORODIBROMOMETHAME
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOK'OETHYLENE
VINYL CHLORIDE
2i4»6-TftlCHLOROPHENOL
2.4-D1CHLOROPHENOL
2.4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
PHENOL
i.2.4-IKICMLUkObtNZEME
I.2-OICULOKOHEN2ENE
FLUORANIHENE
ISOPHORONE
DIS(2-EIIIYI lltXYL > PHIHALATE
bUIH btNZVL PHTIIAIAIE
DI N Kimi tit THAI AIE
Ditrim tiiiiKHAit
AHIIIfiACt-Ht
PHtHAHl MHEHt
PYKtNt
4.4' -Pl'b
HLPIACm lift tt 0X1 Lit.
OAHMA-bllC
INFLUENT
245441
417680
745327
31435
84. 3
1173960
792862
411917
87286
234219
18033
96892
2.0
1.3
31.6
3.0
4.6
2.0
4.8
30.7
4.6
36.8
N-0
39.9
.2
13.2
22.9
30.3
13.3
.7
.2
,2
8.9
13.?
N-0
N-b
3.8
23.9
8. 1
2. 7
2. 7
N-0
NO
N-l)
I 0.1
I 0,1
.2
TOTAL OUT
229951
625427
402375
69218
\
52.9
1175027
-
367708
-
388033
13234
3IBB4
L 0.1
N-0
. 7
N-0
2.2
2.2
.3
13.7
N-0
N-II
1.2
19.2
.7
1.2
1.9
J.7
N-D
.3
.2
N-D
1 .3
1 .3
.4
L O.I
N-0
28.4
3.4
.9
. 3
1
. 2
L O.I
H b
N b
I O.I
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
21200
13230
40413
12091
49.7
752283
736217
9921 1
91392
6936
12422
13403
N-D
N-0
.7
N-D
2.2
N-D
N-D
13.7
N-D
N-0
1 .2
19.2
.7
1.2
N-D
.3
N-0
.3
.2
H-D
.2
N-D
N-0
N-D
N-D
3.6
N-0
N D
N-D
N-0
N-0
N-0
N-b
N-b
L O.I
PRIMARY
SLUOOE
69899
299477
181303
23561
.9
260243
NOT RUN
137833
NOT RUN
193152
309
3736
t O.I
N-0
N-D
N-D
N-D
2.2
.3
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
.9
1 .4
N-D
N-D
H-D
N-0
.2
1 .4
.4
L O.I
N-D
10.4
3.6
.9
L O.I
.2
.2
L 0.1
N-0
N-l)
N-D
SECONDARY
8LUDOE
138832
312700
180637
33566
2.3
162499
NOT RUN
110664
NOT RUN
187925
303
10723
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
1.0
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
1.1
.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
12.4
N-D
N-D
.2
L O.I
L 0.1
N-b
N-U
N-D
N-D
MHIUIANIb NUI L IS I til UtNt NO I 1'CUCIED
I I I l,b 1HANI N D NUI I'lltLltlJI
CKIIIMINAkY DATA ONI Y 10 fc£ VEKUU'D
-------
FRACTION
METALS
MASS BALANCE IN LBB. PER DAY
PLANT 20
HOH-COMW. HETALS
PARAMETER
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
ZINC
ALUMINUM
BARIUM
CALCIUN
IRON
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
SODIUM
INFLUENT
N-D
7.3
N-0
38. 4
184
241
26,2
,0
62. i
N-D
7.0
349
272J
124
47370
2707
25472
80.3
130844
TOTAL OUT
1 .0
2.5
1.2
34,9
137
308
54,4
1.0
49.9
.4
7.9
319
^
-
-
-
-
-
-
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
N-D
N-D
N-D
1.3
9.3
84.3
N-D
N-D
20.5
N-D
N-0
33. A
70.4
43.4
42235
77.2
23517
40.0
134324
PRIMARY
SLUDGE
.8
1 .1
,4
15.2
43.7
148
28.3
.4
14.1
.6
3.4
122
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
SECONDARY
SLUDGE
.2
1.4
.8
IB. 4
44.4
53.7
24.1
,4
15.3
N-D
4.5
141
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
en
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED
L-LESS THAN* N-D NOT DETECTED*
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY TO BE VERIFIED
-------
HASS BALANCE IN IBS. PER OAT
TERIARY TREATMENT SYSTEM
PLANT 20
FHACIION
CONVENIIONALB
NQN-CONVENT10NAL8
VOLAIILE8
ACID EXTRACT
DASE-NEUIRALB
ft til 1C I DEB
ML IAI b
PARAMETER
BOD
TOTAL 6USP. SOLIDS
COD
OIL | GREASE
TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS
TOTAL DISS. SOLIDS
TOIAL VOLATILE SOLIDS
VOLATILE DISS. SOLIDS
TOIAL VOL. SUS. SOLIDS
AHHONIA NITROGEN
TOC
I • I . I-TRICHLOROETHANE
CHLOROFORM
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
BROHOFORH
DICHLOROBROHOHETHANE
DICHLORODIFLUORONE THANE
CHLORODIBROHOHETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHVLENE
TOLUENE
IRICHLOROETHYLENE
2 . 4 • 4 - TR I CHLOROPHENOL
2.4-DICHLOROPHENOL
PHENOL
FLUORANTHENE
NAPHTHALENE
BIB(2-ETHYLHEXYL> PHTHALATE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
I.2-0ENZANTHRACENE
1 I . I 2-BENZOFLUORANTHENE
CHRY6ENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
ANTHRACENE
I. 12-BENZOPERYLENE
FLUORENE
PHENANTHRENE
PYRENE
ALPHA -t>HC
UAHHA-BHC
AKtitNIC
I ADHIUM
Cm f'EK
CYANII'L
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
20383
12739
38855
11425
47.8
723274
707830
95384
86041
4488
11941
HBO*
.4
2.1
13.2
N-D
1.1
18.9
.4
1.1
N-D
.3
.3
.2
.2
N-D
N-D
3.4
N-0
N-D
N-0
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
H-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
L O.I
N-D
N D
1 .1
e.y
£13. 0
TOTAL OUT
2310S
50246
S4471
7820
19 .9
791242
-
12453*
-
31339
493
13513
N-P
22. B
2.2
1 .4
17. 0
14.4
13.3
N-D
.2
N-0
N-D
N-D
I O.I
.7
.3
e. »
I 0. 1
.1
L O.I
.1
.4
1.3
. 1
.3
1 .1
.4
L O.I
. 1
.2
L O.I
1 .»
11,1
MVU
TERTIARY
EFFLUENT
7803
4300
38218
7323
19.7
775447
738310
113380
94440
1911
478
12899
N-D
22.6
2.2
1.4
17. B
14.4
13.9
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-0
N-D
N-D
N-0
N-D
8.1
N-0
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
L O.I
.1
N-D
N-D
N D
9.4
1495
NITRIFICATION
SLUDOE
13302
4S94B
18253
495
.2
1SS7S
NOT RUN
11139
NOT RUN
29428
14.7
414
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-0
N-D
.2
N-D
N-D
N-D
I 0.1
.7
.3
lfl
L oil
.1
L 0. 1
.1
.4
1 .3
.1
.3
I .3
.4
N-D
N-D
.2
I 0.1
1 .9
4 .5
3.0
IIIIIUIANIb N01 IISUli UtKE NO I I'tHlILD
I llSb IHAMJ NO NOT DEItCUKI
IhlllMINARY DATA ONI Y 10 BE VERIFIED
I
-------
MASS BALANCE IN LBS. PER DAY
TERIARY TREATMENT SYSTEM
PLANT 20
FRACTION
METALS
NON-CONV. METALS
PARAMETER
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
SILVER
ZINC
ALUMINUM
BARIUM
CALCIUM
IRON
MAGNESIUM
HANOANEBE
SODIUM
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
TOTAL OUT
TERTIARY
EFFLUENT
NITRIFICATION
SI.UPOE
N-D
N-D
IV. 7
N-D
34,2
2.?
I 0,1
14. e
.3
47.5
N-D
N-D
13.4
N-D
34.4
2.9
L 0.1
1 .4
,3
10.9
84.9
41,7
40407
V3.3
22412
57.6
129143
29. 8
37,1
40925
18.3
23090
3.8
13,2808
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED MERE NOT DETECTED
L-LESS THANI N-D NOT DETECTEDI
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY TO BE VERIFIED
-------
PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF POLLUTANT PARAMETERS
PLANT 20
01
A
<£>
PARAMETER
CHLOROFORM
MtlimENE CIILORIbE
COPPER
CYANIDE
ZINC
H I LIU OROBROMOHE THANE
TETRACHLOROETIIYLENE
NICKEL
CHLORODIHROHOHE THANE
HI6<2 ETIirLHEXYL) PIITHALATE
OAHHA-BIIC
2.4.4-TR1CHLOROPHENOL
1,1. 1-TftICHLOROETHANE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
1MCHLORGETHYLENE
2.4-DICHLOROPHENOL
PHENOL
CHROMIUM
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
ti I-DICHLOROETHAME
1 . 2-IRAM8-DICIUOROETHYLENE
EIHYLbLNZENE
METHYL CHLORIDE
HETIIYL bROHIbE
DROMOFORH
TOI UENE
VINYL CHLORIDE
2t V DIMLTHY! PHENOL
1 ,2.4-TRlCHLORObENZENE
1 . 2 DItHI OKOBENZENE
FLUORANTHENE
1GOFHQRONE
NAPHTHALENE
BUTYL KENZYL PIITHALATE
01 N bUTYL PIITHALATE
UILTHYL PIITHALATE
1.2 l L H I C
FOIIUIANIb NOT LISILli ULKt NO I I'tlLCIELi
IIHLONI IhHLU tESTICIUES WERE ASSUMED NUT
NIIHl.tKb IN PARENTHESES ARC THE NUHUER OF
II.LLIHINARY ('ATA ONLY-10 6E VERIFIED
INFL-
UENT
100
100
too
100
100
83
83
83
67
47
47
SO
33
33
33
17
17
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
tCTED
li NOT
UER OF
( 4)
( 4)
< 4)
( 4)
< 4>
( 4>
( 4)
( 4)
< 4)
( 4)
( 4)
( 6k
( 4)
( 4)
< 6)
< 4)
< 4k
( 4k
< 4)
( 4k
< 4k
< 4k
4 4k
4 4k
< 4k
4 4k
( 4k
( 4k
4 4k
4 4)
4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
4 4)
4 4k
4 4)
4 4)
4 4)
( 4k
4k
4>
4k
4)
4k
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
AT ANY
PRE CL.
INFL.
100 4
100 4
100 4
100 4
100 4
0 4
100 (
100 4
17 4
100 4
tOO 4
47 4
100 4
47 4
100 4
17 4
47 <
100 4
47 4
33 4
63 4
83 4
100 4
17 4
33 4
0 4
100 4
17 4
17 4
47 4
0 4
0 4
33 4
0 4
63 4
SO 4
30 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 1
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 (
17 <
1 / 4
0 I
0 <
1 > (
SAMPLE
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4)
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
41
4k
4k
4k
4)
4k
4)
4)
POINT
TERT.
EFFL.
100
100
100
too
100
100
0
47
63
63
63
0
0
33
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
47
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
0
0
4)
4k
6)
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
1 4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
Sk
4k
4)
6k
4)
4k
4)
4k
4)
4k
4k
4k
6)
6)
4)
6)
6)
PRIM
SLDO
0
0
100
100
100
0
0
100
0
100
0
0
0
0
33
0
33
too
63
O
0
63
too
0
0
0
too
0
0
SO
33
17
0
0
100
100
17
0
0
0
0
33
0
0
33
17
0
0
0
too
100
4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
< 4)
4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
< 4k
4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
4 6k
4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
4 4)
4 4k
4 4k
4 4)
4 4)
4 4k
4 4)
4 4k
( 4)
( 4)
( 4)
( S >
< 6)
SEC.
SLDO
0 4 4k
0 4 6k
100 4 4k
100 < 4k
100 4 4k
0 4 4k
0 < 4k
100 4 4k
0 4 4k
100 4 6k
0 1 4k
0 4 6k
0 4 4k
0 4 4k
0 4 4)
0 4 4k
33 4 4k
100 4 4k
0 4 4k
0 4 4k
0 ( 4k
0 4 4k
0 4 4k
0 4 4k
0 4 6k
0 4 4k
100 4 6k
0 4 6k
0 4 6k
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
t7
0
0
0
0
17
0
0
17
0
0
0
0
20
100
6k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4)
4)
4k
5>
4k
NIT.
SLbO
0
0
100
too
100
0
0
100
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
so
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
so
0
so
0
0
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
0
0
0
0
100
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
( 2k
4 2k
1 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2>
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2)
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2)
4 2k
4 1 )
4 21
DETECTED
SAMPLES TAKEN
-------
PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF POLLUTANT PARAMETERS
PLANT 20
PARAMETER
CADMIUM
LEAD
MERCURY
SELENIUM
SILVER
INFL
UENT
0
0
0
0
0
-
( 4)
< A)
( 6)
( 4)
< 6)
PRE C
INFL.
0
33
100
0
67
L.
( 61
( A)
< A)
( A)
< A)
TERT
EFFL
0
0
0
0
0
t
•
( A)
( A>
( 4)
( 41
( «)
PRIM
SLl'O
100
100
100
100
100
,
( 4)
( A)
( «>
( 3)
< 4>
SEC.
SI. PO
JOO <
100 <
100 <
0 (
100 <
A)
A)
A)
5)
A)
NIT.
SI I'D
100
100
too
0
100
•
< 2)
< 2»
< 2)
< 1)
( 2)
Co 5
en =>
A
i
2
s
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED MERE NOT DETECTED AT ANY SAMPLE POINT
UNCONFIRMED PESTICIDES WERE ASSUMED NOT DETECTED
NUMBERS IN PARENTHESES ARE THE MUMPER OF SAMPLES TAKEN
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY-TO BE VERIFItD
-------
SECTICW n
-------
1.0 METHOD FOR PURGEABLE ORGANICS
1.1 Scope and Application
1.1.1 Scope
This method is used for the determination of purgeable (volatile)
organics. The complete list of compounds is provided in Table 1.1.
The method is complementary to liquid/liquid extraction techniques
for extractable organics.
1.1.2 Application
The method is applicable to the measurement of purgeafala orsanics
in municipal wastewater sludges. It can be used for screening sam-
ples of sludges for purgeable priority organics in surveys of mu-
nicipal wastewater treatment plants. The method uses GC/MS systems
for qualitative and semi-quantitative determination of these com-
pounds .
1.2 Siirmary
Sludge samples are diluted to 0.52 total solids content with organic-free
water. The diluted sample is then purged at room temperature (^ 22°C)
with an inert gas for 12 min. U'ater insoluble compounds boiling below
200°C are transferred from the aqueous phase to the gaseous phase. The
gaseous phase is passed through a sorbent trap where the organic compounds
-------
are concentrated. The contents of the trap are then injected into the
GC/MS by heating and backflushing the trap. As variations in recover}*
efficiencies for the individual purgeable organics can be affected by ;he
sample matrices, extensive quality control is required for accurate mea-
surements. The total analysis time including extraction is less than 1
hr. This method is recommended for use only by analysts experienced in
the analysis of purgeable organics at the trace levels or by experienced
technicians under the close supervision of a qualified analyst.
1.3 Apparatus and Reagents
1.3.1 For Sample Preparation
1.3.1.1 Purse and trap svstej: Assemble the system as depicted
in Jigures 1.1 and 1.2. A commercial version, such as
the Teksar Liquid Sample Concentrator Model LSC-1, or
its equivalent, may also be used. The purging device is
constructed or modified as shown in Figure 1.3. All saa-
ple contacting surfaces must i either glass or Teflon.
Th<=". trap is packed according to Figure 1.4. In order to
function properly, the trap uiust be packed in the follow-
ing order: Place the glass wool plug in the inlet end of
the trap, follow with the OV-1. Tenax, - ilica gal,. char_-
coal, and finally, the second glass wool plug. Reversing
the packing order, i.e., placing the charcoal in the trap
first will cause the silica gel and Tenax layers to be-
come contaminated with -har:?al dust causing poor cessrption
-------
efficiencies. Install the trap so that the effluent
from the purging device enters the Tenax end of the trap.
1.3.1.2 Glassware
a. Screw-cap vials - 40 ml with Teflon-lined caps
b. 10 al» 50 ml, and 100 nil volumetric flasks
1.3.1.3 Analytical balance
1.3.1.4 Roller aill and 1/4 in. stainless steel ball bearings
1.3.1.5 Catalytic gas purifier
1.3.1.6 Purging gas - He or N2, water compressed, high-purity
grade
1.3.1.7 Syringes - 10 ul, 100 1, 1 ml and 5 ml gas-tight.for
quality control spiking. A large bore 10-ml syringe is
used for saaple handling. A 20-ml gas-tight syringe is
used for preparing standards of neat gaseous compounds.
1.3.1.8 Purgeable - organics-free water. See Section 1.5
a. Activated Carbon-Calgon ?iltrasorb-200 or equivalent
1.3.1.9 Trap Packing Materials
a. 37. 07-1 on Chromosorb-W 100/110 mesh
b. Tenax-CC®- 60/80 mesh
c. Silica gel - Davison Grade 15 35/60 mesh or equivalent
d. Coconut charcoal - 26 mesh Barhaby Chaney No. CA-580-
26, Lot No. M-2649 or equivalent, as used in NIOSH
charcoal adsorption tubes, available through Supelco,
Inc. (Cat. No. 2-0267).
3
-------
1.3.1.10 Glass wool - Cleaned by thorough rinsing with hexine,
dried in a 110eC oven, and scored in a hexane-rinsad
glass jar with TIT -lined cap.
1.3.2 ~or Ouantitacion and Identification
1.3.2.1 Gas Chromatograph-mass spectrometer dtta system. Finrigan
• 4000 or equivalent - The GC/MS interface she-Id be a glass
jet separator. The computer system should allow acquisition
and storage of repetitive sc?r data thr ughout the GC/MS
runs. Computer software should be available to allow
searching of GC/MS data for display of extracted icn cur-
romt profiles (EIC?) and integration of the peaks. The
GC/MS should be fitted with a stainless steel or glass
column packed with 0.2" Carbowax 1500 or Carbopack^C.
Typical column dimensions are 8 ft x 1/3 in. OD stainless
steel or 6 ft :: 2 ma ID glass.
1.3.2.2 Reference naterials - Assayed quantity of compounds of
interest, and/or diluted standard solutions of compounds
of interest and internal standard compounds in nethanol.
1.3.2.3 Mass spectrometer calibration uoapouwd - p_-fluorobroao-
benzene.
1.4 Sampling and Tresarvation
1'. 4.1 Sampling
Samples must be collected in 40-al screw-cap vials with :ero head
space and sealed with Teflon-lined taps. 3ef:re using, wash all
4
24 i<
-------
sample bottles and TFi seals in detergent, rinse with tap water
and finally with distilled water. Allow the bottles .and seals to
air dry at rood temperature, heat in a 105°C oven for 1 hr, then
allow to cool in an area known to be free of organics. NOTZ:
Do not heat the TFS seals for extended periods of time (nore than
1 hr) because the silicone layer slowly degrades at 105°C.
1.4.2 Preservation
As a general guideline, ice samples immediately after collection,
refrigerate at 4eC> and purge within 10 days. Desorb "the trap
and complete the analyses immediately after purging.
1.4.3 Solids Determination
The total solids content of the sample is determined in duplicate
by weighing two ^ 1 ml aliquots of the extractable sludge sample
before and after drying overnight at 110*C. The general procedure
outlined in Standard Methods f.or the Examination of Water and Waste-
water, 14th ed. > for the determination of Total Dried Residue (Part
208A) at 103 to 105°C is applicable.
1.5 Preparation of Purgeable -Organic-Pree Water
Organic-free water is generated by passing tap water through a carbon
filter bed containing about 1 Ib of activated carbon and purged with pre-
purified N2, preferably overnight. A Millipore Super-Q Water System or
its equivalent may be used to generate organic-free deionized water.
Organic-free water can also be prepared by boiling distilled water for
15 min and transferring, while still hot, to a glass-stoppered bottle.
5
-------
Cool to room temperature. Continuous purging of che organic-free water
with pre-purified ^2 =isy be used during storage to r.ini=.iie contamination
with volatile organic compounds. Test organic-free water daily by analyz-
ing according to this method (see Section 1.9).
1.6 Preparation of Standards
1.6.1 Analytical Standards
Although this protocol assumes the preparation of standard solu-
tions from assayed reference materials, cocaercia.ily prepared stock
solutions, such as Supelco, Inc., Purgeable Seacards, nay be used
for analytical and fortification standards with appropriate dilution.
1.6.1.1 Preparation from neat compounds - 7rom individual assayed
reference materials prepare standard stock solutions (at
approximately 2 ug/ul) by adding, from a lOC-ul syringe,
1 to 2 drops of the 99+" pure reference standard tc meth-
anol (9.8 ml) contained in a tared 10-al volumetric flask
(weighed to the nearest 0.1 ag). Add the component so
that the two drops fall into the alcohol and do not con-
tact the neck of the flask. (Prepare gaseous standards,
i.e., vinyl chloride) in a similar asr-er using a 20-al
syringe (20 ml) with the gaseous compound. Weight the 13-
ml volumetric flask containing 9.3 til cf aethyl alcohol to
0.1 ag. Lower the syringe needle to aocut 5 m aocve t.-.e
aethvl alcohol meniscus and si owl'.- inject tna st^ncarc
-------
into the flask. The gas rapidly dissolves in the methyl
alcohol. Reweigh the flask, and use the weight gain to
calculate the concentration of the standard. Dilute to
volume, mix, and store in the sealed flask. Gas stock
standards are generally stable for at least 1 week when
maintained at less than 0"C. With the exception of 2-
chloroethylvinylether, stock standards of compounds that
boil above room temperature are generally stable for at
least 4 weeks when stored at 4°C. (Safety Caution: Be-
cause of the toxicity of most organohalides, dilutions
should be made in a glove box suitable for handling car-
cinogens. It is advisable to use an approved respirator
when high concentrations of -such materials must be- handled
in a fume hood).
From the primary stock solutions, prepare a multicomponent
secondary dilution mixture in methyl alcohol at'a concen-
tration of 1 ug/ml containing each of the compounds to be
determined. Assuming storage at 4CC, prepare a fresh mul-
ticomponent secondary dilution mixture on a weekly basis.
Daily prepare 10 ml of a 50 ng/ml standard from the 1 yg/
ml multicomponent standard by dosing 500 yl into -v 9 ml of
organic-free water, and adjusting the volume to 10.0 ml.
Analyze 1 ml and 5 ol aliquots of the aqueous standard
-------
Stock, solutions, as received are stored in a freezer vhea
not in use. To prepare a working standard, '25 ul of both
Purgeable Standard A and Purgeable Standard B are added
to •v 99 ml of organic-free water. Subsequently, 100 ul
of Purgeable Standard C and 50 ul of the acrolein/acrylo-
nitrile standard are added and the final volume adjusted
to 100 ml. Final concentrations for Purgeable A and B
compounds are 50 ng/ml. Final concentrations of Purgeable
C compounds are 200 ng/ml, and acrolein/acrylonitrila are
present at 500 ng/nl in the standard. Analyses of 1 r^l and
5 ml of this mixed standard (after volume adjustments to
10 ml with orgaaic-free water), will produce responses
nominally corresponding to 50 ug/liter and 250 ug/liter,
or 50 ng and 250 ng, respectively.
Prepare a fresh aqueous working standard on a dailv basis.
1.6.2 Internal Standard Spiking Solution
Although this protocol assumes the preparation of the standard so-
lutions from neat authentic compounds, appropriate reliable commer-
cial preparations may be used as suitable substitutes.
1.6.2.1 Preparation from neat compounds - From stock standard -
solutions prepared as above, add a volume of standard to
give 1,000 ug each of bromochiorccethane, 2-bromo-l-
chloropropane, and 1,4-dichlorobutane to «; ml of organic-
free water (blank water) contained in a 50-ml vcl-jmatric
Q
-------
flask, mix and dilute to volume. Dose 9.0 ul of this
internal standard spiking solution into every sample and
reference standard analyzed. Prepare a fresh method re-
covery spiking solution on a weekly basis. Prepare the
stock standard solutions monthly, or sooner if deteriora-
tion is indicated.
1.6.2.2 Preparation from commercial mixed stock solution - As an
alternate to preparation of the mixed internal standard
solution from neat compounds, a commercially prepared
stock mixture may be employed. The method outlined be-
low is specifically designed for use with the Supelco,
Inc., mixed stock internal standard solution which con-
tains 20 mg/nl of each compound.
1.7 Sample Preparation and Purging
1.7.1 Sample Compositing
VOA samples are collected at discrete time intervals by grab sam-
pling. When VOA results for relatively long time intervals, such
as 24 hr, are necessary or desirable, compositing of several VOA
grab samples must be performed. To do this, normally six VOA grab
samples (i.e., one 40-ml grab sample collected every 4 hr over a
24-hr period) will be composited. After storage, sample disrup-
tion with a. glass stirring rod may be necessary to remove the san-
ple from the VOA vial adequately. Care must be taken to avoid
10
246^
-------
displacement losses when the stirring roc -'s used. The chilled
samples are mixed with gentle swirling in 3. 250-ml round-bet torn
flask. Vigorous mixing must be avoided to prevent analyte losses.
Analysis should be performed immediately after compositing. In
cases where this is impossible or when sarnie material is to be
retained for future reference, aliquots of the composited VOA sam-
ples are returned to VCU vials with rero headspace and refrigerated
at 4"C. Normally, only four full VOA vials of composized material
can be prepared from six individual grab samples.
1.7.2 Sample Preparation and Purging
Condition the trap at 200°C with a flow of nitrogen or helium.
Turn off gas flow to the purging device.
Transfer that amount of sludge which contains greater than 50 ng
dry solids (i.e., 1 ml for a 5% sludge) to the syringe body. As-
semble the syringe body and plunger. Adjust the sludge aliquot
to a volume containing 50 mg dry solids. Add internal standard
to the adjusted sample aliquot through the syringe outlet. Trans-
fer the sample to the purging device. Rinse the syringe with
organic-free water and add to the purging device. Bring the level
in the purging device to the 10-ml mark with organic-free water.
Prior to purging, place c. glass wool plug in the top of the purge
tube to dispense excessive foam. Seal the purging device, and turn
on the gas flow to the purging device and adjust to a flow rate of
approximately 40 ml/min.
11
247<
-------
Purge the sample for 12 ^-fn while maintaining the sample and trap
at room temperature.
1.8 Analysis of the Sample ?urge
Analyze the sample purge by GC/MS using the 0.2% Carbowax 1500 on 80/100
mesh Carbopack C column described ia Section 1.3.2.1 operated with a He
carrier gas flow of 30 ml/min. Heat the trap to ISO to 200*C. Sackflush
it for 3 min into the gas chromatograph with the oven at 40°C. Hold the
oven temperature at 40°C for 3 min during the desorption stage. Immedi-
ately after desorption initiate .temperature programming. For 8-ft stain-
less steel columns a programming rate of 10°C/min to 170*C should be used.
For 6-ft glass columns a program rate of 6°C/min to 170°C is effective.
Hold at this temperature until all compounds of interest have eluted. The
purging device must be removed from the instrument and thoroughly rinsed
with copious volumes of volatile organic-free water between each sample
(nominally three rinses of *v 30 ml volume per rinse). Thoroughly•clean
the purging device according to procedures in Section 1.4.1 between par-
ticularly dirty samples. The trap must be conditioned at 180°C with flow
for 5 to 7 min between each sample. The MS should be repetitively scanned
ovejt the range m/e 20 to 275 at 3 to 5 sec/scan.
1.9 Purgeable Organies Analytical Quality Assurance
In addition to the instrumental quality assurance procedures specified in
Sections 1.9.1 and 1.9.2, analyses of replicate and fortified samples and
blanks ara required to indicate the method precision and accuracy. Since
the method precision may be very dependent on the sample matrix, the
12
243^
-------
.9.4 Fortified and Duplicate Samples
1-9.4.1 Sample Selection
After the analysis of samples collected at the first sam-
pling time, spike and analyze duplicate sample aliquots
from the first samples. For example, for a survey program
sampling a POTW plant daily for 4 to 6 days, collect trip-
licate samples for the first day. After ccmplecing analyses
of one set of the 1st day samples, spike and analyze dupli-
cate 1st day samples. Spike the 1st day samples using
procedures described in Section 1.9.4.2. The frequency
of selecting spiked duplicate samples for analysis for
sampling programs longer than 6 days should be date —ir.ed
from the detention times of the sludge types samples so
as to reflect possible changes in sample matrix.
1.9.4.2 Fortification Procedures
Add one or two stainless steel ball bearings (1/8 in.
diameter) to an empty vial and determine the tare --eight.
Fill the vi^l with sludge and reueigh; the weight differ-
ence determines the wet contents of the vial.
Fortify the sample with all of the compounds noted in "-able
1.1 to produce a final concentration two times the concen-
tration found in the unspiked sample, or 10 time3 the lower
limit of detection reported in Table A-l whichever is
14
-------
greater. Generally, blanket fortifications of analytes
can be accomplished using commercially available mixed
standards; however, for analytes present in unusually high
concentrations, supplemental fortification with an indi-
vidual solution may be required. -Seal the vial and place
on a roller mill in a 4°C cold room; roll the sample for
16 hr before analysis.
The fortified sample is handled as a regular sample during
analysis. The quantity of fortified sample analyzed aust
be equal the quantity of original unfortified sample ana-
lyzed.
1.10 Cata Handling
Using the characteristic retention times and ions listed in Tables 1.2
and 1.3, obtain extracted ion current profiles (EIC?s) of the character-
istic ions for each compound. Verify the presence of compounds of inter-
est based on the coincidences of peaks in the characteristic EICPs at
the appropriate retention times with intensities in the characteristic
ratios.
Calculate the concentrations of compounds identified by comparing Che
areas of the primary (highest abundance) ion peaks with the areas- o£ the-
corresponding standard peaks. If the sample matrix produces a significant
interference with the primary ion EIC?, a secondary ion plot may be used
for quantitation. Tor some analytes, such as toluene and ethylbenzene,
15
-------
it say be necessary to use ions of substantially lower intensity, e.g.,
n/e 93 or 107 for quantitative evaluation. Calculate the concentration
in the sample as follows:
\ /BIS\ /N\
— I — • ug/liter analyte in wet sludge
where: A » area of peak in sample
B » area of peak in standard
Aj£ * area of internal standard peak in sanple
BTS * area of internal standard peak in standard
N « nanograms in standard
V - volume of wet sludge analyzed (ml)
16
-------
Table 1.0. Stock VGA Standards Available ?rom Suoelco
Purgeable A
Purgeable 3
Purgeable C
Dichloroaethane
1,1-Dichloroethylene
1,1-Dichloroethane
Chloroform
Carbon tetrachloride
1,2-Dichloropropane
Trichloroethylene
1,1,2-Trichloroethan'e
Dibroaochloroaethane
Tetrachloroethvlene
Trifluoromethaae
tran'S-l,2-Dichloroethylene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1,1-Trichlofoethane
Broaodichlorcaiethane
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
cis-l,3-DlchloropTopene
Benzene
Bronofora
1,1,2,2-Tetracnloroethane
Toluene
Zthylbenzene
Chloromethane
Dichlorodifluoromechane
Broiaamethane
Vinyl chloride
Colcroethane
17
-------
Table 1.1. Volatile Organics Detectable With the ?iiree-And-Trao Method
Comoound
Cotroound
F/Cl/Br/Methanes
Methylchloride (chloromethane)
Methylene chloride (dichloromethane)
Chlorofora (trichloronethane)
Carbon tetrachloride
(tetrachlorotnethane)
Methylbromide (bromomethane)
Bromoforra (tribromomethane)
Chlorodibromoinethane
Bronodichloromethane
Dichlorodifluoroaethane
Trichlorofluoronethane
Cl-Ethanes
Qiloroethane
1, 1-Dichlc roe thane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1, 1-Trichloroethane
1,1, 2-Trichloroethane
1,1,2, 2-Tetrachloroe thane
Cl-3enzenes
Benzene
Chlorobenzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Cl-Zth-vlenes, Frooane
Vinylchloride (chloroethylene)
1,1-Dichloroethylene
(1,1-dichlcroethene)
Trans-1,2-dichloroethylene
(Trans--!., 2-dichloroethene)
Trichloroethylene (trichloroethene)
Tetrachloroethylene
(tetrachloroethene)
1,2-dichloropropane
1,2-dichloropropylene
Trans-1,3-dichloropropene
Cis-1,3-dichloropene
Alkenes
Acrolein (propenal)
Acrylonitrile (propene ^itril3)
Ethers
Bis-chloromethylether*
(sym. -dichlorodiaethylether)
2-Chloroethylvlnylether
(2-chloroethyl ethenylether)
Bis-(2-chloroethyl) ether
(3,3*-dichlorodiethylether)
Bis-(2-chloroisopropyl) ether
(S,S'-dichlorodisopropyl ether)
3is-Chloromethylether has a half-life of about 10 seconds in aqueous mixtures,
18
-------
Table 1.2. Elution Order of Volatile priority pollutants^'
C oapound
Chloroaethane 0.152
Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.172
BromcBethane 0.181
Vinyl Chloride • 0.186
Chloroethane 6.204
Methylene Chloride 0.292
Trichlorofluoromethane 0.372
1,1-Dichloroethylene 0.380
Br omochl or otne thane (IS) 0.457
1,1-Dichloroethane 0.469
Trans-1,2-dichldroethylene 0.493
Chloroform 0.557
1,2-Dichloroethane 0.600
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.672
Carbon Tetrachloride 0.684
Brosnodichloromethane 0.750
Bis-chloromethyl ether 0.760
1,2-Dichloropropane .- 0.818
Trans-1,3-dichloropropene 0.847
Trichloroethylene 0.867
Dibromochloromethane 0.931
Cis-l,3-dichloropropene 0.913
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.913
Benzene 0.937
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether 0.992
2-Bromo-l-chloropropane (IS) 1.000
Bromoform 1.115
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroechene 1.262
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1.281
1,4-Dichlorobutane (IS) 1.312
Toluene 1.341
Chjorofaenzene 1.489
EtHylbenzene 1.814
Acrolein Unknown
Acrylonitrile Unknown
£/ "These data were obtained under the following conditions: GC column -
stainless steel, 8-ft long x 0.1 in. I.D. packed with Carbopack C
(60/80 mesh), coated with 0.27. Carbowax 1500; carrier flow - 30 si/
Bin; oven cesperature - initial 60°C held for 3 min, programmed
8°C/min to 160°C and held until all conpounds eluted.
_b/ Retention times relative to 2-bromo-l-chloropropane with an absolute
retention tiae of 829 sec.
19
-------
CABZ1EX GAS R.OW CONTROL
PtESSUBE ZEGUIATC*
UOLBO INJECTION POUTS
PURGi GAS
COKT7.CL \
!3X MCUCUU8
aev? HUES
COLUMN OVEN
CONFIRMATORY COLUMN
COLUMN
HEATeS CONT7CL
NOT& ALL UNES
TIAf AND OC
SHOULTl !H H£ATH)
P«JIGING DEVK2 TO SO*C
Figure 1.1 - Schematic of Purge and Trap Device - Purge Mode
20
-------
CARRIES CAS aow CONTROL
UOUtO INJECTION POSTS
COLUMN OVEN
PRESSURE REGULATOR
V
PURGE GAS . .
FLOW CONTROL X|
ISX MOLfCULAR
OPTIONAL 4-?ORT COLUMN
SELECTION VALVE
TRAP INLET (TENAX END)
VALVE / RESISTANCE WTR£
HEATS CS
NOT& ALL LINES SETWEN
TRAP AND GC
SHOULD BE HEATS
TO 80-C
PURGING OEVJCE
Figure 1.2 - Schematic of Purge and Trap Device - Desorb Mode
21
-------
1/16" x 1/4"
Swage lock Reducing
Union, Bored Through
Wool
(Optional) for
Foaming Problems
to Trap
Sintered
Glass Frit,
4-8 Micron
1 .5 cm
1/4" O.D. Exit
O-Ring-
38 cm
Helium Purge Gcs
figure 1.3 - Sludge Purging Tube
-------
PACKING PROCEDURE
CONSIRUC1IOH
MUUIPURPOSf HAT
. *
GlASi WOOl 5MM
ACIIVAUO CHARCOAL 7.7CM
ORAOI IS
N> SIIICA Oil 7.7CM
LJ
%
8
*
n
UMAX 7.7CM
37. OV-I KM
GlAJi WOOt
JMM
•*" ^
^r
* •'/
\
^
^
i
L':.
'•'?;•
n,'/
;-o^
%'
>..'»
'/>/
M:
n
»&
s/s
7«/fOOI RCSISIANCf
WIRI WRAPI'IO SOIIU _f=.--~-'
(DOUBli lAVtRj
ISCM
~~-K
i /inni ofdifAtjrc
A-V/IUUI nijui^nv*
WIRt WHAPPll) $Olll>
(SINGH IAYIR)
8CM— *-
L
c
-^C
^-c
c
c
r
v^
C
c
c
^•^
C
c
c
" C
c
c
—
J-*-^ AND IIRRUIIS
P
?.
>
) ItlfRMOCOUPlE/CONIROUfft
__-^ — — — """" SINSOR
:' [ IUCIRONIC
" «v
)^^^ ^^_ IIMPIRAIURE
~) ^^^^^ CONIROl
J) •^'//^~ AflD
^ / PTHOMIUR
^> /
I
^ I
^ 1 IUBING JSCM O.IOS IN. ID
-* I OUS IN. O.O. SIAINIESS Slid
> /
^IS
•-
o
IHAP imil
Figure l.'i — Trap Packings and Conutrucl: ton
-------
Table 1.3. Characteristic Ions of Volatile Orzanics
Compound
El Ions
(Relative Intensity)
:n .sea to
Cuantifv
Chloromethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
3rozoraethane
Vinyl chloride
Chloroethane
Methylene chloride
Trichlorof luoroniethane
1,1-Dichloroethylene
Brcaochloromethana (IS)
1,1-Dichloroethane
Trans-1,2-dichloroethylene
Chloroform
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1,1,-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
3roziodichlor one thane
3is-chloromethyl ether
1,2-Dichloropropane
Trans-1,3-Dichloropropens
Trichloroethylene
Dibro-mochloratoethane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Benzene
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether
2-3romo-l-chloropropane (IS)
Broraofona
1,1,2,2-Tezrachloroethene
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,4-dichlorobutane (IS)
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Aero lain
AcTvionitrile
50(100); 52(33)
85(100); 87(33); 101(13); 103(9)
94(100); 96(94)
62(100); 64(33)
64(100); 66(33)
49(100); 51(33); 84(86); 86(55)
101(100); 103(66)
61(100); 96(80); 98(53)
49(100); 130(88); 128(70); 51(33)
63(100); 65(33); 83(13); 85(8); 98(7);
100(4)
64(100); 96(90); 98(57)
83(100); 85(66)
62(100); 64(33); 98(23); 100(15)
98(100); 99(66); 117(17); 119(16)
117(100); 119(96); 121(30)
83(100); 85(66); 127(13); 129(17)
79(100); 81(33)
63(100); 65(33); 112(4); 114(3)
75(100); 77(33)
95(100); 97(66); 130(90); 132(85)
129(100); 127(78); 208(13); 206(10)
75(100); 77(33)
83(95); 85(60); 97(100); 99(63);
132(9); 134(8)
78(100)
63(95); 65(32); 106(18)
77(100); 79(33); 156(5)
171(50); 173(100); 175(50); 250(4);
252(11); 254(11); 256(4)
129(64); 131(62); 164(78); 166(100)
83(100); 85(66); 131(7); 133(7);
166(5); 168(6)
55(100); 90(30); 92(.10)
91(100); 92(.78)
112(100); 114(33)
91(100); 106(33)
26(49); 27(100); 55(64); 56(83)
26(100); 51(32); 52(75); 53(99)
50
101
94
62
64
84
101
96
128
63
98
73
30
78
106
77
173
164
168
55
92
" i ?
106
-------
Table 1.4. a-Fluofobrcnotrszene Ions and Ion Abundance Criteria
Ion Abundance Criteria
50 20-40% of base peak
75 55-757. of base peak
95 base peak
174 75-987. of base peak
175 5-97. of m/e 174
176 75-987. of base peak and
93-997. of n/e 174
177 0-57. of m/e 176
25
-------
2.0 METHOD FOR SEMIVOLATTLZ C5.GANICS
2.1 Scope and Application
2.1.1 Scope
This method applies to the determination of the base, neutral, and
acid-extractable organic compounds as described in Table 2.1.
2.1.2 Application
The method is for the measurement of these compounds in municipal
wastevater sludges. It can be used as a qualitative and semiquantita-
tive screening procedure for the analyses of priority toxic orjanics
in surveys of sludges from municipal wastevater treatment plants.
As a screening tool, the procedure requires the use of a GC/HS.
spectrometer as the final detector.
2.2.1 This method (Figure 2.1) uses wet sludge/solvent extraction aided
by a high-speed homogenizer. The extract is separated by centri-
fugation and removed with a pipette. Sludges are extracted at ?H
S 11 and again at pH £2 to extract base/neutral and acidic com-
pounds, respectively. Both extracts are cleaned by gel permeation
chromatography (G?C) and semivolatile organic priority pollutants
are determined in the cleaned extracts by GC/HS.
The method is recommended for use only by experienced organic
analysts or by competent personnel under the close supervision of
an experienced organic analyst. '>i_: 1 <-
A*O _*_^
26
-------
2.3 Apparatus
2.3.1 For sampling, extraction and extract cleanup.
2.3.1.1 Imulsifier-Tekaar Tissuenizer, or equivalent, high capacity,
2.3.1.2 Centrifuge.
2.3.1.3 Centrifuge tubes with in-lined screw caps, 250 ml or
.larger capacity.
2.3.1.4 Kuderaa-Danish (K-D) Glassware -
a.. Snyder Columns - 3 bulb, macro and micro
b. Evaporating flasks - 500 ml
c. Receiver Ampuls - 10 ml, graduated, with spring
attachment.
2.3.1.5 Water or steam bath for Kuderaa-Danish concentrations.
2.3.1.6 Chromatographic (.Drying) Co limn - Pyrex (400-mm by 20-ca
ID) without a fritted plate.
2.3.1.7 Separators funnels - 500 ml with teflon stopcock.
2.3.1.8 Syringe - 100 ml, Pyres, with long needle.
2.3.1.9 Graduated cylinder - 500 ml.
2.3.1.10 Vials - 1 dram (^ 4 ml) with TFZ-lined screw caps.
* 2.3.1.11 Sample bottles - 1,000 ml or 4,000 ml glass with in-lined
screw caps.
2.3.1.12 G?C - Analytical Biochemistry Labs, Inc. G?C Autoprep
1002 or equivalent with a 25 mm ID column containing 50 to
60 g of SioBeads SX-3.
2.3.1.13 Syringe filter holder - stainless steel and TFZ, Gelaan
4310, or equivalent.
27
-------
2.3.1.14 Bottles - 500 ml, brown glass.
2.3.2 For identification and quantitation.
2.3.2.1 Gas chromatograph/mass spectrometer with data systam -
Finnigan 4000 or equivalent. The GC/MS interface should
be a glass jet separator. The computer system should ailcw
acquisition and storage of repetitive scan data throughout
the GC/MS runs. Computer software should be available to
allow searching of GC/MS data for display of estracted ion
current profiles (EICPs) and integration of the peaks.
GC columns required are:
a. 1.8 m x 2 mm ID glass packed with 17. SP-2250 on 100/
120 mesh Supelcoport.
b. 0.9-1.8 m x 2 mm ID glass packed with 1% SP-1240-DA
on 100/120 mesh Supelcoport.
2.3.2.2 Gas chromatograph/flaae ionization detection with the
same GC columns as for the GC/MS system.
2.3.2.3 Syringes, 10 and 100 ul.
2.3.2.4 Internal standard solution - D-10-anthracene, 2 yg/ul
in dichloromethane.
2.4 Reagents
2.4.1 For extraction and Extract Cleanup
2.4.1.1 Dichloromethane - Burdick and Jackson "Distill ir. Glass"
or equivalent, stored in original containers and used as
received.
28
-------
2.4.1.2 Hydrochloric acid (HC1) - 6 H.
2.4.1.3 Sodium, hydroxide (NaOH) - 6 IT.
2.4.1.4 Sodium sulfate (^SO^.) - Anhydrous, granular. Clean by
overnight Soxhlet extraction with dichloromethane, drying
in a 110° oven, and. then heating to 650"C for 2 hours.
;Store in 110°C oven-or in glass jar closed with TFI®-lined
screw cap.
2.4.1.5 Glass wool - Cleaned by thorough rinsing with hexane,
dried' in a IIO'C oven, and stored in a hexane-rinsed glass
jar with TF2®-lined cap.
2.4.1.6 Boiling chips - silica or .carborundum.
2.4.1.7 G?C calibration solutions:
a. Corn oil - 200 mg/ml in dichloromethane.
b. .bis(2-ethylhexylphthalate) and pentachlorophenol - 4.0
mg/ml in dichloromethane.
2.4.2 Identification and Quantitation
2.4.2.1 Reference Materials - Assayed quantity of compounds of
interest (Table 2.1) and/or dilute standard solutions of
- compounds of interest in appropriate solvents.
2.4.2.2 Calibration Standards - bis-(pentafluorophenyl)phenyl
phosphine and D-10-anthracene.
29
-------
2.5 Preparation of Standards
Primary standard solutions may be prepared from the pure compounds by
dissolving 10 mg quantities into 10.0 ml of dichlcroaethane. Mixed
analytical standards may be prepared by diluting the primary solutions.
Analytical standards for all semivolatile compounds should be prepared in
three solutions. The acids standard should contain each of the phenolic
compounds at concentrations in the range of 50 to 200 ng/ul. 3/N/? com-
pounds should be split between two solutions, both at concentrations in
the range of 20 to 100 ng/ul. One standard should contain the more un-
stable 3/N compounds listed in Table 2.2 and the second should contain -the
remaining 3/N/? compounds. Analytical standards nay also be obtained from
I?A Effluent Guidelines Division or be prepared' by dilution of stock stand-
ard solutions purchased from chromatographic materials suppliers such as
Supelco, Inc. All working standards must include D-10-anthracene at 20
ng/ul.
2. 6 Sampling and Preservation
2.6.1 Sampling
Samples must be collected in glass containers (1,000-4,000 all with
".. a TFE-lined cap. The container should be prewashed with acetone
and dried before use. Containers should be filled no more than tvo-
thirds full with sample to minimize breakage during freezing.
30 265-
-------
2.6.2 Preservation
Preferably, samples should "be iced or refrigerated at ^"C for not
more than 24 hours before extraction. Where extraction cannot be
performed within 24 hours, saaples should be frozen. Samples cay
be stored for up to 30 days at -20°C or indefinitely at -75'C. In
order to prevent breakage during storage, the containers should not
be slightly warmed and then recooled. The iced or defrosted sample
should be homogenized by nixing for 1 minute with a tissuemizar
before analysis.
2.7 Sample Sxtraetion
2.7.1 Preparation of Drying Column
Immediately prior to extracting a sample, prepare a drying tube
for the extract. Place a small glass wool plug in the bottom of
the column and add anhydrous sodium sulfate to a depth of 10 to
15 cm.
2.7.2 pH Adjustment
Thoroughly mix the sludge sample by homogenizing in the sample
bottle for 1 minute, 4 samples at a time, then quickly remove an
- 80 ml aliquot into a 100 ml graduated cylinder. Transfer the
aliquot into a 250 ml centrifuge tube. Basify the 80 ml portion-
to pH i 11 with 6 IT sodium hydroxide solution. Mix briefly with
the homogenizer to insure uniform sample pH.
(Mote: If copious precipitation of carbonates is observed when
sodium hydroxide is added, make the sample slightly acidic with
31
-------
6 !T hydrochloric acid and allow the carbon dioxide evolution to
caa.se before basifying the sample.)
2.7.3 Extraction
Add 80 ml of dichloromethane to the sample and homogenize
for 45 to 60 sec. Do not homogenize more than 60 sec to avoid
heating the sample. Centrifuge the samples and extracts at 3,000
rpm for 30 minutes. Repeat centrifugation if satisfactory phase
separation is not achieved. The mixture will separate into an
aqueous layer over the dichloromethane extract with a solids cake
at the water-dichloromethane interface. Withdraw the extract from
each centrifuge tube with a 100 ml pipette. Discharge the extracts
into a 500 ml separately funnel. Drain the dichloromethane through
the drying column into a Kuderna-Danish evaporator. Retain any
aqueous layer and return it in approximately equal volumes to each
of the four centrifuge tubes.
Extract the sample two more times (to achieve three-fold extraction)
according to procedures described in Sections 2.7.3 and 2.7.4. Wash
the drying column, with an additional 100 ml of dichloromethane and
combine the eluent with the extracts.
2.7.4 Extract Concentration
Add a. boiling chip to the extract in the Kuderna-Danish evaporator
and concentrate the extract to -v 8 ml using a 85°C water bath or a
steam bath. If the extract is only slightly colored and not viscous
32 f~*t^'~*a-
-------
concentrate it further to 5 ml. If the extract solidifies after
cooling, dilute it to '8 ml. Transfer the extract to a. 10 ml
volumetric flask (or 10 ml graduated tube) , dilute to the nark
and store at 48C rot GPC cleanup.
2.7.5 Acidic Extraction
Acidify the sludge sample portions to pH S 2 with 6 N hydrochloric
acid and extract the sample again by procedures described in
Sections 2.7.. 3 to 2.7.4. Discard the extracted sludge aliquots.
2.8 Extract Cleanup
2.8.1 G?C Setup, .and Calibration
2.8.1.1 Packing the column - Place 50 to 60 g of Bio Beads -SX-3
in a 400 ml beaker. Cover the beads with dichloromethane
and allow the beads to swell overnight (before packing the
columns) . Transfer the swelled beads to the colunn and
start pumping solvent through the column, from bottom to
to top, at 5.0 ml/min. After —1 hour, adjust the pressure
on the column to 7 to 10 psi and pump an additional 4
hours to remove air from the column. Adjust the column
pressure periodically as required to maintain 7 to 10 psi.
2.8.1.2 Calibration of the column - Load 5 ml of the corn oil
solution into sample loop No. 1 and 5 ml of the phthalate-
phenol solution into loop No. 2. Inject the com oil and
collect 10 ml fractions (i.e., change fraction at 2 ainuts
33
-------
intervals) for 36 minutes. Inject the phthalate-phenol
solution and collect 10 ml fractions for 60 minutes. De-
termine the com oil elution pattern by evaporation of
each fraction to dryness followed by a gravimetric determi-
nation of the residue. Analyze the phthalate-phenol
fractions by GC/FTD on the SP-2250 and SP-1240-DA coluoss.
Plot the concentration of each component in each fraction
versus total eluent volume (or time) from the injection
points. Choose a "dump time" which allows >85Z removal of
the corn oil and ^85Z recovery of the bis (2-et'nylheryl)i-
phthalate. Choose the "collect time" to extend at -least
10 minutes after the elution of pentachlorophenol. "Wash"
the column 20 minutes^ between samples. Typical parameters
selected are: dump time, 20 minutes (100 ml) , collect
time, 30 minutes (150 ml) , and wash time, 20 minutes
(100 nl) . The column can also be calibrated by the -use
of a 254 nm UV detector in place of gravimetric and GC
analyses of fractions. Measure the peak areas at various
elution times to determine appropriate fractions.
2.S.2 Operation
Prefilter or load all extracts via the filter holder to avoid
particulates that might cause flow stoppage. Load one 5.0 ml
aliquot for extracts of 10 ml volume. Purge the sample loading
34
-------
tubing thoroughly with solvent between extracts. After aspeciaj.lv
dirty extracts, run a. G?C blank .(i. e.,, dichloromethane) to check
for carry-over. Process the extracts using the dump, collect, sad
wash parameters determined from the calibration and collect the
cleaned extracts in 500 ail brown bottles. Concentrate the cleaned
extractsr combining collected fractions from multiple injections,
to •v 10 si using Kuderna-Danish evaporators and then to •v 3 al
using micro Snyder columns. Transfer the cleaned extracts to 10
ml graduated tubes and dilute to 5.0 ml with dichloromethane.
Store at 4"C for GC/MS analysis. Intensely colored extracts nay-
require a second GPC cleanup. ..
2.9 Sanole Extract Analysis J
2.9.1 Acid.Extracts
GC/MS analysis - Analyze acid extracts by GC/MS using
the SP-1240-DA column described in Section 2.3.2.1,-
operated under the following conditions:
. Column temperature - 85*C for 4 'minutes, 85 to 200.*C
at 10"C/min and 200°C until after
the elation time for 4-nitrophenol.
Injector temperature - 185°C
GC/MS interface temperature - 275°C
Carrier gas - Helium at 30 ml/min
Injection size - 2 ul
35 27CK
-------
The MS should be repetitively scanned over the range
n/e 40 to 475 at 3 sec/scan. Immediately prior to analysis,
spike each extract with 50.0 ul of the internal standard
solution of 2.0 ug/ul D-10-anthracene in cichloromethane.
2.9.2 Base/Neutral Pesticide Extracts
'GC/MS analysis - Analyze the 3/N/? extracts by GC/MS
using the SP-2250 column described in Section 2.3.2.1
operated under the following conditions:
Column temperature - 50°C for 4 minutes, 50 to 260°C
at 10°C/ain, and 260"C until after
the elution tiae for benz[£,h_,^]perylene.
Injector temperature - 225*C
GC/MS interface teaperature - 275*C
Carrier gas - Helium at 30 ml/min
Injection size - 2 ul
The MS should be repetitively scanned over the range u/e
40 to 475 at 3 sec/scan.
Immediately prior to analysis, spike each extract with
50.0 yl of the internal standard solution, which contains
2.0 ug/ul D-10-anthracene in dichloronethane.
36
-------
2.10 Zxtractable Orsanies Analytical Quality Assurance
In addition to the instrumental quality assurance procedures specified1 ia
Se-ctions 2.10.1 and 2.10.2, analyses of replicate and fortified sacples an
blanks are required to indicate the method precision and accuracy. Since
the method precision may be very 'dependent on the sample matrix, the fre-
quency and selection of replicate and fortified samples, method and field
blanks, and fortified blanks is designed to provide soiae precision and
accuracy data for each sample matrix encountered and is consistent with
the objectives and limitations of screening analyses.
2.10.1 Method Blanks
Analyze one -method blank (i.e., organic-free water) and one
method blank spiked with each of the representative semi-
volatile compounds at 10 times the detection limits for
every 15 samples analyzed or at least once each month
that analyses are being conducted. Method blanks and
spiked blanks are extracted and the extracts cleaned by
the same procedures used for samples. Analyze extracts
of. spiked blanks by the GC/ilS procedures described in
Section 2.0. Analyze extracts of blanks by' GC/TTD using
the same chromatographic columns and conditions. Analyze
all blank extracts by GC/MS that exhibit peaks more
intense than the D-10-anthracene internal standard.
37
-------
.10.2 r.-alvtical Standards
2.1C.2.1 Acidic Compounds
2.10.2.2 Analytical Quality Assurance
2.lQ.2.2.a. Analyze daily a GC/XS quality assurance solu-
tion containing 10 ng/vl decafluorotriphenyl-
phosphine (DFTPP), and 20 ng/ul of D-10-anthra-
cene and 50 ng/yl A-r.irrophenol. Detection of
4-nitrophenol and the acceptability of the
DFTPP spectrum quality, based on the ion
abundance standards outlined in Table 2.3, are
necessary criteria for proceeding with sample
extract analyses.
2.10.2.2.0 Analyze daily a standard solution containing
f
each of the acidic compounds listed in Table
2.1 in the concentration range of 50 to 200 ng/
ul plus D-10-anthracene at 20 ng/yl. Response
factor data obtained from these standards are
used to estimate the concentrations of compounds.
identified in sample extracts.
2.10.2.3 Base/Neutral and Pesticide Compounds
2.10.2.3.a Analyze daily a GC/MS quality assurance
solution containing 10 ng/yl DrT??, 20 ng/ul
D-10-anthracene, and 50 ng/ul benzicene.
Detection of benridene and the ac-=ttabili:v
33
21""*'}.—
«^O^
-------
of che DFTP? spectrum quality (see Table
2.3) are necessary criteria for proceeding
with sample extract analyses.
2.10.2.3.b Analyze daily standard solutions containing
the base/neutral and pesticide compounds
listed in Table 2.1 in the concentration
range of 20 to 100 ng/yl plus D-10-anthraceene
at 20 ng/ul. Response factor data obtained
from these standards are used to estimate
the concentrations of compounds identified
in sample extracts.
2.10.3 Field Blanks
Extract an 80 ml aliquot of each field blank by bech extraction
with 3 100 ml portions of dichloromethane in a 1,000 ml separator?
funnel. Dry the extract by passage through a short column .'of an-
hydrous Na2SO£ and concentrate to 1.0 ml in a Kudema-Danish
evaporator. Analyze field blank extracts by CC/FID using the
chromatographic columns and conditions described in Section. 2.0...
Analyze all blank extracts by GC/MS that exhibit peaks more in-
tense than the D-10-anthracene internal standard.
2.10.4 Fortified and Duplicate Samples
2.10.4.1 Sample Selection - After the analysis of samples collected
at the first sampling tiae, spike and analyze duplicate
sample aliquots from the first samples. For example,
39
-------
for a survey program sampling s. POTW plane daily for 4
to 6 days, collect triplicate samples for the first day.
After completing analyses of one set of the first day
samples, spike and analyze duplicate first cay sanples.
Spike the first day samples using procedures described
in Section 2.10.4.2. The frequency of selecting spiked
duplicate samples for analysis for sampling rrograms
longer than 6 days should be determined from the deten-
tion tines of the sludge types sampled so as to reflect
possible changes in sample matrix.
2.10.4.2 Fortification Procedures - Spike an 30 ml aliquot of
sludge vith all of the compounds identified in the sample
and the representative semivolatile compounds listed in
Table 3.2 to produce a final concentration that is tvo
times the observed concentration or 10 times the .lover
limit of detection reported in Table 2.9, whichever
is greater. The spike should be contained in two
acetone solutions. The first contains, acidic and
neutral compounds and the second contains basic con-
pounds. The concentrations of the spiking solutions
should be such that 1 to 5 ml of each solution are
added to the sludge sample. Homogenize the spiked
sample for 45 to 60 sec and store at -°C overnight
before extraction and analysis.
-------
2.11 Data Handling
Using the characteristic retention times and.ions listed in Tables 2.4
to 2.6, obtian ZICP's of the characteristic ions for each compound.
Verify the presence of the compounds of interest based on the coincidences
of peaks in the characteristic ZICPs at the appropriate retention tiaes
with intensities in the characteristic ratios. Calculate the concentra-
tions of compounds identified by comparing the areas of the primary
(highest abundance) ion EICP peaks"with the areas -of the corresponding
standard peaks. If the sample matrix produces a significant interference
with the primary ion ZIC?, a secondary ion EIC? may be used for quantisa-
tion. Calculate the concentration of compounds identified in the 'sample
as follows:
-L,
_ , , _ i i - I ug/liter of analyte in wet sludge -•
y7!/ \VS/ l F
where:
A » area of peak in sample extract
3 = area of peak in standard
A^j * area of internal standard peak in sample extract
B^j = area of internal standard peak in standard
Vj_ - volume of extract injected (ul)
VE = total volume of extract (ml)
N = nanograms in standard
Vg = volume of wet sludge extracted (1)
F = fraction of extract cleaned by GPC for analysis (e.g.,
20 ml - .8).
25 ml
-------
Table 2.1. Seiaivolatile Organic Prioritv Pollutants
ACIDS
i-Chioro-3-methylphen.ol
2-Chlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
4,6-Dinitro~2-methylphenol
Benzidine
BASES
NEUT5ALS
?olycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Acenaphthene
Acenaph cylene
Anthracene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(a)pyrene
?hthalates
3is(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Butylbenzyl phthalace
Diethyl phthalate
Chlorinated Hydrocarbons
2-Chloronaphthalene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dcihlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Eexachlorobenzene
Chloroalkvl Ethers
3is-(2-chloroethyl) ether
3is-(2-chloroechoxy)nethane
2-Nitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
Pentachlorophenol
Phenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
Chrysene
Dibenzo(a,g)anthracene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
Hexachloroethane
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
1,2,5-Trichlorobenzene
3is-(2—chloroisopropyl) ethe:
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
42
277<
-------
Table 2.1 (Concluded)
NEUTRALS
Miscellaneous Neutrals
4-3romophenyl phenyl ether
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
2,4-DiAitrotoluene
N-Nitrosodiethylamine
N-Nitrosodimethylaaine
S-Indosulfan
a-3HC
T-3HC
S-3HC
Aldrin
Heptachlor
Heptachlor epoxide
a-Endosulfan
-Dieldrin
4,4'-DDE
PESTICIDES
2,5-Dinltrotoluene
Isophorone
Nitrobenzene
N-Ni tr o s o diphenylanine
4,4'-DDD
4,4'-DDT
Endrin
Endosulfan sulfate
6-BHC
Chlordane
Toxaphene
.PC3-1242
PCB-1254
43
-------
Discard
Sludge
Sludge
(320ml.)
Adjust to pH> 11
with 6£J NoOH
Extract 3X with CH2Cl2
by Homogeni ration/
Centrifugation
Sludge
Adjust to pH< 2
with 6M HC1
Extract 3X wirh CH2CI2
by Homogenization/
Centrifugation
Dry with Na2$O4
Clean Up by GPC on
Bio Beads SX-3 Eluted
with CH2CI2
Determine Phenols
by GC/MS
on SP-1240-OA
txtract
Dry with
Clean Up by GPC on
Bio Beads SX-3 Eluted
with CH2CI2
Determine Base/Neutrcls
& Pesticides by GC/MS
on SP-2250
Analysis Scheme for Senivolatile Organics
-------
Table 2.2. Unstable 3/N Compounds
bis(2-Chloroiso?ropyl) ether
Nitrobenzene
N-Nitroso-di-h-propvlanine
bis(2-Chloroechoxy) methane
Isophorone
2,6-Dinitrotoluena
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine
Bensidine
3,3'-Dichlorobensidiae
N-Ni tr o sodimethylamina
Table, 2.3. DrTPP Kav Ions and Ion Abundance Criteria
Mass Ion Abundance Criteria
51 30-60Z of mass 198
68 less than 22 of aass 69
70 less than 27. of mass 69
127 40-60% of mass 198
197 less than 1% of mass 198
198 base peak, 100% relative
abundance
199 5-9% of mass 198
275 10-30% of mass 198
'365 1% of mass 198
441 _ less than mass 443
442 greater than 40% of mass 198
443 17-23% of mass 442
45 28CK
-------
Table 2.4. Acid Comoounds
Compound Name
RRT-/
D-10-Anthracene
Characteristic
El Ions (Rel. Int.)
2-Chlorophenol
2-Nitrophenol
Phenol
2,4-Dimethyl phenol
2 , 4-Dichlor opheriol
2,4, 6-Trichlorophenol
4-Chloro-m-cresol
2 , 4-Dinitrophenol
4 , 6-Dinitro-o-cresol
Pentachlorophenol
4-Nitrophenol
0.38
0.43
0.50
0.58
0.60
0.74
0.83
1.03
1.04
1.15
1.70
128(100), 64(54), 130(31)
139(100); 65(35), 109(8)
94(100), 65(17), 66(19)
122(100), 107(90), 121(55)
162(100), 164(50), 98(61)
196(100), 198(92), 200(26)
142(100), 107(80), 144(32)
184(100), 63(59), 154(53)
198(100), 182(35), 77(28)
266(100), 264(62), 268(63)
65(100), 139(45), 109(71)
a/ Column: 1.2 m x 2 mm ID glass; 1% SP-1240 DA on 100/120 Supelcoport;
He at 30 ml/min.
Program: 85°C for 4 min, then 10°C/iain to 200°C and hold for 15 ain.
46
2Si<
-------
Tab1e 2.5. Base-Neutral Compounds
Compound Nasne
1 , 3-Dichlorobenzene
1 , 4-Dichlorobenzene
Hexachloroethane
1 , 2-Dichlorobenzene
3is(2-chloroisopropyl) ether
Hexachlorobutadiene
1 , 2 , 4-Trichlorobenzene
Napthalene
3is(2-chloroethyl) ether
Hexachlo rocy clopentadiene
Nitrobenzene
3 is ( 2-chloroe thoxy) methane
2-Chloronaphthalene
Acenaphthylene
Acenaphthene
Lsophorone
Tluorene
2, 6-Dinitro toluene
1, 2-Diphenylhydra2ine^/
2, 4-Dinitro toluene
N-Nitrosodiphenylasine-^
Jexacj jprpbeazeme
4-3romophenyl phenyl ether
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Diaethyl phthalate
Diethyl phthalate
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Benzidine'
Sutylbenzyl phthalate
Chrysene
Di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
3enzo (a) anthracene
Di-n- octylphthalate
Benzo Cb) f luoranthene
3enzo (k) f luoranthene
3enzo(a)pyrene
Indeno (1,2, 3-cd) pyrene
RRT^
D-10-Anthracene
0.31
0.33
0.35
0.35
0.37
0.48
. 0.49
0.51
0.55
0.59
0.45
0.50
0.68
0.75
0.77
0.47
0.85
0.81
0.87
0.85
0.89
0.92
0.92
1.00
1.00
0.78
0.87
7.18
1.22
1.09
1.27
1.34
1.40
1.37
1.41
1.41
1.43
1.43
1.50
1.86
Characteristic
El Ions (Rel. Int.)
146(100), 148(64), 113(12)
146(100), 148(64), 113(11)
117(100), 199(61), 201(99)
146(100), 140(64), 113(11)
45(100), 77(19), 79(12)
225(100), 223(63), 227(65)
74(100), 109(80), 145(52)
128(100), 127(10), 129(11)
93(100), 63(99), 95(31)
237(100). 235(63), 272(12)
77(100). 123(50), 65(15)
93(100), 95(32), 123(21)
162(100), 164(32), 127(21)
152C100), 153(16), 151(17)
154(100), 153(95),' 152(53)
82(100), 95(14), 138(18)
166(100), 165(80), 167(14)
165(100). 63(72), 121(23)
77(100), 93(58), 10.5(28)
165<100.), 63(72), 121(23)
169(100), 168(71), 167(50)
284(100), 142(30), 249(24)
248(100), 250 (99), -141 (45)
178(100), 179(16), 176(15)
178(100), 179 (16), -176(15)
163(100), 164(10). 194(11)
149(100), 178(25), 150(10)
202(100), 101(23), 100(14)
202(100), 101(26), 100(17)
149(100), 150(27), 104(10)
184(100), 92(24), 185(13)
149(100), 91(50)
229(100), 229(19),' 226(23)
149(100), 167(31), 279(26)
228(100). 229(19), 226(19)
149(100), 167, 279
252(100), 253(23), 125(15)
252C100), 253 G3), 125(16)
252(100), 253(23), 125(21)
276C100), 138(23), 277(27)
47
-------
Table 2.5 (Concluded)
Compound Name
RRT
D-10-Anthracene
Characteristic
El Ions (Rel. Int.
3eazo(g,h,i)perylene
N'-Ni tr o s o dimethy lamina
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
3,3' -Dichlorobenzidine
2,3,7, 8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
Bis (chloromethyl) ether
Deuterated anthracene (dlO)
1.98
0.15
0.42
0.85
1.45
1.33
—
1.00
276(100)
42,100),
130(22),
204(100)
252(100)
322(100)
45(100) ,
188(100)
, 138(37), 277(25)
74(88), 44(21)
42(64), 101(12)
, 206(34), 141(29)
, 254(66), 126(16)
, 320(90), 59(95)
49(14), 51(5)
, 94(19), 80(18)
a/ 1" SP-2250 on 100/120 mesh Supelcoport in a 1.8 m x 2 mm ID glass column;
He at 30 ml/min. Program: 50"C for 4 min, then 10eC/min to 260°C and
hold for 15 min.
b/ Elutes as azobenzene.
c/ Zlutas as diphenylaniine.
48
-------
Table 2.6. Pesticides
ConrDound Name
D-10- Anthracene
Characteristic
El Ions (Rel . Int . )
S-endosulfan
a-BHC
Y-BHC
S-BHC
Aldrin
Heptachlor
Heptachlor epoxide
c-Zndosulfan
Dieldrin
4,4' -DDE
4,4' -DDD
4,4' -DDT
Endrin
Endosulfan sulfate
0.47
0.94
1.00
1.03
1.05
1.06
1.13
1.14
1.18
1.20
1.22
1.27
1.30
1.30
201(100), 283(48), 278(30)
183(100), 109(86), 181(91)
183(100), 109(86), 181(91)
181(100), 183(93), 109(62)
66(100), 220(11), 263(73)
100(100), 272(60), 274(46)
355(100), 353(79), 351(60)
201(100), 283(48), 278(30)
79(100), 263(28), 279(22)
246(100), 248(64), 176(65)
235(100), 237(76), 165(93)
235(100), 237(72) , 165(59)
81(100), 82(61), 263(70) .
272(100), 387(75), 422(25)
o-BHC
Chlordane
Toxaphene
PC3-1242
PC3-1254
1.04
1.05-1.26
1.12-1.35
0.86-1.14
1.09-1.30
183(100), 109(86), 181(90)
373(19), 375(17), 377(10)-'
(231, 233, 235)£/
(224, 260, 294)£7
(294, 330, 362)-£7
a/ 1% SP-2250 on 100/120 mesh Supelcoport in a 1.8 ni x 2 sm ID glass
colimn; He at 30 ml/min. Program: 50° for 4 min, then 10*C/
min to 260° and hold for 15 min.
b/ These three ions are characteristic for the a and f forms of
chlordane. No stock should be set in these three for other
isomers.
c/ These ions are listed without relative intensities since the
mixtures they represent defy characterization by three masses.
49
-------
APPENDIX I
-------
Table A-2. Fortification Detection Liaits for Base, Neutral, Pesticide,
and Acid Zxtractable Organic Priority Pollutant Compounds
Detection Li=it "°
ng/uil CociDound
< 10 Naphthalene
Fluorene
Di-n-butylphthalate
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Ac enaph thy1ene
Diethylphthalate
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
1,2-diphenylhydrazine
Phenanthrene/anthracene
10 - 20 2-Chloronaphthalene
Acenaphthalene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Butylbenzylphthalate
Benzo[a]pyrene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Diaiethylphthalate
Di-n-octyl?hthalate
4-Chlorophenylphenylether
Hexachlorobenzene
Benzidine
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
4,4'-DDE
4,4'-DDT
Toxaphene
Chrysene/benzo[a]anthracene
20 - 30 m-Dichlorobenzene
> o-Dichlorobenzene
-------
Table A-2 (Concluded)
Detection Limit Range
ng/ml
Cotroound
30 - 40
40 - 50
50 - 100
230
240
200
630 - 600
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
a-BHC
T-3HC
Endrin
Heptachlor
2-Chlorophenol
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine
o-BHC
2,4-Dimethylphenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
Nitrobenzene
Bis (2-chloroethoxy)aethane
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
8-3HC
Heptachlor epoxide
Dieldrin
2-Nitrophenol
Trichlorophenol
p-Chloro-m-cresol
Pentachlorophenol
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
p-Nitrophenol
Isophorone
2,4-Dinitrophenol
SLJ Detection limit based on standard responses and a mininrua count of 1,000
for compound identification. Detection limits are for the original
analyte concentration in sludge and presumes use of this protocol.
54
-------
SECTION III
-------
made up to 10 ml volumes with organic-free water. The
resultant analyte concentrations are 5 ug/liter and 25
ug/liter (or 50 ng and 250 ng analyte weights, respec-
tively) .
Since reduced sensitivity is frequently observed for the
more volatile purgeabie compounds, including acrylonitrile,
bromomethane, chlorraethane, coloroethane, dichlorodifiuoro-
methane, and vinyl chloride, these compounds should be
present in the aulticcmponent standard at higher concen-
/
trations. A four-fold increas-e in the concentrations of
bromomethane, chloromethane, chloroethane, dichlorodiflu-
OTomethane, and vinyl chloride to produce 4 ug/nl final
concentrations of these compounds in the nulticomponent
secondary dilution will result in more reliable analyta
responses. Similarly, a five-fold increase in the- acryio-
nitrile concentration to 5 ug/ml in the multicomponent
standard is also desirable.
1.6.1.2 Preparation from commercial mixed stock solutions - As an
alternate to the preparation of standards from neat mate-
rials, high concentration stock mixtures of volatile or-
ganic priority pollutaats may be purchased commercially.
The method outlined below is specifically designed for
utilizing stock mixtures available from Supelco, Inc.
290-
-------
INTERIM REPORT
QUALITY ASSURANCE FOR LABORATORY ANALYSIS
OF
129 PRIORITY POLLUTANTS
PREPARED FOR:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
PbNiTORiNG & DATA SUPPORT DIVISION
OFFICE OF WATER PLANNING & STANDARDS
401 M STREET, S.W.
WASHINGTON, D,C. 20460
PREPARED BY:
VEESAR INC.
5621 ELECTRONIC DRIVE
SPRINGFIELD, VIRGINIA 22151
(703) 750-3000
CONTRACT No, 58-01-5908
TASK 1,4
FEBRUARY 4, 1980
-------
QUALITY ASSURANCE FOR. LABORATORY
ANALYSIS OF PRIORITY POLLLTCANTS
i Preface
ii List cf Tables
iii List:- of Figures
Acknowledgements
I ESiTKJCUCTION
II GENERAL QUALITY CONTROL CONSIDERATIONS AND ANALYTICAL
iMETHODDLCGIES
III PRIORITY POLLUTANT LABORATORY QUALITY CCNTJOL
IV PERFORMANCE CONTROL LIMITS FOR PRIORITY POLLUTANTS
-------
TABLE OF C3N7:NT3
Chapter
PREFACE .
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
IMPORTANCE OF QUALITY CONTROL I-1
1.1 General - [
1.2 Quality Assurance Programs -1
1.3 Analytical Methods -2
1.4 Reference —
LABORATORY SERVICES :-[
2.! General . 2-!
i: Distilled Water M
2.3 Compressed Air 2-5
2.4 Vacuum . 2-5
2.5 Hood System 2-5
2.6 Electrical Services 2-5
2.7 References 2-5
INSTRUMENT SELECTION 3-1
3.1 Introduction 3-1
3.2 Analytical Balances 3-1
3.3 pH:Selective-Ion Meters 3-3
3.- Conductmry Meters 3-5
3.5 Turbidimeters (Nephelometers) 3-T
Spectrometers 3-3
Organic Carbon Analyzers 3-13
Gas Chromatographs 3-i-
Ri ferences 3 -1 -
GLASSWARE -i
-.! General —!
4.2 Types of Glassware — 2
4.3 Volumetric Analyses . . —3
~ - Federal Specifications :"cr Voiumecr.c Glassware —4
4.5 Cleaning of Glass and Porcelain ~-5
45 Special Cleaning Requirements 4-c
4." Disposable Glassware —"
4.3 Specialized Glassware —"
4.? F-::ed Ware —i
4 10 References ~-y
REAGENTS. SOLVENTS. AND GASES
5 . introduction
5.2 Reagent Quality -;
-------
5.3 Elimination of Determinate Errors
5.4 References
6 QUALITY CONTROL FOR ANALYTICAL PERFORMANCE . . . a- 1
5.1 Introduction ......... • • • • • . f-i
6.2. The Industrial Approach co QC ........... 6-1
6.3 Applying Control Chans in Environmental Laboratories ... 5-2
6 A Recommended Laboratory Quality Assurance Program . . . 6-9
5.5 Outline of a Comprehensive Quality Assurance Program . . . 5-iO
6.6 Related Topics ................. 6-13
6.7 References ........................ 6-! 3
7 DATA HANDLING AND REPORTING . .7-1
?. I Introduction ............ . ..... 7-i
7.2 The . Analytical. Value ..... •. ........ 7-1
7.3 Glossary of Statistical Terms ............... 7-3
7.4 Report Forms .... ............. ... . 7-5
7.5 References .......................... 7-11
8 SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR TRACE ORGANIC ANALYSIS . . 3-1
8.1 'Introduction ..................... 8-1
8.2 Sampling and Sample Handling ............... 8-1
3.3 Extract Handling ................. 3-4
3.4 Supplies and Reagents . . . • ... . . . . .... 8-5
8.5 Quality Assurance .............. . . .8-7
8.6 References ............... ..... 8-10
9 SKILLS AND TRAINING" ...... ....... 9-1
9.1 General .................. 9-1
9.2 Skills ............... . . 9-2
9.3 Training ................... . . 9-4
10 " WATER AND WASTEWATER SAMPLING ....... 10- 1
10.1 Introduction .......... : ........ ... . 10-1
10.2 .Areas of Sampling ............... 10-2
10.3 References .................. 10-6
11 RADIOCHEMISTRY .................. !Ul
It. I Introduction ........ . . ... 11-1
11.2 Sample Collection . ... .11-1
11.3 Laboratory Practices . . . . 11-2
1 1.4 Quality Control . . ... 1 l-t
1 1.5 References . . . .
12 MICROBIOLOGY ........ ...
12.1 Background ........ .... .
12-2 Specific Needs in Microbiology . .
12.3 Intralaboratory Quality Control . 12-2
12.4 Interiaboratory Quality Control . . 12-2
1 2.5 Development of a Formal Quality Assurance Program 1 2-3
1 2.5 Documentation of a Quality Assurance Program 1 2-3
-------
12.7 Chain-of-Custody Procedures for Microbiological Samples ---3
12.8 References . 12-10
13 AQUATIC BIOLOGY . . .. :3-l
13.1 Summary of General Guidelines i 3-1
13.1 Discussion ... . 13-2
13.3 Rsferancs .... . 13-4
14 LABORATORY SAFETY . . L-M
14.1 Law and Authority for Safety and Health 14-1
14.2 EPA Policy on Laboratory Safety 1—5
14.3 Laboratory Safety Practices 14-7
14.4 Report of Unsafe or Unhealthful Condition 14-15
14.5 References . 14-15
Appendix A-Suggested Checklist for the Safety Evaluation of EPA Laboratory Areas A-1
v\i
-------
PREFACE
The following Quality Assurance Guide for laboratory Analysis of
Priority Pollutants vas produced at the request of the Monitoring
and Data Support Division of the Office of Water Planning and
Standards to support the National Urban Runoff Program surveillance
and analysis effort. The objective of this report is to reflect
EPA's best effort and understanding of what steps and actions are
required to define the meaningfulness of laboratory analysis.
-------
LIST OF TAHT.K
1. Priority Pollutant Fractions to be Analyzed
2. Purgeable Organic Fraction
3. Base/Neutral Fraction
4. Acid Fraction
5. Pesticide Fraction
6. Metals Fraction
7. Conventional Fraction
8. Priority Pollutant Batch Size Effect on Relative QC Effort
9. Standard C.C Format (example)
10. Surrogate Recovery Format (example)
11. Purgeable Fraction - Matrix Effect Spike
12. Purgeable Fraction - Surrogate Spike
13. Acid Fraction - Matrix Effect Spike
14. Acid and Base/Neutral Fraction - Surrogate Spike
15. Base/Neutral Fraction - Matrix Effect Spike
16. Pesticide Fraction - Matrix Effect Spike
17. Metals Fraction - Matrix Effect Spike
18. Conventional Fraction - Matrix Effect Spike
19. Possible Sources of Standards
20. Intra- Laboratory Comparison
21. Purgeable Organics
22. Acid Fraction
23. Base/Neutral Fraction
24. Pesticide Fraction
25. Metals, Cyanide and Phenolics
26. Priority Pollutant Surrogates
-------
LIST ..OF FIGOPES
1. Handbook for Analytical Quality Control
2. Surtnary of Required Samples and Audits for Priority Pollutant
Analysis
iii
-------
JONCWLEDGEMESTS
This document rests en the work and cones about throught the
efforts of numerous laboratories and scientists. Stable anoung
the contributors are R.D. Kleopfer and B.J. Fair less at Region VII,
Kansas City, Kansas; D. Ballanger and staff at EMSL, Cincinnati,
Ohio; and the Versar Inc. staff at Springfield, Va.
-------
This document defines those actions that must be taken to assure than
valid priority pollutant data is produced by analytical laboratories. The
general day-to-day procedures will be referred to as quality control (QC)
activities. The implementation coordination and supervision of these proce-
dures will be referred to as quality assurance (QA) activities. In this
broader sense, the program will cover the four major aspects of a quality
assurance program. Under the title of good laboratory practice will be
covered reference to all aspects of laboratory operation. The main areas of
procedures and methods will also be summarized. The major effort in this
program will be to develop a workable day-to-day QC model and, secondly, to
provide the detail control limits against which to measure a laboratory's
performance.
The methodologies and procedures, as well as associated good laboratory
practice, required to do the analysis will be defined primarily through
references. All references, to procedures and methods are based on EPA usual
practice. EPA concludes that these methodolcgies are adequate for priority
pollutant analysis. The adequacy of the data produced has been recently sum-
marized in an EPA report as follows:
"Vfe can be. confident that false positive analysis are
considerably less likely than false negative analysis
so that when a priority pollutant is detected in the
environment, we know the measured quantity is probably
smaller than the true value."
Two principal areas specific to priority pollutants are addressed in
this presentation. The first spells out those actions that must be taken to
assure that data produced will be of known quality. The second presents
criteria against which analytical data can be judged. Taken together, this
document will assure data that is statistically valid, defensible and of
known precision and accuracy.
For cost study work where the priority pollutants are really unknown,
where matrix effects are undefined and where sampling conditions are uncertain,
the procedures and QC practices specified here represent the most cost-effective
3CCK
-------
solution to a complex problen. As routine monitoring crograms cevelcc, a
relative reduction in the required quality control activities and, her.cs,
the cost is expected. Such considerations in cost reduction fall into a
broader management purview of quality assurance than this document addresses.
A comprehensive Laboratory Quality Control Program attempts to answer
the following sorts of questions:
(1) Are the field samples contaminated?
(2) Is the analytical instrument working?
(3) Are all matrix effects under control?
(4) Was each sample properly handled in the laboratory?
(5) Is the precision of the analysis in the acceptable range?
(£) Is the laboratory uncontaminated? "
Unless the answer to all of these questions is "yes," there is reasonable
doubt, for every sample batch, that valid data is being acquired. These
questions are answered by analyzing, along with the samples, solutions pre-
pared to address these concerns. A sample is defined as that portion of wacer
chosen to characterize a specific site. Any other solution is to be considered
as a quality control audit. This distinction can be made clear by considering
a duplicate sample taken in the field. One of the pair is a sample scluticr.
and the other a quality control audit solution. The comprehensive set cf CC
audit solutions to answer *11 of the above concerns include:
(1) A field blank
(2) A method standard
(3) A duplicate spiked with compounds of interest
(4) A duplicate analyzed
(5) A laboratory blank
The rain control objectives and many minor control objectives can be accom-
plished by running five quality control checks with each batch cf tr-venty
samples ccirrleted in one day. This -model will be expanded in detail considering
the entire pncri-y pollutant list cf organic and inorganic parameters in
Section "~.
-------
The 129 toxic and/or priority pollutants are giver.'in Tables 2-7. This
QA document addresses all of these except asbestos which is not within the
scope of this work. The toxics are grouped and named by their analytical
nethcdologies. The class names of the toxics and the number of class members
are defined in Table 1.
302<
-------
TABLE 1
PSJDRTTY POLLDTANT FRACTIONS
TO BE ANALYZED
General
Group
Organic
Parameters
Inorganic
Parameters
Class Name
Purgeables
Acids
Base/Neutrals
Pesticides
Metals
a. flame atonic
absorption
b. furnace atomic
absorption
c. cold vapor atomic
absorption
Ccraron
Abbreviation
VQA
A
B/N
P
AA
FAA
Mo. of Elements
or Compounds
31
11
46
25
10
2
1
Conventional, CN~ and
Phenol
Asbestos - not covered in this
document
Total
129
-------
TABLE 2
ORffiNICS FRACTION
(1) Acrolein (30) Trichlorofluoromethane
(2) Acryionitrile (31) Vinyl Chloride
(3) Benzene
(4) Brorodichloromethane
(5) BromofoCT
(6) Broncrrethane
(7) Carbon Tetrachloride
(8) Chlorcbenzene
(9) Chlorodibrortorethane
(10) Chloroethane
(11) 2-Chloro(ethyl vinyl) ether
(12) Chloroform
(13) Chloromethane
(14) Dichlorcdifluoromethane
(15) 1,1-Dichloroethane
(16) 1,2-Dichloroethane
(17) 1,1-Dichloroethylene
(18) Trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
(19) Dichlororrethane
(20) 1,2-Oichloropropane
(21) Cis-l,3-Dichloropropene
(22) Trans-1,3-Diohloropropene
(23) Ethylbsnzene
(24) 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
(25) Tetrachloroethylene
(26) Toluene
(27) 1,1,1-Trichlcroethane
(23) l,i,2-Trichlorcethane
(29) Trichloroethylsne '
304<
-------
TABLE 3
BASE/NEUTFAL FSACTICN
(1) Acenaphthene (26)
(2) Acenapthylene (27)
(3) Anthracene (28)
(4) Benzidine (29)
(5) Benzo(a)anthracene (30)
(6) Benzo(b)fLuoranthene (31)
(7) Benzo(k)fluoranthene (32)
(8) Benzo(a) pyrene (33)
(9) Butyl Benzyl Phtha.late (34)
(10) Bis(2-chlorcethyl) Ether (35)
(11) Bis(2-chloroethoxy) Methane (36)
(12) Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) Ether (37)
(13) 3is(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate (38)
(14) 4-Brorcphenyl Phenyl Ether (39)
(15) Butyl Benzyl Phthalate (40)
(16) 2-Chloronaphthalene (41).
(17) 4-Chlorophenyl Phenyl Ether (42)
(18) Chrysene (43)
(19) Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene (44)
(20) Di-n-butyl Phthalate (45)
(21) 1,2-Dichlorobenzene (46)
(22) 1,3-Dichlorcbenzene
(23) 1,4-Dichlorcbenzene
(24) 3,3'-Dichlorcbenzidine
(25) Diethyl Phthalate
Dimethyl Phthalata
2,4-Oinitrotoluene
2,6-Dini trotoluene
Di-n-octyl Phthalate
1,2-Oiphenylhydrazine
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiere
Hexachloroethane
Isophorone
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
N-ni trosodime thy lar^ine
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamirjs
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
305
-------
TABLE 4
ACID FRACTION
(1) 2-Chlorophenol
(2) p-dloro-ov-cresol
(3) 2,4-Dichlorophenol
(4) 2,4-Oimethylphenol
(5) 4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
(6) 2,4-Dinitrcphenol
(7) 2-Nitrophenol
(8) 4-Nitrophenol
(9) Pentachlorcphenol
(10) Phenol
(11) 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
-------
TABLE 5
PESTICIDE FRACTION
(1) Aldrin
(2) alpha-BK:
(3) beta-BIE
(4) ganma-BKC
(5) delta-BHZ
(6) Chlordane
(7) 4,4'-ODD
(8) 4,4'-CDE
(9) 4,4'-DDT
(10) Dieldrin
(11) Endosulfan I
(12) Endosulfan II
(13) Endosulfan Sulfate
(14) Endrin
(15) Endrin Aldehyde
(16) Heptachlor
(17) Heptachlor Epoxide
(18-24) PCS (7 Aroclors)
(25) Toxaphene
307<
-------
TABLE 6
METALS FRACTION
(1) Antimony
(2) Arsenic
(3) Beryllium
(4) Cadmium.
(5) Chromium
(6) Copper
(7) Lead
(8) Mercury
(9) Nickel
(10) Selenium
(11) Silver
(12) Thallium
(13) Zinc
TABLE 7
CONVENTIONAL FRACTION
(1) Cyanides
(2) Total Phenols
308<
-------
13.
II GENERAL QUALITY CONTROL CONSI-EPATIGNS AND ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGIES
A. laboratory Good Practice
The Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory document (EPA-
600/4-79-019) contains all of the salient considerations which can fern the
general base for any Laboratory Quality Assurance Program. This document is
available in Icoseleaf form and should be used by all laboratories in these
programs. The abstract, and table of contents are included in this section
to show the scope of its concerns (Figure 1).
B. Priority Pollutant Methodologies
The methods required to do the 129 priority pollutants are found in
the following:
• "Sampling and Analysis Procedures for Screening of
Industrial Effluents for Priority Pollutants," U.S.
EPA, Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory,
Cincinnati, OH 45263, March 1977 (revised April 1977).
• "Handbook for Analytical Control in Water and Wastewater
Laboratories," U.S. EPA, Environmental Monitoring and
Support, Cincinnati, OH 45268, March 1979.
The documents are available from the Environmental Monitoring and
Support Laboratory (Cine.). In addition, various other aspects of the required
methods will be found in the following two references:
• "Procedure for Preliminary Evaluation of Analytical
Methods to be Used in the Verification Phase of the
Effluent Guidelines Division BAT Review," U.S. EPA,
Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory,
Cincinnati, OH 45263, March 1978
• "Addendum for Sampling and Analysis Procedures for
Screening of Industrial Effluents for Priority Pollu-
tants," U.S. EPA, Environmental Monitoring and Support
Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH 45268, April 1979.
And, lastly, the alternative methodologies recently proposed ara found' i-.:
• Federal Register, Volume 44, No. 233, December 3, 1979.
"Guidelines Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis
cf Pollutants, Proposed regulations."
309<
-------
11.
FIGURE I
HANDBOOK FOR ANALYTICAL QUALITY CONTROL
IN WATER AND WASTEWATER LABORATORIES
Environmental Monitoring & Support Laboratory
(Cincinnati)
* Abstract
• Table of Contents
31CK
-------
ABSTRACT
One of the fundamental responsibilities of water and waste-water management is the
establishment of continuing programs to insure [he reliability and validity of analytical
laboratory and field data gathered in water treatment and wastewater pollution control
activities.
This handbook is addressed to laboratory directors, leaders of field investigations, and other
personnel who bear responsibility for water and wastewater data. Subject matter of the
handbook is concerned primarily with quality control (QO for chemical and biological :ests
and measurements. Chapters are also included on QC aspects of sampling, microbiology,
biology, radiochemistry. and safety as they relate Co water and wastswater pollution
control. Sufficient information is offered to allow the reader to inaugurate or reinforce
programs of analytical QC that emphasize early recognition, prevention, and correction of
factors leading co breakdowns in the validity of water and wastewater pollution control
data.
Lll
-------
Ill PSICSTTY PCIiLTANTS - LABORATORY QUALITY CONTROL
A. Introduction
This section is a summary of the efforts in several ZPA and contract
laboratories to develop a meaningful cost effective quality control model.
A listing of required samples and controls for priority pollutant analysis
can be seen in Figure 2. The general CC model will be discussed in the
following sections as it is applied to each fraction of the priority pollutant
list of 129. Five control solutions most be evaluated with each batch of
samples. The impact of the number of samples in each batch is shewn in
Table 8. The 25 percent controls required by this mcdel presupposes very
little or no experience- with the sample types and specific fractions under
consideration. As a data base develops, one can envision that only samples
spiked with surrogates would be used in the presence of sufficient data. For
most developmental study work, however, the 25 percent baseline- will have to
be maintained to assure the quality of the agency data base. Lastly, this
section will specify the quality control, documentation requirements necessary
to support this effort.
B. Basic Terms
1. Sample
A sample is a representative portion of an item from which
characteristics of the whole can, be extracted. In this program, a sample is
the volume of properly preserved water required to analyze for a specific
pollutant(s) of a given fraction. If duplicate field samples are taken, the
second one will be referred to as a QC control or a QC audit solution.
2. QA Audit Solution
A QC audit solution is the volume of water used to test seme
varible that it is desired to control. Examples of such solutions are spiked
solutions, blanks of various kinds and, generally, any material that is used to
ascertain the validity of the data.
-------
•7
3U-MAPY CF REQUIRED SAMPLES .--^ CCJ-.TPCLS
FOR
PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSIS
Laboratory •
Sairinles Laboratorv
Method
Blank
I • 1
Spiked -vith Surrogate Solution
'— Spiked with Matrix Effect Solution
If, n = 20
Then, 25 saircles -.vould have to be analyzed
-------
13.
TABLE 8
PRIORITY POLLUTANT 3ATCH SIZE EFFECT ON
RELATIVE QC EFFORT
No. Sairoles in 1 Batch
No. QC Controls
% QC
1
2
5
10
15
20
5
5.
5
5
5
5
500
250
100
50
33
25
Batch sizes much greater than 20 are probably unrealistic.
-------
19.
The following subsections 3-15 are taken directly frcm a
Region '711 Document "Quality Assurance - Organic Parameters." Changes have
been made to make their suggestions relevant to this document and to r=rove
any responsibility for Region vn to provide either surrogate or matrix effect
spikes.
3. Volatiles
The laboratory shall run one duplicate (same sample run twice),
one field blank, one reagent blank (laboratory prepared "organic-free" water),
one method standard (standard addition to "organic-free" water), and one matrix
effect spike (standard addition to a sample) for each batch of samples processed.
The Laboratory shall calculate the percent recovery of the surro-
gates and the standards using the external standard quantitiation method. The
surrogate spikes will be added to every sample immediately before analysis
begins. The standard additions will be added and held for one hour prior to
the beginning of the analysis.
4. Extract"?bles - Acids and Base/Neutrals
The laboratory shall run one duplicate, one field blank, one
reagent blank, one method standard, and one matrix effect spike for each batch
(a group of samples from each plant studied) of samples processed. The pesti-
cides will be measured using the external standard method. The base/neutral
and acid fractions will be measured using the internal standard method.
5. Method Blank
The method blank is defined as an appropriate volume of "organic-
free" water which has been processed exactly as a sample (same glassware,
reagents, solvents, etc.). For the extractable parameters (3/N, A, P) , this
would recuire extraction of one liter of water. For the volatile fraction, 5
ml of "organic-free" water should be analyzed by the purge and trap methodology.
One method blank sample should be run with every batch of 20 or fewer samples.
Also, a r.ethoc blank should be run whenever a new source of reagent or solvent
is introduced into the analytical scheme. Reagents having background levels
315<
-------
that interfere with the compounds to be determined must be purified and shewn
to be free of known interferences or replaced with some that are acceptable.
6. Field Blank
It is the responsibility of the sampling team to provide the
appropriate field blanks to the analytical team. For the extractable para-
meters (B/N, A, P), the minimum requirement is to provide an appropriate volume
of blank water which has been processed through the sampling equipment in the
same manner as a sample. The field blank is then analyzed in the laboratory
as if it were a sample. When interferences occur, the analytical results must
be discarded or flagged so as not to result in the reporting of false positives
7. Replicates
To determine the precision of the method, a regular program of
analyses of replicate aliquots of environmental samples must be carried out.
At least two replicate aliquots of a well-mixed sample must be analyzed with
each set- of 20 samples or less analyzed at a given time. For those parameters
where a sufficient number (15 sets) of positive results are accumulated over
a period of time, precision criteria should be developed as described below.
After 15 replicate results have been obtained, calculate the.
range (Rj_) of these results as follows:
\ ' Xil - Xi2 ' (1)
where Rj_ is the difference between the results of the pair (X^j_ and X^)
from sample i=l through n. The concentration of each sample is represented
by the mean:
lv j.. v \
I A. -, f A. -;
where Xj_ is the average of the results of the replicate pair. A preliminary
estimate of the critical difference (Hj.) between replicate analyses for any
specific concentration (C) can be calculated as:
n n _
RC = 3.27 (C E Ri)/(E XL) (3)
i=l i=l
316<
-------
Fran these data develop a table of such R values for various C values that
span the concentration range of interest.
These preliminary critical difference values may be used to judge
the acceptability of the succeeding replicate results. To do this, calculate
the mean (X) and difference (R) between the replicate results. Referring to
the table of critical range values developed above, find the C nearest to X
and use its R_ to evaluate the accept .ability of R. If the R is greater than
Rj, the system precision is out of control and the source of this unusual
variability should be identified and resolved before continuing with routine
analyses. Record the results of all replicate analyses and periodically (after
25 to 30 additional pairs of replicate results are obtained), revise, update,
and improve the table of critical range values.
3. Matrix Effect Mditions to Samples
These are additions of known amounts of authentic standards to
the sample. The samples are then processed and analyzed in the same manner
as a sample. For the convenience of the analyst, a "reference" standard
addition should be provided. The "reference" standard should be prepared at
the same time that the samples are being spiked using the same piper and the
same standard solution or solutions. The volume of the "reference" should
then be adjusted by dilution, if necessary, to the same extract volume as will
be delivered for the spiked sample. The reference is extremely valuable in
determining accurate percent recovery because the same standard which was
added to the sample can be used for quantitation purposes. This eliminates
errors which might be introduced because of discrepancies between spiking
standards and quantitation standards.
Determine the recovery of the method for the analysis cf environ-
mental samples by adding a spike (Tj_, true value) sufficient to approximately
double the background concentration level (if known prior to extraction) of
the sample selected earlier for replicate analysis. If the original ccr.cer.tra-
ticn is higher than the midpoint of the standard curve (range cf the -ethod;,
then the 'Concentration of the spike should be approximately one-half the original
concentration, which assures that the final concentration is within the linear
ranee of the method. If the concentration cf the ori-ir.a_ Serbia was net
-------
22.
detectable, the concentration of the. spike should be 5 to 15 times the lewer
limit of detection. Generally, the concentration present in the sample will
be totally unknown prior to extraction; therefore, a spike which is 5 to 15
times above the lower detection limit is recommended. The volume of standard
added in aqueous solution should not dilute the sample by more than 10 percent.
The volume of standard added in an organic solvent solution should be kept
small (100 ul/1 or less)-
Analyze the sample, calculated the observed value (OjJ and the
solution concentration (Xj.), then calculate the recovery for the spike as
follows:
Pi = 100 (0L - Xi)/Ti (4)
where Pj_ is the percent recovery. If the sample was diluted due to the
addition of the-spike, adjust Xj_ accordingly.
After determining PI for at least 15 spike results, calculate
the mean percent recovery (?) and standard deviation (Sp) of the recovery as
follows:
_ n
P - (E P±)/n _ (5)
n
'-1 - (Z
(6)
where n = the number of percent recovery values available.
If the percent recovery of the spike is not within the interval
of ? - 3 S^, the system accuracy is out of control and the source of this
systematic error should be identified and resolved before continuing with
routine analysis.
-------
22.
At least one spiked sample must be analyzed along with each set
of 20 samples or less that is analyzed at a given time. This spiked data must
be obtained for each parameter of interest. Record the recovery data of all
spiked analyses and periodically (every 25 to 30 data points), revise, update,
and improve the accuracy criteria.
9. Matrix Effect additions to Blank Water (Method Standard)
These are additions of known amounts of authentic standards to
the water blank immediately before extraction. The samples are then processed
and analyzed in the same manner as a sample. The standards should be approxi-
mately equal to the concentration found in routine samples.
Analyze the standard and calculate Oj_ (the observed value) . The
percent recovery (Pj_) is then calculated as follows:
100 (0.)
Pi« T_ X (7)
where T.. = the true value.
After determining the Pi for approximately 15 check standards,
calculate the mean (P) and standard deviation (Sp) of the percentages as
follows:
(8)
n
and:
1 n n
L I P.2 - (I P) Vn (9)
n-1 " 'i
where n = the number of results available.
If the percent recovery for succeeding standard additions is r.ct
within the interval of ?~ - 2 Sp, the system should be checked for problems.
If crcblans ex^st, they must be resolved before continuing with routine analysis.
-------
24.
At least one blank water standard addition most be analyzed along
with each set of 20 samples or less that is analyzed at a given time. These
data must be obtained for each parameter of interest. Record the recovery of
all blank water standard additions and periodically revise, update, and improve
the accuracy criteria.
10. Surrogate Spikes
These are standards which are added to every sample prior to
analysis. The standards chosen should be chemically similar to compounds in
the fraction being analyzed. Also, the standards should be compounds which
would not likely be found in environmental samples. The purpose of the surro-
gate spike is to provide quality control on every sample by constantly moni-
toring the unusual matrix effects, gross sample processing errors, etc. The
surrogate spike should not be used as an internal standard for quantitation
purposes. Analyze the' spike extract and calculate Oj_ (the observed value) .
The percent recovery (Pj_) is then calculated as follows:
100 (0.)
Pi
where Tj_ = the true value.
After determining the Pj_ for approximately 15 spikes, calculate
the mean (P) and standard deviation (Sp) of the percentages as follows:
(12)
u
and
/ , |~n n
"5=rlz V - (E p)'/n
sp
where n = the number of results available.
(13)
-------
If tiie percent recovery for succeeding spikes is not within the
interval of P t 3 Sp, the system should be checked for problems. If prcbisrs
exist, they must be resolved before continuing with routine analysis. Peccrd
the recovery of all spikes and periodically revise, ocdate, and improve the
acceptance criteria as defined in section IV.
11. GC/MS cvM-ihi-ation Check
For the base/neutral fraction, run decafluro-criphenyLphcsphir.e
(DFTPP) daily according to EPA procedures. The requirement is for 20 nancgrams
of DETPP to meet the specifications..
For the volatile fraction and the acid fraction, run pentaflurc—
bronobenzene (PFBB) daily according to EPA procedures. The requirement is for
100 nanograms of PFBB to meet the specifica-cion.
12. GC Performance Check
For the base/neutral fraction, run benzidine daily either separately
or as a part of a standard mixture. The requirement is to be able to chrocatc-
graph the compound at the 100 nancgram level.
For the acid fraction, run pentachlorophencl daily either separately
or as part of a standard mixture. The requixarent is to be able to chraratc-
graph the compound at the 100 nancgram.. level.
For the pesticide fraction, run Aldrin daily either separately cr
as part of a standard mixture. An injection of 100 cicccrams should give a
recorder response of at least 50 percent full-scale deflection.
13. Inter-Laboratory Quality Control
In addition to establishing the precision and accuracy of the
method and routinely analyzing replicate and spiked samples, the laboratory zrust
also analyze a quality control (QC) check sample, at least once annually, for
parameters of interest as they are available from the Quality Assurance Branch,
Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory (Ci.-cirjiati} .
-------
14. Quantitation
External Standard Method
The external standard method is recommended for quantitation of
parameters frcm the pesticide fraction and the volatile fraction. Prepare
a master calibration curve using a minimum of three standard solutions of
each of the compounds that are to be measured. Plot concentrations versus
integrated areas or peak heights (selected characteristic ion for GC/MS or
electron capture response for GC/EC). One point, on each curve should approach
the method detection limit. Once the master set of instrument calibration
curves have been established, they should be verified dally by injecting at
least one standard solution. If significant drift has occurred, a new cali-
bration curve will have to be constructed. The concentration of the unknown
can be calculated from the slope and intercept of the curve. If the curve is
linear and the intercept is zero, the. unknown concentration can be determined
by the following equations:
For extractables:
Micrograms/liter
' _ ng standard
standard area
(A) (B) (Vt)
{Vi} (VS}
B *•' sample aliquot area
V. = volume of extract injected (yl)
V. = volume of total extract (ul)
V = volume of water extracted (ml)
For volatiles:
Micrcgrams/liter =
_ (A) (B)
(14)
(15)
V
Vo = volume of water purged (ml)
322*
-------
Internal Standard Method
The internal standard method is recotmended for quantitaricn cf
parameters from the base/neutral fraction and the acid fraction.
This method is preferred when the internal standard meets the
following conditions:
a. Does not interfere with other components
b. Elutes close to peaks of interest
c. Approximates concentration of unknown
d. Structurally similar to unknown
The utilization of the internal standard method requires the
periodic determination of response factors (R) which are defined as follcwsL
R = fs^LS. (16)
AIS Cg
Ag is the integrated area or peak height of the characteristic ion for the
priority pollutant standard.
integrated area or peak height of the characteristic ion for the
internal standard.
Cjs is the concentration of the priority pollutant standard.
By adding a known concentration of internal standard (Crg) to
every sample extract, one can then calculate the concentration of priority
pollutant (CcO in the extract using:
The concentration of priority pollutant in the origir>al sampl
is given by:
C- VTT
c0 - ^
whera '/r- is the volume of nhe extract and VQ is the volume of the crigiral
samcis.
-------
23.
The response factor (R) most be determined over ail concsntrad.cn
ranges of standard (Cs) which are being determined. (Generally, the amount
of internal standard •?iffif*3 to each extract is the same so that Cj£ ranains
constant.) This should be done by preparing a calibration chart where the
response factor (R) is plotted against the standard concentration (Cs) using
a minimum of three concentrations over the range of interest. Once this
calibration plot has been determined, it should be verified daily by injecting
at least one standard solution containing internal standard. If significant
drift has occurred, a. nevr calibration curve will have to be constructed.
To quantitate, add the internal standard to the concentrated
sample extract no more than a ferf minutes before the measurement to protect the
standard from losses due to evaporation, adsorption, or chemical reaction.
Calculate the concentration, if unknown, by using the previous equations with
the appropriate response factor taken from the calibration curve. (Ideally,
the response factor will hot change with concentration.)
15. Quality Assurance Documentation
Standard formats are to be utilized for reporting quality assurance
data. One form would summarize all relevant data concerning_blanks, standard
additions, and replicates for each parameter (see Table 9). A second form
would summarize surrogate recoveries for each fraction type (see Table 10)_^
Other forms would provide daily records of GC/MS calibration checks and GC
performance checks.
16. Combinations Used for Matrix Effect and Surrogate Spikes
A. Listing of Combinations and Concentrates
The following Tables 11 through 18 list the required materials
and range of spiking levels for matrix effect spikes and surrogate spike fcr
all fractions of the 129 priority pollutants. The following is a summary of
the requiranents.
324<
-------
Scike Tvce
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Fraction
Purgeables
Adds
Base/Neutrals
Pesticides
Metals
CN~, Phenol
Matrix Effect
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table
11
13
15 (Note: 4 mixes)
16 (Note: 5 mixes)
17
18
Surrogate
Table 12
Table 14
Table 14
None
None
None
B. Availability of Spiking Solutions
Either each laboratory must prepare all matrix effect and surrccazs
spikes or stock solutions are prepared at a central location and distributed
to each laboratory in a given program. In order to optimize data quality
at the minimum cost, the latter is the best approach. Region VIZ has provided
such a service in other programs and in the following section is preserving
the details of how they implemented such a program. If it is determined that
individual laboratories will prepare their own, see Table 19 for possible sources
of standards.
325 <
-------
30.
TABLE 9
STANDARD QC FORMAT (example)
Parameter Name - Matrix
Normal Detection Limit: 10 ppb
Date Sample £* Measured Value Amount Added Percent Recovery
10/11
10/11
10/11
10/11
10/11
10/11
1234
1234R
1234SS
1234SB
1234MB
1234FB ' "
40
60
75
45
<10
<10
0
0
50
50
0
0
— .
-
50
90
. -
-
Percent Recovery from Sample: P_ ± 3 Sp =
Percent Recovery from Blank: ,P.± 2 Sp =
Critical Differences betwe«=n Replicate Analyses:
*R = replicate; S3 = standard addition to- sample; SB = standard addition
to blank; MB = method blank,- FB = field blank
TABLE 10
RECOVERY FOEMAT (example)
Surrogate Name - Matrix
Normal Detection Limit:
Date Sample t Measured Value Amount Added Percent Recovery
10/11 1234 . 40 50 80
10/11 1235 '60 50 120
Percent Recovery from Samples: £ t 3
Percent Recovery from Blanks? P ± 2
-------
TABLE 11
FBACTION
MATRIX EFFECT SPIKE
Compound Approx. Cone, in Spike (cpb)
(1) Acrolein 240
(2) Acrylonitrile 110
(3) Benzene 20
(4) Brorcdichlorcmethana 20
(5) Bromoform 60
(6) Bronomethane 60
(7) Carbon Tetrachloride 20
(8) Chlorobenzene 20
(9 ) Chlorodibrcticraethane 20
(10) Chloroethane 60
(11) 2-Chloro (ethyl vinyl) ether 60
(12) Chloroform 20
(13) Chlorotiethane 60
(14) Dichlor Bifluorcmethane 60
( 15 } 1 , 1-Dichloroethane 20
(16) 1,2-Dichloroethane 20
(17) 1,1-Dichloroethylene 20
(18) Trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 20
(19) Dichloronethane 20
( 20 ) 1 , 2-Dichloropropane 2 0
(21) Cis-l,3-Dichloropropene 20
(22) Trans- 1,3-Dichlorcpropene 20
(23) Ethylbenzene 20
(24) 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ' SO
(25) Tetrachloroethylene 20
(26) Toluene 20
(21} 1,1, 1-Trichloroethane 20
(23) 1,1, 2-Trichlcrcethar.e 20
(29) Trichlcroe'chylene 20
(20) Tr^chlorofl'jornnerhane 20
(21) Vir.vl 'Chloride 60
-------
TABLE- 12
PUBGEftBLET FRACTION
SUBFCGATE SPIKE
Caiipjund Approx. Cone, in Spike (ppb)
cU benzene 30
o
cL toluene 30
o
dj.Q ethylbeizene 30
branochloranethane 20
1,4-dichlorofautane 20
l-chioro-2-bromopropane 20
-------
TABLE 13
ACID FPACTION
MATRIX EFFECT SQLCTICN
Ccnpound
(1) 2-Chlorophenol
(2) p-Chloro-nv-cresol
(3) 2,4-Qichlorophenol
(4) 2,4-DinethyIphenol
(5) 4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
(6) 2,4-Dinitrophenol
(7) 2-Nitrophenol
(8) 4-Nitrophenol
(9) Pentachlorophenol
(10) Phenol
(11) 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Approx. Cone. Range of SpU
-------
24.
TABLE 14
ACED AND BASE/NEDTBAL
SURECGAIE SFIKE
Canaound Apprax. Cone, in Spike (ppb)
decafluorabiphenyl .50
pentafluorophenbl 100
4-fluoroaniline 100
330-
-------
TABLE 15
BASE/NEUTRAL
MKTKEX EFFECT SPI3E
Conpound
Mixture 1: 1,3-dichlorobenzene
1,2-dichlarobenzene
hexachlorobutadiene
napthalene
acenapthene
fluorene
2,4-dinitrotoluene
hexachlorobenzene
anthracene
diethylphthalate
pyrene
crysene
benzo(a)anthracene
Mixture 2: 1,4-dichlcrobenzene
bis(2-chloroiscpropyl)ether
bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
nitrobenzene
acenapthylene
2,6-dinitrotoluene
4-branophenyl-phenyl ether
diraethylphthalate
di-M-butylphthalate
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
3,3'-dichlorobenzidine
Mixture 3: ben?ndine
benzo(g,h,i) perylene
^nitroscdimethylamine
di-n-octylphthalate
Mixture 4: hexachloroethane
i^riitroso-di-isf-propylainine
1,2,4-trichlorobenzene
hexachlorocyclopentadiene
2-chloronapthylene
j_3cphorcne
1,2-diphenylhydraz±ne
M-nitroscdiphenylaraine
phenanthrene
flucranthene
cur'.• Ibenry 1 phthalate
Approx. Cone. Par.ee of Spike (ppb)
10 - 400
10 - 400
10 - 400
10 - 400
10 - 400
10 - 400
30 - 1200
10 - 400
10 - 400
20 - 800
10 - 400
20 - 800
20 - 800
10 - 400
20 - 800
10 - 400
10 - 400
10 - 400
30 - 1200
20 - 800
10 - 400
10 - 400
10 - 400
40 - 1600
40 - 1500
20 - 800
30 - 1200
20 - 300
10
30
10
20
10
40
20
20
10
10
20
400
1200
400
800
400
1500
800
800
400
400
300
331<
-------
36.
TABLE 16
PESTICIDE FRACTION
MATRIX £i'£'.ti.T SPIKE
Approx. Cone. Range of Spike (pcb)
Mixture 1: a-BEC
g-BHC
d-BHC
Heptachlor
Heptachlor epoxide
a-endosulfan
endrin
p,p'-DDD
Mixture 2: S-BHC
AMrin
p,p'-DDE
8 endosulf an
p,p'-DDT
Mixture 3: Tech grade chlordane
Mixture 4: Toxaphene
Mixture 5: PCS 1254
0.1 - 0.5
0.1 - 0.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
.2
.2
.2
.3
,3
.5
1
1
1
1.5
1.5
2.5
0.6 - 3.0
0.1 - 0.5
0.2 - 1.0
0.4 - 2
0.6 - 30
1 - 5
2 - 10
30 - 150
4 - 20
332<
-------
TABLE 17
METALS FRACTION
MKTBIC EFFECT SPIKE
Compound Approx. Cone. Range of ScLke (ppb)
Flame:* Beryllium 1-10
Cadmium 5-50
Chronium 5-50
Copper 5-50
Nickel 5-50
Silver 5-50
Zinc 5-50
Flameless:* Antimony 1-10
Arsenic 0.5-5
Lead 1-10
Selenium 1-10
Thallium 1-10
Cold Vapor: Mercury 0.2 - 2
*Either flame or flameless method may be used depending on concentraticns
of metals - typical distribution is given.
TABLE 18
CONVENTIONAL FRACTION
MATRIX EFFECT SPIKE
Material Approx. Cor.c. cf Spike (p?b)
or 10 - 100
Phenol 10 - 100
333<
-------
JS.
TABLE 19
POSSIBLE SOURCES OF STANDARDS
Aldrich Chemical Co., Milwaukee, Wise..
Analabs, Inc., North. Haven, Conn.
J.T. Baker Chemical Co., Phillipsburgh, N. J.
Chemical Procurement Laboratories, College Point, N.Y.
Columbia Organics Catalog A-*7, Columbia, S.C.
Eastman Kodak Co., Rochester, N.Y.
K&K Rare s Fine Chemicals, Plainview, N.Y.
Nanogens International, P.O. Box 487, Freedom, CA 95019
"analytical Reference Standards and. Supplemental Data for Pesticides and
Other Selected Organic Compounds," EPA-660/9-76H312 (May 1976'), Health Effects
Research Laboratory, Environmental Toxicology Division, Research Triangle Park,
N.C.
R.K. Chemical Co., 2135 Howard Street, Hartville, OH 44632
Tridom Chemical Inc., Hauttauge, N.T..
PCR Research Chemicals, Inc., Gainesville, Fla.
Supelco, Inc., Belief onte, PA.
Chem Service, West Chester, PA..
PolyscienCe, Warrenton, PA.
applied. Science Laboratories, State College, PA.
NOTEr These sources are not to be interpreted as being endorsed by the EPA.
334<
-------
19.
C. 3egicn '7H Stock Solution Supply Program
Summary
The contractor shall run one duplicate (same sample run twice), one
reagent blank (laboratory prepared distilled/deionized water), one
method standard (standard added to distilled/deionized water), and one
matrix effect spike (standard added to sample) for each batch of samples
collected at a given city. A field reagent blank will also be collected
and should be treated as a regular sample. Therefore, the laboratory
should receive 15 samples from the field for each city. Twelve of these
will be regular samples, one will be a field blank, one will be a duplicate
sample for the duplicate analyses and the remaining sample will be a
duplicate for the matrix effect spike.
Region VII will supply two types of quality control solutions to each
contractor- The first type of solution is called a surrogate stock
solution. These stock solutions contain non priority pollutant compounds
and are used to detect gross problems in sample work-up. The second
type of solution is called a standard stock solution. These solutions
contain most of the priority pollutantsand are used to estimate the
reliability of reported data. The quality control solutions provided will
be as follows:
Surrogate Solutions Standard Stock Solution
Volatiles 2 Volatiles 5
Extractables 1 Base Neutral 4
(acids, base & neutral) Acid 1
Pesticide 5
Metals 1
TOTAL 4 .TOTAL 16
Each day samples are started, the contractor should transfer an aliquote
(specific volume will be supplied with solution) from each surrogate
stock solution to a volumetric and dilute to volume. An aliquote of
this surrogate working solution is then added to each sample Just prior
to analyses.
The volatile standard additons are prepared by combining the 5 volatile
stocks, into one volumetric, diluting to volume, and spiking the resulting
solution into the blank water or into a sample. The 4 base/neutral stocks
and the 1 acid stock are combined in a similar manner. Of the 5 cesticide
stocks only 1 is used for spiking purposes at any one time. These should
be rotated so that all the pesticides eventually are included in the
quality assurance program. 'One metal solution will be provided which will
be adcec directly, without prior dilution, to the sample or blank water.
These procedures are explained in more details in the following^:a?es.
Please refer any questions to Dr. Robert Kleopfer (815-274-42S5).
-------
40.
INSTRUCTIONS FOK USE OF REGION VII SPIKING SOLUTIONS
Region VII has provided standard spiking solutions and surrogate spiking
solutions. These are to be used according to the following instructions
per each analytical group and the results are to be reported on the
attached quality assurance report sheet (one sheet per compound). Each
set of samples processed should include one method blank, one method
standard at one spiking level (spiked blank water - wait one hour),
and one matrix effect spike at one level (spiked sample - wait one hour),
and one field, duplicate. All samples are to be spiked with surrogate
solutions as instructed.
In order to eliminate errors caused by inconsistencies in true spiking
solution concentrations, we suggest that the Spiking solutions also be
used as. quantitation standards in determination of recovery values.
Ttiis can be done readily by preparing a reference standard at the same time
that a sample is spiked. For example, if 0.2ml of a spiking solution
is dosed into 1 liter of water sample, extracted and then concentrated
to 1 ml, then that same spiking solution should be used as the standard
by taking 0.2ntT and adjusting to 1 ml in volume.
336<
-------
Preparation of Base/Neutral Spiking Solutions for Matrix Effect
and Method Standard
I. General Comments
A. The contractor is provided with four 8/N mixes. The spikina
solution is prepared by mixing equal volumes of each of the four mixes
together.
B. Spiking levels for the B/N compounds are .2, .4, .6, 1, 2,
4, and 3 mis of the spiking solution.
II. B/N Mix I
A. Stock Solution
1. Mix I was made up in 10* benzene in methylene chloride.
2. Concentrations of components in stock:
Comoound Concentration
1,3 dichlorobenzene 200 ug/ml
1,2 dichlorobenzene 200 yg/ml
hexachlorobutadiene 200 yg/ml
napthalene 200 yg/ml
acenapthene 200 yg/ml
fluorene 200 yg/ml
2,4 dinitrotoluene 600 yg/ml
hexachlorobenzene 200 yg/ml
anthracene 200 yg/ml
diethylphthalate 400 yg/ml
pyrene 200 yg/ml
chrysene ' 400 yg/ml
benzo(a)anthracene 400 yg/ml
B. Spiking Solution
1. After diluting Mix I with equal volumes of the other
three compounds, the concentrations will then be 1/4 of the values just
reported.
III. B/N Mix II
A. Stock Solution
1. Mix II was made up in 101 benzene in methylene chloride.
2. Concentration of components in stock?"
337<
-------
42.
Compound Concentration,
1 ,4 dichlorobenzene 200
bis (2 chloroisopropyl) ether 400
bis (2-chloroethyl) ether 200 v9/ml
nitrobenzene 200 yg/ml
acenapthylene 200 yg/ml
2,6 dinitrotoluene 500 yg/ml
4-bromophenyl -phenyl ether 400 yg/ml
dime thylphthal ate 200 yg/ml
di-N-butylphthalate 200 yg/ml
bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 200 yg/ml
3,3'dichlorobenridine 800
B. Spiking Solution
1.. All above concentrations will be quartered after spiking
solution is made up.
IV. B/N Mix III
A. Stock Solution
1. Mix III is made up in 10% benzene in methylene chlorids
2. Concentrations of components in stock!
Compounds Concentration
benzidine 800 ug/ml
benzo(g,h,i) perylene 400 yg/ml
N-nitrosodimethylamine 600 yg/ml
di-n-octylphthalate 400. yg/ral
B. Spiking Solution
K After diluting Mix M with equal volumes of the other
three mixes, the above concentrations will be quartered.
V. B/N Mix IV
A. Stock Solution
1.. Mix IV is made up in 102 benzene in methyl ene chloride.
2.V Concentrations of components in stock?
Compounds Concentration
hexachloroethane 200 yg/ml
H-nitroso-di-N-propylamine 600 yg/ml
1 ,2,4-trichlorobenzene 200 yg/ml
hexachlorocyclopentadiene 400 ug/ml
33S<
-------
Compounds Concentration
2-chloronapthylene - 200 uq/mT
isophorone 800 */ml
1,2 diphenylhydrazine 400 y|/ml
N-nitrosodiphenylamine 400 J/ml
phenanthrene 200 ug/ml
fluoranthene
butyl benzyl phthal ate
3. Spiking Solution
1. The above concentrations will be quartered.
339<
-------
44.
Preparation of Pesticide Spiking Solutions for Matrix Effect Spike
and Method Standard
I. General Comments
A. There are five pesticide stock solutions. When the spike
solutions are made up from these stocks, only one of the solutions
is spiked at a time. Otherwise pesticide peaks will overlap on a GC
run. So when a certain pesticide is suspected to be present in an
unknown, spike with the-mi* containing that pesticide.
B. All spiking levels for the pesticides are the same. 1, 2,
3, 4, or 5 mis of spiking solution should be pipetted into 1 liter
of sample (matrix effect spike) or. into 1 liter of organic free deion-
ized water (method standard).
II. Pesticide Mix I
A- Stock Solution
1. The contractor is provided with a 100X concentrated stock
solution. This stock solution is made up in hexane.
B. Spiking Solution
1. Preparation
-a. Make a 1/100 dilution on the stock solution into
either hexane or iso-octane. Be sure all solvents used are pesticide
quality.
2. Concentrations of compounds present in 1/100 dilution:
Compound Concentration
a-BHC TOO pg/ul
g-BHC TOO pg/ul
d-BHC 200 pg/ul
Heptachlor 200 pg/yl
Heptachlor epoxide 200 pg/uT
a-endosulfan 300 pg/ul
dieldrin 300 pg/ul
endrin 500 pg/ul
p,p' ODD 600 pg/ul
III. Pesticide Mix II
A. Stock Solution
1. Stock solution provided is 100X as concentrated as the
spiking solution to be used, and-is in hexane.
B. Spiking Solution
1. Preparation
340<
-------
45.
a. Make a 1/100 dilution of the stock provided into
either hexane or iso-octane. Be sure to use pesticide grade solvents,
2. Concentrations 'of compounds in spiking solution:
Compound Concentration
S-3HC TOO pg/ul
Aldrin 200 pg/ul
p.p1 DDE 400 pg/ul
3 endosulfan 600 pg/ul
p.p1 DDT 1 ng/ul
IV. Pesticide Mix III
A. Stock Solution
1. Stock solution provided to contractors is 10X as concen-
trated as spiking solution to be used.
B. Spiking Solution
1. Preparation
a. Make a 1/10 dilution of stock solution into hexane
or iso-octane.
2. Concentration in mix after 1/10 dilution:
Mixture Concentration
tech. grade chlordane- 2 n
V. Pesticide Mix IV
A. Stock Solution
1. Stock solution provided is 10X as concentrated as spiking
solution to be used and is in hexane.
B. Spiking Solution
1. Preparation
a. Make a 1/10 dilution of stock solution provided into
either hexane or iso-octane (pesticide, grade quality).
2. Concentration in spiking solution:
Mixture Concentration
toxaphene- 30 ng/ul
VI. Pesticide Mix V
A. Stock Solution
1. Contractors are provided with a 10X concentrated solution
in hexane.
-------
46.
B. Spiking Solution
1. Preparation
a. Make a 1/10 dilution of stock solution provided into
either hexane-or iso-octane (pesticide grade quality).
2. Concentration in spiking solution:
Mixture Concentration
PCS-1254 4 ng/ul
342-
-------
4".
8
Base/Neutral - Acid Surrogate Spiking Solution
I. Stock
A. The surrogate stock solution provided to the contractor contains
decafluorobiphenyl, pentafluorophenol, and 4-fluoroanil ine. It is made
up in 105 benzene in methylene chloride.
B. Concentrations of compounds in stock.
Comoound Concentration
decafluorobiphenyl .5 mg/ml
pentafluorophenol 1 mg/ml
4-fIuoroanil ine 1 mg/ml
II. Spiking Levels
A. The stock solution provided is also the spiking solution.
B. TOO ye of this stock or spiking solution is spiked into every
sample including quality control samples.
343<
-------
48.
Preparation of Acid Solution for Matrix Effect Spike
and Method Standard
I. Acid Mix
A. Stock
1. There is only one acid stock and it is in methylene chloride
2. The stock solution is 1QX as concentrated as the spiking
solution to be used.
B.' Spiking Solution
T. Preparation
a. Make a T/10 dilution of the stock in methylene chloride
2. Spiking Levels
a. 2, 4, 6, or 8 mis of the spiking solution is spiked
into 1 liter of sample (matrix effect spike) or 1 liter of organic free
D.I. H2Q (method spike).
3. Concentration of components in spiking solution.
Compound
2-nitrophenol
2-chlorophenol
2,4- dimethyl phenol
phenol
2,4,6 trichlorophenol
2,4 dichlorophenol
p-chloro-fl-cresol
pentachlorophenol
2,4 dinitrophenol
4-nitrophenol
4,5 dinitro-o-cresol
Concentration
20 yg/ml
10 yg/ml
15 jig/ml
10 vg/ml
17 yg/ml
12 yg/ml
18 yg/ml
55 yg/ml
800 yg/ml
250 vg/ml
450 yg/ml
344<
-------
10
Preparation of Surrogate Spike Solutions
to be Used for Volatile Organics
A. Reagents
1 . Dg benzene
2. D« toluene
3. "Dfo ethyl benzene
4. Supelco Mix - Catalog #4-8823 contains 20mg/m1 each in 1 mi
MeOH, contains broraothlorome thane , 1.4 dichlor-obutane and l-chloro-2-
bromopropene.
5. Reagent grade methanol
6. Organic free water
B. Apparatus
1. Volumetric flasks, clean and baked out at 180°C and cooled,
lOral and 25ml in size.
2. Hamilton syringe - gas tight, lOOul size.
C. Preparation of Deuterated Stock Solution
1. Into a clean 25ral volumetric flask carefully add about lEml
MeOH.
2. Add lOOul DS benzene.
3. Add IQOyl Dg toluene.
4. Add TOOul DIQ ethyl benzene.
5. Dilute to volume with MeOH.
6. Stopper, mix well, store in a protected atmosphere in a refrig-
erator.
Approximate concentrations of deuterated stock solutions:
Dg benzene » 3515 ppm
Dg toluene = 3468 ppm
ethyl benzene * 3469 ppra
D. Preparation of Working Surrogate Spike Solution
1. Into^ 10ml volumetric flask that contains 10ml organic free
water, -add 80yl deuterated stock solution.
2. Add lOyl Supelco surrogate spike solution.
3. Mix by inverting three times.
4. Add 5ul of surrogate spike solution to each '5ml sample being
analyzed by purge and trap followed by GC/MS.
5. Record total ion content for each spike and monitor spikes
throughout the day.
Concentration of spikes are approximate.
Dg benzene = 28 ppb
DS toluene = 28 ppb
D]o ethyl benzene =• 23 ppb
bromochloromethane = 20 ppb
1 .i dichlorobutane = 20 ppb
1 -cnl oro-2-bromopropene = 20 ppb
345<
-------
30.
11
Preparation of Volatile Organic Standards
Due to the nature (volatile organic compounds) and the number (31),
the standard reference mix for volatile organics is prepared by u'sing
the Supelco purgable mixes as stock solutions.
Stock Solutions:
A. Purgable A, catalog #4-8815, each constituent at 0.2 mg/ml
in methanol. From Supelco. Contains the following: Methyl ens chloride,
trichloroethylene, 1,1,-dichloroethylene, 1,1-dichlcroethane , 1,1,2-
trichloroethane, dibromochloromethane, 'chloroform, tetrachloroethylene,
carbon tetrachloride, chlorobenzene, 1,2-dichloropropQfe.
B. Purgable B, catalog. #4-8816, each constituent at 0.2 mg/ml
in methanol. Obtained from Supelco. Contains the following: Trichloro-
fluoromethane, cis-1,3-dichloroprop.ene, benzene, trans-1,2-dichloro-
ethylene, 1,2-dichloroethane, bromodichloromethane, toluene, trans-1,3-
dichloropropene, ethyl benzene.
C. Purgable C, catalog #4-8817, each constituent at 0.2 mg/ml
in methanol. Obtained from Supelco. Contains the following: Chloro-
methane, dichlorodifluoromethane, bromomethane, vinyl chloride, chloro-
ethane.
D. Acrolein stock, accurately weigh about SOOmg into a 100ml
volumetric flask which contains about 75ml MeOH. Dilute to volume
with methanol (cone. 6.O&.mg/ml-supplied).
E. AeryIonitrtle stock, accurately weigh about 1.6g into a 100ml
volumetric flask which contains about 75ml MeOH. Dilute to volume with
methanol (cone. 11.181 mg/ml supplied).
F. 2-Chi oroe thy! vinyl ether stock, "Iccura-tely weigh about lOOmg
into a 10ml volumetric flask containing MeOH. Dilute to volume with
methanol (conc» 11.6 mg/ml supplied).
Working Standard
Into a 2ml screw cap vial, which has been baked out at 180°C for one hour
and allowed to cool, add:
1. lOOul MeOH
2. 200yl Purgable A
3. 200yl MeOH
4. 200WT Purgable 3
5. 200U1 MeOH
6. SOOyl Purgable C
7- lOOyl MeOH
8. 20U1 Acrylonitrile stock
9. lOOyl MeOH
10. SOul Acrolein stock
11. lOOwl MeOH
346<
-------
12
12. lOyl 2-chloroethylvinyl ether stock
13. 90ul HeOH
Quickly add each. Do not let needle of syringe below the surface of "he
solvent. Touch sides of vial for draining. Label carefully. Stopper
tightly. Store in freszer under activated charcoal. Amounts may be halved
depending on need. Prepare workfng standard monthly.
5yl or working standard is spiked into Sral deionized water which is
then analyzed by purge and trap and GC/MS. This (5ul) represents a
spike having the following composition:
Compound Amount (ug/1 in gob)
Purgable A group 20
Punjabi e B group 20
Purgable C 60
Acrolein 243
Acrolynitrile 112
2-chloroethylvinyl ether 58
34'
-------
52.
T7 PESFOHfflNCE CKETSKIA
A. Introduction
The data generated for each fraction was compared at an EGD meetina
in Norfolk, Va. The data represent 10,000 points and were primarily qeneratsd
by the following laboratories:
1. AOL Inc., Cambridge, Ma.
2. Carborundum Co., Sacramento, Ca.
3. EPA-Begion VH, Kansas City, Kansas
4. Versar Inc., Springfield,- Va.
Smaller amounts of data were developed at three other laboratories
for a total of seven participants. The samples that were spiked with matrix
effect and surrogates range from, ground water to PCTW effluents and timber
and paper product waste.
The data can be used, to develop a set of control limits, both Upper
Control Limits (DCL) and Lower Control Limits (LCL) for priority pollutant
analysis. Sufficient data is presented to' evaluate both the operation of the
laboratory via method spikes and blanks and the impact of a particular matrix
via the duplicate spikes. The base data generated represent vastly varying
conditions and matrices and is quite useful. Most control limits would be
expected to decrease, i.e., improve, as methods are improved and laboratory
experience is gained.
B. Summary, of Control Limits for Matrix Effect Spikes
The data, and tables are directly from the Region VII presentation
and are to be used as control limit guides.
UCL = 2 Sp
LCL = 3 Sp
For example, consider the method spike for benzene (data fron Table 21).
348<
-------
In the Method Standard In the Matrix Spike
89 12 93 24
UCL 89 +• 3(12) =125 93 4- 3(24) = 165
LCL 89 - 3 (12) - 53 93 .- 3 (24) = 21
Therefore, within a given set of samples and control solutions, a recovery for
benzene in the method standard between 53% - 125% or in the matrix spike between
21% - 165% is said to be in control. Any data outside these limits need careful
examination and probable re-analysis. The Tables 20 through 25 give all data
relevant to matrix spike recovery.
C. Summary of Control Limits for Surrogate Spikes
The priority pollutant surrogates are presented in Table 26. The
data base upon which to make decisions is much smaller here than for the ra-crix
effect spike. In practice, the data generated by surrogates gives the analyst
a real-time instantaneous look at the operation of the overall analytical
systan in every sample. This instantaneous information is the most important
reason for the retention of the surrogates.
For the longer term record, the upper and lower control., limits are
calculated in the same way as for matrix effect spikes.
349<
-------
54.
TABLE 20. INTRALABORATORY COMPARISON
Priority
Pollutant
Fraction*5
Volatile
(MS)
Volatile
Sample Spike
Acid (MS)
Acid Sample
Blank
B/N-(MS)
B/N Sample
Spike
Pesticide
(MS)
Pesticide
Sample Spike
Metals (MS)
Metals
Sample Spike
Cyanide (MS)
Cyanide
Sample Spike
Phenol ics
(MS)
Phenol ics
Sample Spike
LAB
1
88+21
82+24
90 V]8
92+34
95+25
84+18
73+8
69+7
113+37
100+20
103+14
101+12
10+13"
93+15
LAS LAB
II III
95+5
101+9 .93+.! 3
89+5
72+10 62+1 Z
78+41
61+22 55+24
74+19
51+18 33+10
-
103+14
-
-
97+6
98+10
LAB LAB LAB
IV V VII
100+8 -
107+_9 -
57+.14 82+16 -
60+15 84+; 7 -
77+J 5 -
68+.16 - 63+J3
88+8
93+.S
103+8 -
92+7
103+8 -
93+J6 -
100+_7 -
97+_9
Averag
90+_13
92+_15
84+13
76+19
84+_25
68+_21
78+11
59+11
108+22
96+Jl
103+7
96+14
101+_8
96+_11
a) The values are in units of percent recovery (P) plus or minus (+J one
standard deviations (Sp).
b) MS refers to the method standard or the standard addition to blank water.
Sample spike refers to the standard addition to a sample.
c) P and Sp are weighted averages based on the number of data points
contributed by each laboratory.
35CK
-------
TABLE 21. PURGEA3LE ORGANICS
Comoound
Acrolein
Acrylonitrile
Benzene
Bromodi ch1oromethane
Bromofonn
Bromomethane
Carbon Tetrachlorfde
Chlorobenzene
Chlorodibromomethane
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chioromethane
Oichlorodifluoromethane
1,1-Oichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethylene
trans-1,2-Oichloroethylene
Dichloromethane
1 ,2-Oichloropropane
cis-1,3-Oichloropropene-
trans -1-3-Di'chloropropene
Ethyl benzene
Method13
Standard
774-30
96+.31
89+12
9 7 +11
94^14
90+16
91+23
94+23
86+12
67+JZ2
90+18
91+.22
108+11*
83^10
102^12
74+_24
90+25
82+46
94+_26
95+15
91+_13
109+19
Standard0
Spike
32*30
1 02+_28
93+_24
103+_31
88+12
78+15
91+_33
103+24
99+17
60+_23
91+26
64+_28
1144-8*
87+_21
103+27
80+32
85+35
66+66
99*30
98+20
93-16
106-28
351<
-------
56.
Continuation of Table 21
Method Sample
Compound Standard Spike
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 31+31 73+31
Tetrachloroethylene 97^13 99+25
Toluene 96+22 97+_25
1 ,.1,1 -Tri chl oroethane 92^21 94+_36
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 102_+14 103±19
Tri chloroethyl en* 106+14 110+22
Trichlorofluoromethane 59+23 67+_48
Vinyl Chloride 103+30 79+22
a) The values are in terms of P _+ Sp. Data from 2-4 laboratories have been
averaged except where noted with an (*) asterik. In general the concentration
added ranged from 10 to 1000 parts per billion.
b) Standard addition to blank water.
c) Standard addition to sample.
*0ata from only one lab were available.
-------
TABLE 22. ACID FRACTION3
COMPOUND
2-Chlorophenol
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
4,6-Oinitro-o_-cresol
2,4-Oinitrophenol
2-Nitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
Pentachlorphenol
Phenol
2,4,6-Trichlorphneol
METHOD13
STANDARD
80+_22
96*16
86+24
7U19
87+34
89+22
95+22
65+33
87+24
61+J1
91+22
SAMPLED
SPIKE
71+23
99*19
84^23
72+.16
102*23
92*_40
87+22
59+46
84*_22
54^24
30*24
a) The values are in terms of P _+ Sp. Data from 2-5 laboratories have
been averaged. In general the concentation added ranged from 20 to 2500
parts per bil1 ion.
b) Standard addition to blank water.
c) Standard addition to sample.
353<
-------
58.
TABLE 23. BASE/NEUTRAL FRACTION3-
Compound
Acenaphthene
Acanapthylene
Anthracened
Benzidine
Benzo(a)anthracenee
Benzo(b)fluoranthene^
Berizo(lc}fluoranthene^
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
Bis(2-chloroethyl) Ether
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) Ether
Bis(2-ethy1hexyl) PtithaUte
4-8romophenyl Phenyl Ether
2-Chioronaphthalene
Chrysene8
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Di-n-butyl Phthalate
1,2-Oichlorobenzene
1,3-Oichlorobenzene
1,4-Oichlorobenzane
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
Method0
Standard
90+22
83+.2Z
98+20
44+27
105+33
96+68*
96+68
90+.22
49+39
98+48
15^136
70+33
80+25
88+20
105+33
80+42
80+32
65+24
67+_21
67+_22
71+85
Sampl ec
Spike
78+24
79+27
79+25
40+29
51+24
41+_21
47+27
43+21
49+22
30+_49
96+88
66+50
63+_25
79+21
77+_27'
36+_29
58+27
65+_27
62+_20
53+21
62+45
354<
-------
Continuation of Table 23
Compound
Diethyl Phthalate
Dimethyl Phthalate
2,4-Oi nitrotoluene
2,6-Oinitrotoluene
Di-n-octyl Phthalata
1,2-Oiphenylhydrazine
(and/or Azobenzene)
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Hexachloroethane
Isophorone
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
N-nitrosodipheylamine
(and/or Diphenylamine)
N-N i trosodi -_n_-propyl ami ne
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Method0
Standard
71^37
43+_37
122+_55
115+41
84+_44
9.7+26
111+26
98+24
98+31
76+26
38+28
63+22
66+36
109+14
83+_24
106+_31
72+22
Samplec
S D i k e
65+37
66*43
94*_45
104*_35
38*32
91*_32
63+20
38+25
76+31
77*_45
27+_10
53+23
67^22
40+21
89*51
77^51
66+25
86+34
98+_20
142+_41
74+22
71^22
7920
59*24
a) The values are in terms of P + Sp. Data from 2-5 laboratories have been
averaged except where noted with an (*) asterik. In general the concentration
added ranged from 10 to 500 parts per billion.
b) Standard addition to blank water.
c) Standard addition to sample.
d.e,f) These isomers pairs are not separted by packed column GC. Also m^-ss
data are not sufficiently unique to allow differentiation, "
•Data from only one lap were available-
-------
50.
TABLE 24.. PESTICIDE FRACTION*
Compound
Aldrin
atpha-BHC
beta-BHC
gamma-BHC
deltaTBHC
Chlordane
4,4' -ODD
4,4' -ODE
4, 4 '-DDT
Dieldrin
Endosulfan I
Endosulfart II
Endosulfane Sulfate
Endrfn
Endrfn Aldehyde
Heptachlor
HeptachTor Epoxide
PCS
Toxapnene
Methodb
Standard
72+13
78+13.
79+21
78+; 4
82+J6
81+17*
82+; 4
76+14
85+17
71+14
65+14
67+19
74+^39*
82+25
64+76*
72+12
82+14
83 +11*
89+12*
Samplec
Spike
55+12
55+12
57+22
64+_1 1
61+16
39+_9*
62+; 6
57±1 8
76+26
62+16
61+13
66+14
84+_30*
68+18
34+_39*
49+12
65+11
42+13
-
a) The values are irt terms of P +_ Sp. Data from 2-4 laboratories have been
averaged except where noted with- an (*)asterik. In general the concentration
added ranged from. 0.1 to 100 parts per billion.
b) Standard addition to blank water.
c) Standard addition to sample.
*0ata from only one lab were available.
356<
-------
51.
PARAMETER
TABLE 25. METALS, CYANIDE, AND PHENOLICSa
Antimony
Ars.enic
Beryllium
Cadm'i urn
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Mercury^
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Tn a-11 i urn
Zinc
Cyanide
Total Phenols
METHOD^
STANDARD
61+47*
1 20+20
89+16
91+J8
99+30
136j+70
116+32
83+24
84+62
112+15
1 10+25
99+_33*
122+44
101+8
SAMPLEC
SPIKE
103+_24
97+25
94+_20
98+_23
106+25
99+24
93+_25
79+38
101+_26
93+_20
80+_25
95+23
106+^37
96+H
96+ II
a) The values are in terms of P _+ Sp. Data from 2-3 laboratories have been
averaged exept where noted with an (*) asterik. In genral the concentration
added ranged from 10 to 1000 parts per billion.
b) Standard addition to blank water.
c) Standard addition to sample.
d) Analyzed by the cold vapor technique.
*0ata from only one lab were available.
357<
-------
62.
TABLE 26. PRIORITY POLLUTANT SURROGATES3
Compound LAB Illb
(Purgeable Orgnaics)
dg-Benzene
Bronochloromethane
d-Chloroform 139+_96
1,4-Dichlorobutane
d^-l,2-Oichloroethane 119.+29
dj-Oichloromethane 146+55
dig-£thylbenzene 102+25
f\ uorbenzene 96+20
dg-Toluene
d3-l,l,l-Tn'chloroethane 117^41
(Acids).
2-Fluorphenol 76+36
Pentafluorphenol 84+J30
d5-Phenol 55+20
Trifluoro-in-cresol 72+_42
(Base/Neutral)
Decaf 1 uorobi phenyl 39+_l 8
da-Nepthalene 76+22
2-fluornaphthelene 75+20
1-fTuronaphthelene 69+18
di2-benzo(a) anthracene 68+_16
2-flurobi phenyl 63+_5
ne 57+_36
358<
LAB
93+22
91+20
85+24
LAS VIII
94+18
92+18
50+22
101+39
41 + 29
46+13
-------
Continuation of Table 26
53.
Compound
LAB IIIb
LAS IV<=
LAB VI1
2-fluroaniline 74^39
dg-nitrobenzene 7(3+21
a) The values are in terms of P _* Sp. The concentration added ranged from
20 to 200 parts per billion.
b) The matrix for these surrogates included influent and effluent samples
from 12 different industrial categories.
c) The matrix for these surrogates included POTW, detergent, and chemical
disposal industries.
d) The matrix for these surrogates included POTW samples only.
353<
-------
SECTION IV
360<
-------
PRIORITY POLLUTANT METHODOLOGY
QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW
Robert D. Kleopfer*
Jerry R. Dias and
Billy J. Fairless
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Region VII Laboratory
25 Funston Road
Kansas City, Kansas 66115
361<
-------
c- ABSTRACT
t
e
Initial quality assurance statistics are presented for the priority
pollutants, the statistics are based on over 10,000 data points
contributed by seven laboratories. The average recovery of all the
organic prioirty pollutants from industrial effluents is 73 per cent
with a standard deviation of 26 per cent. Data are summarized for
metals* cyanides, phenolics, and the specific organic compounds which
are divided into four fractions. Recommended control limits are given
along with a summary of data for surrogate recoveries. The results
have permitted identification of the variables associated with EPA's
analytical protocol.
-------
INTRODUCTION
In compliance with a consent decree emanating from civil court actions
brought against the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) by concerned
organizations, EPA has developed a list of 129 priority pollutants with
the goal of establishing industrial effluent limitations and guidelines.*
This paper will summarize the results of over 10,000 measurements collected
/
by seven laboratories on 104 of the 1U organic priority pollutants, all
the metals (13), and total phenol and cyanide. (Actually there are 130
priority pollutants if one differentiated 1,3-dichloropropene into cis
and trans isomers.) The seven different ArocVors are reported collectively
as PCB's while three base/neutral compounds, two volatile orgnaic compounds,
and asbestos are not included in this report. The data assembled herein
has permitted identification of probable problem areas and provides an initial
*"' estimate of the accuracy and precision of the EPA analytical methodology^ for
the priority pollutants.
363<
-------
r
Analytical Methodology
The screening of wastewater for 114 organics is accomplished by analyses
of five different fractions.2 The fractions are pesticides (26 compounds),
base/neutrals (46 compounds), acids (11 phenols), purgeables (29 volatile
organics), and direct aqueous injection fraction (2 compounds).
The base/neutrals (B/N) include compounds such as 1,4-dichlorobenzene,
benzidine, and benzo(a)pyrene. These compounds are extracted from basic
aqueous solution with methylene chloride. The concentrated extracts, are
analyzed by GC/MS on a 1J SP-2250 column. Columns packed with 3% OV-17
and 3J SP-2250-DB have also been used effectively.
The acid fraction (A) consists of 11 phenols ranging from phenol itself
to pentachlorophenol. These are determined by extraction of acidic solution
with methylene chloride and analysis by GC/MS techniques. The preferred
column packing for this analysis is 1% SP-1240-DA.
The pesticide fraction (P) is prepared by extraction with 15% methylene
chloride in hexane. The pesticides are initially screened by gas chroma-
tography with electron capture detection.3 Any compounds which are tentatively
identified by that technique must be confirmed by GC/MS.
The purgeable organics, which include compounds ranging in volatility
from methyl chloride to ethyl benzene, are measured using a purge and
trap analytical technique. In this method, the volatile organics are swept
-------
from 5ml of sample with an Inert gas. The purged organlcs are retained
on a trap consisting of Tenax GC and Silica Gel. These organics are then
heat desorbed onto an analytical column consisting of 0.25 Carbowax 1500
on Carbopak C with a 3% Carbowax 1500 precolumn. Again, mass spectrometry
is used for the detection.
Finally, because of their high water solubility, acrolein and acrylonitrile
are determined by direct aqueous injection on Chromosorb 101 with mass
spectrometric detection. However, more recent work has shown that these
/
compounds can also be measured by the purge and trap technique.*
Identification is based on the appearance of mass chromatograms (extracted
ion current profiles) for three characteristic ions for each compounds.
As an example, for the three dichlorobenzene isomers, the molecular
ions at 146 and 148 and the fragment ion at 113 are used for identification
and quantification. The ions must appear at the correct retention time
with the correct relative responses in order to be considered a positive
identification. Quantisation is based on external standard methods for
the volatile organics and pesticide fractions and internal standard methods
for the base/neutral and acid fractions. The internal standard for these
fractions is fully deuterated anthracene which has a molecular ion occurring
at mass 188.
The metals are analyzed by flame!ess atomic absorption (AA) and cyanide
and total phenols are colorimetrically determined.5 Cyanide is measured
-------
f-~- colorimetrically by converting to cyanogen chloride with chloramine-T
which reacts with pyridine to give a product that forms a colored
complex with barbituric acid. Total phenol is colorimetrically determined
\
by oxidizing with potassium ferricyanide to give quinones that condense
with 4-aminoantipyn'ne to form colored complexes.
Quality Assurance Requirements
The original priority pollutant methodology document^ specified several
quality assurance (QA) requirements, but additional features were sub-
sequently added^t?. These requirements include the following:
1. Method Blank
The method blank is defined as an appropriate volume of "organic-free"
water which has been processed exactly as a sample (same glassware,
(£
^^ reagents, solvents, etc.). For the extractable parameters (B/N, A, P)
this would require extraction of one liter of water. For the volatile -
fraction, 5ml of "organic-free" water should be analyzed by the purge
and trap methodology. One method blank sample should be run with every
batch of 20 or fewer samples. Also, a method blank should be run whenever
a new source of reagent or solvent is introduced into the analytical scheme.
Reagents having background levels that interfer with the compounds to be
determined must be purified, and shown to be acceptable or replaced with
some that are acceptable.
-------
r
£" 2. Field Blank
It 1s the responsibility of the sampling team to provide the appropriate
field blanks to the analytical team. For the extractable parameters (B/N,
A, P) the minimum requirement 1s to provide an appropriate volume of blank
water which has been processed through the sampling equipment in the same
manner as a sample. The field blank is then analyzed in the laboratory '
as 1f 1t were a sample. When inteferences occur, the analytical results
must be discarded or flagged so as not to result in the reporting of false
positives. Field blanks for the volatiles consists of "organic-free" water
t
which has been sent from the laboratory to the sampling site and retained
with the samples. The purpose is to check on possible contamination of
the sample by permeation of volatiles through the septum seal. Sample
blanks should be protected with activated carbon during transit and during
storage in the laboratory.
3. Replicates
To determine the precision of the method, a regular program of analyses
of replicate aliquots of environmental samples must be carried out. At
least two replicate aliquots of a well mixed samples must be analyzed with
each set of 20 samples or less analyzed at a given time. For those parameters
where a sufficient number of positive results are accumulated over a period
of time, precision criteria should be developed. A minimum of 15
*
replicates at a particular concentration or concentration range where linearity
exists is required to start an on-going program for QA and subsequent estimates
367<:
-------
r
of precision.
4. Standard Additions to Samples
These are additions of known amounts of authentic standard to the sample.
The samples are then processed and analyzed in the same manner as a sample.
The percent recovery is then determined as described in reference 6. At
least one spiked sample is analyzed along with each set of 20 samples or
less. Spiked data are obtained for each parameter of interest.
5. Standard Addition to Blank Water (Method Standard)
" ' . *
These are additions of known amounts of authentic standards to the water
blank before extraction. The samples are then processed and analyzed in
the same manner as a sample. The standard should be approximately
equal to the concentration found in routine samples. The percent recovery
is determined as described in reference 6. At least one method standard
must be analyzed along with each set of 20 samples or less.
6. Surrogate Spikes
These are standards which are added to every sample prior to analysis.
The standards chosen should be chemically similar to compounds in the
fraction being analyzed. Also, the standards should be compounds which
would not likely be found in environmental samples. The purpose of the
surrogate spike is to provide quality control on every sample by -
*
constantly monitoring for unusual matrix effects, gross sample processing
error, etc. The surrogate spike should not be used as an internal standard
for quantisation purposes.
368<
-------
8
fe
^ 7. GC/MS Calibration Check
For the base/neutral fraction, and add fraction decafluorotriphenyl-
phosphlne (DFTPP) 1s run dally according to EPA procedures. The require-
ment 1s for 50 nanograms of DFTPP to meet relative ion abundance criteria**.
For the volatile fraction pentaflurobromobenzene (PFBB) 1s run daily according
..-..•• >"
to EPA procedures. The requirement is for 100 nanograms of PFBB to meet the
relative ion abundance criteria?. More recently, p-fluorobromobenzene has
been recommended as a replacement for PFBB.9
8. GC Performance Check
For the base/neutral fraction, benzidine is run daily either separately or
as a part of a standard mixture. The requirement is to be able to chroma-
tograph the compound at the 100 nanogram level. For the acid fraction,
fr
^ pentachlorophenol is analyzed daily either separately or as part of a
standard mixture. The requirement is to be able to chromatograph the
compound at the 100 nanogram level while giving an acceptable tailing
factor7-10. For the pesticide fraction, Aldrin is run daily either
separately or as part of a standard mixture. An injection of 100 picograms
should give a recorder response of at least 501 full-scale deflection.
Results and Discussion
The results have been condensed and summarized in eight tables. In order
to maintain readability, information such as the number of data points
contributed by each lab for each parameter and the corresponding concen-
C
-------
tration range have not been Included. Also specific results from each
laboratory for each parameter are hot included. These data are, however,
available from the authors upon request*
Interlaboratory Comparison
All the data in this report was collected before June 1979, while the control-
ling protocol was published in April 1977. There are four primary laboratories
(cf. with acknowledgment) contributing almost 10,000 data points to this re-
view. Some of the data was statistically rejected. In Laboratory I, 3i of
the B/N and metal analytical data was rejected' using the statistical one-sided
test at the 2.5% significance level11. Similary, 0.3S of the data from
Laboratory II was also excluded. A total of 18* of the data from Laboratory
III was rejected for two reasons: 1) the spiking levels were not at least
two times above the background level (especially at low levels) and 2)
application of the one-sided test suggested to a 97.55 confidence that the
data removed were likely outliers.
The data are expressed in terms of percent recovery (P) plus or minus
(+) one standard deviation (Sp) where
Sp
-f £")>,)
, ^=1
'/.
-------
10
Table I summarizes the data for the various classes of priority pollutants.
The inter!aboratory comparison gives the average recovery of only the
compounds analyzed by all the contributing laboratories in the method standard
analysis. Once this comparison set had been determined, then the same set
of compounds was used as the basis for interlaboratory comparison for the .
matrix spike. This precaution minimized data variability between the
laboratories due to properties associated with the individual compounds like
volatility, reactivity, etc. (vide infra). Laboratory III had no method
standard analytical data and had analyzed fewe.r compounds. Note that Sp
in the interlaboratory comparison is the deviation of the recovery means
and not measurement deviation.
PURGEABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS. As part of the process of quality assurance
f& ^_—_——^—_———.^——
Labs I, II, III, and IV analyzed field blanks consisting of organic-free
water that was transported to the analytical laboratory along with the
samples. Invariably, dichloromethane (methylene chloride), the extraction
solvent, was observed in field blanks and laboratory blanks. Typical levels
for laboratory IV were 2 _+ 1 parts per billion. No data are reported for
2-chloroethyl vinyl ether and bis(chloromethyl) ether; the former appears
not to have been available and the latter is an alpha-chloromethyl ether
which is well known to undergo facile hydrolysis. In a ten month stability
study, Radian Corporation found that the initial concentration of both
C 371<
-------
n
these ethers in their methanolic standard was reduced to zero probably from
substitution reactions with methane!12. Also, the concentration of acrolein
was reduced to zero. Note that acrolein can undergo air oxidation, Michael
addition, and dimethyl acetal formation 1n methanol.
Tables I and II summarize the results obtained for the purgeables. The
difference in recoveries between the method standard analysis and matrix
spiked analysis should be indicative of sample matrix effects and in
this case there appears to be slight increase in recovery in going from
the method standard analysis (Interlab Comparison Average = 90_+ 13) to the
matrix Spiked analysis (Interlab Comparison Average = 92 +_ 15).
Volatility is a very important variable in the analysis of the purgeable
organic compounds (VOA). Labs I and III have omitted analysis of many
of the most volatile compounds, including bromomethane, chlormethane,
dichlorodifluoromethane, and vinyl chloride. Inspection of the individual
laboratory data show significant differences in going from the most
volatile group of compounds (bp < 75*C) to the least volatile compounds
(bp > 112eC) for Labs I and III only. Recoveries increase and relative
standard deviations decrease. Using the two-tailed statistical test for
significance of the sample differences between the most volatile group
and the intermediate and least volatile groups, assuming there is,no
difference between the population means from which these samples are drawn
it is established to a greater than 99.9S confidence that the observed
-C 372<
-------
T2
difference for these groups arise from volatility. Lab II cooled their
^ Tenax sorbent trap with liquid COg and Lab IV used a sorbent trap mix
containing Tenax, silica gel, and activated charcoal. In a separate
precision study (method standard analysis) by Lab IV involving five
measurements at each of four different concentration, standard deviations
of 11.2+3.4 and 10.0+2.4 were obtained for the most volatile group (11
compounds or 220 data points) and the intermediate and least volatile 7
groups (17 compounds or 340 data points), respectively. Thus, to a 95X
confidence it appears that even in analytical laboratories where volatility
is mainly under control, the more volatile compounds exhibit greater
<
measurement fluctuation.
Comparison of the recovery data of deuterated purgeable organic surrogates
in Table VII versus the recoveries of the corresponding nondeuterated
^y priority pollutant in Table II gives, respectively, 93_+22 and 93+_24 for
benzene, 139+_96 and 110+21 for chloroform, 146+55 and 88+24 for dichloro-
methane, 94+18 and 106+28 for ethylberizene, 92+18 from 97+25 for toluene,
119+29 and 103+_27 for 1,2-dichloroethane, and 117+41 and 94+36 for 1,1,1-
trichloroethane. The large scatter for the data would suggest that d-
chloroform and d2-dichloromethane are poor choices for surrogates.
PHENOLIC ACIDS
After the B/N compounds have been extracted from the alkaline sample
373<
-------
13
with methylene chloride (Figure 1), the aqueous phase is made acidic with
6H HC1 and again extracted with methylene chloride. This latter methylene
chloride extract is dried by passing through a column of anhydrous sodium
sulfate and the solvent concentrated by distillation in Kuderna-Danish
apparatus. Lab III investigated acid carryover in waste samples from the.-
leather tanning industry which tended to form emulsions and therefore were
extracted continously for 24 hours; they noted a pH change from greater than
11 to 8-9. In a separate study, Lab IV demonstrated that, in
the absence of emulsians, significant carryover of only the weakest acids,
2-4-dimethylphenol (50%) and 4-chloro-3-methylphenol (10%), occurred.
Lab V minimized emulsion problems by dilution of the creosote waste from the
wood preserving industry before commencing to analyze it.
A strong relationship exits between acid volatility and analytical recovery.
In all laboratories contributing to this report, acid recovery was. lower
for the more volatile phenols (bp < 211°C: 2-chlorphenol, phenol, 2,4-.
dichlorophenol, and 2,4-dimethylphenol), than for the less volatile ones
(bp >211°C: 2-nitrophenol, 4-chloro-3-methylphenol, 2,4,6-trichlorophenol,.,
and pentachlorphenol). In general, the relative standard deviation decreased
in going from the most volatile to least volatile group; the p-nitrophenols
were excluded from consideration in the volatility grouping because of their
propensity to thermally undergo /intramolecular oxidation to p-quinones which
may also explain why these phenols chromatograph poorly. Application of the
•c
374<
-------
14
two-tailed statistical test for significance of the overall difference in
recoveries for these two groups of acids results in a greater than 95% con-
fidence that the volatility hypothesis is valid.
Comparison of the recoveries of phenol (Table III, 54+24) and ds-phenol
(Table VII, 55+_20) suggests that ds-phenol is a good choice for a surrogate.
BASE/NEUTRALS COMPOUNDS
The simultaneous analysis of the 46 B/N compounds probably represents the
most difficult task in the analysis of the organic priority pollutants. This
- - - »
report summarizes the analytical results of 43 B/N compounds. No analytical
results for bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane, 4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether, or N-
^
nitrosodimethyl amine are contained in this report. Presumably, 4-chlorophenyl
phenyl ether and bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane are not readily acquired. Absence
of data for N-nitrosodimethylamine probably results because of its poor chromatc
graphic properties (GC gives a low broad peak). Also it is questionable
whether bis (2-chloroethoxy)methane is stable enough in the aqueous environ-
ment, particularly under basic conditions, to be analyzable per the specified
methodology. Dibutyl and bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalates were invariably present
in the method and field blanks analyzed by Labs III and IV. Since the waste
samples from the leather tanning and timber industries were particularly
beset with emulsion problems, some carryover of B/N compounds into the
acid fraction was observed. The most significant carryover occurred in the
a
-------
15
lagoon influent samples taken from the timber industry, and these
samples invariably had a high background of the prioirty pollutant
being analyzed. Analysis for the basic compounds in the acid fraction
would probably be futile since they form hydrochloride salts that would
most likely remain in the aqueous phase even if they were carried into the
acid fraction. If the B/N compounds are separated into reactive and
nonreactive groups, then discernible recovery differences become evident
(Table VIII). The reactive group comprises of the alkyl amines and
chlorides, the phthalate esters, and isophorene (an enone); the nonreactive
group consists of all the other B/N compounds. It is well known that
alkyl amines and chlorides react with each other to produce alkylated
ammonium salts^4- Futhermore, alkyl chlorides can undergo elimination
and substitution reactions, like reaction with hydroxide ion to form alkene
and alcohols (aryl chlorides are inert to mucleophilic substituion and are
placed in the nonreactive group); perchlorocarbons can also form aldehydes,
ketones, and carboxylic acids by reaction with hydroxide ion. Esters are
saponified by base arid isophorone can undergo condensation and Michael
addition reaction14. Thus, greater analytical variability is to be expected
in the B/N reactive group. The data in Table VIII appears to verify this
anticipation since, in general, recovery decreases and relative standard
deviation increases in going from the nonreactive group to the reactive
group. Lab II and Lab IV have noted instability indications associated
376^
-------
16
with the standards for the B/N analysis. Radian Corporation did a ten
month storage stability study of their B/N standard in methylene chloride
and found significant changes in the concentrations of the chloroalkyl
ethers, N-nitrosoam1nes, hexachlorocyclopentadiene. dibenzo(a,h)anthracene,
and benzidine*2. Because of emulsion problems, Lab III used continuous
extractors in the analytical processing of the samples from the leather
tanning and timber industries. As noted earlier the pH was initially
adjusted to above 11, but after 24 hours of extraction the pH dropped to
8-9. Lab III performed analyses on sample matrices from a more complex and
diverse industrial cross section and have the lowest Interlab Comparison
recovery value (55^24) in Table I, .in spite of statistical refinement of
the data. Other problems in the GC/MS screening of the B/N compounds include
coelution of anthracene with phenanthrene, benzo(a)anthracene with chrysene,
and benzo(b)fluoranthrene with benzo(k)fluoranthrene coupled with the inability
to distinguish between these pairs by"mass spectrometry. Thermal decomposition
of 1,2-diphenylhydrazine to azobenzene and N-nitrosodiphenylamine to diphenyl
amine and tetraphenylhydrazine has been documented15.
Comparison of the respective recoveries for dg-naphthalene (76+22) and d£-
nitrobenzene (70+71) 1n Table VII versus naphthalene (89+51) and nitrobenzene
(77+51) in Table IV is favorable.
377
-------
17
PESTICIDES
The GC/EC analysis of the pesticides is the most straight-forward of
the organic priority pollutants^. Since found Chlordane, PCB, and
Toxaphene are indistinguishable due to interferences between the'many
compounds in the spike, that the pesticides are spiked in groups of
compounds known to be separable. Endrin aldehyde has a high standard
deviation in Table V probably because of partial air oxidation to a
carboxylic acid.
HETALS
For the most part, none of the laboratories had difficulty in the metals
analysis above concentration of approximately 25 ppb. The high standard
deviations present in the data of Lab I is no doubt due to the low spiking
level which is close to the detection limit of the method used by the
laboratory. ' In the flameless analysis of zinc, environmental contamination
problems were apparently experienced by Labs I and II. It is also possible
that in the method standard analysis of chromium, copper, and nickel, Lab
I was having contamination problems from copper and stainless steel plumbing.
i
CYANIDE AND TOTAL PHENOLS
Total phenols were colorimetrically determined by Labs II and IV via a
totally automated procedure^. Recovery data for the cyanide and total
phenols are presented in Table VI.
37?
-------
18
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
A summary of the overall recoveries of the priority pollutants is given
in Table I. In every case, except for the purgeable organic compounds,
the overall recovery decreases and the relative standard deviation
increases in going from the method standard to the matrix spiked analysis.
Of the organic priority pollutants, the analysis of the purgeable and acid
organic, compounds results in the highest recoveries with the smallest
of tK<. ^vxfneo\Ae Pfr*jaWt C^povi/rv^s t*4 tt\c dtifmse "•>
matrix effect. The increase in recovery for the phenolic acids in going
from unadulterated water to a matrix aqueous medium may be a salting-out
and salting-in effect, respectively, and needs to be studied. The two
major variables for these groups is volatility and carryover of phenolic
acids into the B/N fraction, the latter arising mainly from emulsion problems
since the data from Lab III suggest that no pka dependence was associated
^»,
with their observed acid carryover. The process of continuous extraction
itself may be responsible for carry over which needs to be experimentally
determined. Volatility can be controlled by close monitoring of the
analytical process. Ascertaining that the pH is greater than 11 and, in
the case of emulsion, performing an additional base wash of the B/N
methylene chloride extract will rectify carryover of the acids into the
B/N fraction. The question concerning the stability of methylene chloride
«
during long term (24 hour) contact with hydroxide solution under emulsion
conditions needs to be investigated.
-------
19
In part, the analysis of the base/neutral and pesticide compounds give-the
lowest recoveries because of their greater propensity to react among each
other or with hydroxide or water^*. Several laboratories have noted that
when the four different B/N methanolic standards are mixed in methylene
chloride that this solution becomes turbid and eventually changes to a
yellow color. Thus, the stability of the priority pollutants, benzidine / '
and 1,2-diphenylhydrazine in contact with methylene chloride needs to be
fully determined. Saponification of the phthalate esters has been observed
during the B/N analysis by several laboratories. Another major variable
in the analysis of the B/N compounds is carryove'r into the acid fraction
in the presence of emulsions; this appears to be particularly acute at high
background concentrations of the B/N component.
The VOA analysis per the EPA protocol has proved to be the most successful.
The acid and pesticide analyses have been moderately successful, and the B/N
analysis has been less successful on samples with severe matrix problems, as
from the leather tanning and timber industries. Nevertheless, the present
methodology is adequate and appears capable of improvement. We can be con-
fident that false positive analyses are considerably less likely than false
negative analyses so that when a priority pollutant is detected in the environ-
ment we know the measured quantity is probably smaller than the true value.
Table IX summarizes problems associated with the current priority pollutant
methodology.
C
380-=
-------
20
Initial recommended performance control limits can be computed by
adding (upper control limits, UCL) or subtracting (lower control limit
LCL) three times the standard deviation from the average percent
recovery values presented 1n Tables I to VI1116. Some of LCL's will no
doubt increase as the analytical methodology improves. Also, one should
note that these control limits are somewhat dependent upon the level of
standard addition, the degree of which has not been fully investigated.
-------
Acknowledgement
The major portion of the data in this summary came from EPA-Region VII
and EPA Quality Assurance Contract Reports from A.D. Little. Inc. Acorn
Park, Cambridge, HA 02140 (EPA contract #68-01-3857) Carborundum Co. 3401
LaGrande Blvd. Sacramento CA 95823 (EPA contract #68-01-4689) and Versar,
INC., 6621 Electronics Dr.-, Springfield, VA 22151 (EPA contract # 68-01-3852).
-------
Literature Cited
1. Environmental Science and Technology, February 1978, p. 154
2. "Sampling and Analysis Procedures for Screening of Industrial
Effluents for Priority Pollutants," US EPA, Environmental Monitoring
and Support Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH 45268, March 1976 (Revised April 1977)
3. Federal Register, 38(125), 17318(1973)
4. "Midwest Research Institute Final Letter Report on Evaluation of Test
Procedure for Acrolein and Acrylonitrile, "MRI Project NO. 4719-A,
US EPA Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory, Cincinnati,
OH 45268, June, 1979.
5. "Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes," US EPA, Enviro-
mental Monitoring and Support Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH 45268, March,
1979.
6. "Procedure for Preliminary Evaluation of Analytical Methods to be
Used in the Verification Phase of the Effluent Guidelines Division BAT
Review," US EPA, Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory,
Cincinnati, OH 45268, March 1978.
7. "Addendum for Sampling and Analysis Procedures for Screening of
Industrial Effluents for Priority Pollutants," US EPA, Environmental
(~~* Monitoring and Support Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH 45268, April, 1979.
8. J.W. Eichelberger, L.E. Harris, and W.L. Budde, Anal. Chem. ,47, 995
9. Federal Register, Volume 44, NO. 233, December 3, 1979. "Guidelines
Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis of Pollutants, Proposed
Regulations".
10. H.M. McNair and E.J. BonelH, "Basic Gas Chromatography." Consolidated
Printing, Berkeley, CA, 1969, p. 52.
11. American Society of Testing and Materials., D2777.
12. Private communications with Dr. L.H. Keith, Radian Corporation., Austin,
Texas.
13. M.R. Spiegel, "Statistics," (Schaum's Outline Series), McGraw-Hill Book
Co., San Francison, CA, 1961, -p. 170.
C
-------
14. R. Morrison and R. Boyd, "Organic Chemistry," 2nd Edition, Allyn and
Bacon Inc., Boston, HA, 1969
15. "Seminar on Analytical Methods For Priority Pollutants," Proceedings,
US EPA, Denver, Colorado, November, 1977.
16. "Handbook for Analytical Control in Water and Wastewater Laboratories,"
US EPA, Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH
45268, March, 1979.
384<
-------
TABLE I. IKTERLABORATORY COMPARISON8
Priority
Pollutant
Fraction"
Volatile
(MS)
Volatile
Sample Spike
Acid (MS)
Acid Sample
Blank
B/N-(MS)
B/N Sample
Spike
Pesticide
(MS)
Pesticide
Sample Spike
Metals (MS)
Metals
Sample Spike
Cyanide (MS)
Cyanide
Sample Spike
Phenol ics
(MS)
Phenolics
Sample Spike
LAB
I
88+21
82+24
90+18
92+34 ~
95+25
84+18
73+8
69+_7
113+_37
100+20
103+J4
10U12
10+13
93+.15
LAB LAB
II III
95+_5
101+9 93+J3
89+_5
72+10 62+J2
78+41
61+22 55+_24
74+J9 ' -
51+18 33+10
-
103+J4
-
-
97+6
t
98+J 0
LAB LAB LAB
IV V VII
100+8 -
107+_9 -
67+_14 82+.16 -
60+15 84+.17 -
77+_15 -
68_+16 - 63+_13
88+8
93+5
103+.8 -
92j+7
lOSjfS -
93+J6 -
100+_7 -
97+9
Averagec
90+_13
92+_15
84_+13
76+J9
84+_25
68+_21
78+_ll
59+_ll
108^22
96+_ll
103+_7
96^14
101 +_8
96+11
a) The values are in units of percent recovery (P) plus or minus (+) one
standard deviations (Sp).
b) MS refers to the method standard or the standard addition to blank water.
Sample spike refers to the standard addition to a sample.
c) P and Sp are weighted averages based on the number of data points
contributed by each laboratory.
-------
TABLE II. Purgeable Orgam'csa
Compound
Acrolein
Acrylonitrile
Benzene
Bromodichloromethane
Brcmoform
Bromomethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chiorodibromomethane
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethylene
trans-7,2-Dichloroethylene
Dichloromethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
cls-1,3-Dichloropropene
trans -1-3-D1chloropropene
Ethyl benzene
Hethodb
Standard
77+30
96+^31
89+12
97+11
94 +.14
90^16
91+23
94+^23
86+12
67+22
90^18
91+^22
108+11*
83j+10
102.+12
74+,24
90+^25
82^46
94+_26
95^15
91+13
109+19
Standard0
Spike
32+30
102^28
93+24
103+31
88+12
78+15
9H33
103+24
99+17
6CH23
91+26
64^28
- 114+8*
87+21
103^27
80+32
85+35
66^66
99^30
98+20
93^16
106+28
c
386<
-------
Continuation of Table.II
Method Sample
Compound Standard Spike
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 81+31 78+31
Tetrachloroethylene 97+13 99+25
To!uene 9S+22 97+_25
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 92+21 94^36
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 102^14 103^19
Trichloroethylene 10fr+14 110+22
Trichlorofluoromethane 59+^23 67^48
Vinyl Chloride 103+30 79+22
a) The values are in terms of P ± Sp. Data from 2-4 laboratories have been
averaged except where noted with an (*) asterisk. In general the concentration
added ranged from 10 to 1000 parts per billion.
b) Standard addition to blank water.
c) Standard addition to sample. :
*Data from only one lab were available.._.
C
387-:
-------
COMPOUND
2-Chlorophenol
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
4 ,s--Di ni tro-£-cresol
2,4-D1n1trophenol
2-Nitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
Pentachlorophenol
Phenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophneol
TABLE III. ACID FRACTION3
HETHODb
STANDARD
96^16
86+24
71+19
87+_34
89+22
95+_22
65+_33
87+24
61+11
91+22
SAMPLEC
SPIKE
71+23
99^19
84+_23
72+_16
102^23
92+40
87+_22
59+46
84^22
54+_24
80+24
a) The values are In terms of P _+ Sp. Data from 2-5 laboratories have '
been averaged. In general the concentration added ranged from 20 to 2500
parts per billion.
b) Standard addition to blank water.
c) Standard addition to sample.
-r
388^
-------
TABLE IV BASE/NEUTRAL FRACTION*
C
Compound
Acenaphthene
Acenapthylene
Anthracene*^
Benzldine
Benzo(a)anthracenee
Benzo(b)fluoranthene^ -
Benzo(k)fluoranthene'f
8enzo(a)pyrene
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
Bis(2-chloroethyl) Ether
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) Ether
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
4-Bromophenyl Phenyl Ether
2-Chloronaphthalene
Chrysenee
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Di-n-butyl Phthalate
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
Method^
Standard
90+_22
83+22
98+20
44+27
105+33
96+68*
^™ t
96+68
90+22
49+39
98+48
154+;! 36
70+33
80+25
88+20
105+J33
80+42
80+_32
6&+24
67+_21
67+_22
71+85
Sample0
Spike
78+_24
79+27
79+26
40+29
51+_24
41+_21
47+_27
43+21
49+_22
80+_49
96^88
66+50
63+25
79+_21
77+_27
36+_29
58+_27
65+27
62+20
63+_21
62+45
C
389<
-------
c
Method^
Standard
71+37
43+37
122+55
115+41
84+44
97+.2S
111+26
98+24
98+31
76^26
38+28
63+22
66+36
109.+14
83+24
106.+31
72^22
86+.S4
98+20
142^41
74+22
Sample0
Spike
65+37
66+43
94+45
104+35
88+32
91+32
63+20
88+25
76+31
77+45
27+JO
58+23
67+_22
40^21
89+51
77+51
66+25
7H22
79+20
63+_20
-69+24
C
Compound
Diethyl Phthalate
Dimethyl Phthalate
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Di-n-octyl Phthalate
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine '
(and/or Azobenzene)
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Hexachloroethane
Isophorone
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
N-ni trosodi pheylamine
(and/or Diphenylamine)
N-Nitrosodi-^-propylamine
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene _ _
i
a) The values are In terms of P _+ Sp. Data from 2-5 laboratories have been
averaged except where noted with an (*) asterisk. In general the concentration
added ranged from 10 to 500 parts per billion.
b) Standard addition to blank water.
c) Standard addition to sample.
d.e.f) These isomers pairs are not separted by packed column GC. Also mass
spectral data are not sufficiently unique to allow differentiation.
*0ata from only one lab were available.
39CK
-------
e
TABLE V. PESTICIDE FRACTION*
Methodb
Standard
72+13
78413
79+21
78+14
82_+16
8H17*
82^14
76^14
85+17
7H14
65+14
67±19
74^39*
82+_25
64+76*
72^12
82j+14
83f!l*
89+12*
Sample0
Spike
v 55+12
55^12
57+22
64+11
_61±16
39_+9*
62+16
57^1 8
76+26
62+16
61+J3
66jfl4
844.30*
68^18
34^39*
49^12
65+11
42^13
Compound
AldHn
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
gamma-BHC
delta-BHC
Chlordane
4,4'-ODD
4,4'-DDE
4,4'-DDT
Dieldrin
Endosulfan I
Endosulfan II
Endosulfane Sulfate
Endrln
Endn'n Aldehyde
Heptachlor
Heptachlor Epoxide
PCB
Toxaphene
a) The values are in terms of P *_ Sp. Data from 2-4 laboratories have been
averaged except where noted with an (*)asterisk. In general the concentration
added ranged from 0.1 to 100 parts per billion.
b) Standard addition to blank water.
c) Standard addition to sample.
•data from only one lab were available.
r
391<
-------
TABLE VI. METALS, CYANDIE, AND PHENOLICS3
c
PARAMETER
Antimony
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Mercury^
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thai 1 ium
Zinc
Cyanide
Total Phenols
METHOD13
STANDARD
61+47*
120+20
89+16
9H18
99+30
136j+70
116+32
83+24
84^62
112+15
110+25-'
99+33*
122+44
103+7
101+8
SAMPLE2
SPIKE
103+24
SL ^*
97+_25
94+20
98+23
106+_25
99+24
93+_25
79+_38
101+_26
93+_20
80_+25
95+_23
106+_37
96_+14
96+11
a) The values are in terms of P _+ Sp. Data from 2-3 laboratories have been
averaged exept where noted with an (*) asterisk. In genral the concentration
added ranged from 10 to 1000 parts per billion.
b) Standard addition to blank water.
c) Standard addition to sample.
d) Analyzed by the cold vapor technique.
*Data from only one lab were available.
-r
332<
-------
TABLE VII. PRIORITY POLLUTANT SURROGATES*
Compound
(Purgeable Orgnalcs)
ds-Benzene
Bromochl oromethane
d-Chl orof onn
1 ,4-Dichlorobutane
d4-l ,2-Dichloroethane
d~Dichl oromethane
nzene
Fluorobenzene
dg-Tol uene
i ^3-1 ,1 ,1-Trichloroethane
1-chl oro-2-bromopropane
(Acids)
2-Fluorophenol
Pentafl uorophenol
LAB
LAB
LAB
139+_96
119+29
146+55
102+_25
96+20
117+41
Tri f 1 uoro-m-cresol
(Base/Neutral)
Decaf 1 uorobi phenyl
ds-Napthalene
2-f 1 uoronaphthal ene
1-fluoronaphthalene
2-fl uorobi phenyl
76+.36
84^30
55+_20
72+42
39+,! 8
76+_22'
75+^20
69+18
68+J6
63+5
95^10
98+11
96+10
97+12
95+10
93+11
50+22
41+29
101+39
46+13
-------
Table VII (cont'd)
ds-aniline 57+36
Compound LAB I lib ' LAB IVC LAB VII id
2-fluoroaniline 74+39
ds-nitrobenzene 70+21
a) The values are in terms of P _+ Sp. The concentration added ranged from
20 to 200 parts per billion. '
b) The matrix for these surrogates included influent and effluent samples
from 12 different industrial categories.
c) The matrix for these surrogates included POTW, detergent, and chemical
disposal industries.
d) The matrix for these surrogates included POTW samples only.
331+
-------
TABLE VIII. REACTIVITY GROUPS OF THE B/N PRIORITY POLLUTANTS
Method Standard Analysis
Matrix Spiked Analysis
Nonreactive Group Reactive Group Nonreactive Group Reactive Group
Laboratory
I
II
III
IV
VII
P+Sp
102+26 .
93+31
-
82f!0
_
P+Sp
.86+21
52+46
'
67^18
.
P+Sp
87+.18
60>21
.58+26
71 +.12
65+11
/
P+Sp
78+17
64+25
48+12
63+J8
57+17
Nonreactive B/N Compounds: Acenaphthene, Acenaphthylene, Anthracene, Benzo(a)anthra-
cene, Benzo(g,h,i)perylene, benzo(a)pyrene, 2-Chloronaphthalene, 1,2-,1,3-, and 1,4-Di
chlorobenzene, 2,6-Dinitrotoluene, Fluoranthene, Fluorene, Hexachlorobenzene, Naptha-
lene, Nitrobenzene, Pyrene, and 1,2,4-TrichlorobenzeTie.
Reactive B/N Compounds: Benzidine, Bis(2-chloroethyl) Ether, Bis(2-ethylhexyl),
Diethyl, and Dimethyl Phthalates, 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine, Hexachlorobutadiene,
Hexachloroethane, and Isophorone.
31*
-------
TABLE IX PROBLEM PRIORITY POLLUTANTS
COMPOUND
Dlchloromethane
bis-chloromethylether
N-nitrosodimethylamine
Di-n-butylphthalate
Bi s-(2-ethylhexyl)phthal ate
1,2-diphenylhydrazine
Benzidine
Hexachlorocyclopentadi ene
Endrin Aldehyde
Anthracene and Phenanthrene
Chrysene and benzo(a)-
Anthracene
benzo(b)fluoranthrene and
benzo(k)fluoranthrene
PROBLEM
Frequently found in"blanks and
samples because of In lab con-
tamination.
Readily hydrolyzed in water., '
Poor chromatographic properties.
Frequently found in blanks.
Frequently found in blanks.
Thermally decomposes to diphenyl
amine and tetraphenylhydrazine.
Poor chromatographic properties.
Subject to thermal and hydrolytic
decomposition.
Is readily oxidized.
Coelute on packed columns.
Coelute on packed columns.
Coelute on packed columns.
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON. D.C. 20460
OFFICE OF
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
SUBJECT: Toxics Data System—Evaluation of Region VJZ Data Set
FROM: Chris Timm, Director /'pLs^'
Quality Assurance Management Staff£,
Office of Monitoring and Technical Support (RD-680)
TO: Edmund Notzon, Director
Monitoring and Data Support Division
Office of Water and Waste Management (WH-553)
In response to the request by Fred Leutner at the May Agency Quality Assurance Advisory
Committee meeting, the. QAMS agreed to review your evaluation of the four data sets.
prepared for the initiation of the Toxics Substances Data Systems. Subsequently, I met
with Paul Durand of your staff to review the files on your original assessment. As I
understand it, the initial assessment was developed solely by phone coversations between
your staff and the project officers or principal investigators with no further documentation
of the compliance with data evaluation criteria.
Consequently, I requested Bob Booth, Deputy Director, Environmental Monitoring Systems
Laboratory-Cincinnati, to evaluate the Region vn data set in order to verify their reported
status for each of the criteria being considered. Bob completed his evaluation during the
week of June 23-26, 1980, and a copy of his report is attached.
Based upon this report, we believe that the Region YE data set is of adequate quality
and documentation for input into the Toxics Substances Data System. We do recommend,
though, that some type of assessment of the data quality, such as the Quality Assurance
Criteria recommended earlier or preferably, a numerical assessment of precision and
accuracy be input along with the data in order to assure future credibility.
V.'e are proceeding with a review of the other three data sets, based upon the information
provided by your staff, and should have our evaluation reports to you before September
30, 1980.
Attachment
cc: Courtney Riorcsn (RD-680)
Richard Dov.-d (A-101)
Robert Booth (E.MSL-CI)
Thomas Stanley (RD-680)
sjrnov Verner '(RD-680)
"
39'
-------
X*0*"*,
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND SUPPORT LABORATORY
CINCINNATI. OHIO 45263
DATE: July 24, 1980
SUBJECT: Toxics Data System; Evaluation of Region 7 Data
FROM: Robert L. Booth, Deputy Director /
Environmental Monitoring and Support
Laboratory - Cincinnati
TO: Christopher M.'Tiwm,.. Director
Quality Assurance Management Staff
Office of Monitoring and Technical Support
Per our discussions on- this Subject, I reviewed the Region 7 data sets
that are being considered as part of the pilot storage study for TOXET.
The following comments are made around the headings of the "check list
reference" table given in Ned Notion's draft of April 23, 1980. This
evaluation was made as part of our on-site evaluation of Region 7's
laboratory during the week of June 23-26, 1980.
1. STATION IDENTIFICATION
The data to be considered for the'pilot study will be that
generated from the POTW studies being done for O'FarreVs -
group in headquarters. The stations were apparently picked
by O'Farrel. Burns and Row, the prime contractor, is responsible
for the sampling. In my discussion with Charles Hensley and
Billy Fairless, it was recognized that there is probably not
an adequate station identification/description for STORET/TOXET
purposes at this time. Providing resources were made available
to the region, this information can be provided.
2. IN STORET FORMAT
The identification number is assigned by the prime contractor and
the sample is shipped to the regional laboratory. Once the
analysis has been completed and the results reviewed by Charles
Hensley the data are forwarded to O'FarreTl. Regional staff do
not believe the data are currently in EPA STORET format. Again,
the region does have the necsessary expertise to provide this
required input but additional resources would need to be.provided,
398<
-------
3. QUALITY ASSURANCE (QA) PLAN APPROVED
No formal plan was prepared for the study. In reviewing their
QA program I learned that the following protocol is being used.
»
a. In a set of 12-16 samples representing a single POTW site,
the region is provided with a field blank and at least
one duplicate sample by the contractor.
b. A spiked sample is prepared in the laboratory.
c. Once a set of approximately 15 duplicate and spiked
data points is available, i.e., from 15 different POTW
sources, a statistical summary is prepared.
d. Two standard deviations is used as a warning
limit and three standard deviations as a control
limit. These limits are generated by the lab
staff on the above mentioned samples. Their precision and
accuracy data are significantly better than the data
being provided by the other three contractors in the
POTW studies. In factf as a side issue, in my review
of the data, I would strongly recommend that at least
2 of the 3 contractors be fired and that their data
be purged from the system.
The regional QA plan is now available in draft form. As
you know, however, it does not provide the kind of detail
that is needed for a laboratory QA plan. This will probably
be forthcoming when the laboratory staff is required to
prepare standard operating procedures and QA project plans
as a part of the Agency's Mandatory QA Program.
4. QA AUDITS
The laboratory has actively participated in our performance
evaluation studies, and they routinely make use of our Quality
Control check samples. A review of their data shows that they
are within the Agency's acceptance limits 98% of the time for all
contaminants at varied concentration levels. Clearly, they rank
as one of the Agency's best laboratories in this category.
5. QUALITY CONTROL (QC)
It was apparent from our on-site lab evaluation and from the candid
conversations that I had with management, that region 7 has an
excellent on-going QC program. As is the case with a number of
programs, there is a need to document in some areas what is being
-------
done. Overall, the field collection, laboratory analysis, and
data management systems are being"quality-controlled in an
exemplary manner.
6. PRECISION AND ACCURACY
As indicated, precision and accuraricy data are available on real
world samples. More importantly, they have a strong data base from
previous studies to compare their current performance samples.
Their methods of calibration are well documented and they are
readily available. In this regard, it should be noted that Dr.
Jerry Dias, a consultant to their program, has done an outstanding
job in presenting their QA data in an easy to follow manner.
Perhaps even more noteworthy, he has had an opportunity to
review the data and make some interesting observations concerning
the fate of these organic contaminants in the environment.
7- METHODS
Approved methods are being used in the POTW studies. The organic
analysis is being done by use of GC/MS techniques and the toxic
metals are being done by ICP . Both methods are published in the
Federal Register and will be part of final rulemaking for section
304(h) methodology in the near future.
8. DATA REVIEW
ie following system is used for review of data:
a. Data are provided to a key puncher with an absolute mini-
mum number of transfers by staff.
b. Key puncher provides data cards which are verified by a
second party.
c. Roy Crossland, Data Coordinator for the region, does a
spot review of the data printout and makes certain
checks to verify validation of data.
d. Charles Hensley, Acting Chief, also reviews the printout
in a similar manner before approving its forwarding to
headquarters. Although a detailed line-by-line
review of the data is not being made, any major errors are
probably, being caught by this review process.
As we have discussed, a very important element that is not covered in the table
heading is that of sample conditions. This would include the type of
containers used, the preservative used, and the holding times that are required.
In reviewing these elements with the laboratory staff, it would appear that
4OCK
-------
there is a holding time problem for the organics. This is limited to the
holding time that the sample extraction may be held after the liquid liquid
extraction has been made on the aqueous sample. In some cases, due to
instrumental failure or an unusually large number of samples coming in at
one time, sample extractions are being held for longer than the currently
recognized holding times. They are already running two shifts to alleviate
this problem and have taken other actions to limit the instances in which
sample extracts are held too long.
All of the above information was provided to Paul Durand in a meeting held in
Alexandria, Virginia, on July 17. At his request, I provided him this detailed
information so that he would be properly perpared for a briefing he was to
have with Ned Notzon on July 25. As I noted to him, I believe that, overall,
the POTW data being generated by Region 7 can be used in this pilot study.
It is obvious, however, that certain elements need to be strengthened
before we can consciously say "yes" on the check list table.'
cc: Charles Hensley, Chief, Laboratory Branch, Surveillance and Analysis
Division, U.S. EPA, Region 7
Billy Fairless, Deputy Director, Surveillance and Analysis Division,
U.S. EPA, Region 7
------- |