United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards
Research Triangle Park NC 27711
EPA-450/4-82-003
May 1983
Air
Emission Factor
Documentation
ForAP-42:
Section 1.10,
Residential
Wood Stoves

-------
                                           EPA-450/4-82-003
Emission Factor Documentation For AP-42
   Section  1.10, Residential Wood  Stoves
                             by

                    Pacific Environmental Services, Inc.
                       Contract No. 68-02-3511
                  EPA Project Officer: William H. Lamason, II
                          Prepared for

                   U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                     Office of Air, Noise and Radiation
                  Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
                 Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711

                           May 1983

-------
                            Disclaimer

     This report has been reviewed by the Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and
approved for publication as received from Pacific Environmental
Services, Inc., Durham, NC.   Approval does not signify that the
contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, nor does mention of  trade names or
commercial products constitute endorsement or  recommendation for
use.  Copies of this report are available from the Air Management
Technology Branch, Monitoring and Data Analysis Division, Office of
Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC  27711.
                                  ii

-------
                         Table of Contents

Section                                                      Page

1.0  Introduction 	   1

     1.1  Identification of Pollutants	   2

     1.2  Variables Affecting Emissions
          Characterizations   	   4

2.0  Procedure for Revision of Emission  Factors  	   7

     2.1  Nitrogen Oxide Emissions   	   7

     2.2  Sulfur Oxide Emissions   	   9

     2.3  Carbon Monoxide Emissions  	   9

     2.4  Particulate Emissions    	   12

     2.5  Volatile Organic Compound  (VOC) Emissions  ....   14

          2.5.1  Polycyclic Organic  Materials  (POMs).  ...   16

3.0  Emission Factor Ratings  	   19

4.0  References	21

APPENDIX A - Emission Measurement  Programs   	   24

APPENDIX B - Test Results Extracted  From References
             and Used in Emission  Factor
             Determinations 	   37
                                 ill

-------
Number
                    List of Tables and Figures
                                                  Page
Figure 1


Histogram  2-1

Histogram  2-2

Figure 2


Histogram  2-3

Histogram  2-4


Table 1


Table 2
Example Generic Designs of Wood
Stoves Based on Flow Paths .  .  ,

Nitrogen Oxide Emissions  ...
Carbon Monoxide Emissions. . .
Carbon Monoxide Concentration in
Flue Gas as a Function of Time  .
Particulate Emissions,
Volatile  Organic  Compound  (VOC)
Emissions	
Low Molecular Weight  Hydrocarbon
Emissions	
 Polycyclic Organic  Material  (POM)
 Emissions	
 3

 8
10

11

13


15


17


17
                                  iv

-------
                          1.0   INTRODUCTION

     Emissions  from  residential wood  combustion  and associated air
quality  impacts have  only recently  been  the  subject of intensive
investigation.  A wide range  of emission  rates has  been reported;
many results  are not  comparable because  operating conditions were
not equivalent.  The  purpose  of this  effort  is to assemble and
organize emissions data  from  past and ongoing  research, screen this
data for quality and  recentness, and  incorporate it into the AP-A2
emission factor file.  Improved emission  factors will  provide a
more realistic  assessment of  the impact  of residential wood combustion
on  local air  quality.

     Coal  and waste  fuels were not  included  in computing emission
factors because of the relative scarcity  of  test data  available.
More research is being done in this area  and possibly  the next
effort at  revision will  be supported  by  a data base enabling the
generation of representative  emission factors  for coal and waste
fuel burning  stoves.  Coal and wood waste logs burn at significantly
higher temperatures  than cordwood.  The  performance of various
heaters within  a given type will vary, depending on how a particular
design uses its potential performance advantages.   Much of the
available  emissions  data came from  studies conducted on stoves
designed for  woodburning.

     Wood  stoves are  used primarily as domestic  space  heaters to
supplement conventional  heating systems,  particularly  in the
Northeastern  and Northwestern United  States.   The two  basic designs
for wood stoves are  radiating and circulating. 1   Common construction
materials  include cast iron,  heavy-gauge  sheet metal and stainless
steel.  Radiating type stoves transfer heat  to the  room by radiation
from the hot  stove walls. Circulating type  stoves  have double wall
construction  with louvers on  the exterior wall to  permit the conversion
of  radiant energy to  warm convection  air. Properly designed, these
stoves range  in heating  efficiency  from  50 to  70 percent. 1  Radiant
stoves have proven to be somewhat more efficient than  the circulating
type.

     The thoroughness of combustion and  the  amount  of  heat
transferred from a stove,  regardless  of whether  it  is  a radiating
or  circulatory model, depend  heavily  on  firebox  temperature, residence
time and turbulence  (mixing).  The  "three Ts"  (temperature,  time
and turbulence) are  affected  by air flow  patterns  through the stove
and by the mode of stove operation.   Many stove  designs have internal
baffles that  increase the residence time  of  flue gases, thus promoting
heat transfer.  The use  of baffles  and secondary combustion air may
also help  to  reduce  emissions by promoting mixing and  more thorough
combustion.  Unless  the  secondary air is  adequately preheated, it
may serve  to quench  the  flue  gas, thus retarding,  rather than

-------
enhancing, secondary combustion.   Secondary  combustion air systems
should be designed to deliver  the  proper amount  of  secondary air  at
the right location with  adequate  turbulence  and  sufficient temperature
to promote true secondary  combustion.

     Stoves are further  categorized by the air flow pattern  through
the burning wood within  the  stoves.  Example generic designs -
updraft, downdraft, crossdraft and "S-flow"  - are shown schematically
in Figure 1.2

     In  the updraft air  flow type  of stove,  air enters at the  base
of the stove and passes  through the wood to  the stove pipe at  the
top.  Secondary air enters above  the wood to assist in igniting
unbumed volatiles in  the  combustion gases.   Updraft stoves provide
very little gas-phase  residence time,  which  is needed for efficient
transfer of heat from  the  gases to the walls of the stove and/or
stovepipe.

     The downdraft air  flow  type  of stove initially behaves like an
updraft.  A vertical damper  is opened at the top rear to promote
rapid  combustion.  When a  hot  bed  of coals is developed, the  damper
is  closed, and  the flue gases  are  then forced back down through  the
bed  of  coals  before going  out  the  flue exit.

     The side  or cross  draft is equipped with a vertical baffle
 (open  at the  bottom) and an  adjustable damper at the top, similar
to  the  downdraft.  The  damper  is  open when combustion is initiated,
to  generate  hot coals  and  adequate draft.  The damper is then
closed.   The  gases must then move  down under the vertical baffle,
 the flame is  developed horizontally to the fuel bed, and the  gases
and flame ideally  come in  contact  at the baffle point before  passing
out the flue exit.

      The S-flow,  or  horizontal baffle, stove is equipped with both
a primary and  a secondary  air inlet, like the updraft stove.
Retention time within  the  stove is a function of both the rate of
burn and the length  of  the smoke path.  To lengthen the retention
 time,  gases  are kept  from exiting directly up the flue by a metal
baffle plate  located  several inches above the burning wood.   The
baffle plate absorbs  a considerable amount of heat and reflects  and
radiates much  of  it  back to  the firebox.  The longer gas phase
residence time results in improved combustion when the proper
amounts of  air are provided, and it enhances heat transfer from  the
 gas phase. <-

 1.1  Identification  of Pollutants

      Residential  combustion of wood produces atmospheric emissions
of  particulates,  sulfur oxides, nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide,
organic materials  including polycyclic organic matter (POM),  and
mineral constituents.   Organic species, carbon monoxide and,  to  a
large  extent,  the  particulate matter emissions result from incomplete

-------
                                              J
                                                 ZUjLHl
                                                                      sc
                                                                           s*
                   Air
            Or Up Drill
-l

B  B   B
                              P - Primary Air Supply
                              S - Secondary Air Supply
                              E - Exhaust to Slack
                              B — Primary Burning
                              SC — Secondary Combustion
                             \
                                       J
                   sc
                      f
         Side or Cross Draft
                                                   Down Draft
                                                            SC
                                                  B
                                                 B
                                                B
                                                    SFlow
         Figure 1      Generic designs of wood  stoves based on flow  paths.

-------
combustion of the fuel.   Efficient  combustion  tends to limit
emissions of carbon monoxide  and  volatile  organic compounds by
oxidizing these compounds to  carbon  dioxide  and water.  Sulfur
oxides arise from oxidation of  fuel  sulfur,  while nitrogen oxides
are formed both from  fuel nitrogen and by  the combination of atmospheric
nitrogen with oxygen  in  the combustion zone.  Mineral  constituents
in the particulate emissions  result  from minerals  released from  the
wood matrix during combustion and entrained  in the  combustion
gases.

     Wood smoke is composed of  unburned fuel - combustible  gases,
droplets and solid particulates.   Part of  the organic compounds  in
smoke often condenses in the  chimney or flue pipe.   This tar-like
substance is called creosote.   If the combustion zone temperature
is sufficiently high, creosote burns with the other organic compounds
in the wood.  However, creosote burns at a higher temperature than
other chemicals in the wood,  so there are  times when it is not
burned with the other products.  Creosote  deposits are a fire
hazard,  but they  can  be  reduced if the exhaust ductwork is insulated
to prevent creosote condensation, or the exhaust system is cleaned
regularly  to remove any  buildup.

      Polycyclic organic  material  (POM) , a.  minor but potentially
important  component of wood smoke, is a group of organic compounds
which  includes potential carcinogens such  as benzo(a)pyrene (BaP).
POM  results from  the  combination  of  free radical species formed in
the  flame  zone, primarily as  a consequence of incomplete combustion.
Under  reducing conditions,  radical chain propagation is enhanced,
allowing the buildup  of  complex organic material such as POM.  POM
is generally found in or on smoke particles, although some sublimation
into the vapor phase  is  probable.

 1.2   Variables Affecting Emission Characteristics

      Before  discussing the  effects of combustion conditions on wood
stove  emissions,  several comments should be  made.   First, residential
combustion equipment  is  difficult to fine  tune and the user is
generally  not a  trained  operator.  Also, because of the small size
of  the  combustors,  the low  flue gas  flow rates, and the many types,
sizes,  and  methods of firing  the  wood, exact quantitative measurements
are  hard to  make.   Because  of the difficult  nature of residential
wood heating  emissions characterization, the results measured in
different  efforts are often contradictory.4

      Emissions  from  any  one stove are highly variable and correspond
directly to  different stages  in the  burning  cycle.   A new charge of
wood produces a  quick drop  in firebox temperature and a dramatic
increase in  emissions, primarily organic matter.  When all of the
volatiles  have  been  driven  off, the  charcoal stage of the burn is
characterized by  relatively clean emissions.

-------
     Emissions of particulate, carbon  monoxide  and  volatile organic
compounds were found  to depend on burn rate.  Emissions  increase as
burn rates decrease,  for  the  great  majority  of  the  closed combustion
devices currently on  the  market.  A burn  rate of  approximately
three kilograms per hour  has  been determined  representative of
actual woodstove operation. 18,21

     Wood is a complex  fuel,  and  the combined processes  of  combustion
and pyrolysis which occur in  a wood heater are  affected  by  changes
in the composition of the fuel, moisture  content  and  the effective
burning surface area. 2,4  The moisture content  of wood depends on
the type of wood and  the  amount of  time it has  been dried (seasoned).
The water in the wood increases the amount of heat  required to
raise the wood to its combustion  point, thus  reducing  the rate of
pyrolysis until moisture  is released.   Wood  moisture has been  found
to have little affect on  emissions.  Dry  wood (less than 15 percent
moisture content) may produce slightly higher emissions  than the
commonly occuring 30  to 40 percent  moisture  wood.   However,  firing
very wet wood may produce higher  emissions due  to smoldering and
reduced burn rate.  The size  of the wood  also has a large effect on
the rate of pyrolysis.  For smaller pieces of wood, there is a
shorter distance for  the  pyrolysis  products  to  diffuse,  a larger
surface area-to-mass  ratio, and a reduction  in  the  time  required to
heat the entire piece of  wood.  One effect of log size is to change
the distribution of organics  among  the different  effluents  (creosote,
particulate matter and  condensible  organics)  for  a  given burn  rate. 14
These results also indicate that  the distribution of the total
organic effluent among  creosote,  particulate  matter and  condensibles
is a function of firebox  and  sample probe temperatures.

     Results of ultimate  analysis (for carbon,  hydrogen  and oxygen)
of dry wood types are within  one  to two percent for the  majority of
all species.  The inherent difference  between softwood and  hardwood
is the greater amount of  resins in  softwoods, which increases  their
heating value by weight.

     Several combustion modification techniques are available  to
reduce emissions from wood stoves,  with varying degrees  of  effectiveness,
Some techniques relate  to modified  stove  design and others  to
operator practices.   Proper modifications of  stove  design (1)  will
reduce pollutant formation in the fuel magazine or  in  the primary
combustion zone or (2) will cause previously  formed emissions  to be
destroyed in the primary  or secondary  combustion  zones.15

     A recent wood stove  emission control development  is the catalytic
converter, a transfer technology  from  the automobile.  The  catalytic
converter is a noble metal catalyst, such as  palladium,  coated on
ceramic honeycomb substrates  and  placed directly  in the  exhaust gas
flow,  where it reduces the ignition temperature (flash point)  of
the unburned hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide.  Retrofit cayalysts
tend to be installed in the flue  pipe  farther downstream of the
woodstove firebox than  built-in  catalysts.   Thus,  adequate catalyst

-------
operating temperatures may not  be  achieved  with  the  add on  type,
resulting in potential flue  gas  blockage  and  fire hazards.  Limited
testing of built-in designs  indicates  that  carbon monoxide  and
total hydrocarbon emissions  are  reduced  considerably,  and efficiency
is improved, by the catalyst effect.   Some  initial  findings also
indicate that emissions of nitrogen oxides  may be  increased by  as
much as a factor of three.   Additionally, there is  concern  that
combustion temperatures achieved in stoves  operating at representative
burn rates (approximately 3  kilograms  per hour or  less) are not
adequate to "light off" the  catalyst.  Thus,  the catalytic  unit
might reduce emissions but not  under all  burning conditions. 22

     In light of the relationships  between  wood stove emissions and
variables affecting these emission characteristics  both quanti-
tatively and qualitatively,  the  variables employed  in various
studies' should be noted  (see Appendix  A) .  The importance of  these
relationships is that  they suggest  a need to  carry  out environmental
testing over appropriate ranges  that can  be related to actual stove
usages.

-------
             2.0   PROCEDURE  FOR  REVISION  OF  EMISSION FACTORS

     In the course of  this project  a  search  was  conducted to identify
programs in which  actual measurements of  woodstove emissions have
been or are being  made, wherein  some  correlation is  possible with
woodstove design and operating conditions.   The  programs  are few,
and there has been no  consistency in  emission  testing protocol  for
woodstove configuration or operation, sampling of emissions, analysis
of collected samples,  and interpretation  of  results.

     Major problems exist in the characterization of  the  chimney
and draft systems  used which have significant  effects on  both stove
operation and ultimate emissions, and emission sampling systems
used which arbitrarily separate  gaseous from particulate  emissions
depending on the temperatures of the  point of  particulate capture
and retention.  Although the measurements and  observations  of
emissions have  been related  to stove  parameters,  these other factors
can materially  affect  the emissions as measured.

     As will be described, there is a wide range  in  some  of  the
values listed.  Also,  some of the numbers listed  are  only based on
a limited number of measurements and  the  operating conditions under
which these measurements were made  were not  always what might be
considered typical.

2.1  Nitrogen Oxide Emissions

     Nitrogen oxide formation depends primarily  on fuel nitrogen
content, amount of excess air used, combustion temperature,  and
design of combustion equipment.  NOX  emissions from  wood  stove
combustion were found  to range from 0.1 g/kg to  7.1  g/kg  for wood
stoves (references 3,  4, 15,  17, 22,  and  23).  An average NOX
emission factor of 1.4 g/kg  (2.8 Ib/ton)  was determined from test
data plotted on Histogram 2-1.

     A statistical analysis  was  performed by DeAngelis, et  al.,  to
determine the effect of combustion  equipment and  wood type  on
nitrogen oxide  emission rates.   The results  support  the observed
difference in nitrogen oxide  emissions between fireplaces and
stoves; however, no significant  difference was found  to exist
between emissions  from the wood  types tested.  The data reported by
Allen and Cooke15  indicates  a trend for NOx  emissions to  increase
as excess Oo increased for stoves tested.

     Recent studies have shown emissions  of  nitrogen oxides  to  be
up to three times greater from a catalytic stove  in  comparison  to a
non-catalytic unit.22

-------
                                                                       4
                                                                       A
oo
            V
                                                                                   * 2?
                      C-

                              l-o
                                          C
                                              C-

                                        z-a
M.
 g.

-------
2.2  Sulfur Oxide  Emissions

     Sulfur oxides  are  formed  during combustion by the oxidation of
sulfur in  the  fuel.   The  sulfur  content  of  wood is low,  typically
ranging  from 0.02  to  0.1  weight  percent  in  branches and  wood components.

     DeAngelis  has examined emissions  of  sulfur oxides  during
residential wood combustion, and that study was limited  to two
tests using EPA Method  6.  Results  were  close to the detection
limit for  the  method, and gave emission  factors of 0.16  g/kg and
0.24 g/kg.   These  values are  nearly equal  to those expected based
on material balance considerations,  assuming 100 percent conversion
of fuel  sulfur to  S02-   In both  cases,  if  all the sulfur were
converted  to S02,  the emissions  would be 0.2 g/kg, which is what
was found.

2.3  Carbon Monoxide  Emissions

     Histogram 2-2  lists  carbon  monoxide emission data from wood
fired stoves.  Reported  emissions ranged from 10 g/kg to 420 g/kg
and were found to  be  dependent on burn  rate.   For the purpose of
establishing an emission  factor, a  burn  rate of 3 kg/hr  was determined
to be representative  of  actual woodstove operation.  18,21  Data
taken at this  burn  rate  or below were arithmatically averaged to
obtain an  emission  factor of 130 g/kg (260  Ib/ton).   Low and high
burn rate  data are  plotted separately on Historgram 2-2  in order
that a trend can more easily be  seen. Averaging of  only high burn
rate data  yielded  an  emission  factor of  106 g/kg;  a 25 percent
decrease relative  to  the  low burn rate  factor.

     Findings  by Hayden  and Braaten  ' ' indicate  a tendency for lower
carbon monoxide emissions as the firing  rate was increased for the
same stove.  The excess  air level decreased at  the same  time.   They
also found that the side  draft type  of  stove gave the least CO
emissions  of the stoves  they tested.  The data  collected by the
California Air Resources  Board 17 show less  emissions for a Fisher
stove over a Franklin,  but these two stoves on  the average showed
less carbon monoxide  emissions than  the  stoves  tested by DeAngelis,
etal.4  .The stoves tested by  DeAngelis  were operated at a much
larger heat input  rate  and, in fact,  at  a rate  which is  probably
higher than they would  normally  use.  For  these tests on different
stoves, higher loads were giving higher  carbon  monoxide  emission
rates.   The study by DeAngelis,  et  al. ,4 indicates that  carbon
monoxide formation  is very sensitive to  changing fuel bed conditions
which may account for the variability between replicate  test results.
The actual carbon monoxide emissions will vary  with time as the
wood is burned up and more is  added.  Figure 2  presents  carbon
monoxide concentrations  in the flue  gas  from a  wood-burning stove
versus time over one combustion  cycle (i.e.,  one fuel loading
charge).   This graph shows greater  than  an  order of  magnitude
change in carbon monoxide  concentration  in  20 minutes.
22

-------
Z.-Z-
A.
c.
•p-
f.
i
                                                O
                                                n
                                                                ZZ

-------
                                                          70  J3
                            TIME I WTO IURMNB CTOfc «in
Figure 2      Carbon monoxide concentration in the flue gas from  a wood-
              burning stove as a function of time.
                                      n

-------
     Data collected by Allen and Cooke    on  a Defiant stove operated
in the side draft mode did not  show  that  this type of operation
emitted less carbon monoxide as found by  Hayden  and Braaten.   For
some stoves, Allen and Cooke did find less carbon monoxide emitted
on a g/kg basis as the burning  rate  increased.   They  also found
more carbon monoxide emissions  from  smaller  pieces of wood  (air
dried oak).  They did not find  any  trend  in  carbon monoxide emissions
due to moisture content of the wood.  For the airtight  appliance,
it seems that CO emissions for  cordwood  fuel decrease as burn rate
increases while emissions for the oak brands increase with  increasing
burn rates.

2.4  Particulate Emissions

     Though the data base is still  limited,  particulate matter has
probably been the most studied  emission  from stoves.   Interpretation
of particulate emissions data is difficult because  of the large
amount of  condensible organic material present  in  the exhaust gas.
Test results are strongly dependent  on the methods  used to  collect
samples, and different studies  have  employed different methods
(i.e., high-volume sampling and EPA  Method 5)-   The  standard  method
recognized  by EPA for collection of  particulate  samples is  EPA
Method 5.   Normally everything  collected  on  or  before the filter in
the front  half of the sampling  train is  considered  the particulate
catch.   The front-half catch is made up  both of  organic and inorganic
materials.  A major frjictipn of the  gases passing  through the front
filter is  cjondensed in the back-half of  the  Method  5  sampling
train.   These condensed organics are made up of  hydrocarbons  and
oxygenated (C-0) species.  As is commonly done,  the  condensed
or_ganics_ were added to the front filter  catch  to determine  the
emission factor  for total particulates.
                                                    Q
     The Oregon  Department of Environmental  Quality   found  approximately
60 percent of  the mass of particulate emissions  to  be condensible
organic  materials, which are gaseous in  the  stack but condense td
form  liquid droplets  in the atmosphere.   In  addition,  a consistent
emissions  pattern was observed  in which  the  greatest  mass of  particulates
were  emitted during the early stages of  the  burn (i.e., over  50 percent
of the emissions captured by filter  occurred during  the first
17 percent of  the burn period).  This is  consistent with data
reported by Butcher and Sorenson. °

     Thirteen studies have characterized  total  particulate  emissions
from residential wood stoves  (Reference  nos. 3,4,5,6,8,9,10,13,14,
17,22,24,  and 25).  As shown in Histogram 2-3,  total  particulate
emissions  (i.e., front and back-half catch combined)  ranged from
0.5 g/kg to 97.3 g/kg and were  found to  be dependent  on burn  rate.
For the  purpose  of establishing an  emission  factor,  a burn  rate of
3 kg/hr  was determined to be representative  of  actual woodstove
operation.  18,21 Data taken at  this  burn  rate or below were arithmetically
averaged to obtain an emission  factor of  21  g/kg (42  Ib/ton).
Low and  high burn rate data are plotted  separately  on Histogram 2-3
                                12

-------
                                  2-3
I
       /a - -
A
z.
M.y
>.4
                                                                                  tef-

                                                                                       ».&
                                                                                         1
                                                                                                  H.
 .  /3

\.  /7
».  zz
,.  24
>.  25"
             O     n

             D    T
                                                                                                     At
                                                                                   _
                                                                                  O

-------
in order that a trend can more  easily  be  seen.   Averaging  of  only
high burn rate data yielded an  emission factor  of  9.2  g/kg; a
decrease of approximately 57 percent relative  to the low burn rate
factor.  The low burn rate factor has  been derived and footnoted
to the effect that burn rates greater  than 3 kg/hr may result
in particulate emission reductions  of  55  to 60  percent.

                     18
     Barnett and Shea   measured less  particulate matter emissions
from wet wood (30 to 40 percent moisture)  than  from drier  wood
(20 percent moisture).  This is based  on  one test and data from the
other authors do not necessarily support  this.

     Barnett and Shea were able to  modify stove design to lower
particulate emissions.  By modifying the  draft  opening locations
they were able to reduce particulate matter emissions by up to
50 percent.  The stove modified had no internal baffles and was
tested over the range of 0.01 to 0.03  kg/min of wood burned.   They
also tested other stove designs and found that  the low crossdraft
type of  internal baffle gave the least emissions.   It should be
noted  that at high heat input rates, DeAngelis, et al.4, found no
difference in particulate matter emission rates between the two
stoves (baffled and unbaffled)  that they  tested.

                              14
     A study by Hubble, et al.   suggests that  one effect  of log
size,  as well as firebox temperature,  is  to change the distribution
of organics between the different effluents (i.e., creosote,
particulate matter, and condensible organics).

     Although the methods of collection and quantification are not
consistent, each study indicates a  degree of variability in emission
factors  which can be attributed to  the variable nature of  the
combustion process. • Factors such as the  addition of fresh wood
charges, fuel bed configuration, size  of  fuel  charge,  etc., all
have some  effect on emissions generated from wood stoves.

2.5  Volatile Organic Compound  Emissions

     The organic emission data  have been  reported in several  different
forms.   It has been reported as total  hydrocarbon emissions,  condensible
organics, volatile hydrocarbons, and by classes such as POMs.
Hydrocarbon emissions from wood-burning stoves  have been measured
in seven studies  (Reference nos. 3,4,11,15,17,22 and 23).   Measurement
of volatile hydrocarbons was accomplished in three studies 3,4,17 by
collection of a gas sample in an inert gas sampling bag and subsequent
injection  into a gas chromatograph  with a flame ionization detector
(GC/FID).  Continuous flue gas  monitors were utilized by the  TVA studies 22,23
The studies by Hayden and Braaten TI, Allen and  Cooke 15, and TVA,
refer  to emissions as "total hydrocarbons" and  label the data as a
semi-quantitative measurement of all organics.

     The study by Kosel '' indicates that  comparison of emission
factors  for volatile organic compounds may be  difficult because of
the divergent test methodologies involved.  Some studies may group

                                     14

-------
                                                                           A-
                                                                           8.
                                                                           c.
                                                                      . 3
                                                                     - 4
                                                                                      - n
                                                                                   /)*•

           6
f-
     13
   A e
t> o t>
                        6
e£
                          t.
             SL
           £.£
                                     f
                                       c.
                                            L t>
                                                           @L
                                                                      O
                                                                      D
                                                                                              - /n

-------
volatile organics with particulate  matter,  since  all  test programs
found particulate matter to consist largely of  condensed organic
compounds (back-half catch).
     The data show a tendency  for  higher  burning  rates  to  produce
lower total hydrocarbon emission rates; however,  this  is only  a
trend and the data do not always show  the emissions  rate decreasing
as the heat input rate increases.   Allen  and Cooke 15 found that
smaller pieces of wood produced  less  total hydrocarbon emissions
but got mixed results for the  effects  of  dry wood.

     Histogram 2-4 lists volatile  organic compound emissions from
wood stoves.  Volatile hydrocarbons represent those  hydrocarbons
that will remain as gases when dispersed  within the  atmosphere.
Those hydrocarbon having high  molecular weights will condense when
diluted with ambient air.   The measured values ranged from 0.3 g/kg
to 113 g/kg.  It became evident  early  in  the review  process that
emissions of VOC were very  dependent on burning rate.   High emissions
associated with low burning rates  (hold-fire conditions) were
observed.

     The VOC emission factor is  based  on  low burn rate data only
(less than 3 kg/hr).  In all,  25 data  points were obtained at burn
rates of 3 kg/hr or less.   Based on 25 data points,  an average VOC
emission factor of 51 g/kg  (100  Ib/ton) was determined.  Using high
burn rate data  (117 data points) an average emission factor of
approximately 26 g/kg was obtained.  Therefore, a footnote was
added to the emission factor table stating that if burn rates of
greater than 3 kg/hr were employed, VOC emissions may decrease by
as much as 55 to 60 percent.  VOC  speciation performed by  DeAngelis,
et al.4 found approximately 0.5  g/kg of the low-molecular-weight
hydrocarbon emissions to consist of methane (see  Table 1).

2.5.1  Polycyclic Organic Materials  (POM's)

     Polycyclic organic matter (POM) can  be formed in any  combustion
process involving compounds of carbon  and hydrogen.   It is uncertain
whether POM condenses out as discrete  particles after cooling or
condenses on surfaces of existing  particles after formation during
combustion.  POM molecules  have  a  high free energy of  sublimation
and several recent publications  dealt  with the gas-phase solid-phase
equilibrium in source and ambient  samples.  The implication of this
work is that gas-phase POM  would have  greater access  to the deep
lung than particulate associated POM.  The vapor-solid equilibrium
that exists in ambient air  between discrete polycyclic organic
compounds and ambient particulate  matter  is the subject of a great
deal of current research.   Most  of the mass of POM is  associated
with particles of aerodynamic  diameters in the respirable  size
range, 15,19
                                16

-------
                        TABLE 1        LOW-MOLECULAR-WEIGET  HYDROCARBON  EMISSIONS'
                                                               (g/Xg)

Emission scecies
Methane, CJU
Ci to Ca hydrocarbons
Ethylene, CaH»
Ethane, CaH«
Ca to C3 hydrocarbons
Propylene, C3H«
Propane, C3H«
C3 to C« hydrocarbons
Butyl ene, G»H«
Butane, G»Hi0
C« to Cs hydrocarbons
Pentene, CsHio
Pentane, CsHia
Cs to C« hydrocarbons
Hexene, C«Hi3
Hexane, C«Hi»
>C« hydrocarbons
Total
Note: Blanks indicate
a
Fireolace Baffled stove
seasoned oaX seasoned Dine
0.5
0.2
0.5 0.3
0.1

0.08
0.08
0.5


15 0.5
<0.08

2.6


0.5 0.5
19 2.3
emissions not detected.

Nonbaffled stove
Green oaX Green pine

0.02




2.4

0.04

0.6


0.3



0.3 3.0


                  Determined by  GC/FID at test  site.
                                                  TABLE     2    POM  EMISSIONS
                                                                 (g/kg)
                                                  ***» «•*-
AathracMM/ptonantAra
MtAyl-anc

Cyalapw>ca-«ichncm««/-ph«aantlira
FluoronclMM
 Mthyl-fluoran
ta*> ««"'nttir«c«n««
      -b««tr«ainn
•KAyl coolant
ladaao < 1.1. J^d) pyrxx
                                        O.XM3
                                       
-------
     Emissions of organic  material  greater than Cg were  collected
for analysis by the  POM  train (a  Method 5 procedure modified  by the
addition of an XAD-2  resin trap between the filter and impinger
system) and the source analysis sampling system (SASS). 4,14,15
Most organic compounds with boiling points above 120°C,  and several
that have boiling points between  100 to 120°C,  are collected  by the
XAD-2 resin used in  the  POM train.   The SASS train system employs a
set of three cyclones and  a filter  for particle size fractionation
in addition to a solid sorbent (XAD-2) trap for organic species.
The condensed organic material was  extracted from the XAD-2 resin
and from the remainder of  the sampling train and submitted for
analysis by GC/MS.

     The average factors for wood stove emissions were found by
DeAngelis, et al.4 to range from  0.19 g/kg to 0.37 g/kg.  An attempt
was made to identify the organic  compounds present in the flue  gas
 (see Table 2).  Allen and  Cooke 15 also measured POM emissions from
wood stoves.  Their  values averaged about 0.03 g/kg (0.01 to 0.05 g/kg
 range) which is much less  than the  values measured by DeAngelis.
 Both sets of  tests were  conducted at fuel feed rates of about 0.12
 to 0.18 kg/min.  There were no apparent reasons for the differences
 in  the data.

                                         ?2 23
     POM emissions data  obtained  by TVA t}, are in general agreement
 with the Monsanto^ results for high gurn rates, but low burn rate
 POM emission  factors were  not obtained in the Monsanto study.
 TVA's  results also compare closely  with a similar POM emission
 factor reported  in a Battelle study! Swhere again POM emission
 factors  at  low burn  rates  were not  reported.  The Argonne Laboratory
 study'^reported  two  POM  emission  factors, one at a low burn rate
 and another  at a medium  burn rate.   Both are much lower than any
 POM results  obtained by  either TVA, Monsanto, or Battelle.  The
 small  recovery of POM material associated with the Argonne test
 effort could  possibly be associated with the sample recovery system
 used by  Argonne  Laboratory.  The  TVA, Monsanto, and Battelle studies
 added  an XAD-2 resin trap  to the  EPA Method 5 Sampling System
 specifically  to  recover  organics  from the flue gases.   The Argonne
 study  did  not use  an XAD-2 trap  or any specific mechanism designed
 to trap  organics.  The Argonne study reported very low temperatures
 at its  impingers, but the  impingers alone are not considered adequate
 for entrapment of  the very diverse range of organics associated
 with wood  combustion flue  gases.   Differences in the handling
 procedure  and type  of gas  chromatography employed in quantification
 of the POMs  may  have also  contributed to the smaller POM recovery
 in the Argonne study. TVA observed that there is a general tendency
 for POM  emission factors to increase with decreasing burn rate.
 This does  not  support the  commonly espoused principle held by some
 that  relates  increased  POM emission factors with increased thermal
 activity,  burn rate, and stove exit temperature.
                                     18

-------
                    3.0   EMISSION  FACTOR RATINGS

     The data base  on emissions from  residential  wood  combustion
equipment is both limited  and  diverse.   The  apparent  differences in
experimental results are probably  due to legitimate but  not  well
defined differences, including:   (1)  difficulty  in quantifying and
controlling combustion  conditions,  (2)  variety in sizes  and  designs
of equipment, (3) nonuniformity in properties and condition  of
wood, and (4) different firing methods  and firing conditions.
Although the important  parameters  affecting  emissions  are  not  well
characterized,  the  major ones  appear  to be combustion  design,
firing rate, and excess air  level.

     Findings are indicative rather than conclusive due  to
difficulties in comparing  tests of diverse methodologies.  For an
explanation of  emission factor ratings  as discussed in this  section,
refer to the document "Technical  Procedures  for  Developing AP-42
Emission Factors and Preparing AP-42  Sections", Monitoring and Data
Analysis Division,  Research  Triangle  Park, North  Carolina, April 1980.

     Most of the tests  performed were based  on a  sound methodology
and  reported in enough  detail  for  adequate validation; however,  in
the  case of particulate emission measurements, several studies were
based on methodologies  (i.e.,  high-volume sampling) that are not
necessarily EPA reference  method  tests.   Some data were  excluded
from consideration  because of  test series representing incompatible
test methods (i.e., comparison of  EPA Method 5 front-half  with EPA
Method 5 front- and back-half).   The  EPA Method  5 procedure  for
particulates proved to  be  difficult to  adapt to woodstove  sampling;
extremely low velocities and sample rates, stack  diameters are
generally smaller than  the minimum (12  inches) for which the EPA
method is specified, and the labor intensity involved.  However,
the  manner in which the sources were  operated is  well  documented in
the  reports, and most sources  were operating within typical  parameters
during the test.  For these  reasons a C rating is assigned to  the
particulate emission factors.

     Many variations can occur during testing which cannot be
explained.  Such variations  can induce  wide  deviations in  sampling
results.  In the case of VOCs, a  large  variance  between  test
results was not explained  by information contained in  the  test
reports and some of the data are  suspect.  An emission factor
rating of D is  therefore assigned  to  VOCs.

     Nitrogen oxide and carbon monoxide emissions sampling were
performed according to  EPA Methods  7  and 3,  respectively,  and
results are fairly  consistent  among the studies  conducted.   However,
due  to the limited number  of data  points available, these  pollutants
will each be assigned a C  rating.
                                19

-------
     Sulfur oxide emission factors were determined  from material
balance based on the sulfur content of wood fuel.   This value was
further confirmed by testing and is assigned an A rating.
                                20

-------
                 4.0  REFERENCES  FOR  SECTION  1.10

1.    H. I. Lips and K. J. Lim, Assessment of  Emissions  from
     Residential and  Industrial Wood  Combustion, EPA  Contract
     No. 68-02-3188,  Acurex Corporation, Mountain View,   CA,
     April 1981.

2.    D. G. DeAngelis, et al.,  Source  Assessment:  Residential
     Combustion of Wood. EPA-600/2-80-042b, U.S. Environmental
     Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., March  1980.

3.    J. A. Cooper, "Environmental  Impact of Residential Wood
     Combustion Emissions and  Its  Implications", Journal  of  the
     Air Pollution Control Association, _30.(8): 855-861, August  1980.

4.    D. G. DeAngelis, et al.,  Preliminary Characterization  of
     Emissions from Wood-fired Residential Combustion Equipment,
     EPA-600/7-80-040, U.S. Environmental Protection  Agency,
     Washington, B.C., March  1980.

5.    S. S. Butcher and D. I.  Buckley,  "A Preliminary  Study  of
     Particulate Emissions from Small  Wood Stoves", Journal of  the
     Air Pollution Control Association, _27_(4): 346-348, April 1977.

6.    S. S. Butcher and E. M.  Sorenson,  "A Study  of Wood Stove
     Pariculate Emissions", Journal of the Air Pollution  Control
     Association, _29_(9): 724-728,  July  1979.

7.    J. W. Shelton, et al. , "Wood  Stove Testing  Methods and Some
     Preliminary Experimental  Results", Presented at  the  American
     Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Engineers
     (ASHRAE) Symposium, Atlanta,  GA,  January  1978.

8.    D. Rossman, et al., "Evaluation  of Wood  Stove Emissions",
     Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, Portland,  OR,
     December 1980.

9.    P. Tiegs, et al. , "Emission  Test  Report  on  Four  Selected
     Wood Burning Home Heating Devices", Oregon  Department  of Energy,
     Portland, OR, January 1981.

10.  J. A. Peters and D. G. DeAngelis, High Altitude  Testing of
     Residential Wood-fired Combustion Equipment, EPA-600/S2-31-127,
     U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.,
     September 1981.

11.  A. C. S. Hayden  and R. W. Braaten, "Performance  of Domestic
     Wood-fired Appliances",  Presented at 73rd Annual Meeting of
     the Air Pollution Control Association, Montreal, Canada,
     June 1980.
                                   21

-------
12.   R.  J. Brandon, "An Assessment of the Efficiency and Emissions
     of  Ten Wood-fired Furnaces", Presented at the Conference on
     Wood Combustion Environmental Assessment, New Orleans, LA,
     February 1981.

13.   B.  R. Hubble and J. B. L. Harkness, "Results of Laboratory
     Tests on Wood-stove Emissions and Efficiencies", Presented at
     the Conference on Wood Combustion Environmental Assessment,
     New Orleans, LA, February 1981.

14.   B.  R. Hubble, et al.,  "Experimental Measurements of Emissions
     from Residential Wood-burning Stoves", Presented at the
     International Conference on Residential Solid Fuels, Portland,
     OR, June 1981.

15.   J.  M. Allen and W. M.  Cooke, "Control of Emissions from Residential
     Wood Burning by Combustion Modification," EPA Contract No.
     68-02-2686, Battelle  Laboratories,  Columbus, OH, November 1980.

16.   J.  R. Duncan, et al.,  "Air Quality Impact Potential from
     Residential Wood-burning Stoves", TVA Report 80-7.2, Tennessee
     Valley Authority, Muscle Shoals, AL, March 1980.

17.   P.  Kosel, et al., "Emissions from Residential Fireplaces",
     GARB Report C-80-027,  California Air Resources Board, Sacramento,
     CA, April 1980.

18.   S.  G. Barnett and D.  Shea, "Effects of Wood Burning Stove
     Design on Particulate  Pollution", Oregon Department of
     Environmental Quality, Portland, OR, July 1980.

19.   J.A. Peters, POM Emissions from Residential Woodburning:
     An Environmental Assessment, Monsanto Research Corporation,
     Dayton, OH, May 1981.

20.   Source Testing for Fireplaces, Stoves, and Restaurant Grills
     in Vail, Colorado (Draft), EPA Contract No. 68-01-1999, Pedco-
     Environmental, Inc.,  December 1977.

21.   A.C.S. Hayden and R.W. Braaten,  "Effects of Firing Rate and
     Design on Domestic Wood Stove Performance", Canadian Combustion
     Research Laboratory,  Ottawa, Canada.  Presented at the Residential
     Wood and Coal Combustion Specialty Conference, Louisville, KY,
     March 1982,

22.   C.V. Knight and M.S.  Graham, "Emissions and Thermal Performance
     Mapping for an Unbaffled, Airtight Wood Appliance and a Box
     Type Catalytic Appliance", Proceedings of 1981 International
     Conference on Residential Solid Fuels, Oregon Graduate Center,
     Portland, Oregon, June 1981.
                                22

-------
23.  C.V. Knight et. al., "Tennessee Valley Authority Residential
     Wood Heater Test Report:  Phase I Testing", Tennessee Valley
     Authority, Chattanooga, Tennessee, November 1982.

24.  Richard L. Poirot and Cedric R. Sanborn, "Improved Combustion
     Efficiency of Residential Wood Stoves", prepared for U.S.
     Department of Energy, Grant no. DE-FG41-80R110340, September 1981,

25.  Cedric R. Sanborn, et. al., "Waterbury, Vermont:  A Case Study
     of Residential Woodburning", Vermont Agency of Environmental
     Conservation, August 1981.
                                   23

-------
         Appendix A




Emission Measurement Programs
              24

-------
                            APPENDIX A

                   Emission Measurement Programs

A-l.  Acurex Corporation (Reference No. 1)

     Lips and Lim, 1981

     An assessment is made of emissions and their control  from
wood-fired boilers, home stoves, and fireplaces.  Although  the  data
base is limited and diverse, the important parameters affecting
emissions appear to be combustor design, excess air level,  and
burning rate.  For boilers, optimal emissions control and  efficiency
are achieved with 50 to 200 percent excess air, with overfire air
maximized for stokers.  Data on other combustion modification
techniques and operational impacts are minimal.  On a normalized
basis, residential wood-burning units tend to produce higher emissions
than do boilers.  Data on wood-fired stoves indicate that  certain
designs, e.g., crossdraft, emit less particulate matter.   The
limited data suggest that the low burning rates, typical of home
stoves, are conducive to POM formation, a pollutant of major concern.
As the combustion conditions for fireplaces are even more  difficult
to quantify and control, emission trends for those devices  are  less
well established.  However, POM emissions appear to be lower from
fireplaces than from stoves.

A-2.  Monsanto Research Corporation (Reference No. 2)

     DeAngelis, et al., 1980

     This report presents a review of characterization data for
emissions from residential wood combustion and an evaluation of
their potential environmental effects.  It describes several types
of residential wood combustion equipment, the 1976 geographic
distribution of wood-fired equipment, fuel characteristics, and
combustion chemistry.  Primary and secondary wood heating,  as well
as wood burning for aesthetic purposes, are all covered in  the
report.  Emission control technology and possible future trends of
the source are also discussed.

A-3.  Oregon Graduate Center (Reference No. 3)

     Cooper, 1980

     The primary objectives of this study were to review the available
information on potential environmental impacts of residential wood
combustion, note areas of conflicting data, and suggest areas of
future research.

     The study concludes that emissions from residential wood
combustion appliances are a major source of winter air pollution in
a large part of the country.  These emissions, if allowed  to increase,
will likely have a significant impact on public health, current and
future EPA standards, industrial growth, and EPA regulatory policy.
                                 25

-------
A-4.  Monsanto Research Corporation  (Reference No.  4)

     DeAngelis. 1979

     Tests were conducted early in 1979 at Auburn University.   The
University staff operated the stoves and measured the efficiencies,
and Monsanto staff conducted the measurement and analysis program.
Two similar stoves and a fireplace were operated burning both pine
and oak cardwood, using both seasoned and green wood.   In addition
to the normal combustion gases  (0  ,  CO  , SO , NO ,  and  CO),  the
emission measurements included particulate matter,  condensable
organics, volatile organics, aldehydes, major organic species, and
polycyclic organic species.  The tests were all operated at  rela-
tively high burning rates, and did not demonstrate  the  effects of
burning rate on emissions.  No significant differences  were  found
in criteria pollutant emissions or efficiencies between the  baffled
and nonbaffled stoves.

     The effects of wood type and moisture content  were shown to be
generally low, with green pine producing particulate and organic
emissions slightly higher than  the other three woods burned.  Many
POM species were identified in the stack emissions  (particulates
and gaseous samples combined) and bioassays of these specimens were
found to be both mutagenic and cytotoxic.

A-5.  Bowdoin College, Maine (Reference No. 5)

     Butcher. 1977

     This was a preliminary study of particulate emissions from
small wood stoves.  The results of this test program were used to
develop the particulate emission factor range originally published
in the AP-42.

     Two stoves (baffled and nonbaffled) were tested during  this
1977 study.  The sampling method used consisted of  collecting all
stack emissions for selected time intervals with a  high-volume
sampler.  For this purpose a 4 foot  diameter sheet  metal cone,
connected to the high-volume sampler, was positioned over the flue.
The dependence of the emission factor on draft setting  indicated an
increase in the emission factor as the available air was reduced.

A-6.  Bowdoin College, Maine (Reference No. 6)

     Butcher, 1979

     This experimental program has focused on particulate emissions
at low burning rates.  All emitted particulate matter was collected
on a filter after the flue gas has been cooled and  diluted with
large quantities of fresh air.   No gas composition  or excess air
measurements have been made.  The implication of the particulate
collection system is that all organic emissions condensible  at
ambient conditions will be collected as particles.  Approximately
half of the particulate matter collected has been benzene extractable.
Nearly half of this extractable material is neutral with regards  to
acid-base extraction procedures, and this fraction  would presumably
contain the polycyclic emissions.
                                   26

-------
     This study has shown that the particulate emission  factor
varies proportionally with the weight of the initial  fuel charge
and with the reciprocal of actual burning rate.

A-7.  Williams College (Reference No. 7)

     Shelton, et al., 1978

     This study summarizes wood stove testing methodologies  currently
in practice.  Indications are that consideration of the  assumptions
behind use of the stack loss method, as usually practiced for
determining the energy efficiency and heat output rate of common
heating appliances, illustrates this method's inadequacy when
applied to small wood (and coal) fueled appliances.

     In testing and rating wood stoves, careful attention must be
given not only to installation details, but also to fuel and operation
details.  Using a calorimeter room and direct measurement of flue
gas flow, it was found that dry wood does not necessarily burn more
completely than moist wood.

A-8.  Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (Reference No. 8)

     Rossman, 1980

     Source tests for particulate emissions were performed on a
typical welded steel, airtight, thermostatic controlled, wood
burning stove installed at the manufacturer's facility.  Field work
was done on September 29 and 30 and October 22, 23, and  24,  1980.

     The stove was tested in three phases; at low and high settings
as it is normally sold; at high fire with an add-on stack device
called a "Smoke Consumer"; and at low and high fire conditions with
an air control thermostat developed by Stockton Barnett  of State
University of New York.  A single sample run was made for each of
the test conditions.

     This series of testing was conducted using an EPA Method-5
type sampling train with a final filter instead of a High Volume
sampler.  This causes a significant amount of "condensible" material
that passes through the first filter in the sampler to be captured
and weighed.

     Several conclusions can be drawn from this study:

     —   About 40 percent of total measured particulate was consistently
          found to be composed of "condensible" matter.  The condensible
          fraction is defined here as that material collected
          following a high efficiency particulate filter.  This
          material is estimated to be at least 60 percent to 85 percent
          organic in nature.
                                 27

-------
     —   The majority of particulate emissions - greater  than
          90 percent - were emitted during the first half  of  each
          burn (i.e., start-up emissions).

     —   The EPA Method 5 sampling procedure adapted for  this test
          proved to be difficult for the following reasons:

          —extremely low velocities and sample rates
          —stack diameters are smaller than the minimum (12  inches)
            for which the EPA method is specified
          —labor intensity and cost

          The relatively high emissions from this stove (in comparison
          with other data reported in the literature) are  consistent
          and predictable, given that it is a simple box design and
          was tested with a maximum charge of wood and relatively
          low heat release rate - all of which are factors known to
          increase emissions.

A-9.  Oregon Department of Energy (Reference No. 9)

     Omni Environmental Services, 1981

     This report presents the results of an emission test  program
for four wood burning home heating devices conducted in January
1981.  The objectives of the study program were to better  define
the character and amount of emissions produced by burning  wood for
home heating purposes.

     The Oregon Method 7 (EPA Method 5 with a back-up filter  between
the third and fourth impingers) was used for testing of particulates.
Its advantage is that the particulate catch includes both  the
high-temperature solids and condensible materials that are emitted
through the combustion of wood.  Other methods reported in the
literature, including high-volume samplers and Method 5 trains
without the back half or condensible catch, do not provide informa-
tion on those materials which form particles at lower temperatures.
These low-temperature condensates are potentially as important to
ambient particulate levels as the high temperature materials.  For
example, the average back half catch for the tests conducted  here
was 280 percent of the front half catch.  In addition, the average
back filter was 136 percent of the front filter catch.

     Although the woodstoves were tested with drier  fuel and  under
more standardized test conditions, it is expected  that their  opera-
tion at a low to medium burning rate influenced their emission
characteristics towards the high side.

A-10.  Monsanto Research Corporation  (Reference No.  10)

     Peters and DeAngelis, 1981

     The objective of this emission testing program  was  to determine
whether emissions from operating a wood stove at high altitude
                                 28

-------
( 7,000 feet) differ from those at low altitude  (  1,000 feet),
through comparison with the MRC-low altitude data  (Reference  No.  4).
Accordingly, test conditions duplicated one of the  test conditions
from the experimental matrix of the previous study, with altitude
as the only variable.

     The wood stove was tested during the week of November  18-21,
1980.  The sample collection methods employed were  EPA Methods  1
through 5 and POM sampling by a modified Method  5 train with  an
XAD-2 resin absorbent trap.  Condensible organic emissions were
nearly identical between tests and were very close  to the value
obtained under low altitude testing conditions.  Total particulate
emissions, carbon monoxide, and polycyclic organic  matter were
analyzed, and no statistically significant difference in emissions
was found.  Although unconfirmed, it is felt that the lower combustion
zone temperatures of the high altitude test, as  indicated by  stack
gas temperature, suppressed the POM chemical formation mechanisms.
An even cooler fire should, at some point, result in zero POM
emissions since very high temperatures (at least 400-500°C) and a
chemically reducing environment are necessary for POM formation
from the long-chain molecules present in wood cellulose.

A-ll.  Canadian Combustion Research Laboratory (Reference No. 11)

     Hayden and Braaten, 1980

     This laboratory has conducted emissions analyses and efficiency
tests on wood stoves of different generic designs.  Continuous
measurements are made of CO, CO , 0 , NO , and total hydrocarbons.
Split cordwood has been burned at relatively low rates while  overall
thermal efficiencies have been determined by the stack gas  (indirect)
method.

     The results indicate that overall efficiencies fall off  at the
higher burning rates, even though the emissions  of  CO and THC per
pound of wood burned decreases and the combustion efficiency  increases.
Their comparison of generically different stoves shows a general
increase in emissions of CO and THC (Ib/lb fuel burned) as  the
burning rate is reduced.  Large variations in emissions between
different designs of updraft stoves were observed.

A-12.  Institute of Man and Resources (Reference No. 12)

     Brandon, 1979

     This organization has conducted a field demonstration  program
on ten different residential furnaces.  The emission measurements
included CO, NO , SO , and particulates, with short time emissions
measured under all operating modes of each unit.  The particulate
measuring system consisted of diluting and filtering the entire
flue gas stream in the manner used by Butcher.   The particulate
samplers operated at temperatures below 100°C, and  sampled  for
periods up to 10 minutes.  The filter catch was  extracted with
benzene and dried to determine the condensable organic content
which varied from 13 to 51 percent of the total  particulate matters
collected.
                                   29

-------
A-13.  Argonne National Laboratory  (Reference No,  13)

     Hubble and Harkness,  1981

     Results from the  testing of one generic type  of air-tight
stove (horizontally baffled, updraft) are presented as  functions  of
burn-rates and stove efficiencies.

     From the viewpoint of environmental assessment, the  results  of
this study point out the importance of  testing over an  appropriate
burn-rate range, one that  is related to actual stove usage.  Heat-output
requirements for dwellings dictate usage on the lower end of the
burn-rate range associated with commercial stove designs.  The
three parameters measured  in this study (carbon monoxide  emissions,
particulate emissions, and creosote build-up) all  increase as the
burn rate is decreased, with the latter two parameters  increasing
markedly at the lower  end  of the burn-rate range tested.  The
results show that the  worst possible effects associated with these
parameters do actually occur under the conditions  at which such
stoves are operated a  significant fraction of time.  In addition,
the log size used in the stove was shown to have an effect on
emissions, as well as  on combustion parameters.  Therefore, for
realistic environmental assessments, testing should be  done using
log-size ranges actually employed by residential stove  users.

A-14.  Argonne National Laboratory  (Reference No.  14)

     Hubble et al., 1981

     Organic emissions were measured from an air-tight  wood burning
stove operated in a manner consistent with typical residential
heating requirements.  Test data are reported for  condensible
organic and total organic  emissions as a function  of burn rate, and
estimates of emission  factors of individual organic compounds and
compound classes are given.  Test results indicate the  following:

     o  The total organic  emissions (particulate matter,  creosotes,
        and condensible organics) decrease as the  burn  rate increases.

     o  The distribution of the organic compounds  in the  total
        emissions (a function of burn rate and of  firebox tempera-
        tures) shifts  from particulate matter and  creosote to
        condensibles as the burn rate and temperatures  increase.

     o  The total organics do not exhibit a log-size effect, but
        the forms of the organics (particulate matter,  creosotes,
        and condensibles)  do exhibit such an effect.

     o  A comparison of high-burn-rate and low-burn-rate  chemical
        characterization results indicates that the high  burn rate
        produces:
                                 30

-------
        (a) a. simpler mixture of compounds;
        (b) shifts to multi-ring aromatics, and thus higher  POM
            emission rates;
        (c) greater concentrations in the condensible organic
            constituent, with corresponding decreases in particu-
            late matter and creosote.

     o  Estimated emission factors for POMs were significantly
        lower than other published results.

     o  The results of this study and previously published studies
        do not provide the required information for quantitative
        assessment of the impacts of wood stove emissions on public
        health and the environment.

A-15.  Battelle Columbus Laboratories (Reference No. 15)

     Allen and Cooke, 1981

     The report describes an exploratory study of factors contributing
to atmospheric emissions from residential wood-fired combustion
equipment.  Three commercial appliances were operated with both
normal and modified designs, providing different burning modes:
updraft with a grate, updraft with a hearth, crossdraft, downdraft,
and a high-turbulence mode utilizing a forced-draft blower.  Fuels
were naturally dried commercial oak cordwood, commercial green pine
cordwood, oven-dried fir brands, and naturally dried oak cut into
reproducible triangles.  Continuous measurements of stack gases
included 0 , CO , CO, NO , SO , and total hydrocarbons  (FID).  The
THC instrument provides a continuous indication of organic content
in the flue gas.  Because the specific composition of these organic
species is constantly changing, a definitive calibration of  the
instrument for actual flue gas is not possible; although calibrated
using methane, the instrument reading is interpreted as a semi-quantitative
measurement of all organics.

     Several combustion modification techniques were identified
which have an appreciable effect on emission factors and, therefore,
can be developed and applied to reduce emissions in consumer use.
The more promising design modifications include:  prevention of
heating the inventory of wood within the stove but not  yet actively
burning, focusing the air supply into the primary burning area with
high turbulence, and increasing the temperatures in the secondary
burning regions of the appliances.

A-16.  Tennessee Valley Authority (Reference No. 16)

     Duncan, et al., 1979

     This agency initiated an experimental evaluation of several
wood stoves proposed for customer use in regions of their utility
district.  The program was initiated with the measurement of efficiency
by the indirect method, and emissions using on-line instrumentation.
The stoves were fired with kiln-dried fir, using the UL batch


                                 31

-------
burning procedure in which a  test consists  of burning  a  fresh
charge of wood to 95 percent  completion on  a weight  basis.   Three
rates of burning were maintained for  each stove  in separate  runs.

     After a destructive fire occurred at the TVA facility in
Chattanooga, Battelle conducted additional  tests for TVA at  Battelle's
Columbus Laboratories.  These continued tests were modified  to
include the burning of air-dried oak  in larger triangular pieces,
simulating typical residential split  cordwood.   A conversation with
Karen Knight of TVA indicates that  test results  are  preliminary and
no published material is yet  available.

A-17.  California Air Resources Board  (Reference No. 17)

     Kosel, 1977

     This agency conducted tests in 1977 on two  free-standing
stoves in both residential and laboratory test installations.
Fuels used were oak, pine, and coal,  and relatively  high burning
rates were maintained with frequent additions of wood.   Particulate
emissions were determined using EPA Method  5.  Bag samples were
used for total hydrocarbon and other  gaseous determinations  at
another location using gas chromotography.

A-18.  New York University of Plattsburgh (Reference No. 18)

     Barnett and Shea, 1981

     This program of stove development has  focused on  overall
efficiency and particulate emissions  as affected by  stove design,
operating procedures, and controls development (thermostatic).  The
emission measurements have been limited to  particulates  as measured
by collection on a cooled but not temperature-controlled filter
from stack gases withdrawn through a  probe.  The velocities  of
specimen withdrawal and stack flow  are measured  by hot wire  anemometers,
with sampling velocities greatly exceeding  stack velocities.
Particulate collections have  been made using 1 minute  sampling
periods at 10 minute intervals throughout run periods  of several
hours.  Stove operation has generally been  at very low burning
rates, i.e., stove exit temperatures  140 to 500°F.

A-19.  Monsanto Research Corporation  (Reference  No.  19)

     Peters, 1981

     This paper presents some of the  results of  a test program
conducted by the EPA, Monsanto Research Corporation, and Auburn
University to characterize emissions  from wood-burning equipment,
specifically, two air-tight stoves and a heat circulating fireplace
while burning four varieties  of wood.  POM's were collected  using a
modified EPA Method 5 train and a SASS train.
                                 32

-------
     Over 75 organic compounds were identified  and  quantified upon
characterization of the organic material present  in the  flue  gas;
22 of these were POM's.  The POM's accounted  for  up to about  35 percent
of the mass of organics identified by GC/MS.  The total  POM emission
factor was found to be an order of magnitude  lower  for the fireplace
than for either wood-burning stove; this is consistent with the
carbon monoxide and nitrogen oxide results which  indicate  more
efficient combustion and/or higher combustion temperature  in  the
fireplace.

A-20.  Pedco Environmental, Inc.

     1977

     Emission tests were conducted from September 21-30,  1977,  on
two fireplaces, a stove, and a restaurant grill exhaust  in Vail,
Colorado.  Tests were conducted under various operating  conditions
to establish the probable range of emission rates.   Measurements
were made of total and condensible particulate, carbon dioxide,
carbon monoxide, and gaseous hydrocarbons as  well as the velocity
and temperature of the flue gas.

     A total of fifteen tests were conducted  on the fireplaces. No
significant differences in emission rates of  any  of the  pollutants
were found between the two fireplaces, between  dry  and green  wood,
or between pine and aspen.  The condensible portion or "back-half"
catch averaged 75 percent of the total particulate  loadings.   No
indication was given as to the sampling techniques  used  to quantify
"hydrocarbons", and the hydrocarbon test results  were highly  erratic.

A-21.  Canadian Combustion Research Laboratory

     Hayden and Braaten, 1982

     Controlled combustion wood stoves have been  shown to  have  a
significant degree of incompleteness of combustion  and corresponding
high emissions.  This paper shows that emission levels of  carbon
monoxide, unburnt hydrocarbons as measured by a flame ionization
detector and polycyclic organic matter (POM's)  are  closely related,
and are very sensitive to firing rate below a "critical  rate",
which is stove dependent.  Above this, the firing rate has much
less effect on emission levels.  Two technical  strategies  to  reduce
emission levels by improving combustion are primarily effective in
shifting the critical burn rate to lower levels,  with little  effect
on emissions at higher burn rates.  This makes  the  determination of
the critical rate one of the more important factors in the evaluation
of wood-fired appliances.  Typical home heat  demands are shown  to
be below the critical burn rate of a typical  controlled-combustion
stove for much of the heating season, resulting in  field emissions
which may be much higher than those indicated by  laboratory tests
above this rate.  One way of reducing emission  levels is to improve
combustion design.   This is also likely to reduce creosote formation,
thus increasing safety; increased efficiency  is another  likely
benefit.

                                33

-------
     The experimental program  described  in  this  paper was  designed
to determine the effect of  firing  rate on emissions,  to  define a
more reliable  technique for measuring unburned hydrocarbons  continuously
and to determine if appliances with  more sophisticated combustion
designs offered performance with reduced emissions,  relative to
conventional wood-fired appliances.

A-22.  Tennessee Valley Authority

     Knight and Graham, 1981

     This paper presents  draft results of TVA's  current  efforts
toward* development of performance  maps for  several units  tested,
i.e., a nonbaffled, airtight wood  appliance very common  to the TVA
region, and a  new box catalytic model that  can potentially offer
major improvements in thermal  efficiency and reductions  in overall
emissions.  The two heating appliances were operated  over  the  full
range of supply air control and wood fuel loading with at  least
twenty tests being completed for each type  of  fuel.   Continuous
sampling of the flue gases  was used  to indirectly determine  the
thermal efficiency while  a  Modified  EPA Method 5 system  was  used
for the recovery of an integrated  flue gas  sample.   Carbon monoxide
(CO) nitrous oxides (NO ),  sulfur  dioxide (SO,,),  and  total hydrocarbons
(THC) emission factors were developed using a  continuous analyzer
system.  The remaining emission factors  for filterable particulates,
condensible organics, volatile hydrocarbons, and polycyclic  organic
materials were developed  using a Modified Method 5 System.

A-23.  Tennessee Valley Authority

     Knight et. al, 1982

     This study involved  the evaluation  of  efficiencies, emissions,
and other environmental effects for  eight airtight,  residential
wood heaters.  These models include  a fireplace  insert,  free standing
radiant models and circulators  (both free and  forced  circulation).
Data was gathered at Battelle  Laboratories  under contract  to TVA
and the results were analyzed  and  models were  developed  by TVA.
Emissions monitoring equipment consisted of a  system of  continuous
analyzers, thermocouples, and  a sampling train using  a Modified EPA
Method 5 system.  Continuous monitors for six  gas species  (C02, CO,
0-, SO-, NO ,  and THC) were obtained and utilized in  arriving  at
thermal efficiencies and  emission  factors for  each  test.   This test
program did not address back half  filter catch with  regard to
particulate emissions.  Fir and oak  fuels were  tested over a burn
rate range of  4 to 31 pounds per hour  (1.8  to  14.1 kilograms per
hour).
                                   34

-------
A-24.  Vermont Agency of Environmental  Conservation

     Poirot and Sanborn, 1981

          This document attempts  to  duplicate  actual  operating
conditions as closely as possible and also  incorporates  a complete
burn cycle for each test.  Burn rates ranged from 2.2 to 4.8 kg/hr
(4.8 to 10.6 Ib/hr).  By incorporating  a complete burn cycle within
each test,the effects of inter-cycle variability  were kept to a
minimum.  Only baseline test results were included in the AP-42
data base, as baseline conditions represent stove configurations as
the manufacturer intended prior to modification of existing secondary
air systems by personnel conducting  the emissions testing.
     The premise of the study is  that the majority of secondary air
systems presently available introduce air at far  too  low a temperature
to promote true secondary combustion.   The  intention  was to develop
new secondary air systems for two existing  wood stove designs which
would deliver the proper amount of secondary air  at the  right
location with adequate turbulence and sufficient  temperature to
promote true secondary combustion.

A-25.  Vermont Agency of Environmental  Conservation

     Sanborn, et. al, 1981

     To address the question of how much particulate  and condensible
organics an average woodburning appliance emits,  testing of a full
range of woodburning appliances took place  between December 1979
and March 1981.  Emission tests were conducted on fourteen units
which included airtight stoves, parlor  stoves, box stoves and wood
furnaces.  Tests were made using either EPA Method 5  or  a Hi-Volume
sampling method.

     It was determined that the average total particulate emission
rate (both front half particle and back half organics) was 19.1 g/kg
with a range of 6.6 g/kg to 42.2 g/kg.  The condensible  organic
portion (back half recovery) averaged 37 percent  of this weight
with a range of 15 to 64 percent.  It was also found  that a wood
furnace has a lower emission rate than  the  wood stoves do.   The
burning rate for the stoves varied from 1.8 to 4.7 kg/hr.  In all
cases, the fuel used was seasoned hardwood.

A-26.  Del Green Associates, Woodburn,  Oregon  (Supplemental Reference)

     Neulicht, 1981

     This company is conducting a program for Region  X,  U.S.  EPA,
concerned with wood stove utilization in their area.   The multi-task
program includes a source sampling task to  (1) determine effects of
wood moisture content on emissions,  (2) develop simplified testing
procedure, and (3) develop reasonable standards for stove emissions
using 6 stoves in their program.  Another task includes  indoor air
                                35

-------
pollution measurements  in a few  residences heated  by  wood  burning
within the living space.

     This document, when finalized, will  be  obtained  and  placed  in
the background file under "New Additional References" to  be  included
in any future revision  effort.
                                  36

-------
                  Appendix B

Test Results Extracted From References and Used
       in Emission Factor Determinations
                        37

-------
                           Co
A774
                                                I  i-0
   x/7
3

-------
 ft
 a
 z
H8
f&
V/8
4J5
 3.£
 2--S
 3-7-
 7.0
 z.
-------
                             REFERENCE NO.  4  (CONT'O)
                   LOW-MOLECUIAR-WEIGHT  HYDROCARBON EMISSIONS'
                                  (g/kg)

Emission species
Methane, CHi*
Ct to Ca hydrocarbons
Ethylene, CjH*
Ethane , CjH«
Cj to Ca hydrocarbons
Propylene, CaH«
Propane, CaHe
Ca to Ci. hydrocarbons
Sutylene, C*Hg
Butane , C*H 1 o
Ca to Cs hydrocarbons
Pentene, CjHio
Fireolace Baffled stove
seasoned oak seasoned pine
0.5
0.2
0.5 0.3
0.1

0.08
0.08
0.5


15 0.5
<0.08
Nonbaffled stove
Green oak Green pine

0.02




2.4

0.04

0.6

Pentane,
Cs to C«  hydrocarbons
Hexene, C«His
Hexane, C«H1tt
>C« hydrocarbons
  Total
                          2.6


                          0 . 5
                         19
0.5

2.3
                                                         0.3
                                                         0.3
                                                                    3.0
Note:   Blanks indicate emissions  not detected.
a
 Determined by GC/FID at test site.

-------
* % C^4rr~&*     f^ &&,        fr^-Atf   2*6'/I «f
ft^ter^
* 3.f
* 3.4
/*a
/o.a
3/./
2o-o
Z/.4
2-7-3
c/
^A
^3
47
to
42.
35-
zs-
27.
22.
                     e
                     S3
     42.             ^                /3.$      /o./
                                        W
                                       0.4


-------
             *
             f.fi
/./sr
7.7,9
AT
                       /o6
                       //£
                                           CD
                       Z13
                       Z1&
                                      &tf
31
                                    Zo
             IS"
             27
             X
             4>

-------
                         o.S
                         22.-Z.
                        2-3
             S38
             /jo
0-iT.~Z.S3
3.o
                         1.1
                         27
                <* S7*&* **J
            /STZ,
            2-7
            Z.f
 7?
5". ^
                                 ^. -#Li  ^^
.004
                                                                     . oz>£
                     SUjOfUcj j \]*Gi&!&. >T^*»TAC

-------
                    (  /faro /* tavr*
             &A      M*      -7#e?
 77         22^        /./
             3«>        A£
             236        /.*
                        /•<
                        * 7
             IS        a./
             3±        *I
             *H        0-1
            6*        2-1
            61          /.&
/»           7°         ^          //?
/f           J5         25          /f
2*           37         /7          ^
^          ^*         ^
37           £3         <3^
            Sf        t>£          £
             £         II           t
            74        ^          f
            ^        ^         /^
            37         df         J4
            3         2.0          /
            ^7        A^         A
            5-f        /^          33

-------
                 /T
&
 4-1-3
                                    7V
zz.8
22>
                                                             f 3
                                               77
                                              xz-3
*/

-------
               .  22.
SB
         /<«_
                                                 I
                                                 2-
                                                /r
                                                X
                                                a
                                                «•
                                                c
                                                7
                                                5
/3
X
27
                                               2f
                                               37
                                               57
                                              ^2.
                                              53
   <22

 /77
 ^
 ^f
 ^
 757
        £B
        4*
        ^
 1
*+
27^
                                                      73
                                                      /»7
                                                      ^
                                                      ^
                                                      77
                                                     /w
      /2T

      ^
     /*«
                14
                1
                                                                /?
                                                               /•z.
                /a
                2»
                <7
                ^7
                                                               Jo
                                                              n
        57
        53
                                                                                        A/2.
                                                                      -M;
                A 38
                A^"
                *2?
                                                                               ^

                                                                               /?
                                                                                       O^SI
                                                                     ^-77
                               /?
               3f
               z£     0.37
               /r      -
                                                                     0*11,

-------
           . 23
/sa
/ar
 4V
 S3.1
77-3
34.0

4;1
          23.o
                      '•7
                      */
                      Z-l
• i)
•af
               5*
               /»
               7
               sy
               •fe
               75-
              /ar
              /^/
              ^
              /'T?
              ^7
             /r?
              275"
                                             77/0

                                             #.*
                                                       3*-°
                                                       214
                                                       ns
                                             ^. 3
                                             ^/3
                                             ^L
                                             27-5-
                                                                  /•$
                                                       z-7
                                                       r-T.
                                                       ^
                                                       /^
                                                       '•1
                                                                  2. -2.
                                                                            •25

-------
      28.2.
      2&.o
      25.?
      /S.I.
25"
                                                 -7-a

-------
                                   TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                            (Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing}
  REPORT NO.
    EPA-450/4-82-003
             3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION>NO.
   FLE AND SUBTITLE
    Emission  Factor Documentation For  AP-42:

         Section  1.10,  Residential Wood  Stoves
             5. REPORT DATE
                , Mav 1983
             6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7 AUTHOR(S)
                                                           8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
    Pacific Environmental Services   Inc
    1905 Chapel Hill  St.
    Durham, NC  27707
             10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
             11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
                                                               68-02-3511
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
   US  Environmental Protection Agency
   Research  Triangle Park,  NC  27711
             13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
             14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
       EPA Project Officer:  William H. Lamason,  II
16. ABSTRACT

        Emissions from wood combustion in residential stoves and  associated effects
   have only recently been the subject of intensive investigation.   A wide range of
   emission rates has been reported, and many  results are not comparable because
   operating conditions  under test are not  equivalent.  The purpose  of this effort
   is to assemble and organize emissions data  from past and continuing research, to
   screen these data for quality and freshness,  and to incorporate  them into the AP-42
   emission factor file.   This report discusses  variables affecting  emissions,
   documents how AP-42 emission factors were recalculated, and rates the quality of
   the factors.  Emission measurement programs reviewed and actual  test data used  in
   the revision are summarized in appendices.
17.
                                KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                  DESCRIPTORS
                                              b.lDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS  C.  COSATI Field/Group
13. DISTRIBUTION STATEMEN1
19. SECURITY CLASS (This Reporl)
                                                                         21. NO. OF PAGES
                                              20. SECURITY CLASS (This page I
                                                                         22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73)

-------