Fate of Priority  Pollutants in Publicly
Owned Treatment Work:  Documentation for
TOXET Data Set
Burns and  Roe  Industrial Services Corp,
Pararaus, NJ
Prepared  for

Environmental  Protection Agency
Washington,  DC
Oct 79
                   U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
                National Technical Information Service

-------
 REPORT DOCUMENTATION
        PAGE
  i. REPORT NO.
   EPA 440/1-79-301
PBS1-228C24
4. TW« and SuWttU
 Fate of Priority Pollutants  In  Publicly owned
 Treatment  Work  - Documentation  for TOXET Data Set
                                                                                1979
7. Author*))
 Howard Feller
                                                                               Orf»miatlon R«ot- No.
9. P«rfafmln« Onjmiutton Nwn* and Addr
                                                                      10. Pnt«a/Ta«k/Wani Unit Mo.
 Burns and  Roe. Industrial Services  Corporation
 283 Route  17  South
 Paramus, New  Jersey   07650
                                                 11. ComncttC} or OnnttO) No.

                                                 (O

                                                 (CD
 12. Sooowrma; Organisation Nun* and Addntas
                                                                      13. Type of R«oort & Pvnod Cav»r»d
 US EPA
 401 M Street,  SW
 Washington,  O.C.
20460
 13. 3u0pt«m«nnrs Not**
 IS. Abstract (Umrt 200 wroa)

     The  US  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has  Initiated a program  to  study the
 occurrence  and  fate of 129 selected toxic organic and Inorganic pollutants  (priority
/pollutants)  by  means of a sampling program, at 40 publicly owned treatment works
 (POTW's).   The  first phase of  this work was a pilot study at two POTX's to  select the
 parameters  of interest and establish detailed technical  procedures that will  be used
 for the  overall  project.  In this  report, data obtained  from the two POTU's  selected
 for the  pilot study are presented.  Since these two plants have different proportions
 of Industrial  contributions and  priority pollutant levels in POTW influents  is
 examined.   Additionally, other specific phinomena were studied, including the overall
 removal  of  toxic pollutants, removal  of toxic pollutants, removal  mechanisms,
 concentration of toxic pollutants  1n sludge and the formation of chlorinated
 hydrocarbons during chlorine hydrocarbon during chlorine disinfection.  EPA  protocol
 for collection,  sampling and analysis of priority pollutants was followed for each
 procedure performed in the study,  except where noted.   Detailed of specific  goals of
 the pilot study are outlined below.
 17. Doeumont AndyiM  a. OncrlDtor*

 Publicly  owned treatment works,  TOXIC pollutants, inorganic,  organic, data  systems.
   a. ldantl1t«n/OpwvCna*d Torn*
                                        PHOOUCT OF:
                                        NATIONAL  TECHNICAL
                                       INFORMATION SERVICE
                                           U.S. OEPHHTHEIH OF COMUEIICE
                                            SMIMflElO. (». 21S1
     COSAT1 FMd/Grauo
 It iv.il.oiMty

 Release Unlimited
                                                                                21. No. of ?*«•*
                                  20.
                                                                             _
                                                                         AgCOCV 22- "re.
                                                                     oflinn Q
S*« ANS.-i39.Iff)
                                                                                      FO*M Z77 (4-771

                                                                 AUG 10 198 r™ •"""—
                                                                    LIBRARY

-------
ATTENTION








AS NOTED IN THE NTIS ANNOUNCEffiNT,



PORTIONS OF THIS REPORT ARE NOT LZGISLZ



HOWEVER, IT IS THE BEST REPRODUCTION



AVAILABLE FROM THE COPY SENT TO NTIS.
                   1<

-------
SECTION I

-------
                                   INDEX
DATA SET:  Publicly owned Treatment Works - Burns and Rowe
                                TABLE OF CONTENTS
DESIGN
Fate of Priority Pollutants
in Publicly Owned Treatment
Works:  Pilot Study
I.  Sutmiary and Conclusions
           Summary
           Conclusions
II.     Introduction
           Establishment of Sampling Techniques
           Establishment of Appropriate Sampling
            Points
           Development of Analytical Protocol  for
            Samples
           Fate of Priority Pollutants  in  POTW's
SECTION I
   Page

     1
     1
     1
     3
     3
     3

-------
 III.       Plant Selection                                    5
               Plant A                                       5
               Plant B                                       5

  IV.       Sample Point Description                           7
               Plant A                                       8
               Plant B.       -.                             10

  V.       Sampling                                          u
               Sampling Frequency                           13
               Sampling Techniques                          13
               Sampling Collection Procedures               13
               Protocol and Protocol Modificatios           13

     Data Sunmary                                           16
               Major Trends                                 16

VH. Analysis of Results                                    19
               Fate of Priority                             19
               Result of Sampling Frequency and  Sampling
                Point Selection Experiments                 30
               Potential of Additional Sample Points        33

-------
LIST OS" TABLES           Nuntoer                   Title                     Page








                         IV-1      Sampling Frequency at Plant A           7



                         TV-2      Sampling Frequency at Plant 3           3



                         VI-1      Sunnary. Percent Occurrences  of  Organics



                                    Pollutants - Plant A                   17



                         VI-2      Sumnary Percent Occurrences of Organics



                                    Pollutants - Plant B                   18



                         VII-1     Percent Occurrences of Priority  Pollutants



                                    Plant A                                20



                         VTI-2     Percent Occurrences of Priority  Pollutants



                                    Plant B                                22



                         VII-3     Plant A. Data Surrmary Week 1  Average    23



                         VH-4     Plant B. Data Sunmary                   24



                         VII-5     Plant A. Mass Balance Weekly  Summary    26



                         VH-6     Plant B. Mass Balance Weekly  Sunmary    28



                         VII-7     Plant A. Effect of Chlorine on Priority



                                    Pollutant Concentrations               30



                         VII-8     Plant B, Effect of Chlorine on Priority



                                    Pollutant Concentrations               31



                         VII-9     3-aour Composites vs. Metals



                                    Concentrations                         32

-------
LIST OF FIOJRES          Number               Title                    Page







                         f7-l       Influent Sampling Point  at



                                   Plant A                            9



                         17-2      Prechlorinated  Effluent



                                   Sampling Point Plant B             11



                         17-3      Final Effluent Sampling  Point



                                   Plant B                            12



                         V-l      Automatic Sampler                   14

-------
                 - QOALUY ASSURANCE FOR LABORATORY
                  ANALYSIS OF PRIORIT?  POLLUTANTS
i     Preface
ii    List, of Tables
ill   List: of Figures
iiii  Acknowledgements
i
II    GE^EPAL GtlALITY' CUNI'KJL CCNSEEPATICNS  AMD ANALTTIC^L
      MEIECECaJCGIZS
EL!   PRIOKTIY POUUTSOT LABOHATOKf QCRLnY CCNTSDL
IV    PERFOIWANC COWJ1HJL LECTS FOR PRIORITY POLLCTANTS

-------
                                                                      13.



                              TABL£ OF CONTENTS


                                                                           Page


           PREFACE	,	•	    ™
           ACKNOWLEDGMENTS	

Chapter
    I       IMPORTANCE OF QUALITY CONTROL
                                                	l-l
        1.1   General  	•	     }•[
        1.2   Quality Assurance Programs	'   •   f'^
        1.3   Analytical Methods	   }*-
        1.4   Reference	      •     •  •  •   l**

2       LABORATORY SERVICES	   -•!
        2.1   General	   M
        2.2   Distilled Water	   M
        2.3   Compressed Air	   --5
      •  2.4   Vacuum	   2-5
        2.5.  Kood System	   2-5
        2.6   Electrical Services	2-6
        2.7   References	    .    •     .   .     1-6

3       INSTRUMENT SELECTION   	   3-1
        3.1.  Introduction	   3-1
        3.1   Analytical Balances	   3-1
        3.3   pH/Setecrive-Icn Meters	         	   3-3
        3.4   Conductivity M*ters	   3-6
        3.5   Turbidimeters (Nepheiometers;  ...     	     . .    .   3-~
        3.6   Spectrometers	   3-3
        3.7   Organic Carbon Analyzers ....        	3-13
        3.3.  GiS Chromatograpos   	          	3-14
       .3.9 .  'References	      	3-1 a

4       GLASSWARE	        .          i-|
        4.1   General'	                  .     .          ^.\
        4.2'  Types of Glass-ware   ....                               4-2
        4.3   Volumetric Analyses   	   4-3
        4.4   Federal Specifications for Volumetric Glassware            •       4-J.
        4.5   Cleaning of  Glass and Porcelain  ...        .  .             j_5
        4,6   Special Geaning Rsqutrements	     	       4-0
        ~.~   Disposable Glassware    	         . .       0.7
        4.8   Speciaiizid Glassware	                              4-r
        4.9   Fritted Wire	          .  .   ^
        4.10  References	                .  .        .1.9

•^      REAGENTS. SOLVENTS. AND GASES   .          '                  5-1
        5.1   Introduction      .                                           5,1
        5.2   Reagent Quality .  : •   .       .                               _-,;

-------
                                                                       14.
        5-3   Elimination of Determinate Errors
        5.4   References	
        QUALITY CONTROL FOR ANALYTICAL PERFORMANCE
        6.1   Introduction	
        6.2   The Industrial Approach to QC	
        6 J   Applying Control Qiarts in Environmental Laboratories
        6.4   Recommended Laboratory Quality Assurance Program
        6.5   Outline of a Comprehensive Quality Assurancs Program
        6.6   Related Topics   	
        6.7   References	 -  •  -
        DATA HANDLING AND REPORTING
        7.1    Introduction	
        7.2   The .Analytical Value  	
        7.3   Glossary of Statistical Terms   . .
        7.4   Report Forms	
        7.5   References	
        SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR TRACE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
        3.1  Introduction	
        3.2  Sampling and Sample Handling	
        SJ  Extract Handling	
        8.4  Supplies and Reagents	•.  .  .
        3.5  Quality .Assurance	
        3.6  Reference	

        SKILLS AND TRAINING	
        9.1  General  	
        9.2  Skills   	
        9.3  Training	
10    "  WATER AND WASTEWATER SAMPLING
        10.1  Introduction	
        10.2  .Areas of Sampling	
        10.3  References	
        RADIOCHEMISTRY	
        11.1  Introduction	
        11.2  Sample Collection   ...        .    .
        11.3  Laboratory Practices  	
        11.4  Quality Control	
        1 1.5  References	

        MICROBIOLOGY	
        12.1  Background	     ...
        12.2  Specific N'esds in Microbiology	
        12.3  Intralaboratory Quality Control   .  .
        12.4  Intsriaboratory Quality Control •  .-
        1 2.5  Development of a Formal Quality Assurance Program
        1 2.5  Documentation of" 2 Quaiicy Assurance Program
                                   M

-------
                                                                        IS.
            12.7  Oiain-ofXTustody Procedures for Microbiological Samples  ....   12-3
            12.8  Reference*	12-10

   13        AQUATIC BIOLOGY	   13-1
            13.1  Summary of General Guidelines	   13-1
            13.2  Discussion	   13-2
            13J  Reference	   13-*

   14        LABORATORYSAFcTY	,	   14.1
            14.1  Law and Authority for Safety and  Health	   14-1
            14.2  EPA Policy on Laboratory Safery	   14-5
            14.3  Laboratory Safety Practices	   14-7
            14.4  Report of Unsafe or Unheaithful Condition	:. 14-15
            14.5  References	14-15

Appendix A-Suggested Cheddist for the Safety Evaluation of E?A Laboratory Arcas   A-t

-------
                                 ASSURANCE PLANS                 Section II
 I.   Sludge Analytical Protocol
                                                                       Page
     1.1  Scope and Application                                         1
     1.2  Summary                                                       1
     1.3  Apparatus and Reagents                                        2
     1.4  Sanpling and Preservation                                     4
     1.5  Preparation of Purgeable Organic
           Free Water                                                   5
     1.6  Preparation of Standards                                      6
     1.7  Saitple Preparation and Purging                               10
     1.3  Analysis of the Sample Purge                                 12
     1.9  Purgeable Organics Analytical Quality Assurance              12
     1.10 Data Handling                                                15

II.   Method for Semi-volatile Organics                                 26
     2.1  Scope and Application                                        26
     2. 2  Surmary                                                      26
     2.3  Apparatus                                                    27
     2.4  Reagents                                                     28
     2.5  Preparation of Standards                                     30
     2.6  Sanpling and Preservation                                    30
     2.7  Sanple Extraction                                            31
     2.3  Extract dean-up                                             33
     2.9  Saitple Extract Analysis                                      35
     2.10 Extractable Organics Analytical Quality Assurance            37
     2.11 Data Handling                                                41

-------
     Appendix                                                    51

in. Quality Assurance for Laboratory Analysis of 129 Priority Pollutants

 17. Priority Pollutant Methodology Quality Assurance Seview
                                                                Page
     1.    Abstract
     2.    Introduction                                           2
     3.    Analytical Methodolcgy                                  3
     4.    Quality Assurance Requirements                          5
     5.    Interlaboratory Comparison                              9
     6.    Purgeable Organic Compounds                           10
     7,    Phenolic Acids                                         12
     8.    Base/Neutrals Ccmpunds                                 14
    9.   Pesticides                                             17
   10.   Metals                                                 17
   11.   Cyanide and Total Phenols                              17
   12.   Summary and Conclusion                                 18
 V.  Evaluation, of  Begion VH Data Set

-------
Water                                  EPA-440/1-79-300
Fate of Priority
Pollutants in
Publicly Owned
Treatment Works

Pilot Study
by
Howard Feiler
Burns and Roe Industrial Services Corporation
283 Route 1 7 South
Paramus, New Jersey 07652
Project Officer
R. Dean Jarman
Effluent Guidelines Division
Water Planning and Standards
Office of Water and Waste Management
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Washington DC 20460

-------
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS     Acknowledgement is made to Burns and Roe Industrial Services
                                 Corporation, Paramus, New Jersey, the EPA contractor for the project.
                                 The following members of the technical staff made significant
                                 contributions to the overall project effort and execution of the sampling
                                 program: Howard D. Feiler, Paul Storch, Henry Celestino, Gary Martin,
                                 and Mark Sadowski.

                                The Environmental Protection Agency personnel contributing to this
                                effort were Project Officer, Dean Jarman, Office of Research and
                                Development, Center for Environmental Research Information;
                                Assistant Project Officer, Arthur Shattuck, Effluent Guidelines Division;
                                Jeffrey Denrt, Effluent Guidelines Division, and Thomas O'Farrell, Office
                                of the Deputy Assistant Administrator for Water Planning and
                                Standards.

-------
TABLE  OF  CONTENTS         |.  Summary and Conclusions	 1
                                          Summary	 1
                                          Conclusions  	,	 1

                                  II.  Introduction	 3
                                          Establishment of Sampling Techniques 	 3
                                          Establishment of Appropriate Sampling Points	3
                                          Development of Analytical Protocol for Samples	4
                                          Fate of Priority Pollutants in POTW's 	 4

                                  III.  Plant Selection	 5
                                          Plant A	 5
                                          Plant B	 5

                                  IV.  Sample Point Description	 7
                                          Plant A	 8
                                          Plant 3	10

                                  V.  Sampling	13
                                          Sampling Frequency	13
                                          Sampling Techniques	13
                                          Sampling Collection Procedures	13
                                          Protocol and Protocol Modifications	13

                                  VI.  Data Summary	16
                                          Major Trends 	16

                                 VII.  Analysis of Results	19
                                          Fate of Priority Pollutants	19
                                          Results of Sampling Frequency and Sampling Point
                                            Selection Experiments	30
                                          Potential of Additional Sample Points	33

-------
LIST OF TABLES              Number                          ™e

                                 IV-1      Sampling Frequency at Plant A	7

                                 IV-2      Sampling Frequency at Plant B	8

                                 VM      Summary. Percent Occurrences of Organic
                                            Pollutants—Plant A	17

                                 VI-2      Summary Percent Occurrences of Organic
                                            Pollutants—Plant B	IB

                                 Vll-1      Percent Occurrences of Priority Pollutants—Plant A	20

                                 Vll-2      Percent Occurrences of Priority Pollutants—Plant B	22

                                 VII-3      Plant A, Data Summary Week 1 Average	23

                                 VII-4      Plant B. Data Summary	24

                                VII-5      Plant A. Mass Balance Weekly Summary	26

                                VII-6     Plant B. Mass Balance Weekly Summary	28

                                VII-7     Plant A. Effect of Chlorine on Priority Pollutant
                                           Concentrations	30

                                Vtl-8     Plant B. Effect of Chlorine on Priority Pollutant
                                           Concentrations	31

                                VII-9     8-Hour Composites vs. Metals Concentrations	32
              IV

-------
LIST OF FIGURES             Number                           Title


                                 IV-1      Influent Sampling Point at Plant A	 9

                                 IV-2      Prechlormated Effluent Sampling Point Plant B	 11

                                 IV-3      Final Effluent Sampling Point Plant 8	12

                                 V-1      Automatic Sampler	 14
                                           1>*N
                                           /'

-------
I.  SUMMARY AND
   CONCLUSIONS
Summary

The purpose of this report is to
present the results of a two-plant
pilot study designed to determine
future operating parameters to be
used during a study of the fate of
priority pollutants in publicly
owned treatment works
(POTW's). The scope of the overall
project is anticipated to
encompass 7-day, 24-hour
sampling at 40strategically
located POTW's, representing a
variety of municipal treatment
technologies, size ranges, and
percentages of industrial flow. A
major goal of the project is to
characterize the impact of toxic
pollutants, from all sources, on
POTW operations. In addition the
effect of secondary treatment on
priority pollutants will be studied.

The pilot study was conducted at
two POTW's with significantly
different characteristics. These
two plants provided contrasts in
many areas, including size,
percent industrial flow, age,
operation, sludge conditioning
methodology, and capacity
utilized.             ..    '

During the two-plant program the
analytical and logistical factors of
field sampling were tested to
determine the optimum field
methodologies and also to ascer-
tain the feasibility of studying
other aspects of POTW
operations. Additionally, prelimin-
ary information regarding the
incidence, impact  and fate of
priority pollutants in POTW's was
developed. The data obtained
from this study will impact the
pretreatment regulations for
indirect dischargers as to credits
allowed (if any) for acceptable
treatability or removal of toxics in
POTW's.
Conclusions

1.  A significantly higher
    incidence of organic priority
    pollutants was observed at
    the more industrial Plant A as
    compared to the essentially
    non-industrial Plant 8.

2.  Seven of nine metallic priority
    pollutants were found to have
    higher average concentra-
    tions in the Plant A influent.

3.  Of nine organic priority
    pollutants measured in Plant
    A's influent at an average
    concentration greater than 10
    fjg/l, eight were reduced by a
    minimum of 50 percent.
    Organic priority pollutants at
    Plant 8 occurred at such low
    levels that percent removal
    data could not be determined.

4.  Metallic priority pollutants
    were removed over a broad
    range of efficiencies at both
    plants.

5.  The following priority
    pollutants were concentrated
    in the residues generated at
    Plant A: cadmium, copper,
    lead, nickel, zinc,
    acenaphthene, dichlorobro-
    momethane, 1,2-benzanthra-
    cene, 3,4-benzofluoranthene,
    fluorene and pyrene.
    Similarly, at Plant 8,
    chromium, copper,  lead,
    nickel, zinc, acrylonitnle,
    dichlorobromomethane and
    3,4 benzofluoranthene were
    concentrated in the sludge.

6.  Refractory, but volatile
    organic priority pollutants
    such as benzene, 1,1,1-
    trichloroethane, ethylben-
    zene, toluene and
    trichloroethylene were well
    removed but not concentrated
    in plant sludges, suggesting
    air stripping as a possible
    removal mechanism.

-------
7.   Daily variation of influent
    metallic priority pollutant
    concentrations was observed
    at both POTW's, but the vari-
    ation was most pronounced
    at Plant A. Metals concentra-
    tions increased during the
    latter parts of the work week
    and dipped during weekends.
    Similar effects were recordec
    for conventional pollutants,
    but, in general, for organic
    priority pollutants, levels
    were too low to permit
    observation of trends.
8.   The 8-hour versus 24-hour
    composite experiment that
    was carried out on the Plant A
    influent showed that there
    was no appreciable difference
    between daily concentration
    values of organic priority pollu-
    tants. However, at the more
    industrial Plant A, metals
    concentrations were found to
    be significantly higher during
    the 0800 to 1600 (8:00 a.m. to
    4:00 p.m.) period.
9.   Sampling and analysis of
    prechlonnated effluent
    samples produced evidence
    that formation of toxic
    chlorinated hydrocarbons in
    chlorine contact chambers
    and receiving streams does
    occur.

10.  The mass loading of priority
     pollutants in the floatables
     and sludge  filtrate was
     found to be very small, as
     compared to the mass
     loading in total POTW
     residues.

-------
II.   INTRODUCTION
The United States Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) has
initiated a program to study the
occurrence and fate of 129
selected toxic organic and
inorganic pollutants (priority)
pollutants) by means of a
sampling program, at 40 publicly
owned treatment works
(POTW's). The first phase of this
work was a pilot study at two
POTW's to select the parameters
of interest and establish detailed
technical procedures that will be
used for the overall project. In this
report, data obtained from the two
POTW'S selected for the pilot
study are presented. Since these
two plants have different
proportions of industrial flow,
the relationship  between  indus-
trial contributions and priority
pollutant levels in POTW influents
is examined. Additionally, other
specific phenomena were
studied, including the overall
removal of toxic pollutants,
removal mechanisms, concentra-
tion of toxic pollutants in sludge
and the formation of chlorinated
hydrocarbons during chlorine
disinfection. EPA protocol' for
collection, sampling and analysis
of priority pollutants was followed
for each procedure performed in
the study, except where noted.
Details of specific goals of the
pilot study are outlined below.
Establishment of Sampling
Techniques

An effort was made during
sampling at the pilot facilities to
determine the procedure best
suited for obtaining the most
representative samples from each
treatment plant over the course of
the entire 40-plant program. The
effort focused  on determining an
appropriate sample frequency for
obtaining the most representative
picture of wastewater
fluctuations which occur at a
typical sewage treatment facility,
as well as determining which
days would yield the most
representative samples, should
the final sampling plan be limited
to less than seven days of
sampling per week.

Establishment of Appropriate
Sampling Points

Determination of the appropriate
sampling points to be used in the
remainder of the 40-plant
program was another focus of the
pilot study. Samples were taken
at different intermediate points in
the wastewater treatment
processes to ascertain which
sampling points would provide
the best information on the fate of
priority pollutants as they pass
through the POTW.
                                  'Guidelines Estaolisning Test Procedure* for the
                                  Analysis of Pollutants. To be puolisned cn trie
                                  Ftdarat Regular. Proposed Amendments to
                                  40CFRPan136.

-------
Development of Analytical
Protocol for Samples

Another goal of the pilot study
was to provide samples to be used
in analytical protocol
development. The present EPA
protocol for the analysis of
industrial waste water samples is
not specifically suitable for
evaluation of municipal
wastewater or sludge samples.
For example, analytical
techniques for municipal sludges,
which are characterized by high
solids content, require different
techniques from those required
for the cleaner effluent streams or
industrial wastewaters for which
the protocols were originally
developed. To assure that
repeatable and accurate results
are obtained throughout the
duration of the 40-plant study, the
samples collected during the pilot
work were provided to analytical
laboratories for the experimental
development of new protocol
procedures. Replicate analyses
were completed using different
methods in order to develop
appropriate procedures to be used
for the full study.
Fate of Priority Pollutants in
POTW's

A further goal of the pilot program
was to develop preliminary
conclusions on the fate of the
priority pollutants in POTW's.
These conclusions will be
substantiated as the sampling
progresses through the 40-plant
schedule and a detailed technical
report will be forthcoming after
completion of the project.

-------
III. PLANT SELECTION
For the pilot study, two
conventional activated sludge
facilities were chosen for
evaluation. Plant A is a 120
Mgal/d design capacity plant with
approximately 70 percent of its
organic loading and 30 percent of
its flow contributed by industry,
while Plant B is a 15 Mgal/d
design capacity plant with approx-
imately 2 percent industrial flow.

The following is a characteriza-
tion of the two POTW's sampled
during the pilot study.

Plant A

The design capacity of Plant A is
300 Mgal/d primary flow and 120
Mgal/d secondary flow. Under
normal dry weather conditions,
the flow through this system
varies between 85 percent to 90
percent of its secondary capacity.
During the first week of sampling
at the plant, the flow averaged
only 91.0 Mgal/d.

The original primary treatment
facility was constructed in  1924,
and most of the sewers are as old
or older than the primary system.
It is estimated that the collection
system is 60 percent separate
sewers and 40 percent combined
sewers.

The treatment unit operations at
this conventional activated sludge
POTW begin with gravity flow
from the drainage area to the bar
screens and grit chambers, from
which lift pumps elevate the
wastewater for gravity flow
through the rest of the plant. After
the lift pumps, the wastewater
passes through pre'-aeration,
primary settling, clarification, and
into the aeration chambers. After
aeration, clarification, and
chiorination, the wastewater is
discharged to a local stream.
Sludge handling at this POTW
involves primary sludge
thickening by gravity thickeners,
secondary sludge thickening by
dissolved air flotation (DAF).
vacuum filtration and
incineration. During the sampling
period at Plant A, the primary
sludge flow averaged 323,000
gal/d and the secondary (waste
activated) sludge flow averaged
1.5 Mgal/d.

Industrial contributions to the
flow are primarily from several
major industries: pharmaceutical
manufacture, petrochemicals,
plating operations, and
automotive foundries. Also
contributing to Plant A's sewage
collection system are some coking
operations and some food
processing plants.

Plant B

The design capacity of Plant 8 is
15 Mgal/d, but under normal
operations between 3 and 10
Mgal/d receive secondary
treatment. During the sampling
period of this pilot study the .
influent flow to the facility
averaged 8.09 Mgal/d
(56,635,000 gallons during the
period August 6 to 13. 1978). This
18-year-old treatment facility
(updated and expanded most
recently in 1973) is designed for a
discharge with an effluent quality
of not more than 10 mg/l
biochemical oxygen demand and
1 2 mg/l of suspended solids. The
average biochemical oxygen
demand and total suspended
solids discharges during the week
of sampling were 25 mg/l and 1 9
mg/l, respectively.

-------
The treatment unit operations
utilized at this conventional
activated sludge facility are as
follows: Wastewater flows from
the sewer system to a diversion
chamber from which it is pumped
to a height which allows gravity
flow to the rest of the plant. The
wastewater then passes through
parallel detritus tanks (grit
chambers), comminutors. pre-
aeration chambers and into the
primary settling tank. After
primary settling, wastewater
flows to the aeration tanks,
secondary settling, chlorination,
and is discharged.

The pcimary sludge flow at this
POTW is pumped to sludge
holding tanks where it is
combined with the thickened (via
OAF)  waste activated sludge.
From  this point, the combined
sludge passes to the sludge
conditioning facilities where it is
heated and pressurized prior to
vacuum filtration. The decant
from the sludge conditioning
system and the filtrate is either
returned to the sludge
conditioning building, or bled to
the head of the aeration tanks.
The filter cake is incinerated with
the resulting ash being  slurned to
a diked lagoon on the plant
property.
During the sampling period, the
primary sludge flow averaged
29,400 gal/d (205.860 gallons
over the 7-day period). Sludge
was usually pumped once per 8-
hour work shift, and samples
were taken during each pumping.
The waste activated sludge was
usually wasted only one time per
week; the one time it was pumped
during the sampling period, a
sample was collected after the
pumping. The estimated flow
during that one pumping was
8,000 gallons. (No accurate flow
reading for this pumping was
available.)

The sewer system for Plant B
consists primarily of combined
sewers, broken down into four
main trunk lines covering the far
sections of the 29.4-square mile
(or 22.5 according to POTW
handout) drainage area. The
sewer lines are mostly concrete
construction and average 20
years in age, with some lines
being over 50 years old. The age
of the sewer lines accounts for
the estimate that as much as 40
to 50 percent of the total flow to
the POTW can be attributed to
infiltration in the subsystems and
interceptors, according to the
facilities plan, completed under
the authority of Section 201  of the
Clean Water Act (PL 95-217).
The industrial contribution to the
wastewater flow to Plant B can be
considered minimal, because the
areawide waste treatment
management plan under Section
208 of the Clean Water Act lists
the zoning breakdown of the
drainage area as 96.6 percent
residential, 1.0 percent retail
business and offices, and 2.4
percent industrial. The industries
associated with this drainage
area are grain elevators, oil and
fuel terminals, machine tool  and
metalworking companies, box and
insulation companies, and one
major chemical facility with its
own National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) dis-
charge permit. With such a small
industrial flow. Plant B is con-
sidered to give a general approxi-
mation of a typical residential
treatment facility.
                                                 23<

-------
IV.  SAM RLE POINT
     DESCRIPTION
In an effort to determine the
priority pollutant loads on the
different waste streams within
the two POTW's studied, several
additional sample points were
selected that would not normally
be evaluated. The results of these
analyses will be discussed in a
following section of this report.
At Plant A. nine sampling Points
ware used, as listed m Table IV-1.
Samples were taken on seven
consecutive days at the major
points (influent, sludges,
effluent), and an additional seven
consecutive days at the influent
only. (Extra influent samples were
taken for analyses of 8-hour
versus 24-hour compositing of
influent. See Section VII.)
    TABLE IV-1.   SAMPUNG FREQUENCY AT PLANT A
                                      Grabs for VOA. O&G         Type of
Point
Influent
Effluent
before
Chlorination
Final
Effluent
Primary
Sludge
Secondary
Sludge
Floatadles
(scum)
Combined
Sludge
Tap Water
Vacuum Filter
FHtrate
Collection Method
Automatic Sampler
Automatic Sampler
Automatic Sampler
Manual Composite
Automatic Sampler
Manual Composite
Manual Composite
One Time Grab
One Time Grab
Cn and Phenol
6 times daily
6 times daily1
6 times daily
6 times daily3
6 times daily3
6 times daily3
None (proportion
of primary
secondary)
One Time Grab
One Time Grab
Composite Samples
3, 8-hr composites
24 hr
24 hr
24 hr
24 hr
24 hr
24 hr
N/A
N/A
Duration
7 days
days 5-7*
7 days
7 days
7 days
7 days
7 days
1 day
1 day
    'Volatile organic analysis (VOA) grabs only
    2Chlorination system was not operative day 1, and had chlorine leaks days 2. 3, 4
    •'Composited by laboratory

-------
At Plant B, seven separate waste
streams were sampled, as listed
in Table IV-2. As at Plant A. seven
days of sampling were
undertaken at Plant B to observe
variations over the course of a
complete week.

Each sample point that was
chosen best characterized the
wastewater at a particular stage
of treatment. An effort was made
to choose the sample points in
such a way that any extraneous
factors which might affect the
validity of the sample would be
eliminated. This involved
selecting sampling points that
allowed collection of samples
before settling, volatilization, or
contamination from other waste
streams could occur In instances
where more than one parallel
stream flowed through the same
treatment process, the sample
             was taken at the junction of the
             parallel streams if it was
             accessible  In all sampling, the
             EPA procedure for obtaining
             screening samples was used as
             the guide for gathering samples,
             and any deviation from the
             aforementioned procedure was
             documented.

             The individual sampling points
             used at Plant A and nature of the
             wastewater that was sampled
             were as follows:


             Plant A

             Influent

             Influent samples were obtained
             from one of four parallel flow grit
             chambers (usually only two in
             operation at one time) after the
             bar screens. The influent flow to
             Plant A was pumped to a wet
             well. Prom  there it flowed by
             gravity and was split into several
             parallel streams prior to passing
                          through the bar screens and into
                          the grit chamber. An automatic
                          sampler was set up at the grit
                          chamber (Figure IV-1) to draw
                          equal aliquots over the 8-hour
                          composite period during the first
                          week and over the 24-hour
                          composite period during the
                          second week. Tubing for the
                          samples was positioned inside a
                          fixed conduit which was mounted
                          to the safety railing around the
                          grit chambers in such a way that
                          the conduit could be adjusted
                          vertically to keep the submerged
                          end approximately one foot  below
                          the surface of the flow in the grit
                          chamber. The daily flow
                          fluctuations and the adjustments
                          and openings and closings of (he
                          other grit chambers would affect
                          the level of the flow in the grit
                          chamber from which the sample
                          was being extracted. Thus, to
                          keep the exposed end of the
TABLE IV-2.  SAMPLING FREQUENCY AT PLANT B.
Point
Influent
Effluent
before
Chlonnation
Final
Effluent
Combined
Sludge
Secondary
Sludge
Secondary
Sludge after
DAF thickening
Collection Method
Automatic Sampler
Automatic Sampler
Automatic Sampler
Manual Composite
One Time Grab
One Time Grab
Cn and Phenol
6 times daily
6 times daily
6 times daily
3 times daily'
One Time Grab
One Time Grab
Composite Samples
24 hr
24 hr
24 hr
24 hr
N/A
N/A
Duration
7 days
7 days
7 days
7 days
1 day
1 day
     Tap Water
One Time Grab
One Time Grab
N/A
1  day
     'Composited by laboratory

               8

-------
Figure IV-1.
          Influent sampling point
          at Plant A.
 sample tubing below the top layer
 of wastewater flow, the conduit
 was checked and adjusted, if
 necessary, at least once every
 four hours. Samples for the
 fractions that were not
 automatically composited were
 grabbed via a glass dipping
 pitcher at the sample midstream
 point where the tubing was
 positioned. Influent flow readings
 were supplied by the treatment
 plant after the sampling period
 was complete.

 Primary Sludge

 Samples for the primary sludge
 were taken from the main line
 between the primary settling
 tanks and the sludge conditioning
 system. Samples were taken
 every four hours for both the
 composites and the grabs, with
 the composite portion of the
 sample being held in a 3-gallon
 container and kept on  ice at the
 sample point. A sludge flow
 totalizer was located adjacent to
 the sample valve and provided
 sludge flow information for each
 sample period.

 Floatables (Scum)

 Thefloatables samples, which
 were taken from the primary
 settling tanks, represented the
 material which had been
 skimmed off the tanks and had
accumulated at the discharge end
of the primaries. These samples
were obtained by manually
dipping into this floating layer
each sample period.
 Secondary (Waste Activated)
 Sludge

 The secondary sludge samples
 were taken from a lift pump
 tower. This tower provided the
 only access point to the secondary
 sludge before it flowed (by gravity)
 to the DAF thickener. An
 automatic sampler was set up on
 this tower to obtain the composite
 samples. Totalizer readings were
 read at the secondary control
 building and were recorded for
 each sample period.

 Combined Sludge

The combined sludge sample was
 a flow-proportioned composite
 sample of the primary and waste
 activated sludges. A total of 1600
 ml of sludge was composited for
each 4-hour grab sample period.
The ratio of primary sludge to
 waste activated sludge was
determined by the flow rate of
each sludge during the preceding
 four hours. Each sludge allotment
was measured in a graduated
beaker and transferred to a 3- ,
gallon container for storage in an
ice bath for the 24-hour sample
period.

Pre-chlorinated Effluent

Samples of the pre-chlorinated
effluent were taken immediately
upstream of the chlormation
point. The chlorine is added to the
effluent stream underground, and
a piece of conduit was positioned
at the sample point with the
instream end upstream of the
chlorine contact point.
Chlorination facilities were not
operational during the first few
days of the sampling and,
consequently, no samples of The
pre-chlorinated effluent were
obtained until July 26. Once the
sampling was begun at this point.

-------
a small chlorine gas leak
developed, and it was judged
unsafe to enter the 10-foot access
hole to gather the grab samples.
To remedy this problem, an
additional sampler was set up to
collect the grab fraction samples
(volatile organic analyses—VOA's
only) from the stream and deliver
them to the surface

Final Effluent

The final effluent sample point
was located at the discharge end
of the chlorine contact chamber,
JUST prior to the overflow weir to
the river Composite samples,
where appropriate, were collected
with an automatic sampler,
 utilizing a conduit to fix the intake
tube's position.

 Vacuum Filter Filtrate

 One grab sample was taken of the
 vacuum filter filtrate from the
 vacuum discharge line in the filter
building. {All sample bottles were
filled as grabs at this one time.)
Each filling yielded approximately
250 ml of sample. No values for
the flow of this waste stream
were available.

Tap Water

A single grab sample for all
parameters was taken of the tap
water in the Plant's laboratory
sink The sample point was
considered representative of the
city water supply.

The individual sampling  points at
Plant B and the nature of the
wastewater sampled are as
follows'
Plant B

Influent

The influent sample point was at
the head end of the grit chambers
(detritus tanks). At this point an
automatic sampler was set up
with the sample tubing secured
inside a stationary conduit so as
to maintain the wetted end in a
position in the center of the
turbulent zone. This area was
subject to surges of wastewater
flow, and a secure placement of
the tubing was the only way to
obtain a representative sample of
the influent. The grab fractions for
the influent were obtained via a
glass pitcher which was dipped
directly into the wastewater. Flow
readings of the influent flow rates
were supplied by the treatment
plant after the sampling period
had been completed. Additional
parallel sampling at the sampling
point was done by another EPA
contractor who is also sampling
wastewater collection systems for
priority pollutants.

Combined Sludge

The combined sludge sample was
to be a flow composite of the
primary sludge and the secondary
sludge, but until the last day of
sampling, there was no secondary
sludge being wasted. Thus, the
sludge sample for the first six of
seven days was only primary
sludge, and the seventh sample
was  a flow-proportioned
composite of both the primary and
secondary sludges.
The primary sludge sample point
was a tap off of the sludge pump
which was used to transport the
primary sludge from the raw
sludge well to the sludge holding
tanks. The pumping of the sludge
was not a continuous operation
and required that samples be
taken during the three daily
pumping periods. The samples
were grabbed from the tap on the
pump (after an appropriate purge
time) after an initial startup period
of between  10 and 1 5 minutes
and before the end of the
pumping period when the sludge
would become too watery to  yield
a representative sample. The
primary sludge flow was read in
the sludge pumping building each
time a sample was grabbed.

The secondary sludge samples
were taken  only on the last day of
sampling, as this was the only
time during the 7-day sampling
period when any secondary
sludge was wasted. Two samples
of the secondary sludge  were
grabbed, one before and one after
the thickening process. With each
sample, an appropriate amount
(by flow) was composited with the
primary sludge sample for that
time period. The secondary sludge
sample prior to thickening was
grabbed as it flowed into the
holding tank (after pumping frcm
secondary clanfiers). The
secondary sludge sample, after
thickening,  was grabbed by
dipping into the surface  layer of
thickened sludge on the discharge
end of the sludge thickening unit.
No accurate flow measurements
of the flow of this secondary
sludge were available. Therefore,
an operator estimate was used for
the flow information.
                W

-------
                                                                  Pre-chlorinated Effluent

                                                                  The pre-chlorinatedeffluent
                                                                  sample point was located in the
                                                                  discharge trough of the secondary
                                                                  clarifiers after all the flows of the
                                                                  clarifiers had converged and were
                                                                  flowing to the chlorination
                                                                  chamber. An automatic sampler
                                                                  was set up at this point (Figure
                                                                  IV-2) to obtain the composite
                                                                  sample. The automatic sampler
                                                                  tubing was also secured with
                                                                  conduit facing into the
                                                                  wastewater flow. The grab
                                                                  samples were taken at the same
                                                                  sample point.

                                                                  Rnal Effluent

                                                                  Thefinal effluent sampling point
                                                                  was at the overflow weir of the
                                                                  chlorine contact chamber just
                                                                  prior to the flow into the
                                                                  discharge fiume (Figure  IV-3). The
                                                                  sample point was approximately
                                                                  20 feet below ground level, and
                                                                  samples were collected with an
                                                                  automatic sampler and a glass
                                                                  beaker dipping pole. As with the
                                                                  other automatic sampler points.
                                                                  the sampler tubing was rigidly
                                                                  held by a fixed piece of conduit
                                                                  facing upstream.

                                                                  Tap Water

                                                                  One tap water sample was taken
                                                                  at Plant B to obtain background
                                                                  information on the city water
                                                                  supply. The sample point chosen
                                                                  was the water tap in the sludge
                                                                  concentration tank's control
                                                                  building, which was being used
                                                                  as a staging area by the sampling
                                                                  crew. Each of the sample bottles
                                                                  was filled directly from the tap.
Figure IV- 2.  Prachtorinnad affluent sampling point PWnt 8.

-------
Figure IV-3.  Final effluent sampling
              point Plant B.

-------
V.   SAMPLING
 Sampling Frequency

 The sampling activities at both of
 the pilot study POTW's were
 scheduled over a 1 -week period
 so that information could be
 gathered on operational and
 pollutant loading variations on
 individual days.

 Sampling at Plant A spanned 14
 days. Saturday, July 22, 1978 to
 Saturday, August 5,1978, with
 the general all-points samplng
 taking place onlyduring the first
 seven days and sampling of the
 influent only during the second
 seven days. Similarly, at Plant B,
 the seven days of sampling were
 Sunday, August 6,1978 to
 Sunday, August 13.1978.

 To obtain a cross section of
 pollutant levels through the
 treatment plants, multiple  grabs
 were taken during each 24-hour
 sampling period (0800-0800). As
 a result grab samples were taken
 six times daily (1000,1400,1800,
 2200,0200, 0600).  During the
 second week at Plant A when only
 the influent was being sampled,
 grab times were moved ahead
 two hours to coincide with the 24-
 hour composite (0800.1200,
 1600. 2000, 2400, 0400).

 Sampling Techniques

Identical sampling techniques
were used at both POTW's
 throughout the study, and unless
 noted below, sampling protocols
developed by the EPA were
followed.
To obtain the most representative
sample from each sample point,
automatic samplers (Figure V-1)
were used wherever possible to
gather frequent, equal-sized
sample aliquots. This procedure
was only possible where flows
were continuous and accessible
to automatic sampling equipment.
At each POTW, the influent and
effluent streams were easily
accessible and could be sampled
at points where the flow was
representative of the total plant
influent and effluents, respective-
ly. On the other hand, a sample
point for primary sludge at Plant A
posed special problems where
waste flow was confined to a
pipe; thus, as a result, the only
feasible method for retrieving a
sample involved opening a gate
valve. Because the valve tended
to clog, repeated opening and
closing was required to avoid
backups or blockages. For such
sample points manual
compositing had to be employed.
Each sample point presented its
own peculiarities and had to be
handled individually. No single
standard technique coud be
developed to cover all sample
points under all situations.

Sample Collection Procedures

For those samples which could be
collected using automatic
samplers, tubing was changed
once per day. and sampler blanks
were run at the beginning of each
day's new composite. The
automatic samplers were
calibrated to pull sample aliquots
of at least 100 ml at time intervals
not to exceed 30 minutes.
Composites in the automatic
samplers were collected in 2.5-
gallon glass jars which were kept
in an ice bath at 4°C for the entire
24-hour period of sampling.
                                       3CK
                                                                               13

-------
Figure V-1.  Automatic Mmpt*r.
                                                                    For those composite samples
                                                                    which could not be gathered by
                                                                    automatic samplers, aliguots
                                                                    were taken with the regular grab
                                                                    samples and composited into jugs
                                                                    which were kept in an ice bath at
At sample points in the two pilot
study POTW's. except for the two
tap water sample points and the
vacuum filter filtrate sample point
at Plant A. the sample containers
were filled via an intermediate
gathering beaker of glass or
stainless steel. The intermediate
beakers were used to obtain the
most representative  sample.
while maintaining accuracy and
safety.  Safety was an important
factor,  since many sampling
points were constructed in a
fashion that precluded direct
collection of grab samples. Stain-
less steel and glass beakers were
used exclusively as the interme-
diate beakers because these two
materials are defined in the EPA
sampling protocol as having
characteristics such that they will
not contaminate the samples, nor
will they contribute any extra
pollutants by deterioration or
breakdown that might be detected
in the wastewater analysis. Each
sample point at each plant had its
own  beaker to eliminate cross
contamination, and each
sampling container was
thoroughly rinsed with new
sample prior to each sample
collection.
               14

-------
 At the two tap water sample
 points the flow from the taps
 could be regulated so as to
 facilitate direct filling of the
 sample containers. At the vacuum
 filter filtrate sample point in Plant
 A, the only way to obtain  a sample
 was off of the vacuum line. By
 inserting a plastic bonJe (which
 had been used repeatedly for this
 purpose) into an exposed air port,
 a disruption of the vacuum
 caused some of the filtrate to be
 deposited in the bottle. This
 plastic bottle was thoroughly
 rinsed with sample prior to each
 use.

 Protocol and Protocol
 Modifications

 Samples from  both plants were
 collected in accordance with EPA
 protocols, including the proper
 preparation of  bottles, the
 addition of prescribed
 preservatives and the collection of
 appropriate sampler blanks. All
 samples were shipped by air to
 the appropriate laboratories
 within  prescribed time limits and
 were analyzed  according to
 protocols for organic analysis.
 Metals from influent and effluent
samples were analyzed according
to protocols developed by EPA for
priority pollutants. Metals from
influent and effluent samples
 were analyzed by EPA's Region
 VII laboratory, using Plasma
 Atomic Emission Spectroscopy
 supplemented with flamsless
 atomic absorption spectrophoto-
 metry, where appropriate.
 Organic priority pollutants from
 influent and effluent samples
 were analyzed by an EPA contract
 laboratory utilizing liquid-liquid
 extraction and gas chromatog-
 raphy-mass spectroscopy (gc-ms)
 for the acid and base neutral
 fractions, electron capture gas
 chromatography for pesticides,
 and purge and trap followed by
 gc-ms for volatile organics. All
 sludge samples were analyzed bv
 the EPA contractor laboratory
 who developed some of the
 specific protocols for priority
 pollutant analysis of sludge
 samples during the study.
 Conventional pollutant analyses
 for all samples were performed by
 a branch office of this same
 laboratory in a different city.

The aforementioned protocol was
 followed as closely as possible
during the pilot study but, in
certain instances, modifications
were required to suit individual
sampling situations. Specific
 modifications to the protocol are
discussed below.
The protocol states that Teflon
tubing should be used on all
automatic sampler applications.
For this initial screening vinyl
tubing was used instead. This
tubing was thoroughly purged
with distilled  water prior to its
use, and a sampler blank was run
on each piece of tubing daily at
each site before the sampler was
started.

The method of grabbing samples
via an intermediate vessel is a
modification to the protocol for
fractions such as oil and greasa,
where the sample container is
supposed to be filled directly from
the wastewater stream. This
modification was made forsafety
and practical  reasons since
positioning of the sample
container into most of these
waste streams was either
impossible or very dangerous, and
the induced error through use of
an intermediate beaker was of
lesser consequence. In all cases
where an intermediate beaker
was used, it was used exclusively
at one point for the duration of
sampling at the plant, and it was
repeatedly purged with fresh
sample at each sample period.
                                                                                    15

-------
VI.   DATA SUMMARY
Major Trends

The priority pollutants detected in
the influents, effluents, and
sludges of the two pilot POTWs
are depicted in Tables VI-1 and
VI-2. These tables point out the
predominance of the solvents and
the phthalates in the influents. In
Plant A's influent, eight of the ten
most  prominant pollutants were
solvents, with only one phthalate
and phenol detected in more than
80 percent of the samples. In
Plant B, the smaller industrial
contribution is evident in that only
six of the ten most prominent
pollutants are solvents, with the
remaining  four being phthalates.
Phenol was not among the ten
most  common pollutants at Plant
B.

The sludge and effluent data in
these tables also show that many
priority pollutants are
concentrated in residues, while
others are  removed by different
mechanisms.
                                                                     The occurrence of selected
                                                                     conventional and priority
                                                                     pollutants in Planr A's influent.
                                                                     effluent and sludges  is
                                                                     presented in Section  VII. The
                                                                     organic pollutants with the
                                                                     highest concentration in the
                                                                     influent were benzene, 1,1,1  tri-
                                                                     chloroethane. chloroform, ethyl-
                                                                     benzene, bis (2-ethylhexyl)
                                                                     phthalate, tetrachloroethylene,
                                                                     toluene and trichloroethylene. All
                                                                     of these parameters were
                                                                     reduced by an average of 50
                                                                     percent or more during treatment,
                                                                     and all except chloroform were
                                                                     detected in one or more of the
                                                                     sludges. Metallic priority
                                                                     pollutants which occurred at
                                                                     relatively high levels  in Plant A's
                                                                     influent included chromium,
                                                                     copper, lead, nickel and zinc.
                                                                     These metals were all reduced at
                                                                     least 50 percent during
                                                                     treatment, and all were detected
                                                                     at high levels in both  the primary
                                                                     and secondary sludge.

                                                                     A data summary of the weekly
                                                                     average concentration of selected
                                                                     conventional and priority
                                                                     pollutants from Plant B is
                                                                     presented in Section  VII. No
                                                                     organic priority pollutant occurred
                                                                     at an average of over  20^ig/l in
                                                                     the plant's influent. The organic
                                                                     pollutants which were present in
                                                                     the highest concentrations.
                                                                     however, were benzene.
                                                                     methylene chloride, and bis (2-
                                                                     ethylhexyl) phthalate. Methylene
                                                                     chloride values must be viewed
                                                                     with some suspicion  since this
                                                                     substance was used as a bottle
                                                                     preparation additive.  Metallic
                                                                     priority pollutants which were
                                                                     present at over 50jjg/l in the
                                                                     influent included chromium,
                                                                     copper, cyanide and zinc. (For this
                                                                     discussion, cyanide has been
                                                                     classified as a metallic priority
                                                                     pollutant.)
                16
                                          33<

-------
                                                    TABLE VI-L
                                                     SUMMARY
                                PERCENT OCCURENCES OF ORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS
                                                     PLANT A
P    PARAMETER NAME

 TOLUENE
 METHYLENE CHLORIDE
 TRICHLOROETHYLENE
 rETRACHLOROETHYLENE
 CHLOROFORM
 9ENZENC
 3ISi2-ETHYLH,
 PHENOL
 ETHYLBENZENE
 1» Ir 1-TRICHU'
 t.l-DICHLOROI
 DI-N-eUTYL F'
 NAPHTHALENE
 1.2-rRANS-DI
 PHEfJANTHRENE
 SNTHRACENE
 OIETHYL PHTHALATE
 IfJ-DICHLOROBENZENE
 DIMETHYL  PHTHALATE
 5UTYL BENZYL PHTHAi
 1 ,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
 PYRENE
 FLUOREN6
 ?ENTACHLOROPHENOL
 FLUORANTHENE
 iiJ-OICHLOR08ENZENE
 1i1-DICHLOROETHANE
 CHLOROBENZENE
 CHRYSENE
 1r2-BENZANTHRACENE
 3ISC2-CHLOROETHYOX'
 CARBON  TETRACHLORIDE
 ACENAPHTHENE
 1.1.2-TRICHLl
 INDENOC1,2>3
 i,2:i.4-oiBEi
 1>12-BENZOPERYLENE
 ACENAPHTHYLENE
 DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
 HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
 CHLOROMETHANE
 1 > 2-DICHLOROPROPANE
 PARACHLOROMETA  CRl
 2.4ri&-TRICHLOROFHI
 HEXACHLOROBENZENE
 1,2,1-TRICHLOROBEi
 TRICHLOROFLUOROME'
 0ICHLOROBROMOMETHANE
 1 <2-[HCHLOROETHANE
 3.4-SENZOFLUORAffTHl
 CHLORODISROMOMETHANE
 2'4-OIHETHYLPHENCL
 J.J'-OICHLOROB!
 2-CHLOROPH6NOL
 ACRYLONITRILE

     NOTES:
4AME
*IDE
:NE
rLENE


n.> PHTHALATE


ETHANE
 7 7C100) 7
90)
S5'
73)
'41
74)
74 )
71)
"*1 )
42)
43>
33)
3S)
39)
331
2?)
29 %
2° '
24)
20)
13)
10)
10)
10)
10)
10)
7)
3)
5)
S)
3)
3)
3)
3")
S)
3)
3)
3)
3)
2)
21
2)
0)
0)
0)
0)
0)
0)
OTHERWISE
40
40
40
->-
7
40
7
7
i
7
7
7
7
7
•*
^
7
~
7
40
7
7
7
40
7
40
7
7
7
7
7
•7
40
7
7
7
7
7
40
40
40
7
40
7
7
7
40
SPECIFIED
PRIORITY POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED MERE NOT D6CTED
23 (
30 (
33 (
4
3
7
3
3
2
1
1 1
3<
2C
4(
1C
1C
~(
1 .
0(
1 (
1 1
1C
0(
0(
0<
0<
1C
1C
oc
0(
1 1
oc
' 'O'C
oc
oc
oc
oc
oc
2C
9(
0(
0(
2(
1(
1 (
1C
oc

IN
43)
75)
33)
57)
43)
19)
43)
43)
2?)
14)
14)
43)
29)
57)
14)
14)
43)
141
0)
3)
14)
14)
0)
0)
0)
0)
14)
14)
0)
0)
14)
0)
0)
0)
0)
0)
0)
0)
3)
23)
0)
0)
S)
14)
14)
14)
0)

ANY SAMPLES
7(
OC
100)
0)
SECONDARY SLUDSE
SAMPLES TIMES
ANALYZED DETECTED
(PERCENT)
7 2C 29)
7 7C100)
7 1( 14)
7
7
7(100) 7
6(
2C
36)
29)
•S
S
7 7(100) 7
7
7
-7
'
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
'
•"
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7


4<
2(
OC
SC
3 (
6(
a(
0(
0(
oc
1C
0(
•4C
3C
1 (
OC
0 C
4C
OC
4(
AC
OC
2(
0(
0(
0(
0(
OC
OC
OC
OC
OC
OC
OC
oc
OC
oc
oc
37)
2?)
0)
71)
43)
36)
86)
0)
0)
0)
14)
0)
96)
43)
14)
0)
01
37?
0)
96)
86)
0)
29)
0)
0)
0)
0)
0)
0)
0)
0)
0)
0)
0)
0)
0)
0)
0.)
7(100)
oc
SC
3(
oc
oc
oc
oc


0)
71)
43)
0)
0)
0)
0)


7
7
3
3
7
5
3
3
3
5
3
•3
5
3
5
5
•^
5
7
S
S
3
7
3
7

3
S
3
3
5
7
40

3

j
7
7
7
^
7
9-
5

7


S( 71)
OC 0)
4( 37)
2i 40)
1C 20)
2C 29)
0( 0)
OC 0)
0( 0)
1C 20)
OC 0)
2C 40)
2< 40)
OC 0)
oc o)
oc o)
oc o)
OC 0)
OC 0)
OC 0)
1C 20)
OC 0)
OC 0)
OC 0)
0( 0)
0( 0)
OC 0)
oc o>
2< 29)
oc o>
OC 0)
1C 20)
1C 20)
OC -0)
OC 0)
0( 0)
0( 0)
OC 0)
oc 0)
oc 0)
0( 0)
OC 0)
OC 0)
0( 0)
6C 96)
OC 0)
1C 20)
1C 37)
OC 0)
OC 0)
OC 0)
1C 14)


                                                 34<
                                                                                               17

-------
                                           TABLE VI-2
                                            SUMMARY
                       PERCENT OCCURENCES OF ORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS
                                            PLANT B
5-30-79
 PP    PARAMETER NAME

67 BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
66 BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
85 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
23 CHLOROFORM
44 METHYLENE CHLORIDE
70 DIETHYL PHTHALATE
6S DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
23 1.2-DICHLOROBENZENE
86 TOLUENE
 4 BENZENE
69 ni-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
65 PHENOL
55 NAPHTHALENE
84 PYRENE
81 PHENANTHRENE
78 ANTHRACENE
71 DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
39 FLUORANTHENE
38 ETHYLBENZENE
29 1,1-DItHLOROETHYLENE
87 TRICHLOROETHYLENE
11 1.1.1-TRICHLOROETHANE
64 PENTACHLOROPHENOL
54 ISOPHORONE
36 2-6-DINITROTOLUENE
27 1F4-DICHLOROBENZENE
26 1.3-niCHLOROBENZENE
10 1.2-DICHLOROETHANE
48 DICHLOROBROMOMETHANE
51 CHLORODIBROMOMETHANE
13 1r1-DICHLOROETHANE
 7 CHLOROBENZENE
32 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE
77 ACENAPHTHYLENE
76 CHRYSENE
74 3.4-BENZOFLUORANTHENE
72 1F2-BENZANTHRACENE
58 4-NITROPHENOL
57 2-NITROPHENOL
28 3.3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
 3 ACRYLONITRILE
INFLUENT
SAMPLES TIMES
ANALYZED DETECTED
(PERCENT)
6 6(100)
6
42
42
42
6
6
6
42
42
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
42
42
42
42
6
6
6
6
6
4
4
4
4
4
4
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
42
6(100)
41(
40(
39 (
5(
5(
5(
32 (
31(
4(
4(
4(
3(
3(
3(
3(
3(
18(
16(
14(
10(
1(
K
1(
1(
1<
5(
4(
3(
2(
2(
1(
0(
0<
0(
0(
0(
0(
0(
0(
98)
95)
93)
63)
83)
83)
76)
74)
67)
67)
67)
50)
50)
50)
50)
50)
43)
38)
33)
24)
17)
17)
17)
17)
17)
12)
10)
7)
5)
5)
2>
0)
0)
0)
0)
0)
0)
0)
0)
FINAL
SAMPLES
ANALYZED
8
8
41
41
41
8
8
8
41
41
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
41
41
41
41
8
8
8
8
8
41
41
41
41
41
41
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
41
EFFLUENT
TIMES
DETECTED
(PERCENT)
4( 50)
7(
23 (
38 (
39 (
3(
5(
3(
29 (
10(
1(
7(
3(
0(
0(
0(
2(
0(
2(
14(
1(
K
1(
0(
0(
0(
4(
6(
IK
IK
1(
0(
0(
2(
K
0<
K
2(
3(
K
0(
68)
56)
93)
95)
38)
63)
38)
71)
24)
13)
88)
38)
0)
0)
0)
25)
0)
5)
34)
2)
2)
13)
0)
0)
0)
50)
15)
27)
27)
2)
0)
0)
25)
13)
0)
13)
25)
38)
13)
0)
COMBINED SLUDGE
SAMPLES TIMES
ANALYZED DETECTED
(PERCENT)
7 0( 0)
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7(100)
6(
0(
66)
0)
7(100)
0(
0(
0(
6(
6(
0(
1 (
3(
5(
5(
5(
0(
0(
2(
0(
0(
0(
0(
0(
0(
0(
0(
0(
7(
2(
0(
0(
0(
0(
2(
5(
2(
0(
0(
0(
K
0)
0)
0)
86)
86)
0)
14)
43)
71)
71)
71)
0)
0)
29)
0)
0)
0)
0)
0)
0)
0)
0)
0)
100)
29)
0)
0)
0)
0)
29)
71)
29)
0)
0)
0)
14)
        NOTES:
                   ALL UNITS UG/L UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED
                   PRIORITY POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DECTED IN ANY SAMPLES
                                                 35<
               18

-------
VII.  ANALYSIS OF
      RESULTS
Fata of Priority Pollutants

Impact of Industrial
Contribution on Influent Quality

As previously outlined. Plant A
accepts a large proportion of its
total flow from industrial sources,
whereas Plant B treats practically
no heavy industrial wastewater.
Tables VII-1 and VII-2 summarize
the individual influent data points
for these two plants. An examina-
tion of the two tables shows a
Significantly higher incidence of
priority pollutants in Plant A as
compared to Plant 8. In total, 52
organic priority pollutants were
found in the Plant A influent,
while in the Plant B raw
wastewater only 33 were
detected. Similarly at  Plant A, 18
organic priority pollutants were
measured at above the detection
limit but at Plant 8 only five were
found at above detectable levels.
It was also found that Plant A
influent contained 21  organic
priority pollutants which were
absent in the Plant B influent;
only two organic priority pollu-
tants were found exclusively in
the Plant 8 raw wastewater.
Twenty orgamcs found in both
raw wastewaters had higher
average concentrations in the
Rant A influent, but only six
organic priority pollutants
common to both raw wastewater
streams were more concentrated
in the Plant B influent. It is also
interesting to note that 13 of the
20 organics found at higher
average concentrations in the
predominantly industrial Plant A
influent are solvents.
                                         36<
Nine metallic priority pollutants
were detected in the influents to
both plants. Seven of these were
found to have higher average
concentrations in both influents;
only zinc was measured at a
higher level in Plant 8, as
compared to Plant A influent. It
should be noted that the tradi-
tional (conventional and non-
conventional) pollutant
parameters (BOD, COO, TSS,
residue, etc.) were also
consistently higher in the Plant A
raw wastewater, as compared to
the Plant 8 influent.

Removal of Priority Pollutants

Tables VII-3 and VII-4 depict
percent removals for conven-
tional, non-conventional and
priority pollutants at Plants A and
8. During the week of sampling,
Plant A achieved good removals
of conventional pollutants. 800
was reduced from an average
influent concentration of 201
mg/l to 13 mg/l (94 percent) and
TSS from 140 mg/l to 20 mg/l
(86 percent). Priority pollutant
metals that were present in
detectable amounts were also
removed reasonably well.
Antimony, arsenic, beryllium,
selenium and thallium were
never found above their detection
limits in influent or effluent
samples and percent removals
could not be calculated.
Chromium and cooper both were
reduced to  less than 50jug/1 (90
and 86 percent removal, respec-
tively). Cadmium, nickel, and zinc
were removed somewhat less
effectively (59 to 65 percent sach,
on an average). Lead and silver
were both reduced to below their
detection limits, accounting for
the wide range shown in Vtl-3 for
their percent removals. Nine
organic priority pollutants were
detected in Plant A's influent at
an average of over 10^g/'l. Sight
of the nine (benzene; 1,1,1-tri-
chtoroethylene; chloroform; ethyl-
benzene; bis(2-ethyihexvl)

               19

-------
                                   TABLE VII-1
                     PERCENT OCCURENCES FOR PRIORITY POLLUTANTS
                                                     SAMPLE F-OINT:
5/30/70
PP PARAMETER
1 ACENAPHTHENE x
4 BENZENE
6 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
7 CHLOROBENZENE
8 1.2.4-TR1CHLOROBENZENE
» HEXACHLOROBENZENE
10 1.2-DICHLOROETHANE
11 1 . 1 .1-TRICHLOROETHANE
13 1.1-DICHLOROETHANE
11 1 . 1 .2-TRICHLOROETHANE
21 2.4.0-TRICHLOROPHENOL
22 PARACHLOROMETA CRESOU
23 CHLOROFORM
25 .2-D I CHLOROBENZENE
26 .3-DICHLOROBENZENE
27 f4-DICHLOROBENZENE
29 .1-DICHLOROETHYLENE
30 . 2-TRANS-DICHLOROETMYLENE
32 .2-DICHLOROPROPANE
38 ETHYLBENZENE
39 FLUORANTHENE
43 BIS(2-CHLOROETHYOXY) METHANE
44 METHYLENE CHLORIDE
45 CHLOROMETHANE
47 BROHOFORH
48 PICHLOROBROMOMETHANE
49 TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
51 CHLORODIBROMOMETHANE
52 HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
35 NAPHTHALENE
64 PENTACHLOROPHENOL
65 PHENOL
66 BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
47 BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
68 DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
69 DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
70 DIETHYL PHTHALATE
71 DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
72 1.2-BENZANTHRACENE
73 BENZO (A)PYRENE
76 CHRYSENE
77 ACENAPHTHYLENE
78 ANTHRACENE
79 1,12-BENZOPERYLENE
80 FLUORENE
81 PHCNANTHRENE
B2 1.2:S.6-DIBENZANTHRACENE
83 INDENOd ,2.3-C.D) PYRENC
84 PYRENE
85 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
86 TOLUENE
87 TRICHLOROETHYLENE
114 ANTIMONY
115 ARSENIC
117 BERYLLIUM
118 CADMIUM
119 CHROMIUM
120 COPPER
121 CYANIDE
122 LEAD
123 MERCURY
124 NICKEL
125 SELENIUM
126 SILVER
127 THALLIUM
NOTES: i> ALL
SAMPLES
ANAL YZED
28
82
82
82
2E
28
82
82
82
82
28
28
82
28
28
28
82
82
82
82
28
28
82
82
82
82
82
82
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
82
82
82
23
23
23
23
23
23
84
23
23
23
23
23
23
UNITS IN
-wunatK Uf— —
TIMES
DETECTED
(PERCENT)
21 7)
81 ( 99)
6< 71
91 11 )
1 ( 4)
1 ( 4 '
1 £ 1 )
71i 87)
19> 23)
3< 4)
11 4)
1 l 4>
79 ( 961
15( 54)
6'- 21)
1 4 ( 50 >
601 73)
69C 84)
2< 2)
75( 91)
8 ( 29)
2< 7>
82 < 100)
2( 2)
11 1 )
1< 1)
2< 2)
1( 1)
1 1 4)
23< 82)
71 25)
27C 96)
26 < 93)
11< 39)
19< 68)
1( 4)
I7( 61)
11 < 39)
S< 18)
1 ( 4)
5< IB)
11 4)
21< 75)
1( 4)
B( 29)
21< 75)
2( 7)
2( 7)
10( 36)
81< 99)
81 ( 99)
81 ( 99)













U6/L UNLESS
TIMES
DETECTED
ABOVE MIN
0< 0)
45( 55)
1< 1)
01 0)
0< 0)
0> 0)
01 0)
45( 55)
0( 0)
1 ' 1 )
0' 0)
0< 0)
67 ( 82)
0< 0)
0< 0)
0< 0)
5( 6)
18( 22)
0( 0)
281 341
0( 0)
0( 0.'
20 < 24)
0( 0)
0< 0)
0< 0)
0( 0)
0< 0)
0( 0)
1( 4)
0< 0)
9( 32)
14( SO)
1( 4)
1( 4)
0< 0)
0( 0)
0< 0)
0( 0)
01 0)
0( 0)
0( 0)
0( 0)
01 0)
0( 0)
0( 0)
0< 0)
0< 0)
1< 4)
S8( 71)
S6( 68)
49( 60)
OC 0)
O< 0)
0( 0)
21 ( 91)
23(100)
23(100)
57 ( 68)
16( 70)
1S( 65)
22 < 96)
0( 0)
18( 78)
01 0)
OTHERWISE
2) METALS AND CLASSICAL POLLUTANTS ARE
AVERAGE.
0- I
288- 292
0-
0-
0-
0-
0-
15-
1-
LT
0-
0-
43-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2 -
-
0-
e-
0-
0-
0-
0-
0-
0-
i-
i-
13-
25-
1-
1-
0-
1-
1-
0-
0-
0-
0-
1-
0-
1-
1-
0-
0-
3-
47-
35-
28-
1-
1-
1-
LT


124-
S5-
0.0-
LT
1-
LT
1-
NOTET
1
1
1
1
1
18
2
3
1
1
44
5
2
5
7
11
1
27
2
1
16
1
1
1
1
1
1
8
2
19
29
4
8
1
6
3
1
1
1
1
7
1
2
7
1
1
6
30
38
32
SO
50
2
12
450
191
128
61
0.3
98
SO
8
SO

NEWER REPORTED
MEDIAN
37











LT

LT
LT
LT

LT


LT






LT

LT


LT

LT





LT


LT






LT
LT
LT







LT

LT

AS MOT
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
10
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
21
10
N-D
5
10
10
N-D
10
N-D
N-D
10
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
10
N-D
10
5
N-D
10
N-D
10
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
10
N-D
N-D
10
N-D
N-D
N-D
16
13
11
SO
50
2
9
372
154
24
41
0.3
66
SO
9
SO

DETECTED
MINIMUM
N-D
N-D




















LT





























LT
LT
LT
LT


LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT


N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-t'
N-D
N-ti
N-D
N-[l
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
10
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-P
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
30
50
2
2
63
35
10
20
0.2
10
SO
2
SO


MAXIMUM
LT 10
5*00

LT
LT
LT
LT

LT

LT
LT

LT
LT
LT


LT

LT
LT

LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT

LT




LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT




LT
LT
LT







LT

LT


39
10
10
10
10
220
10
270
10
10
440
10
10
10
15
64
10
990
10
10
100
10
10
10
10
10
10
13
10
200
230
12
44
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
84
1SOO
440
440
SO
SO
2
39
1360
864
1280
216
0
347
SO
18
SO


        3) POLLUTANTS NOT  DETECTED ARE NOT LISTED
        4) PP - PRIORITY POLLUTANT NUMBER
          N-D - NOT BETECTEB
           LT - LESS THAN
                                             37<
20

-------
                                  PERCENT OCCU«NaSL™"«ORITr
                     PLANT
                             	—NUMBER OF—	
                             SAMPLES
                             ANALVZED
PP
      PARAMETER
    TIMES
   DETECTED
   .PERCENT)
                      TIMES
                    DETECTED
                    ABOVE MIN.
                                                             AVERAGE
 129 ZINC
    BOD(MO-L)
    COB(MG-L)
    TOC(MQ-L)
    OIL » GREASECNO-L)
    TOTAL PHENOLS
    TOTAL SOLIDS(MG-l>
    TOTAL SUSP. SOLIDS(MO-L)
    TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDS(MO-L)
    TOTAL VOL. SUS. SOLIDS<«0-L
    AMMONIA NITROOEN
    ALUMINUM
    BARIUM
    IRON
    MANGANESE
    CALCIUM(MO-L)
    MAONESIUM(MG-L)
                      MOTES:
                                                                          MEDIAN
                                           --18
                                           130
                                           433
                                           240
                                            40
                                                  LT
     23              23(100)          -44
     17              27(1OO>          213
     34              24<100>          -»31
     27              27(100)          203
     79              79(100)           4»
     S3              33(  99)     LT    129           <
     27              27(100)          939          970
     ^7              27(100)          175          130
     27              27 < 100)          232          240
     37              27(100)          113           39
     •*7              27(100)         '230         4300
     ^3              23(100)         1440         I'OO
     23              23(100)          129          131
     13              23(100)         2990         1770
     23              23(100)          104          107
     23              23(100)           33           97
     23              23(100)           27           29
1)  ALL UNITS IN UB/L UNLESS  OTHERWISE NOTED
-)  METALS AND CLASSICAL POLLUTANTS ARE NEVER REPORTED AS  NOT DETECTED
3)  POLLUTANTS NOT DETECTED ARE NOT LISTED
4,  pp - PRIORITY POLLUTANT NUMBER
  N-0 - NOT DETECTED
   LT - LESS THOM
  23
  32
 190
  39
  13
   6
 670
  77
 130
  36
3400
 243
  64
 404
  16
  33
  17
  503
  430
  630
  340
  340
 5200
 1300
  540
  940
  390
19000
 2420
  203
26000
  134
  102
  33
phthalate; tetrachloroethylene;
toluene, and tnchloroethylene)
were reduced by a minimum of 50
percent. Only phenol was not
effectively removed. Carbon tetra-
chlorideand 1,1.2-trichloro*
ethane were each measured at an
average concentration of several
micrograms per liter (yg/l) in the
influent, and were not detected in
any effluent samples, resulting irt
a computed 100 percent removal.
 During the week of sampling.
 Plant B achieved modefate
 removalsof BOO and TSS (74
 percent and 30 percent, respec-
 tively). The influent values for
 these para meters (95 and 97
 mg/l) were approximately half
 those of Plant A. Metals at Plant B
 occurred at relatively low levels.
 Antimony, arsenic, beryllium,
 selenium and thallium were not
 measured above their detection
 limit in either influent or effluent
 samples. Cadmium and silver
 were both reduced from several
l*g/\ to below their detection
 limits. Cadmium, copper and zinc
 were reduced effectively,
 between 69 and 81 percent. Lead
 and nickel were removed less
 effectively. Organic priority pollu-
 tants at Plant B occurred at such
 low average concentrations that
 percent removal data were not
 meaningful.
                                          Concentrations of Priority
                                          Pollutants in Sludge

                                          The concentrations of
                                          conventional and priority pollu-
                                          tants in primary and secondary
                                          sludge and floatables for Plant A
                                          are also indicated on Table V1I-3.
                                          Most of the metais occurred in
                                          high concentrations in both the
                                          primary and secondary sludge.
                                          Cadmium, copper, lead, nickel
                                          and zinc were each found  in
                                          primary sludge at concentrations
                                          over 100 times greater than their
                                          concentration in the influent.
                                          Alimony, arsenic, and beryllium,
                                          which were  never measured
                                          above their detection limit in the
                                          influent, were all measured  in the
                                          primary sludge. Chromium and
                                          cyanide were found in the primary
                                          sludge at 30 to  50 times their
                                          influent concentration. Chromium
                                          had a higher than expected
                                          concentration in the secondary
                                          sludge.
                                                  38<

-------
                              TABLE VI3-2
                 PERCENT OCCURENCES OF PRIORITY POLLUTANTS
                                              SAMPLE POINT:

            	NUMBER Of	
            SAMPLES    TIMES      TIMES
            ANALYZED  DETECTED    DETECTED
PF'
4
10
11
13
23
25
2c
27
29
22
Si-
SB
39
44
46
11
34
55
64
63
66
e*7
68
69
70
71
78
81
84
85
86
B7
114
115
117
lie
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128



















PARAMETER
BENZENE
CHLOROBENZENE
1 .,2-DICHLOROETHANE
1.1.1 -TPICHLOROETHANE
1 . 1-lUCHLOKOETHANE
CHLOROFORM
1 . 2-DICHLOROBENZENE
! , 3-D I CHLOROBENZENE
1 .4-IiICHLOROBENZENE
1 . 1 -DICHLOROETHrLENE
1 .?-IiICHLOROPROPANE
2.6-DINITROTOLUENE
ETHYLBENZENE
FLUORANTHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
DICHLORO BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROD I BROMOMETHANE
1SOPHORONE
NAPHTHALENE
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENOL
BISI2-ETHYLHEXYL ) PMTHALATE
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
ANTHRACENE
PHENANTHRENE
PYRENE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TR I CHLOROETHYLENE
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
THALLIUM
ZINC
BOD(MO-L)
COD(MG-L)
TOC(MG-L)
OIL 1 GREASE(MG-L)
TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS(MG-L)
TOTAL SUSP. SOLIOS(MG-L)
TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDSlMG-L)
TOTAL VOL. SUS. SOLIDS(MO-L
AMMONIA NITROGEN
ALUMINUM
BARIUM
IRON
MANGANESE
CALCIUM(MG-L)
MAONCSIUM(HO-L)
NOTES:


(PERCENT! ABtl'.'E M1N.
42 31( 74! 4( 1C)
42 2( 5) 0( 0)
42 3( 12) 1( 2)
42
42
42
6
£•
6
42
42
o
42
6
42
42
42
6
6
6
6
6
6
t
o
6
6
6
6
6
42
42
42
7
7
7
7
i
7
41
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
40
42
7
7
7
, 7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
1) ALL UNITS
2) METALS AND
3) POLLUTANTS
10( 24)

40 ( 95)
5< 83)

li 1"
lo. 38'
1 I ~" ^
11 17)
18( 43)
3< 30 >
39 ( C3;
41 10)
3( •»)
1 > 1"'
4( 67)
1 ( 17)
4 ( 67>
6 ( 1 00 '
6(1OO>
5< 83)
4. 67!
51 83)
3< 30)
3( 50)
3. 30)
3( SO)
41 ( 98)
32( 76)
14( 33)






























IN UG/L UNI
CLASSICAL
0' 0)
0( 0)
0< 0>
0( 0)
0( 0)
0( 0)
Oi 0>
01 0>
0' 0'
0( 0)
0' 0)
3< 121
0< 0)
01 0)
0( 0)
0( 0 )
0( 0)
0( 0>
3( 30)
0( 0)
0( 0)
O( 0)
01 0)
0( 0)
0( 0)
o( o>
O( 0)
0( O)
1( 2)
01 0)
0( 0)
0( 0)
0( 0)
6( 66)
7(100)
7(100)
34 ( 83)
2( 29)
3( 71)
7(1OO)
0( 0)
2( 2V)
0( 0)
7(100)
7(100)
7(100)
7 ( 1 00 )
40(100)
40 ( ?3>
7(100)
7(100)
7 ( 1 00 )
7(100)
7(1OO)
7(100)
7(100)
7(100)
7(100)
7(100)
7(10O)
.ESS OTHERU1
POLLUTANTS
NOT DETECTED ARE NOT
AVERAGE
7- 14
0- 1
0- 1
1- 2
0- 1
1- 9
1- 8
O- 1
0- 1
1- 3
0- 1
0- 1
1- 4
i- ;
6- 14
0- 1
0- 1
0- 1
1- 6
0- 1
1- 6
8- 14
1- 10
1- 8
1- 6
1- 8
1- 3
1- 3
1- 3
1- 3
1- 9
1- 8
1- 3
1- 50
1- SO
1- 2
LT 4
71
34
77- 78
16- 30
0.0- 0
30
1- SO
1- 2
1- SO
278
93
183
70
24
LT 20
619
97
143
34
11700
337
74
1640
280
69
15
[BE NOTED
ARE NEVER
LISTED
MEDIAN
LT 10
N-D
N-D


LT
LT






LT
LT



LT

LT

LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT

LT
LT
LT




LT
.3

LT
LT
LT


















REPORTED

N-D
N-D
10
10
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-Ii
5
10
N-D
N-D
N-P
10
N-D
10
1
10
10
10
10
3
3
3
3
10
10
N-D
SO
SO
2
4
67
55
66
20
0.2
31
30
2
30
302
96
180
69
26
12
610
87
140
42
11000
432
73
1370
271
68
14

AS NOT

MINIMUM
N-D
N-Ii
N-D


















LT
LT










LT
LT
LT
LT


LT
LT
LT

LT
LT
LT





LT












DETECTED

N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-fi
N-Ii
N-D
N-Ii
N-D
N-[i
N-D
N-D
N-D
10
10
N-D
N-D
N-Ii
N-li
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
30
SO
2
2
12
39
10
20
0.2
11
SO
2
SO
111
73
130
6t
S
1
310
33
88
27
9000
262
37
110O
235
67
14



MAXIMUM
260
LT 10
13
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT

LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT

LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT

LT
LT
LT
LT







LT

LT




















10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
180
10
10
10
10
10
10
19
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
37
10
30
50
2
9
131
72
240
79
0.
48
30
6
30
439
130
230
82
48
160
730
220
200
120
17000
1410
93
3610
334
73
16



4) ff - PRIORITY POLLUTANT NUMBER
N-D - NOT DETECTED


LT LESS
THAN








                                 39<
22

-------
TABLE VII-3
PLANT A
•DATA SUMMAftY-UEEK 1 AVERAGE
DATE
JULY 79
JULY 79
JULY 78
JULY 78
JULY 78
JULY 78
JULY 78
JULY 79
JULY 79
JULY 79
JULY 78
JULY 79
JULY 78
JULY 79
JULY 79
JULY 79
JULY 78
JULY 78
JULY 78
JULY 78
JULY 79
JULY 79
JULY 79
JULY 79
JULY 78
JULY 78
JULY 79
JULY 79
JULY 79
JULY 79
JULY 79
JULY 79
JULY 79
JULY 79
JULY 78
JULY 79
JUL/ 79
JULY 79
JULY 78
JULY 78
JULY 78
JULY 78
JULY 78
JULY 78
JULY 78
JULY 78
JULY 79
JULY 78
JULY 78
JULY 79
JULY 79
JULY 79
JULY 78
JULY 79
JULY 79
JULY 78
JULY 78
JUL r ?8
JULY 79
JULY 78
JULY 78
JULY 73
JULY 78
JULY 79
JULY 79
JULY 79
JULY 78
JULY 79
JULY 73
JULY 79
,-ULY 79
JULY 79
JULY 79
JULY 79
JULY 78
JULY 78
jULY 78
JULY 79
JULY 78
_ULY 79
JULY 79
-ULY 79
JULY 79
PP
1
4
4
7
9
9
10
11
13
14
21
23
24
23
26
27
23
29
30
32
34
39
39
43
44
43
48
49
31
32
33
44
43
44
47
48
49
70
71
72
74
77
79
79
30
31
32
33
34
as
34
37
114
113
117
119
119
120
121
122
123
123
•126
127
128










PARAMETER
ACENAPHTHENE
ACRYLONITRILE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
CHLOROBCNZENE
1 . 2>4-TRICHLORO>CNZENE
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
1.2-OICHLOROETHANE
1 . 1 , 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
1 . 1-OICMLOROETHANE
1 . 1 . 2-TRICHLOROETHANE
2 / 4 . 4- TR ICHLOROPHENOL
PARACHLOROMETA CRESOL
CHLOROFORM
2-CHLOROPHENOL
1 .2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1 .3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1.4-DICHLOROBENZENE
3.3--OICHLOROeENZIOINE
1.1-DICHLOROETHYLENE
1 , 2-TRANS-OICHLOROETHYLENE
1 . 2-DICHLOROPROPANE
2 • 4-0 IMETHYLPHENOL
ETHYLBENZENE
FLUORANTHENE
BIS<2-CHLOROETHYOXY) METHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
CHLOROMETHANE
DICHLOROBROMOHETHANE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROOISROMOMETHANE
HEXACHLQROBUTADIENE
NAPHTHALENE
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENOL
3IS<2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
BUTYL BENZYL PHTMALATE
DI-N-9UTYL PHTHM.ATE
DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
1 . 2-9ENZANTHBACENE
CHRYSENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
ANTHRACENE
I . 12-9ENZOPERYLENE
TLUORENE
PHENANTHRENE
1/2:S.4-OIBENZANTHRACENE
INDENO(1.2.3-C.O> PYRENE
PYRENE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
.ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
THALLIUM
ZINC
90DIHGM.)
COD < NO-L)
TOC(MO-L)
OIL t CREASE t NO-L)
TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS(MO-L)
TOTAL SUSP. 30L1BS
-------
DATE
AUG.
AUG .
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG .
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG .
AUG .
AUG.
AUG .
AUG .
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG .
AUG .
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG,
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.
AUO.
AUG.
AUG.
AUG.

78
78
78
76
78
76
78
76
76
7B
76
7E
76
-"a
^fc
'8
78
76
78
••8
76
78
7B
76
7£
76
76
78
76
76
78
78
78
78
78
78
76
78
78
-"6
76
78
76
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
76
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
Pf PARAMETER
3 ACCYLONITRILE
4 BENZENE
10 1 .2-DICHLOROETHANE
11 1 t 1 . 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
23 CHLOROFORM
23 I .2-PICHLOROBENZENE
2s> 1 .l-PICHLOROdENZENE
27 1-4-P1CHLOROBENZENE
26 3.3--DICHLOROBENZIDINE
2« 1 , l-PICHLORDETHYLENE
30 1,2-TRANS-PICHLOROETHYLENE
36 2,6-PINJTROTOLUENE
38 CTHYLBENZENE
39 FLUOKANTHENE
47 BRONOFORM
46 PICHLOF.OHROMOMETHANE
M CHLORODIBROMOMETHANE
54 ISOPHORONE
5" 2-NITROPHENOL
56 4-NITROPHENOL
e>4 FENTACHLOROPHENOL
60 PHENOL

70 PIETHYL PHTHALATC
71 DlnETHrl PHTHALJTE
7? 1 . 2-HENZANTHRACENC
74 3r4-fENZOFLUOKANTHENE
76 CHRYSENE
77 ACENAPHTHYLENE
78 ANTHRACENE
81 PHENANTHfiENE
64 PYRENE
83 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
86 TOLUENE
67 TRICHLOROETHYLENE
115 ARSENIC
117 BERYLLIUM
118 CADMIUM
119 CHROMIUM
120 COPPEF
121 CYANIDE
122 LEAP
123 MERCURY
124 NICKEL
123 SELENIUM
126 SILVER
127 THALLIUM
128 ZINC
BOD(MG-L)
COP(M6-L>
TOCCHG-L)
OIL 1 GREASE (hG-L)
TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS
TOTAL SUSF . SOLIDS(MG-L)
TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDS(MG-L)
TOTAL VOL. SUS. SOLIDS
AMMONIA NITROGEN
ALUMINUM
BARIUM
IRON
MANGANESE
CALCIUM(MO-L)
nAONESlUM(MG-L)
INFLUENT
N-P
0-
0-
-
N-P
N-P
*'-
o_
<~
«.—
o-
N-|»
N-li
I--]'
W-[l
o-
o-
f—
o-
) -
0-
0-
L r .0
4-
-J
54
T7-
16-
L u-3
30
0-
1-
o-
278
03
163
70
24
20
619
97
143
54
117OO
537
74
1*40
260
69
IS

I
2
10
e
2
2

4

-.
4
"~,

1
1
~


2
U
'f
e
'•j




5
5
3
10
V
3
30

5


78
30


SO
3
SO

















TABLE VII-4
PLANT I
DATA SUMMARY
EFFLUENT FINAL
PRE CL- EFFLUENT
N-P
L 2
1 1
L 10
L I
L 3

N-ti
L 2
0.3
N-P
I *• .'j

N-P
L 2
L r
N-P
L 8
L 34
L 4
L «•
L 1 1
L 7
L c
L 3
L 1
N-P
N-II
N-P
L 1
N-P
N-P
N-P
L 5
L 5
L 0.3
L 50
L 2.0
L 2
26
11
NOT RUN
L 23
L 0.2
21
L 30
L 7
L 30
83
20
32
2°
MOT RUN
NOT RUN
496
12

7
1830
74
36
198
194
64
14

L
L
L
L
L

L
L


L


L
L

L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L

L
L



L
L
L
L
L
L


L
L
L

L
L
L




L
L





L





N-P
.
0.5
10
4
f
N-P
1
3
N-P
N-P
1
N-P
N-p
3
3
N-L
4
14
1
9
Q
6
4
3
I
N-D
1
3
N-D
N-D
N-D
6
7
0.3
50
2.0
2
"•»
10
141
20
0.2
20
30
2
30
52
23
37
33
8
4
364
19
136
12
3300
54
23
iee
166
63
14
PERCENT
REMOVAL
N-P


0- 91





N-P



N-P






















33-100
69
81


S-10O
33

0- 84

81
74
69
33
66- 67
11- 84
9
80
3
78
72
90- 91
66
89
34
6
7
OS-'30/79
SECONDARY COM&INEIi TAF
SLUDGE SLUDGE MATER
N-D
N-P
N-P
N-P
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
N-P
N-P
NOT RUN
V
NOT RUN
N-P
35
N-tl
NOT PUN
NOT PUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT PUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
N-P
25
N-P
NOT RUN
-868.0
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
337
NOT RUN
MOT RUN
NOT RUN
MOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
MOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
MOT RUN
L 330
8
MOT RUM
NOT RUN
MOT RUN
MOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
MOT RUN
NOT RUN
41
N-P
N-P
N-D
N-P
N-P
N-P
N-P
N-P
N-P
N-P
~
N-P
N-P
74
c
W91
N-P
N-P
N-Ll
4
1490
N-P
N-P
N— p
N-P
N-P
8
43
8
N-D
91
91
43
61
336
N-D
39
149
L 12.0
303
8110
1070C
1690
7390
L 5.1
31OO
L 28
L 79
L 2
L 26700
8460
324OO
11900
3310
464
23400
21700
14300
12100
76900
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN




L








L






L
L
L
L
L









L

"










L

L
L














N-P
N-P
N-P
N-p
75
10
N-P
N-P
N-P
N-P
N-Ii
N-P
N-P
N-P
30
10
N-Jl
20
N-P
N-P
N-P
N-P
10
10
10
1C
N— I'
10
N-P
N-P
N-P
N-P
N-P
N-P
N-D
N-D
N-P
10
N-P
30
50
-'.0
2
5
6
10
20
0.2
10
30
2
30
7
10
1
22
7
6
30O
3
85
2
74OOO
108
40
108
3
40
9
DAF
BLANKET
N-P
1 0
N-P
N-P
N-P
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
N-P
N-fc
NOT RUN
10
NOT RUN
230
N-P
33
N-II
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
13
230
N-P
NOT RUN
-888.0
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
2870
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
1100O
2800
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
MOT RUN
NOT RUM
NOT RUN
HOT RUN
ALL UNITS  UO/L UHLfSS OTNeRUISE  NOTEt:  PP-PfllORITY POLLUTANT NUMBER:   N-P  WOT DETECTED:
MOT RUN  INDICATES SAMPLES "ERE MOT COLLECTED OR  D*TA MAS NOT BE£N  RECEIVED
PRIORITY  POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED WERE MOT DETECTED IN »MY S*MP1_ES
                                                                                                L-  LESS THAN
                    24

-------
 Several organic priority pollutants
 that were detected at very low
 concentrations in the influent
 accumulated in the primary or
 secondary sludge. Among them
 were acenaphthene(0 to l^ig/1
 average in the influent and 189
 jug/I in the primary sludge); 1,2-
 benzathracene (less than 1 and
 479); 3,4-benzofluoranthene (not
 detected and 675); fluorene (less
 than 3 and 313); and pyrene (less
 than 3 and 757).

 Data from Plant B indicated the
 same general trends (Tab(e VI1-4).
 Chromium, copper, lead, nickel
 and zinc were found in the
 combined sludge at approximately
 TOO times their concentration in
 the influent. Arsenic, cadmium,
 cyanide, mercury and silver also
 accumulated in the sludge, but
 occurred at overall  lower levels.
 Antimony, beryllium, selenium
 and thallium, which were never
 measured above their detection
 limits in the influent, were all
 found at concentrations below 50
fjg/\ in the sludge. Consequently,
 no conclusions regarding build-up
 of these metals in the sludge can
 be developed.

 Several organic priority pollutants
 present at very low levels in
 influent also were concentrated
 in the sludge. They  included
 acrylonitrile (not detected in the
 influent and 41 fjg/l in the
 combined sludge); dichlorobromo-
 methane (0 to 1 and 74); and 3,4
 benzofluoranthene (not detected
 and 43).
 Mass Balances

 Additional information correlating
 the influent and sludge concen-
 trations of priority pollutants is
 indicated in Tables VII-5 and VII-
 6. These tables show the
 approximate pounds of each
 pollutant present in the influent,
 effluent and sludge from Plants A
 and B, respectively. For Plant A
 there was moderately good agree-
 ment On the pounds entering and
 leaving the POTW for most
 conventional parameters and
 metallic priority pollutants.
 However, copper, lead and zinc
 balanced poorly. Most metals did
 show a tendency to accumulate in
 the sludge. The pounds of
 cadmium, chromium, copper,
 lead, nickel, silver and zinc in the
 primary and secondary sludge
 were each 2 to 15 times the
 amount calculated to be in the
 final effluent. An average of less
 than one pound  per day of
 antimony, beryllium, selenium
 and thallium was measured in the
 sludge of Plant A. Arsenic was
 detected in Plant A's sludges at
 over four pounds per day despite
 the fact that it had never been
 measured above the detection
 limit in the influent.

 For many organic priority pollu-
 tants, the mass balance data
 support the removal mechanisms
 of either oxidation, biodegrada-
 tion or air stripping. The most
 striking example is chloroform,
where none was detected in any
sludge samples, despite an
overall reduction from 37 to 38
pounds per day in the influent to
less than 16 pounds per day in the
effluent. Similar tendencies were
exhibited for other refractory but
volatile pollutants, such as
benzene; 1,1,1 -trichloroethylene;
ethyl benzene; tetrachloroethyl-
ene; toluene; and trichloroethyl-
ene. Organic compounds which
seemed to build up in the sludge
include acenaphthene; dichloro-
bromomethane; chlorodibromo-
methane; 1,2-benzanthracene;
3,4-benzofluoranthene; anthra-
cene; and fluorene.

Overall, Plant B had lower
concentrations of priority pollu-
tants than Plant A and the
accumulation of materials in the
sludge was less  pronounced. Of
the metals, only chromium,
copper, lead and zinc accumu-
lated to some degree in the
sludge, and all were present in
greater quantity  in the  combined
sludge than  in the final effluent.
There were insufficient data
upon which  to draw many
conclusions  regarding organic
priority pollutant removal
mechanisms  or accumulation in
sludges at Plant  B. No organic
priority pollutants were present
at an average of over one  pound
per day in Plant B's influent, or
combined sludge.

Mechanisms for Toxic Pollutant
Removal

Removal of toxic pollutants in a
POTW can occur as a result of
various physical, chemical or
biological  processes that take
place within the treatment
system. The  exact combination
of these phenomena affecting
any particular priority pollutant
depends largely on the  nature of
the pollutant  itself.
                                                                                  25

-------
»p    PARAMETER  NAME

  :  ACENAPMTHENE
  3  ACRYLONITRILE
  4  BENZENE
  6  CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
  •>  CHLOROBENZENE
  B  1,2.4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
  °  HEXACHLOROBENZENE
 1C  1 O-DICHLOROETHANE
 11  IT 1.1-TRICHLOROETHANE
 13  1 .1-DICHLOROETHANE
 14  1 T1.2-TR1CHLOROETHANE
 21  2 «4 .fr-TRICHLOF:L>f*HENOL
 2r h-AkflCHLOROMFTis CRESOL
 23 CHLOROFORM
 24 2-CHLORDPHENOL
 2i I.;-PICHLOROKEN;EHE
 lc 1.3-DICHLOROhENZENE
 27 1.4-PICHLOROBENZENE
 28 3.3  -D1CHLOROBENZIPINE
 29  1.1-DICHLOROETHYLENE
 Vj  1.2-TRANS-DICHLOROETHTLEWE
 32  1 .2-PICHLOROPROPANE
 }4 2.4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
    ETHYLHENZENE
    FLUORANTHENE
     KIS<2-CHLOM>ETHYO«Y>
    nETHYLENE CHLORIDE
    CHLnROHFTHANE
     UICHLOROflROnOMETHANE
     IHICHLOrVOFLUOROMfTHANE
    CHi.ORODIBROMOMETHANE
    HEXACHLOROKIITAHIENE
    NAF'HTHALENE
    F-ENT ACHL OROPHENOL
    PHENOL
    HS(2-ETHVLHEXrL' PH
    BUTYL  BENZYL PHTMALATE
    DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
    PI-N-OCTYL PMTHALATE
 70 PIE1HYL  PHTHALATE
 71 MMETHYL PHTHALATE
 ••2  1.2-HENZANTHhflCENC
 ->4 3,4-HENZOFLUORAMJHENE
 -o CHRYSENE
 7-» ACENAPHTHTLENE
 78 ANTHRACENE
 79  1,12-BENZOPERYLENE
 80 FLUORENE
 81 PHENANTHRENE
 82 1.2:3.«-DIBENZANTHRACENE
 83 INPENOU.2.3-C.D) PYRENE
 84 PYRENE
 BI TCTRACHLOROETHTLENE
 86 TOLUENE
 8- TRICHLOROETHYLENE
114 ANTIMONY
111 ARSENIC
117 BERYLLIUM
 18 CADMIUM
 1" CHROMIUM
 20 COPPER
    CYANIDE
    LEAH
    MERCURY
    NICKEL
    SELENIUM
    SILVER
    THALLIUM
                                                           TABLE VII-5
                                                             PLANT A
                                                           MASS BALANCE
                                                    yEEKLY SUMMARY (LB/DAY)

                                                             TOTAL OUT
                                                                                FINAL EFFLUENT  PRIMARY  SLUDGE  SECONDARY  SLUDGE





E












.-
IS
-%^
3

0.36
4.7
2 . e
0.72
N-D
0.72
0.36
5. 4
0.36
— n . 2
1.4
0.36
0.36
2.S
43
17
22
38
38
1.5
V.I
337
148
14
43
0.26
75
38
6.3
38

FLOWS (MOD):


0.46 -
0.035-
0.58 -
0 . OV9-




O.OA4-
0.029-



12
0
0
0
0
0
0.023-
0.062-

0
1
0

« .A

0.84
0
0.-

0.50 -
1.6
15
IS
0.001-
0
0
0
0
1.3 -
1.8 -
1.3 -

-.3 -

0.84 -
4.3
0.12 -
o.oro-
•> _
1.8 -
0.79 -
0.78 -
0.47 -
4.2 -
0.22
11
296
340
4. f
146
0.24 -
108
0.3 -
2.3 -
0.022-

IHFLUENT
PRIMARY SI
SECONDARY
0.46
0.03:
4.1
0.099
N-Ii
N-I>
N-n
N-ll
5.3
0.029
N-II
N-II
N-II
la
1 .
1 .
1.
•> t
1 .
•j.
1.
N-D
1.1
5.9
3.2
N-P
11
N-P
2. 1
0.37
0.4
N-D
3.8
2.7
19
18
3.2
4.3
1.1
2.1
1.1
2 .4
1.8
2.4
N-I<
7.5
H-D
1.9
7.5
1.2
1.2
6.3
7.5
7.3
7.1
38
41
1.7
11
2TS
339
11
161
0.34
107
38
3.8
37

_
.UOOE
SUWBE


L





L




L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L

L
L
L

L

L
L


L
L
.L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L

L

L

L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L


L
L
L

L
L
L

VI. 25
0.334
1.4?
N-P
N-P
3.5
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-rj
3.2
N-P
N-D
N-D
N-D
16
1 . 1
1.1
1.1
2.1
1.1
5.4
1.3
N-P
1.1
5.1
3.2
N-P
7.8
N-D
1.7
0.37
N-D
N-D
3.2
1.1
17
12
3.2
4.3
1.1
2.1
1.1
1.1
N-D
1.1
N-P
3.2
N-P
1.1
3.2
1.1
1.1
4.3
6.7
6.5
4.3
37
37
1.5
3.6
34
20
8
i:
0.300 L
30
37 L
1.3
37




0.44
N-D
0.46
0.039
N-D
N-P
N-D
N-D
0.0*4
0.029
N-D
N-P
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-P
N-P
N-D
0.023
0.042
N-D
N-P
0.740 L
N-P
N-P
0.6
N-P
0.15
N-D
0.046
N-D
0.53
0.21
0.25
6
0.001
N-P
N-D
N-D
N-D
1.2
1.8
1.3"
N-P
4.2
N-D
0.84
4 .2
N-D
N-P
2
0.790 L
0.77
0.770 L
0.390 L
3.4
0.1
3.3
39
209
1.700 L
126
0 . 008 L
36
0.028 L
0.068
0.006 L




N-D
0.031
0.12
0.07
N-P
N-D
N-D
N-P
N-D
N-P
N-P
N-D
N-P
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-II
N-D
N-P
N-P
0.044
N-D
N-D
3
N-P
0.48
N-D
0.36
N-P
0.049
1.4
0.83
0.51
N-D
N-P
N-P
N-P
N-p
N-P
0.001
N-D
N-D
0.054
N-P
N-P
0.054
0.12
0.0*8
N-D
0.087
0.026
0.009
0.27
0.77
0.12
4.2
221
110
0.91
20
0.031
41
0.28
2.2
0.016




                    26

-------



pp PARAMETER NAME

128 ZINC 1'
BOD(MO-L)
COD
TOC(MG-LJ
OIL I SREASE
TOTAL VOL. SUS. SOLIDS
AMMONIA NITROGEN
ALUMINUM
BARIUM
IRON
MANGANESE
CALCIUM
-------
                             PLANT B
                                                TABLE UIl-o
                                                MASS BALANCE
                                          WEEKLY SUMMARY (LB/DAY)
                                                                       5-30-79
»P    PARAMETER NAME

  3 ACRYLONITRILE
  4 BENZENE
  7 CHLOROBENZENE
 10 1.2-DICHLDROETHANE
 II 1-lr1-TRICHLOROETHANE
 13 1.1-DICHLOROETHANE
  3 CHLOKOFORH
    :.2-DICHLDROBENZENE
    1.3-DICHLOROBENZENE
    1 -4-PICHLOROBENZENE
    3.3--PICHLOROBENZIPINE
    1 . 1-PICHLOROETHYLENE
 31 1.2-PICHLOROPROPANE
 3t 2>e-PINITROTOLUENE
 2S ETHYLBENZENE
 39 FLUORANTHENE
 44 METHYLENE CHLORIDE
 48 PICHLOROBROMOMETHANE
 II CHLOROPIBROMOMETHANE
 34 ISOPHORONE
 55 NAPHTHALENE
 57 2-NITROPHENOL
 SB 4-NITROPHENOL
 64 PENTACHLOROPHENOL
 65 PHENOL
 66 BIS12-ETHYLHEXYL> PHTHALATE
 67 BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
 68 DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
 69 DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
 70 DIETHYL PHTHALATE
 71 DIHETHYL PHTHALATE
 72 1,2-BENZANTHRACENE
 74 CHRYSENE
 77 ACENAPHTHYLENE
 7B ANTHRACENE
 81 PHENANTHRENE
 84 PYRENE
 85 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
 36 TOLUENE
 87- TRICHLOROETHYLENE
114 ANTIMONY
115 ARSENIC
117 BERYLLIUM
118 CADMIUM
119 CHROMIUM
120 COPPER
121 CYANIDE
122 LEAP
123 MERCURY
124 NICKEL
125 SELENIUM
126 SILVER
127 THALLIUM
128 ZINC
    BOD(MD-L)
    COD(MG-L)
    TOC(MO-L)
    OIL  I BREASE(MD-L)
    TOTAL PHENOLS
    TOTAL SOLIBS(MG-L)
    TOTAL SUSP.  SQL1DS
    TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDS(MG-L)
    TOTAL VOL.  SUS.  SOLIDS(MG-L)
    AftMONIA NITROGEN
                                        INFLUENT
                                                          TOTAL OUT
                                                                            FINAL EFFLUENT  COMBINED SLUDGE
N-P
0.480- 0.910
0 - 0.032
0.021- 0.085
0 - 0.160
0 0.032
0 - 0.640
0 0.560
0 - 0.110
0 0.110
N-Ii
0 0.2oO
0 O.Olo
0 0.110
0 0 . 290
0 - 0.340
0.42O- 0.960
0 O.064
0 0.048
0 - 0.110
0 0.450
N-D
N-D
0 0.110
0 - 0.450
0.570- 0.910
0 u.670
0 - 0.560
0 - 0.450
0 0.560
0 - 0.340
H-II
N-H
N-D
0 - 0.340
0 - 0 . 340
0 0.340
0 0.660
0.059- 0.560
0 - 0.220
0 3 . 4OO
0 3.400
0 - 0.130
0.290- 0.310
4.8OO- 4. BOO
3.600- 3.600
5.20O- 5.300
1.1OO- 2.000
o.oi4- o.oie
2 . OOO- 2 . OOO
0 - 3.400
0.087- 0.180
0 3.400
19. OOO- 19. OOO
6370
12300
4710
1640
1.3
41700
6550
9610
3660
787
0.011- 0.011
0.16O- 0.280
N-D
0 0 . 098
0 0.033
N-D
0.056- 0.680
0 0 . 250
0 0.340
N-P
0 0.084
0 0.180
N-Ii
N-P
0.001- 0.050
N-P
0.0o4- 0.700
0.019- 0.230
0.002- 0.180
N-P
0.023- 0.280
0 - 0.250
0.84O- 0.920
0 - O.084
0.130- 0.720
0.380- 0.970
0 0.340
0 - 0.420
0 - 0.084
0 0.250
0 - 0.170
0.002- O.O60
0.002- 0.086
0 - 0.170
0.023- 0.023
0.023- 0.023
0.012- 0.012
0.016- O.440
0.087- O.SSO
0 - 0.016
0.010- 3.400
0.039- 3.400
0.003- 0.140
0.079- 0.210
3.600- 3.600
3.500- 3.500
9.900- 9.900
1 . 900- 3 . 200
0.001- 0.015
2.10O- 2.1OO
0.007- 3.400
0.049- 0.1*0
0 - 3 . 4OO
10.000- 10.000
3840
12200
S300
1460
0.4
44400
6910
12800
3900
242

L

L
L

L
L
L

L
L


L

L
L
L

L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L



L
L
L
L
L
L
L


L
L
L

L
L
L




L
L





N-Ii
0.270
N-P
0.096
0.033
N-P
0.680
0.250
0.340
N-P
0.084
0.180
N-P
N-Ii
0.04
-------
 A sometimes overlooked
 mechanism for the removal of
 inorganic priority pollutants via
 biological processes is the
 uptake of trace quantities of
 these pollutants as mtcronutri-
 ents. These materials may find
 their way into the biomass as a
 result of being complexed and
 incapsulated in a material that is
 consumed by cells.

 In summary, in terms of organic
 priority pollutant removal, the
 preliminary findings presented
 herein indicate that aside from
 standard physical and biological
 removal mechanisms, atmos-
 pheric stripping of refractory
 volatile organics appears to be a
 significant phenomenon.
 Aromatic volatiles, which are
 resistant to biodegradation, were
 removed from the treatment
 system, but not concentrated in
 the sludge. It appears, therefore,
 that these materials were air
 stripped.

 Polynuclear aromatics (PNA),
 which are also biologically diffi-
 cult to remove, exhibited a
 different fate in the two POTW's
 studied. PNA's are less volatile
 than the other aromatics on the
 priority pollutant list, yet these
 materials were removed.
 However, the PNA's were
 concentrated in sludges at the
 two plants. This seems to
 indicate that for these less
 volatile refractory materials, air
 stripping is not an  important
 removal mechanism.  Further
 evaluations of  removal mechan-
 isms will be earned out over  the
full 40-plam program.
Formation of Chlorinated
Hydrocarbons

At both POTW's sampled during
the pilot study, treated waste-
water was collected immediately
before chlorination and at the
plant outfall after chlorine
disinfection. Samples of the
chlorinated final effluent were
split creating duplicate aliquots
for analysis. One set was
analyzed as collected from the
outfall. The other set of samples
was preserved by adding
sufficient thiosulfate to consume
any residual chlorine.

The purpose of collecting dupli-
cate effluent samples, as de-
scribed above, was to study the
possible formation of chlorinated
hydrocarbons. If the preserved
sample was found to contain a
lower concentration of a chlori-
nated priority pollutant than the
unpreserved sample, it was
concluded that formation of
chlorinated hydrocarbons might
continue in the receiving stream
after discharge.

In Table VII-7 for Plant A and
Table VII-8 for Plant 8, summaries
of data showing the formation of
chlorinated priority pollutants
across the disinfection process
are presented. In total, evidence
of the formation of chlorinated
hydrocarbons was detected in 49
individual grab sample sets over
a 3-day period at Plant A and in
B9 grab sample sets over one
week of sampling at Plant 3.
By far the most common situation
was one in which the chlorinated
priority pollutant was not detected
in the pre-chlorinated sample but
was found at below the detection
limit in either Of the final effluent
samples, or both. Usually this type
of result would be considered
insignificant; however, since the
analyses presented herein were
compiled utilizing gc-ms, the
results obtained are meaningful.
With gc-ms, the identification of
an organic molecule is based on
an analysis of ion fragments
observed in mass spectra. If no
ion fragments for a particular
molecule at a specified gc
detention time are observed, the
result is reported as "not
detected." This is significantly
different from the results that are
reported at "less than 10." For
these analyses, some fragments
were found but not at proper
levels to assign a concentration
even though the material was
probably present. Therefore, for
parameters that go from not
detected to a value below the
detection limit, formation of the
chlorinated molecule may be
indicated.

The predicted higher chlorinated
hydrocarbon concentrations in
unpreserved samples as
compared to preserved samples
did not occur in a consistent
manner.'However, over the
course of the full 40-POTW
program it is expected that more
definitive data on these
phenomena will be developed.
                                              46<
                                                                                   23

-------
                         TABLE VII--1
                           PLANT A                     5-30-79
                   CHLORINE ON PRIORITY  POLLUTANT CONCENTRATIONS
                                          PRE-    UHPRESERVED PRESERVED
	 SAMPLE 	
KATE TIME
7-26-78 1600
•"-27-78 1UOO
"-2/-7B 1800
7-28-7B 1000
7-26-78 1400
7-29-7B 0200
7-29-78
7--7-?B
-2»-7e
~-2'-'e
--2> -78
'-27-78
7-27- 7e
7-28-7E
•"-2B-76
V-2b- 78
7-2B-7B
7-2B-78
7-29-7B
7-27-78
'-27-7H
'-27-'B
7-27-7B
'•-1B-78
--28-78
/-2B-78
7-28--"8
7-29-78
C.60O
0800
0800
0800
O800
14OO
1800
O6OO
lOOu
1400
1800
1800
0200
020  POLLUTANTS UHICH DID  NOT EXHI6IT INCREASED
                   CONCENTRATIONS AFTER  CHLDRINATION ARE NOT LISTED
                3)  PP - PRIORITY POLLUTANT NUHBEK
                   LT   LESS THAN
                  N-D   NOT DETECTED
             NOT APP.   NOT APPLICABLE ( EXTRACTABLE PARAMETERS)
Results of Sampling Frequency
and Sample Point Selection
Experiments

Through the first seven days of
sampling at Plant A influent
composites were taken every
eight hours, starting at 0800 on
Saturday, July 22, 1978 and
running through 0800 on
Saturday, July 29.1978. During
the second week of sampling at
Plant A the composites were
changed to cover the entire 24-
hour (0800 to 0800) period. On a
daily basis the averages of the
three 8-hour composites match
the corresponding 24-hour
composites. The composites
which end at 1600 and 1200 have
consistently higher loadings than
the composites ending at 0800.
This phenomena is particularly
evident in the metals
concentrations which exhibited
much higher concentrations
during the working hour
composites (0800 to 1600) than
during the other two 8-hour
periods. Table VII-9 shows this
phenomenon for the first week of
sampling at Plant B.

This phenomenon would follow
the diurnal variation in the
wastewater flow and the work
day of the industrial dischargers,
combined with the detention time
of the sewer system. This timed,
higher loading of the priority
pollutants, which were not
detected in the Plant B sampling,
is further evidence of the contri-
bution from the industrial
discharges which was present in
Plant A's system, but not in Plant
B's system.
                                                    47<
               30

-------
                 TABLE VII-
                   PLANT B
EFFECT OF CHLORINE ON PRIORITY
POLLUTANT CONCENTRATIONS
                               PRE-
                                     UNPRESERVED  PRESERVED
—SAMPLE 	
DATE TIME
8- 9-78 OOOO
B-13-78 0400
3- ,'-78 0200
3- ?-"3 1000
3-11-78 100O
3-11-79 08OO
-)- 3-79 0800
9- *-79 0900
9-13-78 OBOO
3-13-79 0800
9- 7-'8 0200
$-10-73 10OO
d- 1 o-">9 14OO
3-10-78 1800
3-11-78 0400
3-11-78 1400
3-11-79 2200
3-12-79 1400
3- a-. '3 1400
n- '-~a 0200
3- 3-78 1000
3- ?-79 1800
J- 1-79 J20O
3- 7-78 0200
3- -"-78 1400
3- 3-79 0400
3- 3-79 10OO
9- 8-79 1400
3- 3-79 1300
3-10-79 1800
9-11-78 1800
3-11-73 2200
3- 4-79 1000
3- a-78 14OO
1- 4-79 1800
3- 4- '9 2200
3- 7-79 0400
3- 7-78 1400
3- 3-79 0400
3- 3-78 1400
3- 3-78 1800
3-11-79 1800
1- 7-79 0800
3- i-79 1000
3- 5-73 1800
3- 4-78 2200
3- 7-78 0400
3- 7-78 1400
3- 9-78 [OOO
3- 3-78 1400
9- 3-78 1900
9- 9-79 1000
3- 9-79 1800
3-10-78 1400
3-11-78 2200
3-12-78 1000
3-13-78 0200
3- 7-78 0400
3- 3-79 1000

PP PARAMETER NAME
11 1,1.1-TRICHLOROETHANE
13 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
23 CHLOROFORH
23 CHLOROFORM
23 CHLOROFORH
23 l.Z-DICHLflROBENZENE
24 1,3-D1CHLOR06ENZENE
J4 1,3-OICHLOROBENZENE
24 U3-OICHLOROBENZENE
29 3,3--«lCHLOROBENZI»INE
29 . 1-OICHLOROETHYLENE
29 .1-DICHLOROETHYLENE
29 ,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE
79 . 1-OICHLCROETHYLSNE
29 .1-OICHLOROETHYLENE
2« 1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE
79 1, 1-OICHLOROETHYLENE
29 1,1-tllCMLClROETHYLENE
44 NETHYLENE CHLORIDE
44 HfTHYLENE CHLORIDE
44 METHYLENE CHLORIDE
44 (1ETHYLENE CHLORIDE
-18 DICHLUROBROrtOHETHANE
48 DICHLGROBRCmOnETHANE
40 DICHLOROBROHOnETHANE
413 OICHLOROBROnOHETHANE
46 OICHLDROBROnanETHANE
4d DICHLOROBRQnOMETMANE
48 DICHLORUBRanOHErHAHE
48 DICHLOROBRanOHETHANE
46 DICHLOROBROnanETHANE
48 DICHLOROBROHOnETHANE
=:i CHLOROniBROHOHETMANE
:i CHLORODIBROnOHETHANE
31 CHLORODIBROMOHETHANE
11 CHLORODIBROflOdETHANE
31 CHLORODIBRONOHETHANE
31 CHLORODIBROnOnETMANE
31 CHLQRODIBROnOnETHANE
31 CHLORODIBROHOnETHANE
31 CHLORODIBRONOHETHANE
31 CHLORODIBROHOnETHANE
44 PENTACHLOROPHENOL
3S TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
33 fETRACHLOROEfHYLENE
as TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
3S TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
31 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
9S TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
33 TETRACHLdROETHYLENE
35 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
35 TETRACHLQROETHYLENE
35 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
35 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
85 TETRACHLOROETHYLEN6
3S TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
85 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
37 TRICHLORQETHYLENE
37 TRICHLOJKJETHYLENE
NAT ED
FINAL
IENT EFFLUENT
N-D
N-0
N-D
N-D
10
N-0
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-0
N-D
N-0
N-0
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-0
N-D
N-D
N-0
N-D
N-0
N-0
N-0
N-D
N-D
N-0
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-0
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-0
N-0
N-D
N-0
N-D
N-D
N-0
N-0
N-0
N-D
N-0
N-D
N-0
N-D
N-0
N-O

LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT


LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT


LT
LT
LT
LT


LT

LT

LT

LT
LT
LT
LT

LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
Lf
LT
LT
LT
LT





LT
N-0
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
N-D
N-0
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
19
N-D
N-Ci
10
10
10
10
N-0
N-0
10
N-D
10
N-D
10
N-D
10
10
10
10
N-D
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
N-0
N~0
N-0
N-0
N-0
10
FINAL
EFFLUENT
LT 10
N-D
LT 10
LT 10
3*
NOT APP.
NOT APP.
NOT APP.
NOT APP.
NOT APP.
LT 10
LT 10
LT 10
LT 10
LT 10
LT 10
LT 10
LT 10
LT 10
LT 10
LT 10
LT 10
LT 10
LT 10
LT 10
LT 10
N-0
LT 10
LT 10
LT 10
•.. N-0
LT 10
LT 10
LT 10
N-0
LT 10
LT 10
LT 10
LT 10
LT 10
LT 10
N-0
NOT APP.
LT 10
N-0
LT 10
LT 10
N-0
LT 10
LT 10
N-0
LT 10
N-0
LT 10
LT 10
LT 10
LT 10
LT 10
N-0
Unless diurnal variation and the
effect of sewer detention time are
to be subjects of further study, the
additional sampling effort and
analysis expense to do three or
more complete sets of composites
per day do not seem to be
warranted. Satisfactory results
may be obtained with a daily
composite.

Variation Between Various Days
of the Week

The presence of and variation in
influent pollutant concentrations
over the weekly  sampling period
showed a few general trends. At
Plant A the priority pollutant
metals, especially chromium,
copper and nickel, showed a
marked increase during the
middle and latter pans of the
Monday-Friday work week, and
their concentrations dipped
during the non-working day
composites. The same general
trend with the metals was noticed
at Plant B, but with the smaller
industrial contribution and the
smaller wastewater flow, the
concentrations were not as large,
and similarly, the variations not
as pronounced.

A general trend  for the
conventional parameters (BOO
and TSS) was not established at
either of the pilot plants. Both of
the aforementioned conventional
pollutants fluctuated up and down
throughout the 2-week period at
Plant A and the  1 -week period in
Plant 8 to such an extent that no
meaningful conclusions could be
drawn on the daily conventional
pollutant variation.
   ES: 1) ALL UNITS IK Ufl/L UNLESS OTHERylSE NOTED
      2> POLLUTANTS UHICH DID NOT EXHIBIT INCREASED
        CONCENTRATIONS AFTER CHLORINATION ARE NOT LISTED
      3> PP - PRIORITY POLLUTANT NUflBER
        LT - LESS THAN
       N-0 - NOT DETECTED
   NOT APP. - NOT APPLICABLE (  EXTRACT ABLE PARAMETERS)
                                                                           31

-------
TABLE VII-9   8-HOUR COMPOSITES VS. METALS CONCENTRATIONS1

Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc

Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
'All units jjg/l
2Bottle broken
3LT = less than
July
0800
LT23
76
35
LT20
LT10
23
July
0800
6
361
101
LT20
27
149


20 — July 23
1600 2400
7 5
151 133
228 94
LT20 LT20
39 32
1 24 116
26 — July 27
1600 24002
30
1025
333
110
273
473


July 23 — July 24
0800 1600* 2400*
9
63
70
32
19
303
July 27 — July 28
0800 1 600 2400
9 22 12
321 870 364
152 207 119
LT20 117 21
20 269 54
303 362 347


July 24 — July 25 July 25 — July 26
0800
LT2
100
105
LT20
31
135
July 28
0800
9
372
157
33
75
197


1600
6
884
267
139
260
162
2400 0800 1 600
3 8 13
139 428 1360
128 154 864
LT20 41 216
43 39 347
379 1 90 503
24OO
11
563
205
29
66
223
— July 29
1600
39
455
154
44
63
345


2400
18
311
120
86
98
204











Due to the very low
concentrations of the organics in
most of the samples, little correla-
tion on a daily basis could be
drawn from the organic results.
The variation of toluene during
the first week at Plant A showed
increased concentrations during
the work week, but during the
second week, this trend was not
shown. With the majority of the
analytical results reported as less
than 10fjg/\ for these organics,
there would have to be a very
heavy organics discharger to the
system on a regular basis for
these organic results to show any
kind of a trend worthy of definitive

               32
conclusions. The one organic
pollutant which did show up with
values consistently above the
detection limit was chloroform,
with a trend toward higher values
at the end of each sample week at
Plant A (except for the composite
ending on Thursday each week).
The values for chloroform in Plant
B were always below the detec-
tion limit so a similar comparison
could not be made.
Therefore, as discussed above, it
is apparent that day-by-day
differences may be more readily
apparent in treatment facilities
with larger industrial contribu-
tors, and the amounts of the
priority pollutants which are
being contributed by the residen-
tial contributors are small enough
to be diluted  below the detection
concentrations by the time they
reach the treatment plants.
Source sampling at industrial
dischargers  and selected
sampling under controlled condi-
tions (i.e., new sewer, little
groundwater inflow, etc.) of
                 49<

-------
 totally residential areas, may yield
 trends for those priority pollutants
 which are introduced into sewers.

 Potential of Additional Sample
 Points

 During the first week of sampling
 at Plant A and the week at.Plant
 3, certain additional points were
 sampled to scan for priority
 pollutant levels which might
 impact mass balances calculated
 for these or future plants. In addi-
 tion, certain other waste streams,
 should they be accessible, may
 yield sufficient information to
 warrant future sampling.

 Sludge Dewatering/Tnickening
 Recycle Streams

 This waste stream is usually
 readily accessible in the sludge
 handling system of each POTW
 and can be sampled to obtain an
 indication of the level of pollu-
 tants which are recycled for
 further biological treatment.
 Samples of the filtrate at Plant A
 show that the priority pollutant
 concentrations in these streams
 are generally of such small
 magnitude that they do not
 warrant the effort in obtaining
 them.

 If this type of waste stream is
 recycled in such a way so as to,
 affect another sample point,
 background sampling should be
 practiced,  on a case-by-case basis
 only, to provide a total picture of
the flow of priority pollutants
through the POTW
 Floatable
The pollutant levels in the float-
ables samples taken at Plant A
and the corresponding sludge
concentrations correlate reason-
ably well. However, since the
volume of floatables removed
from the wastewater is very small
when compared to the sludge
volumes, additional samples of
this type are not deemed neces-
sary.

Primary Effluent

One of the principal goals of the
40-plant sampling effort is to
determine the fate of priority
pollutants by calculating mass
balances. A more accurate calcu-
lation can be made if all factors
are expressed in the same terms
(i.e.. liquid flow in  mg/l rather
than solids in mg/kg). To
accurately calculate mass
balances through the primary
treatment process, a sample point
in the primary effluent will be
needed.
 Tap Water

 The tap water sample is a neces-
 sary background sample which
 should be obtained at each POTW
 so that a total understanding of
 what pollutants are already in the
 water prior to its use may be
 ascertained.

 Effluent Before Chlorination

 Since the use of chlorine as a
 disinfecting agent has been
 questioned because of the
 possible formation of chlorinated
 hydrocarbons, the collection of
 effluent before chlori nation could
 offer a means of obtaining valua-
 ble information. Should a
 chlorinated hydrocarbon be
 detected in ail the samples
 throughout the POTW (influent,
 sludges, effluent), its fate would
 still be in question as to  whether
 it was removed in any of the treat-
 ment processes or if it was
 generated in the disinfection
 process. This doubt on the fate of
 such compounds would be
 resolved should the wastewater
 be sampled both before and after
 chlorination.

 Digester Supernatant/ Heat
 Treatment Recycle Streams

 Both of these waste streams are
 concentrated flows which are
 liable to contain very high con-
 centrations of conventional, non-
 conventional and selected priority
 pollutants. Neither of these
streams was sampled at either of
 the pilot plants, but each could
yield valuable data on the
processes involved and how they
impact the fate of priority pollu-
 tants in POTW's.
           T ul GOVWWWTWWTMCOWICtan -
                                                                                   33

-------
 Water                                   EPA^440/1-30- 301
 Fate of Priority
 Pollutants  in
 Publicly Owned
 Treatment Works

 Interim Report
by
Howard Feiler, P.E.
Burns and Roe Industrial Services Corporation
650 Winters Avenue
Paramus, New Jersey 07652
Program Manager
Thomas P. O'Farrell
Project Officers
Robert M. Southworth, P.E.
Arthur E. Shattuck
Effluent Guidelines Division
Water Regulations and Standards
Office of Water and Waste Management
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Washington DC 20460

-------
                                DISCLAIMER


The purpose of this interim report is to present  the  data  from the first 20
cities in EPA's study to sample and analyze  for the  129 priority pollutants
at POTWs  in  40 cities.  Although  the  report includes  a summary of conclu-
sions, the  reader  should be informed that  these  are preliminary and based
on only  one-half  of the data.   Final  conclusions will  be  presented in the
final report based on the data from 40 cities.
                                   ii

-------
                            TABLE OF CONTENTS


Section

  I      Summary and Preliminary Conclusions                          1
              Summary                                                 *•
              Preliminary Conclusions                                 2

 II      Introduction                                                 3
              Background                                              3
              Purpose                                                 3

III      POTW Selection                                               <*
              Selection Criteria                                      4
              POTW Characteristics                                    5

 IV      Sampling                                                    16
              Sampling Frequency                                     16
              Sampling Techniques                                    16
              Sample Points                                          17

  V      Data                                                        24
              Overall POTW Data                                      24

 VI      Evaluation of Analytical Results                            35
              Impact of Industrial  Contribution on                   35
                 Influent Quality
              Treatment or Removal  of Priority                       35
                 Pollutants in  POTW's
              Reduction of Priority Pollutants by                    39
                 POTW Treatment  Processes
              POTW Priority Pollutant Mass Balances                  39
              Daily Variation  of  Influent Pollutant                  42
                 Concentrations
              Effect of Rainfall                                     42
              Formation of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons                  45
              Pollutants Detected in Sludges When                    45
                 Not Measured  in the Influent
              Correlation of  Influent and Effluent                   48
                 Concentrations


APPENDIX A - CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION CURVES                          50

         Figure  A-l (Benzene,  1,1,1-Trichloroethane                  50
           Chloroform)

         Figure  A-2 (1,2 trans-Oichloroethylene,                     51
         Ethylbenzene, Methylene Chloride)

         Figure  A-3 (Tetrachloroethylene, Toluene,                   52
           Trichloroetnylene)

                                  iii

-------
                   TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont'd)

Section
         Figure A-4 (Phenol, Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)                        53
           Phthalate, Naphthalene)
         Figure A-5 (Butyl Benzyl Phthalate,                          54
           Di-N-Butyl Phthalate, Diethyl Phthalate)
         Figure A-6 (Cadmium, Chromium, Copper)                       55
         Figure A-7 (Cyanide, Lead  Mercury)                          56
         Figure A-8 (Nickel, Silver, Zinc)                            57

APPENDIX B - ANALYTICAL DATA RESULTS                                  58
             Summary, Mass Balance,  Percent Occurrence
             of Pollutant Parameters (Plants 1 through 20-)
                                    'j
                                  54 <

-------
                                LIST OF TABLES


Table No.                  Title                                    Page

  1      POTW Characteristics                                         6

  2      Summary of Number of Samples Taken at Each                 18
         Plant

  3      Occurrence of Priority Pollutants in POTW                  25
         Influent Samples

  4      Occurrence of Priority Pollutants 1n POTW                  29
         Secondary Effluent  Samples

  5      Occurrence of Priority Pollutants in POTW                  32
         Raw  Sludge Samples

  6      Summary of Percent  Removals Achieved by                    37
         Secondary Treatment

  7      Reduction of Conventional and  Priority                     40
         Pollutants by POTW  Treatment Processes

  8      Mass  Balance Summary                                       41

  9      Daily  Average Concentrations of Pollutants                 43
         in POTW Influents

  10      Effect of Rainfall  on Influent Metals Loading              44

  11      Formation of Chlorinated  Hydrocarbons During               46
         Chlorine Disinfection

  12      Summary of Priority Pollutant  Occurrence  in                47
         Sludge When Not Detected  in Influent

  13      Correlation of  Influent and Effluent                       49
         Concentration
                                LIST OF FIGURES

Figure No.                   Title

  1      Correlation  of  Influent  Total Metals                        36
         Concentration to  Percent  Industrial Flow

  2      Cumulative Distribution  Curves                              38
                                55<

-------
                             ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The  Environmental  Protection  Agency personnel  contributing  to this effort
were  Project  Officer,  Robert M. Southworth,  Effluent Guidelines Division;
Program  Manager,  Thomas  P.  O'Farrell,  Office  of  the Deputy  Assistant
Administrator  for  Water  Regulations  and  Standards;  and   former  Project
Officers,  Arthur E. Shattuck,  Effluent Guidelines  Division, and  R.  Dean
Jarman,  Office  of  Research   and   Development,   Center  for  Environmental
Research Information.

Additionally,  we   gratefully  acknowledge   the   following   Environmental
Protection  Agency  personnel  for  their  valuable  assistance  and  guidance:
Robert  B.   Schaffer,  Director, Effluent Guidelines  Division; Jeffery  D.
Denit,  Deputy  Director, Effluent  Guidelines  Division;  and  John  E. Riley,
Branch Chief, Effluent Guidelines  Division.

Acknowledgement  'is  also   made  to Burns   and  Roe  Industrial    Services
Corporation, Paramus, New Jersey,  the  EPA  contractor for the project.  The
following members of the technical  staff made significant contributions to
the  overall  project  effort  and execution of  the  sampling  program:   Howard
D. Feiler,  Paul  J. Storch,  Henry M.  Celestino,  Gary C. Martin, and Mark V.
Sadowski.
                                     vi

-------
                                     I.

                         SUMMARY AND PRELIMINARY
                               CONCLUSIONS
SUMMARY
In 1978,  the  United  States Environmental Protection Agency  (EPA)  initiated
a program to  study the occurrence  and  fate of the 129 priority  pollutants
in 40  Publicly  Owned  Treatment Uorlcs  (POTW's).   The  first phase of  this
work was  a two-plant pilot  study  designed  to set operating  parameters  for
the  remainder  of  the  40 POTW  study.    In  October  1979,  EPA's  Effluent
Guidelines  Division  published  a  report summarizing  the  findings of  the
pilot  study work:   "Fate  of  Priority Polluants in Publicly  Owned  Treatment
Works-Pilot Study" (EPA-440/1-79-300).

In this  Interim report,  data from the two  pilot  study  POTW's plus  18  addi-
tional POTW's  are  presented.  All  20  plants provided a  minimum of  secondary
treatment.  At most  of these  20  plants, a  minimum of  six  days of 24  hour
sampling  of  influent,  effluent,  and sludge streams  was  completed.    Each
sample  was   analyzed   for  conventional,   selected  non-conventional,   and
priority  pollutants.

Beyond presenting  the occurrence  and concentration  of priority  pollutants
in the 20 POTW's other specific  phenomena  and relationships  are  evaluated
in this report.  These  items include:

    o     Impact  of industrial contribution  on  influent  quality.

    o     Treatment or removal of priority pollutants in POTW's.

    o     Reduction of priority pollutants by POTW  treatment  processes.

    o     POTW  priority pollutant mass balances.

    o     Daily  variation  of  influent  priority  pollutant concentration.

    o     Effect  of rainfall on priority  pollutant  levels  in  POTW  influents.

    o    Formation of  chlorinated  hydrocarbons   during  chlorine  disinfec-
         tion.

    o    Quantification of pollutants found in sludges, but  not  detected  in
         POTW   influents.

    o    Correlation  of influent to effluent  priority pollutant  levels.

-------
                          PRELIMINARY  CONCLUSIONS


 1.   A total  of 93 priority  pollutants  were detected at  least  once  in POTW
     influents.

 2.   In general,  the  higher  the  industrial  contribution  to  a  POTW,  the
     higher the concentration  of metallic  priority  pollutants  in the POTW
     influent.

 3.   Based  on  the 20  POTW  data  base,  50  percent  of  secondary  treatment
     plants  achieved   at  least  76  percent  reduction  of  total   priority
     pollutant  metals,  85  percent  reduction  of  total  volatile priority
     pollutants,   and  70  percent  reduction  of  total   acid-base-neutral
     priority pollutants.

 4.   Tertiary treatment   processes   reduced priority   pollutants   slightly
     better than  secondary processes.   Primary treatment  was  less  effective
     that  either  secondary  or  tertiary  processes.   Activated sludge  and
     trickl'ing  filter  processes  were about equally effective  in  reducing
     priority pollutants.

 5.   Metallic priority pollutant  mass  balance  was  good,  but  some  organic
     priority pollutants  in the  influent were always  not accounted  for  in
     the effluent  or sludges.  This indicates that, in  general,  a  portion  of
     organic  priority  pollutants  are   biodegraded  or,   in  the   case  of
     volatiles, stripped out of the wastewater.

 6.   The mass loading of priority pollutants in POTW  influents was  higher  on
    weekdays than on weekends.

 7.   Heavy  rainfall  increased metallic  priority pollutant  mass loading  at
    POTW's with combined sewer collection systems.

 8.  Certain  priority  pollutant   chlorinated  hydrocarbons  increased  in
    concentration during chlorine disinfection.

9.  Some pollutants  not measured  in  POTW influents  were  regularly measured
    at high  levels in the corresponding  sludge streams.

10.  For  many  conventional   and  priority  pollutants,   as   influent  con-
    centrations increased, effluent concentrations also increased.

-------
                                    II.

                                INTRODUCTION
BACKGROUND
Priority pollutants enter  navigable  waters  from  a  variety  of point and non-
point  sources.    Prior  to the  initiation  of  this project,  only  scattered
data existed  on  the  impact,  occurrence, and removal  of  toxic pollutants in
POTW's.    Very  little  was  known  about  the  quantity  of  toxic  pollutants
entering receiving streams from  POTW's  or the  ability of POTW's  to treat or
remove toxic  pollutants.

In  this  Interim  Report, data obtained at the  midpoint  of  the 40 POTW study
are  presented.   A total  of 632  samples  were collected  to  make  up  the 20
plant  data base.  Each sample was  analyzed  for  conventional and selected
non-conventional  pollutants, as  well as  129 organic  and  inorganic priority
pollutants.   The  preliminary findings presented in the  Interim  Report and,
to  an even  larger extent,  the  final  conclusions  for the  full  40  plant study
will provide  valuable  insights  into  the  quantity  and fate  of toxic  pollu-
tants in POTW's.

PURPOSE

The purposes  of the 40  POTW  study  are to  determine:

    1.    The  quantity of priority  pollutants  in  raw sewage.

    2.    POTW removal efficiencies  for  priority  pollutants.

    3.    The  quantity of priority  pollutants  in  resulting  sludge streams.

This report  presents  results  of the analyses  of  samples collected  at  the
first 20 of the 40 POTWs.

-------
                                   III.

                              POTW SELECTION
SELECTION CRITERIA

A  goal  of  this  project is to obtain priority pollutant  data  representative
of the  type of  secondary treatment  facilities that will  exist  after comple-
tion  of EPA's Construction Grants  Program.   Primary factors  considered  in
selecting the plants  include:

    1.   Treatment processes
    2.   POTW size
    3.   Amount of industrial contribution
    4.   Type of  industrial contribution
    5.   POTW operating efficiency
    6.   Actual flow  as a  percent of design  capacity
    7.   POTW location representing all EPA  regions.

The 40  POTW's  selected for this survey represent the full  spectrum of com-
mon  secondary  treatment   processes  as  reflected  in  the  1978  EPA  Needs
Survey.   However, since  activated  sludge and  trickling filter  plants  are
most  prevalent, the  40 plants are heavily weighted with those types.   Less
common  treatment  processes,  such  as a rotating biological  contactor and  an
aerated  lagoon, are  also  included.   Within the 20 plant data  base, modifi-
cations  of the activated  sludge  process  such  as  contact  stabilization,
Kraus,  and pure  oxygen  are  represented  as well  as some advanced  waste
treatment processes,  notably  tertiary mixed  media filters.

Although according to the  Needs Survey the most numerous POTW's  are in the
smallest size range,  plant selection favors  plants over  5 MGD. Two factors
serve as the  basis  for generally including only POTW's  over  5 MGD.  First,
although there  are relatively  fewer  large POTW's,  the  large  plants  treat
the bulk of wastewater.   In  addition, the General Pretreatment Regulations
primarily affect only  POTW's  larger than  5 MGD.

Actual  flow as  a  percent  of  design capacity is also  an  important selection
criteria.   Plants operating  well below capacity  do not give  a fair repre-
sentation of  priority pollutant  treatment _or  removal.   Although  a few  of
the 20  POTW's operated at  a  low percentage of  their  indicated design  capa-
city, these plants  generally  had  a significant percentage  of  the treatment
processes off-line  during  the week of  sampling.   For example, at  Plant  2,
only  half of  the  primary treatment capacity was  in use when  the plant was
sampled.  Likewise,  at Plant  8, only  seven of  ten  primary  and five of nine
secondary clarifiers  were in operation.   At  Plant  19,  routinely,  only  65
percent of the design  capacity  is on-line.


                                    4

                                    60<

-------
With  regard  to industrial  flow,  POTW's  ranging  from zero to more  than  50
percent  industrial  contribution  are  included.    Similarly,  industries  in
most  of  the  34 industrial  categories  currently  under  review  by  the  EPA
Effluent Guidelines  Division are covered  by  the  study.   Few plants always
meet  the  30/30 BOD,  TSS  secondary treatment  requirements,  but POTW's  are
only  selected  if  their operation is reasonably good.   Finally,  POTW's  from
each  EPA region are included.  The  number of  plants  selected  are in  propor-
tion  to  the  total  number  of POTW's in that region.   As  a result, the  more
densely populated regions  are more  heavily represented.

POTW  Characteristics

In  the  following para-graphs  short  summaries  describing  the treatment  pro-
cess  for each  of  the first  20  plants covered in this  Interim Report  are
presented.   Table 1  includes information  on  the  basic  characteristics  of
each  POTW.   Each  of  the  20  POTW's provided  some  form of secondary treat-
ment, and  every plant chlorinated  its effluent  before discharge.   Some  of
the  POTW's  practice  in-plant chlorination  for odor  control.   These opera-
tions were generally  suspended during  the week of  sampling.

Plant No. 1
This  wastewater treatment  facility  provides secondary treatment  utilizing
the  conventional  activated sludge process.   This POTW can provide  primary
treatment  for  flows  up  to  300  MGD.

The  treatment unit  operations begin with  gravity flow  from the  drainage
area  to the  bar  screens  and  grit  chambers, where  lift  pumps elevate  the
wastewater  for gravity  flow through  the rest of  the plant.   After  the  lift
pumps,  the wastewater  passes  through  pre-aeration,  primary   settling,  and
into  the  aeration chambers.   After  aeration, clarification,   and  chlorina-
tion, the  treated effluent  is  discharged to  the  receiving  stream.

Sludge  handling at this  plant  involves  primary sludge  thickening  by  gravity
thickeners,  secondary  sludge  thickening by  dissolved  air flotation  (DAF),
vacuum  filtration and incineration.

Plant No. 2

At  Plant  No.  2,  wastewater flows  into a  diversion   chamber,  where it  is
pumped  through  a  rising well  and elevated  to a  height that  allows  gravity
flow  to  the  rest  of the plant.   Following the rising well,  the  wastewater
passes  through  parallel  grit chambers,  comminutors, pre-aeration  cnamcers,
and  into  the  primary  settling tank.   After  primary  settling,  wastawater
flows to aeration tanks, secondary  clarifiers, chlorination  basins,  and  is
then  discharged.  During the sampling period, Plant 2 had only half of  Its
primary clarifiers and aeration tanks in use.  This  is why the flow  at  this
plant  is  reported   as  only  53  percent  of  the  plant's  design   cacacity,
although for the  units  in  use  the actual  flow is much closer to  full  capa-
city.

-------
ro
A
                                                                           TABLE I
                                                                    POTW CHARACTERISTICS
                                                                           PUNT
Biological
Treatment
Process
Secondary
Design Flow, MGD
Avg. Dally Flow,
MGD, (Historical)
Avg. Dal ly Flow,
M6D(I) (Actual)
$ Combined/
Separate Sewers
BOD,mg/l,
lnf/EH(l)
TSS, mg/l
In»/Elfcl)
% Industrial
Contribution
Major
Industrial
Contributors




1
AS


120

105

91.3
40/60

215/13
175/20
30

Pharm. ,
Petro-
chemical,
Plating,
Foundries,
Coking,
Foods
2
AS


15

8-10

8(3)
100$
Comb
95/14
97/9
5

Grain
Storage,
Oil/Fuel,
Terminals,
Machine
Tools,
Metal work
3
AS


14

10-11

10.6
•100$
Comb
134/14
265/44
io

Poultry
Process,
Plastics,
Textiles



4
AS


120

80-85

83.7
50/50

152/22
164/43
7

Beverages,
Plating,
Palntllnk
Chemicals,
Foods,
Paper,
Photo
5
AS


25

26

21.7
100$
Sep
138/13
147/12
10

Auto.
Man.
Hospitals,
Plating,
Paper,
Photo
Process
6
AS


7.4

7

7.1
100$
Sep
263/18
632/27
38

Plastics +
Synthetics,
Foundry,
Bakery



7
AS


66

50

48.6
10/90

169/29
135/18
15

Plating,
Auto.
Plants,
Furniture
Man.


8
AS


50

20-25

22.8<2>(3>
100$
Sep
238/42
205/69
10

Auto.
Man.





9
AS


60

45-50

51.8
100$
Comb
113/5
149/14
10

Firearms
Man.





to
AS/TF


30/12

20/0

l6.5/6.9(3)
100$
Sep
242/16
222/16
5

Elec.
Plating,
Metal
Assembly,
Too UOle
Shops,
Plastics
                                                               Process
          (I)  Actual recorded value through total treatment  (secondary or tertiary) during sampling periods.
          (2)  2 MGD treated by trickling filter.
          (3)  See summary description  In text

-------
                                                                      TABLE  I  (Continued)

                                                                      POTVi CHARACTERISTICS

                                                                                   PLANT
a
00
 A

Ulolo
I00<
Com.
194/13 TF
194/9 AS
129/9 TF
129/8 AS
25

Paint,
Plating,
Aircraft
Han.


18
AS


100

82

62.6
too*
Coo.
206/37

266/21
50

Breweries,
Plating,
Canneries,
SI aughter-
houses

19
Pure (>2
AS

120

70

67.8<3>
loot
Sep.
379/37

187/22
20

Food
Process.,
Plating,
Leather
F 1 n 1 sh 1 ng

20
AS + AWT


143

100

119.3
toot
Sep.
247/6

421/5
15-22

Canning
Elec.
Paint
Man.
Deter.
Han.
            (I)  Actual  recorded value through lolol  treatment (secondary  or  tertiary)  during  sampling  periods.

            (2)  Suo  summary  description In text

-------
  Primary sludge at  this  POTU  is  pumped to sludge holding tanks  where it is
  combined  with the  thickened  (via DAP) waste  activated sludge.   From this
  point,  the  combined  sludge passes to  the sludge conditioning  facilities,
  where  it  is heated and pressurized prior  to vacuum  filtration.   The decant
  from the  sludge  conditioning  system and the  filtrate from the vacuum filter
  are  bled  to the  head of  the  aeration  tanks.   The filter  cake  is  inci-
  nerated,  with the  resulting  ash  being  slurned to  a  diked  lagoon  on  the
  plant  property.

  Plant  No.  3

  At   this  POTW,  the influent  is  prechlorinated,  when  required,  and  all
  incoming  sewer  lines  join together  prior to the  bar  screens.    The  flow
  splits  through two  parallel screens,  and then  into two  wet  wells.   The flow
  is then lifted from these  wet wells and continues through the plant by gra-
  vity flow.   The two  flows undergo   grit  removal  and  are  joined  together
  along  with  various  recycle flows at the  feed to the  primary  settling tanks
  (no  pre-aeration is  utilized).    Primary  effluent  flows   to the  aeration
  tanks,  and  after  aeration, to  one   of two  covered  secondary  clarifiers.
  Flows  from  the  clarifiers are  combined  prior to   chlorination,  and  the
  chlorinated  effluent   flows through   one of  two parallel  chlorine  contact
  chambers.  The two  effluent streams overflow to  a common outfall  sewer that
  discharges to the river 100 feet from shore.

  Primary sludge is collected by a bottom  scraper that runs  continuously  and
 the  sludge  is  pumped  to  a  gravity thickener that  concentrates  it  to  eight
 percent solids.   Waste activated sludge is  fed to  a DAF unit where  it  is
 thickened  to two  percent  solids.   The  two treated sludges are pumped  to  the
 sludge  dewatering area where lime  and ferric  chloride are added  and  vacuum
 filters produce a filter  cake  that is  trucked to a landfill.

 Plant No.  4

 This   POTW  also  utilizes  the   conventional   activated  sludge   process.
 Wastewater  enters through  one  of three sewer  trunk  lines,  which  are each
 monitored  by a  magmeter.   The  influent is  prechlorinated for  the purpose  of
 controlling  odors  at the  plant.  Recycle lines from the centrifuge and the
 anaerobic  digester  flow  into  one  of  the  influent   lines before the  three
 lines are  combined.   From here,  the  flow  splits into  four parts, through
 bar screens  and four aerated grit chambers.  After  recombination,  the flow
 next  passes  through   the  primary  clarifiers,  secondary  aeration   tanks
 (diffused air), secondary  clarifiers,  and the chlorine contact chamber, and
 is discharged to the receiving  stream.

The primary  sludge, consisting  of four to five percent solids, is pumped
continuously  to anaerobic  digesters.   Secondary waste  activated sludge  is
pumped to  DAF thickeners  where 1t  is  concentrated to six to  seven percent
solids.     The  DAF   subnatant  is  returned to  the  aeration   tanks.    The
thickened secondary  sludge  is  sent either  to the anaerobic  digesters or  to
centrifuges.  At  the centrifuges,  a polymer is  added before  the sludge  is

-------
thickened.   Thickened  sludge 1s sent to an  incinerator,  which is fueled by
methane  from the  digesters.   Ash  from the  incinerator is  landfilled.

Plant No. 5

Plant 5  uses the  conventional,  or plug  flow,  activated sludge process.  The
POTW  is  capable  of providing  primary  treatment  for an  additional  50  MGD
during  peak wet  weather  flow periods. Routinely,  approximately  two-thirds
of  the  plant's flow  receives secondary treatment  while  the  rest  receives
only primary treatment  and  chlorlnation.

Treatment  unit  operations  begin with  gravity  flow through  mechanically
cleaned  bar screens.    Four  centrifugal   raw  wastewater  pumps  lift  the
wastewater  approximately  35  feet  into the  plant where it  then flows  by gra-
vity  through  the  various  treatment  units.    The  flow  is   split,  passing
through  two parallel  grit  removal  basins,  four comminutors,  four  primary
clarifiers,  six  aeration  tanks, and then through the  four  secondary clari-
fiers.    The  secondary  effluent  is chlorinated  and  discharged  to  the
receiving stream.

This  treatment  facility  stabilizes  waste  sludge  by  using  a three-stage
anaerobic sludge  digestion  system.  Digested sludge  is disposed  of  in four
5-acre sludge  storage  basins.   Digester  supernatant is  returned to the pri-
mary  clarifiers.    Methane  gas  from the  digesters is utilized  to   fuel  a
generator that provides power to  operate blowers  and  pumps.

Plant No. 6

Wastewater   is  pumped  to  Plant  6  where  it  flows  by  gravity   through
mechanically-cleaned  bar  screens  and  grit chambers.   From  the  grit  cham-
bers,  the  influent is  pre-aerated  and  flows  by  gravity to  the  primary
clarifiers.  The  primary  treated wastewater then receives secondary  treat-
ment  in  contact  stabilization  tanks where it  is  mixed with  return  sludge
that has been  aerated.  The mixture  flows  to the  secondary clarifiers where
settled  solids are  returned to  the  sludge  aeration  basin.

Waste activated  sludge is withdrawn from  the  secondary  clarifiers   and  is
pumped to OAF  thickener units.   The thickened  slugde  is  combined with pri-
mary  sludge and   is  pumped  to  a  two-stage  anaerobic  digestion   system.
Subnatant from the  DAF  units  and digester  supernatant are recylced  back  to
the contact  stabilization tanks.   Digested sludge  is  either hauled to land-
fill or dried  in  sludge drying  beds.

Plant No. 7

At this conventional activated  sludge plant, treatment  begins when the flow
from various influent  sewer  lines  passes  through  bar  screens and  through
four parallel  grit  chambers.   The  combined  wastewater from  the  grit cham-
bers then  splits  and  passes  through primary  clarifiers arranged   as  two
parallel  systems.   Primary  effluent  is  aerated in  aeration  basins  and  the
                                    9

                                 65 <

-------
 mixed liquor flows to the secondary clarifiers, after which the effluent  is
 chlorinated and discharged.

 Primary  sludge  and  waste  activated  sludge  are  removed  from  the primary
 tanks and  are  pumped to two digesters used  only  as  holding tanks.  Sludge
 from these tanks is pumped to a heat treatment system, which generally  runs
 continuously.   Heat  treated sludge  is   gravity  thickened  to  18 percent
 solids and  is  then  vacuum filtered to 50 percent  solids.   The heat treat-
 ment  decant,  the  thickener  overflow,  and the  vacuum filter  filtrate are
 returned to holding  tanks  and are  gradually  recycled to one of the primary
 systems.    The  gravity  thickeners  and   vacuum  filters  do  not   run   con-
 tinuously.  Conditioned sludge is incinerated.


 Plant No. 8

 This facility uses  a combination of trickling filter  and  activated sludge
 processes to provide  secondary wastewater treatment.   Microscreens and re-
 aeration  basins provide  additional  advanced  wastewater  treatment.    The
 trickling filter process treats  approximately 2 MGD with the remaining  flow
 being treated by the  activated sludge  process.  Half of the aeration tanks
 were  not  in use during  the  week of  sampling,  because plant  flow had not
 approached  design  capacity.   This  is  why the  actual POTW  flow  is only  34
 percent of the  plant's design capacity.

 Raw wastewater entering the plant  initially  passes through  bar screens and
 aerated  grit  chambers  before  receiving  treatment  in primary clarifiers.
 From the primary clarifiers, wastewater passes through the  aeration basins
 or  trickling  filters,  secondary  clarifiers, microscreens,  re-aeration
 basins,  and chlorine contact tanks prior  to  discharge.

 Waste activated sludge  and  trickling  filter  humus are thickened  using air
 flotation (DAF) and  are then combined with  primary  sludge.   The combined
 sludge is then  heat  treated  and  dewatered using  vacuum  filters.   Filtered
 sludge is incinerated.

 Heat  treatment  decant and vacuum filter filtrate  are  recycled to the plant
 influent  upstream of the bar screens.   DAF  subnatant is   recycled  to the
 primary  settling tank effluent.

 Plant  No.  9

 This  POTW treats  wastewater using  the conventional  activated  sludge  pro-
 cess.   The treatment  process  consists  of  screening,   shredding,  grit  remo-
 val,   primary   treatment,  activated   sludge   secondary  treatment,  final
 settling,  and chlorination.   The  unit operations  used  in the  sludge handl-
 ing  system  include  thickening, filtration (belt and  vacuum),  and  incinera-
tion.

Ash produced during incineration   is  sluiced  to one  of two  lagoons, and  is
periodically hauled  from  these lagoons  to  a local  sanitary  landfill.


                                     10

-------
Plant No.  10

Plant 10  provides  wastewater  treatment  using a combination of the activated
sludge  process  and trickling  filter  process.   The plant  also  operates a 9
MGD  sand  filter for tertiary treatment.  All  of  the  filtered water is sold
as  irrigation  water, and  none  is  discharged.   Tertiary  filter backwash is
sent to the  head  of the  trickling  filter plant.

Influent  to  the POTW enters from  several sewer lines,  is  combined in a wet
well, and then  divides  between  the two  plants. Bar screens,  grit chambers,
and  comminutors are utilized  before primary treatment.   The wastewatar then
passes  through  primary  clarifiers.    In the   activated  sludge  plant,  the
wastewater flows to one of  three  aeration  tanks.  Each  tank utilizes both
mechanical  and diffused aeration, and   feeds  one  of  four  secondary  clari-
fiers.    The  secondary  clarifiers  incorporate a  chlorine  contact  chamber,
which  is  concentric to  the  tanks.    Wastewater  flows  outward from  the
overflow  weir  along the  circumference of the tank.  After  chlorination, the
flow from the  secondary  tanks  recombines prior to  discharge.

Primary   sludge from  the   activated sludge  plant  is  degritted,  gravity
thickened,  vacuum filtered and  pumped  to an  anaerobic digester.   Overflow
from the  gravity thickener is returned  to  the secondary  system,  and  vacuum
filter  filtrate  is recycled  to  the primary   influent.   Return  activated
sludge  is recycled to the  aeration tanks, and  waste activated sludge  (along
with scum) is   centrifuged and  pumped to an aerobic digester.   The  centri-
fuge  thickens   sludge  from 1/Z  to 2 percent  solids,   and  the centrate  is
returned  to  the primary  effluent.

After primary treatment, the wastewater in  the trickling  filter plant  flows
through  one of  three  trickling filters  (two  are currently  in use).   Two
filters have  redwood media and  one  has rock media.  The  effluent  from the
filters is recombined and  flows  to the  secondary clarifiers.   Effluent from
the  clarifiers  flows through  one  of two chlorine  contact chambers  before
discharge.  Secondary sludge from  the trickling filter  plant  is returned  to
the head  of the  primary  tanks  in the  trickling filter plant.

Combined  sludge from the primary tanks   is  pumped to an  anaerobic digester.
All  digested  sludge from both  the aerobic   and  anaerobic  digestars  is
trucked to a landfil1.

Plant No.   11
Raw wastewater  entering  this  trickling filter facility first flows  through
bar screens,  grit  chambers,  and then additional  bar screens.  The  influent
is both  pre-aerated  and  prechlorinated, before it undergoes primary  treat-
ment  in  one  of  four primary  clarifiers.    After primary  treatment,  the
wastewater  is  recombined  and  flows  to  one  of  eight  trickling  filters.
Trickling  filter  effluent  flows  to the  secondary clarifiers  and  is  then
chlorinated  and piped  to a  drainage   canal  which flows  to the receiving
stream.  Trickling  filter  effluent  receives a low dosage  of chlorine prior
to secondary  clarification for  algae control.


                                     11

                                    67<

-------
    This POTW also operates a post treatment system for some secondary effluent
    by means  of  an  activated sludge plant.  Most  of this  water  is used inter-
    nally by  the  plant  for equipment  cleaning and lawn  sprinkling.   At times,
    some of this  activated  sludge  effluent is discharged with the total  plant
    effluent.   One secondary clarifier is used exclusively for the post treat-
    ment  system.

    Secondary  sludge  is  recycled  back  to the  primary  clarifiers.   Combined
    sludge  from the  primary clarifiers  and the waste  activated sludge from  the
    post  treatment  system  are  anaerobically digested  without   intermediate
   thickening  or dewatering.    Digested  sludge   is  pumped  to  drying beds.
   Skimmings are currently hauled away and dried  sludge is sold as fertilizer.

   Plant No. 12

   The  treatment  unit  operations  at  this  facility  begin  with  raw  sewage
   passing  through bar screens, and then  flowing to one  of ten  primary  clari-
   fiers.   After  primary  clarification,  the wastewater flows to mechanically
   aerated  basins  and  then to  the  secondary  clarifiers.    Final  -treated
   effluent  from  the  secondary clarifiers passes  through  a chlorine contact
   chamber and is  discharged.

   Primary  sludge  is' cyclone centrifuged  for grit removal  before  it is com-
   bined  with  the  waste activated  sludge.   Combined  sludge is then thickened
   in  gravity  thickeners, dewatered on  vacuum filters,  and  then hauled to  a
   landfill.

  Plant No. 13

  In  addition to  secondary treatment,  this  conventional  activated  sludge
  plant provides  advanced  wastewater treatment by  passing secondary effluent
  through mixed-media filters.   As the influent  enters  the  plant, it passes
  through bar  screens,  grit chambers and  then splits  at a ratio of two to one
  into two  parallel  primary and secondary  treatment systems.

  Effluent  from the  secondary  clarifiers  flows  to  screw  pumps where  it  is
  lifted  to  mixed-media  filters.    The  wastewater  then  flows  by  gravity
  through the  filters  and is  discharged.   The  primary and waste  activated
  sludges are  combined and then anaerobically  digested.   Digested  sludge  is
 applied as fertilizer to farmlands.

 Plant No.  14

 This   treatment   plant  provides   secondary  treatment  using  the  activated
 sludge process.   As the wastewater enters the plant,  it passes through bar
 screens,  comminutors  and  is  then  pumped  to  an  aerated  grit  chamber.
 Wastewater  then   passes  through  primary  clarifiers and an  aeration  tank.
 From  the aeration tank, the  wastewater  passes through  secondary clarifiers,
and a chlorine contact chamber prior to discharge.
                                    12

                                    68<

-------
Waste  activated  sludge  Is  recycled to the primary clarifiers.  The combined
sludge  is pumped  to  a nearby  plant  for  final  disposal  after  it  has been
digested  by  a  two-stage anaerobic digestion system.

Actual  flow  is  reported  as only  54 percent  of  design  capacity  at this
plant.    The  correct  percent  of  design  capacity  in  use  is  much  higher
because  certain  sections  of the plant were  off  line  during the  week  of
sampling.

Plant  No.  15

This  45 year  old  treatment facility  provides  secondary treatment  using  a
fixed  nozzle 1 1/2 acre trickling  filter.   Uastewater  enters the plant via
two  trunk   lines:   one  transmitting  only domestic  flow;  and the  other
carrying  all of  the industrial  flow.   The two  lines receive separate treat-
ment  in aerated grit  chambers,  then  are  combined  and  flow  to six  parallel
primary  tanks.   Primary  effluent  is  gravity  fed  to the  trickling  filters
and  is followed  by three parallel  secondary clarifiers.   Effluent  from the
secondary clarifiers  is pumped  to a 2 1/2 acre  polishing  lagoon.  A  section
of the lagoon  is  baffled  for use as a chlorine  contact  chamber.

Return sludge  and digester decant  are returned  to  the  head  of three of the
six    primary tanks.    The  sludge from  the  primary  tanks  is  pumped  to
digesters,  and is  eventually dewatered on  drying beds.

Plant  No.  16

This  POTW provides wastewater  treatment  using  a unique combination  of  two
parallel  trickling filter  plants,  followed by  additional  activated  sludge
treatment,   and mixed-media  filtration.   Of the  nearly  150 MGD treated,
approximately  80  MGD  receive tertiary treatment  while the  remainder  receive
only  secondary treatment.

The  parallel  plants are  serviced  by  separate  interceptors.  Both  systems
provide  grit  removal,  and  primary clarification.   One  system uses  a  two-
stage  trickling  filter  configuration, and the other system  uses  a standard
single-stage trickling  filter.    Both systems provide secondary  clarifica-
tion and  pump  part  of their  effluent  to  the  teritary system.  The remaining
effluent  is  combined with  tertiary effluent, and  is  then  chlorinated  and
discharged.

Waste  sludge  from the  trickling  filter  plants  is treated  by  anaerobic
digestion  and  sludge  from  the   teritary  plant  is  treated  by   aerobic
digestion.   Digested sludge  is  then pumped 22 miles for  subsoil  injection.


Plant No. 17

This plant  was originally constructed as  a trickling filter  POTW,  but  has
been enlarged  with the installation  of  a  parallel   activated  sludge  plant.

-------
 The two  parallel  plants  have a  common head  works  but  separate  effluent
 1ines.

 The treatment unit operations  of  the  trickling filter plant begin with grit
 removal,  followed by  primary  clarification, secondary treatment,  and then
 secondary clarification.  The activated sludge  plant  treatment unit opera-
 tions  begin with grit  removal, followed by  primary clarification, aeration,
 and secondary clarification.  Influent  flow is  regulated  to  each system by
 automatic gate valves.  The  activated sludge plant treats  approximately two
 thirds of the total  plant influent.

 Primary and  secondary  sludge  from the  trickling  filter plant  is  combined
 with primary sludge from  the  activated sludge plant  and  is  then thickened
 and anaerobically  digested.   Waste  activated sludge  from the  activated
 sludge plant  is aerobically  digested.   All digested  sludge is sent  to  a
 lagoon.

 Plant  No. 18

 Plant  No. 18 provides  secondary  treatment  using the  activated  sludge pro-
 cess.   When influent enters the POTW,  it first  passes through  a grit remo-
 val  chamber and  bar  screens.    After this  preliminary  treatment,  the
 wastewater  flows to  one of eight  primary clarifiers.   Primary effluent then
 flows  through aeration tanks  to  one  of eight secondary clarifiers.   Final
 secondary effluent is  chlorinated* with contact occurring in  a three-mile
 long underground discharge sewer.

 Primary sludge is  processed by cyclone  degritters,  gravity thickeners, and
 anaerobic digesters.   The  waste  activated sludge  is centrifuged  before
 aerobic digestion.   All  digested  sludge is  stored  in a lagoon  for land
 application.  Sludge  from two -other  POTW's,  accounting  for approximately
 ten  percent  of the total  sludge,  is pumped  to  this plant and treated in the
 digesters.

 Plant  No. 19

 This POTW,  recently  upgraded from a primary to  a  secondary treatment faci-
 lity,  utilizes the high purity oxygen  activated  sludge process.  Wastewater
 is prechlorinated  in an  influent wet  well,  passes  through  bar screens, grit
 chambers, aerated  grit chambers  (high flow  periods  only),  primary  sedimen-
 tation, and  into the pure  oxygen  reactors.   Secondary effluent  after clari-
 fication  is  chlorinated and  then  dechlorinated using  sulfur  dioxide before
 discharge to a 1-1/2 mile  underground  outfall  sewer.

 Waste  activated  sludge is centrifuged and combined with the  primary sludge
 for anaerobic digestion.   Digested sludge is vacuum filtered.  The  digester
 supernatant  and  vacuum filter filtrate are  combined  with  other  recycle
 lines  (scum  thickener  supernatant,  grit dewatering overflow,  and  cooling
water from the oxygen  generator) and  returned  to the  headworks  prior to the
bar screens.
                                    14

                                      70<

-------
Although  the  actual  flow  is reported  as  only  55  percent  of  design  flow,
since entire  treatment units were  not in  operation,  this  percent  is  low.
True plant utilization was much higher.

Plant No. 20

This advanced wastewater treatment  facility  currently  uses  the  Kraus nitri-
fication  modification of the activated  sludge process.  Wastewater enters
this  facility in  three  trunklines,  combining  just prior  to  bar  screens.
After  screening,  the  wastewater  passes through  eight parallel grit  tanks
and  into  a set of 26 primary sedimentation  tanks.  Effluent  from  primary
settling  is combined  and  flows  to the 16 aeration  tanks  and  to a  system of
26   secondary  clarifiers.    Effluent  from   all   clarifiers  is   comoined
underground   and   flows  to  one  of  two   parallel   nitrification   systems.
Nitrified  effluent  is  pumped  to   four  mixed  media  filters.    Filtered
effluent  is chlorinated and  dechlorinated prior  to  discharge.

All  recycle  lines  (filter wash water,  drying bed decant)  enter the system
at the discharge  from  the grit tanks.  Waste  activated  sludges  and  nitrifi-
cation  sludges  are  OAF  thickened,   combined  with  the  primary  sludge,  and
digested  anaerobically.  The digested  sludge  is  dewatered on  drying  beds.

-------
                                    IV.

                                 SAMPLING
 SAMPLING FREQUENCY

 A six  day  sampling period,  excluding Sundays, was  selected for this  study
 based  on  both  the findings of  the Pilot Study and  logistic and budgetary
 factors.   Consequently,  for  16  of  the  20  POTW's  covered,  six  days of
 sampling were  completed.   At Plants  3  and  8, only,  four  days  of sampling
 were completed.   For Plant 3,  the  shorter  sampling  period was  planned to
 permit  analytical  capacity  for three  8-hour influent  composites  per  day.
 At  Plant 8,  POTW operating problems  necessitated  shortening  the sampling
 program.   The  only exception to  no Sunday  sampling  was a  set  of samples
 collected at Plant 9 on a Sunday.   This sample was collected to coordinate
 sampling periods  with  another EPA project occurring  simultaneously in the
 same city.

 The  two POTW's  covered  in  the  Pilot Study (Plants  1 and 2) were sampled for
 a  longer period  of time and  more  intensely than those sampled  afterward.
 At  Plant 1,  influent,  effluent, and  sludge streams  were  sampled  over 24
 hours for seven consecutive  days.   Influent  was collected three times  daily
 as 8-hour composites during the first seven consecutive  days,  and then as
 one   24-hour  composite  daily  for  an additional  seven  days.   At  Plant 2,
 seven consecutive days  of  24-hour  sampling were completed.

 SAMPLING TECHNIQUES

 Generally,  uniform sampling techniques  were  used  at  the  POTW's  sampled in
 this study.   These  techniques are  described  in  detail in  the  Pilot   Study
 report.   To obtain the  most  representative  sample  from each sample point,
 automatic  samplers were used  wherever  possible  to gather  frequent equal-
 sized sample  aliquots.   This  procedure  was  only possible  where  flows were
 continuous and  accessible  by automatic  sampling equipment.

At the  early plants, automatic sampler tubing was  changed daily and sampler
blanks  were  run before  beginning  each  day's  new  composite.  Later  in the
program, for budgetary reasons,  this  procedure was  discontinued,  with  fresh
Teflon  tubing  used  only when  a  sampler  was  set  up  at  a  new  collection
point.   The  automatic samplers  were  calibrated to  pull  sample  aliquots of
at least 100 ml,  at time  intervals not to  exceed  30 minutes.   The actual
quantity and  frequency  of  sample aliquots was  governed  by the depth of the
waste stream  relative to the automatic  samples.  Composites in  the automa-
tic  samplers  were collected in  2.5-gallon glass  jars that  were  kept   in an
ice bath at 4°C for the entire 24-hour period  of sampling.
                                    16

-------
In  those  cases where  wastewater  or sludge  flows  were intermittent  or  not
pumpable,  such  as   primary  sludge,  grab  sampling was  practiced.    Grab
samples were  also  taken where prescribed  by EPA's sampling protocol.   All
grabs were collected at least six times a  day,  and  often more  frequently.

On  occasion,  as  dictated  by  sample  point  configuration,  samples  were
grabbed via an intermediate  vessel.  This  method of sampling is  a  modifica-
tion  to the  protocol   for  fractions,  such  as oil  and grease,  where  the
sample  container is  supposed to  be filled  directly  from  the wastewater
stream.   This modification was made at  a few sample points for safety  and
practical  reasons  since positioning of  the sample  container  into most  of
these  waste  streams  was  either  impossible  or   very  dangerous,   and  the
induced  error through  use  of  an  intermediate  beaker was  of lesser  con-
sequence.   In all  cases where an  intermediate beaker was used,  it  was  used
exclusively at one  point  for the  duration of sampling  at the  plant,  and  it
was repeatedly purged  with fresh  sample before each  sample was collected.

SAMPLE POINTS

Sample  points were  selected  to  characterize both  the Influent and  effluent
stream  toxic  pollutant  levels, toxic pollutants in  sludge and, by  combining
these  data,  toxic  pollutant  mass balances  through the POTW-.  Other  sample
points  were  selected  to  best  characterize wastewater  and  sludges at  par-
ticular  stages  of  treatment.  At each  plant,  an  effort was made to  select
sample  points in such a way  that any  extraneous  factors that mignt  affect
the  validity  of the  sample  would be eliminated.   This involved  selecting
sample  points that allowed  sample  collection  before settling,  volatiliza-
tion, or contamination  from  other waste streams or  recycle flows.

Table  2  lists  all   samples  taken  during  the  20-plant program.    In the
following paragraphs each sampling point type is briefly described.

Influent (Total) -  Generally, total influent  samples  were  collected  prior
to pre-aeranon, grit  removal, or recycle streams  such as  digester decant.
To  avoid  automatic  sampler  tube  fouling  where possible,  influent samples
were collected downstream  of  bar  screens.   When access to the influent was
such that representative samples could not be taken  via automatic  samoling,
grab  composite  aliquots  were collected   every two hours.   When  a   total
influent sample  was  not available prior  to any interferences or because of
access problems  or  multiple  influent  streams,  upstream samples of  seoarate
flows were taken and manually composited to create  a total  influent sample.
                                    17

                                    73<

-------
oo
                                                      TABLE 2
                                           SUMMARY OF NUMBER OF SAMPLES
                                                TAKEN AT EACH PLANT

                                                PLANT 1 THROUGH 10
SAHPLE LOCATION

INFLUENT (TOTAL)
SECONDARY EFFL. (UNCHLORINATEO)
SECONDARY EFFLUENT (CHLORINATED)
SECONDARY EFFLUENT (OTHER)
PRIHARY SLUDGE (RAW)
PRIMARY SLUDGE (THICKENED)
PRIHARY SLUDGE (DIGESTED)
COMBINED SLUDGE-RAU FROH PRIMARY
COHDINED SLUDGE (UNTREATED)
COMB, SLUDGE-SECONDARY THICKENED
COMBINED SLUDGE (BOTH THICKENED)
COMBINED SLUDGE (DIGESTED)
COMBINED SLUDGE (HEAT TREATED)
WASTE ACT, SLUDGE (UNTREATED)
WASTE ACT, SLUDGE-DAF THICKENED
W.A.S. (OTHER THICKENED)
SECONDARY SLUDGE (UNTREATED)
TAP WATER
HEAT TREATMENT DECANT
GRAVITY THICKENER OVERFLOW
VACUUM FILTER FILTRATE
FLOTABLES
COMBINATION OF SOURCES
1
28
3
7
7
2
7
7
7
-
3
12
4
4
-
4
6
_
6
-
3
6
_
6
_
A
6
_
6
A
                                                                                   a

                                                                                   4

                                                                                   4

                                                                                   3



                                                                                   4

                                                                                    4
10

6
A
6
4
TOTAL
SAMPLES

   87
   24
   52
    4
   22
    4
    4
   14
   13
   11
    4
   IB
   10
   14
     1
     2
     4
     3
    10
     1
     1
     7
     2
         TOTAL
                                                                                                        320

-------
C/l
SAMPLE LOCATION

INFLUENT (TOTAL)
INFLUENT (OTHER)
PftlHARY EFFLUENT
SECONDARY EFFL. (UNCHLORINATED)
SECONDARY EFFLUENT (CHLOKINATEb)
SECONDARY EFFLUENT (OTHER)
TERTIARY EFFLUENT (CHLORINATE!')
PRIMARY SLUDOE  (RAU>
PRIMARY SLUDOE  
&

3
3

_
1
„
3
-
_
-
-
1
_
16
6
6
_
_
i
_
6
_
_
^
-
6
-
-
1
_
17
6
_
_
-
6
6
-
6
_
-
6
-
6
-
1
_
IB
&
-
.
t>
-
-
-
-
^
-
-
-
4

t
_
TOTAL
19 20 SAMPLES
66 60
18
6 »2
66 33
6 39
- - 6
6 IB
66 31
4
21
- 6
- - 6
66 42
6
1 - 6
2 2
                TOTAL
                                                                                                                312

-------
 Influent (Other) - At  three  of the plants  covered  in  this Interim Report,
 additional  influent points were sampled.   At  Plant  14  an additional set  of
 samples was  taken  on the  industrial  side influent.  At  Plant  15 an addi-
 tional  set  of  samples  was  taken  at  the City's  second treatment  plant
 (domestic  sewage only).  Plant 16  plant  had  two treatment trains that were
 both  sampled  independently.   The  same  criteria were used  in  choosing the
 Influent (Other) points as were applied to the Influent (lotal) points.

 Primary Effluent  -  At  two   of  the  20  POTW's,  primary  settling  tank
 overflows,  prior to secondary treatment,  were  sampled.   In both instances,
 automatic  samplers were set up in  the channel  between primary and secondary
 treatment.   The channels represented  the  well-mixed combined effluent flow
 from all primary tanks.

 Secondary Effluent (Unchlorinated) -  At  11 of the  20 plants,  samples  were
 collected prior to chlorine disinfection.  This sample  was collected either
 at  the secondary  clarifier   overflow or  in  the  channel  leading to  the
 chlorine contact chamber or discharge pipe.   In  the majority of plants the
 next step  in  the  treatment process was chlorine disinfection,  but in  some
 plants additional  treatment prior to  disinfection was practiced.   At other
 plants  the  unchlorinated  effluent was  the last accessible  sampling  point
 before final  discharge.

 Secondary Effluent (Chlorinated)   -   This  sample  point  represents   the
 effluent from the chlorine  contact  chamber,  prior  to  discharge to  the
 receiving water.

 Secondary Effluent (Other)  -  Two  of the 20  POTW's had two  chlorinated
 effluent discharge conduits;  one  each  for  separate  activated  sludge  and
 trickling   filter  processes.   One  of the  points  was considered  secondary
 effluent (chlorinated)  and for clarity the  other  was labeled  "Secondary
 Effluent (Other)."  Automatic  samplers were used at  both points.

 Tertiary Effluent  (Chlorinated)  -  Three  of  the plants  covered  in  this
 Interim Report  utilized mixed  media  filtration  as a  tertiary  treatment
 step.   At  each  of these plants an additional  sample  was taken  after  the
 mixed  media filters.   In each  case  the wastewater  was chlorinated after the
 filters and prior  to the accessible sample point.

 Primary Sludge (Raw) -  At each plant  an  attempt was  made to sample the  pri-
 mary  sludge as it  was  removed  from the primary settling  tanks,  before any
 further treatment.   Samples  of the  sludge were  always collected  as  grab
 composites  for two  reasons:    sludge consistency  and  lack  of  continuous
 availability.  The majority of these  samples were taken  from  taps either on
 the sludge  pumps themselves or on the  lines conveying the  sludge  to storage
 or further  treatment.   Occasionally,  the sludge point would  be  in a rising
well   controlled  by telescoping  valves.    The  consistency  of  this  sample
 varied  depending upon  the means  utilized by  the  respective  plants  for
drawing  the sludge from the  primary  tanks.   Samples were  taken so as  to
attempt  to   represent  the average  sludge  consistency.    This  involved
                                    20


                                     76<

-------
collecting  sludge grabs  spaced  over the-  sampling  day, or  grab  composites
spanning definite  pumping periods.

Primary Sludge  (Thickened)  - At two  of the  plants  the raw  primary  sludge
was  not  accessible, necessitating  collection of prtmary  sludge  after gra-
vity  thickening.   Sampling  procedures  and  techniques  for this  point were
the  same as  the sampling  procedures  for the raw primary sludge.

Primary Sludge  (Digested) -  At one plant the raw primary  sludge  was  pumped
directly to  digesters, with no  accessible intermediate taps or  valves  for
sampling.  Consequently,  a sample  of  the digested primary  sludge  was  taken.
This  sample  was collected from a pump tap  as a  manual  grab composite.

Combined Sludge (Raw from Primary)  - A  number  of  plants  recycle   their
secondary  siuoge  directly back  into  the  primary settling  tanks.   At  these
plants a combined  sludge  sample  was taken  in the  same  manner  described pre-
viously  for primary sludge.   These  samples  were  composited directly  from
the  primary  tanks, prior  to  any  sludge  conditioning.

Combined Sludge (Untreated)  -  At one of the 20 POTWs  sludge from  the  pri-
mary  tanks  was  not accessible  and  a  sample  of  the sludge  after it  had  com-
bined with the waste activated  sludge was  taken.  At another  plant  a manual
flow  composite  sample  of  both  primary and  waste activated  sludges was  taken
and  analyzed as a combined  sample  of the  total waste sludge being removed
from  the system.

Combined Sludge (Secondary Thickened)   -   This   sample  is   the   same   as
"Combined  Sluage  - Untreated"  except that  the  wasted  secondary sludge  had
already been thickened prior to  combination  with the primary  sludge.

Combined Sludge (Both Thickened) -  At the  two plants where sludge  from  the
secondary settling tanks  was not immediately  accessible, samples were  taken
after the sludge had been gravity thickened  and combined with the thickened
primary sludge.

Combined Sludge (Digested) - At  three of  the plants  covered in this report
tne  secondary  sluage by  itself  was  not accessible  prior  to digestion,  so
that a combined sludge sample  after digestion was taken.

Combined Sludge (Heat Treated) - In an effort to explore the effects of  the
heat  treatment  process  on  toxic  pollutants  in  sludge treatment, sludge
samples  from two   heat  treatment systems  at POTW's  covered  in  this   study
were sampled.

Combined Sludge (Other)  - At  one  plant which  had   two  parallel  treatment
trains, two  separate  primary settling tank  sludges  were  sampled.   At this
particular  plant,  the  primary tank  sludges included  the  waste  secondary
sludges because the  waste secondary  sludges were recycled  to  the  head  of
the primary settling basin.
                                    21

                                77<

-------
 Waste Activated Sludge (Untreated) -  Waste  activated  sludge  (WAS)  sample
 points varied from plant  to  plant,  depending on  WAS  stream accessibility.
 At some  plants,  WAS was  accessible  in  rising  wells  prior  to  sludge con-
 ditioning.   If the rising  wells were  sufficiently mixed, automatic  samplers
 were used to  gather  WAS  samples.   At  plants without  rising wells, or when
 the well  was  not  mixed,  samples were  taken  from  taps  on  the sludge  pumps.
 Often, however, there were no  accessible sampling points  on the WAS line.
 In these cases,  since WAS and return  activated  sludge are usually iden-
 tical, samples  were  taken from the  return  sludge  pumps  or return  sludge
 lines.

 Waste Activated Sludge (DAF Thickened)   -  At one plant   covered   in this
 report,  an  additional sample  of the waste  activated  sludge was taken after
 it had been  conditioned  in  a  dissolved  air  notation system.   This was a
 single grab  sample.

 Waste Activated Sludge (Other Thickened) -  At  another  POTW, two  manually
 collected composite  samples  were taken of the waste activated  sludge after
 centrifugation.   The  samples ..were taken from  a tap on the  pump conveying
 the thickened sludge  to the digesters.

 Secondary Sludge (Untreated)  -  These  samples  represent the trickling  filter
 humus collected at two of the  plants covered in  this  report.   Manual com-
 posite samples  were  taken at  both  plants because  sludge  consistency  and
 availability  prevented using  automatic  sampling.

 Nitrification Sludge  - One of  the 20  POTW's  followed  its  activated  sludge
 process  with   nitrification.  At this  plant  two  grab samples of the waste
 nitrification sludge were taken.   These samples  were taken directly from
 the waste sludge pumps as  single grab  samples.

 Heat  Treatment Decant - At  the two plants  sampled  that  conditioned  the
 sludge by heat  treatment, decant or  supernatant  samples  from the heat
 treated sludge holding tanks  were manually composited  to  correspond to  the
 "Combined Sludge  (Heat Treated)"  samples  taken  from  the  same  plant.   At
 Plant  7,  these  samples  were  taken  from a  sample tap  on  the side  of  the
 decant  tank  (gravity flow),   while  at  Plant  8  the   decant samples were
 grabbed from  the  sludge decant  tank overflow  weir.

 Gravity Thickener Overflow -  A  single grab sample of the overflow from  the
 gravity thickener was .taken at  Plant 3.   The  sample was taken directly from
 the overflow  weir.

 Vacuum Filter Filtrate -  A single grab  sample  of  the  filtrate  from  the
 vacuum  filter at  Plant  1 was grabbed  from the  pressure  line  from  the
filters.  All  fractions were  filled  as one grab  sample via an  intermediate
vessel.

Fleatables -  Also at Plant 1,  a complete  set  of samples  of the skimmings
from the  primary  settling  tanks was taken.   Manual  composite  samples were
                                    22

-------
gathered  by  dipping into  the  floating layer  at  the collection end  of the
primary settling tanks.

Combination of Sources  -  At Plant 10, two  manual  composite samples  of the
aerobic  digester feed  were taken.   The sample  was a  combination  of  the
thickened waste  activated sludge and  the floatables.   Manual   samples  were
taken at this point from  a  tap on the  sludge  feed  pump.

Tap Water  -  Background samples  of the  domestic  water  as  supplied  to  the
plants'  service  areas  were taken at  9  of  the  20  plants  covered in  this
report.  Samples were taken at a  frequently used  sink within the plant  pre-
mises.   The  tapwater  was  allowed  to run  for a  period of time  prior  to
sample collection.
                                    23

-------
                                     V.

                                    DATA
 OVERALL POTW DATA

 At the first 20  plants  of the 40 plant  study,  632  individual  samples were
 collected  and  analyzed  for  toxic  pollutants.    Combining  data  from  all
 liquid and sludge samples, in total, 103 toxic  pollutants  were measured at
 least once at  levels  above their detection  limits.  The  toxic  pollutants
 never  found   include  acrolein,   benzidine,   hexachloroethane,   hexach-
 lorocyclopentadiene,  nitrobenzene,  several  ethers,  all  nitrosoamines, endo-
 sulfans and metabolites, endrin and metabolites, all but two PCB mixtures,
 and toxaphene.

 Tables 3 and 4 present occurrence  data  and  concentration ranges  for POTW
 influent  and secondary  effluent  samples.  In  influent  samples  across  the
 20-plant  data base, 93  toxic  pollutants  were measured at  least  once above
 their detection limits.   Likewise,  in secondary effluents, 84  toxic pollu-
 tants were found at levels above their  detection limits.  Finally, of  the
 24 toxic  pollutants found in  more than 50  percent of the  influent samples,
 all  were  detected less  frequently in  effluent samples.

 In all, 76  toxic  pollutants were found in raw sludges.  For the purposes of
 this  discussion,  raw sludges  include  thickened  sludges.  Table  5  summarizes
 the  occurrence  of these  pollutants in sludges across the 20 POTW  data base.
 Twelve of  the  15 most  frequently  occurring  and most  highly  concentrated
 toxic  pollutants  in raw  sludge are metals.

 Figures A-l to  A-8  in  Appendix A present cumulative distribution curves of
 pollutant  removal and effluent concentration for selected priority pollu-
 tants.  These curves are discussed in Section VI.

 Tables  B-l  to B-60 in Appendix B present detailed  data summaries  for each
 of the 20 POTW's.  For each plant, a Summary  of  Analytical  Data is  included
 which  presents  averages of each  pollutant parameter found at each  sample
 point  covered.   A Mass  Balance is  also   included for each  POTW.    In  these
 tables, the average pounds  per  day  of each pollutant entering  the  POTW  are
tabulated, as well as the daily pounds exiting the POTW.  Finally,  for each
POTW, a Summary of  Percent  Occurrence 1s  presented  that tabulates  the per-
 cent  of times  each  pollutant  was  found  at  each  sampling  point  at each
plant.
                                    24


                                  80<

-------
                                                    TABLE 3

                                       OCCURRENCE OF PRIORITY POLLUTANTS
                                           IN POTU INFLUENT SAMPLES
CD
h*
 A
PARAMETER

ZINC
COPPER
CYANIDE
CHROMIUM
TOLUENE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROFORH
HETHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
BIS<2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
1»1r1-TRICHLOROETHANE
NICKEL
ETHYLBENZENE
SILVER
PHENOL
LEAD
CADMIUM
MERCURY
BENZENE
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
1P2-TRANS-HICHLOROETHYLENE
NAPHTHALENE
1 r1-DICH1QRQETHANE
1 r 1-MCHLOROETHYLENE
                1
   -DICIH OR06EN2ENE
                PENTACHLOROPHENOL
                ANTHRACENE
NUHBER OF PERCENT
SAMPLES OF TIMES
ANALYZED DETECTED UNITS MINIHUHU)
146
146
150
146
152
152
152
152
152
152
152
146
152
146
152
146
146
146
152
152
152
152
152
152
152
152
152
152
152
100
100
99
99
98
97
96
95
95
94
91
87
B6
84
63
79
71
70
68
63
62
59
58
55
40
35
30
27
27
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UG/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
NG/L
UO/L
UG/L
UO/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
23
34
3
8
2
2
1
1
1
2
1
11
1
2
1
16
1
200
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
HAXIHUH
7680
1190
2500
2380
500
1100
430
11000
860
390
1600
1930
448
77
380
935
1800
3900
1560
105
33
140
97
150
24
243
440
94
93

-------
                                                 TABLE 3 (CONT.)

                                        OCCURRENCE OF PRIORITY POLLUTANTS
                                             IN POTW INFLUENT SAMPLES
00
PARAMETER


PHENANTHRENE
GAMMA-BHC
1r 4-DICHLOROBENZENE
ARSENIC
ANTIMONY
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
METHYL CHLORIDE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
CHLOROBENZENE
1r 2-DICHLOROPROPANE
DICHLOROBROMOMETHANE
PYRENE
2r4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
FLUORANTHENE
DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
lr2-DICHLOROETHANE
SELENIUM
VINYL CHLORIDE
1F1p 2-TRICHLOROETHANE
PCB-1242
HEPTACHLOR
1r1r2r2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
FLUORENE
2»4»6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
ALPHA-BHC
1>2r4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
NUMBER OF PERCENT
SAMPLES OF TIMES
ANALYZED DETECTED UNITS MINIMUM! 1)
152
152
152
146
146
152
152
152
152
152
152
152
152
152
152
152
152
152
146
152
152
152
152
152
152
152
152
152
27
23
23
16
14
13
12
11
11
11
10
9
9
9
9
9
8
B
8
7
6
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
UO/L
NO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UG/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UG/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UG/L
UO/L
UO/L
NO/L
NG/L
UG/L
UO/L
UO/L
NO/L
UO/L
1
20
2
2
1
5
3
2
1
1
1
5
1
3
1
5
5
1
1
28
2
2300
80
3
5
1
50
3
MAXIMUM
93
500
200
00
192
18
270
1900
5
5
4
84
55
92
22
5
210
59
20
3900
135
49600
500
52
5
6
3000
32

-------
                                                TABLE  3  (CONT.)

                                       OCCURRENCE  OF  PRIORITY  POLLUTANTS
                                           IN  POTW INFLUENT  SAMPLES
CD
CO
/\
             PARAMETER
PARACHLOROMETA CRESOL
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
2-CHLOROPHENOL
CHRYSENE
1F 2-BENZANTHRACENE
CHLORODIBROMOHETHANE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
METHYL BROMIDE
1t3-DICHLQROPROPYLENE
INDENO PYRENE
BERYLLIUM
IBOPHORONE
HEXACHLORGBENZENE
BENZO (A)PYRENE
ACENAPHTHENE
11,12-BENZOFLUORANTHENE
BIS<2-CIILOROETHYOXY> METHANE
lr!2-BENZOPERYLENE
lr2(5r6-DIBENZANTHRACENE
3,4-BENZOFLUORANTHENE
ALPRIN
PCB-1254
4.4'-DDD
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
DIELDRIN
2r«-DINITROTOLUENE
OHLOROETHANE
NUMBER OF
SAMPLES
ANALYZED
152
152
132
152
152
152
152
152
152
146
146
152
152
152
152
152
141
146
146
150
152
152
152
152
152
152
152
PERCENT
OF TIMES
DETECTED
5
5
5
4
4
4
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1









UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UG/L
UO/L
UG/L
UG/L
NG/L
NG/L
NG/L
NG/L
NG/L
UG/L
UG/L
MINIMUM(l)
1
1
1
5
5
1
45
18
4
5
1
5
1
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5000
3400
310
230
30
5
3
MAXIMUM
31
12
5
5
5
2
1000
130
8
5
4
18
20
10
5
5
5
35
5
5
5000
5500
770
500
40
8
5

-------
                                                TABLE  3  (CONT.)

                                       OCCURRENCE OF PRIORITY  POLLUTANTS
                                           IN POTW INFLUENT SAMPLES
00
£*
A
ro
oo
         PARAMETER


         THALLIUM
         BETA-BHC
         DELTA-BHC
         1•2-DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE
         2r4-DINITROPHENOL
         ACENAPHTHYLENE
         HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
         2r6-DINITROTOLUENE
         BROHOFORH
NUMBER OF PERCENT
SAMPLES OF TIMES
ANALYZED DETECTED UNITS
146 UO/L
152
152
152
152
152
NO/L
NO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
152 1 UO/L
152 1 UO/L
152 1 UO/L
MINIMUM(l)
4
1000
500
10
7
5
5
5
1
MAXIMUM
A
1000
500
10
7
5
5
5
1
             (1)   MINIMUM  OF  VALUES  ABOVE  DETECTION  LIMIT  ONLY
             PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY-TO BE VERIFIED

-------
                                                   TABLE  4

                                      OCCURRENCE  OF PRIORITY  POLLUTANTS
                                     IN  POTU SECONDARY  EFFLUENT SAMPLES
00
CT
A
PARAMETER

ZINC
COPPER
CYANIDE
BIS<2-ETHYLHEXYL> PHTHALATE
HETHYLENE CHLORIDE
CHLOROFORM
CHROMIUM
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
NICKEL
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
1.1t1-TRICHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
CADMIUM
GAHMA-BHC
LEAD
MERCURY
SILVER
PHENOL
BENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
DICHLOROBROMOMETHANE
1,2-TRANS-DICHLOROETHYLENE
ANTIMONY
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
ARSENIC
NUMBER OF PERCENT
SAMPLES OF TIHE8
ANALYZED DETECTED UNITS MINIMUMU)
130
130
126
129
130
130
130
130
130
129
130
130
130
130
130
130
129
130
129
130
130
130
130
130
129
129
130
129
130
98
96
94
91
88
88
84
82
81
59
57
54
48
37
36
35
33
28
27
21
21
19
15
15
14
13
13
12
12
UG/L
UO/L
UG/L
UQ/L
UO/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
NG/L
UG/L
NG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
21
3
2
2
1
1
2
0
11
1
1
1
0
2
10
20
200
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
MAXIMUM
1200
243
2211
370
1570
61
178
320
579
92
370
97
1100
G2
840
217
1100
19
89
29
11
5
12
69
52
6
11
10
72

-------
                                                  TABLE 4 (COMT.)
                                         OCCURRENCE OF PRIORITY POLLUTANTS
                                        IN POTW SECONDARY EFFLUENT SAMPLES
00
O
A
PARAMETER


1f2-DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLORODIBROHOMETHANE
ALPHA-BHC
SELENIUM
METHYL CHLORIDE
ANTHRACENE
PHENANTHRENE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1t1-DICHLOROETHANE
1t4-DICHLOROBENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
NAPHTHALENE
i»3-DICHLOROBENZENE
2r4-DICHLOROPHENOL
BETA-BHC
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
PYRENE
CHRYSENE
1,2-BENZANTHRACENE
PCB-1242
BERYLLIUM
1F1»2r2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
CHLOROBENZENE
1r 2-DICHLOROPROPANE
ACENAPHTHENE
DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
FLUORANTHENE
NUMBER OF PERCENT
SAMPLES OF TIMES
ANALYZED DETECTED UNITS HINIMUH(i)
12?
130
130
130
130
129
129
130
130
129
130
130
129
129
129
130
130
129
129
129
130
130
130
130
130
120
129
129
129
9
0
e
e
7
6
6
5
5
5
5
5
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
UO/L
UO/L
NO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
NO/L
UO/L
UG/L
UO/L
UO/L
NO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
1
1
20
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
5
5
1
40
1
5


75<





5
5
5
HAXIMUM
27
5
740
103
440
32
32
200
3
9
47
14
5
5
3
70
e
5
5
5
2600
12
5
3
1
2
13
5
5

-------
                                            TABLE 4 (CONT. )
                                   OCCURRENCE OF PRIORITY POLLUTANTS
                                  IN POTW SECONDARY EFFLUENT SAMPLES
00
            PARAMETER
2-NITROPMENQL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENQL
PARACHLOROMETA CRESOL
2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
ALDRIN
It12-BENZOPERYLENE
4-NITROPHENOL
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
ISOPHORONE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
3r3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
FLUORENE
2,4-DINTTROTOLUENE
HETHYL BROMIDE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
INDENOU,2r3-CfD> PYRENE
lf2ISf6-DIBENZANTHRACENE
2-CHLOROPHENOL
4.6-DINITRO-O-CRESOL
HEPTACHLQR EPOXIDE
PCB-1254
4>4'-DDD
CIILORDANE
DIELDRIN
HEPTACHLOR
1r1f2-TRICMLOROETMANE
NUMBER OF PERCENT
SAMPLES OF TIMES
ANALYZED DETECTED UNITS MINIMUMU)
129 2 UO/L
129 2 UO/L
129 2 UO/L
129 2 UQ/L
130 2 NO/L
123 2 UO/L
129 2 UG/L
129 2 UO/L
129 2 UG/L
129 2 UO/L
129 2 UG/L
129 2 UO/L
129 2 UG/L
130 2 UG/L
130 2 UG/L
123
123
129
129
130
130
130
130
130
130
UG/L
UO/L
UO/L
UG/L
NG/L
NG/L
NG/L
NG/L
NG/L
NG/L
130 1 UG/L
3
2
1
1
1000
4
S
7
S
5
S
1
1
37
58
5
5
S
2
500
500
230
200
40
30
6
MAXIMUM
5
5
4
1
5000
4
100
10
12
5
5
5
2
190
58
5
5
5
2
500
500
230
200
40
30
&
            (l)MINIMUM OF VALUES ABOVE DETECTION LIMIT ONLY
            PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY-TO BE VERIFIED
            TWO SECONDARY EFFLUENTS INCLUDED FOR PLANTS  10 AND  17

-------
                                                    TABLE  5

                                       OCCURRENCE  OF PRIORITY POLLUTANTS
                                          IN  POTH  RAW  SLUDGE SAMPLES
00
00
A
PARAMETER

CYANIDE
COPPER
ZINC
CADMIUM
SILVER
CHROMIUM
NICKEL
TOLUENE
LEAD
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
ARSENIC
ANTIMONY
SELENIUM
MERCURY
ETHYLBENZENE
BENZENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
1f2-TRANS-DICHLOROETHYLENE
ANTHRACENE
PHENANTHRENE
PHENOL
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
PYRENE
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
1*1-DICHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
FLUORANTHENE
NAPHTHALENE
BERYLLIUM
NUMBER OF PERCENT
SAMPLES OF TIMES
ANALYZED DETECTED UNITS MINIMUM(l)
200
200
201
200
200
200
200
203
201
203
202
193
194
199
205
205
205
205
203
203
203
201
203
203
203
205
205
203
203
202
98
98
98
98
97
96
95
95
95
95
94
89
80
78
73
69
63
62
53
53
52
50
46
45
42
42
37
34
33
32
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UG/L
UO/L
UG/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
NO/L
UO/L
UG/L
UO/L
UG/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UG/L
UO/L
UG/L
UO/L
UG/L
UO/L
UO/L
UG/L
UG/L
60
100
410
12
15
110
12
1
80
20
5
3
5
110
1
1
1
1
6
6
19
1
6
14
4
1
1
8
11
2
MAXIMUM
245000
180000
1100000
95000
6450
160000
84000
42300
170000
35000
6000
200O
140000
690000
4200
694
3308
96000
3200
3200
17000
4690
1700
1600
45000
2885
2800
1200
5200
65

-------
                                                   TABLE  5  (CONT. )
                                          OCCURRENCE OF PRIORITY  POLLUTANTS
                                              IN POTU RAW  SLUDGE  SAMPLES
OD
     CJ
     CJ
PARAMETER


 1 r 2-BENZANTHRACENE
 CHRY8ENE
 VINYL CHLORIDE
 1»1•1-TRICHLOROE THANE
 1f1»2t2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
 CHLOROBENZENE
 CHLOROFORM
 THALLIUM
 1» 2-DICHLOROPRQPANE
 lr4-DICHLOROBENZENE
 DICHLOROBROMOMETHANE
 li2~DICHLOROBENZENE
 TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
 CHLOROETHANE
 METHYL  CHLORIDE
 1r2>4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
 PENTACHLOROPHENOL
 DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
 1r3-DICHLOROBENZENE
 FLUORENE
 DIETHYL PHTHALATE
 3r4-B£NZOFLUORANTHENE
 1r 1-DICHLOROETIIYLENE
 METHYL  BROMIDE
 CHLORODIBROMOMETHANE
 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
 CARBON  TETRACHLORIDE
 ACENAPHTIIENE
 DI-N-OCTYL  PHTHALATE
NUMBER OF PERCENT
SAMPLES OF TIHES
ANALYZED DETECTED UNITS MINIHUMU)
203
202
204
205
203
205
205
200
204
203
205
203
205
205
205
203
203
205
203
203
203
203
205
200
204
203
205
203
203
26
25
19
18
1<4
15
15
14
13
12
12
10
10
9
9
8
8
8
7
7
7
6
5
5
5
4
4
3
3
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UG/L
UO/L
UO/L
U6/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UG/L
9
9
8






34
7
20
2
5
10
38
10
7
38
31
27
2
1
33
10
14
5
6
37
MAXIMUM
1500
1500
42000
1900
1044
290
40
31
103
12000
260
1319
113
71000
6100
950
6000
4300
1900
1300
786
2400
14000
30000
75
298
940
4600
1024

-------
                                                 TABLE 5  (CONT.)

                                        OCCURRENCE OF PRIORITY POLLUTANTS
                                            IN POTW RAW SLUDGE SAMPLES
o
A
PARAMETER


2-CHLOROPHENOL
lrlr2-TRICHLOROETHANE
11F12-BENZOFLUORANTHENE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
ACRYLONITRILE
lr2-DICHLOROETHANE
BENZO  (A)PYRENE
2 F 4 F 6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
1»12-BENZOPERYLENE
1F215r6-DIBENZANTHRACENE
INDENO(l»2f3-C»D) PYRENE
4.4'-DDE
1F 3-DICHLOROPROPYLENE
NUMBER OF PERCENT
SAMPLES OF TIMES
ANALYZED DETECTED UNITS
203
203
204
203
203
205
205
203
203
203
203
203
203
203
203
205
205
3
3
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1

-------
                                  VI.

                   EVALUATION OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS


 IMPACT OF INDUSTRIAL CONTRIBUTION ON INFLUENT QUALITY

 The amount of Industrial discharge to the 20 POTW's ranged from  less  than  5
 percent  to  a maximum  of  50 percent of  their  average flow  (see Table  1).
 Review of the  influent priority  pollutant  data reveals  that,  1n general,
 the higher  the  industrial  contribution, the greater  the  concentration  and
 to a  lesser extent  the greater  the  occurrence of priority  pollutants in
 POTW  Influents.   Figure 1  1s a  plot  of  the  sum of influent priority pollu-
 tant  metal  concentrations  versus percent industrial  contribution.  Although
 there is a  fair  amount of data point scatter,  the  least  squares fit has a
 large positive  slope  (R=0.491, slope  - 72.86  ug/1/%).   This  indicates a
 tendency  for  total   metals   concentrations  to   increase   when  percent
 industrial  flow  increases.   The fits were not as good  for  the sums of other
 priority  pollution  fraction   sums  (organics,   volatiles,   base-neutrals,
 acids).   This may be because a  straight  line does  not describe the data or
 because  of  inaccuracies in  the  percent  industrial  figures.

 TREATMENT OR REMOVAL OF PRIORITY POLLUTANTS  IN  POTW's

 In the Appendix,  Figures  A-l  to  A-8  present cumulative  distributions  for
 the percent  removal  and effluent concentrations for the 24  priority  pollu-
 tants  most  prominent in POTW  influents.   Table 6 summarizes  the data pre-
 sented  in Appendix  A for pollutants where 10  or  more usable  data  points  are
 available.   In  Table 6  and  Appendix  A,  percent removals  are  presented  for
 two subgroups of  analytical  data:   removals when  the priority  pollutant
 level  in the influent  was  measured at  a plant  average level  greater  than
 zero,  and removals when the plant average influent  pollutant  concentration
 was always  measured above  10 ug/1.   In  Table 6, the number of data  points
 for each  subgroup  is  indicated  by  N.  Minimum percent  removals and effluent
 levels can be read  directly  from Appendix A figures  for any  desired percent
 of POTW's in  the data base.

 Table 6  shows that,  when present at any measurable  level,  50  percent  of  the
 POTW's  samples  achieved minimum priority pollutant metal  removals  ranging
 roughly between 32 and  81 percent.  For common organic  priority pollutants,
 50  percent  of the  POTW's  achieved minimum removal  between  53 and 90  per-
 cent.

 Figure 2  presents  cumulative  distributions   for  the  three  major  priority
pollutant fractions.  These  curves summarize  the data  presented in Appendix
A  and in  Table 6.   In Figure 2, all less-than values  were averaged as  zero
                                     35

                                   91-

-------
                                 FIGURE 1


                   CORRELATION OF INFLUENT TOTAL METALS
                 CONCENTRATION TO PERCENT INDUSTRIAL FLOW
    10000
                                 I      I
                                                   I      I      I
      8000
      6000
 o
I
4)
O
O
     4000
     2000
                         10
20          30


Industrial Flow
                                                              4 0
5 0
                                   36

-------
                                                                          TABLE  6
                                                 SUMMARY OF PERCENT  REMOVALS  ACHIEVED  BY  SECONDARY  TREATMENT
CO
CJ
A
Influents > 0 Mg/l
Percent of

50
75
Plants
80

90


Influents
2 10 Mg/l


Percent Removal
N
20
20
20
20
20
18
19
20
20
20
20
20
19
20
20
18
17
19
20
20

91
91
82
77
71
85
81
54
53
80
90
85
71
81
53
52
55
32
71
78

83
87
76
46
62
82
70
31
33
50
67
71
67
68
0
0
0
17
50
66

83
84
71
45
61
69
50
27
33
25
57
50
64
64
0
0
0
9
43
65

79
74
62
40
59
38
0
0
0
0
25
0
44
59
0
0
0
0
0
55
Median
91
92
83
77
71
86
61
55
53
82
92
86
73
82
54
53
55
32
73
80
N
20
20
20
20
20
16
12
16
18
15
17
16
19
20
20
18
17
18
10
20
Median
91
92
83
77
71
88
89
55
60
86
94
90
75
82
54
55
55
32
81
80
Parameter

BOO
TSS
COD
Total Phenols
TOC

1,1,1 Trtchloroethane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Bis  (2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
Trichloroethylene

Chromium
Copper
Cyanide
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Silver
Zinc

Notes:   Plant averages used as basis for percent removal  calculation.
         N - Number of ddta points Included.
         Values reported below their detection limit  were  averaged  as  0 In Influents,
         and as the detection limit In effluents.

-------
                                            FIGURE 2


                                   CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION CURVES
                ACID BASE / NEUTRALS      VOLATILES

              1OOn	,   1OO
                                   METALS
CO
CD
5O      1OO
            SO
                          100
                                                                   so
       o *.  *  *  ' * *  *  *  *  *
100     o
so       100
            ,-. 1OO
            A
            o

            V
            at
               SO
          eg
          «t 5   o
          UJO   V
100
 so
                                        too
                                         50
                  O       SO      1OO      O       SO      1OO     O


                                                  % of Plants
                                      so      100
         Notes:  A11  less than values averaged as 0.

-------
to  avoid attaching  significance  to  pollutants  that were  not present  in
either  the  Influent  or effluent  samples.   This  procedure will  slightly
overstate removal  of  pollutants  measured near  their detection Unrit,  but
these  cases have  minimal   Impact on  the  totals  presented 1n  Figure  2.

REDUCTION OF PRIORITY  POLLUTANTS  BY POTU  TREATMENT PROCESSES

Table  7  summarizes  the average of the  individual  POTW  percent  removals for
selected  conventional  and  priority pollutants achieved  by  the  major treat-
ment  processes.   For  pure  oxygen activated  sludge,  one plant's  data  are
included.   Primary  and tertiary effluents were  sampled  at  two  plants while
twelve activated  sludge processes and  three  trickling filter processes were
evaluated.

Table  7  shows  that among the treatment processes  examined,  tertiary treat-
ment   removed  16  of  24 priority  pollutants  better  than either  trickling
filter or  activated  sludge processes.   For  pure oxygen activated  sludge
processes,  less  than   half  of the  removals  (10  of 24)  were  higher  than
either trickling  filter  or activated  sludge  removals.  Three-quarters  of
the trickling  filter  removals  (18 of  24)  were  better than the corresponding
activated sludge  removals.  Primary treatment appears  to be generally less
effective than secondary  treatment processes  in  removing  the 24  selected
priority pollutants.

At  two of  the  POTW's  (10  and  17), parallel activated  sludge and  trickling
filter  plants  treated  common  influent   streams.   At  both  plants,  the
effluent streams  were completely separate allowing for  a true comparison of
removal  efficiencies.   The trickling  filter  and activated  sludge conven-
tional pollutant  removals  were  all  within  six  percentage  points  of  each
other.  For the  32  priority pollutants measured  in  the  influents, 13 were
treated  to the same  degree by  both  processes,  8  priority  pollutants  were
better removed  by activated sludge,  11 were  better removed  by the trickling
filter process.   The  only  priority  pollutants  that had  large  differences
between   trickling  filter   and   activated   sludge  removals  were  tetrach-
loroethylene  (trickling filter  13 points  higher) and  chromium  (activated
sludge 34 points  higher).

PQTW  PRIORITY  POLLUTANT MASS BALANCES

As  described  in Section V,  mass  balances  for  each conventional,  nonconven-
tional,  and priority  pollutant  are  included in  Appendix A,   In  these mass
balance  tables, pollutants  biodegraded or otherwise treated should  show a
lower  mass  exiting  the plant  than  entering  it.   For  conservative  pollu-
tants,  such as metals,  which  cannot  be  degraded, but only  transferred  to
sludge streams,  in  theory  the  mass  balances should  show the same  pounds
into  the  plant  as  leaving  it.   Table  8 summarizes the mass  balance  for five
POTW's where the  percent difference between  total  pounds  of  total  metals in
the  incoming  and  outgoing  streams were within ten percent.  At  these five
plants,  it  is assumed that  the balances  for  all  other  pollutants  arg
equally  accurate.
                                   95 <

-------
                 Fraction
                 Conventional*
                 Organlei
0-3
 /\
                 Metals
                                                                        TABLE  7
                                      REDUCTION OF CONVENTIONAL AND PRIORITY POLLUTANTS BY POTW TREATMENT PROCESSES
                                                                                         Percent Removal
          Parameter
BOD
Total Suspended Solids
COD
011 and Grease

Benzene
1,1,1 - Trlchloroethane
Chloroform
1,2 - Trans-Dlchloroothylene
Ethyl benzene
Methyl one Chloride
Tetrachloroethyl ene
Toluene
TrIchloroethylene
Phenol
Naphthalene
Bis (2-Etnylhexyl) Phtholate
Butyl Benzyl Phthai ate
DI-N-Butyl Phthlate
Dlethyl Phthlate

Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Cyanide
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Silver
Zinc
Pr Imary
Treatment(l)
17
39
13
52
23
47
23
66
25
14
-
-
30
55
0
-
36
99*
II
_
0
24
57
-
-
-
17
27
Trickling
Fllter(2)
93
94
62
69
96
92
60
98
92
47
78
87
96
96
99+
54
97
0
96
74
74
89
81
94
99+
25
95
80
Activated
SludgeO)
95
94
90
89
95
87
79
57
92
77
82
71
89
13
28
78
48
31
10
92
91
90
71
74
54
60
83
86
Activated
SludgeM)
90
88
80
90
99+
38
It
99+
80
27
-
96
44
99+
99+
40
99+
99+
99+
99+
76
84
53
99+
86
18
99+
83
Tertiary
TreatroentCS)
95
98
91
71
99+
99
25
99+
98
92
98
99
99
99
-
60
99+
64
99+
99+
87
88
-
97
86
51
99+
87
                 (I) Two Plant data base
                 (2) Three Plant data base
                  (3) Seventeen plant data base
                  (4) One plant data base
(5) Three plant data base

-------
                                            TABLE 8





                                     Mass Balance Summary





                                         (Pounds/Day)
Metals
                      Total Organic;
Volatlles
                                                                              Base Neutrals
                                                                                                        Process




s
-01
A


Plant No. In
2 35.9
5 97.2
7 649
£ II 510.2
20 936.8

Out
32.6
91.5
610.2
549.1
917.6

I
-9
-6
-6
+8
-2

In
6.6
176.3
155.4
185.3
320.1

Percent

Out Difference In
4.9
103.2
80.2
45.3
80.8
-26
-41
-48
-76
-75
3.2
168.9
64.6
159.3
263.2

Percent
Out Difference
2.3
95
23.2
19.6
45.1
-28
-44
-64
-88
-83

is.
3.4
7.4
90.8
26
56.9

Percent
Out Difference
2.6 -24
8.2
57
25.7
35.7
til
-37
-1
-37

Activated Sludge
Activated Sludge
Activated Sludge
Trickling Filter
Activated Sludge

-------
 Table  8  shows  that total  priority  pollutant  metals  mass  deficiencies ranged
 between  a gain  of  eight percent  and  a loss  of  nine percent,  while total
 organics  were  always lost.   For  total  organic priority  pollutants, losses
 ranged between 26 and 76 percent.

 For  the  total  volatile  priority pollutants, mass was  always  lost.   For the
 volatiles,  percent  loses ranged between  28  and 88 percent.   For the base-
 neutral  priority pollutants,  mass  balance differences ranges  between a gain
 of 11 percent  and  a 37  percent  loss.   At  each  plant,  more  organics were
 lost  than  metals and more volatiles  were  lost  than  either total  organics or
 base-neutrals.

 The  results discussed  above  support the concept  that  metals  are  conser-
 vative in  a  treatment  process  while  organics are  either biodegraded  or
 otherwise  lost.  The greater loss of volatiles compared  to  total  organics
 or base-neutrals also  supports the idea that  volatiles may be stripped out
 of the wastewater during aeration  in  addition  to  being biodegraded.

 DAILY  VARIATION OF INFLUENT POLLUTANT CONCENTRATIONS

 Table  9  presents the daily average concentration  of  selected conventional
 and  nonconventional  pollutants and the sum  of  the  toxic  pollutant  analyti-
 cal  fraction   concentrations  in influent  samples.    With the exception  of
 Sundays,  at least  one 24-hour  composite  influent sample  was  taken  on each
 day  of the  week at each  POTW, providing a minimum of  20  data  points  to make
 up the average for each  parameter.  Less  than  ten  Sunday  samples were taken
 and these were mostly 8-hour  composites at Plant  1.

 Table  9  does  not reveal  any  particular concentration trend among the five
 working  days.    None of  the  five days of  the week  showed a consistently
 higher or lower concentration.  However,  for every  toxic  pollutant fraction
 (except  pesticides)  as  well  as BOD and COD, the  Friday  and Monday averages
 were  always  higher   thair the  Saturday  or  Sunday  average.  The  Sunday data
 should be  viewed cautiously  because of the  abbreviated data  base it repre-
 sents.   Comparing   averages  for  the  five  working days  with  the  weekend
 levels,  in  each case the work week average  was higher than any  Saturday or
 Sunday average.

 EFFECT OF RAINFALL

 During the  week of  sampling  at five  of the 20 POTW's, at  least one day of
 heavy  rainfall  occurred.   Table  10  presents   the  influent total  priority
 pollutant metals loadings at  these plants  before  and  after the rainfall day
 and the  average of  all  other days'  loadings.  Three of  these  five plants
 have  combined  sewers,   one  has separate  sewers,  one  is   half combined and
 half separate.   At  Plants 4,  6 and  14, it was raining on  the first day of
 sampling; at the other two plants, at least  one day of dry weather sampling
was completed  before rainfall  began.
                                     42

                                     98<

-------
                 TABLE 9

 DAILY AVERAGE CONCENTRATIONS
OF POLLUTANTS IN POTW INFLUENTS




f rt
w
tO *>
A "



Fraction
BOD (ng/l)
COO <«g/l)
Phenols, Total (yg/l)
Volatile* (,ig/l)
Base Neutrals (jig/I)
Acids (|ig/l)
Toxic Metals (yg/l)
Pesticides (ng/l)

H
193
447
94
536
98
30
1646
424

T
196
523
77
598
57
20
1778
2171

W
206
401
80
1047
90
10
1835
2178

Th
204
575
108
450
74
18
(882
2743

	 f_
182
546
216
401
72
24
1819
330

Sa
150
362
64
243
65
14
1123
1344

Su
121
250
55
36^
49
7
520
0
W-F
Average
196
496
IIS
606
78
20
1792
1569

-------
                                  TABLE  10

                             EFFECT OF RAINFALL
                          ON  INFLUENT METALS LOADING
                                    Inf1uent Pounds of Total  Metals
PLANT NO.

    4

    6

    9

   14

   18
    SEWER
    TYPE

50% Combined

Separate

Combined

Combined

Combined
 DAY OF
  HEAVY
RAINFALL

  1287

   354

   197

   171

   825
DAY AFTER
 HEAVY
RAINFALL

  402

  336

  101

  125

  250
  AVERAGE
  OF ALL
OTHER DAYS

    391

    547

    231

    151

    271
                                 44

                                100<

-------
Table 10 shows  that  at each plant  with  combined sewers the  loading  on the
day  of  heavy  rainfall was  significantly  higher  than  the  loading  on  the
following  day.   At  the  one POTW with separate  sewers, the  loading  on the
day  after  rainfall  was only marginally  lower.  Table  10  also  presents the
average of  influent  total  metals loadings.  For three  of  the four combined
sewer plants, this loading  was  lower  than  the  heavy  rainfall  day's loading.
At  Plant 6,  which has separate  sewers,  the average of other days was con-
siderably higher-

FORMATION OF CHLORINATED HYDROCARBONS

Table 11 presents  a  summary of occurrences where the  secondary  or tertiary
chlorinated  effluent had a higher  concentration of  a  chlorinated  hydrocar-
bon    than   the    corresponding   prechloMnated    secondary    effluent.
Inconsequential  data points were excluded  from  consideration by specifying
that the  post  chlorinated sample had to exceed  the  prechlorinated sample's
detection  limit.   Most of  the pollutants in Table 11 with less  than  ten
reported   occurrences   of   higher  chlorinated  hydrocarbon  levels  can  be
explained  by some normal degree  of variation  between  concentrations  within
the  same   order of magnitude.    Control  tests  run  on  some  frequently
occurring  nonchlorinated compounds  also  indicated  several  instances of con-
centration increase  through chlorination.

For chloroform, there were 28  instances  where  it increased in concentration
through the chlorination process.  The  average prechlorinated concentration
was 5 ug/1 for  these  occurrences,  and the  average  chlorinated  effluent was
14  ug/1.    For  dlchlorobromomethane,  there  were  16  instances  where  it
increased  (from 2 ug/1 to 9 ug/1, average).  Methylene chloride, gamnia-3CH,
and chlorodibromomethane also  increased  more  often  than can  be  explained by
random  variation.

POLLUTANTS DETECTED  IN SLUDGES  WHEN NOT  MEASURED IN  THE INFLUENT

Table 12  presents a summary of the priority  pollutants that were detected
in one or  more sludge streams  but were not  detected  in  the corresponding
influent  sample.    In  many  cases  this  occurs  because  the influent  con-
centrations were too  low  to be  measured,  but the  pollutant may  have con-
centrated  sufficiently in  the  sludge  stream to be  quantified.  For examole,
arsenic and antimony were  both  detected  in less  than 20 percent of all POTW
influent   samples.    However,   both  were  detected  consistently  in  sludge
streams.   Arsenic was  detected 56  times  in a primary  sludge at an average
concentration  of 397 ug/l  when  it was not  detected  in the  influent.  It was
also detected  39 times  1n  combined sludges (85 ug/l  average)  and 60 times
in secondary sludges (331  ug/1) under the  same conditions.
                                     45

-------
                                 TABLE  11
                     FORMATION  OF  CHLORINATED HYDROCARBONS
                         DURING CHLORINE  DISINFECTION
     Parameter

1,1,1, Trichloroethane
Chloroform
1,1, Dichloroethylene
Methylene Chloride
Methyl Chloride
Dichlorobromomethane
Chlorodibromomethane
Tetrachloroethylene
Trichloroethylene
Aldrin (ng/1)
Gamma-BHC (ng/1)
Number of Occurrences

          3
         28
          3
         15
          2
         16
         10
          9
          5
          5
         11
Prechlorinated
   Effluent
    Average^)

        27
         5
         1
        28
       195
         2
         1
         9
         7
      1200
        53
Chlorinated
 Effluent
  Average^)

     33
     14
      3
     45
    390
      9
     10
     13
     12
   4400
    109
(1) All  units ug/1  unless  otherwise noted.
                                     46
                                       102<

-------
                                    TABLE 12

                    SUMMARY OF PRIORITY POLLUTANT KCURRENCE
                     IN SLUDGE WHEN NOT DETECTED IN INFLUENT
        Pollutant

Arsenic
Antimony
Selenium
Pyrene
Anthracene/Phenanthrene
Benzo anthracene/chrysene
Fluoranthene
Beryl!ium
Cadmium
Benzene
1,2-trans Olchloroethylene
D1-n-butyl Phthalate
Vinyl Chloride
Butyl Benzyl Phthalate
Chlorobenzene
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,2-01chloropropane
Mercury
Lead
Naphthalene
Ethyl benzene
Nickel
Chloroethane
Methyl Chloride
Oi chlorofluoromethane
No. of Times
Detected in any
Sludge





!




ie




»









Stream(l)
94
91
91
73
72
52
52
47
39
38
38
34
31
29
29
25
25
24
22
22
21
19
19
16
15
Avg. Cone.
In Primary
Sludge(l)
397 (56)
221 (53)
123 (47)
190 (31)
350 (33)
388 (20)
152 (21)
22 (22)
425 (26)
9 (25)
504 (30)
354 (21)
2120 (17)
1260 (15)
13 (9)
467 (12)
9 (7)
93 (13)
12100 (9)
259 (9)
180 (13)
4960 (13)
12400 (8)
287 (6)
775 (6)
Avg. Cone.
In Combined
Sludge(l)
85 (39)
42 (31)
43 (26)
60 (13)
1590 (7)
39 (5)
48 (10)
9 (8)
95 (26)
2 (14)
37 (11)
88 (6)
260 (7)
487 (4)
6 (6)
8 (10)
(0)
31 (18)
1700 (13)
313 (3)
4 (5)
1740 (9)
2060 (2)
15 (2)
46 (6)
Avg. Cone.
In Secondary
Sludged)
331 (60)
303 (59)
1340 (57)
180 (45)
411 (40)
177 (30)
140 (34)
15 (43)
436 (17)
79 (18)
706 (11)
555 (14)
1820 (9)
804 (11)
81 (20)
37 (10)
31 (18)
135 (13)
8630 (15)
755 (11)
337 (12)
4440 (9)
1490 (12)
98 (10)
633 (6)
Note:    All concentrations are in ug/1.
         Values in parentheses are the- number of such occurrences,

         (1) When not detected in influent.
                                       47

                                   103 <

-------
The  pollutants  in  Table  12  include  metals,  volatile  and  base  neutral
priority  pollutants.   Those with the  highest  concentration in  the  primary
sludge  when  not  found  in  the  influent  were  chloroethane,  lead,  nickel,
vinyl  chloride,  and butyl-benzyl  phthalate.    These  five pollutants  and
selenium  also had the  highest  average concentration in  secondary  sludges.
The  same  five pollutants plus naphthalene and  anthracene/phenanthrene were
also the  highest  in  combined  sludge  streams.

CORRELATION OF  INFLUENT AND EFFLUENT CONCENTRATIONS

For  all  of the  priority pollutants  that occurred in  over 50  percent of the
influent   samples,  the  correlation   between  plant  average  influent  con-
centration and  effluent  concentration was tested.   Table 13 presents  the
results for metal  and volatile  priority pollutants.   For  the  acid  and base-
neutral  fractions,  no  meaningful correlations  were calculated.    This  is
probably  because  the individual  pollutants in these  fractions were  present
at  very  low levels;  frequently below or near their  detection  limits.  Only
bis-2-ethylhexyl  phthalate had an average  influent concentration of  over 20
ug/1.   Its  regression   coefficient  was 0.581  with   a  slope  0.325   and  an
intercept  of 8.5.    For several  other parameters  the  correlations  were
excellent,  and  on average  they were  good,  considering the  data  base inclu-
des only  20 plants.

For all metals  except mercury,  the  slope  of the line computed by  the least
squares fit  was  between 0.04 and 0.52, indicating that half or more of an
incremental   increase   in   influent   concentration  would   be  removed.
Interestingly, the  highest  slope was  obtained  for  nickel, which also  had
the lowest median removal of the common heavy metals  (see Table  6).

The volatile  priority pollutants exhibited the  same general  tendencies  as
the metals.   Correlation coefficients  ranged  between 0.262 and  0.937.   The
slopes of the best fit line ranged between 0.03 and  0.8.

Based on  the  data in Table 13, it is  reasonable  to  conclude that for  many
priority  pollutants  an  increase in  the influent  concentration will  result
in an increase in effluent concentration.
                                    48

                                    104<

-------
                    TABLE 13



CORRELATION OF INFLUENT AND EFFLUENT CONCENTRATION
Correlation
Coefficient
Metals (R)
Cadmium
Nickel
Zinc
Copper
Cyanide
Chromium
Lead
Si 1 ver
Mercury
Volatiles
Tetrachloroethylene
Trichloroethylene
Chi oroform
Trichloroethane
Toluene
Dichloroethylene
Methyl ene Chloride
Ethyl benzene
0.995
0.915
0.834
0.657
0.633
0,573
0.509
0.204
-0.13
0.937
0.891
0.886
0.778
0.749
0.616
0.324
0.262
Slope of
Best Fit
Line
0.058
0.515
0.105
0.074
0.225
0.040
0.175
0.048
-0.062
0.317
0.099
0.529
0. 157
0.804
0.148
0.072
0.033
Intercept
2.7
16.2
52.1
17.3
113
22.3
24.9
2.46
459
-3.91
2.23
0.64
0.27
-20.5
2.23
33.4
1.88
                     49

-------
                                                                 FIGURE A-1
                              Benzene
                                                                   1,1.1,- Trichloroethane
                                                                                                   Chloroform
h^
O

 A
.en
o
          A\

          !
                  100
                    °'|  I  I  I  M I  I  I

                      0   20   40   60   80   100
         0.

                         When two curves are presented, dashed line - Plants with influent average

                         concentration >10.
   MINIMI
0    20  40   60   80  100
                                                                                         30 _ .,
o


c
r~


•-«

3

O   >

t/>   ~o
—I   m
70   z
»-.   o
CO   l-i
                                                                                                                           o

                                                                                                                           ya
   III  I  I
0    20   40   60   80   100

-------
                                                                                 FIGURE A 2
                                1.2 Trans Diclilofoulliylene
H-
S5
 A
                 I
                 en

       Elhylbonzene
                              0    20   40   60   80   100
   I  I  I  I  I  I   I  I '|
0    20   40   60    BO  100
                              0   20   40   60    80  100
   I  I  I  I  I   I   I  I  I
    20  40    60    80  100
                                                                                                     100
    Meihylene Chloride
   Mil   11   I  i  0
0   20   40   60    80  100
0    20   40   60    80   100
                                                                             % of Plants
                Nolus:    Nunibur adjacent to cuivo represents mmibor of dula points includud.
                          Solid line - Plants with influuitt avoraye concenlralions>0.
                          Mfhon two curv/us iiio prusentud, dashed line - Plants with influunl average
                          concentration > 10.

-------
                               Tetrachloroethylene
                             I  I  I   I  I  I  I  I  I

                           0   20   40   60   80  100
                                                          100
                                                FIGURE A-3


                                             toluene
                                         I  I  I  I I  I   I  I I
                                                                            Trichloroelhylene
                                           20  40   60   80   100
   11111)111

0   20   40   60   80   100
      en
      to
G
00
A
       a
3   3

£   S
              Notes:
160
•
120 -
90 -
60 -
30 .
0 "
0



V0
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 '
20 40 60 80 10
                                  300


                                  240


                                  180-f


                                  120--


                                  100 I


                                    0


                                      0
                                                                    20






                                                                I  I  I  I  I I  III'

                                                                  20   40   60   80  100



                                                                      % of Plants
Number adjacent to curve represents number of data points included.

Solid line - Plants with influent average concentrations>0.

When two curves are presented, dashed line - Plants with influent

average concentration >10.
   11  rrrrm=
     20   40  60   80   100

-------
                                                                                FIGURE A 4
                                         Phenol
                                            Bis(2 Elhylhexyl) Phthalate
                                                                                                                  Naphthalene
o
o
 A
                   g



                   i
                   0)
                   a.
                   0)
                   u

                   g
                   O
                                    20   40    60   BO  100
100


 80



 60



 40



 20



  0
                               - - \-A   9
        I   I  I  iT I  I  14
                                0   20   40    60    80  100
                                              I  M  M  M  i
                                           0    20   40   60    80   100
                                                     40   60    BO   100
                                                                            % of Plants

                   Notes:   Number adjacent to curve represents number of data points included.

                            Sol nl 11 no - PUnls will) influent avtiruge concunlralions>0.

                            Wliun two cuivut> uiti piubunitjcl, (Jdbhod line - Plants with influent average

                            conctintralion >10.
10


 8 •+-


 6



 4



 2 _ .



 0
         I  )   I   M  I  I  I
                                                                                                                      40   60   80  100
       I  M   i  I  M  I  I

    0    20   40   60    flO  100

-------
                                                                            FIGURE A 5
                                Butyl Benzyl Phthalate
       Di-N-Butyl Phlhalate
 Dielhyl Phthalale
                6
                               (1111)111
                             0   20   40    60  80  100
0  '  I  I  Oil fM I
   0   20   40   60   80   100
  20   40   60   80   100
O
 A
                m
                g
            I
                               I   I  I   I   I  I  I   I  I

                             0   20   40    60   80  100
                                                              30 •+
       20   40   60    80  100
i  I  I  I  I  I  I  I  I

  20   40   60   80  100
                                                                           % of Plants

               Notes:    Number adjacent to curve represents number of data points Included.
                         Solid line - Plants with influent average concentrations'^.
                         When two curves are presented, dashed line - Plants With influent average
                         concentration > 10.

-------

.   s
c   c
0)   0)

-   g
£   o
ui   (j
                        Cadmium
  II II  II  Mi
0   20   40    60   80  100
            100
80--




60-




404




20




 0
     16
                  I  I  I  I  I  I  I  I  I


                0    20   40   60  80  100
                                              FIGURE A 6




                                          Chromium
                                               100
                                                0'MINIMI
                                                        20   40   60    80  100
                               20  - -
                                                     60   80   100
                                                           % of Plunls
    Notes:  Numbur adjacent (o curve represents number of data points included.


            Solid line - Plants  with influent averaoe concentrations > 0.


            When two curves are presented, dashed line - Plants with influent


            average concentiation'MO.
                                                                                 Copper
                                                                                  100
                                                                       o'   11  l  I  II  I  I  I

                                                                          0   20   40   60   80  100
20
                                                                      0   20   40   60   80   100

-------
                                                                              FIGURE A-7
                                        Cyanide
                                                             Lead
                  I
                                 I  I  I  I  I   I  I  I   I

                               0   20   40    60   80  100
                                                                100
                                                     I  1  M  M  I)  I
                                                                                                                 Mercury
                                                  0   20    40   60   80
I I  I  I  I  I  M  I
  20   40   60   80  100
fO
 A
        en
        CM
                  ft
                  M
                  c
                  o

       1000
                            0  'MINI
                               0   20   40    60   80   100
                                              20
                                                  0   20    40   60   80   100



                                                          % of Plants
Notes:
                           Number adjacent to curve represents number of data points included.

                           Solid line - Plants with influent average concentrations>0.

                           When two curves are presented, dashed line - Plants with influent average

                           concentration x-10.
I  I  I  I  I  I  I  I  I


   20   40   60    80   100

-------
                                                                                FIGURE A 8
                                        Nickel
                                                              Silver
                                                                                                                     Zinc
g
 A
                 !
                 0)
                 I
                 A
             -
             £   <§
                                 i   I  I   I   I   I  i  I
                              0    20   40    60   80   100
                              0    20   40    60   80   100
                                                               100
                                                       Mini   M
                                                    0   20   40   60    80   100
                                                       I  I  I  I  I  I   I  I  I
                                                    0   20    40   60    80  100
Notes:
                                                                            % of Plants
                           Number adjacent lo curve represents number of data points included.
                           Solid line -  Planls willi inllnonl uvuiuue concenlrtillons >0.
                           When two curves uie presunlud, dashud lino - Plants with influent average
                           concent) alien ^"10.
                                                                                     100
   I  I  I  I  M  I  I  I
0    20   40   60   80   100
     20    40   60   80   100

-------
                                               SUHCAhY UF ANALYTICAL  LAIA

                                                                1
FRACTION   PARAMETER

CONV.      BOO
           TOTAL SUSP. SOLIDS
           COD
           OIL C GRtASE

NUN-CDNV,  TOTAL PHENOLS
           TOTAL SOLIDS
           TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDS
           TOTAL VOL. SUS. SOLIDS
           AMMONIA NITROGEN
           TUC

VOLATILES  ACRYLUNITRILE
           BENZENE
           CARBON TETRACHLURItE
           CHLOROBEN2ENE
            ,2-DICHLORUETHANE
            ,1,1-TRICHLOROETMAIJE
            ,1-OICHLOROETHANE
            , 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
            HLOROFORH
            ,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE
            ,2-TiUNS-DICHLOROETHYLENE
           1,2-01CHLOROPRUPANE
           ETHYLBEN2ENE
           METMYLENE CHLORIDE
           METHYL CHLORIDE
           BROHOFORH
           01CHLOROBROMOHE T HANE
           TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
           CHLOR0010ROMOHETHANE
           TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
           TULUENE
           TRICHLOROETHYLENE

ACiOS.     2,4.6-TRlCHLOROPIIENOL
           PARACMLOROMETA CRESOL
           2-CHLOROPHENOL
           2t4-OIMETHYLPH£NOL
           PENTACHLOROPHENOL
           PHENOL

POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED HERE NEVER DETECTED
L-LESS THAN!    N-D  NOT OLTECTEDI
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY	TO BE VERIFIED
UMIS IKFLUtM
MG/L
HG/L
Ht/L
MG/L
UG/L
MG/l
MG/L
MG/L
MC/L
HG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
Ut/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
215
175
4i3
50
ISO
937
2S>2
113
7
2li>
L 100
1*3
1
1
0
IB
1
5
46
4
6
0
2b
12
0
0
0
0
0
51
21
2t
0
0
I 50
I 50
1
16


L

L
I
L

L
I



I


L
L


L



t
L




SllUNCiAKY PCNT
tf-fLULNI REM.
13
20
66
5
13
634
262
14
5
(,!>
100
3
5
5
5
3
5
5
19
4
1
5
4
6
5
5
1
0
5
5
4
4
50
50
1
1
i
21
94
09
BU
L SO
L 50
L 50
112
6B





L
L

L
L
L
L

I


L
I

L




L
L
L
L


1900
3255
7biO
Ibb56
M2
11057
9U5
2962
6
2250
2
42
7
5
5
2
5
5
5
5
4
5
51
243
5
5
61
5
25
72
79
23
50
50
50
50
230
7

     OJ
rn
(/>
C

-------
                                                SUMMARY Uf ANALYTICAL UUA
FRACTION   CAKAMEItK

UASt-NlUI. ACtNAPHTHtNE
           1.2,4-TRlCMLOROBENJ£N£
           HEXACHLORUUEN2ENE
           1.2-OICHLORUBEN/ENL
           1 ,3-GICHLORUtiENUlJt
           1,4-OICHLOftOBENZENE
           3,3<-OICHLOROBEN2IDlNE
           FLUQRANIHENE;
           B1S<2-CHLOKOEIHYOXYI  ME I HAKE
           HEXACHLOKOBUIA01ENE
           NAPHTHALENE
           0IS(2-EIHYLHEXYL)  PHTHALATE
           BUTYL BEN2YL PHTHALATE
           OI-M-Btmi PHTHALATE
           OI-H-GCm PHIHALAU'
           OUIHYL PIIIHALATE
           DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
           1.2-BtNJANTHKACENE
           BENid (AIPYKENE
           3.4-BENZOfLUORANTHLNE
           ClIKYSENE
           ACENAPHIHYLENE
           ANTHRACENE
           1.12-BEN20PERYLENE
           FLUORENE
           PHENANTHRENE
           1 ,215,6-UlBENlANTHMACEllE
           II.OENOI l,2,3-C,Ot  PYKEHE
           PYRENE

MLlALi     kNTIHONY
           ARSENIC
           BLRYLLIUH
           CAUnlUH
           CHHIIMIUM
           COI'Ptk
           CYANIDE
           LEAD
           HERCURY
           NICKEL
           SELENIUM

POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED MEKE  NEVER  UEICCUD
L-IESS TIIANi    N-0  NQI DETECTED!
PKELIHINANY OAIA UNLY	10  BE  VtUtUU
            PLANT   1

                   SLCUt.OAt-Y PCNI   HK1MAKY   CUMblNLO    SECONUA^Y
UNITS   IhfLUEN!   EffLUEM  REM.   SLUUCE    SLUDGE      SLJDCL       FLQIAbLES
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UL/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/l
0
0
c
3
1
3
I 25
1
0
0
4
2V
2
t,
0
3
2
1
0
I 4
1
0
4
0
1
4
0
0
s
I 50
I 50
L 2
\i
450
191
71
55
276
91
L 5u
L 10
L 10
I 10
1
I
1
1
2
L 25
1 10
7




50
40

40

67
50





50


50


40



o7
90
86
90
64

59


L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L



L
L
L
L

L


L

L


I
L












117
10
10
10
10
10
25
10
25
10
195
2231
1
10
10
10
10
479
10
t75
479
10
1572
25
313
1572
50
50
754
146
1263
37
I.J20
14571
77429
627
4*657
1000
13343
5

L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
I


L
L
L
L
L

I


I

I


I
I












75
10
10
10
10
10
25
10
25
10
23
1240
10
10
10
10
10
250
10
299
250
10
642
25
133
342
50
50
349
66
176
12
599
17bo6
24243
NQI RUN
11029
m
31H6
5
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L


L
L
L
L
L
L
L

L
L

I
I



I











10
10
10
10
10
10
25
to
2!»
10
\
42
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0
lu
10
4
25
10
4
10
fc
10
25
67
10
322
19917
£917
59
179B
333
3700
<2

I
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L




L
I
L

t


I

I


L
L







L




1U9
10
10
10
10
10
25
10
25
10
421
511
100
5
10
10
10
1B6
10
137
100
10
lllb
25
2
lllb
5u
50
192
4
23
1
32
443b
16C6
50
112
2Ct
411
3

-------
                                               SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL UA1A

                                                        PLAN!   I
FRACTION

METALS
           PARAMETER
           SILVER
           THALLIUM
           ZINC
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L L
UG/L
INFLUENT
e
50

L
L
SECONDARY
CFFLULM
2
SO
90
HCNT
REM.
75
(,6
PK1MAHY
SLUUGE
25
129714
CJMBIHtD
SLUDtb
02
1
47857
SECUNDAKY
SLUUGL
207
14717
FLU1A8LES
2
N-C METALS ALUMINUM
           BARIUM
           CALCIUM
           IRON
           MAGNESIUM
           MANGANESE
UG/L
UG/L
M&/L
UG/L
H&/L
UG/L
mt
129
63
2990
27
104
203
50
79
392
27
111
61
5
87
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
SOT HUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NUT KUM
NOT RUN
NUT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUI.
NUT RUN
NUT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NUT RUN
HOI rtUN
NUI RUN
NUT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT KUN
NUT RUN
NHl RUII
NUT kUN
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED HERE NEVER DETECTED
L-LESS THANI    N-0  NOT DETECTED;
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY- —TU BE VERIFIED

-------
                                                        MASS BALANCE  IN LBS. PEK  t'AY
                                                                UEEK  1 DATA ONLY

                                                                     PLANT 1
            FRACTION
            CONVENTIONAL 8
            NON-CONVENT10NAL8
            VOLATILES
K
H
A
PARAMETER

BOD
TOTAL SUSP. SOLIbti
COD
OIL I GREASE

TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS
TOTAL VOLATILE  SOLIDS
TOTAL VOL. SUS.  SOLIDS
AHHONIA NITROGEN
TOC

ACRYLON1TRILE
BENZENE
CARDON TETRACHLORIPE
CHLORObENZENE
1.2-DICHLOROETHANE
1.1.1-TRICHLOROETHANE
I*I-DICHLORO£THANE
1f1>2-TRICHLOROETHANE
CHLOROFORM
It1-DICHLOROETHCLENE
li2-TftANS-bICHLOKOETHYLENE
1 > 2-DICIILOROPROPANE
ETHYLBENZENE
HETHVLENE CHLORIDE
HETHYL CHLORIDE
DICHLOROUROHOMETHANE
TRICMOROFLUOROHE THANE
CHLORQDIDROMOHETHANE
U'TRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE

2.4.6-TRICHLOROPIIENOL
PARACHLOROHETA  CRESOL
2-CHLOROPHENOL
2>4-DIHETHYLFH£NOL
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENOL

ACENAPIITHENE
I .2.4 TRICHI (IKtlbLN/ENE
HEXACHLORQbENZENE
1,2 DICHI ORObEN/ENE
1.3 OICHl
-------
             FRACTION
             BASE-NEUTRALS
03
 A
            NETALS
            NON-CONV. METALS
                                                          MASS  BALANCE  IN LB9. PER PAY

                                                                WEEK 1  DATA ONLY

                                                                     PLANT  1
PARAMETER

BIS<2-CHLOROETMYOXY> METHANE
IIEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
NAPHTHALENE
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTVL PHTHALATE
DIETHVL PHTHALATE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
1r2-BENZANTHRACENE
3 > 4-BENZOFLUORANTHENE
CHRYSENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
ANTHRACENE
1r12-BENZOPERYLENE
FLUORENE
PHENANTHRENE
1.2I5>6-DIBENZANTHRACENE
INDENOU»2.3-CrD> PYRENE
PYRENE

ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
THALLIUM
ZINC

ALUMINUM
BARIUM
CALC1UH
IRON
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
INFLUENT
.4
.2
3.2
23.7
1.7
4.3
.2
2.4
1.4
.4
N-D
.4
.2
2.7
.2
1.1
2.7
.2
,2
1.3
N-D
N-D
N-D
8.9
337
148
12.3
• 36,7
.2
74.1
N-D
3.8
N-D
192
1030
96.3
62329
2437
20039
76.2
TOTAL OUT
N-D
N-D
2.1
16.7
1.6
2.2
.3
1.1
.5
i.e
L 0.1
1.0
N-D
5.9
N-D
1.3
3.9
.6
.6
4.2
.7
4.2
.2
10.6
293
337
7.4
144.4
.3
107.2
.3
2.3
L 0.1
572
_
-
-
-
-
-
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
N-D
N-D
1.6
10.3
1.6
2.2
.3
1.1
.5
.5
N-D
.3
N-D
1.6
N-D
.5
1.6
.5
.3
2.2
N-D
N-D
N-D
3.1
33.1
20.7
3.0
N-D
.3
30.7
N-D
N-D
N-D
68.6
154
37.7
60375
298
20197
84.0
PRIMARY
6LUDOE
N-D
N-D
.5
3.9
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
N^D
N-D
1.3
1.8
1.3
N-D
4.2
N-D
.8
4.2
N-D
N-D
2.0
.4
3.4
L 0.1
3.3
38. B
206
1.7
123
L 0.
35.
L 0.
L 0.
L 0.
346
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
SECONDARY
SLUDOE
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
.3
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
.1
L 0.1
N-D
.3
.0
.1
4.2
221
110
.7
19.3
L 0.1
40.9
.3
2.2
L 0.1
157
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
            POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED HERE NEVER DETECTED
            L-LE8S THAN*   N-D  NOT DETCCTEDI
            PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY	TO BE VERIFIED

-------
                                              PERCENT OCCURRENCE  OF  POLLUTANT PARAMETERS

                                                                PLANT  1
3
  PARAMETER

 bENZENE
 1 .1 . 1-TR1CHLOROETHANE
 OIL OROFORM
 ML'THYLENE CHLORIDE
 lEIRACHLOROETHYLENE
 10LUENE
 IKICHLOROETHYLENE
 CHROMIUM
 COPPER
 CYANIDE
 ZINC
 ElHYLbENZENE
 NICKEL
 1.2-TRANS-DICHLOROETHYLENE
 PHENOL
 BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYLk PHTHALATE
 CADMIUM
 I.1 DICHLOROETHYLENE
 NAPHTHALENE
 SILVER
 ANTHRACENE
 PHENANTHRENE
 MERCURY
 IEAD
 IlI-N-bUTYL PHTHALATE
 DIETHYL PHTHALAIE
 1,2 UICIIl ORObENZENE
 1.4-bICHLORObENZENE
 l.l-DICHLOROETHANE
 bllTVL bENZVL  PHTHALATE
 DIMETHYL  PHTHALATE
 PYRENE
 CHLORObENZENE
 PENTACHLOROFHENOL
 tLUORANIHENE
 It  UOKENE
 1.3 DICHLORObENZENE
 CARliON TETRACHLORIDE
 1.2 -bENZANIHRACENE
 CHRYSENE
 I,I.2-TRICHLOKOETHANE
 METHYL CHLORIDE
 TRICHI OROFLIIOROMETHANE
 ACtNAIHTHENE
 blS(2 CHIOROEIHYOXY) METHANE
 1.215.4 IlIbENZANTHRACL'NE
 INDLIUH 1 .2.3-C.D) PYRENE
 1 ,2 111 Till OROt THANE
 I .2 MLIII OKOPROPANE
 UMJfHIl OI.H
 li!  I.Ill OHObROHOMETHANE
I CHI U.I AMIS NOT LISTED UERE NOT
UNCONFIRMED PESTICIDES UERE ASSUMED  NOT
NUHbLKS IN PARENTHESES ARE THE NUHbER  OF
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY 10 HE VERIFIED
INFL- PRECL SEC.
UENT EFFL EFFL
100 (28) 33 ( 3) 84
100 (28) 100 ( 3) 100
100 (28) 100 ( 3) 100
100 (28) 100 ( 3) 100
100 (28) 100 ( 3) 100
100 (28) 100 ( 3) 100
100 (28) 100 ( 3) 100
100 (23) 100 ( 3) 100
100 (23) 100 ( 3) 100
100 (26) 0 ( ) 100
100 (23) 100 ( 3) 100
94 (28) 0 ( 3) 100
94 (23) 100 ( 3k 100
93 (28) 0(3) 43
93 (28) 100 < 3) 100
93 (28) 100 ( 3) 100
91 (23) 47 < 3k 71
69 (28) 100 ( 3) 100
82 (28) 0(3) 43
78 (23) 0(3) 0
73 (28) 0(3) 43
73 (28) 0(3) 43
74 (23) 33 ( 3) 100
70 (23) 0(3) 0
48 (28) 33 < 3k 37
41 (28) 0(3) 29
54 (28) 0 ( 3k 14
SO (28) 0 < 3k 29
43 (26) 0(3) 0
39 (28) 0 < 3k 43
39 (28) 0(3) 14
34 (28) 0(3) 57
29 (28) 0(3) 0
29 (26) 47 ( 3) 14
29 (28) 0(3) 43
29 (26) 0(3) 14
21 (26) 0(3) 14
18 (26) 0(3) 0
16 (28) 0 (3) 14
16 (28) 0(3) 14
11 (26) 0(3) 0
7 (26) 0(3) 0
7 (26) 0 ( 3k 14
7 (28) 0(3) 0
7 (28) 0(3) 0
7 (26) 0(3) 14
7 (26) 0(3) 14
4 < 26) 0(3) 0
4 (26) 0(3) 0
4 (26) 0(3) 0
4 (26) 0(3) 57
DETECTED AT ANY SAMPLE POINT
PRIM.
SLDG
7k 100
7) 57
7) 0
7) 100
7) 100
7k 100
7) 100
7) 100
7k 100
7k 100
7k 100
7) 100
7) 100
7) 43
7k 29
7k 84
7k 100
7k 29
7) 71
7k 100
7k 84
7k 64
7k 29
7k 100
7k 0
7) 0
7k 0
7k 0
7k 57
7k 14
7k 0
7k 71
7k 0
7) 14
7) 0
7) 43
7) 0
7k 29
7k 64
7) 84
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 57
7) 0
7k 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 100

COMb
SLDG
7) 0
7) 0
7k 0
7) 0
7) 0
7k 0
7) 0
7) 100
7) 100
7k 0
7k 100
7k 0
7k 100
7k 0
7k 17
7k 83
7k 100
7) 0
7k 30
7k 100
7k 83
7k 83
7k 29
7k 100
7k 0
7k 0
7k 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7k 0
7) 47
7k 0
7) 17
7k 0
7k 33
7k 0
7k 0
7k 47
7k 47
7k 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) SO
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0

6EC.
SLDO
SO
0
0
100
83
33
17
7) 100
7k 100
) SO
71 100
k 33
7k 100
) 0
4k 20
4k 40
7k 100
k 0
4k 20
7k 100
4k 40
4k 40
7k 17
71 100
4k 0
4k 0
4k 0
4k 0
k 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
> 0
4k 20
4k 0
4) 0
4) 0
) 33
4) 0
4) 0
) 0
k 0
k 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 20
4) 20
) 0
) 0
) 0
( ) 83

FLOT-
A6LE6
4) 84
4) 14
4) 0
4) 100
4) 71
4) 64
4) 71
4) 100
4) 100
4) 0
4) 100
4k 84
4k 100
4k 29
3k 29
3k 84
4) 100
4k 0
! Sk 37
I 4) 84
I Sk 100
I 3k 100
( 4) 14
(4) 84
( S) 14
( 3) 0
( 3k 0
( 3) 0
( 4) 0
( S) 43
( 3k 0
(3) 100
( 4) 0
( S) 29
( 3) 0
( Sk 14
( Sk 0
(4) 29
S) 84
5) 84
4k 0
4) 0
4) 0
5) 43
Sk 0
5k 0
S) 0
4) 0
4) 0
( 4) 0
(4) 84

TAP
WATER
7) 100 ( 1)
7k 0 ( Ik
7k 100 ( Ik
7k 100 ( Ik
7k 100 (Ik
7) 100 ( 1)
7k 0(1)
7) 0(1)
7) 0(1)
7k 0 ( Ik
7k 0 ( Ik
7k 0(1)
7) tOO ( Ik
7k 0 ( Ik
7k 100 < Ik
7k 100 ( 1)
7k 100 ( Ik
7k 100 < 1)
7) 0 < Ik
7k 100 ( I)
7k 0 < Ik
7k 0 < Ik
7k 100 ( 1)
7k 100 ( 1)
7k 100 ( Ik
7k 0(1)
7k 0 < 1)
7k 041k
7k 0 < Ik
7k 0 ( Ik
7k 0 4 Ik
7k 0 ( Ik
7k 0(1)
7) 0 ( Ik
7k 0<1>
7k 0 ( 1 k
7k 0 ( Ik
7k 100 ( 1)
7k 0(1)
7k 0 (Ik
7k 0 4 Ik
7k 0 1)
7) 0 1)
7) 0 1)
7k 0 1)
7) 0 1 >
7) 0 1 )
7) 0 1 >
7) 0 1 >
7) 0 1)
7) 100 1)

                                                 DETECTED
                                                  SAMPLES TAKEN

-------
32
                                              PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF POLLUTANT PARAMETERS

                                                               PLANT  1
            PARAMETER

          CHLORODIBROHOMETHANE
          2 r 4. A-TRICMLOROPHENOL
          PARACHLOROMETA  CRESOL
          lr2>4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
          HEXACHLOROBENZENE
          HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
          DI-N-OCTVL PHTHALATE
          BENZO (A)PVRENE
          ACENAPHTMYLENE
          1>12-BENZOPERYLENE
          ACRYLONITRILE
          2-CHLOROPHENOL
          2.4-D1HETHYLPMENOL
          3r3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
          3.4-BENZOFLUORANTHENE
          ANTIMONY
          ARSENIC
          BERYLLIUM
          SELENIUM
          THALLIUM
INFL- PRECL
UENT EFFL
4 (28) 0
4 (28) 0
4 (28) 0
4 (28) 0
4 (2BI 0
4 <2B> 0
4 <2S) 0
4 (28) 0
4 (2BI 0
4 (28) 0
0 (281 0
0 (28) 0
0 (29) 33
0 (28) 0
0 (28) 0
0 (23) 0
0 (23) 0
6 (23) 0
0 (23) 0
0 (23) &
SEC.
EFFL
3) 0
3) 0
3) 0
3) 0
3) 0
3) 0
3> 14
3) 0
3) 0
3) 0
3) 0
3) 14
3) 14
3) 14
3) 0
3) 0
3) 0
3) 0
3) 0
3) 0
PRIM.
EL DO
7) 43 <
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7> 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 71
7) 100
7) 100
7) 100
7) 43
7) 100
COMB
BLDO
7) 0
71 0
7> 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7> 0
7) 0
7> 30
7) 100
7) 100
7) 100
7) 29
7) 43
SEC.
SLPO
> 67
A) 0
6) 0
A) 0
6) 0
6) 0
4) 0
*) 0
6) 0
A) 0
) 17
A) 0
4) 0
A) 0
«) 20
7) 100
7) 100
7) 100
7) 83
7) 83
FLOT-
ABLES
A) 71 (
5) 0 <
3) 0 <
3) 0 (
3) 0 <
3) 0 (
5) 0
3) 0
5) 0
5) 0
A) 14
5) 0
3) 0
S) 0
5) BA
A) 2?
A) 43
A) 100
6) 2?
A) 8A
TAP
UATER
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) O
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7> O
7> 0
7) 0
7> 0
7) 100
7> 0
7> 0
7) 0
7) 0








1)
1)
1)
I)
1)
1)
1)
1>
1>
1)
1>
1)
1>
1)
          POLLUTANTS  NOT  LISTED MERE  NOT  DETECTED AT  ANY SAMPLE POINT
          UNCONFIRMED PESTICIDES WERE ASSUMED NOT DETECTED
          NUMBERS IN  PARENTHESES ARE  THE  NUMBER OF SAMPLES TAKEN
          PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY-TO BE VERIFIED

-------
                                                           SUHHAM  OF  ANALYTICAL  C.A1A

                                                                    PL AN I    2
              FRACIIUN
              CONVENT IUNALi
              NON-CONVENTIONAL*
              VOLAIILES
H>
/A
CNT
REH.
05
91
79
67
US
a
8
69

bJ

70


100




100
•jb



4C
SO
l^J




JS





l'n£ CL
LF'LUENT
20
12
i2
MJT t-UN
KOI f ON
496
1<9
7
70
29
I 100
1
0
1
t
L •.
4
1
L 1
0
4
1
0
1
3
i
0
e>
33
i
4
1
1
L 10
L ;s
L 25
L 10













L
L
L
L
L
L
L



L



I
L
I
I

I
t
I
I
I
I
CUMUlNED
SLUOGE
U4S7
21714
3242)
J^Sl
464
2!>571
I42b6
12100
12707
ll'il'l
41
33
t»
i
5
5
5
5
5
2
247
74
5
9
bl
3 Jo
b
iO
5C
to
4
IG
10
10
2S
25
1G

-------
                                                    SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL DATA

                                                             PLANT   2
         FRACTION

         BASE-NEUTRALS
o>
en
        METALS
        NON-CONV. METALS
.PARAMETER

 ISOPHORONE
 NAPHTHALENE
 BISI2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHIIULAlt
 BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
 DtrN-BUTYL PHTMALAU
 DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
 OIETHYL PHTHALAIE
 D1HETHYL PHTHALATE
 1,2-BENZANTHRACENE
 BEMZO (A)PYRENE
 3i4-BENZOFLUOKANIHENt
 11,12-BENZOFLUORANIMENE
 CHRYSENE
 ACENAPHTHYLENE
 ANTHRACENE
 PHENANTHRENE
 PYRENE

 ANTIHONV
 ARSENIC
 BERYLLIUM
 CADMIUM
 CHROHIUH
 COPPER
 CYANIDE
 LEAD
 MERCURY
 NICKEL
 SELENIUM
 SILVER
 THALLIUM
 ZINC

 ALUMINUM
 BARIUM
 CALCIUM
 IRON
 HAGNESIUH
 MANGANESE
UNITS
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/t
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
NG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/l
UG/L
UC/L
MG/L
UG/L
MG/L
UG/L
INfLUEN
I
4
10
5

-------
                                            PERCENT  OCCURRENCE OF POLLUTANT PARAMETER!2

                                                              PLANT  2
Co
A
  PARAMETER

 tENZENE
 CHLOROFORM
 ETHYLbENZENE
 METHYLENE CULORlbE
 TETRACIILOROETHYLEHE
 TOLUENE
 BI8(2-ETHYLHEXYL> PHTHALATE
 BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
 CllhQHIUM
 COPPER
 CYANIDE
 NICKEL
 ZINC
 1 .1•I-IRICHLOROETHANE
 TRICHLOROETHYLEME
 bI-N-t>UTYL PHTHALATE
 DIETHYL PHTHALATE
 CAOHIUH
 PHENOL
 1,2-DICIILORObENZENE
 NAPHTHALENE
 MERCURY
 1.1-bICHLOftOETHYLENE
 D1CHLOROBROHOHETHANE
 bl-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
 1,2-UICHLOROETHANE
 FLUORANIHENE
 DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
 PYRENE
 CHLORObENZENE
 1.1-blCHLOROETHANE
 CHLORObliiROHOMETHANE
 ANTHRACENE
 PHENANTHRENE
 LEAD
 SILVER
 1,2-bICHLOKOPROPANE
 PENTACHLOROPHENOL
 1.J-blCHLORObENZENE
 1,4-bICIILORObENZENE
 2,6-bINITROTOLUENE
 ISOPHORONE
 bENZO  (A)PYRENE
 3,4-bENZOFLUORANIHENE
 I 1.12-bENZOFlUOKANTHENE
 ACHYl ONITKIL*
 1 . 3 -IiICHLOROf'RUPYLENE
 liKOHOf UkM
 IK ILHLORUI-LUUKQME THANE
 111 CHI UhUblFLUOKUHE fHANE
 1' Nl TKOHIENOL
rOlLUTANIS NOT  LISTEb  MERE NOT bETECIEb
UNCONFlRMEb PESTICIbES UERE ASSUMED NOT
NUMbtKS IN PARENTHESES ARE THE NUHbER OF
F-KELIHINARY bATA  ONLY-TO  *E VERIFIED
INFL-
UENT
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
86
86
64
86
86
71
71
71
71
57
57
57
43
43
43
43
29
29
29
29
29
29
29
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
0
0
o
0
0
0
PftE CL
EFFL.
7> 43
7) 86
7> 29
7) 100
7) 86
7) 100
7> 86
7) 43
7) 100
7) 100
7) 0
7) 100
7) 100
7) 14
7) 43
7> 57
7) 29
7) 0
71 100
71 14
7) 14
7) 17
7) 43
7) 57
7) 29
7> 2V
7) 0
7) 29
7) 0
7) 14
7) 0
7) 43
7) O
7) 0
7) 17
7) 17
7) 0
7) 43
7> 29
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 14
7) 0
7) 71
SEC.
EFFL
7) 57
7) 100
7) 29
7> 86
7) 100
7) 100
7) 86
7) 57
6) 100
4) 100
) 100
6) 100
6) 100
7) 14
7) 14
7) 57
7) 29
6) 0
7) 86
7> 29
7) 29
4) 29
7) 57
7) 84
7) 14
7) 29
7) 0
7> 29
7) 0
7) 0
7> 0
7) 57
7> 0
7) 0
6) 14
6> 14
7) 0
7* 14
7> 57
7» 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7> 0
7> 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7> 0
7) 43
COM*.
SLliO
7) 86
7) 0
7) 29
7) 100
7) 86
7) 86
7) 100
7) 14
7) 100
7) 100
7) 100
7) 100
7> 86
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 100
7) 14
7) 0
7> 43
7) 29
7) 0
7) 100
7) 0
71 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 71
7) 0
7> 0
7> 29
7) 71
7) 71
7) 100
7) 86
71 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 71
7) 0
7> 14
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
7) 0
( 7> 0
SEC. bAF.
SLDO 8LDO
7) 100 1) 100
7) 01) 0
7> 100 1) 100
7) 100 11 100
7> 0 1) 100
7) 100 1) 100
7) 0 > 0
7) 0 ) 0
7) 0 > 0
7) 0 ) 0
7) 100 1) 100
7) 0 ( > 0
7) 0 < ) 0
7) 0(1) 0
7) 0<1) 0
7) 0 < > 0
7k 0 ( > 0
7) 0 ( > 0
7) 0 < > 0
7) 0 ( > 0
7) 0 < ) 0
7) 0 ( ) 0
7) 0 < 1) 0
7) 100 ( 1) 100
7) 0 < ) 0
7> 0 < 1) 0
7) 0 < > 0
7) 0 < > 0
7) 0 ( > 0
7) 0 < I) 0
7) 0(1) 0
7) 0<1> 0
7) 0 ( > 0
7) 0 ( > 0
7) 0 ( ) 0
7) 0 ( > 0
7) 0(1) 0
7) 0 ( > 0
7) 0 ( > 0
7) 0 ( ) 0
7) 0 ( > 0
7) 0 ( ) 0
7) 0 ( > 0
7) 0 ( > 0
7) 0 ( ) 0
7) 0(1) 0
7) 0(1) 100
7) 0(1) 100
7) 0(1) 0
7) 0(1) 100
(7) 0 ( ) 0


1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
>
>
>
>
1)
)
>
1)
1)
>
)
)
k
>
1
I
I)
1)
)
1)
)
)
)
1)
1)
1)




1








1
1
1
1
1

TAP
WATER
0
100
0
100
0
100
100
100
0
100
0
0
100
0
0
100
too
0
100
too
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
1 0
1 0


1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
I)
I)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
I)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1 )
1 )
1 >
( 1)
                                                     AT ANY SAMPLE POINT
                                                     DETECTEb
                                                      SAMPLES TAKEN

-------
                                PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF POLLUTANT PARAMETERS
  PARAMETER

 4-NITROFHENOL
 3r3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
 1 . 2-BENZAMTHRACENE
 CIIRYSENE
 ACENAPHTHYLENE
 ANTIMONY
 ARSENIC
 BERYLLIUM
 SELENIUM
 THALLIUM


INFL-
UENT
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
0
0




7)
7)
7>
7)
7)
7)
7)
7)
7)
7)
PLANT
\
PRE CL
EFFL,
43 (
0 (
14 (
14 (
14 <
0 <
0 (
0 (
0 <
0 <
2



7)
7)
7)
7)
7>
A)
«)
A)
6)
6)


SEC.
EFFL
29
14
14
14
29
0
0
0
0
0




7)
7)
7>
7)
7)
7>
7>
7)
7)
7)


COMB.
SI HO
0
0
29
29
0
too
100
94
86
43




7)
7>
7)
7)
7)
7)
7)
7)
7)
7)


SEC.
SLOO
0 < I
0 (
0 <
0 <
0 <
0
0
0
0
0


DAF.
SLEIO
0 (
0 (
0 <
0 <
0 <
0 (
0 (
0 1
0 <
0 (


TAP
MATER
) 0
) 0
) 0
> 0
> 0
> 0
) 0
) 0
> 0
> 0




I)
1)
1 )
1 )
1)
1)
1>
1)
1)
1)
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED AT ANY  SAMPLE  POINT
UNCONFIRMED PESTICIDES WERE ASSUMED NOT DETECTED
NUMBERS IN PARENTHESES ARE THE NUMBER OF SAMPLES  TAKEN
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY-TO BE VERIFIED

-------
                                         MftSB BALANCE IM LBS. Ff«

                                                  PLANT  2
 FRACTION
 CONVENT IONALB
 NON-CONVENTIONAL8
 VOLATILE8
PARAMETER

BOD
TOTAL SUSP. SOLIDS
COD
OIL I GREASE

TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS
TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDS
TOTAL VOL. SUB. SOLIDS
AHHONIA NITROGEN
TOC

ACRYLONITRILE
BENZENE
CHLOROBENZENE
1f2-DICHLOROETHANE
1 . 1 f 1 -TRICIILOROETHANE
Irl-DICHLOROETHANE
CHLOROFORM
1.1 -DICIILOROETHYLENE
1t2-DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYLBENZENE
HETHYLENE CHLORIDE
DICHLOROBROHOME THANE
CHLORODIBROMOMETIIANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE

2-NITROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENOL

1.2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1.3-DICHLOKOBENZENE
1>4-DICULOROBENZENE
3>3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
2.4-DINITROTOLUENE
FLUORANTHENE
IBOPHORONE
NAPHTHALENE
BI8(2-ETHYLHEXYL>  PHTHALATE
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-BUTYL PM1HALATE
DI-N-OCTYL HIIHAI A1E
DIETMYL PHHIAIATE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
1.2-BENZANTHKACENE
      
-------
                                       MASS  BALANCE  IN  LBB.  PER DAY

                                                  PLANT 2
 FRACTION

 BABE-NEUTRALS
 METALS
 NON-CONV. METALS
PARAMETER

3>4-BENZOFLUORANTHENE
11t12-BENZOFLUORANTHENE
CHRYSENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
ANTHRACENE
PHENANTHRENE
PYRENE

ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUM
CADHIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
THALLIUM
ZINC

ALUMINUM
BARIUM
CALCIUM
IRON
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
MOLYBDENUM
SODIUM
TIN
TITANIUM
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
INFLUENT
L 0.1
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
L 0.1
.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
.3
4.8
3.6
5.2
1.1
L 0.1
2.0
N-D
L 0.1
N-D
IB. 7
36.2
3.0
3928
111
828
18.9
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
SECONDARY
TOTAL OUT EFFLUENT
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L




L

L
L
L













0.1 N-D
N-D N-D
O.
0,
0.
0.
O.
0.
0.
O.
0.
3.
3.
1O.
2.
Ot
2.
0.
0.
0.
10.
L 0.1
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
J.3
.7
9.4
.2
L 0.1
1.3
N-D
L 0.1
N-D
3.5
3.4
1.7
4400
12.7
818
11.8
.4
404
.4
.4
.4
.4
COMBINED
SLUDGE
L 0.1
N-D
L 0.1
N-D
L 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
2.1
2.8
.5
1.9
L 0.1
.8
L 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
6.9
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED WERE NEVER DETECTED
L-LESS THAN!  N-D  NOT DETECTED!
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY	TO BE VERIFIED

-------
                                                              OF ANALYTICAL  DATA

                                                               PLANT    j
 I KAC I I UN
 CONVENTIONAL*
 NON-CONVENTIONALS
 VOLATILE^
ACIO LXIKACI


UASt-NLUIKALS
                    PAKAHCTCK

                    UQD
                    TOTAL SUSP.  SuLILS
                    COO
                    UIL C GKEAit

                    TOTAL PHENOLS
                    TOTAL SOLIDS
                    TOTAL OISS.  SJLlOS
                    SEIREAbLC  SULIOS
                    TOTAL VOLAIILt  SuLIUS
                    VOLATILE DISS.  SOLIbS
                    TOTAL VOL.  SUS.  SOLIDS
                    AMMONIA NITROGEN
                    TOC

                    ittNZENt
                    1 ,1.1-IKlCHLUkUt IHAUt
                    1. I-OICIILOHQEIIUNI
                    CHIUROFUKM
                    1 , l-DICHLOKGLIH«LlNE
                    1 ,2-OlCHLOfiOPKLif'Al.t
                    EIIULbENKN'E
                    HtTMYLENE CllliJHIt/L
                    MEIMVL CHLOK1UE
                    OICHLOKOBKOHOHE THAKL
                    IK ICMLURi)FLUl
1615
38020
b076
NUT KUN
205t> 7
2619
17662
31
15194
2
N-0
N-0
N-0
N-C
N-0
96
1
N-0
N-0
N-0
N-0
IfcOl
54
N-0
N-D
30
4310
N-0
N-0
N-U
N-0
23

-------
                                                              SUMMARY  OF  ANALYTICAL DATA

                                                                       PLANT    3
            FRACTION

            BASE-NEUTRALS
to
            METALS
 PARAMETER

 NAPHTHALENE
 BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL> f'HTIULATE
 BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATt
 OI-N-BUTYL PHTHALAIE
 DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
 D1ETHYL PHTHALATE
 DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
 1>2-BENZANTHRACENE
 BEN20 (AIPYRCNE
 3,4-OENiUFLUGHANTHENE
 11,12-BENZOFLUORANTMbNE
 CHRYSENE
, ANTHRACENE
 FLUORENE
 PHENANTHRENE
 PYKENE

 ANTIMONY
 ARSENIC
 BtRYLLlUH
 CADMIUM
 CHROMIUM
 COPPER
 CYANlDt
 LEAD
 MERCURY
 NICKEL
 SELENIUM
 SILVER
 ZINC

 ALUMINUM
 BARIUM
 BORON
 CALCIUM
 COBALT
 IRON
 MAGNESIUM
 MANGANESE
 MOLYBDENUM
           POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED MERE NEVER DETECTED
           L-LESS THAN I     N-D  NOT DETECTED! .
           PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY- TO BE VERIFIED
            NON-CONV. HETALS
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
tiG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
iJG/L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
UG/l
UG/L
NG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UC/L
HG/L
UG/L
UG/L
MG/L
UG/L
UG/L
INFLUINI
3
29
6
7
4
5
2
0
0
0
0
a
2
I 10
2
0
L 4
3
t 1
4
2V
295
96
97
L 1000
59
I 4
2
317
23U4
116
20V
24
26
12026
*
303
147
L

L

L

L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L






L

L
L










SECUNDARY PCNT
EFFLUENT REM.
10
5
10
5
10
1
10
10
10
3
5
to
10
10
10
io
4
5
0
6
10
43
138
44
1030
89
4
4
61
2S1
1
256
19
11
233
3
23
151

=\1

29

BO














06
as

55




81
09
V9
11
21
58
98
25
92

t

L

t

L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
I
I

I





L

L
L


t







PRE CL
EFFLUENT
10
9
10
3
10
1
10
10
10
5
5
10
10
10
IG
10
4
2
5
1
7
39
S3
30
1000
42
4
4
70
79
1
252
27
6
116
3
17
152
PHIHARY
SLODCt
78
3CJ
57
263
N-D
(4-0
N-D
15
H-u
N-0
N-D
15
260
10
260
66
130
403
13
i'3i
5000
25667
20530
6833
47333
647
2U
417
27667
NUT KUN
NOT RUN
NOT HUH
NOT RUN
NUT RUN
NOT HUH
NUT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT kUN
COMblNID
SLUDGE
N-D
157
N-D
37
N-D
N'D
N-D
N-0
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
104
N-0
104
32
52
US
10
42
4750
20500
7223
1475
29250
478
12
368
16000
NUT RUN
NOT IS UN
NOT KUN
NUT RUN
NOT RUN
NUT kUN
NUT kUN
NOT kUN
NUT KUN

-------
                                                                                       Yl I C;1L 0,'U
                                                                                                                             IL
                                                                                                               H£H.
                                                                         UO/i
                                                                                    so
                                                                                    15'.
                                                                                    71
66
J
3
?U
PK1MAKV
SLUDCL

HOI  KUN
NUT  KUIJ
t.UI  BUN
NOT  KUN
NllI  RON
COHblNi.ll
SLUDCfc

NOi  KUN
NO)  KUU
NO!  RUN
NO I  KUN
/I
             I'llIlUIANIS Mill  LISUD kltKL  NtVtK  JL
             1-ltSS  1HANI     N-U  NQI  DtlECTLUi

             fHU KIIIMM Urtlrt UNLr-  TO B£

-------
                                                            HASS BALANCE IN LBS.  PER  DAY
                                                                      PLAN1 3
           FRACTION
           CONVENTIONALS
           NON-CONVENTIONAL9
           VOLATILE9
A
                    PARAMETER

                    BOD
                    TOTAL  SUSP.  SOLIDS
                    COD
                    OIL  S  GREASE

                    TOTAL  PHENOLS
                    TOTAL  SOLIDS
                    TOTAL  DISS.  SOLIDS
                    TOTAL  VOLATILE SOLIDS
                    VOLATILE DISS. SOLIDS
                    TOTAL  VOL. SUS.  SOLIDS
                    AMMONIA NITROOEN
                    TOC

                    BENZENE
                    111.1-TRICHLOROETIIANE
                    Irl-DICHLOROETHANE
                    2-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER
                    CHLOROFORM
                    Irl-DICHLOROETIIYLENE
                    1.2-DICHLOROFROPANE
                    ETHYLDENZENE
                    HETHYLENE CHLORIDE
                    METHYL CHLORIDE
                    DICMLOROBROMOMETHANE
                    TRICMLOROFLUOROME THANE
                    CHLORODIBROMOME THANE
                    TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
                    TOLUENE
                    TRICHLOROETHYLENE
                    VINYL CHLORIDE

                    PENTACHLOROFHENOL
                    PHENOL

                    t > 214-TRICHLOROBENZENE
                    1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
                    1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
                    1f4-DICHLOROBENZENE
                    FLUORANTHENE
                    NAPHTHALENE
                    BIS<2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
                    BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
                    DI-N-BUTYL FHTHALATE
                    DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
                    DIETHYL PHTHALATE
                    DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
                    1i2-BENZANTHRACENE
                    BENZO 
-------
                                                                 MASS BALANCE IN IBS.  HER  DAY

                                                                           PLANT 3
              I KALI ION
              HtTALB
CO
H"
/I
NON-CONV. HEtALS
PARAMETER

3.4-bENZOFLUOfcANlMENE
11i12-bENZOFLUOKANTHENE
CHRYSENE
ANTHRACENE
FLUURENE
rilENANCIIKENE
PYRENE

ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUM
CADHIUH
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
2INC

ALUMINUM
BAR 1UM
BORON
CALCIUM
COBALT
IRON
MAONESIUM
MANUANESE
MOLYBDENUM
bODIUM
TIN
TITANIUM
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
INFLUENT
L 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
.2
N-D
.2
L 0.1
N-D
.2
N-D
.4
2.3
23.1
8.3
e.s
3.3
N-D
L 0.1
28.0
210
10.2
25. 5
2154
2.3
1062
371
30.2
13.0
5077
3.6
14.1
6.3
.3
IU1AL OUT
N-D
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
N-D
L 0.
L 0.
L 0.
L 0.
L 0.
.3
3.0
13.2
6.3
4.6
e.o
I 0.1
.2
12.7
_
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
.3
.8
3.8
3.2
3.9
7.8
N-D
N-D
S.4
22.1
.1
22.7
1636
.9
IS. 3
243
2.0
13.3
5USO
.4
.3
2.3
.3
COMBINED
SLUDOE
N-D
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
N-D
L 0.
L 0.
L 0.
L 0.
L 0.
L 0.
2.2
9.4
3.3
.7
.2
L 0.1
.2
7.3
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
                                                                                                                                     PRIMARY
                                                                                                                                     SLUUUE
                                                                                                                          N-U
                                                                                                                          N-D
                                                                                                                          0.
                                                                                                                          0.
                                                                                                                          0.
                                                                                                                          0.
                                                                                                                          0.

                                                                                                                          0.
                                                                                                                          0.
                                                                                                                          0.
                                                                                                                          0.

                                                                                                                          4.
                                                                                                                          3.
                                                                                                                          1.

                                                                                                                          0.
                                                                                                                          O.
                                                                                                                          4.6
                                                                                                                       NOT RUN
                                                                                                                       NQ1 RUN
                                                                                                                       NOT RUN
                                                                                                                       NOT RUN
                                                                                                                       NOT RUN
                                                                                                                       NOT RUN
                                                                                                                       NOT RUN
                                                                                                                       N01 RUN
                                                                                                                       NOT RUN
                                                                                                                       NOT RUN
                                                                                                                       NOT RUN
                                                                                                                       NOT RUN
                                                                                                                       NOT RUN
                                                                                                                       NOT RUN
             IKIMAKY bl UlUJt UtIANUlY  IB NUT INUlll'LH IN  IIII Al
             HIlllJIANIb Nil) I Ibltli  UthE NtVLI. HtlkClELl
             I  I L tili IIIANI  NO   NO I Ht ILCIt li*
             MVtl IHINAkY flAIA ONLY	10 bE UtRIKJLD
                                                                inn  COLUMN (INCLUDED IN COMBINED

-------
                                   PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF POLLUTANT PARAMETERS

                                                    PLANT  3
!    CO

•    A
  PARAMETER

 1•1.1-IRICHLOROETHANE
 CHLOROFORM
 HETMYLENE CHLORIDE
 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
 TOLUENE
 BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL> PHTHALATE
 BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
 DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
 CHROMIUM
 COPPER
 CYANIDE
 LEAD
 ZINC
 BENZENE
 ETHYLBENZENE
 PHENOL
 CADMIUM
 NICKEL
 TRICHLOROETHYLENE
 DIETHYL PHTHALATE
 1.1-DICHLOROETHYLENE
 NAPHTHALENE
 DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
 DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
 ARSENIC
 ANTHRACENE
 PHENANTHRENE
 SILVER
 1.1-DICHLOROETHANE
 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE
 TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
 1.2-DICHLOROBENZENE
 1> 3-DICHLOROBENZENE
 1,4-D1CHLOROBENZENE
 FLUORANTHENE
 1,2-BENZANTHRACENE
 BENZO (A)PYRENE
 3.4-BENZOFLUORANTHENE
 11>12-BENZOFLUORANTHENE
 CHRYSENE
 PYRENE
 METHYL CHLORIDE
 DICHLOROBROHOHETHANE
 CHLORODIBROMOHETHANE
 VINYL CHLORIDE
 PENTACHLOROPHEHOL
 1,1,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
 FLUORENE
 ANTIMONY
 BERYLLIUM
 MERCURY
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED HERE NOT DETECTED
UNCONFIRMED PESTICIDES WERE ASSUMED NOT
NUMBERS IN PARENTHESES ARE THE NUMBER OF
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY-TO BE VERIFIED
INFL- PRE CL SEC. PRIM. COMB. TAP THICKENER
UENT EFFL. EFFL BLDO SLOG UATER OVERFLOW
100  47
100 (10) 100
100 (ID 100
100 (10) 47
too  too
71 (11) 0
71 (111 0
71 (11) 0
70 (lOt 47
70 (10) 67
62 (11) 73
82 (It) 23
73 (11) 0
33 (11> 0
43 (ID 0
43 (11) 0
40 (10) 33
34 (11) 0
34 (11) 0
30 (10) 0
(11) 6
(ID 0
(It) 0
(11) 0
(11) 0
(ID 0
(11) 0
(11) 0
(11) 0
(11) 0
(11) 0
(11) 0
(11) 9
0 (11) 0
0(11) 0
0 (11) 0
0 (11) 0
6 (ID o
0 (ID 0
0 (11) 0
0 (1O> 0
0 (10) 0
0 (10) 0
4) 30
4) 23
4) 100
4) 0
4) 100
3) 100
3) 100
4) 100
3) 100
3) tOO
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
3) 73
3) 100
4) 23
4) 23
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
3) 0
4) 0
4) 9
3) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 23
4) 25
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
3) 0
3) 25
3) 0
4) 33
4) 0
4) 33
4) 0
4) 33
4) 100
4) 33
4) 33
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) 47
4) 33
4> 67
4) 100
4) 100
4) 47
4) 0
4) 47
4> 47
4) 0
4) 0
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) 0
4) 33
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 33
4) 100
4) 33
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 33
4) 100
4) 33
4) 0
4) 0
4) 47
4) 0
4) 47
4) 33
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
3) 0
3) 0
3) 23
3) 100
3) 73
3) 73
3) 0
3) SO
3) 100
3) 100
3) 100
3) 100
3) 100
3) 25
3) 73
3) 100
3) 100
3) 100
3) 0
3) 0
3) 0
3) 0
3) 0
3) 0
3) 100
3) 100
3) 100
3) 100
3) 0
3) 0
3) 0
3) 0
3) 0
3) 0
3) 100
3) 0
3) 0
3) 0
3) 0
3) 0
3) 100
3) 0
3) 0
3) 0
3) 0
3) 23
3) 0
3) 0
3) 100
3) 100
3) 75
4> 0 ( D 100
4) 100 ( 1) 100
4) 100 ( D 100
4) 0
4) 0
4) 100
4) 0
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
4> 0
4) IOO
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 100
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
1) 100
D 100
1) 100
1) 0
1) 100
1) 100
1) 100
1) 100
1) 100
1) 100
1) 0
1) 100
1) 100
1) 0
D 100
i> too
1) 0
1) 100
1) 100
D 0
D 0
1) 100
D 0
1) 0
1) 0
D 0
1) 0
D 0
1) 0
1) 0
1) 0
1) 0
1) 0
1) 0
D 0
1) 0
1) 0
1) 0
D 0
D 0
D 0
1> 0
1) 0
D 0
D 0
1) 0
1) 0
1) 0
1 )
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
1)
1)
D
D
D
D
D
1)
D
D
1>
D
D
D
D
D
1)
D
D
1)
D
D
1)
1)
1 )
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
1 )
1)
D
D
D
D
D
D
CTED AT ANY SAMPLE POINT
NOT DETECTED
ER OF SAMPLES TAKEN

-------
                                               PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF POLLUTANT PARAMETERS


                                                                PLANT  3
              PARAMETER


             SELENIUM
INFL-

UENT
PRE CL

EFFL.
SEC.

EFFL
PRIH.
SLDO
COMB.

SLDO
 TAP
WATER
                                                                                                                 THICKENER
                                                                                                                 OVERFLOW
                                                     (10)
                                                                        0  ( 41  100  ( 3>  100  < 4)
                                                                                                           < 1)
                                                                                                                          ( I)
H-
CO
CO
A
                       NOT IISTEO WERE NOT  DETECTED AT ANY  SAMPLE  POINT
            UNCONFIRMED PESTICIDES UERE ASSUMED NOT DETECTED
            NimbL'RS IN PARENTHESES ARE THE  NUMBER OF SAMPLES  TAKEN
            PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY-TO BE VERIFIED

-------
  FRACTION

  CONVENT IONALS




  NON-CONVENTIONAL;
 VOLATILE*
 ACID EXTRACT
 BASE-NEUTRALS
                                              SUHMAHY CF ANALYTICAL DAtA

                                                      PLANT   4
PARAMETER

BOO
TOTAL  SUSP.  SOLIDS
COO
OIL  t  GREASE

TOTAL  PHENOLS
TOTAL  SOLIDS
TOTAL  DISS.  SOLIDS
SETTLE ABLE SOLID!,
TOTAL  VOLATILE  SOLIDS
VOLATILE 01SS.  SOLIDS
TOTAL  VOL. SUS.  SOLIDS
AMMONIA NITROGEN
TOC

BENIENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIOE
CHLOROBENZENE
  ,2-OICHLOROETHAIJE
  ,1,1-TRICHLOHOETHANE
  iti2-TRICHLOROETHANE
  , 1,2,2-TETRACHLOKOHMANE
  HLOROFORM
  tl-OICHLOKOETHVLENE
  , 2-TRAIJS-D1CHLOROETHYLENE
  .2-DICHLOROPROPANE
ETMYLBEN/ENE
HETHYLENE CHLORIDE
DICHLOR03ROMOMETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TR1CHLOROETHYLENE
VINYL CHLORIDE
2t4-OIMEIHYLPHENUL
2-N1TROPHENOL
2.4-D1N1TROPHENOL
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENOL

ACENAPHTHENE
UN M s
MG/L
HG/L
MG/L
MC/L
UC/L
MG/L
MG/L
HL/L
HG/L
HG/L
HG/L
HG/L
MG/L
UG/l
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UC/L
1NFLULM













L
L
L
L

t




I


L



t

L
L


152
It*
3*3
117
123
402
252
5
I7H
bO
tie
9
99
1
2
1
2
264
2
IB
e
13
25
1
44
282
1
385
36
497
33
3
2
50
9
16













L
L
L
L

L




L
L

L



L
I
L
L
L

SECONDARY PC^tl
EFFLUENT RcM.
22
43
81
16
2U
276
207
0
11 i
5)
29
0
3D
1
2
1
2
89
2
2
3
3
7
1
1
128
1
134
0
37
33
1
2
50
5
1
86
74
76
36
77
31
18
too
37
27
75
11
62




69

89
63
77
72

98
55

a5
100
93

67


44
94
COMBINED
SLUUGt
16300
59667
597b3
1012B
677
63583
1790
NOT RUN
34683
1050
29933
207
14538
40
270
N-D
N-0
507
441
43
1
2347
54993
4
1467
142
b4
958
984
467
N-0
N-D
N-0
N-0
25
103
UI&G3TEO
SLUDGE
5500
41917
34()63
9048
1158
45917
659
NUT RUN
21533
405
15067
523
11602
20
N-D
252
65
37
N-3
194
N-0
3
9800
7
910
16
K'l)
10
1647
120
27
14-1)
37
200
II -0
70
                                                      UG/L
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED HERE NEVER DETECTED
L-LESS THAN!    N-0  NOT DETECTEDI
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY^ TO BE VERIFIED
                                                             L  4
                                                                          L  4
                                                                                                 N-0
                                                                                                              65

-------
                                               SutirtAKY (j| ANALYTICAL  LAI*

                                                        PLANT   4
 fKACIICJN

 BASE-NLUIHALS
 HLSI ICIULS
 tit 1*1 i
                     1 ,2-DlCllLOkCbLI^Lt.t
                     l,3-OICHLO>4
11 1.5

6 o7
I do
3
j
a
u
3
2
3
3
3
15
<:
3J
20
b
163
5'J
5 )
2
I -jO
29 64
17 c,4
1 > CH
S3 5o
450 b4
7 i5
50
3 113
J23 ^0
SLJUCE
262
25<:
Hit
114
l.-u
64k>
IllCb
2650
427
K-Li
N*u
16
23
23
la
N-u
to2
H
c02
N-3
121
L 1000
L 1000
I 1030
I 1000
m
403
25
516
17SUC
lOoOO
193
41000
360000
256?
20
lit 7
143333
UldSlLU
SLuUCE
116
1C
4; >
•SI
N-J
<45
H437
H*00
33
H-'J
N~l/
59
25
i">
t9
2b
37S
^6
37t<
N-13
90
L 1000
L 1000
L 1 000
L 1000
116
333
30
660
25U33
11333
407
V>333
4o3333
3063
23

-------
                                                         SUMMARY |JF  ANALYTICAL  DATA

                                                                  PLANT    4
            FRACTION

            NON-CUNV.  METALS
PARAMETER

ALUMINUM
BARIUM
CALCIUM
IKON
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
SODIUM
UNITS
          INFLUtl.1
StCtNOARY  PCNT
EFI-LUINT   HEM.
CUHDINED
SLUDGt
OlGI-.SItC
SLUDGE
UG/L
LG/L
MG/L
LG/L
MG/L
UG/L
MG/L
2*60
133
11
73bU
3
633
3i
5U*
33
Jb
23!>S
2
179
29
76
75

tiH
J3
72
•J
NOT F.UN
NUT kON
KOI FUN
NOT FUU
KOI F.UN
NOT KUM
NOT RUN
NOT RLN
KOI RUN
NOT KUf.
NCIF NUN
NUT RUH
NOT RUN
NUT KUN
5TT  oo
CO  o
           POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED HtKE  NEVER  UEILCTEO
           L-LESS THANI    N-0  NOT OETECTtUl

           PRELIHINARY  DATA  ONLY-  TO  BE VERIFIED

-------
                                                                MASS I   ,>Nq£  IN  LbS.  PER PAY

                                                                           PLANT 4
             1-hACTION
             LONVENIIONALS
             NUN-CONVENTIONALS
             VOLATILEb
CO
•O
/I
                                 PAkAMETER
TOTAL SUSP.  CtlllDS
COD
OIL t GKEAiiE

TOTAL T'tlENOlS
TOTAL BOLIbS
TO1AL DISS.  SOLIUS
TOTAL VOLATILE  SOLIDS
VOLATILE  HISS.  SOLIDS
TOTAL VOL.  SUS.  SOLIDS
AMMONIA NITKOOEN
TOC

BENZENE
CARBON TETKACULOMDE
Ctll.OKODENZENE
1 ,2-mCHLOKOETIIANt
1 > 1 , 1 - IK I CHLOROE THANE
\>\, 2-TRICHLOKOETHANE
lr 1 .2>2-TETfcACHLOK-O£THANE
CHLOROETIIANE
BIBICMLOKOME IHYl >  ETHER
2-CHLOKOETIIYL  VINYL ETHER
CHLOROFORM
1 . 1-DICHLOKOETHYLENE
1 . 2-TRANS-tiICHlOROETHYLENE
1 ,2-DICHLUROF-ROPANE
ETHYL BENZENE
HETHYLENE CHLORIDE
DICHLORObKOMOHETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
VINYL CHLORIDE

2. 4-OIMETHYl PHtNOL
2-NITROPHENOL
2.4-bINITROf'HtNOL
F'ENTACHLOKOI IIENOL
PHENOL

ACENAPHTHtML
1,2 lilCHI ,OKTI[itN7LNE
I , J bICHt  OKUl'tN/l Ht
1 .4 II I CHI  UKOLiLN?ENE
FLIUIRANrilLNE
             ACID  EXIKACT
                  -NEU1RA1 8
                                 NAHUIIA1 LIJL

            t.imuiNLD  UlllblJE OUAN11IY  Id  Mill  INLMIUitU IN  TOTAL OUT COLUMN  (INCLUHLD IN DIBESTED SLUDOE)
            MK1IIIANIS  NOT  LISIEU WtKE NEVER liEIECIED
            I  Ittiti  THAN*   N-b  Nil I l>ULCILLl>
            I Ivtl IM1NARY bATA ONLY ---1O fc£  V£f;IFILb
INK1.UENT
105745
113996
239031
81691
85642
2B02B3
173351
123757
35778
B 1342
6.4
49237
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-0
198
N-D
12.8
N-D
NOT RUN
N-0
3.5
8.7
17.4
N-0
30.9
197
N-D
268
25.0
346
N-D
1.4
N-D
N-D
3.8
9.8
N-D
73.4
N D
9.4
N 1
N-D
35.3
1UTAL OUT
2U734
1JUU2
141763
33451
22333
307411
145738
131552
41103
57871
7.1
53404
L 0.1
N-0
.6
.2
41.9
N-D
1.3
L 0.1

L 0.1
2.1
2.2
29.4
L 0.1
2.3
89.0
N-D
93.2
4.1
24.2
L 0.1
N-D
L 0.1
.3
N-D
.5
.2
4.4
L 0.1
2.9
. 1
1 .4
1 . 1
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
14*90
29632
56591
11039
19438
192665
144092
77740
40090
20219
5.8
26611
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
61.8
N-D
1.0
N-0
NOT -RUN
N-D
2,1
2.2
3.1
N-D
N-D
89.0
N-D
93.2
1.5
23.9
N-D
N-D
N-D
W-0
N-D
.3
N-D
4.1
N-D
1.8
N-D
L 0.1
N-D
DIGESTED
SLUDGE
13744
104750
85174
22412
2893
114744
1444
53812
1013
37452
1.3
28993
L 0.1
N-D
.4
.2
L 0.1
N-D
.5
1- 0.
L 0.
L 0.
L 0.
L 0.
24.5
L O.I
2.3
L O.I
N-D
L 0.1
4.4
.3
L 0.1
N-D
L 0. 1
.3
N-0
.2
.2
.3
L 0.1
1.1
.1
N-D
1 . 1
                                                                                                                                     SLUunt
304B8
99405
99599
16874

1127
105930
2982
57782
1742
49849
     .3
S9707

L  0.1
     ,4
   N-D
   N-D
     .8
     .7
L  0.1
   N-0
   NO
   N-D
L  0.1
   3.9
   91. A
L  0.1
   2.4
     .2
     .1
    1.6
    1.4
     .8
   N-D

   N-D
    N-D
    N-D
 L  0.1
     .2

    N-D
     .5
     .4
    1.9
     .2
    H Ll
    1 .1

-------
                                                              MASS BALANCE  IN LBS. PER PAY

                                                                        PLANT 4
             FRACTION

             BASE-NEUTRALS
             PESTICIDES
             HETAL8
g*
             NON-CONV.  METALS
PARAMETER

N-NITROSGDIHE1HYLAMINE
BIS(2-ETIIYLMEXYL> PHTHALATE
BUTYL BENZYL PlirilALATE
DI-N-BUTYL PHTMALATE
DIETHYL FHTHALATE
li2-BENZANTHRACENE
3t4-BENZOFLUORANTHENE
11.12-BENZOFLUORANTHENE
CHRYSENE
ACENAPMTHYLENE
ANTHRACENE
FLUORENE
PHENANTHRENE
INDENO PYRENE
PYRENE

DIELDRIN
HEPTACHLOR
ALPHA-BHC
GAMMA-DMC

ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
ZINC

ALUMINUM
DARIUH
CALCIUM
IRON
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
SODIUM
INFLUENT
N-D
21.5
11,5
12.3
5.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
.2
N-D
,2
.6
N-D
L O.t
L 0.1
N-D
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
1.6
54.0
32.4
25.6
BB.3
.?
14.2
N-D
12.2
344
1715
105
11272
5130
1775
163
22077
T01AL OUT
2.1
29.0
12.2
4.4
.2
L 0.
L 0.
L 0.
L 0.
L 0.
, '
L 0.
,
N-D
.2
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
.1
.3
.8
L 0.1
1.9
05.7
50.2
V.I
160
-
12.7
L 0.1
8.2
585
_
-
-
-
-
-
-
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
I 0.1
7.7
1.2
4.3
.2
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
.3
20.3
11.7
8.1
36.7
.3
5.0
N-D
2.3
156
407
26.3
25216
164?
1374
125
20452
DIGESTED
SLUDGE
N-D
21.1
11.0
L 0.1
N-D
L 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
.7
I 0.1
.7
N-D
.2
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
.3
.8
L 0.1
1.6
65.4
38.3
1.0
123
NOT RUN
7.7
L 0.1
5.7
42?
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
                                                                                                                                CUHDINED
                                                                                                                                SLIIIiUr
  N -D
  13.4
  4.4
    .7
  N-D
  0.1
  0.1
  O.t
  0.1
                                                                                                                                    1.0
                                                                                                                                    0.1
                                                                                                                                    1.0
                                                                                                                                    N-D
   N-D
   N-D
   N-D
   N-D

    .2
    .7
L  0.1
    .7
  27.4
  18,0
    .3
  613,3
NOT RUN
   4.3
L  0.1
   3.3
23?

NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NO I RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
            COMBINED SLUDGE QUANTITY IB NOT INCLUDED IN TOTAL OUT COLUMN  (INCLUDED  IN  DIGESTED  SLUDGE)
            POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED WERE NEVER DETECTED
            L-LESS THANI   N-D  NOT DETECTEDI
            PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY	TO BE VERIFIED

-------
                                    PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF POLLUTANT PARAMETERS

                                                      PLANT  «;
              PARAMETER

              1.1.1-IR1CHLOROETHANE
              CHLOROFORM
              1.2-TRAN8-BICHLOROETHYLENE
              HETHVLENE CHLORIDE
              TR1CMLOROETHYLENE
              PENTACIILORPPHENOL
              PHENOL
              1 i 2-DICHLOROBENZENE
              NAPHTHALENE
              BIS42-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
              BUTYL  BENZYL PHTHALATE
              OI-N-BUTYL  PHTHALATE
              DIETMYL  PHTHALATE
              CHROMIUM
              COPPER
              LEAD
              MERCURY
              SILVER
              ZINC
              I.1>2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
f~k           1.1-DICHLOROETIIYLENE
f i           ETHYLBENZENE
*~           TOLUENE
V*V  CO       1.4-DICHLOROSENZENE
A    l*»       CYANIDE
              NICKEL
              TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
              CADMIUM
              2,4-DIMCTIIYLPHENOL
              OAMMA-DHC
              DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
              ANTHRACENE
              PHENANTIIRENE
              INDEN041.2.3-C.D) PYRENE
              DIELDRIN
              IIEPIACHLOR
              BENZENE
              CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
              CHIOROBENZENE
              1.2-DICHLOROETHANE
              I , I .2-TRICHLOROETHANE
              1,2-bICHLOROFROPANE
              01 CHI OROBROMOHE1HANE
              VINYL  CHI OR1DE
              2  NIlkOt-HENOL
              2.4  DIN!IRGPHENOL
              ACLNAFUIHENE
              1 . J  IMI 111 OKOBLNZENE
              M  UUKANIIItNE
              1SOHIOKONE
              1,2  bENZANIHKACENE
            lOUUIAHIS NOT LISTED UERE NOT
            UNCONFIRMED  PESTICIDES UERE ASSUMED NOT DETECTED
            NUHbEKS IN PARENTHESES ARE THE  NUMBER OF SAMPLES TAKEN
            FKELIMINARY  DATA ONLY-TO BE VERIFIED

INFLUENT
100
100
100
100
100
100
too
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
63
63
61
63
63
63
63
47
67
SO
SO
17
17
17
17
17
17
Q
o
Q
0
Q
Q
Q
0
o
Q
0
4>
4>
4)
4>
A)
4)
4>
4>
4»
4>
4>
4>
4>
A)
4)
At
4)
4>
4>
4>
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4>
4>
4)
4)
0 ( 6 >
0 < 4>
0 44)
0 < 6>
CTED AT ANY
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
100
100
100
100
100
0
SO
SO
0
100
63
100
33
too
too
63
100
33
100
30
63
0
17
SO
47
33
100
17
0
47
0
0
0
Q
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Q
0
0
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4>
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
6)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4>
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4>
41
4>
4)
4)
41
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
0 < 4>
0 ( 4)
33 < 4)
0 ( 4)
SAMPLE POINT
COMBINED
SLUDGE
50 (
17 <
100 4
100 (
too <
30 (
47 <
SO (
100 (
too <
47 (
63 (
0 <
100 (
100 <
100 <
100 <
100 <
too <
40 (
33 (
63 (
100 <
47 <
100 (
100 (
63 <
100 (
0 (
0 <
0 <
100 (
100 <
0 (
0 <
0 (
100 (
33 <
0 (
0 <
40 (
17 <
30 (
0 (
0 (
0 <
0 <
33 (
63 (
0 <
33 (



4)
4)
4)
4)
3)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
3)
4)
4)
3)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4>
4>
4)
4>
4)
41
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
41
4)
3)
4>
4>
4>
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4>
4>

DIGESTED
SLUDGE
17
0
B3
30
33
0
30
SO
100
100
100
33
0
too
100
100
100
100
100
33
17
too
100
47
100
100
33
100
0
0
0
too
100
0
0
0
63
0
47
17
0
33
0
17
33
17
17
17
47
0
33



< 4>
( 4)
( 4)
( 4)
( 4>
< 4)
< 4)
( 4)
< 4)
( 4)
( 4>
( 4)
< 4)
( 4)
< 4>
< 4)
< 4>
( 4)
( 4)
( 41
( 4)
( 4)
< 4)
4 4)
< 4)
< 4)
< 4)
< 4)
( 4)
( 4)
< 4)
< 4>
( 4)
< 4>
< 4)
< 4)
( 4)
( 4)
< 4>
( 4)
< 4)
4 4)
( 4)
( 4)
4 4)
( 4)
< 4)
4 4>
4 4)
< 4)
4 4)


-------
                                   PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF POLLUTANT PARAMETERS

                                                    PLANT  4
              PARAMETER

             3r 4-BENZOFLUORANTHENE
             11r12-BENZOFLUORANTMENE
             CHRY6ENE
             ACENAPHTIIYLENE
             FLUORENE
             PYRENE
             ALPHA-BHC
             ANTIMONY
             ARSENIC
             BERYLLIUM
             SELENIUM

INFLUENT
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0


«>
4)
A)
4)
6)
A)
At
A)
At
A)
A)
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
0
0
O
0


At
A)
At
• At
61
At
At
At
At
t 61
I At
COMBINED
ELUDOE
17 <
17 (
33 (
0 <
33 (
83 (
0 (
100 <
100 (
100 <
100 (


At
At
6t
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
DIGESTED
SLUDGE
17 <
17 (
33 (
17 <
17 (
100 1
0 <
100. <
100 1
100 (
100 (


A>
4)
4)
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
    oo
O
 A
            POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED UERE HOT DETECTED AT ANY SAMPLE POINT
            UNCONFIRMED PESTICIDES UERE ASSUMED NOT DETECTED
            NUMBERS IN PARENTHESES ARE THE NUMBER OF SAMPLES TAKEN
            PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY-TO BE VERIFIED

-------
                                                      SUMMARY  OF  ANALYTICAL [>ATA

                                                                PLANT   5
         I RACIION
         LONUENIIUNALS
         NUN -C UNVEN TIONAL8
         VOLATILEB
CO
tn
PARAMETER

bOU
TOTAL SUSP.  SOLIDS
COb
OIL t GREASE

TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS
TOTAL DISS.  SOLIDS
SEITLEADLE  SOLIDS
TOTAL VOLATILE  SOLIDS
VOLATILE DISS.  SOLIDS
TOTAL VOL.  BUS.  SOLIDS
AMMONIA NITROGEN
TUC

ilENZENE
CHLOftOBENZENE
1. l.l-TRICHLOROETHANE
l>If2.2-TETHACHLOROETHANE
2-CHLOftOETHYL VINYL ETHER
CHLOROFORM
1>I-DICHLOROETHYLENE
1r2-TRANS-DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPAME
1.3-DICHLONOPROPYLENE
ETHYLDENZENC
HETHYLENE CHLORIDE
HETHYL CHLORIDE
01 CIILOHObkOttOHE THANE
CHLOROll I BROHOHE THANE
TEIftACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
VINYL CHLORIDE

2i 4-OICIILOROPHENOL
2.4-DIHETHYLPHENOL
PENTACHLOROPHENQL
PHENOL

ACENAPHTMENE
1 ,2-DICHLOKOliENZENE
I ,4-OJCHl ONOB£N2£HE
F1UOMANTIIENE
NAPHTHA1 ENE
Dili (2 LTHYLHEXYL) PHTHALAIE
DUTVL bUUM PHTHALAIL
111 N-bUI YL  PH1HAI ATE
DI N OCItl   PHIIIALATE
DIE1HYL PHIHALAIE
       (OltUIANrS NOT LISTED UEKE  NEVER DETECTED
       L tlSS  THANi     N-D  NOT  DETECTED)
       IhELIHINARY DATA ONLY	TO  bt  VERIFIED
         ACID EXTRACT
         UASE-NEUIfcALa
UNITS
NG/L
MO/L
HO/L
HG/L
UO/L
MO/L
MG/L
HL/L
HO/L
HO/L
HO/L
HO/L
HO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UQ/L
UO/L
UO/L
UG/L
UQ/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
INFLUENT











I







I





I
L

L

L
L
L
L




L

I 3D
147
374
33
30
86?
742
7
480
340
120
12
64
5
0
19
1
8
12
0
2
0
4
10
474
34
3
1
115
37
49
33
1
0
S
1
4
S
S
3
3
28
6
3
4
2



L






L
I

L
L
I
L


I





L
L
L
L

L
L
I
L
I

I
L
L
I
SECONDARY PCNT
EFFLUENT REN.
13
12
48
3
a
693
683
1
371
340
11
7
14
1
1
3
1
a
7
i
2
1
2
1
468
34
2
1
26
0
14
33
1
1
S
0
4
S
S
3
3
4
2
2
4
2
91
92
82
91
73
22
8
84
23
91
42
78
80

84


42



30
90
31

33

77
100
71




100





79
67
33


conn.
SLUDGE
13471
24433
33283
4168
?9
29864
3431
992
4S7
2424
19182
33
7327
42
N-D
N-D
40
N-6
2
22
1341
8
N-D
146
101
43
N-D
3
14
199
143
3292
N-D
N-D
N-D
27
20
3
13
N-D
118
3398
430
N-D
47
N-D
PIOESTEH
SLUDGE
3182
17438
12712
2746
238
18407
1016
860
161
339
8362
419
1273
5
1
2
43
0
6
N-D
22
N-D
N-0
73
11
9
N-0
1
N-D
124
2
117
4
N-D
i
48
13
N-D
6
10
32
4170
IS2
N-D
40
N-D

-------
                                                         SUHMARr  OF  ANALYTICAL  DATA

                                                                  PLANT    5
             FRACTION
             BASE-NEUTRALS
             PESTICIDES
             METALS
H-

 A
             NON-CONV.  METALS
PARAMETER

ANTHRACENE
PMENANTMRENE
PTRENE

BETA-PMC
GAMMA-BHC

ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
ZINC

ALUMINUM
BARIUM
CALCIUM
IRON
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
SODIUM
UNITS
UO/L I
UG/L L
UG/L I
NO/L L
NG/L I
UO/L L
UO/L I
UO/L
UO/L
UG/L
UO/L
UG/t
UO/L
UO/L
UG/L I
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
MG/L
UO/L
HO/L
UO/L
HG/L
INFLUENT
3
3
2
1000
1000
50
30
1
*
102
70
12
67
1?
50
23
24P
817
101
74
1S92
20
234
B9
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
L 3
L 3
L 2
12
55
L 50
L 50
L 2
1
35
31
5
4
L 10
I 50
2
44
155
54
70
274
27
203
87
PCNT
REM.



L
L



83
46
54
58
?4
17

91
73
81
47
5
77
4
13
2
COMB.
6LUDOE
92
92
10
1000
1000
55
78
4
385
8317
3000
221
8967
1077
S3
1103
23833
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
DIGESTED
SLUDGE
102
102
9
L 10OO
L 1000
52
49
4
312
7747
2747
28
9147
1240
41
BOO
241A7
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
            POLLUTANTS NOT  LISTED MERE NEVER DETECTED
            L-LESS THAM*     N-D  NOT DETECTED!
            PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY	TO BE VERIFIED

-------
                                           MASS BALANCE  IN LB8. PER PAY
                                                     PLANT
FRACTION
CONVENTIONAL8
NON-CONVENTIONAL 8
VOLATILE8
                     PARAMETER

                     BOO
                     TOTAL  SUSP.  SOLIDS
                     COD
                     OIL I  OREABE

                     TOTAL  PHENOLS
                     TOTAL  SOLIDS
                     TOTAL  DI8S.  SOLIDS
                     TOTAL  VOLATILE SOLIDS
                     VOLATILE DI68. SOLIDS
                     TOTAL  VOL.  BUS.  SOLIDS
                     AMMONIA NITROOEN
                     TOC

                     BENZENE
                     CHLOftOBENZENE
                     If1rI-TRICHLOROETHANE
                     ltlt2>2-TETRACHLOROETHAHE
                     2-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER
                     CHLOROFORM
                     1.1-DICHLOROETHYLENE
                     li2-TRAN8-DICHLOROETHYLENE
                     1'2-DICHLOROPROPANE
                     1.3-DICHLOROPROPYLENE
                     ETHYL BENZENE
                     HETHYLENE CHLORIDE
                     HETHYL CHLORIDE
                     DICHLOROBROHOMETHANE
                     CHLORODIBROMOHE THANE
                     TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
                     TOLUENE
                     TRICHLOROETHYLENE
                     VINYL  CHLORIDE

                     2.4-DICHLOROPHENOL
                     2.4-DIHETHYLPHENOL
                     PENTACHLOROPHENOL
                     PHENOL

                     ACENAPHTHENE
                     I>2-DICHLOROBENZENE
                     I>4-DICHLORObENZENE
                     FLUORANTHENE
                     NAPHTHA! ENE
                     BI8(2-ETIIYI HEXYL) PHTHALATE
                     BUTYL  BENZYL PHTHALA1E
                     OI-N-BUTYL  PHTHALATE
                     DI-N-OC1YL  PHIHALATE
                     DIETHYL PHtHAI ATE

t, LUNIl/llw  IftEAIHENT  SYSTEM ONLY
bl UDOE f-LOUS ADJUSTED  TO APPHOXIHATE FLOU UNDEROOINO SECONDARY TRATMENT ONLY
COMBINED SLUDOE  IS NOT  INCLUDED  IN TOTAL OUT COLUMN
POLLUTANIS NOT LISTED UERE NOT  DETECTED
I -I ESS THAN!  N-0  NOT  DETECTED!
PKELININARY DATA ONLY---TO BE  VERIFIED
ACID EXTRACT
bASE-NEUTRALB
INFLUENT
24890
24449
47323
3938
3.4
139934
133307
84343
44774
21391
2139
11433
1.0
L 0.1
3.4
.2
N-D
2.2
L 0.1
.4
I 0.1
.7
1.9
122
N-D
.3
.1
20.7
4.7
8.8
N-D
N-D
L O.I
N-D
.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
.4
3.0
1.0
.3
N-D
.3
TOTAL OUT
4755
24683
30294
4338
1 .8
131173
124339
44V8I
43222
13030
1912
4333
L 0.1
L 0.1
.3
L 0.1
L 0.1
1.3
N-D
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
.2
84.3
L 0.1
.4
.1
4.4
.3
2.3
.2
L 0.1
N-0
L 0.1
L O.I
L 0.1
N-D
1 0.1
I 0.1
t O.I
7.0
.2
N-D
L O.I
H-D
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
2249
2189
12293
4SO
1.4
123110
122921
44733
44714
2009
1319
2349
L 0.1
1 0.1
.3
N-D
N-D
1.3
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
84.3
N-D
.4
.1
4.4
L O.I
2.3
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
L O.I
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-0
1 .1
N-D
N-D
N-D
H-D
DI8ESTED
SLUDGE
4304
24494
18001
3888
,4
24043
1438
228
308
11841
393
1804
L 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
L O.I
t O.I
N-D
t 0.1
N-D
N-D
.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
N-D
L 0.1
N-D
.2
I 0.1
.2
L 0.1
N-D
1 0.1
L 0.1
1 0.1
N-0
L 0.1
L 0.1
I 0.1
3.9
.2
N-D
I 0.1
N-D
COMBINED
SLUDGE

11749
19817
24452
3139

L  0.1
22389
2372
492
1819
14380
  23.9
3443
L


L

L
L

L


L
L

L
L






L
L
L
L

L



L

O.I
N-D
N-D
0.1
N-0
O.I
O.I
1.2
0.1
N-D
.1
0.1
0.1
N-D
0.1
0.1
,1
.1
2.3
N-D
N-D
H-D
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
N-0
O.I
2.7
.3
N-0
0.1
N-D

-------
                                                       MASS BALANCE IN IBS, PER DAY

                                                                 PLANT   5
            FRACTION

            BASE-NEUTRALS



            PESTICIDES


            HETALB
            NON-CONV. HETALB
p-
M^l
^^^
 A
PARAMETER

ANTHRACENE
PHENANTHRENE
PYRENE

BETA-BHC
OAHHA-BHC

ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUH
CADHIUH
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
ZINC

ALUMINUM
BARIUM
CALCIUM
IRON
MAGNESIUM
MANOAHEBE
SODIUM
INFLUENT TOTAL
N-D
N-D
N-D L 0.
M-D L 0.
N-D L 0.
N-D L 0.
N-D 1 0.
.2 L 0.
SECONDARY
OUT EFFLUENT
N-D
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
DIGESTED
SLUDOE


L 0
N
.1
.1
•1
-D
N-D
L 0
L 0
L 0
1.0 .5* .1
16.4 17.3 4.3
12. 7.3 3.4
2. .7 .7
12. 13.7 .7
2. 1.8 N-D
N- 1 0.
I N-D
4.2 1.4 .3
44. S 44.0 11.8
147
18.1
13223
213
4748
42,2
14014
27.7
9.4
12333
47.2
4748
34.4
13484
It
3
L 0
13
1
L 0
1
34
NOT
NOT
NOT
NOT
NOT
NOT
NOT
.1
.1
.1
,4
.0
.7
.1
.0
.8
.1
.1
.2
RUN
RUN
RUN
RUN
RUN
RUN
RUN
COMBINED
SLUDGE
L
L
L


L
L
L






L
0.1
0.1
0.1
N-D
N-D
0.1
0.1
0.1
.3
6,2
2.2
.2
A. 7
.8
0.1
  17.7

NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
            SECONDARY  TREATMENT SYSTEM  ONLY
            SLUDOE  FLOWS  ADJUSTED  TO APPROXIMATE FLOU UNDERGOING SECONDARY  TRATMENT ONLY
            COMBINED SLUDOE  IS NOT INCLUDED  IN  TOTAL OUT  COLUMN
            POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED  HERE  NOT DETECTED
            L-LE8S  THAN)  M-D NOT DETECTEDI
            PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY	TO  BE VERIFIED

-------
                                     PERCENT  OCCURRENCE OF POLLUTANT PARAMETERS

                                                       PLANT   5
CT
A
 PARAMETER

llENZENE
I p1.1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CHLOROFORM
1,2  TRANS -bICHLOROEIHYLENE
ElHYLbENZENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
blClll QRObROMOME THANE
TEIKACHLOROETHVLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
bIS<^-ETIIYLHEXYL> PHTHALATE
bUIYL  BENZYL PHIHALATE
CAliniUH
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
SILVER
I INC
PHENOL
I,3-UICHLOROFROPYLENE
NAPHTHALENE
BI-N-bUIYL PHIHALATE
DIETUYL  PHTHALATE
NICKEL
I . 1 • 2.2- IE TRACIILOROC THANE
CHLORObJBROHOHETHANE
2t 4-bIHETHYLPIIENOL
KERYLL1UH
CHLOROBENZENE
1.1-KICHI OROETHYLENE
1 , 2  DICIIl OROPKOPANE
2  CIILOROETHYL UINYL ETHER
HtTIIVL CHLORIDE
VINYL  CHLORIDE
2. V DICIH OROCHENOL
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
ACENAPHTHENE
1.2  DICHLORObENZENE
1 , 4-IilCHLOROElENZENE
fLUORANTUENE
Ul-N-OCIYL PHTHALATE
ANIHRACENE
PHENANIHKENE
PYKENE
bt  TA-bllC
linttHrt  UIIC
AMIIHONY
AKtiLNIC
btlENIUH
            POIIIIIANIS NOT LISlEli  UEKE NOT IiETECTLb AT ANY  SAMPLE  POINT
            UNLONMRhED PESTICIDES UEKE ASSUMED  NOT DETECTED
            NUHtitKS  IN PARENTHESES ARE THE NUHbER  OF SAMPLES  TAKEN
            IhtllHINAKV DATA ONLY-TO BE VERIFIED

INFLUENT
100
too
100
too
too
too
too
too
too
too
too
too
too
too
too
too
too
100
100
63
67
so
so
so
50
33
33
33
33
17
17
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0


6)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4>
4)
A)
4>
4>
4>
4)
At
4>
6)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
A)
4)
4)
A)
A)
A)
41
4)
A)
A)
A)
A)
4)
A)
A)
A)
A)
4)
A)
A)
A)
A)
6)
4>
A >
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
SO
47
too
0
33
too
63
too
33
too
100
0
17
100
100
63
17
33
100
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
33
0
0
33
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
so
0
0
0


4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4>
4)
4>
4)
4>
4>
4»
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4>
4)
4>
4>
4>
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
COHblNEb
SLUDGE
too (
0 <
33 (
100 (
100 <
63 (
0 <
33 (
100 <
63 (
100 <
33 <
100 (
100 <
100 <
too <
100 <
100 <
100 <
33 <
0 (
SO (
0 (
0 (
100 (
20 4
20 <
0 (
too <
0 <
33 1
33 <
0 (
100 (
SO (
0 (
0 <
17 <
17 <
33 <
0 <
33 (
47 (
47 (
33 (
0 <
0 (
40 (
100 (
too <


4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
41
4)
4)
4)
4>
4>
4)
S>
3)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4>
4>
4)
4)
4)
3)
4)
4)
DIGESTED
SLUDGE
47
17
33
63
100
63
0
0
100
33
100
17
100
100
100
100
too
100
100
17
0
33
0
0
too
75
17
0
100
17
0
0
17
47
17
17
17
33
0
17
17
17
63
63
17
0
0
too
too
too


< 4)
( 4)
< 4)
( 4)
( 4)
< 4)
( 4)
( 4)
( 4>
I 4)
( 4>
< 4)
< 4)
< 4)
< 41
< 4)
< 4)
( 4>
< 4>
1 4)
< 4>
( 4)
4 4)
( 4)
< 4)
< 4>
< 4)
( 4)
< 4)
( 4)
< 4)
< 4>
< 4)
< 4)
< 4)
< 4)
( 4)
( 4)
< 4)
< 4)
< 4)
( 4)
< 4)
( 41
( 4)
( 4)
( 4)
< 4)
< 4)
< 4)

-------
                                                     SUMHAFY UF ANALYTICAL DATA

                                                              (•LiNT   6
         FKACT1UN

         CONVENTIONAL*
         NON-CONVbNTIONALS
         VOLATILES
«>
o
PARAMETER

600
TOTAL  SUSP.  SOL I OS
COD
OIL t  GREASE

TOTAL  PHENOLS
TOTAL  SOLIDS
TOTAL  OISS.  SULIOS
SETILEAOLE SOLIDS
TOTAL  VOLATKc  SULILS
VOLATILE D1SS.  SOLIDS
TOTAL  VOL. SUS. SOLIDS
AMMONIA NITRUliEN
TOC

DEN/tNE
CARBON TETKACIILUKlDE
CHLOROOEN2CNE
 i2-01CHLOROETHANE
 , 1,1-TRICIILURUETHANE
 .1-OICIILURObTHANt
 ,l,2-TRICIILOHOfc!MAf.[
 , 1,2.2-ILIRACHLOKUEIHAIIE
 HLOROE TrIANL
 HLOKOFOMM
 .1-DICHLOROETHYLENt
 (2-TRANS-DlCHLORUEThYLENt
ETHYL3ENZENL
METHYLENE CHLJftlOL
METHYL CHLUKIOE
01CriLOROHROMOME THANt
TR1CHLOROFLUOKOHETHANE
TLTRACHLOKOEIHYLCNE
TOLUENE
TRICHLUKULIHYLENt
VIMYL CHLOBIDU
                           PARACHLOROMETA  CKESUL
                           2>4-OICHLUPOPHEt.L'L
                           PENTACHLORUPHCKUL
                           PHENOL
       POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED  HERE  NEVER  CEUCltL
       L-LESS THANI     N-0  NOI  DETECIEDI
       PRELIMINARY  DATA ONLY- TO BE VERIFIED
        ACIO EXTRACT
uum
MG/L
hG/L
MG/L
MC-/1
UG/L
HO/L
MG/L
UL/L
MG/L
M&/L
IfC/L
MG/L
Mt/L
UG/l
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UC/L
L'G/L
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UC/L
LG/L
H.fLULNI
26)
632
90
1
3i
33
1
6
y
1V1
467
IC96
9
1
IS
1
SICUNUARY
EFFLUCNT
18
^7
131
t
38
683
646
17
1)^
117
lu
12
»0
0
L 2
L 1
1
47
1
I I
L 1
I IS
3
0
9
I 1
23
L 34
0
6
a
i)
b4
101
1
L 1
2
0
(>CrU
KLH.
93
>6
rt<,
•)6
08
•>o
5
•17
(I
27
97
40
90
100


91
()•>
')8



50
100
n

38fc
4936
4672
53717
4bl8
1625
4139f.
36i
41017
62
24006
12
10
G
N-0
33
212
N-D
N-0
167
N-0
N-D
t)7B
317
64
N-0
N-D
N-0
51'
475
32
J40GO
N-0
N-t,
h-D
Kti'ti
UIGtSUI!
SlUPGt
lt>B56
4775d
51 7(17
494H
7420
49232
114J
1775
37662
445
37250
585
25625
11
M-D
0
N-0
N-0
N-0
h-\l
1
1800
N-0
N-U
116
392

I.-U
1833

-------
                                              SUIIHAfcY lif ANALYTICAL LAlA

                                                       HANI   t>
 fRACIlON

 BASE-NEUTRALS
H
!f*
/I
 MLIALS
 NON-CUNV. MLtALS
PAKAH£I£R

ACCNAPilIHENt
1 ,3-OICHLOkQbEN^uht
1.1-OltHLOKUBtNjENl
2.1-OINItRQTOLUtNt
NAPHHULEHL
BlS(2-ETIIKLHtXYL) HHIHALAU
BUTYL BEN/YL PKIHALAIE
OI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
OlETMYL PHIIIALATE
CHRYSENE
ANTHRACENE
1.12-bENZQPERYLENE
FLUORENE
PIIENANIHRElJt

AN 1 1 HOMY
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
GIROHIUH
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
ScLENIUM
SILVER
ZINC

ALUMINUM
BARIUM
CALCIUM
                     MAGNESIUM
                     MANGANESE'
                     SOOIUM
(Hi I T S
UU/l
UG/L
UG/L
tu/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/l
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
LG/L
UG/L
UG/L
NG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
hG/L
UG/L
hC/L
UG/L
UC/L
INILJuM
1
3
1
1
1
61
L 5
38
16
I 5
I 5
52
6
L 5
52
I 5G
I 50
L £
1076
I3'>0
76G

19S
3233
701
L 50
15

i3to
302
56
7363
15
265
111
SECLNIURY
CFeLUEliI
1
L 1
L 1
1
L 2
9
0
11
2
1
1
11
1
0
11
L 50
L 50
L 2
65
62
17
3U1
1U
200
291
L 50
3
175
131
31
1b
121
13
151
131
£i!!

67



U6

71
i>7


11
d3

79



91
96
91

91
91
56

uO
90
-M
90
lu
91
1 i
,7
5
PKIMAxY
S4.UOGL
N-0
IJ-0
N-C>
U-J
N-3
'.200
1500
513
N-0
565
5t>5
1505
N-G
N-0
1505
393
313
11
8250G
71333
51333
2<123
Iol67
601611
1700C
lt>^
t23
36G6t 7
NOT KUN
1.01 RUN
NCI tUN
(JOT I-UU
NOT fU<4
NOT KUN
NOT RUN
CIG.STll.
SLU'J&E
N-0
N-0
N-0
N-li
(I-U
108b
N-0
N-0
N-0
12
62
99^
N-0
N-0
991
3'-U
212
9
79b33
73033
16O30
17597
966?
1U666f
17500
152
802
365000
NUT RUN
NOT HUN
NUI KUN
i;ci KUN
NUI RUN
NOI RUN
NOT RUN
           NUT LISTED  hJLKt  NLVLK DC It L HO
L-LCSS  lilAN)    N-D  NUT  ULILCUUI
I'KtLIMINAKY HAIA ONLY-  10 8E  VERIFIED

-------
                                            MASS BALANCE IN IBS.  PER DAY

                                                      PLANT   4
 FRACTION
 CONVENTIONAL8
 NON-CONVENTIONALS
 VOLATILEB
PARAMETER

BOD
TOTAL SUSP. SOLIDS
COD
OIL I GREASE

TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS
TOTAL DI88. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDS
VOLATILE DI88. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOL. BUS. SOLIDS
AHHONIA NITROGEN
TOC

BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
CHLORODENZENE
1>2-DICHLOROETHANE
1.1t1-TRICHLOROETHANE
Irl-DICHLOROETHANE
1f1r2-TRICHLOROETHANE
1t1i2r2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
CHI.OROETHANE
CHLOROFORM
Irl-DICHLOROETHYLENE
lr2-TRAN3-DICHLOROETHYLENE
ETHYLBENZENE
HETHYLENE CHLORIDE
HETHYL CHLORIDE
DICHLOROBROHONETHANE
TRICHLOROFLUOROHETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
VINYL CHLORIDE

PARACHLOROHETA CRE80L
2.4-DICHLOROPHENOL
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENOL

ACENAPHTHENE
1t3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1t 4-DICHLOROBENZENE
2r4-DINITROTOLUENE
NAPHTHALENE
BIS<2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
1,2-BENZANTHRACENE
PRIMARY SLUDOE IB NOT INCLUDED IN TOTAL OUT COLUMN
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED MERE NOT DETECTED
L-LEB9 THANI  N-D  NOT DETECTED)
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY	TO BE VERIFIED
 ACID EXTRACT
 BASE-NEUTRALS
INFLUENT
13447
37140
53141
3184
10.2
80349
37844
39944
9439
31149
1157
22945
L 0.1
H-D
N-D
.4
24.3
.5
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
.3
2.3
2.1
L 0.1
1.9
2.0
L 0.1
.3
.3
11.2
29. «
99.9
.3
L 0.1
.9
L 0.1
L 6,
,
L 0.
L 0.
L 0,
3.8
N-D
2.2
.9
N-D
TOTAL OUT
3605
8729
15449
869
3.3
47320
38143
13390
4948
£463
794
4173
L 0.1
N-D
L 0.1
L 0.1
2.8
L 0.1
N-D
L 0.1
.3
.2
L 0.1
.4
L 0.1
1.3
N-D
t O.I
.4
t 0.1
1.3
3.8
11.0
L 0.1
N-D
L 0.1
.3
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
I 0.1
N-D
1.1
I 0.1
.4
.1
L O.I
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
1078
1568
7704
127
2.2
40138
37972
7743
6881
1078
706
2333
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
2.8
I 0.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
.2
L 0.1
.4
N-D
1.3
N-D
I 0.1
.4
i 0.1
1.2
3.8
3.9
L 0.1
N-D
L 0.1
L 0.1
L 0,1
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
N-D
.3
L 0.1
.4
.1
L 0.1
DIGESTED
SLUDGE
2527
7141
7763
742
1.1
7382
171
5447
46.7
5583
87.7
3842
L 0.1
N-D
L O.I
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
.3
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
L 0.1
I 0.1
3.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
.3
H-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
.6
N-D
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
PRIMARY
SLUDGE

5455
15396
14609
1496

   1.4
14109
1383
12415
114
12300
  24.3
7200
L
L
L

t
L


I



I
L



I

L

O.I
0.1
O.I
H-D
0.1
0.1
N-D
N-D
0.1
N-D
N-D
.3
O.I
0.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
O.I
.1
O.I
10.2
    N-D
    N-D
    N-D
     .3

    N-D
    N-D
    N-D
    N-D
    N^D
    1.4
     .4
     .2
    N-D
     .2

-------
                                                  MASS BALANCE IN LBS. PER DAY

                                                            PLANT   4
       FRACTION

       llASE-NEUTRALS
       ME ML B
        NOH-C0NU.  METALS
8
PARAMETER

CHRYSENE
ANTHRACENE
I.I2-BENZOPERYLENE
FLUORENE
PHENANTHRENE

ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
ZINC

ALUMINUM
BARIUM
CALCIUM
IRON
MAGNESIUM
MANOANEBE
SODIUM
INFLUENT
N-D
3.0
.]
N-D
3.0
N-D
N-D
N-D
43.3
81.8
44.7
3.8
11.7
.2
41.2
N-D
,y
290
140
17.8
3284
433
882
14. 8
8312
TOTAL OUT
1

L
L

I
L
L





I

L









0. 1
.7
0. 1
0.1
.7
0.1
O.I
0.1
13.8
14.7
9.7
23.3
2.3
O.I
19.9
0.1
.3
82.4
_
-
-
_
-
-
-
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
L 0.1
.4
L 0.1
L 0.1
.4
N-0
N-D
N-D
3.8
3.4
2.8
22.9
1.1
L O.I
17.3
N-D
.2
27. V
7.9
1.8
2723
24.8
743
8.9
7841
DIGESTED
SLUDOE
t 0.1
.1
N-D
N-D
. 1
I 0.1
I O.I
I 0.1
12.0
11.1
4.9
2.4
1.4
L O.I
2.4
L O.I
.1
34.7
NOT RUN
MOT RUM
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
MOT RUN
NOT RUN
MOT RUN
PRIMARY
SLUDOE

    .2
    .3
   N-D
   N-0
    .5
t  0.1
I  O.I
  24.7
  22.9
  19.4
   A. 6
   4.8
     .2
   S.I
L  0.1
     .2
114

MOT RUM
MOT RUN
MOT RUM
NOT RUN
MOT RUN
NOT RUN
HOT RUM
      PK1HARY  BlUDOt  IS  NOT  INCLUDED IN TOTAL  OUT  COLUMN
      POLLUTANTS  NOT  LISTED  WERE  NOT DETECTED
      I  I ESS THAN!  N-D   NOT  DETECTED*
      PHELIMINARY DATA ONLY	TO  BE  VERIFIED

-------
                       PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF POLLUTANT PARAMETERS

                                        PLANT  A
I  I
  PARAMETER

  J.2-TRANB-DICHLOROETHYLENE
  METIIYLENE CHLORIDE
  METHYL CHLORIDE
  TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
  TOLUENE
  TRICHLOROETHYLENE
  VINYL CHLORIDE
  PENTACHLOROPHENOL    ,
  DIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL> PHTHALATE
  CADMIUM
  CHROMIUM
  COPPER
  CYANIDE
  LEAD
  MERCURY
  NICKEL
  SILVER
  ZINC
  1r1r1-TRICHLOROETHANE
  Irl-DICHLOROETHANE
  CHLOROFORM
  ANTHRACENE
  PHENANTHRENE
  BENZENE
  If1-DICHLOROETUYLENE
  TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
 PARACHLOROHETA CREBOL
 DIETHYL PHTHALATE
  DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
  1r2-DICHLOROETHANE
 ETHYLBENZENE
 DICHLOROBROMOMETHANE
 PHENOL
  1 rl.2-TRICHLOROETHANE
 2r4-DICHLOROPHENOL
 ACENAPHTHENE
 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
 1r 4-DICHLOROBENZENE
 2.4-DINITROTOLUENE
 NAPHTHALENE
 1>12-BENZOPERYLENE
 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
 CHLOROBENZENE
 1r1F2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
 CHLOROETHANE
 BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
 1,2-BENZANTHRACENE
 CHRYSENE
 FLUORENE
 ANTIMONY
 ARSENIC
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED UERE NOT DETECTED
UNCONFIRMED PESTICIDES UERE ASSUMED NOT
NUMBERS IN PARENTHESES ARE THE NUMBER OF
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY-TO BE VERIFIED

INFLUENT
100 < A)
too < A>
100 ( 6)
too ( A>
ipo
100
100
too
too
100
100
100
100
too
100
loo
100
100
63
83
83
83
83
47
A7
67
67
67
50
33
33
33
33
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4)
4)
A)
4)
4)
«>
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
6)
4)
4)
6)
4>
4)
A)
4)
4)
A)
4)
4>
4)
6)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
6)
A)
4)
A)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
A)
4)
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
100
too
0
33
100
100
100
33
B3
100
100
too
67
67
83
100
17
100
too
47
100
83
83
17
17
83
50
50
83
17
0
33
33
0
0
SO
0
0
33
0
17
0
0
0
0
17
33
33
17
0
4)
4)
4)
6)
4)
A>
4)
A)
4)
4)
4)
61
A)
4)
4)
A>
4)
A)
A)
A)
*>
4>
A)
4)
6}
A)
4)
A)
4)
4)
4)
6)
4)
4)
6)
4)
4)
A)
A>
6)
4)
6}
A)
A)
A)
A)
A)
A)
6)
.4)
0 ( 4)
PRIMARY
SLUDGE
47
A7
0
100
100
83
too
0
100
100
100
too
100
100
too
100
100
100
33
83
0
100
100
100
0
o
0
o
47
Q
100
0
100
0
0
o
Q
0
o
0
0
17
17
0
17
83
too
100
0
100
too
A)
4)
A>
4)
4)
4)
A)
4)
A)
A)
4)
A)
6)
4>
A)
4)
4)
4)
4)
A)
A)
A)
4)
4)
4)
A)
A)
4)
A)
A)
4)
A)
4)
4)
A)
A)
A)
A)
4)
4)
A)
A)
4)
4>
4)
A)
A)
4)
4)
4)
A)
DIGESTED
SLUDGE
100 ( A)
83 ( A)
0 ( 4)
100
100
33
100
0
100
100
100
too
100
100
100
100
too
100
0
0
0
80
80
A7
0
0
0
0
0
0
too •
0 '
A)
A)
4)
4)
A)
S)
A)
A>
A)
A)
A)
A>
A)
A)
4>
A)
A)
A)
S>
5)
A)
A)
A)
A>
5)
5)
A)
A>
A)
100 ( A)
0 ( A)
0 ( 6)
0 ( 5)
0
o
0
0
Q
0
17
17
47
Q
20
20
0
100
100
3>
5)
5>
5)
5)
A)
A>
A)
A)
5)
5)
5)
3)
A)
A)
CTED AT ANY 8AHPLE POINT
NOT DETECTED
ER OF SAMPLES

TAKEN





-------
                               PERCENT OCCURRENCE  OF  POLLUTANT PARAMETERS

                                                 PLANT  6

                                                          SECONDARY      PRIMARY      DIGESTED
          PARAMETER                         INFLUENT       EFFLUENT       SLUDG?       SLUDGE
         bERYLLIUM                            0      <  4)     0      (4)  100    ( 4)  100      (  4)
         SELENIUM                             0      <  4)     0      (4)  106    ( 4)  100      <  4)
to
en
       IOLLUTANIS  NUI  LISTED UERE NOT DETECTED AT ANY  SAMPLE  POINT
       UNCONFIRMED PESTICIDES UERE ASSUMED NOT DETECTED
       NUHIfEfvS  IN  PARENTHESES ARE HIE NUMKER OF SAMPLES  TAKEN
       PRELIMINARY DATA  ONLY'TO BE VERIFIED

-------
                                                               SUWAKY IF ANALYIIC/.L UATA
            FRACTION
            CONVENTIOHALS
           NON-CONVENTIONALS
P-


A
           VOLATILES
                   PARAMETER

                   (500
                   TOIAl  SUSP.  SJL1CS
                   COD
                   OIL t  GRLASL

                   TOTAL  PHENOLS
                   TOTAL  SOLIDS
                   TOTAL  DISS.  SULIOi
                   SETTLtAGLL SOLIDS
                   TOTAL  VOLATILE SOLIDS
                   VOLATILE UISS. SOLIDS
                   TOTAL  VOL. SUS.  SCLIDS
                   AflHUHIA NllRbGEN
                   IOC

                   BENZENE
                   CHLOROBENZENE
                    ,1,1-TRICHLURUETHANt
                    • 1-OICHLDKOtfHAr.l
                    ,1,2,2-TETRACIILCf.OCTHANt
                    HLOROFORH
                    .Z-TRANS-UICHLOROiTNYLtNt
                    •2-OICHLORCPROPANE
                    ,3-OICHLOfiOPROPYLtNE
                   ETHYLBtHZENE
                   MEIHYLENE CMLJRIut
                   OICHLOKOOIFLUURUMETHANE
                   TETRACHLOROETHYLtNE
                   TOLUENE
                   TRICHLOROETHYLENL
                              PENTACHLOKCiPriENOL
                              PHENUL

                              1.2-DICHLOR03ENZEHE
                              1,3-DICHLUROBENZENL
                              H-OKMLUHOuEHZbNE
                              FLJORANTHENl
                              NAPHTHALENE
          POLLUTANTS NOT LISTLD JERE NEVER OEIhtlEO
          L-LESS THAN!    N-U  NOT DETECTED!
           ACID EXTRACT
BASE-NEUTRALS
UIJITS
KI-/L
•10 /L
HG/L
IIG/L
UG/L
l!b/L
Ht/L
^L/L
HG/L
Mt/L
HG/L
KG/L
HG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/l
UL-/L
L.G/L
UG/L
UG/l
tO/L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
LG/L
UL/L
CG/L
UG/L
UG/L
Ul/L
UG/L
LG/L
INILUfllT













L


L


L
L


L



L


L
L
L

If.
135
320
41
55
Uli
7ie
j
32V
225
1U5
13
c5
1
5
49
1
«i
5
2
5
5
22
36
5
15
15
17
27
15
3
11
11
5
U






L





I
I

t
L


L
L
L

L



L
L
L
L
L
L
L
StCl'IOAKY PCtl! CDMPlNED
EFHUENT KIM. bLUOGt
13
11
"*
0
f)4 >
•33 1
1
234
271
1*
H
'*
5
5
7
5
5
1
>
5
5
5
23
5
3
1
*
251
jth)
11
11
11
U
11
33 27'ib4
"7 35057
70 520U1
7H 7933
J5 1133
2 41246
*26i:
t.7 670
14 27934
2243
l>7 22103
257
b3 9050
V5
b
dh H-D
352
it
JO 7
1517
N-U
(J.-D
n 2100
3t B
32
10 1
•13 4615
76 2
1000
173
233
35
2b
143
Ib3
MEftT
TREATED
SLUPOE
26 >l J
5 7 Ji2
960^
3512
34 >23
9'j7fc
34i
23131
7551
15217
51->
U433
507
1
M-3
M-i>
tl-'J
N-0
2H3
b
55
4fc>
1
11-11
15
2343
7
N-U
1717
50
N-n
10
li
lu















L
I
L
L

L
L


L
L

L
I


L
L
L

ME/11
IKLAlMtl.T
UlC UN 1
2 3 7*7 *
20110
53J
4122
1 'i 1 1 1
1 12 M
33
11 4 Jt
9IJ61
lbI5
433
(>7b7
it,
0
5
5
i
3
t
'j
5
13
3a
^
5
03
5
250
907
17
100
1OG
50
2
           PRELIMINARY  DATA ONLY-  TO BE VERIFIED

-------
                                                                           OF ANALYTICAL  OAlA

                                                                            PL Aid    7
              FRACTION

              BASE-NEUTRALS
C/I
Co   .3
HEULS
                    PArfAHLTEK

                    blS(2-ElHYLHLXrL)  f-MlMALAU
                    dill If L bCUm HHIHALAlt
                    01-N-bUlYL HlllHALiU
                    OltTHYL ClllhALAU
CHRYSENE
ANrilkACLNL
PHEHtNIHrtll.l
PYRENE

HEPIACHLOK
IIEPIACHLOR  LHuXIUL
CAHHA-bllC
UELIA-tHC

AhllHONY
ASSCN1C
atliYLLIUH
CADMIUM
                                  CYANIDE
                                  LEAO
                                  HEKCUHY
                                  NICKEL
                                  SILVER
                                  IUALL1UH
                                  I INC

                                  ALUMINUM
                                  AAKIUH
NUN-CCNV. HE I XLS
                                  CALCIUM
                                  COUALI
                                  IKOU
                                  rtAGHt SUM
                                  MANuANC SL
                                  MJLYUUEUUM

             I'UILUIANIj NUT IISIEO  rftKE NEVLR utllL
             I -LESS lilAhi     N-0  NJT OEIELTlUi

             CKILIHINARY DATA  ONLY- TO 1IE VER1FIEI)
Oil ITS
UC/L
LC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
NC/L
NC/L
liC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UL/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
NC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
L.C/L
UC/L
CC/L
UC/L
UC/L
MC/L
UC/L
UC/L
MC/L
UC/t
U,/L
INILUihT
217
7
3
7
L 5
L 5
L 11
L 11
L 5
417
b3
SCO
U3
6
L 3
0
5

223
42
72
loco
345
I 3
5
L 25
61V
164
t>4
J5 >l
74
11
3463
20
62
17


L
L
E
L
L
L
L
L
I


L

L








L

I










SECONDARY f'CNT
Ef-l-LUENT <•)
11
11
11
5
5
11
11
5
1000
83
iOO
1000
3 ?0
3
3
i,
52 L'2
39 J3
24 4)
4J 35
1JOC
325 a
3
1 •».>
25
lOd 33
J7 ul
23 13
/!»»
72 3
10 9
40 / 1)6
IS 5
60 3
I'j 12
COMBINED
SLUOCE
11257
1162
31C
N-D
153
153
t-7
l>27
160
L 1000
L 1000
L 1000
L 1000
1403
332
L 10
*99
72667
45633
2503
44167
2050CO
27333
lij
111
I 10
12b333
NUl KUN
KOI KUN
KOI kUN
NUT KUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
f.OI KUN
I.UT KUN
U3I KUI4
HEAT
TREATED
SLUDGE
IU117
731. I
2oS L
N-D L
25 L
25 L
iu7 L
407 L
14 L
L 1000
I 1060
I 1030
L 1COO L
1C4I
207
I 10
31 J
rj<, >OC
35333
27H
6133
140500
2ou67
S3
Ib5
t lu
9fcli33
NUl HUM
UUI KUU
KCT KJN
NOT KUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
hOI KUN
Nbl Kbit
NiJI KLjl,
HEAT
IrfcAIMLNT
DECANI
HID
100
100
100
50
50
IvIJ
100
50
333
63
167
1000
54
56
1
139
956f<
5701
49
171U
1000
9330
l>
t 7
52
32602
15523
935
1005
3ob
190
<. 601-1
10
1104
154

-------
                                                             5UMIIARY OF ANALYTICAL OAtA

                                                                      PLANT    I
         FRACTION

         NON-CONV. HLIALS
PARAHETEK

SODIUM
UN
TITANIUM
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
UN I T S
          INUUtUT
                       SELLHUARY
                       EFFLUtNT
           I>CWT
           '(EM.
COMUINEO
SLUOCE
HEAT
TREATED
SLUM3E
 lit* I
ISEATMtNT
UECANl
Mi./L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
                                                                         131
                                                                         23
                                                                         7
13J
13
t
                                                                                                  '(3
It'JT KUIt
NUT MJti
NUT KUN
NOT KUN
NOT RUN
NCT KUN
NOT HL'J
NOT KUN
NUT F:UN
NOT RUN
.'91
171
                                                                                                                                    1U
00
       POLLUTANTS NUT LISTED MERE NEVER JEIECTLD
       L-LESS THANI     N-D  NOT DETECTtDk

       PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY- TO BE VERIFIED

-------
                                                          MASS  BALANCE  IN  LBS.  PER  DAT

                                                                    PLANT    7
              FRACTION

              CONUENTIONAL8




              NON-CONVENTIONAL8
              UOLATILE8
ci
A
10
us
              ACID EXTRACT
              BASE-NEUTRALS
                jl 1C IlitS
                           PARAMETER

                           BOD
                           TOTAL  SUSP.  SOLIDS
                           COD
                           OIL  I  GREASE

                           TOTAL  PHENOLS
                           TOTAL  SOLIDS
                           TOTAL  DISS.  SOLIDS
                           TOTAL  VOLAIILE SOLIDS
                           VOLATILE  DISS. SOLIDS
                           TOTAL  VOL.  BUS.  SOLIDS
                           AMMONIA NITROGEN
                           TOC
BENZENE
CHLOROBENZEME
 >IfI-TRICHLOROETHANE
 fI-OICHLOROETHANE
 • If 2t2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
CHLOROFORM
 .2-TRANS-DICHLOROETHYLENE
 >2-DICHLOROPROPANE
 .3-DICHLORQPROPYLENE
ETHYLBENZENE
HETIirLENE CHLORIDE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE

PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENOL

I>2-DICHLOROBENZENE
I>3-DICHLOROBENZENE
I.4-OICHLOROBEMZENE
FLUORANTHENE
NAPHTHALENE
BIS<2-ETHYLHEXYL> PHTHALATE
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
I.2-BENZANTHRACENE
CIIRYSENE
ANTHRACENE
PIIENANTHKENE
PYRENE

HEI-TACHI OK
HEPTACHLOR tPOX I HE
INFLUENT
46330
34318
132922
14394
22.3
348970
290474
133327
91021
42304
3040
24180
.3
N-D
19.7
.3
N-D
1.9
.8
N-D
N-D
8.8
14.3
N-D
4.2
4.2
4.9
N-D
3.9
1.4
N-D
N-D
N-D
3.4
87.7
2.7
1 .0
2.7
N-D
N-D
N-Ii
N-D
N-D
.2
L 0.1
TOTAL OUT
124447
151127
252939
34532
7.9
310270
351219
228744
117814
94192
4473
44733
,4
L 0.1
2.7
1.4
. 1
.3
7.4
N-D
N-D
8.4
9.4
.1
1.3
19.3
l.S
4.1
,7
1.0
.1
.1
.4
.7
82.3
4.8
1 .3
N-D
.4
.4
3.4
3.4
.7
N-D
L 0. I
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
11377
7140
39080
3747
3.2
340879
333718
114028
108407
3420
3420
9349
N-D
N-D
2.7
N-D
N-D
.3
1.2
N-D
N-D
N-D
9.4
N-D
1.3
.3
1.3
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
34.1
N-P
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
I O.I
COMBINED
SLUDOE
112870
143947
213879
32783
4.7
149391
17301
114718
9209
90772
1033
37144
.4
L 0.1
N-D
1.4
.1
L 0.1
4.2
N-D
N-D
8.4
t 0.1
.1
L O.I
19.0
L 0.1
4.1
.7
1.0
.1
.1
.4
.7
44.2
4.8
1.3
N-D
.4
.4
3,4
3.4
.7
N-D
N-D
             MtAl  TREATED SI IJDGE IS NOT INCLUDED  IN  TOTAL  OUT  COLUMN
             IOILUIANIS NOT LISTED UERE NOT  DETECTED
             I  LESS THAN)  N-D  NOT DETECTED!
             TKELIH1NARY DATA ONLY	TO BE VERIFIED
                                                                                                                          HEAT
                                                                                                                          TREATED
                                                                                                                          SLUDOE
                                                                                         43838
                                                                                         96499
                                                                                         16007

                                                                                            3.9
                                                                                         380M
                                                                                         15958
                                                                                         38337
                                                                                         12430
                                                                                         23331
                                                                                         639
                                                                                         14030
L





I
I
L

L

L


L

L
L
L




L
L


I
0.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
.3
O.I
0.1
0
• D
O.I
N-D
O.I
3.9
O.I
N-D
2.9
O.I
N-D
0.1
O.I
0.1
14.9
1.2
.4
N-D
O.I
O.I
.7
.7
O.I
                                                                                                                              N-D
                                                                                                                              N-D

-------
                                                   MASS BALANCE  IN LB8. PER DAY

                                                             PLANT    7
        FRACTION

        PESTICIDES


        METALS
        NON-CONV, HETAL8
o
o
PARAMETER

GAMMA-BHC
DELTA-BHC

ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
ZINC

ALUMINUM
BARIUM
BORON
CALCIUM
COBALT
IRON
HA8NE8IUN
HANOANE8E
MOLYBDENUM
SODIUM
TIN
TITANIUM
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
INFLUENT
.2
L 0.1
2.6
N-D
L 0.1
2.0
117
90.1
14.8
20.9
.4
139
N-D
2.1
2 SO
iee
33.9
307
29891
4.3
1402
8O29
24.9
4.7
32944
9.2
2.7
57. 3
1.3
TOTAL OUT
.2
N-D
6.9
1.4
1.0
4.1
319
204
20.0
200
1.2
242
.4
1.0
870
_
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
.2
N-D
1.1
N-D
1.0
2.1
20.7
1S.S
9.7
18.7
.4
130
N-D
.3
43.3
34.9
9.2
314
28773
4.1
144
7429
24.1
4.0
52129
3.3
1.4
33.0
1.1
COMBINED
SLUDGE
N-D
N-D
S.8
1.4
N-D
2.0
298
188
10.3
181
.8
112
.4
.7
327
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
HEAT
TREATED
SLUDGE

   N-P
   N-D
    .3
   N-D
    .5
  93 i 3
  SB-,?
    .5
  10.2
    .2
  34.4
    .2
    .3
145

NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
       HEAT TREATED SLUDGE IS NOT INCLUDED IN TOTAL OUT COLUMN
       POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED
       L-LESS TMANI  N-D  NOT DETECTED*
       PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY	TO BE VERIFIED

-------
                                                MASS BALANCE IN US. ft* DAI
                                                THROUGH HEAT TREATMENT SYSTEM

                                                          PLANT   7
              FRACTION

              CONVENTIONALB




              NON-CONVENTIONAL8
              VOLATILEB
C/I
rj
A
              ACIO EXTRACT


              BASE-NEUTRALB
              PESTICIDES
PARAMETER

BOD
TOTAL SUSP. SOLIDS
COD
OIL I GREASE

TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS
TOTAL DIS8. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDS
VOLATILE DIES. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOL. SUB. SOLIDS
AHHONIA NITROGEN
TOC
BENZENE
CHLOROBENZENE
 r1-DICHLORGETHANE
 .1.2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
 HLOROFORH
 f2-TRANB-DICHLOROETHYL£NE
 > 2-DICHLOROPROPANE
 , 3-DICHLOROPROPYLENE
EIHYLBENZENE
HCTHYLENE CHLORIDE
DICHLORODIFLUOROHETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE

PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENOL
I>2-DICHLOROBENZENE
I>J-OICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
FLUORANTHENE
NAPHTHALENE
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL> PHTHALATE
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATC
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
1.2-BENZANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE
ANTHRACENE
PHENAN1HRENE
PYRENE

HEPTACHLUR
liter AC HI OK tPOX IDE
GAMMA-bHC
COMBINED
SLUDGE
112870
143947
213879
32783
4.7
149391
17301
114718
9209
90772
1033
3714*

1 0.
1.
f
I 0.
4.
M-
N-
e.
L 0.

L 0.
19.0
L 0.1
4.1
.7
1.0
.1
.1
.4
.7
46.2
4.B
1.3
.4
.4
3.4
3.4
.7
N-D
N-D
N-D
TOTAL OUT
43142
44929
118109
14380
10.3
73182
28033
30891
23246
27087
1324
23470
.8
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
.9
1 0.1
I 0.1
.8
t O.I
N-D
t 0.1
4.0
L 0.1
N-D
3.9
.1
N-D
L O.I
L 0.1
L 0.1
18.3
1.2
.4
I 0.1
1 O.I
.7
.7
I O.I
L 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
HEAT
TREATED
SLUDGE
48334
43838
94499
14007
3.9
38014
13938
38337
12430
23331
839
14030
.0
I 0.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
,3
L 0.1
L 0.1
.a
L 0.1
N-D
L O.I
3.9
t 0.1
N-D
2.9
L 0.1
N-D
L 0.1
1 O.I
1 0.1
14.9
1.2
.4
I 0.1
I O.I
.7
.7
L O.I
N-D
N-D
N-D
HEAT
TREATMENT
DECANT
IS004
3091
21410
573
4.4
13148
12077
12334
10418
1734
443
9420
L 0.1
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
1.0
L O.I
N-D
N-0
N-D
L 0.1
1 .4
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
L O.I
L 0.1
I 0.1
             POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED UERE NOT DETECTED
             L-IES8 THAN*  N-D  NOT DETECTED*
             PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY	TO b£ VERIFIED

-------
                                                   MASS  BALANCE  IN LBS. PER DAY
                                                   THROUGH HEAT  TREATMENT SYSTEM

                                                            PLANT   7
                FRACTION
                METALS
                NON-CONV. HETALS
;•   cc
    A
PARAMETER

ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
THALLIUM
ZINC

ALUMIHUH
BARIUM
BORON
CALCIUM
COBALT
IRON
MAGNESIUM
HANOANESE
MOLYBDENUM
SODIUM
TIN
TITANIUM
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
COMBINED
SLUDGE
3.8
1.4
N-D
2.0
298
189
10.3
>B1
.8
112
.6
,7
M-D
527
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
TOTAL OUT
1.8
.4
L 0.1
,4
103
45.0
.6
12.0
.2
43.0
.2
.3
L 0.1
200
_
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
HEAT
TREATED
SLUDGE
t .7
.3
N-D
.3
93.3
38.?
.3
10.2
.2
34.4
.2
.3
N-D
145
NOT-RUN
NOT-RUN
NOT-RUN
NOT-RUN
NOT-RUN
NOT-RUN
NOT-RUN
HOT-RUN
NOT-RUN
NOT-RUN
NOT-RUN
NOT-RUN
NOT-RUN
NOT-RUN
HEAT
TREATMENT
DECANT
L 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
.1
10.3
4,1
L 0.1
1.8
L 0.1
10.4
L 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
33.0
14.7
1.0
1.1
331
.2
49.3
73.2
1.2
.2
174
.4
.2
.7
L 0.1
               POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED
               L-LESS THANI  N-D  NOT DETECTED!
               PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY	TO BE VERIFIED

-------
                          PERCENT  OCCURRENCE OF POLLUTANT  PARAMETERS

                                            PLANT   7
  PARAMETER

 1.1.1  TRICHLOROETHANE
 t IHYLBENZENE
 HETHYLENE  CHLORIDE
 TEIRACHLOROETHYLENE
 TOI DENE
 NAPHTHALENE
 BIS<2-ETHYLHEXYL> PHTHALATE
 GAMMA-BHC
 CHROMIUM
 COPPER
 CYANIDE
 MERCURY
 ZINC
 CHLOROFORM
 1 . 2-TRAN8-DICt
33 < 6)
33 ( At
17 ( 4>
17 < 4)
17 < 4)
17 ( At
0 ( At
0 (A)
0 < At
0 t At
0 < At
0 < At
0 ( At
0 t At
0 (At
0 < At
0 (6)
0 (At
0 ( At
0 < At
0 (At
0 I At
0 (At

SECONDARY
EFFL
100 At
0 At
100 6t
83 At
33 At
0 At
100 At
100 At
100 At
63 At
83 At
100 At
100 At
SO At
A7 At
tOO At
0 At
0 At
63 At
03 At
33
A7
0
0
0
0
0
33
0
17
0
33
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
0 ( At

COMB.
SLDO
0 < At
83 < A)
too
17
100
33
100
0
too
100
100
100
100
t?
100
33
30
0
100
100
100
too
100
33
0
100
too
too
too
0
0
0
17
30
0
0
17
17
17
17
63
63
63
too
100
At
At
it
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
3)
At
At
At
I At
I At
At
I At
At
At
( At
63 < At
100 ( A)
100 < At
0 (At
HEAT
TREATED
SLUDGE
0 ( 4>
83 ( At
SO ( At
47 ( At
100 < At
17 < At
100 < 4>
0 < 4)
100 ( At
100 ( 4)
t OO < A t
100 4 At
100 < At
0 4 At
100 (At
SO ( 4)
83 < 4>
0 ( 4)
100 < At
100 < At
100 t At
100 < 4)
100 t At
17 ( 4)
0 < At
0 < 4)
63
too
63
0
0
0
17
0
60
17
0
0
0
17
17
17
17
100
100
17
100
100
4>
4)
4>
4>
4)
4)
At
S>
3)
At
At
At
At
1 4)
4)
At
At
At
( At
At
At
At
0 ( 4)


DECANT
0
too
33
0
100
17
too
33
too
too
too
63
too
0
too
0
100
A7
too
100
too
too
too
33
o
0
0
100
0
17
0
A7
n
0
Q
0
Q
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
A)
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
100 < 4)
100 ( At

-------
                                              SUMHAHY OF ANALYTICAL OAIA
                                                       I'LAM
FRACTION   PARAMETER

CONV.      800
           TOTAL SUSP. SOLIDS
           COO
           OIL C CREASE

NUN-CONV.  TOTAL PHENOLS
           TOTAL SOLIDS
           TOTAL OISS. SOLIDS
           SETTLEABLE SOLIDS
           TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDS
           VOLATILE OISS. SOLIOS
           TOTAL VOL. SUS. SOLIOS
           AMMONIA NITROGEN
           TUC

VOLATILES  ACRYLONITR1LE
           BENZENE
           CHLOROUEHZENE
           1>1 ,1-TRICHLUROtTHANE
           1,1-OICHLOROETHANE
           1,1,2-IRICHLORUETHANE
           l,1.2,2-TETi«CHLORUETHANE
           CHLOROETHANE
           CHLOROFORM
           1,1-OICHLOROETMYLENE
           I,2-TRANS-OICHLOROUHYLtNE
           1,2-OlCHLOkOPROPANl
           ETHYLBENZENE
           HETHYLENE CHLORIDE
           METHYL CHLORIDE
           METHYL BROMIDE
           OICMLORUDIFLUOROMETHAIIE
           TbTKACHLOROETHYLENE
           TOLUENE
           TRICHLUROETHTLENE
           VINYL CHLORIDE

ACIOS.     2,4-DICHLOR'JPHCNOL
           PCNIACHLUROPHENOL
           PHENOL

POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED MERE NEVER DETECTED
L-LESS THANI    N-0  NOT DETECTEm
PRELIMINARY PATA ONLY- TO BE VERIFIED
UN 1 T S
MC/L
MG/L
Mt/L
HC/L
UC/L
MG/L
MC/L
ML/L
Ml/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UL/L
UL/L
UC/L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
Uo/L
UC/l


L

I


L
L
I

t
I



I
L
L



I



INFLUENT
23b
i.05
5*4
US
7i
•Jib
723
4
453
3C9
144
Ifc
nt
IV
2
I
33
I
2
1
15
B
I
2
1
ie
J4
34
6
31
:«.
22V
3C
33
0
Ifc
9


L

L
L
L
L
L
I

L
L
L


L
L
L



I



SfcCOI.DAKY PCIH TMMARY
tHLULM KEM. SLUUGE
33
25
1&
5
5
t
3
5
2000
5
5
1259
2
>5->
5
5
5
VM
J
7635
5
250
N-D
823
610
55833
1B9IUO
293667
12375
7150
I94996
7553
Vti)
109432
5/33
102933
709
17333
165
773
33
13
I 1
I 5
li
L 5
L 5
5
eo3
3
l<6b
L 5
125
5
Ib93
2vJ
41575
105
L 5
N-0
1300
U3d


I


L
L
I
L
I
L
L
L
L


I
I
I
L


L



HEAT
TREATMENT
DECANT
9i7U
273
16333
31.
3200
10590
10317
1
£942
0774
172
900
f>767
19
«:2
1
J
1
2
1
15
1
1
2
1
7
19
34
6
30
2
1R25
2
33

6!)
334

-------
H>   S
             IMACIIUN   PAKAMLICK

             bAiL-NtUI.  AtLNAHllllltNt
                         HLXtCMLQKObENlLNL
                         2-CilLDKU;uPHniALEtiL
                         I .2-OICHLOKUi)EN2CllL
                         1 ,i-01CHLOKObtia£HL
                         I ,4-OICMLURUbtNJENL
                         fLUUKANflltNt
                         tltXACIItJkObUrAOItrlt
                         NAPIIIHALLNt
                         ClS<<-LT!irLl!tX»L I PHIHALAR
                         UUTYL DtrUTL  PHlMALAll
                         OI-N-bUIYL PHIHALA1L
                         OltrtUL PIIIHALAlE
                         OIHEIMYL PHIHALAU
                         1 ,2-ULN/ANlMKACtNE
             HtlALi
CMRYSENE
ANlllKACtNt
PIltNANlHKLNc
PVRENL

ANIIMUNY
ARSENIC
btKVLLIUM
CAUH1UM
ClIKOHlUh
CUPPC4
ClTAIIlOt
LtAU
HLHCUKY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILYLP
ZINC
             N-C HLIALS ALUHII.UH
                         LAMIUM
                         CALCIUM
                         IKON
                         MACNLSIUH
SUM
UMI i
UC/L
uC/L
Uu/L
UL/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
Ut/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
01 /L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
MC/l
UC/L
MC/L
hif
L
L
L
L
L


I





L
L
L
L


L
L
L
L
L






t







Y Gf At.AI
PLAN1
INFLUIM
»t
<,
j
4
2
1
1
t
It
^3
ic
2
2
t
3
25
3
2
2
3
5C
5C
2.
2
2tt
337
11

J50
417
M.
I;
17tt
li'/t
1J9
t>4
Isco
i;.
LYl
I
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L



L
I
L
I
L
L
L
L
I
I
L
I




L









1CAL LilA
t
StCUI.uAKY
Iff LULlll
10
9
3

2
2
3

t
7

,
<,
t
j
^5
3

3
i
to
50
3
2
tt>
101.

6'j

92













67
68
64
74
43
45

92
71
(.3
66

t /

SLUUGE
N-i)
N-J
l.-u
N-U
N-U
(,-0
t)l7
r.-j
Ic33
17COO
34667
IOC 7
N-3
J17
433
N-u
433
550
£50
'A3
1277
1033
33
470
Ild667
14C667
i'7t 7
C5667
2COOOO
71003
t'33
»l 7
913333
K-U
K-t)
K-D
K-Ll
l.-l.
iLUuCL
1150
195
4 JO
230
475
325
oOO
6 75
1159
io?oo
1 7775
1045
^4-0
liu
7io
N-0
750
1505
1565
734
U15
695
22
*50
101250
120500
3340
93750
I725CO
oOOJO
17o
160
715000
N-0
N-U
14-0
n-0
N-U
lit A I
1KEATLU
SLUDCt
N-U
N-C
N-0
I.-U
N-J
N-0
577
N-u
fcb6
<.U200
33425
16i>6
N-0
N-u
I lrl
11
119
(.90
(.90
7c6
Itt25
1463
44
760
1'juODO
iU25uJ
1526
95250
105000
9200J
J2i
leu
1 jJt».00
N-D
N-0
N-D
N-'J
N-U

I
I
L
L
L
L
L
L


L
L
L
I
L
L
I
L
L
I
L
L
L
L






I
I






HEAT
TREATMENT
DECANT
10
9
'
-
2
2
3
b
2
b
3
3
4
L
'i
25
3
3
3
3
iuO
500
2
2
1155
212
44
192
225
6945
500
2
7495
1323
373
lie
1'MuC
Jj
                         NUI  L1SILO HtKt  NtVtK .iL
             L-LtSS  IMANI     (1-0  HOI  OLICCHUj
                          [IATA  ONLY-  TO HE VEKIFIE1I

-------
                                                           SUHM*KY UF  ANALYTICAL  (JAIA

                                                                    PLAM    f
            FRACTION   PARAMETER
            — —---k-_   •»-»-•-»_»

            N-C METALS HANGANESt
                       SODIUM
UNITS   INFLUENT   EFFLUENT
                             PCNT
                             RtM.
Ot/L
MO/L
1VO
lin
                   152
                   139
PklMARY
SLUDGE

H-U
N-D
SLUOGL

N-0
J-D
 lit A I
TKtAltl/
SLUOGt

N-D
K-C
                                                           MEAT
                                                           TREATMENT
                                                           DECANT
                                                                                                                           97
A:
          POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED MERE NEVER OETECTtb
          L-LESS THAN;    N-O  NOT DETECTED:
          F-RELIMINARY DATA  ONLY-  TO SE VERIFIED

-------
                                                         MASS  BALANCE  IN LB8. PER DAY

                                                                    PLANT    B
              ENACTION
              CONVEMT10NAL8
              NON-CONVENTIONALB
              VOLATILES
CD
CO
A
              ACID EXTRACT
              BASE-NEUTRALS
PARAMETER

BOD
TOTAL SUSP. SOLIDS
COD
OIL I GREASE

TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS
TOTAL DIS8. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDS
VOLATILE DIBS. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOL. SU8. 80LID8
AMMONIA NITROGEN
TOC

ACRYLONITRILE
BENZENE '
CHLOMOBEN2ENE
111 »I-IRICHLOROETHANE
I.I-DICHLOROETHANE
If1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
I.1.2i2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
CHLOROFORM
1.1-DICHLOROETHYLENE
I.2-TRAN8-DICHLOROETHYLENE
1.2-01CHLOROPROPANE
ETHYLBENZENE
HETHYLENE CHLORIDE
METHYL  BRONIDE
DICIILORODIFLUOROME THANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOftOETHYLENE
VINYL CHLORIDE

2•4-01CHLOROPHENOL
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENOL

ACENAPHTHENE
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
2-CHLORONAPHTIIAI ENE
lr2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1.3-OICHLOROBENZENE
1> 4-DICHLOROBENZENE
FLUORANTHENE
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
NAPHTHALENE
BI8(2-ETHYtHEXYl ) PHTHALATE
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
INFLUENT
43008
38802
103092
21841
13. A
173863
137061
63732
38463
27289
2937
22331
N-D
.3
N-D
6.2
.2
N-D
N-B
N-D
1.3
N-D
N-D
.2
2. B
2.6
N-B
N-D
4.9
43.3
S.6
N-D
L O.I
3.3
1.6
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
.2
N-D
2.3
6.3
9.3
.3
TOTAL OUT
4B64V
I2B209
217413
39368
6.0
247*81
133206
141028
34300
82138
4818
30302
I O.I
1.4
N-D
N-D
L O.I
t 0.1
N-D
3.0
2.1
N-D
1.9
I 0.1
.8
1.3
N-D
.7
L 0.1
66.0
I O.I
.4
I O.I
4.4
1.0
1.7
.3
.6
.4
.7
.3
.9
1 .0
1 .7
17.0
27.5
2.3
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
7843
13123
39984
2338
2.4
141373
128249
60737
30788
9949
3838
9760
N-D
1.4
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
2.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
.3
1.3
N-D
N-D
L O.I
34.6
L 0.1
N-0
L 0.1
3.2
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-0
N-D
N-D
1.3
.8
.7
COMBINED
SLUDGE
40784
113086
177429
34810
3.4
124408
4957
80291
3312
72189
980
20742
L 0.1
L O.I
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
L O.I
N-D
3.0
N-D
N-D
1.9
L O.I
.3
N-D
N-D
.7
L 0.1
11.4
L O.I
.4
N-D
1.2
.9
1.7
.3
.4
.4
.7
.3
.9
1 .0
1.7
13.7
24.7
1 .4
                                                                                                                          PR I MART
                                                                                                                          SLUDGE
24490
80748
37833

   1 .4
87093
4843
33783
2949
49918
130
10746
   0.1
   0.1
   O.I
   O.I
    .1
   N-D
   0.1
   M-D
   O.I
   O.I
   1.0
   0.1
    .4
   N-D
   O.I
   1.1
   0.1
   s.a
   0.1
   N-D

   N-D
   1.7
    .6

   M-D
   N-D
   N-D
   N-D
   N-D
   N-D
     .4
   N-D
   1 .4
   12.7
   26.0
     .8
             PRIMARY SLUDGE IS NOT INCLUDED  IN  TOTAL  OUT  COLUMN
             POUUTAMTS NOT LISTED WERE NOT  DETECTED
             I-LESS THAN!  N-D  NOT DETECTED!
             PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY	TO BE VERIFIED

-------
                                                   HAB8 BALANCE  IN  LBS. PER  DAY

                                                             PLANT    8
        FRACTION

        BASE-NEUTRALS
        METALS
        NON-CONV. METALS
2
s
PARAMETER

DIETHYL PHTHALATE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
IrZ-BENZANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE
ANTHRACENE
PHENANTHRENE
PYRENE

ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
ZINC

ALUMINUM
BARIUM
CALCIUM
IRON
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
SODIUM
INFLUENT
.4
N-D
tf-D
N-0
.3
.3
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-»
48.3
63.9
2.1
42.4
L 0.1
80.9
M-D
2.5
324
242
102
10184
1033
274B
3S.9
24484
TOTAL OUT
M-D
,2
1.1
1.1
2.3
2.3
1.1
t.S
1.0
L 0.1
.7
148
202
9.4
144
.3
133
3.2
.4
1147
87.9
33.1
11134
344
2748
28.8
24294
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
N-D
M-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
M-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
14.0
20.3
.8
14.0
N-D
44.4
4.9
,2
94.7
89.9
33.1
11134
344
2748
28. B
24294
COMBINED
SLUDGE
N-D
.2
1.1
I .1
2.3
2.3
1.1
1.3
1.0
L 0.1
.7
132
181
4.4
14B
.3
90.0
.3
.2
1072
N-b
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
PRIMARY
SLUPOE

   N-D
    .2
    .3
    .3
    .4
    .4
    .7

   1,0
    .B
L  0.1
    .4
  89.0
103
   2.1
  49.2
    .2
  33.2
    .2
    .1
4BS

   N-D
   N-D
   N-D
   N-D
   M-D
   N-D
   N-D
       PRIMARY SLUDGE IB NOT INCLUDED IN TOTAL OUT COLUMN
       POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED HERE NOT DETECTED
       L-LE8S THAN*  N-D  NOT DETECTED*
       PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY	TO BE VERIFIED

-------
                                             PERCENT  OCCURRENCE  OF POLLUTANT PARAMETERS

                                                                PLANT  B
CT;
• i
Wl
A
   PARAMETER

  1.1. I  IRILII1 OROEIIIANE
  1.1  DICIIIOROETUANE
  Clll OROFOKM
  1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE
  E Mm BENZENE
  nCIHYLENE CHLORIDE
  U IRACHLOKOETHYLENE
  TOLUENE
  TRICHLOROETHYLENE
  PHENOL
  NAPHTHALENE
  BUTYL  BENZYL PHTHALATE
  CHROMIUM
  COPPER
  CYANIDE
  I I (ill
  MERCURY
  NICKEL
  SILVER
  Z INC
  BENZENE
  PENTACHl OROPHENOL
  UIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL> PHTHALATE
  DI  N-DIITYL  PHTHALATE
  DIETHYL PIUHAIATE
  2, 4-DICHLOROPIIENOL
  I.4-DICHLOROBENZENE
  H UOK'ANTHENE
  AN1IIRACENE
  PHENANTHRENE
  ACRYLONIIRILE
  LHLORODENZENE
  1,1.2-TRICHLOROETHANE
  1.1.2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
  CHLOKOETHANE
  1 , 1-DlCmORQETHYLENE
  I,2  TRANS DICHI OROETHYLENE
  METHYL CHLORIDE
  METHYL BROMIDE
  KJCHl OKOtdf LUOROME IHANE
  VINYL  CIUORIDE
  ACENAPIITHENE
  HEXACHI ORObENZENE
  1'  Clll ORONAPH1HALENE
  I ,1'  DICHIOR06ENZENE
  I . J  III CHI IlKObtNZENE
  III XACHI HKOlillTAllIEUE
  UIMLIUYI f III MAI ATE
  I .-'  DENZANTHKACENE
  IILNZO  (A)PYRENE
I  01 I UTANTS NOT  LISTED UERE NOT DETECTED
UNCONFIRMED PESTICIDES UERE ASSUMED  NOT
NUMBERS IN PARENTHESES ARE THE NUMBER OF
PKLI IMINARY DATA  ONLY'IO  BE VERIFIED

INFL-
UENT
100
100
100
100
100
too
100
100
too
100
100
100
too
too
100
100
100
too
100
100
75
75
75
SO
SO
25
25
25
23
25
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CTED
NOT
£R OF



SEC


EFFL
( 4)
( 4 »
( 4)
< 4)
< 4)
( 4>
( 4)
( 4)
< 4>
< 4)
< 4)
( 4)
< 4)
< 4(
( 4)
< 4)
( 4)
< 4)
< 4)
< 4)
1 4)
< 4)
< 4)
< 4)
( 4)
( 4)
< 4)
( 4)
( 4)
< 4)
< 4)
( 4)
( 4)
< 41
< 4>
< 4)
< 4)
( 4>
( 4)
( 4)
( 4>
< 4)
< 4)
( 4)
( 4)
( 4)
( 4)
< 4)
< 4)
( 4)
AT ANY
0
0
100
0
SO
100
23
100
23
SO
0
75
100
100
SO
100
0
100
23
100
25
100
100
75
0
25
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
< 4)
( 4)
< 4>
( 4>
< 4)
< 4)
( 4)
( 4)
< 4)
( 4)
( 4)
< 4)
< 4)
< 4)
( 4)
( 4)
< 4)
( 4)
< 4)
( 4)
C 4)
( 4)
( 4)
< 4)
< 4)
( 4)
( 4)
( 4)
< 4)
< 4>
< 4)
( 4>
( 4)
( 4)
< 4)
( 4)
( 4)
( 4)
< 4)
( 4)
( 4)
( 4)
< 4)
( 4)
< 4)
( 4)
( 4)
( 4)
( 4)
( 4)
SAMPLE

PRIM.
SLDO.
47 3)
100
33
47
100
0
100
100
47
47
100
100
too
100
100
100
100
100
100
too
47
47
100
47
0
0
0
100
47
47
33
100
0
33
0
47
100
0
33
47
0
0
0
0
o
o
0
33
33
3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
31
3)
3)
3)
3)
3k
3>
3)
3»
3)
3)
3)
3>
3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
3>
3»
3>
3>
3)
3>
3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
0 ( 3)
POINt

COMB.
SLl'G
0 (4)
2S (4)
0
100
100
0
50
100
73
73
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
75
75
100
0
Q
25
too
75
73
25
o
SO
0
73
o
100
4)
4)
4)
4>
41
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
0 < 4>
0 (4)
SO < 4>
SO (4)
23 < 4)
25 < 4)
25 < 4)
25 < 4)
25 4 >
25 4)
25 4)
SO 4)
0 4)

HEAT
TREATED
SLUDGE
25
0
0
23
100
0
100
100
100
30
73
100
too
100
100
100
100
too
100
100
100
so
100
100
0
0
0
100
75
75
75
IOO
0
75
0
23
100
25
23
too
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50
SO




< 4)
( 4)
( 4)
( 4)
( 4)
( 4)
( 4)
< 4)
< 4)
< 4)
< 4)
( 4)
( 4)
( 4)
( 4)
( 4J>
( 40
< 4)
< 4)
< 4)
< 4)
( 4)
< 4)
< 4)
< 4)
( 4)
< 4)
< 4)
( 4)
( 4>
< 4)
< 4)
41
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
< 4)
< 4)
< 4)
< 4)
< 4)
< 4)
( 41
( 4)
( 4)



DECANT
0
0
0
0
too
100
0
100
75
100
23
0
100
too
100
100
SO
too
0
too
100
too
23
0
0
so
0
0
0
0
0
30
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0




( 4)
( 4>
( 4)
( 4)
< 4)
( 4)
< 4)
( 4)
( 4)
< 4)
( 4)
< 4)
( 4)
( 4)
< 4)
< 4)
( 4)
< 4)
< 4)
< 4)
< 4)
< 4)
( 4)
(4)
< 4)
< 4)
< 4)
< 4)
( 4)
< 4)
( 4)
( 4)
< 4)
< 4)
( 4)
( 4)
( 4)
( 4>
( 4)
< 4)
( 4)
< 4)
( 4)
( 4)
< 4)
< 4)
< 4>
( 4)
( 4)
( 4)

DETECTED
SAMPLES
TAKEN







-------
                                         PERCENT OCCURRENCE  OF POLLUTANT  PARAMETERS

                                                          PLANT  B
              PARAMETER

             CMRYSENE
             PYRENE
             ANTIMONY
             ARSENIC
             BERYLLIUM
             CADMIUM
             SELENIUM
INFL-
UENT
O O-O O O O o

4)
4)
4)
41
4>
4)
4)
SEC.
EFFL
0 (
0 (
0 (
0 <
0 (
0 (
ZS (

4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
PRIM,
SLDO.
33
100
too
100
100
100
100

3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
COMB.
SLDO
SO
100
100
100
100
100
100

4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
MEAT
TREATED
SLUDOE
30
100
100
too
100
100
100

4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
DECANT
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
•8
 A
            POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED AT ANY SAMPLE POINT
            UNCONFIRMED PESTICIDES WERE ASSUMED NOT DETECTED
            NUMBERS IN PARENTHESES ARE THE NUMBER OF SAMPLES TAKEN
            PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY-ID BE VERIFIED

-------
                                                           SUMMARY
              fhAC 11 UN
              CUNVtNIIUNALS
              NUN-CONVLN110NALS
              VOLAIILES
cn
•vj
A
              AC III tXlhACI
              .)ASi.-HtlJIKALS
PARAMETER

BOO
IOIAL SUSP.  SOLIDS
COO
OIL i CREASE

TUTAL PHENOLS
JOIAL SOLIDS
IOIAL UISS.  SJLIUS
SEIILEABLE  SOLIDS
IOIAL VOLAIILi.  SuLIOS
VOLAIILE OISS.  SOLIDS
IOTAL VOL.  SOS.  SOLIDS
AMMONIA NIIROGEN
IOC

BEN/ENE
CARBON  lEIKACilLUKlOE
CHLOROBEN2ENE
l.l.l-IRlCHLOKOLMUNk
I.I-OICMLOROEIHANE
1,1,2-IRICMLOKOEIUANL
1.1.2,2-IETRACHLUKOEJHANE
CMLOROLIHANE
CHLOROFORM
1, 2-lRANS-DICIILORGf THYLENE
1.2-OICHLOKOPrfOPANE
EIHYLBENJENE
HLIMYLENE CHLJiUOL
HEIHYL CHLOKIOE
HEIHYL BROMIDE
ILIRACHLOROElMYLtNE
IOLUENE
IKICIILClKUL IHYLLNL
VINYL CIILUkll>L

PAKACHLOROMLIA  CKLSOL
4.6-0 IN IIkU-0-CKtSLL
PHENOL

lit XACHLUKUCINIENL
FLJUKANltlLUL
le ANALYTICAL DATA
PLANT 9
UNI IS INHUtNl
fcC/L
MC/L
MC/L
HC/L
UC/L
MC/L
HC/L
HL/L
HC/L
HC/L
HC/L
HC/L
HC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L














L
L
L


L

L
I



I



L

I

I
L
113

267
36
67
455
234
9
190
54
131
10
66
1
1
5
5
6

1
5
4
5
5
1
5
2
5
4
a
33
5
2
50
2
20
10






L






L

L
L

L
L

L
L

L

L


L
L
L

L
L
L
SECONDARY PCNI
EFfLUENI REH.
5
14
36
6
7
292
235
1
66
50
9
3
12
4
5
1
5
5
1
5
5
2
5
5
1
5
2
5
0
0
5
5
50
0
60
20
lu
96
91
67
a3
90
36
89
65
7
93
70
86





96


50






100
100
as






PRIMARY
SLUOCE
10666
39536
49361.
1563
657
40697
1162
NOI (
-------
                                                      SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL DATA

                                                               PLANT   9
           FRACTION

           BASE-NEUTRALS
           METALS
p-rv,
  •
GO
 A
           NUN-CONV. HLTALS
PARAMETER

BISI2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
OI-N-BUTYL PHIHALATE
OIETHYL PHTHALATE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
1,2-BENZANTHRACENE
BENZO (A)PYRENE
11,12-BENZUFLUORANTHENE
CHRYSENE
ANTHRACENE
PHENANTHRENE
PVRENE

ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
SELEN1UH
SILVER
ZINC

ALUMINUM
6ARIUH
BORON
CALCIUM
IRON
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
MOLYBDENUM
SODIUM
TIN
TITANIUM
VANADIUM
UNI IS
UC/L
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/l
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
NG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
HG/L
UG/L
MG/L
UG/L
UC/L
HG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L


L


L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L


L





L











L




INFLUENT
5
20
13
11
20
10
10
10
10
20
20
10
0
2
1
3
55
70
82
91
1000
36
2
11
160
577
115
M5
29
1505
7
16V
36
46
20
27
4

I
L


I
L
t
I
L
I
I
L


L





L













I


SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
20
20
16
2
20
10
10
10
10
20
20
10
0
2
1
Z
3
26
27
17
1000
2%
2
1
57
9B
34
m
27
372
I
91
7
46
26
6
2
PCNT
REM.



82











33
95
63
67
81

34

91
64
83
70
10
7
75

46



78
50
PRIMARY
SLUDGE
2017
767
110
7
11
11
50
10
N-0
92
92
72
40
37
1 L
257
7333
11633
30523
6200
114667
4767
47
126
25963
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT DUN
NOT RUN
NOT SUN
NUT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
N01 RUN
SECONDARY
SLUDGE
460
47
12
8
5
8
N-D
N-D
B
16
16
12
14
19
6
152
2197
39 CO
440
2250
46333
656
40
328
4800
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
I<1)1 RUN
MOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
          POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED HERE NEVER UEIECTEO
          L-LE5S  THANI    N-0  NOT DETECTED!
          PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY	TO BE VERIFIED

-------
                                                     MASS  BALANCE  IN L6S.  PER DAY

                                                                PLANT   9
            fKACFION

            CONMENTIONALS




            NUN-CONVENTIOHAL8
            VOLATILES
cr,
cc
A
PARAMETER

BOD
TOTAL 6USP. SOLIDS
COD
OIL t GREASE

TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS
TOTAL DI88. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOLATILE  SOLIDS
VOLATILE DIES.  SOLIDS
TOTAL VOL..  BUS.  SOLIDS
AMMONIA NITROGEN
TOC

BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
CHLOROBEN2ENE
ItIiI-TRICHLOROETHANE
1>1-DICHLOROETHANE
I•1> 2-TRICHLOROETHANE
I i I .2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
CHLOROFORM
If2-TRAN8-DICHLOROETHYLENE
I.2-DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYLBENZENE
METHYLENC CHLORIDE
METHYL CHLORIDE
METHYL BROMIDE
TEIRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
VINYL CHLORIDE

PARACHLOROHETA  CKE60L
4'4-DINlTRO-O-CRESOL
PHENOL

HEXACHLOROBENZENE
FL.UORANTHENE
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL> PHTHALATE
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-BUTYL  PHTHALATE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
DIMETHYL PllfHAtATE
1 • 2-BENZANTIIRACENE
BtN/0 (A)PYNEHE
II . 12-BENZOFLIJORANIIIENE
CHKY9ENE
ANIIIKACENE
PHt~NANIHfcLN£
PYRENE
           PU1IUTAN1S  NOT  LISTED UERE NOT DETECTED
           1-1 ESS  1HANI  N-D  NOT DETECTED)
           PRELIMINARY  DATA ONLY	TO BE VERIFIED
             ACID EXTRACT
             BASE-NEUTRALS
INFLUENT TOTAL
48739
15458
44221 52994
114993 68744
13318 4188
SECONDARY
OUT EFFLUENT
2014
4183
13534
2733
28.8 S.I 3-0
196238 173377 125996
100898 103979 101401
81840
23373
36382
4099
37232


43913
22044
39133
1483
17181
28479
21719
4027
1294
3034
3 1.9 1.9
4 N-D N-D
N-0 .2 .2
N-D L 0.
N-D L 0.
9.

8 .
4 10.
N-D 10.
| ,
7 .
N-D
N-D 1 0.

2,

2 .
2 10.
8 1.
N-D 7.
1.
3.
14.
7 CO.
3 4.
3 10.
N-0
N-D
.4
N-D
N-D
.7
N-D
N-D
.4
N-0
1.0
N-D
L 0.1
. 1
N-D
N-0 2.3 N-D
.8 N-D N-D
N-D
.1
.9 2.3 N-D
N-D L 0.
H-
1.
N-
3.
4.
N-
N-
N-
N
N-
N-
N-
N-
0 L O.I
N-D
N-D
9 3.4 N-D
D .3 N-D
4 4.1
t 6.0
3 .9 .9
D L 0.
D L 0.
D L 0.
D L 0.
D 1 0.
D
D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N D
N-D
N-D
D L 0.1 N-D
PRIMARY
SLUDGE
4524
14447
20341
439
.3
14950
484
12773
144
12609
43.0
4348
t 0.1
N-D
I 0.1
I 0.1
L 0.1
N-D
L 0.1
6.9
N-D
.2
L 0.1
I 0.1
1 0.1
.3
4.7
L 0.1
.7
I 0.1
2.4
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
N-D
I O.I
1.2
.3
L O.I
L 0.1
L 0.1
1 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
N-D
L 0. 1
L 0.1
L O.I
SECONDARY
SLUDOE
8918
30344
32649
794
1.8
32431
2094
22461
163
22497
148
777V
N-D
N-D
N-0
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
3.3
N-D
t 0.1
N-D
L O.I
N-D
N-D
2.4
N-D
3.6
I 0.1
t O.I
H-D
N-D
2.3
L 0.1
L 0.1
2.2
.2
L 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1

-------
                                                    MASS BALANCE IN LB8., PER PAY
                                                              PLANT
            TRACTION
            METALS
            NON-CONV. METALB
o
 A
PARAMETER

ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
NERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
ZIHC

ALUMINUM
BARIUM
BORON
CALCIUM
IRON
MAGNESIUM
NAHOAHESE
MOLYBDENUM
SODIUM
TIN
TITANIUM
VANADIUN
INFLUENT
L O.I
.7
N-D
1.4
23.7
30.1
35. 2
37.2
N-D
14.3
.6
4*7
47.0
247
47. 3
42.7
12298
447
2747
73.1
N-D
17773
8.4
11.4
t.S
TOTAL OUT
.2
1.0
L 0.1
1.7
15.1
34. B
24.3
20.4
.2
17.0
.8
1.7
SB. 3
_
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
L O.I
.7
N-D
.7
1.4
11. 1
11. 5
7.1
N-D
10.7
.4
.2
24. 3
42.4
14.4
34.4
11307
141
2977
37.3
2,7
17773
N-D
2.4
.B
PRIHARY
SLUDGE
L 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
.1
3.1
4.7
12.7
2.4
I 0.1
2.0
L 0.1
L 0.1
10. B
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
SECONDARY
SLUDGE
I 0,1
I O.I
N-D
.7
10.4
18.8
2.1
10.7
.2
4.1
.2
1.4
23.2
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
HOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
HOT RUN
           POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED HERE NOT DETECTED
           L-LESS TIIANI  N-D  HOT DETECTED!
           PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY	TO BE VERIFIED

-------
                         PERCENT  OCCURRENCE OF POLLUTANT  PARAMETERS

                                           PLANT  »
   PARAMETER

  101 UtHl
  IRICMLOROETHYLENE
  blETIIYL PHTHALATE
  CHROMIUM
  COPPER
  CYANIDE
  LEAD
  NICKEL
  SII VCR
  ZINC
  CHLOROFORM
  ARSENIC
  1 • I .2 TRICIILOROETIIANE
  TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
  PHENOL
  CADMIUM
  SELENIUM
  BI8<2-ETHYLHEXYL>  PHTHALATE
  UIM BUTYL PIITHALATE
  MEdltL CHLORIDE
  PARACHLOROHETA CRE60L
  BENZENE
  CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
  1 . 1.2.2 TETRACHLOROETHANE
  ETHYLbENZENE
  HETHYLENE CHLORIDE
  ANTIMONY
  till OkObENZENE
  I > 1 > I-TRICIIl OROETIIANE
  I. I  DirilLOROETIIANE
  CHL OROETIIANE
  I ,2-IRANS-DICIII OROETHYLENE
  I .2-DICHLOROPROPANE
  METHYL BROMIDE
  VINYL CHLORIDE
  4.4-D1NIIRO-0-CRESOL
  HLXACIH OKObLNZENE
  FLUORANTHENE
  DUTYL BENZYL PIITHALATE
  DIMETHYL PIITHALATE
  1. 2-BENZANTHRACENE
  BENZO (A)PVKENE
  11.12 -BENZOFLUORANTHENE
  CIIRYSLNE
  ANIIIRACENE
  I III NANIHKfNE
  IYKLNE
  ui KYI i urn
  HI Kl (Hi »

INFLUENT
100
too
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
too
83
83
47
47
47
47
47
50
SO
33
3]
17
17
17
17
17
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0


4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
33
0
50
33
100
100
33
100
so
100
B3
100
17
17
0
83
SO
0
33
33
0
so
0
0
17
0
17
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0


4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4>
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
PRIMARY
SLUIiQE
100
100
17
83
83
100
100
83
83
83
0
100
0
100
17
83
too
too
47
33
0
47
0
J7
100
33
100
SO
17
83
too
47
47
100
100
0
0
30
83
17
17
17
14
0
SO
SO
SO
17
100


4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
41
4)
4)
4)
4>
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
7>
S)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
SECONDARY
SLUbOE
100
47 <
17
83
83
100
100
83
83
83
0
100
0
0
83
83
too
83
17
0
0
0
0
0
SO
0
83
0
0
0
33
83
0
SO
17
0
17
17
33
17
17
0
0
17
33
33
17
0
100


4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4>
4>
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
( 4)
inilUIANIS NOT LISTED  UERE NOT DETECTED  AT ANY SAMPLE  POINT
UNCONFIRMED PESTICIDES UERE ASSUMED  NOT  DETECTED
NUMBERS  IN PARENTHESES ARE THE NUHbER  OF SAMPLES TAKEN
IKEIIHINARY DATA ONLY-TO BE VERIFIED

-------
                                                         SUtlHAKY  UF  ANALYTICAL ItAIA
                                                                 PLAM   10
                                                                UMFLl PU1NIS INLY
            FRACTION

            CONVENTIOMALS
            NON-CONVENTIONALS
            VOU TILES
T
PARAMETER

UUO
TOTAL  SUSP.  SUL10S
OIL  t  CREASl

TOTAL  PHENOLS .
TOTAL  SOLIDS
TOTAL  DISS.  SOU I OS
TOTAL  VOLATILE  SOLU'S
AMMONIA NlIKOCEM
TOC

BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDi
1,1,1-TRICHLOKOETHANE
1,1-DICHLORUETHANE
CHtOROETHANE
CHLOROFORM
1,2-OICHLOROPKOPANE
EIHYLBLNIENE
METHYLENE CHIUK IDE
METHYL CHLORIDE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
VINYL  CHLORIOt

PHENOL

1,2,1-TRICHLOKUBENZENE
1.2-D1CHLOROBENZENE
1.3-DICHLOROBEN/ENE
1,4-OICHLOROGcNlENE
NAPHTHALENE
BISI2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTIIALATE
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
OI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
OIETHYL PHTHALA1E
11,12-eEUZOFLUORAMHENE
1,12-BENZOPERYLENL
          POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED HERE NEVER DETECTED
          L-LESS THANI    N-0  NOT DETECTED)
          PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY-  TO  BE  VERIFIED
           AC10 EXTRACT

           BASE-NEUTRALS
UNITS
tiC/l
CC/L
MG/L
UO/L
HG/L
HG/L
MG/L
MG/L
HC/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UO/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
tt/l
UG/L
UG/L
UC/L
UC/L
LC/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
SECONDARY PCNI
IhFLUtM EFFLULHI KEM.
242
222
71.
6*
050
633
27V
24
1M
0
0
3
I
1
9
0
4
31
50
5
12
56
L 10
9
1
3
1
3
3
86
3
5
3
0
I 2C
tb -)3
10 13
17 77
16 75
51* J6
489 23
12U ->4
9 03
J3 M
L
L
L
L
L

L
L



L
L


67

0
89


3 35
92
20
)2
98
0
I 1 09
L 5
I 3
I 3
I 3
I 2 33
9 70
L 2 33
6
L 3
L 10
L 20




L
L
L
L
I

L
L

L

L
L
I
L
L
I
I
I
L

L


L
L
PRE CL
EFFLUENT
NOT FUN
NOT KLIN
NUT f.u:<
NUT F.UN
NOT RUN
NOT KUN
NUT KUN
NOT RUN
NOT kUH




0


6
34
10
3
1
1
10
1
f
3
3
3
2
IB
2
7
1
10
20





I
L
L
L
L

L
L

I


I
L

L
L
L
L
L

I

I
I

T. F.
EFFLUENT
23
1't
17
116
623
b9l
129
I'l
•.6
1
1
1
1
10
2
1
1
50
10
3
0
1
10
0
5
3
3
3
2
8
2
7
3
10
0

-------
               HEIALS
2!
A


                                                             .,„
                                                                                             fKE CL
                                                                    UNllS
                                                                             INKULNl
                     .  -000
                   ALPMA-bHC
                   bETA-BHC
                   GAMMA-BHC

                   CADMIUM
                   CHROMIUM
                   COPPER
                   CYANIDE
                   LEAD
                   HERCUMV
                   NICKEL
                   SILVER
                   ZINC
NON-CONV. NEIALS   ALUMINUM
                                   MANGANESE
                                   SODIUM
NC/L
M./L
NC/L
NC/L
NC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
NC/L
UC/L
UC/L
L J°
I 60
1 JO
i £, f
                                                     HC/L
                                                     UC/L
                                                     MC/L
971
40
ir
98
109
jo
oO
10
10
U

1
32
11
163
3
60
 35
 i
 73

 Ma
 19
 35.
 M
 95
 t)0
                                            T. F-
                                            EfFLUENl
....

M
*)0
US
ao
A |
» 1
91
/5
65

D5
J*
41
33
3
27
L 30
L 60 t
L JO
3
hOI KUN
NOI KUN
NOT BUM
NOT RUN
NOT »UN
NOI KUN
NOI KUN
NOI KUN
NOI KUN
»*ot t>(i»4
NOI KUN
NOI KUN
NOI KUN
NOT KUN
NOI KUN
NOT RUN
7
3b
. 10
1
J 7
• *
6
10
I J.O
1" *
"I
0
11
1
56
43
13
35
79
16
.90
96
                                   NU1 OtfECILUl
                                   -  T0 B

-------
                                                    SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL  DATA
                                                             PLANT  10
                                                    SLLDCE SAMPLE POINTS ONLY
 FRACTION

 CONVENT1UNALS



 NON-CONVENTIONALS
 VOLATILES
PARAMETER

BOO
TOTAL SUSP. SOLIDS
OIL t CREASE

TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS
TOTAL UISS. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOLATILE S3LIOS
AMMONIA NITROGEN
TOC

ACRYLONITRILfc
BENZENE
CHLOROBENZENE
l.l-UICHLOROETHANt
1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETUANE
CHLOROETHANE
CHLOROFORM
1,1-OICHLOROtTHYLENE
1.2-TRANS-OICHLURCETHYUNE
1,2-DICHLOROPKOPAKE
ETHYLBENZENE
HETHYLENE CHLURIUE
METHYL CHLORIDE
METHYL BROMIDE
OICMLOROBROMOMiTHANt
01CHLOROOIF LUURUME TIlANL
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOKOETHYLENE
VINYL CHL3K10L

PHENOL

ACENAPHIHENE
HCXACHLOROBENZENE
FLUORANTMENE
NAPHTHALENE
BISI2-ETMYLHCXYL) FHTIIALATL
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED MERE NEVER JETltHO
L-LESS THANI    N-D  NOT DETECILDI
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY	TO 8E VEMFIEX
 ACID EXTRACT

 BASE-NEUTRALS
UMTS
HC/L
MC/L
HC/L
UC/L
HC/L
nc/i
HC/L
HC/L
HC/L
UG/L
UC/L
U(./l
Ub/L
UC/L
UC/L
UO/L
UC/L
UC/L
LC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
tG/L
LC/L
UC/L
UC/L
I'C/L
UC/L
LC/L
UO/L
LC/L
Ut/L
»i(,/L
UC/L
DICtSIED
SLUDCE
6276
2BV50
290
716
18344
300
12071
70u
7570
N-0
4
4
N-n
N-0
N-0
1
N-b
866
0
119
N-0
2
N-t>
1
N-0
N-D
2524
0
11
mi
N-0
N-D
Id
51
3722
CUMBINEO PCNl
SLUDGE REM.
5556 11
J21.CO
295
473 3*
23375
HOT RUN
23178
41. n
16264
N-D
11
1 75
6
N-0
N-D
N-U
N-J
536 38
1
45 62
37
N-0
M-'J
N-0
H-0
1
3042
2
105
123 9.)
N-0
40
14-3
•4-iJ
3301)
.WASTE
ACTIVATED
SLUUCE
ta333
HOI KUM
109
715
11469
NOT RUN
BO 19
37
3694
3
1
N-D
N-0
N-D
N-0
N-0
N-0
H-0
N-D
N-0
N-D
16
121
N-0
N-0
1
701
1
N-l)
N-D
N-D
N-0
N-0
N-U
U60
SECONDARY
SLUDGE
239
555
56
41
1244
043
6tO
25
206
N-D
0
N-D
0
0
N-0
0
0
N-i)
N-0
1
1
N-D
N-0
N-0
62
19
12
10
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-0
N-0
K-\j
3':'«
T. F.
SLUDGE
NUI HUN
5500
271
430
1 1329
II tCO
9400
23
t-ni
N-D
1
N-U
N-b
N-0
150
N-0
N-U
15
N-D
1
N-0
N-0
250
N-D
N-U
N-U
2342
N-0
N-U
l.'OO
9
N-0
1)
N-U
lObO

-------
                                                                 SUMHAkY Of ANALYTICAL  DATA
                                                                          PLANT  10
                                                                 SLUbCE SAMPLE  HOINIS ONLY
              FRACI I UN

              BASE-NEUTRALS
              MtULS
•vl
01
/\
PARAMETER
BUTYL UENm PMIHALAIE
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALAIE
DIETHYL PHTHALAIE
1.2-bENZANIHKACENt
CHRYSENE
ANTHRACENE
fLUORENE
PHENANTHHENE
PYKENt.

ANUHQNY
ARSENIC
BEHYLL1UH
CADMIUM
CHHQMlUh
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
HERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
2 INC

UNITS
UL/L
L.C/L
t(,/L
tC/L
L.C/L
Ut/L
Ut/l
LC/L
CC/L
UC/L
UC/L
liu/L
UC/L
UG/L
UC/L
UC/L
LC/L
KC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L

UICCSIEO
SLUOCC
lib
ii
*3
N-l>
N-U
79
ie
79
IB
»1
U
1
87b
7017
16200
516CO
7140
^2b3J
ii!7
176
50b
45700

COHblNEO
SLUOCE
db
it
U-J
6i
o5
47
N-0
<, 1
H
I0a
27
4
143
looo
7150
69167
6150
*»bOO
3^0
2JJ
*5
21500

PCNT
REH.
16




41

SI


34

76
79
56

14
5i
t>6

91
53
MASIt
ACTIVATED
SLUDGE
110
N-D
N-0
38
36
5050
100
5050
31
10
M
4
660
6450
7950
1675
4450
34000
1J5&
111
265
16350

SECONDARY
SLUOCE
14
4
N-0
N-D
N-D
11
N-U
11
N-D,
a
2
2
24
175
S65
440
288
L 12030
2e
29
92
1903

T. f.
SLUDGE
47
50
N-0
16
16
395
N-0
395
22
20
23
4
244
2800
4400
2445
2600
16600
560
225
550
8600
            POLLUTANTS NOT  LISTED  UENE  NEVER  OEILCTED
            L-LESS  THAN!     N-0  NOT  DETECTED!
            PKLLIMINAKV DATA UHLY	TO  BE  VEKlfliU

-------
                                                   HASS BALANCE IN IBS.  PER  DAY

                                                             PLANT  10
        FRACTION
        COHVEHTIOHALS
        NON-CONVENTIONALS
        VOLATILEB
8
        ACID EXTRACT
PARAMETER

BOD
TOTAL SUSP. SOLIDS
OIL I OREA8E

TOTAL PHEHOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS
TOTAL DISB. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDS
AMMONIA NITROOEN
TOC

BEHZEHE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
CMLOROBEMZEHE
IfItl-TRICHLOROETMANE
1rI-DICHLOROETMAHE
I•112 »2-TETRACHLOROETHAHE
CHLOROETHANE
CHLOROFORM
Itl-DICHLOROETHYLENE
1.2-TRAMS-DICHLOROETHYLENE
1>2-DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYLBENZENE
HETHYLEHE CHLORIDE
METHYL CHLORIDE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHAHE
TETRACHLOROETHYLEHE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHYLEHE
VIHYL CHLORIDE

PHEHOL
        BASE-NEUTRALS      1i2i4-TRICHLORODEHZEHE
                           HEXACHLOROBEHZEHE
                           1r2-DICHLOROBEHZEHE
                           1.3-DICHLOROBEHZEHE
                           1r 4-DICHLOROBEHZEHE
                           HAPHTHALENE
                           BIB<2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
                           BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
             ,,,,'.,           DI-H-BUTYL PHTHALATE
                           DIETHYL PHTHALATE
                           112-BENZANTHRACEHE
                           11f12-BENZOFLUORAHTHEHE
                           CHRY8ENE
                           ANTHRACENE
                           It12-BENZOPERYLEHE
                           PHENAHTHREHE
                           PYRENE
       BALANCE AROUND TRICKLING FILTER PLANT ONLY
       SECONDARY SLUDGE IS NOT  INCLUDED IN TOTAL OUT COLUMN
       POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED HERE NOT DETECTED
       L-LESB THAN»  N-D  NOT DETECTEDI
       PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY—-TO BE VERIFIED
INFLUENT
13758
I2B13
4318
3.7
47071
34953
16106
1397
6 SB I
L
L


L

t



L









L


L







L





O.I
0.1
H-D
.2
0.1
N-D
O.I
.9
H-D
M-D
0.1
• a
4.6
2.9
H-D
.3
.7
3.2
N-D
.9
0.1
N-D
.2 .
0.1
.2
.1
9.0
.2
.3
.2
N-D
0.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
TOTAL OUT
2733
9753
1032
6.B
42273
12444
1120
6743
L

L

L





L
L





L
L
L

1





L


L

L
L
L
L
L
O.I
N-D
0.1
N-D
O.I
N-D
N-D
.1
N-D
.1
0.1
O.I
2.7
N-D
N-D
.2
.0
0.1
O.I
0.1
N-D
O.I
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
1.4
0.1
.4
N-D
0.1
N-D
0.1
0,1
0.1
0.1
0.1
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
1347
BOB
938
6,7
35792
34213
7424
HOB
2477
N-D
H-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N^D
N-D
.1
N-D
H-D
N-D
N-D
2.7
N-D
H-D
.2
L 0.1
H-D
N-D
I O.I
N-D
N-D
H-D
H-D
N-D
N-D
.9
N-D
.4
H-D
H-D
H-D
H-D
N-D
L 0.1
N-D
H-D
COMB I MED
8LUDOE
1388
B147
73.7
.1
6341
NOT RUN
9042
12.3
4044
L

L

L





L
L
L


L

L
L
L

L





L
L

L

L
L

L
L
0.1
N-D
0.1
H-D
0.1
M-D
H-D
H-D
N-D
.1
0.1
O.I
O.I
H-D
H-D
0.1
.8
O.I
0.1
0.1
H-D
0.1
H-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
.7
0.1
0.1
N-D
0.1
N-D
0.1
0.1
N-D
O.I
0.1
SECONDARY
SLUDGE

  2V. 9
  69.3
   7.0

L  0.1
193
105
  79.0
   3.1
  39.8
                                                                                                                     0.1
                                                                                                                     H-D
                                                                                                                     H-D
                                                                                                                     M-D
                                                                                                                     O.I
                                                                                                                     0.1
                                                                                                                     H-D
                                                                                                                     0.1
                                                                                                                     0.1
                                                                                                                     H-D
   0.1
   O.I
   H-D
   0.1
   O.I
   O.I
   0.1
   H-D

   H-D

   H-D
   H-D
   N-D
   N-D
   N-D
   N-D
   0,1
   O.I
   0.1
   H-D
   N-D
   H-D
   H-D
   O.I
   N-D
   0.1
   H-D

-------
                                             MASS BALANCE  IN LB8.  PER  PAT
                                                       PLANT   10
  FRACTION
  PESTICIDES
  METALS
  NON-CONU.  METALS
PARAMETER

DIELDRIN
4.4--DDD
BETA-BHC
OAMMA-BHC

ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
ZINC

ALUMINUM
BARIUM
CALCIUM
IRON
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
SODIUM
INFLUENT
N-D
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
M-D
N-D
N-D
.1
.*
4.2
47.5
1.9
t O.I
.2
N-D
.9
12.0
34.2
4.S
2319
41.1
1212
9.7
427J
SECONDARY COMBINED
TOTAL OUT EFFLUENT SLUDGE
I
L
I
L
L
L
I





L

L
L








0. L 0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
,
.
2 ,
27.
1 »
0.
•
0.
0.
L 0.
L 0.
L 0.
N-
N-
M-
.
.
,
9.
»
L 0.
,
N-
L 0.
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
.4
l.B
17.3
1.9
I 0.1
L O.I
L 0.1
L 0.1
a. t 3.2 *•*
2.9 NOT RUM
.8 NOT RUM
2040 MOT RUM
4.4 NOT RUN
1039 NOT RUN
9.2 NOT RUN
3342 NOT RUN
SECONDARY
8LUDOE




L
L
L
I
I
t
L
L

I
I
I
N-D
M-D
N-D
N-0
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
M-
0.
0.
0.












NOT RUN
NOT RUN
MOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUM
MOT RUM
NOf RUM
DAI ANLE AROUND  1HICMINU FILTER  PLANT  ONLY
bLCUMOAHY SLUDGE  IS NOT 1NCLUDEU IN  TOTAL OUT  COLUMN
POLLUTANTS NOT  LISTED UERE  NOT DETECTED
1-LEGS THANI  N-D  NOT DETECTED*
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY	TO  BE VERIFIED

-------
                                                     PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF POLLUTANT PARAMETERS
                                                                      PLANT 10
00
/I
     ro
   PARAMETER

  CHLOROFORM
  METMYLENE CHLORIDE
  TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
  TOLUENE
  TRICIILOROETHYLENE
  PHENOL   :
  BIS<2-ETHYLHEXYL> PHTHALATE
  BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
  COPPER
  CYANIDE
  MERCURY
  ZINC
  1fIrI-TRICHLOROETHANE
  ETHVLBENZENE
  1i4-DICHLOROBEHZENE
  OAMHA-BHC
  CHROMIUM
  SILVER
  1.1-D1CHLOROETHANE
  METHYL CHLORIDE
  NAPHTHALENE
  DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
  DIETHYL PHTHALATE
  LEAD
  1.2-DICHLOROBENZENE
  CADMIUM
  lr2.4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
  NICKEL
  BENZENE
  CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
  CHLOROETHANE
  1>2-DICHLOROPROPANE
  1>3-DICHLOROBENZENE
  11.12-BENZOFLUORANTHENE
 ACRYLONITRILE
 CHLOROBENZENE
  1>1.2.2-TETRACHLOROETHAHE
  1>1-DICHLOROETHYLENE
  1.2-TRAN8-DICHLOROETHYLENE
 METHYL BROMIDE
 BICHLOROBROHOHETHANE
 DICHLORODIFLUOROHETHANE
 VINYL  CHLORIDE
 ACENAPHTHENE
 HEXACIILOROBENZENE
 FLUORANTHENE
 1r2-8ENZANTHRACENE
 CHRY6ENE
 ANTHRACENE
 1.12-BENZOPERYLENE
 FLUORENE
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED HERE NOT DETECTED
UNCONFIRMED PESTICIDES WERE ASSUMED NOT
NUMBERS IN PARENTHESES ARE THE NUMBER OF
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY-TO BE VERIFIED
INFL-
UENT
100
100
100
100
100
too
100
100
100
too
100
100
83
83
83
83
83
83
47
47
47
47
47
47
SO
SO
33
33
17
17
17
17
17
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
PRECL
EFFL
4) 47
4> 100
4) 83
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
41 .100
4) 0
4) 0
5) , 0
4> 0
4) 0
4> 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 17
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) O
4) 100
4) 33
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
41 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
41 0
4) 0
4» 0
4> 6
4) 0
4) 0
4) 9
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
4) 0
4> 0
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
4) 0
SEC.
EFFL
( 4) 83
< 4) 100
4) 83
4> 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 100
4> 0
1 47
) 100
> 40
> too
4) 0
4> 0
4) 0
41 47
> 100
> 33
4) 0
4> 17
4> 0
4) 100
4) 0
) 17
4) 0
> 33
4) 0
) 83
41 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
4> 0
4> 0
4) 0
4> 0
4> 0
4> 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4> 17
4> 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
4) 0
4) 0
T.F.
EFFL
4) 83
4> 100
4> 100
4) 17
4) 0
4) 17
4) 100
4) 0
4) 100
3) 100
3> 17
4> 100
4) 0
6) 0
4) 0
4) 83
4> 47
4) 17
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 100
4) 0
4) 17
4) 0
4) 17
4) 0
4> SO
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
4) 0
4» 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 17
4> 0
DIG.
6LPG
4) SO
4> 0
4) 0
4) 100
4> 17
4> 47
4) 100
4) 17
4) 100
5> 100
4) 100
4> 100
4) 0
4) 100
4) 0
4) 0
4) 100
4) 100
4) 0
4) 17
41 17
4> 17
4> 33
4) 100
4) 0
4> 100
4) 0
4> 100
4> 100
4) 0
4) 0
4) 17
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4> 17
4> 0
4) 0
4) 100
4> 0
4> 17
4) 0
4) 47
4) 0
4) 0
4> 17
4> 0
4) 0
4) SO
4) 0
41 17
SEC.
3LDO
4> 0
4) 0
4) 50
4> 100
4> 50
4) 0
4> 100
4> SO
4) SO
5) 100
4) 100
4) 50
4) 0
4) 0
41 0
4) 0
4) SO
4) SO
4) 0
4> SO
4> 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 100
4> 0
41 50
4) 0
4) SO
4) 100
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) SO
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
4> 0
4> 100
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
4) 30
4> 30
4) 30
4) 0
4> SO
UrtSt
SCUM
2) 0
2) 0
2> 0
2) 100
2) 0
2) 50
2) 100
2) SO
2) 100
2) 1OO
2> 100
2) 100
2) 0
2) 100
2) 0
2) 0
2) 100
2) 100
21 0
2» 0
2) 0
2) 50
2) 0
2) 100
2) 0
2) 100
2> 0
2) 100
2) 100
2) 0
2) 50
2) 0
2) 0
2) 0
2) 0
2) 0
2) 0
2> 0
2) 100
2) 100
2) 0
2) 0
2> 0
2) 50
2) 0
2) SO
2> SO
2) 30
2) 100
2) 0
( 2) 0
T.F.
SLPO
2) 23
2) 100
2> 100
2> 73
2) 100
2) 0
1> 100
2) 25
2> 100
2) 100
2) 0
2> 100
2> 0
2) SO
2) 0
2> 0
2) 73
2) 100
2) 23
2) 0
21 0
2) 23
2) 0
2) 100
2) 0
2) 73
2) 0
2) 73
2) 23
2) 0
2) 0
2) 0
2> 0
2) 0
2) 0
2) 0
2) 23
2) 23
2) 0
2) 0
2) 0
2> 100
2) 0
2> 0
( 2) 0
< 2) 0
( 2) 0
( 2) 0
( 2) 25
( 2) 0
( 2) 0
COMB.
SLDO
4> 0
4) tOO
4) 25
4> 100
4) 50
4) 30
4> 73
4) 25
4> SO
3) 100
4) 100
4» 30
4> 0
4) 100
4> 0
4> 0
4) 50
4» 30
4) 100
4) 0
4) 0 :
4) 23
4) O
4) 100
4) 0
4( 30
4) 0
4) 50
4) 100
4) 0
4) 0
4> 25
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 50
4> 0
4) 0
4) 75
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 75
4> 0
4> 23
4) 0
4) 25
4> 25
4) 50
4> 0
( 4) 0


4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
2)
3»
2>
2>
4)
4>
4>
4)
2>
2)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
2)
4)
2)
4)
2)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4>
4>
4)
4>
4>
4>
4)
4)
                                                    AT ANY SAMPLE POINT
                                                    DETECTED
                                                     SAMPLES TAKEN

-------
                                                         PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF POLLUTANT  PARAMETERS

                                                                           PLANT 10
               PARAMETER

              I-IIENANIIIRENE
              PYRENE
              DlELDfclN
              4.4' -DDD
              At CIIA  bllC
              fcEIA-miC
              ANTIMONY
              ARSEMIC
              BERYLLIUM
              SELENIUM
INFL-
UENT
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
PRECL
EFFL
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
At 0
A) 17
A) 0
4> 0
A) 0
A) 0
6) 0
6EC.
EFFL
4) 0
A) 0
4> 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
> 0
> 0
> 0
> 0
T.F.
EFFL
6> 0
At 0
4> 1?
A) 17
4> 0
A) 1 7
A) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
DIO.
SLDO
4) SO
4) 17
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 100
4> 100
A) 30
4) 100
SEC. UASt
SLtlG SCUM
4> SO ( 2) 100
A) SO ( 2) SO
4) 0 < 2) 0
4) 0(2) 0
4) 0(2) 0
4) 0(2) 0
4) SO < 2) 100
6) 30 < 2) 100
4) SO < 2) SO
4) 100 < 2) 100
T.F. COMb.
6LDO SLt'G
2) 25 (4) 50 ( 4)
2) 0 < 4) 50 < 4)
2) 0 < 4) 0(4)
2) 0(4) 0(4)
2) 0(4) 0 < 4>
2) 0(4) 0(4)
2) 25 ( 4) 100 ( 2)
2) 23 ( 4) 100 (2)
2) 25 (4) SO ( 2>
2> 100 < 4) 100 ( 2)
CD
/\
     ho
     GJ
            lUILUIANIb NOT  LISTED UERE NUT  DETECTED AT  ANY  SAMPLE POINT
            UNCONFIKMED PESTICIDES WERE ASSUMED NOT DETECTED
            miMUEKS IN PAREN1IIESES ARE THE  NllhbtK OF SAMPLES TAKEN
            KKLLIM1NARY DATA  ONLY-TO BE VERIFIED

-------
                                                    SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL UAU
                                                             PLANT  11
  FRACUUN

  CONVENTIONAL;


  NON-CONVENT IONALS
 VOUTILES
PARAMETER

BOO
TOTAL  SUSP.  SOLIDS
OIL  C  GREASE

TOTAL  PHENOLS
TOTAL  SOLIbS
TOTAL  OISS.  SOLIDS
TOTAL  VOLATILE  SOLIDS
AHHONIA NITROGEN
TOC

BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLOKIOE
CHLOROBENZENE
1.1»1-TRICHLOROETHANE
1,1-OI,CHLOROEIHANE
CHLORDJE THANE
CHLOROFORM
li2-IRJANS-DICHLOROETIirLENE
1,3-DllcHLOROPROPYLENE
ETHYLBIENZENE
HETHYLENE CHLORIDE
METHYL CHLORIDE
DICHLOROBROMOHETHANE
TRICHLOROFLUOKOHETHANE
TETRACHLOROEIHYLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROEIHYLENE

2,4-DIHETHYLPHENOL
PHENOL

ACENAPHTHENE
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
1.2-DICHLOROHENZENE
NAPHTHALENE
B1SI2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALAU
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-BUTYL PHIHALATE
D1ETHYL PHIHALATE
1,2-BENZANIHRACENE
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED HERE NEVER DETECTED
L-LESS THAN!    N-D  NOT DETECTED!
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY —TO BE VERIFIED
 ACID EXTRACT


 BASE-NEUIRALS
mills
HG/L
HG/L
HG/L
UG/L
HC/L
HG/L
HG/L
MG/L
HG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/t
UG/L
U(./L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
OG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UC/L
OG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L



L
L


L


L


L
L
L





L

I





I
INHUEI
99
171
66
292
1920
1127
292
IB
72
33
5
9
170
6
5
5
3
3
10
90
5
5
5
55
50
73
2
15
10
4
10
3
52
1
4
2
5
,1


L
L


I


L


L
L
L



L
L
L


I

L


L
FRE-CL PCNT
LFFLUENT REM.
27
1*
9
60
1166
1109
203
10
30
1
5
5
12
0
5
1
0
5
1
21
5
5
5
7
2
3
25
30
10
3
0
10
59
10
2
1
5
73
92
86
77
12
2
30
44
58
97


93
100

80
100

90
77



07
96
96



25




50
50




I


L


I


L

I



L
L
L

L
L




L
SECONDARY COMBINED
EFFLUENT SLUOGE
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUM
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUM
NOT RUN
NOT FUN
2
2
5
13
0
5
1
0
5
1
30
5
0
5
II
7
5
25
30
10
0
10
10
51
0
2
0
5
5555
78250
773
322
35600
NOT RUH
26238
51
6770
401
N-0
125
N-0
223
517
N-0
744
N-0
193
1055
94
N-0
3
2
503
4
N-0
173
153
N-0
N-0
32
3683
213
41
N-D
22
SECONDARY
SLUDGE
1JI5
13->6
33
20
2122
NOT RUN
886
16
370
2
N-0
6
N-b
TO
N-0
N-0
17
3
11
33
5
N-0
0
1
8
5
N-0
300
H-0
N-0
N-0
N-D
924
N-0
N-0
N-0
N-0

-------
                                                              SUMMARY  Of ANALYTICAL  DATA

                                                                       PLANT   H
           K
-------
                                                        HASS  BALANCE  IN  LB8. PER  DAY

                                                                  PLANT   11
             FRACTION
             CONVENTIONALB
             NON-CONVENTIONALS
             VOLATILE8
00

A
 PARAMETER

 DOD
 TOTAL SUSP.  SOLIDS
 OIL a GREASE

 TOTAL PHENOLS
 TOTAL SOLIDS
 TOTAL DIBS.  SOLIDS
 TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDS
 AMMONIA NITROGEN
 TOC

 BENZENE
 CHLOROBENZENE
 l>t»l-TRICHLOROETHANE
 l»t-DICHLORO£THANE
 CHLOROETHAHE
 CHLOROFORM
,t»2-TRAHS-DICHLOROETHVLEHE
 tr3-DICHLOROPROPVLENE
 ETHVLBENZENE
 HETHYLEHE CHLORIDE
 METHYL CHLORIDE
 TRICHLOROFLUOROHETHANE
 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
 TOLUENE
 TftlCHLOROETHYLENE

 2r4-DINETHYLPHENOL
 PHENOL

 ACEHAPHTHENE
 HEXACHLOROBEHZENE
 1,2-DICIILOROBENZENE
 NAPHTHALENE
 BI8<2-ETHYLHEXYL>  PHTHALATE
 BUTYL BEHZYL PHTHALATE
 DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
 DIETHYL PHTHALATE
 lr2-BENZANTHRACENE
 CHRYSENE
 ANTHRACENE
 PHENANTHRENE

 ALDRIN
 ALPHA-BHC
 BETA-BHC

 ANTIMONY
 ARSENIC
 CADHIUH
 CHROMIUM
            SECONDARY BLUDBE  IS NOT  INCLUDED IN TOTAL  OUT  COLUMN
            POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED
            L-LESS THAN I   N-D  NOT DETECTED!
            PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY	TO BE VERIFIED
             ACID EXTRACT
             BASE-NEUTRALS
             PESTICIDES
             METALS
INFLUENT
31422
34B41
21113
73.3
423224
341408
93392
344*
J3I98
-10.7
N-D
34.4
1.9
N-D
1.4
l.A
N-D
3.3
29.?
N-D
N-D
17.4
16.0
23.3
.3
4.7
N-D
1.1
N-D
1.1
14.6
.2
1.4
.6
N-D
H-D
2.3
2.3
.5
.2
L 0.1
.4
9.2
2.7
48. 8
TOTAL OUT
14148
82762
3393
22.0
40V421
-
?1170
3098
18342
.4
.1
4.0
.3
.3
.4
.8
N-D
.3
7.8
L 0.1
L 0.1
2.4
1.0
1.0
N-D
.2
.2
.9
L 0.1
L 0.1
22.7
.2
.3
.2
L 0.1
L 0.1
.3
.3
.4
N-D
N-D
1.1
10.3
3.0
44.2
PRE-CL
EFFLUENT
8395
4343
2822
21.7
373833
333408
44943
3047
9348
.2
N-D
4.0
.1
H-D
.4
L 0.1
N-D
.3
4.7
H-D
N-D
2.4
.3
1.0
N-D
N-D
N-D
iV
L 0.1
N-D
18.8
N-D
.3
.2
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
.4
N-D
N-D
1.0
10.3
2.3
14.3
COMBINED
SLUDGE
35S3
7B219
773
.3
333B4
NOT RUN
26227
30.4
8774
.4
.1
N-D
.2
.3
N-D
.7
N-D
.2
1.1
I 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
.3
L 0.1
N-D
.2
.2
N-D
N-D
t 0.1
3.9
.2
I 0.1
N-»
L 0.1
L 0.1
.3
.3
N-D
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
.2
.5
29.9
SECONDARY
SLUDGE

637
698
  16.4

L  0.1
1060
NOT RUN
443
                                                                                                                       IBS
   0.1
   0.1
   N-D
   O.I
   N-D
   N-D
   0.1
   O.I
   O.I
   O.I
   0.1
   0.1
   O.I
   0.1
   O.I

   N-D
     .1

   N-D
   H-D
   N-D
   N-D
     .3
   H-D
   N-D
   N-D
   N-D
   N-D
   N-D
   N-D

   N-D
   N-D
   N-D

   0. 1
   O.I
   0.1
     .6

-------
                                                         MASS BALANCE IN LBB.

                                                                   PLANT  11
                                             PER IIAV
              FRACTION

              METALS
              NON-COHV.  METALS
00
CO
A
PARAMETER

COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
ZINC

ALUMIHUH
BARIUM
BORON
CALCIUM
COBALT
IRON
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
MOLYBDENUM
SODIUM
TIN
TITANIUM
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
INFLUENT
78.3
22»
30.8
.2
20,3
I.I
6.1
«2.y
290
57. 1
71.4
28643
28.1
JOB
11399
14. 8
22.1
44814
33.4
4.3
2.8
,2
TOTAL OUT
47.7
27B
49.0
.4
19.3
1.0
2.7
72.0
_
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
PRE-CL
EFFLUENT
19. Q
90.7
40.4
I 0.1
13.4
,9
2.2
31.1
101
17.1
80. 9
23924
37.8
48.9
28394
12.7
28.8
43424
24.7
1.7
2.8
4.9
COMBINED
SLUDGE
47.9
179
8.4
.3
3.9
.1
.3
40.9
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
SECONDARY
SLUDGE

    .8
    .2
                                                                                                                        I  0.
                                                                                                                        L  0.
                                                                                                                        t  0.
                                                                                                                        L  0.
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
HOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
            tiLLUNUAKY SLUUOE 18 NOT  INCLUDED  IN  TOTAL OUT COLUMN
            POILU1ANTS NOT LISTED UERE NOT DETECTED
            I-LESS THAN!  H-D  NOT DETECTED)
            •"•'LIMINARY DATA ONLY	TO BE VERIFIED

-------
                               PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF  POLLUTANT  PARAMETERS

                                                PLANT 11
          PARAMETER

         1rIf1-TRICHLOROETHANE
         Irl-DICHLOROETHANE
         TETRACHLQROETHYLENE
         TOLUENE
         TRICHLOROETHYLENE
         DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
         ANTHRACENE
         PHENANTHRENE
         ANTIMONY
         ARSENIC
         CADMIUM
         CHROMIUM-
         COPPER
         CYANIDE
         LEAD
         NICKEL
         SELENIUM
         SILVER
         ZINC
         BENZENE
         1,2-TRANS-DICHLOROETHYLENE
         ETHYLBEHZENE
         HETHYLENE  CHLORIDE
!-•       PHENOL
£>       NAPHTHALENE
00       BIS<2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
         CHLOROFORM
         DIETHYL PHTHALATE
         2.4-DIHETHYLPHENOL
         HEXACHLOROBENZENE
         ALDRIN
         MERCURY
         BUTYL  BENZYL PHTHALATE
         ALPHA-BHC
         BETA-DHC
         CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
         CHLOROBENZENE
         CHLOROETHANE
         1i3-DICHLOROPROPYLENE
         METHYL CHLORIDE
         DICHLOROBROMOMETHANE
         TRICHLOROFLUOROHETHANE
         ACEHAPHTHENE
         1> 2-DICHLOROBENZENE
         1>2-BENZANTHRACENE
         CHRY6ENE
         IIEPTACHLOR
         OAMHA-BHC
        POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED HERE NOY  DETECTED AT ANY SAMPLE POINT
        UNCONFIRMED  PESTICIDES  HERE  ASSUMED NOT DETECTED
        NUMBERS  IN PARENTHESES  ARE THE  NUMBER  OF  SAMPLES  TAKEN
        PRELIMINARY  DATA ONLY-TO BE  VERIFIED
INFL-
UENT
100
100
100
100
100
too
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
too
100
100
100
too
B3
83
03
93
83
83
83
47
67
SO
33
33
33
17
17
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
PRE CL.
EFFL
4) 100
4> 33
4) 100
4> 50
41 100
4) 47
4) . 0
6) 0
4> 100
4) 100
4) 100
41 100
4) 100
A» 100
4) 109
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) tOO
4) 47
4> 17
4) 33
4) .83
4) : 0
4> 0
4) 100
4) 83
4) 33
4> 0
4) 33
4> SO
4> 17
At 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 17
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
SEC.
EFFL
4> 100
4> 17
4> 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) 93
4)
*>
4)
4>
4»
4)
4)
4>
4)
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
4) 0
4) 100
4) 17
4> 83
4> 47
4) 0
4» 0
4) 100
4) 33
4) 33
4) 0
4) 17
4) 83
4> 0
4) 17
4) 0
4) 0
4) 33
4> 0
4> 0
4> 0
4) 0
4) 17
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 17
4) 33
COMB.
SLDO
4> 0
4> 100
4) 47
4) 100
4) 47
4> 33
.4) 33
4) 33
100
100
too
, 100
100
too
100
100
100
100
100
4) 100
4) 100
41 100
4) 83
41 50
4) 17
4) 100
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
4) 0
) iOO
4) 33
4> 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 47
4) 83
4) 0
4) 50
4> 0
4) 17
4) 17
4) 0
4> 17
4) 17
41 0
4) 0
SEC.
' SLDO
4> 0
4) 100
4) 47
4) 100
4> 47
4) 0
41 0
4) 0
4» IOO
4> 100
4> IOO
4> 100
4) 100
4) 100
4> 100
4) 17
4> IOO
41 100
4) 100
4> 83
4> 17
4) 33
4> 47
4) 17
4) 0
4) 100
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 47
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
4) 50
4> 0
4) 17
4> 33
4> 0
4) 17
4) 0
4> 0
4> 0
4) 0
4) 0
( 4> 0


4>
4>
4>
4>
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4>
4)
. 4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4>
( &)
( 4)

-------
                                                               SUMMARY Qf ANALYTICAL DATA
                                                                        PLANT
            FRACTION

            CONVENIIONALS




            NON-CONVENT10NALS
H-
CD
            VULAIILES
PARAMETER

BOO
TOTAL SUSP. SOLIOS
COO
OIL t CREASE

TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS
TOTAL OISS. SUL10S
SEITLEABLE SOLIDS
TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDS
VOLATILE OISS. SOU OS
TOTAL VOL. SUS. SULIDS
AMMONIA NITROGEN
TOC
BENJENE
CARBON TETRACHLOKIDl
CHLOROBEN2ENE
 ,2-OICHLOROEIHANE
 .1.1-TMICIILOaOETHANt
 ,1-OICHLQKOEIHANE
 .li2-IRICHLOHOEThANE
 •1.2.2-IETRACHLukOCTHANE
 HLOROETHANE
 HLOROFOKM
 ,2-TRANS-OICHLOKOETHYLENE
 ,2-OICHLOROPkOPAKE
ETHYLBEN2ENE
HETHYLENE CHLUKlOt
HEIHYL CHLORIDE
IR ICHLURQFLUOKOntlltANE
01CHLOROOIF LUUROHE THANE
TETRACHLUROElMYLtNE
TOLUENE
IKICHLOROEIIirLE'NE
VINYL CHLOK10C
                               2-CHLOROPHENOL
                               PHENOL
            AGIO EXTRACT
            BASE-NLUIRALS      1.2-0

           PULLUIANIS NOT LISTED HERE NEVER LiEUCILD
           L-LLSS THANI    N-D  NOT OETEClEOi
           PKELIHINARY DATA UNLY — TO BE VERH-ILU
UNITS
HC/L
HC/L
HC/L
HC/L
UC/L
HC/L
HC/L
HL/L
HC/L
HC/L
HC/L
HC/L
HC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
iNf LULNI
L
L
L
L
L
L
L


L
L
L



I


106
178
372
46
36
1055
83C
6
310
192
90
18
59
4

10
41
10
1
10
31
23
100
10
0
5
L
I
L
I
L
I
I
L
L
L
L

L
L
L



L
L
L
SECONDARY PCNI
EFFLUENT rt£H.
10
14
107
9
20
835
613
0
1'Jb
164
9
13
17
0
0
1
1
22
10
1
10
8
7
28
10
,
1
90
92
71
80
47
21
2
100
38
4
90
28
71
84
67
50

90
46



74
70
72


BO
I
1
I
L
t
I
L
L


L
L
L



I
L

PRIMARY
EFFLUENT
75
90
267
33
83
940
844
1
233
212
61
17
50
1
1
1
1
34
1
1
1
10
2
1
1
5
58
10
1
10
56
36
61
10
1
4
PRIMARY
SLUDGE
959
4150
4773
NOT RUN
51
4434
5333
66
2961
2533
2942
31
508
2
N-D
1
1
0
23
0
N-D
7
N-0
292
0
24
11
2
5
6
N-0
113
0
17
N-0
N-0
SECONDARY
SLUDCE
2563
9825
12240
NOT RUN
50
9043
NOT RUN
521
6394
NOT RUN
6375
24
1683
1
N-0
1
N-0
N-0
0
N-0
1
N-0
0
1
N-0
N-0
3
N-0
1
N-0
N-0
14652
N-0
292
N-0
400
                                                                  UC/L
                                                                                         10
                                                                                                          L   10
                                                                                                                          N-0
                                                                                                                                      N-0

-------
                                                               SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL DATA
                                                                       PLANT  12
           . FRACTION

            BASE-NEUTRALS
           .PESTICIDES
            METALS
GO
ff>
 A
            NON-CONV.  HETALS
PARAMETER

FLUORANTHENE
ISQPHORONE
NAPHTHALENE
BISI2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
BUTYL BENZYL PHIHALATE
DI-N-BUTVL PHTHALATE
DI ETHYL PHTHALATE
1,2-BENJANIHRACENE
CHRYSENE
ANTHRACENE
PHENANIHRENE
PVRENE

ALPMA-BHC
CAHHA-BHC

ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUH
CADHIUH
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
HERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
THALLIUM
ZINC

ALUMINUM
BARIUH
CALCIUH
IRON
HAGNESIUH
MANGANESE
SODIUM
UNITS
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
NG/L
NG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
NG/L
UC/L
UC/L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
MC/L
UC/L
HC/L
UC/L
HG/L
INFLUENT
L
L


L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L



L
L







L

L








9
16
2
20





3
3
3
30
37
145
50
2
17*
414
922
691
SB
517
16V
50
4
100
1615
366
24*
B4
2686
32
109
1*5
I
t
L

I
L
L
L
L
L
L
L



L
L





L

L
L
I








SECONDARY PCNI
EFFLUENT KEH.
3
16
2
10








5
27
42
50
2
15
4B
66
375
24
200
121
50
2
100
267
36
94
76
257
32
77
140



50








63
27
71


91
66
91
56
59
61
26

50

83
90
61
10
91

29
3
PRIMARY PRIMARY
EFFLUENT SLUDGE
L 3
3
1
21
L 5
I 6
L 6
L 3
L 3
1
1
L 3
33
39
266
147
153
251
440
688
177
185
533
272
134
2
134
1100
329
329
79
1705
32
248
143
4
N-0
8
425
II
16
to
N-0
N*D
37
37
11
N-0
N-D
1113
11
L 6
970
3217
6183
2940
122
8333
677
17
80
17
12083
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
SECONDARY
SLUOGt
7
N-0
6
965
N-0
7
47
13
13
5
5
39
N-0
N-D
1297
19
L 6
10046
28620
44540
3370
400
17167
3172
41
144
16
66560
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOt RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
           POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED HERE  NEVER  DETECTED
           L-LESS THANI    N-D  NOT DETECTED!
           PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY —TO  BE VERIFIED

-------
                                                    MASS BALANCE IN UBS. PER PAY

                                                              PLANT  12
            M1f2>2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
 HLOROETHANE
 HLOROFORH
 •2-TRAN8-OICHLOROETHYLENE
 .2-DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYLBENZENE
HETHYLENE CHLORIDE
HETHYL CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROFLUORONETHANE
DICHLOROD1FLUOROHETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROEIHYLENE
VINYL CHLORIDE

2-CHLOROPHENOL
PHENOL
                               1> 2-DIPHENYLHYDRAZIHE
                               FLUORANTHENE
                               NAPHTHALENE
                               BI6<2-ETHYLHEXYL> PHTHALATE
                               BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
                               DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
                               DIETHYL PHTHALATE
                               1i2-B£NZANTHRACENE
                               CHRYSENE
                               ANTHRACENE
                               PHENANTHKENE
                               PYRENE
INFLUENT TOTAL
324*5 13740
55707 48031
116203 63934
14245
11.7 6.4
329440 304032
259209
99231 91438
39976
28062 32330
5423 4MB
18482 11829
N-D 1 0.
N-D L 0.
N-D L 0.
N-D L 0.
19. B 3.
.2 .
N-D 1 0.
N-D L 0.
.3 10.
.9
.3 1 .
N-D 1 0.
3.2
12.7 7.
N-0 1 0.
N-D L 0.
N-D 1 0.
9. A 2,
7.3 37. (
31.2 8.
N-D .1
.1 N-l
l.S
.3 N-
N-D L 0.
.5 L 0.
4.1 7.
N-D L 0.
N-D L 0.
N-D
N-D L 0.
N-D 1 0.
N-D
N-D
N-D
SECONDARY
OUT EFFLUENT
2948
4373
33S28
2759
6.2
240761
2S3803
61746
37415
2739
3903
S362
N-D
N-0
N-D
N-D
3.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
H-D
.3
N-0
N-D
N-D
A. 9
N-D
N-0
N-0
1 2.4
> 2.2
I 8. 6
3 N-0
J N-0
t N-D
9 N-D
N-0
N-D
3.0
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-0
N-D
2 N-D
2 N-D
2 N-D
PRIMARY SECONDARY
SLUDGE SLUDGE
4795 5977
20742 22916
23857 28549
NOT RUN NOT RUN
.3 •»
22159 21093
26654 NOT RUN
14798 14914
12660 NOT RUN
14702 14869
157 36.4
2341 3926
N-D L 0.1
L 0. t 0.1
L 0. L 0.1
L 0. N-D
L 0. N-0
L 0.1
1 0. N-0
N- L 0.1
1 0. N-0
N- I 0.1
1. L 0,1
L 0. N-D
N-D
L 0. I 0,1
1 0. N-0
L 0. I 0.1
L 0. N-0
N- N-D
34.2
L 0. N-D
1 0. .7
N-D N-D
N-D .9
N-D N-D
L 0. L 0.1
L 0. L 0.1
2. 2.3
1 0. N-0
L 0. L 0.1
L 0. .1
N-D L 0.1
N-D I 0.1
.2 L 0.1
.2 I 0.1
L 0.1 L 0.1
           POLLUFANTS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED
           L-LE8S THANI  N-D  NOT DETECTED)
           PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY	TO BE VERIFIED

-------
                                                     MASS BALANCE IN IBS.  PER DAY

                                                               PLANT  12
             FRACTION
             PESTICIDES
             METALS
             NON-CONV. HETALS
H"
r/i
8
/I
PARAMETER

ALPHA-BHC
OAMHA-BHC

ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
CADHIUH
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
THALLIUM
ZINC

ALUMINUM
BARIUM
CALCIUM
IRON
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
SODIUM
INFLUENT
I 0.1
I O.I
43.3
H-D
34. 3
12?
288
278
18.1
.2
Sl.l
H-D
1.3
N-D
304
114
76.1
24133
902
10100
34.2
49190
TOTAL OUT
L 0,1
L 0.1
21. 6
I Oil
32.6
78.2
142
140
8.9
L 0.1
48.5
.2
.7
.1
299
_
-
-
-
-
-
-
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
L O.I
L 0.1
13.0
N-D
4.6
14.9
24; 9
117
7.4
N-D
37.7
H-D
H-D
H-D
83.3
11.2
29.4
23688
80.4
9944
23.9
43837
PRIMARY
SLUDGE
N-D
N-D
3.6
L O.t
4.8
16.1
30.9
14.7
.6
L 0.1
3.4
u 0.1
.4
L 0.1
60.4
NOT RUH
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUH
NOT RUN
HOT RUN
NOT RUN
SECONDARY
SLUDGE
N-D
N-D
3.0
L 0.1
23.4
67.2
104
7.9
.9
L 0.1
7.4
L 0.1
.3
L 0.1
153
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUH
HOT RUN
NOT RUN
            POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED HERE NOT DETECTED
            L-LES9 THANI  N-D  NOT DETECTED*
            PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY	TO RE VERIFIED

-------
                                    PERCENT  OCCURRENCE OF POLLUTANT  PARAMETERS

                                                      PLANT  12
GT
C£
A
to
CJ
  PARAMETER

 1. I . 1-IRlCHLOROEIHANE
 CHLOROFORM
 Him bENZENE
 HETHYLENE CHLORIDE
 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
 TOLUENE
 PHENOL
 61642-ETHYLHEXYLk PHTHALATE
 ANTIMONY
 CADMIUM
 CHROMIUM
 COPPER
 CYANIDE
 LEAD
 MERCURY
 NICKEL
 ZINC
 TRICHLOROETHYLEME
 SILVER
 I.I-DICHLOROCTHANE
 NAPHTHALENE
 OAMHA-BHC
 2-CHLOROPHENOL
 ALPHA-bHC
 CHLOROETHANE
 1 ,2  TRANS-OICIILOROETHYLENE
 1.2-DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE
 BENZENE
 CARBON  TETRACHLORIDE
 CHLORObENZENE
 1,2-DICHLOROEIHANE
 1i1.2-TRICHLOROETHANE
 I.1.2r2-TETRACHLOROETHAN£
 1,2-DICHLOKOFROPANE
 METHYL  CHLORIDE
 TRI CHI OfcOFl UOROME THANE
 DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
 VINYL CHLORIDE
 FLIIORANTHENE
 1SOPHORONE
 BUTYL bENZYL PHTHALAIE
 DI N-bUIYL  PHTHALATE
 [lit THVL PHTHALATE
 I.2-bEN2ANIHRACEN£
 LHR'YSENE
 ANTHRACENE
 I lit HAHllll.LNt
 ^ VM HE
 /IK SI III!.
 bt h VI L II/M
 SLI LN1IJM
hOLIUTANTS NOT 1ISTED UERE NOT  HEIECIED
UIK 4INFIKMED  PESTICIDES UERE ASSUMED NOT
NIIHbt'RS IN PARENTHESES ARE THE  NUHbER OF
PRELIMINARY  DATA ONLY.-TO BE VERIFIED
INFL-
UENT
100 (
100 <
100 <
100 (
100 (
too <
too <
100 (
100 (
100 (
100 <
100 <
100 <
100 (
100 (
100 <
100 <
63 <
83 (
47 (
SO (
SO <
33 <
33 (
17 <
17 (
17 4
0 <
0 4
0 <
0 <
0 <
0 <
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4


4)
4)
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4)
4k
4k
4k
4k
4)
4k
4k
4)
4k
4)
4)
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4)
41
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4)
4k
4k
4)
4)
4k
4)
4k
4)
4)
4)
4)
4k
4)
4)
f R-IM.
EFFL
100 4 5k
100 4 5k
100 4 3k
100
100
100
63
too
too
100
100
100
100
100
63
100
100
100
so
60
33
47
0
33
0
0
0'
o
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
17
Q
o
0
o
0
17
17
0
17
3k
3k
3k
4k
4k
4k
4)
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
3k
4)
3k
4k
4k
4k
4k
Sk
3k
4k
9k
3k
3k
Sk
3k
3k
3k
5k
Sk
5k
3k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4)
4k
17 44k
17 44k
SEC,
EFFL
100 4 4k
100 4 4k
0 4 4k
100 ( 4k
100 4 4k
47 4 4k
0 4 4k
100 4 4k
47 4 4k
100 4 4k
100 4 4k
100 < 4k
100
33
0
too
100
100
0
0
0
47
0
17
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
4)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Q
0
0
Q
0
0
o
0
4k
4k
4k
4k
41
4k
4)
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4)
4k
4k
4k
4k
PRIM.
SLDG
33 4k
0
63
100
0
100
0
100
100
100
too
100
100
17
83
100
too
33
100
63
17
o
0
0
33
100
o
too
0
33
SO
17
0
17
17
63
30
100
33
0
17
SO
33
0
0
SO
so
so
100
0
100
4)
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4)
4k
4)
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
SEC.
SLDQ
0
17
0
17
0
100
17
100
100
100
100
100
100
17
100
100
100
0
100
17
17
0
0
o
0
33
o
63
0
30
0
0
33
0
0
17
0
too
33
0
0
17
SO
SO
so
17
17
83
100
0
4k
4)
4k
4k
4k
4k
4)
4k
4k
3k
5k
3k
4k
4k
4k
3k
3)
4k
3k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4)
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4)
100 4 4k
                                                        AT  ANY  SAMPLE POINT
                                                        DETECTED
                                                         SAMPLES  TAKEN

-------
                      PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF POLLUTANT PARAMETERS

                                       PLANT J2

                                    INFL-      FRIMi      SEC.      PfllM.      SEC.
   PARAMETER                         UENT       EFFL       EFFL      SLDP       SLDO
  THALLIUH                             0  {  il   17  <  6)    0 < 6>   »7  (  A>   47 I t>
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED MERE NOT DETECTED  AT  ANY  SAMPLE  POINT
UNCONFIRMED PESTICIDES HERE ASSUMED NOT  DETECTED
NUMBERS IN PARENTHESES ARE THE NUMBER  OF SAMPLES  TAKEN
PRELIMINARY DATA OHLY-IO  BE VERIFIED

-------
                                                                 SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL  DATA

                                                                          PLANT   13
              FKACT1ON
              CONVENIIONALB
              NON-CONWENT I ONALB
              VQLATILE8
H-
A
              ACID  EXTRACT
              BASE-NEUTRALS
             CtSllLIDtS
PARAMETER

BOD
TOTAL SUSP. SOt. IbS
COD
OIL I OREASE

TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL 60LIDB
TOTAL DIBS. SOLIDS
SEITLEABLE SOLIDS
TOTAL VOLATILE  SOLIDS
VOLATILE DISS.  SOLIDS
TOTAL VOL. BUS.  SOLIDS
AMMONIA NITROGEN
TOC

BENZENE
1 > I (1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CHLOROFORM
1.2-TRANS-DICHLOROETHYLENE
E fHYLBENZENE
HETHYLENE CHLORIDE
DI CHLOROflROHOME THANE
TRICHLOROFLUOROHETHANE
CI4LORODI BROHOHEIHANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
IRICHLOROETHYLENE

2>4-DINITROPHENOL
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENOL

FLUORANIHCNE
NAPHTHALENE
BI8<2-ETHYLHEXYL> PHTHALATE
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
1r2-BENZANIHRACENE
11112-BENZOFLUORANTHENE
CHRY8ENE
ANTHRACENE
FLUOMENE
PIIENANTHRENE
PYRENE

OAHHA-BHC
PCB-1242
f-CB-1254
UNITS
HO/L
HO/I
HO/L
HO/L
UO/L
HO/L
HO/L
HL/L
HO/L
HO/L
HO/L
HO/L
HO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
US/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
NO/L
NO/L
NO/L
INFLUENT




L


I


L
1
L






L
L

L

L
L
L
I
L
L
L
L
L


49
ISO
245
34
27
891
704
4
230
194
103
17
49
1
1
7
1
3
3
1
1
1
11
10
4
I
3
1
3
2
12
3
2
3
3
10
3
3
3
3
3
100
23033
1483

I


L
L

I
I

I
1
L

L
L
L


1
I

t

L
L
L
L
I
L
L
L


L
PRE-CL
SECONDARY PCNT
EFFLUENT REM.
IS
13
49
13
13
739
493
1
123
130
7
2
9












3
1
0
3
2
V
3
2
3
3
10
S
3
3
3
3
14
273
300
78
91
82
38
44
17
2
73
47
33
93
88
82


84

47
100



91
90
63

47
100


23











99
44

L


L
L

L
L


L


L
L
L


I
L

L

L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L



TERTIARY
EFFLUENT
10
4
34
12
17
720
722
1
141
170
3
1
9
1
1
8
1
1
I
3
1
1
0
1
1
3
1
1
3
2
14
3
2
3
3
10
3
3
3
3
3
19
62
83
PRIHARY
6LUDOE
8330
93000
33847
4223
231
36370
12300
998
28143
3730
34230
133
8447
13
N-D
N-D
38
24
34
N-D
43
N-D
N-B
eaio
N-D
N-D
N-D
402
113
12
3131
270
178
N-D
07
34
87
173
20
173
130
N-D
N-D
N-D
SECONDARY
6LUDOE
4784
38293
22247
417
44
27410
NOT RUN
868
13127
NOT RUN
77790
13
343O
4
N-D
N-D
1
N-D
23
N-D
17
N-D
N-D
9322
N-D
N-D
N-D
291
33
43
1479
278
13
7
N-D
H-D
N-D
143
N-D
143
32
N-D
N-D
N-D
            r-OILUTANTS NOT  LISTED UERE NEVER DETECTED
            LI ESS THAN!     N-D   NOT DETECTED)
            PERCENT KEMOVAL  BASED ON PRECHLORINATED SECONDARY EFFLUENT
            PKEl IH1NARY DATA ONLY	TO BE VERIFIED

-------
                                                            SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL  DATA
                                                                     PLANT   13
         FRACTION
         HETALB
         NON-CONV,  HETALS
*
PARANETER

ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
THALLIUM
ZINC

ALUMINUM
BARIUM
CALCIUM
IRON
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
SODIUM
UNITS
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
NO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
HO/L
UO/L
NO/L
UO/L
HO/L
INFLUENT
L 50
L 90
L 2
35
117
2122
SB
47
I 10
L 50
?
L 100
233
2543
130
88
2212
34
I3B
42
L
L
L



L
L
L
L
L
L








PRE-CL
SECONDARY PCNT
EFFLUENT REH.
30
30
2
3
24
333
20
200
10
50
2
100
30
102
4?
BO
113
32
113
5?



?5
79
74
44



78

87
»3
42
?
?5
4
17
5
L
L
L
I


L
L
L
I
L
L








TERTIARY
EFFLUENT
50
30
2
5
34
4454
20
200
10
50
2
100
35
103
2?
BO
SI
31
4?
SB'
PRIMARY
SLUDGE
102
378
344
22217
33100
104117
24000
84033
4047
47
303
5
104317
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
SECONDARY
SLUDGE
34
192
153
9247
14747
29033
10447
33000
2110
50
916
4
43317
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
        POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED UERE NEVER DETECTED
        L-LESS THAN!    N-D  NOT DETECTED!
        PERCENT REMOVAL BASED ON PRECHLORINATED SECONDARY EFFLUENT
        PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY	TO BE VERIFIED

-------
                                                     HA88  BALANCE  IN  LBS.  PER  DAY

                                                                PLANT   13
             FRACTION
             CONVENTIONAL8
             NON-CONVENTIONALS
                   PARAMETER

                   BOO
                   TOTAL SUSP.
                   COD
                   OIL I OREASE
                                            SOLIDS
             VOLATILE8
Co
/I
ACID EXTRACT
             BABE-NEUTRALS
TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL BUI 108
TOTAL DI8S. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDS
VOLATILE DI88. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOL. SUB. SOLIDS
AMMONIA NITROGEN
TOC

BENZENE
1.1.I-TRICHLDROETHANE
CHLOROFORM
1r2-TRAHS-DICHLOROETHYLENE
ETHYLBENZENE
HETHYLEHE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHTLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE

2>4-DINITROPHENOL
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENOL

FLUORANTHENE
NAPHTHALENE
BI6(2-ETHYLH£XYL> PHTHALATE
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
OI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
DIETHYL  PHTHALATE
1.2-BENZANTHKACENE
11.12-BENZOFLUORANTHENE
CHRYSENE
ANTHRACENE
FLUORENE
PHENANTHRENE
PYRENE

OAHHA-BIIC
PCb-1242
PCB-1234

AN1 ItlONY
ARSENIC
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
            POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED MERE NOT DETECTED
            I  IES8 THANI  N-D  NOI DETECTED)
            MIEI IHINARY DATA ONLY	TO BE VERIFIED
             ht IAI S
INFLUENT
8773
19073
31732
4431
3.4
113493
90000
29230
24704
13382
2124
4224
N-D
U 0.1
.9
N-D
,3
.3
N-D
1.1
1.3
.a
.1
.4
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
1.4
N-fl
.3
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
3.2
.2
N-D
N-D
N-D
7.0
TOTAL OUT
173430
1003944
388774
I922B
2.9
794071
-
403744
-
1971884
333
94387
. 1
N-D
.1
I O.I
L O.J
.4
.4
I 0.1
242
N-D
N-D
I 0.1
7.4
.9
1.1
44.6
7.0
.8
.2
L O.|
L 0.1
1 O.|
3.7
I 0.1
3.7
.9
I O.I
L O.I
N-D
.»
b.O
4. I
243
PRE-CL
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
1423
1483
S407
1704
1.7
81818
74943
13444
14421
79B
144
942
N-D
N-0
.1
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
N-D
L O.I
N-D
N-D
N-D
I 0.1
t 0.1
N-D
N-D
1.0
N-D
.3
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-0
L O.I
L 0.1
N-0
N-D
N-D
N-D
.4
PRIMARY
SLUDGE
4243
47481
24923
2112
.1
29273
4247
14044
1874
27114
74.4
4232
L O.I
N-D
N-D
L O.|
L 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
H-D
4.4
N-D
N-D
N-D
.3
L 0.
t 0.
1.
.
L 0.
N-
L 0.
L 0.
L 0.
L 0.
L 0.
L 0.
L 0.
N-D
N-D
N-D
L O.I
.2
.2
II 1
SECONDARY
BLUDOE
149342
9349BO
334444
13410
1.1
484960
NOT RUN
376034
NOT RUN
1943972
312
91213
.1
N-D
N-D
L O.I
N-D
.4
.4
N-D
238
N-D
N-D
N-D
7.3
.8
1.1
42.0
4.9
.4
.2
N-
N-
N-
3.
N-
3.
.6
N-D
N-D
N-D
.8
4.8
3.9
232

-------
                                                    HAB8 BALANCE IN LBS.  PER DAY

                                                              PLANT  13
            FRACTION
            HETALS
            NON-CONV. HETALS
PARAMETER

COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
BELENIUH
SILVER
THALLIUM
ZINC

ALUMINUM
BARIUM
CALCIUM
IRON
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
SODIUM
INFLUENT
14.9
270
7.3
L O.I
N-D
N-D
1.2
N-D
2V. 7
327
14.5
11194
292
4270
17. S
7991
TOTAL OUT
39?
B39
27S
.8
53.7
1.3
23.1
,1
11BB
_
-
-
-
-
-
-
PRE-CL
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
2.6
tl .5
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
3.3
20.2
5.4
B900
12.5
3490
12.7
4537
PRIMARY
SLUDGE
14.3
52.0
13.0
I 0.1
3.0
L 0.1
.2
L 0.1
33,2
HOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
HOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
SECONDARY
SLUDGE
349
726
242
.8
52.7
1.3
22.9
.1
1132
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
B
**
           POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED HERE NOT DETECTED
           L-LES9 THAN*  N-D  NOT DETECTEDI     .  >
           PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY	TO BE VERIFIED

-------
                                   PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF POLLUTANT PARAMETERS

                                                    PLANT 13
A
 PARAMETER

CHI OROFOKM
METHYIENE CHLORIDE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
8IS<2~ETHYLHEXYLt PHTHALATE
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
t EAD
SILVER
ZINC
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
ETHYLBENZEME
Dl N-6UTYL PHTIIALATE
PCB-1242
1.1.1-IRICHLOROETHANE
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENOL
PCB-I23«
MERCURY
2.4-DINITROPHENOL
BENZENE
I,2-TRAN8-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BICHLOROBROHOHE THANE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
CIIL ORODI BfcOHOHE THANE
FLUORANTIIENE
NAPHTHALENE
BUTYL BENZYL  PHIHALATE
1)1 ETHYL PHIHALATE
1.2-BENZANTHRACENE
11.12-bENZOFLUORANTHENE
CHfcYSENE
ANTHRACENE
FLUORENE
PHENANTHRENE
PYRENE
OAHMA-BHC
ANTIHONY
AK8ENIC
CADHIUH
NICKEL
3Ei ENIUH
IIIAtl 1IIH
INFL-
UENT
100
100
100
100
100
too
100
100
100
100
100
83
47
67
67
30
33
33
33
33
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Pfc£ CL.
EFFL
At 67
At 17
At 50
At 0
41 100
At SO
At 83
At 100
At 0
At 0
At 100
At 0
At 0
At 100
At 33
4) 0
4) 17
4) 17
4> 0
At 0
A) 0
A> 0
At 0
A> 0
A) 0
A> 0
A) 0
A) 0
A) 0
A) 0
A) 0
A> 0
At 0
4) 0
A) 0
A) 0
A) 0
A) SO
A) 0
A) 0
A) 0
4) 0
A) 0
4) 0
TERT.
EFFL
A> 100
A) 33
A) 17
A) 0
A) 100
A) 0
At 100
A> 100
A) 0
A> 0
A) 100
A) 0
A) 0
A) 100
A) 17
A) 0
At 33
A) 30
A) 17
A) 0
At 0
At 0
At 0
At 100
At 0
A) A7
At 0
At 0
At 0
At 0
At 0
At 0
At 0
At 0
At 0
At 0
At 0
At 30
At 0
At 0
At 0
At 0
At 0
At 0
PRIM.
BLDQ
At 0
A) 83
A) 0
A) 100
At 83
At 100
At 100
At 100
At 100
At 100
At 100
At 0
At 83
At 30
At 0
At 0
At 0
At 83
At 0
At 100
At 0
At |00
At 83
At 0
At 30
At 0
At 30
At 17
At 33
At 0
At 33
At 33
At 33
At 83
At 33
At 83
At A7
At 0
At 100
At 100
At 100
At 100
At 100
At 33
SEC.
SLBG
At 0
At 83
At 0
At 100
At 83
At 100
At 100
At 100
At 100
At 100
At 100
At 0
At 0
At 33
At 0
At 0
At 0
At 83
At 0
At 100
At 0
At 83
At 17
At 0
At 30
At 0
At 17
At 17
At 33
At 17
At 0
At 0
At 0
At 17
At 0
At 17
At 17
At 0
At 100
At 100
At 100
At 100
At 100
At 33


At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
31
At
At
At
3t
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
At
3)
At
A)
At
At
At
At
           fUllUIANTS NOI LISTED  UERE  NOT  DETECTED AT ANY SAMPLE POINT
           UNCONFIRMED PESTICIDES  WERE  ASSUMED NOT DETECTED
           NUHbERS IN PARENTHESES  ARE  THE  NUMBER OF SAMPLES TAKEN
           >KLI IMINARY DATA ONLY-TO  BE  VERIFIED

-------
                                                                SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL DATA

                                                                         PLANT  11
              FRACTION
              CONVENTIONALS
              NON-CONVENTIONALS
             VOLATILES
H-   •*"
G   °
en     .
                   PARAMETER

                   BOD
                   TOTAL SUSP. SOLIDS
                   COO
                   OIL C CREASE

                   TOTAL PHENOLS
                   TOTAL SOLIDS
                   TOTAL OISS. SOLIDS
                   SETTLEABLE SOLIDS
                   TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDS
                   VOLATILE DISS. SOLIDS
                   TOTAL VOL. SUS. SOLIDS
                   AMMONIA NITROGEN
                   TOC

                   ACRYLONITRILE
                   BENZENE
                   CARBON TETRACHLQRIDE
                   CHLOROBENZENE
                    .2-OICHLOROETHANE
                    ,1,1-TRlCHLOROETHANE
                    HLOKOFORH
                    .1-OICHLOROETHYLENE
                    •2-TRANS-DICHLOROETHYLENE
                    i2-DICHLOROPROPANE
                   ETHYLBENZENE
                   HETMYLENE CHLORIDE
                   METHYL CHLORIDE
                   TRICHLOROFLUOROHETHANE
                   TETRACHLOROETIIYLENE
                   TOLUENE
                   TRICHLOROETHYLENE
                                2t4-OICHLOROPHENUL
                                PHENOL

                                BENZIDINE
                                2.4-DINITROTOLUENE
                                FLUORANTHENE
                                NAPHTHALENE
                                BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
            POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED HERE NEVER DETECTED
            L-LESS THANI    N-D  NOT DETECTED!
            PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY	TO BE VERIFIED
             ACID EXTRACT
BASE-NEUTRALS
UNITS
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
UG/t
HG/L
MG/t
ML/L
MG/L
MG/L
Mt/L
HG/L
HG/l
U&/L
UG/l
UG/t
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
INFlUtNT
261
190
573
31
21
791
632
16
323
123
156
7
222
t 100
9
10
L 5
I 5
74
27
13
5
0
23
2058
7
L 5
25
73
73
0
6
I 20
1
L 20
1
10








L





L

L
L
L


L
L
L
L


L



I
L
L
L
L
L

SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
13
9
61
9
7
502
506
1
104
68
6
5
50
too
3
5
5
5
1
12
5
5
5
5
46
20
5
0
1
0
50
60
20
20
20
20
83
PCNT
REM.
95
95
89
71
67
37
20
9*
68
45
96
29
77

6?
lo


99
56
62


78
98


100
99
100







OTHER
INFLUENT
261
511
3233
40
35
1263
528
28
577
NOT RUN
389
18
300
14
3
2
1
11
L 5
2
L 5
L 5
L 5
1
10
0
I 5
13
120
7
4
6
L 20
0
L 20
L 20
9
COMBINED
SLUOGE
1068B
64525
43920
1608
304
38072
NOT RUN
917
20283
NOT RUN
37286
66
10145
N-D
N-0
N-D
N-0
N-O
N-0
N-0
N-0
49
N-0
303
124
N-D
9
N-0
26857
N-D
N-0
1528
N-0
N-0
14
N-D
2687
SECONDARY
-SLUOGt
2/60
11616
11462
397
83
8922
NOT RUN
633
5249
.NOT RUN
9072
22
1709
N-D
0
N-0
N-D
N-0
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-0
N-&
1
0
N-D
N-0
N-0
1952
N-0
N-0
387
1
N-D
N-D
N-D
1268

-------
                                                                 SUMMARY OF  ANALYTICAL  DATA

                                                                          PLANT   H
             fHACIION
              1>ASE-NEUTRALS
             PESTICIDES

             MtlALS
H-
CD
              NON-CONV.  METALS
PAHAHtTER

BUTYL BEN2YL PHTHALATE
OI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
D1ETMYL PHTHALATE
ANTHRACENE
PHENANIHRENE
PYRENE

4,4'-UDI

ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUM
CAOHIUH
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
THALLIUM
I INC

AL UH INUM
BARIUM
UUHON
CALCIUM
COBALT
IRON
MACNESIUM
MANGANESE
HULYBOENUM
SODIUM
TIN
TITANIUM
VANADIUM
¥ UK I UH
UMTS
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
NC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
NC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
MC/L
UC/L
UC/L
HC/L
UC/L
UC/L
MC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
SECONDARY PCNT
INHUtuT EFFLUENT REM.
1
10
1
1
0
I 10
L 1000
5
4
L I
L 2
155
291
337
7
333
394
6
7
1
799
1507
112
571
58
103
5043
16
231
57
91
79
176
9
4
L 20
3
L 20
L 20
L 20
L 10
L 1000
2
1
0
L 2
19
29
160
11
L 1000
266
L 2
0
L 1
90
213
15
368
54
124
427
15
163
31
66
36
22
7
4

70





60
IS


68
90
53


32
67
100

89
86
87
36
7

92
6
29
46
3
54
68
22

OTHtfc COMBINED
INFLUENT SLUOCE
I 20
3
0
I 20
L 20
I 10
200
9
27
1
6
1138
669
596
416
2667
546
5
219
3
2633
11236
643
639
60
67
30683
19
674
103
70
187
601
25
9
N-0
12
N-0
34
34
41
N-0
138
107
L 6
297
32950
32267
41783
7250
33633
3056)
14
243
2
149833
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
SECONDARY
SLUOCE
N-0
N-0
N-0
N-0
N-0
28
N-0
80
36
L 6
26
3650
1550
883
1817
21500
3750
7
119
L 10
20417
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT HUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT HUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
            HlllUJIAIIIi NUT LISTED  MERE  NEVER  UEIECILD
            L-LESS  IIIANI    N-0  1401  OL1ECIEUI
            PKtLlHINAMY UAIA UNLIT	10  BE  VlKIFUU

-------
                                                       MABB BALANCE IN LB8. PER DAY

                                                                 PLANT  14
            FRACTION
            CONVENTIONALB
            NON-CONVENTIONAL8
            VOLATILE3
CD
 A
PARAMETER

BOD
TOTAL SUSP, SOLIDS
COD
OIL I GREASE

TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS
TOTAL DISS. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDS
VOLATILE DISS. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOL. BUS. SOLIDS
AHHONIA NITROGEN
TOC

BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
1•1•I-TRICHLOROETHANE
CHLOROFORM
1r1-DtCHLOROETHYLENE
1.2-TRANS-DICHLOROETHYLEME
I.2-DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYLBENZENE
HETHYLENE CHLORIDE
METHYL CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROFLUOROHETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE

2,4-DlCHLOROPHENOL
PHENOL

2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
FLUORANTHENE
NAPHTHALENE
BI8(2-ETHYLHEXYL> PHTHALATE
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
ANTHRACENE
PHENANTHRENE
PYRENE

ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
           SECONDARY SLUDGE IS NOT INCLUDED IN TOTAL OUT COLUMN
           POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED
           L-LESS THANI  N-D  NOT DETECTED!
           PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY	TO BE VERIFIED
            ACID EXTRACT


            BASE-NEUTRAL8
            METALS
INFLUENT
24214
17724
53470
2072
2.0
73813
58743
30088
11307
H537
484
20481
t
t
4.
2.
t.
.
t 0.
2.
172
.4
N-D
2.3
4.8
4.8
L 0.1
.5
L 0.1
N-D
L 0.1
.7
L 0.1
.7
L 0.1
t 0.1
L 0.1
N-D
.5
.4
N-D
N-D
14.5
27.1
31.4
.7
TOTAL OUT
8344
43854
34728
2014
.8
72174
-
23235
-
25407
554
11457
.3
N-D
L 0.1
1.1
N-D
I 0.1
N-D
.2
4.4
1.7
L 0.1
L 0.1
18.0
1 0.1
N-D
1.0
N-D
L 0.1
N-D
7.5
N-D
.3
N-D
L 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
.3
.2
L 0.1
.2
23.8
24.2
42.7
5.8
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
1244
ess
5440
807
.4
44803
47177
7718
4277
540
478
4474
.3
N-D
L 0,1
1.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
4.3
1.7
N-D
L 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
7,7
N-D
.3
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
.2
L 0,1
L 0.1
N-D
1.8
2.7
14.7
1.0
CONFINED
SLUDGE
7122
42797
27248
1205
.2
25371
NOT RUN
13517
NOT RUN
24847
57.5
4741
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
1 0.1
N-D
.2
L 0.1
N-D
I 0.1
N-D
17.7
N-D
N-D
1.0
N-D
I 0.1
N-D
1.8
N-D
I 0.1
N-D
L 0.
I 0.
1 0.
L 0.
L 0.
N-D
.2
22.0
21.5
27.8
4.8
SECONDARY
SLUDGE

22771
74740
75480
3304

    ,7
74323
NOT RUN
43724
NOT RUN
75571
180
14234

L  0.1
   N-D
   N-D
   H-D
   N-D
   N-D
   0.1
   0.1
   N-D
   N-D
   N-D
  14.3
   N-D
   N-D
   3.2

   N-D
   N-D
   N-D
  10.4
   N-D
   N-D
   N-D
   N-D
   N-D
     .2

     ,7
     .3
   N-D
     .2
  30.4
  12.7
   7.4
  15.1

-------
                                                       MASS  BALANCE  IN  LB9. PER  t'AY
                                                                 PLANT   14
            METALS
            NON-CONU. HETALS
PARAMETER

MERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
THALLIUM
ZINC

ALUMINUM
BARIUM
BORON
CALCIUM
COBALT
IRON
MAGNESIUM
HANOANE6C
MOLYBDENUM
SODIUM
TIN
TITANIUM
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
INFLUENT
L 0.1
34.7
.4
.7
L O.I
74.3
141
10.3
93.1
3411
9.4
471
1442
21.3
3.3
B303
7.3
14.4
.a
.4
TOTAL OUT
L 0.1
4S.2
.6
.2
L O.I
ioa
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
N-D
24.8
N-D
L 0.1
N-0
B.4
19.9
1.4
34.3
304?
11.3
39.9
1348
13.2
2.9
8143
3.4
2.1
.7
.3
COMBINED
SLUDGE
I 0,1
20.4
I 0.1
.2
L 0.1
99. a
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
SECONDARY
SLUDGE

    .2
  31.2
I  O.I
   1.0
   N-D
170

NOT RUM
NOT RUN
HOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
03
A
    CJ
           btCOMDAKV SLUbOE IS NOT  I MCI DUE [I  IN  TOIAL  OUT  COLUMN
           I-IHIUIAHIS HOI LISTED WERE  NOT DETECTED
           1 -LESS I It AH I  N-D  HOI DETECTED!
           PttELIMINARY DATA ONLY	TO  BE VERIFIED

-------
                                         PERCENT  OCCURRENCE OF  POLLUTANT PARAMETERS

                                                          PLANT 14
§
 PARAMETER

 1.1 > 1-TRICIILOROETHANE
 CHLOROFORM
 11 2-TRAMS-DICHLOROETHYLENE
 TETRACHLOROETHYLCNE
 BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYLf PHTHALATE
 ANTIMONY
 ARSENIC
 CHROMIUM
 COPPER
 CYANIDE
 NICKEL
 SILVER
 ZINC
 HETHYLENE CHLORIDE
 TOLUENE
 PHENOL
 ETHYLDENZENE
 TRICIILOROETIIYLENE
 DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
 BENZENE
 t.l-DICHLOROETHYLENE
 DIETHYL PHTHALATE
 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
 1.2-DICHLOROPROPAHE
 METHYL CHLORIDE
 2.4-DICHLOROPHENOL
 2i4-D1NITROTOLUENE
NAPHTHALENE
 BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
 ANTHRACENE
PHENANTHRENE
LEAD
MERCURY
SELENIUM
 THALLIUM
ACRYLONITRILE
CHLOROBENZENE
 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
DICHLOROBROHOHETHANE
TRICHLOROFLUOROHETHANE
FLUORANTHENE
PYRENE
 4r1'-DDT
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
INFL-
UENT
.100
100
100
100
100
100
too
too
too
100
100
100
100
83
S3
93
47
47
47
sa
30
33
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
OTHER
INFL.
4) 0
4) 47
4> 0
4) 100
4) BO
4) 100
At 100
4>. 100
4> 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
i> 100
4> 47
4) 100
4) 100
4) SO
4) 33
4) BO
4> SO
4) 0
4) 20
4) 33
4) 0
4) 17
6) 17
4) 20
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 100
6) 100
4) 17
4) 1?
4) 17
4) 17
4» 17
4> 0
4) 0
4) 0
41 0
4) 17
4) 47
4) 83
SEC.
EFFL.
4> 17
4) 100
4) 0
4> 33
3) 100
4) 100
4) 33
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
4> 100
4) 33
4) 100
4) 47
4) SO
4> 0
4) 0
4> 33
3) 40
4> 63
4) 0
S) 0
4) 0
4> 0
4) 17
4) 0
S) 0
S> 0
S) 0
S> 0
S) 0
4) 17
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
S) 0
S) 0
4> 0
4) 17
4) 0
CllHB.
sum
( 4> 0
1 4> 0
( 4> SO
4> 0
51 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) IOO
4) 100
4> 17
4> 100
3) 100
4> IOO
4) 0
3) 17
4) 0
4) 0
S) 6
4) 0
41 0
4> 0
3» 0
S> 0
9) 0
3) 0
S) 17
3) 17
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) 17
4) 0
4> 0
4> 0
4> 0
4) 17
S) 17
3) 33
4) 0
4) 0
4) 100
SEC.
BLDG
4> 0
4> 0
4> 0
4) 0
4) 100
4> IOO
4) 100
41 100
4> 100
4) 100
4) 10O
4) 100
4) 100
4) 17
4) 100
4) 47
4) 33
41 0
4) 0
4) 17
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4> 100
4> 100
4) 83
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 17
4) 0
4) 0
4) 100
TAP
WATER
4) 0 <
4) 100
4> 0
4) 0
4) 100
4) 100
4) 0
4) 100
4> 100
4) 0
4> 0
4> 0
4> 100
4) 0
4) 100
4) 0
4> 0
4) 0
4) IOO
4) IOO
4> 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4> 100
4) 0
4> 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 100
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
4) 0
4) 0


1 )
1)
1 >
1>
1)
1)
1>
1)
1)
>
1)
11
1)
1>
1)
1)
1)
1>
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
I)
l>
1>
t>
1)
1)
1)
1)
1>
1)
1)
1)
1>
1)
1>
1)
1)
1>
1)
( 1)
< 1)
( 1)
             POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED AT ANY SAMPLE POINT
             UNCONFIRMED PESTICIDES WERE ASSUMED NOT DETECTED
             NUMBERS IN PARENTHESES ARE THE NUMBER OF SAMPLES  TAKEN
             PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY-TO  BE VERIFIED

-------
                                                           SUHMAKY Of ANALYTICAL GAIA

                                                                    PLANT  1!>
              CONVENT lllNALS
              NON-CONVENTIONALS
              VOLATILE*
O
              ACID EXIKACI
              BASE-NEUTRALS
PARAMETER

BOO
TOTAL  SUSP.  SOLIDS
COO
OIL I  CREASE

TOTAL  PHENOLS
TOTAL  SOLIDS
TOTAL  01SS.  SJLias
SEITLtAfiLE  SOLIUS
TOTAL  VOLATILc  SJLIOi
VOLATILE UISS.  SOLIDS
TOTAL  VOL.  SUS.  SOLIbS
AMMONIA NITROGEN
TOC

BENIENE
l,<>-DICriLUKUETHAi4t-
1.1,1-THICHLUrfOLIHAKE
1. 1-OICHLOROE IHANt
CHLOROFORM
1 il-OICliLUHUt IHYLt-Nt
l,2-TRANS-UIC,U_OI
-------
                                             SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL  DA IA

                                                      FLANT  15
 FRACMON

 BASE-NEU1RALS


 PESTICIDES
 METALS
o
A
 NON-CONV. METALS
PARAMETER

PHENANTHRENE
PVRENE

OIELORIU
IIEPTACHLOR
CAHHA-BHC
PCB-1242
PCB-125*

ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
ZINC

ALUMINUM
BARIUM
CALCIUM
IRON
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
SODIUM
LH1IS
UC/L
UC/L
t.O/L
NC/L
NC/L
NG/L
M./L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
liC/L
UO/L
LG/L
UC/L
UC/L
NC/L
UC/L
UC/L
tC/L
UC/L
LC/L
UG/L
MC/L
UC/L
MG/L
UC/L
MC/L
INFLOUNI
I 3
L 3
7
L 200
27
4133
L 3600
L 50
L 50
L 2
1
9
56
125
9
463
96
L 50
11
145
569
104
47
732
6
67
39
I
t
I




I
I
t
L
I


L
L

L









SECONDARY KCNT
EFFLUENT RtH.
3
3
150
5
43
817
03
50
50
2
2
5
25
6>0
20
200
13
50
t
36
111
32
49
252
7
60
37





80





44
57


59
86

32
75
00
69

66

Jl
5
Uliltf
INFLUENT
L 3
L 3
L 330
20
67
9708
75
L 50
L 50
I 2
I 2
23
b4
147
15
417
2
L 50
11
343
615
bO
45
619
7
90
46
CtMIMNED
SLUUCL
68
2H7
H-li
N-0
N-0
N-0
H-D
2
-------
            FRACTION

            COHVtHfIOHALS
            NON-CONVENTIONAL8
            VOLATILE8
to
o
CO
/\
            ACID  EXTRACT


            BASE-NEUTRALS
            PESTICIDES
PARAMETER

BOD
TOTAL SUSP. SOLIDS
COD
OIL I GREASE

TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS
TOTAL DI8S. SOLIDS
TOTAL OOLAIILE SOLIDS
VOLATILE DI68. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOL. 8US. SOLIDS
ANMONIA NITROGEN
TOC

BENZENE
 •2-DICHLOROETHANE
 >ItI-TRICHLOROETHANE
 ,I-DICHLOKOETMANE
 HLOROFORH
 t1-DICHLOROETHYLENE
 t2-TRAN8-DICHLOROETHYLENE
 r2-DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYLBENZENE
NETNYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE

PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENOL
HEXACHLOfcOBENZENE
Fl UORANTHENE
BI8<2-ETHYLIIEXYL> PHTHALATE
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-6UTYL PHTHALATE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
11.12-BENZOFLUORANTHENE
ANTHRACENE
PHENANTHRENE
PYRENE

DIEIDRIN
KEPT ACM OR
GAHMA-BHC
PCB-1242
FCU-1254

AN IIhONY
ANSENIC
MASS BALANCE IN LBS. PER DAY
PLANT IS
INFLUENT TOTAL OUT
6303
7199
13812
1944
3524
14234
13400
732
1 .8 2.
24930
12308
6340
3782
4931
374
8980
t
I 0.
3.
L 0.
,
L 0.
HE L 0.
L 0.

,
N-
(
.
•
t
•
24788
-
11143
-
9392
407
4473
I 0.




4







1
N-0
,
L 0.
L 0.
1
1
1
N-0
I 0.
1
N-D
L 0.
*
1
1
N-0
•
,
L 0.
1
1
1
N-D
N-
N-D L 0.
N-l
ATE .1
.
> 1 0.
» 1.
t 0,
.3
.2 L 0.
N-D 1 0,
N-D 1 0.
N-D L 0.
N-D 1 0.
L 0.
N-
N-D L 0.
t 0.
L 0.
.2 L 0.
N-D 1 0.
N-D L 0.
N-D
D
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
D
1
1
1
1
1
1
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
344
1442
3242
201
2.4
19787
13822
4813
1297
840
402
3490
N-D
N-D
.1
N-D
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
.1
N-D
, |
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
.3
N-D
L 0.1
I 0.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
I O.I
I O.I
L O.I
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
COMBINED
SLUDGE
2938
14772
10138
331
L 0.1
7001
NOT RUN
4328
NOT RUN
8332
4.3
983
L O.I
N-D
N-D
L O.I
N-D
N-D
I 0.1
N-D
L 0.
I 0.
N-
L 0.
.
L 0.
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
I 0.1
i
L 0.
L 0.
N-
L 0.
L 0.
L 0.
L 0.
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
.1
OTHER
INFLUENT

2333
4371
9042
927

   2.4
14009
9444
5723
3221
3174
313
SOU
   N-D
   N-0
     .1
   N-0
     .2
   N-D
   0.1
   N-D
   O.I
     .3
   0.1
   O.I
   N-D
   O.I
   0.1
   0.1

   N-D
   N-D
     .4
   0,1
     .1
     .2
   N-D
   N-D
   N-D
   N-D

   N-D
   0.1
   O.I
     .3
    0.1

    N-D
    N-D
           OIIIER INFLUENT  IS NOT  INCLUDED IN TOTAL  OUT  COLUMN
           POILUFANIS NOT  LISTED  UERE  NOT DETECTED
           1  ItSS THAN*  N-D  NOT  DETECTED*
           PKEI IHINARY DATA ONLY	TO  BE  VERIFIED

-------
 FRACTION
 HETALS
                                            NABS DALANCE IN LB8.  PER DAY

                                                      PLANT  IS
 NON-CONV. HETALS
PARAHETER

BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
ZINC

ALUMINUM
BARIUM
CALCIUM
IRON
HAONEBIUN
HANOANE3E
BODIUM
INFLUENT
N-D
I 0.1
.3
3.2
4.B
.3
I O.I
3.2
N-D
.4
7,9
31.2
S.7
234?
40.1
347
4.B
2138
TOTAL OUT
L 0.1
L 0.1
1.3
S.S
33.4
1.7
L 0.1
1.4
L 0.1
L 0.1
17.2
_
-
-
-
-
-
-
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
N-B
N-0
N-D
1.3
23. B
N-D
N-D
.0
N-D
N-D
2.0
6.6
l.B
2814
12.7
304
2. A
1973
COMBINED
SLUDOE
L 0.1
I 0.1
1.3
4.2
7.6
1.7
t O.I
.4
L 0.1
L 0.1
15.2
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
OTHER
INFLUENT
                                                                                                              N-D
                                                                                                              N-D
                                                                                                                .4
                                                                                                              1.7
                                                                                                              4.0
                                                                                                                .4
                                                                                                              0.1
                                                                                                              0.1
                                                                                                              N-D
                                                                                                                .3
                                                                                                              9.4
                                                                                                              14.8
                                                                                                               1.4
                                                                                                            1238
                                                                                                              17.0
                                                                                                            192
                                                                                                               2.S
                                                                                                            1243
OTHER INFLUENT IS NOT INCLUDED IN TOTAL OUT COLUMN
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED
L-LEBS THAN*  N-D  NOT DETECTEDI
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY	TO BE VERIFIED

-------
                                  PERCENT  OCCURRENCE Of POLLUTANT  PARAMETERS

                                                    PLANT  IS
O
en
A
 PARAME1ER

DENZENE
1.1iI-TRICHLOROETHANE
UILOKOFORM
MtTHVLENE CHLORIDE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHt OKOEtlirLENE
b!6<2 ETHYLHEXYL)  PHTHALATE
DI-N-bUTYL PIITHALATE
DIETHYL PIITHALATE
COPPER
CYANIDE
HILUER
ZINC
BUTYL BENZYL  PHTHALATE
CHROMIUM
MERCURY
NICKEL
EMIYLbENZENE
PENTACULOROPHEMOL
PHENOL
PCfi-1242
  2-1RANB-DICHLOROETHYLENE
  1 -bICHLOROETHANE
 EAb
  2-DICIILOROETMANE
  1 -DICIILOROETHYLENE
  2-DICHLOROPROPANE
OIELDRIN
GAHHA-bHC
CAt'HIUH
11CHLOKUDROMOHE THANE
IRICHI OKOFlUQROMETHANE
IIEXACHI OROBENZCNE
H UURANTHENE
II.12-BENZOFLUORANTHENE
ANIHRACENE
PHENANIHRENC
PYKENE
IIEPTACIILOR
PCb-1234
AN1IMONY
A I. tit MIC
btKVI I IUM
btl LIIIIIH
INFL-
UENT
100
100
100
100
100
too
100
100
100
too
100
too
100
100
83
81
61
ei
47
67
47
47
30
11
11
17
17
17
17
17
17
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0


4>
6)
6)
6)
6)
41
4>
4)
4)
4)
4>
3>
4)
4)
4>
4>
4)
4)
4»
4)
4>
4)
4»
4>
4>
4>
4)
4>
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
41
OTHER
I NFL.
0
too
100
ei
100
0
100
100
100
100
100
100
47
100
81
too
100
17
SO
17
so
81
13
0
11
0
0
0
0
17
0
0
SO
0
0
Q
0
0
0
17
17
0
0
0
0


4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
3)
4>
4>
4)
4>
4)
4>
4)
4)
4>
41
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
SEC.
£FFL
0
47
81
100
100
SO
0
too
81
17
100
100
11
too
0
0
0
81
0
0
17
31
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
31
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
17
0
0
0
0


4>
4>
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
S)
4)
4)
4)
4»
4>
4)
4>
4>
4>
4>
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
41
4>
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
cone.
SLOG
too
0
0
100
so
100
100
100
100
0
100
100
100
itoo
100
100
100
100
too
0
0
0 \
73 ]
75
100
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
23
73
23
SO
50
73
0
0
100
100
25
100


4>
4>
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
3>
2>
3>
4>
4>
1>
4)
11
4)
4)
4>
4)
! 4)
1 4)
I 4)
[ 4>
4»
1 4)
4)
4>
3>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4>
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
TAP
HATER
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
0
0









0
0
0
0
too
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0


1 )
t>
1)
1 )
1)
1 )
< 1>
< 1)
< 1)
< 1)
< 1)
< 1
< 11
< 1)
( 1)
< 1)
( 1)
< 1>
( 1>
< 1)
< 1 )
( 1)
( 1)
( 1)
< 1)
< 1)
< 1)
( 1>
< 1)
< 1)
( 1)
< 1)
< 1)
< »
< 1)
< u
< 1)
< I)
( 1)
( 1 )
( 1)
( 1)
( 1)
( 1)
< 1 )
            KMllMANIfl NOT LISTEli  ULfiE  NOT DETECTED AT  ANY  SAMPLE P01NI
            UNCONMKHEb PEbTICIDES UERE ASSUMED NOT DElELTtD
            NL'MDEKS IN PARENTHESES ARE  THE NUMbEK OF SAMPLES  TAKEN
            PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY-TO  bE VERIFIED

-------
                                                      SUMMARY  Or ANALYTICAL DATA

                                                               PLANT   16
01
O
FRACTION    PARAMETER

CONV..      POD
            TOTAL SUSP.  SOLIDS
            COD
            OIL  I GREASE

NON-CONV.   TOTAL PHENOLS
            TOTAL SOLIDS
            TOTAL DISS.  SOLIDS
            SETTLEABLE SOLIDS
            TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDS
            VOLATILE PISS. SOLIDS
            TOTAL VOL. SUS, SOLIDS
            AMMONIA NITROGEN
            TOC

VOLATILES   BENZENE
            CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
            CHLOROBENZENE
            1»2-D1CHLOROETHANE
            Irlri-TRICHLOROETHANE
            It1-DIGMLOROETHANE
            lil.2-TRICHLOROETHANE
            IiI,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
            CHLOROFORM
            i•\-DICHLOROETHYLENE
            lf2-TRANS-DICHLOROETHYt.ENE
            1r 2-DICHLOROPROPANE
           ETHYLBENZENE
           METHYLENE CHLORIDE
           METHYL BROMIDE
           DICHLOROBROHOMETHANE
           TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
           TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
           TOLUENE
           TRICHLOROETHYLENE
           VINYL CHLORIDE

ACIDS.     2.4.4-TRICHLOROPHENOL
           2.4-DICHLOROPHENOL
           2»4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
           PENTACHLOROF'HENOL
           PHENOL

BASE-NEUT. 1>2-DICHLOROBENZENE
           Ir3-D ICHLOROBENZENE
           1.4-DICHLOR08ENZENE
           FLUORANTHENE
           NAPHTHALENE
           BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
            BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE

POLLUTANTS  NOT LISTED MERE NEWER DETECTED
L-LESS THAN!    N-D  NOT DETECTED!
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY	TO BE VERIFIED
UNITS
MO/L
MO/L
MO/L
HG/L
UO/L
MO/L
MO/L
ML/L
MO/L
MO/L
MO/L
HO/L
MO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L
UO/L










L




L

t.

I


L

L



L
L

L



L

L



INFLUENT
214
217
553
41
34
734
481
12
284
47
144
17
84
i
2
1
0
21
0
0
10
37
1
1
1
t
38
20
0
1
44
33
13
20
2
1
2
3
32
18
3
3
3
1
28
4


L





L


L

t
I


L
L
L


L

L



L
L
L




L
L
L
L

L
SECONDARY FCNT
EFFLUENT REM.
11
14
121
4
IS
470
430
1
43
48
It)
9
21
1
28
0
1
0



0




S
20
0
1
2
1
2
20
2
2
0
1
1
2
3
?
3
2
7
2
95
?3
78
85
SB
34
4
92
7fr

94
47
75




100



23



83
87



94
97
85




47
97
89




75
50
OTHER
INFLUENT
282
198
447
34
40
714
531
8
315
77
132
12
144
i
377
t 1
0
52
3
L t
L 10
41
0
9
L 1
51
92
7
0
3
138
131
171
11
2
1
9
17
103
80
17
37
L 3
47
44
5


L





I


L

L



L
L
L


L
L
L



L
L
L
L

L

L
L
L
L

L
TERTIARY COMB.
EFFLUENT SLUDGE
11
4
43
12
11
424
445
t
109
50
3
9
19






0
0
7
1
1
1
0
5
20
1
1
1
0
1
20
2
2
2
4
1
2
3
3
3
2
4
2
150BI
54474
50400
3400
144
31591
NOT RUN
983
24479
NOT RUN
43583
120
2771
4
N-D
3
N-D
N-D
35
N-D
N-D
1
N-D
305
1
77
77
N-D
N-D
N-D
12
117
240
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N^D
N-D
N-D
ISO
1217
48
238
2317
355
COHP.
SLUDGE -2
21041
42112
84800
4933
393
44287
NOT RUN
997
34381
NOT RUN
51147
43
3833
14
N-D
7
N-D
N-D
598
N-D
N-D
4
N-D
733
4
412
111
N-D
N-D
N-D
241
418
1927
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
92
N-D
N-D
3727
203
3100
3150
577

-------
                                                        LUMHAfiV OF ANALVTICAI

                                                                 PLANT   14
         KACF ION   f ARAHE UK
                   DI-N-IlUIYL FIITHAl ATE
                   BIETHYL  FMIIIAl ATC
                   1 . 2-&EN2AF4FHRACENE
                   6ENZO  5
N-D
05
82
85
283
283
89
N-D
N-D
N-D
240
218
10
2627
19883
22533
36417
27490
75667
530?
28162
1373
43667
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
       lOHLIIANTS NOT LISTED  HERE  NEVER DETECTED
       L LESS  THAN)     HI'  NOT  DETECTED!
       f KELIMINARY DATA ONLY	TO  E
-------
                                                       MASS BALANCE IN LB8. PER PAY

                                                                PLANT  14
A
            PARAMETER

            OOP
            TOTAL SUSP.
            COD
            OIL I GREASE
            SOLIDS
TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS
TOTAL DISS. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDS
VOLATILE DISS. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOL. 8U9. SOLIDS
AMMONIA HITROOEH
TOC

BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLOR1DE
CHLOROBENZEHE
 ,2-DICHLOROETHANE
 .t.1-TRICHLORUETHAHE
 .1-DICHLORDETHAHE
 rIt2-TRICHLOROETHAHE
 ,1.2r2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
 HLOROFORH
 rl-DICHLOROETHYLEHE
 r2-TRANB-DICHLOROETHYLENE
 r2-DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYLBEHZEHE
METHYLEHE CHLORIDE
METHYL BROHIDE
DICIILOROBROHOHE THAHE
TRICHLOROFLUORUHE THAHE
TETRACHLOROETHYLEHE
TOLUEHE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
VINYL CHLORIDE
            2•4.4-TRICHLOROPHENOL
            2t4-DICHLOROPHEHOL
            2>4-DIHETHYLPHEHOL
            PEHTACHLOROPHEHOL
            PHEHOL

            lr2-DICHLOROBENZENE
            1>3-DICHLOROBENZENE
            1> 4-DICHLORODENZEHE
            FLUORAHTHENE
            NAPHTHALEHE
            BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL> PHTHALATE
            BUTYL BEHZYL PHTHALATE
            DI-H-BUTYL PHTHALATE
            DIETHYL PHTHALATE
           POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED MERE NOT DETECTED
           L-LESS  THANI  N-D  NOT DETeCTEDI
           PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY	TO BE VERIFIED
INFLUENT
1
203243
205434
524703
30562
34.0
198234
434428
270728
44724
195040
14120
7933B
.9
1.4
M-D
.2
19.4
.2
.3
N-D
34.8
H-D
.9
N-D
5.8
34.3
N-D
.2
N-D
43.4
31.3
12.3
N-D
N-D
.8
N-D
2.8
29.9
14. B
N-D
2.5
N-D
.8
24.1
3.3
2.5
5.8
INFLUENT
2
73187
31224
172914
8489
10.4
185712
137814
81703
19929
39511
3134
37307
.3
97.7
N-D
L 0.1
13.4
.4
N-D
N-D
10.4
L Oil
2.2
N-D
13.1
23.9
1.7
L 0.1
1.2
35.8
33.9
44.3
2.9
.5
.3
2.4
4.4
24.4
20.4
4.3
9.4
N-D
12.1
11.9
1.2
2.9
1 .5
TDTAL IN
274430
254482
497419
47251
44.4
883944
594242
352431
44455
194551
19274
114445
1.2
99.1
N-D
.2
33.0
.8
.3
N-D
47.4
L O.I
3.1
N-D
18.7
40.2
1.7
.2
1.2
79.4
45.2
54.4
2.9
.5
1.1
2.4
7.2
54.5
37.4
4.3
12.1
N-D
12.9
38.0
4.5
5.4
7.3
TOTAL OUT
44770
149371
242432
25944
13.7
417095
-
213834
-
134493
10935
31728
L 0.1
.8
.2
N-D
.4
.8
.2
.4
8.1
N-D
1.4
L 0.1
1.0
4.0
H-D
N-D
H-D
1.5
1.1
3.4
N-D
H-D
N-D
N-D
4.8
.1
1.8
.2
4.4
.4
4.3
11.8
1.3
1.7
N-D
TERTIARY
EFFLUENT
13284
3032
74483
14089
13.0
511433
537394
132034
40583
3422
10447
22542
N-D
.8
.2
H-D
.4
N-D
.2
.4
8.1
N-D
N-D
H-D
.4
5.8
N-D
H-D
H-D
1.2
.4
.4
H-D
H-D
H-D
H-D
4.8
H-D
1.8
H-D
H-D
H-D
H-D
4,2
H-D
.4
N-D
COMBINED
SLUDGE
25144
84437
79844
5705
.2
50059
NOT RUN
38789
NOT RUN
49042
190
4391
L 0.1
N-D
L 0.1
H-D
H-D
I 0.1
H-D
H-D
L 0.1
H-D
.5
L 0.1
.1
.1
H-D
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
.2
.4
N-D
H-D
N-D
H-D
H-D
H-D
H-D
.2
1.9
L 0.1
.4
3.7
.4
.3
M-D
COMBINED
SLUDGE 2
24322
77702
104093
4172
.5
55403
NOT RUN
43011
NOT RUN
44009
78,4
4795
t 0.1
H-D
I 0.1
H-D
N-D
,7
H-D
N-D
L 0.1
N-D
.9
t 0.1
.5
.1
N-D
H-D
H-D
.3
.5
2.4
H-D
H-D
H-D
H-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
4.7
.3
3.9
3.9
.7
1.0
) N-D

-------
                                                         nflbi VALANCE  IN LtB. PER  DAY
                                                                  PLANT
o
05
A
PARAMETER

I'2-BENZAHTIIRACENE
BEM20  (A)PYRENE
CIIRYSCNE
ANTHRACENE
PMENANTIIRENE
PYRENE

4.4--DOD
ALPHA-BMC
OAHMA-BMC

ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
2INC

ALUMINUM
BARIUM
CALCIUM
IRON
MAGNESIUM
HANOANE8E
UODIUH
INFLUENT
1
N-0
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-0
L O.I
L O.I
M-D
24.6
N-D
4.4
37. a
124
249
108
.4
72.4
N-D
4.8
203
1301
138
308IQ
1221
3931
44.8
83131
INFLUENT
2
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
L O.I
N-D
N-D
N-B
N-D
7.1
44.2
47.4
79.4
34.2
.4
24.0
N-0
17.8
89.2
210
30.4
9440
432
1297
14.7
18414
TOTAL IN
N-0
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-0
N-D
.1
1. 0,1
M-D
24.8
M-D
11.9
122
172
349
144
1.0
94.4
N-D
24.4
292
1311
189
40438
1439
3248
41.9
101947
TOTAL OUT
. 1
.1

.7
.7
.2
L 0. 1
L O.I
.2
.8
1.7
L O.I
4.2
34.9
91.4
230
83.0
.4
74.3
39.4
1.9
123
_
-
-
.
-
-
-
TEKIIAKY
EFFLUENT
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
L O.I
I 0.1
.2
N-D
N-D
M-D
N-D
23.8
4.0
172
4.8
.2
49.4
N-D
M-D
37.2
18.9
12.9
19429
132
4831
38.2
98421
COMDINED
SLUDGE
L 0.1
N-D
L 0.1
.3
.1
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
.9
1.4
L O.I
.9
7.8
17.2
32.4
41.8
L O.I
4.1
.2
.2
30.9
NOT RUN
HOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUM
NOT RUM
MOT RUN
COMBINED
SLUDGE 2
.1
N-D
. I
.4
.4
, 1
M-0
N-D
N-D
.1
.3
L O.I
1.3
24.9
28.2
49.4
34.4
t. 0.1
4.4
39.2
1.7
94.4
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUM
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
           POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED UERE NOT DETECTED
           L tESS  THAN!   N-D  NOT DETECTED!
           PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY	TO bE i/EKIFIED

-------
                                 PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF POLLUTANT PARAMETERS

                                                  PLANT 16
  PARAMETER

 If If1-TRICHLOROETHANE
 CHLOROFORM
 METHYLENE CHLORIDE
 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
 TOLUENE
 TRICHLOROETHYLENE
 BI8<2-ETHYLHEXYL> PHTHALATE
 DIETHYL PHTHALATE
 CADHIUH
 CHROMIUM
 COPPER
 CYANIDE
 LEAD
 MERCURY
 NICKEL
 SILVER
 ZINC
 BENZENE
 ETHYLBENZENE
 J.2-TRAN8-DICHLOROETHYLENE
 PHENOL
 1.2-DICHLOROBENZENE
 BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
 DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
 NAPHTHALENE
 8AMHA-BHC
 ARSENIC
 1f2-PICHLOROETHANE
 It1-DICHLOROETHANE
 1>1r2-TR1CHLOROETHANE
 DICHLOROBROHOHETHANE
 2f4-DICHLOROPHENOL
 PENTACHLOROPHENOL
 1f 4-DICHLOROBENZENE
 ALPHA-BHC
 CHLOROBENZENE
 1r1t2t 2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
 It1-D1CHLOROETHYLENE
 1f2-BICHLOROPROPANE
 METHYL BROMIDE
 TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
 CHLORODIBROHOMETHANE
 VINYL  CHLORIDE
 2f4r6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
 2f4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
 1r 3-DICHLOROBENZENE
 FLUORANTHENE
 1f 2-BENZANTHRACENE
 BENZO (A)PYRENE
 CHRY8ENE
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED
UNCONFIRMED PESTICIDES HERE ASSUMED NOT
NUMBERS IN PARENTHESES ARE THE NUMDER OF
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY-TO BE VERIFIED
JNFL- OTHER SEC. TERT. COMB. COMB, TAP
UEMT INFL. EFFL EFFL, BLPB SLDG-2 MATER
100
100
100
100
100
too
too
100
100
100
100
100
100
too
100
100
too
83
B3
67
47
67
67
SO
33
33
33
33
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
0
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4> 67
4) 10O
4) 100
4) 100
4) 83
4> 100
4> 100
4) 10O
At 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
6) 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) 47
4) 100
4) 47
4) 100
4> 100
4) 100
4> B3
4) 67
6> 100
6) 0
4) 0
6) 17
6) 100
6> 0
6) 17
6) 17
6> 67
6) 67
6) 17
6) 0
4) 0
6) 33
6) 0
6) 33
6> 67
4) 0
6) 33
6) SO
4) 17
6) SO
6) 0
6) 0
4) 0
6) 0
6> 17 ( 6) 33
6) 100 < 6) 50
4) 100
6) 10O
6) 83
6) 67
4) 100
4) 17
f > SO
4) 100
i) 100
») 10O
6) SO
6> 83
4) 100
4) 100
6) 100
4> 0
6) 33
6) 0
4) 17
6) 33
4) 0
6) 83
6) 100
6) 0
6) SO
6) 17
6) 0
6) 0
4> 0
6) 33
4) 0
6) 17
6) 0
6) 83
4) 17
6) 17
6) 0
6) 0
6) 0
4) 0
6) 0
6) 0
6> 0
4) 17
6) 0
6) 0
6) 0
4) 0
4) 100
6) SO
4) 33
4) 33
6> 50
6> 0
4> 0
6> 10O
6> 63
6) 100
6) 17
6) 100
6> 100
6) 0
4) 100
6> 0
4) 0(6) 0
6) 17 ( 4> 50
4) 100
4) SO
6) 83
6) 100
4) 100
6) 0
6) 100
6) 100
4) 100
6) 100
6> 100
6) 67
6> 100
6> 100
6> 100
6) 100
6) 33 < 6> 100
6) 0 < 6) 100
6) 0 ( 6» 0
6) 17
6) 0
6) 17
6) 17
6) 0
6) SO
4) 0
6) 0
6) 0
4> 17
4) 0
6) 0
6> 33
4) 0
6) 50
6) 17
4) 17
6) 0
6) 0
6> 0
6> 0
4) 0
6) 0
4) 0
6) 0
6) 0
6) 0
4) 0
6> 0
6) 0(6) 0
4) 0
4) 100
4) 100
6) 0
4) 83
6) 0
6) 100
4) 0
6) 100
4) 0
6) 0
6) 0
6) 0
4) 17
4) 0
6) 67
4) 0
6) 0
6> 17
6) 0
6) 0
6) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
6) 17
6) SO
4) 17
6) 0
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) 0
6) 100
4 > 1 00
41 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) 67
4) 100
6) 100
4) 10O
6) 100
4> 100
4> 100
4) SO
6) 0
4) 100
6) 100
4> f
4) 100
4) 0
4) 100
4) 0
4) 100
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
6) 0
4) SO
4) 0
4) SO
6) 0
4) 0
6) 33
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
6) 0
6> 0
6> 0
6) 0
4> 100
4) 83
6) 17
4) 17 < 4) 83
4) 0
6> 100
4) 0
6) 0
6) 0
6) 0
4) 0
6) 0
4) 0
6) 0
6) 0
6> 0
6) 0
4) 0
6) O
4) 0
6) 0
6) 0
6) 0
4) 0
6> 0
6) 0
6) 0
4) 0
6) 0
6) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
6) 0
4) 0
4) 100
6) 0
6) 0
6) 0
6> 0
6) 0
4) 0
6> 0
6) 0
6) 0
6) 0
6) 100
4> 0
6) 0
6> 0
6) 0
6) 0
6) 0
6> 0
6) 0
1)
1)
|
1
1
t









>
>
1)
i>
1)
)
>
)
)
1)
)
)
>
1)
1>
1)
1)
)
>
>
)
1)
1)
I)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)





>
)
CTED AT ANY 8AHPLE POINT
NOT DETECTED
ER OF SAMPLES TAKEN

-------
                                           f'ERCENJ OCCURRENCE  Of POLLUTANT PARArtETlRb
                                                             PLANT 14
          PARAMETER

         ANIIIRACCNE
         f HENANTHRENE
         IrKtNE
         H. « ' -flllll
         ANTIMONY
         BERYLLIUM
         SELENIUM
INFL-
UENT
0 (
0 I
0 (
0 (
0 (
0 (
0 (


4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
OTHER
INFL.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0


4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
SEC.
EFFL

  0
  0
  0
  0
  0
  0
  0
li)
4)
4)
                                                                          4)
1ERI
EFFL
0
0
0
17
0
0
0

.
< 4)
( 4)
( 4)
( 4>
( 4)
< 4)
< 4)
COMB.
SLOG
100
100
SO
0
100
47
eo


4)
4)
4)
4)
S>
4)
3)
COMb
Sl-liO-
100
too
83
0
too
so
too

T
4)
4)
4)
4>
5)
4)
3>
TAf
WAT
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
en
01
       HIIIIHANTS NOT LISIEb UEKE NOT  DETECTED AT AN*  SAMPLE POINT
       nm.ONf IfvMtti PESTICIDES WERE ASSUMED NOT I'EIECIED
       miHbt-'KS IN PARENTHESES ARE THE  NUMBER OF SAMPLES  TAKEN
       l-KELIMINAftr [(ATA  ONLY-TO b£ VERIFIED

-------
                                                      SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL DATA

                                                               PLANT  II
       FRACTION   PARAMETER

       CONY.      BOD
                  TOTAL  SUSP.  SOLIDS
                  COD
                  UIL C  GREASE

       NON-CONV.  TOTAL  PHENOLS
                  TOTAL  SOLIDS
                  TOTAL  DISS.  SOLIDS
                  SETTLEAULE SOLIDS
                  TOTAL  VOLATILE SOLIDS
                  VOLATILE DISS. SOLIDS
                  TOTAL  VOL. SUS. SOLIDS
                  AMMONIA NITROGEN
                  IOC

       VOLATILES  BENZENE
                  CARBON TETKACHLORIDE
                    .I.1-TRICHL010ETHANE
                    il-DICHLUROETHANE
tn                  ,1.2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
01                 HLUROFURH
                    i2-TRANS-DlCHLOROETHYLENE
                    ,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
                  ETHYLDENZENE
                  HETHYLENE CHLORIDE
                  METHYL CHLORIDE
                  DICHLORODIF LUOKOME THANE
                  TETRACHLOROETHYLENt
                  TOLUENE
                  TR1CHLOROETHYLENE

       ACIDS.     PENTACHLOROPHENOL
                  PHENOL

       BASE-NEUT. FLUORANTHENE
                  NAPHTHALENE
                  BISJ2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTMALAlE
                  BUTYL BENZYL PHIHALATE
                  DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
                  DIETHYL PHTHALATE
                  1,2-BEN/ANTHRACENE

       POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED HERE NEVER DETECTED
       L-LESS THANJ     N-0  NOT DETECTED!
       PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY---TO BE VERIFIED
UMTS
HG/L
HG/L
MG/L
HG/L
UG/L
HG/L
HG/L
ML/L
HG/L
Ht/L
HG/L
HG/L
HG/L
UG/L
UG/L I
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L I
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L L
UG/L I
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L L
IMLUINT
19*
129
77C
35
39
629
4t2
25
237
U'J
95
30
95
1
1
5*
1
1
2
3
1
31
22
25
20
124
7<
12
29
16
3
3
24
3
2
4
5








L





L
I

L
L

L
L
L

L
L


L


L
L

L

I
L
StCObDAKY
tFFLUtNT
13
9
127
21
22
441
444
1
ae
eo
t
IB
28









6
25
20
4
2
L
IB
1
3
2
9
2
3
3
5
PCNT
REM.
93
93
84
40
44
30
4
96
63
27
94
53
71


100



67

97
73


»7
97
92
38
94

33
63
33

25









L





L
L

L
L

L
L


I
I





L
L

I

L
L
OTHER
EFFLUENT
9
e
170
16
16
425
419
1
74
63
7
21
25
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
1
3
16
25
20
22
e
I
19
1
3
2
5
2
3
3
5
PRIMARY
SLUCGE
1695
1603
3320
152
66
2328
NOT RUN
97
1619
NOT RUN
1321
26
283
1
1
4
14
NTD
N-D
97
N-0
15
50
17
3
1
40
15
N-D
1B5
N-D
N-D
461
27
M-0
N-0
N-0
COMBINED
SLUDGE
45536
169167
64067
6817
448
55264
NOT RUN
1000
42101
NOT RUN
12V36J
108
4270
7
N-D
73
65
32
N-0
1620
79
307
479
N-D
47
14
517
20
177
63
169
707
5956
910
239
N-0
111
SECONDARY
SLUO&E
2819
3893
5687
488
173
3996
HOT RUN
913
2974
NOT RUN
3500
24
1179
0
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
51
N-0
21
1
N-D
5
N-D
833
2
N-D
580
N-0
112
1395
N-D
7
N-D
N-0

-------
                                                             SUHKAkY Of  ANALYTICAL  UAlA

                                                                      PLANT   17
             I-RACIIUN   PARAMEUK

             BASE-NEUI.
                         ANIHMACLhE
                         PHLNANTHKENc
CO
A
PESTICIDES MEPlACHLOk
           ALPHA-UHC
           6EIA-6HC
           CAMMA-bHC

HEIALS     ANTIMONY
           ARSENIC
           CAOMIUM
           CHROHIUH
           COPPLR
           CYANIDE
           LEAU
           MtKCURY
           NICKEL
           SELENIUM
           SILVER
           /INC

N-C HEIALS ALUMINUM
           bARIUM
           CALCIUM
           1KUN
           MAGNESIUM
           MANGANESE
           SODIUM
UMIS
UC/L
OC/L
UG/L
UG/L
NG/L
NC/L
NC/L
NC/L
UG/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UG/L
UC/L
NC/L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UC/L
MG/L
UG/L
MG/L
UC/L
MG/L
H.fLUtNI
L 5
L 3
I 3
I 3
2to
10
L 400
22
I 5C
I 50
27
100
1U5
277
ai
350
34
I 50
2C
272
956
110
55
1103
9
130
53

L
L
L
L
L
L

L
L
L





L

I









SECONDARY
IffLbtlH
5
3
3
a
100
50
20
21C
50
50
4
34
35
133
11
200
22
50
2
51
116
39
50
216
*
104
54
PCNT
HEM.










65
69
61
52
66
43
35

90
dl
66
65
9
60

20

OHiER
EFFLUEN
L 5
L 3
L 3
L 3
I 200
26
12
L 120
I 50
L 50
L 2
34
12
54
I 20
L 200
44
L 50
I 2
30
76
47
52
161
«
107
54
PRIMARY
I SLUDGE
N-0
31
31
N-0
N-0
N-0
N-0
N-0
L 50
16
78
177
596
537
592
19167
104
L 100
05
1163
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT HUN
COM81NEO
SLUDGE
111
460
460
165
N-0
N-0
N-0
N-0
156
282
1362
S717
16100
67517
12300
47000
1592
166
2900
31233
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NUT RUN
NOT RUN
HOT RUN
NOT RUN
SECONDARY
SLUDGE
N-0
N-D
N-0
N-D
N-0
N-0
N-0
N-0
L 50
16
357
610
1663
960
1167
24167
284
L 100
277
3317
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NUT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
             H1ILLUIANIS NO I LISIEO  MERE  NEVE.K  OLULTIU
             L-ltSS IMANI    N-0  NOT  OtlLCHL/i
             PRLLIIIINAKY UAIA UNL Y	10  6E  VtKIMU

-------
                                                MASS BALANCE IN LBB. PER DAY

                                                          PLANT  17
        FRACTION
        CONVENTIONALS
        NON-CONVENTIONALB
        VOLATILES
CO
PARAMETER

BOD
TOTAL 6USP. SOLIDS
COD
OIL I OREASE

TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS
TOTAL DIBS. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDS
VOLATILE DISS. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOL. BUS. SOLIDS
AMMONIA NITROGEN
TOC

DENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
lrl>l-TRICHLOROETHANE
1 r 1 -DICHLpROETIIANE
CHLOROFORM
I.2-TRANS-DICHLOROETHYLENE
ETHYLBENZENE
HETHYLENE CHLORIDE
NETHYL CHLORIDE
DICHLORODIFLUOROHETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE

PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENOL

NAPHTHALENE
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL> PHTHALATE
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
ANTHRACENE
PHENANTHRENE

HEPTACHLOR
ALPHA-DHC
BETA-DHC
OAMHA-BHC

ARSENIC
CADMIUM
CHROMIUH
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
       POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED
       L-LESS THAN)  N-D  NOT DETECTEDI
       PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY	TO BE VERIFIED
        ACID EXTRACT
        BASE-NEUTRALS
        PESTICIDES
        METALS
INFLUENT
23715
15733
95224
4245
4.7
77042
36392
29021
13327
lisa*
4494
11474
.1
N-P
4. 6
,1
.3
,4
3.0
2.7
H-D
N-D
IS. 2
9.8
1.5
3,4
2.0
.4
2.9
.3
.2
.3
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
L O.I
N-D
L O.I
N-D
3.3
13.2
22.4
33.9
9.9
L O.t
4.2
TOTAL OUT
12031
12447
34248
37BI
3.1
48493
-
21121
-
10499
2338
4057
I 0.1
I 0.1
L O.I
L 0.1
.4
.3
I 0.1
1.0
L 0.1
L O.I
.3
1.4
L o.i
2.1
1.4
.1
4.7
.1
.4
N-D
.1
.1
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
N-D
L 0.1
1.2
5.9
8.8
19.6
5.3
.1
3.5
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
1392
1041
13392
2351
2.4
34001
34327
10794
9794
735
2204
3429
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
N-D
,4
N-D
N-D
,8
N-D
N-D
.5
42
N-D
2.1
L 0.1
N-D
1.1
N-D
,4
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
I 0.1
N-D
N-Ii
.3
4.2
4.3
14.2 "
1.4
N-D
2.7
PRIMARY
SLUDOE
4917
4542
IJ55I
420
.3
9501
NOT RUN
4409
NOT RUN
3391
104
1133
L 0.
L 0.
L 0.
L 0.
N-
.
L 0.
.
L 0.
L 0.
L 0.
.2
L 0.1
N-D
.8
N-D
1.9
.1
N-D
N-D
.1
.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
.3
.7
2.4
2.2
2.4
L 0.1
,4
SECONDARY
SLUDOE
3522
4844
7105
610
.2
4993
NOT RUN
3714
NOT RUN
4373
30.0
1473
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
L O.t
L 0.1
N-D
L 0.1
N-D
1.0
L 0.1
N-D
.7
.1
1.7
N-D
L O.i
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
.4
1.0
2.1
1.2
1 .3
L 0.1
.4

-------
                                                    MASS BALANCE  IN L§8, ft ft DAY
            thAt 11 OH

            MEIALS



            NUN-CONV.  METALS
PARAMETER

SILVER
ZINC

ALUMINUM
BARIUM
CALCIUM
IKON
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
SODIUM
                                                              PLANT   17
INFLUENT
            TOTAL OUT
                                                           SECONDARY
                                                           EFFLUENT
                                                                                                      PRIMARY
                                                                                                      SLUDGE
   2.4
  33.3

117
  13.4
4753
135
1102
  is.»
4310
15.0
    .2
   4.2

  14.2
   4.7
6143
  24.4
                                                                                            12.8
                                                                                          4592
    .3
   4.7

NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
SECONDARY
SLUDOE

    .3
   4.1

NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
M
A
           I (II IIIIA/IIS NOT LISTED  Ut kt  NO!  l>tltCIt[i
           L-IESS THAN*  HI)  NOT  DETECTED)
           f h'tLIMINAhV DATA ONLY	TO  &£  VERIFIED

-------
                                             PERCENT  OCCURRENCE  OF  POLLUTANT  PARAMETERS

                                                              PLANT 17
fg
  PARAMETER

 1>1i1-TRICMLOROETHANE
 CHLOROFORM
 1>2-TRANS-DICHLOROETHYLENE
 ETHYLRENZENE
 HETHYLENE CHLORIDE
 TETRACMLOROETHYLENE
 TOLUENE
 TRICHLOROETHYLENE
 PHENOL
 BIS<2-ETHYLIIEXYL) PHTHALATE
 CADMIUM
 CHROMIUM
 COPPER
 CYANIDE
 LEAD
 MERCURY
 SILVER
 ZINC
 PENTACHLOROPHENOL
 NICKEL
 BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
 DIETHYL PHTHALATE
 1i1-DICHLOROETHANE
 NAPHTHALENE
 BENZENE
 DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
 HEPTACHLOR
 ALPHA-BHC
 8AHHA-BHC
 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
 1>1r2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
 1r 2-DICHLOROPROPANE
 METHYL CHLORIDE
 DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
FLUORANTHENE
4•2-BENZANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE
ANTHRACENE
PHENANTHRENE
PYRENE
BETA-BHC
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
SELENIUM
INFL-
UENT
too
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
too
100
100
100
83
83
67
67
SO
30
33
33
17
17
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
SEC.
EFFL.
4) 33
4> 100
6> 0
6} 0
4) 100
4) 100
4) 67
( 6) 0
( 4) 47
( 41 100
4) 47
4) 63
4) 100
61 100
4) 33
4> 0
4) 33
4) 100
4) 47
4) 83
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
4) 0
4> 0
4) 83
6) 0
4) 0
6) 0
4) 0 ,
4) 0 *
4) 0
4> 0
4) 0
4) 0
6) 0
4) 0
61 0
4> 0
4) 0
61 33
4) 0
6) 0
4) 0
OTHER
EFFL
4) 100
4) B3
4) 0
At 67
4) 100
4) 100
4) SO
4> 47
4) SO
4) 100
61 0
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 83
4) 67
4) 100
4) 0
6) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 83
4) 0
4) 17
4) 0
61 0
61 0
4) 0
4) 0
61 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 17
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
PR I M .
SLtiO.
4) 17
4) 0
4) 100
4) 100
4) SO
4) 17
4) 100
4) 100
4) 33
4) 100
4) 100
61 SO
4) 100
3> 100
4) 100
4) 33
4) 83
61 100
4) 0
61 100
4) 17
4» 0
61 100
61 0
4> 33
4» 0
4) 0
4) 0
61 0
4) 17
4) 0
4) 0
61 33
4> 17
4) 0
4) 0
61 0
4) 33
4) 33
61 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 33
61 0
COMB.
SI. DO
4) 50
4) 0
4> 100
4) 100
4> 03
61 SO
4> 100
4) 17
4) SO
61 100
61 100
61 100
4) 100
4) 100
SI 100
4) 100
61 100
4) 100
4) 33
4) 100
4) 100
4) 0
4) 83
61 S3
4) SO
61 100
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 33
4> 100
4) 0
4) 33
4) 100
4> 83
4> 83
4) 83
61 83
4) 100
4) 0
S) 100
4) 100
5) 100
SEC.
51 DO
4) 0
4) 0
4> 83
4> 63
4> 17
4) 0
6) 100
4) 17
4) 47
4) 83
4> 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) SO
4) 100
4 ) 1 00
4) 0
4) 100
4) 0
6) 0
4> 0
4) 17
61 17
4) 17
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
4) 17
4) 0
4> 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
( 4) 0
( 5> 0
( 4) 17
( S) 0
TAP
WATER
4) 0 <
4> 100
4> 0
61 0
61 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
4) 0
4> 0
4) 0
4) 100
4) O
4> 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
4> 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 100
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
4) 0
4) 0
61 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
( 4) 0
( S) 0
( 4) 0
( S) 0


1 )
1)
1)
1)
1)
11
\ >
1)
1)
1)
1>
1)
1)
>
1)
1)
1)
I)
t>
1)
1>
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
t)
1)
1>
1>
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1>
1)
1)
1)
1)
( 1)
           POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED AT ANY SAMPLE  POIMT
           UNCONFIRMED PESTICIDES WERE ASSUMED NOT DETECTED
           NUMBERS  IN PARENTHESES ARE THE NUMBER OF SAMPLES TAKEN
           PRELIMINARY DATA  ONLY-TO  BE VERIFIED

-------
                                               SUHMAKY Of  ANALYTICAL DATA

                                                        PLAN1   16
CONVENT|ONALS
NUN-CUNVLNlIONALS
 VULAIILES
                   BOO
                   TOTAL  SUSP. SULIDS
                   COO
                   OIL  C  CREASE

                   TOTAL  PHENOLS
                   10IAL  SOLIDS
                   TOTAL  OISS. SOLIDS
                   SETILEABLL SULIOS
                   TOIAL  VOLAI ILL  SOLIDS
                   VOLATILE UISS.  SOLIDS
                   TOTAL  VOL. SUS.  SOLIDS
                   AHHONIA HI IROCEN
                   TOC

                   DEH2ENE
                    1 ,2-OICHLUfcUEIrUI*(:
                    1,1.1-TRlCHLONOEIHANL
                    1. I-OICHLOKOt IHAUt
                    1,1,2,2-TETKACHLGfcOElHANE
                    CHLOROFORM
                    1 ,2-TRANS-OICilLO^OLlHYLENl
                     MtltmCNt CHLOHIOL
                     TRICHLOKOFLUOKOHLlHANt
                     lEIHACllLOKOLlHYLExE
                     IQlUtt.t
                     IRICHLOKQtlMYLLNL

                     2-CHLUHOPHENOL
                     2 ,4-DICIILOkOPllLNLL
                     2,4-OlMEIIIYLPIIEIlLlL
ACID EXINACI
 BASt-NLUIKALS       NAPHIMALthL
                     B1S12-E IHYLHLXYLI  PHIIIALAIt
                     ttUlYL BENiYL  PHlMALAIt
                     01 -N-BUFYl  CM1IIAI AIL
                     111 -N-UCI n  HII MM Alt
                     UlLlllYL  flllllUAlc

HIIL I HI 41.1 1,  Nil)  lliHU titKL  NLVtK  UtllCHO
1-llbS  IIUNi     N-U  Illll bill I HIM
I Ml Inn.AKY ii4i* i./.i*	10  hL  vlklMUi
UNITS
MC/L
MC/L
HC/L
MC/L
UC/L
MC/L
MC/L
ML/L
MC/L
MC/L
MC/L
MC/L
MC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
SECONDARY PCNJ
INFLUENT EFFLUENT KEM.
20B
260
717
46
5b
47b
216
11
l«,e
102
152
10
162
9
0
63
2
L 1
2
L t
12
SO
0
9
34
23
0
2
0
1
20
2
70
4
s
3U
I J
37 82
21 92
82 89
17 63
12 79
279 42
239
t 1 91
42 79
57 44
15 90
7 30
36 78
I
L

L
L

L
L

L

L

L

tt9

86
50

100

92
3 74

56
97
a?

50
L 2
I 5
0 100
L 2
4b 31
L 2 50
2 50
2 l>5
L 3
PRIMARY
SLUOCE
25243
162900
97333
9100
624
84607
NOT fcUN
997
44464
NOT *UN
96700
67
662
44
N-0
174
15
277
19
227
832
44
44
N-0
3V 8
245
20
144
N-0
N-0
113
311
4225
1231
35 J
94
H-D
SECONDARY
SLUDGE
6554
17933
17547
653
61
11039
NOT RUN
994
7511
NOT RUN
12866
10
369
1
N-0
N-0
4
12
N-0
4
6
2
N-0
N-0
31
3
N-0
N-0
t>-0
N-D
223
N-0
HO 72
44
J7
111
131

-------
                                                    SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL DATA

                                                             PLANT  16
         BASE-NEUTRALS
      ^PESTICIDES
         METALS
r\>
        NON-CONV. METALS
PARAMETER

U2-BENZANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE
ANTHRACENE
FLUORENE
PHENANTHRtNE
PYRENE

CHLORDANE
ALPHA-BMC
GAHHA-BHC

ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
ZINC

ALUMINUM
BARIUM
CALCIUM
IRON
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
SODIUM
UNITS
UG/L L
UC/L L
UC/L I
UC/L I
UG/L L
UG/L I
NC/L I
NG/L
NG/L
UG/L L
UG/L I
UG/L
UC/L
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
NG/L
UG/L
UG/L L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
HG/L
UG/L
MG/L
UG/L
HG/L
INFLUENT
5
5
3
3
3
3
2000
25
12
SO
SO
2
51
117
169
136
517
2*
50
15
330
4910
111
16
4103
4
162
45

L
I
I
L
L
L



L
L
L






L









SECONDAKY
EFFLUENT
5
5
3
3
3
3
33
52
63
50
50
2
11
6
11J
23
200
14
50
3
75
417
17
13
366
3
93
49
PCNT
HEM.








13



78
95
33
83
61
42

80
77
92
85
19
91
25
43

PRIMARY
SLUDGE
137
137
1123
214
1123
109
N-D
N-D
N-D
223
350
347
3350
14733
25250
25500
203333
1348
123
1078
32333
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
SECONDARY
SLUDGE
N-0
N-D
N-0
N-0
K-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
50
57
143
563
3283
5233
5200
4833
352
L 100
558
13950
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
       POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED HERE NEVER DETECTED
       L-LESS THANI    N-D  NOT DETECUDI
       PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY---TO BE VERIFIED

-------
                                                     MASS  BALANCE  IN LBS. PER DAY

                                                                PLANT  18
            F Ft ACT I OH
            CONVENTIONAL8
            MON-CONVENTIONAL8
            VOLATILES
¥  K
A  <**
             ACID  EXTRACT
             BASE-NEUTRALS
             I Ifal ft ll't H
             Ml IAI S
PARAMETER

BOD
TOTAL SUSP,  SOLIDS
COD
OIL I GREASE

TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS
TOTAL DISS.  SOLIDS
TOTAL VOLATILE  SOLIDS
VOLATILE DISS.  SOLIDS
TOTAL VOL.  SUB.  SOLIDS
AMMONIA NITROGEN
TOC

BENZENE
Ir2-DICHLOROETHANE
If I>|-TRICHLOROETHANE
ItI-DICHLOROETHANE
It If2f2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
CHLOROFORM
1f2-TRANB-DICHLOROETHYLENE
EIHYLBENZENE
HETHYLENE  CHLORIDE
TRICMLOROFLUOROMETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE

2-CHLOROPHENOL
2f4-DICHLOROPHENOL
2t 4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
PEHTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENOL

NAPHTHALENE
BIS(2-ETHYLIIEXYL » PHTHALATE
BUTYL  BENZYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTVL PHTHALATE
DIETHYL  PHTHALATE
I,2-BENZANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE
ANTHRACENE
FLUORENE
PHENANHIfttNE
PYKENE

CHI OKhANE
Al CHA-6IIC
CAMHA-DHC
ANTIMONV
INFLUENT
108374
139444
373712
23813
30.3
249257
112609
103249
33189
790S3
S215
84213
4.8
I O.I
32.4
.9
N-D
.9
N-D
4.3
24.0
L 0.1
4.S
17.4
11.7
L 0.1
1.0
.2
.7
10. S
.9
34.4
1 .8
1.9
19. 8
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-0
H-0
I 0,1
L O.I
NO
TOTAL OUT
84984
300539
230814
22928
7.4
291139
-
103443
-
177384
3597
21342
L 0.1
N-0
S.I
L 0.1
.3
, i
.3
1 .0
7.0
L O.I
2.2
.4
2.0
L 0.1
.3
N-D
N-0
1 .1
.4
44.0
1 .4
1 .3
2.3
.4
.2
.2
1 .3
.2
1 .1
, 1
L O.I
L O.I
L O.I
. 5
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
19207
1IOSS
42740
8491
4.3
143374
124428
21901
29723
7822
3474
18484
N-0
N-D
4.9
N-D
N-0
L 0.1
N-0
N-0
4.9
N-D
2.2
N-D
1 .7
N-0
.3
N-0
N-D
I O.I
N-D
24.8
N-0
.8
I.I
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-U
L 0.1
I O.I
L O.I
N-D
PRIMARY
SLUDGE
29438
213298
113310
10412
1.0
98449
NOT RUN
31834
NOT RUN
115104
78.3
1003
I O.I
N-0
.2
L 0. 1
.3
L O.I
.3
1 .0
L O.I
L 0.1
N-D
.5
,3
L 0.1
.2
N-D
N-D
. 1
.4
4.9
1 .4
.4
. 1
N-D
.2
.2
1 .3
.2
1 .3
. 1
N-D
N-D
N-D
.3
SECONDARY
SLUDGE
34341
74184
74344
3423
.3
44894
NOT RUN
31910
NOT RUN
34440
43.2
1431
L 0,1
N-0
N-D
L 0.1
L 0.1
N-0
L 0. I
L O.I
L 0.1
N-D
N-0
.1
t 0.1
N-0
N-0
N-0
N-D
.9
N-0
34.3
.2
.3
1.3
.4
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
.2
            HIIIUIANTB NOT LISTED UEKE NOT DETECTED
            I  ItSS  III AH I   N-D  NOT DETECTED!
            rhll IMINAKY DATA ONLY	TO BE VEMFILi'

-------
            FRACTION
            NETALS
                                                    NABS BALANCE  IN  LDS.  PER  DAY

                                                              PLANT   IB
            NON-CONV.  METALS
                           PARAMETER

                           ARSENIC
                           CADMIUM
                           CHROMIUM
                           COPPER
                           CYANIDE
                           LEAD
                           MERCURY
                           NICKEL
                           SELENIUM
                           SILVER
                           ZINC

                           ALUMINUM
                           BARIUM
                           CALCIUM
                           IRON
                           MAGNESIUM
                           MANGANESE
                           60DIUN
INFLUENT
N-D
1.2
24.7
61. t
88.0
70,7
.3
12.4
N-D
7.6
172
2560
5B.O
8343
2140
1912
84.3
23205
TOTAL OUT
.4
1.0
12.1
34.4
110
63.9
.3
10.4
.1
S.O
13*
_
-
-
-
-
-
-
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
N-D
N-D
3.4
3.3
58.9
12.1
.1
7.3
N-D
1.3
38.8
218
8.8
4844
191
1391
48.4
25438
PRIMARY
SLUDOE
,4
.4
4.1
17.2
29.4
29.7
.2
1.4
.1
1.3
37.7
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
SECONDARY
SLUDGE
.2
.4
2.4
13.9
22.2
22.1
L 0.1
1.3
N-D
2.4
S9.3
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
8
O
CTl
           POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED MERE NOT DETECTED
           L-LEBS THANI  N-D  NOT DETECTED)
           PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY	TO BE VERIFIED

-------
                                     PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF  POLLUTANT  PARAMETERS

                                                        PLANT 18
to
to
 FARAHETER

1,1,1  TRICUIOKOETHANE
HEIHYLENE CHLORIDE
TE1RACHLOROETHYLENE
IOLUENE
IKILItl OkOEIHYLEME
CHROHIIIH
COPPER
CVANIbE
I EAb
HERCUKY
NICKEL
ZINC
BENZENE
CHLOKOFORH
ETHYLBENZENE
PHENOL
BI8(2-ETHYLHEXYL>  PIIIHALAIE
BUHL BEN2YL  PHTMALATE
SILVER
GAMMA bllC
CAbMlUH
If1-DICHLOROETHANE
NAPHIIIALENE
bl-N bUTYL  PHIHALATE
til-N OCIYL  PHIHALATE
 1 .2-blCHLOROETHANE
 IR1 CHIOROFLU080HE THANE
 2  CHI OfcOPHENOL
 2.4 -bICHLOfcOPHENOL
 2>4-bIHETHYLPH£NOL
 PtHIACIIC QHOPHEHOL
 A1PIIA bllC
 1iI.2.2  lETRACHLOROEIHAHE
 1.2-TRAN8-DICHLOROETHYLENE
 blEIHYL  PHTIIALATE
 1,2  llLH/ANIIIRACENE
 CHRY8ENE
 ANMIRACENE
 U (/UhtHE
 PHENANTHRENE
 PYRENE
 CHLOKbANE
 AN1 IHIINY
 AKSENIC
 bll ENIUH
INFL-
UENT
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
63
83
63
83
63
63
63
67
SO
33
33
33
33
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0


( 4>
( 4t
< 4>
< 4)
I 4>
( 4)
< A)
( A>
( A>
< 4>
< A)
< 4)
( 4>
( 4>
< 4)
I A>
< 4)
< 4>
( 4>
( 4>
( 4»
< 4>
< 6)
< 4>
( 6)
( 4>
< A)
( A)
( 4)
( A)
( At
< 4»
( A)
< 4)
< 4»
( 6)
( 4>
< 6)
( 4>
( A)
( 6)
( A)
( A)
( A)
( A)
SECONbAKY
EFFL.
100
63
too
0
too
too
63
100
47
S3
83
too
0
17
0
17
63
0
47
too
0
0
0
47
17
o
Q
Q
17
0
o
33
o
Q
o
o
Q
o
Q
0
o
t 7
Q
Q
Q
4)
4)
4>
4)
4>
4>
4)
4>
4>
i»
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4>
4>
4)
4)
4>
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4>
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
PRIH.
SLDO
100 < 4)
100 < 4)
0
100
too
100
100
100
too
100
100
too
100
47
63
63
100
63
too
0
too
33
100
100
17
0
100
33
100
o
o
4)
83
too
0
too
100
too
47
100
too
0
too
100
47
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
SEC.
SI DO
0 <
83 (
0 <
100 (
40 <
too <
100 <
100 (
too <
17 (
too (
too <
33 <
0 (
33 (
too <
too <
33 (
too (
0 <
too <
SO (
0 <
47 <
33 (
0 (
0 <
0 <
0 <
0 <
0 <
0 <
83 <
30 (
17 (
0 I
0 (
0 (
0 (
0 (
0 (
0 (
too <
too <
0 (


4)
4)
4)
4)
S>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4)
4)
4)
4)
4>
4>
4)
4)
TAP
UATER
0 ( 1)
100 < 1)
100
0
0
0
100
Q
Q
0
Q
100
0
too
0
0
|00
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 )
1 )
1)
1)
1)
)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1 )
1 )
t)
1 )
1)
1)
1)
1)
1 )
1)
1)
1>
1)
I)
1 )
1 )
1 )
1 >
1>
>









1
1 )
1 )
             I II! I MIAMI S Hill tltilLb UEKE HUI  1'MLCIEb  AT  ANY brtHI-l E  FOINI
             LJIVl OHI IKHLU ttbllCll/ES UEKL  AL,MII1t|j NO!  I'tltt.llu
             NlinbEMi  IN t AKLNTHEUEb AKE THE  NimbtK lit  SAIUIES  IAMN
             IKM1HINARY bATA  UNI r 10 lit  VIKIMtl'

-------
                                                       SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL DATA
                                                               PLAN!   19
       .FRACTION

        CONV.



       "NON-CONV.
           PARAMETER
0>
           BUD
           TOTAL  SUSP.  SOL I OS
           CUD
           OIL C  GREASE

           TOTAL  PHENOLS
           TOTAL  SOLIDS
           TOTAL  DISS.  SOLIDS
           SETTLEABLE SOLIDS
           TOTAL  VOLATILt SOLIDS
           VOLATILE 01SS. SOLIUS
           TOTAL  VOL. SUS. SOLIDS
           AMMONIA NITROGEN
           TOC

VOLAT1LES  BENZENE
           CHLQRCOENIENE
           1,2-DlCHLORUETHANE
           1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
           1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
           I,1,2,2-TETSACHLJRUtlHANE
           CHLOROFORM
           1,2-TRANS-DICHLORUETHYLENE
           1,2-D1CHLOROPROPANE
           ETHYLBENZENE
           HETHYLENE CHLORIDE
           METHYL CHLORIDE
           METHYL BRUHlOt
           TRICHLOKOFLUOhOMETHAWE
           OICHLURODIFLUOROMETIIANt
           TETKACHLORUETHYLENE
           TOLUENE
           TRICHLORUETHYLENE
           VINYL CHLORIDE

ACIDS.     2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
           2-CHLOROPHENOL
           2i4-DICHLOROPHENOL
           2,4-OIMETHYLPHENOL
           PENTACIILUROPHENOL
           PHENOL

POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED MERE NEVER OEUCUO
L-LESS THANI     N-D  NOT DETECTED;
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY	TO BE VEKIFIEL
UNITS INFLUENT
MG/L
HG/L
MC/L
MG/L
UG/L
HG/L
HG/L
ML/L
HG/L
HG/L
MG/L
MG/L
HG/L
UG/L
UG/l
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
379
IB7
7t 3
• 112
258
1061
745
t
3tO
9'..
134
34
211
4
3
1
49
0
L 1
It
5
2
21
93
32
I 20
0
167
15
60
32
IS
L 2
2
L 2
2
I 5
130



L





t
I



L

t





L
L



L
L
L


L

SECONDARY PCMT
EFFLUENT REH.
37
22
141
15
35
762
722
1
12B
109
13
19
17
1
I
1
30
0
1
16
I
I
4
66
340
36
1
20
18
3
18
20
2
1
1
1
5
0
90
88
DO
87
86
28
3
UB
66

90
44
68
75
6T

39


11
80
50
81
27



88

95
44


50

50

100
PRIMARY
EFFLUENT
325
132
698
37
271
1007
671
1
336
79
77
20
187
3
2
1
31
1
0
14
2
1
20
66
574
110
0
130
22
61
25
72
0
3
0
1
I 5
57



L





L
L



L

I





L
L



I
L
I


I

PRE CL PRIMARY
EFFLUENT SLUDGE
45
29
146
16
48
756
674
I
120
82
21
25
73



1


4


3
61
375
42
|
20
18
2
17
20
2
1
1
3
5
0
1-9693
79583
9-4400
7920
684
58303
NOI RUN
1000
40131
NOT RUN
47550
97
981
15
N-0
N-D
115
10
657
29
7
N-D
336
32
N-D
N-0
M-D
N-0
H-0
980
376
N-0
5
28
12
N-0
20
501
SECONDARY
SLUDGE
8989
22500
21734
512
205
18044
NOT
984
RUN

13354
NOT
RUN
13667
52
675
2
N-D
N-D
67
19
1
19
341
N-D
14
29
N-0
N-D
N-D
N-0
N-D
32
28
N^D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-0
M-0
118




























-------
                                                SUMMARY  OF  ANALYTICAL DATA
                                                          PLANT
Co   ^
 A
tkAUIUH   PARAMLIEK

bASE-NEUT.  1,2,4-rRlCMLORUbENJENE
            1,2-OICMLOROBLNZENE
            1 .3-01CHLOKOJEMENE
            I .S-OICHLOROatNZENE
            FLUURANIIIENE
            NAPHItULtNE
            B1SI2-ETHYLH£XYL) PHTHALAlf
            bUKL  BEU2YL PHTHALAIE
            UI-N-BUTYL  PillMALAIt
            DI-N-OCIYL  PHIHALATE
            DIEIIIYL PIITHALATE
            ANTHRACINt
            PHENANTHRENt
            PYHENE

PESTICIDES 4,4'-UOE
            4,'i<-L)l)0
            HEPIACHLUR
            CAHHA-bHC

MLIALS     ANIIHUNY
            AKSLNIC
            CAOHIUH
            CIIKOHIUH
            COPPER
            CYANIDE
            LEAD
            MEKCURY
            NICKEL
            SELENIUM
            SILVER
            I INC

N-C MEIALS ALUMINUM
            bARIUM
            CALCIUM
            IRON
            MAGNESIUM
            MANGANESE
            iUIIIUM
UN 11 i
UC/L
UG/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
NC/L
NG/L
NC/L
NC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
NC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
MC/L
UC/L
MC/L
UC/L
MC/L
II.HUtM
L

I

L




I

I
L
t
L



I
I







L









5
7
5
2
4
3
Jj
19
I
S
3
5
S
*
200
Ub
35
105
SO
50
9
107
9b
714
47
too
54
50
1C
224
3i54
120
2b
2035
16
10
150
L

L

L
L

L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L

L
L
L



L


L
L








SCCUN'DAhV PCNT
EFFLULIH REM.
5
5
5
2
4
3
20
3
4
5
b
S
5
4
200
300
100
57
50
50
2
2t
16
337
50
03
44
50
5
38
337
16
25
643
16
111
152

29




39
64









46


70
76
64
53

66
19

50
63
91
65
11
59

22

L

L

L



L


L
L
L
L
I
I

L
L







L









PRIMARY
tFFLUENT
5
6
5
1
4
4
36
12
4
2
3
5
5
4
200
300
100
120
50
50
6
63
64
509
10
6t»3
58
50
10
249
298tt
IOJ
27
2257
16
125
148
L

L

L
L

L
I
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L

L
L
L



I



L








PRE CL PRIMARY
EFFLUENT SLUOCL
5
3
5
1
4
3
20
3
4
5
5
5
5
4
200
300
100
26
50
50
2
23
15
247
50
100
45
25
5
43
325
18
25
656
16
109
149
479
911
300
519
114
471
5038
3428
377
19
N-U
229
229
32
H-0
N-0
N-0
N-0
150
265
917
5350
12363
166000
12363
219000
2042
147
650
26363
NOT KUN
NOT RUN
NOT KUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NO! RUN
NOT f>UN
SECONDARY
SLUDGE
64
112
41
70
32
2
1914
N-0
21
6
N-0
N-0
N-0
11
,1667
N-0
N-D
N-0
82
131
2727
1343
2917
33917
5100
79167
346
17
410
16963
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
 fllllUUNli NUI L1STLO UE.U NtVth  UClLCIU)
 I-IESS THAN!    N-D  NUI  DtTECItUi
 PKLLIMINAKY JAli UNLY	II) Ut  VEMMLL

-------
                                         MASS BALANCE IN LBB. PER PAY

                                                   PLANT  19
 FRACTION
 CONVENTIONALS
 NON-CONVENTIONALS
 VOLATILE*
PARAMETER

BOD
TOTAL SUSP. SOLIDS
COD
OIL  t GREASE

TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS
TOTAL DISS. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDS
VOLATILE DISS. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOL. BUS. SOLIDS
AMMONIA NITROGEN
TOC

BENZENE
CHLOROBENZENE
1>2-DICHLOROETHANE
1>1>1-TRICHLOROETHANE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
1.1r2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
CHLOROFORM
I>2-TRANS-DICHLOROETHVLENE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYLBENZENE
HETHYLENE CHLORIDE
METHYL CHLORIDE
HETHYL BROMIDE
TRICHLOROFLUOROHETHANE
DICHLORODIFLUOROHETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
VINYL CHLORIDE

2r4r6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2-CHLOROPHENOL
2r4-DICHLOROPH£NOL
2r4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
PEHTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENOL

lr2r4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
lr2-DICHLOROBENZENE
lr3-DICHLOROBENZENE
lr4-DICHLOROBENZENE
FLUORANTHENE
NAPHTHALENE
BIB<2-ETHYLHEXYL> PHTHALATE
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED
L-LE59 THANI  N-D  NOT DETECTEDI
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY	TO BE VERIFIED
 ACID EXTRACT
 BASE-NEUTRALS
INFLUENT
21404?
10S330
408143
43394
H4
597225
420348
214614
53842
75848
19202
I1BB83
2.1
1.7
.7
27.5
.2
H-»
10.4
2.9
.8
12.0
52. 4
is.i
N-D
.2
74.1
8.6
34.0
17.9
10.9
N-D
1.2
N-D
1.0
N-D
73,4
N-D
4.0
N-D
1.3
N-D
1.4
IB. 4
10.5
.7
N-D
1.7
TOTAL OUT
138702
383547
48228S
32374
22.8
714432
-
274824
-
230811
11273
45452
L 0.1
N-D
.8
17.8
.2
1.6
9.4
2.4
.4
3.3
38.9
192
21.4
N-D
N-D
10.4
4.1
11.2
N-D
L 0.1
L 0.1
.6
,4
L 0.1
2.3
1.7
5.7
1.0
2,6
.5
1.2
38.3
8.4
I.I
L 0.1
N-D
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
20803
12237
7V82I
8440
19,5
430452
407841
72197
61540
7248
10637
38028
N-D
N-D
.8
17.0
I 0.1
N-D
9.2
N-D
.4
2.4
38.4
192
21.4
N-D
N-D
10.4
I.S
10.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
.6
.4
N-D
L 0.1
N-D
2.5
N-D
.0
N-D
N-D
11.0
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
PRIMARY
SLUDGE
49212
198879
235904
19792
1 .7
145698
NOT RUN
100287
NOT RUN
118827
241
2451
I 0.1
N-D
N-D
.3
t 0.1
1.6
L 0.1
L 0.1
N-D
.8
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
2.4
.9
N-D
L 0.1
L 0.1
L 0.1
N-D
I 0.1
1.3
1.2
2.3
.7
1.3
.3
1.2
12.6
8.6
.9
L 0.1
N-D
SECONDARY
SLUDOE
68887
172431
144558
3924
1.6
138282
NOT RUN
102340
NOT RUN
104734
395
5173
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
.5
.1
L 0.1
.1
2.6
N-D
.1
.2
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
.2
.2
N-D
H-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
.9
.5
.9
.3
.5
.2
L 0.1
14.7
N-D
.2
L 0.1
N-D

-------
                                                   MASS BALANCE IN L6S. PER DAT

                                                             PLANT   19
          m AC u UN
          BASE-NEUTRALS
          PESTICIOEfi
          METALS
           NOM-CONU.  METALS
A  £
PARAMETER

ANTHRACENE
PHENANTHREME
PYRENE

1.4'-DDE
4.4'-DDD
HEPTACHLOR
OAMHA-BHC

ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
ZINC

ALUMINUM
BARIUM
CALCIUM
IRON
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
SODIUM
INFLUENT
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-B
L O.I
L O.|
L O.t
N-D
N-D
4.9
40.3
SS.I
403
24.5
.3
30.4
N-0
5. 6
124
200?
67.7
15429
114V
9131
80.9
84904
TOTAL OUT
.4
.4
.2
L 0.1
N-D
N-D
L O.|
1.0
1.7
23.2
38.4
42.1
920
70.0
1. 1
32.6
.3
3.2
217
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
M-D
L O.I
N-0
N-D
N-0
14.7
a. a
190
N-0
L 0.1
23.0
N-D
N-D
21.2
190
9.9
14308
474
9131
42.4
85437
PRIMARY
SLUDGE
.4
.4
I 0.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
.4
.7
2.3
13.4
30.9
470
30.9
.3
3.1
.4
2.1
43.9
NOT RUM
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
SECONDARY
SLUDOE
N-D
N-D
L 0.1
L 0.1
«-D
N-D
«-»
.4
1.0
20.9
10.3
22.4
240
39.1
.4
2.7
,1
I.I
130
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
                     NOT  LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED
          I  ILS6  MIAN*  N-0  NOT DETECTED!
          I'M! IMINAKY DATA ONLY	TO BE VERIFIED

-------
                                  PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF POLLUTANT PARAMETERS

                                                   PLANT 1?
  PARAMETER

 BENZENE
 1.1r1-TRICHLOROETHANE
 CHLOROFORM
 ETHYLBENZENE
 HETHYLENE CHLORIDE
 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
 TOLUENE
 TR1CMLOROETHYLENE
 PHENOL
 BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
 CHROMIUM
 COPPER
 CYANIDE
 MERCURY
 NICKEL
 ZINC
 CHLOROBENZENE
 1,2-TRANB-DICHLOROETHYLENE
 If 2-DICIILOROPROPANE
 B1S<2-ETHYLHEXYL> PHTHALATE
 CAOHIUH
 SILVER
 2-CHLOROPHENOL
 NAPHTHALENE
 OAMHA-BHC
 LEAD
 2.4-DIHETHYLPHEHOL
 DIETHYL PHTHALATE
 1•2-D1CHLOROETHANE
 1,1-PICHLOROETHANE
 METHYL CHLORIDE
 VINYL CHLORIDE
 1.2-DICHLOROBENZENE
 1r 4-DICHLOROBENZENE
 TRICHLOROFLUOROHETHANE
 DICHLORODIFLUOROHETHANE
 DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
 4r4'-DDD
 HEPTACHLOR
 1r1r2*2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
 METHYL BROMIDE
 2>4>6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
 2.4-DICHLOROPHENOL
 PENTACHLOROPHENOL
 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
 1>3-DICHLOROBENZENE
 FLUORANTHENE
 'DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
 ANTHRACENE
 PIIENANTHREHE
 PYRENE
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED HERE NOT DETECTED
UNCONFIRMED PESTICIDES HERE ASSUMED NOT
NUMBERS  IN PARENTHESES ARE THE NUMBER OF
PRELIMINARY  DATA  OHLY-TO  BE VERIFIED
INFL- PRIM. PRE CL. SEC. PRIM. SEC. Trtf
UENT EFFL. EFFL EFFL. SLUG SLOG WATER
100
100
too
100 '
100
100
ioo
100
100
too
100
loo
100
100
too
too
63
83
B3
B3
03
83
67
47
47
67
SO
50
33
33
33
33
33
33
17
17
17
17
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6> 100
4) 100
«) 100
6) 100
6) 100
4) 100
6) 100
6) 100
6) 100
4) S3
4) 100
4) 100
6> 100
4) 100
41 100
4) 100
6) 03
6) 03
4) SO
4> 03
4> 100
6) 100
6) 03
4) 03
At 67
4) 17
6) 50
4) 30
6) 33
4) 33
4) iOO
4) 33
6) SO
6) 17
6) 17
6) 17
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
6) 17
6> 17
6) 17
6) 17
6) 0
6) 0
6) 0
6) 0
6> 17
6) 0
4> 0
0 < 6) 0
4) 0
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
4> 100
4) 100
4) 100
6) 03
6) 17
6) 0
4) 03
6) 100
6) 100
6) 33
4> 100
6) 83
4) 0
4) 0
4) 83
4> 100
6) 0
4> 0
6) 0
6) 0
6) 33
4) 0
6> 67
6) 0
6) 33
6) 33
6> 100
4) 0
4) 33
6) 17
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
6) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 33
4) 0
4) 33
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
6) 0
6) 0
4> 100
4) 100
6) 63
4) 100
4) 100
4) 03
6) 100
4) 17
4> 0
4) IOO
6) 100
6 ) IOO
6) 33
6> 100
4) 03
4) 0
4) 0
4) 67
6) 100
6) 0
6) 0
6) 0
6) 0
6) SO
6) 0
4) 17
6) 0
6) 33
6) 17
6) 03
4) 0
6) SO
6) 17
6) 0
6) 0
6) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 33
4) 0
6) 33
6) 0
6) 0
6) 0
4> 0
6) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4> 0
4) 47
6) 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
4> 0
4) 100
4) 100
6) 100
4) 100
6) IOO
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
4> 100
6) tOO
6) 0
6) 17
4) 0
6) 100
4) 100
4) 100
6) 03
6> IOO
6> 0
4) 100
6) 0
6) 0
6) 0
6) 33
6) 0
6) 0
4) 100
6) 100
4) 0
6) 0
6) 100
6) 0
4) 0
6) 100
4) 0
6) 33
4) 50
4) 33
4) IOO
4) 100
4) 100
4> 17
4) 100
4) 47
4) 100
4> 100
4) 03
4) 100
4) 0
4) 100
4) 47
4) 03
4) 0
4) 100
4) 100
6> 100
6) IOO
4) IOO
4) 100
4) 0
4) 100
4) 0
4) 100
4) 100
4) 100
4) 0
4> 17
6) 0
6) 100
6) 0
6) 0
6) 0
4) 100
4) 0
4) 0
4) 100
4) 100
4) 0
4) 0
4) 33
4) 0
4) 0
4) 33
4) 0
4) 0
6) 0
4) 0
6) 03
4) 67
6) 100
6) 17
4) 0
4) 100 < 4) 0
4) IOO ( 6) 47
4> 0 < 1)
4) 0(1)
4) 100 ( M
4) 0(1)
4) IOO ( 1)
6) 0 < l>
4) 0
4) 0
6) 0
4) 0
4) O
6> 100
4) 100
6) 0
4) 0
4) IOO
6) 0
4> 0
4) 0
6) 0
6> 0
4) 0
4) 0
6) 0
1)
1 >
1)
l>
1 >
1>
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1>
1 )
4) 0 < 1)
6) 0(1)
6) 0 < 1)
6) 0
6) 0
4) 0
6) 0
6) 0
4) 0
6) 0
6) 0
6) 0
6) 0
6) 0
6) 0
6) 0
6) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
4) 0
1)
1)
l>
1>
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1>
1)
1)
1)
1)
1>
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
1)
4) 0(1)
6> 0 ( 1)
CTED AT ANY SAMPLE POINT
NOT DETECTED
ER OF SAMPLES TAKI l|

-------
                                     PERCENT  OCCUKkENCE OF POLLUTANT PARAMETERS

                                                        PLANT  1»
 fAKAMCILK

4.<'-DDE
AHTIHONV
AHSENIC
SELENIUH
INFL-
UENT

  0
  0
  0
  0
(  4)
(  4)
(  4)
PRIH.
EFFL.

  0
  0
  0
  0
(  4)
(  4)
                                                        <  6)
PRE CL.
EFFL

  0
  0
  0
 17
              ( 4)
              < 4)
SEC.
EFFL.

  0   I
  0   I
  0
  0
                           (  6)
                           (  4)
PRIH.
SLDG

  0
100
100
 63
                                         *>
SEC.
SLI'G

 17  <
100  <
100  (
 17  <
 TAP
UATElt

  0
  0
  0
  0
                                                              ( 1)
                                                              ( 1)
MIIIIIIAHIS HOI LISItU ULKt  NUT Iitlttltd AT ANr  6AHHLE POINl
Ml/I ONI H.HLLP PISIICIOtS UtKL  ASSUMEb HU [ IiEltCltii
HllMbihS  IN PARENTHESES ARE  THE NUMbEfc OF SAMPLES
tktllHIHAKr DATA  UNIV-IO  bt  I'tKIKItti

-------
                                                            SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL DATA

                                                                     PLANT  20
           .FRACTION

            CONV.
           NON-CONV.
                      PARAMETER
           VOLATILES
    •vl
    ro
00
 A
           AC1U5.
BOD
TOTAL SUSP. SOLIDS
COO  '
OIL C CREASE

TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS
TOTAL OISS. SOLIDS
SETTLEABLE SOLIDS
TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIUS
VOLATILE OISS. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOL. SUS. SOLIDS
AMMONIA N1TROCEN
TOC

BENZENE
CARBON TtTRACHLURIDE
l.ltl-TRICHLOROETHANE
1,1-OICHLOROETHANE
CHLOROFORM
1,2-TRANS-OICHLUROETHYLENE
EIHYLBENZENE
HETHYLENE CHLORIDE
METHYL CHLORIDE
METHYL BROMIDE
BROMOFORM
DICHLOROBRUMOMETHANE
DICHLOROUIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLORODIBROMOMETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
VINYL CHLORIDE

2»4»6-TRKHLOROPHENUL
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
PHENOL
           BASE-NEUT. I,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
                      1,2-DlCHLORUBEN/ENE

           POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED HERE NEVER DETECTED
           L-LESS THAN!    N-0  NOT DETECTED!
           PRELIMINARY DATA UMLY---TO OE VERIFIED
UNITS
HG/L
HG/L
MG/L
MG/L
UG/L
HG/L
HG/L
HL/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
HC/L
MG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L I
UG/L I
UG/L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L L
INFLUENT
2*7
421
750
32
85
Ilb3
798
21
415
eo
256
Ib
90
2
1
32
3
5
2
5
51
5
37
1
1
40
0
15
23
31
13
1
0
0
9
It
5








I





I
I

L

L
I

L
L
L




L

L


L

L
L
SECONDARY
EFFLUtMT
21
13
41
12
50
757
741
1
100
92
7
13
16
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
14
25
20
1
1
19
1
1
1
0
20
1
0
1
0
5
5
PCNT
REM.
91
97
95
63
41
36
7
96
76

97
2»
84
50

97
67
60
50
80
73

46


52

93
96
100




100
6*









L





L
L
L
L

L
L

L
L




L
L
L
I
I
I
I
L
L
L
TERI1ARY
EFFLUENT'
8
5
40
e
21
612
794
1
119
101
2
1
14
1
1
1
1
24
1
1
2
25
20
2
19
17
14
1
1
1
20
1
1
1
1
5
5
PRIMARY
SLUDGE
15833
67833
41067
5337
194
58947
NOT RUN
998
35750
NUT RUN
43750
70
1304
II
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-0
507
61
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-0
N-D
N-0
197
309
N-0
N-D
N-D
N-D
53
3oa
88
SECONDARY
SLUDGE
7543
16986
9613
1623
127
B827
NUT RUN
983
(Oil
NO I RUN
10208
27
583
K-0
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-0
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-0
N-0
N-0
N-0
N-0
53
N-D
N-0
N-D
N-0
N-0
60
7
N-0
NIIRIMCA1IUM
SLUDGE
8350
25084
9960
270
118
8499
NOT RUN
870
6089
NOT RUN
16167
a
335
N-D
N-0
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
H-0
N-0
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-0
N-0
N-D
N-D
125
N-0
N-0
N-D
N-0
N-D
23
N-D
N-0

-------
                                                   SUMMARY Of ANALYTICAL OAIA

                                                            PLANI  20
 IKiCIlUN   PAKAHtlbK

 ftASE-NtUI. FLUORANIHENE
____ . _  _   ISOPIIORONE
            NAPHIHALLNE
            blSIJ-EItlYLIIEXYL )  PlIIHJLAlt
            BUHL BfN/YL  PHIMALAU
            OI-N-BUTYL PHTHALAIE
            OIETHYL PIUIIALATE
            1.2-bENlANIHRACENE
            I 1,12-bENZQFLUORANIHENt
            CHRY1.ENL
            ACENAPHTHYLENE
            ANTHRACENE
            1.12-bENiOPERYLENE
            FLUORENE
            PHENANTHRENE
            PYRENE

 PESTICIDES 4.4--UUO
            HEPTACHLUR  tPOXlOE
            ALPHA -BMC
            CAHHA-UhC

 htlM-S     ANTIHUNY
            ARSENIC
            CADMIUM
            CHRQHIUH
            CUPPER
            CYANIDE
            LtAU
            NEHCURY
            NICKEL
            SELENIUH
            SILVER
            l(Ht

 N-L HEIALS ALUMINUM
            OARIUH
            CALCIUM
             I RUN
            HACMLSIUH
UNITS
UC/L
UC/L
UG/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
NC/L
NC/L
NC/L
NC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UG/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
NC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
HC/L
UC/L
MC/L
UC/L
1M-LUCNI
I

I




I
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L


L

I

t






I








4
6
3
24
b
3
3
5
5
5
10
5
25
5
5
4
52
38
50
113
50
9
2
39
its
f,}
26
761
63
50
7
370
27*0
125
40
2925
2i>
61
L
L
L

L
L
I
L
L
L
L
I
L
I
L
L
I
1
I

I
I
I



I
L

I
I







SECONUAkY PCNT
EFFLUENT REH.
4
10
3
6
3
*
S
5
5
5
10
5
2i
15
5
4
3CO
100
50
72
50
50
2
1
9
i7
bO
200
21
50
5
36
91
44
43
96
24
60



75
63














56



97
95
64

74
67

29
90
97
65
10
97
a
26
L
L
L

L
L
I
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L


L
I
I
L


I
I

L
L







TERTIARY PRIMARY
EFFLUENT SLUOCE
4
10
3
9
3
4
5
5
5
5
10
5
25
5
5
4
600
200
22
125
50
50
2
5
10
1565
5o
200
14
50
5
3d
31
39
43
19
2*
4
10
N-0
H-0
2357
U27
200
12
N-0
N-0
N-0
N-0
37
N-0
N-0
37
10
N-0
N-0
N-0
N-0
186
258
86
3433
14433
30050
6467
127b52
3200
134 L
773
27617
NUT RUN
NOT kUN
NOT RUN
NO! RUN
NOT RUN
ttU I KUN
SECONDARY NITRIFICATION
SLUOCE SLUDCt
N-0
N-0
N-0
671
N-0
N-0
8
N-0
N-0
N-0
N-0
3
N-0
N-0
3
N-0
N-0
N-0
N-0
h-0
10
76
46
V98
3500
2917
1420
24167
632
100
247
8750
KOI RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
365
N-0
170
425
N-0
N-0
54
70
20
70
305
700
65
250
700
310
N-C
N-0
N-0
N-0
L 50
115
16
1010
2450
1650
1600



























19500
775
I 100
165
5950
NUT
NOT
NOT
NOT
NUT
NUI




RUN
RUN
RUN
RUN
RUN
RUN
  PULLUIAHIS NUI  LISILO MlKt NLVtK JtllCILU
  l-IESS IHANI     N-D  NOT OLTECTEUi
  r«lllHlNAKY (JAIA QNLY --- 10 UE VERlFILb

-------
                                                              SUMMARY OF  ANALYTICAL DATA

                                                                      PLANT  iO

                                                                           SECONDARY PCNT   TERTIARY   PRIMARY   SECONDARY   NMRIFICATIIIN
             FRACTION   PAKAMETEK                         UNITS   INFLUENT   EFFLUtM  KEM.   EFFLUENT   SLUDGE    SLUDGE      SLUDGE

             N-C  HETALS SODIUM                           HG/L     13,!        U5              139        NOT RUN   NOT RUN     NOT RUN
Co
o
            POLLUTANTS NUT LISTED HERE NEVER DETECTED
            L-LESS THAN»    N-0  NUT DETECTEDI
            PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY- — TO BE VERIFIED

-------
                                                  MASS  BALANCE IN LSS.  PER DAT
                                                             PLANT  20
       tHACTION
       CONVENTIOMAL8
        NUN-CONVENTIONAL 8
        VOLATILE8
ui
        ACID  tXIKACI
        UASE-NLUIKALB
        I Llil ICll'tS
PARAMETER

BOD
TOTAL SUSP.  SOLIDS
COD
OIL 1 GREASE

TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS
10TAL DISS.  SOLIDS
TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDS
VOLATILE  DISS. SOLIDS
TOTAL VOL.  SUS. SOLIDS
AMMONIA  NITROGEN
TOC

BENZENE
CARBON  TETKACHLORIbE
1 i 1 . 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
1.1-OICHLOROETHANE
CHLOROFORM
1. 2-TfcANS-DICHLOftOETHYLENE
ETHYLBENZENE
NETIIYLENE CHLORIDE
HEIMYL  CHLORIDE
METHYL  BROMIDE
DICHLOROBROMOMETHANE
DICHLOROblFLUOROHETHANE
CHLORODIBROMOMETHAME
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOK'OETHYLENE
VINYL  CHLORIDE

2i4»6-TftlCHLOROPHENOL
2.4-D1CHLOROPHENOL
2.4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
PHENOL

i.2.4-IKICMLUkObtNZEME
I.2-OICULOKOHEN2ENE
FLUORANIHENE
ISOPHORONE
DIS(2-EIIIYI  lltXYL > PHIHALATE
bUIH  btNZVL  PHTIIAIAIE
DI  N Kimi   tit THAI AIE
Ditrim  tiiiiKHAit
AHIIIfiACt-Ht
PHtHAHl MHEHt
PYKtNt

4.4' -Pl'b
HLPIACm lift  tt 0X1 Lit.
OAHMA-bllC
INFLUENT
245441
417680
745327
31435

84. 3
1173960
792862
411917
87286
234219
18033
96892
2.0
1.3
31.6
3.0
4.6
2.0
4.8
30.7
4.6
36.8
N-0
39.9
.2
13.2
22.9
30.3
13.3
.7
.2
,2
8.9
13.?
N-0
N-b
3.8
23.9
8. 1
2. 7
2. 7
N-0
NO
N-l)
I 0.1
I 0,1
.2
TOTAL OUT
229951
625427
402375
69218
\
52.9
1175027
-
367708
-
388033
13234
3IBB4
L 0.1
N-0
. 7
N-0
2.2
2.2
.3
13.7
N-0
N-II
1.2
19.2
.7
1.2
1.9
J.7
N-D
.3
.2
N-D
1 .3
1 .3
.4
L O.I
N-0
28.4
3.4
.9
. 3
1
. 2
L O.I
H b
N b
I O.I
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
21200
13230
40413
12091

49.7
752283
736217
9921 1
91392
6936
12422
13403
N-D
N-0
.7
N-D
2.2
N-D
N-D
13.7
N-D
N-0
1 .2
19.2
.7
1.2
N-D
.3
N-0
.3
.2
H-D
.2
N-D
N-0
N-D
N-D
3.6
N-0
N D
N-D
N-0
N-0
N-0
N-b
N-b
L O.I
PRIMARY
SLUOOE
69899
299477
181303
23561

.9
260243
NOT RUN
137833
NOT RUN
193152
309
3736
t O.I
N-0
N-D
N-D
N-D
2.2
.3
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
.9
1 .4
N-D
N-D
H-D
N-0
.2
1 .4
.4
L O.I
N-D
10.4
3.6
.9
L O.I
.2
.2
L 0.1
N-0
N-l)
N-D
SECONDARY
8LUDOE
138832
312700
180637
33566

2.3
162499
NOT RUN
110664
NOT RUN
187925
303
10723
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
1.0
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
1.1
.1
N-D
N-D
N-D
12.4
N-D
N-D
.2
L O.I
L 0.1
N-b
N-U
N-D
N-D
       MHIUIANIb NUI L IS I til UtNt  NO I  1'CUCIED
       I  I I l,b  1HANI   N D  NUI  I'lltLltlJI
       CKIIIMINAkY DATA ONI Y	10  fc£ VEKUU'D

-------
        FRACTION

        METALS
                                                MASS BALANCE IN LBB.  PER DAY

                                                          PLANT  20
        HOH-COMW. HETALS
PARAMETER

ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
ZINC

ALUMINUM
BARIUM
CALCIUN
IRON
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
SODIUM
INFLUENT
N-D
7.3
N-0
38. 4
184
241
26,2
,0
62. i
N-D
7.0
349
272J
124
47370
2707
25472
80.3
130844
TOTAL OUT
1 .0
2.5
1.2
34,9
137
308
54,4
1.0
49.9
.4
7.9
319
^
-
-
-
-
-
-
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
N-D
N-D
N-D
1.3
9.3
84.3
N-D
N-D
20.5
N-D
N-0
33. A
70.4
43.4
42235
77.2
23517
40.0
134324
PRIMARY
SLUDGE
.8
1 .1
,4
15.2
43.7
148
28.3
.4
14.1
.6
3.4
122
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
SECONDARY
SLUDGE
.2
1.4
.8
IB. 4
44.4
53.7
24.1
,4
15.3
N-D
4.5
141
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
NOT RUN
en
       POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED
       L-LESS THAN*   N-D  NOT DETECTED*
       PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY	TO BE VERIFIED

-------
                                      HASS BALANCE IN IBS. PER  OAT
                                        TERIARY TREATMENT  SYSTEM
                                               PLANT  20
FHACIION

CONVENIIONALB
NQN-CONVENT10NAL8
 VOLAIILE8
 ACID EXTRACT
 DASE-NEUIRALB
 ft til 1C I DEB
 ML IAI b
PARAMETER

BOD
TOTAL 6USP.  SOLIDS
COD
OIL | GREASE

TOTAL PHENOLS
TOTAL SOLIDS
TOTAL DISS.  SOLIDS
TOIAL VOLATILE  SOLIDS
VOLATILE DISS.  SOLIDS
TOIAL VOL.  SUS.  SOLIDS
AHHONIA NITROGEN
TOC

I • I . I-TRICHLOROETHANE
CHLOROFORM
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
BROHOFORH
DICHLOROBROHOHETHANE
DICHLORODIFLUORONE THANE
CHLORODIBROHOHETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHVLENE
TOLUENE
IRICHLOROETHYLENE

2 . 4 • 4 - TR I CHLOROPHENOL
2.4-DICHLOROPHENOL
PHENOL

FLUORANTHENE
NAPHTHALENE
BIB(2-ETHYLHEXYL> PHTHALATE
DIETHYL  PHTHALATE
I.2-0ENZANTHRACENE
1 I . I 2-BENZOFLUORANTHENE
CHRY6ENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
ANTHRACENE
I. 12-BENZOPERYLENE
FLUORENE
PHENANTHRENE
PYRENE

ALPHA -t>HC
UAHHA-BHC

AKtitNIC
I ADHIUM
                     Cm f'EK
                     CYANII'L
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
20383
12739
38855
11425
47.8
723274
707830
95384
86041
4488
11941
HBO*
.4
2.1
13.2
N-D
1.1
18.9
.4
1.1
N-D
.3
.3
.2
.2
N-D
N-D
3.4
N-0
N-D
N-0
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
H-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
L O.I
N-D
N D
1 .1
e.y
£13. 0
TOTAL OUT
2310S
50246
S4471
7820
19 .9
791242
-
12453*
-
31339
493
13513
N-P
22. B
2.2
1 .4
17. 0
14.4
13.3
N-D
.2
N-0
N-D
N-D
I O.I
.7
.3
e. »
I 0. 1
.1
L O.I
.1
.4
1.3
. 1
.3
1 .1
.4
L O.I
. 1
.2
L O.I
1 .»
11,1
MVU
TERTIARY
EFFLUENT
7803
4300
38218
7323
19.7
775447
738310
113380
94440
1911
478
12899
N-D
22.6
2.2
1.4
17. B
14.4
13.9
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-0
N-D
N-D
N-0
N-D
8.1
N-0
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
L O.I
.1
N-D
N-D
N D
9.4
1495
NITRIFICATION
SLUDOE
13302
4S94B
18253
495
.2
1SS7S
NOT RUN
11139
NOT RUN
29428
14.7
414
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-D
N-0
N-D
.2
N-D
N-D
N-D
I 0.1
.7
.3
lfl
L oil
.1
L 0. 1
.1
.4
1 .3
.1
.3
I .3
.4
N-D
N-D
.2
I 0.1
1 .9
4 .5
3.0
IIIIIUIANIb N01 IISUli  UtKE  NO I  I'tHlILD
I  llSb IHAMJ  NO   NOT DEItCUKI
IhlllMINARY DATA ONI Y	10  BE VERIFIED
    I

-------
                                     MASS BALANCE IN LBS. PER DAY
                                       TERIARY TREATMENT SYSTEM
                                              PLANT  20
 FRACTION

 METALS
 NON-CONV. METALS
PARAMETER

LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
SILVER
ZINC

ALUMINUM
BARIUM
CALCIUM
IRON
MAGNESIUM
HANOANEBE
SODIUM
SECONDARY
EFFLUENT
            TOTAL OUT
TERTIARY
EFFLUENT
NITRIFICATION
SI.UPOE
N-D
N-D
IV. 7
N-D
34,2
2.?
I 0,1
14. e
.3
47.5
N-D
N-D
13.4
N-D
34.4
2.9
L 0.1
1 .4
,3
10.9
                                                        84.9
                                                        41,7
                                                      40407
                                                        V3.3
                                                      22412
                                                        57.6
                                                      129143
                          29. 8
                          37,1
                        40925
                          18.3
                        23090
                           3.8
                        13,2808
            NOT RUN
            NOT RUN
            NOT RUN
            NOT RUN
            NOT RUN
            NOT RUN
            NOT RUN
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED MERE NOT DETECTED
L-LESS THANI  N-D  NOT DETECTEDI
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY	TO BE VERIFIED

-------
                                             PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF  POLLUTANT  PARAMETERS

                                                               PLANT 20
01
A
<£>
 PARAMETER

CHLOROFORM
MtlimENE CIILORIbE
COPPER
CYANIDE
ZINC
H I LIU OROBROMOHE THANE
TETRACHLOROETIIYLENE
NICKEL
CHLORODIHROHOHE THANE
HI6<2 ETIirLHEXYL) PIITHALATE
OAHHA-BIIC
2.4.4-TR1CHLOROPHENOL
1,1. 1-TftICHLOROETHANE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
1MCHLORGETHYLENE
2.4-DICHLOROPHENOL
PHENOL
CHROMIUM
BENZENE
CARBON  TETRACHLORIDE
ti I-DICHLOROETHAME
1 . 2-IRAM8-DICIUOROETHYLENE
EIHYLbLNZENE
METHYL  CHLORIDE
HETIIYL  bROHIbE
DROMOFORH
TOI UENE
VINYL CHLORIDE
2t V DIMLTHY! PHENOL
1 ,2.4-TRlCHLORObENZENE
1 . 2 DItHI OKOBENZENE
FLUORANTHENE
1GOFHQRONE
NAPHTHALENE
BUTYL KENZYL  PIITHALATE
01  N bUTYL PIITHALATE
UILTHYL  PIITHALATE
1.2 l L H I C
               FOIIUIANIb  NOT  LISILli  ULKt NO I I'tlLCIELi
               IIHLONI IhHLU  tESTICIUES  WERE ASSUMED  NUT
               NIIHl.tKb IN  PARENTHESES  ARC THE NUHUER  OF
               II.LLIHINARY  ('ATA ONLY-10  6E VERIFIED
INFL-
UENT
100
100
too
100
100
83
83
83
67
47
47
SO
33
33
33
17
17
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
tCTED
li NOT
UER OF


( 4)
( 4)
< 4)
( 4)
< 4>
( 4>
( 4)
( 4)
< 4)
( 4)
( 4)
( 6k
( 4)
( 4)
< 6)
< 4)
< 4k
( 4k
< 4)
( 4k
< 4k
< 4k
4 4k
4 4k
< 4k
4 4k
( 4k
( 4k
4 4k
4 4)
4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
4 4)
4 4k
4 4)
4 4)
4 4)
( 4k
4k
4>
4k
4)
4k
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
AT ANY
PRE CL.
INFL.
100 4
100 4
100 4
100 4
100 4
0 4
100 (
100 4
17 4
100 4
tOO 4
47 4
100 4
47 4
100 4
17 4
47 <
100 4
47 4
33 4
63 4
83 4
100 4
17 4
33 4
0 4
100 4
17 4
17 4
47 4
0 4
0 4
33 4
0 4
63 4
SO 4
30 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 1
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 (
17 <
1 / 4
0 I
0 <
1 > (
SAMPLE


4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4)
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
41
4k
4k
4k
4)
4k
4)
4)
POINT
TERT.
EFFL.
100
100
100
too
100
100
0
47
63
63
63
0
0
33
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
47
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
0
0



4)
4k
6)
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
1 4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
Sk
4k
4)
6k
4)
4k
4)
4k
4)
4k
4k
4k
6)
6)
4)
6)
6)

PRIM
SLDO
0
0
100
100
100
0
0
100
0
100
0
0
0
0
33
0
33
too
63
O
0
63
too
0
0
0
too
0
0
SO
33
17
0
0
100
100
17
0
0
0
0
33
0
0
33
17
0
0
0
too
100



4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
< 4)
4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
< 4k
4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
4 6k
4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
4 4k
4 4)
4 4k
4 4k
4 4)
4 4)
4 4k
4 4)
4 4k
( 4)
( 4)
( 4)
( S >
< 6)

SEC.
SLDO
0 4 4k
0 4 6k
100 4 4k
100 < 4k
100 4 4k
0 4 4k
0 < 4k
100 4 4k
0 4 4k
100 4 6k
0 1 4k
0 4 6k
0 4 4k
0 4 4k
0 4 4)
0 4 4k
33 4 4k
100 4 4k
0 4 4k
0 4 4k
0 ( 4k
0 4 4k
0 4 4k
0 4 4k
0 4 6k
0 4 4k
100 4 6k
0 4 6k
0 4 6k
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
t7
0
0
0
0
17
0
0
17
0
0
0
0
20
100
6k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4k
4)
4)
4k
5>
4k

NIT.
SLbO
0
0
100
too
100
0
0
100
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
so
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
so
0
so
0
0
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
0
0
0
0
100



4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
( 2k
4 2k
1 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2>
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2)
4 2k
4 2k
4 2k
4 2)
4 2k
4 1 )
4 21

DETECTED
SAMPLES TAKEN

-------
                                         PERCENT  OCCURRENCE OF POLLUTANT PARAMETERS

                                                          PLANT 20
              PARAMETER

             CADMIUM
             LEAD
             MERCURY
             SELENIUM
             SILVER
INFL
UENT
0
0
0
0
0
-

( 4)
< A)
( 6)
( 4)
< 6)
PRE C
INFL.
0
33
100
0
67
L.

( 61
( A)
< A)
( A)
< A)
TERT
EFFL
0
0
0
0
0
t
•
( A)
( A>
( 4)
( 41
( «)
PRIM
SLl'O
100
100
100
100
100
,

( 4)
( A)
( «>
( 3)
< 4>
SEC.
SI. PO
JOO <
100 <
100 <
0 (
100 <


A)
A)
A)
5)
A)
NIT.
SI I'D
100
100
too
0
100

•
< 2)
< 2»
< 2)
< 1)
( 2)
Co  5
en  =>
A
    i
    2
    s
POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED MERE NOT DETECTED  AT  ANY SAMPLE POINT
UNCONFIRMED PESTICIDES WERE ASSUMED  NOT  DETECTED
NUMBERS IN PARENTHESES ARE THE MUMPER  OF SAMPLES TAKEN
PRELIMINARY DATA ONLY-TO  BE VERIFItD

-------
SECTICW n

-------
                     1.0  METHOD FOR PURGEABLE ORGANICS







1.1  Scope and Application




     1.1.1  Scope




            This method is used for the determination of purgeable  (volatile)




            organics.  The complete list of compounds is provided in Table  1.1.




            The method is complementary to liquid/liquid extraction  techniques





            for extractable organics.




     1.1.2  Application




            The method is applicable to the measurement of  purgeafala orsanics




            in municipal wastewater sludges.  It can be used  for screening  sam-




            ples of sludges for purgeable priority organics in  surveys  of mu-




            nicipal wastewater treatment plants.  The method  uses GC/MS systems




            for qualitative and semi-quantitative determination of  these com-




            pounds .




1.2  Siirmary





     Sludge samples are diluted to 0.52 total solids content  with organic-free





     water.  The diluted sample is then purged at room temperature  (^ 22°C)




     with an inert gas for 12 min.  U'ater insoluble compounds boiling below




     200°C are transferred from the aqueous phase to the gaseous phase. The




     gaseous phase is passed through a sorbent trap where the organic compounds

-------
    are concentrated.   The contents  of  the trap are then injected into  the





    GC/MS by  heating  and backflushing the trap.  As variations in recover}*





    efficiencies  for  the individual  purgeable organics can be affected  by ;he





    sample matrices,  extensive quality  control is required for accurate mea-





    surements.  The total analysis time including extraction is less than 1





    hr.  This method  is recommended  for use only by analysts experienced in




    the analysis  of purgeable organics  at the trace levels or by experienced





    technicians under the close supervision of a qualified analyst.





1.3  Apparatus and Reagents





    1.3.1   For  Sample Preparation




            1.3.1.1  Purse and trap svstej:  Assemble the system as depicted





                     in Jigures 1.1 and 1.2.  A commercial version, such as





                     the Teksar Liquid Sample Concentrator Model LSC-1,  or




                     its equivalent,  may also be used.  The purging device is





                     constructed or modified as shown in Figure 1.3.   All saa-





                     ple contacting surfaces must i  either glass or Teflon.





                     Th<=". trap is packed according to Figure 1.4.  In order to





                     function properly, the trap uiust be packed in the  follow-





                     ing order:  Place the glass wool plug in  the inlet end of





                     the trap, follow with the  OV-1. Tenax, - ilica gal,. char_-





                     coal, and finally, the second  glass wool  plug.  Reversing





                     the packing order, i.e., placing the charcoal in the  trap





                     first will cause the  silica  gel and Tenax layers to  be-





                     come contaminated with -har:?al dust causing poor  cessrption

-------
         efficiencies.  Install the trap so that the effluent
         from the purging device enters the Tenax end of the trap.
1.3.1.2  Glassware
         a.  Screw-cap vials - 40 ml with Teflon-lined caps
         b.  10 al» 50 ml, and 100 nil volumetric flasks
1.3.1.3  Analytical balance
1.3.1.4  Roller aill and 1/4 in. stainless steel ball bearings
1.3.1.5  Catalytic gas purifier
1.3.1.6  Purging gas - He or N2, water compressed, high-purity
         grade
1.3.1.7  Syringes - 10 ul, 100  1, 1 ml and 5 ml gas-tight.for
         quality control spiking.  A large bore 10-ml syringe is
         used for saaple handling.  A 20-ml gas-tight syringe is
         used for preparing standards of neat gaseous compounds.
1.3.1.8  Purgeable - organics-free water.  See Section 1.5
         a.  Activated Carbon-Calgon ?iltrasorb-200 or equivalent
1.3.1.9  Trap Packing Materials
         a.  37. 07-1 on Chromosorb-W 100/110 mesh
         b.  Tenax-CC®- 60/80 mesh
         c.  Silica gel - Davison Grade 15 35/60 mesh or equivalent
         d.  Coconut charcoal - 26 mesh Barhaby Chaney No. CA-580-
             26, Lot No. M-2649 or equivalent, as used in NIOSH
             charcoal adsorption tubes, available through Supelco,
             Inc. (Cat. No. 2-0267).
                          3

-------
           1.3.1.10  Glass  wool - Cleaned by thorough rinsing with hexine,
                     dried  in a 110eC oven,  and scored in a hexane-rinsad
                     glass  jar with TIT  -lined cap.
     1.3.2  ~or  Ouantitacion and Identification
           1.3.2.1  Gas Chromatograph-mass  spectrometer dtta system.   Finrigan
                   •  4000 or equivalent - The GC/MS interface she-Id be a  glass
                     jet separator.  The computer system should allow acquisition
                     and storage of repetitive sc?r data thr ughout the GC/MS
                     runs.   Computer software should be available to allow
                     searching of GC/MS data for display of extracted icn  cur-
                     romt profiles (EIC?) and integration of the peaks.  The
                     GC/MS should be fitted with a stainless steel or glass
                     column packed with 0.2" Carbowax 1500 or Carbopack^C.
                     Typical column dimensions are 8 ft x 1/3 in.  OD stainless
                     steel or 6 ft :: 2 ma ID glass.
            1.3.2.2  Reference naterials - Assayed quantity of compounds of
                     interest, and/or diluted standard solutions of compounds
                     of interest and internal standard compounds in nethanol.
            1.3.2.3  Mass spectrometer calibration uoapouwd - p_-fluorobroao-

                     benzene.
1.4  Sampling and Tresarvation
     1'. 4.1   Sampling
            Samples must be collected in 40-al screw-cap vials with :ero head
            space and sealed with  Teflon-lined taps.  3ef:re  using, wash all
                                      4
                                    24 i<

-------
            sample bottles and TFi seals in detergent, rinse  with tap  water




            and finally with distilled water.  Allow the bottles .and seals to




            air dry at rood temperature, heat in a 105°C oven for 1 hr,  then




            allow to cool in an area known to be free of organics.  NOTZ:




            Do not heat the TFS seals for extended periods  of time  (nore than




            1 hr) because the silicone layer slowly degrades  at 105°C.




     1.4.2  Preservation




            As a general guideline, ice samples immediately after collection,




            refrigerate at 4eC> and purge within 10 days.   Desorb "the  trap




            and complete the analyses immediately after purging.




     1.4.3  Solids Determination




            The total solids content of the sample is determined  in duplicate




            by weighing two ^ 1 ml aliquots of the extractable sludge  sample




            before and after drying overnight at 110*C.  The  general procedure




            outlined in Standard Methods f.or the Examination  of Water  and Waste-




            water, 14th ed. > for the determination of Total Dried Residue  (Part




            208A) at 103 to 105°C is applicable.




1.5  Preparation of Purgeable -Organic-Pree Water




     Organic-free water is generated by passing tap water  through a carbon




     filter bed containing about 1 Ib of activated carbon  and purged with pre-




     purified N2, preferably overnight.  A Millipore Super-Q  Water  System or




     its equivalent may be used to generate organic-free deionized water.




     Organic-free water can also be prepared by boiling distilled water  for




     15 min and transferring, while still hot, to a glass-stoppered bottle.




                                      5

-------
    Cool to room  temperature.   Continuous  purging  of  che  organic-free water





    with pre-purified  ^2 =isy  be used  during  storage to  r.ini=.iie contamination





    with volatile organic  compounds.   Test organic-free water daily by analyz-





    ing according to  this  method (see Section 1.9).





1.6  Preparation  of Standards





    1.6.1   Analytical  Standards




            Although this protocol assumes the preparation of standard solu-




            tions from assayed reference materials, cocaercia.ily prepared stock





            solutions,  such as Supelco, Inc., Purgeable Seacards, nay be used





            for analytical and fortification standards with appropriate dilution.





            1.6.1.1  Preparation from neat compounds - 7rom individual assayed




                     reference materials prepare standard stock solutions (at





                     approximately 2 ug/ul) by adding, from a lOC-ul  syringe,




                     1 to 2 drops of the 99+" pure  reference  standard  tc meth-





                     anol  (9.8 ml) contained  in a  tared 10-al volumetric flask





                     (weighed to the nearest  0.1 ag).  Add the  component so





                     that the two drops fall  into  the alcohol and do  not con-




                     tact the neck of  the  flask.   (Prepare gaseous  standards,





                     i.e., vinyl chloride)  in a similar asr-er  using  a 20-al





                     syringe  (20 ml) with  the gaseous compound.   Weight  the  13-





                     ml volumetric flask containing 9.3 til  cf aethyl  alcohol  to





                     0.1 ag.  Lower the syringe needle  to aocut 5 m  aocve  t.-.e





                     aethvl alcohol meniscus  and  si owl'.- inject  tna  st^ncarc

-------
into the flask.  The gas rapidly dissolves  in  the methyl




alcohol.  Reweigh the flask, and use  the weight  gain  to




calculate the concentration of the  standard.   Dilute  to




volume, mix, and store in the sealed  flask.  Gas stock




standards are generally stable for  at  least  1  week when




maintained at less than 0"C.  With  the exception of 2-




chloroethylvinylether, stock standards of compounds that




boil above room temperature are generally stable for  at




least 4 weeks when stored at 4°C.   (Safety  Caution:   Be-




cause of the toxicity of most organohalides, dilutions




should be made in a glove box suitable for handling car-




cinogens.  It is advisable to use an  approved  respirator




when high concentrations of -such materials must  be- handled




in a fume hood).




From the primary stock solutions, prepare a  multicomponent




secondary dilution mixture in methyl  alcohol at'a concen-




tration of 1 ug/ml containing each  of  the compounds to be




determined.  Assuming storage at 4CC,  prepare  a  fresh mul-




ticomponent secondary dilution mixture on a  weekly basis.




Daily prepare 10 ml of a 50 ng/ml standard  from  the 1 yg/




ml multicomponent standard by dosing  500 yl  into -v 9  ml of




organic-free water, and adjusting the volume to  10.0  ml.




Analyze 1 ml and 5 ol aliquots of the aqueous  standard

-------
                Stock, solutions, as received are stored in a freezer vhea
                not in use.  To prepare a working standard, '25 ul of both
                Purgeable Standard A and Purgeable Standard B are added
                to •v 99 ml of organic-free water.  Subsequently, 100 ul
                of Purgeable Standard C and 50 ul of the acrolein/acrylo-
                nitrile standard are added and the final volume adjusted
                to 100 ml.  Final concentrations for Purgeable A and B
                compounds are 50 ng/ml.  Final concentrations of Purgeable
                C compounds are 200 ng/ml, and acrolein/acrylonitrila are
                present at 500 ng/nl in the standard.  Analyses of 1 r^l and
                5 ml of this mixed standard (after volume adjustments to
                10 ml with orgaaic-free water), will produce responses
                nominally corresponding to 50 ug/liter and 250 ug/liter,
                or 50 ng and 250 ng, respectively.
                Prepare a fresh aqueous working standard on a dailv basis.
1.6.2  Internal Standard Spiking Solution
       Although this protocol assumes the preparation of the standard so-
       lutions from neat authentic compounds, appropriate reliable commer-
       cial preparations may be used as suitable substitutes.
       1.6.2.1  Preparation from neat compounds - From stock standard  -
                solutions prepared as above, add a volume of standard to
                give 1,000 ug each of bromochiorccethane, 2-bromo-l-
                chloropropane, and 1,4-dichlorobutane to «; ml of organic-
                free water (blank water) contained in a 50-ml vcl-jmatric
                                 Q

-------
                     flask, mix and dilute to volume.  Dose 9.0 ul of this




                     internal standard spiking solution into every sample and




                     reference standard analyzed.  Prepare a fresh method re-




                     covery spiking solution on a weekly basis.  Prepare the




                     stock standard solutions monthly, or sooner if deteriora-




                     tion is indicated.




            1.6.2.2  Preparation from commercial mixed stock solution - As an




                     alternate to preparation of the mixed internal standard




                     solution from neat compounds, a commercially prepared




                     stock mixture may be employed.  The method outlined be-




                     low is specifically designed for use with the Supelco,




                     Inc., mixed stock internal standard solution which con-




                     tains 20 mg/nl of each compound.




1.7  Sample Preparation and Purging




     1.7.1  Sample Compositing




            VOA samples are collected at discrete time intervals by grab sam-




            pling.  When VOA results for relatively long time intervals, such




            as 24 hr, are necessary or desirable, compositing of several VOA




            grab samples must be performed.  To do this, normally six VOA grab




            samples (i.e., one 40-ml grab sample collected every 4 hr over a




            24-hr period) will be composited.  After storage, sample disrup-




            tion with a. glass stirring rod may be necessary to remove the san-




            ple from the VOA vial adequately.  Care must be taken to avoid







                                     10




                                   246^

-------
       displacement losses when the stirring roc -'s used.   The chilled

       samples are mixed with gentle swirling in 3.  250-ml  round-bet torn

       flask.   Vigorous mixing must be avoided to prevent  analyte losses.

       Analysis should be performed immediately after compositing.   In

       cases where this is impossible or when sarnie material is to  be

       retained for future reference, aliquots of the composited VOA sam-

       ples are returned to VCU vials with rero headspace  and refrigerated

       at 4"C.  Normally, only four full VOA vials  of composized material

       can be prepared from six individual grab samples.

1.7.2  Sample Preparation and Purging

       Condition the trap at 200°C with a flow of nitrogen or helium.

       Turn off gas flow to the purging device.

       Transfer that amount of sludge which contains greater than 50 ng

       dry solids  (i.e., 1 ml for a 5% sludge) to the syringe body.   As-

       semble the  syringe body and plunger.  Adjust the sludge aliquot

       to a volume containing 50 mg dry solids.  Add internal standard

       to the adjusted sample aliquot through the syringe  outlet.  Trans-

       fer the sample to the purging device.  Rinse the syringe with

       organic-free water and add to the purging device.   Bring the level

       in the purging device to the 10-ml mark with organic-free water.

       Prior to purging, place c. glass wool plug in the top of the purge

       tube to dispense excessive foam.  Seal the purging  device, and turn

       on the gas  flow to the purging device and adjust to a flow rate of

       approximately 40 ml/min.

                                11
                             247<

-------
            Purge the sample for 12 ^-fn while maintaining the sample and trap




            at room temperature.




1.8  Analysis of the Sample ?urge




     Analyze the sample purge by GC/MS using the  0.2%  Carbowax 1500 on 80/100




     mesh Carbopack C column described ia Section 1.3.2.1 operated with a He




     carrier gas flow of 30 ml/min.  Heat the trap to  ISO to 200*C.  Sackflush




     it for 3 min into the gas chromatograph with the  oven at 40°C.  Hold the




     oven temperature at 40°C for 3 min during  the desorption stage.   Immedi-




     ately after desorption initiate .temperature  programming.   For 8-ft stain-




     less steel columns a programming rate of 10°C/min to 170*C should be used.




     For 6-ft glass columns a program rate of 6°C/min  to  170°C is  effective.




     Hold at this temperature until all compounds of interest have eluted.  The




     purging device must be removed from the instrument and thoroughly rinsed




     with copious volumes of volatile organic-free water  between each sample




     (nominally three rinses of *v 30 ml volume  per rinse).   Thoroughly•clean




     the purging device according to procedures in Section 1.4.1 between par-




     ticularly dirty samples.  The trap must be conditioned at 180°C  with flow




     for 5 to 7 min between each sample.  The MS  should be repetitively scanned




     ovejt the range m/e 20 to 275 at 3 to 5 sec/scan.




1.9  Purgeable Organies Analytical Quality Assurance




     In addition to the instrumental quality assurance procedures  specified in




     Sections 1.9.1 and 1.9.2, analyses of replicate and  fortified samples  and




     blanks ara required to indicate the method precision and accuracy.  Since




     the method precision may be very dependent on the sample matrix, the



                                      12




                                      243^

-------
.9.4   Fortified and Duplicate Samples




      1-9.4.1  Sample Selection





               After the analysis of samples collected at the first sam-





               pling time, spike and analyze duplicate sample aliquots





               from the first samples.   For example,  for a survey program





               sampling a POTW plant daily for 4 to 6 days,  collect trip-





               licate samples for the first day.  After ccmplecing analyses





               of one set of the 1st day samples, spike and  analyze dupli-




               cate 1st day samples.  Spike the 1st day samples using





               procedures described in Section 1.9.4.2.  The frequency





               of selecting spiked duplicate samples for analysis for




               sampling programs longer than 6 days should be date —ir.ed





               from the detention times of the sludge types  samples so





               as to reflect possible changes in sample matrix.





      1.9.4.2  Fortification Procedures





               Add one or two stainless steel ball bearings  (1/8 in.





               diameter) to an empty vial and determine the  tare --eight.





               Fill the vi^l with sludge and reueigh; the weight differ-





               ence determines the wet contents of the vial.





               Fortify the sample with all of the compounds  noted in "-able





               1.1 to produce a final concentration two times the concen-





               tration found in the unspiked sample, or 10 time3 the lower





               limit of detection reported in Table A-l  whichever  is







                               14

-------
                     greater.  Generally,  blanket  fortifications of analytes




                     can be accomplished using  commercially available mixed




                     standards; however, for  analytes  present in unusually high




                     concentrations, supplemental  fortification with an indi-




                     vidual solution may be required.  -Seal the vial and place




                     on a roller mill in a 4°C  cold  room;  roll the sample for




                     16 hr before analysis.




                     The fortified  sample  is  handled as  a  regular sample during




                     analysis.  The quantity  of fortified  sample analyzed aust




                     be equal the quantity of original unfortified sample ana-




                     lyzed.




1.10  Cata Handling




      Using the characteristic retention times  and ions  listed in Tables 1.2




      and 1.3, obtain extracted ion current profiles (EIC?s)  of the character-




      istic ions for each compound.  Verify the presence of compounds of inter-




      est based on the coincidences of peaks  in the  characteristic EICPs at




      the appropriate retention times with intensities in  the characteristic




      ratios.




      Calculate the concentrations  of compounds identified by comparing Che




      areas of the primary (highest abundance)  ion peaks with the areas- o£ the-




      corresponding standard peaks.  If the sample matrix  produces a significant




      interference with the primary ion EIC?, a secondary  ion plot may be used




      for quantitation.  Tor some analytes, such as  toluene and ethylbenzene,







                                     15

-------
it say be necessary to use ions of substantially lower  intensity, e.g.,


n/e 93 or 107 for quantitative evaluation.   Calculate the concentration


in the sample as follows:


        \ /BIS\ /N\
      —  I 	   —  • ug/liter analyte  in wet  sludge




where:     A » area of peak  in sample


           B » area of peak  in standard


         Aj£ * area of internal  standard peak in sanple


         BTS * area of internal  standard peak in standard


           N « nanograms  in  standard


           V - volume of  wet sludge analyzed (ml)
                                16

-------
          Table 1.0.  Stock VGA Standards Available  ?rom  Suoelco
      Purgeable A
       Purgeable 3
     Purgeable C
Dichloroaethane
1,1-Dichloroethylene
1,1-Dichloroethane
Chloroform
Carbon tetrachloride
1,2-Dichloropropane
Trichloroethylene
1,1,2-Trichloroethan'e
Dibroaochloroaethane
Tetrachloroethvlene
Trifluoromethaae
tran'S-l,2-Dichloroethylene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1,1-Trichlofoethane
Broaodichlorcaiethane
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
cis-l,3-DlchloropTopene
Benzene
Bronofora
1,1,2,2-Tetracnloroethane
Toluene
Zthylbenzene
Chloromethane
Dichlorodifluoromechane
Broiaamethane
Vinyl chloride
Colcroethane
                                     17

-------
   Table 1.1.   Volatile Organics Detectable With  the  ?iiree-And-Trao  Method
          Comoound
                                                        Cotroound
   F/Cl/Br/Methanes

Methylchloride (chloromethane)
Methylene chloride (dichloromethane)
Chlorofora (trichloronethane)
Carbon tetrachloride
  (tetrachlorotnethane)
Methylbromide (bromomethane)
Bromoforra (tribromomethane)
Chlorodibromoinethane
Bronodichloromethane
Dichlorodifluoroaethane
Trichlorofluoronethane
    Cl-Ethanes
Qiloroethane
1, 1-Dichlc roe thane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1, 1-Trichloroethane
1,1, 2-Trichloroethane
1,1,2, 2-Tetrachloroe thane

    Cl-3enzenes
Benzene
Chlorobenzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
     Cl-Zth-vlenes, Frooane

Vinylchloride (chloroethylene)
1,1-Dichloroethylene
  (1,1-dichlcroethene)
Trans-1,2-dichloroethylene
(Trans--!., 2-dichloroethene)
Trichloroethylene (trichloroethene)
Tetrachloroethylene
  (tetrachloroethene)
1,2-dichloropropane
1,2-dichloropropylene
Trans-1,3-dichloropropene
Cis-1,3-dichloropene

     Alkenes

Acrolein (propenal)
Acrylonitrile (propene ^itril3)

     Ethers
Bis-chloromethylether*
  (sym. -dichlorodiaethylether)
2-Chloroethylvlnylether
  (2-chloroethyl ethenylether)
Bis-(2-chloroethyl) ether
  (3,3*-dichlorodiethylether)
Bis-(2-chloroisopropyl) ether
  (S,S'-dichlorodisopropyl ether)
   3is-Chloromethylether has a half-life of  about  10  seconds  in aqueous  mixtures,
                                      18

-------
      Table 1.2.  Elution Order of Volatile priority pollutants^'
          C oapound
     Chloroaethane                                      0.152
     Dichlorodifluoromethane                            0.172
     BromcBethane                                       0.181
     Vinyl Chloride               •                      0.186
     Chloroethane                                       6.204
     Methylene Chloride                                 0.292
     Trichlorofluoromethane                             0.372
     1,1-Dichloroethylene                               0.380
     Br omochl or otne thane (IS)                            0.457
     1,1-Dichloroethane                                 0.469
     Trans-1,2-dichldroethylene                         0.493
     Chloroform                                         0.557
     1,2-Dichloroethane                                 0.600
     1,1,1-Trichloroethane                              0.672
     Carbon Tetrachloride                               0.684
     Brosnodichloromethane                               0.750
     Bis-chloromethyl ether                             0.760
     1,2-Dichloropropane  .-                             0.818
     Trans-1,3-dichloropropene                          0.847
     Trichloroethylene                                  0.867
     Dibromochloromethane                               0.931
     Cis-l,3-dichloropropene                            0.913
     1,1,2-Trichloroethane                              0.913
     Benzene                                            0.937
     2-Chloroethylvinyl ether                           0.992
     2-Bromo-l-chloropropane (IS)                       1.000
     Bromoform                                          1.115
     1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroechene                          1.262
     1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane                          1.281
     1,4-Dichlorobutane (IS)                            1.312
     Toluene                                            1.341
     Chjorofaenzene                                      1.489
     EtHylbenzene                                       1.814
     Acrolein                                           Unknown
     Acrylonitrile                                      Unknown
£/  "These data were obtained under  the following conditions:   GC  column -
      stainless steel, 8-ft long x  0.1 in. I.D. packed with Carbopack C
      (60/80 mesh), coated with 0.27. Carbowax  1500; carrier flow  -  30 si/
      Bin; oven cesperature - initial 60°C held for 3 min, programmed
      8°C/min to 160°C and held until all conpounds eluted.
_b/  Retention times relative to 2-bromo-l-chloropropane with  an absolute
      retention tiae of 829 sec.

                                     19

-------
       CABZ1EX GAS R.OW CONTROL

     PtESSUBE ZEGUIATC*
                                      UOLBO INJECTION POUTS
  PURGi GAS
      COKT7.CL \
!3X MCUCUU8
aev? HUES
COLUMN OVEN

  CONFIRMATORY COLUMN


               COLUMN
                                                                              HEATeS CONT7CL
                                                                   NOT&  ALL UNES
                                                                         TIAf  AND  OC
                                                                         SHOULTl  !H H£ATH)
                                                      P«JIGING DEVK2     TO SO*C
                   Figure 1.1  - Schematic of  Purge  and Trap  Device  - Purge  Mode
                                             20

-------
             CARRIES CAS aow CONTROL
                                        UOUtO INJECTION POSTS
                                                                  COLUMN OVEN
   PRESSURE REGULATOR
              V
PURGE GAS     .     .
FLOW CONTROL X|
ISX MOLfCULAR
  OPTIONAL 4-?ORT COLUMN
  SELECTION VALVE

     TRAP INLET (TENAX END)
VALVE / RESISTANCE WTR£
                                                                             HEATS CS
                                                                  NOT&  ALL LINES SETWEN
                                                                        TRAP AND  GC
                                                                        SHOULD  BE HEATS
                                                                        TO 80-C
                                                     PURGING OEVJCE
       Figure 1.2 -  Schematic of Purge and Trap  Device  - Desorb  Mode
                                        21

-------
1/16" x 1/4"
Swage lock Reducing
Union, Bored  Through
     Wool
(Optional) for
Foaming Problems
                         to  Trap
            Sintered
            Glass Frit,
            4-8  Micron
                 1 .5 cm
                                    1/4" O.D. Exit
         O-Ring-
                               38 cm
                   Helium Purge Gcs
         figure 1.3 - Sludge  Purging Tube

-------
PACKING PROCEDURE
CONSIRUC1IOH
    MUUIPURPOSf HAT
. *
GlASi WOOl 5MM
ACIIVAUO CHARCOAL 7.7CM
ORAOI IS
N> SIIICA Oil 7.7CM
LJ

%
8
*
n

UMAX 7.7CM




37. OV-I KM
GlAJi WOOt
JMM















•*" ^
^r
* •'/


\
^
^
i
L':.
'•'?;•
n,'/
;-o^
%'
>..'»
'/>/
M:
n
»&


s/s


7«/fOOI RCSISIANCf
WIRI WRAPI'IO SOIIU _f=.--~-'
(DOUBli lAVtRj
ISCM
~~-K





i /inni ofdifAtjrc
A-V/IUUI nijui^nv*
WIRt WHAPPll) $Olll>
(SINGH IAYIR)
8CM— *-




L
c
-^C
^-c
c
c
r
v^
C
c
c
^•^
C
c
c
" C

c


c






—












J-*-^ 	 AND IIRRUIIS

P
?.
>
) ItlfRMOCOUPlE/CONIROUfft
__-^ — — — """" SINSOR
:' [ IUCIRONIC
" «v
)^^^ ^^_ IIMPIRAIURE
~) ^^^^^ CONIROl
J) •^'//^~ AflD
^ / PTHOMIUR
^> /

I
^ I
^ 1 IUBING JSCM O.IOS IN. ID

-* I OUS IN. O.O. SIAINIESS Slid
> /
^IS
•-
o
         IHAP imil
                Figure l.'i — Trap Packings  and  Conutrucl: ton

-------
            Table  1.3.   Characteristic Ions of Volatile Orzanics
     Compound
       El Ions
   (Relative Intensity)
:n .sea  to
 Cuantifv
 Chloromethane
 Dichlorodifluoromethane
 3rozoraethane
 Vinyl chloride
 Chloroethane
 Methylene chloride
 Trichlorof luoroniethane
 1,1-Dichloroethylene
 Brcaochloromethana  (IS)
 1,1-Dichloroethane

 Trans-1,2-dichloroethylene
 Chloroform
 1,2-Dichloroethane
 1,1,1,-Trichloroethane
 Carbon tetrachloride
 3roziodichlor one thane
 3is-chloromethyl ether
 1,2-Dichloropropane
 Trans-1,3-Dichloropropens
 Trichloroethylene
 Dibro-mochloratoethane
 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
 1,1,2-Trichloroethane

 Benzene
 2-Chloroethylvinyl ether
 2-3romo-l-chloropropane  (IS)
 Broraofona

 1,1,2,2-Tezrachloroethene
 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane

 1,4-dichlorobutane (IS)
 Toluene
 Chlorobenzene
 Ethylbenzene
Aero lain
AcTvionitrile
50(100); 52(33)
85(100); 87(33); 101(13); 103(9)
94(100); 96(94)
62(100); 64(33)
64(100); 66(33)
49(100); 51(33); 84(86); 86(55)
101(100); 103(66)
61(100); 96(80); 98(53)
49(100); 130(88); 128(70); 51(33)
63(100); 65(33); 83(13); 85(8);  98(7);
100(4)
64(100); 96(90); 98(57)
83(100); 85(66)
62(100); 64(33); 98(23); 100(15)
98(100); 99(66); 117(17); 119(16)
117(100); 119(96); 121(30)
83(100); 85(66); 127(13); 129(17)
79(100); 81(33)
63(100); 65(33); 112(4); 114(3)
75(100); 77(33)
95(100); 97(66); 130(90); 132(85)
129(100); 127(78); 208(13); 206(10)
75(100); 77(33)
83(95); 85(60); 97(100); 99(63);
132(9); 134(8)
78(100)
63(95); 65(32); 106(18)
77(100); 79(33); 156(5)
171(50); 173(100); 175(50); 250(4);
252(11); 254(11); 256(4)
129(64); 131(62); 164(78); 166(100)
83(100); 85(66); 131(7); 133(7);
166(5); 168(6)
55(100); 90(30); 92(.10)
91(100); 92(.78)
112(100); 114(33)
91(100); 106(33)
26(49); 27(100); 55(64); 56(83)
26(100); 51(32); 52(75); 53(99)
    50
   101
    94
    62
    64
    84
   101
    96
   128
    63
    98
    73
    30
    78
   106
    77
   173
   164
   168

    55
    92
   " i ?
   106

-------
Table 1.4.  a-Fluofobrcnotrszene Ions and Ion Abundance Criteria
                                  Ion Abundance Criteria
        50                        20-40% of base peak

        75                        55-757. of base peak

        95                        base peak

       174                        75-987. of base peak

       175                        5-97. of m/e 174

       176                        75-987. of base peak and
                                  93-997. of n/e 174

       177                        0-57. of m/e 176
                              25

-------
                     2.0  METHOD FOR SEMIVOLATTLZ C5.GANICS





2.1  Scope  and  Application



     2.1.1   Scope



            This  method applies to the determination of the base,  neutral,  and



            acid-extractable organic compounds as described in Table 2.1.



     2.1.2   Application



            The method  is for the measurement of these compounds in municipal



            wastevater  sludges.  It can be used as a qualitative and semiquantita-



            tive  screening procedure for the analyses of priority toxic orjanics



            in  surveys  of sludges from municipal wastevater treatment plants.



            As  a  screening tool,  the procedure requires the use of a GC/HS.



            spectrometer as the final detector.
     2.2.1  This method  (Figure 2.1)  uses wet sludge/solvent extraction aided



           by a high-speed  homogenizer.   The extract is separated by centri-



           fugation  and removed with a pipette.   Sludges are extracted at ?H



            S 11 and  again at  pH £2  to extract base/neutral and acidic com-



           pounds, respectively.   Both extracts  are cleaned by gel permeation



           chromatography (G?C)  and  semivolatile organic priority pollutants



           are determined in  the cleaned extracts by GC/HS.



           The method is recommended for use only by experienced organic



           analysts  or  by competent  personnel under the close supervision of



           an experienced organic analyst.      '>i_: 1 <-
                                                A*O _*_^

                                         26

-------
2.3  Apparatus
     2.3.1  For sampling, extraction and extract cleanup.
            2.3.1.1  Imulsifier-Tekaar Tissuenizer, or equivalent, high capacity,
            2.3.1.2  Centrifuge.
            2.3.1.3  Centrifuge tubes with in-lined screw caps, 250 ml or
                    .larger capacity.
            2.3.1.4  Kuderaa-Danish (K-D)  Glassware -
                     a..  Snyder Columns -  3 bulb, macro and micro
                     b.  Evaporating flasks - 500 ml
                     c.  Receiver Ampuls - 10 ml, graduated,  with spring
                         attachment.
            2.3.1.5  Water or steam bath for Kuderaa-Danish concentrations.
            2.3.1.6  Chromatographic (.Drying) Co limn - Pyrex (400-mm by 20-ca
                     ID)  without  a fritted plate.
            2.3.1.7  Separators funnels -  500 ml with teflon stopcock.
            2.3.1.8  Syringe - 100 ml,  Pyres, with long needle.
            2.3.1.9  Graduated cylinder -  500 ml.
            2.3.1.10  Vials - 1 dram (^ 4 ml) with TFZ-lined screw caps.
         *  2.3.1.11  Sample bottles - 1,000 ml or 4,000 ml glass with in-lined
                     screw caps.
            2.3.1.12  G?C  - Analytical Biochemistry Labs,  Inc.  G?C Autoprep
                     1002 or equivalent with a 25 mm ID column containing  50 to
                     60 g of SioBeads SX-3.
            2.3.1.13   Syringe filter holder - stainless steel and TFZ,  Gelaan
                     4310,  or equivalent.
                                           27

-------
            2.3.1.14 Bottles - 500 ml, brown glass.




     2.3.2  For identification and quantitation.




            2.3.2.1  Gas chromatograph/mass spectrometer with data systam -




                     Finnigan 4000 or equivalent.  The GC/MS interface should




                     be a glass jet separator.  The computer system should ailcw




                     acquisition and storage of repetitive scan data throughout




                     the GC/MS runs.  Computer software should be available to




                     allow searching of GC/MS data for display of estracted ion




                     current profiles (EICPs) and integration of the peaks.




                     GC columns required are:




                     a.  1.8 m x 2 mm ID glass packed with 17. SP-2250 on 100/




                         120 mesh Supelcoport.




                     b.  0.9-1.8 m x 2 mm ID glass packed with 1% SP-1240-DA




                         on 100/120 mesh Supelcoport.




            2.3.2.2  Gas chromatograph/flaae ionization detection with the




                     same GC columns as for the GC/MS system.




            2.3.2.3  Syringes, 10 and 100 ul.




            2.3.2.4  Internal standard solution - D-10-anthracene, 2 yg/ul




                     in dichloromethane.




2.4  Reagents




     2.4.1  For extraction and Extract Cleanup




            2.4.1.1  Dichloromethane - Burdick and Jackson "Distill ir. Glass"




                     or equivalent,  stored in original containers and used as




                     received.




                                       28

-------
       2.4.1.2  Hydrochloric acid  (HC1) -  6 H.




       2.4.1.3  Sodium, hydroxide  (NaOH) -  6 IT.




       2.4.1.4  Sodium sulfate  (^SO^.) -  Anhydrous,  granular.   Clean by




                overnight Soxhlet  extraction with  dichloromethane,  drying




                in a 110° oven, and. then heating to  650"C for 2  hours.




                ;Store in 110°C  oven-or in  glass jar  closed with  TFI®-lined




                screw cap.




       2.4.1.5  Glass wool - Cleaned by thorough rinsing  with hexane,




                dried' in a IIO'C oven, and stored  in a hexane-rinsed glass




                jar with TF2®-lined cap.




       2.4.1.6  Boiling chips - silica or  .carborundum.




       2.4.1.7  G?C calibration solutions:




                a.  Corn oil -  200 mg/ml in dichloromethane.




                b.  .bis(2-ethylhexylphthalate) and pentachlorophenol - 4.0




                    mg/ml in dichloromethane.




2.4.2  Identification and Quantitation




       2.4.2.1  Reference Materials - Assayed quantity of compounds of




                interest (Table 2.1) and/or dilute standard solutions of




     -           compounds of interest in appropriate solvents.




       2.4.2.2  Calibration Standards - bis-(pentafluorophenyl)phenyl




                phosphine and D-10-anthracene.
                                 29

-------
2.5  Preparation of Standards





     Primary standard solutions  may be prepared from the pure compounds  by





     dissolving  10  mg quantities into 10.0 ml of dichlcroaethane.   Mixed





     analytical  standards may be prepared by diluting the primary  solutions.





     Analytical  standards for all semivolatile compounds should be prepared  in





     three solutions.  The acids standard should contain each of the  phenolic





     compounds at concentrations in the range of 50 to 200 ng/ul.   3/N/? com-





     pounds should  be split between two solutions,  both at concentrations in





     the range of 20 to 100 ng/ul.   One standard should contain the more un-




     stable 3/N  compounds listed in Table 2.2 and the second  should contain  -the





     remaining 3/N/? compounds.   Analytical standards nay also be  obtained from




     I?A Effluent Guidelines Division or be prepared' by dilution of stock stand-




     ard solutions  purchased from chromatographic materials suppliers  such as





     Supelco, Inc.   All working  standards must include D-10-anthracene at 20





     ng/ul.




2. 6  Sampling and Preservation





     2.6.1  Sampling




            Samples must be collected in glass containers (1,000-4,000 all with





          "..  a TFE-lined cap.   The container should be prewashed with  acetone





            and  dried before use.  Containers should be filled no  more than  tvo-





            thirds  full with sample to minimize breakage during freezing.
                                     30     265-

-------
     2.6.2  Preservation




            Preferably, samples should "be iced or refrigerated at ^"C for not




            more than 24 hours before extraction.  Where extraction cannot be




            performed within 24 hours, saaples should be frozen.  Samples cay




            be stored for up to 30 days at -20°C or indefinitely at -75'C.  In




            order to prevent breakage during storage, the containers should not




            be slightly warmed and then recooled.  The iced or defrosted sample




            should be homogenized by nixing for 1 minute with a tissuemizar




            before analysis.




2.7  Sample Sxtraetion




     2.7.1  Preparation of Drying Column




            Immediately prior to extracting a sample, prepare a drying tube




            for the extract.  Place a small glass wool plug in the bottom of




            the column and add anhydrous sodium sulfate to a depth of 10 to




            15 cm.




     2.7.2  pH Adjustment




            Thoroughly mix the sludge sample by homogenizing in the sample




            bottle for 1 minute, 4 samples at a time, then quickly remove an




          -  80 ml aliquot into a 100 ml graduated cylinder.  Transfer the




            aliquot into a 250 ml centrifuge tube.  Basify the 80 ml portion-




            to pH i 11 with 6 IT sodium hydroxide solution.  Mix briefly with




            the homogenizer to insure uniform sample pH.




            (Mote:   If copious precipitation of carbonates is observed when




            sodium  hydroxide is added,  make the sample slightly acidic with





                                      31

-------
       6 !T hydrochloric acid and allow the  carbon dioxide  evolution  to




       caa.se before basifying the sample.)




2.7.3  Extraction




       Add 80 ml of dichloromethane to  the sample and homogenize




       for 45 to 60 sec.  Do not homogenize more than  60 sec  to  avoid




       heating the sample.  Centrifuge the  samples and extracts  at 3,000




       rpm for 30 minutes.  Repeat centrifugation if satisfactory phase




       separation is not achieved.  The mixture will separate into an




       aqueous layer over the dichloromethane extract with a  solids  cake




       at the water-dichloromethane interface.  Withdraw the  extract from




       each centrifuge tube with a 100 ml pipette.  Discharge the extracts




       into a 500 ml separately funnel.  Drain the dichloromethane through




       the drying column into a Kuderna-Danish evaporator.  Retain any




       aqueous layer and return it in approximately equal  volumes to each




       of the four centrifuge tubes.




       Extract the sample two more times (to achieve three-fold  extraction)




       according to procedures described in Sections 2.7.3 and 2.7.4.  Wash




       the drying column, with an additional 100 ml of  dichloromethane and




       combine the eluent with the extracts.




2.7.4  Extract Concentration




       Add a. boiling chip to the extract in the Kuderna-Danish evaporator




       and concentrate the extract to -v  8 ml using a 85°C  water  bath or a




       steam bath.   If the extract is only  slightly colored and  not  viscous







                                  32     f~*t^'~*a-

-------
            concentrate it further to   5 ml.   If  the extract solidifies after




            cooling, dilute it to '8 ml.    Transfer  the extract to a. 10 ml




            volumetric flask  (or 10 ml  graduated  tube) ,  dilute to the nark




            and store at 48C  rot GPC cleanup.




     2.7.5  Acidic Extraction




            Acidify the sludge sample portions  to pH S  2 with 6 N hydrochloric




            acid and extract the sample again by procedures  described in




            Sections 2.7.. 3 to 2.7.4.  Discard  the extracted  sludge aliquots.




2.8  Extract Cleanup




     2.8.1  G?C Setup, .and Calibration




            2.8.1.1  Packing the column - Place 50 to 60 g of Bio Beads -SX-3




                     in a 400 ml beaker.  Cover the  beads with dichloromethane




                     and allow the beads to swell overnight  (before packing the




                     columns) .  Transfer the swelled beads to the colunn and




                     start pumping solvent through the  column,  from bottom to




                     to top,  at 5.0 ml/min.  After —1 hour,  adjust the  pressure




                     on the column to 7 to 10 psi and pump an additional 4




                     hours to  remove air from the column.  Adjust the column




                     pressure  periodically as required  to maintain 7 to 10 psi.




            2.8.1.2  Calibration of the column  - Load 5  ml of the corn  oil




                     solution  into sample loop  No. 1  and 5 ml of  the phthalate-




                     phenol solution into loop  No. 2.   Inject the com  oil and




                     collect  10 ml fractions (i.e.,  change fraction at  2 ainuts
                                      33

-------
                intervals) for 36 minutes.  Inject  the  phthalate-phenol




                solution and collect 10 ml  fractions  for  60 minutes.  De-




                termine the com oil elution pattern  by evaporation of




                each fraction to dryness followed by  a  gravimetric determi-




                nation of the residue.  Analyze  the phthalate-phenol




                fractions by GC/FTD on the  SP-2250  and  SP-1240-DA coluoss.




                Plot the concentration of each component  in each fraction




                versus total eluent volume  (or time)  from the  injection




                points.  Choose a "dump time" which allows >85Z removal of




                the corn oil and ^85Z recovery of the bis (2-et'nylheryl)i-




                phthalate.  Choose the "collect  time" to  extend at -least




                10 minutes after the elution of  pentachlorophenol.  "Wash"




                the column 20 minutes^ between samples.  Typical parameters




                selected are:  dump time, 20 minutes  (100 ml) , collect




                time, 30 minutes (150 ml) ,  and wash time, 20 minutes




                (100 nl) .  The column can also be calibrated by the -use




                of a 254 nm UV detector in  place of gravimetric and GC




                analyses of fractions.  Measure  the peak  areas at various




                elution times to determine  appropriate  fractions.




2.S.2  Operation




       Prefilter or load all extracts via the filter  holder to avoid




       particulates that might cause flow stoppage.   Load one  5.0 ml




       aliquot for extracts of 10 ml volume.  Purge the sample loading
                                 34

-------
            tubing thoroughly with solvent between extracts.   After aspeciaj.lv




            dirty extracts, run a. G?C blank  .(i. e.,, dichloromethane) to check




            for carry-over.  Process the extracts  using the dump,  collect, sad




            wash parameters determined from  the  calibration and collect the




            cleaned extracts in 500 ail brown bottles.   Concentrate the cleaned




            extractsr combining collected fractions  from multiple  injections,




            to •v 10 si using Kuderna-Danish  evaporators and then to •v  3 al




            using micro Snyder columns.  Transfer  the cleaned  extracts  to 10




            ml graduated tubes and dilute to 5.0 ml with dichloromethane.




            Store at 4"C for GC/MS analysis.  Intensely colored extracts nay-




            require a second GPC cleanup. ..




2.9  Sanole Extract Analysis                                    J




     2.9.1  Acid.Extracts




                     GC/MS analysis - Analyze acid extracts by  GC/MS using




                     the SP-1240-DA column described in Section 2.3.2.1,-




                     operated under the following  conditions:




                    . Column temperature - 85*C for 4 'minutes,  85 to 200.*C




                                          at 10"C/min and 200°C until after




                                          the elation time  for  4-nitrophenol.




                     Injector temperature -  185°C




                     GC/MS interface temperature - 275°C




                     Carrier gas - Helium at 30 ml/min




                     Injection size - 2 ul










                                      35   27CK

-------
                The MS should be repetitively scanned over the range




                n/e 40 to 475 at 3 sec/scan.  Immediately prior to analysis,




                spike each extract with 50.0 ul of the internal standard




                solution of 2.0 ug/ul D-10-anthracene in cichloromethane.
2.9.2  Base/Neutral Pesticide Extracts
               'GC/MS analysis - Analyze the 3/N/? extracts by GC/MS




                using the SP-2250 column described in Section 2.3.2.1




                operated under the following conditions:




                Column temperature - 50°C for 4 minutes, 50 to 260°C




                                     at 10°C/ain, and 260"C until after




                                     the elution tiae for benz[£,h_,^]perylene.




                Injector temperature - 225*C




                GC/MS interface teaperature - 275*C




                Carrier gas - Helium at 30 ml/min




                Injection size - 2 ul




                The MS should be repetitively scanned over the range u/e





                40 to 475 at 3 sec/scan.




                Immediately prior to analysis, spike each extract with




                50.0 yl of the internal standard solution, which contains




                2.0 ug/ul D-10-anthracene in dichloronethane.
                                 36

-------
2.10  Zxtractable Orsanies Analytical Quality  Assurance





      In addition to the instrumental quality  assurance procedures  specified1 ia




      Se-ctions 2.10.1 and 2.10.2, analyses  of  replicate and fortified sacples an




      blanks are required to indicate the method precision and accuracy.  Since




      the method precision may be very 'dependent on  the sample matrix,  the fre-




      quency and selection of replicate and fortified  samples,  method  and field




      blanks,  and fortified blanks is designed to provide  soiae precision and




      accuracy data for each sample matrix encountered  and  is  consistent with




      the objectives and limitations of screening analyses.




      2.10.1  Method Blanks




              Analyze one -method blank (i.e., organic-free water) and one




              method blank spiked with each of the representative semi-




              volatile compounds at 10 times the detection  limits for




              every 15 samples analyzed or at least once each month




              that  analyses are being conducted.  Method blanks and




              spiked blanks are extracted and the extracts cleaned by




              the same procedures used for samples.   Analyze extracts




              of. spiked blanks by the GC/ilS procedures  described in




              Section 2.0.   Analyze extracts of blanks  by' GC/TTD using




              the same chromatographic columns and conditions.  Analyze




              all blank extracts by GC/MS that exhibit  peaks more




              intense than the D-10-anthracene internal standard.
                                     37

-------
.10.2   r.-alvtical Standards





       2.1C.2.1  Acidic Compounds





       2.10.2.2  Analytical Quality Assurance





                 2.lQ.2.2.a.  Analyze daily a GC/XS quality assurance solu-





                             tion containing 10 ng/vl decafluorotriphenyl-




                             phosphine (DFTPP), and 20 ng/ul of D-10-anthra-





                             cene and 50 ng/yl A-r.irrophenol.  Detection of





                             4-nitrophenol and the acceptability of the




                             DFTPP spectrum quality, based on the ion




                             abundance standards outlined in Table 2.3, are





                             necessary criteria for proceeding with sample




                             extract analyses.





                 2.10.2.2.0  Analyze daily a standard solution containing
                                      f



                             each of the acidic compounds listed in Table




                             2.1 in the concentration range of 50 to 200 ng/





                             ul plus D-10-anthracene at 20 ng/yl.  Response





                             factor data obtained from these standards are





                             used to estimate the concentrations of compounds.





                             identified in sample extracts.





       2.10.2.3  Base/Neutral and Pesticide Compounds





                 2.10.2.3.a  Analyze daily a GC/MS quality assurance





                             solution containing 10 ng/yl DrT??, 20 ng/ul





                             D-10-anthracene, and 50 ng/ul benzicene.





                             Detection of benridene and the ac-=ttabili:v



                                33

                                       21""*'}.—
                                       «^O^

-------
                              of  che  DFTP?  spectrum quality (see Table
                              2.3)  are  necessary criteria for proceeding
                              with  sample extract analyses.
                  2.10.2.3.b  Analyze daily standard solutions containing
                              the base/neutral and pesticide compounds
                              listed  in Table 2.1 in the concentration
                              range of  20 to 100 ng/yl plus D-10-anthraceene
                              at  20 ng/ul.   Response factor data obtained
                              from  these standards are used to estimate
                              the concentrations of compounds identified
                              in  sample extracts.
2.10.3  Field Blanks
        Extract an 80 ml aliquot  of each field blank by bech extraction
        with 3 100 ml portions of dichloromethane in a 1,000 ml separator?
        funnel.  Dry the extract  by passage through a short column .'of an-
        hydrous Na2SO£ and concentrate  to 1.0 ml in a Kudema-Danish
        evaporator.  Analyze field  blank extracts by CC/FID using the
        chromatographic columns and conditions described in Section. 2.0...
        Analyze all blank extracts  by GC/MS that exhibit peaks more in-
        tense than the D-10-anthracene  internal standard.
2.10.4  Fortified and Duplicate Samples
        2.10.4.1  Sample Selection  -  After  the analysis of samples collected
                  at the first sampling tiae, spike and analyze duplicate
                  sample aliquots from  the  first samples.  For example,
                                  39

-------
          for a survey program sampling s. POTW plane daily for 4





          to 6 days, collect triplicate samples for the first day.





          After completing analyses of one set of the first day





          samples, spike and analyze duplicate first cay sanples.




          Spike the first day samples using procedures described





          in Section 2.10.4.2.  The frequency of selecting spiked





          duplicate samples for analysis for sampling rrograms





          longer than 6 days should be determined from the deten-





          tion tines of the sludge types sampled so as to reflect





          possible changes in sample matrix.





2.10.4.2  Fortification Procedures - Spike an 30 ml aliquot of





          sludge vith all of the compounds identified in the sample





          and the representative semivolatile compounds listed in




          Table 3.2 to produce a final concentration that is tvo





          times the observed concentration or 10 times the .lover





          limit of detection reported in Table 2.9, whichever





          is greater.  The spike should be contained in two





          acetone solutions.  The first contains, acidic and





          neutral compounds and the second contains basic con-





          pounds.  The concentrations of the spiking solutions





          should be such that 1 to 5 ml of each solution are





          added to the sludge sample.  Homogenize the spiked





          sample for 45 to 60 sec and store at -°C overnight





          before extraction and analysis.

-------
2.11  Data Handling


      Using the characteristic retention times  and.ions  listed in Tables  2.4


      to 2.6,  obtian ZICP's of the characteristic  ions for each compound.


      Verify the presence of the compounds of interest based  on the coincidences


      of peaks in the characteristic ZICPs at the  appropriate retention tiaes


      with intensities in the characteristic ratios.  Calculate the concentra-


      tions of compounds identified by comparing the  areas of the primary


      (highest abundance) ion EICP peaks"with the  areas -of the corresponding


      standard peaks.  If the sample matrix produces  a significant interference


      with the primary ion ZIC?,  a secondary ion EIC? may  be  used for  quantisa-


      tion.  Calculate the concentration of compounds identified in the 'sample


      as follows:

                              -L,
                    _  , , _  i i -  I    ug/liter of  analyte  in  wet sludge  -•
                    y7!/ \VS/ l F

      where:


          A »  area of  peak in  sample extract


          3 =  area of  peak in  standard


          A^j  *  area of internal standard peak in sample extract


          B^j  =  area of internal standard peak in standard


          Vj_ - volume  of  extract injected (ul)


          VE = total volume of  extract (ml)


          N =  nanograms in standard


          Vg = volume  of wet sludge extracted (1)


          F =  fraction of  extract cleaned by GPC for analysis  (e.g.,


               20 ml -  .8).
               25 ml

-------
        Table 2.1.  Seiaivolatile Organic Prioritv Pollutants
                              ACIDS
i-Chioro-3-methylphen.ol
2-Chlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
4,6-Dinitro~2-methylphenol
Benzidine
                              BASES
                              NEUT5ALS
?olycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons

Acenaphthene
Acenaph cylene
Anthracene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(a)pyrene

?hthalates

3is(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Butylbenzyl phthalace
Diethyl phthalate

Chlorinated Hydrocarbons

2-Chloronaphthalene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dcihlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Eexachlorobenzene

Chloroalkvl Ethers

3is-(2-chloroethyl) ether
3is-(2-chloroechoxy)nethane
2-Nitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
Pentachlorophenol
Phenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
Chrysene
Dibenzo(a,g)anthracene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
Hexachloroethane
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
1,2,5-Trichlorobenzene
3is-(2—chloroisopropyl) ethe:
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
                                  42
                                     277<

-------
                         Table  2.1  (Concluded)
                               NEUTRALS
 Miscellaneous Neutrals

 4-3romophenyl phenyl ether
 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
 2,4-DiAitrotoluene
 N-Nitrosodiethylamine
 N-Nitrosodimethylaaine
 S-Indosulfan
 a-3HC
 T-3HC
 S-3HC
 Aldrin
 Heptachlor
 Heptachlor epoxide
 a-Endosulfan
-Dieldrin
 4,4'-DDE
                               PESTICIDES
 2,5-Dinltrotoluene
 Isophorone
 Nitrobenzene
 N-Ni tr o s o diphenylanine
 4,4'-DDD
 4,4'-DDT
 Endrin
 Endosulfan  sulfate
 6-BHC
 Chlordane
 Toxaphene
.PC3-1242
 PCB-1254
                                 43

-------
Discard
            Sludge
                           Sludge
                           (320ml.)
                       Adjust to  pH> 11
                       with 6£J NoOH
                    Extract 3X  with CH2Cl2
                    by Homogeni ration/
                    Centrifugation
                                 Sludge
                        Adjust to pH<  2
                        with  6M  HC1
Extract 3X wirh  CH2CI2
by Homogenization/
Centrifugation
                       Dry with Na2$O4
                     Clean  Up by GPC on
                     Bio Beads SX-3 Eluted
                     with CH2CI2
                       Determine Phenols
                       by GC/MS
                       on SP-1240-OA
                         txtract
                                    Dry  with
                                 Clean  Up by GPC on
                                 Bio Beads SX-3  Eluted
                                 with CH2CI2
Determine Base/Neutrcls
& Pesticides by GC/MS
on SP-2250
                Analysis  Scheme for Senivolatile  Organics

-------
           Table 2.2.  Unstable 3/N  Compounds
              bis(2-Chloroiso?ropyl) ether
              Nitrobenzene
              N-Nitroso-di-h-propvlanine
              bis(2-Chloroechoxy) methane
              Isophorone
              2,6-Dinitrotoluena
              2,4-Dinitrotoluene
              1,2-Diphenylhydrazine
              Bensidine
              3,3'-Dichlorobensidiae
              N-Ni tr o sodimethylamina
  Table, 2.3.  DrTPP Kav Ions and Ion Abundance Criteria
Mass                             Ion Abundance Criteria
  51                             30-60Z of mass 198
  68                             less than 22 of aass 69
  70                             less than 27. of mass 69
 127                             40-60% of mass 198
 197                             less than 1% of mass 198
 198                             base peak, 100% relative
                                   abundance
 199                             5-9% of mass 198
 275                             10-30% of mass 198
'365                             1% of mass 198
 441                           _  less than mass 443
 442                             greater than 40% of mass 198
 443                             17-23% of mass 442
                             45   28CK

-------
                        Table 2.4.  Acid Comoounds
      Compound Name
    RRT-/
D-10-Anthracene
   Characteristic
El Ions (Rel.  Int.)
2-Chlorophenol
2-Nitrophenol
Phenol
2,4-Dimethyl phenol
2 , 4-Dichlor opheriol
2,4, 6-Trichlorophenol
4-Chloro-m-cresol
2 , 4-Dinitrophenol
4 , 6-Dinitro-o-cresol
Pentachlorophenol
4-Nitrophenol
0.38
0.43
0.50
0.58
0.60
0.74
0.83
1.03
1.04
1.15
1.70
128(100), 64(54), 130(31)
139(100); 65(35), 109(8)
94(100), 65(17), 66(19)
122(100), 107(90), 121(55)
162(100), 164(50), 98(61)
196(100), 198(92), 200(26)
142(100), 107(80), 144(32)
184(100), 63(59), 154(53)
198(100), 182(35), 77(28)
266(100), 264(62), 268(63)
65(100), 139(45), 109(71)

a/  Column:   1.2 m x  2 mm  ID  glass; 1% SP-1240 DA on 100/120 Supelcoport;
              He at  30 ml/min.
    Program:  85°C for 4 min,  then  10°C/iain to 200°C and hold for 15 ain.
                                       46
                                           2Si<

-------
Tab1e 2.5.  Base-Neutral Compounds

Compound Nasne
1 , 3-Dichlorobenzene
1 , 4-Dichlorobenzene
Hexachloroethane
1 , 2-Dichlorobenzene
3is(2-chloroisopropyl) ether
Hexachlorobutadiene
1 , 2 , 4-Trichlorobenzene
Napthalene
3is(2-chloroethyl) ether
Hexachlo rocy clopentadiene
Nitrobenzene
3 is ( 2-chloroe thoxy) methane
2-Chloronaphthalene
Acenaphthylene
Acenaphthene
Lsophorone
Tluorene
2, 6-Dinitro toluene
1, 2-Diphenylhydra2ine^/
2, 4-Dinitro toluene
N-Nitrosodiphenylasine-^
Jexacj jprpbeazeme
4-3romophenyl phenyl ether
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Diaethyl phthalate
Diethyl phthalate
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Benzidine'
Sutylbenzyl phthalate
Chrysene
Di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
3enzo (a) anthracene
Di-n- octylphthalate
Benzo Cb) f luoranthene
3enzo (k) f luoranthene
3enzo(a)pyrene
Indeno (1,2, 3-cd) pyrene
RRT^
D-10-Anthracene
0.31
0.33
0.35
0.35
0.37
0.48
. 0.49
0.51
0.55
0.59
0.45
0.50
0.68
0.75
0.77
0.47
0.85
0.81
0.87
0.85
0.89
0.92
0.92
1.00
1.00
0.78
0.87
7.18
1.22
1.09
1.27
1.34
1.40
1.37
1.41
1.41
1.43
1.43
1.50
1.86
Characteristic
El Ions (Rel. Int.)
146(100), 148(64), 113(12)
146(100), 148(64), 113(11)
117(100), 199(61), 201(99)
146(100), 140(64), 113(11)
45(100), 77(19), 79(12)
225(100), 223(63), 227(65)
74(100), 109(80), 145(52)
128(100), 127(10), 129(11)
93(100), 63(99), 95(31)
237(100). 235(63), 272(12)
77(100). 123(50), 65(15)
93(100), 95(32), 123(21)
162(100), 164(32), 127(21)
152C100), 153(16), 151(17)
154(100), 153(95),' 152(53)
82(100), 95(14), 138(18)
166(100), 165(80), 167(14)
165(100). 63(72), 121(23)
77(100), 93(58), 10.5(28)
165<100.), 63(72), 121(23)
169(100), 168(71), 167(50)
284(100), 142(30), 249(24)
248(100), 250 (99), -141 (45)
178(100), 179(16), 176(15)
178(100), 179 (16), -176(15)
163(100), 164(10). 194(11)
149(100), 178(25), 150(10)
202(100), 101(23), 100(14)
202(100), 101(26), 100(17)
149(100), 150(27), 104(10)
184(100), 92(24), 185(13)
149(100), 91(50)
229(100), 229(19),' 226(23)
149(100), 167(31), 279(26)
228(100). 229(19), 226(19)
149(100), 167, 279
252(100), 253(23), 125(15)
252C100), 253 G3), 125(16)
252(100), 253(23), 125(21)
276C100), 138(23), 277(27)
                  47

-------
                            Table 2.5 (Concluded)
     Compound Name
     RRT
D-10-Anthracene
   Characteristic
El Ions (Rel. Int.
3eazo(g,h,i)perylene
N'-Ni tr o s o dimethy lamina
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
3,3' -Dichlorobenzidine
2,3,7, 8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
Bis (chloromethyl) ether
Deuterated anthracene (dlO)
1.98
0.15
0.42
0.85
1.45
1.33
—
1.00
276(100)
42,100),
130(22),
204(100)
252(100)
322(100)
45(100) ,
188(100)
, 138(37), 277(25)
74(88), 44(21)
42(64), 101(12)
, 206(34), 141(29)
, 254(66), 126(16)
, 320(90), 59(95)
49(14), 51(5)
, 94(19), 80(18)

a/  1" SP-2250 on 100/120 mesh Supelcoport in a  1.8 m x  2 mm  ID  glass  column;
      He at 30 ml/min.  Program:  50"C for 4 min,  then 10eC/min  to  260°C  and
      hold for 15 min.
b/  Elutes as azobenzene.
c/  Zlutas as diphenylaniine.
                                       48

-------
                           Table  2.6.  Pesticides
  ConrDound Name
D-10- Anthracene
      Characteristic
   El Ions  (Rel . Int . )
S-endosulfan
a-BHC
Y-BHC
S-BHC
Aldrin
Heptachlor
Heptachlor epoxide
c-Zndosulfan
Dieldrin
4,4' -DDE
4,4' -DDD
4,4' -DDT
Endrin
Endosulfan sulfate
0.47
0.94
1.00
1.03
1.05
1.06
1.13
1.14
1.18
1.20
1.22
1.27
1.30
1.30
201(100), 283(48), 278(30)
183(100), 109(86), 181(91)
183(100), 109(86), 181(91)
181(100), 183(93), 109(62)
66(100), 220(11), 263(73)
100(100), 272(60), 274(46)
355(100), 353(79), 351(60)
201(100), 283(48), 278(30)
79(100), 263(28), 279(22)
246(100), 248(64), 176(65)
235(100), 237(76), 165(93)
235(100), 237(72) , 165(59)
81(100), 82(61), 263(70) .
272(100), 387(75), 422(25)
o-BHC
Chlordane
Toxaphene
PC3-1242
PC3-1254
       1.04
    1.05-1.26
    1.12-1.35
    0.86-1.14
    1.09-1.30
183(100), 109(86), 181(90)
373(19), 375(17), 377(10)-'
(231, 233, 235)£/
(224, 260, 294)£7
(294, 330, 362)-£7
a/  1% SP-2250 on 100/120 mesh Supelcoport in a 1.8 ni x  2 sm  ID  glass
      colimn; He at 30 ml/min.  Program:  50° for 4 min, then 10*C/
      min to 260° and hold for 15 min.
b/  These three ions are characteristic for the a and f  forms of
      chlordane.  No stock should be set in these three  for other
      isomers.
c/  These ions are listed without relative intensities since  the
      mixtures they represent defy characterization by three  masses.
                                      49

-------
APPENDIX I

-------
  Table  A-2.   Fortification Detection Liaits for Base,  Neutral,  Pesticide,
 	and  Acid  Zxtractable Organic Priority Pollutant Compounds

    Detection  Li=it  "°	
          ng/uil                                         CociDound
< 10                                   Naphthalene
                                      Fluorene
                                      Di-n-butylphthalate
                                      Fluoranthene
                                      Pyrene
                                      Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
                                      Ac enaph thy1ene
                                      Diethylphthalate
                                      Benzo(k)fluoranthene
                                      Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
                                      1,2-diphenylhydrazine
                                      Phenanthrene/anthracene
10 -  20                                2-Chloronaphthalene
                                      Acenaphthalene
                                      2,6-Dinitrotoluene
                                      Butylbenzylphthalate
                                      Benzo[a]pyrene
                                      1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
                                      Diaiethylphthalate
                                      Di-n-octyl?hthalate
                                      4-Chlorophenylphenylether
                                      Hexachlorobenzene
                                      Benzidine
                                      3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
                                      4,4'-DDE
                                      4,4'-DDT
                                      Toxaphene
                                      Chrysene/benzo[a]anthracene
20 -  30                                m-Dichlorobenzene
                                    > o-Dichlorobenzene
-------
                           Table A-2 (Concluded)
     Detection Limit Range
            ng/ml	
                                                      Cotroound
30 - 40
40 - 50
50 - 100
230
240
        200
  630 - 600
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
a-BHC
T-3HC
Endrin
Heptachlor
2-Chlorophenol
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine
o-BHC
2,4-Dimethylphenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
Nitrobenzene
Bis (2-chloroethoxy)aethane
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
8-3HC
Heptachlor epoxide
Dieldrin
2-Nitrophenol
Trichlorophenol
p-Chloro-m-cresol

Pentachlorophenol
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
p-Nitrophenol
Isophorone
2,4-Dinitrophenol
SLJ  Detection limit based on standard responses and a mininrua count of 1,000
      for compound identification.  Detection limits are for the original
      analyte concentration in sludge and presumes use of this protocol.
                                      54

-------
SECTION III

-------
         made up to 10 ml volumes with  organic-free water.  The

         resultant analyte concentrations  are 5  ug/liter and 25

         ug/liter (or 50 ng and 250 ng  analyte weights, respec-

         tively) .

         Since reduced sensitivity is frequently observed for the

         more volatile purgeabie compounds,  including acrylonitrile,

         bromomethane, chlorraethane, coloroethane, dichlorodifiuoro-

         methane, and vinyl chloride, these  compounds should be

         present in the aulticcmponent  standard  at higher concen-
                                                      /
         trations.  A four-fold increas-e in  the  concentrations of

         bromomethane, chloromethane, chloroethane, dichlorodiflu-

         OTomethane, and vinyl chloride to produce 4 ug/nl final

         concentrations of these compounds in the nulticomponent

         secondary dilution will result in more  reliable analyta

         responses.   Similarly, a five-fold  increase in the- acryio-

         nitrile concentration to 5 ug/ml  in the multicomponent

         standard is also desirable.

1.6.1.2  Preparation from commercial mixed stock solutions - As an

         alternate to the preparation of standards from neat mate-

         rials, high concentration stock mixtures of volatile or-

         ganic priority pollutaats may  be  purchased commercially.

         The method outlined below is specifically designed for

         utilizing stock mixtures available  from Supelco, Inc.
                               290-

-------
             INTERIM REPORT
QUALITY ASSURANCE  FOR LABORATORY ANALYSIS
                   OF
         129  PRIORITY POLLUTANTS
             PREPARED FOR:
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
   PbNiTORiNG & DATA SUPPORT DIVISION
  OFFICE OF WATER PLANNING & STANDARDS
           401 M STREET, S.W.
        WASHINGTON, D,C.  20460
              PREPARED BY:
              VEESAR INC.
         5621 ELECTRONIC DRIVE
      SPRINGFIELD, VIRGINIA  22151
             (703) 750-3000
        CONTRACT No, 58-01-5908
               TASK 1,4
            FEBRUARY 4, 1980

-------
                  QUALITY ASSURANCE FOR. LABORATORY
                  ANALYSIS OF PRIORITY POLLLTCANTS
i     Preface
ii    List cf Tables
iii   List:- of Figures
      Acknowledgements
I     ESiTKJCUCTION
II    GENERAL QUALITY CONTROL CONSIDERATIONS AND ANALYTICAL
      iMETHODDLCGIES
III   PRIORITY POLLUTANT LABORATORY QUALITY CCNTJOL
IV    PERFORMANCE CONTROL LIMITS FOR PRIORITY POLLUTANTS

-------
                              TABLE OF C3N7:NT3
Chapter
           PREFACE  .
           ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
           IMPORTANCE OF QUALITY CONTROL                            I-1
           1.1   General                                                     - [
           1.2   Quality Assurance Programs                                    -1
           1.3   Analytical Methods                                            -2
           1.4   Reference                                                    —

           LABORATORY  SERVICES                                        :-[
           2.!   General  .                                                  2-!
           i:   Distilled Water                                              M
           2.3   Compressed Air                                             2-5
           2.4   Vacuum      .                                              2-5
           2.5   Hood System                                               2-5
           2.6   Electrical Services                                            2-5
           2.7   References                                                 2-5

           INSTRUMENT SELECTION                                        3-1
           3.1   Introduction                                                3-1
           3.2   Analytical Balances                                           3-1
           3.3   pH:Selective-Ion Meters                                       3-3
           3.-   Conductmry Meters                                          3-5
           3.5   Turbidimeters (Nephelometers)                                3-T
                Spectrometers                                              3-3
                Organic Carbon Analyzers                                    3-13
                Gas Chromatographs                                        3-i-
                Ri ferences                                                3 -1 -

           GLASSWARE                                                    -i
           -.!   General                                                    —!
           4.2   Types of Glassware                                           — 2
           4.3   Volumetric Analyses      .         .                          —3
           ~ -   Federal Specifications :"cr Voiumecr.c Glassware                  —4
           4.5   Cleaning of Glass and Porcelain                                ~-5
           45   Special Cleaning Requirements                                4-c
           4."   Disposable Glassware                                         —"
           4.3   Specialized Glassware                                        —"
           4.?   F-::ed Ware                                                —i
           4 10 References                                                 ~-y

           REAGENTS. SOLVENTS. AND GASES
           5 .    introduction
           5.2    Reagent Quality                                              -;

-------
        5.3   Elimination of Determinate Errors
        5.4   References      	
 6       QUALITY CONTROL FOR ANALYTICAL PERFORMANCE  . .     .   a- 1
        5.1   Introduction     .........          •  • •       •  •      .   f-i
        6.2.   The Industrial Approach co QC  ...........    6-1
        6.3   Applying Control Chans in Environmental Laboratories   ...    5-2
        6 A   Recommended Laboratory Quality Assurance  Program    . .     .   6-9
        5.5   Outline of a Comprehensive Quality Assurance Program   .   .  .   5-iO
        6.6   Related Topics      .................  6-13
        6.7   References ........................  6-! 3

 7       DATA HANDLING AND REPORTING                    .       .7-1
        ?. I   Introduction  ............    .     .....    7-i
        7.2   The . Analytical. Value    .....   •.   ........    7-1
        7.3   Glossary of Statistical Terms   ...............   7-3
        7.4   Report Forms   ....     .............     ...   .   7-5
        7.5   References ..........................  7-11

 8       SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR TRACE ORGANIC ANALYSIS  .   .   3-1
        8.1   'Introduction  .....................    8-1
        8.2   Sampling and Sample Handling  ...............   8-1
        3.3   Extract Handling         .................   3-4
        3.4   Supplies and Reagents   .   .  . •   ...     . .    . .     ....   8-5
        8.5   Quality Assurance  ..............          .  .   .8-7
        8.6   References ...............      .....   8-10

 9       SKILLS AND TRAINING" ......        .......      9-1
        9.1   General   ..................    9-1
        9.2   Skills   ...............              .    .         9-2
        9.3   Training  ...................     .     .         9-4

10     "  WATER AND WASTEWATER SAMPLING  .......            10- 1
        10.1  Introduction  .......... :  ........       ...   .  10-1
        10.2  .Areas of Sampling  ...............   10-2
        10.3  References ..................             10-6

11       RADIOCHEMISTRY   ..................   !Ul
        It. I  Introduction  ........      .       .      ...   11-1
        11.2  Sample Collection     .        ...                .11-1
        11.3  Laboratory Practices  .     .        .          .               11-2
        1 1.4  Quality Control       .  .        ...                     1 l-t
        1 1.5  References   .           .       .                        .
12      MICROBIOLOGY     ........             ...
        12.1  Background   ........      ....      .
        12-2  Specific Needs in Microbiology  .       .
        12.3  Intralaboratory Quality Control          .                     12-2
        12.4  Interiaboratory Quality Control   .           .                 12-2
        1 2.5  Development of a Formal Quality Assurance Program             1 2-3
        1 2.5  Documentation of a Quality Assurance Program                  1 2-3

-------
           12.7  Chain-of-Custody Procedures for Microbiological Samples          ---3
           12.8  References                       .                           12-10

  13        AQUATIC BIOLOGY   .   .     ..                                  :3-l
           13.1  Summary of General Guidelines                                i 3-1
           13.1  Discussion   ...                .                     13-2
           13.3  Rsferancs     ....        .                               13-4

  14       LABORATORY SAFETY    .  .                                     L-M
           14.1  Law and Authority for Safety and Health                        14-1
           14.2  EPA Policy on Laboratory Safety                               1—5
           14.3  Laboratory Safety Practices                                    14-7
           14.4  Report of Unsafe or Unhealthful Condition                     14-15
           14.5  References    .                                              14-15

Appendix A-Suggested Checklist for the Safety Evaluation of EPA Laboratory Areas    A-1
                                       v\i

-------
                              PREFACE
The following Quality Assurance Guide for laboratory Analysis of
Priority Pollutants vas produced at the request of the Monitoring
and Data Support Division of the Office of Water Planning and
Standards to support the National Urban Runoff Program surveillance
and analysis effort.  The objective of this report is to reflect
EPA's best effort and understanding of what steps and actions are
required to define the meaningfulness of laboratory analysis.

-------
                                LIST OF TAHT.K
 1.   Priority Pollutant Fractions to be Analyzed
 2.   Purgeable Organic Fraction
 3.   Base/Neutral Fraction
 4.   Acid Fraction
 5.   Pesticide Fraction
 6.   Metals Fraction
 7.   Conventional Fraction
 8.   Priority Pollutant Batch Size Effect on Relative QC Effort
 9.   Standard C.C Format (example)
10.   Surrogate Recovery Format (example)
11.   Purgeable Fraction - Matrix Effect Spike
12.   Purgeable Fraction - Surrogate Spike
13.   Acid Fraction - Matrix Effect Spike
14.   Acid and Base/Neutral Fraction - Surrogate Spike
15.   Base/Neutral Fraction - Matrix Effect Spike
16.   Pesticide Fraction - Matrix Effect Spike
17.   Metals Fraction - Matrix Effect Spike
18.   Conventional Fraction - Matrix Effect Spike
19.   Possible Sources of Standards
20.   Intra- Laboratory Comparison
21.   Purgeable Organics
22.   Acid Fraction
23.   Base/Neutral Fraction
24.   Pesticide Fraction
25.   Metals, Cyanide and Phenolics
26.   Priority Pollutant Surrogates

-------
                               LIST ..OF FIGOPES
1.  Handbook for Analytical Quality Control

2.  Surtnary of Required Samples and Audits for Priority Pollutant
    Analysis
                                     iii

-------
                          JONCWLEDGEMESTS
This document rests en the work and cones about throught the
efforts of numerous laboratories and scientists.  Stable anoung
the contributors are R.D. Kleopfer and B.J. Fair less at Region VII,
Kansas City, Kansas;  D.  Ballanger and staff at EMSL,  Cincinnati,
Ohio; and the Versar Inc. staff at Springfield, Va.

-------
     This document defines those actions that must be taken to assure than
valid priority pollutant data is produced by analytical laboratories.  The
general day-to-day procedures will be referred to as quality control  (QC)
activities.  The implementation coordination and supervision of these proce-
dures will be referred to as quality assurance (QA) activities.  In this
broader sense, the program will cover the four major aspects of a quality
assurance program.  Under the title of good laboratory practice will be
covered reference to all aspects of laboratory operation.  The main areas of
procedures and methods will also be summarized.  The major effort in this
program will be to develop a workable day-to-day QC model and, secondly, to
provide the detail control limits against which to measure a laboratory's
performance.
     The methodologies and procedures, as well as associated good laboratory
practice, required to do the analysis will be defined primarily through
references.  All references, to procedures and methods are based on EPA usual
practice.  EPA concludes that these methodolcgies are adequate for priority
pollutant analysis.  The adequacy of the data produced has been recently sum-
marized in an EPA report as follows:
          "Vfe can be. confident that false positive analysis are
          considerably less likely than false negative analysis
          so that when a priority pollutant is detected in the
          environment, we know the measured quantity is probably
          smaller than the true value."
     Two principal areas specific to priority pollutants are addressed in
this presentation.  The first spells out those actions that must be taken to
assure that data produced will be of known quality.  The second presents
criteria against which analytical data can be judged.  Taken together, this
document will assure data that is statistically valid, defensible and of
known precision and accuracy.
     For cost study work where the priority pollutants are really unknown,
where matrix effects are undefined and where sampling conditions are uncertain,
the procedures and QC practices specified here represent the most cost-effective

                                 3CCK

-------
solution to a complex problen.  As routine monitoring crograms  cevelcc,  a
relative reduction in the required quality control activities and,  her.cs,
the cost is expected.  Such considerations in cost reduction fall into a
broader management purview of quality assurance  than  this document addresses.
     A comprehensive Laboratory Quality Control  Program attempts  to answer
the following sorts of questions:
     (1)  Are the field samples contaminated?
     (2)  Is the analytical instrument working?
     (3)  Are all matrix effects under control?
     (4)  Was each sample properly handled in the laboratory?
     (5)  Is the precision of the analysis in the acceptable range?
     (£)  Is the laboratory uncontaminated?              "
Unless the answer to all of these questions  is "yes," there is  reasonable
doubt, for every sample batch, that valid data is being acquired.   These
questions are answered by analyzing, along with  the samples, solutions pre-
pared to address these concerns.  A sample is defined as that portion of wacer
chosen to characterize a specific site.  Any other solution is  to be considered
as a quality control audit.  This distinction can be  made clear by considering
a duplicate sample taken in the field.  One  of the pair is a sample scluticr.
and the other a quality control audit solution.  The  comprehensive set cf  CC
audit solutions to answer *11 of the above concerns include:
     (1)  A field blank
     (2)  A method standard
     (3)  A duplicate spiked with compounds  of interest
     (4)  A duplicate analyzed
     (5)  A laboratory blank
The rain control objectives and many minor control objectives can be accom-
plished by running five quality control checks with each batch  cf tr-venty
samples ccirrleted in one day.  This -model will be expanded in detail considering
the entire pncri-y pollutant list cf organic and inorganic parameters in
Section "~.

-------
     The 129 toxic and/or priority pollutants  are giver.'in Tables  2-7.  This
QA document addresses all of these except asbestos which is not within the
scope of this work.   The toxics  are grouped and named by their  analytical
nethcdologies.  The class names  of the  toxics  and the number of class members
are defined in Table 1.
                                  302<

-------
                 TABLE 1

       PSJDRTTY POLLDTANT FRACTIONS
              TO BE ANALYZED
General
Group
Organic
Parameters



Inorganic
Parameters





Class Name

Purgeables
Acids
Base/Neutrals
Pesticides

Metals
a. flame atonic
absorption
b. furnace atomic
absorption
c. cold vapor atomic
absorption
Ccraron
Abbreviation

VQA
A
B/N
P



AA

FAA

Mo. of Elements
or Compounds

31
11
46
25



10

2
1
Conventional, CN~ and
Phenol

Asbestos - not covered in this
document
                                     Total
129

-------
                                   TABLE 2
                                   ORffiNICS FRACTION

 (1)  Acrolein                                  (30)   Trichlorofluoromethane
 (2)  Acryionitrile                             (31)   Vinyl Chloride
 (3)  Benzene
 (4)  Brorodichloromethane
 (5)  BromofoCT
 (6)  Broncrrethane
 (7)  Carbon Tetrachloride
 (8)  Chlorcbenzene
 (9)  Chlorodibrortorethane
(10)  Chloroethane
(11)  2-Chloro(ethyl vinyl)  ether
(12)  Chloroform
(13)  Chloromethane
(14)  Dichlorcdifluoromethane
(15)  1,1-Dichloroethane
(16)  1,2-Dichloroethane
(17)  1,1-Dichloroethylene
(18)  Trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
(19)  Dichlororrethane
(20)  1,2-Oichloropropane
(21)  Cis-l,3-Dichloropropene
(22)  Trans-1,3-Diohloropropene
(23)  Ethylbsnzene
(24)  1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
(25)  Tetrachloroethylene
(26)  Toluene
(27)  1,1,1-Trichlcroethane
(23)  l,i,2-Trichlorcethane
(29)  Trichloroethylsne  '
                                      304<

-------
                                     TABLE 3

                              BASE/NEUTFAL FSACTICN
 (1)  Acenaphthene                     (26)
 (2)  Acenapthylene                    (27)
 (3)  Anthracene                       (28)
 (4)  Benzidine                        (29)
 (5)  Benzo(a)anthracene              (30)
 (6)  Benzo(b)fLuoranthene            (31)
 (7)  Benzo(k)fluoranthene            (32)
 (8)  Benzo(a) pyrene                  (33)
 (9)  Butyl Benzyl Phtha.late          (34)
(10)  Bis(2-chlorcethyl)  Ether        (35)
(11)  Bis(2-chloroethoxy)  Methane     (36)
(12)  Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)  Ether    (37)
(13)  3is(2-ethylhexyl)  Phthalate     (38)
(14)  4-Brorcphenyl  Phenyl Ether      (39)
(15)  Butyl Benzyl Phthalate          (40)
(16)  2-Chloronaphthalene             (41).
(17)  4-Chlorophenyl Phenyl Ether     (42)
(18)  Chrysene                         (43)
(19)  Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene          (44)
(20)  Di-n-butyl  Phthalate            (45)
(21)  1,2-Dichlorobenzene             (46)
(22)  1,3-Dichlorcbenzene
(23)  1,4-Dichlorcbenzene
(24)  3,3'-Dichlorcbenzidine
(25)  Diethyl Phthalate
Dimethyl Phthalata
2,4-Oinitrotoluene
2,6-Dini trotoluene
Di-n-octyl Phthalate
1,2-Oiphenylhydrazine
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiere
Hexachloroethane
Isophorone
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
N-ni trosodime thy lar^ine
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamirjs
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
                                      305

-------
           TABLE 4
       ACID FRACTION

 (1)   2-Chlorophenol
 (2)   p-dloro-ov-cresol
 (3)   2,4-Dichlorophenol
 (4)   2,4-Oimethylphenol
 (5)   4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
 (6)   2,4-Dinitrcphenol
 (7)   2-Nitrophenol
 (8)   4-Nitrophenol
 (9)   Pentachlorcphenol
(10)   Phenol
(11)   2,4,6-Trichlorophenol

-------
           TABLE  5
      PESTICIDE FRACTION

    (1)  Aldrin
    (2)  alpha-BK:
    (3)  beta-BIE
    (4)  ganma-BKC
    (5)  delta-BHZ
    (6)  Chlordane
    (7)  4,4'-ODD
    (8)  4,4'-CDE
    (9)  4,4'-DDT
   (10)  Dieldrin
   (11)  Endosulfan  I
   (12)  Endosulfan  II
   (13)  Endosulfan  Sulfate
   (14)  Endrin
   (15)  Endrin Aldehyde
   (16)  Heptachlor
   (17)  Heptachlor  Epoxide
(18-24)  PCS  (7 Aroclors)
   (25)  Toxaphene
          307<

-------
                       TABLE 6
                   METALS FRACTION
(1)  Antimony
(2)  Arsenic
(3)  Beryllium
(4)  Cadmium.
(5)  Chromium
(6)  Copper
(7)  Lead
 (8)  Mercury
 (9)  Nickel
(10)  Selenium
(11)  Silver
(12)  Thallium
(13)  Zinc
                       TABLE 7
                CONVENTIONAL FRACTION

                  (1)   Cyanides
                  (2)   Total Phenols
                      308<

-------
                                                                      13.
II   GENERAL QUALITY CONTROL CONSI-EPATIGNS AND ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGIES

     A.   laboratory Good Practice

         The Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory document (EPA-

600/4-79-019) contains all of the salient considerations which can fern the

general base for any Laboratory Quality Assurance Program.  This document is

available in Icoseleaf form and should be used by all laboratories in these

programs.  The abstract, and table of contents are included in this section

to show the scope of its concerns (Figure 1).

     B.  Priority Pollutant Methodologies

         The methods required to do the 129 priority pollutants are found in

the following:

         •   "Sampling and Analysis Procedures for Screening of
             Industrial Effluents for Priority Pollutants," U.S.
             EPA, Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory,
             Cincinnati, OH  45263, March 1977  (revised April 1977).

         •   "Handbook for Analytical Control in Water and Wastewater
             Laboratories," U.S. EPA, Environmental Monitoring and
             Support, Cincinnati, OH  45268, March 1979.

         The documents are available from the Environmental Monitoring and

Support Laboratory  (Cine.).  In addition, various other aspects of the required

methods will be found in the following two  references:

         •   "Procedure for Preliminary Evaluation of Analytical
             Methods to be Used in the Verification Phase of the
             Effluent Guidelines Division BAT Review," U.S. EPA,
             Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory,
             Cincinnati, OH  45263, March 1978
         •   "Addendum for Sampling and Analysis Procedures for
             Screening of Industrial Effluents for Priority Pollu-
             tants," U.S. EPA, Environmental Monitoring and Support
             Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH  45268, April 1979.

And, lastly, the alternative methodologies  recently proposed ara found' i-.:

         •   Federal Register, Volume 44, No. 233, December 3, 1979.
             "Guidelines Establishing Test Procedures for  the Analysis
             cf Pollutants, Proposed regulations."

                                   309<

-------
                                                     11.
                  FIGURE I

   HANDBOOK FOR ANALYTICAL QUALITY CONTROL
    IN WATER AND WASTEWATER LABORATORIES

Environmental Monitoring & Support Laboratory
                 (Cincinnati)
       *  Abstract
       •  Table of Contents
                31CK

-------
                                     ABSTRACT

One  of  the  fundamental  responsibilities  of water  and waste-water  management is the
establishment  of continuing programs  to  insure [he reliability and validity of analytical
laboratory  and  field  data  gathered  in water treatment and  wastewater pollution control
activities.

This handbook is addressed to laboratory directors,  leaders of field investigations, and other
personnel who bear responsibility for water and wastewater data. Subject matter of the
handbook is concerned primarily with quality control (QO  for chemical and biological :ests
and  measurements. Chapters are also included on  QC aspects of sampling, microbiology,
biology,  radiochemistry.  and safety as they  relate Co water  and wastswater  pollution
control.  Sufficient information  is offered  to allow the  reader  to inaugurate  or  reinforce
programs of analytical QC that  emphasize  early recognition,  prevention, and correction of
factors leading co breakdowns in  the  validity of water  and  wastewater pollution control
data.
                                          Lll

-------
Ill  PSICSTTY PCIiLTANTS - LABORATORY QUALITY CONTROL
     A.  Introduction
         This section is a summary of the efforts in  several ZPA and contract
laboratories to develop a meaningful cost effective quality control model.
A listing of required samples and controls for priority pollutant analysis
can be seen in Figure 2.  The general CC model will be  discussed in the
following sections as it is applied to each fraction  of the priority pollutant
list of 129.  Five control solutions most be evaluated  with each batch of
samples.  The impact of the number of samples in each batch is  shewn in
Table 8.  The 25 percent controls required by this  mcdel presupposes very
little or no experience- with the sample types and specific  fractions under
consideration.  As a data base develops, one can envision that  only samples
spiked with surrogates would be used in the presence  of sufficient data.  For
most developmental study work, however, the 25 percent  baseline- will have to
be maintained to assure the quality of the agency data  base.  Lastly,  this
section will specify the quality control, documentation  requirements necessary
to support this effort.

     B.  Basic Terms
         1.  Sample
             A sample is a representative portion of  an item  from which
characteristics of the whole can, be extracted.  In  this program,  a sample is
the volume of properly preserved water required to  analyze  for  a specific
pollutant(s) of a given fraction.  If duplicate field samples are taken, the
second one will be referred to as a QC control or a QC  audit  solution.

         2.  QA Audit Solution
             A QC audit solution is the volume of water used to test seme
varible that it is desired to control.  Examples of such solutions are spiked
solutions, blanks of various kinds and, generally,  any  material that is used to
ascertain the validity of the data.

-------
                                                                             •7
                    3U-MAPY CF REQUIRED SAMPLES  .--^ CCJ-.TPCLS
                                       FOR
                          PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSIS
                          Laboratory   •
                                                  Sairinles Laboratorv
                                                        Method
                                                         Blank
I • 1



Spiked -vith Surrogate Solution
 '—  Spiked with Matrix Effect Solution
If, n = 20
Then, 25 saircles -.vould have to be analyzed

-------
                                                             13.
                          TABLE 8
          PRIORITY POLLUTANT 3ATCH SIZE EFFECT ON
                    RELATIVE QC EFFORT
No. Sairoles in 1 Batch
No. QC Controls
                                                % QC
1
2
5
10
15
20
5
5.
5
5
5
5
500
250
100
50
33
25
Batch sizes much greater than 20 are probably unrealistic.

-------
                                                                      19.
             The following subsections 3-15 are taken directly frcm a
Region '711 Document "Quality Assurance - Organic Parameters."  Changes have
been made to make their suggestions relevant to this document and to r=rove
any responsibility for Region vn to provide either surrogate or matrix effect
spikes.

         3.  Volatiles
             The laboratory shall run one duplicate (same sample run twice),
one field blank, one reagent blank  (laboratory prepared "organic-free" water),
one method standard (standard addition to "organic-free" water), and one matrix
effect spike (standard addition to a sample) for each batch of samples processed.
             The Laboratory shall calculate the percent recovery of the surro-
gates and the standards using the external standard quantitiation method.  The
surrogate spikes will be added to every sample immediately before analysis
begins.  The standard additions will be added and held for one hour prior to
the beginning of the analysis.
         4.  Extract"?bles - Acids and Base/Neutrals
             The laboratory shall run one duplicate, one field blank, one
reagent blank,  one method standard, and one matrix effect spike for each batch
(a group of samples from each plant studied) of samples processed.  The pesti-
cides will be measured using the external standard method.  The base/neutral
and acid fractions will be measured using the internal standard method.
         5.  Method Blank
             The method blank is defined as an appropriate volume of "organic-
free" water which has been processed exactly as a sample  (same glassware,
reagents, solvents, etc.).  For the extractable parameters  (3/N, A, P) , this
would recuire extraction of one liter of water.  For the volatile fraction, 5
ml of "organic-free" water should be analyzed by the purge and trap methodology.
One method blank sample should be run with every batch of 20 or fewer samples.
Also, a r.ethoc blank should be run whenever a new source of reagent or solvent
is introduced into the analytical scheme.  Reagents having background levels

                                315<

-------
that interfere with the compounds to be determined must be purified and shewn
to be free of known interferences or replaced with some that are acceptable.
         6.  Field Blank
             It is the responsibility of  the  sampling team to provide the
appropriate field blanks to the analytical team.   For the extractable para-
meters  (B/N, A, P), the minimum requirement is  to provide an appropriate volume
of blank water which has been processed through the sampling equipment in the
same manner as a sample.  The field blank is  then analyzed in the laboratory
as if it were a sample.  When interferences occur,  the analytical results must
be discarded or flagged so as not to result in  the reporting of false positives
         7.  Replicates
             To determine the precision of the method,  a regular program of
analyses of replicate aliquots of environmental samples must be carried out.
At least two replicate aliquots of a well-mixed sample must be analyzed with
each set- of 20 samples or less analyzed at a  given time.   For those parameters
where a sufficient number (15 sets) of positive results are accumulated over
a period of time, precision criteria should be  developed as described below.
             After 15 replicate results have  been obtained,  calculate the.
range (Rj_)  of these results as follows:

                               \ ' Xil - Xi2        '                 (1)

where Rj_ is the difference between the results  of the pair (X^j_ and X^)
from sample i=l through n.  The concentration of  each sample is represented
by the mean:
                                    lv   j.. v   \
                                    I A. -, f A. -;
where Xj_ is the average of the results of the replicate  pair.   A preliminary
estimate of the critical difference  (Hj.) between replicate  analyses for any
specific concentration  (C) can be calculated as:
                                       n      n _
                          RC = 3.27  (C E Ri)/(E XL)                    (3)
                                       i=l    i=l
                                   316<

-------
Fran these data develop a table of such R  values  for various C values that
span the concentration range of interest.
             These preliminary critical difference values may be used to judge
the acceptability of the succeeding replicate  results.   To  do this,  calculate
the mean (X) and difference  (R) between the  replicate results.   Referring to
the table of critical range values developed above,  find the  C nearest to X
and use its R_ to evaluate the accept .ability of  R.   If the  R  is greater than
Rj, the system precision is out of control and the source of  this unusual
variability should be identified and resolved  before continuing with routine
analyses.  Record the results of all replicate analyses and periodically (after
25 to 30 additional pairs of replicate results are obtained),  revise,  update,
and improve the table of critical range values.
         3.  Matrix Effect Mditions to Samples
             These are additions of known amounts  of authentic standards to
the sample.  The samples are then processed  and  analyzed in the same manner
as a sample.  For the convenience of the analyst,  a  "reference"  standard
addition should be provided.  The "reference"  standard should be prepared at
the same time that the samples are being spiked  using the same piper and the
same standard solution or solutions.  The volume of  the "reference"  should
then be adjusted by dilution, if necessary,  to the same extract volume as will
be delivered for the spiked sample.  The reference is extremely valuable in
determining accurate percent recovery because  the  same standard which was
added to the sample can be used for quantitation purposes.  This eliminates
errors which might be introduced because of  discrepancies between spiking
standards and quantitation standards.
             Determine the recovery of the method  for the analysis cf  environ-
mental samples by adding a spike  (Tj_, true value)  sufficient  to approximately
double the background concentration level  (if  known  prior to  extraction)  of
the sample selected earlier for replicate analysis.   If the original ccr.cer.tra-
ticn is higher than the midpoint of the standard curve (range cf the -ethod;,
then the 'Concentration of the spike should be  approximately one-half the original
concentration, which assures that the final  concentration is  within  the linear
ranee of the method.  If the concentration cf  the  ori-ir.a_  Serbia was  net

-------
                                                                       22.
detectable, the concentration of the. spike  should be 5 to 15 times the lewer
limit of detection.  Generally, the concentration present in the sample will
be totally unknown prior to extraction;  therefore,  a spike which is 5 to 15
times above the lower detection limit is recommended.   The volume of standard
added in aqueous solution should not dilute the  sample by more than 10 percent.
The volume of standard added in an organic  solvent solution should be kept
small (100 ul/1 or less)-
             Analyze the sample, calculated the  observed value (OjJ  and the
solution concentration  (Xj.), then calculate the  recovery for the spike as
follows:
                             Pi = 100  (0L - Xi)/Ti                    (4)

where Pj_ is the percent recovery.  If the sample was diluted due to the
addition of the-spike, adjust Xj_ accordingly.
             After determining PI for at least 15 spike results,  calculate
the mean percent recovery  (?) and standard  deviation (Sp)  of the recovery as
follows:
                                 _    n
                                 P - (E  P±)/n            _              (5)
                                             n
'-1 -  (Z
                                                                       (6)
where n = the number of percent recovery values available.
             If the percent recovery of the spike is not within the interval
of ? - 3 S^, the system accuracy is out of control  and the  source of this
systematic error should be identified and resolved  before continuing with
routine analysis.

-------
                                                                       22.
             At least one spiked sample must be  analyzed along with each set
of 20 samples or less that is analyzed at a given time.   This  spiked data must
be obtained for each parameter of interest.  Record the  recovery data of all
spiked analyses and periodically  (every 25  to  30 data points),  revise,  update,
and improve the accuracy criteria.
         9.  Matrix Effect additions to Blank  Water (Method Standard)
             These are additions of known amounts of authentic standards to
the water blank immediately before extraction.   The samples are then processed
and analyzed in the same manner as a sample.   The standards should be approxi-
mately equal to the concentration found in  routine samples.
             Analyze the standard and  calculate  Oj_ (the  observed value) .  The
percent recovery  (Pj_) is then calculated as follows:
                                     100  (0.)
                                Pi«    T_  X                          (7)

where T.. = the true value.
             After determining the Pi  for approximately  15  check standards,
calculate the mean  (P) and standard deviation  (Sp)  of the percentages as
follows:
                                                                       (8)
                                         n

and:
                                  1   n        n
                                  L   I P.2 -  (I P) Vn                 (9)
                                 n-1  " 'i
where n = the number of results  available.
             If  the percent  recovery for succeeding standard additions is r.ct
within the  interval of ?~  - 2 Sp,  the system should be checked for problems.
If crcblans  ex^st, they must be  resolved before continuing with routine analysis.

-------
                                                                       24.
             At least one blank water  standard addition most be analyzed along
with each set of 20 samples or less  that is analyzed at a given time.  These
data must be obtained for each parameter of interest.  Record the recovery of
all blank water standard additions and periodically revise, update, and improve
the accuracy criteria.
        10.  Surrogate Spikes
             These are standards which are added to every sample prior to
analysis.  The standards chosen should be chemically similar to compounds in
the fraction being analyzed.  Also,  the  standards should be compounds which
would not likely be found in environmental samples.   The purpose of the surro-
gate spike is to provide quality control on every sample by constantly moni-
toring the unusual matrix effects, gross sample processing errors,  etc.  The
surrogate spike should not be used as  an internal standard for quantitation
purposes.  Analyze the' spike extract and calculate Oj_ (the observed value) .
The percent recovery (Pj_) is then calculated as follows:
                                     100 (0.)
                                Pi
where Tj_ = the true value.
             After determining the Pj_ for approximately 15 spikes,  calculate
the mean  (P) and standard deviation  (Sp) of the percentages as follows:
                                                                       (12)
                                        u
and
   / ,  |~n         n
"5=rlz  V -  (E  p)'/n
                        sp
where n = the number of results available.
(13)

-------
             If tiie percent recovery for succeeding  spikes  is  not within the
interval of P t 3 Sp, the system should be checked for  problems.  If prcbisrs
exist, they must be resolved before continuing with  routine analysis.   Peccrd
the recovery of all spikes and periodically revise,  ocdate,  and improve the
acceptance criteria as defined in section IV.
        11.  GC/MS cvM-ihi-ation Check
             For the base/neutral fraction, run decafluro-criphenyLphcsphir.e
(DFTPP) daily according to EPA procedures.  The requirement is for  20 nancgrams
of DETPP to meet the specifications..
             For the volatile fraction and the acid  fraction,  run pentaflurc—
bronobenzene  (PFBB) daily according to EPA procedures.   The requirement is for
100 nanograms of PFBB to meet the specifica-cion.
        12.  GC Performance Check
             For the base/neutral fraction, run benzidine daily either separately
or as a part of a standard mixture.  The requirement is to  be  able  to chrocatc-
graph the compound at the 100 nancgram level.
             For the acid fraction, run pentachlorophencl daily either separately
or as part of a standard mixture.  The requixarent is to be able to chraratc-
graph the compound at the 100 nancgram.. level.
             For the pesticide fraction, run Aldrin  daily either separately cr
as part of a standard mixture.  An injection of 100  cicccrams  should give a
recorder response of at least 50 percent full-scale  deflection.
        13.  Inter-Laboratory Quality Control
             In addition to establishing the precision  and  accuracy of the
method and routinely analyzing replicate and spiked  samples, the laboratory zrust
also analyze a quality control  (QC) check sample, at least  once annually, for
parameters of interest as they are available from the Quality  Assurance Branch,
Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory  (Ci.-cirjiati} .

-------
        14.  Quantitation
                           External Standard Method
             The external standard method is recommended  for quantitation of
parameters frcm the pesticide fraction and the volatile fraction.  Prepare
a master calibration curve using a minimum of three standard solutions of
each of the compounds that are to be measured.  Plot concentrations versus
integrated areas or peak heights (selected characteristic ion  for GC/MS or
electron capture response for GC/EC).  One point, on each  curve should approach
the method detection limit.  Once the master set of instrument calibration
curves have been established, they should be verified dally  by injecting at
least one standard solution.  If significant drift has occurred, a new cali-
bration curve will have to be constructed.  The concentration  of the unknown
can be calculated from the slope and intercept of the curve.   If the curve is
linear and the intercept is zero, the. unknown concentration  can be determined
by the following equations:
For extractables:
                      Micrograms/liter

                      '   _  ng standard
                           standard area
(A)   (B)   (Vt)
  {Vi}  (VS}
                      B  *•' sample aliquot area
                      V. = volume of extract injected  (yl)
                      V. = volume of total extract  (ul)
                      V  = volume of water extracted  (ml)
For volatiles:
                          Micrcgrams/liter =
                                           _  (A)	(B)
(14)
                             (15)
                                                V
                          Vo = volume of water purged  (ml)
                                  322*

-------
                             Internal Standard Method

             The internal standard method is recotmended  for quantitaricn cf
parameters from the base/neutral fraction and the acid fraction.
             This method is preferred when  the internal standard meets  the
following conditions:
             a.  Does not interfere with other components
             b.  Elutes close to peaks of interest
             c.  Approximates concentration of unknown
             d.  Structurally similar to unknown

             The utilization of the internal standard  method requires the
periodic determination of response factors  (R) which are  defined as  follcwsL

                                  R = fs^LS.                           (16)
                                      AIS Cg
Ag is the integrated area or peak height of the characteristic  ion for  the
priority pollutant standard.
           integrated area or peak height of  the  characteristic  ion for the
internal standard.
Cjs is the concentration of the priority pollutant standard.

             By adding a known concentration  of internal  standard  (Crg)  to
every sample extract, one  can then calculate  the  concentration of  priority
pollutant (CcO in the extract using:
             The concentration of priority pollutant  in  the  origir>al  sampl
     is given by:
                                       C- VTT
                                  c0 - ^

whera '/r- is the volume of nhe extract and VQ is  the volume of  the  crigiral
samcis.

-------
                                                                       23.
             The response factor  (R) most be determined over ail concsntrad.cn
ranges of standard (Cs) which are being determined.   (Generally,  the amount
of internal standard •?iffif*3 to each extract is the  same  so  that Cj£  ranains
constant.)   This should be done by preparing a calibration chart where the
response factor (R) is plotted against the standard concentration (Cs) using
a minimum of three concentrations over the range of interest.  Once this
calibration plot has been determined, it should be verified daily by injecting
at least one standard solution containing internal standard.   If significant
drift has occurred, a. nevr calibration curve will have to be constructed.
             To quantitate, add the internal standard to the concentrated
sample extract no more than a ferf minutes before the measurement to protect the
standard from losses due to evaporation, adsorption, or chemical reaction.
Calculate the concentration, if unknown, by using  the previous equations with
the appropriate response factor taken from the calibration curve.   (Ideally,
the response factor will hot change with concentration.)
        15.  Quality Assurance Documentation
             Standard formats are to be utilized for reporting quality assurance
data.  One form would summarize all relevant data  concerning_blanks, standard
additions,  and replicates for each parameter  (see  Table 9).   A second form
would summarize surrogate recoveries for each fraction  type (see Table 10)_^
Other forms would provide daily records of GC/MS calibration checks and GC
performance checks.
        16.  Combinations Used for Matrix Effect and Surrogate Spikes
             A.  Listing of Combinations and Concentrates
                 The following Tables 11 through 18 list the required materials
and range of spiking levels for matrix effect spikes and surrogate  spike fcr
all fractions of the 129 priority pollutants.  The following is  a summary of
the requiranents.
                                    324<

-------
                                           Scike Tvce

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Fraction
Purgeables
Adds
Base/Neutrals
Pesticides
Metals
CN~, Phenol
Matrix Effect
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table
11
13
15 (Note: 4 mixes)
16 (Note: 5 mixes)
17
18
Surrogate
Table 12
Table 14
Table 14
None
None
None
     B.   Availability of Spiking Solutions
         Either each laboratory must prepare all matrix effect and surrccazs
spikes or stock solutions are prepared at a central location and distributed
to each laboratory in a given program.  In order to optimize data quality
at the minimum cost, the latter is the best approach.   Region VIZ has provided
such a service in other programs and in the following section is preserving
the details of how they implemented such a program.  If it is determined that
individual laboratories will prepare their own, see Table 19 for possible sources
of standards.
                                    325 <

-------
                                                                       30.
                                   TABLE 9

                         STANDARD QC FORMAT  (example)


                            Parameter Name - Matrix
                        Normal Detection Limit:   10 ppb

Date    Sample £*     Measured Value      Amount  Added     Percent Recovery
10/11
10/11
10/11
10/11
10/11
10/11
1234
1234R
1234SS
1234SB
1234MB
1234FB ' "
40
60
75
45
<10
<10
0
0
50
50
0
0
— .
-
50
90
. -
-
Percent Recovery from Sample: P_ ± 3 Sp =
Percent Recovery from Blank:  ,P.± 2 Sp =
Critical Differences betwe«=n Replicate Analyses:
*R = replicate; S3 = standard addition to- sample; SB = standard addition
 to blank; MB = method blank,- FB = field blank
                                   TABLE 10
                                RECOVERY FOEMAT  (example)

                            Surrogate Name - Matrix
                           Normal Detection Limit:

Date     Sample t      Measured Value      Amount Added     Percent Recovery

10/11     1234    .          40                 50                 80
10/11     1235             '60                 50                120
Percent Recovery from Samples:  £ t 3
Percent Recovery from Blanks?   P ± 2

-------
                                   TABLE 11
                                        FBACTION
                             MATRIX EFFECT SPIKE

Compound                                      Approx. Cone,  in Spike (cpb)
 (1)  Acrolein                                             240
 (2)  Acrylonitrile                                        110
 (3)  Benzene                                               20
 (4)  Brorcdichlorcmethana                                  20
 (5)  Bromoform                                             60
 (6)  Bronomethane                                          60
 (7)  Carbon Tetrachloride                                  20
 (8)  Chlorobenzene                                         20
 (9 )  Chlorodibrcticraethane                                  20
(10)  Chloroethane                                          60
(11)  2-Chloro (ethyl vinyl) ether                           60
(12)  Chloroform                                            20
(13)  Chlorotiethane                                         60
(14)  Dichlor Bifluorcmethane                               60
( 15 }  1 , 1-Dichloroethane                                    20
(16)  1,2-Dichloroethane                                    20
(17)  1,1-Dichloroethylene                                  20
(18)  Trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene                            20
(19)  Dichloronethane                                       20
( 20 )  1 , 2-Dichloropropane                                   2 0
(21)  Cis-l,3-Dichloropropene                               20
(22)  Trans- 1,3-Dichlorcpropene                             20
(23)  Ethylbenzene                                          20
(24)  1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane                    '         SO
(25)  Tetrachloroethylene                                   20
(26)  Toluene                                               20
(21}  1,1, 1-Trichloroethane                                 20
(23)  1,1, 2-Trichlcrcethar.e                                 20
(29)  Trichlcroe'chylene                                     20
(20)  Tr^chlorofl'jornnerhane                                20
(21)  Vir.vl 'Chloride                                        60

-------
                      TABLE- 12
                  PUBGEftBLET FRACTION
                   SUBFCGATE SPIKE
    Caiipjund                   Approx.  Cone,  in Spike (ppb)
cU benzene                                   30
 o
cL toluene                                   30
 o
dj.Q ethylbeizene                             30
branochloranethane                           20
1,4-dichlorofautane                           20
l-chioro-2-bromopropane                      20

-------
                              TABLE 13
                           ACID FPACTION
                       MATRIX EFFECT SQLCTICN
Ccnpound
 (1)   2-Chlorophenol
 (2)   p-Chloro-nv-cresol
 (3)   2,4-Qichlorophenol
 (4)   2,4-DinethyIphenol
 (5)   4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
 (6)   2,4-Dinitrophenol
 (7)   2-Nitrophenol
 (8)   4-Nitrophenol
 (9)   Pentachlorophenol
(10)   Phenol
(11)   2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Approx. Cone. Range of SpU
-------
                                                        24.
                     TABLE 14

               ACED AND BASE/NEDTBAL
                  SURECGAIE SFIKE
    Canaound             Apprax. Cone, in Spike (ppb)
decafluorabiphenyl                    .50
pentafluorophenbl                     100
4-fluoroaniline                       100
                       330-

-------
                                   TABLE 15

                                 BASE/NEUTRAL
                               MKTKEX EFFECT SPI3E
              Conpound

Mixture 1:  1,3-dichlorobenzene
            1,2-dichlarobenzene
            hexachlorobutadiene
            napthalene
            acenapthene
            fluorene
            2,4-dinitrotoluene
            hexachlorobenzene
            anthracene
            diethylphthalate
            pyrene
            crysene
            benzo(a)anthracene

Mixture 2:  1,4-dichlcrobenzene
            bis(2-chloroiscpropyl)ether
            bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
            nitrobenzene
            acenapthylene
            2,6-dinitrotoluene
            4-branophenyl-phenyl ether
            diraethylphthalate
            di-M-butylphthalate
            bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
            3,3'-dichlorobenzidine

Mixture 3:  ben?ndine
            benzo(g,h,i) perylene
            ^nitroscdimethylamine
            di-n-octylphthalate

Mixture 4:  hexachloroethane
            i^riitroso-di-isf-propylainine
            1,2,4-trichlorobenzene
            hexachlorocyclopentadiene
            2-chloronapthylene
            j_3cphorcne
            1,2-diphenylhydraz±ne
            M-nitroscdiphenylaraine
            phenanthrene
            flucranthene
            cur'.• Ibenry 1 phthalate
Approx. Cone. Par.ee of Spike  (ppb)

         10 -  400
         10 -  400
         10 -  400
         10 -  400
         10 -  400
         10 -  400
         30 - 1200
         10 -  400
         10 -  400
         20 -  800
         10 -  400
         20 -  800
         20 -  800

         10 -  400
         20 -  800
         10 -  400
         10 -  400
         10 -  400
         30 - 1200
         20 -  800
         10 -  400
         10 -  400
         10 -  400
         40 - 1600

         40 - 1500
         20 -  800
         30 - 1200
         20 -  300
         10
         30
         10
         20
         10
         40
         20
         20
         10
         10
         20
 400
1200
 400
 800
 400
1500
 800
 800
 400
 400
 300
                                     331<

-------
                                                                      36.
                                   TABLE 16

                               PESTICIDE FRACTION
                              MATRIX £i'£'.ti.T SPIKE
                                        Approx.  Cone.  Range of Spike  (pcb)
Mixture 1:  a-BEC
            g-BHC
            d-BHC
            Heptachlor
            Heptachlor epoxide
            a-endosulfan
            endrin
            p,p'-DDD

Mixture 2:  S-BHC
            AMrin
            p,p'-DDE
            8 endosulf an
            p,p'-DDT

Mixture 3:  Tech grade chlordane

Mixture 4:  Toxaphene

Mixture 5:  PCS 1254
0.1 - 0.5
0.1 - 0.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
.2
.2
.2
.3
,3
.5
1
1
1
1.5
1.5
2.5
0.6 - 3.0

0.1 - 0.5
0.2 - 1.0
0.4 - 2
0.6 - 30
1   - 5

2   - 10

30  - 150

4   - 20
                                 332<

-------
                               TABLE 17

                            METALS FRACTION
                          MKTBIC EFFECT SPIKE
      Compound                   Approx.  Cone.  Range of  ScLke  (ppb)

Flame:*      Beryllium                      1-10
             Cadmium                        5-50
             Chronium                       5-50
             Copper                         5-50
             Nickel                         5-50
             Silver                         5-50
             Zinc                           5-50

Flameless:*  Antimony                       1-10
             Arsenic                      0.5-5
             Lead                           1-10
             Selenium                       1-10
             Thallium                       1-10

Cold Vapor:  Mercury                      0.2 - 2
*Either flame or flameless method may be used depending on concentraticns
 of metals - typical distribution is given.
                               TABLE 18

                        CONVENTIONAL FRACTION
                         MATRIX EFFECT SPIKE
           Material                   Approx. Cor.c. cf Spike (p?b)

            or                                   10 - 100
            Phenol                               10 - 100
                              333<

-------
                                                                       JS.
                                  TABLE 19
                       POSSIBLE SOURCES OF STANDARDS

Aldrich Chemical Co., Milwaukee, Wise..
Analabs, Inc., North. Haven, Conn.
J.T. Baker Chemical Co., Phillipsburgh, N. J.
Chemical Procurement Laboratories, College Point, N.Y.
Columbia Organics Catalog A-*7, Columbia, S.C.
Eastman Kodak Co., Rochester, N.Y.
K&K Rare s Fine Chemicals, Plainview, N.Y.
Nanogens International, P.O. Box 487, Freedom, CA 95019
"analytical Reference Standards and. Supplemental Data for Pesticides and
Other Selected Organic Compounds," EPA-660/9-76H312  (May 1976'), Health Effects
Research Laboratory, Environmental Toxicology Division, Research Triangle Park,
N.C.
R.K. Chemical Co., 2135 Howard Street, Hartville, OH 44632
Tridom Chemical Inc., Hauttauge, N.T..
PCR Research Chemicals, Inc., Gainesville, Fla.
Supelco, Inc., Belief onte, PA.
Chem Service, West Chester, PA..
PolyscienCe, Warrenton, PA.
applied. Science Laboratories, State College, PA.
NOTEr  These sources are not to be interpreted as being endorsed by the EPA.
                                  334<

-------
                                                               19.
 C.   3egicn '7H Stock Solution Supply Program


Summary

The contractor shall run one  duplicate  (same sample run twice), one
reagent blank (laboratory prepared distilled/deionized water), one
method standard (standard added to distilled/deionized water), and one
matrix effect spike  (standard added to  sample) for each batch of samples
collected at a given city.  A field reagent blank will also be collected
and should be treated as a regular sample.  Therefore, the laboratory
should receive 15 samples from the field  for each city.  Twelve of these
will be regular samples, one  will be  a  field blank, one will be a duplicate
sample for the duplicate analyses and the remaining sample will be a
duplicate for the matrix effect spike.

Region VII will supply  two types of quality control solutions to each
contractor-  The first  type of solution is called a surrogate stock
solution.  These stock  solutions contain  non priority pollutant compounds
and are used to detect  gross  problems in  sample work-up.  The second
type of solution is  called a  standard stock solution.  These solutions
contain most of the  priority  pollutantsand are used to estimate the
reliability of reported data.  The quality control solutions provided will
be as follows:

Surrogate Solutions                          Standard Stock Solution

Volatiles     2                               Volatiles   5
Extractables  1                               Base Neutral  4
(acids, base & neutral)                       Acid 1
                                              Pesticide   5
                                              Metals  1
TOTAL   4                                    .TOTAL   16

Each day samples are started, the contractor should transfer an aliquote
(specific volume will be supplied with  solution) from each surrogate
stock solution to a  volumetric and dilute to volume.  An aliquote of
this surrogate working  solution is then added to each sample Just prior
to analyses.

The volatile standard additons are prepared by combining the 5 volatile
stocks, into one volumetric,  diluting to  volume, and spiking the resulting
solution into the blank water or into a sample.  The 4 base/neutral stocks
and the 1 acid stock are combined in  a  similar manner.  Of the 5 cesticide
stocks only 1 is used for spiking purposes at any one time.  These should
be rotated so that all  the pesticides eventually are included in the
quality assurance program. 'One metal solution will be provided which will
be adcec directly, without prior dilution, to the sample or blank water.

These procedures are explained in more details in the following^:a?es.
Please refer any questions to Dr. Robert  Kleopfer (815-274-42S5).

-------
                                                             40.
         INSTRUCTIONS FOK USE OF REGION VII SPIKING SOLUTIONS

Region VII has provided standard spiking solutions and surrogate spiking
solutions.  These are to be used according to the following instructions
per each analytical group and the results are to be reported on the
attached quality assurance report sheet (one sheet per compound).  Each
set of samples processed should include one method blank,  one method
standard at one spiking level (spiked blank water - wait one hour),
and one matrix effect spike at one level (spiked sample - wait one hour),
and one field, duplicate.  All samples are to be spiked with surrogate
solutions as instructed.

In order to eliminate errors caused by inconsistencies in  true spiking
solution concentrations, we suggest that the Spiking solutions also be
used as. quantitation standards in determination of recovery values.
Ttiis can be done readily by preparing a reference standard at the same time
that a sample is spiked.  For example, if 0.2ml  of a spiking solution
is dosed into 1 liter of water sample, extracted and then  concentrated
to 1 ml, then that same spiking solution should be used as the standard
by taking 0.2ntT and adjusting to 1  ml  in volume.
                         336<

-------
     Preparation of Base/Neutral  Spiking Solutions  for Matrix  Effect
                           and Method Standard
I.  General Comments

     A.   The contractor is provided with four 8/N mixes.   The  spikina
solution is prepared by mixing equal volumes of each of the  four mixes
together.

     B.   Spiking levels for the B/N compounds are .2, .4,  .6,  1, 2,
4, and 3 mis of the spiking solution.


II.  B/N Mix I

     A.   Stock Solution
          1.  Mix I was made up in 10* benzene in methylene  chloride.
          2.  Concentrations of components  in stock:

     Comoound                                Concentration
1,3 dichlorobenzene                            200  ug/ml
1,2 dichlorobenzene                            200  yg/ml
hexachlorobutadiene                            200  yg/ml
napthalene                                     200  yg/ml
acenapthene                                    200  yg/ml
fluorene                                       200  yg/ml
2,4 dinitrotoluene                             600  yg/ml
hexachlorobenzene                              200  yg/ml
anthracene                                     200  yg/ml
diethylphthalate                               400  yg/ml
pyrene                                         200  yg/ml
chrysene                '                      400  yg/ml
benzo(a)anthracene                             400  yg/ml

     B.  Spiking Solution
          1.  After diluting Mix I with equal  volumes  of  the other
three compounds, the concentrations will  then  be  1/4 of the values just
reported.
III.  B/N Mix II

     A.   Stock Solution
          1.   Mix II was made up in 101 benzene in  methylene chloride.
          2.   Concentration of components in  stock?"
                          337<

-------
                                                           42.
     Compound                                Concentration,
1 ,4 dichlorobenzene                            200
bis (2 chloroisopropyl) ether                  400
bis (2-chloroethyl) ether                      200  v9/ml
nitrobenzene                                   200  yg/ml
acenapthylene                                  200  yg/ml
2,6 dinitrotoluene                             500  yg/ml
4-bromophenyl -phenyl ether                     400  yg/ml
dime thylphthal ate                              200  yg/ml
di-N-butylphthalate                            200  yg/ml
bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate                   200  yg/ml
3,3'dichlorobenridine                          800
     B.  Spiking Solution
          1..  All above concentrations will be quartered after spiking
solution is made up.
IV.  B/N Mix III

     A.  Stock Solution
          1.  Mix III is made up in 10% benzene in methylene chlorids
          2.  Concentrations of components in stock!

     Compounds                               Concentration

benzidine                                      800 ug/ml
benzo(g,h,i) perylene                          400 yg/ml
N-nitrosodimethylamine                         600 yg/ml
di-n-octylphthalate                            400. yg/ral

     B.  Spiking Solution
          K  After diluting Mix M with equal volumes of the other
three mixes, the above concentrations will be quartered.


V.  B/N Mix IV

     A.  Stock Solution
          1..  Mix IV is made up in 102 benzene in methyl ene chloride.
          2.V  Concentrations of components in stock?

     Compounds                               Concentration

hexachloroethane                               200 yg/ml
H-nitroso-di-N-propylamine                     600 yg/ml
1 ,2,4-trichlorobenzene                         200 yg/ml
hexachlorocyclopentadiene                      400 ug/ml
                        33S<

-------
     Compounds                              Concentration

2-chloronapthylene                          -  200 uq/mT
isophorone                                    800  */ml
1,2 diphenylhydrazine                         400 y|/ml
N-nitrosodiphenylamine                        400  J/ml
phenanthrene                                   200 ug/ml
fluoranthene
butyl benzyl phthal ate

     3.   Spiking  Solution
          1.   The  above  concentrations will be quartered.
                           339<

-------
                                                          44.
   Preparation  of Pesticide Spiking Solutions  for Matrix Effect Spike
                           and Method Standard
I.   General  Comments

     A.   There are  five pesticide stock solutions.   When the spike
solutions are made  up from these stocks, only one of the solutions
is  spiked at a time.   Otherwise pesticide peaks will  overlap on a GC
run.   So when a certain pesticide is  suspected to be present in an
unknown, spike with the-mi* containing that pesticide.

     B.   All  spiking  levels for the pesticides are  the  same.  1, 2,
3,  4, or 5 mis of spiking solution should be pipetted into 1 liter
of sample (matrix effect spike) or. into 1 liter of organic free deion-
ized water (method  standard).
II.  Pesticide Mix I

     A-  Stock Solution
          1.   The contractor is provided with a 100X concentrated stock
solution.  This stock solution is made up in hexane.

     B.  Spiking Solution
          1.   Preparation
               -a.  Make a 1/100 dilution on the stock solution into
either hexane or iso-octane.  Be sure all  solvents used are pesticide
quality.
          2.   Concentrations of compounds present in 1/100 dilution:

     Compound                                Concentration
a-BHC                                          TOO pg/ul
g-BHC                                          TOO pg/ul
d-BHC                                          200 pg/ul
Heptachlor                                     200 pg/yl
Heptachlor epoxide                             200 pg/uT
a-endosulfan                                   300 pg/ul
dieldrin                                       300 pg/ul
endrin                                         500 pg/ul
p,p' ODD                                       600 pg/ul


III.  Pesticide Mix II

     A.   Stock Solution
          1.  Stock solution provided is 100X as concentrated as the
spiking solution to be used, and-is in hexane.

     B.   Spiking Solution
          1.  Preparation
                     340<

-------
                                                             45.
               a.  Make a 1/100 dilution of the stock provided into
either hexane or iso-octane.  Be sure to use pesticide grade solvents,
          2.  Concentrations 'of compounds in spiking solution:

     Compound                                Concentration

S-3HC                                          TOO pg/ul
Aldrin                                         200 pg/ul
p.p1 DDE                                       400 pg/ul
3 endosulfan                                   600 pg/ul
p.p1 DDT                                       1 ng/ul


IV.  Pesticide Mix III

     A.  Stock Solution
          1.  Stock solution provided to contractors is 10X as concen-
trated as spiking solution to be used.

     B.  Spiking Solution
          1.  Preparation
               a.  Make a 1/10 dilution of stock solution into hexane
or  iso-octane.
          2.  Concentration in mix after 1/10 dilution:

     Mixture                                 Concentration
tech. grade chlordane-                          2 n
V.  Pesticide Mix IV

     A.  Stock Solution
          1.  Stock solution provided is 10X as concentrated as spiking
solution to be used and is in hexane.

     B.  Spiking Solution
          1.  Preparation
               a.  Make a 1/10 dilution of stock solution provided into
either hexane or iso-octane (pesticide, grade quality).
          2.  Concentration in spiking solution:

     Mixture                                 Concentration

toxaphene-                                      30 ng/ul


VI.  Pesticide Mix V

     A.  Stock Solution
          1.  Contractors are provided with a 10X concentrated solution
in hexane.

-------
                                                           46.
     B.   Spiking  Solution
          1.   Preparation
               a.  Make a 1/10 dilution of stock solution provided into
either hexane-or  iso-octane  (pesticide grade quality).
          2.   Concentration  in spiking solution:

     Mixture                                 Concentration

PCS-1254                                      4 ng/ul
                       342-

-------
                                                             4".
                                   8

            Base/Neutral  - Acid Surrogate  Spiking  Solution
I.  Stock
     A.  The surrogate stock solution  provided  to  the  contractor  contains
decafluorobiphenyl, pentafluorophenol, and 4-fluoroanil ine.   It  is  made
up in 105 benzene in methylene chloride.

     B.  Concentrations of compounds in stock.

     Comoound                                Concentration
decafluorobiphenyl                             .5  mg/ml
pentafluorophenol                              1 mg/ml
4-fIuoroanil ine                                1 mg/ml
II.  Spiking Levels

     A.  The stock solution provided is also the spiking solution.

     B.  TOO ye of this stock or spiking solution is  spiked  into  every
sample including quality control samples.
                           343<

-------
                                                           48.
         Preparation of Acid Solution for Matrix Effect Spike
                          and Method Standard
I.  Acid Mix

     A.  Stock
          1.  There is only one acid stock and it is in methylene chloride
          2.  The stock solution is 1QX as concentrated as the spiking
solution to be used.

     B.'  Spiking Solution
          T.  Preparation
               a.  Make a T/10 dilution of the stock in methylene chloride
          2.  Spiking Levels
               a.  2, 4, 6, or 8 mis of the spiking solution is spiked
into 1 liter of sample (matrix effect spike) or 1 liter of organic free
D.I. H2Q (method spike).
          3.  Concentration of components in spiking solution.
     Compound

2-nitrophenol
2-chlorophenol
2,4- dimethyl phenol
phenol
2,4,6 trichlorophenol
2,4 dichlorophenol
p-chloro-fl-cresol
pentachlorophenol
2,4 dinitrophenol
4-nitrophenol
4,5 dinitro-o-cresol
Concentration

  20 yg/ml
  10 yg/ml
  15 jig/ml
  10 vg/ml
  17 yg/ml
  12 yg/ml
  18 yg/ml
  55 yg/ml
  800 yg/ml
  250 vg/ml
  450 yg/ml
                            344<

-------
                                  10

               Preparation of Surrogate Spike Solutions
                   to be Used for Volatile Organics
A.  Reagents
     1 .  Dg benzene
     2.  D« toluene
     3. "Dfo ethyl benzene
     4.  Supelco Mix - Catalog #4-8823 contains 20mg/m1 each in 1  mi
MeOH, contains broraothlorome thane , 1.4 dichlor-obutane and l-chloro-2-
bromopropene.
     5.  Reagent grade methanol
     6.  Organic free water

B.  Apparatus
     1.  Volumetric flasks, clean and baked out at 180°C and cooled,
lOral and 25ml  in size.
     2.  Hamilton syringe - gas tight, lOOul size.

C.  Preparation of Deuterated Stock Solution
     1.  Into a clean 25ral volumetric flask carefully add about lEml
MeOH.
     2.  Add lOOul DS benzene.
     3.  Add IQOyl Dg toluene.
     4.  Add TOOul DIQ ethyl benzene.
     5.  Dilute to volume with MeOH.
     6.  Stopper, mix well, store in a protected atmosphere in a refrig-
erator.

Approximate concentrations of deuterated stock solutions:
     Dg benzene » 3515 ppm
     Dg toluene = 3468 ppm
         ethyl benzene *  3469 ppra
D.  Preparation of Working Surrogate Spike Solution
     1.  Into^ 10ml volumetric flask that contains 10ml  organic free
water, -add 80yl deuterated stock solution.
     2.  Add lOyl Supelco surrogate spike solution.
     3.  Mix by inverting three times.
     4.  Add 5ul of surrogate spike solution to each '5ml  sample being
analyzed by purge and trap followed by GC/MS.
     5.  Record total ion content for each spike and monitor spikes
throughout the day.

Concentration of spikes are approximate.
     Dg benzene = 28 ppb
     DS toluene = 28 ppb
     D]o ethyl benzene =• 23 ppb
     bromochloromethane = 20 ppb
     1 .i dichlorobutane = 20 ppb
     1 -cnl oro-2-bromopropene = 20 ppb


                            345<

-------
                                                             30.

                                  11

              Preparation of Volatile Organic Standards

Due to the nature (volatile organic compounds) and the number (31),
the standard reference mix for volatile organics is prepared by u'sing
the Supelco purgable mixes as stock solutions.

Stock Solutions:

     A.  Purgable A, catalog #4-8815, each constituent at 0.2 mg/ml
in methanol.  From Supelco.  Contains the following:  Methyl ens chloride,
trichloroethylene, 1,1,-dichloroethylene, 1,1-dichlcroethane , 1,1,2-
trichloroethane, dibromochloromethane, 'chloroform, tetrachloroethylene,
carbon tetrachloride, chlorobenzene, 1,2-dichloropropQfe.

     B.  Purgable B, catalog. #4-8816, each constituent at 0.2 mg/ml
in methanol.  Obtained from Supelco.  Contains the following:  Trichloro-
fluoromethane, cis-1,3-dichloroprop.ene, benzene, trans-1,2-dichloro-
ethylene, 1,2-dichloroethane, bromodichloromethane, toluene, trans-1,3-
dichloropropene, ethyl benzene.

     C.  Purgable C, catalog #4-8817, each constituent at 0.2 mg/ml
in methanol.  Obtained from Supelco.  Contains the following:  Chloro-
methane, dichlorodifluoromethane, bromomethane, vinyl chloride, chloro-
ethane.

     D.  Acrolein stock, accurately weigh about SOOmg into a 100ml
volumetric flask which contains about 75ml MeOH.  Dilute to volume
with methanol (cone. 6.O&.mg/ml-supplied).

     E.  AeryIonitrtle stock,  accurately weigh about 1.6g into a 100ml
volumetric flask which contains about 75ml MeOH.  Dilute to volume with
methanol (cone.  11.181 mg/ml supplied).

     F.  2-Chi oroe thy! vinyl ether stock, "Iccura-tely weigh about lOOmg
into a 10ml volumetric flask containing MeOH.  Dilute to volume with
methanol (conc» 11.6 mg/ml supplied).

Working Standard

Into a 2ml screw cap vial, which has been baked out at 180°C for one hour
and allowed to cool, add:
          1.  lOOul MeOH
          2.  200yl Purgable A
          3.  200yl MeOH
          4.  200WT Purgable 3
          5.  200U1 MeOH
          6.  SOOyl Purgable C
          7-  lOOyl MeOH
          8.  20U1 Acrylonitrile stock
          9.  lOOyl MeOH
          10.  SOul Acrolein stock
          11.  lOOwl MeOH


                            346<

-------
                                   12

          12.  lOyl 2-chloroethylvinyl  ether stock
          13.  90ul HeOH

Quickly add each.   Do not let needle of syringe below the  surface of "he
solvent.   Touch sides of vial for draining.  Label  carefully.   Stopper
tightly.   Store in freszer under activated charcoal.   Amounts  may be halved
depending on need.  Prepare workfng standard monthly.

5yl  or working standard is spiked into  Sral deionized  water which  is
then analyzed by purge and trap and GC/MS.  This (5ul)  represents a
spike having the following composition:

     Compound                              Amount  (ug/1  in gob)

Purgable  A group                                   20
Punjabi e  B group                                   20
Purgable  C                                         60
Acrolein                                            243
Acrolynitrile                                      112
2-chloroethylvinyl ether                           58
                           34'

-------
                                                                       52.
T7   PESFOHfflNCE CKETSKIA
     A.  Introduction
         The data generated for each fraction was compared at an EGD meetina
in Norfolk,  Va.  The data represent 10,000  points and were primarily qeneratsd
by the following laboratories:
         1.   AOL Inc.,  Cambridge,  Ma.
         2.   Carborundum Co.,  Sacramento, Ca.
         3.   EPA-Begion VH, Kansas City, Kansas
         4.   Versar Inc., Springfield,- Va.
         Smaller amounts of data were developed at three other laboratories
for a total of seven participants.  The samples that were spiked with matrix
effect and surrogates range from, ground water to PCTW effluents and timber
and paper product waste.
         The data can be used, to develop a  set of control limits, both Upper
Control Limits (DCL)  and Lower Control Limits (LCL)  for priority pollutant
analysis.  Sufficient data is  presented to'  evaluate both the operation of the
laboratory via method spikes and blanks and the impact  of a particular matrix
via the duplicate spikes.  The base data generated represent vastly varying
conditions and matrices and is quite useful.   Most control limits would be
expected to decrease, i.e., improve, as methods are improved and laboratory
experience is gained.

     B.  Summary, of Control Limits for Matrix Effect Spikes
         The data, and tables are directly from the Region VII presentation
and are to be used as control  limit guides.
                              UCL  = 2 Sp
                              LCL  = 3 Sp
For example, consider the method spike for  benzene (data fron Table 21).
                                   348<

-------
                 In the Method Standard       In the Matrix Spike
                        89   12                    93   24
         UCL       89 +• 3(12) =125             93 4- 3(24) = 165
         LCL       89 - 3 (12) - 53              93 .- 3 (24) = 21
Therefore, within a given set of samples and control solutions, a recovery for
benzene in the method standard between 53% - 125% or in the matrix spike between
21% - 165% is said to be in control.  Any data outside these limits need careful
examination and probable re-analysis.  The Tables 20 through 25 give all data
relevant to matrix spike recovery.

     C.  Summary of Control Limits for Surrogate Spikes
         The priority pollutant surrogates are presented in Table 26.  The
data base upon which to make decisions is much smaller here than for the ra-crix
effect spike.  In practice, the data generated by surrogates gives the analyst
a real-time instantaneous look at the operation of the overall analytical
systan in every sample.  This instantaneous information is the most important
reason for the retention of the surrogates.
         For the longer term record, the upper and lower control., limits are
calculated in the same way as for matrix effect spikes.
                              349<

-------
                                                                     54.
              TABLE  20.   INTRALABORATORY COMPARISON
Priority
Pollutant
Fraction*5
Volatile
(MS)
Volatile
Sample Spike
Acid (MS)
Acid Sample
Blank
B/N-(MS)
B/N Sample
Spike
Pesticide
(MS)
Pesticide
Sample Spike
Metals (MS)
Metals
Sample Spike
Cyanide (MS)
Cyanide
Sample Spike
Phenol ics
(MS)
Phenol ics
Sample Spike
LAB
1
88+21
82+24
90 V]8
92+34
95+25
84+18
73+8
69+7
113+37
100+20
103+14
101+12
10+13"
93+15
LAS LAB
II III
95+5
101+9 .93+.! 3
89+5
72+10 62+1 Z
78+41
61+22 55+24
74+19
51+18 33+10
-
103+14
-
-
97+6
98+10
LAB LAB LAB
IV V VII
100+8 -
107+_9 -
57+.14 82+16 -
60+15 84+; 7 -
77+J 5 -
68+.16 - 63+J3
88+8
93+.S
103+8 -
92+7
103+8 -
93+J6 -
100+_7 -
97+_9
Averag
90+_13
92+_15
84+13
76+19
84+_25
68+_21
78+11
59+11
108+22
96+Jl
103+7
96+14
101+_8
96+_11
a)   The values are in units of percent recovery (P) plus or minus  (+J one
standard deviations (Sp).
b)   MS refers to the method standard or the standard addition  to blank water.
Sample spike refers to the standard addition to a sample.
c)   P and Sp are weighted averages based on the number of data points
contributed by each laboratory.

                              35CK

-------
                   TABLE 21.   PURGEA3LE  ORGANICS
Comoound
Acrolein



Acrylonitrile



Benzene



Bromodi ch1oromethane



Bromofonn



Bromomethane



Carbon Tetrachlorfde



Chlorobenzene



Chlorodibromomethane



Chloroethane



Chloroform



Chioromethane



Oichlorodifluoromethane



1,1-Oichloroethane



1,2-Dichloroethane



1,1-Dichloroethylene



trans-1,2-Oichloroethylene



Dichloromethane



1 ,2-Oichloropropane



cis-1,3-Oichloropropene-



trans  -1-3-Di'chloropropene



Ethyl benzene
Method13
Standard
774-30
96+.31
89+12
9 7 +11
94^14
90+16
91+23
94+23
86+12
67+JZ2
90+18
91+.22
108+11*
83^10
102^12
74+_24
90+25
82+46
94+_26
95+15
91+_13
109+19
Standard0
Spike
32*30
1 02+_28
93+_24
103+_31
88+12
78+15
91+_33
103+24
99+17
60+_23
91+26
64+_28
1144-8*
87+_21
103+27
80+32
85+35
66+66
99*30
98+20
93-16
106-28
                           351<

-------
                                                                     56.
                       Continuation of Table 21
                                       Method                    Sample
Compound                               Standard                  Spike
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane               31+31                     73+31
Tetrachloroethylene                     97^13                     99+25
Toluene                                 96+22                     97+_25
1 ,.1,1 -Tri chl oroethane                   92^21                     94+_36
1,1,2-Trichloroethane                  102_+14                     103±19
Tri chloroethyl en*                      106+14                     110+22
Trichlorofluoromethane                  59+23                     67+_48
Vinyl Chloride                         103+30                     79+22
a) The values are in terms of P _+ Sp.   Data from 2-4 laboratories have been
averaged except where noted with an (*) asterik.  In general  the concentration
added ranged from 10 to 1000 parts per billion.
b) Standard addition to blank water.
c) Standard addition to sample.
*0ata from only one lab were available.

-------
                     TABLE 22.   ACID  FRACTION3
COMPOUND
2-Chlorophenol
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
4,6-Oinitro-o_-cresol
2,4-Oinitrophenol
2-Nitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
Pentachlorphenol
Phenol
2,4,6-Trichlorphneol
METHOD13
STANDARD
80+_22
96*16
86+24
7U19
87+34
89+22
95+22
65+33
87+24
61+J1
91+22
SAMPLED
 SPIKE
  71+23
  99*19
  84^23
  72+.16
 102*23
  92*_40
  87+22
  59+46
  84*_22
  54^24
  30*24
a)  The values are in terms of P _+ Sp.   Data  from 2-5 laboratories have
been averaged.  In general  the concentation added ranged from 20 to 2500
parts per bil1 ion.
b)  Standard addition to blank water.
c)  Standard addition to sample.
                            353<

-------
                                                                     58.
                   TABLE  23.   BASE/NEUTRAL FRACTION3-
Compound
Acenaphthene
Acanapthylene
Anthracened
Benzidine
Benzo(a)anthracenee
Benzo(b)fluoranthene^
Berizo(lc}fluoranthene^
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzyl  Butyl Phthalate
Bis(2-chloroethyl) Ether
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)  Ether
Bis(2-ethy1hexyl) PtithaUte
4-8romophenyl  Phenyl Ether
2-Chioronaphthalene
Chrysene8
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Di-n-butyl  Phthalate
1,2-Oichlorobenzene
1,3-Oichlorobenzene
1,4-Oichlorobenzane
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
Method0
Standard
90+22
83+.2Z
98+20
44+27
105+33
96+68*
96+68
90+.22
49+39
98+48
15^136
70+33
80+25
88+20
105+33
80+42
80+32
65+24
67+_21
67+_22
71+85
Sampl ec
Spike
78+24
79+27
79+25
40+29
51+24
41+_21
47+27
43+21
49+22
30+_49
96+88
66+50
63+_25
79+21
77+_27'
36+_29
58+27
65+_27
62+_20
53+21
62+45
                           354<

-------
                   Continuation  of Table  23
Compound
Diethyl Phthalate
Dimethyl Phthalate
2,4-Oi nitrotoluene
2,6-Oinitrotoluene
Di-n-octyl Phthalata
1,2-Oiphenylhydrazine
(and/or Azobenzene)
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Hexachloroethane
Isophorone
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
N-nitrosodipheylamine
(and/or Diphenylamine)
N-N i trosodi -_n_-propyl ami ne
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Method0
Standard
71^37
43+_37
122+_55
115+41
84+_44
9.7+26
111+26
98+24
98+31
76+26
38+28
63+22
66+36
109+14
83+_24
106+_31
72+22
Samplec
S D i k e
65+37
66*43
94*_45
104*_35
38*32
91*_32
63+20
38+25
76+31
77*_45
27+_10
53+23
67^22
40+21
89*51
77^51
66+25
86+34
98+_20
142+_41
74+22
71^22
7920
                              59*24
a)  The values are in terms of P + Sp.   Data  from  2-5  laboratories  have  been
averaged except where noted with an (*)  asterik.   In general  the  concentration
added ranged from 10 to 500 parts per billion.
b)  Standard addition to blank water.
c)  Standard addition to sample.
d.e,f) These isomers pairs  are not separted by  packed  column  GC.  Also m^-ss
data are not sufficiently unique to allow  differentiation,               "
•Data from only one lap were available-

-------
                                                                     50.
                    TABLE 24..  PESTICIDE  FRACTION*
Compound
Aldrin
atpha-BHC
beta-BHC
gamma-BHC
deltaTBHC
Chlordane
4,4' -ODD
4,4' -ODE
4, 4 '-DDT
Dieldrin
Endosulfan I
Endosulfart II
Endosulfane Sulfate
Endrfn
Endrfn Aldehyde
Heptachlor
HeptachTor Epoxide
PCS
Toxapnene
Methodb
Standard
72+13
78+13.
79+21
78+; 4
82+J6
81+17*
82+; 4
76+14
85+17
71+14
65+14
67+19
74+^39*
82+25
64+76*
72+12
82+14
83 +11*
89+12*
Samplec
Spike
55+12
55+12
57+22
64+_1 1
61+16
39+_9*
62+; 6
57±1 8
76+26
62+16
61+13
66+14
84+_30*
68+18
34+_39*
49+12
65+11
42+13
-
a)  The values are irt terms of P +_ Sp.   Data from 2-4 laboratories have  been
averaged except where noted with- an (*)asterik.  In general  the concentration
added ranged  from. 0.1 to 100 parts per  billion.
b)  Standard  addition to blank water.
c)  Standard  addition to sample.
*0ata from only one lab were available.


                             356<

-------
                                                                     51.
PARAMETER
           TABLE 25.   METALS,  CYANIDE,  AND  PHENOLICSa
Antimony

Ars.enic

Beryllium

Cadm'i urn

Chromium

Copper

Lead

Mercury^

Nickel

Selenium

Silver

Tn a-11 i urn

Zinc

Cyanide

Total Phenols
METHOD^
STANDARD

   61+47*

  1 20+20

   89+16

   91+J8

   99+30

  136j+70

  116+32

   83+24

   84+62

  112+15

  1 10+25

   99+_33*

  122+44
  101+8
SAMPLEC
 SPIKE

  103+_24

   97+25

   94+_20

   98+_23

  106+25

   99+24

   93+_25

   79+38

  101+_26

   93+_20

   80+_25

   95+23

   106+^37

   96+H

   96+ II
a)  The values are in terms of P _+ Sp.  Data from 2-3 laboratories  have  been
averaged exept where noted  with an (*) asterik.  In genral  the  concentration
added ranged from 10 to 1000 parts per billion.
b)  Standard addition to blank water.
c)  Standard addition to sample.
d)  Analyzed by the cold vapor technique.

*0ata from only one lab were available.
                        357<

-------
                                                                    62.
           TABLE 26.   PRIORITY  POLLUTANT  SURROGATES3
Compound                   LAB  Illb
(Purgeable Orgnaics)
dg-Benzene
Bronochloromethane
d-Chloroform               139+_96
1,4-Dichlorobutane
d^-l,2-Oichloroethane      119.+29
dj-Oichloromethane         146+55
dig-£thylbenzene           102+25
f\ uorbenzene               96+20
dg-Toluene
d3-l,l,l-Tn'chloroethane   117^41
(Acids).
2-Fluorphenol                76+36
Pentafluorphenol             84+J30
d5-Phenol                   55+20
Trifluoro-in-cresol          72+_42
(Base/Neutral)
Decaf 1 uorobi phenyl           39+_l 8
da-Nepthalene                76+22
2-fluornaphthelene          75+20
1-fTuronaphthelene          69+18
di2-benzo(a) anthracene      68+_16
2-flurobi phenyl              63+_5
        ne                  57+_36
                           358<
LAB
 93+22
 91+20

 85+24
LAS VIII
 94+18
 92+18
 50+22
 101+39
  41 + 29
   46+13

-------
                  Continuation of  Table  26
                                                 53.
Compound
LAB IIIb
LAS IV<=
LAB VI1
2-fluroaniline       74^39

dg-nitrobenzene      7(3+21
a)  The values are in terms of P _* Sp.  The concentration added  ranged from
20 to 200 parts per billion.
b)  The matrix for these  surrogates included influent and effluent  samples
from 12 different industrial categories.
c)  The matrix for these  surrogates included POTW, detergent,  and chemical
disposal industries.
d)  The matrix for these  surrogates included POTW samples only.
                            353<

-------
SECTION IV
     360<

-------
        PRIORITY  POLLUTANT METHODOLOGY
           QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW
             Robert  D. Kleopfer*
              Jerry  R. Dias and
              Billy  J. Fairless
United States  Environmental Protection Agency
            Region VII Laboratory
               25 Funston Road
          Kansas City, Kansas  66115
               361<

-------
c-              ABSTRACT
t
  e
                Initial quality assurance statistics are presented for the priority
                pollutants,  the statistics are based on over 10,000 data  points
                contributed by seven laboratories.  The average recovery of all the
                organic prioirty pollutants from industrial  effluents is 73 per cent
                with a standard deviation of 26 per cent.  Data are summarized for
                metals* cyanides, phenolics, and the specific organic compounds which
                are divided into four fractions.  Recommended control  limits are  given
                along with a summary of data for surrogate recoveries.   The results
                have permitted identification of the variables associated  with EPA's
                analytical protocol.

-------
             INTRODUCTION
             In compliance with a consent decree emanating  from  civil court actions
             brought against the Environmental  Protection Agency (EPA) by concerned
             organizations, EPA has developed a list of 129 priority  pollutants with
             the goal of establishing industrial effluent limitations and guidelines.*
             This paper will summarize the results of over  10,000 measurements collected
                                                                                     /
             by seven laboratories on 104 of the 1U organic priority pollutants, all
             the metals (13), and total phenol  and cyanide.  (Actually there are 130
             priority pollutants if one differentiated 1,3-dichloropropene into cis
             and trans isomers.)  The seven different ArocVors are  reported collectively
             as PCB's while three base/neutral  compounds, two volatile orgnaic compounds,
             and asbestos are not included in this report.   The  data  assembled herein
             has permitted identification of probable problem areas and provides an initial
*"'           estimate of the accuracy and precision of the  EPA analytical methodology^ for
             the priority pollutants.
                                         363<

-------
r
               Analytical Methodology
               The screening of wastewater for 114 organics  is  accomplished by analyses
               of five different fractions.2  The fractions  are pesticides  (26 compounds),
               base/neutrals (46 compounds), acids (11  phenols),  purgeables (29 volatile
               organics),  and direct aqueous injection  fraction (2 compounds).

               The base/neutrals (B/N) include compounds  such as  1,4-dichlorobenzene,
               benzidine,  and benzo(a)pyrene.  These  compounds  are extracted  from basic
               aqueous solution with methylene chloride.   The concentrated extracts, are
               analyzed by GC/MS on a 1J SP-2250 column.   Columns packed with 3% OV-17
               and 3J SP-2250-DB have also been used  effectively.

               The acid fraction (A) consists of 11 phenols  ranging  from phenol itself
               to pentachlorophenol.  These are determined by extraction of acidic solution
               with methylene chloride and analysis by  GC/MS techniques.  The preferred
               column packing for this analysis is 1% SP-1240-DA.

               The pesticide fraction (P) is prepared by  extraction  with 15%  methylene
               chloride in hexane.  The pesticides are  initially  screened by  gas chroma-
               tography with electron capture detection.3 Any  compounds which are tentatively
               identified  by that technique must be confirmed by  GC/MS.

               The purgeable organics, which include  compounds  ranging in volatility
               from methyl  chloride to ethyl  benzene, are measured using a purge and
               trap analytical  technique.  In this method, the  volatile organics are swept

-------
from 5ml of sample with an Inert gas.  The purged organlcs are  retained

on a trap consisting of Tenax GC and Silica Gel.   These organics  are  then

heat desorbed onto an analytical column consisting of 0.25 Carbowax 1500

on Carbopak C with a 3% Carbowax 1500 precolumn.   Again, mass spectrometry

is used for the detection.



Finally, because of their high water solubility,  acrolein and acrylonitrile

are determined by direct aqueous injection on Chromosorb 101  with mass

spectrometric detection.  However, more recent work has shown that these
                                             /
compounds can also be measured by the purge and trap technique.*



Identification is based on the appearance of mass chromatograms  (extracted

ion current profiles) for three characteristic ions for each  compounds.

As an example, for the three dichlorobenzene isomers, the molecular

ions at 146 and 148 and the fragment ion at 113 are used for  identification

and quantification.  The ions must appear at the correct retention time

with the correct relative responses in order to be considered a  positive

identification.  Quantisation is based on external standard methods for

the volatile organics and pesticide fractions and internal standard methods

for the base/neutral and acid fractions.  The internal standard for these

fractions is fully deuterated anthracene which has a molecular  ion occurring

at mass 188.


The metals are analyzed by flame!ess atomic absorption (AA) and cyanide

and total phenols are colorimetrically determined.5  Cyanide  is measured

-------
f-~-             colorimetrically by converting to cyanogen chloride with chloramine-T
                which reacts with pyridine to give a product that forms a  colored
                complex with barbituric acid.  Total phenol  is  colorimetrically determined
                                                                               \
                by oxidizing with potassium ferricyanide to give  quinones  that condense
                with 4-aminoantipyn'ne to form colored complexes.

                Quality Assurance Requirements
                The original priority pollutant methodology document^  specified several
                quality assurance (QA) requirements, but additional features were sub-
                sequently added^t?.  These requirements include the following:

                1.   Method Blank
                The method blank is defined as an appropriate volume of "organic-free"
                water which has been processed exactly as a sample (same glassware,
 (£
 ^^            reagents, solvents, etc.).  For the extractable parameters (B/N, A, P)
                this would require extraction of one liter of water.   For  the volatile   -
                fraction, 5ml  of "organic-free" water should be analyzed by the purge
                and trap methodology.   One method blank sample  should  be run with every
                batch of 20 or fewer samples.  Also, a method blank should be run whenever
                a new source of reagent or solvent is introduced  into  the  analytical scheme.
                Reagents having background levels that interfer with the compounds to be
                determined must be purified, and shown to be acceptable or  replaced with
                some that are acceptable.

-------
r

£"             2.  Field Blank
               It 1s the responsibility of the sampling team to  provide the appropriate



               field blanks to the analytical team.   For the extractable  parameters (B/N,



               A, P) the minimum requirement 1s to provide an appropriate volume of blank



               water which has been processed through the sampling  equipment in the same



               manner as a sample.  The field blank is then analyzed  in the laboratory '



               as 1f 1t were a sample.  When inteferences occur, the  analytical results



               must be discarded or flagged so as not to result  in  the reporting of false



               positives.  Field blanks for the volatiles consists  of "organic-free" water
                                                            t


               which has been sent from the laboratory to the sampling site and retained



               with the samples.  The purpose is to check on possible contamination of



               the sample by permeation of volatiles through the septum seal.  Sample



               blanks should be protected with activated carbon  during transit and during



               storage in the laboratory.





               3.  Replicates



               To determine the precision of the method, a regular  program of  analyses



               of replicate aliquots of environmental samples must  be carried  out.  At



               least two replicate aliquots of a well mixed samples must  be analyzed with



               each set of 20 samples or less analyzed at a given time.   For those parameters



               where a sufficient number of positive results are accumulated over a period



               of time, precision criteria should be developed.   A  minimum of  15

                                              *

               replicates at a particular concentration or concentration  range where linearity



               exists is required to start an on-going program for  QA and subsequent estimates









                                             367<:

-------
r
               of precision.
               4.  Standard Additions  to  Samples
               These are additions  of  known amounts of authentic standard to the sample.
               The samples  are  then processed and analyzed in the same manner as a sample.
               The percent  recovery is then determined as described in reference 6.   At
               least one spiked sample is analyzed along with each set of 20 samples or
               less.  Spiked  data are  obtained for each parameter of interest.
               5.  Standard Addition to Blank Water (Method Standard)
                                "  '        .                *
               These are additions  of  known amounts of authentic standards to the water
               blank before extraction.   The samples are then processed and analyzed in
               the same manner  as a sample.  The standard should be approximately
               equal  to the concentration found in routine samples.  The percent recovery
               is determined  as described in reference 6.  At least one method standard
               must be analyzed along  with each set of 20 samples or less.

               6.  Surrogate  Spikes
               These are standards  which  are added to every sample prior to analysis.
               The standards  chosen should be chemically similar to compounds in the
               fraction being analyzed.   Also, the standards should be compounds which
               would not likely be  found  in environmental samples.  The purpose of the
               surrogate spike  is to provide quality control on every sample by -
                                             *
               constantly monitoring for  unusual matrix effects, gross sample processing
               error, etc.  The surrogate spike should not be used as an internal  standard
               for quantisation purposes.

                                           368<

-------
                                                 8
fe
^            7.  GC/MS Calibration Check
              For the base/neutral fraction, and add fraction decafluorotriphenyl-
              phosphlne (DFTPP) 1s run dally according to EPA procedures.  The require-
              ment 1s for 50 nanograms of DFTPP to meet relative ion abundance criteria**.
              For the volatile fraction pentaflurobromobenzene (PFBB) 1s run daily according
                         ..-..••                                      >"
              to EPA procedures.  The requirement is for 100 nanograms of PFBB to meet the
              relative ion abundance criteria?.  More recently, p-fluorobromobenzene has
              been recommended as a replacement for PFBB.9

              8.  GC Performance Check
              For the base/neutral fraction, benzidine is run daily either separately or
              as a part of a standard mixture.  The requirement is to be able to chroma-
              tograph the compound at the 100 nanogram level.  For the acid fraction,
 fr
 ^           pentachlorophenol is analyzed daily either separately or as part of a
              standard mixture.  The requirement is to be able to chromatograph the
              compound at the 100 nanogram level while giving an acceptable tailing
              factor7-10.  For the pesticide fraction, Aldrin is run daily either
              separately or as part of a standard mixture.  An injection of 100 picograms
              should give a recorder response of at least 501 full-scale deflection.

              Results and Discussion
              The results have been condensed and summarized in eight tables.  In order
              to maintain readability, information such as the number of data points
              contributed by each lab for each parameter and the corresponding concen-
 C

-------
tration range have not been Included.  Also specific results from each
laboratory for each parameter are hot included.  These data are,  however,
available from the authors upon request*

Interlaboratory Comparison
All the data in this report was collected before June 1979,  while the control-
ling protocol was published in April 1977.  There are four primary laboratories
(cf. with acknowledgment) contributing almost 10,000 data points  to this re-
view.  Some of the data was statistically rejected.   In Laboratory I, 3i of
the B/N and metal analytical data was rejected' using the statistical one-sided
test at the 2.5% significance level11.  Similary, 0.3S of the data from
Laboratory II was also excluded.  A total  of 18* of  the data from Laboratory
III was rejected for two reasons:  1) the spiking levels were not at least
two times above the background level (especially at  low levels) and 2)
application of the one-sided test suggested to a 97.55 confidence that the
data removed were likely outliers.

The data are expressed in terms of percent recovery  (P) plus or minus
(+) one standard deviation (Sp) where
             Sp
-f £")>,)
  ,  ^=1
                                                 '/.


-------
                                                10

             Table  I  summarizes the data for the various classes of priority pollutants.
             The inter!aboratory comparison gives the average recovery of only the
             compounds analyzed by all the contributing laboratories in the method  standard
             analysis.  Once this comparison set had been determined, then the same set
             of compounds was  used as the basis for interlaboratory comparison for  the  .
             matrix spike.  This precaution minimized data variability between the
             laboratories due  to properties associated with the individual  compounds like
             volatility, reactivity, etc. (vide infra).  Laboratory III had no method
             standard analytical data and had analyzed fewe.r compounds.  Note that  Sp
             in the interlaboratory comparison is the deviation of the recovery means
             and not measurement deviation.
             PURGEABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS.  As part of the process of quality assurance
f&           ^_—_——^—_———.^——
             Labs I,  II, III,  and IV analyzed field blanks consisting of organic-free
             water  that was transported to the analytical laboratory along with the
             samples.  Invariably, dichloromethane (methylene chloride), the extraction
             solvent, was observed in field blanks and laboratory blanks. Typical levels
             for laboratory IV were 2 _+ 1 parts per billion.  No data are reported   for
             2-chloroethyl vinyl ether and bis(chloromethyl) ether; the former appears
             not to have been  available and the latter is an alpha-chloromethyl ether
             which  is well known to undergo facile hydrolysis.  In a ten month stability
             study, Radian Corporation found that the initial concentration of both
C                                           371<

-------
                                                n
              these  ethers  in  their methanolic standard was reduced to zero probably from
              substitution  reactions with methane!12.  Also, the concentration of acrolein
              was reduced to zero.  Note that acrolein can undergo air oxidation, Michael
              addition,  and dimethyl acetal formation  1n methanol.

              Tables I and  II  summarize the results obtained for the purgeables.   The
              difference in recoveries between the method standard analysis and matrix
              spiked analysis  should be indicative of sample matrix effects and in
              this case  there  appears to be slight increase in recovery in going  from
              the method standard analysis (Interlab Comparison Average = 90_+ 13) to the
              matrix Spiked analysis (Interlab Comparison Average = 92 +_ 15).

              Volatility is a  very important variable in the analysis of the purgeable
              organic compounds  (VOA).  Labs I and III have omitted analysis of many
              of  the most volatile compounds, including bromomethane, chlormethane,
              dichlorodifluoromethane, and vinyl chloride.  Inspection of the individual
              laboratory data  show significant differences in going from the most
              volatile group of  compounds (bp < 75*C) to the least volatile compounds
              (bp >  112eC)  for Labs I and III only.  Recoveries increase and relative
              standard deviations decrease.  Using the two-tailed statistical  test for
              significance  of  the sample differences between the most volatile group
              and the intermediate and least volatile groups, assuming there is,no
              difference between the population means from which these samples are drawn
              it  is  established  to a greater than 99.9S confidence that the observed
-C                                          372<

-------
                                                 T2
              difference  for these groups arise from volatility.  Lab II cooled their
^             Tenax sorbent trap with liquid COg and Lab IV used a sorbent trap mix
              containing  Tenax, silica gel, and activated charcoal.   In a separate
              precision study  (method standard analysis) by Lab IV involving  five
              measurements at  each of four different concentration,  standard  deviations
              of 11.2+3.4 and  10.0+2.4 were obtained for the most volatile group  (11
              compounds or 220 data points) and the intermediate and least volatile   7
              groups  (17  compounds or 340 data points), respectively.  Thus,  to a 95X
              confidence  it appears that even in analytical laboratories where volatility
              is mainly under  control, the more volatile compounds exhibit greater
                                                           <
              measurement fluctuation.
              Comparison  of the recovery data of deuterated purgeable organic surrogates
              in Table VII versus the recoveries of the corresponding nondeuterated
 ^y           priority pollutant in Table II gives, respectively, 93_+22 and 93+_24 for
              benzene, 139+_96  and 110+21 for chloroform, 146+55 and  88+24 for dichloro-
              methane, 94+18 and 106+28 for ethylberizene, 92+18 from 97+25 for toluene,
              119+29  and  103+_27 for 1,2-dichloroethane, and 117+41 and 94+36  for  1,1,1-
              trichloroethane.  The large scatter for the data would suggest  that d-
              chloroform  and d2-dichloromethane are poor choices for surrogates.

              PHENOLIC ACIDS
              After the B/N compounds have been extracted from the alkaline sample
                                               373<

-------
                                                 13

              with methylene chloride (Figure 1), the aqueous phase is made acidic with
              6H HC1  and again extracted with methylene chloride.  This latter methylene
              chloride extract is dried by passing through a column of anhydrous sodium
              sulfate and the solvent concentrated by distillation in Kuderna-Danish
              apparatus.  Lab III investigated acid carryover in waste samples from the.-
              leather tanning industry which tended to form emulsions and therefore were
              extracted continously for 24 hours; they noted a pH change from greater than
              11 to 8-9.  In a separate study, Lab IV demonstrated that, in
              the absence of emulsians, significant carryover of only the weakest acids,
              2-4-dimethylphenol (50%) and 4-chloro-3-methylphenol (10%), occurred.
              Lab V minimized emulsion problems by dilution of the creosote waste from the
              wood preserving industry before commencing to analyze it.

              A strong relationship exits between acid volatility and analytical recovery.
              In all  laboratories contributing to this report, acid recovery was. lower
              for the more volatile phenols (bp < 211°C: 2-chlorphenol, phenol, 2,4-.
              dichlorophenol, and 2,4-dimethylphenol), than for the less volatile ones
              (bp >211°C: 2-nitrophenol, 4-chloro-3-methylphenol, 2,4,6-trichlorophenol,.,
              and pentachlorphenol).  In general, the relative standard deviation decreased
              in going from the most volatile to least volatile group; the p-nitrophenols
              were excluded from consideration in the volatility grouping because of their
              propensity to thermally undergo /intramolecular oxidation to p-quinones which
              may also explain why these phenols chromatograph poorly.  Application of  the
•c
374<

-------
                                             14





          two-tailed statistical  test  for  significance  of the  overall difference in



          recoveries for these two groups  of acids  results in  a  greater than 95% con-



          fidence that  the volatility  hypothesis  is valid.





          Comparison of the recoveries of  phenol  (Table III, 54+24)  and ds-phenol



          (Table VII, 55+_20)  suggests  that ds-phenol  is a good choice for a surrogate.





          BASE/NEUTRALS COMPOUNDS



          The  simultaneous analysis of the 46 B/N compounds probably represents the



          most difficult task in  the analysis of  the organic priority pollutants.  This
                                  - - -                  »


          report summarizes the analytical  results  of 43 B/N compounds.  No analytical



          results for bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane, 4-chlorophenyl  phenyl ether, or N-

                                          ^

          nitrosodimethyl amine are contained in this report.   Presumably, 4-chlorophenyl



          phenyl ether  and bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane are not  readily acquired.  Absence



          of data for N-nitrosodimethylamine probably results  because of its poor chromatc



          graphic properties  (GC  gives a low broad  peak).   Also  it is questionable



          whether bis (2-chloroethoxy)methane is  stable enough in the aqueous environ-



          ment, particularly  under basic conditions, to be analyzable per the specified



          methodology.   Dibutyl and bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalates  were invariably present



          in the method and field blanks analyzed by Labs  III  and IV.  Since the waste



          samples from  the leather tanning and timber industries  were particularly



          beset with emulsion problems, some carryover  of B/N  compounds into the



          acid fraction was observed.   The most significant carryover occurred in the
a

-------
                                   15
lagoon influent samples taken from  the timber industry, and these
samples invariably had a high background of the prioirty pollutant
being analyzed.  Analysis for the basic compounds in the acid fraction
would probably be futile since they form hydrochloride salts that would
most likely remain in the aqueous phase even if they were carried into the
acid fraction.  If the B/N compounds are separated into reactive and
nonreactive groups, then discernible recovery differences become evident
(Table VIII).  The reactive group comprises of the alkyl amines and
chlorides, the phthalate esters, and isophorene (an enone); the nonreactive
group consists of all the other B/N compounds.  It is well known that
alkyl amines and chlorides react with each other to produce alkylated
ammonium salts^4-  Futhermore, alkyl chlorides can undergo elimination
and substitution reactions, like reaction with hydroxide ion to form alkene
and alcohols (aryl chlorides are inert to mucleophilic substituion and are
placed in the nonreactive group); perchlorocarbons can also form aldehydes,
ketones, and carboxylic acids by reaction with hydroxide ion.  Esters are
saponified by base arid isophorone can undergo condensation and Michael
addition reaction14.   Thus, greater analytical variability is to be expected
in the B/N reactive group.  The data in Table VIII appears to verify this
anticipation since, in general, recovery decreases and relative standard
deviation increases in going from the nonreactive group to the reactive
group.  Lab II and Lab IV have noted instability indications associated
                              376^

-------
                                    16

with the standards for the B/N analysis.  Radian Corporation  did a ten
month storage stability study of their B/N standard in methylene chloride
and found significant changes in the concentrations of the  chloroalkyl
ethers, N-nitrosoam1nes, hexachlorocyclopentadiene. dibenzo(a,h)anthracene,
and benzidine*2.  Because of emulsion problems, Lab III used  continuous
extractors in the analytical processing of the samples from the leather
tanning and timber industries.  As noted earlier the pH was initially
adjusted to above 11, but after 24 hours of extraction the  pH dropped to
8-9.  Lab III performed analyses on sample matrices from a  more complex and
diverse industrial cross section and have the lowest Interlab Comparison
recovery value  (55^24) in Table I, .in spite of statistical  refinement of
the data.  Other problems in the GC/MS screening of the B/N compounds include
coelution of anthracene with phenanthrene, benzo(a)anthracene with chrysene,
and benzo(b)fluoranthrene with benzo(k)fluoranthrene coupled  with the inability
to distinguish  between these pairs by"mass spectrometry. Thermal decomposition
of 1,2-diphenylhydrazine to azobenzene and N-nitrosodiphenylamine to diphenyl
amine and tetraphenylhydrazine has been documented15.

Comparison of the respective recoveries for dg-naphthalene  (76+22) and d£-
nitrobenzene (70+71) 1n Table VII versus naphthalene (89+51)  and nitrobenzene
(77+51) in Table IV is favorable.
                                    377

-------
                                    17
PESTICIDES
The GC/EC analysis of the pesticides is the most straight-forward of
the organic priority pollutants^.  Since found Chlordane, PCB, and
Toxaphene are indistinguishable due to interferences  between the'many
compounds in the spike, that the pesticides are spiked  in groups of
compounds known to be separable.  Endrin aldehyde has a high standard
deviation in Table V probably because of partial  air  oxidation to a
carboxylic acid.
HETALS
For the most part, none of the laboratories had difficulty  in the metals
analysis above concentration of approximately 25 ppb.   The  high standard
deviations present in the data of Lab I is no doubt due to  the low spiking
level which is close to the detection limit of the method used by the
laboratory. ' In the flameless analysis of zinc, environmental contamination
problems were apparently experienced by Labs I and II.   It  is also possible
that in the method standard analysis of chromium, copper, and nickel, Lab
I was having contamination problems from copper and stainless steel plumbing.
                        i
CYANIDE AND TOTAL PHENOLS
Total phenols were colorimetrically determined by Labs  II and IV via a
totally automated procedure^.  Recovery data for the  cyanide and total
phenols are presented in Table VI.
                                37?

-------
                                    18
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
A summary of the overall recoveries of the priority pollutants is given
 in Table I.  In every case, except for the purgeable organic compounds,
the overall recovery decreases and the relative standard deviation
increases in going from the method standard to the matrix spiked analysis.
Of the organic priority  pollutants, the analysis of the purgeable and acid
organic, compounds results  in the highest recoveries with the smallest
                      of tK<. ^vxfneo\Ae Pfr*jaWt C^povi/rv^s t*4 tt\c dtifmse "•>
matrix effect.  The  increase in recovery for the phenolic acids in going
from unadulterated water to a matrix aqueous medium may be a salting-out
and salting-in effect, respectively, and needs to be studied.  The two
major variables for these  groups is volatility and carryover of phenolic
acids into the B/N fraction, the latter arising mainly from emulsion problems
since the data from Lab  III suggest that no pka dependence was associated
                                        ^»,
with their observed acid carryover.  The process of continuous extraction
itself may be responsible  for carry over which needs to be experimentally
determined.  Volatility can be controlled by close monitoring of the
analytical process.  Ascertaining that the pH is greater than 11 and, in
the case of emulsion, performing an additional base wash of the B/N
methylene chloride extract will rectify carryover of the acids into the
B/N fraction.  The question concerning the stability of methylene chloride
                                  «
during long term (24 hour) contact with hydroxide solution under emulsion
conditions needs to be investigated.

-------
                                                19
            In part, the analysis of the base/neutral  and pesticide compounds give-the
            lowest recoveries because of their greater propensity to  react among each
            other or with hydroxide or water^*.   Several  laboratories  have noted that
            when the four different B/N methanolic standards  are mixed in methylene
            chloride that this solution becomes  turbid and eventually changes to a
            yellow color.  Thus, the stability of the  priority  pollutants, benzidine   / '
            and 1,2-diphenylhydrazine in contact with  methylene chloride needs to be
            fully determined.  Saponification of the phthalate  esters  has been observed
            during the B/N analysis by several laboratories.  Another major variable
            in the analysis of the B/N compounds is carryove'r into the acid fraction
            in the presence of emulsions; this appears to be  particularly acute at high
            background concentrations of the  B/N component.
            The VOA analysis per the EPA protocol  has  proved  to be the most successful.
            The acid and pesticide analyses have been  moderately successful, and the B/N
            analysis has been less successful  on samples  with severe matrix problems, as
            from the leather tanning and timber  industries.   Nevertheless, the present
            methodology is adequate and appears  capable of improvement.  We can be con-
            fident that false positive analyses  are considerably less  likely than false
            negative analyses so that when a  priority  pollutant is detected in the environ-
            ment we know the measured quantity is probably smaller than the true value.
            Table IX summarizes problems associated with  the  current  priority pollutant
            methodology.
C
380-=

-------
                                    20
Initial recommended performance control  limits can be  computed  by
adding (upper control limits, UCL) or subtracting (lower control limit
LCL) three times the standard deviation from the average percent
recovery values presented 1n Tables I to VI1116.  Some of LCL's will  no
doubt increase as the analytical methodology improves.   Also, one  should
note that these control limits are somewhat dependent  upon the  level  of
standard addition, the degree of which has not been fully investigated.

-------
Acknowledgement

The major portion of the data in this summary came from EPA-Region VII
and EPA Quality Assurance Contract Reports from A.D. Little. Inc.  Acorn
Park, Cambridge, HA 02140 (EPA contract #68-01-3857) Carborundum Co.  3401
LaGrande Blvd.  Sacramento CA 95823 (EPA contract #68-01-4689)  and Versar,
INC., 6621 Electronics Dr.-, Springfield, VA 22151 (EPA contract #  68-01-3852).

-------
            Literature Cited

            1.  Environmental Science and Technology, February 1978, p.  154

            2.  "Sampling and Analysis Procedures for Screening of Industrial
                Effluents for Priority Pollutants," US EPA, Environmental  Monitoring
                and Support Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH 45268, March 1976 (Revised  April  1977)

            3.  Federal Register, 38(125), 17318(1973)

            4.  "Midwest Research Institute Final Letter Report on Evaluation  of Test
                Procedure for Acrolein and Acrylonitrile, "MRI Project NO. 4719-A,
                US EPA Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory,  Cincinnati,
                OH 45268, June, 1979.

            5.  "Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes," US  EPA,  Enviro-
                mental Monitoring and Support Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH 45268,  March,
                1979.

            6.  "Procedure for Preliminary Evaluation of Analytical Methods to be
                Used in the Verification Phase of the Effluent Guidelines Division BAT
                Review," US EPA, Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory,
                Cincinnati, OH  45268, March 1978.

            7.  "Addendum for Sampling and Analysis Procedures for Screening  of
                Industrial Effluents for Priority Pollutants," US EPA, Environmental
(~~*             Monitoring and Support Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH 45268, April,  1979.

            8.  J.W. Eichelberger, L.E. Harris, and W.L. Budde, Anal. Chem. ,47,  995
            9.  Federal Register, Volume 44, NO. 233, December 3, 1979.  "Guidelines
                Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis of Pollutants, Proposed
                Regulations".

           10.  H.M. McNair and E.J. BonelH, "Basic Gas Chromatography." Consolidated
                Printing, Berkeley, CA, 1969, p. 52.

           11.  American Society of Testing and Materials., D2777.

           12.  Private communications with Dr. L.H. Keith, Radian Corporation., Austin,
                Texas.

           13.  M.R. Spiegel, "Statistics," (Schaum's Outline Series), McGraw-Hill  Book
                Co., San Francison, CA, 1961, -p. 170.
 C

-------
14.  R. Morrison and R.  Boyd,  "Organic Chemistry," 2nd Edition, Allyn  and
     Bacon Inc., Boston, HA, 1969

15.  "Seminar on Analytical Methods For Priority Pollutants,"  Proceedings,
     US EPA, Denver, Colorado, November, 1977.

16.  "Handbook for Analytical  Control in Water and Wastewater  Laboratories,"
     US EPA, Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory,  Cincinnati, OH
     45268, March, 1979.
                              384<

-------
                   TABLE I.   IKTERLABORATORY COMPARISON8
Priority
Pollutant
Fraction"
Volatile
(MS)
Volatile
Sample Spike
Acid (MS)
Acid Sample
Blank
B/N-(MS)
B/N Sample
Spike
Pesticide
(MS)
Pesticide
Sample Spike
Metals (MS)
Metals
Sample Spike
Cyanide (MS)
Cyanide
Sample Spike
Phenol ics
(MS)
Phenolics
Sample Spike
LAB
I
88+21
82+24
90+18
92+34 ~
95+25
84+18
73+8
69+_7
113+_37
100+20
103+J4
10U12
10+13
93+.15
LAB LAB
II III
95+_5
101+9 93+J3
89+_5
72+10 62+J2
78+41
61+22 55+_24
74+J9 ' -
51+18 33+10
-
103+J4
-
-
97+6
t
98+J 0
LAB LAB LAB
IV V VII
100+8 -
107+_9 -
67+_14 82+.16 -
60+15 84+.17 -
77+_15 -
68_+16 - 63+_13
88+8
93+5
103+.8 -
92j+7
lOSjfS -
93+J6 -
100+_7 -
97+9
Averagec
90+_13
92+_15
84_+13
76+J9
84+_25
68+_21
78+_ll
59+_ll
108^22
96+_ll
103+_7
96^14
101 +_8
96+11
a)  The values are in units of percent recovery (P) plus or minus  (+)  one
standard deviations (Sp).
b)  MS refers to the method standard or the standard addition to  blank  water.
Sample spike refers to the standard addition to a sample.
c)  P and Sp are weighted averages based on the number of data points
contributed by each laboratory.

-------
                                       TABLE II.   Purgeable Orgam'csa
               Compound
               Acrolein
               Acrylonitrile
               Benzene
               Bromodichloromethane
               Brcmoform
               Bromomethane
               Carbon Tetrachloride
               Chlorobenzene
               Chiorodibromomethane
               Chloroethane
               Chloroform
               Chloromethane
               Dichlorodifluoromethane
               1,1-Dichloroethane
               1,2-Dichloroethane
               1,1-Dichloroethylene
               trans-7,2-Dichloroethylene
               Dichloromethane
               1,2-Dichloropropane
               cls-1,3-Dichloropropene
               trans -1-3-D1chloropropene
               Ethyl benzene
Hethodb
Standard
77+30
96+^31
89+12
97+11
94 +.14
90^16
91+23
94+^23
86+12
67+22
90^18
91+^22
108+11*
83j+10
102.+12
74+,24
90+^25
82^46
94+_26
95^15
91+13
109+19
Standard0
Spike
32+30
102^28
93+24
103+31
88+12
78+15
9H33
103+24
99+17
6CH23
91+26
64^28
- 114+8*
87+21
103^27
80+32
85+35
66^66
99^30
98+20
93^16
106+28
c
                                              386<

-------
                                     Continuation of Table.II
                                                   Method                    Sample
            Compound                               Standard                  Spike
            1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane               81+31                     78+31
            Tetrachloroethylene                     97+13                     99+25
            To!uene                                 9S+22                     97+_25
            1,1,1-Trichloroethane                   92+21                     94^36
            1,1,2-Trichloroethane                  102^14                     103^19
            Trichloroethylene                      10fr+14                     110+22
            Trichlorofluoromethane                  59+^23                     67^48
            Vinyl  Chloride                         103+30                     79+22
            a) The values are in terms of P ± Sp.  Data from 2-4 laboratories  have been
            averaged except where noted with an (*) asterisk.  In general  the  concentration
            added ranged from 10 to 1000 parts per billion.
            b) Standard addition to blank water.
            c) Standard addition to sample.   :
            *Data from only one lab were available.._.
C
387-:

-------
            COMPOUND
            2-Chlorophenol
            4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
            2,4-Dichlorophenol
            2,4-Dimethylphenol
            4 ,s--Di ni tro-£-cresol
            2,4-D1n1trophenol
            2-Nitrophenol
            4-Nitrophenol
            Pentachlorophenol
            Phenol
            2,4,6-Trichlorophneol
TABLE III.  ACID FRACTION3
       HETHODb
       STANDARD
       96^16
       86+24
       71+19
       87+_34
       89+22
       95+_22
       65+_33
        87+24
       61+11
        91+22
SAMPLEC
 SPIKE
  71+23
  99^19
  84+_23
  72+_16
 102^23
  92+40
  87+_22
  59+46
   84^22
  54+_24
   80+24
            a)  The values are In terms of P _+ Sp.  Data from 2-5 laboratories have  '
            been averaged.  In general the concentration added ranged from 20 to 2500
            parts per billion.
            b)  Standard addition to blank water.
            c)  Standard addition to sample.
-r
                                               388^

-------
                                      TABLE IV  BASE/NEUTRAL FRACTION*
C
Compound
Acenaphthene
Acenapthylene
Anthracene*^
Benzldine
Benzo(a)anthracenee
Benzo(b)fluoranthene^ -
Benzo(k)fluoranthene'f
8enzo(a)pyrene
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
Bis(2-chloroethyl) Ether
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) Ether
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
4-Bromophenyl Phenyl  Ether
2-Chloronaphthalene
Chrysenee
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Di-n-butyl  Phthalate
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
Method^
Standard
90+_22
83+22
98+20
44+27
105+33
96+68*
^™ t
96+68
90+22
49+39
98+48
154+;! 36
70+33
80+25
88+20
105+J33
80+42
80+_32
6&+24
67+_21
67+_22
71+85
Sample0
Spike
78+_24
79+27
79+26
40+29
51+_24
41+_21
47+_27
43+21
49+_22
80+_49
96^88
66+50
63+25
79+_21
77+_27
36+_29
58+_27
65+27
62+20
63+_21
62+45
C
                                            389<

-------
c
Method^
Standard
71+37
43+37
122+55
115+41
84+44
97+.2S
111+26
98+24
98+31
76^26
38+28
63+22
66+36
109.+14
83+24
106.+31
72^22
86+.S4
98+20
142^41
74+22
Sample0
Spike
65+37
66+43
94+45
104+35
88+32
91+32
63+20
88+25
76+31
77+45
27+JO
58+23
67+_22
40^21
89+51
77+51
66+25
7H22
79+20
63+_20
-69+24
C
Compound
Diethyl Phthalate
Dimethyl Phthalate
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Di-n-octyl Phthalate
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine '
(and/or Azobenzene)
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Hexachloroethane
Isophorone
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
N-ni trosodi pheylamine
(and/or Diphenylamine)

N-Nitrosodi-^-propylamine
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene                 _                            _
                                 i
a)  The values are In terms of P _+ Sp.   Data from 2-5 laboratories  have been
averaged except where noted with an (*)  asterisk.  In general  the concentration
added ranged from 10 to 500 parts per billion.
b)  Standard addition to blank water.
c)  Standard addition to sample.
d.e.f) These isomers pairs are not separted by  packed column  GC.  Also mass
spectral data are not sufficiently unique to allow differentiation.
*0ata from only one lab were available.
                                             39CK

-------
e
                                 TABLE V.  PESTICIDE FRACTION*
Methodb
Standard
72+13
78413
79+21
78+14
82_+16
8H17*
82^14
76^14
85+17
7H14
65+14
67±19
74^39*
82+_25
64+76*
72^12
82j+14
83f!l*
89+12*
Sample0
Spike
v 55+12
55^12
57+22
64+11
_61±16
39_+9*
62+16
57^1 8
76+26
62+16
61+J3
66jfl4
844.30*
68^18
34^39*
49^12
65+11
42^13

            Compound
            AldHn
            alpha-BHC
            beta-BHC
            gamma-BHC
            delta-BHC
            Chlordane
            4,4'-ODD
            4,4'-DDE
            4,4'-DDT
            Dieldrin
            Endosulfan I
            Endosulfan II
            Endosulfane Sulfate
            Endrln
            Endn'n Aldehyde
            Heptachlor
            Heptachlor Epoxide
            PCB
           Toxaphene
           a)  The values are in terms  of P *_ Sp.  Data from 2-4 laboratories  have  been
           averaged except where noted  with an  (*)asterisk.  In general  the concentration
           added ranged from 0.1 to 100 parts per billion.
           b)  Standard addition to blank water.
           c)  Standard addition to sample.
           •data from only one lab  were available.
r
                                            391<

-------
                            TABLE VI.  METALS,  CYANDIE, AND PHENOLICS3
 c
PARAMETER
Antimony
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Mercury^
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thai 1 ium
Zinc
Cyanide
Total Phenols
METHOD13
STANDARD
61+47*
120+20
89+16
9H18
99+30
136j+70
116+32
83+24
84^62
112+15
110+25-'
99+33*
122+44
103+7
101+8
SAMPLE2
SPIKE
103+24
SL ^*
97+_25
94+20
98+23
106+_25
99+24
93+_25
79+_38
101+_26
93+_20
80_+25
95+_23
106+_37
96_+14
96+11
            a)  The values are in terms of P _+ Sp.  Data from 2-3 laboratories have been
            averaged exept where noted with an (*)  asterisk.  In genral the concentration
            added ranged from 10 to 1000 parts per  billion.
            b)  Standard addition to blank water.
            c)  Standard addition to sample.
            d)  Analyzed by the cold vapor technique.

            *Data from only one lab were available.
-r
                                           332<

-------
                 TABLE VII.  PRIORITY POLLUTANT SURROGATES*
 Compound
 (Purgeable Orgnalcs)
 ds-Benzene
 Bromochl oromethane
 d-Chl orof onn
 1 ,4-Dichlorobutane
 d4-l ,2-Dichloroethane
 d~Dichl oromethane
            nzene
 Fluorobenzene
 dg-Tol uene
i ^3-1 ,1 ,1-Trichloroethane
 1-chl oro-2-bromopropane
 (Acids)
 2-Fluorophenol
 Pentafl uorophenol
LAB
LAB
LAB
139+_96

119+29
146+55
102+_25
96+20

117+41
 Tri f 1 uoro-m-cresol
 (Base/Neutral)
 Decaf 1 uorobi phenyl
 ds-Napthalene
 2-f 1 uoronaphthal ene
 1-fluoronaphthalene
 2-fl uorobi phenyl
 76+.36
 84^30
 55+_20
72+42

 39+,! 8
 76+_22'
 75+^20
 69+18
 68+J6
 63+5
 95^10
 98+11

 96+10
 97+12
 95+10
                      93+11
 50+22
  41+29
 101+39
   46+13

-------
Table VII (cont'd)
ds-aniline                  57+36

Compound            LAB I lib  '            LAB IVC               LAB VII id


2-fluoroaniline      74+39

ds-nitrobenzene      70+21


a)  The values are in terms of P _+ Sp.  The concentration added ranged  from
20 to 200 parts per billion.                                              '
b)  The matrix for these surrogates included influent and effluent samples
from 12 different industrial categories.
c)  The matrix for these surrogates included POTW, detergent, and  chemical
disposal industries.
d)  The matrix for these surrogates included POTW samples only.
                                   331+

-------
               TABLE VIII.  REACTIVITY  GROUPS  OF  THE B/N PRIORITY POLLUTANTS
                         Method Standard  Analysis
Matrix Spiked  Analysis
Nonreactive Group Reactive Group Nonreactive Group Reactive Group
Laboratory
I
II
III
IV
VII
P+Sp
102+26 .
93+31
-
82f!0
_
P+Sp
.86+21
52+46
'
67^18
.
P+Sp
87+.18
60>21
.58+26
71 +.12
65+11
/
P+Sp
78+17
64+25
48+12
63+J8
57+17
Nonreactive B/N Compounds:  Acenaphthene, Acenaphthylene,  Anthracene, Benzo(a)anthra-
cene, Benzo(g,h,i)perylene, benzo(a)pyrene, 2-Chloronaphthalene,  1,2-,1,3-, and 1,4-Di
chlorobenzene, 2,6-Dinitrotoluene, Fluoranthene, Fluorene, Hexachlorobenzene, Naptha-
lene, Nitrobenzene, Pyrene, and 1,2,4-TrichlorobenzeTie.

Reactive B/N Compounds: Benzidine, Bis(2-chloroethyl) Ether,  Bis(2-ethylhexyl),
Diethyl, and Dimethyl Phthalates, 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine, Hexachlorobutadiene,
Hexachloroethane, and Isophorone.
                                         31*

-------
      TABLE IX  PROBLEM PRIORITY POLLUTANTS
COMPOUND
Dlchloromethane

bis-chloromethylether
N-nitrosodimethylamine
Di-n-butylphthalate
Bi s-(2-ethylhexyl)phthal ate
1,2-diphenylhydrazine
Benzidine
Hexachlorocyclopentadi ene

Endrin Aldehyde
Anthracene and Phenanthrene
Chrysene and benzo(a)-
Anthracene
benzo(b)fluoranthrene and
benzo(k)fluoranthrene
        PROBLEM
Frequently found in"blanks and
samples because of In lab con-
tamination.
Readily hydrolyzed in water., '
Poor chromatographic properties.
Frequently found in blanks.
Frequently found in blanks.
Thermally decomposes to diphenyl
amine and tetraphenylhydrazine.
Poor chromatographic properties.
Subject to thermal  and hydrolytic
decomposition.
Is readily oxidized.
Coelute on packed columns.
Coelute on packed columns.

Coelute on packed columns.

-------
             UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                               WASHINGTON. D.C.  20460
                                                                    OFFICE OF
                                                             RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
 SUBJECT:  Toxics Data  System—Evaluation of Region VJZ Data Set

 FROM:     Chris Timm, Director               /'pLs^'
            Quality Assurance  Management Staff£,
            Office of Monitoring and Technical Support  (RD-680)

 TO:        Edmund  Notzon,  Director
            Monitoring and Data Support Division
            Office of Water  and Waste Management (WH-553)
In response to the request by Fred Leutner at the May Agency Quality Assurance Advisory
Committee meeting, the. QAMS agreed to review your evaluation of  the four  data  sets.
prepared  for the initiation of the Toxics  Substances  Data Systems.  Subsequently, I  met
with  Paul Durand  of your staff  to  review the files on your  original  assessment.  As  I
understand it, the initial  assessment  was developed solely by phone coversations between
your staff and the project officers or principal investigators with no further documentation
of the compliance  with data evaluation criteria.

Consequently, I  requested  Bob Booth, Deputy Director, Environmental Monitoring Systems
Laboratory-Cincinnati, to  evaluate the Region vn data set in order to verify their reported
status for each of the criteria being  considered.  Bob completed his evaluation during  the
week of June 23-26, 1980, and  a  copy of  his report is attached.

Based  upon this report,  we  believe  that the Region  YE data  set  is of adequate quality
and documentation  for input  into the Toxics Substances Data System.  We do  recommend,
though, that  some type of assessment of the data quality,  such as the  Quality Assurance
Criteria  recommended earlier  or  preferably,  a numerical assessment  of precision   and
accuracy  be  input along with the data in order to assure future credibility.

V.'e are proceeding with a review of the other three data  sets, based upon the information
provided by your staff, and should have our evaluation reports to you before September
30, 1980.

Attachment

cc:   Courtney Riorcsn (RD-680)
     Richard Dov.-d  (A-101)
     Robert Booth  (E.MSL-CI)
     Thomas  Stanley (RD-680)
     sjrnov Verner  '(RD-680)
          "
                                      39'

-------
X*0*"*,
           UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                     OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
               ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND SUPPORT LABORATORY
                              CINCINNATI. OHIO 45263
   DATE:     July 24, 1980

   SUBJECT:  Toxics Data System; Evaluation of Region 7 Data

   FROM:     Robert L. Booth, Deputy Director  /
             Environmental Monitoring and Support
             Laboratory - Cincinnati

   TO:       Christopher M.'Tiwm,.. Director
             Quality Assurance Management Staff
             Office of Monitoring and Technical Support

   Per our discussions on- this Subject, I reviewed the Region 7 data sets
   that are being considered as part of the pilot storage study for TOXET.
   The following comments are made around the headings of the "check list
   reference" table given in Ned Notion's draft of April  23, 1980.   This
   evaluation was made as part of our on-site evaluation of Region  7's
   laboratory during the week of June 23-26, 1980.

        1.   STATION IDENTIFICATION

             The data to be considered for the'pilot study will be  that
             generated from the POTW studies being done for O'FarreVs  -
             group in headquarters.  The stations were apparently picked
             by O'Farrel.  Burns and Row, the prime contractor, is  responsible
             for the sampling.  In my discussion with Charles Hensley and
             Billy Fairless, it was recognized that there is probably not
             an adequate station identification/description for STORET/TOXET
             purposes at this time.  Providing resources were made  available
             to the region, this information can be provided.

        2.   IN STORET FORMAT

             The identification number is assigned by the prime contractor and
             the sample is shipped to the regional laboratory.  Once the
             analysis has been completed and the results reviewed by Charles
             Hensley the data are forwarded to O'FarreTl.  Regional staff do
             not believe the data are currently in EPA STORET format.  Again,
             the region does have the necsessary expertise to provide this
             required input but additional resources would need to be.provided,
                                       398<

-------
3.   QUALITY ASSURANCE  (QA)  PLAN APPROVED

     No  formal  plan was  prepared for the study. In reviewing their
     QA  program I  learned  that the following protocol is being used.
                                 »
           a.   In a set of  12-16 samples representing a single POTW site,
               the  region is  provided with a field blank and at least
               one  duplicate  sample by the contractor.

           b.   A spiked sample is prepared in the laboratory.

           c.   Once a  set of  approximately 15 duplicate and spiked
               data points  is available, i.e., from 15 different POTW
               sources, a statistical summary is prepared.

           d.   Two  standard deviations is used as a warning
               limit and  three standard deviations as a control
               limit.  These  limits are generated by the lab
               staff on the above mentioned samples.  Their precision and
               accuracy data  are significantly better than the data
               being provided by the other three contractors in the
               POTW studies.  In factf as a side issue, in my review
               of the  data, I would strongly recommend that at least
               2 of the 3 contractors be fired and that their data
               be purged  from the system.

               The  regional QA plan is now available in draft form.  As
              you  know,  however, it does not provide the kind of detail
               that is needed for a laboratory QA plan.  This will probably
               be forthcoming when the laboratory staff is required to
               prepare standard operating procedures and QA project plans
               as a part  of the Agency's Mandatory QA Program.

4.   QA AUDITS

     The laboratory has  actively participated in our performance
     evaluation studies, and they routinely make use of our Quality
     Control check samples.  A review of their data shows that they
     are within the Agency's acceptance limits 98% of the time for all
     contaminants  at  varied concentration levels.   Clearly, they rank
     as one of the Agency's best laboratories in this category.

5.   QUALITY CONTROL  (QC)

     It was apparent  from  our on-site lab evaluation and from the candid
     conversations that  I  had with management, that region 7 has an
     excellent on-going QC program.   As is the case with a number of
     programs, there  is a  need to document in some areas what is being

-------
           done.  Overall, the field collection,  laboratory  analysis, and
           data management systems are  being"quality-controlled  in an
           exemplary manner.

      6.    PRECISION AND ACCURACY

           As indicated, precision and  accuraricy  data  are available on real
           world samples.   More importantly,  they have a strong  data base from
           previous studies to compare  their  current performance samples.
           Their methods of calibration are well  documented  and  they are
           readily available.   In this  regard,  it should be  noted that Dr.
           Jerry Dias, a consultant to  their  program,  has done an outstanding
           job in presenting  their QA data in an  easy  to follow  manner.
           Perhaps even more  noteworthy, he has had an opportunity to
           review the data and make some interesting observations concerning
           the fate of these  organic contaminants in the environment.

      7-    METHODS

           Approved methods are being used in the POTW studies.  The organic
           analysis is being  done by use of GC/MS techniques and the toxic
           metals are being done by ICP .  Both methods are  published in the
           Federal  Register and will  be part  of final  rulemaking for section
           304(h) methodology  in the near future.

      8.    DATA REVIEW

            ie following system is used for review of  data:

                a.   Data are provided to a key puncher with  an absolute mini-
                    mum number of transfers by staff.

                b.   Key puncher provides data cards which are verified by a
                    second party.

                c.   Roy Crossland, Data Coordinator for the  region, does a
                    spot review of the  data printout and makes certain
                    checks to  verify validation of data.

                d.   Charles Hensley,  Acting Chief, also reviews  the printout
                    in  a  similar manner before approving its forwarding to
                    headquarters.   Although a detailed line-by-line
                    review of  the  data  is not being made, any major errors are
                    probably, being caught by  this  review process.

As we have discussed,  a  very  important element that is not  covered in the table
heading is that  of sample conditions.   This  would include the type of
containers used, the  preservative used,  and  the  holding times that are required.
In reviewing  these  elements with  the laboratory  staff, it would appear that


                                       4OCK

-------
there is a holding time problem for the organics.  This is limited to the
holding time that the sample extraction may be held after the liquid liquid
extraction has been made on the aqueous sample.  In some cases,  due to
instrumental failure or an unusually large number of samples coming in at
one time, sample extractions are being held for longer than the  currently
recognized holding times.  They are already running two shifts to alleviate
this problem and have taken other actions to limit the instances in which
sample extracts are held too long.

All of the above information was provided to Paul Durand in a meeting held in
Alexandria, Virginia, on July  17.  At his request, I provided him this detailed
information so that he would be properly perpared for a briefing he was to
have with Ned Notzon on July 25.  As I noted to him, I believe that, overall,
the POTW data being generated  by Region 7 can be used in this pilot study.
It is obvious, however, that certain elements need to be strengthened
before we can consciously say  "yes" on the check list table.'

cc:  Charles Hensley, Chief, Laboratory Branch, Surveillance and Analysis
        Division, U.S. EPA, Region 7
     Billy Fairless, Deputy Director, Surveillance and Analysis  Division,
        U.S. EPA, Region 7

-------